The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCommittee of the Whole Packet for 03/28/2016 Committee of th Whole Attendance Date: 5 �/� �" ! / COUNCIL PRESENT � Randy Corman, President � Armondo Pavone, Pres. Pro-Tem � Ryan Mclrvin � Ruth Perez ❑ Don Persson �s1 Ed Prince � Carol Ann Witschi SAFF PRESENT � Other: I�a�It.- ��v�nvv►oJI.S �, Kelly Beymer, Community Services Administrator ❑ Other: �k��a+� ��O�,n� ❑ Ellen Bradley-Mak, Human Resources& Risk ❑ Other: �(1�`� �.��C1., Management Administrator � ❑ Other: �it�--� S f�+,,��-e,•, � Jay Covington, ChiefAdministrative Officer ❑ Other: ��Inv� C��(vrn� ❑ Zanetta Fontes, Senior Assistant City Attorney ❑ Other: �r�Y�1 i� (/�/�a�1�C`S � Megan Gregor, Deputy City Clerk ❑ Other: � ❑ Jennifer Henning, Planning Director ❑ Other: ❑ Doug Jacobson, Deputy Public Works ❑ Other: Administrator Denis Law, Mayor ❑ Other: - ❑ Other: Cliff Long, Economic Development Director ❑ Other: �L lulia Medzegian, City Council Liaison ❑ Other: � Chief Kevin Milosevich, Police Department ❑ Other: ❑ Shane Moloney, Senior Assistant City Attorney ❑ Other: ❑ Chief Mark Peterson, Fire& Emergency Services Department � Gregg Zimmerman, Public Works Administrator ❑ Jason Seth, City Clerk � Preeti Shridhar, Deputy Public Affairs Administrator � Chip Vincent, Community and Economic Development Administrator '�.' Larry Warren, City Attorney �. Iwen Wang,Administrative Services Administrator AGENDA Committee of the Whole Meeting 5:30 PM - Monday, March 28, 2016 Conferencing Center, 7th Floor, City Hall – 1055 S. Grady Way 1. Regional Issues 2. Downtown Revitalization/General Economic Dev. Update a) Downtown Civic Core Vision Plan RFP b) Request for Interest/Proposals for 200 Mill Ave. 3. Sunset Lane Latecomer Agreement a) PowerPoint Presentation 1 Request for Proposals Downtown Civic Core Vision and Action Plan OVERVIEW The City of Renton is seeking a professional consultant to develop a Vision and Action Plan (“Plan”) for the Downtown Business District “Civic Core” area (see attached map). The City desires to strengthen the area to ensure that it is a safe and inviting place that will catalyze growth and investment throughout the business district. The Plan would include a master plan and implementation strategies that will guide the City as it considers future use and development of existing civic facilities and public improvements in the area. Overall, the Plan should determine how to recreate the area into a dynamic, active place that energizes and transforms the heart of Downtown into a destination for residents, employees, visitors and businesses. BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE In the late 1990s and early 2000s, the City acquired property within the area to revitalize Downtown with higher density mixed-use development supported by public amenities. Several multi-story residential projects with street level retail space were developed around a city-owned block with key civic facilities, including a transit center, municipal parking garage, event center, and central park/public plaza. In the decade since completion of these improvements, the area has struggled with issues such as long-term retail space vacancies, criminal activity, over usage of curb space for idling busses, and underutilization of many of the civic facilities. To address this situation, the City recently initiated several actions. It is currently developing a plan with regional transit systems that would relocate many of the transit center’s operations to a location at the southwest edge of the greater Downtown area, while retaining several bus routes that provide direct access to the business district and Civic Core. The City owns a vacant property to the west of the central park/public plaza that may be considered in the redesign of this amenity to increase programming and functionality. With numerous public parks and trails, natural areas like the Cedar River, and the IKEA Performing Arts Center located in close proximity to the Civic Core, there are opportunities to create connections between these amenities, the Civic Core, and the surrounding area. AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 2 To ensure effective coordination of all of these actions, the City is seeking proposals from consultants with experience and expertise in the successful completion of a Vision and Action Plan that will ensure effective coordination of all of these actions, while also: • Helping the City better understand the role of all of the City’s public assets within the Civic Core; • Engaging the community in determining how the area can be better utilized; and • Providing a vision of how to maximize the area’s true potential, in both