The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA-04-040,.jJ.!!l il , Q.., , .~ V) -T --~ I I I I I 'I;;' I I :~;' I I 'Vl~_ _ I ~ . --~~==L------:' I ----- Y.' , "l § ~---------._---"------_.-.---\' .......... -.--.... -----'---. \ ....... --.. -:----- ---1---'-------, ... ';:'" ~ ': I ' !. t I 'I I]J' ;;',( I of! I I~ 111,d ~ III -i ,I Lt I ~ in .. .f ~ II ~i J I S . ! f j I t I ; I f t I : ~! ! . L [ j i! I . r ! . i ! i I I ) I I : I,ll' II! i f ; I 'I I 'f I :, ~p ill I ' :.. ~ '::l" ~ I 't I B j h iUI n 11 H i .. ..., ~ .. ~. .. ~!I'i II II 'III' 1'1 I i II Ii I~ I. ,11111 I' ~ IIII'!! a a ..- ·11,11 ,I I:' -I , II . , . I ,1li~ " "":1 ,II ,I I ',1,,11: t.,) f, I \.:':--·-,r I I Is "i , '. I ~ ,! ..;---t----.~ ,_ _ .. -,r. ". _ I . " '. u,..,. .,. __ 1 ~ ! [f ~I , 1--"II' : I r ili 1 [' 1-:, ~ -'--, , , ,_ 1" '" ,.\ "{>' ~. (>! , ;J1 "\ _r , ,~, 1_ !< /'. c~ 'ldil;flH 'I~, ,. :;, ~", ':Iil ~ '. !'j':>', ':~'" ~ ~ '1.01: "'J' . ;'.,' Ii' :" ~ : , . II _ " '., _ Q I I, rr'. r' I. !,' ;_ "_, ~ '( , .L \_ : ....... .' " , ~ i ~J!:\'I'li "/i. L··· .. :JI_ I I ~; r !h , I 1 I:, .J , -: 'f: ,:I!: _I : '1.'" • ~i ';'1 " I , '-I' ,. '. _, _ . """. 'I" \ '1-' L,: .' , .. 'I ' 1 I ~,' '. ,J \ --, -1 r", . r"--:,-;-i': ': 'l ~I ,-, :'1 ' ,-' \ }"'-": " ':" I , -:-! ,. ..., II· , I I J'l'. :.' ".' X-,. "'(' f -I -, ' L '!-I.' " i f I If: , ' __ I ! p:\fH>II. : 41 'i;l: '1!: ~L. 1[1:<:';,' i' l': 1 :,i-r " '''' ~:'. II i:: ! &.: "., , ",. ,~'.f--, ''!,-' I ;', ---I,' l.' : .:: ~\'-"-!--:i--; i I • J I " . I 'I i ~. \', I I II., T::r<:~'-1._ I I 1 ,,' .~ ~ (\'). '(,\' r-[~' ,/ l 'j i .. , 1 (-) r I '.11'1111 bbl: 1'1 III .' i 1 'I" r~ "II 'I I~' ~ /: 1 ;'11111'1 i:i!I:, II ,,~Ii' rp ', 0) . '\\ S,. Q ",: )t}1 ' ~ :,: . .'~ \, j ,~,:/, i i(f! " ffi . il,,I Iml ~ .' .. :/i ~. ('!, ~ . .. ~ ~: (\;, .. \ ) ;I~i' ',-L) '( ;t.;\ ) , ' .. ,1 i!l.~ ~11~111~. ' l:~j rT~) I ill 1 ~ ~ r i f ~"[ I 1 , I • I ~ rq Fli r!, rf( ! !'V 1 H"~¥I 1~_Ur ~ r .:1'1 i ~ I ! I ! I i-f f ' i . f I, I! /'IWFH p~mllHl' prl' ~ !-r! Jh ri!' III 1 I!~! !!J! lif IIi liJ'~" J.l' ' I 'Ii 'II . ! < II I • \ 1 ! ' j 1 ; i ! ; ; ! I I ! I 1 I' ! fi .. J8 j [ . l~ Ii I Ii' ~ i 1 I ,.," I I CI{ T'-i~!l 4-,) 5 'I + • <) P if { np i I' I r ~ ~.' ! 1 Ji-, ,,' ~'i' fdiH I. I!;r ( ,.1 . I 'p I 1 f r I _ ! ! r f ,1 i P r '1.-I 1 i' ! In. ~~;~I!~I~~~!R~~,~~~~~~,a~ !~ !1~:~rfrl!I;I!(flllijfJ' Ii' I /'S" 'I~ ~ •• , ( ! '( II I I If I . I IIPI W . ; • ';:a , 'II, If' h' 1· I:r rifl11~ , f" ." ) ~~ ~ ~?=~3 , l\ J! ' ..... :- \ Mo~no ~O;;~O~: i'l ;!IOf;,er ,0 ;:;y:rr.ic snape, cen'e' poiat ~-..!F~;" ,2.00 ?lan~ (i2) Cecnot:'l!..l5 crrseu;:-, to e:J~~ Di ·pi'Jnter ~.:~~; ::::1 ire'!::: one ~~'--9r~IJ:-':~·:>VB'5 ~..: '5oC"e &" pfOi.ect, L' :":-,:~"S VI':-",'C":"':J ,-s.-.e:;i.":'le:-.;;..'l:;...!.;.~-:"'::: ,r ::xisting ~!o"i:ir,g 'v sove one :':-:'ie:t Base Did ~ "er·~~;:-~r' f',:<l'2~, 5:",';C' ,C~l c:",j 3'ces after i'1~to!lo,i~.\ '~";;;"! ~;~.~~: ____ ~; }~;I~~II t";:,j;e .: ·Jlt. FUh.Jre L,:m(lS:::''; !rnprovemen; t',y (twr1e~. (20u) ;otel e'ocue, - -:'!..llOS l:1ter:olc:-He: tn low;'" .yp ~~J. -'af ~:~~::::;~~' I -"-----.--.r--=---. t Stone mUle.l 11' ' , ! EdO",q -1 _ --..: ------------~ .. / I --.:--------I L ,',--.:: _ =, , 'i.::~:*:;;t:~7~::: -~ -c').. H loil t.'i: # C::'H",cre:e C:;J to;;Oit;re I/o'all -'~-HPP, ,-' -~-,: ... ---,. 'pl;~t'ngs or" ,own ___ ,I -_ ~ C to so," & p'ot<:'o_ : : ", ' ~~,~;;'i;i;~;;'~~~~~r:In .~~" ~. "{ -b,"~, "" ",",:'~ ___ ,. _."",. '';~~=~;~r-s.{~--~--~"-,-.~-----~' ~ '" A"i"s; c'Ooe5 :0 c,~_;_ ~ c I I , ohollO: swaie irom ;>ot,o I~ _ -:Y.. ·Y€C ;j~~ln~t;~~= ~~~ch o LAYOUT & FINISHES PlAN: FAMILY COURT ~0!-/~'-:~\) \"~_/ occeote~.) ~(~~-(T'''-' (_\) \J'" • ..-.;<.C""'!.~~,.;;:;". '<::'C. ,~~ ....:;:.o:;.~'-... [~ ...:.:t.,,~ AO!C ..... ~l;.,~ :>£1 .... , nbbj ; .... - Sil<!'lmRniro !loa=:;; ~~~ ==:-..... ~\Ion.y """"'" c:.-- 400 Soulh 43rd SI R.e:mtm ...... ~ Valley MfdicaI Ccner Expansion Projea ~ ----_ .. ---~ ------.. ~=-:-:- L5.01 /' d,--:~L ) I -.~ I ~j flll!11 I ill .Ull ~ -:. --. ~,. ',' . '1 I ) j ~ ~ ~ B~ ~ ;: ~h ;" ~'I If \r~' ,.' ¥' !' "'I ~~ i: ~ j . .' ';0, :\ Y'-j = ~: ~ ~~~ ~~ ~ ~~~ l'>~ ~! It! 'I~/I ~. " (,~~ ~ ! ~ ;~~ . J~ Ph :'~ g ~,:!;, :\:t . ~,-~ ", ~ ~.~~ l?1~ 1:11 ~~ " ~A" ~m ~; r ., ,,~ , ~a! i If : I\"! {g ~ ~!' Iii ~~ " ~J@ Illf .! ~ ~t~ u lj . T Lt ~ ~" ~ . " !'I} .~ :i~~ ~t ;,',.1 P .Q ' .. ' I~ I. IU t-~l .Q ~sw I~ i ~·i ~. ~-.-c: " &~ '" ,-, ,I-I I t I " I; II !, " ., .. .. 8~--nl i i 1! Ii . I 0 .. - .1~tl~l.J.jtNOllff'HHO'J~O~ .' 0-- ®. - ~ . ' I 0· -11' ~I -I 0 1 - I 1- • 8 .. - -I i i ' I I ~ G)-- nonoo ~ ~i !, 11 -f 1'''1 81 Lt ~ If P ~J :Q' 'h~ ~~! !l}!' I i ~i i·j ~~! I" I oCl ~ ~ .~ ~a II! c: dg, '" .. 11J -I. I Lf Ii JIll I P Iii :Q' H~ ~ ~U, IJ" ~i I~ ~31 i,l! i·n . "@ ~hf ~, ill ; I , ( I:' ~I . . ; i 1 • ~ '.) r"j . '. '.:, , J ... ~ •• ~.\ '; ... .. ' ~ ri. . J: ~J ~ .. . ; ,;.,~ '"":' .' . I, i I· i . . 1',; I II 111111 I : i I' 'l II , I. I', I I I. Iii I : ~ ,Iii I I I ,.~) I 118 I 11'1 Illl~ I d,JI 1 • Ii J I ,I. '>\i .• ,": ·li . .. ··1. , . ·~:.11 .. . ::. ;,;. ~;.). " ·,P:od:; .... --.'t .: >~. ,i,l i #"! i':',,(:::, I III : III !~ I ! 1 I 1.11 i'l I : II . I'III~~ I : II '111;1 i, ,- N N o "''' ,."", ~ . ~"" ... ~" .... " " , ...... , ,~, ............. .. .•. ",' ~I I ,- II! 1 N N II' 0 tI" I I I ~ , \ I Lj ~ -I-8111 ;ll ri J~ U I ~~I !!Il' 81 I J~ , of: g JJ~I ,J Jl ~il hI! !~J c: F~h II lJ -~ III!I Lt J~ p ] I §~l ,/-!I :Q' ih~ ~ I ~~! j'/! ~n oCI l § ~il '1\ c: dh eo , .. '-., /' !?~;. '. " .. ' . ~" . ,II . -: ,~ ' .. " ~ . 1 I I i II Ii; I! II ,I: I! ! ~ I' ' IIII .I /1,11 /111 • II~I: II 'ft, Ii III ,I l~~, ,JI.I ',' , , ".. ~ , • i -,' i· ", i"" I . '1-: 1,-1 , , I,' .. ~ . .. . ~' , " ') I ,e " ... , ", ·1 !.l i L. I I'll I I, II I I II ! '.11 ' ' I .1 . ~ r,' III II i I, ..- (Y) C\J o • i • I 'II ll~i ...... , ..... ; .. ,, .... ) I I 'I! II ..- III (Y) , ILI:l,111 N 0 1 ~ _ ~ IIII IIII I j I I J ! i J!III C\J -t \11:1 81 Id r U C") H Jj . &': III .1 I I " C\i gJld ~ ~U! I,', r ~-J 18 0 ~~! j,/i II; I , /' , ~J , , . :,111,11, I .:l r·. ia !I! , i I II I' ",i II: ~h.! '" j. 1°1 . M~ IJ -+ JRl!1 ~ 1 §5i ,,, :Q' ll~! I," ~ I ~~ j,/i .Q ] t g I ;}l ~a !fl II: " fi~ • j j ! e ~ -! ~ • I ~ ! , . G G B ~I~ ~ '" u~ [..:l~l -em II--..--.J I Ii' , ~ ~ II I 1.1 I ,I. ~ 1 11 ~ . II II I II ~' I \. ! I II II II I:~ I IIIII1 I -------~--------------------~------~~~~==~-- '1 "rj . •• 1 I I . -I I 1 .t!-1 I 'R ,-1---': .IT.'--1 -- j- jJ , g H fir: ,;§ !Jl I:: I , .. . - -I 1 I I I I!~ tl:! .,' ;1" '. ~ !f ~ 1'l .l:l~ J.t jj£ jJ i ~j .. I I I I I·· I 1I1I111I1 ! I! I, .1 I ,I I II I 'I I ~ II I ! i =::~!! I I 1 ,---- I ! _! I 1 __ J. ! I ! J.. __ l .. , , I I _J ._~ _ J I I I I : I Iii! g ~I -I c:i .' , « • 1 i~ . I d'ii I ro' , 0 __ j'I", -, ~ j ~t ~ ILll"l ' I I 1'1 i I; ~ ~ jJ I~t ~rl p: ~} I, II d! c.o l'H7 il ~ "'~ I , 1.1 0 . ~l~ -8 1111 ci .Q' ;,~ '1. 4! ih j] , .a ~~~ Jt II I II .1 ~I . ·f « L ~~ : ,J! I c: '\':0,' II II III : i dllill I J ! •••• . 1 ."" :··1 1- ,' .. ... 1 !, , j H jJ §', ~ :Q" i r~ ~ .a ' ~-c: h-~ jl "g,~ 0-r--- I ~ I ®~: 0' 8---'- 8-.- 1-' " II' I!.! i.\,1 I.': _v :i-=/ ·-.C·Jt~ ~ ~ ~ ~l~ I,~ " . .. I I r.~-~- 1--'- -1_ :=~- I IIIlIIIIIDIIII I ' GJ: J-I. I mJllIIIIIIIIIII Lt ~ p~ :sf ~h ~i § un, I ~:Jr-'-.0-..11 -';j"--:-r"' ~ !~. i. !~ Ii l-:ob-r-i--,II-ll I I' I il I ~II-'-- i ii ---j-' 'j'- i i I i, il IIllDW " ---11--ii il I 'I .,1 ~ i mm' ~ ,I k I ' ~i I ua:iIm ii ®-I-~I i ::=i----- ~ Iii '--+ntmlllJ 0-·-m~. ~I' il I i, I I il • I ' I 8--I--.L.·-I'I' . I -1-- I i ii ~! i Ii I~i r.\ __ L'-1III\tm Ii v~ : :Hi--- • I ' " I,~!I u-'~' I 8 1--'~'-!-----,1IlIWIII -""1--'- I 1m. I ~ I II 1 1_:1 I 8+-.I-~j.-I, • ii .. -: ~,' ii • I " , II i I ii ' (0 -i-----". ____ I , 1 l1 - . :"..- ! : Ii ~I i'5 "I I' ~, ~ • I 1/ ~ ffil ,i' rh: ~ 1= -ID~ 0:_.1_ 'I' , ~ "," V -.--. I 'fi : til': i' 'I" I' --~ ~ , I I 0.; .. I ii i (.~I (~ ;. tJ . ~ " DJmIUI,I ___ 1-I 1II=~I--1 I i I i 8 ,~:-mimi:' ! CII!IIIIIJD!!lI mlllllllDli l i i i $ ~I 1--.:;---'-' I , -~--.-- I co I ..-a ~ " L· ~ ,j;~ ~ ]j III 11(1 pI Ii i b , '~limil Ii! I -,',I ~,n :2 j 'n~ Jl ~·i , ~--~r.iJ c: d1[,? i I':;' , I ~: , ' ~ , I ~ I , ' 'on I I. I I; : ,!t; I :'! I .!, ,.-' ._T . [---I" i II It': I-'-r . I I I ,.~'IIJ_" L ' " - ,.J , .. ,Loir- • U ." ... ~r ~ -- :11,'-- 1, ~ I ~:t/;---~k-"~U"'-;-""-'-' :<-/11' a-' ;::t~C'-::;-if -.- t, .. ' ". ._;:-----...... --"-:-~ .;:-- ... ," - -·'~--=_I-·-----=....... -~_":".i ,. ~.~;:~-. 2n~.fT.X)4 ~~ ~~-.e..Qor;.et::l.lrl'!>.·~_.1 Jow.o.a":,,,"~ ,c.·~~~\";t .J ~. .-~ ... ~ .~:...-"-.-- :-(:$ ~.~ . ........ "'~ ! :·i· C~~~;:~+:~'~1t:~:017~~ . '. /~~>~.':f /- ',I *~:~( , I " ..... ( .~.:~{ .l«lf;:O:; • • • :: ... .:. _ ·~~::m..ftiJ.:l!I ... !'Ill O'OIL . .m::s./uac ~ ~Jit- 7 ltt""d.Q""'u-.DII!ISJaI_~=-. ~~ .. :.,~ . .:-.' •.. ;: I. ~ I nbbj 111Sc:ut> ..... s.. ---=m<6S6 "'="""" SiI< Plan Re"iew Docmnents ~-!-.. ~= .\M-yMo:li::al~ 400 Soudl-4Jni St Re:raon.\\'~ VaIle)' Mtdir2I Ccmrr Exjension Projea ---, =~aoor;n.W;-- ~~~~~ . ~" C2.01 nbbj ~~'~~,!::Iw: s.:..~.iB1i;t ="""" ... =~ SiI<PIanRnn' Docmnents ~~-I- ~..:..!::'=.':;''';'r"''::: e-"""""'" .\M-yMo:li::al~ .&00 SoaIh 43rd 51 R.ea=l..\\'~ VaIle) MedicaJ Ctn!er Expansl1n Projea --- ~""'i#Cl_ ~A~c::-.~.~_ ----- C2.01 , SiLl ~ U -+ 11'11 11 J~ ~s : p: gih~ ~~' 1,1. II . r ~~I i,/i . -' I t ~J ~.j l Ii iJ1 ~a !Il c: dt, , ! J : ::t lilll Ji ~ II~~ ] I~!' llri ..... ~ I I" '.Q I fi , J1 ~ 't! c: ".h~ I i ti 'j i I .1 I i ~ J . , h .' I f f i R ~jl ~ ~ 9. _ o ~ -t i ~~ f ~J .. " o ~ ru-. J: ~-j ,(, , I ...... ! • L~ I II . I ,~ ,I 1; .1 il I· .' 1'1 .;, ll·!~ I I: . II1I i If ll~ll 1111 C\J , 111.1 II! "! C\J 1·11 1,1 II. .. i U I d"l 11'111 .Ii'i I, ~ .. I I C\J 11:1 C\J di~11 I N u ~ -t jj ii I, '1Ii,1! .~ ':;:'" I; I.f! ih :2 1$1 CI . ~~ 'i :I ,III t- " " l-I ~,:" "" , ' .. ~'", "" ,.<" ~ .', :'r//,"j . , ". • , • I' ,"" ;, /' • ' .i, J .... '.' >' i " --- ~ :sl II~I' i'] \~ill'il :;- ~ .' " IIIIIII!I 1 111 ' l'I.lli I "II 1 1 ,.1, i I III U,~ /,!'I 1111111,1 I~J ""I';I~I J 111111 " , :1 I ,If,l I I. 'I' t::J !. (\0 il -I 0 0 ~ --I , I 1 January 13, 2006 Denny Kendall General Foreman/Estimator Johnson BackhoelDozing Services, Inc. 630821 i h Ave NE Redmond, W A 98053-6320 CIT~RENTON PlanriingIBuildinglPublic Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator Subject: Approval of Minor Modification to Approved Valley Medical Site Plan Temporary Office Trailers 400 S 43rd St, Renton, WA 98055 City of Renton File No. LUA04-021 Dear Mr. Kendall: This letter is sent to infonn you that we have reviewed your proposed revisions to the Valley Medical Center site plan. A previous site plan was approved by the City on May 21, 2004. You propose to have your carpenter shop tie into the sanitary sewer, while also installing two temporary office trailers including their associated sewer stubs. For the Site Plan Modification to be considered a minor modification the amendment must not: 1. Involve more than a ten percent (10%) increase in area or scale of the development in the approved site development plan; or 2. Have a significantly greater impact on the environment and facilities than the approved plan; or 3. Change the boundaries of the originally approved plan (RMC 4-9-200.H). The proposed changes, as depicted on the site plan received by the City on January 9, 2006, are hereby approved as a minor modification to the previously approved site plan subject to the following conditions: 1. The two temporary trailers shall be removed rio-iater than February 26, 2007. This decision to approve the proposed revisions as a minor modification is subject to a fourteen (14) day appeal period from the date of this letter. Any appeals of the administrative decision must be filed with the City of Renton Hearing Examiner by 5:00 p.m., January 27, 2006. Any construction undertaken before the expiration of the appeal period will be at the applicant's risk. If you have questions regarding this correspondence, feel free to contact Laureen Nicolay at (425) 430-7294. Jennifer Henning Principal Planner Development Services Division cc: File No. LUA04-040 Puhlic HospilJll Dis!. # I ------------~REN'T' O'N',' , 1055 South Grady Way -Renton, Washington 98055 ~ This paper contains 50% recycled material, 30% post consumer AHEA() OF THE CURVE llc.': JOHNSBDD24NK JOHNSON BACKHOE/DOZING SERVICES, INC, Offtco: 425.868.1413· Fax: 425.836.4135 o Ave. NE • Redmond, WA 98053-6320 Greg Johnson Owner/Operator Cell: 206.910.6320 L -__ ~----=et3 7' rr'r:: , ...; .. _ ..... co ru J e 0)e e -Je 0\0) <C t z " ~ ~ 8" -Vx CB 1/62 RIM = 49.11' I.E. = 46.31' fC(7/L /.'50 I.E. 61.53' SSMH #22 RIM = 64.64' .~ CB #hf = 54.3 RIM = 60.20' • I.E. = 51.75' Valley 400 S. Medical Center 43rd Renton) \VA st 98055 ("' " ::::::'\T<=-/"": [a-.Y\ /v1oct. €:':·cc.+~CI" Itpfduvr£ Jc.~UC,f} ,~ ( :lu06 , LL<A--O¥ -t) 1 0 ( "Valley Medical Center ~ Where you are the center Engineering Office 425/228-3440 ext. 5826 January 9, 2006 Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Laureen Nicolay, We will be tying in the sanitary sewer to our carpenter shop. Project Name: Sanitary Sewer connection. (See site map for location) At the same time we want to install two sewer stubs for two future temporary office trailers. Sincerely, Garry Maitrejean Facility Manager Valley Medical Center 400 S. 43rd St Renton, WA 98055 T: 425-228-3440 Ext 5826 3 /'-Ai) f..(T+-t s (0./ l Z-HO tstt1 s S-r-Ae;(1i'JlO IfJ ~; Valley Medical Center· 400 South 43rd Street· P.O. Box 50010· Renton, WA 98058-5010 main (425) 228-3450 • fax (425) 656-4202 • www.valleymed.org ,. ,~. ,. -<I Board of Public Works At. Ja ./une 22, 2005 Page 2 • OFF-SITE DEFERRAL, BARTELL SHORT PLAT, LUA 04-007, 1725 NE 24TII STRI~I~T The applicant is subm itting a request to defer the installation of plantings ncar the detention pond and to defer the installation of a spillway located at the outfall of the pond, so the applicant can record the short plat. The deferral request is for a period of approximately 90 -120 days (summer/fall of 2005). The extended time line would allow the pond to dry up, so the spillway can be constructed and would allow the plants to be installed in dryer weather. Recommendation: The staff recommends the Board grant the request for deferral subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant provides a security device acceptable to the Board to cover the deferred items. Device shall be in place prior to recording of the short plat. The security device shall cover 150% of the costs of the deferred improvements. Estimated cost of deferred items is $9,000.00. 2. In accordance with the HPA permit time line, deferred items shall be constructed and installed by September 30,2005. • ON/OFF-SITE DEFERRAL, STONEIUDGE aka: WINDSTONE PLAT, L U A 04-040, 148 Til AVE SE & NE 17 Til STREET The applicant is requesting a deferral for installation of street trees, final lift of asphalt within the plat, on-site park improvements, street plans, and street improvements on 1481h Ave SE (Nile Ave NE), including curb, gutter, drainage, sidewalk, and street lighting. Applicant is requesting to defer installation of street trees and final lift of asphalt within the plat for a period of two years, on-site park improvements for a period of four months (summer of2005), and street improvement on 1481h (Nile) within 60 days of approval by King County. Recommendation: The staff recommends the Board grant the requests for deferral subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant provides a security device acceptable to the Board to cover the deferred items. Device shall be in place prior to recording of the short plat. The security device shall cover 150% of the costs ofthe deferred improvements. 2. Defer installation of street improvements on 1481h Ave SE (Nile Ave NE), including curb, gutter, storm drainage, sidewalk, final lift of asphalt, and street lighting. Recommend deferral with no occupancy· to any buildings until improvements are installed and approved by the City. Street plans are now approved by King County. Estimated cost of improvements is $126,826.00. Work to be completed by September 30,2005. ' .. CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 8th day of June, 2004, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Final Letter documents. This information was sent to: James Hobbs Contact Valley Medical Center Owner .. ~ ......... "\'''\\, (Signature of Sender): ...... ",N KAA1. "'" '~~~~~e...-~~~~~--------~t;.,~~ ....... Q~', / .' SIO '. , •• : ... \13 N !i. ... ~ " STATE OF WASHINGTON SS COUNTY OF KING ,,~-.;o' '+-0'. "<' I, ':0 .. 'OT AL'> ~ ... -1\ ~ :u ,... 'Ty 111~ ~ ~ : ... ~~: ! ~., fP \ ~UBL\C ! ~ ,I A', :~ 4 I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy M. Tucker ""',7i···~:?,~:,9~.···~'-'~_f signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act fu.r.~fi'~~ purposes mentioned in the instrument. '\\\"", ........ Notary (Print): _____ -M~~IAM4JHEfr__----------D4.oJ~Ib¥N KAMSIIEFF My appointment expires: ft~y ADOn,~rTMENT EXPIRES 6-29-07 Valley Medical Center Expansion LUA04-040, SA-A, ECF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON·SIGNIFICANCE·MITIGATED (DNS·M) POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJeCT NAMe: PROJeCT NUMBeR: LOCATION: DBSCRIPTION: VALLEY MBDICAL CENTER eXPANSION ~~~6~i~ ~~'~~BT (NORTHWeST CORNBR OF TALBOT RD. S 43" ST) THE APPLICANT IS REQUeSTING ENVIRONMeNTAL (SEPA) ReVIEW AND AOMINISTRATIVe sITe PLAN APPROVAL FOR THE eXPANSION OF THO VALLEY MEDICAL ceNTeR INCLUOING THe ENCLOSURE OF AN eXISTING COURTY ARD. TeNANT IMPRoveMeNTS TO THRee FLOORS. A NEW PATIENT DROP·OFF AREA ANO THE CONVERSION OFTHE HELIPORT INTO A 83 STALL SURFACE PARKING LOT. THE MULTI·PARCEL SITE IS ZONED COMMERCIAL OFFICE WITH A P SUFFIX (CO·P). THE PROPOSED WORK INCLUDES PORTIONS OF THREE PARCELS. ACCESS WOULD REMAlN AS EXISTING. FROM S. 43RD ST. AND TALBOT RD. S. TO INTERNAL DRIVES. THE PROJECT ALSO INCLUDES THE INSTALLATION OF LANDSCAPING. A PEDESTRIAN BRIDOE AND OTHER NECESSARY IMPROVEMENTS. T~IE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. APPEALS OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION MUST BE FILED IN WRITING ON OR BEFORE 5:00 PM JUNE 7. 2004. APPEALS MUST BE FILED IN WRITING TOGETHER WITH THE REQUIRED $75.00 APPLICATION FEE WITH: HEARING EXAMINER. CITY OF RENTON. lOSS SOUTH GRADY WAY. RENTON. WA 96055. APPEALS TO THE EXAMINER ARE GOVERNED BY CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 4-8.' 10.B. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE APPEAL PROCESS MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE RENTON CITY CLERK'S OFFICE. (425) 43Q.B510. / iA' . ! 1// / Iii/I ' ~-)II/J1"( -~,i~ ".,,-I -illtl -(~~~) I ~~ il._,~~ .. -r~ FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT (425) 430·7200, DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION PleaBO Include the project NUMBER.when calling for pro er file Identification. CERTIFICATION It _~...o..;..;;~>-(":....;.,;:ic:..::;.-~-,-_e_ud-::;;...' _1A. ...... ;Y) ___ t hereby certify that 3. copies of the above document were posted by me in :3 conspicuous places on or the descri bed property on __ ...;:5=r.:tz.:'-I' '-P0:--L _________ -+-_---:::;;.(, ~ '"'\\''' ~ • ~ ...... ~\'lKA~'IIIII / V' I Signed: .~~ .. s,'6N.~.~~~'", A TTEST: Subscribed and~sworn before I • a Notary Public. In /,,~. -.r.()" ~ " 'I'ii':P. .., I .IrA .~' OrAb .0;,'" -'(\ ~ Washington residing.n rr-. on the ~ YVr day 0 'T~",~ ~ ....... f/); ~ MARILYN KAMCHEFF MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES 6·29·07 ~ (/I ~. .oUBL\C .: : '" ;.A '. .. ~ : " "Y~"" 8'29 01 , .. ,~O: I,~'" .'1' ... _ I " ... 0 .......... ~V'.,- II"'I'F: WAS,",' .............. "'" \\\ ....... ~ ... CITY OF RENTON PLANNING I BUILDING I PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM Date: June 18, 2004 To: 'City Clerk's Office From: Stacy M. Tucker Subject: Land Use File Closeout Please complete the following Information to facilitate project closeout and Indexing by the City Clerk's Office. Project Name: Valley Medical Center Expansion LUA (file) Number: LUA-04-040, SA-A, ECF Cross-Refe re nces: AKA's: Project Manager: Susan Fiala Acceptance Date: April 20, 2004 Applicant: Valley Medical Center Owner: Same Contact: James R. Hobbs PID Number: 8857670100, 8857670010, 8857670030 ERC Decision Date: May 18, 2004 ERC Appeal Date: June 7, 2004 Administrative Approval: May 21,2004 Appeal Period Ends: June 7, 2004 Public Hearing Date: , Date Appealed to HEX: By Whom; HEX Decision: Date: Date Appealed to Council: By Whom: Council Decision: Date: Mylar Recording Number: Project Description: 23,600 sq ft expansion of existing hospital-value $35,000,000. The applicant Is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Administrative Site Plan approval for the expansion of the Valley Medical Center including the enclosure of an existing courtyard, tenant Improvements to three floors, a new patient drop-off area and the conversion of the heliport into a 63 stall surface parking lot. The multi-parcel site Is zoned Commercial Office with a P suffix (CO-P). The proposed work Includes portions three parcels which total 24 acres. Access would be remain as existing, from S. 43rd st. and Talbot Rd. S. to Internal roads. The project also includes the Installation of landscaping a pedestrian walkway and other necessary Improvements. Location: 400 S 43rd Street Comments: , , ~ Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor June 7, 2004 James Hobbs NBBJ 111 S Jackson Street Seattle, WA 98104 SUBJECT: Valley Medical Center Expansion LUA-04-040, SA-A, ECF Dear Mr. Hobbs: CITY F RENTON PlanningIBuildinglPublic Works Department . Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator This letter is to inform you that the appeal period has ended for the Environmental Review Committee's (ERC) Determination of Non-Significance -Mitigated and Administrative Site Plan Review for the above-referenced project. No appeals were filed on the ERC determination and Administrative Site Plan Review. This decision is final and application for the appropriately required permits may proceed. The applicant must comply with all ERC Mitigation Measures and Site Plan Conditions of Approval. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (425) 430-7382. For the Environmental Review Committee, Susan Fiala Senior Planner cc: Valley Medical Center / Owner ~F1N~AL~'DO~C-------------------------~RENTO·N 1055 South Grady Way -Renton, Washington 98055 * TIlls paper contains 50% recycled matarlal, 30% post consumer AH flAP OF THfl CURVE STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING } AFFIDA VIT OF PUBLICATION PUBLIC NOTICE Lily Nguyen, being fiTSt duly sworn on oath that she is a Legal Advertising Representati ve of the King County Journal a daily newspaper, which newspaper is a legal newspaper of general circulation and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continuously as a daily newspaper in King County, Washington. The King County Journal has been approved as a Legal Newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. The notice in the exact form annexed was published in regular issues of the King County Journal (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a Notice of Environmental Determination was published on Monday, 5124/04 The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $106.75 at tbe Iifte of$15.50 per inch for the first publication and NIA per sequent~. Lily Nguyen Legal Adverti'Sing Representative, King County Journal Z~;'24thdaYOfMaY.2004. Torn A. Meagher Notary Public for the State of Washington, Residing in Redmond, Washington Ad Number: 841586 P.O. Number: Cost of publishing this notice includes an affidavit surcharge. NO'i'ICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL . . DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ! COMMrnrEE ' RENTON, WASmNGTON The Environmental Review I'Committee . has issued a !Determination of Non-Significan~ iMitigated for the following project bder' the authority of the Ren~ Municipal Code.' . ) I VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER, ; EXP~SION . , LUA04-04O:ECFSA-A J ' : Location: 40 '-&uth ~rd Street \ (Northwest·rorner of Talbot Rd. & ,S ~ St.). The applicant is '.\\'.11 \\ ii i 1/11111/, ,,,' ':1 E'" 'I/. ". p.-. i\ "G /'l. ,': ,>' ............... ,y~ ~ :.:.: .. 0 ·.~ .. ·:"./i:.'cn c-t;· .. 1> ~ :~ ..... ,~ tS~ " .. -. ~ ..; / uO hI 0 I A R y "", "~ ~ . \" .-! -0-: = -. ,..~-::: !.fl,'. PUBl\'U .: 0 ~ ~~..... :'\ •••• A.:.~ ,. -v ..... ·.>I?",v 20'> •• 0 :-.; "/ ",'..' 2, .' _'\.' " 'l"" ......... d,\'-" 'l//. OF WA.S'" \,:\" /1/ \\\ 11/11/11111\\\\\ :requesting Environmental (SEPA) ;RevieW and AdministratiVe Site : 'l;'lan approval for tl;te eiB~~_i 1iJfthe Vall€y Mem.cal~ 'U~Wr, . ,. cl ding' .. th' ' cl ·H\ ,ff~Wi .. '."'~.·1 1m u e en OBUre.:,01''''!lll !existing courtyard,tenant ; improvements to three floors, a new patient drop-off area·,and~the I conversion of the heliport into a 63 stall surface parking lot: The multi-parcel site is zoned Commercial Office with a P su."Ux (CO-P). The proposed;w:.o$ includes portions of threE:P~, '; Access would remain as existing, :. fro~ S. 43rd ~t. and Talb~t:1Ul:~: ( to mtemaI drives. The'proJ~t'laISo includes the installation 'of : landscaping, a pedestrian' bridge .; and other necessary improvements. ' Appeals of the environmental determination must .be filed !in writing on or·h!illlre 5:,00,£1)1 june'7j 2004. Appe~. must bElfilei( ,in writing tagether withthlNT~ $75.00 application fee~thl$fjearnii Examiner, City of .Renton\,>l,-,J;055~ South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98Q55. Appeals. to the Examfuer. ~e, governed by City ,of ·~Renton i Municipal Code Section ·,'4'S-..FrOiB. Additional information regardilig'.the: appeal process may be obtained,:fi:m'n the Renton City Clerk's OffiCe, (4?5~ 430-6510. " ." Published 'in the KIn":COIfuty' Journal May 24, 2004. #841586:' ! •.• _ • _ • ______ • _____ • .to. ...:..___ _ ) CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 21 6t day of May, 2004, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Environmental Determination & Administrative Site Plan Approval documents. This information was sent to: James Hobbs Applicant Valley Medical Center Owner ..................... N"~~"" ~) ~ .:' .......... ~\..~ ... :.':'141.I,'" (Signature of Senderh. ~ /Z\.t-\SSIO.v~.~~,\ : ... o~· ~,,\~ ~ STATE OF WASHINGTO ) : :(5 ~OTA-9 ~ ... "'f\ ~ ~: J.. m~ ~ ) Ss '-: -'-(I): ~ ~ (I)' I:llJ • ~ COUNTY OF KING ) ~ "'" \ Bue .... ; ',,,,~. ~ . ~.- '" ~ ···~·29.07 ..... 0 .f I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Patrick Roduln \,O!:, 'WAS~\~C;~---- signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for tha'us,~~~~ purposes mentioned in the instrument. . Dated: {"/?-8'b y ~~iC i~s1,rle1washington Notary (Print): ___ ---WiMJIAIARmlr.;~~Hi KAIAI~wdle~HEi'ifiI"I!------------- My appointment expires: MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES 6-29.n7 Valley Medical Center Expansion LUA04-040, ECF, SA-A CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION' AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 21 st day of May, 2004, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing ERC Determination documents. This information was sent to: "'·F:~l}~.' "f'~:yl<,." " ", ,"" '. ",.,,' 1" i.'" ...... ,"j,:l::.'i',f ::", .,.".:' :':'::t,::::i, ,,:Name'!!i.':;: ,:;. ,:" •• ,',:' :";"i. :' ';<"';':"\~::<'!: ,.' ,'; 'I,' ::,." • ';" "', " >" .. ,'iI.· ". ::':!i':<J:::::' ," "',':' , " .:!:,~ :; ::::;R!~p'rQil'~ntin'g:i .. ,: ,:' ;i ." :,<;:', )f,':::;I;, ,: Agencies See Attached r I" ~2) X ""', .... ,\\\\" (Signature of Sender): ....... 'iN KA4f. "III _.:~v. ........... C~ t " c.--/ ~ : ~ •• ~,SSION ~"" ~ I, : .. ~ :.r"o •• ~ ~ STATE OF WASHINGTON ) , :0 .. 'OTAb ~'. "1\ ~ : :0 \'0 'Ty "'~ ~ ) SS :; : _._ en: ~ ~ • • tI COUNTY OF KING ) ~ f/l \ }:lUSLIC • : I. ;..\ '. .. :o!J. :: ", ., • • 0:00;;-... " ~ ····6'·29.01 .... ~ ,; I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Patrick Roduln \~ O~·"·"····~~~ .. --- signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for'\n&\~~" purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: 5/~JiJI Notary (Print): __ --nM'"ARiR'L:r,mVNm;;KA;;:M;;:;C~HE;LJFF~------------ My appointment expires: MY APpoiNTMENT EXPIRES 6·29·07 Valley Medical Center Expansion LUA04-040, ECF, SA-A template· affidavit of service by mailing Dept. of Ecology" Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 WSDOT Northwest Region" Attn: Ramin Pazookl King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240 PO Box 330310 Seattle WA 98133-9710 US Army Corp. of Engineers" Seattle District Office Attn: SEPA Reviewer PO Box C-3755 Seattle WA 98124 Jamey Taylor" Depart. of Natural Resources PO Box47015 Olympia WA 98504-7015 KC Dev. & Environmental Servo Attn: SEPA Section 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 Metro Transit Senior Environmental Planner Gary Kriedt AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING (ERe DETERMINATIONS) WDFW -Stewart Reinbold" Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. c/o Department of Ecology " 3190 160lh Ave SE Attn. SEPA Reviewer Bellevue, WA 98008 39015 -172nd Avenue SE Auburn WA 98092 Duwamlsh Tribal Office" Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program 14235 Ambaum Blvd. SW -Front A " Burien, WA 98166 Attn: Ms Melissa Calvert 39015 172nd Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092-9763 KC Wastewater Treatment Division" Office of Archaeology & Historic Environmental Planning Supervisor Preservation" Ms. Shirley Marroquin Attn: Stephanie Kramer 201 S. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050 PO Box 48343 Seattle WA 98104-3855 Olympia WA 98504-8343 City of Newcastle City of Kent Attn: Mr. Mlcheal E. Nicholson Attn: Mr. Fred Satterstrom, AICP Director of Community Development Acting Community Dev. Director 13020 SE 72nd Place 220 Fourth Avenue South Newcastle, WA 98059 Kent, WA 98032-5895 Puget Sound Energy City of Tukwila Municipal Liason Manager Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official Joe Jainga 6300 Southcenter Blvd. 201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431 PO Box 90868, MS: XRD-01W Tukwila, WA 98188 Seattle WA 98104-3856 Bellevue WA 98009-0868 Seattle Public Utilities Real Estate Services Eric Swennson 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 Seattle WA 98104·5004 Note: If the Notice of Application states that It Is an "Optional DNS·, the marked agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy of the checklist, PMT's, and the notice of application. " Also note, do not mall Jamey Taylor any of the notices she gets hers from the web. Only send her the ERe Determination paperwork. template -affidavit of service by mailing ~~I!. ,,~ ..&J, -Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor May 21,2004 James Hobbs NBBJ 111 South Jackson Street Seattle, WA 98104 SUBJECT: Dear Mr. Hobbs: Valley Medical Center Expansion Project No. LUA-04-040, ECF, SA-A CITY. RENTON PlanningIBuildinglPublicWorks Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) and the Development Services Director and is to advise you that they have completed their review of the subject project. The ERC, on May 18, 2004, issued a threshold Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with Mitigation Measures. See the enclosed Mitigation Measures document. The Development Services Director, on May 21 , 2004, approved the Site Plan. Please refer to the staff report and decision enclosed. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM June 7, 2004. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4~8-11 O.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. The preceding Information will assist-you in planning for implementation of your project and enable you to exercise your appeal rights more fully, if you choose to do so. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at (425) 430-7382. _ :Z:.~ltt .. , Susan Fiala Senior Planner cc: Valley Medical Center / Owner Enclosure ----------------IO-S-S-so-l-lth-a-r-a-dy-W--ay-.-R-e-nt-o-n,-W-a-s-hi-n-gt-on--9-80-S-S------------~ ® This paper conlains 50% recycled malerial, 30% posl consumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE IRRI=N~I:; DATE ~/~O" REPORT City of Renton NAME IN~ ~~ Department of Planning / Building / Public Wo I.s:s ~. f'lAC.o. "! Iq & S.~~I;; t:: ~ 2t _~ DECISION ~·~tII~ ~1J {)11-f . 11M ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTIO • REPORT DA TE: May 21,2004 Project Name: Valley Medical Center Expansion Owner/Applicant: Valley Medical Center 400 South 43rd Street, Renton, WA 98055 Contact: James Hobbs of NBBJ, 111 South Jackson St., Seattle, WA 98104 File Number: LUA-04-040, ECF, SA-A Project Manager: Susan A. Fiala, AICP Project Description: The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan approval for the expansion of the Valley Medical Center including the enclosure of an existing courtyard, tenant improvements to three floors, a new patient drop-off area and the conversion of the heliport into a 63 stall surface parking lot. The multi-parcel site is zoned Commercial Office with a P suffix (CO-P). The proposed work includes portions of three parcels. Access would be remain as existing, from S. 43rd St. and Talbot Rd. S. to internal drives. The project also includes the installation of landscaping, a pedestrian bridge and other necessary improvements. Continued on next paJLe Project Location: 400 South 43 rd Street (Northwest corner of Talbot Rd. and S. 43rd St. Exist. Bldg. Area: 348,150 sq. ft. Proposed New Bldg. Area: 23,600 sq. ft. Site Area: 1,055,589 sq. ft. (24.23 acres-gross) Project Location Map SA-A_ VMC.doc REPORT & DECISION REPORT DA TE: Project Name: Owner/Applicant: Contact: File Number: Project Description: Project Location: Exist. Bldg. Area: Site Area: City of Renton Department of Planning / Building / Public Works ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION May 21,2004 Valley Medical Center Expansion Valley Medical Center 400 South 43'd Street, Renton, WA 98055 James Hobbs of NBBJ, 111 South Jackson St., Seattle, WA 98104 LUA-04-040, ECF, SA-A Project Manager: Susan A. Fiala, AICP The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan approval for the expansion of the Valley Medical Center including the enclosure of an existing courtyard, tenant improvements to three floors, a new patient drop-off area and the conversion of the heliport into a 63 stall surface parking lot. The multi-parcel site is zoned Commercial Office with a P suffix (CO-P). The proposed work includes portions of three parcels. Access would be remain as existing, from S. 43rd St. and Talbot Rd. S. to internal drives. The project also includes the installation of landscaping, a pedestrian bridge and other necessary improvements. Continued on next page 400 South 43'd Street (Northwest corner of Talbot Rd. and S. 43'd St. 348,150 sq. ft. Proposed New Bldg. Area: 1,055.589 sq. ft. (24.23 acres-gross) II i / I ,J I, ' ----w' " ~JBl)1Sr . 23,600 sq. ft. II i ,Ii ; I ; ! / / / / / ,'" I~': (CO) .' r (o-a)-" '::.:, .'~) h -~Jl; e:r,-- ~""" ... I i I· ! I:' /1:' -'\\ I II i , .\\\ I : i! i ' \~\ ji (CO) ,/ I;' /',1,'(' /' \Yio\ ~;l·;i i/! -----+/~fr'-~-'~~~~~--.. ?\-. '~~~-I .. r~i , ,Wl~ (CO) \ (OW-I) I /1 I : I~: / r / .' I / I (CO) I 'r' / ) / " / ,I ..-! I {J : ; //; /' I I l I:' .-;' /1/ / /" /;// /'i I r I,' r .I (CO) (0-') ~ (CO) (0-') r I / / / / / ( ,)_ ;;- ----I I/r/'- Project Location Map /' I ! / ! it I' ;~~J l (CO) I II (R-H) Yicp-n1 CR>UfI SA-A_ VMC.doc City of Renton PIBIPW Department VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER EXPANSION Administrative Site Plan & En vironm", , ,.al Review Committee Staff Report LUA-04-040, ECF, SA-A REPORT AND DECISION OF May 21,2004 Page 2 of 7 II PART ONE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND The project consists of 105,000 sq. ft. of remodeling and 20,000 sq. ft. of new exterior building enclosure. A new auto court would be provided and pedestrian bridge from the new surface parking lot to the new entrance and drop off area. The existing heliport is proposed to be removed and replaced with a 64 stall surface parking lot. The applicant is proposing to enclose an existing courtyard and fountain feature to accommodate a new entry lobby, a drop off for hospital and surgery patients, and provide additional space for the surgery department, admitting, gift shop and support space. Interior remodeling is proposed to the third floor for the surgery department to have ten new surgeries, 26 pre-op post-op rooms and an expansion to the west would provide a corridor and stairs for the new surgeries. The existing surgery department on the second floor would be gutted and remodeled for eight new surgery spaces. The existing family birthing center on the second floor would be gutted and remodeled to contain a new family center with 36 labor delivery, recovery postpartum rooms and support space. The existing children's therapy department adjacent to the family center will be relocated to an off-campus site. The vacated space would be remodeled to contain a new Level III Neonatal Intensive Care Unit for 23 babies. There would be a small building expansion to the north to contain a new corridor and patio for the family center. The Valley Medical Center campus is located to the northwest of the intersection of South 43rd St. and Talbot Road South. The site fronts both streets. The subject expansion would occur on the south campus area on portions of three parcels totaling 24.3 acres -gross. The applicant indicates that the project must be constructed in multiple phases in order to maintain continuous 24- hour hospital operations. The work is proposed to begin in the Summer of 2004 and end in Fall of 2006. Landscaping would be installed along the interior and perimeter of the parking lot as well as within the auto court. II PART TWO: ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION· REPORT & DECISION This decision on the administrative land use action is made concurrently with the environmental determination. A. Type of Land Use Action XX Site Plan Review Shoreline Substantial Develo ment Permit Conditional Use Bindin Site Plan Special Permit for Grade & Fill Administrative Code Determination e, Exhibits The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit NO.1: Yellow file containing: application, proof of posting and publication and other documentation Exhibit No.2: Exhibit NO.3: Exhibit NO.4: Exhibit NO.5: Exhibit NO.6: Exhibit NO.7: Exhibit No.8: Exhibit NO.9: pertinent to this request. Sheet AO.OO -Neighborhood Detail Map (dated April 2, 2004) Sheet L 1.00 -Site Plan (dated April 2, 2004) Sheet A3.01-A -Exterior Elevations: Entry Lobby(dated April 2, 2004) Sheet A3.01-S -Exterior Elevations: South & West Elevations (dated April 2. 2004) Sheet AO.06 -Second Floor Plan (dated April 2, 2004) Sheet AO.OS -Third Floor Plan (dated April 2, 2004) Sheet LS.OO - Planting PlanlTree Cutting and Preservation Plan (dated April 2, 2004) Zoning Map, Sheet 13 East (dated March 11,2003) C. Consistency with Site Plan Criteria In reviewing the proposal with respect to the Site Plan Approval Criteria set forth in Section 4-9-200.E of the Site Plan Ordinance, the following issues have been identified by City Departmental Reviewers and Divisional Reviewers: City of Renton PIBIPW Deparlment VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER EXPANSION Administrative Site Plan & Environn/ .... "al Review Committee Staff Reporl LUA·04·040, ECF, SA·A REPORT AND DECISION OF May 21. 2004 Page 3 of 7 1. Conformance with the comprehensive plan, Its elements and policies; The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designation for the project property is Center Institution (CI). The intent of the CI designation is to serve the post secondary educational and health care needs of the area and protect adjacent uses from impacts of these more intensive uses. The following Comprehensive Plan policies are applicable to the proposal: Policy LU·140. Regional health and/or medical facilities larger than five acres should be located in institution medical centers. The proposal is within the existing Valley Medical Center campus. Policy LU·141. Medical and/or educational institutions within the designated Center boundary area should be master·planned to be consistent with local and regional comprehensive plans, Valley Medical Center prepared a master plan for their north and south campuses in November 1991. The expansion and remodeling help support continuing growth of the medical center and its ancillary services. 2. Conformance with existing land use regulations; The subject site is zoned Commercial Office -Public Use (CO·P). The CO·P zone was established to provide for areas appropriate for professional, administrative and business offices and/or related uses, Office uses of various intensities are allowed in these areas to create an Employment Center. In addition, a mix of secondary uses which provide retail and service support to the employees of these areas are allowed subject to special conditions. Limited light industrial activities, which can effectively blend in with an office environment, are included as secondary uses as are medical institutions, convalescent centers, nursing homes and retirement residences. In keeping with adopted land use policies, the zone allows a mix of uses subject to special development standards, which are intended to ensure a qualitative working environment. When a project is located within the P·suffix designation, the proposal is subject to additional notification requirements; however, there is no change of use, thus no additional notification is required. The proposal's satisfaction of the applicable development standards of the CO-P zone are discussed below: Lot Coverage -The CO zone maximum lot building coverage is 65%. The building footprint of 161,482 sq. ft. on the 386,806 sq. ft. lot results in a 42% lot coverage. The project is in compliance with the requirement. Setbacks -The CO zone requires a minimum front yard /street setback of 20 feet for buildings 25 ft. to 80 ft. in height and 30 ft. for buildings over 80 ft. tall. The expansion would occur in an existing building with no additional floors added, Thus, the setback requirement is not applicable. There are no minimum required side or rear setbacks applicable to this project as the surrounding properties are zoned similarly and the project is not adjacent to a residential zone. The parking lot would be setback a minimum of 10 feet from the South 43rd SI. frontage maintaining the existing landscaping. Landscaping -The perimeter of the parking lot would be landscaped with a five foot minimum width strip increasing in width in several locations. In addition, parking lots that are greater than 10,000 sq. ft. require a minimum of five percent interior landscaping. The parking area of 22,610 sq. ft. requires 1,130 sq. ft. of landscaping and 2,208 sq. ft. would be provided. The project complies with the landscaping requirement for parking lots. Landscaping is proposed at the new auto court. The landscaping proposed would include a variety of deciduous and evergreen trees, shrubs and vines and groundcovers. Flowering Crabapple, Glory Red Maple, bamboo varieties, Boston Ivy, Japanese Holly and Dutch Crocus are a few of the proposed plant materials. All landscaped areas must be fully irrigated and be a minimum of five feet in width. At the time of building permit submittal a detailed landscape plan with species identified must be submitted along with an irrigation plan. Building Height -The CO zone allows a maximum building height of 250 feet. There are no vertical expansions to the existing building, the number of floors would remain the same. A portion of the second floor roof would be expanded and enclosed to accommodate new stairs but would remain within SA-A_ VMC.doc City of Renton PIBIPW Department VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER EXPANSION Administrative Site Plan & Environm" .. ,al Review Committee Siaff Report LUA·04·040, ECF, SA·A REPORT AND DECISION OF May 21. 2004 Page 4 of 7 the existing number of stories. The enclosed new entry lobby is proposed to be 32 ft. 6 inches at the top of new skylights which is well below the allowed building height and is in compliance with this development standard. Parking -The parking regulations require a specific number of off-street parking stalls be provided based on the amount of square footage dedicated to certain uses. The applicant submitted a parking study prepared by Walker Parking Consultants. A total of 2,055 parking spaces currently exist on the medical campus. There are also 186 parking spaces located to the south of the main campus, along Davis Ave. South. With the proposed additional 64 spaces and the deletion of 23 spaces at the entry court, a net total of 41 spaces would be added to the overall campus for a grand total of 2,282 spaces. The new surface parking lot does not appear to provide ADA accessible spaces. However, the applicant indicates that the campus currently provides 81 ADA accessible spaces. Per RMC 4-4-080F.g., the campus would require 33 ADA spaces; thus the project complies with this requirement. Density -Density is not applicable to this project as there is no residential component. Pedestrian Access -The CO zone requires a pedestrian connection from a public entrance to the street. The project would provide a pedestrian bridge from the new surface parking lot to the new entry lobby and patient drop off area. 3. Mitigation of Impacts to surrounding properties and uses; The proposed development of the site is not anticipated to impact adjacent properties and uses. The proposed building expansion and parking lot would be internal to the medical campus. To the west are other medical buildings and parking lots and even further to the west is State Route 167 bordering the site. To the east, across Talbot Rd. South, are medical and general offices under the jurisdiction of King County. To the south, across South 43rd St., are parking lots for the medical campus and other medical offices zoned COop and CO. According to code, parking lot lighting fixtures are to be non-glare and mounted no more than 25 feet above the ground. This is to help minimize the impact onto adjacent properties. The applicant is proposing to use 21 ft. high poles for the parking lot lighting. Potential short-term noise and traffic impacts would result from the initial construction of the project to adjacent properties. The applicant would be required to comply with existing code provisions that establish the allowed hours of construction activities for projects within 300 feet of residential uses to weekdays between the hours of 7:00 am and 8:00 pm. Construction activities are not permitted prior to 9:00 am on Saturdays and no work is permitted on Sundays. 4. Mitigation of impacts of the proposed site plan to the site; The building expansion is appropriate enhancement to the hospital building and the overall medical campus. The new entry lobby and surface parking lot and associated landscaping provide for an updated facility. The bulk and scale of the enclosure utilizes walls of glass and skylights to distinguish the entry from the remaining building favade. The site plan maintains the campus setting with a pedestrian bridge, landscaping, lighting and other amenities that enhance the site. The proposal is not expected to adversely impact the site. There are no significant natural or sensitive features on the property that would be impacted by the proposal. Construction activities related to the initial development of the project would be required to utilize best management practices through code requirements for an approved Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP). 5. Conservation of area-wide property values; The proposed building expansion and parking lot are expected to conserve property values in the vicinity of the site and provides additional landscaping to the campus. No additional employment opportunities would be provided to the City. City of Renton PIBIPW Department VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER EXPANSION Administrative Site Plan & Environm ..... al Review Committee Staff Report LUA-04-040, ECF, SA·A REPORT AND DECISION OF May 21,2004 Page 5 of 7 6. Safety and efficiency of vehicle and pedestrian circulation; Vehicular access to the site would remain as existing coming from Talbot Rd. South and S. 43rd Street to an internal circulation system within the medical campus. The new surface parking lot would be connected via a pedestrian bridge to the new entry lobby and drop-off area. A new driveway to the new surface parking lot would be constructed. The two circulation modes are defined by the use of a designated pedestrian bridge and two vehicular driveways plus a auto court for patient drop·off/load - unload and provides for safe and efficient separation. Construction truck hauling hours are limited to between 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. under the Development Guidelines Ordinance in order to avoid conflicts with peak hour traffic. The Traffic Planning Section will review construction-related impacts prior to issuing final construction permits. 7. Provision of adequate light and air; The new entry lobby would provide floor to ceiling glass to allow light to enter the building. The remodeled floors would also have windows to provide light and air to circulate around the building. It is anticipated that shadows would not be cast on public areas nor would a wind-tunnel effect occur due to the siting and height of the proposal. Exterior onsite lighting, including security and parking lot lighting, would be regulated by code. Compliance with this code (RMC 4·4-075) ensures that all building lights are directed onto the building or the ground and can not trespass beyond the property lines. Staff does not anticipate that exterior lighting would become an issue due to the siting of the building and parking lot and the adjacent uses provided code requirements are met. B. Mitigation of noise, odors and other harmful or unhealthy conditions; It is anticipated that the most significant noise, odor and other potentially harmful impacts would occur during the construction phase of the project. The applicant will be required to submit a Construction Mitigation Plan that provides measures to reduce construction impacts such as noise, control of dust, traffic controls, etc. prior to any construction/building permits being issued. The proposed development does not appear that it would not generate any harmful or unhealthy conditions. After project completion, vehicular traffic activities typically generate some additional noise; however, these levels would be those normally associated with the existing hospital, medical office and parking uses. 9. Availability of public services and facilities to accommodate the proposed use; and The current infrastructure includes the following existing conditions. There is an existing 12" water main looping the existing facilities. The modeled fire flow available at the site is approximately 4600 gpm. The proposed project is located within the 350-water pressure zone. The property is currently served by an 8" public sewer line. The site is served by on·site private surface water collection and conveyance facilities. Collected surface water is discharged to the Panther Creek wetlands. Several of the required improvements include: installing Storz fittings and replacing sub-standard fire hydrants. A Surface Water System Development charge for the new impervious surfaces would be required to be paid. Fire Department staff have indicated that the City's existing facilities and resources are adequate to accommodate the subject proposal, provided that the applicant pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee. The City's Environmental Review Committee required the applicant to pay a Fire Mitigation Fee in the amount of $0.52 per square foot of new building area. 10. Prevention of neighborhood deterioration and blight. The proposal would result in the remodeling and upgrading of existing facilities with coordinated site improvements including elements such as landscaping, parking and lighting. The expansion would further implement the vision of Valley Medical Center's Master Plan and would contribute to the overall campus environment. No deterioration or blight is expected to occur as a result of this proposal. City of Renton PIBIPW Department VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER EXPANSION Administrative Site Plan & Environm~ ..• 81 Review Committee Staff Report LUA-04-040, ECF, SA-A REPORT AND DECISION OF May 21, 2004 Page 6 of 7 XX Copies of all Review Comments are contained In the Official File. Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. D. Findings Having reviewed the written record in the matter, the City now enters the following: 1. Request: The Applicant has requested Environmental (SEPA) Review and Administrative Site Plan Approval for the Valley Medical Center Expansion, File No. LUA-04-040, ECF, SA-A. 2. Environmental Review: The applicant's file containing the application, State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation, the comments from various City departments, the public notices requesting citizen comment and other pertinent documents was entered as Exhibit NO.1. 