The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA-05-143w EX Cv,~CRETE: BULkHEAD--... 11'C~· Yf.\~\11~ $~lbE~C. 3\ 0'\ 'N\ 0 I). 'M. '\ ~\~ ~ lrt. '+-\ '1'J ,--------- .5 \\t.. ~ 3 \ 0'3 --. " ~Q(A~\~~ \l\~~ ~. -CITYOFRENT;N P~o'tE.it't Wwe.· RECEIVED' . AUG 16 2006 8UILDINGDIV/SION' f\~~. \'tt\'l {\\~~~~\~i.~( 310\ t-I\~~\i\'''' \ll}..""'t f\J_ ~ ~~ l't\~\~\h'~ ~~ ~ "'\n. E.'n,,>T. ~\e~ \u.\..\V~e.." ' , .. ' ~~~c~ •. ~~,?",\~~;,\c.>\,~\"i:.~-~-c.\~\~ 'f:,...j\c,\, " ~o"'\ ~s:;\ -~~'M,O"'f.. 4lS ':>Q~\ 0' \jfr\"'-t'M: Q"~ 0",0" ~~,. \C1\Cl \1'~. ~~O?~t.\\ ~~t\~~- $ "~~l-l/5Pr~E.JL {)S.TC1-1£.~~~ 3 \ 01 /'f\(U~"~\~~\'iC.\N \W. ?L ~J '-h_ ~~I 1IIl.1 '~. ~ ~~~~~~.~~,~~ ~·,:~·~,t)~I\N.~, q8o~b· ~i:.~\O~ 1~i'r"qgc6'b . "~ t.-\\">'t: v\ 'e.~ .\~ T1\t.~i s· :>~\~ ~c.\< ~~, "" , • ~'C~. ~ilbpe..Ill\'{ l..\~'C. - 1\-\" 'l?~~' 'N-. ~ ~ \ ~ ~\ ~~ 1=\\~ ~~~~o~ CCM~~'l'~':~\~~, ?t~~L\,c.'PI~1~ ~\1'1'. ~ )...'P\\A.u..~ ~o~~v . ~\l>3h\~""~~~\t"\-\~- ~~\~:,:. 8-\$"-06 1'~,\\<.~" .. ~_\c:-/'\"" To LlJAoS-f'f 3 ~ ~i-e~ oULi'~ # tUvkJ ~'cfL " ... . ' . -~. " . ,' .... '" "05-d:Lf3 ' .. ·>".CI'Ty:'OFREN:TQ:N~· ". , .... - " " , , I"~ . , , .. Office of'the City Attorney .. ", .' '.' La)Vrcncc:J.w,arrcn '.' .. . . Kathy Keolkcr, Mayor' . < , <,' '-.' ' ,', . , . -. I~ • } ": ,.' \,' ,-", ,~' . ' .. , .. I: . " . j' ...... :, " \ .. , .. ' ", ~ .'. . :" Senior A's~isiaJltCityA~t'orncys .. " " . '.. ,Mark Harber' Za'ndta L. Fontes . . As~istant CitY Attom~ys '~ . . Ann S. NiCiscli·· Garmon· Nc\vsolll II . , .'Sliawnj:. Art:lit;r' .. {. "",' .. '< " .'. ' ".' " " -' . ~-' .'. To:' :V ~lerie:Kinast,ASs6ciate:Planner, 'Development pi~ing • ~: f'.' " 1 _ ' " , .-. " , _. , • _.' ' I:..... ...', .' .... '. : ) · ,From: ':LaWrenee l:Warren,'GityAt!Qrney :' ' ... " I' ',' .. ". " (". ','; , : '." . -',' · Date:.',!· .. · Subject:,~ :, . ·Au~st'17~ 2Q,06.-. ,:,: ::'. >.: '. ';Revok~d BuildihgPe~it' for: Dock~Rep~ir/R~pla~~lfient at '3'103 >M~~tain.·.: Vie~. Avemle,North'" ," "... . . ~... .'" .' . ~ '. . ,) : ..... ": , .. ., . ~ , .' ',' -: -...;...,;,;,;,..----....:.;,-...... --...,;;,.-----~--------..;;...;. ..... --....;.--~----.... , · J betie~e' trnii the: ~tiod takeri ~~~;propri~te~eca~se tli~' petriu~ '~as·f~ra, siritetu,re: ~~t. ~asn ~t"" '" ,the <me' being bUilt. 'In other words, tpere:was no:.pe~mif for what was ,bei,ng .1:milt: ,There is·. · im;other 'school of thdUght. based on Chelan CountY v; . Nykre1inbut thecQnsenslls of mtiDic'ipai ' : ""attorneys I ha:ve talked'to,support,niy opinion-:" '. . ': .' " ", . ,", . " ( , -: ~. r. : <. , , .' .. , ': -. .' ,' .. \ .. : ...... LJW:tmj. · ec: : .... Jay Covington ' ... Larry Meckling .' NeilWatts > "'." 't "',. : "Gregg A Zimrn~rniari, PE ., • • .• -,t ,'. ';" . '. -.. " ,',;- ' .. . " I,', • ~ I ' .., , .,!. , '. ' ....... ~' .. , .' " , . < ' ;" . , ~, " . " ' . ~.:.., ' . .. ',~ . ~ .. r ,", ';." , .; ' .. " ',\, ~" , I:. .~' . 'i :," -;, .... - ,.' , .... ' "." . \. .. , ,~ , " , '~ . '\ , ~ ". . " '''', , :'~""., .. "':"'~' '," ,J'o" om" OOX 626 'R'oIO", IV "hii'glm; 9~057' (425) 25~-86,78 I FAX (425 )255,54 7~' R If N'T 0 N " ' .' ." " '" '.' .:. . "." '. ", ,AHJ!:AD OF T.HE CURVE '" .. ' , • , ': ' i ® ~~i~ paper C~lnt~ins 50% ,reCYCled m~teria",~o%pom CQnsuriler' , . AJ>JA c r", f'ltd~. ttl,.l,Jt~ -tTo,Jt~A,J I ~Ilt 'AM ~ liT I r1;1f ,J1A I,J "fP.}· . ""v. ,J •. \ + \ i 1/(1 CITYOFRENTON RECEIVED :;6 BUILDING DIVI ON. l.A~~ i-J,..& ~ ,tI <4T',J ;"[7l IN::LAKE WASHINGTON i. ILr~,J COUNtY OF: kING STATE: WASHINGTON APPL BY: r1C~~ArJ, tA IfPyt. ~ ,..., PAGE:"" OF '" DAlE: .;/ .. /~, d.r FILE CITY OF RENTON RECEIVED IN CLERK'S OFFICE i ,I" 1 4 2006 COURT Of APPEALS r <.,j STAll OF W~t«NGTON-DMSION I -- om A~~ •• 1 .. 0 . .199J.~~!LDING DIVISION -;J;~.~ ....... _ ...... CHIEF JUDGE IN THE COURT OF-APPEALS OF T~E STATE OF WASHmGTON BRUCE MILLER and PAM MILLER, husband and wife, Respondents, v. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) O. LOWELL ANDERSON and LAURIE) L. BAKER, husband and wife, ) Appellants. and MERLE E. SHAW and DORIS C. SHAW, husband and wife, Third-Party Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ------------------------) No. 39448-7-1 DIVISION ONE PUBLISHED OPINION FILED: AUB 1 0 1998 ELLINGTON, J. --This case involves a dispute over the boundary between two adjacent parcels of property bordering Lake Washington, and requires ~s to examine the doctrine of adverse possession in the coniext of permissive use and sUCCes~o(S in title. Summary Merle and Doris Shaw (the Shaws), owners of the north lot, and Ernest Tuttle, owner of the south lot, recognized that the fence between their lots diverged from the platted line such that Mr. Tuttle was using the Shaws' property. In 1968, they entered into and recorded a formal agreement, accepting the platted line as thejru&boundary. --:.-,,;- .