serving as a desired community gathering place as well as becoming a highly attractive catalyst for growth and investment. This project brings an opportunity to utilize “placemaking” exercises to reimagine and reinvent the public spaces that make up the Civic Core area, by better understanding the interaction of land uses, public facilities, parks and trails, maintenance, private businesses, streetscapes, programming, and social connections as they merge in the center of Renton. The resulting plan and strategies should ensure opportunities for positive social activity within a well-designed, functional environment—a sustainable environment that will stimulate economic growth of the entire business district. PROJECT SCOPE AND KEY ISSUES The Vision and Action Plan will consist of a visionary master plan for the Civic Core and surrounding area that identifies a highly-functioning layout of land uses, public facilities, and private development, and supplemented by an action plan of implementation strategies to help achieve the vision. The City would like to better understand how the location, use, and in some cases, expansion of the civic facilities, as well as their interaction with adjacent and nearby private improvements and uses, impact the performance of the facilities and the overall Civic Core area. Some of the issues and questions to be considered in development of the Plan include: • Overall Civic Core Area. With the investment made by the City over the past 20 years, why does the area not appear to be working as a whole or having a positive impact on Downtown? o Evaluate current facilities and their interactions with each other and surrounding developments for deficiencies and limitations o Determine how the individual uses can work better as a whole, while becoming a catalyst to the entire business district, City Center community, and the City • Transit Center. If relocated, what is the highest and best use of the current facility? o Determine Downtown transit needs to remain o Repurpose and utilize area for other benefits. • Municipal Parking Garage. How can the structure better serve as a safe, successful parking resource for businesses, employees, residents and developers? o Better utilization of the structure’s parking stalls and ground floor commercial space, and treatment of uninhabited areas facing streets and sidewalks o Evaluate parking demand/needs and role of the garage o Determine opportunities to attract development nearby by utilizing available parking. • Pavilion Event Center. In light of market changes and redesign of the area, what is the role for this building? o Potential repurpose and/or continue as the central meeting place for Downtown AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 3 o Evaluate central meeting space needs for Downtown. o Evaluate the relationship to the existing Piazza and Gateway Parks • Piazza and Gateway Parks. What role(s) do these play and what improvements and/or accommodations are recommended to maximize the public’s use? How can these amenities be utilized to catalyze the Civic Core? How should these open spaces be designed to serve as safe, vibrant, and attractive amenities for Downtown? o Expansion and/or Redesign o Special events and programming o Farmers Market and other events o Public/Private partnerships o Recommendations for best practices in public space development to guide further park/plaza design to enhance and support downtown redevelopment o Connectivity with pedestrian and bike trails and Burnett Linear Park. • Festival Street. How can the concept of a festival street be integrated into the area to support larger events and festivals? o Best location to couple with open spaces for events, mindful of traffic and bus patterns. • Private Investment. How can private investment and development opportunities be utilized to enrich the area’s public amenities? ADDITIONAL PROJECT SCOPE In addition to addressing the key issues listed above, the Plan should consider and evaluate the following related items: o Understanding transportation patterns within and through the study area o Creating a pedestrian-friendly environment throughout the area o Promoting economic development opportunities  Need for private development together with public investment  Need for a regional draw/attraction to increase visitors and pedestrian traffic in Downtown o Integrating streetscape and urban design elements, as well as opportunities for public art o Promoting interactions between public spaces, sidewalks, streets and storefronts o Addressing utility/infrastructure needs for proposed improvements, as well as understanding how Downtown’s larger infrastructure needs impact the area o Identifying