The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA-04-009o C=> o 'D ~ --. :::-. -... y If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project, compleOEVElOPMENT PLANN this form and retum to: City of Renton, Development Planning, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. ~'ry OF REm-ON ING File No./Name: LUA-04-009, ECF, R (Prezone) FEB 2 5 200~ Carlo Annexation Prezone NAME: Lo L It II R. c HER ,. .. . .. . "~EC~'VED ADDRESS: l'toot! SE. 133 ST i !<.eA)L01),CoA-cr?Ob, TELEPHONE NO.: 1.:<6'--:A:L t:g'-It.;Cflj . ,;,:~ Notice of Application.doc CITY OF RENTON PLANNING / BUILDING / PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM Date: January 25, 2005 To: City Clerk's Office From: Holly Graber . Subject: Land Use File Closeout Please complete the following information to facilitate project closeout and indexing by the City Clerk's Office Project Name: Carlo Annexation Prezone LUA (file) Number: LUA04-009, ECF, R Cross-References: Carlo Annexation -R8 Prezone AKA's: Project Manager: Don Erickson Acceptance Date: February 17, 2004 Applicant: City of Renton -EDNSP Owner: Joseph N. Carlo Contact: Don Erickson PID Number: 152305-9005, 9015-9018, 9024, 9030, 9039, 9046, 9079, 9095, 9103, 9104, 9115, 9194, 9211-9215 ERC Date: March 23, 2004 ERC Appeal Date: Administrative Approval: Appeal Period Ends: Public Hearing Date: Date Appealed to HEX: By Whom: . HEX Decision: Date: Date Appealed to Council: By Whom: Council Decision: May 10, 2004 Date: Mylar Recording Number: Project Description: PREZONE FROM KING COUNTY ZONE R-4 TO RENTON R-8 FOR CARLO ANNEXATION OF 37 ACRES. Location: NE 3rd ST between 136th & 140th Ave SE I To: Gregg Zimmerman, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator Dennis Culp, Community Services Administrator Lee Wheeler, Fire Chief From: Jennifer Henning, Development Planning 'M:~e~in'g:Q~j~:,',:rV1grch2~,:;2004' :orim,~: ":,:;:'; """9':oO::~;M Agenda listed below. IDC Medical Office Building (Fiala) LUA-04-021, ECF, SA-A The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review, Administrative Site Plan approval and a Shoreline Substantial Development permit for the construction of a three-story, 60,420 sq. ft. medical office building. The three-parcel, 9.6 acre site is zoned Commercial Arterial (CA) and is vacant. Primary access would be provided from SW 43rd St. Approximately 296 surface parking stalls would be provided. Springbrook Creek is to the north and within 200 feet of the development. Due to the site's soil type and seismic zone, the building is proposed to be supported on a pile foundation system. The project also includes the installation of landscaping, pedestrian walkways and necessary utility and street improvements. The applicant is requesting modifications to the parking and driveway regulations. Boeing Parking Lots 15, 16, and 17 (Catlin) LUA-04-011, ECF, SME The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review for the construction of 3 new parking lots and the reconfiguration of one existing parking lot within the Boeing manufacturing plant. The proposed parking lot development will include 2,677 spaces. The development will include minor site grading, new asphalt pavement, sidewalks, covered walkway structure installation, landscaping, and light pole installation. A portion of the proposed development will be within 200 feet of the Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM) of the Cedar River and, therefore, a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit is also required. Carlo Annexation -R-8 Rezone (Erickson) LUA-04-009, R, ECF The applicant, Steve Johns, has requested Environmental Review for the proposed rezoning of this 34.83 acre annexation site (excluding streets) from King County's R-4 Zone to Renton's R-8 Zone. Because Annexations are SEPA exempt (RCW 43.21C.222) this environmental review is only for the rezone. Under Renton's R-8 zoning the 37-acre site (including street right-of-way) could theoretically accommodate % 222 dwelling units, assuming 8 du/net acre. The proposed rezone is consistent with Renton's Residential Single Family land use designation, as shown on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. The applicant has submitted a pre-application for review that indicates a total of 170 units. They are not part of this application and cannot be until the site is officially brought into the City. A separate environmental review will be conducted at the project level once this site is brought into the, city. cc: K. Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor J. Covington, Chief Administrative Officer A. Pietsch, EDNSP Administrator ® B. Wolters, EDNSP Director ® J. Gray, Fire Prevention N. Watts, P/B/PW Development Services Director ® F. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner L. Rude, Fire Prevention ® J. Medzegian, Council S. Meyer, P/B/PW Transportation Systems Director R. Lind, Economic Development L. Warren, City Attorney ® STAFF REPORT City of Renton Department of Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE A. BACKGROUND ERC MEETING DATE Project Name Applicant File Number Project Manager Project Description Project Location Exist. Bldg. Area gsf Site Area SITE MAP See below. Project Location Map March 23, 2004 Carlo Annexation -R-8 Rezone Steve Johns LUA-04-009, R, ECF Don Erickson The applicant, Steve Johns, has requested Environmental Review for the proposed rezoning of this 34.83 acre annexation site (excluding streets) from King County's R-4 Zone to Renton's R-8 Zone. Because annexations are SEPA exempt (RCW 43.21C.222) this environmental review is only for the rezone. Under Renton's R-8 zoning the 37 acre site (including street right-of-way) could theoretically accommodate:t 222 dwelling units, assuming 8 du/net acre. The proposed rezone is consistent with Renton's Residential Single Family land use designation, as shown on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. The applicant has submitted a pre-application for review that indicates a total of 170 units. They are not part of this application and cannot be until the site is officially brought into the City. A separate environmental review will be conducted at the project level once this site is brought into the City. The 37-acre site is located between 136th Avenue SE on the west, 140th Avenue SE on the east, NE 3rd Street, if extended on the north, and SE 135th Street, if extended, on the south. N/A Proposed New Bldg. Area gsf N/A 37.0 acres Total Building Area gsf N/A ere report.doe City of Renton EDNSP Department CARLO ANNEXA TION & R8 REZONE REPORT AND DECISION OF MARCH 23, 2004 Figure 3: Existing Structures Map ere report. doe EI nmental Review Committee Staff Report LUA-04-009, R, ECF Page20f3 f! °1 g l [J Q Ii I 0 C::l il--1l __ L. -- I, -, -_.-':t..-::r---.,...",."..--t 1 QI <)0° I ~iE ~J'_nd I S'~' -L 1 o 400 800 FC:;C:C::C::Qto;;;;.;J:c~ c::,;~:~e~~'=:::::' Q Existing Structure ---Renton City Limits I.",;) Proposed Annexation Area 1 : 4800 City of Renton EDNSP Department CARLO ANNEXATION & R8 REZONE REPORT AND DECISION OF MARCH 23. 2004 B. RECOMMENDATION E. nmental Review Committee Staff Report LUA-04-009, R, ECF Page30f3 Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: x DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS with 15 day Comment Period with Concurrent 14 day Appeal Period. C. MITIGATION MEASURES None required for this non-project action. D. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGA TED. Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period with Concurrent 14 da A eal Period. Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period followed by a 14 day Appeal Period. In compliance with RCW 43.21 C. 240, the following non-project environmental review addresses only those impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. 1. Transportation Impacts: None identified for this non-project legislative action. At build-out 222 potential dwellings could potentially create 2,220 vehicle trip ends per average week day. This is equal to 1,110 round trips. Spread out over a number of hours throughout the day this potential number of trips is not anticipated to have a significant adverse impact on surrounding streets. At the project action level at traffic analysis will likely be required. Mitigation Measures: Impacts, if any, are better assessed at the project level. Nexus: Not applicable. 2. Surface Water Impacts: Staff note that increased density that might be allowed under Renton's R-8 zone could potentially increase volumn and peak runoff from future development and potentially degrade water quality. Future development should comply with te 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual standards with Level 2 Flow controls or stricter standards if adopted by the City prior to a development permit application. Mitigation Measures: Impacts, if any, are better assessed at the project level. Nexus: Not applicable. E. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS The proposal has been circulated to City Departmental/Divisional Reviewers for their review. Where applicable, these comments have been incorporated into the text of this report as Mitigation Measures and/or Notes to Applicant . ....K....-Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. ere report. doc City of Renton EDNSP Department CARLO ANNEXATION & R8 REZONE REPORT AND DECISION OF MARCH 23, 2004 E. nmental Review Committee Staff Report LUA-04-009, R, ECF Page4of3 Environmental Determination Appeal Process Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM, April 12th, 2004. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. ere report.doe STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING} AFFIDA VIT OF PUBLICATION PUBLIC NOTICE Lily Nguyen, being first duly sworn on oath that she is a Legal Advertising Representative of the King County Journal a daily newspaper, which newspaper is a legal newspaper of general circulation and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continuously as a daily newspaper in King County, Washington. The King County Journal has been approved as a Legal Newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. The notice in the exact form annexed was published in regular issues of the King County Journal (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a Notice of Environmental Determination was published on Monday, 3/29/04 The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $118.38 at the rate 0~50 per inch for the first publication and N/ A per inch fOI:-e.1ch subs. Lily Nguyen Legal Advertising Representative, King County Journal Subscribed and sworn to me this 29th day of March, 2004. ~Yt~ .\\\\\\1111111/11 \\\\. III I-NOTICE-OF'ENvIR-ONMENTAL , DETERMINATION I ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ! COMMITIEE I RENTON, WASHINGTON : I , The . Envii:onmental ReVieW)' Committee' has 'issued a Determination of Non:Significance I f or the following, project under the: authority of the Renton Municipal Code.'·· . I I CARLO ANNEXATION -R~S I REZONE LUA-04-009, R, ECF Tluiapplicant;. Conner HQmes, has requested Environmental Revie':l' for the proposed rezoning of this 34.S3 acre annexation . site (excluding, streets) from King County's R-4 Zone to, Renton's R-S Zone. Because Annexations are SEPA exempt (ReW 43.2IC.222) this environmental reyiew is only for the rezone. Under Renton's R-S zoning the . 37-acre site (including street right-of-way) could theoretically accommodate ± 222 dwelling units, assuming S' dulnet acre. The'proposed rezone is consistent with Renton's Residential Single Family land . use designation, as:shown. on the I City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use < Map. The appli,cant. has LS.ubmitted_~_.pre-al!1~lication for I "" W\f..AGf-/ 1// Tom A. Meagher ,.;:; 1">.. .......... f:L'. ~~ ~ '"' {'.' E." '7 '/. Notary Public for the Slale of Washington. Residing in Redi110n.d·:,;#l.:r.~nfn>gitxl ~ _ ....... ......::..": 0 .. $" ....... ~ -. ~ AclNumber:84102.") P.O. Numher: ::::;"':£2 ,,"(r-f\Y .. ~ -0 \,) \ t'\ .-Cost of pLlbl ishing this notice includes an affidavit surchiitge. f () ~ 0"'-: Zo == ....... :::,"' ~ ----" : 2 _. Q\ '\ • I--_ -;:.: ... PUv" '\,: C!J ~ ..-;,. <.P " oC::>., ~ .:::-~ .>-•••• MA.Y '2., 'l; •••. ~ ~ 'l "1/, ........... S~· ~ ~//II f: 0 F 'i'l f>' ,'~' II \\\' 111//11111\\\\\ review ffiaCifidic.,ates a totalof~l 170 uriits. They are not part of this . application and cannot be until the site is officially brought I . into the City. A separate environmental review will be conducted at the project level once this site is brought into the city. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed' in writing on or before .5:00 PM Aprill 12, 2004 .. Appeals must be filed inl . 'writing together with the requiredl ., $75,00 application fee with: Hearin~ Examiner, City of Renton, 10551 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Exa~iner. fare I governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-S-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained froml the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)(' 430-6510. . Published in the King County J:o.umal.Mar.ch 29,.20.o'k#S41025---.J ~ ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NUMBER: LOCATION: DESCRIPTION: Carlo Annexation -R-8 Rozone LUA'()~09, R, ECF The proposed 37 acre "L" shaped Carlo Annexation site that Is the subject of this proposed R-8 prezonlng I. located between 13&'" Avenue SE on the w •• t,140CII Avenue SE on the east" NE 3"' Street" If extended on the north, and, SE 135lh Street on the south. It I. Immediately east of the proposed Tydlco Sit. Annexation and assumes that Tydlco will ba brought Into the City In the near future. The applicant. Conner Homes, has requested Environmental Review for the proposed rezoning of this 34.83 acre annexation site (excluding streets) from King County's R-4 Zone to Renton's R-8 Zone. Because Ann.exations are SEPA exempt (ReW 43.21C.222) this environmental review Is only for the rezone. Under Renton's R~8 zoning the 37~acre site (including street right-of·way) could theoretically accommodate ± 222 dwelling units, assuming 8 dufnet acre. The proposed rezone is consistent with Renton's Residential Single Family land use designation, as shown 0 n t he City's Comprehensive P Ian Land Use Map. The applicant has submitted a pre~appllcalion for review that Indicates a total of 170 units. They are not part of this application and cannot be until the site is officially brought into the City. A separate environmental review will be conducted at the project level once this site is broughl into the city. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITIEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM April 12, 2004. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are govemed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.8. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-651 O. I ~mrt-F~ ~r'=";Ji!!,'i!i~===1 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT (425) 430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please Include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file Identification. CERTIFICATION I, 42crn ert~ , hereby certify th...-..-=2"'~_ above document were posted by me in ~ the described property on -...L..F--n+'#-''I'-'----::..-=--T-'~~-=I---~~--7tH'_;___>,; '--~~/1 /l j",,j Signed: ----.:~-:7"'--'~~o..,.L--t-/ scrib~n ~~rn:b:r;e~;,-:cJdary PugJ.ic, in and for, e State of, residi ' i , on the 6'J1'-day of () A} .h e .J .~ MARfl YN KAMCHEFF MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES 6-29-07 · . CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 1 yth day of February, 2004, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Notice of Application documents. This information was sent to: Surrounding Property Owners See Attached (Signature of Sender)-,,: ,...c;......=---I::::..,.-t=----,,-<O-=-=-----.L.------------~ ~N KA " . ~~ ......... 41~·." STATE OF WASHINGT SS COUNTY OF KING : ~ •• ~;.~\SSION~ ••• ~'" ,. ··o~· +..0 •• \~ ~ : :·u ",or"'-'9L ~\"'\'\ ~ ~: r m: ~ '-• -._ en-~ '-• /:l • r ~ ~ \ USlIC : : I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Patrick Roduin ~/,,,i····~:.?9-07 .... ···o~j signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act"P.Pj:i~Ait\~~-- purposes mentioned in the instrument. .","""" .................. ... Dated: 03/(),5/oV Notary (Print): ___ --;.;MA~R;.;;:IL:~YN~KA~M;:;:;CH~EFF;:±::~::_:=_----------- My appointment expires: MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES 6-29-07 Annexation Prezone template -affidavit of service by mailing 1523059032 MR V ANGARD -RENTON C/O MORRIS PIHA REAL ESTATE PO BOX 53290 BELLEVUE WA 98015 1523059015 CARLO JOSEPH N 28833 REDONDO SHORES DR S DES MOINES WA 98198 1523059177 CHAUSSEE EDWARD C+CYNTHIA A 20924 284TH A V SE MAPLE VALLEY W A 98059 1523059048 BELTRAN RICARDO Q 2108 BLAINE SE RENTON W A 98056 2816300030 GUMSERA W 13640 SE 135TH ST RENTON W A 98059 6928000460 LUEDTKE DOUGLAS E+SHANNON M 14018 SE 135TH ST RENTON W A 98059 2525000080 SIMMONS DANIEL A 204 BREMERTON AV NE RENTON W A 98059 1523059082 BUSCH FREDERICK L & JUDY R 13843 SE 132ND ST RENTON W A 98059 2525500360 FLAIG TERRANCE L PO BOX 3106 RENTON W A 98056 3863500030 JOHNSTON GEORGE E+EMIL Y S 13558 139TH PL SE RENTON W A 98059 1523059104 CHASE LARRY & JOANNE PMB 138 20825 STATE ROUTE 410 E BONNEY LAKE W A 98390 6928000290 LAMB ROS B & LINDA M 10932 NE 49TH ST KIRKLAND W A 98033 6928000520 GALUSHA