Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
LUA-04-133
, .. .:v: ] o v " " .x ~ ~ ;;; ~ ~ ;; ~ ! crTY OF RENTON LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT A·POROONOF THE HENRY H. TOBIN DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 37 crTY OF RENTON LAND USE ~J.~T'CI( .. S'i IN THE BE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 SEC. 18, lWP. 23N., ANG. OSE., W.M. ACTION NUMBER 04-Q18-LLA CASE (""lED 7/3/00) ~ CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON ~ NOI·'!!!.I' ---------,//'_~ I~---------------------------j--Y~.--~ !{:~1 7 18--------' ---f 1 ""'" '-:--:-::::8 I 35.15 18 ~C:O~~AD~&,1N.-j\\ { v,,, ,,-, I ~ 00.1 (\'tSITED 7/3/f1O) t-BASIS TO\'/NI OF RENTON I' ~ to-: -~ARINCs PACE RECORD OF SI.IR~ BLOCK 24 ~ , ''':C)' .;, -:--:-[8 ~ Q) 'OO~I'<2, 2i:i. 85' !B£, .,,:~ lJO~~ "''''-!!.O '9990707900018 , : ~ " VI'" L ,. ~ 26J684J - -I I 10 ~ ~ ~~IN _I ~ rl CA!£ 0.7' DOIIt i< ;1 ~ :!~ LOTI, : g i~' ~ ~::$:""" ------~----------------",_NOI"30'4jJ-E: -----!!!:!!. .. --------------~:_-_Y\_--=-----=---~ (~ __ 3,5' CHAIN LINK FENCE SJ SUFiNETT II A VENUE SOI.J17..I '0 I • 751 50 J GG'(PACE_:J.9J') ON TOf' OF " WIDE I g CONC. RET WALL 1 JI~4-4' __ I 'IU~' "SAN S[lIp £AS£JilENT n~' -~ ~7H R£CCROING 1fU()IJ(JI0641 ~ I PfJNQI IiARK a'' ~ ~g I .~. ".<,' I =.:~) I '..h~' . (')t-(''\'" 1 ~ h~' , IU'~: ·~I ~,~~~~ '<" ~ : "ti ~~ 1':,'$;;~<-.~ ~,~: 0 I ~ ~:~ n .p'<, : t,~ ~ ,2 ? ' ~ I til ~J : ii~ 1;"' -' e: ql ~ I : ~c 'lOS 3.:f • e' CHAIN LINK FENCE : VI : ;5 -----------1 2' 94.27' _ I I i"--NOI"JO'4S"F ~1(Uo' ~ I· NOTE; ACCOImINC TO THE:CHICAOO ll1LE INS. CO. ALTA COWtta'NENT II! "AIEl> """A/IY J. 2000 • .-., ~ EXctPnOHS" THERE NI£ ~ ,~ ~::: ~~~~" RECCAIlED UNIlER .. .-/ SFARO<ED "" I. I ~/'--~_ ~ ~ FOUND __ T IN CASE ff/t" . 01/ 1'::;'-""7 :: r __ ASSOlSf(WfHPUNCHII_fN~ ~ (NO ~ \,. -!-----'-----------'-------V.-A'-----_________ ca<af£1£ "we 7-.1-00 NO" 'os, j'; I . :;A 42188' = ~ : LOOAiJ AVENUE SOUTH 9'29''''" _ 'SCHIIE/OCR" (HELD) ~''!"!----b· ~ , t-NO:;;:;."E-~V~-W'_~-I-.-II'-ASS-Q/SI(--"»I./r ~~"E------Y...-A---------~-,70-2" n~ ~ L_ IIOIIIJIIENTfN CASE ~w.};t;,,1N -" " ;, ~,:::,;::: or ," (\fSf/ED 7/J/OO) ~ ": _ n,T"": ~l ~~~~I€ r-r-30' I 30'/ ':2. 1 ) 111",rl-"88. ~(i) Kc.''l,V'l I So a AIIPORT .. r , "':)' ;, -:-~ i:..., 1--:1 ,TT'-" ',~O~Of, ,.11 ,... ,-, , " ~ ~~ tIJ.~'--TAL V", ,. . Ctl 'J~:f'L.,-,' ,c.u , : : : : --~ ~ ~7O' (PACE 3.6" , ~ C'Ij I _ BRASS PIN IN COlIC. Ii; LEGEND + FOUND SECTION CORNER AS DESCRIBED CALCULAT[D SECTION QUARTER OOftNER -~ REFERENCE SURVEYS ItIONUItI£NT IN CAS£ '.f 00I#I -• !::! AlSO orr OF RCHTON IJ£IICHIIARK ~r i<; ,." £l.£VAlION-,2-11'" NAil> ~ I'" i'fSI7FD 7/1ll"...,) o FOUND "ONUMENT AS DESCRIBED SET 1/2-REBAR &: CAP L.S. '22g~6 ---+-!!-FENCE AS DESCRIBED ·PACE" BOOK 130 PAGE 220 RECORDING 119990.?O79~18 "SCHNEIDER" BOOK 1 06 PAGE 81 RECORDI,NG f951 1 ~79~2 ~e!@ j SCALE fa.40' ®&~[§Ib[]~[§ENGINEERIt-lG, INC. kJ·~'p~'y_ CITY OF RENTON LAND RECOFIO NUMBER LND-30:-027B EOUIPMENT NOTE . TOPCON GTS 3030 TOTAL STATION OWNI PRlStot -JOWW OFFSET TDS 48 OATA COLUCTOR BASIS OF BEARING SURVEY BY -PACE" IN BOOK 130 Of SURVEYS, PAGE 220, UNDER KING COUNlY RECORDING NUIABr.R 19990707900018. (2~~ ..... 1.SeGttI.·(200)824-'~.F~ (253)~ land·fIttmnf."9.1: UN • E~ • Surteyfne JOB-NO: 04-01. SHEET 2 Of·2 --:b-~-u u u¢"_ u u -(it' I' ~ W ... "_"""",, J __ ~ f 'E-~: ',: ~l .,~ , .~~ '_"_OUTH ___ ..""""",_, __ ~ _ 0 ____ ~! • • -'" ~ ---~1<f:'jI~u ---L~~1E1l1'lll! ----I I - ---®"" -_ 1i~~~~~~~~!t~Z:~~~~~i • ----(OJ) X '·'''·''''''''''l I ____ • .. •... , &'t,ANlI(loERt-' !llf:CC'V!I\I6' __ 1 ~lt i ~H: ! ! ~·~~·"'",,)Il'·.I~~-";Z:::","","-,--, __ ,_L!Bt=~, __ ,~-~~-,- (0) .., o (OJ) SI ;1 1 1 .~ 1 PROPOSED BUILDING ~~:: , .. ·r····, -'--'-;"·;';;i--'--'--'--'--'--' BURNEll PLACE SOUTH ®SITEPLAN 1 i JI1t/' I ~LI--I!. =-~ !!'J: \ :i ---...! ~_. __ . __ . __ . __ : __ .~_ .... E~ ~~~=- -, 1811-1'1-IE--~~ Parkslde at 95 Burnett _ TSA'.rtJJit,rtl. Iou.. "'11··" ..... 11.11.._301 --.WAtml< TQS.ooI.lolWlPQS.«JI./lllO ! .,",... ~ ~II ~;I 1Jo0/9~/0l 1V1lI~8ns M31A31:f NVld 3l.IS i --(]) c "-::J al l.Oi 0) Z +-' « co -I (]) a.. "C ,... "Ci) .::t:. "-co a.. ~ Il J II ~ II) () 0D .+ .... .' :: .. 11 F r==- n~-~~·: I I! .j 1 1,0.:..10':" \~; c:; i,~) (0 /.~ I~: U i Hi, , . I~~'J':~-!:~'~~ ,-jj'~L'_L ll-'-J-Ll~~J,+~L' ..• C'LJ~ ___ l~L-' L+_J_L_/ / I I "I 02 TOTAL STAWI (SO STANDARD, • COMPACll , i ";/ /:: I . . 88 STALLS ACCESSIBLE FROM DRIVE AISLE i ,. • ' ;1 ! ~ ------------------------...!.----------------------------------~-------:-------------------:------~-----------';;-T---~-------+-----.:--------,./' ·i I' : i/ " ,,1 iii I I ,// :: ,0 '(~! r".~ \.~) li ~='~·--~~~-~-·--:-=l~~Tl-:~C·~I~~--:·-r=T~~--~.[-;--.T~T·-r·::T~r:--I-~--To~r:--I~--~=r:--;~;J~r~-r--rr~r:--rt--l--~r~--,--~--i ~~-~ I ~ : :1 ii--m, I "nL I I 'i ,-----, ,---+-,: i I,m+jml---~ 0 il' ,n+---1! I '-T--': ,nl--r;Tml [,-,----, , I i--m,:t------, I ,m!_~j L~~~~~~=~:i~~~~~~~n~~~~~~~*~~~~~~~nn==~-~~~~~~-~}~~~~=~~~-~~~t~}2 /~:J ( ~" (;>, :"~j :~;) (~) GARAGE LEVEL 2 PLAN :;'C.A~;:::: Z:'~:;: ",i i g iii iii ~ L-:=---"I'" I' 1--' II __ ~= Parkside at 95 Burnett _~ II "''-~s:.;;.:: II ~21! D'':;'~~tMT ...... .I. e ~T~_ =.s.~~~ o 1~='::.TGf4' [==J~~~=-~~~~ 8A"fTeIt't' ~ ". Otoel..L"'I,H~(Ote 5A~ A -''''L_. ~ .. _ ... , ~I.NITj. C::>INDlc:.ATe"'ICJOt't~, : IINDI"'Te~·DI~~"nIIIIJI:.TU) o1Ie!!,..ICJOt't~.SKT""".2.' .. _ .. /~LQClIIt .... AGC.. ~1~~~:_ ...... .5. an IIJ.J.HMATaJ ~T 6IeM .... NO"TS'. RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 1 PLAN SGALE, 3/92".1·-0'· ~ __ TDTI-I!~/JtU.(JII'.TIJI:)(r'.D~. ~/JtU.",.~tf'Q4J."oOIGet1f'''''T =-~~,.NtTTI¥ILUUXQ. 2.~I¥ILUTDfII!206."II.CM."""".AlXQJ. E~~:~~n:..TY?''':~frp 5."""~NG~~T"1"1'5 =~~1U..DIIIIIo"1"ICMo" ... _"",",,"n!-""~~"~1It ~"""""/'MDCDIII!~TIOfOOIMeec.""",,,.,. I~r 1'1-IE~~= Parkside at 95 Burnett _ OUII.UII'lUi "'L..I'U'II !'IV I co. l.teellOl~,"TI'\.OCIItIl"\...'lll!lIMes.T1OI'A$ I'QIII:toeT.-...zD~"nOk~ GCle1"lll.ll:.TIOI\~eT(:.J 2.~tr£~~~r::.=~ /I:Ief ........ c:.ore'""TIOI\~~J 1I.~~":.~==e::t 5IeeT ••• UI'Qlll:~(JII'1I.Il.QIIr6. ... ~~TDI!I!P'IIII!~ '" ~1I"n!~IN"""""I>lP'QllDeTA.UD ~""""OIIIII"n!~nIIi5.~,~ 1YrU.6.~Tet&.~~.rr:N. "'" I 1UDN>0UN a ~II TSA'""hilrtIJ.Jo.lb. 5IIn'_"_I..E._:III1 --''1'''_ TQ.i.OOUQlI'Q.i.OO\DUCI ~u 0ci 0Y o o 0l 0- 0- 0- 0, 8- t ' -0 0 0 0 -0 0 0 -0 _ -i-- • 0 0 o o e~r"_ =-~~~ D 'I'OIGA1'Sl1N.J..f'I"'II"e, ~1'¥oI..L~~M.I. ,...--, IICl'IGA~50·""'·Io4Ne,NI!IIU" o lIo.'~~T"'" 1 IIIf"AI2"'T""~.n"I""T~ -I'VDleGOIf<eC,TlOM ..... T(.I(. '--_oJ ".DI't!!ll_I.NI~(OICe...:~ e.o.T"T'I:!I'tT~ ~""'TI A~"'Lt6H'I". , ... -... ~ c::::> ~~~: 51fT ""'.2. r\ .. _ .... )='==-.I)I~LIIOM~Tm c::::>1~~~:5HT ...... .5 am IWMNATeP~TMHMMCJTep ~oo. Me TO ne"J>C,e CIf'.'I\IO (1""-.). "JlGeC1l'~tr'DGJ."~orI"lOaT =-~~"Nm'rw.all.ND. 2.~I'W..LaTO~~.n.ot.'M'.IUKDJ. ~~nc:::-,~~~~~~ """.~J. !l.~~NiD""""~1YI"et NIO~2!IIUIt.DIIIIIo-.~" vc.TlQIoI". """"~~~III!I!IUI.DIIeeec;T1ONI'" 1I!£11CIN"NIO~III!I:.T1ONI""III!IC;T1OItM. RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 2 PLAN (LEVELS 3 AND 4 SIM.) SCALE. 3, ....... _._ ..... ~II-1'1-IE-~= Parkslde al 95 Burnett _ 1.KZIIOI'I\CWIl.,,"TI'\.OOIIt~"Kt.I'IOIIM """DI!t..-...zD~T1Ok(l»eel~ UIIOTIUoTlD".~~Tt.J 2.1I!!!~.T~"rOllltCDlll!CIIUII'IIJ<6& INee:.TlClNM_I:lII!TAIU:tI~11ClIt /tIefN\..S,c;.(IIO~TIOI\~~J a·~L~~I'QIl~ ~~~~~ ".ne!UU;ll"I.TOI!II!NtI!~ -. "~II'11!~INIeC.TlC:lNIoJ"""oer .... L.eD IM"OI'M'TlOIIOIIItIl'l1!~~r..~ JlW.lA,P'I\.J'r6~I"\..NU1!N,I'W.JI:&..~ =J !0 '~0 ~ '-0 -10 8 i ... ,."",... ~ ~II TSA'.rfhj/tttJ'J-1b. 5011~A ..... SA_:IlI -.....,,",..,. TGHIlIM2IPQHDt1lllO ~n 000 I I I ·0 I I 0 0 ::: CD c:::: .... :::J m 10 0) -as CD '1::J "0 ~ Z ~ .... ·0 as n.. 9 a.. LL. ~ ~ o ~ 8 O~ J c::: ~ I lIlT 1 I~ ;J, 0@ 00 z o ~ [ij ...J W ::I: ~ o z z o ~ > W ...J W J: I-:::J o en :t: CI) c ... :l m 10 0) -as CI) 'C .;; ~ ... as Q. I I ~ 8 I I / i i // I ------~- o Wv -_____ /)('1 BURNETT AVENUE SOUTH ___ _ --':JQ12Q.'41Lf ___ _ .,.,..,. -(~ _ ........ • --, STREET LEVEL PLANT SCHEDULE .............. --.-,., ..... -..... - CDUII'JQHI''''' .... MOctUtA'»GMII!II' ~ C. 'AM'IOC:IU1" ~T."",*,,1\I1' ~ .. 'MoItE.It 2" Cal.ee. D' ........ "ClLee.It'~ ... j.Vl'CIl, ae," 1"11. II. ,-. ~ .............. m- _c.o._ ---ICIIl. ... ~· IGII."c.:.. t::::::::::::::::::::1 "'I.AIN~ .. - SUGGESTED CONTAINER PLANTS .,.,..,. ...... -0 ..... -""""'-I: RU.""" ...... .w:a:~N.L...a:w ....... ..-...... ~~'CClIW.atIIC' """",,",c.-.. ..-.."......-.. 0 """" ... ..... ~ De -0 ... _ ..... PNClR'U1lBWC' ~ MW' . ..... .... _"'" PMi:R1U1l&1Alc ' .uat.,.,.,,. ...... ..... ~ -...0-...... -"""""'" """"'--...... -IEIII1v,IA'AI1'IItCJOr' ...... ...... ...... -. ..... -.. ~ ......" _ .... "'" ---...-"'" -_ .... "'" _. ~"''DG~ --~ ""'---I· ..... -BI:WI1'\a".'l!l"BW.DcwmT'f" JK! ....... _c.o.....,.,.. . ..... ..... _VAl< . ..... hfi..j---i~ SCALE: l' a 10' •• ~:.r BURNETT 85 Renton, WA '"".:.,.-.... --....... - .., .... .~ -:':1' . LANDSCAPE -'} PLAN " "T . ~.:; L-1.0 4 BURNETT AVENUE SOUTH , --@ o --...---f"'IIICII"CeRLJrIIM.aH , , , , , , -,----8: <:;, <0, , , , ........ - STREET LEVEL PLANT SCHEDULE e'TteOL CCI!'f1!2N HM'W pot..rtteAL '*"' till .... ~ ""'"'''''''''--=ooAT ...... _""'na ~A·.AMIIra' ~c:.'~l' ~T.MTbIA'RIf J"c:.tl,Be.D'I'k'" rca.De,D'1"k1L I-ll:l"Cll.ee.ID'~~ • CllWlPfIaNI' .... ..". -. ~ ....... --m-(::::::::::,,::::::1 __ _ I"Itta1II1P.\W1!Ut , ...... ......... -I .... Wac. ---I_Wee.. SUGGESTED CONTAINER PLANTS .- 0 """""-""""''''''''''' loe ..... """'-. oIIC:8ItJolflllCMCU1N.Lt1DCIM' -_ ...... ~~'CQUL1lWK' I: -..-_It-...-.. 0 ........... -~ ...... 0 ---""" P'tIrJN'Uf18Wc.TBJ.CIII .... W' ..... ---...... ....,...... TDIAX '..woc. ..... '" . .... co.-""""""", .............. -..... ......,.,""""""" """"'--..... ...... IBVtWrA'.r&n\I'IoIJDT" . .... ....... -..... --Ilm! _P. ~ ....,.. ........ -I: '"""-_P. NOIT .... ~ """'""""" m ..... -_0Il<>EN0II --1!!LIi:Wt1'tII,..!t'eIWDcYI!In" IT'~ ......... _ .... -~~~ ""'" ...... v ... )M.. :]J ( ~ '-;.1:' hf-l....j----i ~ SCALE: 1· = 10" •• ,. r-. ";:;, ,~- BURNETT 95 Renton, WA '"":.,.'- """ oeM ---.... - .., ..... • ::-.. ; LANDSCAPE " PLAN .;", L-1.1 , ~ , i JI j I I S I ~ i I .-: .. ;: TREE CONDITION EVALUATION AND IMPACT MAP Parkside at 95 Burnett ~ Scale 1" = 20' I_-_~-'_-'--~-' ,~---==:J o 10 20 ··········30 . "AO Tree T,., ~,~~ H~~ht Spreadl ~~~ • So Drioline 11 PSME 11 35 15 80 12 PSME 8 20 10 75 13 PSME 10 35 15 75 14 PINI 11 20 15 75 15 PINI 10 20 15 75 16 PINI 20 30 22 80 20 PINt 17 20 22 75 21 PINI 14 20 17 80 22 PIN! 14 25 20 80 23 PINI 15 25 20 80 26 CULE 22 35 25 85 27 PSME 15 35 30 70 28 PSME 16 35 30 70 29 PSME 14 30 30 75 ~, / Condition Ratina Tree Condition Notes/lmoacts 1 Very nood condition/crown could be affected 1 VerY aood condition/crown could be affected 1 VerY oDad condition/crown could be affected 1 Verv nood condition/crown could be affected 1 Very ooad condition/crown could be affected 1 VerY oood condition/crown could be affected 1 Very Qoad condition/crown could be affected 1 Very oood condition/crown could be affected 1 Very oood condition/crown CQuid be affected 1 Verv nood condition/crown could be affected 1 Very Qood condition/crown could be affected 1 VerY oood condition/crown could be affected 1 Very aood conditionlcrown could be affected 1 Very Qood conditio nino impacts noted Ice..e...1t ~ Number of tree as identified on the accompanying map Ire..e....S.g ~ Tree species tricode ACRU-Acer rubrum (red maple) CULE_J( Cupressocypans leylandu (Leyland Cypress) PINI"'Plnus nigra (Austrian pine) PSME-Pseudotsuga menziesil (Douglas fir) [lb.b ~ Diameter in Inches at 4.5' above the eJ(isting grade !::!.e.lgbt • ApproJ(imate height of tree in feet Spread/Odpline • MaJ(imum crown spread/dripline diameter in feet LCR (Live crown ratio) ~ The percentage of trunk area/length With live branch material. I CR values less than 35 are considered low. Condition Rating ~ An arbitrary value relating to the condition and hazard potential of the tree based upon health and defects, and assuming presence of a target , ~ EJ(celient condition 2 . Good condition 3 ~ Fair condition, retention allowed provided impacts aren't eJ(tensive 3.5 ~ Fair health, however conditions may warrant removal 4 ~ Poor condition, removal recommended Tree Condition Notes ~ Specific information on condition of the evaluated tree RETAIN/ REMOVE RETAIN RETAIN RETAIN RETAIN RETAIN RETAIN RETAIN RETAIN RETAIN RETAIN RETAIN RETAIN RETAIN RETAIN Renton, WA BURNETT AVENUE SClTfH Arboricultural Consulting Tony Shoffner Consulting Amorist, Horticulturist ISA Certified Arboris! #PN-0909 Member, American Society of Consulting Arborists 1'0 Box 135 Mountlake Terrace, WA 9H043-0135 Phone ami Fax: (425) 776"()850 Mohile (20(i)755~2R71 email: arboricultural.eonsilltin~(ii)verizon.nel TREE EVALUATION AND IMPACT MAP PARKSIDE A T BURNETT 95 heet #L·l.2 ate: October 18, 2004 nthony v. Shoffner~ CITY OF RENTON, WA Colpitts Development Company, LLC 2256 38th PI. East Seattle, WA 98112 ISA Certified Amorist #PN-0909A; Member, American Society of Consulting Arborists l- I- W Z a: ::> co LO m ::J ii ~ < I ; : ~I~ J -H :; ;i~ I . , ., ~'> « UI l- I J =: Q) c L-:::l m 10 0) -a! Q) 'C "as .lI:: L-a! a. ~ 8 I J ! ~ ~ Ii i 1J~l L..... I-w w J: rn w ..J I-i= ~z U 0g I~ ~~ 0 tl~ ~U ~~ . ~ I ~!! , • I , IIIII f ~ ~ ~ ! By. ", By. BA819 OF BEARING SOR'¥t.YB'I'~1N PAGE 220, UNDER KIN-NUMBER 18ie0707QOO REFERENCES' "PACE"BIII30P0220 "SCHNEIlER"EII<lOl1PG I300K 130 Of SUffv'tYS. COONTY RE"""""" ~ REC"etI0707IOOOI' R£C#iSl'078OO2 llEBIICAL ~AI VERTICAL DATUM aTY OF RENToN aw,,, -TOP or 1/.-YOM. AT C/l Of e/l Of s. 2HD ST. F[[1) BRASS PIN SET IN CONI MORRIS AVE '" 12' N I E1.£V. 11.043 iii (lLa: LEGAL DE8CRIPTlOH; I£gAL I2E~QBlf n IIIlBtfEIIbWtI:~ THof.TPftOllOHOF1M[1 HENR'I' H. TOBIN ~TIOH lNCI a.AIU NO. 37, PARCEl. 8 ACTION I<*-018-uA RECOROINC f2004041390001!StUA 'IF Tll£ N.£. 1/4 sa:TIOM 18, TOWt&IP 2J NORTlt, RNtCE Of REHTON LAND USE , F~~4..g IiIERIlWt, IN lONG COONT'I'. WASHINaTOH. !IS BURN£TT A\'ENU£ SOIJTlr. i:i Bl1BtIEII6l/El1!E SI: OONo\lJOH l.AHO CI..MI or DIilHA B. SWlTHERS, FAWILY or lW, NolO TH( HEIRS AT LAW OF HEHR'I' H. TOBIN, DECEASED. 010. 31 I..OCATEO IN PNnS OF' SEC1lOHS 17. 111 AHD 20. RANGE 5 EAST, WII.l.ANETTE MERlow.. IN KING CXIlIKTY, "'........., 110 fEET WEST or THE NORTHWEST CORNER Of BlOC!( 24 ON • ..ccoROINC 10 THE PlAT THEREOf'. AtCOROEO IN VOI..lAI[ , IN IONO COUNTY, WASHINGTON; fE'ET. THENCE WEST 109.5 FEET 10 THE HORHTtRH PACIFlC Y: THEHa: t«lfmt AlOMG lHE EAST UNE Of SAID RIGHT OF EAST 109.5 FEET; Tl1ENCE SOUTH 283.5 FEET TO THE POINT THE NORTH 12 FEET lltEREOf. TAX PARCEL NUMBER8 n euANm AVENUE 000720014802 9~ BURN£TT AVENUE SOUTH: 000720007301 RECOMMENDED fOR APPROYAl ------------i By. ----l::.k~."'''_'.-~-.-".""-""'~-.. -"'-"'-"_. SEC. 17., T. 23 N., A. SE, W.M. 95 BURNETT ENTITLEMENT PARKSIDE AT SITE PLAN October 5, 2004 prepared for TSA ARCHITECTS prepared by II iii II Site Development Associates, LLC 10116 Moln Street. SuJte 106: Bothell. Washington 98011 Office: 425.486.6533 Fax: 0425.486.6593 W'WW.sdoeng:ineer1.com APPUCANT: ENGINEER: SURVEYOR:. SHEET INDEX TSA Archltectl Kent Smutny 50 118th AVI SE. Suit. 201 BenevuI, WA. 88004 Phono: (428) 401-0828 81te Development A •• oolat ... UC wnUam Heilley, P.E. 10118 Main 8Ir .. ~ 8u1t. 100 Botho/!, WA 88011 Phono: (428) 480-8833 BA8EUNE Eng/noor/ng. INC. 1810 84th Avenue We.t Tacoma, WA D8"'88 Phon.: (283) 888-4481 L1fI~Wf !rtU! Ig;gl~~"",,, .' ~ , . :!~r ~:. .-.. - • Y. ): ....... , .. (r -) ~ -~ "., """",;l j !I : D "I .. I~ g=l lIIill II! ~n III ~i ~ [II ~I ; ~L III ~~ R -; OJ ! c: ... ::;) al U) d C» .J .J -.; « ., G) 1 "t:l » ·iii , "" 1: iii I D.. ., ~ f C1.0 200327~ I: , r · -; ..., ... ..,.., am CITY OF · _ ® ~RENTON ~ i NO '"_ I ,,;.:;. I ""U' .... _~ ... _ 0."-SITE PLAN ~C2 0 .;". u__ f1f MT! N'PR _ Gr.v9l11nnannOi1P.£..NttnI~ ~ j ,!f,!f,!f,!f ,-• -. • r i .. I ' l~. ~ ~/ I : ~ J f ;I~ '> CI i: 'V :u o < m ~ m z -i UI m o -i (5 Z I: i ~'~ Iss G~g ~8~ ~~ \ \ --r] , ~\ '-I \ III \ ." J;;)J', ~II~~ \ II ~U CI --< g Z i -0 ::::0 ::::0 "-.-/ CB 1°' RIt.\nj~.90 IE~II.40 8" PVC SE :EB ;: !!.lJa : ~ ~ ~'-~ ;'-'; , :', :)"~ ,: .. :\ 10/5/200. ,,' -' .. ' \,., . '131-001..0. ~, '* ,,) /) i o -<7~ C' r«; --1 --1 I fTl l :-<7 I '! "'~ , "'''' , (") , , -(11 , 00,. , "-z , ~~ l ~::E I 0", , ~;o ! IGj , 00 :;. ": (» tJ) C) CB I RIM~35.91 -1~1 8" CONC W/NW --~ I \I" 1/tl>i2o:::i: CB I BRICK SSMH II 48" RIM~36.46 RIM=3611 IE=35.11 4" GALVANIZED W/NW IE~26,31 8" PVC N IE~26.46 8"? S IE=26.36 8" PVC LADDER W E SSMH II 48" RIM~36.67 ~ ____ 'E~27.69 8" PVC N IE~27.92 8" PVC S W ".1 IE=31.67 DROP PVC S IE=27.87 8"0 W ----:;:tt:; 709.50" SSMH II 48" ( _-, RIM~36.12 ~,4 IE=15.92 16" '/-0 E <0 '" 1<7~ ;1 !E~16.02 16"+-/ ? IV v' , LADDER SW ~, n ~' '-/', ~ SDMH II 48" : y R~~~ : ~ ~~8~N ~!It co " , '-Y !E~30.96 8" PVC E ::...~~,--N8i'~'4'~.;o.2''W IE~30.31 8" CONC S -----=-70[j.50.-----~-'CB I 1[~33.46 12" ADS W ~ C l C ~ C) C) ,,, ~ 'J) -j :2' co «) ~ ~ C) C3 en ~l :00 "1 'S:: C) ~ <:J '"' -j 'i'i '-'-~ CN N RIM~36.25 IE~34.25 12 ADS E ~-I"""""" ~ ~ ;-I I\) Co> Z .............. /!..~ // .~~ :u j/ ----z.. ~CB 2' N\S X 0.8 E\VI , RIM~36.43 (II !II ~ ~ '" i! IE~35,63 G" CONC E 1~ .... ~~.Jii i ;f1r----CB 1 BRICK I I RIM~36.84 30' ~ 1 I , I 'I' " ..... 1 ~ IE~35.54 6" CONC IV I ~-SDMH II BRICK RIM=37.24 1[=31.34 8" CONe: s IE~31.39 8" CONC N IE~33.04 6" CONC E IE~33.04 6" CONC IV IE~31.66 g" CMP SE -SSCO RIM=37,31 -----IE=35.79 10" CONC 'Ir/r CO." 'Or ~ &, .?~ $--------,-, , , , , , I I I , , I -------------------------------~ 2 I , I , I , , , , I , -------------------------------~ 3 , , , , , I , i m, ~-I Parkside At 95 Burnett I\) S nl Site Development Associates. LlC • ~ ~ 81TE PLAN II IOI1"'d'Short,,*IC»:IoIt*.~fIOIl Oat.: 8y: O.ac tk)n: , " ,. ,PH ,"OPE"" "" ''''." :J 1111111 4"? 4"? VI 'VC N --< C:j ~ 00 ~ o ~ I " I -., : =ti l~ I I I I I I I I IN N CB I RIM=35.91 -I~l ~NC VI/NVI 1---+-+I~hw------ 11 a SSMH II 48" RIM=36.46 IE=26.31 8" PVC N IE=26.46 8"? S IE=26.36 8" PVC LADDER VI E SSMH II 48" RIM=36.67 IE=27.69 8" PVC N '''------IE=27.92 8" PVC S SSMH II 48" RIM=36.12 IE=31.67 DROP PVC S IE=27.87 8"? VI IE=15.92 16"+/-? E IE=16.02 16"+-/ ? VI LADDER SVI SDMH II 48" RIM=.36.76 IE=30.33 8 CONC N 1[=3096 8" PVC E IE=30.31 8" CONC S IE=33.46 12" ADS VI CB I RIM=36.25 IE=34.25 12 ADS E /t''''M--c' CB 2' N\S X 0.8 E\VI I RIM=36.43 : IE=35.6.3 6" CONC E ~~~~~~~~~~I' I I ~I-CB I BRICK ,I, ~ RIM=36.84 i ~I~ IE=35.54 6" CONG VI I ~_ SDMH II BRICK \'1 I RIM=37.24 , • 1[=31.34 8" CONC S IE=31.39 8" CONC N IE=33.04 6" CONG E IE=33.04 6" CONC VI IE;31.66 9" CMP SE SSCO l-e l c ~ RIM=37.31 -----IE=35.79 10" CONG s---------,- I I I I I I N88'29'12"W ;. CB \~ RI -!;l.90 IE=~ 40 8" PVC SE --- \ . 10/5/2004 131-001-04 N (') ! ~ U> 9 . ~ 10 00 Parkside At 95 Burnett ~: UTIUTIE8 PLAN CD ColpUta Development Co. l.L.C. R .... ton.WA S~e Development Associates, lie IOll'~s..t ..... IQI;IoIhII.WGItt"ogtont8)11 ~--------------~ I I I I I I '-------------------------------~ 2 I I I I I I I I I I I I -------------------------------t 3 Oat.: By. D .. ertpUon: I I I I I I I r~~~~_ ~~==~I -§J--!.~I)~'.~~W-lI~~~~ __ ~~~~~-~~~~I~~~~_~~=-IL-=r_~~~~:~~~I~~~;pe~~~=~~~~=N~~~~Mo:~=.=~~~~D~R~A~I~N~A_G_E __ C_O_N_T_R_O_L __ P_L_A_N __ -1~~~~&J " REVISION fit D*.TE APPR GrW9iJ~PL.~ ~ ~ I ~) -<)' 0; -i ~II II f I, -1'---_._- i ; i /.1 J\~ i 0 -Y~ ~ ~. f If If If If I j , I I " !--.=.=.:2-J... I ' J\ E t:. i 0/\ ~ 3 3 ' H-1-t-c=-7'-~~~3591 I \filXl / J\~ <:l. ~ i :'<f ~ r-:--I~l ~~c~_ I ! ,f,J.,' ,f S I ;. ~"/n ". ~ i L i -y ~ ~II L ® ---! I \\~ // S ~ i ~~ j ~ ill (\ '\ -!~\~~-----~~~:::"f.'7 7io~;jJ~ ..J.,lJ~: ~ ~~] '-!\ " "I' I __ J 0'" I I~ ~: '. L.,..-.,-IE=3489 8" CONC N la, ~'----T:, ------V" ' • I --, '" C1 I Ii CB I BRICK :: *':,-::::u : ns f-o---N ~. RIM=36.11 . ~ : I'l : ~ : ~ , I f-SSMH II 48" IE=35.11 4" GALVANIZED W/NW f N I !""I! 'Y' I I Z I Ii ,~~;;~:68" pvc N 1 ;~~ -~' 0-i1P~*~1~-~--2-~L~---~---t-"5,,~:o-~-:o~i~~:~.:lg;:-~-l~:;g--~-g--~-~-i-~Ih S "'-~' I :~:~~;~ r p~c E " I : S os ~ 1 ~ LADDER W SSMH II 48 • I , #. -_ ~ ~ RIM=36.67 : >;; * F ~/, I ~ ~ I I I ~ IE=27.69 8" PVC N ii, ~ "I'-I--~ N88"~9'12.rW -----l ~. I' 11!li~~~_t'--W-:~:~~~~ g~;pvcpic S 4"? N ·t-l ~ * L I 1 I I SSMH II 48" IE;27.87 8"? W 4"? E "', "I'-____ ~--,109,50" , ClJr-.~' RIM=36.12 W ~\ IRR. VALI£. ~ * ~ ,0} ~,IE=15.9216"+/-? E • "I'-(Q m/'ft/\ 'IJWD.-,=r ~ t ::;:Ob~~2S~6"+-/ ? W ~ . *'" ~1'rO :;.. I"",,_~, ~SDMHII48" '') <: ~ IN:0 RIM=36.76 "VC N I'" ~ ~ i "() I :~:~H~ r~6~/s a 1-o;------N8i'~"4W.:J,2''W ~ --1 ," ~ ~ ~~==-70ii5O"== <: I ~~~M~~:~:5346 12" ADS IV A!J (; ':l I IE;34.25 12 ADS E M '\ i ~ ~. I ~* ~ ~I ~ \. !;.~ ~-1 ,~~: iii:' ; j l, : ~ \ ~.\ ';::!'-I h _ :~~'--""J CB z· ,~\S X 0.8 E\W /IJ I : ~ I'l: a~ l--1 j HiM~.35.43 ~ \ IRR VALvr: ~ : ~ ~ i ~ ./' Ar,/' _ i 1[:,_" .J~S.63 6" CONe E -r-T[ " i. ~.')' '" : -...c 'l-lIsoIiidlF'''--.-'· ...,' -gj l. . I -I ~ (Jl I I ----·-C8 I BRICK -rJ .' C!) Ii;;:: ,/'-. i RiM~36.84 ........ f (" : Cl OJ I IE~3554 6" CONC W r---. '/1 :;;'1' I 5 OJ!.. t--.. J ""I': I 8 ~ -------~ CI) 0, I I '--SDMH II BRICK _-< .,,: ~,lN : a ~ \. I RIM=37 24 '1 i :;: 1'0 : c:: I'" ,t=31 34 8" CONe 5 u I"; I I IE;31 39 8" CONC N ::,'~'-'-:..,... \ 1£=3304 6 CONC E I --I I ~'E''''33.04 6" CONC W : L I II J SSCO ~ c c. c ~ ..-J! ~ I IE=31.66 g" CMP SE I f=.---:lIIIIUII--l.!fl2tr-IifIM'Il RIM; 3 7.31 i J i --§~ °li' -~' !'-K----IE=3579 10" CONC S--------T I 1nO'in' r I ", I J ~"'" I ;. CB Iq RI"If :i.90 IE~ 40 8" PVC SE [ t " 10/S/2004 c-o " ~ ~~ 0 ~ ;~ ~ Oz . ~> L:: 0 ~gt L- N88"29'72"'W ~ ---I II' co", i ~/Nta 1 I I '0/ 1 1: ~ 1fHf---t--.:.<' I J ' &, : .0011 1 <~ i focil 30' I ----------.. ---------------.. ----1- { I J 2 ! 1 ! 1 11 i--~r r~-lte-De-Iii-ve-I~-pm--e-nt-Assoc---ia-te...:.S"-Ll-C.:......--...:..,~::y~~."!;.;;;~f{. D.t.. Br. D •• c''''tlc~ I 101"MC*'IShoet.SlAtlQ6;loINIl~tllll' \ I \ \ " : \. 131~001-o4 )( H )( 'P~r!<-side, At 95 Burnett DRAINAGe CONTROL PLAN i ~ f i r I : Z ~ ~ ~ "'tl I» ..., " Cb c: (I) I» -(0 0'1 ····c OJ c: ..., ::J (I) -- SITE PlAN REVIEW SUBMITIAL 10/18/04 II ~ > ~ > ~ I I i i f I fl I r f; I ""C III ., ~ (J) c: (\) III .-+ CD 01 1m c:: 13 (\) .-+ .-+ I , I ~ I .... (j) ~ W !-d ~ ~.,. I" ~! gf' I SITE PLAN REVIEW SUBMmAL 10/18/04 Jam Free Printing -* '2 Use Avery® TEMPLATE 5160® Les Sherrill 42-117 Old Kalanianaole Rd Kailua, HI 96734 --I ( , I Louis Caniparoli 84 Logan Ave S 'I Renton, WA 98055 www.avery.com 1-800-GO-AVERY I Ii ( i I ~ AVERY® 5160® Angelo Righi 1109 N 37th St Renton, W A 98056 J'l ~------------------~--~ (~----------------------I'r William Provin ( Juliet Tharp : 359 Thomas Ave SW Renton, W A 98055 Walter & Sharon Austin 14823 47th Ave E I Tacorrm, WA 98446 ( I , I ( -~-------- Pyuong Su Bonner i' PO Box 853 Bellevue, W A 98009 James & Renee Dawson 10838 Lake Ridge Dr S Seattle, W A 98178 [ '( Tennessee Group L L C i 710 S 2nd St I : l 81 Logan Ave S Renton, W A 98055 Russell Storwick 1510 9th St Anacortes, W A 98221 Richard & Betty Stauff 13813 139th Ave SE Renton, W A 98059 " ,( Aileen Egawa ! I Renton, W A 98055 I I 91 Williams Ave S Renton, W A 98055 i I ~~-------------~---~ Robert Cooper Margaret & Robert Schmidt I 7136 S Sunnycrest Rd Seattle, W A 98178 87 Williams Ave S Renton, WA 98055 Darreld & Nancy Gudmunson 102 Lake Ave S Renton, W A 98055 James & Joanne Medzegian 79-81 S Williams Ave Renton, WA 98055 r------------~---'----~ ( SalvationArmy I ' PO Box 9219 , Seattle, W A 98109 ) i '> \ Authority Housing I PO Box 2316 Renton, W A 98056 I ~ I William Calloway & Lorraine Sanford 55 Williams Ave S #101 ------------~------) Renton, WA 98055 AH3/\ V-m)-008-~ wo)",{JaJ\e·MMM -- Richard & Betty Stauff 13813 139th Ave SE Renton, W A 98059 , ' \,. \ ,( V' 1 M kin I 10 et ea 7100 S Taft St I Seattle, W A 98178 I " ~------1'( "' > . , , BnsfRwy Co PO Box 961089 I Fort Worth, TX 76161 Douglas & Veda Frederick 55 Williams Ave S #102 Renton, WA 98055 ®09~S 3lVldW31 ®,{J9"V asn 6ur~U!Jd a9J:I wer I ) Jam Free Printing -www.avery.com \i AVERY® 5160® Use Avery® TEMPLATE 5160® -1-800-GO-AVERY i Shirley Llewellyn I Lois May Smith Bonnie Baxter 55 Williams Ave S #406 55 Williams Ave S #407 55 Williams Ave S #408 , , Renton, WA 98055 Renton, W A 98055 Renton, W A 98055 l ' I '\, ( , Stefani Babcock Marylou Sigette , I Terry Kowing 55 Williams Ave S #409 117 Logan Ave S 109 Logan Ave S Renton, W A 98055 Renton, W A 98055 I, Renton, WA 98055 ! I I, ) '\ Terry Kowing Pan's Development Corporation John & Jackie Knippel 109 Logan Ave S 6947 Coal Creek Pkwy SE #260 97 Logan Ave S Renton, W A 98055 Newcastle, W A 98059 Renton, WA 98055 l J I ~, ) '\ ''I ' ( '\ Washington Mutual Savgings Bank I Bryan & Jennifer Zug Mary Lou Sigette PO Box 7788 1,1 117 Burnett PI S I 116 Logan Ave S Newport Beach, CA 92658 Renton, WA 98055 ' , Renton, W A 98055 I . \ l I \ , , '\ \ .. Thanh Nguyen 212 Wells Llc I Khanh & Hoa Lu I I : 'I I 713 SW 353rd PI 212 Wells Ave S #J 13414 SE 85th St Federal Way, WA 98023 Renton, W A 98055 . I Renton, W A 98059 I-------~' 1 Richard & Betty Stauff I , Richard & Karen Kaercher "\ I 13813 139thAve SE I i POBox 8 Renton, W A 98059 I Hobart, W A 98025 I I, I ~ Donald Erne ~ ~ I \, . \ ( Richard & Karen Kaercher "\, i i I I 14415 12th Ave SW POBox 8 I Seattle, WA 98166 , i Hobart, W A 98025 I I I I I I \ ;-'\ Ruby & Boden Sandra Heitman I Glenn Reynolds I 50 Logan Ave S 55 Logan Ave S Renton, W A 98055 I I Renton, WA 98055 I ! I, I , < . )....-, James Boland \ ( Mclendon Hardware Inc Alex Cugini Jr. '\ I 51 Logan Ave S 710 S 2nd St 611 Renton Ave S Renton, W A 98055 Renton, WA 98055 Renton, W A 98055 '~'l ----. __ .-'. (-~-. --._-_._---I I I I I ! ' i I \.~~-------.-J j '\ '---'----) AH31\"-m)-OO8-~ -e09~S UYldllllU ei.J9A'fJ asn WO)·,{JaAe·MMM -6u!~U!Jd a9J:I wer r i I I I \. I , ~ ~- \. Jam Free Printing Use Avery® TEMPLATE 5160® Patricia Tonkin 55 Williams Ave S #104 Renton, WA 98055 Marianne Pantano 55 Williams Ave S #107 Renton, WA 98055 Ronald & Marie Braaten 55 Williams Ave S #110 Renton, W A 98055 Florence Bragg 55 Williams Ave S #203 Renton, W A 98055 Joan Bates 55 Williams Ave S #206 Renton, WA 98055 Centex Homes 2320 130th Ave NE Bellevue, W A 98005 Pauline Hiersche & Edgar Hiersch 55 Williams Ave S #303 Renton, WA 98055 Jane Goodwin 55 Williams Ave S #306 Renton, WA 98055 ' Jenny Laville 55 Williams Ave S #309 , Renton, WA 98055 , Donald Clark 55 Williams Ave S #403 Renton, WA 98055 I, , , ~, , . I I I ~, I I ) 'I I I ~ \ '\ I I , 1 ~ I >. I I l I I \. , l --wwwoaveryocom 1-800-GO-AVERY ~ AVERY® 5160® Bruce & Catherine Pope 55 Williams Ave S #105 Renton, WA 98055 Harry & Teresita Shantley 55 Williams Ave S #108 Renton, W A 98055 Liquid Properties LIp 1922 42nd Ave E #22 Seattle, WA 98112 Marilyn Pearson 55 Williams Ave S #204 Renton, W A 98055 Louise & Samuel Mckinney 55 Williams Ave S #207 Renton, W A 98055 Jason Stenklyft 55 Williams Ave S #301 Renton, WA 98055 Mary Brown 55 Williams Ave S #304 Renton, WA 98055 Harry & Debra Leroy 55 Williams Ave S #307 Renton, WA 98055 i : r Rodney & Linda Hand~y Jr. . I 55 Williams Ave S #106 Renton, WA 98055 I' ) , '1 I : I \. · ( I' ' II I' I i, ' "-1',' " i "'I I ~ , · , I , , , , '\ , : I I · ! Gaile Jannsen 55 Williams Ave S #109 Renton, W A 98055 Pilla & Edward Leitner 55 Williams Ave S #202 Renton, W A 98055 Clow 55 Williams Ave S #203 Renton, WA 98055 Jay Hori & Michael Hori 15 S Grady Way #249 Renton, W A 98055 Robert Parmele 55 Williams Ave S #302 Renton, WA 98055 Ivona Little 55 Williams Ave S #305 Renton, WA 98055 Eric Cameron 55 Williams Ave S #308 Renton, WA 98055 ( Mary Ellingson 'I ( Joan Wilson I 55 Williams Ave S #401 Renton, W A 98055 Victor & Robbi Karpiak 55 Williams Ave S #404 Renton, W A 98055 AH3'W-09-008-~ WO)°,{JaAeoMMM -- I, , 55 Williams Ave S #402 Renton, W A 98055 Alindrina Mangubat 55 Williams Ave S #405 Renton, WA 98055 ®09~5 UYldllllU ®,{J8Nf/ asn 6u!lU!Jd aaJ~ wer : ) 'I I \ I I '\ I --") PARTIES OF RECORD PARKSIDE AT 95 BURNETT AVE LUA04-133, SA-H, ECF, CU-H Kent Smutny TSA Architects, PLLC 50 116th Avenue SE ste: #201 Bellevue, WA 98004 tel: 425-401-6828 eml: kents@tsaarchitects.com ( contact) Donald C. Erue Parkside at 95 Burnett LLC 2256 38th Place E Seattle, WA 98112 tel: 206-322-1381 (owner) Mary Brown Robert T. Cooper 87 Williams Avenue 5 Renton, WA 98055 tel: 425-255-8098 (party of record) Bruce & Cathy Pope 14415 12th Avenue SW Seattle, WA 98166 55 Williams Avenue 5 ste: #304 Renton, WA 98055 55 Williams Avenue 5 ste: #105 Renton, WA 98055 tel: 206-243-4459 (party of record) (party of record) tel: 425-235-5063 (party of record) (Page 1 of 1) -. , .~ '. l-vi A-ot.l-I~ 3 I.·t. Return Address: City Clerk's Office City of Renton IIIIIUI III II 20070821001 02 1055 South Grady Way Renton, W A 98055 Bll.LOFSALE CITY OF RENTON BS 41.00 PAGE001 OF 002 08/21/2007 14:23 KING COUNTY,IJA The Grantor. as named above, for, and in consideration ofmutuaI benefits, hereby grants, bargains, sells and delivers to the Grantee, as named above, the following described personal property: WATER SYSTEM: Length d:l ~ SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM: Length STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM: L.F. of' L.F. of L.F. of each of! each of; cacho!; L.F.of L.F. of L.F.of· cachof! each or! each of Size ~ -g 01 Water Main Water Main Water Main B .. GateVaIves .. Gate Valves Fire Hydrant Assemblies Size ~ Sewer Main Sewer Main " Sewer Main ---~.. Diameter Manholes .. Diameter Manholes ----.. Diameter Manholes ---- Size L.F. ()f; ll. L.F. of --"----. ~ Conqe\e. Storm Line Storm Line L.F. of· each of cacho! cachof " " Storm Line Storm Inlet/Outlet Storm Catch Basin Manhole STREET IMPROVEMENTS: (Including Curb, Gutter, Sidewalk, Asphalt Pavement) Curb, Gutter, Sidewalk \1121 L.F. Asphalt Pavement: \ 5c>3 SY or L.F. of Width STREET LIGHTING: # of Poles NA '1-//-07 By this,conveyance, Grantor will warrant and defend the we hereby made ooto the Grantee against all and every person or perSons, whomsoever, lawfully claiming or to claim the same. This conveyance shall bind the heirs, executors, administrators and assigns forever. -dJ8'S <l "l H:\F1LE.SYS\FRM\84HNDOUliBILLSALE.J)()(.'\MAB Page 1 Notary Seal must be within box Notary Seal must be within box Notary Seal must be within box INDIVIDUAL FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that ___ --:-____ _ __________________ signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be hislher/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary (Print) ______________ _ My appointment expires: ____________ _ Dated: REPRESENTATIVE FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF WASHINGTON) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that ________ _ __________________ signed this instrument, on oath stated that he/she/they was/were authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the and _____ --:-__ of to be the free and voluntary act of such party/parties for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary (Print} ______________ _ My appointment expires: ____________ _ Dated: CORPORATE FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) On this \ ~~ day of ~'-"'\ , 2<01 , before me personally appeared . --f~\LX.. ..1 ~~ f'rt\.AAD \ to me known to be ~ D~£a of the corporation that executed the within instrument, and acknowledge the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corp~~ion, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and each on oath stated th~she was authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. Notary Public in and eState of Washington Notary (Print)~\'"'C€; ,'\)f\'C0 My appointment expires:1.....>J."4=~....l..."\,.....1J:;l\= ..... \ ______ _ Dated: \~~ ~ .CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 4th day of January, 2005, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner documents. This information was sent to: Parkside at 95 Burnett LLC Owner Kent Smunty Contact Robert T. Cooper Party of Record Donald C. Erue Party of Record Mary Brown Party of Record Bruce & Cathy Pope Parties of Record "" ............... """,' (Signature of Sender): _-_........ ~'::~.~.k~'~',111 -.' \ss/ :::~'" I .: .... ~~ 0" ........... ~ '1, STATE OF WASHINGTON i :'uo "IO~ ~ ... ~ ~ : : ,'< '-1~ ~'. -n ~ SS , CJ) : ... J-::n~ ." ~ ~-I: ,() '" g;: ~ COUNTY OF KING ~ " \ UC1L/C .: : ~~ .. ~ .. ~ I \,. -.... ~ .-_ I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Patrick Roduin \ o~:~'f!.:9.? .... ~o~_: signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary ~~t,t~h\~~nd purposes mentioned in the instrument. \\,w .. ,,.\ ....... ' Date~ Notary (Print): ____ ....uMucAw.RIu...I'INU"-"KIAAI¥'MCwH'lEEFf __ --__________ _ My appointment expires: MY APPOINTMENTEXPIRES 6-29-07 Parkside at 95 Burnett LUA04-133, SA-H, ECF, CU-H Agencies See Attached Parkside at 95 Burnett. LLC Owner Kent Smutny Contact Robert T. Cooper Party of Record Donald C. Erue Party of Record Mary Brown Party of Record Bruce & Cathy Pope Party of Record (Signature of Sender)I:: L.~~~'I4:'-~~~~~~--------~~~N"'" .;,.. k"':" •••••••• : "'YA~II ··O~~ISSI°1:·:.,..0 ", ·'0 N ~'. ~ " ; / 01'.., "fi~{t\~ ~ (n : "~,.L -: '"Tl ~ , -I. ..0 ,__ :D ...... , ,)::>. v. .... m··', 'i~~ '&IIC 0.: : I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy Tucker V~o···~ <2.9. -...... j signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and vOlun~a~~'t~J(.~jl$ and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Il\l\? ... ~~,,~ ......... ··" SS STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING Dated9Jn J3, ~ f Washington Notary (Print): _____ *'M'A!AR'*"l:~YfI'd-4 ~1~!rftlMl/P.eI:llI1E~FF~----------- My appointment expires: rJr{ APPOINTMENT EXPiRfS n-?Q.07 Parkside at 95 Burnett LUA04-133, SA-H. ECF, CU-H template -affidavit of service by mailing Dept. of Ecology" Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 WSDOT Northwest Region" Attn: Ramin Pazooki King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240 PO Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 US Army Corp. of Engineers" Seattle District Office Attn: SEPA Reviewer PO Box C-3755 Seattle, WA 98124 Jamey Taylor" Depart. of Natural Resources PO Box 47015 Olympia, WA 98504-7015 KC Dev. & Environmental Servo Attn: SEPA Section 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 Metro Transit Senior Environmental Planner Gary Kriedt AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING (ERe DETERMINATIONS) WDFW -Stewart Reinbold" Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. c/o Department of Ecology " 3190 160th Ave SE Attn. SEPA Reviewer Bellevue, WA 98008 39015 -172nd Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092 Duwamish Tribal Office" Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program 4717 W Marginal Way SW " Seattle, WA 98106-1514 Attn: Ms Melissa Calvert 39015 172nd Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092-9763 KC Wastewater Treatment Division" Office of Archaeology & Historic Environmental Planning Supervisor Preservation" Ms. Shirley Marroquin Attn: Stephanie Kramer 201 S. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050 PO Box 48343 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 Olympia, WA 98504-8343 City of Newcastle City of Kent Attn: Mr. Micheal E. Nicholson Attn: Mr. Fred Satterstrom, AICP Director of Community Development Acting Community Dev. Director 13020 SE 72nd Place 220 Fourth Avenue South Newcastle, WA 98059 Kent, W A 98032-5895 Puget Sound Energy City of Tukwila Municipal Liason Manager Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official Joe Jainga 6300 Southcenter Blvd. 201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431 PO Box 90868; MS: XRD-01W Tukwila, WA 98188 Seattle, WA 98104-3856 Bellevue, WA 98009-0868 Seattle Public Utilities Real Estate Services Title Examiner 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 PO Box 34018 Seattle, WA 98124-4018 Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS", the marked agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy of the checklist, PMT's, and the notice of application. " Also note, do not mail Jamey Taylor any of the notices she gets hers from the web. Only send her the ERC Determination paperwork. template -affidavit of service by mailing t ........ ,,""""\\\, , -_... 'f..A,MCf.t. "'I .-_I~ •••••••• '~A " -",.' . 'AA , .: ~ "'<:;\ON c-r.o; .. ". " :~ .. '~ ~". ~ : :!/~ o"'~~RY ~\ ~ "<::0 ~.,611> ~ I~ ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION & PUBLIC HEARING ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION 9F NON-SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED (DNS-M) POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: Parks ide al 95 Burnett Avenue PROJECT NUMBER: LUA04-133, SA,H, ECF, CU-H LOCATION: 77 & 95 Burnett Avenue S DESCRIPTION: The applicant Is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review, Hearing Examiner Site Plan and Hearing Examiner Conditional Use approval tor 8 147,430 sq. ft. multi family residential development. The alta Is 0.83 acres In size and Is relatively flat with no known critical areas. The project would Include 106 dwelling units, Indoor exercise room, common areas and service areas within six building levels Including four residential, and two levels of structured parking of which one level would be below grade. Ten of the multi family units would be townhouse style and front directly onto Burnett Ave. So. The remaining multi family units would be setback from the street. The structured parking garage would Include 181 parking stalls of which 46 would be tandem. The applicant Is requesting a conditional use permit In order to Increase the density above the maximum of the CD zone. The subject property Is located within the Center Downtown (CO) zoning designation, Downtown Core and Urban Center Design Overlay District A. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON 1;HE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the envirOnmental determination must be flied In writing on or before 5:00 PM on December 27, 2004. Appeals must be flied In writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, lOSS South Grady Way. Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section -t.8-110.B. AddItional Information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE 7TH FLOOR OF CITY HALL, 1055 SOUTH GRADY WAY, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON JANUARY 11, 2005 AT 9:00 AM TO CONSIDER THE SITE PLAN AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT. IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED, THE APPEAL WILL BE HEARD AS PART OF THIS PUBLIC HEARING, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT (425) 430-7200_ DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOnCE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION 'Plellse Include the' project ,NUMBER w_hen call1ng.for proper file Identification, CERTIFICATION S :0 tIP' V : Z ~ ~ :. PU'p\..'\ .: 0 : ' , • • fo.... .. ,. A • rIo .. " d\'" \J \ ... § .: " )'-..... 6-2~>'~' .: '",~:,o oii'~ "l-~ ,!Kh:y , here~ttify that 3 copies of the ",,,,",,,,",",,,, aboveument were posted by me in conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on U':teto):)e.r-12q "2-(!Jq . ---/';7; ~~.-uojAEK"? Signed: ~ ~ ATfEST:S~~=..J!.:NOtaryPublic,;~eOf __ _ Washington residing 1 (tJ , on the £17, day 0 "/1 o;::({J6, " U AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON) ) ss. County of King ) Nancy Thompson being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and states: That on the 2ih day of January 2005, affiant deposited via the United States Mail a sealed envelope(s) containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. Signature: ,2005. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Residing at Q....t,rvh",-, therein. Application, Petition or Case No.: Parkside at 95 Burnett File No.: LUA 04-133, SA-H, ECF, CU-H The Decision or Recommendation contains a complete list of the Parties of Record. Minutes APPLICANT: OWNER: LOCATION: SUMMARY OF REQUEST: SUMMARY OF ACTION: OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON Kent Smutny TSA Architects, PLLC 50 1161h Avenue SE, Ste. 201 Bellevue, W A 98004 Parkside at 95 Burnett LLC 2256 381h PI East Seattle, W A 98112 Parks ide at 95 Burnett File No.: LUA 04-133, SA-H, ECF, CU-H 77 and 95 Burnett A venue South January 27, 2005 Approval for a 147,430 square foot multi-family residential development and a Conditional Use Permit to aJlow more than 100 dulac on .83 acres. Development Services Recommendation: Approve with conditions DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REPORT: The Development Services Report was received by the Examiner on January 4, 2005. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Development Services Report, examining available information on file with the application, field checking the property and surrounding area; the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as foHows: MINUTES Thefollowing minutes are a summary of the January 11, 2005 hearing. The legal record is recorded on CD. The hearing opened on Tuesday, January 11, 2005, at 9:59 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of the Renton City Hall. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No.1: Yellow file containing the original Exhibit No.2: Neighborhood Map application, proof of posting, proof of publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No.3: Site Plan Exhibit No.4: Garage Levell Floor Plan Parkside at 95 Burnett File No.: LUA-04-133, SA-H, ECF, CU-H January 27, 2005 Page 2 Exhibit No.5: Garage Level 2 Floor Plan Exhibit No.7: Residential Level 2 Floor Plan Exhibit No.9: East and West Elevations Exhibit No. 11: Building Section A Exhibit No. 13: Landscape Plan -South Exhibit No. 15: Color Board for illustrative purposes Exhibit No.6: Residential Level I Floor Plan Exhibit No.8: Roof Plan Exhibit No. 10: South and North Elevations Exhibit No. 12: Landscape Plan -North Exhibit No. 14: Zoning Map The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by Susan Fiala, Senior Planner, Development Services, City of Renton, 1055 S Grady Way, Renton, Washington 98055. The subject site is comprised of two parcels totaling .83 acres. The site is currently vacant and is located off of Burnett Avenue South, north of South 2nd Street, and west of the subject site is a City park. The property is zoned Center Downtown (CD) and the Comprehensive Land Use Designation of Center Downtown. This previously contained the Lande Feed Company, Northwest Pneumatic Electrical Repair, the Purcell Painting and Canber Corporation all of which have been demolished. The proposal is for a six-story multi family residential building containing 106 dwelling units and 181 structured parking spaces that would be contained within the building, there are no surface parking lots. Four levels of the building would contain the residential component, the two front levels fronting Burnett Avenue South would be ten townhouse dwelling units. In addition to the site plan approval, the applicant is requesting a conditional use permit. The CD zoning district does allow for up to a maximum of 100 dwelling units per acre, with a conditional use permit ISO dwelling units per acre are allowed. The proposal for 106 units on .83 acres of the site would equate to 127 dulac. The Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non-Significance -Mitigated for the project. There were 6 mitigation measures and no appeals were filed. The Conditional Use issue today is density. The subject site is designated Center Downtown (CD) or; the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. The proposal is consistent with the development and redeveh)pment of the CD designation. The site is located within a redeveloping area of the Downtown Core. The site is also within walking distance of the Renton Transit Center. The proposed multi family residential development is intended to serve the surrounding community by providing additional housing opportunities. Attached units are a permitted use in the CD zone. The CD zone allows for a maximum building coverage of 100 percent of the lot. The footprint for the building will cover the majority of the site, 30,179 square feet or 83 percent of the lot. The Examiner questioned as to the city park that would be shaded by this building and that no analysis had been done on that issue, either by the ERC or by the Planning Division. Ms. Fiala stated that the ERC did look at environmental issues, but the issue of shade was not included in this review. The possibility of one less story to the building making less shade does not seem to be harmful to the very young trees that are planted in the park. The Examiner further commented that the concern was not so much for the trees, but the people that might want to enjoy the sunshine in the park. Ms. Fiala stated that the building is only setback two and a half feet from the west property line. The applicant is proposing to do some landscaping in that area to lessen the effect of the , , Parks ide at 95 Burnett File No.: LUA-04-133, SA-H, ECF, CU-I-I January 27, 2005 Page 3 structure. There is some modulation of the building on that side of the site that will help somewhat. There will be no extensions of the building beyond the property line. Based on existing uses within the surrounding area, staff considers the proposal to be compatible with the neigh borhood. The project's consistency with the Site Plan approval criteria based on the comprehensive plan, its elements and policies and find that this sllbject project does comply with all requirements. The CD zone is established to provide for a wide variety of uses including commercial, residential, entertainment and personal/professional services. The CD zone allows multi-family residential uses as primary permitted lIses at densities ranging between 25 and 100 dwelling units per net acre. The proposal is for 127 dwelling per acre with approval of the Conditional Use Permit. The project is located in the Downtown Core area, projects are presently exempt from most development standards including, setbacks, lot coverage and landscaping requirement. The proposed landscaping, plant size, type, and location, is appropriate for the proposed development. The street trees along Burnett Avenue South and the plantings proposed along the nOl1h property line provide a soft edge to the site and transition the building to the surrounding area. The CD zone allows a maximum building height of95 feet. The maximum height of the proposed building at the parapet would be 68 feet 8 inches. One parking space per attached dwelling unit is required. The proposal includes a parking garage that would provide 181 parking stalls. The applicant is proposing tandem spaces which do not count toward the required parking. There would be a total of 46 tandem spaces which would leave a total of 135 parking spa.:es, 29 parking spaces above the required number. The proposed multi family residential use is not expected to aversely impact surrounding properties. The project would add value to the site and further enhance the residential opportunities in the downtown area. The scale, height and bulk of the proposed building are appropriate for the site and would be architecturally compatible with the existing neighborhood. The six-story building steps down on the Burnett A venue South side from four residential stories to two stories of townhouse style units with direct access to the street. All residential levels are modulated with decks. Traffic, Fire and Park Mitigation Fees were imposed by the ERe. Water service and other utilities are available in Burnett Avenue South and would be extended as necessary to the building by the applicant as required by City code. Staff approves the project with one condition. Kent Smutny, TSA Architects, PLLC, 50 1161h Avenue SE, Ste. 201, Bellevue, W A 98004 stated that the proposed density of 127 dulac against the City'S willingness to allow 150 dulac with the use of a Conditional Use Permit, it is evident that the City is willing at looking at projects with higher development where it is appropriate. This project isjust one block north of the Renton Transit Center, the residents of this huilding will be able to walk to that center and reduce some of the traffic in the area. Parkside at 95 Burnett File No.: LUA-04-133, SA-H, ECF, CU-H January 27, 2005 Page 4 Secondly, regarding shade to the park, the site enjoys more sunlight that it has in the past with previous development which shaded a good portion of this park. The new project is 68 feet 8 inches, well below the 95- foot height limit within the zone. On the west side of the building decorative screening is proposed for the openings along the garage wall to add visual interest to the park side. The parking garage doors are 40 feet back from Burnett A venue South, there is room to stack a couple of cars prior to those cars going over the crosswalk. The north wall is a retaining wall that links the sidewalk and pedestrian walk to the park, it is not a visual barrier. The south side of the driveway there is a wall that ends approximately eight feet back from the sidewalk. Mirrors will add a definite help to pedestrians and drivers. The shading on the park will occur during the morning hours. Right now there is no development to the south or the west that would provide further shading, it is basically the morning hours that would affect the park. This park serves as a promenade connecting the downtown to the riverwalk, it will be a pleasant space during most of the day other than early morning hours and the wintertime. David Nielsen, Colpitts Development, 2256 381h Place E, Seattle, W A 98112 stated that the zoning density limits, due to balancing the cost of the construction, site work, rents paid in the area and the ability to get a project built, they all come together and are seeking the increase in density. The number of units with parking works, less density creates a situation where given the shape of the site, they would have to go to a surface parking which would not work as well. The City does allow the increased density subject to the C:mditional Use Permit approval, therefore, the materials choice was above standard for many of the buildings in Renton. Rich Senseney, Colpitts Development, 2256 381h Place E, Seattle, WA 98112 stated that this project stands alone as opposed to being compared to previous projects on the site, however, one benefit of this project is that it is not being built on top of the sewer easement at the northern side of the property. Secondly, even ifone level were to be removed from the building, there could be higher floor to ceilings which would keep the outside height the same. Lastly, the project was pulled back from the park to reduce or eliminate any easements that had been a requirement previously. They are not asking for any open space variances. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 10: 59 am. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATION Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant, Kent Smutny, TSA Architects, filed a request for a Site Plan approval and a Conditional Use Permit for a 106 unit residential building. 2. The yellow file containing the staff report, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit # 1. 3. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the City'S responsible official issued a Determination of Non-Significance -Mitigated (DNS-M). 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. , ". , Parks ide at 95 Burnett File No.: LUA-04-133, SA-H, ECF, CU-H January 27,2005 Page 5 5. The subject site is located at 77 and 95 Burnett A venue South. The subject site is located on the west side of Burnett Avenue and north ofNE 2nd Street. The site was the location of the former Lande Feed Company and is across the street from the old McLendons Hardware Store. 6. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of uses that achieve an urban scale and density, but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the Plan. 7. The subject site is currently zoned CD (Center Downtown). 8. The subject site was pali of the original townsite of the City. 9. The subject site is approximately 0.83 acres or 36,347 square feet. The site is approximately 110 feet deep (east to west) by approximately 324 feet long along Burnett. 10. The subject site, two separate legal lots, is essentially flat. The older structures have been removed and the site is vacant. 11. A City park is located immediately west of the subject site. The old McLendons site is east, across Burnett. There is undeveloped property north of the site and commercial property south of it. A II of the property is zoned CD, the same category as the subject site. 12. The applicant has proposed developing a six-story multiple family residential complex on the subject site. The building's maximum height would be approximately 68 feet. The building would contain approximately 147,430 square feet. The basic configuration would be four levels of residential units above a two-story garage that has one level below ground and one above ground. 13. A group of ten (10) two-story townhomes would be located at street level, setback between 6 and 8 feet from Burnett. These units would have second-story decks and directly access Burnett from private entrances. There would be low brick walls and landscaping separating the units from the sidewalk. The lower units, as well as, the upper units will have modulations and articulations along the facade. The townhomes will have numerous windows. 14. There would be 96 units on the upper 4 levels for a total of 106 dwelling units. These units starting with the third level would be stepped back between 30 and 40 feet behind the two-story townhomes. As noted there will be articulations and modulations in the facade elements. These details will provide a two-foot facade relief at 40-foot intervals. The upper units will also be modulated with decks. 15. The applicant proposes using a variety of colors to provide additional visual relief to the building forms and the separate levels. Besides the color variations, the applicant proposes using a mix of materials to provide fascia, trim and window detail. The garage windows would be finished with decorative metal screenlllg. 16. The complex would have 181 parking stalls. All of the stalls would be located entirely within the garage. Forty-six parking stalls would be tandem in which vehicles would be parked one in front ofthe other. That is 92 vehicles would share these stalls and require maneuvering of one vehicle to gain access to the second vehicle. 17. Primary access to the complex will be provided by two driveways that are located along Burnett near the north and south ends of the building. Access to the garage would be via two separate entrances or Parkside at 95 Burnett File No.: LUA-04-133, SA-H, ECF, CU-H January 27, 2005 Page 6 ramps. The south ramp would provide access to the upper level of the garage while the north ramp would provide access to the lower level. There may be some sight distance problems that could hamper either pedestrian or driver visibility. Staff did suggest that safety measures be employed to protect pedestrians as they pass in front of these driveways. 18. The CD zone permits a density of 100 dwelling units per acre. The approximately 0.83 acre site would permit approximately 83 units. The applicant proposes 106 dwelling units which would yield a density of 127.7 dwelling units per acre. The CD zone permits a density up to 150 dwelling units per acre with a conditional use permit. The applicant has requested a conditional use permit to allow the proposed density of 127.7 units per acre for the subject proposal. 19. The subject site is located within the Renton School District. While there was no discussion of the potential for students living in this urban complex, a general rule is that multiple family complexes generate approximately 0.33 students per unit. The project could be anticipated to generate approximately 30 school age children. These students would be spread across the grades and would be assigned on a space available basis. 20. The development will increase traffic by approximately 292 net trips. Approximately ten percent of the trips, will be generated in the morning and evening rush hours. 2 I. The subject site is served by City sewer and water. The urban downtown has storm water systems. 22. A study was conducted to analyze the impacts of the proposed building on the trees located in the park west of the subject site. It generally concluded that the trees would adapt to changes in light. There was no analysis of the effects shading and shadows would have on the use of the park. CONCLUSIONS: Conditional Use Permit I. The applicant's request for a Conditional Use Permit must demonstrate that the use is in the public interest, will not impair the health, safety or welfare of the general public and is in compliance with the criteria found in Section 4-9-030 which provides in part that: a. The proposal generally conforms to the Comprehensive Plan; b. There is a general community need for the proposed use at the proposed location; c. There will be no undue impacts on adjacent property; d. The proposed use is compatible in scale with the adjacent residential uses, if any; e. Parking,. unless otherwise permitted, will not occur in the required yards; f. Traffic and pedestrian circulation will be safe and adequate for the proposed project; g. Noise, light and glare will not cause an adverse affect on neighboring property; h. Landscaping shall be sufficient to buffer the use from rights-of-way and neighboring property where appropriate; and Parkside at 95 Burnett File No.: LUA-04-133, SA-H, ECF, CU-H January 27, 2005 Page 7 I. Adequate public services are available to serve the proposal. The requested conditional use appears justified although there will be shading impacts on the adjacent park . . 2. The Comprehensive Plan suggests that this area of downtown Renton is suitable for urban scale and urban density uses. The proposal seeks to achieve both objectives. It will be occupying most of its lot and, at a proposed six-stories, will be equal to the taller buildings that recently have been added to the Renton "skyline" or are planned to be added. It will accommodate a new urban population that is anticipated to bring more vitality to the downtown area and its retail core. 3. Whether the proposed use is needed is quite subjective. That is, a slightly smaller or lower building could be constructed without the need for a Conditional Use Permit. A one-story reduction in height would probably allow the building to be erected without the need for a permit. That might also lessen the impacts on the adjacent park to its west. At the same time, there is an economy of scale and more residents should increase the urban feel of the area. In addition, code permits buildings up to 95 feet and this building at 68 feet would be approximately 30 feet shorter than the maximum permitted. 4. The new building will clearly be taller than most of the structures north ofNE 2nd Street. But a new, taller building will be erected on the old McLendon's site to the east and a new parking garage and other buildings are being constructed to the south. It will affect the adjacent park. There will be additional shading and shadows particularly in the morning. 5. The use may not be fully compatible at the moment with some surrounding uses but it is compatible with both the goals of the Comprehensive Plan as well as the limits of the Zoning Code. 6. All parking for the building will be in interior lots. There will be no unsightly surface parking. 7. Traffic will be limited to two driveways but those will cross a sidewalk that provides access to surrounding uses and the Cedar River north of the site. Staff has recommended warning devices or other safety measures be employed to minimize the potential for pedestrian and vehicle conflicts at those driveways. In addition, the plans should be carefully refined to make sure that adequate sight distance is provided for both pedestrians and vehicles at the driveway-sidewalk crossings. If necessary, walls and/or landscaping or other elements of the plan should be altered to provide more measures of safety. 8. Construction noise will intrude for a while but will eventually end. There will be more urban hubbub associated with the use but that was anticipated. The new building will probably also mean more ambient I ight in the evenings. 9. The building will be taking up most of the lot leaving limited on-site opportunities for much landscaping. The project will have landscaping along its eastern facade adjacent to or as part of the townhome amenities. There will also be a landscaped path area along the north side of the building. Streettrees along Burnett should help soften the overall appearance of the project. 10. The site is in the City's urban core and utilities are available to serve the site. 11. The increase in density is not very substantial and is permitted by the Zoning Code with appropriate review. In addition, the zone permits buildings up to 95 feet tall and this building is approximately one- Parks ide at 95 Burnett File No.: LUA-04-133, SA-H, ECF, CU-H January 27,2005 Page 8 third shorter than that maximum. Is the increased height necessary, probably not, but it is not unduly injurious to the neighborhood or community. Site Plan 12. The site plan ordinance provides a number of specific criteria for reviewing a site plan. Those criteria are generally represented in part by the following enumerations: a. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; b. Conformance with the Building and Zoning Codes; c. Mitigation of impacts on surrounding properties and uses; d. Mitigation of impacts ofthe proposal on the subject site itself; e. Conservation of property val ues; f. Provision for safe and efficient vehicle and pedestrian circulation; g. Provision of adequate light and air; h. Adequacy of public services to accommodate the proposed use; The proposed use satisfies these and other particulars of the ordinance. 13. Some of the criteria mirror those for a conditional use review. The proposal is compatible with the Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Code. Compliance with building and fire codes will be determined when building permit applications are submitted. 14. Again, the project will be the first larger complex proposed for north of 2nd Street and will have some impacts on the adjacent properties, particularly the adjacent park. The impacts should not be profound. 15. The redevelopment ofthe subject site should help property values and will increase the tax base of the City. 16. With measures to protect pedestrians near the driveways, the building appears to have made adequate provision for traffic and pedestrians. 17. Given the area, the goals and the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan, and the height and bulk limitations in the Zoning Code the proposed use is appropriate. DECISION: The Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan are approved subject to the following conditions: I. The applicant shall comply with the conditions imposed by the ERe. 2. The installation of mirrors, warning devices or other safety equipment at both driveways/garage ramps shall be incorporated into the final building design and completed prior to the issuance of the certificate , , Parkside at 95 Burnett File No.: LUA-04-J33, SA-H, ECF, CU-H' January 27,2005 Page 9 2. The installation of mirrors, warning devices or other safety equipment at both driveways/garage ramps shall be incorporated into the final building design and completed prior to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy. The satisfaction of this requirement is subject to the review and approval of the. Development Services Project Manager at the ~ime of building permit review. 3. The plans shall be carefully refined to make sure that adequate sight distance is provided for both pedestrians and vehicles at the driveway-sidewalk crossings. If necessary, walls and/or landscaping or other elements of the plan should be altered to provide more measures of safety. ORDERED THIS 27lh day of January 2005. FRED J. KAUF HEARING EX TRANSMITTED THIS 271h day of January 2005 to the parties of record: Susan Fiala 1055 S Grady Way Renton, W A 98055 Kent Smutny TSA Architects, PLLC 50 1161h Ave. SE, Ste. 201 Bellevue, W A 98004 Parkside at 95 Burnett LLC 2256 381h PI. E Seattle, W A 98112 David Nielsen Colpitts Development 2256 381h PI. E Seattle, W A 98112 TRANSMITTED THIS 27lh day of January 2005 to the following: Mayor Kathy Keolker-Wheeler Stan Engler, Fire Kayren Kittrick Development Services Div. Renton, W A 98056 Rich Senseney Colpitts Development 2256 381h PI. E Seattle, W A 98112 Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer Julia Medzegian, Council Liaison Larry Warren, City Attorney Larry Meckling, Building Official Planning Commission Transportation Division Gregg Zimmerman, PBPW Administrator Alex Pietsch, Economic Development Jennifer Henning, Development Services Stacy Tucker, Development Services Utilities Division Neil Watts, Development Services Janet Conklin, Development Services King County Journal Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 1 OOGof the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m., February 10,2005. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date ofthe Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. Parkside at 95 Burnett File No.: LUA-04-133, SA-H, ECF, CU-H January 27,2005 Page 10 An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 110, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of$75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. An appeal must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m., February 10,2005. If the Examiner's Recommendation or Decision contains the requirement for Restrictive Covenants, the executed Covenants will be required prior to approval by City Councilor final processing of the file. You may contact this office for information on formatting covenants. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the COUI L The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. , EXHIBIT 2 f' 4 _.u. ___ _ " I" . ". ": .: ..... u.. '.' ~ IJ "lJ,,~~ · ; . '. '. , .. ' .. ' , ~"a!Yp-~;;uI"MJ? --~-.--~-. 0 /;1 __ B~e:~U~804!:~:~ __ -. _ _ :& '''''''-1 I ---""" -- -r~/Utlili' l L __ -------I a ~ .. ~ 6 /,,44' ........ _ ...... • CON)IIQ ............. ~I, ro ",: "" o e .·.-.·.·.'.·.1···.·.·.·.···(:.·.11.·.···.·.·.·.·.(. ... · ~::~~'~'l· ~.:.~~~A~i:Lg?J:: ~ . , PROPOSED BUILDINQ ~ r· .. t····'l r· .. ·\ r"'u~ r····\ -.................................... __ . __ .-... . ill MI/',k'I'fft hi 8URHm pUCE SOUTK ®SITEPLAN r····1 r····' " m,II' .. · .... ·1\ I \ -..... n I _.""':~"" .. " ............... ! ~ I~II ~ I" 1-II __ .~ Parkslde at 95 Burnett _I TSJ.f,ji/"II.I-UA .. , ... Ao.-u._JIJ -.-"A ... =--- M f-ro ~ I ~II ~U 6 1181HX3 t: G) uj E :::J CD m ::J 10 c CD 0) ~ -as :t:: ..lI:: G) CD ~ "U C as 0; ... ::J a ..lI:: m I z ~ I as z 0 a. 0 !;( ~ ~ > 8 W I W ..J~ ..J W~ w t-i. t-(J)lt J (J) Wi e( 3:1 W STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING} AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION PUBLIC NOTICE Lori Tedder, being first duly sworn on oath that she is a Legal Advertising Representative of the King County Journal a daily newspaper, which newspaper is a legal newspaper of general circulation and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continuously as a daily newspaper in King County, Washington. The King County Journal has been approved as a Legal Newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. The notice in the exact form annexed was published in regular issues of the King County Journal (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a Public Notice was published on Monday, 12113/04 The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $114.50 at the rate of$15.50 per inch for the first publication and NIA per ~=equent ;"5Ortion. ~e'~---. ori Ted er . Legal Advertising Representative, King County Journal Subscribed andffiVOrn to me this 14th day of December, 2004. Tom A. Meagher Notary Public for the State of Washington, Residing in Redmond, Washington Ad Number: 847763 P.O. Number: Cost of publishing this notice includes an affidavit surcharge. \\\\1 I \ III 1/ 111// ~,,\\ \>-. MEA IIIII/. ~~~" ......... G,y ~ "" O~~ •• , \ ' •. ~ /. ~ "~99 on E'..r " ''1> ~ 2: " .. ' ~~ to,;.·... ~ -... • 0 TA GI • -:::. :::: f()~O Ry"'\ ~ = : -8-: --: .~-~~\ ,oUBL\V .log ~". ~.",:::. ~ /-. •••• 4f~ y 'loOo ••• ·" ~ ,.~ .t>.'. 2, .' oS ~ ~ ,~ 0 ......... ~\~ ~ "III/ F W/lt.S ,\\~ 1//" 11/111 \ \1"\\\ NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE & PUBLIC HEARING RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee has issued a Determination of Non-Significance- Mitigated for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. Parkside at 95 Burnett Avenue LUA04-133, SA-H, ECF, CU-H Location: 77 & 95 Burnett Avenue S. The applicant is requesting approval for a 147,430 sq. ft. multi family residential development. The site is 0.83 acres in size and would include 106 dwelling units within six building levels includ- ing four residential, and two lev- els of structured parking. Ten of the multi family units would be townhouse style and front directly onto Burnett Ave. So. The struc- tured parking garage would include 181 parking stalls. The applicant is requesting a con- ditional use permit in order to increase the density above the maximum of the CD zone. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writ- ing on or before 5:00 PM on December 27, 2004. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner in the Council Chambers, City Hall, on January 11, 2005 at 9:00 AM to con- sider the Site· Plan and Conditional Use Permit. If the Environmental Determination is appealed, the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. Interested parties are invited to attend the public hearing. Published in the King County Journal December 13, 2004. #847763 ... ir --L KathyKeoUter~Wheeler, Mayor. Janu8:ry6,2005 : -- . Kent Smutny· .' TSA Architects,PLLC 50 116th Avenue SE . Bellevue. WA98Q04 . SUBJECT: Parkside at 95 Burnett . LuA-04-133 SA-H· ECF CtJ-H . ,. , ," .. ," .' , Dear Mr. Smutny: Il : , CITY )F RENTON . . . Plannin!ifBuildinglPublic WorkS Departmerit Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator . Thislette~ is to inform yowthat the'appealperiodhasendedf~r.the Environmental Review Comniittee's(ERC) Determination of Non-Significiu:l(:e -Mitigat~d for the above-referenced .' project. ". -' .. '. , ... ::::,' ... -' No appeals were filed on the ERC determjrlatiO,,: ... This deCision is final and application ,tor the ~ppropri~tely required-:permits may' proceed. The applicantiTlust comply with; all ERCMitigation Measures. A Hearing Examiner Public Hearing has been scheduled for January t1, 2005,whe;re Site Pian Conditions may be issued. . . ·If you have any questions, pleasefeelJree t6contact'me at (425) 430-7382 . . ' :. .... : .,' ," . For the Environmental Review Committee, Susan Fiala Senior Planner. cc: Parkside at 95 Burnett LLG / Owner ..' Robert T, Cooper~ Donald C. Erue, Mary Brown, Bruce & Cathy Pope / Parties of Record ~ . 'Iu~ ------I-O-55-S:-o-u--:-th....,...G=-r~ad-:-y-W.-a-Cy---::R-en-t-on-.---w.,-a-sh~in-g-to-n-' 9-8-0-55-'--~-----~ . * This paper contains 50% recycled material, 30% post consumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE . . . CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER 'PUBLIC HEARING 'January 11 ,2005 AGENDA COMMEt.JCING AT9:00 AM,. . .., . ,·ddUNCIl":CI-IAMBERS,7THFl;()OR, RENTON CITY HALL The:application(s) listed are in orde(ofapplication number only and not necessarily the order in which they will be 'heard. Items will be. called for hearing at the discretion of the Hearing Examiner. . PROJECT NAME: Parkside at 95 Burnett PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-05-133, SA-H, ECF, CU-H PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Hearing Examiner Site Plan approval for a 147,430 sq. ft. multi family residential development. In addition, the applicant seeks approval of a Conditional Use Permit in order to exceed 100 dulac. The proposal would result in 127.7 dulac. The site is 0.83 acres in size and is relatively flat with no known critical areas. The project would include 106 dwelling units, indoor exercise room, common areas and service areas within six building levels including four residential, and two levels of structured parking of which one level would be below grade. Ten of the multi family units would be townhouse style and front directly onto Burnett Ave. So. The remaining multi family units would be setback from the street. The structured parking garage would include 181 parking stalls of which 46 would be tandem. The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit in order to increase the density above the maximum of the CD zone. The subject property is located within the Center Downtown (CD) zoning designation, Downtown Core and Urban Center Design Overlay District A. ' HEX Agenda01-11-05.doc City of Renton PUBLIC HEARING Department of Planning / Building / Public Works PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: Public Hearing Date: January 11, 2005 Project Name: Parks ide at 95 Burnett Owner:: Parkside at 95 Burnett LLC 2256 38th PL E. Seattle, WA 98112 Applicant: Kent Smutny, TSA Architects, PLLC 50 116th Ave. SE, Ste. 201 Bellevue, WA 98004 File Number: LUA-04-133, SA-H, ECF, CU-H Planner: Susan A. Fiala Project Description: The applicant is requesting Hearing Examiner Site Plan approval for a 147,430 sq. ft. multi family residential development. In addition, the applicant seeks approval of a Conditional Use Permit in order to exceed 100 dulac. The proposal would result in 127.7 dulac. The site is 0.83 acres in size and is relatively flat with no known critical areas. The project would include 106 dwelling units, indoor exercise room, common areas and service areas within six building levels including four residential, and two levels of structured parking of which one level would be below grade. Ten of the multi family units would be townhouse style and front directly onto Burnett Ave. So. The remaining multi family units would be setback from the street. The structured parking garage would include 181 parking stalls of which 46 would be tandem. The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit in order to increase the density above the maximum of the CD zone. The subject property is located within the Center Downtown (CD) zoning designation, Downtown Core and Urban Center Design Overlay District A. Project Location: 77 and 95 Burnett Avenue South .' . .' 0,:', ... ' City of Renton PIBIPW Department PARKS/DE AT 95 BURNETT • Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner LUA-04-133, SA-H, ECF, CU-H PUBLIC HEARING DATE: January 11.2005 Page 2 of 13 B. EXHIBITS The following exhibits are entered into the record: Exhibit NO.1: Yellow file containing: application, proof of posting and publication, environmental review and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit NO.2: Neighborhood Map (dated Oct. 26, 2004). Exhibit NO.3: Sheet A1.0, Site Plan (dated Dec. 17,2004). Exhibit No.4: Sheet A 2.1, Garage Level 1 Floor Plan (dated Oct. 26, 2004). Exhibit No.5: Sheet A 2.2, Garage Level 2 Floor Plan (dated Oct. 26, 2004). Exhibit NO.6: Sheet A 2.3, Residential Level 1 Floor Plan (dated Dec. 17,2004). Exhibit NO.7: Sheet A 2.4, Residential Level 2 Floor Plan [Levels 3 and 4 similar] (dated Dec. 17, 2004) .. Exhibit NO.8: Sheet A 2.7, Roof Plan (dated Dec. 17,2004). Exhibit NO.9: Sheet A 5.1, East and West Elevations (dated Dec. 17,2004). Exhibit No. 10: Sheet A 5.2, South and North Elevations (dated Dec. 17,2004). Exhibit No. 11: Sheet A 6.1, Building Section A (dated Oct. 26, 2004). Exhibit No. 12: Sheet L-1.0, Landscape Plan -North (dated Dec. 17,2004). Exhibit No. 13: Sheet L-1.1, Landscape Plan -South (dated Dec. 17, 2004). Exhibit No. 14: Zoning Map F 3-East (dated Dec. 4,2003). c. GENERAL INFORM A TION: 1. 2. 3. 4. Owner of Record: Zoning D((Jsignation: Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation: Existing Site Use: 5. Neighborhood Characteristics 6. 7. B. North: East: South: West: Access: Site Area: Project Data: Existing Building Area: New Building Area: Total Building Area: HEX_Parkside95Burnett.doc Parkside at 95 Burnett LLC 2256 38th PL E. Seattle, WA 98112 Center Downtown (CD) Center Downtown (CD) Vacant Undeveloped parcels -zoned Center Downtown (CD) Proposed Merrill Gardens Senior Housing Development -zoned Center Downtown (CD) zoned Center Downtown (CD) City Park and trail-zoned Center Downtown (CD) Burnett Avenue South 36,347-sf (0.83 acres) Area N/A 147 ,430-sq. ft. 147 ,430-sq. ft. comments N/A N/A N/A City of Renton PIB/PW Department PARKS/DE AT 95 BURNETT -Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner LUA-04-133, SA-H, ECF, CU-H PUBLIC HEARING DATE: January 11, 2005 D. HISTORICAUBACKGROUND: Action Zoning Comprehensive Plan Original City of Renton Plat Land Use File No. NIA NIA NIA Ordinance No. 4404 4498 NIA Page 3 of 13 Date 06/07193 02/20/95 1901 E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (RMC TITLE IV): 1. Chapter 2 Land Use Districts Section 4-2-020: Purpose and Intent of Zoning Districts Section 4-2-070: Zoning Use Table Section 4-2-120.B: Commercial Development Standards 2. Chapter 3 Environmental Regulations and Special Districts Section 4-3-100: Urban Center Design Overlay Regulations 3. Chapter 4 Property Development Standards Section 4-4-030: Development Guidelines and Regulations -General Section 4-4-070: Landscaping Regulations Section 4-4-080: Parking, Loading, and Driveway Regulations Section 4-4-090: Refuse and Recyclables Standards 4. Chapter 6 Streets and Utility Standards 5. Chapter 9 Procedures and Review Criteria Section 4-9-030: Conditional Use Permits Section 4-9-200: Site Plan Review 6. Chapter 11 Definitions F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: 1. Land Use Element 2. Environmental Element 3. Downtown Element 4. Economic Development 5. Housing Element G. DEPARTMENT ANAL YSIS: 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND The 0.83 acre site, comprised of two parcels, is vacant. Previously the site contained the Lande Feed Company, Northwest Pneumatic Electrical Repair and the Purcell Painting and Canber Corp. all of which have been demolished. The site is located on the west side of Burnett Avenue South and north of South 2nd Street. The six story multi family residential building would contain 106 dwelling units and 181 structured parking spaces. Four levels of the building would contain the residential component and two levels would contain the parking stalls, one level of parking would be below grade. Ten of the dwelling units would be townhouse type units fronting Burnett Ave. So. The remaining 96 units contained within the top four levels, would be setback from the street. These four residential levels would contain 24 dwelling units per floor. The type of apartments proposed include studios, one, two and three bedroom units. A central core of elevators and stairs at the ends of the building would provide internal HEX_Parkside95Burnett.doc City of Renton PIBIPW Department PARKS/DE AT 95 BURNETT ~, \ PUBLIC HEARING DATE: January 11, 2005 Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner LUA-04-133, SA-H, ECF, CU-H Page 4 of 13 access to each level. The structure would be 68 feet 8 inches at its highest point. A portion of the lower parking level would be below grade. The two level parking garage would be accessed from Burnett Ave. South. Each parking level would have a separate entry located at the far north and south ends of the building's frontage along Burnett Ave. South. Garage Level 1 would be accessed from the northeast corner of the building via Burnett Ave. So. utilizing a 20-foot wide ramp down. The level would include 89 parking stalls total of which 22 would be tandem spaces. Garage Level 2 would include 92 parking stalls with 24 tandem stalls and be accessed from the southeast corner of the building with a ramp up to this level. The site is located in the Center Downtown (CD) zoning designation which permits a maximum density up to 100 dwelling units per acre and with approval of a conditional use permit up to 150 dulac would be permitted. The proposed density would be 127.7 dulac which is greater than the maximum allowed and thus requires a conditional use permit. The site is also within the Downtown Core and Urban Design Overlay District A. 2. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.21 C, 1971 as amended), on December 7,2004 the Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non-Significance, Mitigated for the project. The DNS-M included six mitigation measures. A 14-day appeal period commenced on December 13,2004 and ended on December 27, 2004. No appeals of the threshold determination were filed. 3. ERe MITIGATION MEASURES Based on an analysis of probable impacts from the proposed project, the following mitigation measures were issued for the Determination of Non-Significance -Mitigated: 1. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations contained in the Geotechnical Engineering Study, dated September 29, 2004, regarding "Seismic Considerations" and "General Earthwork and Structural Fill': The satisfaction of this requirement shall be reviewed and approved by Development Services during construction, utility work and building construction. 2. The project shall be required to be designed and comply with the Department of Ecology's (DOE) Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements, outlined in Volume 1/ of the 2001 Storm water Management Manual. 3. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee based on a rate of $388.00 per multi family unit. The fee shall be at the time of building permit issuance. 4. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Transportation Mitigation Fee based on 292 new (net) trips at $75.00 per each new average daily trip associated with the project. The fee shall be paid at the time of building permit issuance. 5. In the event that archaeological deposits are found during construction, work shall stop and the contractor(s) shall contact the State Archaeologist at the State of Washington Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, phone (360) 586-3065. 6. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Parks Mitigation Fee based on $354.51 per new unit. The fee is to be paid at the time of building permit issuance. 4. STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS Representatives from various city departments have reviewed the application materials to identify and address site plan issues from the proposed development. These comments are contained in the official file, and the essence of the comments has been incorporated into the appropriate sections of this report and the Departmental Recommendation at the end of the report. H EX_Parkside95Burnett.doc ( \ City of Renton PIB/PW Department, , ' -PARKS/DE AT 95 BURNETT __ , Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner LUA-04-133, SA-H, ECF, CU-H PUBLIC HEARING DATE January 11,2005 Page 5 of 13 5. CONSISTENCY WITH CONDITIONAL USE CRITERIA: Section 4-9-030.G lists 11 criteria that the Hearing Examiner is asked to consider, along with all other relevant information, in making a decision on a Conditional Use application. These include the following: ' (1) CONSISTENCY WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, ZONING CODE & OTHER ORDINANCES: HEX_Parkside95Bumett.doc The proposed use shall be compatible with the general purpose, goals, objectives and standard of the Comprehensive Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and any other plan, program, map or ordinance of the City of Renton. (a) Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element The subject site is designated Center Downtown (CD) on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. The intent of the "Center" designation is to create a balance of land uses which contribute to the revitalization of downtown Renton and to reinforce downtown Renton as the regional commercial district in the City. (Objectives DT-A and DT-B) As such, the proposal to increase the density to 127.7 dulac is consistent with the policies established by the City's Comprehensive Plan. Policy DT-3. Development and redevelopment of Center Downtown should strive for urban density and intensity of uses. The higher density of the proposal addresses the policy for intensity of uses in the downtown area. The proposed density is 127.7 dulac. Policy H-91. Identify sites which may be suitable for housing redevelopment in the downtown. The subject site is located within a redeveloping area of the Downtown Core. To. the east is a proposal for a senior housing project consisting of 155 units, Merrill Gardens. To the north of the site, adjacent to the Cedar River is "55 Williams" which contains 37 units (owner-occupied condominiums). The site is within walking distance of the Renton Transit Center. The proposal would be located in a "core" area of housing redevelopment projects and would provide another housing type to the area. (b) Zoning Code The proposed use is located within the Center Downtown (CD) zoning designation. The proposed facility building is an outright permitted use in the CD zone. However, the proposed density of the development would exceed the outright permitted maximum density of 100 dulac of the zone. The density may be increased up to 150 dulac if the conditional use permit is approved. The applicant is requesting approval of a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit to increase the density to 127.7 dulac (106 units 10.83 acres = 127.7 dulac). (c) Development Standards The proposed multi family residential development has been designed to meet the development standards established in the CD zone except for the permitted density. However, The CD zone does allow a density increase up to 150 dul ac subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit. To meet the maximum allowed density, 83 dwelling units would be permitted. This would be a reduction of 23 units, which is essentially one entire floor of units. The additional 23 units for a total of 106 units on the 0.83 acre site results in a net density of 127.7 dulac which is below the maximum permitted with a Conditional Use Permit. The maximum of 150.0 dulac on this site would allow up to 124 dwelling units. . ( , City of Renton PIBIPW Department ,-,' PARKS/DE AT 95 BURNETT Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner LUA-04-133, SA-H, ECF, CU-H PUBLIC HEARING DA TE: January 11, 2005 Page 60f13 (2) COMMUNITY NEED: (3) There shall be a community need for the proposed use at the proposed location. In the determination of community need, the Hearing Examiner shall consider the following factors, among all other relevant information: (a) The proposed location shall not result in either the detrimental over concentration of a particular use within the City or within the immediate area of the proposed use. The proposed multi family residential development is intended to serve the surrounding community by providing additional housing opportunities. Attached units are an outright permitted use in the CD zone. The subject request is for additional density which may be increased with approval of this requested Conditional Use Permit. (b) That the proposed location is suited for the proposed use. Attached units are an outright permitted use in the CD zone. The subject request is for additional density which may be increased with approval of this requested Conditional Use Permit. EFFECT ON ADJACENT PROPERTIES: The proposed use at the proposed location shall not result in SUbstantial or undue adverse effects on adjacent property. The following site requirements shall be required: (a) Lot Coverage: Lot coverage shall conform to the requirements of zone in which the proposed use is to be located. The subject site is located within the Downtown Core. Projects located within this area are exempt from most development standards of the CD zone including; setbacks, lot coverage and landscape requirements. The CD zone allows for a maximum building coverage of 100 percent of the lot. The footprint for the building will cover the majority of the site. The total building footprint is proposed to be 30,179 square feet. This generates a total building coverage of 83 percent (22,621 sq. ft.