The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA-05-013-o tn o ~ ~ ..... ~ z···· ~ ~ ZONING PIBIPW TlCllNICAL SEllVICIS UlOf/03 CDR ~~i~H'J~~i~r:-! i l_J !Hm_--~~~::;:;:::~= ::~J~-:.:-~-J-:=- ····· .. ···_···,··_···· .. ·F·· .. -; I I r.:::::.~~_- , .. - - - -Renton dity IJmittl 31 T24N R5E E 1/2 SUI ZONING MAP BOOK RBSIPENTlAL ~ Resource Conservation ~ ReBldential 1 dulac ~ Residential 5 dulac ~ ReBldential 8 dulac , RMH I Residential Manufactured Homes I "-10 I ReBldential 10 dulac I R-14 I Residential." dulac I "H-I I Residential Multi-Family InlilI I RM-NI Residential Multi-Family Neighborhood Center IRM-C l Residential Multi-Family Suburban Center MIXED USE CENTER ~ center Nei,hborbood· @] Center Suburban· ~C-Nl) Urban Cenler -North ~ Urban Center -North 2 ~ Center Downtown· §] Center Office Residential COMMERCIAL @ Commercial Arterial· ~ Commercial Office· [££J Convenience Commercial INDUSTRIAL~ W IndUStri1~ Heavy ~ ~ In~u.tri -Medium ~ f'~\ 0] In -IJgh~E.'-Of'~ ~E.~ O€ C\~ V' (P) PUbli~ l \ 1.'U\fl ___ Renton Cit" IJmits ~~~ ___ Adjacent City IJmlts 1!.~\I~t) _ Book Page. Boundary ~ ~ C~ KROll PAGE IRH-T I Residential Multi-Family Traditional IRH-U I Residential Multi-Family Urban Center· • May include Overlay Districts. See AppendiJ: maps. For additional regulations in Overlay Districts, please see Rye 4-3. PAGE# INDEX SECTrrOWNIRANGE Renton Renton City Limits o Parcels ~ Renton Aerial SCALE 1 : 476 I I 20 0 20 40 60 FEET 1ttp:llrentonnet.org/MapGuide/maps/Parcel. mwf 05 013 DEVelOPMENT PlANNING CITY OF RENTON JAN 3 1 2005 RECEIVED N A Monday, November 01, 2004 9:06 AM .... c " " 0 ~ (;> \I :! . ~ \4 ~ '0 r\ " l> J - ~ /"' -.f\ 0 \ a ~ ui "7 'Ct 0 \ o .1\ ~ ('0 t!f \,,) piJ ~~~ !1 c.-~ -,l.M 0 JJ..J..,.,. t- / I ''-../ I / \ lll) \ \ 3.'." ~ \ ,~~ 0 0 OJ"'tP -:;,- ~G"" ~f4 ~ . -j:.- :ty \J>1 J4"~ .o{\ ~ " 0 r;::'1 \lJl; 1 , ."r oj. -:$ ~ ~ ~o1. " J ~ ~ \ ~ ~o '0 ",--, C> ~L~ 0 ~ y n G\--~ Yo V" ~o~ I, ()o t~ 0---!oJ--;:T :!~~ ':' I>" I~ ..oJ , 0 () -~ <C t; 'ii y-o j 1-V\. \ cl \ Vl 1 d- tf" 'V1 ~ ~ \ {;P ~ ~ ® -r-=J 0 ~ :;:- ~ n e t> 1. ;;r. u1 - 0 \ "7 / ,-(Yo 6 C! 0 ~ .. ¥ \ C}-U h '>-. ~ 1\1 ';t-,..I 1 -" [!. ", 1-1.1 0 'o~ II 1 ~~ fls:v ~ ~ o.l 110:-' -::' ::s P- -0 t6 \1l ~> IYJ ~ Q.. V ~ !J ~ -:J &,r-:-(Y - ~O~\ L'\~~ \)L~ ~\~. ~ \ \) E. '" \'\:.:-....\-..\ E. L c. \r~\ \C~ ") 1~'4 \)~'PI \), \...$ B<...\.~'(~ \0 ~~?POR.l. -s. t:. ~ If/' 0 t;, '"C 0 ~ \ c..'lll\'~o 'j:..~-:...-~ -----+PII~ I:l 0 ~ \4:>\ ,. ~l.. ~ L ~'" A~ ~ ~ 00\ \>9It) q' ?O\l.l ~ i. YlI.c. 'N \illt :SoL~~ ?,i\~"C.LI..... Hip /%...4 (J lie -.. sol'(l ~ I 1= ~ F f -~? rJ D frlG GI-rs orJ LA f~ ~ fb urJs fc. 0FiF b 0 ~ reel .~~ ~ ~ ) , , ru~~~E.. ~ ?R\\\~\E. ~O1'l\ t(\ObQ..~~~ ~ S't)~fH~E.. '$ ~\t.t. W\. : C OE~ ..1 \. 65 ~s1, \ ~ \ ~ R\)"S-P~O\>E:.~\'.l o"+\.\-\e.~ . \) -1..} p~:\$..'O~~- c:l.So, tl\t;M~\f\\~ \\I\'~.IN 'f\$. 'K-e.\\\l)\.\ ("\)...\ ..... ~ ~o 5 \) ;~o?o~w .• T.. ~c;.\i\l.L R TO~"\ \...'\r..-\ ~\f"I\\~~ I '!:.l-\. ~ l~¥"~·~~~\\\",,-\G...1Q·~ ~\ ; ~~'t-\ \0\-\ c...ot.\. ~ i'-l ~ \(' ~~ A~~I...\.C..P,\4.1'! ~\~~ L{)~'B'C..\T t) ~ 1-n.-o$" j /' ". :. ,'. ..•... . -..... ," ================================================-~ j ~"-l¥->1b '5\,\?~OQ.\ 12>1:>,,"' \\u. L...L :. ~'} 1) ~,,~ l\L C,\~~~~'z.5 ~()~ \..,.,~\~(.\ ZONING PIB/FW TECHNICAL BBllVlCBS 1lI0+10l CDR - - - -Renton dity Llmitoo TO= .. ·.· .. i_~IRi=-8~~--.... ~~ •.. -·:-····rSt~J::~-·· ,., . ;("' ; ,,-,. 31 T24N R5E E 1/2 ~31 Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor May 11, 2005 State Department of Ecology Northwest Regional Office 3190 160th Ave. SE Bellevue, WA 98008-5452 CITY )F RENTON PlanninglBuildlnglPublic Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator SUBJECT: Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit and Shoreline Conditional Use Permit for the Corbett Boat Lift; File No. LUA .. 05-013;SM, SMC-HJ ECF To Whom It May Concern: Enclosed is the Shoreline Substantial Development Permit and Conditional Use Permit for the above referenced project. On April 26, 2005, the City of Renton Hearing Examiner approved both the Shoreline Substantial Development Permit and Conditional Use Permit. We are filing this action with the Department of Ecology and the Attorney General per WAC 173-14-090. Please review this permit and attachments and call me at (425) 430-7382 if you have any questions or need additional information. k Susan A. Fiala, AICP Senior Planner Attachments: A. B. C. D. E. F. G. H. I. Legal Description Shoreline Permit Site Plan -OHWM highlighted Master Application Environmental Publication ERC Determination Environmental Checklist Project Description Hearing Examiner's Decision cc: Office of Attorney General City of Renton, Utility Systems ApplicanUOwner/Contact ~S~~~l.w~c----------------------------~RENTON 1055 South Grady Way -Renton, Washington 98055 * This paper contains 50% recycled material, 30% post consumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE CITY OF RENTON SHORELINE MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1971 PERMIT FOR SHORELINE MANAGEMENT SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION NO.: LUA-05-013, SM, SMC-H, ECF DATE RECEIVED: February 17, 2005 DATE OF PUBLIC NOTICE: February 17, 2005 DATE APPROVED: April 26, 2005 TYPE OF ACTION(S): [ X ] Substantial Development Permit [X] Conditional Use Permit [] Variance Permit Pursuant to Chapter 90.58 RCW, the City of Renton has granted a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit. This action was taken on the following application: OWNER/APPLICANT: Rick Corbett, 2811 Mountain View Ave. N., Renton, WA 98056 CONTACT: PROJECT: DEVELOPMENT DESCRIPTION: Jeffrey Sidebotham, Seaborn Pile Driving Co., 9311 SE 36th St., Mercer Island, WA 98040 Corbett Boat Lift The applicant has requested a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit and a Shoreline SUbstantial Development Permit for the construction of a residential boatlift. The property contains a single family residence with a 432 square-foot pier and an existing boatlift station. The proposed project would remove the existing 9' by 15' boat lift and 3 mooring piles and install a new 12' by 18' boat lift along the north side of the pier. The boatlift and three pilings to be removed are located on the neighboring property and this proposal would relocate the boatlift to within the lot boundaries and bring it into compliance with setback regulations. The boatlift is a freestanding structure that would sit directly on the lakebed. It would not be attached to the existing pier. Two existing mooring piles are located to the north of the pier and would remain. No changes are proposed to the existing pier. The site is located within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of Lake Washington and is regulated by the City's Shoreline Master Program. The projected project cost will be approximately $10,000. The project would be completed within the timing conditions set by the Department of Fish and Wildlife and Corps of Engineers, July 16 -December 31. A best management plan would be implemented to minimize any impacts. The removal of materials and the delivery of the new boat lift would be completed by a barge mounted crane on Lake Washington. An Environmental (SEPA) Review Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) was issued for this project on March 21, 2005. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See Attachment "A" SEC-TWNP-R: WITHIN SHORELINES OF: APPLICABLE MASTER PROGRAM: SMPermiL Corbett. doc 31-24-5E Lake Washington City of Renton City of Renton PIBIPW Department Corbett Boatlift oreline Substantial Development Permit Page 20f2 The following section/page of the Master Program is applicable to the development: Section Description Page 4-3-090.J Urban Environment page 3-25 4-3-090.K. General Use Regulations for All Shoreline Uses Page 3-26 4-3-090.L Specific Use Regulations page 3-27 4-3-090.M. Variances and Conditional Uses page 3-39 4-9-190.1.1, 2, 3, 5 Variances and Conditional Uses Page 9-54 Staff recommends that development of this project shall be undertaken pursuant to the following terms and condition: 1. The applicant shall comply with all construction conditions by the State agencies and all construction conditions provided in the application and modifications submitted to the City. That the permit be granted pursuant to the Shoreline Management Action of 1971 and pursuant to the following: 1. The issuance of a license under the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 shall not release the applicant from compliance with federal, state, and other permit requirements. 2. This permit may be rescinded pursuant to Section 14(7) of the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 in the event the permittee fails to comply with any condition herein. 3. A construction permit shall not be issued until twenty-one (21) days after approval by the Washington State Department of Ecology or until any review proceedings initiated within this twenty-one (21) day review period have been completed. Fred J. Kaufm n Hearing Examl r cc: Attorney General's Office Applicant Project File SMPermiC Corbett. doc Assessor legal Description Records: Account Number 334210402908 f~ecord Number ,01 -05 79-80-81 AHILLMANS LK WN GARDEN OF EDEN # 1POR \i . .s' OF LOTS & 2ND CL SH LOS ADJBEG NXN MQR LN WITH S LN LOT 81 TH N 51 DEG 21 MIN 04 SEC E 3~ FTM/L TO WLY MGN N P R/W TH NWLYALG SO MGN 69 FT TH S 65 / DEG50 MIN 45 SEC W 20 FT TH S 50 DEG 55 MIN 04 SEC Legal Description W 36.07 FT TO PT ONMDR LN TH S 50 DEG 55 MIN 04 SECW 47 FT TH S 63 DEG 38 MIN 40 SECW 222.51 FT TO INNER-HARBOR LN TH S 40 DEG 35 MIN 00 SEC E 65.07 FTTH N 62 DEG 15 MIN 42 SEC E224.02 FT TH S 46 DEG 34 MINOO SEC E 10.82 FT TH N 50 DEG 36 MIN 04 SEC E 50.70 FT TO POB VICINITY MAP INO SCALE LEGAL DESCRIPTLON KENMORE JUANITA SEUEVUE RENTON VICINITY MAP NO SCALE PURPOSE: SA~c mO~'R.-Aq~ ~OR. \>~\~1\-~ ~""~c~ ~\~ DATUM: C.O.E. 0,0' E::)I. 1919 ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: SEE SHEET # JOB NAME: ~\G2. c...o~~':''' MAIL ADD: ~8\\ N\\)\I.il~\)l\i\~ ~ . RC~\Q~/~f:\~ "<\~o£5 SITE ADO: :)~'rt\c.. : ~:c.Mb\l~ 3 ~\\€.~ JlI~'O ~ ~~ ~ L"S;, -l.~ "> l' ~\\ '(\ ~~~ l::>O'A\ L\\.\,- IN: LAKE WASHINGTON AT:4~\)~ COUNlY OF: KING STATE: WASHINGTON APPL BY: R.\C.¥... c...()\~.$~\\' PAGE: OF DATE: Il_-~- / r.lfVF.lOPMENT PLANNING !,:ITV OF RENTON JAN 31 2005 , RECEIVED / 1 \ ~ \ ;:- 1. £) " .... 't i, .-I 1 " ~. 'D~~ 10'" -\JJ o~ . 05 013 o \ \ \ c::::=::...r-@-r==1 \ r:... V tlV';t-\ ?J {y~tJ A#d~ ~~> IYJ ~ 05 013 City of Renton vt:I/EI.OP, C7~ ~Effr PI Aa'., OF 1iEN'r'ONYlV/NG LAND USE PERMIT JAN'~1 ~ Fl' 4U1O MASTER APPLICATION ECEIVEO PROPERTY OWNER(S} NAME: APPLICANT (if other than owner) NAME: COMPANY [If applicable): ADDRESS: CITY: ZIP: TELEPHONE NUMBER CONTACT PERSON COMPANY (if applicable): ::>t,'f\Bc~~ \i: ~~ l ~_ TELEPHONE NUMBER AND E-MAIL ADDRESS: ~ob~ ~ '36 -J 1 00 ~ Q:\WEB\PW\DEVSERV\Forrns\P\anning\masterapp,doc08I29/03 PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: C()~~i\\ l:>o~ l\.~· PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)Il.OCATION AND ZIP CODE: ..18\\ VY$)a~\P$)J \.he.~ Auf N- I~::; .. ~\fl~ f \I'J ~ -'lSO)b KING COUNTY. ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): .331 ~J D -L./01G} EXISTING LAND USE(S):'Sl\JG.L"'t.. S;A-Yy\.~'1 , PROPOSED LAND USE(S): S\~6ltZ...'S\~w\'\l,,\ -. EXISTING COMPREHENSNE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: PROPOSED COMPREHENSNE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION ("If applicable): EXISTING ZONING: ~-8 PROPOSED ZONING ("If applicable): " ,-;II- SITE AREA flO square feet): ~~OO It.'#< SQUARE FOOTAGE OF ROADWAYS TO BE DEDICATED FOR SUBDNlSIONS OR PRIVATE STREETS SERVING THREE LOTS OR MORE (if applicable): ~/Pr PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET ACRE (if applicable): ~ (i\-- NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable): N I 'F~' NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): V Jp., . A/IPv~M~D . -: I • ,OJECT INFORMAT,I_O_N-->-(_lcO_"_t_.II_u_ed--<,ll _______ -.. -NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (If applicable): O.~~ SQUARE FOOTAGE: OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAl BUILDINGS (If applicable): ~'t~ , " SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO R!~MAJN.rlf;a~): . . \'.. , . .).810 . ~ .. . SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): ~ iPs SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAl BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (If applicable): 4-:>).. ~ ~ •. \\~ NET FLOOR AREA OF NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (If applicable): ~~).. SQ...~\ ~~. NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPlOYED BY THE NEW PROJECT (If appflCable): ~/l\· PROJECT VALUE: IS THE SITE lOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTAlLY CRITICAl AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE ", SQUARE FOOTAGE (If appJlcable): ,,' a AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA ONE a AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA 'TWO a FLOOD HAZARD AREA sq. ft. a GEOlOGIC HAZARD sq. ft. a HABITAT CONSERVATION sq. ft. )( SHORELINE STREAMS AND lAKES sq. ft. a WETlANDS sq. ft. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (Attach legal description on separate sheet with the following Infonnatlon Included) SITUATE IN THE S£ QUARTER OF SECTION 3 ( , TOWNSHIP~ RANGE S" , IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES list all land use applications being applied for: 1. H6K CondiJje>Ni Use, :fJ4 ()DO 3. b'lVlI',-fL?V~SZO~ 2. 5/;()Jdine 5t~~ ~h-~At~ 4. <" - Staff will calculate applicable fees and postage: $ AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP A " (PM! -) Jf5t!11!!-&~~ ' ............ am -"""" .... ).J£:, ....... _01 ... _ involved in this or the authorized representative to act for a corporation (please aIIach proof authorization) and that the foregoing ~statements ~in and the infofmation herewih are in aI respects true and correct to the ~ofrrry JcnowIedge and be&ef., • I certify that I koow or have satisfactory evidence that tJ..ieha". if e n h Iv If '-, signed this instnInent and acknowledged it to be hislherJlheir free and dIntafy act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the Instnment. ,,,,III"U''''11 ~\\\\_U.ll.RrtA. "'I. ~~' .. ';:)l~:-.~v~, (Signature of OwnerIRepresentative) ill ~ ..... ~M" €-+=;.~ % & ~.' ...o'.~ .. ~-... oTA.09" '~Q: , , . r :%i ~*: .. :*i ; (n~ I1J' C /~ l Notary Public in and for the State of Washington \, ~~"'~A;... BU &~.:(..O j 'i:. ' .. ~(: 10. '2: .... ,c') ~ Jj,~ oj-·V:iA~~""~ o I /\ 1_ [J :::"I!ft/~\j~ (Signature of OwnerlRepresentative) G J '. '-...:.Jy\..., r ....... 7' V ... L Notary (Print>. ~ Ld J 4. My appointment expires: Q:\WEB\PW\DEVSERWorms\Planninglmasterapp.doc.08I29/03 , .,l1g Co.unty: Assessor Property Characteristics Report Page 2 of3 Assessor legal Description Records: Account Number 334210402908 Wecord Number 101 -05 79-80-81 AHILLMANS LK WN GARDEN OF EDEN # 1POR t Pf OFJ..OTS & 2NQ CL SH LDS ADJBEG NXN M~R LN WITH S LN LOT 81 TH N 51 DEG 21 MIN 04 SEC E 3 FTM/L TO t WLY MGN N P RIW TH NWL YALG SO MGN 69 FT TH S 65 DEG50 MIN 45 SEC W 20 FT TH S 50 DEG 55 MIN 04 SEC Legal Description W 36.07 FT TO PT ONMDR LN TH S 50 DEG 55 MIN 04 SECW 47 FTTH S 63 DEG 38 MIN 40 SECW 222.51 FT TO INNER-HARBOR LN'TH S 40 DEG 35 MIN 00 SEt E 65.07 FTTH N 62 DEG 15 MIN 42 SEC E224.02 FT TH S 46 DEG 34 MINOO SEC E 10.82 FT TH N 50 DEG 36 MIN 04 SEC E 50:70 FT TO POB Assessor Residential Building Records: Address 2811 MOUNTAIN VIEWAV N 98055 Building Grade Very Good Building number 1 .. , ....... ......... , ................................... -.... ...................... -.... -.-.......................... .................... . ................•........•.•. Cpndition Average. Bedrooms 5 .. Year Built 1987 Baths 2 Year Renovated 0 112 Baths 0 Total Living SqFt 2870· 3/4 Baths 0 1 st Floor SqFt 1710 Stories 1 .. Half Floor SqFt , 1160 Single Story Fireplace 1 2nd Floor SqFt 0 Multi Story Fireplace 1 Upper Floor SqFt 0 Free Standing 1 Fireplace Total Basement SqFt 0 Basement Garage SqFt 0 .. . . . '. "-. . . .. Total Finished Basement· 0 Aijached Garage SqFt 580. SqFt Finished Basement Grade NONE OR Open Porch SqFt 160 . UNKNOWN ... .'. . . ..... .... .. ...... ... OayHght Basement N ... r Enclosed Porch SqFt 0 Heat System Forced. Air" Deck SqFt 680 Heat Source . Gas Percent Brick Stone 0 ., This report Was generated: 121291200412:44:07 PM .;:;.- Related on-line reports: .... :·DDES·:··Perm·ii"Appli~ati~nsi~·e·p~it ...... · .. · .. ····· ....................................................... ,., ........ : ................... ~ . r@~~:§~~~~~::~i~~~~~:~~~:§~:~~~~~~~:~!:~~~~~!i~~~::~~B~~.:::::::::::::::::.::::::::::::;:,:;::::::::l " : King County Assessor: eReal Property Report (PDF format requires Acrobat) \ ;:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::;;:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::;:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::;::::::::::::::::a~ ~ King County Treasury Operations: Property Tax Information ~ i ):R:~~~~d~~::offi~~:;::E~~:i~~:T~:~::A:ffi:d:~:~it~::R~p~:rt::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::,,:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::j :·~·~~.~~~~~:§ffi~~~.::~~~~~~d··i~~:~~~:~f:~.i~~~.·:~·~:~·~X~.:··~:~~··~~~~·~~:R··~?·~~~·~~!~:.:::::l http://www5 . m etrokc. goY/reports/property Jeport.asp?PIN=3 342104029 12/29/2004 STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING } AFFIDA VIT OF PUBLICATION PUBLIC NOTICE Jody Barton, being first duly sworn on oath that she is a Legal Advertising Representati ve of the King County Journal a daily newspaper, which newspaper is a legal newspaper of general circulation and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continuously as a daily newspaper in King County, Washington. The King County Journal has been approved as a Legal Newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. The notice in the exact form annexed was published in regular issues of the King County Journal (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice. a Public Notice was published on April 8,2005. The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of$6~ .. \\\\1:1111//1//1 ;~ ... ::\ ~:: !~,~;/~~ , ',on f:>/) •••• "',> ~ 'r' .,." ,-l·'. .. ·~ I\R' {J,J) \. ~ • U \'>' \J \ Y • _ \"' .-- -,--@II-: 2' -gal Advertising Representative, King County Journal ubscribed and sworn to me this 11th day of April, 2005. () . PUD\..\\J j c5~ "'~:". ~...,\ \. u Q,'\ .//' § ~;' -1 ,. ". 1'4 \" 2 ~ () •• ' _ ..... ..:; ..;:->. / (":-:: ..... ;; .... Y'>'-:0- 'I, Up V"; p,S ,\\" ctJL.-1/1., \\\ 'I/il/ililll\\\\\\ Tom A. Meagher Notary Public for the State of Washington, Residing in Redmond, Washington P.O. Number: Cost of publishing this notice includes an affidavit surcharge. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, Washington, on April 19, 2005 at 9:00 AM to consider the following petitions: Corbett Boat Lift LUA05-013, SM, SMC-H, ECF Location: 2811 Mountain View Avenue N, The applicant is requesting a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the construction of a residential boatlift. The property contains a single family residence with a pier and an existing boatlift station. The proposed project would remove the existing boat lift and piles and install a new boat lift. No changes are proposed to the existing pier. All interested persons are invited to be present at the Public Hearing to express their opinions. Questions should be directed to the Hearing Examiner at 425-430-6515. Published in the King County Journal April 8, 2005. #858773 CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE APPLICATION NUMBER: LUA05-013, SM, SMC-H, ECF APPLICANT: Rick Corbett PROJECT NAME: Corbett Boat Lift DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review, a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the construction of a residential boatlift. The property contains a single family residence with a 432 square-foot pier and an existing boatlift station. The proposed project would remove the existing 9' by 15' boat lift and 3 mooring piles and install a new 12' by 18' boC!t lift along the north side of the pier. The boat lift and three pilings to be removed are located on the . neighboring property and this proposal would relocate the boatlitt to within the lot boundaries and bring it into compliance with setback regulations. The boatlift is a freestanding structure that would sit directly on the lakebed. It would not be attached to the existing pier. Two existing mooring piles are located to the north of the pier and would remain. No changes are proposed to the existing pier. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: LEAD AGENCY: 2811 Mountain View Avenue N City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section This Determination of Non-Significance is issued under WAC 197-11-340. Because other agencies of jurisdiction may be involved, the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fourteen (14) days. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on April 4, 2005. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 O.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: March 21, 2005 DATE OF DECISION: March 15,2005 SIGNATURES: DATE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of Checklist: 05 013 DEVELoPMENT PJANN CITY OF RENTON ING DEVELOP~SERVlCES 1055 SOUTH GRADY WAY RENTON, WA 98055 (425) 430-7200 JAN 3 f 2005 REC£IVED Date Received:-::--. _____ _ File No., ________ _ F~, _______ ~------ The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the City identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the City decide whether an EIS is required. ,Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. The City uses this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own opservations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later.:, Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the City staff can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help descn'be your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reaSonably related to determining ifthete may be significant adverse impact. . '. Use of checklist for non-project proposals: (Applicants for private development Projects should disregard this section.) Complete this checklist for non-project proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply". IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMEJNTAL SHEET FOR NON-PROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For non-project actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project, "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area, respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: 2. Name of applicant: Agent: Seaborn Pile Driving Company 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 9311 SE 3(/1' Street STE 204. Mercer Island, WA 98040 Jeff Sidebotham. 4. Date checklist prepared: 12129/04 5. Agency requesting checklist: CITY OF RENTON -DEVELOPMENT SERVICES j t t, 6. Proposed Timing or Schedule (including phasing, if applicable): , Sometime after receiving appropriate permits, and within designated time remictions, if any. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. None known 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal: This Checklist 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by yoUr proposal? If yes, explain. Yes, Washington State Department of FISheries and U.S. Corps of Engineers. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known: FISheries and Corps Approval - 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal,mcluding the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are Several questions later in this checklist that ask you to descn'be certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those ansWerS on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this fonn to include additional specific , infonnation on project description.) Remove and dispose of three existing mooring piling and a free standing boat lift. Install a new free standing boatlift station i~ a new location on the property. 12. ,Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a PARCEL NUMBER, STREET ADDRESS, IF ANY, AND SECTION, TOWNSHIP, AND RANGE. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). PROVIDE A LEGAL DESCRlPTlON, SITE PLAN, VICINITY MAP, AND TOPOGRAPIDC MAP. While you should submit any plans required by the' agency,you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. 2811 Mountain View Avenue, Renton WA 98055 Tax Account 1# 334210-4029 SE % SEC 31 TUN R 5E B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other. ___ _ Flat b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 2% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils specify them and note any prime farmland Gravel, sand, clay d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. None known t !, e. Describe the purpose, type and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. None proposed f Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. No g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? None known h. PROPOSED MEASURES TO REDUCE OR CONTROL EROSION, OR OTHER IMPACTS TO THE EARTH, , IF ANY: By complying with regulations 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. . Standard equipment emissions for 2 days b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No C. PROPOSED MEASURES TO REDUCE OR CONTROL EMISSIONS OR OTHER IMPACTS TO AIR, IF ANY: .Finish.job in timely manner to avoid excessive emissions -.. ---- 3. WATER a; SUrface 1. Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? Jfyes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. , Lake Washington 2. Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Yes, overwoter construction (see plans) 3. Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None 4. Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general descriptions, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. None known 5. Does the proposal lie within a loo-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No 6. Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No , b. Ground l. Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No 2. . Describe waste. material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals ... ; agriculturaI; etc). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of aniniaIs or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Not tipplicable c, Water Runoff (including storm water): ··1. Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include .quantities, ifknown). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Rain water runs off existing dock into lake 2. Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe: No .d. PROPOSED MEASURES TO REDUCE OR CONTROL SURFACE GROUND, AND RUNOFF WATER IMPACTS, IF ANY: , Usual care 4. PLANTS a Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: . deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other ~ evergreen tree fir, cedar, pine, other ~shrubs .. . :k graSS -.