DICK & ELAINE 1051 SHINE RD PORT LUDLOW W A 98365 2816300040 CLUPHFWL 13632 SE 135TH ST RENTON W A 98059 2816300020 HINES JOHN J 13648 SE 135TH ST RENTON W A 98059 5182100042 PRATHER SUSAN E 12905 136TH A V SE RENTON W A 98059 6928000160 ARCHER LOLA L 14004 SE 133RD ST RENTON W A 98059 2525500390 DORER GERALD C+SUSAN R 151 BREMERTON PL NE RENTON W A 98059 2525500400 GULLEKSON EDWARD D+SANDRA L POBOX 3104 RENTON W A 98056 2525500330 LAZCANO GILDARDO 179 BREMERTON PL NE RENTON W A 98059 1523059044 LINDBERG PHILIP R 1436-B PETERSON SWAMP RD COLVILLEWA 99114 6928000010 LEA IVYL T 7443 NE 123RD PL KIRKLAND W A 98034 6928000140 RIGORAB 14018 SE 133RD RENTON WA 98059 6928000330 DEMBOWSKI ALFRED S 14010 SE 134TH RENTON W A 98059 2525000110 KNAUSS HARRY A 108 BREMERTON A V RENTON W A 98059 6928000200 SCHUBERT V ALENE 14025 SE 133RD RENTON WA 98059 6928000130 BAMFORD ROBERT E+NANCY J 14024 SE 133RD RENTON W A 98059 2525500720 FERNWOOD NORTH HOMEOWNERS A PO BOX 2364 RENTON WA 98056 2525000130 HOLSTINE PAUL F+DANA C 103 BREMERTON PL SE RENTON WA 98059 1523059205 LINDBERG PAUL A l3836 SE 131ST RENTON W A 98059 Smooth Feed Sheets™ 1523059103 RAU WALTERE+MARGARET A WIN 13243 138TH A V SE RENTON W A 98059 2525500380 SHEPHERD JAMES E 157 BREMERTON PL NE RENTON W A 98059 1523059017 VA V AK SHARON LEE PO BOX 3089 RENTON W A 98056 1523059194 Y AKOBO XIONG+NOU LEE 13405 138TH A V SE RENTON W A 98059 1523059036 BALES SELF STORAGE PO BOX3015 RENTON W A 98059 1523059107 BEHAN DA VID L 13522 138TH A V SE RENTON W A 98059 2525000100 BUSH DAVID A+SANDRA A 120 BREMERTON A V SE RENTON W A 98059 2816300090 CORDER GERALD & GINA 13625 SE 135TH ST RENTON W A 98059 6928000470 . FORD STEVE B 14723 180TH PL SE RENTON W A 98059 2816300070 GIFFORD LEWIS F & M G 13616 SE 135TH ST RENTON W A 98059 e AVERV® Address Labels 2525500350 RUTLEDGE SCOTT A+ JULIE M 169 BREMERTON PL NE RENTON W A 98059 2525500300 STRICKER STEVEN A+DEENA M 156 BREMERTON PL NE RENTON W A 98059 2525500320 " WONG GLEN W.K.+WONG,TESSIE 185 BREMERTON PL NE RENTON W A 98059 2816300010 ANDERSON STEVEN D+KIMBERL Y 13656 SE 135TH ST RENTON W A 98059 6928000030 BATSON JUANITA M 14017 SE 132ND ST RENTON W A 98059 1523059079 BELMONDO JAMES A 13220 138TH AV SE RENTON W A 98059 3863500020 CERRILLO FERNANDO+LINDA 13564 139TH PL SE RENTON W A 98059 3863500080 DA VIS JEFFERY W & SHERRI R 13561 139TH PL SE RENTON W A 98059 2816300100 FOWLER COLLIN E+CHRISTINA 13631 SE 135TH ST RENTON W A 98059 1523059207 GOERES KARL W JR+CHERI L 13116 138TH AV SE RENTON W A 98059 Use template for 5160® 1523059024 SCHERERDV BOX 2353 RENTON WA 98056 2816300120 USHER DAVID R+DENISE A 13643 SE 135TH ST RENTON W A 98059 1523059217 YAHNCLYDE 14100 SE 132ND RENTON W A 98059 2525000600 BAKER KEITH A+REBEKAH M 129 BREMERTON A V SE RENTON W A 98059 6928000040 BEGALKA BRENT E+KAREN L 14023 SE 132ND ST RENTON W A 98059 1523059035 BLISS VIOLET F 330 BREMERTON A V NE RENTON W A 98059 6928000150 COOK FRANK J 14012 SE 133RD RENTON W A 98059 2525000580 DIAMBRI KATHY L 102 VASHON A V SE RENTON W A 98059 1523059144 FROST PATRICIA L 13528 138TH A V SE RENTON W A 98059 2525000120 HAGEDORN CHARLES P+DEBRA J 100 BREMERTON PL SE RENTON W A 98059 Laser Smooth Feed Sheets™ 1523059213 HAGERMAN CLARA 13129 138TH AV SE RENTON W A 98059 1523059046 HAMBLIN MARYELLEN 15230 SE 142ND PL RENTON W A 98059 2525500290 HENDRICKSON JON MORGAN 150 BREMERTON PL NE RENTON W A 98059 2525000060 JOHNSON SANDRA LEE 216 BREMERTON A V SE RENTON W A 98059 1523059021 LANG RICHARD P 4118 NE 24TH ST RENTON W A 98059 1523059018 LUCAS JEAN W 13823 SE 132ND RENTON W A 98059 2816300050 OLEARYMB 13624 SE 135TH RENTON W A 98059 2525500370 PHILLIPS CHERYL 161 BREMERTONPLNE RENTON W A 98059 2816300110 RIEDl J C 13635 SE 135TH ST RENTON W A 98059 3863500070 THOMPSON BRADLEY K +LlSSA C 13559 139TH PL SE RENTON WA 98059 8 AVERV® Address Labels 2525500250 HALSEY PETER J 101 BREMERTON PL NE RENTON W A 98059 1523059214 HAMPSHIRE MICHAEL L 13625 SE 131ST ST RENTON W A 98059 2525000070 HOY MARY MARGARET 210 BREMERTON AV SE RENTON W A 98059 6928000020 JONES DOUGLAS H+SHARON R 14011 SE 132ND ST RENTON W A 98059 2525000570 LEICK MICHAEL W+ROSE M 108 VASHON AV SE RENTON W A 98059 2816300130 MARZIEW 13505 138TH A V SE RENTON W A 98059 2525500240 PARKER LANCE WADE mLlA DlA 4403 NE 1 ST PL RENTON W A 98059 1523059192 PIPPIN CORTESS D 310 BREMERTON AV NE RENTON W A 98059 3863500060 SKORUP A STEVEN G+MYRLE L 13557 139TH PL SE RENTON W A 98059 6928000170 TREADWELL RENE+BISHAI LILY 14005 SE 133RD ST RENTON W A 98059 Use template for 5160® 1523059211 HAMBLIN DONALD E+MARY ELLEN 15230 SE 142ND PL RENTON W"A 98059 1523059037 HARGRAVES CHARLES 13820 SE 132ND ST RENTON: W A 98059 3863500050 JAY GERARD 13550 139TH PL SE RENTON W A 98059 2816300060 KERSTETTER DONALD E 13620 SE 135TH ST RENTON W A 98059 1523059142 LEROY MICHAEL J+KERRI L 13504 138TH AV SE RENTON W A 98059 3863500090 MEDZEGIAN PAMELA L 13567 139TH PLSE RENTON W A 98059 3863500040 PETERSON ALEXA A 13554 139TH PL SE RENTON W A 98059 1523059193 RA TZSCH CHARLES G 320 BREMERTON A V NE RENTON W A 98059 1523059016 STUTH RICHARD E 14113 SE 136TH RENTON W A 98059 1523059030 VUEFUE 13004 136TH A V SE RENTON W A 98059 Laser ·Smooth Feed Sheets™ 1523059143 WELCH KELLY LYNN 13512 138TH A V SE RENTON W A 98059 1523059005 FOTHERINGILL JEFFERY W 13409 138TH A V SE RENTON W A 98059 6928000480 JORDAN DAVID R 14004 SE 135TH ST RENTON W A 98059 3863500010 NAKANO TERESA 13568 139TH PL SE . RENTON W A 98059 2525000590 PURDY ELIZABETH C 123 BREMERTON AV SE RENTON W A 98059 2525500310 TELETNIK KAMILLA 170 BREMERTON PL NE RENTON W A 98059 2525000750 STARK BEN G & DARRYL J POBOX 98638 SEATTLE WA 98198 6928000630 V ANGEYSTEL ROBERT+CHERYL 25818 GOLD BEACH DR SW VASHON W A 98070 Anthony G1azewski 13225 138th Ave. SE Renton, W A 98059 AVERY® Address Labels 2816300140 ANDERSON ARNE C+HAGERMAN DANIELLEC 13521 138TH AV SE RENTON W A 98059 2525500260 HOWINGH 104 BREMERTON PL NE RENTON W A 98059 1523059223 LINDBERG TIMOTHY J 13845 SE 131ST ST RENTON W A 98059 1523059095 OCKWELL RICHARD J+KAREN E 13225 138TH A V SE RENTON W A 98059 2525500340 SCHRADER-NADA KATHLEEN S 173 BREMERTON PL NE RENTON W A 98059 2525500280 TRAN CHUONG M+TIEN G 116 BREMERTON PL RENTON W A 98059 5182100049 LIBERTY RIDGE LLC 9125 10TH A V S SEATTLE WA 98108 1523059075 BABOLDASHTIAN M S 2452 N RUTLAND CT WICHITA KS 67226 Charlie Conner 4728 194th Ave. SE Issaquah, WA 98027 Use template for 5160® ·2525000090 ANDERSON NANCY P+DA VID C 126 BREMERTON A V SE RENTON WA 98059 6928000490 JOHNSON KYLE 14005 SE 135TH ST RENTON W A 98059 2525500270 MILLIGAN DAN 110 BREMERTON PL NE RENTON W A 98059 6928000190 PUGET COLONY PROPERTIES LLC 14010 SE 134TH ST RENTON W A 98059 6928000500 SPENCER RICHARD A+PAMELA D 14013 SE 135TH ST RENTON W A 98059 6928000640 BRANDT CORY RICHARD+BRANDT CINDY JOY 3038 198TH AV SE SAMMAMISH WA 98075 6928000180 GORDON CYNTHIA DE ARMENT 14861 WALLINGFORD A V N SHORELINE WA 98133 6928000450 HARBIN JAMES P+SHARON E 21304 HWY 99 WOODINVILLE W A 98072 Laser CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 1 th day of February, 2004, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Notice of Application documents. This information was sent to: Surrounding Property Owners See Attached STATE OFWASHI SS COUNTY OF KING I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Patrick Roduin signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act~~~iii;~~g~ffg:: purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: o31oshv Notary (Print): ___ ---r.MA~R;.;;;IJ.:;;,;,\'N;,;:::;KAMCHEFF==:===_=_=_:::::__---------- My appointment expires: MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES 6-29-07 Carlo Annexation Prezone LUA-04-009, ECF, R (Prezone) template -affidavit of service by mailing NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON.SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) DATE: February 17, 2004 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-Q4.Q09, ECF. R (Prezone) APPLICATION NAME: CARLO ANNEXATION PREZONE PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant for the Carlo Annexatlon has requested that the City prezone the subject 37.acre site In advance of annexation, pursuant to RCW 35A.14.330, 80 that zoning will be in place at the time the subject site comeS Into the City. The City is proposing R-8 zoning for the site since this is consistent with the current Residential Single FamUy land use designation shown on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. The proposed prezone is considered to be a non·project action under SEPA. PROJECT LOCATION: The proposed 37 acre ML" shaped Cano Annexation site that Is the subject of this proposed R-8 prezonlng is located between 136'" Avenue SE on the west, 140111 Avenue SE on the east, NE 3"' Street, if extended on the north. and, SE 135111 Street on the south. It is immediately east of the proposed Tydico Site Annexation and assumes that Tydico will be brought into the City before it annexes. OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON~SIGNIFICANCE (DNS): As the Lead Agency. the City of Renlon has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed non·project action. Therefore. as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110, lhe City of Renton is using the Optional DNS process to give notice that a DNS is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non·Significance (ONS). A 14·day appeal perlod will follow the issuance of the ONS. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: February 13, 2004 February 17, 2004 Permits/Review Requested: Other Permits which may be required: Requested Studies: Location where application may be reviewed: PUBLIC HEARING: CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Land Use: Environmental (SEPA) Review on proposed R.8 Prezone and Prezone NlA N/A Planning/Building/Public Works Department, Development Services Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055 Council accepted the proposed 50/50 Direct Petition to annex at its public hearing on February 9, 2004 and held the first of two required public hearings on the proposed R-8 prezonlng on this same date. Propo •• d MItigation Measures: ~~v~n:~~e~~: ~:~i~~e~~~~:l:~~~~~~~:/l:I=~na~a~~e:'c:~:~n:~n~~i~ai~s ~~:i~~~h~I:;~ation site specific development proposal Is made under R~8 zoning at some time in the future on ~e sUbJ~t annexation s~:,f a g~~~en~Do~i~eDabove application must be submitted In writing to Don Erickson, Project Manager, Strategic Planning vs n, epartment, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055, by 5:00 PM on March 4, 2004 If au have ~uestlons about this proposal, or wtsh to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by m~n %antact the ,a;:~~c~~~a~;rthl:-":OJ:~O submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and Wili be notifie~ of CONTACT PERSON: DON ERICKSON (425) 430-6581 PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION u:; The subject site is located within the ReSidential Single Family (RS) Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designation. The proposed R·8 prezone is consistent with this land use designation, as well as relevant land use policies adopted in February, 1995 and amended in August, 2000. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~'r If you would like to be m~de a party of record to receiVe further information on this proposed pro·ect com lete this form and retum to: CIty of Renton, Development Planning, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, tvA·9805~. Environmental Documents that Evaluate the proposed Project: Environmental Checklist dated February4, 2004. , Development Regulations used For Project Mitigation: This non·project action will be subject to the City's SEPA Ordinance and Development Regulations and other applicable codes and regulations as appropriate. .............. " .... ''''', ._-.. ,,~f<A4.i "III L. :_ <»" ........ C~ " :-J"" •• ~..;.SS'ON ~j: •• ~'I, .. ~ •. -t:!'. '"fA)' ~. , ; :~ .. \IOTAb ~ ... ~ ~ Fllo NoJNamo: LUA-04-009, ECF, R (Prozone) Carlo Annexation Prezone NAME: ADDRESS: _____________________ _ TELEPHONE NO.: ________ _ , :() \' 'Ty i1\~ ~ ~ : -._ f/)i ~ CERTIFICATION ~ (/) ... ,oUBL\C i : "~:"\" .. ~:: , ~" 6. .., •• .... 0.: " ~.A·· •• ·29·0'.···h': Cl ~ ··"o··········~....,--' •••• , F WAS\'+." ........... -• 1-\'\\\\"" ...... ~ I, ' hereby certify that copies of the above document were posted!2Y 91e in ? conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on ref?r({({fj'-Idj :?i:t2¢--. Signed:7YJ~ .,f~~ ATTEST: Subscribed anryornb:;fore me, a Notary Public, in and for thett;Of =-"--'-. -. -t)' Washington residing in W~ t on the ,I(P day of "'7?2~ O<.C(YI MARilYN KAMCHEFF MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES 6-29-07 NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIG~IFICANCE (DNS) DATE: February 17, 2004 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-04-009, ECF, R (Prezone) APPLICATION NAME: CARLO ANNEXATION PREZONE PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant for the Carlo Annexation has requested that the City prezone the subject 37-acre site in advance of annexation, pursuant to RCW 35A.14.330, so that zoning will be in place at the time the subject site comes into the City. The City is proposing R-8 zoning for the site since this is consistent with the current Residential Single Family land use designation shown on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. The proposed prezone is considered to be a non-project action under SEPA. PROJECT LOCATION: The proposed 37 acre "L" shaped Carlo Annexation site that is the subject of this proposed R-8 prezoning is located between 136th Avenue SE on the west, 140th Avenue SE on the east, NE 3rd Street, if extended on the north, and, SE 135th Street on the south. It is immediately east of the proposed Tydico Site Annexation and assumes that Tydico will be brought into the City before it annexes. OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (DNS): As the Lead Agency, the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed non-project action. Therefore, as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110, the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS process to give notice that a DNS is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS are integrated into a single comment period. Therewill be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance (DNS). A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS. . PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: February 13, 2004 February 17, 2004 Permits/Review Requested: Other Permits which may be required: Requested Studies: Location where application may be reviewed: PUBLIC HEARING: CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Land Use: Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: Notice of Application.doc Environmental (SEPA) Review on proposed R-8 Prezone and Prezone N/A N/A Planning/Building/Public Works Department, Development Services Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055 Council accepted the proposed 50/50 Direct Petition to annex at its public hearing on February 9, 2004 and held the first of two required public hearings on the proposed R-8 prezoning on this same date. The subject site is located within the Residential Single Family (RS) Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designation. The proposed R-8 prezone is consistent with this land use designation, as well as relevant land use policies adopted in February, 1995 and amended in August, 2000. Environmental Checklist dated February 4, 2004. This non-project action will be subject to the City's SEPA Ordinance and Development Regulations and other applicable codes and regulations as appropriate. Proposed Mitigation Measures: The analysis of the proposed non-project action does not reveal any adverse environmental impacts requiring mitigation above and beyond existing code provisions. However, mitigation may be necessary and may be imposed at the time of a site specific development proposal is made under R-8 zoning at some time in the future on the subject annexation site. Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Don Erickson, Project Manager, Strategic Planning Division, EDNSP Department, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055, by 5:00 PM on March 4, 2004. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact the Project Manager. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. I CONTACT PERSON: DON ERICKSON (425) 430-6581 I PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION I If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project, complete " this form and return to: City of Renton, Development Planning, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. File NoJName: LUA-04-009. ECF. R (Prezone) Carlo Annexation Prezone NAME: " _________ -'-___ ----,----, ___________ _ ADDRESS: _____________________________ __ TELEPHONE NO.: ___________ _ Notice of Application.doc CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM Date: February 17, 2004 To: File From: Don Erickson Subject: Carlo Annexation Prezone LUA-04-009, ECF, R (Prezone) The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on March 9,2004. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. Please contact me, at 430-6581 if you have any questions. Acceptance Memo.doc vo,-\-·oo~ lj)~()"-~ be ----------------------~~~ -~~----------------, CITY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION MASTER APPLICATION OWNER(S) Note: If there is more than on legal owner, please attach an additional notarized Master application to each owner. NAME: CITY OF RENTON \S.