Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
East Renton Interceptor Selection of Preferred Alternative Site (1/11/1993)
WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: • Office of the dty Berk ° t. C • Renton Municipal Bulla„, / w l ': 200 Mill Avenue South Renton,WA 98055 Filed for Record at Request of Name CITY OF RENTON RECEIVED Address 200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH SEP 2 1994 City and State RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 KING COUNTY ATTN: DAVID M. CHRISTENSEN RECORDER TEMPORARY EASEMENT AND AGREEMENT M. A. SEGALE, INC., a Washington corporation ("Grantor"), for and in consideration of Ten Dollars. ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, conveys and quitclaims to THE CITY OF RENTON, a Washington municipal corporation ("Grantee"), for the purpose hereunder specifically set forth, a temporary nonexclusive easement ("Temporary Easement")under, across and over certain real property, consisting of the three(3) areas described herein 1Zr as the Hillside Section,the Maplewood Section and East Renton Interceptor Section, (collectively referred to herein as the "Temporary Easement Area") in the City of Renton, King County, Washington, all as more particularly described on EXHIBIT "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. O Said three (3) areas being so divided for the purpose of timing and scheduling of work for the sewer interceptor project. crd 1. Purpose. 1.1. Hillside Section. For the purpose of serving the real property described on EXHIBIT "B" with sanitary sewer and in order to extend and expand sanitary sewer service provided by the City of Renton, Grantee shall have a temporary nonexclusive easement under, across and over the Hillside Section of the Temporary Easement Area ("Hillside Section TEA") to construct an underground sanitary sewer line under the Hillside Section TEA together with all necessary appurtenances therefor, which may include but are not limited to underground vaults and manholes (the "Hillside Section Improvements"). 1.2. Maplewood Diversion Section. For the purpose of serving the real property described on EXHIBIT "B" with sanitary sewer and in order to extend and expand-sanitary sewer service provided by the City of Renton (including but not limited to providing connection tees to serve said property as described in Section 2.3 below), Grantee shall have a temporary nonexclusive easement under, across and over the Maplewood Diversion Section of the Temporary Easement Area("Maplewood Diversion Section TEA") to construct an underground sanitary sewer line under the Maplewood Diversion Section TEA together with all necessary appurtenances therefor, which may include but are not limited to underground CG vaults and manholes (the "Maplewood Section Improvements"). caca 1.3. East Renton Interceptor Section. For the purpose of serving the real property described on EXHIBIT "B" with sanitary sewer and in order to extend and expand sanitary sewer service provided by the City of Renton (including but not limited to providing connection tees to serve said property as described in Section 2.4.2 below) Grantee shall have a temporary nonexclusive easement under, across a_ and over the East Renton Interceptor Section of the Temporary Easement Area("East Renton Interceptor Section TEA"), to construct an underground sanitary sewer line under the East Renton Interceptor TEA together with all necessary appurtenances therefor, which may include but are not limited to underground vaults and manholes (the "East Renton Interceptor Section Improvements"). ti TEMPORARY EASEMENT AND AGREEMENT EXCISE TAX NOT REQUIRED o Grantor: M. A. Segal; Inc. King CO,}�7..rds Division Grantee: City of Renton j Page 1 of 8 Deputy 2. Representations of Grantee. In consideration of the rights herein granted, and as a material condition of this temporary easement, Grantee makes the following representations. 2.1. Sanitary Sewer Service. As partial consideration for this Easement, Grantee, following due inquiry, represents and warrants that as of the date hereof it is unaware of any facts,or circumstances which would cause the real property described on EXHIBIT "B" to be subjected to any moratorium or prohibition of development resulting from lack of sewer service to said property, excepting only completion of the Hillside Section Improvements and the Maplewood Section Improvements. 2.2. Hillside Section. Grantee represents and warrants that with respect to the Hillside Section Improvements as described above, Grantee's project to accomplish the same is fully funded; plans and specifications necessary and appropriate to complete the same have been prepared and approved as required by applicable laws, rules and regulations; all such project work has been scheduled; and a contract for completion of such project work has been entered into by Grantee. 2.3. Maplewood Diversion Section. Grantee represents and warrants that with respect to the Maplewood Section Improvements as described above, Grantee's project to accomplish the same is fully funded; plans and specifications necessary and appropriate to complete the same have been prepared and approved as required by applicable laws, rules and regulations; all such project work has been scheduled; and a contract for completion of such project work, including provision to Grantor at Grantee's expense, of not less than forty-four (44) nor more than fifty (50) connection tees to serve the real property described on EXHIBIT "B", has been entered into by.Grantee. 2.4. East Renton Interceptor Section. Grantee represents and warrants that with respect to the t East Renton Interceptor Section Improvements as described above, Grantee shall: e-4 2.4.1. cause the same to be designed and sized to accommodate at a minimum the needs ® of all of the real propertydescribed on EXHIBIT "B" (excepting only such portions of said real property as may be served by the completed Maplewood Diversion Section Improvements described above), as if developed to its highest and best use as the same may be determined by <7) Grantor; 2.4.2. cause the same to be designed to provide, at Grantee's expense, not less than ninety-two (92) nor more than one hundred (100) connection tees to facilitate the provision of sanitary service to benefit the portion of the real property described on EXHIBIT "B" which is the subject of the East Renton Interceptor TEA and Grantor's real property which is adjacent to the same; 2.4.3. use its best efforts to develop and obtain approval of plans and specifications necessary and appropriate to complete the same as required by applicable laws, rules and regulations; . 2.4.4. use its best efforts to obtain capital improvement funding from public funding sources sufficient to complete or to augment other funding sources utilized to complete the same; 2.4.5. schedule, enter into an agreement to design, and complete said project, in such manner as to avoid interference with and/or delay of, Grantor's use and development of the real property described on EXHIBIT "B", provided however, that in any event, completion shall occur not later than March 31, 1996, at which time, if the East Renton Interceptor Section TEMPORARY EASEMENT AND AGREEMENT Grantor: M. A. Segale, Inc. Grantee: City of Renton Page2of8 Improvements are not completed, the Temporary Easement evidenced by this instrument shall, in its entirety, cease and be of no further force of effect. • 3. Representations of Grantor. Grantor represents that it is the owner of the real property described on EXHIBIT "B" (the "Property") and has full right and authority to convey the easement and rights herein granted. 4. Term. This Temporary Easement shall be for a term expiring at midnight on March 31, 1996. 5. Grantee to Construct Line. In consideration of the rights herein granted, Grantee agrees to complete construction on or before April 30, 1995, of the Hillside Section Improvements and the Maplewood Diversion Line Improvements and cause the same to be fully operational and capable of accommodating a connection sized to serve the Property, provided however, that such date may be extended on account'of force majeure delays occasioned to Grantee,upon Grantor's prior written consent, whichconsent shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. In order to obtain Grantor's consent to extend the completion date, Grantee shall provide written notice to Grantor setting forth the force majeure reason for the requested extension and the requested revised completion date. For.purposes of this Section, Grantee understands and agrees that no extension shall be granted on account of lack of funds. If Grantor has not responded to Grantee's notice herein within thirty (30) days following its receipt thereof,then Grantee's request shall be deemed granted. Prior to commencement of any work hereunder, including but not limited to clearing, grubbing, grading or excavation, Grantee shall obtain Grantor's written approval of the plans and specifications pertaining to all work to be performed on the Temporary Easement Area, including, without limitation: the size and capacity of all sewer facilities to be installed thereon by Grantee pursuant to this Temporary Easement; and the number (which shall be not less than - forty-four (44) nor more than fifty (50)), design, and location of four-inch (4") connection tees to be installed to facilitate connection to planned future lots fronting the Maplewood Diversion Line kr Improvements. Review by Grantor shall not unduly delay Grantee's work. Grantee shall install not less than forty-four (44) nor more than fifty (50) such connection tees at Grantee's expense and upon Grantor's request and at locations designated by Grantor. Any such connection tees in excess of forty- "4 four (44) which may be requested by Grantor, shall be installed by Grantee at Grantor's expense. 6. Revised Temporary Easement. C7'S 6.1. Completion of Hillside and Maplewood Diversion Section Improvements; Revised Temporary Easement. 6.1.1. It is understood and agreed that following completion of construction of the Hillside Section Improvements and Maplewood Diversion Section Improvements, Grantee will no longer require a temporary easement one hundred feet(100')in width. Accordingly,the width of the Temporary Easement Area along the Hillside Section and Maplewood Diversion Section will be revised following completion of construction of the Hillside Section Improvements and Maplewood Diversion Section Improvements. 6.1.2. Not later than thirty (30) calendar days following completion of the Hillside Section Improvements and Maplewood Diversion Line Improvements, Grantee shall notify Grantor in writing that construction of said line is complete and that said line is fully operational. Said notice shall include a complete set of as-built drawings on Autocad of each of said Hillside Section Improvements and Maplewood Diversion Section Improvements. Grantor shall review said as-built drawings and if Grantor approves of such as-builts, then Grantor.and Grantee shall execute and deliver to Grantee for recording, a revised temporary nonexclusive easement under, across and over the Hillside Section Final Easement TEMPORARY EASEMENT AND AGREEMENT Grantor: M. A. Segale, Inc. Grantee: City of Renton Page3of8 Area and Maplewood Diversion Section Final Easement Area (as generally described on EXHIBIT "C" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference). As-built information to be provided to Grantor will consist of final horizontal and vertical data for the sewer main and manholes. Tees will be located by horizontal reference to the as-built manholes. Grantor's review of the as-builts shall not unduly delay Grantee's work. Said Revised Temporary Easement shall be for a term expiring March 31, 1996, at which time all of Grantee's right,title, and interest under the Revised Temporary Easement terminate and have no further force and effect. 6.2. Completion of East Renton Interceptor Section Improvements: Revised Temporary Easement. 6.2.1. It is understood and agreed that following completion of construction of the East Renton Interceptor Section Improvements, Grantee will no longer require a temporary easement one hundred feet (100') in width along the East Renton Interceptor Section. Accordingly, the width of the Temporary Easement Area along the East Renton Interceptor Section will be revised following completion of construction of the East Renton Interceptor Section Improvements. 6.2.2. Not later than thirty (30) calendar days following completion of the East Renton Interceptor Section Improvements, Grantee shall notify Grantor in writing that construction of said line is complete and that said line is fully operational. Said notice shall include a complete set of as-built , drawings on Autocad of such Improvements. Grantor shall review said as-built drawings and if Grantor approves of such as-builts, then Grantor shall execute and deliver to Grantee for recording, a permanent nonexclusive easement under, across and over the Hillside Section Final Easement Area, Maplewood Diversion Section Final Easement Area, and East Renton Interceptor Section Final Easement Area (as generally described on EXHIBIT "C" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference). Grantor's review of the as-built drawings shall not unduly delay Grantee's work. As-built conditions set 4-4 forth in Section 6.1.2 shall apply to this Section. 7. Permanent Easement. The permanent easement shall be in a form provided by Grantor. 7.1. The Permanent Easement form shall incorporate all as-built drawings approved by Grantor Cd' pursuant to Sections 6.1.2 and 6.2.2. The Permanent Easement form shall incorporate the Hillside Section Final Easement Area, Maplewood Diversion Section Final Easement Area, and East Renton Interceptor Section Final Easement Area. 7.2. The Permanent Easement form shall provide that the consideration for same shall be NINETY-THOUSAND DOLLARS ($90,000.00), which shall be provided to Grantor, its successors and/or assigns in the form of a credit for future sanitary sewer connections for the Property("Connection Credit"). One hundred twenty (120) days following completion of the Hillside Section Improvements, Maplewood Diversion Section Improvements and East Renton Interceptor Section Improvements, Grantee shall establish a fee("Special Assessment District Fee") chargeable to all real property benefitted by such improvements (the"Final East Renton Interceptor Special Assessment District 0002 Fee"). For purposes of this Temporary Easement and Agreement, it is understood and agreed that the Final East Renton Interceptor Special Assessment District 0002 Fee shall mean the fee as first finally established, and without the inclusion of any interest. The Connection Credit shall be determined by dividing the sum of $90,000.00 by the Final East Renton Interceptor Special Assessment District 0002 Fee applicable to the use for which connections will be required to serve the Property. The result shall be the number of connections to be provided to the Property at no charge to Grantor and without assessment against the Property, irrespective of the date upon which such connections are made, provided however, if the result is not a whole number, then Grantee shall pay to Grantor, in cash, the portion of$90,000.00 which was TEMPORARY EASEMENT AND AGREEMENT Grantor: M. A. Segale, Inc. Grantee: City of Renton Page 4 of 8 not evenly divisible as provided in this Section. 8. Access. Grantee shall have the right of access over and across the Property in the specific area described on EXHIBIT "D" to enable Grantee to exercise its rights under Sections 1.1, 1.2 and 1.3 hereof, provided,that Grantee shall compensate Grantor for any damages to any pavement or landscaping located on the Temporary Easement Area and for any damage to Grantor's adjacent real property and/or improvements caused by the exercise of such rights of access. 9. Disposal of excess fill. Any material excavated from the Property in connection with the rights granted hereunder, shall be deposited, stockpiled and/or otherwise placed on the Property in compliance with all provisions hereof and consistent with Grantor's specific direction respecting such material. 10. Compliance with Laws and Rules. Grantee shall construct, maintain, remove, repair, replace and use the Improvements, and shall exercise any and all rights hereunder, in accordance with the requirements of all applicable federal, state, and local laws, rules and regulations, including without limitation, the orders, rules and/or regulations of any public authority having jurisdiction. Grantee shall ensure that all work is performed in strict compliance with the plans and specifications approved for same, and in as safe a manner as is possible, and otherwise in accordance with safety and other guidelines and directives provided by the Washington State Department of Labor and Industries and by any other governmental entities authorized to enact safety guidelines relating to the work to be performed hereunder. Grantee expressly covenants and agrees that no liens of mechanics, materialmen, laborers, architects, artisans, contractors, subcontractors or any other lien of any kind whatsoever shall be created against or imposed upon the Property and arising out of Grantee's fulfillment of its obligations or exercise C of its rights hereunder. It is understood and agreed that in the event any such lien is recorded, Grantee shall have a reasonable time not to exceed thirty (30) days following Grantee's knowledge of said lien, to have said lien released of record. ® 11. Environmental Conditions; Hazardous Substances. 11.1. Grantee shall not keep, use, dispose of, release, transport, generate and/or sell on or about the Property any substance now or hereafter defined or designated as a hazardous waste, a hazardous substance, a toxic substance or as a pollutant or contaminant, under any federal, state, or local law, regulations, statute or ordinance (referred to in this document as "Hazardous Substances") in violation of any environmentally related federal, state or local law, regulations, statute or ordinance. 11.2. Grantee shall comply with all federal, state and local laws, regulations, statutes and ordinances concerning Hazardous Substances. Grantee shall promptly notify Grantor of any spill or release upon discovery of any such spill or release of Hazardous Substances which are required to be reported to any federal, state, or local regulatory agency. Grantee shall promptly notify Grantor of: 11.2.1. Any failure of Grantee to comply with any federal, state or local law, regulation or ordinance as now enacted or as subsequently enacted or amended, which failure relates to the Property or this Temporary Easement. 11.2.2. All inspections of the Property by any regulatory entity concerning any failure by Grantee as described in Section 11.2.1 above; 11.2.3. Any regulatory orders or fines imposed upon, applicable to, or levied against Grantee respecting Grantee's use, disposal, release, transport, generation or selling of Hazardous Substances in connection with Grantee's rights hereunder; TEMPORARY EASEMENT AND AGREEMENT Grantor: M. A. Segale, Inc. - Grantee: City of Renton Page 5 of 8 • 11.2.4. All response or interim clean-up actions taken by or proposed to be taken by any governmental entity or private party (including Grantee) relating to Grantee's use, disposal, release, transport, generation or selling of Hazardous Substances in connection with Grantee's rights hereunder; and 11.2.5. Any negotiations with any regulatory entity for a consent decree or order under any authority for or concerning any plans for remedial action at the Property. Grantee shall notify Grantor of any order issued to the Grantee by any third party concerning Hazardous Substances at the Property. 12. Obstructions. Grantee may from time to time remove trees,bushes, or other obstructions within the Temporary Easement Area (if any) and may level the Temporary Easement Area to the extent reasonably necessary to carry out the purposes set forth in Section 1 hereof, provided that following such, work Grantee shall restore the Temporary Easement Area and pavement, landscaping or improvements located thereon, to their condition immediately prior to such work and consistent with plans approved by Grantor. Following installation of the Improvements, Grantor may undertake any improvements to the Temporary Easement Area provided that such improvements are not inconsistent with Grantee's rights hereunder. 13. Grantor's Use of Temporary Easement Area. Grantor may use the Temporary Easement Area for any purposes not inconsistent with the rights herein granted,provided that Grantor shall not construct or maintain any building or other structure on the Temporary Easement Area which would interfere with the exercise of the rights herein granted. Grantor reserves all rights'with respect to and including the Temporary Easement Area and its adjacent real property, including,without limitation,the right to grant easements, licenses and permits to others subject to the rights granted herein. 14. Grantee's Agreement and Indemnity. By executing this Temporary Easement, Grantee does hereby: (a) agree to allprovisions contained in this instrument; and (b) release, indemnify and promise e� g ‘1' to defend and save harmless Grantor from and against any and all liability, loss, cost, damage, expense, actions and claims, costs (including fees of consultants and experts), and reasonable attorneys' fees to the extent of the negligence of Grantee in Grantee's exercise of its rights or fulfillment of its obligations hereunder. Grantee shall not be required to indemnify Grantor against liability for, any portion of the damages (if any) caused by or resulting from the negligence of Grantor. 15. Abandonment. The rights herein granted shall continue until such time as Grantee ceases to use the Temporary Easement Area for a period of one (1)year,,in which event this easement shall terminate and have no further force and effect, provided however, in such event Grantee shall not be released or deemed released from any liability or obligation with respect to any matter occurring prior to such termination, nor shall such termination release Grantee from its obligation and liability to remove the Improvements from the Temporary Easement Area and restore the ground, and all obligations of Grantee hereunder shall survive such termination. This Section shall not be deemed to preclude the Grantee's right to obtain a Permanent Easement(as herein defined) for its facilities if Grantee meets the conditions contained in this Temporary Easement and Agreement. 16. Notices. All notices under this Temporary Easement and Agreement shall be in writing and delivered in person or sent by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, and addressed to Grantor and Grantee at the addresses hereinafter set forth or such other addresses as may from time to time be designated by either party in writing and pursuant to this Section. Notices mailed as aforesaid shall be deemed given on the date received as evidenced by the return receipt. TEMPORARY EASEMENT AND AGREEMENT Grantor: M.A. Segale, Inc. Grantee: City of Renton Page 6 of 8 • Grantor: Grantee: M. A. Segale, Inc. CITY OF RENTON ATTN: George L. Hull ATTN: David M. Christensen P. O. Box 88050 200 Mill Avenue South Tukwila, Washington 98138 Renton, Washington 98055 17. Successors and Assigns. The rights and obligations of the parties shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon their respective successors and assigns. 18. Relocation of Improvements. Grantor hereby reserves the right, at its election and at its sole cost and expense, subject to applicable regulations, to relocate the Improvements. Any such relocation shall be subject to Grantee's prior review and approval. Grantee agrees to promptly review and approve any such relocation provided that the functionality of the proposed.relocated improvements is equal to the functionality of theoriginal improvements as initially constructed. EFFECTIVE as of the 15th day of September, 1994. GRANTOR: M. A. SEGALE, INC., a Washington corporation ,I By: M. A. Segal c4 Title: President t4' GRANTEE: Cr) CITY OF RENTON, a Washington municipal corporation By: rQA Earl Clymer Title: Mayor 441/11111 ATTEST 1 Q.CCI, '121-1/ Marilyn . • tersen, City Clerk TEMPORARY EASEMENT AND AGREEMENT Grantor: M. A. Segale, Inc. Grantee: City of Renton Page7of8 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. COUNTY OF KING ) On this \crY day of , 194 , before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared M. A. Segale, to me known to be the President of M. A. Segale, Inc., the corporation that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned; and on oath stated that he was duly elected, qualified and acting as said officer or the corporation and that he was authorized to execute the said instrument on behalf of M. A. Segale, Inc. and that the seal affixed, if any, is the corporate seal of the corporation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have hereunto set my hand and official seal the day and year first above written...•.: . . , - \F A. P/N 4111Ny- .w. ` Si;nature • .to P ti , o e-i A. i>I f`�f l-2U e Printor stamp name of Notary o, 1Q�a° Notary Public in and for the� State of Washington, ,61 6� �;'�����, �o residing at /yo • ��`� .. My commission expires L I I0 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. rsi COUNTY OF KING ) On this oZ day ofip -r', 19/V, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared 5‘0,/ C/ynn-er yn R: rs-esz , to me known to be thee'$ CArk of the City of Renton, a Washington municipal corporation, the corporation that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned; and on oath stated that M curry- was duly elected, authorized, qualified and acting in said capacity and that '"- I ithorized to execute the said instrument on behalf of the City of Renton and that the seal affixed, if any, is the corporate seal of the corporation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have hereunto set my hand and official seal the day and year first above written. Sign ture of Notary 1_J54 S i Ef iV S Print or stamp name of Notary Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at ffEN Z7A1 My commission expires 7 /9-97 TEMPORARY EASEMENT AND AGREEMENT Grantor: M. A. Segale, Inc. Grantee: City of Renton Page 8 of 8 EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF TEMPORARY EASEMENT AREA The Temporary Easement Area consists of three sections, the HILLSIDE SECTION TEMPORARY EASEMENT AREA, MAPLEWOOD DIVERSION SECTION TEMPORARY EASEMEMT AREA and EAST RENTON INTERCEPTOR SECTION TEMPORARY EASEMENT AREA, described as follows: HILLSIDE SECTION TEMPORARY EASEMENT AREA Concerning that portion of the East Renton Interceptor between manholes ERI-2and ERI-5, consisting of approximately 1,022 IF. A STRIP OF LAND ONE HUNDRED(100)FEET IN.WIDTH HAVING FIFTY(50)FEET OF SUCH WIDTH ON EACH SIDE OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED CENTERLINE WHICH LIES WITHIN A PORTION OF SECTION 16,TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH,RANGE 5 EAST,W.M., IN KING COUNTY WASHINGTON: COMMENCING AT THE CENTER OF SAID SECTION 16; THENCE SOUTH 01°04'18"WEST ALONG THE NORTH/SOUTH CENTERLINE OF SECTION 16, 92.38 FEET; THENCE NORTH 74°50'22" WEST 89.02 FEET; CD THENCE SOUTH 78°21'15" WEST 318.07 FEET; grii cf' THENCE SOUTH 09°11'26" WEST 232.72 FEET; 0 THENCE SOUTH 73°46'47" WEST 201.58 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 68°53'02" WEST 189.16 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 60°16'39" WEST 152.54 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°29'43"WEST 251.84 FEET TO A POINT DESIGNATED AS POINT_ "A" AND. THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE CENTERLINE: THENCE SOUTH 09°32'57" EAST 488.99 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 46°45'52" WEST 348.37 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 17°02'43" WEST 59.39 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY MARGIN OF SR 169 (MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY) AND THE TERMINUS OF SAID CENTERLINE. EXHIBIT "A"to TEMPORARY EASEMENT AND AGREEMENT Pagelof3 MAPLEWOOD DIVERSION SECTION TEMPORARY EASEMENT AREA Concerning that portion of the Maplewood diversion line between manholes ERI-5 and MWD-8, consisting of approximately 1,611 LF. A STRIP.OF LAND ONE HUNDRED(100)FEET IN WIDTH HAVING FIFTY (50)FEET OF SUCH WIDTH ON EACH SIDE OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED CENTERLINE WHICH LIES WITHIN A PORTION OF THE WEST V2 OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON: COMMENCING AT THE CENTER OF SAID SECTION 16: THENCE SOUTH 01°04'18"WEST ALONG THE NORTH/SOUTH CENTERLINE OF SECTION 16,. 92.38 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF SAID CENTERLINE; THENCE NORTH 74°50'22" WEST 89.02 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 78°21'15" WEST 318.07 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 09°11'26" WEST 232.72 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 73°46'47" WEST 201.58 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 68°53'02" WEST 189.16 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 60°16'39" WEST 152.54 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°29'43"WEST 251.84 FEET TO A POINT DESIGNATED AS POINT "A" AND " THE TERMINUS OF SAID CENTERLINE. SAID TERMINUS POINT BEARS SOUTH 64°36'05" WEST 1,318.06 FEET FROM THE CENTER OF SAID SECTION 16. EXHIBIT "A" to TEMPORARY EASEMENT AND AGREEMENT Page 2 of 3 EAST RENTON INTERCEPTOR SECTION TEMPORARY EASEMENT AREA Concerning that portion of the East Renton Interceptor Line between manholes ERI-5 and ERI-12, consisting of approximately 3,407LF. A STRIP OF LAND ONE HUNDRED (100)FEET IN WIDTH HAVING FIFTY (50)FEET OF SUCH WIDTH ON EACH SIDE OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED CENTERLINE WHICH LIES WITHIN A PORTION OF THE WEST th OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 16; THENCE SOUTH 01°05'10" WEST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 928.67 FEET TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTHERLY MARGIN OF NE 3RD STREET(3RD AVENUE EXTENSION); THENCE NORTH 71°30'26" EAST 459.39 FEET; THENCE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT WITH A RADIUS OF 1,095.92 FEET WHOSE CENTER BEARS SOUTH 18°23'34"EAST THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 02°06'00"A DISTANCE OF 40.17 FEET; THENCE NORTH 73°36'26"EAST 223.14 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF SAID CENTERLINE; THENCE SOUTH 13°53'02" EAST 202.82 FEET; Tei Kr THENCE SOUTH 76°06'58" WEST 260.66 FEET; CD THENCE SOUTH'06°42'06" WEST 591.25 FEET;gral THENCE SOUTH 55°41'44" EAST 565.59 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 34°18'16" WEST 441.23 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 06°15'03" EAST 183.76 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 54°26'53" EAST 432.88 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 15°47'57" EAST 133.29 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 35°44'16" EAST 550.19 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°38'06" EAST 67.27 FEET TO A POINT DESIGNATED AS POINT "A" AND THE TERMINUS OF SAID CENTERLINE. SAID TERMINUS POINT BEARS-SOUTH 64°36'05" WEST 1,318.06 FEET FROM THE CENTER OF SECTION 16. EXHIBTT "A"to TEMPORARY EASEMENT AND AGREEMENT Page 3 of 3 EXHIBIT "B" LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF GRANTOR'S REAL PROPERTY PARCEL 1: THE SOUTH 80 FEET OF THE WEST 179 FEET OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST W.M.; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. PARCEL 2: THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST W.M.; EXCEPT ALL COAL AND MINERALS AND THE RIGHT TO EXPLORE FOR AND MINE THE SAME, AS RESERVED BY DEED RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 4264136; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. PARCEL 3: THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST W.M.; LYING NORTHERLY OF A LINE DESCRIBED KT AS FOLLOWS: N 1°4 BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE NORTH 01°3'30" EAST 380.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF SAID LINE; O THENCE NORTH 68°11'47" EAST 1,440.75 FEET TO A POINT, ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION,SOUTH 1°4'40" WEST 380.00 FEET FROM THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION AND THE TERMINUS OF SAID LINE; (BEING ALSO KNOWN AS PARCEL 1 OF UNRECORDED SURVEY DATED JULY 16, 1991); EXCEPT ALL COAL AND MINERALS AND THE RIGHT TO EXPLORE FOR AND MINE THE SAME, AS RESERVED BY DEED RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 4592023; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. PARCEL 4: THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST W.M.; EXCEPT ALL COAL AND MINERALS AND THE RIGHT TO EXPLORE FOR AND MINE THE EXHIBIT "B" to TEMPORARY EASEMENT AND AGREEMENT Page 1 of 4 SAME, AS RESERVED BY DEED RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 3201134; 0 SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. PARCEL 5: THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH,RANGE 5 EAST W.M.;LYING NORTHERLY OF THE RENTON-MAPLE VALLEY ROAD NO. 1140 AND NORTHERLY OF STATE ROAD NO.5(SR169)AS CONDEMNED UNDER KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NO. 757887 (ITEM NO. 6) AND LYING EASTERLY OF A LINE DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 979.58 FEET EAST OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE NORTH 13°44'55" WEST TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION, AND THE TERMINUS OF SAID LINE; EXCEPT THE WEST 100.00 FEET OF THE EAST 300.00 FEET THEREOF; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. PARCEL 6: THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 6, SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 4' EAST W.M.; DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 6, WHERE IT IS INTERSECTED BY THE Irr NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF DEFENSE PLANT CORP. RIGHT-OF-WAY AS SHOWN ON THE 0 PLAT OF,MAPLE DIVISION NO. 2, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 39 OF PLATS, 74 PAGE 39, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; '? THENCE NORTH 89 000'30"WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO INTERSECT THE EXTENDED C7) EASTERLY LINE OF LOT 5, IN BLOCK 4 OF SAID PLAT; THENCE SOUTH 15°38'20"WEST ALONG SAID EXTENDED LINE TO THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 5; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID BLOCK 4 TO THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF LOT 11 THEREOF; THENCE NORTH 70°36'7" EAST, 180.94 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 45°14'20"EAST,210 FEET MORE OR LESS,TO THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF THE DEFENSE PLAT CORP. RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE NORTH 52°2'30" EAST ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY LINE TO BEGINNING; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. EXHIBIT "B" to TEMPORARY EASEMENT AND AGREEMENT Page2of4 PARCEL 7: THE WEST 100.00 FEET OF THE EAST 300.00 FEET OF THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST W.M.; LYING NORTHERLY OF THE RENTON-MAPLE VALLEY ROAD NO. 1140 AND NORTHERLY OF STATE ROAD NO. 5 (SR169) AS CONDEMNED IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NO. 757887 (ITEM NO. 6); SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. PARCEL 8: THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST W.M.; LYING SOUTHERLY OF A LINE DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE NORTH 1°3'30" EAST 380.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF SAID LINE; THENCE NORTH 68°11'47" EAST 1,440.75 FEET TO A POINT, ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION,SOUTH 1°4'40"WEST 380.00 FEET FROM THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION AND THE TERMINUS OF SAID LINE; (BEING ALSO KNOWN AS PARCEL 2 OF UNRECORDED SURVEY DATED JULY 16, 1991); EXCEPT ALL COAL AND MINERALS AND THE RIGHT TO EXPLORE FOR AND MINE THE SAME, AS RESERVED BY DEED RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 4592023; CD SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. gri e+ PARCEL 9: 0 THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST,W.M.; IN KING COUNTY, STATE OF WASHINGTON, AND OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M.; IN KING COUNTY, STATE OF WASHINGTON, LYING EAST OF THE EAST LINE OF A STRIP OF LAND IN SAID SECTION 17 DEEDED TO PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT COMPANY BY DEED RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 2500774 AND SOUTH OF THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE MORE SOUTHERLY STRIP OF LAND DEEDED TO CITY OF RENTON FOR STREET BY DEED RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 5684198, EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTH 115.00 FEET OF SAID SUBDIVISION LYING WEST OF THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST 179.00 FEET OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 16, AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING EAST OF A LINE BEGINNING ON THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 16 AT A POINT 315.66 FEET WESTERLY OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER THEREOF, AND RUNNING THENCE SOUTH 1°08'26"WEST ALONG A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND 30.00 FEET EAST OF THE EAST LINE OF A TRACT OF LAND DEEDED TO STATE OF WASHINGTON BY DEED RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 3235173,A DISTANCE OF 660.30 FEET; EXHIBIT "B"to TEMPORARY EASEMENT AND AGREEMENT Page 3 of 4 THENCE NORTH 89°12'42" WEST 135.58 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 1°08'26" WEST 659.51 FEET, MORE OF LESS TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION ALSO THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M.; IN KING COUNTY, STATE OF WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION AT A POINT 373.80 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE NORTH 71°17'30" EAST 1,035.