solutions for public restroom facilities to support the study area o Developing funding and financing options for Plan recommendations o Engaging Downtown stakeholders and the Renton community in development of the Plan o Understanding the underlying issues that contribute to the underutilization of the area, including zoning, demographics, housing types, and competition from nearby activity centers and new developments that may draw away from the Downtown area. AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 4 PROJECT BOUNDARY The boundary for the Plan is shown on the attached map. Properties adjacent to the study area may also be considered in the plan if deemed essential to developing a successful vision for the area and successfully implementing the plan. COMMUNITY AND STAKEHOLDER PARTICIPATION To create a meaningful vision and action plan, the City expects that the Consultant will include within its project scope a meaningful public participation process that engages specific stakeholder groups and the community at large. A sample of stakeholder groups that should be involved includes, but is not limited to: • Renton Downtown Partnership • Piazza Renton • Renton Chamber of Commerce • Downtown business and property owners (particularly those adjacent to the study area) • Downtown residents (particularly those adjacent to the study area) • City boards and commissions such as the Parks and Municipal Arts Commissions • Nearby neighborhood and downtown-centric associations The successful Consultant will propose a public participation process that includes the full spectrum of participation tools, and includes modern means of gathering input from community segments that do not have the time to participate in traditional meetings or workshops. The Consultant will endeavor to utilize the public participation process to understand the study area’s history and current issues/obstacles, as well as develop a community-based vision and strategy for changes and improvements to the study area. Community and stakeholder involvement would include on-going communication with a project team consisting of City staff from various departments, as well as interaction/meetings with a stakeholder committee and outreach to the larger community. City staff will assist the selected Consultant in designing and delivering the public participation process. PROJECT TIMELINE AND BUDGET The City anticipates a nine (9) month timeline to complete the Plan with presentations to the City Council on the final plan following immediately after this timeframe. DELIVERABLES The Consultant will prepare the Plan for the area shown in the project boundary map as included in this document, as well as immediately adjacent properties that should be reasonably considered as necessary to provide a successful plan for the Civic Core area. It is expected that the deliverables will include multiple working draft versions of the document that will be refined in consultation with City staff and/or project working committee. AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 5 As part of the Plan, a master plan layout of the study area should be included that maps out the area as envisioned within the Plan. Perspective renderings of key components of the Plan are encouraged to illustrate the Plan’s recommendations, along with a functional diagram of the Piazza and Gateway Parks which indicates general components, locations, interrelations, and sizes. The Consultant is expected to prepare information to present via the City’s website or other forms of social media. FORMAT OF DELIVERABLES • ___(_) color hard copies of the Plan. • PDF file of complete plan. • Digital files of plan and all attachments, maps and data within original software format, as well as individual PDF files. All maps and databases shall become property of the City. • All narrative portions shall be prepared and delivered in __________. • All map data and maps shall be prepared and delivered in ESRI GIS geodatabase format and ArcMap version __ or higher or ArcGIS Pro Documents. • All deliverables shall become property of the City. PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS The City invites highly qualified multi-disciplinary consultants to submit proposals to develop the plan. The proposal may include one or more team members, based upon the approach recommended to complete the project. Proposals must demonstrate a clear understanding of the project. Any proposal responding to this Request for Proposals (RFP) should include the following: a. Title page with lead firm and contact information. b. Cover letter. c. Proposal Narrative explaining the team’s familiarity with the City of Renton, its downtown and the plan