-garage + 7,558 lower level residential footprint I 36,347 total site square feet = 95 percent). (b) Yards: Yards shall conform to the requirements of the zone in which the proposed use is to be located. Additions to the structure shall not be allowed in any required yard. The subject site is located within the Downtown Core. Projects located within this area are exempt from most development standards of the CD zone including; setbacks, lot coverage and landscape requirements. (c) Height: Bui/ding and structure heights shall conform to the requirements of the zone in which the proposed use is to be located. Spires, bell towers, public utility antennas or similar structure may exceed the height requirement upon approval of a variance. Building heights should be related to surrounding used in order to allow optimal sunlight and ventilation, and minimal obstruction of views from adjacent structures. The CD zone establishes a maximum building height of 95 feet for development located within this zone. The proposed structure has been designed with an overall height of 68 feet and 8 inches, which is well below the maximum height permitted in the CD zorie. (4) COMPATIBILITY: HEX_Parkside95Burnetl.doc The subject property is located within a predominantly residential area including established single family and newer and proposed multi family developments. An existing owner-occupied development is the 55 Williams projects located to the north of this project. To the east and slightly south is the proposed Merrill Garden Senior housing project of 155 units, which was recently approved (LUA 04-070). Based on existing uses within the surrounding area, staff considers the proposal to be compatible with the neighborhood. City of Renton PIBIPW Department PARKS/DE AT 95 BURNETT PreliminarY Report to the Hearing Examiner LUA-04-133, SA-H, ECF, CU-H PUBLIC HEARING DATE: January 11, 2005 Page 7 of 13 (5) PARKING: Parking under the building structure should be encouraged. Lot coverage may be increased to as much as seventy-five percent (75%) of the lot coverage requirement of the zone, in which the proposed use is located, if all parking is provided underground or within the structure. All parking would be located within the lower two levels of the structure. The two levels would include 181 parking spaces. The additional density would require parking that would be accommodated within the structure. (6) TRAFFIC: Traffic and circulation patterns of vehicles and pedestrians relating to the proposed use and surrounding area shall be reviewed for potential effects on, and to ensure safe movement in the surrounding area. The request for a conditional use permit is due to the increased density. Please see discussion regarding traffic within the site plan review section of this report. (7) NOISE, GLARE: Potential noise, light and glare impacts shall be evaluated based on the location of the proposed use on the lot and the location of on-site parking areas, outdoor recreational areas and refuse storage areas. The request for a conditional use permit is due to the increased density. Please see discussion regarding noise and glare within the site plan review section of this report. (8) LANDSCAPING: Landscaping shall be provided in all areas not occupied by building or paving. The Hearing Examiner may require additional landscaping to buffer adjacent properties from potentially adverse effects of the proposed use. The request for a conditional use permit is due to the increased density. Please see discussion regarding landscaping within the site plan review section of this report. (9) ACCESSORY USES: Accessol}' uses to conditional uses such as day schools, auditoriums used for social and sport activities, health centers, convents, preschool facilities, convalescent homes and others of a similar nature shall be considered to be separate uses and shall be subject to the provisions of the use district in which they are located. There are no accessory uses included with the proposal. (10) CONVERSION: No existing building or structure shall be converted to a conditional use unless such building or structure complies, or is brought into compliance, with the provisions of this Chapter. The subject site is currently undeveloped; therefore, the conversion of existing buildings is not included with the proposal. (11) PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS: HEX_Parkside958urnett.doc The proposed use and location shall be adequately served by and not impose an undue burden on any public improvements, facilities, utilities, and services. Approval of a conditional use permit may be conditional upon the provision and/or guarantee by the applicant of necessal}' public improvements, facilities, utilities, and/or services. Please see discussion regarding public improvements within the site plan review section of this report. City of Reriton PIBIPW Department ' PARKS/DE AT 95 BURNETT Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner LUA-04-133, SA-H, ECF, CU-H PUBLIC HEARING DA TE: January 11, 2005 Page 8 of 13 6. CONSISTENCY WITH SITE PLAN APPROVAL CRITERIA As per RMC 4-9-200.E, "The Reviewing Official shall review and act upon site plans based upon comprehensive planning considerations and the following criteria. These criteria are objectives of good site plans to be aimed for in development within the City of Renton. However, strict compliance with any one or more particular criterion may not be necessary or reasonable. These criteria also provide a frame of reference for the applicant in developing a site, but are not intended to be inflexible standards or to discourage creativity and innovation. The site plan review criteria include, but are not limited to, the following": (A) CONFORMANCE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, ITS ELEMENTS & POLICIES The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designation for the project property is Center Downtown (CD). The intent of the "Center" designation is to create a balance of land uses which contribute to the revitalization of downtown Renton and to reinforce downtown Renton as the regional commercial district in the City. (Objectives DT-A and DT-B) The following Comprehensive Plan policies are applicable to the proposal: Policy DT-1. There should be a mix of uses, including retail, office, light industrial and residential, which generate the demand for goods and services. Parkside at 95 Burnett is proposed as a multi-family residential development. Future occupants will generate a demand for goods and services lending to the redevelopment of the Downtown· Core. Policy DT-3. Development and redevelopment of Center Downtown should strive for urban density and intensity of uses. The higher density of the proposal addresses the policy for intensity of uses in the downtown area. Policy DT-24. Net residential development densities in the downtown area should achieve a range of 25-100 dwelling units per acre. The project's 106 dwelling units achieves a net density of 127.7 dwelling units per acre, which will help the City meet its obligation under the growth targets mandated by the Growth Management Act (GMA) for the downtown core area. A Conditional Use Permit has been requested with the application in order to exceed the 25 to 100 dulac range. Policy DT-5. Redevelopment of the downtown area should be encouraged to maintain and revitalize the downtown core. The proposed use will provide a more intensive use of a vacant site and create additional housing op portu n ities. Policy LU-17. Larger multi-family development projects are encouraged in the downtown area, the Center Office Residential and the Multi-family Residential-Infill designations. The proposal is a large-scale multi family housing development consisting of a six story building with 106 dwelling units. Policy H-7. Promote high quality residential living environments in all types of neighborhoods. The proposed multi family development is designed as an urban scale project located within the Downtown Core of Renton. The proposal would include both townhouse style units as well as stacked flats with two levels of structured parking. Site amenities include interior exercise areas, meeting rooms and an exterior courtyard located above the two lower levels of townhouse units. Policy H-B. Encourage distribution of diverse housing types and unit sizes throughout the city. The project provides for a large scale (106 units) mutli family development of studios, one and tow bedroom units located in the Downtown Core and which would provide for high quality residential environment for the community. HEX_Parkside95Burnettdoc City of Renton PIBIPW Department ", PARKS/DE AT 95 BURNETT PUBLIC HEARING DATE: January 11, 2005 , Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner LUA-04-133, SA-H, ECI=. CU-H Page 9 of 13 Policy ED-3. Lands with adequate existing infrastructure should be given priority for development. The subject site has adequate infrastructure in place and has been an area of redevelopment focus for the City. Policy EN-1. Prevent development on lands where development would create hazards to life, property or environmental quality. The subject site does not contain any environmentally sensitive areas and when developed, would not create any adverse environmental impacts. Policy LU-112. Minimize the percentage of land devoted to surface parking by encouraging shared parking and development of parking structures The project would provide 181 structured parking stalls located within the lower two levels of the structure. (B) CONFORMANCE WITH LAND USE REGULATIONS The subject site is zoned Center Downtown (CD). The CD zone is established to provide for a wide variety of uses including commercial, residential, entertainment and personal/professional services. The CD zone allows multi-family retirement residential uses as primary permitted uses at densities ranging between 25 and 100 dwelling units per net acre. The proposed project includes 106 multi family dwelling units on an 36,347 square foot site (0.83 acres), resulting in a net density of 127.7 dwelling units per net acre permitted with approval of a Conditional Use Permit. It should also be noted that the proposed development promotes the goals and policies of the City's Economic Development priorities for the City's Downtown area. Development Standards The subject site is located in the "Downtown Core Area." Projects within the Downtown Core Area are presently exempt from most development standards of the CD zone; including parking requirements, setbacks, lot coverage and landscape requirements. Lot Coverage -The footprint for the building will cover the majority of the site. The total building footprint is proposed to be 30,179 square feet. This generates a total building coverage of 83 percent (22,621 sq. ft.-garage + 7,558 lower level residential footprint / 36,347 total site square feet = 95 percent). Setbacks / Landscaping -No minimum setbacks or landscape requirements are applied to CD zoned properties in the Downtown Core Area. There is no maximum front yard setback for buildings over 25 ft. in height. There is no required rear yard as the property abuts commercially zoned property to the west (park land) which is the rear yard. The proposed townhouse units which front on Burnett Avenue South would be setback from 6 to 8 feet. The four story section of the building is setback from the townhouse units from 30 to 40 feet to reduce the impact of the height of the building and provide a transition to the street level. The setback area along Burnett Avenue South would include the individual entries to the ten townhouse units along with individually landscaped courtyard areas containing a smaller variety of plantings, which would effectively transition the street to the building's falfade. Within the planting strip abutting the street would be Autumn Purple Ash and Aristocrat Pear trees. All landscaping is required to be fully irrigated. The proposal also includes a deck on the second floor. The deck would include small and larger sized planters with container plants including: Kousa Dogwood, maples, Alpine Fir, flax, and a variety of perennials. Along the north property line a pedestrian walkway would be provided to access the abutting city park. This area would include a variety of landscaping including Columnar Tulip trees, groundcovers and shrubs. The proposed landscaping, plant size, type, and location, is appropriate for the proposed development. The street trees along Burnett Avenue South and the plantings proposed along the HEX_Parkside95Burnetl.doc City of Renton PIBIPW Department ' PARKS/DE AT 95 BURNETT PUBLIC HEARING DATE: January 11, 2005 , Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner LUA-04-133, SA-H, ECF, CU-H Page 10 of 13 north property line provide a soft edge to the site and transition the building to the surrounding area. The preliminary landscape plan illustrates materials that would enhance the visual character of the building. The proponents have proposed building modulations, with the projecting townhouse style units in the front of the building along with the modulated roofline to break up the visual appearance of the facades along Burnett Avenue South. The building is setback on the north, east and west sides. The building modulation on all elevations and setbacks are appropriate for the development within the CD zone and Downtown Core. Building Height -The CD zone allows a maximum building height of 95 feet. The maximum height of the proposed building at the parapet would be 68 feet 8 inches. The building height would be 62 feet above the existing grade. The Airport zoning horizontal surface height limit is 179 feet above sea level in this area and the proposal would be below this allowed height. The applicant has provided a varied roofline with a stepped roof plane of parapets with decorative bracing and extended cornices. The applicant has stepped the building down along the east property boundary where the two-story townhouse units would be located in order to transition the structure to the street. Parking, Loading, and Driveway Regulations -Parking is required in the Downtown Core Area for residential uses. One parking space per attached dwelling unit is required. The proposal includes a parking garage that would provide 181 parking stalls. For 106 dwelling units, 106 parking spaces would be required. The applicant is proposing tandem spaces which do not count toward the required parking. There would be a total of 46 tandem spaces (22 spaces on Garage Level 1 and 24 spaces on Garage Level 2). By subtracting these tandem spaces from the total there would be 135 spaces remaining which is 29 parking spaces above the required number. The proposal also includes a leasing office which would require one to two spaces as a minimum for staffing. Additionally, as there would be visitors and on-street parking would be limited, the additional parking spaces would also accommodate visitors. A typical ratio for visitor parking is 0.25 parking spaces per unit; thus 27 parking spaces could serve visitors. Furthermore, it is typical that the tenants of the dwelling units may own more than one vehicle, thus the tandem spaces would potentially serve these users. The modification to the parking requirements has been approved administratively. The two levels of the parking garage would proposed be accessed from two separate driveways from Burnett Avenue South. Garage Level 1 would be a ramp heading downward from the street level on the northeast corner of the building, adjacent to the refuse area. Garage Level 2 would be accessed from a ramp upward from the street level on the south east corner of the building. The parking plan conforms to the minimum requirements for drive aisle and parking stall dimensions and the provision of ADA accessible parking stalls for structured parking. Urban Center Design Overlay Regulations All attached residential (Le. multi family) development and commerciallresidential mixed use development in the Center Downtown (CD) zone requires design review according to the minimum standards and guidelines listed in the Urban Center Design Overlay Regulations (RMC 4-3-100.B). Staff analysis and recommended conditions (if any) are provided in a separate report and the decision to approve is made by the Development Services Director. The project proposal was determined to meet the Design Guidelines as established by City code. As a result the Design Guideline report was approved on December 22, 2004 by the Development Services Division Director. (C) MITIGATION OF IMPACTS TO SURROUNDING PROPERTIES AND USE The subject site is located in downtown Renton and is surrounded by commercially zoned and residential uses. The proposed multi family residential use is not expected to adversely impact surrounding properties. Staff anticipates the project to add value to the site and further enhance the residential opportunities in the downtown area. In addition, the applicant has designed the building to gradually transition from the street to the building fa9ade. The proposed building utilizes a variety of modulation and articulation. At the HEX_Parkside95Burnett.doc City of Renton PIBIPW Department PARKS/DE AT 95 BURNETT PUBLIC HEARING DATE: January 11,2005 .' Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner LUA-04-133, SA-H, ECF, CU-H Page 11 of 13 street level the building is generally setback 6 to 8 feet from the property line with step backs of 2 feet at intervals no longer than 40 feet. In addition, a variety of types of building materials will be used on the street front elevations. Above the street level, the building is modulated such that there are no elevations longer than 40 feet on all elevations. As a result, this lessens the impact of a six story structure. The applicant has also designed the building to step down to two levels above the parking structure along the' east property to be at a pedestrian scale with the surrounding neighborhood. All parking is contained within the building within an enclosed structure. The additional residents would potentially increase the amount of activity in the area and would add to the vibrant, urban activity of the Downtown Core which in turn is in keeping with the implementation of the Comprehensive Plan for the Downtown of Renton. Construction activities would result in some nOise, dust and traffic impacts on surrounding properties. The applicant has submitted a Construction Mitigation Plan outlining mitigation measures to be employed for minimizing dust, noise and traffic impacts during construction. Potential short-term noise and traffic impacts wquld result from the initial construction of the project. Existing code provisions that limit construction work hours, and the applicant's construction mitigation plan, which indicates proposed work hours from 7:00 am to 5:00 pm, Monday through Friday, would mitigate these impacts. (D) MITIGATION OF IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN TO THE SITE The scale, height and bulk of the proposed building is appropriate for the site and would be architecturally compatible with the existing neighborhood. The Six-story building steps down on its frontage with Burnett Ave. South from four residential stories to two stories of townhouse style units with direct access to the street. These ten townhouse style units have second story decks, numerous windows and low brick walls, which help transition the development to the surrounding area. The proposed building would be four stories over two levels of parking, with a maximum building height of 63 feet. Breaking the building into two varied heights above the parking level helps reduce the overall bulk of the project. All residential levels are modulated with decks. . The scale of the building will be broken up through the use of colors. Various colors will be used on the building forms. Color changes will be staggered at floor lines in order to minimize the apparent height of the building and visually reduce the scale. The applicant provided a color and materials board illustrating a variety of materials such as brick veneer, hard i-panels (vertical), hard i-plank (horizontal), and decorative metal screens at the garage levels. Although the proposed building would be taller than surrounding buildings to the south, the immediate area is zoned CD and likely to change as incremental redevelopment occurs. Comprehensive Plan policies encourage taller buildings and more intensive use of properties in the downtown core. The CD zoning allows for a 95-foot height limit. Potential erosion impacts that could occur during project construction would be adequately mitigated by City Code requirements for approval of a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) pursuant to the King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) and a Construction Mitigation Plan prior to issuance of Construction Permits. (E) CONSERVATION OF AREA-WIDE PROPERTY VALUES The proposed multi family development is expected to increase property values in the vicinity of the site. Adding residential population to downtown would improve the customer base for commercial businesses and the completed project is also expected to increase property values. Moreover, as a result of this development, this area of the City's downtown would be enhanced. HEX_Parkside95Bumelt.doc City of Renton PIBIPW Department PARKS/DE AT 95 BURNETT .-~, PUBLIC HEARING DATE: January 11,2005 Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner LUA-04-133, SA-H, ECF, CU-H Page 12 of 13 (F) SAFETY AND EFFICIENCY OF VEHICLE AND PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION A Traffic Impact Analysis was submitted by the applicant as prepared by Jake Traffic Engineering (JTE) Inc., dated September 10, 2004. The report reviewed existing conditions and projected Level of Service (LOS) conditions at year 2009. The proposal would result in an increase in traffic trips to the City's street system. The proposed project is expected to generate 641 new average daily trips. The previous site development was documented to generate 349 daily trips for a net trip of 292 daily trips. The ERC placed a mitigation measure on the project requiring a Transportation Mitigation Fee. The Transportation Mitigation Fee is based on a rate of $75.00 per new average daily trip generated by the project. Credit for existing trips generated by the former uses on the site would be applied. The Renton Transit Center is located south of South 2nd Street which is about % mile to the south of the subject project which is within walking distance of the proposed project. Vehicles will enter and exit the parking garage via two separate driveways from Burnett Avenue South. The driveways would cross over the public sidewalk. To warn exiting vehicles and provide notice to pedestrians crossing these driveways, staff recommends as a condition of site plan approval that mirrors, warning devices or other safety equipment at both driveways/garage ramps be installed. Construction truck hauling hours are limited to between 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. under the Development Guidelines Ordinance in order to avoid conflicts with peak hour traffic. The Traffic Planning Section will review construction-related impacts prior to issuing final construction permits. (G) PROVISION OF ADEQUATE LIGHT AND AIR The residential units are on top of the parking garage and incorporate building modulation and articulation to break up the building bulk and mass. This allows adequate natural light and air to reach all the residential units. The height of the proposed building is not expected to cast significant shade impacts on the surrounding area. The applicant has indicated that the west side of the building, adjacent to the park would reduce the amount of light reaching the park area and trees within the park. The applicant submitted a Tree Condition Evaluation and Impact Assessment Report prepared by Arboricultural Consulting with the land use application. The report indicated that the introduction of the building would alter the light environment by removing light from the east. Currently, the trees within the park are well exposed to the entire southern horizon allowing them to make use of light throughout the day. After construction, light would only be received in the afternoon hours. The report continues that the trees are young and vigorous to recover from this change and would survive. The height of these trees is between 20 to 35 feet. Exterior onsite lighting, including security lighting is regulated by code. Compliance with this code (RMC 4-4-075) ensures that all building lights are directed onto the building or the ground and can not trespass beyond the property lines. Staff does not anticipate that exterior lighting would become an issue due to the building's location and the adjacent uses provided code requirements are met. (H) MITIGATION OF NOISE, ODORS AND OTHER HARMFUL OR UNHEALTHY CONDITIONS It is anticipated that the most significant noise, odor and other potentially harmful impacts would occur during the construction phase of the project. The applicant has submitted a Construction Mitigation Plan that provides measures to reduce construction impacts such as noise, control of dust, traffic controls, etc. The proposed development would not generate any harmful or unhealthy conditions. There would be noise impacts of increased traffic and activity that are normally associated with a residential population. The applicant has indicated that the trash collection and recycling areas will be contained within the building. HEX_Parkside95Burnett.doc City of Renton PIB/PW Department PARKS/DE AT 95 BURNETT Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner LUA-04-133, SA-H, ECF, CU-H PUBLIC HEARING DA TE: January 11, 2005 Page 13 of 13 (I) AVAILABILITY OF PUBLIC SERVICES AND FACILITIES TO ACCOMMODATE THE PROPOSED USE Fire Department, Police and Parks staff have indicated existing facilities are adequate to accommodate the subject proposal, subject to the applicant's payment of the necessary impact fees. As imposed by the ERC, the applicant will be required to pay Fire and Parks Mitigation fee prior to the issuance of building permits. Water service and other utilities are available in Burnett Avenue South and would be extended as necessary to the building by the applicant as required by City code. (J) PREVENTION OF NEIGHBORHOOD DETERIORATION AND BLIGHT The proposal would redevelop a site that is currently vacant. The investment in the area and the added presence of a residential population would serve to prevent neighborhood deterioration and blight. Coordinated site improvements including landscaping, parking, signage and lighting would be included as part of this development. It is antiCipated that the 106 unit residential development would further contribute to the Downtown Core by redeveloping vacant parcels. H. RECOMMENDA TION: Staff recommends approval of the Parkside at 95 Burnett, Project File No. LUA-04-133, SA-H, ECF, CU-H subject to the following conditions. 1. The installation of mirror, warning devices or other or other safety equipment at both driveways/garage ramps shall be incorporated into the final building design and completed prior to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy. The satisfaction of this requirement is subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Project Manager at the time of building permit review. EXPIRATION PERIODS: Site Plan Approvals (SA): Two (2) years from the final approval (signature) date. Conditional Use Permits: Two (2) years from the final approval date. HEX_Parkside95Burnett.doc EXHIBIT 2 1.1. ······· ... ,'1 . § .... '.' . ., z !w~~:L I _ ' .. I i I ..-.. I I ' ~'!I I I , w I ~ , EXHIBIT 3 ~ " ~ , i I I f f/ ~ 1J IU .... 7:" 0 c: (I) IU ... <0 01 m c: .... :::J (I) :::: ! ~ ... Ul ~ 'T' tU ~ !iL ; J : ~ .. I!I~ 1:1 ! ~j ~ ~: ~ r m < m r SfTE PlAN REVIEW SUBMnTAL 10118J04 EXHIBIT 4 /" '~ LO l- ID :c X w o 0 (0 (0 (0 (0 IV 0 8 0 .... ~ (9 (~r (;:> 0) (-;:) (i) (D Q) C) 0) (Zl 0 (~) (~~ (§J (:iJ ~) ,f¥~~S~;~~~~1'r,,~ I II ~ .. -I I I . : : H :2E .. i l I ~! ~ : i H ~ I : I , . " ~ 1 I t i iii . ..--I !I ! 1 ~l I r}f:~~:~c:c , , i/' , , ,,'~'JtrJ ~ " I' " C"C't::::t~~t,;~;J ~ I % iii i ~''''''~ ---1 I i ~----1-l I ' -----rl ---·1--· -lJ I I l--j--T, . I ii J I 1 ' '-1-I ---,-,-1-----1-----'----,-·-...j.JIHr~--1 • , , ' I 1 ' " , 1 " . , , , . .~' "... '. . . . . . . . . . . . . I' . . I", r :: I 1" -I ; I i j. I! i ! I I . ~ \')~, , , .,. I' I' •• II •• , ••• ' •• ',. ., I t· , .. I.~~ ., .,., ' I' I~ ,-) ~ I I I ... , ' I I. I I ,_ " : -';!1 i ! -----,-I -= ___ I .' .~_~L_L ___ -'---~'] , -1---:1---,---' -: 1 , '-1-1-----1---1--1"-f ~~-,--,---,-'-1 fll I~ I 11_.l_L"_'_L.j_ . .L~L .. _.L_L.._._.L1.:~_.~ .. j':,._L~, .. J ,., _-, .. __ .. ~L.~ .. j.~L ... L __ ~/ i , I _ :: ,I I, I, I, !£. 1":"1 ' ..:.. • 1 I I ,I I' ',I ! ~:I { I (-rl ~n_ .. ~.'=n~ .. ~.~_n~n3.:_::~n_n_n_ .. _n_ .. _n_ .. _n_n_n_n~~;~n_ .. ~~_~:~~.r~.~~!.~~F~~~';.~~~n_n .. _n_n_n_n~n=n_ .. _n_n_ .. _ .. _ .. _ .. _n_ .. _/// /lirl'~ ! ~l I I // 1: I I ti, :, 'I I _........ ': '~j' i {I' : ; ; / ii .. .\!.) 1 11 [':-ll'-:'Jn~n[':-TI-:'Jin~TI ·:-ll·-:·T·~T·~-r-'-·l,n~·I·~_'I·-'-·lln~. L-l-'-']; n~r~·-r·~n~n~r:-l·~·T~r~·-n . ·T~r~·-t~·T~·t~·-ffl:nTn~[~-r·~n~~ "_" '_-ili II ' ,-,-------'I-J-J-----'----I-'-l--l-,-Jf'-'--i------,ill J" , > ----'1 '-j---' i -------, l ------, 1---------i--~ 1 .-----, I -------' ~-----, ; ------'_',-,' ------, '--T---' j_---e--, ----j-" I I I I I I ' I I I I I I r", I I I 'II I I, I j I I I _ ~ 1~·=-t~~~~1=~e=~~~::=p~#~~=~:=j-=~~t~~~t=~~--~~~--~-::=~:=-=~~~-=~~==t~=~==~~::-.j~-=~~~~=~~~~:!~r···!·l··;j~ o 0 0) 0 0 0) 0 G 0 0 () 0) 0) 0 0) (~) 8 (~) G 0 (0 G) C:) 0 0) § (~) (§J GARAGE LEVEL 2 PLAN . . ........... . 5GAlE· ;VS=-~I'~O .. -z J:::::- --. Parkside at 95 Burnett ~I-rl-II I ~.=.~=:-= .. --.................. __ .. ...... ___ .. _ ..... _.u .. _ ... _=:~. TSA'", hit .... ". , .. ',. 5011"'A_SJl.Som:J(l1 IIdo_W",_ ToI2!.oIII\a2I P~UAOIJI6)II -- ~ ~ I ........... ~ IA2.21! ""'" ~ ~ :0 ~ m ;; ~ ~ c 1; m ·z :::! ~ r-m < m r- EXHIBIT 6 \I ;;t " .. I . I -J i. I.· Iii UWillI I I f ~ ~ -: ... ~ s: CD I» -CD C1I OJ c: ... :::J CD =: I ; rn f-i·> gil , d 1 I .J EXHIBIT 7 I I 1 I ~::D ~o ~ .. 0 ~ ~'TI -: Ii" > ~ t~ z ~ a: (1) I» -co 01 OJ c 3 (1) ::: I I f , ~ " I» .., ~ £e. 0. C» I» -<0 01 ~ ~ m C/J ~ -t m m r-r-m m < < ~ ~ (5 (5 z Z I I ED " c .., I» :::J .., G ~ == ~ G :::J ED C G c 3 !» C» ::: I -4 II> ~ q . ~ i ;. t ~. n-l--, . ;: r p I EXHIBIT 9 IIIIIIII I f ~ ~ "'tJ S» ~ ~ C'I) c: CD S» -U) 01 m c:: 3 CD -- I liZ ~o ":tJ ~-t : % ~m r-m < ~ (5 Z EXHIBIT JO IJ i ~ - i f ~ ~ ""0 Q) ..... " C/J 0: CD Q) -CD C1I III c: ..... ::::J CD .-+ - i ... '" ~ rn; § > -, Bil :: g i ~ ~ .. SITE PlAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL 10118104 EXHIBIT 11 / I i / / I ------~- WII o . "------1..;('/ BURNETT AVENUE SOUTH ____ ~'4a ___ _ --·06 _.- • -. ~ m f:·:::::~::::::~:::1 ---0 0 -0 --RI --~ STREET LEVEL PLANT SCHEDULE ............... -_ ... -I ~"'_~"'IL _H .... ~C.'~1' pc.t.Mlrl'tkll. """""' ..... -~T."""'*'1\I1' "1I2'c:a."""~1I. ~fIQNI''''''''' .......... lIoIIaH II ..... -....... -"""-I'~W~ -........ _-' ..... oe. ... _-... - SUGGESTED CONTAINER PLANTS = ----.. ..... .-. ....... oIiCIIIl~NJ,t1rXW .. .................. AIC:IIIlJ.tlliClrlClft'Q:lfUL1WIt' .. -...-_1<_ .. ......... --.. -_ ..... 1"'NCIIt'U111tWC'~"""" .... --..... ,.....,.18W( . .wx...uo ...... ---... ~-. ..... ----.....". ...... -.iBU1WIIL'AllU'tlJI:1'r ...... """'" --...... -_ .... "'" ----.... -_ .... ..... _. ..,.,. .... -.... ----...... -aamtall. 'ItI!IWD...,.. ...... ....... -"""-...... ,..,. ..... -...... tI.H.J--i SCALE: 1'. 10' l 7 BURNETT 85 Ranton, WA ---.... ---~,..; - ....... • LANDSCAPE PLAN ........ L-1.0 C"J BURNETT AVENUE SOUTH ----. o ---....... -P"'IIa"ICan'LIIIMM:Wrt i , , , , , 8:---- "" 10, , , , , """""" -~ _.-• -. ~ m t:·~·:;:~:;::·1 """""--0 <:) -0 -.. IIl!m -~ STREET LEVEL PLANT SCHEDULE """" ........... ........ 'oUIIIMIIW I ~ ............... --,...,. ,."..c:.WIIfDC:AI,l" Jlc.t. ... rf'll.tI. _IILP_ ~T.WTIM4,," I-WCII. •• teL ... ClGlllll'fQM ........ ~"'MoffCM I' ...... ----........ -I'·w= ----IGII. ... cc. ...... -... - SUGGESTED CONTAINER PLANTS --_ ...... .. IW._""'" MB~9W.PCCIM' .. -... ..... ""'" AaIIIt oWaICIIf 'CII:atL ,.,.... .. ---,,-.. ..".'" -.......-.. --""" f'IMCiIIIt'Ut1lKO(.Ta1.CI! .... ...... --""" PtIOIItU111tWC • .wx ...w-...... --... -...-...... -----...... -.. .......... Alll\l'ttJ(1f" ...... --...... -_ .. .... ...". ---.... --_P. .... _. Ml»T4.DoICIDT' .... ... ----...... -&lClrMt.ll1I,~"""" ..... --........ -.J~ ".,., --..... ru-u-----i $CALE: 1'. 10' ~ -.:z.. --M- BURNETT 95 Ranton,WA -=.. .... ..., -..., ....... -........ - .., .... 4 LANDSCAPE PLAN L-1.1 IMCP) e & ZONING +~+ PIBIPW 'l"J!CBNICAL BBIlVICBS Ii 1lIOfI03 18 T23N R5E E 1/2 EXHIBIT 14 STAFF City of Renton Department of Planning / Building / Pub ';~ t"~.~R'~5~2ro'f REPORT -. ~E122 Urban Center Design Overlay Regulat ':"~~ME INITIAUDATE BACKGROUND REPORT DATE Project Name Applicant Contact: File Number Project Description Project Location Exist. Bldg. Area gsf Site Area CRITERIA: DISTRICT A ~~I~~ I \:21'2l \ f) '+ December 22, 2004 ~~~Itl~ ~HI'f.'W ~ I'l'w A;1\5. ,\JfuJ'YJ1, !\. Parks ide at 95 Burnett Parks ide at 95 Burnett LLC 2256 38th PL E. Seattle, WA 98112 Kent Smutny, TSA Architects, PLLC 50 116th Ave. SE, Ste. 201 Bellevue, WA 98004 LUA-04-133, SA-H, ECF, CU-H Project Manager Susan A. Fiala The applicant is requesting Hearing Examiner Site Plan and Hearing Examiner Conditional Use approval for a 147,430 sq. ft. multi family residential development. The site is 0.83 acres in size and is relatively flat with no known critical areas. The project would include 106 dwelling units, indoor exercise room, common areas and service areas within six building levels including four residential, and two levels of structured parking of which one level would be below grade. Ten of the multi family units would be townhouse style and front directly onto Burnett Ave. So. The remaining multi family units would be setback from the street. The structured parking garage would include 181 parking stalls of which 46 would be tandem. The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit in order to increase the density above the maximum of the CD zone. The subject property is located within the Center Downtown (CD) zoning designation, Downtown Core and Urban Center Design Overlay District A. 77 and 95 Burnett Avenue South Vacant Proposed New Bldg. Area: 147,430 sq. ft. 0.83 acres (gross) Total Building Area gsf: 147,430 sq. ft. A. SITE DESIGN AND BUILDING LOCATION 1. Site Design and Street Pattern: Minimum Standards: Maintain existing grid street pattern. The project is located on a mid-block parcel with no plans to change the street grid. The street pattern will remain as existing. 2. Building Location and Orientation: Buildings shall be oriented to the street with clear connections to the sidewalk. All entries would be directly off the Burnett Ave. So. sidewalk. The building and its entries would be orientated to Burnett Ave. South. 3. Building Entries: A primary entrance of each building shall be located on the fagade facing the street. The main pedestrian entry and both vehicular entries to the proposed multi family development face Burnett Avenue South. The applicant has enhanced the building entrance by a canopy and unique, prominent architectural treatment by using large windows set in a masonry fa<tade that extend almost from floor to ceiling. The proposed pedestrian walkway would provide a clear connection from the public sidewalk to the City's park on the north side of the development. The main entry would also be direct accessed from the public sidewalk. In addition, individual units, of a townhouse style, would be at grade level along Burnett Avenue South and would contain individual private entries onto Burnett Avenue South. STAFF REPORT BACKGROUND REPORT DATE Project Name Applicant Contact: File Number Project Description Project Location Exist. Bldg. Area gsf Site Area City of Renton Department of Planning / Building / Public Works Urban Center Design Overlay Regulations December 22, 2004 Parks ide at 95 Burnett Parks ide at 95 Burnett LLC 2256 38th PL E. Seattle, WA 98112 Kent Smutny, TSA Architects, PLLC 50 116th Ave. SE, Ste. 201 Bellevue, WA 98004 LUA-04-133, SA-H, ECF, CU-H Project Manager Susan A. Fiala The applicant is requesting Hearing Examiner Site Plan and Hearing Examiner Conditional Use approval for a 147,430 sq. ft. multi family residential development. The site is 0.83 acres in size and is relatively flat with no known critical areas. The project would include 106 dwelling units, indoor exercise room, common areas and service areas within six building levels including four residential, and two levels of structured parking of which one level would be below grade. Ten of the multi family units would be townhouse style and front directly onto Burnett Ave. So. The remaining multi family units would be setback from the street. The structured parking garage would include 181 parking stalls of which 46 would be tandem. The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit in order to increase the density above the maximum of the CD zone. The subject property is located within the Center Downtown (CD) zoning designation, Downtown Core and Urban Center Design Overlay District A. 77 and 95 Burnett Avenue South Vacant Proposed New Bldg. Area: 147,430 sq. ft. 0.83 acres (gross) Total Building Area gsf: 147,430 sq. ft. CRITERIA: DISTRICT A A. SITE DESIGN AND BUILDING LOCATION 1. Site Design and Street Pattern: Minimum Standards: Maintain existing grid street pattern. The project is located on a mid-block parcel with no plans to change the street grid. The street pattern will remain as existing. 2. Building Location and Orientation: Buildings shall be oriented to the street with clear connections to the sidewalk. All entries would be directly off the Burnett Ave. So. sidewalk. The building and its entries would be orientated to Burnett Ave. South. 3. Building Entries: A primary entrance of each building shall be located on the fa9ade facing the street. The main pedestrian entry and both vehicular entries to the proposed multi family development face Burnett Avenue South. The applicant has enhanced the building entrance by a canopy and unique, prominent architectural treatment by using large windows set in a masonry fac;ade that extend almost from floor to ceiling. The proposed pedestrian walkway would provide a clear connection from the public sidewalk to the City's park on the north side of the development. The main entry would also be direct accessed from the public sidewalk. In addition, individual units, of atownhouse style, would be at grade level along Burnett Avenue South and would contain individual private entries onto Burnett Avenue South. City of Renton PIBIPW Department PARKS/DE AT 95 BURNETT REPORT OF DECEMBER 22, 2004 Urb. enter Design Overtay Regulations LUA-04-133, SA-H, ECF, CU-H Page 20(5 Guidelines focus on providing clear architectural entrance features with lobbies, canopies and ornamental lighting. Also encouraged are pedestrian pathways, plazas and landscaping. The applicant is proposing to provide a well-defined main entrance to the structure. The proposal complies with the minimum standards of this criterion. No additional guidelines are suggested. 4. Transition to Surrounding Development -Minimum Standards: Careful siting and qesign treatment is necessary to achieve a compatible transition where new buildings differ from surrounding development in terms of building height, bulk and scale. The following design elements shall be considered to promote a transition to surrounding uses: • Setbacks at the side or rear of a building may be increased in order to reduce the bulk and scale of larger building and so that sunlight reaches adjacent yards; • Building proportions, including step backs on upper levels; • Building articulation to divide a larger architectural element into smaller pieces; • Rooflines, pitches and shapes. The proposed development holds the street edge unlike current buildings, which have parking lots between them and the street edge. To the south of the site are underdeveloped single-family lots. To the north is multi family housing (55 Williams) similar in scale to the proposed project. The six-story building steps down on its frontage with Burnett Ave. South from four residential stories to two stories of townhouse style units with direct access to the street. These ten townhouse style units have second story decks, numerous windows and low brick walls, which help transition the development to the surrounding area. The proposed building would be four stories over two levels of parking, with a maximum building height of 63 feet. Breaking the building into two varied heights above the parking level helps reduce the overall bulk of the project. All residential levels are modulated with decks. The scale of the building will be broken up through the use of colors. Various colors will be used on the building forms. Color changes will be staggered at floor lines in order to minimize the apparent height of the building and visually reduce the scale. Although the proposed building would be taller than surrounding buildings to the south, the immediate area is zoned CD and likely to change as incremental redevelopment occurs. Comprehensive Plan policies encourage taller buildings and more intensive use of properties in the downtown core. The CD zoning allows for a 95-foot height limit. The proposal complies with the minimum standards of this criterion. No additional guidelines are suggested. B. PARKING, ACCESS, CIRCULATION 1. Location of Parking -Minimum Standards: No parking shall be located between a building and front property line or street side of a corner lot 2. Design of Surface Parking -Minimum Standards: Parking lot lighting shall not spill onto adjacent of abutting properties. 3. Structure/Garage Parking -No minimum standard. Guidelines state that parking entries should not dominate the streetscape. Parking garages should be architecturally compatible with the residential portion of the building. The parking structure should be enclosed or screened through any combination of walls, decorative grilles, or trellis work with landscaping. Garage parking should be secure. The street side of parking garages in the CD zone should incorporate retail or service commercial facilities. There is no surface parking proposed. All 181 parking stalls are contained within the first two levels of the building. Two entries to the parking garages would be from Burnett Ave. South located at the furthest. The parking levels would be accessed at the furthest north and the furthest south portions of the building. City of Renton PIBIPW Department PARKS/DE AT 95 BURNETT REPORT OF DECEMBER 22, 2004 Urb. enter Design Overlay Regulations LUA-04-133, SA-H, ECF, CU-H Page 30'5 The garage entries are located away from the main pedestrian entry at the center of the building. The parking would be secured with doors and setback from the street. The parking levels are enclosed by wall and decorative screens on the west and north elevations. The south elevation of the garage is enclosed by a solid wall. 4. Vehicular Access -No minimum standard. Guidelines state parking should be accessed from alleys or side streets. Driveways should be visible from the right-of-way but not impede pedestrian circulation. There are no secondary streets surrounding the development. There would be one curb cut for each driveway into each level of parking because the site configuration constrains the ability to interconnect the two parking levels within the structure. The proposal complies with the minimum standards of this criterion. C. PEDESTRIAN ENVIRONMENT 1. Streets, Driveways and Parking Lots: Parking for the proposed project is consolidated in a two level structure that has one driveway entrance for each level thus requiring two curb cuts and access points that cross the sidewalk. 2. Pedestrian Circulation: The pedestrian entry to the building is directly off of the sidewalk that will run along Burnett Ave. South. The required open space is provided two levels up from the street level and can be accessed directly from the Burnett Ave. South frontage. Additional pedestrian access is provided between the park in the west side and Burnett via a pathway on the north end of the site. D. LANDSCAPING/RECREATION/COMMON SPACE 1. Landscaping: Street trees shall be located between the curb and building .... A planting strip with trees between the street curb and the sidewalk that provides a landscaped area at the front of the building and separate pedestrian circulation from automobile traffic. All landscape will be irrigated. Container planting will be utilized at the main building entry and at each of the individual unit entries along Burnett Ave. South to help delineate those entries. 2. Recreation Areas and Common Open Space: Attached housing developments of 10 or more dwelling units shall provide a minimum area of common space or recreation area equal to 50 square feet per unit. The common space area should be aggregated to provide usable area(s) for residents. The proposed project consists of 106 dwelling units, which would require 5,300 square feet of common space. The proposal includes 6,950 square feet of common area, which exceeds the minimum amount necessary. The common areas include an exercise room, a common gathering space and a common terrace at the third level of the building. All of the common areas would be open and accessible to all residents. The courtyard areas would utilize landscape planters and trellises to create a separation between private outdoor areas of the first level units and the common courtyards. The proposed common areas comply with the minimum standard and guidelines of this criterion. E. BUILDING ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN 1 . Building Character and Massing -All building facades shall include modulation or artiCUlation at intervals of no more than 40 feet. The proposed building utilizes a variety of modulation and articulation. At the street level the building is generally setback 6 to 8 feet from the property line in order to provide private outdoor space for each townhouse unit. Textured CMU landscaped walls will be used on the street front elevations. Above the street level the building is modulated such that there are no elevations longer than 40 feet. A variety of deSign elements such as color, window fenestration, porches, etc. will also assist in breaking up the expansive length of the structure. The townhouse units provides a setback and residential character from the street front which brings the structure to a human scale while the remaining building is more urban in character. As a result, the majority of the proposal complies with the minimum standard and guidelines of this criterion. City of Renton PIBIPW Department PARKS/DE AT 95 BURNETT REPORT OF DECEMBER 22, 2004 Urbc ,mter Design Overlay Regulations LUA-04-133, SA-H, ECF, CU-H Page 40'5 2. Ground Level Details: There are no blank walls in the project. The longest wall would be articulated with openings having decorative metal grille work with vertical mullions that align with vertical elements in the residential portion of the building. 3. Building Rooflines -Building rooflines should be varied by emphasizing dormers, chimneys, stepped roofs, gables, prominent cornice or fascia, or be broken or articulated to add visual interest to the building. A variation of roof heights are used in the project to break down the scale of the building and create the feeling that the project is a city block made up of different buildings. The roofs are capped with deep overhangs articulated with knee braces that act as projecting cornice elements, giving a defined top to the building and providing shadow across the building elevations that will vary throughout the day and provide visual interest to the building elevations. The proposal complies with this criterion. 4. Building Materials -Exterior finishes should add visual interest and detail and be made of material that is durable, high quality and easily maintained. The base of the building is faced with durable materials including a textured CMU landscape wall and other masonry materials at the front entry. The concrete portions of the parking structure wall that fronts on the park will be color and will be broken up with reveals that align with vertical elements of the residential portion of the elevation above. The upper levels use "lighter' materials including bevel and panel siding. A conceptual materials and color board was provided by the applicant. Hardi-plank siding, hard i-panel with batten siding, brick and decorative metal grilles are proposed for the structure of a complementary color-palette. The proposed building materials meet this criterion. F. Decision Parkside at 95 Burnett, File No. LUA-04-133, SA-H, ECF, CU-H is determined to comply with the minimum standards and guidelines of the Urban Center Design Overlay Regulations, RMC 4-3-100 for District A. EFFECTIVE DATE OF DECISION ON LAND USE ACTION: December 22, 2004 SIGNATURE: Neil Watts, Development Services Director date City of Renton PIBIPW Department PARKSIDE A T 95 BURNETT REPORT OF DECEMBER 22, 2004 TRANSMITTED this 22nd day of December, 2004 to the applicant and owner: Parks ide at 95 Burnett LLC 2256 38th PL East Seattle, WA 98112 TRANSMITTED this 22nd day of December, 2004 to the contact: Kent Smutny, TSA Architects, PLLC 50 116th Ave. SE, Ste. 201 Bellevue, WA 98004 TRANSMITTED this 22nd day of December, 2004 to Parties of Record. Robert T. Cooper Mary Brown 87 Williams Avenue S 55 Williams Avenue S ste: #304 Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055 Donald C. Erue 14415 12th Avenue SW Seattle, WA 98166 Bruce & Cathy Pope 55 Williams Avenue S ste: #105 Renton, WA 98055 TRANSMITTED this 22nd day of December, 2004 to the following: Larry Meckling, Building Official Stan Engler, Fire Prevention Neil Watts, Development Services Director Jennifer Henning, Development Services Division Kayren Kittrick, Public Works Division Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney South County Journal Urbc mter Design Overlay Regulations LUA-04-133, SA-H, ECF, CU-H Page 5 of 5 Land Use Decision Appeal Process Appeals of Urban Center Design Overlay Regulations decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM January 10, 2005. If no appeals are filed by this date, the action will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11B. Additional information regarding the appeal process Imay be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. .. I .. I I i I i __ 1 (.i) "lS N1~ ~ _ --' -/ i I I ~i' 1~«: « I ~ .. ! ... ~ / / i / / I --.-----~- o . Wv ____ /)(1 BURNEll AVENUE SOUTH __ - _ -':JQr}Q:4U ___ _ "--r!6 _.-• -. ~ fBI l:::;::i::i:::::::l --0 0 -0 -.. mI --m STREET LEVEL PLANT SCHEDULE ................. ,...... ... '»GM:IIII' I ~ .... -~ ...... -, ..... ~c.'~1' rCll.lMu· ..... .....---~'.NI1DIAnH I-WCll.ae. .. I1II. ... DlWl'faHr_ ... ....."". .. \WI!LH ,-- """"' ....... -..... -I ....... ac. . ----IIIIt, ... oe. -"""-... - SUGGESTED CONTAINER PLANTS ----I: l1l.I..-. ...... ACa..lolflDllQttNJ.1'ICiQII' ....... --....... AalltJoUlClrll»t'CIQIW.a.tNt' ....,....,--..Il_ -......... -........... -.... _ ...... f'IaIII1U1'1:1tWc'1'Il..I..c. ....... , ..... I0Il_ ...... P'WCW'U'!'JIIW(.,WK......,.. , .... ..... .....-... ....-...-, ..... --...... _-, ..... -1EEU1VM,'.unntlf:l'(" , ..... ...... ...... -, .... ........ ............ .... CQBI) ---.... -_ .... .... _. """" .... -,..,. 1IID_ --, .... -ar:N't'ttaP.'ltl!!lULDCWIJ1"f'" ...... ....... .... ..... -.... --I' .... o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. SCALE: 1'. 10' -_._-.... --...... BURNETT 95 Renton, WA -=.-.... ......,. ---~ - ... .... ~ ~ 4 LANDSCAPE PLAN iiUiiol ..... L-1.0 4 BURNETT AVENUE SOUTH ---tIT o i , , , , , "8:---- ~: , , , , .:" -"... ~ _.- • -. ~ -t:::::::::::d - 0 0 -0 --m!!!!I -- STREET LEVEL PlANT SCHEDULE .............. -1IIWCIIIIA.'.INIIHIIJIf I'CoI,"'~"'''' --~G.w.toc:Ml' JlCIt,De.D' ..... -.... -~T.~ ""'Cll.ae."""'" C!IIIWPQHT ... .,.. 1IfIrIIII'1\I1 •• Wt&II , ....... --_CoIL_ I .... WQC. -----I_Wac. ---AI- SUGGESTED CONTAINER PlANTS ..... -_ ..... I~ IW.'-""", oAI::IR,I,IifIIQtCU1t'W.1'tDCIN' ...... _""'" oIIC8II~'CICIIW.eNK' ---.oil_ -..----..... PMCW1Ut 1DWC .1'8..I.IaI ........ '6!L. --""" 1"'MCW'Ut18Wc',Wk..,..,. . ...... .... ~ -.-u._ ..... ------..... -.. ..... VM.·oIImItCJat" ..... ...... --. .... _ •. -............ -..... -_ •. ..... --.ar"'.0IIQ0'I'" ..... ""'---...... -1!IICIft'KII ... 'I!I'aULD....,.,.. ...... --.... CoIL_ ...... ""'" --...... h.fLj--i SCALE: l' D 10' BURNETT 95 Renton. WA ---"'" "'" ----,...... - .., ..... ..... --~ • LANDSCAPE PLAN L-1.1 O'M~ .. ~-.:Ic."",. e~"...eI!te:.TlClNMI"CM. _ ............ O":"'~~tHTMJ . o 1I::;~~Tt.M. [::J=~=-~~~ JIA,'mRI"1It/IrC.IQ.II' .. Cll'el.L. ... IH1S(Qte ... THIIIOOM ~ ~.,.L.....,.. , ... _ .. ,lI#04lMtl. C=>1':"'="~:IIHf""'.1 t )=,=~DINCI'ao~ftD c:::::)IJOIG.ATelgOQIIlT'l"P'!!, "-' -Kl~tc.HCCU.LtHt'........ I11III ~TSPlt ..... ".MC1I'eP. RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 1 PLAN ~AI...e, Sr.52".!·-O" • 'r"''''''''''' r""""" ""'IC.o. I. ~ .... 1'Dne"N.t.t:tI/'M\D,...,AJ. I".frCoetll'~r"'£J,l'YICet:tl/'''''*' """JOIIlc:amlllLJllt(Jl'f'I!tIn'(l'W.Uwc.o. -... -~. IXIMICIIIJWU1'D.M~""".1IJI.O.I, IIft1JIlICII; IW.Lt Tal • :r.4 tl\Clt, nP. tIMJ. JILI.~"nCIIIi'fD.GIIlIlCUl"""""'fI!IJ -........ .. POIl~NO...,.~nftt NO ........... -..-. ... 'nOMt. -_ ... 4.POIlI"I.A"~_lI.II.DIlCIolIII'.lICiINa. -'11GIlMNGCoCM-.TICMt.-'"nCIIIiM 18r 1'1"= II __ .~ Parkslde at 95 Bu~tt _I OUI~,n\;I r",""," "'" I c.o. I. _IIUIYIDU/III"LNTf\.CJIOII;P'l..NIt.~TIQM,. I"CIIIIIII:II!TI\IL.EI)"",""",",~ c.ca.nu:.,""",~e~ 2._lMANeIJtT~"TC:III;(.QIIIII~ IM"TlClKMP'OIIItll!fJ\II.CP~11CIM 4JlTMA~noM,~~J • . ......,....L~....,...I'OIl~ ""'""NlMCI'L'I" ... tmI"'-HtOM _rolWPOIl~tII'--. ... ne-...:R ... 1'D ..... ~ -. 1.1II11'T11V1l1ltec.'nCIMN I'OII.tefMZl) ~"nCIIIiOll.'III"&\'I\II2t.""~ I'W.LA,...,... ... ~~~ ... " I .............. e ~II .1~_a.a._:IDI ~~~QS.AOU_ --~iI TSA'-,.,I""II. ~ = ==; ~ . ~ 'q ~ ~I'I ~H ~ i;; I .. " ~ f! I ; I :t: CD E :::J m 10 0) -as CD :2 ~ ~ :. ~ s I I l-mTTTl I~".·l··~.· ~ I ::: ~ :J en CD m 10 0) 1G :J f6 ~ CD .lI:: "0 ... as ";'; i Q. ~ I ... E z as :J 0 Q. m !;( ~ I Z > 8 0 w I ~ ..J, W ~ > t-;., I W U):l ..J' W ~ Wi ti~ 3: ~ c( ~ wl z o !;( [ij ...I W J: li: o z t ;; ; :: ;.; I EH ~ ij: I ~ .. oC f! I t: CD E :::J III 10 0) -as CD 'tl °CiS ~ ~ as 0- ~ 8 I I ~ , I" .:~ IM(P) Airport Way ZONING P!BIPW TBCBNICAL 8BlLVICES UlO4I03 CD(P) S 2nd St. --- -Benton diV UmltII F3 18 T23N R5E E 1/2 ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION & PUBLIC HEARING ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED (DNS-M) ! POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: Parkside at 95 Burnett Avenue PROJECT NUMBER: LUA04-133, SA-H, ECF, CU-H LOCATION: 77 & 95 Burnett Avenue S DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review, Hearing Examiner Site Plan and Hearing Examiner Conditional Use approval for a 147,430 sq. ft. multi family residential development. The site Is 0.83 acres In size and Is relatively flat with no known critical areas. The project would include 106 dwelling units, indoor exercise room, common areas and service areas within six building levels Including four residential, and two levels of structured parking of which one level would be below grade. Ten of the multi family units would be townhouse style and front directly onto Burnett Ave. So. The remaining multi family units would be setback from the street. The structured parking garage would Include 181 parking stalls of which 46 would be tandem. The applicant Is requesting a conditional use permit In order to Increase the density above the maximum of the CD zone. The subject property is located within the Center Downtown (CD) zoning designation, Downtown Core and Urban Center Design Overlay District A. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on December',27, 2004. Appeals must be filed In writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 O.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE 7TH FLOOR OF CITY HALL, 1055 SOUTH GRADY WAY, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON JANUARY 11, 2005 AT 9:00 AM TO CONSIDER THE SITE PLAN AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT. IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED, THE APPEAL WILL BE HEARD AS PART OF THIS PUBLIC HEARING. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT (425) 430-7200. ' DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION ".',el~~~~:;ii't~lu~,~!,~~;p~qj~C:t',NPIVI,I3ER;Whel1C:~llil1g,forproper'fi,le:identification. Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor. December 9, 2004 Kent Smut~y TSA Architects, PLLC 50-116th AvenueSE #201 Bellevue, WA 98004 , .' "" .. , . , SLJBJECT: . Parksideat 9SSurriettAvenue LUA04-133, SA~H; ECF, CU~H DearMr. Smutny: . . CITY~")F RENTON Plannln~uildinglPublic Wodes Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator. · This letter is written 'onbehalf oftheEnvironmental Review Cqmmittee (ERG) and is to advise' you that they have completed their' reviewofthe'subject~ph)lect'The ERC issued' a thre~hbldDetermin~~ttion of· Nqn7Significance,Mitigated with MitigationMeasures. PI,ease' ~efer to the enclosed Mitigation Measures . document. ' .. . ..... Appeals of theerivironmentatdetermination must befih~din· writing on or before 5:00 PM on Decemller .27, 2()04.AppeaJsrnust be filed in'llriting together with the 'r~quired.$75.00 .application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1Q55 SQl!thGrady Way, Remtori" WA 98055. Appeals to the · Examiner aregovern~d by City of Re'nton.', MuriiqjpaLCod~'Section 4-8-t10.B. . Additional .. information regarding the appeal process may"be obtair;H:~d fronlthe)~rer1t6n City Clerk's ()ffice, (425r430"6510~ •. A Public HearingwiU be held by the Henton ··Hearing E~amil1er in the ~oun~il Chambers on the seventh. floor of ,City Hall, 1055 South'G~adyWay,'Renton,Washlngton;-on~anuary11, 2005 at '9:00 AM to' consider the Site Plahand Conditual.Use Permit. The applicant orrepresentative(s)of the applicant is required to be present althe pu6lichearing~ A copy of the staff rE3Port~will be mailed to . you cirieweek betoreJhe hearing. If the Environm~nta(Oet,erminati()h jsappealed,ttieappeal will be heard as pcirtof this public hearing. .' · ..: '-..' " .". . The preceding information will assist you in planning for implementation of your projeCt and enable you to" exercise your appeal rights more fully, if you choose to do so. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at (425) 430-7382. For the .Environmental Review ComfTlittee, h~ Susan A. Fiala Senior Planner cc: Robert T. Cooper, Donald C. Erue, MaryBrown, Bruce & Cathy Pope / Parties of Record Parks ide at 95 Burnett, LLC / Owner Enclosure -------------lO-5-5-S-ou-th-·~G-m~d-y-W-ay---R-e-n~to-n-,W-a-s-hl-.n-gt-on--9-80-5-5------------~ ® This paper contains 50% recycled material, 30% post consumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor December 9, 2004 . Washington State Department of Ecology Envi ron ITl ental Review SeCtion· ·'·PO Box 47703 . Olympia,WA 985d4~7703 CITY.FRENTQN PlanningIBtiildinglPublic Works Departmellt· Gregg Zimmermim P.E~, Administrator. Subject: Environmental Determinations . . . Transmittedh~rewith is a copy of the .Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on December 7, 2004: .. .' DETERMINATION OF NON~SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGAT'ED PROJECT NAME: ' PROJECT NUMBER: LOCATION: DESCRIPTION: Parkside,at. 95. Burnett LUA04-133,SA-H, ECF, CU-H ·77& 95 BurriettAvenueS " .' The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review, Hearing Examiner Site Plan: and Hearing' Examiner Conditional Use approval for· a 147,4~0 sq. ft. multi familYresidential'developl11ent. The !>,iteis 0.83 acres in.size and is relatively flat withn(), kn,own critical areas. The project ... would include, 106 dwellingunits,.indaor.'exercise, room, c()mmori areas 'and seriiice,areas. with,in:siX bUilding'levels inchidingfourresidential,and ' . twC) levelli()f:str~£tl.II;.edpar!<ingof which once level would beoolow grade ... ,.enofthE!m'ulti,f~r,nily, unit'i(would~be town,house style and ·front directly., ontoBur~~tt'Av~.:So;:The:reinainirig ·niulti family units·\,\/ould be setback , framthe street.T~e's~riJctur'edparkinggarage ~ould inchide181 parking stalls· of which 46 would be t~ndem~ The applicant is .requestirig a.· conditional, us~,;,permit.in,:order ,toillcrease the density above, the :., maxinllim of· the CD· zone. The' slJbjectprop~rty, is ··Iocated within the 'CentE!rDowntown (CD) zoning deSignation, Downtown Core and Urban Center Design Ove~layDistrict A: ' Appeals of the environmental. determimitio~~ust be. filed .. in writing on or before 5:00 PM. on December 27, 2004. Appeals must. be filed' in. writing. together .withtherequired $75.00 ~ppliGatiQn fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Rentori,1 055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055: Appeals to the . Examiner are. governed by City of Henton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.R Additional information ' regarding the appeal. pr~Ges's may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office; (425)' 430"6510. If you have questions, please call me at (425) 430~7382. Susan A. Fiala Senior Planner cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division' WDFW, Stewart Reinbold David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources WSDOT, Northwest Region Duwamish Tribal Office Rod Malcom, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (Ordinance) ~ .J:F:;10.u..C;u..lol:;sUJIICLtleL.----1-O-S-,-S-S-o-u-th-G-ra-d-y-W:-a-y---R-en-t-on-,-W.-a-s-h-in-g-to-n-9-8-0-SS--------R E N TON * This paper contains 50% recyded material. 30% post consumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA04-133, SA-H, ECF, CU-H PROJECT NAME: Parks ide at 95 Burnett Avenue S APPLICANT: Parkside at 95 Burnett Avenue, LLC LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 77 & 95 Burnett Avenue S DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review, Hearing Examiner Site Plan and Hearing Examiner Conditional Use approval for a 147,430 sq. ft. multi family residential development. The site is 0.83 acres in size and is relatively flat with no known critical areas. The project would include 106 dwelling units, indoor exercise room, common areas and service areas within six building levels including four residential, and two levels of structured parking of which one level would be below grade. Ten of the multi family units would be townhouse style and front directly onto Burnett Ave. So. The remaining multi family units would be setback from the street. The structured parking garage would include 181 parking stalls of which 46 would be tandem. The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit in order to increase the density above the maximum of the CD zone. The subject property is located within the Center Downtown (CD) zoning designation, Downtown Core and Urban Center Design Overlay District A. LEAD AGENCY: MITIGATION MEASURES: The City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section 1. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations contained in the Geotechnical Engineering Study, dated September 29, 2004, regarding "Seismic Considerations" and "General Earthwork and Structural Fill". The satisfaction of this requirement shall be reviewed and approved by Development Services during construction, utility work and building construction. 2. The project shall be required to be designed and comply with the Department of Ecology's (DOE) Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements, outlined in Volume II of the 2001 Stormwater Management Manual. 3. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee based on a rate of $388.00 per multi family unit. The fee shall be at the time of building permit issuance. 4. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Transportation Mitigation Fee based on 292 new (net) trips at $75.00 per each new average daily trip associated with the project. The fee shall be paid at the time of building permit issuance. 5. In the event that archaeological deposits are found during construction, work shall stop and the contractor(s) shall contact the State Archaeologist at the State of Washington Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, phone (360) 586-3065. 6. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Parks Mitigation Fee based on $354.51 per new unit. The fee is to be paid at the time of building permit issuance. CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA04-133, SA-H, ECF, CU-H PROJECT NAME: Parks ide at 95 Burnett Avenue S APPLICANT: Parks ide at 95 Burnett Avenue, LLC LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 77 & 95 Burnett Avenue S DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review, Hearing Examiner Site Plan and Hearing Examiner Conditional Use approval for a 147,430 sq. ft. multi family residential development. The site is 0.83 acres in size and is relatively flat with no known critical areas. The project would include 106 dwelling units, indoor exercise room, common areas and service areas within six building levels including four residential, and two levels of structured parking of which one level would be below grade. Ten of the multi family units would be townhouse style and front directly onto Burnett Ave. So. The remaining multi family units would be setback from the street. The structured parking garage would include 181 parking stalls of which 46 would be tandem. The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit in order to increase the density above the maximum of the CD zone. The subject property is located within the Center Downtown (CD) zoning designation, Downtown Core and Urban Center Design Overlay District A. LEAD AGENCY: The City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Planning 1. RMC 4-4-075. E., Exterior Onsite Lighting standards: No use or activity shall cause light trespass beyond the boundaries of the property lines. All building lights shall be directed on to the building itself or the ground immediately abutting to it. The light emissions shall not be visible above the roofline of the building. Parking lot or display lot light fixtures shall be non-glare and mounted no more than 25 feet above the ground to minimize the impact onto adjacent and abutting properties. All fixtures shall be fitted with a cutoff type luminaire. 2. Commercial, multi-family, new single family and other nonresidential construction activities shall be restricted to the hours between 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays shall be restricted to the hours between 9:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. No work shall be permitted on Sundays. 3. In a 9/24/2004 site investigation prepared by SAIC for the Chevron USA, adjacent to park property and north of subject site, has both soil and water contamination exceeding MTCA Method A. Monitoring wells have been installed on Park property to monitor downstream contamination. Construction Services 1. The soils report recommendations shall be followed. 2. The elevator lobby shall meet the IBC (707.14) for separation. Fire 1. The preliminary fire flow is 4,000 gpm, one hydrant is required within 150 feet of the structure and three (3) additional hydrants are required within 300 feet of the structure. 2. Separate plans and permits are required for the installation of fire alarm, fire sprinkler and fire standpipe systems. Plan Review -Surface Water/Stolll) Drainage 1. System Development Charges have been paid in full. No additional fee is owed. 2. No water quality treatment is required. No detention calculations are required for this project. 3. A drainage report has been submitted and is currently under review. 4. Temporary erosion control shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the utility inspector for the duration of the project. Certification of the installation, maintenance and proper removal of the erosion control facilities is required prior to Temporary Certificate of Occupancy. Plan Review -Water 1. The System Development Charges shall be $7,745.75. (The rate is $0.213 x 36,365 square feet). This fee is payable with the construction permit. A redevelopment credit will apply for prior water service connections to this site. 2. Preliminary fire flow is 4,000 gpm. To meet this requirement applicant will require 4 hydrants. The two existing hydrants on the 8-inch will be counted and 2 additional hydrants will be required to be installed on the 24 -inch water main in Burnett. Existing hydrants shall be retrofitted with Storz "quick disconnect" fittings if not already in place. 3. A fire sprinkler system is required. Separate plans and utility permit for the installation of the Double Detector Check Valve Assembly will be required. All devices installed shall be per the latest Department of Health "Approved List" of Backflow Prevention Devices. Civil plans must show location of device. For DDCVA installations inside the building, applicant shall submit a copy of the mechanical plan showing the location and installation of the backflow assembly inside the mechanical room. Installation shall be in accordance with the City of Renton's requirements. DDCVA shall be installed immediately after the pipe has passed through the building floor slab. Installation of devices shall be in the horizontal position only. 4. Buildings that exceed 30 feet in height will require a backflow device to be installed on domestic water meter. Include note on the civil plan. 5. Landscape irrigation systems will require a separate permit for the irrigation meter and approved backflow device is required to be installed. A plumbing permit will be required. Plan Review - Sanitary Sewer 1. The Sanitary System Development Charge is $ 4,581.99. (The rate is $ 0.126 x 36,365 square feet). This fee is payable with the construction permit. A redevelopment credit will apply for previous sewer service connections to this site. 2. The building department will require floor drains in the parking garage. The system shall be connected to the sanitary sewer. Flows shall be directed through floor drains that are installed in accordance with the UPC to an exterior oil/water separator whenever possible. The separator shall be sized to meet a minimum 15- minute retention time for peak flows anticipated in the garage area, but in no case will be less than 200 gallons of storage capacity. The type of interceptor shall be as manufactured by Pipe Inc., Utility Vault Inc., or approved equal. 3. Existing septic systems shall be abandoned in accordance with King County Health. Plan Review -Street Improvements 1. A street lighting plan is required to be provided. 2. Half street improvements including sidewalk, curb, gutter, storm drainage and paving are required to be installed per City code fronting the site in Burnett Ave S. 3. A traffic study has been submitted and is currently under review. Plan Review -General 1. All plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. 2. All required utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed Civil Engineer. 3. When plans are complete three copies of the drawings, two copies of the drainage report, a construction estimate and application fee shall be submitted at the sixth floor counter. A fee worksheet is attached for your use, but prior to prepal" Ig a check it is recommended to call 4~v 430-7266 for a fee estimate as generated by the permit system. 4. Separate permits for side sewers, water meters, irrigation meters and backflow devices are required. 5. A separate permit to cut and cap existing utilities to existing structures on site will be required as part of the demolition permit. 6. A traffic control plan shall be submitted for approval prior to any permit being issued. 7. A construction plan indicating haul route and hours, construction hours and a traffic control plan shall be submitted for approval prior to any permit being issued. Haul hours shall be restricted to 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. unless approved in advance by the Development Services Division. CITY OF RENTON \ DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-04-133, SA-H, ECF, CU-H APPLICANT: Parkside at 95 Burnett LLC PROJECT NAME: Parkside at 95 Burnett DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review, Hearing Examiner Site Plan and Hearing Examiner Conditional Use approval for a 147,430 sq. ft. multi family residential development. The site is 0.83 acres in size and is relatively flat with no known critical areas. The project would include 106 dwelling units, indoor exercise room, common areas and service areas within six building levels including four residential, and two levels of structured parking of which one level would be below grade. Ten of the multi family units would be townhouse style and front directly onto Burnett Ave. So. The remaining multi family units would be setback from the street. The structured parking garage would include 181 parking stalls of which 46 would be tandem. The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit in order to increase the density above the maximum of the CD zone. The subject property is located within the Center Downtown (CD) zoning designation, Downtown Core and Urban Center Design Overlay District A. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: LEAD AGENCY: 77 and 95 Burnett Ave. South The City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on December 27, 2004. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-651 O. PUBLICATION DATE: DATE OF DECISION: SIGNATURES: Dennis Culp, Administr or Community Services "~~ Lee e er, Ire Chief Renton Fire Department DECEMBER 13, 2004 DECEMBER 7, 2004 DATE To: From: ;;M~~titi: .. ·'Tj'm~:;:,;:: ... , .. , . ·· .... ,.E;~MI:i·~~MENm:· .... ·REVIE:WGOMM,ITIEE:,·.··· ....... .... ... ·'·:·">";'M·elti"lNci.'NoTlcE .... ""'I,:'~""":"(j~:gE3:rnber:"i,'i:g'o'64 Gregg Zimmerman, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator Dennis Culp, Community Services Administrator Lee Wheeler, Fire Chief Jennifer Henning, Development Planning . ... : ....... :.,":: .... : -:"--:-:.-:'" .. " .... ,':: ... -.:.-.... :.: ........ , ..... , .. :.:.' .-.... ".: -:::,".:.'\:.-: ·y:~§·aa.~,i~:~'~~"fTit'Jer'~\:,~2Q04:i' ""(;',,/.;:,';':''': .. "", ,,9;,QQ:AM Agenda listed below. Ridgeview Court Preliminary Plat (Wei/) LUA04-131, PP, SA-H, ECF The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review, Hearing Examiner Site Plan and Preliminary Plat approvals and a code modification for cul-de-sac radius. The proposal is to subdivide the 2.4-acre site into 20 lots for the eventual development of single-family dwellings. The lots range in size from 2,725 sq. ft. to 5,831 sq. ft. Access is proposed via improved Bremerton Avenue NE to a new public street terminating in a cul-de-sac. Further access will be provided by private easements. The site has been shown not to contain any protected Critical Areas. The site is zoned Center Suburban (CS) and is located in the Centers Residential Bonus District B. Parkside at 95 Burnett (Fiala) LUA04-133, SA-H, CU-H, ECF The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review, Hearing Examiner Site Plan and Hearing Examiner Conditional Use approval for a 147,430 sq. ft. multi family residential development. The site is 0.83 acres in size and is relatively flat with no known critical areas. The project would include 106 dwelling units, indoor exercise room, common areas and service areas within six building levels including four residential, and two levels of structured parking of which one level would be below grade. Ten of the multi family units would be townhouse style and front directly onto Burnett Ave. So. The remaining multi family units would be setback from the street. The structured parking garage would include 181 parking stalls of which 46 would be tandem. The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit in order to increase the density above the maximum of the CD zone. The subject property is located within the Center Downtown (CD) zoning designation, Downtown Core and Urban Center Design Overlay District A. Sixth Street Short Plat (Fiala) LUA04-139, SHPL-H, V-H, LLA, ECF The applicant is requesting a Lot Line Adjustment, Environmental Review, Hearing Examiner Short Plat and Hearing Examiner Variances for a seven lot subdivision of a 1.84 acre site (after lot line adjustment). Additional requests include: modifications of street standards to allow a dead-end street greater than 700 ft and to allow a private street to serve more than six lots. The variances would be from the R-8 required 20 ft. front yard setback for Lots 3, 4, 5 and 6. A separate request for vacating a portion of a public walkway would also be made by the applicant. The lot sizes range from 4,552 sq. ft. to 24,815 sq. ft. (gross area). The site is located at the end of a sub-standard dead-end street of which the cul-de- sac would be enlarged to meet code. A 30 ft. wide private access easement would extend to the east and south of the re- constructed cul-de-sac to access the lots. Partial relocation of existing city utilities and new underground utilities are included. Steep slopes (classified as protected slopes of 40 percent or greater in grade) exist as well as a portion of a Category 3 wetland and associated buffer. Approximately 2,000 cubic yards of topsoil would be removed for re-use and 5,000 cy of imported fill is proposed. cc: K. Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor J. Covington, Chief Administrative Officer A Pietsch, EDNSP Administrator ® B. Wolters, EDNSP Director ® J. Gray, Fire Prevention N. Watts, PIBIPW Development Services Director ® F. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner S. Engler, Fire Prevention ® J. Medzegian, Council S. Meyer, PIBIPW Transportation Systems Director R. Lind, Economic Development L. Warren, City Attorney ® STAFF REPORT A. BACKGROUND ERC MEETING DA TE Project Name: Owners/Applicants: Contact: File Number: Project Description: Project Location: Exist. Bldg. Area: Site Area: RECOMMENDA TlON: Project Location Map \ City of Renton Department of Planning / Building / Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE December 7,2004 Parks ide at 95 Burnett Parkside at 95 Burnett LLC 2256 38th PL E. Seattle, WA 98112 Kent Smutny, TSA Architects, PLLC 50 116th Ave. SE, Ste. 201 Bellevue, WA 98004 LUA-04-133, SA-H, ECF, CU-H Project Manager: Susan Fiala, AICP The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review, Hearing Examiner Site Plan and Hearing Examiner Conditional Use approval for a 147,430 sq. ft. multi family residential development. The site is 0.83 acres in size and is relatively flat with no known critical areas. The project would include 106 dwelling units, indoor exercise room, common areas and service areas within six building levels including four residential, and two levels of structured parking of which one level would be below grade. Ten of the multi family units would be townhouse style and front directly onto Burnett Ave. So. The remaining multi family units would be setback from the street. The structured parking garage would include 181 parking stalls of which 46 would be tandem. The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit in order to increase the density above the maximum of the CD zone. The subject property is located within the Center Downtown (CD) zoning deSignation, Downtown Core and Urban Center Design Overlay District A. Continued on next page. 77 and 95 Burnett Ave. South Vacant Proposed New Bldg. Area: 147,430 sq. ft. 0.83 acres (gross) Total Building Area gsf: 147,430 sq. ft. Staff recommends that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Non-Significance -Mitigated (DNS-M). City of Renton PIBIPW Oeparlment PARKSIDE A T 95 BURNETT REPORT OF DECEMBER 7, 2004 PROJECT DESCRIPTION CONTINUED: Envl 'TIental Review Committee Staff Reporl LUA-04-133, SA-H, ECF, CU-H Page 20'7 The site, comprised of two parcels, is vacant. Previously the site included the Lande Feed Company, Northwest Pneumatic Electrical Repair and the Purcell Painting and Canber Corp. all of which have been demolished. The new six story multi family building would contain 106 dwelling units and 181 structured parking spaces. Four levels of the building would cOhtain the residential component and two levels would contain the parking stalls, one level of parking would be below grade. Ten of the dwelling units would be townhouse type units fronting Burnett Ave. So. The remaining 96 units would be stepped back from the street frontage. The four residential levels would contain 24 units per floor and include studios, one, two and three bedroom units. The two level parking garage would be accessed from Burnett Ave. South. Each parking level would have a separate entry at the far north and south ends of the building. The total structure would be approximately 68 feet high. The site is located in the Center Downtown (CD) zoning deSignation which permits a density up to 100 dwelling units per acre and up to 150 dulac with a conditional use permit. The proposed density would be 127 dulac which requires a conditional use permit, to be reviewed by the Hearing Examiner. The site is also within the Downtown Core and Urban Design Overlay District A. B. RECOMMENDA TlON Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINA TlON OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Issue DNS with 14 da A eal Period. Issue DNS with 15 day Comment Period with Concurrent 14 day Appeal Period. C. MITIGA TION MEASURES DETERMINATION OF XX NON -SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGA TED. xx Issue DNS-M with 14 da A eal Period. Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period with Concurrent 14 day Appeal Period. 1. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations contained in the Geotechnical Engineering Study, dated September 29, 2004, regarding "Seismic Considerations" and "General Earthwork and Structural Fill". The satisfaction of this requirement shall be reviewed and approved by Development Services during construction, utility work and building construction. 2. The project shall be required to be designed and comply with the Department of Ecology's (DOE) Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements, outlined in Volume II of the 2001 Stormwater Management Manual. 3. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee based on a rate of $388.00 per multi family unit. The fee shall be at the time of building permit issuance. 4. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Transportation Mitigation Fee based on 292 new (net) trips at $75.00 per each new average daily trip associated with the project. The fee shall be paid at the time of building permit issuance. 5. In the event that archaeological deposits are found during construction, work shall stop and the contractor(s) shall contact the State Archaeologist at the State of Washington Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, phone (360) 586-3065. 6. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Parks Mitigation Fee based on $354.51 per new unit. The fee is to be paid at the time of building permit issuance. erc_95Burnelt.doc City of Renton PIBIPW Department PARKS/DE A T 95 BURNETT REPORT OF DECEMBER 7. 2004 Advisory Notes to Applicant: Env; '!len tal Review Committee Staff Report I LUA-04-133, SA~H, ECF, CU-H Page 30'7 The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Planning 1. RMC 4-4-075. E., Exterior Onsite Lighting standards: No use or activity shall cause light trespass beyond the boundaries of the property lines. All building lights shall be directed on to the building itself or the ground immediately abutting to it. The light emissions shall not be visible above the roofline of the building. Parking lot or display lot light fixtures shall be non-glare and mounted no more than 25 feet above the ground to minimize the impact onto adjacent and abutting properties. All fixtures shall be fitted with a cutoff type luminaire. 2. Commercial, multi-family, new single family and other nonresidential construction activities shall be restricted to the hours between 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays shall be restricted to the hours between 9:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. No work shall be permitted on Sundays. 3. In a 9/24/2004 site investigation prepared by SAIC for the Chevron USA, adjacent to park property and north of subject site, has both soil and water contamination exceeding MTCA Method A. Monitoring wells have been installed on Park property to monitor downstream contamination. Construction Services 1. The soils report recommendations shall be followed. 2. The elevator lobby shall meet the IBC (707.14) for separation. Fire 1. The preliminary fire flow is 4,000 gpm, one hydrant is required within 150 feet of the structure and three (3) additional hydrants are required within 300 feet of the structure. 2. Separate plans and permits are required for the installation of fire alarm, fire sprinkler and fire standpipe systems. Plan Review -Surface Water/Storm Drainage 1. System Development Charges have been paid in full. No additional fee is owed. 2. No water quality treatment is required. No detention calculations are required for this project. 3. A drainage report has been submitted and is currently under review. 4. Temporary erosion control shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the utility inspector for the duration of the project. Certification of the installation, maintenance and proper removal of the erosion control facilities is required prior to Temporary Certificate of Occupancy. Plan Review -Water 1. The System Development Charges shall be $7,745.75. (The rate is $0.213 x 36,365 square feet). This fee is payable with the construction permit. A redevelopment credit will apply for prior water service connections to this site. 2. Preliminary fire flow is 4,000 gpm. To meet this requirement applicant will require 4 hydrants. The two existing hydrants on the 8-inch will be counted and 2 additional hydrants will be required to be installed on the 24 -inch water main in Burnett. EXisting hydrants shall be retrofitted with Storz "quick disconnect" fittings if not already in place. 3. A fire sprinkler system is required. Separate plans and utility permit for the installation of the Double Detector Check Valve Assembly will be required. All devices installed shall be per the latest Department of Health "Approved List" of Backflow Prevention Devices. Civil plans must show location of device. For DDCVA installations inside the building, applicant shall submit a copy of the mechanical plan showing the location and installation of the backflow assembly inside the mechanical room. Installation shall be in accordance with the City of Renton's requirements. DDCVA shall be installed immediately after the pipe has passed through the building floor slab. Installation of devices shall be in the horizontal position only. 4. Buildings that exceed 30 feet in height will require a backflow device to be installed on domestic water-meter. Include note on the civil plan. 5. Landscape irrigation systems will require a separate permit for the irrigation meter and approved backflow device is required to be installed. A plumbing permit will be required. Plan Review -Sanitary Sewer 1. The Sanitary System Development Charge is $ 4,581.99. (The rate is $ 0.126 x 36,365 square feet). This fee is payable with the construction permit. A redevelopment credit will apply for previous sewer service connections to this site. 2. The building department will require floor drains in the parking garage. The system shall be connected to the ere _ 958urnett.doc City of Renton PIBIPW Department PARKS/DE AT 95 BURNETT Env; 71enta/ Review Committee Staff Report , LUA-04-133, SA-H, ECF, CU-H REPORT OF DECEMBER 7, 2004 Page 40'7 sanitary sewer. Flows shall be directed through floor drains that are installed in accordance with the UPC to an exterior oil/water separator whenever possible. The separator shall be sized to meet a minimum 15-minute retention time for peak flows anticipated in the garage area, but in no case will be less than 200 gallons of storage capacity. The type of interceptor shall be as manufactured by Pipe Inc., Utility Vault Inc., or approved equal. 3. Existing septic systems shall be abandoned in accordance with King County Health. Plan Review -Street Improvements 1. A street lighting plan is required to be provided. 2. Half street improvements including sidewalk, curb, gutter, storm drainage and paving are required to be installed per City code fronting the site in Burnett Ave S. 3. A traffic study has been submitted and is currently under review. Plan Review -General 1. All plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. 2. All required utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed Civil Engineer. 3. When plans are complete three copies of the drawings, two copies of the drainage report, a construction estimate and application fee shall be submitted at the sixth floor counter. A fee worksheet is attached for your use, but prior to preparing a check it is recommended to call 425-430-7266 for a fee estimate as generated by the permit system. 4. Separate permits for side sewers, water meters, irrigation meters and backflow devices are required. 5. A separate permit to cut and cap existing utilities to existing structures on site will be required as part of the demolition permit. 6. A traffic control plan shall be submitted for approval prior to any permit being Issued. 7. A construction plan indicating haul route and hours, construction hours and a traffic control plan shall be submitted for approval prior to any permit being issued. Haul hours shall be restricted to 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. unless a roved in advance b the Develo ment Services Division. D. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS In compliance with RCW 43.21 C. 240, the following project environmental review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. 