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH PARALLEL WITH THE WEST LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION TO THE SOUTH LINE OF NORTHEAST FOURTH STREET; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE 30.00 FEET, THENCE SOUTH PARALLEL WITH THE WEST LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE MORE NORTHERLY STRIP OF LAND DEEDED TO CITY OF RENTON FOR STREET BY DEED ' RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 5684198; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE TO A LINE PARALLEL WITH THE WEST LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION AND WHICH INTERSECTS THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE TO THE TRUE POINT OF.BEGINNING; TOGETHER WITH AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS OVER THE NORTH 35.00 FEET OF THE SOUTH 115.00 FEET OF THE WEST 179.00 FEET OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 16 AND OVER THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH 35.00 N FEET OF THE SOUTH 115.00 FEET OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF ei SAID SECTION 17,LYING EAST OF MT.OLIVET CEMETERY ROAD,EXCEPT THAT PORTION [r THEREOF LYING WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY DEEDED TO PUGET SOUND POWER&LIGHT 0 COMPANY, BY DEED RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 2500774. 41 PARCEL 10: (') THE NORTH 35.00 FEET OF THE SOUTH 115.00 FEET OF, THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M.; IN KING COUNTY, STATE OF WASHINGTON, LYING EAST OF THE MT. OLIVET CEMETERY ROAD; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OF PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT COMPANY 1 ALSO, THE NORTH 35.00 FEET OF THE SOUTH 115.00 FEET OF THE WEST 179.00 FEET OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M.; IN KING COUNTY, STATE OF WASHINGTON; EXHIBIT "B" to TEMPORARY EASEMENT AND AGREEMENT Page4of4 EXHIBIT "C" LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF FINAL EASEMENT AREA The Final Easement Area consists of three sections, the HILLSIDE SECTION FINAL EASEMENT AREA, MAPLEWOOD DIVERSION SECTION FINAL EASEMEMT AREA and EAST RENTON INTERCEPTOR SECTION FINAL EASEMENT AREA, described as follows: HILLSIDE SECTION FINAL EASEMENT AREA Concerning that portion of the East Renton Interceptor between manholes ERI-2 and ERI-5, consisting of approximately 1,022 IF. A STRIP OF LAND TWENTY (20) FEET IN WIDTH HAVING TEN (10) FEET OF SUCH WIDTH ON EACH SIDE OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED .CENTERLINE WHICH LIES WITHIN A PORTION OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY WASHINGTON: COMMENCING AT THE CENTER OF SAID SECTION 16; THENCE SOUTH 01°04'18"WEST ALONG THE NORTH/SOUTH CENTERLINE OF SECTION 16, 92.38 FEET; THENCE NORTH 74°50'22" WEST 89.02 FEET; Kr THENCE SOUTH 78°21'15" WEST 318.07 FEET; TATHENCE SOUTH 09°11'26" WEST 232.72 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 73°46'47" WEST 201.58 FEET; vid" THENCE SOUTH 68°53'02" WEST 189.16 FEET; 0 THENCE SOUTH 60°16'39" WEST 152.54 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°29'43"WEST 251.84 FEET TO A POINT DESIGNATED AS POINT "A" AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE CENTERLINE: THENCE SOUTH 09°32'57" EAST 488.99 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 46°45'52" WEST 348.37 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 17°02'43" WEST 59.39 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY MARGIN OF SR 169 (MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY) AND THE TERMINUS OF SAID CENTERLINE. EXHIBIT "C" to TEMPORARY EASEMENT.AND AGREEMENT Page 1 of 3 MAPLEWOOD DIVERSION SECTION FINAL EASEMENT AREA Concerning that portion of the Maplewood diversion line between manholes ERI-5 and MWD-8, consisting of approximately 1,611 LF. A STRIP OF LAND FIFTEEN(15)FEET IN WIDTH HAVING SEVEN AND ONE-HALF (7.5)FEET OF SUCH WIDTH ON EACH SIDE OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED CENTERLINE WHICH • LIES WITHIN A PORTION OF THE WEST t OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON: COMMENCING AT THE CENTER OF SAID SECTION 16: THENCE SOUTH 01°04'18"WEST ALONG THE NORTH/SOUTH CENTERLINE.OF SECTION 16, 92;38 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF SAID CENTERLINE; THENCE NORTH 74°50'22" WEST 89.02 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 78°21'15" WEST 318.07 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 09°11'26" WEST 232.72 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 73°46'47" WEST 201.58 FEET; G141 THENCE SOUTH 68°53'02" WEST 189.16 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 60°16'39" WEST 152.54 FEET; [S" ® THENCE SOUTH 89°29'43" WEST 251.84 FEET TO A POINT DESIGNATED AS POINT "A" AND THE TERMINUS OF SAID CENTERLINE. SAID TERMINUS POINT BEARS SOUTH 64°36'05" ,14 WEST 1,318.06 FEET FROM THE CENTER OF SAID SECTION 16. tIn • EXHIBIT "C" to TEMPORARY EASEMENT AND AGREEMENT Page2of3 EAST RENTON INTERCEPTOR SECTION FINAL EASEMENT AREA Concerning that portion of the East Renton Interceptor Line between manholes ERI-5 and ERI--12, consisting of approximately 3,407 LF. A STRIP OF LAND TWENTY (20) FEET IN WIDTH HAVING TEN (10) FEET OF SUCH WIDTH ON EACH SIDE OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED CENTERLINE WHICH LIES WITHIN A PORTION OF THE WEST 1/z OF SECTION 16,.TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 16; THENCE SOUTH 01°05'10" WEST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 928.67 FEET TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTHERLY MARGIN OF NE 3RD STREET(3RD AVENUE EXTENSION); THENCE NORTH 71°30'26" EAST 459.39 FEET; THENCE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT WITH A RADIUS OF 1,095.92 FEET WHOSE CENTER BEARS SOUTH 18°23'34"EAST THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 02°06'00"A DISTANCE OF 40.17 FEET; '.' THENCE NORTH 73°36'26" EAST 223.14 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF SAID vi CENTERLINE; C) THENCE SOUTH 13°53'02" EAST 202.82 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 76°06'58" WEST 260.66 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 06°42'06" WEST 591.25 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 55°41'44" EAST 565.59 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 34°18'16" WEST 441.23 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 06°15'03" EAST 183.76 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 54°26'53" EAST 432.88 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 15°47'57" EAST 133.29 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 35°44'16" EAST 550.19 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°38'06" EAST 67.27 FEET TO A POINT DESIGNATED AS POINT "A" AND THE TERMINUS OF SAID CENTERLINE. SAID TERMINUS POINT BEARS SOUTH 64°36'05" WEST 1,318.06 FEET FROM THE CENTER OF SECTION 16. • EXHIBIT "C" to TEMPORARY EASEMENT AND AGREEMENT Page 3of3 EXHIBIT "D" ACCESS TO TEMPORARY EASEMENT AREA MH ERI - 21 — l � II � fl II it ' II -- I 20 FT ACCESS ill AREA � . •-� I /// • @" SII //11C%--EAST RENTON INTERCEPTOR 11 SEWER UNE EASEMENT AREA © 11 1411 N.N. NSN \` I r MH MWD -8 • \ \\ 11 I \;\ \\ MH ERI - 5 \\ �. • II MAPLEWOOD DIVERSION I II SEWER LINE EASEMENT AREA II II PROPERTY LINE I l�— HILLSIDE SEWER LINE EASEMENT AREA '• 'I /, MH ERI - 2 • • EXHIBIT "D" to TEMPORARY EASEMENT AND AGREEMENT • Page 1of1 _...�. ® TTY: OF RENTO;N Office Of..the.Ci Attorne Earl Clymer, .Mayor. , Lawrence:J:Warren MEMORANDUM" , Tor. . Dave:Christensen;Wastewater Utility 17. From: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date: September:21;.,1994: May 24. 1993 Renton City Council Minutes Page 248 The following resolutions were presented for reading and adoption: Resolution #2978 A resolution was read establishing an errata process to review individual Comprehensive Plan: or site specific concerns relating to the implementation of the interim Errata Process land use element of the Comprehensive Plan, interim area-wide zoning, and interim zoning code. MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution #2979 A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor and city clerk to enter into Parks: Cedar River Trail an interlocal cooperative agreement with the Washington State Department Project, ALEA Grant of Transportation for recreational trail construction, maintenance, and Extension operation. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY TANNER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution #2980 A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor and city clerk to execute an Utility: Public Works interlocal cooperative agreement entitled "Public Works Trust Fund Trust Fund Loan, Central construction loan agreement" for replacement of the sanitary sewer mains Renton Sewer within the Central Renton sub-basin. MOVED BY KEOLKER- Replacement WHEELER, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution #2981 A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor and city clerk to execute an Utility: Public Works interlocal cooperative agreement entitled "Public Works Trust Fund Trust Fund Loan, East construction loan agreement" for installation of the East Renton sanitary Renton Sewer Interceptor sewer interceptor. MOVED BY SCHLITZER, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution #2982 A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor and city clerk to execute an Utility: Water Main interlocal cooperative agreement entitled "Washington State Department of Crossings SR-169, Transportation utility construction agreement" for the installation of two WSDOT Interlocal water main crossings on SR-169. MOVED BY SCHLITZER, SECONDED Agreement BY NELSON, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution #2983 A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor and city clerk to execute an Utility: Sewer Stub interlocal cooperative agreement entitled "Washington State Department of Installation SR-169, Transportation utility construction agreement" for the installation of WSDOT Interlocal sanitary sewer stubs on SR-169. MOVED BY SCHLITZER, SECONDED . Agreement BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution #2984 A resolution was read approving final plat for Summerwind Division No. Plat: Final, Summerwind 6 located at 5020 NE 20th Street (File No. FP-92-128). MOVED BY Division 6, 5020 NE 20, SCHLITZER, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL FP-92-128 ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS Council President Edwards requested Council consideration of establishing Finance: Budget Process an ad-hoc committee made up of representatives from the Transportation, Utilities, and Planning and Development Committees to review the entire Planning/Building/Public Works Department 1994 budget. • • May 24. 1993 Renton City Council Minutes Pane 245 Finance Committee Finance Committee Chair Mathews presented a report recommending Finance: Vouchers approval of Claims Vouchers #100930 - 101413; two wire transfers in the total amount of $1,467,018.66; approval of Payroll Vouchers # 117490 - 117845; and three direct deposits in the total amount of $984,620.76. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY TANNER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Utilities Committee Referred 5/17/93 - Utilities Committee Chairman Schlitzer presented a Utility: Public Works report concurring with the staff recommendation that the Mayor and city Trust Fund Loan, Central clerk be authorized to execute the agreements for the Public Works Trust Renton Sewer Fund Loan in the amount of $643,460 for the construction of the Central Replacement Renton sewer replacement project. The Committee further recommended that the resolution regarding this matter be presented for reading and adoption. MOVED BY SCHLITZER, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. (See later resolution.) Utility: Public Works Referred 5/17/93 - Utilities Committee Chairman Schlitzer presented a Trust Fund Loan, East report concurring with the staff recommendation that the Mayor and city Renton Sewer clerk be authorized to execute the agreements for the Public Works Trust Replacement Fund Loan in the amount of $2,542,704 for the construction of the East Renton interceptor project. The Committee further recommended that the resolution regarding this matter be presented for reading and adoption. MOVED BY SCHLITZER, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. (See later resolution.) Utility: Collector Line Referred 4/26/93 - Utilities Committee Chairman Schlitzer presented a Assessment, West report regarding the request for reduction of special assessment district Kennydale SAD, Francis, charge from Vernon Francis, 2624 Jones Avenue NE. The Committee 2624 Jones Ave NE concurred in the staff recommendation that Council approve a payment of one-half the assessment and associated interest (equating to a 10,749 square foot lot) for the property with the condition that the property owner sign a covenant to be recorded against the property requiring that the remainder of the assessment and interest, plus any additional interest accrued, be paid when the parcel is either subdivided or developed to a higher density. MOVED BY SCHLITZER, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. CAG: 93-032, Virginia Referred 5/17/93 - Utilities Committee Chairman Schlitzer presented a Seitz Construction, report concurring in the staff recommendation that the low bid for the Highlands Sewer Highlands sewer replacement project be accepted, and the contract be Replacement awarded to Virginia L. Seitz Construction Co. Inc. in the amount of $611,857.00. The engineer's estimate for the project was $607,943. The Committee recommended that the Mayor and city clerk be authorized to execute the contract documents. The Committee further recommended concurrence in staff recommendation that as part of the mid-year budget adjustments, funds be re-allocated as detailed below: AppRovED UTILITIES COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT May 24, 1993 EAST RENTON INTERCEPTOR - PUBLIC WORKS TRUST FUND CONSTRUCTION LOAN AGREEMENT (Referred: May 17, 1993) The Utilities Committee recommends concurrence in the staff recommendation that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute the agreements for the•Public Works Trust Fund Loan in the amount of $2,542,704 for the construction of the East Renton Interceptor Project. . The Committee further recommends that the Resolution regarding this matter be presented for reading and adoption. / //air Timothy J. SA, itz: , Chair 4rer � I � ,`2%. — Richard Stredicke, Vice Chair Kathy Kep er-Wheeler, Member C:DOCS:93-488:DMC:ps CC: Gregg Zimmerman . David Christensen . Mav 17, 1993 Renton City Council Minutes Page 223 CAG: 93-032, Virginia City Clerk reported bid opening on 5/3/93 for the Highlands sewer Seitz Construction, replacement construction contract (CAG-93-032); 12 bids; engineer's Highlands Sewer estimate $607,943.34; and submitted Wastewater Utility Division Replacement recommendation to award contract to Virginia L. Seitz Construction Company, in the amount of $611,856.93. Refer to Utilities Committee. Release of Easement: City Clerk submitted Loren Laskow request for release of sanitary sewer Sewer, Laskow, 15 S easement, Renton Village, 15 South Grady Way, RE-93-002. Refer to Grady Way, RE-93-002 Utilities Committee and Board of Public Works. Finance: Consultant City Clerk requested review of consultant contract approval procedure. Contract Approval Refer to Finance Committee. Procedure Court Case: Glacier Park Court Case (CRT-93-003) filed by Glacier Park Company and Burlington and Burlington Northern, Northern Railroad Properties, Inc. v. City of Renton and Modern CRT-93-003 .Manufacturing, Inc., in an undetermined amount for complaint of unjust enrichment regarding local improvement district assessments. Refer to City Attorney. Plat: Final, Swan Meadow Hearing Examiner recommended approval with conditions of the Swan Division II, Blaine Ave Meadow Division II final plat (FP-93-017), 2.18 acre, nine-lot NE and 13th Pl, FP-93- development located at Blaine Avenue NE and 13th Place. Council 017 concur. (See later resolution.) CAG: 85-089, John Parks Department requested approval of an addendum to CAG-85-089 Steidel, Golf Course with John Steidel in the amount of $5,700, to add #18 tee, green, and Improvements fairway; prepare 20-scale green and bunker drawings; and prepare drainage control plan. Refer to Community Services Committee. Police: Mercer Island Police Department requested approval of an interlocal agreement with Interlocal Agreement for Mercer Island for 1993 marine patrol services in an amount of $20,700. Marine Patrol Services Refer to Public Safety Committee. Utility: Public Works Wastewater Utility Division requested approval of a Public Works Trust Trust Fund Loan, Central Fund loan in the amount of $643,460 with 30% City matching funds for Renton Sewer the Central Renton Sanitary Sewer Replacement project. Refer to Replacement Utilities Committee. Utility: Public Works Wastewater Utility Division requested approval of a Public Works Trust Trust Fund Loan, East Fund loan in the amount of $2,542,704 with 20% City matching funds for Renton Sewer the East Renton Sanitary Sewer Interceptor project. Refer to Utilities Replacement Committee. 7 MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE Correspondence was received from Beverly Franklin, 537 Williams Citizen Comment: Avenue N., Renton 98055, requesting a multi-family buffer of four- Franklin, plexes in the area located north of Bronson and south of N. 2nd Street, Comprehensive Plan, between Factory Avenue N. and Garden Avenue N. Central/West Hill Citizen Comment: Correspondence was received from Marjorie J. Richter, 300 Meadow Richter, Comprehensive Avenue N., Renton 98055, requesting preservation of the North Renton Plan, Central/West Hill residential area utilizing appropriate buffering between the residential and commercial areas. CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Al #: (;7 J Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works For Agenda of: Dept/Div/Board.. Wastewater Utility May 17, 1993 Staff Contact Dave Christensen (X-6212) Agenda Status Consent X Subject: Public Hearing... East Renton Sanitary Sewer Interceptor Correspondence.. Public Works Trust Fund Construction Ordinance Loan Agreement Resolution Old Business Exhibits: New Business Draft Resolution Study Sessions.... Public Works Trust Fund Loan Agreement Information Recommended Action: Approvals: Refer to Utilities Committee of May 19, 1993 Legal Dept X Finance Dept Other Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... $3,137,916 Transfer/Amendment Amount Budgeted $595,21 2 Revenue Generated $2,542,704 (421/400/18.596.35.65.45000) Summary of Action: The Planning/Building/Public Works. Department applied for and received a Public Works Trust Fund loan for the East Renton Sanitary Sewer Interceptor project. The state sent the City the loan agreements to execute and return. The loan is for up to $2,542,704 with a City match of 20%. Staff Recommendation: The Planning/Building/Public Works Department staff recommends that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute the agreements for the Public Works Trust Fund Loan. C:DOCS:93-441:DMC:ps CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AN INTERLOCAL COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT ENTITLED "PUBLIC WORKS TRUST FUND CONSTRUCTION LOAN AGREEMENT" FOR INSTALLATION OF THE EAST RENTON SANITARY SEWER INTERCEPTOR WHEREAS, the City of Renton has declared a moratorium on future connections within the Heather Downs , Maplewood, and South Highlands Subbasins; and WHEREAS the City of Renton intends to install the East Renton Sanitary Sewer Interceptor to resolve the moratorium; and WHEREAS, the Public Works Trust Fund has agreed to make a construction loan to the City of Renton; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to document that loan by means of an agreement entitled "Public Works Trust Fund Construction Loan Agreement" ; and WHEREAS, it is in the interest of the citizens of the City of Renton to enter into said loan agreement; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS : SECTION I . The above recitals are found to be true and correct in all respects . SECTION II . The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to sign the agreement entitled "public Works Trust Fund Construction Loan Agreement Number PW-5-93-280-041 . " PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 1993 . Marilyn J. Petersen, City Clerk 1 _LESOLUTION NO. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 1993 . Earl Clymer, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RES . 286 : 5/11/93 : as . • 2 • PUBLIC WORKS TRUST FUND CONSTRUCTION LOAN AGREEMENT ' • NUMBER PW-5-93-280-041 City of Renton PART I: ENTIRE AGREEMENT This agreement,and incorporated.attachments, contains all terms and conditions agreed to by the DEPARTMENT and the LOCAL GOVERNMENT. This contract consists of nine pages and two attachments. An attachment to this agreement,ATTACHMENT I: SCOPE OF WORK, consists of a description of local project activities, certification of the project's useful life, and identification of estimated project costs and fund sources and is, by this reference,incorporated into this agreement as though set forth fully herein. In addition, ATTACHMENT II: ATTORNEY'S CERTIFICATION, is by this reference incorporated into this agreement. The DEPARTMENT and the LOCAL GOVERNMENT have executed this agreement as of the date and year last written below. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY LOCAL GOVERNMENT DEVELOPMENT ' Name Name Title Title Date Date Approved as to Form by Attorney General Taxpayer Identification Number 1 /410 • - nt •' . ney General 14 1 26143 Date 1 Construction Loan Agreement . PART II: INTRODUCTION This loan agreement is made and entered into by and between the DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, a department of the state of Washington (referred to as the "DEPARTMENT')on behalf of the PUBLIC WORKS BOARD{referred to as the"BOARD"),and the City of Renton (referred to as the "LOCAL GOVERNMENT'). The DEPARTMENT has received an appropriation from the Washington State Legislature under the authority of Chapter 43.155 RCW to provide financial assistance to selected units of local government for the repair, replacement, reconstruction, rehabilitation, or improvement of bridges, roads, domestic water systems, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer systems. Acting under the authority of Chapter 43.155 RCW, the BOARD has selected the LOCAL GOVERNMENT to receive a Public Works Trust Fund loan for an approved public works project. PART III: PURPOSE The DEPARTMENT and the LOCAL GOVERNMENT have entered into this agreement to undertake a local public works project which furthers the goals and objectives of the Washington State Public Works Trust Fund Program. The project will be undertaken by the LOCAL GOVERNMENT and will include the activities described in ATTACHMENT I: SCOPE OF WORK, as well as in the Public Works Trust.Fund Application submitted to the BOARD by the LOCAL GOVERNMENT and upon which this agreement is based. The assisted project. must be undertaken in accordance with PART IV: TERMS AND CONDITIONS,and all applicable state and local laws and ordinances,which by this reference are incorporated into this agreement as though set forth fully herein. • • PART IV: TERMS AND CONDITIONS The parties to this agreement agree as follows: 4.01 Rate and Term of Loan The DEPARTMENT, using funds appropriated from the Public Works Assistance Account, shall loan the LOCAL GOVERNMENT a sum not to exceed$2,542,704. The interest rate shall be two percent (2%) per annum on the outstanding principal balance. The term of the loan shall not exceed 20 years,with the final payment due July 1, 2013. 4.02 Local Project Share • The LOCAL GOVERNMENT pledges an amount of locally-generated revenue not less than twenty percent (20%) of the total eligible portion of the project cost not funded by federal or state grants as identified in ATTACHMENT I: SCOPE OF WORK,to be verified at the time of project close-out. Any change in the percentage of locally-generated funds may require an adjustment in the loan amount or interest rate charged, or both. In such event, the LOCAL GOVERNMENT agrees to execute an amendment to this agreement adjusting the loan amount or interest rate,as appropriate. 2. Construction Loan Agreement • • Local project share must consist of expenditures eligible under WAC 399-30-030(3)and be related only to project activities described in ATTACHMENT I: SCOPE OF WORK. These expenditures may be made.up to twelve (12) months prior to the execution of the loan agreement and verified at the time of project close-out. PUBLIC WORKS TRUST FUND MONIES MAY NOT BE USED TO REIMBURSE THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT FOR ANY COSTS INCURRED PRIOR TO EXECUTION OF THIS LOAN . AGREEMENT. 4.03 Disbursement of Loan Proceeds The DEPARTMENT shall issue warrants to the LOCAL GOVERNMENT for payment of allowable expenses incurred by the LOCAL GOVERNMENT while undertaking and administering approved project activities in accordance.with ATTACHMENT I: SCOPE OF WORK. Inno event shall the total Public Works Trust Fund loan exceed eighty percent(80%)of the eligible actual project costs. The disbursement of loan proceeds shall be initiated by the LOCAL GOVERNMENT on a Washington State Invoice Voucher form-provided by the DEPARTMENT. The loan funds will be disbursed to the LOCAL GOVERNMENT as follows: Within thirty (30) days of the formal execution of this agreement, a sumnot to exceed fifteen percent (15%) of the approved Public Works Trust Fund loan shall be disbursed by the DEPARTMENT to the LOCAL GOVERNMENT. Within thirty(30) days of the execution of a Notice to Proceed which follows the formal award of a construction contract, a sum not to exceed seventy-five percent (75%) of the approved Public Works Trust Fund loan shall be disbursed by the DEPARTMENT to the LOCAL GOVERNMENT, except in the case of engineering services contracts. If the approved project described in ATTACHMENT l: SCOPE OF WORK is solely for the completion of engineering studies,a sum not to exceed seventy-five percent (75%) of the. approved Public Works Trust Fund loan shall be disbursed by the DEPARTMENT to the LOCALGOVERNMENT within thirty (30) days of the execution of a Notice to Proceed following the formal award of a contract for engineering services. At the time of project completion,a Close-out Report, (refer to Section 4.19 for Close-out Report), shall be submitted to the DEPARTMENT by the LOCAL GOVERNMENT certifying total actual project costs. The Close-out Report shall include copies of the approved closure reports from the Department of Revenue and the Department of Labor&Industries. The final Public Works Trust Fund loan disbursement shall not bring the total loan in'excess of eighty percent(80%) of the eligible project costs or the total of$2,542,704,whichever is less, nor shall this disbursement occur prior to the completion of all project activities and clearance of all Close-out documents from the Department ofRevenue and the Department of Labor& Industries. The Close-out Report shall serve as a contract AMENDMENT for determining the final loan amount, interest rate, and local share. In the event that the final costs identified in the Close-out Report indicate that the LOCAL GOVERNMENT has received Public Works Trust Fund monies in excess of eighty percent (80%) of eligible costs, all funds in excess of eighty percent (80%) shall be repaid to the DEPARTMENT within thirty (30) days of submission of the Close-out Report. 3 Construction Loan Agreement 4.04 Interest Earned on Public Works Trust Fund Monies All interest earned on funds disbursed by the DEPARTMENT and held by the LOCAL GOVERNMENT shall accrue to the benefit of the LOCAL GOVERNMENT and be applied to the eligible costs of the approved project. Benefits shall accrue in oneof two ways: 1. Reduce the amount of the Public Works Trust Fund loan. 2. Pay part of the eligible project costs that are in excess of ATTACHMENT I: SCOPE OF WORK estimates. (Overrun of project costs.) The LOCAL GOVERNMENT shall establish procedures to ensure that all monies received from the Public Works Trust Fund loan can be readily identified and accounted for at any time during the life of this loan agreement. Such procedures shall consist of the establishment of a separate fund, account, sub-account or any other method meeting generally accepted accounting principles. 4.05 Time of Performance The LOCAL GOVERNMENT shall begin the activities identified within ATTACHMENT I: SCOPE OF WORK no later than October 1, 1993 and reach project completion no later than thirty (30) months after the date of agreement execution. Failure to perform within the time frame described in the preceding paragraph may constitute • default of this agreement and require the immediate repayment of any loan funds disbursed. In the event of extenuating circumstances, the LOCAL GOVERNMENT may request, in writing, that the BOARD extend the deadline for project completion. The BOARD may, by a two-thirds vote,extend the deadline. • The term of this agreement shall be for the entire term of the loan, irrespective of actual project completion, unless terminated sooner as provided herein. 4.06 Repayment The first loan repayment under this agreement is due July 1, 1994 and subsequent installments are due on July 1 of each year during the term of the loan: The first repayment under this agreement shall consist of interest only at the rate of two percent (2%) per annum, calculated on a 360-day year of twelve 30-day months, applied to funds received from the DEPARTMENT. Interest will begin to accrue from the date the DEPARTMENT issues each warrant to the LOCAL GOVERNMENT.Subsequent repayments shall consist of 1/19 of the principal plus interest on the unpaid balance of the loan. The final payment shall be an amount sufficient to bring the loan balance to zero. The LOCAL GOVERNMENT has the right to repay the unpaid balance of the loan in full at any time, and the right to repay at a faster rate than is provided in this agreement, provided that any such payment must equal or exceed the amount normally due on an annual basis. 4 Construction Loan Agreement The LOCAL GOVERNMENT will repay the loan in accordance with .the preceding conditions through the use of a check,money order,or equivalent means made payable to the DEPARTMENT and sent to: Department of Community Development Administrative Services Division/Fiscal Unit 906 Columbia Street S.W. P.O. Box 48319 Olympia,Washington 98504-8319 .. 4.07 Repayment Account The LOCAL GOVERNMENT shall repay the loan solely from utility revenues, general obligation revenues, or a combination thereof. The name of the fund, account, or sub-account shall be • 4.08 Default in Repayment Loan repayments shall be made to the DEPARTMENT.in accordance with Section 4.06 of this agreement. A payment not received within thirty (30) days of the due -date shall be. declared delinquent. Delinquent payments shall be assessed a penalty of twelve percent (12%)interest per annum calculated on a 360-day year. V Upon default,in the payment of any annual installment,the DEPARTMENT may declare the entire remaining balance of the loan,togetherwith interest accrued,immediately due and payable. Failure. to exercise its option with respect to any such repayment in default shall not constitute a waiver by the DEPARTMENT to exercise such option for any sUcceeding installment payment which may then be in default The LOCAL GOVERNMENT shall pay the costs and reasonable legal fees incurred by the DEPARTMENTin any action undertaken to enforce its rights under this section. 4.09 General Obligation This loan is a general obligation of the LOCAL:GOVERNMENT, except in, the case of utility systems, in which case, Section 4.10 shall prevail. 4.10 Utility System Repayment and Debt Parity . . V This section is for the use of LOCAL GOVERNMENTS desiring to specify that debt repayment is not a general obligation of the LOCAL GOVERNMENT. This section may be used only if the entire project is a domestic water,sanitary sewer or storm sewer utility project. LOCAL GOVERNMENTS performing,a storm sewer project that have not created a storm sewer utility or storm water utility may not use this section. Projects providing for a mixture of bridge,road,domestic water,sanitary sewer, and storm seweractivities may not utilize this section. In accordance with Section 4.06 of this agreement,the LOCAL GOVERNMENT shall be obligated to make all such repayments only from the net revenue of the LOCAL GOVERNMENT'S utility after the payment of the principal of and interest on any outstanding utility revenue bonds or notes at any time outstanding which constitute a 5 Construction Loan Agreement lien or charge on that net revenue. As used here, "net revenue" means gross revenue minus expenses of maintenance and operation. This loan agreement is not a general obligation of the LOCAL GOVERNMENT. Nothing in this section shall absolve the LOCAL GOVERNMENT of its obligation to make loan repayments when due, and to adjust rates,fees,or surcharges,if necessary,to meet its obligations under this agreement. 4.11 Recordkeeping and Access to Records The LOCAL GOVERNMENT agrees to keep such records.as the DEPARTMENT may require. Such records will include information pertinent to work undertaken aspart of the project, including demonstration of compliance with the terms and provisions of this agreement and all applicable state and local laws and ordinances. The LOCAL GOVERNMENT agrees to retain these records for a period of three years from the date of project completion. The DEPARTMENT and duly authorized officials of the state shall have full access and the right to examine, excerpt, or transcribe any pertinent documents, papers, records, and books of the LOCAL GOVERNMENT and of persons, firms, or organizations with which the LOCAL GOVERNMENT may contract, involving transactions related to this project and this agreement. 4.12 Reports The LOCAL GOVERNMENT, at such times and on such forms as the DEPARTMENT or the BOARD may require,shall furnish the DEPARTMENT with such periodic reports as it may request pertaining to the activities undertaken pursuant to this agreement including, but not limited to, quarterly progress reports,the Close-Out Report,and any other matters covered by this agreement. Failure to file periodic reports as requested may result in termination of this agreement as per Section 4.16. 4.13 Indemnification The LOCAL GOVERNMENT will defend, protect, indemnify, save, and hold harmless the DEPARTMENT, the BOARD, and the state of Washington from and against any and all claims, costs, damages, expenses, or liability for any or all injuries to persons or tangible property, arising from the acts or omissions of the LOCAL GOVERNMENT or any of its contractors or subcontractors, or any employees or agents of either in the performance of this agreement, however caused. In the case of negligence of both the DEPARTMENT and the LOCAL GOVERNMENT,any damages allowed shall be levied in proportion to the percentage of negligence attributable to each party. 4.14 Amendments. Modifications. and Waivers Except for an increase in the amount of the loan governed by this agreement, the LOCAL GOVERNMENT may request an amendment of this agreement for the purpose of modifying the SCOPE OF WORK or forextending the time of performance as provided for in Section 4.05. No modification or amendment resulting in an extension of time shall take effect until a request in writing has been received and approved by the Board in accordance with Section 4.05. No 6 Construction Loan Agreement amendment ormodification shall take effect until approved in writing by both the DEPARTMENT and the LOCAL GOVERNMENT and attached hereto. No conditions or provisions of this agreement may be waived unless approved by the DEPARTMENT in writing. 4.15 Disputes Except as otherwise provided in this agreement,any dispute concerning a question of fact arising under this agreement that is not disposed of by this agreement shall be decided by a panel consisting of a representative of the DEPARTMENT, a representative of the LOCAL GOVERNMENT,and a representative of the BOARD. The panel shall reduce its decision to writing and furnish a copy to all parties to the agreement. The decision of the panel shall be final and conclusive. This clause does not preclude the consideration of questions of law in connection with decisions provided for in the preceding paragraph provided that nothing in this agreement shall be construed as making final the decisions of any administrative official, representative, or boardon a question of law. 4.16 Termination for Cause If the LOCAL GOVERNMENT fails to comply with the terms of this agreement, or fails to use the loan proceeds only for those activities identified in ATTACHMENT I: SCOPE OF WORK, the DEPARTMENT may terminate the agreement in whole or in part at any time. The DEPARTMENT shall promptly notify the LOCAL GOVERNMENT in writing of its determination to terminate, the reason for such termination,and'the effective date of the termination. Upon termination of the loan agreement,the DEPARTMENT shall declare the entire remaining balance of the loan,together with any interest accrued, immediately due and payable. 