The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA-05-025') ",' J,. Proposed Anthone ' Annexation Neighborhood Detail Map o 200 400 ~!~~j 1 : 2400 e Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning • ~. Alex Pietsch. Administrator ~ G. Del Rosario "1: 28 December 2004 - - -City Limits c:::==J Proposed Annex Area C=:J Proposed Expanded Annex Area STA TE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING } AFFIDA VIT OF PUBLICATION PUBLIC NOTICE lody Barton, being first duly sworn on oath that she is a Legal Advertising Representative of the King County Journal a daily newspaper, which newspaper is a legal newspaper of general 'circu~ation and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continuously as a daily newspaper in King County, Washington. The King County 10urnal has been approved as a Legal Newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. The notice in·the exact form annexed was published in regular issues of the King County 10urnal (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a Public Notice was published on April 11, 2005. The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum ~~ \,\\\ \I \ 111/ f (11// , ~ 0 ~ :$:-'''~'' ~:.~~~G~///'l Legal Advertising Representative, King County 10urnal ~ L 0 "'~\S5ion ~;"" ~A\ ~ ....... ' ...... .s-"-,0 • -r .....-S~Ubscribed an/k--d sworn to me this lith day of April, 2005. g ('00 ~OT:~'t'~"' .. \ ~ ~ ~\. PUBL\() /~ g ~ -y '. -t, c\"' .' " ~ "/' ;-~ ••• 4r 2 2() •• ' (} ~ Tom A. Meagher %/. o~··;;/"S:..r..\~ ,,~ Notary Public for the State of Washington, Residing in Redmond, Wl.l.sninfl~n\\'\\\\ P.O. Number: Cost of publishing this notice includes an affidavit surcharge. NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee has issued a Detennination of Non-Significance for the following project under the author- ity of the Renton Municipal Code. Anthone Annexation & Vicinity Prezone LUA05-025, A, RZ, ECF Location: South at the City boundary at S 55th Street & east of the City boundary at Talbot Road S. The _ applicant has requested. Environmental Review for the proposed rezoning of the 4.84-acre annexation site (excluding streets) from King County's R-6 zone. In addition, the City has asked the Boundary Review Board to invoke jurisdiction to include the sur- rounding acres in the annexation for a total of 25.7 acres (21.2-acres excluding street right-of-way). It is proposed that the zoning of the property be R-4 or R-8 to cor- respond with the designation in the Renton Comprehensive Plan. Appeals of the environmental detennination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on April 25, 2005. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional infor- mation regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. Published in the King County Journal April 11, 2005. #858807 , 1". -, CITY OF RENTON PLANNING / BUILDING / PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM Date: September 13, 2005 To: City Clerk's Office From: Stacy M. Tucker Subject: Land Use File Closeout Please complete the following information to facilitate project closeout and indexing by the City Clerk's Office Project Name: Anthone Annexation & Vicinity Prezone LUA (file) Number: LUA-Os-02s,A, PZ, ECF Cross-References: AKA's: Project Manager: Don Erickson Acceptance Date: March 14, 2005 Applicant: City of Renton Owner: City of Renton Contact: Don Erickson, EDNSP -City of Renton PID Number: See A+'o.checl ERC Approval Date: AprilS, 2005 ERC Appeal Date: April 25, 2005 Administrative Denial: Appeal Period Ends: Public Hearing Date: Date Appealed to HEX: By Whom: H EX Decision: Date: Date Appealed to Council: By Whom: Council Decision: Date: Mylar Recording Number: Project Description: The applicants for the Anthone Annexation have requested that the City prezone the subject 4.S4-acre site in advance of annexation, pursuant to RCW 3sA.14.330, so that zoning will be in place at the time the subject site comes into the City. City of Renton will ask the Boundary Review Board to invoke jurisdiction and annex an expanded area for a total of 25.7 acres. The City is proposing R-4 and R-S zoning for the site, consistent with the current Residential Single Family and Residential Low Density land use deSignation shown on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. The proposed prezone is considered to be a non-project action under SEPA. Location: South of the City boundary at S 55th St & east of the city boundary at Talbot Rd S Comments: City of r on Department of Planning / Building / Public rks EN,VIRONMEN TA L & b.t: VEL OPMENT A PPL leA TION RE VI E W SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ~ COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 28, 2005 APPLICATION NO: LUA05-025, A, PZ, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 142M!> APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT MANAG~ J?:::::-'). PROJECT TITLE: Anthone Annexation & Vicinity Prezone PLAN REVIEW: Jen~<>, "","t.ilglKayren Kitt~ick ,. SITE AREA: 21.2 acres BUILDING AREA (Qross): N/A LOCATION: S of S 56th Street & E of Talbot Road I WORK ORDER NO: 77392 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicants for the Anthone Annexation have requested that the City prezone the subject 4.84-acre site in advance of annexation, pursuant to RCW 35A.14.330, so that zoning will be in place at the time the subject site comes into the City. City of Renton will ask the Boundary Review Board to invoke jurisdiction and annex an expanded area for a total of 25.7 acres. The,City.is.proposingJ:l-4.and R,S zoningfor.the site"consistent with the current Residential Single FamUy,and.Hesidential Low Density land use designation shown on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. The proposed prezone is considered to be a non- project action under SEPA. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housina Air Aesthetics Water LightIGlare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energyl HistoriclCultural Natural Resources Preservation AilpOrt Environment 10,000 Feet 14 000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additiona 'nformation is needed to properly assess this proposal. Date Agencies See Attached Don Erickson -City of Renton Owner/Contact Lori Olson Party of Record John & Mary Adams Party of Record (Signature of Sender):7~ ~ STATE OF WASHINGTON ) . ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I kn'ow or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy Tucker signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: 5/-;;rfOS- Notary (Print): /k:Ln~/\. /? 11 ie-->(ar. My appointment expires: 3 -(1 ---0 £, Anthone Annexation & Vicinity Prezone LUA05-025, A, RZ, ECF template -affidavit of service by mailing AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING (ERe DETERMINATIONS) Dept. of Ecology" WDFW • Stewart Reinbold" Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. " Environmental Review Section c/o Department of Ecology Attn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer PO Box 47703 3190 160th Ave SE 39015 -172nd Avenue SE Olympia, WA 98504·7703 Bellevue, WA 98008 Auburn, WA 98092 WSDOT Northwest Region" Duwamish Tribal Office" Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program" Attn: Ramin Pazooki 4717 W Marginal Way SW Attn: Ms Melissa Calvert King Area Dev. Serv., MS·240 Seattle, WA 98106·1514 39015 172nd Avenue SE PO Box 330310 Auburn, WA 98092·9763 Seattle, WA 98133·9710 US Army Corp. of Engineers" KC Wastewater Treatment Division" Office of Archaeology & Historic Seattle District Office Environmental Planning Supervisor Preservation" Attn: SEPA Reviewer Ms. Shirley Marroquin Attn: Stephanie Kramer PO Box C·3755 201 S. Jackson ST, MS KSC·NR·050 PO Box 48343 Seattle, WA 98124 Seattle, WA 98104·3855 Olympia, W A 98504·8343 Jamey Taylor" Depart. of Natural Resources PO Box 47015 Olympia, WA 98504·7015 KC Dev. & Environmental Servo City of Newcastle City of Kent Attn: SEPA Section Attn: Mr. Micheal E. Nicholson Attn: Mr. Fred Satterstrom, AICP 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Director of Community Development Acting Community Dev. Director Renton, WA 98055·1219 13020 SE 72nd Place 220 Fourth Avenue South Newcastle, WA 98059 Kent, WA 98032·5895 Metro Transit Puget Sound Energy City of Tukwila Senior Environmental Planner Municipal Liason Manager Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official Gary Kriedt Joe Jainga 6300 Southcenter Blvd. 201 South Jackson Street KSC·TR·0431 PO Box 90868, MS: XRD·01W Tukwila, WA 98188 Seattle, WA 98104·3856 Bellevue, WA 98009·0868 Seattle Public Utilities Real Estate Services Title Examiner 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 PO Box 34018 Sealtle,WA §}8124·4018 ---------- Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS", the marked agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy of the checklist, PMT's, and the notice of application. " Also note, do not mail Jamey Taylor any of the notices she gets hers from the web. Only send her the ERC Determination paperwork. ;' ... template· affidavit of service by mailing '.1 ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: Anthone Annexation" Vicinity Prezone PROJECT NUMBER: LUA0Il-025, A, Rz, ECF LOCATION: South at tho Clly boundary at S 65th Str .. t " ... t 01 tho City boundary at Talbot Road S. DESCRIPTION: The applicant hal raquastad Environmental Review for the proposed rezoning of the 4.84-acre annexation alte (excluding .treeta) from King County'. R·6 zone. In addition, the City has 8akad 1ha Boundary Review Board to Invoka Jurisdiction to Include the surrounding acrea In the annexation for B total 01 25.7 Icres (21.200acrea excluding atreet rlght-of.-way). It I, proposed that the zoning of the property be R·4 or R.e to corTe.pond wrth the designation In the Renton Comprehensive Plan. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITIEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appaals 0' the environmental determination mUlt ba flied In writing on or before 5:00 PM on April 25. 2005. Appeals mUlt be flied In writing together with the required $75.00 eppllcatlon feo with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeall to the Examiner ara governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-a.110.B. AddJlJonal Information regarding the appaal proc.s. may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk'. Olllce, (425) 431).6510. IFTHE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED, A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE SET AND ALL PARTIES NOTIFIED. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT (425) 430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION 1'1,;iiiie:lnclude t~e:proJect'NUMBER whencalllng.lor proper. file Identification. CERTIFICA TION C0\t'\\(h~ ,hereby certify that 'S were posted by me in ~ conspicuous places or nearby the described property on copies of the above document SIGNED:,_~_'-_7 _t4_"_. _____ ~~,.,... ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of se~ IY'A: ,on the 2---day of ..1Il4:J 2 0aC . NOTARY PUBLIC SIG ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: Anthone Annexation & Vicinity Prezone PROJECT NUMBER: LUA05-025, A, RZ, ECF LOCATION: South at the City boundary at S 55th Street & east of the City boundary at Talbot Road S. DESCRIPTION: The applicant has requested Environmental Review for the proposed rezoning of the 4.84-acre annexation site (excluding streets) from King County's R-6 zone. In addition, the City has asked the Boundary Review Board to Invoke Jurisdiction to Include the surrounding acres In the annexation for a total of 25.7 acres (21.2-acres excluding street right-of-way). It Is proposed that the zoning of the property be R-4 or R-8 to correspond with the designation In the Renton Comprehensive Plan. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals ofthe environmental determination must be flied In writing on or before 5:00 PM on April 25, 2005. Appeals must be flied In writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional Information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED, A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE SET AND ALL PARTIES NOTIFIED. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT (425) 430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE APPLICATION NUMBER: LUA05-025, A, RZ, ECF APPLICANT: Laurance Anthone PROJECT NAME: Anthone Annexation and Vicinity Prezone DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested Environmental Review for the proposed rezoning of the 4.84-acre annexation site (excluding streets) from King County's R-6 zone. In addition, the City has asked the Boundary Review Board to invoke jurisdiction to include the surrounding acres in the annexation for a total of 25.7 acres (21.2-acres excluding street right-of-way). It is proposed that the zoning of the property be split between R-4 and R-8 to correspond with Low Density Residential (LDR) and Residential Single Family (RS) designation in the Renton Comprehensive Plan. / LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: LEAD AGENCY: South of the city boundary at S 55th Street and east of the city boundary at Talbot Road S. City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section This Determination of Non-Significance is issued under WAC 197-11-340. Because other agencies of jurisdiction may be involved, the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fourteen (14) days. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on April 25, 2005. "Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: DATE OF DECISION: SIGNATURES: April 11, 2005 " April 5, 2005 DATE'+k/OC; To: From: Gregg Zimmerman, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator Dennis Culp, Community Services Administrator Lee Wheeler, Fire Chief Jennifer Henning, Development Planning Ih~~~~~~~~~~~ Agenda listed below. Anthone Annexation and Vicinity Prezone (Erickson) LUAOS-025, A, RZ, ECF The applicant has requested Environmental Review for the proposed rezoning of the 4.84-acre annexation site (excluding streets) from King County's R-6 zone. In addition, the City has asked the Boundary Review Board to invoke jurisdiction to include the surrounding acres In the annexation for a total of 25.7 acres (21.2-acres excluding street right-of-way). It is proposed that the zoning of the property be split between R-4 and R-8 to correspond with Low Density Residential (LOR) and Residential Single Family (RS) designation in the Renton Comprehensive Plan. Request for Park Mitigation Credit -Windstone. Windstone II. Windstone III. and Windstone IV (Henning) _ The developer of Windstone has requested credit against the City's required Parks Mitigation Fee for on-site recreation facilities. The plat of Windstone was originally submitted, reviewed and approved by King County in 2000/2001, and subsequently annexed into the City of Renton in April 2004. The project is currently under construction. An on-site private park was required by King County, and the developer has included this in the plat. cc: K. Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor J. Covington, Chief Administrative Officer A. Pietsch, EDNSP Administrator ® B. Wolters, EDNSP Director ® J. Gray, Fire Prevention N. Watts, P/B/PW Development Services Director-® F. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner S. Engler, Fire Prevention ® J. Medzegian, Council S. Meyer, P/B/PW Transportation Systems Director R. Lind, Economic Development L. Warren, City Attorney ® STAFF REPORT City of Renton Department of Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE A. BACKGROUND ERC MEETING DATE Project Name Applicant File Number Project Manager Project Description Project Location Exist. Bldg. Area gsf Site Area SITE MAP See below. Project Location Map April 5, 2005 Anthone Annexation and Vicinity Prezone Laurance Anthone LUA 05-025, A, RZ, ECF Don Erickson The applicant has requested Environmental Review for the proposed rezoning of the 4.S4-acre annexation site (excluding streets) from King County's R-6 zone. In addition, the City has asked the Boundary Review Board to invoke jurisdiction to include the surrounding acres in the annexation for a total of 25.7 acres (21.2-acres excluding street right-of-way). It is proposed that the zoning of the property be split between R-4 and R-S to correspond with Low Density Residential (LOR) and Residential Single Family (RS) designations in the Renton Comprehensive Plan. Because annexations are SEPA exempt (RCW 43.21 C.222) this environmental review is only for the rezone. The majority of the land subject to rezone has already been fully developed as part of three County-approved plats. There are currently 59 dwelling units in the expanded annexation area, with a development potential of a total of .:!:. 75 units under Renton's proposed zoning. The proposed rezone is consistent with Renton's Residential Low Denisty and Residential Single Family land use designation, as shown on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. The site is located south of the city boundary at S. 55th Street and east of the city boundary at Talbot Rd. S. It is located in the NE 1/4 of Section 6, Township 22 N, Range 5E. N/A Proposed New Bldg. Area gsf N/A 21.2 acres Total Building Area gsf N/A ERe Report.doc C,ity of Renton EDNSP Department ANTHONE ANNEXATION AND VICINIT. .EZONE REPORT AND DECISION OF APRIL 5, 2005 ERe Report.doc Env' "mental Review Committee StafJReport LUA-05-025 A, RZ, ECF Page2of3 City of Renton EDNSP Department ANTHONE ANNEXATION AND VICINIT. REPORT AND DECISION OF APRIL 5, 2005 B. RECOMMENDATION EZONE Env· ?lenta/ Review Committee Staff Report LUA-05-025 A, RZ, ECF Page3of3 Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: C. x DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Issue DNS with 14 day APpeal Period. Issue DNS with 15 day Comment Period with Concurrent 14 day Appeal Period. MITIGATION MEASURES Nonerequired for this non-project action. D. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGA TED. Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period with Concurrent 14 da A eal Period. Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period followed by a 14 day Appeal Period. In compliance with RCW -43.21 C. 240, the following non-project environmental review addresses only those Impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development . standards and environmental regulations. 1. Transportation Impacts: None identified for this non-project legislative action. At the most likely scenario for build-out 75 potential dwellings could potentially create 750 average vehicle trip ends per week day. There are currently 59 dwellings which create 590 average vehicle trip ends per week day. Spread out over a number of hours throughout the day this potential number of trips is not anticipated to have a significant adverse impact on the surrounding area. However, mitigation can be provided at the ti(Tle there are specific project proposals before the City. Mitigation Measures: Impacts, if any, are better assessed at the project level. Nexus: Not applicable. E. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS The proposal has been circulated to City Departmental/Divisional Reviewers for their review. Where applicable, these. comments have been incorporated Into the text of this report as Mitigation Measures and/or Notes to Applicant. ~ Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. __ Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. Environmental Determination Appeal Process Appeals of the ·environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM, April 25, 2005. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8":110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. ERe Report.doc City of n Department of Planning / Building / Publi s t ~ ENVIRONMENTAL & VELOPMENT APPLICAT N REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: rJ 1;:' -'I, COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 28, 20 5 c t:iij~v APPLICATION NO: LUA05-025, A, PZ, ECF APPLICANT: Cit of Renton PROJECT TITLE: Anthone Annexation & Vicini Prezone SITE AREA: 21.2 acres BUILDING AREA ross: N/A LOCATION: S of S 56th Street & E of Talbot Road I WORK ORDER NO: 77392 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicants for the Anthone Annexation have requested that the City prezone the subject 4.84-acre site in advance of annexation, pursuant to RCW 35A.14.330, so that zoning will be in place at the time the subject site comes into the City. City of Renton wiUask the Boundary Review Board to invoke jurisdiction and annex an expanded area for a total of 25.7 acres. The City.is,proposing-R-4 and R-8 zoning for the site, consistent with the current Residential Single Family and Residential Low Density land use designation shown on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. The proposed prezone is considered to be a non- project action under SEPA. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housina Air Aesthetics Water LightIGlare Plants Recreation LandlShoreline Use. Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public SeNices Energyl Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14 000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas when dditional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. City Of.A.n Department of Planning IBuilding / PUbli.S ENVIRONMENTAL & ~VELOPMENT APPLICA T'1'5''N REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:T ~~()Y) COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 28, 2005 APPLICATION NO: LUA05-025, A, PZ, EbF DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 14, 2005 ~ APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT MANAGER: Don Erickson It t:'Cc;,~~IV~ &(418 _ .... ,V~IVD PROJECT TITLE: Anthone Annexation & Vicinity Prezone PLAN REVIEW: Jennifer Henning/Kayren Kittrick ··''''tr. ' SITE AREA: 21.2 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): NlA SUII v I 0 <'0'?f LOCATION: S of S 56th Street & E ~f Talbot Road WORK ORDER NO: 77392 .!IIVG D/I/,r-, ~/U!v SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicants for the Anthone Annexation have requested that the City prezone the subject 4.B4-acre site in advance of annexation, pursuant to RCW 35A.14.330, so that zoning will be in place at the time the subject site comes into the City. City of Renton will ask the Boundary Review Board to invoke jurisdiction and annex an expanded area for a total of 25.7 acres. The City.lsproposing R:4 and R-B zoning for the site, consistent with the current Residential Single Family and Residential Low Density land use designation shown on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. The proposed prezone is considered to be a non- project action under SEPA. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth . Housing Air Aesthetics Water Licht/Glare Plants Recreation LandlShoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ HistoriciCultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet . 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS N~ We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or .3 ttl ~ .,... w/l"" ..... on., inlonnalion is _10 ",,,,,,rly ass .. , Ih. propos.'. I I Date City of.n Department of Planning I Building I PUbli.S ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: • ·~·Ij Y COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 28, 2005~" C j;,;. 'V'c .. APPLICATION NO: LUA05-025, A, PZ, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 14,200 ";'r APPLICANT: Cit of Renton PROJECT TITLE: Anthone Annexation & Vicinit Prezone SITE AREA: 21.2 acres BUILDING AREA ross: N/A LOCATION: S of S 56th Street & E of Talbot Road I WORK ORDER NO: 77392 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicants for the Anthone Annexation have requested that the City prezone the subject 4.B4-acre site in advance of annexation, pursuant to RCW 35A.14.330, so that zoning will be in place at the time the subject site comes into the City. City of Renton will ask the Boundary Review Board to invoke jurisdiction and annex an expanded area for a total of 25.7 acres. The City is proposing R-4 and R-B zoning for the site, consistent with the current Residential Single Family and Residential Low Density land use deSignation shown on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. The proposed prezone is considered to be a non- project action under SEPA. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Eiement of the Probeble Probable More EnvIronment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts impacts Necessary impacts impacts Necessary Earth HousinQ Air Aesthetics Water Li,Clht/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet c. We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional info ation is needed to properly assess this proposal. Date '" ------1 Proposed Anthone ' Annexation o I Neighborhood Detail Map ® Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning • a. • Ale, Pietsch. AdminislralOr ~ G. Dcl Rosario 2S December 2004 - - -City Limits c::::J Proposed Annex Area l'(f.l!i<C>Si;~;1 Proposed Expanded Annex Area 200 1 : 2400 400 I City of f on Department of Planning / Building / Public rks EN VI RON MENTA L &lJIEVEL OPMENT A PPL leA TION RE VI E W SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: APPLICATION NO: LUA05-025, A, PZ, ECF APPLICANT: Cit of Renton fA. \ 1tA>J PROJECT TITLE: Anthone Annexation & Vicini Prezone SITE AREA: 21.2 acres LOCATION: S of S 56th Street &E of Talbot Road f'1:~ " '.0: " COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 28, 2005 ~ t.: f i l'j°'y DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 14,2005 /( PROJECT MANAGER: Don Erickson 8U/ f), PLAN REVIEW: Jennifer Henniri IKa ren'Klttrick DIIi/SI BUILDING AREA ross: NlA I WORK ORDER NO: 77392 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicants for the Anthone Annexation have requested that the City prezone the subject 4.84-acre site in advance of annexation, pursuant to RCW 35A.14.330, so that zoning will be in place at the time the subject Site comes into the City. City of Renton will ask the Boundary Review Board to invoke jurisdiction and annex an expanded area for a total of 25.7 acres. The City is proposing,R-4and R-B zoning for the site, consistelltwitbJhe current Residential Single Family and Residential Low Density land use designation shown on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. The proposed prezone is considered to be a non- project action under SEPA. , ' A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable Environment Minor Major Impacts' Impacts Eat1h Air Water Plants Land/Shoreline Use Animals Environmental Health Energy/ Natural Resources B. ,POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS l C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS NGVJ. More Information Necessary Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Housing Aesthetics Light/Glare Recreation Utilities Transpdt1ation Public Services Historic/Cultural Preservation AirpOt1 Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet " We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. -=,3o<:...Jl-,I.l.oB4L:>JL:::~ _______ _ Dat~ ~ City of ['on Department of Planning / Building / Public rks -ENVIRONMENTAL & tJ eVE LOP MEN TAP P Lie A T I 0 fn'f 'ffr tI': ~ ~ ~'f ~I ., Fire.. COMMENTS DUE: MARC~ 1.;:) " ~., REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ~~ ,2005 I ~4 ~005 MAR 1 5 ?OO~ APPLICATION NO: LUA05-025, A, PZ, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT MANAGER: Don E rickso~ PROJECT TITLE: Anthone Annexation & Vicinity Prezone PLAN REVIEW: Jennifer Hen ~iI}glK~ei,~it\~~k,~n~ T 9; J .. .... I ..... , r •• lin. ~_ •. , I SITE AREA: 21.2 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): NJA LOCATION: S of S 56th Street & E of Talbot Road I WORK ORDER NO: 77392 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicants for.the Anthone Annexation have requested that the City prezone the subject 4.84-acre site in advance of annexation, pursuant to RCW 35A.14.330, so that zoning will be in place at the time the subject site comes into the City. City of Renton will ask the Boundary Review Board to invoke jurisdiction and annex an expanded area for a total of 25.7 acres. '. The City.is,proposing.,R,,4 and R-8 zoning for the site, consistent.with the current Residential Single Family.:and,.Residential Low. Density land use designation shown on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. The proposed prezone is considered to be a non- project action under SEPA. " A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary , Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water LiahtiGlare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transoortation .' Environmental Health Public Services I'/"" Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14 000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS "'l ,-. I , 1 ! I I!I I J i! ..!J j 1 I City of i 'on Department of Planning I Building I Publi( rks ENVIRONMENTAL & l.IcVELOPMENT APPLICATrON REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ~o..r1L& COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 28, 2005 APPLICATION NO: LUA05-025, A, PZ, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 14,2005 . APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT MANAGER: Don Erickson PROJECT TITLE: Anthone Annexation & Vicinity Prezone PLAN REVIEW: Jennifer Henning/Kayren Kittrick SITE AREA: 21.2 acres BUILDING AREAJgros~: N/A LOCATION: S of S 56th Street & E of Talbot Road I WORK ORDER NO: 77392 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicants for the Anthone Annexation have requested that the City prezone the subject 4.S4-acre site in advance of annexation, pursuant to RCW 35A.14.330, so that zoning will be in place at the time the subject site comes into the City. City of Renton will ask the Boundary Review Board to invoke jurisdiction and annex an expanded area for a total of 25.7 acres. The City is proposing R"4and R,S.zoning for-the.site,::consistentwith the. current Residential Single Family and Residential Low Density land use designation shown on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. The proposed prezone is considered to be a non- project action under SEPA. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor MeJor Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth HousinQ Air Aesthetics Water LightIGlare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energyl Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14 000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or re additional inform . is needed to properly assess this proposal. / i 3/~()2 NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND'PR·O'POSE:DDETERMINATION OF .NON~SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) DATE: LAND USE NUMBER: APPLICATION NAME: March 14, 200S LUA-OS-02S, A, PZ, ECF ANTHONE ANNEXATION AND VICINITY PREZONE PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicants for the Anthone Annexation have requested that the City prezone the subject 4.84-acre site in advance of annexation, pursuant to RCW 35A.14.330, so that zoning will be in place at the time the subject site comes into the City. City of Renton will ask the Boundary Review Board to invoke jurisdiction and annex an expanded area for a total of 25.7 acres. Th~ City is proposing R-4 and R-8 zonil1g for the site, consistent with the current Residential Single Family and Residential Low Density land use designation shown on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. The proposed prezone is considered to be a non-project action under SEPA. PROJECT LOCATION: This project abuts the City boundary on three sides: south of S. 55th Street, east of Talbot Avenue and north of the Springbrook area. It is located in the NE 1/4 of Section 9, Township 22 North, Range 5 East. OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (DNS): As the Lead Agency, the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed non-project action. Therefore, as permitted under the RCW 43.21 C.11 0, the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS process to give notice that a DNS is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the 'proposed DNS are integrated into a sjngle comment period. There will be no comment period following the issiJance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance (DNS). A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: March 2, 2005 March 14, 2005 Permits/Review Requested: Other Permits which may be required: Requested Studies: Location where application.may be reviewed: PUBLIC HEARING: CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Land Use: Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: Proposed MItigation Measures: Environmental (SEPA) Checklist and Rezone N/A N/A PlanningIBuildinglPublic Works Department, Development Services Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055 Council accepted the proposed Direct Petition to annex at its public hearing on January 24, 2005 and held the first of two required public hearings on the proposed prezoning on this same date. The subject site is located within the Residential Single Family (RS) and Residential Low Density (RLD) Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designation. The proposed prezone is consistent with these land use designations, as well as relevant land use policies adopted in November 2004. Environmental Checklist dated March 2, 2005. This non-project action will be subject to the City's SEPA Ordinance and Development Regulations and other applicable codes and regulations as appropriate. The analysis of the proposed non-project action does not reveal any adverse environmental impacts requiring mitigation above and beyond existing code provisions. However, mitigation may be necessary and may be imposed at the time of a site specific development proposal is made under R-8 zoning at some time in the future on the subject annexation site. NOA 05·025.doc Comments on the above appllvdtion must be submitted in writing to Don Erickson, Pr"lclct Manager, Strategic Planning Division, EDNSP Department, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055, by 5:00 PM on March 28, 2005. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact the Project Manager. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: DON ERICKSON (425) 430-6581 1 PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FORPROPEFi· FILE IDENTIFICATION .1 If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project, complete this form and return to: City of Renton, Development Planning, 1055 South Grady iNay, Renton, WA 98055. File NoJName: LUA-OS-02S, A, PZ, ECFI Anthone Annexation & Vicinity Prezone NAME: ADDRESS: ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ __ TELEPHONE NO.: __________ _ NOA OS-02S.doc NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) DATE: March 14, 2005 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-05-025, A. PZ, ECF :_:'" ~ 'APPUCATION NAME: ANTHONE ANNEXATION AND VICINtTY PREZONE PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicants lor tho Anthone Annexation have requested that the City prezone the 8ubJect 4.84·acro site in advance of annexation. pursuant to ACW 35A.14.330. so that zoning will be in place at the time the su~ject slle comes into the City. City of Renton will ask the Boundary Review Board to Invokejurlsdlclion and annex an expanded area for a total of 25.7 acres. The City is proposIng R·4 and R·e zoning for the sIte. consIstent with the current ResIdential Single Family and Residential Low Density land use desIgnation shown on the Comprehensive Plan I Land Uso Map. The proposed prezonols considered to bo a non·project action undor SEPA. PROJECT LOCATION: This project abuts the City boundary on three sides: south of S. 55t~ Street, east of Talbot Avenue and north of the Springbrook area. It Is located In the NE 1/4 of Section 9. Township 22 North, Range 5 East. OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (DNSj: A, tho Lead Agency, Ihe City of Renton has dolermined that signIficant environmental Impacts are unlikely to resul! trom the proposed non·proJect actJon. Therefors, es pennltted under the RCW 43.21 C.110, the City of Renton Is using the Optional DNS process to give notice that a DNS Is likely to be Issued. Comment per/ods for the project and the proposed DNS are Integrated Into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the Issuance of the Threshold DetermInation of Non-Significance (ONS). A t 4·day appeal period will foHow tha tssuance of the ONS. PERMIT APPUCATION DATE: NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: March 2, 2005 March 14, 2005 Pannlts/Revlew Requested: Other Permits which may be requIred: RoqUOo1ed Studl .. : Location where applicatfon may be reviewed: PUBUC HEARING: CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Land Uae: Environmental Document. that Evelueta the Propoaed Prolect: Development Regulation. Us'" For ProllCl MRlgatlon: Propoaed Mitigation Meaauroa: Environmental (SEPA) Checklist and Rezone NIA NIA Plannlng/Bulldlng/Publlc Works Department, Development Services DivIsion. 1055 Sou1h Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055 Council accepted the proposed DIrect Pelltlon to annex at its public hearing on January 24, 2005 and held the first of two required public hearings on the proposed prezonlng on this 8ame date. The subjoct ,110 I, located within the Re,ldentlal Single Family (RS) and Aesldentlallow Density (AlD) Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map desIgnation, The proposed prezone 18 consistent with these land use designations, as we1! as relevant land use poliCies adopted In November 2004. Environmental Checklist dated March 2. 2005. This non·project actIon will be subject to the CIty's SEPA Ordinance and Development Regulatlons and other applicable codes and regulations as appropriate. The analysis of the proposed non-project Bctlon does not reveal any adverse envlronmentallmpacls requiring mitigation above and beyond existing code provisions. However. mitigation may be necessary and may be Imposed at the Ume of a site specIfic development proposal!s made under R·B zoning at some lime In the future on the subject annexation site. NOA O!!o<I25.doc Comments on the aboVe application must be submitted In wrillng to Don Erlcklon, Project Manager, Strategic Planning Division, EDNSP Department, t055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055, by 5:00 PM on March 28, 2005. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notilication by mall. contact the Project Manager. Anyone who submits wrltten commonts will automatically become a party 01 record and will be notitied 01 any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: DON ERICKSON (425) 430-6581 I PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION Proposed Anthone' Annexation NeIgt1borhoodDII'taHMap ~-~.......-, .... ...