• :3,- No. 39448-7-112 The Shaws did not move the fence, however, and allowed Mr. Tuttle and subsequent owners of the south lot to continue to use their property on the south side of the fence. In 1973, Mr. Tuttle sold the south lot to David and Marcella Clark (the Clarks); they in turn sold in 1986 to Bruce and Pam Miller (the Millers). The Shaws owneJth~ north lot until 1986, when they sold to O. Lowell Anderson and Laurie Baker (Anderson/Baker). After Anderson/Baker had a survey done in 1991, a dispute over the true property line arose between Anderson/Baker and the Millers. The trial court quieted title in the Millers on a theory of adverse possession, concluding that Mr. Tuttle's use was permissive, but that permission was revoked as a matter of law upon Mr. Tuttle's 1973 sale to the Clarks, and that Anderson/Baker failed to prove that the Clarks' or the Millers' use was permissive. We reverse. Use that is permissive at its inception is presumed to remain permissive unless proof exists of (1) a change in use beyond that permitted, providing notice of hostility to the true owner, or (2) the sale of the 'servient estate. Mr. Tuttle's sale of his property did not automatically terminate.the permissive use, and did not shift the burden to Anderson/Baker to prove continued permission. The permissive use did not end by operation of law until the Shaws' 1986 sale of the servient estate to Anderson/Baker. The Millers had the burden to prove that the permissive use in fact ended sooner. They presented no evidence to satisfy this burden, and thus failed to establish adverse use for the statutory period. We therefore remand for the court to quiet title in Anderson/Baker. 2 .. .•• -V .' - .;.- " No. 39448-7-1/3 Facts 1 When Merle and Doris Shaw purchased the north lot in 1951. it was fenced on its south side from the street to the lake. In the late 1960s, the Shaws realized that the correct boundary was south of the original fence. No formal survey was d~e.; In 1968. the Shaws and Ernest Tuttle entered into and recorded a boundary line agreement, accepting the platted line as the boundary between their properties. But the Shaws did not want to move the fence, and permitted Mr. Tuttle to continue to maintain the property up to the fence. Mr. Tuttle's use of the property was essentially border landscaping. In 1973, Mr. Tuttle sold the south lot to David and Marcella Clark. Like Mr. Tuttle, the Clarks landscaped and otherwise used the property up to the original fence, except that the Shaws trimmed one hedge on both sides along part of the fence. In 1986, Bruce and Pam Miller purchased the south lot from the Clarks, and Lowell Anderson and Laurie Baker purchased the north lot from the Shaws. Like Mr. Tuttle and the Clarks. the Millers used the property up to the original fence. 1 The trial court's findings are unchallenged: therefore, they are verities on appeal. Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. Bosley, 118 Wn.2d 801, 808. 828 P.2d 549 (1992). Some of . the findings are in the court's conclusions. but we examine them for what they are regardless of their label. See Willener v. Sweeting, 107 Wn.2d 388, 394. 730 P.2d 45 (1986) (appellate court reviews erroneously designated findings and conclusions for what they are). The Millers challenge the finding that Tuttle's use was permissive, but we do not consider that issue because they failed to cross-appeal it. See RAP 5.1 (party seeking appellate review must file notice of appeal). Nor do we accept the Millers' invitation to examine parts of Mr. Shaw's deposition not presented to the trial court. See Diox~n/Organochlorine CtL v. Department .of Ecolog~, 119 Wn.2d 761, 771. 837 P.2d 1007 (1992) (reviewing court only considers evidence admitted by trial court). _.-1 =- -"';.-z-- 3 No. 39448-7-1/4 Anderson/Baker had the property surveyed in 1991. The survey indicated that the correct platted line for their lot lies south of the fence line by 3.5 feet on the east near the road and by 6.5 feet on the west near the lake. They told the Millers they -, planned to build a fence on that line. --. In 1994, the Millers sued to quiet title, claiming adverse possession of the land up to the original fence based upon the exclusive use of the disputed area by them and their predecessors. Anderson/Baker denied any exclusive use, arguing that (1) the recorded 1968 boundary line agreement established the boundary, (2) any use by. the Millers or their predecessors was permissive, and (3) any adverse use was not for the 10-year statutory period required for adverse possession. Anderson/Baker asked the court to quiet title in them? The trial court fourid that Mr. Tuttle's use was permissive, but concluded the permission ~ranted by the Shaws to Mr. Tuttle was revoked as a matter of law when Mr. Tuttle conveyed his property. The court found that Mr. Tuttle's successors in interest, the Clarks, landscaped the property to the fence line, and that their use was exclusive, uninterrupted, open, n~torious, and hostile for ~he statutory 10-year period. The court found that "[I]ittle evidence exists on the issue of permissive use after Tuttle conveyed . . . to the Clarks although an inference does exist that such use might have been permissive[.]" but concluded that Anderson/Baker failed to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that this use was permissive, and quieted title in the Millers. 