area, and the needs and challenges for the plan area. The Narrative should also explain the team’s interest in taking on the project. d. A matrix of Project-related Experience and Project Examples highlighting work in other communities. The matrix should include name of community, project/document title, date, brief description of the project, and description of project’s applicability to the Civic Core project. Four examples should be provided. Only electronic copies of example documents should be provide on the flash drive specified in the Submittal Requirements section below. e. A matrix of team members, specifying project role, specialty component, and key staff. Resumes of key staff members shall be included. f. Project Approach and Scope Outline, including but not limited to: 1. Project tasks/scope of work; 2. Description of public participation process; 3. Timeline and key milestones; and AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 6 4. List of deliverables and proposed software to be used in completing documents and maps. g. References from previous projects completed. A total of four references are included, with at least two of them from clients related to the four project examples provided in “d” above. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS One original and eight (8) hard copies (within 3-ring binders tabbed in accordance with the Proposal Requirements above) along with an electronic PDF stored on a flash drive shall be submitted in a sealed envelope or box by 4:00 PST on _______, _______ __, 2016. Please mark “Proposal for the City of Renton Downtown Civic Core Vision and Action Plan” on the front of the envelope or box. SELECTION CRITERIA AND PROCESS All submitted proposals will be reviewed by a selection committee composed of City staff and community representatives. The selection committee will determine a finalist short list (preliminary review; no less than three teams), and each finalist will be offered an opportunity to interview and present its proposal to the selection committee. The committee will select a top candidate to recommend to City Council for entering into a consultant contract. Top candidate selection will be based upon the following criteria: a. Specialized experience of the team and related experience on projects of similar scope in similar type and market communities; b. Proposed project approach, including team organization and structure, and understanding of project objectives; c. Completeness of the response proposal; d. Qualifications, references, and capability of key staff; e. Approach to facilitating meaningful public participation through a variety of means and media; f. Demonstrated ability to engage businesses and residents in development of the plan, as well as propose implementation measures that will sustain engagement into the future; and g. Proposed timeline/schedule for completion of project. TENTATIVE TIMELINE Distribution date of RFP Last day for additional questions about RFP Pre-submittal presentation RFP Deadline to submit proposal Staff review of submittals for short list of finalists Interviews conducted for short list finalists Staff recommendation submitted to Council’s Committee of the Whole AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 7 QUESTIONS Questions about the RFP or the project should be directed to: John W. Collum, AICP, Community and Economic Development Department, via email at jcollum@rentonwa.gov TERMS AND CONDITIONS The City reserves the right…… ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (to be attached) a. Maps i. Vicinity Map identifying the City Center community ii. Downtown Business District Map with Civic Core identified b. City and Downtown Background information and demographics c. List of existing plans and studies that cover the study area d. Compilation of current and future projects in Downtown e. Draft consultant agreement AGENDA ITEM #2. a) RentonHIgh School Renton IKEAPerforming ArtsCenter Transit Center RentonPavilionEvent Center RentonLibrary Fire Station11 RentonHistory Museum US PostOffice M i l l A v e M o r r i s A v e S S m i t h e r s A v e S W i l l i a m s A v e S !((PP Municipal Parking Garage B N I n c ú÷÷515 ú÷÷900 ú÷÷900ú÷÷900ú÷÷900 ú÷÷900 ® ® ® ® ® ® W e l l s A v e S W e l l s A v e S B u r n e t t A v e S S 4th St S 4th StWilliams A v e S W i l l i a m s A v e S L o g a n A v e S C e d a r A v e S W h i t w o r t h A v e S B u r n e t t A v e S S 2nd St B r o n s o n W a y N S 3rd StS 3rd St M a i n A v e S S 2nd St Cedar River Cedar River Pi a z zaPiazzaParkParkGatewayGatewayParkPark Jo n esJonesParkPark Central DT Vision and Action Plan Study Area Public Building !((ÖÖ Post Office Æc Library !