4.17 Governing Law and Venue This agreement shall be construed and enforced in accordance with,, and the validity and performance hereof shall be governed by, the laws of the state of Washington. Venue of any suit between the parties arising out of this agreement shall be the Superior Court of Thurston County, Washington. The prevailing party is entitled to recover costs in accordance with Washington State Law(Chapter 4.84'RCW). 4.18 Severability If any provision under this agreement or its application to any person or circumstances is held invalid by any court of rightful jurisdiction, this invalidity does not affect other provisions of the agreement which can be given effect without the invalid provision. 4.19 Project Completion The DEPARTMENTwiII require and notify the LOCAL GOVERNMENT to initiatea Close-out Report when the activities identified in ATTACHMENT I: SCOPE OF WORK are completed. In the report, the LOCAL GOVERNMENT will provide the following information to the DEPARTMENT: 7 Construction Loan Agreement 1. A description of the actual work performed, in addition to a certified statement of the actual dollar amounts spent, from all fund sources, in completing the project as described. 2. Certification that all costs associated with the project have been incurred. Costs are incurred when goods and services are received and/or contract work is performed. 3. Copies of- the approved closure reports from the Department of Revenue and the Department of Labor & Industries, certifying that all sales taxes have been paid and appropriate industrial insurance and prevailing wages have been paid. 4.20 Project Close-out In accordance with Section 4.03 of this agreement, the LOCAL GOVERNMENT will submit, together with the Close-out Report, a request for a sum not to exceed the final ten percent (10%) of the loan amount. This disbursement shall not occur prior to the completion of all project activities and clearance of all Close-out documents from the Department of Revenue and the Department of Labor&Industries. The LOCAL GOVERNMENT shall be responsible to ensure compliance with the Department of Revenue and the Department of Labor & Industries requirements by their contractor(s). 4.21 Audit Audits of the LOCAL GOVERNMENT'S project activities may be conducted by the Municipal Division of the State Auditor's Office in accordance with state law and any guidelines the DEPARTMENT may prescribe. Payment for the audit, shall be made by the LOCAL GOVERNMENT. 4.22 Project Signs If the LOCAL GOVERNMENT displays, during the period covered by this agreement, signs or markers identifying those agencies participating financially in the approved project, the sign or marker must identify the Washington State Public Works Trust Fund as a participant in the project. 4.23 Utilization of Minority and Women Business Enterprises (MWBE) The LOCAL GOVERNMENT is encouraged to utilize business firms that are certified as minority- owned and/or women-owned in carrying out the purposes of this loan agreement. LOCAL GOVERNMENTS may set their own utilization standards, based upon local conditions, or may utilize the state of Washington MWBE goals, as identified in WAC 326-30-03904. 4.24 Nondiscrimination Provision There shall not be discrimination against any employee who is paid by the funds indicated in the contract or against any applicant for such employment because of race, color,sex, age, or national origin. This provision shall include, but not be limited to, the following: employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment, advertising, lay-off or termination, rates or pay or other forms of compensation and selection for training. This section shall be construed to pertain to the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (Public Law 101-336), which provides comprehensive civil rights 8 Construction Loan Agreement protection in the areas of employment,public accommodation,state and local government services, and telecommunications to individuals with disabilities. PART V: SPECIAL ASSURANCES The LOCAL GOVERNMENT assures compliance with all applicable state and local laws, requirements,and ordinances as they pertain to the design, implementation,and administration of the approved project. Of particular importance are the following: 5.01 RCW 43.155.060 The LOCAL GOVERNMENT shall comply with the provisions of RCW 43.155.060 regarding competitive bidding requirements for projects assisted in whole or in part with money from the Public Works Trust Fund program. 5.02 WAC 399-30-030(3) The LOCAL GOVERNMENT assures compliance with WAC 399-30-030(3)which identifies eligible costs for projects assisted with Public Works Trust Fund loans. • 9 Construction Loan Agreement PUBLIC WORKS TRUST FUND ATTACHMENT 1: SCOPE OF WORK PW-5-93-280-041 City of Renton • (Jurisdiction) East Renton Interceptor (Project Title) 1. Provide a clear description of the project to be financed in part by a Public Works Trust Fund loan. (attach an additional sheet if necessary): Please see attached sheet. 2. The term for this loan will be based on an engineer's certification of the expected useful life of the improvements, as stated below, or 20 years, whichever is less. If the local government prefers the term of its loan to be less than either 20 years or the useful life of the improvements, the preferred loan term should be indicated: 20 years. 3. I, Gregg Zimmerman , licensed engineer, certify that the average expected useful life for the improvements described above is 50 years. • Signed: )j ile A���'i'r-�� 7 �y // Date: March 8. 1993 Telephone: (206) 277-6211 • PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The East Renton.Interceptor, West Maplewood Alternative, involves construction of approximately 9,865feet of 8, 12, 15, and 18 inch pipe from the East Renton area (NE 4th and Duvall Avenue NE) westerly along NE 4th Street southerly to the Maple Valley Highway. (See attached schematic drawing). The 8-inch and 12-inch pipe will primarily be utilized to relocate flows from portions of the existing facilities currently over capacity to the new interceptor. The 15-inch and 18-inch pipe will be utilized for the interceptor portion. Sizing of the interceptor is currently based on predesign information, the actual sizing of the facility will be based upon information ' gathered during the final design. The East Renton Interceptor will be gravity driven and will eliminate the need for two costly lift stations - the Union 600 and Honeydew. The interceptor line will range in depths of 5 to 29 feet. Additional items of work include installation of manholes per City of Renton and Washington State Department of Ecology guidelines, street restoration and landscaping as required. C:DOCS:93-252:DMC:ps 1 SCOPE OF WORK Page 2 PW-5-93-280-041 4. Estimated Project Costs: Repair or Expansion Total Replacement or Growth Preliminary Engineer Report $ -0- $ $ -0- Design Engineering 240,000 240,000 Land/R-O-W Acquisition 100,000 100,000 Sales or Use Taxes 202,704 202,704 • Other Fees -0- -0- Construction Inspection 200,000 .200,000 Start-up Costs -0- -0- Financing Costs 140,000 - 140,000 Retainage 115,500 115,500 Construction 2,194,500 162,000 2,356,500 TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST $ 3,192,704 162,000 3,354,704 5. Anticipated Fund Sources: A. Federal Grants $ -0- State Grants • $ -o- ®._ SCOPE OF WORK Page 3 PW-5-93-280-041 B. Locally Generated Revenue General Funds $ -0- , Capital Reserves -0- Other- Fund. -0- Rates 812.000 Assessments (LID, RID, ULID) -0- Special Levies -0- _ Federal Loan(s) from: (identify all) • -0- -0- State Loan(s) from: (identify all) -0- • -0- Other: (identify source) -0- TOTAL LOCAL REVENUE: $ 812.000 C. Public Works Trust Fund Loan 2,542,704 • /-• Public Works Mrust Fund `'(//./if--"/L =CEMENT ATICIRNEY'S CERTIFICATICti - , hereby certify __ I am an attorney at law admitted to practice in the State of islashingtion and the duly appointed attorney of the _ — . (the LOCAL GOVERNMENT) ; and — • I have reviewed Loan Agreement Prig-5--89-962-CEP-0006 to be eocecuted between • - -• - •the LOCAL GOVERNMENT and the Department of Cammunity Development (the DEPARTMENT) ; arid I have also examined any and all documents and records which are pertinent to the loan agreement, including. the applicatiai requesting this financial assistance. Based on the foregoing, it is my opinion that: 1. The IDCM GOVERRIENT is a public Imdy, properly constituted and operating under the laws of the State of Washington, empowered to receive and mccerri federal, state, and local funds, to contract with • the State of Washington, and to reoeive and mgoend the funds involved to accomplish the objectives set forth in their application. 2. The LOCAL GOVERMENT is empowered to accept the Public Works Trust 11.1nd financial assistance and to provide for repayment of the loan as set • forth in the loan agreement. 3. Mere is currently rm litigation in (mister= seeking to enjoin the • caamencement ar completion of the above-described public farsil 1 ties project or to enjoin the LOCAL cxygERNmEn frcm repaying the Public Works Trust Fund loan extended by the rEpARTmENT with respect to such project. TheLCL GOVERNMENT is not a party to litigation which will materially affect its ability to repay such loan on the terms contained in the loan agreement. 4. Assumption of this obligation would not exceed statutory and administrative rule debt limitations applicable to the IL GOVERNMENT. - Signature of Attorney Date • • Address Qi(1:,)/1,41a.?"/11;•;-)1-7 Public Watics Trust2. - ATIMCIIMENT ATUCEMY'S CEPTIFICMICti - - I, , hereby certify __ _ I art an attorney at law admitted to practice in the State of 'Washington and the duly appointed attorney of the • (the LOCAL GOVERNMENT) ; and • I have reviewed Loan Agreement 144--5-89-962-CIP-0006 to be executed between - - the =CAL GO?ET and the Department of Cct=unity Development (the • • DEPARTMENT) ; and I have also examined any and all doom:vents and records which are pertinerxt to the loan agreement, irrauding the application regiesting this financial assistance. • Based an the foregoing, it is my opinion that: 1.. The IDCZL GOVERNMENT is a public b:xly, properly constituted and operating Linder the laws of the State of Washington, eqxwered to receive and expend federal, state, and local funds, to contract with the State of Washington, and to receive and expend the funds involved to accorplish the objectives set forth in their applicatiori. 2. The LOOM GOVERMENT is empowered to accept the Public Works Trust Rind financial assistanoe•arrl to provide for repayment of the loan as set forth in the loan agreement. • 3.. Mere is currently no litigation in existence seeking to enjoin the casmerx:ement or ampletion Of the above-described public far-Ilities project or to enjoin the =CAL GOVERMENT from repaying the Public Works Trust Rind loan extended by the rEPAT with respect to such project. ID= GOVERMENT is not a party to litigation whith will materially affect its ability to repay such loan on the terms contained in the loan agreement. 4. Assumption of this obligation would not exceed statutomy arrl administrative rule debt•limitations applicable to the Maki, GOVERNMENT. Signature of Attorney rate - . • Address April 26, 1993 Lenton City Council Minutes Page 185 Rainier, Inc., P. O. Box 977, Renton 98057 (property located at 3100 W. Valley Road); Mrs. C. A. Staley, P. O. Box 3407, Federal Way 98063 (property located at 108, 114, 118, & 122 SW 12th Street). General: William B. Bechtold, General Partner, Olympic Development Partnership, 1655 Anacortes Avenue NE, Suite 203, Renton 98059. MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY NELSON, REFER ALL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CORRESPONDENCE TO THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE. CARRIED. OLD BUSINESS Referred 4/12/93 - Utilities Committee Chairman Schlitzer presented a Utilities Committee report recommending concurrence in the Planning/Building/Public Works CAG: 91-002, RH2 Department's recommendation authorizing the Mayor and city clerk to Engineering, East execute Addendum No. 4, CAG-91-002 with RH2 Engineering, P.S. to Renton Interceptor perform final design services of the Council-selected West Maplewood alternative of the East Renton Interceptor project. The total cost of this addendum is $318,327, and is within the current authorized budget for this project. MOVED BY SCHLITZER, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. CAG: 91-063, Brown Referred 4/12/93 - Utilities Committee Chairman Schlitzer presented a and Caldwell, report recommending concurrence in the Planning/Building/Public Works Inflow/Infiltration Department's recommendation authorizing the Mayor and city clerk to Study execute Task Order No. 7, CAG-91-063 with Brown and Caldwell for Phase II of the Inflow and Infiltration study. MOVED BY SCHLITZER, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. CAG: 91-083, Soos Creek Referred 4/12/93 - Utilities Committee Chairman Schlitzer presented a Sewer Main Transfer of report recommending concurrence in staff recommendation that all parcels Jurisdiction, S 55th St with existing sewer service in the county and transferred to Renton by our agreement CAG-91-083 with Soos Creek be charged the resident rate to the extent that the parcels are developed. If these parcels develop further either by short plat or change of density, then they would have to • annex to the City or pay the non-resident rate. All parcels not currently served shall receive sewer service only through the procedures as required by the Renton City Code as adopted at that time. MOVED BY SCHLITZER, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Councilman Stredicke stated that he did not sign the Committee report because the area affected by the transfer of jurisdiction should have been required to annex prior to the transfer of services. It was clarified that this area is very small and did not meet the criteria for staff to pursue annexation. The services are transferred through the mutual agreement between the City of Renton and Soos Creek. Finance Committee Finance Committee Member Nelson presented a report recommending Finance: Vouchers approval of Claims Vouchers #99972 - 100484; two wire transfers in the total amount of $1,119,675.23; approval of Payroll Vouchers #116781 - 117134; and 335 direct deposits in the total amount of $975,263.30. MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY TANNER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. APPROVED UTILITIES COMMITTEE • .COMMITTEE REPORT April 26, 1993 ADDENDUM NO. 4.TO CAG-91-002 FOR RH2 ENGINEERING, P.S. ON THE EAST RENTON INTERCEPTOR PROJECT (Referred: .4/12/93) • The Utilities Committee recommends concurrence "of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department's recommendation that Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute Addendum No. 4 under CAG-91-002 with RH2 -Engineering, P.S. to perform final design services of the Council selected West Maplewood Alternative of the East Renton Interceptor project. The total cost of this Addendum is $318,327 and is within the current authorized budget for this project. • Timothy J. Schi z- , hair / • Richard Stredicke, Vice Chair /V4612.' 6() Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Member C:DOCS:93-402:DMC:ps CC: Gregg Zimmerman , Dave Christensen eoti ;. 4.to —21:4/ - th �� !�T,.g'.,_t..f.. x,77( • ' 'R,."fi • CITY;DL F':is <Q C;1-7.:j,.'EW VRenton City Council Renton Environmental Review Committee Renton Public Works Department • • Everett Wilcock 11830 164th Ave S.E. Renton , WA 98059 April 13, 1993 Dear Involved Party; Thank you for your memo of April 5 and the copies of the • Addendum to the East Renton Interceptor Project Environmental Impact Statement. The Addendum significantly increases the additional population that can be supported by the intercepter from those examined in the impact statement by effectively combining two of the alternatives making the maximum build out 10 to 12 thousand units rather than the maximum of 7 .5 thousand that was dealt with in the EIS. This significantly alters the traffic , surface water run off , and air pollution impacts of the proposal . Because of the inadequacy of the EIS in dealing- with the impacts created by this I wish to appeal the adequacy of the EIS. Please inform me of the procedures that you have established for appeals (Wac 197-11-902, 197-11-680 ) so that I may proceed in a timely and appropriate manor. Sincerely; Everett Wilcock - C! �. April 5, 1993 •Renton City Council Minutes111. Page 159 MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Planning: Senior Housing Community Services Chair Keolker-Wheeler stated that the Committee Project, 3151 NE 16th St, has reviewed senior housing project rental eligibility and that information R-91-020 is available for councilmembers at their request. Councilman Stredicke asked if the date has been set for the senior housing project opening. Councilwoman Keolker-Wheeler responded that the date of the grand opening will be set when Governor Lowry advises the City when he can attend. However, the facility will open for occupancy prior to the grand opening. Utility: East Renton ' Councilman Stredicke stated that he received an amendment to the EIS Interceptor for the East Renton Interceptor project. He expressed concern that the addendum map includes all of the East Renton drainage system. Gregg Zimmerman clarified that the West Maplewood route is the alignment that was approved by Council. He stated that the pipe was sized larger than the original West Maplewood alignment to accept flows from the East Renton area if a pump station is installed.LCouncilwoman Keolker-Wheeler clarified that the document reflects the alternative recommended by the Utilities Committee and adopted by Council: . ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS The following ordinance was presented for second and final reading: Ordinance #4396 An ordinance was read amending Section 10-10-4 of Chapter 10, Parking Police: Residential Regulation, of Title X (Traffic) of City Code, by rescinding subsection Parking Permit Fees I0-10-4.H.8 relating to the collection of an administrative fee for permit parking. MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY TANNER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS PRESENTED. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. MOTION CARRIED. The following resolution was presented for reading and adoption: Resolution #2960 A resolution was read adopting a recommendation for urban growth Planning: Urban Growth technical review areas adjacent to the City of Renton designated in the Areas countywide planning policies. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS Gregg Zimmerman requested Council direction on a letter recently King County: received from King County Councilman Larry Phillips concerning a Conservation District possible per parcel assessment for all residents within the King County Conservation District. Mr. Zimmerman noted that Renton joined the Conservation District about one year ago and stated the purpose of the District is to provide farm management plans, water quality and aquatic habitat resources for agricultural areas, and aquatic and surface water resources protection. He stated that the Conservation District revenue sources are going to be decreased and possibly cut out of State budget in 4IP 0 March 8. 1993 Renton City Council Minutes Pane 124 Resolution #2954 An ordinance was read authorizing the Mayor and city clerk to enter into Transportation: WSDOT an interlocal agreement with the Washington State Department of Interlocal Agreement, Transportation for the receipt and use of grant monies for a parking CTR Plan policy review and administration of the Commuter Trip Reduction ordinance. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY KEOLKER- WHEELER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution #2955 A resolution was read approving final plat (River Ridge Final Plat: Final, River Ridge, Plat/Lakeridge Development, Inc., located at South 7th Street and Jones S 7th St & Jones Ave S, Avenue South, File No. FP-92-179). MOVED BY STREDICKE, FP-92-179 SECONDED BY SCHLITZER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution #2956 A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor and city clerk to enter into Transportation: WSDOT an interlocal cooperative agreement with the Washington State Department Interlocal Agreement, of Transportation relating to the resurfacing and preservation project for Airport Way/Rainier Ave. Airport Way to Rainier Avenue South between Logan Avenue South and Resurfacing South Second Street. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution #2957 A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor and city clerk to enter into Transportation: WSDOT an interlocal cooperative agreement with the Washington State Department Interlocal Agreement, of Transportation relating to roadway reconstruction of Talbot Road Talbot Rd. S. Resurfacing South. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY SCHLITZER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS Councilman Stredicke asked the Administration to determine how soon Utility: East Renton the building moratorium in northeast Renton can be lifted now that a Interceptor sewer interceptor route has been selected. Comprehensive Plan: Councilman Stredicke requested that Planning staff provide a list of General zoning designations that will accommodate fraternal organizations, services clubs, and halls. Public Works: Mt. Olivet Councilman Stredicke asked if the City is monitoring the Mt. Olivet Landfill landfill gasses. It was clarified that methane testing is being done and is a condition of landfill closure, but Mt. Olivet is not yet closed. SCA: SeaTac Airport Councilwoman Mathews noted that there will be a meeting of the Runway Suburban Cities Association next week to take action on the third runway at SeaTac Airport. She asked for Council direction for those in attendance. Councilwoman Keolker-Wheeler expressed concern about directing a vote when all the alternatives have not been reviewed. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY SCHLITZER, COUNCIL AUTHORIZE THOSE COUNCILMEMBERS AND MAYOR IN ATTENDANCE TO CAST A MAJORITY VOTE FOR THE CITY OF RENTON AFTER THE PRESENTATION. CARRIED. March 8. 1993 Renton City Council Minutes Page 122 OLD BUSINESS Referred 3/1/93 - Transportation Committee Vice-Chair Schlitzer Transportation presented a report recommending that Council authorize the Mayor and Committee city clerk to execute the agreement between the City and Burlington Transportation: Northern Railroad for right-of-way easements at the intersection of Burlington Northern Park/Lake Washington Boulevard and construction of two railroad Railroad Crossings crossings and the petition to the Washington Utilities and Transportation Agreement Committee for approval to construct these crossings. MOVED BY SCHLITZER, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Transportation: WSDOT Referred 3/1/93 - Transportation Committee Vice-Chair Schlitzer, Interlocal Agreement, presented a report recommending that Council authorize the Mayor and Talbot Rd. S. Resurfacing the city clerk to execute the resolution, federal air project prospectus, and the Washington State Department of Transportation interlocal agreement for the Talbot Road South improvements project. The Committee further recommended that the resolution regarding this matter be presented for reading and adoption. MOVED BY SCHLITZER, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. (See later resolution.) Transportation: WSDOT Referred 3/1/93 - Transportation Committee Vice-Chair Schlitzer Interlocal Agreement, presented a report recommending that Council authorize the Mayor and Airport Way/Rainier Ave. city clerk to execute the resolution, federal-aid project prospectus, and Resurfacing Washington State Department of Transportation interlocal agreement for the Airport Way and Rainier Avenue South, from Logan to South Second, resurfacing and preservation project. The Committee further recommended that the resolution regarding this matter be presented for reading and adoption. MOVED BY SCHLITZER, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. (See later resolution.) Transportation: WSDOT Referred 3/1/93 - Transportation Committee Vice-Chair Schlitzer Interlocal Agreement, presented a report recommending that Council authorize the Mayor and CTR Plan city clerk to execute the interlocal agreement with Washington State Department of Transportation to receive $20,000 federal grant money with a local match of $3,122 for administration of the Commute Trip Reduction Plan. The Committee further recommended that the resolution regarding this matter be presented for reading and adoption. MOVED BY SCHLITZER, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. (See later resolution.) Utilities Committee Referred 12/7/92 - Utilities Committee Chair Schlitzer presented a report Utility: Ea .t Renin recommending concurrence with the Planning/Building/Public Works Interceptor Department recommendation to select the West Maplewood Alternative (as modified in the 3/1/93 memorandum to the Utilities Committee and Council) as the preferred sewer interceptor route. The Committee further recommended that Council direct staff to initiate the final design process for this alternative. MOVED BY SCHLITZER, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Councilwoman Keolker-Wheeler stated that if either of the two absent councilmembers wish to discuss this issue next week, she would be willing to make a motion to reconsider the matter. O o _Doo App RovED UTILITIES COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT March 8, 1993 EAST RENTON INTERCEPTOR - SELECTION OF PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE (Referred: December 7, 1992) The Utilities Committee recommends concurrence with Planning/Building/Public Works Department's recommendation to select the West Maplewood Alternative (as modified in the March 1, 1993 memorandum to the Utilities Committee and Council) as the preferred sewer interceptor route. The Committee further recommends that Council direct staff to initiate the final design process for this alternative. —a, /0 re /4/4/ imothy J. S. lit -r, Chair /11 Richard Stredicke, Vice Chair 46-ekki Kathy Kerylker-Wheeler, Member. C:DOCS:92=243:DMC:ps CC: Gregg Zimmerman David Christensen 410 March 8. 1993 Renton City Council Minutes Page 119 Citizen Comment Vaupel Versie Vaupel, P. O. Box 755, Renton 98057, expressed support of the - Special Permit, 1522 N. petition submitted by Marge Richter and stated that continuing to Brooks approve the special use permit for business use at 1522 North Brooks would be an injustice to area residents. Ms. Vaupel asked if a special use permit can continue under change of ownership and requested a definition of the uses, limitations, and expiration of a special use permit in a residential area. Citizen Comment Tibbott Dean Tibbott, 17003 NE 28th Place, Bellevue 98008, stated that the East - East Renton Interceptor Maplewood route for the interceptor project should be chosen because it is in alignment with the boundaries of the urban growth line and the geophysical boundary of the drainage basin, and would serve a larger area at a lesser hook-up cost. Ms. Tibbott asked Council to consider the benefits of cost effectiveness, versatility, and what better serves the immediate needs of the entire area before making a decision. Councilwoman Keolker-Wheeler gave Mr. Tibbott a copy of the memorandum from Lynn Guttmann, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator, presented at the Utilities Committee meeting to explain the selection of the West Maplewood route. Citizen Comment: Sarah McDonald, P. O. Box 1825, Renton 98057, submitted McDonald - correspondence requesting reimbursement from the City for delays Comprehensive Plan, SE incurred in rezone approval and sale of her property. She also requested Renton 24 units per acre zoning designation for her property located at 1600 Grant Avenue South. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, REFER THIS CORRESPONDENCE TO THE CITY ATTORNEY. CARRIED. Citizen Comment Webb - Sandy Webb, 430 Mill Avenue South, Renton 98055, stated that Mill Comprehensive Plan, SE Avenue should be designated multi-family because it provides a buffer Renton between the single-family residences and I-405, and the primary area use is currently multi-family not single family. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. Rezone: Senior City Clerk requested adoption of an ordinance to approve the rezone from Housing Project, 3151 R-1 and R-2 to R-3 and short plat for the Renton Senior Housing NE 16th St. (R-91- Project (File R-91-020), 13.42 acres located at 3151 NE 16th St., Renton. 020) Council concur. (See later action.) Appeal: Forrest Creste City Clerk submitted appeal of hearing examiner's decision filed on Rezone and Site 2/1/93 by Nancy Johnson and 3/2/93 by Loren Combs, representing Approval, Duvall Ave. Raymond LaBlanc, applicant, for the Forrest Creste rezone from G-1 to and NE 6th St. (R;SA- R-3 and site approval for 24 townhouse condominiums and 168 apartment 88-093) units (File R;SA-88-093), 11.93 acres located on the east side of Duvall Avenue, north of NE 6th Street. Refer to Planning and Development Committee. Court Case: Snow, CRT- Court Case in an undetermined amount filed by Judith A. Lonnquist, 93-002 P.S., attorney, 1500 Seattle Tower, 1218 Third Ave., Seattle 98101 on behalf of Michael Snow, former City employee, for wages and benefits allegedly withheld during term of employment. Refer to City Attorney. 41. March 8. 1993 Renton City Council Minutes Page 118 Citizen Comment: Miller Fred Miller, 375 Union Avenue SE, #184, Renton, requested that the B1 - Comprehensive Plan, zoning designation be retained for the Elks property, located at 1600 SE Renton Eagle Ridge Drive, Renton. Citizen Comment: Lila Campen, 4908 South Talbot Road, Renton, requested a zoning Campen - Comprehensive designation that will accommodate 24 units per acre for her property, and Plan, SE Renton asked for clarification of the total minimum number of acres necessary for this designation. Ms. Campen noted that she owns a 20-acre parcel on Talbot Road but only 10 can be developed. Councilwoman Mathews requested staff to clarify the number of acres required for the 24 units per acre zoning designation. Citizen Comment: Clapp Bill Clapp, 9010 NE 10th Street, Bellevue, spoke on behalf of Paula - Comprehensive Plan, Swanson, owner of property located at 5020 Talbot Road, Renton, and SE Renton expressed concern that the proposed SF4 mix zoning designation discriminates against the small landowner. Ms. Swanson owns six acres and requests 24 units per acre designation for her property. Citizen Comment: Todd Woosley, representing Talbot Road property owners and Burnstead Woosley - Comprehensive Corporation, 1215 - 120th Avenue NE, Suite 201, Bellevue 98005, stated Plan, SE Renton that if the City ordinance requiring a site plan review for any parcel over 20 acres is combined with stringent design standards, attractive multi- family developments would be insured and a master plan would not be required. Mr. Woosley referenced the comment made by Bud Tynes at the 2/22/93 meeting and clarified that Mr. Tynes requested a zoning designation of 24 units per acre for his property. Mr. Woosley asked if the selected interceptor alternative will serve the LCkt 70-acre parcel owned by Burnstead Corporation located on 128th and 156th. If it will not, he questioned City plans to service that area with k ,n*.exc,p� 0-C sewer in the future, noting that the soils will not percolate. Citizen Comment: Warren Diamond, 4914 Talbot Road South, Renton 98055, requested Diamond - multi-family, up to 24 units per acre, zoning designation for his property Comprehensive Plan, SE as presented in Alternate 1 which was recommended by the EIS Renton consultants. Citizen Comment: Richter Marjorie Richter, 300 Meadow Avenue North, Renton 98055, stated that - Special Permit at 1522 residents of the North Renton area are opposed to spot zoning and one- N. Brooks way arterial routes in their neighborhood. Ms. Richter submitted a petition with 51 signatures opposing the improper use of the present R2 zoning for property located at 1522 North Brooks and the proposed chemical abuse center or clinic at this site. Residents also urged that the special permit which allows the current use not be transferred to another owner or use. Citizen Comment: Roger Blaylock, 10717 NE 4th Street, Suite 9, Bellevue 98004, felt that Blaylock - because the City has a strong site plan ordinance in place, a master plan Comprehensive Plan, SE is not necessary. Any project in the City that is over four units goes Renton through an administrative process for site plan review, or to the hearing examiner. He also suggested that the hospital be designated as a higher density due to its size. CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: March 1, 1993 TO: Tim Schlitzer, Chair Members of Utilities Committee VIA: Mayor Earl Clymer FROM: L mann STAFF CONTACT: Dave C istensen SUBJECT: EAST RENTON INTERCEPTOR SELECTION OF A PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE ISSUE: In response to the sewer moratorium placed by Council per Resolution 2764 and further extended by Resolution 2879, staff has prepared a predesign report and Environmental Impact Statement addressing three action alternatives (East Maplewood, West Maplewood and South Highlands) as well as a no action alternative. The issue before the Utilities Committee, and ultimately the full Council, is the selection of an alternative, preferably with the direction for staff to proceed with a final design and the construction of a sewer interceptor in order to allow the current moratorium to be lifted. BACKGROUND: Since the time that the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) dated November 1992 was prepared, there have been presentations made to Council as follows: DATE BEFORE WHOM ACTION RECOMMENDATION 12/17/92 Utilities Committee Presentation to Hold public hearing. Committee 1/11/93 Council Public hearing. Referred to Utilities Committee. 