2 Anderson also brought a third party claim against the Shaws for breach of the 1986 statutory warranty deed. The court bifurcated the trial on the claim against the ~aWs .. ---'~ 4 , .. . . ;.-: -, o . . No. 39448-7-1/5 Adverse Possession) The doctrine of adverse possession arose "to assure maximum utilization of the land, encourage the rejection of stale claims, and quiet titles." Roy v. Cunningham, 46 Wn. App. 409, 412, 731 P.2d 526 (1986) (citing Chaplin v. Sanders, 1~n.2d 853, 859-60, 676 P.2d 431 (1984) (citing 7 Richard R. Powell, Powell on Real Property ~ 1012[3] (1982))), review denied, 108 Wn.2d 1018 (1987); see also William B. Stoebuck, The Law of Adverse Possession in Washington, 35 Wash. L. Rev. 53, 53 (1960). But courts will not permit "theft" of property by adverse possession unless the owner had notice and an opportunity to assert his or her right. See 7 Richard R. Powell & Patrick J. Rohan, Powell on Real Property 111012[3], at 91-12 (Lori A. Hauser edt 1991). Thus, no .presumption exists in favor of the adverse holder because "possession will be presumed to be in subordination to the title of the true owner." Muench V. Oxley, 90 Wn.2d 637, 642, 584 P.2d 939 (1978), overruled on other grounds in Chaplin, 100 Wn.2d at·861 n.2. Adverse possession requires proof of 10 years' possession that was (1) exclusive, (2) actual and uninterrupted, (3) open and notorious, and (4) hostile. RCW 4.16.020;. ITT Rayonier. Inc. v. Bell, 112 Wn.2d 754, 757, 774 P.2d 6 (1989) (citing Chaplin, 100 Wn.2d at 857). The 10-year period may be shown by tacking a 3 The parties focus their arguments on the impact of the 1968 boundary line .agreement. In an attempt to ~xplain t.h~impact of that agreement. the parties cite cases applying other theories of resolving boundary disputes; however, none of these theories is relevant to our resolution of this case because the trial court was only asked to consider adverse possession. See Lamm v. McTighe, 72 Wn.2d 587,591.434 P.2d 565 (1967) (listing boundary theories: (1) adverse possession, (2) parol agreement between adjoining landowners, (3) estoppel in pais, (4) location by common grantor. (5) mutual recognitiQn and acql)iescen~); see also William B. Stoebuck, 17 WASH. PRAC., Real Estate: Property Law § 8.21, p. 519-20 (1995)..1 1:. ----:.~-- 5 No. 39448-7-116 predecessor's adverse use if privity exists between them, and they have held continuously and adversely to the title holder. Roy, 46 Wn. App. at 413-14. Because the holder of legal title is presumed to possess the property, the party claiming adverse possession bears the burden of proof on each element. ITT Rayonier,112=Wn.2d at 757-58. Adverse possession is a mixed question of law and fact: whether the necessary facts exist is for the trier of fact. but whether those facts constitute adverse possession is an issue of law for the court to decide. Chaplin, 100 Wn.2d at 863; Anderson v. Hudak, 80 Wn. App. 398, 401-02, 907 P.2d 305 (1995). "Whether use is adverse or permissive is a question of fact: Miller v. Jarman, 2 Wn. App. 994, 997,471 P.2d 704 (citing Northwest Cities Gas Co. v. Western Fuel Co., 13 Wn.2d 75, 84, 123 P.2d 771 (1942», review denied. 78 Wn.2d 995'(1970). Permission This case requires examination of the impact of permission on the hostility element of adverse possession. Generally, the hostility element requires proof that the possessor treated the property as an owner WOUld. Chaplin, 100 Wn.2d at 860-61. But upermission to occupy the land, given by the true title owner to the claimant or his predecessors in interest, will still operate to negate the element of hostility." Chaplin, 100 Wn.2d at 861-62. This qualification means that "a different set of rules applies when the initial use is permissive. n Granston v. Callahan, 52 Wn. App. 288,' 293, 759 P.2d 462 (1988) (applying Chaplin analysis to claim of prescriptive easement). Hostility does not mean personal animosity or even adversarial intent. It connotes: rather that 6 -.-=--. . -.' ~ _. 'I .. No. 39448-7~1/7 the claimant's use has been hostile to the title owner's, in that the claimant's use has been that of an owner. See Chaplin, 100 Wn. 2d at 857-58. Use with the true owner's permission thus cannot be use hostile to the true owner's title. Permission can be express or implied; an inference of permissiv:e use arises when it is reasonable to assume "that the use was permitted by sufferance and acquiescence." Granston, 52 Wn. App. at 294. The 1968 boundary agreement between Mr. Tuttle and the Shaws does not contain an express grant of permission to Mr. Tuttle to use the disputed area. In context, however, the agreement. Mr. Shaw's testimony, and other evidence in the record establish that the Shaws gave at least implied (and perhaps express) permission to Mr. Tuttle to use the disputed area. The trial court so found, and the Millers have not cross appealed this finding. The question then is whether any subsequent act terminated permission such that a hostile use arose. Generally, the party claiming adverse possession bears the burden of proving that permission terminated either because (1) the claimant has asserted a hostile right, or (2) the servient estate has changed hands through death or alienation. Granston, 52 Wn. App. at 294-95; see also Ormiston v. Boast, 68 Wn.2d 548, 551, 413 P.2d 969 (1966) (permissive use cannot ripen into prescriptive use unless distinct change in use provides notice to owner). Because permission is personal to the grantor and cannot extend beyond that person's ownership, the relevant viewpoint for determining when permissive use terminates is that of the party granting the permission. See Granston, 52 Wn. App. at 295. 