((tt Public Parking !((mm Education Facility ² A G E N D A I T E M # 2 . a ) 1 Executive Summary and Outline Request for Interest-Request for Proposals 200 Mill Avenue – Former Renton City Hall I. Development Opportunity The City of Renton is offering a prime opportunity site for redevelopment: The 200 Mill Building (Former Renton City Hall) and related site area. The City owns the property and is interested in seeking expressions of interest from capable developers to partner in the repositioning and/or redevelopment of the building and site in a manner consistent with the planning goals of the City Center Community Plan, applicable development standards and the Center Downtown zoning designation, which permits a broad array of uses including office, retail/commercial, and multifamily residential uses with an emphasis on increased density and more intensive site utilization. From the Request for Interest (RFI) responses, the City intends to invite formal development proposals through a subsequent Request for Proposals (RFP) process. It is the City’s intent/desire to identify a single development team through this RFI / RFP process to enter into an Exclusive Negotiating Agreement (ENA) for disposition and development of the property in a manner that balances the City’s goals and objectives with the market and economic realities of this growing urban center area. AGENDA ITEM #2. b) 2 II. City Goals & Objectives A. Development Goals Proposals should be consistent with the goals of the City Center Community Plan, as it relates to the subject site, which is located in an area identified as the “Civic Node,” so named for its abundant civic, recreational and cultural amenities. Among the Community Plan goals relevant to development within the Civic Node are: Goal 1: Improve the visibility of the City Center and Downtown, improve the perception of the City Center and create a distinct identity. Goal 2: Continue to support Renton’s diverse economic sectors. Goal 3: Improve access and visibility…to create a dynamic civic node in Downtown. Goal 8: Protect and enhance the natural features and open space in the City Center and improve public access to … the Cedar River and the variety of parks and open spaces throughout the City Center. Consistent with these goals, the City is interested in exploring developer interest for a variety of possible options, including: 1) Repositioning and continued use of the existing office building along with more intensive development of the site remainder, to 2) Full redevelopment of the site in a manner consistent with the Center Downtown zoning and shoreline regulations.1 With redevelopment, a variety of options have been envisioned, from build-to-suit office/commercial space, hotel development, multifamily residential or some combination thereof. The City has not identified a strong preference for one alternative over another, but is interested in entertaining proposals along these or similar lines that achieve the more intensive use potential of the site. B. City Objectives The City intends that proposed development of the 200 Mill site will achieve the following objectives: 1. Return an under-utilized City-owned site to private use in a manner that complements and further fosters the image and function of the Civic Node and City Center; 2. Provide enhanced access and visibility of this area and better connections to surrounding civic and cultural amenities; 3. Maximize the appeal of this area with development that brings more intensive use, round-the- clock activity and energy to the area; 4. Retain parking for the public library in accordance with lease commitment in any redevelopment scenario; and 5. Incorporation of a minimum level of public benefits/amenities as part of the development (list of potential benefits to be determined). 1 The site’s adjacency to the Cedar River results in a 100’ shoreline setback area of approximately 60,000 square feet, where new development would be prohibited or substantially limited. AGENDA ITEM #2. b) 3 III. Process Steps / Timeline: This RFI is the initial step in the City’s process. It is the intent of the City to solicit potential development interest in order to better understand and refine potential development goals and to be incorporated into a subsequent RFP process for disposition and redevelopment of the site. The anticipated RFI/RFP process timeline is expected to run through December 2016 with key milestones outlined below. A. Timeline for RFI Process RFI Solicitation Week of April __ Site & Building Tours Week of April __ Cut off for questions April __ RFI Responses Due _______ City will generate a list of qualified developers from RFI process and solicit those teams