-:.pastUre __ crop or grain __ wet soilplants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk ~cabbage,other _x_water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other _ .. __ other types of vegetation \ b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? None c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None Known d. PROPOSED LANDSCAPING, USE OF NATIVE PLANTS. OR OTIIER MEASURES TO PRESERVE OR ENHANCE VEGETATIONONTIIE SITE, IF ANY: None proposed 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any bird and animal which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron. eagle, songbirds, other: Geese, Ducks , mammals, deer, bear, elk, beaver, other::--__ fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other~erch~_ b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Chnook Salmon / Bals Eagles c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Not known d. PROPOSED MEASURES TO PRESERVE OR ENHANCE WILDLIFE, IF ANY: Usual care 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES 3. . What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wOod stove, solar) will be uSed to meet the completed prq;ect's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Diesel fuel, to run equipment b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. WHAT KINDS OF ENERGY CONSERVATION FEATURES ARE INCLUDED IN THE PLANS OF THIS PROPOSAL? LIST OTHER PROPOSED MEASURES TO REDUCE OR CONTROL ENERGY IMPACTS, IF ANY: None proposed 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALlH a. Are there any envirohmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe: No I. Describe special emergency services that might be required: None 2. PROPOSED MEASURES TO REDUCE OR CONTROL ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH HAZARDS, IF ANY: Usual care b. Noise 1. What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None known 2. What types and·level of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would corne from the site .. Construction, usual work hours (7:30 to 3:30, M-F) 3. PROPOSED MEASURES TO REDUCE OR CONTROL NOISE IMPACfS, IF ANY: Usual care 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE I a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Residential recreation b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, descn"be. No c. Describe any structures on the site. Residence of owner and private pier d.. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? An existing boat lift and three mooring piles will be removed e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? R15 f. '. What is the currentcomptehensive plan deSignation of the site? g. If applicable, what is the current Shoreline Master Program designation of the site? Not applicable h. . Has any part of the site been classified as an "envirOnnienfally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Yes / Lake Washington i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Owner andfamily j Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None 'k. PROPOSED MEASURES TO AVOID OR REDUCE DISPLACEMENT IMPACTS, IF ANY: Usual care L PROPOSED MEASURES TO ENSURE THE PROPOSAL IS COMPATIBLE WITH EXISTING AND PROJECTED LAND USES AND PLANS, IF ANY: By cOmplying with regulations .9. HOUSING a. . Approximately how many units would be provided, if any. Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Not applicable b. Approxiniately how many unitS, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing." Not applicable c. PROPOSED MEASURES TO REDUCE OR CONTROL HOUSING IMPACTS, IF ANY: Not applicable 10. AESTHETICS J a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas~ what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? OHW+2' b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c.PROPOSED MEASURES TO REDUCE OR CONTROL AESTHETIC IMPACTS, IF ANY: Usual care 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the Proposal produce? What time of da~ould it mainly occur? None b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None known d PROPOSED MEASURES TO REDUCE OR CONTROL LIGHT AND GLARE IMPACTS, IF ANY: Usual care 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Wide; i'elilted activities : b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. None known c. PROPOSED MEASURES TO REDUCE OR CONTROL IMPACTS ON RECREATION, INCLUDING RECREATION OPPORTUNITIES TO BE PROVIDED BY THE PROIECT OR APPLICANT, IF ANY: Usual care . 13. mSTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects Listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. None known b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None known c. ANY MEASURES TO REDUCE OR CONTROL IMPACTS, IF ANY: Usual care 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highway.s serving the site, and describe proposed access for the existing street . system. Show on site plans, ifany. ( Mountain View Avenue and private driveway"') b. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? YesJI4mile c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? None d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or Improvements to existing roads or streets, not including c1riveway? If so, generally describe (indicate whether Public or private). No e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. Yes, close to local roads and over Lake Washington. > f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Not applicable g' PROPOSED MEASURES TO REDUCE OR CONTROL TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS, IF ANY: Usual care 15. PUBLIC SERVICES ·a. Would the project result in an increased need for public Services'(for example: fire protection, police'protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. . No : .. ~ b. PROPOSED MEASURES TO REDUCE OR CONTROL DIRECT IMPACTS 'ON PUBLIC SERVICES, IF ANY: Usual care ,16 .. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. NoneKnown . C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Si~=:~ Date SubJl1.itt : City Of Renton Environmental Checklist Seaborn Pile Driving Co. Seattle Wa Fonn No. 4A6197 City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 ' i Re: Project Narrative Location: 2811 Mountain View Drive Renton, WA 98055 Owner: Mr. Rick Corbett Se ~ sec 31 T 24 R 5E Tax ID: 334210-4029 January 11, 2005 Square footage (lot) 4300 sq. ft. Pier: 432 Front Footage: 70' House: 2870 Land Use Permits 1. Shoreline Substantial Development 2. SEPA Review 3. Building Permit Zoning R-8 05 013 The site is a single family residence (2870 sq. ft) with a 432 square foot pier located on the shoreline of Lake Washington. The site is a medium bank shoreline with good drainage conditions. The proposed work is to remove an existing boat lift station and three mooring piling from their current location along the south side of the pier and install a new free standing boat lift station along the north side of the existing pier. The proposed lift will be placed within the setback requirements set by The City of Renton. This is a solar powered unit requiring no electrical or water lines. The boat lift sits directly on the lake bed and is supported utilizing two foot by two foot pads place in four locations. There will be no pile driving or excavation of soils. Please refer the enclosed details. The projected project cost will be approximately $ 10,000.00 The project will be completed within the timing conditions set by The Department of Fish & Wildlife and Corps of Engineers, July 16 -December 31. The hours will be between 7am and 4pm Monday through Friday. A best management plan will be implemented to minimize any impacts to the surrounding areas. Removal of materials and delivery of the new boat lift will be completed by a barge mounted crane on Lake Washington. Please call us at 206-236-1700 if you need any additional information. Sincerely, , SEABORN, PILE DRIV,I~~ COM~Y ~ f5h~ ~~Sidebotham April 26, 2005 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION APPLICANT: LOCATION: SUMMARY OF REQUEST: SUMMARY OF ACTION: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REPORT: PUBLIC HEARING: Rick Corbett 2811 Mountain View Ave N Renton, W A 98056 LUA-05-013, ECF, SM, SMC-H 2811 Mountain View Avenue North Shoreline Conditional Use Permit and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the construction of a residential boat lift. Development Services Recommendation: Appro'le The Development Services Report was received by the Examiner on April 12, 2005. After reviewing the Development Services Report, examining available information on file with the application, field checking the property and surrounding area; the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES Thefollowing minutes are a summary of the April 19, 2005 hearing. The legal record is recorded on CD. The hearing opened on Tuesday, Apri I 19, 2005, at 9:02 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of the Renton City Hall. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No.1: Yellow file containing the original Exhibit No.2: Site Plan application, proof of posting, proof of publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No.3: Boat Lift Detail (Side and End) Exhibit No.4: Boat Lift Detail (Down/Up) Exhibit No.5: Zoning Map The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by Susan Fiala, Senior Planner, Development Services, City of Renton, 1055 S Grady Way, Renton, Washington 98055. This project is located off of the shoreline of Lake Washington at 2811 Mountain View Avenue North. The Jot is in approximate alignment with North 29th Place and North 29th Street in the Kennydale neighborhood. The site is zoned Residential -8, there is a single-family house on the property as well as an existing pier and dock. Corbett Boat lift File No.: LUA-05-013, SM, SMC-H, ECF April 26, 2005 Page 2 The request is for the relocation of the existing boat lift to be within the subject property site. The existing boat lift that is to be removed is located outside of the property line to the south. There are three pilings that will be removed as part of this project. The site is located within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of Lake Washington and is regulated by the City's Shoreline Master Program. This portion of the shoreline is considered an urban environment and does allow residential uses. A boat lift is not specifically stated in the Shoreline Management Act as a permitted use, therefore, the applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit. The boat lift is proposed to be 12' by 18' and would be a freestanding structure that would sit directly on the lakebed. The project construction would be completed within the timing conditions set by the Department of Fish and Wildlife and the Corps of Engineers, which is between July 16 and December 31. The Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS). There were no conditions or mitigation measures. No appeals were filed. This project appears to be consistent with Shoreline Use Criteria as it relates to compatibility, public use, and general purpose. The use is not expected to cause significant adverse effect to the shoreline environment and it is not anticipated any detrimental effects will be created of any significance than what currently exist along the shoreline of Lake Washington in this area. The Shoreline Substantial Development Permit would be signed off by the Hearing Examiner at the time the Conditional Use decision is issued and then be forwarded on to the Department of Ecology. Following the 21- day appeal period, the applicant will then be able to move forward with the construction. Staff recommends approval of the Shoreline Conditional Use and Shoreline Substantial Development Permits. Rick Corbett, 2811 Mountain View Ave. N., Renton, WA 98056 stated that he purchased the property last November. The boat lift that is in existence is a very unsound homemade structure, he therefore is going with a professionally installed boat lift on his property. The neighbor to the south has no problem with the dock as it currently sits and, in fact, he is doing him a favor by removing the pilings at the time of the boat lift r(~moval. Jeff Sidebotham, Seaborn Pile Driving, 9311 SE 36th Street #204, Mercer Island, W A 98040 stated he had received a permit from the Department ofFish and Wildlife, HPA approval regarding the installation of this boat lift. The Corps of Engineers permit is pending and being reviewed currently, he expects to receive it very ~~~ . Kayren Kittrick, Development Services Division stated that there is a sewer line that runs along the shoreline. There should be marks on the docks to figure out where the line runs. Before the pilings are removed, it is necessary to call the Maintenance Department and they will have a crew on stand-by just in case something gets broken. The line appears to be in the water, but above the bottom of the lake. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 9:26 a.m. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATION Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: Corbett Boat lift File No.: LUA-05-013, SM, SMC-H, ECF April 26, 2005 Page 3 1. The applicant, Rick Corbett, filed a request for a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit as well as a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit. 2. The yellow file containing the staff report, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. 3. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the City's responsible official issued a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS). 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5. There was no opposition from the public regarding the subject proposal. 6. The subject site is located at 2811 Mountain View Avenue North. The subject site is located west of Lake Washington Boulevard on the shoreline of Lake Washington. The subject site isjust south ofN 29th Street if it were extended westward toward the lake. 7. The map element ofthe Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of single-family uses, but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the Plan. 8. The subject site is currently zoned R-8 (Single Family - 8 dwelling units/acre). 9. The subject site was annexed to the City with the adoption of Ordinance 1804 enacted in December 1959. 10. The subject site is approximately 4,300 square feet but a large portion of the property extends out into the lake. 11. The subject site is essentially flat and the lot includes the shoreline and lake surface. 12. A single family home is located on the eastern, uplands portion of the site. The site also contains a dock and boat lift located on the water portion of the subject site. The dock is 6 feet wide and 52 feet long. The lift is south of the dock, out near its end and is 9 feet wide and 15 feet long. 13. The existing boat lift is located south of the dock and actually straddles the property line dividing the subject site from its neighboring lot to the south. The end of the dock also crosses the property line. A south setback of 5 feet is required from the property line and the current lift intrudes into the setback. 14. The applicant proposes removing the existing boat lift and replacing it with a new boat lift on the north side of the dock. The boat lift would then be fully contained on the applicant's property. 15. The new lift would be 12 feet wide and 18 feet long and would be approximately 25 feet offshore of the Ordinary High Water Mark. It would be located approximately 15 feet from the south property line and approximately 25 feet from the north property line. 16. While the dock also intrudes into the setback line there would be no change to the dock. The neighbor has not objected to the dock's location. Corbett Boat lift File No.: LUA-05-013, SM, SMC-H, ECF April 26, 2005 Page 4 17. The work will be done in the time window specified by the state to avoid interfering with salmon activity in the lake. 18. Lake Washington's shoreline is classified as a Shoreline of Statewide Significance and therefore any development adjacent to it is subject to the City's Shoreline Master Program. This section of the shoreline is designated as an Urban Shoreline. 19. Staff noted that the residential designation of the subject site permits docks associated with single- family uses along this portion of the shoreline. Boat lifts are not a listed use nor are they a prohibited use and, therefore, are subject to a shoreline conditional use review. 20. Staff recommends that since a sewer line that runs along the shoreline, before the pilings are removed, it will be necessary to call the City of Renton's Sewer Maintenance Department and they will have a crew on stand-by just in case something gets broken. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The criteria for approving a Shoreline Conditional Use permit are twofold. There are City criteria and those City criteria require compliance with additional State criteria. Those criteria are as follows: Renton: Section 4-9-190.1.5: 5. Conditional Use: a. Purpose: Upon proper application, a conditional use permit may be granted. The objective of a conditional use provision is to provide more control and flexibility for implementing the regulations of the Master Program. With provisions to control undesirable effects, the scope of uses can be expanded to include many uses. b. Decision Criteria: Uses classified as conditional uses can be permitted only after consideration and by meeting sllch performance standards that make the use compatible with other permitted uses within that area. A conditional use permit will be granted subject to each of the following conditions: i. The use must be compatible with other permitted uses within that area. ii. The use will not interfere with the public use of public shorelines. iii. Design of the site will be compatible with the surroundings and the City's Master Program. iv. The use shall be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the City's Master Program. v. The use meets the conditional use criteria in WAC 173-27-160. Washington State: WAC 173-27-160: Review criteria for conditional lise permits. The purpose of a conditional use permit is to provide a system within the master program which allows flexibility in the application of use Corbett Boat lift File No.: LUA-05-0 13, SM, SMC-H, ECF April 26, 2005 Page 5 regulations in a manner consistent with the policies of RCW 90.58.020. In authorizing a conditional use, special conditions may be attached to the permit by local government or the department to prevent undesirable effects of the proposed use and/or to assure consistency of the project with the act and the local master program. (I) Uses which are classified or set forth in the applicable master program as conditional uses may be authorized provided that the applicant demonstrates all of the following: (a) That the proposed use is consistent with the policies of RCW 90.58.020 and the master program; (b) That the proposed use will not interfere with the normal public use of public shorelines; (c) That the proposed use of the site and design of the project is compatible with other authorized uses within the area and with uses planned for the area under the comprehensive plan and shoreline master program; (d) That the proposed use will cause no significant adverse effects to the shoreline environment in which it is to be located; and (e) That the public interest suffers no substantial detrimental effect. (2) In the granting of all conditional use permits, consideration shall be given to the cumulative impact of additional requests for like actions in the area. For example, if conditionnl use permits were granted for other developments in the area where similar circumstances exist, the total of the conditional uses shall also remain consistent with the policies of RCW 90.58.020 and shall not produce substantial adverse effects to the shoreline environment. (3) Other uses which are not classified or set forth in the applicable master program may be authorized as conditional uses provided the applicant can demonstrate consistency with the requirements of this section and the requirements for conditional uses contained in the master program. (4) Uses which are specifically prohibited by the master program may not be authorized pursuant to either subsection (1) or (2) of this section. 2. The area in which the subject site is located is zoned for and developed with single-family uses. Many of the properties have docks, piers and some properties have lifts. The boat lift proposed by the applicant appears to be compatible with the uses located in this area. 3. The proposed boat lift should not interfere with any public use of the shoreline. The applicant already has a boat lift and dock and this proposal will merely relocate the boat lift to abide by required setbacks from property lines. It will not create any additional obstacles toward navigation. This shoreline is privately owned and developed with a single-family home. 4. The lift will be set back from property lines more than required by code and will not create: any untoward impacts on adjacent uses or on water-oriented uses. Corbett Boat lift File No.: LUA-05-013, SM, SMC-H, ECF April 26, 2005 Page 6 5. The next series of criteria are contained within the Washington Administrative Code. One of the paramount goals is to protect the ecology of the shoreline. In this case, there should be no change other than some disturbance of the lake bottom but this will occur at a time that limits interference with salmon. 6. The lot, as noted, is private and it extends out into the lake. The proposed lift serves the lot. Private uses are permitted in this area of the shoreline. The use is similar to those uses permitted in an urban shoreline. The use should not impair the public use of this section of the lakeshore or the water in its vicinity. 7. The low-scale boat lift will not interfere with any uses that might occur in this area of the lake. The comprehensive plan designates this area as suitable for single-family uses and the normal complement of accessory uses. On a lakeshore property, piers, docks and similar uses including a boat lift are considered reasonable accessory uses. 8. The proposed boat lift should not create any significant adverse affects on the shoreline environment. 9. The relocation of the boat lift should not further harm the public interest. 10. As noted in earlier decisions, the analysis of cumulative impact or impacts is hard to judge. An existing boat lift will be removed and docks already protrude out into the lake from many of the homes. Clearly, there have had to be impacts to water quality and habitat as a result of motor boating and docks shading the lake and some of the shallow areas. This additional action will probably not have much affect on the overall circumstances. 11. Since boat lifts are neither permitted nor prohibited outright, they do require review under the Conditional Use criteria. The proposal use and restoration are generally consistent with the criteria noted above. RECOMMENDATION: The Conditional Use Permit and the Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the single boat lift should be approved ORDERED THIS 26th day of April 2005. TRANSMITTED THIS 26th day of April 2005 to the parties of record: Nancy Weil 1055 S Grady Way Renton, W A 98055 Rick Corbett 2811 Mountain View Ave. N Renton, W A 98056 Jeff Sidebotham Seaborn Pile Driving 93 I I SE 36th Street #204 Mercer Island, W A 98040 Corbett Boat lift File No.: LUA-05-013, SM, SMC-H, ECF April 26, 2005 Page 7 Kayren Kittrick 1055 S Grady Way Renton, W A 98055 TRANSMITTED THIS 26th day of April 2005 to the following: Mayor Kathy Keolker-Wheeler Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer Julia Medzegian, Council Liaison Larry Warren, City Attorney Gregg Zimmerman, PBPW Administrator Alex Pietsch, Economic Development Jennifer Henning, Development Services Stacy Tucker, Development Services Stan Engler, Fire Larry Meckling, Building Official Planning Commission Transportation Division Utilities Division Neil Watts, Development Services Janet Conklin, Development Services King County Journal Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 100Gofthe City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m., May 10,2005. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Chapter 8, Section] ] 0, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of$75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. An appeal must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m., May 10,2005. If the Examiner's Recommendation or Decision contains the requirement for Restrictive Covenants, the executed Covenants will be required prior to approval by City CouncH or final processing of the file. You may contact this office for information on formatting covenants. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides tnat no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members ofthe City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. STA TE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING } AFFIDA VIT OF PUBLICATION PUBLIC NOTICE Jody Barton, being first duly sworn on oath that she is a Legal Advertising Representative of the King County Journal a daily newspaper, which newspaper is a legal newspaper of general circulation and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continuously as a daily newspaper in King County, Washington. The King County Journal has been approved as a Legal Newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. The notice in the exact form annexed was published in regular issues of the King County Journal (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a Public Notice was published on April 15,2005. The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum 0.0 Barton Legal Advertising Representative, King County Journal Subscribed and sworn to me this 15th day of April, 2005, d (/I ~4-0~ . \ \\ \ \ \ \ II ii : i if /' , '\\ \ ~ r'. \ I! / , <~.,\ NI C J.~, G /'1 ~ ~'>/ .<~' .:;, ~:""''''E'''':(~? /~ :.'-"'~'t~(·; ~,~.,. -'r:IJ?~~.~.~. :,' "/ ~ij\ /\R I' ,r· \ -:::. \ --.&-~ j6~ :::. (,f) '. PUB\ . .\,: k ,:: ~ ./'"'. i)': (" .... :::: -::::', -y, ···.;114 Y 2. 'l.~/ ..::::-'" .::; '.,> /'(:' : ......... ~ '<' \ ,. III Vr F \'J ,. -...) , .. ,-'-If J r' '\\' Tom A. Meagher III/ii/ilill\\\\\'.\\\ Notary Public for the State of Washington, Residing in Redmond, Washington P.O. Number: Cost of publishing this notice includes an affida vit surcharge. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON,WASHINGTON A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, Washington, on April 26, 2005 at 9:00 AM to consider the following petitions: Zetterberg Short Plat LUA05-032, SHPL-H Location: 755 S 21st Street. Description: The applicant is requesting Hearing Examiner Short Plat approval for the subdivision of a 1.39 acre site into 9 lots and one storm drainage tract. The lots are intended for the eventual devel- opment of detached single-family homes on lots ranging in size from 4,500 to 6,211 sq. ft. The site is zoned (R-8) with a proposed density of 7.9 dulac. Access to site is via a new public road extending south from So. 21st St. All interested persons are invited to be present at the Public Hearing to express their opinions. Questions should be directed to the Hearing Examiner at 425-430-6515. Published in the King County Journal April 15,2005. #858848 1 STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Northwest Regional Office • 3190 160th Avenue Sf • Bellevue, Washington 98008-5452 • (425) 649-7000 June 9, 2005 Susan Fiala, Senior Planner City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, W A 98055 Rick Corbett 2811 Mountain View Avenue North Renton, VIA 98056 Dear Ms. Fiala and Mr. Corbett: RE: City of Renton Permit # LUA-05-013 Rick Corbett -Applicant DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON JUN 1 4 2005 RECEIVED Shoreline Substantial Development Permit/Conditional Use Permit #2005-NW-80026 Purpose of Letter: This letter is to notify you that the department has reviewed the City of Renton's decision on your application to remove an existing boatlift and install a new residential boatlift within shoreline jurisdiction of Lake Washington. The Department of Ecology must review any Shoreline conditional use permit issued by a local government before the project is started. The Washington Administrative Code (WAC) requires the department do such a review in order to determine whether that local conditional use permit should be approved, denied, or approved with additional conditions (WAC 127-17-200). Our decision: We agree with the City of Renton, that, if you comply with their conditions and the following additional condition, your project is consistent with their master program and the criteria in law for granting a conditional use permit (WAC 173-27-160). The permit, as conditioned, is hereby approved. Prior to removal of the pilings and existing boat lift, the applicant shall notify the City of Renton Maintenance Department. The Maintenance Department shall have a crew immediately available to service any sewer line breaks in the vicinity of the pilings and existing boat lift. This approval means that you have met the requirements of the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 (Ch. 90.58 of the Revised Code of Washington). Other federal, state, or local approvals may also be required. Susan Fiala, Senior Planner Rick Corbett June 9, 2005 Page 2 of2 What should I do next? You must wait at least twenty-one (21) days from the date of this letter before you start the work authorized by this permit. This waiting period is to allow anyone disagreeing with any aspect of your permit to appeal to the Shoreline Hearings Board. If anyone does appeal your permit, you must wait until the appeal is over before you start work. The Shorelines Hearings Board will notify you by letter if they receive an appeal. To be sure the Shoreline Hearings Board has not received an appeal, we advise you to call them at (360) 459-6327 before you begin work. If you have any questions about this letter, please contact Betty Renkor at 425-649-4260. Sincerely, ~UtA1A~~~ Jeannie Summerhays, Section Supervisor Shorelands and Environmental Assistance Program Enclosure JS:BR:rc cc: Jeffrey Sidebotham, Seaborn Pile Driving Co. -. THIS SECTION FOR DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY USE ONLY IN REGARD TO A CONDITIONAL USE OR VARIANCE PERMIT. City of Renton Shoreline Substantial Development/Conditional Use Permit # LUA-05-013 APPLICANT: ____ ~Ri==·c=k~C=o=rb~e~tt~ __ ___ DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY PERMIT # __ =20=0=5~-N-,--W'-!-..::-8=0=02=6~ __ _ DATE RECEIVED BY THE DEPARTMENT: May 13,2005 APPROVED: Yes THIS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT IS APPROVED BY THE DEPARTMENT PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 90.58RCW with the following additional condition: 1. Prior to removal of the pilings and existing boat lift, the applicant shall notify the City of Renton Maintenance Department. The Maintenance Department shall have a crew immediately available to serve any sewer line breaks in the vicinity of the pilings and existing boat lift. DATE: June 9, 2005 (Signature of authorized dep~l) STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTJ\1ENT OF ECOLOGY Northwest Regional Office • ]190 160th Avenue Sf • Bellevue, Washington 98008-5452. (425) 649-iOOO June 9, 2005 Rick Corbett 2811 Mountain View Avenue North Renton, W A 98056 Dear Mr. Corbett: RE: City of Renton Permit # LUA-05-013 Rick Corbett-Applicant Shoreline Substantial D~v~ll)pm("nt P~rmit # 2005 NW 80030 Purpose of this letter: OEVELOPME CITY OF'tJtr~~NtNG JUN 1 ~ 2005 RECEIVED This letter is to inform you that on May 13,2005, the Department of Ecology received notice that the City of Renton approved your application for a substantial development permit. The permit is to remove an existing boatlift and install a new residential boatlift within shoreline jurisdiction of Lake Washington (Chapter 90.58, Revised Code of Washington). What happens next? The law requires that you must wait at least twenty-one (21) days from the date that we received this decision from the City of Renton before you begin the specific activities authorized by this permit. Therefore, you could not lawfully begin those activities until June 3, 2005. This waiting period is to allow anyone disagreeing with any aspect of your permit to appeal to the state Shorelines Hearings Board. If anyone does appeal your permit, you must wait until the appeal is over before you start work. The Shorelines Hearings Board will notify you by letter if they receive an appeal. To be sure that the Shorelines Hearings Board has not received an appeal, we advise you to call them at (360) 459-6327 before you begin work. Other federal, state and local permits may be required in addition to this shoreline permit. Ecology is also reviewing a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit issued by the City of Renton for this project. If you have any questions about this letter, please contact me at 425-649-4260. Sincerely, ~/r&J~ Betty R~kor, Shore lands Specialist Shorelands and Environmental Assistance Program BR:rc cc: Susan Fiala, City of Renton Jeffrey Sidebotham, Seaborn Pile Driving Co. AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON) ) ss. County of King ) Nancy Thompson being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and states: That on the 26th day of April 2005, affiant deposited via the United States Mail a sealed envelope(s) containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. Signature: SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this :l~/l1day of AfCt' ( ,2005. Notary Public il or the State of Washington Residing at ----lI:::;a",~~~ ___ " therein. Corbett Boat Lift File No.: LUA 05-013, ECF, SM, SMC-H The Decision or Recommendation contains a complete list of the Parties of Record. Rick Corbett 2811 Mountain View Ave N Renton, WA 98056 tel: 425-793-5065 (owner / applicant) Updated: 03/01/05 PARTIES OF RECORD CORBETT BOAT LIFT LUA05-013, SM, SMC-H, ECF Jeffrey Sidebotham Seaborn Pile Driving Co. 9311 SE 36th Street Mercer Island, WA 98040 tel: 206-236-1700 (contact) Pegi Galster 2907 Mountain View Avenue N Renton, WA 98056 tel: 425-271-7907 (party of record) (Page 1 of 1) HEARING EXAMINER'S REPORT ,. April 26, 2005 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION APPLICANT: LOCATION: SUMMARY OF REQUEST: SUMMARY OF ACTION: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REPORT: PUBLIC HEARING: Rick Corbett 2811 Mountain View Ave N Renton, W A 98056 LUA-05-013, ECF, SM, SMC-H 2811 Mountain View Avenue North Shoreline Conditional Use Permit and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the construction of a residential boat lift. Development Services Recommendation: Appro'le The Development Services Report was received by the Examiner on April 12,2005. After reviewing the Development Services Report, examining available information on file with the application, field checking the property and surrounding area; the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES Thefollowing minutes are a summary of the April 19, 2005 hearing. The legal record is recorded on CD. The hearing opened on Tuesday, April 19,2005, at 9:02 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of the Renton City Hall. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: -. Exhibit No.1: Yellow file containing the original Exhibit No.2: Site Plan application, proof of posting, proof of publ ication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No.3: Boat Lift Detail (Side and End) Exhibit No.4: Boat Lift Detail (Down/Up) Exhibit No.5: Zoning Map The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by Susan Fiala, Senior Planner, Development Services, City of Renton, 1055 S Grady Way, Renton, Washington 98055. This project is located off of the shoreline of Lake Washington at 2811 Mountain View Avenue North. The lot is in approximate alignment with North 29th Place and North 29th Street in the Kennydale neighborhood. The site is zoned Residential -8, there is a single-family house on the property as well as an existing pier and dock. Corbett Boat lift File No.: LUA-05-0J3, SM, SMC-H, ECF April 26, 2005 Page 2 The request is for the relocation of the existing boat lift to be within the subject property site. The existing boat lift that is to be removed is located outside of the property line to the south. There are three pilings that will be removed as part of this project. The site is located within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of Lake Washington and is regulated by the City's Shoreline Master Program. This portion of the shoreline is considered an urban environment and does allow residential uses. A boat lift is not specifically stated in the Shoreline Management Act as a permitted use, therefore, the applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit. The boat lift is proposed to be 12' by 18' and would be a freestanding structure that would sit direc!ly on the lakebed. The project construction would be completed within the timing conditions set by the Department of Fish and Wildlife and the Corps of Engineers, which is between July 16 and December 31. The Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS). There were no conditions or mitigation measures. No appeals were filed. This project appears to be consistent with Shoreline Use Criteria as it relates to compatibility, public use, and general purpose. The use is not expected to cause significant adverse effect to the shoreline environment and it is not anticipated any detrimental effects will be created of any significance than what currently exist along the shoreline of Lake Washington in this area. The Shoreline Substantial Development Permit would be signed off by the Hearing Examiner at the time the Conditional Use decision is issued and then be forwarded on to the Department of Ecology. Following the 21- day appeal period, the applicant will then be able to move forward with the construction. Staff recommends approval of the Shoreline Conditional Use and Shoreline Substantial Development Permits. Rick Corbett, 2811 Mountain View Ave. N., Renton, WA 98056 stated that he purchased the property last November. The boat lift that is in existence is a very unsound homemade structure, he therefore is going with a professionally installed boat lift on his property. The neighbor to the south has no problem with the dock as it currently sits and, in fact, he is doing him a favor by removing the pilings at the time of the boat lift f(:moval. Jeff Sidebotham, Seaborn Pile Driving, 9311 SE 36th Street #204, Mercer Island, W A 98040 stated he had received a permit from the Department ofFish and Wildlife, HPA approval regarding the installation of this boat lift. The Corps of Engineers permit is pending and being reviewed currently, he expects to receive it very shortly. Kayren Kittrick, Development Services Division stated that there is a sewer line that runs along the shoreline. There should be marks on the docks to figure out where the line runs. Before the pilings are removed, it is necessary to call the Maintenance Department and they will have a crew on stand-by just in case something gets broken. The line appears to be in the water, but above the bottom ofthe lake. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 9:26 a.m. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATION Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: , Corbett Boat lift File No.: LUA-05-013, SM, SMC-H, ECF April 26, 2005 Page 3 I. The applicant, Rick Corbett, filed a request for a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit as well as a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit. 2. The yellow file containing the staff report, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit # I. 3. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the City's responsible official issued a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS). 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5. There was no opposition from the public regarding the subject proposal. 6. The subject site is located at 2811 Mountain View Avenue North. The subject site is located west of Lake Washington Boulevard on the shoreline of Lake Washington. The subject site is just south ofN 29th Street if it were extended westward toward the lake. 7. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of single-family uses, but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the Plan. 8. The subject site is currently zoned R-8 (Single Family - 8 dwelling units/acre). 9. The subject site was annexed to the City with the adoption of Ordinance 1804 enacted in December 1959. 10. The subject site is approximately 4,300 square feet but a large portion of the property extends out into the lake. II. The subject site is essentially flat and the lot includes the shoreline and lake surface. 12. A single family home is located on the eastern, uplands portion ofthe site. The site also contains a dock and boat lift located on the water portion of the subject site. The dock is 6 feet wide and 52 feet long. The lift is south of the dock, out near its end and is 9 feet wide and 15 feet long. 13. The existing boat lift is located south of the dock and actually straddles the property line dividing the subject site from its neighboring lot to the south. The end of the dock also crosses the property line. A south setback of 5 feet is required from the property line and the current lift intrudes into the setback. 14. The applicant proposes removing the existing boat lift and replacing it with a new boat lift on the north side of the dock. The boat lift would then be fully contained on the applicant's property. 15. The new lift would be 12 feet wide and 18 feet long and would be approximately 25 feet offshore ofthe Ordinary High Water Mark. It would be located approximately 15 feet from the south property line and approximately 25 feet from the north property line. 16. While the dock also intrudes into the setback line there would be no change to the dock. The neighbor has not objected to the dock's location. Corbett Boat lift File No.: LUA-05-013, SM, SMC-H, ECF April 26, 2005 Page 4 17. The work will be done in the time window specified by the state to avoid interfering with salmon activity in the lake. 18. Lake Washington's shoreline is classified as a Shoreline of Statewide Significance and therefore any development adjacent to it is subject to the City's Shoreline Master Program. This section of the shoreline is designated as an Urban Shoreline. 19. Staff noted that the residential designation of the subject site permits docks associated with single- family uses along this portion of the shoreline. Boat lifts are not a listed use nor are they a prohibited use and, therefore, are subject to a shoreline conditional use review. 20. Staff recommends that since a sewer line that runs along the shoreline, before the pilings are removed, it will be necessary to call the City of Renton's Sewer Maintenance Department and they will have a crew on stand-by just in case something gets broken. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The criteria for approving a Shoreline Conditional Use permit are twofold. There are City criteria and those City criteria require compliance with additional State criteria. Those criteria are as follows: Renton: Section 4-9-190.1.5: 5. Conditional Use: a. Purpose: Upon proper application, a conditional use permit may be granted. The objective of a conditional use provision is to provide more control and flexibility for implementing the regulations of the Master Program. With provisions to control undesirable effects, the scope of uses can be expanded to include many uses. b. Decision Criteria: Uses classified as conditional uses can be permitted only after consideration and by meeting such performance standards that make the use compatible with other permitted uses within that area. A conditional use permit will be granted subject to each of the following conditions: i. The use must be compatible with other permitted uses within that area. ii. The use will not interfere with the public use of public shorelines. iii. Design of the site will be compatible with the surroundings and the City'S Master Program. iv. The use shall be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the City's Master Program. v. The use meets the conditional use criteria in WAC 173-27-160. Washington State: WAC 173-27-160: Review criteria for conditional use permits. The purpose ofa conditional use permit is to provide a system within the master program which allows flexibility in the application of use , Corbett Boat lift File No.: LUA-05-013, SM, SMC-H, ECF April 26, 2005 Page 5 regulations in a manner consistent with the policies ofRCW 90.58.020. In authorizing a conditional use, special conditions may be attached to the permit by local government or the department to prevent undesirable effects of the proposed use and/or to assure consistency of the project with the act and the local master program. (I) Uses which are classified or set forth in the applicable master program as conditional uses may be authorized provided that the applicant demonstrates all of the following: (a) That the proposed use is consistent with the policies ofRCW 90.58.020 and the master program; (b) That the proposed use will not interfere with the normal public use of public shorelines; (c) That the proposed use of the site and design of the project is compatible with other authorized uses within the area and with uses planned for the area under the comprehensive plan and shoreline master program; (d) That the proposed LIse will cause no significant adverse effects to the shoreline environment in which it is to be located; and (e) That the public interest suffers no substantial detrimental effect. (2) In the granting of all conditional use permits, consideration shall be given to the cumulative impact of additional requests for like actions in the area. For example, if conditional use permits were granted for other developments in the area where similar circumstances exist the total of the conditional uses shall also remain consistent with the policies of RCW 90.58.020 and shall not produce substantial adverse effects to the shoreline environment. (3) Other uses which are not classified or set forth in the applicable master program may be authorized as conditional uses provided the applicant can demonstrate consistency with the requirements ofthis section and the requirements for conditional uses contained in the master program. (4) Uses which are specifically prohibited by the master program may not be authorized pursuant to either subsection (I) or (2) of this section. 2. The area in which the subject site is located is zoned for and developed with single-family uses. Many of the properties have docks, piers and some properties have lifts. The boat lift proposed by the applicant appears to be compatible with the uses located in this area. 3. The proposed boat lift should not interfere with any public use of the shoreline. The applicant already has a boat lift and dock and this proposal will merely relocate the boat lift to abide by required setbacks from property lines. It will not create any additional obstacles toward navigation. This shoreline is privately owned and developed with a single-family home. 4. The lift will be set back from property lines more than required by code and will not create: any untoward impacts on adjacent uses or on water-oriented uses. Corbett Boat lift File No.: LUA-05-0J3, SM, SMC-H, ECF April 26, 2005 Page 6 5. The next series of criteria are contained within the Washington Administrative Code. One of the paramount goals is to protect the ecology of the shoreline. In this case, there should be no change other than some disturbance of the lake bottom but this will occur at a time that limits interference with salmon. 6. The lot, as noted, is private and it extends out into the lake. The proposed lift serves the lot. Private uses are permitted in this area of the shoreline. The use is similar to those uses permitted in an urban shoreline. The use should not impair the public use of this section of the lakeshore or the water in its vicinity. 7. The low-scale boat lift will not interfere with any uses that might occur in this area of the lake. The comprehensive plan designates this area as suitable for single-family uses and the normal complement of accessory uses. On a lakeshore property, piers, docks and similar uses including a boat lift are considered reasonable accessory uses. 8. The proposed boat lift should not create any significant adverse affects on the shoreline environment. 9. The relocation of the boat lift should not further harm the public interest. 10. As noted in earlier decisions, the analysis of cumulative impact or impacts is hard to judge. An existing boat lift will be removed and docks already protrude out into the lake from many of the homes. Clearly, there have had to be impacts to water quality and habitat as a result of motor boating and docks shading the lake and some of the shallow areas. This additional action will probably not have much affect on the overall circumstances. 11. Since boat lifts are neither permitted nor prohibited outright, they do require review under the Conditional Use criteria. The proposal use and restoration are generally consistent with the criteria noted above. RECOMMENDATION: The Conditional Use Permit and the Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the single boat lift should be approved ORDERED THIS 26th day of April 2005. TRANSMITTED THIS 26th day of April 2005 to the parties of record: Nancy Weil 1055 S Grady Way Renton, W A 98055 Rick Corbett 2811 Mountain View Ave. N Renton, W A 98056 Jeff Sidebotham Seaborn Pile Driving 9311 SE 36th Street #204 Mercer Island, W A 98040 Corbett Boat lift File No.: LUA-05-013, SM, SMC-H, ECF April 26, 2005 Page 7 Kayren Kittrick 1055 S Grady Way Renton, W A 98055 TRANSMITTED THIS 26th day of April 2005 to the following: Mayor Kathy Keolker-Wheeler Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer Julia Medzegian, Council Liaison Larry Warren, City Attorney Gregg Zimmerman, PBPW Administrator Alex Pietsch, Economic Development Jennifer Henning, Development Services Stacy Tucker, Development Services Stan Engler, Fire Larry Meckling, Building Official Planning Commission Transportation Division Utilities Division Neil Watts, Development Services Janet Conklin, Development Services King County Journal Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Section I OOGof the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m., May 10,2005. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 110, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of$75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. An appeal must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m., May 10,2005. If the Examiner's Recommendation or Decision contains the requirement for Restrictive CoYenants, the executed Covenants will be required prior to approval by City Council or final processing of the file. You may contact this office for information on formatting covenants. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-oll-one) communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING NOTICE March 15,2005 To: Gregg Zimmerman, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator Dennis Culp, Community Services Administrator Lee Wheeler, Fire Chief From: Jennifer Henning, Development Planning "Meeting Date: Tu~sd~y.M~t(;fll'5~:2005"" "",,' },ffime: 9:00AM ", """ >,' , " ,', " Agenda listed below. Corbett Boat Lift (Fiala) LUA5-013, SM, SMC-H, ECF The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review, a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the construction of a residential boatlift. The property contains a single family residence with a 432 square-foot pier and an existing boatlift station. The proposed project would remove the existing 9' by 15' boat lift and 3 mooring piles and install a new 12' by 18' boat lift along the north side of the pier. The boatlift and three pilings to be removed are located on the neighboring property and this proposal would relocate the boatlift to within the lot boundaries and bring it into compliance with setback regulations. The boatlift is a freestanding structure that would sit directly on the lakebed. H would not be attached to the existing pier. Two existing mooring piles are located to the north of the pier and would remain. No changes are proposed to the existing pier. cc: K. Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor J. Covington, Chief Administrative Officer A. Pietsch, EDNSP Administrator ® B. Wolters, EDNSP Director ® J. Gray, Fire Prevention N. Watts, PIBlPW Development Services Director ® F. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner S. Engler, Fire Prevention ® J. Medzegian, Council S. Meyer, P/B/PW Transportation Systems Director R. Lind, Economic Development L. Warren, City Attomey ® CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 12th day of April, 2005, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner documents. This information was sent to: Jeffrey Sidebotham Contact Rick Corbett Owner Pegi Galster Party of Record (Signature of Sender).;.,.: ~~~~-~~-=""::::""::::~~:":::":"'----------r~-""=-:~-::;- /" , " ........ >.0 .... ~ ~ ••• iI ..... ,~ ..!~,.t~\.Oo1iv''''''''''''''\''~ STATE OF WASHINGTON SS COUNTY OF KING CHARLES F. KOKKO' NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF WASHINGTON COMMISSION EXPIRES MARCH 19,2006 I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy Tucker""':''''~'''_i:-';'~ signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. ~, ) 17. / Dated: t-f / ( Zr (0 S _-----:~~-==--=-~_____:'1-:-~_._-=--~:_:___:_:__-- I Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary (print): __ C--,~_l/_~J_F_~/~_I{._& ______ _ My appointment expires: ~ II~ 70 b Corbett Boat Lift LUA05-013, ECF, SM, SMC-H COMMENCING AT 9:00 AM, CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING April 19, 2005 AGENDA COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 7TH FLOOR, RENTON CITY HALL The application(s) listed are in order of application number only and not necessarily the order in which they will be heard. Items will be called for hearing at the discretion of the Hearing Examiner. PROJECT NAME: Corbett Boat Lift PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-05-013, ECF, SM, SMC-H PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the construction of a residential boatlift. The property contains a single-family residence with a pier and an existing boatlift station. The proposed project would remove the existing boat lift and piles and install a new boat lift. No changes are proposed to the existing pier. HEX Agenda 4-19-05.doc PUBLIC HEARING City of Renton Department of Planning / Building / Public Works PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: Public Hearing Date: Project Name: Applicant/Owner: Contact: File Number: Project Description: Project Location Exist. Structure Area Site Area April 19, 2005 Corbett Boatlift Rick Corbett, 2811 Mountain View Ave. N., Renton, WA 98056 Jeff Sidebotham, Seaborn Pile Driving, 9311 SE 36th Street #204, Mercer Island, WA 98040 LUA 05-013, ECF, SM, SMC-H Project Manager: Susan Fiala, AICP The applicant is requesting a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the construction of a residential boatlift. The property contains a single family residence with a pier and an existing boatlift station. The proposed project would remove the existing boat lift and piles and install a new boat lift. No changes are proposed to the existing pier. 2811 Mountain View Ave. North 135 gsf boat lift area 432 sf pier/dock area 4,300 sf Proposed New Structure Area 216 gsf (boat lift) Total Building Area gsf N/A : : ' ~--.. --. :=:§~~~t -NT32n,ij ! St- , ) 7 ! i ;. IG ! , v City of Renton P/B/PW Department Corbett Boatlift Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner LUA-05-013, SM, SMC-H, ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: APRIL 19, 2005 Page 20f7 B. EXHIBITS: Exhibit 1: Project file ("yellow file") containing the application, reports, staff comments, and other material pertinent to the review of the project. Exhibit 2: Site Plan (dated January 31, 2005) Exhibit 3: Boat Life Detail-Side and End Elevations (dated January 31,2005) Exhibit 4: Exhibit 5: Boat Lift Detail-Down and Up Positions (isometric) (dated January 31,2005) Zoning Map -Sheet C3 East (dated 12/28/2004) C. GENERAL INFORM A TION: 1. Owner of Record: Rick Corbett, 2811 Mountain View Ave. N., Renton, WA 98056 2. 