1. Earth Impacts: The applicant submitted a Geotechnical Engineering Study prepared by Geotech Consultants, Inc., dated September 29, 2004. The study investigated soil conditions and provided recommendations for general earthwork, foundations, retaining walls and temporary shoring for the proposed apartment building. . The subject site can be described as flat, with little to no slope. The environmental checklist states that excavation would occur below the existing grade for underground parking level. The amount of soil to be excavated for the underground parking level is estimated at 4,560 cubic yards and be exported from the site. The sub-surface exploration borings encountered loose fill and alluvium overlying medium-dense sands and gravelly sands. The loose soils are highly compressible and are potentially liquefiable below the water table. To prevent unacceptable foundation settlement under static building loads, and in the event of a moderate to large earthquake, the geotech study recommends that the proposed building be supported on deep foundations embedded into dense, native soils. Due to the presence of potentially caving near-surface soils and groundwater, augercast piers would be the most suitable deep foundation option. Staff recommends that the applicant follows the recommendations as contained in the geotech report concerning "Seismic Considerations". Groundwater seepage was observed at a depth of 8 to 17 feet. The borings were left open for only a short period of time. Groundwater levels encountered during drilling can be deceptive, because seepage into the boring can be blocked or slowed by the auger itself. Based on their observations, the regional water table found throughout downtown Renton was at a depth of 13 to 15 feet below the existing grade at the time of the borings. The use of sumps during construction may be necessary, depending on the rate of groundwater seepage entering excavations. The report continues to state that the area around the subject site is underlain by soft compressible soils. Strong ground vibrations should be avoided to reduce the risk of settlement in surrounding on-grade elements, including ere _ 958urnett.doe City of Renton PIBIPW Department PARKSIDE AT 95 BURNETT REPORT OF DECEMBER 7, 2004 Env: {Iental Review Committee Staff Report LUA-04-133, SA-H, ECF, CU-H Page 50'7 slabs, walkways, planters, etc. The general and earthwork contractors should be made aware of this concern. The report states that large vibratory compactors should not be used at the site. Regardless of these measures, a potential for neighbors to claim that settlement or damages of this new work could occur. The geotech consultant recommends two specific measures to follow to address unsubstantiated claims from surrounding property owners that include: • Prior to construction, an extensive photographic and visual survey of the project vicinity should be completed. This documents the condition of buildings, pavements, and utilities in the immediate vicinity of the site. . • Adjacent on~grade elements and foundation should be monitored during construction to detect soil movements. These measures appear to be for the owner to safeguard themselves, however, staff does recommend, as a mitigation measure that to address the moisture sensitive soils and settlement that the applicant following the recommendations as contained in the geotech report concerning "General Earthwork and Structural Fill". The site is located within the Seismic Zone 3. Under the 2003 IBC, the site class would be D. The loose soils beneath the water table are potentially susceptible to seismic liquefaction during a moderate to large earthquake. The use of deep foundations to support the building should mitigate the risk of catastrophic foundation settlement that could result from seismic liquefaction. As stated earlier, staff recommends as a mitigation measure that the building be designed and constructed utilizing a deep foundation system (augercast piers). In order to reduce the potential for erosion and control sedimentation to the site and to adjacent properties, staff recommends additional mitigation including that the project be designed and comply with the Department of Ecology's (DOE) Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements, outlined in Volume" of the 2001 Stormwater Management Manual. . Mitigation Measures: • The applicant shall comply with the recommendations contained in the Geotechnical Engineering Study, dated September 29, 2004, regarding "Seismic Considerations" and "General Earthwork and Structural Fill". The satisfaction of this requirement shall be reviewed and approved by Development Services during construction, utility work and building construction. • The project shall be required to be designed and comply with the Department of Ecology's (DOE) Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements, outlined in Volume" of the 2001 Stormwater Management Manual. Policy Nexus: SEPA Environmental Regulations. 2. Surface Water Impacts: The applicant submitted a Preliminary Drainage Report prepared by Site Development Associates, LLC, dated October 5,2004, with the land use application. The report indicates that two existing storm catch basins located in Burnett Ave. So. will need to be relocated as part of the infrastructure improvements. Detention and water quality are not proposed for the project. Detention is not proposed because the existing site was almost entirely impervious. In addition, the site is about 425 feet from the discharge point at the Cedar River, which is under the y., mile distance threshold for detention. Water quality is not proposed because all parking, which is the only pollution generating surface, would be fully enclosed and drainage would be collected for floor drains collecting the sanitary sewer system in Burnett Ave. South. The downstream analysis indicates that the storm system that the project would drain to runs north for 250 feet along Burnett, then turns east for 125 feet along an access drive south of the Williams Condominium complex. At Williams Ave., the storm system turns north and runs 50 feet where it is assumed that it daylights to the Cedar River. Staff is reviewing the preliminary drainage report and has indicated that the applicant appears to have addressed the core requirements of the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM). Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation is recommended. Policy Nexus: N/A erC_95Burnett.doc City of Renton PIBIPW Department PARKS/DE AT 95 BURNETT REPORT OF DECEMBER 7, 2004 3. . Fire Protection Env' '1lental Review Committee Staff Report . LUA-04-133, SA-H, ECF, CU-H Page 60(7 Impacts: The proposal would construct 106 multi family dwelling units which would potentially impact the City's Fire Emergency Services. A Fire Mitigation Fee based on a rate of $388.00 per new dwelling unit will be required. The fee is estimated at $41,128.00 and is be payable prior at the time of issuance of building permits. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee based on a rate of $388.00 per multi family unit. The fee shall be at the time of building permit issuance. Policy Nexus: SEPA Environmental Regulations; Fire Mitigation Fee Resolution No. 2913, Ordinance 4527. 4. AccesslTransportation Impacts: Two driveways accessing the site are proposed along Burnett Ave. South located at the north and south most areas of the building street frontage. A Traffic Impact Analysis was submitted by the applicant as prepared by Jake Traffic Engineering (JTE) Inc., dated September 10,2004. The report reviewed existing conditions and projected Level of Service (LOS) conditions at year 2009. The intersections evaluated for the proposed development included Burnett Ave. South and South 2nd St. and So. 3rd St. and site access intersections. All street intersections near the subject site would maintain a LOS C or better with the project as projected for future 2009 conditions. The site access driveways are expected to operate at LOS A for the all turn movements. The proposal would result in an increase in traffic trips to the City's street system. The proposed project is expected to generate 641 new average daily trips. The previous site development was documented to generate 349 daily trips for a net trip of 292 daily trips. Staff recommends a Transportation Mitigation Fee be imposed on the project. The Transportation Mitigation Fee is based on a rate of $75.00 per new average daily trip generated by the project. Credit for existing trips generated by the former uses on the site would be applied. The fee is estimated at $21,900.00 ($75.00 x (641-349 = 292) trips = $21,900.00). The fee is payable at time of building permit issuance. The Renton Transit Center is located south of South 2nd Street which is about '!.4mile to the south of the subject project which is within walking distance of the proposed project. Mitigation Measures: • The applicant shall pay the appropriate Transportation Mitigation Fee based on 292 new (net) trips at $75.00 per each new average daily trip associated with the project. Credit given for the former land uses. The fee shall be paid at the time of building permit issuance. Policy Nexus: SEPA Environmental Regulations; Transportation Mitigation Fee Resolution No. 3100, Ordinance 4527. 5. Archaeological and Cultural Resources Impacts: A Cultural Resources Assessment was prepared by Northwest Archaeological Associates (NWAA) , Inc. and dated October 21, 2004. Due to the site's location in a high-probability area for cultural resources near the confluence of the Cedar and Black Rivers, the assessment was required as part of the land use application. The current Cedar River is about 700 ft. to the northeast and the former channel of the Black River (now buried under Lake Ave. So.) is several hundred feet west of the study area. The report indicated that prior to site investigation, NWAA searched archival materials at the Washington Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (OAHP) in Olympia for information on previously recorded sites and reports of investigations. The field work was conducted by two archaeologists on September 15 and 16, 2004. Fifteen backhoe trenches and 16 shovel probes were excavated at 20 -meter intervals across the site. The finds produced demolition fill across the parcel including milled lumber, wood planking, bricks, concrete, coal and so on. The fill was about two feet in depth. The investigation revealed that no intact cultural resources were present on site that would be affected by the proposed development. However, the report concluded that the project setting and similarity of the depositional sequence to that of nearby excavated sites suggest moderate potential for resources to be found during the project construction. erc_95Burnett.doc City of Renton PIBIPW Department PARKS/DE A T 95 BURNETT En Vi .. '1lental Review Committee Staff Report LUA-04-133, SA-H, ECF, CU-H REPORT OF DECEMBER 7, 2004 Page 70(7 . In the event any potential cultural resources are found during excavation/construction, the contractor will be instructed to stop work and contact the appropriate local and state officials and follow established protocol for culturally significant resource finds. Mitigation Measures: In the event that archaeological deposits are found during construction, work shall stop and the contractor(s) shall contact the State Archaeologist at the State of Washington Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, phone (360) 586-3065. Policy Nexus: SEPA Environmental Regulations 6. Parks & Recreation Impacts: The proposal does not provide sufficient on-site recreation areas for future residents of the proposed project. There are existing recreational facilities in the area of the subject property (e.g., Jones Park and The Cedar River Trail) and it is anticipated that the proposed development would generate future demand on existing City parks and recreational facilities and programs. Therefore, staff recommends that the applicant be required to pay a Parks Mitigation Fee based on $354.51 per each new unit. The fee is estimated at $37,578.06 (106 new units x $354.51 = $37,578.06) and is payable at the time of building permit issuance. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall pay the appropriate Parks Mitigation Fee based on $354.51 per new unit. The fee is to be paid at the time of building permit issuance. Policy Nexus: SEPA Environmental Regulations; Parks Mitigation Fee Resolution No. 3082, Ordinance 4527. 7. Air/Noise Impacts: During project construction, vehicle and construction equipment emissions and dust will potentially be released. These impacts would be short-term limited to the construction phase of the project. The applicant would be required to submit a Construction Mitigation Plan, which would include measures to minimize construction impacts. Construction equipment noise would be mitigated by muffling equipment as required per standard construction standards and dust would be controlled using best management construction practices. The noise impacts are not considered significant due to the limited duration of the construction period and existing code provisions, which restrict construction hours and equipment noises. The noise standards would be required to be in compliance with both the City of Renton and the Washington State standards. If pile driving is used, additional environmental review may be required. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation is recommended. Policy Nexus: N/A E. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS The proposal has been circulated to City Departmental/Divisional Reviewers for their review. Where applicable, these comments have been incorporated into the text of this report as Mitigation Measures and/or Notes to Applicant. ~ Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. Environmental Determination Appeal Process Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM December 27, 2004. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. erc_95Bumett.doc z :5 II. W l-e;; ~~. ;:q. "I?J~· .. :: =;: cO:' " :~I~;: ; ;.~ ':ii" ;. (', . '''"'SEC: 17., T, 23 N., R.j6E, W.M. ~. - ~.~~ (;; ;~~ ~y.1 ~~: ~i {~ C' '.~ ~ .,:.-' 111I11111;l • ,ll I ~ .. • ~ Q ~z « ~~ j~ b~ P. , I / ". , . 1''' -RHO"' .... "." 'I • • -------------7/,;~-~~ ~~~~_{_:t----~--_,·-f ---/!......----;;-~ ... ,' --.... id: 2;:;;i:;J~----gu~ANo :---;·I-=r=--:----------------.~ m __ •• _ --.' -/ r1J Ii!'">A!r-..,-r / ~~~ 6!~ .P-:::N' Ultq 'SviJiH I, ; I I ;' ! .• ~illl ~d '~lid; [:u,-;..: ::y' .. ~ -!.:"~ '" .: t~ ~@IC ~!I ~.J ..( ; i I'(II'I'I! I-:'~;~;~:~~i/ s '" " ' ... ! Dati: "'--- By: Dot,:. I IIIIII i IBy, 0.", L="'Sooo(lr!/lJll»<lflJ-""""., __ , '''_·''\I'I'y<I.\IJ'(1$ot_ .. ,aJ\rM_~'''''~~\I9__ .. _. !!" ~:.:~ :=t:, .. 00"""" EHCLOSURt: ;) i I /':"'1: /r l :,: ~l i~~: i~ I ... ' '''PROPOSED,BUiLDiNG "i' I . t.....m GARAOa '.'.:'41.0-LOWIR QARAQII ,.,,: aL.' i:X'.< ;i'il, eu/i.'.! N(: .,'.;' .'~~' ,.-':{.';'";:., .... ' :'VI; .;<,. 2" t./INC\.ASS"B-ASPHALT COHCRO'E PAVDlENT .-WIN CRUSHED SURfACING TOP COORS( 2-CRUSHED SURFACING 84SE COURSE , .. ",:" 'D:) ;/,";.';~; r· .. · )_ .. ED ~T?AD IMPROVEMENT SECTION ,-'.~::?/(.I:.';. L_ / :"' 'J ,( ~ I~,~I ~ PAVEMENT o ~~~ ~' ; ',I', ~\: I ... ,' >. % ~o 40 20~':' 0 ~::~ 1--20' '!,~ciC!lIe feet :i'";"' II !~f ! ii!l! mii! rl{ihl ~ ~i~1 ; ~i~~ ~ .... a; c: I-::::I co III z <i C» ~ ~ ~ :( ~ .; " iii I III "0 .;; ~ .>0: l-i CIS a.. " ~ ~IC2.01 I 200321 ~ · S .. gfJII J4!1/17/q GARAGE LEVEL 1 PLAN ~.; ,.:i",ii: ':->/3':;;;'~"i'<; rTr IE 1 .. ... __ =' D==U.C -Patksi~~at 95 Burnett ........ ':"::~ TSA'",;;"", '-" loOl1 ... A_l!I._.I ~~~<tU.tIH.tIUI ~~ i i.i ~ 1;2.111 iXOf21 ~ ______.-nL ..... - 000 , . i o i . . U '-'-- i i II g ! "'0 S» .... " en c: (J) S» .... (0 01 m c .... :::J (J) ... ... I ~ = .. Ul lap ~ r' j~r iii ;: c • ~ [I] ---0 ~-0 -~-0 ~-0 -------0 ---(0 ------0 --0 ---0 i f 0 p ~ ." \l) .... " (f) a: <D [I~ ~i m f!> ~, m l!'! ('J) ~I~ If-l -~---0 ~I m lim ql~ or I~ ---0 I~ I» i~ 10 ,0 -_.-0 Iz --0 I Z I i I ---0 ---0 I \l) ... , --~-0 <0 01 m c I ---0 -0 .., ::l <D ---0 -0 ::t -0 0 --0 0 I 0 .. -0 e .... en ~ lop 0 1M ~ el~ : ; ! ~ --0 I , SITE PlAN AEV1EW SUBMIITAL 10118/04 I] . , i i fl G "'tJ I» ... '7\ C/J a: CD I» -CD 01 m c: ... ::J CD ::t I Cil ~ I ai~ , t"l' ~ i~r , ,I~ ~ ; J ~ § ! . SITE PlAN REVIEW SUBMmAL 10118104 .. i z ~io ~i :0 -I -I ~I J: ~I m II 1m i< ,> 1-1 1-'0 Iz , ~) (:if 11;1-" '-' (:J... o (~) (-' " J '-' (:) ,,", ( ',) Cv 1,0 (0r' (~ ·S-a/l}/ .i..La;¥;t17C/ C<!j (D 8 (;) (;) -'-' (~) RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 1 PLAN ~."""L~, !~f!~:2" ,~" (;) c:) C~) ~~l ~~ (0.) Ev @ ~ ,(D , \(~) o ,-, \:') (~) (;-:-1 '-' () (;'l '-' :0 rJ::'i I I IE 1 --r I-~ II...;.~_=-P"rksi~a;t~~!lume~ .:..1 _l~:::. IA~31! II BURNETT AVENUE SOUTH / / i / / I ------------~ ____ --..I:!.QLJQ'41}J: ___ _ Wv ~ _______ ()d --~ -,...,... • ~ STREET LEVEL PLANT SCHEDULE _ ..... - ClllWll'l'OIMoUI ...... ~A.\UOMIIII' '"""" Co 'MUTcatAT' L~T.""""nH I"eHIr1II1P.\W'e.lI' _ .... ,........ ,."'-..... 11' ..... "'- 2' c;,1.ae.ar ..... .... ..wc:al.ae. ....... ..... la.t,WQl:. E'5] -""'- -0 0 ..... 0 -.. 9 ~ SUGGESTED CONTAINER PLANTS ...... -..... .............. """'_ ...... .....,.,..,=-0 '""'-""'" ....... _. ""'-........... ......... AICIR.JNICNC1I"IN.LrIC)Q/' ACIR.wataI1'C'.auL. ... • I ae QPIIIIIIIUIf1,~f' "'""""'IIHAX'Y!I.LDIi"" .... ~~'JMX ...... T' ...-.....-...... _-I ..... IBU'IWIIl'"liUlU'tlJI:1(' ...... _-_ .. """"""""- I4O&TA'ellllp.ICDT" I: -""""'" 1!lUON'W'I'Ie','It1IJLI,I.D1IIMITT" I· .... _ .... -. .... Design Two FourfTwo 51)(._ m 2UINOrtIIIIpWlY.SUIte215 1IeIIe¥ .... ,W .. 98004 "".(425)881-2426 IU (425) $7&-522g www.dtilgn24U.com BURNETT 95 Renton, WA ~~'UA "'" k"Pian • LANDSCAPE PLAN -t i1j--Lj----i • ~ I I seAL" ",,,' e L-l,O ~ ________________ ~l~_~ .~ If 4 BURNETI AVENUE SOUTH \~ 0 ~------"=' i , , , , , 8l ---- gl , , , , , , ~_~. __ .. ~. ___ . ___ J """"--~ _.""'" • -, ~ STREET LEVEL PLANT SCHEDULE ~, ..... """"""lILP_ ~I'QIITAIt ..... ~"'.IHIiINIMII' ,.,..c.'NIItTClQtI.T' ~t.~ ......",...,. ............ 2" c:.I. ... D'I'fIII."" ,.c:.L,ae,II'1'fIII.1L loWc:aI, ........ 1L 16II,W'O.t:. EJ -..-~ ....... SUGGESTED CONTAINER PLANTS """"--0 ...... -...... -ow._ ...... Ac:aJMllQrlCU1'N.L1't:Ot ....... -...... ACa.l.ll'OCl1'C:a101L ...... """""",...-~I"\.~T' <:) ..... ........-. 0 _ ......... """ -_ ............ ,.,\ ..... ............ """ 1"WCIII1U'I'ISWf'J.to::K",T' tM. ..-...-...... _....." II!CIt1V.'AInII'trIJqf' """"" -_ .... I ..... m _ .. ...... ...... """' ....... I ..... -......... .. !oICIfT""~ -I'm UU>._ .......... -I ..... II.ICIJrf'I1UP."""-'06.lPT' -.. .......... -..... ".,...'"' I ..... Design Two Four/Two Six" ... ~ Z$21NOrthuPWay,SuL~:U5 1Ie~,W"'98004 ",..(425)$81,2.26 ' .. ("15) 576-5129 _w.clnlgnl0426.com BURNETT 95 Renton, WA Do ..... T ..... -.... ---... ----------..oIl ...... -~ LANDSCAPE PLAN Lb· ~·~I :~~ 1I!Ir-! Scale 1" = 20' ----a 10 2'0 30 40 ~ :g TREE CONDITION EVALUATION AND IMPACT MAP Parkside at 95 Burnett Renton, WA \ ~" I /1t ~ ~ ~ BURNETT AVENUE SOU1'H 7\ ,e. ______ .. _~ ____ ._____ ,"'}(O':lrr c <) r==:II= II rLlbrulII(rldmap.) CVt.l_.C .. pt""lICy~til"yIoondi(LAylandCrP·"') PINI-I'InUlNII"I(AUllna"pjrNl PSWE.,..udot."",,"en,ie.iI(Oo,,,,,"'Ir) Qbb·0Ia .... 1 ... In~hel.t4.S·WIov'the.Qllinggr8de }1:Iglu.~pro.lm.t.bei;IItafl,..InI .. t ~I' . . . ~ I ~ Iill' ~. W ..... UIll t;rOWnlprladldrlphdilm_ infMl JJ:I(Lr.>.crown'ltio)·!hIolMn:lfIt-s!,ofU\ri.arnlllngthwldllNllIrMoeftnuottnaL ICIY'h"a, ... ,IltftU·[!Cnn,lr!e"dF« ~·"'nllbltnryvalu ..... tlntlothecondlllo!lwhln"'pOl.nt~ofthetr .. b"ed.nhll.lth .... dd.fKtI,andu.l,llllingpr ... IIC.olllarpt l·hc,""lc:ondl!:iclI. Z·GoodconochllOn 3· fair ~tiooI, "lInl_.uo-d provided~" ... '1 1n.1III¥e l,5,'uhellth.lIo_concl!tIClMIIUIYwwrar\tl'8lllO'nl 4· PooI'colldrtlDft,rltmO'ial.eeomm,1Ided Tr"Cpn""!gnNQI .. ·Spec:"~irllonn'liononeondltlollofthety""tlldl'" rPl(fPOSEiHiulLjW'l l~~!~_ 5' --.-.~. # ....--<7 ..--.:---_.-------_ .. --- ,Arboricultural Consulting Tony Shoffner Consulting Arborist, Horticulturist ISA Certified Arborist #PN·0909 Member, American Society of Consulting Arborists PO Box 135 Mountlake T erracc, W A 98043'()135 Pbcoe and Fax: (425) 776·08S0 Mobile (206)7.5S·2871 email: amoricultuml.consulting@verizon.net TREE EVALUATION AND IMPACT MAP PARKS/DE AT BURNETT 95 CITY OF RENTON, WA Colpitts Development Company, LLC ZZS6 38th PI. East Seattle, WA 98112 Ita: Ocmberll, 2004 ~'''''''' tlllyV.Shoftner. .SA Certlflsd Arbori't #PN-0909A; Member, Amerinn SocIety of Con,ultlng Amorist, IM(P) Airport Way S 2nd St. G3 .. 19 T23N RSE E V2 c. 6 200 fiO F3 1:4800 18 T23N R5E E 1/2 5318 November 15, 2004 Susan Fiala, Senior Planner Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON NOV 172004 RIECIE~VED Re: File No.lNarne: LUA04-133, SA-H, ECF, CU-HlParkside at 95 Burnett This is regarding the Notice of Application & Proposed Detennination of Non-Significance- Mitigated (DNS-M) which we received from the City of Renton. We are concerned about this project for the following reasons: 1. It would greatly increase the traffic in this area which very well may impact the senior citizen population in the immediate area. --Next to the proposed building site is Cedar River Terrace which houses many seniors. Many of those living there, can be seen going to town daily, some with walkers and a couple with wheel chairs. -Next to Cedar River Terrace is 55 Williams Condominium and there is a high percentage (47%) of seniors living here. We ,who live here, walk to town to shop and for exercise, also. Our "street" is basically an alley which is the only way you can travel (from Burnett) if you wish to cross the river going north (on Wells). The regular street is Tobin, but it doesn't allow you to tum left onto Williams to hook up with S. Riverside. -Signs posted a while back said that Merrill Gardens (a senior residence) is to be built in an area directly across from the proposed site of these 106 apartments. Merrill Gardens will increase our foot traffic. I'm,concerned that bringing 181 vehicles to this limited-access area will prove to be dangerous to citizens already living in this area. 2. Another concern is that there are currently three relatively new apartment buildings within the downtown area--Metropolitan, Burnett Station, and The Renaissance. We have noticed "for lease" signs, which seem to indicate that these are not and have not been filled to capacity. The waterfront apartments near Coulon Park also seem to have many vacancies. Is it necessary to have yet another 106 units in the area? 3. We are not sure what is planned for the "Boeing Property"; shopping has been mentioned and we are concerned that more housing is being planned for that site as well. 4. We are very much interested in making our city a place where people want to live and visit. The trash on the streets is already a concern, (e.g. near the Transit Center). We feel renters,mC;ly take less pride in their community and its environment. We need more people who care about their' community and its environment; our opinion is that renters (as opposed to home owners) may not be such people. We realize the current zoning allows for additional residences in this space, but we feel increasing the density beyond the code would not be beneficial to Downtown Renton. We plan to attend the public hearing on January 11,2005 at 9:00 a.m. If this is rescheduled, we would like to be notified. {!{~/~ 8~/aP~ Cathy & Bruce Pope 55 Williams Ave. S. #105 Renton, WA 98055 425-235-5063 Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor CITY ( F RENTON PlanningIBuildinglPublic Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator November 16,2004 Attn: Jim Hanson Hanson Consulting 17446 Mallard Cove Lane Mount Vernon, W A 98274 SUBJECT: OFF-SITE DEFERRAL ' JAMES MEADOW SHORT PLAT, LUA 04-120 3413 MEADOW AVE N RENTON, WA Dear Mr. Hanson: The Board of Public Works met on November }()th, 2004 to review your application for a deferral with a Restrictive Covenant to cover future installation of curb, gutter, storm drainage, street paving and sidewalks along MeadowAve. N. 'Following a brief discussion, in which (1) additional condition was added to this deferral, a decision was made to grant the deferral, subject to the following conditions: 1. A minimum of20 feet of pavement be installed along Meadow Ave. N. from N. 34th Street for fire emergency acce~s. 2. The applicant agrees to sign and record a Restrictive Covenant to partiCipate in any , future Local Improvement District(LID) ()r otherCity initiated project to provide the improvements for curb, gutter; sid~walks, street paving and storm water drai~age which have been deferred. Said covenant shall be recorded prior to recording of the short plat, or within two (2) years from the Board of Public Works decision, whichever comes first. ' 3. A minimum of31 feet ofRight-:of~Waybe.established and remain between the ',existing noise wall and property line. .' . Please· find theenc10sed Restrictive Covenant,fill out and return to the City ofRentoti in the provided envdope. As per Ordinance 4521, Section 4-34~14,you have fifteen (15) days from today'sdate to appeal . the Board's decision. Appeals are'to be filed in writing, with the City Clerk and require a filing fee of $75.00. -----'----10-5-5 -So'-u-th-G-r-a-dy-W-ay---R-e-n-to-n,-W.-a-s-hi-n-gt-on-9~80-5-5----"'-~-.~ * This paper contains 50% recycled material, 30% post consumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE November 16, 2004 Page 2 You may call Juliana Fries, Board Coordinator, at (425) 430-7278 if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, ~.L~r;vLc( ~vL-d.tl'kl.Ctv1 Crystal McMeans Recording Secretary Enclosure cc: Neil Watts, Chainnan Juliana Fries, Coordinator Gregg Zimmennan, PIBIPW Administrator . Jan lilian, Plan Review LUA 04-120 File "." ~ > ~-• DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM November 16,2004 Susan Fiala ~an lilian x 7216 95 BURNETT APARTMENTS 95 Burnett Ave South LUA 00-171 I have reviewed the application for 95 Burnett and have the following comments: EXISTING CONDITIONS WATER There is an a-inch and 24-inch water main in Burnett Ave S. Pressure zone is 196. SEWER STORM STREET The site is not within an Aquifer Protection Zone. Available pressure is approximately 70 psi. Available fire flow is 5,500 gpm There is an existing 15 -inch sewer main on site. There are storm facilities in Burnett Ave S. There is asphalt roadway; in Burnett Ave S. There is no curb, gutter or sidewalk fronting the site. . CODE REQUIREMENTS WATER 1. The System Development Charges shall be $7,745.75. (The rate is $0.213 x 36,365 square feet). This fee is payable with the construction permit. A redevelopment credit will apply for prior water service connections to this site. 2. Preliminary fire flow is 4,000 gpm. To meet this requirement applicant will require 4 hydrants. The two existing hydrants on the a-inch will be counted and 2 additional hydrants will be required to be installed on the 24 -inch water main in Burnett. Existing hydrants shall be retrofitted with Storz "quick disconnect" fittings if not already in place. 3. A fire sprinkler system is required. Separate plans and utility permit for the installation of the Double Detector Check Valve Assembly will be required. All devices installed shall be per the latest Department of Health "Approved List" of Backflow Prevention Devices. Civil plans must show location of device. For DDCVA installations inside the building, applicant shall submit a copy of the mechanical plan showing the location and installation of the backflow assembly inside the mechanical room. Installation shall be in accordance with the City of Renton's requirements. DDCVA shall be 4. Buildings that exceed 30 feet in height will require a backflow device to be installed on domestic water meter. Include note on the civil plan. 5. Landscape irrigation systems will require a separate permit for the irrigation meter and approved backflow device is required to be installed. A plumbing permit will be required. SANITARY SEWER 1. The Sanitary System Development Charge is $ 4,581.99. (The rate is $ 0.126 x 36,365 square feet). This fee is payable with the construction permit. A redevelopment credit will apply for previous sewer service connections to this site. 2. The building department will require floor drains in the parking garage. The system shall be connected to the sanitary sewer. Flows shall be directed through floor drains that are installed in accordance with the UPC to an exterior oil/water separator whenever possible. The separator shall be sized to meet a minimum 15-minute retention time for peak flows antiCipated in the garage area, but in no case will be less than 200 gallons of storage capacity. The type of interceptor shall be as manufactured by Pipe Inc., Utility Vault Inc., or approved equal. 3. Existing septic systems shall be abandoned in accordance with King County Health. SURFACE WATER 1. System Development Charges have been paid in full. No additional fee is owed. 2. No water quality treatment is required. No detention calculations are required for this project. 3. A drainage report has been submitted and is currently under review. 4. Temporary erosion control shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the utility inspector for the duration of the project. Certification of the installation, maintenance and proper removal of the erosion control facilities is required prior to Temporary Certificate of Occupancy. TRANSPORTATION 1. A street lighting plan is required to be provided. 2. Half street improvements including sidewalk, curb, gutter, storm drainage and paving are required to be installed per City code fronting the site in Burnett Ave S. 3. A traffic study has been submitted and is currently under review. PLAN REVIEW -GENERAL 1. All plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. 2. All required utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed Civil Engineer. 3. When plans are complete three copies of the drawings, two copies of the drainage report, a construction estimate and application fee shall be submitted at the sixth floor counter. A fee worksheet is attached for your use, but prior to preparing a check it is recommended to call 425- 430-7266 for a fee estimate as generated by the permit system. 4. Separate permits for side sewers, water meters, irrigation meters and backflow devices are required. 5. A separate permit to cut and cap existing utilities to existing structures on site will be required as part of the demolition permit. 6. A traffic control plan shall be submitted for approval prior to any permit being issued. 7. A construction plan indicating haul route and hours, construction hours and a traffic control plan shall be submitted for approval prior to any permit being issued. Haul hours shall be restricted to 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. unless approved in advance by the Development Services Division. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS 1. Staff recommends a SEPA condition requiring this project to design and comply with Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements as outlined in Volume II of the 2001 Stormwater Management Manual. 2. Traffic mitigation fee will be $ 21,900.00. Fee is based on 292 new (net) trips x $75 per trip. This is payable at time of building permit issuance cc: Kayren Kittrick PROPERTY SEIIFES FEE REVIEW #2004 -G if cq DEVEWPMENT APPLICATId!lrREVIEW SHEET 0 PLAN R};VlEW ROUTING SLIP ~ ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET 0 APPLICANT: DA.tSid..o. 5 WfJ u.c o;::tEIVEDFROM JOB ADDRESS:--I--4-~~~'--W'l-L-!..L-=:-t-f---1+'L"'---::-:=--:-:-.--;±-;--rr-r--~_----r NATUREOFlNORK:~\aL~~+-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ won rr33G? 1\dJ3/a± • (date) GREEN # _____ _ o SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AND CONNECTION FEES APP lED NEED MORE INFORMATION: o LEGALDF.SCRIPTION c;a.... SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AND CONNECfION FEES F.STIMA TED o SQUARE FOOTAGE o VICINITY MAP o NOT APPROVED FOR APPLICATION OF FEF.S o FRONT FOOTAGE o OTHER o VESTED 0 NOT VESTED o This fee review supersedes and cancels fee review # dated __ ----==---=-:-===== () 0 PARENT PIDI (subject to cbangeL SUBJECT PROPERTY PIDI 000120·-tX>t3) -Q\ <-j i 0 King Co. Tax Acct# (new) _______ _ It is the intent of this development fee analysis to put the developer/owner on notice, that the fees quoted below may be applicable to the subject site upon development of the property. All quoted fees are potential charges that may be due and payable at the time the construction permit is issued to install ihe on-site and off-site improvements (ie .. undelground.utilities, street improvements, etc.) Triggering mechanisms for the SOC fees will be based on current City ordinances and determined by the applicable Utility Section. Please note that these fees are subject to change without notice. Final fees will be based on rates in effect at time of Building Permit/Construction Permit application. The following quoted fees do NOT include inspection fees, side sewer permits, r/w permit fees or the cost of water meters. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISfRICf PARCEL METHOD OF ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT DlSTRlcrs NO. NO. ASSESSMENT UNITS OR FEE Latecomer A2I"eement (pvt) WATER Latecomer -A2I"eement (Pvt)W ASTEW A TER Latecomer M!reement (pvt)OTHER Special Assessment DistricUW A TER Special Assessment DistricUW ASTEW ATER Joint Use A2reement (METRO) Local Improvement District * Traffic Benefit Zones $75.00 PER TRIP, CALCULATED BY TRANSPORTATION FUTURE OBLIGATIONS SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE -WATER # OFUNITSI SDC FEE o Pd Prevo o Partially Pd (Ltd Exemption) lij Never Pd SQ. FfG. Sin~le family residential $1,525/unit x I Mobile home dwellin2 unit $1220/unit in park Apartment, Condo $915/unit not in CD or COR zones x CommerciallIndustrial, $O.213/sq. ft. of property (not less than $1525.00) x '3CJ. -')(o'? ~:f'1Cj. =!~ Boeing, by Special Agi-eementlFootprint of Bldg plus 15 ft perimeter (2,800 GPM thRsbold) , SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE -WASTEWA:~ o Pd Prev. 0 Partially Pd (Ltd Exemption) Never Pd Sin~le family residential dwelling unit $900/unit x f. Mobile home dwellin2 unit $720/unit x Apartment, Condo $540/unit not in CD or COR zones x L-\ \ '5 'if \. q Cf CommerciallIndustrial, $O.126/sq. ft. of property (not less than $900.00) X -~~ \~.fi REDEVELOPMENT CREDIT: (New -Old Flow)lNew Flow X Above Fees I , SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE -SURFACEYTER o Pd Prev. 0 Partially Pd (Ltd Exemption) Never Pd .Ll Sinde family residential and mobile home dwelling unit $715/unit x IL£~ All other properties $O.249/sq ft of new impervious area of property x ~4)sl\~ ir.RLJio iA,. (not less than $715.00) ~ )'~r?-' ~ .f ~ IPRELThflNARYTOTAL $ ,.{lo, q?C(. X1.? -t I *If subject property is within an LID, it is developer's responsibility to check with the Finance Dept. for paid/un-paid status. **The square footage figures used are taken from the King County Assessor's map and are approximate only. '* ... Su.blfJcJ ·iv. \;i3tl .... '1ccthG'Y\ ~l ..... ~1. ~ .. GV1eLi.-,{,~ EFFECTIVE January 1, 2004 R 1-. d' /" ./\ .. f-e. ~ ~J . ~,,,,,,',~ LL:).~.~~h.i '--J.' ..• }. , , ~Clt.A . i: ~ ..... LA ~~:'.J. C::"\,rv:'~ -"'~. '." f:v,sl~ --vJ". -t. "'" , .: "-' -l '< CD PI t1 t1 CD < .... CD t: :l 0 I\) 0 0 "'" 0 City of Renton Department of Planning / Building / Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 14 an ~J. Io."} COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 17, 2004 APPLICATION NO: LUA04-133, SA-H, ECF, CU-H DATE CIRCULATED: NOVEMBER 3, 2004 APPLICANT: Parkside at 95 Burnett LLC PROJECT MANAGER: Susan Fiala PROJECT TITLE: Parks ide at 95 Burnett PLAN REVIEW: Jan lilian SITE AREA: 36,347 square feet BUILDING AREA (gross): 147,430 square feet LOCATION: 77 & 95 Burnett Avenue S I WORK ORDER NO: 77336 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review, Hearing Examiner Site Plan and Hearing Examiner Conditional Use approval for a 147,430 sq. ft. multi family residential development. The site is 0.83 acres in size and is relatively flat with no known critical areas. The project would include 106 dwelling units, indoor exercise room, common areas and service areas within six building levels including four residential, and two levels of structured parking of which one level would be below grade. Ten of the multi family units would be townhouse style and front directly onto Burnett Ave. So. The remaining multi family units would be setback from the street. The structured parking garage would include 181 parking stalls of which 46 would be tandem. The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit in order to increase the density above the maximum of the CD zone. The subject property is located within the Center Downtown (CD) zoning designation, Downtown Core and Urban Center Design Overlay District A. . A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10.000 Feet 14.000 Feet B. POLICY-RELA TED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional in~ ation is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director 0 Date City of Renton Department of Planning / Building / Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: SlJJr~1 "'\n~J " L. JY COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 17, 2004 APPLICATION NO: LUA04-133, SA-H, ECF,' CU-H DATE CIRCULATED: NOVEMBER 3, 2004 APPLICANT: Parkside at 95 Burnett LLC PROJECT MANAGER: Susan Fiala PROJECT TITLE: Parkside at 95 Burnett PLAN REVIEW: Jan "'ian NOV lib .. ~ U SITE AREA: 36,347 square feet BUILDING AREA (gross): 147,430 square fe18III' LOCATION: 77 & 95 Burnett Avenue S WORK ORDER NO: 77336 '''Vlfl/G DllIlSlnA SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review, Hearing Examiner Site Plan and Hearing Examiner Conditional Use approval for a 147,430 sq. ft. multi family residential development. The site is 0.83 acres in size and is relatively flat with no known critical areas. The project would include 106 dwelling units, indoor exercise room, common areas and service areas within six building levels including four residential, and two levels of structured parking of which one level would be below grade. Ten of the multi family units would be townhouse style and front directly onto Burnett Ave. So. The remaining multi family units would be setback from the street. The structured parking garage would include 181 parking stalls of which 46 would be tandem. The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit in order to increase the density above the maximum of the CD zone. The subject property is located within the Center Downtown (CD) zoning designation, Downtown Core and Urban Center Design Overlay District A. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS \ C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additio 'nformation is needed to properly assess this proposal. /1-i7-4( Signature of Dir Date I .... , ... S#_~-=----q_f? __ _ Project Name: ~A\?~5\t::£ @ £15 1:>U(~ Project Address: 71 d-q 5 'bJC\f\..R-1!" i¥.K S Contact Person: :?0:V~~~ @ qS BvIJ'!'\..d\ L..LC.-- Permit Number: -=L.::;;;j\)"'-IBu.-~O:""Y.l...-~'3~3 ___________ -:--_____ _ Project Description: \Olo ~ ~~~ o\lA){)9<hA1~ ~ Co)\'lM.Q\b.... ().}I(OS {)ly'\c\ ~, \J (J Land Use Type: ~ Residential D Retail D Non-retail Calculation: Transportation Mitigation Fee: Calculated by: Method of Calculation: D ITE Trip Generation Manual, 7th Edition t8-Traffic Study JTh J \ t-.)C ' D Other CJ/IO/ (}tX)l{ . ~~t\ ~ VM~ I Date: \I\\~~~ Date of Payment: __________________ _ 1"'.--'-'-. ,---'~. ,.""'"'-".,.".""." .... ,,--" , .... ,',." .. ,--"" .. -.,-, .... LKayreQ Kittri~~,:. Re: P51!...~sid~_ atJ~§ Bur'l~tt' From: To: Date: Subject: Kayren "Mark Jacobs, PE, PTOE" <jaketraffic@comcast.net> "Kayren Kittrick" <Kkittrick@cLrenton.wa.us> 11/10/2004 3:56: 19 PM Re: Parkside at 95 Burnett Traffic Report The 10% value is correct, the 5% was a typo The mitigation fee is revised to (641 -349) x $75 = $21,900 versuJ the $20,775 identified in my TIA. ~ '\ VJ Contact me if you have any questions. f'J..rA "¥ ) Mark • 0" -----Original Message ----- From: "Kayren Kittrick" <Kkittrick@cLrenton.wa.us> To: <jaketraffic@comcast.net> Sent: Wednesday, November 10,20043:14 PM Subject: Re: Parkside at 95 Burnett Traffic Report > No problem. > »» "Mark Jacobs, PE, PTOE" <jaketraffic@comcast.net> 11/10/2004 > 3:06:30 PM »> > received e-mail and will get back to you later today. > > > > -----Original Message ----- > From: "Kayren Kittrick" <Kkittrick@cLrenton.wa.us> > To: <jaketraffic@comcast.net> > Cc: "Jan lilian" <Jillian@cLrenton.wa.us>; "Susan Fiala" > <Sfiala@cLrenton.wa.us> > Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 20042:54 PM > Subject: Parks ide at 95 Burnett Traffic Report > > » In reviewing the traffic report for the 95 Burnett project dated » September 1 0, 2004 there are some concerns that need clarification » before the project can continue. » »On page 6: Trip Generation, Appendix B of the Trip Generation » Handbook is cited as identifying a 5% vehicle trip reduction. But >in » the last sentence of the same paragraph you cite a 10% reduction. » will need clarification of which is correct, and preferably a copy > of » Table B3. I could not locate it in my copy of the User's Guide, nor > the » Trip Generation volumes. The city may agree with the sense of it, > but » the source is needed. » » Page 7 -Agency Traffic Mitigation Requirements and Table 1 in the » Appendix with reference to the traffic impact report dated 11/20100 > by » TPE, Inc. The Landee Feed Company was a mixed warehouse and > limited » retail building. During abatement, it was inspected and audited for » uses. There was no office space identified or in use, obviously for > many »years. The calculations based on office space are disallowed, > pending » further documentation by your office. » » By adding the office square footage to the warehouse for a total of » 29,495 square feet then applying the rate of 4.96 per thousand, a > total » of 146 trips is generated. This added to the retail trips of 203 is >a » grand total of 349 trips for credit. » » The study has not been reviewed completely by our Transportation »division, but seems complete and reasonable with the exception of >the » two items noted above. If you have any questions, please contact me » through Susan Fiala so the project file notations may be completed. » » Sincerely, » » » » Kayren Kittrick » Development Engineering Supervisor » Public Works Inspections & Permits » 425-430-7299 » » » This message has been scanned by the City of Renton's filtering > gateway. » > > > > This message has been scanned by the City of Renton's filtering gateway. > KathyKeolker~Wheeler,'Mayor CITY" RENTON' PlanningIBuilding/Public WorkS Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., A~ministrator TRANsroRTAtioN Table, B.3 Transportation Impact Factors Development Around Transit centers and Light Rail Stations ornER IMA\CTFACTa::t DEVELOPMENTPAITERN . O~1lNTENSITY PEDE~ICYCLE.FACBJTlES CHARACTERISTICS . SOUflCES 5% Vehicle Trip Reduction Locate COIT11TlflI'Ci< aroIor light incIJstriai Minimum FAR of 1 per gross 'acre tor cortmertiaVrous- lrial development' Direct, safe cc:nnElCiions between corwnercialf,ndustrial uses and trans" CGIltE! or light I1liI stations, Preferable n silfe end seCure bi.."Y' cia i:JaI~og is ormided at com· fT'lEltiallrxiustriai uses, trmsit cCnt6rs, or Iig!U ral stations, Commerciaf uses ' JHK: 6193 tcicated witt: mi:ii-LACMTA, _ uses withi1114 mae of a transit CGmer ex light rail statIOn, mal setbacks, 11193' Com:nerciaI includes retail 8!1G non·retail wses. • ,r+:?1~<%')~~}~.\~'~{_~~'1i~,~~~~,~:t;'i~;fl!!" 15%V€hice ' TriP Reduction a transit center Of light d\o.'EliIir>J unru: per ight'rail stations, Preferable if sate mal setbacks. ra.1 station. gross acre. and secure bicycle parl<ingis pro-CorIllTl<>'Cial Locate oomrne<daI aridlex fight industrial uses within 114 mae of a , lransit center or JgItt rei! station, Minirrum FAR of 2 per gross acre for commercialfrous- trial development: \'ided at transit Centers, ex Iig1I i1ctudes retail and 'ral stalioos, roo· retai uses, Direct, safe connectionS between convneteiatfndustrial uses and t-ansit center or iglt rail stations, ~feraiJJe U safe and secure bicy-ciO pal.iog is P'rOvided at oom- merciaVlIldustnal :..'&.-is. transU c6ntas, rx light raj Sl,~tions_ CornrneroaJ uses located wah mini· mal setbact<s, Commercial includes retail and non-ffitail uses, 15% Vehicle ' locate ~!iaI-{)fienled Minimum residenliai density of 24 dwe!ing ",ts per gr~ac:re, Dnect.saie connections between call1OOlCialftndustriai uses, resi· dence:;, ",vi !rarSi! ceriter (y ig1t mil stalims: Preterable n'saJe and secure bic}de parmg is W.ided at com'THciallindustriaJ uses. lransil 00lI<rs' ()( IgJt r8!l stations: Corrvnerciaf uses IocatecJwilh mini· rr.' setbacks, Commercial', ,ncltkies retrul a'1d ncn:retail~:' Trip Reduction nixed lise drMtJpin6nt . ,20%'\.\Jhicle Trip Reduction IMthin 1/4 mte of a tronSit center ~ wj1I ral stiocn. MilMJm 15% offici:.-' area deo.otBq to ,CCIITrr'E<- cialllses fXienled ioward ,. r"; t1! rcsidenOes, ,,'. " Locate I1'1ixSd,use coo>-, ' 'Mrmrum FAR of 2 DirOCt; safe C:onnectons betweoo meiciaI and light I'dustlilI p6r groSSoo,,'!cii ,:' ccimrlle'oavndlstriaJ USes. P-Si- developnient that " comri1eri:iaIIoous-dences, aix! ,ifllllSit Center or ligllI includes ncri-residenja( trial dI"",Iopment. rail statms. Preferable W safe and uses'within t/4 rriIe of a' secure bic'yde,~ is pro.ided ,transit cOOter orlighl rail at comme'cialfndustriaf uses, station, At teast30% of 'transit centers, or b;lhl ral S1ations, floor area for residential " use. Commercial woes " ioCated wah mir'· mOl setbaCkS, Qynmercial in<:Wes "'a~ and non~ret.3l1 usos. Source: 01)OT IDLeD Tr.mspon:ltion &. Growth ,"'bnagement Prol,'l'am: Reprinred with' pcnnission, 120 ITE • Trip Generation HandbOOk ApPendix B 1055 South Grady Way -Renton, Washington 98055 * This paper contains 50% recyded material, 30% post consumer LACf,.fTA; , 11/93 lACMTA, 11ilJ3 lACMTA, 11193 -~. ~,' AH EAD OF THE CURVE City of Renton Department of Planning / Building / Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: T(--o-..tlSD~r~' l:"\n COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 17, 200~ APPLICATION NO: LUA04-133, SA-H, ECF, CU-H R E . v!:. HENTON DATE CIRCULATED: NOVEMBER 3, 2004 eEl V': n -APPLICANT: Parkside at 95 Burnett LLC PROJECT MANAGER: Susan Fiala Nnv n ." " ... PROJECT TITLE: Parkside at 95 Burnett PLAN REVIEW: Jan lilian SITE AREA: 36,347 sguare feet BUILDING AREA (gross): 147,430 squar~~~tLJING DIVISION LOCATION: 77 & 95 Burnett Avenue S I WORK ORDER NO: 77336 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review, Hearing Examiner Site Plan and Hearing Examiner Conditional Use approval for a 147,430 sq. ft. multi family residential development. The site is 0.83 acres in size and is relatively flat with no known critical areas. The project would include 106 dwelling units, indoor exercise room, common areas and service areas within six building levels including four residential, and two levels of structured parking of which one level would be below grade. Ten of the multi family units would be townhouse style and front directly onto Burnett Ave. So. The remaining multi family units would be setback from the street. The structured parking garage would include 181 parking stalls of which 46 would be tandem. The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit in order to increase the density above the maximum of the CD zone. The subject property is located within the Center Downtown (CD) zoning designation, Downtown Core and Urban Center Design Overlay District A. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public SeNices Energy/ HistoridCultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10.000 Feet 14.000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional info n is needed to pro erly assess this proposal. 1/-/7 -f7f/' Date City of R~nton Department of Planning / Building / Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 17, 2004 APPLICATION NO: LUA04-133, SA-H, ECF, CU-H DATE CIRCULATED: NOVEMBER 3, 2004 APPLICANT: Parkside at 95 Burnett LLC PROJECT MANAGER: Susan Fiala PROJECT TITLE: Parks ide at 95 Burnett PLAN REVIEW: Jan lilian SITE AREA: 36,347 s uare feet uare feet LOCATION: 77 & 95 Burnett Avenue S SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review, Hearing Examiner Site Plan and Hearing Examiner Conditional Use approval for a 147,430 sq. ft. multi family residential development. The site is 0.83 acres in size and is relatively flat with no known critical areas. The project would include 106 dwelling units, indoor exercise room, common areas and service areas within six building levels including four residential, and two levels of structured parking of which one level would be below grade. Ten of the multi family units would be townhouse style and front directly onto Burnett Ave. So. The remaining multi family units would be setback from the street. The structured parking garage would include 181 parking stalls of which 46 would be tandem. The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit in order to increase the density above the maximum of the CD zone. The subject property is located within the Center Downtown (CD) zoning designation, Downtown Core and Urban Center Design Overlay District A. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major. Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10.000 Feet 14.000 Feet B. POLICY-RELA TED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expert; e and have identified areas of probable impact or areas whef(~ additional i ormation is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Dir Date I~ City of Re, .. <Jn Department of Planning / Building / Public h~.KS ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 17, 2004 APPLICATION NO: LUA04-133, SA-H, ECF, CU-H DATE CIRCULATED: NOVEMBER 3, 2 APPLICANT: Parkside at 95 Burnett LLC PROJECT MANAGER: Susan Fiala PROJECT TITLE: Parkside at 95 Burnett PLAN REVIEW: Jan lilian SITE AREA: 36,347 s uare feet BUILDING AREA ross: 147,430 SIJjHIIlI<=rJf.,,,,t LOCATION: 77 & 95 Burnett Avenue S I WORK ORDER NO: 77336 lS/OlV SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review, Hearing Examiner Site Plan and Hearing Examiner Conditional Use approval for a 147,430 sq. ft. multi family residential development. The site is 0.83 acres in size and is relatively flat with no known critical areas. The project would include 106 dwelling units, indoor exercise room, common areas and service areas within six building levels including four residential, and two levels of structured parking of which one level would be below grade. Ten of the multi family units would be townhouse style and front directly onto Burnett Ave. So. The remaining multi family units would be setback from the street. The structured parking garage would include 181 parking stalls of which 46 would be tandem. The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit in order to increase the density above the maximum of the CD zone. The subject property is located within the Center Downtown (CD) zoning designation, Downtown Core and Urban Center DeSign Overlay District A. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELA TED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS E / 'C v a Iv.,. L 0 6 b t.t "5--f C1; 2--1. d V1 Fa j {() t-t/ 50;-/ ~ r:<. e fO" Ire C Q Vl-1 Wf ~ (/1 de !.-o lA ') We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional inform tion is needed to properly asse this p~ I. , rl Signature 0 ~~~'-""'''''''':iP"L Date I City of Renton Department of Planning / Building / Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ?0Jr'k...s COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 17, 2004 APPLICATION NO: LUA04-133, SA-H, ECF, CU-H DATE CIRCULATED: NOVEMBER 3, 2004 IY~. ',-( ',... ,' ...... APPLICANT: Parkside at 95 Burnett LLC PROJECT MANAGER: Susan Fiala ""c:-J I "", PROJECT TITLE: Parkside at 95 Burnett PLAN REVIEW: Jan lilian /VOII' '''f ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--------------~~~~~~~~~~--------------------~~~~~ ~ SITE AREA: 36,347 square feet BUILDING AREA (gross): 147,430 square feet ()" O/"!,,, v flOOtf LOCATION: 77 & 95 Burnett Avenue S WORK ORDER NO: 77336 -' IIf4tu",CJ: I?S-A, ... SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review, Hearing Examiner Site Plan and He~~~CfIv Examiner Conditional Use approval for a 147,430 sq. ft. multi family residential development. The site is 0.83 acres in size and is VS-S relatively flat with no known critical areas. The project would include 106 dwelling units, indoor exercise room, common areas and service areas within six building levels including four residential, and two levels of structured parking of which one level would be below grade. Ten of the multi family units would be townhouse style and front directly onto Burnett Ave. So. The remaining multi family units would be setback from the street. The structured parking garage would include 181 parking stalls of which 46 would be tandem. The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit in order to increase the density above the maximum of the CD zone. The subject property is located within the Center Downtown (CD) zoning designation, Downtown Core and Urban Center Design Overlay District A. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water .::::..c:---..>< Light/Glare Plants Recreation .:::..c-...:><::: LandlShoreline Use Utilities Animals TranSpOrtation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet C/ ~hJn f/c;t/} tla '/u1/1C/YJ 0/9 Ct»1Cl'oc ,.a4.-~' A./J~~A" , 'a/.7tC· ( 'E' - C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS ~Cl/lA-/L1) ~c:uiJ r/J ~-1k, We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or .,ea, where d"mona} ;"Ionna'on;s ed<d to properly ass"" Ih~ _al. I 1/ //0/11 Date I I RENTON POLICE DEPARTMENT Parkside @ 95 Burnett Av South 77 & 95 Burnett Av S POLICE RELATED COMMENTS 98 Police calls for service estimated annually CONSTRUCTION PHASE Theft from construction sites is one of the most commonly reported crimes in the City. To protect materials and equipment it is recommended that all materials and tools be locked up when not in use. The site will need security lighting, and any construction trailer or storage area should be completely fenced in with portable chain-link fencing. The fence will provide both a physical and psychological barrier to any prospective criminal and will demonstrate that the area is-private property. Construction trailers should be kept locked when not in use, and should be fitted with heavy-duty dead bolts with a minimum 1-1/2" throw when bolted. Glass windows in construction trailers should be shatter-resistant. Toolboxes and storage containers should be secured with heavy- duty padlocks and kept locked when not in use. "No Trespassing" signs should be posted on the property during the construction phase. These signs serve as a first warning to those that are trespassing on the property. This will aid police in making arrests on the property after hours if suspects are observed vandalizing or stealing building materials. COMPLETED COMPLEX Each residential unit should have solid core doors, preferably metal or solid wood, with peepholes. The doors should have heavy-duty deadbolt locks with a minimum 1-%" throw and installed with 3" screws. Any external storage areas should also have solid wood or metal doors, with dead bolts and latch guards installed. Sliding windows, including glass patio doors, should have secondary locks installed to restrict vertical movement. These secondary locks need to be placed into the top or bottom of the window frames to restrict vertical movement. Simply placing a sturdy, fitted dowel in the window tracks may be adequate. Alarm systems are recommended for each residential unit, to include the exercise room, common areas, and any service areas. Any stairways at the complex should be constructed of lattice, wood or metal railing so that visibility is possible through them. There should not be solid walls in any stairway that would limit visibility up and down the stairs, or provide a place for a criminal to hide while waiting for someone to target. 1 Balcony construction should also be of lattice or railing -no solid walls, for the same reason. Security lighting should be installed along sidewalks, in stairways, foyers and pathways. Each residential unit should have individual unit numbers clearly posted with numbers at least 6" in height and of a color contrasting with the building. Unit numbers should also be illuminated so that they are easily located. This will assist emergency personnel in locating the correct location for response. It's important to provide confidential entry information (Le., a "secret" law enforcement-only code) to both fire and police in case of emergencies if this building is secured. Proper lighting in the parking garage is especially important. Illumination in this area will contribute to the security of residents traversing from their vehicles to their residences, and will help reduce property crimes associated with unattended vehicles. I would like to discourage the use of remote control garage openers for this property, and have a keypad put in its place. It's common for remote controls to be stolen during theft from motor vehicle incidents, and then used by the criminal to gain access to the building at a later date. This will also negate the necessity of residents having to bring their remote controls into the management office for reprogramming in the event one is stolen. Latch guards should be installed on any and all doors leading from the outside in. And any lever-handled doorknob, that is on the outside, should be discouraged. These are extremely easy to pry/damage to obtain access inside a building. Where egress might be an issue, bar-releases can be installed to meet Fire Code requirements. This would include any storage rooms, maintenance shops, doors leading into the parking garage, etc. Any doors that have large panes of glass should have an application of security film installed. This can strengthen the glass up to 300% and would assist in deterring criminals from gaining entry by shattering this part of the door. If this product is something you're interested in, please contact me (425) 430-7521. Any separate resident storage units should have latch guards and dead bolts installed. Dumpster locations should be well lit with automatic door closers installed. It's common for residents to prop these doors open, which could create a safety hazard. Landscaping should be installed with the objective of allowing visibility -not too dense and not too high. Too much landscaping will make residents feel isolated, and will provide criminals with concealment to commit crimes such as burglary and vandalism. 2 City of Renton Department of Planning / Building / Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ~1,1Ze. COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 17, 2004 APPLICATION NO: LUA04-133, SA-H, ECF, CU-H DATE CIRCULATED: NOVEMBE.£La...2004 APPLICANT: Parkside at 95 Burnett LLC PROJECT MANAGE~san Fiala ~ PROJECT TITLE: Parkside at 95 Burnett PLAN REVIEW: Jan'nuan \ l) "C.J v SITE AREA: 36,347 square feet BUILDING AREA (gross): 147,430 square feet LOCATION: 77 & 95 Burnett Avenue S I WORK ORDER NO: 77336 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review, Hearing Examiner Site Plan and Hearing Examiner Conditional Use approval for a 147,430 sq. ft. multi family residential development. The site is 0.83 acres in size and is relatively flat with no known critical areas. The project would include 106 dwelling units, indoor exercise room, common areas and service areas within six building levels including four residential, and two levels of structured parking of which one level would be below grade. Ten of the multi family units would be townhouse style and front directly onto Burnett Ave. So. The remaining multi family units would be setback from the street. The structured parking garage would include 181 parking stalls of which 46 would be tandem. The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit in order to increase the density above the maximum of the CD zone. The subject property is located within the Center Downtown (CD) zoning deSignation, Downtown Core and Urban Center Design Overlay District A. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation ..- Environmental Health Public Services , Energy/ HistoridCultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet (yS -villOJ\1 B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. CP~ ~I~S~~~ __ __ Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date ,'" DATE: TO: FROM: CITY OF RENTON FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU MEMORANDUM November 4,2004 Susan Fiala, Senior Planner Corey Thomas, Plans Review Inspector SUBJECT: Comments for Parkside at 95 Burnett MITIGATION ITEMS; 1. A fire mitigation fee of$41,128 is required based on $388 per multi- family unit. FIRE CODE REQUIREMENTS: 1. The preliminary fire flow is 4,000 gpm, one hydrant is required within 150 feet of the structure and three additional hydrants are required within 300 feet of the structure. 2. Separate plans and permits are required for the installation of fire alarm, fire sprinkler and fire standpipe systems. City of Renton Department of Planning / Building / Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: F'trt:. COMMENTS DUE: ri\=l~I::j{~~ 1t7,n2Q.Q4rr; £:::\ APPLICATION NO: LUA04-133, SA-H, ECF, CU-H DATE CIRCULATED: It,Jopr'~ -~:" ~v~ L l:>.. 11 I APPLICANT: Parkside at 95 Burnett LLC PROJECT MANAGER\ St\)J n Fiala . \ \ PROJECT TITLE: Parkside at 95 Burnett PLAN REVIEW: Jan II iWn U NUV -,j LUU't I L.::.J SITE AREA: 36,347 sguare feet BUILDING AREA (grm s): 14 "'" , • LOCATION: 77 & 95 Burnett Avenue S WORK ORDER NO: 7 7336 v' OEn:RT";:'~'T FiRE .' h I i"1l: ~ SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review, Hearing Examiner Site Plan and Hearing Examiner Conditional Use approval for a 147,430 sq. ft. multi family residential development. The site is 0.83 acres in size and is relatively flat with no known critical areas. The project would include 106 dwelling units, indoor exercise room, common areas and service areas within six building levels including four residential, and two levels of structured parking of which one level would be below grade. Ten of the multi family units would be townhouse style and frqnt directly onto Burnett Ave. So. The remaining multi family units would be setback from the street. The structured parking garage would include 181 parking stalls of which 46 would be tandem. The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit in order to increase the density above the maximum of the CD zone. The subject property is located within the Center Downtown (CD) zoning designation, Downtown Core and Urban Center Design Overlay District A. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment to,OOO Feet 14,000 Feet 5ee... B. POLICY-RELA TED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Date .~, Agencies See Attached (Signature of ..... olnn<:>r ';:~---"':~----7;z::....-C::=-:=::---T----------::~~~. _~~:~ .. ~~~llttt SS : ~\'"";t,\SSfOp{~"""~"" .. ..o~ ~"" 0-(\ ~ COUNTY OF KING : :"0 ~OT..<1t9L~"'""t'\ ~ ~: ,-m: ~ ~ : c..~~: ~ I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Patrick Roduin ~ ~ \ ,ouaLle ..: i signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and v61~~~btpr""th"~¥s and purposes mentioned in the instrument. '\ O;::-"'~":'""-:"'"\~0"'-_-- II, '''ASp ...... .. Dated: II I UJtlolj ~ ~. 1,,\\ , ...... ... Notary (Print): ____ --.;'!¥f!..~A.?~.~!..Y!'!'_~.!..;:;K_FJA.~~sqc~P~.E:HFF--------------'-- My appointment expires: MY APPOINTMENT EXPiRES 6-29-07 Parkside at 95 Burnett LUA04-133, SA-H, ECF, CU-H template' affidavit of service by mailing Dept. of Ecology· Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 WSDOT Northwest Region • Attn: Ramin Pazooki King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240 PO Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 US Army Corp. of Engineers· Seattle District Office Attn: SEPA Reviewer PO Box C-3755 Seattle, WA 98124 Jamey Taylor· Depart. of Natural Resources PO Box 47015 Olympia, WA 98504-7015 KC Dev. & Environmental Servo Attn: SEPA Section 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 Metro Transit Senior Environmental Planner Gary Kriedt AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING (ERe DETERMINATIONS) WDFW -Stewart Reinbold· Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. clo Department of Ecology . 3190 160th Ave SE Attn. SEPA Reviewer Bellevue, WA 98008 39015 _172nd Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092 Duwamish Tribal Office· Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program 4717 W Marginal Way SW . Seattle, WA 98106-1514 Attn: Ms Melissa Calvert 39015 172nd Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092-9763 KC Wastewater Treatment Division· Office of Archaeology & Historic Environmental Planning Supervisor Preservation· Ms. Shirley Marroquin Attn: Stephanie Kramer 201 S. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050 PO Box 48343 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 Olympia, WA 98504-8343 City of Newcastle City of Kent Attn: Mr. Micheal E. Nicholson Attn: Mr. Fred Satterstrom, AICP Director of Community Development Acting Community Dev. Director 13020 SE 720d Place 220 Fourth Avenue South Newcastle, WA 98059 Kent, WA 98032-5895 Puget Sound Energy City of Tukwila Municipal Liason Manager Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official Joe Jainga 6300 Southcenter Blvd. 201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431 PO Box 90868, MS: XRD-01W Tukwila, WA 98188 Seattle, WA 98104-3856 Bellevue, WA 98009-0868 Seattle Public Utilities Real Estate Services Title Examiner 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 PO Box 34018 Seattle, WA 98124-4018 Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS", the marked agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy of the checklist, PMT's, and the notice of application .• Also note, do not mail Jamey Taylor any of the notices she gets hers from the web. Only send her the ERC Determination paperwork. template -affidavit of service by mailing , DATE: November 3, 2004 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA04-133_ SA-H, ECF, CU-H PROJECT NAME: Parkside at 95 Burnett PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review, Hearing Examiner Site Plan and Hearing Examiner Conditional Use approval tor a 147,430 sq. ft. multi family residential development. The site is 0.83 acres in size and Is relatively flat with no known critical areas. The profect would Include 106 dwelling units, Indoor exercIse room, common areas and service areas within six building levels including four residential, and two levels of structured parking of which one level would be below grade. Ten of the multi family units would be townhouse style and front directly onto Burnett Ave, So. The remaining multi family units would be setback from the street. The structured parking garage would include 181 parking stails of which 46 would be tandem. The applicant Is requesting a conditional use permit In order to increase the density above the maximum of the CD zone. The subject property is located within the Center Downtown (CD) zoning designation, Downtown Core and Urban Center Design Overlay District A. PROJECT LOCATION: 77 & 95 Burnett Avenue South OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE, MITIGATED (DN9-M): As the Lead Agency, the City 01 Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore, as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110, the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS-M process to give notice that a ONS- M is likely to be Issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are Integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Signlficance- Mitlgated (ONS-M). A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: October 26, 2004 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: November 3, 2004 APPUCANTIPROJECT CONTACT PERSON: Kent Smutny, Tel: 425-401-6828; Email: kents@lsaarchitects.com PennltslRevlew Requested: Other Permits which may be required: Requested Studies: Location where application may be reviewed: PUBLIC HEARING: CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: ZonlnglLand Use: Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Development Regulations Used For Project MItigation: Environmental (SEPA) Review, Site Plan, Conditional Use Fire, Construction, Utility, and Building Permits Traffic, Archaeological, Drainage and Geotechnical studies Planning/Bullding/Publlc Works Department, Development Services DiviSion) Sixth Floor Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055 I Public hearing tentatively scheduled for January 11, 2005 before the Renton Hearing Examiner in Renton Council Chambers. Hearings begin at 9:00 AM on tho 7th floor olthe now Renton City Haliloc.ted at lOSS South Grady Way. I The subject site is designated as Center Downtown (CD) on both thl! Comprehensive Plan land Use Map and on the City's Zoning Map. The proposec multi family development appears to be consistent with both designations. SEPA Checklist, Geotechnical and Archaeological studIes The project will be subject to the City's SEPA ordinance, Zoning Code, Publ~ Works Standards, Subdivision Regulations, Unilorm Building and Fire Codes an: other applicable codes and regulations as appropriate. ! , Proposed Mltlgatlon Measures: The following Mitigation Measures will likely be imposed on ~e proposed project. These recommended Mitigation Measures address project Impacts not covered by existing codes and regulations as cited above. The applicant will be required to pay the appropriate Transportation Mitigation Fee; The applicant wifl be required to pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee; and • The applicant will be required to pay the appropriate Parks Mitigation Fee. Comment. on the above application must be submitted In writing to Susan Fiala, Senior Planner, De~elopme~t Services Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055, by 5:00 PM on November 17, 2004. ThIS matter IS also tentatively scheduled lor a public hearing on January 11 2005 at 9:00 AM, Council Chambers, Seventh Floor, Renton City Hall 1055 South Grady Way, Renton. If you are interested in attending the hearing, please contact the Development Services' Division, (425) 430-7282, to ensure that the hearing has not been ~escheduled. If comments cannot be submitted In writing by the date Indicated above, you may still appear at the heaTIng and present your comments on the proposal before the Hearing Examiner. II you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be m~de a.party of record and receive additional Information by mall, please contact the project ~a~ager. ~nyone who submIts written comments wlll automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any dec1s10n on thIS project. CONTACT PERSON: Susan Fiala, Senior Planner; Tel: (425) 430-7382 PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project, complete lhls lorm and return to: City of Renton, Development Planning, 1055 So. Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055_ File NoJName: LUA04-133, SA-H, ECF, CU-H I Park.ide at 95 Bumett NAME: MAIUNGADDRESS: ________________________ _ TELEPHONE NO_: ________ _ CERTIFICATION ......................... """ _ ........ ~\..'lN K.cIA~".t .: '!'r-~ ......... ·...,0 " . : ~ ••• ·;t,\SS/O,v·· •• ~ ", _~1'1 J-r:. ft J~ -.-? : ... O~ <::'-/:\ ~ I, I, ~~~ ,hereb certify that 0 c9piefo~ftHe/-4~).. "%,\ ~ ~ above document were posted by me in conspicuous placc$ ~ or .s~ ~ E ~ the described property on' ~ ~ ,.-\ ... uaue :' ; ~//Jvy#~-?"h,,/ " ...... " 'O;i-;;';"~'1 ATT~ST; S:;s~~~~o~ b~tofe~Not~in and f~tate of \\,,"', .................. .. WaShmgtonreSldmg~1'~-:"1-'J ,onthe ~ dayof~av~ ?M¥ NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (DNS-M) DATE: November 3, 2004 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA04-133, SA-H, ECF, CU-H PROJECT NAME: Parks ide at 95 Burnett PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review: Hearing Examiner Site Plan and Hearing Examiner Conditional Use approval for a 147,430 sq. ft. multi family residential development. The site is 0.83 acres in size and is relatively flat with no known critical areas. The project would include 106 dwelling units, indoor exercise room, common areas and service areas within six building levels including four residential, and two levels of structured parking of which one level would be below grade. Ten of the multi family units would be townhouse style and front directly onto Burnett Ave. So. The remaining multi family units would be setback from the street. The structured parking garage would include 181 parking stalls of which 46 would be tandem. The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit in order to increase the density above the maximum of the CD zone. The subject property is located within the Center Downtown (CD) zoning designation, Downtown Core and Urban Center Design Overlay District A. PROJECT LOCATION: 77 & 95 Burnett Avenue South OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE, MITIGATED (DNS-M): As the Lead Agency, the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore, as permitted under the RCW 43.21 C.11 0, the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS-M process to give notice that a DNS- M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance- Mitigated (DNS-M). A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: October 26, 2004 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: November 3, 2004 APPLICANT/PROJECT CONTACT PERSON: Kent Smutny, Tel: 425-401-6828; Email: kents@tsaarchitects.com Permits/Review Requested: Other Permits which may be required: Requested Studies: Location where application may be reviewed: PUBLIC HEARING: CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Zoning/Land Use: Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: Environmental (SEPA) Review, Site Plan, Conditional Use Fire, Construction, Utility, and Building Permits Traffic, Archaeological, Drainage and Geotechnical studies Planning/Building/Public Works Department, Development Services Division, Sixth Floor Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055 Public hearing tentatively scheduled for January 11, 2005 before the Renton Hearing Examiner in Renton Council Chambers. Hearings begin at 9:00 AM on the 7th floor of the new Renton City Hall located at 1055 South Grady Way. The subject site is designated as Center Downtown (CD) on both the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map and on the City's Zoning Map. The proposed multi family development appears to be consistent with both designations. SEPA Checklist, Geotechnical and Archaeological studies The project will be subject to the City's SEPA ordinance, Zoning Code, Public Works Standards, Subdivision Regulations, Uniform Building and Fire Codes and other applicable codes and regulations as appropriate. Proposed Mitigation Me; 's: The following Mitigation Measures will like' imposed on the proposed project. These recommended Mitigation Measure~ .jress project impacts not covered by existing codes and regulations as cited above. The applicant will be required to pay the appropriate Transportation Mitigation Fee; • The applicant will be required to pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee; and The applicant will be required to pay the appropriate Parks Mitigation Fee, Comments on the above application must be submitted In writing to Susan Fiala, Senior Planner, Development Services Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055, by 5:00 PM on November 17,2004. This matter is also tentatively scheduled for a public hearing on Januarv 11,2005. at 9:00 AM, Council Chambers, Seventh Floor, Renton' City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton. If you are interested in attending the hearing, please contact the Development Services Division, (425) 430-7282, to ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled. If comments cannot be submitted in writing by the date indicated above, you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments on the proposal before the Hearing Examiner. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional information by mail, please contact the project manager. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: Susan Fiala, Senior Planner; Tel: (425) 430-7382 I PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION I .,:": .,' ~:~~mE'S~~ ,~ : .. ,W, ~ . ~ . . .. " . ·.SITE---~~~1ii ... ~ .. ::::::::::::=::::~~:::::::::::::::::==+==+J!:::t:::=~=~~q::::==t.--.... -.... -... _-'--. --- If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project, complete this form and return to: City of Renton, Development Planning, 1055 So. Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. File No./Name: LUA04-133, SA-H, ECF, CU-H / Parkside at 95 Burnett NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO.: CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 3rd day of November, 2004, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Acceptance Letter documents. This information was sent to: Kent Smutny Contact Parkside at 95 Burnett LLC Owner (Signature of Send ~ N~"", '7"~'-""'~~7F::""'--=-----------T~~K1m~. ~"tt, STATE OF WASHINGTON SS COUNTY OF KING '-~" NO],: •• \1\ ~ ... -4-9).. ~ -n ~ '--I. ,()', : "T1 " ~ : ~ :: ~ ~ ... 'Sue ; 'I «\ ... 6!~ .. -: " 0 ... '9'07 •• ' ~ .: I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy Tucker 'I, ~ ~ ........... ~o ...... : signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and volun~f~~~Nr~'" uses and ,\'?~~,,~~ purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated:_~It.....!/"-!:1 ___ L-/;",,;;;O....L.l/_ f Washington Notary {Print}: ___ ----:IVlA~.:"'"J~':"'lt..::..Yf\u:..~ ""'KA=M""'1C .... HE!;;:FF'F--_____________ _ My appointment expires: ivlY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES 6-29-07 Parkside at 95 Burnett LUA04-133, SA-H, ECF, CU-H K.ec:llkillr-Wileel,et'.· Mayor . , November 3, 2004 . KentSmutny, TSA Architec;:ts; PLLC . · 50 116th Avenue SE #201 Bellevue, WA ~a004 Subject: . Parksideat 95 Burnett LUA~04-133, SA~H, Cu-H, ECF Dear Mr. Smutny: . . ··CITY F·RENTON· ',: . , ". ' '. PIanningIBuildlng/Public Works Dep3rtnient .' Gregg ZiJnmerman P.E., Admi~strator The Development Planning Section.' of the City o'fRenton has ,determined that the subject application is completeaccordirlg. tosubmittaLrequ'lrements and, therefore,. is accepted for review. ' " .' .(~ It is teritativelyscheduled forcon!)ideratior:;:by fhe:Environmental Review Committee on .. December 7, 2004~ Prior toth~tre~iew,VQu\vill be 'notified if any additional information · is required to continue prOCs'ssirlgy6Gr'ti'ppHcatlon: ,', .... ".' . . '.' .In addition, this matter hHentativeIY~~hed~ied fora Public' Hearing .on January 11 ,2005 at 9:00AM in theCour)CiICbambers,' Seventh Floor,-Rehton ,City Hall; 1055 South , Grady Way, Renton. The':appllcanforrepresentative(s)of;the' applica.htare'requiredto . · be present at the ,pubHchearirgi'A copy of the 'staff report will be mailed to you· one' week before the he~ring. " ", '," . Please contacfme at (425) 430-7382 if you have any questions . . .... '£2~~ .. ' '.',,' ',> V'/""u'J"~~ . ,. '. '. . . Susan A Fiala, AICP Senior Planner cc: Parkside at 95 Burnett LLC I Owner ~ ------'-,-}-OS-S-s-o-ut-h-G-ra-d-y-W;-ay-.-R-e-n-to-n,-W-:as-h-i-ng-to-n-'-9~8-0-'SS------R E N TON * This paper contains 50% recycled material, 30% post consumer AH'EAD OF THE 'CURVE I~Je Kathy Keollcer-Wheeler, Mayor November 3,2004 Superintendent's Office · Renten Scheel District #403 300' SW7th Street .' Renten,WA 98055-2307 · Subject: Parkside at 95 Burnett LUA-04-133, SA-H, ECF, CU-H CITY· E .RENTON· PlanningiB1liIdinglPublic Works l)epartment . Gregg Zinlmerman P.E., Admilustrator The City of Renten Develepment Servi6~s Division has received an· application for a 106-unit multi-family developmentiocated at 77& 95 Burnett Avenue S. Please see the enclosed Notice · of Application for further details. . .. In order to process this ~pPlication,tl1e'Development SerVi6e~ Division needs tbknow which' Renton 'scheols wouid be attended by c:hildrenliving in residences at the location indicated above. Please fill in the apprbpriateschools on the list below,and return this letter to my attention, Development SerVices Divisien; City of Renton, 1 055 South . Grady Way, Renton, Washington 98055 by November 17,2004,' '. .' ~ . .: . < Middle School: __ ~'--__ ~~-;-:;;-~~_"::""~ _ ___'_-'--_-;-----'----"-~ __ "-'-_--'--'-' . High Schoel: __ ---'-__ ~_;_,_-,---~,--,,----------'-'-:-~--'------'----_'_:_- Will the schools you haveindicatEklb~' able 'tb,halldle theimpaCtof the additional students estimated to come from the proposed:deyelopmEmt? .... "Yes No. . ··Any Comments: _----,-__ ----'---'--_~--------~-'-------,--~'---'--'---~~-- Thank you fOfProvidingthis importantinformation~ If you have any'questions regarding this preject,please contact me at (425) 430 .. 7382. SincerelYi Susan A. Fiala, AICP· Senior Planner Encl. ~ ------7.1 O:=-:;S:-=S-::::S:-ou-th-:--:::G:-ra~d-y ;;-w.;-ay---;R~e-07"to-o-;, w.:=-:a'-s7hlT'"·o-gt:-o-o -=9c;::'SO=-:S""'S:-------RE N TON ® This paper contains 50% recycled material, 30% post consumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE DEVELOPMENT PLANNING City of Renton CITY OF RENTON OCT 2 62004 LAND USE PERMIT RECEIVE~ASTER APPLICATION PROPERTY OWNER(S) PROJECT INFORMATION NAME: Parkside at 95 Burnett LLC PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: Parkside at 95 Burnett ADDRESS: 2256 38th Place East PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION AND ZIP CODE: CITY: Seattle ZIP:98112 77 & 95 Burnett Avenue South 98055 TELEPHONE NUMBER: 206-322-1381 KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): 000720007509,0007200073" APPLICANT (if other than owner) NAME: SAME EXISTING LAND USE(S): Currently vacant site, previously developed with buildings containing retail uses COMPANY (if applicable): PROPOSED LAND USE(S): 106 Unit Apartment Project ADDRESS: EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: CD CITY: ZIP: PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): NA TELEPHONE NUMBER EXISTING ZONING: CD CONTACT PERSON PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): NA NAME: Kent Smutny SITE AREA (in square feet): 36,347sf COMPANY (if applicable): TSA Architects, pllc SQUARE FOOTAGE OF ROADWAYS TO BE DEDICATED FOR SUBDIVISIONS OR PRIVATE STREETS SERVING THREE LOTS OR MORE (if applicable): NA ADDRESS: 50 116th Ave. S.E., Suite 201 PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET CITY: Bellevue ZIP:98004 ACRE (if applicable): 127 NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable): NA TELEPHONE NUMBER AND E-MAIL ADDRESS: 425-401-6828 kents@tsaarchitects.com NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): 106 Q:web/pw/devserv/fonns/planning/masterapp.doc 10/04/04 PF JECT INFORMATION (conti. ~ed) r-----~------~-L----------------------~ NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): None SmJARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): 147,430sf SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): NA SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): NA SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): NA NET FLOOR AREA OF NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): NA NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW PROJECT (if applicable): NA PROJECT VALUE: IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): D AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA ONE D AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA TWO D FLOOD HAZARD AREA sq. ft. D GEOLOGIC HAZARD sq. ft. D HABITAT CONSERVATION sq. ft. D SHORELINE STREAMS AND LAKES sq. ft. D WETLANDS sq. ft. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (Attach legal description on separate sheet with the following information included) SITUATE IN THE SE % OF THE NE QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23N, RANGE 05E WM, IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES List all land use applications being applied for: 1. Site Plan Review ~~ 3, 2, Conditional Use 5fJ!)~ 4. 3. g'\'ltfDTt~ ftAMI·c.wJ 5tJ()~ Staff will calculate applicable fees and postage: $ AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I. (Print Name/str .......... ~·, \\-...... C. . \ ,",\', 'L.-\ s e. A . declare that I am (please check one) _ the current owner of the property involved in this application or =z the authorized representative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and bel\·ef. ~r I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that ..J v.. 0. :1\"\ c... (\', €...I SC2-/\ 9-signed thj'S i ument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the / //. I /) C uses and-urp ses mentioned in the instrument. .~l/, ~ (Signature of Owner/Representative) .11 \\\\\\1111" 111// (Signature of Owner/Representative) ~,,\ N J (ffll. ~"-<O . n ", /' SO <2>' ........... fJ-1 "" f ~ .... ~~tS.SI04' i:.··.~Q'\, ~ My apPointment expires: J!jw\ Z I I ;;Lpo~ ~ Q.: ~ of'~"c:;.-::. § [(,> "OTA,fJ-~\~~ :: ---:= ~ '" \. ..oVBLle / f ~~ .. ~1t R:J'O ... ~ § ~'" ~()·· .. ;.21. '2.~ •••• ~~,.§' "'1 'f: ........ ..t..~"\.t." . '1IIi IVA S\\\"\\"", ~/l.f.fJf 1'1111\\\\ Q:web/pw/devserv/forms/planninglmasterapp.doc 10/04/04 , .. ~ Surrounding Property Owners See Attached '" (Signature of Send N k.,q "~'I, ~----:::':""""';~~:.........5~-~-------------':;:"':-b!~ •••••.... 4,,, " ,: Oll/· ..... ~.'" ,: ~·.-~'I ; \'lOT-4~'" "1'\ ~ SS ... IYJ.. :lJ~ "'1'\ ~ ~ en : -..... m: .-COUNTY OF KING ) ~ -\ \ .,()U8L/C (/).f i I, ~'. .. ,: I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Patrick Roduin ""t ~:?~:~.? ..... ~o~f signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary aot,t~a\~~~and purposes mentioned in the instrument. \\\.",,,,,,,,, Dated: /t/29/~r Notary (Print): ___ ---",M""'A!.".,R~!lYN~KA;=.M:,::;CH~jE::l..oFF!.....--------------- My appointment expires: MY APPOlNiMENTEXPiRES 6-29-07 Parks ide at 95 Burnett LUA04-133, SA-H, ECF, CU-H template -affidavit of service by mailing '# 1 *-----------------MetroScan / King Owner :Sherrill Les R Site :88 Logan Ave S Renton 98055 Mail :42-117 Old Kalanianaole Rd Kailua Hi 96734 Use :005 Res,Fourplex Lgl :TOBIN H H-D C # 37 BEG 730 FT E & Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:2 BldgSF:1,927 # 2 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Caniparoli Louis J Site :84 Logan Ave S Renton 98055 Mail :84 Logan Ave S Renton Wa 98055 Use :006 Res,Single Family Res,Comm Zone Lgl :TOBIN H H-D C # 37 BEG ON E LN OF Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:l.5 BldgSF:1,700 # 3 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Righi Angelo Site :78 Logan Ave S Renton 98055 Mail :1109 N 37th St Renton Wa 98056 Use :006 Res,Single Family Res,Comm Zone Lgl :TOBIN H H-D C # 37 BEG AT A PT Bedrm:4 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:1.5 BldgSF:2,320 # 4 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner Site Mail Use Lgl Bedrm: # 5 :Righi Angelo :78 Logan Ave S Renton 98055 :1109 N 37th St Renton Wa 98056 :006 Res,Single Family Res,Comm Zone :TOBIN H H-D C # 37 BEG AT A PT Bth F3H: / /1 Stories:1 BldgSF:290 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Righi Angelo Site :*no Site Address* Renton Mail :1109 N 37th St Renton Wa 98056 Use Lgl Bedrm: # 6 :309 Vacant, Commercial :TOBIN H H-D C # 37 BEG 810.9 FT E Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Provin William D Site :81 Logan Ave S Renton 98055 Mail :81 Logan Ave S Renton Wa 98055 Use :006 Res,Single Family Res,Comm Zone Lgl :TOBIN H H-D C # 37 BEG 669.8 FT E Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:1 BldgSF:1,640 # 7 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Tharp Juliet Site :75 Logan Ave S Renton 98055 Mail :359 Thomas Ave SW Renton Wa 98055 Use :006 Res,Single Family Res,Comm Zone Lgl :TOBIN H H-D C # 37 BEG 669.8 FT E Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:1 BldgSF:1,780 # 8 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Bonner Pyuong Su Site :518 S Tobin St Renton 98055 Mail :PO Box 853 Bellevue Wa 98009 Use :006 Res,Single Family Res,Comm Zone Lgl :LOT POR TOBIN H H-D C #37 BEG Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:1 BldgSF:1,520 # 9 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Storwick Russell Trust Site :59 Logan Ave S Renton 98055 Mail :1510 9th St Anacorte9 Wa 98221 Use :006 Res,Single Family Res,Comm Zone Lgl :TOBIN H H-D C # 37 BEG 669.8 FT E Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:1 BldgSF:1,900 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON OCT 2 6 2004 ---------------------------* Parcel # :000720 0012 05 Sale Date : 07/03/1984 Sale Price :$67,000 Asd.V :$161,000 Q:NE S:18 T:23N R:05E Ac:.14 YB:1904 Ph: :-------------------------------* Parcel # Sale Date :000720 0013 :03/21/1984 Sale Price Asd.V Q:NE :$81,300 S:18 T:23N R:05E 04 Ac: .09 YB:1924 Ph:425-226-2554 :------------------------~------* Parcel # Sale Date :000720 0014 Sale Price Asd.V :$162,000 S:18 T:23N R:05E 03 Q:NE Ac: .14 YB:1925 Ph:425-271-9730 :-------------------------------* Parcel # Sale Date :000720 0014 Sale Price Asd.V :$162,000 S:18 T:23N R:05E 03 Q:NE Ac: .14 YB:1940 Ph:425-271-9730 :-------------------------------* Parcel # Sale Date Sale Price Asd.V :000720 0015 02 :$47,000 Q:NE S:18 Ac:.09 YB: T:23N R:05E Ph:425-271-9730 :-------------------------------* : 000720 0016 Parcel # Sale Date Sale Price Asd.V :$143,000 S:18 T:23N R:05E 01 Q:NE Ac: .25 YB:1922 Ph:425-255-7281 :-------------------------------* Parcel # Sale Date :000720 0017 :11/27/2002 Sale Price Asd.V :$123,000 S:18 T:23N R:05E YB:1901 Ph: Q:NE Ac: .13 00 :-------------------------------* Parcel # :000720 0041 00 Sale Date :02/01/2001 Sale Price :$47,500 Asd.V :$136,000 Q:NE S:18 T:23N R:05E Ac:.26 YB:1900 Ph: :-------------------------------* Parcel # Sale Date :000720 0043 :01/08/2004 Sale Price Asd.V Q:NE :$125,000 S:18 T:23N R:05E YB:1902 Ph: Ac: .12 08 RECE!VEDformation compiled from various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. '# 10 *----------------- Owner :Austin Walter & Sharoll Site :64 Logan Ave S Renton 98055 MetroScan / King Mail :14823 47th Ave E Tacoma Wa 98446 Use :216 Ind,Service Bldg LgI :TOBIN H H-D C # 37 BEG 811 FT E & Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:1 BldgSF:5,120 # 11 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Dawson James D/Renee .E Site :58 Logan Ave S Renton 98055 Mail :10838 Lake Ridge Dr S Seattle Wa 98178 Use :216 Ind,Service Bldg LgI :TOBIN H H-D C # 37 BEG 810.9 FT E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:1 BldgSF:1,200 # 12 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Starkovich Rudy J Trust Site :75 Burnett Ave S Renton 98055 Mail :810 N Riverside Dr ( No Mail) Renton Wa 98055 Use :309 Vacant, Commercial LgI :TOBIN H H-D C # 37 PAR A OF RENTON Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: # 13 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Stauff Richard J/Betty J Site :13813 139th Ave SE Renton 98059 Mail :13813 139th Ave SE Renton Wa 98059 Use Lgl Bedrm: # 14 :309 Vacant, Commercial :TOBIN H H-D C # 37 BEG 730 FT E OF Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Storwick Russell Trust Site :99 Williams Ave S Renton 98055 Mail :1510 9th St Anacortes Wa 98221 Use :006 Res,Single Family Res,Comm Zone LgI :TOBIN H H-D C # 37 BEG AT NE COR Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:1 BldgSF:880 # 15 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Tennessee Group L L C Site :*no Site Address* Renton Mail :710 S 2nd St Renton Wa 98055 Use :195 Ind,Warehouse Lgl :TOBIN H H-D C # 37 BEG 150 FT N OF Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:1 BldgSF:11,l16 # 16 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Egawa Aileen S Site :91 Williams Ave S Renton 98055 Mail :91 Williams Ave S Renton Wa 98055 Use :006 Res,Single Family Res,Comm Zone LgI :TOBIN H H-D C # 37 BEG ON W LN OF Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/1 / Stories:2 BldgSF:1,810 # 17 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Cooper Robert T Site :87 Williams Ave S Renton 98055 Mail :87 Williams Ave S Renton Wa 98055 Use :006 Res,Single Family Res,Comm Zone Lgl :TOBIN H H-D C # 37 BEG 203 FT N OF Bedrm:4 Bth F3H:1/1 / Stories:1.5 BldgSF:2,050 # 18 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Schmidt Margaret & Robert Site :95 Williams Ave S Renton 98055 Mail :7136 S Sunnycrest Rd Seattle Wa 98178 Use :006 Res,Single Family Res,Comm Zone LgI :TOBIN H H-D C # 37 BEG ON E LN BLK Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:1 BldgSF:1,600 .