-. vrt5-=----Cl,u.w:. ImE3 ~",-.w. _~E.,.ra.:tAmt,~'" 1: 2400 400! j r If you would lIke to bo made a party of record to receive further Information on this proposed project, complete this form and retum 10: City of Renton, Development Planning, tOSS Sou1h Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. File NoJName: LUA-04-025, A, PZ, ECFI Anthone Annexation & Vicinity Prezone NAME: ________________________________________________________ _ ADDRESS: __________________________________________________ ___ TELEPHONE NO.: _______________ __ NOAOB.025.doo CERTIFICATION ("" I, ---I<:::...:.....L.L:~~=.£~..c.:..r7A-' hereby certify that 1../ copies of the above document were posted by me in conspicuous places or neai.-~y the described property on ,,,,,,,,,,,,,\\ : ........... ~~~~~. ,/j-dM5 SIGNED: ~ ~ ~ l.--" .: •• ' CpMMIS&". , 0 # " .' AI ~"o" " , ..., . ·yo " ~., ·d· . : .:b :' T ,~ scribed and SSZwo . before me, a eSI m m '-t' -0 '~ . ~ m : C:. , on the JJ' day of --'L..-!~",""c..L.b-.rc... ___ ___ ~ ,-~ -', ~ 0 ',"t' V( ;:,: 'J'i ' ~ "<' ,,~ Ie ~ ... .,., ! \ ~',,:q;> ..... l' '· •• :~JtiNGTO~ ....... : ',\\\, .... , ............ .. · ,. '.;;: '.(: .<" )·;·:v',/) :., , 'OF RENTON' f;:" ," ;, ", :cURRI;NT:Rh~NNIN'~I:,D!VI~iQN:':::'(' ;-i' AFFIDAvlr'OFsER:VICE':'~Y'MAlL'1 " ! ' .' , I., ·'1 t: On the 14 day of March, 2005, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Notice of Application & Determination of Non-Significance, PMTs and Environmental Checklist documents. This information was sent to: Agencies See Attached Surrounding Property Owners (NOA only) See Attached List (Signature of Sende I;": --.2:.!.!!bI"Y-4:4a4.i!:~~.J------"::"""~~-----=~~ STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING ) ) SS ) (/)'. PUBLIC ;"')". ...~ 'Y '. .' 0 /o.t,:·.~·29-01.""r.1' .: ." 0 ........ ~'J" .. -- I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Holly Graber II',::-\~~~,~~~""" signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Notary (Print): ____ MA!o~~~+I:!I+'-------------M/\Rll¥N KAMGI=II!5; My appointment expires: MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES 6-29-07 Anthone Annexation and Vicinity Prezone LUA05-025, A, PZ, ECF template -affidavit of service by mailing r l Dept. of.Ecology • Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 O"lympia, WA 98504-7703 WSDOT Northwest Region • Attn: Ramin Pazooki King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240 PO Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 US Army Corp. of Engineers * Seattle District Office Attn: SEPA Reviewer PO Box C-3755 Seattle, WA 98124 Jamey Taylor * Depart. of Natural Resources PO Box 47015. Olympia, WA 98504-7015 KC Dev. & Environmental Servo Attn: SEPA Section 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 Metro Transit Senior Environmental Planner Gary Kriedt AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING (ERe DETERMINATIONS) WDFW -Stewart Reinbold • Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. * c/o Department of Ecology Attn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer 3190 160th Ave SE 39015 _172nd Avenue SE Bellevue, WA 98008 Auburn, WA 98092 Duwamish Tribal Office • Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program * 4717 W Marginal Way SW Attn: Ms Melissa Calvert Seattle, WA 98106-1514 39015 172nd Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092-9763 KC Wastewater Treatment Division • Office of Archaeology & Historic Environmental Planning Supervisor Preservation· Ms. Shirley Marroquin Attn: Stephanie Kramer 201 S. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050 PO Box 48343 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 Olympia, WA 98504-8343 City of Newcastle City of Kent Attn: Mr. Micheal E. Nicholson Attn: Mr. Fred Satterstrom, AICP Director of Community Development Acting Community Dev. Director 13020 SE 72nd Place 220 Fourth Avenue South Newcastle, WA 98059 Kent, WA 98032-5895 Puget Sound Energy City of Tukwila Municipal Liason Manager Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official Joe Jainga 6300 Southcenter Blvd. 201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431 PO Box 90868, MS: XRD-01W Tukwila, WA 98188 Seattle, WA 98104-3856 Bellevue, WA 98009-0868 Seattle Public Utilities Real Estate Services Title Examiner 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 PO Box 34018 Seattle, WA 98124-4018 Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS", the marked agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy of the checklist, PMT's, and the notice of application. • Also note, do not mail Jamey Taylor any of the notices she gets hers from the web. Only send her the ERC Determination paperwork. template -affidavit of service by mailing Smooth feed Sheets™ ", . 052205908503 SINGH SATW ANT 24419 105TH PL SE KENT W A 98030 062205914302 KOZHENEVSKY ALEKSANDER VIKT POBOX88233 SEATTLE WA 98138 312305902404 AHLUWALIA RA VINDER SINGH+JA 730E 55TH ST RENTON W A 98055 312305911900 SINGHKARNAIL 5218 TALBOT RD S RENTON W A 98055 338820001000 NANN SOPHAT H+SOV ANNA LINDA 19210 99TH PL S RENTON W A 98055 338820004004 RILEY RANDY J 19240 99TH PL S RENTON W A 98055 338820008005 LANPHERE JAMES G+MINH THI 19414 99TH PL S RENTON W A 98055 338820011009 PETERSON LINDA G+ JOSEPH 19219 99TH PL S RENTON W A 98055 338820014003 BADERPATIUCKJ+DELORESB 19249 99TH PL S RENTON W A 98055 • AVERY® Address Labels vJ2205904502 SHEEHAN NANCY 2482 LABIEUX RD NANAIMO BC V9T3M6 062205900103 MUNDAY ELSIE 19221 TALBOT RD RENTON WA 98055 272850013009 WITT PAUL+FREIDA 617 S 53RD PL RENTON WA 98055 312305908005 PENOR JOSEFINA 520 S 55TH ST RENTON WA 98055 312305912502 WILSON ROBERT D 720 S 55TH ST RENTON WA 98055 338820002008 PADDA GURDEV 19218 99TH PL S RENTON W A 98055 338820005001 ZEMECK VIRGINIA M 19250 99TH PL S RENTON WA 98055 338820009003 ADAMS JOHN DELNO+MARY LOIS 19203 99TH PL S RENTON WA 98055 338820012007 LEWIS MARK S+KRISTI S 19229 99TH PL S RENTON WA 98055 338820015000 ABBOTT MIKE E 19261 99TH PL S RENTON WA 98055 Use template for S66C)® _J2205907703 SINGH HARCHAND+ANGREJ LAUR 19225 102ND AV SE RENTON W A 98055 062205906100 GALLAGHER DAVID GEORGE POBOX 1122 RENTON W A 98057 312305902305 SPRINGBROOK C/O HSC REAL ESTATE INC POBOX 19001 SEATTLE WA 98109 312305911504 SPRINGBROOK C/O HSC REAL ESTATE INC POBOX 19001 SEATTLE WA 98109 312305915604 SNYDER GORDON 750 S 55TH ST RENTON W A 98055 338820003006 CHU QUOC BAO+KHANH K PRAM 19230 99TH PL S RENTON WA 98055 338820006009 REAR LOIS 19260 99TH PL S RENTON WA 98055 338820010001 PEDRO JOHN F+MARY ELLEN 19211 99TH PL S RENTON W A 98055 338820013005 COVAL ROBERT L+MALLIKA 19239 99TH PL S RENTON WA 98055 338820016008 FREED PHYLLIS E 19341 99TH PL S RENTON WA 98055 Clear Laser 566C)® S{'1o~th lFeed. Sheets™ 338832006005 MEDLOCK CLYDE & NANCY PURCE 10006 SE 192ND RENTON WA 98055 338832020006 MEDLOCK CLYDE C 10006 SE 192ND RENTON WA 98055 338832023000 SQVARE Wll..BERT E SR+CELIA 12572SE 231ST ST KENT W A 98031 793100000603 PROPERTY MANAGER CITY OF RENTON . 1055 SOUTH GRADY WAY RENTON W A 98055 793100012004 GALLAGHER DONALD 19225 TALBOTRD S . RENTON W A 98055 793100012509 CITY OF RENTON 1055 S GRADY WY RENTON WA 98055 793100014406 SINGH ·HARCHAND ET AL 13955 INTERVRBAN.A V S #A TUKWll..A WA 98168 . 793100015304 A~Mo\ANTHONELAURANCE~~ 35705 21ST PL S ; S2-'2\ab FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 794120002009 . GUERZON ZENAIDA F 2117 N 53RD ST SEATTLE WA 98103 794120005002 . HAYASHI HENRY KEN 19239 98TH AV S RENTON WA 98055 • AVERY® Address Labels .,.,8832018000 SMITH WESLEYG+DORA THY M 10026 SE 192ND ST RENTON WA 98055 338832021004 MEDLOCK CLYDE & NANCY PURCE 10006 SE 192ND RENTON WA 98055 338832024008 MCDONALD ROGER M 10033 SE 192ND ST ·RENTON WA 98055 793100000702 CITY OF RENTON 1055 S GRADY WY RENTON W A 98055 793100012103 CITY OF RENTON 1055 S GRADY WY RENTON WAY 98055 793100012608 CITY OF RENTON 1055 S GRADYWY RENTON WA 98055 793100015106 . MOLINA SABINA 9609 S 192ND ST. RENTON WA 98055 ·793100015403 MOLINA ALEX C 9609 S 192ND ST RENTON W A 98055 794120003007 OLSON CHARLES 19227 98TH AV S RENTON WA 98055 794120006000 CHEEMA NIRMAL+CHEEMA PARMINDERS 19245 98TH AV S RENTON W A 98055 Use template for S66C)® _058832019008 KOOPMANSARVEN FAMll.. Y LNlN· ' 10020 SE 192ND ST . RENTON W A 98055 338832022002 NGUYEN MINH SON 195 POWELL AV SW RENTON W A 98055 793100000504 CLEVELAND EDWIN H&VIRGINIA 19415 SPRINGBROOKRD RENTON W A 98055 793100011105 SCHOLENWA 19418 SRRINGBROOK RD RENTON W A 98055 793100012202 LANPHERE JAMES G+MINH THI 19414 99TH PL S RENTON W A 98055 793100014000 Gll..L BAL WINDER 10885 214TH PL KENT VIA 98031 793100015205 MOLINA ALEX C 9609 S 192ND ST RENTON WA 98055 794120001001 BITEMAN)AMES F+RUTA D 19203 98TH AV S RENTON WA 98055 794120004005 ANDERSON STACY L 11413 SE 302ND CT AUBURNWA 98092 794120007008 DALLA SANTA Wll..LIAM A 19251 98TH AV S RENTON WA 98055 Clear Laser S66C)® Smooth Feed Sheets™ . '. ) 794120008006 FERRELL STEVEN R+LAURA J 1925598THAVS RENTON W A 98055 794120011000 BARUSO MICHAEL A+DEBRA M 19267 98TH AV S RENTON WA 98055 794120014004 GUZMAN JANELLE 19242 98TH AV S' RENTON W A 98055 794120017007 POTRAMARIA 19222 98TH AV S RENTON W A 98055 794120020001 LEELENNYL 19237 98TH PL S RENTON W A 98055 794120023005 KINGCOUNTY 500 KC ADMIN BLDG 5004THAV SEATTLE WA 98104 855720003000 BROOKS DWAYNE W+MARIA 9620 S 194TH ST RENTON WA 98055 855720006003 GARCIA NELSON A+NOEMI C PO BOX 297 RENTON W A 98057 855720009007 ESSLEMAN TEYBA+HUSSEIN IBRAHIM 9653 S 194TH ST RENTON W A 98055 855720012001 CHIU SHAO-HUA 9641 S 194TH ST RENTON W A 98055 • AVERY® Address Labels .;14120009004 HA YATSUCHRISTOPHER T 19259 98TH AV S RENTONWA 98055 794120012008 TYNDALL RACHEL D 19271 98TH AV S RENTON W A 98055 794120015001 MAIDON 19236 98TH AV S RENTON W A 98055 794120018005 TRAPP HARRY D+AGNES T 19223 98TH PL S RENTON W A 98055 794120021009 REYRAOROWENALaYBELP 19243 98TH PL S RENTON WA 98055 855720001004 HERNANDEZ JULIE R+FIDEL V 9612 S 194TH ST RENTON W A 98055 855720004008 BUI THONG DINH+HIEN TID NGUYEN 9626 S 194TH ST RENTON W A 98055 855720007001 TABISULA ENRICH & JOn 9654 S 194TH ST RENTON WA 98055 855720010005 LIU GANG+WAGNER HONG Q 9649 S 194TH ST RENTON WA 98055 855720013009 HOTOMMY 9637 S 194TH ST RENTON W A 98055 Use template for S66()® .)4120010002 TRAUTMAN PAMELA J 19263 98THAV S RENTON WA 98055 794120013006 N"ot~ll\}oobl{ BERGAN GARY~ ~c;.ed· 10218 1ST AV SW t;lZ21~ SEATTLE WA 98146 794120016009 ORTEGA BENJAMIN+IGNACIO 19230 98TH AV S RENTON WA 98055 794120019003 HUNGERFORD CHARLES+SANDRA 19231 98TH PL S RENTON WA 98055 794120022007 LINK MICHAEL S+waLA J 19249 98TH PL S RENTON WA 98055 855720002002 POQUIZ ANTONIO F+POQUIZ EST 9616 S 194TH ST RENTON WA 98055 855720005005 PRASADPREM 9640 S 194TH ST RENTON W A 98055 855720008009 KAUR GURBRINDER 9657 S 194TH ST RENTON W A 98055 855720011003 RcluYV\-k:>~ UANON YONGYUT ET AL 5123105" 18919 114TH CT SE RENTON WA 98056 855720014007 CLINE DAVID+RACQUEL 9633 S 194TH ST RENTON W A 98055 Clear Laser 566C)® Smooth Feed Sheets™ ~ .