3. Site Plan Review: The applicant's site plan application complies with the requirements for information for site plan review provided all advisory notes and conditions of approval are complied with. The applicant's site plan and other project drawings are entered as Exhibits No.2 through Exhibit NO.9. 4. Comprehensive Plan: The subject proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan land use designation of Center Institution (CI). 5. Zoning: The Site Plan as presented, complies with the zoning requirements and development standards of the Commercial Office -Public (CO-P) zoning designation, provided all conditions of approval are satisfied. 6. Existing Land Use: Land uses surrounding the subject site include: State Highway 167 to the west; surface parking lots and Medical Offices to the south zoned (CO & COoP); medical offices and offices to the east within King County; and hospital and medical office to the north zoned (CO-P). E. Conclusions 1. The subject proposal complies with the pOlicies and codes of the City of Renton, provided all advisory notes and conditions of approval, if any, are complied with. 2. The proposal complies with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Center Institution (CI); and the Zoning designation of Commercial Office -Public (CO-P). 3. Environmental (SEPA) review was conducted on the site in conjunction with the Administrative Site Plan Review application. F. Decision The Site Plan for the Valley Medical Center Expansion, File No. LUA-04-040, ECF, SA-A, Is approved. EFFECTIVE DATE OF DECISION ON LAND USE ACTION: SIGNATURES: t;l~ll/)f I Nell Watts, Development Services Director Date City of Renton PIBIPW Department VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER EXPANSION Administrative Site Plan & Environn,~ .. al Review Committee Staff Report LUA-04-040, ECF, SA-A REPORT AND DECISION OF May 21. 2004 TRANSMITTED this 21s/ day of May, 2004 to the owner/applicant: Valley Medical Center 400 South 43'd Street Renton, WA 98055 TRANSMITTED this 21 s/ day of May, 2004 to the contact: James Hobbs NBBJ 111 South Jackson SI. Seattle. WA 98104 TRANSMITTED this 21s/ day of May, 2004 to the following parties of record: No parties of record. TRANSMITTED 21 s/ day of May, 2004 to the following: Jennifer Henning, Development Planning Larry Meckling, Building Official Stan Engler, Fire Prevention Gregg Zimmerman, PBPW Administrator Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney South County Journal Page 7 of 7 Land Use Decision Appeal Process Appeals of the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM June 7, 2004. If no appeals are filed by this date, the action will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.E. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. EXPIRATION PERIODS: Site Plan Approvals (SA): Two (2) years from the final approval (signature) date. ~ ~ N r" "-, I I I I '. /~-------u' /1) a / cit<;:, ),_ ; .-. (CO) I _ (10-0) ;;;. tr-~st ......... \ ~ROJf[T / ~/;;" "~[4 !J (CO) / I 1 . _ J r I~' (CO)~(CO) :1 cr/ (CO) (00) bl~" : [ _~-,!'t_ --~ (CO) 1 (J~(OO) I ~) I ~l' _~ (CO) (CO) (CO) (R>H) (R>H) i i L~I (R-l.) _-.l-J •• ~" I II' ~ .,., ......... ! sc.r..:...r· '-=]00' RESIDENTI,l>..L ~:=~~~ ~ :~~ ~RW-I} RfSID£NilA.l .. utn-f" ..... I1..'f IIIoTIl,t COMMERCIAL (CO) COWMEP04!. 'J"TlCt C1T'r:..N.ITS--- ~) (10-1) (10-1) I -I (HuH) L nbbj 111 :.out!) Jock.sOtl Sa~t ~ott!!. WllStlinqton 90104 (206) 223-5555 r,. (7V£) 621-2.100 S~l' PEn Rel'iew Documents ,-\ "'"7:-nn i '. ~, \..ovtw i ~ ~'0Q8'. 1 \-=::_ :J \hlIey MediraJ Cenrer 400 South 43nl St Renton. Washingmt( Valley Medical Center Expansion Project ~~_~_""""'01"";;; ... -NE~D~ :10.-" •• ,..' ~ ~ .. -------- -:n''''''/~ 00..-_'r.Pt1 --}tW~t AO.OO -----_.---'----'-----------------~---~ ; IjJ Lt ~ I 'Tilllill ! I i I ! !~I"~I 0 p~ Ii , l'i Ir ~ ~.)~ , ' r( I ..-~ IIIIII i §'H ii 11.1 11;'11 !~i I -I ~ f '.~ I! I !"I i I , I~ ;Iti,~ , ,:.,O( I: \,';.-a I: I e-Ii ' I ',I I ,:~,Ii' ; --. __ . -------. -----------------. ------ u ~It~~ .Q !$~~ c: _ ,_, I; 0,··_· I G}--- l-IJ) J1~:1 I if I~ '.:: !v fh ~ l1l. . £ ~.j c:>-.-m-\.':--; I.! .. --, , ~I: I G)lLJ ,-I ~r-. , m.l·---i. • i' I !\ I • i : , : " I I (0 --.. -HI--_I 0--- {ii}-.'---. '-.. I .,1 " ®I! I ~I , , 'r 1 " I G --r-'- I 0-'--- 1 -~~ -;Fl'--~ 0-' ____ , __ =±~_. ____ i. I I' i ,,' I I II I • I I III I I II i ® -r I 11----i- il i ~ ii I I II I ® -I -11! _____ 1. II i .. II i , I 'I) I 1 .. 11 ®, __ , ___ ,-_1.;;_ __I ! -11 1 1 -ii ~ i 1 II I UIIIiJD II 0-i-=-----i~i ~ i i il -I~ I ~---y'!~I~--I..V ~I ----.- .1 i ii "I' I I i ,i i il i 1ilj-~r G-L~~--· ! I ~.- I i • i' -i ii i .... ·i u ~i-~i--'--+- i~i l i : .1 i.:i I 8 ~_~jj._._.i._ I I I! i I : [ :: .'- j : ii I w l---r'i'~~-' i 1 jj I ~:; ~ I, II I ~ ~I i!:: 1 m ~:Z • -.-·~-·-11--·-'-·-11 IJj: I' II i "': -I i il i @ c;-f1~~ I ' III!II ~ ~lv-Ij 1I11,I I I • _ 111I1 IU ' ~ • 111.1 II II I , ~ ED 111,1 1111;' f 8IDIIDII I I .-.-L.--J. I,=! ! I I i . . I I . _... I -1IiiliiDii I-.niii.iiiii - IIIDaIIII _I i I I Itld J « 1'--' -; - I i I .":\ ._._.-1'-. v -.-.- .. • i 1 I I ! , IIJ ~ ~t - III: I! II ~ I ,1;1 ~ !1 :i ~ ifi !FI J !~ If c::,-• ' LO • Ii 11.[ It 0 ';:" r~ il! L-I_ .. c::i I . ~ ~J il ~ "S I I I II~' I -, I « c: ~~ Ji I !. I ,: :~1 'I d..l I :;... :..w J,~ . -_.+ ~-"-~ ---- ~ I : _, ---- a j ~t ~ Sr~ : ! 1II11 ill lJ' ·;1 <0 ~ .~ ffiI'!!(,1 1i . ~ J ll· I~~ ~J " .. , [I, ,J!., ~ ':;:'" l· : 'I·' , 1 g ::;,:€ III g ·t~ , Jl I f. ~~ ~.J. " I I" « c:: ~,~ ~ :;...Li..I L ~-,I \li ,:, t, I • 'I , '1 ----,-}~ 111~_' I lJ.!lL __ ~~~;,I'::'j~: ... ~n •• ~.~~~:~~~~!mjJlI~ ___ d "I .{ 'I • ., .. . ~ ~ , , j .. I ~I I 1-!! ! ~~ •. --.. ' "" -····CAI .:; i .t ... (. L., i . ,_ ........ , _. __ ._ .............. -.. '~.'" -_._ .... " .. . R-14 \ \ \. ..... \ ) / ( \ \ , r------- Ri14 I I \.··"~~~··--i R-l S 55th St. \ \ \ ') / 1----..-----_______ __... e ZONING + ft + PIBIPW TBCHNICAL IIB1lVlCBS 1lI04/03 J3 -6 T11N R5E E 111 - - - -BeDUlD dlt,y Umt" 1'~ R-8 R I R-8 m •• ____ "' ~ It'" R-5i E ~;::=====~I z ~ R-8 ~O <lVO 11<1800 13 ~ONING MAP BGJK RBSIDIlNTIAL ~ Resource Conservation 8 R.BldenUal dulac IE] ReBldenUal ~ dulac a RosldenUal 8 dulac lB ResidenLial Manufactured Homes I R-IO I ReBldenUal 10 dulac I R-I<I ReBldenUal I. dulac I RH-\ I ResldenUal MulU-Family Inrill IRH-NI Residential MulU-Family Neighborhood Cenler ~H-C I ResldenUal MulU-Famlly Suburban Cenler MIXI!D USB CENTER o Center Neighborhood' ~ Center Suburban* ~C-Nll Urbon Contor -North ~ Urban Center -North 2 ~ Center Downtown- ~ Cenler Orrlee ReBldenUal COMMERCIAL @ Commercial Arterial* ~ Commercial Ofnco* o Convenience Commerctal INDUSTRIAL ~ InduBlrlBI -Hea., 0 Industrial -Medium 0 Induatrial -Lllht CP> Publicly owned ____ Renlon Clly Limits ___ AdJacenl Clly Limits ~ Dook Pagos Boundary KROLL PAGE IRH-r] RealdenUel (RH-U I Residential M lll-F II U b C .J.. .. f.> p •. For addlUonal reguloUon. In O.erloy MulU-Family Traditional . '~May Include O.erlay D1alrlcts. See Appendix u am y r an e '" D trleu. please aoe Rye "-3. PAGE# INDEX BECTtrOWNlJW«.lE -t. •• "/ -•. '.\"\.' "'i' '''1 '-I .. , .... I PROPERTY SE. ~ES FEE REVIEW #2004 -A DEVELOPMENT APPLICA nON REVIEW SHEET ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET o PLAN REVIEW ROUTING SLIP o OllIER RECEIVED FROM APPLICANT:~~~~~({\~~~~~r=~~~ __________ ___ JOB ADDRESS:_----'-"'''-''''-~._::___U.Co.____=~~'''"'I'.-.."..__t_-_.__r_I__::;___--WOH '9-7243 -----,(....-da-,-te..-)- NATURE OF WORK: o SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AND CONNECTI N FEF..s APPLIED ~ SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AND CONNECTION FEES ESTlMA TED o NOT APPROVED FOR APPLICATION OF FEF..s o VESTED 0 NOT VF..sTED GREEN # ______ _ NEED MORE INFORMATION: o SQUARE FOOTAGE o FRONT FOOTAGE o o o LEGAL DESCRIPTION VICINITY MAP OTImR o This fee review supersedes and cancels fee review 0 dated __ --=:--~=_== t:I 0 PARENT PIDO (subject to changeL SUBJECT PROPERTY PIOO vB67:<07 -0 lVJ~CO ,OJ cx)30 0 King Co. Tax AcctO (new) _______ _ It is the inlent of this development fee analysis to put Ille developer/owner on notice, that the fees quoted below may be applicable to the subject site upon development of the property. All quoted fees are potential charges Ilmt may be due and payable at Ille time the construction permit is issued to install dIe on-site and off-site improvements (i.e. underground utilities, street improvements, etc.) Triggering mechanisms for the SOC fees will be based on current City ordinances and determined by the applicable Utilily Section. Please note that these fees are sul~ject to change without notice. Finnl fees will be based on rates in effect at lime of Building Permit/Construction Permit application. The following quoted fees do NOT include inspection fees, side sewer permits, r/w permit fees or the cost of water meters. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PARCEL METHOD OF ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS NO. NO. ASSESSMENT UNITS OR FEE Latecomer Agreement (pvt) WATER Latecomer Agreement (pvt) W ASTEW A TER Latecomer Agreement (pvt)OTrmR 8.L{-O Co '"Dc:t ,~ Special Assessment DistricUW A TER Special Assessment District/W ASTEW A TER Joint Use Agreement (METRO) ~~. Local Improvement District '1·2-0~ -. Traffic Henefit Zones $75.00 PER TRIP CALCUl.,ATED HV TRANSPORTATrON FUTURE OBLlGATrONS Sai,TEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE -WATER H OF UNITS 1 SDC FEE Pd Prev. 0 Partially Pd (Ltd Exemption) 0 Never Pd SQ. FTG. Single family residential $1 ,S25/unit x Mobile home dwelline unit $1220/unlt in park Apartment Condo $91S/unit not in CD or COR zones x Commercial/Industrial, $0.213/sq. ft. of property (not less Ihan $1525.00) x Hoeing, hy Special AgreemenliFoolprinl of mllg plus 15 ft perimeter (1,800 GPM Ihresholdl I~TEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE -WASTEWATER . 11d Prevo 0 Pnrtially Pd (Ltd Exemption) 0 Never Pd S1nele family residential dwelling unit $900/unit x Mobile home dwelline unit $720/unit x Apartment, Condo $540/1lnlt not in CD or COR zones x Commercial/rndustrlal, $0.126/sq. ft. of property (llot less than $900.00) X . REDEVELOPMENT CREDIT: (New -Old Flow)/New Flow X Above Fees SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE -SURFACE~TER o Pel Prevo 0 Partially Pd (Ltd Exemption) Never Pd Sinele family residential and mobile home dwellint un1t $715/11nit x All other properties $0.249/sq ft of new impervious area of property x \ q) L.\ g-q-4) gS2-,Zep (not less Hum $715.00) ~ ~~ I PRELIMINARY TOTAL $ L-\-\ f"S') 2J n s, ,'''J;;~Vg h'!i,/~fard ~~af J '< N CD 0 III 0 11 .,. *If su )jecl' roperty IS within lin LID, it is developer's responsihility to check with the Finance Dept. for paid/un-paid status. 11 I CD **The square foolage ligures IIsed arc laken frolll Ihe King County Assessor's map and arc approximate only. < ~ ~. CD t: :l EFFECTIVE .laullar ' I, 211114 0 ~~~' ...u. -Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor May 19, 2004 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 CITY L_ F RENTON PlanningIBuildinglPublic Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator Subject: Environmental Determ inations Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on May 18, 2004: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NUMBER: LOCATION: DESCRIPTION: Valley Medical Center Expansion LUA04-040, ECF, SA-A 400 South 43rd Street (Northwest corner of Talbot Rd. & S 43rd St.) The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Administrative Site Plan approval for the expansion of the Valley Medical. Center including the enclosure of an existing courtyard, tenant improvements to' three floors, anew patient drop-off area and the conversion of the heliport into a 63 stall surface parking lot. The multi- parcel site is zoned Commercial Office wlth:a P suffix (CO-P). The proposed work includes portions of three parcels. Access would remain as existing,-froni S. 43rd St. and Talbot Rd. S. to internal drives. The . project also includes the installation of landscaping, a pedestrian bridge and other necessary improvements. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed In writing on or before 5:00 PM June 7, 2004. Appeals must be filed in writing together with.the required $75.00 application feewith: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 O.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. If you have questions, please call me at (425) 430-7382 Susan Fiala Senior Planner cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division WDFW, Stewart Reinbold David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources WSDOT, Northwest Region . ~E~n~ClmosrnU~:ruw_a_m_i_sh_T_r_ib_al_O_ff_iC_e----_____________________________ ~RE· N TO N 1055 South Grady Way -Renton, Washjngton 98055 * This paper contains 50% recyclod motorial, 30% post consumer AI·IEAn OF THE CURVE CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 20"1 day of April, 2004, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Notice of Application documents. This information was sent to: Agencies See Attached •• ~--~'-: ...... ·· .. 11()~\ ,: .·:,,\SSIO~ ~' •• ~ " ~==::;'&::..4:::;;;::;;;:~2::.....e:..~~==::::::::::""--------.j."':.....:::s:'-+,'~' t:~-;-;o,.' ""'+.0', \:.(\ '~ : : ~ TA~~~'" ~ ~ S ; .. ~: i I.: .-.: ~ SS ~ ~ \ ,QUeLle . ! '-V\ ... ~! COUNTY OF KING I" ~ ··'~:29.01 .... '·~O .; "1 Of::' ........ .,.\() -- '" WAS~\" .... .. I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Patrick Roduln I",,,,, .................... ... signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: 6"/ 2f//rJ Y _---;;--=--/7~~~~~~=_:~---:-:-:-:__:_:--- Notary (Print): ____ -'MlIUA:lCRu./I vntlllj..$ll(~Aa~AC.il=lHISEF$*'------------- My appOintment expires: MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES 6-29.07 template· affidavit of service by mailing .. Dept. of Ecology' Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 WSDOT Northwest Region' Attn: Ramin Pazooki King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240 PO Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 US Army Corp. of Engineers' Seattle District Office Attn: SEPA Reviewer PO Box C-3755 Seattle, WA 98124 Jamey Taylor' Depart. of Natural Resources PO Box 47015 ~ia, WA 98504-7015 KC Dev. & Environmental Servo Attn: SEPA Section 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 Metro Transit Senior Environmental Planner Gary Kriedt AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING (ERe DETERMINATIONS) WDFW -Stewart Reinbold' Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. c/o Department of Ecology . 3190160111 Ave SE Attn. SEPA Reviewer Bellevue, WA 98008 39015 -172nd Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092 Duwamish Tribal Office' Mucklesl100t Cultural Resources Program 14235 Ambaum Blvd. SW -Front A . Burien, WA 98166 Attn: Ms Melissa Calvert 39015172nd Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092-9763 KC Wastewater Treatment Division' Office of Archaeology & Historic Environmental Planning Supervisor Preservation' Ms. Shirley Marroquin Attn: Stephanie Kramer 201 S. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050 PO Box 48343 Seattle WA 98104-3855 Olympia, WA 98504-8343 City of Newcastle City of Kent Attn: Mr. Micheal E. Nicholson Attn: Mr. Fred Satterstrom, AICP Director of Community Development Acting Community Dev. Director 13020 SE 72nd Place 220 Fourth Avenue South Newcastle, WA 98059 Kent, WA 98032-5895 Puget Sound Energy City of Tukwila Municipal Liason Manager Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official Joe Jainga 6300 Southcenter Blvd. 201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431 PO Box 90868, MS: XRD-01W Tukwila, WA 98188 Seattle, WA 98104-3856 Bellevue WA 98009-0868 Seattle Public Utilities Real Estate Services Eric Swennson 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 Seattle, WA 98104-5004 Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS", the marked agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy of the checklist, PMT's, and the notice of application. • Also note, do not mali Jamey Taylor any of the notices she gets hers from the web. Only send her the ERC Determination paperwork. template -affidavit of service by mailing , '- ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (DNS-M) POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NUMBER: LOCATION: DESCRIPTION: VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER EXPANSION LUA04-040, ECF, SA·A 400 SOUTH 43RD STREET (NORTHWEST CORNER OF TALBOT RD & S 43RD ST) THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING ENVIRONMENTAL (SEPA) REVIEW AND ADMINISTRATIVE SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR THE EXPANSION OF THE VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER INCLUDING THE ENCLOSURE OF AN EXISTING COURTY ARD, TENANT IMPROVEMENTS TO THREE FLOORS, A NEW PATIENT DROP·OFF AREA AND THE CONVERSION OF THE HELIPORT INTO A 63 STALL SURFACE PARKING LOT. THE MUL TI·PARCEL SITE IS ZONED COMMERCIAL OFFICE WITH A P SUFFIX (CO·P). THE PROPOSED WORK INCLUDES PORTIONS OF THREE PARCELS. ACCESS WOULD REMAIN AS EXISTING, FROM S. 43RD ST. AND TALBOT RD. S. TO INTERNAL DRIVES. THE PROJECT ALSO INCLUDES THE INSTALLATION OF LANDSCAPING, A PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE AND OTHER NECESSARY IMPROVEMENTS. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT AbVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. APPEALS OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION MUST BE FILED IN WRITING ON OR BEFORE 5:00 PM JUNE 7, 2004. APPEALS MUST BE FILED IN WRITING TOGETHER WITH THE REQUIRED $75.00 APPLICATION FEE WITH: HEARING EXAMINER, CITY OF RENTON, 1055 SOUTH GRADY WAY, RENTON, WA 98055. APPEALS TO THE EXAMINER ARE GOVERNED BY CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 4·8·110.B. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE APPEAL PROCESS MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE RENTON CITY CLERK'S OFFICE, (425) 430·6510. (O-t) (CO) (CO) : --.5TH-Pl ---()-~-I_--~~) J L __ (CO)_ I, :1- (JtW-I) (11 ... 94\ FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT (425) 430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): PROJECT NAME: APPLICANT: LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: LEAD AGENCY: LUA04-040, ECF, SA-A Valley Medical Center Expansion Valley Medical Center 400 South 43rd Street (Northwest corner of Talbot Rd. & S 43rd St.) The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Administrative Site Plan approval for the expansion of the Valley Medical Center including the enclosure of an existing courtyard, tenant improvements to three floors, a new patient drop-off area and the conversion of the heliport into a 63 stall surface parking lot. The mUlti- parcel site is zoned Commercial Office with a P suffix (CO-P). The proposed work includes portions of three parcels. Access would remain as existing, from S. 43rd St. and Talbot Rd. S. to internal drives. The project also includes the installation of landscaping, a pedestrian bridge and other necessary improvements. The City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental Information provided In conjunction with the environmental determinatIon. Because these notes are provided as Information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Planning 1. The subject site is located within the Commercial Office (CO) zoning with a Public Use (P-suffix) designation and Center Institution (CI) Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designation. 2. Commercial, multi-family, new single family and other nonresidential construction activities shall be restricted to the hours between seven o'clock (7:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m., Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays shall be restricted to the hours between nine o'clock (9:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m. No work shall be permitted on Sundays. Building 1. No comments at this time. Fire pepartment 1. The fire flow requirements remain unchanged. The existing looped water mains and fire hydrants are adequate for the proposed project. 2. The fire sprinkler system shall be extended throughout the addition. 3. The fire alarm system shall be extended throughout the addition. 4. Fire department access as proposed is adequate. Strongly recommend signage and a physical barrier, i.e. overhead cross-bar, to limit access of over-sized vehicles to the patient load/unload area. Plan Review -Sanitary Sewer 1. Our records indicate that the Sewer System Development fees and Special Assessment District fees have been paid-in-full. Plan Review -Water 1. Our records indicate that the Water System Development fees and Special Assessment District fees have been paid-in-full. 2. Any eXisting sub-standard t',,;1 hydrants will be required to be replac. ...... and/or retrofitted with a quick disconnect Storz fitting. 3. Separate plans and permits are necessary for any new fire sprinkler systems and associated double detector check valve assemblies. Plan Review -Surface Water 1. A Surface Water System Development Charge (SOC) is required for this site. This fee is calculated on the new impervious surfaces added to the site. Based on the submitted information, the SOC fee for this development will be $4,852.26. 2. New development of the site requires storm and surface water drainage improvements in accordance with the King County 1990 Surface Water Design Standards. The Technical Information Report, submitted with this application, provided an analysis that covered the core submittal requirements. Plan Revjew -Transportation 1. The application states that no new trips will be generated with this project. Therefore a Traffic Impact Analysis is not required. Plan Review -General 1. All plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. 2. A construction permit is required. Please submit three copies of the drawings, two copies of the drainage report, a construction estimate, application form, and appropriate fees to the sixth floor customer service counter. CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): PROJECT NAME: APPLICANT: LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: LEAD AGENCY: MITIGATION MEASURES; LUA04-040, ECF, SA-A Valley Medical Center Expansion Valley Medical Center 400 South 43rd Street (Northwest corner of Talbot Rd. & S 43rd St.) The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Administrative Site Plan approval for the expansion of the Valley Medical Center including the enclosure of an existing courtyard, tenant improvements to three floors, a new patient drop-off area and the conversion of the heliport into a 63 stall surface parking lot. The multi- parcel site is zoned Commercial Office with a P suffix (CO-P). The proposed work includes portions of three parcels. Access would remain as existing, from S. 43rd St. and Talbot Rd. S. to internal drives. The project also includes the installation of landscaping, a pedestrian bridge and other necessary improvements. The project consists of 105,000 sq. ft. of remodeling and 20,000 sq. ft. of new exterior building enclosure. A new auto court would be provided and pedestrian bridge from the new surface parking lot to the new entrance and drop off area. The existing heliport is proposed to be removed and replaced with a 64 stall surface parking lot. The City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section 1. Prior to any construction activities on the site Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control (TESC) shall be installed in accordance with the Department of Ecology's (DOE) Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements, outlined in Volume" of the 2001 Stormwater Management Manual, and to the satisfaction of the Development Services Division representative 2. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee based on $0.52 per square foot of new building area. The fee shall be paid prior to the issuance of building permits. ~ CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-04-040, ECF, SA-A APPLICANT: Valley Medical Center PROJECT NAME: Valley Medical Center Expansion DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Administrative Site Plan approval for the expansion of the Valley Medical Center including the enclosure of an existing courtyard, tenant improvements to three floors, a new patient drop-off area and the conversion of the heliport into a 63 stall surface parking lot. The multi-parcel site is zoned Commercial Office with a P suffix (CO-P). The proposed work includes portions of three parcels. Access would be remain as existing, from S. 43rd St. and Talbot Rd. S. to internal drives. The project also includes the installation of landscaping, a pedestrian bridge and other necessary improvements. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: LEAD AGENCY: 400 South 43rd Street (Northwest corner of Talbot Rd. and S. 43rd St.) The City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. Appeals of the environmental determination must be flied In writing on or before 5:00 PM June 7, 2004. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton MuniCipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: DATE OF DECISION: SIGNATURES: Gregg Zimmerman, Administrator I Department of Planning/Building/Public Works May 24,2004 May 18, 2004 Iv(UkI 1& 1 2004 DATE I DATE) , STAFF REPORT A. BACKGROUND ERC MEETING DA TE Project Name: Owner/Applicant: Contact: File Number: Project Description: Project Location: Exist. Bldg. Area gsf: Site Area: RECOMMENDA TION: Project Location Map City of Renton Department of Planning / Building / Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE May 18, 2004 Valley Medical Center Expansion Valley Medical Center 400 South 43rd Street, Renton, WA 98055 James Hobbs of NBBJ, 111 South Jackson St., Seattle, WA 98104 LUA-04-040, ECF, SA-A Project Manager: Susan A. Fiala, AICP The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Administrative Site Plan approval for the expansion of the Valley Medical Center including the enclosure of an existing courtyard, tenant improvements to three floors, a new patient drop-off area and the conversion of the heliport into a 63 stall surface parking lot. The multi- parcel site is zoned Commercial Office with a P suffix (CO-P). The proposed work includes portions of three parcels. Access would be remain as existing, from S. 43rd st. and Talbot Rd. S. to internal drives. The project also includes the installation of landscaping, a pedestrian bridge and other necessary improvements. Continued on next page 400 South 43rd Street (Northwest corner of Talbot Rd. and S. 43rd St.) 348,150 sq. ft. Proposed New Bldg. Area: 23,600 sq. ft. 1,055,589 sq. ft. (24.23 acres- gross) Total Building Area gsf: 371,750 sq. ft. Staff recommends that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Non-Significance -Mitigated (DNS-M). ~,:~ .. . /" .... .......... ~ ..... --, (R-8) '-. . au-_CT-l--- 5 .JRD (0-1) (-/1 }-,.....,(CO .. )! I [(CO)' I ! /) fl.' (CO) I I (CO) ! I! /,., ,iLt~co) I~) i 1_-,- ./ ;./ / /"-/;----(C;,; I (CO) J. --! 'I I I( (CO) /:····r--I-=-I r I I /! r ' § :' ,,' / __ •. __ (C~. I 'ii (CO) (CO) "i i I I / ) (CO) I <5111 PL ... ,--'---L;(R_1)~ , -/1' / i/ L (I ~_(CO)-I -;~_J l' (CO) -~: It /. . :---. -l , I, ./ ( ...... ) I i '0_''' "i . ercrptVMC. doc City of Renton PIB/PW Deparlment VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER EXPANSION"' REPORT OF MA Y 18, 2004 Enviro Ila/ Review Committee Staff Reporl LUA-04-040, ECF, SA-A Page 2 of 8 PROJECT DESCRIPTION CONTINUED: The project consists of 105,000 sq. ft. of remodeling and 20,000 sq. ft. of new exterior building enclosure. A new auto court would be provided and pedestrian bridge from the new surface parking lot to the new entrance and drop off area. The existing heliport is proposed to be removed and replaced with a 64 stall surface parking lot. The applicant is proposing to enclose an existing courtyard and fountain feature to accommodate a new entry lobby, a drop off for hospital and surgery patients, and provide additional space for the surgery department, admitting, gift shop and support space. Interior remodeling is proposed to the third floor for the surgery department to have ten new surgeries, 26 pre-op post-op rooms and an expansion to the west would provide a corridor and stairs for the new surgeries. The existing surgery department on the second floor would be gutted and remodeled for eight new surgery spaces. The existing family birthing center on the second floor would be gutted and remodeled to contain a new family center with 36 labor delivery, recovery postpartum rooms and support space. The existing children's therapy department adjacent to the family center will be relocated to an off campus site. The vacated space would be remodeled to contain a new Level III Neonatal Intensive Care Unit for 23 babies. There would be a small building expansion to the north to contain a new corridor and patio for the family center. The Valley Medical Center campus is located to the northwest of the intersection of South 43r(i SI. and Talbot Road South. The site fronts both streets. The subject expansion would occur on the south campus area on portions of three parcels. The three parcels total 24.3 acres -gross, however, the proposed work would be located only on a portion of the large parcels that cover the majority of the campus. The applicant indicates that the project must be constructed in multiple phases in order to maintain continuous 24- hour hospital operations. The work is proposed to begin in the Summer of 2004 and end in Fall of 2006. Landscaping would be installed along the interior and perimeter of the parking lot as well as within the auto court. B. RECOMMENDA TlON Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINA TION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Issue DNS with 14 da A eal Period. Issue DNS with 15 day Comment Period with Concurrent 14 day Appeal Period. C. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS DETERMINA TION OF XX NON -SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGA TED. XX Issue DNS-M with 14 da A eal Period. Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period with Concurrent 14 day Appeal Period. In compliance with RCW 43.21 C. 240, the following project environmental review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. 1. Earth Impacts: The subject site can be described as follows: the location of the new parking lot would be at the same grade as the existing helicopter landing pad and slopes up to the east at a ten percent grade. The ground surface in this portion of the project area ranges from Elevatiqn 95 IS ft. to Elevation 108 ft. along the east side of the proposed access road. The expansion of the surgery center would occur on ground that is flat. The majority of the redevelopment areas are existing impervious surfaces with some landscaping to be removed for the new access drive to the surface parking lot. The applicant submitted a Geotechnical Report prepared by GeoEngineers, dated January 22, 2004 with the land use application. Tile report addressed soils, groundwater, construction and foundation techniques and site preparation for the parking lot and pedestrian bridge. The expansion of the structure was not evaluated as part of this study; however, a Memorandum, dated May 20, 2003, prepared by Geo Engineers evaluated the foundation system of the hospital expansion. The soils identified are Alderwood gravelly sandy loam based on the King County Soil Survey of November 1973. The USGS maps the site as Ground moraine deposits that are mostly ablation and lodgment till consisting of sand, silt, ercrptVMC.doc City of Renton PIBIPW Department VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER EXPANSIOf,f RfEPORT OF MA Y 1 B. 2004 Enviro ltal Review Committee Staff Report LUA-04-040, ECF, SA-A Page 3 of B clay an gravel which are typically poorly drained. Groundwater was encountered at one location tested which was noted as containing a small amount of perched groundwater. The results of the report indicate that the proposed pedestrian bridge and parking lot can be constructed as proposed provided the considerations and recommendations contained within the geotechnical report are followed. The memorandum also indicates that the design load for a column and footing can support the loads as proposed. Earthwork activities include the removal of the existing helicopter landing pad, landscaping within the work area and excavation. Excavation depths at the east end of the parking lot would range up to 15 feet. Some fill would be required to replace unsuitable fill or native soils below wall footings and pavement areas. The report continues to state that site preparation and earthwork be completed during drier summer months as the existing soils have a relatively high fines content and are moisture sensitive. Operation of equipment would be difficult on these soils during wet weather. The applicant is proposing to utilize TESCP measures as required to comply with code. In order to reduce the potential for erosion and control sedimentation, staff recommends additional mitigation to reduce potential erosion and sedimentation impacts to the site and to adjacent properties including that the project be designed and comply with the Department of Ecology's (DOE) Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements, outlined in Volume II of the 2001 Stormwater Management Manual. Mitigation Measures: Prior to any construction activities on the site Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control (TESC) shall be installed in accordance with the Department of Ecology's (DOE) Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements, outlined in Volume II of the 2001 Stormwater Management Manual, and to the satisfaction of the Development Services Division representative. Policy Nexus: SEPA Environmental Regulations. 2. Surface Water Impacts: The site is served by on-site private surface water collection and conveyance facilities. Collected surface water is discharged to the Panther Creek wetlands. The applicant submitted a Preliminary Storm Drainage Report prepared by Magnusson Klemencic Associates, dated February 12, 2004. The proposed storm drainage system would collect stormwater runoff in new catch basins and convey stormwater to a new stormwater management vault where runoff will be detained and treated. The detention system would be located west of the new surface parking lot beneath the existing doctor's parking lot. To compensate for areas of improvements that can not be drained to the stormwater management vault by gravity, the existing doctor' s parking lot would be re-plumbed to drain into the vault. The stormwater vault would discharge to an existing storm drain manhole with a 12-inch discharge pipe to the existing conveyance system approximately 50 feet away. The report continues to state that the proposed stormwater facility will not be able to capture all of the proposed new paved areas due to grading constraints. The detention calculations have compensated for these areas by detaining more volume of runoff from the parking lot than otherwise required. In a similar approach, the water quality treatment volume is sized to accommodate runoff from the existing doctor's parking lot in the capture area to compensate for those proposed areas that could not be routed to the facility. The conceptual drainage plan and report submitted, meets the requirements of the 1990 King County Surface Water Drainage Manual (KCSWDM) criteria. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation is recommended. Policy Nexus: N/A 3. AccesslTransportatlon Impacts: Access to the site is from both Talbot Rd. So. and S. 43rd SI. Street frontage improvements are in place, no additional improvements are required. Internal drives provide circulation throughout the campus. A new driveway would be constructed to provide access to the new surface parking lot and would come off of an existing internal drive located between the hospital and new surface parking lot. No new driveways to public roads are proposed. The applicant has indicated that there would be no new trips generated by the expansion and new parking lot. Therefore, no Transportation Mitigation Fee is required. ercrptVMC.doc City of Renton PIBIPW Department VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER EXPANSION REPORT OF MA Y 1 B, 2004 Enviro. Ital Review Committee Staff Report LUA·04·040, ECF, SA·A Page 4 of 8 A parking study was submitted with the application as prepared by Walker Parking Consultants, dated May 7, 2002. The total number of parking spaces available is 2,055 on the main campus area, north of S. 43rd St. with 186 spaces located in parking lots on the south side of S. 43rd St. Tile proposal would eliminate 23 parking spaces at the entry court, add 63 parking spaces in the new lot for a net increase of 40 parking spaces for a new campus wide total of 2,281 spaces. See additional discussion in Site Plan review. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation is recommended. Policy Nexus: N/A 4. Fire Protection Impacts: Fire Prevention staff indicate that sufficient resources exist to furnish services to the proposed development, subject to the condition that the applicant provide required improvements and fees. The proposal would add new construction to the City, which would potentially impact the City's Fire Emergency Services. Therefore, the applicant will be required to pay a Fire Mitigation Fee based on $0.52 per square foot of new building area. The total fee is estimated at $10,400.00 ($0.52 x 20,000 sq. ft.) and is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee based on $0.52 per square foot of new building area. The fee shall be paid prior to the issuance of building permits. Policy Nexus: SEPA Environmental Regulations; Fire Mitigation Fee Resolution No. 2913, Ordinance 4527. D. MITIGA TION MEASURES 1. Prior to any construction activities on the site Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control (TESC) shall be installed in accordance with the Department of Ecology's (DOE) Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements, outlined in Volume II of the 2001 Stormwater Management Manual, and to the satisfaction of the Development Services Division representative 2. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee based on $0.52 per square foot of new building area. The fee shall be paid prior to the issuance of building permits. E. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS The proposal has been circulated to CIty Departmental/DivisIonal Reviewers for their review. Where applicable, these comments have been Incorporated into the text of this report as Mitigation Measures and/or Notes to Applicant. -K-Caples of al/ Review Comments are contained in the Official File. Caples of aI/ Review Comments are attached to this report. Advisory Notes to Applicant: The fol/owlng notes are supplemental Information provided In conjunctIon with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as Information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Planning 1. The subject site is located within the Commercial Office (CO) zoning with a Public Use (P-suffix) designation and Center Institution (CI) Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map deSignation. 2. Commercial, multi-family, new single family and other nonresidential construction activities shall be restricted to the hours between seven o'clock (7:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m., Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays shall be restricted to the hours between nine o'clock (9:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m. No work shall be permitted on Sundays. Building 1. No comments at this time. Fire Department 1. The fire flow requirements remain unchanged. The existing looped water mains and fire hydrants are adequate for the proposed project. 2. The fire sprinkler system shall be extended throughout the addition. 3. The fire alarm system shall be extended throughout the addition. 4. Fire de artment access as ro osed is ade uate. Stron I recommend si i.e. ercrptVMC.doc City of Renton PIBIPW Oeparlment VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER EXPANSION REPORT OF MA Y 1 B, 2004 Enviro Jtal Review Committee Staff Reporl LUA-04-040, ECF, SA-A Page 5 of B overhead cross-bar, to limit access of over-sized vehicles to the patient load/unload area. Plan Review -Sanitary Sewer 1. Our records indicate that the Sewer System Development fees and Special Assessment District fees have been paid-in-full . Plan Review -Water 1. Our records indicate that the Water System Development fees and Special Assessment District fees have been paid-in-fuli. 2. Any existing sub-standard fire hydrants will be required to be replaced and/or retrofitted with a quick disconnect Storz fitting. 3. Separate plans and permits are necessary for any new fire sprinkler systems and associated double detector check valve assemblies. Plan Review -Surface Water 1. A Surface Water System Development Charge (SOC) is required for this site. This fee is calculated on the new impervious surfaces added to the site. Based on the submitted information, the SOC fee for this development will be $4,852.26. 2. New development of the site requires storm and surface water drainage improvements in accordance with the King County 1990 Surface Water Design Standards. The Technical Information Report, submitted with this application, provided an analysis that covered the"core submittal requirements. Plan Review -Transportation 1. The application states that no new trips will be generated with this project. Therefore a Traffic Impact Analysis is not required. Plan Review -General 1. All plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. 2. A construction permit is required. Please submit three copies of the drawings, two copies of the drainage report, a construction estimate, a lication form, and a ro riate fees to the sixth floor customer service counter. Environmental Determination Appeal Process Appeals of the environmental determination must be flied in writing on or before 5:00 PM June 7, 2004. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 O.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. ercrplVMC.doc i . \ .j 1 ~'~j 'F: .h r f j] ~ !IIIIII I f I f I' , i -f \ ! ; ; .j ! J Li pa ih to -------0-.--------_. ---------_ .. ---.-----.- ! ~ I :1 ill!illl fill!;: II !I'i 0 C! ~.j ! Ii! i: i.l ~ -I .;; .1111 1,1 'I'~' [lid I ,II': 'II1II 'II fl. \ , 0···- ! ®-t ..... I &-~I 0·- ~dJ~f~l . Illilll III ~il! ~lil <C I !I j 6 '0 • .~ I I" I II -I III I ~ • 111 1' I' 1.1 : '. M EEl I, II I' III 1. I ~;jl.J: I <C t-n-t~. I I . ;! I: I .. .. ------.. -P r ____ ._, ij j Lt ~ i r.~ llll.q p~ ri .:\ I. ~ a-~ i~" §'h ~J e 1'·; IJl i ~,~~; .!I III • ;;. H .L.I. _I .. ,. /' ~~::~'" ,,'l£.,I~ Fr-:~~i;;j~~~~~. i" f '\ t l' , ~",.".,. . ,_,' . i.",,,' .... ,I .. ', •. ',1,_ l~':;~ '.-:':. .. ,..............\, ....... i - --- I !1~li II - 1) ~ 111.1 11 :Q' It~~ ,Il ~ Ill; i ~h~ '" • J, I~: ~, . ", " , -' '.," " " I ~ j ! I!t II I §!i §1 .. ", ~,.; _ /';;,'r!:; "'.1< " ._,;.< \i' '.. :.~' ., " t ,'t~i2~·A "·1 ir .-C\J N o " I.," , , . ,/' ~ . ,,! . , " I • I "'j' .' , i' • ,.1. '., ,' . . '\' . ~i~~~ ... ·,.i' .... " t .. ii", ; ., '~t, . ______ • _____________ ..J ... ~.~ 'i' '3.~" 0 -~ ~~'"<l2>:'O""=-I\ ... Dc.m ... Jn .... _~~ -------------.~----.--- _:<,J." /~1;~~~:,:._ 'i' , " ~-. 'i' ----------------- ""'" I. IfIIIIll CI.a ,. .... c:El, ~ __ .. I&U.,. Z. lI!!.:r.a.CI"''II'I'tLmcm -' : 'P,;':" '\,1 ,\\.':.'" .-.,\ ,,/ .. ' ", \1 \" nbbj 11Iba.-..,... s.:a~~ .... ""'" ...... """" Siu:P!mRmew Dot:uu=ts I~-I- =-=== . .=:.~~ 9'1illeyMdDlc..- .cooSo=:!a~St _W_ . ~ ::, ~.\ '. e "=.=.' ~r. • . -,;" .' :.--;. .... ~. " < ~~;~':~: .:~ .. ,.::". .. .. "~" .:.>~. :~:<J~}i!4 Valky M:diaI CtlIltI Exjm;ion Prop .~~~~:~-;: C2.32 : nbbj n1!!l::11*.-=-:r. ... ----.... ""'" ... ""' ...... Siu:P!mRmew DoaIm!:!l!s ~~-I- ._::.7Se ~ ~-raa&l 9It!!l<)'-c..- 400 Soc6 4l:d 51 Rc:IuIn. Wa:sttmpm ValkyMedir.!lCtllltl Expansion Projea ---~.---- -. -------- -~~""'"=-----.---trIQI!I!!. ~---~=-.-~s:--. __ -------- C2.32 co ... \ R M -d-···r-·····-" ! ............ : L ............ _ .. .. R .. : n ~.~-..... -.. -.... r·,·ll, R-14 R-l S 55th St. -----...-------------------... """ e ZONING + !R + PIBIPW TBCHNICAL BBllVlCBS N UlOfIOl J3 • 6 T22N RSE E 1/2 R-8 R SE ! RM-I R-8 I .• _ ....... _ ••• ..1 R.=.lO. 13 31 T23N RSE E 1/2 5331 LONING MAP B00K RESIDENTIAL [§£J Resource Conservation EJ ResldenUal dulac § ResidenUal 5 dulac 8 ResldenU.1 8 dulac ~ Residential Monufnctured Homel 10-10 I ResldenUal 10 du/.c 10-141 ReBldenU.1 \4 du/.o 10H-11 Re.ld.nU.1 YulU-Vamily lornl [~H-NI ResidenUal MulU-Famlly Neighborhood Cenler ~H-C I Re.ld.nU.1 YuIU-V.mily Suburb.D Center MIXBD USE CENTER o Center Neighborhood- ~ Center Suburban- ~C-Nli Urban Center -North PC-N2\ Urban Center -North 2 o Centor Downtown- CE§] Con tor Ortice RooidonUol COMMERCIAL ~ Commercial Arteriol· @] Commercial OCnee· [cc I Convenience Commercial ,to INpuSTRIAL m Industrial -H.avy o Industrial -Medium o Industrial -LIght CP) Publicly o1t'ne~ ___ Renton City LImits ___ AdJ.cent City LImits _ Book PalOS Boundary KROLL PAGE [RH-r I ResldeDUal YuIU-F.mily TradiUonal [OH-U I Re.idenUal MuIU-F.mily Urban Cenlsr" • Yay inolud. av.rlQ,Y"Distrlots. See Appendl. map •• For .ddiUonal aresuibUoDs In Ov.rl.y DIBtrlcts, pl ••••• oe 'nMC 4-3. ,,' , PAGE# INDEX SeCTfTO\\wRANGE OEVELOPME '. . CITY OF~kNTO~~II"Jl. MAYO 6 20C:} CITY OF RENTON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT RECEIVED NEIGHBORHOODS, AND STRATEGIC PLANNING MEMORANDUM DATE: TO: FROM: ST AFF CONTACT: SUBJECT: April 30, 2004 Susan Fiala Rebe~~ Don Erickson Valley Medical Center Expansion, 400 South 43rd Street; LUA- 04-040, SA-A, ECF Staff reviewed this proposal as a pre-application on December 2, 2003 (see attachment) and that time supported in concept this proposed minor physical expansion and large interior remodel of the main hospital wing. At that time staff stated that the applicant should be asked to provide additional material showing, how the subject proposal related to their draft 1991 Valley Medical Center Master Plan and other growth related activities on their campus. Policy LU-142 was intended to forestall uncoordinated piecemealing of new development within institutional campuses. Recent applications from this institution suggest that such an approach is unfortunately continuing. Recommendation: Support this application but encourage the applicant to consider developing a lO-year master plan that would allow them and the City to look ahead and address the impacts of such development in a more collaborative way. Attachment cc: Don Erickson H:\EDNSP\lntcrdcpartlllt:ntllI\Develnpll1ent Review\Green Filc\Collllllcnts\Vallcy Medical Ccnter Expansion.doc\cor CITY OF RENTON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT NEIGHBORHOODS, AND STRA TEGIC PLANNING MEMORANDUM DATE: TO: FROM: ST AFF CONTDACT: SUBJECT: December 2. 2003 Susan Fiala Rebecca Lind Don Erickson Valley Medical Center Expansion. 400 South 43rd Street; PRE 03-116 The applicant is proposing a major remodel and expansion of the existing Valley Medical Center. These are discussed below: 3rd Floor Changes: The project includes vacating office space on the 3rd floor and remodeling it for an expanded surgery department with 10 new surgery suites. 26 Pre-operationlPost-operation rooms. and support space. The existing 3rd floor courtyard and fountain will be enclosed with additional space provided for the surgery department. admitting. gift shop. support space and new drop-off area for hospital and surgery patients. The proposal also includes a new parking lot with space for 73 cars on the south of the site. replacing the existing heliport. 2nd Floor Changes: The project includes totally remodeling the existing surgery department on the second floor and replacing it with eight new surgical suites and support space. In addition. the existing family birthing center on the second floor is to be totally remodeled to contain a new family center with 36 labor delivery/recovery/postpartum rooms and support space. An existing children's therapy department adjacent to the family center is to be relocated off campus and its space remodeled into a new Level III Neonatal Intensive Care Unit for 23 babies. A new corridor and patio are also proposed on the north of this floor. The site is designated Center Institution (Cn on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map and zoned Commercial Office (CO). Attached is a list of relevant Land Use Policies. Analysis: Whereas Valley Medical Center complies with Policy LU-140 by being located in the Center Institution designation. it is less successful in complying with Policies LU-141 and LU-142. Although VMC completed a master campus plan in July of 1991. it was never adopted even though it contained provisions pertaining to land use. urban design. zoning, transportation. and phasing. None of the applicant's narrative addressed how, if at all, this proposed expansion related to the 1991 Master Plan or provides the reader with any indication of the size of this expansion in square feet. Although much of Phase I was completed it would be useful to know whether the proposed scope of work related in any way to either Phase II or Phase III identified in the Master Plan. Valley Medical Center 2004 BxpansionlRemodel 04/30104 Recommendation: 2 Support in concept this proposed apparently minor expansion and large interior remodel of the main hospital building. The applicant should be asked to provide additional material showing. how the subject proposal relates to their draft 1991 Valley Medical Center Master Plan and future growth related activities on their campus. For instance. staff only a month or so reviewed a proposal for the reconstruction of a parking lot on their South Campus but had no idea that this might be related to the current building activity. Attachment cc: Don Erickson H :\BDN S P\lnterdcpartrnClllal\Dcveloprncll t Rcview\Preapps\Cornrncnts\CI\ Valley Medical Center Bxpansion ,doc\cor Valley Medical Center 2004 BxpansionlRemodel 04/30104 Relevant Comprehensive Plan Land Use Policies: 3 Policy LU-140. Regional health andlor medical facilities larger than five acres should be located in institution medical centers. Policy LU-141. Medical an{l/or medical facilities institutions within the designated Center boundary area should be master-planned to be consistent with local and regional comprehensive plans. Policy LU-142. Expansion of these existing campus facilities (i.e. Renton Technical College. Valley Medical Center) should be limited IIntil the master plans have been approved by the City. H:\EDNSP\lnlcrdcparlmenlal\Dcvelopmenl Review\Preapps\Comments\CI\ Valley Medical Center Expansion.doc\cor ~' City of Rein Oepal1ment of Planning / Building / Public V\tuIKS ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: tZLD, 'Ce-"e.lf\O~n4 COMMENTS DUE: MAY 4,2004 APPUCATION NO: LUA-04-040, SA-A, ECF \ DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 20,2004 RECf=IVr', APPUCANT: Valley Medical Center PROJECT MANAGER: Susan Fiala ........ PROJECT TITLE: Valley Medical Center Expansion PLAN REVIEW: Mf 1"\ l. I l.UU4 SITE AREA: 1,055,589 square feet BUILDING AREA (gross): 348,150 squc ECONO~A\. DE'/O'.LUPM,,,., i re ffil.i;l.tNEI(lI"/ElORHOODS, , lo'a..1 LOCATION: 400 S 43,d Street I WORK ORDER NO: 77243 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Administrative Site Plan approval for the expansion of the Valley Medical Center including the enclosure of an existing courtyard, tenant improvements to three floors, a new patient drop-off area and the conversion of the heliport into a 63 stall surface parking 101. The mullt-parcel site is zoned Commercial Office wittl a P suffix (CO-P), The proposed work includes portions of three parcels which total 24 acres. Access would be remain as existing, from S. 43rd SI. and Talbot Rd. S. to internal roads. The project also includes the installation of landscaping, a pedestrian walkway and other necessary improvements. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Elemollt of the Probable Probablo More Element of tllo Prob,lblo Probable More Envlrollmollt Millor Major Informlltioll Environmollt Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necossary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earll1 Housinq Air Aeslhetics Waier LighllGlare Planls Recreation Lilncl/Shoreline Use Utilities Anirllals Transportation Environfllental/-tealtll Public Services Energy/ /-tistoric/Cultural Natuml Resources Preservation AirpM Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELA TED COMMENTS C. CODE·RELA TED COMMENTS We Ilave reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have experlise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. SignatLlre of Director or Authorized Representative Date CIt~ Department of Planning / Building /,.s ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:5uv-.face.hAlOS-leWcctif COMMENTS DUE: MAY 4, 2004 I APPLICATION NO: LUA-04-040, SA-A, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 20,2004 APPLICANT: Valle~Medical Center PROJECT MANAGER: Susan Fiala PROJECT TITLE: Valley Medical Center Expansion PLAN REVIEW: SITE AREA: 1,055,589 square feet BUILDING AREA (gross): 348,150 square feet LOCATION: 400 S 43rd Street I WORK ORDER NO: 77243 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Administrative Site Plan approval for the expansion of the Valley Medical Center including the enclosure of an existing courtyard, tenant improvements to three floors, a new patient drop-off area and the conversion of the heliport into a 63 stall surface parking lot. The multi-parcel site is zoned Commercial Office willl a P suffix (CO-P). The proposed work includes portions of three parcels which total 24 acres. Access would be remain as existing, from S. 43rd SI. and Talbot Rd. S. to internal roads. The project also includes the installation of landscaping, a pedestrian wall<way and other necessary improvements. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of tho Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Pro/J,1bte More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Ptants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportal/on Environmental Healtl) Public Services Energy/ Hisloric/Cultural Nalural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10.000 Feel 14.000 Feel B. POLICY-RELA TED COMMENTS CITY Of RENl'O~ tI'\. RECE1Vs;u APR 2\1 2004 BI:lILBltj€ 91V181g~1 C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and /Jave identified areas of probable impact or areas where addilio rmation is needed to properly assess this proposal. S-'/-o,/- Date Clt.n Department of Planning / Building /,.S ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET APPLICATION NO: LUA-04-040, SA-A, ECF APPLICANT: Valley Medical Center PROJECT TITLE: Valley Medical Center Expansion SITE AREA: 1,055,589 square feet LOCATION: 400 S 43rd Street CIT~o, COMMENTS DUE: MAY 4,2004 R E r.'f'iF.''vTO,', DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 20, 2004dLk I( c: U PROJECT MANAGER: Susan Fiala ',:./ .J+ PLAN REVIEW: IjU/LDING DIVJ~II"\ .... ,. BUILDING AREA (gross): 348,150 square feet I WORK ORDER NO: 77243 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Administrative Site Plan approval for the expansion of the Valley Medical Center Including the enclosure of an existing courtyard, tenant improvements to three floors, a new patient drop-off area and the conversion of the heliport into a 63 stall surface parking lot. The multi-parcel site is zoned Commercial Office willl a P suffix (CO-P). The proposed work includes portions of three parcels which total 24 acres. Access would be remain as existing, from S. 43rd SI. and Talbot Rd. S. to internal roads. The project also includes the installation of landscaping, a pedestrian walkway and other necessary improvements. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Elomrmt of tI,e Probable Probable Environment Minor Major Impacts Impacts Earth Air Water Plants Land/Shoreline Use Animals Environmental Healtll Energy/ Natwal Resources B. POLlCY·RELATED COMMENTS REceif\ieo APR 2l J 20~ BUILDING OJ VISION C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS More Information Necessary Element of Ihe Probable Probab/o More Environmont Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Housing Aesthetics LiqhllGtare Recreation Utilities Transportation Public Services Historic/Cul/urat Preservation Airport Environment 10.000 Feet 14.000 Feel We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where addilio information is needed to properly assess this proposal. CIt~n Department of Planning / Building / ~s ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET r.-REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: APPLICATION NO: LUA-04-040, SA-A, ECF APPLICANT: Valle Medical Center PROJECT TITLE: Valle Medical Center Ex ansion SITE AREA: 1,055,589 s uare feet LOCATION: 400 S 43'd Street COMMENTS DUE: MAY 4, 2004 DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 20, 2004 PROJECT MANAGER: Susan Fiala PLAN REVIEW: OEVEl -T ces CITY OF RENTON SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Administrative Site Plan approval for the expansion of the Valley Medical Center including the enclosure of an existing courtyard, tenant improvements to three floors, a new patient drop-off area and the conversion of the heliport into a 63 stall surface parking lot. The multi-parcel site is zoned Commercial Office will, a P suffix (CO-P). The proposed work includes portions of three parcels which total 24 acres. Access would be remain as existing, from S. 43rd SI. and Talbot Rd. S. to internal roads. The project also includes the installation of landscaping, a pedestrian walkway and other necessary improvements. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More E/emont of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Eart/] Housing Air Aestl1etics Water LigllVGlare Plants Recreation Lllnd/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmentat Heal/h Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natluat Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feel 14,000 Feel B, POLICY-RELA TED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS We ilave reviewed tilis application witil particular attention to those areas in wilich we have expertise and ilave identified areas of probable impact or areas wllere addition . rmation is needed to properly assess this proposal. , -- CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM Date: May 4, 2004 To: Susan Fiala From: Mike Dotson~ Subject: Valley Medical Center Expansion; LUA-04-040, ECF, SA-H I have reviewed the subject Environmental and Development application. Based on the information supplied with the application, the following comments concern the environmental impacts, policy, and other code-related issues: EXisting Conditions: WATER SEWER STORM STREETS There is an existing 12" water main looping the existing facilities. The modeled fire flow available at the site is approximately 4600 gpm. The proposed project is located within the 350-water pressure zone. The site is outside the Aquifer Protection Area. The property is currently served by an 8" public sewer line. The site is served by on-site private surface water collection and conveyance facilities. Collected surface water is discharged to the Panther Creek wetlands. The site is surrounded by fully improved roadway with curb, gutter, sidewalk and street lighting. Existing site ingress and egress is adequate. Code Related Comments: WATER 1. Our records indicate that the Water System Development fees and Special Assessment District fees have been paid-in-full. 2. Any existing sub-standard fire hydrants will be required to be replaced and/or retrofitted with a quick disconnect Storz fitting. 3. Separate plans and permits are necessary for any new fire sprinkler systems and associated double detector check valve assemblies. SEWER 1. Our records indicate that the Sewer System Development fees and Special Assessment District fees have been paid-in-full. H:IDivision,sIDovalop,8arlDov&plan,ingIPROJECTSI04·040,SusanlValiay mad canter green folder· plan reviaw.doc » --SURFACE WATER 1. A Surface Water System Development Charge (SDC) is required for this site. This fee is calculated on the new impervious surfaces added to the site. Based on the submitted information, the SDC fee for this development will be $4,852.26. 2. New development of the site requires storm and surface water drainage improvements in accordance with the King County 1990 Surface Water Design Standards. The Technical Information Report, submitted with this application, provided an analysis that covered the core submittal requirements. STREETSITRANSPORTATION 1. The application states that no new trips will be generated with this project. Therefore a Traffic Impact Analysis is not required. PLAN REVIEW -GENERAL 1. All plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. 2. A construction permit is required. Please submit three copies of the drawings, two copies of the drainage report, a construction estimate, application form, and appropriate fees to the sixth floor customer service counter. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS 1. Prior to any construction activities on the site, Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control (TESC) shall be installed in accordance with the Department of Ecology Erosion Control requirements, and to the satisfaction of the Development Services Division representative. H:IDivision.sIDevelop.serlDov&plan.ingIPROJECTSI04-040.SusanlValley mad cenler grean folder -plan review. doc f -". -', CIt_n Depal1menl of Planning / Building / ~s ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS DUE: APPLICATION NO: LUA-04-040, SA-A, ECF DATE CIRCULATE APPLICANT: Valle Medical Center PROJECT MANAG PROJECT TITLE: Valle Medical Center Ex ansion PLAN REVIEW: SITE AREA: 1,055,589 s uare feet LOCATION: 400 S 43rd Street SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Administrative Site Plan approval for the expansion of the Valley Medical Center including the enclosure of an existing courtyard, tenant improvements to three floors, a new patient drop-off area and the conversion of the heliport into a 63 stall surface parking 101. The multi-parcel site is zoned Commercial Office with a P suffix (CO-P). The proposed work includes portions of three parcels which total 24 acres. Access would be remain as existing, from S. 43rd SI. and Talbot Rd. S. to internal roads. The project also includes the installation of landscaping, a pedestrian walkway and other necessary improvements. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Eloment of tho Probable Probablo More Eloment of tilO Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environmont Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Eartll Housinn Air Aesthetics Waler LighllGlare Plants Recreation Land/Shoroline Use Utilities Animals Transportalion Environmenlal Heal//] Public Services Energy/ Historic/CuI/ural Nalural Resources Preservalion Airport Environment 10.000 Feel 14,000 Feet B. POLlCY·RELA TED COMMENTS C. CODE·RELA TED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. e/W~~U?1~ Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: -CITY OF RENTON - FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU MEMORANDUM April 22, 2004 Susan Fiala, Senior Planner Corey Thomas, Plans Review Inspector Site plan comments for Valley Medical Center Expansion Environmental Impact Comments: 1. Fire mitigation fees are required at the rate of $0.52 per additional square foot added. This fee is paid at time of building permit issuance. Added area is 20,000 square feet so mitigation fee is $10,400. Code-Related Comments: 1. The fire flow requirements remain unchanged. The existing looped water mains and fire hydrants are adequate for the proposed project. 2. The fire sprinkler system shall be extended throughout the addition. 3. The fire alarm system shall be extended throughout the addition. 4. Fire department access as proposed is adequate. Strongly recommend signage and a physical barrier, like an overhead cross-bar, to limit access of over-size vehicles to the patient load/unload area. CT:ct vmcexp2 Cit_n Department of Planning / Building / ~s ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ~ COMMENTS DUE: MAY 4, 2004 APPLICATION NO: DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 20, 2004 APPLICANT: Valle Medical Center PROJECT MANAGER: Susan Fiala PROJECT TITLE: Valle Medical Center Ex ansion PLAN REVIEW: SITE AREA: 1,055,589 s uare feet LOCATION: 400 S 43'd Street SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental {SEPAl Review and Administrative Site Plan approval for the expansion of the Valley Medical Center including the enclosure of an existing courtyard, tenant improvements to three floors, a new patient drop-off area and the conversion of the heliport into a 63 stall surface parking lot. The multi-parcel site is zoned Commercial Office with a P suffix {CO-Pl. The proposed work includes portions of three parcels which total 24 acres. Access would be remain as existing, from S. 43rd SI. and Talbot Rd. S. to internal roads. The project also includes the installation of landscaping, a pedestrian walkway and other necessary improvements. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probablo More Envlrollment Mlllor Major Information Environment Millor Major Informlllion Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Ear/ll /-IolJsinQ Air Aestl1elics Waler LigIJtlGlare Planls Recreation Land/SllOroline Use Utilities Animals Transportation EnvirofJmental/-leal/lJ Public Services Energy/ /-listoric/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feel 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELA TED COMMENTS C, CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS We have reviewed Illis application with particular attention 10 those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impacl or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date / PROI'ER~ES FEE REVIEW 112004-¥ DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET '~ ENVIRONMENT AL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET o o PLAN REVIEW ROUTING SLIP ~~~:S!::~C<LQ W. ~~EN~_=t_Z_4_3 ___ (date) APPUCANT: ~~m~ ~ O~:-~EIVED FROM o SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AND CONNECTI N FEES APPLIED NEED MORE INFORMATION: 0 LEGAIJ DESCRIPTION ~ SPECIAL ASSF-SSMENTS AND CONNECTION FEF-S FSfIMATED 0 SQUARE FOOTAGE 0 VICINITY MAP o NOT APPROVED FOR APPLICATION OF FEES 0 FRONT FOOTAGE 0 OTIIER o VF..sTED 0 NOT VF-STED o This fee review supersedes and cancels fee review # dated __ --::---=-:-=:::-:::-= 8 0 PARENT PID# (snbject to changeL SUlUECT PROPERTY PID# _7),5707 -01 00') -00) 0) -tl:)30 0 King Co. Tax Acct# (new) _______ _ It is the intent of this development fee analysis to put the developer/owner on notice, tlmt the fees quoted below may be applicable to the su~ject site upon development of the property. All quoted fees are potential charges that may be due and payable at the time the construction permit is issued to install the on-site and off-site improvements (i.e. underground utilities, street improvements, etc.) Triggering mechanisms for the SOC fees will be based on current City ordinances and determined by the applicable Utility Section. Please note that these fees are subject to change witllOut notice. Final fees will be based on rates in effect at time of Building Permit/Construction Permit application. The following quoted fees do NOT include inspection fees, side sewer permits, r/w permit fees or the cost of water meters. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PARCEL METHOD OF ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS NO. NO. ASSESSMENT UNITS OR FEE Latecomer Allreement (pvt) WATER Latecomer Agreement (pvt) W ASTEW A TER Latecomer Aereement (pvt)OTHER BI.{-O Co t'J":>c::::o ."'" Specilll Assessment DistrictlW ATER Special Assessment District/W ASTEW ATER .roint Use Agreement (METRO) Local Improvement District '1. 2-0 X ,-. --'I' (Xa;. (Il Truffic 8enefit Zones $75.00 PER TRIP, CALCULATED UY TRANSPORTATION FUTURE OBLIGATIONS (liTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE -WATER # OF UNITSI SDC FEE I'd Prev. 0 Partially Pd (Ltd Exemption) 0 Never Pd SQ. FTG. Single family residential $1,525/I1nit x Mobile home dweJling unit $1220/unit in parI, Apartment, Condo $915/unit not in CD or COR zones x Commercial/Industrial, $0.213/sq. ft. of property (not less than $1525.00) X Hoeing. hy Special Agreement/Footprint of nldg pillS 15 ft perimeter (1,800 GPM threshotd) SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE -WASTEWATER ~; "d Prev. 0 Partially I'd (Ltd Exemption) 0 Never Pd S1ngle family residential dwelling unit $900/unit x Mobile home dwelling unit $720/unit x Apartment, Condo $540/unit lIot in CD or COR zones x Cornmercial/J ndllstrial, $0.126/sq. ft. of property (not less than $900.00) X . REDEVELOPMENT CREDIT: (New -Old Flow)/New Flow X Above Fees SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE -SURFACE);[TER o Pd Prevo 0 Partially I'd (Ltd Exemption) Never Pd Single family residential and mohile home dwelJjn~ uOit $715/unit x All other properties $0.249/s<) ft of new impervious area of property x 1 q \ L-\ g-=t 4) gS2.,2(P (not less tJlllll $715.00) ~ ~V!ru I! W . I PRELIMINARYTOTA1~ $~~~'2. 2( n J '< f\.) si ,,",~!?I.;~,.;,y ,!aJL . §/41.fft III 0 III 0 11 "" *11' SII lieet' roperty is within an LID, it is developer's responsihility to check with the Finance Dept. for paid/un-paid status. 11 I III HThe sqllare footage figures used arc taken from the King COlllllY Assessor's map and arc approximate only. <: ~ .... III .: ;l EFFECTIVE January I, 211114 0 ~ -::: City of Remon Department of Planning / Building / Public \l\tuIKS ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEWe§HEET " REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ~CLrk~~ COMMENTS DUE: MAY 4, 2004 !?:() ):::0 ... U :?--Jr~ ;.:-J " ::0 2 C' (') APPLICATION NO: LUA-04-040, SA-A, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 20, 2004 ::j .:;:. '''' ""<-l:\:) .'! 1 APPLICANT: Valley Medical Center PROJECT MANAGER: Susan Fiala (r) i" I. I'-) PROJECT TITLE: Valley Medical Center Expansion PLAN REVIEW: :TJ • C> "~, <t" = .. 1 ()z .:::.. SITE AREA: 1,055,589 square feet BUILDING AREA (gross): 348,150 square feet (TI 0 LOCATION: 400 S 43rd Street I WORK ORDER NO: 77243 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Administrative Site Plan approval for the expansion of the Valley Medical Center including the enclosure of an existing courtyard, tenant improvements to three floors, a new patient drop-off area and the conversion of the heliport Into a 63 stall surface parking lot. The multi-parcel site is zoned Commercial Office with a P suffix (CO-P). The proposed work includes portions of three parcels which total 24 acres. Access would be remain as existing, from S. 43rcl SI. and Talbot Rd. S. to internal roads, The project also includes the installation of landscaping, a pedestrian walkway and 01l1er necessary improvements. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Elemonl of tile Probablo Probablo More Element of I/le Probable Probablo More Envlronmont Minor MIIJor Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necossary Impacts Imp,lcts Nocessary Earlh Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Planls Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Healtil Public Services Ellorgy/ Hisloric/Cultural Naturat Resources Preservalion Airport Environment 10,000 Feel t4.000 Feel C. CODE·RELA TED COMMENTS t-.. / -. City of Remon Department of Planning / Building / Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS DUE: MAY 4, 2004 APPLICATION NO: LUA-04-040, SA-A, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 20,2004 APPLICANT: Valle Medical Center PROJECT MANAGER: Susan Fiala PROJECT TITLE: Valle Medical Center Ex ansion PLAN REVIEW: SITE AREA: 1,055,589 s uare feet LOCATION: 400 S 43rd Street SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Administrative Site Plan approval for the i~ expansion of the Valley Medical Center including the enclosure of an existing courtyard, tenant improvements to three floors, a new patient drop-off area and the conversion of the heliport Into a 63 stall surface parking lot. The multi-parcel site is zoned Commercial Office with a P suffix (CO-P). The proposed work includes portions of three parcels which total 24 acres. Access would be remain as existing, from S. 43rd St. and Talbot Rd. S. to internal roads. The project also includes the installation of landscaping, a pedestrian walkway and other necessary improvements. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g, Non·Code) COMMENTS Element of tile Probable Probable More Element of tile Probilbte Probable More Environment Minor Major Informlltlon Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessilry Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth /1ousing Air Aestlletics Water LifJlltIGlare Plants Recreation Land/Slloreline Use Utililies Animals Transportation Environmenta//1ealtll Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLlCY·RELA TED COMMENTS efTY OF ReNTON RECEIVED APR 2,1 2004 8UlLOlNG OJVI~ON C. CODE·RELA TED COMMENTS We lJave reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in wllich we have expertise and have identified areas of probable itl]pact or """ wh,,, ,dd;t;on,llnl"m,tion i, n"dod to r:oz;"" Ihl' propo"l. :'5/ ::s /:> ';t -:-, Sigoo'"" of o;"ct" " A""""", R,p"""""" Dol, ~. . •~~ tilrl " ..u. -PlanningIBuildingIPubl ic Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator Knthy Keolker-Wheeler. Mayor April 20, 2004 James R. Hobbs NBBJ 111 South Jackson Street Seattle, WA 98104 Subject: Valley Medical Center Expansion Project LUA-04-040, SA-A, ECF Dear Mr. Hobbs: The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on May 18. 2004. Prior tothat review, ,you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. Please contact me at (425) 430-7382 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Susan Fiala Senior Planner cc: Valley Medical Center fOwner -------------IO-S-S-So-u-tl-1G--ra-dy-W--ay-.-R-e-n-to-n,-W-&-s-hi-n-gt-on--9-S0-S-S------------~ ® This peper contains 50% rocyclod material, 30% post consumer ABEAI1 OF THE CURVE NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON.SIGNIFICANCE·MITIGATED (DNS·M) DATE: April 20. 2004 LAND USE NUMBER: LUAO'·O'O, SA.A, ECF PROJECT NAME: Vl1l1oy Modlcal Cantor ElCpllnalon PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Ttw uPl'llcanl Is requostlng Environmental (SEPA) Review Bnd AdminislrDINIi Sho Plan appro .... ol lor the oxpanslon 01 ,tho Valloy Medical Conlor Including 1110 onctofH~te of, nn existing courtyard, Itmonl improl,lllmoilia to \l1(ctU lIoon, 0 now potlunl tlrop-oH aron and tho convoraion 01 tll0 hollporllnto D 63 Iiall Burtaetl parking 101. Tho !llutll'pnrcel silo I. zoned Commercial Otflce with a P aufflK (CO·P). Tho proposed work includes portions of tt'H,e parcnls whlr:h lotfl' 24 aCrOtL Accoss wOllld he romaln DB O(18Iing, hom S. 4:ird st. and Talbat Rd. S. to Intornal rood~. TIII1 prot0ct ohm inc\uCllJ8 IflO Installation 01 landticoplflll, El PtHioSlrlan wulkwuy und other necossary hnpro .... emontft. PROJECT LOCATION: 400 5 4:!'~ Stroel OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON·SIGNIFICANCE, MITIGATEO (DNS·Ml: As Ino Umel Agttncy, the Clly of Renton has d elormined I Mt B Ignlficant e nvironmanlBI Impacls a '0 unlikely In f tlS\11t I rOll1lllft p ropo8ud n roj!)c!. T huretoro, liS l)ormitlBt1lJnder tile RCW '13.~ IC.110, Ihe elly of Renton is using 1110 OpUonul DNS·M pfocess 10 {Jive [lolico IMl u DtlS- M Is IIKeli 10 1)0 iS5uod. COlnmunt poriolj:o lelr thu project and 1110 propolioLl ONS·M Bre IIlteoral8d Inlo II singlo comment period. TI18ro will bU no commBnl p oril)111 ollowlnu the i SSllonC6 011110 TtlresflQtd D olernlinalion 0 f N on-SigrllllcllfICU- MlIIg6to{j (DNS·M). A 14·My appeal POIIOi1 ''''llllollo'N ttlO IsslJonce of the ON S·M. peRMIT APPLICATION DATE: April 2, 2004 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: APPLICANT/PROJECT CONTACT PERSON: Jam.s R. Hobbs Tol: (206) 223·5166 Ponnltl(Rovlow RoquolSted: Erwlronmenlol (SEPAl Rovitlw, Silo PIAl) Approval Other Parmltl which mey bo required: NIA Roquelted Studiol: Ouotoc:hnictll Repon. Dralnoge Technlc:olinformlllion Report Location whoro nppllcatlon may bo rovlowotl: Planning/Bulldlng/Public Workl Dopartmont, Dovolopment Servlcos Olvilion. Sixth Floor Renton City Hall, 101'16 Soulh Grady Way, Ronlon. VIA 98095 CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: ZonlnglLanrl UIU: Envlronmonlnl Ooeumontl Ihal Evaluate tho Propoeed Projoct: Oovolopmont Regulationl Usod For ProJoct Mitigation; PI~)JOCI Sllu is daslglloled Cenlor InstitutIOn on Ibtt COl11prohOflsh'O Pion Lalld UStl Mnp nnu zonBIl Commercml Ofhce With a ~P" SlJffill (CO.P). ThO proposlJd !lOlipilfll d~flanlilon ond associatod r.urtocu pal king till appuat to c()mpl~' With triO opplicublu COop zoninu ond dovolopmllnl Slolidurds. GOOlocnnic:al Repon, Drainage Roport nnd SEPA cnecKliul. Tho proposal 10 lull/oel to 1110 CUy'& Envlronmontal (SEPA) Review Ordlnancfj, Zoning Code, Subdivision Rogulatlona. Land Clearing and Troo CuttinO Rogulatlons. Public Workl Standards, Uniform Building Coda, Uniform Flro Code, and Othor nppllcoblo bUilding end conBlruclion standards, Proposod Mitlgl\tlon Moaluros: Tho following MItigation MOlilure8 Will likely be Imposed on tho proposed ptojttCI. Those recommonded Mitigation M088ures addross projoct impacts nol CQvtHt.\d by Qxloting codoa and regulations as citad tlbovo. FIre MII/gation Foo: equiva/ont to SO.52 por grrus squant fOOl of flOW commercial buildIng l1fOU; und Traffic MItIQ,,'}ol1 Fee: oqu(valent to 175,QO per eocl/IlOw lJvoroga woekday trip tlltribulaLJ/e to fllo proposal. Commentl on Ihe obovo DppllcatJon mUll be lubmlttod In writing 10 SUlan Fiala, Sonlor Plonnor, Dovolapmont Sorvlco. Dlvl,lon, 1055 South Grady Way, Rontan, WA 98055, by 6:00 PM on May 4, 2004. If you hav~ qutl!i\U)f)S ElDout this proposal, or wish 10 be mada 0 party of record ano rec8ivo additional notification oy mall, conlElcl thl.! Project Marlo.ger. Anyone WnQ submits Wlttlerl commenl!; will alltom8l1cllli~ nooomo B pony 01 raeard alld Will be notified 01 ony docislon on Ihit; proJec\. CONTACT PERSON: Susan Flolo 101: (4251430·7382 PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION If you would like 10 be made a party of record to receivo furl her Information on this proposed projoct, completo 1111. lonn and reiurn 10: City 01 Renlon, Davelopmenl Planning, 1055 So. Grady Way, Renlon, WA 98055. Fila No.lName: LUA04·040, SA·A, ECF NAME: _______________________ ~~--------__ ADDRESS: ______________________ _ TELEPHONE NO.: _________ _ CERTIFICATION -_______ u ___ * .. ~.::;~;~K4:\~~'ltl ~-~" ......... (.;it.. " I, 3V51?¥ &/q . hereby certify that -.3 above document were posted by me in 3 conspicuous the described property on 1,Iz.1j2.tP).{ j' ,,:~SS'ON ~~':~'" ... '.~. "-.0', ~ ~ : /cr ~OTAb~'" ~ : :0" ryy~, ~ , . (/)~ ~ '-. ~.-. " ,\>1ij\6~ Ofd08L\C .: 1 place~,~ 'Qr nearby. /:~; , 'Jl ",~·29·0'1 .• ' G' .: ", ,.a: ...... ~ .. ,~ .. -- 't •• , ,. WASt,(i. .......... ... '\\\\\\\" ... ... Signed: -I-44~1::Wii--£LJ.~~~~-Z ATTEST: Subscribed ~n~e me, a Notary Public, in and for the Washington residing i~ ,on the ,.:ji:1h. day of __ ..!:.-.Ll..&dl.a,::,I-J::::::a!l~~_ MARILYN KAMCHEFF MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES 6-29.07 NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON·SIGNIFICANCE·MITIGATED (DNS-M) DATE: April 20, 2004 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA04-040, SA-A, ECF PROJECT NAME: Valley Medical Center Expansion PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Administrative Site Plan approval for tile expansion of the Valley Medical Center Including tile enclosure of an existing courtyard, tenant improvements to three floors, a new patient drop-off area and the conversion of the heliport into a 63 stall surface parking lot. The multi-parcel site is zoned Commercial Office with a P suffix (CO-P). The proposed work includes portions of three parcels Wllich total 24 acres. Access would be remain as existing, from S. 43rd St. and Talbot Rd. S. to internal roads. Tile project also includes the installation of landscaping, a pedestrian walkway and other necessary improvements. PROJECT LOCATION: 400 S 43,d Street OPTIONAL DETERMtNATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE, MITIGATED (DNS-M); As the Lead Agency, the City of Renton Ilas determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely tor esult from the proposed project. Therefore, as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110, the Cily of Renton is using the Optional DNS-M process to give nolice that a DNS- M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance oft he Threshold Determination of N on-Significance- Mitigated (DNS-M). A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: April 2, 2004 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: April 20, 2004 APPLICANT/PROJECT CONTACT PERSON: James R. Hobbs Tel: (206) 223-5188 Permits/Review Requested: Other Permits which may be required: Requested Studies: Location where application may be reviewed: CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Zoning/Land Use: Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Development Regulations Used For Project MItigation: Environmental (SEPA) Review, Site Plan Approval N/A Geotechnical Report, Drainage Technical Information Report Planning/Building/Public Works Department, Development Services Division, Sixth Floor Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055 Project site is designated Center Institution on tile Comprellensive Plan Land Use Map and zoned Commercial Office with a "P" suffix (CO-P), The proposed hospital expansion and associated surface parking lot appear to comply with the applicable COop zoning and development standards. Geotecllnlcal Report, Drainage Report and SEPA checklist. The proposal is subject to Ihe Cily's Environmental (SEPA) Review Ordinance, Zoning Code, Subdivision Regulations, Land Clearing and Tree Cutting Regulations, Public Works Standards, Uniform Building Code, Uniform Fire Code, and other applicable building and construction standards. Proposed Mitigation Measures: The following Mitigation Measures will likely be imposed on the proposed project. These recommended Mitigation Measures address project impacts not covered by existing codes and regulations as cited above. Fire Mitigation Fee: equivalent to $0.52 per gross square foot of new commercial building area; and Traffic Mitigation Fee: equivalent to $75. 00 per each new average weekday trip attributable to tile proposal. Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Susan Fiala, Senior Planner, Development Services Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055, by 5:00 PM on May 4, 2004. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact the Project Manager. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any ·decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: Susan Fiala tel: (425) 430-7382 PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION -----i! I I I! I ' u ..... I" SCAUl '".100' I I (.-1) -, '. -1!I.X'~ifir;r_-:: .. _" .... , (It ... ) (CO) (CO) ! -( ('-') Ji ~ 1--_(·_-")_..L.il,~'>I_: L If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project, complete this form and return to: City of Renton, Development Planning, 1055 So. Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. File No.lName: LUA04-040, SA-A, ECF NAME: _____________________________________________ ___ ADDRESS: _________________________________________ ___ TELEPHONE NO.: _________ __ City of Renton LAND USE PERMIT MASTER APPLICATION PROPERTY OWNER(S) PROJECT INFORMATION NAME: Valley Medical Center PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: Valley Medical Center Expansion Project ADDRESS: 400 South 43rd Street PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION AND ZIP CODE: 400 South 43rd Street, Renton, WA 98055 CITY: Renton, WA ZIP: 98055 KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): TELEPHONE NUMBER: (425) 228-3440 8857670100 (Entire Site) 8857670010 (Hospital) 8857670030 (Heliport) APPLICANT (if other than owner) EXISTING LAND USE(S): Hospital NAME: PROPOSED LAND USE(S): N/A COMPANY (if applicable): EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: ADDRESS: Center Institution PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION CITY: ZIP: (if applicable): NlA TELEPHONE NUMBER EXISTING ZONING: CO (P) CONTACT PERSON PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): N/A SITE AREA (in square feet): 1,055,589 NAME: James R. Hobbs SQUARE FOOTAGE OF ROADWAYS TO BE DEDICATED FOR SUBDIVISIONS OR PRIVATE STREETS SERVING COMPANY (if applicable): NBBJ THREE LOTS OR MORE (if applicable): NlA ADDRESS: 111 South Jackson Street PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET ACRE (If applicable): N/A CITY: Seattle, WA ZIP: NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable): N/A 98104 TELEPHONE NUMBER AND E-MAIL ADDRESS: (206) 223-5188 c RE AP , "y OF RI=I\JT". ~~M~QF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): N/A ) 0 2 Inn4 UILDING DIVISION 1:\24KK2_(KI124K82_4h\A'lmin\Ci!y_"I~Renton\L.llnd Use Pcrrni! MaSicr ApplicUlion IIJ I6IM.doc '/ .' PROJ~~TINFORMAT~I~O~N~.~~c~o~nt~in~u~e~~L'I ______________ ~ NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): PROJECT VALUE: $35,000,000 N/A SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (If applicable): NlA IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): N/A SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): New Hospital 23,600 SF SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): 348,150 SF NET FLOOR AREA OF NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): Existing & New 248,000 SF NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW PROJECT (if applicable): None IJ AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA ONE IJ AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA TWO IJ FLOOD HAZARD AREA IJ GEOLOGIC HAZARD IJ HABITAT CONSERVATION IJ SHORELINE STREAMS AND LAKES IJ WETLANDS LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY ___ sq. ft. ___ sq. ft. ___ sq. ft. ___ sq. ft. ___ sq.ft. (Attach legal description on separate sheet with the following Information Included) SITUATE IN THE QUARTER OF SECTION _, TOWNSHIP _, RANGE_, IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. See Attached TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES List all land use applications being applied for: 1. Environmental (SEPAl 500,00 4. 2. Administrative Site Plan} L@'dO 5. Staff will calculate applicable fees and postage: $ /fl.5g AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I, (P~ ~ i 11l./ .. .( U,~ •• .Ii .... .., , .oda", Ihall "" (pl ... a """'" ona) _ Iha ,""ani owna, of Iha ,,",party involve n hi P1jeatl cfr n&a the authorized representative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authOrization) and that the foregoing statem n an an er e ein co tained and the Information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief . . V V (V ~ .-... --..~. 11 £,~ J \ I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that 1( \ dna fI: ,...Ire a..Y'\ (Signattlf6Oj Ownerl~e Yes . ---signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the Va I r ~ Hew (:t:-( (f#1.f(.r C /EO uses and purposes mentioned in the Instrument. )"-' " H Notary (Print) ___________ _ My appointment expires: /¢~i 1:1248H2_IKlI24882_ 46\AdlllinICi'y_oCllenlOnll.and Use Perrnil MII"er Applicalion 113 I (,o.l.doc LIST OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 300-FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 PROJECT NAME: y,Att'8r~,eoICAL~ ~~/aI~ APPLICATION NO: __ -__ --------------------- The following is a list qf property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. The Development Services Division will notify the$e individuals of the proposed development NAME ADDRESS Q:\ WEB\PW\DEVSER V\Fonns\Planning\owners.doc08129/03 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER CITY OF RENTON RECEIVED APR 0 2 2004 BUILDING DIVISION (Attach additional sheets, If necessary) NAME ADDRESS Applicant Certification ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER I, \..lAtAP~ !!-. ~fL5 , hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property (Print Name) owners and their addresses were obtained from: Title Company Records King County Assessors Records pate 4· /. 0 tf NOTARY A nESTED: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, In and for the Stat of Washlngt0!l.!..-l. residing at on the --'-day of .... ~, '" , 2~ . ...... -----fo-<.."(.···:· .. ···~~ "-Signed .............;' (j /~e:,S\ON ~" 01-I, "c;.;.~ ~'. " ". ~ , I. : u CJl : -For City of Renton Use-" .... :~ 1 ,,1~····/-24~()~.···~ .f CERTIFICATION OF MAILING I,,~ oF·;'i.;~~': I, 8\tl~\w:.ber ,hereby certify Ihat notices of Ihe proposed apPlica~'o'n~~~,\" E I ) 21Jk-... "" ~KAMI'\ III mp oyee ~ ., ~-~~., •••••••••• \,~ " each list:g;ed roperty owner on ~?-V . f ... ~'O&'ON ~.t"'~\ Jill '" .. ~ ~'. 01\ ~ . /lIT] :0 ~OTA~J.-~\ ~ Signed ~ _ _ Date: : U (fl: ~ /' . . ~ ., ~ ~ C : # NOTARY \ ~ """ Ual' ./~ j ',,;,~ ... ~:?~:~J ..... <§-i' A TT~T: Subscribed and sworn before ~ Notary Public, In and for the Stat~IG\~~Slding at(ne<4~ on the ~ day of J~' ,l~~"""'''' MARILYN CHEFF MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES R.:>Q.n7 Q:\WEB\PW\DEVSERV\Forms\P DMing'iowners.doc 2 ~ ,BATCH NUMBER ~ CUSTOMER NAME ., CT NBBU COMMENTS tJ'¥ ~.~V: ~~' l}.f,~: ~ ~~.~ t~ ~.~,~ n' ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~n' ~~.~.~ ~.~t~ c' ";. t ~ ~ t~~f.~:~tr.t"~,"~".~t~t"t~~~~~~~1!'!"~~"~t~"'~1·'~ 302305-9034-03 302305-9034-03 VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER 420757 VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER 420751 3901 TALBOT RD SOUTH 3901 TALBOT RD SOUTH RENTON WA 98058 RENTON WA 98058 302305-9054-08 SEAFIRST BANK / REIS WARD #6298162 PO BOX 34029 SEATTLE WA 302305-9065-05 CITY OF RENTON 1055 S GRADY WAY RENTON WA 302305-9082-04 KEG RESTAURANTS LTD #150 -10160 SHELLBRIOGE RICHMOND BC V6X 3H1 CAN 302305-9085-01 YOUNKER R 1410 102ND AVE NE BELLEVUE WA 302305-9092-02 CHURCH EUGENE T+PENNV R 3820 E VALLEY HWY S RENTON WA 302305-9109-03 FRARY LYNN R MO 3764 SW 111ST SEATTLE WA 302305-911 O~OO OBRIEN DANIEL N DR 10127 SE 16TH PL BELLEVUE WA 302305-9111-09 SPRINGBROOK ASSOCIATES C/O DENNIS KINCH POBOX 978 MERCER ISLAND WA 312305-902.5-03 Zll L L C 13510 SE 50TH PL BELLEVUE LolA 770303 98124 110965 98055 200871 WAY 302468 98005 629999 98055 329999 98166 612502 98004 912812 98040 859999 98006 302305-9054-08 SEAFIRST BANK / REIS WARO#6298162 PO BOX 34029 SEATTLE WA 302305-9065-05 CITY OF RENTON 1055 S GRADY WAY RENTON WA 302305-9082-04 KEG RESTAURANTS LTD #150 -10760 SHELLBRIDGE RICHMOND BC V6X 3H1 CAN 302305-9085-01 YOUNKER R 1410 102ND AVE NE BELLEVUE WA 302305-9092-:-02 CHURCH·EUGENE T+PENNY 3820 E VALLEY HWY S RENTON WA 302305-9109-03 FRARY LYNN R MD 3164 SW171ST SEATTLE WA' 302305-9110-00 OBRIEN DANIEL N OR 10121 SE 16TH PL BELLEVUE WA 302305-9111-09 SPRINGBROOK ,ASSOCIATES C/O DENNIS KINCH POBOX 978 MERCER ISLAND WA 312305-9025-03 III L L C 13510 SE 50TH PL BELLEVUE WA R. 770303 98124 110965. 96055 200811 WAY 302468 98005 629999 98055 329999 98166 612502 9B004 912812 98040 859999 98006 312305-9040-04 . lYNN ELIZABETH TRUST ~198 C/O JSH PROPERTIES '14900 INTERURBAN AVE S #210 SEATTLE WA 98168 312305-9092-01 PARK TOWER ASSOCIATES l.l 149999 POBOX 3407 BELLEVUE WA 98009 312305-9102-09 UNITED WAY GOOD NEIGHBOR CT141411 ATT COOK 0 -UNITED WAY KC 107 CHERRY ST SEATTLE WA 98104 312305-9103-08 SNOW LAWRENCE W OR 409999 17910 TALBOT RO S RENTON WA 98055 312305-9134-01 RENTON VAllEY ASSOC C/O HUEY JEFF 5626 E MERCER WAY MERCER ISlANO WA 312305-9135-00 110384 98040 VALLEY MEDICAL ASSOCIATES 1099999 11930 TALBOT RD S RENTON WA 98055 312305-9152-08 RADOVICH JOHN C LLC 311173 2835 82NO AVE SE #300 MERCER ISLAND WA 98040 7616BO-0010-02 PUBL HOSP OIST#1 KING CO 342249 VALLEY MEO ATTN FINANCE POBOX 50010 RENTON WA 98058 761680-0030-08 R2R INVESTMENTS llC 349999 1979 S l80TH ST KENT WA 98032 :n l3U~-'IUltU-U4 LYNN ELIlA8ET~ '~UST 005198 C/O JSH PROPER •• ES 14900 INTERURBAN AVE S #210 SEATTLE WA 98168 312305-9092-01 PARK TOWER ASSOCIATES L.L 149999 P 0 SOX 3401 BELLEVUE WA 98009 312305-9102-09 UNITED WAY GOOD NEIGHBOR CTl41471 ATT COOK 0 -UNITED WAY KC 107 CHERRY ST SEATTLE WA 98104 312305-9103 .... 08 SNOW LAWRENCE W DR 409999 17910 TALBOT RD S RENTON WA 98055 312305-9134-01 RENTON VALLEY ASSOC C/O HUEY JEFF 5626 E MERCER WAY HERCER ISLANO WA 312305-9135-00 110384 98040 VALLEY MEDICAL ASSOCIATES 1099999 17930.TALBOT RD S RENTON'WAI 98055 312305-9152-:-08 RADOVICH JOHN C LLC 371173 2835 82NO AVE SE #300 MERCER ISLAND WA 98040 761680-0010-02 PUBL HOSPOIST#1KING CO 342249 VALLEY MEO ATTN FINANCE P O.BOX 50010 RENTON WA 98058. 761680-0030-08 R2R: INVESTMENTS LtC 349999 7919 S 180TH ST KENT WA 98032 761680-0070-09 LOMBARDINI VICTORIA 10113 UPR PRESTON RO SE ISSAQUAH WA 761680-0060-07 3N1761 98027 VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER CREDI3D9999 3915 TALBOT RD #211 RENTON WA 98055 761680-0090-05 ANDE8RHAN BEYENE+WAINNIE AS069999 9613 S 177TH ST RENTON WA 98055 161680-0100-03 Re.:l-w'n~d -Uno.ble.~ CHINN DEAN HARK dd,l/U" 012971 9625 S l77TH sT'1I'l.3to--t RENTON WA 98055 761680-0120-09 BRINGHURST EDWARD 9630 S 178TH RENTON WA 761680-0130-07 MARLOTTY DONALD E 9622 S 176TH RENTON WA 161680-0140-05 MITCHELL HAROLD W 111+ TAMARA J SLEETER-MITCHELL PO 80X 58488 RENTON WA 161680-0150-02 RAMOS GEORGE 17811 97TH SO RENTON WA 361551 98055 R0177 98055 009999 98058 1216 98055 761660-0070-09 LOMBARDINI VICTORIA 10113 UPR PRESTON'RO SE ISSAQUAH WA 761680-0080-07 3N1787 98027 VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER CREOI3D9999 3915 TALBOT RD #211 RENTON WA 98055 761680-0090-05 ANDEBRHAN.BEYENE+WAINNIEAS089999 9613 S 117TH ST RENTON'WA 98055 761680-0100-03 CHINN DEAN MARK, 9625 S 117TH ST RENTON WA 761680-0120-09 8RINGHURST EDWARD 9630'S 178TH RENTON WA 761680-0130~07 HARLOTTY DONALD E 9622 S 178TH RENTON WA' 761680-0140-05 MITCHELL HAROLD W 111+ TAMARA J SLEETER-MITCHELL PO BOX 58488 RENTON WA 161680-0150-02 RAMOS. GEORGE 11811 97TH SO RENTON WA 072977 98055 361551 98055 R0177· 98055 009999 98058 1276 98055 161660-0300-01 MILLER DANIEL E 9612 S 111TH ST RENTON WA 161680-0310-09 JONES-POWELL RUBY L 9622 S 111TH ST RENTON WA 98055 '1~(\u:k 0 e-\i J«' 229999 715109 98055 855860-0185-03 ~l,lY\Cl~\~ SA TES VERLA M ,,",11-~ 309999 9603 SOUTH 115TH STREET RENTON WA 98055 855860-0190-06 STRAND DALLAS+KATHLEEN R 507 S 38TH CT RENTON WA 855860-0195-01 VAUGHN HILL 515 S 3BTH CT RENTON WA 855860-0200-04 ROSS DAVID 521 S 38TH CT RENTON WA 369999 98055 904166 98055 339999 98055 000000-0000-00 ••••••••••••••••••••• * ••••••• * ••• ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 161680-0300-01 MILLER OANIF.L E 9612 S 111TH S1 RENTON WA 761680-0310.,..09 JONES-POWELL RUBY L 9622 S 111TH ST RENTON WA 855860-0185-03 BATES VERLA M 98055 9603 SOUTH 115THSTREET RENTON·WA· 855860-0190-06 STRANO OALLAS+KATHlEEN R 501 S 38TH CT RENTON WA 855860-0195-01 VAUGHN HILL 515 S 38TH CT RENTON WA 855860-0200-04 ROSS DAVID 521 S 38TH CT RENTON WA 229999 115109 98055 309999 98055 369999 98055 904166 98055 339999 98055 312305-9040-04 LYNN ELIZABETH TRUST 005198 C/O JSH PROPERTIES 14900 INTERURBAN AVE S #210 SEATTLE WA 98168 312305-9092-01 PARK TOWER ASSOCIATES L.L 149999 POBOX 3401 BELLEVUE WA 98009 312305-9040-04 LYNN ELIZABETH TRUST 005198 C/O JSH PROPERTIES 14900 INTERURBAN AVE S #210 SEATTLE WA' 98168 312305-9092-01 PARK TOWER ASSOCIATES L.L 149999 P 0·80X 3401 8ELLEVUE WA 98009 • DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISI WAI\7ER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS Calculations f :¢:~i9r~~:¥.~p.~:t.9~:P'i~P.!~~:~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: Construction Mitigation Description 2 AND 4 :p~n~!~:W~r.ks~~~t:;::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: Drainage Control Plan 2 :t?f~i~~9.~:R.~p.~~:~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: Elevations, Architectural 3 AND 4 .. . . . .... , ..... , .. ,. .. ............ . ............ . :~q~lr9ii~t~I:¢h~~~!j~t:~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: Existing Covenants (Recorded Copy) 4 :$~i~t!89.:~~~~f;ri~~~~:~e~r~~~:¢~p'y'j:~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ,:::::::::::::::::::::::~:::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: Flood Hazard Data 4 c::::tV , :Fi~~r::PI~i:i~:~:~~~:~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: Geotechnical Report 2 AND 3 '$.radii:ig::p.i~ri:::¢~ri~~Ptu~(~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: '::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: Grading Plan, Detailed 2 :~~~it~t:9~t~:)~#(i~4::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: .::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: King County Assessor's Map Indicating Site 4 :~:rt.~~#'p'in~::eIMi::¢9h¢~~ty~':~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: Legal Description 4 :P#f8t::$~f.~~#'~f.~~::~f:~P.#t:f¥:9~n~r:#:~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: Mailing Labels for Property Owners 4 M~p.:~f:$i~tf.~~:~I~:¢'~~~i~I~~$:~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: '::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: Master Application Form 4 :MC;i~~tT:i~iJt:¢~~~~:(~n~::~i:iiiC;i8~ijieht):~::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: Neighborhood Detail Map 4 This requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services Section 2. Public Works Plan Review Section 3. Building Section 4. Development Planning Section Q:\WEB\Pw\OEVSERWorms\Planning\waiver.xls 01/0612004 .VELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS !?.UY:;::·t:4~RW:e~6t~:~~~¥.:x~mfHH!!.:.;./:!) /!~I;m!:!U!mA~~~~~!!! .i!!":!!!!<!//.!Y!::fB#M~HI#H!!!!:!!:HH·!.i:!./!· Parking, Lot Coverage & Landscaping Analysis 4 R:1~~:~~~~~~~~:~p.Mr~~~:::;:;::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::;: ::::::;:::;:::::::;:;:;:::;:::;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:::::::::::::;:;:;:::::;:;:;:;:;:::::::::::::::::: Postage 4 ~~~p.p.ii~~i~8:M~~ti~9;~~if:iiil~&;~:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;: :;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:::;:;:;:;:;:;: ;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:::;:;:;: ;:;:;:;:;:::;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:::::;:::::;:::::;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:::;:;:;:; Public Works Approval Letter2 ~~~~~~'!~~~(<?~:R~~;f;;::;:;;;:;::;::;:;:;:::::::;::;;:;:;:::;:::;;;;::;:;:::;:::;:::;::;;::: :;:;::;::;:;:::;;;;;::::::::::: :;:::::::::;::;:;::;;:::::::::;: :::::::::;;:::::;:;:;:;;;:;:;;:;::::::;:;:::;::::;:::;:;::::::::;;;;;;;::;;:;:::::::;:::::;:;:;;; Screening Detail 4 ~~~~:;~I~~;~;~~:~;:;;;;;::;;;;;:::::;;:;:;:::::;:;::;;;;:;;:;;::;;::;::::::::;;:;::;::;;::;;::;;;;:;: ;::;;;;;;;;:;:::::;:::;;::;;::: ;;;;;;:::;::;;;:;::;;:;::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::;:::;::;;::::::::::::::::::::::;:::::::;::::::::::;:;;;;:;:;:;;:;:;:;;;;;;;:;;; Street Profiles 2 t.~!~:~~P8~:#::~!*;¢~~if.~~~~;~:;;;;;:::::;::;:::::;::;;;;;::;:::;::::::~;;:;: :::Sp:::::;;;;:;;;: ;;:::;:;:::;::::::::;::::;;::::; ::;:;::;;:::::::::;:;;:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::;:::::;:::;::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: Topography Map3 Tt~#i~:~~~W;~::::;::::;;;::;;:;:;:::;::::::::::;;;;:;:;;;;;:;:;:;;::::;;;::::;::::;;;:;:;;:;:;;:::; ~;;:;;:;:::;:::: :;::;:;:::;;:;;::::::::::;;:::;: ::;:;;::;::;;:::::;:;;::;;::::;;:::;:::::::::;:;::;:;:::;;;;;::::::;;;::;:;;:;:::;;:::::;;:;;::;: Tree Cutting/Land Clearing Plan 4 Y~~~::¢~~~f:i?~!9q;9~~H~y';:qj~~~~:R~~~~;;:;;;;;;:;;: ::;;:;::;;;:::::;:;;:;;;;;:;;;; ;;:;;;;;:;;;:;;:::;;:;;:;;:;:;;; ;;;;;:;;:;;;::;;;:::;;::;;;;;;::;;:;;;;;::;;:;;;:::::;:;;;:;:;:;:::;;;::;;:;:;;:;;:;:;::;;:::::;: Utilities Plan, Generalized 2 w~ti~~;Mit~tjci~:P:~r(:Firi~J;4::;:::::::::::;:;:::::;:::;:::;:::::;:;:;:: ;:~:;:;:;:::;:; :::;:::;:::::;:::;;;:;:;:;:::::: :;:;:;:::::;:::::;:;:;:;:;:;:::;:;:::::;:::;:::;:::::;:::::::::;:;:::::;:::;:;:::::;:;:::::::;:;: Wetlands Mitigation Plan, Preliminary 4 ~ W.~~i~~~~::R~p~r.tiP~I~~~~~(<?~::~::;:;:;:;:::::::;:::;:::;:;:::;:::;:;:;:;:;:;:;:: ::;::;g~j:;:; :;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:::::;:;:::::: :;:::;:;:;:;:::;:::::;:::;:;:::::;:::;:::;:::;:;:::;:;:;:;:;:::;:::;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:::::;:;:;: '-" Wireless: Applicant Agreement Statement 2 AND 3 Inventory. of Existing Sites 2 AND 3 Lease Agreement, Draft 2 AND 3 Map of Existing Site Conditions 2 AND 3 Map of View Area 2 AND 3 Photosimulations 2 AND 3 This requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services Section 2. Public Works Plan Review Section 3. Building Section 4. Development Planning Section PROJECT ::~:;:f::~:;:'!t:~::.::f'tt.:#d::(j:~~tYItc_ "-':_'-:~ CITY OF RENTON RECEIVED APR 0 2 200~ BUILDING DIVISION Q:\WEB\Pw\OEVSERv\Forms\Planning\waiver.xls 01/06/2004 APR-02-2004 16:10 ~188J 2066212306 P.01/01 nbbj 'TELEFAX COVER SHEET -------_ .. _ ... -.-.. _._--_ .. _--- DATE (MONTH 00. 00001 t 4-'z..~ TO bAV1?e6J../ I-/ICt:JLA '1. ...... -__ ... COMPANY u/1'Y tJ,.~)JTt)U PHONE fAX 4V5 4--eo 7Z-~/ MESSAC:E~ P~OJECT NUMBER ZA-f}f;t: . * PRY~f-/!P!J/~ .. ~ SUB~L, .o~~~t./ 'lUMSER OF PAGES. INe~UOING COII£~ SI1EET I PLEASE DISTRIBUTE COPIES TO: ORIGINAl, WI~~ se SENT lilA: o MAIL o COU~lefl o AIR EXPRESS ~ WIU NOT BE ~eNT LEGAL DESCRIPTION ALL THAT PORTION .rE lHE NORm 1/2 Of lHE NOR1H~ 1/4 OF ~CllON 31, . . TO~SHlP 23 NORlH. RANGE' 5 EAST, W.lA •. LYlNG NORlHERlY (F lHE NORlHERLY UARQN (f' scum 180th SlREET; WES IERL Y Of lHE-WES1ERL Y WARlJN Of HN~oo( ROAD (TALBOT HIll ROAD)· (96th AVENUt SOUlH); EASlERlY Of PRlUARY STAlE HIOOWAY NO.5 (EAST VAllEY FREEWAY). . LOCAlED ()J SOUltf 180th s1REET BETv.ttN VAU£Y FREEWAY ON THE WEST AND . 96th A\9JUE SOUlli ON lHE EAST. CITY OF RENTON RECEIVED APR 0 2 2004 BUILDING DIVISION III ~OUTH JACKSON STREET SEAnLE WA 9~.l04 1/01 TOTAL P.01 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21 C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTA~ SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read cas o~~ti!iBCi:S~," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. R E eEl 'IJ t APR 02 2004 BUILDING DIVISION 1:124XH2_11OI24KH2_46IAl1minlCily_,iCRenronIEnvimnmelllal Checklist 03241>1.doc A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Valley Medical Center Expansion Project 2. Name of applicant: Valley Medical Center 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: James R. Hobbs, NBBJ 111 South Jackson Seattle, WA 98104 4. Date checklist prepared: 19 January 2004 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton (206) 223-5188 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): See attached schedule. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected • with this proposal? If yes, explain. . Future expansion will occur but not with this proposal. Nothing is planned at this time. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. None 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Building Permit Department of Health 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of * The project and site. See attached. 1:\24882_00\24882_ 46\Admin\Clty_oCRenton\Environmental Checklist 0324D4.doc 2 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. 400 South 43rd Street, Renton, WA See attached. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); flat6~~hi"y, steep slopes, mountainous, other . b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) 10% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. The site solis are generally composed of (Qgt) Lodgment Till consisting of sand, slit, clay, and gravel. Refer to Geotechnical Report for Valley Medical Center - Surgery by GeoEngineers of Seattle, WA dated 01/16/04. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. None e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Grading will be done for leveling the new parking lot. Some export of solis from the site Is expected. 1. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Erosion could occur as a result of leveling the parking area. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? A basin area of 3.8 acres was studied with this project consisting of existing 2.17 acres of paved Impervious and 1.63 acres of lawn and landscape areas. A net of 17,360 SF (0.4 acres) of Impervious pavement was added to the site consisting of the proposed parking lot and entry Improvements. The new "impervious to pervious" ration on this 3.8 acre basin is 2.57 acres of Impervious to 1.23 acres of lawn and landscape. Refer to Valley Medical Center Surgery Expansion - Storm water Technical Information Report by Magnusson Klemencic Associates dated February 25, 2004. 1:\24882_00\24882_ 46\Admin\City_of_Renlon\Envlronmental Checklist 032404.doc 3 h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Temporary erosion control measures will be in effect during construction. Proposed measures for this site after construction include landscaping any areas affected by construction that are not proposed to be paved. 1:\24882_00\24882_ 46\Admin\Clty_o'-Renton\Environmental Checklist 0324D4.doc 4 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (Le., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Emission types to the air would be from construction equipment during construction and from normal travel activity after construction. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: None 3. WATER a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No 5) Does the proposal lie within a 1 ~O-year flood plain? If so, note location on the site plan. No 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No 1:\24882_00\24882_ 46\Admin\City _oLRenton\Environmentai Checklist 032404.doc 5 b. Ground Water: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals ... ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters, If so, describe. The source of runoff on this site is composed of vehicular traffic areas, pedestrian areas, and landscape areas. The existing 2 year, 24 hour storm discharge is 1.12 cfs. The proposed 2 year, 24 hour storm event will be 0.87 cfs. Refer to Valley Medical Center Surgery Expansion -Stormwater Technical Information Report by Magnusson Klemenclc Associates dated February 25, 2004. 2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Per City of Renton Stormwater Management Guidelines a combination water quality wet-vault and detention system Is proposed for this project to treat 30,900 SF of vehicular pavement. No waste material under normal use of the paved facilities is likely to enter ground or surface waters downstream. Refer to Valley Medical Center Surgery Expansion -Stormwater Technical Information Report by Magnusson Klemencic Associates dated February 25, 2004. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Per City of Renton Storm water Management Guidelines a combination water quality wet-vault and detention system is proposed for this project to treat 30,900 SF of vehicular pavement. No waste material under normal use of the paved facilities is likely to enter ground or surface waters downstream. Refer to Valley Medical Center Surgery Expansion -Storm water Technical Information Report by Magnusson Klemencic Associates dated February 25, 2004. 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: -1L deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other -1L evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other -1L shrubs _X_ grass __ pasture __ crop or grain __ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bull rush, skunk cabbage, other 1:\24882_00\24882_ 46\Admin\City_oLRenton\Environmental Checklist 032404.doc 6 __ water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other __ other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Mostly grass and a few deciduous trees. Existing shrubs, lawn and some ornamental deciduous trees will be removed where required for new construction. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Proposed landscaping around new construction will be predominantly lawn and ornamental plantings, to match the existing landscape character of the medical campus. Plans call for preservation of existing large ornamental trees adjacent to the construction areas to the extent possible. 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other None known Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other None known Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other None __ _ b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain No d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electricity will be used for the site and building systems. Natural gas will be used for the heating system. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. None 1:\24882_00\24882_ 46\Admin\Clty_oCRenton\Envlronmental Checklist 0324D4.doc 7 c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts. if any: Some existing single pane windows are being replaced with double pane windows. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards. including exposure to toxic chemicals. risk of fire and explosion. spill. or hazardous waste. that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so. describe. None 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards. if any: None 1:\24882_00\24882_46\Admin\City_oCAenton\Environmental Checklist 032404.doc 8 b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. There will be traffic and some equipment during construction of the expansion. On a long term basis he noise would be from normal vehicle traffic utilizing this hospital. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: The removal of the heliport will reduce periodic long term noise. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Hospital and heliport. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No c. Describe any structures on the site. Existing hospital and support structures. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No. Structures will be demolished. There will be additions to this hospital and Internal remodel. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? CO (P) f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Center Institution. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No? i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? There are no new people. They are all existing for the most part. 1:\24882_00\24882_ 46\Admln\Clty_oCRenton\Envlronmental Checklist 032404.doc 9 j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? There will not be people displaced. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N/A I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: N/A 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. N/A b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. N/A c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N/A 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. 33 feet is the maximum height of the structure. Concrete, glass and roofing are the proposed exterior materials. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: N/A 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? The clerestory at 9 feet tall could create some glare to the south. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No 1:\24882_00\24882_46\Admin\Clty_o'-Renton\Environmental Checklist 032404.doc 10 c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? None b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. N/A c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: N/A 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to. be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. None b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. N/A c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: N/A 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. See site plan b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? New spaces 63 Displaced spaces_ .=23=---_ 1:\24882_00\24882_ 46\Admln\City_oCRenton\Envlronmental Checklist 032404.doc 11 d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private? There will be a new connection to the proposed parking. See site plan. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. N/A f. How many vehicular trips per day would· be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. There will be no changes to the existing volumes. . g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: N/A 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. There will be no increased need for public services. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. N/A 16. UTILITIES a. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. The project utilities will be the combined use of the ones Identified above. C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: Name Printed: Date: 1:\24882_00\24882_ 46\Admin\City _o,-Renton\Envlronmental Checklist 032404.doc 12 lI'II'II'.lIhb;'IOIiI April 1.2004 Ms. Susan Fiala City of Renton. Development Services Division lOSS South Crady Way. 6th Floor Renton. W A 98055 Subject: Valley Medical Center Expansion Project -Site Plan Review, N Bill Job #24882.46 Dear Ms, Fiala. Valley Medical Center would like to submit the requirements for the site plan for the review of the hospital expansion project. The project name is: Valley Medical Center Expansion Project and is located on their main hospital campus at 400 South 43'<1 Street. Renton. WA. 98055. The project consists of a building expansion to the main hospital and extensive interior remodel to the interior. The building is three stories with the main hospital entrance on the third floor. Surgcry -3J'd Floor There will be an expansion to the east which will include a new drop off for hospital and surgery patients. The existing courtyard with the fountain will be enclosed and provide additional space for the surgery department. admilling. gift shop. and support space. The existing vacated administration space on the third floor will be remodeled for tile expanded surgery department which will have ten new surgeries. 26 Pre-Op Post-Op rooms, and support space. There will also be an expansion to the west on the roof of the second floor which will contain a corridor and stair for the new surgeries. Sitc The site will be developed to accommodate the new drop off at the hospital entrance. There will be a new parking lot to the south with space for 73 cars. The existing heliport will be removed to allow for the new parking area. There will be a pedestrian bridge from the new parking area back to the new entrance and drop off area on the third floor. Surgery -2"'1 Floor The existing surgery department located on the second floor will be totally gutted and remodeled to contain eight new surgeries and support space. CITY OF RENTON RECEIVED APR 0 2 2004 BUILDING DIVISION III SOU II, J,\CKSON SI111:EI ~EA1TLE IVA 981o,1 TI 206 223 5555 PI 201, 621 2300 [JjJf1J)bj Ms. Susan Fiala City of Renton. Development Services Division April 1.2004 Page 2 Fumily Ccntcr -2'1(1 Floor The existing family birthing center is located on the second 1100r of the hospital. It will be totally gutted and remodeled to contain a new family center with 36 labor delivery. recovery postpartum rooms and support space. The existing childrens thempy department adjacent 10 Ihe family center will be relocated to an off campus site. The vacated space will be remodeled 10 contain a new Level III Neonatal Intensive Care Unit for 23 babies. There will be a small building expansion to the north to contain a new corridor and patio for Ihe family center. We have included and attached additional project descriptions: • Summary of Work • Project Phasing • Project Schedule The total estimated construction cost of the project is $28.800.000.00. We have enclosed the submiLLal requirements. Please let us know if you have any questions or need additional information. Thank you for your review. Senior Associate Phone: 206-223-5188 Email: jhobbs@nbbj.com Attachments C: Todd Thomas. VMC Trevor Hart. YMC Tim Carter. NI3BJ Central File 1:124KH2_(l0l24KK2_4(,IAciminICily_oCRcnlnnISiIC Plall Rcvicw_llr.DOC RETCOE;VED APR 02 2004 BUILDING DIVISION VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER EXPANSION PROJECT SECTION 01110 SUMMARY OF WORK PART 1 • GENERAL 1.1 A. 1.2 A. B. C. WORK COVERED BY CONTRACT DOCUMENTS Description: The project consists of 105,000 square feet of major medical remodeling and 20,000 square feet of new exterior enclosure. The interior remodel occurs on up to 3 floors within the existing hospital, in 2 distinct regions. Work includes major mechanical and electrical service and equipment upgrades including modifications and additions to the existing rooftop penthouses. The project involves multiple phasing and several partial substantial completions and temporary occupancy permits in order to allow use of specific areas within the facility while construction is proceeding. All work will be performed while the existing facility is occupied; particular attention and temporary facilities must be provided and maintained including, but not limited to, interim exiting and life safety, temporary HVAC and electrical connections, temporary public corridors, infection control measures and temporary certificates of occupancy. The medical facility improvements include operating rooms and patient care areas, labor delivery and post-partum rooms, neo-natal intensive care, administrative areas and ancillary medical support spaces. PROJECT INFORMATION The Owner: Valley Medical Center, 400 South 43rd Street, Renton, WA.; Trevor Hart, Owner's Representative; phone (425) 228-3440, Ext. 5961; Fax (425) 656-4065 The Architect: NBBJ" 111 South Jackson, Seattle, WA 98104; Project Manager, Jim Hobbs. Consultants to the Architect: 1. Mechanical Design: CDI, 19203 36th Avenue West, Suite 106, Lynnwood, Washington 98036; Project Engineer, Klaus Tilla 2. Electrical Design: Sparling, 720 Olive Way, Suite 1100, Seattle, WA 98101; Project Engineer, Jim Degnan. 3. Structural Engineer: MKA, 1301 Fifth Avenue Suite 3200 Seattle, WA 98101-2699 Project Engineer, Eric Anderson 4. Civil Engineer: MKA, 1301 Fifth Avenue Suite 3200 Seattle, WA 98101-2699 Project Engineer, Jaime Saez 5. Landscape Architect, SiteWorkshop, 159 Western Ave A480 Seattle WA 98119 Project Landscape Architect, Sue Eastman CITroI' R E CERENTON IVED APR 0 2 200~ BUILDING D IVISION 24882.46 01110-1 BID SET 29 MARCH 2004 VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER EXPANSION PROJECT SECTION 01110 SUMMARY OF WORK 1.3 HOSPITAL PROJECT REQUIREMENTS A. Infection Control: This project requires Level 2 Infection Control Procedures. See Infection Control Permit Requirements following this section. 1. Contractor is liable for cleaning, repair, or replacement of finishes, equipment, and supplies damaged as a result of construction operations or failure to comply with infection control requirements. B. Indoor Air Quality: To the extent required for work performed at the Hospital, all adhesives, mastics, coatings, cleaning agents, etc., shall be "low-odor, "extremely low VOC", "solvent-free" having emissions of less than 150 grams/liter. C. See Section 01500 -"Temporary Facilities and Controls" for additional requirements. 1.4 CONTRACTOR A. Contractor's Duties: In addition to duties specified throughout the Contract Documents the Contractor's duties are generally as follows: B. Construction Costs: Except as specifically noted, provide and pay for labor, materials and equipment, tools, construction equipment and machinery, supplementary heat and lighting, utilities required for construction, and other facilities and services necessary for proper execution and completion of the Work. 1. Electrical power and water will be furnished by Owner. C. Taxes: Pay legally required sales, consumer, business, excise, and use taxes; Washington State Sales Tax applied to materials and labor incorporated into the Work will be paid to the Contractor separately from the Contract Sum by the Owner. D. Regulations & Notices: Comply with Codes, ordinances, rules, regulations, and other requirements of public authorities which pertain to the completion of the Work and give all required notices, including written notice to the Architect of any observed variances in the Contract Documents with legal requirements. It is not the Contractor's responsibility to make certain that the Contract Documents comply with Codes and regulations, only to give notice when he is aware of said variance. E. Coordination: Coordinate work of the various trades and subcontractors to assure efficient and orderly sequence of installation of construction elements, with provisions for accommodating items installed later. Verify that characteristics of elements of interrelated operating equipment are compatible; coordinate work of various sections having interdependent responsibilities for installing, connecting to, and placing in service, such equipment. 1.5 CONTRACT FORM A. Form of Contract: Refer to Division O. 24882.46 01110-2 BID SET 29 MARCH 2004 VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER EXPANSION PROJECT SECTION 01110 SUMMARY OF WORK 1.6 TIME FOR COMPLETION A. Contract Time: In accordance with the Division 0, the completion time for the Work shall be not later than the time stipulated in the Agreement. 1.7 WORK SEQUENCES A. The Contractor is responsible for coordinating the scheduling of each phase with the Owner's representative to determine critical impacts to life safety services and utilities vital to Hospital operations. 1.8 MISCELLANEOUS WORK A. Overtime: Overtime, double-shifting and longer than-normal single shifts are the decision of the Contractor and will not be considered reason or justification for extra compensation, unless specifically approved in advance by the Owner; no additional payment will be allowed over and above the Contract amount for overtime unless overtime work is specifically requested by the Owner. 1.9 USE OF PREMISES A. General: Confine operations at Hospital as indicated and as restricted by the Owner. Confine operation to site to areas permitted by law, ordinances, permits, and the Contract Documents. Allow no materials or equipment to unreasonably encumber the site. 1. Temporary Facilities and Controls: Refer to Section 01500. B. Verification of Existing Conditions: 1. Contract Documents Drawings do not necessarily represent complete or exact existing conditions; therefore, Contractor shall examine existing conditions as required to determine any conditions affecting the Work. C. Special Precautions: 1. The Owner will continue to occupy the buildings and spaces in the immediate vicinity during its normal hours. Protect safety of building occupants at all times, including maintaining usability of exist stairways and corridors. 2. Interruption of building access and operation will not be permitted. Limit construction operation and methods to those that will not unduly affect the working environment of the Owner's occupied spaces, including noise, dust, odors, hazards and other undesirable effects and conditions. Special caution is emphasized because patients will be occupying this facility during all portions of the construction. 3. The Contractor shall immediately reschedule work that impairs Hospital operations to time agreeable with the Owner. 4. Work in adjacent spaces shall be coordinated with the Owner at least one week in advance of the work. D. Project Procedures: Work shall be conducted with regard to the following limitations and restrictions. 24882.46 01110-3 BID SET 29 MARCH 2004 VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER EXPANSION PROJECT SECTION 01110 SUMMARY OF WORK 1. Allow hospital to continue operations 24 hours per day, 7 days per week throughout all construction phases. 2. Premium time, if required to accomplish the work while maintaining operation of the hospital, shall be included in the bid price. 3. Do not obstruct public or service access to and from the existing building. 4. Maintain proper barriers to isolate sound, dirt, fire-separations, fumes, temperature, and unsightly conditions when working in or adjacent to the existing structure. 5. Fire separations, in accordance with Fire Marshal's recommendation, must be maintained between existing and new construction. 6. Maintain existing required exits in accordance with Fire Marshal's recommendation. E. Work Area: Refer to drawings. Contractor's work, staging and storage areas will generally be confined to the work area indicated. 1. Stage and store materials and tools in designated locations and in a manner specifically approved by Owner's Representative. Owner assumes no liability for materials, tools, or equipment stored by the Contractor. 2. Contractor's Entrance: All workmen, equipment, and materials shall enter only through the Hospital deSignated entrance. Obtain permission of Owner's Representative for each occurrence when use of another entrance is necessary. 3. Elevators: Use of elevators will be determined by the Owner. 4. Work Hours: Contractor will be restricted to hours of operation as requested by the Hospital. 1.10 PROTECTION A. Personnel: Protect personnel, whether passers-by, occupants of existing buildings, or visitors to the site from harm and injury. B. Existing Facilities: Protect existing and adjoining structures, sidewalks, curbs, streets, utilities, and work of any kind which is to remain from damage, defacement, or interruption of service, except as may be specially directed or authorized. All paving for sidewalks, streets, alleys, and other traffic ways shall be repaired, if damaged, and left in a condition approximating the original condition. Protect existing finishes and equipment shall include: 1. Covering of equipment and furniture with tarps prior to work. 2. Patching and repair of all existing facilities, finishes, or utilities damaged as a result of the work. 3. Damaged and modified finishes shall be restored to condition at time of Contractor's acceptance of Contract. C. Existing Building Services: For building utility shut-downs, direct completed copy of attached form to the Owner at least 7 days in advance of proposed shut-down time. Obtain the Owner's approval prior to proceeding. Refer to Utility Shutdown Request Form attached at end of this Section. 24882.46 \. 01110-4 BID SET 29 MARCH 2004 1.11 COORDINATION VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER EXPANSION PROJECT SECTION 01110 SUMMARY OF WORK A. General: The Contractor is responsible for all construction means and methods and for the general coordination of the work of all trades. B. Site: The Contractor is, in general, the custodian of the site of the project and it is his responsibility to provide access, storage, and work space for all those engaged in the Work. The site shall be maintained in an orderly manner with debris and trash removed daily. C. Salvageable Materials: Refer to Section 02070 for related requirements. 1. Owner salvage materials and materials designated for re-using in the new work will be identified by the Owner, prior to start of work. All other materials will become the Contractor's property and shall be removed from the site at Contractor's expense. 1.12 APPLICABLE CODES: A. Codes and Ordinances: Perform all work in accordance with requirements of Uniform Building Code -1997 including related codes, unless otherwise noted. 1. Washington State Board of Health Hospital Rules and Regulations, 1999 with Amendments. 2. Uniform Plumbing Code. 3. Uniform Mechanical Code. 4. Uniform Fire Code. 5. City of Renton standards and regulations. 6. Valley Medical Center procedures. 7. All other codes within governing jurisdiction. B. Certification of Code Compliance: All materials, methods, and equipment shall comply with requirements of applicable Codes and the Contract Documents, including requirements of all incorporated standards. The Contractor shall furnish, as a part of the Contract, certification of such compliance if requested by the Architect or the Code Enforcing Agency. Such certification shall be submitted in the form of test results or other data from recognized independent testing laboratory. PART 2 -PRODUCTS Not Applicable PART 3 -EXECUTION Not Applicable 24882.46 END OF SECTION 01110-5 BID SET 29 MARCH 2004 PART 1 -GENERAL 1.1 PROJECT PHASING VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER EXPANSION PROJECT SECTION 01112 PROJECT PHASING A. General: This project must be constructed in multiple phases in order to keep the existing hospital in normal 24-hour operation. The phases described herein and indicated in the drawings cannot be altered without approval of the Architect and Owner. The durations for each phase and sub-task are estimated; there is the possibility that durations may be reduced in time, but may not be increased unless the increase is concurrent with other progress and does not extend the project time or create operational impacts to the Owner. Durations must be shown, coordinated and managed through the project schedule. B. Other Phasing Information: Other phasing information concerning mechanical and electrical phase sub-tasks is located in the mechanical and electrical drawings and division 15 and 16 specifications. C. General Phasing Components: Each phase consists of Owner move-out, soft demolition and asbestos abatement, mobilization, general demolition and construction, substantial completion, securing occupancy permit, final closeout and Owner move-in. D. Phasing Coordination: It is the responsibility of this contract to coordinate all aspects of phasing in addition to general coordination requirements described elsewhere. Phasing coordination includes working with all separate contractors hired by the Owner in a cooperative spirit and manner to meet occupancy requirements. Phasing 'coordination involves continual provision, placement, maintenance and relocation of temporary barriers, life safety measures and infection control measures. Phasing coordination requires careful management of shut-down activities. Phasing coordination involves control of work within construction zones and special work occurring beyond the construction limits within occupied areas. E. Phasing Parameters: all phases include work vertically above and below the main floor in which the improvements occur. Work extends horizontally beyond the boundary zones between occupied spaces and construction spaces. Special measures must be taken to accomplish work beyond the construction zones within occupied spaces. 1.2 PHASING DESCRIPTION A. Overview: The project is composed of work in two separate areas of the existing Hospital, the Surgery and the Family Center. Work is concentrated in the second and third floors, but includes less-concentrated work on the first floor, roof penthouses and open roof. Work is directly impacting the final improved spaces, but is also impacting adjacent spaces, horizontally and vertically, with the renovation and remodeling of building systems and infrastructure. The Surgery consists of two primary phases, S-1 and S-2. The Family Center consists of two primary phases FC-1 and FC-2. Within all primary phases are sub-tasks, involving the replacement and upgrade of building systems. 24882.46 01110-1 BID SET 29 MARCH 2004 VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER EXPANSION PROJECT SECTION 01112 PROJECT PHASING B. Surgery Phase S-1: Approximately 12 month's duration. Consists of construction of· operating rooms, patient bedrooms, support spaces, administrative offices, and new lobby on the third floor of the hospital. New lobby construction involves infill of the existing entrance courtyard with new enclosed building area. Surgery construction includes new exterior addition to contain corridor; located on existing second floor roof. Structural work includes new infill structure, new structural floor openings, new shear walls and other beams and reinforcing; the structural work between the lowest floor levels and the new and existing roofs; structural work creates collateral damage to existing construction that must be restored. Mechanical and electrical infrastructure improvements include new and replacement piping, HVAC and electrical work from the roof penthouses through multiple floors and horizontal extensions in each floor. Construction of all site improvements except for the Family Center courtyard is to be completed in Phase S-1 . C. Surgery Phase S-2: Approximately 12 month's duration. Consists of construction of operating rooms, post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) and support spaces, on the second floor of the hospital. This phase involves work vertically and horizontally beyond the second floor construction zone similar to phase S-1. D. Family Center Phase FC-1 : Approximately 9 month's duration. Hospital second floor. Consists of construction of labor/delivery/recovery/post-partum (LDRP) rooms in wings 2C and 20 and construction of the Neo-natal intensive care unit (NICU). Includes construction of small exterior addition to contain new corridor. Work includes extensive replacement and upgrade of roof penthouse mechanical equipment, piping and new replacement ductwork. E. Family Center Phase FC-2: Approximately 9 month's duration. Hospital second floor. Consists of construction of LDRP rooms and support spaces in wing 2E and in the Triage and support areas. Work includes extensive replacement and upgrade of roof penthouse mechanical equipment, piping and new replacement ductwork. 1.3 PHASING SCHEDULE A. Phasing Schedule: attached at the end of this section. The phase and sub-task dates provide a framework for development of a detailed construction schedule. PART 2 -PRODUCTS Not Applicable PART 3 -EXECUTION Not Applicable 24882.46 END OF SECTION 01110-2 BID SET 29 MARCH 2004 I.. nbbj March 26, 2004 Valley Medical Center, Job #24882.46 . Site Plan Review City of Renton Item # 11 Construction Mitigation Description • Proposed construction dates: o Begin construction: June 7,2004 o End construction: June 30, 2006 • Hours and days of construction: o 7:00am -7:00pm Monday thru Friday 'MEMORANOUM o These hours may vary depending on special construction tasks. • Proposed hauling/transportation routes: o Most hauling will occur from the existing campus entrances to South 43rd Street and Talbot Road to Highway 167 and 180lh Street. Depending on the type and size of items being hauled this route may vary. • Measures to be implemented to minimize dust, traffic, and transportation impacts, erosion, mud, noise, and other noxious characteristics. o A general contractor will not been selected until after receipt of bids. Details will need to be refined after the contractor is selected. o Some of the mitigating measures will be: • Water trucks -to reduce dust during excavation. • Traffic control -along South 43rd Street and Talbot Rmid during large truck access and multiple truck access. • Street cleaners -if mud and dirt accumulates on streets. • Temporary erosion control -if occurs, pending weather conditions. • Schedule any noisy activities -to minimize impact to the hospital and community. • Any special hours proposed for construction or hauling (i.e. weekends and late nights) o Details will need to be worked out with the contractor after being selected. Some of the activities may need to occur early morning, late nights, and weekends as follows: • Movement of a large crane for construction erection to and from the site. • Materials in large components delivered to the site: • Precast concrete pedestrian bridge • Large skylights • Air handling units • Large quantities of miscellaneous building macterials I'tY OF RENTON RECEIVED APR 0 2 2004 BUILDING DIVISION 11 t SOUTH JACKSON STREET SEATTLE WA 98104 Tl 206 223 5555 F) 206 621 2300 1/01 nbbj • MEMORANDUM • Preliminary traffic control plan: o South 43rd Street and Talbot Road have heavy traffic during business hours. Access to the site during peak hours will need to be minimized for activities mentioned above. Traffic control at intersections and site access points will be scheduled to minimize disruption to normal traffic flow. Dates and times will need to be scheduled and coordinated with the selected contractor and their construction schedule. C: Central File 1:\24882_00\24882_46\Admin\City_oCRenton\site Plan Review Item #ll.doc ,. nbbj ·MEMORANDUM ------------------------------------------------------- March 24, 2004 Valley Medical Center, Job #24882.46 Site Plan Review City of Renton Item #20 Landscape Analysis, lot coverage, and parking analysis • Total square footage of the site and footprints of all buildings: o Site area calculation: Parcel 8857670100 655,145 SF Parcel 8857670010 386,806 SF Parcel 8857670030 13,638 SF 1,055,589 SF • Total square footage of existing and proposed impervious surface areas. o We are affecting a very small amount of the existing impervious surface area. A basin area of 3.8 acres was studied consisting of existing 2.17 acres of paved impervious and 1.63 acres of lawn and landscaped areas. A net addition of 17,360 SF (0.4 acres) of impervious pavement is proposed. This is the new proposed parking lot and entry improvements. See stormwater technical informalion report by Magnusson Klemencic Associates dated 2/25/04. • Square footage (by floor and overall total) of each individual building and or use. • The main hospital areas are as follows: o Level One: 76,097 existing o Level Two: 160,242 existing 1,240 new o Level Three: 111,812 existing 22,350 new 371,741 SF total new and existing Percentage of lot covered by building or structures: o Site area for the main hospital: • Parcel 8857670010 386,806 SF • Building footprint 161,482 SF • 161,482 + 386,806 = 42% R fe/Tv OF RENTON CflVED APR 02 2004 BUILDING DIVISION 111 SOUTH JACKSON STREET SEATTLE WA 98104 T) 206 223 6655 FI 206 621 2300 1/01 . ., nbbj ·MEMORANDUM ------------------------------------------------------------ • Number of parking spaces required by city code: o See the attached parking summary prepared by Walker Parking Consultants. They indicate a total of 2,055 spaces as detailed on Table 1 & 8. pages 3 & 9. There are an additional 186 spaces in the south parking lot. • Existing Campus Total: 2.241 spaces o This project will revise total as follows: • Delete 23 spaces at entry court • Add 63 new spaces at new south lot • Equals 40 total new spaces • New Campus Total: 2,281 spaces • Number and dimensions of standard, compact and ADA accessible spaces provided: o There are a total of 81 existing accessible stalls. See Table I, page 3 of Walker report. o The new parking lot will have the following: • 36 -compact stalls at 8.5' x 16' • 27 -standard stalls at 9' x 18' • 0 -accessible stalls • Square footage of parking lot landscaping (perimeter and interior) o Perimeter -3,600 SF o Interior -2,208 SF o Area of parking lot 22,610 SF • 2,208 + 22,610 = 10% Attachment (parking summary prepared by Walker Parking Consultants) C: Central File 1:\24882_00\24882_46\Admin\City_oCRenton\site Plan Review Item #20.doc Page 2 of 2 i ./ r i , , , , ! I , ! , I 1 I II', ,I (J _. f/ 1('·'-.,.): ..... / r ... · /( ~.... -- I' / .• ./1 I , / r' f·, '-----. '.- < jA' a: '-m 3 "'Q.. ~ m -0 0 ~, S' cc ~ ~~ ,'l "-.) § ~~ o 1ft ~a -S n 1ft ~ 1ft :l1:li .... ~~. r--n m C) ~ C) ·;:t. m C ',.,' . Z ;;:0 " ,-' m 9 "1J 0 .., ~ ::l ~ r-m -0 Q. 3 ;;r "< In C '"U In a: III ~I 0-0' .., (1) "< 0' -0 m ::l 0 Ii ~ -0 -0 0 0 S' ~ ~ cc s' s' cc cc ~:II q " '" 1ft --"" " " '" '" --" '" ~ '8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ e e e fj e f) e ~ e e e e e e e e e e e te , .. VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER PARKING STUDY /'My 8,2002 PROJECT #33-1307.00 DEMAND RATIOS In order to determine the parking demand at a particular hospital we must first establish its own specific set of demand ratios, As a starting point we use a set of basic demand ratios that are used in the parking industry to provide rough estimates of parking generation, These "generic" ratios are often incorporated into local planning codes to ensure that new construction projects provide adequate parking and do not overburden the existing parking supply around them, Unfortunately, these basic industry standards do not distinguish between the individual characteristics of specific metropolitan areas or institutions, For example, the parking demand of a hospital located in downtown San Fran¢l.~fo would vary consi~,~r,~ply"ffom a hospital of exactly the same Siz~;i!h a suburban comm~DJ~:ilik.~\Sausalito, only ten '1 . ",'''' ',. ,. "'j" ml es away'''';' ".; \ .,. '."",' 'I "1""'I't,,~,; ':, :S//t~{:: -I,iL?:;t1':., t :;;;! In order for derTloiid';~8fiO~;i!to.i be ~~~~~l"" J'I' Y,~,,\.,. i~ study they must be tailored to .t~~ynig~y';e ~:?rditi9.B;~~tn~n~~xf~Jt?t t1'~;1ya"~y Medical . Center. Th~ ftrsL(s.t~~:t'~ t~~~~pro~~~~,,~,~, tq;j~~ndy.gt!~~n Inventory of the current parking Iqtfl>p~::c:am~us, '~WftJ~~ 9R@~ oQ~~~rsday, March 5, 2002. The results of the Inventory 'are sHown In Table 1, Table 1: Lot Inventory -Current Supply User Visitor Physlcion Employee VMC' Accessible Tolol l.otA 137 137 lot B 94 6 2 25 125 lotC 52 21 3 144 18 105 lot D 99 16 115 VPCN 30 6 36 Carpool 79 79 MRI 17 3 20 TPC 181 8 189 Doctor' 5 lot 39 39 Entry Court 10 13 23 Emergency Drive 7 4 11 Structure Overflow 70 70 Parking Structure 196 904 6 1,106 Tolol 883 66 997 28 81 2,055 I Admin, VMC vehicles ond Engineering 2 OB Doctors 3 Doctors Overflow 4 On Coil Nurses WALKER PARKING CONSULTANTS STUDY METHODOLOGY 3 I!t II ... -~ 'l_ I • -,. VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER PARKING STUDY MAY 8, 2002 PROJECT #33-1307.00 visitors and patients. When these factors are applied to a demand figure, the number of spaces that should be provided to meet thot demand is rendered. The combination of using the 851h percentile and the supply factor means that parking may be less convenient on some days of the year (when the supply cushion is exceeded), but there should always be parking spaces for everyone. Once the number of spaces needed to meet demand is determined, it can be compared against supply to determine adequacy. A positive adequacy indicates a surplus of parking spaces, whereas a negative result indicates a deficit. Table 8: Design Day;~~equacy User Patients/Visitors Hospital MOB Total Patient / Visitors Employees '.k: ;,'1.'.:'" ':.'.' • ."', Parking Demand 245 508 753 Hopitol Employees 586 Volunteers 5 MOB Employees 432 Total Employees 1,023 PhYSicians Hospital Physicians 47 Residents 10 MOB Physicians 52 Total Physicians 109 Total Campus 1,885 Supply Factor 90% 90% 95% 95% 95% 100% 95% 95% Spaces Required 272 564 836 617 5 454 1,077 47 10 55 112 2,025 Current Supply 964 1,025 66 2,055 Adequacy 128 (521 (46) 30 As indicated above, Valley Medical Center currently enjoys an overall surplus of 30 spaces at its main campus. There is also a remote parking lot to the south of the main campus. This lot can accommodate an additional 186 vehicles. ~ ~ WALKER PARKtNG CONSULTANTS 9 VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER· EXPANSION PROJECT SECTION 16501 DESCRIPTION: MANUFACTURERS: LAMP: WATTS: COMMENTS: CAN)ELA LIGHT FIXTURE SCHEDULE I Fixture Type M11 I Pole mounted high pressure sodium luminaire, nominal 14" diameter x 21" high. Single head bracket mounted fixture housing per pole with symmetric distribution. Upper housing assembly fabricated from spun aluminum. Gasketed removable aluminum top cover secured by stainless steel faslners. Single piece injection molded UV resistant clear acrylic lens. Spun aluminum specular Alzak dual reflector system consists of collecting and distributing reflectors with 76° cutoff. Manufacturer's standard thermoset TGIC polyester powder coat finish as selected by Architect. 25'-0" round pole, factory painted finish to match fixture housing. Moldcast "Pericline" to match existing. One C250S50 295 Fixture to match existing. R eTcOe ntVE 0 APR 02 2004 BUILDING DIVISION 720 Olive Way· Suite 1400 Seattle. WA 98101 Phone: 206/667-0511 Architectural Lighting Consultants Fax: 206/667-0512 24882.46 16501 -80 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS ac PRINTING 30 JANUARY 2004 VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER· EXPANSION PROJECT SECTION 16501 . LIGHT FIXTURE SCHEDULE DESCRIPTION: MANUFACTURERS: LAMP: WATTS: COMMENTS: I Fixture Type M13 I Pedestrian scale post top lighting fixture, nominal 31" diameter x 31- 1/4" high. Hood and lens frame constructed of die cast aluminum with stainless steel hinge. Horizontal lamp located inside hood for complete cut-off optics. Lamp compartment enclosure sealed by a clear tempered flat glass lens, with one piece molded silicone gasket. Underside of hood painted white polyester powdercoat. Wiring concealed in one of four extruded support rods connected to die cast aluminum ballast chamber. Top of ballast chamber painted white polyester powdercoat. 10' tall, 4" round straight steel pole, with bolt cover. Factory painted finish on pole and bolt cover to match fixture housing; color as selected by Architect. UL listed for wet location. Aromat or Advance electronic ballast. Kim Bounce Series One CDMI 001U1MI3K (Philips MasterColor) 110 Provide complete with concrete base. Fixture drawing is an Illustration of one acceptable manufacturer CAN)ELA Architectural Lighting Consultants 24882.46 16501 -82 720 Olive Way • Suite 1400 Seattle, WA 98101 Phone: 2061667-0511 Fax: 206/667-0512 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS ac PRINTING 30 JANUARY 2004 · .. GEOENGINEERS, INC. Fax:2067282732 Ma~ 20 2003 t-'.U:.c Geo. Engineers MEMORANDUM TO: Gary Schaefer / NBBJ Plaza 600 Building 600 Stewart Street, Suite 1420 Seattle, W A 98101 (206) 728-2674 Fax: (206) 728-2732 Eric Anderson. P.E'W1M usson Klemencic Associates (MeA) Bo McFadden, P.E. Q May 20, 2003 // 2202-018-00 FROM: DATE: FILE: SUBJECT: Column Foundation Support Evaluation Surgery Center Improvements Valley Medical Center, Renton, Washington INTRODUCTION This memorandum summarizes our initial evaluation of foundation support conditions in the area of the planned improvements to the surgery center at Valley Medical Center 10cl1ted in Renton, Washington. Our evaluation has been completed in general accordance with the Phase 1 services described in our proposal dated April 29. 2003. Our services included review of available site plans and geotechnical studies, a brief site visit to obseTVe site conditions and meet with representatives of Vallcy Medical Center, discussions with project team members, and development of a general subsurface soil profile from existing infomation. We did not complete additional subsurface explorations as part of our Phase 1 seTVices. Based on our discussions with Eric Anderson ofMCA, we understand that the planned improvements will result in a modest increase in the design load (dead and live load) for a column located at the intersection of gridlines Band 13 in the southwest portion of the hospital building. The column extends through the first floor that is at about Elevation 66 feet and is supported below the lower boiler room floor slab that is at about Elevation S4 feet. We understand that the column at gridJines Band 13 is supported on a footing that is 20 inches thioK and has plan dimensions of 6 feet by Ii feet. The bottom of this footing is at approximately Elevation S1.3 feet. We further understand that this footing was designed with an allowable bearing capacity of 6,000 pounds per sqUBl'e foot (pst). The planned improvements will increase the load on the column footing from about 223 kips to 243 kips (dead plus live load). The approximately 9 percent increase in load wiJI increase the bearing on the soil to approximately 6,750 psf. SITE CONDITIONS We reviewed exploration logs for the original Valley Medical Center pmject compieted by Dames and Moore in March 1967. In addition, we reviewed the following two geotechnical reports for projects completed near the project location: • "Report, Geotechnical Engineering Services, Proposed Cogeneration Building, Valley Medical Center. Renton. Washington" completed by GeoEngineers. [nc dated February 9. 1996. CITV OF RENTON RECEIVED APR 0 2 2004 BUILDING DIVISION r1A'r'-20-2003 09: 28 2067282732 96% P.02 i ._" -.... a.. GEOENGINEERS,lNl. j-ax ; iUO ( [i'j£' ( J£. Memorandum to Gary SchaeferfNBBJ and Eric Anderson, P.E.lMCA May 20, 2003 Page 2 • "Renton Soils and Foundation Investigation, Proposed Valley General Hospital Expansion, Renton, Washington" by Roger Lowe Associates Inc dated April 25, 1980. We also made a site visit on May 14, 2003 to observe the column location and ground surface conditions at the site to verify information presented on a site plan we were provided previously for Valley Medical Center projects. The site plan was prepared by Touma Engineers and is based on aerial photographic work completed by Walker Associates. We used the Touma Engineers site plan, topographic mapping included in the plan for the 1967 Dames and Moore study, and exploration logs completed for the Expansion and Cogeneration Building projects to evaluated the impacts of past site grading. The ground surface west of the project area is paved and at about Elevation 63 feet and the boiler room has a finish floor at about Elevations 54 feet. Based on ex.isting site plans and subsurface information, we estimate that the original ground surface in the area of grid lines B and 13 was at about Elevation 74 feet. The exploration logs indicate that dense to very dense glacially consolidated soil was likely encountered at about Elevation 67 feet, considerably above the boiler room finish floor elevation. CONCL.USIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the subsurface profile developed from existing information and generally described above, we conclude that dense glacially consolidated soil was present prior to original construction at approx.imately Elevation 67 feet near the intersection of gridlines B an 13. The bottom of the column footings is at about Elevation 51.3 feet. We therefore expect that the dense glacially consolidated soils below the footing at the intersection of gridlines Band '13 can provide the adequate bearing capacity to support loads on the order of 8,000 to 10,000 psf without appreciable compression of the underlying soil. We therefore conclude that the planned design eolumn load of 243 kips (6,750 psf bearing pressure on the existing foundation) can be supported as planned. Furthermore, we estimate that settlement that may be oaused by the increase in load will be less than I;' inch, We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you on this project. If there are any questions concerning this memorandum or if we can provide additional services, please call. Dlseluimer; Any electronic (orm. facsimile or hllrd cop)' of the original document (email, text, table, andlor figure), if provided, and any attachments Arc only n copy of tne original document. The original document is stored by GeoEngineers, Inc. And will serve as tnc official document of record. MAY-20-2003 09:28 2067282732 96% P.03 CITY OF RENTON FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU MEMORANDUM DATE: November 24, 2003 TO: Susan Fiala, Senior Planner FROM: Corey Thomas, Plans Review Inspector SUBJECT: Preliminary Comments for Valley Medical Center Expansion 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. cr:ct vrncexp The fire flow requirements remain unchanged. The existing looped mains are adequate for the proposed project. The existing fire hydrants on the Valley Medical campus are required to be brought up to existing code and be equipped with 5-inch storz fittings as none of them currently have them. There are approximately 13 existing hydrants that need upgrading. Fire mitigation fees are required at the rate of $0.52 per additional square foot added. This fee is paid at time of building permit issuance. The fire sprinkler system shall be extended throughout the addition. The fire alarm system shall be extended throughout the addition. Fire department access as proposed is adequate. Strongly recommend signage and a physical barrier r like an overhead cross-bar, to limit access of over-size vehicles to the patient load/un oad area. CITY OF RENTON RECEIVED APR 0 2 2004 BUILDING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON MEMO PUBLIC WORKS To: Susan Fiala From: Mike Dotson ~ Date: December 3, 2003 Subject: PreApplication Review Comments PREAPP No. 03-116 -Valley Medical Center Expansion -400 South 43rd St NOTE ON PRELIMINARY REVIEW COMMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS MEMO: The following comments on development and permitting Issues are based on the pre-application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant. The applicant is cautioned that information contained In this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision makers (e.g. Hearing Examiner, Boards of Adjustment, Board of Public Works and City Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by the City or made by the applicant. The following comments concern utility and transportation development issues for the subject site: WATER 1. There is an existing 12" water main looping the existing facilities. 2. The modeled fire flow available at the site is approximately 4600 gpm. 3. The proposed project is located within the 3S0-water pressure zone. 4. The site is outside the Aquifer Protection Area. S. Any existing sub-standard hydrants will need to be replaced and/or retrofitted with a quick- disconnect Storz fitting. 6. A separate fire sprinkler permit wi1l be required. 7. City Code requires a System Development Charge (SDC) for any new development. This fee is based on the size of the water meter necessary to provide domestic water service to the site. A redevelopment credit for the site may offset any required SDC fee. 8. Additional information is necessary to comment on the proposed 6" "back-feed" waterline. SANITARY SEWER 1. An 8" public sewer line currently serves this property. 2. City Code requires a System Development Charge (SDC) for any new development. This fee is based on the size of the domestic water meter necessary to serve this site. And again, as with the water fee, the re-development credit for the site may offset any required SDC fee. .- -. .f Page 2 12/03/2003 SURFACE WATER I. Surface water conveyance facilities currently are serving this vicinity. Additional infrastructure maybe necessary if impervious surfaces are increased. Water quality facilities may also be necessary if new pollutant generating surfaces are added. 2. Surface Water facilities are required to be designed according to the requirements as set forth in the King County 1990 Surface Water Design manual. Alternative facilities can be considered through a Code Modification Alteration process. 3. Surface water System Development Charges are required for this site. This fee is based on new impervious surface added to the site (ifno new impervious surface is developed then no fee will be assessed). STREET IMPROVEMENTS I. The site is surrounded by fully improved roadway with curb, gutter, sidewalk and street lighting. Existing site ingress and egress is adequate. 2. A traffic mitigation fee of $75 per additional trip generated would be required for the site. The ITE 61h Addition provides a 16.78 trips per 1000 square-feet for Hospitals. G)i:N'~RAL COMMENTS I. Submittal of conceptual utility plans showing all existing and proposed utilities; including water mains, sewer mains, manholes, valves, hydrants, drainage facilities, drainage mains and catch basins is required for permit review. All existing utility easements on the site must also be shown on the site plan. A complete conceptual drainage plan, downstream analysis, and calculations for sizing the detention and water-quality treatment facilities will be required with the formal application of this project. If you have questions please call Mike Dotson, Plan Reviewer, at 425-430-7304. 2. Pennit application must include an itemized cost of constmction estimate for the utility and roadway improvements. The fee for review and inspection of these improvements is 5% of the first $100, 000 of the estimated cost; 4% of the next $100,000; and 3% of any additional cost. One-half of the fees are due upon permit application. 3. The applicant is responsible for any necessary private utility easements. C:\Plan Review\valley medical center expansion.doc - - o· . _ DATE: TO: FROM: MEMORANDUM \\-\~-o3 Construction Services, Fire Prevention, Plan Review, EONSP, Project Planner Neil Watts, Development Services Divi~ion Director SUBJECT: New Preliminary Application: '>f~ffie ~ ,], WiA c.%~~ LOCATION: L:\c>D ~ l\~tl ~ -:PREAPP NO. _~--'t-'to ___ -=-66~ ........... \ \>-.:::10 _____ -'---______ _ A meeting with the applicant has been scheduled for ~-~-O~ , Thursday, \ C> kJo.\ . , in one of the 6th floor oonfe.re ce rooms (new City Hall). If this meeting is scheduled at 10:00 AM; the MEETING MUST BE CONCLUDED PRIOR TO 11:00 AM to allow time to prepare for the 11:00 AM meeting. " . . Please review the-attached-project plans prior to the scheduled meeting with the applicant. You will not need to do a ~orough "permit lever review at this time. Note only major Issues that mustbe resolved priorto fonnalland use and/or building permit application submittal. . N'I . I... " Plan Reviewer assigned is _ ..... W..;...:...JIu.n4-Je_._\2'--___ _ Please submit your written comments to S. ~ d-iolo,. (Planner) at least two (2) days before the meeting. Thank you. , '. eg. H:\Division.s\DeveJop.ser\Dev & PJan.ing\TempJate\Preapp2 Revised 9/00 CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works MEMORANDUM DATE: December 4, 2003 TO: Pre-Application File No. 03-116 FROM: Susan Fiala, Senior Planner, x7382 SUBJECT: Valley Medical Center-Expansion General: We have completed a preliminary review of the pre-application for the above-referenced development proposal. The following comments on development and permitting issues are based on the pre-application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant and the codes in effect on the date of review. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision-makers (e.g., Hearing Examiner, Zoning Administrator, Board of Adjustment, Board of Public Works, and City CounCil). Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by City staff or made by the applicant. The applicant is encouraged to review all applicable sections of the Renton Municipal Code. The Development Regulations are available for purchase for $55.00, plus tax, from the Finance Division on the first floor of City Hall. Project Proposal: Tile subject project is located at the northwest corner of the intersection of Talbot Road South and S. 43rd Street. The overall site is the Valley Medical Center (VMC), the specific proposal is to enclose an existing courtyard (20,000 sq. fl. of area) to provide for additional space for the surgery department, admitting, gift shop and support. Tenant improvements to the interior are proposed to the 2nd and 3fd floors of the surgery department and to the 2nd floor of the Family Center. The overall project would include 125,000 square feet of expansion and renovation. Additionally, the proposal includes removing an existing heliport and constructing a 73 stall surface parking lot. A pedestrian bridge is also proposed to be constructed to connect the new parking lot area to the new entrance and drop-off area on the third floor. At the time of formal land use application, all building square footages must be clearly identified on the site plan and floor plans for the building area to be expanded versus renovated space. Zoning: The subject site is designated Commercial Office with a P suffix (CO-P) on the City's Zoning Map. The suffix "P" is a "public" designation of the site which requires additional notification when property ownerShip, use, or tenant changes take place. However, this requirement is not applicable to the current proposal because the use remains unchanged. Development Standards: TI1e project's compliance with the applicable development regulations is addressed below. Lot Coverage -The maximum lot coverage for buildings is 65% of the total lot area. For the formal land use application, the lot coverage for the expansion to the existing building on it respective lot is required to determine compliance. Building Height -The maximum building height Is 250 feel. Building elevations depicting the building height of the expansion must be submitted at the time of formal land use application. Parking -Parking regulations become applicable to existing land use applications when revisions are made to an approved site plan, and in this case, a building expansion and a new parking lot. 116_ VMCexpnnsion.doc - _. Valley Medical Center -Expansion Pre-Application Meeting Page 2 of 2 Parking standards require a specific number of off-street parking stalls based on the amount of square footage dedicated to certain uses. Recently, Valley Medical Center received approval for the conversion of a temporary parking lot into a permanent lot providing 137 new spaces (LUA 03- 091). Per that land use application, the applicant provided parking data for the Valley Medical Center campus. With the additional parking and building expansion, updated parking data will be required to be submitted at the time of formal land use application. In order to revise the amount of parking or percentage of compact spaces, a request for modifications to the parking requirements would be required to be submitted by the applicant with the formal land use application. The request would need to clearly demonstrate how the project provides a sufficient amount of spaces. Staff could not determine if the required number of ADA parking spaces are provided and the stall dimensions. Both items are to be provided at the time of formal land use application. The parking regulations specify that compact spaces, if proposed, are not to exceed 30% of the parking spaces provided or 40% of designated employee parking. Standard stall dimensions are required to be 9 feet x 20 feet and 8% feet x 16 feet for compact spaces. An aisle width of 24 feet is required for 90 degree parking stalls. ADA accessible stalls must be a minimum of 8 feet in width by 20 feet in length, with an adjacent access aisle of 8 feet in width for van accessible spaces. Landscaping -The CO zone requires a 10 foot wide landscape strip along the street frontage. If -not already existing, the proposed parking lot must provide this landscape strip along the S. 43rd SI. frontage. Parking preas exceeding 10,000 square feet in area are to provide a minimum of 5% of the parking area in landscaping to reduce the barren appearance of the lot. All landscaped areas must be a minimum width of 5 -feet within the parking areas and include an underground irrigation system. At the time of formal land use application submittal, a detailed landscape plan indicating the location, sizes and types of the plantings will be required. The site plan will need to provide data on the percentage and square footages of the parking area that is landscaped. Pedestrian Access -All development in the CO zone -is required to provide a direct and clear pedestrian connection from a public entrance to the street. The proposal would include a pedestrian bridge linking the new parking lot to the existing structure. The new entry 'plaza would _ provide sidewalks and pedestrian circulation to the new lobby. Existing sidewalks from the street appear to remain as existing. Screening/Refuse and Recyclables -Screening l1)ust be provided for all outside storage areas, as well as for surface-mounted and roof top utility and mechanical equipment. In addition, garbage dumpsters and recyclable areas must be screened pursuant to RMC section 4-4-090C7 (fence, landscaping, or combination of both). Permit Requirements: The project would be required to undergo Environmental (SEPA) Review and Administrative Site Plan Review. The size of the expansion is greater-than 4,000 square feet and thus above the SEPA threshold and would require Environmental Review. - The code (RMC 04-9-200.B.) states that all development designated as Commercial Office (CO) requires Site Plan Level 1 review. The proposed parking lot would be less than 300 parking stalls and would be less than 100,000 square feet of building area which are thresholds requiring a public hearing; thus administrative site plan review would be required. Both permits would be reviewed in an estimated timeframe of 6 to 8 weeks. The application fee for jOint land use applications is full price for the most expensive permit (Site Plan at $1,000) and half _off any subsequent permits ($200 which is % of full $400 fee for projects less than $100,000 or -$500 which is % of full $1,000 fee for projects valued at more than $100,000) for Environmental Review. In addition, first class postage ($0.37) per mailing label would be required for notification to surrounding property owners. Detailed information regarding the land use application submittal is provided in the attached handouts. // 116_ VMCexpansion.doc\ - - - J Valley Medical Center -Expansion Pre-Application Meeting Page 3 of 2 The applicant would also be required to apply for all applicable sign, building, electrical, plumbing permits and other relevant permits as required by the City of Renton's Construction Services Division. The review of these permits may occur concurrently with the review of the land use permits, but can not be issued prior to the completion of any required appeal periods. Fees: In addition to the applicable land use, building, construction and sign permit fees, the following mitigation fees will be required prior to the issuance of building permits: • A Transportation Mitigation Fee based on $75 per each new average daily trip attributable to the project; and • A Fire Mitigation Fee based on $0.52 per square foot of new construction. Additional Comments: In advance of submitting the full application package, applicants are strongly encouraged to bring in one copy of each application material for a pre-screening to the customer service counter to help ensure that the application is complete prior to making all copies. Furthermore, staff inquires to the removal of the heliport. If the heliport is removed and not relocated at this time and then at some future time the applicant would want to locate a new heliport, a conditional use permit would be required. cc: Jennifer Henning 116_ VMCexpansion.doc\ - Printed: 04-02-2004 Payment Made: LtTY OF RENTON 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Land Use Actions RECEIPT Permit#: LUA04-040 04/02/2004 02:33 PM Receipt Number: R0401660 Total Payment: 1,512.58 Payee: PUBLIC HOSPITAL DISTRICT #1 OF KING CO Current Payment Made to the Following Items: Trans Account Code Description 5010 000.345.81.00.0007 Environmental Review 5020 000.345.81.00.0017 Site Plan Approval 5955 000.05.519.90.42.1 Postage Payments made for this receipt Trans Method Description Amount Payment Check #2009980 1,512.58 Account Balances Amount 500.00 1,000.00 12.58 Trans Account Code Description Balance Due 3021 5006 5007 5008 5009 5010 5011 5012 5013 5014 5015 501.6 5017 501.8 5019 5020 5021 5022 5023 5024 5036 5909 5941 5954 5955 5998 303.000.00.345.85 000.345.81.00.0002 000.345.81.00.0003 000.345.81.00.0004 000.345.81.00.0006 000.345.81.00.0007 000.345.81.00.0008 000.345.81.00.0009 000.345.81.00.0010 000.345.81.00.0011 000.345.81.00.0012 000.345.81.00.0013 000.345.81.00.0014 000.345.81.00.0015 000.345.81.00.0016 000.345.81.00.0017 000.345.81.00.0018 000.345.81.00.0019 o 000.345.81.00.0024 000.345.81.00.0005 000.341.60.00.0024 000.341.50.00.0000 604.237.00.00.0000 000.05.519.90.42.1 000.231.70.00.0000 Park Mitigation Fee Annexation Fees Appeals/Waivers Binding Site/Short Plat Conditional Use Fees Environmental Review Prelim/Tentative Plat Final Plat PUD Grading & Filling Fees Lot Line Adjustment Mobile Home Parks Rezone Routine Vegetation Mgmt Shoreline Subst Dev Site Plan Approval Temp Use or Fence Review Variance Fees Conditional Approval Fee Comprehensive Plan Amend Booklets/ErS/Copies Maps (Taxable) Special Deposits Postage Tax .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 R gTYc0f' RENTON I:;:; E/VED APR 02 2004 BUILDING DIVISION '.-'. .... '. .. ... '., , . ~ .. "'" : .. {"'" .. ' ." .. ' , .' .:.'.. .. ~ ... ' .': "', ,'. " ~". ,.:.;\ : ~ .~'~' : .',. . .... ,. :::-: .<.~·\S·T:6.R'MWATER TECHN.LCA~ INFO~MATI..ON , . . Medical Center Surgery Expansion .• '. I Washington R CITY OF RENTON ECEIVED APR D 2 200~ BUILDING DIVISION • MAGNUSSON KLEMENCIC ASSOCIATES STORMWATER TECHNICAL INFORMATION Valley Medical Center Surgery Expansion Renton, Washington February 12, 2004 ......... --~ .. -., • MAGNUSSON KLEMENCIC ASSOCIATES 130 I Fifth Avenue, Suile 3200 Sealtle, Woshinglon 98101·2699 T: 206 292 1200 F: 206 292 1201 MAGNUSSON KLEMENCIC ASSOCIATES SLQRMW8IER3LCJJ~LLCAU.~.EnRM81I..o.~ ____________ _ Section I. Section II. Section III. Project Overview ...................................................................... . Preliminary Conditions Summary .................................................... .. Off-site Analysis ...................................................................... . 1 2 4 Section IV. Retention/Detention Analysis and Design............................................. 5 Section V. Conveyance System Analysis and Design............................................... 8 Section VI. Special Reports and Studies........................................................... 8 Section VII. Basin and Community Plan Areas...................................................... 8 Section VIII. Other Permits......................................................................... 8 Section IX. Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Analysis and Design................... 9 Section X. Bond Quantities Worksheet, Retention/Detention Facility Summary Sheet And Declaration of Covenant........................................................ 10 Section XI. Maintenance and Operations Manual.................................................. 1 0 8~~E~.D..L2CA:_E-'-GHRE.>J..S ___________________ _ 8~~E.~.D..DLB_:_D..R81.~AGLC..o.~TR.oL~LA~.S ___________ _ 8.~~END..IX.L.:_IJ_Y_D..R..QL.QG.I.cLALC1LLAll..o.~.S ___________ _ 8~~END..ILCD..:_c..o.~~~Y.8~..c.LCAL.C1LLAII..o.~.S ___________ _ AP-'~E~nl;LE:_D...O...W~_STREAM_C.o..~.D..LILQ~.s ____________ . 8~~E.t~W-'X-'~_:_MAI.~LIE.~A~..c.E_L.I.SJ..s _______________ _ . ii Valley Medical Center Surgery Expansion, Renton, Washington STORMWATER TECHNICAL INFORMATION I • MAGNUSSON KLEMENCIC ASSOCIATES MAGNUSSON KLEMENCIC ~SSOCIArr:S til .SECTIn.~~E.Rill_ECT~V£R.~'-I_E-W ______________ _ INTRODUCTION This report documents the stormwater and drainage design approach and proposal for the Valley Medical Surgery Center Expansion project. The report has been prepared concurrently with the Permit Submittal using the guidelines for the Stormwater Technical Information Report (TIR) from the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual. Figure 1 consists of the standard TIR worksheet, completed for the project. The project is located at the northeast quadrant of the interchange of State Route 167 and South 43rd Street in Renton, Washington (see Figure 2). The east side of the site abuts Talbot Road South. The City has indicated that the site is in the Panther Creek drainage basin. All of the improvements occur in previously developed areas. The proposed project consists of modifications to the existing hospital building, constructing approximately 0.5 acres of new vehicular parking at the existing helipad, and reconfiguring the vehicular access and pedestrian plaza at the main building entrance. EXISTING DRAINAGE The existing site land use is predominately buildings, parking lots, or streets. The existing site runoff can be characterized by two separate systems. On the south side of the site, offsite runoff enters the campus from South 43rd Street near the southwest corner of the site. This runoff is conveyed to the north in a 27-inch diameter trunk line running through the campus parking lots that ultimately discharges to an existing wetland just northwest of the campus (northwest of the Medical Arts Building) and east of the north entrance ramp to SR-167. Much of the on-site conveyance system for the west and south sides of the campus, which is made up of catch basins, area drains and roof drain connections, is connected to this trunk line. A small portion of the east campus (the south end of the east parking lot) also appears to join this trunk line just west of the Psychiatry Wing. There is one oil/water separator on the campus that appears to serve the parking lots on the south and east of the Medical Art Building. On the east side of the site, offsite runoff enters the campus from Talbot Road South just east of the Main Hospital Building. This runoff is conveyed to the north and northwest through the campus parking lots in 0 27-inch diameter trunk line thot also ultimately discharges to the existing wetland described above. Much of the on-site conveyonce system for the eost and north sides of the campus, which is made up of cotch basins, area drains, and roof drain connections, is connected to this trunk line. The wetlond described above is hydraulically connected to Panther Creek to the north and the entire campus falls within the Panther Creek Drainage Basin. PROPOSED DRAINAGE The proposed drainage system will collect stormwater runoff in new catch basins and convey stormwater to a new stormwater management vault where runoff will be detained and treated. The detention system will be located west of the new parking lot beneath the existing doctor's parking lot. To compensate for areas of improvements that cannot be drained to the stormwater management vault by gravity, the existing doctor's parking lot will be re-plumbed to drain into the vault. The stormwater vault will discharge to an existing storm drain manhole with a 12-inch discharge pipe to the existing conveyance system approximately 50 feet away. Stormwater T echnica I Information Valley Medical Center Surgery Expansion, Renton, Washington MAGNUSSON KLEMENCIC ASSOCIAIES r;) The proposed stormwater facility will not be able to capture all of the proposed new paved areas due to grading constraints. The detention calculations have compensated for these areas by detaining more volume of runoff from the parking lot than otherwise required. In a similar approach, the water quality treatment volume is sized to accommodate runoff from the existing doctor's parking lot in the capture area to compensate for those proposed areas that could not be routed to the facility. ~ELILQJ~LI-'-~' ~RELl.M.L~.ARY-.CilI'iQJTI.QN S S UMMARY'-______ _ SITE CONDITIONS Figure 3 shows the drainage basins analyzed for the project. The proposed improvements only affect the southern portion of the Valley Medical Hospital site. The basins'boundaries used as the limit of the drainage analysis and design were selected to include the project areas, and adjacent surfaces that would run into the project areas. The total area studied was 3.8 acres. Figure 4 shows the soils map for the area that was prepared by the Soil Conservation Service in the 1970s. The site soils are expected to have a relatively high runoff potential, since the pervious areas of the site are predominately lawn and landscaping previously modified from its natural state, underlain by stiff silts and clays. Some of the lawn areas by the main building entrance are constructed on the top of structure, limiting the ability of the lawn to infiltrate water into deeper soil horizons. Therefore, for the purposes of the drainage analysis, all of the soils were treated as belonging to Hydrologic Soil Group C, equivalent to glacial till soils. CORE REQUIREMENTS A pre-application meeting was attended by the owners, design team, and City staff on December 4, 2003, to identify the conditions for the project. The drainage conditions established for the project consist of applying the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual criteria for drainage design and stormwater management. Core Requirement #1: Discharge at the Natural Location The drainage from the improved areos will continue to drain to the existing storm drainoge conveyance system. The outfaillocotion for this system will not be chonged. Core Requirement #2: Off-Site AnalYSis A Levell Off-Site Analysis is included in this report. (are Requirement #3: Runoff Control Runoff control facilities have been designed for the project, and ore documented in this report. Core Req uirement #4: Conveyance System New conveyances have been designed to accommodate the 25-year design storm, and are documented in this report. Stormwater Technical Information Volley Medical Center Surgery Expansion, Renton, Washington Core Requirement #5: Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control (TESC) A TESC plan has been prepared for the project, and is documented in this report. Core Requirement #6: Maintenance and Operation MAGNUSSON KLEMENCIC ASSOCIAfES tjj This report addresses the maintenance and operation requirements for the proposed facilities. Special Requirement #1: Critical Drainage Areas Does not apply. Speciol Requirement #2: Compliance with on Existing Moster Drainage Plan Does not apply. Special Requirement #3: Conditions requiring a Moster Drainage Plan Project is below the thresholds. Special Requirement #4: Adopted Basin or Community Plans Does not apply. Special Requirement #5: Special Water Quality Controls Project is below the thresholds. Special Requirement #6: Coalescing Plate Oil/Water Separators Project is below the thresholds. Special Requirement #7: Closed Depressions Does not apply. Special Requirement #8: Use of Lakes, Wetlands, or Closed Depressions for Peak Rate Runoff Control The project does not propose to use existing features for peak rate runoff control. Special Requirement #9: Delineation of 100 Year Floodplain Does not apply. Special Requirement #10: Flood Protection Facilities for Type 1 and 2 Streams Does not apply. Stormwater Technical Information Valley Medical Center Surgery Expansion, Renton, Washington Spe(ial Requirement #11: Geote(hni(al Analysis and Report Not required for stormwater vaults. Special Requirement #12: Soils Analysis and Report MAGNUSSON KLEMENCIC ASSOCIM<S \Ill A Geotechnical report WClS prepared for the project. Based on the report, the existing site soils would have characteristics compatible with Hydrologic Soil Group C. ~KnQbLIJ_I.:---'lE~ITLA~ALY-.S_I_.>LS _____________ _ A Levell off-site analysis has been conducted for the project. The review is based on the record drawings for the site, observations made at the site, and resource maps from the City of Renton website. STUDY AREA DEFINITION AND MAPS A copy of the record drawing for the site is included. The record drawing shows the conveyances and flow path downstream of the work area. There are not any off-site areas upstream of the proposed improvements. The improvements are taking place at the upstream limit of one of the on-site conveyance systems. While off-site flows enter the Valley Medical site from City right-of-way, the off-site water does not flow through the project improvements. RESOURCE REVIEW No resource issues that would affect the proposed drainage improvements have been related to the designers by the owner or the City. FIELD INSPECTION The outfall of the existing storm drain conveyance system and downstream open channel reach serving the project area was observed at the site. The observed conditions are summarized below and in Appendix E. DRAINAGE SYSTEM DESCRIPTION AND PROBLEM SCREENING Stormwater discharge from the area of the improvements, including the proposed stormwater vault, will enter the existing 12-inch storm drain trunkline that flows west under the east-west drive that is between the hospital building and the existing heliport. From the discharge location of the project, flow heads west for about 220 feet before turning towards the north. After about 75 feet the pipe size increases to 27 inches. At this point, the discharge merges with flow from the southwest part of the Valley Medical Center site, which includes some off-site flow that is conveyed in 27 -inch pipe from the South 43rd Street right-of-way. From here, flow continues to flow through a total of about 700 feet of the 27 -inch pipe, then 110 feet of 42-inch pipe, until it discharges northwesterly into an open channel. The outfall is buried about 6 to 8 inches in sandy sediment. Additional sandy sediment has accumuloted in an area about 8 feet by 4 feet near the outfall. The first reach of open channel is flanked by a blackberry covered slope to the west and a flat meadow vegetated with reed canary grass Stormwater Technical Information Valley Medical Center Surgery Expansion, Renton, Washington MAGNUSSON KLEMENCIC ASSOCIAIES Cl on the east. The channel varies from 24 to 36 inches wide, 10 to 15 inches deep, with near vertical banks. Grass is growing on the sides and bottom of the channel in many areas. There were no signs of active bank erosion or bottom scour. This reach extends about 120 feet from the outfall. The channel then turns from northwesterly to north. At this point, a 15-inch knick point was observed in the channel bottom. Below this point, the channel bottom changes to more clayey material. The width was observed to vary from 15 to 24 inches, with depths of 8 to 15 inches and vertical banks. While the knick point indicates the channel bottom has eroded in the past, there were no signs of active erosion and the overbank areas were covered with low, herbaceous vegetation. This reach extends about 30 to 40 feet to the edge of the forest. Once the channel reaches the forest, another knick was observed where a buried log creates a 15-inch drop. Beyond this point, the channel flows through mature forest canopy and blackberry undergrowth. The channel width varies from 24 to 40 inches with vertical to 1 H: 1 V sloped banks. Woody debris was observed in the stream. The bottom substrate appeared to be mostly sand. The banks appeared stable, and there were not signs of active erosion aside from the aforementioned knick point. Due to the dense vegetation, this was the downstream limit of the off-site analysis. Figures 5 and 6 summarize the downstream conveyances. Appendix E has photos of the outfall and open channel. EXISTING SITE HYDROLOGY The existing site land covers consist of building rooftops, paved parking and walks, and lawn landscape areas. Building rooftops drain to the sanitary sewer system via the building mechanical systems. The other areas drain by surface sheet flow and gutter flow to catch basins and area drains. A 12-inch storm drain pipe serves as the trunkline for runoff collected in the project area. The existing basin is shown in Figure 3. The basin consists of 2.17 impervious acres and 1.63 acres of lawn and landscaping. The total area is 3.80 acres. The impervious runoff curve number is assumed to be 98, and the landscape runoff curve number is assumed to be 86. Subbasins were established within the larger study basin to facilitate the drainage analysis. Appendix ( has a detailed accounting of the pervious and impervious surfaces within each of the project subbasins. The site runoff was modeled using the Santa Barbara Urban Hydrograph method. The "Waterworks" software program by Engenious Systems was used to perform the modeling calculations. Data from the program are in Appendix C. The clesign storms were 24-hour events. Stormwater Technical Information Valley Medical (enter Surgery Expansion, Renton, Washington MAGNUSSON KLEMENCIC 1"SOCIAfE5 CJ The following table summarizes the rainfall totals used in the hydrologic analyses for the project. Design Storm Water quality, 24-hour Precipitation (inches) 0.67 2-year, 24-hour 2.00 1 O-year, 24-hour 2.90 25-year, 24-hour 3.38 1 OO-year, 24-hour 3.90 The flow rates computed for the existing site are as follows: Design Storm 2-year, 24-hour 1 O-year, 24-hour Existing Discharge (d5) 1.12 1.80 1 OO-year, 24-hour 2.58 All of the runoff from the proposed improvements drains to an existing 12-inch storm drain that does not receive flow from off-site. Therefore the off-site flows were not computed for this project. PROPOSED SITE HYDROLOGY The proposed site land covers consist of building rooftops, paved parking and walks, and landscape areas. Building rooftops drain to the sanitary sewer system via the building mechanical systems. The other areas drain by surface sheet flow and gutter flow to catch basins and area drains. A 12-inch storm drain pipe serves as the trunkline for runoff collected in the project area. Detention for the site was designed to meet the standard of the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual. The standard establishes that the post-developed flow rates for the site runoff from the 2-, 10-, and 1 OO-year design storms are not allowed to exceed the existing runoff rates from the 2-, 10-, and 1 OO-year storms, respectively. The proposed basin is shown in Figure 3. The total area is 3.85 acres, which is slightly more than the existing basin because conveyance improvements are proposed at the doctor's parking lot to collect runoff from outside the existing basin for treatment. This "diverted" catchment will eventually drain to the same storm drain trunk as in the existing condition, but will be treated first. The impervious runoff curve Stormwater T echnica I Information Valley Medical Center Surgery Expansion, Renton, Washington MAGNUSSON KLEMENCIC AS50CIAfcS III number is Clssumed to be 98, Clnd the pervious ICindscape runoff curve number is assumed to be 86. The proiect creates approximately 17,360 square feet of new impervious areas. All of the runoff from the proposed improvements drains to an existing 12-inch storm drain that does not receive flow from off-site. Therefore, the off-site flows were not computed for this proiect. The proposed improvements include installation of pipe and modifications to the existing drainage system that are needed to redirect runoff from the existing doctor's parking lot into the proposed stormwater vault. This "replumbing" is needed to meet the wClter quality treatment criteria for the proiect, but will affect the routing of runoff from the existing parking lot. Runoff from the new parking lot will be collected in catch basins and routed through pipes to the stormwater vault. HYDROLOGIC ANALYSIS The proposed site is ClnCllyzed as two bClsins based on whether the area is collected for treatment and detention in the proposed stormwClter vault. The bClsins are thus "detained" or "bypassed" by the proposed facilities. BClsins A Clnd 0, CiS shown in Figure 3, are "detCiined," Clnd BClsin B is "bypClssed." Detailed computations are provided in Appendix C. The flow rates computed for the proposed "bypass" basin are: Design Storm Proposed Discharge Ids) 2-year, 24-hour 0.87 1 O-year, 24-hour 1.37 1 OO-year, 24-hour 1.95 Assuming that the peaks from the "detained" and "bypass" bClsins occur at the same time, the Clilowable release rate for the stormwater detention vault was computed as the difference of the existi ng site discharge and the "bypass" site discharge: Design Storm 2-year, 24-hour 1 O-year, 24-hour 1 OO-year, 24-hour Stormwater Technical Information Vault Inflow Rate (ds) 0.40 0.61 0.86 Valley Medical Center Surgery Expansion, Renton, Washington Allowable Vault Release Rate (ds) 0.25 0.43 0.63 MAGNUSSON KLEMENCIC /,S50CIAlES III Based on the hydrologic routing calculations for the proposed stormwater vault about 1,140 d of detention storage would be required to meet the release standard. A 30 percent volume correction factor was applied to compute that the design detention volume is 1,480 d. WATER QUALITY TREATMENT The King County Surface Water Design Manual requires biofiltration of runoff when over 5,000 sf of new impervious area subject to vehicular use results from a project. City of Renton staff indicated verbally that when biofiltration is not feasible, a water quality vault may be substituted. In accordance with King County Special Requirement #5, Special Water Quality Controls are required for projects that result in more than 1 acre of new impervious area. As shown in the water quality computations in Appendix C, this project creates about 30,900 sf of new impervious surfaces subject to vehicular use. Therefore, Special Water Quality Controls are not required. Based on these criteria, the stormwater vault includes a permanent pool for water quality treatment. The design treatment volume was computed for a design storm where the precipitation was 0.67 inches, which is one-third of the 2-year, 24-hour rainfall. This volume is 1,550 d. RETENTION/DETENTION SYSTEM A stormwater vault is proposed for the project. The vault will include "live" detention storage and "permanent pool" volume for water quality treatment. The vault was designed in accordance with the City of Renton Standard Plan to the extent possible. Backup calculations and the detail drawing for the proposed detention vault are in Appendix C. Conveyance improvements were designed for the new parking lot and plaza area. The Rational Method was used to compute the peak intensity 25-year runoff rates, which were used to size the proposed storm drain pipes. Appendix D has the conveyance sizing calculations . .s£C.I_LQJ~I_\[L:--.-SJ=!_E£JALREenlu..s-AN D SIUD.L[S, ________ _ None. None. _S_E£TlnN---.YLIJ_~U:LEJLE.E-RMJJ->J.S ______________ _ None. Stormwater Technical Information Valley Medical Center Surgery Expansion, Renton, Washington MAGNUSSON KLEMENCIC 1,~SOCIAf~S t1 SECTION IX: TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL A~A1Y'-£I~~JLIlES_LG.N _________________ _ A TESC Plan has been prepared for the project, and is included in Appendix B. The plan meets the minimum TESC requirements as discussed below. TESC REQUIREMENTS TESC Requirement #1: Clearing limils Clearing limits are shown on the plans. TESC Requirement #2: Cover Measures Addressed in the TESC Plan Notes. TESC Requirement #3: Perimeter Protection A sediment retention barrier is shown on the plans. TESC Requirement #4: Traffic Area Stabilization The stabilized construction entrance is shown on the plans. The TESC Plan Notes indicate state water quality standards are applicable to construction site runoff. TESC Requirement #5: Sediment Retention A sediment retention system is shown on the plans. TESC Requirement #6: Surface Water Control Interceptor swales are shown on the pions. TESC Requirement #7: Dust Control Air quality is oddressed in the TESC Plan Notes. TESC Requirement #8: Wet Season Construction Addressed in the TESC Plan Notes. TESC Requirement #9: Construction within Sensitive Areas and Buffers Does not opply. TESC Requirement #10: Maintenance Addressed in the TESC Plan Notes. Stormwater Technical Information Valley Medical Center Surgery Expansion, Renton, Washington TESC Requirement #11: Final Stabilization Final stabilization will be in accordance with the landscape plans for the project. MAGNUSSON KLEMENCIC t\S soc lId E S f! SECTION X: BOND QUANTITIES WORKSHEET, RETENTION/DETENTION EACJLLLY~UMMARY~J:LEEJ-AtiD_DECLARA.TJ.QI~LQE C 0 ~E~AtiI ___ _ None . . £ECJJ.Q~_X.I_:_MA.I~TE~.A~LLA.tiILQJ~.ERA.TJ.Q~_~.A..~.llA.,--L ____ _ OPERATIONS The project provides a stormwater vault to treat and detain the runoff from the new parking lot and the existing doctor's parking lot. The stormwater is treated primarily by settling suspended pollutants in the quiescent flow within the permanent pool of the stormwater vault. The outlet device within the stormwater vault consists of a vertical standpipe fitted with orifices. The orifices have been designed to slow down the runoff, temporarily storing runoff in the vault until it can be released at the controlled rate. The operation of the vault is passive and controlled by gravity. There are no actions required on the part of the owner asides from maintaining the facility. MAINTENANCE The stormwater vault requires periodic inspection and cleaning to function properly. At a minimum, the facility should be inspected each year. When the depth of sediment in accumulated in the bottom exceeds 6 inches, the vault should be cleaned by removing the accumulated sediment. The vault should also be cleaned to remove floating debris, oil and grease, or accumulations of leaves. Access holes are provided at each end of the vault to allow inspections, cleaning, and repair. A drain is provided that can be opened to draw down the permanent pool of the vault -it is vital that this drain be closed once cleaning or inspections are completed. The vault is considered to be a confined space by state and local codes. Confined spaces present unique safety issues. Only personnel trained in confined space entry should work inside the vault. Catch basins and manholes also require periodic cleaning. This typically consists of using a vactor truck to remove accumulated sediments. Drainage structures should be cleaned when sediment accumulation reaches within 12 inches of the outlet pipe invert, or when pollutants are observed. Appendix F provides maintenance lists to be used for the proposed drainage facilities. Stormwater Technical Information 'T"_' ;-..."""-:-,>,, ,;:~-: , ...•• " : .. ,._ ........ ..-~ __ ...... ~~~ ... ~_ ... '-: -.,: --.~---:.,...:..~~ •• -:~ .::~ .. "........:...-• .>:-,,~. '.:.:~~ -••••• :. "', ,.:." -:: ,< 1.0 Valley Medical Center Surgery Expansion, Renton, Washington REFERENCES Volley Medical Center Surgery Site Improvements. GeoEngineers. January 16,2004. Surface Water Design Manual. King County Surface Water Management. 1990. MAGNUSSON KLEMENCIC AS~OCJAr~S fa Telephone Conversation with Ron Straka. City of Renton Stormwater Manager. December 2, 2003. Pre-Application Meeting with City of Renton Staff. December 4, 2003. Stormwater Technical Information Valley Medical Center Surgery Expansion, Renton, Washington APPENDIX A FIGURES • MAGNUSSON KLEMENCIC ASSOCIATES Page 1 of 2 King County Building and Land Development Division TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET P~RT.1 PflOJECT OWNER ~ND PftOJECT EtmlfiEER PART 2 PROJECT LOCATION A~D DESCRIPTION Project Owner -lL,J/~.J1.ftlif~J ~trle,... Address A OD S. ~~,. s.\. )J~_~",4o,., ctt,s Project Name V-AJ,.L.Et.{ ~_~-""'t---:4rne~F--=. __ Location SIl(.1""E..~"" i5Y~UI~/#N Township -=Z==-3_N--=--__ Phone Tr-~~HJA~'Z s . Z., 8 • ~+-?~, I Range -",5~S~ __ _ Project Engineer J~ ... tw 6"""","'-,=-, ___ _ Company _M~~lt~»OlLJ(J~hlln~_~!Q.,"'_'_. __ Address Phone -.l..O~~ Z ., Z ()() ~/e PART 3 'TVPE OF PERNlIT APPLlC~T'ON o Subdivision D Short Subdivision ~ Grading [=:1 Commercial o Other Section -",,~-,-I ___ _ Project Size 0.4 AC ~ Upstream Drainage Basin Size J.!JA AC __ PART 4 OTHER PERMITS 0 DOF/GHPA 0 Shoreline Management 0 CaE 404 0 Rockery 0 DOE Dam Safety 0 Structural Vaults 0 FEMA Floodplain 0 Other 0 CaE Wetlands 0 HPA PART 5 SITE COMMU~!TV AND DRAINAGE BASIN - Community C.l .f 1"') + --------"==-:/'-'-71 Dr I,e~ dn Drainage Basin PART 6 SITe CHARACTER!STIOS DRiver ___________ _ o Floodplain ____________ _ o Stream __________ _ o Wetlands --------------o Critical Stream Reach o Seeps/Springs o Depressions/Swales o High Groundwater Table o Lake -------____ _ o Steep Slopes o Groundwater Recharge 00 Other D_VE'u>pf#'f) Ho,,.,.r-4L-C4~PIIS o Lakeside/Erosion Hazard P~ftT 7 SOILS Soil TyPf I Slopes Udru1-1~J_ e~s,*. 3 H : 'V,.""". Erosion Potential fflDd~,.~te.. Erosive \lelocities Z oPp So o Additional Sheets AI1atched 1/90 Page 2 of 2 KIng County BuildIng and Land Development DIvIsIon TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET PAflT.B' D~VELOPMENT lIM!TA"fIONS REFERENCE L1MITATIONISITE CONSTRAINT o Ch. 4 -Downstream Analysis o o o o o o Additional Sheets Attatched P~flT. 9 ESC REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS ) DURING CONSTRUCTION ~ Sedimentation Facilities Ull . Stabilized Construction Entrance ~ Perimeter Runoff Control ~i Clearing and Grading Restrictions _ Cover Practices Construction Sequence o Other PAflT W' SURFAC~ WATE~ SYSTEM C! Grass Lined Channel o Tank ~ Pipe System I1r Vault 0 Open Channel o Energy Dissapator 0 Dry Pond o Wetland 0 Wet Pond o Stream Brief Description of System Operation CQ""htJUJd MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS FOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION Stabilize Exposed Surface Remove and Restore Temporary ESC Facilities Clean and Remove All Silt and Debris Ensure Operation of Permanent Facilities Flag Limits of NGPES Other 0 Infiltration Method of Analysis 0 Depression t;svl-/ 0 Flow Dispersal compensatiOnlMili~ation 0 Waiver' of Eliminated Site S orage o Regional Detention VJta+~ '41!A/,?t ~ I d~(I .f,'M t,&v/.k. Facility Related Site Limitations o Additional Sheets Attatched Reference Facility . . P~RT 1 ~ STR~CTURAL Af'lAL VSIS (May ,eqt,llre specIal structural review) Umitation o Cast in Place Vault CZI Other P,..e ... e~f-l- '10. v ,-I-t",- Storh'l W~+I" 00 Retaining Wall .rot" p~kt-t~ I" o Rockery> 4' High o Structural on Steep Slope I or a civil engineer under my supervision have visited the site. Actual site conditions as observed were Incorporated Into this worksheet and the attatchments. To the best of my knowledge the information provided here Is accurate. PART 12 EASEMENTSITRACTS o Drainage Easement o Access Easement o Native Growth Protection Easement o Tract D Olher 1,.90 I -.- PROJECT Valley Medical Center Surgery Expansion DATE 2-24-04 MAGNUSSON KLEMENCIC , TITLE Figure 2: Project Vicinity DRAWN BY ASSOCIATES SKETCH # Structural + Civil Engineers 130 I Fifth Avenue, Suite 3200 Seattle Washington 98 I 0 1-2699 T: 206 292 1200 F: 206 292 120 I W: www.mka.com :' . -~:: ~ " 't , ... • • 1\. .. /Il\k(~,\' ~II' . .1 SOIL LEGEND Th. fi,., copilot letl.r I, the inilkll one of ,h. ,all no ••. A ucond copilot leuo" A, B. C. 0, E. or F. indlco'" ,h. cia .. of ,loPi' Symbol .... hhOul 0 .10, .. te"ef Of. 'ho.e of neorly 1.",.1 .oil •. sYWBOL AgB Age AgO AkF AmB AmC An NAME Alderwood Qro ..... lly .andy loom, 0106 porco," ,lope. Alderwood gro",oll.,. .oody IOtlm, 6 to 15 PlICenl slope. Alderwood ora .... II.., .ondy loom, 15.0)0 porcon' ,lope. Aldorwood and K,ltop .oil., .... ,Y " •• p Aren". Aldotwood mol.rial,O 10 6 pelIcon' ,Iopo,' A,enl., Ald.rwood molerial. 6 10 15 porceru ,lope.' Aren". Evere" motorlol· see Seau,i'e 9ro..,.II.,. ,ondy lQ]m, 6 10 15 porconl ,101'" a..D Beau,lr. ;ro .... I1 .... ondy loom, 15 TO )0 peree"1 ,Iopt" B.F aoau,it. grow. II., ,ond.,. 100"'. 4010 75 pe'c.'" tlnr--. 8h Bellll"lQham ,II, loam af SrI.em ,il! loam Bu Buckl.y &11t loam Cb Co:nlal Beock.1 Eo Eatlmool lilt loom Ed Edg ..... ick fino landy loom EvB EII.r." 9fall.lly ,andy loam. 010 5 petrc.n. ,IO~I Eve Ev.r." 9'0 .... IIV land V loom, 510 15 p.rc.". Ilopo& fliD EII.r." groll.lly londy loam, IS 10 30 perc.nf ,Iope& E....c EII.r.II.Ald.~~ gro .... llv 10ndV looml, b '0 15 petrce". Ilope& InA Indianola loomv fli .. land. 0 to 4 perc en I Ilopu InC Indianola loamy fl .... land, 410 15 percent Ilopel InO Indianola loomv fl .... land, IS 10 30 perc::enl Ilope& KpB Kllsap II It loam, "} 10 B petC.nt ,Iope& KpC Klttap ,lit loam, 8 to 15 perCent ,lapel KpO Kiflop lib loam, IS to 30 perc.nt &Iopel K.e KloUI growliy loamy land. 6 10 15 perce"t .I~. Ma MI.ed alluvial land Nee N.II,on v.ry gro~.lIv loamv land. 2 to IS perc::enl Ilopel Ng H •• betg ,lit loam Nk Nooklock lilt loam No Nor,..., land., loam RoC RoD Rde RdE R. Rh So Sh Sk Sno 50 So 50' s.. O'eo. peat Orldlo ,III loom eNoll gro .... lly loam. 0 to 15 percent ,lapel Otoll grow!!y 100", 151025 pttfce"' .Iopel OvollgrQvelly loam. 40 to 7S perc."r .Ioperl Pllchuck loam., fiN land Pilchuck fine londy loom PuQ., .Ilty cloV loom Pu.,ollup fiN landy loom ROQnot fine londy loom, 6 10 15 percent • lop .. RognQr fine tandy loom, 15 to 2S perc."t Ilope& Rognar·lndlanolo o •• oc 101 ian, .Ioplnv • Rogncw.lndhJnola alloc:lollan. mod_ate I.,. I,.ep· R.nton lilt loom Rlverwolh Salol ,lit loom Samf'l'l1ml,h .11t loam SeaM" muck She Icar muck 51 lilt loom Snahoml,h lilt Iclleu_ Snahoml,h 'Ih loal'll, thick surface vorlant Sultan lilt loom Tu Tukwila muck Urban land Wo Woodinvili. ,lit loam • The c:ompO'Iillan of ,he .. uni'l il more variabl. lhon 'hoi of 'he olheort In ,he Qt'ea. but it hat be.n canfralled well enouvh 10 interpret fOf ,h • .. peered .., .. of the loil •. j i -~ .. J So IZ-S MAP I" Ii. \'- \ .. . r ::::;-L 1'( OFF-SITE ANALYSIS DRAINAGE SYSTEM TABLE Surface Water Design Manual, Core Requirement #2 Basin: VA-L-L-b't MBc:>Il.4-L Subbasin Name: ~vfZ.I.X:::f(,'1 [;~~,,~,"IJ P~rSubbasin Number: open I. ~ --z. 0 ' tiJ.tJe , -Zl,O~ 't~5'~~/O S I 1,'0!7~ I,~ZS I. ZS llT able .doc 1 112192 Design Sheet ---------- d J '" MAGNUSSON KLEMENCIC ,\, S soc 11\ r I: S • Structural < Civil Engineer! lrI .. ' ~ --------------------- APPENDIX B DRAINAGE CONTROL PLANS • MAGNUSSON KLEMENCIC ASSOCIATES , t t r Ii I APPENDIX C HYDROLOGIC CALCULATIONS • MAGNUSSON KLEMENCIC ASSOCIATES Valley Medical Center Surgery Expansion Site Hydrologic Characterization Assumptions: 1. Soils are till, or equivalent, SCS Hydrologic 5011 Group (HSG) C 2. Established lawn areas located on top of burled structures are hydrologically equivalent to liII soils (HSG C). 3. King County 1990 Surface Water Design Manual criteria apply to this project. Existing Site Areas Basin A (vicinity of hellpad) Total area: 34,860 sf 21,039 sf 13,821 sf Till lawn: Impervious Basin B (vicinity of courtyard & tountaln) Total area: 112,203 sf Till lawn: 45,810 sf Impervious 66,393 sf Basin D (existing doctor's parking lot) Total area: 18,356 sf Till lawn: 4,104 sf Impervious 14,252 sf Total site area analyzed for proJect: Till lawn: 70,953 sf Impervious 94,466 sf Proposed Site Areas: Areas draining to detention facility: Basin A (vicinity of hellpad, north) Total area: 29,084 sl Till lawn: 6922 sf Impervious 22,162 sf Basin D (existing doctor's parking lot) Total area: 20,456 sf Till lawn: 5,054 sf Impervious 15.402 sf Subtotal for det.iwater quality vault: Till lawn: 11 ,976 sf Impervious 37,564 sf O.BOO acres 0.483 acres 0.317 acres 2.576 acres 1.052 acres 1.524 acres 0.421 acres 0.094 acres 0.327 acres 165,419 sl 1.629 acres 2.169 acres 0.668 acres 0.159 acres 0.509 acres 0.470 acres 0.116 acres 0.354 acres 49,540 sl 0.275 acres 0.862 acres Areas discharging downstream of detention (bypass areas): Basin B (vicinity of courtyard & fountain) Total area: 117,979 sf Till lawn: 41590 sf Impervious 76,389 sf Subtotal for bypass area: 2.708 acres 0.955 acres 1.754 acres 117,979 sl Till lawn: 41,590 sf 0.955 acres Impervious 76,389 sf 1.754 acres 3.797 acres 1.137 acres 2.708 acres Total site area affected by project: 167,519 sf 3.846 acres Net change In overall total area: 1:IVMCSurgeryCIvtStormwaterl{aTeas.xlsjSD aTeas Feb04 TlR Magnusson Klemenclc Associates Prepared by BL T Primed: 211012004 2,100 sf, added at doctor's parking lot. \ I Design Sheet .,--. MAGNUSSON KLEMENCIC I ASSOCIATES • Structural + Civil Engineors ... ; PROJECT Vp.r/e.J Mo} CIJ~ S ~, (;~/) SHEEI/I, DAlE ]JZ--f/~J# BY ¥J,-r v lOCATION i2;II~" VIA-ClIENI AlB g:r b. :r ~ =: :rAf'~f -I4 eodT' .-.~, .. :: 2'Z J b Z sC -J '3 ~ z I s. r -= i:l4/ s ~ Arl1 =: 765g~-66~~~ -= qqo,6s~ " .. , . ...... __ . Design Sheet· PROJECT lOCATION I ··-1 CLIENT OATE 0.].'11"" ,., - Qf6'f,-' -- O'm'r' = ·Ov::: 0.40 cJs. Q,d': 0,61 c;c; Q/Dd ~ "·9th vt~ ;" I I MAGNUSSON KLEMENCIC ASSOCIATES ----.--. Structural + Civil Engineen SHEET BY J. I Z "r:s J. ~O 0(., Z.5'3 D-~> AlIo~J,I.e ~/~A76 ~ Q. ~/eA$e ~ Q q~~t -Q''1ftU~ Q~/'2 -::: 0,25 cJ> Orel,/o ':: <:> ,4/5 of$ f"I I ':-f), 6 '7 f'_ U',e I /tld ,7 Of? Design Sheet .1 MAGNUSSON KLEMENCIC I -.----ASSOCIATES • Structural + Civil Engineer. PROJECT VCtl/oi M~ ~""!J:r-l ~O::.rJJ-IIM<;"·"tr-'I'Y-______ SH_EET _____ --j LOCATION ~lh'L \JV/t ~~J) DATE -rjll/tJ4-BY 11"'1' ,. ! 'I • ! • I I I , ! I -._ l- .' ~ell~d + pPV"~~ lof :: Zz 16 2. sf.. L Ir, f'fV>l ~/n 4 ) 1)..1ve-~...-1 p~.,.p rOod -:. > -, 4-5' .> f. L' J.; p~ f" Ix-S'II B) -ro~ I L\ CAr61 rA ~v},JPrA ~ V6h~~. ~ ';. ~q34-5?' ! 1 De~~11 kI~ Of~ ~4) • 'BCt$orl1.A = "Z-z16'ZsC -gc.5-1I1 1> (JI1~'S P ~-'):; I') 4D L.. ~ ~ i' Des '71'1; 1.41(; ~r '1(/,,/. +rf;f,1~fJf\f. "'~ ;-!> 15' 6 1 $( \JJOtk Q~('H -r;. ~ +"" p/) + V~JI+ S : r.:Il, Per" 10,'10 /lc..swDkf ) -VW4~ ~I) v&llJh)e t1 { ;-U1/J r r: fr.t>~ 5~ 'It, 'f -II,'lCP"tyr ...." fJ r(.&, ~ F;.Oh\ \.J~ ~t'~,L.. s· \f. -:: ~jC.c 1,47 c( --- II C4 KIN G C 0 U N T Y. WAS II I N G TON. SUR F ACE W ATE ROE S I G N MAN U A L FIGURE 3.S.1C 2·YEAR 24·IiOUR ISOPLUYIALS \"0_0_,- \ '\ 1.~ l~ '0 1."-tIJ 1., \ 2Q --~iIIt""T-<$ It: \ 2-VEAR 24-HOUR PRECIPITATION __ 3.4""" ISOPLUVIALS OF 2·YEAR 24·HOUR TOTAL PRECIPITATION IN INCHES L-____________ . _________ _ o I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Mile, i_ I: 300,000 --.....--3~ 3.5.1-8 KIN G C 0 U N T Y. WAS H I N G TON. SUR F ACE W ATE R DES I G N MAN U A L . 33 FIGURE 3.S.1E to-YEAR 14-HOUR ISOPLUVIALS 2.1 22 23 10-VEAR 24-HOUR PRECIPITATION ,. 3.4---ISOPLUVIALS OF 1D-YEAR 24-HOUR TOTAL PRECIPITATION IN INCHES o ) 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Miles ---): 300,000 3.5.1-\0 1/90 ( KIN a C 0 U N T Y. WAS H I N G TON. SUR F ACE W ATE ROE S I G N MAN U A L FIGURE 3.5.11-1 IOO-YEAR 24-I-IOUR ISOPLUVIALS lIP-YEAR 24-HOU R PRECIPll AllON "4 -ISOPLUVIALS OF 1QO.YEAR 24-HOUR TOTAL PRECIPITATION IN INCHES a 1 2 J 4 5 6 7 8 Millis I: JOO,OOO 3.5.1-13 Gi 1/90 2/11/04 10:50:11 am Skilling Ward Magnusson Barkshire page 1 '.'/;,' , Valley Medical Cntr. Surgery Expansion Stormwater>pesign per 1990 KCSWDM stds February, 2,:09,~ Technical Information Rpt. ===================================================================== .::. I~ • ;.. BASIN SUMMARY NAME: proposed bypass basin 10-yr 2.71 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs TYPE1A PERV 2.90 inches AREA .. : 0.96 Acres 10.00 ABSTRACTION,;'COEFF: 0 .20 TcReach -·~h~~t L: 110.00 TcReach -"Channel L: 100.00 TcReach -Channel L: 260.00 PEAK RATE ::::0",1.37 cf s VOL: min CN .... : 86.00 TC .... : 8.26 min ns:0.1500 p2yr: 2.00 kc:27.00 s:0.0200 kC:42.00 s:0.0100 s:0.1090 0.52 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min BASIN ID: bp_100 SBUH METHODqLOGY NAME: proposed bypass basin 100-yr TOTAL AR~~,:~ ' ..... : RAINFALL TyPE .... : PRECI PITATION, .... : TIME INTERVAL .... : 2.71 Acres TYPE1A 3.90 inches 10.00 min BASEFLOWS: AREA .. : CN .... : TC .... : 0.00 cfs PERV 0.96 Acres 86.00 8.26 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 TcReach -Sheet L: 110.00 TcReach -Channel L: 100.00 TcReach -Channel L: 260.00 PEAK RATE:' 1. 95 cfs VOL: ns:0.1500 p2yr: 2.00 kc:27.00 s:0.0200 kc:42.00 s:0.0100 s:0.1090 0.73 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min BASIN ID: bp',2 SBUH METHODOLOGY NAME: proposed bypass basin 2-yr TOTAL AREA ....... : RAINFALL TyPE .... : PRECIPITATION .... : TIME INTERV~ .... : 2.71 Acres TYPE1A 2.00 inches 10.00 min BASEFLOWS: AREA .. : CN .... : TC .... : 0.00 cfs PERV 0.96 Acres 86.00 8.26 min ABSTRACTION'COEFF: 0.20 TcReach -She'et L: 110.00 TcReach -Channel L: 100.00 TcReach -Channel L: 260.00 PEAK RATE: ',0.87 cfs VOL: ns:0.1500 p2yr: 2.00 kc:27.00 s:0.0200 kC:42.00 s:0.0100 s:0.1090 0.33 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min IMP 1.75 Acres 98.00 5.00 min IMP 1.75 Acres 98.00 5.00 min IMP 1.75 Acres 98.00 5.00 min 2/11/04 10:50:11 am Skilling Ward Magnusson Barkshire Valley Medical Cntr. Surgery Expansion Stormwater Design per 1990 KCSWDM stds February 2004 Technical Information Rpt. page 2 ===================================================================== BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: det 10 SBUH METHODOLOGY NAME: proposed detained basin 10-yr TOTAL AREA ....... : RAINFALL TYPE .... : PRECIPITATION .... : TIME INTERVAL .... : 1.14 Acres TYPEIA 2.90 inches 10.00 min BASEFLOWS: AREA .. : CN .... : 0.00 cfs PERV 0.28 Acres 86.00 ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 TcReach -Sheet L: 110.00 TcReach -Channel L: 100.00 TcReach -Channel L: 260.00 PEAK RATE: 0.61 cfs VOL: TC .... : 5.00 min ns:0.1500 p2yr: 2.00 kc:27.00 s:0.0200 kc:42.00 s:0.0100 0.23 Ac-ft TIME: s:0.1090 480 min BASIN ID: det 100 SBUH METHODOLOGY NAME: proposed detained basin 100-yr TOTAL AREA ....... : 1.14 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE .... : TYPEIA PERV PRECIPITATION .... : 3.90 inches AREA .. : 0.28 Acres TIME INTERVAL .... : 10.00 ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 TcReach -Sheet L: 110.00 TcReach -Channel L: 100.00 TcReach -Channel L: 260.00 PEAK RATE: 0.86 cfs VOL: min CN .... : 86.00 TC .... : 5.00 min ns:0.1500 p2yr: 2.00 kC:27.00 s:0.0200 kC:42.00 s:0.0100 s:0.1090 0.32 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min BASIN ID: det 2 SBUH METHODOLOGY NAME: proposed detained basin 2-yr TOTAL AREA ....... : RAINFALL TYPE .... : PRECIPITATION .... : TIME INTERVAL .... : 1.14 Acres TYPE1A 2.00 inches 10.00 min BASEFLOWS: AREA .. : CN .... : TC .... : 0.00 cfs PERV 0.28 Acres 86.00 5.00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 TcReach -Sheet L: 110.00 TcReach -Channel L: 100.00 TcReach -Channel L: 260.00 PEAK RATE: 0.40 cfs VOL: ns:0.1500 p2yr: 2.00 kc:27.00 s:0.0200 kC:42.00 s:0.0100 s:0.1090 0.15 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min IMP 0.86 Acres 98.00 5.00 min IMP 0.86 Acres 98.00 5.00 min IMP 0.86 Acres 98.00 5.00 min 2/11/04 10:50:11 am Sk~lling Ward Magnusson Barkshire Valley Medical Cntr. Surgery Expansion Stormwater Design per 1990 KCSWDM stds February 2004 Technical Information Rpt. page 3 ===================================================================== BASIN ID: det_wq SBUR METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA ....... : RAINFALL TYPE .... : PRECIPITATION .... : TIME INTERVAL .... : ABSTRACTION COEFF: TcReach -Sheet L: TcReach -Channel L: TcReach -Channel L: PEAK RATE: 0.10 cfs BASIN ID: tot e10 SBUR METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA ....... : RAINFALL TyPE .... : PRECIPITATION .... : TIME INTERVAL .... : ABSTRACTION COEFF: TcReach -Sheet TcReach -Sheet L: L: TcReach -Shallow L: TcReach -Shallow TcReach -Channel PEAK RATE: 1. 80 BASIN ID: tot e100 SBUR METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA ....... : RAINFALL TYPE .... : PRECIPITATION .... : TIME INTERVAL .... : ABSTRACTION COEFF: L: L: cfs TcReach -Sheet L: TcReach -Sheet L: TcReach -Shallow L: TcReach -Shallow L: TcReach -Channel L: PEAK RATE: 2.58 cfs BASIN SUMMARY NAME: prop detained basin·water qual 1.14 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs TYPE1A PERV 0.67 inches AREA .. : 0.28 Acres 10.00 min CN .... : 86.00 TC .... : 5.00 min 0.20 110.00 ns:0.1500 p2yr: 2.00 s:0.1090 100.00 kc:27.00 s:0.0200 260.00 kC:42.00 s:0.0100 VOL: 0.04 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min ( J 5 4 1 G (:. (('0''''' SG-I"e~) NAME: total existing 10-yr 3.80 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs TYPE1A PERV 2.90 inches AREA .. : 1. 63 Acres 10.00 0.20 225.00 75.00 75.00 70.00 75.00 VOL: min CN .... : 86.00 TC .... : 14.42 min ns:0.1S00 p2yr: 2.00 ns:0.0110 p2yr: 2.00 ks:27.00 s:0.0150 ks:27.00 s:0.0100 kc:42.00 s:0.0200 0.70 Ac-ft TIME: s:0.1090 s:0.01S0 480 min NAME: total existing 100-yr 3.80 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs TYPE1A PERV 3.90 inches AREA .. : 1. 63 Acres 10.00 0.20 225.00 75.00 75.00 70.00 75.00 VOL: min CN .... : 86.00 TC .... : 14.42 min ns:0.1S00 p2yr: 2.00 ns:0.0110 p2yr: 2.00 ks:27.00 s:0.01S0 ks:27.00 s:0.0100 kC:42.00 s:0.0200 1.00 Ac-ft TIME: s:0.1090 s:0.01S0 480 min IMP 0.86 Acres 98.00 5.00 min IMP 2.17 Acres 98.00 5.00 min IMP 2.17 Acres 98.00 5.00 min CIO 2/11/04 10:50:11 am Skilling Ward Magnusson Barkshire Valley Medical Cntr. Surgery Expansion Stormwater Design per 1990 KCSWDM stds February 2004 Technical Information Rpt. page 4 ===================================================================== BASIN ID: tot e2 SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA ....... : RAINFALL TYPE .... : PRECIPITATION .... : TIME INTERVAL .... : ABSTRACTION COEFF: TcReach -Sheet L: TcReach -Sheet L: TcReach -Shallow L: TcReach -Shallow L: TcReach -Channel L: PEAK RATE: 1.12 cfs BAS IN SUMMARY NAME: total existing 2-yr 3.80 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs TYPE1A PERV 2.00 inches AREA .. : 1. 63 Acres 10.00 0.20 225.00 75.00 75.00 70.00 75.00 VOL: min CN .... : 86.00 TC .... : 14.42 min ns:0.1500 p2yr: 2.00 ns:0.0110 p2yr: 2.00 ks:27.00 s:0.0150 ks:27.00 s:0.0100 kC:42.00 s:0.0200 0.44 Ac-ft TIME: s:0.1090 s:0.0150 480 min IMP 2.17 Acres 98.00 5.00 min CI I 2/11/04 10:50:11 am Skilling Ward Magnusson Barkshire Valley Medical Cntr. Surgery Expansion Stormwater Design per 1990 KCSWDM stds February 2004 Technical Information Rpt. page 5 ===================================================================== STORAGE STRUCTURE LIST RECTANGULAR VAULT ID No. detvault Description: Detention vault Length: 25.40 ft. Width: 10.00 ft. voids: 1. 