-------------------------~* Parcel # Sale Date Sale Price Asd.V : 000720 0044 :06/03/1994 :$180,000 :$306,400 S:18 T:23N R:05E 07 Q:NE Ac: .33 YB:1958 Ph:253-531-1934 :-------------------------------* Parcel # :000720 0045 06 Sale Date : 03/20/1998 Sale Price :$127,000 Asd.V :$131,000 Q:NE S:18 T:23N R:05E AC:.19 YB:1976 Ph: :-------------------------------* Parcel # Sale Date : 000720 0075 :07/03/2002 Sale Price Asd.V :$200,100 S:18 T:23N R:05E Q:NE Ac: .46 YB: Ph: 09 :-------------------------------* Parcel # Sale Date Sale Price Asd.V Q:NE S:18 Ac: .06 YB: : 000720 0077 :04/22/1994 :$11,000 Full :$30,100 T:23N R:05E Ph: 07 :-------------------------------* Parcel # Sale Date : 000720 0096 :01/08/2004 Sale Price Asd.V Q:NW :$132,000 S:17 T:23N R:05E YB:1924 Ph: Ac: .13 04 :-------------------------------* Parcel # :000720 0104 04 Sale Date :03/07/1996 Sale Price Asd.V :$152,000 Q:NE S:18 T:23N R:05E Ac: .13 YB:1988 Ph: :-------------------------------* Parcel # :000720 0109 09 Sale Date :08/02/2004 Sale Price :$224,950 Asd.V :$158,000 Q:NW S:17 T:23N R:05E Ac: .13 YB:1930 Ph: :-------------------------------* Parcel # Sale Date : 000720 0118 Sale Price Asd.V Q:NW :$176,000 S:17 T:23N R:05E YB:1936 Ph: Ac: .14 08 :-------------------------------* Parcel # Sale Date : 000720 0122 :04/25/1985 Sale Price Asd.V Q:NW :$131,000 S:17 T:23N R:05E YB:1937 Ph: Ac: .13 02 Information compiled from various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. '# 19 ' *-- - - - - --- - -------' MetroScan / King Owner :Stauff Richard J/BettyAJ Site :101 Burnett Ave S Renton 98055 Mail :13813 139th Ave SE Renton Wa 98059 Use :006 Res,Single Family Res,Comm Zone Lgl :TOBIN H H-D C # 37 BEG AT PT ON W Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:1 BldgSF:780 # 20 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Gudmunson Darreld J & Nancy L Site :513 S Tobin St Renton 98055 Mail :102 Lake Ave S Renton Wa 98055 Use :003 Res,Duplex Lgl :TOBIN H H-D C # 37 BEG 670 FT E & Bedrm:6 Bth F3H:2/ /2 Stories:2 BldgSF:2,390 # 21 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Medzegian James V/Joanne M Site :81 Williams Ave S Renton 98055 Mail :79-81 S Williams Ave Renton Wa 98055 Use :006 Res,Single Family Res,Comm Zone Lgl :TOBIN H H-D C # 37 BEG 203 FT N OF Bedrm:4 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:1.5 BldgSF:2,160 # 22 *-----------------.,.---: MetroScan / King Owner :Meakin Violet Site :75 Williams Ave S Renton 98055 Mail :7100 S Taft St Seattle Wa 98178 Use :006 Res,Single Family Res,Comm Zone Lgl :TOBIN H H-D C # 37 POR TOBIN H Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:1 BldgSF:1,510 # 23 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Medzegian James V/Joanne M Site :79 Williams Ave S Renton 98055 Mail :79-81 S Williams Ave ,Renton Wa 98055 Use :006 Res,Single Family Res,Comm Zone Lgl :TOBIN H H-D C # 37 POR TOBIN H Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:1 BldgSF:2,080 # 24 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner : Salvation Army Site :65 Williams Ave S Renton 98055 Mail :PO Box 9219 Seattle Wa 98109 Use :165 Pub, Church, Religious Services Lgl :TOBIN H H-D C # 37 BEG 411.52 FT N Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:1 BldgSF:7,146 # 25 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Starkovich Rudy J Trust Site :77 Burnett Ave S Renton 98055 Mail :810 N Riverside Dr ( No Mail) Renton Wa 98055 Use :309 Vacant, Commercial Lgl :TOBIN H H-D C # 37 PAR B OF RENTON Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: # 26 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Tennessee Group L L C Site :82 Burnett Ave S Renton Mail :710 S 2nd St Renton Wa 98055 :159 Pub,Parking,Associated :TOBIN H H-D C # 37 BEG ON E MGN Use Lgl Bedrm: # 27 Owner Site Mail Use Lgl Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: *---------------------: MetroScan / King :Tennessee Group L L C :7075 S Tobin St Renton :710 S 2nd St Renton Wa 98055 :159 Pub,Parking,Associated :TOBIN H H-D C # 37 BEG ON E MGN Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: ---------------------------* Parc~l # :000720 0125 09 Sale Date : 04/22/1994 Sale Price :$76,000 Full Asd.V :$116,000 Q:NE S:18 T:23N R:05E Ac:.05 YB:1927 Ph: :-------------------------------* Parcel # :000720 0128 06 Sale Date : 06/09/1989 Sale Price :$122,000 Asd.V :$202,000 Q:NE S:18 T:23N R:05E Ac:.13 YB:1977 Ph: :-------------------------------* Parcel # :000720 0130 02 Sale Date : 07/30/2004 Sale Price :$420,000 Asd.V :$158,000 Q:NW S:17 T:23N R:05E Ac:.12 YB:1937 Ph: :-------------------------------* Parcel # Sale Date Sale Price : 000720 0138 :06/03/1988 Asd.V :$145,000 Q:NW S:17 T:23N R:05E Ac:.13 YB:1939 Ph: 04 :-------------------------------* Parcel # :000720 0139 03 Sale Date :07/30/2004 Sale Price :$420,000 Asd.V :$147,000 Q:NW S:17 T:23N R:05E Ac: .14 YB:1939 Ph: :-------------------------------* Parcel # Sale Date :000720 0140 Sale Price Asd.V Q:NW :$740,900 S:17 T:23N R:05E YB:1985 Ph: Ac: .43 00 :-------------------------------* Parcel # :000720 0148 02 Sale Date : 07/03/2002 Sale Price Asd.V :$165,700 Q:NE S:18 T:23N R:05E Ac: .24 YB: Ph: :-------------------------------* Parcel # Sale Date :000720 0154 :03/07/1996 :$121,700 S:18 T:23N R:05E Sale Price Asd.V Q:NE Ac:.20 YB: Ph: 03 :-------------------------------* Parcel # Sale Date Sale Price Asd.V Q:NE S:18 Ac: .20 YB: :000720 0156 :03/07/1996 :$124,200 T:23N R:05E Ph: 01 Information compiledfrom various sources_ Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report, '# 28 * -- ---------------' Owner :Housing Authority Site :51 Burnett Ave S Renton 98055 Mail :PO Box 2316 Renton Wa 98056 Use :011 Res,Apartment MetroScan / King Lgl :BLK POR LOT POR TOBIN H H-DC #37 Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:4 BldgSF:47,008 # 29 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner Site Mail Use Lgl Bedrm: # 30 :Bnsf Rwy Co :S 2 Burnett Renton :PO Box 961089 Fort Worth Tx 76161 :180 Pub,Parking,Commercial Lot :STR 182305 TAXLOT 262 ABANDONED Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :City Of Renton Site :*no Site Address* Renton Mail :1055 S Grady Way Renton Wa 98055 Use :309 Vacant, Commercial Lgl :STR 182305 TAXLOT 263 ABANDONED Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: # 31 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Calloway William L & Sanford Lorraine M Site :*no Site Address* Renton Mail :55 Williams Ave S #101 Renton Wa 98055 Use :020 Res,Condominium Lgl :LOT UNIT 101 55 WILLIAMS Bedrm:1 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:4 BldgSF:607 # 32 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Frederick Douglas L & Frederick Veda C Site :*no Site Address* Renton Mail :55 Williams Ave S #102 Renton Wa 98055 Use :020 Res,Condominium Lgl :LOT UNIT 102 55 WILLIAMS Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:2/ / Stories:4 BldgSF:1,557 # 33 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Javelli Franca Site :*no Site Address* Renton Mail :55 Williams Ave S #10 ( No Mail) Renton Wa 98055 Use :020 Res,Condominium Lgl :LOT UNIT 103 55 WILLIAMS Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:2/ / Stories:4 BldgSF:957 # 34 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Tonkin Patricia E Site :55 Williams Ave S #104 Renton 98055 Mail :55 Williams Ave S #104 Renton Wa 98055 Use :020 Res,Condominium Lgl :LOT UNIT 104 55 WILLIAMS Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:2/ / Stories:4 BldgSF:956 # 35 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Pope Bruce G/Catherine A Site :*no Site Address* Renton Mail :55 Williams Ave S #105 Renton Wa 98055 Use :020 Res,Condominium Lgl :LOT UNIT 105 55 WILLIAMS Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:2/ / Stories:4 BldgSF:954 # 36 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Handly Rodney E Jr/Linda K Site :55 Williams Ave S #106 Renton 98055 Mail :55 Williams Ave S #106 Renton Wa 98055 Use :020 Res,Condominium Lgl :LOT UNIT 106 55 WILLIAMS Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:2/ / Stories:4 BldgSF:958 ---------------------------* Par~el # :000720 0213 02 Sale Date Sale Price Asd.V :$3,018,000 Q:NE S:18 T:23N R:05E Ac:1.09 YB:1977 Ph: :-------------------------------* Parcel # :182305 9262 02 Sale Date Sale Price Asd.V :$337,500 Q:NE S:18 T:23N R:05E Ac:.64 YB: Ph: :-------------------------------* Parcel # Sale Date Sale Price Asd.V Q:NE S:18 Ac:1.89 YB: :182305 9263 :$988,400 T:23N R:05E Ph: 01 :-------~-----------------------* Parcel # :253902 0010 02 Sale Date :02/28/2003 Sale Price :$157,140 Asd.V :$145,680 Q:NE S:18 T:23N R:05E Ac:.71 YB:2002 Ph: :-------------------------------* Parcel # Sale Date Sale Price Asd.V :253902 0020 :01/21/2003 :$312,385 :$311,400 S:18 T:23N R:05E 00 Q:NE Ac:.71 YB:2002 Ph:425-255-2969 :-------------------------------* Parcel # :253902 0030 08 Sale Date : 01/23/2003 Sale Price :$220,815 Asd.V :$220,100 Q:NE S:18 T:23N R:05E Ac:.71 YB:2002 Ph: :-------------------------------* Parcel # :253902 0040 06 Sale Date :09/30/2003 Sale Price :$233,250 Asd.V :$219,800 Q:NE S:18 T:23N R:05E Ac:.71 YB:2002 Ph: :-------------------------------* Parcel # :253902 0050 03 Sale Date : 11/25/2003 Sale Price :$213,000 Asd.V :$219,400 Q:NE S:18 T:23N R:05E Ac: .71 YB:2002 Ph: :-------------------------------* Parcel # Sale Date Sale Price Asd.V :253902 0060 :07/31/2003 :$225,000 :$220,300 S:18 T:23N R:05E 01 Q:NE Ac:.71 YB:2002 Ph:425-687-7754 Information compiled from various sources, Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. '# 37 ' * _________________ ' MetroScan / King Owner :Pantano Marianne Site :*no Site Address* Renton Mail :55 Williams Ave S #107 Renton Wa 98055 Use :020 Res,Condominium LgI :LOT UNIT 107 55 WILLIAMS Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:2/ / Stories:4 BldgSF:1,556 # 38 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Shantley Harry B/Teresita L Site :55 Williams Ave S #108 Renton 98055 Mail :55 Williams Ave S #108 Renton Wa 98055 Use :020 Res,Condominium LgI :LOT UNIT 108 55 WILLIAMS Bedrm:1 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:4 BldgSF:612 # 39 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Jannsen Gaile F Site :*no Site Address* Renton Mail :55 Williams Ave S #109 Renton Wa 98055 Use :020 Res,Condominium LgI :LOT UNIT 109 55 WILLIAMS Bedrm:1 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:4 BldgSF:671 # 40 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Braaten Ronald & Marie Site :*no Site Address* Renton Mail :55 Williams Ave S #110 Renton Wa 98055 Use :020 Res,Condominium LgI :LOT UNIT 110 55 WILLIAMS Bedrm:1 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:4 BldgSF:625 # 41 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Liquid Properties LIp Site :55 Williams Ave S #201 Renton 98055 Mail :1922 42nd Ave E #22 Seattle Wa 98112 Use :020 Res,Condominium LgI :LOT UNIT 201 55 WILLIAMS Bedrm:1 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:4 BldgSF:981 # 42 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Leitner Pilla A & Edward F Site :*no Site Address* Renton Mail :55 Williams Ave S #202 Renton Wa 98055 Use :020 Res,Condominium LgI :LOT UNIT 202 55 WILLIAMS Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:2/ / Stories:4 BldgSF:1,632 # 43 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Bragg Florence E Site :*no Site Address* Renton Mail :55 Williams Ave S #203 Renton Wa 98055 Use :020 Res,Condominium LgI :LOT UNIT 203 55 WILLIAMS Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:2/ / Stories:4 BldgSF:973 # 44 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Pearson Marilyn B Site :*no Site Address* Renton Mail :55 Williams Ave S #204 Renton Wa 98055 Use :020 Res,Condominium LgI :LOT UNIT 204 55 WILLIAMS Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:2/ / Stories:4 BldgSF:978 # 45 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Clow Family Trust Site :*no Site Address* Renton Mail :55 Williams Ave S #203 Renton Wa 98055 Use :020 Res,Condominium Lgl :LOT UNIT 205 55 WILLIAMS Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:2/ / Stories:4 BldgSF:978 ---------------------------* Parcel # :253902 0070 09 Sale Date :02/28/2003 Sale Price :$300,000 Asd.V :$311,200 Q:NE S:18 T:23N R:05E Ac:.71 YB:2002 Ph: :-------------------------------* Parcel # Sale Date :253902 0080 :08/29/2003 :$149,950 :$146,800 S:18 T:23N R:05E 07 Sale Price Asd.V Q:NE Ac:.71 YB:2002 Ph:425-277-7768 :-------------------------------* Parcel # :253902 0090 05 Sale Date : 02/14/2003 Sale Price :$156,160 Asd.V :$161,000 Q:NE S:18 T:23N R:05E Ac:.71 YB:2002 Ph: :-------------------------------* Parcel # :253902 0100 03 Sale Date :01/27/2003 Sale Price :$153,490 Asd.V :$150,000 Q:NE S:18 T:23N R:05E Ac: .71 YB:2002 Ph: :-------------------------------* Parcel # :253902 0110 01 Sale Date :07/29/2004 Sale Price :$179,300 Asd.V :$196,200 Q:NE S:18 T:23N R:05E Ac:.71 YB:2002 Ph: :-------------------------------* Parcel # Sale Date : 253902 0120 : 05/11/2004 Sale Price Asd.V Q:NE Ac:.71 :$326,400 S:18 T:23N R:05E YB:2002 Ph: 09 :-------------------------------* Parcel # Sale Date :253902 0130 :02/07/2003 :$227,010 :$223,700 S:18 T:23N R:05E 07 Sale Price Asd.V Q:NE Ac:.71 YB:2002 Ph:425-271-1187 :-------------------------------* Parcel # Sale Date :253902 0140 :05/23/2003 :$227,990 :$224,900 S:18 T:23N R:05E 05 Sale Price Asd.V Q:NE Ac:.71 YB:2002 Ph:425-271-8822 :-------------------------------* Parcel # Sale Date :253902 0150 : 09/11/2003 :$220,000 :$224,900 S:18 T:23N R:05E 02 Sale Price Asd.V Q:NE Ac:.71 YB:2002 Ph:425-255-5339 Information compiled from various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. '# 46 . *-----------------MetroScan / King Owner :Bates Joan B Site :*no Site Address* Renton Mail :55 Williams Ave S #206 Renton Wa 98055 Use :020 Res,Condominium Lgl :LOT UNIT 206 55 WILLIAMS Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:2/ / Stories:4 BldgSF:977 # 47 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Mckinney Louise J & Samuel B Site :*no Site Address* Renton Mail :55 Williams Ave S #207 Renton Wa 98055 Use :020 Res,Condominium Lgl :LOT UNIT 207 55 WILLIAMS Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:2/ / Stories:4 BldgSF:1,620 # 48 *------------------~--: MetroScan / King Owner :Hori Jay Ti+ Site : *no Site Address* Ren'ton Mail :15 S Grady Way #249 Renton Wa 98055 Use :020 Res,Condominium Lgl :LOT UNIT 208 55 WILLIAMS Bedrm:1 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:4 BldgSF:985 # 49 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Centex Homes Site :*no Site Address* Renton Mail :2320 130th Ave NE Bellevue Wa 98005 Use :020 Res,Condominium Lgl :LOT UNIT 209 55 WILLIAMS Bedrm:1 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:4 BldgSF:977 # 50 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Stenklyft Jason L Site :55 Williams Ave S #301 Renton 98055 Mail :55 Williams Ave S #301 Renton Wa 98055 Use :020 Res,Condominium Lgl :LOT UNIT 301 55 WILLIAMS Bedrm:1 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:4 BldgSF:983 # 51 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Parmele Robert L Site :55 Williams Ave S #302 Renton 98055 Mail :55 Williams Ave S #302 Renton Wa 98055 Use :020 Res,Condominium Lgl :LOT UNIT 302 55 WILLIAMS Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:2/ / Stories:4 BldgSF:1,626 # 52 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Hiersche Paul.ine P & Hiersch Edgar L Site :*no Site Address* Renton Mail :55 Williams Ave S #303 Renton Wa 98055 Use :020 Res,Condominium Lgl :LOT UNIT 303 55 WILLIAMS Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:2/ / Stories:4 BldgSF:976 # 53 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Brown Mary Site :55 Williams Ave S #304 Renton 98055 Mail :55 Williams Ave S #304 Renton Wa 98055 Use :020 Res,Condominium Lgl :LOT UNIT 304 55 WILLIAMS Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:2/ / Stories:4 BldgSF:978 # 54 *-----------------~---: MetroScan / King Owner :Little Ivona Site :*no Site Address* Renton Mail :55 Williams Ave S #305 Renton Wa 98055 Use :020 Res,Condominium Lgl :LOT UNIT 305 55 WILLIAMS Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:2/ / Stories:4 BldgSF:977 ---------------------------* Parcel # Sale Date Sale Price Asd.V :253902 0160 : 12/11/2003 :$224,000 :$224,700 S:18 T:23N R:05E 00 Q:NE Ac: _71 YB:2002 Ph:425-277-4328 :-------------------------------* Parcel # :253902 0170 08 Sale Date :03/31/2003 Sale Price :$331,085 Asd.V :$324,000 Q:NE S:18 T:23N R:05E Ac:.71 YB:2002 Ph: :-------------------------------* Parcel # Sale Date :253902 0180 :07/16/2004 Sale Price Asd.V :$197,000 S:18 T:23N R:05E YB:2002 Ph: Q:NE Ac:.71 06 :-------------------------------* Parcel # :253902 0190 04 Sale Date Sale Price Asd.V :$195,400 Q:NE S:18 T:23N R:05E Ac:.71 YB:2002 Ph: :-------------------------------* Parcel # :253902 0200 02 Sale Date : 09/26/2003 Sale Price :$213,000 Asd.V :$201,600 Q:NE S:18 T:23N R:05E Ac:.71 YB:2002 ph: :-------------------------------* Parcel # :253902 0210 00 Sale Date : 06/06/2003 Sale Price :$329,950 Asd_V :$330,200 Q:NE S:18 T:23N R:05E Ac: .71 YB:2002 Ph: :-------------------------------* Parcel # :253902 0220 08 Sale Date : 01/30/2003 Sale Price :$231,990 Asd.V :$229,400 Q:NE S:18 T:23N R:05E Ac:_71 YB:2002 Ph: :-------------------------------* Parcel # :253902 0230 06 Sale Date : 03/08/2004 Sale Price :$224,000 Asd.V :$229,900 Q:NE S:18 T:23N R:05E Ac:.71 YB:2002 Ph: :-------------------------------* Parcel # Sale Date Sale Price Asd.V :253902 0240 :01/14/2004 :$239,570 :$229,700 Q:NE Ac:.71 S:18 T:23N R:05E YB:2002 ph: 04 Information compiledfrom various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. # 55 . *-----------------MetroScan / King Owner :Goodwin Jane M Site :*no Site Address* Renton Mail :55 Williams Ave S #306 Renton Wa 98055 Use :020 Res,Condominium Lgl :LOT UNIT 306 55 WILLIAMS Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:2/ / Stories:4 BldgSF:980 # 56 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Leroy Harry K/Debra J Site :55 Williams Ave S #307 Renton 98055 Mail :55 Williams Ave S #307 Renton Wa 98055 Use :020 Res,Condominium LgI :LOT UNIT 307 55 WILLIAMS Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:2/ / Stories:4 BldgSF:1,621 # 57 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Cameron Eric Site :*no Site Address* Renton Mail :55 Williams Ave S #308 Renton Wa 98055 Use :020 Res,Condominium Lgl :LOT UNIT 308 55 WILLIAMS Bedrm:1 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:4 BldgSF:986 # 58 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Laville Jenny M Site :*no Site Address* Renton Mail :55 Williams Ave S #309 Renton Wa 98055 Use :020 Res,Condominium Lgl :LOT UNIT 309 55 WILLIAMS Bedrm:1 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:4 BldgSF:978 # 59 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Ellingson Mary A Site :*no Site Address* Renton Mail :55 Williams Ave S #401 Renton Wa 98055 Use :020 Res,Condominium Lgl :LOT UNIT 401 55 WILLIAMS Bedrm:1 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:4 BldgSF:893 # 60 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Wilson Joan M Site :55 Williams Ave S #402 Renton 98055 Mail :55 Williams Ave S #402 Renton Wa 98055 Use :020 Res,Condominium Lgl :LOT UNIT 402 55 WILLIAMS Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:2/ / Stories:4 BldgSF:1,433 # 61 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Clark Donald T Site :55 Williams Ave S #403 Renton 98055 Mail :55 Williams Ave S #403 Renton Wa 98055 Use :020 Res,Condominium Lgl :LOT UNIT 403 55 WILLIAMS Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:2/ / Stories:4 BldgSF:956 # 62 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Karpiak Victor/Robbi D Site :55 Williams Ave S #404 Renton 98055 Mail :55 Williams Ave S #404 Renton Wa 98055 Use :020 Res,Condominium Lgl :LOT UNIT 404 55 WILLIAMS Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:2/ / Stories:4 BldgSF:957 # 63 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Mangubat Alindrina A Site :*no Site Address* Renton Mail :55 Williams Ave S #405 Renton Wa 98055 Use :020 Res,Condominium Lgl :LOT UNIT 405 55 WILLIAMS Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:2/ / Stories:4 BldgSF:954 ---------------------------* Parcel # :253902 0250 01 Sale Date : 04/30/2004 Sale Price :$229,950 Asd.V :$230,400 Q:NE S:18 T:23N R:05E Ac: .71 YB:2002 Ph: :-------------------------------* Parcel # :253902 0260 09 Sale Date : 06/25/2003 Sale Price :$334,995 Asd.V :$329,200 Q:NE S:18 T:23N R:05E Ac: .71 YB:2002 Ph: :-------------------------------~ :253902 0270 :02/04/2004 Parcel # Sale Date Sale Price Asd.V :$202,200 S:18 T:23N R:05E 07 Q:NE Ac:.71 YB:2002 Ph:425-277-0112 :-------------------------------* Parcel # :253902 0280 05 Sale Date : 08/04/2004 Sale Price :$199,500 Asd.V :$200,600 Q:NE S:18 T:23N R:05E Ac:.71 YB:2002 Ph: :-------------------------------* Parcel # :253902 0290 03 Sale Date : 06/22/2004 Sale Price :$215,000 Asd.V :$193,600 Q:NE S:18 T:23N R:05E Ac:.71 YB:2002 Ph: :-------------------------------* Parcel # Sale Date :253902 0300 :09/25/2003 Sale Price Asd.V :$301,600 S:18 T:23N R:05E YB:2002 Ph: Q:NE Ac:.71 01 :-------------------------------* Parcel # :253902 0310 09 Sale Date : 03/15/2004 Sale Price :$229,840 Asd.V :$234,800 Q:NE S:18 T:23N R:05E Ac:.71 YB:2002 Ph: :-------------------------------* Parcel # :253902 0320 07 Sale Date : 11/07/2003 Sale Price :$250,000 Asd.V :$235,100 Q:NE S:18 T:23N R:05E Ac:.71 YB:2002 Ph: :-------------------------------* Parcel # Sale Date Sale Price Asd.V :253902 0330 :12/29/2003 :$234,905 :$234,400 S:18 T:23N R:05E 05 Q:NE Ac:.71 YB:2002 Ph:425-204-8492 Information compiled from various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. '# 64 . *--~--------------MetroScan / King Owner :Llewellyn Shirley A Site :55 Williams Ave S #406 Renton 98055 Mail :55 Williams Ave S #406 Renton Wa 98055 Use :020 Res,Condominium Lgl :LOT UNIT 406 55 WILLIAMS Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:2/ / Stories:.4 BldgSF:954 # 65 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Smith Lois May Site :*no Site Address* Renton Mail :55 Williams Ave S #407 Renton Wa 98055 Use :020 Res,Condominium Lgl :LOT UNIT 407 55 WILLIAMS Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:2/ / Stories:4 BldgSF:1,428 # 66 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Baxter Bonnie J Site :*no Site Address* Renton Mail :55 Williams Ave S #408 Renton Wa 98055 Use :020 Res,Condominium Lgl :LOT UNIT 408 55 WILLIAMS Bedrm:1 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:4 BldgSF:841 # 67 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Babcock Stefani D Site :*no Site Address* Renton Mail :55 Williams Ave S #409 Renton Wa 98055 Use :020 Res,Condominium Lgl :LOT UNIT 409 55 WILLIAMS Bedrm:1 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:4 BldgSF:894 # 68 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Sigette Marylou Site :117 Logan Ave S Renton 98055 Mail :117 Logan Ave S Renton Wa 98055 Use :006 Res,Single Family Res,Comm Zone Lgl :BLK 3 LOT 6 MOTOR LINE ADD TO Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:1 BldgSF:980 # 69 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Kowing Terry L Site :*no Site Address* Renton Mail :109 Logan Ave S Renton Wa 98055 Use :309 Vacant, Commercial- Lgl :BLK 3 LOT 7 MOTOR LINE ADD TO Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: # 70 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Kowing Terry L Site :109 Logan Ave S Renton 98055 Mail :109 Logan Ave S Renton Wa 98055 Use :006 Res,Single Family Res,Comm Zone Lgl :BLK 3 LOT 8 MOTOR LINE ADD TO Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:1.5 BldgSF:1,270 # 71 *-----------------~-.,.--: MetroScan / King Owner Site Mail Use Lgl Bedrm: # 72 :Pan's Development Corporation :120 Logan Ave S Renton 98055 :6947 Coal Creek Pkwy SE #260 Newcastle Wa 98059 :309 Vacant, Commercial :BLK 3 LOT 9 MOTOR LINE ADD TO Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Starkovich Beverly J Site :103 Logan Ave S Renton 98055 Mail :810 N Riverside Dr (No Mail Renton Wa 98055 Use :006 Res,Single Family Res,Comm Zone Lgl :BLK 3 LOT 10 MOTOR LINE ADD TO Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:1 BldgSF:1,950 ._-------------------------* ParLel # :253902 0340 03 Sale Date : 02/13/2004 Sale Price :$229,000 Asd.V :$234,400 Q:NE S:18 T:23N R:05E Ac:.71 YB:2002 Ph: :-------------------------------* Parcel # :253902 0350 00 Sale Date :02/14/2003 Sale Price :$325,120 Asd.V :$300,600 Q:NE S:18 T:23N R:05E Ac: .71 YB:2002 Ph: :-------------------------------* Parcel # :253902 0360 08 Sale Date : 02/12/2003 Sale Price :$186,260 Asd.V :$183,200 Q:NE S:18 T:23N R:05E Ac: .71 YB:2002 Ph: :-------------------------------* Parcel # Sale Date :253902 0370 :01/29/2003 :$191,600 :$193,800 S:18 T:23N R:05E 06 Sale Price Asd.V Q:NE Ac:.71 YB:2002 Ph:425-235-8502 :-----------------------------~-* Parcel # Sale Date :569600 0165 :06/26/2003 :$178,000 :$127,000 Sale Price Asd.V Q:NE S:18 T:23N R:05E 09 Ac: .11 YB:1900 Ph:425-228-8120 :-------------------------------* Parcel # Sale Date Sale Price Asd.V Q:NE S:18 Ac: .11 YB: :569600 0169 :06/06/1996 :$75,000 Full :$60,000 T:23N R:05E ph: 05 :-------------------------------* Parcel # :569600 0170 02 Sale Date : 06/06/1996 Sale Price :$75,000 Full Asd.V :$134,000 Q:NE S:18 T:23N R:05E Ac:.11 YB:1900 Ph: :------------------------------~* Parcel # :569600 0180 00 Sale Date : 01/29/1999 Sale Price :$62,000 Full Asd.V :$57,400 Q:NE S:18 T:23N R:05E Ac:.11 YB: ph: :-------------------------------* Parcel # Sale Date : 569600 0185 :03/29/2002 :$200,000 :$137,000 Sale Price Asd.V Q:NE S:18 T:23N R:05E Ac: .10 YB:1938 Ph: 05 Infonnation compiled from various sources, Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. "' # 73' *-----------------MetroScan / King Owner :Knippel John P/JackieD Site :97 Logan Ave S Renton 98055 Mail :97 Logan Ave S Renton Wa 98055 Use :006 Res,Single Family Res,Comm Zone LgI :BLK 3 LOT 11-12 MOTOR LINE ADD TO Bedrm:4 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:1.5 BldgSF:1,420 # 74 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Washington Mutual Savgings Bank Site :150 Logan Ave S Renton 98055 Mail :PO Box 7788 Newport Beach Ca 92658 Use :162 Pub,Bank LgI :BLK 4 LOT 1-2 MOTOR LINE ADD TO Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:2 BldgSF:7,294 # 75 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Zug Bryan H/Jennifer L Site :117 Burnett PI S Renton 98055 Mail :117 Burnett PI S Renton Wa 98055 Use :006 Res,Single Family Res,Comm Zone LgI :BLK 4 LOT 6 MOTOR LINE ADD TO Bedrm:4 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:1.5 BldgSF:2,230 # 76 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Sigette Mary Lou Site :116 Logan Ave S Renton 98055 Mail :116 Logan Ave S Renton Wa 98055 Use :003 Res, Duplex LgI :BLK 4 LOT 6 MOTOR LINE ADD TO Bedrm:4 Bth F3H:2/ / Stories:2 BldgSF:4,350 # 77 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Nguyen Thanh M Site :113 Burnett PI S Renton 98055 Mail: 713 SW 353rd PI Federal Way Wa 98023 Use :006 Res,Single Family Res,Comm Zone LgI :BLK 4 LOT 7 MOTOR LINE ADD TO Bedrm:6 Bth F3H:2/ / Stories:1.5 BldgSF:2,520 # 78 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :212 Wells Llc Site :108 Logan Ave S Renton 98055 Mail :212 Wells Ave S #J Renton Wa 98055 Use :006 Res,Single Family Res,Comm Zone LgI :BLK 4 LOT 8 MOTOR LINE ADD TO Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:1/ /1 Stories:2 BldgSF:910 # 79 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Lu Khanh C/Hoa Li+ Site :106 Logan Ave S Renton 98055 Mail :13414 SE 85th St Renton Wa 98059 Use :006 Res,Single Family Res,Comm Zone LgI :BLK 4 LOT 9 MOTOR LINE ADD TO Bedrm:4 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:1.5 BldgSF:1,660 # 80 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Stauff Richard J Site :100 Logan Ave S Renton 98055 Mail :13813 139th Ave SE Renton Wa 98059 Use :005 Res,Fourplex LgI :BLK 4 LOT 10-11 MOTOR LINE ADD TO Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:1 BldgSF:1,908 # 81 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Stauff Richard J/Betty J Site :96 Logan Ave S Renton 98055 Mail :13813 139th Ave SE Renton Wa 98059 Use :006 Res,Single Family Res,Comm Zone LgI :BLK 4 LOT 11-12 MOTOR LINE ADD TO Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:1 BldgSF:950 ._-------------------------* Parcel # :569600 0190 08 Sale Date : 11/25/1998 Sale Price :$153,000 Full Asd.V :$145,000 Q:NE S:18 T:23N R:05E Ac:.13 YB:1905 Ph: :-------------------------------* Parcel # :569600 0200 06 Sale Date : 12/01/1993 Sale Price :$1,267,600 Full Asd.V :$741,600 Q:NE S:18 T:23N R:05E Ac:.46 YB:1968 Ph: :-------------------------------* Parcel # Sale Date :569600 0225 :10/01/2003 :$208,950 :$141,000 Sale Price Asd.V Q:NE S:18 T:23N R:05E 07 Ac: .07 YB:1910 Ph:425-687-7852 :-------------------------------* Parcel # Sale Date :569600 0235 :05/24/1988 Sale Price Asd.V :$192,000 S:18 T:23N R:05E YB:1902 Ph: Q:NE Ac: .09 05 :-------------------------------* Parcel # Sale Date :569600 0245 :09/24/2003 Sale Price Asd.V :$157,000 S:18 T:23N R:05E YB:1900 Ph: Q:NE Ac: .14 03 :-------------------------------* Parcel # :569600 0250 05 Sale Date : 03/18/2003 Sale Price :$160,000 Asd.V :$122,000 Q:NE S:18 T:23N R:05E Ac:.12 YB:1902 Ph: :-------------------------------* P~rcel # :569600 0255 00 Sale Date : 03/08/2001 Sale Price :$130,000 Asd.V :$122,000 Q:NE S:18 T:23N R:05E Ac:.11 YB:1904 Ph: :-------------------------------* Parcel # Sale Date :569600 0260 Sale Price Asd.V :$170,000 S:18 T:23N R:05E YB:1953 Ph: Q:NE Ac: .16 03 :-------------------------------* Parcel # :569600 0261 02 Sale Date : 07/10/1998 Sale Price :$120,000 Full Asd.V :$118,000 Q:NE S:18 T:23N R:05E Ac: .08 YB:1908 Ph: Information compiled from various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. *-----------------' --,\ MetroScan / King Owner :Kaercher Richard K & .. aren Site :107 Burnett Ave S Renton 98055 Mail :PO Box 8 Hobart Wa 98025 Use :003 Res,Duplex Lgl :BLK 4 LOT 13 MOTOR LINE ADD TO Bedrm:2 .Bth F3H:2/ / Stories:1 BldgSF:1,360 # 83 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Erue Donald C Site :101 Burnett Ave S Renton 98055 Mail :14415 12th Ave SW Seattle Wa 98166 Use :195 Ind,Warehouse Lgl :BLK 4 LOT 13 & MOTOR'LINE ADD TO Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:1 BldgSF:1,152 # 84 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Erue Donald C Site :101 Burnett Ave S Renton 98055 Mail :14415 12th Ave SW Seattle Wa 98166 Use :195 Ind,Warehouse Lgl :BLK 4 LOT 13 & MOTOR LINE ADD TO Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:1 BldgSF:864 # 85 * --- --- ---- ---- - ------ : MetroScan / King :Kaercher Richard K/Karen :115 Burnett Ave S Renton 98055 :PO Box 8 Hobart Wa 98025 :101 Com,Retail Store :BLK 4 LOT 13 MOTOR LINE ADD TO Owner Site Mail Use Lgl Bedrm: # 86 Bth F3H: / / Stories:1 BldgSF:715 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Heitman Ruby C;Heitman-boden Sandra Site :50 Logan Ave S Renton 98055 Mail :50 Logan Ave S Renton Wa 98055 Use :003 Res,Duplex Lgl :BLK 6 LOT 1-2 RENTON REAL ESTATE Bedrm:5 Bth F3H:2/ / Stories:1.5 BldgSF:3,750 # 87 *---------------------: MetroScan / King :City Of Renton :*no Site Address* Renton :1055 S Grady Way Renton Wa 98055 :309 Vacant, Commercial :BLK 6 LOT 2-3 RENTON REAL ESTATE Owner Site Mail Use Lgl Bedrm: # 88 Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Reynolds Glenn D Site :55 Logan Ave S Renton 98055 Mail :55 Logan Ave S Renton Wa 98055 Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Lgl :BLK 7 LOT 1 RENTON REAL ESTATE COS Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:1 BldgSF:1,740 # 89 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Boland James M Site :51 Logan Ave S Renton 98055 Mail :51 Logan Ave S Renton Wa 98055 Use :006 Res,Single Family Res,Comm Zone Lgl :BLK 7 LOT 2 RENTON REAL ESTATE COS Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:1.5 BldgSF:1,820 # 90 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Mclendon Hardware Inc Site :104 Burnett Ave S Renton 98055 Mail :710 S 2nd St Renton Wa 98055 Use Lgl Bedrm: :101 Com, Retail Store :BLK 24 LOT 1 THRU 4 & RENTON TOWN Bth F3H: / / Stories:1 BldgSF:12,906 .--------------------------* Parcel # Sale Date :569600 0275 :01/21/2003 Sale Price Asd.V Q:NE :$153,000 S:18 T:23N R:05E YB:1929 Ph: Ac: .10 06 :-------------------------------* Parcel # :569600 0276 05 Sale Date :04/04/1995 Sale Price :$120,000 Full Asd.V :$190,800 Q:NE S:18 T:23N R:05E Ac:.19 YB:1958 Ph: :-------------------------------* Parcel # :569600 0276 05 Sale Date :04/04/1995 Sale Price :$120,000 Full Asd.V :$190,800 Q:NE S:18 T:23N R:05E Ac:.19 YB:1998 ph: :-------------------------------* Parcel # Sale Date :569600 0277 :01/28/2003 Sale Price Asd.V Q:NE Ac:.03 :$103,900 S:18 T:23N R:05E YB:1920 Ph: 04 :-------------------------------* Parcel # Sale Date : 722930 0600 : 09/26/1995 Sale Price Asd.V Q:NE :$196,000 S:18 T:23N R:05E YB:1922 Ph: Ac: .14 08 :-------------------------------* Parcel # Sale Date Sale Price Asd.V Q:NE S:18 Ac: .14 YB: : 722930 0610 :$72,900 T:23N R:05E Ph: 06 :-------------------------------* Parcel # Sale Date : 722930 0630 :12/17/1990 Sale Price Asd.V Q:NE :$128,000 S:18 T:23N R:05E YB:1925 Ph: Ac: .12 02 :-------------------------------* Parcel # :722930 0635 07 Sale Date : 12/31/2001 Sale Price :$49,395 Asd.V :$138,000 Q:NE S:18 T:23N R:05E Ac: .10 YB:1916 ph: :-------------------------------* Parcel # Sale Date Sale Price :723150 2030 Asd.V :$758,300 Q:NW S:17 T:23N R:05E Ac:1.17 YB:1980 Ph: 05 Information compiled from various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. *-----------------MetroScan / King Owner :Cugini Alex Jr Site :710 S 2nd St Renton 98055 Mail :611 Renton Ave S Renton Wa 98055 Use :101 Com, Retail Store LgI :BLK 24 LOT 5 THRU 15 RENTON TOWN Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:1 BldgSF:35,936 # 92 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner Site Mail Use LgI Bedrm: # 93 Owner Site Mail Use LgI Bedrm: # 94 :Tennessee Group Llc :111 williams Ave S Renton 98055 :710S 2nd St Renton Wa 98055 :106 Off,Office Building :BLK 24 LOT 18 RENTON.TOWN OF LESS Bth F3H: / / Stories:1 BldgSF:5,508 *---------------------: MetroScan / King :Storwick Russell Trust :115 Williams Ave S Renton 98055 :1510 9th St Anacortes Wa 98221 :195 Ind,Warehouse :BLK 24 LOT 19 RENTON TOWN OF LESS Bth F3H: / / Stories:1 BldgSF:4,625 *---------------------: MetroScan / King OWner :Storwick Russell Trust Site :101 Williams Ave S Renton 98055 Mail :1510 9th St Anacortes Wa 98221 Use :003 Res,Duplex LgI :BLK 24 LOT 20 RENTON TOWN OF LESS Bedrm:8 Bth F3H:2/ / Stories:1.5 BldgSF:2,860 ._-------------------------* ParL~1 # :723150 2085 09 Sale Date :06/10/1986 Sale Price Asd.V :$2,047,200 Q:NW S:17 T:23N R:05E Ac:1.52 YB:1981 Ph: :-------------------------------* Parcel # :723150 2120 06 Sale Date : 04/20/1998 Sale Price :$400,000 Full Asd.V :$445,200 Q:NW S:17 T:23N R:05E Ac: .13 YB:1968 Ph: :-------------------------------* Parcel # :723150 2125 01 Sale Date : 01/08/2004 Sale Price Asd.V :$270,500 Q:NW S:17 T:23N R:05E Ac:.13 YB:1957 Ph: :-------------------------------* :723150 2130 :01/08/2004 Parcel # Sale Date Sale Price Asd.V Q:NW :$189,000 S:17 T:23N R:05E YB:1929 Ph: Ac: .13 04 Information compiledfrom various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISIO! WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS !/!!!Y!.)·I\rr:/QtT:'M~~~(~g:t//// /~~i~T:)(imRijil\):))))!.!)!)J!!U!/)):).R#~~~I*~!))iC··i!)!!>}))}.! Calculations 1 , ;, f.()i()r.~~:~~~:~()r:~iSJ:il.ay::~:::::::>::>:::::::::::<::::::::::::::::::::::::: :<::::::::::::::::<:::::: ::\::>::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::<:::::::::::::::::::::::::>:::::::::::::::::::::<::)::::::::::< Construction Mitigation Description 2 AND 4 :t¥.n~!tY:W~~s~~~~:~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: Drainage Control Plan 2 :i?#.i~~~¢:R~p.M:~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: Elevations, Architectural3AND4 / :$.~~~t9B~~~i:¢h~~~ii~~:~::::::: :::::::: :::: :::: :::::::::::: ::::::: :::::::: :::::: ::: ::::::::::::::: ::: ::: :::::::::: :::::::: :::: ::::::::::::: :::: :::: :: :::::::::: :::::::::::: :::::::: ::::: :::::: ::::::::::: ::::::::: :::::::: :::::::: :::: :::::::: :::::: Existing Covenants (Recorded Copy) 4 . . . . .. ............. ............................. . . . . " . .... . ........................................................................ . :E~ist!i:ig:lt~e~t~:~ei#.~~~:¢QP'Yj:f:::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: Flood Hazard Data4 ~ . :f:!Qi)r.:P~~~:~:ki~~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::;:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: Geotechnical Report 2 AND 3 :G.~a~i~tj:f:!i~~;:¢~2~pt~~(~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: Grading Plan, Detailed 2 :~~~i~f9~~~:R#.9~1::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: King County Assessor's Map Indicating Site4 :Yin~~#'P"D~:f:I~~;:~~¥'i#y#i:~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: Legal Description 4 :~j$iAf::$.~~r:8¥.~fii~::f:it.~~:~D~~~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: Mailing Labels for Proper:tY O'vVn~rs 4 :M~p:~f::$.i~B~:~'~:9.~~ii!8#.:~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: Master Application Form 4 :M~h~~~¢~i~~::{@.:~:~~h~~~~tj:~::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: Neighborhood Detail Map 4 This requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services Section 2. Public Works Plan Review Section 3. Building Section 4. Development Planning Section PROJECT NAME: Pac/;.SIU DATE: • loj;q(l£ Q:\WEB\Pw\OEVSERv\Forms\Planning\waiver.xls 01/0612004 EVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION , WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS :/.:U·:::::.:.W~~:~lat1IMt~¥:~m6fu:)::)H\.).:~;tJt::> ?~A~~E:g:UU?::::/::(::::::<§e~~~#:{·:<C:::::/H:.>.: Parking, Lot Coverage & Landscaping Analysis 4 () f"v Jt'k j)~ fAJV-f.r(fA1tt p:1~il:R.@'~~~:(p::M1s}.~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::~::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: Postage 4 r~ap'p!i~t!~f:{M~i~9~~#~Jj:~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::~:::::::::::::::::::::~: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: Public Works Approval Letter2 ~~@t#!~t~~~~:R~~:~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: Screening Detail 4 ~~te::F.iI~~:~:~~~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: Street Profiles 2 ffi!~:~~P.8~:¥':~!~~:9.~if~~#:~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::~:::::::::::~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ~ .(opography Map 3. /'AJ t::fJ ~ j!:l::JJ1{¢ OJ:::ar t~~~~:~t~~y::~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::7?:{:::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::~::::::::::::::::::::l::::::::;:::;:;:~22Q t/ Tree Cutting/Land Clearing Plan 4 " . : '. ': :"':,~~-",-.;:~. ,." .• ' .. ' . :::. ~f:~::¢~1~f:#~'9~:9Y~~~yt>~~9~:~~~~::::::::::::: ::::s:::::::~:~:::::::~:: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::JfJi-;:'~r;:~;/::(;~;1;~::~.;<;7.':;:::~::::::7TI Utilities Plan, Generalized 2 w~li~~:Mi~tiri~:~~:F.~:4::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::ta&::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: Wetlands Mitigation Plan, Preliminary 4 ~ Wireless: Applicant Agreement Statement 2 AND 3 Inventory of Existing Sites 2 AND. 3 Lease Agreement, Draft 2 AND 3 Map of Existing Site Conditions 2 AND 3 Map of View Area 2 AND 3 Photosimulations 2 AND 3 This requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services Section 2. Public Works Plan Review Section 3. Building Section 4. Development Planning Section NiPLANNING DEV~~tt,~ RENiON OC11 G 100~ RECE\~EO Q:\WEB\PW\DEVSERV\Forms\Planning\waiver.xls PROJECT NAME: --L.8_'q..=.:......o.'t-:::;...·.:I,61_&-______ _ DATE: _--'-~....;.....,()~V/_~----r--:./ {)~~-,--, __ r 7 01/0612004 LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL A: Beginning at a point on the easterly line of the Northern Pacific Railroad right-of-way which point is west 169.5 feet and north 283.5 feet from the northwest corner of lot 1, block 24, town of Renton, according to the plat thereof, recorded in volume 1 of plats, page 135, in King County, Washington; thence running northerly along said easterly right-of-way line 216.5 feet; thence at right angles, easterly 109.5 feet to a point in the westerly line of Burnett Street, extended; thence southerly along said westerly line of Burnett Street extended 216.5 feet; thence westerly 109.5 feet to the pOint of beginning, all of which lies between the right of way of the Northern Pacific Railroad and the westerly line of Burnett Street extended and is part of the original Henry H. Tobin donation land claim no. 37, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, Willamette Meridian, in King County, Washington. PARCEL B: The north 62 feet of the following described property: That protion of the Hen ry H . Tobin donation land claim no. 37, being parts of sections 17, 18 and 20 in Township 23 North, Range 5 East, Willamette Meridian, in King County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning at a point 60 feet west of the northwest corner of Block 24, town of Renton, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 1 of plats, page 135 in King County, Washington; thence south 16.5 feet; thence west 109.5 feet to the Northern Pacific Railway right-of-way; thence north along the east line of said right-of-way line 300 feet; thence east 109.5 feet; thence'south 283.5 feet to the true point of beginning. That portion of the donation land claim of Diana B. Smithers, family of Diana B, Tobin, a widow, and the heirs at law of Henry H. Tobin, deceased, designated as claim no. 37 located in parts of sections 17,18 and 20 in Township 23 North, Range 5 East, Willamette Meridian, in King County, Washington, defined as follows: Beginning at a point 60 feet west of the northwest corner of Block 24 of the town of Renton, according to the plat thereof, recorded in volume 1 of plats, page 135, in King County, Washington; thence south 16.5 feet; thence west 109.5 feet to the Norhtern Pacific Railroad right-of-way; thence north along the east line of said right of way 300 feet; thence east 109.5 feet; thence south 283.5 feet to the point of beginning; except the north 62 feet thereof. DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON OCT 262004 RECEIVED AO.1 Project Information I DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION DFvF'~ANY~~ONMENTAL CHECKLIST (;11 Y Of RENTON City of Renton Development Services Division OCT 2 6 2004 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 pti~~gHECKLlST: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21 C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. R:IPW\DEVSERVlFormsIPlanninglenvchlst.doc09/24/03 A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Pa,.kSide a.t Cf8 Bu,.n~tt 2. Name of applicant: Perr-ksTde.. ~+-Gf,S Burne-it-~ L.C-. 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: AfPh~4Mt: ~t; .3,.,'" PI.t'e. It.~ Sftlt1tl" WA ers 1I:t 2-D"-.3,2..2.-/.381 CIMf",t: KeMt Sw..vt"y J r$A .Ar''''~~.IP''c. $() II"*' A~. S'~'J 5u.-Ie ~'J e~I'tv~ ,8tXJf 4. Date checklist prepared: +.15-~'-fJ.18 oet~~ ,)"?~ 5. Agency requesting checklist: C '''7 ~ ~f'trf.t>t\ (Jlf"ntfl,/8u;'d;n"JPu~liC, W.,.kSl 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): B~,(\ e'J.f. V«f.I"tl .r.,,. ~t\J.d-l~~ -Apt" ~()().5 Pr,;tct ~M"~"'I"f\. -')uly .2f)()(i 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. tJ.,.e, 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. 'ft\vlr."Mt"t..I ASS.eiAte~ r~p.r+ JAhJ :./JD/~()tJ() 6~"'f'eh. C4'Jrt$ul·h.fl+~ rep.,.r 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. Nelle, 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Sik pl,t\ r<evitw AfI""VA' euilJ'Mt PerM ib 11. Give briErt'; complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. lot; Uf\ii-ApCU··+Mf>I\+ bfllfJI'J wl-u.. ~SSt'dct~J pt,..k/tl-' ~"fI""//lff With,,, fWD lfvt l~ t>f 5frCle-fv~ will -r~ 'tvt', ~ ~~,fIYlPtlf, ~,,,e,4"tU tJL row ~ ~~ouse. +ype, cJtlN3 i/\ .nonf-t>{! tke, IMrk'-, 6-1-r.,d,....,. ,- R:\Pw\DEVSERv\Forms\Planning\envchlsl.doc 2 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. ~ff, dl#«e~ttd I~l d~erlpJ-t't\ site fA.ff\ Vldtt;1-y tf\lIp 4If,..J +tJpIJtlP4/J.l" i n~'t M" ~ It'W\ $fI'''~'I''t;J tiS flit -J.J Sik pIt/it J'i#v'fw AIP'lntIt~1l B. ~N~IR'ONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one(5Yrolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other . b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) Less f",t\ J% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. ~~ .,dt,~ti 6tpc>tf'~ni,~1 R.",rt SJ,M,#'J tI~ ".rt-t).p S iie. PI,,, ~f'" ~tAr Appl,r,d."". ~ d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. e. f. g. h. NtJ Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. 4i S'tJ (;1 ~ ~"fp,f«l wIll t\ptl frJ"~ t.,."rJ.,p' -fr()W\- tke.. -t.'l-t"«v ... fIDI'\ f'Dr -thIs P(Cjt£t-; Could erosion occur as a res~lt of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. A"y erf)~i"l\ is I\Dt likt'15ittte #.e sj~ ;5 ~Ik. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Ntllf/y I~ of tJ-e.-SIn.. will he. r()vP,'£'wifh ;Mptr-V"'" .sf/ttl« (#$. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: AI", AppI'~4t)~ R:IPw\OEVSERVlFormsIPlanninglenvchlsl.doc 3 2. AIR 3. a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors,industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. "tJrJllj c"t\~hve""~t1-Ot15+ .~J. eMi~)D'" ..prDM C"~$""'veh~1\ elJ"'1rmeA: A.p~,.c.t\Stnlc.~r'lf\ -Aufl,M"I,iJ~ eM/S1i,,,,.p,'tt\ rp"J~"" Vt",er~. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. tJ,/le, c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: . ~in+4it\ «II pf)W~r-~Ij) edVlptYt(,flt cst tid eD"sf-rtlef',1f\ Mlekillety I" ~ W,(J.!;"4 t>rJ~('. WATER J a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. NDfI~ 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. AI,,) ,",e. ~,.. ~I v~,.. .5 4I>\J~'" 1.«/ tr; fAt-H"M t!)~ -liiJ plf))~et. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Pf)(lf!, 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. YtJne, 5) Does the proposal lie within a 1 DO-year flood plain? If so, note location on the site plan. NfJ 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. NIne, R:IPw\OEVSERVlFormsIPlanninglenvchlsl.doc 4 b. Ground Water: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. 2) c. 1) 2) d. /J(J Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals ... ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. N."e" Water Runoff (including storm water): Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters, If so, describe. All rD~ dr4til'S tf.J f"4IIbvJ,,,/n5 will j,e. tl-le .. 11f\~ ;"ltJ 'fk, Rt"t\~t\ 6.J..'M Wed-,,. S ymrra. Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. AJ~J WA~'" N-f.-~fJ",'$;" «;I .. I-el-W,~ al~~J tlSJ 0/ ytI'-hAV~~/tltt:$ will ,~#,..,,A #1(\ 1)111 w,.#",.. ~r".1.,,., ~~(f, 1",,, JlseJ'f~ fr; ~I«M "y~~It1. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: See rf''''(t~ ~ ;frtrll e-I «b,v-e.. 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: __ deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other .~ evergreen tree: fir, cedar, ~ other shrubs __ grass __ pasture __ crop or grain __ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other __ water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other __ other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? .:5ee..a.r~"ist rtf~,.t 4#ldt~ 4$ Co ptlr-l-tt $;~e pllYi rtv,'pw appl,'tttf;()yt.,. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. • N()"~ d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance 5e;g;:;;';:~~li~eJ~ pl,tl $~m/lt~J tJf$ p~,.r~ sik PJIt'v r--e V i t IAI'"'" iJf. Df) '/1 Cei flD fl. 5 R:\Pw\DEVSERv\Forms\Planning\erlVlhls .doc 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: hawk, heron, eagle~other _______ _ Mammals: deer, bear, elk, Deaver, other _________ _ Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other _____ _ b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. NtJllt!; c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain N() d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: N'ir "ffhu.W~ 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Eleeh,'~ -h~4fttl·~.I~I", CltftJ h,hTJ" b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. N~ c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: . T'r()jeJ-wJIl b~ J~;I\,.J to If\f-tt 4It II W"$~/,~", ft\~JY t'ede-r,c.1rt ... Mb 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Fire 4J. R~~ue. 5etvvt~J W""1 be r~wffJ. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: N.t 'WI ie .. hl& R:\Pw\OEVSERv\Forms\Planning\envchlst,doc 6 b. 1 ) 2) 3) Noise What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? 6tel\~""" .. cffDfW'ebile. t""r"W',e. 1'\1J;..$e,.~ t>t'u~/_III ... 1 a;rfJ~,,~ -F Iy ~~r not,e. What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. I . I $h.,r tf'fM :(,.tr\t,J ~trtle-ftM ~vl";~ lit tid Q55t'el .. tf'4 ,."iSf!,. Lt)~ nrM I Ir~~ in .,,,.1 6Clt t).p Pl'Djf'ef: Proposed measures to re,Quce or control noise impacts, if any: I I s~ort mM ~ Pe,.+'tJtM eo"~tr"ef;",, Jelri" nfJl"r-M tPlJ,.kl, """IS 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. b. c. d. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? _ ... 1.6 -n-tt~ )$ e.urr~C'tly ft' tJje. ~'" i~e S;+e, it ;, tld~~"t. ry""t'Pll tlPle; wtre. ""e tf-nd t1AJtJ sf-lJfylMlte_ 4IItld r~f.-il btlil ;~j. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Thtre 1P.$ pr,"" ""t ".. JMine'1 t'ln t1e SM~ ewJ D.p. t~e-,j~. Describe any structures on the site. ~'ff, dIe.-W\. )tJ'1~r 4""1 sh~.Ju,.,,, D,. n.e $ilt-Prevrlo,,~y 'tkre. wt.r-e 4Me..II~l t.,.,fJ.st-.t 1 w.reh",Je .J.. "-nd b,,'I~''11 ~ sik. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? NI) Pre\l'DC6 bv"~'~J fJ" ~Jle ~ve, rtt''fi'-Hy bf'ft\ dftN111,heJ e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? CD g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Uot appliCAble., h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. HI i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? A"rtJ'1-'rtY-~f',/ IhO r~re will f"~fJe in t~e (()rt\pJe~£ proj(ler. R:\Pw\DEVSERv\Forms\Planning\envchlst.doc 7 9. 10. 11. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? P,ne/ k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: ih~ ptt>ittet WiIJ be-~r~ ~t ~e.-(;.i"-t of Rfrih,t\ p/~"Ni bllll~;'h~~"(.. w.tks tf;'rtMttlT lAJ~it:" will ~tt,~,e t'IJMpJI,,,,., wi-&" HOUSING IN4t1 C!JtMJ ~~-.te r~"f"Wttt1J/, a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low,..income housing. 10(0 M.rkt.r rAk ~~(J.si, (JIl'+" die, ,rf)~ -f'.,r t~e $ik-: b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. #One, c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Pff ArpJ'tlllbJe, AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. ' ~e ~f"~ f'tJtflPII ~ ike. bvltJl!1 is «. "(I~fI5e. wi»" A ~tI,,,~ tJPfi;8l-a" (.p,,'or ~'I4I'S art. fr> M.t'MJer6t 'J. ~I$#tlty ",f-tk, "'se.;J ~ ~ptM' s,J,,~ b 6ii~;h{k.~~~tttJ;:::'ZW*:sbe ;;:lt3U';;+"~ ~ .t b",'JltI;;~ ... k- i-M ..... rrjt~1l m ~#.~wt ~ttfI., to ti-ff'l 6 I!'~~'S PI.J £'.}fPeT ~ill c."''''' ~oridrecfnfefsures to red~tl o~~fOI~r~tic ,mpactl'ifaH?""· Jt~ ~,..,;rf-J .1. ~e. «(pkt'tn+ ~~5 J,te" )1' a>tl~a-w,~ He til-, ~ ~ff\""1\ #".,J, .. -I-~ a'G~ PrtJ"" ""I will etJtt+t,.~ ~ wotk wl+~ tiL ,flit t}trf"l~,J: jl.e,." LIGHT AND GLARE .5i+e. '11" tl~>II'MI p,.,tn, ttJ il\StJrtl #e tlf;,.)',IW'I~~ ;,.p. er IV af5~e-H~/1y pltUl~ pt"OjPtJt, a. What type of light or glare w~1 tne proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly 1r~?f~K el~4l~f)n &VHf be flY."$~~ 10 ~Otftl' S"f\ It~J fie, UkM' elf\Alt""I'~ -It the,. ttPt(rn"t\ 51lfJ. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? )I,) -Me ~fl'''' J"SS w; II be no" -r'P~JIfe., if' (\~("'" ~,i k ,"}rf'flt'" DV".k,,.,J will frt~,trt $""' -P,'M Jirt-cH, kf"'·/, rn"t~ _t-~ J'.,1. R:\PW\DEVSERV\Forms\Planning\envchlst.doc 8 c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? #011& tAle,.. #. t\ tJjdftt1r .s+r~ I,,).f, d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: efiprflr ruhr ,.I~ .,viii be ~rth -Io~" 12. RECREATION c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation 1k~o;:.;;es~'i b;v:t~:J;lt~,~~n:;;:;n:'p!'t\ 5p'~ N'/""J. 1>1 ~ Cil,. 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. Jh b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. ~ &. A-r~eJ'f(J ~rl--tN,t tA~t'tJWlPl"'tt5 ~e. S'rle. ('l,n ~"1t'1AI"'" 5vhMi-H-4). c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: S~e.-& ctrehte.,r,ltkl re.,.tf-' tlwtt ae~fJmfM"'" ii~ Silt. Pili' ft~lAtw- svlt"" tf-A \ . 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to p,;e ;k:i:ti:!:t;j,~~~ 0:;. PjlaJ i~lt ,),11 -n.t .MlrnfJI"'" t~t. Silt. p).", ~";tv jCl~~I"ft ... b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? 'les, tk (\tlr"f-~ ls lilt the ~t'f\f-ett -rr4~jl--etf\""'" ~r\ f1vr~7t /Jr "e, y\llf/ ~~(>'f\ 2,,1 4"1.. 3rt! : s}rttf; c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? 1~ we re..-~frD""" ~ ... .J.e'Y. ~() p~rkl "1. Sf-res tAll~il\ iit--prttlltJlIS d-tvd"rt\tf\t tJi\ ~ts .sHe.. i}.e, prtfDse1l P~td-wlU Jw,~ efPPlfJ'/JfnAhly R:\PVv\DEVSER~~!rJ'~~~~~vce,l~. 9 15. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private? Tkpr~f~t~ pro)t""twll1-rp6C1,'re #e e~oJe cf BVfAe-H-A"h''''''s.vtJv tD I)e dM.lD~ witk ~rhJ "lft"ffj ~it.leWA-'''S drJ. ~,!t~, e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. p, f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. See fke.. rr~'''' 5fvly 6J,FW\th( tl$ ... ~'"t.,.p #e, :5i+e-P/IF\ R~"tW- tWIr (cd10" . g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: ~ t"e.. tr~ Oiwly $~t'J ~, a. JMrT t'-f! .ne, SHe P/nl ~f"ie.w-4Ilffll~"I\. PUBU't! SERVICES ( a. b. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, he~lth re, schools, other)? If so, generally describl1 ,hele. will be tU\ i"cre.r ne,A.tir-""C(.), ", .. Hh are, 4116 ~~, ~v.~. 61"f~_ ~ ,.,. ,ll.,.., I'IM.. .rire.<J., .... ,rfVl.fISI'I "" ~ .M., f\ttAI errv.l. ",.. .., In5 I f to rt'J tAte+l~ ~r~. ~ropos d measwes to r=e or control direct i;rpacts ~ public services, if any. JJ~,,(l; (J~ 16. UTILITIES a. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. IJ -rfe, f~1t Prt)lH-J-will ~kt liSt. eP elf'etrlti'7J fJl4t""'" sp~rJ ~~,~e.~ ~1I$e. ,ntvife. All «J+i'r~lfS 4(te. ~tkS4r~, C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: Name Printed: Date: R:\PW\OEVSERV\Forms\Planning\envchlst.doc 10 D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEETS FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, flood plains, or prime farmlands? Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: R:IPWlDEVSERVlFormsIPlanning\envchlst.doc 11 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full di 0 ur on my part. Proponent: Date: ENVCHLST.DOC REVISED 6/98 J<erd-5MVt"tJ T.$A .ArrdvT.-.cbJ ,II&-' lolla/()t # I R:\Pw\OEVSERv\Forms\Planning\envchlsl.doc 12 DRK DEVELOPMENT INC 3620 100th St SW #B • Lakewood WA 98499-4422 Phone 253-584-0192 • Fax 253-584-0467 NT PLANNING DEV~~~~ RENTON oel 2 6 2{}{}~ RECE,veo October 13, 2004 To: City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton W A 98055 Phone 425-430-7200 Fax 425-430-7231 From: Reed Kelley Re: 95 Burnett Project Submittal Requirements -Site Plan Review Construction Mitigation Description The construction activities for this project are scheduled to begin April 1, 2005. The construction activities are scheduled to be completed 15 months later on or about July 1, 2006. The daily operations will be conducted from 7:00 AM to 6:00 PM Monday thru Friday. It is anticipated that some construction activities will be required on Saturdays. The exact number of Saturdays and duration is currently unknown, but in no event would the work begin before 8:00 AM and finish after 4:30 PM. Attached to this memo are proposed hauling and transportation routes. One is from a Ravensdale pit and one is from a Sumner pit. These routes may change if we are confronted with unknown street closures. We plan to implement the following measures to minimize dust, wind, erosion, traffic impacts, and noise. 1. Water trucks will be used on an as-needed basis to control our site dust. 2. The project will organize proper signage, cones, and flaggers as needed for deliveries to the site. 3. Install and maintain all city required erosion control and street debris regulations 4. All equipment used will be late model equipment that is outfitted with noise reduction accessones. r' 'WISII~? Maps & Di.ctions Start: 32500 5E Kent Kangley Rd, Rave_Ie, WA 98051 f!n«ll: 95 Burnett Ave 5, Renton, y.tA 98055 Total Distance: 19.9 Miles EstImated Total nme: 33 minutes • Proposed Hauling Route" A" -Ravensdale Pit Directions Miles Map Start: Depart 32500 SE Kent Kangley Rd, Ravensdale, WA 98051 5.2 on SE Kent-Kangley Rd (West) 1: Road name changes to SE Kent Kangley Rd 0.2 2: Turn RIGHT (North) onto SR-169 [Maple Valley Black Diamond 13.8 Rd SE] 3: Keep STRAIGHT onto SR-900 [Bronson Way N] 0.3 4: Bear LEFT (South) onto SR-900 [Mill Ave S] 0.1 5: Turn RIGHT (West) onto SR-900 [S 2nd St] 0.2 6: Turn RIGHT (North) onto Burnett Ave S 0.1 lEnd: Arrive 95 Burnett Ave S, Renton, WA 98055 t.:li~~ ~ U ~~ \ I. ~\ J'" .~ ~N t I I QI <.n ~." ril i ~~j~f ;' ®2003 MiclOsoltcolp 02003 tm'I'eJ. ~dfO{~ Your right to use maps and routes generated on the MSN service Is sublect at all times to the MSN Terms of Use. Data gedits. copyright and dlsctalmer. '·nISII~d Maps' & Dirpctions Start: 2813 E Valley Hwy E, Sumner, W. ,390 IEndl: 95 Burnett Ave 5, Renton, WA 98055 Total Distance: 19.9 Miles • Proposed Hauling Route "B" -Sumner Pit Estimated Total Time: 25 minutes Directions Miles Map Start: Depart 2813 E Valley Hwy E, Sumner, WA 98390 on E 1.3 Valley Hwy E (North) 1: Turn LEFT (West) onto 8th St E 0.8 2: Keep STRAIGHT onto 8th St (E) [Stewart Rd SE] 0.2 3: Keep STRAIGHT onto 8th St (E) [Stewart Rd SW] 0.3 4: Take Ramp (RIGHT) onto SR-167 towards WA-167 I Auburn I 15.9 Seattle 5: Keep STRAIGHT onto Rainier Ave S 0.7 6: Turn RIGHT (East) onto SR-900 [S 3rd St] 0.4 7: Turn LEFT (North) onto Burnett Ave S 0.2 lend: Arrive 95 Burnett Ave S, Renton, WA 98055 - ~ lRe",on,;~ +. .. 1 s :robin-St-!l ~~ :~ 1,/ ~ ~ s-:2nrStr=-' 900) .S,,-2nd'St"',,: ';"0 f®2003 MiClOSoItCOIP.~03 LJk.Ud~OrG~!. Your rtaht to use maps and routes generated on the MSN service is subject at all times to the MSN Terms of Use. Data creditS. copyright. and dlsdaimer. . ' .... • Preliminary Traffic Control Plan o Traffic control signs • WORKAHEAD • FLAGGER AHEAD • ROAD CONSTRUCTION AHEAD • ONE LANE ROAD o All work in road right-of-way will be manned by certified traffic personnel with state approved signage. · ... Arboricultural Consulting P.O. Box 135 MOUNTlAKE TERRACE, WJ.. October 18, 2004 J43-0135 PHONE:(4Z5)n6-0850, MDBllE:(Z06)755-Z<. DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON Dave Neilsen OCT 2 6 2004 -Colpitts Development Company, LLC 2256 38th Place East RECIEIVIED Seattle, WA 98112 RE: Tree Condition Evaluation and Impact Assessment Report Parks ide at Burnett 95 Dave: This report is provided to you as a means of addressing the conditions of the trees adjacent to the site of the proposed development referred to as Parkside at Burnett 95 in the city of Renton, WA. Please see the accompanying Tree Evaluation and Impact Map for reference to this report. All of the trees were originally evaluated in 2001 with recommendations made for retention and removal. With regards to some of the trees recommended to be removed, I found no real concerns warranting their rempval provided the impacts to them can be minimized. The recommendations to minimize the impacts and provide for the retention of these-trees are presented in this report. I visited the site on I. Site Conditions The project site is currently undeveloped but cleared of all significant vegetation. In general it is denuded. The site is surrounded by developed land and immediately borders a narrow park site to the west. The trees of concern that are addressed in this report are located within this park area and are along the eastern boundary of the park, immediately adjacent to the project site serving as a screen. Because these trees are located within a public park, the affects of the proposed development upon them is a concern. The conditions of the park site are open and well maintained. Although I didn't note any sprinkler heads or other irrigation systems, given the condition of the turf and plantings, it appears as though the site is irrigated. This supplementalirrigation directly benefits the trees of concern and will continue to do so in the future. II. Tree Conditions The trees within the park adjacent to the project site range in size from 8 to 22 inches in diameter, approximately 20 to 30 feet in height with crown spreads ranging from approximately 10 to 30 feet. Originally, 29 trees were specified to be evaluated, however, 7 of them had been removed sometime between the 2001 evaluation and my site visit. The species of trees evaluated include the following: Tree Condition Evaluation and Impact Assessment Report Parkside at Burnett 95 -Colpitts Devalopment Company. LLC October 18, 2004 1 Arboricultural Consulting (' _.' .... • Leyland cypress (x Cupressocyparis leyland;,) • Austrian pine (Pinus nigra) . • Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menzies;') The evaluated trees are numbered on the accompanying map as #s 3, 4,5, 6, 7, 8,9, 10,11,12,13,14,15,16, .20,21,22,23,26,27,28 and 29. All are at least 3 feet from the property line, however, the driplines of many of the trees pass well beyond the property line. All of these trees are'rather small and therefore considered immature. All appear to be in very good condition, and because they are so young it is assumed that they have a high level of vigor. I saw no conditions or symptoms indicating otherwise. III. Proposed Development Impacts and Concerns At present, the only portion of the project proposed for development is that in the southern two-thirds of the site adjacent to trees #11 through #29, however, it must be assumed that similar development will be proposed for the northern third of the project site. The proposed development immediately adjacent to the trees is a parking garage. According to the project architect, the building will be approximately 2'6" east of the property line. The proposed grading and excavation will reduce the grade by 1 '8" between the property line and the building, at which point a 3 foot cut will be made, for the foundation. Because the trees are so small, the height of the building will be greater than that of most of the trees. Based upon the proposed development actions, following are the impacts most likely to result: 1. Root damage and loss -The proposed grading and excavation will likely result in a moderate amount of root damage and loss, particularly to the trees nearest to the property line. In my opinion, feeder roots will constitute the greatest percentage of those lost, and very few anchoring roots should be affeCted therefore the stability of the trees should not be reduced. The loss of feeder roots can affect a tree's ability to gather the necessary resources such as air, water and nutrients. In my opinion, however, these trees are young enough and vigorous enough to recover from the impacts and continue to thrive. 2. Light environment changes -Introduction of the building will greatly alter the light environment, removing all light from the east. At present, these trees are well exposed to the entire southern horizon allowing them to make use of light throughout the entire day. After the building is constructed, the trees will only receive light in the afternoon hours. While this will be a significant change, like the root loss, in my opinion, these trees are young enough and vigorous enough to recover from this environmental change and continue to thrive. Tree Condition Evaluation and Impact Assessment Report Parlcside at Burnett 95 -Colpitts Development Company, LLC October 18, 2004 2 Arboricultural Consulting 3. Crown Reduction -Perhaps the greatest conflict affecting the retention of the trees is that associated with the need for significant crown reduction on the building side of most of the trees. Because the crowns of these trees are so low and the western wall of the building is so high and so close, the crowns of many of the trees will have to be significantly pruned back. If some trees won't need to be pruned back prior to construction of the building, as they grow, even the crowns of these trees will need to be reduced. While the amount of branches needed to be removed will exceed the recommended amount of no more than 30% of total branch area at one time, in my opinion, the trees are young enough and vigorous enough to recover from the impacts and continue to thrive. Fortunately, evergreen coniferous species, such as the trees of concern, are not likely to develop branch~s in locations where branches are removed, particularly when light is not available in that location. Therefore, it is very unlikely that the trees will need be pruned regularly to maintain the clearance. IV. Discussion and Recommendations The trees of concern are in very good condition and appear to be young, very vigorous and thriving. Trees of this condition and age are much more capable of recovering from . development related impacts than those that are older and in poorer condition. In addition, these trees are located within a park site where the conditions are very conducive to proper health and development including regular irrigation and maintenance. . The proposed development will require Significantly reducing the spread of the crowns on the eastern sides of the trees if they are to be retained. While this will have an adverse affect upon the trees and result in at least temporarily elevated stress levels, because the trees are so young and vigorous,' in my opinion they are more than capable of recovering from the impacts and continuing to thrive on the site. While excavation and grading impacts will result in root damage and loss, in my opinion, the amount is not severe and, again, because the trees are so young and vigorous, the effects of the impacts are not likely to affect the health of the trees. I recommend that all of the trees are pruned prior to construction enough to provide clearance for the parking garage. It is unlikely that they will develop, regrowth in the location of the pruning, therefore if they are all pruned at once, there will not likely be any need for future pruning. In my opinion, it is possible to retain all of the trees along the eastern border of the park site, even if their crowns are so significantly reduced. If your intention and interest is to do so, it can ~e achieved and the screen they provide will remain. Removal of half of their crowns will alter the appearance of the trees and render them less aesthetically pleasing, however, once the building is complete, the reduced crown will hardly be noticeable from the park. Tree Condition Evaluation and Impact Assessment Report Parkside at Bumett 95 -Colpitts Development Company, LLC October 18, 2004 3 Arboricultural Consulting While there the possibility that the trees will not recover from the development related impacts and die in the near future, the effort of retaining the tree is still worthwhile in my opinion. If the trees were iarger and the root impacts more severe, the trees could pose significant hazards. However, given the sizes of the trees (that being rather small) and the minimal root impacts anticipated, the hazards potentials of these trees will not be , great enough to warrant concern and removal. v. Use of this Report This report is provided to Colpitts Development Company LLC as a means of addressing the conditions of the trees located along the eastern border of the park, immediately adjacent to the proposed Parkside at Burnett 95 development in the city of Renton, wA. It is my opinion that the trees are young and vigorous enough to recover from the development related impacts and to continue to thrive. However, in order to retain them, they will be subjected to considerable damage both above and below ground. While the trees appear healthy and vigorous enough to recover and survive, Arboricultural Consulting cannot make such a guarantee. This report is based largely on readily observable conditions and, to a lesser extent, on readily ascertainable conditions. This report does not guarantee against the failure of these trees. No attempt has been made to determine hidden or concealed conditions. Reports may be adversely affected due to the physical condition of the site and the difficulty of access that may lead to observation or evaluation difficulties. The work for this report has conformed to the standard of care employed by ISA Certified Arborists. No other representation or warranty is made concerning the work or this report and any implied representation or warranty is disclaimed. Finally, this report is only intended to provide opinions and make recommendations and cannot guarantee against damage to the trees, damage to property or injury of the tree workers occurring during work on the trees. Cordially, ~ ~~ \0 . Tony Shoffner Consulting Arborist, Horticulturist ISA Certified Arborist #PN-0909 Tree Condition Evaluation and Impact Assessment Report Parkside at Burnett 95 -Colpitts Development Company, LLC October 18, 2004 4 Arboricultural Consulting 50 116'h Avenue S.E. Suite 201 Bellevue, WA 98004 T 425.401.6828 F 425.401.1J630 October 18,2004 T S A I arc h ; tee t 5, p.I.I.e. DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON OCT 2 6 2004 City of Renton Development Services DivisiBfCeiVED 1055 South Grady Way Renton, W A 98055 Re: Site Plan Review Project Narrative for the Parkside at 95 Burnett Project PROJECT LOCATION / EXISTING CONDITIONS The project site is bounded by Burnett A venue South on the East, by an existing structure to the South, by Burnett Place South to the West and by a multi-unit retirement residence to the North, The site is in downtown Renton in the Center Downtown zone (CD). The site is approximately 36,347sf. Currendy there are currendy no structures or trees on the site except along the West property line. Previously there were one and three story warehouse and retail buildings. An arborist report that describes the trees that will not survive the construction of this project has been prepared as part of the Site Plan Review submittal. Also, the soils on the site have been analyzed and separate geotechnical, and archaeological studies accompany this Site Plan Review Submittal. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT A six level apartment project with associated structured parking is proposed for the site. The building will contain a total of 106 residential units. Ten of these will be townhouse type units along Burnett South. The remaining 96 units will be contained in a four story wood structure built over a PT slab and stepped back from the townhouse units below. On the park side of the building only five of the six levels are completely above grade as the lowest level on the park side is parking and qualifies as a basement. The density of the proposed project will be 127 dwelling units per acre. The maximum outright density allowed in the CD zone is 100 dwelling units per acre. Therefore administrative conditional approval will be required to develop the property to the proposed density. 200202_corrcsp_consulcjuris_200327 _Corr_ConsultJuris_ProjectNarrative.doc Prior to demolition there were several buildings on the project site. The buildings totaled 34,495sf and ranged in height from one to three stores. The new development will not obstruct views beyond what the previous development did. PARKING It is proposed that traffic to the two level parking garage will enter at two points off Burnett A venue South. The upper level of parking will be accessed at the South end of the site and a basement level of parking will be accessed at the North end of the site. The structured parking is located behind the townhouse units that front on Burnett A venue South. Residential parking in the CD zone is to be provided at 1 space per dwelling unit. There are 106 units in the proposed project therefore 106 parking spaces are required. 135 parking spaces are provided directly off the drive aisle along with 46 tandem spaces which do not count towards the parking requirements. Because we are 29 stalls over the parking requirement we request a parking modification for this project. The marketplace dictates that parking be provided at a ratio greater than the one stall per dwelling unit requirement. The. additional parking proposed will not adversely affect the appearance of the project because it is all contained within the building structure. RESIDENTIAL The street level will contain 10 townhouse type units which total approximately 9424sf. These units will be separated horizontally from the main four story tower of units by a 3 hour rated post tensioned slab. The four levels above will contain 24 units on each floor. Units will vary in size from a 485sf Studio to a 3 bedroom, 2 bathroom unit with 1142sf. The main lobby for the apartment building will be located off Burnett Avenue South between the townhouse type units. STATISTICS Total lot coverage at grade: Total area of parking Total area of residential Estimated Construction Cost Estimated Fair Market Value 95% 4.5,021sf 102,409sf $8,600,000.00 $13,700,000.00 200202_ corresi' _ consultjuris_200327 _ Corr_ Consul C) uris _ ProiectN arrative.doc STATISTICS CONTINUED Estimated Quantity of Excavation Height of building at main roof Height of building at highest roof IBC Construction Type-Levels 1&2 IBC Construction Type-Levels 3-6 Sincerel~ ~~-lll-c---"'l"---- Kent Smutny, Manager 4,560cy 58' -6" 68' -8" Type I-A Type V-A 200Z:)2_ corresp _ cor.sul (juris _200327 _ Corr_ Consult_' uris _ ProjectN arra~ve. doc ~'~ ... -\, ,', I OCT 262004 RECEIVED T S A I arc Iz it e c t s, p.l.l.e. October 18, 2004 City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Re: Conditional Use Permit Justification for the Parkside at 95 Burnett Project 50 116rh Avenue S.E. Suite 20! Bellevue, WA 98004 T 425.401.6828 F 425.401.0630 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The site for this apartment project is in downtown Renton in the Center Downtown zone (CD). The site is approximately 36,347sf. The location of this project is an area that is earmarked for residential development of up to 100 dwelling units per acre outright and can be developed up to a density of 150 dwelling units per acre with administrative conditional approval. The proposed project would provide housing at 127 dwelling units per acre which is well within the maximum density that the City is willing to consider with administrative conditional approval. The location of the project is ideal for allowing higher development because of its proximity to the Renton Transit Center one block away. COMMUNITY NEED This project will help add to the creation of a critical mass of residents in downtown Renton which is important for the continued growth of the downtown core. A densely populated core is critical to the development of new business downtown which will in turn help to further the rejuvenation of the downtown core that began with moving out of the car dealerships from downtown to make room for dense residential development. EFFECT ON ADJACENT PROPERTIES The proposed development of a residential project at a density of 127 dwelling units per acre will complement the recent surrounding development in the downtown core and other proposed projects in the area. The City would like to see the McClendon's Site on the other side of the street and just to the South of the proposed project be 200202_corresp_consultjuris_200327 _ Corr_ Consult-Juris_ ConditionalUse.doc developed as retail or mixed-use once the current hardware retailer relocates. Dense residential development in the area like the proposed project is important to making redevelopment of the McClendon's site feasible. Itects, pUc Kent Smutny, Manager 20()202_corrcsp_consultjuris_200327 _CorcConsult_Juris_ConditionaIUse.doc '. ~- ,'. T PLANNING OEVEdi~~gF\~\::Nl0N I T S A I arc hit e c t 5, p.l.l.c. 50 116,h Avenue S.E. Suite 201 Bellevue, WA 98004 T 425.401.6828 F 425.401.0630 OC11. S 2004 RECE\VE.O October 18, 2004 Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton, W A 98055 Re: Urban Center Design Overlay District Report for the Parkside at 95 Burnett Project The following is a summary of how the proposed design for this project addresses the Urban Center Design Overlay District Guidelines. A. BUILDING SITING AND DESIGN 1. Pedestrian Building Entries: This standard requires buildings to be orientated to the street with the primary building entrance prominendy located on the facade facing the street. The main entry to the proposed apartment building faces Burnett, the primary street that the prqject faces. The entry is marked with a canopy and unique, prominent architectural treatment to the elevation at that location. The entire form of the building at this location reinforces the entry architecture. 2. Transition to Surrounding Developmen~: Careful siting and design treatment is necessary to achieve a compatible transition where new buildings differ from surrounding development in terms of building height, bulk and scale. The proposed development holds the street edge unlike the previous buildings that existed on the site. The previous buildings had parking lots between them and the street edge. To the South of the site are underdeveloped single familY lots. To the North is multifamilY retirement housing similar in scale to the proposed prqject. The proposed building has a total of six levels, with a ma:x:imum height of 67 '-10 "to the top of the highest penthouse. This is much lower than the 95' height limit allowed for this site. In addition the apparent bulk of the project is reduced ~ stepping the building back above the townhouse sryle units which line the street edge. The levels above the townhouses are further modulated with recesses for decks. 2( 10327_ Cure Consult..J uris_DesignGuidlines.doc B. PARKING, ACCESS, CIRCULATION 1. Location of Parking: No parking shall be located between a building and the front property line or the street side yard of a corner lot. The proposed building is built nearlY to the properry lines on all sides therefore the parking is contained within the building structure. 2. Design of Surface Parking: NA 1. Structure/Garage Parking: Parking entries should not subordinate pedestrian entries and should not dominate the streetscape. Parking at grade shall be completely enclosed within the building or wholly screened. Parking garages should be architecturally compatible with the residential portion of the building. Garage parking should be secured. The street side of parking in the CD zone should incorporate retail or service commercial, facilities that can be used by the residents or units that have access from the street. There are two parking garage entries to the project, one Jor each level. The garage entries are located awqy Jrom the main pedestrian entry at the center oj the building. Thry are at the Jar North and South ends oj the building thus making them subordinate Jrom the primary pedestrian entry to the prqject. The residential parking is secured with garage doors. As this site is located outside oj the central downtown area North oj 2"d commercial space has not been incorporated into the proposed project. 2. Vehicular Access: Parking garages should be accessed from side streets. Driveways should be located to be visible from the right of way and not impede pedestrian circulation. Minimize the number of driveways and curb-cuts. Burnett Avenue South running in Jront oj the prqject site is the onlY location for vehicle acms. There is no secondary street adjacent to the site. The impact oj the parking garage entries has been minimized Iy placing them at the Jar North and South ends oJthe building. There is one curb cut for each ~r the two levels oj parking because the site dimensions constrain the ability to interconnect the two parking levels within the structure. 3. Pedestrian Circulation: Developments should include an integrated pedestrian circulation system that connects buildings, open space, and parking areas with the adjacent street sidewalk system. Pedestrian pathways should be delineated separate from vehicle circulation. The pedestrian entry to the building is directlY off Burnett Avenue. The required open space for the prqject is provided two levels up from street level and can also be accessed directlY from the sidewalk at Burnett AIJenue. C. LANDSCAPING / RECREATION / COMMON SPACE 1. Common Open Space Attached housing developments of 10 or more dwelling units shall provide· a minimum area of common open space or recreatio~ area equal to 50 square feet per unit. This pro/eet consists if 106 dwelling units, which would require 5 300if if open space. The proposed prqject provides a total if 6950if if open space. Areas provided include an exercise room, a (ammon gathering space available to all residents a common terrace at the third level ~lthe building and a pedeJtn'an connection on the North side if the building that links Burnett Avenue to the aqjacent park. The residential level courtyard has eastern exposure and is bordered Iy units on the west thus providing sU17Jeillance to the open space. D. BUILDING ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN 1. Building Character and Massing All building facades shall include modulation or articulation at intervals of no more than 40'. ' The proposed building utilizes a variety if modulation and articulation elements. At street level the building is set back from the front property line 6' to 8' in order to provide pn'vate outdoor space at the front if each townhouse unit. The 6' to 8' is further modulated with entry porches at each if the units. Textured eMU landscape walls will be used to separate the private outdoot:r space from the sidewalk at the street. Above street level the building is modulated such that there are no elevations longer than 40' on either the street or park sides. 200327_ Corr_ ConsulU uris_Desit,'11G uidlincs.doc 2. Building Rooflines Building rooflines should be varied by emphasizing dormers, chimneys, stepped roofs, gables, prominent cornice or fascia, or a broken or articulated roofline. A l)ariation rif rorif heights are used in the project to break down the scale rif the building and create the feeling that the prqject is a ciry block made up rif several different buildings. 3. Building Materials: Building exterior fInishes should be durable, of high quality, easily maintained and add visual interest and detail. The base of the building is complemented with durable materials including.a textured eMU landscape wall and other masonry materials aqjacent the main entry to the building. The upper portions rif the building use "lighter" appearing materials including bevel and panel siding. Sincerely, ;J.~ TSA Architects, pilc Kent Smutny, Manager 200327_ Corr_ Consult~' uris_DesignGuidlines.doc ... ,: ~ .'-,;. : ,:.', ~-, :;," :. ','0' . :'. ,'r", ,;' .. , :~. ~<~ ." . ' .. -... ~ " , .' .'. ' .... r': " 1/,' ..... , . :,,- ,t', " . < .... ~~.;' _,I, ',." ,\" ,', . ," ''. . '~ • .-.. r' ':,.. '"" ~ ),~ .. j :,.~ . J \ •• ,-, " " " \~ :.' . ,.,'., 'r . ~' ,:.,; r"' J." ,f;_ ,\'" .. ' ~.,.' . ~", ) ' .. • J, ".-" . . ~ , < . (:~" ,'. -.. I . -,;,,,_,, !~J;". " ~ . .' Jl '-.. ' .... -. " .~ .'~ .: ~ .' :',' .'). .... ~ . , .... ,,' " .. ,':.,', ~.~' :;-: .... "',1..' ~ "_, J " '. t' .', " ...... ' •• :.,:. ... } " :,..,!;"": ,s.. .' •. ~" ". 1,_, :( . ,.'". ::" ,~ ;' .-~.-~.' . • ,1\' '" .',. ," .~" . " ....... 'r-,r. c , .... ", ;,.' :, ~ .:-;' :' . , .•• ' '~.,' ~ ':'" '1.' . ', .• ' October5-200'4\'. ,-' ~ .,. "~~ . . " : ~ -.. '. ~.,~ ", ",' ~ -:,'( "1" '~ __ ' ,~ •. ~ , ~'. ,. " .: ',"",;. "'" ,,':; . ',1 ',' • 'I. ,,- ;~ .. \ ,; .. ; ", .'- Site Development Associates, LLC 10116 Main Street, Suite 106: Bothetl, Washington 98011 Preliminary Drainage Report Parkside at 95 Burnett Renton, Washington Prepared for TSA Architects Prepared By Site Development Associates, LLC 10116 Main Street, Suite 106 Bothell, WA 98011 425-486-6533 October 5, 2004 Table of Contents Introduction ........................................... : .................. 1 Existing Conditions ................................................. 1 Existing Onsite Drainage Basin ............................. 1 Developed Conditions .................................... 1 Proposed Drainage Plan ................................ 1 Detention and Water Quality ........................... 5 Downstream Analysis ..................................... 5 References ........... ~ .......................................... 5 Appendix A-TIR Worksheet List of Figures Figure 1. Vicinity Map .................................................................. 2 Figure 2. Existing Site ................................................................... 3 Figure 3. Proposed Site ................................................................ 4 INTRODUCTION. the Parkside at 95 Burnett project is a 70 unit apartment complex located at 95 Burnett Avenue South within the City of Renton, S17, T23N, R5E, W.M. in King County, Washington: The project is bordered by an existing apartment complex to the north, Burnett Avenue to the east, and the City of Renton Park and Logan Avenue to the wes~. Figure 1 is the vicinity map depicting the project location. The site is approximately 0.84 acres in size. The site previous was fully developed with various office buildings and associated paved parking areas. These structures have recently been removed ·from the site, and what remains is a level building pad some debris and vegetation. Figure 2 shows the existing site features. The proposed project will create a four story apartment building with two levels of enclosed parking, one level located slightly below grade, and one level slightly above the existing grade. Street improvements along the property frontage will be required and include, curb, gutter, sidewalk and a landscape strip. Two existing storm catch basins located in Burnett Avenue will need to be relocated as part of the improvements. The proposed site layout is shown on Figure 3. In addition to the roadways, the proposed project will include all utilities and other improvements necessary to accommodate the apartment complex. This report addresses the storm drainage issues associated with the development of the property, and construction of the frontage improvements. The design standards addressed for this report are contained in Renton Municipal Code Section 4-6-30. Section 4-6-30 specifies that the drainage design analysis shall conform to the standards set forth in the King County Surface Water Design Manual, 1990. EXISTING CONDITIONS Existing On-site Drainage Basin The existing site contained various structures which have been removed to leave a level building pad. The previous structures and surface features discharged undetained to the storm system in Burnett Avenue. DEVELOPED CONDITIONS Proposed Drainage Plan The proposed project will redevelop 0.84 acres of property into an apartment complex. The drainage system for the apartments will include roof downspouts and area drains for landscape areas. These drainage elements will connect to the existing storm system in Burnett Avenue describe above. - 1 - VICINITY MAP Scale: N/A Site Development Associates, LLC t-JO-b -No-. -I 131-001-04 Parkalde at 86 Burnett PREUMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT VICINITY MAP Figure _1_ W N s...... SE 4"7 N 4"7 E W Ai) g 0\ ~\ /0 s: fTl \ /0 I -< Z U /0 . /0 '-..