7 .' Parcel Viewer One Parcel Found: .. . .... 'Im;~:l~;~ .'. mm .. A d (I r ass !I~~~~:~;~~.~···· ~~~~!.~~~~~I~ ...... _ AsemChMenu 1 Parcels Found: Reoord 1 Paroel Number Address 3342103895 3101 MOUNTAIN VIEW AVN A Search Menu 1 Parcel s Found: Record 1 Paroel Number Address 3342103890 3103 MOUNTAIN VIEW AVN ).24056666 Zipcode 98056 '~(CJ~~~£~I~ Zoom In Zoom Out Full Map Zoom In Zoom Out Full Map CITY OF RENTON PLANNING / BUILDING / PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM Date: April 26, 2006 To: City Clerk's Office From: Stacy Tucker Subject: Land Use File Closeout Please complete the following information to facilitate project closeout and indexing by the City Clerk's Office. Project Name: LUA (file) Number: Cross-References: AKA's: Project Manager: Acceptance Date: Applicant: Owner: Contact: PID Number: ERC Decision Date: ERC Appeal Date: Administrative Approval: Appeal Period Ends: Public Hearing Date: Date Appealed to HEX: By Whom: HEX Decision: Date Appealed to Council: By Whom: Council Decision: Mylar Recording Number: Morgan Pier Repair LUA-05-143, SME Valerie Kinast December 13, 2005 Michael Magnussen, Seaborn Pile Driving Co. Jim & Laura Morgan Michael Magnussen, Seaborn Pile Driving Co. 3342103895 December 30, 2005 January 13, 2006 Date: Date: Project Description: Repair of existing dock at single-family residence on Lake Washington. Existing piles would remain and pile caps, stringers and decking would be replaced. The dock. consists of a 6 ft. by 59 ft. pier, a 20 ft. by 19 ft. 6 inch offshore deck and a 20 ft. by 31 ft. ramp. The ramp would be raised out of the water up to a level higher than the ordinary high water mark, as required by Washington Department of Fisheries and Wildlife. Location: 3103 Mountainview Avenue N Comments: CITY OF RENTON CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION FROM SHQRELINE,SUBSTANmIAL DEVElOPMENT PERMIT EXEMPTION FILE NO.: PROJECT NAME: OWNER/APPLICANT: PROJECT MANAGER: PROPOSAL: PROJECT LOCATION: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SEC-TWN-R: WATER BODYIWETLAND: ",,,,c, December 30, 2005 LUA-05-143, SME Morgan Pier Repair Shoreline Exemption Laura and Jim Morgan 3103 Mountainview Ave N Renton, WA 98056 Valerie Kinast, Associate Planner The applicants are proposing to repair an existing pier and dock at their single-family residence on Lake Washington. Existing piles would remain and pile caps, stringers and decking would be replaced. The dock consists of a 6 ft. by 59 ft. pier, a 20 ft. by 19.5 ft. offshore deck and a 20 ft. by 31 ft. ramp. The ramp would be raised out of the water up to a level higher than the ordinary high water mark, as required by Washington Department of Fisheries and Wildlife. The subject site is located within the Urban Shoreline Environment. 3103 Mountainview Ave N Lots 56-58 in Block A of C. D. Hillman's Lake Washington Garden of Eden No. 1 & additional land, as described in Attachment A SE ~ 31-24-5 Lake Washington An exemption from a Shoreline Management SUbstantial Development Permit is hereby granted for the proposed project pursuant to Chapter 173-27-040 (2)(b) WAC: "Normal maintenance or repair of existing structures or developments, including damage by accident, fire or elements. "Normal maintenance" includes those usual acts to prevent a decline, lapse, or cessation from a lawfully established condition. "Normal repair" means to restore a development to a state comparable to its original condition, including but not limited to its size, shape, configuration, location and external appearance, within a reasonable period after decay or partial destruction, except where repair causes substantial adverse effects to shoreline resource or environment. Replacement of a structure or development may be authorized as repair where such replacement is the common method of repair for the type of structure or development and the replacement Exemption from Shoreline Management.doc structure or development is comparable to the original structure or development including but not limited to its size, shape, configuration, location and external appearance and the replacement does not cause substantial adverse effects to shoreline resources or environment." The granting of the shoreline exemption is not intended to serve as an approval of the submitted plan for construction of the pier and dock. The applicant will be required to submit for a building permit for the project. Please include a copy of this Shoreline Exemption with building permit submittals. The proposed development is consistent or inconsistent with: CONSISTENT INCONSISTENT xx Policies of the Shoreline Management Act. N/A The guidelines of the Department of Ecology where no Master Program has been finally approved or adapted by the Department. xx The Master Program. Neil Watts, Director Development Services Division Attachments: Legal Description Vicinity Map Site Plan cc: Owner/Applicant File Exemption from Shoreline Management.doc S1240S6666 Lake Washington Parcel Number Address Zipcode Taxpayer 3l4~!!a.""