~ .. ' { .. 855720015004 CHIN EDWIN Y+NAKAMURA JENNI 9627 S 194TH ST RENTON W A 98055 855720018008 KING COUNTY 500 KC ADMIN BLDG 5004THAV SEATTLE WA 98104 • AVERY® Address Labels ,,55720016002 TAGGART BRUCE W+CLAUDIA A 9621 S 194TH ST RENTON WA 98055 855720019006 ROCHE ELAINE ADAIRRE 3200 130TH A V NE BELLEVUE WA 98005 Use template for S66()® ,,55720017000 NGUYEN QUANG T 9615 S 194TH ST RENTON W A 98055 Clear Laser S66()® Date: To: From: CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM March 14,2005 File Development Planning Division Subject: Anthone Annexation & Vicinity Prezone LUA05-025, A, PZ, ECF The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on April 5, 2005. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. City of Renton LAND USE PERMIT MASTER APPLICATION PROPERTY OWNER(S) PROJECT INFORMATION NAME: CITY OF RENTON PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: Prezoning of the Anthone Annexation Site and surrounding vicinity. ADDRESS: 1055 S. Grady Way PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION AND ZIP CODE: This site is located south of the City boundary at S. 55h Street and CITY: Renton ZIP: 98055 east of the City boundary at Talbot Road S. Please see attached map. TELEPHONE NUMBER: 425-430-6581 KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): 31230-59024; 33882-00020, -00030, -00040, -00050, -00060, APPLICANT (if other than owner) -00080, -00090, -00100, -00110,-00120,-00130, -00140,- 00150, -00160; 79310-00151--00154; 79412-00010, -00020, - NAME: Don Erickson 00030, -00040, -00050, -00060,-00070, -00080, -00090,- 00100, -00110, -00120, -00130,-00140, -00150, -00160,- 00170, -00180, -00190,-00200, -00210, -00220, -00230; COMPANY (if applicable): EDNSP Department 85572-00010, -00020, -00030, -00040, -00050,-00060,- 00070, -00080, -00090, -00100, -00110, -00120, -00130,- 00140, -00150, -00160, -00170, -00180, -00190 ADDRESS: 1055 S. Grady Way EXISTING LAND USE(S):54 detached single-family units and one 5-unit multi-family development. CITY: Renton ZIP: 98055 PROPOSED LAND USE(S): Single family detached housing TELEPHONE NUMBER 425-430-6581 at densities of up to eight units per net acre. EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: CONTACT PERSON (RLD) Residential Low Density and (RS) Residential Single- Family. NAME: PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): (RLD) Residential Low Density and (RS) COMPANY (if applicable): Residential Single-Family. EXISTING ZONING: King County R-6; 6 units per gross acre ADDRESS: PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): Renton R-4, 4 units per net acre and Renton R-B, B units per net acre. CITY: ZIP: SITE AREA (in ~quare feet): 923,472 tf (21.2 acres) SQUARE FOOTAGE OF ROADWAYS TO BE DEDICATED TELEPHONE NUMBER AND E-MAIL ADDRESS: FOR SUBDIVISIONS OR PRIVATE STREETS SERVING THREE LOTS OR MORE (if applicable): nla Q:web/pw/devserv/formslplanninglmasterapp.doc 02/18/05 PRO~ CT INFORMA TION (continu ) PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET PROJECT VALUE: niB ACRE (if applicable): Four units per net acre and Eight units per net acre IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA. PLEASE INCLUDE NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable): nla SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): niB I:l AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA ONE I:l AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA TWO NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): niB SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL I:l FLOOD HAZARD AREA sq. ft. BUILDINGS (if applicable): nla I:l GEOLOGIC HAZARD a{}.{J.x. 191, 000 sq. ft. SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL I:l HABITAT CONSERVATION sq. ft. BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): nla SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL I:l SHORELINE STREAMS AND LAKES sq. ft. BUILDINGS (if applicable): nla I:l WETLANDS sq. ft. SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): niB NET FLOOR AREA OF NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): niB '" " , NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW PROJECT (if appli~able):, nla LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (Attach legal description on separate sheet with the following information included) SITUATE IN THE NE QUARTER OF SECTION _6_. TOWNSHIP 22N ,RANGE 5E ,IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. , ' TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES List all land use applications being applied for: 1. Rezone , , 3. 2. ,Environmental'Checklist , 4. '" Staff will calculate applicable fees and postaqe: $ AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I, (Print Name/s) Rebecca Lind , declare that I am (please check one) _ the current owner of the property involved in this application or'_' _X_ the authorized representative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing statements and answers h~rein contained and the information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Rebecca Lind (Signature of Owner/Representative) (Signature of Owner/Representative) Q:web/pw/devserv/forms/planninglmasterapp.doc I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that ~::--:--:----:--;--:--7-:--:7 signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. 02/18/05 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or j'does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays late~. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for non project proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. H:\EDNSP\PAA\Annexations\Anthone'\SEPA Checklist.doc02/25/05 A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Anthone Annexation site and surrounding vicinity prezone. R-4 and R-8 prezoning of approximately 21.2 acres including the 4.8 acre Anthone Annexation site and the surrounding properties in the existing Talbot Estates, Hi-Park and Spring Brook Acres plats. This land is located south of South 55th Street, north of City Limits, east of Talbot Road S and west of the eastern line of Section 6, Township 22N and Range 5E. 2. Name of applicant: City of Renton 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Economic Development Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Renton City Hall, (fh Floor 1055 South Grad Way Renton, WA 98055 Contact: Don Erickson, Senior Planner Phone: (425) 430-6581 4. Date checklist prepared: February 21,2005 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Nla non-project action 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. . Nla non-project action 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Nla non-project action 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No. H:\EDNSP\PAA\Annexations\Anthone'\SEPA Checklist.doc 2 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. City Council must give approval of the annexation and zoning. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. This non-project action includes pre-zoning approximately 21.2 acres in Renton's Potential Annexation Area. 4.84 acres (the Anthone annexation site) are currently being considered for annexation using the 60% Direct Petition method. Under RCW 43.21.C.222 annexations are specifically exempted from SEPA. RCW 35.A.14.330-340 provides for rezoning potential annexation areas. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available; While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The prezone area is south of city limits at S. 55th Street, east of city limits at Talbot Rd. S. and north of city limits in the Springbrook area. The prezone area is adjacent to city limits on three sides and the easterly boundary of the area is the eastern boundary line of Section 6, Township 22N, Range 5E. This site includes the Hi-Park 1st Addition, Talbot Estates and Spring Brook Acres plats, plus the properties owned by Anthone, Molina and Ahluwalia. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other _____ _ The majority ofthe site is relatively flat, with a couple rolling areas, with a 2-3% slope upwards from east to west. The southern portion of the site (lot 9 of the Spring Brook Acres Plat) has a 15% slope downwards from northeast to southwest. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) Approximately 15%. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Nla non-project action H:\EDNSP\PAA\Annexations\Anthone'\SEPA Checklist.doc 3 d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Nla non-project action f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Nla non-project action g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Nla non-project action h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Nla non-project action 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (Le., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Nla non-project action b. Are there any off-site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. Nla non-project action c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Nla non-project action 3. WATER a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. H:\EDNSP\PAA\Annexations\Anthone'\SEPA Checklist.doc 4 The southern lands of the proposal are adjacent to the North Fork of Springbrook Creek, a class three stream, which feeds into the main channel of Springbrook Creek, a class two stream. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Nla non-project action 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Nla non-project action 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Nla non-project action 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year flood plain? If 50, note location on the site plan. No. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If 50, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. Nla non-project action b. Ground Water: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Nla non-project action 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals ... ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Nla non-project action c. Water Runoff (including storm water): H :\EDNSP\P AA \Annexations\Anthone'\SEPA Checklist.doc 5 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters, If so, describe. Nla non-project action 2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Nla non-project action d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Nla non-project action 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: 1-deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other 1-evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other 1-shrubs 1-grass __ pasture __ crop or grain __ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other __ water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other __ other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Nla non-project action c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Nla non-project action 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: H:\EDNSP\PAA\Annexations\Anthone'\SEPA Checklist.doc 6 b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain No. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Nla non-project action 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether· it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Nla non-project action b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. Nla non-project action c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Nla non-project action 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. Nla non-project action 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Nla non-project action 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Nla non-project action b. Noise H:\EDNSP\PAA\Annexations\Anthone'\SEPA Checklist.doc 7 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? N/a non-project action 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. N/a non-project action 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: N/a non-project action 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The current use of this area is primarily for detached single-family residences. There are currently 54 single-family residences and one five-unit multi-family complex. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No. c. Describe any structures on the site. There are 54 detached single-family residences on this site, one five-unit multi-family complex and a few accessory buildings/garages. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? This is a non-project action and it is unlikely that any of the structures will be demolished. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? King County, R-6, 6 units per gross acre. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? King County, Urban residential 4-12 units per acre and Renton, Low Density Residential and Single Family Residential. The Low Density Residential area is composed of the western half of the property (the Anthone and Molina properties and the Talbot Estates plat) and the large parcel to the south (Jot 9 of the Spring Brook Acres plat). The rest of the property is single family residential (the Spring Brook Acres plat with the exception of lot nine, the Hi-Park 1st Addition and the Ahluwalia property). H:\EDNSP\PAA\Annexations\Anthone'\SEPA Checklist.doc 8 g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Nla h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. The large parcel that runs the length of the southern boundary of this area (lot 9 of the Spring Brook Acres plat) has steep slopes, landslide hazards and erosion hazards. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? This is a non-project action. Currently 41 dwelling units occupy the portion to be prezoned R-8 and 18 dwelling units in the area to be prezoned R-4 for a total estimate of 147 residents. Under the proposed zoning conditions there could be an additional 16 new dwelling units or 40 residents. It is anticipated that the population of the area under the proposed zoning regulations would be approximately 187 people. Under King County regulations the area has a potential for 24 new dwelling units or 60 residents for a total of 207 people. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? Nla non-project action k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Nla non-project action I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The proposed prezoning will help ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses' and plans, if any. 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. This is a non-project action. Currently there are 59 dwelling units (54 single-family detached and one five-unit mulitifamily complex) on this site, primarily in three fully developed plats. Development under the proposed prezoning would allow up to 16 additional detached single-family units. This compares to an additional 24 potential single family units under King County's regulations. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. H:\EDNSP\PAA\Annexations\Anthone'\SEPA Checklist.doc 9 Nla non-project action. No units are proposed to be eliminated but this proposal would most likely result in eight fewer units at full buildout. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Nla non-project action 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s}, not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s} proposed. Nla non-project action b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Nla non-project action c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Nla non-project action 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Nla non-project action b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Nla non-project action c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Nla non-project action d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Nla non-project action 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? H:\EDNSP\PAA\Annexations\Anthone'\SEPA Checklist.doc 10 This is a non-project action. The project is adjacent to Cleveland Park to the Southwest and the Springbrook Watershed park to the South. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. Nla non-project action c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Nla non-project action. Future development would be required to pay Renton's Parks Mitigation Fee. 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or· objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. Nla non-project action b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. Nla non-project action c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Nla non-project action 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The site is served by a col/ector arterial-Talbot Road South. This is a non-project proposal. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? No, the nearest transit stop is approximately % of a mile away from the site. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Nla non-project action H:\EDNSP\PAA\Annexations\Anthone'\SEPA Checklist.doc 11 d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private? Nla non-project action. Future development must comply with Renton's Development Regulations. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. Nla non-project action f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Assuming the most likely scenario of 75 units at full development under Renton's proposed prezoning, it is estimated that there would be approximately 750 AWDTE. This compares with an estimated 83 units and 830 AWDTE at full development under the current conditions. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Nla non-project action 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. , Nla non-project action. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Nla non-project action 16. UTILITIES a. natural gas~se se~ Nla non-project action b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Nla non-project action C. SIGNATURE H:\EDNSP\PAA\Annexations\Anthone'\SEPA Checklist.doc 12 I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: Name Printed: Rebecca Lind for City of Renton Date: H:\EDNSP\PAA\Annexations\Anthone'\SEPA Checklist.doc 13 D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEETS FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? It is unlikely that the proposal would have any affect on the above environmental issues. Additional residential development is likely to occur on this site with or without the proposal. However, under the proposed Renton prezoning full development of the site would result in fewer residential units than under the current King County zoning. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: New development resulting as a consequence of these proposed amendments would be required to comply with the City's development regulations. 