2/04/93 Utilities Committee Response to public Additional information hearing requested. DISCUSSION: At the Utilities Committee meeting of February 4, 1993, the Committee requested that staff further investigate the following issues: • Ability to fund an improvement through the State Public Works Trust Fund Loan Program utilizing the West Maplewood Alternative. • Tim Schlitzer, Chair East Renton Intercept Page 2 • Status of McMahon site regarding obtaining easement rights, coordination of interceptor location in respect to potential site development. • Impact of road, if installed, through McMahon site from Maple Valley Highway to NE 4th Street. • Impact to environmentally sensitive areas for the West Maplewood Alternative through the McMahon site. The questions proved to be quite timely, for from the time of the Utilities Committee meeting until now, the property commonly referred to as the McMahon site, which was in probate, was sold to M. A. Segale, Inc. With the purchase of this property, combined with the advancement of the proposed zoning for this site, the feasibility of utilizing the West Maplewood Alternative has greatly increased. Given that acquiring easement rights through the site would most likely be reasonably obtained, we further evaluated the West Maplewood Alternative and slightly modified it to achieve the same primary objectives that the East Maplewood Alternative met. Those objectives include two primary items. The first objective was to ensure the interceptor would be able to facilitate the overall long range projected flows for the entire East Maplewood Subbasin which also coincides with the currently adopted urban growth boundary. With the interceptor having the capability to provide sewer service to the entire basin, it would, therefore, meet the second objective of enabling us to provide the added layer of aquifer protection to the basin. Because of proposed design modifications, the West Maplewood Alternative could now achieve these objectives. We have re-sized the interceptor to include the flow from the south half of the East Maplewood Subbasin. Because the majority of the south half of this basin is at an elevation below that of the proposed West Maplewood Interceptor, a sewage lift station would be required to provide flows to the interceptor. With these revisions, the West Maplewood Alternative meets the same objectives that the East Maplewood Alternative currently meets. In addition, if the West Maplewood Alternative is selected, it actually increases our flexibility in providing sewer service to the already existing development in the East Maplewood Subbasin. It accomplishes this by leaving the option open to install a downsized interceptor down the slope and through the golf course to the Metro Interceptor, or a lift station could be installed that would pump flows up to the West Maplewood Alternative's interceptor. This could prove very beneficial if it is determined that the existing and/or future septic tanks in the East Renton area are adversely impacting our aquifer. With the minor modification of upsizing the facility, and increasing the service basin, we submitted a revised application to the Public Works Trust Fund staff requesting that they evaluate the new application identifying the revised West Maplewood Alternative to determine if it would quality for funding. The City's staff was extremely pleased to get written confirmation from the State that the revised application would, in fact, qualify for funding for the Public Works Trust Fund Program for 1993. Therefore, the City has an equal option from a financing standpoint of selecting the East Maplewood or West Maplewood alternative. The questions regarding environmentally sensitive areas within the former McMahon site were addressed during the EIS and Predesign Report preparation. As part of this work, a wetland expert and RH2's geologist established a map of environmentally i lin acnlitzer, Chair East Renton Interco Page 3 sensitive areas ,(figure 2 FEIS and Figure 4 Predesign) that was used in analyzing and selecting the routes. In addition, once an alternative is selected, we will provide a more detailed level of analysis of environmentally sensitive areas through the use of various experts. The current route shown for the West Maplewood Alternative was selected in part to avoid significant adverse impacts to environmentally sensitive areas. The issues involved with the potential roadway have yet to be fully resolved. In conversation with the City's Transportation System Division staff, several unknowns must be determined prior to being able to define what type of transportation facility, if any, may link Maple Valley Highway to NE 4th Street. Those items include zoning for the former McMahon site and surrounding sites to determine densities, and thus, trip generations as well as to determine routing locations for transit. The impact to the construction of a sewer interceptor through this area is minimal. If the timing for the transportation decisions meets the timing of this interceptor project, we will fully coordinate efforts. If timing for the transportation element does not coincide with the interceptor project, then we will endeavor to minimize any potential impacts the sewer facility may have to any proposed transportation system. By increasing the potential service area of the West Maplewood Interceptor to include the south half of the East Maplewood Subbasin, we are able to distribute the total cost of the interceptor to a larger number of properties, thus lowering the anticipated cost per equivalent residential unit (ERU) from a previous low of $936 to potentially as low as $400. This makes the West Maplewood Alternative the least costly per ERU. In addition, due to the current proposal for development on the proposed former McMahon site, the City stands a good chance of a quick return on this parcel's fair share cost participation in the interceptor, thus reducing the likelihood that rate payers would have to "front" the cost of the Public Works Trust Fund loan payments. Attached is a matrix that covers the major issues previously presented, including taking the information that has come to light since our past meeting. In addition, a map showing the revised basin area for the West Maplewood Interceptor Alternative is also attached. RECOMMENDATION: Staff has revised its original recommendation of the East Maplewood Alternative in light of new information provided, including the sale of the former McMahon site as well as the ability to fund the West Maplewood Alternative through the Public Works Trust Fund Loan Program. In addition, strong public opposition, through King County, may unduly delay the East Maplewood Alternative.l as permittingIthe interest of meeting the needs of those parcels currently in the moratorium area, the West Maplewood Alternative provides an economical, as well as timely solution. Therefore, it is the recommendation of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department that the West Maplewood Alternative be selected as the preferred sewer interceptor route and that Council direct staff to begin final design and construction on this alternative. C:DOCS:93-196:DMC:ps BCC: Kay Shoudy CC: Council Members Mel Wilson Jay Covington Gregg Zimmerman Attachment ALTERNATIVE. INTERCEPTOR ALIGNMENTS ISSUES WEST MAPLEWOOD EAST MAPLEWOOD Solves Moratorium Would correct capacity problems to Would correct capacity problems to end moratorium in Heather Downs end moratorium in Heather Downs and Maplewood Subbasins. and Maplewood Subbasins U by Would havingA(vr lcl<}r: sct a > vyProtect Ma lewood Aquifer • :� '.• > ? a .;:.};::i> : b`:•'A uifer Protc ion . vim: 4t �` �ft : . ::thePotential to connect homes : lapfeood rst;yc :_-> :.in East Maplewood on septic systems _ esi .Ea}A to the swer sstem. Would require a `� - sewagelift station toacc accommodate south half of East Maplewood lewo od -----------------------------------------------------------------u S bbas' in. s;> o t teen ; 4OO to;;?«:?::>>:v::<<::<:::;{:_: Costper connection: 7 S 45 to Cost/Financing Q q fi f tat _v $g47/ERU can be financed with >P`u dic f` Trust~l etd<Loan :<>-o4 ggState Public Works Trust Fund loan. 0:•. a of cost r u+ � o::... .:::.:< ..;:.:~-.<: - .�:�[�.v.�::...... ::..:. 9394/o of cost recovered from :.}::?.}:{::::.::.:: {...........:.:.... .....:.: new connections. ..k:-:::.::..v+f-v.-.vi:{{iYC:::h:::i':{-.{-.:•.:-:j{i}i.:ri:>:iS{' :':'�{iJKs::: ..-.-..••••:::::::•-••^:::.w::•::C{:•::::::: .. ...:}i:8:ii::iiiS%tii:iii::ii rti:::i::`?:i::::iiji: Growth Management Implements Growth Management Act Implements Growth Management Consistency by extending City urban services to a Act by extending City urban services designated urban area and by to a designated urban area and by providing the opportunity to protect providing the opportunity toprotect the City's Maplewood Aquifer. the City's Maplewood Aquifer. YSlo # »1 ;o}}_: e. w <. }�}:.; >rsf..":>»}>: .; xt , Potentially increases nc rea ses slope s tab il it Slope StabilityWI 1 $cott } es ts it <-12. upon connection of homes in East Ie ofcss mto < Maplewood from septic systems to : we y�mo : nD.t r p < } — e < the system. Will require.t% Y, itiV� .f:} ?}sik: a` tx : ; descent of the lope adjacent' �- :iLt< .yrii.;Y : ::Ewc{ { rIMaplewood lleis eio ofo re} Maplewood Heights to the go ... . .. :} yi::.. i{i., isiris.Z:Viiatiil course to providethe sewer service .<� # vi ) vasef�iZseicef Traffic Disruption Approximately 6 months construction lot MIKNO r: Ids vii a :-::•�•::to<#or: t{ >:<><; time within NE 4th Street which has '?.t*r ,f`_' -'•••:`•• '-a•"{•}•.}:tel •••'�:'{`':':}-':----'" : '�::: "::i�-:Fi}:vi-v:\-?-i?:O:`.ii>'}rvii::i'vti•<i:X?::^ii}::i:::?i::.:�...-,.:�iiii?i:}i i{:-iii greater than 20 000 vehicles .:}.:-.>a,_.}....,::;}:-:::>.<::;,.}.i:-:i.}::.::}::::>i:::}i;:<}:;::::{{.?}.v:-?i trips per 10.1§iim> :>:<:}i::ii::<:i---;F:i::i: : ::>::<:>::::>:is:s>:i:::::}:<:;>:;:>::}<:iiil ::S:x>:>-:r:�>•`•f<:::i`:::i':';i:-::::tzi-: :'s'y':;k;:::;:::�:';<:::::::::::':;:i:^:t:•:,::;:::ii:::�::::i::i:: day. Environmentally Route has been revised as part of Route has been revised as part of Sensitive Areas FEIS to avoid critical areas such as FEIS to avoid critical areas such as wetlands and unstable slopes. wetlands and unstable slopes. Alternative Interceptor iments Page 2 • • ISSUES WEST MAPLEWOOD EAST MAPLEWOOD bj er 4.Mafiti:"::;art' itbi Viii ietii:>:::: Strongpublic opposition to this Public � p bl Interaction' coon ::< e0,41%:Ono Ctfy hag Bert:::w alternative from residents of approached egarding means lvr unincorporated King County in the t:rov diti sewer a$w ne op: < vicinity..... a....::� SediSof the route. Permitting ttin gii !idSzi:Y:.:.; ighto :;taidittani;;.. ;::;::: .. . ..:..:. ::;.;:.:�.:::::..::::.»::»:.:::<::::<:;::<::;::>.:;:_=:<.:::::;•;::»>::>::: Requires King County franchise right- 4.1..$Mgefittit and>SSftoretir:e>PetthitaMa>s of-way permit and sensitive areas evi ew. 3.060,1101#011 areas denote the preferred status. NOTES: O As a result of modifying the West Maplewood alternative to include the ability to serve the south half of the East Maplewood Subbasin, we have gained the ability to provide sanitary sewer service to all areas of potential concern from an aquifer protection standpoint within the project study area. This will allow us to continue to .evaluate the impacts of existing and future on-site sewage disposal systems on the City's aquifer knowing that if either the East Maplewood or,West Maplewood alternative is selected, we will be able to accommodate this service area. © The City received a response from the Public Works Trust Fund staff dated February 12, 1993 (copy attached) giving the City approval of a revised application package for the West Maplewood Alternative. © While public opposition should never be singularly a deciding factor when selecting an alternative, it does need to be fully evaluated and put into perspective when identifying the primary.goal and objective of a project. In the case of the East Renton Interceptor, while the East Maplewood Alternative best meets the long range plans for the study area from a pure planning and engineering standpoint, it also faces many potential delays as the result of almost certain litigation and permitting delays (through King County) caused by individuals strongly opposed to that alternative. The West Maplewood Alternative, on the other hand, because of its routing through the former McMahon site, has a proponent of the project in M. A. Segale, Inc. This company has already approached staff to pursue obtaining utility services for a potential development. In addition, its route is entirely within the City limits which greatly simplifies the permitting process. C:DOCS:93-190a:DMC:ps OF sTe'of fU.t. qA 1111 ' 'BARBARA GOODING "``i Director ki.till, j� 1IIV- lAB9 a I STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 906 Columbia St.SW • PO Box 48300 • Olympia, Washington 98504-8300 • (206)753-2200 Fet ;TA% bruary 12, 1993 1 David Christensen 51993 Public Works.Department FEa 1 City of Renton R�tiy10N 200 Mill Avenue South C1-�•(, er1rg Dept. Renton, Washington 98055 Engne RE: East Renton Interceptor Project Dear Dave: This letter is to confirm our February 10, 1993, conversation. The Public Works Trust Fund will accept the revised scope of work for the East Renton Interceptor project. The reasons for accepting the revised scope of work are as follows: 1) the problem, as identified in the original application, remains the same, 2) the alternatives for solving the problem were outlined in the original application, and 3)modifications to the scope of work are minor and the project costs remain the same. The city is to be commended for its conscientious and thorough effort. Good luck with project construction! • Sinnc//ereIyi '?PCLIA-4o Karin R. Berkholtz Timber and Emergency PWTF Programs Administrator KRB/krb ABANDON ABANDON , / HONEY DEW L.S. UNION 600 L.S. c+ y ::, /1 L-----.71 D� //-w`,21U I� L_ • r '� I NE 9th PL 1 r I jr!/�0j �� 7 —�`J r_________ _... z �* Q01,. , s1—i0 Ir INE 9th ST //%� — 7:7:7,.,..t.7.:. z NE 8lh PL � I I / ,{ :i:; > BOEING D Q \ :-.. Q 1 y I r•/ 1 x N 8th ST �` - --.•. :rr''ii 'i;iai: it;'i4 .: y/: a i NE 8lh 51 NE 7th ST li ✓ %/. sE:.s,: �.- x ::.::..:.::... a':•::s::::::-ii:' :`:. s r Mr 1 . i i!!:'::: i3zii:�:i:�:i: . :" Z n I 1 D rl I N E 6lh • :.:..:..::.:. I I i — N 6 E 6th .......... I` D 1 ST I - J I D F 6 i I :i:;.i: i:l::.:f: :: is E T SMAPWOOD16: Errs i'i: 44 e4ae D fl al. N4 404 h � :...:.....::. :.:... . .. ......:....:. . ... ...... ..:::. :::: .......:....:,..•Vi:: ;l'::. I t ST >aa ee• Oaaa �� F: r :?i is�:i"i:i:!: i: !:� Z Z ».•.. rte•' , aC i!iifi - - `��::i:i ...�> .........�::.,..:::. !.ps!ii 1i•i ._i. ..... . �:. :�lii::i��i;iiiii'iii`i:�� ir'i[:i `Y: R • - C OD o I esi?:ii:i:�:I< �:�:.:!:i:��:i::l C i NE X ':i?:!1:i:i:i:^):I CRY!:; :i,: ,.�':•R: :f"" l i'i's::ii :i$i;ii:rjai'ti s w ya:F..:yr i s I.I:��a 11111 ST : I moi. :��..:.' j `ii •' WAY N- I ::rr. :i:! }� • , NE \. ���g,1 + i` it 'i':!. ::::; 2nd ST g 1 . i .�..:. i ni Ii: I i:i f.{i,!3.'EI:-'7::�!'f i°:':':i:i: I SE 132nd J• W ?l^^^`" li I t LIBERTY � it 'I.e::.i..:::::. � I ipipuiP . - ; I �� PARK' :0:..I.iT.,11 (:i:Li El:L:!.:l.1 .I.•-' :I:i 1::1:H:::i:':':!. I� / CEDAR HT D :jiliiiiii. I IF:i::i: i ji� .z / / ii'tiil�tC:if: :it si:i:i:zi::F:i?a:it:- 1,1 :ii?lii :fi° �-7J ?W. �� { ci SE 1.36Ih ST I ... : :I••. .: PCEWOitI •A::.:; 1:: :' �• c•,:ili i:l:1: i H S IHim, I Lj CEDAIIII j � ' I NSE 1381h• III!:js:..:' ! ,..i�:i:�:i:.i:i i:a� I IT lin :'....'....:111:111:1F:... 'i:,;:'r SE stn ST ------------� / o EE i -�! �r W I NL soh I a �,.,� a „�a / �. Ri�R•� fir- T H _ \ AIAPLEWOOD \� ski ' GOLF COURSE I st uaa ST 17 !18 \�' 18 18PI NEW GRAVITY SEWER '-'-- ,,,,ii- jo :_SI_ n C ▪-•———- BASIN BOUNDARY i 1 31 123 -- - /� I CEDAR �� -"—'--"- CITY LIMIT , �9�4�0AA444°i°OOA� DIVERSION FROM I ' EAST RENT 0 N a°4x444°4°a44aa44� i A I IAAPLEWOOD — — .-- s Daae a�� HEATHER DOWNS BASIN i CALF COURSE 500 N'0 2000 %/ i, INVERSION H HIGHLANDS BASIN L p C- _ _____/ - INTERCEPTOR 1--j-. FIGURE 6 +?*y ,e`:' DIVERSION FROM • SCALE IN FEET f r�1 MAPLEWOOD BASIN Alternative 3 • West Maplewood Interceptor January 25, 1993 Renton City Council Minutes -- Page 39 Mayor Clymer also expressed gratitude to the Fire and Police Departments for their responses to citizens in need. INFORMATION ITEM Planning and Technical Services Division submitted the 1992 Planning Board/Commission: Commission Annual Report and 1993 work program for information. Planning Commission 1992 Annual Report and 1993 Work Program Board/Commission: Municipal Arts Commission Co-Chair, M. B. Escher, submitted the 1992 Municipal Arts - Municipal Arts Commission Annual Report for information. Commission 1992 Annual Report Mayor Clymer thanked the Municipal Arts Commission for the excellent service they provide to the City. CORRESPONDENCE Correspondence was entered into the record for future consideration Citizen Comment: regarding the Comprehensive Plan from Brian Kisling, Senior Planner, Comprehensive Plan Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc., 18215 - 72nd Avenue South, Kent 98032, and Oscar Schmuland, DMD, 300 Pelly Ave. North, Renton 98055. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY TANNER, REFER ALL CORRESPONDENCE TO THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE. CARRIED. Citizen Comment:East Correspondence was read from Richard H. and Elaine Galusha, 14013 Renton Interceptor S.E. 135th Street, Renton 98059, expressing support of the East Renton Interceptor project, alternative 1, for the following reasons: opportune financing; aquifer protection; lack of long-term benefits of smaller alternatives; and well-planned future growth. MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, REFER THIS CORRESPONDENCE TO THE UTILITIES COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Citizen Comment: Correspondence was read from Mary Ellen Hamblin, 13025 138th Avenue Hamblin - Intersection SE, Renton, stating that the left-turn-only lane at the intersection of NE Signal, NE 4th/Duvall 4th and Duvall Avenue NE is not clearly marked and creates a dangerous NE situation. MOVED BY TANNER, SECONDED BY EDWARDS, REFER THIS CORRESPONDENCE TO THE ADMINISTRATION. CARRIED. Citizen Comment: Correspondence was read from Mary Ellen Hamblin, representing East Hamblin - East Renton Renton Plateau Community Council, 12819 160th Avenue SE, Renton Interceptor 98055, requesting information on hookup costs for the East Renton Interceptor and the proposed timeframe for widening SE 128th Street. MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY TANNER, REFER THIS CORRESPONDENCE TO THE UTILITIES COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Upon Council inquiry, Mayor Clymer clarified that the East Renton Interceptor project is a trunk line, and a Local Improvement District would have to be formed by homeowners to share in the cost of the installation for connection to the line. ff. b . . • CJTVC . ° ' 'SON January 1.2, 1992 To: Renton City Council Renton City Clerk From: Richard H. Galusha . Elaine Galusha - 14013 S.E. 135th St. Renton, WA 98059 Subject: East Renton Interceptor Project After the January 11 , 1993 hearing and reading the " East Renton Interceptor Project Draft" from cover to cover, we are in full support of "East Renton Interceptor Alternative No. 1" , for the following reasons. 1 . Financing for this Alternative number 1 can and will be granted. . 2. Whether the aquifer is contaminate at the present is a question on both sides of the issue, however, in three • to five to ten years will it be? I would think yes At • would, and then what is the cost to clean it up? 3. If we go with one of the smaller alternatives what is the cost when we have out grown them in five to ten . years, when we will really have to address the aquifer and .growth? 4. We cannot build a fence around our area, whether we would like to or not, we are .going to have. growth, we have to have good planned growth, we have to go with planning that allows for the future growth. We now have a comprehensive plan along with an excellent - plan for the Renton Interceptor (Alternative No. 1). As law and policy makers it is your responsibility to the public to get the biggest bang for the buck, and that As Alternative No. 1 . As the Renton City Council has shown in the past, sometimes it takes courage to make the correct decisi n when there is disagreement. among the public that is b ng served. We have full confidence in your courage and ead rship .to-- ake the c ect decision. .1 S ; rely, /� r •i - °a d .ard�E .1 ,4_, ugh mak. , C��/ 4,&1A--L. fid . EAST RENTON PLATEAU COMMUNITY COUNCIL 12819 - 160th Ave. S.E. Renton, Washington 98055 January 19, 1993 CITY OF RENTON City of Renton JAN ? 1993 Utilities Dept. ;�.jJ 200 Mill Ave. S. LEREK'S OEFiC! Renton, WA. 98055 CITY CLERK'S Attention: Dave Christenson; Many members of our organization were unable to attend the public hearing on the East Renton Interceptor. Therefore, we are interested in getting some hard-copy data to pass on to them. We request a statement of costs associated with hook-up for individual homeowners. We recognize that different costs may derive based on some different situations but we are ask- ing some specifics with regard to three circumstances. First, what would typical costs be for a single house on a 9600 SF lot? What would the cost be for a single house on a 15,00 SF lot? What would be the costs for a single house on a 2 - acre plot 330x330 feet square? Please discuss the formula used. Is it the .zone and termini system? Please explain that. We are interested in what would be a worst-case scenario. We re-call the Sierra Heights landowner with five acres that was charged $72,000 and she was not hooking up. ' Please clarify the City ordinances or other regulations that deal with who is required to hook-up as well as the issue of being compelled to hook-up. During the hearing there was discussion of the widing of S.E. 128 to seven lanes. What is the timing on that and what is the necessity for it. Thank you in advance for your assistance . Yours truly,, Mary Ellen Hamblin Secretary cc : City Council City Clerk RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting January 11, 1993 Municipal Building Monday, 7:30 p.m. Council Chambers MINUTES CALL TO Mayor Earl Clymer led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and called the ORDER meeting of the Renton City Council to order. ROLL CALL OF BOB EDWARDS, Council President; RICHARD STREDICKE; KATHY COUNCILMEMBERS KEOLKER-WHEELER, JESSE TANNER; TONI NELSON; NANCY • MATHEWS; TIM SCHLITZER. CITY STAFF IN EARL CLYMER, Mayor; JAY COVINGTON, Executive Assistant to the ATTENDANCE Mayor; ZANETTA FONTES, Assistant City Attorney; MARILYN PETERSEN, City Clerk; LYNN GUTTMANN, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator; GREGG ZIMMERMAN, Utility Systems Director; DAVE CHRISTENSEN, Engineering Specialist; LENORA BLAUMAN, Senior Planner; CAPTAIN DON PERSSON, Police Department. PRESS Dean Radford, Valley Daily News APPROVAL OF MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY SCHLITZER, COUNCIL COUNCIL MINUTES APPROVE THE MINUTES OF JANUARY 4, 1993, AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and Public Works: East published in accordance with local and State laws, Mayor Clymer opened Renton Interceptor the public hearing to consider the selection of a preferred alternative for the East Renton Interceptor project. Gregg Zimmerman, Utility Systems Director, presented a history and review of the events leading up to the selection of the four interceptor alternatives which include: East Maplewood alignment; South Highlands alignment; West Maplewood alignment; and no action. Dave Christensen, Wastewater Utility Project Manager, discussed the three action alternatives. East Maplewood AIternative (preferred): This selected route starts at Bremerton Avenue NE and goes east along the NE 4th/SE 128th corridor to 138th Avenue SE where it goes south through the existing single- family neighborhoods. Selecting this route avoided a number of environmentally sensitive areas. South Highlands Alternative: This alternative will not be able to serve the south boundary from SE 128th to the ridge. The service area would be greatly reduced thus increasing the potential cost for each connection. The route would start at 138th Avenue SE and travel west along the NE4th/NE3rd corridor crossing under I-405 and connecting. The exact connection has not been determined but it is anticipated to be near the North Third Street corridor. January 11. 1993 Renton City Council Minutes Page 14 West Maplewood Alternative: This route is similar to the South Highlands alternative except that the service area would include the area known as the McMahon property and other vacant parcels along the south boundaries. It would serve 'the same upper basin as South Highlands and would not provide any service to the southern portion of the basin south of SE 128th Street. The route would start at 138th Avenue SE, go west to the King County Health Department site and proceed south, connecting to the existing Metro Cedar River trunk line. The following plans were reviewed to achieve consistency: the City of Renton Comprehensive Land Use Plan of 1986; the updated Renton Comprehensive Land Use Plan; the City of Renton zoning code; the City of Renton aquifer protection ordinance; the King County Comprehensive Plan of 1985; the King County General Sewerage Plan of 1985; the Newcastle Community Plan of 1982; the King County zoning code; the King County sensitive area ordinance; and the Washington State Growth Management Act. It was determined that none of the alternatives would comply with all of the existing documents because of contradictions between the plans. Mr. Christensen pointed out that once an alternative is selected, a mitigation document will be published outlining the adverse impacts of the preferred alternative. After the 20-day comment and appeal period is finished and the project is approved, permitting and final design of the preferred alternative will begin. Construction could begin sometime late this year. The five critical issues for selecting the preferred alternative for the interceptor project include: removing the sewer moratorium for the Heather Downs, Maplewood, and a portion of the South Highlands sub- basins; providing aquifer protection; incurring the least cost per connection; providing consistency with the Growth Management Act; and increasing slope stability. Upon Council inquiry, Mr. Christensen clarified that if the preferred alternative is selected, the $2.6 million interceptor project funding would come from the Public Works Trust Fund in the form of a 20-year loan at a 2% interest rate. If another route is chosen, the City would have to submit a revised plan and perhaps be re-ranked to a lower number. The pay back figures were developed by estimating full development of the entire basin. If full development does not occur, or the area is left in a more rural character, then City reimbursement would come in the form of increased rates within the City limits. Lynn Guttmann, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator, further explained that SEPA requires a worst-case scenario be used when designing an interceptor. In this case, the worst-case represents more connections. The City Council has adopted conservation resource zones, and urban separators will be maintained whenever possible. Correspondence was entered into record as opposing the proposed East Renton Interceptor from: Mr. and Mrs. Mark Quintinskie, 14403 SE 139th Place, Renton 98059; Harold and Roxaine R. Reynolds, 13016 - 156th Ave. SE, Renton 98059; W. Clark and Dana Phillips, 14001 - 145th Ave. January 11. 1993 Renton City Council Minutes Page 15 SE, Renton 98059; Warren F. Vaupel, P. 0. Box 755, Renton 98057; George Porter, 13005 - 138th Avenue SE, Renton 98059; Mary Ellen & Donald Hamblin, 13025 - 138th Avenue SE, Renton 98059. Mr. Christensen explained that the planning of the preferred East Maplewood alternative looked at the ultimate long-term benefits of the interceptor. The east plateau area is within the active annexation area and the urban service boundary that has been identified by the Growth Management Planning Council for the County and supported by the City. Lynn Guttmann, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator, further clarified that community level planning of this project has not been done, but staff has been working with area residents and King County planning staff. The area is not completely urban but the City should be providing urban services instead of special sewer districts, and not developing the area to rural standards. Mr. Christensen reported that King County has plans to resurface 144th Street and City staff is evaluating the possibility of bringing the sewer line further on SE 128th to meet 144th. It appears to be more costly but further study will be done. The proposed East Maplewood alternative potentially would disrupt the SE 4th/SE 128th corridor and a portion of 138th as well as a segment of 144th Avenue SE. The West Maplewood alternative would disrupt the area from 138th Avenue SE along the NE 4th/SE 128th corridor to the Health Department offices. The South Highlands alternative would run from 138th Avenue SE along the NE 4th/SE 128th corridor and then crosses the I-405 corridor into the North 3rd Street area. Mr. Christensen further noted that the average depth of the East Maplewood pipeline route would be between 20 - 25 feet; the other alternatives go to about 30 feet. Audience comment was invited. The following residents spoke in opposition to the East Maplewood alternative: Ray Griffin, 14306 - 144th Avenue SE, Renton 98059; Everett Wilcock, 11830 - 164th Avenue SE, Renton 98059; Dan Potoshnik, 13405 - 142nd Avenue SE, Renton 98059; Marlene Vickers, 13419 SE 141st Street, Renton 98059; Allen Werner, 14238 - 143rd Avenue SE, Renton 98059; Andrew Duffus, business address: 701 Sunset Boulevard NE, Renton 98056; Larry Vickers, 13419 SE 141st Street, Renton 98059; Liz Mencel, 13803 SE 144th Street, Renton 98059; Jacquelyn Randall, 14603 SE 140th, Renton 98059; Paul Lindberg, 13836 SE 131st, Renton 98059; Elizabeth Close, 13715 139th Avenue SE, Renton 98059; Donald L. Johnson, 13649 - 140th Place SE, Renton 98059; Versie Vaupel, P 0 Box 755, Renton 98057. Citizen opposition to the East Maplewood alternative was for the following reasons: Newcastle Plan forbids sewers on the East Renton Plateau; Traffic problems will occur with street closures; Danger to the Renton aquifer is not because of septic systems, and more danger could result because of sewers. Not enough supporting facts. Efforts will be duplicated in demolition and rebuilding affected streets; January 11. 1993 Renton City Council Minutes Page 16 Homes and property will be endangered because of the steep slope due to potential slides; There is no justification to build a sewer interceptor in King County; Installation of sewer lines will encourage high density building; Sewer construction is risky in fragile, environmentally sensitive areas; King County Water District 90 has not been consulted; In general, King County area residents do not want annexation or inclusion in the City project. Ray Griffin also expressed the opinion that the South Highlands alternative would be preferred because Renton can gain: sewer capacity; accommodate growth protection to the aquifer; lift the current sewer moratorium; replace old sewer lines; minimize future traffic delays; and locate the entire system within the City limits which would not require county permits. Dan Potoshnik also stated his preference for the West Maplewood route. He felt that the route is much shorter and straighter; meets the Maple Valley Highway Metro line at a closer point; provides better protection for the aquifer in times of natural disasters; provides an easier slope to the valley floor; is located within City limits for permitting control; and avoids the downtown and I-405 area. He submitted a petition containing an additional eight signatures opposing the East Renton Interceptor line running through King County. (The original petition containing 10 signatures was presented at the 12/7/92 Council meeting.) The following spoke in favor of the East Maplewood route: Ty Ribera, 14829 SE 128th, Renton 98059; Dean Tibbitt, 17003 NE 28th Place, Bellevue 98008; Todd Woosley, Burnstead Construction Company, 1215 120th Avenue NE, Suite 201, Bellevue 98005; Paul Brandal, 1309 Sunnyside Boulevard, Everett. Reasons given for preference to the East Maplewood alternative included: Supports future growth and expansion of the area; Recognizes the Renton sphere of influence; Accepts mandates of State of Washington and the Growth Management Act; Takes advantage of available financing; Serves the largest area within the urban growth boundary; Provides the least cost per unit served; Protects the aquifer; Lifting the sewer moratorium will allow development and land sales to proceed. General comments were expressed by: Dick George, 13845 SE 131st, Renton 98059; Brian Smith, 14805 SE 139th Court, Renton; Diane Krom, 14042 - 144th Avenue SE, Renton 98059; Kathleen Jett, 583 Kirkland Avenue NE, Renton 98056. Questions and concerns were: What is the project objective and what area is going to be served? How will spillage be prevented? Will all existing sewer problems be addressed by the new interceptor? January 11. 1993 Renton City Council Minutes Pane 17 How will methods used in determining City cost reimbursement be validated? The sewer line will precede urban services planning. What are estimated costs to connect to the line? Will the proposed interceptor relieve the overloaded sewers in the South Highlands area? Recess MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY EDWARDS, COUNCIL RECESS FOR TEN MINUTES. CARRIED. Time 9:28 p.m. The Council meeting reconvened at 9:38 p.m.; roll was called; all members were present. In response to questions and concerns, Jeff Clayton, staff geologist for RH2 Engineering, assured that no new weakness in the slope will be created by the placement of the East Maplewood sewer line. There may be some strengthening of this area because the line will allow the slope to dry out. Excavation will be done when the ground is driest and construction techniques will be used to minimize the vibrations. Mr. Clayton also stated that the sewer line will be built to watermain specifications and that water resistant materials combined with collars around the pipeline will make it easier to identify seepage early. Water in the deep and middle aquifer is being fed from higher up, not the Cedar River. Testing and monitoring of the line will be done through flow measurements and ground water testing. Mr. Christensen clarified that the cost per unit described on the handout represents the cost of the interceptor project only. Residential assessments will not be made until hook-up is requested. Additional costs for collection systems, side sewer connection, a city connection fee, and permit fee will be incurred at time of hook-up. At this time only residents living in Zone 1 of the City are required to hook-up to sewer lines. All new single-family construction within 330 feet of a sewer line and all new industrial/commercial construction are required to connect. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY TANNER, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THE SELECTION OF A PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE FOR THE EAST RENTON INTERCEPTOR PROJECT. CARRIED. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY EDWARDS, COUNCIL REFER THIS MATTER TO THE UTILITIES COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Recess MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL RECESS FOR FIVE MINUTES. CARRIED. Time 10:22 p.m. The Council meeting reconvened at 10:27 p.m.; roll was called; all members were present. AUDIENCE Alan and Kathleen Jett, 583 Kirkland Avenue NE, Renton 98056, COMMENT submitted a letter and additional signatures expressing their gratitude to Citizen Comment: Jett Council and City staff in working together with the community to solve - Residential Parking the parking problems in the area adjacent to Renton Technical College on Problems, Renton Kirkland Avenue NE between NE Fifth and NE Seventh. Technical College I FREQUENTLY ASKED EAST RENTON INTERCEPTOR QUESTIONS Wouldn't the East Maplewood Alternative conflict with the Newcastle Community Plan EAST RENTON INTERCEPTOR and the King County Sewerage General Plan? SELECTING THE ALIGNMENT The Newcastle Community and King County Sewerage General Plans are over ten years old and inconsis- 4 i ® r....NE ""V//�hIL 1 I�� a t tent with the Growth Management Act the 1985 King County Comprehensive Plan and the 1992. adopted Q Countywide Framework Policies (which established the Urban Growth Area). Thus,while the East 1 THREE ALTERNATIVES U i' tyw } � � �. < Maplewood Alternative may be inconsistent with the Newcastle Community Plan and/or the Sewerage CI� Lill L_IL�` 4 _ N General Plan, Renton believes that its decisions must be guided b the most recent) adopted plans and n \ �+ 7111 -- — _. Pjli ._ _._._— policies Y Y p ST and the need to protect public health and safety. These plans and policies are all in agreement that i []t� 1 1`_ the study area is an Urban Area which should be provided urban services by a City On this case Renton). ' n�� ��` -►, SNE 6a :pa SOUTH HIGHLANDS - Entire route is within City.—�INEett,SA EAST MAPLEWOOD - Begins within the city and .( Will construction of the East Maplewood or West Maplewood Interceptors destabilize Followsnethe NE 3rd/NE 4th Street corridor until �L�I Countytravelsouth through unincorporatedheCedar King I P P p connecting to a new METRO interceptor in � until descending the River Valley , ii, the steep slope on the southern edge of the East Renton plateau? Factory Avenue North. above the Maplewood Golf Course and ,� i ' connecting to METRO's Cedar River Interce tp or. Nos. ,411 i� r � �. h- Installing pipelines on steep slopes always requires careful planning. Proper geotechnical engineering can =E!I' --�-- ,, , "�."h ST s �� _ -- 1 SE �,sT �; solve all the possible problems related to the construction of either of these interceptors. �.,� I fENlREF7TW00D ETERY ' I� — Who will pay for the interceptor? !Fir • '• ,001.7 ii 1.1 I NE�� �� I. i : te.OLKT + NE 2nd 5T t r e= The City of Renton will finance the interceptor through utility rates. Repayment of these costs will come from '-; I., 1� CEMETERY . i I �� w fees from new connections,through a special Assessment District as well as potentially from state grants. ' , '�� —_, i j i E._ ,r, Will building the interceptor cause the East Renton Plateau to be developed at high ._._._".4_._._._.e_.______L_._._.—._..._._.�,� V.IIC �- \\� fc I �` I 5iits r 'I I densities? l r e The King County Growth Management Planning Council designated the entire study area as an urban growth i ��s9 I.a g 5>h ST c�-- area within the City of Renton's sphere of influence. As such, it must be provided with urban levels of services y such as sewers. Sewers by themselves do not cause high density development The City will review each y.�� MAPLEWOOD �`4'�n 1'y�,i development proposal for the area to make sure it is consistent with Renton land use and environmental � � � GOLFODUREE i -+f policies. WEST MAPLEWOOD - Begins within the City an �` .---._14.