-./ r--l N8829 '12 ''W ___ /09.50 I I 0) !"v I a a I I ~ a L --~N88'29'12"W 109.50' I I I I' I ~ (J) r---.J ::::l ~ (;) OJ I S; r-I ~ I ~ (;) I I Ci I ~ I ~ I ~ C) I ~ I '=:i """"" I -l ::< I ~ I~ I I I I I I I I I I I I L __ -, I I I I I I I I\,) ~ a a Scale: 1-=50' Site Development Associates, LLC i-Jo-b -No-. -i 131-Q01-D4 I..---I------CH I RIM=36.24 IE=34.89 8" CONG N II--+-s,z!ho"'=='=----CB I BRICK llL..L-'1-SSMH " 4S" RIM=36.46 RIM=36.11 IE=35.11 4" GAL IE=26.31 s" PVC N IE=26.46 8"7 S IE=26.36 8" PVC E LADDER W SSMH " 48" RIM=36.67 IE=27.69 8" PVC "'------.r=27.92 8" PVC '1f.+,HI---SSMH " 48" IE=31.67 DROP IE=27.87 8"7 W RIM=36.12 IE=15.92 16"+/-7 E IE=16.02 16"+-/ 7 W LADDER SW ~-SDMH " 48" CB I RIM=36.76 IE=30.33 8 CONG N IE=30.96 8" PVC E IE=30.31 8" CONC S IE=33.46 12" ADS W RIM=36.25 IE=34.25 12. ADS E A+-H--+CB 2' N\S X 0.8 E\W RIM=36.43 IE=35.63 6" CONC E rr--..-'---CB I BRICK RIM=36.84 IE=35.54 6" CONC W SDMH " BRICK RIM=37.24 IE=31.34 8" CONC S IE=31.39 8" CONC N IE=33.04 6" CONC E IE=33.04 6" CONC W IE=31.66 9" CMP SE SSCO RIM=37.31 --IE=35.79 10" CONG S--, -- -tJy COo? <Or 1 1 ~~~~~~~~~ Parkalde at 95 Burnett PREUMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT EXI8nNG 81TE Figure Z\' / .. -........ , q . , \ '"'"I III ~. ...., U) ~ II ~ -, ~ ~~E j::::: i' ~,,; I t) e-· (,. ~ •• ?l I <;) C'J 0 ~l Cj ~ 6i ?t \,j ~ t:j \ \ Site Development Associates, LLC Scale: 1-=50' Job No. 131-001-04 ,····-~C8 ! PJM",3G.2- !f>~34.89oj· (;OW: H ····CO·l ARICl< W/"',",.'36.11 :', 4" BSMH Ii '1.8" RlII&""36J)? '" 1E=.:U.6'.) g' PVC 11 , .. -·-·--·-"-~-lE:;:27.92 8R PVC S IE=,J Hi] DROP PV( . SSMH l! &.~}" It''''27.87 ~f? iN RIM,;;;3(t, ,2 ? C ? IV !E",,::,\L3:3 :) CONe N 11:>.30£5 B" PVC £ !E",;}O.3! B" CONe s GEl \ ![",3T46 12" ADS Vi R1M·",JO.25 IE·,,':14.2fi i;: ADS E -...:..-CB I 8i~!O< I R1M=30.84 .... I If""35.54 >,;" CONe w ":---. SDMB Ii BPiC}{ RjM=37.:';>~ 1£=3!.J4 1(",,31 39 ssco RlM=37.3' -~."" --~fE'7:;35.7S '1C~0 CONG 5.-.v_. _._ .. "w Parkalde at 95 Burnett PREUMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT PROPOSED SITE Rgure ~ Detention and Water Quality Detention and water quality are not proposed for this project. Detention is not proposed because the existing site was almost entirely impervious, and the proposed site will be very similar. In addition, the site is approximately 425 feet from the discharge point at the Cedar River, which is under the ~ mile threshold for detention. Water quality is not proposed because all parking area, which is the only pollution generating surface, will be fully enclosed and drainage will be collected by floor drains connecting to the sewer system in Burnett Avenue. Downstream Analysis The storm system that the proposed project will drain to runs north for 250 feet along Burnett, then turns and runs east for 125 feet along an access drive south of the Williams Condominium complex. At Williams Avenue, the storm system turns north and runs 50 feet where it is assumed that it daylights to the Cedar River. REFERENCES City of Renton Municipal Code, current through Ordinance 5020, passed September 29, 2003 . King County Surface Water Design Manual, 1990 -5- Appendix A-TIR Worksheet King County Department of Development and Environmental Services TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET Project Owner ' Pg,\,V\side. Q.i 15 Burne # ) L \..C Address 225" ,~8fu. 'PLgce ~9f>t Phone , ZO~ -322. -l3i I 0 Subdivison 0 Short Subdivision 0 Grading 'g Commercial 0 Other Community Drainage Basin 0 River 0 Stream 0 Critical Stream Reach 0 Depressions/Swales 0 Lake 0 Steep Slopes P~:\~,c;\eGe 0.+ fS SUfV)e.t+ Location Township 23 N Range S r: ..... ' ........ Section --'---=-17-"--__ --'- o DFW HPA o Shoreline Management o COE404 o Rockery o DOE Dam Safety o Structural Vaults o FEMA Floodplain 0 Other 0 COE Wetlands 0 Floodplain 0 Wetlands 0 Seeps/Springs 0 High Groundwater Table 0 Groundwater Recharge 0 Other N Erosion Potential Erosive Velcoties Soil Type Slopes U(b~tL \9" cl (Ut' 2_~o_' __ 0.=.-10_ Shent W/A D Additional Sheets Attached REFERENCE D Ch. 4 -Downstream Analysis D D D D D D Additional Sheets Attached MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS DURING CONSTRUCTION D Sedimentation Facilities ~ Stabilized Construction Entrance ~ Perimeter Runoff Control i1 Clearing and Graing Restrictions K Cover Practices ~ Construction Sequence D Other LIMITATION/SITE CONSTRAINT ~O 5!otW\" ckQ4nQ.~ \\ffi ,-t o!-vm5 da.m~A("eQ W'I 4 at-±be. S\1e fud.' l.\OulJ'" o.c..+ C6 a.. cOVIbtraifL'i: MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS AFTER CONSTRUCTION ~ Stabilize Exposed Surface ~ Remove and Restore Temporary ESC Facilities ~ Clean and Remove All Silt and Deb~is D Ensure Operation of Permanent Facilities D Flag Limits of SAO and open space preservation areas D Other o Grass Lined 0 Tank 0 Infiltration Channel 0 Vault 0 Depression M Pipe System 0 Energy Dissapator 0 Flow Dispersal Compensation/Mitigati on of Eliminated Site 0 Open Channel 0 Wetland 0 Waiver Storage 0 Dry Pond 0 Stream 0 Regional NIA 0 I Wet Pond Detention Brief Description of System Operation 'Relo ~{-e t..)C\Q"" nj cakh has\n<;,) \VlQ~U (uJ'b o.ocl· ~Lltte£ Facility Related Site Limitations Reference Facility Limitation 0 Cast in Place Vault 0 Drainage Easement 0 Retaining Wall 0 Access Easement 0 Rockery > 4' High 0 Native Growth Protection Easement 0 Structural on Steep Slope 0 Tract 0 Other 0 Other I or a civil engineer under my supervision my supervision have visited the site. Actual site conditions as observed were incorporated into this worksheet and the attachments. To the best of my knowledge the information provided here is accurate. (0 ." LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AGREEMENT DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON OCT 2 62004 RECEIVED , OF PARKSIDE AT 95-BURNETT, LLC Dated as of March 30, 2004 The limited liability company interests created by this Agreement have not been registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or under the state Blue Sky statutes in the various states where the interests may be offered, and may not be sold, transferred, pledged or hypothecated in the absence of an effective registration statement under said Act or the applicable state Blue Sky statutes or satisfactory assurance to the Company that such registration is not required. In addition, the sale or transfer of any interest in the Company must be made in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement. In view of these restrictions, the purchaser of any interest in the Company must be prepared to bear the economic risk of the investment for an indefinite period of time. -1-121 qpM 3/30/04 LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AGREEMENT OF PARKSIDE AT 9S-BURNETT, LLC THIS LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AGREEMENT (this "Agreement"), dated as of March 30, 2004, is made by and among Colpitts Development Company, LLC, a Washington limited liability company ("Colpitts"), HDH Associates, LLC, a Washington limited liability company ("HDH"), and Senseney Real Estate Holdings, LLC, a Washington limited liability company ("Senseney") (each, individually, a "Member," and, collectively, the "Members"). RECITALS WHEREAS, the Members have fonned a Washington limited liability company known as Parkside at 95-Bumett, LLC ("Parkside"); and WHEREAS, the Members desire that Parkside acquire, develop and own certain real property located at 95 Burnett Avenue, in the City of Renton, State of Washington, legally described in Exhibit D, as a multi-family residential housing project (the "Project"); and WHEREAS, the Members desire to contract with Colpitts, an experienced commercial real estate development company, as the Project's Development manager pursuant to the terms of a separate Development Services Agreement by and between Colpitts and Parkside. NOW, THEREFORE, the Members hereby agree as follows: I. DEFINITIONS Capitalized terms used in this Agreement, not separately defined herein, shall have the meanings assigned to such tenns in Exhibit A and such meanings shall be equally applicable to both the singular and plural forms of the tenus defined or to the feminine or masculine gender, as the case may be, unless the context othelWise requires. II. GENERAL PROVISIONS 2.1 Formation of Limited Liability Company The parties agree to form the Company as a limited liability company under the laws of the State of Washington, and the rights and liabilities of the Members shall be as provided in this Agreement, except to the extent that such provisions are not permitted by nonwaivable provisions of the Act. -1-12:19 PM 3/30104 5.5 Distributions Upon Liquidation If the distributions are to be made in connection with the dissolution and liquidation of the Company, the Liquidator shall cause such distributions to be made in accordance with Article XII. 5.6 Limitation on Distributions Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, no distribution to the Members shall be made if it would render the Company insolvent or would violate the applicable statutory restrictions upon making distributions to Members. VI. MANAGEMENT 6.1 Appointment of Manager T~ Company hereby appoints Colpitts to serve as its Manager. Colpitts as the .."" Manager shall be responsible for the Company's business and affairs including its day-to-day operations and shall be entitled to take for and on behalf of the Company all actions, with or without the approval of the other Members, except such actions as require the approval of the Members as set forth herein. 6.2 Authority of Manager 6.2.1 Authority of Manager Except as otherwise provided in Section 6.2.2 and in Article VII (identifying actions requiring M ember approval), the Manager shall be vested with complete management and control of the day-to-day affairs of the Company and have the power and authority to do all things necessary or proper to carry out the purpose of the Company. Without limiting the generality 0 f t he foregoing, and subject tot he restrictions noted above, the Manager shall ~ave full power and authority, at the expense of the Company and on its behalf: k (i) to cause the Company to acquire, remediate, develop, operate, man,!ge and otherwise deal with the Project; (ii) to conduct the day-to-day operations of all assets purchased, leased or otherwise acquired by the Company; (iii) to operate, develop, improve, maintain, finance, lease, acquire or otherwise deal with, the property of the Company as may be necessary, convenient or incidental to the accomplishment of the purposes of the Company; (iv) to execute, deliver and perform agreements, contracts, documents, undertakings, certificates and instruments necessary, convenient or -14-12: 19 PM 3/30/04 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the date first above written. MEMBERS AND MANAGER Colpitts Development Company, LLC, a .y -Washington limited liability company - By: HDH Associates, L.L.C., a Washington limited liability company By: Nam Title: Manager ________ _ Senseney Real Estate Holdings, L.L.c., a Washington limited liability company By: -43-1"1-10 DU l/'lntnlt • ~ • .iI •• (''''-1. \," .. ... ""'"~ . -. " ' . . . Ill"-' -. .-' . • • '. '> 4 • • .~. • • ,,-> . . • . . ~-". ''-/.'' . . ".\ ,,' . DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: June 24, 2004 CITY OF RENTON FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU MEMORANDUM Jason Jordan, Senior Planner Corey Thomas, Plans Review Inspector Preliminary Comments for 95 Burnett Avenue South Project 1. The preliminary fire flow required is 3,750 gpm. Four fire hydrants are required. One fire hydrant is required within 150-feet of the structure and the secondary hydrants are required within 300-feet of the structure. Any existing fire hydrants used to meet this requirement must meet current specifications including 5-inch storz fittings. 2. The fire mitigation fees are applicable at the rate of $388.00 per reside.ntial unit, $42,680.00 based on 110 units. This fee is paid at time of building permit issuance. 3. Separate plans and permits are required for the installation of the required fire sprinkler, fire alarm and standpipe systems. CT:ct ninefive t", PLANNING OEV1~{f~~~N;ENTON OC1 2 G 2004 RECE'VeO (. ...... ~. ,- TO: FROM: DATE: Jason Jordan Jan lilian June 28, 2004 CITY OF RENTON MEMO UTILITY PLAN REVIEW SUBJECT: PREAPPLICATON REVIEW COMMENTS 95 BURNETT AVE S. PREAPP NO. 04-076 95 -Burnett Ave S. NOTE ON PRELIMINARY REVIEW COMMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS REPORT: The following comments on development and permitting issues are based on the pre-application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or" concurrence by official decision makers (e.g. Hearing Examiner, Boards of Adjustment, Board of Public Works and City Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by the City or made by the applicant WATER 1. A Water System Development Charge (SOC) of $0.213 per square foot of gross site area will apply. This is payable at the time the utility permit is issued. A redevelopment credit will apply for existing water services at this site. 2. There is an 8-inch and 24-inch water main in Burnett Ave S. The sitie is in the 196 water pressure zone. The site is not within an Aquifer Protection Zone. Available pressure is approximately 70 psi. Available fire flow is 5,500 gpm 3. Preliminary fire flow is 3,750 gpm. All new construction must have fire hydrants capable of delivering a minimum of 1,000 gpm. Four hydrants will be required to serve this site. One hydrant is required within 150 feet from the building and three additional hydrants are required to be within 300 feet of the nearest corners of the building. Two existing hydrants on the 8-inch can be counted and 2 additional hydrants will be required to be installed on the 24 -inch water main in Burnett. 4. Existing hydrants counted as fire protection will be required to be retrofitted with a quick disconnect Stortz fitting if not already in place. 5. The proposed project is located in the 196 water pressure zone and is outside an Aquifer Protection Zone. 6. If applicant proposes a building, which exceeds 30 feet in height, a backflow device will be required on the domestic water meter. 95 Burnett Page 2 of 3 7. A fire sprinkler system is required by the fire department. A separate no-fee utility permit and separate plans will be required for the installation of the double detector check valve assembly for fire sprinkler line. All devices installed shall be per the latest Department of Health "Approved List" of Backflow Prevention Devices. Location of device shall be shown on the civil plans and shall show note: "Separate plans and utility permit for DDCVA installation for Fire Sprinkler System will be required". DDCVA installations outside the building shall be in accordance with the City of Renton Standards. For DDCVA installations proposed to be installed inside the building, applicant shall submit a copy of the mechanical plan showing the location and installation of the backflow assembly inside the mechanical room. Installation shall be in accordance with the City of Renton's requirements. DDCVA shall be installed immediately after the pipe has passed through the building floor slab. Installation of devices shall be in the horizontal position only. 8. Buildings which exceed 30 feet in height will require a backflow device to be installed on the domestic water meter(s). SANITARY SEWER 1. A Sanitary Sewer System Development Charge (SDC) of $0.126 per square foot of gross site area will be apply. This is payable at the time the utility permit is issued. A redevelopment credit will apply for existing water services at this site. 2. There is an 8-inch sewer main in Burnett Ave South. i'; 3. If finished floor elevation is below 25 feet, a "tideflexn or similar backflow device will be required to be installed. 4. Floor drains are required by the building department for the parking garage. The system shall be connected to the sanitary sewer. Flows shall be directed through the floor drains that are installed in accordance with the UPC to an exterior oil/water separator. The separator shall be sized to meet a minimum 15-minute retention time for peak flows anticipated in the garage area, but in no case will be less than 200 gallons of storage capacity. The type of interceptor shall be as manufactured by Pipe Inc., Utility Vault Inc., or approved equal SURFACE WATER 1. There are existing storm drainage facilities in Burnett Ave S. 2. A storm drainage plan and drainage report is required. The drainage plan shall include provision for detention and water quality treatment sized for the new impervious surface subject to vehicular access per the KCSWM 1990 Edition. Report shall address all core and any special requirements. 3. Surface Water System Development Charges have been paid in full. No additional fees are owed. 4. Separate structural plans will be required to be submitted for review and approval under a building permit for proposed vault. Special inspection from the building department is required. 5. Roof drains shall be connected to the storm system 5 . 95 Burnett Page 3 of3 TRANSPORTATION/STREET 1. Full street improvements including, but not limited to paving, sidewalks, curb & gutter, storm drain, street signs and streetlights will be required if not already in place. 2. A traffic study will be required for this project. Guidelines are attached. 3. A traffic mitigation fee of $75 per additional generated daily trip shall be assessed as determined by the ITE trip generation manual. 4. All wire utilities shall be installed underground per the City of Renton Under Grounding Ordinance. If three or more poles are required to be moved by the development design, all existing overhead utilities shall be placed underground. GENERAL COMMENTS 1. All construction utility permits for utilities, drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals. All utility plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. Plans shall be prepared by a licensed Civil Engineer. 2. When the utility plans are complete, please submit three (3) copies of the drawings, two (2) copies of the drainage report, permit application and an itemized cost of construction estimate and application fee at the counter on the sixth floor. A fee worksheet is attached for your use, but prior to preparing a check, it is recommended to call 425-430-7266 for a fee estimate as generated by the permit system. 3. The fee for review and inspection of these improvements is 5% of the first $100,000 of the estimated construction costs; 4% of anything over $100,000 but less than $200,000, and 3% of anything over $200,000. Half the fee must be paid upon application. 4. Any proposed rockeries or retaining walls greater than 4 feet in height will be require a separate building permit and will require special inspection. 5. Separate permits for side sewers and water meters for domestic, irrigation and fire sprinkler services are required. cc: Kayren Kittrick DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works MEMORANDUM July 1, 2004 Pre-Application File No. 04-076 Jason JOr~enior Planner 95 Burnett Avenue South Apartments General: We have completed a preliminary review of the pre-application for the above- referenced development proposal. The following comments on development and permitting issues are based on the pre-application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant and the codes in effect on the date of review. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification arid/or concurrence by official decision-makers {e.g., Hearing Examiner, Zoning Administrator, Board of Adjustment, Board of Public Works, and City CounCil}. Review comments may also need to be reyised based on site planning and other design changes required by City staff or made by the applicant. The applicant is encouraged to review all applicable sections of the Renton Municipal Code. The Development Regulations are a\(ailable for purchase for $55, plus tax, from the Finance Division on the first floor of City Hall. Development Regulations are also available for review at no charge in the office of the City Clerk on the 7th floor, at Development Services on the 6th floor and at the Renton Library. Project Proposal: The subject site consists of three parcels located in the vicinity of 95 Burnett Avenue South. The site formerly included the Lande Feed Company, Northwest Pneumatic Electrical Repair and the Purcell Painting & Canber Corp. All buildings have been removed from the site to make way for new development. The proposal is to construct a 110 unit, four-story residential apartment complex over two stories of parking. The upper four levels would contain 25 units each, while 10 townhouse type units are proposed in the front, adjacent to the street level. The townhouse style units would be separated from the parking structure by a three-hour rated post-tensioned slab. The building is proposed to contain several common areas, which would connect to the residential levels. The first parking level would be below grade. Vehicular access to the parking levels would be provided from the northeastern and southeastern corners of the building via Burnett Avenue South. Zoning: The subject site is designated Center Downtown (CD) on the City's Zoning Map. The intent of the CD zone is to provide high-density residential and mixed~use commercial centers serving a regional market as well as adjacent residences. In addition, the subject- site is located within the Downtown Core Area and the Urban Center Design Overlay District. Sensitive Areas: Based on the City's Critical Areas Maps, the site is located in a Seismic Hazard Area. The seismic hazard is related to potential liquefaction of soils during an earthquake event. A geotechnical analysis for the site is required. The analysis needs to assess soil conditions and detail construction measures to assure building stability. In addition to the geotechnical analysis, the applicant will be required to submit an archeological resource survey of the site. In order to complete this report, the applicant 95 Burnett will be required to hire a state approved archeologist to conduct the site investigation and prepare a report to the State Office of Archeology and Historic Preservation. For your use, I have attached a current list of approved consulting firms. Development Standards: The proposal's compliance with the CD zone development standards and the parking regulations is addressed below: Design -The site is subject to the Urban Center Overlay District Regulations RMC 4-3-100, which are available for $10 at the 6th floor reception desk .. These regulations contain both standards and guidelines that affect architectural issues including siting, design, modulation, common open space, access and parking. Several standards are directly applicable to this project and should be considered thoroughly before a detailed design is finalized. Due to the lack of detail in the material submitted, staff was unable to assess compliance in several areas. For example, the amount of common open space/recreation area, landscaping, rooflines and building materials. If need be, the applicant may request a modification from these standards pursuant to RMC section 4-9-100.0. Lot Coverage -For properties located within the Downtown Core Area the standards regarding maximum lot coverage for buildings are not applicable. Density -The permitted density range in the CD zone is a minimum of 25 dwelling units per acre to a maximum of 100 dwelling units per acre (dulac). Density may be increased up to 150 dulac subject to approval of an Administrative Conditional Use permit. Net density is calculated after sensitive areas and areas to be dedicated to publiC right-of-way are deducted from the gross area of the site. There are no sensitive areas or public rights-of-way to be deducted from the gross area of the property. The proposal for 118 units on the 36,347 square foot (0.83 acres) site arrives at a net density of 133 dulac, which is within the density range for the zone, but only allowed with an approved Conditional Use Permit. At this time, staff is in general support of the density increase (conditional use permit); however, more project detail design review is required. Setbacks / Landscaping -No minimum front yard setbacks are required in the Downtown Core Area. In addition, no rear or side yard setbacks are required in the CD zone. Although setback requirements do not apply in this instance, the Urban Center Design Overlay Regulations are quite specific regarding Siting and design treatments to reduce the bulk and scale of the building. The same applies to landscape requirements. Although on-site landscaping requirements do not apply to properties located within the Downtown Core Area, the design regulations are fairly specific regarding screening and landscaping to reduce visual impact. Height -The CD zone allows a maximum building height of 95 feet. The proposed 4 level building, over two levels of parking at its maximum height is 60 feet, which is in compliance with the zoning code requirements. Building elevations and detailed descriptions of elements and building materials are required with your site plan review submittal. Screening -Screening must be provided for all surface-mounted and roof top utility and . mechanical equipment. In addition, garbage dumpsters and recyclable areas must be screened pursuant to RMC section 4-4-090.C.7. Approval of the proposed locations of dumpster areas by Rainier Waste Management is recommended prior to the submittal of the formal land use application. The site plan application will need to include elevations and details for the proposed methods of screening. Parking -The City is currently adopting a new ordinance, which will require properties located within the Downtown Core Area to provide the following parking: 95 Burnett • 1.8 parking stalls per 3 bedroom or larger units; • 1.6 parking stalls per 2 bedroom units; and, • 1.2 parking stalls per 1 bedroom or studio dwelling units. At this time, staff did not have enough information to determine the total number of parking stalls required and if enough parking stalls were being provided. As part of . the formal site plan review submittal, the applicant will be required to demonstrate that the required parking is provided. In addition, structured parking spaces must comply with the following minimum dimensions for standards and compact stalls: • Standards stalls must have a minimum length of 15 feet (16 feet for 45° or greater) and a minimum width of 8 feet, 4-inches; and, • Compact stalls must have a minimum length of 12 feet (13 feet for 45° or greater) and a minimum width of 7 feet, 6 inches. Compact parking spaces are not allowed to exceed 50% of the parking provided. Staff was unable to determine the proposal's compliance with the minimum stall dimension requirements based on the information provided. The parking area for the project is also required to comply with the design regulations of the Urban Center Overlay District. Permit Requirements: The proposal would require Hearing Examiner Site Plan approval and Conditional Use Permit approval, as well as Environmental (SEPA) Review. Hearing Examiner approval is required by City code as the project contains more than 100 units and is four stories in height. The environmental SEPA review would be conducted first, after which staff would prepare a recommendation to the Hearing Examiner for both the Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Review. A public hearing would be conducted and the Hearing Examiner would issue a final decision. The project would receive a decision in an estimated time frame of 12 to 16 weeks once a complete application is accepted. If any appeals are filed, the timeframe may be extended for an additional 4 to 6 weeks. The application fee would be $3,500.00 ($2,000.00 for the Conditional Use Permit, $1,000.00 for the Site Plan Review, and $500.00 for SEPA review) plus $0.37 per mailing label required for notification to surrounding property owners within 300 feet of the site. In addition to the required land use permits, separate construction, building and sign permits would be required. The review of these permits may occur concurrently with the review of the land use permits, but cannot be issued prior to the completion of any appeal periods. Impact Mitigation Fees: In addition to the applicable building and construction fees, the following mitigation fees would be required prior to the issuance of building permits. • A Transportation Mitigation Fee based on $75.00 per new daily trip attributed to the development; • A Parks Mitigation Fee based on $354.51 per new multi-family unit; and, • . A Fire Mitigation Fee based on $388.00 per multi-family unit. A handout listing all of the City's Development related fees in attached for your review. cc: Jennifer Henning 95 Burnett CITY OF RENTON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT NEIGHBORHOODS, AND STRATEGIC PLANNING MEMORANDUM DATE: TO: FROM: STAFF CONTACT: SUBJECT: June 23. 2004 Jasonw~~ / Rebejfa'Hiid . Don Erickson Parkside at 95 Burnett Project, 95 Burnett Ave S; PRE 04-076 The applicant is proposing to develop a six-level apartment project with associated structured (predominantly above grade) parking on Burnett Avenue S south of S Tobin Street. The site was also considered for a multistory apartment building a few years ago. Unlike that proposal which had the parking garage abutting the sidewalk area, this proposal accommodates a row of 10 two- story townhomes between the sidewalk area. This is achieved by siting the parking garage. some 3D-feet to the west of these units. This results in a much more attractive streetscape and will result in the project fitting in better with the emerging neighborhood. A 3-hour firewall will separate the 10 townhome units and garage on the first two levels from the three stories of wood frame apartments above. The building abuts a small city park along its western property line. The .83-acre site is designated Center Downtown, as shown on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map, and zoned CD (Center Downtown). It also is located in the Urban Center Overlay District Relevant land use policies and guidelines are attached. Analysis: The subject proposal appears to comply with the intent of Objectives DT-A and DT-I as well as Policies DT-l and DT-3 in that the proposed residential use should help revitalize the downtown and generate additional demand for goods and services. In terms of relevant district guidelines for building design and siting staff find that the main entrance fronts on Burnett Avenue S but, because no elevations were provided, it is impossible to tell whether this entrance will be "prominent" and highly "visible from the street." The proposed five-story building does appear to transition nicely to the street with the row of townhomes.at street level and the higher mass of the building set some 3D-feet from the street property line. Because there will be nearly 20 feet of exposed parking garage along the western edge with the park, more will likely need to be done here to make an appropriate transition and acceptable compatibility between these disparate uses. Similarly, because of the lack of elevations it is not possible to tell whether the exterior fa~ades are fully modulated or whether decorative roof elements have been employed. In terms of the design of the structured parking component of this development staff note that there are two 20-foot wide garage entrances on the Burnett A venue S side of the building. One apparently serving the upper level of the two-story garage the other the other the lower level of it. Again, because no elevations or detailed sections have been provided it is not possible to determine whether parking is intended to be fully enclosed or screened. If the latter, no indication Parks ide at 95 Burnett Project 06/24/2004 2 of decorative grilles, trellis with landscaping, or decorative walls are provided. Similarly, it is not know whether "garage parking [will] be secured with electronic entries." Regarding the provision of common usable open space the plans indicate the provision of 4,200 square feet above the ten townhomes. With 100 units proposed in the upper structure some 5,000 square feet of common open space would be needed to comply with the· minimum "common space" standard of 50 square feet per unit for housing developments of 10 or more attached units. And, as mentioned before, without elevations it is unclear whether the subject proposal meets the building modulation/articulation provisions. Recommendation: Conceptually support this pre-application for a 110 unit multi-family development noting, however, that additional information must be provided by the applicant (landscaping, the types of exterior materials, colors, screening of parking garages, adequacy of common open space, etc.) before a full design review for compliance with the Urban Centers Overlay District Guidelines can be carried out. Attachment cc: Don Erickson H:\EDNSP\Interdeparunental\Deve!opment Review\Preapps\Comments\CD\Parkside at 95 Burnett Ave S.doc\cor Parkside at 95 Burnett Project 06/23/2004 Relevant Comprehensive Plan Land Use Policies Center Downtown 3 Objective DT-A: Create a balance of land uses which contribute to the revitalization of downtown Renton while fulfilling the requirements of an Urban Center as defined by countywide policies. Policy DT-l. There should be a mix of uses, including retail, office, light industrial and ,residential which generate the demand for goods and services. Policy DT-3. Development and redevelopment of Center Downtown should strive for urban density and intensity of uses. Objective DT-l: Retain existing and attract new businesses that generate consumer oriented commercial activity. Relevant Urban Center District Overlay District Guidelines Building Siting and Design La. (2) Entrance Location. A primary entrance of each building shall be located on the fa~ade facing the street. Such entrances shall be prominent, visible from the street, connected by a walkway to the public sidewalk and include human scale elements. 2.a. Minimum Standards. Careful siting and design treatment is necessary to achieve a compatible transition where new buildings differ from surrounding development in terms of building height, bulk and scale. The following design elements shall be considered to promote a transition to surrounding uses: (1) Setbacks at the side or rear of a building may be increased in order to reduce the bulk and scale of larger buildings and so that sunlight reaches adjacent yards; (2) Building proportions, including step backs on upper levels; (3) Building articulation to divide a larger architectural element into smaller pieces; and (4) Rooflines, pitches, and shapes. 3. Structure/Garage Parking. b. Guidelines: (3) The design of structured parking at finished grade under a building should minimize the apparent width of garage entries. (4) Parking with the building should be enclosed or screened through any combination of walls, decorative grilles, or trellis work with landscaping. (7) Garage parking should be secured with electronic entries. Landscaping/RecreationlCommon Space 1. Common Space a. Minimum Standards: Document2\cor Parkside at 95 Burnett Project 0612312004 4 (1) Attached housing development of 10 or more dwelling units shall provide a minimum area of common space or recreation area equal to 50 square feet per unit. The common space area should be aggregated to provide usable area(s) for residents. Building Architectural Design a. Minimum Standards: Document2\cor (1) All building fa~ades shall include modulation or articulation at intervals of no more than 40 feet. :". " Relevant Comprehensive Plan Land Use Policies Center Downtown Objective DT-A: Create a balance of land uses which contribute to the revitalization of downtown Renton while fulfilling the requirements of an Urban Center as defined by countywide policies. Policy DT-l. There should be a mix of uses, including retail, office, light industrial and residential which generate the demandfor goods and services. Policy DT-3. Development and redevelopment of Center Downtown should strive for urban density and intensity of uses. Objective DT-I: Retain existing and attract new businesses that generate consumer oriented commercial activity. Relevant Urban Center District Overlay District Guidelines Building Siting and Design 1.a. (2) Entrance Location. A primary entrance of each building shall be located on the fa~ade facing the street. Such entrances shall be prominent, visible from the street, connected by a walkway to the public sidewalk and include human scale elements. 2.a. Minimum Standards. Careful siting and design treatment is necessary to achieve a compatible transition where new buildings differ from surrounding development in terms of building height, bulk and scale. The following design elements shall be considered to promote a transition to surrounding uses: 3. (1) Setbacks at the side or rear of a building may be increased in order to reduce the bulk and scale of larger buildings and so that sunlight reaches adjacent yards; (2) Building proportions, including step backs on upper levels; (3) Building articulation to divide a larger architectural element into smaller pieces; and (4) Rooflines, pitches, and shapes. Structure/Garage Parking. N b. Guidelines: I w (3) The design of s ctUTed parking at finished grade under a building should minimize the . parent width of garage entries .. I (4) Parking witIf. the building should be enclosed or screened through any combination of walls, decorative grilles, or trellis work with landscaping. (7) Garage parking should be secured with electronic entries. Landscaping/Recreation/Common Space 1. Common Space a. Minimum Standards: Document2\cor · , CITY C;: RENTON RECEIVED BUILDING DIVISION MEMORANDUM· DATE: TO: Construction Services, Fire Prevention, Plan Review, EDNSP, Project Planner FROM: Neil Watts, Development Services Division Director SUBJECT: New Preliminary Application: q~ /!Jur/left Azc? 5 P/V~. {j LOCATION: 9[; 6A/he# Av-e ~ PREAPP NO. r:1zc04 --076 A me tin with~e applicant has been scheduled for ~_'(aO· , Thursday, I in ·one of the 61h floor conference rooms (new City Hall. 1ft s mooting is scheduled at 10:00 AM, the MEETING MUST BE CONCLUDED PRIOR TO 11:00 AM to allow time to prepare for the 11 :00 AM meeting. Please reView the attached project plans prior to the scheduled meeting with the appliCant. You will not need to do a thorough "permit lever review at this time. Note only major issues that must be resolved priorto fonnalland use and/or building permit application submittal. . Plan Reviewer assigned is %<1N'-:-" I. t\\O ......... Please submit your written comments to (faISon J(J1;;(an (Planner) at least two (2) days before the meeting. Thank you. H:\Division.s\DeveJop.sec\Dev & PJan.ing\TempJate\Preapp2 Revised 9/00 • Printed: 10-26-2004 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON CITY OF RENTON 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Land Use Actions RECEIPT OCT 2 6 2004 R Permit#: LUA04-133 Payment Made~CE'V~~6/2004 03:54 PM Receipt Number: R0405789 Total Payment: 3,000.00 Payee: COLPITTS DEVELOPMENT CO, LLC Current Payment Made to the Following Items: Trans Account Code Description 5009 000.345.81.00.0006 Conditional Use Fees 5010 000.345.81.00.0007 Environmental Review 5020 000.345.81.00.0017 Site Plan Approval Payments made for this receipt Trans Method Description Amount Payment Check 2876 3,000.00 Account Balances Amount 500.00 500.00 2,000.00 Trans Account Code Description Balance Due 3021 303.000.00.345.85 5006 000.345.81.00.0002 5007 000.345.81.00.0003 5008 000.345.81.00.0004 5009 000.345.81.00.0006 5010 000.345.81.00.0007 5011 000.345.81.00.0008 5012 000.345.81.00.0009 5013 000.345.81.00.0010 5014 000.345.81.00.0011 5015 000.345.81.00.0012 5016 000.345.81.00.0013 5017 000.345.81.00.0014 5018 000.345.81.00.0015 5019 000.345.81.00.0016 5020 000.345.81.00.0017 5021 000.345.81.00.0018 5022 000.345.81.00.0019 5024 000.345.81.00.0024 5036 000.345.81.00.0005 5909 000.341.60.00.0024 5941 000.341.50.00.0000 5954 604.237.00.00.0000 5955 000.05.519.90.42.1 5998 000.231.70.00.0000 Park Mitigation Fee Annexation Fees Appeals/Waivers Binding Site/Short Plat Conditional Use Fees Environmental Review Prelim/Tentative Plat Final Plat PUD Grading & Filling Fees Lot Line Adjustment Mobile Home Parks Rezone Routine Vegetation Mgmt Shoreline Subst Dev Site Plan Approval Temp Use or Fence Review Variance Fees Conditional Approval Fee Comprehensive Plan Amend Booklets/EIS/Copies Maps (Taxable) Special Deposits Postage Tax .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT FOR THE PARKSIDE AT 95 BURNETT DEVELOPMENT PROJECT, RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION -NOT FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION October 21, 2004 NWM Report WA 04-85 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON OCT 262004 ·,~~CF'HED NORTHWEST ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. SEATTLE, WASHINGTON I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT FOR THE PARKSIDE AT 95 BURNETT DEVELOPMENT, RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON Report Prepared for TSA Architects, Inc. Bellevue, Washington By Charles M. Hodges and Victoria Piston October 21, 2004 NWAA Report Number: WA 04-85 CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION -NOT FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION Northwest Archaeological Associates, Inc. 5418 -20th Avenue NW, Suite 200 Seattle, Washington 98107 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ABSTRACT NWAA excavated 15 backhoe trenches and 16 shovel probes for the proposed apartment complex Parkside at 95 Burnett in Renton, Washington, on September 15 and 16,2004. One ees lithic flake was found in intact B horizon matrix, and another flake was found in demolition fill nearby. Both flakes were found in probes at the south end of the parcel. No other archaeological materials were found. Because of the presence of buried surfaces under the parcel, NWAA recommends that subgrade excavations be monitored by a qualified archaeologist. Northwest Archaeological Associates, Inc. CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION October 21, 2004 NOT FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION Northwest Archaeological Associates, Inc. CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION ii October 21,2004 NOT FOI3 GENERAL DISTRIBUTION I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ............................................................... i LIST OF FIGURES .......................................................... iv LIST OF TABLES ........................................................... iv INTRODUCTION ........................................................... 1 Regulatory Context ....................................................... 1 Project Location and Description ............................................ 1 SETTING ................................................................. 3 Natural History . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Geology and Geomorphology ...... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Biogeography ......................................................... 4 Paleoenvironments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Cultural History .......................................................... 7 Prehistory ............................................................ 7 Ethnography and Ethnohistory ............................................ 8 History ................................................ ' ............... 9 Previous Archaeological Research ........................................ 10 EXPECTATIONS ...................................... , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 12 METHODS ............................................................... 12 Archival Research ....................................................... 12 Fieldwork Procedures .................................................... 13 RESULTS ................................................................ 13 Archaeological Finds .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 13 Depositional Environments ................................................ 16 DISCUSSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 18 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS ..................................... 21 REFERENCES CITED ...................................................... 23 APPENDIX A: Tribal Correspondence ......................................... A-1 Northwest Archaeological Associates, Inc. CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION iii October 21,2004 NOT FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION Figure 1. Figure 2. Figure 3. Figure 4. Figure 5. Figure 6. Figure 7. Figure 8. Figure 9. Figure 10. Figure 11. LIST OF FIGURES Project Location ................................................. .. 2 The Renton area in 1911 showing the course of the Cedar River in relation to the project area. . ..................................................... 5 Craig Lande in front of the Lande Feed Company in 2001 .................. 10 Unit placement map showing locations of backhoe trenches, shovel probes and geotechnical boreholes ............................................. 14 Removing demolition fill prior to excavating shovel probe. . ................. 15 Using blade welded to bucket teeth to remove demolition fill. . ............... 15 Post/Pier footing mold in wall of Trench 10. . ............................ 16 Sandy gravels exposed at about 8 feet below surface in Trench 4. . .......... 17 Example of bedding in sand overlying gravels. . .......................... 18 Couplets composed of very fine sand and silt at top of depositional sequence. .. 19 Contour map of the surface of the gravels under the project. .............. 20 LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Cultural Resource Investigations in the Vicinity of the Proposed Parkside at 95 Burnett Project, Renton, Washington ................................ 11 Northwest Archaeological Associates, Inc. CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION iv October 21,2004 NOT FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I INTRODUCTION TSA Architects, Inc., (TSA) of Bellevue, Washington has proposed to build an apartment building at 95 Burnett Avenue South in Renton, Washington. The parcel is in a high-probability area for cultural resources near the confluence of the Cedar and Black Rivers. The current Cedar River channel is about 700 feet to the northeast and the former channel of the Black River (now buried under Lake Avenue S) is several hundred feet west of the study area. Since there is an archaeological site near the project on the grounds of the Renton High School two blocks to the west, the City of Renton recommended that a cultural resources assessment of the property be performed prior to construction. Northwest Archaeological Associates, Inc. (NWAA) was retained by TSA to perform the cultural resources assessment of the parcel as part of the Washington State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) review process. Regulatory Context This report provides documentation for information requested under SEPA checklist item 13: Historic and Cultural Preservation. The work performed by NWAA was designed to address the three areas of concern outlined under this checklist item: 13a. Identify places or objects on or adjacent to the project that are listed or proposed for listing on a historic register; 13b. Identify places or objects on or adjacent to the project that are of archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance, and; 13c. Indicate appropriate mitigation measures for historic or cultural resources. NWAA conducted prefield archival research and reviewed the natural and cultural setting of the project area to identify locations of previously known prehistoric and historic cultural properties within the project boundaries and within a half-mile radius beyond the project. The archival research was followed by an archaeological field investigation that examined the parcel for previously unknown cultural resources. Project Location and Description The proposed project is located within Donation Land Claim No. 37, T. 23 N., R. 5 E, Willamette Meridian, in Block 24, City of Renton, just north of downtown Renton (Figure 1). Burnett Avenue South forms the east boundary of the parcel and a pedestrian park bounds the parcel to the west. The parcel is bounded on the north by a METRO sewer easement and on the south by an alley north-adjacent a small building constructed of concrete block. The parcel is the former location of Lande Feed Company, which was demolished in 2002. The proposed building will be a 106-unit apartment building constructed on 0.75 acres at 95 Burnett Avenue South. The parcel measures approximately 109 feet east-west by 330 feet north-south. Parking areas for the building will be both above and below grade with excavation for the below-grade parking area anticipated to be about four feet deep (Personal communication from Kent Smutney, TSA Architects, 24 September 2004 ). Northwest Archaeological Associates, Inc. CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION 1 October 21, 2004 NOT FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION 2 Parkside at 95 Bumett Figure 1. Project Location (USGS Bellevue North [1982] and Renton [1983] 15 x 7.5' quads). Northwest Archaeological Associates, Inc. CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION October 21,2004 NOT FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Parl<side at Bumett 3 SETTING Natural History Archaeological evidence indicates that the Pacific Northwest was occupied by humans soon after land emerged after glacial retreat about 10,000 to 12,000 years ago. Following retreat of the continental ice sheet, changes induced by geomorphology, geology, and climate continued to shape the landscape and influence the people who resided in the Puget Lowland. Large- scale natural processes, such as sea level rise, changes in climate, and earthquakes, affected the distribution of potential resources and contributed to the creation of landforms suitable for human occupation. These same processes have also been responsible for altering the physical character of the archaeological record itself by selectively preserving or destroying sites that contain evidence for how people lived. Geology and Geomorphology The project area is located in the northern portion of the Puget Lowland, an elongated topographic and structural depression oriented north-south bordered on the east by the Cascade Mountains and on the west by the Olympic Mountains. The Puget Lowland is characterized by rolling low-relief topography with deeply incised ravines; in general, the ground surface is within 500 feet of sea level. The Puget Lowland has been glaciated several times during the Pleistocene Epoch (2.8 million years ago to 10,000 years ago) (Booth et al. 2003). During the last glaciation, known as the Vashon Stade of the Fraser glaciation, glaciers originating in the mountains of British Columbia coalesced and spread southward as a broad, continental ice sheet called the Cordilleran ice sheet (Easterbrook 2003). The Puget Lobe, the southwestern most extension of the Cordilleran ice sheet, last advanced into the Puget Lowland about 15,000 years ago and left behind a varied record of both depositional and erosional landforms that dominate the regional landscape today (Porter and Carson 1971; Porter and Swanson 1998). Due to the advance and retreat of the Vashon ice sheet, the surficial geology of the greater Seattle area is now characterized by north-trending ridges and drift uplands with surfaces dotted by small lakes and peat bogs. The uplands are separated by large troughs occupied by the marine waters of Puget Sound and freshwater lakes including Lake Washington and Lake Sammamish (Galster and Laprade 1991; Liesch et al. 1963; Yount et al. 1993). The study area is located near the confluence of the Black and Cedar Rivers near the southern shore of Lake Washington. During ice retreat, glacial lakes at altitudes several hundred feet above current sea level formed behind the retreating Puget lobe as the ice dammed north- flowing streams and the Cedar River was graded to the altitude of these proglacial lakes. When the retreating ice sheet withdrew north past the Strait of Juan de Fuca, Puget Sound was opened to the Pacific Ocean and a connection was established between the sea and the ocean (Dragovich et al. 1994). Because sea level was several hundred feet lower than the level of the former glacial lakes, the Cedar River began downcutting through the accumulated glacio- lacustrine and deltaic sediments deposited during the proglaciallake phase of ice retreat. The Cedar River cut rapidly into the glacial sediments along the course that had been established during glacial retreat (Evans and Jensen 1996) and began forming a new, lower, alluvial fan- delta complex near its confluence with the Black River just south of Lake Washington. The Northwest Archaeological Associates, Inc. CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION October 21,2004 NOT FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION 4 Parkside at 95 Burnett Cedar River delta probably blocked off Lake Washington shortly after ice retreat and forced the lake to drain around the toe of the Cedar River fan to the Duwamish embayment by way of the Black River. As the Cedar River continued to build its fan, it flowed at various times to Lake Washington, to the Black River, and directly to Duwamish Valley (Mullineaux 1970; Thorson and Leopold 1997). The lower Cedar River was channelized in 1912 after the flood of 1911 had inundated the Black River and Cedar River floodplains between Earlington Hill and Renton Hill (Slauson 1976). Channel shifting along the Renton Reach (the lower 1.6 miles of the river) ceased altogether by 1916 when Lake Washington was lowered after construction of the Lake Washington Ship Canal at Union Bay (Perkins 2004) (Figure 2). Lake Washington, with a drainage area encompassing 182 square miles, is the largest lake west of the Cascade Range and the second largest natural lake in the state of Washington. Prior to construction of the Lake Washington Ship Canal, mean seasonal water level in Lake Washington was 8.8 feet higher than at present and the lake fluctuated as much as seven feet between wet and dry seasons. The Lake Washington hydrologic system included the Sammamish River, which was the major tributary to the lake, and the Black River, which formed the lake's natural outflow to Puget Sound. The Cedar River joined the Black River a short distance downstream from the outlet of the lake and, though not normally entering the lake, was an occasional source of water to the lake basin when the river flooded (Chrzastowski 1983; Crandell and Miller 1974). The Cedar River originally traversed a broad alluvial fan in the vicinity of the City of Renton before flowing into the Black River (Perkins 2004); the channel was braided in depositional zones and actively migrated back and forth across its floodplain. Between 1865 and 1936, river width in the lower reaches was reduced from 250 feet to 170 as a result of channelization, bank stabilization, and dam construction in the upper reaches of the river. At the same time, channel planform changed from a braided river pattern with multiple channels to a sinuous, generally single-threaded pattem (Perkins 2004). Sediments on the floor of the Cedar River valley consist largely of narrow strips of pebble-and- cobble gravel and coarse sand in and near the river channel, and broader flanking deposits of sand and silt. In several places, however, the coarse channel materials cover as much as half the breadth of the flood plain. The flanking silt and sand appears to be only a few feet thick over gravel in much of the valley, but in places gravel-free deposits are as much as 10 feet thick (Mullineaux 1970). The Black River is now buried under Lake Avenue S. Renton Airport occupies much of the marshland formerly located along the southem shoreline of Lake Washington. Biogeography Northwest Washington is characterized by a temperate maritime climate regime with warm summers and moderate winters. Summer average temperatures are about 61°F; during the winter temperatures average about 40°F. Rainfall is typically light during summers so that several weeks can pass without precipitation but winters experience frequent rains with the highest amounts of precipitation occurring late in fall and in winter. Northwest Archaeological AssOCiates, Inc. CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION October 21,2004 NOT FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Pari<side at Burnett 5 LAKE WASHINGTON ........ Lake Washington. Renton. Rainier Bcac:h Waterfront District / f ..... , , .... -, ~,~._ •· ..... 0 ... _ .... ...... .I t. .... y~.ru.-¥ ..... . I "=-.............. _- l'QI"~ ~,~. A.i~Ja ~ ..... -•• _. Figure 2. The Renton area in 1911 showing the course of the Cedar River in relation to the project area. The river was channelized the following year (Courtesy of Seattle Municipal Archives). Northwest Archaeological Associates, Inc. CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION October 21,2004 NOT FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION 6 Parlcside at 95 Bumett The Puget Lowland is covered with extensive stands of coniferous forest that comprise the Tsuga heterophylla (western hemlock) vegetation zone. The dominant tree species comprising the forests of this zone are western hemlock, western red cedar, and Douglas fir. Old growth forest understories are typically dense, consisting of shrubs and herbaceous species dominated by sword fern, salal, Oregon grape, ocean spray, blackberry, red huckleberry, and red elderberry (Franklin and Dymess 1973). Bigleaf maple and red alder are common in moist areas subject to disturbance; stream courses and flood plains are dominated by red alder, black cottonwood, bigleaf maple, and other riparian plants. Wetlands are common in river valleys and typically support willow, alder, cranberries, cattail, reeds, wapato, nettles, and skunk cabbage (Frenkel and Heinitz 1987). According to Chatters (1981), in the mid-nineteenth century, surveyors for the General Land Office observed young stands of trees covering the hills on either side of the Cedar River, on Earlington Hill, and on the hills west of the Green River. Mature stands characterized the remaining land west of the river. Small prairies and meadows, possibly permanent, were scattered on the flood plain and in forested areas. The dominant vegetation on the flood plain was black cottonwood and willow growing primarily on the natural levees with cattail and associated willow, hardhack, and other aquatic plants growing in marshes fringed by willow thickets (Chatters 1981). " The Puget Lowland has historically supported large populations of mammals, fish, and birds. Large mammals include black-tailed deer, elk, and black bear; fur-bearing and small mammals include rabbit, fox, wolf, mountain lion, muskrat, and beaver. Freshwater fish such as trout, whitefish, and suckers live in the rivers"and lakes; three species of salmon (chinook, chum, and coho) move through southem Puget Sound and up the Black River on their way to spawning grounds in the Cedar River watershed. Lakes, ponds, rivers and marshes hosted migratory and resident waterfowl (Kruckeberg 1991). Marine mammals residing in Puget Sound, either year- round or seasonally, include harbor seal, sea lion, porpoise, orca, and grey whale. In addition to salmon, cod, sole, herring and other fish are also found in southem Puget Sound. Shellfish include mussels, clams, cockles, barnacles, sea urchins, crabs; scallops are present in deeper waters (Kruckeberg 1991). The arrival of British and American settlers beginning in the 1830s led to rapid alterations of the landscape in the Puget Lowland. Natural habitats have been affected by the introduction of non-native species such as Himalayan blackberries and Scotch broom, as well as by fire suppression, logging, mining, agriculture, and urban development. By 1900 all the timber had been cut around the shores of Lake Washington and the only areas of virgin timber stands were in the upland east of Lake Washington (Davis 1973). Paleoenvironments Regional pollen data recovered from cores in lakes and wetlands around Puget Sound show substantial shifts in the composition and distribution of regional vegetation since the end of the Pleistocene (Tsukada 1982; Whitlock 1992). Plant species that colonized the Puget Lowland immediately following ice retreat included lodgepole pine, bracken fern, and red alder. These pioneer species were soon followed by Douglas fir a few centuries later (Barnosky 1985). As the climate continued warmed with commencement of the Holocene, grasslands and oak/hazel woodlands were established and, after a brief period of suppression, Douglas fir became the dominant tree species between 10,500 and 7,000 years ago. At the height of postglacial Northwest Archaeological ASSOCiates, Inc. CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION October 21,2004 NOT FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION I I I I I I I I I I I I I -I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I PaIKside at Bumett 7 warming, between 10,000 and 5,000 years ago, effective moisture decreased and the precipitation pattern exhibited a markedly seasonal pattem characterized by increased levels of summer drought. During this period, fires were more common and local prairies in the central Puget Lowland and San Juan Islands expanded their ranges. After about 7,000 years ago, cedar and hemlock pollen began to increase and continued to do so until about 5,000 years ago. The modern climate regime was established by 5,000 to 4,000 years ago in which cool, moist conditions and closed canopy climax forests came to predominate (Tsukada 1982; Whitlock 1992). The climate since then has been marked by small-scale changes fluctuating between warmer/drier and cooler/moist conditions (Leopold et al. 1982). Local climate conditions have been inferred from sedimentologic and pollen data retrieved from a core in Lake Washington. The basal 1.5 m of the core consisted-of a blue silty clay containing the remains of marine diatoms and pine pollen accompanied by lesser amounts of spruce, mountain hemlock, and grass pollen (Leopold et al. 1982). Radiocarbon age assays on organic matter contained in the clay indicate the clay was deposited prior to 13,400 years ago. Higher in the core overlying the clay were found partially laminated silts dating to between 13,400 and 11,000 years ago. These sediments contained progressively greater amounts of organic matter, lignin, and pollen. Only freshwater plankton were present and, together with the laminated sediments, indicate that the basin became a freshwater lake during this time period. Pollen types found in the core were dominated by pine with lesser amounts contributed by spruce and alder, and bracken fern spores, suggesting that during this time the landscape around Lake Washington was similar to present-day boreal forest settings (Leopold et al. 1982). The period after 11,000 years ago in the Puget Lowland is recorded in the Lake Washington core by an initial high influx of Douglas fir pollen accompanied by pollen from alder, Douglas fir, and grass, suggesting the overall vegetation pattern had changed to an open forest. The abundant pollen of successional plant species and the presence of charcoal suggest the landscape was subject to frequent fires. The most recent period is marked by rapid increase in western red cedar pollen beginning about 7,000 years ago immediately above a layer of Mazama ash (at about 400 crn depth below the sediment/water interface) (Leopold et al. 1982). At the time the first settlers arrived in Renton and Seattle in the 1850s, the region was thickly forested. The dominant trees were Douglas fir, red cedar, and western hemlock with much less common spruce and fir. The trees were large, often 6 feet to 8 feet in diameter, and reached heights of 300 feet. Red alder and cottonwood were the only abundant deciduous trees and were limited to river flood plains and disturbed land (Davis 1973). Cultural History Prehistory Archaeological sites and isolated finds attest to the presence of people in coastal western Washington and southern British Columbia by at least 11,000 years ago (Carlson 1990);(Matson and Coupland 1995). People living in North America during this time period are referred to as Paleoindian and the appearance of these earliest groups of people is distinguished by a highly distinctive projectile point style, called Clovis, notable for fluting at the base. The earliest radiocarbon ages associated with these types of points in the West date to about 12,000 years ago. Several of these points have been found west of the Cascade Northwest Archaeological Associates, Inc. CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION October 21, 2004 NOT FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION 8 Parlcside at 95 Burnett Mountains in Washington. A basalt fluted point was found on Whidbey Island (Shong and Miss 2002), a fluted point fashioned from chert was discovered within peat deposits near Maple Valley south of Seattle (Meltzer & Dunnell 1987), and other finds have been found near Olympia in the southem Puget Lowland and in the Chehalis River valley (Morgan 1999; Schalk 1988). The Clovis people are believed to have been big-game hunters whose economy focused on hunting megafauna, such as the mammoth, that became extinct soon after the end of the last glaciation. Other early Holocene archaeological sites in westem North America contain projectile points types -such as large stemmed, shouldered, and lanceolate styles -that closely follow, or are contemporaneous with, the Clovis pOints. In westem Washington, the regional manifestation of these early Holocene economies has been termed the Ollcott Phase ((Kidd 1964) also see discussion in Morgan 1999) and is characterized by sites in upland settings on glacial till containing highly weathered artifacts dominated by heavy cobble spalls, scrapers and choppers. The site assemblages also contain smaller amounts of flakes, cores, finished knife blades, and stemmed and willow-leaf-shaped points {Matson & Coupland 1995 #3360};(Nelson 1990). The period between about 9,000 and 4,000 years ago marks the emergence of economies devoted to utilizing resources from a broader range of environments. Archaeological sites contain artifact assemblages that are composed of medium-sized notched and contracting stem, triangular projectile points. Ground stone tools, including ground slate points, and limited stone and wood carvings begin to appear toward the end of the period, along with evidence for new fishing, sea mammal hunting, and shellfish procurement technologies (Matson and Coupland 1995). Sites dating after about 5,000 years ago are more common and indicate that the subsistence base expanded to include a broad spectrum of locally available resources that included large and small mammals, shellfish, fish, berries, roots and bulbs. Between 3,000 B.P. and 1,000 B.P. there emerged a semi-sedentary settlement pattem focused on movement between a central village and dispersed highly specialized seasonal camps. The recent phases are attested by increasingly sophisticated use of storage technology and facilities, increased population with more seasonal aggregation, and emergence of ranked societies. The final 1,000 years of coast prehistory is characterized by the development of permanent houses in central villages, a salmon-based subsistence economy, and ascribed social status (Matson and Coupland 1995; Morgan 1999). Ethnography and Ethnohistory The Seattle area was occupied by several closely affiliated groups, collectively referred to as the Duwamish, who lived in the Duwamish, Black, and Cedar River watersheds, and along the shores of Lake Washington, Lake Union, and Elliot Bay. The Duwamish wintered in permanent villages conSisting of several long houses constructed of large cedar timbers and occupied by several families. Villages were typically located on lower river courses, at river mouths, and in sheltered bays. Food stored at the villages fed people during the winter. During the spring the inhabitants dispersed to seasonal camps. Summer food consisted of salmon and other fish, bulbs, roots, berries, game, and waterfowl. Some of these foods were gathered in large quantities, processed, dried, and stored for winter consumption. Camps were shifted to Northwest Archaeological AssOCiates, Inc. CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION October 21, 2004 NOT FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Parkside at Burnett different places throughout the summer as resources became available, and in the late fall, people returned to their winter villages (Smith 1940). Permanent settlement by non-native peoples began in the mid-nineteenth century, but prior to their arrival native populations had already been ravaged by introduced diseases. Smallpox probably swept through Puget Sound in the middle 1700s and, along with other diseases, may have severely reduced the population prior to the arrival of the first Euroamerican settlers. Captain Vancouver noted smallpox scars on many of the adults he encountered during his explorations of the Puget Sound in 1792 (Campbell 1989; Chatters 1981). 9 In 1855 the Duwamish along with the Suquamish, Sammamish, Snoqualmie, Snohomish, and other groups, signed the Treaty of Point Elliot, which forced some groups to relocate to reservations. The people living along the Black River were opposed to moving, although several moved eventually to the Port Madison and Tulalip reservations. Later, some Duwamish moved to the Muckleshoot Reservation on the White River. One group remained on the Black River in a small village located just over 0.25 mile southwest of the project area. It had an estimated population of 50 in 1865. The village consisted of small plank and mat houses and persisted until the early 20th century when the land was purchased in 1953 for the site of the Renton Shopping Center (Chatters 1981; Slauson 1976). Another village was located about 0.5 mile northwest of the project area at the confluence of the Cedar and Black Rivers, now under the Renton Airport. History In 1845 the first land claim was filed on Elliot Bay and by 1851 several homesteads had been taken on the Duwamish River. Early in 1853, Henry Tobin filed a claim along the Black River, and by the end of 1853 more claims had been filed along the White, Black, and Green Rivers. The Henry Tobin claim encompassed the project area and much of the area south of the Black- Cedar confluence. After Tobin died in 1856 Erasmus Smithers married his widow and added his homestead acreage to the Tobin property (Chatters 1981; Kramer et al. 2001; Slauson 1976). The City of Renton was platted in 1875 on the Smithers-Tobin lands (Stein 1999). Although Renton's early economy was industrial and based primarily on lumber and coal, early settlement in the vicinity of the project area was characterized primarily by subsistence farming. Rapid expansion of commercial opportunities and markets for Renton area farms and industries began with the arrival of the Northern Pacific (NP) Railroad in Tacoma in 1873. Renton was connected to the NP when the Seattle and Walla Walla Railroad reached Renton in 1877 to haul coal from the Renton and Newcastle areas (Lange 1999). Hops were the first large-scale commercial crop and were grown to take advantage of European demand. Beginning about the mid-1890s, dairying began to supplant hop production after disease and reduced demand made hop farming commercially unviable. The Smithers dairy in Renton was an active enterprise until about 1953 when the land was purchased for the Renton Shopping Center. Before 1957, most land in the valley was in individual farm ownership but in the late 1950s large plots were bought by corporations and railroads in anticipation of changes to land-use zoning. The first industrial park was built In 1961 and in the mid-1960s The Boeing Company completed construction of its aerospace center. Northwest Archaeological Associates, Inc. CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION October 21,2004 NOT FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION 10 Pari<side at 95 Burnett Coal was first mined in King County in 1853 on the Black River near Renton, but only a small amount was produced. Production gradually increased and peaked in the Renton area between 1900 and 1920; for the state as a whole, coal output peaked in 1918 at 4 million tons. The last recorded production in the Renton area was in 1957 (Beikman et al. 1961).· The lot to be occupied by the proposed Pari<side at 95 Burnett project was the location of a feed-and-seed business called Lande Feed Company (Figure 3). The company was started in 1925 when Clarence Lande purchased a building that formerly housed a Grange Hall and speakeasy at 95 Burnett Avenue (South County Journal, August 9,2001). The building is believed to have been built in the late 19th century; it first appears in the public record when the City of Renton incorporated in 1902 (Renton Reporter, October 4, 1996). During its heyday, the company had a mill for custom grinding feed, and boasted a concrete loading dock. Philip Lande, Clarence Lande's son, bought the store in 1966; Craig Lande, Philip's son, managed the company until he vacated the building in 2002 (Renton Reporter, April 3, 2002). The building was demolished soon after. The pedestrian park west of the parcel is the location of a former Northern Pacific Railroad spur that served the Lande Feed Company (Stan Green, Renton Historical Museum, personal communication, September 27, 2004). Previous Archaeological Research The Cedar-Black River confluence has been the subject of several archaeological investigations beginning in the 1980s (Table 1). These studies have ranged from survey and assessments to more comprehensive data recovery excavations. The early studies were conducted under the auspices of the Office of Public Archaeology affiliated with the University Figure 3. Craig Lande in front of the Lande Feed Company in 2001 (South County Journal April 27). Northwest Archaeological Associates, Inc. CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION October 21, 2004 NOT FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Pari<side at Bumett 11 Table 1. Cultural Resource Investigations in the Vicinity of the Proposed Parkside at 95 Burnett Project, Renton, Washington. REFERENCE TYPE OF RELATIONSHIP TO RESOURCES DOCUMENTED INVESTIGATION PROJECT Trudel and Larson 2004 Monitoring -testing Outside, % mile SW Little Cedar River Fishing Site: 45-KI-587 Kaehler et al. 2004 (Final report) Excavation Outside, % mile E Two features at 45-KI-686 Hodges 2004 Assessment Outside, 'Is mile W No archaeological materials found Shong and Hodges 2003 Assessment Outside, % mile SW No archaeological materials found Trudel and Larson 2003 Assessment Outside, % mile SW No archaeological materials found Lewarch et al. 2003 Excavation Outside, % mile E Two features at 45-KI-686 Kramer et al. 2001 (Dec. 6) Excavation Outside, 'AI mile W 45-KI-501 (Data Recovery) Kramer and Larson 2001 b Monitoring Outside, 'AI mile W 45-KI-501 Kramer and Larson 2001 a Monitoring Outside, 'AI mile W No archaeological materials found Lewarch et al. 1996 Monitoring -inadvertent Outside, % mile SW 45-KI-151 discovery Lewarch 1994 Monitoring -inadvertent Outside, % mile SW 45-KI-439 discovery Chatters et al. 1990 Excavation Outside, 1 mile SW 45-KI-59 Chatters 1981 Excavation Outside, % mile SW 45-KI-151 of Washington. Later investigations have been guided by cultural resource regulations and have been conducted by private archaeological consulting firms in conjunction with development in the Renton urban area. The archaeological study closest to the project area was conducted at the Renton High School Site (45-KI-501) west of Burnett Avenue. Archaeological methods included trenching and shovel probing to assess buried deposits. Archaeological materials associated with multiple occupations and flood event strata were found distributed throughout the southern portion of the school grounds. Most of the occupation surfaces consisted of horizontal living surfaces marked by discrete areas of burned matrix containing small fragments of charcoal, ash, and calcined fish and mammal bone. Most intact cultural deposits were about three feet below the current ground surface at the southern end of the property. No archaeological materials were encountered on the north half of the school grounds. A radiocarbon assay on charcoal returned an age ranging between 0 to 299 years before present (Kramer et al. 2001). East of Burnett Avenue, archaeological materials were found during construction of the Henry Moses Aquatic Center in 2003 (Kaehler et al. 2004). Two hearths in alluvial sediments were exposed by archaeological excavations. The first hearth was an area of charcoal-stained matrix in which no fire-modified rock was found but charred wood, charcoal, and hazelnut shells were collected from it. The radiocarbon age of the charred wood was determined to be about 291 years B.P. The second hearth feature produced 21 pieces of fire-modified rock, charcoal fragments, and burnt matrix but no faunal or other botanical remains (Kaehler et al. 2004). Several prehistoric sites are located along the Black River downstream from Burnett Avenue. The White Lake site (45K1438 and -438A) is at the former confluence of the Black and Green Rivers (Lewarch et al. 1996). The site consisted of two shell-bearing cultural layers associated with charcoal, fire modified rock, fish and mammal bone, and lithic artifacts. A fragment of modified bone and two pieces of folded copper believed to be associated with fishhook Northwest Archaeological Associates, Inc. CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION October 21, 2004 NOT FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION 12 Pamside at 95 Burnett manufacturing were also found. Excavations at the nearby 45KI51 site, which may be the ethnographic village of Sba'badi'd (Chatters 1981; Waterman 1920), revealed a possible longhouse foundation associated with two distinct habitation areas dating to AD 1790-1825 and AD 1850-1856, respectively. Two hundred feet away is 45KI439 where midden matrix, hearths, and historic artifacts were found under a parking lot. Nearby, on the opposite bank of the former Black River channel, is Tua/dad Altu (Chatters et al. 1990) where hearths, midden, and artifacts were found buried beneath sterile recent alluvium. Radiocarbon ages indicate occupation about 1,400 years ago (Chatters et al. 1990; Lewarch et al. 1996). EXPECTATIONS The presence of a late-period prehistoric archaeological site just west of the project at the Renton High School and the fact that recorded ethnographic/ethnohistoric villages are located at the confluence of the Black and Cedar Rivers and downstream from the project area along the Black River indicate that it is highly probable that prehistoric archaeological materials are present in the project area. Because the lower Cedar River is characterized by an aggrading alluvial fan, the potential for intact buried archaeological materials to be preserved within alluvium was considered to be high. Since the buildings and structures comprising the Lande Feed Company had been demolished prior to the start of fieldwork, and there are now no standing buildings on the lot, the probability of encountering historic buildings and structures was considered extremely low. Archaeological remains associated with the feed company were expected to be found, but were not expected to retain integrity of design or association. METHODS The methods employed by NWAA to conduct the assessment of the Parkside at 95 Burnett project were geared to subsurface exploration. The assessment was designed to identify potential culture-bearing buried surfaces under the demolition fill to the depth of antiCipated ground disturbance during construction. Archival Research Prior to conducting fieldwork, NWAA searched archival materials at the Washington Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (OAHP) in Olympia, Washington, for information on previously recorded sites and reports of archaeological investigations. Publications on local history and manuscripts housed in the NWAA corporate library were also consulted. The published Quatemary geological literature was examined with particular attention to reports and articles pertaining to glacial and tectonic research in the Seattle/Renton area. Online sources were consulted for reports and synopses of current research relevant to the project. Historical reports, maps, and photographs from the University of Washington Libraries, the Seattle Public Library, and the Renton Historical Museum were consulted for information on local history and land-use modifications at the confluence of the Cedar and Black Rivers. Northwest Archaeological ASSOCiates, Inc. CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION October 21, 2004 NOT FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 'I I I I I I I I I I I I I Parkside at Bumett 13 Fieldwork Procedures Two NWAA archaeologists conducted the fieldwork on September 15 and 16, 2004. Because demolition debris and fill reduced the effectiveness of pedestrian survey and obscured visibility of the surface, the field effort focused on investigating the project area with a combination of shovel probes and backhoe trenches. Fifteen backhoe trenches and 16 shovel probes (SPs) were excavated at approximately 20-meter intervals across the lot (Figure 4). Shovel probes were excavated at 20 m intervals in a grid pattern across the lot. Prior to excavating each probe, the demolition fill to a depth just above intact sediments was removed with the backhoe (Figure 5). Each probe was 40 cm in diameter and was excavated in 20-cm increments; the matrix was screened through 1/4-inch hardware mesh. Information on archaeological materials and sedimentary matrix was recorded on shovel probe reporting forms. Archaeological materials found in the probes were bagged by level and then returned to the probe during backfilling. The shovel probes were excavated down the base of the modem soil, indicated by a change in soil color (the modern soil is darker than the underlying matrix). Probe depth averaged about 60 cm below surface (cmbs). The backhoe trenches were excavated with a track-mounted hoe using a bucket with a straight- edge welded over the bucket teeth (Figure 6). The backhoe removed demolition fill in two-inch- thick increments. Once the fill was removed, the archaeological fieldcrew examined the exposed underlying intact sediments. If no archaeological materials, features, or anthropically enhanced horizons (soil horizons enriched by the addition of human-produced organic materials) were observed, excavation of the trench continued to a total depth of four feet. Each bucket was visually examined for artifacts and individual loads were selected for troweling, but no matrix was screened. Three north-south-oriented lines of backhoe trenches were excavated with the trenches in each line spaced about 20 m apart. When a trench had reached the terminating depth of 130 cmbs (4 feet), the walls of each trench were scraped and inspected for archaeological materials and features. The vertical depositional sequence in the center west wall of each trench was described on standard forms and each trench profile was recorded with digital photographs. Selected trenches were excavated deeper to the extent of the backhoe boom (about 12 feet) or to the top of gravel- bearing sediments. Photographs, field forms, and other documents are housed at the NWAA offices in Seattle. RESULTS Archaeological Finds Demolition fill was ubiquitous across the parcel. The fill was not screened, but material observed included milled lumber and wood planking, bricks and brick fragments, concrete, gardenhose, feedbags (some still full), coal, a plastic construction cone, other plastic objects, sewer pipe fragments, and so on. The fill thickness averaged about two feet; the greatest depth to which the fill extended was in Trench 11 in the southwest corner of the parcel where it extended to four feet overlying a concrete pad. Northwest Archaeological Associates, Inc. CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION October 21, 2004 NOT FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION 14 Parkside at 95 Burnett Parking Lot Sewer Easement (covered in quarry spalls) .1S Graveled Open I Area I I 014 I -$-.4 Pedestrian Park OS (former NP RR spur) m c 3 McLendon Hardware ID ::; Lumber Shed ~ 013 ID ::l i$' ~ c "jij ID ,(,,\7> ~ In ~t>: Q.I 0 'U C .... 010 i$' 7i ';i; ;:r -$- q}oS ~ 0 12 19 ~2 I I I d 1 .-I 0 2 I I I 11 I N (true) I 110 .1 I I SO feet dS I I 1,.1014 I .-0 12 I 013 -$-! I Trench -Excavated> 4 feet alleyway 0 Trench -Excavated to 4 feet S{] 0 Negative Shovel Probe Concrete-block • Positive Shovel Probe Structure .-Borehole Location (Geotech Consultants, Inc.) Figure 4. Unit placement map showing locations of backhoe trenches, shovel probes and geotechnical boreholes (Locations of boreholes courtesy of Geotech Consultants, Inc.). Northwest Archaeological Associates, Inc. CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION October 21,2004 NOT FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Pari<side at Bumett 15 Figure 5. Removing demolition fill prior to excavating shovel probe. Figure 6. Using blade welded to bucket teeth to remove demolition fill. Northwest Archaeological Associates, Inc. CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION October 21,2004 NOT FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION 16 Parkside at 95 Burnett An alignment of pier/footing molds provided the only evidence for historical structural remains found in the study area. These were exposed in the west wall profiles of Trenches 3, 4, and 5 and in the east wall of Trench 10 (Figure 7). One lithic flake, composed of black cryptocrystalline silicate (CCS), was found in SP 1 at the contact between the fill and the underlying intact sediment. Four probes were placed around the discovery shovel probe to determine if additional archaeological materials were present. One more lithic flake, red CCS, was found in demolition fill in SP 16 west-adjacent to SP 1. No other archaeological materials were found. Depositional Environments The field investigation focused on examining the vertical depoSitional sequence under the project area for evidence of buried surfaces. Buried soil horizons are an indication of surfaces that have been buried and preserved by subsequent sedimentation, and the formation of a soil denotes a period of relative landscape stability (that is, there has been enough time elapsed between depositional events for a soil to develop). During periods of rapid deposition, when surfaces are briefly exposed and soils do not develop, contacts between depositional units can be used to indicate former surfaces. In these cases the briefly exposed surfaces are marked by vertical changes in mode of deposition. The identification of buried surfaces is an important component in assessing potential for a deposit to harbor archaeological resources. The overall depositional sequence consists of basal sandy pebble-and cobble-gravel overlain by a set of well-stratified sand beds characterized by intact primary sedimentary structures. Figure 7. Post/Pier footing mold in wall of Trench 10. Northwest Archaeological Associates, Inc. CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION October 21, 2004 NOT FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Parkside at Bumett The upper sand beds gradually give way to interbedded silt and very fine sand, or to a bioturbated, mostly massive, silty very fine sand that persists up to the contact with the overlying demolition fill. Most of the soil horizon sequence in the uppermost deposit has been removed by historical land use, but in some trenches and shovel probes a thin remnant of the lower Bw horizon could still be discerned. 