to respond in the formal RFP process. B. Timeline for RFP Process (final dates dependent upon RFI Response due date) RFP solicitation End of May Developer tours / informational meeting for development teams Early June Developer Proposals Due End of June Developer Presentation Forum July Developer Team Interviews July City Staff briefs Council w/Committee Recommendation July-August Council Approves Developer Selection August City drafts ENA Agreement Terms End of August ENA Agreement Approved by Council / Developer Late September ENA Signed Early October IV. Detailed Property Description: A. Site Breakdown and Surrounding Area B. Building Tenant and Leasing Info C. Building Condition & Recent Upgrades D. Existing Infrastructure and Utility Services E. Current & Planned ROW Improvements AGENDA ITEM #2. b) 4 V. Applicable Development Guidelines Fig. 3 – shoreline setback VI. Submittal Requirements A. RFI Submittal Format / Contents 1. Development Team – Describe team members, organizational chart, history working together 2. Development Concepts that this team is interested in pursuing a. Proposal for existing building – including any phased plan for operation / redevelopment b. Site development plan – including mix of uses, approximate density, amenities c. Development parameters (any particular issues or constraints to participation that may require city consideration or response) 3. Experience / track record of development team with this type of project and its proposed uses 4. Statement of availability to engage in subsequent RFP process on City timeline (any considerations therein) No design plans or detailed development drawings are expected as part of the RFI submittal. Visual examples of past projects the Developer Team has completed are preferred in lieu of site schematics or renderings. VII. RFI Selection Criteria The City seeks to identify 5-6 development teams capable of responding to the City’s RFP with demonstrated capacity to carry out proposed development concepts in a timely, financially responsible manner. Concepts will be evaluated based on the following criteria: A. Soundness of development concept B. Compatibility with stated City Vision, Goals and Objectives for its Central Core area C. Acceptance of / consistency with City’s financial objectives D. Public Benefit E. Demonstrated Track Record of successful similar development Approx. Shoreline 100’ setback line AGENDA ITEM #2. b) 5 VIII. Contact Information Questions may be submitted to the contact below: John Collum, Community Development Project Manager City of Renton Renton City Hall – 6th Floor 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98057-3232 Phone: 425.430.6589 | Fax: 425.430.7300 Email: jcollum@rentonwa.gov AGENDA ITEM #2. b) Su n s e t L a n e N E U t i l i t y a n d Tr a n s p o r t a t i o n L a t e c o m e r B r i e f i n g Da t e Na m e s / T i t l e s La r r y W a r r e n , C i t y A t t o r n e y Ro c a l e T i m m o n s , S e n i o r P l a n n e r Ma r c h 2 8 , 2 0 1 6 Co m m i t t e e o f t h e W h o l e 1AGENDA ITEM #3. a) CO W P r e s e n t a t i o n O u t l i n e • Au t h o r i t y a n d P r o c e s s i n C r e a t i n g L a t e c o m e r • Su n s e t L a n e N E L a t e c o m e r – Pu r p o s e – Pr o j e c t S c o p e – As s e s s m e n t B o u n d a r y / P r e l i m i n a r y A s s e s s m e n t s – As s e s s m e n t M e t h o d • Ne x t S t e p s – Pr e l i m i n a r y N o t i c e – Re q u e s t F o r B i d – Co n s t r u c t i o n – Fi n a l A s s e s s m e n t / O r d i n a n c e 2 AGENDA ITEM #3. a) Ab o u t L a t e c o m e r s  St r e e t l a t e c o m e r s a s s e s s m e n t s a n d a r e a s a r e a u t h o r i z e d b y Ch a p t e r 3 5 . 7 2 R C W . S t r e e t p r o j e c t s s u b j e c t t o r e i m b u r s e m e n t m a y in c l u d e d e s i g n , g r a d i n g , p a v i n g , i n s t a l l a t i o n o f c u r b s , g u t t e r s , s t o r m dr a i n a g e , s i d e w a l k s , s t r e e t l i g h t i n g , t r a f f i c c o n t r o l s a n d o t h e r si m i l a r i m p r o v e m e n t s . RC W 3 5 . 7 2 . 0 2 0 ( 1 ) ( d )  Ut i l i t y P r o j e c t s i n c l u d e w a t e r o r s e w e r f a c i l i t i e s . RC W 35 . 9 1 . 0 2 0 ( 1 ) ( a ) . Wa t e r a n d s e w e r f a c i l i t i e s i n c l u d e s t o r m , s a n i t a r y or c o m b i n a t i o n s e w e r s , p u m p i n g s t a t i o n s a n d d i s p o s a l p l a n t s , wa t e r m a i n s , h y d r a n t s , r e s e r v o i r s a n d a p p u r t e n a n c e s . RC W 35 . 9 1 . 0 1 5 ( 3 )  Th e C i t y m a y b e t h e i n i t i a t o r a n d s o l e b e n e f i c i a r y o f re i m b u r s e m e n t s . RC W 3 5 . 7 2 . 0 5 0 ( 1 ) , R C W 3 5 . 9 1 . 