~~~ ADDRESS: 1055 South Grady Way City: Renton ZIP: 98055 TELEPHONE NUMBER: 425-430-6581 CONTACT PERSON/APPLICANT NAME: Don Erickson ADDRESS: 1055 South Grady Way City: Renton ZIP: 98055 TELEPHONE NUMBER: 425-430-6581 PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: R-8 Pre zoning of the 37-acre Carlo Annexation site located between 136th Avenue SE on the west, 140th A venue SE on the east, NE 3rd Street, if extended on the north, and SE 13Sth Street, if extended, on the south. PROPERTYIPROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION and ZIP CODE: Please see attached map KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER: 152305 9005; 9015-9018; 9024; 9030; 9039; 9046; 9079; 9095; 9103; 9104; 9115; 9194; and 9211-9215. DEVELOPMENT PU"NNING CITY 0;:: RENTON FEB \.J Z:n:i Document2\d \ElI\t: r-t: l\i ~ n PROJECT INFORMATION (cont) EXISTING LAND USE(S): Low density single-family detached housing and vacant parcels. ~ PROPOSED LAND USE(S): Single-family detached housing at densities of up to 8 units per net acre. NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES (estimated): N/A EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: RS -Residential Single Family PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: RS -Residential Single Family EXISTING ZONING: King County R-4, 4 units per gross acre PROPOSED ZONING: Renton R-8, 8 units per net acre SITE AREA in SQ. Ff: 37-acres PROJECT VALUE: N/A IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? No IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA? Site does contain some wetland areas. LEGAL DESCR...c.c. fION OF PROPERTY (Attach st;parate sheet if needed) TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES Check all application types that apply --City staff will detennine fees. ANNEXATION $ SUBDIVISION REZONE $ SPECIAL PERMIT $ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ TEMPORARY PERMIT $ SHORT PLAT $ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ TENTATIVE PLAT $ SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ PRELIMINARY PLAT $ GRADE & FILL PERMIT $ FINAL PLAT $ (No. Cu. Y ds: ) VARIANCE $ (from Section: $ PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT $ WAIVER $ PRELIMINAR Y ROUTINE VEGETATION FINAL MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ BINDING SITE PLAN MOBaEHOMEPARKS $ SHORELINE REVIEWS: SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ CONDITIONAL USE $ VARIANCE $ EXEMPTION $ NO CHARGE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ REVISION AFFIDA VIT OF OWNERSHIP I, (Print Name) Rebecca lind, on behalf of City of Renton , declare that I am (please check one) _ the owner of the property involved in this application, -X-the authorized representative to act for the property owner (please attach proof of authorization), and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. . I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be hislher/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. (Name of OwnerlRClpresentative) v'ktMnJ Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary (Print) ____________ _ (Signature of OwnerlRepresentative) My appointment expires: _________ _ (THIS SECTION TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY STAFF.) City File Number: ____ _ ECF SA R SHPL CU LLA PP FP TP AAD W FPUD . SM SME MHP BSP A V SP RVMP CPA TOTAL FEES: $ _______ _ TOTAL POSTAGE PROVIDED: $ ____ _ Document2\d LEGAL DESCRIPTH!ll~· OF PROPERTY (Attach separal-v sheet if needed) TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES Check all application types that apply --City staff will determine fees. ANNEXATION $ SUBDIVISION REZONE $ SPECIAL PERMIT $ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ TEMPORARY PERMIT $ SHORT PLAT $ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ TENT A TIVE PLAT $ SITE PLAN APPRO V AL $ PRELIMINAR Y PLAT $ GRADE & FILL PERMIT $ FINAL PLAT $ (No. Cu. Y ds: ) VARIANCE $ (from Section: $ PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT $ WAIVER $ PRELIMINAR Y ROUTINE VEGETATION FINAL MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ BINDING SITE PLAN MOBILE HOME PARKS $ SHORELINE REVIEWS: SUBST ANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ CONDITIONAL USE $ VARIANCE $ EXEMPTION $ NO CHARGE ENVIRONMENT AL REVIEW $ REVISION AFFIDA VIT OF OWNERSHIP I. (Print Name) Rebecca Lind, on behalf of City of Renton , declare that I am (please check one) _ the owner of the property involved in this application, -5(:: the authorized representative to act for the property owner (please attach proof of authorization), and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith are in all respects true and COITect to the best of my knowledge and belief. I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington (Name of Owner/Rapresentative) ~nJ Notary (Print) ____________ _ (Signature of Owner/Representative) My appointment expires: _________ _ (THIS SECTION TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY STAFF.) City File Number: ____ _ ECF SA R SHPL CU LLA PP FP TP SP RVMP V AAD W FPUD SM SME MHP BSP A CPA TOTAL FEES: $ _______ _ TOTAL POSTAGE PROVIDED: $ ____ _ FEBi J 2004 Document2\d RECEiVED February 9, 2004 PUBLIC HEARING Annexation: Carlo, 136th Ave SE & 140th Ave SE Renton City Council Minutes Page 2 In conclusion, Mr. Erickson stated that the annexation proposal is generally consistent with Renton policies and Boundary Review Board criteria, and except for parks, no major service issues have been idenified. Responding to Councilman Clawson's inquiry regarding potential flooding problems, Mr. Erickson stated that Public Works staff recommends that any development on the site be required to adhere to the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual stmdards. He confirmed that drainage problems will be identified and addressed when development occurs at the project level. Public comment was invited. Eleanor Bagley, 11860 142nd Ave. SE, Renton, 98059, stated that her property is located adjacent to the Johnson property, and expressed concern that costs will increase as a result of the annexation. She also noted the current traffic problems, and indicated that they will get worse as development occurs. There being no further public comment, it was MOVS) BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC MEETING. CARRIED. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL: ACCEPT THE JOHNSON 10% NOTICE OF INTENT TO ANNEX PETITION, AUTHORIZE CIRCULATION OF THE 60% PETITION TO ANNEX (REINSTATED ASSESSED VALUE METHOD), AMEND THE SOUTHERN BOUNDARY TO INCLUDE THE ABUTTING 2.39-ACRE BIGELOW PROPERTY, REQUIRE ADOPTION OF R-8 ZONING CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, AND REQUIRE THAT PROPERTY OWNERS ASSUME A PROPORTIONAL SHARE OF THE CITY'S BONDED INDEBTEDNESS. CARRIED. This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in accordance with local and State laws, Mayor Keolker-Wheeler opened the public hearing to consider the 50% Petition to Annex and R-8 prezoning for the proposed 37-acre Carlo Annexation located between 136th Ave. SE on the west and 140th Ave. SE on the east, and SE 132nd St. on the north and SE 135th St., if extended, on the south. Senior Planner Don Erickson reported that King County certified the signatures on the petition on December 1,2003, and he pointed out that this site cannot be annexed into Renton before the Tydico Annexation is completed. He stated that the site contains 18 single-family dwellings, and is essentially flat with a slope on the southwest corner. Maplewood Creek traverses the southwest corner of the site, and an existing wetland spills over into the northwest corner. Mr. Erickson noted that public services are provided by FireDistrict #25, Renton water and sewer, and Renton School District. Mr. Erickson explained that existing King County zoning is R-4 (four units per gross acre), and R-8 (eight dwelling units per net acre) zoning is proposed, as the site is designated Residential Single Family under the City's Comprehensive Plan. Reviewing the fiscal impacts of the proposed annexation, he indicated that the City will realize a surplus of $4,727 at full development, assuming an increase to 209 single-family homes and a new mme value of $290,000. The one-time parks acquisition and development cost is estimated at $11 1,182.16. February 9, 2004 Renton City Council Minutes Page 3 In conclusion, Mr. Erickson stated that the proposed annexation will further City business goals, is consistent with City policies for annexation, am meets Boundary Review Board objectives. He noted that except for