3. 4. Zoning Designation: Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation: Existing Site Use: 5. Neighborhood Characteristics: Residential - 8 Dwelling Units Per Acre (R-8) Residential Single-Family (RSF) Single-Family Residential North: Residential -8 (R-8) zoning East: Lake Washington Blvd. North and Residential - 8 (R-8) zoning South: Residential -8 (R-8» zoning 6. 7. 8. West: Lake Washington Access: Site Area: Project Data: Existing dock/pier Area: Existing boat lift Area: Proposed new boat lift Area: Mountain View 4,300 sq. ft. Area 432 gsf 135 gsf 216 gsf D. HISTORICAUBACKGROUND: Action Annexation Comprehensive Plan Zoning Land Use File No. N/A N/A N/A Ordinance No. 1804 4498 4404 comments N/A N/A N/A E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE: 1. Chapter 2 Land Use Districts Section 4-2-020: Purpose and Intent of Zoning Districts Section 4-2-070: Zoning Use Table Section 4-2-130: Industrial Development Standards 2. Chapter 3 Environmental Regulations and Special Districts Section 4-3-050: Critical Areas Regulations Section 4-3-090: Shoreline Master Program Regulations HEX_Corbett. doc Date 12/0811959 02/20/1995 06/07/1993 City of Renton P/B/PW Department Corbett Boatlift Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner LUA-05-013, SM, SMC-H, ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: APRIL 19,2005 Page 30f7 3. Chapter 9 Procedures and Review Criteria Section 4-9-190: Shoreline Permits 4. Chapter 11 Definitions F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: 1. Land Use Element: Residential Single Family objectives and policies. 2. Environmental Element: Fisheries and Wildlife Resources objectives and policies. G. DEPARTMENT ANAL YSIS: 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND The applicant has requested a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the construction of a residential boatlift. The property contains a single family residence with a 432 square-foot pier and an existing boatlift station. The proposed project would remove the existing 9' by 15' boat lift and three mooring piles and install a new 12' by 18' boat lift along the north side of the existing pier. The boatlift and three pilings to be removed are currently located on the neighboring property to the south. This proposal would relocate the boatlift to be within the subject lot boundaries and bring it into compliance with setback regulations. The boatlift is a freestanding structure that would sit directly on the lakebed. It would not be attached to the existing pier. Two existing mooring piles are located to the north of the pier and would remain. No changes are proposed to the existing pier. The site is located within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of Lake Washington and is regulated by the City's Shoreline Master Program. The projected project cost will be approximately $10,000. The project would be completed within the timing conditions set by the Department of Fish and Wildlife and Corps of Engineers, July 16 -December 31. A best management plan would be implemented to minimize any impacts. The removal of materials and the delivery of the new boat lift would be completed by a barge mounted crane on Lake Washington. The site is zoned Residential - 8 (R-8) and is developed with an existing single-family dwelling and dock/pier. The subject site is designated Residential Single-Family (RSF) on the Comprehensive Plan Area map. 2. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.21C, 1971 as amended) on March 21, 2005 the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) issued a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) for the Corbett Boatlift. A 14-day appeal period commenced on March 21, 2005 and ended on April 4, 2005. No appeals of the threshold determination were filed. 3. COMPLIANCE WITH ERC MITIGATION MEASURES HEX_Corbett. doc A Determination of Non-Significance was issued by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on March 21, 2005 requiring no further environmental mitigation. City of Renton PIB/PW Department Corbett Boatlift Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner LUA-05-013, SM, SMC-H, ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: APRIL 19, 2005 Page 40f7 4. STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS Representatives from various city departments have reviewed the application materials to identify and address site plan issues from the proposed development. These comments are contained in the official file, and the essence of the comments has been incorporated into the appropriate sections of this report and the Departmental Recommendation at the end of the report. 5. CONSISTENCY WITH SHORELINE CONDITIONAL USE CRITERIA: HEX_ Corbett.doc RMC Section 4-9-190.1 lists 5 criteria that the Hearing Examiner is asked to consider such performance standards that make the use compatible with other permitted uses with in that area when making a decision on a Shoreline Conditional Use application. These include the following: (1) The use must be compatible with other permitted uses within that area. The applicant proposes to install one freestanding residential boatlift to the north side of an existing 432 sq. ft. dock located on Lake Washington. The use of the site is a single-family residence, which is consistent with the adjoining properties. The waterfront along this portion of Lake Washington is currently developed with residential water-related uses. The site currently includes a water related boat lift, but is not within the property boundaries and which the City has no record of any permits issued for the existing lift. (2) The use will not interfere with the public use of public shorelines. The proposed residential boatlift will be located near shore abutting an existing residential dock and pier. The 12-foot x 18-foot lift will meet City of Renton development standards and Building Code requirements. The proposed use is for one watercraft to be maintained at this site, which is along private shoreline. (3) Design of the site will be compatible with the surroundings and the City's Master Program. The proposed 12-foot x 18-foot freestanding residential boatlift is located approximately 25 feet off shore of the ordinary high water mark. It is approximately 15-feet from the side property line to the south and about 25 ft. from the side property line to the north. The City's Shoreline Master Program regulations required a minimum of five feet to an adjacent property line. The structure will be constructed to extend out to the end of the existing dock (approximately 52 ft. from the OHWM). Additionally, it is compatible with other properties with such structures in the surrounding area. The City's Shoreline Master Program (WAC 173-26-230 b) states the design and construction shall avoid or, if that is not possible, shall minimize and mitigate the impacts to ecological functions, and critical areas resources. The proposed residential boatlift is compatible with the objectives and policies of the City's Master Program as an accessory water use to an existing residential use. (4) The use shall be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the City's Master Program. The use is a residential accessory use often associated with single family waterfront residences. While no setbacks are established in the Comprehensive Plan or Development Regulations for boatlifts, in the City of Renton, piers and docks require a five (5) ft. side yard setback and can not exceed 80 feet in length. These regulations would not necessarily be applied to a boatlift, however, in this instance, the proposed boat lift would comply with the City specifications relative to docks. (5) The use meets the conditional use criteria in WAC 173-27-160, to provide a system within the Master Program, which allows flexibility in the application of use regulations in a manner consistent with the policies of RCW 90.58.020. In authorizing a conditional use, special conditions may be attached to the permit by local government or the department to prevent undesirable effects of the proposed use and/or to assure consistency of the project with the act and the local master program. City of Renton PIBIPW Department Corbett Boatlift Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner LUA-05-013, SM, SMC-H, ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: APRIL 19, 2005 Page 50f7 HEX_ Corbett.doc (A) Uses which are classified or set forth in the application master program as conditional uses may be authorized provided that the applicant demonstrates all the following: i) That the proposed use is consistent with the policies of RCW 90.58.020 and the master program. Lake Washington is classified as a Shoreline of Statewide Significance. The proposed private residential boatlift demonstrates compliance and/or non-applicability to the policies of RCW 90.58.020 and the master program. ii) That the proposed use will not interfere with the normal public use of public shorelines. The subject site is single-family residential private property on the shores of Lake Washington. No interference with the public use of public shoreline is anticipated to occur, as the site is not directly adjacent to any public shoreline. iii) That the proposed use of the site and design of the project is compatible with other authorized uses within the area and with uses planned for the area under the comprehensive plan and shoreline master program. The subject site is designated Residential Single-Family on the City's Comprehensive Plan and the proposed use qualifies as an accessory use to the waterfront property. The residential boatlift is compatible in design and use to the adjacent lakefront residential properties and the shoreline mater program as discussed previously. ivY That the proposed use will cause no Significant adverse effects to the shoreline environment in which it is to be located. This section of Lake Washington is designated as Urban Environment in the Shoreline Master Program regulations and is a developed shoreline of residential uses. If the boatlift is installed and maintained according to all required state and local permits, the use is not expected to cause significant adverse effect to the shoreline environment. v) That the public interest suffers no substantial detrimental effects. As the site is a private single-family residential use and the intended boatlift is the only watercraft lift proposed on the site at this time, it is not antiCipated any detrimental effects will be created of any significance than what currently exist along the shoreline of Lake Washington in this area. (8) In the granting of all conditional use permits, consideration shall be given to the cumulative impact of additional requests for like actions in the area. This single-family residential site has an existing 432 square foot dock, which is compatible with the adjacent residential properties. The applicant proposes to relocate an existing boat lift so as to site it similarly to many of the adjacent properties. A City of Renton Park, Gene Coulon Park, further to the south of this site does have a boat launch facility. The applicant's request for a residential boatlift should not have an adverse cumulative impact for this area. (C) Other uses which are not classified or set forth in the applicable master program may be authorized as conditional uses provided the applicant can demonstrate consistency with the requirements of this section and the requirements for conditional uses contained in the master program. A residential boatlift is not a use set forth in the Shoreline Master Program thereby requiring a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit. The criteria discussed in this report have demonstrated the applicant's request is consistent with the requirements. (0) Uses which are specifically prohibited by the master program may not be authorized pursuant to either subsection (A) or (B) of this section. A residential boatlift is not specifically prohibited by the City's Shoreline Master Program. City of Renton P/B/PW Department Corbett Boatlift Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner LUA-OS-013, SM, SMC-H, ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: APRIL 19, 2005 G. SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION NO.: DATE RECEIVED: DATE OF PUBLIC NOTICE: DATE APPROVED: TYPE OF ACTION(S): CITY OF RENTON SHORELINE MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1971 PERMIT FOR SHORELINE MANAGEMENT SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT LUA-05-013, SM, SMC-H, ECF February 17, 2005 February 17, 2005 [X] Substantial Development Permit [X] Conditional Use Permit [] Variance Permit Pursuant to Chapter 90.58 RCW, staff recommends that the City of Renton grant a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit. This action is proposed on the following application: Page 60f7 OWNER/APPLICANT: CONTACT: Rick Corbett, 2811 Mountain View Ave. N., Renton, WA 98056 Jeffrey Sidebotham, Seaborn Pile Driving Co., 9311 SE 36th St., Mercer Island, WA 98040 PROJECT: Corbett Boat Lift DEVELOPMENT DESCRIPTION: The applicant has requested a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the construction of a residential boatlift. The property contains a single family residence with a 432 square-foot pier and an existing boatlift station. The proposed project would remove the existing 9' by 15' boat lift and 3 mooring piles and install a new 12' by 18' boat lift along the north side of the pier. The boatlift and three pilings to be removed are located on the neighboring property and this proposal would relocate the boatlift to within the lot boundaries and bring it into compliance with setback regulations. The boatlift is a freestanding structure that would sit directly on the lakebed. It would not be attached to the existing pier. Two existing mooring piles are located to the north of the pier and would remain. No changes are proposed to the existing pier. The site is located within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of Lake Washington and is regulated by the City's Shoreline Master Program. The projected project cost will be approximately $10,000. The project would be completed within the timing conditions set by the Department of Fish and Wildlife and Corps of Engineers, July 16 -December 31. A best management plan would be implemented to minimize any impacts. The removal of materials and the delivery of the new boat lift would be completed by a barge mounted crane on Lake Washington. An Environmental (SEPA) Review Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) was issued for this project on March 21, 2005. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See Attachment "A" SEC-TWNP-R: 31-24-5E WITHIN SHORELINES OF: APPLICABLE MASTER PROGRAM: HEX_Corbett.doc Lake Washington City of Renton City of Renton PIBIPW Department Corbett Boatlift Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner LUA-05-013, SM, SMC-H, ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: APRIL 19,2005 Page 70f7 The following section/page of the Master Program is applicable to the development: Section Description Page 4-3-090.J Urban Environment page 3-25 4-3-090.K. General Use Regulations for All Shoreline Uses Page 3-26 4-3-090.L Specific Use Regulations page 3-27 4-3-090.M. Variances and Conditional Uses page 3-39 4-9-190.1.1,2,3,5 Variances and Conditional Uses Page 9-54 Staff recommends that development of this project shall be undertaken pursuant to the following terms and condition: 1. The applicant shall comply with all construction conditions by the State agencies and all construction conditions provided in the application and modifications submitted to the City. That the permit be granted pursuant to the Shoreline Management Action of 1971 and pursuant to the following: 1. The issuance of a license under the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 shall not release the applicant from compliance with federal, state, and other permit requirements. 2. This permit may be rescinded pursuant to Section 14(7) of the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 in the event the permittee fails to comply with any condition hereof. 3. A construction permit shall not be issued until twenty-one (21) days after approval by the Washington State Department of Ecology or until any review proceedings initiated within this twenty-one (21) day review period have been completed. H. RECOMMENDA TION: HEX_Corbett.doc Staff recommends approval of the Shoreline Conditional Use and Shoreline Substantial Development Permits for the Corbett Boatlift, Project File No. LUA-05-013, SM, SMC-H, ECF. 05 013 / \ ~ \ 0 1:;; -:tf {\ ~t; '\ 1 \ \0 .1.1 ~ ~ rl 0 \ o,,~ '-' ~O ~ to <l-~ 0-0-- f ~Q~\ L'\~\ b'\:.:"\ ~\L, ~\ \) E-",\~:.:.~ E.Lc. \l "t=\\~O~ \ I~ 'i \) ~.,.. 14l.\c. el.\~~ \0 ':;;.\A'fpoR.1.. "&t:.~'if' oS\~o~\ c..'lll~tl ~~"';"~-----H.:::!III~ J:\o:5I.\:'\"'N.~ L~~ A~~ ~oO\ y~ q' ., -II,;--"~-\\.':ll":-J\:;-$ ___ --:-: -It .. II'" -it =-1I.:11'~ .. , -----~.......,.;;;~_r-. -;-;'l~~:tlll ;--f\... -L.Pt-('t:..: e l?,t) -SL ~ LE -1. .... .:: b ~:~_ j 1 I I J Ii 01 :t.3~S"b ?o~~e.. \>l\c. B4~~~C'R. ~~~'tI\ >'-\ \'''O~ 'N \\\It :SoL.",,~ ~{\~~L'- ~1P I:LA U l ; c. -.. rfYL f I 1= ~ F r -..r-p r1 D IrJG G-r1S CrJ L.A ~ ~ ~ F' b (j,J~ f Co 0 Pi F b 0 ~ reo.! .. ~~ b J' ) , , ro.p..\~SE.. ~ '?R\\\?t\~ "601\\ ,\'(\ot/\t\\u.i.. ~ S't)~ft~E.. ~~\u.'VY\,: CCE_ .,H.gs ~S), \G.\~ A$:s". P~o~t:.~\'.( o"+\.\.\e.f(S . \) ..\.) P~~c..",,\ti)~ ~SOl ..... ~'A\f\\'" \\\'c .. w t\'J ~:e.\l\.It).\ ("\}I..'~ • ~ ~o S \) :~o?o~W'~ T.~'>\\l\u..'f\ a,t:)\"\\ \...\~\ >\i';\\~~ 1:. \-.\. '0 l ~ \(. yt' ~ ~'> \\ \ "-\~ l' o·~ ~\;~~~\o~· c...ou. ~~l ~ ~\ ~~ A~~l...\c.I=\\..\r! ~\t.~ c..D~'i$~\T ~ ~ ,-11.-oS'" ~1Srr :3 ~~~>1b 'S\'\?'~()Q.\ 1>c;;. tr\ \\ \.l1...L ;. ...... C t.r. o . [: ~ ~ ... ~ z-----.-. ~ -.. --------fool ~ ZONING PIBIFW TI!CHNICAL SERVICES UI04103 ~\ ..... ,i? \ CDR ----Renton dity Umiflj 'L..... 280 .yo 1:4800 ~~~: ... ~ ... C3 31 T24N R5E E 1/2 5431 ·:fe Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor April 5, 2005 Jeffrey Sidebotham Seaborn Pile Driving Co. 9311 SE 36th Street Mercer Island, WA 98040 SUBJECT: Corbett Boat Lift LUA-05-013, SM, SMC-H, ECF Dear Mr. Sidebotham: CITY. RENTON PlanningIBuildingIPublic Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator This letter is to inform you that the appeal period has ended for the Environmental Review Committee's (ERG) Determination of Non-Significance for the above-referenced project. No appeals were filed on the ERC determination and this decision is final. A Hearing Examiner Public Hearing has been scheduled for April 19, 2005, where a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit may be issued. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant are required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you one week before the hearing. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (425) 430-7382. For the Environmental Review Committee, ' .....,.-'--'</~.7~~~ Susan Fiala Senior Planner cc: Rick Corbett / Owner Pegi Galster / Party of Record ~Jl~ ~~\~ ------------l-O-SS--So-u-th-G-r-ad-y-W-a-y---R-e-nt-o-n,-W-a-sh-i-ng-t-on--9S-0-S-S-------------~ * This paper contains 50% recycled material, 30% post consumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE STA TE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING } AFFIDA VIT OF' PUBLICATION PUBLIC NOTICE Zuha Hassan. being first duly sworn on oath that she is a Legal Advertising Representative of the King County Journal a weekly newspaper, which newspaper is a legal newspaper of general circulation and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continuously as a weekly newspaper in King County, Washington. The Snoqualmie Valley Record has been approved as a Legal Newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. The notice in the exact form annexed was published in regular issues of the Snoqualmie Valley Record (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice. a Public Notice was published Monday, 3/21/05 The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $118.00 at the rate of $16.00 per inch for the first publication and NI A per inch for each subsequent insertion. • J ~ ~-'-- Zuha Hassan --~ Legal Advertising Representative, Snoqualmie Valley Record ~\\\\\\~"~IIIII/. Subscribed and sworn to me this 21 ,[ day of March, 2005. ~ ~~~ 'sio;"r-~1-t.~~ , ::::-.;j,' <0''0, '-'-1'.0: ,v' ~ . ~ ::: ' <' ''''6)'' ~ ,-." . .... • t') 1ft. ."., ~ Lt..--' ~ ~ ~"tut<J :=:CJ _' i~ Y ': "§ . /' ----<. __ 1_._ LmdaJeans . :.:;: PUGLIC :'<:: Notary Public tllr the State of Washington, Residing in SnO~~l.i.~u Washi$lQj;0·~ Ad Number: ~5~()2J P O. Number. >/(-," ~,~ ?~:::'! -~, Cost of pllblishin~ tim notice includes an affidavit surcharge. /',',.,?,r: WAS'!.,-.... . ,. ':, ~ ~, n \ NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee has issued a Determination of Non-Significance for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. Corbett Boat Lift LUA05-013, ECF Locat ion: 2811 Mountain View Avenue N. The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review, a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the construction of a residential boatlift. The property contains a single family residence with a 432 square-foot pier and an existing boatlift station. The proposed pro- ject would remove the existing 9' by 15' boat lift and 3 mooring piles and install iI new 12' bv 18' bOilt lift along the north side ~f the pier. The boatlift and three pilings to be removed are locatf'd on the neigh- boring property and this proposal would relocate the hoatlift to within the lot boundaries and bring it into compliance with set- back regulations. The boatlift is a fi'eestal1ding structure that would sit directlv on the lakebed. It would not bE' attached to the exifiting pier. Two existing moor- ing piles are 10cate(1 to the north of the pier and would remain. No changes arf' proposed to the exist- ingpier. Appeals of the environmental dptermination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on April 4, 2005. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 Rpplication fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner an~ governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional infor- mation fE'garding t.he appeal process mav he obtained from the Renton Citv CJe·rk's Ollief', (425) 430-G51 O. . Publislwd in the l{jng County Journal Mareh 21, 200e;. #858623 " ...... " "'"'' --.... ~~~~~~~ ;~"" :-.··;:'MISS;';.':"'!A-" -.' 0 01-"~', : .' (j NO ..:,. .• '-...f. ~ ..: 7'. '1' . .>' I ~ (I,) • -1-9 "1l'~", ~ ~ -i. .() '. '.L:ii: '"T1 ~ ~ ~ ~ Vb"" "': "1l : ~ '" '. CJ{/C 0: : I, "~~"" ... , 0 .... . .. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION & PUBLIC HEARING ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: Corbett Boot Lilt PROJECT NUMBER: LUA05·013, SM, SMC-H, ECF LOCATION: 2811 Mountain View Avonu. N DESCRIPTION: The applicant Is reque.tlng Environmental (SEPA) Review, a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit and a Shoreline Substantia' Development PennH tor the construction of a residential boatllft. The property contains a single family relldence with. 432 square-foot pier and an existing boatlltt station. The proposed project would remove the existing 9' by 15' boat 11ft and 3 mooring pileI and Inatall a new 12' by 18' boat Itft along the north side of the pier. The boatllft and three piling. to be removed are located on the neighboring property and this propos.' would relocate the boallift to within the lot boundarl •• lind bring It Into compliance with .etback regulatlonl. The boatlln Is a fr ... tandlng structure that would ." directly on the lakebad. It would not be attached to the existing pier. Two exl.tlng mooring pile. ar. located to the north of the pier and would remain. No chang .. are propo.ed to the existing pier. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the environmental determination mu.t be flied In writing on or before 5:00 PM on April 4, 2005. Appeals must be tiled In writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City at Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City at Renton Municipal Code Section 4-&-110.B. Additional In'ormatlon regarding the appeal proce .. may be obtained from the Renton City Cler1<'. OIIIce, (425) 430-8510. A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE 7TH FLOOR OF CITY HALL, 1055 SOUTH GRADY WAY, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON APRIL 19, 2005 AT 9:00 AM TO CONSIDER THE SHORELINE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT. IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED, THE APPEAL WILL BE HEARD AS PART OF THIS PUBLIC HEARING. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT (425) 430·7200. . DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please Include the project NUMBER when calling lor proper fII. Identification. CERTIFICA TION " '<' -"~'07 ..... .: '·,.,~4;;HING~j~-5b l~ -hl(~ , hereby certify that.3 copies of the above document '""""""",,,, .' . were post by me In conspICUOUS places or nearby the descnbed property on DATE: c1 Jd C'S SIGNED~..;Jud;r ~EST: SJIlJscribed and sworn before me, a :-otary Public:.,in and foIJhe .state ° / _~l~'Vl ,on the .::Q <6 day of .l?/t&L s>Y2Q$ . --.,L..:......L..IL.!~':4=~-?-..LJ~~~/p~ NOTARY P ;;tV MARILYN KAMCHEFF MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES 6-29-07 CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 1 ih day of March, 2005, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing ERC Determination documents. This information was sent to: Agencies Rick Corbett Pegi Galster Jeffrey Sidebotham (Signature of Sender):7~ ~ STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING ) SS ) See Attached Owner Party of Record Contact .. ·~\s·sio,v· ... ... ~ ~+,'" .. :<? ~OT.<lL'\ ~'. :: 'TJ.. :ll": t'.. ..... m. ::(/): ,t;J -(I): ~ -' \ veLlc ..: I,)?',,>,',,&, .'