}#_. '�1 �I travels south along the NE 3rd/NE 4th Street 2] 22 "-"'"-""- •-•- -•--LL County residents cannot connect to Renton's sewer system. Is the City of Renton corridor until turning south at Edmonds Avenue �okr �+ — and descending the Cedar Valley to connect to I N a I planning to annex the study area? the METRO Cedar River Interceptor in the Maple 11a>usE ,/ i Valley Highway. ,� _ 4 As stated above,the study area has been designated an urban area within Renton's sphere of influence. The King County growth policies also state•cities should provide urban services, in this case sewers,to urban BACKGROUND areas. However,the residents must still petition the City for annexation to occur. Will building the sewer interceptor cause the East Renton Plateau to be developed, In June 1989,the Renton City Council imposed a moratorium on new connections to the sewer system in increasing traffic congestions and stormwater runoff? the northeastern area of the City. The moratorium resulted from two engineering investigations,which found the sewer system lacked capacity to accommodate additional wastewater flows from proposed As stated above,the City of Renton would review any development proposal to ensure it meets traffic • developments in that area. In 1992,the City Council extended the moratorium through August 31, 1993. standards and environmental regulations. Renton is committed to adequate stormwater management ' because increased runoff means decreased recharge of Renton's drinking water supplies. Renton has The engineering investigations proposed four possible interceptors that would each solve the capacity . adopted stormwater standards that are equivalent to King County's standards. problem to varying degrees in all three affected sewage basins: South Highlands, Heather Downs and Why can't the failing septic tanks be rebuilt instead of building a sewer interceptor? Maplewood. In July 1989,the City Council selected three of those alternatives for further study in an Environmental Impact Statement(EIS) and Predesign Report. It is not possible to rebuild septic systems in the Maplewood Heights area to meet today's strict standards because of the small lots,the nearness to the cliff, and the area's permeable soils. - 4 East Renton Int eptor Timeline BACKGROUND (Cont'd) 1989 I 1990 I 1991 I 144 I 1993 I 1994 I i i I I Engineering Predesign Report Design and Build Selected Alignment East Renton Predesign Report® (July 1992) Investigation I I ii I Moratorium I I SelectI l The Predesign Report presents an engineering design and Declared I I I Alignment I I tannin anal sis of the three interceptors and reco ;:>:.:<::::,<:> >:::.::.::.:.::: :.:.. ...._. :.:.. : •>:.:>::::=::;: .:..;<:.:;:;.;:. planning y erecommends the oraftEnwronm�ntalat►i actstatement': ° E S.Sco to East Maplewood Interceptor the preferred alternative. The II p P report documents that the East Maplewood Interceptor would best comply with adopted land use plans, environmental regulations and engineering design and construction criteria. The East Alternative Interceptor Alignments Maplewood Interceptor is also the least cost alternative;both in total capital cost and cost per connection. .:....:>;..:..:.>::::::.::: :;; .;:.::.:::;::;:.;.<.:,: p 'gtreff:Recommended : SOUTH HIGHLANDS WEST P O D East Renton Environmental Im nt MA LEINO ................. n act Stnteri�a (Draft P ISSUES November 1991. Final November 1992) •••......,....••.__,......,...,.. ��• - � �- - - Wouldrto ......:..:.:.:.: >;: >:<:><: <>::::>,:<:::::.:::.>..::.. :.: >.::::.;:::;::. correct ca aci pro to The EIS analyzed how the environment would be affected by Solves1JiuldAcorregt<ca . cl., . rab:�erri.$;to:end::<?;;:; p tY pWould correct capac'iy problems end or tori i H tDowns and m a um n ea her n Downs and buildingeach of the proposed interceptors. T i IDow dhe env environmental moratorium inHeather Moratorium end p prrt. �. n.H a#h .a..r1. � d analysis was conducted accordingto the rules of the Washington Maplewood Subbaslns. Ma lewood Subbasins. Y :fate :I+awo�:d.�ub��s.,in� <; >'_:<> :><<�: >':_ `< :<� '.::: p t S ate Environmental Poli d EPA Theanalyses A S included Policy )• public meetings. g '�< WouldnotEast sin Ea S t :'`�a�i�"�<`' connect homes in Would not connect home �l!t.:_.:lrl :rott �;t�?la "Iiev�aiatl :":ui{�rla:: '�:>:::.::: How The EIS and Predesign Report Are Related ::;:: :: .. .:::.:>::; :>:::::.:::.:::.<::::><:;.p:::;.::<::., ' :>::. :,<.:. 9 P Aquifer ;: > r.e in` azarr a <ii est>1+tla le io d.or;i <<: Ma lewood on septic which are Ma lewood on se tictanks,which are Protection t ....:g.;. :.I .: p p P p water ' in ''. canter i ti Renton's drinking water ontam'na s drink "`�"tics"s#�''`;a>£��'#� �< �:>;::�::<.: :€ ;LA > m na n R n were Wb 1 tin Renton The Predesi n Report and EIS were prepared inan iterative et4 ;: nl::<..p::._;;>:>s r r $ ;:::.,,,:,:::... g g g g g p e p p • supply. supply. process in which the results of one affected the other. Siecificall pp Y• pP Y• p Y tidentified ._....... ....... .:... .......... he environmental im ads in the Draft EIS he ed form pP selecting thepreferredi h r the basisfor d n t e P Predesign g g Hi hest ost e i n Intermediate cost per conn action <:Ir` #jos. .er.. onto .d 'ri'``_<' v<i��<: c r conned o Re ort. The results of the Predesi n Re ort were then e:.�s;..:, �: :.:�. �: .tn.:,.. . g p p p g P 177 4 83 ER 936 1 $ 8 ER u incorporated into the environmentalanalysesf �..>,......',w_,...�......,�<:°� 1 8 u 0 r o the Final EIS. •��� � � ��"• . • p ith s tate for • i vat w no be eli ible financing with State a be eligible for M t M f anG .dA"�".�St�itc. ' <;i% <�.c".='„< >�> financing Lastly, results of the Final EIS will be incorporated into the final C..,;;:.::.>:rt..::.:..:,.;e:. v,�tt:.;.„:.:.;..._.;::..>FPub.,:.�.' .:��$;•:< : � gg � g Y p — C s i 0 1= nankin g - L Tri' "F�`<�'< ::�A>�-` �`���<� `'<�`?�`'�>`'«�<r<>'� >>_ �;: PWTF Loan. P'�IlTF oan. design ofthe Interceptor. :;:...:rt,.,,,L �.::-.,:::�::�::::.:��:-,�:<:.:;�::>:;:::::: <:::;�:::::><�:;�:<::::::::>>;: gp - o 0 t recovered from 90 92 0 of c st r cov from ne w 94.:�.a..ccr,t.re ue o >fro `r ` >:t >>A ' 66-67% 6 87 0 of cos ecovered om new o e erect tonne ions ctiriii��: ort .,::::1 connections. d ctt What Happens Next? :>::.::.::.::::::.::.:::.::>:<.::::;:::.;:-::< < «i>`'> n PP of theCity will t ore arts >>.:<<>°:::�.:<;:<:<::;>:::;� .:�:.:': ; :.::..>:.;.;.: :;._:.:.::.::.:...... .......:. : ::,.......:;, Partials im laments GMA b extend) n The Utility Committee s udy the tw p <I:rim'";I.�r�terit��rntfl:;hA�taa�ementr�ct�b..,.'' Partially'mplemen#s GMA by extending y p y g Growth p ;:.:.:.:.;. Y and recommend a preferred alternative to the City Council. The full extendin Ci urb an sero ces to a City urban services to a designated City urban services to a designated Management C'ty Council will also elicit public comments at public meetings and _ designated url�art; ireand:b.<.; rotadtrM Urban Area but does not provide a Urban Area but does not provide a Consistency s en tMaplewood t an :::<:.>.>:<::.:....:.:..:::... :;.:..>:,.:::.:;;:>:.:,::::><:.<>::::::>::<.>:<:;:::;',;.:.<::<:»<: ........:. . :.,. means to rated he City's then select an alternative. After the City Council selects #f�e:ra"'""artiatti:�`:<ti3`"rote��#th�>�'►. :<s:<:>:<.;<:::;::<;: >::> means to protect City's Maplewood p w ommittee .<:><::::l :: >:i , <: ::;:<. : :;.=:>:<:: : :: :: :;>:> ifer. alternative, 'twill direct. City's Environmental Revie C fila'lewov.�a°A uifer,>:r:>:;::: <; >:><>::>: :<:::<::>><: Aquifer. aqu o ument will mitigation c eat. That d o to prepare a construction document.p r di na mayarise during the const u o an identifyproblems thatred n g >: '<>s Q e stabs["�>> `; �:�<:: ::<<�<': <\> <::Increases>..: 1 :.::,.::..:::..:...Ili y; ?►n ding>:>.::,; Would not serve East Ma lewood home Would not serve East Ma lewood homes r' mend conditions that p p operation f the sewe Interce for and recom 0 p - Slo a St abili P tY m .'i1. . -.:<:.:11/2.:.,.,plewl4°d>s is l stc_:.::.' ' .-”; se tic tanks,which are dischar in se tic tanks,which are;r,:.;.6,:i!.tothoseproblems.will be imposed 1 g >.srstms to.heisi seer.sstem;,.;,;:... ;,,,;;;;.::;,;,.;:.;,: wastewater and destabilizin the steepwastewater and destabilizing the steep g g slopes above the Maplewood Golf slopes above the Maplewood Golf nurse. C arse. Co 2 3 ,..__ . . , ___. • • i\TOT ICE . , RENTON CITY COUNCIL HEARING • ON' JANUARY 11, 1993, AT • 7:30 P. M. RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING COUNCIL CHAMBERS • 200. MILL AVENUE SOUTH SELECTION OF A PREFERRED ' ALTERNATIVE SITE FOR THE EAST RENTON INTERCEPTOR PROJECT ALL INTERESTED PARTIES ARE INVITED TO ATTEND AND PRESENT WRITTEN AND/OR ORAL COMMENTS. FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, PLEASE CALL 235-2501 . EAST RENTON INTERCEPTOR SELECTING THE ALIGNMENT • AMTHREE ALTERNATIVES ,UM isi Imo/ jNi�t � I i WBVIIPANEVAIMMIIIZIERifin SOUTH HIGHLANDS — Entire route is within City.m. mi LEAST MAPLEW00D .— Begins within the-city and Follows the NE 3rd/NE 4th Street corridor until travels south through unincorporated King connecting to o new METRO interceptor in County until descending the Cedar River Valley Factory Avenue North. above the Maplewood Golf Course and I connectin. to METRO's Cedar River Interceptor. OA, . AllW. Il`}dR I 7,� • 1R.RMT ; i K`fiE 57 w-"it. ir,.., RME7FRf ' I VW KW -i - <Y r i i I (y f 1 B Y Sq Si II I I`Aiii: � 1.1.1rr ,1� 1$ 3S ' ///< i' WEST MAPLEWOOD — Begins within the City anIllitta,d ` .— _ ' travels south along the NE 3rd/NE 4th Street — 21.22 """"'r —•— —22 corridor until turning south at Edmonds Avenue OmI and descending the Cedar Volley to connect to eitfb— -4 I the METRO Cedar River Interceptor in-the Maple . _ s = '''''``.mcI\ Valley Highway. •—•—._._•• § .1 �_._i_l_._'��C-1\.._1 r . • Complete legal description &further information available in the City Clerks Office - 235-2501. IIII a The removal, mutilation, destruction or concealment of thWa is notice is a mis- rilling , ... demeanor punishable. by fine and imprisonment. If VO, °' OF RENTON kalL Administrative Services Earl Clymer, Mayor Dan Clements, Director NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING EAST RENTON INTERCEPTOR - SELECTION OF PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE Renton City Council January 11, 1993 YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that the Renton City Council will hold a public hearing at 7:30 PM on January 11, 1993, to consider selection of a preferred alternative for the East Renton Interceptor project. The public hearing will.be held in the second floor Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Written protests may be filed with the City Clerk at or prior to the time fixed for the hearing. Protests should contain identifying descriptions of the property. Persons may otherwise appear and present their opinions orally; however, all protests must be submitted in writing. The primary purpose of the East Renton Interceptor project is to relieve current capacity restraints within the Maplewood, Heather Downs and a portion of the South Highlands Sub-basins. There currently exists a moratorium of new connections to the sewer system in this area. This project will permit the City to remove the moratorium. In addition, the project will provide different levels of future service area and capacity depending upon which alternative is selected. Upon selection of an alternative by Council, Wastewater Utility staff and Planning staff will prepare a mitigation document on the selected alternative for approval by the City's Environmental Review Committee. This document will be subject to a twenty day comment and appeal period in accordance with City adopted SEPA regulations. For additional information, please contact David Christensen of the Wastewater Utility Section at 277-6212. Sincerely, cr,/ r iLnJ Marilyn J! Pette sen, CMC City Clerk C:DOCS:92-1002:DMC:ps CC: Mayor Earl Clymer Lynn Guttmann David M. Christensen c \ 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 ►- ' I + , - FREQUENTLY ASKED EAST RENTON INTERCEPTOR QUESTIONS Wouldn't the East Maplewood Alternative conflict with the Newcastle Community Plan EAST RENTON INTERCEPTOR the King County Sewerage General Plan? SELECTING THE ALIGNMENT The Newcastle Community and King County Sewerage General Plans are over ten years old and inconsis- . � �� LILif ----4fi ' , tent with the Growth Management Act the 1985 King County Comprehensive Plan and the 1992 adopted + ® VI NE eN. %/� Countywide Framework Policies (which established the Urban Growth Area). Thus,while the East 1 THREE ALTERNATIVES - 11111 Maplewood Alternative may be inconsistent with the Newcastle Community Plan and/or the Sewerage a - _ —< LJL�� 1 N General Plan, Renton believes that its decisions must be guided by the most recently adopted plans and sr + ate NE 7th - MAI _.— and the need toprotectpublic health and safety. Theseplans andpolicies ' ~ policiesty po cies are all in agreement i � �� 1 ;I the study area is an Urban Area which should be provided urban services by a City(in this case Renton). 1�� �o � ,NE 6 SOUTH HIGHLANDS — Entire route is within City.--Nem, EAST MAPLEWOOD — Begins within the city and yi Will construction of the East Maplewood or West Maplewood Interceptors destabilize Follows the NE 3rd/NE 4th Street corridor until travels south through unincorporated King &i connecting to a new METRO interceptor in County until descending the Cedar River Valley the steep slope on the southern edge of the East Renton plateau? Factory Avenue North. above the Maplewood Golf Course and I fr ��� i���•� connectins to METRO'S Cedar River Interce tor. gpp p p Y q p g p g g g N�msr .`i% �`. ���Installin i elines on stee slo es alwa s re uires careful lannin Pro er eotechnical en ineerin can � �� + 5T s IDsolve all the ossible roblems related to the construction of either of these Interce tors. Ld /11 L. .'� 5T wp p p .,�rivi *4 wstwchy—'"" miEmn nil Who will pay for the interceptor? ! "�'��` �' + 1 �i0L* i • NE 2nd S7 ti7 E. : r a- The City of Renton will finance the interceptor through utility rates. Repayment of these costs will come from I milIOW 111 , bi fees from new connections,through a special Assessment District,as well as potentially from state grants. ,-'21>, + i + I Will building the interceptor cause the East Renton Plateau to be developed at high densities? ' `., %f404, i ►` 1� The King County Growth Management Planning Council designated the entire study area as an urban growth i r�g�I.® g 5m si I r✓ area within the City of Renton's sphere of influence. As such, it must be provided with urban levels of services -- such as sewers. Sewers by themselves do not cause high density development. The City will review each 4 1 i •°°� �Y. �� ~C_ MAPLDIOOD development proposal for the area to make sure it is consistent with Renton land use and environmental p ���\ � i :� policies. WEST MAPLEWOOD — Begins within the City and _ +�_. a I` travels south along the NE 3rd/NE 4th Street ` 21i� „— .—._ County residents cannot connect to Renton's sewer system. Is the City of Renton corridor until turning south at Edmonds Avenue toy • and descending the Cedar Valley to connect to �, � planning to annex the study area? the METRO Cedar River Interceptor in the Maple ax�E a Valley Highway. ',or.. 31 � — I As stated above,the study area has been designated an urban area within Renton's sphere of influence. The King County growth policies also state cities should provide urban services, in this case sewers,to urban BACKGROUND areas. However,the residents must still petition the City for annexation to occur. Will building the sewer interceptor cause the East Renton Plateau to be developed, In June 1989,the Renton City Council imposed a moratorium on new connections to the sewer system in increasing traffic congestions and stormwater runoff? the northeastern area of the City. The moratorium resulted from two engineering investigations,which found the sewer system lacked capacity to accommodate additional wastewater flows from proposed As stated above,the City of Renton would review any development proposal to ensure it meets traffic developments in that area. In 1992,the City Council extended the moratorium through August 31, 1993. standards and environmental regulations. Renton is committed to adequate stormwater management because increased runoff means decreased recharge of Renton's drinking water supplies. Renton has The engineering investigations proposed four possible interceptors that would each solve the capacity adopted stormwater standards that are equivalent to King County's standards. problem to varying degrees in all three affected sewage basins: South Highlands, Heather Downs and Why can't the failing septic tanks be rebuilt instead of building a sewer interceptor? Maplewood. In July 1989,the City Council selected three of those alternatives for further study in an Environmental Impact Statement(EIS) and Predesign Report. It is not possible to rebuild septic systems in the Maplewood Heights area to meet today's strict standards because of the small lots,the nearness to the cliff, and the area's permeable soils. 4 East Renton Intei _41tor Timeline BACKGROUND (Cont'd) 1989 - I - 1990 I 1991 I 1992 I 1993 I 1994 I i I. I t East Renton Predesign Report m (July 1992) Investigation Predesign Report I Design and Build Selected Alignment. at Moratorium I I Select ,I I I The Predesign Report presents an engineering design and Declared Alignment planning interceptors and recommends the rdt`r~r�rc-::.::::+�'ai<t'in � ►ire'� �t�:`�s`:`<'::' `:_>�<� :'; I t=ide in : n R.: m.. ,i.. .).. .:.. it at: 15>..::..::::: I East Maplewood Interceptor as the preferred alternative. h I • I p p Te report documents that the East Maplewood Interceptor would best comply with adopted land use plans, environmental regulations • and engineering design and construction criteria. The East Alternative Interceptor Alignments Maplewood Interceptor is also the least cost alternative;both in total capital cost and cost per connection. p wx to _4 #> SOUTH HIGHLANDS Draft ;f ,East Renton Environmental Impact Statement :,. .,o :: , . : . . . :IS9UE9 , . .. . , . . WEST MAPLE WOOD November 1991FinnlN vember 1992 :'''.:;: S:A;: t5[`t3:S correct capacity problems to Would r t orrect a aci roblems o �rWould c c Tenvironment would be affected p #Y he EIS analyzed howthe Solves .'I'<"` ' a"�a`V`�' tY Yby u �x►r.. t. ..1?.. :.�Y :..:, and >`: <� .:,...,:. endratorium in Heather Downs mo rato iu in Bather Downs an d interceptors. The environmen#al end mo r m H building each of the proposed r iu - p p 'rr� r �.ttai''i>��",.7.:1:.:,:,.::,,.,..:„.:::!,,..:,H :atl��..Ic%v+ri�*: .d';<�;� M a lewood Subbasins. i I wood Subbas ns. i rul s of the Washington p Ma e analysis was conducted according to the e State Environmental Poll Act SEPA . The analyses included Policy � � Y - �_public meetings. W I nott connect homesq : « � iin East s t Would not connect homes omes in East s tFow The EIS and Predesign Report Are RelatedAquifer ' ?rir >� Protection ":,.:�: ;�:':FtorI� E>��<. `r>. :� , n. . Ma I wood on septic tanks which are Maplewood on septic tankswhich are contaminatingReiterativeThe Predesign Report and EIS were prepared in an ifiall .. contaminating Rentons drinkin water suppIY• suppIY nton s drinking water processin whichthe results of one affected the other S ec Y tiff intheDraftEIS helped form the environmental impacts identified h l p p i thepreferred alternative in the Predesign the basis for selecting gg cost per connection '" ` st cost er connection Intermediate Hi he ><��oa t:�i�s : ..c. t7 ` e g Report The results of the Predesign Report were then `' e 1714 1838 ERU $936 $ 1088 ERU analyses of the Final EIS. $ r incorporated into the environmentala Y p °x>: i withstate notbe eligible for financing r with Statel v not be eligible ibis fo financing w t I M Mayg Lastlythe results of the Final EIS will be incorporated into the final mi4•04;i. t , ,.:<:u. •K .,: <:,:>. 9 Cost/Financing .:<.>:.::.::. :::;.,..:.. >h>���<.> F Loan. P+NTF Loan. Tru' ���o�. FydVT of the Interceptor. sit=iii ,:.< design for g p O new cost recoveredfrom new 90 92 0 of cost recovered from of o •ccs ': ::vr '-:'ra `r�t3w ~�-< : > 86-87% z�n:<;=:::::. What Happens Next? :O.00 0 tit rt r:.: ;>.,..... ".:i.;.:;:;<<�.;<;>::<;:<'< connections. connections. orf sThe UtilityCommitteeof the CityCouncil Will studythehetwoilre l .. �. t��......r.,....:.. ....:. �.:.� m,. n A�:. :�< `": CP ia rt i uar l b I ai nmseIerymicees#stoGa MdAe bs i" �� oth� i. a :� ` Pa rtia l) implements G M A b Y extending te n d i n g Cityurban services toadesi designated Growthd enxta#eending and recommend a preferred alternative tothe CityCounct. Tsh afnudlUrbanArea bhane Management �c � � ` ut does not provideaCitYCouncilwill also elicit publiccomments at publicmeein f « if�tre: r�a. b,e � .. . : • Urban Area but does not rovidea _' l , „. ;:;;::;:; meConsistency ; tig : : rturotectae ,,,w.,> R fans to protect City's Maplewood select an alternative. After the CityCouncil seleicts aniAqui er. means to protect the City's Maplewood aquifer.itwill direct the City's Environmental Review Committee . . .. to prepare a construction mitigation documentThatdocumentwill identify problems thatmayarise duringthe constructionand [.rier ��s:s,::�e...:.:.:.:.:..,,>. .:. .»;,::g <A ` "' Estabt e#Y`��� ri : g � : Would not serve East Maplewood home Would not serve East Maplewood homes es operation of the sewer interceptor and recommend conditions that ety ... t!mnp . y;;,,,,.;;,;. , ;,; .M ;;,.�,;;;; septictak ,wsiSlope Stabil!' ,>;,;;.,,;.,;.. , ; . , ; , deMa ldeiwochoargGionglf septic tanks,which are discharging will be imposed to mitigate those problems. ytemstothesewerystem wastewater andestabilizng the steep wastewater and destabilizing the steep slo es above slopes above the Maplewood Golf Course.� Course� ioy p 3 • . N.oTICEI. • . RENTON CITY COUNCIL puBL.IC HEARING . ON JANUARY 11, 1993 AT 7:30 P M. RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 200. MILL AVENUE SOUTH SELECTION OF A PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE SITE FOR THE EAST RENTON INTERCEPTOR PROJECT ALL INTERESTED PARTIES ARE INVITED TO ATTEND AND PRESENT WRITTEN AND/OR ORAL COMMENTS. FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, PLEASE CALL 235-2501 . EAST RENTON INTERCEPTOR • SELECTING THE ALIGNMENT ® V` l / LIALTIERN\ATIVES-1E1 �\\� la.. ..v4 ,THREE.iregWLi-Pi .— 5011TH HIGHLANDS -4n tire route is within CiLy.�h EAST MAPLEWOOD- Begins within the aty ana Follows the NE 3rd/ 4th Street corridor until hovels south through unincorporated King connecting to a new METRO Interceptor in County until descending the Cedar River Valley Foctory Avenue North. above the Maplewood Coll Course and / // s u ,� conneclin. to ME TRO'sr Riv r InSr._ •,..1 LJr/ .t.Ai) .r.. Oto III - -�_- .. .. rot _�1I ��' 4 I)9 i la � i � ,iH _ _ i r _ ` 1 '41411 1 • • . I d • I it( 0.Owl LII' -WEST MAPLEWOOD - Begins within the City and . `. _ld � 'wii II J M Il travels south along the NE 3rd/NE 4th Street Z1}21 �' T.:;L1 --�-+ corridor until turning south of Edmonds Avenue ' - �./� I and descending the Cedor Volley to connect to l � - 4 I the METRO Cedar River Interceptor in the Maple c 1 Volley Highway. --.-..-.1' • 7/./_C-1 _. . (_ 1l_-.AN--: Complete legal description &further information available in the City Clerk's Office - 235-2501 The removal, mutilation, destruction Wa or concealment of this notice is a mis- ® demeanor, punishable by fine and imprisonment. • CERTIFICATION • STATE OF WASH-INGTON) ss. COUNTY OF KING ) . . • 1 Jf , i HEREBY CERTIFY THAT oZ? COPIES OF THE ABOVE NOTICE WERE POSTED :Y ME IN THREE OR ORE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED AND TWO COPIES WERE POSTED AT THE RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING, 200 MILL AVENUE S. , RENTON, WA ON DATE OF /„ --,?9,- yZ • • r. SUB':C lliE'D�AND' R' ,4/4. ''19 BE O --- . _ � �= � �;9 Ilk SIGNED 04-7-2----,2e.----41 • Nota`:Public i,�'�s^.�..,f. + e..` : • of '.mhington, _ reel i irg. : , �..`�. Y Mk iiiis r ._- O. , r • 'r PUBLIC HEARING January 11, 1993 Notice of Public Hearing concerning the Selection of a Preferred Alternative Site for the East Renton Interceptor Project. Locations of postings done on , 1992. 1. 1/C otv-'PL- t Gly!i on ea, di 2. JjOO5C557: 3. SE g s j + i/e.t,z+aoi w 5E 4. f..{r,i bn a t' NE 1- vm /UE 5. iso 0 14/7/011 . 6. ,tf'rr „20.72,4- R,1/4,ll at/ Jv� 7. /3e)y 6e /oft- . 8. 3q.,2(10 Av& /2P" 9. Mari if-DC av A/C V- ,Vg 10. K;Rk L ha( avA)e IP J 11. Pate/6n?On a o) 2 _ �- ,vim /& 12. .'4b .de �v Ove d- NE /to. 27 13. �d� /v 3 ST 14. 3utk,UE7% av/Vi N- SSI 15. LK uJ^-6l • rivet. ' 3(,,•• sr 41. 16.-P40 LW /1/ ."1-- /V (o 17. 3/y P,4Qa av N . 18. /OM Ai /I' 5/ 19.l Ay l oft a,V r►.w. ¢ o�a N W 20. Lel#71$four ielv s LJ h1a 2 4 e_ av 5 4J 21. 5rn; 7't ai/ 5 -4' S -22. G+ ' - . + Tau 5 - 23. 7/ 7 3 . 15'4 Sr, 24. .5 nSr l � boff" s 25. !alba" RD' S • I- 3 / 777 26. / DO(o 5 . �3rd . .27. }`�.Z) nD,,ol S .4v. 5 C ± 5 E 11°1)i 5 / a2 U• '1'?a, sr . 5 CITY OF RENTON NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON CITY COUNCIL NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Renton City Council will hold a public hearing at 7:30 p.m. on January 11, 1993, to consider selection of a preferred alternative site for the East Renton Interceptor Project. The hearing will be held in the second floor Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue S., Renton WA 98055. Written protests may be filed with the City Clerk at or prior to the time fixed for the hearing. Persons may otherwise appear and present their opinions orally; however, all protests must be submitted in writing. All interested parties are invited to attend. For additional information, please call 235-2501. �.� Marilyn J. ' rsen City Clerk Date of Publication: December 31, 1992 Valley Daily News Deccfiber 21. 1992 Renton City Council Minute Page 586 Citizen Comment: William Knedler, 579 Kirkland Avenue NE, Renton 98056, stated he is Knedler - Residential against allowing public parking on the east side of Kirkland Avenue. His Parking Problems residence is opposite the Renton Technical College where there is a breach in the fence. He felt that if any public parking was permitted on Kirkland Avenue and the adjacent side streets, students would park there because of the proximity to the classroom area. Councilman Edwards asked if residents would agree to allowing parking on only the east side of Kirkland Avenue if the fence were closed. Mr. Knedler stated the residents oppose any public parking in this area. Council President Keolker-Wheeler questioned if the school had been contacted concerning the parking problems. Mr. Knedler indicated he had not called the school, and stated that the fence was originally required in the environmental impact statement. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL REFER MS. JETT'S LETTER AND THIS SUBJECT TO THE TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE AND ADMINISTRATION TO DETERMINE IF A VIOLATION EXISTS. CARRIED. Councilman Stredicke clarified that the Administration should review this issue to determine if there has been a violation of the Hearing Examiner's condition. The Transportation Committee should review the parking conditions surrounding the school. Citizen Comment: Lusher Bill Lusher, 14636 SE 140th Place, Renton, expressed his concern over - East Renton Interceptor the East Renton Interceptor project. He requested notification of any future meetings and correspondence. Citizen Comment Ray LaBlanc, 11621 SE 47th Place, Bellevue 98006, requested LaBlanc - East Renton advancement to agenda item 9.e. - Utilities Committee Report, East Interceptor Renton Interceptor. MOVED BY TANNER, SECONDED BY EDWARDS, COUNCIL SUSPEND THE REGULAR ORDER OF BUSINESS AND ADVANCE TO OLD BUSINESS, UTILITIES COMMITTEE REPORT - EAST RENTON INTERCEPTOR. CARRIED. Utilities Committee Referred 12/7/92 - Utilities Committee Chairman Tanner presented a Public Works: East report recommending that staff make a presentation to Council on its Renton Interceptor recommendation for a preferred alternative for the East Renton Interceptor project. The Committee further recommended that a public hearing be held immediately following the presentation. The Committee recommended that the presentation and public hearing be set as part of the Council meeting of January 11, 1993. Following the public hearing, the project will be returned to Committee for final consideration prior to presentation to Council for approval. MOVED BY TANNER, SECONDED BY EDWARDS, COUNCIL ADOPT THE COMMITTEE REPORT AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. Citizen Comment: Randall Jacqueline Randall, 14603 SE 140th, Renton 98059, expressed opposition - East Renton Interceptor to the East Renton Interceptor project. L ece:reber 21. 1992 Renton City Council Minutes Page 587 Citizen Comment: Ray LaBlanc, 11621 SE 47th Place, Bellevue 98006, stated that he is in LaBlanc - East Renton favor of the East Renton Interceptor project. Interceptor Recess MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL RECESS FOR FIVE MINUTES. CARRIED. Time 8:55 p.m. The Council meeting reconvened at 9:00 p.m.; roll was called; all members were present. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. Court Case: CRT-92-015, Court case filed by Christopher P. Clifford, applying for Writ of Review, Clifford, Boeing requesting complete transcripts of all proceedings regarding the Site Plan Customer Service Approval (File No. SA; SM-92-006) for the Boeing Customer Service Training Center (SA; SM- Training Center. Refer to City Attorney. 92-006) LAG: 63-720, Renovation Transportation Division recommended that Council approve Supplement 4 Project to FAA Lease DTFA 11-81-L-00122 (LAG-63-720, Add 10-92), which increases the reimbursement amount by $1,000 for the renovation of the FAA-leased kitchen and restroom areas in the Control Tower building; and authorize the Mayor and city clerk to execute the supplement. Council concur. Growth Management: Planning/Technical Services Division requested adoption of a resolution Comprehensive Plan, amending Resolution 2878 that will extend the time period to March 31, Resolution 2878 1993, for adoption of the interim land use element under the Comprehensive Plan and area-wide zoning process. Council concur. (See later action.) MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. INFORMATION ITEM City Clerk submits 1992 official population for City of Renton; 43,090 as Planning: City of Renton calculated by State Office of Financial Management. 1992 Revised Census CORRESPONDENCE Correspondence was read from David Halinen, Halinen & Vander Wel, Citizen Comment: P.S., Bellevue Place/MGM Building, 800 Bellevue Way NE, Suite 376, Halinen - Bellevue 98004, requesting that a "special study" date later than December Comprehensive Plan 14 be established for the Monterey Terrace property, McMahon property, and environs, as part of the Final Environmental Impact Study under the Comprehensive Plan. Citizen Comment: Piha - Correspondence was read from Stanley V. Piha, 2101 Fourth Avenue, Comprehensive Plan Suite 250, Fourth & Blanchard Building, Seattle 98121-2317, on behalf of Drs. Laband and Miller, requesting zoning designation changes in the Comprehensive Plan for property located at the northwest corner of South 5th Street and Williams Avenue South. December 21. 1992 Renton City Council Minutes Page 583 • Mr. Warren advised that the Council will retain the right to close the thoroughfare if necessary. Audience comment was invited. Since there was no audience comment, it was MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY EDWARDS, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL ADOPT THE LID 329 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL IN THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF $1,654,063.15. CARRIED. AUDIENCE COMMENT Kathleen Jett, 583 Kirkland Avenue NE, Renton 98056, submitted a Citizen Comment Jett letter and petitions containing 68 signatures of residents living on - Residential Parking Kirkland Avenue NE between NE Fifth and NE Seventh. The residents Problems have requested City assistance in: encouraging Renton Technical College to close the fence located on the west side of the campus which violates the Hearing Examiner's decision of 1/24/86; urging Renton Technical College to create adequate on-campus parking; eliminating public parking in the neighborhood; and replacing the "No Parking" signs that were removed on 12/7/92. Upon Council inquiry, Ms. Jett noted that the residents oppose all parking on Kirkland Avenue NE and that closing the school fence and allowing parking on only the east side of Kirkland Avenue is not acceptable. Citizen Comment Daniel Potoshnik, 13405 - 142 Avenue SE, Renton 98059, expressed Potoshnik - East Renton , concern over the proposed route of the East Renton Interceptor through Interceptor King County since the majority of costs associated with the proposed route would be borne by county residents. Mr. Potoshnik preferred the West Maplewood route which provides a straighter and more efficient route to Maple Valley Highway. He requested notification of any future meetings to discuss this issue. Citizen Comment: Griffin ay Griffin, 14306 - 144 Avenue SE, Renton 98059, requested - East-Renton dvancement to old business, item 9.d., King County Fire District #25 Interceptor request to contract fire and emergency medical services. He felt that C esidents in the affected area have not been properly informed of the ctions occurring with King County Fire District #25. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY EDWARDS, COUNCIL SUSPEND THE REGULAR ORDER OF BUSINESS AND ADVANCE TO OLD BUSINESS, PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Public Safety Committee Referred 8/17/92 - Public Safety Committee Vice Chairwoman Mathews Fire: King County Fire presented a report recommending concurrence with the Fire Department's District #25 proposal to contract for fire and emergency medical services with King County Fire District #25 (KCFD). This action is in response to a request from KCFD for a contract to provide fire and emergency medical services. This action has also been confirmed by a resolution adopted by King County Fire District #25 on December 15, 1992. The Committee has reviewed the proposal and determined there will be no adverse impact to the City's fire service and the contract would place no added financial burden on the City. 141) December 7, 1992 Renton City Council Minutes Page 558 Separate Consideration Administrative Services Department requested adoption of a resolution to Item 6.d: establish a community development block grant fund interfund loan. Finance: Community Refer to Finance Committee. Development Block Grant, Interfund Loan In response to Council inquiry, City Attorney Warren stated that funding for this project is generated from the general fund and does not include interest. Executive Assistant Covington further noted that in the past, block grant projects have been funded by general fund monies, offfering interest-free loans until the City receives reimbursement. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY EDWARDS, REFER THIS MATTER TO THE FINANCE COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Item 6.g: City Clerk submitted letter from Richard Gilroy, Northward Construction Public Works: Co., requesting revision to the sewermoratorium exemption granted to Northward/Orchards ,the Orchards development in 1990 to authorize enlargement of sanitary Sewer Moratorium sewer pipe. Refer to Utilities Committee. Exemption (UC-90-008) Upon Council inquiry, Engineering Specialist Dave Christensen stated that the original moratorium resolution allowed exemption to a number of projects. The Orchards development was one of the projects, and they have received exemption from a system that includes a pumping station and temporary bypass flow. Northward Construction Co., developer of the Orchards, intends to phase the development and rather than put in an interim system, they will connect to the existing system, upsize a few segments of the sewer line, and thus be able to provide the necessary capacity. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY EDWARDS, REFER THIS MATTER TO THE UTILITIES COMMITTEE. CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE Correspondence was read from David Osaki, Land Planner/Growth Citizen Comment Osaki, Management, Puget Power, and Phillip E. Gladfelter, Corporate Real Comprehensive Plan Property Manager, PACCAR, P. O. Box 1518, Bellevue WA 98009, concerning the Comprehensive Plan. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY TANNER, REFER CORRESPONDENCE TO THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE. CARRIED. Citizen Comment Letter was read from Daniel Potoshnik, 13405 - 142nd Ave. S.E., Renton Potoshnik - East Renton 98059, concerning proposed location of the East Renton Interceptor. Mr. Interceptor Potoshnik proposed running the interceptor through the City of Renton and not through the unincorporated King County area. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY TANNER, REFER CORRESPONDENCE TO THE UTILITIES COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Citizen Comment Carson Correspondence was read from Frank and Nancy Carson, 1737 Lake Ave. - Comprehensive Plan So., Renton 98055, expressing concern about the declaration of wetlands for approximately 10,000 square feet of their property located along SR- 167, claiming wetland was caused by construction of the highway. f' : I. , 6� , ,y... .. ,..... .tom.. :7"1.,,-";:-; ..,..r._; - r ..... - .. y, , • .: ..: I :. ' i n. t _tie , L�� , DE 01 1992 .i.--- RECEIVE CITY;CLERK'S'OFEICE; . -.1,,,, ' l , t < • • : VWV t 410 11) CLit _V 3,4 'LI b.)-11xtv71 rk.J\ i»viitr cvvv_ (el4eAcJiAr.b1 --±rA4ytik 1(n- cd - 04c 0?-• tdzf-e6-ei 6-61JeLfu cyy-earuvlo. a.._01J(Ak_ A,4 (364z)n)_9_ y(i; p Wt& T- a -_+h4 JA-114 , n CA, Thk) NAA\;tAr.a0AJk i4 C(7% \?)