parks, no major services issues were identified. Responding to Councilman Persson's inquiry regarding the status of the Tydico Annexation, Mr. Erickson reported that the applicant is worJ.ing on moving the existing use off the site. Public comment was invited. Charlie Conner, 846 I 08th Ave. NE, Bellevue, 98004, acknowledged that people both within and outside of the annexation area have enjoyed the open space, and he realizes that it is difficult for them to see the density of their neighborhood change. He indicated that the proposed annexation and development will result in better public services, a safer street, flood control, and more parks. Mr. Conner stated that the Growth Managemem Act mandates that most growth must be inside the urban growth boundary, and a traffic study has determined there is adequate traffic capacity to serve the new communities. Mr. Conner also noted that some material was moved to one of the properties, and a permit is pending with King County. Anthony J. Glazewski, 13225 138th Ave. SE, Renton, 98059, opposed the proposed annexation, and claimed that the fiscal impact analysis figures quoted at the last public meeting on this matter indicated that the Citywould realize a deficit rather than a surplus. He commented on the inadequate park at the developer's nearby Sienna subdivision, and on the safety issues associated with "roller coaster road" or 138th Ave. SE. Roy Vavak, 13418 138th Ave. SE, Renton, 98056, supported the proposed annexation, saying that the traffic problems will be better handled after development. Mr. Vavak reported that he toured the Sienna subdivision and was impressed with the quality of the construction. Additionally, he highlighted the benefits of being able to access a sewer system if needed. August Gumser, 13640 SE 135th St., Renton, 98059, stated that the type and number of houses that are to be built next to the current housing will adversely affect property values and the current residents' way of life. Claiming that the proposed zoning will double Renton's permit and property tax receipts while having a minimal impact on the additional services required, Mr. Gumser stressed that money has become more important than the peope. Stephanie Glazewski, 13225 138th Ave. NE, Renton, 98059, expressed her concern that trees would be removed, leaving her with an unobstructed view of the new houses. She also expressed her concern that the new development will cause an increase in troffic, and negatively affect the quiet surroundings. Eileen Cluphf, 13632 SE 135th St., Renton, 98059, opposed the proposed annexation, and stated that construction has already started. Pointing out that the land slopes into her property, she expressedconcern about flooding, and questioned whether a retaining wall will be constructed between the current and new housing. February 9, 2004 Renton City Council Minutes Page 4 In response to citizen concerns regarding notification of the pending annexation, Mr. Erickson stated that 104 people within the siteand in the surrounding area were notified of the public hearing. He pointed out that the site is still within King County, and any construction operations are King County authorized. Regarding the fiscal impact analysis, Mr. Erickson indicated that although the figures have changed somewhat since the previous public meeting on this matter on August 4,2003, a surplus of$I,285 at full development was estimated at that time compared to a surplus of $4,727 now. Mr. Erickson attributed this to different evy rates and an increase in the estimated number of units at full development from 200 to 209. In regards to the development process, Mr. Erickson explained that annexations are exempt from SEPA (State Environmental Policy Act), and are considered non-project activities. When a project proposal is submitted, concerned parties are notified of the comment period and signs are posted at the site. The City's Environmental Review Committee reviews the project, and the determination can be appealed. He stnssed that public comment will be solicited at the project level; however, the site must first be annexed by Renton. At the request of Council Corman, Ms. Cluphfand Mr. Gumser pointed out the location of their properties on the annexation site map. John Skochdopole, Conner Homes Company, 846 108th Ave. NE, Bellevue, 98004, stated that five tot-lot parks are planned for the Carlo property, and full curb, gutter, and sidewalk improvements are planned along Duvall Ave. NE (138th Ave. SE). Regarding the gradng activity currently underway, Mr. Skochdopole explained that material was moved onto the site and stockpiled, and a permit is pending with King County. In response to Councilman Corman's inquiry, Mr. Skochdopole stated that a stormwater retention facili)' is planned for the Maplewood Creek area at the southwest corner of the site. Mayor Keolker-Wheeler pointed out that the City is required by the State Growth Management Act to annex property up to the urban growth boundary, and the proposed annexation site is within the City's potential annexation area. There being no further public comment, it was MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. MOVED BY CLA WSON, SECONDED BY PALMER, COUNCIL ACCEPT THE 50% DIRECT PETITION TO ANNEX FOR THE CARLO ANNEXATION, AND AUTHORIZE THEADMINISTRATION TO SUBMIT A NOTICE OF INTENT TO ANNEX PACKAGE TO THE BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD FOR KING COUNTY AND PREPARE A PREZONE ORDINANCE FOR R-8 ZONING FOR CONSIDERATION AT A SECOND PUBLIC HEARING.* Councilman Corman noted that the proposed R-8 zoning for the site seems to be compatible with the zoning of the surrounding areas, and he questioned whether zoning compatibility issues would be reviewed during the development process. Mr. Erickson pointedout that Renton's Comprehensive Plan land use designation only allows R-8 and Residential Manufactured Homes zoning in this area, and confirmed that any compatibility issues can be commented on at the project level. *MOTlON CARRIED. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION ,I;N,YIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST , t~·F Rt:NTON City of Renton Development Services Division FEB -i :i 2004 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 1"qf&FfiJM~OF CHECKLIST: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21 C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the :_{ef~rf?F9~§',i~~.Hl~~ checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "pr?perty or site" should be read aSI~proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. H:\EDN$P\~nnexations\Carlo\SEPA Checklist(rev),doc02/03/04 ~'a~l;itnfil:U SEPA Checklist for Carlo Annexation PreLI"me 02/03/04 A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: 2 Carlo Annexation Prezone. The proposed non-project action is to prezone the subject 37 -acre site R-8, (Residential Single Family), 8 du/net acre zoning upon annexation. The site is currently zoned R-4, 4 du/gross acre in King County. 2. Name of applicant: City of Renton 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Economic Development, Neighborhoods, & Strategic Planning Renton City Hall - 6th Floor 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Contact Person: Don Erickson, Senior Planner Phone: (425) 430-6581 4. Date checklist prepared: February 3, 2004 5. Agency requesting checklist: . City of Renton 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): NI A Non-project Action 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. NI A Non-project Action 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. N/A Non-project Action 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. Annexation applicant has submitted a pre-application with the City of Renton for a future single- family subdivision using R-8 zoning. 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. City Council Approval H:\EDNSP\PAA\Annexations\Carlo\SEPA Checklist(rev).doc 2 SEPA Checklist for Carlo Annexation Prewne 02/03/04 3 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. This non-project action includes prezoning approximately 37-acres within Renton's East Plateau Potential Annexation Area that are currently being considered for annexation using the 50/50 Direct Petition method of annexation. Under RCW 43.21.C.222 annexations are specifically exempted from SEPA. RCW 35.A.14.330-340 provides for rezoning potential annexation areas. The proposed prezoning would allow up to 209 units whereas the current King County R-4 zone would allow up 157 units with bonuses or TORs. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The annexation site that is the subject of the proposed non-project prezone abuts the City on portions of its northern and western boundaries. 