The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA-05-121I CITY OF RENTON PLANNING / BUILDING / PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM Date: November 16, 2006 To: City Clerk's Office From: Holly Graber Subject: Land ,Use File Closeout Please complete the following information to facilitate project closeout and indexing by the City Clerk's Office. Project Name: Falk II Annexation Prezone LUA (file) Number: LUA-05-121, R, ECF Cross-References:~ AKA's: k Prezone of Falk II Annexation Project Manager: Don Erickson Acceptance Date: October 13, 2005 Applicant: City of Renton Owner: Contact: City of Renton -Don Erickson PID Number: 322305-9097, 9162, 9170, 9171, 9176 ERC Approval Dat,: November 8, 2005 ERC Appeal Date: November 28, 2005 Administrative Denial: Appeal Period Ends: Public Hearing Date: Date Appealed to flEX: By Whom: .' " HEX DeCision: Date: Date Appealed to Council: By Whom: Council Decision: Date: Mylar Recording Number: Project Description: Prezone and environmental review of Falk II Annexation area . . , Location: 18607 102ND AVE SE and surrounding area Comments: I I· City of Renton LUA-OS-121, R, ECF Falk II Annexation Prezone 18607 102ND AVE SE and surrounding area STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING } AFFIDA VIT OF PUBLICATION PUBLIC NOTICE Tom Meagher, being first duly sworn on oath that he is the Legal Advertising Representative ofthe King County Journal a daily newspaper, which newspaper is a legal newspaper of general circulation and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date 6f publication hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continuously as a daily newspaper in King County, Washington. The King County Journal has been approved as a Legal Newspaper by order of the Superior Court ofthe State of Washington for King County. The notice in the exact form annexed was published in regular issues of the King County Journal (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a Public Notice was published on November 14,2005. The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum ::;i;L \\\\UUtIlIII ... "" ~ Y L.lJ II". ~~O •••• -... '.tl.i..".o ~ ") .... ~01"A" ... "t'.,.;,~ ~ /' VJ'J-\ 0 ~ Tom Meagher = '" i ~J(p \ 7.. :. Legal Advertising Representative, King County Journal : ~ i '04/18/10, ! = Subscribed and sworn to me this 14th day of November, 2005; ?-\ ~ '09 l ~ S ,... ,,~, ~ ~OA""UC/rI~ = " ~ ... --.... rS>~~ ~",. OVA.~ ~, ... . r'~lIun\\\~ JodYt . Barton Notary Public for the State of Washington, Residing in Auburn, Washington PO Number: Cost of publishing this notice includes an affidavit surcharge. NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMI'ITEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Com- mittee has issued a Determination of Non-Significance for the following pro- ject under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. Falk II Annexation Prezone LUA05-121, A, PZ, ECF Location: The site is adjacent to City Limits on two sides and is bordered by 102nd Ave SE on the east. The applicant, has requested Environmental Review for the proposed prezoning of this 6.29- acres annexation site (excluding streets) to Renton R-8. Because annexations are SEPA exempt CRCW 43.2IC.222) this environ- mental review is only for the rezone. Under Renton's proposed zoning the 6.29-acre site (excluding street right-of-way) could theo- retically accommodate + 40 dwell- ing units. The proposed rezone is consistent with Renton's Residen- tial Single Family land use des- ignation, as shown on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on November 28, 2005. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Exam- iner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Sec- tion 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. Published in the King County Journal November 14,2005. #849964 City of Re ••• .,n Department of Planning / Bui/ding / Public L. VI ,,5 ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ~ APPLICATION NO: LUAOS-121, A, PZ, ECF APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT TITLE: Falk II Annexation Prezone SITE AREA: 6.29 acres LOCATION: The site is adjacent to City limits on two sides and is bordered by 102"d Avenue SE on the east. COMMENTS DUE: OCTOBER 27, 2005 DATE CIRCULATED: Jl 1'1 ?nOS'll PROJECT MAN6R: / Erika Conkling ;>c\ ......... PLAN REVIEW: Kayren Kittrick \ 0:' BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A WORK ORDER NO: 77488 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicants for the proposed Falk II Annexation have requested that the City prezone the subject site in advance of annexation, pursuant to RCW 3SA.14.330, so zoning will be in place at the time the subject site comes into the City. The City is proposing to prezone the 6.29 acre proposed annexation area R-8. This corresponds with the Residential Single Family designation in Renton's Comprehensive Plan. Whereas the proposed annexation is considered to be a non-project action under SEPA, the proposed zoning is not. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14 000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or aroas """e ad&-C~ed to properly as,.»"", proposel. L~ y~ O~ Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON·SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: Falk II AnnexaHon Prezone PROJECT NUMBER: LUAOSo121, A, pz. ECF LOCATION: The site Is adjacent to City Limits on two side. and Is bordered by 102nd Ava SE on the east. DESCRIPTION: The applicant, has requested Environmental Review for the proposed prezonlng of this 6.29-acres annexation site (excluding streets) to Renton R-8. Because annexations are SEPA exempt (RCW 43.21C.222) this environmental review I. only for the rezone. Under Renton's proposed zoning the 8.29-acre stt. (excluding str •• t rlght-of.way) could theoretically accommodate + 40 dwelling units, The proposed rezone Is consistent with Renton's Residential Slng'e Family land use designation, as shown on the City'. Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the environmental determination must be flied In writing on or before 5:00 PM on November 28, 2005. Appeals must be filed In writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Ranton Municipal Code Section 4-8·110.B. Additional Information regarding the appeal process may ba obtained from the Ronton City Clort<'s OffIco, (425) 430-6510. IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED, A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE SET AND ALL PARTIES NOTIFIED. ---FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT (425) 430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please Include the project NUMBER when Clllllnt for proper file Identification. CERTIFICATION I, Dere..k. Jor~ "" , hereby certify that .3 copies of the above document were posted by me in ~ conspicuous places or nearby the described property on DATE: ll/Iy/v S • SIGNED: t:rR. ~~ .. CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 10th day of November, 2005, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing ERC Determination documents. This information was sent to: Name Agencies See Attached (Signature of Sender):..,.~ ~ STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy Tucker ;R.epresentjng signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. ... ~ .• Dated: IlhDf6f (}~k21fJ1&Jr / I No\rry Public in and for the Sate of Washington Notary (print): __ -=-O...::;..~~Y ~/Q=-J ~f---=d:.-· ...!...t1_~ _______ _ My appointment expires: ~I ('7 {~ Prql~ct Name: Falk \I Annexation Prezone Project Number: LUA05-121, A, PZ, ECF template -affidavit of service by mailing Dept. of Ecology • Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 WSDOT Northwest Region· Attn: Ramin Pazooki King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240 PO Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 US Army Corp. of Engineers • Seattle District Office Attn: SEPA Reviewer PO Box C-3755 Seattle, WA 98124 Jamey Taylor • Depart. of Natural Resources PO Box 47015 Olympia, WA 98504-7015 KC Dev. & Environmental Servo Attn: SEPA Section 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 Metro Transit Senior Environmental Planner Gary Kriedt AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING (ERe DETERMINATIONS) WDFW -Stewart Reinbold • Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. • clo Department of Ecology Attn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer 3190 160th Ave SE 39015 -172nd Avenue SE Bellevue, WA 98008 Auburn, WA 98092 Duwamish Tribal Office • Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program • 4717 IN Marginal Way SW Attn: Ms Melissa Calvert Seattle, WA 98106-1514 39015 172nd Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092-9763 KC Wastewater Treatment Division· Office of Archaeology & Historic Environmental Planning Supervisor Preservation· Ms. Shirley Marroquin Attn: Stephanie Kramer 201 S. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050 PO Box 48343 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 Olympia, WA 98504-8343 City of Newcastle City of Kent Attn: Mr. Micheal E. Nicholson Attn: Mr. Fred Satterstrom, AICP Director of Community Development Acting Community Dev. Director 13020 SE 72nd Place 220 Fourth Avenue South Newcastle, WA 98059 Kent, WA 98032-5895 Puget Sound Energy City of Tukwila Municipal Liason Manager Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official Joe Jainga 6300 Southcenter Blvd. 201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431 PO Box 90868, MS: XRD-01W Tukwila, WA 98188 Seattle, WA 98104-3856 Bellevue, WA 98009-0868 Seattle Public Utilities Real Estate Services Title Examiner 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 PO Box 34018 Seattle, WA 98124-4018 Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS", the marked agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy of the checklist, PMT's, and the notice of application. • Also note, do not mail Jamey Taylor any of the notices she gets hers from the web. Only send her the ERC Determination paperwork. template -affidavit of service by mailing ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NUMBER: LOCATION: Falk II Annexation Prezone LUA05-121, A, PZ, ECF The site Is adjacent to City limits on two sides and is bordered by 102nd Ave SE on the east. DESCRIPTION: The applicant, has requested Environmental Review for the proposed prezonlng of this 6.29-acres annexation site (excluding streets) to Renton R-8. Because annexations are SEPA exempt (RCW 43.21C.222) this environmental review is only for the rezone. Under Renton's proposed zoning the 6.29-acre site (excluding street right-of-way) could theoretically accommodate + 40 dwelling units. The proposed rezone Is consistent with Renton's Residential Single Family land use designation, as shown on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on November 28, 2005 .. Appeals must be filed In writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED, A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE SET AND ALL PARTIES NOTIFIED. Falk II Annexation Ptopoted lDnIIO Mop FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT (425) 430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please include the proJect NUMBER when calUng for proper file identification. Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor November 10, 2005 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 CITY. RENTON PlanningIBuildinglPublic Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator Subject: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on November 8, 2005: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NUMBER: LOCATION: DESCRIPTION: Falk II Annexation Prezone LUA05-121, A, PZ, ECF The site is adjacent to City Limits on two sides and is bordered by 102nd Ave SE on the east. The applicant, has requested Environmental Review for the proposed prezoning of this 6.29-acres annexation site (excluding streets) to Renton R-8. Because annexations are SEPA exempt (RCW 43.21 C.222) this environmental review is only for the rezone. Under Renton's proposed zoning the 6.29-acre site (excluding street right-of-way) could theoretically accommodate + 40 dwelling units. The proposed rezone is consistent with Renton's Residential Single Family land use designation, as shown on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on November 28, 2005. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. If you have questions, please call me at (425) 430-6578. For the Environmental Review Committee, Erika Conkling Associate Planner cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division WDFW, Stewart Reinbold David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources WSDOT, Northwest Region Duwamish Tribal Office Karen Walter, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (Ordinance) Melissa Calvert, Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program US Army Corp. of Engineers _E~rI"l7IC""lo""'s,"u",r:,...t_ep_h_a_n_ie_K_r,-a_m_e_r'_O_ffi_lc_e_o_f_A_rC_h_ae_O_IO_9_y_&_H_is_to_ri_c_p_re_s_e_rv_a_tio_n _______ ~R E N TON 1055 South Grady Way -Renton, Washington 98055 * This paper contains 50% recyded material, 30% post consumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE Date: To: From: CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM November 10, 2005 File Environmental Review Committee Subject: Falk II Annexation Prezone LUA05-121, A, PZ, ECF This is to inform you that the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) have completed their review of the environmental impacts of the above-referenced project. The Committee, on November 8, 2005, decided that your project will be issued a Determination of Non-Significance. The City of Renton ERC has determined that it does not have a probable Significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made by the ERC under the authority of Section 4-6-6, Renton Municipal Code, after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information, on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on November 28, 2005. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.8. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. If the Environmental Determination is appealed, a public hearing date will be set and all parties notified. ERG Determination Memo 05-121 CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON·SIGNIFICANCE APPLICATION NUMBER: LUA05-121, A, PZ, ECF APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT NAME: Falk II Annexation Prezone DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, has requested Environmental Review for the proposed prezoning of this 6.29-acres annexation site (excluding streets) to Renton R-8. Because annexations are SEPA exempt (RCW 43.21 C.222) this environmental review is only for the rezone. Under Renton's proposed zoning the 6.29-acre site (excluding street right-of-way) could theoretically accommodate + 40 dwelling units. The proposed rezone is consistent with Renton's Residential Single Family land use designation, as shown on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: LEAD AGENCY: The site is adjacent to City Limits on two sides and is bordered by 102nd Ave SE on the east. City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section This Determination of Non-Significance is issued under WAC 197-11-340. Because other agencies of jurisdiction may be involved, the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fourteen (14) days. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on November 28, 2005. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 O.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: November 14,2005 DATE OF DECISION: November 8, 2005 SIGNATURES: ~LUt~ ! enniSLJ:Administrator . Community Services EDNSP ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING NOTICE November 8, 2005 To: Gregg Zimmerman, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator Dennis Culp, Community Services Administrator Lee Wheeler, Fire Chief Alex Pietsch, EDNSP Administrator From: Jennifer Henning, Development Planning Meeting Date: Tuesday, November 8,2005 Time: 9:00AM Location: Sixth Floor Conference Room #620 Agenda listed below. Defoor Short Plat (Ding) LUA05-089, SHPL-H, ECF The applicant is proposing to subdivide a 140,723 square foot (3.2 acre) site zoned Residential-8 dwelling units per acre (R-8) into 5 lots and an open space tract (Parcel B). The lots are proposed to range in size from 5,500 square feet to 11,574 square feet. The lots are intended for the eventual development of single-family residences. The subject site contains a Class 3 stream, 2 Class 4 streams, a Class 3 wetland, steep slopes, and high coal mine hazard areas. Defoor Preliminary Plat (Ding) LUA05-093, PP, ECF The applicant is proposing to subdivide a 6.91-acre site zoned Residential - 8 dwelling units per acre (R-8) into 21 lots ranging in size from 5,250 square feet to 8,500 square feet. The lots are intended for the eventual development of single-family residences. The subject site contains a Class 3 stream, 2 Class 4 streams, a Class 3 wetland, steep slopes, and high coal mine hazard areas. Akers Farm Annexation Prezone (Erickson) LUA05-120, A, PZ, ECF The applicant has requested Environmental Review for the proposed prezoning of this 13-acres annexation site (excluding streets) to Renton R-8. Because annexations are SEPA exempt (RCW 43.21C.222) this environmental review is only for the rezone. Under Renton's proposed zoning the 13- acre site (excluding street right-of-way) could theoretically accommodate .:!:. 