17 Depth to the gravel-bearing sediments varies from about 6 feet below surface to greater than 12 feet (beyond the limits of the backhoe boom). The top of the gravelly sediments is characterized by a gravel armor typically one-grain-thick and immediately overlying sandy gravels (Figure 8). Organic staining, detrital charcoal, and fragments of wood flotsam in a fine- grained matrix ranging from fine sand to silt were found resting on the gravels in the eastern half of the parcel in Trenches 1,3,7,8,9, and 10. The gravels were beyond the reach of the backhoe (that is, deeper than 12 feet) in Trenches 4 and 15 in the northern portion of the project. The gravels are overlain by a set of well-stratified, very well-sorted sand beds. Primary sedimentary structures were well preserved and included lateral accretion deposits, trough cross-bedding, ripple bedding of several types, plane bedding, and low-amplitude dunes (Figure 9). Flow direction indicators suggest that the overall paleoflow trend was westerly, but that during individual depositional events flow direction was highly variable and ranged from southwest to northwest. The top of the depositional sequence exhibits more place-to-place variability than the two underlying depositional units and consists of bedded sand and silt or a massive bioturbated silty very fine sand. Bedding was overall more obscured in this deposit due to disturbance from Figure 8. Sandy gravels exposed at about 8 feet below surface in Trench 4. Northwest Archaeological Associates, Inc. CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION October 21,2004 NOT FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION 18 Pari<side at 95 Burnett plant roots and burrowing fauna, but in some trenches sand-silt couplets could still be discerned (Figure 10). The distribution of gravels suggested that the project area was underlain by an extensive gravel sheet. The variation in depth to the top of the gravels further suggested the possibility that a channel-and-bar complex might characterize the top of the gravels. To determine if a paleochannel could be defined, the paleotopography of the gravel-bearing deposits was reconstructed using data from the backhoe trenches and geotechnical borehole logs (Figure 11). Though not conclusive because of the limited spatial extent, the reconstruction shows that the surface of the gravels dips steeply to the northwest and to the west. This suggests the gravels are the bedload of a channel complex that was subsequently infilled with finer-grained braided channel and overbank sediments. The relief of the upper bounding contact of the gravels further suggests that part of the project area is over a bar complex or a larger dissected in-channel bar. The presence of flotsam and organic staining at the top of the gravels in some places suggested that the top of the gravels was a comparatively stable surface on which a soil was beginning to develop. DISCUSSION Previous excavations and trench exposures at Sbabadid (Chatters 1981), the Fred Meyer Store (Lewarch 1994), and the Renton High School (Kramer et al. 2001» show that culture-bearing matrices and sheet-like midden deposits, if present, are readily recognized in backhoe trench profiles. For example, Chatters (1981) noted that at Sbabadid, fire hearths could clearly be seen; furthermore, he was able to clearly distinguish layers of ash, bone, charcoal, and human- Figure 9. Example of bedding in sand overlying gravels. Northwest Archaeological Associates, Inc. CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION October 21,2004 NOT FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Parlcside at Burnett 19 Figure 10. Couplets composed of very fine sand and silt at top of depositional sequence. introduced sand and gravel exposed along trench walls. Kramer and her colleagues at Renton High School noted that the culture-bearing matrices were recognizable as " ... horizontal living surfaces with many features of burned earth containing small pieces of charcoal, ash, calcined fish, and mammal bone" (Kramer et al. 2001 :24). At Renton High School, most of the cultural deposits were encountered within the upper three feet below the modern surface and similar depths to culture-bearing strata are also reported from Sbabadid by Chatters (Chatters 1981). Discrete, spatially well-bounded archaeological features have been found elsewhere in King County in areas of channel filling or overbank deposition, especially where stream channels undergo rapid lateral shifting. For example, NWAA found a 1-meter-diameter, spatially well- bounded, fire-modified rock (FMR) feature near the top of an abandoned channel fill sequence at Auburn Narrows on the Green River floodplain near Auburn (Shong, 2004, in prep.). Another spatially discrete isolated FMR feature was recorded near the confluence of the Snoqualmie and Tolt Rivers (Robbins and Dugas 2000). This feature was found in sediments at the top of a fining-upward sequence representing overbank deposition and infilling of a former channel of the Tolt River. Farther upstream from the Tolt confluence on the Snoqualmie River, a point bar across from Falls City contained numerous discrete archaeological deposits interbedded with fine-grained well-stratified point bar deposits (Christian Miss, NWAA, personal communication, 2004). Trudel and Larson (2003) have suggested that in the Cedar River-Black River confluence, recently abandoned channels filled with sandy overbank materials would be preferred site locations because of the level topography, well-drained sandy substrate, and relative lack of vegetation cover. Being located within the Cedar River-Black River confluence area would Northwest Archaeological Associates, Inc. CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION October 21, 2004 NOT FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION 20 make these areas particularly attractive for either long-or short-term occupations because of their proximity to resource-rich areas. The depositional sequence exposed in the backhoe trenches suggests that the parcel at one time was a fairly level area characterized by a sandy substrate, and thus exhibits potential to contain small, discrete clusters of archaeological materials. These comments suggest a backhoe was an efficient way to examine the sediments underlying the parcel for the presence of buried soils or subsurface lithostratigraphic bounding contacts where archaeological materials would be most likely found. Since buried soils and bounding contacts represent breaks in deposition, locating and traCing the extent of these was considered the most reliable way of finding associated CUlture-bearing deposits. The depositional sequence exposed in the backhoe trenches indicates formation Pedestrian Park (former NP RR spur) I N (true) 50 feet o Backhoe Trench -NWAA ... Borehole· Geotech Consultants ........ 84-99 I3T10 .81-03 ParKside at 95 Burnett I3'T1 81-99 CD c: .... ~ In ::; ~ ~ c: In VI o S ;:r and abandonment of a series Figure 11. Contour map of the surface of the gravels under the of channels that represent project. decreasing stream flow through time. The presence of an armor layer and the paleotopography of the basal gravel deposits suggests that these sediments represent bedload within a large channel that at one time carried most of the Cedar River flow off the fan into the Black River. A subsequent channel avulsion or change in channel planform is indicated by the transition to the well- stratified sand set that forms the fill of the former larger channel. The grain size of the sand and the kinds of primary structures represented within this set indicates these sediments were deposited mostly under low-flow conditions in turbulent shallow water (Reineck and Singh 1980). The multiple directions of flow further suggest that the channel was braided, or at least multi-threaded; the lack of widespread erosional contacts implies the channel rarely carried bankfull discharge. The upward transition to the more massive silty fine sand and sand-silt couplets suggests that the active channel had shifted some distance from the study area. The Northwest Archaeological ASSOCiates, Inc. CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION October 21,2004 NOT FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Parkside at Burnett increase in silt content coupled with the presence of sand-silt couplets indicate an overbank depositional environment in which floodwaters were trapped on the floodplain during waning flood stage, thereby allowing the finer-grained silt to settle out of suspension. 21 The flotsam, detrital charcoal, and other organic debris on the topographically high areas of the basal gravels suggests the surface of the gravels is also an intact buried surface with potential to contain archaeological materials. In particular, the leading edge of the sandy gravels where the slope breaks to the northwest and west is a likely place to harbor intact buried prehistoric archaeological materials. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS Backhoe trenching and subsurface shovel probing revealed that no intact cultural resources were present within the proposed Parkside at 95 Burnett project that would be affected by development of the project. In spite of the paucity of archaeological materials, the project setting and the similarity of the depositional sequence to that of nearby excavated archaeological sites suggest moderate potential for archaeological resources to be found during implementation of the project. Although no sites were found NWAA recommends that • A qualified archaeologist be retained to monitor subgrade excavations; • A Monitoring and Discovery Plan be drawn up that will establish procedures and agency contacts in the event of an inadvertent discovery during construction. There is always a possibility that undiscovered prehistoric or historic cultural resources may be inadvertently encountered during construction or other ground-disturbing activities. If prehistoric or historic cultural resources are observed in the project area during construction, work should be temporarily suspended at that location and a professional archaeologist should be retained to document and assess the discovery. The Washington Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (OAHP) and the affected Tribes should be contacted for any issues involving Native American sites. If project activities expose human remains, either in the form of burials or isolated bones or teeth, or other mortuary items, work in that area should be stopped and local law enforcement officials, the OAHP in Olympia, and the affected Tribes should be immediately contacted. In no case should additional excavation be undertaken until a protocol has been agreed upon by the above mentioned parties. No exposed human remains should be left unattended. Norlhwest Archaeological Associates, Inc. CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION October 21, 2004 NOT FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION I 22 Parlcside at 95 Burnett I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Northwest Archaeological Associates, Inc. October 21,2004 I CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION NOT FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I REFERENCES CITED Barnosky, Cathy W. 1985 Late Quaternary Vegetation Near Battle Ground Lake, Southern Puget Trough, Washington. Geological Society of America Bulletin 96:263-71. Barel, Feliks 2003 "Arboretum and Foster Island. Manuscript in possession of BOLA Architecture + Planning, Seattle, Washington. Beikman, Helen M., Howard D. Gower, and Toni A. Dana 1961 Coal Reserves of Washington. Bulletin 47, Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology. Olympia, Washington. Booth, Derek B., Kathy G. Troost, John J. Clague, and Richard B. Waitt 2003 The Cordilleran Ice Sheet. Development in Quaternary Science 1:17-43. Campbell, Sarah K. 1989 Postcolumbian Culture History in the Northern Columbia Plateau: A.D. 1500-1900. PhD. dissertation: University of Washington, Seattle. Carlson, Roy L. 1990 History of Research in Archaeology. In Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 7: Northwest Coast, edited by W. Suttles, pp. 107-115. Smithsonian Institution. Washington, D.C. Chatters, James C. 1981 Archaeology of the Sbabadid Site, 45KI51, King County, Washington. Prepared for CHG International. Office of Public Archaeology, Institute for Environmental Studies, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington. Chatters, James C., D. E. Rhode, and K. A. Hoover 1990 Tualdad Altu (45KI59): A Prehistoric Riverine Village in Southern Puget Sound. Archaeology in Washington 1 :23-48. Chrzastowski, Michael 1983 Historical Changes to Lake WaShington and Route of the Lake Washington Ship Canal, King County, Washington. U.S. Geological Survey. Washington, D.C. Crandell, Dwight R. and Robert D. Miller 1974 Quaternary Stratigraphy and Extent of Glaciation in the Mount Rainier Region, Washington. U. S. Geological Survey, Professional Paper 847. Washington D.C. Davis, Margaret B. 1973 Pollen Evidence of Changing Land Use Around the Shores of Lake Washington. Northwest Science 47: 133-48. Northwest Archaeological Associates, Inc. CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION 23 October 21,2004 NOT FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION 24 Parlcside at 95 Burnett Dragovich, Joe D., Patrick T. Pringle, and Timothy J. Walsh 1994 Extent and Geometry of the Mid-Holocene Osceola Mudflow in the Puget Lowland - Implications for Holocene Sedimentation and Paleogeography. Washington Geology 22:3-26. Easterbrook, Don J. 2003 Cordilleran Ice Sheet Glaciation of the Puget Lowland and Columbia Plateau and Alpine Glaciation of the North Cascade Range, Washington. In Western Cordillera and Adjacent Areas, edited by Terry W. Swanson, pp. 137-157. Geological Society of America. Boulder, Colorado. Evans, Stephen H. and Roy E. Jensen 1996 Geohydrologic Review of the Cedar River Ground-Water Basin. Washington Geology 24:3-13. Franklin, Jerry F. and C. T. Dymess 1973 Natural Vegetation of Oregon and Washington. Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Forest Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Washington D. C. Frenkel, R. E. and E. F. Heinitz 1987 Composition and Structure of Oregon Ash (Fraxinus Latifolia) Forest in William L. Finley National Wildlife Refuge, Oregon. Northwest Science 61 :203-12. Galster, Richard W. and William T. Laprade 1991 Geology of Seattle, Washington, United States of America. Bulletin of the Association of Engineering Geologists 28:239-302. Hodges, Charles M. 2004 Cultural Resources Assessment for the Salvation Army Food Bank Warehouse/Office Bui/ding, Renton, King County, Washington. Prepared for The Salvation Army, Northwest Division Headquarters, Seattle, Washington. Northwest Archaeological Associates, Inc., NWAA Report WA03-69. Seattle, Washington. Kaehler, Gretchen A., Stephanie E. Trudel, Dennis E. Lewarch, and Lynn L. Larson 2004 Data Recovery Excavations at the Henry Moses Aquatic Center Site (45KI686), Renton, King County, Washington. LAAS Technical Report #2003-09. Prepared for Community Services, City of Renton. Larson Anthropological Archaeological Services Limited, Gig Harbor, Washington. Kidd, Robert S. 1964 A SynthesiS of Western Washington Prehistory From the Perspective of Three Occupation Sites. Master's Thesis: University of Washington, Seattle. Kramer, Stephanie, Leonard A. Forsman, Lewarch Dennis E., and Lynn L. Larson 2001 Renton High School Archaeological Resources and Traditional Cultural Places Assessment, King County, Washington. LAAS Technical Report #2001-23. Prepared for Renton School District No. 403. Larson Anthropological Archaeological Services Limited, Gig Harbor, Washington. Northwest Archaeological Associates, Inc. CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION October 21,2004 NOT FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ParKside at Bumett 25 Kramer, Stephenie and Lynne L. Larson 2001 a Archaeological Consultation at South Grady and Wells Street Storm Drain Trench. Letter Report to the City of Renton. Larson Anthropological Archaeological Services, Gig Harbor, Washington. Kramer, Stephenie and Lynne L. Larson 2001 b Archaeological Monitoring of Backhoe Sample Points at the Renton High School Site (45-KI-501). Letter Report to Renton School District 403. Larson Anthropological Archaeological Services, Gig Harbor, Washington. Kruckeberg, Arthur R. 1991 The Natural History of Puget Sound Country. University of Washington Press, Seattle. Lange, Greg 1999 Seattle and Walla Walla Railroad runs first train on March 7, 1877. Web Page. Accessed September 25, 2004. http://www.historylink.org/_output.cfm?fileJd=755. Leopold, Estella B., Rudy Nickmann, John I. Hedges, and John R. Ertel 1982 Pollen and Lignin Records of Late Quaternary Vegetation, Lake Washington. Science 218: 1305-1307. Lewarch, Dennis E. 1994 Cultural Resources Field Assessment of the Fred Meyer Corporation Building Project Area, Renton, King County, Washington. Letter Report to Fred Meyer, Inc. Larson Anthropological Archaeological Services, Gig Harbor, Washington. Lewarch, Dennis E., Eric W. Bangs, and Lynn L. Larson 1996 Cultural Resources Assessment of the Schneider Homes Renton Apartments Project, Renton, King County, Washington. Letter Report to Schneider Homes, Inc. Larson Anthropological Archaeological Services, Gig Harbor, Washington. Lewarch, Dennis E., Gretchen A. Kaehler, and Lynn L. Larson 2003 Data Recovery Excavations at the Henry Moses Aquatic Center Site (45KI686), Washington State Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation Emergency Archaeological Excavation Permit No. 03-12. Prepared for City of Renton and Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation. Larson Anthropological Archaeological Services, Letter Report. Gig Harbor, Washington. Liesch, Bruce A., Charles E. Price, and Kenneth L. Walters 1963 Geology and Ground-Water Resources of Northwestern King County, Washington. Water Supply Bulletin 20. Division of Water Resources, Department of Conservation, Olympia, Washington. Matson, R. G. and G. C. Coupland 1995 The Prehistory of the Northwest Coast. Academic Press. San Diego, California. Meltzer, David J. and Robert C. Dunnell 1987 Fluted Point From the Pacific Northwest. Current Research in the Pleistocene 4: Northwest Archaeological Associates, Inc. CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION October 21, 2004 NOT FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION 26 Parkside at 95 Burnett Morgan, Vera E. (editor) 1999 The SR-101 Sequim Bypass Archaeological Project: Mid-to Late-Holocene Occupations on the Northern Olympic Peninsula, Clallam County, Washington. Prepared for Washington Department of Transportation. Archaeological and Historical Services, Eastern Washington University, Cheney, Eastem Washington University Reports in Archaeology and History 100-108. Mullineaux, Donal R. 1970 Geology of the Renton, Auburn, and Black Diamond Quadrangles, King County, Washington. U. S. Geological Survey, Professional Paper 672, Washington, D.C. Nelson, Charles N. 1990 Prehistory of the Puget Sound Region. In Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 7: The Northwest Coast, edited by W. Suttles, pp. 481-484. Smithsonian Institution. Washington, D. C. Perkins, Susan J. 2004 The Shrinking Cedar River -Channel Changes Following Flow Regulation and Bank Armoring. Web Page. Accessed 15 Aug 2004. http://geopacific.com/Perkins/cedtext1.htm . Porter, Stephen C. and Robert J. I. Carson 1971 Problems of Interpreting Radiocarbon Dates From Dead-Ice Terrain, with an Example from the Puget lowland of Washington. Quaternary Research 1:410-414. Porter, Stephen C. and Terry W. Swanson 1998 Radiocarbon Age Constraints on Rates of Advance and Retreat of the Puget lobe of the Cordilleran Ice Sheet During the last Glaciation. Quaternary Research 50:205-13. Reineck, Hans-Erich and Indra B. Singh 1980 Depositional Sedimentary Environments with Reference to Terrigenous Clastics. Springer-Verlag. Berlin. Robbins, Jeffrey R. and Amy E. Dugas 2000 Proposed Tolt River-John MacDonald Park Mariner Field Rehabilitation and New Soccer Field Construction Cultural Resource Assessment, Camation, King County. letter Report to Macleod Rekord landscape Architects, Compliance Archaeology, L.L.C.,. Seattle, Washington. Schalk, Randall F. 1988 The Evolution and Diversification of Native Land Use Systems on the Olympic Peninsula. Prepared for National Park Service. Institute for Environmental Studies, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington. Shong, Michael and Charles M. Hodges 2003 Results of the Cultural Resources Assessment for Renton Fitness (Fred Meyer Shopping Center) King County, Washington. letter Report to Chinn Construction Company, llC, Redmond, Washington. Northwest Archaeological Associates, Seattle. Northwest Archaeological Associates, Inc. CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION October 21, 2004 NOT FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Parkside at Bumett 27 Shong, Michael and Christian J. Miss 2002 Cultural Resources Investigations of the Proposed Hamilton Sand and Gravel Mine, Skagit County, Washington. Prepared for Centennial Resources, LLC. Northwest Archaeological Associates, Seattle. Slauson, Morda C. 1976 Renton -From Coal to Jets. Renton Historical Society. Renton, Washington. Stein, Alan J. 1999 Renton -Thumbnail History. Web Page. Accessed September 25, 2004. http://www.historylink.ora/ output.CFM?file ID=688. Thorson, Robert M. and Estella Leopold 2004 Shoreline Transgression and Crustal Motion at Lake Washington. USGS, Earthquake Hazards -External Research. Trudel, Stephanie E. and Lynn L. Larson 2003 Renton Retail Site, Archaeological Resources and Traditional Cultural Places Assessment, King County, Washington. LAAS Technical Report #2003-23. Prepared for Trace and Associates, Inc., Issaquah, Washington. Larson Anthropological Archaeological Services, Limited,. Gig Harbor, Washington. 2004 Archaeological Resources Monitoring at the Renton Retail Site. Letter Report to Trace and Associates, Issaquah, Washington. Larson Anthropological Archaeological Services, Limited, Gig Harbor, Washington. Tsukada, M. 1982 Pseudotsuga Menziesii (MIRB) Fanco: Its Pollen Dispersal and Late Quaternary History in the Pacific Northwest. Japanese Journal of Ecology 32: 159-187 32: 159-87. Whitlock, Cathy 1992 Vegetational and Climatic History of the Pacific Northwest During the Last 20,000 Years: Implications for Understanding Present-Day Biodiversity. Northwest Environmental Journal 8:5-28. Yount, J. C., J. P. Minard, and G. R. Dembroff 1993 Geologic Map of Surficial Deposits in the Seattle 30 x 60 Quadrangle. OFR 93-233. U. S. Geological Survey. Washington, D.C. Northwest Archaeological Associates, Inc. CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION October 21,2004 NOT FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION I 28 Parl<side at 95 Bumett I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Norlhwest Archaeological Associates, Inc. October 21,2004 I CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION NOT FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I APPENDIX A: Tribal Correspondence Northwest Archaeological Associates, Inc. CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION A-1 October 21, 2004 NOT FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 I' I Northwest Archaeological Associates, Inc. October 21,2004 I: CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION A-2 NOT FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION 1 I , "~, I ,'~ &jl < ..... NQrthwe.st",AfclraeuItlgiGal-As-sucrates~"-In~c7~"'-,I Cultural Resources Management Services 5418 20th Avenue NW, Suite 200, Seattle, WA 98107 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ..... , .~. September 9, 2004 The Honorable Cecile Hansen, Chair Duwamish Tribe 14235 Ambaum Blvd SW Burien, WA 98166-1464 RE "Parkside at 95 Burnett Avenue" Development Project Dear Chairwoman Hansen, Northwest Archaeological Associates, Inc. (NWAA) has been retained by TSA Architects, Inc., to conduct cultural resource studies for the proposed Parkside at 95 Burnett Avenue development. The proposed project is a commercial development with associated above-and below-ground parking areas located at 95 Burnett Ave South in Renton, King County, Washington (see attached map). The development site is currently an open lot measuring approximately 109 feet by 300 feet. The parcel is in a high-probability area for cultural resources. The area of the property formerly overlooked marsh or shoreline associated with Lake Washington, and the Cedar River channel is about 700 feet to the northeast. The former channel of the Black River (now under Lake Avenue S) is several hundred feet west of the proposed project area. Recorded sites in the vicinity include 45-KI-501 on the Renton High School grounds about 800 feet to the west. NWAA personnel will be conducting the field investigations during the next two weeks and I would like to know if the Tribe has any concerns regarding historic properties in or near the project that should be considered. We respect concerns about sharing sensitive information and we will work with you in a way that accommodates those concerns. At the conclusion of the fieldwork a draft cultural resources technical report will be prepared and made available for your review. This letter is a technical inquiry related to the identification of cultural resources for the SEPA permit review process, and does not constitute a policy-level request for consultation, which is the responsibility of the proponent and King County. Sincerely, ~ Charles M. Hodges Senior ArchaeologistlGeolaar<rc~letJ~rist--~ Tel: (206) 781-1909 Fax: (206) 781-0154 Email: cmhodges@northwestarch.com I 'I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I NE>rthwe.st/:Afffiaeof(jgie-al-AsSOCrateso;~Irrc:-:--'- Cultural Resources Management Services 5418 20th Avenue NW, Suite 200, Seattle, WA 98107 September 9, 2004 Ms. Donna Hogerhuis Cultural Resources Program Muckleshoot Indian Tribe 39015 172"d Avenue SE Auburn WA 98092-9763 RE "Parkside at 95 Burnett Avenue" Development Project Dear Ms. Hogerhuis, Northwest Archaeological Associates, Inc. (NWAA) has been retained by TSA Architects, Inc., to conduct cultural resource studies for the proposed Parkside at 95 Burnett Avenue development. The proposed project is a commercial development with associated above-and below-ground parking areas located at 95 Burnett Ave South in Renton, King County, Washington (see attached map). The development site is currently an open lot measuring approximately 109 feet by 300 feet. The parcel is in a high-probability area for cultural resources. The area of the property formerly overlooked marsh or shoreline associated with Lake Washington, and the Cedar River channel is about 700 feet to the northeast. The former channel of the Black River (now under Lake Avenue S) is several hundred feet west of the proposed project area. Recorded sites in the vicinity include 45-KI-501 on the Renton High School grounds about 800 feet to the west. NWAA personnel will be conducting the field investigations during the next two weeks and I would like to know if the Tribe has any concerns regarding historic properties in or near the project that should be considered. We respect concerns about sharing sensitive information and we will work with you in a way that accommodates those concerns. At the conclusion of the fieldwork a draft cultural resources technical report will be prepared and made available for your review. This letter is a technical inquiry related to the identification of cultural resources for the SEPA permit review process, and does not constitute a policy-level request for consultation, which is the responsibility of the proponent and King County. Sincerely, Charles M. Hodges seniO~~ cc Laura Murphy, Cultural Resources Archaeologist Tel: (206) 781-1909 Fax: (206) 781-0154 Email: cmhodges@northwestarch.com I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I GEOTECH CONSULTANTS~ INC. Colpitts Development Company, LLC 2256 -38th Place East Seattle, Washington 98112 Attention: David Nielsen 13256 Northeast 20th Street, Suite 16 Bellevue, Washington 98005 (425) 747-5618 FAX (425) 747-8561 September 29,2004 JN 03415 Subject: Transmittal Letter -Geotechnical engineering study Proposed Parkside at 95 Burnett Building 95 Burnett Avenue South Renton, Washington Dear Mr. Nielsen: We are pleased to present this geotechnical engineering report. for the proposed Parks ide at 95 Burnett building to be constructed in Renton. The scope of our services consisted of exploring site surface and subsurface conditions, and then developing this report to provide recommendations for general earthwork and design criteria for foundations, retaining walls, pavements, and temporary shoring. This work was authorized by your acceptance of our confirming proposal, JN 03415, dated October 9, 2003. The attached report contains a discussion of the study and our recommendations. Please contact us if there are any questions regarding this report, or for further assistance during the design and construction phases of this project. cc: TSA Architects.;... Kent Smutny via facsimile: (425) 401-0630 GDB/MRM: mjj Respectfully submitted, GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Gerry D. Bautista, Jr. Geotechnical Engineer DEVELOPMENT CITY OF RE~'1%NlNG OCT 2 6 2004 RECEIVED GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Proposed Parkside at 95 Burnett Building 95 Burnett Avenue South Renton. Washington This report presents the findings and recommendations of our geotechnical engineering study for the site of the proposed Parks ide at 95 Burnett building, to be located in Renton. We were provided with a preliminary set of architectural plans for the proposed development, Sheets A 1.0 through A6.1. TSA Architects prepared these plans, which are dated March 15, 2004. We were also provided with a topographic survey of the subject property that was performed prior to the existing buildings being demolished. Baseline Engineering prepared this survey, which is dated August 10, 2000. Based on these plans and conversations with Kent Smutny of TSA Architects, we understand that a new apartment building consisting of four stories of residential space overlying two levels of parking will be constructed on the property. The proposed building footprint will cover virtually the entire property, with proposed setbacks of 1.5 feet from the south property line, 2.5 feet from the west property line, and 7.5 feet from the north property line. Cuts of only approximately 5 feet are anticipated to reach the planned excavation bottom. We previously performed a geotechnical engineering study of the subject site for a different planned development, dated May 20, 1999. If the scope of the project changes from what we have described above, we should be provided with revised plans in order to determine if modifications to the recommendations and conclusions of this report are warranted. SITE CONDITIONS SURFACE The Vicinity Map, Plate 1, illustrates the general location of the site. The site is a relatively large, rectangular-shaped parcel situated on the northern portion of downtown Renton. It occupies approximately 340 feet of frontage along the eastern side of Burnett Avenue South. The relatively level site is currently vacant and covered with gravel parking and turnaround areas, and tall grass and brambles. At the time of explorations done for our geotechnical engineering study of the subject site in 1999, the majority of the site was covered with the Lande Feed Mill building, asphalt, or concrete. Existing development adjacent to the subject site is a combination of commercial and residential. An on-grade house and commercial garage border the site to the south. Some diagonal cracking was observed on the facing of the garage. The lot to the north of the subject site is undeveloped, and north of this lot is a four-story seniors' apartment building. Between the site and the adjacent north lot is a 15-foot sewer easement. A City of Renton park borders the site to the west. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Colpitts Development Company, L.LC September 29,2004 SUBSURFACE IN 03415 Page 2 The subsurface conditions were explored by drilling seven borings to supplement the four borings performed for our 1999 geotechnical engineering study. The approximate locations of these borings are shown on the Site Exploration Plan, Plate 2. Our exploration program was based on the proposed construction, anticipated subsurface conditions and those encountered during exploration, and the scope of work outlined in our proposal. The recent borings were drilled on October 14, 2003, using a trailer-mounted, hollow-stem auger drill. Samples were taken at 5-foot intervals with a standard penetration sampler. This split-spoon sampler, which has a 2-inch outside diameter, is driven into the soil with a 140-pound hammer falling 30 inches. The number of blows required to advance the sampler a given distance is an indication of the soil density or consistency. A geotechnical engineer from our staff observed the drilling process, logged the test borings, and obtained representative samples of the soil encountered. The Test BOring Logs are attached as Plates 3 through 9. The logs of the previous borings are included in the Appendix. Soil Conditions The seven recent borings encountered from 7 to approximately 25 feet of loose, sandy silt and silty sand directly underlying a thin layer of topsoil. These upper soils appear to be a combination of previously placed fill and alluvium (river deposits). Beneath these loose soils, the borings found medium-dense to very dense sand and gravelly sand. These dense to very dense soils were encountered to the maximum explored depth of the borings. Test boring depths ranged from 20 to 35 feet below existing grade. The soils encountered during our subsurface explorations are similar to the soils encountered during our explorations for our 1999 study of the subject site. As is evident from the boring logs, the thickness of loose soils was highly variable across the site. This is typical for sites in Renton, where old river channels meandered through' the area. No obstructions were revealed by our explorations. However, debris, buried utilities, and old foundation and slab elements are commonly encountered on sites that have had previous development. Groundwater Conditions Groundwater seepage was observed at a depth of 8 to 17 feet. The borings were left open for only a short time period. Therefore, the seepage levels on the logs represent the location of transient water seepage and may not indicate the static groundwater level. Groundwater levels encountered during drilling can be deceptive, because seepage into the boring can be blocked or slowed by the auger itself. It should be noted that groundwater levels vary seasonally with rainfall and other factors. Based on our observations, the regional water table found throughout downtown Renton was at a depth of 13 to 15 feet below the existing grade at the time of our borings. The final logs represent our interpretations of the field logs and laboratory tests. The stratification lines on the logs represent the approximate boundaries between soil types at the exploration locations. The actual transition between soil types may be gradual, and subsurface conditions can vary between exploration locations. The logs provide specific subsurface information only at the locations tested. If a transition in soil type occurred between samples in the borings, the depth of GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Colpitts Development Company, lJ-C September 29, 2004 IN 03415 Page 3 the transition was interpreted. The relative densities and moisture descriptions indicated on the boring logs are interpretive descriptions based on the conditions observed during drilling. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS GENERAL THIS SECTION CONTAINS A SUMMARY OF OUR STUDY AND FINDINGS FOR THE PURPOSES OF A GENERAL OVERVIEW ONLY. MORE SPECIFIC RECOMMENDA TlONS AND CONCLUSIONS ARE CONTAINED IN THE REMAINDER OF THIS REPORT. ANY PARTY REL YING ON THIS REPORT SHOULD READ THE ENTIRE DOCUMENT. The borings conducted for this study and our previous work encountered loose fill and alluvium overlying medium-dense to dense sands and gravelly sands. The loose soils are highly compressible and are potentially liquefiable below the water table. To prevent unacceptable foundation settlement under static building loads, and in the event of a moderate to large earthquake, we recommend that the proposed building be supported on deep foundations embedded into the dense, native soils. Due to the presence of potentially caving near-surface soils and groundwater, it appears that augercast piers are the most suitable deep foundation option. The plans show that the proposed building will be set back as close as 2.5 feet from the western property line. Cuts of up to 5 feet are anticipated to reach the planned excavation bottom along the western edge of the building. Allowing at least 2 feet of working space outside of the walls would require these cuts to be at the property line. We recommend that the existing soils may be cut back at a slope no steeper than 1.5:1 (Horizontal: Vertical). In order to make this excavation safely without using temporary shoring, the location of the building will need to be shifted to the east, or an easement will need to be obtained from the City of Renton to extend the necessary excavation on the park property. If neither of these options is possible, then we recommend using shoring to make the necessary excavation. Because of the relatively shallow proposed depth of excavation, shoring can likely consist of driven pipe piles and wood lagging. Shoring should also be used if cuts will extend below a 3:1 (Horizontal: Vertical) imaginary zone sloping downward from adjacent existing foundations. Ecology blocks could be used to share cuts of up to 5 feet away from existing structures and other settlement-sensitive elements. It is important to remember that the blocks take up 2 feet of space, and have to be battered backward an additional one foot. This will require more room than pipe pile shoring. All ecology blocks should be backfilled with quarry spalls or ballast rock, not on-site soils. Siabs-on-grade may also experience noticeable differential settlement relative to the foundations. If some settlement is allowable in the lowest parking floor, a slab-on-grade could be used. This slab should be reinforced with steel bars to limit the potential for excessive cracking when settlement occurs. Number 4 rebar at 18-inch centers placed both horizontal and vertical in the slab is typically sufficient. Wherever possible, the slab should be isolated from the pier-supported walls and columns. An exception to this is where interior and exterior slabs and walk lead up to doorways. At these locations, the slab's reinforcement should be tied in to the pier-supported foundation. This lessens the chance that a sharp downset (i.e., a trip hazard) will form at the door threshold. Areas of soft subgrade soils should be excavated beneath slabs and replaced with structural fill. The area around the site is underlain by soft compressible soils. Strong ground vibrations should be avoided to reduce the risk of causing settlement in surrounding on-grade elements. This GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Colpitts Development Company, I."LC September 29, 2004 IN 03415 Page 4 includes slabs, walkways, planters, and pavements. The general and earthwork contractors should be made aware of this concern. Large vibratory compactors, such as rollers or hoe-packs, should not be used at the site. Regardless of these measures, there is always a potential that neighbors will claim some settlement or damages as a result of new construction work. For this reason, we recommend the following: • Prior to construction, an extensive photographic and visual survey of the project vicinity should be completed. This documents the condition of buildings, pavements, and utilities in the immediate vicinity of the site in order to protect you from unsubstantiated claims by surrounding property owners. • Adjacent on-grade elements and foundation should be monitored during construction to detect soil movements. To monitor their performance, we recommend establishing a series of survey reference points to measure any vertical deflections. The accuracy of this monitoring is typically 1/8-inch. The benchmarks should be monitored at least once a week, until the excavation and pile installation are completed and it is determined that no settlement is occurring. We can provide recommendations for this monitoring if it becomes necessary. The on-site soils are silty, and thus are moisture-sensitive. To prevent disturbance to the excavation bottom during periods of wet weather, we recommend that the bottom-of-excavation be protected with a mat of crushed rock. The excavated on-site soils will generally not be reusable as structural fill or wall backfill, due to their high silt content. We anticipate that all structural fill will need to be imported for this project. The drainage and/or waterproofing recommendations presented in this report are intended only to prevent active seepage from flowing through concrete walls or slabs. Even in the absence of active seepage into and beneath structures, water vapor can migrate through walls, slabs, and floors from the surrounding soil, and can even be transmitted from slabs and foundation walls due to the concrete curing process. Water vapor also results from occupant uses, such as cooking and bathing. Excessive water vapor trapped within structures can result in a variety of undesirable conditions, including, but not limited to, moisture problems with flooring systems, excessively moist air within occupied areas, and the growth of molds, fungi, and other biological organisms that may be harmful to the health of the occupants. The designer or architect must consider the potential vapor sources and likely occupant uses, and provide sufficient ventilation, either passive or mechanical, to prevent a build up of excessive water vapor within the planned structure. Geotech Consultants, Inc. should be allowed to review the final development plans to verify that the recommendations presented in this report are adequately addressed in the design. Such a plan review would be additional work beyond the current scope of work for this study, and it may include revisions to our recommendations to accommodate site, development, and geotechnical constraints that become more evident during the review process. We recommend including this report, in its entirety, in the project contract documents. This report should also be provided to any future property owners so they will be aware of our findings and recommendations. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS. INC. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Colpitts Development Company, LLC September 29, 2004 SEISMIC CONSIDERA TIONS IN 03415 Page 5 The site is located within Seismic Zone 3, as illustrated on Figure No. 16-2 of the 1997 Uniform Building Code (UBC). In accordance with Table 16-J of the 1997 UBC, the site soil profile within 100 feet of the ground surface is best represented by Soil Profile Type So (Stiff Soil). Under the 2003 International Building Code (IBC) the Site Class would be D. The loose soils beneath the water table are potentially susceptible to seismic liquefaction during a moderate to large earthquake. The use of deep foundations to support the building should mitigate the risk of catastrophic foundation settlement that could result from seismic liquefaction. AUGERCAST CONCRETE PIERS Augercast piers are installed using continuous flight, hollow-stem auger equipment mounted on a crane. Concrete grout must be pumped continuously through the auger as it is withdrawn. This allows the piers to be installed where caving conditions or significant groundwater are anticipated. We recommend that augercast piers be installed by an experienced contractor who is familiar with the anticipated subsurface conditions. An allowable compressive capacity of 50 tons can be attained by installing a 16-inch-diameter, augercast concrete pier at least 10 feet into dense, native soils. For transient loading, such as wind or seismic loads, the allowable pier capacity may be increased by one-third. We can provide de- sign criteria for different pier diameters and embedment lengths, if greater capacities are required. The minimum center-to-center pier spacing should be three times the pier diameter. Based on our test boring information, we estimate that pier lengths of about 30 to 40 feet below existing grade will be required to ~chieve adequate penetration into the bearing soil. We estimate that the total settlement of single piers installed as described above will be on the or- der of one-half inch. Most of this settlement should occur during the construction phase as the dead loads are applied. The remaining post-construction settlement would be realized as the live loads are applied. We estimate that differential settlements over any portion of the structure should be less than about one-quarter inch. We recommend reinforcing each pier its entire length. This typically consists of a rebar cage extending a portion of the pier's length with a full-length center bar. Each pier can be assumed to have a point of fixity (point of maximum bending moment) at 12 feet below the top of the pier for design of the reinforcing. The loose soil against the piers can be assumed to have a design passive earth resistance of 200 pounds per cubic foot (pct) acting on two times the pier diameter. Passive earth pressures on the grade beams will also provide some lateral resistance. If structural fill is placed against the outside of the grade beams, the design passive earth pressure from the fill can be assumed to be equal to that pressure exerted by an equivalent fluid with a density of 200 pcf. These passive earth resistance values include a safety factor of 1.5. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Colpitts Development Company, L,LC September 29, 2004 PERMANENT FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS IN 03415 Page 6 Retaining walls backfilled on only one side should be designed to resist the lateral earth pressures imposed by the soil they retain. The following recommended parameters are for walls that restrain level backfill: Active Earth Pressure * 40 pct Soil Unit Weight 130 pct Where: (I) pcf Is pounds per cubic foot, and (II) active and passive earth pressures are computed using the equivalent fluid pressures. * For a restrained wall that cannot deflect at least 0.002 times its height, a uniform lateral pressure equal to 10 psf times the height of the wall should be added to the above active equivalent fluid pressure. The values given above are to be used to design permanent foundation and retaining walls only. The values for friction and passive resistance are ultimate values and do not include a safety factor. We recommend a safety factor of at least 1.5 for overturning and sliding, when using the above values to design the walls. The design values given above do not include the effects of any hydrostatic pressures behind the walls and assume that no surcharges, such as those caused by slopes, vehicles, or adjacent foundations will be exerted on the walls. If these conditions exist, those pressures should be added to the above lateral soil pressures. Where sloping backfill is desired behind the walls, we will need to be given the wall dimensions and the slope of the backfill in order to provide the appropriate design earth pressures. The surcharge due to traffic loads behind a wall can typically be accounted for by adding a uniform pressure equal to 2 feet multiplied by the above active fluid density. Heavy construction equipment should not be operated behind retaining and foundation walls within a distance equal to the height of a wall, unless the walls are designed for the additional lateral pressures resulting from the equipment. The wall design criteria assume that the backfill will be well compacted in lifts no thicker than 12 inches. The compaction of backfill near the walls should be accomplished with hand-operated equipment to prevent the walls from being overloaded by the higher soil forces that occur during compaction. Retaining Wall Backfill Backfill placed behind retaining or foundation walls should be coarse, free-draining structural fill containing no organics. This backfill should contain no more than 5 percent silt or clay particles and have no gravel greater than 4 inches in diameter. The percentage of particles passing the No. 4 sieve should be between 25 and 70 percent. The uppermost soils are generally not free draining. The later section entitled Drainage Considerations should also be reviewed for recommendations related to subsurface drainage behind foundation and retaining walls. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Colpitts Development Company, LLC September 29,2004 IN 03415 Page 7 The purpose of these backfill requirements is to ensure that the design criteria for a retaining wall are not exceeded because of a build-up of hydrostatic pressure behind the wall. The top 12 to 18 inches of the backfill should consist of a compacted, relatively impermeable soil or topsoil, or the surface should be paved. The ground surface must also slope away from backfilled walls to reduce the potential for surface water to percolate into the backfill. The section entitled General Earthwork and Structural Fill contains recommendations regarding the placement and compaction of structural fill behind retaining and foundation walls. The above recommendations are not intended to waterproof below-grade walls, or to prevent the formation of mold, mildew or fungi in interior spaces. Over time, the performance of subsurface drainage systems can degrade, subsurface groundwater flow patterns can change, and utilities can break or develop leaks. Therefore, waterproofing should be provided where future seepage through the walls is not acceptable. This typically includes limiting cold-joints and wall penetrations, and using bentonite panels or membranes on the outside of the walls. There are a variety of different waterproofing materials and systems, which should be installed by an experienced contractor familiar with the anticipated construction and subsurface conditions. Applying a thin coat of asphalt emulsion to the outside face of a wall is not considered waterproofing, and will only help to reduce moisture generated from water vapor or capillary action from seeping through the concrete. As with any project, adequate ventilation of basement and crawl space areas is important to prevent a build up of water vapor that is commonly transmitted through concrete walls from the surrounding soil, even when seepage is not present. This is appropriate even when waterproofing is applied to the outside of foundation and retaining walls. We recommend that you contact a specialty consultant if detailed recommendations or specifications related to waterproofing design, or minimizing the potential for infestations of mold and mildew are desired. The General, Siabs-On-Grade, and Drainage Considerations sections should be reviewed for additional recommendations related to the control of groundwater and excess water vapor for the antiCipated construction. SLABS-ON-GRADE The General section should be reviewed for slab support considerations. All slabs-on-grade should be underlain by a capillary break or drainage layer consisting of a minimum 4-inch thickness of coarse, free-draining structural fill with a gradation similar to that discussed in Permanent Foundation and Retaining Walls. This capillary break/drainage layer is not necessary if an underslab drainage system is installed. As noted by the American Concrete Institute (ACI) in the Guides for Concrete Floor and Slab Structures, proper moisture protection is desirable immediately below anyon-grade slab that will be covered by tile, wood, carpet, impermeable floor coverings, or any moisture-sensitive equipment or products. ACt also notes that vapor retarders, such as 6-mil plastic sheeting, are typically used. A vapor retarder is defined as a material with a permeance of less than 0.3 US perms per square foot (pst) per hour, as determined by ASTM E 96. It is possible that concrete admixtures may meet this specification, although the manufacturers of the admixtures should be consulted. Where plastic sheeting is used under slabs, joints should overlap by at least 6 inches and be sealed with adhesive tape. The sheeting should extend to the foundation walls for maximum vapor protection. If no potential for vapor passage through the slab is desired, a vapor barrier should be used. A vapor barrier, as defined by ACI, is a product with a water transmission GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Colpitts Development Company, L.LC September 29, 2004 IN 03415 Page 8 rate of 0.00 perms per square foot per hour when tested in accordance with ASTM E 96. Reinforced membranes having sealed overlaps can meet this requirement. In the recent past, ACI (Section 4.1.5) recommended that a minimum of 4 inches of well-graded compactable granular material, such as a 5/8 inch minus crushed rock pavement base, should be placed over the vapor retarder or barrier for protection of the retarder or barrier and as a "blotter" to aid in the curing of the concrete slab. Sand was not recommended by ACI for this purpose. However, the use of material over the vapor retarder is controversial as noted in current ACI literature because of the potential that the protection/blotter material can become wet between the time of its placement and the installation of the slab. If the material is wet prior to slab placement, which is always possible in the Puget Sound area, it could cause vapor transmission to occur up through the slab in the future, essentially destroying the purpose of the vapor barrierlretarder. Therefore, if there is a potential that the protection/blotter material will become wet before the slab is installed, ACI now recommends that no protection/blotter material be used. However, ACI then recommends that, because there is a potential for slab cure due to the loss of the blotter material, joint spacing in the slab be reduced, a low shrinkage concrete mixture be used, and "other measures" (steel reinforcing, etc.) be used. ASTM E-1643-98 "Standard Practice for Installation of Water Vapor Retarders Used in Contact with Earth or Granular Fill Under Concrete Slabs" generally agrees with the recent ACI literature. We recommend that the contractor, the project materials engineer, and the owner discuss these issues and review recent ACI literature and ASTM E-1643 for installation guidelines and guidance on the use of the protection/blotter material. Our opinion is that with impervious surfaces that all means should be undertaken to reduce water vapor transmission. EXCAVATIONS AND SLOPES Excavation slopes should not exceed the limits specified in local, state, and national government safety regulations. Temporary cuts to a depth of about 4 feet may be attempted vertically in unsaturated soil, if there are no indications of slope instability. However, vertical cuts should not be made near property boundaries, or existing utilities and structures. Based upon Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 296, Part N, the soil at the subject site would generally be classified as Type C. Therefore, temporary cut slopes greater than 4 feet in height cannot be excavated at an inclination steeper than 1.5:1 (Horizontal:Vertical), extending continuously between the top and the bottom of a cut. The above-recommended temporary slope inclination is based on what has been successful at other sites with similar soil conditions. Temporary cuts are those that will remain unsupported for a relatively short duration to allow for the construction of foundations, retaining walls, or utilities. Temporary cut slopes should be protected with plastic sheeting during wet weather. The cut slopes should also be backfilled or retained as soon as possible to reduce the potential for instability. Please note that loose soil can cave suddenly and without warning. Excavation, foundation, and utility contractors should be made especially aware of this potential danger. All permanent cuts into native soil should be inclined no steeper than 2:1 (H:V). Water should not be allowed to flow uncontrolled over the top of any temporary or permanent slope. All permanently exposed slopes should be seeded with an appropriate species of vegetation to reduce erosion and improve the stability of the surficial layer of soil. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Colpitts Development Company, '-tLC September 29, 2004 DRAINAGE CONSIDERA TlONS IN 03415 Page 9 We recommend that foundation drains be installed at the base of all foundation and earth-retaining walls. These drains should consist of 4-inch, perforated PVC pipe surrounded by at least 6 inches of 1-inch-minus, washed rock wrapped in a non-woven, geotextile filter fabric (Mirafi 140N, Supac 4NP, or similar material). At its highest point, a perforated pipe invert should be at least as low as the bottom of the footing, and it should be sloped for drainage. All roof and surface water drains must be kept separate from the foundation drain system. A typical drain detail is attached to this report as Plate 12. For the best long-term performance, perforated PVC pipe is recommended for all subsurface drains. If the structure includes an elevator, it may be necessary to provide special drainage or waterproofing measures for the elevator pit. If no seepage into the elevator pit is acceptable, it will be necessary to provide a footing drain and free-draining wall backfill, and the walls should be waterproofed. If the footing drain will be too low to connect to the storm drainage system, then it will likely be necessary to install a pumped sump to discharge the collected water. Alternatively, the elevator pit could be designed to be entirely waterproof; this would include designing the pit structure to resist hydrostatiC uplift pressures. Drainage inside the building's footprint should also be provided if the excavation encounters significant seepage. We can provide recommendations for interior drains, should they become necessary, during excavation and foundation construction. As a minimum, a vapor retarder, as defined in the Siabs-On-Grade section, should be provided in any crawl space area to limit the transmission of water vapor from the underlying soils. Also, an outlet drain is recommended for all crawl spaces to prevent a build up of any water that may bypass the footing drains. Groundwater was observed during our fieldwork. If seepage is encountered in an excavation, it should be drained from the site by directing it through drainage ditches, perforated pipe, or French drains, or by pumping it from sumps interconnected by shallow connector trenches at the bottom of the excavation. The excavation and site should be graded so that surface water is directed off the site and away from the tops of slopes. Water should not be allowed to stand in any area where foundations, slabs, or pavements are to be constructed. Final site grading in areas adjacent to a building should slope away at least 2 percent, except where the area is paved. Surface drains should be provided where necessary to prevent ponding of water behind foundation or retaining walls. GENERAL EARTHWORK AND STRUCTURAL FILL All building and pavement areas should be stripped of surface vegetation, topsoil, organic soil, and other deleterious material. The stripped or removed materials should not be mixed with any materials to be used as structural fill, but they could be used in non-structural areas, such as landscape beds. Structural fill is defined as any fill, including utility backfill, placed under, or close to, a building, behind permanent retaining or foundation walls,· or in other areas where the underlying soil needs to support loads. All structural fill should be placed in horizontal lifts with a moisture content at, or GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Colpitts Development Company, L..LC September 29,2004 IN 03415 Page 10 near, the optimum moisture content. The optimum moisture content is that moisture content that results in the greatest compacted dry density. The moisture content of fill is very important and must be closely controlled during the filling and compaction process. As discussed in the General section, the on-site soils are not suitable for reuse as structural fill, due to their high moisture and silt contents. The allowable thickness of the fill lift will depend on the material type selected, the compaction equipment used, and the number of passes made to compact the lift. The loose lift thickness should not exceed 12 inches. We recommend testing the fill as it is placed. If the fill is not sufficiently compacted, it can be recompacted before another lift is placed. This eliminates the need to remove the fill to achieve the required compaction. The following table presents recommended relative compactions for structural fill: Beneath pavements 90% 95% for upper 12 inches of subgrade; 90% below that level Where: Minimum Relative Compaction is the ratio, expressed In percentages, of the compacted dry density to the maximum dry density, as detennlned in accordance with ASTM Test Designation D 1557-91 (Modified Proctor). Structural fill that will be placed in wet weather should consist of a coarse granular soil with a silt or clay content of no more than 5 percent. The percentage of particles passing the No. 200 sieve should be measured from that portion of soil passing the three-quarter-inch sieve. LIMITATIONS The conclusions and recommendations contained in this report are based on site conditions as they existed at the time of our exploration and assume that the soil and groundwater conditions encountered in the borings are representative of subsurface conditions on the site. If the subsurface conditions encountered during construction are significantly different from those observed in our explorations, we should be advised at once so that we can review these conditions and reconsider our recommendations where necessary. Unanticipated soil conditions are commonly encountered on construction sites and cannot be fully anticipated by merely taking soil samples in borings. Subsurface conditions can also vary between exploration locations. Such unexpected conditions frequently require making additional expenditures to attain a properly constructed project. It is recommended that the owner consider providing a contingency fund to accommodate such potential extra costs and risks. This is a standard recommendation for all projects. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Colpitts Development Company, LLC, and its representatives, for specific application to this project and site. Our recommendations and conclusions are based on observed site materials and selective laboratory testing. Our conclusions and recommendations are professional opinions derived in accordance with current standards of GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Colpitts Development Company, L,LC September 29,2004 IN 03415 Page 11 practice within the scope of our services and within budget and time constraints. No warranty is expressed or implied. The scope of our services does not include services related to construction safety precautions, and our recommendations are not intended to direct the contractor's methods, techniques, sequences, or procedures, except as specifically described in our report for consideration in design. Our services also do not include assessing or minimizing the potential for biological hazards, such as mold, bacteria, mildew and fungi in either the existing or proposed site . development. ADDITIONAL SERVICES Geotech Consultants, Inc. should be retained to provide geotechnical consultation, testing, and observation services during construction. This is to confirm that subsurface conditions are consistent with those indicated by our exploration, to evaluate whether earthwork and foundation construction activities comply with the general intent of the recommendations presented in this report, and to provide suggestions for design changes in the event subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated prior to the start of construction. However, our work would not include the supervision or direction of the actual work of the contractor and its employees or agents. Also, job and site safety, and dimensional measurements, will be the responsibility of the contractor. During the construction phase, we will provide geotechnical observation and testing services only when requested by you or your representatives. We can only document site work that we actually observe. It is still the responsibility of your contractor or on-site construction team to verify that our recommendations are being followed, whether we are present at the site or not. The following plates are attached to complete this report: Plate 1 Vicinity Map Plate 2 Site Exploration Plan Plates 3 - 9 Boring Logs Plates 10-11 Grain Size Analyses Plate 12 Typical Footing Drain Detail Appendix Boring Logs from 1999 Study GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Colpitts Development Company, L..LC September 29, 2004 IN 03415 Page 12 We appreciate the·opportunity to be of service on this project. If you have any questions, or if we may be of further service, please do not hesitate to contact us. GDB/MRM: mjj Respectfully submitted, GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Gerry D. Bautista, Jr. Geotechnical Engineer lO/25I°¥ Marc R. McGinnis, P.E. Principal GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I , -t I " >-W ....J ~ ; .. t. (lUUIt/VIR '''''1 z; 20 (Source: Thomas Brothers Street Guide and Directory) GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. VICINITY MAP 77 & 95 Burnett Avenue South Renton, Washington Job No: 03415 Date: Plate: Sept 2004 Not To Scale NORTH I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i GI c: i ! !.' I'!l I I ~ I 8-1 LEGEND: • Boring Location and Year 2003 I I ~I ----~- .']..c;r::G I (Source: Site Plan from TSA Architects) I ~~ GEOTECH SITE EXPLORATION PLAN 77 & 95 Burnett Avenue South I "L~ ~t..~~~~====~~ I Job No: I Date: I I Plate: ...., ~ y= _ 03415 Sept.2004 Not To Scale 2 I~====~====~======~==~ Renton, Washington CONSULTANTS, INC. I I I I , I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I BORING 1 -2003 Description Grass over Orange-brown, slighUy sandy SilT, low plasticity, very moist, soft Brown, gravelly SAND, fine-to medium-grained, moist, medium-dense -becomes gray, very moist to wet Gray, sandy SilT, with lenses of black, fibrous peat, non-plastic, wet, loose Brown to gray SAND, fine-grained, wet, loose to medium-dense -becomes gravelly, fine-to coarse-grained, wet, very dense * Test boring was terminated at 30 feet during drilling on October 14, 2003. * Groundwater seepage was encountered at 13.5 feet during drilling. ~...... GEOTECH . .., CONSULTANTS, INC. ~~~~~~~~~~==---- BORING LOG 77 & 95 Burnett Avenue South Renton, Washington IJObNO: 03415 I Date: I Logged by: I Plate: Sepl 2004 GOB 3 I I I I , I I I I I I I I I I I !I. BORING 2 -2003 >$;< ~C:J ~rF ~ , ~~~\.fb~O l' ~ #~ Description Grass over Orange-brown, sandy SilT, low plasticity, moist, soft 5 24 -becomes brown, non-plastic, wet, medium-dense Gray, gravelly SAND, fine-to coarse-grained, very moist, medium-dense 28 44 -becomes wet, dense 47 * Test boring was terminated at 25 feet during drilling on October 14, 2003. * Groundwater seepage was encountered at 8 feet and 18 feet during drilling. I ~...... GEOTECH .-, CONSULTANTS, INC. BORING LOG 77 & 95 Burnett Avenue South Renton, Washington i..l"1-~.~~~~~ I --= • -IJOb No: I Date: I Logged by: I Plate: L-~===========~=====Y==================~~.==O=34=1=5===_===Se==~=2=~==_~====G=D=B=_=====4==~-1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ ~ ~ ~ 5 ~28.B% ~ ~ ~ ~ 10 ~ ~ -. ~ 15 ~=3.1% ----- 20 ----- 25 -~ ~ ~ ~ 30 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 35 I-- ~ ~ ~ t- 40 ..... e~ #' ~cf''' e BORING 3 -2003 4~#e~o I' t;~ .sft; Description .Y. Grass over Orange-brown, sandy SILT, low plasticity, very moist, loose Brown, gravelly SAND, fine-to coarse-grained, moist, medium-dense 17 50 -becomes wet. dense to very dense 48 4 I ~ll'I:@lllll ~~~---------------------------------------------- * Test boring was terminated at 20 feet during drilling on October 14, 2003. * Groundwater seepage was encountered at 13 feet during drilling. I ~.... GEOTECH . ., CONSULTANTS, INC. BORING LOG 77 & 95 Burnett Avenue South Renton, Washington II L-~=======~=~~=~=t~~=;;;;'~~;;;;;;;;;;;;;==~~IJ=O=~=~=O=~5===I~Da==~=:=e=2=rnw==I=L=og=ged===~=~='B=I=A=~=~=:=5==~~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 8 4 8 11 1% 28 55 Grass over Orange-gray, sandy SilT, non-plastic, moist, loose Gray silty SAND/sandy SilT, fine-grained, very moist to wet, loose Gray SAND, fine-to coarse-grained, very moist to wet, loose -becomes fine-grained, wet, medium-dense -becomes gravelly, medium-to coarse-grained, wet, medium-dense -log * Test boring was terminated at 35 feet during drilling on October 14, 2003. * Groundwater seepage was encountered at 17 feet during drilling. ~. ~ GEOTECH . ., CONSULTANTS, INC. BORING LOG 77 & 95 Burnett Avenue South Renton, Washington ~~~~~~~~~~~----'JObNO: 03415 I Date: I Logged by: I Plate: Sept 2004 GOB 6 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Grass over Orange-gray, sandy SILT, non-plastic to low plasticity, very moist, loose ML 5 Brown, gravelly SAND, fine-to medium-grained, moist, medium-dense 15 43 -becomes dense Gray SAND, fine-grained, wet, loose 9 Brown, gravelly SAND, medium-to coarse-grained, wet, medium-dense 28 77 -becomes very dense * Test boring was terminated at 30 feet during drilling on October 14, 2003. * Groundwater seepage was encountered at 17 feet during drilling. ~.... GEOTECH . ., CONSULTANTS, INC. ,~.~~ yo "y=== BORING LOG 77 & 95 Burnett Avenue South Renton, Washington IJObNO: 03415 I Date: I Logged by: I Plate: Sept 2004 GOB 7 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I BORING 6 -2003 Description Gray, gravelly SAND, fine-to medium-grained, moist,loose (FILL) Orange-gray, sandy SILT, non-plastic to low plasticity, very moist. soft Orange-brown SAND, fine-grained, moist, loose -becomes brown, gravelly, very moist to wet, medium-dense -becomes gray, gravelly, wet -becomes brown, dense * Test boring was terminated at 25 feet during drilling on October 14, 2003. * Groundwater seepage was encountered at 13 feet during drilling. ~...... GEOTECH . .., CONSULTANTS, INC. ~~~l~~~y=~~~~~~-- BORING LOG 77 & 95 Burnett Avenue South Renton, Washington IJObNO: 03415 I Date: I Logged by: I Plate: Sept 2004 GOB I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I BORING 7 -2003 Description Grass Orange-gray, sandy SILT, low plasticity, very moist, soft Brown, gravelly SAND, fine-to coarse-grained, moist, medium-dense -becomes gray (blows overstated due to gravel) -becomes brown, wet, medium-dense -becomes very dense * Test bOring was terminated at 25 feet during drilling on October 14, 2003. * Groundwater seepage was encountered at 17 feet during drilling. ~.... GEOTECH .-, CONSULTANTS, INC. )~ .. ~~~~--y y::== BORING LOG 77 & 95 Burnett Avenue South Renton, Washington IJObNO: 03415 I Date: I Logged by: I Plate: Sept. 2004 GOB 9 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0 0 0 0 I ", i ; ! ! ! i ! i i 1 j ! ! i ! ! I ! i ~ ~ , ~iI ~ p , SIeve OpenIng (mm.) p ~ 0 0 0 0 :.. ~ 0 0 0 100 ~ ................ , ", .~ ·90 """ "-SO "\ f\. .. 1\ 70 \i' ~ SO ." \ .... ~0 a 1\ co &l ;a \ ~ ." II 1,\ .. .. co .... 40 Co " .... "-. '. r"r-.... 3) "'...." .... 't ~ ")I .... ~\ 20 r', l"- i'-.. '''-10 '- 0 ~ '" 1 !' 1 * ~ OJ 0 0 0 0 0 0 SIeve OpenIng (US standard) I __ B-1, 2lf, m=19.1'16 --8-2, 13',m=3.1'" -.... -B4, Z3', m=13.1'16 I GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS GEOTECH 77 & 95 Burnett Avenue South CONSULTANTS, INC. Renton, Washington ,.. I Job No: , Date: I I Plate: I y < y= ~ Sept. 2004 ~ 10 03415 , a a o a Z Y Sieve Opening (mm.) a o o a a Sieve Opening (US standard) __ 8-5.211'. m=8.7'!I. __ B-6.18'.m=11~ GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. --6 -B-7. 23'. m=5.5'1!. GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS 77 & 95 Burnett Avenue South Renton, Washington Slope backfill away from foundation. Provide surface drains where necessary. Backfill (See text for requirements) Tightline Roof Drain (Do not connect to footing drain) Vapor Retarder 6" min. NOTES: \.---4" Perforated Hard PVC Pipe (Invert at least 6 inches below slab or crawl space. Slope to drain to appropriate outfall. Place holes downward.) or Barrier Free-Draining Gravel (if appropriate) (1) In crawl spaces, provide an outlet drain to prevent buildup of water that bypasses the perimeter footing drains. (2) Refer to report text for additional drainage and waterproofing considerations. ~.. GEOTECH -------')ff'-CONSULTANTS, INC. ~~~tz~~'S>-~~~~ FOOTING DRAIN DETAIL 77 & 95 Burnett Avenue South Renton, Washington Date: Plate: Sept. 2004 12 I I I I I Test Boring Logs from Previous Study I 95 Burnett Avenue South I Renton, Washington I I I I I I I I I I I I GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. I : !- 120 :- !- I : 2S~ I ~ l- I-130 1- l- I- I ~ 35- I : I- 140 ::.. 2 4 13 23 20 11 21 41 BORING 1 Description FI LL Asphalt over brown SAND with fine gravel, moist, loose (FILL) 11~ Uill ;: ML Brown to gray, sandy SILT, moist, soft 2H ~~~----------------------------------------------31~ f.!sp " Brown SAND, slightly oxidized, with trace of silt, fine-to medium-grained, , moist, medium dense -becomes more sandy " Brown, gravelly, SAND, fine-to coarse-grained, wet, medium dense . sw; 51 "'T:"; -becomes more gravelly m lill 6 m ML Grayish-brown SILT with fine sand, wet, stiff fiT ~:::;:;,~~~~t~ 71 ~,;:~ =~;,!!,<;"RAVEL with sand, fine-to coarse-grained, wet, 8I'l~:'~';r}~: -becomes dense * Test boring was terminated at 29 feet during drilling on April 23, 1999. * Groundwater seepage was encountered.. during drilling at 10 feet ~... GEOTECH . ., CONSULTANTS, INC. BORING LOG 95 Burnett Avenue South Renton, Washington )~~~~~#~~~~~ I VObNO: 99132 I Date: May 1999 3 I I I ~5 ~ 10 ~ ~ 15 40 , ~iI ~ FILL 4 1 23 2 BORING 2 Description 2" asphalt over 6" concrete over brown, silty SAND with some gravel, damp, loose (FILL) Brown SILT with sand and gravel, moist, soft Brown, sandy GRAVEL to gravelly SAND, moist, dense No sample Brown, sandy GRAVEL with trace of silt, fine-to coarse-grained, moist, 58 3 ~·==~~~d~e~n~s~e ______________________________________ ___ * Test boring was terminated at 16.5 feet during drilling on April 23, 1999. * No groundwater seepage was encountered during drilling. BORING LOG GEOTECH 95 Burnett Avenue South CONSULTANTS, INC. Renton, Washington ~y= I Job No: 99132 I Date: May 1999 ILogge11r: I Plate: 4 OJ'!" 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 I - l- I----------- ~ ~ l- I- ~ ~ I-- l- I-... ... !------------ l- I- ~ I--- BORING 3 Description Brown organic topsoil over 4 11 ~ Brown, silty SAND, fine-grained, trace of organics, moist, loose 2 2~ !!: .-...;. . 8M Brownish gray with orange mottling, SILT with sand, very moist, soft Gray, silty SAND, fine-grained, wet, very loose 5 31::'! -becomes less silty ~~4-------------------------------------------------10 41 ~ Gray, sandy SILT with organic layers, occasional gravel, wet, stiff I"T Brown SAND with trace of silt, fine-to medium-grained, wet, loose m"hhl.;'HFII -becomes gray 5 sif W Gray, sandy SILT with thin organic layers, wet, loose ML -becomes hard SOlS" 7 mm:·l E:::::(v Gray, s~ndy GRAVEL with trace of silt, wet, very dense * Test boring was terminated at 26 feet during drilling on April 23, 1999. * Groundwater seepage was encountered at 6 feet during drilling. --tAt GEOTECH 'I' CONSULTANTS, INC. BORING LOG 95 Burnett Avenue South Renton, Washington )~~b~~r="~~~~ VObNO: 99132 I Date-May i999 5 I ~~ ) I BORING 4 Description Brown, fine sand (Top Soil) over FILL brown to orange, silty SAND with gravel, moist, loose (FILL) Brown SILT to silty SAND, with some gravel, moist, loose 3 1 -becomes gravelly 31 2 Brown, gravelly SAND, medium-to coarse-grained, moist, dense ..... .,...... * Test boring was terminated at 12 feet during drilling on April 23, 1999. * No groundwater seepage was encountered during drilling. BORING LOG GEOTECH 95 Burnett Avenue South CONSULTANTS, INC. Renton, Washington '5= I Job No: 99132 I Date: May 1999 I Logge4Jv: I Plate: 6 ..... " ;.: ..: " ~' " " ,!. , ,.' ,.',:.: '., , ~ . '/' <', ,', , :' ~ '. :1" , ,", :; !. ; "", .:" .t' • ,I , > ,': ... : .~ , . ", ,',\\ . .... '.' " . '. , '1." ,:., . ~. ,.;: . ., :·r " ',' "';',, .. ~ , • l : -",~. I -;;. , .. ' , ',' , t· . '1 '. " '.: ' ",'1 :1"·,···· . ". , f" ~ , .• ,'r'" , ,', ".," ,I··.· . .. .... " ,~ .. , , , . ' . ;'f( "1, -!C. ~;' I"·~ . " ~ ..,' !~ ... . . " . -.. :'.~ :. ,", , -~ 'I': " , , .... ,'/' ,,'';:\..' . , ~. , '. . " (. . ,:,. '" ... "t • : Renton· I. ' . -,,~ r, • '(." " . ",' . , .... -!. . . . c, .PARKSIDE 'AT 95' 'BU'RN:ETr'.:'~· ' .... TRAFFJCIMPACT ANAI..YSI.~ '~".,' .... 'I: ~ .. :,;,~'. '~""~ '.... " . .' ~ ... ',' • ' :"" -"J ';-. ,'-, :\ ...... I ", '~ . I'. , ',' . " . \ '. : \" . i : j " '~ . 'Mh:,:'Rlch·S·~n~e~:~y",· ;, " -, """ " . ,','. ",'\ ' , .'."'" '~" ,COLP'ITTS·~'DEVEt.dpMENTCOMPANY ~":' , 'c/o Mr~"Ke~r~m'uthy, Arthit~¢f:',:\" "': 'TSA:ARCI-IiTECTS{,PLlC': " \,' ::,~ ;'~;",;.,j. :::5Q'_11()tI\Av~nue·.S~E~~'.:S·U'it~"io':(" ',1:' 'f .. ~," , , ~ .,' " ,: ~', ·1:< ',' . I'· .... . '.: .,' , ..,.. . < '1"'" ..... +. :" ~. i " ." >.~. " \ ." " .. ' ...... 1'('"",, . : . .., ~- .~ ~ .• r • • , ' . .. , '. ". '.~. . I ,; : , ~~' ',,: I . r, '.' ..... '. ~ ..... ' .(',: ;. ,.: '~., ' .. ' -, ') q. .... , ' ", -:.,' .,,;. . :'.'7. ... ' , ,;, " ~BelleVlie,··WA,~8Q(j4: • I ., ,; ~,\ ) , 1 ';.' .' -' ,~. , , '-') :, t:, , " ~ r: Se ····temtJer.:'10 '2004~ '. P ":.' .,,: . ' . ,'.. ,. ",' , , . ":' ,~: I ,,~ ) -' . ;f""\ r " . I ',' :-•• ,' r '.' ',' : ,"r, . ",' ':'. -: r. ; . . :"'" , ,':~ ,',.. .' ~ . , ' -': ,1" , " "" .. ",' . .', :- .' ,; ".) ,:/' , -: .;,' .. \ ,.'; • 'I, . ... , .. I ..:'- " }' ' . ., ~ . , " 1,.··. " , . ., ,.,J . : ~ .. :'-:" , ~, -"."' .' ..1 . " < ' ;: ',"'-', . .'.,,< ,. . ~. ,( .~. ' ". " '",,' .. ' . • " .~ I \ .. ' '::: ;/ ,"'. '" .:.:-" - ; .' ~.,1 .',:-:.' .. ~. -"', .' :' '. '" ~, . ' . ".' ", I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I • Jake Traffic Engineering, Inc. • Mr. Rich Senseney COLPITTS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY c/o Kent Smutny, Architect TSA ARCHITECTS, PLLC 50 116th Avenue S. E., Suite 101 Bellevue, WA 98004 Re: Parkside at 95 Burnett -Renton Traffic Impact Analysis Dear Mr. Senseney; Mark J. Jacobs, P.E., P.10.E • President 7731 8th Ave SW -Seattle, WA 98106 -2007 Tel. 206.762.1978 -Cell 206.799.5692 -Facsimile 206.762.1978 E-mail jaketraffic@comcaslnet September 10, 2004 We are pleased to submit this Traffic Impact Analysis for the proposed 106 unit apartment project in Renton. The project is generally located on the west side of Burnett Ave. S. and south of the S. Tobin St. alignment. Access to the site is proposed via two driveways on Burnett Avenue South. We have conducted a field review of the site and surrounding street system. The study scope was determined pursuant with our correspondence with Kayren Kittrick, Development Engineering Supervisor of the City of Renton. The following intersections are analyzed in this report: ~ Burnett Ave. S.jS. 2nd St. ~ Burnett Ave. S.jS. 3rd St. ~ Site access intersections The general format of this report is to describe the proposed project, identify existing traffic conditions (baseline), project future traffic conditions and identify Agency streeVroad improvements (future baseline), calculate the traffic that would be generated by the project and then add it to the future baseline traffic volumes. Operational analyses are used to determine the specific project traffic impact and appropriate traffic mitigation measures to reduce the impact. Additionally Agency traffic impact fees are addressed in this report. The summary, conclusions and recommendations begin on page seven of this report. \\Engmeer2\c\-Proted Fdes\200" 034 -Parkside at 95 Burnett-CoIp!tt5 Development Company. TSA· Renton\TratfJe ImpactArralysis Parkslde doc I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Mr. Rich Senseney COLPITIS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY c/o Kent Smutny, Architect TSA ARCHITECTS, PLLC September 10, 2004 Page -2- PROJECT INFORMATION Figure 1 is a vicinity map showing the location of the proposed site and surrounding street network. Figure 2 shows a preliminary site plan prepared by TSA Architects dated September 1, 2004. The plan consists of a 106 unit apartment layout and a pedestrian connection between Burnett Ave. S. and a City Park located along the west side of the site. Access to the site is proposed via two driveways on Burnett Avenue South. Full development and occupancy of the proposed Parkside at 95 Burnett project is anticipated to occur by 2006, presuming the permits are issued in a timely manner. However, to ensure a conservative analysis 2009 has been used as the horizon year. EXISTING ENVIRONMENT Project Site We understand that the site was developed with office, warehouse and retail uses. These uses were documented (reference Table 1 95 Burnett Traffic Impact Analysis dated November 19, 2000 by Transportation Planning and Engineering, Inc.) to have generated 364 average daily vehicular trips. A copy of Table 1 is included in the appendix. No structures currently exist on the site. Street System Figure 3 shows the existing traffic control, number of street lanes, number of approach lanes at intersections and other pertinent information. The primary streets within the study area and their classifications per the City of Renton Comprehensive Plan are as follows: )0-S 2nd St. )0-S. 3rd St. )0-Williams Ave. S. )0-Wells Ave. S. )0-Logan Ave. S. )0-Burnett Ave. S. (south of S. 2nd St.) )0-Burnett Ave. S. (north of S. 2nd St.) PrinCipal Arterial PrinCipal Arterial Minor Arterial Minor Arterial Minor Arterial Collector Arterial Local Access The speed limit on S. 2nd and S. 3rd Streets is 25 MPH. These streets are mUlti-lane PrinCipal Arterials. Posting the same speed limit on multi-lane Principal Arterial streets and residential access streets is contraire to driver expectancy. The City should consider revising the speed limit on S. 2nd and S. 3rd Streets to 30 MPH to differentiate these arterial streets from local access neighborhood streets. Improved driver compliance and improved safety should result with the change in the arterial speed limit to 30 MPH. \\Ertglneer2\c\-Pr0Jeet Flles\2004 034 -Park,IGe at 95 Burnett -ColpIttS Development Company. TSA· Rentnn\Traflic Impact Allalyl;ll Pilrk$ide dO(: I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Mr. Rich Senseney COLPITTS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY c/o Kent Smutny, Architect TSA ARCHITECTS, PLLC Septem ber 10, 2004 Page -3- Transit Services JTE, Inc. The Renton Transit Center is located south of S. 2nd St., north of S. 3rd St., east of Rainier Ave. S. and west of Main Ave. South. Metro Routes 101, 105, 106, 110, 140, 143, 148, 149, 153, 169, 240, 342, 908 and 909 serves the Transit Center. Sound Transit Routes 560 and 565 also provide service to the Transit Center. The proposed project is located less than a ¥4 mile north of the Renton Transit Center. Additional information on these routes is available online at http://transit.metrokc.govj. A bus schedule kiosk or equivalent in the rental office is recommended. Traffic Volumes Figure 4 shows the existing PM peak hour traffic volumes for the analysis intersections. We compared the existing traffic volumes from the Merrill Gardens at Renton Centre Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by Christopher Brown & Associates dated June 14, 2004 and 95 Burnett Traffic Impact AnalYSis. The existing traffic volumes from the Merrill Gardens Traffic Impact Analysis were lower than the traffic volumes from the 95 Burnett Traffic Impact Analysis. Thus for analysis purposes we have utilized the existing traffic volumes from the 95 Burnett Traffic Impact Analysis. Intersection Operations Traffic engineers have developed criteria for intersection operations called level of service (LOS). The LOS are A to F with A and B being very good and E and F being more congested. LOS C and 0 correlate to busy traffic conditions with some restrictions to the ability to choose travel speed, change lanes and the general convenience comfort and safety. LOS Criteria City of Renton staff has identified that the LOS standard is '0'. The analysis intersections currently operates at LOS 'C', thus meets City's standard LOS '0'. Calculation Methodology The procedures in the Transportation Research Board Highway Capacity Manual, 2000 were used to calculate the level of service at the study intersections. The following table depicts the LOS and corresponding average delay in seconds at signalized and stop control intersections: \\Engmeer2\c\-Pr0Ject Ftles\2004.034· Purkaide at 95 Burnett-ColpittS Development Company. TSA-Renton\TrlIfflc ImpactAnIl!ys1S Parkside doc I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Mr. Rich Senseney COLPITIS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY c/o Kent Smutny, Architect TSA ARCHITECTS, PLLC September 10, 2004 Page -4- Intersection Type A B Signalized <10 >10 and <20 Stop Control <10 >10 and <15 LOS Analysis Software Level of Service C D E >20 and >35 and >55 and <35 <55 <80 >15 and >25 and >35 and <25 <35 <50 The LOS of the study intersections were calculated using the following software program: ~ SIGNAL 2000 by Strong Concepts (signalized) ~ Highway Capacity Software (HCS) 2000 by McTrans (stop control) Accident History F >80 >50 We have gleaned accident data from the Merrill Gardens at Renton Centre Traffic Impact Analysis which was provided by City of Renton staff for a three year time period (2001-2003) at the analysis intersections. There were four recorded accidents at the Burnett Ave. S./S. 2nd St. intersection. This yields a rate of 0.3 accidents per million entering vehicles at the intersection. There were eight recorded accidents at the Burnett Ave. S./S/ 3rd St. intersection. This yields a rate of 0.5 accidents per million entering vehicles at the intersection. The accident rate was found using the PM peak hour traffic data and a Uk" factor of 10. This factor presumes that about 10% of the daily traffic occurs during the PM peak hour that is typical. The Washington State Highway Accident Report 1996 identifies average accident rates (per million vehicle miles of travel) on functional classified streets as follows: Principal Arterial: Minor Arterial: Collector: 2.97 3.44 4.27 A direct comparison of the intersection accident rate to the statewide rate is not relevant because the rates do not measure the same thing. The Washington State Highway Accident Report does not contain data on average accident rates per million entering vehicles at intersections. However, based on our experience, an accident rate of less than one is \\Engmeer2\c\-ProJect Flles\2004 034· P;}rkside ilt 95 Burnett· Colplttll DevelOpment COmpany; TSA· Renton\Traffic lmpactAnelysls Parkalde doc I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Mr. Rich Senseney COLPITIS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY c/o Kent Smutny, Architect TSA ARCHITECTS, PLLC September 10, 2004 Page -5- generally considered to indicate that an intersection is operating satisfactorily, one to two is typical, and over two requires further review. The analysis intersections experience accident rates of less than one, thus they appear to be operating satisfactorily. HORIZON YEAR CONDITIONS "WITHOUT" THE PROJECT Historical Traffic Growth We have compared existing traffic volumes at the analysis intersections from the Merrill Gardens at Renton Centre Traffic Impact Analysis and 95 Burnett Traffic Impact Analysis to calculate a growth factor. Based on the existing traffic volume counts the 2004 traffic volumes were less than the 2000 existing traffic volumes. Thus for analysis purposes we have applied a growth factor of one percent per year. The use of a one percent per year growth factor ensures a conservative analysis. Pipeline Project Traffic generated by the 163 unit Merrill Gardens at Renton Centre project was added to the projected 2009 PM peak hour volumes. 