0 6 0 AGENDA ITEM #3. a) St e p s t o C r e a t e a L a t e c o m e r s Ar e a a n d A s s e s s m e n t s  An o r d i n a n c e m u s t b e a d o p t e d t h a t r e q u i r e s t h e p r o j e c t a s a p r e r e q u i s i t e to f u r t h e r p r o p e r t y d e v e l o p m e n t . O r d i n a n c e N o . 5 7 8 3 w a s a d o p t e d o n Fe b r u a r y 1 , 2 0 1 6 . RC W 3 5 . 7 2 . 0 1 0 , R C W 3 5 . 9 1 . 0 6 0 ( 1 ) ( a )  Th e a d m i n i s t r a t i o n s h a l l p r e p a r e a p r e l i m i n a r y d e t e r m i n a t i o n o f t h e la t e c o m e r s b o u n d a r i e s a n d a s s e s s m e n t s .  A n o t i c e o f t h e p r e l i m i n a r y d e t e r m i n a t i o n o f t h e b o u n d a r i e s a n d as s e s s m e n t s m u s t b e s e n t b y c e r t i f i e d m a i l t o e a c h o w n e r o f r e c o r d w i t h th e p r o p o s e d b o u n d a r i e s .  Wi t h i n 2 0 d a y s o f m a i l i n g , a h e a r i n g m a y b e r e q u e s t e d b e f o r e t h e C i t y Co u n c i l w i t h n o t i c e g i v e n t o a l l a f f e c t e d p r o p e r t y o w n e r s . RC W 35 . 7 2 . 0 4 0 ( 2 ) , R C W 3 5 . 9 1 . 0 6 0 ( 1 ) ( c ) AGENDA ITEM #3. a) St e p s T o C r e a t e a L a t e c o m e r s A r e a a n d A s s e s s m e n t s ( c o n t i n u e d ) :  Th e d e t e r m i n a t i o n o f t h e C o u n c i l i s f i n a l RC W 3 5 . 7 2 . 0 4 0 ( 2 ) subject to ju d i c i a l r e v i e w RC W 3 5 . 9 1 . 0 6 0 ( 1 ) ( c ) .  A r e s o l u t i o n m u s t a d o p t t h e l a t e c o m e r s b o u n d a r i e s a n d a s s e s s m e n t s .  Th e c o n s t r u c t i o n i s t h e n c o m p l e t e d .  A f i n a l h e a r i n g i s h e l d , e s t a b l i s h i n g t h e f i n a l a s s e s s m e n t r a t e .  An o r d i n a n c e i s t h e n a d o p t e d s e t t i n g t h e f i n a l a s s e s s m e n t r a t e .  A c e r t i f i e d c o p y o f t h e o r d i n a n c e i s t h e n r e c o r d e d w i t h t h e K i n g Co u n t y R e c o r d e r ’ s O f f i c e . AGENDA ITEM #3. a) No t i c e R e q u i r e m e n t s • A n o t i c e o f t h e p r e l i m i n a r y d e t e r m i n a t i o n o f t h e la t e c o m e r s b o u n d a r i e s a n d a s s e s s m e n t s a l o n g w i t h a de s c r i p t i o n o f t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r s r i g h t s a n d o p t i o n s mu s t b e s e n t b y c e r t i f i e d m a i l t o e a c h o w n e r o f r e c o r d o f re a l p r o p e r t y w i t h i n t h e p r o p o s e d l a t e c o m e r s a r e a . RCW 35 . 7 2 . 0 4 0 ( 2 ) , R C W 3 5 . 9 1 . 0 6 0 ( 1 ) ( c ) , R M C 9 - 5 - 5 • Pr e l i m i n a r y n o t i c e m u s t b e r e c o r d e d w i t h t h e K i n g Co u n t y R e c o r d e r . RC W 3 5 . 7 2 . 0 4 0 ( 3 ) , R C W 3 5 . 9 1 . 0 6 0 ( 2 ) ( d ) AGENDA ITEM #3. a) La t e c o m e r s T i m e L i m i t s Ut i l i t y l a t e c o m e r s h a v e a 2 0 y e a r l i f e . RC W 35 . 9 1 . 0 2 0 ( 2 ) , R M C 9 - 5 - 1 3 . A St r e e t l a t e c o m e r s h a v e a 1 5 y e a r l i f e . RC W 35 . 7 2 . 0 2 0 ( 1 ) , R M C 9 - 5 - 1 3 . B AGENDA ITEM #3. a) Pu r p o s e • Su n s e t T e r r a c e S u b a r e a Re d e v e l o p m e n t – 14 a c r e s – 15 , 0 0 0 S F L i b r a r y – 72 2 m u l t i - f a m i l y u n i t s – Ap p r o x . 1 0 , 0 0 0 S F o f R e t a i l – 3. 2 a c r e p a r k – Ge n e r a l l y b o u n d e d b y Su n s e t L a n e N E 8 AGENDA ITEM #3. a) Pu r p o s e • Su n s e t L a n e N E a n d t h e e x t e n s i o n o f N E 1 0 t h wo u l d c o n s i s t o f a l o c a l a c c e s s l o o p r o a d , a n d ha v e a w i d t h o f 4 9 f e e t 9 AGENDA ITEM #3. a) Pu r p o s e 10 • Be n e f i t s t o C o n s t r u c t i n g S u n s e t L a n e N E a t On e T i m e – Co o r d i n a t e I n f r a s t r u c t u r e I m p r o v e m e n t s – Ec o n o m i e s o f S c a l e – Pr o v i d e P a r k B o u n d a r y – En c o u r a g e R e d e v e l o p m e n t – Le s s D i s r u p t i v e AGENDA ITEM #3. a) Pu r p o s e • Th e C i t y c a n c o m p l e t e l y c o n s t r u c t t h e r e q u i r e d Su n s e t L a n e N E I m p r o v e m e n t s a n d r e c o v e r t h e co s t s f r o m a l l t h o s e w h o b e n e f i t f r o m i t s co n s t r u c t i o n . – Pe r S t a t e L a w ( R C W 3 5 . 7 2 . 0 5 0 a n d 3 5 . 9 1 . 