83 dwelling units. The proposed rezone is consistent with Renton's Residential Single Family land use designation, as shown on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. Falk /I Annexation Prezone (Erickson) LUA05-121, A, PZ, ECF The applicant has requested Environmental Review for the proposed prezoning of this 6.29-acres annexation site (excluding streets) to Renton R-8. Because annexations are SEPA exempt (RCW 43.21 C.222) this environmental review is only for the rezone. Under Renton's proposed zoning the 6.29- acre site (excluding street right-of-way) could theoretically accommodate.:!:. 40 dwelling units. The proposed rezone is consistent with Renton's Residential Single Family land use designation, as shown on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map cc: K. Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor J. Covington, Chief Administrative Officer B. Wolters, EDNSP Director ® J. Gray, Fire Prevention N. Watts, P/B/PW Development Services Director ® F. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner S. Engler, Fire Prevention ® J. Medzegian, Council S. Meyer, P/B/PW Transportation Systems Director R. Lind, Economic Development L. Warren, City Attorney ® STAFF REPORT A. BACKGROUND City of Renton Department of Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE ERC MEETING DA TE November 8, 2005 Project Name Applicant File Number Project Manager Project Description Project Location Exist. Bldg. Area gsf Site Area SITE MAP See below. Project Location Map Falk II Annexation Prezone Don Erickson LUA 05-121, A, RZ, ECF Don Erickson The applicant, has requested Environmental Review for the proposed prezoning of this 6.29-acres annexation site (excluding streets) to Renton R-8. Because annexations are SEPA exempt (RCW 43.21C.222) this environmental review is only for the rezone. Under Renton's proposed zoning the 6.29-acre site (excluding street right-of-way) could theoretically accommodate ± 40 dwelling units. The proposed rezone is consistent with Renton's Residential Single Family land use designation, as shown on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. The site is adjacent to City Limits on two sides and is bordered by 102nd Ave SE on the east. It is located in the SW 1/4 of Section 32, Township 23 N, Range 5E. N/A Proposed New Bldg. Area gsf N/A 6.29 acres Total Building Area gsf N/A ERe Report 05-121 ... City of Renton EDNSP Department FALK II ANNEXATION PREZONE REPORT AND DECISION OF NOVEMBER 8, 2005 -~r~ 1L ,,--\ Falk II Annexation ERe Report 05-121 .. ,/ "". ", ! ~ • .. Envi mtal Review Committee Staff Report LUA-05-121 A, RZ, ECF Page2 of3 ",,./ . /~r~ _/: .. I [- _-----ojl I I ... . "':-. " ' -", ... ' " , 6(1( t l.iOO , 7~(J1) .. City of Renton EDNSP Department FALK II ANNEXATION PREZONE REPORT AND DECISION OF NOVEMBER 8, 2005 B. RECOMMENDA TION Envi mtal Review Committee Staff Report LUA-05-J2J A, RZ, ECF Page30f3 Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: x DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS with 15 day Comment Period with Concurrent 14 day Appeal Period. C. MITIGA TION MEASURES None required for this non-project action. D. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS DETERMINA TION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGA TED, Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period with Concurrent 14 da A eal Period. Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period followed by a 14 day Appeal Period. In compliance with RCW 43.21 C. 240, the following non-project environmental review addresses only those impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. 1. Transportation Impacts: None identified for this non-project legislative action. At the most likely scenario for build-out 40 potential dwellings could potentially create 400 average vehicle trip ends per week day. There are already 5 dwellings and approximately 50 average vehicle trip ends per week day in the area and development of additional units is likely to occur regardless of the change in zoning. However, mitigation can be provided at the time there are specific project proposals before the City, Mitigation Measures: Impacts, if any, are better assessed at the project level. 2. Surface waterl waste water Impacts: Surface water issues have been identified in the area of this proposed prezone. Mitigation Measures: At the time of permitting, future development must comply with either the 2005 King county Surface Water Design Manual Conservation Flow Control Standard and King County Water Quality Treatment Standards, or the City of Renton storm water standards, whichever is stricter. E. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS The proposal has been circulated to City Departmental/Divisional Reviewers for their review. Where applicable, these comments have been incorporated into the text of this report as Mitigation Measures and/or Notes to Applicant . ...lL.-Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. __ Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. Environmental Determination Appeal Process Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM, November 28, 2005. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. ERG Report 05-121 , FALK II ANNEXATION PREZONE LEGAL DESCRIPTION The south half (1/2) of the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter of the southwest quarter of Section 32, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., King County, Washington, LESS the north 72 feet thereof, LESS roads; TOGETHER WITH the north quarter of the southwest quarter of the northwest quarter of the southwest quarter of said Section 32, LESS roads. '. h St Falk II Annexation Proposed Zoning Map e-Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning + lID + Ale. Pietsch, Administrato< ~ G,DeIRosario ,/i'N'tQ 10 [)ecembcI" 2004 S 17 th - --City Umits Pi/OW] R-8 Zoning 0 ~ 600 1200 tue J coui 1 . 7200 . 4" City of •• vnton Department of Planning I Building I Public vvorks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET APPLICANT: Cit of Renton PROJECT TITLE: Falk II Annexation Prezone SITE AREA: 6.29 acres LOCATION: The site is adjacent to City limits on two sides and is bordered b 1 02nd Avenue SE on the east. COMMENTS DUE: OCTOBER 27, 2005 DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 13,2005 PROJECT MANAGER: Erika Conklin BUILDING AREA WORK ORDER NO: 77488 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicants for the proposed Falk II Annexation have requested that the City prezone the subject site in advance of annexation, pursuant to RCW 35A.14.330, so zoning will be in place at the time the subject site comes into the City. The City is proposing to prezone the 6.29 acre proposed annexation area R-8. This corresponds with the Residential Single Family designation in Renton's Comprehensive Plan. Whereas the proposed annexation is considered to be a non-project action under SEPA, the proposed zoning is not. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water LifJht/Glare '~, Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public SelVices Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14 000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date City of _____ ton Department of Planning / Building / Public .. orks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Surfard ~ COMMENTS DUE: OCTOBER 27, 2005 APPLICATION NO: LUA05-121, A, PZ, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 13,2005 APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT MANAGER: Erika ConklinQ PROJECT TITLE: Falk" Annexation Prezone PLAN REVIEW: Kayren Kittrick SITE AREA: 6.29 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A LOCATION: The site is adjacent to City limits on two sides and WORK ORDER NO: 77488 is bordered by 1 02nd Avenue SE on the east. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicants for the proposed Falk " Annexation have requested that the City prezone the subject site in advance of annexation, pursuant to RCW 35A.14.330, so zoning will be in place at the time the subject site comes into the City. The City is proposing to prezone the 6.29 acre proposed annexation area R-8. This corresponds with the Residential Single Family designation in Renton's Comprehensive Plan. Whereas the proposed annexation is considered to be a non-project action under SEPA, the proposed zoning is not. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housin.a Air -' Aesthetics Water V Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet ~~ peq4ih:£E3-,4~I«~W~~ ~ 1/)& 06f:C!IC?k .b /(-8 r€2-0N/2! / hotcJer.ter; SU+.= uJaZi>L 1>'>'/l2~ ex.f~. ~ ~ al-fl:-l~cA a~~a:t-/~ kv-/ew--: . ..... h~ ........ ~~~ __ ~ .. ~ ____ ~~ .. ~~~..? B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED' COMMENTS le4Jj~<--fitw ~ 1) ,..p.vc:/"l<J"A fvo I ~ '" -rk-~(~..Jr A fl/\eoc:&\.:k~ ~ to ~Mr t; w~t\--. ~ "Z.Dc>~ (c.~~ G..U\A.\-Y 61).0" ~ ~, DeS'" ''7(\ (~V\v,J CO(\~C<"\J~ ~to V\) t;...vhr-ol "'"u~","",,-~ .... J rTND w~Q.~l-.,.y ~J 'b~ ~,4-~ of- StZ:Rk 0 2.. c-~..c.:, ~()IJ-Z.D l,c Sr£.Ic<1f-AI T1 me (/ F-?a,. ~~ t . We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are he e addition I i ormation is needed ess this proposal. City of •...... ton Department of Planning / Building / Public .. orks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 'Plan R,e..,v')~et J...J APPLICATION NO: LUA05-121, A, PZ, ECF APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT TITLE: Falk II Annexation Prezone SITE AREA: 6.29 acres LOCATION: The site is adjacent to City limits on two sides and is bordered by 102nd Avenue SE on the east. COMMENTS DUE: OCTOBER 27, 2005 DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 13, 2005 PROJECT MANAGER: Erika Conkling PLAN REVIEW: Kayren Kittrick BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A WORK ORDER NO: 77488 -.... c. u c.uw BUILDING DIVIS:I(")J\ SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicants for the proposed Falk II Annexation have requested that the City prezone the subject site in advance of annexation, pursuant to RCW 35A.14.330, so zoning will be in place at the time the subject site comes into the City. The City is proposing to prezone the 6.29 acre proposed annexation area R-8. This corresponds with the Residential Single Family designation in Renton's Comprehensive Plan. Whereas the proposed annexation is considered to be a non-project action under SEPA, the proposed zoning is not. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housina Air Aesthetics Water LiahtlGlare ',', Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED; COMMENTS rv~ We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. City of ....... ton Department of Planning / Bui/ding / Public •• orks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: -r.r:;. "'~""""''J( t .J.:-... ,y W 'a.El . <".rA>1 IlY \ APPLICATION NO: LUA05-121, A, PZ, ECF APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT TITLE: Falk II Annexation Prezone SITE AREA: 6.29 acres LOCATION: The site is adjacent to City limits on two sides and is bordered by1 02nd Avenue SE on the east. COMMENTS DUE: OCTOBER 27, 2005 DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 13, 2005 PROJECT MANAGER: Erika Conklinq PLAN REVIEW: Kayren Kittrick BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A WORK ORDER NO: 77488 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicants for the proposed Falk II Annexation have requested that the City prezone the subject site in advance of annexation, pursuant to RCW 35A.14.330, so zoning will be in place at the time the subject site comes into the City. The City is proposing to prezone the 6.29 acre proposed annexation area R-8. This corresponds with the Residential Single Family designation in Renton's Comprehensive Plan. Whereas the proposed annexation is considered to be a non-project action under SEPA, the proposed zoning is not. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable Environment Minor Major Impacts Impacts Earth Air Water Plants Land/Shoreline Use Animals Environmental Health Energy/ Natural Resources B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS AJ~ C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS rJlM-. More Information Necessary Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Housing Aesthetics Light/Glare ';. Recreation Utilities Transportation Public Services Historic/Cultural Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14 000 Feet We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are~s where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Date City of Renton Department of Planning / Building / Public vvorks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: F\re..-COMMENTS DUE: OCTOBER 27, 2005 APPLICATION NO: LUAOS-121, A, PZ, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 13 200S r·· '-,',. ; APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT MANAGER: (Erika C9n~hijg;' ii '--" L: PROJECT TITLE: Falk II Annexation Prezone PLAN REVIEW: KayrJ, Ki~rck I· : . SITE AREA: 6.29 acres BUILDING AREA (gro~): r\J)J nf'T 1 A ?MI; i; i j . · LOCATION: The site is adjacent to City limits on two sides and WORK ORDER NO: 7~~8~~ -, _vvv 1'·--' i is bordered by 1 02nd Avenue SE on the east. '--;--_-~_;:_---.-J I SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicants for the proposed Falk II Annexation have mquested thatlt~ Ci!y p~Zbne the sU~ject site in advance of annexation, pursuant to RCW 3SA.14.330, so zoning will be in place at the time the subject site comes Into the City. The City is proposing to prezone the 6.29 acre proposed annexation area R-S. This corresponds with the Residential Single Family designation in Renton's Comprehensive Plan. Whereas the proposed annexation is considered to be a non-project action under SEPA, the proposed zoning is not. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare "', Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have re iewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or a""", wh", add/_lin', hon /, neaded to propsrly asse", !hI, proposal. I 0 IL~ Date ! City of nenton Department of Planning / Building / Public -Narks EN V, RON fl1 E N TAL & DE VEL 0 PM E N TAP P L , CAT' 0 N REV' ~W 5 H E Srl' REVIEWING DEPART:MENT: p~ COMMENTS DUE: OCTOBER 27, 20~ cg tn APPLICATION NO: L!.JA05-121, A, PZ, ECF APPLICANT: City of Renton I PROJECT TITLE: Falk II Annexation Prezone SITE AREA: 6.29 acres LOCATION: The site is adjacent to City limits on two sides and is bordered by 102"d Avenue SE on the east. '=:;" DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 13, 2005 ?;,( PROJECT MANAGER: Erika Conkling PLAN REVIEW: Kayren Kittrick BUILDING AREAJgrosst; N/A WORK ORDER NO: 77488 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicants for the proposed Falk II Annexation have requested that the City prezone the subject site in advance of annexation, pursuant to RCW 35A.14.330, so zoning will be in place at the time the subject site comes into the City. The City is proposing to prezone the 6.29 acre proposed annexation area R-8. This corresponds with the Residential Single Family designation in Renton's Comprehensive Plan. Whereas the proposed annexation is considered to be a non-project action under SEPA, the proposed zoning is not. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare ',', Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where dditional information is n ded to properly assess this proposal. c-j~ /0/dItl~ Date City of •• v .. ton Department of Planning / Building / Public v{orks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ~H Ct\ COMMENTS DUE: OCTOBER 27, 2005 APPLICATION NO: LUA05-121, A, PZ, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 13, 2005 APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT MANAGER: Erika Conkling PROJECT TITLE: Falk II Annexation Prezone PLAN REVIEW: Kayren Kittrick SITE AREA: 6.29 acres BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A LOCATION: The site is adjacent to City limits on two sides and WORK ORDER NO: 77488 is bordered by 102nd Avenue SE on the east. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicants for the proposed Falk II Annexation have requested that the City prezone the subject site in advance of annexation, pursuant to RCW 35A.14.330, so zoning will be in place at the time the subject site comes into the City. The City is proposing to prezone the 6.29 acre proposed annexation area R-8. This corresponds with the Residential Single Family designation in Renton's Comprehensive Plan. Whereas the proposed annexation is considered to be a non-project action under SEPA, the proposed zoning is not. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare "Ci, Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public SeNices Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14.000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or re additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 'LEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON· SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) DATE: October 13. 