000 ell.. 2/11/04 10:50:11 am Skilling Ward Magnusson Barkshire Valley Medical Cntr. Surgery Expansion Stormwater Design per 1990 KCSWDM stds February 2004 Technical Information Rpt. page 6 ===================================================================== DISCHARGE STRUCTURE LIST MULTIPLE ORIFICE ID No. detvault Description: detention vault Outlet Elev: 82.00 Elev: 82.00 ft Elev: 84.10 ft ~lev: 85.35 ft Orifice Diameter: Orifice 2 Diameter: Orifice 3 Diameter: 2.6250 in. 1. 8750 in. 1.7500 in. Adj v5+ ,v}Je} elN (2 efJJre~ '. F'"i :J ..fo,., .{/ovV deprf,. 4,4,74 Jt..;f'// cp. 5\,AJDJ!1 Project Description Project File Worksheet Flow Element Method Solve For Input Data untitled. 1m2 VMC Det Vault Outlet Pipe Circular Channel Manning's Formula Channel Depth Mannlngs Coefficient 0.012 Channel Slope 0.020000 fIIlt Diameter 12.00 In Dlscharae 0.23 cIs k-J '3? 00 -0·,4- Results @ OJf/o+-el. ad 'cb :: . Depth It ) ~ ~ ~ /. 9G f.J. Flow Area . 7 112 Wetted Perimeter 0.77 It Top Width 0.69 It Critical Depth 0.20 It Percent Full 14.00 Critical Slope 0.0049331Uft Velocity 3.44 ftls Velocity Head 0.18 It Specific Energy 0.32 II Froude Number 1.96 Maximum Discharge 5.87 cIs .: Full Flow Capacity 5.46 cIs Full Flow Slope 0.000036 111ft Flow Is supercrltlcal. ,G'13 .':".~:" "-;' : .. ".j " 'I." ;."~ ' . • , ~~ t." ~ : -f"',:' "\, f ,:t r ~ ~. " • .. " .. t.' ~ "" : I i ' i' MATCH INFLOW -STO--OIS-<-PEAK-> STORAGE (eEa) (efs) --id---id-<-STAGE> id VOL (ef) 470.19 cf 798.41 ef page 7 CI4 SInIdUral + Civil Engl,,"" 1301 fifth A""nue, Suite 3200 *"Ie Washington 98101-2699 T: 206 292 1200 f: 2062921201 W: www,mka,cam PAGE 1 1 '. ROUTING JMS RMG PLACED CALL: 181 MKA o Other Company Phone # 425·430·7304 DATE 12/2/03 TIME 3:30 PM BETWEEN Brian Taylor OF MAGNUSSON KLEMENCICASSOCIATES, INC. AND Ron Straka, OF City of Renton, Surface Water Manager PROJECT yMc....YfjtS Surg Expansion SURJECT Stormwater Treatment Contacted Ron to discuss water quality treatment design in advance of pre·app meeting scheduled for 12/4/03. Ron indicated that in general Stormfilter™ devices are not permitted in the City unless there is an extreme design condition. Example was high.groundwater making construction of a water quality vault impossible. City's reason is that there is insufficient history to determine efficacy of Stormfilter™ devices. The City will consider a request if it is submitted as defined'in the Code Modification and Alteration request. Procedures are in the Municipal Code. Documentation must be submitted to show that the device provides the same benefit as a design per code would provide. Ron discussed how we could meet the 1990 Surface Water Design Manual criteria. For projects that cannot provide biofiltration, the City will accept a water quality vault in lieu of the swale, sized per the 1990 manual criteria., For projects that add more than 1.0 acre of new impervious surface subject to vehicular traffic, Special Requirement #5 kicks in. If a swale is not provided, tile vault used to meet SR#5 must be sized at 150% of the size required in' the manual; 'The water quality treatment volume (without the 150% factor) is the runoff volume from a storm 1/3 the size of the -2-year event. (P wq = P2/3). , , . I explained that a Stormfilter™ provides greater flexibility to the owner, because is has a reduced footprint that is less likely to impede future parking garage construction, and cartridges can be added to a Stormfilter™ to increase the treqtment capacity if needed in the future. I also explained how the hydraulic head limitations would make it difficult to site a combined detention/water quality facility at the existing parking lot location. Ron clarified that the helipad should be considered new impervious area subject to vehicular traffic, He also indicated that since a wetland is downstream, SR#5 may apply even if the new imperviousness is beneath the 1.0 acre threshold. At the end of the conversation Ron indicated that he would likely be open to a Stormfilter1M for this project. indicated I would double-check the 1990 sizing criteria to discuss further at the pre-app meeting. CIS l APPENDIX D CONVEYANCE CALCULATIONS I • MAGNUSSON KLEMENCIC ASSOCIATES , I', \.-.' Design Sheet· n LOCATION 'i2.e,,-k;'1 -viA' CLIENT N 'g14'j'" SHEET MAGNUSSON KLEMENCIC I ASSOCIATES • Structural + Civil Engineers / .--.~--- I ~_ .• h z~ :: CJ. c,~ per J'.GSwbM Iqq,,~ AREA # ACRES C I Q 1 0.069 0.15 2.71 0.028 2 0.069 0.15 2.71 0.028 3 0.068 0.9 2.71 0.166 4 0.016 0.9 2.71 0.039 5 0.257 0.9 2.71 0.627 6 0.229 0.9 2.71 0.559 7 0.092 0.9 2.71 0.224 8 0.015 0.9 2.71 0.037 9 0.002 0.9 2.71 0.005 10 0.04 0.9 2.71 0.098 11 0.016 0.15 2.71 0.007 12 0.333 0.15 2.71 0.135 APPENDIX E DOWNSTREAM CONDITIONS • MAGNUSSON KLEMENCIC ASSOCIATES Design Sheet n PROJECT VMc,-5v..,. LOCATION I!.~ \'vA ClIEN! JJ8S71 . "". 0) MAGNUSSON I KLEMENCIC ASSOCIATES • Structural + Civil Engineer. sum , / DATE Z/rZ/of' BY!JJ..T' • -r-( N , () , ..... • ~ . I , I . I ; I I \ "":"~ Basin: VA-L-&..J:;'f MB£>'~L apt" I' .hll."""'. Z 1- opetl ., • (;) I w.*-J.z. -&. OFF-SITE ANALYSIS DRAINAGE SYSTEM TABLE Surface Water Design Manual, Core Requirement #2 Subbasin Name: ~vfl.IX::ft.'1 E;("',,~,~IJ P~rsubbasin Number: lHable.doc 1112192 VALLEY MEDICAL SURGERY EXPANSION: STORM DRAIN TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT OUTFALL OF 42-IN STORM PIPE CHANNEL APPROX. 30 FT. FROM OUTFALL CHANNEL APPROX. 120 FT FROM OUTFALL VALLEY MEDICAL SURGERY EXPANSION: STORM DRAIN TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT CHANNEL WI CLAYEY BOnOM 140 FT FROM OUTFALL . "!J ............... ".... TRANSITION TO CHANNEL THROUGH FOREST APPENDIX F MAINTENANCE LISTS --------------- I .----. MAGNUSSON KLEMENCIC ASSOCIATES KIN G C 0 U N T Y, WAS H I N G TON, SUR F ACE W ATE R DES I G N MAN U A L NO.3 -CLOSED DETENTION SYSTEMS (PIPESjTANKS) Maintenance Component Storage Aloa Manhole Catch Basins Defect Plugged AJr Vonts Debris and Sedlmont Joints Betweon Tank/Pipe Section Tank/Pipe Bent Out of Shape Cover not In Place locking Mechanism Not Working Cover Difficult to Remove Ladder Rungs Unsafe Condltlonl When Maintenance II Needed One·half of the cross section of a vent is blockod at any point with debris and sediment. . Accumulated sodlment depth exceeds 10% of tho diameter 01 the storage area lor 1/2 length of storage vault or any point depth exceeds 15% of diameter. Example: 12·lnch storage tank would require cleaning when sediment reaches depth of 1 Inches for more than 1/2 length of tank. Ally crack allowing material to be transported Into facility. Ally part of tank/pipe Is bent out of shape more than 10% of Its design shape. Cover Is missing or only partially In place. Ally open manhole requires maintenance. Mechanism cannot be opened by one maintenance person with proper tools. Bolts Into frame have less than 1/2 Inch of thread (may not apply to self·locklng lids). Ono maintenance person cannot remove lid after applying 80 pounds of 11ft. Intent is to keep cover from sealing off access to maintenance. KIng County Safety Office and/or maintenance person Judges that ladder Is unsafe due to missing rungs, misalignment, rust, or cracks. See 'Catch Basins' Standard No.5 A·3 Relultl Expected When Maintenance II Performed Vents free 01 debris and sediment. AJI sediment and debris removed from storage area. AJI Joints between tank/pipe sections are BOaled. Tank/pipe repaired or replaced to design. Manhole Is cloBOd. Mechanism opens with proper tools. Cover can be removed and reinstalled by one maintenance person. Ladder meets design standards and allows maintenance persons safe access. See 'Catch Basins' Standard NO.5 1/90 KIN G C 0 U N T Y, WAS H I N G TON, SUR F ACE W ATE R DES I G N MAN U A L NO.4 -CONTROL STRUCTURE/FLOW RESTRICTOR Maintenance Component General Cleanout Gate Orifice Plate Overflow Pipe Manhole Calch Basin Defect Trash and Debris (Includes Sediment) Structural Damage Damaged or Mlaslng Damaged or Mlaslng Obstructions Obstructions Condltlon. When Maintenance II Needed Distance between debris bulld·up and boHom of orifice plale Is less than 1-1/2 feet .. Structure Is nOI securely aHached to manhole wall and outlet pipe structure should support at least 1.000 pounds of up or down pressure. . Structure Is not in upright position (allow up to 10% from plumb). Connections to outlet pipe are not watertight and show signs of rust. AIIv holes -other than designed holes - In the Btructure. Cleanout gate Is not watertight or is mlasing. Gate cannot be moved up and down by one maintenance person. Chain leading 10 gale Is missing or damaged. Gate Is rusted over 50% of its surface area. Control device Is not working properly due to missing, out of place, or bent orifice plate. Ally trash, debrlB, Bedlment, or vegetation blocking the plate. Ally trash or debris blocking (or having the potential of blocking) the overflow pipe. See 'Closed Detention SystemB' Standard No.3. See 'CatCh BaBlns" Standard No.5. A·4 Relulta Expected When Maintenance I. Performed All trash and debris removed. Structure securely aHached 10 wall and outlet pipe. Structure In correct position. Connections to outlet pipe are watertlghl; structure repaired or replaced and works as designed. Structure has no holes other than designed holes. Gate Is watertight and works as designed. Gate moves up and down easily and Is watertight. Chain Is In place and works as deSigned. Gate Is repaired or replacod to meet design standards. Plate Is In place and works as designed. Plate Is free of all obstructions and works as designed. Pipe Is free of all obstructions and works as designed. See 'Closed Detention Systems' Standard No.3. See "Catch Basins' Standard No.5. 1/90 j KIN G C 0 U N T Y, WAS H I N G TON, SUR F ACE W ATE R DES I G N MAN U A L NO.5 -CATCH BASINS Maintenance Component General Defect Trash & Debris (Includes Sediment) Structural Damage to Frame and/or Top Slab Cracks In Basin Walls/Bottom Settlement/ Misalignment Flre Hazard Vegetation Pollution Condltlonl When Maintenance II Needed Trash or debris of more than 1/2 cubic foot which is located Immediately In front of the catch basin opening or Is blocking' capacity of basin by more than 10%. Trash or debris (In the basin) that exceeds 1/3 the depth from the bottom of basin to invert of the lowest pipe Inlo or oul of Ihe basin. Trash or debris In any Inlet or outlet pipe blocking more than 1/3 of Its height. Dead animals or vegetation that could generate odors that would cause complaints or dangerous gases (e.g., methane). Deposits of garbage exceeding 1 cubic foot In volume. Corner of frame extends more than 3/4 Inch past curb face Into the street Of applicable). Top slab has holes larger than 2 square Inches or cracks wider than 1/4 Inch Ontent Is to make sure all material Is running into the basin). Frame not sitting flush on top slab, I.e., separation of more than 3/4 Inch of the frame from the top slab. Cracks wider than 1/2 Inch and longer than 3 feet, any evidence of soli particles entering catch basin through cracks, or maintenance person judges that structure Is unsound. Cracks wider than 1/2 Inch and longer than 1 foot at the jOint of any Inlet/outlet pipe or any evidence of soli particles entering catch basin through cracks. Basin has settled more than 1 Inch or has rotated more than 2 Inches out of alignment. Presence of chemicals such as natural gas, all, and gasoline. Vegetation growing across and blocking more than 10% of the basin opening. Vegetallon growing In Inlet/outlet pipe joints that is more then six inches tall and less than six inches apart. Nonflammable chemicals of more than 1/2 cubic foot per three feet of basin length. A-5 Relultl Expected When Maintenance Ie Performed No trash or debris located immediately in front of catch basin opening. No trash or debris in the catch basin. Inlet and outlet pipes free of trash or debris. No dead animals or vegetation present within the catch basin. No condition present which would attract or support the breeding of Insects or rodents. Frame is even with curb. Top slab is free of holes and cracks. Frame Is sitting flush on top slab. Basin replaced or repaired to design standards. No cracks more than 1/4 Inch wide at the joint of Inlel/oullet pipe. Basin replaced or repaired to design standards. No flammable chemicals present. No vegetation blocking opening to basin. No vegetation or root growth present. No pollution present other than surface film. 1/90 KIN G C 0 U N T Y, WAS H I N G TON, SUR F ACE W ATE R DES I G N MAN U A L NO.5 -CATCH BASINS (Continued) Maintenance Condltlonl When Maintenance Component Defect II NHded Catch Basin Col/or Col/or Not In Placo Col/or Is missing or only partially in placo. My opon catch basin roqulres maintenance. Locking Mechanism cannot be opened by one Mechanism Not maintenance porson with proper tools. Working Bolts Into frame halle less than 1/2 Inch of thread. Col/er Difficult to One maintenance person cannot remol/e Ramolle lid after applying 80 Ibs. of 11ft; Intent is keep colier from sealing off aCC8sa to maintenance. Ladder Ladder Rungs Ladder Is unsafe due to missing rungs, Unsafe misalignment, rust, cracks, or sharp edges. Metal Grates Grate with opening wider than 7/8 Inch. (If applicable) Trash and Debris Trash and debris that Is blocking more than 20% of grate surface. Damaged or Grate missing or broken member(s) of Missing the grate. A-{) Relultl Expected When Maintenance II Performed Catch basin col/er Is closed. Mechanism opens with proper tools. Col/er can be remol/ed by one maintenance person. Ladder meets design standards and allows maintenance porson safe access. Grate openings meet design standards. Grate free of trash and debris. Grate Is In place and meets design standards. 1/90 KIN G C 0 U N T Y, WAS H I N G TON, SUR F ACE W ATE R DES I G N MAN U A L NO. 10· CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS (Pipes & Ditches) Maintenance Component Pipes Open Ditches Catch Basins Debris Barriers (e.g., Trash Rack) Defect Sediment & Debris Vegetation Damaged Trash & Debris Sediment Vegetation Erosion Damage to Slopes Rock Unlng Out of Place or Missing (If Applicable) Condition. When Maintenance I. Needed Accumulated sediment that exceods 20% of the diameter of the pipe. Vegetation that roduces froo movement of water through pipes. Protective coating Is damagod; rust Is causing more than 50% detorloratlon to any part of pipe. Any dent that decroases the cross section aroa of pipe by more than 20%. Trash and debris oxceeds 1 cubic foot per 1,000 square feet of ditch and slopes. Accumulated sediment that exceeds 20% of the design depth. Vegetation that reduces free movement of water through ditches. See 'Ponds' Standard No. 1 Maintenance person can see native soli beneath the rock lining. See 'Catch Basins' Standard No.5 See 'Debris Barriers' Standard No.6 A-II Re.ults Expected When Maintenance I. Performed Pipe cleaned of all sediment and debris. All vegetation removed so water flows freely through pipes. Pipe repaired or replaced. Pipe repaired or replaced. Trash and debris cleared from ditches. Ditch cleaned/flushed of all sediment and debris so that It matches design. Water flows freely through ditches. See 'Ponds' Standard No. 1 Replace rocks to design standard. See 'Catch Basins" Standard No.5 See 'Debris Barriers' Standard No.6 1190 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I GEoENGINEERS C) Report Geotechnical Engineering Services Surgery Center and Site Improvements Valley Medical Center Renton, Washington January 22, 2004 For Valley Medical Center I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I January 22.2004 Valley Medical Center c/o NBBJ Architects 111 South Jackson Street Seattle. Washington 98104 Attention: Tim Carter and Grant Gustafson. A.I.A. GEoENGINEERS CJ We are pleased to present two copies of our "Report. Geotechnical Engineering Services. Surgery Center and Site Improvements. Renton. Washington." Our services were completed in general accordance with the scope of services presented in our proposal dated December 15. 2003 and authorized by Trevor Hart of Valley Medical Center on December 30, 2003. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you on this project. Please call us if you have any questions regarding the contents of this report or when we may be of further service. Yours very truly, KGO:JJM:ab SEAT:\OO\Finals\220201900R.doc Attachments cc: Trevor Hart (one copy) Valley Medical Center 400 South 43rd Street Renton, Washington 98055 Jaime Saez, PE (two copies) Magnusson KJemencic Associates 1301 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3200 Seattle. Washington 98101 Eanh Science + TechnolollY BOD SlDwarl Sireel Sulle 1420 Seallie. WA 98101 t"'phono 20B.72B.2B74 '.<,'mlte 208.728.2732 web,lto www.seoonglneora.com I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CONTENTS Page No. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................... 1 SCOPE .......................................................................................................................................................... 1 SITE DESCRIPTION ..................................................................................................................................... 3 GENERAL 3 SURFACE CONDITIONS 3 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 3 Site Explorations 3 Laboratory Testing 4 Soil Conditions 4 Groundwater Conditions 4 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................................. 5 GENERAL 5 SITE PREPARATION AND EARTHWORK 5 Site Preparation 5 Excavation Considerations 6 Stripping, Clearing and Grubbing 6 Erosion and Sedimentation Control 6 Subgrade Evaluation 7 Use of On-Site Soil 7 Structural Fill 7 Temporary Excavation Slopes 8 Permanent Cut and Fill Slopes 9 PAVEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS AND SUBGRADE PREPARATION 9 Subgrade Preparation 9 Asphalt Concrete Pavement 9 Portland Cement Pavements 10 CAST-IN-PLACE RETAINING WALLS 10 General 10 Lateral Soil Pressure 10 Footing Design 11 Settlement 11 Lateral Resistance 11 SOLDIER PILE AND TIMBER LAGGING WALLS 11 General 11 Lateral Earth Pressures 12 Lagging 12 Monitoring During Construction 13 MECHANICALLY STABILIZED EARTH 13 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE FOUNDATION DESIGN 14 ENTRY PLAZA IMPROVEMENTS 14 General 14 Interceptor / Collector Drain System 14 Hardscape 14 SEISMICITY 14 General 14 Uniform Building Code (UBC) Site Coefficient 15 International Building Code (IBC) Site Coefficient 15 GcoEngineers Fi Ie No. 2202·019-00\012204 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CONTENTS (CONTINUED) DRAINAGE CONSIDERATIONS Construction Drainage Wall Drainage Surface Drainage Page No. 15 15 15 16 LIMITATIONS .............................................................................................................................................. 16 FIGURES VICINITY MAP SITE PLAN EARTH PRESSURE DIAGRAM INTERCEPTOR/COLLECTOR DRAIN APPENDICES Figure No. 1 2 3 4 Page No. APPENDIX A -FIELD EXPLORATIONS .................................................................................................. A-1 APPENDIX A FIGURES SOIL CLACIFICATION SYSTEM KEY TO LOG SYMBOLS LOG OF BORING LOG OF HAND BORING Figure No. A-1 A-2 A-3 ... A-6 A-7 ... A-8 APPENDIX B -LABORATORY TESTING ................................................................................................ B-1 GENERAL B-1 MOISTURE CONTENT TESTING B-1 SIEVE ANALYSES B-1 ATTERBERG LIMITS TESTING 8-1 APPENDIX B FIGURES SIEVE ANALYSIS RESULTS ATTERBERG LIMITS TEST RESULTS Figure No. 8-1 8-2 APPENDIX C -REPORT LIMITATIONS AND GUIDELINES FOR USE ........................................ C-1 ... C-4 GeoEngineers ii File No. 2202·019-00\012204 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I REPORT GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES SURGERY CENTER AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER RENTON, WASHINGTON FOR VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of our geotechnical engineering services for design and construction of the proposed Surgery Center and site improvements at the Valley Medical Center Campus located northwest of the intersection of South 43rd Street and Talbot Road South in Renton, Washington. The project site is located immediately south of the existing Surgery Center at the south end of the campus and is shown relative to surrounding physical features on the Vicinity Map, Figure 1 and the Site Plan, Figure 2. We understand that the proposed Surgery Center and site improvements include constructing a new parking lot in the helicopter landing pad area and a new pedestrian bridge connecting the Surgery Center and Rapid Care facility located below the north portion of the helicopter landing pad. The proposed parking lot will occupy the present helicopter landing pad and an area that will cut into the present slope just. east of the helicopter landing pad. The west portion of the proposed parking area will be at the same grade as the existing landing pad. The parking lot will slope up to the east at about 1 percent and require cuts ranging from about 2 to 15 feet for the east portion of the parking lot and the parking lot access road. Cast-in-place concrete cantilever retaining walls have been planned for the cut along the east and south sides of the proposed parking lot, however, a cantilever soldier pile with lagging retaining wall is being considered along the southeast comer of the proposed parking lot where utilities are located very close to the back of the planned wall. The proposed pedestrian bridge between the Surgery Center and Rapid Care facility will be supported by the existing north structural wall footing for the Rapid Care facility and the Surgery Center to the north. We understand that the design allowable bearing pressure for the existing structural wall footing at the Rapid Care facility is 6,000 pounds per square foot (psf). The required bearing pressure for the structural wall footing with the loads of the proposed pedestrian bridge is 8,000 psf. SCOPE The purpose of our geotechnical engineering services will be to complete explorations as a basis for developing design recommendations for the proposed retaining walls and allowable soil bearing pressures for the existing north wall footing at the Rapid Care facility. We understand that the allowable soil bearing pressure for the existing Rapid Care facility footing needs to be evaluated to determine if the design allowable bearing capacity can be increased to support the loads of the proposed pedestrian bridge. Our scope of services is in general accordance with the "Required Geotechnical Data" sheet provided by MKA. Our specific scope of services includes the following tasks: 1. Review our in-house files for readily available information relative to the site, and copies of other geotechnical studies that we have been provided. GeoEngineers 1 Fi Ie No. 2202-019-00\012204 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 2. Explore soil and groundwater condition at the site by completing four exploratory borings (B-1 through B-4) ranging in depth from about lOY2 to 26Y2 feet. In addition we completed two hand hole explorations CHH-I and HH-2) to depths of about 2 to 4Y2 feet to expose the foundation supporting the north wall of the Rapid Care facility. 3. Evaluate pertinent physical and engineering characteristics of the foundation soils based on laboratory tests performed on samples obtained from the borings. The laboratory tests include moisture content determinations, sieve analyses, and Atterberg limhs determinations. 4. Describe site geology, soils and groundwater conditions. 5. Provide recommendations for earthwork including the following: • Requirements for stripping, removal of soft, organic or other unsuitable material. • Suitability of on-site soil for use as structural fill. • Imported structural fill specifications. • Placement and compaction of structural fill for support of structures and adjacent roadway and walkway areas. • Utility trench backfill placement and compaction. • Evaluate the effects of weather and construction equipment on the site soils. • Temporary and permanent dewatering requirements if necessary. 9. Provide recommendations for allowable temporary cut slope inclinations, and permanent cut and fill slope inclinations. 10. Provide general recommendations for alternative retaining waH design for support of the cuts being planned along the southeast and east sides of the parking lot. 11. Develop recommendations for concrete cast-in-place cantilevered retaining walls for support of slopes along the access driveway and the parking area. This will include allowable soil bearing pressures, settlement estimates, lateral soil pressures and base friction values. 12. Provide recommendations for permanent cantilevered solider pile and lagging shoring for support of cuts along the southeast portion of the parking area where existing utilities are located close to the back of the planned walls. We also provided lateral modulus of subgrade reaction for evaluation of wall deflections. 13. Provide recommendations for allowable bearing pressures and settlement estimates for the existing shallow spread footings suppOJting the north wall of the Rapid Care facility. 14. Provide recommendations for seismic design in accordance with the 1997 Uniform Building Code (UBC) and 2003 International Building Code emC). 15. Provide recommendations for temporary and permanent drainage improvements, as necessary. This includes recommendations for back-drainage for the retaining walls. 16. Provide recommendations for subgrade preparation in walkway and pavement areas. This includes recommendations for base course and a California Bearing Ratio (CBR) value for pavement design. 17. Provide recommendations for surface and subsurface drainage systems. This includes recommendations for footing and retaining wall drainage systems based on the groundwater conditions encountered or expected. ] 8. Provide a written report presenting our findings, conclusions and recommendations, along with suppol1ing field and laboratory data. GcoEnginccrs 2 Fi Ie No. 2202-019-00\012204 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SITE DESCRIPTION GENERAL The site is located on the east side of the Kent valley and is part of a greater west-facing slope above the valley floor. We reviewed portions of the report for the main hospital building and studies in our files for nearby projects. We researched the surficial geology at the project site by reviewing the United States Geologic Survey's "Geologic Map for the Renton Quadrangle, Washington" dated 1965. Ground moraine deposits (Qgt) that are mostly ablation and lodgement till consisting of sand, silt, clay and gravel are mapped at the project site. Ground moraine deposits are typically poorly drained. Renton Formation (Tr) deposits of sandstone, mudstone and shale and Undifferentiated deposits (Qu) of till, sand, silt, clay and gravel are also mapped near the project site. In addition, we reviewed the United States Department of Agriculture "Soil Survey, King County Area, Washington" dated November 1973. The soil survey identified deposits of Alderwood grave1Jy sandy loam (AgC) at the project site. The Alderwood gravelly sandy loam is a sandy soil with varying amounts of silt and gravel that is very well to moderately wel1 drained and is generally found in upland areas. SURFACE CONDITIONS The proposed Surgery Center and site improvements project is located at the south end of the campus immediately south of the existing Surgery Center. The site is currently the location of the helicopter landing pad and the Rapid Care facility, which is located below the north portion of the helicopter landing pad. The helicopter landing pad and Rapid Care facility are boarded by the Surgery Center to the north, a parking lot to the west, and South 43r~ Street to the south. The ground surface in the existing helicopter landing pad ranges from about Elevation 95Y2 feet along the west edge to about Elevation 98 feet along the east edge. The area east of the helicopter landing pad consists of a landscaped area which slopes up toward the east at about a 10 percent slope. The ground surface in this portion of the project area ranges from about Elevation 95 Y2 feet at the helicopter landing pad to about Elevation 108 feet along the east side of the proposed access road. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Site Explorations Subsurface soil and groundwater conditions were explored by completing four borings (B-1 through B-4) and two hand holes (HH-l and HH-2) on December 31, 2003 and January 9, 2004. Borings B-1 and B-2 were completed at the east end of the proposed parking lot to evaluate conditions in the area of proposed retaining walls. Boring B-3 was completed near the west edge of the helicopter landing pad. Boring B-4 was completed in an existing parking area located northwest of the Rapid Care facility. The borings extended to depths ranging from lOY2 to 261h feet below ground surface and were completed using track-mounted hollow-stem auger drilling equipment. The two hand holes (HH-l and HH-2) were completed to depths ranging from about 2 to 4Y2 feet below ground surface along the north edge of the Rapid Care facility. The hand holes were completed by a geologist from our firm using hand equipment. Locations of the explorations were determined in the field by measuring distances with a tape from GeoEnginecrs 3 File No. 2202-019·00\012204 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I existing site features. The locations of explorations are shown in Figure 2. The details of our field exploration program and exploration logs are presented in Appendix A. Laboratory Testing Soil samples were collected during the drilling and were taken to our laboratory for further examination. Selected samples were tested for moisture content, sieve analysis, and Atterberg limits determination. A description of the laboratory testing and the test results are presented in Appendix B. Soli Conditions Sad and rootmass (about 6 inches thick), and topsoil were encountered at the ground surface in borings B-1 and B-2 to depths ranging from about 21/2 to 3 feet. The topsoil was underlain by medium stiff silt in boring B-1 to a depth of about 6 feet. Stiff to hard clay with variable silt, sand, and gravel content was observed below the silt to the bottom of the boring at a depth of about 26Y2 feet below the surface. The topsoil was underlain by stiff to hard clay in Boring B-2. A 3 to 4 foot thick layer of silty gravel was observed within the clay unit in boring B-2 about 9 feet below the surface. The clay in boring B-2 was underlain by very dense sand with silt that contained a 2 to 3 foot thick layer of hard silt about 20 feet below the surface. Boring B-2 was terminated in the very dense sand with silt at a depth of about 26Y2 feet. Approximately 2 inches of asphalt concrete pavement was encountered at the surface in borings B-3 and B-4. The asphalt was underlain by 8 to 12 inches of base consisting of gravel with silt and sand. The gravel base was underlain by stiff to very stiff sandy silt and sandy clay in boring B-3 that extended to a depth of about 91/2 feet. The boring was terminated in a layer of very dense silty sand with gravel at about 11 Y2 feet below the surface. A layer of medium dense silty sand with gravel, approximately 2 to 3 feet thick, was observed below the gravel in boring B-4. The sand was underlain by hard silt with sand and gravel. The boring was terminated in the silt layer at about IOY2 feet below the surface. Two hand holes, HH-l and HH-2, were completed along the north edge of the Rapid Care facility to evaluate the soil below the footings. A layer of topsoil about 2 to 6 inches thick was present at the ground surface in each of the hand holes. The topsoil was underlain by about 11/2 feet of fill consisting of gravel with sand and variable silt. The gravel fill in hand hole ffiJ-1 was underlain by very stiff silt about 31/2 feet below the surface. The building foundation was observed to be supported on the very stiff silt at a depth of 31/2 feet below the ground surface. Hand hole Jlli-2 was terminated in the gravel fill about 2 feet below the surface at the top of the concrete footing. We were unable to find the edge of the foundation because it extends a few feet north of the building wall into the landscaping. Groundwater Conditions We did not encountered groundwater in borings B-1 through B-4 during the drilling. Groundwater was not observed in hand auger hole HH-l. A small amount of perched groundwater was encountered above the footing in hand auger hole HH-2. Groundwater conditions should be expected to fluctuate as a function of season, precipitation and other factors. GeoEngineers 4 File No. 2202·019·001012204 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS GENERAL Based on the results of our explorations. it is our opinion that the proposed Surgery Center site and improvements can be constructed as proposed provided the considerations and recommendations in this report are incorporated in the project design. The primary geotechnical considerations for the project are as follows: • Pedestrian Bridge Foundation Based on our understanding of the anticipated design loads and our analyses. we conclude that the allowable bearing capacity for the existing wall footing of the Rapid Care facility can be increased to support the additional load resulting from the pedestrian bridge with post-construction settlement of less than 1;4 inch. • Cast-in-Place Concrete Retaining Walls It is our opinion that the proposed cast-in-place concrete retaining walls can be utilized to retain the existing soil east of the proposed parking lot. Adequate drainage must be provided to prevent the build up of hydrostatic pressure behind the wall. • Alternate Retaining Walls Mechanically Stabilized Earth (MSE) walls may also be considered for portions of the access road construction. • Soldier Pile with Lagging Wall We conclude that a cantilevered soldier pile with lagging wal1 can be constructed at the southeast corner of the proposed parking lot. Adequate drainage must be provided to prevent the build up of hydrostatic pressure behind the soldier pile wall. • Wet Weather Construction We recommend that site preparation and earthwork be completed during the drier summer months if possible to reduce grading costs. The on-site fill and silty native soils contain a high percentage of fines (silt and clay). are moisture-sensitive. and will likely not be suitable for use as structural fill. It will be difficult. if not impossible. to properly compact these soils if they are too wet or during periods of wet weather. We therefore recommend that the on-site soils not be considered for use as structural fill and that imported structural fill should be used as wall foundation support. wall backfill. utility trench backfill. and to support pavement loads. Further details on specific geotechnical issues are presented in the following sections. SITE PREPARATION AND EARTHWORK Site Preparation We expect that site preparation and earthwork wiII include removal of the existing helicopter landing pad. landscaping within the work area. and excavation to achieve design subgrade elevation in the parking lot and access road areas. Excavation depths at the east end of the parking lot will likely range up to about 15 feet. Some fills will likely be required in localized areas to replace unsuitable fill or native soils below proposed wall footings and pavement areas. Suitable cut slopes. as described in a subsequent section of this report, should be used to protect adjacent improvements and reduce the risk to workers within the excavations. GeoEngineers 5 File No. 2202·019·00\012204 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Excavation Considerations Glacially consoldiated deposits were observed in the explorations. We anticipate that these soils can be excavated with conventional excavation equipment. such as trackhoes or dozers. Although not encountered in the explorations. cobbles or boulders are periodically found in glacially deposited soils. Stripping, Clearing and Grubbing We recommend that the organic-rich soils (sod. rootmass and topsoil) and vegetation. be stripped and stockpiled for later use as topsoil for landscaping purposes. Based on our observations. we anticipate that stripping depths in landscaped areas will generally range from about 6 inches to 3 feet. The deeper deposits of topsoil were observed in borings B-1 and B-2 near the east edge of the proposed parking lot. Stripping depths will be locally greater if large vegetation or trees are cleared and grubbed. Erosion and Sedimentation Control Potential sources or causes of erosion and sedimentation depend upon construction methods. slope length and gradient. amount of soil exposed and/or disturbed. soil type. construction sequencing and weather. Implementing an erosion and sedimentation control plan will reduce the project impact on erosion-prone areas. The plan should be designed in accordance with applicable city. county and/or state standards. The plan should incorporate basic planning principles including: • Scheduling grading and construction to reduce soil exposure. • Retaining existing asphalt whenever feasible. It Revegetating or mulching denuded areas. • Directing runoff away from denuded areas. • Reducing the length and steepness of slopes with exposed soils. • Decreasing runoff velocities. • Preparing drainage ways and outlets to handle concentrated or increased runoff. • Confining sediment to the project site. • Inspecting and maintaining control measures frequently. In addition. we recommend that sloped surfaces in exposed or disturbed soil be restored so that surface runoff does not become channeled. Some sloughing and raveling of slopes with exposed or disturbed soil should be expected. Temporary erosion protection should be used and maintained in areas with exposed or disturbed soils to help reduce erosion and reduce transport of sediment to adjacent areas. Permanent erosion protection should be provided by landscape planting. Until the permanent erosion protection is established and the site is stabilized, site monitoring should be performed by qualified personnel to evaluate the effectiveness of the erosion control measures and to repair and/or modify them as appropriate. Provisions for modifications to the erqsion control system based on monitoring observations should be included in the erosion and sedimentation control plan. GcoEngineers 6 File No. 2202·019·00\012204 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Subgrade Evaluation We recommend that site preparation and earthwork be completed during the drier summer months, if possible, to reduce grading costs. The existing soils at the site generally consist of silty sand, silt, or clay and have a relatively high fines content (material passing the U.S. Standard No. 200 sieve) and are moisture sensitive. Operation of equipment on these soils will be difficult, if not impossible, during periods of wet weather and this material will be readily softened when construction traffic operates on it. Deterioration of the shallow subgrade soils exposed after cuts are made should be expected, especially if site preparation work is done during periods of wet weather. The exposed subgrade should be evaluated before placing structural fill or base course material. Proofrolling with heavy rubber-tired construction equipment should be used for this purpose. The site should be proofroJJed only during dry weather. Probing should be used to evaluate the subgrade during periods of wet weather. Any soft areas noted during proofrolling or probing should be excavated and replaced with compacted structural fill. Use of On-Site Soil The native soils encountered in our explorations contain a significant amount of fines (particles smaller than the U.S. Standard No. 200 sieve) and are therefore moisture sensitive and will be difficult to compact. Jt will be especially difficult to compact these soils during wet weather. We therefore recommend that imported sand and grave) be planned for structural fill to support structures and where compaction to 95 percent of maximum dry density is required. However, we recommend that the on-site soil be considered for use as wall backfill where the retaining walls will be supporting landscaped area and compaction is not critical. The recommendations for wall drainage and backfill presented in the Drainage Considerations section include an alternate system of wall drainage that allows the use of native soil in the backfill. Structural Fill New fills placed in the pavement areas and as wall backfill should be placed and compacted as structural fill. In our opinion, the near surface soils contain a relatively high moisture content and fines content (material passing the US No. 200 sieve). The on-site soils will be difficult if not impossible to compact to more than about 90 percent of the maximum dry density (MDD) unless they can be properly moisture conditioned. The on-site soils will not be suitable for use as fill during periods of wet weather. We therefore recommend, that the project be planned to include importing granular structural fill for backfill of walls and footings, and in utility trenches. However,the on site soils may be used for retaining wall backfill in landscaped areas as described above. We recommend that wall drainage backfill consist of free draining imported structural fill composed of sand and gravel containing less than 3 percent fines (material passing U.S. Standard No. 200 sieve) by weight relative to the fraction of the material passing the lA-inch sieve. This material should be free of debris, organic contaminants and rock fragments larger than 6 inches. As a minimum, structural fiJI placed behind retaining walls supporting pavement or sidewalks, to construct pavement or sidewalk areas, to backfill utility trenches and retaining wall footings, and to support wall foundations should meet the criteria for common borrow as described in Section 9-03.14(3) GeoEngineers 7 File No. 2202-019·00\012204 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I of the current Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) Standard Specifications. Common borrow will be suitable for use as structural fill during dry weather conditions only. If structural fill is placed during wet weather, the structural fill should consist of gravel borrow as described in Section 9-03. J 4( 1) of the 2004 WSDOT Standard Specifications. Structural fill should be mechanically compacted to a firm, non-yielding condition. Structural fill placed below wall foundations should be compacted to at least 95 percent of MDD (per ASTM D 1557). Pavement area fill. including utility trench backfill and fill to support walkways should be compacted to at least 90 percent of MDD (ASTM D 1557), except for the upper 2 feet below finish subgrade surface, which should be compacted to at least 95 percent of MDD (ASTM D 1557). Retaining wall backfill should be placed and compacted to between 90 and 92 percent of MDD (ASTM D 1557) using hand equipment to avoid overstressing the walls. Structural fill should be placed in loose lifts not exceeding 8 to 10 inches in thickness. Each lift should be conditioned to the proper moisture content and compacted to the specified density before placing subsequent lifts. We recommend that a representative from our firm be present to perform in-place moisture-density tests in the fill to evaluate whether the compaction specifications are being met, and advise on any modifications to procedure which might be appropriate for the conditions encountered. Temporary Excavation Slopes All temporary excavation slopes must comply with the prOVIsIons of Title 296 Washington Administrative Code (WAC), Part N, "Excavation, Trenching and Shoring." The contractor performing the work has the primary responsibility for protection of workmen and adjacent improvements. We anticipate that unshored temporary cuts will be used along the east side of the proposed parking lot. The stability of cut slopes is a function of soil type, groundwater conditions, slope inclination, slope height and nearby surface loads. Oversteepened temporary cut slopes could impact the stability of adjacent work areas, existing utilities, and endanger personnel. All cut slopes and temporary excavation support, if necessary, must be constructed or installed, and maintained in accordance with the requirements of the appropriate local, state and federal safety regulations. We recommend temporary cut slope inclinations of Will: 1 V (horizontal to vertical) in the upper soft topsoil (to a depth of 2 to 3 feet) and %H: IV in the underlying stiff to hard soil deposits encountered at the site. Some areas of caving/sloughing of the cut slopes may occur at this inclination. The inclination may need to be flattened by the contractor if significant caving/sloughing occurs. Alternatively, shotcrete flashcoating may be used to control face stability. The need for flashcoating should be determined when the cut slopes are exposed during construction. These cut slope recommendations apply to fully dewatered conditions. For open cuts at the site we recommend that: • No traffic. construction equipment, stockpiles or building supplies be allowed at the top of the cut slopes within a distance of at least 10 feet from the top of the cut. • Exposed soil along the slope be protected from surface erosion using waterproof tarps or visqueen or flashcoating with shotcrete. • Construction activities be scheduled so that the length of time the temporary cut is left open is reduced to the extent practical. GeoEn gi neers 8 File No. 2202·019·00\012204 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I • Erosion control measures be implemented as appropriate such that runoff from the site is reduced to the extent practical. • Surface water is diverted away from the excavation. • The general condition of the slopes be observed periodically by GeoEngineers to confirm adequate stability. Since the contractor has control of the construction operations, the contractor should be made responsible for the stability of cut slopes, as well as the safety of the excavations. The contractor should take all necessary steps to ensure the safety of the workers near slopes. Permanent Cut and Fill Slopes We recommend that permanent cut and fill slopes be constructed at 3H: 1 V, or flatter. Flatter slopes might be considered for ease of maintenance. Unprotected cut and fill slopes will be subject to erosion until a protective vegetative cover is well established. Therefore, we recommend that slope surfaces be mulched and planted as soon as practical to minimize the potential for erosion. Appropriate drainage measures, as described below under the "Drainage Considerations" section of this report, should be implemented to collect and control surface runoff and groundwater seepage. PAVEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS AND SUBGRADE PREPARATION SubgrBde Preparation Parking areas, walkways, and access drive pavement subgrades should be prepared as described previously in the Earthwork section of this report. In addition to these requirements, we recommend that the prepared subgrade be proofrolled with heavy rubber-tired construction equipment thoroughly prior to paving to locate any soft or pumping soils. Proof rolling should be completed during dry weather only. Probing should be used to evaluate the pavement or walkway subgrade during periods of wet weather. If soft or pumping soils are encountered, such unsuitable subgrade soils should be overexcavated and replaced with adequately compacted structural fill. The depth of overexcavation should be determined by GeoEngineers. Assuming that the pavement subgrade has been prepared and satisfactorily evaluated as described above, a CBR (California Bearing Ratio) of 20 could be used for pavement design purposes. Asphalt Concrete Pavement In light-duty pavement areas such as automobile parking, we recommend a nul1Jmum pavement section consisting of 2 inches of Class B asphalt concrete (AC) over a 4-inch thickness of densely compacted crushed rock base course. In heavy-duty pavement areas (e.g., driveway entrance and materials delivery), we recommend a minimum pavement section consisting of at least 3 inches of Class B asphalt concrete (AC) over a 6-inch thickness of densely compacted crushed rock base course. Thicker asphalt sections may be needed if the anticipated traffic loads and intended use are greater than described above. The asphalt concrete and crushed base materials, and placement and compaction requirements should generally conform to the current WSDOT Specifications for Roads, Bridges and Municipal Construction. GeoEngineers 9 File No. 2202·019·00\012204 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Asphalt treated base (ATB) may be used in place of the crushed rock base course. Typically. the design thickness of ATB is about one-half of the thickness of crushed rock base course. However. the design thickness will vary depending on site-specific subgrade soils. traffic loads. and ATB mix design. We can provide specific ATB thickness recommendations for the site if requested. Portland Cement Pavements We recommend that PCC supported on properly prepared subgrade be designed based on a subgrade modulus of 300 pounds per cubic inch. Additional recommendations for PCC pavements are presented below in the Entry Plaza Improvements section. CAST-IN-PLACE RETAINING WALLS General The lateral soil pressures acting on cast-in-place retaining walls will depend on the nature. density and configuration of the soil behind the wall. We understand that retaining walls will be required along the east access road and a portion of the south side of the proposed parking lot. At this time. a cast-in- place wall is being considered for this application. The base of the retaining wall will likely be located within the dense sand or very stiff to hard silt/clay soils encountered in our explorations. It is especially important that the wall subgrade soils are properly prepared. It is important that the exposed subgrade soils be compacted to an unyielding condition. It may be desirable to place compacted crushed rock fill to protect the subgrade and support the wall footing of a cast-in-place wall. Subgrade preparation may also require it 1-to 2-foot deep overexcavation below the design bottom of wall. depending on exposed subgrade conditions. particularly in areas where a wall transitions into an existing wall and the design bottom of wall elevation may be located in fill associated with the existing wall. A GeoEngineers representative should evaluate the exposed subgrade soils to determine the appropriate overexcavation depth. Lateral Soli Pressure Cast-in-place walls will likely be used for the retaining walls along the east access road and a portion of the south sides of the proposed parking lot. Cast-in-place retaining walls that are allowed to rotate outward at the top (at least 0.001 times the wall height) should be designed for active earth pressures computed using an equivalent fluid density of 35 pounds per cubic foot (pct). This assumes that the ground surface supported behind the wall is maintained at a slope of about 10 percent consistent with the existing conditions. If the ground surface supported· by the waH rises at an inclination of 3H: 1 V to 2H: 1 V or the wall is restrained from rotating outward. then the wall should be designed using an equivalent fluid density of 55 pcf. These values are based on the requirements that adequate drainage is provided behind the walls. as discussed below in the "Drainage Consideration" section .. The recommended lateral soil pressures do not include the effects of surcharges such as construction traffic or seismic loads. We recommend a construction vehicle surcharge equivalent to a uniform lateral pressure of 75 pounds per square foot (pst) be applied to the full height of the walls for this construction traffic surcharge condition. We also recommend that a uniform lateral pressure based on 8H in psf. where GeoEngineers 10 File No. 2202·019·00\012204 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I H is the wall height, be applied to the full height of the wall when taking seismic loading into consideration. We further recommend that any other surface loads be considered as appropriate. We recommend fill within 5 feet of the back of cast-in-place retaining walls be compacted to between 90 and 92 percent of MOD. Over-compaction near the wall should be avoided to prevent build-up of excessive lateral pressures on the wall. Footing Design We also recommend that shallow foundations be founded at least 18 inches below lowest adjacent existing grade. The bottom of shallow foundations will likely be supported in the dense sands or stiff to hard silt/clay soils encountered in our explorations. Footings supported on adequately compacted native dense sand or stiff to hard silt/clay as recommended above may be designed for an allowable bearing pressure of 6,000 psf for the total of all dead and live loads. Footings