0 6 0 ) – Pe r R e n t o n M u n i c i p a l C o d e ( R M C ) 9 - 5 a n d 9 - 1 6 11 AGENDA ITEM #3. a) Pr o j e c t S c o p e Wa t e r : • In s t a l l a t i o n o f a p p r o x i m a t e l y 2 , 2 8 0 f e e t o f 1 2 ” wa t e r m a i n , 5 1 0 f e e t o f 8 ” w a t e r m a i n , f i r e hy d r a n t s , e t c . , i n S u n s e t L a n e N E , H a r r i n g t o n Av e N E , G l e n n w o o d A v e N E a n d N E 1 0 th St Se w e r : • In s t a l l a t i o n o f a p p r o x i m a t e l y 1 , 3 4 8 f e e t o f 1 2 - in c h s e w e r m a i n , i n S u n s e t L a n e N E , H a r r i n g t o n Av e N E a n d N E 1 0 th St Tr a n s p o r t a t i o n : • In s t a l l a t i o n o f a p p r o x i m a t e l y 2 , 0 0 0 l i n e a r f e e t o f tw o - l a n e r o a d w a y , 2 , 2 0 0 l i n e a r f e e t o f s i d e w a l k , an d 3 , 4 0 0 l i n e a r f e e t o f c u r b / g u t t e r i n S u n s e t La n e N E , H a r r i n g t o n A v e N E , a n d N E 1 0 th St . – Dr a i n a g e i m p r o v e m e n t s , s t r e e t l i g h t i n g , a n d t h e re l o c a t i o n / u n d e r g r o u n d i n g o f a l l p o w e r , n a t u r a l ga s , c a b l e T V , a n d t e l e p h o n e s e r v i c e s a r e a l s o in c l u d e d . 12 AGENDA ITEM #3. a) Pr e l i m i n a r y A s s e s s m e n t • Wa t e r : – $3 0 9 . 0 4 p e r f r o n t - f o o t fo r a l l p r o p e r t i e s w i t h i n t h e a s s e s s m e n t a r e a an d b o u n d a r y . T h e e s t i m a t e d t o t a l a s s e s s m e n t c o s t i s $ 1 , 0 9 0 , 0 0 0 a n d th e t o t a l a s s e s s a b l e f r o n t - f o o t a g e i s 3 , 5 2 7 f e e t . • Se w e r : – $2 5 7 . 7 5 p e r f r o n t - f o o t fo r p r o p e r t i e s w i t h i n t h e a s s e s s m e n t a r e a a n d bo u n d a r y . T h e e s t i m a t e d t o t a l a s s e s s m e n t c o s t i s $ 3 1 1 , 8 7 8 a n d t h e to t a l a s s e s s a b l e f r o n t - f o o t a g e i s 1 , 2 1 0 f e e t . • Tr a n s p o r t a t i o n : – $1 , 8 2 0 . 4 5 p e r f r o n t - f o o t fo r p a r c e l s 2 t h r o u g h 6 a n d p a r c e l 9 , a n d 28 . 6 % o f t h e e s t i m a t e d s t r e e t i m p r o v e m e n t c o s t f o r p a r c e l 1 . T h e es t i m a t e d t o t a l a s s e s s m e n t c o s t i s $ 4 , 3 6 7 , 5 0 0 a n d t h e f r o n t - f o o t a g e i s 3, 1 2 9 f e e t , c o n s i s t o f 1 , 4 1 5 f e e t f o r p a r c e l 1 a n d 1 , 7 1 4 f o r pa r c e l s 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , a n d 9 . 13 AGENDA ITEM #3. a) Tr i g g e r s • Wa t e r : – De v e l o p m e n t a n d / o r r e d e v e l o p m e n t o f t h e p r o p e r t y re q u i r e s f i r e f l o w d e m a n d w h i c h e x c e e d s 1 , 5 0 0 g a l l o n s pe r m i n u t e . • Se w e r : – A p r o p e r t y t h a t i s n o t c o n n e c t e d t o a C i t y s e w e r f a c i l i t y an d t h a t c o n n e c t s t o t h e n e w s e w e r s y s t e m o r de v e l o p m e n t / r e d e v e l o p m e n t w h i c h r e q u i r e s t h e in s t a l l a t i o n o f s e w e r f a c i l i t i e s a c r o s s i t s f r o n t a g e a s re q u i r e d b y R e n t o n M u n i c i p a l C o d e . • Tr a n s p o r t a t i o n : – A p r o p e r t y w h i c h i s d e v e l o p e d a n d / o r r e d e v e l o p e d , s u c h th a t t h e d e v e l o p m e n t a n d / o r r e d e v e l o p m e n t o f t h e pr o p e r t y g e n e r a t e s n e w w e e k d a y t r i p s . 14 AGENDA ITEM #3. a) Ne x t S t e p s • E x p e c t e d t o s e n d n o t i c e t o a l l p a r c e l s t h a t m a y b e n e f i t f r o m t h e im p r o v e m e n t s o n M a r c h 2 9 , 2 0 1 6 • A f f e c t e d p a r t i e s m a y r e q u e s t a p u b l i c h e a r i n g i n w r i t i n g w / i n 2 0 d a y s • C o u n c i l t o a d o p t r e s o l u t i o n & s e t pr e l i m i n a r y b o u n d a r y a n d a s s e s s m e n t ro l l • P r e l i m i n a r y a s s e s s m e n t a n d b o u n d a r y r e c o r d e d w i t h K i n g C o u n t y Pr e l i m i n a r y No t i c e • E s t i m a t e d R e q u e s t F o r B i d i s s u a n c e : A p r i l 2 0 1 6 Re q u e s t F o r B i d • E s t i m a t e d c o n s t r u c t i o n s t a r t d a t e : M a y 2 0 1 6 • E s t i m a t e d c o n s t r u c t i o n c o m p l e t i o n d a t e : F e b r u a r y 2 0 1 7 Co n s t r u c t i o n • F o l l o w i n g c o n s t r u c t i o n t h e C i t y r e c e i v e s t h e a c t u a l ( f i n a l ) c o s t s • F i n a l a s s e s s m e n t d o l l a r a m o u n t s pr o v i d e d i n s e c o n d p u b l i c n o t i c e Fi n a l A s s e s s m e n t • A s s e s s m e n t s f i n a l i z e d b y C i t y O r d i n a n c e • U t i l i t y a s s e s s m e n t s w i l l b e v a l i d f o r a p e r i o d o f 2 0 u n l e s s e x t e n d e d • S t r e e t a s s e s s m e n t s w i l l b e v a l i d f o r a p e r i o d o f 1 5 y e a r s u n l e s s ex t e n d e d Or d i n a n c e 15 AGENDA ITEM #3. a) Qu e s t i o n s AGENDA ITEM #3. a) 17 Pr e l i m i n a r y A s s e s s m e n t B o u n d a r y AGENDA ITEM #3. a) Co l p i t t s R e d e v e l o p m e n t AGENDA ITEM #3. a) Library AGENDA ITEM #3. a) Su n s e t P a r k AGENDA ITEM #3. a)