136th Avenue SE (Bremerton Avenue NE), if extended, would define the area's western boundary, and 140th Avenue SE, if extended, would define its eastern boundary. Its northernmost boundary is SE 130th Street, if extended, and its southernmost boundary is SE 135th Street, if extended. 138th Avenue SE bisects the middle of the two-block area. B. EN~RONMENTALELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); flat, rolling, hil/y, steep slopes, mountainous, other _____ _ Non-project action. The site however is relatively flat. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) Non-project action; N/A c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Non-project action; N/A d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. Non-project action; N/A e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fil/. Non-project action; NI A H:\EDNSP\PAA\Annexations\Carlo\SEPA Checklist(rev).doc 3 SEP A Checklist for Carlo Annexation Prewne 02/03/04 4 f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Non-project action; N/A g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Non-project action; NI A h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Non-project action; N/A 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, and industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Non-project action, NI A b. Are there any off-site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. Non-project NI A c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Non-project N/A 3. WATER a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, and wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Non-project action; NI A 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Non-project action; N/A 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Non-project action; N/A H :\EDNSP\P AA \Annexations\Carlo\SEPA Checklist(rev) .doc 4 SEP A Checklist for Carlo Annexation Prewne 02/03/04 5 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Non-project action; NI A 5) Does the proposal lie within a 1 ~O-year flood plain? If so, note location on the site plan. Non-project action; NI A 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. Non-project action; N/A b. Ground Water: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Non-project action; NI A 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals ... ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Non-project action; N/A c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters, If so, describe. Non-project action; NI A 2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Non-project action; N/A d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Non-project action; NI A 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: X deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other )(__ evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other H:\EDNSP\PAA\Annexations\Carlo\SEPA Checklist(rev).doc 5 SEP A Checklist for Carlo Annexation Prewne 02/03/04 )( shrubs _-r ___ grass __ pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other __ water plants: water lily, eel grass, mi/foil, other __ other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Non-project action; Nt A c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Non-project action; NtA 6 d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Non-project action; Nt A 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals, which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: hawk, heron, eagle,@ngbifdS}other _______ _ Mammals~ bear, elk, beaver, other -:------:-_______ _ Fish: bass:sarrnon, trout, herring, shellfish, other ______ _ b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Non-project action; NtA c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain Non-project action; NtA d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Non-project action; NtA 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Non-project action; Nt A b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. Non-project action; Nt A H:\EDNSP\PAA\Annexations\Carlo\SEPA Checklist(rev).doc 6 SEP A Checklist for Carlo Annexation Prezone 02/03/04 7 c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Non-project action; N/A 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. Non-project action; NI A 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Non-project action; N/A 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Non-project action; N/A b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Non-project action; N/A 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Non-project action; N/A 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Non-project action; N/A 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No c. Describe any structures on the site. There currently are 18 single-family detached structures on the site. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? H:\EDNSP\PAA\Annexations\Carlo\SEPA Checklist(rev).doc 7 SEPA Checklist for Carlo Annexation PreLone 02110/04 8 Non-project act jon. Presumably most if not all of these structures will be removed. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? R-4, 4 units per gross acre (King County) f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Urban Residen,tial 4-12 dulac in King County and Residential Single Family (RS) in Renton. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Non-project action; N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Non-project action. King County zoning would allow approximately 520 persons assuming 2.5 persons per household whereas Renton's proposed R-8 zoning would allow up to 555 persons. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? Non-project action; N/A k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Non-project action; N/A I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Proposed pre-zoning will help ensure that future development is compatible with similarly zoned properties in the area. 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Non-project action. At full development proposed R-8 zoning would allow up to 222 single-family detached units on the developable portion of the site. This compares with up to 157-208 detached or attached units under King County's current R-4 zoning on the site. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Non-project action. As indicated above, up to 18 units of existing middle/upper income housing could be removed in the future. H:\EDNSP\PAA\Annexations\Carlo\SEPA Checklist(rev).doc 8 SEPA Checklist for Carlo Annexation Prezone 02/03/04 c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Non-project action; N/A 10. AESTHETICS 9 a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. Non-project action; N/A b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Non-project action; NI A c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Non-project action; NI A 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Non-project action; N/A b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Non-project legislative action. N/A c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Non-project action; NI A d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Non-project action; NI A 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Non-project action; Maplewood Park in King County is located less than V2 mile to the east of the subject prezoning site. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. Non-project action; Future development may increase pressure on existing recreational facilities in the area. The City of Renton does, however, collect a $530 per unit parks and recreation mitigation fee that would apply all future units developed in the prezone area. H :\EDNS P\P AA \Annexations\Carlo\S EPA Checklist( rev) .doc 9 SEP A Checklist for Carlo Annexation Prezone 02/03/04 10 c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Non-project action; NI A 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. Non-project action; N/A b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. Non-project action; N/A c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Non-project action; N/A 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The site is one block south of SE 128th Street, a major community arterial. 138th Avenue SE in a local collector street. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Public transit is available for future inhabitants one block to the north on SE 128th Street. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Non-project action; N/A d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private? Non-project action. Future development will include new streets and roadway improvements. However, because this is a non-project action the scope of these is not known. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate Vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. Non-project action; N/A f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. H:\EDNSP\PAA\Annexations\Carlo\SEPA Checklist(rev).doc 10 SEP A Checklist for Carlo Annexation Prezone 02110/04 11 f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Assuming a maximum of 222 units at full development in the future, it is estimated that there would be approximately 2,220 AWDTE. This compares with an estimated 2,080 AWDTE at full development under King County's current R-4 zoning on the site. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Non-project action; NI A 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Non-project action; N/A b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Non-project action; NI A 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. Non-project action; NI A b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Non-project action; The subject site is located within Renton's water and sewer service areas, however. C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part . Proponent: . City of Renton Name Printed: __ R~eb::<.e:::.;cO<..>c"",a~L=.:i.!.!n::::.d...:.;foo::..:r-,C:::.;i'-'Jty,--o"",f,-,Rc...:.e"",nc.:..:t:.::<o.!.!n _________ _ Date: October 8. 2003 H:\EDNSP\PAA\Annexations\Carlo\SEPA Checklist(rev).doc 11 SEP A Checklist for Carlo Annexation Prezone 02/03/04 D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEETS FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS 12 (These sheets should only be used for actions involving decisions on policies, plans and ro rams. You do .not need to fill out these sheets for ro·ect .actions. . Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? With possible exception of surface water runoff the proposal would not likely have any affect on the above environmental issues. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: New development resulting as a consequence of these proposed amendments will be required to comply with the City's development regulations including those pertaining to surface water management. 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? No affect on plants, animals, fish, or marine life is anticipated directly as a consequence of this non-project prezoning proposal. Future development whether under King County's current zoning or the City's proposed R-8 prezoning might displace some existing vegetation and animals such as raccoon and deer. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: None at this non-project action level. Existing critical area regulations, however, protect all critical areas within the City limits. 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? The proposed non-project action will not deplete energy or natural resources. Future project level development may impact energy or natural resources slightly but will not deplete them .. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: None are proposed at this non-project action stage. 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, flood plains, or prime farmlands? Proposal would likely not use or affect environmentally sensitive areas. This is a non-project land use action prezoning a 37-acre annexation site. H:\EDNSP\PAA\Annexations\Carlo\SEPA Checklist(rev).doc 12 SEPA Checklist for Carlo Annexation Prezone 02/03/04 13 Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: None. 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? The proposed prezoning of the 37-acre annexation site will increase compatibility with surrounding uses since it will limit future development to single-family detached' housing currently prevalent in the area. King County zoning allows both detached and attached units in its R-4 zone. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: None. 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? The proposed prezoning would allow a greater number of units than the current King County R- 4 zoning. As a consequence there is the potential for up to 2090 AWDVTE versus 1,570 AWDVTE under the current R-4 zoning. This additional 520 trips is unlikely to have noticeable impacts on transportation. Similarly, the additional 52 units under the proposed R-a prezoning is not likely to significantly increase demands on public services and utilities. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: None. 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. The proposal will not conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for protection of the environment. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: !U6tfUi tbi;oJ ,City of Renton Name Printed: _--..!....!R~e!:!be~c~c:!.!::a~L!:!i.!..!n.l::id'-, ..!.!fo::!.!r.....!t!!he~C!.!Cit.x.y.....!o:!.!..f...!.R~e~n!!:to!::!.!n!..!.-___ _ Date: ENVCHLST.DOC REVISED 6/98 January 5, 2004 H:\EDNSP\PAA\Annexations\Carlo\SEPA Checklist(rev),doc 13 o 1500 3000 Proposed C9r~I~'if'~nDexation Figure 1: Vicinity Map . ." HEI'.! ON ~'" '" m OlIO ,,~ 1 : 18000 cr-.., " Economic Development, Neighbdr~S ·~:Sta.Wg(c Planning Alex Pietsch, Administrator G. Del Rosario 15 August 2003 ---Renton City Limits c:::=J Proposed Annexation Area CARLO ANNEXATION R-8 PREZONE PROJECT NARRATIVE The applicant for the Carlo Annexation has requested that the City prezone the subject 37-acre site in advance of annexation, pursuant to RCW 35A.14.330, so that zoning will be in place at the time the subject site comes into the City. The City is proposing R-S zoning for the site since this is consistent with the current Residential Single Family land use designation shown on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. The proposed prezone is considered to be a non-project action under SEP A. The annexation itself is considered to be an exempt action under SEP A. The proposed 37-acre "L" shaped Carlo Annexation site that is the subject of this proposed R-S prezoning is located between 136th Avenue SE on the west, 140th Avenue SE on the east, NE 3rd Street, if extended on the north, and, SE 135th Street on the south. It is immediately east of the proposed Tydico Site Annexation and assumes that Tydico will be brought into the City before it annexes. Prezoning on the Tydico Annexation site is R-lO, ten units per net acre. The site is currently zoned R-4, 4 units per gross acre in King County. This zoning allows up to 6 units per acre with bonuses for energy efficiency, affordable housing, or with purchased development rights from properties outside the Urban Growth Area boundary. Because the proposed R-S zoning is based upon net acreage there is not that much difference in terms of the number of units that can be built between the two zones. The City estimates up to 222 units could be accommodated on the 34.S3 non-street portion of the annexation area using the citywide density average for the R-S zone. If one assumes 6 units per acre under King County's R-4 zoning, the number of units allowed would be 208 units, or only 14 units less than what would be allowed using the citywide R-8 zone average. FEB i j 2SG4 CARLO ANNEXATION LEGAL DESCRIPTION The southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of the northwest quarter, and the north half (1/2) of the southeast quarter of the northwest quarter, all in Section 15, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Washington; TOGETHER WITH the north half (112) of the north half (112) of the southwest quarter of the southeast quarter of the northwest quarter of said Sectign 15; and TOGETHER WITH the east 30 feet of the south half (112) of the north half (112) of the southwest quarter of the southeast quarter of the northwest quarter of said Section 15; and TOGETHER WITH the north half (112) of the southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of the northwest quarter of srud Section 15; and TOGETHER WITH the west 42 feet of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of said Section 15; LESS that portion lying southerly of the south line of said north half of the southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of the northwest quarter of said Section 15 extended easterly across 140tb Ave. S.E., to a point on the west line of Lot 49 of Puget Colony Homes, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 86 of Plats, Page 59, records of King County, Washington; and TOGETHER WITH the portion of street known as 138th Ave. S.E. lying in the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of the northwest quarter of said Section 15, said street varying in width from 20 feet to 30 feet and back to 20 feet. FEB 'j j 2004 REC~HVE[) H:\File Sys\LND -Land Subdivision & Surveying Records\LND-OI -Legal Descriptions\OO65.doc\SF\jw