--J 3342103890 3103 MOUNTAIN VIEW AV N 98056 MORGAN LAURA S+JAMES C SE 31 245 MORGAN LAURA S+JAMES C 334210389006 VICINITY MAP INO SCALE LEGAL DESCRIPTlON lAKE FOREST PARK JUANITA RENTON 56-57-58 A HILLMA,NS LK WN GARDEN OF EDEN # 1 & 2ND CL SH LOS ADJ LESS POR L Y S OF LN OAF BEG AT INTX OF S LN OF'LOT 58 WITH MDR LN TH S 80·13-02 W 42.78 FT TH N 72-03-18 W 99.44 FT TH S 89-50-57 W 190.56 FT TO INNER HARBOR LN TH N 23-40-00 E ALG SO HARBOR LN 52.76 FT TO TPOB TH N 89-50-57 E 219.38 FT TH S 75-24-20 E 83.14 FT TH S 61-50-30 E 22.86 FT TH N 89-50-57 E TO TERMINUS AT ELY LN OF BLK A TGW POR OF 2ND CL SH LOS AOJ LOT 58 OAF BEG AT INTX OF S LN OF LOT 58 WITH MOR LN TH S 80·13-02 W 42.78 FT TH S 00-35-34 W 6.33 FT TH N 72-09-29 E 44.37 'FTTO BEG VICINITY MAP NO SCALE PURPOSE: MA l,Jr: pc r ... I1~.!" 1P 't }(,/~;fi,Jc, r Ir ~ DATUM: C.O.E. 0,0' E!:)T. 1 9 19 ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: SEE SHEET #2 , 'Seabom Pile Driving Company~ , 3 '! ;..: :; ~-~~ ..:~~ ~ .2.01 r-' ~ ?.: t \" I:!.' ,I ;:. ""~ ;' -; t" ., 0 _,,\~ •• :JI. ,,'~t"o "11,/ 2!" -2700 f ....... JOB NAME: t1.,./=I-G;,\,J, LAu P--1 J J /11 MAIL ADD: :31 G' 3 Moll iJ-p.. /rJ, ", p,J , .... ", i.J, SITE ADD: ~f~,.J. LfA' 'J~c~c, oS.1 1"/1' : r-/oA ,,In,JA'''~t p~r"I/P.r -r; r;<..I:;;;II~ fir,..; H t ... ,A /r E';<.I:.",JGl Po,. ,.,/P I' (/oJ[ t1f/h},..-/. IN: LAKE WASHINGTON AT: 'fl,.i~'''fJ COUN1Y OF: KING STATE: WASHINGTON APPL BY: ,',-,"' <:,:,4 ,.1, ~,.;'! ,1;,.1 ~ ; :r-! PAGE: 1 OF DATE: ,0 ~o C' ~ ..4 td"" c r ,J, f' ltd ~ . (fJ-JrJr~ -s-To ,J ~ t1.A,J , _,,,j It l I "" H ~ /0' I r1Q11 ,J'.A I,.J "/r h' Av'. ,.I. \ fit F -r; ~r Rt\:1>II/L, £,C/l a ~o i ; i '-.. roc l A I? 1-w""~~ ltictr",J /O'r AtJ I>tP.E:Q~, LOI.J! LL ~I07 /"'~l/,Jr;.'rJ "/t;d /1v' ri, IN:,LAI<E WASHINGTON :. ~ r ,.If.-,J COUNTY OF: KING STATE: WASHINGTON APPl ,BY: r1c,P.G,~f'I, lA ~Pr· ~ J 1-1 PAGE: ~ OF 1-DATE: .. ,Ie / ZO cJ S' , ) -.' ! , r.'~ ~I 'f. - - -~t-- - - - - - - - - - - - @ ( N 8'75O'5r e ) ~aMwIad __ 412.~5' (C) 2/9.3/' i L ;:. L,~f!'fl .. , ... ~~~~,~;,~~r-i~lfit"i,.,·;}~;t;;:i~~~f.~~J:!;;lt~ .. · Set SaN BBnl &11ft w/Wo (.EA ',. City of Re •.• <Jn Department of Planning / Building / Public ~. ~. ks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS DUE: DECEMBER 28, 2005 APPLICATION NO: LUA05-143, SME DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBER 13, 2005 APPLICANT: Michael Ma nussen PROJECT MANAGER: Valerie Kinast CITY OF RENTON PLAN REVIEW: Jan lilian SITE AREA: 9,275 s uare feet uare feet LOCATION: 3103 Mountain View Ave N BUILDING DIVISION I SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Repair of existing dock at single-family residence on Lake Washington. Existing piles would remain and pile caps, stringers and decking would be replaced. The dock consists of a 6 ft. by 59 ft. pier, a 20 ft. by 19 ft. 6 inch offshore deck and a 20 ft. by 31 ft. ramp. The ramp would be raised out of the water up to a level higher than the ordinary high water mark, as required by Washington Department of Fisheries and Wildlife. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non.Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More EnvIronment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major InformatIon Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals TransDortation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLlCY·RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE·RELA TED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise imd have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Date .. ., City of Re ••• on Department of Planning / Building / Public ~. _. ks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS DUE: DECEMBER 28, 2005 APPLICATION NO: LUA05-143, SME DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBER 13,2005 APPLICANT: Michael Ma nussen PROJECT MANAGER: Valerie Kinast SITE AREA: 9,275 s uare feet BUILDING AREA ·'l"" p;"" LOCATION: 3103 Mountain View Ave N WORK ORDER NO: 77510 ";·.~~~'I'.) y' " SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Repair of existing dock at single-family residence on Lake Washington. Existing piles would re~~Iri'<ancJ pile caps, stringers and decking would be replaced. The dock consists of a 6 ft. by 59 ft. pier, a 20 ft. by 19 ft. 6 inch offshore de-a< and a 20 ft. by 31 ft. ramp. The ramp would be raised out of the water up to a level higher than the ordinary high water mark, as required by Washington Department of Fisheries and Wildlife. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation LandlShoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energyl Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10.000 Feet 14.000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional info~ tion is neede to properly assess this proposal. Date r I .' . (. .. Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor . -" December 13, 2005 Michael Magnussen Seaborn Pile Driving Co.' 9311' SE 36th #204 Mercer Island, WA 98040' .' Subject: . Morgan Pier R~pair LUA05:-143, SME . . Dear Mr. Magnussen: ". .: C·ITV.REN·TON PlanningiBuildingIPUbiic Works Department . . Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Adniinistrator 'TheDevelopment Plannirig . .5edion:of the City df~ HeRton has' determin'ed" that the subject application is compjete::a~cording to submittal. requirements and, therefore; is accepted for review. .....~ ." " . ,'. -,' , " ',' . . You. will be notified if an'y additional information is ,required' t6 continue . pr~cessing your application. .' .',.' '. . . . . . . . Please contact me at (425)430:.7289 if YOLi have~nyque~tions. • • • • • r • • '! .- . Sinc'erely, "', tI •• ," ...... ,.; .• ' WvY1t~ Valerie Kinast Asso~iafe Planner' cc:Jim & Laura Morgan'JDwn~r '. . ~. . , " ~ . ;:':, .", " . ~ .. .. " .,...,.;----:--.....,..---1-O-5-5-S-ou-th-G-ra-d-y-W-a-+;~~R-e-ti..;.;.to-n...,..;W;...,.·-'-as-h-in-g-to-n-9-8-05-5---~--"'-···~ .• ••••• '® 'Th;S pap~~ oo~tai~s 50o/;~cled material. 30% post consum,er AHEA-D OF THE' CURVE' City of Renton c:~-'~!.9PMEi\ir PLANNING LAND USEPER,MIT ,'YOFRENTON NOV 292005 MASTER APPLICATIONECEIVED , PROPERTY OWNER(S) PROJECT INFORMATION NAME: ~1'1 f ~A/;(P-A rid' p<q .If ,J PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: Mo~GA ,J f Itp-PF~~ ILb ADDRESS: 1pL/~]A I~ J/~w 310"j AV. , ,rJ; , CITY: ~vrJfOrJ ' ZIP: ' ',"tv/l, 9g0s t. , ' , PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION AND ZIP CODE: 3{03 tiot/;iF'/ vle~ -"IV. ,J, . Rt~rJ!rJA9BO s£ TELEPHONE NUMBER: 9'26'· 2"1 J_ ~ '.5' $oj " APPLICANT (if other than owner) KING COUNTYASSESSOR~S ACCOUNt NUMBER(S): "5 sf '"2,/cJ J g ~5efo NAME: t1 Ie-#-4f t t1''''~Nt,f S(Sr ~ EXISTING LAND USE(S): ' (/liJ'rJJhrJn'alv COMPANY (ifapplicable): ' " ~t A~~r',' p It ~ PFtl-J';,J G '~. PROPOSED LANDUSE(S): /. ADDRESS: 4f20{ , '311 S~ 6b1if EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE trNMAP DESIGNATION: , "SP, , ' , """"', C1TYri t ~C.f P-1st/< ,J J) ZIP: 960 i a TELEPHONE NUMBER ZC:>, • 23'_ IreD PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION' (if applicable): '/ " EXISTING tONING: 'R-Jb CONTACT PERSON PROPOSED ZONiNG (if applicable): ./ NAME: 8,A-rf! ..q.~ .A r P l,c.l',Jf' SITE AREA (in square feet): 9 ~ 27 .$' ¢ SQUARE FOOTAGE OFPUBUCROADWAYS TO BE COMPANY (if applicable): DEDICATED: / SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENTS: ADDRESS: / PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET CITY: ZIP: ACRE (if applicable): / NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable): / TELEPHONE NUMBER AND E·MAIL ADDRESS: MT t1--1<2! rJ Lf s; ~t,J Q) fV1s ~ .~" NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if apPlicableY Q:web/pw/devserv/forms/planninglmasterapp.doc 07129/05 PROJECT INFORMATION continued NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): t SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOS~IDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): . SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGSTO REMAIN (if applicable): ""-.. SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED ~-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable):.' • SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILQINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): " NET FLOOR AREA OF NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable) : "'- NUMBEROF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BYTHE NEW PROJECT (if applicable):, r---~--------~----------~----~ PROJECT VALUE: IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): a AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA ONE a AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA TWO a FLOOD HAZARD AREA a GEOLOGIC HAZARD ___ sq. ft .. ___ sq.ft. ___ sq.ft. TREAMS AND LAKES sq. ft .. _ _.__-sq. ft. . ! .LEGALDESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY '.' • (Attach iegal description on separate sheet with thefoUowlnglnformation included) . SITUATEIN THE' ~ r QUARTER OF SECTION3/,TOWNSHIP':lf, RANGE .. ~.~ IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON. . . TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES List all land use applications being applied for: 1 .. JJh~' ~Irv ~() . 3. 2. 4. Staff will calc~lateapplicable fees. and. postage:' $ . / AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP ~;::;~::ii.::;;;::~'--'--lt:=.;;:-::.tiw:t1~..q-;.:;:·;::G~rJ;;;(/;;;h,;~·t'i~::" :::.; ~eclare that I am (please check one) _ the current owrierof .the property . eauthorized representative. to act fOra corporation (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing and theinfonnation herewith are in aU respects true and correct to the bas). of m ~npwled~e a~belief. '. 