~_ I" ~ ,,,:'.::;9-07 .... ·:0 .? I, o,t:-•••••••• 6' -- "'" I1tAS\-\\~ ........ I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy Tucker "\\~~" ...... , ....... ,, signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: 3IUcIO{ e •• '·--n-, ----'''-"'/ / / Notary (print): _____ ··.-;·':~~;~pl+!~~~~:Tfy~_M.A~[!:i'I~fr~ 9~H~Pii~~*i£uir.'1 S~-£""geoA"6?'------------ My appointment expires: Corbett Boat Lift LUA05-013, SM, SMC-H, ECF template -affidavit of service by mailing Dept. of Ecology " Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 WSDOT Northwest Region" Attn: Ramin Pazooki King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240 PO Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 US Army Corp. of Engineers" Seattle District Office Attn: SEPA Reviewer PO Box C-3755 Seattle, WA 98124 Jamey Taylor" Depart. of Natural Resources PO Box 47015 Olympia, WA 98504-7015 KC Dev. & Environmental Servo Attn: SEPA Section 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 Metro Transit Senior Environmental Planner Gary Kriedt AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING (ERe DETERMINATIONS) WDFW -Stewart Reinbold" Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. " c/o Department of Ecology Attn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer 3190 160th Ave SE 39015 -172"d Avenue SE Bellevue, WA 98008 Auburn, WA 98092 Duwamish Tribal Office" Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program" 4717 W Marginal Way SW Attn: Ms Melissa Calvert Seattle, WA 98106-1514 39015 172"d Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092-9763 KC Wastewater Treatment Division" Office of Archaeology & Historic Environmental Planning Supervisor Preservation" Ms. Shirley Marroquin Attn: Stephanie Kramer 201 S. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050 PO Box 48343 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 Olympia, WA 98504-8343 City of Newcastle City of Kent Attn: Mr. Micheal E. Nicholson Attn: Mr. Fred Satterstrom, AICP Director of Community Development Acting Community Dev. Director 13020 SE 72"d Place 220 Fourth Avenue South Newcastle, WA 98059 Kent, WA 98032-5895 Puget Sound Energy City of Tukwila Municipal Liason Manager Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official Joe Jainga 6300 Southcenter Blvd. 201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431 PO Box 90868, MS: XRD-01W Tukwila, WA 98188 Seattle, WA 98104-3856 Bellevue, WA 98009-0868 Seattle Public Utilities Real Estate Services Title Examiner 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 PO Box 34018 Seattle, WA 98124-4018 Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS", the marked agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy of the checklist, PMT's, and the notice of application. " Also note, do not mail Jamey Taylor any of the notices she gets hers from the web. Only send her the ERC Determination paperwork. template -affidavit of service by mailing ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION & PUBLIC HEARING ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: Corbett Boat Lift PROJECT NUMBER: LUA05-013, SM, SMC-H, ECF LOCATION: 2811 Mountain View Avenue N DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review, a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the construction of a residential boatlift. The property contains a single famliy residence with a 432 square-foot pier and an existing boatlift station. The proposed project would remove the existing 9' by 15' boat lift and 3 mooring plies and install a new 12' by 18' boat lift along the north side of the pier. The boatlift and three pilings to be removed are located on the neighboring property and this proposal would relocate the boatlift to within the lot boundaries and bring it into compliance with setback regulations. The boatlift is a freestanding structure that would sit directiy on the lakebed. It would not be attached to the existing pier. Two existing mooring piles are located to the north of the pier and would remain. No changes are proposed to the existing pier. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on April 4, 2005. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE 7TH FLOOR OF CITY HALL, 1055 SOUTH GRADY WAY, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON APRIL 19, 2005 AT 9:00 AM TO CONSIDER THE SHORELINE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT. IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED, THE APPEAL WILL BE HEARD AS PART OF THIS PUBLIC HEARING. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT (425) 430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper fire identification. Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor March 18, 2005 Jeffrey Sidebotham Seaborn Pile Driving Co. 9311 SE 36th Street Mercer Island, WA 98040 SUBJECT: Corbett Boat Lift LUA-05-013, SM, SMC-H, ECF Dear Mr. Sidebotham: CITY flF RENTON PlanningIBuildingIPublic Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERG) and is to inform you that they have completed their review of the environmental impacts of the above-referenced project. The Committee, on March 15, 2005, decided that your project will be issued a Determination of Non- Significance. The City of Renton ERC has determined that it does not have a probable Significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). This decision was made by the ERC under the authority of Section 4-6-6, Renton Municipal Code, after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information, on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. Appeals of the environmental determination must· be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on April 4, 2005. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4~8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, Washington, on April 19, 2005 at 9:00 AM to consider the Shoreline Conditional Use Permit. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you one week before the hearing. If the Environmental Determination is appealed, the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at (425) 430-7382. For the Environmental Review Committee, CA~M ~usan Fiala Senior Planner cc: Rick Corbett / Owner Pegi Galster / Party of Record ------}-O-SS-S-o-u-th-G-r-ad-y-W-a-y---R-e-nt-o-n,-W-a-sh-i-ng-t-on-9S-0-S-S------~ * This paper contains 50% recycled material, 30% post consumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE t:~ Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor March 18, 2005 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 CITY F RENTON PlanningIBuildinglPublicWorks Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator Subject: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERG) on March 15, 2005: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NUMBER: LOCATION: DESCRIPTION: Corbett Boat Lift LUA05-013, ECF 2811 Mountain View Avenue N The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review, a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the construction of a residential boatlift. The property contains a single family residence with a 4~2 square-foot pier and an existing boatlift station. The. propose~ project would remove the existing 9' by 15' boat lift and.3 mooring piles and install a new 12'by 18' boat lift along the north side of the pier. The boat lift and three pilings to be removed are located on the neighboring property and this proposal would relocate the boatlift to within the lot boundaries and bring it into compliance with setback regulations. The boatlift is a freestanding structure that would sit directly on the lakebed. It would not be attached to the existing pier. Two existing mooring piles are located to the north of the pier and would remain. No changes are proposed to the existing pier. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on April 4, 2005. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Ren.ton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. If you have questions, please call me at (425) 430-7382. For the Environmental Review Committee, Q.OHx'aWJ ~susan Fiala Senior Planner cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division WDFW. Stewart . Reinbold David F. Dietzman. Department of Natural Resources WSDOT, Northwest Region Duwamish Tribal Office Karen Walter, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (Ordinance) US Army Corp. of Engineers -IEt;lI:t::u;c:l(;lolSJli'Utur~Q S_t_ep_h_a_ni_e_:_:_:_e_:_:_t_':_·G_~_:_d"'_Y"_W:_:_:_:_:-:-:-t:-:-:-:-:-:-~-:-~_::-:-n-9-8-05-5--------.~ ® This paper contains 50% recycled material, 30% post consumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE APPLICATION NO(S): PROJECT NAME: APPLICANT: CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE ADVISORY NOTES LUA05-013, ECF Corbett Boat Lift Rick Corbett LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 2811 Mountain View Avenue N DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review, a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the construction of a residential boatlift. The property contains a single family residence with a 432 square-foot pier and an existing boatlift station. The proposed project would remove the existing 9' by 15' boat lift and 3 mooring piles and install a new 12' by 18' boat lift along the north side of the pier. The boat lift and three pilings to be removed are located on the neighboring property and this proposal would relocate the boatlift to within the lot boundaries and bring it into compliance with setback regulations. The boatlift is a freestanding structure that would sit directly on the lakebed. It would not be attached to the existing pier. Two existing mooring piles are located to the north of the pier and would remain. No changes are proposed to the existing pier. LEAD AGENCY: The City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section Advisory Notes to Applicant: The fol/owing notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. 1. Applicant shall obtain required permits from the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife and the US Corp of Engineers. 2. The City of Renton owns and operates an 8" diameter Sanitary sewer Main located in Lake Washington, along the water frontage. In order to avoid damaging the existing Sewer Line, and to facilitate installation of a new Cleanout, it is requested that the contractor coordinate the shoreline work with the City of Renton Maintenance personnel (425-430-7279), at least 72 hours prior to beginning construction. 3. Should any archaeological deposits or human remains be encountered during project work, work shall immediately cease and the Washington State Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation shall be notified. 4. Temporary Erosion Control measures in accordance with the Department of Ecology Standards to be in place, if applicable. CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE APPLICATION NUMBER: LUA05-013, SM, SMC-H, ECF APPLICANT: Rick Corbett PROJECT NAME: Corbett Boat Lift DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review, a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the construction of a residential boat lift. The property contains a single family residence with a 432 square-foot pier and an existing boatlift station. The proposed project would remove the existing 9' by 15' boat lift and 3 mooring piles and install a new 12' by 18' boat lift along the north side of the pier. The boat lift and three pilings to be removed are located on the neighboring property and this proposal would relocate the boat lift to within the lot boundaries and bring it into compliance with setback regulations. The boatlift is a freestanding structure that would sit directly on the lakebed. It would not be attached to the existing pier. Two existing mooring piles are located to the north of the pier and would remain. No changes are proposed to the existing pier. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: LEAD AGENCY: 2811 Mountain View Avenue N City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section This Determination of Non-Significance is issued under WAC 197-11-340. Because other agencies of jurisdiction may be involved, the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fourteen (14) days. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on April 4, 2005. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: March 21, 2005 DATE OF DECISION: March 15, 2005 SIGNATURES: DATE DATE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING NOTICE March 15, 2005 To: Gregg Zimmerman, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator Dennis Culp, Community Services Administrator Lee Wheeler, Fire Chief From: Jennifer Henning, Development Planning Meeting Date: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 Time: 9:00AM ..... Location: Sixth Floor Conference Room #620 Agenda listed below. Corbett Boat Lift (Fiala) LUA5-013, SM, SMC-H, ECF The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review, a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the construction of a residential boatlift. The property contains a single family residence with a 432 square-foot pier and an existing boatlift station. The proposed project would remove the existing 9' by 15' boat lift and 3 mooring piles and install a new 12' by 18' boat lift along the north side ofthe pier. The boatlift and three pilings to be removed are located on the neighboring property and this proposal would relocate the boatlift to within the lot boundaries and bring it into compliance with setback regulations. The boat lift is a freestanding structure that would sit directly on the lakebed. It would not be attached to the existing pier. Two existing mooring piles are located to the north of the pier and would remain. No changes are proposed to the eXisting pier. cc; K. Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor J. Covington, Chief Administrative Officer A. Pietsch, EDNSP Administrator ® B. Wolters, EDNSP Director ® J. Gray, Fire Prevention N. Watts, P/B/PW Development Services Director ® F. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner s. Engler, Fire Prevention ® J. Medzegian, Council S. Meyer, P/B/PW Transportation Systems Director R. Lind, Economic Development L. Warren, City Attorney ® STAFF REPORT A. BACKGROUND City of Renton Department of Planning / Building / Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE ERC MEETING DATE March 15, 2005 Project Name Owner/Applicant Contact: File Number Project Description Project Location Exist. Structure Area Site Area RECOMMENDA TlON Project Location Map Corbett Boat Lift Rick Corbett, 2811 Mountain View Ave. N., Renton, WA 98056 Jeffrey Sidebotham, Seaborn Pile Driving Co., 9311 SE 36th St., Mercer Island, WA 98040 LUA04-013, ECF, SM, SMC-H Project Manager Susan Fiala The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review, a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the construction of a residential boatlift. The property contains a single family residence with a 432 square- foot pier and an existing boatlift station. The proposed project would remove the existing 9' by 15' boat lift and 3 mooring piles and install a new 12' by 18' boat lift along the north side of the pier. The boatlift and three pilings to be removed are located on the neighboring property and this proposal would relocate the boatlift to within the lot boundaries and bring it into compliance with setback regulations. The boatlift is a freestanding structure that would sit directly on the lakebed. It would not be attached to the existing pier. Two existing mooring piles are located to the north of the pier and would remain. No changes are proposed to the existing pier. (Continued on next page). 2811 Mountain View Ave. North 135 gsf boat lift area 432 sf pier/dock area 4,300 sf Proposed New Structure Area 216 gsf Total Building Area gsf N/A Staff Recommend that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Non-Significance. ~~ :R-~8' ~ ~=::::::;=~~~ ~c Erc_Corbet/.doc City a/Renton PIBIPW Department CORBETT BOAT LIFT REPORT AND DECISION OF MARCH 15. 2005 PROJECT DESCRIPTION (CONTINUED) En mental Review Committee Staff Report LUA05-0J3, ECF, SM, SMC-H Page2of3 The site is located within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of Lake Washington and is regulated by the City's Shoreline Master Program. The projected project cost will be approximately $10,000. The project would be completed within the timing conditions set by the Department of Fish and Wildlife and Corps of Engineers, July 16 -December 31. A best management plan would be implemented to minimize any impacts. The removal of materials and the delivery of the new boat lift would be completed by a barge mounted crane on Lake Washington. The location of the ordinary high water mark is indicated on the site plan and coincides with the existing rock bulkhead. B. RECOMMENDATION Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE xx Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. C. MITIGATION MEASURES No further mitigation is recommended. Advisory Notes to Applicant: DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGA TED. Issue DNS-M with 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period followed by a 14 day Appeal Period. The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. 1. Applicant shall obtain required permits from the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife and the US Corp of Engineers. 2. The City of Renton owns and operates an 8" diameter Sanitary sewer Main located in Lake Washington, along the water frontage. In order to avoid damaging the existing Sewer Line, and to facilitate installation of a new Cleanout, it is requested that the contractor coordinate the shoreline work with the City of Renton Maintenance personnel (425-430-7279), at least 72 hours prior to beginning construction. 3. Should any archaeological deposits or human remains be encountered during project work, work shall immediately cease and the Washington State Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation shall be notified. 4. Temporary Erosion Control measures in accordance with the Department of Ecology Standards to be in place, if applicable. D. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS In compliance with RCW 43.21 C. 240, the following project environmental review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under eXisting development standards and environmental regulations. 1. Earth: Impacts: The project does not require any fill or excavation of soils. All work for the new boat lift and removal of the old boat lift and old piers would be within Lake Washington. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation is recommended. Policy Nexus: N/A Erc_ Corbett. doc City of Renton PIBIPW Department CORBETT BOAT LIFT REPORT AND DECISION OF MARCH 15. 2005 2. Water/Shoreline: En mental Review Committee Staff Report LUA05-013, ECF, SM, SMC-H Page 3 of3 Impacts: The project site is located on the eastern shore of Lake Washington, off of Lake Washington Boulevard. Lake Washington is designated as an "Urban Environment" under the Shoreline Regulations. The urban designation permits a variety of uses within the shoreline boundary provided the use complies with the applicable setback established by the Master Program. In this case, the boatlift is not an outright permitted use, therefore, a conditional use permit is required and will be reviewed by the Hearing Examiner. The proposed construction activities include the removal of an existing boat lift and piers on the south side of an existing dock and the installation of a new boat lift on the north side of the dock. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation is recommended. Policy Nexus: N/A 3. PlantlAnimallWildlife Habitat: Impacts: The proposed work would occur within Lake Washington and shorelines near migration routes for several fish species, most notably Puget Sound wild chinook salmon which are listed as endangered species. Sockeye and coho salmon and steelhead, rainbow, and cutthroat trout also migrate along the shoreline. In addition, sockeye salmon are know to spawn along shorelines near the site. Construction activity could have a temporary impact on areas used for feeding and I or spawning. The proposed boat lift would not likely result in adverse impacts to the fish migration routes or spawning areas. The applicant will be required to obtain a Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) permit issued by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW). Construction methods and times to non-critical periods may be specified as conditions of the HPA. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation is recommended. Policy Nexus: N/A E. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS The proposal has been circulated to City Departmental/Divisional Reviewers for their review. Where applicable, these comments have been incorporated into the text of this report as Mitigation Measures and/or Notes to Applicant. ~ Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. __ Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. Environmental Determination Appeal Process Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM April 4. 2005. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, {425} 430-6510. Erc_ Corbett.doc / --t. 0 !j:; -:t~ Q{\ ~t; .1 J 0 ~~ cJ-O a...{O \ 1: \ ~ \ );-~ '1. 0 ,-\ 'I \ 1 ~. .u \ 0c:-'- .~ ~ ~ J"-=:J (Vo ~~ 61,,'l.. S~/f.;'s. ~> tin., ~ , '\ 1 ~ ~ "'Q 0-I>- \ , -::r o I ...{) ~~ .< ~ g .5 ~g 130~\ L,~\ \)~.:"\ ~\~. ~\\)E.. "./\~'\-\ ELt:..\rt\\~O~ '\ q' B<..\~'(=:, \0 ~uCfpoR..l. "B. l:. ~ Vi' 0 S\ "00 ~\ -II.:"" --'\: LI..:-l\ ::-\ I _-~-II:'/I'" _1.:-)\.1'1'''' .. -----~_~:::r"_-. .. 7"l ... :;-111 \ ,;-1\.... ~ Lt\-{~ e~ -S~ ... :\'". LE-1."::: b Q~~_ Ii! , , , i 01 1.'3~S""" 'Po~~t. Y~c. "N \\\It :SoL~~ ~i\~~LL. H!'p 1;t..A (J tic: -.. rf'fL ~ I F ~ F f -4'P,J D IrlG Gr~ crJ LA f~ ~ Fb (jrJ~ fc. 0P'iF b 0 ~ .. rcc.T .. ~~ b ~ ) " "ro.lt\~~E.. ~ ?R\'-\~\E. ~O1\\ t<\ObQ..~~~ ~ 'S.'I)\\.f\~E... '\) ~\u. 'ft'\. : C Of. • .l \. 6S ~s1, \ ~ t ~ A~:r-P~o\>t:.~\'.l o"+\.,,\e.~ - \) ..l.) p\{\$..\\,,~- -- ~SOI tt-~"\fI'''-\ \h'C.~ i\\L R>e.W\II\l (~\ .... -'\ &0 5 \:, ;~ofo~~~ 'I.~">\\'\l.L'F\ 'e>~h\ \...\r...:\ ~\f'I\\~~ 1:.\-.\ ~ l~¥..€:·~~~'r\\"-\G..1Q·~ ~r ~ ~cc.~ \0)-.\· c..OQ.~1'-l ~ ~\~~ f\~~"\!..P.~T! ~\C ... ~ c..t>~'B~\T t> ~ 1-ll ... -O'5" : .. . -/. :-. :: .. ' ...... ,-.. =====================================================--- j ··ex.n~~> \b "S1A?f0Q.\ "bo,....' \\\.lLL .- ~') $ ~~~ l\L C'\4~~~12.5 ~O~ \.....,~\~(.\ ., .,' ....... e~ ZONING + !R + PIBIPW TBCllNlCAL IIBIlViCBS a UIl8IO+ CDR h 200 400 C3 1:4800 31 T24N R5E E 1/ Jl)NING MAP BOeK RESIDENTIAL ~ Resource Conservation ~ Residential 1 dulac a Residential 4-dulac ~ Residential 8 dulac ~ Residential Manufactured Homes I R-IO I Residential 10 dulac I R-14! Residential 14 dulac I RM-rl Residential Multi-Family I RH-T I Residential Multi-Family Traditional I RH-U I Residential Multi-Family Urban Center- MIXED USE CENTER ~ Center Village Iuc-Ntl Urban Center -North 1 IUC-NZ! Urban Center -North 2 o Center Downtown- ~ Commercial/Office/Residential COMMERCIAL o Commercial Arterial- @] Commercial Office-o Commercial Neighborhood 833 \ ~J~ 212:iN Rl)E . INDUSTRW. [E!J Indu~al -Heavy o Ind~ial -Medium o In~ •. laJ -Li&bt . .. ,:¥ L. IlL ........ ~ .. '1'\0- <P) ofubJicJy ~.e.t') _____ Renton City Limits _. __ ._ Adjacent City IJmils _ Book Pages Boundary 1T2 KROLL PAGE • May lncllufe ~rlay Districts. See Appendix maps. Forf'"addiUonal regulations in Overlay Districla. P,lease _ see RMC 4-3. PAGE# INDEX SECTfTOWNJRANGE Printed by Print & Mail Svcs, City of Renton 0' .. tI: • .. I It City of Renton Department of Planning / Building / Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 3, 2005 APPLICATION NO: LUA05-013, SM, SMC-H, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: APPLICANT: Rick Corbett PROJECT MANAGE PROJECT TITLE: Corbett Boat Lift SITE AREA: 4,300 s uare feet BUILDING AREA ( ross): N/A LOCATION: 2811 Mountain View Avenue N I WORK ORDER NO: 77380 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review, a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the construction of a residential boatlift. The property contains a single family residence with a 432 square-foot pier and an existing boatlift station. The proposed project would remove the existing 9' by 15' boat lift and 3 mooring piles and install a new 12' by 18' boat lift along the north side of the pier. The boatlift and pilings to be removed are located on the neighboring property and this proposal would relocate the boatlift to within the lot boundaries and bring it into compliance with setback regulations. The boatlift is a freestanding structure that would sit directly on the lakebed. It would not be attached to the existing pier. Two existing mooring piles (not shown on site plan) are located to the north of the pier. These would remain and no changes are proposed to the existing pier. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing_ Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional int mation is needed to properly assess this proposal. Date City of Renton Department of Planning / Building / Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET <::' REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: LLcn APPLICATION NO: LUA05-013, SM, SMC-H, ECF APPLICANT: Rick Corbett PROJECT TITLE: Corbett Boat Lift SITE AREA: 4,300 s uare feet LOCATION: 2811 Mountain View Avenue N COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 3, 2005 DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY 17,2005 PROJECT MANAGER: Susan Fiala PLAN REVIEW: Jan lilian BUILDING AREA ( ross): N/A WORK ORDER NO: 77380 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review, a Shoreline Conditi Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the construction of a residential boatlift. The property contains G with a 432 square-foot pier and an existing boatlift station. The proposed project would remove the existing 9' by 15' boat lift and 3 mooring piles and install a new 12' by 18' boat lift along the north side of the pier. The boatlift and pilings to be removed are located on the neighboring property and this proposal would relocate the boatlift to within the lot boundaries and bring it into compliance with setback regulations. The boatlift is a freestanding structure that would sit directly on the lakebed. It would not be attached to the existing pier. Two existing mooring piles (not shown on site plan) are located to the north of the pier. These would remain and no changes are proposed to the existing pier. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy! HistoridCultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED /lJ;MEN~ C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. I?4tt~!?ff/ Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date City 1.. •• {en ton Department of Planning / Building / Public ~vorks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICA TION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Prlrk..s COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 3, 2005> APPLICATION NO: LUA05-013, SM, SMC-H, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY 17, 2ci~ ." ~ APPLICANT: Rick Corbett PROJECT MANAGER: Susan Fiala ~~ cd n -i'1 I-l nl PROJECT TITLE: Corbett Boat Lift PLAN REVIEW: Jan lilian -<:31 f'Y\ H2m < SITE AREA: 4,300 square feet BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A ~~ ~ :59 c::::> ~d LOCATION: 2811 Mountain View Avenue N WORK ORDER NO: 77380 0 2 (.J1 n SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review, a Shoreline Conditicfflal Use Permit and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the construction of a residential boatlift. The property contains a single family residence with a 432 square-foot pier and an existing boatlift station. The proposed project would remove the existing 9' by 15' boat lift and 3 mooring piles and install a new 12' by 18' boat lift along the north side of the pier. The boatlift and pilings to be removed are located on the neighboring property and this proposal would relocate the boatlift to within the lot boundaries and bring it into compliance with setback regulations. The boatlift is a freestanding structure that would sit directly on the lakebed. It would not be attached to the existing pier. Two existing mooring piles (not shown on site plan) are located to the north of the pier. These would remain and no changes are proposed to the existing pier. A_ ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e_g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS ~tNU-~~vIo~M. We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impacl or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. ~~ Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date I • City of Renton Department of Planning / Building / Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:Phn 'lCeV\'eW COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 3, 2005 APPLICATION NO: LUA05-013, SM, SMC-H, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY 17, 2005 APPLICANT: Rick Corbett PROJECT MANAGER: Susan Fiala ~'" "",' PROJECT TITLE: Corbett Boat Lift PLAN REVIEW: Jan lilian I-te , .. ' 1./ .... " SITE AREA: 4,300 square feet BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A ",jt,.' () 0 20o~ 1,\(,"" WORK ORDER NO: 77380 <.:; D/l//0 LOCATION: 2811 Mountain View Avenue N ,- SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review, a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the construction of a residential boatlift. The property contains a single family residence with a 432 square-foot pier and an existing boatlift station. The proposed project would remove the existing 9' by 15' boat lift and 3 mooring piles and install a new 12' by 18' boat lift along the north side of the pier. The boatlift and pilings to be removed are located on the neighboring property and this proposal would relocate the boatlift to within the lot boundaries and bring it into compliance with setback regulations. The boatlift is a freestanding structure that would sit directly on the lakebed. It would not be attached to the existing pier. Two existing mooring piles (not shown on site plan) are located to the north of the pier. These would remain and no changes are proposed to the existing pier. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aeslhetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Ulilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet 8. POLICY-RELA TED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS E~~·~/~~ We have re lewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal, Signature of Director Date ' , City oenton Department of Planning / Building / Pu_ .. ~ _ Vorks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT&M I/JfoAbn-.b ~ COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 3, 2005 APPLICATION NO: LUA05-013, tt., SMf-H, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY 17,2005 APPLICANT: Rick Corbett PROJECT MANAGER: Susan Fiala PROJECT TITLE: Corbett Boat Lift PLAN REVIEW: Jan lilian SITE AREA: 4,300 square feet BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A LOCATION: 2811 Mountain View Avenue N WORK ORDER NO: 77380 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review, a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the construction of a residential boatlift. The property contains a single family residence with a 432 square-foot pier and an existing boatlift station. The proposed project would remove the existing 9' by 15' boat lift and 3 mooring piles and install a new 12' by 18' boat lift along the north side of the pier. The boatlift and pilings to be removed are located on the neighboring property and this proposal would relocate the boatlift to within the lot boundaries and bring it into compliance with setback regulations. The boatlift is a freestanding structure that would sit directly on the lakebed. It would not be attached to the existing pier. Two existing mooring piles (not shown on site plan) are located to the north of the pier. These would remain and no changes are proposed to the existing pier. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Air Water Plants Land/Shoreline Use Animals Environmental Health Energy/ Natural Resources 8. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENT~ fI AA "7/ A _ _ t? ~~/~~ . Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Housing Aesthetics Light/Glare Recreation Utilities Transportation Public Services Historic/Cultural Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Date r'" , City of Renton Department of Planning / BUilding / Public Walks .; ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT A P P Lie A T ION t:. ~'1L1~U1c! L.J C='C= T . -. -.. ... i .,..-, : REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: t--I re...-COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 3; 20<&8 ,1 7 2005 APPLICATION NO: LUA05-013, SM, SMC-H, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY 17,2005 l I ;' " APPLICANT: Rick Corbett PROJECT MANAGER: Susan Fiala l. ' -___ 0 •• ___________ . -~ •.. ~--~. ---------PROJECT TITLE: Corbett Boat Lift PLAN REVIEW: Jan lilian SITE AREA: 4,300 square feet BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A LOCATION: 2811 Mountain View Avenue N WORK ORDER NO: 77380 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review, a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the construction of a residential boatlift, The property contains a single family residence with a 432 square-foot pier and an existing boatlift station, The proposed project would remove the existing 9' by 15' boat lift and 3 mooring piles and install a new 12' by 18' boat lift along the north side of the pier. The boatlift and pilings to be removed are located on the neighboring property and this proposal would relocate the boatlift to within the lot boundaries and bring it into compliance with setback regulations. The boatlift is a freestanding structure that would sit directly on the lakebed. It would not be attached to the existing pier. Two existing mooring piles (not shown on site plan) are located to the north of the pier. These would remain and no changes are proposed to the existing pier. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housinq Air Aesthetics Water Liqht/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy! Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS City of Renton Department of Planning / BUilding / Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: SVc'S COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 3, 2005 CF DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY 17, 200 VEO APPLICANT: Rick Corbett PROJECT MANAGER: Susan Fiala PROJECT TITLE: Corbett Boat Lift PLAN REVIEW: Jan lilian SITE AREA: 4,300 s uare feet BUILDING AREA ( ross): N/A CITY OF RENTON LOCATION: 2811 Mountain View Avenue N WORK ORDER NO: 77380 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review, a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the construction of a residential boatlift. The property contains a single family residence with a 432 square-foot pier and an existing boatlift station. The proposed project would remove the existing 9' by 15' boat lift and 3 mooring piles and install a new 12' by 18' boat lift along the north side of the pier. The boatlift and pilings to be removed are located on the neighboring property and this proposal would relocate the boatlift to within the lot boundaries and bring it into compliance with setback regulations. The boatlift is a freestanding structure that would sit directly on the lakebed. It would not be attached to the existing pier. Two existing mooring piles (not shown on site plan) are located to the north of the pier. These would remain and no changes are proposed to the existing pier. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS City of Renton Department of Planning / Building / Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:' 1 rdf'tv(',f 4tt ~ t'lr\ COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 3, 2005 APPLICATION NO: LUA05-013, SM, SM~-H, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY 17,2005 APPLICANT: Rick Corbett PROJECT MANAGER: Susan Fiala PROJECT TITLE: Corbett Boat Lift PLAN REVIEW: Jan lilian SITE AREA: 4,300 square feet BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A LOCATION: 2811 Mountain View Avenue N WORK ORDER NO: 77380 ..... _ I a 2005 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review, a Shoreline Con;ti6n'~~ Permit and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the construction of a residential boatlift. The property contains a single family residence with a 432 square-foot pier and an existing boatlift station. The proposed project would remove the existing 9' by 15' boat lift and 3 mooring piles and install a new 12' by 18' boat lift along the north side of the pier. The boatlift and pilings to be removed are located on the neighboring property and this proposal would relocate the boatlift to within the lot boundaries and bring it into compliance with setback regulations. The boatlift is a freestanding structure that would sit directly on the lakebed. It would not be attached to the existing pier. Two existing mooring piles (not shown on site plan) are located to the north of the pier. These would remain and no changes are proposed to the existing pier. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet IJ4 B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. ~7Jt-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date City of nenton Department of Planning / Building / Pub./~ Norks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: {:ooq,yucfl' ~{\ COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 3, 2005 APPLICATION NO: LUA05-013, SM, SMC-H, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY 17,2005 APPLICANT: Rick Corbett PROJECT MANAGER: Susan Fiala PROJECT TITLE: Corbett Boat Lift PLAN REVIEW: Jan lilian SITE AREA: 4,300 square feet BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A LOCATION: 2811 Mountain View Avenue N WORK ORDER NO: 77380 FEB 18 ?nns; -_-v SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review, a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the construction of a residential boatlift. The property cdnlal('l./81~'IJ9l9=!.1amily residence with a 432 square-foot pier and an existing boatlift station. The proposed project would remove the existing 9' by 15' boat lift and 3 mooring piles and install a new 12' by 18' boat lift along the north side of the pier. The boatlift and pilings to be removed are located on the neighboring property and this proposal would relocate the boatlift to within the lot boundaries and bring it into compliance with setback regulations. The boatlift is a freestanding structure that would sit directly on the lakebed. It would not be attached to the existing pier. Two existing mooring piles (not shown on site plan) are located to the north of the pier. These would remain and no changes are proposed to the existing pier. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10.000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas whelC 'additional information is needeg,to properly assess this proposal. " ~ Date DATE: February 17, 2005 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA05-013, SM, SMC-H, ECF PROJECT NAME: Corbett Boat Lift PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review, a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit lor the construction of a residential beaUil!. The property contains a single family residence with a 432 square-foot pier and an existing boaUift station. The proposed project would remove the existing 9' by 15' boatUlt and 3 mooring piles and install a new 12' by 18' boat !ill along the north side at the pier. The boatlift and pilings to be removed are located on the neighboring property and this proposal would retocal8 the boatlift to within the lot boundaries and bring it into compliance with setback regulations. The boatlll! IS a freestanding structure that would sit directly on the lakebed. It would not be attached to the exist'lng pier. Two existing mooring plies (not shown on site plan) are located to the north of the pier. These would remain and no changes are proposed to the existing pier. PROJECT LOCATION: 2811 Mountain View Avenue N OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE, MITIGATED (ONS-M): As the Lead Agency, the CIty at Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore. as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.11 0, the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS-M process to give notice that a DNS- M is IIkety to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS·M are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance- Mttigated (DNS·M). A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: January 31 , 2005 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: February 17, 2005 APPLICANT/PROJECT CONTACT PERSON: Jeff Sidebotham, Seaborn Pile Driving Co. Tel: (206) 236·1700 Permtte/Revlew Requested: Environmental (SEPA) Review, Shoreline Substantial Development Permit, and Shoreline Condillonal Use Permit Other P.rmlts which may be required: Building Permit Requested Studies: NlA Location where application may be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Department, Development Services Division, Sixth Floor Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055 PUBLIC HEARING: A Public hearing is tentatively scheduled lor April 19 2005 before the Renton Hearing Examiner in Renton Council Chambers. Hearings begin at 9:00 AM on the 7th floor of the new Renton City Hall located at 1055 South Grady Way. CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: ZonlnglLand Use: Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: The subject site is localed within the ResidentIal Single family (RSF) Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation, and is zoned Residential -8 Dwelling Units per Acre (R-8). The proposal is consistent with the uses and policies establish by these land use and zoning designations contingent on approval of the Conditional Use Permit. Compliance with specific development standards wilt be analyzed during further review of the project. Environmental (SEPAl Checklist The project will be subject to the City' s Environmental SEPA Ordinance Procedures, Zoning Code, Shoreline Master Program, CritICal Areas Regulations. Proposed MItigation Measures: International Building Code, Public Works Standards, and other codes and regulations where applicable. Mitigation Measures may be imposed on the proposed project. These recommended Mitigation Measures address project impacts not covered by existing codes and regulations as cited above. Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Susan Fiala, Senior Planner, Development Services Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055, by 5:00 PM on March 3, 2005. This matler IS also scheduled for a public hearing on April 19. 2005 at 9:00 AM, Council Chambers, Seventh Floor, Renton City Hall. 1055 South Grady Way. Renton. If you are interested in attending the hearing, please contact the Development Services Division. (425) 430-7282, to ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled. If comments cannot be submitted in wrtIing by the date indicated above. you may sUIf appear at the hearing and present your comments on the proposal belore the Hearing Examiner. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional information by mail, please contact the project manager. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party 01 record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: Susan Fiala, Senior Planner; Tel: (425) 430-7382 PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed proJect, complete this form and return to: City of Renton, Development Planning, 1055 So. Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. File NoJName: LUA05-013, SM, SMC-H, ECF I Corbelt Boat Lilt NAME; MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO.: ________ _ CERTIFICATION --, r:2 -~-AL£~ • I, ::~ 114nef , hereby certify that ~ copies of the above docum~~~"'\ON·I?·.~'1tO\ were~ by mei}; I conspicuous places or nearby the described property orf ~~:~~ ~~ .... ~\ ~ ~ ;O:'::;;~OIARY~"'" DATE: 1-( 11/c:6 SIGNED: > (j _ .cd(j~'" \8 -B·~C CJl j < , '. pu,-: ?: . ". !C:O' A~EST: Subscribed and sworn before me, a No~ary Public, in and for the State oh~ashington resi5li,n~. • •••• ~:.1.~.,~ .. :.:··:r.!} ,~"1fU ,on the /1 day of MC'l-r" h . 01?IcU~ru:-.K Of=\f'J,'~~)' NOT AR Y PUBLIC SIGNATURE: ' . CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 1ih day of February, 2005, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing NOA, Environmental Checklist, PMT's documents. This information was sent to: " ':,:;;t,!I;:i;~,~h1~::\~!I;;').r, '''''''''''li{r, " ,~\r;L,\ , j\ ;iM~\~i;,:.n,,<f:' }tV ,',' ,'.' ',' ., ' ':.'[,';\":;;\1 Repres:eOiing·;;,,,\ Agencies See Attached Surrounding Property Owners -NOA only See Attached (Signature of Sender).;...: _----"'.-....;) ':;""...:..',4.) __ --,...;.:..c...... ______________ _ STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING ) '- ) SS ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Holly Graber ,J{ ,,:;;:,""! signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: -------- Notary (Print): My appointment expires: Corbett Boat Lift LUA05-016, SM, SMC-H, ECF template -affidavit of service by mailing Dept. of Ecology * Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 WSDOT Northwest Region * Attn: Ramin Pazooki King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240 PO Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 US Army Corp. of Engineers * Seattle District Office Attn: SEPA Reviewer PO Box C-3755 Seattle, WA 98124 Jamey Taylor * Depart. of Natural Resources PO Box 47015 Olympia, WA 98504-7015 KC Dev. & Environmental Servo Attn: SEPA Section 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Renton, W A 98055-1219 Metro Transit Senior Environmental Planner Gary Kriedt AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING (ERe DETERMINATIONS) WDFW -Stewart Reinbold * Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. ' c/o Department of Ecology Attn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer 3190 160th Ave SE 39015 -172nd Avenue SE Bellevue, WA 98008 Auburn, WA 98092 Duwamish Tribal Office * Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program' 4717 W Marginal Way SW Attn: Ms Melissa Calvert Seattle, WA 98106-1514 39015 172nd Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092-9763 KC Wastewater Treatment Division' Office of Archaeology & Historic Environmental Planning Supervisor Preservation' Ms. Shirley Marroquin Attn: Stephanie Kramer 201 S. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050 PO Box 48343 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 Olympia, WA 98504-8343 City of Newcastle City of Kent Attn: Mr. Micheal E. Nicholson Attn: Mr. Fred Satterstrom, AICP Director of Community Development Acting Community Dev. Director 13020 SE 72nd Place 220 Fourth Avenue South Newcastle, WA 98059 Kent, WA 98032-5895 Puget Sound Energy City of Tukwila Municipal Liason Manager Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official Joe Jainga 6300 Southcenter Blvd. 201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431 PO Box 90868, MS: XRD-01W Tukwila, WA 98188 Seattle, WA 98104-3856 Bellevue, WA 98009-0868 Seattle Public Utilities Real Estate Services Title Examiner 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 PO Box 34018 Seattle, WA 98124-4018 - Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS", the marked agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy of the checklist, PMT's, and the notice of application. * Also note, do not mail Jamey Taylor any of the notices she gets hers from the web. Only send her the ERC Determination paperwork. template -affidavit of service by mailing ~ 3342 HJ4046d'7 BISIACK RICHARD 2801 MT VIEW AV N RENTON W A 98056 334210401009 BURROUGHS JOHN D 2815 MOUNTAIN VIEW AV N RENTON WA 98056 4210405000 BITNEY JON ELL M 2727 MOUNTIAN VIEW AV N RENTON WA 98056 334210398502 DUBOIS PEGGI L+GALSTER MART 2907 MOUNTAIN VIEW AV N RENTON W A 98056 334210049006-N~ c\e\\V~\~ ecO 334210048503 GOBEL PAUL R+JULIA C OS z.\z-~1~ HAMADEH NABIL & GHADA 2100 LK WASHINGTON BL Nd101 2908 LAKE WASHINGTON BL N RENTON WA 98056 RENTON WA 98056 334210395300 MARSHALL R C B 2909 MOUNTAIN VIEW DR RENTON WA 98056 334210404003 PRITCHARD MARC & KAAREN 2807 MOUNTAIN VIEW AV N RENTON WA 98056 334210394006 SHANE FAMILY LTD PARTNERSHIP 2519 6TH AV SEATTLE WA 98121 334210404805 WINTER MARLENE R 2731 MT VIEW AV N RENTON W A 98056 334210400902 MAXWELL STEVEN A+MARCIE E PO BOX 2048 RENTON WA 98056 334210048008 RITUALO RANDY & LINDA 701 N 30TH ST RENTON WA 98056 334210047505 SPENGLER SCOTT +BAIN MARSHA 2902 LK WASHINGTON BL N RENTON WA 98056 334210402908 CORBETT RICK 2811 MOUNTAIN VIEW AV N RENTON, WA 98056 2405900407,062305900508 BURLINGTON NORTHRN SANTA FE ATTN: PROP TAX PO BOX 96189 FORT WORTH TX 76161 334210055607 FRISVOLD LARRY A+CYNDA B 707 NORTH 29TH STREET RENTON WA 98056 334210404508 KEPPLER WILLIAM F+DEBRA L 2805 MOUNTIAN VIEW AV N RENTON WA 98056 334210056506 MCWILLIAMS DONALD E 2820 LK WASHINGTON BL N RENTON WA 98055 334210055508 SANCHEZ ALEX 703 N 29TH ST RENTON WA 98056 NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (DN,S-M) DATE: February 17, 2005 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA05-013, SM, SMC-H, ECF PROJECT NAME: Corbett Boat Lift PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review, a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the construction of a residential boatlift. The property contains a single family residence with a 432 square-foot pier and an existing boatlift station. The proposed project would remove the existing 9' by 15' boat lift and 3 mooring piles and install a new 12' by 18' boat lift along the north side of the pier. The boatlift and pilings to be removed are located on the neighboring property and this proposal would relocate the boatiift to within the lot boundaries and bring it into compliance with setback regulations. The boatlift is a freestanding structure that would sit directly on the lakebed. It would not be attached to the existing pier. Two existing mooring piles (not shown on site plan) are located to the north of the pier. These would remain and no changes are proposed to the existing pier. PROJECT LOCATION: 2811 Mountain View Avenue N OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE, MITIGATED (DNS-M): As the Lead Agency, the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore, as permitted under the RCW 43.21 C.11 0, the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS-M process to give notice that a DNS- M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance- Mitigated (DNS-M). A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: January 31, 2005 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: February 17, 2005 APPLICANT/PROJECT CONTACT PERSON: Jeff Sidebotham, Seabom Pile Driving Co. Tel: (206) 236-1700 Permits/Review Requested: Other Permits which may be required: Requested Studies: Location where application may be reviewed: PUBLIC HEARING: CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Zoning/Land Use: Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Development Regulations Used For Project MItigation: Environmental (SEPA) Review, Shoreline Substantial Development Permit, and Shoreline Conditional Use Permit Building Permit NlA Planning/Building/Public Works Department, Development Services Division, Sixth Floor Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055 A Public hearing is tentatively scheduled for April 19, 2005 before the Renton Hearing Examiner in Renton Council Chambers. Hearings begin at 9:00 AM on the 7th floor of the new Renton City Hall located at 1055 South Grady Way. The subject site is located within the Residential Single Family (RSF) Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation, and is zoned Residential - 8 Dwelling Units per Acre (R-8). The proposal is consistent with the uses and policies establish by these land use and zoning designations contingent on approval of the Conditional Use Permit. Compliance with specific development standards will be analyzed during further review of the project. Environmental (SEPA) Checklist The project will be subject to the City' s Environmental SEPA Ordinance Procedures, Zoning Code, Shoreline Master Program, Critical Areas Regulations, Proposed Mitigation Measures: International Building Code, Public Works regulations where applicable. ards, and other codes and Mitigation Measures may be imposed on the proposed project. These recommended Mitigation Measures address project impacts not covered by existing codes and regulations as cited above. Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Susan Fiala, Senior Planner, Development Services Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055, by 5:00 PM on March 3, 2005. This matter is also scheduled for a public hearing on April 19. 2005, at 9:00 AM, Council Chambers, Seventh Floor, Renton City Hall. 1055 South Grady Way, Renton. If you are interested in attending the hearing, please contact the Development Services Division, (425) 430-7282, to ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled. If comments cannot be submitted in writing by the date indicated above, you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments on the proposal before the Hearing Examiner. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional information by mail, please contact the project manager. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: Susan Fiala, Senior Planner; Tel: (425) 430-7382 I PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION I If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project, complete this form and return to: City of Renton, Development Planning, 1055 So. Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. File No.lName: LUA05-013, SM, SMC-H, ECF / Corbett Boat Lift NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO.: CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 1 ih day of February, 2005, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Acceptance Letter documents. This information was sent to: I'it!j, Name ':':', Representing Jeffrey Sidebotham Contact Rick Corbett Owner (Signature of Sender):J-zit ~1 ~ ,) 1f1 j.V STATE OF WASHINGTON ,U SS COUNTY OF KING I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy Tucker signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. .., or Dated: ..:J -[1 -) ---..,;..----- Notary (Print): My appointment expires: Corbett Boat Lift LUA05-013, SM, SMC-H, ECF ~M! Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor February 17, 200S Jeffrey Sidebotham Seaborn Pile Driving Co. 9311 SE 36th Street Mercer Island, WA 98040 Subject: Corbett Boat Lift LUA-OS-013, SM, SMC-H, ECF Dear Mr. Sidebotham: CIT~ 3F RENTON PlanningIBuildinglPublic Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on March 15, 2005. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. In addition, this matter is tentatively scheduled for a Public Hearing on April 19, 2005 at 9:00 AM, Council Chambers, Seventh Floor, Renton City Hall, 10S5 South Grady Way, Renton. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant are required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you one week before the hearing .. Please contact me at (42S) 430-7382 if you have any questions. Susan Fiala Senior Planner cc: Rick Corbett / Owner ------------I-O-55-S-o-u-th-O-r-ad-y-W-a-y---R-e-nt-on-,-W-a-Sh-i-ng-t-on--98-0-5-5-------------·~ ® This paper contains 50% recycled material, 30% post consumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE PROPERTY OWNER(S) NAME: APPLICANT (if other than owner) NAME: COMPANY (if applicable): ADDRESS: CITY: ZIP: TELEPHONE NUMBER CONTACT PERSON COMPANY (if applicable): :SS'A-Bc;R.~ 'D\~ ~q(; 1}J(A~ ... ADDRESS: '13l \ '5 E. "3 b'11'\ 5T ~ TELEPHONE NUMBER AND E-MAIL ADDRESS: ;).06--.2. 36-1'100 - Q:\ WEB\PW\DEVSERV\Fonns\P\anning\masterapp,doc08l29/03 05 013 PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: CO~V;~\\ l.)o~ Ll~' PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)lLOCATION AND ZIP CODE: .18 \ \ VY\O(A~\F\\~ \he.'-N A\)i: N- /2.<;:. ~\O}J (\N t-t--CfSO')b KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): 33Li ~l D -Lf01Gt EXISTING LAND USE(S):'5l~<Alc. ~t\.-m~L'i PROPOSED LAND USE(S):".J\~GL~~~W\\\..,,\ EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): EXISTING ZONING: ~-8 PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): .~ SITE AREA (in square feet): ?\~OO ,.t.~' . i' ~.: ' . I SQUARE FOOTAGE OF ROADWAYS TO BE DEDICATED FOR SUBDIVISIONS OR PRIVATE STREETS SERVING THREE LOTS OR MORE (if applicable): N/Pr PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET ACRE (if applicable): ~ (f~" NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable): N I i\-' NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): ~ /r)' - PRC oCT INFORMATION (contim ) r---~~--------L---------------------~ . NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): PROJECT VALUE: O~~~ SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): ~\~ SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): .18,\0 IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): o AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA ONE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL o AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA TWO BUILDINGS (if applicable): ~ Ip. o FLOOD HAZARD AREA _____ sq. ft. SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): Lt·)l. ~ \\.\>Io~-o GEOLOGIC HAZARD ___ sq.ft. ____ sq.ft. ____ sq. ft. ____ sq. ft. NET FLOOR AREA OF NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if o HABITAT CONSERVATION applicable): .q~)... SQ". ~\ \>\~~_ NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE )( SHORELINE STREAMS AND LAKES o WETLANDS NEW PROJECT (if applicable): ·~I~· LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY al descri tion on se arate sheet with the followin information included SITUATE IN THE "5.E.. QUARTER OF SECTION 3l , TOWNSHIP~ RANGE 5' , IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES List all land use applications being applied for: 1. /-i!5X Condi(b'Q ~ tlse. :J1z,{)O 0 3. f/lVl~. e/A/~-£J ,YZ)cp 2. 5lu)rdine 5tkftcm.J.~ /lcul?r~i/~~()O 4. <:: Staff will calculate applicable fees and postage: $, ___ _ J"::~..II2;..="---'~~~~~~IO...-~~__:_-' declare that I am (please check one) • ~rrent owner of the property tion or ____ the authorized representative to act for a corporation (please attach proof ofa'U::~~~tiOn) and that the foregoing swe rein ntained and the information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the baSk ~f my knowledge and belief. I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that ts.. iC ha 1" d {! 0 b AI it signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be hislheritheir free and voluntary act for the (Signature of OwnerlRepresentative) (Signature of OwnerlRepresentative) Q:\WEB\PW\DEVSERWorms\Planning\masterapp.doc08/29/03 uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. \\\",,11111'''''''''/ ~:~ ...... \ s~F}C?ry '~, ~ .~ "~lM ~ ... <9«, ~ i , .... '\'4' . c-+-· .. ~ ~ 'I ~ .', ..o'.:..>.1£. . J ,-, li .:' 0 T A JY}; \~ \ b-L~~~*: ... :*: ,:~. ~ C .:~ ~ Notary Public in and for the State of Washington \. ..,' .• ~~ UaLl \)~~.<O I '\ :A: .... ~ 10. '2: ••.• .c..,. ~ ... <:-' OF: ...... -;.v.~,*,,,, )11 WI'.":;1\ "~,,,, """U,tl'\"" . . Pet ...,. b It. Notary (Print) Go Id J 4. ~,,~ y D My appointment eXPireS: __ ...Jo.(y"--~...J!~O_--=tJ;..",,:::~~ __ • .• l1g County: Assessor Property Characteristics Report .. " Assessor Legal Description Records: Account Number 334210402908 1 Record Number 101 -05 79-80-81 AHILLMANS LK WN GARDEN OF EDEN # 1POR ~L" OFJ-OTS & 2NQ CL SH LOS AOJBEG NXN M~R LN WITH S LN LOT 81 TH N 51 OEG 21 MIN 04 SEC E 3 FTM/L TO WLY MGN N P RIW TH NWL YALG SO MGN 69 FT TH S 65 DEG50 MIN 45 SEC W 20 FT TH S 50 DEG 55 MIN 04 SEC Legal Description W 36.07 FT TO PT ONMDR LN TH S 50 DEG 55 MIN 04 SECW 47 FT TH S 63 OEG 38 MIN 40 SECW 222.51 FT TO INNER-HARBOR LN" TH S 40 OEG 35 MIN 00 SEC E 65.07 FTTH N 62 DEG 15 MIN 42 SEC E224.02 FT TH S 46 OEG 34 MINOO SEC E 10.82. FT TH N 50 DEG 36 MIN 04 SEC E 50.70 FT TO POB Assessor Residential Building Records: Address 2811 MOUNTAIN VIEWAV N 98055 Building Grade Very Good Building number 1 Cpndition Average. Bedrooms 5 Year Built 1987 Baths 2 Year Renovated 0 112 Baths 0 Total Living SqFt 2870 3/4 Baths 0 1-' 1st Floor SqFt 1710 Stories 1 Half Floor SqFt 1160 Single Story Fireplace 1 2nd Floor SqFt 0 Multi Story Fireplace 1 Upper Floor SqFt 0 Free Standing 1 Fireplace Total Basement SqFt 0 Basement Garage SqFt 0 1---Total Finished Basement 0 Attached Garage SqFt 580 SqFt Finished Basement Grade NONE OR Open Porch SqFt . 160 . UNKNOWN Daylight Basement N I Enclosed Porch SqFt 0 Heat System ForcedAir~ Deck SqFt 680 Heat Source Gas Percent Brick Stone 0 This report was generated: 12/29/2004 12:44:07 PM Related on-line re orts: .... .............. ~.: ........... . : DOES: Permit Applications Report .: . ... : ... :::::::: .. ::::.: .. :.:.:: ...... :.::::.:::::.:.::::.::: ................................................................................................................. :~ .................. . : King County: Districts and Development Conditions Report ........ , 'U~ ·Ki~~·C~~~~·A~·~~~·~~~~:·~·R~~i·p:;~·~~~:·R~·~·~:rt·(PDF:·f~;~~t:~~~~i:~~~·A~~~b~t)v:::::::::::i .':::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::(:: : King County Treasury Operations: Property Tax Information l:fff;::±:~:t!:~~ff~:~~1=~:~ft~,~P~:~~~,::an~~;~;;~~~::;o:~~~~ts:' http://www5 .metrokc.goY/reports/property _report.asp?PIN=3 3421 04029 Page 2 of3 12/29/2004 )EVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION WAIVEk OF SUBMITTAL REQUIR_.JlENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS [/U·)~[:\~M~B:r:16~:&~~~:~0ff~[[~[~)[~~>[.~.[~y[[ml~[[~[ ~[[m~~W!~{l~[~~~)~~)~~::\~~.[:::~§~~~~f#{·)~~:[:/)~[~U~~[H. Parking, Lot Coverage & Landscaping Analysis 4 ~1~~:~~~~~:{p:M1~)'~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::~:::::~::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::~::::::: ::::::~:::::::::::::::::~::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::~:::::::::::::::::::: Postage 4 ~~p'p!j~~j~~:M~~j~9:~~~o/.~~:::::::::::::::::~::::::::::::::::::::: :::::~:::::::::::::::::~::::::: ::::::::::~:::::~:::~:::::::::~: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::~:~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::~:~:::::::::::::::: Public Works Approval Letter2 ~~~~~,!~a~i9~:~W.:~:::::::::::~::::::::::::::::::i::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::~::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::~::::::::::: Screening Detail 4 ~!t#::~!~~:~:~~~::::::~~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::~:::::::::::::::::::: Street Profiles 2 t~~:~~P.8~:#:f.!~~:9~!@'t~:~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::~::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::;::::::::::::::::::::::::: Topography Map3 "\ tf~#i~:~~~~i:~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::~:::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: Tree Cutting/Land Clearing Plan 4 ~ ~f:~ ~¢~~~f:~~!9~~ 9.¥~f:!~Y P~~9~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~~:~:~: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.~ ~ (~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~: ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ > ~ ~ 1/10.& ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I Utilities Plan, Generalized 2 <YJ No <rJt!uJtr -(9& ~ w~i~~~:Mitk~ti~~~~i~F~~4:~~:~:::~~:::::::::::::~::::::::::~:~:::~:~ ~:::~ :~:::::::::::~ :~:~:::::::::~~~:~:::::::::::::: ::::::Nd~::t?if;[jj/~:t:::tJli2$W.~~~ Wetlands Mitigation Plan, Preliminary 4 (7v l --j-fJp ()f-Ltr.ta t3.eA W~~'~~::R.~p~w:r;>~I~~~~~::~:~:~:::~:::::~:~:::::~:::::::::::::::::::::::~ :::::~::::::::: :::::::~:~:~:::::::~:::~:~:::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::~:~::: Wireless: Applicant Agreement Statement 2 AND 3 Inventory of Existing Sites 2AND3 Lease Agreement, Draft 2 AND 3 Map of Existing Site Conditions 2 AND 3 Map of View Area 2 AND 3 Photosimulations 2AND 3 This requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services Section PROJECT NAME: tWfttft ~o..t Urt 2. Public Works Plan Review Section 3. Building Section DATE: ________________________ __ 4. Development Planning Section , Q:\WEB\PW\DEVSERV\Forms\Planning\waiver.xls 01/0612004 --"'-:::.... -------"-.~.---- _EVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION ._ ' WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS 05 013 :H:::/.>0;j:~Ii.i1N.t:~~I~\~0;t:::.:.:·::::::n::j~i~;;::·Y;jij~~;R·Y·y::::::>::>:::::::~e~i~~~:::::::\:\:>::::::U: Calculations 1 ~~§~~~:~:~9:~:~~#.~¥::~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: Construction Mitigation Description 2AND4 :t¥.~~!~Y~f:#'~~¥.~:~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: Drainage Control Plan 2 I ~\ :@.j~~~~:~~i#.6::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::~::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: Elevations, Architectural 3 AND 4 :~~~~~~~(~~~~~ii~~:~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: Existing Covenants (Recorded Copy) 4 :$*i~t!~g:~~~~~~:~~~~f.~~~:¢9P.Y.):f:::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: Flood Hazard Data 4 ~~l . :~!~r::P:~~:~:~~~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::pt 1::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: Geotechnical ReporhAND3 [1../ ~ :$.~~~i~g::~!~~;:¢~~~pt~~(~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :?:s:::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ~rading Plan, Detailed 2 _ fI :H~~l~t:p~~:~~~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::xm1::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: King County Assessor's Map Indicating Site 4 :~n~#'p'in~:fi!~~i::~~~i#~~i:~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :~:::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: Legal Description 4 :4#f8f::~d~!B~::ef.~~:~n~r:~~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::rgiJ::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: Mailing Labels for Property Owners 4 &1J :~~~:8f:)~?CjW.n.~:$.i~:~~~!8#.:~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: Master Application Form 4 :M9~~~#'¢~~~~:~~:P#:iB9n~i!i~~ij:~::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: Neighborhood Detail Map 4 This requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services Section PROJECT NAME: (!pdxH f3atXt Ii-&- 2. Public Works Plan Review Section 3. Building Section 4. Development Planning Section DATE: I/o/as- ; ["', "~ .. :~" {~'.::<\h\'~;' ."~, >: -~·\i. .. l·~:~'>'~·; Q:\WEB\PW\DEVSERWorms\Planning\waiver.xls 01/06/2004 I ..... 1 .• • DATE: p~N'NG oev~~tt,~WeNToN JAN 3' 2005 RECE\VED MEMORANDUM 05 01.3 CITY OF RENTON RECEIVED DEC 082004 BUILDING DIVISION TO: Construction Services, Rre Prevention, Plan Review, EDNSP, Project Planner FROM: Neil Watts, Development Services Division Director SUBJECT: New Preliminary Application: CiJ-rkredt 'BtJ1bflt'ft LOCATION: 'Z~l' U~J, View AtAt-. . PREAPPNO. pg6-01f'-/ClZ- 10 WeLI~lU~ A mee!!.ng with the ~as been scheduled for . aMv , T .... GlR¥. 1.Je-C-. Z-Z. ~ , in 'one of the 6th floor conference rooms (new City Hall). If this meeting is scheduled at 10:00 AM, the MEETING MUST BE CONCLUDED PRIOR TO 11:00 AM to allow time to prepare for the 11:00 AM meeting. Please review the attached project plans prior to the scheduled meeting with the appliCant. You will not need to do a thorough -permit lever review at this time. Note only maJor Issues that must be resolved priorto formal land useandlor building permit application submittal. . Plan Reviewer assigned is ~ • PI b It Ott t t M"~ d J ease su m your wn en com men s 0 A • least two (2) days before the meeting. Thank you. ~~-dnM~~ (Planner) at H:\Division.s\Develop.ser\Dev & PJan.ing\TempJate\Preapp2 Revised 9/00 ' , .. MEMORANDU DATE: TO: Construction Services, Fire Plan Review, EDNSP, Project Planner FROM: Neil Watts, Development Services Division Director SUBJECT: New Preliminary Application: Ci-rkredt 8tJt?zflt:rt LOCATION: -Z~l' lA~n {/lew A~ . . PREAPPNO. PQ6-01f--/Cfz... '0 Wea~a-'1 A mee!!.ng with the a~s been scheduled for II ~ , TJ"'JliI.~ ve-C-~ z., 'Z I ~ ,in 'one of the 6'11 floor conference rooms (new City Hall). If this meetin'g is scheduled at 10:00 AM, the MEETING MUST BE CONCLUDED PRIOR TO 11:00 AM to allow time to prepare for the 11:00 AM meeting. Please review the attached project plans prior to the scheduled meeting with the appliCant. You will not need to do a thorough -pennit lever review. at this time. Note only major Issues that must be resolved prforto fonnalland useandlor building permit application submittal. . Plan Reviewer assigned is _-=:,~:..s...=:......-_____ • H:\Division.s\Develop.ser\Dev &. PJan.ing\Template\Preapp2 Revised 9/00 ' CITY OF RENTON MEMO PUBLIC WORKS TO: FROM: DATE: NancyWeil ~an lilian December 16, 2004 SUBJECT: PREAPPLICATON REVIEW COMMENTS CORBETT BOATLIFT PREAPP NO. 04-142 2811 -Mountain View Ave NOTE ON PRELIMINARY REVIEW COMMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS REPORT: The following comments on development and permitting issues are based on the pre- application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision makers (e.g. Hearing Examiner, Boards of Adjustment, Board of Public Works and City Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by the City or made by the applicant. Plan Review has no comments at this time. CITY OF RENTON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT NEIGHBORHOODS, AND STRATEGIC PLANNING MEMORANDUM DATE: December 14,2004 TO: Nanr:J~eil Rebl~~ FROM: STAFF CONT ACf: Don Erickson SUBJECf: Corbett Boatlift, 2811 Mountain View Ave; PRE 04-142 Summary: The applicant is proposing to remove an existing boatlift and three adjacent pilings and install a new boatlift along the north side of an existing 432-foot long pier. Unlike the existing boatlift that is attached to the pier, the applicant explains that the proposed new boatlift is free standing and sits directly on the lakebed. The existing boatlift is being removed because it is located on the neighboring lot. The new boatlift would provide safer moorage and additional space for storage. The subject site is designated Residential Single Family on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map and zoned R-8. It is also located in an Urban Shoreline Environment and regulated under the City's Shoreline Master Program. Conclusion: Renton's Comprehensive Plan contains no specific policies related to shoreline management so commenting on this application would not be relevant. cc: Don Erickson Document2\cor .... DATE: TO: CITY OF RENTON PlanninglBuildingIPublic Works MEMORANDUM December 22, 2004 Pre-Application File No. 04-142 FROM~ureen Nicolay Senior Planner, 425-430-7294 S~: Corbett BoatIift and Piling Removal General: We have completed a preliminary review of the pre-application for the above- referenced development proposal. The following comments on development and permitting issues are based on the pre-application submittals mad.e to the City of Renton by the applicant and the codes in effect on the date of review. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this sununary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision-makers (e.g., Hearing Examiner, Department of Ecology). Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by City staff or made by the applicant. The applicant is encouraged to review all applicable sections of the Renton Municipal Code. The Development Regulations are available for purchase for $50.00, plus tax, from the Finance Division on the first floor of City Hall. Project Proposal: The subject site is located at 2811 Mountain View Avenue. The property contains a single family residence with a 432 square-foot pier and an existing boatlift station. The proposed project would remove the existing 9' by IS' boat lift and 3 mooring piles and install a new 12' by 18' boat lift along the north side of the pier. The boatlift and pilings to be removed are actually located on the neighboring property and this proposal would relocate the boatlift to within the lot boundaries and bring it into compliance with setback regulations. The boatlift is a freestanding structure that would sit directly on the lakebed. It would not be attached to the existing pier. Two existing mooring piles (not shown on site plan) are located to the north of the pier. These would remain and no changes are proposed to the existing pier. Zoning: The property is located within the Residential-8 dwelling units per acre (R-8) zoning designation. The detached single family residence located on the site is a conforming use in this zone. Sensitive Areas: Shorelines: Because the subject site is located within the 200-foot boundary of Lake Washington, it is regulated by the City's Shoreline Master Program. Lake Washington is designated as "Urban Environment" under the Shoreline regulations. The "Urban" designation permits a variety of uses within the shoreline boundary provided the use complies with the applicable setback established by the Master Program. In the case of a boatlift, however, the Shoreline Regulations are silent regarding the permissibility of the use and applicable development standards. City Permit Requirements: From the City's perspective, the project is composed of two distinct elements: 1) Removal of three existing pilings and the existing boatlift, and 2) Installation of the new boatlift: 1) Removal of three existing pilings and the existing boatlift: No City permit for this work is required, however Environmental Review and a Shoreline Permit Exemption is required. This project would qualify for a Shoreline Permit Exemption because its fair market value is less than $2,500 . ..lfthe piling/boatlift removal were a "stand alone" project, the City would probably not require it to undergo environmental review as it is technically SEPA exempt under WAC 197-11-800(3) and WAC 197-11-800(2f). However, the new boatlift element of the overall project will trigger environmental review for the entire scope of work, including the piling removal. Permits for piling and boatlift removal from other agencies may be required. 2) Installation of the new boatlift: Because the City's Shoreline Master Program does not address boatlifts specifically, the Department of Ecology and the City have previously determined that a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit is required for all new boatlifts. Environmental Review will also be required because there is no exemption for installation of a boatlift. Therefore, boatlift installation would require a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit, Environmental Review ami un ETi!Ctticul-Pe77nit. frtIo $t>U-r /'~ After completion of the environmental review portion of the process, the City's Hearing Examiner would make a recommendation on the Shoreline Conditional Use Permit to the State of Washington Department of Ecology who would have the fmal authority to issue the permit decision. These two land use Permits would be processed as a single land use application and would be completed in an estimated time frame of approximately 16 weeks ."I once a complete application is accepted. This timeframe is inclusive of the necessary review time allotted to the Department of Ecology for the Shoreline Permit after the completion of the City's review, but does not include processing times for any other agency (DFWL, Army Corps) permits. The City's electrical permit and any other agency permits could be issued 21 days after DOE approval of a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit. Conditional Use Permit Evaluation Criteria: RMC Section 4-9-190.1 lists five criteria that the Hearing Examiner is asked to consider: 1. The use must be compatible with other permitted uses within that area. The applicant proposes to have installed one freestanding residential boatlift to the north side of an existing 432 square-foot dock located on Lake Washington. The use of the site is a single-family residence, which is consistent with the adjoining properties. The waterfront along this portion of Lake Washington is currently developed with residential water-related uses. The site already contains a boat lift, however, the City has no record of any permits issued for the existing lift. 2. The use will not interfere with the public use of public shorelines. The proposed residential boatlift will be located near shore abutting an existing residential dock and pier. The 12' by 18' boatlift will need to comply with City of Renton development standards and Building Code requirements. The proposed use is for one watercraft to be maintained at this site, which is along private shoreline. 3. Design of the site will be compatible with the surroundings and the City's Master Program. The proposed 12' by 18' freestanding residential boatlift is located approximately 25 feet off shore .. of the ordinary high water mark. It is approximately IS-feet from the side property line to the south and approximately 25' from the side property line to the north. The City's Shoreline Master Program regulations required a minimum of five feet to an adjacent property line. The structure will be constructed to extend out the end of the existing dock (approximately 52' out from the ordinary high water mark). Additionally, it is compatible with other properties with such -" structures in the surrounding area. The City's Shoreline Master Program (WAC 173-26-230 b) states the design and construction shall avoid or, if that is not possible, shall minimize and mitigate the impacts to ecological functions, and critical areas resources. The proposed residential boatlift is compatible with the objectives and policies of the City's Master Program as an accessory water use to an existing residential use. 4. The use shall be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of City's Master Program. The use is a residential accessory use often associated with single family waterfront residences. While no setbacks are established in the Comprehensive Plan or Development Regulations for boatlifts, in the City of Renton, piers and docks require a 5-foot side yard setback and cannot exceed 80 feet in length. These regulations would not necessarily be applied to a boatlift, however in this instance, the proposed boatlift would comply with the City specifications relative to docks. 5. The use meets the conditional use criteria in WAC 173-27-160. This section states that its purpose is to provide a system within the Master Program, which allows flexibility in the application of use regulations in a manner consistent with the policies ofRCW 90.58.020. In authorizing a conditional use, special conditions may be attached to the permit by local government or the department to prevent undesirable effects of the proposed use and/or to assure consistency ofthe project with the act and the local master program. (A) Uses which are classified or set forth in the application master program as conditional uses may be authorized provided that the applicant demonstrates all the following: i) That the proposed use is consistent with the policies of RCW 90.58.020 and the master program. Lake Washington is classified as a Shoreline of Statewide Significance. The proposed private residential boatlift demonstrates compliance and/or non-applicability to the policies ofRCW 90.58.020 and the master program. ii) That the proposed use will not interfere with the normal public use of public shorelines. The subject site is single-family residential private property on the shores of Lake Washington. No interference with the public use of public shoreline should occur, as the site is not directly adjacent to any public shoreline. iii) That the proposed use of the site and design of the project is compatible with other authorized uses within the area and with uses planned for the area under the comprehensive plan and shoreline master program. The subject site is designated Residential Single-Family on the City's Comprehensive Plan and the proposed use qualifies as an accessory use to the waterfront property. The residential boatlift is compatible in design and use to the adjacent lakefront residential properties and the shoreline mater program as discussed previously. ivY That the proposed use will cause no significant adverse effects to the shoreline environment in which it is to be located. This section of Lake Washington is designated as Urban Environment in the Shoreline Master Program regulations and is a developed shoreline of residential uses. Ifthe boatlift is installed and maintained according to all required state and local permits, the use is not expected to cause significant adverse effect to the shoreline environment. v) That the public interest suffers no substantial detrimental effects. As the site is a private single-family residential use and the intended boatlift is the only watercraft lift proposed on the site at this time, it is not anticipated any detrimental effects will be created of any significance than what currently exist along the shoreline of Lake Washington in this area. ... (B) In the granting of all conditional use permits, consideration shall be given to the cumulative impact of additional requests for like actions in the area. This single-family residential site has an existing 432 square foot dock, which is compatible with the adjacent residential properties. This applicant proposes to relocate an existing lift so as to site it similarly to many of the adjacent properties. A City of Renton Park further to the south of this site does have a boat launch facility. The applicant's request for a residential boatlift should not have an adverse cumulative impact for this area. (C) Other uses which are not classified or setforth in the applicable master program may be authorized as conditional uses provided the applicant can demonstrate consistency with the requirements of this section and the requirements for conditional uses contained in the master program. Residential boatlift is not a use set forth in the Shoreline Master Program thereby requiring a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit. The criteria discussed in this report have indicated the applicant's request is consistent with the requirements. (D) Uses which are specifically prohibited by the master program may not be authorized pursuant to either subsection (A) or (B) of this section. The City's Shoreline Master Program does not specifically prohibit a residential boatlift. Staff Recommendations: Based on the information provided, it appears as though the proposed boatlift location would be an improvement over its current off-site location and that staff would support the necessary Shoreline Conditional Use Permit request as the proposed lift would comply with the setback and length requirement of a dock. The ordinary high water mark of the lake must be clearly identified on the submitted plans, along with the proposed building setbacks from the high water mark. Timing: Agency permits or the City's electrical permit may not be issued until twenty-one (21) days after Conditional Use Permit approval by the Department of Ecology or until any review proceedings initiated within this twenty-one (21) day review period have been completed. City Fees: The application fee would be $2,500.00 for the Conditional Use Permit and associated environmental review (full price for the most expensive fee and half-off all subsequent fees). lileehical ramit tees noah! ee $43J~Q in addition m tins amtJllIlt. City Application Forms: Detailed information regarding the land use application submittal requirements is provided in the attached handouts. Once a Conditional Use Permit is obtained, the applicant must also satisfy any conditions of approval before the other agency permits or City electrical permit can be issued, Likely City Conditions of Permit Approval: 1. Applicant shall obtain all required permits from other agencies (Washington State Department ofFish and Wildlife and the US Corp of Engineers, etc.). 