supported on structural fill may be design for an allowable bearing pressure of 4,000 psf. This value is exclusive of the weight of the footing and any overlying backfill. The allowable bearing pressure may be increased by one-third when considering wind or seismic loads. Settlement We estimate that post-construction settlements of retaining wall footings, if founded on undisturbed, firm, and unyielding native soil or properly compacted structural fill extending to the undisturbed, firm native soil, as recommended above, will be less than V2 inch. We expect that differential settlements along continuous wall footings wm not exceed about 114 inch measured along 25 feet of continuous footing. Lateral Resistance The available resistance to lateral foundation loading is a function of the frictional resistance that can be developed on the base, and the passive resistance that can develop on the face of below-grade elements. The allowable frictional resistance for shallow foundation elements may be computed using a coefficient of friction of 0.4 applied to vertical dead-load forces. The allowable passive resistance on the face of wall footings may be computed using and equivalent fluid density of 300 pcf (triangular distribution) for structural fill. The above passive resistance applies if the soil extending out from the face of the foundation element for a distance at least equal to two and one-half times the height of the element consist of structural fill compacted to at least 95 percent of MOD or dense undisturbed native soil. The above coefficient of friction and passive equivalent fluid density value includes a factor of safety of about 1.5. SOLDIER PILE AND TIMBER LAGGING WALLS General We understand that the retaining wall located at the southeast corner of the proposed parking lot will likely consist of a soldier pile and timber lagging shoring system. We also understand that a cast-in-place retaining wall is not being considered due to the close proximity of existing utilities to the back of the wall. We further understand that a concrete facing will be constructed in front of the lagging a~ a GeoEngineers 11 File No. 2202·019·00\012204 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I permanent wall facing. A soldier pile and timber lagging wall system combines wide flange steel sections embedded in concrete filIed below-grade shafts. and timber lagging spanning between adjacent soldier piles within the depth of the excavation. The concrete and steel section solider piles are typically positioned at a center-to-center spacing of 8 feet or less. As an alternate. the soldier pile spacing can be reduced to 6 feet on center and temporary lagging can be eliminated within the dense/stiff soils encountered below a depth of about 4 feet in our explorations. It will likely be necessary to place lagging in the upper portion of the wall excavation to support the upper soils. This alternate system for temporary support is described below. The walI system is typically designed to resist lateral soil loads by cantilever action through the lateral restraint provided by the embedded portions of soldier piles. Additional lateral restraint can be provided by tie-backs. if necessary. The advantage of this wall system is that no mass excavation is necessary to install the wall. The solider piles are first drilled into the existing ground. and the remainder of the wall is subsequently constructed below ground with the solider piles providing soil restraint during construction. Lateral Earth Pressures We recommend that soldier pile walls be designed using the appropriate earth pressures based on the final configuration of the retaining wall. The Earth Pressure Diagram presented in Figure 3 summarizes the design parameters for a cantilevered. permanent soldier pile wall. Design of permanent shoring must include potential surcharge loads from construction traffic as well as seismic loads. Figure 3 includes a recommended uniform surcharge pressure for construction traffic of 75 psf. In addition. we recommend a uniform lateral pressure based on 8H in psf. where H is the wall height. be applied to the full height of the wall when taking seismic loading into consideration. We recommend that the embedded portion of the soldier piles extend a sufficient distance below the base of the excavation to provide equilibrium. We recommend that the passive pressure be calculated by assuming a rectangular distribution of 1000 psf and a triangular distribution of 400 psf which act over 2 times the soldier pile diameter or the soldier pile spacing whichever is less. Cobbles and/or boulders may be present in the glacial soils. The contractor should be prepared to address the presence of cobbles and/or boulders during construction. Lagging We recommend that the lagging be designed for uniform pressures equal to one-half the active lateral earth pressures presented in Figure 3. This pressure reduction is based on a maximum center-to-center pile spacing of 8 feet. If a wider spacing is desired. we should be consulted for revised lagging pressures. Lagging should be installed between the soldier piles to retain the soils. Permanent lagging may consist of timber or concrete. If timber is used. it must be adequately treated for protection against water and biodegradation. We recommend that treated timber lagging be used to prevent rotting that can lead to potential long-term settlement and loss of support behind the wall where utilities are present. Lagging should be installed with a lA-inch gap between lagging sections to allow for groundwater to flow through GeoEnginecrs 12 File No. 2202·019·00\012204 I 'I I I I I I I I I I I I I I a I I I the shoring system and to be collected by the drainage system installed in front of the lagging, as discussed in Drainage Considerations section of this report. We conclude that temporary lagging may be eliminated within the dense/stiff soils if the soldier pile space is reduced to 6 feet on center or less. We recommend that the soils above the dense/stiff soil be supported by lagging or laid back to a stable slope (about 1-1I2H:1V). We also expect that the soldier piles will be placed in drilled holes at least 2 feet in diameter that are grouted up to the level of the lagging or cut slope. Monitoring During Construction We recommend that GeoEngineers observe the installation of the soldier piles and lagging during construction to verify that the assumed design conditions are encountered during construction. In addition, observations with respect to groundwater, excavation stability can be monitored to verify that the conditions are as planned. MECHANICALLY STABILIZED EARTH We understand that MSE or segmental block retaining walls may be considered for the east access road because they are less expensive than a cast-in-place wall and can easily be removed for future campus expansions. GeoEngineers can provide the wall design plans and specification; however, this type of walls can be designed by the wall manufacturer or contractor. If the wall manufacturer or contractor provide the design, we strongly recommend that GeoEngineers review their plans and specifications, to verify the design assumptions and construction details. The foJlowing paragraphs include our general recommendations for MSE wall design. The base of the retaining waJls will generally be located within the stiff to hard silt and dense sand and gravel encountered in our exploration. It is especially important that the subgrade is properly prepared. Subgrade preparation will require a 6-inch deep overexcavation below the design bottom of wall, compaction of the exposed subgrade soils to an unyielding condition, and placement of properly compacted crushed rock fill to support the lowest course of block. The crushed rock fill placed at the base of the wall should conform to WSDOT specification 9-03.9(1) for ballast or 9-03.9(3) for crushed surfacing base course (CSBC). Based on our experience on other similar MSE retaining wall projects, the drainage material behind the wall may consist of the same crushed rock fill as used at the base of the wall or may consist of free-draining gravel that conforms to WSDOT specification 9-03.12(2) for gravel backfill for walls. The reinforced fill behind the wall must be compacted to at least 95 percent of the MOD. The reinforced fiJI should consist of imported sand and gravel that conforms to WSDOT specification 9-03.14( 1) for gravel borrow. The following soil parameters may be used in the design of segmental block walls for this project: Soli Unit Weight, y Angle of internal Soil Type/Location (pounds per cubic foot, pct) Frictlon,_4> (dClg!ees) Wall Foundation Soil 120 30 Infill Soil 140 34 Retained Soil J20 30 Final design of the retaining walls should include an evaluation of the global stability of each wall. GeoEngincers 13 File No. 2202-019-00\012204 I· 'I 'i I I I I 'I I I I, I ·1 I I I I I I PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE FOUNDATION DESIGN Based on the subsurface explorations completed near the existing footings along the north side of the Rapid Care facility (HH-I and B-4), we conclude that the footings are founded on very firm glacially consolidated soil. The bottom of the wall footing is at about Elevation 77 feet. We expect that the glacially consolidated soils below the footing can provide the adequate bearing capacity to support loads on the order of 8,000 psf without appreciable compression of the underlying soil. It is our opinion that wall footing subgrade can provide the desired bearing capacity for the increased loads from the proposed pedestrian bridge. Furthermore, we estimate that settlement that may be caused by the increase in load will be less than 14 inch. ENTRY PLAZA IMPROVEMENTS General We understand that improvements to the southeast entry to the Surgery Center will include hardscape and landscaping improvements at the Entry Plaza. We have been asked to provide recommendations for intercepting surface water the will flow across the landscaping toward the east building wall (basement wall). The ground surface in landscaping area will slope gently toward the building. The details regarding building backfill and foundation drains are not known, therefore an additional interceptor/collector drain will be added to reduce the risk of water infiltrating along the basement wall. In addition, new Portland cement concrete (PCC) surfacing will be added at the entry plaza and our recommendations for support of the hardscape were requested. Our recommendations are included below. Interceptor I Collector Drain system We recommend that the interceptor/collector drain include a 4-inch diameter rigid, smopth-walled, perforated polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pipe surrounded by a zone of washed drain rock that is wrapped in a non-woven geotextile. A PVC membrane should be placed along the face of the basement wall and extend below the zone of drain rock for a distance of about 4 feet to prevent water from infiltrating the existing backfill located along the basement wall. The details of the recommended drain system are shown in Figure 4. Hardscape We understand that the additional pavement at the Entry Plaza will consist of a 6-inch thickness of PCC overlying 6 inches of compacted crushed rock. In our opinion, this section should be sufficient for the anticipated lightly-loaded vehicles entering the facility, provided the subgrade soils are firm and unyielding prior to placement of the pavement section. We recommend toat the subgrade be prepared as recommended above in the Site Preparation and earthwork section, and that a representative of GeoEngineers observe the subgrade before the crushed rock is placed. SEISMICITY General The Puget Sound area is a seismically active region and has experienced thousands of earthquakes in historical lime. Seismicity in this region is attributed primarily to the interaction between the Pacific, GeoEngineers 14 File No. 2202-019-00\012204 I I I I I 'I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Juan de Fuca and North American plates. The Juan de Fuca plate is subducting beneath the North American Plate. Each year 1.000 to 2,000 earthquakes occur in Oregon and Washington. However, only a few of these are typically felt because the majority of recorded earthquakes are smaller than Richter magnitude 3. In recent years, three large earthquakes occurred which resulted in some liquefaction in loose alluvial deposits and significant damage to some structures. The first earthquake, which was centered in the Olympia area, occurred in 1949 with a Richter magnitude of 7.1. The second earthquake, which occurred in 1965, was centered between Seattle and Tacoma and had a Richter magnitude of 6.5. The most recent earthquake, which occurred in February 2001, was centered in the Nisqually area and had a Richter magnitude of about 6.8. Uniform Building Code (UBC) Site Coefficient The Puget Sound region is designated as a Seismic Zone 3 in the 1997 edition of the Uniform Building Code (UBC). For Zone 3 locations, a Seismic Zone Factor (Z) of 0.30 is applicable. In our opinion, the soil profile at the site is best characterized as Type Sc (1997 UBC). International Building Code (IBC) Site Coefficient In our opinion, the soil profile at the site is best characterized in the 2003 edition of the International Building Code as Site Class C (2003 mC). DRAINAGE CONSIDERATIONS Construction Drainage Depending on the time of year. we expect that shallow perched groundwater may be encountered during excavation. We anticipate that this water can be temporarily handled during construction by ditching and pumping from sumps, as necessary. All coHected water should be safely routed to suitable discharge points and should comply with all local and regional regulations for water quality before discharging. Wall Drainage Cast-in-place Walls We expect that some of the retaining walls will support parking areas and some will support landscaped areas. BackfiH placed behind walls supporting pavement must be compacted to a higher standard than walls supporting landscaping. We therefore recommend that walls supporting pavements be backfilled using imported sand and gravel. The on-site native soil may be used as wall backfill where landscaping is planned and the areas are not settlement sensitive. The following paragraphs present recommendations for wall drainage for both situations. Wall drainage when backfilling with native soil should include at least a minimum 12-inch thick zone of free draining sand and gravel with less than 3 percent fines placed against the back of the retaining walls. The zone of free draining backfill should extend from the base of the wall to within 1 foot of the finish ground surface. The upper I-foot should consist of relati vely impermeable on-site soil or be capped with pavement to reduce surface water infiltration. A non-woven geotextile fabric such as Mirafi 140N. Polyfelt TS600, Trevira 1112, or other as approved by the geotechnical engineer, should be placed GcoEngineers 15 File No. 2202·019·00\012204 I I I I I I' ~I I I I I I I' I I I .1 I I between the wall backfill and the retained native soils to prevent movement of the fine-grained soils into the wall drainage system. A smooth-walled, perforated, polyvinyl chloride (PVC) drain pipe at least 4 inches in diameter should be placed within the bottom of the 12-inch wide zone of free-draining gravel at the base of the wall. Wall drainage when backfilling with imported sand and gravel should also include a 4-inch diameter smooth-walled, perforated, PVC drain pipe, However, the drain pipe should be located within an 18-inch wide and ] 8-inch high zone of drain rock located at the bottom of the wall. The drain rock should be enclosed (entirely wrapped) in a non-woven geotextile to prevent the migration of soil into the drainage system. Backfill above this drainage material must consist of imported sand and gravel as described above in the Structural Fill section. The drain pipe should be connected by a tightline system sloped to drain to an appropriate disposal point. The drain pipe should include clean-outs to access the pipe if maintenance is required. The wall drainage pipes should be installed along the entire length of the wall and discharge to an appropriate tightline collection system. Soldier Pile and Lagging Wall We understand that a concrete facing will likely be installed over the wood lagging for the soldier pile wall. A suitable drainage system should be installed to prevent the buildup of hydrostatic groundwater pressures behind the soldier pile and lagging wall. If timber lagging is used, drainage may be accomplished by spacing the timbers with a vertical gap of approximately lA inch. Strips of drainage material, such as Miradrain, should also be instaIled in front of the lagging. The strip drains should be at least 24 inches wide and extend the entire height of the wall. The space behind the lagging should be filled with free draining material as soon as practical. The free draining material will help reduce the risk of voids behind the wall and provide additional drainage of potential groundwater seepage. The free draining materIal should be weIl graded with no particle larger than 1/4 inch nor smaller than the U.S. Standard No. 40 sieve. We recommend that strip drains be connected to a drainage system instaIled along the base of the wall and that collected water be routed to a suitable discharge point. Surface Drainage Permanent drainage systems should intercept surface water runoff at the top and/or bottom of cut slopes to prevent it from flowing in an uncontrolled manner across the site. LIMITATIONS We have prepared this report for the exclusive use of Valley Medical Center and their authorized agents for the proposed Surgery Center and Site Improvements project. The data and report should be provided to prospective contractors for their bidding or estimating purposes, but our report, conclusions and interpretations should not be construed as a warranty of the subsurface conditions. GeoEngineers 16 File No. 2202-019-00\012204 I I I I I I I I I I I' I; I I, I I I I I Within the limitations of scope. schedule and budget. our services have been executed in accordance with generally accepted practices in the field of geotechnical engineering in this area at the time this report was prepared. No warranty or other conditions. express or implied. should be understood. Any electronic form. facsimile or hard copy of the original document (email. text. table. and/or figure). if provided. and any attachments are only a copy of the original document. The original document is stored by GeoEngineers. Inc. and will serve as the official document of record. Please refer to Appendix C titled "Report Limitations and Guidelines for Use" for additional information pertaining to use of this report. -------~~.------- We trust this report provides the information you require at this time. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you on this project. Please contact us should you have any questions concerning our findings or recommendations. or should you require additional information or services. KGO:JJM:ab SEAT:\OO\Finnls\220201900R.doc Attachments Two copies submitted Copyrightdl 2004 by GeoEngineers. Inc. All rights reserved. GeoEngineers Yours very truly. 17 File No. 2202·019·00\012204 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ... 0 N 0 N N ./ I ~ u ./ 0 0 ./ en I ~ 0 N 0 N N ./ I' ei.: §' til I Reference: USGS 7.5' o 2000 4000 - -- -SCALE IN fEET CONTOUR INTERVAL 25 FEET Wash." revised 1994. GEoENGINEERS tJ VICINITY MAP Earth Sdonce + Tac:hncIogy FIGURE 1 i N I v o ........ N N ........ o OJ :::> « :s I ~ -, -, (!) 3: a ~ o en o N o N N -6 « u 6 o ./ en o N o N N ./ a: §' UJ , .!; ~ " \.0 Notes: 1. 2. Reference: ----,.,/ '--, .. ,-' ./ q'. /. {.J ~. / q+ I /./ . I 1...-...-... .~. -..." ". / ':'........""':'-.1 ~ .... ~ ",:', t ................... '""'~----"'-"'-"'-...-... ~~.",:~-.-....-........:-... .. PROPOSED PARKING LOT , . " ~... ;.:... i;)' . "-.(:: . -!.:" , . I RADIATION ONCOLOGY BUILDING .-:-•. !~. -' ~'-':'--... ~~ .... =::.r- >--.·2~~'~-:=;~!-:§%~~~ / .i / .,i' .... The locations of all features shown are approximate . This figure is for informational purposes only. It is intended to assist in the identification of features discussed in a related document. Data were compiled from sources as listed in this figure. The data sources do not guarantee these data are accurate or complete. There may have been updates to the data since the pUblication of this figure. This figure is a copy of a master document. The master hard copy is stored by GeoEngineers, Inc. and will serve as the official document of record. Drawing entitled "Valley Medical Center, Expansion Project, Site Paving & Grading Plan" doted 12/19/03 by NBBJ. . Ai};! GEoENGINEERS CJ Earth Science + Technology -=---IIT-_ . • o --r::-::-':. , I 'll<> :~Y1'''' .' .,. ... :-...... . . , , " . " , " , , c , -oJ : : a EXPLANATION: HH-1+ B-1 + (25') ~ N ~ 50 SCALE IN FEET SITE PLAN FIGURE 2 HAND HOLE BORING & DEPTH 100 I I I I I I I I I I I "'" 0 .......... (,Q ~ I .......... ~ 0 I' ~ ::t: ::E -:> -:> I (!) ~ Cl cD I 0 0 en 0 N 0 N I N b « u -6 I 0 /' en ~ 0 N 0 I N N /' Ii ~ « I w til RECOMMENDED EARTH PRESSURE DIAGRAM FOR CANTILEVER SOLDIER PILE WALL ~ 400(0-2') (psf) ~ (~s~) ~ Passive Pressure NOT TO SCALE EXPLANATION: H = HEIGHT OF EXCAVATION, FEET D = SOLDIER PILE EMBEDMENT FEET 34H I (psf) -, Active Pressure Seismic Pressure Notes: 1. Passive pressures are assumed ta act over 2 times the Construction Traffic Surcharge soldier pile diameter or the soldier pile spacing, whichever IS less. 2. Active earth pressures assumed to act over pile spacing. 3. Passive pressures include a factor of safety of 1.5. GEoENGINEERS Cd EARTH PRESSURE DIAGRAM Earth Science + Technology FIGURE 3 I I I I I I I I I I I I 'I I 1\ I I I I '<I' o ......... .-o o o I en .- ,......., FT 1FT ------ 1 '7 (''' . \../ I L 1\~EL'1' 'F'OUNDAj/O;4 D(ZA.I 'N - NOTes " I . WASH£:-D !2.0C 1.( SHOULD M£ET WS DoT SEC, 9'-03 .I'Z(5'): I, GeAVEL 13Ac.~Ft~L -FoQ. Df2'-1'We:l-LS" c:M APPf2CJv~D gQUl vkL.EN'L. Z:. Wr2AP vJAS~ED QoC\~ t.U1i"b-I N6~-uJDveN GW-r-:=-.XTJLEj MII2 ... At=='I I~ON.J at? APPt2!l\IED EQI..JIVAL-ENI ~. rt1pe;RHEA~LE 6,A·J2't21Ee SHouLD Be e.Ot-oL 'PVC (1'OND LINee.)) ",,' APPf2VVED€!QiJ/V.A-L.£,.lvr LI. ?e(.2...For2A-rs::O 'PJ(Jt;:;.. $H-O(')l...O B>s ~·INCH 'DIAI'"1ETzS:e. Q\CDtD, '5Moai1-J·WAI..-I-SD PVC, o ~~-------------------------.--------------------------------~ GEoENGINEERS tJ o N N Earth Science + Technology INTERCEPTOR/COLLECTOR DRAIN FIGURE 4 3 ~L. ________________________ ~ ________________________________ ~ I I I GEoENGINEERS Q .·_7:~~' I I I I APPENDIX A I FIELD EXPLORATIONS I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I APPENDIX A FIELD EXPLORATIONS FIELD EXPLORATIONS Subsurface soil and groundwater conditions were evaluated by completing four borings (B-1 through B-4) and two hand holes (HR-1 and HH-2) on December 31. 2003 and January 9, 2004. The borings were completed using track-mounted hollow-stem auger drilling equipment owned and operated by Boretec Inc. The borings were completed to depths ranging from lOV2 to 26Y2 feet below ground surface. The two hand holes were completed to depths ranging from about 2 to 4V2 feet below ground surface. The hand holes were completed by a geologist from our finn using hand equipment. Locations of the explorations were determined in the field by measuring distances with a tape from existing site features. The locations of explorations are shown on the Site Plan, Figure 2. Representative samples were obtained of each soil type encountered in the borings using a 2-inch outside diameter split-barrel standard penetration test (SPT) sampler. The sampler was driven into the soil a total of 18 inches using a 140-pound hammer free-falling a distance of about 30 inches. The hammer was operated using a rope and cathead system. The number of blows required to drive the sampler the last 12 inches, or other indicated distances, is recorded on the boring logs. The borings and hand holes were continuously monitored by a geologist from our firm who visually examined and classified the soils encountered, obtained representative soil samples, observed surface and groundwater conditions and prepared a detailed log of each exploration. Soils encountered were visually classified in general accordance with the classification system described in Figure A-I. A key to the boring log symbols is presented in Figure A-2. The boring logs are presented in Figures A-3 through A-6. The hand hole logs are presented in Figures A-7 and A-8. The logs are based on our interpretation of the field and laboratory data and indicate the various types of soils encountered. They also indicate the depths at which the soils or their characteristics change, although the change might actually be gradual. The densities noted on the boring logs are based on correlation to the blow counts. The densities noted on the hand hole logs are based on the difficulty of digging and our judgement. The ground surface elevations presented on the exploration logs are based on topographic infonnation included in Figure 2. The borings were backfilled in general accordance with local regulatory requirements. GeoEngineers A·1 File No. 2202·019·00\012204 I I I SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM I MAJOR DIVISIONS GROUP GROUP NAME SYMBOL I GW WEll·GRADED GRAVEL, FINE TO COARSE GRAVEL GRAVEL CLEAN GRAVEL COARSE GP POORlY-GRADED GRAVEL GRAINED Moro Than 60% I SOilS of Coo roo Froctlon GRAVEL GM SilTY GRAVEL Retained WITH FINES on No.4 Siove GC CLAYEY GRAVEL I SW WEll·GRADED SAND, FINE TO COARSE SAND SAND CLEAN SAND More Than 60% SP POORlY-GRADED SAND I Retained on More Thon 60% SM SilTY SAND No. 200 Sieve of Coo roo Froctlon SAND I Paases WITH FINES SC CLAYEY SAND No.4 Slevo Ml SilT FINE SilT AND CLAY INORGANIC I GRAINED Cl CLAY SOilS liquid limit ORGANIC Ol ORGANIC SilT, ORGANIC CLAY loua Than 60 I MH SilT OF HIGH PLASTICITY, ELASTIC SilT Moro Than 60% SilT AND CLAY INORGANIC Passos CH CLAY OF HIGH PLASTICITY, FAT CLAY I No. 200 Siove liquid limit ORGANIC OH ORGANIC CLAY, ORGANIC SilT 60 or Moro HIGHLY ORGANIC SOilS PT PEAT I I NOTES: SOil MOISTURE MODIFIERS: 1. Flold classification Is basod on vloual oxamlnatlon of 0011 In Dry • Absonce of molsturo, duaty, dry to tho touch gonorol accordanco with ASTM 02488·90. I 2. Soli closslflcatlon using loboratory teste 18 In gonoral Moist· Damp, but no vlulble watar accordance with ASTM 02487·90. Wet· Visible froe water or saturated, usually sollia obtalnod from bolow 3. Doscrlptlons of soli donslty or conslstoncy oro basod on watortable Interprotatlon of blow count dote, visual appearanca of solla, I and/or tost data. I I GEoENGINEERS CJ SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM FIGURE A·1 f:\Soila·l.doc I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ I l-f!) N ~ w I C!) ... !l; ~ c I ~ C/l ~ i; I ~ ~ 0 '" !)I <;:l 11. I C/l -' 0 ~ >-C/l 0 I I I- >-~ ~ m I 9 '" 0 '" N LABORATORY TESTS AL CA CP CS OS GS %F HA SK SM MD ST TX UC Atterberg limits Chemical analysis Compaction Consolidation Direct shear Sieve Analysis Percent fines Hydrometer analysis Permeability Moisture content Moisture and density Swelling test Triaxial compression Unconfined compression BLOW-COUNT SOIL GRAPHICS SM Soil Group Symbol (See Note 2) Distinct Contact Between Soil \~~S~tr~a~ta~ ________ __ Gradual or Approximate Location of Change Between \~~S~o~iI~S~tr=at=a~ ______ __ Approximate Location of _ _ _ _ Change Within a Geologic ',-_Uni.!: __________ _ 1----- Measured groundwater level Groundwater encountered during drilling/exploration Perched water encountered during drilling/exploration Bottom of Boring SAMPLE GRAPHICS Blows required to drive sampler r- 12 inches using a 140-pound 16 hammer falling 30-inches [I CD Location of sample obtained in general accordance with Standard Penetration Test (ASTM 0-1586) procedures NOTES: Location of SPT sampling attempt with no recovery 1. The reader must refer to the discussion in the report text, the Key to Log Symbols and the exploration logs for a proper understanding of subsurface conditions. 2. Soil classification system is summarized in Figure A-1. KEY TO LOG SYMBOLS Project: Surgery Center and Site Improvements Project Location: Renton, Washington Project Number: 2202-019-00 GEoENGINEERS .r;; Figure: A-2 Sheet 1 of 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Date(s) 12/31/03 Logged RNM Checked JJM Drilled By By Drilling Boretec Drilling Hollow Stem Auger Sampling SPT Contractor Method Methods Auger 3114 inch I.D. Hammer 140 (Ib) hammer/30 (in) drop Drilling EC-55 Track-mounted Rig Data Date Equipment Total 26.5 Surfaca Approx.107 Groundwater Depth (tl) Elevation (It) Level (It. bgs) Datuml System SAMPLES '2 ~ c: c ~ OTHER TESTS a ... ~ ~ MATERIAL DESCRIPTION ?fl. :9 ~ :5 ~ AND NOTES III .2 'i :t::.,r >-0.-1 i ~ ~ ... ,c 0.:8 ... Ql t:,c ~:E OJ III ~ ~8' e[ .m'E ::ltl) W_ coS! .Q ~8 c5~ 0 .E zo:: co ;1: C!>-I C!>cn ML Dark brown sandy slit, trace roots (soft, mOist) (topsoil) -... 1--ML Grades to dark brown sandy silt with occasional gravel (medium stiff, moist) 5-~1 roo - 12 9 ~ CL Brown sandy clay with gravel (stiff, mOist) 19 AL ~ ~ve CL-ML Gray silty clay (hard, mOist) 10-]2 ~~~ --18 33 V~V ~/~ ~~~ ~~~ 15-~3 ~~~ roo -18 25 ~V~ Grades to very stiff, no gravel content 13 AI. /~/ ~V~ /~/ -/V/ 20-]4 ~~~ roo - 6 73 V// With gravel, grades to hard Gravel in shoe -~~~ -~~V V/~ 25-~5 ~~~ --18 52 ~?~ With occasional gravel Note: See Figure A-2 for explanation of symbols LOG OF BORING B-1 GEoENGINEERS C) Project: Surgery Center and Site Improvements Project Location: Renton, Washington Figure: A-3 Project Number: 2202-019-00 Sheet 1 of 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ I b C,!) N ~ I ~ """) Q. C,!) 0 0 en I I I ~ ;; N 0 N ~ Q. I 0 -N C,!) ~ I ~ c.!l m C,!) ~ I iii N 0 N N Date(s) 12/31/03 Logged RNM Checked JJM Drilled By. By Drilling Boretee Drilling Hollow Stem Auger Sampling SPT Contractor Method Methods Auger 3 1/4 inch I.D. Hammer 140 (Ib) hammer/3D (in) drop Drilling EC-55 Track-mounted Rig Data Data Equipment Total 26.5 Surface Approx.106 Groundwater Depth (It) Elevation (It) Level (It. bgs) Detuml System SAMPLES c: §: ~ \ OTHER TESTS .Q 'C ~ MATERIAL DESCRIPTION '#. :9 ro £; ... ~ ~ i :!: -AND NOTES >-0.-) 1l ~ .!:l Q,] c:-j ... .c: ... OJ ::J'8, &l~ Q)Q> E 8 ~ C. :I E ,S!"C Cl~ :I OJ ~Cl E?:>, ~8 i'!"iii 0 Z 0::: OJ ;: c'!)S C,!)C/l 0;: ML Dark brown sandy silt. trace roots (soft. mOist) (topsoil) ~ CL Grades to dark brown sandy clay with occasIOnal gravel (stiff. moist) ~ f--CL Brown sandy clay with gravel (very stiff. moist) 14 AL ~ GM Gray sIlty gravel WIth sand (very dense. mOist) ~ ( --h) Poh~ 5-11 1-1 I 18 27 10-:. 2 3 50/6" ~1 CL Gray clay With gravel and sand (hard. moist) ~ f--~ 10 AL.GS 15-~ LII 3 12 91/9" SP-SM _ Gray fine sand with silt (very dense. moist) -ML Gray sandy silt (hard. moist) 20 -:II 4 5 5015" 1<. ' .. SP-SM Gray fine sand With SIlt (very dense. wet) .. -. . 25-.... _1_ 5 14 ~--~~--~~~~----~----------------------------------- 87 Note: See Figure A-2 for explanation of symbols LOG OF BORING B-2 GEoENGINEERS CJ Project: Surgery Center and Site Improvements Project Location: Renton, Washington Project Number: 2202-019-00 Figure: A-4 Sheel1 of 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Date(a) 12/31/03 Logged RNM Checked JJM Drilled By By Drilling Boretec Drilling Hollow Slem Auger Sempling SPT Contractor Method Methods Auger 3 1/4 inch I.D. Hammer 140 (Ib) hammer/3D (in) drop Drilling EC-55 Track-mounted Rig Data Data Equipment Total 11.4 Surface Approx.96 Groundweter Depth (ft) Etevation (ft) Level (ft. bgs) Datum! System SAMPLES C ~ c: c iii OTHER TESTS .Q '0 i > MATERIAL DESCRIPTION rfl :9 iii -= .... ~ ~ 'E :t:: _ AND NOTES 1 1l ~ u a.] >-0.-.... :2 c:-.... Ql :::la Q) Q) ~~ § ~ Q) a. ~~ J!li: w~ 1ii I!!~ til 0 ~Qi 0 .5 z ~ ii3 s: (!l..J (!len s:u oS: a it AC ~2" asphaltic concrete r a GP-OM Gray fine gravel with sand and silt (medium dense, ML 1""\ moist) (till) r Dark brown sandy sill (stiff, moist) ~ CL Gray sandy clay occasIonal gravel (very sllff, moist) 5-~I I-- 10 19 ~ 13 ~ 10-~2 ~ SM _ Brown to gray sllry fine to medium sand with gravel -15 90/11" :;::.:.: (very dense, moist) Note: See Figure A-2 for explanation of symbols LOG OF BORING B-3 GEoENGINEERS CJ Project: Surgery Center and Site Improvements Project Location: Renton, Washington Figure: A-5 Project Number: 2202-019-00 Sheel1 of 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ I § N ~ UJ I t!l .... Q. t!l g 01 I ~ ·61 r I 0 N ~ ~ Q. I 0 -N t!l Z 11: 0 I I!! t!l ffi ~ I 9 N ~ Date(s) Drilled Drilling Contractor Auger Data Total Depth (ft) Datuml System c: 0 :.c: :5 III j >-0._ ~al 8$ w_ 0 12/31/03 Logged RNM Checked By By Sorelec Drilling Hollow Slem Auger Sampling Method Methods 3 1/4 inch 1.0. Hammer 140 (Ib) hammer/3D (in) drop Drilling Data Equipment 10.3 Surface Approx. 80 1/2 Groundwater Elevation (ft) Level (ft. bgs) SAMPLES ~ '-]! i Q) Q) ~ > :l § Z cr: ffi MATERIAL DESCRIPTION 0"1"'T'I! AC ,,2" Asohalt concrete r :rY:r: OP-OM ""'\ Gray brown fine gravel with sand and silt (medium r :.. SM \ dense moist) (fill) . : : Brown silty fine to medIUm sand with grovel (medIUm . :: . dense, moist) ML Gray silt with sand and grave) (hard, moist) 5-11 1-111864 - JJM SPT EC-55 Track-mounted Rig OTHER TESTS AND NOTES -~~--~----------------i Note: See Figure A-2 for explanation of symbols GEoENGINEERS .9 LOG OF BORING 8-4 Project: Surgery Center and Site Improvements Project Location: Renton, Washington Project Number: 2202-019-00 Figure: A-6 Sheet 1 of 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Date Excavated: 12/31/03 Logged by: RNM Equipment: Hand Tools Surface Elevation (ft)· Almrox.81 ... II ~ c: E OTHER TESTS 0 :l MATERIAL DESCRIPTION '#. :9 :-= z AND NOTES It! = {~ .~ ..: :t:: _ 0.'0 ... c:: c::->-0.-Qi .c:: ::l'6, m~ ~~ 0. :l~ CIl.sl E E ~ ~8' ~8 ~'jjj III III e:., 0 rJ) rJ) (!)..J (!)rJ) 03: ML Dark hrown sandY sJ\~ troce roots (soft moist) (tonsoi!) 0 Ie OP-OM Gray tine to coarse gravel with sand and silt (medium dense, 0 moist) (till) 0 c 0 0 c 0 0 c 0 0 c 0 0 c 0 0 c ~ ML Gray silt with sand and gravel (very stiff mOlstl -Concrete Inundation at 1.5' Bottom of concrete foundation at 3.5' Boring completed at 4' on 01109/04 5-_ No groundwater encountered - 10--- 15-. -Note: See Figure A-2 for explanation of symbols - LOG OF HAND BORING HH-1 GEoENGINEERS Q Project: Surgery Center and Site Improvements Project Location: Renton, Washington Figure: A-7 Project Number: 2202-019-00 Sheet 1 of 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ I b (!) N ~ ~ I ..., 0-(!) 0 a: (; I I I I ;; N 0 ~ Ii. 0 I ~ N t:: f!: en I ~ (!) Wi (!) 0 c;> en I (; N 0 N N c: o :0= ro >-mj Date Excavated: 12/31/03 Logged by: RNM Equipment: ___ ....;H:..:,a;;;,:n.:.;:d:....T;..;o:;,,;o:..:.:ls::....-__ _ Surface Elevation (ft)· Approx.81 1/2 5-- - 10- - - 15-- MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Dark brown sandy silt, occasionul gravel and roots (soft, moist) (topsoil) Gray to brown silty fine to course gravel with sand, trace roots (medium dense, moist) Becomes wet at 1.5' Concrete foundatIOn at 1.9' Boring completed at 1.9' on 12/31/03 Perched groundwater encountered at 1.5' Note: See Figure A-2 for expillnation of symbols LOG OF HAND BORING HH-2 - - - OTHER TESTS AND NOTES GEoENGINEER~ Project: Surgery Center and Site Improvements Project Location: Renton, Washington Project Number: 2202-019-00 Figure: A-8 Sheet 1 of 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I GEoENG~NEERS.C;;: APPENDIX B LABORATORY TESTING I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I APPENDIX B LABORATORY TESTING GENERAL Soil samples obtained from the explorations were transported to our laboratory and examined to confirm or modify field classifications, as well as to evaluate engineering properties of the soil samples. Representative samples were selected for laboratory testing consisting of moisture content determination, sieve analysis, and atterberg limits determination. The tests were performed in general accordance with test methods of the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) or other applicable procedures. The results of the laboratory tests are presented in Figures B-1 and B-2. The results of the moisture content determinations are presented on the exploration logs at the respective sample depth in Appendix A. MOISTURE CONTENT TESTING Moisture contents tests were completed in general accordance with ASTM D 2216 for representative samples obtained from the explorations. The results of these tests are presented on the exploration logs in Appendix A at the depths at which the samples were obtained. SIEVE ANALYSES Sieve analyses were performed on selected samples in general accordance with ASTM D 422. The wet sieve analysis method was used to determine the percentage of soil greater than the U.S. No. 200 mesh sieve. The results of the sieve analyses were plotted, classified in general accordance with the uses, and presented in Figure B-1. ATIERBERG LIMITS TESTING Atterberg limits testing was performed on selected fine-grained soil samples. The tests were used to classify the soil as well as to evaluate index properties. The liquid limit and the plastic limit were estimated through a procedure performed in general accordance with ASTM D 4318. The results of the Atterberg limits testing are summarized in Figure B-2. GcoEngineers B-1 File No. 2202-019-00\012204 ------. - --, - - - - - ----- 2202-019-00 JJM:YA:jrs 01/09/04 (Sieve.ppt) u.s. STANDARD SIEVE SIZE G\ 3" 15" 3/4" 3/8" #4 #10 #20 #40 #60 #100 #200 m 0 100 m ... -Z 90 "---Gl ~ .... 80 Z CJ "-m ill 70 .. m ?; \ ::u >-\.. ~ m 60 '" CJ z 50 en en ~ 40 ~ 30 0 ffi 20 a.. 10 ~ 0 m 1000 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 < m :!! > GRAIN SIZE IN MILLiMETmS z G) > C r :0 -< m ~ OJ en I I GRAVEL SAND I :D COBBlES SlLTORCLAY ..... I COARSE I COARSE I MEDIUM m FINE FINE en C r .... en EXPLORATION DEPTH SYMBOL NUMBER (ft) SOIL CLASSIFICATION • 8-2 15.5' Gray silty sand (SM) __ ,-.. ' _ -, - -~ - - - -... - - - - - 2202-019-00 JJM :CTS:jvj 1-10-04 (Atterbergs.ppt) G) m 0 m z G\ Z m m ::c ~ "11 C; C :lJ m m . N ~ m :lJ m m :lJ Q C ~ =t f/) -I m ~ ::0 m f/) c: r--t f/) 60 50 x 40 w 0 ~ ~ 30 u F en ~ Q.. 20 10 o o 10 SYMBOL EXPLORATION NUMBER • B-1 B B-1 A B-2 • B-2 20 30 SAMPlE MOISTURE DEPTH CONTENT{%) 6.0' 19.2 16.0' 13.3 6.0' 13.6 16.0' 9.6 PLASTICITY CHART .... .. •......••••..• ...• ... ... •.•. •... ..... .... ...... .--..... ..•. .•... .... ........ OH orMH M LorOL 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 LIQUID LIMIT LIQUID PLASTICITY LIMIT (%) INDEX(%) SOil DESCRIPTION 31 11 Brown day (Cl) 22 6 Gray silty clay (Cl -Ml) 26 8 Ught brown clay (Cl) 22 7 Dark gray clay (Cl) I I I I I I I I I I I ,I I I I I I I I GEoENGINEERS a ,.-,:::,,15#' APPENDIX C REPORT LIMITATIONS AND GUIDELINES FOR USE I I I I, I I, I I I' I I I I I ,I I I I I APPENDIX C REPORT LIMITATIONS AND GUIDELINES FOR USE1 This appendix provides information to help you manage your risks with respect to the use of this reporl. GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES ARE PERFORMED FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES, PERSONS AND PROJECTS This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of the Valley Medical Center and their authorized agents. This report maybe made available to prospective contractors for their bidding or estimating purposes. but our report. conclusions and interpretations should not be construed as a warranty of the subsurface conditions. This report is not intended for use by others. and the information contained herein is not applicable to other sites. GeoEngineers structures our services to meet the specific needs of our clients. For example. a geotechnical or geologic study conducted for a civil engineer or architect may not fulfill the needs of a construction contractor or even another civil engineer or architect that are involved in the same project. Because each geotechnical or geologic study is unique. each geotechnical engineering or geologic report is unique. prepared solely for the specific client and project site. Our report is prepared for the exclusive use of our Client. No other party may rely on the product of our services unless we agree in advance to such reliance in writing. This is to provide our firm with reasonable protection against open-ended liability claims by third parties with which there would otherwise be no contractual limits to their actions. Within the limitations of scope. schedule and budget. our services have been executed in accordance with, our Agreement with the Client and generally accepted geotechnical practices in this area at the time this report was prepared. This report should not be applied for any purpose or project except the one originally contemplated. A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING OR GEOLOGIC REPORT IS BASED ON A UNIQUE SET OF PROJECT-SPECIFIC FACTORS This report has been prepared for the Surgery Center and Site Improvements Project located at the Valley Medical Center Campus in Renton. Washington. GeoEngineers considered a number of unique. project-specific factors when establishing the scope of services for this project and report. Unless GeoEngineers specifically indicates otherwise. do not rely on this report if it was: • not prepared for you. • not prepared for your project. • not prepared for the specific site explored. or • completed before important project changes were made. I Developed based on material provided by ASFE. Professional Firms Practicing in the Geosciences; www.asfe.org . GeoEngineers C-l File No. 2202-019-00\012204 ,I I I I I I I I I I I I I I '. I I I I For example. changes that can affect the applicability of this report include those that affect: • the function of the proposed structure; • elevation. configuration. location. orientation or weight of the proposed structure; • composition of the design team; or • project ownership. If important changes are made after the date of this report. GeoEngineers should be given the opportunity to review our interpretations and recommendations and provide written modifications or confirmation. as appropriate. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS CAN CHANGE This geotechnical or geologic report is based on conditions that existed at the time the study was performed. The findings and conclusions of this report may be affected by the passage of time. by manmade events such as construction on or adjacent to the site. or by natural events such as floods. earthquakes. slope instability or groundwater fluctuations. Always contact GeoEngineers before applying a report to determine if it remains applicable. MOST GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOLOGIC FINDINGS ARE PROFESSIONAL OPINIONS Our interpretations of subsurface conditions are based on field observations from widely spaced sampling locations at the site. Site exploration identifies subsurface conditions only at those points where subsurface tests are conducted or samples are taken. GeoEngineers reviewed field and laboratory data and then applied our professional judgment to render an opinion about subsurface conditions throughout the site. Actual subsurface conditions may differ, sometimes significantly, from those indicated in this report. Our report, conclusions and interpretations should not be construed as a warranty of the subsurface conditions. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS ARE NOT FINAL Do not over-rely on the preliminary construction recommendations included in this report. These recommendations are not final. because they were developed principally from GeoEngineers' professional judgment and opinion. GeoEngineers' recommendations can be finalized only by observing actual subsurface conditions revealed during construction. GeoEngineers cannot assume responsibility or liability for this report's recommendations if we do not perform construction observation. Sufficient monitoring, testing and consultation by GeoEngineers should be provided during construction to confirm that the conditions encountered are consistent with those indicated by the explorations. to provide recommendations for design changes should the conditions revealed during the work differ from those anticipated. and to evaluate whether or not earthwork activities are completed in accordance with our recommendations. Retaining GeoEngineers for construction observation for this project is the most effective method of managing the risks associated with unanticipated conditions. GcoEngineers C·2 File No. 2202-019-00\012204 I I I I I I I I I I I ,I I I I I I I I A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING OR GEOLOGIC REPORT COULD BE SUBJECT TO MISINTERPRETATION Misinterpretation of this report by other design team members can result in costly problems. You could lower that risk by having GeoEngineers confer with appropriate members of the design team after submitting the report. Also retain GeoEngineers to review pertinent elements of the design team's plans and specifications. Contractors can also misinterpret a geotechnical engineering or geologic report. Reduce that risk by having GeoEngineers participate in pre-bid and preconstruction conferences, and by providing construction observation. DO NOT REDRAW THE EXPLORATION LOGS Geotechnical engineers and geologists prepare final boring and testing logs based upon their interpretation of field logs and laboratory data. To prevent errors or omissions, the logs included in a geotechnical engineering or geologic report should never be redrawn for inclusion in architectural or other design drawings. Only photographic or electronic reproduction is acceptable, but recognize that separating logs from the report can elevate risk. GIVE CONTRACTORS A COMPLETE REPORT AND GUIDANCE Some owners and design professionals believe they can make contractors liable for unanticipated subsurface conditions by limiting what they provide for bid preparation. To help prevent costly problems, gi ve contractors the complete geotechnical engineering or geologic report, but preface it with a clearly written letter of transmittal. In that letter, advise contractors that the report was not prepared for purposes of bid development and that the report's accuracy is limited; encourage them to confer with GeoEngineers and/or to conduct additional study to obtain the specific types of information they need or prefer. A pre- bid conference can also be valuable. Be sure contractors have sufficient time to perform additional study. Only then might an owner be in a position to give contractors the best information available, while requiring them to at least share the financial responsibilities stemming from unanticipated conditions. Further, a contingency for unanticipated conditions should be included in your project budget and schedule. CONTRACTORS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR SITE SAFETY ON THEIR OWN CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS Our geotechnical recommendations are not intended to direct the contractor's procedures, methods, schedule or management of the work site. The contractor is solely responsible for job site safety and for managing construction operations to minimize risks to on-site personnel and to adjacent properties. READ THESE PROVISIONS CLOSELY Some clients, design professionals and contractors may not recognize that the geoscience practices (geotechnical engineering or geology) are far less exact than other engineering and natural science disciplines, This lack of understanding can create unrealistic expectations that could lead to disappointments, claims and disputes. GeoEngineers includes these explanatory "limitations" provisions GeoEngineers C-3 File No. 2202·019-00\012204 I I I I I ,I I I I, I I . . 1 I I I I I ·1 I in our reports to help reduce such risks. Please confer with GeoEngineers if you are unclear how these "Report Limitations and Guidelines for Use" apply to your project or site. GEOTECHNICAL, GEOLOGIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL REPORTS SHOULD NOT BE INTERCHANGED The equipment, techniques and personnel used to perform an environmental study differ significantly from those used to perform a geotechnical or geologic study and vice versa. For that reason, a geotechnical engineering or geologic report does not usually relate any environmental findings, conclusions or recommendations; e.g., about the likelihood of encountering underground storage tanks or regulated contaminants. Similarly, environmental reports are not used to address geotechnical or geologic concerns regarding a specific project. BIOLOGICAL POLLUTANTS GeoEngineers' Scope of Work specifically excludes the investigation, detection, prevention, or assessment of the presence of Biological Pollutants in or around any structure. Accordingly, this report includes no interpretations, recommendations, findings. or conclusions for the purpose of detecting. preventing, assessing. or abating Biological Pollutants. The term "Biological Pollutants" includes, but is not limited to, molds, fungi. spores, bacteria, and viruses, and/or any of their byproducts. GeoEngineers C-4 File No, 2202-019-00\012204 NBBJ 24882.46 ID i Task Name I Design, Bidding & Early DamoIition -8 ..-rths =:j -~j -rl I contract Dorumenis AlE DC and Inlerdisdp!inary Coordination DC Revisions and VE Implementation Final Bad<c:heck and Bid Prepar.nioo ~ Bid Period M BidAward M Jrij Floor Vacated Areas Deffio & Atiirtemeni I I-gj Surgmy Construction -25 lIIonths i 1-;0- I--,,---- I -1-2- t---rr-- I-~ 1 Surgei}' Phase 1 Construction Mova-in 2iidfioor oemil.& Abaiement SUrgery Phase 2 Construction -MDve-tn I-Ts--i Children's-filiiapy M~ --- t-1s-iCT and-Wiiigs2D aOd2EDeiTio_ 8. AbatemBill--- I17l PhBse 2 Pluiiiiiing @ 1C & 2C -- r---w--i cOInpte1e -phaSe 2 Con5trucuOo- ~ PhaSe2 AdJiliiiiSiratioriMove-tn- ~::.,~':= ... I ---22-----1 1 -------1 _23 I ~ F-t-1 coriStruct LDRP VWlg,; 2C ancf2D -6 Months FC-1 Construct NICU -3 Months Move-in Wings 2C and 20 -Vacate 3E MOYIHi. New c-Sectioo Room -1 ~ -Move-iriNICU I ____ _ _ _ ____ _ __ I:J Triage and Support Demo_ & Abatement 2S I FC-2 CoriStiuct vVi1ig 2E -"Months I 29 I-Move-in IMng 2E 30 --FC:2cOnstiiJdTriageandSUiiPOrt~4Months-- 1311-·--Move:.n trlage& SuJiiiOrt offices Duration 168 days 7Sdiys 15 days 15 days 10 days 35-days 15 days --30 daYS 550 days 260 days 10 days 36 daYs 260 days 10 days Start Finish Wad 10/15103 Fn 6/4104 lIVed 10115703 F n 1I30I04 Moo 2I2lO4 Fn 2120104 Mon2J23/04 Fn 3112104 i Mon3l1~ -Moo 3/29/04 Moo 5117iD4 Moo4~ ilion 617104 Moo 617104 Man 5I23JOs Mon-714105 Moo 7l3106 Fn 3J26I04 Fn 5114104 Fn6l4104 Fn 5I141!i4 Fn 71141D6 I I I Fn6l3lO5 i j I Fn6l3lO5 -Fnil1JOs -1 Fn 6/30/06 Fri 7/14106 ~::~::,::i ---ill days -Man 3i22Jo4 ~ii 4n61M -I 15 days 5 days 30dByS 377 days 130 days 60 days 10 days 10 days 10 days 15 diys BB days 10 days Moo4119J04 MooSnO/04 Man 5117104 lion 617i04 Monsi7104 1 Fn~r04 I Fii 51141041 Fn~~ 1 Tue 1111510S I 1 Fn 1213104 I ,~''"'" ---I Moo 12/61D4 Fn 12117104 I Tue 311105 -Moo 3114105 -I 1 Tue 3/1/05 -Man 31141051 T ue 3115105 Moo 414105 I t ~ "'''' n. """" I Fn 711105 Thu 7114105 I --SifdayS---Fir7l1t05--'rue 1111105 1 ___ _ __ ---___I 10 days Wed 1 112105 T ue 11115105 I C:\Doc:uments and Setlingsltcartet\Local SettingslT empOI'8Iy Internet FileslDLK7\ExpProL 03_12_04_ Tuneline_mpp 1 Valley Medical Center Expansion Project Timeline '2004 12005 12006 .!un..L JuI ! Aug j Sep] Oct i Nov I Dec I Jan l,feb I Mar ! AprrMaYT.!un i Jul i Aug I Sep I DC!.. L Nov I Dec I Jan j F~ Mar.J.~ j ~ay I Jun Jul i Aug J Sep I Oct i NDVT5ec I Jan ; Feb I Mar ! APr i MBYl:lUiiT _Jul 1 AiJg 1 Sep Design, Bidding & Earty Dumolition -8 mDrrths 10115103 • • 6/4104 Contraet Documants 1/3D~ AIE-QCmd~~~~ +:~ QC Rovisions and VE 1mpJ"!"alitatioli 2104 F~_""'~~:J~~ BidA~ 3rd Floor VacatDd Areas Demo & ~ _ : ; I Surgary Cansttuction -25 lIIonths ~. .~ Surgary Phase!1 ConstruLtiJ t ; -413105 : : I • • I IIove-in-• ~ : I ~dfloor Damo. & ~ ~ il1/0S : Surgmy Phase 2 Constructi-. ••••••••••••••••••••••• 11_6/30/05 1II0vJ.~ 7I141D6 Children's Therapy ~ova-out .:f'4I04 ~ rL CT md Wings 2D ~ 2E Demo. &jAt>atam~ _ 6/25104 : : I _,~-",@'C&~ i ~~~ CompIGta Phase 2 C~ • 104 : : Phase ~ Administratio~ III . I 4104 -~ I Demo and AbaIament of 3rd Floor ~istrati04 _ 6/25104 --I Family Centar Construction -18 Months 617104'. • 11115105 FC-1 Construct LDRP Wmgs 2C anr 2D -6 Months ~12J3/04 FC-1 Construct NICU -3111onth~ .1 : I -.2/28/05 I : ~ lIIova-in Wmgs 2C and 2D -Vz=ta ~. 121171041 lIIov ...... Now C~on ~. 3/14105 ....,.Mf~- Triago and Support Damo_ & I~. 414105 FC-2 Construct Wing 2E - 4 MontItSt ~6/301OS _ 1110_ Wing 2Ii-t. 7114105 : I FC-2 Cons.t"'ct Triage and Support -4111onth~ ~ 1111/oS . 1II0_Triage& SupportOfficest • 1111S/05 Page 1 of 1 CITY OF RENTON RECEIVED APR 022004 BUILDING DIVISION Date: 01/26104 Print Date: Fri 3/12104 C 0> D -N , N Y > t • u k_" ?, .- L (lJ 0; L ::J Vl u 2 . , '" ' ::, [I +- 0. o c o 2 <0 +-"" lJ) LL > u (lJ o o CD 2 so V> « o o <T o o N "-<T N "-N .' , ... ' ,- , ~ .. ~~~~ _______ ' ----_~-'-~~~----c_,_"-----~--~------~------'-------~---, ------~----~--------- " " • " , I l' 'i' . " .. ~ _. *,-'--:----. _ ... -•• ,( " }; ~ . ~ ...... ,-.