7"--"--I certify thatlknow orhave satisfactory evidence that J , veh...li.f I fi'lt . p,,,, _----;;itl" IfIQd this instrument and acknOwledged It to be hislherltheir free and volunta act for the __ -ft~~rH-~ __ --"18eS and purposes mentioned in theinstrumenl _~~~~~~L-~~~____ ~ (Sig (Signature of Owner/Representative) Q:weblpw/devserv/formslplanninglmasterapp.doc CHARLES F. KOKKO ~ /\ J I, NOTARY PUBLIC -----'~~~-. ..:...-...; 'r ~~~I.l-----I' STATE OF WASHINGTON Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary (Print) C~YkS r I~ It/b My appointment eXPires: __ ~-+(...:.(_~.:....~,--{) _6 ___ _ 2 COMMISSION EXPIRES MARCH 19, 2006 07/29/05 D€Vg}OPMENI P . Ty OF f1€rJ~~NINQ \ " DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS NOV 29 2005 FOR LAND USE APPLiCATIONS RECEIVED ess: Applicant Agreement Statement 2 AND 3 Inventory of Existing Sites 2 3 Lease Agreement. Map of Existing Site Conditions 2 AND 3 Map of View Area 2 AND 3 Photosimulations 2 AND 3 This requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services Section 2. Public Works Plan Review Section . PROJECT NAME: ~4r1 !J:Jc;Ic..-f<.eprur 3. Building Section DATE: __________ ~ ________ ----- 4. Development Planning Section Q:\WEB\Pw\DEVSERv\Forms\Plannino\waiver.xls n7I?A/?005 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS This requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services Section PROJECT NAME: 2. Public Works Plan Review Section 3. Building Section 4. Development Planning Section Q:\WEB\Pw\OEVSERv\Forms\Planninq\waiver.xls '- 07/29/2005 DEVELOPMENT PL;NNlh'G ClTY OF RENTm,! NOV 29 2005 RECEIVED , I ~ f P p. 0 Po s t To ~ f P A ,~ 1If f f ~ \ S It N ~ f I ~ y:L) W ~ I C/# Is? )( s '9 > ~lrij .1\ OFFfffOp-r Dfc..~ ISfCTiOrJ 1ifAI Is '2-0' w/br ~I /9" 'I ~o,J<4. /Htp-r Is 'ALs-o A 20 t-Jfbr.x "3/' LoNG R--1Mf lifAT f>< IF rJDS'" I rJ'/o 1TIt hJ.-1 Tf r<-To 1*t l-"1 ~ f e. f PI i-J HI uH W f wit l p.AIIS'[ A8~vf Tift Of-D/,JAr-y ~14l/ WAlff r1.AP~ WI"'1Hr P-ffT "f 1i{f PI f p.. 1P MA It-~ CON ~ (P-rl' N <4 t-J ITff W b f: hJ P-fQd fA-trlf;J,II" . ~lr t,jo(l-\(. t-JltL Bf fl£,,JG f>LAG-{ AT Tilt MOP.G.Af'J P-f>S'/DFNG( -4( "310'3 MdU ISf"-l'/ N v If W A v' . N.. WdP-j(. vJ (it ~t Col"'1 P i ~TfD UPO~ ~fcAJP-I,J~ A~l PfPrlf,J', P.tPAlft~ To Ttk P/!« wiLl Co,J~fr-f OF ,.JfW ~ILf CAP.), ~T(-t(NGifP-S' AtJD Dt-~~,,,,c;. TIft tx/lS'TlrJ<i P It ~ swill P. frlA IN I AJ' 1ifry APt /,J ~dO' D COrJ P r n ori. c.o.J<S'Tp Uc...T/O,J CO'S'T hJ I ~l I?>t ~ f fp.O'!-lrl~Tfi 'Y i It-, 000 /0 120/ COO I ~/I L 'G /L-~ -S' -'7 D-"I'(s 10 Cot1f ~ ~Ii. hi Op.~ .,j I Lt F j£ ~ f l~ c-t aVe {<- LA n w .... u-HI'!,. T" ri. oS-iTt Ie-usr P -"I.i' oS-IN" L r -f A nit Y, o-J 1/ I" II I-J Itt A.l~o A P~L '( To 'lir plrf{ i liflf Wop..j( Is-~t/,JG DC),Jt ,,..1 (Jf<.P~ ft ~ MA f rJrA I ~ ,A,.J fX I slt,J ~ (V t< I J;1fF. F f f (J... • . '.' M( offA\t [ HA.<5,JL/S'l!St,J .sEA~ p. ~ f ( Lt b~f v I ,J~ Ct) 3124056666 Parcel Number Address Zipcode Taxpayer 3342103890 3103 MOUNTAIN VIEW AV N 98056 MORGAN LAURA S+JAMES C SE 31 245 MORGAN LAURA S+JAMES C 334210389006 VICINITY MAP INO SCALE LEGAL DESCRIPTLON LAKE FOREST PARK JUANITA RENTON 56-57-58 A HILLMA,NS LK WN GARDEN OF EDEN # 1 & 2ND CL SH LOS AOJ LESS POR L Y S OF LN OAF BEG AT INTX OF 5 LN OF· LOT 58 WITH MOR LN TH S 80-13-02 W 42.78 FT TH N 72-03-18 W 99.44 FT TH S 89-50-57 W 190.56 FT TO INNER HARBOR LN TH N 23-40-00 E ALG SO HARBOR LN 52.76 FT TO TPOB TH N 89-50-57 E 219.38 FT TH S 75-24-20 E 83.14 FT TH S 61-50-30 E 22.86 FT TH N 89-50-57 E TO TERMINUS A T ELY LN OF BLK A TGW POR OF 2ND CL SH LOS AOJ LOT 58 OAF BEG AT INTX OF S LN OF LOT 58 WITH MOR LN TH S 80-13-02 W 42.78 FT TH S 00-35-34 W 6.33 FT TH N 72-09-29 E 44.37 ·FTTO BEG VICINITY MAP NO SCALE PURPOSE: MAl,.)" Fa r"'I~.!" Tu -txlsfi..s~ i'I<F;. DATUM: C.O.E. 0,0' E~T. 1 9 19 ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: SEE SHEET #2 . . Seabom Pile Driving Company® , 3 'I :;.:-:; ~-~" "T. ~ 2-0,/ f";-? C t. ~.. , = ~ ,~,.I ::; I ',' ... ..1 ~;: r.10 .,~"_<:'.(~-I·.;ro "11./ 22"-2700 F~" JOB NAME: t1..-/=lcQ/\,J, LAtl~ ~ Jwl MAIL ADO: :3103 r1of);J1Ar,J. "'pJ . ......". iJ. SITE ADO: I<E'~,.J, I..L~. '7 'C c~ ~ oS ,1 ,...,1' o .: ,-/.--1 /,J-n·,J ANe-it p~r/I/P'" Td rx/-=Ii,.<; fir,.. i ~ L ~ ... A /1" . E";' /~TI,..,G F<A I"'/p " d-'t c1!1hi. IN: LAKE WASHINGTON AT: . ft,JT~rJ COUNTY OF: KING STATE: WASHINGTON APPL BY: ,. t,_~ ... G.~ ,.1, ~._ ./ P . .! 4 i :r-! PAGE: 1 OF DATE: /0 ·~o C'.t' -.. -." Al>JACrtlT f'/ldr. Cl,..lrJt~ ~ To ,J f r1 A.,J I "'" w ILl fA t1 ~ 117 1 nUll ,.ITA I,.J "Ir hi Av'. ,.1, " t /f7r l.Af?~ W A. G.. HI tJ CiT!? ,J /t7l fiEF -r; ~t k.nHI/ L-r , A,J J>tp.Gdt-i, Low! LL :l 10 1 f"k 1/ ,.J ~ 'rJ "/tw /1,,1 rJ. 11!f~GAN, JA """ts'J L~ II r A :1 '.173 ~Ierl.f ,.J}<t lri .J It w ·,A.v. JJ ·/'2.r~r/,.J / hl/l 9Sos C IN:~.LAKE WASHINGTON I I ~C;4 Lt Y;o :. ~r ,..lfe.,J i I 1<1 ~" I 3d i 'It:1 COUNTY OF: KING' STATE: WASHINGTON APPl BY: r1C~~A,.J, tA Qf)1. 4 J 1"1 PAGE:.2. OF 'f. DATE: .. :/e /20 rJ.s- \\-::: Pf;1.d r.osf r:..s~~I~t ~At11' "''''''J .1,..,1'1 t::-_ -:-- - - -...... 