2. The City of Renton owns and operates an 8" diameter sanitary sewer main located in Lake Washington, along the water frontage. fu order to avoid damaging the existing Sewer Line, it is requested that the contractor coordinate the shoreline work with the City of Renton Maintenance personnel (425-430-7279), at least 72 hours prior to beginning construction. 3. The applicant shall comply with all construction conditions by the State agencies and all construction conditions provided in the application and modifications submitted to the City. Permits from Other Agencies: Permits/Approvals from other agencies may also be required. It is the responsibility of the applicant to obtain these other permits/approvals. A Section 10 Permit may be required-Contact: US Army Corps of Engineers Seattle District Regulatory Branch POBox 3755 Seattle, WA 98124-2255 Telephone: (206) 764-3495 Fax: (206) 764-6602 A Hydraulic Permit may be required-Contact: Department ofFish and Wildlife Region No.4 -Northwest 18018 Mill Creek Boulevard Mill Creek, WA 98012 Telephone: (206) 775-1311 Fax: (206) 338-1066 A 401 Water Quality Certification may be required-Contact: Department of Ecology 300 Desmond Drive Lacey, W A 98503 Telephone: (360) 407-6000 An Aquatic Use Permit may be required-Contact: Department of Natural Resources Aquatic Resources Division South Puget Sound Region 28329 Southeast 448th Street POBox 68 Enumclaw, WA 98022 Telephone: (360) 825-1631 H:div/devserv/LNIPRE04-142 City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Re: Project Narrative Location: 2811 Mountain View Drive Renton, WA 98055 Owner: Mr. Rick Corbett Se ~ sec 31 T 24 R 5E Tax ID: 334210-4029 05 013 January 11, 2005 DEVELOPMENT PlANNING CITY OF RENTON JAN 3 f 2005 RECEIVED Square footage (lot) 4300 sq. ft. Pier: 432 Front Footage: 70' House: 2870 Land Use Permits 1. Shoreline Substantial Development 2. SEPA Review 3. Building Permit Zoning R-8 The site is a single family residence (2870 sq. ft) with a 432 square foot pier located on the shoreline of Lake Washington. The site is a medium bank shoreline with good drainage conditions. The proposed work is to remove an existing boat lift station and three mooring piling from their current location along the south side of the pier and install a new free standing boat lift station along the north side of the existing pier. The proposed lift will be placed within the setback requirements set by The City of Renton. This is a solar powered unit requiring no electrical or water lines. The boat lift sits directly on the lake bed and is supported utilizing two foot by two foot pads place in four locations. There will be no pile driving or excavation of soils. Please refer the enclosed details. The projected project cost will be approximately $ 10,000.00 The project will be completed within the timing conditions set by The Department of Fish & Wildlife and Corps of Engineers, July 16 -December 31. The hours will be between 7am and 4pm Monday through Friday. A best management plan will be implemented to minimize any impacts to the surrounding areas. Removal of materials and delivery of the new boat lift will be completed by a barge mounted crane on Lake Washington. Please call us at 206-236-1700 if you need any additional information. Sincerely, , SEABORN. PILE DRIVING COM~Y ;At f~k~ ~f~ Sidebotham City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 .v.. Re: Conditional Use Justification Location: 2811 Mountain View Drive Renton, WA 98055 Owner: Mr. Rick Corbett December 29, 2004 OEVELOPME CITY OF~~~~N/NG JAN 3 1 2005 RECEIVED i. The use must be compatible with other permitted uses within the area. The installation of a free standing boat lift station and personal water craft lift will be compatible with other pe'rmitted uses within the area for the safe storage and moorage a private boat. This installation will meet the setback requirements set by The City of Renton and will comply with all conditions and regulations. This installation is also allowed by The Corps of Engineers and National Marine Fisheries Services under Programmatic Reference Numbers 1-3-001- 1524, 1-3-00-IC-I525 & WSB-00-582. In addition, several of the adjacent properties have similar existing boat lift and jet-ski lift stations .. ii. This use will not interfere with the public use of public shorelines. This site is a private residence and the proposed lifts will be on private property. There will be no interference with public use. iii. Design of the site will be compatible with the surroundings and the City's Master Program. The design of the site will comply with all regulations and conditions required by The City of Renton. It will be in scope with the surrounding permitted uses. iv. The use shall be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the City's Master Program. The use will be in harmony with the City's Master Program and will not be a grant of special privilege. The use will improve the ability of water related activities. It will comply with City specifications relative to docks. v. The use meets the conditional use criteria in WAC 173-27-160. This use meets the criteria outlined in the WAC 173-27-160. .... . City of Renton Developm~nt Services Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Re: Construction Mitigation Description 05 Location: 2811 Mountain View Drive Renton, WA 98055 Owner: Mr. Rick Corbett DEVELOPMENT P CITY OF AENT~%N'NG JAN 3 1 2005 RECEIVED January 6, 2005 The project will be completed within the timing conditions set by The Department of Fish & Wildlife and Corps of Engineers, July 16 -December 31. The hours will be between 7am and 4pm Monday through Friday. A best management plan will be implemented to minimize any impacts to the surrounding areas. Removal of materials and delivery of the new boat lift will be completed by a barge mounted crane on Lake Washington. Please call us at 206-236-1700 if you need,any additional information. Sincerely, SEABORN PILE DRIVI. NG C.OM,YNY , JA),~e~~b--f/7Jifj! Sidebotham CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of Checklist: 05 ~13 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON JAN 3 1 2005 RECEIVED DEVELOPMENT SERVICES lOSS SOUTH GRADY WAY RENTON, WA 98055 (425) 430-7200 Date Received'--_____ _ File No. ________ _ Fee ______ ....,-___ _ The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the City identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the City decide whether an EIS is required Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. The City uses this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own opservations or·project plans without the need to hire experts. !fyou really do not know the answer, .or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later.:. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the City staff can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for non-project proposals: (Applicants for private development Projects should disregard this section.) Complete this checklist for non-project proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply". IN ADDmON, complete the SUPPLEMEJNTAL SHEET FOR NON-PROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For non-project actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project, "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area, respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: 2. Name of applicant: Agent: Seaborn Pile Driving Company 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 9311 SE 3(/h Street STE 204. Mercer Island, WA 98040 JeffSidebotham. 4. Date checklist prepared: 12/29/04 5. Agency requesting checklist: CITY OF RENTON -DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 6. Proposed Timing or Sc~edule (including phasing, if apPlicab~e): l:, I Sometime after receiving appropriate permits, and within designated time restrictions, if any. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. None known 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal: . . This Checklist 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. Yes, Washington State Department of FISheries and U.S. Corps of Engineers. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known: FISheries and Corps Approval 11. . Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific I information on project description.) Remove and dispose of three existing mooring piling and afree standing boat lift. InstaU a new free standing boatlift station in a new location on the property. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a PARCEL NUMBER, STREET ADDRESS, IF ANY, AND SECTION, TOWNSHIP, AND RANGE. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). PROVIDE A LEGAL DESCRIPTION, SITE PLAN, VICINITY MAP, AND TOPOGRAPHIC MAP. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. 2811 Mountain VIeW Avenue, Renton WA 98055 Tax Account # 334210-4029 SE % SEC 31 T 24N R 5E B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS l. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other'--__ _ Flat b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 2% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils specify them and note any prime farmland Gravel, sand, clay d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. None known 'I ' e. Describe the purpose, type and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. None proposed f Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. No g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? None known h. PROPOSED MEASURES TO REDUCE OR CONTROL EROSION, OR OTHER IMPACTS TO THE EARTH, , IF ANY: By complying with regulations 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Standard equipment emissions/or 2 days b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No c. PROPOSED MEASURES TO REDUCE OR CONTROL EMISSIONS OR OTHER IMPACTS TO AIR, IF ANY: Finish job in timely manner to avoid excessive emissions 3. WATER a; StiIface 1. Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream Clr river it flows into. , Lake Washington 2. Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Yes, overwater construction (see plans) 3. Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None 4. Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general descriptions, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. None known 5. Does the proposal lie within a loo-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No 6. Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No J b. Ground 1. Will ground water be withdrawn. or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No 2. Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals ... ; agricultural; etc). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Not applicahle c. Water Runoff (including storm water): ·1. Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include .quantities, ifknown). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Rain water runs off existing dock into lake 2. Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe: No .d. PROPOSED MEASURES TO REDUCE OR CONTROL SURFACE GROUND, AND RUNOFF WATER IMPACTS, IF ANY: Usual care 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen. other c:q::: evergreen tree fir, cedar, pine, other ~shrubs . . :b grass -pasture __ crop or grain __ wet soilplants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk ~cabbage, other _x_water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other _ .. __ other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? None c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None Known d. PROPOSED LANDSCAPING, USE OF NATIVE PLANTS. OR OTHER MEASURES TO PRESERVE OR ENHANCE VEGETATION ON THE SITE, IF ANY: None proposed 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any bird and animal which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: Geese, Ducks ~ mammals, deer, bear, elk, beaver, other:. __ _ fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other:-JPerch ____ ____ b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Chnook Salmon / Bals Eagles c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Not known d. PROPOSED MEASURES TO PRESERVE OR ENHANCE WILDLIFE, IF ANY: Usual care 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood. stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed. project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Diesel fue~ to run equipment b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. WHAT KINDS OF ENERGY CONSERVATION FEATURES ARE INCLUDED IN THE PLANS OF THIS PROPOSAL? LIST OTHER PROPOSED MEASURES TO REDUCE OR CONTROL ENERGY IMPACTS, IF ANY: None proposed 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEAL1H a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe: No 1. Describe special emergency services that might be required: None 2. PROPOSED MEASURES TO REDUCE OR CONTROL ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH HAZARDS, IF ANY: Usual care b. Noise 1. What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None known 2. What types and . level of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Construction, usual work hours (7:30 to 3:30, M-F) 3. PROPOSED MEASURES TO REDUCE OR CONTROL NOISE IMPACTS, IF ANY: Usual care 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE ¥. , a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Residential recreation b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No c. Describe any structures on the site. Residence of owner and private pier d.. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? An existing boat lift and three mooring piles will be removed e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? RIS f ... What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? g. If applicable, what is the current Shoreline Master Program designation of the site? Not applicable h. . Has any part" of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Yes/Lake Washington i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Owner andfamily j Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None 'k. PROPOSED MEASURES TO AVOID OR REDUCE DISPLACEMENT IMPACTS, IF ANY: Usual cai'e . J. PROPOSED MEASURES TO ENSURE THE PROPOSAL IS COMPATIBLE WITH EXISTING AND PROJECTED LAND USES AND PLANS, IF ANY: By complying with regulations 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any. Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Not applicable b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing.· Not applicable c. PROPOSED MEASURES TO REDUCE OR CONTROL HOUSING IMPACTS, IF ANY: Not applicable 10. AESTHETICS ,a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? OHW+2' b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c.PROPOSED MEASURES TO REDUCE OR CONTROL AESTHETIC IMPACTS, IF ANY: Usual care 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day\vould it mainly occur? None b. Could light or glare from the fmished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None known d. PROPOSED MEASURES TO REDUCE OR CONTROL LIGHT AND GLARE IMPACTS, IF ANY: Usual care 12. RECREATION a What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Water relilled activities : b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. None known c. PROPOSED MEASURES TO REDUCE OR CONTROL IMPACTS ON RECREATION, INCLUDING RECREATION OPPORTUNITIES TO BE PROVIDED BY THE PROIECT OR APPLICANT, IF ANY: Usual care . 13 .. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION. a. Are there any places or objects Listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. None known b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None known c. ANY MEASURES TO REDUCE OR CONTROL IMPACTS, IF ANY: Usual care 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highway's serving the site, and describe proposed access for the existing street . system. Show on site planS, ifany. ( Mountain View Avenue and private driveway") h. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes JI4mile c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? None d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or Improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveway? If so, generally describe (indicate whether Public or private). No e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. Yes, close to local roads and over Lake Washington. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Not applicahle g. PROPOSED MEASURES TO REDUCE OR CONTROL TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS, IF ANY: Usual care 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public Services (for example: fire protection, police' protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No b. PROPOSED MEASURES TO REDUCE OR CONTROL DIRECT IMPACTS ON PUBLIC SERVICES, IF ANY: Usual care 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. None Known C. SIGNATURE , The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Si-;fh~ Date Sub~itt : City Of Renton Environmental Checklist Seaborn Pile Driving Co. Seattle Wa Fonn No. 4A 6/97 ~ ·r" OEVELOPMEt-lT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON JAN 3 1 2005 RECEIVED "1 \ ~ \ > 1 £) ,,- ~ 1 ~. I.1J ---~.-- 05 013 o \ \ ~ @ ~ , \ ~?! 6/'1:-- ?J {ys:V ~'6r> "1 ~ Q \J;J ..:J ~ \ 4l £) y V' ~ ;:r I)) -' 0 ()' <= -;i. y-o 1/\ 1-\ll tf~ 0 . -~ n ~ uJ , "7 0 ot 0-U . - vJ ~ ~ :::s 0.-V" cJ ~ oj (J P- "'l'"" 0 , -D ( ~ r1 . -.< ..> ~ " ~J ll.t1 -I r~ ~ 6' OJ-t:P ~G"" ~ . -j:.-4 J~j. ~~~ ~o~ {.o ;i.:-~ "o~ rrPcJ. .n ..,....,. .,-.,J V\ ~ ;z. ~ (> -./ ~ fJ, c o.l ~ n &'7 Account Number \' .ff Legal Description Assessor legal Description Records: 334210402908 1 Record Number 101 -05 79-80-81 AHILLMANS LK WN GARDEN OF EDEN # 1POR OF LOTS & 2ND CL SH LOS ADJBEG NXN MQR LN WITH S LN LOT 81 TH N 51 DEG 21 MIN 04 SEC E 32 FTM/L TO WL Y MGN N P RIW TH NWLYALG SO MGN 69 FT TH S 65 DEG50 MIN 45 SEC W 20 FT TH S 50 DEG 55 MIN 04 SEC W 36.07 FT TO PT ONMDR LN TH S 50 DEG 55 MIN 04 SECW 47 FT TH S 63 DEG 38 MIN 40 SECW 222.51 FT TO INNER-HARBOR LN TH S 40 DEG 35 MIN 00 SEC E 65.07 FTIH N 62 DEG 15 MIN 42 SEC E224.02 FT TH S 46 DEG 34 MINOO SEC E 10.82 FT TH N 50 DEG 36 MIN 04 SEC E 50.70 FT TO POB ___ .,......a ____ ... ~ ...................... &'o_ .................. #· ......................... -.. .... ':-' W .-J I-~ W U1 VICINITY MAP INO SCALE LEGAL DESCRIPTlON KENMORE JUANITA BELLEVUE RENTON VICINITY MAP NO SCALE PURPOSE: SA~c ffio~'R.-Aq~ ~() 'R. ~~\~~\~ ~'f·i\l::.e.C'Q .. l~ ~T DATUM: C.O.E. 0.0' E::iT. 1919 ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: SEE SHEET # JOB NAME: ~\<:,.; c..o~ ... :~~\,\ MAIL ADD: ~8\\ N\QI.\.l.'i\'t\\Y~\~ ~ .. . R\::.)..\\o",,\l'\y\~q8os-5' SITE ADD: :)~'fI\c.. : ~'€:. ""\)\I~ 3 ~\\E.'; ~~'O 'f\ ~() ~ L\S;, -1-\..\. '> \' A\\ 'A ~'C.~\. 'eO'f\\ L<~·' .. IN: LAKE WASHINGTON AT:~~\)~ COUNTY OF: KING STATE: WASHINGTON APPL. BY: R.\c..¥... c..o~.:e~\\' PAGE: OF DATE: I L-~- '~O~\ L~~\ \)~-:~ ~\~ ~\\:)~ "\l:-~ ~Lt:..\r,~\~ol-l =, • 8(..\~~ \0 ~1A1>p0R.l. "B. t:. ~ \t(\ 0 S\ "00 ~\ I~-i \)~ 91 \A l.\ c. c.'t (I ~ '0 '!:-~-=--~ ----fPIIIlf"- J:\O:SI.\:,\""!>L~ Lt.-S A~~ l\oa\ V~ q' -' -1/,;"" Il :,\-=-tl.:-I\ ::-\ ( __ ...-0:-:-::_11' 11- -l =-n.7I'~ .. ------s-_~s::_r::-.-;-.Il .: It ,;-1\-! 1.. A-~:e..: e ~ -SL l'o. LE-1. "'.::-b IL -:= \ll -( , , \ ' , , 01 1..3~S"b 'Po \).l-':' 2.. ~lI.c.. B4~~~"'~ 'B.~ ~'tt\ 5··W"0 \t\ 'N \it\ :SoL.l'\~ ~{\~'t.LL. ~-(p I:LA U lie -. -sof'(L ~ I F f:z. F r -.;t-p,J D frJG 01~ crJ LA f ~ ~ F b (j rJE f G 0 Pi f b 0 ~ rCc! .~~ b ~ ) , , rU~\~.!)E.. ~ ~R\~1\\E. ~o1\\ t(\otJ«;t1\~i:.. ~ 'S.\I)~fi~E.. ~~\~VV\ ~ COf.~ ~\.gS f:.'». \~\~ At):s"-P~O~E:.~\\.{ O"N.\.\e.f(S . \) -l.} p~~c-\\\\~~ ~SOl ~tM.~fI\\-\ \\\'f.IN ~\) 'K'e-~II-..\ i"" ..... '\ ~o s ~ ;~o~o~w,~ 1:. ~'>\~lL· \1 'a>~~\ \...\~\ ~\f\\\~~ 1:. ~ ~ L?t ~ t2. ~ 'f.\'> \\ \ "'\G.1\')·~ ~ r ; ~~~ \o't-\ c...ou,,'t-\l'{ ~ K.\~~ A~~~\c..~\.\T: ~\(..~ c..{)~'B~\T t) ~ .-\1.-0';) · . ;. . '-. ,,' .: .. ,., .. ---~--=-===================================:=:::=::=:::=:===========:: j ~j}) ~~\.ll\c.. C,\ l, \--\ 'b ~IL.':> l:;;O\:e.. l..,t..\'\~(.\ , --. _-- -..... _--.- --- -- -- .-- --. ", --- 4 J J CDR , .......... _ . ..... _ .... ...... -..... --- ; £-.-_ ... .l ... R~8 : i . . Z ' ":;';'" j ,. ., .!; "'~:l;'i I l t; : i ; i i ! i!: 11;: ! ; : R' i@' .. ··_·R .. -S .. ··;-; .. W· ";"'-'3~' ';'0" ;..--p .. ·1··_··:.... _ .. _.r, --.. _. . ,-,; : r ; .! '-; tJ...)tr.;~; . ~ : ~ ~~.; 'f ;-, i i : ! :; : : j ;: :;:. i, , ........ . . .. : '. • ..• .. ! I I ., ; : ; : i : : ! 1 r . -I., jR!~ I 1-.J~1.,M.A.·_R_r-_8....:......i '-----.:...--..;...,;O""'O"-_~ ............. '...:......1 ~ .. e._ ... _ ...... __ _ ! !R -18 1 , ~ i !,'!: i ! j i 'i iii i 1 R 8 ;; ; I I ... ~_ .. J-.L!--~N;·i --!~'3" '2" n~ l.d~, .. lS· 0 r: ~.~ .. +.:-.i::·;--l • -'- !'R-' 8' ',' . R 8 r ~ i . ~ I l : : : ; oq . . . t •••• ! '; ~ i -::.j t:~.: iJiir;~ ! ~ :IF • :o.! I;~ I !:JI t! I l IR+8' I -00" . ! ! f-I-. ~ ( ! JR-8i , , , i , . . , t R~8 i , ,.at I I I I : I , -~ .. [ I Rt81 I I I I I , ZONING --00 [ RTS J .-,tIL>=:==;:·~·=:· ~'=~~l &.L. I R' ~8' i I .; t PIBIPW TBCHNICAL SERVICES 11.104103 , , , , i . , , , R~8 , I ; , i ! i ! , , i ; i ~ I ! i ~ I ! ,. : ,....' , ! i ! :a. j , i , , ! I iR i8 i ~ i y+~ ! !U ' , , I ; ! i Llf i Li , , , ! ! :~ . , , ; 1 I j i i ! ; I i , , . I , , j il'III;: j" ',' ". I I ' ; ; I ,! j J : ; R 18 ; ! ; R ! 8 IN-! BGith' sifFr i , I .. 1 -. -~: :....:, :": ~r··';'! ""[-1;; lO 1 i ! I! ! i: i I il: I~ , Ii' ; I ' : i : ',' ,i on ~O --R i : ~ i ! : r ~ i 1 i : . : , .' ,: : t , • l;: :, ,I' .... , ;l~·, -fNI1,-12F)th .. ~1-St-TL. r--l"· , ! : : !' i'" . . . I' ; R~8 : . ~! ! I I : i: ~ f : + R-8 , . ! i I I i ~ I : , ! i i I j ! I A hi'! i ! i 1 , , -:,. ~ '~,: ! , i , I , i j I J.~ ! '? P !~.~li ' l' I R~8 ! • L I ; ! , ! ! i : I I I • • : , , 1 ! I • . , ! : , - - - -Ronton dUy IJmt~ J -' CDR " . " .' " . ... ' , , , , . , , , , , , . , /4Q~th' St • • --- --- ; ._ ........ --j------. , -N' i·-.. ·~·~l~'· i l~t'li l~i ·tr--T--'-~.-.... , 4 ' .. • t.. ,. . : ~ f~::!:!; . . I· : .. • 0 .. t.-~_j ; : ;.-.--. __ . : : I t-.--. i ........... ------_.-... ': t . ...--J L ___ . , ; ~ i .. --~ ! ---•• __ • .,. ••• 4 • .. .... ---[--~ '::~:B-f==~' ,------.--... ~.,: ~! ,:-.. _---.-.. -~. I j .' 1.' 1 . i ., J ' _ ......... _-._--, ! t t '"_._. __ . --Nl'-3~2tid ! St~-. "~...... . , 1 I , . ~ i ; /1 . ! 1 ~o,., _ ... -. . ~ I ~--r-.-i -----R: -'--&3' -f---: [ ! .! : eel !-------..:. --......----~ 1 I 1 i I ; . j cc !C~ " " ." /- y ( 290 "'yo 1:.4.800 F '. , 0 , , \ , -.( • . --.... --. o \ , J • , , ... ~-• • i .;\ I . " ... ... ! G--, . , I . :/ :. • C3 C": ...., CO ll~ 0 , I 31 T24N R5E E 1/2 5431 c.? Z Z l;9 0 ZZ :5f2 = w n.Z '"" > f-W iIi Za: """' wu.. U ::;:0 :z ~~ « w ....J--, a:: wU > w 0 , ~o~ L",~\ \) '\:.,~ ~\~ ~\'OE-'-J\~~ ELt:."t,,",\~t;)>>' J • • \~"") ~~'P\ u. L$. -----• . .. . .~ Bl.\~'(~ \0 ~~?POR.l. ~ 1:. (\ Vi' 0 ~ "'00 \1-\ t.'{ (\\.\. '0 ~ ~...::...~ ____ ~~ .S" ~~~~~~~~~~~~~I~ RO~~~~e~L~~ I . q' , • • • -===---. ~ , . ~ • . . . . • J~ • • • . . 8 1-+ - • ~ . . (I C 'f-r'(..i.. 13e'D ~\.~ \'l : ~l ~ tl P b. 0' po oS ~ P 11 f ~ . • .. . .. • • ~1D 1:-4 (J i ic -.. rf1L f I F ~ F ~ .~-p r1 D frlG GI1ScrJ LA~~~F·b (/,.J~fc.0R:Fb O~ reol F~ ~ J' , , . . . . . .. --.. A~ \:) ~ 00\ V~!) Po \k\ ~ 2.. Vl\c. 'N \\~ "$oLt\~ ?,{\~1(.LL " 1. • ... • . - • . . .--.0 -. 13 St'\ S -H . , . • · . • • • M -C _ tn o . . . . • • ru~~.sE.. ~ ~~\"?t\~ ""801\\ \'(\ooQ..f\~~~ 'S\M\.f'H,~E.. ~~\~VV\ :.COE .. ~,.gs f;.S\, \~\~ ;~O?O3.~~ T\-\~\~1..l.·F\ 10~~\ \-\~\ ,.\~\\~~. 1:.l--\.: L ~ \<.. f'::' ~ ~-;. '" \ "'\ G..\\;.~ 'R$'!". P~O"?t:.~\\.1 O'+\.\-\E.f(S · \ ~ ..\) p\{\\C-'O?I~- -- ~ so, ~tJ"'" ~\ ft \~ \\ \~~ '\\\.l w ~'e.~~~ ("'\~ . q ~o 5 ~ ~\ ~ ~~'" \O~· • c-ou..~1'l ~ K\~~ A~~"\c..~\-.\\! ~\~'"' CDQ..t;~\T ~ 1-\l.-o~ • I I i , I I I I I ! . , \ . ~ ~ _____ ~>W ___ ....... ". ___ ._. _ ..................... -•• -~-~ ........ + ..... -•• -• -.-.... ---.. ..... • ,~-.... -.-. ••• "---_. __ '--' ___ "., •• ' ... , ••• ' .. <1_ .... .,.......... • .,1 ..... ,',.. .~ .... _ .• ,~ .•• ". ~ .. , .•••..• ~ .... _ ....... " •.•• , ..... t •• ~ ...... ~_ ... ___ • __ ....... -_._"._._._ .. _ ..... ,, _____ ..... __ • __ ~_ ... __ .. __ . '1~<---5r ?P-o~~">~£> L,"" . ' . ...... '. ~oc..~ . t?tAh."'\:t~ ~ • , , • I • , , -p. ~~. Rt.~\ ~ ~,,\.Gr_ .lS . . b~\~\. Ro~\<" ~l.\L"-" e~O .s\~~ .l..CO \\. h"\ ()4~ ,,\~ Vt~'M r\ ~c""\.\O~ ,~~. '\CO{)~ P~Cf(o~cO "-\.~~ -So t\\ .~\<;, ~\'A-\ \C~\ .D"~ • en. .... Wi q ~L\~,?OS~: ?~\\l1\n: l3.()~\ tJ\()\1RfrG.iC.? --;.\o~V\~~ b?t,\\,\VV\t c..O~ .l.\.g~'~ ~$1. ,ql<'l F\b3". "?~O~~\'~ C)'~~~~S ,~ ~\,aS A\ I~ . " ... t 1" • • ~L~\-.~ ~~:: 40" . . (' [' i \ , o \ ~ .).0· 3t)" ~'O . 05-013SM 5 At-III U U£ ' .... ' ..... N' o. F ,', c.-H ~ O';>i:,.'Q: ~l:...rt\O't~ "'~t-~j.\'" f\ol.~\ 0 <:"0 O~"l' ~ f\\E) t "Bo~\ L'\~\'-1:l'\'S.\ ~LL A~E.\14 &~\ l\l\1 1..~~ L~~~~~~\\\~(.\\O~· \\\\ R.~\.\\O~ . (C>t.\\t\\,\ ~ ~,~(\ DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON JAN 3 1 2005 RECEIVED_ i1~r.l\C'Pt~\; R\L~ '"'O~~ ~ TI I J... a n tv\ov. '1>,),,'\ -f'I \'-\ 'l \ 'C.,-.)..\ f\ \\. b ~'i:.: I,J. -b -I.) <j ~<t,,"Q).) l~\'i\· ~ ~o% ~~~~ 1 ________________________________________ 4~ ____ '_W ___ ~ ___ .~~---.--------------~--______________ ~~ ______ __* • , I 05 013