- LOk \Cti C6-11 6•104L.O_L ?1 .e'vq\C*1\‘"4 fr uyt-t,LU P. 70' ckx4 orA„ ,AL„, ,yee/Jr. c4A„51, 0-akwb:ELL,Anai -4-694ivv 41. cur-i c_16-,s24-k) Lo-6-(vv svur\i-ut kbh,AÔQiA,_,citi4 1tL & 3tk)LAA s4./44- m, 0)ec.ALL.Q.,_ N.z2_,Vakt.6 uvQ 6 t `:/titk.is it A, 1-k__ a61.k.d1) ____6ykka J. kAi -ark) *it-it-IA:11\1Z MJLCULazt C-6 \tjfitd:6457( C51- PALL& 61SA bLQ/LW_ C2)V -4-W"% ajLt- (1 . Nkatid mr‘Q, t),)-161)4 liJitaQ) --taz iug kieyitiw.4 cl-bo-4 -#7/‘Q po1-6-301,4 ()LA/1;dt (612a51-1/), • ' ILLTS2 CL3)AgieLA Vgly, -ukt6,4--LW 0-P4 c3C. .5,41C EStagitAiike otAica SAL4-ek4:6-/U1 g-64ZA: ( -;W eic1011(iL4 CL pe4. 2,,, ,t4 Cat geSIOLtti) 9 a, kPhr5t.ra 8i36C0 - LUZ()C" 9 Zi;) 11-1 2f.:(0, Pkt , December 7. 1992 Renton City Council Minutes Page 557 Public Works: Consultant Transportation Systems Division requested one-year extension to annual Contracts, Transportation consultant contracts to: David Kline (CAG-91-004), Kittelson & Systems Associates (CAG-90-106), and TP&E (CAG-90-108) for transportation planning services; ABKJ (CAG-90-090) and Tudor (CAG-90-077) for structure design; Alpha Engineering (CAG-90-091) and Lochner (CAG- 90-085) for structure inspection; Alpha Engineering (CAG-90-087), Entranco (CAG-90-089), Gardner (CAG-90-088), and Tudor (CAG-90- 078) for street design; Lochner (CAG-90-085), TP&E (CAG-90-086), Tudor (CAG-90-076) for lighting/signal design. Refer to Transportation Committee. Utilities: East Renton Utility Systems Division recommended selection of a preferred alternative Interceptor, Alternative for the East Renton Interceptor. Refer to Utilities Committee. Public Works: Lk. Utility Systems Division recommended Council approval to authorize the Washington Pollution Mayor and city clerk to execute the Lake Washington Pollution Abatement, Herrera Abatement Project contract agreement with Herrera Environmental Environmental Consultants. Refer to Utilities Committee. Consultants Contract CAG: 88-011, Maplewood Water Utility Division recommended that Council authorize the Mayor Wells 10 and 12, RH2 and city clerk to execute Addendum No. 4 to CAG-88-011 (Maplewood Engineering Wells 10 and 12) with RH2 Engineering in the amount of $93,691. Refer to Utilities Committee. CAG: 88-011, Maplewood Water Utility Division recommended that Council authorize the Mayor Wells 10 and 12, RH2 and city clerk to execute Addendum No. 5 to CAG-88-011 (Maplewood Engineering Supply Project - Water Rights Compliance) in the amount of $289,270 ($149,910 in 1993; $98,280 in 1994; $41,080 in 1995) with RH2 Engineering. Refer to Utilities Committee. Public Works: Water Main Water Utility Division recommended contract award for the 24-inch water Relocation, Gary Merlino main relocation at Carco Road and Houser Way to Gary Merlino Construction Construction in the amount of $11,766.75 and authorize the Mayor and city clerk to execute the contract documents. Refer to Utilities Committee. Public Works: Well 5A Water. Utility Division recommended that Council award contract for Well Selective Pumping Tests, 5A Selective Pumping Tests to Holt Testing Inc. in the amount of $14,607 Holt Testing Inc. and authorize the Mayor and city clerk to execute the contract documents. Refer to Utilities Committee. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY EDWARDS, COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS AMENDED. CARRIED. CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI #: len Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works For Agenda of: Dept/Div/Board.. Utility Systems Division/Wastewater December 7, 1992 Staff Contact David M. Christensen (x-6212) Agenda Status •• Consent X Subject: Public Hearing... East Renton Interceptor Correspondence.. Selection of Preferred Alternative Ordinance Resolution Old Business Exhibits: New Business None Study Sessions Information Recommended Action: Approvals: Refer to Utilities Committee Legal Dept N/A December 17, 1992 Finance Dept N/A Other • Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... -0- Transfer/Amendment Amount Budgeted -0- Revenue Generated Summary of Action: • With the publishing of the Final Environmental Impact Statement on November 20, 1992 and the completion of the Pre-design Report, the next course of action necessary is the selection of a preferred alternative thereby allowing staff to prepare its mitigation document, then proceed with permitting and final design. Staff would like to make a presentation to the Utilities Committee on December 17, 1992, and if concurrence is reached, this presentation could be made to full Council on December 21, •1992. Prior to the Utilities Committee meeting,-an information package will be submitted to all members of Council. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is the recommendation of staff that the selection of a preferred alternative for the East Renton Interceptor be referred to the Utilities Committee for presentation on December 17, 1992. 92-693/DMc/bh EAST RENTON INTERCEPTOR PARTIES OF INTEREST (Council Meeting of 12/7/92) Daniel Potoshnik Cynthia and Norman Green 13405 142nd Avenue SE 14128 SE 132nd Street Renton, WA 98059 Renton, WA 98059 Mr. and Mrs. Bruce S. Osgoodby Mike and Shirley Coughlin 13456 - 156th Avenue Se 14126 SE 135th Street Renton, WA 98059 Renton, WA 98059 Donald Hamblin Everett Wilcock 13025 138th Avenue SE 11830 164th Avenue SE Renton, WA 98059 . Renton, WA 98059 J. A. Taylor Joe Rietti 13319 142nd Avenue SE 13635 SE 135th Renton, WA 98059 Renton, WA 98059 K. L. Waddell David Bricklin 13307 142nd Avenue SE Suite 1015 Fourth and Pike Building Renton, WA 98059 1424 Fourth Avenue Seattle, WA 98101 P. Koler 13217 142nd Avenue SE Ray Griffin Renton, WA 98059 14306 144th Avenue SE Renton, WA 98059 • Laurie and Rich Lytle 13205 142nd Avenue SE Paul Lindberg Renton, WA 98059 13836 SE 131st Renton, WA 98056 cc: Gregg Zimmerman David Christiansen I,' " ,"'..,> %.: j4266//-77 ' '7....I...I?'" tal '5' 1 ci edz-eat iez //t-,'---- ,.'f-, . . 11 1,, ci, ' ii T/k4- mt---tA/4-1AA .., — — AA il • 1 II-44,42_ - d ç -t d 77A \ .�`-- , LosL (E.,,i p_i,„4.,T,T,A, gi,,,,\,,- -,.) -rk,O,, i\ i(-; „,. ci„„..i.„ - "T.' &ci (\ A ' I (.:( . jia__ aLI 4 D .A(-) C"`(\) tOZ 'Th. , I Qii QA*--11.. � ) , !h-T—xv,t)- 1, 51,2,c).;42.A..0 UA.Q.., ,--\ t1/4-Ao idte-. ( Av...cil_,- C . . L.:a/4:W.N 4111p.- U2i -E4c-- ,-1)2. , v3LE.cs- Iht'',)-;4 s'E-- <A2A:- --,,) , ,__I ,2 C ...„--w , .267,, , ...6.-e. y3,3.pi -AZ � & Z:t7L `r :5Z !,7� / z .(eiL /336-7 / /z"2r(26,e, -1Z, r- -k-.� Tc6 3? � �.,Ce.LLG- L> f rC1 '(_ 2 - i,41-ee/Le- ', . " ---/ /V6/15---/zi;t-7/Ae.i. i/ -,-)_-_/-07-7 c/,?Di-5z-7 ;. •, . C., . A /-3,z,os /9 Z_-'Ll a- A VA- X Z.: re-E:4176-11 1:?i'C)-r; r v• rk1� . i//'-? ,56-r/3 24 64 &/27 ) ryas-24 .,_,,,i,./1,,,,,,__,/ _5-e. /5- 2-13.7.-- ?,-,..,:61-3--z. 7,F0,5- ‘ r1 1-0.16 S 3) kc-� l � L 0<,_, _, i LL Zv....... r L fes/ f-�li.' .'.j L / 3i liL 3 t^. e d7c;� s�'3S J 0 /ijlee4//14-04-0-- .. of � I . FLe4".'e'=- ' Ql- - ,--If.\-ie,- - _ , ,_.,........_ Oti f)v ----)__ __,_ li- A_ .__ _ ...FormAsL) __ ,i7 • crjje.).A i i _ . :Nis,. _ - P1-2,-;_ae,F1e-:---. 1.vC-4-Q-A. (7_ . :,, _u-____ _ __ _ _ _ _ . _ U _. _ _ -_ _ .. ' • ,- Fr,- 4 • ( ' k • •"'"'"'"?..'74,75.1Z. i.•-•••, ,-,-. '''',4,p'''''!‘.,."..r''.4•7.1.,:‘,247,4:" W-''''1,W; '' reor-1:,...;-'..,...n.1,7: -.7T-1--,:i,---.17—m4yr3:4,-,5,-.7v-Mix92-tw4L. ,,:....,,,,,--„,, --if,..--,5n7i) •-, -,,,, - -it. , -e,,,,, - --, ," --: ,-,.,...,.., .IT,'•; ,':•,-...,..I...4.."..:''ac'","11,-1.66. --.-!:1 jc... 0.,'-i,. >--,-'..--- r----,47.ik,Ltri,774,'..v,:,, 4'44- 7-4,-,-: -,,:-. ,-;:--7-' ' :,""-,-. -4''-1,,,,,,,;-F,zi-',:-.; ,-.-•,-..le.twk-,-,p-..0-,,, -,--it- li A-.1-.- ,„-..,-.,-,, ,-,,,,,,-•,F,--:-.4..,,k,,,, .-1.ii,..., .;`..4.,,4 i, .,,i,;;'4!-!:.t... Li f:-...-..-.Iv.;v,-?..,. .i.....=; ,...;.‘4;;e•-,1•0 ;k4;',7t,...*.:7,'"`."--!!•1*„'',C,(4;efilAi','---:',•:,..4 •;--;teK'''"-'.4%•, • .---`;;;;:-., f--''.;4,''.d..4,:_-_,,T,;.---, ,,-',--_'."4.f,•-.:,;:g4aK.i,,,[`..4 ,t°41ifit..777:t''i• •-:-.1 )t;-:'4.:'i:'-'`ii•r47t,''.,,i ' • $.:4,.:4'.•Lt.',-.'::1-7'•!='-;:.1". • -.-t-•?:' ,..i4:-••' .,.-',';.! ...`;A:l .:-.,.ig?.,?.:,:-.1...,,`•F"•1,••,•0t7-_;';;'l0ii..,":.,.:.N5f",t.,'4:i:t,A,!;.•.',46ii-;.',t' *',„:,-.'`,. 4'n „.1•r1;::*4,.-_,:?7:.,:..•-"-•4:•;t1.•..4.:.:'„Q-v';_<:.,.:-,7-„.•,:,tttn;.,,•,.,,,,5v., .,1...,,},A..,,S1 1.,::,,.,1-... „7„,,,...,,..i-4,,,„ _.-..: -_,..,z,,,, ,..x:c.:,,,-,;:.",,:-„,., ...,,,,,-,,,,.,,,oi,-..,: ,.•;‘„:.: •,,,,.:,,,-.-4,,..:4' :'..- ''''''464 i':1-:?.::•' '''..s,;?1,C.:..:1':',;.,,,-:'., '14 ,,,,,,..„?.,O..!..,..,i '''' ..;5 ; :.''',.; .=',,,,,, ,' : A P,„Ar„.7,:.;:,1„,-%-/-ri--..„,-.---,,--24%7,--•",,,-„-,11 -4,-,,,,,&..:; :*,-' 144`k- '----,i,!.#-"$.'-*-- -.-44 ,.- .., ....`...,1; 1,?--,t:-.-",'!‘!-::, •'.:-.k,.,"---,,,-1,---'7-, _....,-,...-1.--i,z.„,',..-1,„,-,,,;:„1--,'".-,-1:•2.=r2 l::,!-,?;,-'4,,,-.'',,,'‘f•!`,,-it-0•41.,-g- ..:*,:+3''.",:.!:•0`44k,'•••'''''':1-'-°"*.--;.,•;- • --.'341"‘ .--.:.' et.,,,,14.4,.',•:::;•-..-.-',.•.-";.N fr--11":"' •••'.1.,`'.-V-.;,,, I-;•-#VY'''" 2";•'•ZiP.• ssler'lit:J5-- 1-1-,i4.!ii--:=••",:•:4--,,,,Nfkrffti.`,,:_ATAA-2t:ge,ZE,4A,"Or::,..-1,••.'t•.."4-te.-•_,,,,,-,%..-.: -,,;,..,' _-•!'!!,, 12,:-..--;:..1,4ci-',l•TA"(2'''''',/^/44M'Z'''-'7fA;11, ,,<ViA' '...":;'4it:''3.1...VsliLai.e-t*";;.:1;":.;st,T,',,,,;,,,:• ;,,,,iif-;.,4.4''',eit:W."4;"....^,A9,Cr,f4.47-,.,,,,,7€1r. '''•"3.",.41,r,,f4f.:4:X.: ',!,..1:: -1' ,,.',..,•iti,„...,,,,,,,,,,Aiy,c...,-04,,....://..,,41,,,,;,,,,r4e..c:„--;.-i•4i.,;:!-,19*- ,-- -1:-.1.:,A";;;;„,i,',tilv.-:-, ,,;,'...t•gi:•• e....;•-•alt.t.,4.-f.tl,. .,,...--•-\i_...,#.-f.;;•":•"•frO4*',_, „ :?c',..1..,litz:f.--•••;.-- •,:.,,..r.,, .11itloi ., ,,r-i,-c,„....,•;,-,ti.,...,-..,,,,,...t. t4.f.,:?•;,,,•,,4-f.,..,,,,,,•-„,,,jr. ..-st•'....,,,,A:.,-__...-2;','••••••..,-",-'•,'"•-•, '.; :•;433•.;''1:4'.;.: ;',.,*1:4-.':1''''' .•6'' ''.,;ft'''''':!.414.::'ii...c"i,;:,•;t.;:i;7J•§‘--t1.:ti;!::,',,;S.**1:4,., ,i'•'°).-7.4•'-,14:1.4' e'''r;•4;"4 T:';',.../,',14;y7,,,,d.S-7. ;,',-.'.,'-'.-"•.:',.:.:' 1!•,,',!...:;",.1'..iir;Ct1R,?/').41'.7..:,-;-."••C.,:;•-,a,2$. ;---';'1•:. ••i''''••t,',.`?:7!.?. .5:4'.;;:=1":.•4.•,?*'4'.'". .0.31,'k-,•;e' ,,,L'''.`;''. .:-...ti ,,,,t--.:-.,t,' '..,;,„--;.',.•"-, t,,, ,i-!-;1 ,",-..r;-*--•••.-••(,a,.,,,s.,'-_,,;.;.-.1`'i..Y.,'.:":•-.,Z;;';•','4',•a-' • 5‘71r.4.....pie.:114.7.4. -kr-Aida•••--?;.',-:",' -4-5-1--,,,,'';',:h,-77..,,',.;i'r.- -Sp.,--‘...-,'..•"4'-' v,-Ity,:ve..,:',. I ..';-:''',';?1,:',.-3.;'•'-':;':,---Tli:',..?.C..,;•'',.'-'4,'-.',1_,•-•'T./ '-,,';‘,.' ,--="' ' ...7.'""f- ';.7, '' -.-'::.;2 '.'-',,,.;;,-i.:.-----.413...-4:,,:..-'-'--.!.t.,;:,e.„t;,!?,:r.,..ii:t'-',;.Y7-!,;__k.:,$4,...,l''f'.; _x,,,,,'41;ti'iit." ..,:i•••`,I ..;-,..--,,,,•.%:.-;:'.,..---,-.-. .,„. ----,,.-..,,,, -,'-ll,. .,',e'-'''.. -''''''''•.7:VI"--''.'1:':141•'''''''''...n4;',E.:*::'-,',.'‘:1•21'':‘,;".;.'":‘,1:','",-;',.",'.1:',,,Z,,?:a.-c.r..r.i',ie.:''''''''',V44e:7'''''';',!''''''''''''',.,‘,:.'Z'4.4 ,--,';''kr-f,7,41'0":: 3,S-4,-...,. ,-,.'..,. ::,,,,....".../'i':'":',1'4015)':',:•:-•"••;,,,,;,-,,,f-744-47.........4-•:.z..,•••,. !.:•-....:•,•?-t.i.-..-:•;....^....t.,---...2.4ti....3- -<.r.P,',,,..f.,,..,-,fs-806".,,,,Or,,-...•-,,t„ .,•-,-;- k-,',4'AV.--.i.ykl-;-•1;•go:--:.'i---f•Oi• Ir=:;•<:','-46.4:3!-::' sT,e,•;:>1`iru-,;•1-,.••-t:'-i-.A.tti'ft_;::Z=i?- '-',/.0.4-.1 rt-,-,..kkk-,q%4, „ -At.g--1, -..1.•••,i-: ''''''';'.''''-'r'2''';'5'''::14r#rl'••''''';''"'' 1 '1;3'. ' ''''''''•• '4"*t''''''''''-. ,-'-'.:C.2.4.±14.74--,-f-..',:',:,4•1":,',:7::--•'::,-CP:',:14:'-.-.41i.,;,-- :.,',,,,Z:;,!-,•1 _i:4 ,-,ri,-V.,74, ,'":4!,-2.--rft,.::.-,. - i;.?;,•'.;,i.F:, -.7',7.,„,....,,---,.....I..,-':.!. •"--..'''';';'.--.. ...!l`r.:•--;:;:ti ,:,,i'..,4iil."•-•1 •16i2'clfc-'",-;:-'`",i`.;:::;,',:::',..;:',-'-z,,,.:-"A'-'.;f;:"';,-:;':',-.;N,:','„5=''A'4":•;1.-.:V1f4T4'.44,4:-tc..--v'-;:l...-'':;*:' „„*-_,-,--,-_,:•:,,,,--..7-4":k9)--:-;:?;!:s',,: •_:,••ek-,,_-,1•-,-::_,,y:sy..;:2,4:,,-;„:.-;.,:z,:T,„7--,, „,A:,-::),,'.'_-,{1:-.,,V i..:-..t,'-4,‘-',....:4 •••,--,/ . ,,...... •.- •. .,.i.,:-..,•••_.,-,--7_ ,... .., -.-416-7.,,,§sv.,-,../.. ,,,,--6.1...., ,. .-;-75.,,,t-,./r/c;?,.,47e-,.,:f-If‘t5-_-..,,'-_•,,i,,T:.,--_:-:.;,-;, ,t,:,.-_,..?4:6:.5..,,,i,-;A.,7::'3,.,,,.,,,,z,7;.•1,,-,,,,tt-:,;1 ;:,4 , _.,,,,-,, , , 1,-6-",,00 i/7.-: </i5;',r:'..j).1.-,13-t-..',:',-.V.7'!-I4''g4 :.. !- -ii..-.-i,,,,,7___....lt17,0-:,- 4,7',;&,.,',-‘4,,y, i-:"•-„,•;,,_:,,'..-,C,,•5-4,_ ....<•'-':::'•''.:,:,,-.-..y.,--:.',,-1-,,,,,Pl-k-7_v.'•-•;-'-c._•'44..--,'-'1;:7-':`-;:?• 301- '••1;f!;'-,:-•cX;";'-;;Thf-'P•Jni- ,'?4::::":'''':'z45 r:-:37' 1At;'.:;17-"?.f- , .,_„,,,,_„,r,.,.„,-.,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,.'44, s!:%.,..,,,:1';',":-,c,A".-.,'.;,5t*‘-t.'t('-.`-'''',:'' '.".,'-'7t"'''.!".11''...`f''.:.f.;-41:-'',,'-'-',..;'-'::''''.21..-7.--';'..::tj,'-'.','-'''.7•'-,q,‘-a".".;:‘7.,V;',70""....*', ..it'77.1 i . (.3.Z:c'-''',;',:',.'..,-,-'...c.;7,':',-..',.-",,`7,:',.'.„..."..'7,'.',.,:-"..,,,"..-.';-2',:,.''. .7,7'.1,',It.'—',":2''L.',.',..7.4.-''',3-': ..','",''.-,:,,.:;.7:,:-,.1-.;'!.: '7..J ,".„,;.';',•V'',,'..;,;•. ,::.:.'"--,:,'",:,,f,','Y''',....,2,';'.-.':;.'f:.:22!'"A:,-,::,',;ii',,L51_,"''''.'';'1 :::..,:',-,.. ..-';'1"3.::::T7Y'.,1',..`,-,''''.??::':::;-::::.'71.--:,'..-::'...C,'!_-",...::':(.:',..tt:,..i'!''::::',7,'72.(g::,,•jr6",.21-:.:,, -,..::i..::, .7,1',.: ::.,,.. ',.ff:...-,,:::,..",r .'2:,,'','..":".,,,:;,:r!':::L.i..,i;:':.,",';'.7.$:*,`,Y,',-i.,-,',,V,y1A-1-7.2f75',.._,4. fi•-i-.;‘,.-•-,.•--,,;,,,'•,•:•-;•-.-;.-,--•:i,,.,F-:'ii-;,--;k.-.1.*,7;',-.--•;:•,.-.•-..-;:•.•;':3,'::,:A,..'',,,,..-J•Z,„.....!:.;.'.'..:.- -,-...1.• ::::-,,,,-,:•-•••:'•:•"-',...'::.,,,•.;;•-c,".:;-T-.....•!"..;',":-E.;',":, ::;',7'...-.:f.gf.:',:i:.-;-.1''•:-- -'.&.!,'•';:0Iiiiirt7X`-,' „:.:1‘;'•,": ..;.,:A7.:•'....iis•r'--•';:-',..s..-1::'.'. ...,'''.'',.r.,••,%1':,f•:.. .c','"•':-i:-.',, ‘:."• 1';:•,..',•i'-..:;''';W:":',-".F:',-..,:.'.•, :ii;.?:-;'.'.;;..;'.:t.;;;:gf:: :-..i.:::;',' ••.:-:'::::;•?!•':•'-':,;rL,',?,'Ii:•.:„.%•;.:,;.,•-••',..1!=i-..:-:‘.: ,-'11,:::.••1141:Q.',<fOihtli...1,-ii*.twIcl•*• ••,.,P, 't •-•,''''...r,!-.!',•••;',: .."•--ri.;;;I:';'.'-•::"•':;-.'','-'::::;.';i1.1 ::..i‘F-1- ..":•: .•';''41.:--.;4: ::'''''-:7;.''!,.\-.2:.•••%;:i..;-':2.•(;•.'''••::: : ::.;iTi.n'll ::',':-;- :;(2 .•• •••••''-'1.: ,, ::‘;''' '' ''•:`:::;;'-:,•7L''4,;---:'V..i,"`1;.7--fY,I..044:--litii:.;e {':•:-:-•.:-..':?:.,:;-',;f:.,-,:-i-P.':`.:7:::'...-i;.'`,.:`.--,7'.','-3•7,-;- . ..-:-:: ','.r,` ,.:-A-',,',":::::-:-.',',.:-'-::,'-':k.:-:::',:::::::',,'-''..':',..'-'-::..".•::i-','.':.-- --,;•-•;',:•.,-,•,,,.',',5,;;.:J....-.-'.;,,,';;;:i.:,._; .44%-.:-. . ..;'a&':',IV`.S;k4,441.41i,f411 ,,-.2t•--•-Y,t•;-:'-',-.:',','-'3-7i'-'---.'1'''-`--,.',-'.v.*--- --.•.:-.:=•,•;'•'".,.•;C:;-;•: •-.7-•-'•:;•.•:,;',...--•'..:-..-,...,e-',:',,::-.`,.-•,,•,..'z';.;;,`....,,..'-',.".="-'-:,;':•:".;-;',-::.•,.•-.4-),."...,":1-,---,,:"."•::::4');:_laq',?p, '',...i.:.TV-i „, msg',1.--vm..-,4-,t) '``.:'•';!•7:':'..1'.:?.... .. ''..,..i'''' ,•-..;,.".''..:',J,'" ,..-,3;.`,..;-.,":::' -- '•&.5-.Vi',;:• •:::;,:•',....:,%'•::::.::::"..:',. ...Y.: .•".,L: `..;1,..:':!,',.Y.,',...':,-.--.c._,,,,,•••,.-.,:.,:.-/,.., ,•'Q':,2.-;"... .. rfif !.-'..,•.:?;, .,;;::-.•fa.::';') •,'";••‘,4;1 -,`,Y• V::•1 ... •... -. . .• --. ___.......... .. . .,... . _ .;:,..•::•••;,cF.:;.-..:...',1'•-•. .::- .::,•!.":•'•-4-a..,f1".:--'•''-'-'''•"•'-'-• •-:''''''''..:•"•-' ' •'•-''•""":'''..:.;["- -:2-•:.1:- ' --'-''--•--:-: -:-.- -- -- --- - - ,;.,. :,•:•:.t.'2 i; . ., yiri.7.f.i.1 11,'; ' 0,;,:i,..r.A.,:,,, „..,,...,;.,...,,, Ni d i , i.--,..-;," ....11.C. , '' ,-- P .--' , ,.:).L.A.---4 -;i , i,,,-„,-, •-•••:c:- i - r.--, ,r'''' •-•-•..;--f!.14 ..P"-':''C''1.5t1 s• ' li...,X,...,,'-,' -2t- ,/',';/,'(--r:i c:,.) . --,-, ' ',,,,,,Fii;,•,-;`-',1:;: IF, ...Kr';'t.-772., -,---,;-5,.. ! „„— --,..> i ,, 1 I . ) N ..,-, ,---1 ..":.,,-11,.. :._,) (/c*/e t?...--'11' "i c '''' ''"1 I ----1 1 i , ,, / ' fl .,,,?...60•;'?..: t'•;.•Es-,.'',,,,,••.• T tl.;I: I I,',e.it'l.6'' 0. --.4-0/'''''''''.'1.1,-;')' --" ,,t I (7 -4,,,,,,,,,,,,_, '-rs' n-4'''. ..r.,..2.,....2,, k,-,,,.• e d, .:,• t ,•-_,,t,‘ ,_ / / i , ':e.• •:-.,-,..,NSA Ir:•="1 . ` / S'n--.-•:,.--- i ;:'•i•q,',',i ••••,-'•‘-,'.,..•:, P.Lciii-i-ox-, y-i, /Ile -de t24. el 4:1`•';:•:.-- L•-•!4--"i,:;: ' I, it: ?A•k V,-Y::,,,.'12-,--:tp,0,,`,`,,,'%''..",t7;=e7?:r.,,,- •:..'„ P;;,;:l.''''%''N",`t,-.4...S1'1.'','"t,', •'.,,`'. . . . ,::. -.44';'''' 4.'.;',t'''''.'t.":::',1;:.."',,/ 240:''''''.":•,,,:,1'.:2?-'Z.;„;1:',-...,:i'f."..,:C:,::.,:-.i':,...51:=C.; ▪2rei;-:,,,--.4.`,:_i,,....-'2':,,,,,::_,,J.:;_::-.1_:.11-:-..7,,L..`..,/.2,- • . . December 7. 1992 Renton City Council Minutes Page 554 Transit proposals in the plan include a regional rail line along the existing Burlington Northern right-of-way to create a stop at the existing downtown station; a shuttle bus to connect the downtown area with the major employment areas in the City; and an increase of the overall bus service from the downtown area to other areas. It was stressed that a positive image for the downtown area must be created. A pedestrian-oriented environment is proposed that would include higher street trees; pedestrian amenities; pedestrian light standards; and changing the facade design to improve the appearance of downtown buildings. Councilman Tanner questioned whether decisions are going to be made prior to the time Council votes on the Comprehensive Plan. Ms. Holzschuh stated that the consultant and State work should be completed by September, 1993 at the latest. DRA has requested a continuation of funding through September - October, 1994 for the revitalization efforts. Councilman Stredicke asked if DRA has submitted a letter to the City requesting a directional traffic on Second Avenue and Third Avenue, and also for the removal of the planter strips to improve parking. Ms. Holzschuh responded that only the concepts have been presented to City staff. After staff comments have been received and reviewed, a telephone survey will be conducted to validate the proposed changes. Jay Covington noted that the City, DRA, and its consultant have attempted to obtain citizen input in a number of ways. The concepts presented were developed using this input. The next step will be to further refine concepts and proceed to the next phase. AUDIENCE COMMENT Mr. Frank Davidson, 17419 - 119th Lane SE, Renton, Trustee of the Citizen Comment Renton Historical Society which oversees the Renton Museum, and Davidson - Renton Rosemary Green, President of the Renton Historical Society, stated that Museum the Renton Museum needs a full-time director to oversee the large operation and maintain the existing quality. Councilwoman Mathews noted that funding was approved in the 1993 budget for either a full-time manager for the Museum beginning mid- 1993, or a half-time manager beginning now. Mr. Davidson stated that the Historical Society prefers a full-time manager beginning mid-1993. Citizen Comment Mr. Everett Wilcock, 11830 - 164th Ave. S.E., Renton 98059, spoke on Wilcock - East Renton behalf of the East Renton community requesting inclusion in any future Interceptor discussions concerning the proposed East Renton Interceptor. He objected to a plan which provides service primarily to areas in King County. December 7. 1992 Renton City Council Minutes Page 555 Citizen Comment David Bricklin, Attorney at Law, Suite 1015, Fourth & Pike Building, Bricklin - East Renton 1424 Fourth Avenue, Seattle 98101, representing citizens of the East Interceptor Renton Plateau, stated that he has looked into the legal issues surrounding the proposed extension of the East Renton Interceptor. He pointed out potential problems from acknowledged inconsistencies between the East Maplewood alternative and King County's Sewerage General Plan and the Newcastle Community Plan. In addition, the County ordinance prohibits the extension of sewer service beyond the local service area (LSA) which has been proposed under the East Maplewood alternative. Citizen Comment Rietti Joe Rietti, 13635 SE 135th,Renton 98059, expressed the opinion that the - East Renton Interceptor East Renton Plateau is not a threat to the aquifer. He noted that soil conditions in the plateau area are good for septic tanks if they are properly maintained. Citizen Comment Daniel Potoshnik, 13405 - 142nd Avenue, Renton 98059, stated his Potoshnik East Renton opposition to the proposed East Renton Interceptor project. He submitted Interceptor a list of 15 citizens in the 142nd Avenue neighborhood who oppose location of the sewer line through King County on 142nd Avenue, and support a location in the City limits. Mr. Potoshnik requested that he be notified of any future meetings regarding this issue. Councilwoman Mathews clarified that although the trunk line is planned along 142nd in King County, residents will not be allowed to connect unless they annex to the City or have a health emergency from septic system failure. In response, Mr. Potoshnik noted that the residents of East Renton are against the installation of the line in King County. Upon Council request, Dave Christensen, Engineering Specialist, stated that the sizing for the interceptor took into account all potential service areas which included unincorporated King County. He advised that the size of a facility must be determined by assessing future, not current, needs. In response, Mr. Potoshnik further stated his objection to tearing up the streets up twice, once to lay the line and then again for connection to the line. Citizen Comment Griffin Ray Griffin, 14306 - 144th Ave. SE, Renton 98059, expressed his - East Renton Interceptor concern over preferred alternative 1, East Maplewood, of the East Renton Interceptor project. Mr. Griffin stated that alternative number 2, South Highlands Interceptor, would be the better choice since it has an 8% grade to the valley floor and provides aquifer protection. He requested that the City also consider placing a minimum 36" diameter storm drain pipe in the same ditch as the proposed interceptor. Citizen Comment Mike Forrester, 15445 S.E. Fairwood Blvd., Renton 98058, expressed Forrester - concern over Comprehensive Plan zoning for property he owns at 1522 Comprehensive Plan North Brooks. He noted that the proposed zoning is single family use, but the property has been used as office for the past 23 years. Mr. Forrester requested that this parcel of land be designated for office use which would be compatible with surrounding businesses and the railroad tracks. December 7. 1992 Renton City Council Minutes Page 556 Citizen Comment Martin Paquette, Renton Technical College, 3000 NE 4th, Renton, Paquette - Renton expressed his appreciation to the City for donating surveying equipment Technical College to the College. (See later action.) Donation Citizen Comment Paul Lindberg, 13836 SE 131st, Renton 98059, expressed his Lindberg - East Renton dissatisfaction over the proposed East Renton Interceptor project. Interceptor CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. At Council request, Items 6.d and 6.g. were removed for separate consideration. Finance: 1993 Property Administrative Services Department requested adoption of 1993 property Tax Ordinance tax levy ordinance. Council concur. (See later action.) Finance: Authorized Administrative Services Department requested adoption of a resolution to Signatures update and consolidate authorized signatures and persons for check issuance, endorsement, and electronic fund transfers of all City accounts. Refer to Finance Committee. Finance: 1992 Budget Administrative Services Department requested adjustment to the 1992 Year-End Adjustment City of Renton year-end budget in the total amount of $4,048,409. Refer to Finance Committee. Legal: Remand of Appeal City Attorney requested ordinance requiring remand of appeal to Council for Additional Testimony from Hearing Examiner's decision when it is necessary to take additional or Evidence testimony or allow additional evidence. Refer to Planning and Development Committee. CAG: 92-113, Senior City Clerk reports bid opening on 11/16/92 for window coverings for the Housing Project Window Senior Housing Project 6 bids; engineer's estimate was $18,000.00; and Coverings submits Senior Housing Project Manager recommendation to award contract to James R. Irwin & Associates, d.b.a. Design Construction Associates, in the amount of $10,123.00. Council concur. CAG: 83-038, Ivar's Community Services Department requested extension to 10/30/93 of Seafood Bar CAG-83-038 for Ivar's Seafood Bar at Coulon Beach Park. Refer to Community Services Committee. Legislature: 1993 Executive Division requested adoption of 1993 Legislative priorities as Legislative Priorities presented and authorized the administration and Council representatives to represent the City's position before the Legislature. Refer to Committee of the Whole. Personnel: Position Personnel Department requested position reclassification for the Lead Reclassifications Court Clerk and Community Program Coordinator. Refer to Finance/Personnel Committee. Public Works: Renton Technical Services Division recommended that Council grant the Mayor Technical College authority to donate surveying equipment to Renton Technical College. Equipment Donation Council concur. A66-/ 6-7Ø -( BRICKLIN & GENDLER ATTORNEYS-AT-LAW SUITE 1015 FOURTH AND PIKE BUILDING 1424 FOURTH AVENUE - . SEATTLE,WA 98101 DAVID A. BRICKLIN ', ( )621-8868 MICHAEL W.GENDLER DAVID S. MANN FAX(206) 621-0512 December 7, 1992 Mayor Earl Clymer Renton City Council . 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 '. Re: . East Renton Interceptor• Project Dear Mayor and City Council Members: I write on behalf of the East Renton Plateau Community Council to warn about a potential legal problem whichwouldoccur if you proceedwith the East Maplewood alternative. The legal problemarisesfrom the acknowledged inconsistency between the East Maplewood alternative and King County's Sewerage General Plan and Newcastle Community Plan. The EIS for this project acknowledges that -" [e]xtension of sewer. ., service :beyond the LSA [Local Service Areas] is prohibited by County ordinance (King County Code 20 . 12 . 160) . " EIS at 55. The EIS also acknowledges that major portions of the unincorporated areas to be served by the East. Maplewood alternative would be beyond the existing LSA. Consequently, on its face, this alternative is in violation. of the County code and would be illegal . The EIS attempts to avoid this inconsistency and illegality by noting that the East Maplewood alternativeisconsistent .with the King County Comprehensive Plan. The EISargues that as between the -Comprehensive Plan, on the onehand, and the Sewerage General and Newcastle Community Plan on the other, the County's Comprehensive Plan will take precedence. In'fact, the EIS comes to the remarkable. (and incorrect) conclusion that the Newcastle Plan "would probably become void. " EIS at 57 . - There are several significant flaws in the_ analysis presented - , in the EIS. First, the EIS fails 'to- distinguish. between actions taken beforeand after new- Comprehensive Plans are adopted by the City and County, pursuant to the GMA. Assuming , action on this proposal is taken prior to adoption of new comprehensive planspursuant to the GMA, the City is bound by the existing comprehensive plans, ., community plans and implementing ordinance's . The existing, pre-GMA plans and Mayor Earl Clymer December 7, 1992 Page :2 . ordinances are quite explicit in prohibiting the. City's pursuit of the East Maplewood alternative. Speculating as to what might happen with GMA implementation will not make an otherwise illegal action legal. Second, the EIS is wrong in suggesting that if there is an inconsistency between the County' s Comprehensive Plan and the Newcastle Community Plan that the, Comprehensive Plan will take precedence. Just the opposite is the case. The King County Comprehensive Plan foresaw the possibility that LSA boundary adjustmentsmight arise in areas where there ,was an inconsistency between the Comprehensive Plan and the more specific community plan. The Comprehensive Plan specifically resolved this potential inconsistency by giving precedence to the community plan. • See King County Comprehensive Plan Policy F-316 . Because, as the EIS frankly acknowledges, the East Maplewood alternative is not consistent with the Newcastle Community Plan, EIS at 671, the East Maplewood alternative is illegal and reference to the Comprehensive Plandoes not save it. Ironically, the' City of Renton has previously acknowledged the primacy of King County.community plans when there is a conflict with the County Comprehensive Plan. In ' 1990, there was a proposal, for the White Gate subdivision, a •high density development in the unincorporated portion of May Valley. The same Newcastle. Community Plan Policy (N-55) which " prohibits sewerextensions into the East RentonPlateau beyond the current LSA also prohibits sewer extensions inthe May Valley beyond' the current LSA. . In the White Gate subdivision case, though, the City acknowledged, that preliminary plat approval "should be withheld pending LSA boundary adjustment approval and a Community ' Plan Amendment. " Letter from Erickson to Zoning and Subdivision Examiner (May 24, 1990) (copy attached)-. In the :White Gate case, the City of Renton took, the position that the subdivision approval, '•which required an LSA adjustment, should be withheld until after the Newcastle Community Plan was amended. The same situation exists here. The City of Renton should withhold any action on the East Maplewood alternative until (and unless) there is an amendment -1 In addition to the Newcastle Plan policies cited in the EIS, the proposal may also be inconsistent with Policy N-56 and N- 57 . Mayor Earl Clymer December 7, 1992 Page 3 to the Newcastle Community Plan. ' Our analysis is similar to .that previously provided to the City by King County's Planning and Community Development Division. See EIS Chapter "4, Comment Letter F. As King County stated unequivocally: The King County Comprehensive Plan and provisions of state law, including the Growth Management Act, will guide the update of the Newcastle Plan. At that time the Local Service Agreement (LSA) boundaries for sewer, service will be addressed. An update of the Newcastle Plan has not yet been scheduled. 'In the meantime, the Newcastle Community Plan andArea : Zoning remain in effect, and land . capacity and population projection should be based on ,these documents . - The City acknowledges that before sewer service can be extended to this area., the ,LSA must be amended ,by the , King' County Council But the City has refused to acknowledge that King County typicallywill' not amend the LSA except through, the community planning process. Id. The City seems intent on ignoring this requirement. Similarly, King. County Council must approve sewer service to the area by adopting Renton' s sewer Comprehensive Plan and must grant a franchise to construct the sewer line within County right-of-way. Id. The City is ignoring clear legal requirements in assuming that it can ignore the requirements of the existing Newcastle Community Plan and proceed with the East, Maplewood' alternative. We acknowledge that the Newcastle Community Plan likely will be updated as 'part of King , County's implementation activities pursuant to the . GMA. However, that update is several years off. Until• : such time as the, update (amendment) occurs, ' the " City of Renton is 'legally precluded from' extending sewer utilities into the unincorporated portions of the County not . covered by an existing LSA Looking ahead, the EIS also commits an error inspeculating as to the likely demise of that portion of the Newcastle. Community Plan which seeks 'to hold in place _ the .current ' LSA 'line. , Contrary to the representation in the EIS, there is not a firm preliminary decision on the future location of the urban/rural linein the vicinity of this project. Rather, a study group Mayor Earl Clymer. December 7, 1992 Page 4 has been formed to determine where the urban/rural line should run in this area. It is premature, at this date, to assume that the, line 'will run in any particular location, let alone a location which would- be consistent with the East. Maplewood alternative. ' At' this stage, neither an urban/rural line., nor a new Comprehensive Plan hasbeen adopted. by King County. The Newcastle Plan remains in effect. . Construction of the East Maplewood alternative would be inconsistent with King County Plans and Ordinances and would be a violation of law.• The City of, Renton hasnolegal authority to pursue this alternative at. : this time. I would be happy to discuss- .these' matters with you or your City attorney. 'Thank you for the opportunity to present them in this letter and at yourhearing on Monday, December .7, 1992 . : Very truly yours, BRICKL N & GENDL R / Ci David A. Bricklin . DAB/mby cc.: King County Councilman Bruce Laing (District No. 6) . King County. Councilwoman Cynthia Sullivan, Chair, Growth Management Implementation Committee Miriam.'Greenbaum, King County Planning and Community Development Commission East Renton Plateau Community Council CITY OF RENTON Administrative Services Earl Clymer, Mayor Dan Clements, Director NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING EAST RENTON INTERCEPTOR - SELECTION OF PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE Renton City Council January 11, 1993. YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that the Renton City Council will hold a public hearing at 7:30 PM on January 11 , 1993, to consider selection of a preferred alternative for the East Renton Interceptor project. The public hearing will be held in the second floor Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Written protests may be filed with the City Clerk at or prior to the time fixed for the hearing. Protests should contain identifying descriptions of the property. Persons may otherwise appear and present their opinions orally; however, all protests must be submittedin writing. The primary purpose of the East Renton Interceptor project is to relieve current capacity restraints within the Maplewood, Heather Downs and a .portion of the South Highlands Sub-basins. There currently exists a moratorium of new connections to the sewer system in this area. This project will permit the City_to remove the moratorium. In addition, the project will provide different levels of future service area and capacity depending upon which alternative is selected. Upon selection of an alternative by Council, Wastewater Utility staff and Planning staff will prepare a mitigation document on the selected alternative for approvalby the City's Environmental Review Committee. This document will be subject to a twenty day comment and appeal period in accordance with City adopted SEPA regulations. • For additional information, please contact David Christensen of the Wastewater Utility Section at 277-6212. Sincerely, • 47 Marilyn.J. sen, CMC City Clerk • C:DOCS:92-1002:DMC:ps CC: Mayor Earl Clymer Lynn Guttmann David M. Christensen 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 Harold Reynolds - .. . • "' Ken Crossman Willie Velasquez 13016 156th Ave. SE . . - • 13613 139th Ave. SE 14134 142nd SE ,__- Renton, WA 98056 . . ; Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Roxanne Reynolds . Kathy Collins r. Robert C. Jones 1 13016 156th Ave. SE - • ' • • 14110 SE 141st Boeing Comm. Airplane Group Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98059 PO Box 3707, MS 70-14 r Seattle, WA 98124-2007 Calvin Wilburn .. Carole Harding Dean W. Tibbott r 13826 SE 142nd St • '': • • 14243 SE 146th The Tibbott Company 1 Renton, WA 98056 : .. . • , Renton, WA 98056 17003 NE 28th Pl. . Bellevue, WA 98008 . i 1 Erma Wilburn . Ray LaBlanc Mr. Jim Scappini x- 13826 SE 142nd St 11621 SE 47th Pl. 12815 - 138th.Avenue SE Renton, WA 98056 ; Bellevue, WA 98006 Renton, WA 98059 Ruth Dorward • - . Karl Goeres 14243 140th Ave. SE . . . 13116 13.8th Ave. SE Renton, WA 98056. Renton,'WA 98056 1. • Julian Sayers, Pres Marianne Manville • Gloria Olson The Sayers Associates;•:Inc. , PO Box 97304 401 Park Drive, Ste 221 1133 - 37th Avenue. • . Bellevue,VA 98009 • • Kirkland, WA 98033 Seattle, WA 98122 • . . • . Union 's, : - Associates . • Bill & Sharon Arthur Attn: Ch-. ., . Henry •: . , . . 14236 140th SE .., 1090 ' 8th ' eet, Ste 900 . . Renton, WA 98056 Belle e, WA 98.004 Sylvia Leflek . Tammy Possum & Lane Hale Alda Wilkinson 12255 142nd Ave. SE • ! 14228 140th Ave. SE Boundary Review Board j Renton, WA 98056 . .. :Renton, WA 98059 •. 3600 - 136th Pl. SE. I Bellevue, WA 98006-1400 . . r Gerald Leflek • 'Larry &Evelyn Holme 12255 142nd Ave. SE ' • - 13568. 139th Pl. SE . Renton, WA 98056 . • • . . . :Renton, WA 980.56 Ann Plath Jason & Liz Close 14004'SE 144th St • ' 13715 139th Ave. SE ' Renton, WA 98056 ,, Renton, WA 98056 1262.26(:436) Elizabeth.J. Menzel'' Bill Hoxie Chris & Tim Clifford -, 13803 SE 144th St 13837 SE 142nd 2712 Talbot Rd. S. 1 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 9805.5 Brian D. Smith' George Sharpe Mel Aakre 14805:SE 139th Ct 14227 140th Ave.'SE 14209 SE 144th St .- • I Renton, WA 98056. Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 IDave Welghall Ed & Ka.role Evans Nolmu Fergus 2504 NE 4th St ' •' 13914 SE 144th St 13714 SE 141st St 1 Renton, WA 98056 ' ' Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98059 i Wally Christensen ' Joyee & Brian Sperry Mel: . - M. quin 13723 SE 141st • ' 14007 143rd SE 14021 1••.rd Ave. SE , Renton, WA 98059 Renton, WA 98059 Rento. • 98056 j f �2 Al Sebastian • " ' • Sharon Bakeroquin 1 14312.144th Ave SE , 13826 SE 141st 14021 143rd Ave. SE Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 . . ' • Rayral Kaji Sue Rigtrup Jay Anderson 1 14320 SE 144th St • 14212 140th SE 14404 143rd Pl. SE i Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056. DeLoreal Tonda 'Emily Johnston Myrna Busch , 14204 140th SE 13558 139th Pl. SE • ' PO Box 2184 { Renton, WA 98056Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 1 R. C. Jones . . • ' Alvin & Jane Cluskey° • Steve Wrigley. • 13920 147th Pl, SE 14211 140th SE 14220 140th'SE Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 9805 1 1 Bev Pillo Ray & ,J _. ene G.i I • Hidla Nichols I 860 Chelan Ave. NE . ' 14306 • • •.. Ave. SE 14211 SE 146th St Renton, WA 98056 Re. •n, WA ,:059 ' Renton, WA 98056 1 Norma & Roy Luarette Don & : " en Hamblin . 14006 143rd SE 13025 13: : E ' Ray Nichols 1 Renton, WA 98056 ' Rento. ' A '9 6 14211 SE 146th St Renton, WA 98056 a i ' Puge • ound Co ncil of City . Re.ton r I cn Gov rime t Par• & B.- reat. Dep _ . 126 Fiirst ve. S. 1 01 Bron:.n Wa 981 Se ttle, WA -nton, WA •:I 5 � ; :��a �•. -, • . Grea . nton . . ....erof - ti 7';i . b: Paul and Ruth Brandal 1309. � N,-.' �'y 2.-`- Co erce Sunnyside Blvd ::.w : ✓; .a . 30' Rainier �. ; �,, Everett, WA 98205 � � � � •: ' • :nton, WA 9 _ 1. x Ty Ribera o ,�.�'" James White , m . 4, 14829 SE 128th Street 4222 NE 19th Street I•� .` 5, • WA 98059Renton, WA 98059 Renton, E •�� _ .7�: 1; Craig Gruegerenon I- _: 1560 140th Avenue NE • ' P . . Comzni- ion i is � 1-•`L• ., ,,,.` . Suite 100 00 Mil, Ave. Bellevue, WA 98005 •enton, -• •• •8055 r Cit •f R•nton Ci • of 'enton r Attn: S ty Attorney 'slice De•t. 200 lI •ve. So. '00 Mill •ve. s. Ren an, • 98055 'enton, • '8055 r i City o enton City : Re•, .n ' Fire I ep. • Pub 'c Wor • Dept r 211 ' •ve. So 20$ Mill Av:. So Res ton, , •:055 Res ton, WA 9:055 1 I City o ' -nton City . 'enton He: , .g :xaminer': Office , S .•A • ormatio• enter 201 Mill •ve. So. 210 Mill •ve. So ' : 'ton, ' . 981 5 -nton, • •:055 City of • - . .n/Mayor Iss:. : . ..ool Dis a ' t 411 Attn: May or's Assistant 56• NW Ho Stree 200 ' A e. So. I Is.aquah, • 981 7 I Rento•, WA 98055 r Rento 2 '-. .lic Library Irene Larsen Hig•4 ands ;ranch 12633 SE 158th Street 7 290? NE 12.. Renton, WA 98058 f ' Res ton, WA • :$ 5 r', Ren . . Pudic Library M:'. Bran 10$ Mill A e. So. r Reston, WA 9:e 5 I Muckleshoot Tribe Council - Valley Daily News, Editor 7 39015 - 172nd Ave. SE. PO Box 10 Auburn, WA 98002 Kent, WA 98032 Duwamish Tribal Office 15616 - 1st Ave. S. Seattle, Wa 98148 Renton School Dist. # 403 435 Main Ave. S. • Renton, WA 98055 Seattle Post-Intelligencer Business News 1001 Elliott Ave. W. Seattle, WA 98111 • • Darlene Madenwald Wa Environmental Council 5200 University Way NE, #201 Seattle, WA 98105 •, Seattle Times-Eastside Edition Business News \ PO Box 70 Seattle, WA 98111 Daniel Potoshnik ✓ Mr/Mrs Bruce Osgoodby ✓ Donald 13405 - 142nd Ave SE 13456 - 156th Ave SE 13025 - 138th Ave SE Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98059 J. A. Taylor / K L Waddell ✓ P Koler 13319 - 142nd Ave SE 133007 - 142nd Ave SE 13217 - 142nd Ave SE Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98059 Laurie and Rich Lytle / Cynthia and Norman Green ./ Mike and Shirley Coughlin .— 13205 - 142nd Ave SE 14128 SE 132nd ST 14126 SE 135th ST Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98059 Everett Wilcock V Joe Riedi ✓ David Bricklin '- 11830 - 164th Ave SE 13635 SE 135th 1424 Fourth Ave STE 1015 Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98059 Seattle WA 98101 RayI(Griffin ✓' Paul Lindberg ,/ Russell Berg 14306 - 144th Ave SE 13836 SE 131st 14017 SE 139th Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98056 Renton WA 98059 Jim Coan Patrick Evans Craig Landou 375 Union Avenue SE - #155 3306 NE 11th Place 10520 - 169th Ave SE Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98056 Renton WA 98056 A. Duffus Mr. & Mrs A W Gumser Mary Merbach 701 Sunset Blvd NE 13640 SE 135th Street 13732 SE 141st Renton WA 98056 Renton WA 98056 Renton WA 98059 Raymond A. LaBlanc Cheryl Henry 11621 SE 47th Place 10900 NE 8th St -#900 BellevueWA 98006 Bellevue WA 98004 Larry Brown Todd R. Woosley 261 SW 41st The Burnstead Construction Co Jacquelyn Randall Renton WA 98055 1215 - 120th Ave NE STE 201 ento SE 409h R Bellevue WA 98005-2135 Renton WA 98059 East Renton Interceptor Bi 11 Lusher c:Docs:sa-s74:DMc:ps 14636 SE 140th Place Renton WA 98059 EAST RENTON INTERCEPTOR FINAL EIS December 7 , 1992 First and foremost , I want to emphasize that alternative number 1 , East Maplewood , is not consistent with either The Newcastle Community Plan or The King County Comprehensive plan, according to your own FEIS and King County Planning staff . True the King County Council stated that it was the intent of the county to have 8 dwelling units per acre as a goal in urban areas . This does not change the Newcastle Community Plan nor does it say that this density is appropriate for the East Renton Plateau. The City of Renton has stated several times that the 8 dwelling unit density is too great for this portion of unincorporated King County even though it is designated urban in the community plan. The FEIS states that the Maplewood wells will be a regional water supply source in the future . That means that the city intends to sell water as Seattle does . The difference is that the general public , along with their roads , homes , and sewer interceptors do not come within miles of Seattles ' water supply. Do any of you believe that Seattle would ever permit urban development in its watershed? Even with sewers and properly designed storm drains you all know it would never happen. The wells in downtown Renton will supply all the needed water for the city. Why should you intentionally go looking for trouble , especially when your own FEIS states that the shallow Renton Highlands Aquifer may already be contaminated and may be a source of recharge for the Maplewood Aquifer and that there is a potential for contaminants from land use activities within the study area to reach the City' s source of drinking water at the Maplewood Golf Course . As to stormwater management , I notice that response PM-26 on page 120 of the FEIS states that , "Renton is committed to providing appropriate plans and regulations to manage stormwater . Proper management of water resources begins with a recognition of the natural interrelationship of surface water and ground water . Increased stormwater run-off means decreased natural recharge of Rentons ' aquifers . Therefore , Renton is developing stormwater standards that exceed the current standards of King County in order to do a better job of maintaining base stream flows and ground water recharge . Renton also does not want excess water and sediment in Maplewood Creek because of the damage it causes to the cities ' Maplewood Golf Course and Clubhouse . " I don' t know if the author of the responses is aware of the fact that I have been requesting the city to do just that for over thirteen years , all to no avail . I have talked to every person in Renton City Hall that has anything to do with directing policy concerning stormwater . The Mayor , the City Council , The Hearing Examiner , Department heads , engineers , and I even wrote to the news paper . The result of my effort was that the city not only allows more storm waters in Maplewood Creek with each new development , but it even diverts water from another drainage basin into it on Union St . i�1--(1GY0'- `' kc,(11,14/"I Page 2 FEIS Proposed new developments such as The Orchards , Forrest Creste , The Senescue Annexation, all will be dumping more storm waters into Maplewood Creek providing higher peak flows of longer duration. All this Non-Point pollution, eroding the canyon, silting the stream and river , depositing hundreds of tons of sand and gravel on Golf Course property annually, and it all runs over and into the aquifer . Metros ' interceptor runs all along the aquifer and now staff is recommending Alternative #1 , another interceptor crossing your very precious aquifer carrying all the effluent that will be generated on 1200 acres by 4 , 500 dwelling units . In my opinion, clearly Alternative #2 , The South Highlands Interceptor , with only a 8% grade to the valley floor , is the superior choice to fulfill the needs of the city and at the same time provide the maximum amount of protection to the aquifer . It also complies with the Growth Management Act , by assuring adequate utilities for infill whereas the Maplewood Heights Interceptor would tend to promote sprawl in an area even the city wants to remain low density. If the Maplewood Heights alignment is chosen King County Surface Water Management should be approached to include a 36" storm drain pipe in the same trench to the bottom of the hill where it can discharge into the Cedar River without causing canyon erosion and the creek waters will tend to be less polluted. There is in one part of the FEIS an allegation that a spring below the development of Maplewood Heights was monitored ten times between April 91 and September of 92 and that the Nitrate levels ranged from a low of 4 . 3 mg/1 to a high of 11 . 6 mg/1 it also said that nitrate levels are allowed to run at 10 mg/ 1 per WAC Standards and that the mean level of the spring was 8 . 2 mg/ 1 well below the allowable maximum. Did you notice that not once in a years time did the nitrate level reach as high as the maximum allowable level . It took 79 weeks of testing to get the spring to fail the test once , and only after the rains came at the end of the longest drought I can remember . This is quite normal and to be expected , if you doubt me , check the spring now , or ask your experts . According to the King County Health Dept . official that conducted the study on failed septic systems in the East Renton area , " The majority of failed systems found was located within the Renton city limits and the other few that were failing had also failed years ago because the land just did not perk . " Failures were not attributed primarily to the age of systems , but to the soils . All checking was done visually and consisted of looking at the earth covering the tank and drainfields . Page 3 FEIS - In conclusion, to comply with the laws of the land , The Newcastle Community Plan and The Growth Management Act , and to satisfy the needs of The City of Renton, I urge you to recommend either alternative number 2 .or number 3 . No matter which alternative you choose , I urge you to also consider at _least a..36" diameter storm drain pi e beir1g__-1,Qc_at_- • in t e same ditch as thei1 ceptor . E'en—not tear up the roads any more than is necessary '—and-ir will be needed if the city grows as you anticipate , retrofitting is an unnecessary expense the ratepayer can ill afford. , IcA7(r2;:-- 7 Ray Griffin 14306 144th Avenue South East Renton, WA 98059 November 23, 1992 Renton City Council Minutes Page 545 Airport: Airport Fire Transportation (Aviation) Committee Chairman Stredicke presented a Lane Access report stating that developers of property at the northwest corner of the Airport require a fire access route through Airport property to the east side of their property. A Fire Lane Access Permit has been prepared and is to be exchanged for an Avigation Easement. A Covenant to Annex to the City of Renton has been received from the developer. The Permit, the Easement, and the Covenant shall individually and collectively become effective upon the exchange of the Fire Lane Access Permit and the Avigation Easement.. The Transportation (Aviation) Committee recommended that the City Council approve the Fire Lane Access Permit and authorize the Mayor and city clerk to execute the Permit, and that the Fire Lane Access Permit and the Covenant to Annex to the City of Renton become effective upon the City's receipt of an Avigation Easement over the subject property owned by John E. Harer and located at 11448 Rainier Avenue. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY TANNER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Public Works: Closure of Councilman Stredicke requested that the Transportation Department SW 16th Street provide the costs associated with the construction of the 16th Street bridge prior to the December 1 Transportation Committee meeting. Metro: Proposed Transit Mayor Clymer reported that staff is working with Metro to come to a System resolution on the rail system issue. No decisions have been made and discussions continue. After reviewing the City's proposed comments on the draft EIS, Councilman Tanner urged that the City discontinue efforts to connect to the rail system since it is not economically feasible. Mayor Clymer indicated that he has committed to the project until the end of the month. Mr. Covington asked that comments regarding the draft EIS be submitted by November 30, 1992. Public Works: ast It was noted that the EIS and different proposed routes for the East Renton Interceptor Renton Interceptor will be presented to the Utilities Committee on December 17. The proposals will also be presented to full Council at a later date. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS The following ordinances were presented for first reading and referred to the 12/7/92 Council meeting for adoption: Board/Commission: An ordinance was read amending Section 2-8-1 of Chapter 8, Municipal Municipal Arts Arts Commission, of Title II (Commissions and Boards), of City Code, Commission, Residency relating to membership residency. (See motion on Page 543.) Requirements November 9. 1992 Renton City Council Minutes Page 521 Citizen Comment Powell Referred 10/05/92 - Request from Powell Corporation to rezone SW 41st Development Corporation Street to allow drive-through banking and restaurant facilities. - Rezone Request, SW 41st Street Memorandum from Administrator Guttmann stated that it would be appropriate for the area located near East Valley Highway and S.W. 34th Street to be zoned for drive-through banking and a fast food restaurant. She also noted that the zoning request will be incorporated into the matrix being developed for the Land Use Comprehensive Plan Element. Public Works: East Referred 10/05/92 - Request from Councilman Stredicke for information Renton Sewer Interceptor on the East Renton Sewer Interceptor and sewer moratorium. Memorandum from Administrator Guttmann stated that upon receipt of the draft EIS for the East Renton Sewer Interceptor, staff addressed: (1) a preliminary design report; (2) financing of the interceptor project; and (3) completion of the Environmental Impact Study. Ms. Guttmann further projected that the moratorium will be lifted August 31, 1993, and construction on the interceptor will be completed by October, 1994. Citizen Comment: Referred 10/12/92 - Correspondence from Jeanne and Edward Hughes Hughes/LaCheck - and Kimberly LaCheck requesting a lot line adjustment for property Lot Line Adjustment, located on North 28th Street. N. 28th Street Memorandum from Administrator Guttmann stated that the City has not received an official lot line adjustment request for the subject property. Ms. Guttmann stated further that during communication with involved parties about proposed property uses, Development Services Director Jim Hanson has advised that they submit an application for an easement. Citizen Comment: Referred 10/19/92 - Letter received from Jim and Paula Ratcliff Ratcliff, Noise from I- concerning the noise levels from I-405. 405 Memorandum from Administrator Guttmann stated that traffic noise is exempt from provisions of the noise regulations that are enforceable by the City, and the City has no authority to require WSDOT to take remedial action. She stated further that WSDOT is aware of the situation and has deferred action until 1995. Council President Keolker-Wheeler requested that the 1-405 Construction Project Committee be asked to further review this issue. Streets: House Way Referred 10/26/92 - Council President Keolker-Wheeler questioned: (1) Traffic Light and Traffic Why a stoplight rather than a pedestrian light was installed between Revision on Main Street Liberty Park and the Community Center on Houser Way; and (2) Why a left-turn only marking was installed on the corner of 2nd and Main? Correspondence received from Administrator Guttmann clarified that: 1) Pedestrians crossing at Henry Moses Pool and Houser Way must push a button to activate the signal for pedestrian movement. In order to alert motorists to the signal, a side fire signal head has been installed on the east side of Houser approaching the bridge to accommodate the sight-distance problem created by the curve in the road and two advanced signals signs have been placed south of the bridge crossing. RECExVpp• CITY OF RENTON OCT 1.5 1992 MEMORANDUM �►fyorsC��x�, DATE: • October 13, 1992 TO: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, President �FCFIVED Members of the City Council OCT , 1992 VIA: Mayor Earl Clym FROM: Lynn t n r(l_.N I ON CITY COUNCIL STAFF CONTACT: David Chri t' sen SUBJECT: EAST RENTON INTERCEPTOR PROJECT STATUS REPORT BACKGROUND: - As a result of a number of large scale development requests (i.e. Orchards, Forest Creste, Crown Pointe II, etc.) as well as a large annexation request (Balko) on the East Renton plateau, City staff requested the services of RH2 Engineering to perform an analysis of capacity within the South Highlands, Heather Downs, and Maplewood Sewer Sub-basins. The analysis not only revealed that there was insufficient capacity to allow the proposed developments, it also determined that certain segments under current conditions were in fact operating above their capacity. Given this information, Council placed a moratorium on new connections to the Heather Downs, Maplewood, and South Highlands Sub-basins by Resolution 2764 (see attached). Council also directed staff to identify alternative solutions for providing the capacity necessary to remove the moratorium and the capacity necessary for the long term needs of the three basins. Three alternatives were identified that meet the minimum criteria listed above. These alternatives are known as the South Highlands alternative, the West Maplewood alternative, and the East Maplewood alternative. A Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) was issued in November of 1991 which addressed each of the above-mentioned alternatives as well as a no-action alternative. DISCUSSION: Upon conclusion of the comment period for the DEIS, staff through its consultant, worked on three major items. The first item was the preliminary design report. This report analyzed each action alternative in greater detail in order to provide a clearer understanding of the impacts associated with each alternate. The primary objective was to minimize impacts to the environment (wetlands, steep slopes, etc.) while at t►,P timP. nrovidinq cost effective routing. The report revised the original routes Kathy Keolker-Wheeler/Me rs of Council Page' 2 JEast Renton .Interceptor - ' '1r�ct Status Report such that no wetlands will be impacted, that the impacts to steep slopes will be minimal during construction with construction techniques available to mitigate those minor impacts, and such that the routes were most- cost effective from both a construction standpoint as well as a long term maintenance standpoint. The second item dealt with the financing of the interceptor project. In June of this year staff made application for a Public Works Trust Fund loan through the state's Department of Community Development (DCD). In September we received a letter from the state's DCD that we were ranked No. 5 to receive funding from the 1993 loan cycle pending Legislature approval. This approval is anticipated to occur sometime between=January and April of 1993. Our loan request was for $2,542,704 with the remaining $800,000 of the $3,354,704 estimated budget coming from existing CIP funds which are dedicated to this project. Upon approval by the Legislature of the list presented, we should be able to finalize the loan agreement (with Council approval) by July of 1993. The third item was completion of the Environmental Impact Statement. One of the major difficulties this project faced from the onset is the state of flux that exists in both the City and the County regarding land use designations as a result of the passage of the Growth Management Act (GMA) in 1990 by the State. The primary problem stems from the requirement under 'SEPA that a 'project must be consistent with those plans (land use, zoning, neighborhood) in place at the time of development and the fact that both the City and County were in the midst of revisions to these plans that would have a significant impact on this project. It has in fact proven beneficial to;wait out the initial process the City and County have undertaken, for it shows that under current proposals from both agencies, the East Renton Interceptor is in compliance with the goals and objectives of both plans. As you can see from the schedule herein, we hope to publish the final EIS on November 20, 1992. With the publishing of the final EIS coupled 'with the completion of the pre-design report, we will prepare a staff recommendation of a preferred alternative. We tentatively have scheduled a briefing for the Council's Utilities Committee on December 3, 1992; and, if concurrence is reached at that meeting, we. will present the recommendation to full Council on December 7, 1992. It is the intention of staff that if the schedule included herein is generally able to be met, then we will be able to lift the moratorium as currently scheduled on August 31 , 1993. This opinion is based upon the fact that, although the moratorium would be lifted prior, to completion of the interceptor, we anticipate that no large scale development will come on line until 'after the initial peak wet weather season is over in May of 1994. This allows for completion of the interceptor as scheduled for October of'1,994 which will accommodate that year's peak wet weather period. Upon determination of the preferred alternative through Council action, a mitigation document will be prepared in accordance with -SEPA. This document will set forth the requirements for mitigating specific items identified to minimize the adverse environmental impacts associated with the construction of the preferred alternative. This document is issued by the City's Environmental Review Committee (ERC) and will be subject. to a 20 day appeal period. Upon completion of this process, we will begin final design of the preferred alternative with the goal of meeting a start of construction date of October, 1993. . F„e' hy Keolker-Wheeler/M ers of Council Page 3 East Renton Interceptor - ect Status Report. SCHEDULE: ITEM ACTION ANTICIPATED DATE Final EIS: Adoption by ERC November 1 2, 1992 Issued by City November 20, 1992 Selection of Alternative: Agenda Bill to Council November 23, 1992 Presentation and Recommendation December 3, 1992 to Utilities Committee Presentation and Recommendation December 7, 1992 to Full Council Selected Alternative December 1 6, 1992 Mitigation Document: Issued by ERC End of Comment Period January 21 , 1993 Final Design and Permits: Begin Final Design and Permit February, 1993 Acquisition Complete Design and Issuance of Permits August, 1993 Construction: Advertisement for Bids September, 1993 Award of Contract September, 1993 Notice to Proceed October, 1993 Completion of Construction October, 1994 SUMMARY: At this time, staff's intention is to proceed on the remaining issues/items as indicated in the schedule. We feel comfortable with the timelines shown with the only remaining potential obstacles being adoption of the mitigation document and permitting through King County, if necessary. Of course, appeals of City or King County decisions could considerably alter this schedule. If for any reason you have questions or require additional information, please contact Dave Christensen at 277-621 2. Thank you for taking the time to review this information and for your continued interest in this essential project. C:DOCS:92-810:DMC:ps CC Gregg Zimmerman Attachment . C-ii;i4v, Idii,i„dpilt i Gil: '. 44„t__,,pt3 / fr-P (- /'S L- ee 40 '/ -- /¢V G 5 ieut, "\-- 9re.,5-7 I ,64. ,,... yros-7 , /, ),/745" , /-i-t 14-- oe,�-cketetio- o£7 , ,e;2-0/ /55' / _ ;/ '-fi, /, / , 4,0efrikt ,?r05-7 -. , 7 ,;, - ,, , 40 1 , R, 6-6Z2 / / / , e 1.-'/ 1,,,,To„ , o 77/4 /tom 1A-otateee-xl,i �0 ..5 75.-- /ti- f eo -7 /doe /& l!Zie- t-t_ 9'ra 7 . M4 '`' 4 gerldell - /'/G /.5-3, £— - : le"(-r-"A- 9r0T7 . . GI * 1-. � 1, o I,iz . . 14 .. 1 , t -_- t s .._ g . 44.i HaroldAReynolds Ken Crossman Willie Velasquez 13016 156th Ave. SE 13613 139th Ave. SE 14134 142nd SE Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 • Roxann Re olds Kathy Collins Robert C. Jones 13016 Ave. SE 14110 SE 141st Boeing Comm. Airplane Group Re n, WA 056 Renton, WA 98059 PO Box 3707, MS 70-14 Seattle, WA 98124-2007 CalvixWilburn Carole Harding Dean W. Tibbott P 13826 SE 142nd St ` 14243 SE 146th The Tibbott Company Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 17003 NE 28th Pl. Bellevue, WA 98008 r- 1 ! Erm: W. sum Ray L: : :..c Mr. Jim Scappini 13826 `4 142nd St 11621 ::, 47th Pl. 12815 - 138th Avenue SE Ren . .; A 98056 Be -vue, A 98006 Renton, WA 98059 Ruth Dorward Karl Goeres 14243 140th Ave. SE 13116 138th Ave. SE Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 • i Julian Sayers, Pres Marianne Manville • Gloria Olson The Sayers Associates;,Inc. PO Box 97304 401 Park Drive, Ste 221 1133 - 37th Avenue Bellevue, WA 98009 Kirkland, WA 98033 Seattle, WA 98122 Union '• : - Associates Bill & Sharon Arthur Attu: Ch-. • Henry 14236 140th SE 1090 ' 8th % --t, Ste 900 Renton, WA 98056 Belle e, WA 98004 Sylviaek Tammy Fossum & Lane Hale Alda Wilkinson 12255 1 d Ave. SE • 14228 140th Ave. SE Boundary Review Board Rento , W 98056 Renton, WA 98059 3600 - 136th Pl. SE ! Bellevue, WA 98006-1400 114/.1. f GeraldA ek Larry & Evelyn Holme 12255 142nd Ave. SE 13568 139th Pl. SE Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Ann Plath Jason & Liz Close •• 14004 SE 144th St • ' 13715 139th Ave. SE Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 i 1262.28(.436) i • Elizabeth J. Menzel Bill Hoxie Chris & Tim Clifford 13803 SE 144th St 13837 SE 142nd 2712 Talbot Rd. S. i Renton, WA 98056 • Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98055 I Brian D. Smith' • George Sharpe Mel Aakre 14805 SE 139th Ct 14227 140th Ave. SE 14209 SE 144th St .. • 1 Renton, WA 98056 •• Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 1 1 Dave Welghall Ed & Karole Evans Nolmu Fergus 2504 NE 4th St 13914 SE 144th St 13714 SE 141st St li Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98059 1 j Wally Christensen ' Joyee & Brian Sperry Mel: . - M.quin 13723 SE 141st • 14007 143rd SE 14021 1 .rd Ave. SE Renton, WA 98059 • Renton, WA 98059 Rento. • 98056 Al Sebastian Sharon Bakeraures Moquin i 14312.14-4th Ave SE , 13826 SE 141st 14021 143rd Ave. SE Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 1 • Rayral Kaji Sue Rigtrup Jay Anderson 1 14320 SE 144th St 14212 140th SE 14404 143rd Pl. SE Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056. DeLoreal Tonda Emily Johnston Myrna Busch 14204 140th SE 13558 139th Pl. SE • PO Box 2184 1 Renton, WA 98056 • Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 1 R. C. Jones Alvin & Jane Cluskey " Steve Wrigley 13920 147th Pl, SE ' 14211 140th SE 14220 140th SE Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 9805 1 Bev Pillo Ray & ,i :- ene G'::l Hi Niels I 860 Chelan Ave. NE 14306 • • .. Ave. SE 14211 146th St Renton, WA 98056 Re. on, WA :059 Ren n, 8056 Norma & Roy Luarette Don & v : ' en Hamblin 1441- 14006 143rd SE 13025 13; I E ' RaykNichols 1 Renton, WA 98056 Rento. • A 9: :. 6 14211 SE 146th St Renton, WA 98056 Puge ound Co ncil of City . Re, ton o m ti . Gov:rnme t Pare & R• reat. Dep i i ti 126 Fiirst •.ve. S. 1 11 Bron-in Wa •1 Se:ttle, WA 981.• • -nton, WA •:i 5 `y 7 Grea : " -nton . : ....er of : . and Ruth Brandal 1309_. I N y m Co erce Sunnyside Blvd 30t Rainier . Everett, WA 98205N -� • :nton, WA 9:e r. '? - i Ty Ribera James White ` : �' 14829 SE 128th Street 4222 NE 19th Street i Renton, WA 98059 Renton, WA 98059 f Craig Grueger Cio enton ; C-�,�:� ,.� r ''' . 1560 140th Avenue NE P Conimi- ion Jf�`' ` Suite 100Mil, f., O Ave. .. Bellevue, WA 98005 'enton, • •8055 r Cit •f R..nton Ci • of "enton r Attn: ` ty Attorney •.lice De.t. 200 'd •ve. So. '00 Mill •ve. .. Ren en, • 98055 •enton, • •8055 1 City o ' 'enton City ► Re., en r Fire pep, . Pub 'c Wor . Dept 211 ' •ve. So 201 Mill Av:. So Re.ton, • •:055 Reston, WA 9:155 r- I City o ' -nton City . •enton He: . .g :xaminer': Office S .•A . ormatio. enter 201 Mill 'ye. So. 210 Mill •ve. So ' :.ton, • 981 5 . • -nton, . • •:055 City of • • . on/Mayor Iss..uah ..ool Diss ' t 411 Attn: Ma;or's Assistant 56. NW Ho Stree T 200 Mil A e. So. Is.aquah, • 981 7 Rento•, WA 98055 I r Rento. •.i .lic Library Irene Larsen Hig..ands :ranch 12633 SE 158th Street 7' 291? NE 12 Renton, WA 98058 1 Re•ton, WA •: 5 Ren • . Pudic Library 5 M:'. Bran h 101 Mill A e. So. Re•ton, WA 9:e 5 { p • • . . • 7 ( 1 n Muckleshoot Tribe Council Valley Daily News, Editor 39015 - 172nd Ave: SE PO Box 10 • I Auburn, WA 98002 Kent, WA 98032 Duwamish Tribal Office 15616 - 1st Ave. S. Seattle, Wa 98148 Renton School Dist: # 403 435 Main Ave. S. • Renton, WA 98055 • Seattle Post-Latelligencer Business News 1001 Elliott Ave. W. Seattle, WA 98111 • Darlene Madenwald Wa Environmental Council 5200 University Way NE, #201 Seattle, WA 98105 • , • • \ •• , Seattle Times-Eastside Edition Business News PO Box 70 —•••• Seattle, WA 98111 - ss: -71 • / zL'C�✓ Daniel Potoshnik ✓ Mr/Mrs Bruce Osgoodby ✓ Donald amblin '- 13405 - 142nd Ave SE 13456 - 156th Ave SE 13025 - 138th Ave SE Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98059 Renton" WA 98059 J. A. Taylor / K L Waddell / P Koler 13319 - 142nd Ave SE 133007 - 142nd Ave SE 13217 - 142nd Ave SE Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98059 Laurie and Rich Lytle / Cynthia and Norman Green - Mike and Shirley Coughlin i 13205 - 142nd Ave SE 14128 SE 132nd ST 14126 SE 135th ST Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98059 Everett Wilcock ' Joe Riedi ✓ David Bricklin '- 11830 11830 - 164th Ave SE 13635 SE 135th 1424 Fourth Ave STE 1015 Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98059 Seattle WA 98101 Ray�(Griffin ✓ Paul Lindberg ,/ Russell Berg 14306 - 144th Ave SE 13836 SE 131st 14017 SE 139th Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98056 Renton WA 98059 Pooteu Jim Coan otri(k Evans Craig Landou 375 Union Avenue SE - #155 3306 NE 11th Place 10520 - 169th Ave SE Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98056 Renton WA 98056 A. Duffus Mr. & Mrs A W Gumser Mary Merbach 701 Sunset Blvd NE 13640 SE 135th Street 13732 SE 141st Renton WA 98056 Renton WA 98056 Renton WA 98059 Raymond A. LaBlanc Cheryl Henry 11621 SE 47th Place 10900 NE 8th St -#900 BellevueWA 98006 Bellevue WA 98004 Larry Brown Todd R. Woosley 261 SW 41st The Burnstead Construction Co Jacquelyn Randall Renton WA 98055 1215 - 120th Ave NE STE 201 Rento SEenton WAA998059 40 Bellevue WA 98005-2135 R8 East Renton Interceptor Bill Lusher C:DOCS:92-974:DMC:ps 14636 SE 140th P1 ace Renton WA 98059 - - -- _ _ c._ (= .- - - - — - - A -P i r---i, ?fIc 1--070 ---1,,A;;).;. Ji rya . r 7"2- 17-17 - 1 - g4.-/Yre.4 . — - -- -- 1 - r‘bD 54.1 ."Trr,"Zi '&. '.); - - ' '..1141-^ C70 M C-111-1141 - 9`Y) --Zrv-11 ' . - -- 4)6W)1,g11 Ori- r"4-e-Vd i- .* ,;-' 124,-./,,5.T3 -e---it rrr gVs 1 r,4-1,0-1?-3Pre- -Fsl- / -%!kiNlirii-bv _ri,h() • ci-0--"ID ro -Aimfnr.Argi--1 - - - -- - - - v.,„)._(4 , __,,. .; _Hs_ __k, ) , 92,,,_ _ r4,j,_ _ ,r,),(1. ,,,d.:kipihr,,, rt_ _ 0_ FT,,,I,_ _ _, _v,1 , --A-s._741 _ __. uni.&7..AAA .-.tv"n:p...-pg.- rw - - --; 0- --15-ti, - - 1 s.,,/ c,Tr_.9-11-7 -25Qarn2S ,e-YL.2--t_ iTe)- 0--arn, N-Fl_qv) cTy-z -4 - - . - - - --bpgj (,,:y_74. &,4101.- „,z7v.fi.---u.n..4-.Arit7. -- 1.8... ,0.-.-7 -_a7., -- ,.,-- * Tiir-, - ----erm-, 1 - - - - 5‘1?--u.Q..0 . ).. . ronriciun cl..4,1pry-vpd. -N. r ---Vvrifl - -,4;0- (13-ifit , -- -- - - -- ' __744,0__ __ --1-- --.. t_ _ - _ -Niv:ivip-m ----irT -gli-.04-13- .wld - n -1-- -e-ef,-4xx-- - f1-9-s. "- Nr-rvr 1 -- -. cli -7 - - - - 1-A-/Y -Zret''-14)- ryks )90777 -)-mv-v-90 - ?rv-.0 _ - r 'Qh\i9 eI3 -P)Ir -- _ -- - - rorn v-42-Nni -.- 414-JA-1- -,, (0,-- -.h-cA )s-5.s.q s‘ rr-po -41-, A,3\14)1- -- --- - • I, , , 104 •,_vi , .direlinAl ---a-'3_c.- --C-YrrC‘XAI_ I"AfSir 4 QtNnilirfrp -AC.I . NWINO r..Ft -- - - - --- ' - 44,f.1.7 (Y) : -, .5,1 7 V V-rY ,s6 y-T-1-sd) (-T-Q. . roxy401 1 rappri - .K. IFF? r-zy.f \A:,-)-v---pni - __-_HIT-friv- rrn-r-6 Tim c- s-Toto- - - __ ._ . , v 11 --- ----tycm- -y14-A- -,i- - -- 6.- - r 4 ih.,,-3 -4.17-.-1m4 vrir i,.-,? -.,- rzil - - Vo-? .. 1 '117---- • --orc4-9---od er --i-lei A-Ame-a-zrA) . .e-v-ir-i-\% /ArNA.(2) — - ' 1-\;A - - - --- -—- . - ----1 -- .T. -- -- -- -77.- -- - - - ! - - - - -1-. rT,v‘riii) 717 ..111;) ‘A/.9,\JA 0-rr_., rfvf_ --)o-S52Q- , 1 11 - -OS)A-) CZrrir) - 914.-010,Yrnr -fw-7--0.. 9.-9- gr'' (..rf) --irr---Qr vAs --Trf- --11- - - - . - - TS4P-dd tra-?-0Nrrbra-sPW 'p'-el ( -/-9.-teartlAil N-AL- -vr-D- 1 --D-0- • ,-a-‹: Ay..-L - - - Niz.or_944.0 iyV - -- en - - -to=c- ,riziJ - --- 4-- - - - C-'AY -- - 'Y 37 '-1 - L-- ------- - � �K\\�� _ __ ._ _ - 76-- ___ :___1_ ._7 1, _.__ __ __ _____ __ _ -__ _ _,_ __L___ ____ ___ ' 0 � �� �'� - - - ' '- -'-- - -- --- -- ------ -------- '-- '' ..1 � ` - - -- ----` ---- - "\i-- 2 -p `1� `` ����� 4\M 1 -- _---- _ ' - ' -- ' - - -_ __-'-' '__ _ - ._- _- ---- --_- - _ `� �� '' ~ °--'� "�- mT » � -�ik �- ~� _~ -- '---- ---- - ---' -- -- - ---'- - --- - -- --- ��^r� - ' - - -' 0 '° ` '^�J q��. > -�~l 'r"�� \ » . . ~' «��, �~� 1. .1 i '�~ � | , - . �- - . . /7/ } ` -�_ \ .-j- --&c- • A I 81, a-AL Lar-Q-eQ (14-LCZA, 01 • 41 e)-6 ag--0j‘ co,i=k azAiL. Lef LoLizy„ f>a•- k 40-S' ctoNg4 it\toNt\a_. 4t:h AN.-10 \--11: \ AiYA:4; ti64.10-J.\ , na,,' vke,, Q, t}L01-6;ti -762-PZZ_4/_v_4-, cr20-t)QA Ss2Awkf\ aof AzeLp cilfeiz-1-Q1)Le, s_vv,ika flist/Z, AyeAis3u.6 t9.)-L-L Le„-A/\ &u,v2,d) E24 uc,„ As_6<v_ 00-6-A.z. 9,D elAp11_, AuiAxxil (-4-t-c;:tu:1 kpta clitA k. = ei)c.)._e_ tAS Diie 264 Mat1)-12-zw-Q,0-& te47),kk cikh ' _ AALANZ _ prwtc.16-A_Le,kk ------ ----- -- -- - ' P U b't)--t)1/4-if"'tth" nAt )•-et-k& ()u , i(o.u.263 div,e3c ----�-------'--'-~---- x-r -- y u.ArLaei ounio Lisigi . • ' c3,-9,e2- .<:_ . 1.),,,N,c??„rsg‘-,--__ ______049_. _.tr,k. , OLLeAist NTAI2A,Q11-641 • __. _ _ _ . . . 76:1. 1.' i`t,________ _ A-_-_,k)_ .644_ i_t_a-•__6= __s-p)cl-Pe^_. _-()_ _ , _.__ _____ ______ c&f.c_t. t..t1_ _ ,„1..,c (3,„Ad,__(\rN__Lt_o_4_ __tris__L_ ___q_44pazuNA _ _ cuy ±k * 1 _ ,_ _____:____________ _ _1_4NQ,--____R)_ _ _ ., U. 6--t - ' 4 ' ' .__,_S-t_ __10., 2 ____ __I_ '_ __N_n_. 1„...a---A, t I - ___2, _____________, ___ ____-_- :A:kA7c_ _.-4 _ -__ _____ __ _‘). ' __0__ __,___i r(._ .).i isl__ ..eyv.L. u- __ ___7_-- A_,,__ --.314 _ _ _ _ _____ ____ ___ _,,,,.e ._ , _ ,_ _ ._ __ ______ ____ ozkis:4-.. .._w_44.-ts - 04z., -4 _ -.. . _u-1_, 1,_N 1-ft-6-nab Ilz•- c, ___ ._ _\.).117_ ,,t).2:.A. jkv-pub-o-e--' e-e)- C.C.kr•A___ ,.___;liN ...__._ti- ___Gt)__Api_ _Jlow_ _It: _ a.N1 A.)-4W___,9)7R--. ...0 P AeyclAk _-1c-o _ . .0-)-,,,_11 cuyi_v_ 4._: f_legv_., _, _ _. _ _ __ , ___ __ _ _____ _ _mr___e_.,_m_L-z.;_4;__A6e,-L%A c.r,rail,k-- carr,.A/ e, \,._ _______ :- __Ap_4JrLy_,) .__ _.„ __ _ u•i_Nciov. y-w,a),_tic-34- . -_,t-- --a.- ... _J__ ukter.411 fu:1)_s).-i __pd__ _ _ II , • \'14(I'S' 1 c.rk- Nu.a. st - _ _ __ _ (Reps-r-- Wct 9 s so -_-____- ____ '.. . _' -_--_-_' ____~_� _--____ _-_:'_-- ___- -____------___-_. '-_ --_______ ' . _- -__' _ __ / ' _~~ --- ' ___.- -- _ - - - �_--_--_~�' ~--_ --___ - -- - ' __ _____ ___ - ��� 7��/` �.�'� .,__ ____ __ _____________ _ ______ '- - __ _~ ____-- ' - -"^- ____ - _~_ • ���^-�._~_-~_~�~_.---_~.-~-_-'_-_- __.-' _--_ - -- -_ _-_.-~�_ - - _ - � � - --_'____ - - - '--- __ ' _ __-°- _' - _�__-- __-'_.-__'� --_-_--' ___-_ _- -- _ '_- - -- -- -' -_ -_ ' . --_.~-`~-. '-~ ~.--- -- ---=- ~~ __'-_~^ ____ - ---~-~_' ----`-_~~-,- -_ -- _ - - - _ --. ' . --- -_ - - -' __ .._-_'_-_' _____ ' ----_ -__-_'_ _ --_'-__.-_- -_ . ' '' . - _-- -- T / 1 i .--• I. 1 i 10Atik-al vux.,,),-. ‘LI-11q-a . . ir 1 i . ii •,. AAdtYfriki Ltt,/,----6- fi T1A4 (6,-) 4- i....( • . vi ._ b-f-ri•Q_ atti d2 ,.._et"...k._•,,u)\:--41-_) v...(4 77L \ c. .si__ A .--A.0 gk''cA-Tv•-' Pc)-6)41 -x-, 71.e.0 LL,;. I\ .1('\' v\c- Cz-tJ,v,ilv\ ii. 1 4DAue , ov,-(\\ N.sh T) Q.. (:?1' e , - __...., ( i ( LL Ccv :wk. 1 1 ( 14,i-kAi-cL, --sc- 4.Adt,A4L-1_,!) --&-rad."Q ?, k ' --c.S- 1.'64,‘-4.- ___ ,..i ,. q,15t17--T1j- ) . ,,,,,, ,.., ,i... ,/ L. Ze_.7- ? ( , ,i i336'7 /Vz /,---'626,tf, :....z /9.:„.-.A.7.;_, i, e..,5/' , . /,•,, (3 / i 7 / _ S& X0 ---:, / zg Y:_l ,)7••• 76rein c , / -cs /9 z...-1.)a .4 Tr x e... rz.,E,t'7 .-Ii tr: I i // .. ./. Li i t) , 1 1(/ 114./Utu ... ,r_u_ , /4/2-5 ,56r/_-_3;2/0 -51- 'red tor) • , - r yez52 ----) 9// k._5-44 /3' '-,--41 s 7- -/ .-7 -4.-76----r ?Fos'i :.. ., e&A- .zetii___-\_._' . it_10.6 S C- I 357''.57 4., :,-'4--;„ (). .,3i .L . c,i_,,,__ /'-(L)-Lc S L / 733-±1`- .Tf-. k't..d-c•=1-1 -/`-6,=-5? ' ---)---. ./i2.4:41) . argL ,b •: , ,c4f,-t/1/. /3c2 r / 1,3 4v fj A4)-?),) 105.7 51-)cd1Ale-s 1.(7/e-a-: ./.,-. e t,z-z.../Z-ei--: Azeii_z /3L5,? /y5 ,--„1-6),,, c-ird 5ci /3 l'&6) -134-(le. 5,Z;, /7 e Ai I.iii- 9 s,c) 43. Z‘(.3 /g 3 /7,e2 A v 6- S E- , /3 Y77-t •-r- 'Y c-s'-el . . ( 1. . t6.;-/A/Z1 /3i-5-/S / O'h6iSZ-5-- (1 . • x......,0-.. ., IS0,111 Pl1-44/( I.3'Ns' /`f,2,-, Alif-a-- c -E- . 