311 j 'f Ii II, ,0 ~"'lsll"'4 R .... r1r 18 t ... ,..tptv sc...,. L ~: r/ ;J.. 0 I -r--I o 10 2-() $0 10 rn-r ~ Ib~ '" If W (yu) ~r1 F S(c/rtt,J' ~t Low pH.,.Jt1 eTC-bt ~ I~rp 1 ~.Jt l '.4/ FrsT or ~cfc ) b'/$r. R'fptv-ul IV' f>tA~ ~f ~'ptH' vA,J0PY ..J/ H-(t>~lItl~ f30AI LIr(1O p-.l"M.A IN IlrJrfl.. Oot/C;, f'P.~ , PIL~ s ./..~"'" .. -"-' "~rdStp~ t1A'rJIr,.JArJ'~ p.tr""Ip-s jQ t)(I.s17,.J~ Pft·p.., t Lt VAl(. 1:,)< I,fT''''~ ~~r1t" I / o"f p.. O~w'1 ".J,: l", ~f WAO ~,,JGsTetrJ ~p.trlforJ ~ JAr1fS ~ ~AtlP.A M'P-G"" N ' • " .! 10 3 MdU ,J,A ,,.J ",f.,J A..t. rJ I , "'~ ,..lflf,J :7S(JS(, ',,,~~~,~ ~t r PAn-:, let / ~(f/c $ ~ ...... y , j , I to\' LJ\~~ "", WA$U l,rIG;;',J /(X vJA1f~ 1 ,,.It ~r1t SteptT'" Af:lo..tr If."'", ('" &.-~ J'" t /::> It.Jt L w/ ~.rT tTf f)tTC") tKlsli.JG. PI L r~ :, 2...f' t::~ '.rTrrJ4 oS F = " 3 ~ ., ~ tJQ' e1/",J<at'" ~ r-'~ f. co,.JfI4~~TIO,J AP-r PP'Fdf'tt> . ~K@; "'l~ c/\pS 'H\~" "., D~n "'~W OU2 """8 ~TP''''GfFtS l7 QiJrl -z.I. g.s' ' pr ~ ClJt tsf, I'JI, ,. b 4XB: STRINGERS 2X6 DECKING I 2e"± L O.H.W: 21,B5 3/4" GALV I DRIFT -PIN .' PILING SCALE: 1"=2' , . .., ~ \ 2XB FACIA (OPTIONAL) 6XB CAPS " :' fIlA/Nf, P~fA I~II' -rc; r" !tf, I'! rI~; ~ l F"" .AlE' r><l~r ftAr1 f I I (f..J r po t1~ ,J r1 ALL NEW DECKlN6 ANDfASCIA TOSESELECT STRUCTURAL u tJ T R. •. /\ l.AS ~A,J '( ~ it 0 I.J C-f £)"A:·R ' ALL NEV't CAPS A~JD STRINGERS,TO,aE #2 AND BETIER D~,TREATED WITH -'\ c q. ALL HARDWARE TO BE ~OT DIf!PED GALVANIZED, IN: LAKE WASHINGTON AT: p.~rJTG',J COUNlY OF: KING STATE:. WAStl'NGTON APPL',8Y: rl"p."i.AtJ JAMr..r t ""l(~/\ PAGE: :1. OF ~ DATE; ttl ~ t? C ~ twtC~----- I' I --~t---------' ----' '@ 412.85' N Aoe~n'~· 219.31' .. • ilili.lt;;i!;,;!,;i"1ii,,j~o~ . k,,: 0" ',\. .. \' Set fbHj Bsnt EJdIIt wlWc:: LEA ···-0 -\--: -_. . .. _---........... --~ ...... -.. -._--....... --... -... -.. -.--.. -----...... -.... -............. ~ ~~-~Jrt ....... . ~ ZONING 0' ~ TBCIINICAL 8BJlVICBS - - - -Renton Clv Llmilll y to;;!!90 "fO C 3 1"'800 31 T24N R5E W 1/2 5431 t:ONING MAP Be->K RESIDENTIAL ~ Resource Conservation ~ Residential 1 dulac ~ Residential 4 dulac ~ Residential 8 dulac ~ Residential Manufactured Homes 1 R-lO I Residential 10 dulac I R-141 Residential 14 dulac I RM-rl Residential Multi-Family I RH-T I Residential Multi-Family Traditional IRH-U I Residential Multi-Family Urban Center· MIXED USE CENTER ~ Center Vtllage luc-NII Urban Cenler -Nortb 1 \UC-N2\ Urban Cenler -Nortb 2 ~ Cenler Downtown· ~ Commerclal/Ortlce/Resldentlal COMMERCIAL 833 \ , J~ I 2T22N R~E \ INDUSTRIAL W Industrial -Heavy ~ Industrial -Medium o Industrial -Light <P) Publicly owned _____ Renlon City Limits ___ ._ Adjacent City Llmila _ Book Pages Boundary ;-.- ~ Commercial Arterial- ~ Commercial Office- @ Commercial Neiahborhood KROLL PAGE • May include Overlay Districts. See Appendix maps. For addltiona) regulations in Overlay Districts. please see RMC 4-3. Printed by Print & Mall SVC8, City of Renton PAGE# INDEX SECTfTOWN.oRANQf. / f- / L 5.52' 5 23"38'19" W '1 ,/ ./' / \~ ,/ \\) PORTION OF GOV'T LOT 4, SECTION CI TY OF REN TON, 31, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, STA TE OF WASHINGTON 4 ------ EX CONCRETE BULKHEAD-" EX WOOD PILES 1198.84 : ~"-o~ ~~\l\ , t,i ~~~ / 1'''-/ / ~ / • I • 1/1 1/ I II --_.\_-.---.... -------------t --- WA TER {LEVA nON = 20.66'(10/19/99) ~1-'VoG II ~0- ,--_FOUND 1/2" REBAR &' CAP LS #16230 LOT 53 EX FENCE N 89°30'59" W 81 c) 1<)1 LOT 54 ~-e=t-----A2 LOT 55 186.27 412.85' FOUND 1/2" REBAR & CAP LS #16230 '----SET 2" HUB ON LINE LOT 56 LOT 57 193.13' RANGE 5 EAST, FOUND NAIL IN LEAD IN CONCRETE DRIVE -'' R= 1197.51 L=60.46 Tan=30.24 Delta=02"53'35" FOUND 1/2" REBAR &=----f CAP LS #16230 I --1 I W.M. L=2.85 R=1197.51 Delto=00'08'11 " BUILDING GRAPHIC SCALE ( IN FEET ) 1 Inch = 20 ft. ~ SURVEY NOTES L BASIS OF BEARING: RECORD OF SURVEY PREPARED BY MS WEBB SURVEYING UNDER RECORDING NO. 9109179005 0-BENCHMARK: SOUTH END TOP OF CONCRETE BULKHEAD PER TOPOGRAPHIC MAP PREPARED BY MS WEBB SURVEYING ELEVA nON = 22.50' LEGEND ® EX SSMH e DECIDUOUS TREE 0 EX CA TCH BASIN TYPE 1 * @ EX CA TCH BASIN TYPE 2 CONIFER TREE WATER VALVE 0 HEDGE X -¢ FIRE HYDRANT -<r UnLiTY POLE Hl WATER METER E--GUY POLE <D IRRIGA nON VAL VE 0 MAIL BOX ? WA TER BLOW OFF OJ TELEPHONE CABINET c::cco ROCKERY IlYl CABLE TV CABINET ~ MON IN CASE @ SURFACE BRASS MONUMEN 111 GAS VALVE )8( PK NAIL [Q] GAS METER 0 FOUND REBAR & CAP CD TELEPHONE MANHOLE OR IRON PIPE m POWER VAULT ------EX WA TER LINE --EX SANITARY SEWER LINE @ LIGHT POLE ---EX STORM LINE ):( YARD LIGHT -0-0-IRON FENCE @ MONITORING WELL 9" PEDESTRIAN PUSH BUTTON POLE n SIGN -"--<L TWO POST SIGN tzl TRAFFIC JUNCnON BOX LEGAL DESCRIP TION LOTS 54 AND 55, BLOCK "A ", CD HILLMAN'S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN NO I, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT TH£.RfOF RECORDEQ IN VOLl"lME 11 OF PLA TS,€A(J£ 63 IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON (/)<1) i f5~ I LaJ~ ..., ~~ ~ • ~~ ~ J, LaJ(i) l!! ;s ~~ II) lj ~~ ~ 0 ..... .... VI -~~ 2! ~ i!: ~ fil :g NO. DAN T MHT OCTOBER I, NO.