2009 Traffic Volumes Figure 5 shows the prOjected 2009 PM peak hour traffic volumes "without" the project. These volumes include the existing traffic volume counts plus background growth and traffic generated by the identified "pipeline" project. Background traffic growth inherently includes traffic generated by development. Therefore, projecting horizon year traffic volumes using both a growth factor and adding "pipeline" traffic data is a conservative approach. TRIP GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTION Definitions A vehicle trip is defined as a single or one direction vehicle movement with either the origin or destination (existing or entering) inside the proposed development. Traffic generated by development projects consists of the following types: Pass-By Trips: Trips made as intermediate stops on the way from an origin to a primary trip destination. \\Engmeer2\c\-Pro}ettFiles\,2004.034 -Pilrksl!klat 95 Burnett· CoIplttlll OevelopmentComplllny, TSA· Renton\Trilffic ImpactAn.tysl$ ParkBlde doc I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Mr. Rich Senseney COLPITIS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY c/o Kent Smutny, Architect TSA ARCHITECTS, PLLC September 10, 2004 Page-6- Diverted Link Trips: Captured Trips: Primary (New) Trips: Trip Generation Trips attracted from the traffic volume on roadways within the vicinity of the generator but require a diversion from that roadway to another roadway to gain access to the site. Site trips shared by more than one land use in a multi-use development. Trips made for the specific purpose of using the services of the project. The proposed Parkside at 95 Burnett project is expected to generate the vehicular trips during the average weekday, street traffic AM and PM peak hours as shown in Table 2. The trip generation for the project is calculated using trip rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation, Seventh Edition, 2003 for Apartment (ITE Land Use Code 220). All site trips made by all vehicles for all purposes, including commuter, visitor, and service and delivery vehicle trips are included in the trip generation values. Table B.2 'Transportation Impact Factors Development Around Bus Transit Corridors" (attached in the appendix) of the Trip Generation Handbook Appendix B identifies that a 5% vehicle trip reduction could be made to the trip generation if a project has required minimum residential density and is located within V4 mile of a transit center. The proposed project meets the requirements as identified in Table B.3, therefore qualifying for the 10% trip reduction. This would yield to 71 fewer daily automobile trips and seven fewer PM peak hour trips. Based on our analysis, the automobile trips generated by Parkside at 95 Burnett project are calculated to be 649 daily trips and 59 trips during the PM peak hour. During the PM peak hour 65% of the trips would be entering and 35% would be exiting the development. No adjustment for the previous site development is taken. Trip Distribution Figure 6 shows the site generated traffic assigned to the street system based on past project experience in the City. Trips to and from the site were also distributed to the surrounding street network based on the characteristics of the street network, existing traffic volume patterns, the location of likely trip origins and destinations (residential, business, shopping, social and recreational opportunities) and previous traffic studies. \\£nglneer2\c\-Project flles\2004 034 -Pilrkslde iIt 95 Bennett -CoIprtts Development Company. TSA· Renmn\Trilffic ImpactAnal)ei;s Perkside.doc I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Mr. Rich Senseney COLPITTS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY c/o Kent Smutny, Architect TSA ARCHITECTS, PLLC September 10, 2004 Page-7- HORIZON YEAR CONDITIONS "WITH" THE PROJECT Traffic Volumes JTE, Inc. Figure 7 shows the 2009 PM peak hour traffic volumes "with" the proposed project at the analysis and site access intersections. The site generated PM peak hour traffic volumes shown on Figure 6 were added to the projected background traffic volumes shown on Figure 5 to obtain the Figure 7 volumes. Level of Service Table 1 shows the calculated LOS for the horizon year (2009) "with" and "without" project conditions at the pertinent intersections. Based on our analysis the analyzed intersections would continue to operate at LOS 'C' or better for both "with" and "without" project conditions. Site Access Access to the site is proposed via two new driveways (north site access and south site access) on Burnett Ave. South. The proposed site accesses (north and south) is expected to operate at LOS 'A' for the northbound left turn movements and LOS 'B' for eastbound movements. AGENCY TRAFFIC IMPACT MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS The City of Renton requires a traffic impact fee for new developments based on the number of new average daily trips generated. The current fee is $75.00 per new average daily trip. The Parkside at 95 Burnett is expected to generate 641 new average daily automobile trips. The previous site development was documented to generate 364 daily trips. Thus the traffic impact fee to the City of Renton is $20,775 (641 daily site trips -364 trips). SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS This report analyzed the traffic impact of the proposed 106 unit Parkside at 95 Burnett Apartments project generally located on the west side of Burnett Ave. S. and south of S. Tobin St alignment. Existing traffic data was obtained at the pertinent street intersections identified for analysis. Future horizon year traffic volumes were derived using a growth factor of two percent per year. Level of service analyses were performed for existing and projected future horizon traffic volumes. The evaluation of the traffic impact of the proposed project included adding project generated traffic to the future traffic volume projections and \\Engmeer2\c\-PrOJecl Fll81\2004 034· Parkaide at 95 Burnett· Colpll:t$ Development Company: TSA -Renton\Traffic Impact Analytla ParbKle doc I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Mr. Rich Senseney COLPITTS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY c/o Kent Smutny, Architect TSA ARCHITECTS, PLLC September 10, 2004 Page -8- calculating the level of service. The "with" project traffic operations were then compared to the "without" project operations. The comparison of traffic operations "with" and "without" the project identified that the project would not cause a significant adverse affect on the operation of the study intersections. Based on our analysis we recommend that the Parkside at 95 Burnett project be allowed with the following traffic impact mitigation measures. 1. Install a bus schedule kiosk or equivalent in the rental office. 2. Construct site in accordance with applicable City requirements. 3. Contribute $20,775 towards the City of Renton traffic impact mitigation fee program. No other traffic mitigation should be necessary. Please contact me at (206) 762-1978 or email meatjaketraffic@comcast.netif you have any questions. MJJ: cw I Sincerely, Mark J. Jacobs, P.E., P.T.O.E., President JAKE TRAFFIC ENGINEERING, INC \\Engm(l8l2\c\-Project Frles\2004 034 -Parks Ide at 95 Bumet1-CofptUs Deveiopmftnt Company. TSA -Renton\Traffic tmp&et AnarY.illS Parkside doc I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I PM PEAK HOUR LEVEL OF SERVICE TABLE 1 PARKSIDE AT 95 BURNETT -RENTON TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS INTERSECTION APPROACH EXISTING 2009W/O 2009W/ PROJECT PROJECT S. 2nd St./ Overall C (22.0) C (22.7) C (22.9) Burnett Ave. S. S. 3rd St./ Overall C (21.8) C (23.4) C (23.8) Burnett Ave. S. North Site Access/ NBLT --A (7.6) Burnett Ave. S. EB --A (9.5) South Site Access/ NBLT --A (7.6) Burnett Ave. S. EB --A (9.5) Number shown in parenthesis is the average control delay in seconds per vehicle for the intersection as a whole or approach movement, which determines the LOS per the Highway Capacitv Manual. \\Eflgllleer2\C\-Pfoject Fllea\200.4 034· Palklilde at 95 Burnett· ColpIttS Development Company TSA· Renton\Traffic Impact AnalysIS Pa~de doc I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I JTE, ~nc. VEHICULAR TRIP GENERATION TABLE 2 PARKSIDE AT 95 BURNETT -RENTON TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TIME TRIP TRIPS TRIPS TOTAL PERIOD RATE ENTERING EXITING Apartment (lTE Land Use 220, 106 units) Average Weekday T= 6.72X 356 (50%) 356 (50%) 712 (641)1 AM Peak Hour T =0.51X 11 (20%) 43 (80%) 54 (49)1 PM peak Hour T= 0.62X 43 (65%) 23 (35%) 66 (59)1 T = trips X = 1,000 sq. ft. A vehicle trip is defined as a single or one direction vehicle movement with either the origin or destination (existing or entering) inside the study site. The above trip generation values account for all the site trips made by all vehicles for all purposes, including commuter, visitor, recreation, and service and delivery vehicle trips 1 Number of trips with a 10% trip reduction, due to nearby transit center, per Table 8.3 of the Trip Generation Handbook \\£ngmeor2\c\-ProJect Flles\2004 034 -Pilrkside lit 95 Burnett -Colpttta Development Company. TSA-Renton\Traffic Impact Analysis ParMlde doc I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Project: Parkside at 95 Burnett Location: West side of Burnett Ave. S. and south of S. Tobin St. alignment Owner: Colpitts Development Company JIiES) ~[(i)©o FIGURE 1 PARKSIDE AT 95 BURNETT -RENTON TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS VICINITY MAP NORTH I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Project: Parkside at 95 Burnett Location: West side of Burnett Ave. S. and south of S. Tobin St. alignment Owner: Colpitts Development Company J1rlEiJ ~rn)(~o FIGURE 2 PARKSIDE AT 95 BURNETT -RENTON TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS SITE PLAN t NORTH I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - Project: Parkside at 95 Burnett Location: West side of Burnett Ave. S. and south of S. Tobin St. alignment Owner: Colpitts Development Company ~ IJ'o NBLT NBT ~ EBL(T ~ EBT/R ~ ~ SBT/L 1fI'~ JY[E~ ~l1i1©o FIGURE 3 PARKSIDE AT 95 BURNEIT -RENTON TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS EXISTING CONDITIONS t NORTH I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Project: Parkside at 95 Burnett Location: West side of Burnett Ave. S. and south of S. Tobin St. alignment Owner: Colpitts Development Company 86 60 lit ~ ~ ~ 139 116 Wednesday 02.23.2000 1530-1630 02002_ .AI ~ 85 +-685 I!t 85 t NORTH * -Counts gleaned from 95 Burnett Traffic Impact Analysis and are higher than the reviewed 2004 count data J'fEp hil©. FIGURE 4 PARKSIDE AT 95 BURNETT -RENTON TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS EXISTING PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II I Project: Parkside at 95 Burnett Location: West side of Burnett Ave. S. and south of S. Tobin St. alignment Owner: Colpitts Development Company II fI) :.TllIicum:SI---W------.,. ---~ - 105 75 ~ ~ j ~ i" 150 140 ~ 105 4-750 I':t 95 ~rrEp ~UilCo FIGURE 5 PARKSIDE AT 95 BURNETT -RENTON TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS t NORTH PROJECTED 2009 PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES WIO PROJECT I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Project: Parkside at 95 Burnett Total PM peak hour vehicular trips: 59 Entering: 38 Exiting: 21 n S:2nd ~ I I --/ JtrEp ~!7il©o FIGURE 6 PARKSIDE AT 95 BURNETT -RENTON TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS t NORTH PROJECT GENERATED PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND DISTRIBUTION I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Project: Parkside at 95 Burnett Location: West side of Burnett Ave. S. and south of S. Tobin St. alignment Owner: Colpitts Development Company II en :TiUicum:SI==:::=;:J ~ -= ~ '" JllE~ ~tl'il©o FIGURE 7 PARKSIDE AT 95 BURNETT -RENTON TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS NORTH PROJECTED 2009 PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES WI PROJECT I I I I I I I I I I I I I I A~IP'!EtNJ/O)O~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I TABLE 1 95 BURNETT TRAFRC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRIP GENERATION OF EXlsnNG ONwSlTE USES Time Period Trip Rate Trips Trips Entering Exiting OFRCE ITE LAND USE CODE 710, AREA=2,600 SQ. FT. 14 14 Average Weekday 11.01 50% 50% AM Peak Hour 1.56 3 1 88% 12% PM Peak Hour 0.62 1 3 17% 83% WAREHOUSE ITE LAND USE CODE 150, AREA=26,895 SQ.FT. 66 67 Average Weekday 4.96 50% 50% AM Peak Hour 0.45 10 2 82% 18% PM Peak Hour 0.51 3 11 24% 76% RETAIL ITE LAND USE CODE 814, AREA=5,OOO SQ.FT. 102 101 Average Weekday 40.67 50% 50% AM Peak Hour 0.71* 2 2 61% 39% PM Peak Hour 2.59 6 7 43% 57% TOTAL EXISTING SITE TRIP GENERATION Average Weekday 182 182 AM Peak Hour 15 5 PM Peak Hour 10 21 . . . . . . The triP generation IS calculated uSing the average trip rates In the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation. Sixth Edition. Total 28 4 .4 133 12 14 203 4 13 364 20, 31 * AM peak hour rate not shown in ITE Trip Generation for this land use. Rate was estimated by the proportion of AM to PM rates for other ITE retail land uses. Jovrcc. 9(" ilJrAe.ttTr.:-ff,"( _TI-l~ ~.: l;:>f'rJ:' )~~~O II/Zo/OO j, l' /r., ..... r/,',)'-+...!/"''' P / &. , ...... " 0 '( £,-".j:h.ee-/,'.5.l ZMc:..., (j) ~~1"fA.d)C I' 1 S. TobIn. Street 1 1 en_ ~- 1 ~, ~' c 11 1'\ . t~r; ~~. t~r;. I ,. I 1 ' --'~ V So~th 3rd Street I -' ........ 1"32-t~~ 1 I I FIGURE 3 I Current P.M. Peak HourTraftic Volumes I -8- I , . -I- e: g!, « -..---' ~ . ~~. 709>"" ~ ~, " V -, .. - . en Q) ~" ~, c( tit --:J , \, ) OlMtopher Brown (l1 AssooiatecB 9688 Oai~r Ave. ~. -&alUe. VIA 98118-5981 'l'l2~1910 f'llx' tJ ,) I I I I I I I I I I" I I I I I I I I I , N not to scale Alley S 2nd st. S 3rd St. LEGENp Project S. Tobin St. Site t----------- - ~~ "'-.85 ., 4-685 ~ T'"'85 --One Way ~ t Wednesday 0)(0 Feb. 24. 2000 ~ ::: 3: 30-4: 30 79-11 tr 958--171~ ~g lh day ...... ura +J +J CD C L.. :::J m Feb. 23. 2000 " 4:00-5:00 One Way-- X--PM Peal< Hour Tr_~ffic Volume & Direction 2000 PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES 95 BURNETT TRAmC IMPACT ANALYSIS FIGURE 4 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Parltside at 95 Burnett Burnett Ave. S./S. 2nd St. Existing (BAS2BX) SIGNAL2000/TEAPACrver 2.02.12] -Capacity Ana1ysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int i 1- Sq 11 **/** /1\ 1 1 North 1 Degree of Saturation (v / c) 0.39 Vehic1e De1ay Phase 1 Phase 2 I + + A I I + + ****1 1<+ + <****1 1 v ****1 1 A v I I <* * I I * * I 1 * * 1 G/C=0.501 I G/0=0.432 1 I G= 60.2" I G= 51.8" 1 I Y+R= 4.0" 1 Y+R= 4.0" 1 I OFF: 0.0% 1 OFF=53.5% I 22.0 08/31/04 15:28:15 Leve1 of Service C+ 0=120 sec G=112.0 sec = 93.3% Y= 8.0 sec = 6.7% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% 1 Lane IWidth/ I q/C 1 Service Rate 1 Adj 1 1 HOI 1 L 1 Queue I Group I Lanes I Reqd Used I @C (vpb) @B I Volume 1 vIc I De1ay I S IMode1 11 N Approach 16.5 B IRT+D I 12/1 10.276 10.501 I 735 I 855 1 154 10.180 I 16.5 B I 131 ftl -------------------------------------~----------------------------------------- S Approach 19.1 B D+LTI 12/1 10.340 10.501 1 556 I 663 I 268 10.404 I 19.1 I*B 1 258 ftl ,------------------------------------------------------------------------------- B Approach 23.9 C+ IRT+'.fB+LTI. 36/3 10.316 10.432 I 18271 2110 I 899 10.426 I 23.9 I*C+I 344 ftl I Parks ide at 95 Burnett 08/31/04 Burnett Ave. S'/S, 2nd st. 15:28:22 I Existing (BAS2EX) 'I SIGNAL2000/TEAPAC[Ver 2.02.12] -Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int i 1 - METROAREA NonCBD NETWORK North 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Def No I LOS Targets 35 80 5 NETWORK East 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Def No 90 100 5 NETWORK South 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Def No Priorities 0 0 0 0 0 0 NETWORK west 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Def No NODELOCATION 0 0 I Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S w I GRADES 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PEDLEVELS 15 15 15 15 BIKEVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 PARKINGSIDES None None None None I PARRVOLtlMES 20 20 20 20 BUSVOLtlMES 0 5 5 5 RIGIft'roRNONREDS 0 0 0 0 UPSTREAMVC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 I Movement Parameters MOVLABELS RT TB LT RT TB LT RT TB LT RT TB LT I VOLUMES 86 60 0 85 685 85 0 116 139 0 0 0 WIDTHS 0.0 12.0 0.0 0.0 36.0 0.0 0.0 12.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 LANES 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 GROUPTYPES Norm. Norm. Norm. NOXDl NOXDl NOXDl NOXDl NOXDl NOXDl NOXDl NOXDl NoXDl I UTILIZATIONS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TROCKPERCENTS 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 PEAKllOURFACTORS 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 ARRIVALTYPES 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 I ACTUATIONS Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes REQCLEARANCES 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0' 4.0 MINIMtJMS 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 I STARTUPLOST 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 ENDGAIN 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 STORAGE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 INITIALQUEUE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I IDEALSATFLOWS 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 FACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 DELAYFACTOas 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NSTOPFACTOas 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I SATORATIONFLOWS ' 0 1705 0 0 4886 0 0 1321 0 0 0 0 Pbasinq Parameters I SEQUENCES 11 ALL PERMISSIVES No No No No LEADLAGS None None OVERLAPS Yes Yes Yes Yes OFFSET 0.00 1 CYCLES 120 120 30 PEDTIME 0.0 0 I GREENTIMES 60.18 51.82 YELLOWTIMES 4.00 4.00 CRITICALS 8 5 I I @ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Parkside at 95 Burnett Burnett Ave. S./S. 2nd St. Without Project (BAS2WO) SIGNAL2000/TEAPAC[Ver 2.02.12] Intersection Averages for Int i 1- Sq 11 **/** . /1\ I I North I Degree of Saturation (vIc) 0.44 Vehicle Delay 22.7 Phase 1 Phase 2 I + + ,. I I + + ****1 1<+ + <****1 I v ****1 1 ,. v 1 1 <* * 1 1 * * 1 1 * * 1 1 G/C=O.501 1 G/0=0.432 1 I G= 60.2" I G= 51.8" 1 1 Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 4.0" I 1 OFF: 0.0% 1 OFF=53.5% 1 08/31/04 15:27:11 Level of Service C+ 0=120 sec G=112.0 sec = 93.3% y= 8.0 sec = 6.7% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% 1 Lane IWidth/ I g/C I Service Rate I Adj 1 I RCM I L I Queue I Group I Lanes I Reqd Used I @C (Vph) @E IVol.umel v/c I Del.ay I S IModel 11 N Approach 16.9· B IRT+TB 1 12/1 10.285 10.501 I 736 I 856 I 190 10.222 1 16.9 B 1 165 ftl S Approach 20.3 C+ TB+LTI 12/1 10.369 10.501 1 525 I 630 1 305 10.484 1 20.3 I*C+I 309 ftl E Approach 24.5 C+ 1 RT+TB+LT 1 36/3 10.327 10.432 1 1822 I 2105 1 1000 10.475 1 24.5 I*C+I 391 ftl I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ,I I I Parks ide at 95 Burnett Burnett Ave. S./S. 2nd St. Wi thout Project (BAS2WO) SIGNAL2000/TEAPAC [Ver 2.02.12] -Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 1 - MBTROARBA NonCBD NBTIIORK North 0 0 0 0 LOS Targets 35 80 5 NETWORK East 0 0 0 0 90 100 5 NETWORK South 0 0 0 0 . Priori ties 0 0 0 0 0 0 NETWORK West 0 0 0 0 NODBLOCATION 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N B S GRADES 0.0 0.0 0.0 PBDLEVELS 15 15 15 BIKEVOL'OMBS 0 0 0 PAR1UNGSIDBS None None None PARKVOL'OMBS 20 20 20 BOSVOLUMES 0 5 5 RIGB'lTURNONRBDS 0 0 0 UPSTRBAMVC 0.00 0.00 0.00 Movement Parameters MOVLABBLS RT TB LT RT TB LT RT TB LT VOLtlMBS 105 75 0 105 750 95 0 140 150 WIDTHS 0.0 12.0 0.0 0.0 36.0 0.0 0.0 12.0 0.0 LANES 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 GROUPTYPBS Norm Norm Norm Norm Norm Norm Norm Norm Norm UTILIZATIONS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TRUCltPBRCBNTS 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 PBAKIIOtJRFACTORS 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 ARRIVALTYPBS 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ACTUATIONS Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes RBQCLEARANCES 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 MINIMUMS 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 STARTOPLOST 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 ENDGAIN 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 STORAGE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 INITIALQUBUB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 mEALSATFLOWS 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 FACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 DBLAYFACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NS'1'OPFACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 SA'l'ORATIONFLOWS 0 1707 0 0 4875 0 o 1256 0 Phasing' Parame~rs SEQUENCES 11 ALL PERMISSI:VES No No No No LEADLAGS OVERLAPS Yes Yes Yes Yes OFFSET CYCLES 120 120 30 PEDTIME GREEN'l"IMES 60.18 51.82 YELLOWTIMES 4.00 4.00 CRITICALS 8 5 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 RT 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 08/31/04 15:27:23 Def No Def No Def No Def No W 0.0 15 0 None 20 5- 0 0.00 TB LT 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 Norm Norm Noxm 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.95 0.95 0.95 3 3 3 Yes Yes Yes 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 0 0 None None 0.00 1 0.0 0 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Parks ide at 95 Burnett Burnett Ave. S. IS. 2nd st. With Project (BAS2WP) SIGNAL2000/TEAPAC[Ver 2.02.12] -Capacity Ana1ysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 1- 09/01/04 14:32:07 Degree of Saturation (vIc) 0.46 Vehic1e De1ay 22.9 Leve1 of Service C+ Sq 11 **1** 11\ I I Horth I Phase 1 Phcise 2 1 + + ,. 1 I + + ****1 1<+ + <****1 1 v ****1 I ,. v I I <* * I I * * 1 1 * * 1 1 G/C=0.502 I G/e=0.432 1 G= 60.2" I G= 51.8" 1 1 Y+R= 4.0" 1 Y+R= 4.0" 1 I OFF= 0.0% I 0FF=53.5% I 0=120 sec G=112.0 sec = 93.3% Y= 8.0 sec = 6.7% Pad= 0.0 sec = 0.0% I Lane IWidth/1 g/C I Service Rate I Adj I I RCM I L I Queue I Group I Lanes I Reqd Used 1 @C (vph) @E I Volume I vIc I De1ay I S IModel 11 ---------------------------------~--------------------------------------------- H Approach 17.2 B IRT+TB I 12/1 10.291 10.502 I 739 I 859 I 211 10.246 I 17.2 B I 185 ftl S Approach 21.1 C+ TB+LTI 12/1 10.384 10.502 I 521 I 625 I 329 10.526 I 21.1 I*C+I 342 ftl -------------------------------------------------------------------------~----- E Approach 24.7 C+ IRT+TB+LTI 36/3 10.329 10.432 1 1819 1 2101 1 1015 10.483 1 24.7 I*C+I 398 ftl .J I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Parkside at 95 Burnett Burnett Ave. S./S. 2nd St. With Projeot (BAS2WP) SIGMAL2000/TEAPAC[Ver 2.02.12] Intersection Parameters for METROARBA NonCBD LOS Targets 35 80 5 90 100 5 Priorities 0 0 0 0 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N GRADES 0.0 PEDLEVELS 15 BIKEVOLUMES 0 PARKINGSIDES None PARKVOLOMES 20 BUSVOLUMES 0 lUGBfttJRNONREDS 0 UPSTREAMVC 0.00 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS RT TH LT VOLUMES 112 88 0 WIDTHS 0.0 12.0 0.0 LANES 0 1 0 GROOPTYPBS Norm Norm Norm U'lILIZATIONS 0.00 0.00 0.00 TRUCKPERCENTS 2.0 2.0 2.0 PEAlaIOtJRFAC'rORS 0.95 0.95 0.95 ARRIVALTYPES 3 3 3 ACTUATIONS Yes Yes Yes REQCLEARANCBS 4.0 4.0 4.0 MINIMtlNS 5.0 5.0 5.0 STAR'lUPLOST 2.0 2.0 2.0 ENDGAIN 2.0 2.0 2.0 STORAGE 0 0 0 INITIALQUEUE 0 0 0 mEALSATFLOWS 1900 1900 1900 FACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 DELAYFAcTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 NSTOPFACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 SA'l'URATIONFLOWS o 1713 0 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 11 ALL PERMISSIVES No No OVERLAPS Yes Yes CYCLES 120 120 GRBBNTIMES 60.18 51.82 YBLLOW'l'IMES 4.00 4.00 ClUTICALS 8 5 09/01/04 14:32:18 -SUllllllary of Parameter Vuues Int# 1 - NEftORK North 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Def No NETWORK East 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Def No NETWORK South 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Def No NETWORK West 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Def No NODELOCATION 0 0 E S W 0.0 0.0 0.0 15 15 15 0 0 0 None None None 20 20 20 5 5 5 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT 120 750 95 0 162 150 0 0 0 0.0 36.0 0.0 0.0 12.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0' Norm Norm Norm Norm Norm Nom Norm Norm Norm 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes· Yes Yes Yes 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 o 4865 0 o 1245 0 0 0 0 No No LEADLAGS None None Yes Yes OFFSBT 0.00 1 30 PEDTIME 0.0 0 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Parks ide at 95 Burnett 08/31/04 Burnett Ave. s./s. 3rd St. 15:33:29 Existing (BAS3BX) SIGNAL2000/TEAPAC[Ver 2.02.12] -Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 1- Degree of Saturati~n (vIc) 0.60 Vehicle Delay 21. 8 Level of Service C+ Sq 11 **1** . 11\ 1 I North I Phase 1 Phase 2 I * * I i * * I 1 * *> 1 I v ,. I I A 1**** I I + +>1****> I I + + 1**** I I + + I v I I G/C=0.378 I G/C=0.555 I I G= 45.4" I G= 66.6" I I Y+R= 4.0" , Y+R= 4.0" I I OFF: 0.0% I OFF=41.1% I C=120 sec G=112.0 sec = 93.3% Y= 8.0 sec = 6.7% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% -----------~--------------------~----------------------------------------------I Lane 1 Width/ I g/C , Service Rate, Adj 1 1 BeN I L I Queue I Group 1 LaDes I Reqd Used I @C (vph) @E 1 Volume , vIc 1 Delay I S IModel 11 N Approach 26.8 C+ TB+LTI 12/1 10.292 10.378 I 316 I 468 I 149 10.318 1 26 .. 8 I*C+I 164 ftl S Approach 27.8 C IRT+TB , 12/1 10.305 10.378 I 447 1 637 I 258 10.405 1 27.8 C, 287 ftl W Approach 20.0 B I RT+TB+LT 1 24/2 10.441 10.555 , 1771 , 1880 , 1271 10.676 I 20.0 I*B I 694 ftl I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Parks ide at 95 Burnett Burnett Ave. S./S. 3rd St. Existing (BAS3EX) SIGNAL2000/TEAPAC[Ver 2.02.12] -Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 1 - ME'lROAREA NonCBD NETWORK North 0 0 0 0 LOS Targets 35 80 5 NETWORK East 0 0 0 0 90 100 5 NETWORK South 0 0 0 0 Priorities 0 0 0 0 0 0 NETWORK west 0 0 0 0 NODELOCATION 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S GRADES 0.0 0.0 0.0 PEDLEVELS 15 15 15 BIKEVOLUMES 0 0 0 PARKINGSIDES None None None PARKVOLUMES 20 20 20 BUSVOLUMES 0 5 5 RIGBTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 UPSTREAMVC 0.00 0.00 0.00 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS RT 'l'B LT RT 'l'B LT RT 'l'B LT VOLUMES 0 71 70 0 0 0 130 115 0 WID'l'BS 0.0 12.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.0 0.0 LANES 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 GROUPTYPES Norm Norm Norm Norm Norm Norm Norm Norm Norm UTILIZATIONS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TRUCKPERCENTS 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 PEAKBOURFACTORS 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 ARRIVALTYPES 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ACTUATIONS Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes REQCLEARANCES 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 MINIMUMS 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 STAR'l'OPLOST 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 ENDGAIN 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 STORAGE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 INITIALQUEUE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IDEALSATFLOWS 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 FACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 DELAYFAC'l'ORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NSTOPFACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 SATURATIOHFLOWS o 1237 0 0 0 0 o 1684 0 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 11 ALL PERMISSIVES No No No No LEADLAGS OVERLAPS Yes Yes Yes Yes OFFSET CYCLES 120 120 30 PEDTIME GREENTIMES 45.38 66.62 YELLOWTIMES 4.00 4.00 CRITICALS 2 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RT 171 0 0 0 0 0 08/31/04 15:33:38 Def·No Def No Def No Def No W 0.0 15 0 None 20 5 0 0.00 'l'B LT 958 79 0.0 24.0 0.0 0 2 0 Norm Norm Norm 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.95 0.95 0.95 3 3 3 Yes Yes Yes 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 3386 0 None None 0.00 1 0.0 0 I. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Parks ide at 95 Burnett Burnett Ave. S ./s. 3rd St. Without Project (BAS31IO) SIGNAL2000/TEAPAC[Ver 2.02.12] Intersection Averages for Int # 1- Sq 11 **1** . 11\ I I North I Degree of Saturation (vIc) 0.67 -Vehicle Delay 23.4 Phase 1 Phase 2 * * I * * I * *> I v I A A 1**** + +>1****> + + 1**** + + I v 1 G/c=0.378 1 G/c=0.555 I 1 G= 45.4" I G= 66.6" I I Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 4.0" I 1 OFF: 0.0% 1 OFF:41.1% I 08/31/04 15:32:29 Level of Service C+ C=120 sec G=112.0 sec = 93.3% Y= 8.0 sec = 6.7% Pad= 0.0 sec = 0.0% I Lane IWidth/1 g/C 1 Service Rate I Adj I I HOI I L I Queue I Group I Lanes I Reqd Used I @C (vph) @E I Volume I vIc I Delay I S IModel 11 ------------------------------------------------~------------------------------ N Approach 28.0 C TB+LTI 12/1 10.308 10.378 I 287 I 428 I 173 10.403 I 28.0 I*C I 198 ftl S Approach 28.6. C IRT+TB I 12/1 10.317 10.378 I 445 I 635 I 290 10.457 I 28.6 I C I 329 ftl W Approach 21.8 C+ IRT+TB+LTI 24/2 10.468 10.555 I 1771 1 1880 I 1395 10.742 I 21.8 I*C+I 808 ftl I Parkside at 95 Burnett 08/31/04 Burnett Ave. S./S. 3rd St. 15:32:35 I Without Project (BAS3WO) I SIGNAL2000/TEAPAC[Ver 2.02.12] -Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 1 - MB'l'ROAREA NonCBD NE'l'WORK North 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Def No I LOS Targets 35 80 5 NE'l'WORK East 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Def No 90 100 5 NE'l'WORK South 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Def No Priorities 0 0 0 0 0 0 NE'l'WORK West 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Def No NODELOCATION 0 0 I Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S W I GRADES 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PEDLEVELS 15 15 15 15 BIKBVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 PARKINGSIDES None None None None I PARKVOLUMES 20 20 20 20 BUSVOLUMES 0 5 5 5 RIGHTTORNONREDS 0 0 0 0 I UPSTREAMVC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS RT TIl LT R'l' TB LT RT TIl LT RT TB LT I VOLUMES 0 85 80 0 0 0 150 125 0 185 1050 90 WIDTHS 0.0 12.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.0 0.0 0.0 24.0 0.0 LANES 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 GROUPTYPES Noxa Noxa Noxa Norm Norm Norm Noxa Noxa Noxa Norm Noxa Norm I UTILIZATIONS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TRUCKPERCENTS 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 PEARBOURFACTORS 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 I ARRIVALTYPES 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ACTUA'l'IONS Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes REQCLEARANCES 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 MINIMUMS 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 I STARTtiPLOST 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 ENDGAIN 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 STORAGE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 INITIALQUEUE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I IDEALSATFLOWS 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 FACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 DELAYFACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I NSTOPFACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 SATtJRATIONFLOWS 0 1134 0 0 0 0 o 1680 0 o 3386 0 Phasing Parameters I SEQUENCES 11 ALL PERMISSIVES No No No No LEADLAGS None None OVERLAPS Yes Yes Yes Yes OFFSET 0.00 1 CYCLES 120 120 30 PEDTIME 0.0 0 I GREENTIMES 45.38 66.62 YELLOII'l'IMBS 4.00 4.00 CRITICALS 2 11 I I ® I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Parks ide at 95 Burnett 09/01/04 Burnett Ave. s./s. 3rd st. 14:32:51 ·With Project (BAS3WP) SIGNAL2000/TEAPAC[Ver 2.02.12] -Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int' 1- Degree of Saturation (vIc) 0.68 Vehic1e Delay 23.8 Level of Service C+, Sq 11 **/** 11\ I 1 North I Phase 1 * * I * * I * *> I Phase 2 vi'" '" 1**** + +>1****> + + 1**** + + I v G/C=0.378 I G/C=0.555 I I G= 45.4" I G= 66.6" I I Y+R;= 4.0" I Y+R;= 4.0" I I OFF= 0.0% I OFF=41.2% I C=120 sec G=112.0 sec = 93.3% Y= 8.0 sec = 6.7% ~ 0.0 sec = 0.0% I Lane IWidthl I g/C I Service Rate I Adj I I BeN I L I Queue 1 Group I Lanes I Reqd Used 1 @C (vph) @E I Volume I vIc I Delay I S IModel 11 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- N Approach 29.0 C TB+LTI 12/1 10.324 10.378 I 270 I 404 I 188 10.463 I 29.0 I*C I 222 ftl ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- S Approach 28.8 C IRT+TB 1 12/1 10.320 10.378 I 447 I 637 I 300 10.471 I 28.8 C I 342 ftl -------------------------------------------------------~----------------------- W Approach 22.0 C+ I~+TB+LTI 24/2 10.471 10.555 1 1769 1 1878 1 1407 10.749 I 22.0 I*C+I 821 ftl I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Parks ide at 95 Burnett Burnett Ave. S./S. 3rd St. Wi th Project (BAS3WP) SIGNAL2000/TEAPAC[Ver 2.02.12] Intersection Parameters for METROAREA NonCBD LOS Targets 35 80 5 90 100 5 Priorities 0 0 0 0 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABBLS N GRADBS 0.0 PBDLBVELS 15 BIKEVOLUMES 0 PAlU(INGSIDES None PARRVOLtJMES 20 BOSVOLUMES 0 RIGIIT'J.'URNONREDS 0 OPSTREAMVC 0.00 Movement Parameters MOVLABBLS RT TIl LT VOLUMES 0 90 88 WIDTHS 0.0 12.0 0.0 LANES 0 1 0 GROlJP'.rYPES Roxm Noxm Noxm UTILIZATIONS 0.00 0.00 0.00 TROCKPERCENTS 2.0 2.0 2.0 PBAKBOORFACTORS 0.95 0.95 0.95 ARRIVALTYPBS 3 3 3 ACTUATIONS Yes Yes Yes RBQCLEARANCBS 4.0 4.0 4.0 MINIMUMS 5.0 5.0 5.0 STARTtJPLOST 2.0 2.0 2.0 ENDGAIN 2.0 2.0 2.0 STORAGE 0 0 0 INITIALQUBUE 0 0 0 mBALSATFLOWS 1900 1900 1900 FACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 DBLAYFACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 NSTOPFACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 SATORATIONFLOIfS 0 1073 0 Phasing Parameters SEQOBNCBS 11 ALL PERMISSIVES No No OVERLAPS Yes Yes CYCLES 120 120 GREENTIMES 45.38 66.62 YBLI.OIITIMES 4.00 4.00 CRITICALS 2 11 Int # 1 - NETWORK North 0 0 0 0 NE'ftIORK Bast 0 0 0 0 NETWORK South 0 0 0 0 NE'ftiORK West 0 0 0 0 NODBLOCATION 0 B S 0.0 0.0 15 15 0 0 None None 20 20 5 5 0 0 0.00 0.00 RT TIl LT RT TIl LT 0 0 0 150 135 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Noxm Noxm Noxm Noxm Noxm Noxm 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 3 3 3 3 3 3 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1900 1900.1900 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 0 0 0 1685 0 No No LEADLAGS Yes Yes OFFSET 30 PEDTIME 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RT 0 0 0 0 0 09/01/04 14:33:01 Def.No Def No Def No Def No W 0.0 15 0 None 20 5 0 0.00 TH LT 185 1050 102 0.0 24.0 0.0 0 2 0 Noxm Noxm Noxm 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 o . 95 O. 95 O •. 95 3 3 3· Yes Yes Yes 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 o 3382 0 None None 0.00 1 0.0 0 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Two-Way Stop Control TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY lGeneral Information !Site Information lAnalyst Chris Valdez ntersection NSAlBumett IAgency/Co. JTE, INC ~urisdiction Renton pate Performed ·813112004 ~atysis Year With Project . Analysis Time Period PM peak Project Description Pammde at 95 Burnett (NSABASWP) IEastlWest Street North Site Access (North/South Street Burnett Ave. S. ntersection Orientation: North-SOuth IStudV Period (hrs): 0.25 lVehicle Volumes and Adjusbnents Major Street Northbound Southbound lMovement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Wolume 18 240 0 0 178 2 Peak-Hour Factor PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Row Rate, HFR 18 252 0 0 187 2 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 - -0 -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR iUpstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement • 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 0 0 0 1 0 10 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 1 0 10 Percent HeC!"'l Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 lPercent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N ~orage 0 0 ~T Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 1 0 lConfiguration LTR [Delay. Queue Lengtll and Level of Service ~proach NB SB Westbound Eastbound IMovement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 [Lane Configuration LT LTR ~ (vph) 18 11 ~ (m) (vph) 1397 816 ~/c 0.01 0.01 195% queue length 0.04 0.04 lControl Delay 7.6 9.5 1'-08 A A jApproach Delay --9.5 iAPproach LOS --A > Ct6J Copyright C 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1c file:IIC:\Documents%20and%20Settings\Owner\Local%20Settings\Temp\u2k17C.tmp 9/112004 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I n Considering that til ~ I ' , parking demands p. percent of what is ~ iOj arise given the amd ~j Accidents n Accident data was ( )ti the complete or full . . accident data sho~ CIlt I j r-I , rl • Burnett Ave) lie I ~, • Burnett AveJ • Burnett Avd ie' Will" A : I I • 1 lams VI Illl • Williams Av! I • Williams Avi fiU • Wells S. at S; ~ttl • -Wells Avenut • Logan AvemJ is • LoganlSmithj LJ • -MonisAvcJ Whi rth A! r-I • two n) en • S~ckAv~ u • Morns Avenll .... Whitw rth I I • • 0 Al m' • Shattuck Ave] L . * SeeAppenalX for j ~ . _I LI By intersection it will ,_ traffic accidents. F~ ~eJ there were only three I U of acciden~ a second i il Hardware store drivel Illl l:J -15-iJ Two-Way Stop Control page I ot:l ~O-WAYSTOPCONTROLSUMMARY Generallnfonnation Site Infonnation Analyst Chris Valdez ntersection SSAlBumett Agency/Co. JTE, INC ~urisdiction Renton Date Performed 813112004 Analysis Year WdhProject Analysis Time Period PM peak Project Description Pa~s~eat95Bumett(SSABAS~) ~astIWest Street South Site Access !North/South Street Burnett Ave. S. ntersection Orientation: North-South IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 ~ehicle Volumes and Adjustments -"JorStreet Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 l T R l T R Volume 19 257 0 0 186 2 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 20 270 0 0 195 2 lPercent Heavy Vehicles 0 --0 -- ~edianType Undivided ~T Channelized 0 0 J.,anes 0 1 0 0 1 0 ~onfiguration LT TR ~pstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 l T R l T R ~olume 0 0 0 1 0 10 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 1 0 10 Pe~tHeavyVeh~s 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pe~t Grade (%) 0 / 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR Delay. Queue Length and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 lane Configuration LT LTR ~ (vph) 20 11 ~ (m) (vph) 1388 804 ~/c 0.01 0.01 ~5% queue length 0.04 0.04 Pontrol Delay 7.6 9.5 ~OS A A Approach Delay - -9.5 Approach lOS - -A > ([17 Copynght 0 2000 Umvemty ofFlonda. All Rights Reserved Vemon4.1c file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\Owner\Local%20Settings\ Temp\u2kI7F.tmp 9/1/2004 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Two-Way Stop Control Page loLL TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Generallnfonnation Site Infonnation Analyst Chris Valdez ntersection SSAlBumett Agency/Co. JTE, INC Jurisdiction Renton Date Performed 813112004 Analysis Year WdhProject Analysis Time Period PM peak Project Description Parkside at 95 Burnett (SSABASWP) East/West Street South Site Access !North/South Street" Burnett Ave. S. ntersection Orientation: North-South ISbJdy Period (hrs): 0.25 ~ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 l T R l T R lVolume 19 257 0 0 186 2 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Houriy Aow Rate, HFR 20 270 0 "0 195 2 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 - -0 -- Median Type Undivided [RT Channelized 0 0 banes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Gonfiguration LT TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 l T R l T R !Volume 0 0 0 1 0 10 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 ~ou~ Aow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 1 0 10 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 I 0 l=Iared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 lanes 0 0 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR Delay. Queue Lenatl1 and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ~ne Configuration LT LTR v (vph) 20 11 C (m) (vph) 1388 804 vIc 0.01 0.01 95% queue length 0.04 0.04 Control Delay 7.6 9.5 L.OS A A Approach Delay --9.5 ~proach lOS --A > <t17. .. Copyright C 2000 UDJYerSIty of Florida. All Rights Reserved Vemon4.1c file:IIC:\Documents%20and%20Settings\Owner\Local%20Settings\Temp\u2kl1F.tmp 9/112004 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I / Considering that these two estimates essentially range between the average and upper parking demands published by ITE, and that the maximum ITE rate is (78/92) about 85 . percent ofwhat is proposed, there is no reason to believe that a parking shortage will arise given the amount of on-site parldng being proposed. Accidents Accident data was obtained from the City of Renton Public Works Department files for the complete or full years record covering 2001, 2002, and 2003. The assembled accident data shows the following frequencies by location. TABLEID Accident Frequency by Intersection :It • Burnett Avenue S. at South 3td Street 8 «:::: • Burnett Avenue S. at South~ Street 4 <C:: • Burnett Avenue S. at 'South Tobin Street 0 • Williams Avenue S. at South 3td Street 14 • Williams Avenue S. at South 2m Street 15 • Williams Avenue S. at South Tobin Street 0 • Wells S. at South 3M Street 10 ..•. Wells Avenue S. at South ~ Street 30 • Logan Avenue S. at South ~ Street 25 • Logan/Smithers at South 3M street 4 • Morris Avenue S. at South 3M Street 8 • Whitworth Avenue S. at South 3nl Street 4 • Shattuck Avenue S. at South 3M Str~ 8 • Morris Avenue S. at South ~ Street 8 • Whitworth Avenue S. at South 2m Street 10 • Shattuck Avenue S. at South-Z» Street 9 * See~penalX for additional analysis based on the Control Chart Method with p = 0.95 By intersection it Will be seen that by the site at S. Tobin Street there were no recorded traffic accidents. Further, from S. tJtJ Street to S. Tobin Street on Burnett Avenue S. there were only three accidents over this same time period. On involved a sideswipe type of accident, a second was a right 8ng1e type (probably from one of the McLendon's Hardware store driveways), and a third involved a bicycle. -15-Christopher Brown fJ1 AMociate.t 9688 Rainier Ave. «S. &aWe. WA 98118-5981 Form WA-S (6/76) Commitment Face Page File No.: NCS-120492-WAl COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE Issued by FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY First American Title Insurance Company, herein called the Company, for valuable consideration, hereby commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance, as identified in Schedule A, in favor of the proposed Insured named in Schedule A, as owner or mortgagor of the estate or interest covered hereby in the land described or referred to in Schedule A, upon payment of the premiums and charges therefor; all subject to the provisions of Schedules A and B and to the Conditions and Stipulations hereof. This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the proposed Insured and the amount of the policy or policies committed for have been inserted in Schedule A hereof by the Company, either at the time of the issuance of the Commitment or by subsequent endorsement. This Commitment if preliminary to the issuance of such policy or policies of title insurance and all liability and obligations hereunder shall cease and terminate six (6) months after the effective date hereof or when the policy or policies committed for shall issue, whichever first occurs, provided that the failure to issue such policy or policies is not the fault of the Company. This Commitment shall not be valid or binding until countersigned by an authorized officer or agent. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this commitment to be signed and sealed, to become valid when countersigned by an authorized officer or agent of the Company, all in accordance with its By-Laws. This Commitment is effective as of the date shown in Schedule A as "Effective Date." First American Title Insurance Company By: AU~· President Attest: IJ1 ~ /-. ~ Secretary By: rr ~ Countersigned First American Title Insurance Company Form WA-S (6/76) Commitment File No.: NCS-120492-WAl Page No.1 To: First American Title Insurance Company National Commercial Services 2101 Fourth Avenue, Suite 800, Seattle, WA 98121 (206) 728-0400 -FAX (206) 448-6348 Laura Lau (206) 615-3017 lIau@firstam.com Colpitts Development 2256 38th Place East Seattle, WA 98112-2433 Attn: Rich or Dave SCHEDULE A Debbie McCleary (206) 615-3048 dmccleary@firstam.com File No.: NCS-120492-WA1 Your Ref No.: 1. Commitment Date: October 01, 2004 at 7:30 A.M. 2. Policy or Policies to be issued: AMOUNT PREMIUM TAX Refinance Rate ALTA Extended Mortgagees Coverage $ To follow $ $ Proposed Insured: To follow 3. The estate or interest in the land described on Page 2 herein is Fee Simple, and title thereto is at the effective date hereof vested in: Parkside at 95 Burnett, L.L.c., a Washington Limited Liability Company 4. The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows: The land referred to in this report is described in Exhibit A attached hereto. First American Title Insurance Company Form WA-S (6/76) Commitment LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Parcel A: EXHIBIT 'A' File No.: NCS-120492-WAl Page No.2 That portion of the donation land claim of Diana B. Smithers, family of Diana B. Tobin, a widow, and the heirs at law of Henry H. Tobin, deceased, deSignated as Claim No. 37 located in parts of Sections 17, 18 and 20 in Township 23 North, Range 5 East, Willamette Meridian, in King County, Washington, defined as follows: Beginning at a point 60 feet West of the Northwest corner of Block 24 of the Town of Renton, according to the plat thereof, recorded in Volume 1 of Plats, Page 135, in King County, Washington; Thence South 16.5 feet; Thence West 109.5 feet to the Northern Pacific Railroad right of way; Thence North along the East line of said right of way 300 feet; Thence East 109.5 feet; Thence South 283.5 feet to the point of beginning; Except the North 62 feet thereof. Parcel B: Parcel B of City of Renton Lot Line Adjustment No. LND-30-0278, recorded under Recording No. 20040413900018, records of King County, Washington. First American Title Insurance Company Form WA-S (6/76) Commitment SCHEDULE B -SECTION 1 REQUIREMENTS The following are the Requirements to be complied with: File No.: NCS-120492-WAl Page No.3 Item (A) Payment to or for the account of the Grantors or Mortgagors of the full consideration for the estate or interest to be insured. Item (6) Proper instrument(s) creating the estate or interest to be insured must be executed and duly filed for record. Item (C) Pay us the premiums, fees and charges for the policy. Item (D) You must tell us in writing the name of anyone not referred to in this Commitment who will get an interest in the land or who will make a loan on the land. We may then make additional requirements or exceptions SCHEDULE B -SECTION 2 GENERAL EXCEPTIONS The Policy or Policies to be issued will contain Exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company. A. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records. B. Any facts, rights, interest, or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of said land or by making inquiry of person in possession thereof. C. Easements, claims of easement or encumbrances which are not shown by the public records. D. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, or any other facts which a correct survey would disclose, and which are not shown by public records. E. (1) Unpatented mining claims; (2) reservations or exceptions in patents or in acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (3) Water rights, claims or title to water; whether or not the matters excepted under (1), (2) or (3) are shown by the public records; (4) Indian Tribal Codes or Regulations, Indian Treaty or Aboriginal Rights, including easements or equitable servitudes. F. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor, materials or medical assistance theretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. G. Any service, installation, connection, maintenance, construction, tap or reimbursement charges/costs for sewer, water, garbage or electricity. H. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgages thereon covered by this Commitment. First American Title Insurance Company Form WA-S (6/76) Commitment File No.: NCS-120492-WAl Page No.4 1. SCHEDULE B -SECTION 2 (continued) SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS General Taxes for the year 2004. Tax Account No.: 000720-0148-02 Amount Billed: $ 1,912.15 Amount Paid: $ 956.08 Amount Due: $ 956.07 Assessed Land Value: $ 165,700.00 Assessed Improvement Value: $ 0.00 Affects Parcel B General taxes for the year 2004 which have been paid. Tax Account No. 000720-0073-01 Amount: $3,602.84 Assessed Land Value: $312,700.00 Assessed Improvement Value: $0.00 Affects Parcel A 2. Deed of Trust and the terms and conditions thereof. Grantor/Trustor: Parkside at 95-Burnett, LLC Grantee/BenefiCiary: Chesterfield Mortgage Investors, Inc., a Washington Corporation Trustee: First American Title Insurance Company Amount: $1,237,500.00 Recorded: April 2, 2004 Recording Information: 20040402001247 Affects Parcel A We note numerous Assignments of Deed of Trust recorded executed by the Beneficiary above as Investment Manager for numerous investors. 3. Terms, conditions, provisions and stipulations of the Operating Agreement of Parkside at 95 Burnett, L.L.C.. According to said Agreement dated, Colpitts Development, LLC is/are the manager(s) thereof. Any amendments to said Agreement must be submitted. Any conveyance of encumbrance of the property must be executed by said manager(s) as provided for therein, subject to said amendments, if any. 4. Possible unrecorded lien rights, leaseholds, if any, rights of vendors and security agreements on personal property and rights of tenants, and secured parties to remove trade fixtures at the expiration of the term. A seller/borrower affidavit should be executed and submitted to us prior to closing for our review and approval. Note: All other matters regarding extended coverage have been cleared for the mortgagee's policy. Exceptions A through H shown in Schedule B herein will be omitted in said ALTA First American Title Insurance Company Form WA-S (6/76) Commitment File No.: NCS-120492-WAl Page No.5 Extended Coverage Mortgagee's Policy, subject to the exception set forth above. The coverage contemplated by this paragraph will not be afforded in any forthcoming Owner's Standard Coverage Policy to be issued. 5. Easement, including terms and provisions contained therein: Recording Information: 8406010541 In Favor of: City of Renton For: Public utilities Affects: Northerly 7.5 feet 6. Covenants, conditions, restrictions and/or easements: Recorded: July 14, 1976 Recording No.: 7607140468 INFORMATIONAL NOTES A. Effective January 1, 1997, and pursuant to amendment of Washington State Statutes relating to standardization of recorded documents, the following format and content requirements must be met. Failure to comply may result in rejection of the document by the recorder. B. Any sketch attached hereto is done so as a courtesy only and is not part of any title commitment or policy. It is furnished solely for the purpose of aSSisting in locating the premises and First American expressly disclaims any liability which may result from reliance made upon it. C. The description can be abbreviated as suggested below if necessary to meet standardization requirements. The full text of the description must appear in the document(s) to be insured. Parcel A -ptn Diana B. Smithers DLC #37 Parcel B -Parcel B, LLA 20040413900018 APN: 000720-0073-01 APN: 000720-0148-02 APN: 000720-0148-02 D. A fee will be charged upon the cancellation of this Commitment pursuant to the Washington State Insurance Code and the filed Rate Schedule of the Company. END OF SCHEDULE B First American Title Insurance Company Form WA-S (6/76) Commitment File No.: NCS-120492-WAl Page No.6 First American Title Insurance Company National Commercial Services COMMITMENT Conditions and Stipulations 1. The term "mortgage" when used herein shall include deed of trust, trust deed, or other security instrument. 2. If the proposed Insured has or acquires actual knowledge of a defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter affecting the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment, other than those shown in Schedule B hereof, and shall fail to disclose such knowledge to the Company in writing, the Company shall be relieved from liability for any loss or damage resulting from any act or reliance hereon to the extent the Company is prejudiced by failure to so disclose such knowledge. If the proposed Insured shall disclosure such knowledge to the Company, or if the Company otherwise acquires actual knowledge of any such defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter, the Company at its option, may amend Schedule B of this Commitment accordingly, but such amendment shall not relieve the Company from liability previously incurred pursuant to paragraph 3 of these Conditions and Stipulations. 3. Liability of the Company under this Commitment shall be only to the named proposed Insured and such parties included under the definition of Insured in the form of Policy or Policies committed for, and only for actual loss incurred in reliance hereon in undertaking in good faith (a) to comply with the requirements hereof, or (b) to eliminate exceptions shown in Schedule B, or (c) to acquire or create the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. In no event shall such liability exceed the amount stated in Schedule A for the Policy or Policies committed for and such liability is subject to the Insuring provisions, exclusion from coverage, and the Conditions and Stipulations of the form of Policy or Policies committed for in favor of the proposed Insured which are hereby incorporated by references, and are made a part of this Commitment except as expressly modified herein. 4. Any claim of loss or damage, whether or not based on negligence, and which arises out of the status of the title to the estate or interest or the lien of the Insured mortgage covered hereby or any action asserting such claim, shall be restricted to the provisions and Conditions and Stipulations of this Commitment. First American Title Insurance Company Form WA-S (6/76) Commitment The First American Corporation File No.: NCS-120492-WAl Page No, 7 First American Title Insurance Company National Commercial Services PRIVACY POUCY We Are Committed to Safeguarding Customer Information In order to better serve your needs now and in the future, we may ask you to provide us with certain information. We understand that you rnay be concerned about what we will do with such information particularly any personal or finandal information. We agree that you have a right to know how we will utilize the personal information you provide to us. Therefore, together with our parent company, The First American Corporation, we have adopted this Privacy Policy to govern the use and handling of your personal information. Applicability This Privacy Policy governs our use of the information which you provide to us. It does not govern the manner in which we may use information we have obtained from any other source, such as information obtained from a public record or from another person or entity. First American has also adopted broader guidelines that govern our use of personal information regardless of its source. First American calls these guidelines its Fair Information Values, a copy of which can be found on our website at www.firstam.com. Types of Information Depending upon which of our services you are utilizing, the types of nonpublic personal information that we may collect include: • Information we receive from you on applications, forms and in other communications to us, whether in writing, in person, by telephone or any other means; • Information about your transactions with us, our affiliated companies, or others; and' • Information we receive from a consumer reporting agency. Use of Information We request information from you for our own legitimate business purposes and not for the benefit of any nonaffiliated party. Therefore, we will not release your information to nonaffiliated parties except: (1) as necessary for us to provide the product or service you have requested of us; or (2) as permitted by law. We may, however, store such information indefinitely, including the period after which any customer relationship has ceased. Such information may be used for any internal purpose, such as quality control efforts or customer analysis. We may also provide all of the types of nonpublic personal information listed above to one or more of our affiliated companies. Such affiliated companies include financial service providers, such as title insurers, property and casualty insurers, and trust and investment advisory companies, or companies involved in real estate services, such as appraisal companies, home warranty companies, and escrow companies. Furthermore, we may also provide all the information we collect, as described above, to companies that perform marketing services on our behalf, on behalf of our affiliated companies, or to other financial institutions with whom we or our affiliated companies have joint marketing agreements. Former Customers Even if you are no longer our customer, our Privacy Policy will continue to apply to you. Confidentiality and Security We will use our best efforts to ensure that no unauthorized parties have access to any of your information. We restrict access to non public personal information about you to those individuals and entities who need to know that information to provide products or services to you. We will use our best efforts to train and oversee our employees and agents to ensure that your information will be handled responsibly and in accordance with this Privacy Policy and First American's Fair Information Values. We currently maintain physical, electroniC, and procedural safeguards that comply with federal regulations to guard your non public personal information. c 2001 The First American Corporation -All Rights Reserved First American ntle Insurance Company I 11. AFfER RECORDING MAIL TO Parkslde at 95 Burnett, LLC 2256 38th Place East Seattle, WA 98112 Attn . Judith Colpttts Nielsen Flied for Record at Request of First American Title Insurance Company Nabonal Commercial Services 20040421002347.001 1IIIIflllllllili 20040421002347 FIRST ArlERlCAN LID 21 00 ~l OF 083 14/21/28M 115 12 ICING COUNTY. IJ~ E2032702 84/21/2884 115.82 KING COUNTY, UA TAX S5 128 50 SALE $282 : see ee PAGE001 OF 001 ,< ~"'." FiIStA' Tit' .," _ .-:..... mencan l&ie ..a~dS_ Insurance Company lSTAM ~4Z1- SfATUTORY WARRANTY DEED ljJl/",Z' . File No NC5-41462-WAl (II) Date: March 29, 2004 THE GRANTOR{S) Beverly :I. Starkovich, Trustee of Rudy l. Starkovich Credit Trust U/A dated October 9, 2001, as to a 50% interest; and Beverly J. starkovich, Trustee of the Starkovich Revocable Trust U/A/D June 15, 2001, as to the remainder for and m consideration of Ten Dollars and other Good and Valuable Consideration, In hand paId, oonveys, and warrants to Parkside at 95 Burnett, LLC, a Washington limited liability company, the following descnbed real estate, Situated In the County of Kmg, State of Washington SEE ATrACHED EXHIBIT 'A' FOR LEGAL DESCRIPTION WHICH IS MADE A PART HERETO BY ntIS REFERENCE. Assessor's Tax Parcel No{s).: 000720-0148-02 and a Portion of 000720-0148-02 SubJect To ThIs conveyance IS subject to covenants, conditIons, restnctlons and easements, If any, affecting btle, whICh may appear In the public reoord, Indudlng those shown on any recorded plat or survey. Page 1 of2 lPB-IO 7/97 VESTING .. APN 000720-0075-09 Statutory Warranty Deed -contlJlued Beverly J StarkoVich, Trustee of Rudy J StarkoVich Credit Trust utA dated October 9, 2001, as to a 50% mterest, and Beverly J StarkoVich, Trustee of the StarkoVich Revocable Trust utAID June 15,2001. as to the remamder ~~ Beverly J S oVlch, Trustee Sf ATE OF Washington ) )-55 COUNlY OF Kmg ) 20040421002347.002 File No NC5-41462-WAl (II) Date 03/29/2004 I cerbfy that I know or have satISfactory eVJdence that Beverly' 1. Starkovi~e the person{s) who appeared before me, and said person(s) acknowledged th:uu~; Slg~nstrument, on oath stated that h~ey rsjare authonzed to execute the I d aknowledged It as the Trustee of Beverly J."Siift«wich, Trustee of Rudy J. Starkovich Credit Trust U/ A dated October 9, 2001, as to a 50% interest; and Beverty J. Starkovich, T~f the Starkovich Revocable Trust IJ/A/D June 15, 2001, as to the remainder to be the f~~voluntary act of ~ party(leS) for the uses and purposes mentioned In thIS Instrument Dated, ~ 1Ie,u &{ -_ .... , ..... ", ...:---::e>.. S LA "\\ .::' • ,"" 0 •• 0 •• 0 lJ \ • ." ~. N.. 'l ~v .• "-:"'fQ\O ~.. tt ,.:~ z·o' * i lo,t-.RY ~... ~ ~ ;0 ~-"..-~: ~ ~ ~o _to.\'F' : "I. , "0 yvv-"' :~ ~ #.. g;;: if! t. s·.. 4_,\Ill.ss ••• .-..: ~ , •• J ,.-~'" '\ ........ ~~-~ \" OF'lNII-C3.E ''''''''''---- Page 2 of2 Notary PublIC In a Resn:hng at: Seattle My appoliltment expIres' Apnl 1, 2004 IJ>B-l0 7/97 ~ EXHmIT'A' (Legal Description) 20040421002347.003 PARCEL B OF CI1Y OF RENTON LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. LND-30-(}278, RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 20040413900018, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON " ~.. 20040402001246.001 III IIII~IIIIIII 200 0402001246 AFTER RECORDING MAIL TO' ColpItts Development Co 2256 38th Place East Seattle, WA 98112 FlRST AftiRJCAN WD 21 It PAGEtIS OF 1ft Attn' Judith NIelsen Flied for RecOrd at Request of First Amencan Title Insurance Company Nabonal Commeraal Servtces 84/12128e4 14.23 KING COUNTY. WA E2029078 M/N/28M 14: 22 KING COUNTY UA TAX .IJI;ses.81 SALE S7Z5. eo ee "'t ,,'t .. t,,. ~ STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED File No: NCS-41471-WAl (II) PAGEee1 OF eel First American Title Insurance Company If-1411-Ta @ ISTAM--B Date, April ,sf, 2004 THE GRANTOR(S) Philip Maitland Lande, as his separate estate for and In consIderation of I.R.C. Section .1031 Tax Deferred Exchange, In hand paid, conveys, and warrants to Parkside at 95- Bumett,LLC, a Washington Umited Uability Company, the fOlloWIng described real estate, situated In the County rX King, State of Washington. That portion of the donation land daim of Diana B. Smithers, family of Diana B. Tobin, a widow, and the heirs at law of Henry H. Tobin, deceased, designated as Oaim No. 37 located in parts of Sections 17, 18 and 20 in Township 23 North, Range 5 East, Willamette Meridian, in King County, Washington, defined as follows: Beginning at a point 60 feet West of the Northwest comer of Block 24 of the Town of Renton, according to the plat thereof, recorded in Volume 1 of Plats, Page 135, in King County, Washington; Thence South 16.5 feet; Thence West 109.5 feet to the Northern Pacific Railroad right of way; Thence North along the East Dne of said right of way 300 feet; Thence East 109.5 feet; Thence South 283.5 feet to the point of beginning; Except the North 62 feet thereof. Assessor's Tax Parcel No(s).: 00720007301 Subject To· ThIS conveyance IS subJect to covenants, condItions, restncbons and easements, If any, affecting tttle, whIch may appear In the public record, including those shown on any recorded plat or survey. Page 1 of2 LPB-l0 7/97 VESTING ., '" 20040402001246.002 APN 000720-0073-01 Statutory Warranty Deed -conbnued FIle No NCS-41471-WAl (II) Date 03/08/2004 PhIlip MaItland Lande mYl1 By Phlhp Maitland Lande STATE OF Washmgton ) )--ss COUNTY OF King ) I certIfy t. hat I know or have satisfactory evidence that Philip =" Lan..(.;; ... the person(s) who appeared before me~Jd person(s) acknowledged tha el f!'I ~IS Instrument and acknOwledged II: to h r/thelr free and voluntary act fip e uses and purposes menboned In thIS Instrument. • . Dated: ~ 1/6t"""". \OOi1i!J=-_-.") UY.1e III --~; , -.s. ~ "'\'\.\\\tt1 I -G ,~' ."" " " :!l: --tti... I" "'-I ; ~ f~~~~J "o'~ ~ ~ , ., : Oj~ .~~. Z ~ ~ \ \ ~1~~!} ~ ~ " ",A..... _. _ .a.~:' I' I ~ I 1,1:'trNP ~... -i>. , , .. "\\\",,-,,... A. -"~I, ~'\lOa _---'\ 4.«:1 , .... \,\"', ....... Page 2 of2 Notary P~UMc a for ~~e~tate of Washington ResIdIng at: ().J.fI My appol 7i:;~ LPB-10 7{97 2. -:; 20040402001247.001 When recorded return to Chesterfteld Mortgage Investors, Inc 1001-4111 Avenue Plaza, SUite 3313 Seattle, WA 98154 'II\~III'JIII fmL.M'lERtCAN DT· &Z ee ,4iU7ie= reu . KINO C:QUIIITY, U~ CMI Loan #2208 ParksJele at 95-Bumett, LLC 4141,-TOl ID ISf .AtllJj"",-~ DEED OF TRUST WITH ASSIGNMENT OF RENTS Grantor(s) PARKSIDE AT 95-BURNETT, llC, a Washington limited liability company Trustee FlRST AMERICAN nnE INSURANCE COMPANY Grantee/BenefiCiary CHESTERFielD MORTGAGE INVESTORS, INC, a Washington corporalJon Legal descnpbon (abbreviated -fuU legal shown below) Secbon 17,18, and 20 Township 23 North Range S.East. Tax Parcel(s): #000720-0073-01 THIS DEED OF TRUST. made thIS 30th day of March, 2004, between PARKSIDE AT 95- BURNETT, LLC, a Washmgton 11I1l1te<! liability company, ("Grantor;. whose address IS 2256 -3811> Place East, SeatUe, WA 98112, ARST AMffilCAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY ("Trustee"). whose address IS 2101 Fourth Ave, Suite 800, Seattle, WA 98121, and CHESTERFIElD MORTGAGE INVESTORS, INC, a Washmgton corporabon ("BeneflClary1, whose address IS 1001 -4111 Avenue Plaza, SUite 3313, Seattle, Washington 98154 WITNESSETH Grantor hereby urevocably grants, bargains, seilS and conveys to Trustee In trust. with power of sale, the following descnbed real property m Kmg Courlty, Washmgton Description of real property: See attached Extllbit "A" WhICh real property IS not used pnnClpal1y or at all for agnculture purposes, together With all the tenements, hereditaments, and appurtenances now or hereafter thereunto belonging or In any WISe appertaining. and the rents, ISSUes and profits thereof ThIS Deed of Trust IS for the purpose of secunng performance of each agreement of Grantor herein contallled, and. paYment of the sum of ONE MIWON TWO HUNDRED THIRTY~SEVEN THOUSAND AVE HUNDRED N0I100 DOLLARS ($1,237,500 00) WIth Interest, In accordance WIth the terms of a promlSsoiy note and loan appllcabon of even date herewrih, payable to Beneficiary or order, and i"riade by Grantor, and an renewalS, modmcabons and eXtensions thereof, and also such further sums as may be advanced or loaned by BenefiCiary to Grantor, or arrf of their successors or aSSIgns, together With Interest thereon at such rate as shall be agreed upon . To protect the secunty of thIS Deed of Trust, Grantor covenants and agrees 1 To keep the property In good condition and repair, to permit no waste thereof. to complete any bulldmg, structure or Improvement being bUilt or about to be budt thereon, to restore promptly any building, structure or mprovement thereon whICh may be damaged or destroyed, and to comply With all laws, orchnances, regulations, covenants condtbons and restrictions affecbng the property 2 To pay before de~nquent all lawful taxes and assessments upon the property, to keep the property free and clear of an other charges, hens or encumbrances unpalnng the security of thiS Deed of Trust, and not to seD, enter mto a contract of sale. convey, alienate, transfer or encumber any of Grantors Interest In the property 3 To keep all bulldmgs now or hereafter erected on the property descnbed herem continuously Insured agalllstioss by fire or other hazards In an amount not less than the total debt secured by thiS Deed of Trust All polICIes shall be held by BenefiCIary, and be In such companIeS as BenefICIary may approve and have toss payable hrst to Beneflctary, as Its Interest may appear, and then to Grantor Q::--__ . Imtlal Inrtlal Page 1 of4 20040402001247.002 The amount collected under any inSurance policy may be applied upon any Indebtedness hereby secured In such order, as Beneflctary shall determine Such appltcabon by BenefIClSI)' shaH not cause dlSCOnbnuance of any proceedings to foreclose thIS Deed of Trust In the event of foreclosure, all nghts of Grantor In Insurance polICIes then In force shall pass to the purchaser at the foreclosure safe 4 To defend any actIOn or proceeding purporting to affect the secunty hereof or the nghtJ; or powers of BenefiCIary or Trustee, and to pay all costs and expenses, Including cost of trtIe search and attorneys' fees In a reasOnable amount, In any such actJon or ~Ing, and \0 any SUIt brought by Beneflaary to foreclose this Deed of Trust 5 To pay all costs, fees and expenses In connecbon WIth thIS Deed of Trust. Including the expenses of Trustee Incurred In enforang the obllgSbon secured hereby and Trustee's and attomey's fees actually Incurred, as provided by statute 6 Should Grantor fad to pay when due any taxes, assessments, lIlSurance premiUms, IIElnS, encumbrances or other charges agalnst.the property heremabove descnbed, Beneficiary may pay the same, and the amount so paid, WJth Interest at the rate setforlh m the note secured hereby, shall be added to and become a part of the debt secured by thIS Deed of Trust IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED THAT 1 In the event any portion of the property IS taken or damaged In an eminent domain proceeding, the entire amount of the award or such porbon as may be necessary to fully sabsfy the obltgatlon secured hereby, shall be paid to BenefrClary to be applied to saKi obligation 2 By accepbng payment of any sum secured herebfafter Its due date, Beneficiary does not walYe Its nght to reqUire prompt payment when due of all other sums so secured or to declare default for fadure to so pay 3 Trustee shall reconvey all or any part of the property covered by thIS Deed of Trust to the person enbtled thereto on wntten request of Grantor and Beneficiary, or upon sabsfactJon of the oblrgabon secured and wntten request for reconveyance made by Beneftcrary 4 Upon default by Grantor In the payment of any mdebtedoess secured hereby or In the performance of any agreement contained herem, or upon the safe of, execution of a contract of sale for, convevance of, abenabon of, transfer of or unposrtJon of any encumbrance upon Grantor's Interest In the property descnbed herern, all sums secured hereby sballlmmedJately become due and payable at the option of BenefJcaary In such event and upon wnIten request of BenefiCIary, Trustee shaH sell the property descRbed herem, m accordance WJth the Deed of Trust Ad. of the Slate of Washington, at publIC aUCbon to the highest bidder Any person except Trustee may bid at Trustee's safe Trustee shall apply the proceeds of the sale as follows . (1) to the expense of the sale, Includmg reasonable Trustee's fees and attorney's fees, (2) to the obltgabon secured by thIS .Deed of Trust, (3) the surplus, If any, shall be chstnbUted to the persons entrtled thei"eto 5 Trustee shaH delIVer to the purchaser at the sale lis deed, WIthout warranty, which shaH convey to the purchaser the Interest In the property which Grantor had or had the power to convey at the bme of Grantor's execubon of thiS Deed of Trust, and such as Grantor may have acqutred thereafter Trustee's deed shall recite the faels shOWIng that the sale was conducted In complrance WIth an the reqUirements of law and.o1 thIS Deed of Trust, whICh reatal shaH be pnma facre eVidence of such compliance and conclUSIVe eVIdence thereof m favor of bona fide purchaser and encumbrances for value 6 the power of safe conferred by thIS Deed of Trust In not an exclUSIVe remedy, Beneficrary may cause thIS. Deed of Trust to be foreclosed as a mortgage . 7 8eneficrary may. from bme to broe. as provtded by slatute. appomt another trustee In place of trustee herein named, and thereupon trustee herem named shan be discharged and the trustee 50 appollited shall be substrtuted as trustee hereunder, With the same effect as If oogmally named trustee herem Trustee IS not Obligated to notify any party hereto of pending sale urKier any other deed of trust or of any aebon or proceeding In which Granlor, Trustee or BenefICIaI}' shalf be a party unless such actton or proceeding IS brought by Trustee 6 ThIS Deed of Trust appltes to, mures to the benefit of, and IS blndmg not only on the parnes hereto, but on their hetrs, devrsees, legatees, adminIstrators, executors, successors and assigns The term BenefiCIaI}' shaD mean the holder and Owner of the note secured hereby, whether or not named as BenefiCIary herein 9 Grantor hereby grants, assigns, transfers, and conveys to BenefiCiary all of Grantor's ngh!, tItle and Interest In and to all leases, now or hereafter made, demISing aU or any portion of the premISeS descnbed In the Deed ofTrust (the .property") 9~ -Inlbal InrtlaI Page 2 of4 " 20040402001247.003 TOGETHER WITH any and al\ guarantees of lessee's obbgatJons under the Leases, and any and all amendments, modlficabonS, renewals, replacements and extensIOns thereof, TOGETHER WITH aD rents, UlCOme and profits now or hereafter due or to whICh Grantor may now or hen!after become enbtled, ansmg from or out of the Leases or from or out of the Property, TOGETHER WITH aD deposits of every kind, mcludlng WIthout i1mJlabon secunty, cleaning and damage deposits, and all other securIty received by Grantor under or WIth respect to Leases (a) So long as there shall exJst no default by Grantor In the payment of the Indebtedness under thIS Deed of Trust and the Promlssoty Note of even date, Grantor shaD have the .nght under a license granted hereby to collect, but not pnor to acx:rual, all rents anslng from or out of the Leases or from or out of the Property or any porton thereof, pl'OVlded that all rents so conectedby It shall be applied first to pay the usual and reasonable operating expenses of, and the taxes upon the Property, and then to pay an sums OWIng BenefiCIary as they become due and payable under the terms of the Prormssory Note and Deed of Trust. and the balance of such rents, after payment of the foregOIng, shall be Grantor's absolute property (b) Upon or at any trme after default mlhe payment of any Indebtedness OWIng under the Prormssory Note and Deed of Trust, Benefictary may, at Its optron and WIthout no~, terminate the lICense granted to Grantor hereunder, and may proceed, either In. person or by agent, to collect all rents ansmg from or under the Leases or from or out of the Property (c) Upon the payment m fuU of the PromISSOry Note and of all Indebtedness secured by thiS Deed of Trust, thiS 8SSIQnment shan be VOId and have no further force and effect GRANTOR(S) PARKSIDE AT 95-BURNETT. LLC a WashIngton hmlted lrabdrty company By Co/pitts Development, LLC a Washmgton IImlled babdrty company Its member and Manager By~~.L- Jud eolPiiiSlelsen. Manager . STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING I certJfy that I know or have sabsfactory evrdence that JUDY COLPITTS NIELSEN IS the person who appeared before me, and sard person acknowledged that SHE srgned ttus mstrument and on oath stated that SHE IS authOnzed to execute the Instrument and acknowledged It as the MANAGER OF COLPITIS DEVELOPMENT, lie. to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes menboned m the Instrument Dated Notary PiJbllc In Resldmg at J<evJH~ My apPolOtment exprres=:' -0 J ..... *'"..\~" , .... ;,.0 tA. Hv':;-", f~~-;~j~\ : ,fit! .OTAR., 'f,.'~ ~ I fo .--I ~ ,,~ ,c :;d \ ...... PuS\,: io~ Page 3 of4 ~ ........ '.... ..-1;;.: ",~ ..... .l-1.~<;~ E ~'~ ••••••• "4~--.... .or: w,..t:,'..:·-~ ,. 20040402001247.004 REQUEst FOR FULL RECONVEYANCE The undersigned beneficiary IS the legal owner and holder of the prorrussory note In the onglnal sum of ONE MILLION TWO HUNDRED THIRTY-SEVEN THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED NO/100 DOLLARS ($1,2l7,5oo 00). secured by that certain Deed ofTruat dated March 30, 2004, 10 whICh PARKSIDE AT 95- BURNETT, LLC, a Washmgton bmlted lIabllrty company, Grantor(s), and FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY IS Trustee,and flied for record on , under reoordlll9 number > records of King County, Washington The note and aD other Indebtedness secured by said Deed of Trust haVIng been fully sabsfied. the Note and Deed of Trust are herewrth surrendered to you for canceHabon and reconveyance You are therefore requested, upon payment of all sums OWIng to you, to reconvey WIthout warranty, to the person(s) entrtled thereto, the nght, bUe, and Interest now held by you hereunder Dated ___ -'--__ CHESTERFIELD MORTGAGE INVESTORS, INC ~----------------- Page4of4 ... 20040402001247.005 EXHIBIT 'A' LEGAL DESCRImON: That portion of the donabon land clam of Diana B. Smithers, farmly of Diana B. Tobin, a WIdow, and the heirs at law of Henry H. Tobm, deceased, designated as Claim No. 37 located ttl parts ofSed:lons V, 18 and 20 m Township 23 North, Range 5 East, Wlllamette Mendlan, III KIIlg County, Washington, defined as follows: BeglJmng at a poUlt 60 feet West of the NorthweSt comer of Block 24 of the Town of Renton, according to the plat thereof, recorded In Volume 1 of Plats, Page 135, In KIng County, WasfllngtDni Thence South 16.5 feet; . Thence Wf!St 109.5 feet to the Northem Pacific Railroad right of way, Thence North along the East )me of said nght of way 300 feet; Thence East 109.5 feet; Then<;e South 283.5 feet to the point of begInning; Except the North 62 feet thereof. 2 ./ When Recorded Return to Chesterfield Mortgage Investors. Inc 1001.-4111 Ave,Ste 3313 Seattle. WA98154 eM! Loan #2208 Parkslde at 95--Burnett, LLC Assignment of Deed of Trust 20040402001248.001 III q'l\ll-"~ ID lSTAM-S For Value ReceJVed, the undersigned as BenefiCIary, hereby grants, conveys, assigns and transfers to CHESTERFIELD MORTGAGE INVESTORS, INC AS INVESTMENT MANAGER. FOR SFI FUNDING, LLC, as to a 100 00 percent mterest, whose address 18 1001 -41& Ave, Ste 3313, Seattle WA 98154, all beneficial mterest under tbatcertam Deed of Trust dated Marcb 30, 2004. executed by P ARKSIDE AT 95-BURNETT, LLC. a Washmgton Jumted hablbty company, Grantor, to FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, Trustee, and recorded on Apn12, 2004, tmder Recording numberJ6ottQq{l1. f!Jo la-V. Records of KIng County, Washmgton, descnbmg land therem as DescrIption of real property: See attached Exhibit "A" Tax Parcel(s)' #000720-0073-01 Together Wlth note or notes therem descl"lbed or referred to, the money due and to become due thereon, Wlth Interest. and all nghts accrued or to accrue under S81d Deed of Trust Dated Apnll, 2004 Chesterfield Mortgage Investors, Inc Edward M Hunter, Vice Prest State ofWaslnngton ) County ofKmg ) ss ':'"" "~"""'\.\. .-.-;:Ul. (.,~ -!>-'-. 0 I, ;0('..') • , .. ~, V'' .. • {.> .I/V (-. '/L It "'~ (,.:; " .... '.~ .. ' '. n I '" ., 10' --,u I " ,0 \'l [',H'I':>-~ ~ '---.• , ~, "I ' , " '; ,OUt LIe : I 1.).... • ". I. ~ t~..,,, t\~ ,~.;' 'I'/>... .; ~-\; .. ..<'-J __ '<;"~' ". 0'· ", O":!o '''--\~ _' \\ y", ~p --\\",,." ...... ~-- I certify that I know or have sabsfactory eVldence that EDWARD M HuNTER. IS the person who appeared before me, and saId person acknowledged that (be) Signed tIns tnstrument, on oath stated that (he IS) autbonzed to execute the mslrument and acknowledged It as the VICE PRESIDENT OF CHESTERFIELD MORTGAGE INVESTORS, INC, to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentIOned ill thIS mstrument ./ ... 2004040200124'8.002 EXHIBIT 'A' l.EGAL DESCRlP1l0N: That portlon of the donabon land claim of Diana B. Smrthers, family of Drana 8. Tobin, a Widow, and the heirs at Jaw of Henry H. Tobin, deceased, designated as Claim No. 37 located III paris of Sections V, 18 and 20 III Township 23 North; Range 5 East, Willamette Menthan, In KIng ColUlty, washtngton, defined as foIows: Begmnl1g at a pomt 60 feet West of the Northwest corner of Block 24 of the Town of Renton, aa::ordlllg tn the platthereof, recorded In Volume 1 of Plats, Page 135, In King County, Washington, TIlenc2 SOuth 16.5 feet; 1'hence West l09.Sfeet to the Northern Pacific Railroad right ofway; Thence North along the east bne of said nght of way 300 feet; Thence East 109.5 feet; . Thence South 283.S feet to the point of beginning; Except the North 62 feet thereof. 1. ~ 20040415001967.001 , 1111111111111111 20040415001967· When Recorded Return to Chesterfield Mortgage Investors, Inc lOOI-4dl Ave,Ste 3313 Seattle, WA 98154 CMI Loan #2208 ParksIde at 9S-Burnett, LLC FIRST AnERlCAN ADT 18 •• PAGE .. t OF 102 04/115/2104 115. at KING COUNTY, UA Assignment of Deed of.Trust 4l4'"11-""~ ~ 1ST AM For Value Recel~ the undersigned as BeneficIary, hereby grants, conveys, assigns and transfers to CHEsTERFIELD MORTGAGE INVESTORS, INC AS INVESTMENT MANAGER FOR GARY L PETERSEN AND ELIZABETH M PETERSEN, JOINT TENANTS WITH RIGHT OF SURVIVORSHIP, as to a 8 081 percent mterest, whose address IS 1001-4th Ave, Ste 3313, Seattle WA 98154, all benefiCIal Interest under that certam Deed of Trust dated March 30, 2004, executed by PARKSIDE AT 95-BURNETT, LLC, a Wasrungton lumted hablhty company, Grantor, to FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, Trustee, and recorded on Apnl2. 2004, under Recordmg number 20040402001247, Records ofK.mg County, Washmgton, descnbmg land therem as Descnpbon of real property: See attached exhIbIt "AU Tax Parcel(s): #000720-0073-01 Together With note or notes therem descnbed or referred to, the money due and to become due thereon, WIth mterest, and all nghts accrued or to accrue under wd Deed of Trust Dated Apnl1, 2004 State of Washmgton County ofKmg ) ) ss -_ ...... -............. ,","-\" --;:: Ll" 1"0" -~'~ '-~ ~\ .f oC;) c..'::"O,\; ~ {q \ ~ Q;" •• ,if'-'", (;"} i, f a \~():. I I () ~ ~ " I fl( /r-,_ ~ " ,0. ~ ;: " -~ s ~'~j ,I' /,:J-.:;- " ~ • ")J' -\\\\O~Wt-S\"\\~ _---\,,", ....... "---- I certlfy that I know or have sansfactory eVidence that EDWARD M HUNTER IS the person who appeared before me, and saId person acknowledged that (he) sIgned thIS mstrument, on oath stated that (he IS) authonzed to execute the Instrument and acknowledged It as the VICE PRESIDENT OF CHESTERFIELD MORTGAGE INVESTORS • . INC , to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned m thIS Instrument v~ Notary Public In Resldmg at ~ v_. '..... . o=t: My appomtmtnt expires 5 -2.. q - ,,-,. ... LEGAL DESCRIPlION: 20040416001967.002 EXHIBIT 'A' lhat portion of the donatIon land daJm of DIana B. Smithers, famDy of Diana 8. TobIn. a widow, and the heirs at law of Henry H. Tobin, deceased, designated as Claim No. '5llocated In parts of Sections V, 18 and 20 In Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W11lamette Mertdlan, In KIng County, washington, defined as follows: Beginning at a point 60 feet West of the Northwest comer of Block 24 of the Town· of Renton, accontJng to the plat thereof, ~rded In Volume 1 of PJats, Page 135, In KIng County, Washington; Thence South 16.5 feet; Thence West 109.5 feet tD the Northern Paclftc Railroad right of way; • Thence North along the East hne of said nght of way 300 feet; ThenoeEast 109.5 feetj Thence South 283.5 feet to the point of beginning; EXcept the North 62 feet thereof. 2 20040429001761.001 ~ When Recorded Return to \1111"1111111111 20040429001761 FIRST AI'IERI~ ADT til ell PA~l OF te2 84/29/2014 11 31 Chesterfield Mortgage Investors, Inc -1001-4& Ave, Ste 3313 KING COUNTY. lolA Seattle. WA 98154 CMI Loan #2208 Parkslde at 95-Bumett, LLC (.f(\ ql'ii, ~/O Assignment of Deed ofTI1l$t For Value Received, the underSlgned as BeneficIary, hereby grants, conveys, asSIgns and transfers to CHESTERFIELD MORTGAGE INVESTORS, INC AS INVESTMENT MANAGER FOR KIEHL FAMILY TRUST,HARRYA KIEHL, TRUSTEE, as to a 16162percentmterestandBRUCEA BURRIS,astoa8081 percent mterest, whose address IS 1001 -4th Ave, Ste 3313, Seattle WA 98154, all benefiCial mterest under that certam Deed of Trust dated March 30, 2004, executed by PARKSIDE AT 95-BURNETI, LLC, a Washmgton hffilted ltabllity company, Grantor, to FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPAl\TY, Trustee. and recorded on Apn12, 2004, under Recordmg number 20040402001247, Records ofKmg County, Washmgton. descnbmg land therem as Description of real property: See attached exhibit "A" Tax ParceJ(s):#O00120-0073-01 Together Wlth note oenotes therem descnbed or referred to, the money due and to become due thereon, WIth mterest, and all nghts accrued or to accrue under satd Deed of Trust Dated Apnl23, 2004 By <~I'.{-~ . Edward M Hunter, VIce Presl' State ofWashmgton County of King ) ) ss ----:--': ... ,' '\\\ --(:.L,,!l,~ .t. ;-S:;. -'-~t'\ -0 c.::: L),,-.. ~ I ;. ,t... .. ~,... ... _..... ~" : ;:'~ • .(,-I,~) (. ;. / -, " J' I _ I' I ~,j_:~. :: : ',~ ~ ':>...:-I "1'.».. u <'9-0!.. 0: .;' I, .<-~ •••••• , c.~ _ \ O":-WA~\~ __ ':- \ , .... '-""'-'- I certify that I know or have satIsfactory eVIdence that EOW ARD M HUNTER IS the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that (he) Slgned thIs IDstrument, on oath stated that (he IS) authonzed to execute the mstrument and acknowledged It as the VICE PRESIDENT OF CHESTERFIELD MORTGAGE INVESTORS, INC , to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentIoned m thIS mstrument NotaryPubhc In an~. ReSldmg at • £ Myappomtmenfexplr, .• /- ThIs instrument filed for record by First American Title Insurance Company As an accommodation only, Jt has not Been examined as to its execution or As to its effect upon the btle 20040429001761.002 ~ .. EXHIBIT 'A' LEGAL DESCRIPTION: That portion of the donation land claim of Diana B. SmJthers, faml1y of DIana B. Tobin, a widow, and the heirs at law of Henry H. Tobin, deceased, designated as Claim No. ~ located In paris of sections 17, 18 and 20 In TownShIp 23 North, Range 5 East, W11lamette MeridIan, In KIng County, WashIngton, defined as follows: Beglnmng at a point 60 feet West of the Northwest comer of Block 24 of the Town of Renton, according to the . plat thereof, recorded In Volume 1 of Plats, Page 135, In lOng County, Washington; Thence South 16.5 feet; Thence west 109.5 feet to the Northern Pacific Railroad right of way; . Thence North along the East hne of said right of way 300 feet; Thence East 109.5 feet; Therim South 283.5 feet to the point of beglnnlng; Except the North 62 feet thereof. 2 .... When Recorded Return to Chesterfield MOltgage Investors, Inc 1001· 4th Ave, Ste 3313 Seattle, WA 98154 CM! Loan #2208 Parkslde at 95-Burnett, LLC 20040507000105.001 \1""""""'" 20040507000105 FIRST Al'l£RlCAN AOT 11 00 ~'l~-05/07~~ 19 46 KING "UYR' Y, UA ASSJgoment of Deed of Trust For Value ReceIved, the undersigned as BenefiClal)'. hereby grants, conveys, asSIgns and transfers to CHES'I'ERFIELD MORTGAGE INVESTORS, INC AS INVESTMENT MANAGER for Investors bsted on Exhlblt ''X', attached. whose address IS 1001-41A Ave. Ste 3313. Seattle WA 98154, all beneficIal mterest under that certaIn Deed of Trust dated March 30, 2004, executed by P ARKSIDE AT 95-BURNETT. LLC, a Waslnngton IImlted babihty company. Grantor, to FIRST AMERICAN 1TfLE INSURANCE COMPANY, Trustee. and recorded on Apn12. 2004, under Recordmg number 20040402001247, Records of Kmg County, Washington. descnhmg land therem as Description of real property: See attached Exhibit "AU Tax Parcel(s): ##000720-0073-01 Together With note 01 notes therem descrIbed or referred to, the money due and to become due thereon, wlth mterest, and all nghts accrued or to accrue under said Deed of Trust Dated May 3, 2004 Chesterfield M~ge I~es~Inc By ~ /'1'-LZ- Edward M Hunter, Vice PresIde State of Wash mgt on ) County of Kmg ) ss --_ ..... :,.,",'\ ----€:LllI. ('0\\\1 -~~. </ I, ~ 0 ',SSiOlv r-'~', "J')C; • ~ '"/-. v ,. ..... :~ -c (jl I, ~ "0 NOTJ,f.?; ~ ~ -: • (J '-.-. r~ J' I w I' ,. ,cU6UC ; " lJ) '" 'I ~A· S'.?p.O.l. r:Y.:f t. '<.<-' •• G~- • \ \ \\~""WAS\-l,\~ __ ..;- ",,', ...... ' I certlfy that I know or havesutlsfactory eVidence that EDWARD M HUNTER IS the person who appeared before me, and saId person acknowledged that (he) SIgned thIS mstrument, on oath stated that (he IS) authonzed to execute the Instrument and acknowledged It as the VICE PRESIDENT OF CHESTERFIELD MORTGAGE INVESTORS, INC, to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned In thIS mstrument Notary Pubhc 10 arid ~ Resldmg at , • ~ My appomtment rxPlfeS --- ihlt Instrument filed for record by First AmerIcan Title Insurance Company M an accommodation only, It haS not aeon examined as to Its execution or As to Ita effect upon the title -20040507000105.002 =#2208 -Parkslde at 95-Burnett, LLC EXHIBIT "Z" ATTACHED TO THE CERTAIN ASSIGNMENT DATED May 3. 2004 CLlENTNAME AS TO THE FOLLOWING % ROBERT C HINES, JR AND CHRISTY A HINES 0445 THE JESSICA REASY IRREVOCABLE TRUST, LORRAINE REASY, TRUSTEE 2021 CHARLES F REASY AND LORRAINE M REASY, TRUSTEES, OR THEIR 2021 SUCCESSORS IN TRUST, UNDER THE REASY UVING TRUST, DATED FEBRUARY 10, 1997, AND ANY AMENDMENTS THERETO ... I 20040507000105.003 \0 EXHIBn'A' LEGAL DESCRIP1l0N: That portion of the donation land claim of Diana 8. Smithers, famBy of DIana B. Tobin, a widow, and the heirs at law of HenryH. Tobrn, deceased, designated as Claim No. 37 located In parts of Sections V, 16 and 20 In TownShIp 23 North, Range S East, Wllamette Meridian, In King County, Washington, defined as follows: Beginning at B pofnt 60 feet \tVest of the Northwest comer of Block 24 of the Town of Renton, according to the plat ttlereof, recorded In Vo!unle 1 of Plats, Page 135, In KIng County, Washlngtonj Thence South 16.5 feet; Thence West 109.5 feet to the Northern Pacific RaBroad right of way; • Thence North along the East line of said rfght of way 300 feet; Thence East 109.5 feet; Thence South 283.5 feet to the point of beglnnlngj Except the North 62 feet thereof. 