-e_""'~ __ \' ;', ': I ) ~ " ", f', 'l~ • "'jiJ-('. c' '- ~ (:1 • ",:..' 'I / , " ". , , ,." . . , " PI WALK " N E 1~98,682.87 , , , MEET IX MATCH EXIST CURB, Tvn--.l " ';' " '----+'EXIST ELEC EASEMENT,- SEE GENERAL NOTE 7 - -, : " -, , --, i ", ". r ' ~ I. \ -, , ~", \ " ''''::J:\, ". , L PI CU DRIVE _ L _ " ST~b}~53. N 1 E • , " -, " , \ -1'" • '. \ f"';' 1 ;:' ;.;:";";;I"~',;/,-,-,",.,---~;,~ . ~" 1" i , '< 1. 2. '" , , . I '11_11t-1'~!1 ' . -"'1 ,. 20 ~~+F:';tl(JST ·COMM EASEMENT. .".: \f r,..;;-':~ ..,' "; ~ (1< ,. , GENERAL NOTE 7' , , , ~, J J/; '. -! .\ , ; " . . ~, . , " '\' " , i , , _.' I I , :r,: , ' " ." J o l ;I: / / ;i ":Y ,)' ;'~);,'"\ ::N fl:l 'i_ c: . ;,\, .~!,/,';r?I">;<~ • 20 . ( 40 scale 1" = 20' feet , , //1 , I: " ,,' , I nbbj 111 South Jackson Street Seattle, Washington 98104 (206) 223-5555 Fax (206) 621-2300 Site Plan Review Documents MAGNUSSON KLEMENCIC ASSOCIATES I • Structural + Civil Engineers 1301 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3200 Seattle Washington 98101-2699 T: 206 292 1200 F: 206 292 1201 www.mka.c:om ~Valley Medical Center 400 South 43rd St Renton, Washington Valley Medical Center ---Expansion Project -----~---- Number Date By Description of Revisions Sheet Tille SITE PAVING AND GRADING PLAN SOUTH Scale Designed Drawn Date 2/25104 Checked Approved By Sheet Number Job Number RE'6°EivED APR 0 2 200~ BUILDING DIVISION C2.21 -----,--------------,--------_____________________ -----.J +- Q o C o :> if) +-30 en "- - > U C,' , I : I "" .' . <~.:./ .• L' \ ." ::-, ,'r' ~~Ac PVMt ':~PATCH _ - cp / '-: :. ___ L-__ _ ,I',;, ---------------------'----------------;--------------, , " , ' ~," '; / ) . t , ( , , ,J ; I ~.o • /" • '-, ALIGN WALK WITH EXIST WALL NOTES: 1. SEE SHEET C1. 01 FOR GENERAL NOTES, LEGEND AND ABBREV I A TI ONS. 2. SEE SHEET C1.02 FOR SITE PAVING AND GRADING NOTES. J 20 2 scale . \ , ' ~ . I " , ' , o 20 1" • 20' " .,~ I 40 ! feet ~. ), ~:"». ~ -' , , , , , ® '" ~-CONC WALK, TYP~ , , j 1, ',., C~3 CONC CURB, TYP8 C~2 TRAFFIC ARROW COR SPPAGE,HO:09 TYPE 1, TYP,; I PI CURB' N 164,396.22 E 1,298,995.39 " ' ~~AC PVMT TYPE " ,:'PI CURB j .'- , ' " ' , " ., ~ ~ 164,268.28 , '{'1,298,949.09 I, L12J" -"C~2 "I' I:. ,~ I ' , ; , " -, , " . :/ , '/ " i, ! '. f nbbj 111 South Jackson Street Seattle, Washington 98104 (206) 223-5555 Fax (206) 621-2300 Site Plan Review Documents MAGNUSSON I KLEMENCIC ASSOCIATES _. II Sfrudural + Civil Engineers 1301 Filth Avenue, Suite 3200 Seattle Washington 98101-2699 T: 206 292 1200 F: 206 292 1201 www.mka.c:om ~Valley Medical Center 400 South 43rd St Renton, Washington Valley Medical Center EX}J3lISiunPro~ct ----------------- ---------------- -,------------------ ----------- Number Date By Description of Revisions Sheet Title SITE PAVING AND GRADING PLAN NORTH Scale Designed DralWl Date 2125/04 Checked ----=~~--~ .A!Jproved By Job Number Sheet Number CITY OFRr~llgN--__ _ RECEIVED APR 022004 BUILDING DIVISION C2.22 __ -"-,~_-__ . ~L~~'-~ ___ ~~_,~ ____ ' , __ <;~'_~_~ __ ,/ ___ ~ ______ ,~t..:._=~,~"--_ -~' =-~-~--------------~ C 0> V +- 0. o C o 2 (f) +-'" Vl LL > U ill () o « o o '" o o N .... 'T N .... N ". .. , t, •• ' }\ '''" ;' '.~' /1' <, C" i !, ";::, I c" " :r' ~ -,!'~ : -, !' • ',<! ,:~ -;-'";' i. -,(;-.-. :. ,~., ,>~"::' CB TYPE II CORSP PAGE B027, TYP-...i,J CONN EXISnT~_.L_~:>~r{,r;, TO VAULT- , I -; '.\ t. " ,.' " .' '., j ,: ; I ' ~ ~ ;'- ."'; '. ,. , , ',.''i,~ 1--r~y:', ~[. :7'.' " <, , " " ')', " , -, , .-, " , / " I'"' 7 ,', " '." , ",,·.+~t';.:r: ! ,'. . i. SO. AT WALL \. r " ~ . 5 C2.31 C3.03 -----"'"'··.EXISJ ELEC EAsEMENT; .r.' -J:, +of ~..:..:..:..:~S~C:E. _G§NE~Ah J'l2.00,c:,:TE:...,7::,..' '""s-c~~~,,,:: _i~: __ ,.c-:~._~ •. ," ',/' .. " -, )~., " .'. / , j . , --.--~---------"-.".-,.------------------------------------------ i \, I I I~ LIMITS· OF I. . WORK, TYP I I I Ii/D'd . " ,- . \ .' " " , :" " NOTES; : ~:' , :' ,f ':' I '" !'.I f ,'f . ./ " tH ,It.~ ~'Ti' , '~-' ... "'. ,,' " -,,/ ! -! / ; " , . .. . , .' ,' .. , F,'-" , , , ,f ., , ;, .,,(,J /J I' 'I ,i{' 'I .. , , " " ,'" / SEE SHEET. C1 .01 FOR GENERAL NO~S, LEGEND AND ABBREV,lATIO~S. • ',f 2. , "'~' ; 'l~":r~~, ~ SEE SHEET C1.02 FOR UTIUITY·NOTES. , ' , '; \ , . " 20 ." , , , ,It • scale ::;: ~/ - o 20 1" = 20' \ ;11":'-; ::: ',1,O ,l- 1 ~ ~ '<'C;'y ~ij/.;' ~?1-';iS 40 ! feet .. ," I =,j nbbj 111 South Jackson Street Seattle, Washington 98104 (206) 223-5555 Fax (206) 621-2300 Site Plan Review Documents MAGNUSSON KLEMENCIC ASSOCIATES I • Structural + Civil Engineers 1301 Filth Avenue, Suite 3200 Seollie Washington 98101-2699 T: 206292 1200 F: 206 292 1201 www.mka.com ~Valley Medical Center 400 South 43rd St Renton, Washington Valley Medical Center Expansion Project Number Date ---'- SheetTme UTILITY PLAN SOUTH Scale De~gned Dete 2/25104 ApprOlied By Sheet Number By Description of Revisions Drawn Checked Job Number RECE/'VED APR 02 2004 BUILDING DIVISION C2.31 > u ~ <t o o --------------------------------------------------------""·c,-~'-_C_O'--',~~·-----------------------'-----, f, I 0____.. I "~<,' ':<:' • l' ,: ~'" h";-"I~' " ! ! ','" '" ~_--LI_, , , / I / " '/ I '5'-' , ----.. I I , ----.. 1----.. NOTES: 1. SEE SHEET Cl.0l FOR GENERAL NOTES, LEGEND AND ABBREVIATIONS. 2. SEE SHEET Cl .02 FOR UTILITY NOTES. i' LIMITSor.J • WORK, ryp " , .' , .' " , " , , , . , ,~ , " " . " .:' ., ' , , . . ' , .~ , ' , '.' -; , .. 'i," --;;'. ,~ , ' , ,'{ L ',' , '.: :;\ ~; 1 ,._~.~)" ;: ',:,; 1",; '. f',~"/' ~.~ ,\ ':)"'·/"H.: £,: ~, ",!;.,,~, ,A~':~F . ::1 ;<:. «',!'ii; '/'~_ .. ' " , ..' MATCHLINE SEE -',,',, __ 'I ~ I I ..... ';" ... i I .... I I _ I I _ 'I _ I I / i ,1 nbbj 111 South Jackson Street Seattle, Washington 98104 (206) 223-5555 Fax (206) 621-2300 Site Plan Review Documents I MAGNUSSON KLEMENCIC ASSOCIATES -.- Structural + Civil Engineers 1301 Filth Avenue, Suite 3200 Seattle Washington 981 01 ~2699 T: 206 292 1200 F: 206 292 1201 www.mko.com ~Valley Medical Center 400 South 43rd St Renton, Washington Valley Medical Center -ExpansiOn TrOject -- ---------_._- Number Date SheetTdIe UTILITY PLAN NORTH Scale Designed Date Approved By Sheet Number 2125/04 By Description 0/ ReVisions Drawn Checl<ed Job Number C2.32 , \ \ 1', \ c )/ '/ / \ I \ I , \ \. \ --. \ \ \ \\ \ \. \ \ \. \. \ \ \ \ \. \ \ I \ \ \ \ \ \. \, \ \. \ \. \ \ \ \ \ I \ \ \ \. I I I \ \.--'\ ) \ / ! /,,'-' ,/ ~\ ! \ ( \. \ \ \. '\ \ \ \ \ \. \ I. I \ I. ... \ \ , I \. \. \ \ \ \ I \ I 1----·- I I C· : __ i ___ ---!. __ , I , I 1 _____ · , I i--@-- 1_-.-_-, __ - ! <:' \ ! \ \ ~--'---~ -~-~ ----------7------------------ , I .. -_ ... ----~-----a:' , , ____ ~-::l-:: ______ . ., , --'4~ --"-, -------~----- "----. I . I __ . ___ 1, I , I I .. I I,,; I -~ -.----; I ~ ; I ' , ----,. ---I : , , ~ I < " / / ': ,:---"-'\ .,1 \1 ':1 ) ,'I .1 ._-----·1 'I ,,J ---~~" I , ------!I I I __________ I :: '\ , '. I I I ------1 .1 , --_____ '1 I " '1 --limP\---. I \:J' '1 I --i +- /" ---~-- C/-----··· ,~ ," EXISTING TO REMAIN NEW SITE PLAN o 20:. ____ ~----~60. ~ ; SCALE: AS INDICATED os indicated feet ;. ?~iF'~)~'~~ ~= ~ .... .. -.' -' l ~ '-1-._~~_?:=:~:::~""- i~ :~ '--~-, \ , , \ " I' ! \ / MAIN HOSPITAL ~-- / ~~7 / :r--=-" = , .' I, ! 1 I' 1 i I I..~~,"=,",="",~"""-"""~~~",,,,-=,,,~~-~", '""" --"""-' __ : ::""'_;.0-:";;'" ;~-....;, _ ~,=-'~"::::~~(:_"~~~~~"'''''t:'~;~~'~~~''''-~~'::~~.-~ ~<~, -r·" if9"Vi~--i~z;~~ " :;~/ ~~~-=;,.~~{;"'~~"~:ZL ~~'~~~~:~i/~ ~t~};Y ,"(; ---c2: ~ " \. o T -r:"-'d' r"'=-~' l' I I: II X " \ ,,::~:~:;-~~~). / , I 1/ " ;' '. , I \ ' _-.J/_\:!_ l'l-.\F- -'~=2I~" ,/" \ : i~ ----....,-, ~,fr-~ ,./ ,-' ir-=-~~rJ l >, Il, ..... ~;:...~=-.""-=_',._~=-_"'_-~~ , "V"-9-~O;:~~~-'V""'-"<;7,?-V-i; '~'i-~""" ---,=,"~ (\ , , ! '. -~---:-----.---';~ .. -----r-----.--::::::::; .. ,""--0 ~ :;;::---::-= =-::::--::---=c I ~= &.:1 --.. -' = = = = e.~ = = = L-=: = ~~ ~ .. ----c:::;----- ;: c:=. '------_._----- = =. = = c--= = = = = = !: = ~-;;::, = = = 6. ,,' a~ ~t;e.~ ----_._----_._-- ---_ ... _---------------- nbbj 111 Sooth Jackson Street S¢attle. Washilgtoo 98104 1206) 223-5555 F<lX 1206) 621-2300 Construction Documents QC Printing l-f SPARLING EI E'CTFUCAL ENGI~EFUNG I TECHNOLOGY CONSUL TING tJOOl.ve Way Suite 140() S/.'.ttle. W..,hmgtOTl ~~:OH553 2f)6-{;S7 or"..-", 800-5151-lXilQ hu:: 206-S67-055~ www.splZl"ling.cmn 02 26 2(\05 I 'tVcilley Medical Center 400 South 43rd St Renton, Washington Valley Medical Center Expansion Project Architectural Lighting Consultants 720 Olive Way. Suite 1400 Seattle, WA 98101-1853 206/667,0511 • Fax: 206/667-0512 www.candeJa.com -------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ------c:---,----..... ~_" __ -d- NEW SITE LIGHTING PLAN M; NOTED AAU -----------_._-------------------------_._-----_. __ ._.-... 01/30/04 JED RETCOERI' ~ APR 02 004 BUILDING DI ISION 24882.46 EO.03 E 20'-0' ® ~;'l~T ELEVATION " II 'i , --------'--u c----'r-'_ -,-' - ---' -,-' ~-+-"" , "j i", ,! k :· ----------------, I , I ---+111--------fIlllll D A BB DD EE 20'-0' 20'-0' 20'-0' 20'-0' 20'-0' 20'-0' 20'-0' 20'-0' 20'-0' 20'-0' " j I --~----r-------~---------~~--il! ------r-'---'---" ,', iii , I 1-1-----r-~----I ------~1--~----1----~--I----~ ~-------~---~-I-r=rTl-' __ '-~~ iii ~~~ii~--tr-;I--~~~-'~'-:-~~~~~ 9-~-I 1----- c 20'-0' 20'-0' " , " -"-'--'--r'-' , Ii: II 'Ili I' I:: , ' ,!I i: (iD ~~~TH ELEVATION ® SOUTH ELEVATION 1" = 8'-0' A AA 2Q'-0" • • 1 ._ , ,. c " " I' , "I II ,: I 1'1': +-4-,1--+t~--I h+-~ '--I~I -----L!.-...u-~ :L-"-~'I'! '-+!-,-I : ,-'I -" ""~"~ ,_- 11':'1 "I,]::: 'I,'l, I:' ," :' I , I: 1'1 ,I' ::!' 1,1 'i I ,I i' : I :, Ii: !.l_ C'--'+-'~ -+tt!f'--:r---T-I' "'-lh: ::' I! i: ,! :!" ,i: I i i'l :.' I I" , I, I l' I " I I : I I II' I:',: "I'H': ,~,: "==+*=.,; =±tl= ir ': I I Ii, I I -':J-+--'4:---r :;'" !. 1,=:,1' ',I, 1=, , +f+---i-ill.-t'-i: -Ii: I:' -'II I", I' I I I i: .I: I, 'I, I ' , : ~ :: , ! :: I': , I: i i : : 'I' ,: 11 :' I ,I' I ':1 , 'I' !, J ~, L :: :. I' " ' !, ii Ii '" Ii' I: , II I I :' 11 Ii Ii I 'r Ii' ':: II 'I I:'! :,' I II I, , I, " -'.1-"'-_ '~' I~-,:. '!"--"'-I'i--'4l+-f.- ,i, " " j' I: , i' , ' , " " I; " I,. I', , ' jl' 'i ~ ",;,.,--' ': ------'4-0-. , I:' , ,I' 'I' I, ' I' , I" " , ' " , " ", cc DD EE FF 20'-0' 20'-0' ~-~-----------------~------------------'-+- , ~, " "LcL~,l ~:d~I:::~::~:' : =;=~ " ---------==t=::: -------'--'+'--=-=-.~-::'..-'-----/ =--' -"-"". -' .~I=t:= " 'i I I , I I I I ~Ii·-·-·-·-·~----·--~--·--·-·~· , I I I I 10 9 20'·0' -.~----If-YoHTE STUCCO " , , , , :: " i, " , i " , ' GlASS IIlNDOW i I, , i, ' , I :' "'~~'1--' ---. tt--------- 'Ilir r 'I' I ;,1 I',' " I ;,1 I ':1' " ~ " i' I I I: : : I 'II . I I: :, 1:1:1,1 IUI::"I.' !, I , : i I: 'I ;: 1,', I i :r; I, I " I' I I i ': ", ,Ii 'I' I " : :.f I, : II 'i", ::' i;! 4...J'-iti:':i'f ~ _1w..l ~::i , 11-,-~ -~ +_-.c!Cll __ ,_,_ -,------1.---____ --'.1. _____ .. __ II'i i:;1 " I I, !II: :,,! ' :! , , ,I:,~ , J " I, : :, " .. ; ,; :':1 :: ' ,I, 'i' i'l , " I , ,I,' ,', "" I I,; 1'1 ,I,· : :'1 :' ' " I I :! ,I' I I,,! : !:I i, I' , " ,I " , , I I i II ' ,I " ' I ,:', , ': ,I' i i ! I", " i, i ,'I "II I I I'·' . I , J I , I i I I:': : ,I I I I :,: ,i, I, ": ,I[ ~i"', 1*,' ~ ii' I I ." I "'--""I'~~ .• 'J __ .'.-__ , _____ --":' __ '-"'::: __ .:.,.-~ __ ~_ .'_.1_ I ___ '_.J ____ ~--=-~Bf6 ____ . __ NEW PED, BRIDGE ", , NEll. FIR. 104.50' ROOF 102. JRD flOOR 90.00 flOOR 78.00 EXTERIOR VARIES '" I 'b I N - $ PARAPET LE\{l EL: 104.5' $ CANOPY LE\{l El: 102.0' \0 I 'b I N $ 3RDFLOOR 90,00' $ 2ND FLOOR 78.00' $ lSTFLOOR 66,O() EXTERIOR VARIES 'b w I ~ nbbj 111 South Jackson Street Seattle, Washington 98104 (206) 223-5555 Fax (206) 621-2300 Site Plan Review Documents G \ REG'STERED ARCHITECT JAMES R HOBBS .\ srlll£Of WARI.INmON ~lO'lllI!S l"~ ~ Vcilley Medical Center 400 South 43rd St Renton, Washington Valley Medical Center Expansion Project 19&20 1lJ ,---,-L J S 0- I 11 & 12 * E9N --- ------ ------ ------ ---Number o.t. By Descrfptlon of Revisions --- Sheet TItle EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Scot. 118"= I'· 0" Designed AJ Oro .. AJ, VS Date 02£25/04 Check'" GG App,O'Ie<I By JRH Job Number 24882.46 Sheet Number A3.01-8 CITYOp,~ RECEt'VED I) A, :~ 0 .I o"D' .. ' ... 1 BUILDING DIVISION <f ~ "" ~ C5 "" w w en :z 0 !;;( => :z i= :z 0 <.> 0:: 0 LL. = = = = = EAST ELEVATION 1" = 8'-0" 20'-0' I STUCCO 20'-0' BI-PARlING GlASS DOOR SURGERYENlRANCE 20'-0' ~)=EA~S~T=EL=EV~A~TI=O~N ______________ ~~_ ~ 1"=8'-0" 1:\2tlJ},)2~ OG'2~S82 46\'litep~ilnrf'1Iiew\A~~Ot_36x2~~A·B.cm'9 PEDESTRIAN BRIDG: l 20'-0' 20'-0' '---WHITE STUCCO ENTRIoNCE DROP-CFF f13\ _PA-,--R,--TI_AL_N--,E ___ W~EN,-,--T~RA ___ N-,C_E_NO-,,-R_T __ H -,--EL_EV_A_T ___ IO_N ____ _ ~ 1" =8'..()" i'124BB~_ OO'24882_4S1,si:c pi<1rJ r:vi(';w\A3_0i_26~{.!-_.t\"3dy,g .... TOP OF SKYLIGHT -'1" 'I"" EL: 122.5' b I 1:0 A NEW ROOF LEVEL -4-'I"" EL: 114.5' 20'-0' 20'-0' , , / , , , / / / 20'-0· / / , , / / / , , , SINGLE SUDE GlASS DOOR PRE-OPjPOST-OP Em PENTHOUSE STUCCO COlUMN v.tNOOW CIl'ICRETE Ill-PARTING GlASS DOOR HOSPITAL ENTRANCE 20'-0' 20'-0' A TOP OF SKYliGHT 'I"" EL: 122.5' YlllTE STUCCO EL: 114.5' ~~ $ EXISTING CANOPY LVL. EL: 102.00' ---'~ $ 3RDFLOOR 20'-0' 6 $ PARAPET l£IIEI. El; 104.5' ~ $CANOPYl£IIEI. El.: 102.0' L---CLE.AR GlASS \\1NOOW -i.--lfiITE STUCCO $ lHIRD FLOOR l£I{l E~ 90.0' b c!, - fs\ PARTIAL WEST ELEVATION @ SURGERY STAIR ~ 1M= 8'..()" !·V~FI3<. ()O\{4B8~_,t5\srt!3 plan r(";I(:\'}\ll,3_~ 0: .. _ 2·5:t2·LP.g O'i.:.; $ PARAPET l£IIEI. E~ 105.0' b I $ CANOPy l£IIEI. El.: 102.0' GlASS v.tNDOW • 0 STUCCO I N - LINES $ THIRD FLOOR l£IIEI. El.: 90.0' A TOP OF SKYliGHT -4-'I"" EL: 122.5' b I 1:0 A NEW ROOF LEVEL _-+ 'l'"" EL: 114.5' EXISTING CANOPY LVL EL: 102.00' STUCCO GlASS \\1NOOW CIl'ICRETE CANOPy EXISTING CANOPYLVL EL: 102.00' -,r-~--------------------------------------------------------.. ----------------------------------------------------------------.--~~--~ f12\ _PA_R_TI_AL_N_E_W_E_NT_RA_N_C_E_W_ES_T_E_LE_V_AT_IO_N ____ __ ~ 1" = 8'-0" I \2488~_ 00\24832 W~ 46'.5110 pian ri;vip,v;,,;\2:...... G 1 __ 3b2'~J,~B ,1'1.g 5 Ir~---------® -~=-~,~-O" T_IA_L_N_E_W_E_NT_RA_N_C_E_, ~-f~-2 ~-'~_~B_2E_:,_:~-p~-m ~-"~'?-W'~-3_-01_-:lt-";"-l;--.s.-dW9 _-\--(:t.EAR GlASS STUCCO L-_-----METAL COlUMN r--EX1S11NG CONCRElE CANOPY A TOPOF SKYLIGHT 'I"" EL: 122.5' -'1k- A NEW ROOF LEVEL _-+ -.;:pr-cL: 114.5' lo I N - CITYCIIl RECE EXISTING CANOPY LVL EL: 102.00' APR 0 BUILDINCi nbbj 111 South Jackson Street Seattle, Washington 98104 (206) 223-5555 Fox (206) 621-2300 Site Plan Review Documents G \ REGISTERED ARCHITECT JAMES R HOBBS I I SJATEOFWASII'INGfON 1!'xP0lE81t--1t-U '®'Vcill.ey Medical Cettter 400 South 43rd St Renton, Washington Valley Medical Center Expansion Project --, ~1r ~S 0- 11 * "13 'I ..... EBN 19&20 ---- -- ----- -- ---- -- -- -- --Number Date By Oesaiptton of ReviIlon, ---- Sheet nUe EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS s..;. 11811= 1'· 0" Oeslgned AJ Ilnron AJ,VS Date 02/25/04 Choef<ed GG Approwd By JRH Jab Number 24882.46 Sheet NYmber EVON ~ 2~o~A3.01-A [ IVISION - (CO) (CO) co -a::-CI) (CO) (R-8) (CO) PROJECT AREA S 43RD ST (CO) (CO) (CO) ~ ~ (CO) :f? (CO) <:::>,~ (CO) (CO) (CO) 45TH PL (co) (co) (RM-I) (RM-I) (RM-I) (CO) (CO) C/) 0 (CO) a::- I- (CO) 0 CD .....J (CO) j:! (CO) (R-14) (R-8) S 38TH ST (R-8) (CO) (CO) (CO) (CO) ,-.,; ..... I 0:: ....., -.,.... I 0:: ....., -.,.... I 0:: ....., -.,.... J: (R-1) ....., (RM-I) (R-1) (R-1) (RMH) ------------ o 100 200 400 , '~~I _iiiiiiiiii' SCALE: 1"=200' RESIDENTIAL ~R-1) RESIDENTIAL 1 dulac R-8) RESIDENTIAL 8 dulac RM-I) RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY IN FILL COMMERCIAL (CO) COMMERCIAL OFFICE CITY LIMITS nbbj 111 South Jackson Street Seattle, Washington 98104 (206) 223-5555 Fax (206) 621-2300 Site Plan Review Documents REGISTERED ARCHITECT JAMES R. HOBBS STATE OFWASBINGTON EXPIRF81t-lO-4N '~Valley Medical Center 400 South 43rd St Renton, Washington Valley Medical Center Expansion Project Number Date By Description of Revisions -'--- Sheet Title NEIGHBORHOOD DETAIL MAP Scale 1" = 200' Designed AJ Drown Date 02/25/04 Checked Approved By JRH Job Number 24882.46 Sheet Number AD.DO , \ , , '.~'" " t' ' .. ... ~ ' ....... .. ' \ .-, "~''J' ';-" ,~ , " .. , .' J.l:"';.~ , \ " " " ". ' ~; : :~ ·~,-~'I .. • '- '" \. ,) :-.... . , ~ '. " " / .,-.' " , '; ·'t " .I . '" '", .-' '~: ~." .'~ " , "I;': . '. / T: ------~~.-------------------------------- I • MAGNUSSON KLEMENCIC ASSOCIATES Structural + Civil Engineers 1301 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3200 Seattle Washington 98101-2699 206292 1200 F: 2062921201 www.mka.com ""';"..;.. .. ~:.: ... -.. ....:.~:',!.: .. -.. -.. -.. -.. ~ .. - ... '" .' . J.>. ,;~ " r, f.., , ,- 20 H .coI. o 20 40 ..... Inl As SfofOWl't ,I ill! __ ~ c O. D o , OJ .9 u )- '-u J I ) U) o UJ U' LL u VI " Ll o " ~lo ".> ,'!i-,>~?' -------------------}------I-:- .' i " . , I'., II ~ I~r~r I _ " _ II _II _ 11_ ~ ,.'1 -' < ~ '. - / I / - I " , ! .,it: If(_\)\ 1"1'-1 ."f' ~, " 'J' " --, / ! , / ! , , " I , , , , \' }' \ "":~ 'I' " , , , , -1', , " " ' TREATED STORM )WATER 'DISCHARGE -i----+-<' / " " / \ " I I ! , , , - J f _'f.: -c,-, ',": -., ., . ' :\ -, \ ·c' , , " '\' --:-:.'" ) r' -I I, I -'",,) ,],"'.-1"'. IL ~l., ',.{;:,''', S· , " I / " \ , " " , , ) ! , 'C , ' ., -..,. -. ;~~--. /" ;; ,/ .\' ---------------c;.-'~ ~):; "-II _II _11_ II _ 11_ I' _ 11,_11 ., '>~, ) '. k' ,J, (f "', '~'-1 ~.' \ • / I '~~ -' ...-------/ ~' 'i)' , -" " ) , " -: , -r---~COLLECTj'ON POINT, .,;' FOR DISCHARGE fO , SEDIMENT TREATMENT. SEE TESC NOTL12 " ' SWALE, TYP 5 C2.01 C3.01 \. \ ,,' / , ! , INTERCEPTQR~ "'II ' : Ih~ I , :~'EXIST ELEC EASEM~Nt, SEE GENER~L NOTE 7 f , , " " , , , , \ , '- , , , , i -- " , . , , , _1-.. ___ ~,I-II-1 , j " / , " j , / J I , J , 1~ , 'I~ , , . , ' ,/ ,F ,."",,-,', -,",,:,;::". __ --;"'::'.':". _-:; ct. // .~ " ' , .~~' "' "> / " i '" -:fu .... · / / I ",,' , , ' i I i , \ \ ,-" )"=""",:'" r~:' :' '~:.,: / i ;:j',: l,~,~) 1!IlH ,,)," \ ". i -! , , \ , . '" , >.' '" \ )1-; , , • '1~ '" ! I , -, , ';(:' -/~ i ~, f ! ! , -- , ! , J , r ,I . , -, \ I -\' , , \ -\ ~'" , ~ l_/I,~ , , I , / / , , " i ! 20 scole , r\ -(>~\ ' 'J,," ,f-..,. ," ,/ -[ ',~" .'\' "~I / " , " , , , " l):,P " ! --_.!., ,', / o 20 1" = 20' , " , . , 'J ,', ',.;; v ->11 _ ; <, , , , , " , , I _11 __ ,_ I "~I .' ,-, , ! / / ! / J ' 40 , feet I j ! j _ 'r -I -I I ,I I "I il .\ /' ",' , - ~ ", .~,:; , , , , !I" , . " .: " , , 1 ~, , -,' ) ,/ , " , , , , " , ' I " , J .' ' 111 South Jackson Street Seattle, Washington 98104 (206) 223-5555 Fax (206) 621-2300 Site Plan Review Documents MAGNUSSON KLEMENCIC ASSOCIATES Structural + Civil Engineers 1301 F,fth Avenue, Suite 3200 Sea~le Washington 98101-2699 T: 206292 1200 F: 206 292 1201 www.mka.com ~Valley Medical Center Number Sheet Tille 400 South 43rd St Renton, Washington Valley Medical Center Expansion Project Date By Description of ReVisions TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN SOUTH Scale DeSigned Drawn Date 2/25/04 Checked Approved By Job Number Sheet Number C2.01 II I I L 1)1 L GJ U , N Y ~ (] >. " Q) 'J. L :J u, ()l c: J:c, ;: t/l 0J '" ;'1 " 'J, ';1 ,;,;, -."' J ,,", '_"I,le,''''" ')1 'J i "' I ' ", )' -, .' 'J \,'. . " /-c:\.'~Z; 0':") ,.... " I d,i / ! . / / ,j.'~, .1 ~._ ;:1">:.! ~q. !:~ !.'-'. ',! \ t \ " ,~;::';:~-'/, -:. " r;"1 ;"J, > •• -,\ ~ , , " , , Fe: ~;~ <.';. , .. ~'.' ):'l" 1< " !' I ; ......... ~I ," I {,/<i\~ I ' "1> { .. ! J'\ \t '" ,. '" "_" " t I,~ >,' - " : ',I , • , , ,', .. '; : 11~ , , , , , ' " 2;:' < ~JJ~ " ' if,,'. SEE LANDSCAPE/PLUMBING DWGS FOR TESC MEASURES ;,;,;;: ,:9YE,R EXIST,STRUCT---;------.. , ,'> :' ii " . ",-/' ""n; i'/1:.' i , J ,;' / .,' ~. ; " I i' . i j~,,:;,-~ rI"'! ~ " , /), • r ': -'. 1 • .-',.;;... 1.1 i ;.j , J ,,0 " <,\<.~. /' -,', ! " I' /i I,' 'j .; ;:: ,~.~' . " ,',t), ~ I " .' L,' , " ) i /~ ',;.1 i"M ,~ Ji \ . .- ,: \ ,"(,' ( '\ " "((!,;> c~:, i ",: '; ! '-..'''' i "I:; , ,/ "':~ / ! ~, ! , " ! ! : 11j i , . , '-, ',' , / / , NOTES: 1. SEE SHEET Cl. 01 FOR GENERAL NOTES, LEGEND AND ABBREVIATIONS. 2. SEE SHEET Cl.02 FOR TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL NOTES. L .-<~" 1, ~ .' \,1 ) , '/"-;, . ! " ) . J ," • !'{;r,.r.' ! , , ) / ! , , ! ! i .1 "--<- 20 scale ~l 5,1 ! ,I ! ,,1!:-" .<' 'J; ",' I ',; ,"" 0\;"1 !~ I' '1 j,,, , , o 1" = 20' i , , 20 I, ; ,! ! f , J , , " ! , , I , ' . {: ,1/ ! " " ' ,I 4d J feet ! , " ... "" :, _ '1;:- ",the,;;,) ,'), " , " <, , i • . , ; ~ I ! , ',I ) _"' _,~,.'T- 'i 111 South Jackson Street Seattle, Washington 98104 (206) 223-5555 Fax (206) 621-2300 - Site Plan Review Documents MAGNUSSON KLEMENCIC ASSOCIATES Slructural + Civil Engineers 1301 Fifih Avenue, Suite 3200 Sea«le Washington 98101-2699 T: 206 292 1200 F: 206 292 1201 www.mka.com ~Valley Medical Center Number 400 South 43rd St Renton, Washington Valley Medical Center Expansion Project Dale By Description of Revisions SheetTitle TEMPORARY EROSION AN.D,. ____ _ SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN NORTH Scale DeSigned Drawn Date 2/25/04 Checked Approved By Job Number Sheet Number C2.02 c 0' CJ c +- Q o o ::2: CJ +- ~ L C1 ." " '!j' , [ t I ! ,- i I I, I ! ! , , ',' ,C6 TYPE II " 'COR SP PAGE 6027, TYP-~ CONN EXISlTTJS~D_~~S~rirz TO VAULT,- , f " , / ,,: : / , : } ,( I) r " L r /: q' ~.*'> ' ,'," '~'~t' ., ..... i .', ,< .. :,l. ( .= 94.50 I 8"'= 92.00 (SE) ·IE •• JZ::~ = 92.00(W) "-,,,. -.~, ~~"",".;r .. -__ .",o:.-~:. " C'", ,," ";:--~'--"_"'./, .. !,,/-.,.J ":;:"-'<-'::'C.. ._. _": __ ,"' ,I' , , 1 -____ J. ~ -.".-;-;-"--"'.-,,_.' , """~ , j,'\,(Jf • ,,11 t/-/'.'. "h·: . i. 1 'l;,'j ;:,\ ,,' \ ., ' , . ;. .... , . , . , , i I, \'. l;j~" -"~"~~" " :1:: \, ?"..; , " , ,.<\ j::~:}\ , " , - , , ,,' v " , II~,II- IE 4" = 76.50 (S) IE 12" = 82.71 (S) IE 12" = 75.2 (N) EXIST ", '. " '" \ "~J:.:::'-.,-' . '" '''''./'"_ , , " c , , -' .~ ,. / ! , I " , , I· ! .. "I \' , : ' !f,1 ·'1'~I('\k,' .. J -, ! / / 0' , I , ! ! I ! 'ii '/' " f / , r: ,. _ --I i 1'" \ \ , I I , I \ ;::';',1 "("I £,;, ~ '. '" -, . , . " . " 0" , , \ \' \ , I I . i " . r . , \ '" ~\ -. \' --, i I' 7 i ' . \ / ... , LIMITS OF /WOR,K!TYP / ! , , . , \ / I I \ \ . '" ! i I ., , , ! , , j . , i ! I / , / , ! j' ! .. \ , ~C''j - ·h .t , ./ / r;· , " , I' , / I ! !. , , .J NOTES:',. 1. SEE SHEEr Cl ; 01 \ ,2, " I, ;, ,', ; \ "I'",,, SEIi';SHEE'T\Cl ~'02 I . 'I i~ ,. , " -I ' , . • ! :r"'A~~":f , f I , -(i,> {~'><:~J~ , '--,) ,J ,'i "<, ;' , ~:/!-, ' r , f " , , ! I rf'-'--,-~~--",EXI ST COMM EASf~ENT, i' SEE GENERAl:, NOTE 7. " , ' , I., i .. , ! , !' -, ,~ I " , .' <; '-" I ", r / , \ I \ I \ , , FOR GENERAL NOTES, II .{ ,', ) , '1-1 ' , FOR UTILItY'NOTES. 1,_ 1., ,S 'hA0' r'!~ f ! , I 20 scale i' I , T' I o 1" = 20' , , I ! .' f , ,,' ., (' , , , , ! , " ! \~ .. J i' rJj .. ' 20 i " , , i !\-JJ ./ ! ' 0" II ;' ,} I~ (;; __ ~ -" 'IJ;'~~ I': 40 I feet / , , , . , I" ---- ii , '( 1 ,j" , " , , ' " / I r , ,i / " , /' \ , .. \ . bbj 111 south Jackson Street Seattle, Washington 98104 (206) 223-5555 Fax (206) 621-2300 Site Plan Review Documents MAGNUSSON KLEMENCIC ASSOCIATES Structural + Civil Engineers 1301 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3200 SeaMle Washington 98101-2699 T: 2062921200 F: 206 2921201 www.mka.com -\ ~Valley Medical Center Number 400 South 43rd St Renton, Washington Valley Medical Center Expansion Project Date By Description of Revisions Sheet Title UTILITY PLAN SOU,T,~H~ ________________ ___ Scale Designed Drawn ---, _Oa_Ie ___ ,2125/04 Checked Approved By Job Number ------~~~------ Sheet Number C2.31 u :-,.j", /' r'·"} L I" ," G L . V' U ::;> ~ + Co o , o H Vl 't . , U '" [' 'T , " , , \' f): is ,;.(" Ij\ , ;, . r -<'~ f "/' , ,f, f , . "; , . I' 11_11_11_11_ / , , )f' i ,1" " ,~I ~ I ", '. \' 'Jr :, C\ , ' ---~------------------------ ~, I' !~'----- / , i (jJ / "I~ / ::/~) '" ( , . / ~~,y / / l~'~.~ '~'----'---C)Ti' ,,7",c,---!, I I, n I ' / ;', >i'"' • ;1 I 'j '''f'< 'f i! ,i " j • " I I / i I( !! ,IT ,I '/ c; .to " '" It j) '~,\' CjJ / ~/ / f , , / ~~. "'-, / / $, ! , , , [ NOTES: i I. SEE SHEET Cl.Ol FOR GENERAL NOTES, LEGEND AND ABBREVIATliONS. 2. SEE SHEET Cl.02 FOR UTILITY NOTES. " " , < '1, ; ~ '~:.,J]. ~" • I " 20 scale \ :.J': , '7 / i , . ". . ... f-'- ::;;'?Jc:.....-.!./ AOJUS( CB RUil' ! TO MATCH ,FINISH " GRADE, TYP ! " " l' ,"-' " '! c,' " " , :' o 1" = 20' I i ! , 'u~\'J~(; L-i:r' 1); [J .J1,o·~ ~). " ,,~ I , 20 , ! / 'J' !t ;, '('1' I;!!?; ! ! ! ! ! 40 ! ; feet: /' ) ,. f , : .~?~j~ 1 "', { " \ , I i!'.'~~ lIt '\f~:--~!A/J , , ~,\' , " ! " , ,,' ."1 , , ; I "',; (! , , bj 111 South Jackson Street Seattle, Washington 98104 (206) 223-5555 Fax (206) 621-2300 Site Plan Review Documents MAGNUSSON KLEMENCIC ASSOCIATES Strudural + Civil Engineers 1301 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3200 SeaHle Washington 98101·2699 T: 206 292 1200 F: 206 292 1201 www.mka.com ~Valley Medical Center Number Sheet Title 400 South 43rd St Renton, Washington Valley Medical Center Expansion Project Dale By DeSCription of ReviSions UTILITY PLAN NORT',C,H-'---__ Scale Designed DralMl Date 2125/04 Checked Approved By Job Number Sheet Number C2.32 r\~ F ACE OF WALL OR CURB TYP , SEE PLAN Cl--------- TRENCH DRAIN +-9---------- 4" MIN CONC ENCASEMENT ALL AROUND (TYP) / PLAN FINISH GR SEE PLAN ADE -\ ~ . · . · · · . c:J > l-e> lLJ en ~L=0,6% TO OUTLET<-<-. . . . . . . . . . . . . IE SEE PLAN U~OUTLET SEE PLAN FOR LOCATION AND SIZE SECTION A TRENCH DRAIN NTS 8" DIA INLET ----t-~ EXIST 8" DIA INLET --, · . · . . · . .' . 16'-6" T r\ A SECT A I~ FACE OF BLDG BELOW Ly GRATING SEE PLAN FOR RIM EL PAVEMENT AS SHOWN ---I : ,11l1§ "'" PRECAST POLYESTER : : 4" CONC CHANNEL , ,-~- 1--'\r~ IN IDE DIMENSION SECTION 8 LADDER-- BAFFLE -~ ---------------- ALIGN WITH TOP OF EXIST STRUCTURE -- IMPERMEABLE BARRIER--~ EXIST STRUCTURE --------, JE, SEE PLAN 4"111 PERF ID---+---" , , , , FINISH GRADE ~ FIL TER FABRIC -WASHED ROCK , , 4' , '~~r------~ , , , , , , ~ INTERCEPTOR DRAIN NTS (2) SOLID LOCKING COVER MARKED "DRAI N", RENTON SP PAGE B074, LOCATE OVER LADDER, TYP \ RIM EL 89.3± '~ GRADE RING, RENTON SP PAGE B035 -- -- 12" DIA OUTLET -- - _ 0.. 11111""l11l~ : i I 12" PREMANUF ACTURED DRAIN BASIN l-I (!) i:iJ I I- EB > z ~ lLJ ...J c:J « ~ 0:: « > I ~-COORD PT i' ON PLAN I ! IE IN IE OUTI ---,---~ -W AREA DRAIN NTS - EL 86.50 [----- ~ EL 85.50 x « -w ::;E WQ DESIGN WS I FINISH GRADE V-: ROP-TEE, RENTON SP PAGE B029 ORIFICE *2 EL 84.10, DIA 1,88" RIFICE *3 EL 85.35, DIA 1.75" N o SHEAR GATE ON TEE ----?> <1 '-') o FROP-TEE-~,,~ ----------------~-~~~~-SFSE~Ct~~ON INLET EL 78.80 P ----?> ->-~I-l"DI~ -----------------~ PIPE I ~-BAFFLE ~ '---. i SHEAR GATE, RENTON =: S ~ G OUTLET EL 81.86 EAL WI NON-SHRINK ROUT, TYP I J) 5J > u /, L ID ry I CJ U) U ;;. , , ~- +- Ci o Q) U C) 'Il := s: ,/l 2' (L 0') ("'J -J o o ,'J " '-N c.J --- NOTES: 12" DIA INLET---,J COORD PT ON PLAN -----' EXIST 8" DIA INLET VENTILA TI ON PIPE (4" DIA MIN) 33'-0" PLAN 1. VAULT LID TO BE CAPABLE OF SUPPORTING HS-20 LOADING PLUS IMPACT LOADS. 2. AT THE CONTRACTOR'S OPTION, A CAST-IN-PLACE VAULT IS ALLOWED. PROVIDE WATER STOPS AT ALL CAST-IN-PLACE CONSTRUCTION JOINTS. PRECAST VAULTS SHALL HAVE APPROVED RUBBER GASKET SYSTEM. 3. STRUCTURAL DESIGN CALCULATIONS SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR AS WELL AS SUBMITTED TO AND APPROVED BY THE CITY OF RENTON PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. STORMWATER DETENTION VAULT NTS /' .. " 4" DIA DRAIN COORD PT ON PLAN EL 77.00 SEDIMENT STORAGE~ ---LADDER z ,-<.0 ~ SP PAGE B035~,---;:: ::;;:::-:' .~. . ;:",:,? "":""':"":~ .. '.', "'"---... ~., ,~""7":":--:-:-:':~.~ ~.7'"':""".':-::-,".:--:;-r." .~'." \ L 2.5" DIA ORIFICE I I PIPE 16'-6" I , SECTION 0 R I L4 RIFICE *1 DIA 2.63" ENTON SP PAGE B035 " DIA DRAIN ------------ 12" ROUND GRATE FINISH GRADE -PROVIDE INLET & OUTLET :::l ADAPTORS AS REQD « 0:: lLJ > I-o I lLJ~ ...JW c:J I « 5: « > '---+-DIA AS SHOWN ON PLAN bj 111 South Jackson Street Seattle, Washington 98104 (206) 223-5555 Fax (206) 621-2300 Site Plan Review Documents MAGNUSSON I KLEMENCIC ___ ~_.~_ ASSOCIATES • Structural + Civil Engineers 1301 Fifth Avenu", Suite 3200 Seattle Washington ?81 01-2699 T: 206 292 1200 F: 206 292 1201 www.mko.com ~Valley Medical Center 400 South 43rd St Renton, Washington Valley Medical Center Expansion Project ---_ .... ------- ---.. ---- -------- ------ Number Date By Description of Revisions Sheet Title SECTIONS AND DE=TA""IL=S'---___ _ -------~- Scale Designed Date 2/25/04 Approved By -'-------- Sheet Number Drawn Checked Job Number C3.06 ·~ , , 'it\~' // ~~; '"~ "{'.J , "J . , -;';;. <~ ~, " _. ,'. "':~J"_ S !t'!tY "f.:i·[).h\lW11 St-R.·~C£S fONi;:r'l: rt QWGl)'~o.; 3U'i-D',.(. , , ?~;t;l.~:.::.:::.~'~"':::,.2'·v~":'';~Q~~. _ .. _ .. _ .. _ .. -1 .. _ 20 M ,toI, o 20 40 feet ,." · "-' " "; • I ~ . .:- ;:3. · lj; . " -,' .. _:;''>c~~~-'"--~--''' · ,,' : .. I ---' I ,--~~~:-: ::;-;;.;:::t;:~ 1 . , , I. , I I , I . I / I .1 .. . I ' /. I. . .. I I I I I / I ., , I , . " I I .' . , '. · ./ I"~ ',' .. " §/.("., ...... ./ I" '. • • '. • I ,. ,. . . .,'. I . I I' . , • ...• • / . l ;. :.: .. ' . ' . .' ... I .,.., ... . '.j I.': . .. . .... ' .. r·.·· '. ",' .. -. · -" . . " I' . '. : '. f I'" " • . -/ I.. ," .' .' .' • . " . ." .. " ./ .' I •. " ... ,. . "..,.' ." , I. . " -" ;,;, I :' . I ' •. -. /' -." /' ..... / .. /;.: •. ' .. ' . . . . ~-... . .t ,f. ". 'f' ,. '.' , /: .' .-. ,'. .,' : .. . /,' ..... , :. '.::, . / .. ' ,:, ·f;·'·,· , .... I I . .. / .. './ :: .... " , .. '. , ....... , I·,:~I· '.' .... "r::-: f .. ' f . . ... / ,. .' . •••• _/;. I."" . ' ,.4J>" .1: :: : , f.' .; / 1< : . 1:-' ; . . " . , ... ,' \ ... . ,.' , , ... · .. ~ . " \ .. \' .' I .\ . '. I I , . I . I. I I I I , I ... ' .. I , ,,'1-" · .. ",' ... '-. . . . . . .. .. '. ;; ,:' . . . . ~. .' '. . ... .. ~ '. . .. .. ," .. . '.. . .. 0" • '.: '. "till .. , .. '" . -. ...0-=-.-: ....... ; -,-:. • ' .. ... .' '. of" • . t· • . :, .. :],:.' "':I~: ',' ',..',. ". · " . . . ',' .. " . '. \ ". · -., . ~ · \. " .\ . . . . I .' · . · . ' . . \ ..... \ ,',.:-· : ...... \ ' . . , .,' \ .. ~ . . . ...• .. . .. . . · .. . . . . . -'. . , , . . :" . .,.. . -. -" , ' ... ,. . . .,' . . . ' ..... ,~ i Gi • · .. . . . " .' . : .. :" ... ~ ..... . .. . -. '. . ".' . · ... " . . ' · .... .. . . ..."." . . · · ' . . .... . ' .. - . ' . . . " ./ .. ' ...•..... WETLAND . '. ~ " . .' .' . . .......... "; . , .. ~.:.".' '. :. 1"-. . ~ .. ~ , .. . ' .' . ,s-.... ." " .' • ,., D/TIlH .. . ." . . ... " ,;.'. . , , . .. - -¥' . . .. . : i' '!Ix ... •. ",. '.fl. .• : .. '", ' .' " '. -. -k' ~ .' ".; . .' . . . . ' .. $7JIH . . " fIlM .LJli:J-. I.£: • 42. 74' . -.-..... -..:. -.':---. _ oor". ----- .CB /67 R/N-63.o2' Lo. .. 5£.92' " .. . ' " '. : " . .' . .'. SCALE: i i l r , . , ...... 1" = 60~ --H-+-- ~ .. , . . .., . . I .. , .. ' ... ' .' " . ·1 . . I LIN~ TABLE . '- . '. .. .. N. 1/.2. N.E. 1/.4. SEC. 31. TWPTWP. ~~ S. 1/2. S.E. 1,4. SEC. 30. . N .• N •• RG. 5 RG. 5 I ~GN I / IE GRAPHIC SCALE BUILDING UNE AT SECOND FLOOR BUlLOINGLINE AT THIRD FLOOR SIGN NO PARKING TIRE}ONE ( IN FEET) Inch .., 20 ft. SIGN ~ 'C')N0: !<ETi , El,EV...r1lR E •• E.. W.M. W.M. " / / '/' , ~ , , ' -' / , / -' ,/ / ,/,/ /' / " , ~ / / ." / ~ ~ / / / / / ,/ / / / ,/ / " / / '/ / ./ 10 MINUU: .PARKNG SPAC'E kfl+--S"CONC, RET. WAll q, 12~CONC. WALL AROUND FOUNT POOL OF WA BENCH MARK "B" -j'--- CHISELED SQUARE AT S.W. CORNER CONCRETt WARNING ,," liGHT BASE. +0,,,,,. ELEVATION = 98.15' '// / '/ GRASS 0' " +- CB -~'"'---/j 95.64 O~:i;~~ S) 8i E) \'" CN'" N) '---GRASS-_", ''i/' 0 · ,-' + CB " ~+ 95.6,) IE 93,2 (B"CMP N) on (B"CMP s) 5T AIR ---,,:-, -'WElL I DIRECTORY SIGN CONCRETE "AI.P-" "v~,~ 3' STEEL RAILS I / I / / I I I / I I I / I I I / I I I / I I !Jj.------CS RIM 108.84 \':>i~'--:,. WALK LIGHT IE 105.8 (246 CMP W) ACTIVATOR IE 105,B (12"AOS E) CS (SOLIO LlO) RIM 109.43 IE SOMH RIM 109.63 IE 106.0 (24"C S) IE IOU (8"C S .& NW) R=19.00' f::,. "'90' L=29.85' 141.r-BUS SHEL1ER cs BUS ~GN RIM 110.39 DRAINS TO BUSTED 24"C PIPE DOWN 4.0' ¢ N£A UGIH AC ASPHALTIC coNOR£T[ WV~ EDGE Of ASPHALTIC CONCM:TE e.N. 0 BENCH WARK /' , '--/ . BUll..DlNG UNE @ or []] CATCH BASIN CENTVWNE OF ---RIGHT-Of-WAY CC CONCRETE CURB SOMH (36"0IA, BRICK) RIM 113.56 '" OP co OP CON~TE DRIVE CAST IRON PIPit a..EANOOT CONCf{[lEPlPE IE 107,2 (24"C N) IE 109A (24"C S) ;.' CITY OF RENTON COORDINATE SYSTEM N lH.141.41. E 1.299.099.50 /1'''-'-CS RIM 116.63 IE 112.4(HOLE IN 24 .... C PIPE) ~~"l::::~: O/H 'ELE N., T. DROP E. SIDE C8 (SOliD LID) RIM 118.04 IE 11.3.7 (HOLE IN 246 CONC. PIPE) ,_-S[)MH (36"01A. BRICK) RIM 123.86 IE l1V (24"C N) IE 118,5 (24"C s) TRAfFIC SIGNAL POLE SIGN "NO TRUCKS OVER 26000 LBS, ~~,~_ EXCEPT DELIVERIES '__ WALK LIGHT ACTIVATOR l£~i:'u·;i11~~·1 CONCRETE SURf'"Aa: t.;..<. ~ .. '~ cw CONCMETE WAU< Ox"DEC DECIDUOUS lREE (SIZE NOTED) DIP DUCllLE IRON PIP£: ~ EXlRUO£D CONtRE1E cURe ED or EC El..£C"Tft\CAL outT/CONOUIT Eeb ELECTRICAl.. CAIU (BURIED) o HH aECTJItlCAL HAHOHOLE EM ELECTRICAL NE't£R E\.£cl1!lCAL lRAHSfOfWER EI.£C1"RIcAL VAllL T ElCISl1NG SUR\£Y NON. IN CASE FlNISHto Fl..OQIII: ELEVATION FIRE H'r1)RANT FCC '0 fIRE OEPARlNENT CONNE:CTION FI8ER OPllC • III E- o. ... - GAS I//IJ..'<£ GUY .ANCHOR GUY POLE WARO POST o HCPS • HANOICN> PARkING SPACE .lJHCTIOH BOX LP •• OJ\l ,~, PL (p) PN PS PM 6 f. , .;u. '-"~A UGHT POLE MONlfOft mt. O ...... <AD POWER UNE PlANiER PAlNTlro LOCAllON PARKING !.lET£R PARI<ING SPAt:[ PMKlNG !.lETUt ,"'"".,.. .-at HANDICAP P'ARtQHG POLY 'AHL Y a-ILORlOE PROP!RTY LINE RETAINiNG WAU.. ROCKERY SSS SANITARY SlO£ SOlER SS SAN!T,uh' SEWtR *j;':;:~,,-, , SIGN 6. STRAIN POLE 0---0 smE:E:T UGHT so STClRW DRAIN SDMH STORW DRAIN MANHOlE $t.HH STREET LIGHT !-iNtO HOlE lMH TElEPHONE t.lANHOLE TC or 10 TELEPHONE DUCT /COHDOIT T lEI.£PHOHE UNE lS TV unurv POlE CITY OF RENTON RECEIVED APR 02 2004 • ,,~ .... 0 WAIDa: t.lAIN BUILDING DIVISION 83 M WATER !.lAHHOI.£ WATER !.lEl'ER WA1E1I VAL'f£ I .. 0:::: o LL o W 0:::: « (L w 0:::: (L >- W > 0:::: :::::> (f) u :r: (L « 0:::: o (L o I- .!8 >-0:::: « o z :::::> o m .. X en ::) CD 0::: ~ Z w U -' « u -o w ~ >-W -' -' « > MAJ scole 1"=20' '0, • (J) o 0::: f-o m --' ~ ~ • (J) JJM z ~ Z W Q: 2003141.00 -~--~--~--------c~-_ -~_ ~ N. 1/2, N.E. 1/.4, SEC. 31, TWP. 23 N., RG. 5 E., W.M. S. 1i'2. S.E. 1/4. SEC. 30. TWP. 23 N., RG. 5 E., W.M. GRAPHIC SCALE ( IN FEET ) 1 Inch _ 20 ft. BUILDING UNE AT SECOND FLOOR BUILDING UNE AT TI-lIRD FLOOR VICINITY MAP \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ , \ \ \ \ \ , , r \ \ \ \ --- --- BENCH MARK "en ---- CHISELED SQU ARE AT BACK IE OF CONCRETE WALK. ELEVATION = 78.63' I CB--~ RI~ 81.91 \ \ IE 77 (j"vi i / \ IJ \ , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , \ \ , \ , \ \ \ \~--15' SEVtER UNE EASEMENT REC. NO. 8212090481 \ \ \ \ \ \ /fl / I / / / / / / I / / / / / I I } I / / / @ / / _____ 10' ELECTRICAL EASEMENT / I REC. NOI. 8104160537 / / / \ IDIRE/ClORY \\ I SIGN \ '" icB , " RIM 13.57 ,,,"'0" , I"".... IE 70.2 (6"PVI NE) I I ".... ~ ~ _________ ~E 70.1 (TC /d'H,",'-' '\ .... , I 'I --./.-/- " .... , ~ \ \ 1"---65"1;·(""'·G....'IQi-~b~~t~~;m~---"i---_ " \ I ---------, ' ----~.,--t ~Licc~ l .. _c~: ;::; rn I ,-S8 1i""£-13-1-: CB (TYPE 2) RIM 72.14 IE 67.0 (10"PVC N) IE 67.1 (5"PVC E 8< S) IE 57.1 (8"PVC S) I ~ - \ -- t:1= 1 \ 1 SIGN NO PARKING I'IRE;'DNE BENCH MARK TOP OF 3" DOMED BRASS DISC. nCAR4-1999 KING COUNTY SURVEY MONUMENT~ =l> ~----\-- / " " / / ,_.' ". £'LEVATOR . . . " _-r-C8 RIM 88.93 IE 85.,-@·C E) ,/' + GRASS .. ~N~~~~~E~1.29'!.6~6.9E ----""7.~-- +' I r--- -+-1- l' +~ro-7 ~ ..,~ BENCH ~ARK CHISELED SQUARE AT CORNER CONCRETE WAR~ UGHT B, ELEVATION = 9E ~.- SITE NOTES TAX ACCOUNT NO.: 885767-0010-05 (LOT 1) 885767-0020-03 (LOT 2) 885767-0030-01 (LOT 3) 885767-0040-09 (LOT 4) 885767-0050-06 (LOT 5) 885767-0060-04 (LOT 6) 885767-0070-02 (LOT 7. TAXABLE PORllON) 885767-0070-93 (LOT 7. EXEMPT PORllON) 885767-0080-00 (LOT 8) 885767-0090-06 (LOT 9. TAXABLE PORllON) 885767-0090-99 (LOT 9. EXEIIPT PORllON) 885767-0100-06 (LOT 10) ZONING: CO(p) -COIoI~ERCIAL OFFICE \\Il>< PUBUC O\\1<£RSHIP NOllCE REQUIREO ZONING AGENCY: CnY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT SERIACES 1055 SOUTH GRADY WAY RENTON. WA 98055 (425) 4Jo-72oo SETBACKS: CURRENT SETBACK REOlJIR~EN1S SUBJECT TO SITE PLAN REIAEW. CURRENT SETBACKS MAY DIFFER FROM THOSE IN EFfECT DURING DESIGN/CONSTRUCllON OF EXlSllNG I~PROVEMEN1S. FLOOD ZONE: THIS SITE APPEARS ON NATIONAl FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP I DA lED MAY 16, 1995. COMMUNITY PANEL NO. 53033C0979F, AND IS SITUATED IN ZONE 'X". AREA DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE 500 YEAR FLOOOPLAIN. HORIZONTAL CATIJM: NAD 1983/91 -AS PROIADED BY CITY OF RENTON SURVEY CONTROL NETWORK. REFERENCE CONTROL POINTS ARE AS FOLLOWS: 1227 LOCAllON: FOUND A 3/8" BRASS PWG IN 10" ~ONUMENT CASE AT A PC ON TALBOT ROAD SOUl>< IN l><E INTERSECllON OF TALBOT ROAD SOUl>< AND SOUl>< 45l>< PLACE. 1><ERE IS A SIMILAR MONUMENT SOUl>< 24' EAST 11.4 FEET. ~MENT: 3/8 IN BRASS pwe IN MONU~ENT CASE NORl><ING: 163.155.0641 EASlING: 1.298.978.216 ELEVAllON: 1229 LOCA TlON; FOUND 10· MONUMENT CASE AT THE INTERSEcnON OF SOUTHWEST 43RO SlREET AND TALBOT ROAO SOUTH APPROxtMA TEl Y 10' NORTI-I OF ANOTHER MONUMENT CASE AT l><E PC OF A CURVE ON TALBOT ROAD SOUl><. MONUMENT; MONUMENT CASE NORTHING: 163,956.1484 EASTlNG: 1.299.050.266 El£VATION: VERTICAL DATUM: HAVO 1988 -AS PROVIDED BY CITY OF RENTON SURVEY CONTROl.. NETWORK. REFERENCE CONTROL POINT USED: 1892 LOCATION: DOT BRASS DISK SURVEY MARK SET IN A 10· DIAMETER CONCRETE t.lONUMENT LOCA TEO AT THE ORlWA INTERCHANGE EAST OF l><E SOUl><WEST 43RO STREET SR 167 UNDERCROSSING. ABOUT HALFWAY TO lHE INTERSECllON Wll>< A TRAFFIC UGHT CONTROWNG FREEWAY OFF AND ON R~P TRAFFIC. MONUhlENT: WSDOT BRASS DISC IN CONCRETE LOCATED SEL Y OF SOUTHWEST 4JRO STREET OVERPASS OF SR 167 NORTHING: 163,921.58 EASTING: 1.298,126.31 ELEVATION: 84.97 (SEE ORA\\ING FOR BENCHMARKS SET FOR SITE USE). SU8STRUCTURES: BUR1ED UTiUllES ARE SHOWN AS INDICA TED ON RECORDS MAPS FURNISHED BY Ol><ERS AND VERIFIED "'ERE POSSIBLE BY FEATURES LOCATED IN THE FlELD. WE ASSUME NO UABIUTY FOR l><E ACCURACY OF lHOSE RECORDS. FOR lHE FINAL LOCATION Of EXISTING UnuTIES IN AREAS CRITICAL TO DESIGN CONTACT lHE UllUTY OIl1<£R/AGENCY. TELECOMIoIUNICA llONS/FIBER OPllC DlSCLA~ER: RECORDS OF UNDEROROUND TELECOIoIMUNICAllONS AND/OR FlBER OPllC UNES ARE NOT AlWAYS AVAILABLE TO THE PUBUC. ALlHOUGH BRH HAS CONTACTED AND RESEARCHED THE LOCAL JURISDlCllON RECORDS. SRH HAS NOT CONTACTED EACH OF THE MANY COMPANfES, IN "THE COURSE OF THIS SURVEY ..... CH COULD HAVE UNDERGROUND UNES \\Il><1N ADJACENT RlGHTS- OF-WAY. l><EREFORE, BAH DOES NOT ACCEPT RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE EXISTENCE OF UNDERGROUND TELECOMIoIUNICATIONS/F!BER OPllC UNES 'M-I1CH ARE NOT WADE PUBUC RECORD Mnt 1lfE LOCAL .AJRlSOICnON. AS ALWAYS. CALL 1-800-424-5555 BEFORE CONSTRUCllON. UllUTY PROIADERS: SANITARY SEVlERS, STORM DRAINAGE, WAlER aTY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1055 SOUTH GRADY WAY RENTON. WA 98055 (425) 4Jo-7200 PO¥t£R AND NATURAL GAS PUGET SOUND ENERGY 411 loaTH AVENUE NE PO BOX 97034 BELLEVUE. WA 98009 (425) 454-6363 FAX: (425) 462-3300 TELEPHONE OWEST LDA GROUP PO BOX 625001 UTTLETON. CO 80162 (BOO) 528-3557 DESCRIPllON: LOTS 1 lHROUGH 10 OF VALLEY MEOICAL CENTER NORl>< CAMPUS BINDING SITE PLAN. RECORDED IN VOLU~ 188 AT PAGES 89 l><ROUGH 93. INCLUSIVE. IN KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON • llTLE REPORT REFERENCE: l><IS SURVEY WAS CONDUCTED ACCORDING TO THE DESCRIPllON SHOWN. FURNISHED BY ARST AMERICAN TIn..E INSURANC£ COMPANY, CaM,mNENT NO. 865586-C2, DAlEO NOVEMBER 26. 2001. THE EASEMENTS SHOWN OR NOTED HEREON RELATE TO lHIS COIoIIoII~T. NOTE: EASEMENTS CREATED oR RESCINDED AFlER THIS DATE ARE NOT SHOWN OR NOTED HEREON. TIn..r REPORT SCHEDULE B EXCEPTIONS: ITEMS CIRCLED ARE SHO'IIN ON MAP. 32. E~ENT. INCLUDtNG TERMS AND PROIASIONS CONTAlNED l><ERJN: RECOROEO: RECORDING NO.: IN FAVOR OF: FOR: AFFECTS: JANUARY 28, 1970 6611144 PUCET SOUND POWER AND UGHT ~PANY. A WASHINGTON CORPORA liON ELECTRIC TRANSIoIISSION AND/OR DlSlRlBUTION SYSTDI EAST UNE OF SAID SUBDIIASiON 33. EASE~NT. INCLUDING TER~S AND PROIASiONS CONTAlNEO THEREIN: RECOROEO: RECORDING NO.: IN FAVOR OF: FOR: AFFECTS: JANUARY 28. 1970 661145 PUCET SOUND POWER AND UGHT COMPANY. A WASHINGTON CORPORAllON ELECTRIC TRANSIoIISSION AND/OR DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM EAST UNE OF SAlD SUBDMSlON 34. EASEMENT, INCLUOING TERNS ANO PROViSIONS CONTAINED THEREIN: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: IN FAVOR OF: FOR: AFFECTS: JANUARY 12. 1976 7601120549 PUGET SOUND POWER AND UGHT COMPANY, A WASHINGTON CORPORA liON ELECTRIC TRANSIoIISSiON AND/OR DISTRIBUllON SYSTEM EAST UNE OF SAID SUBOt'I/ISION 35. NOTICE OF WATER UNE UCENSE AGREEMENT AND THE l'ERMS AND CONDIllONS THEREOF: BETWEEN: AND: RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: PUBUC HOSPITAL DISTRICT NO. 1 Of KING COUNTY CITY OF RENTON AUGUST 20. 1979 7908200611 36. EASE~ENT. INCLUDING TERMS AND PROIASiONS CONTAINEO l><ERElN: RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: IN FAVOR OF: FOR: AFFECTS: JULY 31, 1979 7907'11138 PUGET SOUND POWER ANO UGHT CQUPANY, A WASHINGTON CORPORA liON ELECTRIC TRANSIoIISSiON AND/OR DISTRIBUllON SYSTEM REFER TO SAID INSTRUIoiENT FOR l><E EXACT LOCA liON 37. EASEMENT, INCLUDING TERMS AND PROVISIONS CONTAINED lHEREIN: RECORDED: RECORC»NG NO.: IN FAVOR OF; FOR: AFFECTS: AUGUST 13, 1979 7908130547 CITY OF RENTON DRAlNACE WEST UNE Of SAID SUBDt'v1SION ® EASE~ENT. INOWDING TERMS AND PROIASiONS CONTAINED l><ERElN: RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: IN rAVOR OF: FOR: AFFECTS: APRIL 13, 1981 8104'30478 CITY OF RENTON WATER PIPEUNES SOUl>< UNE OF SAlD SUBDIIASiON ® EASEMENT. INCLUOING TERUS AND PROVISIONS CONTAINED THEREIN: RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: IN FAVOR OF: FOR: AFFECTS: APRIL 16, 1981 8104160537 PUGET SOUND PO\\1ER ANO UGHT COMPANY, A WASHtNGTON CORPORAllON ELECTRIC TRANSIoIISSION AND/OR DtSTRIBullON SYSTEM SOUl>< UNE OF SAlD SUBDIIASiON 40. EA~ENT. INCLUDtNG TERMS AND PROIASiONS CONTAlNED l><EREIN: RECORDED: RECORotNG NO.: IN FAVOR OF: FOR: AFFEC1S: OCTOBER 27. 1981 8110270511 CITY OF RENTON SEWER.UNE WESTERLY PORllON OF SAlD SUBDIVISION 41. NOllCE OF SEWER UNE AGRE~ENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDIllONS l><EREOF: BETWEEN: AND: RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: SAN LWAI. CAVElLA LWAI AND BWE MT. DEVElOPMENT L TO. EUGENE BRAIN AND UWAN BRAlN NOVEIoIBER 3. 1981 8111030304 @ EASE~NT. INCLUDING TERMS AND PROIASiONS CONTAlNED l><EREIN, RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: IN FAVOR OF: FOR: AFFECTS: NOVElolBER 16. 1981 8111160317 PAClFlC NORl><WEST BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY UNDERGROUNO COMMUNICA liON UNES SOUl><EAST PORllON 43. EASEMENT, INClUC»NG TERMS AND PROVISIONS CONTAINED THEREIN: RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: IN FAVOR OF: FOR: AFFECTS: DECEMBER ", 1981 8112110352 PUGET SOUND POWER AND UGHT CONPANY, A WASHINGTON ~ORPORA llON ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION AND/OR DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM EASlERL Y PORTION NOllCE OF SEII£R UHE AGREEMENT AND lHE TERMS AND CONDIllONS lHEREOF: BETWEEN: AND: RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: VAU£Y GENERAL HOSPITAL CITY OF ~NTON DECEMBER 9, 1982 8212090481 45. EASEMENT, INCLUDfNG TERMS AND PRO'V1SlONS CONTAINEO THEREIN: RECORDED: RECORDtHG NO.: IN FAVOR OF: FOR: AFFECTS: AUGUST 13. 198~ 8408130445 PUGET SOUND POWER AND UGHT COMPANY, A WASHINGTON CORPORA liON ELECTRIC TRANSlAISSION AND/OR DISTRIBUllON SYSTEM EASTERLY PORllON 46. EASEMENT, INCLUrnNG TERMS AND PROVISIONS CONTAINED THEREIN: RECORDED: RECOROtNG NO.: IN FAVOR Of: FOR: AFFECTS: SEPTEMBER II. 1987 870908OJ5' SAN LWAI AND BlUE MOUNTAIN UMITED PARTNERSHIP 24 FOOT \\IDE ACCESS ROAD EASTERLy PORTION SAlD EASEMENT PARllALLY TERMINATED BY INSTRUIoIENT RECORDED JUNE 2. 1989 UNDER RECORDING NO. 8906020695. @ EASEMENT. INCLUDING TERMS AND PROIASIONS CONTAINED l><EREIN: RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: IN FAVOR OF: FOR: AFFECTS: APRIL 4. 1988 6604040492 PUGET SOUND POYt£R AND UGHT COMPANY, A WASHINGTON CORPORAllON ELECTRIC TRANSIAISSION AND/OR DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM EASTERLY PORllON 48. EASEMENT. INa.UDlNG lERMS AND PROVlS1ONS CONTAINED THEREIN: RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: FOR: AFFECTS: MAY 19. 1989 8905191454 ACCESS. PARKING AND UllUTY SERIACES l><E LEGAL DESCRIPTION CONTAINED IN SAID EASEN£NT IS NOT SUffICIENT TO DETERMINE ITS EXACT LOCATION WITHIN SAID PREMISES 49. COVENANTS. CONDIllONS. RESTRlCllONS AND/OR EASEMENTS; BUT DELETING ANY COVENANT. CONDIllON OR RESTRICllON INOICA liNG A PREFERENCE. UMITAllON OR DtSCRIMINAllON BASED ON RACE. COLOR. REUGION. SEX. HANDICAP. FAMILY STATUS. OR NAllONAL ORIGIN TO l><E EXTENT SUCH COVENANT. CONDITIONS OR RESTRlCllONS IAOLATE 42 USC 3604(C): RECORDED: RECORDING NO(S): ~AY 19. 1989 8905191-455 50. EASEMENT, INCLUDING TERMS AND PRO\1SlONS CONTAINED THEREIN: RECOROEO: RECORDING NO.: FOR: AFFECTS: DECEMBER 211. 1989 8912281554 ACCESS AND PARKING NORl><ERL Y PORllON 51. EASEMENT, INQUDING TERMS AND PROVISIONS CONTAINED THEREIN: RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: FOR: AFFECTS: NAY 14, 1992 9205140426 UnUTY SER'VJCES, PARKING AND ACCESS THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION CONTAlNEO IN SAID E~ENT IS NOT SUFFICIENT TO OETERtMNE ITS EXACT lOCA TlON Yf1TH1N SAID PREt.llSES MODIFlCAllON AND/OR AMEND~NT BY INSTRUMENT(S): RECOROEO: SEPTEIoiBER 22. 1999 RECORDiNG NO(S).: 19990922001766 52. RESTRICllONS. CONDtllONS. DEOICAllONS. NOTES. E~ENTS AND PRQVlstONS CONTAINED AND/OR DEUNEAlED ON lHE FACE OF 'THE SHORT PLAT R[CORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 1812149018. 53. RESTRICTIONS. .CONOIllONS. OEOICAllONS. NOTES, E~ENTS ANO PROIASIONS. IF ANY. CONTAINEO AND/OR DEUNEATED ON THE FACE OF l><E SHORT PLAT RECORDED IN VOl.lJME , •• OF PLATS AT PAGE(S) 89 TI-lROUGH 93. INCLUSIVE, IN KING COUNTY, WASHlNGTON. 54. NOllCE OF UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK ABANDONMENT: RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: MARCH 23. 1990 900323040J 55. TE~S AND CONOITIONS OF STREET USE PERMIT: RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: AFFEC1S: JANUARY 15, 1993 9301150938 PORllON ADJOINING SOUlH 4JRD STREET ® EASEMENT, INCLUDING TERMS AND PROVlStONS CONTAINEO THEREIN: RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: IN FAVOR OF: FOR: AFFECTS: FEBRUARY 23, 1993 9302232323 CITY OF RENTON UllUllES. ROADWAY SLCIPES AND SIOEWAlI< AREAS PORllON ADJOINING SOUlHWEST 43RO STREET AND TALBOT ROAD @ EASEMENT, INCLUDING TERMS AND PR0'V1Sl0NS CONTAINEO THEREIN: RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: IN FAVOR OF: FOR: AFFECTS: JULY 12. 1993 9307121299 aTY OF RENTON UllUllES ANO ROADWAY SLOPES PORllON ADJOINING SOUlHWEST 43RD STREET AND TALBOT ROAD . . a::: o LL o W a::: « Q.. W a::: Q.. >-W > a::: ~ o I Q.. « a::: o Q.. o f- ~ >-a::: « o z ::::J o en • o z -.. ~ Z - tIcS(/) 0:: .. :J: (/) :::> at W W Z C> Z W a::: ~ Z W () ...J « () -o w ~ >-W ...J ...J « > drawn by • · l- (/) o n::: n .q- · (/) ~ Z ::) o u o z ~ z ~ Z w a:: _ checked by MAJ JJM scole 1"=20' job f'I(I. 2003141.00 ~ ;": UJ " , , VICINITY MAP ----- GRAPHIC SCAl£ ( IN FITT ) 1 Inch -= 20 . ft., I I _ •• .1.0 I I N. 1/,2. N.E. 1/,4. SEC. 31. TWP. 23 S. 1/,2. S.E. 1/4. SEC. 30. TWP. 23 N .• N .• BUILDING UNE ¢. AREA UGH AC ASPHAll1C ~ETE EDGE Of ASPHAlTIC CONCRElE B.M. ~ BEHCI-I MARK // ./ / // BUtLDlNG UNE @ or rrn CATCH BASIN co co OP co CP CENTERUNE aF RIGHT-OF-WAY CONCRElE OURS COOCRflE [)fill"';: CAST IRON PIPE ClEANOUT CONCRETE PIPE U~~?:"':~"";;i"~"'i~"\l CONCRETE SURfACE: CW CONCRETE WALK OX"DEC DECIDUOUS mEE (SIZE NOTED) DIP DUCTILE IRON PIPE ECC EXlRUO£D CONCRETi CURB EO or EC ELEClRlCAI. DUCT/CONDUIT Eeb ELECTRICAl CABLE (BURIED) o HH ELECTRICAL HAtIDHOlE EM ElECTRICAL NETEM Ei ELECl1!:ICAL lRANSfOlWER roc FO G III <- GP o HCPS • ElECTRICAl. VAULT EXlS1100 SUR\of:Y UON. IN CASE FINISHED flOOR ElEVATION FIRE H'l'DRANT FIRE DEPARlN£NT CONNECTION FIBER OPTIC GAS MAIN GAS VAL'.£ GUYAN<>1OR GUY POLE GUARO POST HANDICAP PARKING SPACE JUNCTION BOX LP UGH POLE "W 0,>< P~E PL (P) "'" PS .... P\'C R WAU. "~'i' sss ss (R) ..... SCMH SLHH TMH TC~Tll T 15 TV w _0 EEl H MONITOR v.nL O","EAO POWER U~ PLAN,.. PAINTED LOCAllON PARKING MEiER PARKING SPACE PAfOONG t.lETER PEOES'mlAN RAMP oR HANDICAP PARKING POLY '¥\NL Y OilCfllDE """""'lY UN< RETAINING WALL ROCKERY SAAITARY SIDE SEYI£R SANITARY SEYlER ~CORf) DATA SANITARY MANHOlE .ON STRAIN POlE SlREET UGHT STORM DRAIN Sl'ClRN ORAIN I.4N#1OLE STREET LIGHT HAND HOLE lElEPHONE DUCT/CONOUlT TELEPHONE UNE TEL.fPHOHE SENlRY ~SlOH CABLE 'TRAFFIC FlOW UllUTY POLE WATER MAIN WA lER MANHOLE WATER Io1ElER WATER VALVE AT SECOND FlOOR / .-' / ,/ .. . .. .. .. ' / /' ",/> ./ / / .. RG. 5 RG. 5 ,/ E .• E .• " , W.M. W.M. / . , . / • .. / -' / /' ,- /. / / -' / ,,//' // . .. . .. . . .. . .. .. , ./ / / .. / .' '// /,. , . / / , ,/ // , -_/ , ./ /' " / / ,/ / / / / / / ' ./ / / / ./ , ,/ ,-' f ,.. GREASE TRAP __ ';~~~l RIM 80.9 TOP RISER 76,55 (N.) TOP RISER 76.6 (S.) IE 75.1 (8"P N) IE 75.1 (8"P S) / / .' -' / / " . .' " ,/ . , .' ,/ ... --- ~-"Tr-¥--;:--SSMH / , 80.12 IE 78.6 (4"P N) IE 77.3 (6"C W) IE 77.3 (4"P S) RIM 80.08 IE 73.7 (8"IP NE) IE 73,4 (8"P VI) IE 73.6 (6"P SW) IE 73.6 (8"P S)(2 PIPES) I / I I / / / / I / / / / / / I I / / I / / / / / / I / / / I / / / I I I I I I I I I I / I I I I I I I I 1/ I I~ I I I ~~ I I --....... i~~~/~~~~ 1)\C~~ ~/ Gtyy'b ~ , i 1A~ ~ut~ I I l' ~~~~ -uS l3\ / I / C~\A~ / / ~O?-.ry\\ / II / I I I I I I I CB -~"'---/1 95.64 S) E) N) ~--GRASS-~ (j~ • f?':-'-,; +. CB <lI+ 95.63 IE 93,2 (8"CMP N) IE 92.8 (B"C"P S) STAIR-,,-, -WELL I I / I / I DIRECTORY SIGN • IX o LL o W IX « 0... W IX 0... >-W > IX :::::> (/) () I 0... « IX o 0... o f-- ~ >-IX « o z :::::> o m .. X en :::> CD ..,J > () a::: w I- Z W () ....J « () -o w ~ )- W ....J ....J « > MAJ 1"=20' job no, (f) o 0::: I-o m --1 « I- o 0:: n -.;;t- • (f) ~ z ::::> o o (!) Z YO . Z ~ Z w a:: Checked by JJM 2003141.00 ~ I .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. ~ ........ ~~ .• h.".t .... 3 .... 01 ... 3 .... .. :s \ \ ~) Q(J \J ?' ,p'" \ \ 43 HWY 167 '" XISTI 'I ARKIN EXISTING PARKING NEW PAR ING I I I ~~~~~~~[ L-L_/\ ____ ~J D D2?g r--::::J C] 0 0[1 0 '" '" ..--• + ENG. = 0 , , I ~,\;----I TALBOT RD S (SPRINGBROOK RD S) d- I c--~-- 1-- 11- nbbj 111 Sou th Jackson Street Sea t tie, Washington 98104 (206) 223-5555 Fax (206) 621-2300 Site Plan Review Documents ~ REGISTERED \ 7 ARCHITECT \ JAMES R. HOBBS I ~TATE OF WASHINGTON] ~-- EXPUUS 1a-20-04 Valley Medical Center 400 South 43rd St Renton, Washington Valley Medical Center Expansion Project -._-_._-._----------- ------- --------------. ----- -------._--- ---_._-- -------- --------- _.---------- ------_.----- Number Date By Description of Revisions Sheet Title SITE PLAN ---------.---- ------ ---------_._._---- Scale 1" ~ 500' Designed Drawn Date 02/25/04 Checked Approved By JRH Job Number 24882.46 _ .. _. ----_.- Sheet Number (CO) I I (CO) - -----------------~- I I I I 1/ i I I I I (R-8) (CO) PROJECT AREA S 43RD ST I~- / -~- (CO) (CO) (CO) e:, ~<v. ~ ~ (CO) (CO) ~y~----+ ~ en (CO) ( (RM-I) (RM-I) (CO) (CO) (CO) 45TH PL (CO) ---I (CO) --~---------------j (RM-I) 0 n::: I- 0 CD ....J ~ r---- I (CO) (CO) (CO) (CO) (CO) (R-14) I I (R-8) L ___ ;:;--;---______ _ S 38TH ST (R-8) c.D ~ :t: r / /f ~ fT\ VA\ \_--------"""- (RM-I) (CO) (CO) (R-1) (CO) ,...... ~ I a:: ......., ...... .... (CO) I (R-1) a:: ....." ......... .... I a:: ....., ".... r- I (R-1) (RMH) a:: ....... --- o 100 200 400 ~! _~I ~I~_~I SCALE: '1"= 200' RESIDENTIAL ~R-1) RESIDENTIAL 1 du/ ac R-8) RESIDENTIAL 8 du/ac RM-I) RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY INFILL COMMERCIAL (CO) COMMERCIAL OFFICE CITY LIMITS - nbbj 111 ')outh Jackson Street Sea I tie, Washington 98104 (20b) 223-5555 Fax (206) 621-2300 Site Plan Review Documents ~62§ \-REGISTERED I \ "; \ ARCHITECT I \ .. _.JAMES R. HOBBS ~'AI'E o.F WASHINGTON L----- EXPIRES lO·lO--{l4 Valley Medical Center 400 South 43rd St Renton, Washington Valley Medical Center Expansion Project ------- -------------- -------------- Number Date By Description of Revisions --"--'--------- Sheet Title :"":N E=--IG .... H=-=-BOl-=cR=J:l=O--::-O=--D =DE=T:-;-A;-O-IL -;-;Ml\'!!A~P~_ -_- 1" 200' Scale i ~ -':':":' ________ _ Designed AJ Drawn Date 02/25/04 Checked Approved By JRH Job Number 24882.46 Sheet Number AD.DO \ HWY 167 XISTI G. ARKIN .--' , .. _) ( \ \ \ 43 \ EXISTING PARKING NEW PARKI -. -' :',~"~//'\\{:'~\'-' G '\ .~ '1J_ ... _ o n ~ o , o o D~--9 r C] I D [\ II -I) o --.J /> /\ // / ~ J c. _~ o ENG. = o I TALBOT RD S (SPRINGBRO K RD S) i . , I c--"----- . I 1--1 ~ I j -l ..... - u , .. ,;; .. ;',' \ ;,-._, . ---- .. nbbj 111 'jouth ,Jackson Street Sea l tie, Washington 98104 (206) 223-5555 Fax (206) 621-2300 ._-_ .... - Site Plan Review Documents ,,-"" \ REGISTEREDl \) \ ARCHITECT \ JAMES R. HOBBS 1 ~A'fEOIiWASII~~I'ON L----------. F.XPTRES 10.20.1U Valley Medical Center 400 South 43rd St Renton, Washington Valley Medical Center Expansion Project ---~ -_.----_._--- ---_ .. _---- ---._ .. _ .. ------ ._-------- ---~ -.-----_._-- ---~ _ .. -... _-- --_._-- ----------- Number Dole By Description of Revisions Sheet Title LANDSCAPING PLA1L __ --.. ---------- -.--~ Scale r ~ 500' -- Designed Drawn -.- Dole 02/25/04 Checked ------=-c=-:-:-::- Approved By JIIH Job Number 24882.46 _. Sheet Number