2005 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA'()S·121, A, pz, ECF APPLICATION NAME: FALK "ANNEXATION PREZONE PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicants for the proposed Falk II Annexation have requested that the City prezone the subject site in advance of annexation, pursuant to RCW 35A.14.330, so zoning will be in place at the time the subject site comes into the City. The City Is proposing to prezone the 6.29 acre proposed annexation area R~8. This corresponds with the Residential Single Family designation in Renton's Comprehensive Plan. Whereas the proposed annexation is considered to be a non-project action under SEPA, the proposed zoning is not. PROJECT LOCATION: This site is adjacent to City Limits on two sides and is bordered by 102nd Ave SE on the east. It Is In the SW Y. of Sectlon 32, Township 23 Nt Range 5 E. OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-8IGNIFICANCE (DNS): As tho Load Agency, the Clly of Renton has determined that significant environmental Impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed zoning. Therefore, 8S permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110, the City of Renton Is using the Optional ONS process to give notice that 8 DNS Is likely to be Issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed ONS are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the Issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non·Slgnlflcance (ONS). A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS, PERMIT APPUCATION DATE: October 3, 2005 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: October 13, 2005 Permits/Review Requested: Other Permits which may be required: Requested Studies: Location where application may be reviewed: PUBLIC HEARING: CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Land Use: Environmental Doc::uments that Evaluat. the Proposed Project: Environmental (SEPA) Review and Prezone N/A N/A Plannlng/Butldlng/Publlc Works Division, Development Services Department. 1055 South Grady Way, Ronton, WA 96055 Council accepted the proposed Direct Petitlon to annex at its public hearing on August 1, 2005 and held the first of two required public hearings on the proposed prazonlng on this 8ame dete. The subject site Is located within the Residential Single Family (RS) Comprehensive Pian Land Use Map designation. The proposed R-8 prezone is consistent with this land use designation, as well as relevant land use policies adopted In November 2004. Environmental Checklist prepared September 27, 2005 Falk II Annexation Proposed ZOning Map ---Clyl.lt* C:::' A-8lo11l'0 o 600 I: 7200 1200 I Development Regulations Used For Project MitIgation: This non-project action will be subject to the City's SEPA Ordinance and Development Regulations and other applicable codes and regulations as appropriate. f you would like to be made a party of record 10 receive further Information on this proposed project, complete his form and retum to: City of Renton, Development Planning, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. 'II_ NoJNam.: LUA.Q5·121 ,A, PZ, ECF Proposed Mitigation Me.sures: The analysis of the proposal does not reveal any adverse environmental impacts requiring mitigation above and beyond existing code proviSions. However. mitlgatlon may be necessary and may be imposed at the time of 8 site specific development proposal on the subject annexation site. 'alk II Annexation Prazonlng ~AME: ________________________________________________ __ Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Don Erickson, Senior Planner, Economic Development Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055, by 5;00 PM on October 27,2005. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact the Project Manager. Anyone who submits written comments will Butomaticalfy become a party of record and will be notified of any deciSion on this project. ~DDRESS: ______________________________________________ __ fELEPHONE NO.: __________________ _ CONTACT PERSON: NOTICE OF APPlICATION,doe DON ERICKSON (425) 430-6581 mT1CE OF APPLICATION.doc CERTIFICATION I, (jU d/!-Ij cS u h; q , hereby certify that :3 copies of the above document were posted by me in 0 conspicuous places or nearby the described property on DATE: /0.1<1· doOS,-SIGNED: ~~ A IIJT' Sub""""d ""d ,worn ""fore mo •• N"'r Publ". m ond foc th, Stat< of :""",gton ':1~ ~I' / ~ ~ AJJ~ ,onthe t~ day of Otft;~ J6D~ . -T Jl W~ r-. ,> i'lOTAi:1Y PUBLIC . ~ STATE OF WASHINGTON ~ 1 COMMISS!O[~ EXPIRES t 'Ii ~JIAr:'r:f! .1(:' ')ilnl':; i ,~\ '-.'c, ,.'~ .. , ,,~-.""'.J"' ," "'" _I .~_ • .I ':'. , OTARY PUBLIC SIGNATURE: .11 1 a CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 13th day of October, 2005, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing NOA, Environmental Checklist, PMT's documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing_ Agencies -NOA, Env. Checklist, PMT's only See Attached Surrounding Property Owners -NOA only See Attached (Signature of Sender)';,..: ~::""::":'::'=~L-..::s::~~:':""":"---------4-1..a:u!U(l~ F. KOKKO STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy Tucker NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF WASHINGTON COMMISSION EXPIRES MARCH 19, 2006 signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. I fl A < /l ) L#: Dated: IO/zg/OO ~]~C , r Notary Public in and for the Sate of Washington Notary (print):._---..rC7-~~:..-.....r-y~U=~___=p:....._._:..~_!!..:...._/4 _______ _ My appointment expires: 3f tt:fJ( 06 Project Name: Falk " Annexation Prezone .> Project Number: LUA05-121, A, PZ, ECF template -affidavit of service by mailing .. , Dept. of Ecology * Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 WSDOT Northwest Region * Attn: Ramin Pazooki King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240 PO Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 US Army Corp. of Engineers * Seattle District Office Attn: SEPA Reviewer PO Box C-3755 Seattle, WA 98124 Jamey Taylor * Depart. of Natural Resources PO Box 47015 Olympia, WA 98504-7015 KC Dev. & Environmental Servo Attn: SEPA Section 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 Metro Transit Senior Environmental Planner Gary Kriedt AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING (ERe DETERMINATIONS) WDFW -Stewart Reinbold * Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. * c/o Department of Ecology Attn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer 3190 160th Ave SE 39015 _172nd Avenue SE Bellevue, WA 98008 Auburn, WA 98092 Duwamish Tribal Office * Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program * 4717 W Marginal Way SW Attn: Ms Melissa Calvert Seattle, WA 98106-1514 39015 172nd Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092-9763 KC Wastewater Treatment Division * Office of Archaeology & Historic Environmental Planning Supervisor Preservation* Ms. Shirley Marroquin Attn: Stephanie Kramer 201 S. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050 PO Box 48343 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 Olympia, WA 98504-8343 City of Newcastle City of Kent Attn: Mr. Micheal E. Nicholson Attn: Mr. Fred Satterstrom, AICP Director of Community Development Acting Community Dev. Director 13020 SE 72nd Place 220 Fourth Avenue South Newcastle, WA 98059 Kent, WA 98032-5895 Puget Sound Energy City of Tukwila Municipal Liason Manager Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official Joe Jainga 6300 Southcenter Blvd. 201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431 PO Box 90868, MS: XRD-01W Tukwila, WA 98188 Seattle, WA 98104-3856 Bellevue, WA 98009-0868 Seattle Public Utilities Real Estate Services Title Examiner 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 PO Box 34018 Seattle, WA 98124-4018 Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS", the marked agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy of the checklist, PMT's, and the notice of application. * Also note, do not mail Jamey Taylor any of the notices she gets hers from the web. Only send her the ERC Determination paperwork. template -affidavit of service by mailing 322305909705 AVZARADEL SOL 15722 SE 160TH PL RENTON WA 98058 264140001001 BUI THU MAl+ TAN DINH 10210 SE 186TH ST RENTON WA 98055 264140002009 CHEA NORIN+PHANNY 10216 SE 186TH ST RENTON WA 98055 322305928606 GIBLER PAUL HLOIS L 18404 102ND AV SE RENTON WA 98055 855920007009 HOLMES TIMOTHY A+KRISTA M 739 S 47TH ST RENTON WA 98055 264140003007 LE CINDY 10222 SE 186TH ST RENTON WA 98055 264140004005 LOUIE KENNY S 10228 SE 186TH ST RENTON WA 98055 322305910000 MCINTOSH ROBERT D+KATHRYN L 10104 SE 187TH ST RENTON WA 98055 312305909300 ~~ MOORE PAUL M t.. ~ If':::, () PO BOX 5985 I" u-r--I..