2 \ 20040527001857.001 When Recorded Return to IIIIIII111111111 20040527001857 Chesterfield Mortgage Investors, Inc 1001 -41h Ave, Ste 3313 SCattle, WA 98154 CMI Loan #2208 Parkslde at 95-Burnett, LLC FIRST APlERICAN AST 11 ee PAGEe01 OF 803 ./Z7/Z0e4 13:3& KING COUNTY I 1M Assignment of Deed of Trust tfl'fll0 For Value ReceIVed, the underl>1gned as BenefIcIary. hereby grants, conveys, assigns and transfers to CHESTERFIELD MORTGAGE INVESTORS, INC AS INVESTMENT MANAGER for Investors hsted on Exfublt '7:', attached. whose address IS 1001 -4th Ave. Ste 3313, Seaule WA 98154. all beneficIal mterest under that certam Deed of Trust dated March 30, 2004, executed by PARKSIDE AT 95-BURNETf. LLC, a Washmgton blWted bablbty company, Grantor; to FIRST AMERICAN TITLKINSURANCE COMPANY. Trustee. and recorded on Apnl2, 2004, under Recordmg number 20040402001247. Records ofK1Og County. Washmgton, descnbmg land therem as l)escnptlon ofreal property: See attached exhibit "An Tax Parcel(s)' #000720-0073-01 Together Wlth note or notes therem descnbed or referred to, the money due and to become due thereon, WIth mterest, and all nghts accrued or to accrue under srud Deed of Trust Dated May 26, 2004 By c .... ¢A~ (I"{. w== Edward M Hunter, VIce Presldenl State of Waslungton County of Kmg ) ) 55 --_ ...... """',,'\ --~l·' .... \, . --'C-''"' '-0_ \\ ;-("~\>-,.., , <'( \ I ... 6--' ~~ ~ , ~ I ,: I'>C • ~'"::'-: -"', ./ '<. • """ ~ ~ I , • :s; ,,'c ~I ' r:--::. , / -0 ~ ~~ I -; I' , I ~ " ~ P'.-I,' " I -J:.J_ -: I ~'), ~ .,-II ~ ~', .." '-~ ... t 1h .;:.!; \. r~'-~ 1 '0'~ --..\0' ~ \\ v;: P'AS~\\\ _--',---' ... ,' ..... "~--- I certify that I know or have sabsfactory eVidence that EDWARD M HUNTER IS the person who appeared before me, and srud person acknowledged that (he) slgned thiS mstrument, on oath stated tbat (he IS) authorized to execute the mstrument and acknowledged It as the VICE PRESIDENT OF CHESTERFIELD MORTGAGE INVESTORS. INC , to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes menuoned lD thIS mstrument 20040527001857.002 #2208 -Parkslde at 95-Burnett, ILC EXHIBIT "Z" ATTACHED TO THE CERTAIN ASSIGNMENT DATED May 26,2004 CLIENT NAME JAMES F CARLSON AND UL Y M CARLSON MAXH OWEN THE VICKI LEE CAMPBELL SECOND IRREVOCABLE LIVING mUST AGREEMENT DATED 6/4/01 GARY M CUMMINGS and SHIRlEY CUMMINGS AS TO THE FOLLOWING % 20203 3233 6061 12125 ~ " 20040527001857.003 EXHmlT'A' LEGAL DESCRIP110N: That portion of the donation land claim of Diana B. Smlthefs, family of Diana B. Tobin, a widow, and the heirs at law of Henry H.Tobin,deceased, designated as Claim No. ~ located In parts of Sections 17, 18 and 20 In Township 23 North, Range 5 East, WlUamette Meridian, In lOng County, Washington, defined as foHows: BegInning at a point 60 feet West of the Northwest comer of Block 24 of the Town of Renton, accorchng to the plat thereof, recorded In Volume 1 of Plats, Page 135, In lOng County, Washington; Thence South 16.5 feet; . The~ West 109.5 feet to the Northern Pacific RaHroad right otway; . Thence North along the East line of said right of way 300 feet; Thence East 109.5 feet; . Thena! South 283.5 feet to the point of beginning; Except the North 62 feet the~. 2 ~ When Recorded Return to Chesterfield Mortgage Investors, Inc IOOI-4th Ave, Ste 3313 Seattle, WA 98154 CMI Loan #2208 Parks Ide at 95-Bumett. LLC 20040604000328.001 --1111111111111111 20040604000328 FIRST AI'IERICAN ADT 11 18 PAGE .. , OF 113 86/14/2004 es 45 RING COUNTY. lolA Assignment of Deed of Trust .~,. For Value Received, the undersigned as Beneficiary, hereby grants, conveys, assigns and transfers to C1:ffiSTERFIELD MORTGAGE INVESTORS, INC AS INVESlMENT MANAGER for Investors hsted on Exhibit "Z", attached, whose address IS lQOl -4th Ave, Ste 3313, Seattle WA98I54, all beneficial mterest under that certam Deed of Trust oated March 30, 2004, executed by PARKSIDE AT 95-BURNETT. LLC, a Washmgton hrlllted habthty company, Grantor, to FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY. Trustee. and recorded on Apnl2. 2004, under Recording number 2004040200 1247, Records ofKmg County, Washmgton, descnbmg land therein as Descripbon of real property: See attached Exhibit "A" Tax Parcel(s): #000720-0073-01 Together WIth note or notes therem descnbed or referred to, the money due and to become due thereon, With mterest, and al1 nghts accrued or to accrue under said Deed of Trust __ -:::-"""" . _--\:.LlA ('0 "~I Dated May21,2004 By ~"~'k/ Edward M Hunter, VIce Preslden State ofWashtngton County ofKtng ) ) ss -S?-'. ~(II j' 0 .' ~tOS\OIV!!' ~ I, .... ~.~ '+.() (pI : t NOTARy "5l.. I, ~ () -.~ ~ ~ I. v. I I OUauc 1 I, dJ>. .... 'I ~h. s~29_\)ll. -&'.J' ',.~~. ~ -~\, OF"WAS\-\\~ _: \\"""" ...... -- J cemiY that I know or have satISfactOry eVIdence that EDWARD M HUNTER IS the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that (he) Signed thiS Instrument, on oath stated that (he IS) authorIZed to execute the Instrument and acknowledged It as the VICE PRESIDENT OF CHESTERFIELD MORTGAGE INVESTORS. INC, to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentJoned m thIS mstrument ~ '- 20040604000328.002 #2208 -ParkSlde at 95-Burnett. LLC EXHIBIT "Z" ATTACHED TO THE CERTAIN ASSIGNMENT DATED May 21. 2004 CLIENT NAME EQUITY TRUST COMPANY CUSTODIAN FOR THE BENEFIT OF HUGH THOMAS JR, IRA NELSONB DAVIS DEBORAH T OVE DON PAGE LAURA VANSLYKE, CUSTODIAN FOR HANNAH J ELAIMY CHRISTINE GILLES CLARIS ASTOTIIE FOLLOWING % 038 24245 5253] 2021 00405 04014 4 20040604000328.003 -:.. EXHIBrr'A' ....... ".,." .. . LEGALDESCRIPllON: That portion of the donauon land dalm of Diana B. Smithers, famHy of Diana 8. Tobin, a widow, and the heirs at law of Henry H. Tobin, deceased, desfgnated as Oalm No. 37 located In parts of Sections 17, 18 and 20 In Township 23 North, Range 5 ~ WIlIamette Meridian, In KIng County, WashfngtDn, defined as foUaws: Beglnrmg at a point 60 feet West of the ~ comer of Block 24 of the Town of Renton, according to the plat thereof, recorded In Volume 1 of Plats, Page :135, In KIng County, Washlngtoni Thence SoUth 16.5 feet; Thence West 109.5 feet to the Northem Pacific Railroad rIght of WilY; • Thence Nortb a'ongthe East /Ine of said rfght of way 300 feet; Thence East 109.5 feet; . Thence South 283.5 feet to the point of beginning; Except the North 62 feet thereof. . 2 -~ When Recorded Return to Chesterfield Mortgage Investors, Inc 1001-4'" Ave, Ste 3313 Seattle, W A 98154 20040610001300.001 1111111111111111 20040610001300 FIRST AneRlCAN FlDT 11 8e PAGE801 OF 883 06/18/2004 11 5& KING COUNTY, LlA CMI Loan #2208 Parkslde at 95-Burnett, LLC ASSlgnment of Deed of Trust C!f4IJr- For Value Received, the undersigned as BeneficUU}', hereby grants, conveys, assigns and transfers to CHESTERFIELD MORTGAGE INVESTORS, INC AS INVESTMENT MANAGER for Investors lISted on Exhtblt "Z", attached, whose address IS 1001 -41h Ave. Ste 3313, Seattie WA 98154, all beneficlallTiterest under that certam Deed of Trust dated March 30,2004, executed by P ARKSIDE AT 95-~URNETT. LLC, a Washington hnuted hablbty company, Grantor, to FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, Trustee, and recorded on Apn12, 2004, under Recordmg number 20040402001247, Records ofKmg County, WashIngton, descnbmg land therem as Descnptlon of real property. See attached Exhibit "A" Tax Parce\(s): #000720-0073-01 Together Wlth note or notes therein descnbed or referred to, the money due and to become due thereon, With IQterest, and all nghts aeerued or to accrue under srud Deed of Trust Dated Jtnle 8, 2004 ROS}" --' ' C(' Chesterfield Mortgage Investors, Inc By~/J1 Edward M Hunter, Vice PreSl NO ~ J,. :. . . . • J STA1_'" ~ I ,)1 ,,' ~~ I ~I't I CO~\I t" ,~" ~;lO~ EX~;olr\t....S \ '-___ ,., <\ '( 2S 2C08: v-v---r. ~.~ ~ .. '-,"'-~4 State of Wash mgt on ) County ofKmg ) ss I certify that I know or have satISfactory eVidence that EDWARD M HUNTER IS the person who appeared before me, and saId person acknowledged that (he) Signed thls mstrument. on oath stated that (he IS) authonzed to execute the Instrument and acknowledged It as the VICE PRESIDENT OF CHESTERFIELD MORTGAGE INVESTORS, INC , to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentIoned 10 thiS mstrument Dated fR I B 104-e> ~£k(~ Notary Pubhc 10 Resldmgat _,..2!.~~2..:b}"-L-=-...,...,,~..-- My appomtment expIres _~~!..-lL...L-__ 20040610001300.002 ;r :.. #2208 -Parkslde at 95-Burnett, LLC EXHmIT"Z" A TIACHED TO THE CERTAIN ASSIGNMENT DATED June 8, 2004 CLIENT NAME VERMEULEN FAMILY LLC ADRIAN VERMEULEN AND JOSEPHINE J VERMEULEN KEVIN COSENS AS TO THE FOLLOWING % 3233 8081 8081 20040610001300.003 ;-.. EXHIBIT 'A' LEGAL DESCRlPlION: That portion of the donation land claim of DIana B. Smithers, family of DIana B. Tobin, a widow, and the heirs at law ofHenty H. Tobin, deceased, designated as Cfalm No. 37 located In parts ofSecUons 17, 18 and 20 In Township 23 North, Range 5 East, WIIIamette MerIdIan, In KIng CoWlty, WashlngtDn, deflned as foUows: Beginning at a point 60 feet West oftl:1e Northwest comer of Block 24 of the Town of Renton, according to the plat thereof, recorded In Volume 1 of Plats, Page 135, In KIng County, Washington; Thence South 16.5 feet; Thence west 109.5 feet to the Northern Pacific Railroad right of way; • Thence North along the East Une of said right of way 300 feet; . TheJ1(~ East 109;5 feet; Thence South 283.5 feet to the point of beginning; Except the North 62 feet thereof. 2 ~ \ \. W~en Recorded Return to: Chesterfield Mortgage Investors. Inc. 1001-4111 Ave., Ste. 3313 Seattle, WA 98154 ~?'Vril ADT 11.ee 89/17/2084 12:49 KING COUNTY. UA CMI Loan #2208 Parkside 'at 95-Bumett, LLC Assignment of Deed of Trost 20040917001197.001 For Value Received. the undersigned as Beneficiary, hereby grants, conveys, assigns and transfers to CHESTERFIELD MORTGAGE INVESTORS, INC. AS INVESTMENT MANAGER FORDA VID W. ROOK ANDVICKJ. ROOK. ITWRS, as to a 5.387618$86 percent interest, whose address is 1001· 4'" Ave., Ste.3313. Seattle W A 98154, all beneficial interest under that certain Deed of Trust dated March 30, 2004, executed by PARKSIDE AT 95-BURNE'IT, LLC, a Washington limited liability company. Grantor, to FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, Trustee, and recorded on April 2, 2004, under Recording number 20040402001247, Records of King County. Washington, describing land therein as: Description of real property: See attach~d Exhibit "A" Tax Parcel{s): #O0071~073-Ol FIRST AMERICAN y \L-\J \1 ... "\ ~ ,PD . :i . Together with note or notes therein described or referred to, the money due and to become due thereon, with interest, and all rights' accrued or to accrue under said Deed ofTrusl Dated: September 15, 2004 State of Washington ) County of King ) ss. ROSA B.IA COlliNS NOTARY PUBLIC STAlE OF WASHINGTON COMMISSION EXPIRES MAY 29. 2008 I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Charles M. Chesterfield is tile person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that (he) sign~d this instrument, on oath stated that (he is) aUthorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the PRESIDENT OF CHESTERFIELD MORTGAGE INVESTORS. INC_, to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in this instrument. Dated: . g---iS-of _ mfk,G4k . Notary Public In an ort e S te of Washington Residing at _~Ci\I~c:...J.~--:--:---;--I- My appointmen expires _...L.--!'::::.::...!.--"'''-l._.__ 'i 20040917001197.002 '- ~.~ EXHIBIT'A' LEGAL DESCRJP1l0N: That porUon of the donatfon land claim of Diana B. Smithers, family of Diana B. Tobin, a wIdow, and.1he heirs at law of Henry H. TobJn, deceased, designated as Claim No. 37 located In parts of SedJons V, 18 and 20 rn Township 23 North; Range 5 East, Wllamette MeridIan, In King County, WashIngton, deflnedas foRows: 8egfnnlllg at a point 60 feet West of the Northwest comer of Block 24 of the Town of Renton, according to the plat thereof, recorded In Volume 1 of Plats, Page 135, In KJng County, Washington; . .. Theme South 16.5 feet; .Thence·West 109.5 feet to the Northem Paclftc Railroad right of Wily; • ~lhence North along the East Ifne of saId right of way 3()O feet; . Thence East 109.5 feet; Thence South 283.5 feet to the point of beginning; Except the North 62 feet thereof. 5 '::> . " <;;.~c :,',_." ; ~. ".:. <c' ..;: ':,,=+'-~:':'" .~" ", '.';;'." ~ ~ " ~~~ 6 .' . " ...... : . :,.:.::: ,:' ,"1,· .' ~ ".:~'.~.~~~~~.~~" .. ~z.,·~·~~_ :~':' ...... -,. ...... _.;,.. ........ , ... , -i j , . ...... f· 0; ,00 «> ~ o . ~ -' r- O. (.0 r- . -' .::,}.,:.,";", ... f~),'t:':1.~\;:;: " , .. STAT17rORY VAlUlA5TiDDD :',;"':" for. aDd in colialderation of Ten Dollars ($10.00) in ha1rdpaid. coilveys;~':);ai-i'8DtB':-;' to RUDY J.STAlIIOVICB and BEVERLY J. STJJIrOVICB. hll8baDd and wife. the toU~'; '. described real property. situated in the CoUllty of King, State of VaaliJ.D3tO!1l . . ,.r." Beginn1Dg ata point on .the Ea.t~ly llna of die l!tOrthern Paeiff.c: lIaU':.;: road right-of-way wh1ch point is West 169.5 feet aDd 'North 283.5 feet><"':" frolll the Northwest eorner of Lot I, Blod 24. Towuof ll.enton, accorcl1Jig": to .the plat recorded in VollDa 1 of Plats, pap 135, in Ung County,,;,:, .• ),: . Washington; thence running Northerly along .. idEasterlY right-of-v&Y::·;'·:/~.::.: line 216.5 feet; thenee at right angles Easurl,'109.S feet to a point' .. iii the Westerly 111le of Burnett Street, extended; thene.e South'!rly a],oDi, .... said WesterlyllDe of Burnett Street ~teDded ,216.5 feet;: thenee Vester.!y::.',.,: ·109.5 feet to the point of beg:1nnlns,' all of wh1Cblf.es between the·.; ... · . :.: ·.'i .• ' Easterly right-of-way line of the Northein' Pacific: Railroad aDel the . Westerly line of Burnett Street exteDded aild is part of the original Henry H. Tobin Donation Clam No. 37, TOVD8hip23:North, Range 5, East. V.H., in King County, Vashington.· . . .' c'" . EXCEPTDiC AND RESERVDiC TO GRAirroR,its 'suc:cesaors aDelassigns. gaB and other hydrocarbons, geothermal. reaource.. and all o$r lIlinerals.:WJleaaer 's1ill1lar to thoseberef.n specified or not, vlth1n .l!r;~t,lIIIlYbe pro4ueedA~C!I!i:,sa1d . .'~:: . real property;.prav1ded~ however. that aU'rights and:,intereat.1n the's . ,sa.id .real property are lIereby comreyed to Grantu,;;ju{t:tiht, ~.intereat '!ti1Id'iouae the surface. expressed or1lllPUed.~~~ept·i!d Orre,' . . Grantor;aDd provided' furtlier that Grantoraha1i;·DOt;-':'in·'aerds1lig CJO linyth1ugvh1chWf.ll dailage the. ilurfaceof;."ld'!iw.::;Prope~y:cir! thereou •. :sDd 8hall.notconduct any dr1l1i11g cir ,o~\~~rat1inis . t.he ~1rBt five hUndred (5OQ) f~tbe1ov~:8u:z:~~to;(, " . :/";: <"".>";'.' "."' .. ;.. . .' ...... ; . .':::~~;:t{/i~·\~~;t¥~:.~: . .' .·:AlIDPUImlER UCEPTllIGAHD RESERVDG;lO,Q.\It.OR. 8s~1inil~tbe sOle and' exelusive right ' fromtilA~::tcf'diie' weUaGrotberworlta into or through addrU! FGPer.ti niadB 8ud highways belovadepth of Uvehulidre.t ·<1nject.storeancl remove fr~ and through webw and. otheraubstaneeS . of wau: ... c.· A.st':'ce, illclUi:m: the Ei:-~~to perfc~ beloW . ~idde,th any and all operations deemed by Grantoriieces&ary or convenient' for th •• exerei&e·of 'Such rights. '. . . Thls conveyanee is . subject to all matters. appearing of reeoyd or,thit'" can b.e asc:ertalned by an inspect10n ofssid rial property. '. . IN \IlINESS WHEREOF. said corporat1on ha~caused thls Instrument to be :executed b!, 1tsproper officers and its corporate seal to. be hereunto affixed . th1s 24th day of June, 1976. . ··oa.' ~:~: ~f~~~~-1i h·· .' ...... un ____ - STANDARD OIL ~HPANY OF CALIFORNIA ... ~ -'.'.' By·4f~ ~e1'l::es1dent =-: ~ .... 'i "i~;'r: e 1 t·~ . '. .: It· ~ > " .: .. ~ .~.. :-: . .....,---:< --~ ': •.. " .:: I·· .. ~.:~~~ci;G:;z+.:~~ '.-... --... ...,. ...... ~- l: i ci~Y. a~d CQW\ty 01'. San' 'F~~s.~~.L;"; ." , r\'>'''~: '~;~<:~~':''-~S~i';~~t%:~J.l .. ,bdore me, t.heimd~r~1P1~d, a' NotarY Public .••.. ~ •. ' .1n'llnd"for:the C~t~ .. c~,~~~!,f.S3.Iilran.··&"o. State or Califor!l • dl1~y C:o:r.'iItss1o~.cd "~'. and &"JOrn" perr:onallY ap.Ptt~rid";.~~.· p.. to Ir.e .ltno-.tnto be hereto aft'b:ed .theday.and year tnthis ~;.:,iT':~\ .. '., "f'_" .Aj ;< .... I:.:.t·~~~~·;·:.;~ ,." ;~'":'EDMON(j:(EE:;'i(£l(Y t ED:>1mm LF:E KEU.t f .' ·:~~~·.'~-:-~··/iiK~~}f!OTA!tY:;'~~C~LlFOIINIA ~ Notary Public in and for the t1ty and ~ .' ... .., •• f;~ ~,}>-...... ~ .~;.~ITl.M:'O~I!~ ... lh OF .' f County of San Francisco, State of .~ T" 'rm\l' .~. .' ...... '. ',~ fRArl~ISCo .' f California f . . 1 M, Commi$5icn Expires J .... 22. 1980 ~ re~idin& at San Francisco ::: ). .... -... ----"W~~r~""1"'~"" ... -<''"''~ w f .. . r. "{ " ~ . I ':,,;. ".; ::; .. ', .. -'.':; .. ~: ',;:;.;'{; •. ')';'S,:" ~:~nl """': .:;,.':; ?iJ,~~~~ ,}~,~'+'j:>3~ o~s rllt ~I ;in '" " .' ,', . ~;~N;~~(;~;':;~l. :~T[:~'":~:::. ~;, qYI(') / ., ....... , ''') ~a-;zt7'; 1;0)\,0110 ..... .,·. ~' ---£~ -----.. -.. . rr-,r;l. . G .~ .... :It ,.,.,.. ....... . '>_.' ....... . %~:. NOTICE This Sketch is furnished as a courtesy orily by First American Title . Insuc8nce Company and it is NOT a part or'any title commitment or policy of title insurance. '. This Sketch i~ furniShed solely;for tbe purpose of assisting in locating the~ises and does nQt purport to show all highways. .' roads, 0(" ~enls affectirig th~ prQperty. No, n~liance sh9ti14 be place4 . upoll.this sketch for the lOcation or~mensiol\S. ~f the :: prG~y .au<1·!lOiUdt~w.ris ~edfor th~,!<~~~~c:r~t.. .' ~. -J:~:" ~~ ~ '7S J .. ' .. Il :'1 -.. . ~ '-. ~I ,,<}. • t>~ • It.· ' .• I I~ • '.oc.~ ;)5 Pftl, Xo;':; 1_40 ."[::Jche~ X~.fs; r-.... .. ~!~ ... ~: ~. "''ll • :~ t'1Q CII .... ·0 1~""1ti§ ~I~ ~~~i1l>~ ~./l{ ill~!I!"!i! i'" --~~~; , ~ (> I~ .... ~ ,.. .~.: '".:,. .. _., .: .. ~.,;. ~ .. " ~~ ~~ » i ~ ~'1: "Ie C C,. ,,'''~f+ .......q~ N •.. .'. ••••••••••• "u-1Q. I . i~;7 ~"::... '~w. ~;~ ~ / ,/C" • ., "":~ CJ • o ORDER NO. / 2. 04' r 2-' SUBOIVISION.~ __ ">:~~ ___ _ REC'ti°30L &PG.·,_ ._------ QTR ~ SEC i 2?' TWP U RNG S .-- i' .' I 1.' __ -;""'/L..!:. __ :.':·h ~y... ":. of .... ~" i-e;!i! t-, ""'ZO'.,.. , .:. ~~~E! I \ \ :, ""':~'-_ ~ljr,-:~ _ _ .... ., ,,~tI ' :.. ~1{~·}j ":;; :.f I .f(:"'~:::"" . ,~'--) "'""'Ill' '" ~l i~,.O)I '. . <as;:l, .. ' ,. i.:'" ;-"', \... !~ I .. ~§~li ." ·\.~§iiJg ., "':c,:.:" /. ~~ "., j:/ I.:§.: .. J i~= ... :,,:" :'::::::. ~'lil . .:" §~ FlJ i! I.:''');:~,,::- !II .. ''''' '~'&""ts>.. ..' ~l ~, , ~ -1 " .. , "'.J':" Q i'1i~ii<' ... ~ .... ,: .. ,<~ ~~ ~ j \ /:"'-.f'~,' ~>!. l;!;,. "', < 'i! -... ~ Ii: ",-'Q. :' ~,: "'. ~; "~ ~~.. ~ "1<l' .lO, .lO". ~l 1 ':h.: ". "'<itS'!.! ~2 '1>.'l:1o~ D !S _ I ~ '.:;.\ ; iii' , .,,,,e,, • ~''' .. ,.... P;);'" '. '. I . '-:. ~ ... M-' z "'?,?,y l; .... ~ :"~ . .I ....... ~ . o,..n=oS ..... -1 .. " ~ •• ~ ... ,. . ---, ~ """ S~., i .. %-':. "? ~ .,' .: y,";'~"J2" ' ,,1i I.,>«,o"~' ~._. _'.. ~""'-==/:" . ~I~ ~. Ga>· z ?. 1O~ <'. ,u. 'VCII'f sr. . -Iii ~""'A "2r,~ A • :c", "". 1 "'. ". .::'::' ..... ~., ,"< .;;:. ~;;~~,J ""., ~i .... '}:. '\;' 0"0." '''fi3~ I I ~:, "':'::;:;'1:1"';>: ~S!, ':' .. , [i>.ll{~ .... s.~. S ':. JO;:~~ NEW :-. ..... ~ ", I .. :~:.... ~::~ ~& ... . :.:. . " ~ 8 ~ 'r LOT LINE ..... ',:. .' ~ { .. :..... \ if~~ ',----------. '. ':::.' .,. '..:'1 ~" ", • o~~~ '--""""'''''''09.,(1' ..... , \ll f' .", ,::, If ./ (.,) .,J I" -: • '-~ ~\:""~·":-"·'lL:,j "i~i~ ',. ~. r ' '0.. ,~~,~ ' .. ', I, ! i ,1·:., I i IJ ":,\~);~,.,:",,,' 1<::" '~~y ':, .. / ... : I 'OO .,:--.... 1 .:' .' ' .. ,. ~ ": .. ~.' ," "\ 'il'/', ·~~:o "-:" '3 2 -·.01-(J~' 10 ,2.0,,.cOQ .. ~ I I<) .. ~ n (I, • .. . "1 ? ., .. ~::.,: ./,::' . iff' ::~ \ ' .~: . ;;1;' / '6/ R ... i'" .. $CCO~~ ;~z...-------'-.L..---: ___ -c;:=-::---l CH-·. 3. -. t:· I -~ • .tIZ: '" ... , >-'\ ~( > .... , ( .... " !i !1 "". <..> .::. <. I ,~ ',-.... '" " ~ j; p \ U~':~~'\) .. ".,.: ~ ,i .. 0 ".. ,.... I .~ -Ia ,,~~ '1~:. :.: .. 0 "'" " 'c::t '!It;li. :;; ,~'~'-~ :.' '-. . ,;}. ... ,./ ~ ~;,~tY~Ji~"';.·.~-"'~~ -.~- .. ~ .......... )'r. .(. ~ ;:·~f:·· .. ~1 ,; ;' . ----'...: .. ~; -.;~~j ...... - .. ,l· : ~ >"~r"j .i. .-:;Xt,' _ ....... -;'}; .. ~-~:.: ,~ o Scale 1u = 20' 10 20 30 40 Tree Tree DBH Height Spread/ LCR Condition # Sp (In) (ft) Dripline (%) Ratirlfl Tree Condition Notes/lrTl[l<lcts 1 CULE Removed 2 CULE Removed 3 PSME 8 25 10 75 1 Very !lood conditionlcrown could be affected 4 PSME 10 25 15 75 1 Very good condition/crown could be affected 5 PSME 13 35 20 70 1 Very good condition/crown could be affected 6 PSME 8 25 10 75 1 Very good condition/crown could be affected 7 CULE 19 35 20 90 1 Very good condition/crown could be affected 8 CULE 15 30 20 90 1 Very good condition/crown could be affected 9 CULE 14 30 20 90 1 Very good condition/crown could be affected 10 CULE 14 35 20 90 1 Very good condition/crown could be affected 11 PSME 1 1 35 15 80 1 Very !lood condition/crown could be affected 12 PSME 8 20 10 75 1 Very !lood condition/crown could be affected 13 PSME 10 35 15 75 1 Very !lood condition/crown could be affected 14 PINI 11 20 15 75 1 Very !lood condition/crown could be affected 15 PINI 10 20 15 75 1 Very !lood condition/crown could be affected 16 PINI 20 30 22 80 1 Very !lood condition/crown could be affected 17 PINI Removed 18 PINI Removed 19 PINI Removed 20 PINI 17 20 22 75 1 Very !load condition/crown could be affected 21 PINI 14 20 17 80 1 Very !load condition/crown could be affected 22 PIN I 14 25 20 80 1 Very !lood condition/crown could be affected 23 PIN I 15 25 20 80 1 Vel}'Jlood condition/crown could be affected 24 ACRU Removed 25 CULE Removed 26 CULE 22 35 25 85 1 Very !lood condition/crown could be effected 27 PSME 15 35 30 70 1 Very !lood condition/crown could be affected 28 PSME 16 35 30 70 1 Very good condition/crown could be affected 29 PSME 14 30 30 75 1 Very good condition/no impacts noted .. Tree # -Number of tree as Identified on the accompanYing map Tree Sp -Tree species tricode ACRU~Acer rubrum (red maple) CULE~x Cupressocyparis leylandii (Leyland Cypress) PINI~Pinus nigra (Austrian pine) PSME~Pseudotsuga menziesii (Douglas fir) Dbh -Diameter in inches at 4.5' above the existing grade Height -Approximate height of tree in feet Spread/Dripline -Maximum crown spread/dripline diameter in feet LCR (Live crown ratio) -The percentage of trunk area/length with live branch material. LCR values less than 35 are considered low. , . I : w--- ----- " "----"- RETAIN/ REMOVE RETAIN RETAIN RETAIN RETAIN RETAIN RETAIN RETAIN RETAIN RETAIN RETAIN RETAIN RETAIN RETAIN RETAIN RETAIN RETAIN RETAIN RETAIN RETAIN RETAIN RETAIN RETAIN Condition Rating -An arbitrary value relating to the condition and hazard potential of the tre~ based upon health and defects, and assuming presence of a target 1 -Excellent condition 2 -Good condition 3 -Fair condition, retention allowed provided impacts aren't extensive 3.5 -Fair health, however conditions may warrant removal 4 -Poor condition, removal recommended Tree Condition Notes -Specific information on condition of the evaluated tree )' , . ' -; ! (, ')0' #1 #2 TREE CONDITION EVALUATION AND IMPA~CT MAP Parkside at 95 Burnett #7 I . . . ~ , Renton, WA -, I f J.,l· " Ii Ii r I I I I b I ,~ I .~ co :?; ;.j .--'" N co '-c z ,-:;, l() : "~ " , '00' i <-J I .-cr· '" r:) ~"l I z; I , #16 ------ NO! JO'!WE #8 #12-#20. "-'- Arboricultural Consulting Tony Shoffner Consulting Arborist, Horticulturist ISA Certified Arborist #PN-0909 Member, American Society of Consulting Arborists PO Box l35 Mountlake Terrace, WA 98043-0l35 Phone and Fax: (425) 776-0850 Mobile (206)755-2871 email: arboricultural.consu\ting@verizon.net "I .. . i . : I 'I , .. . 23 " .-". 1 I , . , "' , #24 , . 25-#2 I i i I' , , , , ,! [_I ': TREE EVALUATION AND IMPACT MAP PARKS/DE AT BURNETT 95 I Sreet #L-l.2 Drte: October 18, 2004 ~nthony V. Shoffner_ CITY OF RENTON, WA Colpitts Development Company, LLC 2256 38th PI. East Seattle, WA 98112 DEVE)_OPME!~-( iJLANi\JINO CITY 0[·-Hr:!'J rON OCT;: 5 2U04 , ::. , ,., I: .. , ')~ l~iA Certified Arborist #PN-0909A; Member, American Society of Consulting Arborists r-, ... :~-,,-« " ~ ....... (/) Date: By: Descriptiort .............................................. . ............ . '----- "" f·' \ ,'.'F._" ..... '_"._I_'~''''! l I l , ,.,i" , .j " : 1 .' , ,~ i' \, i ." ,"",~~"<\,-.. ,~""".",,, , , , , , ~'''' ,~-"-,, "~-~1 ,-',,, \:, I ,I: ·r"'"·~~" ~"~,~", .. ,,-,"-' .. '.'-.,., "" .. ".,." ~~ _V""."' ',.., c .... "\"<~_~ o.,~·,~,~".;.,-,' .. _" ,_., '''''''''''", "', ... )- ... ~, _~" """'r"'_C,,.-",-.", .. ' ~~), ,,,..,,,,,...,,.,'" ,'''''' S"loa'N'Sl ,. . NEIGHBORHOOD MAP SCALE: 1:100 Parkside at 95 Burnett Colpitts Development Co. LLC. Renton,WA r-- ~. . t-·· . I "-4 ,' ..... ~~. '..-.- . . ,. .~ • to. "'t t ! :! h--. !.i '. -- . , ,-,>1', ~.- .' ;:Ii ,,' : " j~ TSA I arc hit e c t S, p.llc. 50 116rh Avenue S.E. Suite 201 BclIcvuc, WA 98004 T 425.401.6828 F 425.401.0630 www.tsaatchitcets.com NEIGHBORHOOD MAP SHEEr NO. A1.0 200327 Ifl r- "-.. .~ . "t-J LUJ EXI5T. FI~ HYDRANT I ~ L ---------- 0:) I 0:) '" ··················--ss--I "y' ' • .-. >~'--T ~-";"""'" --·--------·--·--·--·--·--·--·--~--~--·-I , "'I ' 216.50' : ~.!. : j j I ;;.1 ," : "';'} I " r I ' ,}. I 'T I ' -} I ; I I .:-I I . '" I 1 "-6 1 1':':-: IS' SAN SEUIER E5MNT ~CORDING • !I4,*,1D1~41 : I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I NO 1 'JO '48"[ 216.50.:... _. __ . __ . -.~.'.~.~.'.~.~.'.~.~ ... ~.~.'.~ . .,.1..'.~ .. . -. -:-:-. -:-:-.'. -:-:-. -:-:-... -:-:-. -:-:-... -:-. -:-:-. ' ...... ;: V . . ....... . '5: 61RR. @T. o LANDSCAPING IRR vALVE i IlJATER VAULT I i Date: By Descr\:ltiort ~ro , REGISTERED ARCH!~T ~ .~ ... ~ / .. ' 1/ "7 K~e-sr ATE i= WASHING-TON - -'=- /1 I I I I I I • I ~ 0; C> i" ~I ~ ~I I I I BURNETT AVENUE SOUTH NOI'JO'48"[ __ __ ~ • • ~ , B CITY FARK LANDSCAFNCi! . ' 322'-8' PROPOSED BUILDING ~ 1tc:lRr OVER etF 'EHT ,. u;va&_TIAL <MR 2 JJMa& P_""" LOWER GARAGE F.F.: 32.5' LANDSCAPING BURNETT PLACE SOUTH SITE PLAN SCALE: 1:212) Parkside at 95 Colpitts Development Co. LLC. ;n I~~ T EXIST. FIRE HYDRAN \ \ --@--o Burnett '., I . I . c:l(lH I I I I I 1'-5~' LANDSCARNG I . I I .~ 10; C> - !~ I~ 1'.l1 I I lenton,WA -G- - 912.92' __ 7 L EE ~ D~ IN~ ACIIO&& 1lIE SITE IS LE&& THAN 2', THEI J:l CA<t: NOT TOPO LINES AI'E FI<O\IIDED ... - .' . TSA'a r chi tee t s, p.lI .. 50 1166 Avenue S.B. Suite 201 Bcllc,,"Uc, WA 98004 T 425.401.6828 F 425.4DL0630 www.tsaarcrutccw.com DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON DEC 1 72004 RECEIVED SITE PLAN SHEET NO, A1.0 200327 ~-AACH!CT ..... '" / .-. / ~/ KE TNY ~TE (:" WASHINGTON .... . . '. '. ,~- .................... .... I I I i I i .... .1 . ...... , Date: By .. . . Desa-ptiort 00 ~ccc.c. . ..... ··i· ........•.....•.......••.•. r HAIOOI Pt;ANK 51111<6 /H~·.S~ ••••. c·f .••• '· ••• • .• ~ •••• ~.T •••• f·· •• c •••.• & •.• ; .•..• ( .•.•.• j.c:.··.'·'.·:r=~ ••.• ·~.cc .• c •• c •.•• c· •• c •••.••..• c·.·; .• · •• · •·· .. ;·C .. ·•· •••. ·cc.··c· ]",Y:;;,cc' ·eccc. : .. c.HI'''j''IP~ 51DIN<> .. 1:< ... . ..... , ..... ...... , ... , / J =--= ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ;;~ "-,=,=, "'\ '-. ."C~_ ... _~ -I .. SOUTH ELEVATION Sc.ale, 9192" = 1'-0" . : •... ,', "...... , n, 1...---1----2>c HAIOOI TF1.IM I i i , i I I ; / ~INJM O~ YIN'fJ.. / AAI1..IN6 S"T"STEM 'I ............. . / I" "T )" /:'.> <:~ .............. / ... .... j . . Colpitts Development Co. LLC. ............. .. . Parks ide at • .1. . ...... I I , • I • ,---, . I I I··········· i I I I I I I I I I I , . I I I I : ci.' .Pilllll"" ,"-c···.·".:,' I ": cPcp : .............. ,. ,. ,.:,., ..... ,., ..• ' .,. ··.· •.... )i·.·'··. ·.·······'···.·.'·,,·.···.·.r 4. ~",""I .".(~112M,.2x:.:.: • .: .•• ,. ......•• • :.i.. •..• TF1.IM~ I [C .,: . C ... : .: .. ' ,""X::,., .':: 51DII<6' '. ...... "1 \":' ........ : .. :. . ... -.. . ~~~~!"'"~...... ... ......\~ . ""'0." 2>c HAADI TF1.IM '':::;: .... : ••••••••• 1. ! I.... _C I,.., Cli I 1-+-1 r-- :.. I •• c ,. . .. I .~. I'll , , '.: . , " , IF .:~ I.I······ 88 I , \ t , . , .--.-........ . I I , i • r---.'.,..,.-" .... ' ... :~---.-.-: ... _ ... ---t---+--t"i""",,,,"li!I!lI_ • tar .. -! : ..... ...... <:' . ,. ........ ..... i i ......... .......... . .............., NORTH ELEVATION Sc.ale: 9192" = 1'-0" 95 Burnett TSA'a rc h i te c t S, p.LL, 50 116t'1 Avenue S.E. Suite 201 Bellevue, WA 98004 RentOI\WA T 425.401.6828 F 425.401.0630 www.tsaarchitccts.COffi DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON ELEVATIONS SHEEII NO. DEC 1 72004 RECEIVED A5.2 200327 S i e 1 S ! TOP:::~IM~ . , , II 11'1 o o o 0 I AlIJI¥\'INJM OR VINYL 1 RAI~IN" "y!>'reM~~ , ,I I , • 4><4 I?EG~TIVE BRACE ' HAFtOI p~. >"II 6A"nCNS ;1 HARl:>I Pl..ANI< SIDIN .. / r 2. HARl:>I ;"',M I /: / /rHARDIP~>"II~"\- ...... ·L ........... ! II 7T \1 4>< HAF<DI TF<"<--. r HARPI PI.ANK. 51011'lkSo / r VIN'f\. ""NDO,""" 0) , o o , o o o o }-2x HA"'" TF<I~ Ii r HARDI P~NEL >"II eATreNS : /~ II II~· ' ALUMINUM OF< -",'tir'~ RAI~INS~, ~,~,-,! \ 4>< HA""',! \ \ . ·1 .................... . 1/ .. II U .~HA"'" P~~ SIDINs. I ""NDo>lE> , , ., ., , . !MA'" "" I 'HT . u .. ·····!" .• ".~ .. I II··I .. ~ ...... I ..... I ~." .1rTl~[ I I .~ ... I-IHHI-I:~ ~l--ll--Il--Ilr'--J'" at--t-':-1ElIIElf'lI--+_~,ltll--.. --1 .. ·lr .... --JIII--II-l.... ... ......... .. .... I~f-+-l'I--+' '~_""'I~I ~ ...... RJ::S. w=va 04- T.O. ReS. ~EVEL. " r.o. ,-~ ;~" I o -==== (0 4>< HARDI ~~n; 1/ ~ .. STATE 'V'- If IIII t11--+-I~ Ell--+-I~ 1--1--11--1-1 § I ",H, ... 1111 III ~ -1--+---I}If W • ~ -1--1--1--1 I-~~ H-~~~ H~~~ ..... _-...... . Date: o I ...... '--,l--I,AADI Pl.ANI< ~IDINs HAROI TRIM VIN'I'L. ""NDO"'" By: Descr'ption ® 0 AL.UM'INUM OR VI'N't'L RAIl-INs. 5'1"'5TEM ,--:HI'''''' PANa >"II 6Aj"m<s r-<4.4 DEC;OR.'\TIVE BRACE I Itt :11 f=dl 1111 ..... 1 ---- 1--11--1= 1--1--11--1-1 e:= I-HH-Il=== - IIII _111 1111 Illl 11111 11111 1111 1111 1111 1111 III 1111 MT EAST ELEVATION-Burnett Avenue S. Scale: 5/02" = 1'-0" C0 o o 0 , HARDI P1-ANK SIDIN5 HARDI TF<IM WEST ELEVATION-Park Scale: 5/52" = 1'-0" Parkside at Colpitts Development Co. LLC. 4)(4 DEGOAA TI~ MAGE: 4)( tI"~1 l"'RIM 95 Burnett o 0 I I AU.MI'NUM 0It VIN'T'Io. ~1~INs 5'1"S'reM HAF<DI P~NI< !;IDINs ""NDO'""" , 1'" i , 'l I~ I'll Ell RentOI\WA . .......... \ e ! DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON DEC 1 72004 RECEIVED TSA'a r chi tee t s, p.llc. 50 116th Avenue S.B. Suite 201 Bellevue, 'X'A 98{104 T 425.401.6828 F 425,401.0630 www.tsaarchilects.cotIl. 1... .. ELEVATIONS SHEET NO. A5.1 200327 \?J/~ 1/, '1'/ STATE ~ """";,;';:";:O;U ~~7j:" / ...... ~ )F I Date: By Desctptin , 56.0±. LOV'lEST EXIST.c;,R,ADE 51.91 6RAtl§ .. DRIVE II" G a ~ G U II" 8 ii' II" G U • ~ a ~ u BUILDING SECTION A SCALE, 1/8'=1'-e>' Parks ide at ~tt& Development Co. u.c. 95 Burnett 08 i ~ , ......... · .......... ~11 --._-- Q , '" 9 G PARK BUILDING SECTION A I TSA'a r chi tee t s, p.ll< SHEET NO, A6.1 I , , 50 116th Avenue S.E. Suite 201 BclIcvuc, WA 98004 , T 42S.4D1.6828 F 42S.4D1.0630 , RentOl\WA 200327 www.tsaarchitl:cts.com , , , CF\~; \-ji'~i,_) .. , , ;", t~ r " , .'. .c~ ! . r'" ,. '-"_ .-J ,_.,,; , ___ ."J ---,--- Q 1/2" PLYI'IIOOD iI'I/ Y (6) (1) '2J ROOFING OVER TTl 'I' ~OOD TRUSSES , * 2-LAYERS 5/!>" i'1'PE "X'" ~' ; '1~I __ --+~! __________ ~~"I<~I<--~~~ CC~l~1 ~:~':._~_ ~i'~,::::~m, f'G~Ii'l6::~~;1/~2~" ;~~C.~H~A;N;;NEL~\~~~,"'~~O~'fM~A~X~. ,~BL;D~~b" ~~~"'~.IG~1.i~T~'L~I.tv1~,.,T~~f'>E.,.;;;R~ .. ~I.B~c.~(:?~P7~1£NK~LfEhRE~.D~)~ .. ~~~;jj _ _~~' 1,..' .. .Ii .... ;..!. I ___ --ft!o······ 4'''''''' -'::l!~"----t : I I :1 I /,' ,'-> // // // '_, /c'" '':,. ::-'<"" ~:. ':' // -,,-, // ' '/ '_, __ ':.,'" __ 6O~, BEAM --t I :.. ,/ ..... I! d i I I ~ '6' ' i ~ v J! I I ~ ~ UNIT ~ I i ' ~:rl=4rJ:CIJ:r~[IJ:[lJ:IJ:rIJ:r~::~~::~rI:CIJ:ClJ:rJ~:'trJCrI:CIJ=:~CI~[l:C'I]REjlLVL.4 ! ! p " Wj""" ! , ~ ~"! 9 ! (:\ UNIT * I () I I I ~ '? i ' TYP. I'IIOOD FRAMED FLOOR I.l '" ReU...VL " !! .. I: ~"~ ncn~~~~~~ID~~OI~aI#i=~~~IdI~OID~~D~I~~~ct'I~~~'~I~' II 1/8" TJI t I' I 1/2" ~ CHANNEL , ~, _ 2-LAYERS 5/8" TYPE "X" GIi'l6 ,I , , ~ UNIT v I 9 i 'UNIT, " U ~ 'I 51 ' •• ~ 1 . I ~:rIJ1rIJ:CIJ~!J:CIJ:CIJ:CIJ:ct===v==:fIJ:CIJ:CIJ:CIJ:CIJ:CIJ:c~;cIJ:CIJ~R~.L~2 ~t " I I 'T.Oj, PL Y~. ~ I' I' ~ d I Q i, I PLAN~~ER UNIT 2 UNIT. 12 I' .:- I LANDSC ~ 121 ' P.T. SLAB~-:\ ~ a I ... '\.. a R30 RIGID INSUL. ~ ','" ~ ~ ~ ,J. 'I ~~~~:;:;~~~;:~n"~n;,.~~t~~r~~;;;;,;~~~~~:;:;~d·' ~~I.l~~~~~~n;clE~L.54~':;:;~'~~~!;~;;;;;l:~ . LVL I 'I lUI '; -----------------------.... T'~i SLAB ---- -----, , -----....... - - --.~ -'.--.-,---.~ E--~-~-~--~-~-, i, :, : ',1' : :;HR OCCUPANCY SEPARATION ~ I . I ~ , ' UNIT, I PARKING .' i I I EL.45.0' I () h. SLAB ~ i I i ·t;;;::;;;;::;;;;::;;;;::;;;;;;~~;::;;;;::;;;~;::;;;91:II~E:L.~42~.0~'========,========'k===.=Ti ==== '\.======E=L.4=2=.O,::'1 ~.~-'S~!" , UNIT 10.15% 8~: .! I ! , I ~I.l : PARKING :i I , JI tl'~l_' ~~~==~====~~EL ... ~.ao~.8~:;~·======~==~====9~"I======================~~==~=~=R=K=,~=N=G=RAD===E=:==~=·~~==~·~··============~~~====~~~'k=~~L~Ab~.ftLjV~L~.I~ I '\.. EL.:l2.5' ~"" I: M~ 06 , ~ I j' I N :lE>.O±.LO~STEXIST. GRADE BUILDING SECTION B SCALE, 118'.1'-"'- BUILDING SECTION B TSA'a rch i te cts, p.U" SHEET NO. Parkside at 95 Burnett Date By. DescrPtX:n A6.2 ~~" 50 116tl: Avenue S.E. Suite 201 ARCHI CT Bellevue, W A 98004 L, / ." T 425.401.6828 F 425.4()1.0630 200327 Renton,WA www.tsa-archirccts,corn I/i KE~I Colpitts Development Co. LL.C. STATE ;-wASHINGTON -- '-, ;:-:,!t~i:'~G DE\I':_' :-,::-: , • ."j r"" 0; ., '.! " : "'"'I\!1 . "-",, .. ----.-------~~--------------'--- z· o en :::J &;1 W u.. v '0 u '" E "- 00 ~ o o o O. N o ~ w -" E w i) Z C o '" ~ o o >. " -" -c w +' o 0: en o o o . . - 2 1 Nc,_ L,-FND RRSPIKE IN 4" DIA IP 0_5 DOWN (VIS. 7/3/00) -. - -NOI'Ol'51"E /'y~_ " Z ~ U Z o u ~FND CONC MaN W/TACK ~ IN CASE (VIS. 7/3/00) 'I~~~~i'''\i''_-~'S r)J~:~_,-_ ~-jC:5C) -'L w ~ « N ! ! w g o <.) I I 1 1 ___ I 1 I I I 1-I I I -~-I I I I I I I I : /0;' I I 'I -'-I __ I 1 I I Il.l I I I I I I I I f/j/yfV I I I __~26~66.42'(PACE) -135."15' I I I I I I I I I I ,~~_.~~_L ___ ~_l._~ ____ 1 ___ ~_-.J I I I I I I I I 1 I--~---+~-A--I.------.J------.l-I I I I I I/',I VAl I I ~~--~I-----~~ ~ I N I to I 0'/1 /' I I I : I I I.q-: L() <... h CD I;? r---I CO : Oi I ~ ~ I I I I ~C 1;S I I I z I I I I 11-I 11;1 I I g <nZW"bj 8 I I I I I j I I I I ".~ ~ ~~~~~ b .-~ : : " ;i~,: : ''1: IlO : : "'~;;'; "' ... "'''' "'""" ~~ '-' I I ilj ,-,uug I I I 11; I I m ::0 ,,.:; CIJ N «;I" OJ "<t v (!) I"") u-i I I " : " I <n Z I I _ ,,'" ="...,..., 0 0 "' 8 II "' Cl ~ 0 ;:::' ;:::' ;:::' c" I I I ~U~ ~1~~~~~ ~~~ ct" I I ~~;:::;;i:;2 I : ~g I I 1 : <n"'~~~~~ I/": : ~17~~~ 1 I~~: II 1 I I I ",,,,wwww I 1 I _ r---I I I I I I \ ___ ~@l Nor30 '48 "£ ~ ~ I _____ .... ~~~L.. _ ~."'I 912.92' + 1--1/4 :::::JRI\ -{ P:,}S-'Ui /(: SrC:'i'r'-l , ()", t:AC:: ',--",R\TY. :::S; 6J~L:'-) :l=': FND TACK IN CONC. MON IN CASE 0.7' DOWN (VIS 7/3/00) 509.51' A~ "/,!-1"1' •. · ~ + ~I "-~;;::::::~~~::~~~~~~~~~:::::::::i:;~::J[::~::==~~~~~~~~.~.~~.~~v~t~j~!_~~4'~~~~~~~~~~~~ __ ~~ __ ~~~I~ __ ~~~~~~ ", ••••• ~,., I n • .1 • .1 • .1 ~c~.9E'·(P,4CE~=3.93') TELEPHONE ESM'T I, REC#78082B 1 038 " I 2+1~0' +4'~ : 62.0~4" ~---4"~~ -9+ 238.00' ~+ ~ii.,r~~L-----+:j~---..:'+~CB~I~;II~CK~-'7'i~-------------------------------~ I I ~. ~. I-~~-+---~ I I r:-RIM=36.87 I I I I 11:·_ IE=35.47 4" CONC E .. ". __________ ,: I~;S: '<.'l ~:, I 1'-" HAS t· PIPE GOING THROUGH CB E\W FND 2" BRASS DISK IN CONC. W/PUNCH 0.8' DOWN IN CASE (VIS 7/3/00) ____ ~NO[40'14"E 420.41' I >" I c', :sO "', I ,::' l..' ----.J -~~ '::8 _ "',>cv 15' SAN SEWER ESMNT·-t+-t-,~ C) ~ :?l L - - - - -~ - - - - - -..J I ..... ,-,-,Y-~ -REC#8406010541---115 10'1 ~ '0 ['< '" / .• ,-.'-.-, < ~ _''"--.--' • '-') -',I .:....\ ' I '< . II I ~ ~~-~ 12 ,. .~ u ,) I II I ~ r-t;+ ----, ('1" IITI -. I I I I ". I L"'-' ., I~c:._ II I fI~;,~.,:;"i< I ___ ~ _______ ~ __ ..J iii'" ", .J. I .,' &-8-CI--i_ L '\,,!(,' _, I I A¥~ I I ~ __ .... "'" 62.00' I! ' - ! i I I =-! " T-f- EXISTING BUILDING ~-_TO BE REMOVED (TYP)\ r ------~------- *** * CHICAGO TITLE #566132 (SOUTHERLY PARCEL) D SO U 7 t I __ ---:I-------------THAT PORTION OF THE DONATION LAND CLAIM OF DIANA B. SMITHERS. FAMILY OF ----------------~-'-~ r ______________________ ~ ____ =O:9:~:9:~:8:.~=~~~C:H:N:E:W:ffi:.~0:E~W~~~-~----------D~AB.roBIN,A~D~mDmEH8RSM~OFHEN~Hro~N.D~rn. DESIGNATED AS CLAIM NO. 37 LOCATED IN PARTS OF SECTIONS 17, 18 AND 20 IN TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH. RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNn', N01·38'32"E 305.18· FND MIC 1 1/2" BRASS DISK W/PUNCH WASHINGroN, DEFINED AS FOllOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT 60 FEET WEST OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF BLOCK 24 OF FND 1-1/2" BRASS DISK W/PUNCH SET IN CONC (LS#10219) CASED (VIS.7/3/00) 7{" -",--, . IN CONC #10219 7-3-00 7.-" THE TOWN OF RENTON. ACCORDING ro THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 1 OF PLATS, PAGE 135. IN KING COUNn', WASHINGTON: THENCE SOUTH 16.5 FEET: 'f-~Ac.:t." ~~: \:)0 I'i, :22{-:' I~EC#19:J9C::1~7,j:)CI'~\',~ "S:::L"'~~_IJEf 8:< ,:--6 fJ::; El' ':ECff'~:';' C-/'.?C-J:2 T-::" ='::!.:")" '::<)',,',:\ r1i~~FI1\~ [):~~~s :\CT ;\[Ci:S::j\R LY '~r;~"I--:-/'.,!I\ /,.,L..!_ (J-THe:.. '~<~::;:'/..:..-:~'\ _::3-.. "_I\[:D BY l~:-S~H"':~YDF: '\ ...;,C; c::::l~ '-l''':_~r~":" 0FF!~~E \'VCRK. c::: =<:..:,=-;:.:::;::::- B,t'::>:::: __ ',,;::'',3 :-::-J ->{/J. i:::'"<S=-;:)RCC\="[)V~b V:::'~T O~ EX~_,::'[~ '::"I,:-C-'JR:\CV SIA,>l~JA~~IS A'~~ =--::;> ,', .:._.=. :J:::..: ~ 3U ~I-Jn, ~),L;RAV\,4Pr':) (J:l ,6.I\U 1 ':l,;,. AS NOTED ..:. E\~:.;'>~.:=.-',.'::.·.,-:~ ,::",S :~:_;'ir\; ---iC:I~:::~I\ /IR_ m,_'" lH::~,l ,':::',bOV_ C;r:OI_,\Ji), \iSI8L:: O~~::::,-~ ~"~:;;-;::;'/::D bV Hi-SI'R"v':.yr"JR_ W': Cr-IF.f-IC",--;-::Y'; ";:-) ",.1,1'>,1"::::: C>.;: Itl'~P~'J ~ T,~--..:::':.:::: :::: _:;'; -~; !\p:::)':-(,~'I\G -~~ ~-NCR:),4,::_J-~ ;\'_:-~'i\ loY' -'·,~:RC,4C:'-8\ I~j- 0',,',,\::::;05-=--':=-S.)c.,,'FC:-=--;::~I;i:;:::F:;Y. r ~ ::-::;0,2':::'::::;,-' ~·;:I-,~"r}.~,.1(,{ i-' Sr,:::::'v"lr\ '--FK~'.~',t\l !S t31\,'::"::.~) IJ~I~"I": -Ihi r-:.:LL:J"/'i'i~'JC JI..';::,L~c',:-.;\I'CN::;· A. ~_;:::.. =\':'-V :Jr I:L:::I,:::rr ,)T"ll-1 S ,". S ~'A,::?HT ' \j:-~X'::I\,)-:JI\J Ci!--'TH[ :~r\;TF:;:~ \E sc-_--:>-:; '-:IC\;C! i'J '2,--:';J//\ l~\~ -[ ";-);\,':'::1:." '.::U::;;"·:l-Y C;=---;-.J[ 'UJ N'p.~_r; F,1::::Hi-r.)F-'\,\",L,' :s ;/\.S;c.! eN --Hi:: c''''HS 1\ "'"'-,:=' 'L':::::;,A_ ~:: ;:;;~\\ \,~ ".()i~)-r! ,'".:_U,':, THE:. c..N:--;-L~\=-~---:f ELR\j1 T'", iH::: :>I/J,T c,:::,;/\"~CES --;-c __ GCA-~ 1-::: \'=:::-_ ..... ,:::~,-CO';:>Jlf\:> lei :. E,-'~i''::,< 2.1 Er.:rl ;-I~-It.:"S :~J -HE P /11 !\'~~ I~I ::.;;ST-\'VtS-'- OWNEk/DEVELOPER: THENCE WEST 109.5 FEET ro THE NORTHERN PACIFIC RAIUROAO RIGHT OF WAY; THENCE NORTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID RIGHT OF WAY 300 FEET; THENCE EAST 109.5 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 2B3.5 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THE NORTH 62 FEET THEREOF. TITLE: ~ .--., I . -'" :>i _I r'· ---.' vi 80 ! 1 "=40' SURVEY BY "PACE" IN BOOK 130 OF SURVEYS, PAGE 220, UNDER KING COUNn' RECORDING NUMBER 19990707900018. ;--'-"'~I-'"'-''' ,~ '--"'1 ' .'\' 'I \! t-;----;~ ; :,__...//\L ,---) r, ; ,_) I\;', -------- ------------- Cln' OF RENTON BM#673 -TOP OF 1/4" BRASS PIN SET IN CONC. MON. AT c/l OF MORRIS AVE. & 12' N OF C/l OF S. 2ND ST. ELEV = 9.943 M (32.62 FEET) I ~(,,~~ ~\I _ " ___ ,_) L '\ J .------- N01'30'S5"E 3.10' '* 4"-l~'" CC\~IFt'( (PACE 3.61' FND BRASS PIN IN CONC. MON IN CASE 1.6 DOWN -ALSO Cln' OF RENTON B. M. #673 ELEV~32.62 NAVD 1988 (VIS. 7/03/00) SHEET .. ' •... ENGI"lEERING, INC. T '\ ~ : \):\ A i=; /". P T L /' ,--~ I -c~' I ,I I~ \ 'Vi L'\J 1 ,~1 lESIGNED __ .. OF DRAWN . ___ • --.- . ::<I£CKED ~::_--__ _ 11/17/00 SAH DJD ADDED EXISTING TREES ON WEST SIDE OF SITE 11/10/00 DJD DJD ADDED EXISTING BUilDINGS ,0 BE REMOVED" ~;:::'i ,,;,or: SCALE _~ '--.:.,~- 'J"-i i_p 3y f' }:.;r 1. ... ' ----"' o<::"'u./ :liufre.h/,4TlAM'd J1'''fYY1-iMW/ .Y~r-{/i;-.IM . ~"-J3)56::=:,-4~9' • SeuJle (20e,)S2.:1-"1 L,:)5 • =-i\;< (~55)~:'f.::' ij'Joj Land Planning & Use • Engineering • Surveying 1910-64th Ave"ue West,' lacoma. WA 98466 c ~') 'I <_J .'--.. " ,I --;-, '~ I _ _)'--.J' 1 ~ I· I i -,-r "1 ! -/ ,I' \ ~ / • JOB NO. Df:';.:::-' ' .. ~y: r"'1 (1 ____ :-i l, J,: .' '-1; \_! ',-----,' '_"" '-_~: I ...... z « ..J a.. W I--en ---c-------------c-'~------- ---------------- 15' SAN SEWER ESMNT RECORDING # 8406010541 r" P--17 r-~ ~ . .' i"'" c.., l- ;- t;" ~ ~. -;; 4.00' ~I ~: 0> N 10 .00 z , I , SEC. 17., T. 23 N., R. 5E, W.M. PROPOSED BUILDING UPPER GARAGE F.F.: 42.0' LOWER GARAGE F.F.: 82.S' ri- oc ~ ~ ~-+~~+-~~ __ . _________________________ ~ ____ L-LjJ:::'::::::::::::::::::::::::::4=~==f:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::~n~~~<!l w I;( o z o Vi (;j oc ci z By: By: By: By: RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL -------Date:. ____ _ Date: Date: Date: FACE OF PROPOSED BUILDING Lasl Saved on Sun Oct OJ 2004 all'01pm by Bill Helsley Ale Name: R: \Projecls\1J1 (/SA Architects)\OO1-04 (Parkskle 01 95 Bumelt)\Ov\sheels\PB-sl01.dwg SctJIe: 20 VARIES 2% .. CURB AND GUTTER 1.50' _ 2% ~SAW CUT EXISTING ASPHALT 2" MIN CLASS "B" ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT 4" MIN CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE 2" CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE ED ROAD IMPROVEMENT SECTION NT8 LEGEND II I .; ..•. 1 ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT 1" =20' 20 o DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON DEC 1 72004 RECEIVED 20 40 ------.--. scale feet v o .... o o I .... I: 0 ... 0-... 0 III CD C :>. III Gl ... 1\1 C --(I) c: .... ::J m LO 0> -« (I) "C .- z « ..J 0- W I- en z 0 Ul > W Ct:: w z :::; ~ Ct:: w "-0 Ct:: (L I (L 5: '" ,-'2. co ~ « ;: c o ... I: Gl a: 0 ..J ..J 0 0 -I: CD E 0-0 CD > CD C III .... .... 0- 0 ~ 0 CO) .... :========~ SITE PLAN SHEET NO. g C2.0 t\I ;/)1=========1 o 200327 .... L..-______ .....J Z c( ...J Q.. en w ... -...J -... :::) tr a.. a.. « w I;( C z a UJ G:i tt: I~ \ '>_A.-, , I ... I I EXISTING '. FIRE HYDRANT I J I I -~----.~ --.-._~--_~I _____ .-- CONNECT TO EXISTING SA SEWER MAN NITARY HOLE --------------_. - ARY SAN IT SEWE R STUB 15' SAN SEWER ESMNT RECORDING # 84060105 41 7' ------, ---- ----~ --~""=--------.' -."'. RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL By: Date: ---------._--- By: Date: -------------~ By: Date: ~~4-I-+-~ --------------- g By: Date: -------------------~ 1 } ,. t,zl / 1-1 1-1 f-I ~I 6" "=+ ~ ~ ,- I- ~ f- f- f- .~ l- ~ ~ '--- ~ r- I--- f- Lasl Saved on Sun Ocl 032004 a' 3:04pm by BI71 Helsley File Name: R: \Projecls\131 (TSA Archilecls)\001-04 (Parkside 01 95 Bumell)\D"I\sheels\PB-utol.dwg Scale: 20 I I I I I I r SEC. 17., T. 23 N., R. SE, W.M. CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER --~-4-~--.---~ LL.. I:OST, INDICTOR VALVE JIQ:!>'l- ~ ( " 1 c -'v . uv \' " ) " j -.... \ 11 I 1 ~ 7\~ ? ~ ;) ~ -FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION , 0 III oi .0 ~: ~I 0> N 1xl IX) Z , , 0{ ~ -SO. ----~--.-- \' " ) ~ ") ~") I I I I i 1 T 1 1 1 liT J ~ II PROPOSED BUILDING UPPER GARAGE F.F.: 42.0' LOWER GARAGE F.F.: 32.S' I~ \ '-~ , , ~ 1 EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT CONNECT I TO EXISTING I WATER I I I I I ----+-~-~----I--~CT-~~- I I~ATER I ~ METER I I I I I I ~" ) ~ ~ ~ ") ~ 1 AJi I I I I I 1 I 1 ,~'"I 1 ? ~ ~ ~ J ~ 1= --~ --- , '-1 I .. ~ <J>~ 1 "=20' .. e:: 0 .. c. ... 0 I/) CD C .. >-m .. CD .. III C ~ ~ .... .... CD C .... ::J CO LO Oi) .... « CD "C .-en ~ ~ 9 .... z < ..J 11. CJ) W I--..J l- ::J z 0 UJ '> w '" w z ::J f>:: '" w 0.. 0 '" 0.. I 0.. 3: "" I~ U) I~ ;r () < ;: e:: o .. e:: CD a: 0 ..J ..J 0 0 -e:: CD E c. 0 CD > CD C I/) --c. N - o as 9 0.. 0 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING c;:; CITY OF RENTON ,... ;::======~ 0 DEC 1 72004 RECEIVED 20 o 20 40 ------scale feet UTILITIES PLAN SHEET NO. g C3.0 C\I ;01=========1 ..... o ,...~------------~ 200327 LAND USE COMPLIANCE REFERENCE ISITE AREA, 38,347 SF (.834 ACRES) IZONING GLASIFIGATION , GOMMERGIAL DOV'lNTOV'lN (GD) ZONE, ALLOV'lED, MIXED USE INGLUDING GOMMERGIAL, RESIDENTIAL, PARKING PROPOSED, GOMMERGIAL, RESIDENTIAL, PARKING 4-91-10.I.D.9 STRUGTURE HEIGHT, ALLOV'lED, B6' PROPOSED, MAIN ROOF HT. Ii8.IIof (SEE BUILD. ELEV'.) HIGHEST RAISED ROOF HT. 82.63' (SEE BUILD. ELEV'.) HIGHEST PENTHOUSE ROOF HT. 88.71' (SEE BUILD. ELEV's) 4-91-10.I.D.4 LOT COVERAGE, ALLOV'lED, 100..00!1. PROPOSED, 88.2CH1t 4-91-10.I.D.2 SETBACKS, REQUIRED, NONE PROPOSED, AT GRADE REAR-2S, 801JTH.()', NORTH 10', FRONT-3' 4-91-10.I.D.e LANDSCAPING, REQUIRED, NONE PROPOSED, 2899 aI AT RI LEVEL COURTYARD ATTACHED HOUSING DESIGN GUIDE-REQUIRED, 48 af I DV'lELLING UNIT (SO X 106 = 5,900.F) LINES OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS, PROPOSED, 8970 ai, at R1 IewII CCIII1yBrd 4-14-9.C OFFSTREET PARKING, REQUIRED, ONE SPACE PER DWEWNG UNIT (108 SPACES) PROPOSED, RESIDENTIAL, STANDARD DRIVE AISLE ACCESSIBLE, (8'-4"xI5') 124 COMPACT DRIVE AISLE ACCESSIBLE, (7'-6"xI2'-9") II BARRIER FREE ACCESSIBLE, (8'xI6') 6 TOIt.1. 128,IVE'; AISLE AC(;!E';:::2:::2II21.E'; :::2TALLS 136 STANDARD TANDUM SPACES, 48 TOTAL RESIDENTIAL, 181 IMPERVIOUS SURFACE, EXISTING, 1OOlIo PROPOSED, 88" ~----.... i BUILDING UNIT COUNT rUNIT TYPE _. BldeLklItGoIori.x2a DESCRIPTION . QUANTITY A STUDIO,IBA 9 ~. . .- I A-BF ST1JDIO. IBA + ------ B I BR,IBA 4"1 ._- I BR,IBA 9 B-6F .--. B2 I BR,IBA 8 B2alt I BR,IBA __ 4 _. ---.-~ -------... _----------+ C 2BR,2BA Ie _. C-BF 2BR,2BA 2 D 9BR,2BA 4 -_. E 9BR,2BA 4 B TOV'lNHOUSE I BR,IBA I 6 - C TOV'lNHOUSE 2 BR, 1112 BA 4 _. .._---_. TOTALS 106 --_. FLOOR AREA SUMMARY FLOOR LOCATION AREA i -_ .. -------- LOV'lER GARAGE 22,621 ~f I UPPER GARAGE 22,400 sf LOV'lER LEVEL RES. 1,s5e sf ---- UPPER LEVEL RES. 7,255 sf LEVEL I RES. 21,5"1"1 sf I LEVEL 2 RES. 21,5"1"1 s_f_ -- LEVEL 9 RES. 21,e"l"l sf LEVEL 4 RES. 21,e"l"l sf - ~ TOTALS 147430 sf Date: By: Descip1iort ~~_c M¥.]RCT ...; .. '-~ /---' . -" / . / ~KE . UTNY STATt~ WASf<NGTON I PROJECT INFORMATION: JOB ADDRESS "'5 BURNETT AVENUE SOUTH RENTON, V'lA. ",e055 OWNER PARKSIDE AT "'5 BURNETT, L.L.C. 2256 geth PLACE EAST SEATTLE, V'lA ",e112 CONTACT, DAVE NIELSEN PHONE, FAX, E-MAIL, (206) 922-1gel (206) 56e-e5e", CLIENT IDEVELOPER COLPITTS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L.L.C. 2256 98th PLACE EAST SEATTLE, V'lA "'8112 CONTACT, DAVE NIELSEN PHONE, FAX, E-MAIL, (206) 922-1981 (206) 568-858"1 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBERS $v; 7th Sf KING COUNTY ASSESSORS TAX NO., "1"1 BURNETT A VENUE SOUTH "IS BURNETT AVENUE SOUTH 000120014B02 000120001901 VICINITY MAP LEGAL DESCRIPTION 77 Bvrn .. " Avenv.. Sovth, That prot ion of th .. H .. nr~ H. Tobin don",tion I",nd c.lolm no. 97, Porc.,,1 e 0/' Renton L"nd U$" Ac.tlon #04-0Ie-LLA Rec.ordlng "20040419"'000lBSDLLA Loc."t .. d In S.E. 1/4 of th .. N.E. 1/4 Sec.tlon Ie, To,,"nshlp 29 North, Rang .. 5 East, V'lillam .. tt .. Meridian, In King Count~, V'l"shlngton. "15 Bvrn .. tt Avenue South, That portion of th .. donation land "Ialm of Diana B. Smither., famll~ of DiaM e, Tobin, a .. ido,,", and the heirs at la .. of H6nr~ H. Tobin, de" .. osed, d ... lgnat .. d a. claim no. 97 locat .. d in part. of s .. c.tlons II, 18 and 20, To .. n.hlp 29 North, Range 5 Ea.t, V'lillamette Meridian, In King Count~, V'la.hington, deFln .. d a. follo .. s, B"glnnlng at a po Int 60 f""t .... st of th" north .... st c;orn",r of Bloc.k 24 of the to .. n of R .. nton, ac.c.ordlng to th .. plat thereoF, r .. "ord .. d In volume I of plat", page 195, In King Count~, V'lo~hlngton; th .. nc. .. south 16.5 F .... t; thenc. ....... t 10"1.5 I .... t to th .. Norht .. rn Pac.IFI" Roilro",,, right-oP-,,"o~; th .. nc.e north "long th .... a.t line of said right of "a~ 900 P .... t; thenc.e east 10"1.5 Feet; the,"" .. south 2e9.5 Peet to the point of beginning; .. xc .. pt the north 62 feet thereof. Parkside at 95 Colpltta Development Co. LLC. Burnett N 5th Sf S 9th St SlOthSt ... f'tlllip, Ar'nold park;" > CONSULTANTS: ARCHITBCT: TSA I or4'1it"c.t., pllc. 50 116th Av .. , SE Svlt .. #201 BeII .. vu .. ,'V'lA "IeOO4 CONTAC-, KENT SMUTNY PHONE, FAX, E-MAIL. (425) 401-6e2e (425) 401-0690 kent.@tsoarchlt .. cts.com CIVIL ENGINEER: SITE DEVELOPMENT ASSOGIATES, LLC 10116 MAIN STREET, SUITE 106 BOTHELL,V'lA ",eo I I CONTACT, V'lILLIAM HELSLEY PHONE, FAX, E-MAIL. (425) 486-6599 (425) 486-65"19 someor"lll9@somet"llher-e,Gom LANDSC4PE ARCHITECTS: DESIGN TI'lO FOUR I TI'lO SIX, INC. 2821 NORTHUP V'lAY, SUITE 225 BELLEW!:!, V'lA. "'8004 GONTACT, DAVID HILGERS PHONE, FAX, E-MAIL. , (425) e09-0"l54 (425) e22-SS"l6 50meone@50meY'lher-e.c.om SURVEYOR: BASELINE ENGINEERING, INC. 1"110 64th AVENUE V'lEST TAGOMA, ~ "'B4:f>6 CONTACT, TERRELL FEReUSON PHONE, FAX, E-MAIL, (259) 565-44"'1 (259) 565-8569 GEOTECHINICAL ENGINEER: GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, ING. 19256 N.E. 20th STREET, SUITE 16 BELLEVUE, V'lA. "IBOOS CONTACT, MARC McGINNIS PHONE, FAX. E-MAIL I (425) 741-5618 (425) 141-e561 mClrGm@caeotec.hno.Gom ! Ranton,WA -~~-~----- INDEX OF DRAWINGS ARCHITECTURAL "A" SECTION 0 COVER SHEET A 0.1 TITLEI COVER SHEETI PROJECT INFORMATION SECTION I SITE INFORMATION A 1.0 SITE PLAN SECTION 2 BUILDING PLANS A 2.1 LOV'lER GARAGE PLAN A 2.2 UPPER GARAGE PLAN A 2.9 RESIDENTIAL LEVEL I PLAN A 2.4 RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 2 PLAN (LEVELS 9 AND 4 SIMILAR) A 2.7 ROOF PLAN SECTION 5 BUILDING ELEVATIONS A 5.1 EAST AND V'lEST ELEVATIONS A 5.2 NORTH AND SOUTH ELEVATIONS SECTION 6 BUILDING SECTIONS A 6.1 BUILDING SECTION A A 6.2 BUILDING SECTION B CIVIL "C" CI.O TITLE SHEET C2.0 SITE PLAN C9.0 UTILITIES PLAN C4.o DRAINAGE CONTROL PLAN LANDSCAPE "L" 1..-1.0 LANDSCAPE PLAN 1..-1.1 LAND5CAPE PLAN 1..-1.2 TREE EVALUATION AND IMPACT MAP SURVEY I of I TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY 2 of 2 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT TSA'a r chi tee t s, p.lLc. 50 116th Avenue S.E. Suite 201 Bellevue, \Y1 A 98004 T 425.401.6828 F 425.401.0630 www.tsaatchitccts.com , DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON . DEC 1 72004 RECEIVED COVER SHEET SHEET NO. AO.1 200327 I I r I I ~ I 0 .... • ii I ~ ~~ .... ~ 10 i l! I Z « ...J I a.. . ...J 0 a: ~ I Z 0 0 w C!' I « , z -« a: 0 I I . . " .~ _0 0._ I ",0 0':' I ~z en ~:s 00 oE ~E-4 ~~ --.-- o _ E-4 Z :Ow " . -~ 0..0.. U~ ....... e 0>0 .S E . 'O~ ==4) ~ "E ~E "'.-eN -------·c (J) c'" 0., 0..(5 i ~ -I ~ ~i II ~ 0 -r i i ~~I d~ ~~i ~ _L... I I I ~ I iii ~ a:: 0.. 0.. -. .----_..-:-- -« ," " -- w ~ 0 6:i z 0 Ul G:i a:: RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL By: Date: By: Date: By: Date: ci By: Date: z 1 5' SAN SEWER ESI.4NT RECORDING # 84060105 SEC. 17., T. 23 N., R. 5E, W.M . -.-----~ ~---.--_--~~--~~--I----c ---.-.-~---~~--. -.~~~~ -~-. ~---~~~~ -,-- INSTALL lYPE 1 CB I I T I I I - r"'1'I' f- t-- l- f- f-I f-'i 7' Ib '- 41 f-r f- f- f- f- - - - f- f- t-- f- f- - l- I- ( . 1 1"1 Uv ( • ) I 11 I I Ol N ill z I I , INSTALL lYPE 1 CB~ , . ) ( .] .) ~. ) I I I r I' I I I I I I T PROPOSED BUILDING UPPER GARAGE F.F.: 42_0' LOWER GARAGE F.F.: 32.6' II STORM DRAIN CONNECTION TO BUILDING I lill I I I I I-'-i I .-I , .. I .-~ ----_._-I --i , I I I I I ~ ) I ~ ~ .) ~ i n ..., ~i I I r I T T I .4-J' I d ~ ~ ~ J ~ I F= -- I , -, I f-________ ~-LLt:='======::::===+:~".f=";~±================::::===:::='=======::::============~~ A'§>~-:' i Last Saved on Sun Oct 032004 al 2:43pm by 8!11 Helsley File Name: R: \Projects\131 (TSA Architects)\OOI-04 (Porl<side ot 95 Bumetl)\D'lfg\sheets\PB-uto1.dwg Scde: 20 --- 1"=20' 20 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON DEC 1 72004 RECEIVED z~""1---\ o 20 40 -------- scale feet "" o I ,... o o I ,... C; 0 ... Q. .-... 0 III G) 0 .. >-III .. G) ... '" 0 - --CD c:: 10- ::J OJ La 0> -« CD 'C .-en ~ io-as a.. z 0 (f] :> w 0: w z ...J >-l-0: w "-0 0: "- :r "-3: " I~ cD I:::: N ~ <C ;: C; 0 ... C; G) a: z <C ...J 0... ...J 0 0 a: . r-...J Z ...J 0 0 0 0 W ... (!J C; <C G) z E -Q. <C 0 a: G) 0 > G) 0 m ... ... .-Q. 0 C? ,...~======: 0 DRAINAGE CONTROL PLAN SHEET NO. g C4.0 C\I ;oF======~ "-o ,... L--___ ---' 200327 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I _ -L : . .. . . . '. '4" . ',,/ '.', A.. -, _ .4 • if 4" .' ,. . . '. '" . ~ ," -4. • ,"if" " f! .. '. ,,' : "", • "-4 •. • --... . . . .' -• 4' 4' • • 4"' . 4. <1,'. ", <t,. '. .• . . .. • . .. . . . •• '. 'f1 • •• '1-'-'--1, ." : .. ' 4-. <I' -." . "" . . . ." 4. - /' " I . Iii" .................. . (V[RIFY) Wv ~O-L---~-______ 00 / / /. / :~ -.J BURNETT AVENUE SOUTH .. .. • .. ----0; C"J N01'30'48"E ___ _ '. '. '. . '. '. ,0 . • . . • ~.4 .• BUILDIN ( \ \ '--) LJrj FFl.O\IIDE ~ NO 1 '30'48"[ eE1UEEN eulLDINGI AND F'I'OPOERI"r LINE J,IJ f!I.IOUN Q) C-o- Q) oC--{i ...... co r Q) c-0--....c u ...... CO r I' ........ 'j ~ ......... . .......... ........... S"T116OL 1'Fil\:E& 0 <:) eIlFU!l& 0 I"E~IAL.& ~ ~ ~ DEVELOPMENT PLANNING C.ITY OF RENTON DEC 1 72004 RECEIVED STREET LEVEL PLANT SCHEDULE COMMON NAME AUTtMI f'lIFiiPLE A6I-I ARleTOCRAT !"EAR COLI.II'1NAR 11JI..IP TfEE TIAWAN eRAMeI..E FINELAILN~ BOTANICAL NAME FRAXNJ& A '.l.INaoINi:iER' PYRJ5 C. 'ARI&TOCRAT' LIRCP~ T. 'FAeTIGIA11JM' FENNI6E11JM &P. 'I-IAl"ELIN' '"'-IeU& CAL l"CINOIDE& SIZE 2' cal., Bte, 12' MIn.I4l 2' cal., Bte, 12' Mln.14l 1-1/2' cal. ete, \1)' Mln.14l 1 GAL. I Gal., w' OJ;. I Gal., W' OJ;. SUGGESTED CONTAINER PLANTS COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME SIZE KC1U&A DOGWOOD COFONU& KC1U&A ete RJU. M~ MAFLE ACER JAf>Ct,lICI.M 'FlU. ~' ete .. - COIIW.. ISAN(. 1'1AI"L.! ACER Jf""'IlCIJ1 'CORAL. 6AAK' BtB ~&T C'rFfE&6 ~ M. 'GOLDCF<E&T' ete ALPINE FIR ABIES LJ,lJIOCAf<PA ete NEW ZEAL.6W FLAX ~11t1 TENAX ' YELLOW WAVE' 3 GAL NEW ZEAL.6W FLAX ~I\J'I TENAX ' JICK &PR4T' 3 GAL DIiJAF;l' FO"Il-IERiILLA FOTI-IERiILLA GAF<PENII 3 GAL KELSEYI DOGWOOD CO!'NJ6'6ERv1CEA 'tc:E1.6EYI' 3 GAL. &EDUM &EDUM VAR. '~JOY' 3 GAL. FU&Q.lIA FIJ&CI.IIA 'GAR1'EN'1EI&TER' 3 GAL. GERANII.M GERANIl.t1 &P. POTS COLEUS COLEU&:'&O~ ~6E' POTS HElJCI.IERA HElJCI.IERA &P. POTe I-IO&TA I-IO&TA 'BIG DADDY' POTS WILD &TR4UeEF<PI:j ~A CI-IILOEN&I& 3 GAL. WIN I EkCk£L1 Ei'C EUON'l11I& F. 'E1"ERALD GAEITY' 3 GAL eRAMeLE '"'-IeU& ClAl.. YClNOlDEe 3 GAL. TI-I'YME 1lm'1U& VAR. 3 GAL o 5' 10' 20' 40' m ~I I SCALE: 1-= 10' Design Two Four/Two Six, Inc. 2821 Northup Way, Suite 225 Bellevue, WA 98004 ph. (425) 881-2426 fax (425) 576-5229 +-_-1-www.design2426.com Landscape Architecture • Athletic Reid Design • Irrigation Planning BURNETT 95 Renton, WA Design Team "1/50/04 .2426 ProjOG-t No. Revisions .Jl2... ""'" D~!Pt\cn Key Plan Registration STATE OF WASHINGTON ~ -CERI'FtCKfE NO. m. Sheet Title LANDSCAPE PLAN Sheet No. L-1.0 ) Q) _ s;: .- ) Q) _ .s;: \ ) ) Q) _ s;: .- )~ ...... J 'U r BURNETT AVENUE SOUTH \ ------t-@ID- 'e/ ( \ () . ' ••. '. "9" .• ' •• '. SUI .. ", I I I I I I I ~I c:::J1 c:::J1 <:::::il <.01 1 1 1 1 I I "I ", . r-f:-\'I",' "', L' • • <f -• '''". . :d:' J '. ,. .. -. , ~ 1'",_ _ <IS •• :4 .. '."" .~." , . It, . "..:I" ,-. -'.of". , . .' 'It'" 4, ,.c. 0'1. ' , ' • '..' <1 • .Q".' '4.;t • " -4 " " <t .' ".~ '" ~ ." " , .., , 4' ~'~ _: , ." .l;.' . ., .. ',,<1.6 , " . , . ,,4_, :" 4:", .. " 4' , .' . " .. "4 " -, '. ~.d 4 • " . t '., '.,~ - .4 " • , • ""',. 4. • _4. {1 ": 0) ~ , ~1I~~~~~nF~~~~~~W=~:J~~lf~~~~~~rc~~~]£::~~f\~E3~~~~~jF~~~S]~~'~r11 ~ 'y-/ \ \ /~ f'f<IOYlPE ~ ElETIIEEN 6UILDiNCS AND _---I PFIOF'OERTY LINE .6IJ SHOUN 'y-./ • o o SIIF<IJ6S o FEf<felIALS ~ ~~ ~ DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON DEC 1 72004 RECEIVED STREET LEVEL PLANT SCHEDULE COMMONNAMS AUTUMN~A5H ~TOCRAT FEA~ COL~TULIP~ TIAlIJAN eM1BLE FINE LAUN ~EP BOT AJliCAL NAMS ~1Nle A. '.JI.INGINGE~' PYRJS I.:' 'ARISTOCRAT' LI~ T. 'FA&TIGrIA1U1' FEI+IISEI\JM &P. 'HAl"ELIN' F<IJaU& CAL YCINOIPES SIZE 2' cal, ee, 12' MIn. !-It. 2' cal, ee, 12' Min. !-It. 1-112' cal. e.e. \1)' MIn. Ht. I GAL. I Gal,.w' at:.. I Gal, .w' at:.. SUGGESTED CONTAINER PLANTS COMMONNAMS BOT CAL NAMS SIZE KOU&A POOUJOOp COf;t&.IS KOU&A ee FULL MOON MAFLE ACeR J,oI,p(;t.lICU1 'FULL MOON' ee -. ",~ OOIUL ~ I'W'LE ACEFl J.foPCNICU1 'corw. eAAl<' , -.. ----.. -~ e.e GOLPC:J;£ST CTFrE&& ~ M. 'GOLPCFiEST' ee ALPINE FIR ABIES LA&IOCAI~ ~ ee NEW ZEALAND FLAX ~IIM 1ENAX I YELLOW WA'v1:' 3GrAL. NEW ZEALAND FLAX ~IIM 1ENAX ' JACK Sf'RAT' 3 GAL. DWAF<F f'OTI.IERiILLA FOTI-SiIiILLA GA~II 3 GAL. KaSEYI DOGWOOD COf;NJ6r5ERYlCEA 'tCELSEYI' 3 GAL. 5EPUM 5EDlI'1 'fAA. 'AU'II.MI JOY' 3 GAL. RJeCI.IIA F!JSCI.IIA 'GrAR1'9I'1EISTER' 3 GAL. GERANIUM GERANIlt1 &Po FOT5 COLEUS COLEUS '&aLAR Sl.Nfi!l5E' FOT6 I-EUCl-ERA I-EIJCI.ERA &P. FOT6 H06TA H06TA 'e1G PADPY' POTS WJU) S'MAIleEAAI FRAGEfiilA CI-IILOEN&IS 3 GAL. WINTE~ EIJCN\11I6 F. ~ GAEITY' 3 GAL. eRAMBLE F<IJaU& CAL. YCINOIPES 3 GAL. THYME THYI'1J& VAA. 3 GAL. 0 5' 10' 20' 40' ru I I I SCALE: 1--10' - --------_ .. Design Two Four/Two Six, Inc, 2821 Northup Way. Suite 225 Bellevue, WA 98004 ph. (425) 881-2426 fax (425) 576-5229 +-_4 www.design2426.com Landscape Architecture· Athletic FJe!d Design. Irrigation Planning BURNETT 95 Renton, WA Design Team """'9" DCH Cf/!3O/04 2426 PrcJec.t No. 450 Revisions --- Key Plan Registration STAlE Of WASHINGTON ~ ~n:MO.m.. Sheet Title LANDSCAPE PLAN Sheet No, L-1.1 .2ooJ D~rgn 2426 lne. ,,' " .. , . Date: By Desa-ption: ~.~ ARCHil CT ",. 7/-7---' "" ,/1;/ 1/ r' KEeGc ~TE "WASHINGTON - SOUTH ELEVATION Sc.ole: 9~2" = 1'-0" 00 , ! , H""F,I PLJ\NK SIDIN6 ;..-_ 2x HARDI TRIM AUJMII>lJM OF< VlN'!'~ ,......1~1N6 SYST&! ..... , " I J. ~ \ \. I I -, --, -5 I~ ~ IIIIIC) -- Parkside Colpitts Development Co. LLC. at ',' , , • , i i , i 95 I I I ", 2)( HARPI TRIM o ! •••• I •••• NORTH ELEVAlflON Sc.ole: 9/92" = 1'-0" I I J~ C ~~-... ~ , Burnett ! , , ~enton,WA ELEVATIONS TSA'a r chi tee t s, p.Llc. SHEET NO. A5.2 50 116tb Avenue S.E. Suite 201 Bellevue, W A 98004 T 425.401.6828 F 425A01.0630 www.tsaarchitccts.com 200327 216.50' I r IS' SAN SEILER ESMNT -:-:-:-+- RECORDING • 840611l112lS41 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I NOI'JO'48"E ..216.~o.:... ~. 77.~ ,~.~.'.~.~.'.~~.'.~.~.'.~.~."~'~"'~''+'" : -:-:-: _ -:-:-. 7:'" ••. -:7 . 7:"'.' . -:-:-• -:-:-• -. . . . . . . - . - - IRR VALVE Dale: >v ~D ! WATER vAL1L T \ By Descr'ptiort o A 1L. '.~ ~= ~p,: ~_"!Y_ ~TEOF ---~ 1WO &TORr T<lIIHICUIIE .... , ........ "i N01 CITY PARK LANDSCAPING LANDSCAP""", LANDSCAPING SITE PLAN SCALE: 1:20 LUAO 33 Sl~-H ~ .i Parkside at' 95 Colpitts Development Co. LLC. . -~ --"-; , u- --'. ~ Burnett , r_o_" •••• -.--""'l ' , , LANDSCAPING F I IRenton,WA NQ!E, DIlfEI'iENCE IN GI'ADE ACI<OS5 TI£ elTE Ie LES5 THAN 7'. THEI<I3'Of<E NOT TOPO LINES ARE f'FlOVlDED . . '. 912.92' TSA'a r chi tee t S, p.Llc. 50116'" Avenue S.E. Sui'e 201 Bellevue, WA 98004 T 425.401.6828 F 425.401.0630 www.tsaarchitccTh.com SITE PLAN SHEET NO, A1.0 200327 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 _ --L ~ 4 · . .' . , . . '. '4" .'~ ',', .. .4. "' . .4'4" "1, • • •• • • ~. __ . 4~ .: -... 04 -.... ,4· " · . ~ A. '. Jl: . ~ : ." . . · .. : ... .. " 4 • '';' , 4'. 4' 4' • :do. ",. '. ',' •••• ,.j, •. j .' '? ..' ", 4 .: .;4.' • • ,<1', ", ,-," . "", .. .. ... · . ..... .' . . '. '" . • · . "'. . • ·.i '" • <. .. Wv ~OJ------__________ f)(/ . ..,' . BURNETT AVENUE SOUTH ( \ / Nor30'48''E ---- ...... TT AVE S. \ .. • '.4 ... < . POS D BUILDIN f'ROIIIDE~ eETIIEEN BUILDING ""' ---' ~ UNE AS &HOUN , NO 1 '30 '48 't Q) C .---fi ..... Q) C .- -fi ..... to r - *' I"" ....... '1 ........... . ........ . ........... S'YM60L. o o &lIFiIII,16 o FERRENIALS ~ GFO\.ND~ ~ STREET LEVEL PLANT SCHEDULE COMMON NAME AUl1.MI f"Uf<F'L.E A&H ARISTOCRAT FEAR COL.IJMNAR 1UL.IP l1I<EE DlIJAR" FGUlTAIN GRA&6 60T ANICAL. NAME FRAXINU& A 'Jl.INGINGER' PYRJ& C. 'ARISTOCRAT' L.fR:)DENDRQN T. 'FASTIGIATIJ'1' FENNI&E'ruM &P. 'HAl"EL.IN' Fil1JBU& CAL. YCINOIDE& SIZE 2' Gal., eta. 12' MIn. HL 2' Gal., Bta, 12' MIn. HL I-In' Gal., e.e. 11)' MIn. Hl 1 GAI... 1 GaI.,:11)· OC. 1 Ga I., :11)' OC. SUGGESTED CONTAINER PLANTS COMMON NAME 60T ANICAL. NAME SIZE KOU&A DOGIWOOD COI'MI& KOU&A eta PJU.. MOCtI MAPL.E ACER JAPONIOJ'I 'FlU. MOCtI' eta CORAL eAfIIiK MAI"LE ACER JAPONICU"I '~ eAI<K' 646 GOI.DCf<eST C'l"Ff'E&6 ai!"'f<E&eU& M. 'OOL.DCFi£ST' e46 ALPINE FIR ABIES L.A&IOCAR"A eta NEW ZE~ FLAX R-IOFIMIlM TENAX ' YEL.l.OW WAVE' !6AI... NEW ZEAL.6l'Q FLAX f>HOFit1l1J1 TENAX ' JACK &PRAT' ! 6AI... DWAf;f FOTI-IERiIL.L.A FOTHERiIL.L.A ~II ! 6AI... KEL.SEYI DOGIWOOD COFi!NU&SERVlCEA 'KELSEYI' ! 6AI... &EDIJ1 &EDUM VAR 'AlJt1.fI'1oI JOY' !GAL.. I'lf&CI.IIA FUSCHIA 'GARTEN"lEISTER' !GAL.. GERANIIJ1 GERANIUM &P. f'OT& COL.EU& COLEUS 'S01..AFi: ~SE' f'OT& ~ HElJCI.lER6. &P' f'OT& J.lO&TA J.lO&TA 'BIG DADDY' f'OT& WIL.D 6TRAl1eEJ1<R'( FFtAGERIA CI-IIL.OEN&IS HirAI .. WIN~R EUCtlY1'1I8 F. 'EI'1ERAL.D GAEITY' !GAL.. BRAM6L.E I'<U6U& CAL. YCINOIDES !6AI... THYI1E THl1'1LI& VAR !GAL.. o 5' 10' 20' 40' m ~I I SCALE: l' = 10' U-H F Design Two Four/Two Six, Inc. 2821 Northup Way, Suite 225 Bellevue, WA 98004 ph. (425) 881-2426 fax (425) 576-5229 l---4 www.design2426.com Landscape Architecture • Athletic Reid Design· lnigation Planning ...1!!<2..... BURNETT 95 Renton, WA J2g~ Design Team ""Iq> DC+! ""'. Revisions PHC('1\?t1On Key Plan Registration STATE OF WASHINGTON ~ :" ~ DAVlc::iLGERS CERIFJCIi\TE NO. .m. Sheet Title LANDSCAPE PLAN Sheet No. L-1.0 200l D-H£gn 2426 I~, Date: ~ .. " ,;. . , 1...-____ ---1 I...-__ .....;... __________ -..:""F-"'_' --- I i>.~'""- 1 ,,~~, I i I ~ '. I ; i , EIGHBORHOOD MAP SCALE: I: IrZIrZI Parkside at 95 Burnett Colpitts Development Co. LLC. I Renton,WA 'fa TSA I arc hit e c t s, p.U" 50 116:h Avenue S,E. Suite 201 Bellevue, WA 98004 T 425.401.6828 F 425.4D1.0630 www.tsaatchitccts.com ~ ~ IX) ~ , .,.... ..J ~ -::iE m :::I rtJ NEIGHBORHOOD MAP 3: w -> SHEET NO. w a: A1.0 z :s a.. w 200327 I--rtJ ) Q) s;;: -.- iii · .... 1 Q) s;;: .--iii · .... ] 'tl r \ ) .,-+-.,-..... ) Q) s;;: -.- iii · .... 1 'tl r ( \ 4 BURNETT AVENUE SOUTH \ ----+l('~ , lQ.J / "' ... /' .. ',0 .' ( \ ( \ BUlL ING \ ) .. o· .. , 1 1 1 1 1 1 ~I c::::,1 c::::,1 <:::)1 \01 1 1 1 1 1 1 .. ' 1 -. J'-1~r J, ., . , , .. 1' \ . ,. . .<I "'.4 . , .4 . &. -$' 4 '. .. f " • '4 .-Jl. . '" ., c::::, lC) u) ~~I (~ " ~, .,...,..""""",,"'..lo,,,,-.,... ""7.-:-. .,.... -:-.. '"c . ...,..,.L ..,..-~ -,-, -. .,.~.~.~.~. "". "" .. "".;<E.==.==. ==. r::!J. L .. -.-. =. =. ~. :~=:"==-,== ..,..=tE. == .. ==."".o!l.. -. -.:.: . .,..~.::_.~. ~" .. OE ... :== .. ""."".==.==. ==. !.l .. -.. --.-.-.-. ==l:'=>====3E"===~. .J v/ )J V-/ • ~ , ... '1 ........... .......... .......... . o 61 R-lee o f£AA£hIALe STREET LEVEL PLANT SCHEDULE COMMON NAME AU11MI RA=LE AeH AAl6Tcx:RAT FEAR COLlI1NAF! l\JI..lP 11IiEE TIAW.AN eM"IeLE FINELAILN~ eoTANICAL NAME P'I1'IJ6 C. 'AAl6Tcx:RAT' LI~ T. "AeTIGIAlU1' F9NleelII16f', 'HAMELIN' F'l1e'1& CAL YCINOIDEe SIZE 2' car. ee, 1:/' MIn. r.IL 2' car. ee, 1:/' Mln.1oIt. 1-1/2' car. ee, IiII)' MIn. r.IL 1 GAL. 1 CiIIr. 3£1' ot:.. SUGGESTED CONTAINER PLANTS COMMON NAME ALPINE FIR lEW ZEALAND FLAX lEW ZEAl AND FLAX DWAR= FO'TI-IERiILLA t<ELeEY1 DOCiWOOP I-IOeTA WILP6~ o 5' 10' 20' ru ~I .......,1 eoT ANICAL NAME CUf'lilEeeu6 M. 'G4DC1rEeT' AlSIE6 LAelOC 4F'1"A f"1-IOIQIllII1 TENAX ' YELLOW UIA't£' f'HOF'I1llJ1 TENAX ' JACK. SPRAT' FO'TI-IERiILLA GAR:lENil COF'i'lJ6 eeJlMC$ t::ELeEY1' GERANIlJ1 6f'. COLEL16 'SOLAR ~ee' I£1IC1£RA 6f'. I-IOeTA 'BIG PA!»Y' FRAGERlA CIoIIL~16 E1.IClNYI'1.I6 F. ~ CiAEITY' F'l1e'1& CAL YCINC.1PEe lHYI1J&vAA 40' SCALE: 1-= 10' .~. ee ee SIZE 3 GAL. 3 GAL. 3 GAL. 3 GAL. 3 GAL. 3 GAL. 3 GAL. 3 GAL. 3 GAL. 3 GAL. Design Two Four/Two Six, Inc. 2821 Northup Way, Suite 225 Bellevue, WA 98004 ph. (425) 881-2426 fax (425) 576-5229 ~_--+ www.design2426.com Landscape Architecture' Athletic Field Design· Irrigation Planning BURNETT 95 Renton, WA Design Team ""''9'' ~ Dr .... Dot • 2426 ProJ«-t No. Revisions ---- Key Plan Registration STATE OF WASHINGTON o p. ~ ~~ """ ' DAVic:fLGERS CERIIF1CA1E NO. m. Sheet Title LANDSCAPE PLAN Sheet No. L-1.1 :1001 Deal9'1 )426 Inc.. 4 .;.. -' N A B ~YMtlUL~ & Lt:.l:it:.NU: lEI EXHAUST FAN. -SEE SEGTION AO FOR ENER6Y GOMPLIANGE. o IIOV SMOKE DETEGTOR, -YII/ DI5GONNEGTION SV'lITGH 4 BATTERY BAGKUP D INDIGATES ,",ALL TYPE, -SEE Io'IALL 5GHEDULE. SHT A4.1. INOIGATES BO"x48" MANEUVERIN6 5PAGE AT BATHROOM. TYP. AT TYPE 'B' DV'lELLlN6 UNIT5 (ONE BATHROOM EAGH UNIT). A EMER6ENGY Ll6HT. /~-,\ < > INDIGATES V'lINDOV'l TYPE, r \ INOIGATES 60" DIAMETER UNOB5TRUGTED . -5EE V'lINDO,", SGHEDULE. SHT A4.::2, \ / FLOOR 5PAGE. '-- ( ) INDIGATE5 DOOR TYPE, ----SEE DOOR ~HEDULE. 5HT A4.9. IEXITI ILLUMINATED EXIT SI6N AS NOTED. o I 8 T I YI"'I~AL I"'LAN NU I t:.~: I. DlMENSION5 ARE TO THE FACE OF 5TUD (F.O,S), FACE OF CONCRETE (F.o.G.), FAGE OF POST (F.o.P.) OR CENTERLINE OF PARTY V'lALL5 UN.O. VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS. ::2, EXTERIOR V'lALL5 TO BE 2x6 STUD5, TYP. (U.N.O) INTERIOR V'lALL5 TO BE 2x4 STUDS, TYP. (U.N.oJ ALL CONSTRUCTION TO BE ONE HOUR FIRE RATED TYP, (U.N,O.), B. FOR FLOOR/CEILING> AND ROOF/CEILIN~ TYPES AND ASSEMBLIES, SEE BUILDIN~ SECTIONS IN 5EGTION AI;. 4. FOR PLATE HEI~HTS $EE BUILDIN6 SEC.TIONS IN SECTION AI; AND CORE SEc.TIONS IN SECTION A~. 8 I tlUILUINl:i I"'LAN NU I t:.~: I. SEE INDIVIDUAL UNIT FLOOR PLANS IN SECTiON AB FOR DETAILED INFORMATION. (DIMEN510N5, CONSTRUCTION, DOOR/i'lINDOV'l, ETC.) ::2. SEE ENLAR6ED STAIRIELEVATOR CORE DRAI'IIN~5 IN 5ECTION M FOR DETAILED INFORMATION lDETAILS, CONSTRUCTION, DOOR/ViINDOVi, ETC) B. PROPERTY L1NE5 5HOViN FOR 5ENERAL INFORMATION ONLY. 5EE 51TE PLAN ON SHEET AI.l FOR PLAGEMENT OF BUILDIN~. 4. THE BUILDIN6 IS TO BE FIRE SPRINKLERED THROU5HOUT. S. SEE SITE PLAN IN SEGTION AI FOR DETAILED INFORMATION OR SITE FEATURES. (i .. , ~ARDEN Y'lALLS, PILASTER5, PLANTERS, I'IALK5, STEPS, ETC.) o T 8 1'_cfYe" '! 11'-0" 19'-O"! 11'...0" I 11'-0" 190'-0" 11'-0" 19'-0' 11'-0' I 19'-0" I 11'-0" 19'-0" 11'-0" 19'-0" 14'-0" 19'-0' 11'-0" 19'-0' 11'-0" IS'-O' 11'-0" 19'-0' 11'-0" 19'-0" 11'-0" ----"-11'-0' 15'-0' II'-o"~" ..1-__ . I I I I I I I ..1-__ ~. I I I ---,-_. / .;.. , N ~>r~~ "L/ !I/~ b I/~ ~ L/: " ~ / L/i F-/:> 'r-\j . 19 e <., 1 ~~I[] 7 C []I~-I Ie LAJ ~;/ Ie ~ \j' . 19 e ,-'-J I /ojll..,'-\j I 0lg;--\j 0 <. f IV ......... r" (~. -m r 1~~:'± JrUl-,. r~irn n~ ,. ~~il Ill-i "'"" / p _ r'" "'. 1/ L-__ ~ ~ ~\:I I" - -\LI7. ~:.I.:r.I:t~X'!"l, ~ d~ ;y J rlIJ ~~:i--jlr UNITC @TI UNIT B [}ill UNIT B [3ill UNIT B UNIT C L NIT B2 ' : UNIT B2 UNIT C-BF I UNIT B !I UNIT B ! UNIT B ~ ~ ~ ~ Iml !~,~ Ilml UNITC [ED I I I 0, i I ------I!o~~4U='_------'.!~~rlV _ _________1~~FV--~~"F' L.D_~_-i= iV~~~,.. ..... ----{O+=~cf=~=-----L---.:c==t=----=--~, ----=L.~~~---l----_~~FI ~==c!L-_~-JSF1 ~~ __ 'C~I ~~_---=L.~~~ _ i{~ 8 ~<f,-, -----!-L-!-------+-!i ----~i -----"-..:-----i---·---,..--"--------,; -----i:-------'--·-----·-----+-----------iH~--~; ------·T-i --------ti------------·--+-i ----'-.. ------.--:Ii-·-----'----------1I----------:i-----'---·---------.------.---:~I _3''''jr-'1<----{ 10 J--2"-:"!~r.· -it' ===I="-O="===~' ===~I_"~-o_ "'-_" ===t1===I'='-O:::" ==~;,:::===II'-o==~'_' ==~+===='"='-o="===~==='="-o="===~====I"~-o-c..._" ===J.t' ===11='-0:" ==j',,:::===I="-==O'=' ===.!:::,===II'=-O=" =1..=j.I===="~'-o="===j.I':::==='I'-o==-'_ -_ -_+'1' =j:=,"='-o="===~;===~,;;',,,,,4~-o~,-o;;;-',-',, ===J.t====I'='-o=·===i~i'':::==!!.:I-I'-=o'-'--_ -_..c!===~I'~'-O,=' ===J.t' ===I=I'-o="===l~, ===~I""'-_O,=' ===t:' ===I'~'-O=" ==j'I,:::===I="-==O'=' ==~;t===II'-o==-'_' ==!====,"='-O="===:!',:::==!!:.:I_I'-=O"===!==='I='-O:::" ==j2,:::===I=:,'-o=='====!:::,===I"':f-_O=" ==f'" 00 800 (~)0 00 08 00 0000808000088 @ RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 1 PLAN SCALE: 9/92"=1'-0" Date: By DescrPtion: ~~-Parkside at 95 Burnett ARCH,",CT , // / / I 1/ K:e% I ~TE WASHINGTON Colpitts Development Co. LLC, Rei TSA' h' arc I tee t s, p,ll.e. 50 116th Avenue S.E. Suite 201 Bellevue, WA 98004 on,WA T 425.401.6828 F 425.401.0630 www.tsllarchitccts.com DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON DEC 1 72004 RECEIVED (!j j::: ~ .- BUILDING PLAN C SHEET NO, A2.3 200327 W ~!( !!!c ~a.. a:::l ~~ a..-w~ .... 111 _::l 00 0 .. ~ • h ~'r" .. ~ 10 ~ t- W W J: en w ..J t--t- .L .... 0 0. .... ,,0 O.!:; ~Z Ul W·-..:Io:::.S 00 aE ~E-4 3=~ o _ E-4 Z :Ow :::I • ~r:.::l a. a. uP::; "-..e 0>0 . S E "OL ;:41) ! :::IE ~E 0>'-eN 'c CJ1 e", .£~ Q..C) .!~ -il r ~ II ~ .- il Q iiI d~ ~!i a '- :I: ~ :I: :I: "-"-"-~ ~ ~ i I I ~ I ~ 0:: a. a. «: w ~ 0 fu z a If) GJ 0:: a z By: By: By: By: BASIS OF BEA RING SURVEY BY "PACE" IN B OOK 130 OF SURVEYS. COUNTY RECORDING 18. PAGE 220, UNDER KING NUMBER 199907079000 REFERENCES: "PACE" BK 130 PG 220 R EC#19990707900018 81 REC#9511079002 "SCHNEIDER" BK 106 PG VERTICAL OAT UM CITY OF RENTON BM#67 3 -TOP OF 1/4" C. MON. AT C/L OF BRASS PIN SET IN CON MORRIS AVE. & 12' N OF C/L OF S, 2ND ST. ELEV = 9.943 M (32.62 FEET) LEGAL DESCRIP TION: 77 BURNETT AVENUE SO UTH: THAT PROTION OF THE OF RENTON LAND USE A HENRY H. TOBIN DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 37. PARCEL B CTION #04-018-LLA RECORDING #20040413900018SDLLA F THE N.E. 1/4 SECTION 18. TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH. RANGE RIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON. LOCATEO IN S.E. 1/4 0 5 EAST. WILLAMETTE ME 95 f.lUB~E II AYEt:lUE SO UTH; THAT PORTION OF THE DONATION LAND CLAIM OF DIANA B. SMITHERS. FAMILY OF DIANA B. TOBIN. A WIDO W. AND THE HEIRS AT LAW OF HENRY H. TOBIN. DECEASED. O. 37 LOCATED IN PARTS OF SECTIONS 17. 18 AND 20. DESIGNATED AS CLAIM N TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH. RANGE 5 EAST. WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN. IN KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON, DEFINED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT 60 FEET WEST OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF BLOCK 24 ON. ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF. RECORDED IN VOLUME OF THE TOWN OF RENT 1 OF PLATS. PAGE 135. IN KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON; THENCE SOUTH 16.5 FE ET; THENCE WEST 109.5 FEET TO THE NORHTERN PACIFIC RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WA Y; THENCE NmTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID RIGHT OF EAST 109.5 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 283.5 FEET TO THE POINT THE NORTH 62 FEET THEREOF. WAY 300 FEET; THENCE OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT TAX PARCEL N UMBERS 77 BURNETT AVENUE SO UTH: 000720014802 95 BURNETT AVENUE SO UTH: 000720007301 RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL Date: Date: Date: Date: Last Saved on Sun Oct 032004 ot 2:34pm by 8m Helsley FI'le Name: R: \Projects\131 (TSA Architecfs)\OOI-04 (Parkside ot 95 Bumetf)\OWj\.sheets\PB-tI01.dwg Scale: 20 SEC. 17., T. 23 N., R. 5E, W.M. PARKSIDE AT 95 BURNETT SITE PLAN ENTITLEMENT 12 00 ~ z , 13 R 4 October 5, 2004 prepared for TSA ARCHITECTS VICINITY MAP 7 'C z ~ NTON M NICIP z z Z .. <;l AI PORT ~ ~ ~ ~ "-N 6TH ST ~ ~ z ~ • z g " • w w ~ " > z ~ • l :;> , ST > ~ • ST z • ~"" ? ,;< SW 7TH ST ~ sw 16Tl-1 prepared by Site Development Associates, LLC 10116 Main Street, Suite 106; Bothell, Washington 98011 w -----,--"-"-"--- Office: 425.486.6533 Fax: 425.486.6593 www.sdaengineers.com APPLICANT: ENGINEER: SURVEYOR: SHEET INDEX SHEET Cl.0 TITLE SHEET C2.0 SITE PLAN C3.0 UTILITIES PLAN TSA Architects Kent Smutny 50 116th Ave SE, Suite 201 Bellevue, W A 98004 Phone: (425) 401-6828 Site Development Associates, LLC William Helsley, P.E. 10116 Main Street, Suite 106 "'1!'6t1ielt,· WA -98011 Phone: (425) 488-8533 BASELINE Engineering, INC. 1910 64th Avenue West Tacoma, WA 98466 Phone: (253) 565-4491 TITLE C4.0 DRAINAGE CONTROL PLAN DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON DEC 1 72004 RECEIVED • 0 I .- 0 0 I .- '" .- • o o t\I .. C 0 ... .9-... 0 (I) GI a .. >-co (I) ... II! a ~ ~ CD c .... :::l m 1.0 Oi) ~ « CD "'C .-en ~ "-as Q. z 0 (f) '> w '" w z :J r r- '" w "-a '" a. I "-s "" I~ '" I':::: « 3: c o ... c GI a: . o ,.j .J N - o o ... c GI E c. o GI > GI a (I) ... ... . -c. o o TITLE SHEET SHEET NO. C1.0 ;(iJ=========1 -... o ... L.. ______ --' 200327 ~ Q) _ s:: .- ) Q) _ s:: - \ ) Q) _ .s:: . ;-6 , ....., } '0 r 4 BURNETT AVENUE SOUTH \ () -----rB ~ BUlL ING >v So V / __ ------.--:::::==~----------)] • 4 1 1 1 1 1 _I c::J1 c::J1 c::il '-DI 1 1 1 1 1 1 ·L .4 • . ~ . ".. : 41 .• ;4 . _~ ~" "', .; .4 • A· j . ~ . 4 ' . .:1" . ~:.' -: .:" ." •••• <1' .' • -4" ' ~ • ~.' .6. '4" '. :!::':t:::='===..~ . 4«1' .t-,,· '<lq . ,. .. q. • ," '! :. ~ . . ... . " .4. A •. ' .. " .. -. ·4 , .4 ~ ,.- -1iiiii+" .... ·l'JIl!IfII!h;;=fl"l1ll!it ~ ~~~ ~ I \ ./ ~IDE~ eE1UEEN euILDINCir,6ND ---' FROf'OERTY LINE AS eHOUN C) V·/ -- I SYMBOL ~, STREET LEVEL PLANT SCHEDULE COMMON NAME AU'IlJMN F\R"LE ASI-I ~STOCF!AT FEA~ COI..UI1NA~ TULIP 'MEE 60T ANICAI... NAME FFW<INUS A. '.J\.INGINGER' FYRIS c. 'ARISTOCF!AT' LIFIODENDRON T. 'FASTIGIATUM' FENNISETUM sP. 'H,oIMELIN' SIZE 2' cal., Be, 12' MIn. f.It. 2' cal., Be, 12' Min. !-It. 1-112' cal. 6e, 10' MIn. !-It. 1 GAL.. • ~ TIAII.I.AN eRAH6LE ..ueus CAL YCINOIDE& 1 Gal., "". ot;. 1-........ ·1 ........... .......... . . . . . . . . . . . SYMBOL o o SII~ o FE~IALS WIN I EFiC1'i£t:t"ER I Gal., "". OJ;. FINE LAUN l-I'T"DR06EED SUGGESTED CONTAINER PLANTS COMMON NAME GOLDCfiEST CYPRESS ALPlNEFI~ NEW ZEALAND FLAX lEW ZEALAND FLAX DWAFif' f'OTl.lEFiGlLLA KELSEYI DOGWOOD SEDUM FU5Cl4IA WILDS~ WINTE~ THYME o 5' 10' 20' ru -----...,1 1 BOTANICAl... NAME COfOHUS !COUSA ACE~ JA"'ONIClN 'FULL 1'fOC4II' ~M.~T' ABIES LAsIOCAAPA Pf.IOIiIMIlII"I TENAX ' YELLOW WAVE' Pf.IOFNIUM TENAX ' JACK SPf;!AT' SEDUM YAR 'AU'IlJMN JOY' FU5Cl4IA '6ARteI'1EIS~' ~UMsP. COLEUS '$OLAA SIJoIRfSE' FRAGERIA Cf.IILOENSIS E\.ICN'T1'U F. 'EI"ERALD GAEIn-' ..ueus CAl.. YCINOIDES THYMUSYAR 40' SCALE: 1-= ·10' 6e 6e Be Be 6e SIZE 3 GAL. 3 GAL. 3 GAL. 3 GAL. 3 GAL. 3 GAL. POTS POTS POTS POTS 3 GAL. 3 GAL. 3 GAL • 3 GAL. (U-H ECF Design Two Four/Two Six, Inc. ,... 2821 Northup Way, Suite 225 Bellevue, WA 98004 ph. (425) 881-2426 fax (425) 576-5229 +-_ ....... --1-www.design2426.com Landscape Architecture • Athletic Field Design· lnigatlon Planning BURNETT 95 Renton, WA Design Team 'V~0104 ___ :::Re:.:.VI:::·si:::on=s'--___ _ DeeGriptlon Key Plan Registration STATE Of WASHINGTON ~ CERTFlCATE NO. m. Sheet Title LANDSCAPE PLAN Sheet No. L-1.1 ~ , " ~ _____ l I I I I I I 0-'r --L • I 'i' r (.;L m I o f-----, ~ i ., I 0-r---+- ~ -' III o , .. , STANDARD i --- - --~- II I BTNllDARDi ~-" ARC'1~:_ 1 1/ ., KE~ ~TE WASHINGTON Date: o I I , I I I By. Descriptoo \ A 6 9:::14'-0" o o o , o o z x e ./ - --~------ f---------f-~~ I Ed:·······'·;····· ',.,;/ -----, , , ~ -' " •• • • (0 0 0 c0 0 0 0 0 0 G 8 (0 (0 0 0 8 0 (3 S @ GARAGE LEVEL 2 PLAN SC.ALE, 9/92"= I '-0" BUILDING PLAN SHEET NO, Parkside at 95 Burnett TSA' h' arc z tee t s, p,ll" A2.2 50 116tb Avenue S,£. Suite 201 Bellevue, ViA 98004 Colpitts Development Co. LLC. R8Ilton,WA T 425.401.6828 F 425.401.0630 www.tsaarchlteets.com. 200327 D:.vFi r)p,,1C , ";"'.:."" '.c~ ~ ... - --(2) --8 8\. 0/ A B o 9:24'-0" o o 1'-CI~" 11'-0' 19,'-0" 11'-0' 11'-0" I 16'-0" 11'-0" 19'-0" 11'-0" L 19'-0" I 11'-0" i. 19'-0" 11'-0" 19'-0" 14'-0" 15'-0" 11'-0" 19'-0' 11'-0'" 19'-0" 11'-0" I. 19'-0" 11'-0" I 15'-0" 11'-0" 11'-0' 19'-0' II'-o"~" 1 ~ 0 ;~-~. i~:f,~ ~--.... ~~-~ ~-~V-"i .. ~ I '1 i'i-'! II.!.: , 9 q ," 1 '-1-: . I // // --,'l -~ -. . i '.~,' I '~~II .' r--\j 1 i ' ,,-( !,-rf-TI--'-11-rrlltt-M"7"O_-.~-t_ t T-~--' -+. h-: -.. --;·~/I.-+-~<0 11/ / / I, ,.' ..... Lf',;' c_________ UNIT ~ T.H. ~ower I~N'T ~ T.H. Lower I~NIT ~ ~H: Lower U' l __ + ___ --I ,'/" / / , '/, , .' --U--N-I-T--C-"T' H LI " IUNIT B T.H. ~o~1l!..... UNIT ~ T.H.: Lower ",NIT B T.H.ILCjwrcer=!II---U-N--IT---W T H L " II' I i II / UNIT" T.H. Lower : @I] , : : mIl : 04 NIT C T.H. Lo,!¥er ' , r' " . . pwer '" [ill] 1 ' E= ;~: : ~:' F q . . ower 1 , V/:/( § i 11i=l=, {!=~ : [!ill ii, i i! ~ , ~ I ,r elOer OPE:N SPAC-E /\1; L=t· ~ I ' I 1 I ~ I! Ii, e-! [!ill F===\p!1~~11 I! !:/// ,:;< ~ ~ / I : ~ 'I~! : I ~ c _____ ~-::-,c c-, ~ c_ --r::-~ ~! I }fifl I "D •• " ;/ ~~:fJ~ I ~I •.... ~ i-::-------J • ~ = __ : ____ J p ~-------J , ~ !~_~ 1 "~I ~ ~ , II ( /?/, I b'-'" i r-;-~I i 1 0 ~ ~ 0 ~"; 0 I ~:, ~ I I / :rMli':' 'I ... I I~ l I ~ I 0 T~ ! 0 ~ lOx I" ' I i //" .,i/'· / ':""\. ' -, ~, / "Co!,! r--. , '''<?l " I " 'I .• ':<"111->, ,'" II' / '.fJT ' ' \ " _~·.'r " '\ / .~.y, / k;» i -> II~ Vi IF\ II. ; ~J IF\ II. J Ir\ II 0 J :1 / II~ V ,/[1~b;P IV~ II 1<-:t~ _II :11 t ! _II ?1 t _II !(JV~II 1\ <-i'Ff,b#t--j1 ~ ----0 / J , ~ _ _ rr='E, 51 __ ~ , " -! r-. "' / CH!/TI!~-'._ • I I I i /; / . . "'"' i, ,>~/I/~'//»)U iii i 4 -~-~ : /7 1/' .---.~ II -~-~-. i I: ,i I U-X. I I I: :>" /</1"-I :l~ I I ! I I I I I I I // i / I ~ i H .i 70 71 k 73 7. ! 11 ,. I 71 I 71 ,.1 10 8'1 J:z sa i M 85 88 i 87 I I~ , ~ -L...r:\4 ~'~~==~~' ~==TD: .. ~ I ~ I ~ j : I "" STANDARD ao STANDARD i k: .</> i ", "" II' I 8TANDARD 8TANi 8TANDARD 8TANDARD 8TjDARD 8TANDARD STANDNIl 8T~DARD 8T NO: STANDARD i c X· ~' 8TANDARD 8TANj STANIIAIID ' 8TANDARD STjDARD 8TAN1 STANDARD STANDARD 8TAN! STANDARD I ' r . , '" 'I '" 'fl I • /~n i ; I: I I i I I ii' -, ! il;> ~\i'" ~ :20k. :,; , .: // //" ~<: 'I' ' " "I~ == '" -+: ---I , it~/ i 1 1__ ~I __ ~ ____ 1 ___ c--" .... ,.1 _~ __' / ' ___ 1 ____ --f--__ ;:"',L:':--'!4, -:-~ _____ :_ _ . __ ~I ~_~___ I I, __ '-__ y" ~~/f .. --'-:\.-~-~ ~---~ ~ ~-... '8TAN~D 8TAN~D STAN".i-1 STAN~D STJDARD ST..:..J STAN~~ aT~~D aT'~ STAN~RD !I:= ~~ /~/./ :'" 11 ~~! :;1 ~,F ~~ STAN~D 8T~I' J~ 8TAN~AHD STAN~I STM~I' ~AN~D STk:I:~STM~D -STAN~ -1AN~ --~--, 2:l -ST':AHD i STAN~D I / ~ 1/ hi' 1 I '// ..•. hCOIIPMrr Ill! CO':ACT / "i " , " , STANo...", • h, , [, " I, " I, ':, I I }-~ ~ . I - I I I I ------ r/ ~)'1 ~, " '1"-. 0 --~~-~------+-~ __ --i ______ ~ ___ : -~---+---~-----i~-~ __ ~ __ ~ __ L~_~_ --.-------, -COM!~t---: ",{"~ --~ ----~ -~t--i---~ --~--~~ --+------~t ~--~ -+-------+--~--~ -t-------+------+---"------:--~.~r--... ~; )~1/ \ "'-I~\\, i'----~.--... ~----!~-~-,-~-~-'~ I ... ~-;-------·~----:~-+5-0",--&,.o;-l-·~~-t.·--_89~l~ofA~bSTldd...s~~8-~&N9AR~~MP~~~-~' ' .~-~ !r~---~~-~-~---I ~-~-~:------r--: ~-.. --~:-- \..'../ >--::;:c -" \ . '~" ' ------~--. -'-. --"-----. -------'. --- -----~ -:-.. --67 STALLS ACCESSIBLE FROM DRIVE AISLE,-. L .. _u_: :" 1-----: ----__ .d ___ --.;-- -------;-~- I L_~ I 0 ,i 5' {-_..": I . 0\ 10 l--''''''''' +-_! - I I I r---~·m·~' -----~-~ r---~·TT~-----~~-r---~ -i---- I L I I I I .L_ --~-----~ rr'---- I I i I I I I I I I I 1 2 a " ~ .. • 7 • I' 10 11 I 12 ! 1$ 14 ! 111 i. -q 11 I 18 20 I 21 22 .... ~D I 24 • 9ll-I I '''~Jl_ 21 ao I 31 32 aa 34 31 38 37 I 18 I • ,", STANDARD STANDARD STA/IIDARD ST~ IJTANDARD STANDARD STANIIARJ) STANDARD STANDARD ST~ STANDAR~ STANDARD ST,\NDARD III i"oNID IJTANDAHD IJTANDARD STAN~ STANDARD STANDARD STANDARD i STANDARD STANDARD g,~ AAfl STANDARD sr,wDARD !!l r: . .,.~ STANDARD ST",DAAD STANDARD STANDARD STANDARD STANIIAAD aTMDARD STAN .... D STANDARD 8TANDARD r> //~1.!h::b==::J,±===!::=<=F! =::::!:===~==:::::::!===~==r:::::!~==11!===:::!:==j:=:=!:===ti d::===~=fI==~=f9=! ~===::!:ct; ==~=c::t=1 c:j=!:=:::==:!:cri ======ti ===~=t: =:::!::===i:::r!:===::!:::q::1 =:::::!=::::6:=t=:rI:::===b:i==:::::!:=:t:f1 =~==d=:=! ==::::::!==1F==!::==="*===:!:::,,9!==::!:::==1 :c!!::===:=!':=f' ==~..r:!.l _-.,>I~+-,r8 ar STANDARD I> /~. I, ~ , ~ I ! : ~ ___ . ____ ,1, _____ _+~--~ . i: !, ~ 8 _-.L,"-__ L/L../_' -:--:-;.---"-.-----~_+,-----:--------~----+, -.-_~. __ .L.' ---_+I----~-~~-+-I--------+-----·TI--i-.1 --·------'------'1 ---·---'I----'-------f-'I ---+----.-----'-----+'-------;-------i-----:'------.--.--.~-J .. ---''Ir+ . 10 • !,2'-2%', , I I .. '9' ~" ' ' .' I ,I', I I! I ." 1'~~" ?( ~ 11'-0' 1"-0" I 11'-0' 11'-0" IS'.<J" 11'-0" 19'-0" 11'-0" 19'-0" 11'-0" 19'-0" 11'-0" ......, 14'-0" 19'-0" 11'-0" 19'-0" 11'-0" 13'-0" 11'-0" IS'-Q" 11'-0" 19'-0" 11'-0" I 11'-0' 19·...Q' 11'-0' J. " ., ., ! 1 1 " 324'-0" '1 "'I 'I --o o J N GARAGE LEVEL 1 PLAN SCALE: B/B2"=I'-0" Date: By: DescrPIDn ~ Parkside at 95 Burnett AHCoH'lt" , v ..,. ~~ ~ .. ~TEOF ""' Colpitts Development Co. LLC. 1 ., 1 ., u x z TSA'a rc h i Ie cis, p,ll. 50 116rb Avenue S.E. Suite 201 Bellevue. WA 98004 , Ranton,WA T 425.401.6828 F 425.4D1.0630 www.rsaarchittcts.com •• ; i ;h'r,'·" , Ci~; I ! @ BUILDING PLAN SHEET NO. A2.1 200827 o Scale 1" = 20' 10 20 30 40 Tree Tree DBH Height Spread/ LCR Condition # Sp (In) (ft) Dripline (%) Ratinq Tree Condition Notes/Impacts 1 1 PSME 1 1 35 15 80 1 Very good condition/crown could be affected 12 PSME 8 20 10 75 1 Very good condition/crown could be affected 13 PSME 10 35 15 75 1 Very qood condition/crown could be affected 14 PINI 1 1 20 15 75 1 Very qood condition/crown could be affected 15 PINI 10 20 15 75 1 Very qood condition/crown could be affected 16 PINI 20 30 22 80 1 Very qood condition/crown could be affected 20 PINI 17 20 22 75 1 Very qood condition/crown could be affected 21 PINI 14 20 17 80 1 Very good condition/crown could be affected 22 PINI 14 25 20 80 1 Very good condition/crown could be affected 23 PINI 15 25 20 80 1 Very qood condition/crown could be affected 26 CULE 22 35 25 85 1 Very qood condition/crown could be affected 27 PSME 15 35 30 70 1 Very qood condition/crown could be affected 28 PSME 16 35 30 70 1 Very good condition/crown could be affected 29 PSME 14 30 30 75 1 Very good condition/no im-.pacts noted .. Tree # -Number of tree as Identified on the accompanying map Tree Sp -Tree species tricode ACRU=Acer rubrum (red maple) CULE=x Cupressocyparis leylandii (Leyland Cypress) PINI=Pinus nigra (Austrian pine) PSME=Pseudotsuga menziesii (Douglas fir) Dbh -Diameter in inches at 4.5' above the existing grade Height -Approximate height of tree in feet Spread/Dripline -Maximum crown spread/dripline diameter in feet LCR (Live crown ratio) -The percentage of trunk area/length with live branch material. LCR values less than 35 are considered low. Condition Rating -An arbitrary value relating to the condition and hazard potential of the tree based upon health and defects, and assuming presence of a target 1 -Excellent condition 2 -Good condition 3 -Fair condition, retention allowed provided impacts aren't extensive 3.5 -Fair health, however conditions may warrant removal 4 -Poor condition, removal recommended Tree Condition Notes -Specific information on condition of the evaluated tree ........... c ..• •·· ". ' .• RETAIN/ REMOVE RETAIN RETAIN RETAIN RETAIN RETAIN RETAIN RETAIN RETAIN RETAIN RETAIN RETAIN RETAIN RETAIN RETAIN TREE CONDITION EVALUATION AND IMPACT MAP Parkside at 95 Burnett · .. · ............. o:·~ Renton, WA " ' •...•. ~~~" •. c"~."".,,.Ju .....•...................... =c· ... ·.····c ••......... · ... ~+ .•..•... c.~) ............... . ~.' ,-' . #12 - #16 ...... .<<.. #20 Arboricultural Consulling Tony Shoffner Consulting Arborist, Horticulturist ISA Certified Arborist #PN-0909 Member, American Society of Consulting Arborists PO Box 135 Mountlake Terrace, W A 98043-0135 Phone and Fax: (425) 776-0850 Mobile (206)755-2871 email: arboricultural.consulting@verizon.net .-........... "1 #29 ....... . . -: ~.-,.::--- DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON DEC 1 72004 RECEIVED TREE EVALUATION AND IMPACT MAP PARKS/DE A T BURNETT 95 ~eet #L-1.2 ~te: October 18, 2004 rthony V. Shoffner_ CITY OF RENTON, WA Colpitts Development Company, LLC 2256 38th PI. East Seattle, WA 98112 I A Certified Arborist #PN-0909A; Member, American Society of Consulting Arborists ----._----- o B G o A B o ~YMt:sUL~ &. Lt:l:it:NU: EXHAUST FAN -SEE SEGTION AO FOR ENERGY GOMPLIANGE. IIOY SMOKE DETEGTOR, -V'V' DISGONNEGTION SV'lITGH 4 BATTERY BAGKUP D INDIGATES V'lALL TYPE, -SEE V'lALL SCHEDULE. SHT A4.1. INDIGATE5 90"x48" MANEUVERING SPACE AT BATHROOM. TYP. AT TYPE 'B' DV'lELLING UNITS (ONE BATHROOM EAGH UNIT). A EMERGENc.Y LIGHT. /~-,,\ <,--> INDIGATES V'lINDOV'l TYPE, i \ INDIGATE5 60" DIAMETER UNOBSTRUGTED -SEE V'lINDOV'l SGHEDULE. SHT A4.2. \ / FLOOR SPAGE. '-~ ( ) INDICATES DOOR TYPE, '----5EE DOOR 5c.HEDULE. 5HT A4.9. tEXIT! ILLUMINATED EXIT 51GN AS NOTED. --._---------_._----- I Y~Il,;AL ~LAN NU I t:~: I. DIMENSIONS ARE TO THE FACE OF STlJP (F.O.S.), FACE OF CONCRETE (F.O.C.), FACE OF POST (F.O.P.) OR CENTERLINE OF PARTY V'lALLS U.N.O. VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS. 2. EXTERIOR V'lALLS TO BE :2xe> STUPS, TYP. (UNO.). INTERIOR V'lALLS TO BE :2x4 STUDS, TYP. (U.N.OJ ALL CONSTRlJCTION TO BE ONE HOUR FIRE RATED TYP. (U.N.O.). 9. FOR FLOORICEILINCS AND ROOF/CEILINCS TYPES AND ASSEMBLIES, SEE BUILDINCS SECTIONS IN SECTION Ab. 4. FOR PLATE HEICSHTS SEE BUILDING SECTIONS IN SECTION A6 AND CORE SEGTIONS IN SECTION A'I. tlUILUINl:i ~LAN NU I t:ti: I. SEE INDIVIDUAL UNIT FLOOR PLANS IN SEGTION A:'l FOR DETAILED INFORMATION. (DIMENSIONS, CONSTRUCTION, DOORl""NDO"', ETG.) 2. SEE ENLARGED STAIRIELEVATOR CORE DRAI"/INCSS IN SECTION M FOR DETAILED INFORMATION .!DETAILS, CONSTRlJCTION, DOORl",'NDO"', ETC) 9. FROFERTY LINES SHOiI'lN FOR 5ENERAL INFORMATION ONLY. SEE SITE PLAN ON SHEET ALI FOR PLACEMENT OF BUILDIN5. 4. THE BUILDINCS IS TO BE FIRE SPRINKLERED THROUGHOUT. 5. 5EE SITE PLAN IN SECTION AI FOR DETAILED INFORMATION OR SITE FEA"T1JRES. Ii", GARDEN iI'lALLS, PILASTEF1.5, PLANTERS, iI'lALK5, 5TEPS, ETG.) o 0 8 0 ~ 0 ,,0 0 0 0 ~ ~ V'I 0 Y Z 8 ~ "-,rl!." .JI'::Q" '13'-0' 11'-0" 11'-0", 13'-0" 11'-0' 13'-0" 11'-0" 10'-0" 11'-0' i '9'-0" II'-Q'.1 ~ '4'.0", 19'-0' 11'-0", ~',O' J"-O" 19'-0", 11'-0' ~,..!I',o· ~ 11'-0' II'-O".i 19'-0" 11'-0" I 1· . '!! 1 i ':' I-'L' : -----'--1------J-----------------·1 ________________ -',_ . ______ I-_______ ~---____ '_ ________ ..., _______ + __________ <_ ------'--------i---------.... -------j--c+ -~, '-~ --~-------~---------------~-------~---------------------~-------, I I 8\+-,,:~~~~=1_-_--=---------------r-------~~~~-----... --. :; ---.' ... " :-.=~_... __ =-----' -t-------.-----------.-----------,----------·--... tc! .,.=-=--.-=.L ... ~I! ......... --= .. = _~i ___ ._ -.__' .--'-! ! ... .... u -1-------~I ______ ---t_--;.'\r+_.r(0 0-~ ! --,--------1--; : ----... -;~,------i---! -;----"i--:--'="-" ---~ ----:---cT--"-' ---c.-"-,"-----;' --i~: . ------.---, -.. r:'~: .. .-: ;-'-€) I~ i ' : ! ii!c':'~_=·_· .-._.J.. .~=::::I~' .j:i I :: I I::: I I, "!I" ........••. 'i ........•..• I I I +-I I I I I :, ' : I' i!!!!' ii, I I i. ..... . ...•.•. I , ...........•. +.. I" ' i: " I ' I j ......• ... I ~ -- -- -t---. -,\:3 , /] 'i t-----~··-{~l/i ~-!-! ~~~~.--I~~====~;====i~=====-~~:~--~~=~~'-~t 1 ~.=.~ .. =.~--~t---=~=-~I===~r~==~====~i-==~!~===~-·--I--t~~'I=~-~·L~I~--_~~,~t I t! F===='~I i i ',B: ~ .....: ,'.; ~ I' ~ ",,-'~I~ F""'=="""9~=="""'f;;,,~ i! : I ' ............. ~ ~, -.- i !, ",' -; i! ,~~ i i · ·~V I ..... ~ ! ii' i : ~ !,.···· ...... ··-··n-,--+------7-'-+-v-;;r---' ! i ,I'· V'r:': I:i • I. ,,'! I , I i I ~:~.w ~' -"il II '. / '. r ~MIN.2' . . ----P .!!,-~ ," --~Ii I --.~ i!.", ----! .' ~Ir . 1 I I· I ' .1 I <"",C" I -~mm I I : I I I I j "':':':'-:.::C:,c I ~ _ _. ___ _ " 'l'=-ill "11/ i, ,J] if I I .""'V I , . I _[_ ----'c ~lr<············ H --~ .............. ~ j .. , , I , 1 I' . , ~ ~-- - ----+- :t I .-.. ,----t-- .......... .. "-qv,,' 11'-0" I A 000008000 G 00008000 08@ ROOF PLAN SC.ALE: 5/32"=1'-0" Date: B" DescrPm ~?O RE~~~~D Parkside ARCHI CT ~L~-p /" --, t~ --:;-;;,,, 1/ T'KE~ ~TE F wASHINGTON Colpitts Development Co. LLC. w at 95 Burnett TSA'a r chi tee t s, p.Uc. 50 116tb Avenue S.B. Suite 201 Bellevue, WA 98004 Rantol\WA T 425.401.6828 F 425.41)1.0630 www.tsa'llrcrurccts.com • DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON DEC 1 72004 RECEIVED BUILDING PLAN SHEEr NO. A2.7 200327 1---0 I I I 1 r \ r I ~ , ~ :r '" N UNITC !Jill UNIT B 1 [}ill UNIT B ~ UNIT B i ~ 7 A B UNIT B2 UNITC Qill Q!2J I/' ~YMtsUL~ & Lt:.(;it:.NU: lEI EXHAUST FAN, -SEE SECTION AO FOR ENER5Y COMPLIANCE. o IIOV SMOKE DETECTOR, -V'(! DISCONNECTION SV'!ITCH ~ 6A TTERY 6AC-KUP D INDICATES V'!ALL TYPE, -SEE I'!ALL SC-HEDULE. SHT A4.1. m EMER5ENC-Y LI6HT. ~-, ~ ,. \ INDICATES 50"x4B" MANEUVERIN5 SPACE AT BATHROOM. TYP. AT TYPE '6' DV'lELLlN5 UNITS (ONE BATHROOM EACH UNIT). < > INDICATES I'!INDOI'! TYPE, (I INDICATES 60" DIAMETER UNOBSTRUCTED '-. -~. -SEE I'!INDOV'! SCHEDULE. SHT A4,2. \ / FLOOR SPACE. ( ) INDICATES DOOR TYPE, ~~ -SEE DOOR SCHEDULE, SHT A4.9. ~-~-- UNIT B2 ~ '-~ IEXITI ILLUMINATED EXIT SI5N AS NOTED. UNIT C-BF 1 320 1 I YtJlliAL tJLAN NU I t:.~: I. DIMENSIONS ARE TO THE FAGE OF STUD (F.0.5.)" FAGE OF CONCRETE (F.O.C), FACE OF POST (F.O.P.) OR CENTERLINE OF PARTY ~ALLS UN.O. VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS. 2. EXTERIOR ~LS TO BE 2x6 STUDS, TYP. (U.NO) INTERIOR ~LS TO BE 2x4 STUDS, TYP. (U.N.O.). ALL CONSTRUCTION TO BE ONE HOUR FIRE RATED TYP. (U.N.O.). 5. FOR FLOOR/CEILINcS> AND ROOF/CEILINcS> TYPES AND A55EMBLIES, SEE BUILDINcS> SECTIONS IN SECTION At;. 4, FOR PLATE HEIcS>HTS SEE BUILDINcS> SECTIONS IN SECTION At> AND C-ORE SECTIONS IN SECTION A~. UNITB UNIT B [ill] Qill tsUILUIN(;i tJLAN NU I t:.::;: I. SEE INDIVIDUAL UNIT FLOOR PLANS IN SECTION A~ FOR DETAILED INFORMATION. (DIMENSIONS, CONSTRUCTION, DOOR/~INDO~, ETC.) 2. SEE ENLAR6ED STAIRIELEVATOR CORE DRA~IN55 IN SECTION M FOR DETAILED INFORMATION .(DETAILS, C-ONSTRUCTION, DOOR/I'IINDO~, ETG) 5. PROPERTY LINES SHO~N FOR cS>ENERAL INFORMATION ONLY_ SEE SITE PLAN ON SHEET AI.! FOR PLACEMENT OF BUILDIN5. 4. THE BUILDINcS> IS TO BE FIRE SPRINKLERED THROUcS>HOUT. S. SEE SITE PLAN IN SECTION AI FOR DETAILED INFORMATION OR SITE FEATURES. (i", cS>ARDEN Y'tALLS, PILASTERS, PLANTERS, ~ALKS, STEPS, ETC.) @ I •• • .... " ..... , .. I -, .... DD , I Ii>==~==-~-~-~-+;i---- ---:---~ . ----~-- _______ ~ ___ ~ _~_ ~J , UNIT B I 323 I II~~ UNIT E [}ill UNITC Qill ~ C LJ C S: C L ! I J.i==F~=~=-~~-'=~=~=~--~=1=~~~==c!l --________ ~ ___ ~~~~==='L_ __ _____1'=»!=====<>====='_!____--~.hE=~=c!.L---'=k='3E"==c!L. --I-A ----(:) --8 ~ I ,I i I I I ! 10 l----'~r_~~__+---~---~:----~-+' ~---------'i--------------------~-----+-' ·--------i'I---+ .. -,r-------.---,------1--.-____ , __________ L' ----.--.----',----------;,------------'--------,---------,-----~-----,----'----_________________________ --J'L __ -"'1<-4---( 10 ill I ill I 1 1 J-..!1'~-4I~.'__j:==III-o=' =~'::==='B'=-<J=" ==1==11'-0=:'==1==11'-0=" =!::=='=:B'-o=" =::i' =='="-<J="=::t=='B:='-o="=='r=="='-o:::' =+=='B='-o:::' ==+'==111-0=' =~'::=='=B'-o=" ==t==,=,'-o='==t=:j~'B~'''''='=' ==+==i'4~'-o~'~=:+'=='~9'-o=" =j:==,=,'-o="=::i=='B='-o="==;==,,='-o="=:::t=='B='''''=''=~::=~'''~-o:::'' =+=='9':=-0:::" =::i==,=,'-o="==t=='9='''''=''==t:=,,=:'-o=''==t==,=:,'-o='==t=='9='-0="==t==":='-o=" =f'" . 'I 'I 1 1 'I 'I -, 'I 924'-0" 'I -,-" 'I '! 1 1 1 T 00000000008000000008000 0e@ @ RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 2 PLAN (LEVELS 3 AND 4 SIM.) SC.ALE: 5/52"=1'-0" Date: 8)( DesaiJtioo ~.oo_ Parkside at 95 Burnett ARCHlJrCT / VAl Af.,./IJ. ,..-/ - / ~~~~';NY STATE"~ WASHINGTON Colpitts Development Co. LLC. TSA'a r chi tee t s, p.", 50 116th Avenue S.E. Suite 201 Bclk::vuc, WA 98004 Rel\ton,WA T 425.401.6828 F 425.4ll1.0630 www.tsa-atcrutccts.com DEVELOPMENT PLANNING C'TY OF RENTON DEC 1 72004 RECEIVED BUILDING PLAN SHEET NO, A2.4 =' 200327