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? There would be no affect on plants, animals, fish, or marine life as a direct consequence of this non-project, prezoning proposal. There may be some displacement of eXisting vegetation to clear undeveloped lots for future development, which is likely to occur under the both the present conditions and the proposal. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: None at this non-project level. Development of additional dwelling units under this proposal must comply with City of Renton regulations and with Renton's Critical Areas Ordinance. Any measures needed in this regard will be implemented at the project level review. 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? The proposed non-project action will not deplete energy or natural resources. Future project level development may impact energy or natural resources slightly but will not deplete them. Full development of the proposal would impact energy and natural resources slightly less than the current conditions. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: None are proposed at this non-project action stage. H:\EDNSP\PAA\Annexations\Anthone'\SEPA Checklist.doc 14 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, flood plains, or prime farmlands? This proposal would likely not use or affect environmentally sensitive areas. At such time that additional dwelling units are developed on this site, they will be subject to City of Renton critical area regulations and development standards that are designed to protect environmentally sensitive areas. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: Nla. 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? The proposed prezoning of this area will increase compatibility with the surrounding uses since it will· limit future development to single-family detached housing currently prevalent in the area. King. County zoning allows both detached and attached units in its R-6 zone. City of Renton zoning would allow fewer units to be built in this area, which is adjacent to the Springbrook Watershed. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: None. 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? At current levels of development there are 59 units and approximately 590 A WDVTE in this area. The proposed prezoning would allow a fewer number of units than the current King county R-6 zoning. At full development there is a potential for 75 units, or 750 AWDVTE, under proposed Renton prezoning. This compares with 83 units and 830 AWDVTE at maximum development under King County's zoning. This additional number of trips generated in either the Renton or the King County scenario is unlikely to have noticeable impacts on transportation. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: None. 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. The proposal will not conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for protection of the environment. SIGNATURE H:\EDNSP\PAA\Annexations\Anthone'\SEPA Checklist.doc 15 I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: Name Printed: Date: ENVCHLST.DOC . REVISED 6/98 Rebecca Lind for City of Renton H:\EDNSP\PAA\Annexations\Anthone'\SEPA Checklist.doc 16 ANTHONE ANNEXATION AND VICINITY PREZONE PROJECT NARRATIVE AND PROPOSALS~Y The applicants for the proposed Anthone Annexation have requested that the City prezone the subject 4.84-acre site in advance of annexation, pursuant to RCW 35A.14.330, so zoning will be in place at the time the subject site comes into the City. In addition, Renton will ask the Boundary Review Board to invoke jurisdiction to annex an expanded area. Approximately 25.7 acres of land in the vicinity of the initial Anthone Annexation site form an unincorporated peninsula surrounded on three sides by Renton City Limits. The area is composed of the Anthone Annexation site (the Anthone and Molina properties), three fully developed plats (Talbot Estates, Spring Brook Acres and Hi-Park 1 st Addition), and a portion of the Ahluwalia property that lies south of S. 55th Street (the portion north of the right of way is within City Limits). Annexation of either the initial Anthone Annexation site or the expanded area is considered to be exempt from SEP A. However, the prezoning of the area does require SEP A review. The City is proposing to prezone a portion of the expanded area R-4 and a portion of it R-8. The total acreage to be prezoned is 21.2 acres (the gross acreage of the area without the streets). In the Renton Comprehensive Plan the western portion of the area and the southern portion of the area, which includes the Anthone and Molina properties, the Talbot Estates plat, and lot nine of the Spring Brook Acres plat, is designated as Residential Low Density. The eastern portion of the area, which includes the Spring Brook Acres plat (excepting lot nine), the Hi-Park 15t Addition plat and the Ahluwalia property, is designated Residential Single Family. In order to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, it is proposed to prezone the portion designated Residential Low Density as Renton R-4 and to prezone the portion designated Residential Single Family as Renton R-8. The proposed prezone is considered to be a non-project action under SEPA. Tht,: proposed prezoning site is located south of City Limits at S. 55 th Street, east of City Limits at Talbot Road S., and north of City Limits at the Springbrook watershed site. The area is bounded on the east by the section line for Section 6, Township 22N, Range 5E. The surrounding zoning to the north ofthe site includes Renton R-14 residential 14 units per net acre, R-l residential one unit per net acre and R-8 residential eight units per net acre. The property south of the site is zoned Renton RC resource conservation. The site itself and the property to the east is zoned King County R-6 residential six units per gross acre and the areas west of the site is King County R-l residential one unit per gross acre. The majority of the expanded annexation area has been fully developed in three plats. Talbot Estates is fully developed with 17 single-family detached units. Hi-Park 1 st Addition is fully developed with 15 single-family detached units. Spring Brook Acres is essentially fully developed with 21 single-family detached units and one five-unit multi-family complex. There is only one iJndeveloped lot in Spring Brook Acres, lot 9, which is entirely dominated by sensitive areas and highly unlikely to develop. There is one small lot about 7500 ft2, owned by Ahluwalia, which lies south ofS. 55 th Street and west of 99th Place S. This is a portion of the same property north of S. 55th Street, but since the property is divided by a public right-of-way the lot could be built upon as a separate lot. There are also the Molina and Anthone properties containing one single-family dwelling: These 4.84 acres account for nearly all of the development potential for the expanded annexation area. Anthone Annexation and Vicinity Prezone Justification The area proposed for prezoning has already been designated for Residential Low Density and Residential Single Family development in the Renton Comprehensive Plan. King County's Comprehensive Plan has designated the area for urban development at a density of 4-12 dwelling units per gross acre. The portion that is designated Residential Single Family should be prezoned R-8, eight dwelling units per net acre in accordance with Renton's Comprehensive Plan. This area consists of two fully developed plats, Spring Brook Acres (except for lot 9) and Hi-Park 1 st Addition, and the unincorporated portion of the Ahluwalia property. The lots range from 1/8-1/2 of an acre in siz~ and are consistent with the density requirements of the R-8 zone. The portion of the area designated Residential Low Density should be zoned R-4, four dwelling units per net acre in accordance with Renton's Comprehensive Plan. The low density area is comprised of the Talbot Estates plat, lot 9 of Spring Brook Acres, and the Anthone and Molina properties. The Talbot Estates plat has been fully developed with lots ranging from 1/6-113 of an acre and a resulting density of about five dwelling units per acre. Lot 9 of Spring Brook Acres lies along the entire southern portion of the prezone area and is dominated by sensitive areas. It is unlikely to be developed due to critical area limitations. The area of the initial Anthone annexation application (Anthone and Molina properties) contains only one dwelling unit on 4.84 acres and basically represents the only developable area to be prezoned. R-4 zoning of this property would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. _I ... ~ .. o • ~~- • ~ .. J.J7.S0 • o <" J 50 -< '" ,. KCSP "-• • , ORCH '" b b N o 98TH. AVE. s . o J40 ':3_,'_r_~· --",--__ _ \ OR"!> 3&S ------ " E 8303160820 1640220 o LANE o o ~ o '" "' , • • , • • • " ~ Ii ~ KC SP RB7705B -7B03010983 (67808100855) o -+ Co 92tl.Zl t>\ o "-r" O~ .... ... ... 0 ?,. " n '" " ... .... '" o en ... .... '" o en <D o '" en .... 1f.~To.J DI'tP. 310!, o • " o + , , ~ , • • , N \ • j '3Z -'.-' , & .\ '. "-- -:;--. -.- TR ---------- " "'-.;.. -~~:;::5.~'.<.-,b~~:~ , KCSP778102R , .:...:r. 7" , _________ "'''--0. -00 _ ... .:. W r -#05. '8 • • • ( t • • • • , 'N • • o , NO"JO-/BE .. c -I 'h. ~-., .. I~~ ~J' /00 r- =L"+::::+--------------·---------• I o ~ o :JJ '" ",;z mu> '-':"0 0..., _"_ ~; :; .... 150~ - ~' ""~'"~~E;.~9~';'-.r-- KCSP 783057 [18,40131204 • • , , 7904260842 1326.004-------·------------___ _ 1332.682 , I , r o .... '" , , • • KeN'T -R£,vro,o,/ /ilJRO .=!=. BQ ) ____ NOI-( 1 ." "-I " ~i u> -" o '" '" '" '" o '" '" ID o o 01 c·30.0i 1 ~~ " ~~ , I ~ "l-' !~\ [/55 ) 60 1 I \ > t~ , • • N"'-/~_I/"C /~. Z,7."i'I