{ ~ KENT WA 98064 l d.V-i li),' 322305927400 BAKER G MARK 10011 SE 187TH ST RENTON WA 98055 312305904905 BUTTON EILEEN J 715 S 50TH RENTON WA 98055 312305910407 COOKS HENRY E 712 S 50TH ST RENTON WA 98055 322305908509 GREENE HOMER L+EILEEN M TRU 18616 102ND AV SE RENTON WA 98055 322305917609 KELLY CYNTHIA L 18517 102ND AV SE RENTON WA 98055 322305912402 LO ANDREW H K 10035 SE 187TH ST RENTON WA 98055 322305917104 MACKENZIE JOSEPH 18533 102ND AV SE RENTON WA 98055 947600018008 MCCABE JOHN H+NANCY 0 10220 SE 185TH PL RENTON WA 98055 322305916205 MCNAIR REID H+MEGAN J 18463 102ND AV SE RENTON WA 98055 947600019006 NGUYEN MICHAEL+NIEVES HIDROSOLLO 10214 SE 185TH PL RENTON WA 98055 264140045008 BRIERE LYNN A 10339 SE 187TH PL RENTON WA 98055 Sco\r 05--/21 322305929802 CALAGIU GEORGETA 18414 102ND AV SE RENTON WA 98055 312305915000 FINK LAWRENCE E+SALLY J 709 S 50TH RENTON WA 98055 322305932509 GREGOIRE ROBERT +MARY K 18717 102ND AV SE RENTON WA 98055 947600021002 KING COUNTY 500 KC ADMIN BLDG 500 4TH AV SEATTLE WA 98104 322305917005 LONGO L 18509 102ND SE RENTON WA 98055 322305926709 MALPHRUS THOMAS 18713 102ND AV SE RENTON WA 98055 322305921403 MCINTOSH ROBERT 18615 102ND AV SE RENTON WA 98055 312305910001TV'isted leFt-no MENDOZA JONATHAN ,f1;rw1>hd\t\.5 700 S 50TH ST Ct..GWte.~~ RENTON WA 98055 iO/ tJi to, 322305909606 RESERVE AT STONEHAVEN L L C THE 10519 20TH ST SE STE #1 EVERETT WA 98205 947600002002 REYES ALVIN A+LISA M 10211 SE 185TH PL RENTON WA 98055 85592000600 1 A4kM~ f\lbt- SPECIALIZED HOMES~f~"":.{) 3001 E YESLER WY l'1 lqlc5" SEATILE WA 98122 947600003000 VANNGUYEN JOHN+LIEU 10217 SE 185TH PL RENTON WA 98058 312305904806 SCHNEIDER HOMES I LLC 6510 SOUTHCENTER BL STE 1 TUKWILA WA 98188 322305916304 STECKLER MARTIN R & IRENE M 10012 SE 187TH ST RENTON WA 98055 947600001004 SHEPPARD JOHN B 10205 SE 185TH PL RENTON WA 98058 947600020004 STUTIGEN GLENN J 10208 SE 185TH PL RENTON WA 98055 NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON· SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) DATE: OCtober 13, 2005 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-05-121, A. pz, ECF APPLICATION NAME: FALK II ANNEXATION PREZONE PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicants for the proposed Falk II Annexation have requested that the City prezone the subject site in advance of annexation, pursuant to RCW 35A.14.330, so zoning will be in place at the time the subject site comes into the City. The City is proposing to prezone the 6.29 acre proposed annexation area R-8. This corresponds with the Residential Single Family designation in Renton's Comprehensive Plan. Whereas the proposed annexation is considered to be a non-project action under SEPA, the proposed zoning is not. PROJECT LOCATION: This site is adjacent to City Limits on two sides and is bordered by 102nd Ave SE on the east. It is in the SW Yo of Section 32, Township 23 N, Range 5 E. OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (DNS): As the Lead Agency, the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed zoning. Therefore, as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110, the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS process to give notice that a DNS is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Signifi~ance (DNS). A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: October 3, 2005 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: October 13, 2005 Permits/Review Requested: Other Permits which may be required: Requested Studies: Location where application may be reviewed: PUBLIC HEARING: CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Land Use: Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Development Regulations Environmental (SEPA) Review and Prezone N/A N/A Planning/Building/Public Works Division, Development Services Department, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055 Council accepted the proposed Direct Petition to annex at its public hearing on August 1, 2005 and held the first of two required public hearings on the proposed prezoning on this same date. The subject site is located within the Residential Single Family (RS) Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designation. The proposed R-8 prezone is consistent with this land use designation, as well as relevant land use policies adopted in November 2004. Environmental Checklist prepared September 27,2005 Used For Project Mitigation: This non-project action will be subject to the City's SEPA Ordinance and Development Regulations and other applicable codes and regulations as appropriate. Proposed Mitigation Measures: The analysis of the proposal does not reveal any adverse environmental impacts requiring mitigation above and beyond existing code provisions. However, mitigation may be necessary and may be imposed at the time of a site specific development proposal on the subject annexation site. Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Don Erickson, Senior Planner, Economic Development Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055, by 5:00 PM on October 27, 2005. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact the Project Manager. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: DON ERICKSON (425) 430-6581 NOTICE OF APPLICATION.doc I PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJL mMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FIL ENTIFICATION I Falk II Annexation o 600 1200 Proposed ZOning Map 1 : 7200 If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further inforrrlation on this proposed project, complete this form and return to: City of Renton, Development Planning, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. File No.lName: LUA·05·121 ,A, PZ, ECF Falk II Annexation Prezoning NAME: ____________________________________________________ __ ADDRESS: __________________________________________________ __ TELEPHONE NO.: __________________ __ NOTICE OF APPLICATION.doc Date: To: From: CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM October 13, 2005 File Development Planning Subject: Falk II Annexation Prezone LUA05-121, A, PZ, ECF The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on November 8, 2005. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. Document20 DEVElOPMEf\JT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON City of Renton lU~s-( ~( OCT 032005 RECEIVED LAND USE PERMIT MASTER APPLICATION PROPERTY OWNER(S) PROJECT INFORMATION NAME: CITY OF RENTON PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: Prezoning of the proposed Falk /I Annexation. ADDRESS: 1055 S. Grady Way PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION AND ZIP CODE: SW 114 of Section 32, Township 23 N, Range 5E. West of 1OZ'd Ave CITY: Renton ZIP: 98055 SE, South and East of Renton City Limits. TELEPHONE NUMBER: 425-430-6581 KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): 3223059-097, -162, -170, -171, -176. APPLICANT (if other than owner) NAME: Don Erickson EXISTING LAND USE(S):5 single-family units. COMPANY (if applicable): EDNSP Department PROPOSED LAND USE(S): Single family detached housing at densities of eight units per net acre. ADDRESS: 1055 S. Grady Way EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: (RS) Residential Single Family in Renton's Comprehensive Plan CITY: Renton ZIP: 98055 PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION TELEPHONE NUMBER 425-430-6581 (if applicable): RS CONTACT PERSON EXISTING ZONING: King County R-6; 6 units per gross acre PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): Renton R-B, B units per NAME: net acre. SITE AREA (in square feet): 273,995 rf (6.29 acres) COMPANY (if applicable): SQUARE FOOTAGE OF ROADWAYS TO BE DEDICATED FOR SUBDIVISIONS OR PRIVATE STREETS SERVING ADDRESS: THREE LOTS OR MORE (if applicable): nla PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET CITY: ZIP: ACRE (if applicable): Eight DUI net acre NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable): nla TELEPHONE NUMBER AND E-MAIL ADDRESS: NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): nla Q:web/pw/devserv/fonns/p\anning/masterapp.doc 09122/05 PROJ :T INFORMA TION (continw NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): n/a PROJECT VALUE: n/a SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF BUILDINGS (if applicable): n/a ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): n/a BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): n/a SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL CJ AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA ONE BUILDINGS (if applicable): n/a CJ AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA TWO SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): n/a CJ FLOOD HAZARD AREA sq. ft. NET FLOOR AREA OF NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if CJ GEOLOGIC HAZARD sq. ft. applicable): n/a CJ HABITAT CONSERVATION sq. ft. NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW PROJECT (if applicable): n/a CJ SHORELINE STREAMS AND LAKES sq. ft. CJ WETLANDS sq. ft. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (Attach legal description on separate sheet with the following information included) SITUATE IN THE -SW114 OF SECTION 32 ,TOWNSHIP 23N ,RANGE 5E ,IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES List all land use applications being applied for: 1. Rezone 3. 2. Environmental Checklist 4. Staff will calculate applicable fees and postaqe: $ AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I, (Print Name/s) Rebecca Lind , declare that I am (please check one) _ the current owner of the property involved in this application or _X_ the authorized representative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Rebecca Lind (Signature of Owner/Representative) (Signature of Owner/Representative) Q:web/pw/devserv/forms/p\anning/masterapp.doc I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that ---:--:---:--:-_--:---:--,--_.,.-:-....,., signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. 09/22/05 FALK II ANNEXATION PREZONE PROJECT NARRATIVE AND PROPOSAL SUMMARY The applicants for the proposed Falk II Annexation have requested that the City prezone the subject site in advance of annexation, pursuant to RCW 35A.14.330, so zoning will be in place at the time the subject site comes into the City. This site is adjacent to City Limits on two sides and is bordered by 1 02nd Ave SE on the east. Annexation is considered exempt from SEP A. However, the prezoning of the subject 6.29-acre area does require SEPA review. The City is proposing to prezone the proposed annexation area R-8. This corresponds with the Residential Single Family designation in Renton's Comprehensive Plan. The proposed prezone is considered a non-project action under SEPA. Surrounding zoning to the north and west is Renton R-8 residential 8 units per net acre, and King County R-6, residential 6 units per gross acre lies to the east and south. Currently five single-family housing units exist in this area. At full build out it is estimated there will be 40 homes. Since this prezone is a non-project proposal, development of additional housing units will be subject to additional project specific review at the time of development. Falk II Annexation Prezone Justification The area proposed for prezoning has already been designated for Residential Single Family in the Renton Comprehensive Plan. King County's Comprehensive Plan has designated the area for urban development at a density of 4-12 dwelling units per gross acre. R-8 zoning of this property would be consistent with both Comprehensive Plans. Renton's zoning uses net developable area to determine project density, not gross developable area. This results in less intensive development adjacent to sensitive areas. With current bonuses and incentives, King County zoning at 6 units per gross acre can easily be increased to over 8 units per acre. This is comparable to Renton's proposed zoning of 8 units per acre. DEVELOPMENT PlANNING CITY OF RENTON OCT 032005 RECEIVED -~--------l h St Falk II Annexation o Proposed Zoning Map ~c: - - -City Limits c=:J R·8 Zoning 600 1200 cc::tc;;c;:::c:::I::Hccc:::;::::::cc:c::a;~ 1 : 7200 Ul C]) > « DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON OCT 032005 City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 REmBV&1= OF CHECKLIST: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21 C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. H:\EDNSP\PAA\Annexations\Falk II\SEPA Checklist.doc A. BACKGROUND 1 . Name of proposed project, if applicable: Falk /I Annexation prezone. R-8 prezoning of approximately 13 acres. 2. Name of applicant: City of Renton 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Economic Development Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Renton City Hall, ffh Floor 1055 South Grad Way Renton, WA 98055 Contact: Don Erickson, Senior Planner Phone: (425) 430-6581 4. Date checklist prepared: September 22, 2005 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): NI A non-project action 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. NIA non-project action 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. NIA non-project action 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No. 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. H:\EDNSP\P AA \Annexations\Falk I1\SEPA Checklist.doc 2 City Council must give approval of the annexation and zoning. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. This non-project action includes pre-zoning approximately 6.29 acres to R-8 in Renton's Potential Annexation Area currently being considered for annexation using the 50150 Direct Petition method. Under RCW 43.21.C.222 annexations are specifically exempted from SEPA. RCW 35.A.14.330-340 provides for rezoning potential annexation areas. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. SW 114 of Section 32, Township 23 N, Range 5E. North of SE 164th Street, South and West of Renton City Limits. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other _____ _ This site is relatively flat with a gentle upward slope from the west to the east. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) Approximately 2%. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. NIA non-project action d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. NIA e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. NI A non-project action H:\EDNSP\P AA \Annexations\Falk I1\SEPA Checklist.doc 3 f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. NIA non-project action g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? NIA non-project action h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: NIA non-project action 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (Le., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. NIA non-project action b. Are there any off-site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. NIA non-project action c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: NIA non-project action 3. WATER a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. NIA non-project action. H:\EDNSP\P AA \Annexations\Falk II\SEPA Checklist.doc 4 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. NIA non-project action 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. NIA non-project action 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year flood plain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. NIA non-project action b. Ground Water: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. NIA non-project action 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals ... ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. NIA non-project action c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters, If so, describe. NIA non-project action 2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. NIA non-project action H:\EDNSP\P AA \Annexations\Falk II\SEPA Checklist.doc 5 d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: NIA non-project action 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: ...x..-deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other ...x..-evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other ...x..-shrubs ...x..-grass __ pasture __ crop or grain __ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other __ water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other __ other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? NIA non-project action c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: NIA non-project action 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: ........ ~~~~~~~..!..\;I.IoUUo'~ther _______ _ b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain No. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: NIA non-project action H:\EDNSP\P AA \Annexations\Falk II\SEPA Checklist.doc 6 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. NIA non-project action b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. NIA non-project action c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: NI A non-project action 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. NI A non-project action 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. NI A non-project action 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: NIA non-project action b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? NIA non-project action 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. NIA non-project action H:\EDNSP\P AA \Annexations\Falk I1\SEPA Checklist.doc 7 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: N/A non-project action 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The current use of this area is primarily for detached single-family residences. There are currently 5 single-family residences. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No. c. Describe any structures on the site. There are 5 detached single-family residences on this site, some with accessory buildings/garages. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? This is a non-project action and it is unlikely that any of the structures will be demolished. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? King County, R-6, 6 units per gross acre. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Renton Residential Single Family g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? This is a non-project action. It is expected that at full build out this area would contain 40 single family homes, or approximately 88 persons would reside in the area at full build out. H:\EDNSP\P AA \Annexations\Falk II\SEPA Checklist.doc 8 j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? NIA non-project action k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: NIA non-project action I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The proposed prezoning will help ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any. 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. This is a non-project action. Currently there are 5 single-family dwelling units on this site. At full build out this area could contain a maximum of 40 single-family homes. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. NIA non-project action. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: NIA non-project action 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. NIA non-project action b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? NIA non-project action c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: NIA non-project action 11. LIGHT AND GLARE H:\EDNSP\P AA \Annexations\Falk: II\SEPA Checklist.doc 9 a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? NIA non-project action b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? NIA non-project action c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? NIA non-project action d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: NIA non-project action 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? This is a non-project action. The project is more than a mile away from the nearest City or County park. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. NIA non-project action c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: NIA non-project action. Future development would be required to pay Renton's Parks Mitigation Fee. 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. NIA non-project action b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. NIA non-project action H:\EDNSP\P AA \Annexations\Falk II\SEPA Checklist.doc 10 c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: NIA non-project action 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The site is served by 102'd Ave SE. This is a non-project proposal. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? No. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? NIA non-project action d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private? NIA non-project action. Future development must comply with Renton's Development Regulations. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. NIA non-project action f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Assuming the most likely scenario of 40 units at full development it is estimated that there would be approximately 400 A WDTE. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: NIA non-project action 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. H:\EDNSP\P AA \Annexations\Falk II\SEPA Checklist.doc 11 NIA non-project action. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. NIA non-project action 16. UTILITIES a. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. NIA non-project action c. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: Name Printed: Rebecca Lind for City of Renton Date: H:\EDNSP\P AA \Annexations\Falk I1\SEPA Checklist.doc 12 D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEETS FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (These sheets should only be used for actions involving decisions on policies, plans and ro rams. You do not need to fill out these sheets for ro·ect actions. Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? It is unlikely that the proposal would have any affect on the above environmental issues. Additional residential development is likely to occur on this site with or without the proposal. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: New development resulting as a consequence of these proposed amendments would be required to comply with the City's development regulations, including the City's Critical Areas Ordinance. 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? There would be no affect on plants, animals, fish, or marine life as a direct consequence of this non-project, prezoning proposal. There may be some displacement of existing vegetation to clear undeveloped lots for future development, which is likely to occur under the both the present conditions and the proposal. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: None at this non-project level. Development of additional dwelling units under this proposal must comply with City of Renton regulations and with Renton's Critical Areas Ordinance. Any measures needed in this regard will be implemented at the project level review. 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? The proposed non-project action will not deplete energy or natural resources. Future project level development may impact energy or natural resources slightly but will not deplete them. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: None are proposed at this non-project action stage. 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, flood plains, or prime farmlands? H:\EDNSP\P AA \Annexations\Falk I1\SEPA Checklist.doc 13 This proposal would likely not use or affect environmentally sensitive areas. At such time that additional dwelling units are developed on this site, they will be subject to City of Renton critical area regulations and development standards that are designed to protect environmentally sensitive areas. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: NIA. 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? The proposed prezoning of this area will increase compatibility with the surrounding uses since it will limit future development to single-family detached housing currently prevalent in the area. King County zoning allows both detached and attached units in its R-8 zone. Additionally, the County R-6 zone is based on gross density, and can be easily bon used to more than 8 dwelling units per acre. Renton's zoning is based on net density, so Renton R-8 zoning is actually about the same, or a slightly lower intensity use of the land than County zoning. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: None. 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? At current levels of development there are 5 units and approximately 50 AWDVTE in this area. Additional development is likely to occur in this area with or without the proposal. At full development there is a potential for 40 units, or 400 AWDVTE at maximum development. These additional trips are likely to be generated due to the likelihood of development of this area with or without the proposal. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: None. 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. The proposal will not conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for protection of the environment. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. H:\EDNSP\P AA \Annexations\Falk II\SEPA Checklist.doc 14 Proponent: Name Printed: Rebecca Lind for City of Renton Date: I 7 H:\EDNSP\P AA \Annexations\Falk II\SEPA Checklist.doc 15