11 _ I / . . • I I I • I 1 • • • i I• 1' • I, I! I II 11 I• ;• • • .W? Ar?nrira-7 Itz:N/YY)) fT(.3 I . • (1)_A-VRZ5-2] r—P9.4-11 fir1tri irrA\s 1 ) rrIC:9 I 1 1'v: • ••!...' ez : > / - c;(,Q.,r,,,„/„, .- ,January. 11, 1993 Renton City Council 200 Mill Ave S. Renton, WA.. 9.8055 Dear Council Members; We have the good fortune of living in the area east of',enton; We have made a conscious decision to live here. due to the.. semi=rural athmosphere. and, we are intent upon. maintaining that living environment,. We believe it is entirely inappropriate for the City' to try' to solve itLs sewer capacity problems at our expens.e.:, It is. a very transparent facade to say that .people will not'b.e able to hook.-in.. We are well aware of the unfaix method of annexation that the City always employs wherein no vote is allowed by the people who live in the area to be annexed. The only time you put an annexation on the ballot, it was resoundingly defeated. We suggest that you solve your capacity problem by building a line located totally within the current City limits. (dE_ A-L-St conk_ _Inv orfoS/TW®N 7D I-( £&4 /383 SE 13/sr Michael Nesler pe�iz a_,e' , r I'( ,' 13015 138 Ave SE e on 98059 tiv y�T/, " . _______77i ~ r ; ,,�;9 4-/L--(-------- 1 KY- J � i..-4 °s�" ,,_ /3e8L ) 3(s� ,, ,1 r „,,a„ ir3s4y SE iv s+ Mike Hampshire / ; ;,/ 6 ' '4't 5t 13?'e ',r- i-/- t 7,/ 14 ,. (z/4/(0114? a k /�� .9 /5/g1- Linda Hampshire 13625 SE 131st Renton 98059 / f' S •W %. �4. . '`, 1'3 EI /3 j � 6 arc /3/i6 /363Se 911 1 .3- f5 5e, C3 Zlkd • L__66,2: X / eie,z_� l3//(,—/3F1 AveS �tQ, • -�( W4 y /37.zo /5e-40e4 4,.,,,,,p4 . AculA'—, ,,' cao p, A Wa() 56 13 ;1 S ice . J-1 % , R/, A / •9 s7 77k eti)<_. SP_ ._1,C,,,,,e , ra • EAST RENTON SEWER INTERCEPTOR January 11 , 1993 After reading the information made available by the City of Renton, I find the Comprehensive sewer system plan states that a substantial percentage of the system has reached the end of its useful life and needs to be replaced. These areas include the Downtown, North Renton and Highland areas . The Highland Area is defined as the area bordered by I-405 on the West , Renton-Issaquah Highway on the North, Monroe Ave . on the East , and the Maple Valley Highway on the South. The sewer plan also contains provisions to widen NE 3rd and NE 4th from I-405 to Duvall Ave NE from five to seven lanes when the Highland sewer is replaced. Both of these needed projects will by necessity require traffic disruption along the very same route as Alternative #2 The South Highlands Interceptor . When the above is added to the fact that , in regards to the staff preferred East Maplewood alternative , The Newcastle Community Plan specifically forbids sewers on the east Renton plateau and the King County Comprehensive Plan staff states that it has not been determined if higher density is appropriate for this area of unincorporated King County as yet . It should be clear that The South Highlands Interceptors entire route. falls into the area of already proposed and needed improvements , and the East Maplewood choice is premature . Should the Council be -. leaning toward the Maplewood Heights alternative because of the short duration of traffic impediments on Cemetery Road, please consider for a moment how many times the streets in that area will be torn up in the future should the East Maplewood Interceptor be installed, . and how many years it would take before total build out and payback. It is much easier to cope with a one time lane closure on a multi-lane road than it is to have hundreds of closures on small county roads as homes annex or hook up. Who will pay for the two mile interceptor located outside of the city limits , and who benefits? Is it possible that by locating the proposed interceptor outside of the city, and then declaring that area a health hazard to the aquifer , county residents or the Federal Government will have to pay for most of the costs rather than the city? The FEIS also states that when Renton upgrades its stormwater facilities with bio-filtration, no mitigation for groundwater impacts will be required, no matter which alternative is chosen, this even includes the no action alternative. G�QeLu•C- Page 2 East Renton Sewer Interceptor It has already been determined , by RH2 , that the aquifer is not contaminated by 40 years of septage from the East Renton Plateau, or fifty years of septage from the community of Maplewood located directly over it . Also , it is not expected that withdrawing water from the aquifer will cause pollutants already in the ground to render the water unfit for human consumption. The results of the Renton ordered testing of the spring below Maplewood Heights has proven nothing. I am of the opinion that the Nitrates found in the water are naturally occurring fromdecaying vegetation and not a result of failing septic tanks and I believe that further tests taken from that site bear me out . If staff perceiving a threat to the aquifer is enough to cause The City of Renton to spend millions to protect it without any proof or guarantees , what will it cost when they acknowledge the _ real threat of sewer interceptors lying on top of the aquifer or the effects of earthquakes or runoff from dense developments and roads running over it? What protection is there from chemical or fuel spills where the railroad crosses over the downtown aquifer? Are all of the studies completed or are there more expensive surprises in store for the ratepayers? Renton can gain sewer capacity, accommodate growth, protect the aquifer , lift the building moratorium, replace old sewer lines and widen the road at the same time without further traffic delays in the future, if they choose the alternative that fills all those important needs, The South Highlands Interceptor . As an added benefit , the entire system would be located within the city limits and not require permits from the County, thus speeding up the process . - ‘ • Ray Griffin 14306 144th Ave. SE Renton, WA 98059 (206) 228-5673 1302' 38 Ave. S.E. Rent.., WA. 98059 January 11, 1993 Renton City Council 200 Mill Avenue S. Renton, WA. 98059 RE: East Renton Interceptor Members of the Council: Referencing the four page document entitled "East Renton Interceptor: Selecting the Alignment", we wish to make the following comments: We challenge the conclusion on page 2, lines 3 and 4 which states that the East Maplewood alignment would "best comply with adopted land use plans. On the contrary, an alignment outside the City has the potential of decimating everything the citizens decided were of significance when the Newcastle Plan was designed through the community plan process. Land use in our area is set: forth in that plan; it has not been amended through the public process required for amendment, so it remains the plan for this area. County provisions state that an area cannot be sewered if it is not in a Local Service Area; the Platea'® is not in an LSA. In the background section, it is stated that engineering investiga- tions proposed. .interceptors that would solve the capacity' problem. Td solve that we urge selection of the West Maplewood line because we believe you need to solve the capacity problem with .g line'wholly within the City limits. We take issue with the statement on page 3, second item under West Maplewood and South Highlands alignments which states that East Maple- wood septic tanks are contaminating Renton°s drinking water. I'm sure you know that current data does not support such conclusion. We wonder if there is some unstated motive relative to the statement that the easterly alignment would result in the least cost per connec- tion. We were told by Nancy Mathews and others that people will not be allowed to connect so what is the relevance of the connection cost? And, if no one is allowed to cnnnect, how will you recover 86-87% of costs from new connections? We believe this is a dishonest attempt to spred growththroughout the Plateau by using unproven allegations to support a route specif- ically intended to accomodate development interests. Yours truly, Donald,E. Hamb in , r nn Mary Ellen Hamblin A4444-4- al-e;i2 - - ,C p u.G�,,/ der; /1/?z- 1-7C SGL //veGc' J` "-- D. Re1a ( DYL /(iL .l'L a fre R 11.0 w 1-d.! G� S . E a s f Revt P/a�e a cJ P) J Cl o ) o� Sett1 e w ycoern/.;, , ,l IAJr ! de, . qu - 1 `boy o4 A' a/l ocC h / J . / • c2. fr-u Ir c2 a !'e c? a o d_ . I S Lv'h UI / ve b e v e be se_ 1 .1417. ro +p- -at-4 i /- u //f ) o Pc/I- of eve / op e t s aki 6/ o71-1 d 1 -e 7L l h Se Ot -UJ o" )i ► 1 ?'V e- 7 l�. e k)Gj 4 • • iJ p k se Y' v e I � J u I/ `Ly oX- l/' -- /� /9XY 2 / J0265" — /38. 777'6. . /-v6 R '✓U7Y1.4//. 7, P59 C . CITY OF RENTON January 11, 1992 Warren F. Vaupel JAN 1 1 1993 PO Box 755, Renton 9805'ECEIVED Mayor, City Clerk and City Council CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Renton WA 98057 As a resident inside the City, I hereby express my opposition to the City using past and current ratepayers funds to install a sewer line in unincorporated areas of the County. I have opposed hookups in the past, even in what some term "emergency" measures unless the people annex to the City or unless King County bears the responsibility and the expense. King County in the past issued all building permits, some of which should not have been issued because septic tank failures sometimes happened quickly thereafter. Thus, King County is ultimately accountable for any failing septic tanks. Your own residents should not have to bear one penny of the burden for the maneuvering to get sewers in the County; yet here we have already paid for the study and related expenses. King County should pay for curing septic tank failures, if any. A sole source aquifer owner has considerable police powers which I feel could be used against King County to require payment for failing septic systems, if that can be proved to be a problem. Also, this area is within Water District 90's jurisdiction, and they should be asked for input and cost-sharing as they already operate a sewer line, perhaps of small dimension. That way, residents would have some entity that is directly responsible to them. As it is, you are doing things-to people who have no vote or representation in City matters. That's just not fair. According to information I had, present ratepayers will advance at least $600,000 to $800,000. Even if the City says that all amounts will be refunded by hookups and developer extensions, that's not good enough for present ratepayers who will never personally receive one cent back as all paybacks go to the Utility Fund. Also, the issuance of revenue bonds to repay the $2.6 million low-cost loan will mean that the present ratepayers will have to pay all or most the interest to the bondholders who buy the revenue bonds plus the full principal eventually. One of the basic principles of public finance policy for public infrastructure used to be that beneficiaries carry the burden of payment for such projects. Here, that principle is not used. Further, we were involved in a Federal lawsuit some years ago with East Renton residents, the lawsuit being based on Water District 90's request for funds to install the Orton Road Interceptor after area residents, as I remember, defeated a sewer proposition by 2-to-1 and later by 3-to-1. My point is that the bulk of the residents were adamantly against sewers, and I feel the City shouldnotbe dictating living conditions outside its purview until the people are ready to become Renton residents. A large number of those residents are activists, and with aggressive tactics by the.City, I fear the only way you can get them into the city is by dragging them in kicking and screaming at even greater costs. (Frankly, I would like to see that pool of activism who love their neighborhoods come into the city. However, unless we can get them here by good public relations and setting good examples of cityhood benefits, you should leave those people alone.) I think Councilman Stredicke is the only senior Council member who may remember the storm kicked up over both sewering and the possibility of putting roads or infrastructure down the fragile canyon surrounding the south and west sides of Maplewood Heights. At the very least, that canyon should not be touched. iYKAP`.G K�t /JO/( /5' "`aive,,A6 91osy o6ie . aZ� /q9z CITY OF RENTON a,00 . Ge . MS'S DEC 3 0 1992 RECEIVED letrzed~.."1: CITY CLERKS OFFICE &,ei .a t eta-iacif but .v ) al rdt, e"J .144+.1 -rte e4,yur. actAvtl- 2e4/14:44.4t 11/-44.& "teoe& .rte✓ C .44-0V-C11 J ur-Aitigi./t144d6 oel,QW f'4. .e. ��: i ca4 epi'e2, 1,e0 in1eezie4/..tin) i'1- 4,;;,a.e-cgt4rt} i,40A4z ,)1t,o_vete.7 e÷. 6.7k .74 g_ez,24t1iXa-vi ., • ��naa '�,����eivrxaff (-uer •-107t47 - ' ; /e0/� _ Lh R/Qy V/CKERs II i r3 q/ / 5 Lam' ! l ST 1 J End`TDN 0.14, 9 trO4 I - %; / 9f,.2_ : - .74-7.2., ae r . -e--4c-it' tr ./fe-t-,to-'• , . 01,1„--, _ _ . . .. ! :. _ . . . .. ... . :14- 937y01-e-w-e-r ,,pl -, rc..a..-4; . . . k.j/....EaA.4.-_ .._ - e . /• .A.g..., 4.41_e,,,. . ,.e....p..,, ._ . ._ . _... _ Lr-)i _ , . pi , •rit...a1-61--(7- o �' /, jai /' �4? � ' 111>&& -t-e, - - - t - i-r..e-v- irivt. : _ I/ ,:_,,,t, .6e,d/6..„4-„,, _ , ... _ 7 _ . - . . :.'4.6.r Zie_.ice' _n .. ., he, //1-4--el - . rr i /t e ALL `Z ..4< Z-,-1- 71/1X-Ze afe-CL. , . . . ... . . 1 C'9 4(.1(r. /4-/-Z el),,. X a L� j (J-1.1-1''e' (', 'e-)'Yyj3-d-' 4?--61f--Yt 16eFeY4- •_jae-1 te-sdep:Lt letA-e-- ICA-.8,-0,-‘ , (i.. /4.1_, ,ez_ 1( a, , . , z.,,L, - f0 idre Lh/t,tLG- < `1 . /- - -,'-- ' &.,..(fr_& 04;t_i- _k)-,„_, J-7, , CZ7 _ .( .. • 127,92;Cil / 7 A , _ _ . . --- • .. .. _. ,e--4f:. . ez„-rx,___ L . .p,:-L-47 ,g7t,-- .)4-71.64- q7,--a-1 e-a--- - ,f-20-9 - . .. 'i4/G...LLi ' 2.e.'•,,,e,- c/')- I.. 27 2/4_,, '4' �l . _ . jib— it_4„,,c.e, e7,4...e.,..." Aczt- _ ,/,_.6,,,z_z_._- .4- _fii,e—a..z.,-,,..., , -)1,',)'? — 6-v---t"ei-L-tf-11-. j. - ....._______-0-4-4-m--) (Kyt-d— -_ _� . ,Z4e._ , e, .L, _ -vim � ) . .. i . . . • . 6=LL4G, 4-,-c� . • - Ce71u: aQ .../) //)d 4 , A -7,---vv-vii --r-ir-r›,-14,77-• , _ x? 1,-0?-i .- -e v2 ,2 --gt 11, ,ite _-`64 - 26(v (:tz''A7-4-?i'' e / • 9272/2.�e '*77-71-7,---)7_, ---7e- / 40 -xe-,& - 4:7.:v -w '-'21---7 7,1/--V. 2 , ,V, 477--- -.-„27 ' , ,. 7 : :. , '--,. , ' ,2,7,7,7„._ '""P)-7.-p-le---, i0,----2-7:4, RZ-2,-(7-X-- - -p.-.7;2p•-yn,--71 , , _ . 4'1 --;ig 4''"--` . › ,-?..7,-,-;,..-2,, / ,11:24,7,/..v./771. ----'7 -27.-71421/Pe. ---- ' / -1, -7-17/ '-'7 ; -2i-7" / . --rhri.. - , e--/--PW/ - -V 0--)--rrvf)----- 7.rinra- !IY/-7- 17 --r-2' Pt--)-- .-1 - . (---257--rp,7,-):.--7--- -"yyy - ,A.,4, ?,--?7-vny --0 4-9-til -7,--2-.. - . , ' / (-c? ,27r??/ --.9'.7r-r?li '7-r -Pi-kvil7a' 7-'4'2' - it:a-4e „77,77.4,- ,c -,,),-,- - pr_ . - , { D. - . "7-2_,,-3._ re ..27,7 __.7.,--1, - ,-,....7z, r. , 727-71,,- 7- "-rip?, ...,...e_ _ _ _ ,rw _ ,___,7,. .x?„4 ,or _ _,..a4),2_7„_,,,e , 1 1 720,2„2.)4,7.0„ ___ _ ,,14..:2..2,7 . r....,. - , ' ` , / r .-:-� . H / - - ---).i r 7. i+-" �� - • • . GF—At (;;=O ;,!:1' n. 'Ilir (:A`;Y(;'•. !L 1'I.I:t'.U()?) GOLF Al.) CO;!N!*RY CLW: A: i) liS SU 1ALll.l .'i AS A HIGHWAY-ROUTE (PROPO EO J.35Til AVE. S. E. EXTENSION) - (Testimony of -A. D. Horn before the Kink County Council, March 6, 1972) . At the request of Mr. Larry Vickers (13419 S. E. 141st Street, Renton) 'acting on behalf of a .coni:ittee of citizens, I conducted field geologic studies along the routes proposed for the extension of 138th Ave. Southeast. - I appear here today at their request. to summarize my findings: 1. The proposed below-grade crossing of the Maple Valley highway is not geologically advisable. The valley flood-plain silts are • undoubtedly water-saturated and will pose expensive construe- tion and maintenance problems, including the installation of pumps. • Highway construction across a flood-plain should be on a raised berm or preferably a causeway and then only when no other route is possible. • It has been demonstrated for well over SO years that man's presence on flood plains is extremely tenuous and that roads and other construction on such areas will undergo periodic flood-damage despite our best efforts at flood-control. 2. The proposed cliff face route out of the valley passes through what the State of- Washington Department of Natural Resources geologists map as landslide debris (Department of Natural Resources Bulletin No. 63) . My field reconnaissance bears this • . out. This is both an ancient-and a modern slide area: M. 2 A road cut through this area will be periodically covered by landslides; the road itself will undergo periodic down-slope displacement, necessitating reconstruction; the houses above the road will be endangered; and the golf course and valley below will receive landslide and increased sheet-runoff debris (princi- pally silt and clay) . (in that this slope is already over-steepened and prone to slides, any alteration will most likely aggravate this condition. ) . 3. Although the environmental impact statement filed for the proposed road did not address itself, except in a superifical way, to the problem of slope stability and surficial geology, it does state • (p. 6) that "If clay is present, severe slippage could occur." My field geological studies indicate that routes up either • side of the canyon will be for the-mostt part in extremely unstable water-soluble claystone and loose clayey sand, silt and gravel. The inherent instability of the bedrock and soil is further demonstrated by numerous landslides (small and large), one of which is currently endangering the south end of the water-main crossing of • • the canyon. The valley walls are now standing at their maximum angle of repose as is typical of this type of stream valley. A road cut must, of necessity, locally increase the slope of the canyon walls which will then cause additional landslides and sheet runoff and thereby greatly increase silting in the stream below. Again referring to the impact statement, I wish to point out that while soil borings are often advisable for right-of-way studies, they are not absolutely 3 • required for preliminary studies in this case due to the abundant • outcrops present in the canyon. • If borings must be made, however, they must be done directly along the proposed routes due to the great lateral variability of . the glacial drift in the area. Also, such borings will themselves have deleterious environmental impact. 4. The proposed route up the north fork of the stream is extremely inadvisable from a surficial geologic and hydrologic standpoint. This stream flows in excess of 100 c.f.s. (cubic feet per second) during winter and abates to less than 5-15 c.f.s. during the 'late summer. • - - . • - This north fork route would probably require that the canyon • • be filled and the stream placed in a large culvert. It would • • therefore be necessary to construct a system to gather the surface and subsurface water and effectively de-silt it before putting it into the culvert. For hydrodynamic reasons this will result in increased- erosion downstream and further abet instability. • below the already unstable slopes. The alternative proposed by - the designers apparently involves the expensive solution of complete interception of the water and culverting into a storm- sewer system.- 5. ystema5. The process of urbanization (covering over of land) brings on an. increase. in surficial runoff, which is then channeled into storm sewers. ' Although not specifically retained to comment on this, I should point out that the storm sewers presently installed in the / . 4 it r arca are actively degrading the canyon walls where they enter the canyon. This is especially evident off 138th Street on the east side of the north fork of the canyon where erosion is.proceeding rapidly and will soon endanger the road. This storm sewer water should only be.put into the creek . after suitable study and engineering design has been accomplished. The best local example to follow would be the proposed storm sewer . . drainage into Piper Creek, Carkeek Park here in Seattle. I feel obligated to.point out that engineered solutions to the type of geologic hazards which will be encountered along the proposed highway route are historically short-lived, and- exceedingly expensive. Pilings, drain-fields, retaining- walls, and "rockeries" are typical such stop-gap solutions to poor route planning and insufficient geological information. A road through the canyon. would be expen- , sive to build, expensive to maintain, and completely alter the surficial geologic and hydrologic regime. . I respectfully submit, and it is my professional opinion, that this project should be abandoned for geologic reasons. • i A. DAN HORN' VITA Consulting geologist and instructor in geological and environmental sciences at North Seattle Community College. • Bachelor and Master of Science Degrees in geology. Registered professional geologist. Employed for six years by Mobil Oil Corporation with research in _ such diverse regions as northern Alaska, Washington's Olympic Penninsula, • west Texas, Florida, and the Bahama Islands. He also was environmental advisor to management in regard to the .Alaska pipeline and petroleum - exploration in the Gulf of Alaska. Testified as an expert on shoreline management, the impact of industrial development on the natural environment; and surficial geologic processes. (such as rivers and landslides) . . Member of the Geological Society of America, the Arctic Institute of North America, and incumbant President of the Northwest Geological Society. • • ft j K COUNTYENGINEERIt,G DEPARTMEr"" • SOI___ AND MATERIALS TESTING LABORA' L ` . MEMORANDUM . TO: Verne Ashley _.•December 23, 1968 _ i FROM: R. W. Gingrich SUBJECT: 138th Avenue S. E. connection to 140th Ave. S. E. =_ At the request of Mr. Max McGuire, this department examined the first - • 1,400 feet of the above alignment in order to try and make some determination concerning the optimum angle of repose for the soil material which would - be brought into a full and daylight cut situation during construction. • The proposed alignment is located- across and and. on the west and northwest' dip slope of the major drainage in the area. From the creek bed in the bottom of the drainage, the sides of the ravine rise very steeply 150 feet ® at an angle of approximately 80 degrees. (picture # VII) The slopes are t very heavily overgrown with ferns, alder, small brush, brambles and much down timber (pictures # IV, VI, VII). The soilmaterial in the existing slope on the proposed alignment consists of an unconsolidated sand and gravel. The sand ranges from the t The gra-els :mange . gust roars to very fine, ilii wase being predominen... _ from boulders to pebbles intermixed with the above sand. - The most striking _- aspect of this material isits softness; ;t is completely loose as far into - . the bank as one can shovel. The material is dug easily with the hands and walking over it causes deep depressions and.displacement as when walking , over a stockpile. The above soil profile exists from the creek bed to the top of the canyon 0 throughout the first 1,400 feet of alignment examined. . ' Drainage 1_ toward the canyon bottom wit' lerpendicularcreeks joining aV the main drainage plus water oozing from the slopes at many locations. Conclusions I : From what was observed on the surface along the portion of the alignment examined it is felt that the soil material present would prove most un- stable in the absence of the present vegetative cover. While the possibility —- of a flow slide is less in this type of cohesionless soil, it does exist and surface sheet wash becomes a major problem in these soils. : I The possibility of a flow slide in these cohesionless soils is considered I to exist only when liquification of the materialcan occur; the soil must become fully saturated and be in a relatively loose condition and be sub- , jected to shock, vibration or shearing strain (traffic action and vibration). For practical purposes, it is usually considered thatregardless..of its inclination, any unretained slope in a cohesionless soil at a void ratio greaterthan the critical void ratio, may..!be "considered potentially unstable if it becomes saturated. Picture #-II shows the soil flowing in the absence of cover and in a saturated stated The Orting Road cut (picture # V) will probably be likened to what ' can be expected in the cuts on this alignment. The situations are not similar. The soil in the Orting Road cut is a particularly cemented sand and gravel (strata no. I & II) within a slightly siliceous sand (II, IV). - The cementation of these materials is shown by their high angle of. repose in the bare cut slope and the marks left by the loader on the slope face in photo no. III. 1 The effect of surface or sheet wash is shown in photo no. I in a much may . _ • • In view of the soil materials present, pl-is the high angle of • repose in the presenLv. of a great deal of internal ____ surface water, . . - it is very difficult to generate much enthusiasm for the present alignment. • Even if the slope were materially reduced., something must still be provided. to restrain surface and internal water if the surface is defoliated, and . • " there is the ever present danger of soil movement initiated by external • . vibrations when or if the soil nears the liquid state. cc: Max McGuire RWG:dp • • • • • • • • • r Mayor Earl Clymer Renton City Council 200 Mill Ave South Renton , WA 98055 Jan 11 , 1993 • Dear Mayor and City Council Members: There has been some feeling expressed that the East Renton Interceptor is required to service the unincorporated area east of the city in order to protect the Renton water supply from contamination by septic tank effluent . This letter is the result of examining your data provided at my request by Lynn Guttmann and her able staff . Their cooperation is very much appreciated . Normal septic tank effluent would have a composition close to the following : Total P 14 mg/ I , Nitrate as N 55 mg/I , Fec . Col . 4200 per 100 ml . This according to a study of 94 units published in EPA- 6251-77-011 (Alternatives for Small Wastewater Treatment Systems) . Chlorides would be in the range of 70-75 based on data on the inflow to the Renton Metro Treatment Plant. In a situation where one is seeing contamination from septic tank effluent you would expect to see the foot print of the contaminant . You would expect ' .to see levels of contaminants to rise in conjunction with one another, especially with the chlorides , which is the lest likely to be diminished by soil , air , chemical or biological action . On the accompanying graph the total P value has been multiplied by 100 in order to get it into the same range as the other numbers . This exaggerates the changes . Conductivity (Cond . ) has been divided by 100 for the same reason . This understates the changes . You will notice that while there is occasionally a movement in concert the basic interaction is random . This does not support the theory of contamination from a single cause such as septic tank effluent . The e .1' ,/ fact that chlorides are only in the order of 15-20 rather than 40- 60 also works against a source of septic tanks . Further examination of the dates of sampling shows that the samples have been taken after or during periods of especially heavy rain on the plateau. In the five days before the sample was taken on 10/21/92 1 .62 inches of rain fell , in the two days before the samples on 9/24/92 1 . 70 inches fell after a prolonged drought ( rainfall is measured at my station at 11830 164th Ave S .E. ) . Similar elevated rainfall was observed before other sampling dates. This will tend to distort the data and to exaggerate the trends. Based on the data available (even at sampling point #4 , very close , to a development that has been in place for over many years ) there is no evidence to substantiate a threat of contamination to the aquifer from septic tank effluent . EPA publication EPA 440/6-89-002 (Wellhead Protection Programs) shows how reliable water supply protection can be achieved through zoning to preserve low densities , education and hazardous waste collection programs rather than expensive sewer systems that encourage high densities . I would be happy to answer any questions you might have and; to discuss these matters further with you. Everett Wilcock East Renton Plateau Community Council ...,..,7 • • ,.... ,. ., \--1 ..,,.. CNI J., x.. .... , cD.... ......- • .,f,. .„.. 9.......... ,--I .,..„, ............... . , ........ ,1- , -ci ... ...„ Nui• k .......... . : ........ A --..... a\ 6 ... ..•• , ...... ... .....,....... , ............. ,.: \ ... *:::::...... . -...._ , ..1- ...... ............,....... '''''' p—, ................... c, ,.....: .... ............ c) . i+ ..... ....1K II - •-..." . \ Cr) 1 / rli % ; \ , r 00 49 // H - N ......... 0 , I • .. . / ; . .. 4( .•• % ..r I C\I ,...... ; . • 0 • i' e--1 .• • • • • • • X 0 • • • 1--1 \4. , K ii .. . . c, c.) . ... .,„.,.. In *,, -,--4 • ../ i r-IN .•:, .i4...........,. \...................,... cq Z cn' ..........,..... ,, % . ,t„ I 0 CN ; ....„._ " 1- litl i - ____, t 1 1 0 kr) 1r) 0 tfl © v--4 N N 1---1 •,, se tz - ...-."..- . -.:• > •-. ..-tiL •f4L-;.f4 •:":-•---- 1 . rlsa:N__ . _i_...,. ___.5i T...., ie..,----1...' - , 7,_ .y....;-,,•,r•'' I,,iZ4..• ---.1... --7 T's-2 -'./6.=., i'--- - 7- .,. ...- T-7---‘71. ....C.L;11.--'77 -.„..._ „„ T ,., .._li 1.1.= ,.,.•.,,,,i si ItiliE 6 , ......,t;in...L. ,4.1 01- .,.. t.,,,, .... ..... .,=,•:? . :::.. . i. ..s.-agliyiF27 In -.),;14,-,17,3,,,,• .-..-_.,...,, r,,,:,, .e 1?..cAlt,,4 •••••••••,-'1',..,: ... .1* I > . cr.,::.> .n.,:::::]!..4.:.• 1 I i . I 1 . \i•• 12 \ cn '..'Z'S•• (41affe e -u, •1 ,si.. .1 .,.,Tli-slif....-•,,1,.- I,• 170TN ST di.... ' T. ' C'2 4 _.•4 TIT•:A.,..,,*4 :•;•,, . .p• ,,..„„),,,.‘ .,.::,,. 7 . •ji...71; 4.--!:,',1,,-....F':I,:'.;,':1 . ----- . 4 .St rA.)V..1.1 N S. ... J.NE.1,7T,r ..,., . 1,, . s, -iT, ,4•. ...,,,, . •. 17 ST sr . sf 120,14 Si I r.122T_u_s_T(' u•.;„A 1.1 ... '..1 4 . V I.'::• .1ct .-'''''''!i•diErt-•.?: :-.r.,...,p.., ,..L.,g s,-;1,, , •14,,,..g?..::)4i.1-..-;.; . N; '47 7. 47 ST :14. ''''-' .irre,..„1.0- '„ -,,..- • ... ....1:.-r., . ... 2,..•..:•:.. ,:,,'•t- 1,, x ,...-, . : coL,4,0 , f ''Pq"' . ' •' .•'-• '. -'4 ... .. : "81911M:.1;1111 . 'lleri*'l R-v,,t-t-;:i.- l ::.:..r...4 ! r- . , •• ; z.• . -• - ,. - Orts.- ' zsrivatri•Y- . ••,.--4•--,."-•\-,,--',•,,P4 ,,,,,.. ., - ri 1_,,•• .. ..,:-.. .,,,,,, ....._.•,1..„,,A,.-A, ,a1 -;,-3. :,...!.. .4,r,rre 3,•Piffi-7;...)....!:',.'',.:•Li•'4;c?),ki. -- .-..11........ i'..2. ...IE..::-. .,.......,,21:,' /-..;-.41.41i,1 .. • C r -.7.- ..;,.•,,,,,,L.,..4,•.: 1' . T •V ..i. k'44, ••-Lc,5 !-$-',i'if .: :„....t.,-,:t1,05...;,?,r,i,-,i..,,,,.., . i ;,,• •• ,.. ._,,,,,.....__,,/ N.,,-). .•.,,,, 1....,,...,.w .R. "ii•'..f.`ii. •14N.A.,....... a' , ..L . • :4,..,::,,, ,;".,:. " - . . ....e, , . -i • = .. .1' if,•0•• .. : '•,,.. .,...,,.,-N, E.-;,,, Di •••.1\17rn, - ,..,,,,,,,,,•,.1.-.4,.,...7,,.. > ,,• .i, - .1 .---, -P # • ••• `''' •4'.1 •'•'''''....,-,1, ,,.'TECH 1'6!.• '• '• A..-:.'4,:'.-',... '.:4'.,1'4:;..7,t•NlA.i,,•7,-;4;:.5,?...1 i .5 - -- -_,...,,..“j '0;..1--A.*: ' • et; - I= s • ••A,.._.,, '•*"'•":-'•ea;'..... ;491. •••• ''''-'41...,41..;'-'..''' '''''f-t -","'''-'-'....F7,..:,„7.:4-'-';'.7."'," 11" t--...7. - . ----4 ' ' 4-14...ir*Fr a- e:-•;::: ': -:--, ! -- .•Ls . L':- -.'- ---'.- 'L-••Lr--; •••••-'• • s ‘......; . ..____, e SEt , :,.„,•.,... .,..•:,,....,:,,,,..,.1...c,". :--.•-"..,.-.. ,•'<-,•••''••••L ', : . pf b ' . 4rif: I.• 11,i-1!..'-1 • ;,; SI'179T .ST Si V 1 i! ''!Dr4.'tV:' •' ''',.if...:., . is.... " .i ' ' ••‘' A ••,. .7.•?..., . %., ..m .., . .. ,...; „,,...,.;:...,:::...A. . :./...,.....,. ...,,: ..:t..„4„...r.,,,,,,„...1:,........:0„.1,...,.,.,...,....r •'113.P.,''..'4., • .. 4 ::,?..-1, •-...,1. -::•,, , 4.--. -.,, ..,,,r,..•:.,?.-:?.....,-;-.;...,:::.....;;:',;-..H.r.r.v-..- .....'..;-: , IR- ''T SE 131ST°ST SE 5 ' 1 :[;1 btt i.b•L A. , i• •r, • . DO S. , „, Si__ {ILP T IE 117/10 IT SE ISIND ft. Tut%sr 132„1:3 1 1 :?-!;•.4 - p 'o•-• 1 .........,,,i,v,..„,".,,..„......,..„...:....,,,..,..,,,,,,c,...1,..:._..,.... ,,...c.,.._ ....... . • , , . . ....‘.g '''' . 1 if/. .... .y's.'..,.•,•?../,....-4....:".:,.',.k.••.'.• ,-.-,13•••,;•:•••,••,....r.,.:;:;"• ;.'...,:tit,111T •, 7.,... 1 Ei :: X SI> 174Tn ST z SE 1 A . ' ' ..ti .di...41S: /KN.., --.. 4 I .:71.1).,Vouver.'...'•,!'":';','",- ':":.'.!.•i:::1:4.--1:-."'?:-.T'.; 'i'V:. " air .1..ff..,1:',.?_,;. .•''..,.! ...e.,j,',,....4.f.T.3(,")-:...:".....•...•:.-.:-.':''''':5,-,...-,'".1'.-''.''..',iis•.-:...,.-:'..'4, s ner•sr Z jsr d •1i z. t 4 . 4 r.. SF UST: t 4% ST milis i.i:v•Ikr ._,/_ _ s 13!T•ST .1-mt?, 4 • !"ijrz ,...., ,....0,,i).,E5....-A....y..,, i,-.1?4',. i',F,',•:,•.!::-..,,,..:..••','..-:$ 2.,..;x...;1111.•.--:-.'„1.1.?:.:.-:.,.:.'*-•,...:.4., .. . - E- ' .•MTH _j 4_ . -:144;:5., (ellE:ja "X,.'..cf:-.:1_774.2.f.:f.r.,L. ,i‘e.. .1...1i..i':.',"..11i.-- 51._--:', ...2;';'e-:::13:.t.;2'fi,ii.6t1'i!'2.34. 44,:s.'..- •-..W'f. ...,-''Pizt, 4-15--',...-- 1-7...-' ---12.'--57- $e 13T•71 IT: --67TTT--tr 1 •\ .., '..,-'' • •- -'' '.41'-',.;if7-7"Ti2ilikilZil•../..4i:V/Ig•q::ii7:::''-•. ..,''i;s1.11.-.N..!'.'•%?.1ST.'''11'.,•'.--I.:•:','''7.-:?;.' ''''' •:''.1 1 ..‘'is s SE MTH.el-.T, ; ":" ,. 0. ' ..;-.1`--11* ; '. • ...i .i.', -7-:•..-,":4. ••CEDAR•t. V4 1.tic,......tk-i''."••''..i''''(''''•-•.'",11%.,.....-'''fi,‘,,,,.`k-...4...,,,.,`"1,40,,Y.A.'"•...''.'"••',.'4.-,,..Vi • 't:'1.. Ilirl • ,-, R ?Pfifi;,,e.:' .1 ISSTI• • ..1, r Maill et. 8 USERS,. , . ,:i.,, :', t„-f...., .,i,,,,. .,,•-?. -,e,,,,,iy,„.-e:-'1';.''.L.,-..1.-,,i. ,,-....41i.-,'T, ..•-:•'''..‘I r'•••'•'..•'''''..."',,.•';'''Y IMP,,,''•O.' • '•-•' • ••••'Le:'••'.•"17..k.'....' •S'i .Ykr;"?......r7S,'.:.6.::i.'? ..!..;;••:&.•4;;;V'it%..:1:•'7.;;i 1'. ••':••,.:.;:;','1,..,•L'4.•••: F....1. •'''';..';'„i'4. TIME ji . . .,..... ...%, ..- --..f.,..... - . ..,,,,:„..-..,,,i.,,,, ,,,,,,...,,..q-±4:-.;,..:.?..,',-;•.,,23.'zz,f,,r,,i5,11,....\::::.4a*„.:1;2:-,i,:-..,-...-,/,-?:-.4.,i-,-- •.- , .4.0E. 40111 7 "sf„,,§, si 140 PI e ,,,I i. •4 ,... ; i4'• -.- i 1.-," . itiCij"---. ..5.,-.,:at,"...:•,ii -'.....,,,,i,..,A.,,,_••••••-. 4...'•'.. ..,. •--- i".' !-'ev './...4•5•1*.FP.1-'121:3''''.4'.:41 • , < ,.., ,.,. ,,„ISIS bALV.000..,. 'SmfiG,ITS• ••• ' . •• t ,.. i,,.1_'...,:',;!_i,'„',„ .,,,,,,V kit,' ,t:,zl.,,.... ...,r,-.,,,,.... ''',(1,,,,,,.,,.A‘4,-,1 1,,,,..,,,,,k44•44,.if,,,,: .. _,.:40mEttg. mu. .SE 141 T Ps. • 1 '4 ' 11;. .,,.psni i :'..,.. ----q1:,.. . ..-------,k,--.„ --,,,m.w...,..'•••Iiiittz;'..f,f.'.:•it'.5z2.17..:!•••---- ' ..1:1=. ii1R1ILIM115113 _ _ . ..x6..9--? . !. ,,-.: ••• .'..:.::•L•..,?..•:tElget:I.-2.... .E1 Az:,•:.i%V.F.'-'.7.1 .-,-, • , ''"&;^- P..'rk ../"--1a5:1.1iitii '''''''? ...--- • z i ST .-.-- .. V.r.r..c:K..c.;:•;111 I.: ::',1,•.:C• :31; ' ' A •'' -.'''- • ••,,,,. . • .. . , z . ...,-. .,-.,.:,,._-,....,, .,,,,,..5..,..-k„...A.,,,,,,,:,.=,,,,..,, ,,,-A.-i4.--.,,,,.''...:11,-, 'v ''...'..117.7.:5•?. `cn:tt",,.-,....,-.% .--- 1111 0 IIRD PL 1 SE MAD PL ' i Zg 1.3,101 TST MAP a e ..t!.....- ai-itt.‘,•!_, ,!,,,, -..iiv-ek,rzt-i.,,,,,,,,,.....;i:,:of,...J...q,,..,,,,..,,,....:.,,,.: c.,., „ . -_,,,i.,....r.,,,,,, __,,,,,, PM% . Api-g?,,i;41.„,f4,4.,,,,..-_&1-,,,..-:,,,,,,,3..-;,:. ;,••••4!,,,z,,v,••,7.4,-.. --,1-... - -,-... .,!,:y....,,,,,,,f,,,,;,,,pi,p.p.9.771,,,,,...,,,„v7.7-3,,,-plirli_, ii, ,..,,..,:i.*,e.,:p.-ii,:,--..,0- Blinailikst;:a.,,y,,,,,,,Itit-.4,g4„,,,,,,,,,-„,1-•,,,,,,,,t,‘,„...,•-_,:••,,,p,,„, -.::-6.,..,44;•,N.,,,f,R,trir.:*•/,•45,••••?,--. • 1.-, . ,. ,...,:,;._ le°;%,7i11.•„. ... ii .:a .: ,.r, - .. s.,,,,.'s.1.1,..---„.f r1A-1 ',...giAt,g--4I4..:_, A0-'1'),...:‘,-74:71,f',;.ii,pi,',i,•fly-... - •••':V.;•;',,;...!.. .9,„...,•F..i.:(,•;1• 1' . ..c. ,1s6TH 5, ,.. i I R -• 1/4TH' ST • ...;.. - ' ,iii.-1 x.' i;•It:0 -arr. p Mil, SE ° "' `•' ‘.2 I ii . ill .4 4, f a 4 s .., ---_-..-----'_1_•-,-- - t- I ;.,, . ,040.ric,,..,f, ri.:?;.?1.141.;,,T,,,,,ItikT, :;7',-N':-...ii.4.0,...-.-,:,Aq X,•:......r.,,f;•.ISV.??,-:P.•i:0 „'.' A\‘' '•?. 4. •,, i at Z., ; . F I " 9 i'.1 ...,..,,••,i,,,',-•if?,,'...,,,,',!-?•,,x.--.4,4:1,1.•",n,:!:'.,.i.T.‘;';:y."1,11'. ---•IN 1 .-,,,y.1.4.1:,.. ..-?„:,--:' '. .-- -.1.'"'..iiiic:,,,..ii-51•: ',,..4ta7.0../Ak.....,.\...........7-:.- ,' .T.=.tr- . "n, 51 is i • .: i . ,., l' '- ''slt?Iirtkatta....ttyll.41:n il$.1101. '4 5•'..."-A'.'ir:.::'..! ..,,'::l.:1(;‘•.Ak.,:.:i tii.':;',+1:_//c4.S‹...!: ...--F::•:•?..-;`,-.1, ..1'.:4',...:-Z;'''Z',"- .`00,0:4P ''' t. 5.417c,Tregf•;'. , ..;„...a,•_;.• Jo, r- g i . • r Y t;A.... •, ....aur A .1,,-..- k 1• -1;:r..-n... ......; .7 •-•:::•::..411:.'11 ./..,-C.s.T. 0 •',\'.',.'At:- ...yr.;'-•-.,,,,...2).•-v. • o, 4111-:.••,,,.. •k •"-,..?•47i.:,1:-.'1 e P -- I .1 a'1.." •.‘ - . L.) I* • Ts '17;F.,_42,4 11 T.;z-; ........ ,i•.',...''.i.:-z.,..,.,:-.2.1:-.,"....N;"•••• -.'.%1,,,,"I"f V•it'-''''''74', :fif;75,: Voo:ob •*.;Ally ..!4'e'L 04.4.441•:? ,..f.;,.... ,1•3-,p.: - it L.:1 , i .-.4 e 60+ ' 4,..,4i4,1::.;:e7i, :,.. '',7..i.C.,;..:.1.;',7,...•'::.i:::'..f.;, ,..,,.-.).-,-,...*:.,.c...,r;.,,,,,..5...a,k., ,,•.„ - 2 . e•-....,_,... ,, N}0 c44‘st%ilif.:.1A.ii?-.1.?,90:FRERA,2• r, .., v .F...,',•!:;;•• rri...,1,,,,,, -:,....,. y..-4:v.-..r.---,:::4-',1-:::::;,-*L-.7.\::1!;I : -,...\-4J%;.i.,-:,' w :' .::),.ri:P. :...;,.::.:, . if'ill? ,i, 1. ------4--444tIviii41,..ligl.,I ..N. .104,e, 2 1 i '''';•.44 ':fiF,V•r1.14;.‘•,•• IJ•tnr;! ••.,' •••••1:.i';':i.Ii?''.,..,-,•‘••:-1..P1.::•,;•E.''q,i1:V;it's,..1. A,...". '• 1,Tho•A:,. 4. 0,-.`-},........ r.,‘,P.. . i 1 I 22. t• ft,:.4),/,.sr;- r z. s . '4,. 4'. - • 23 1 RD ..lifii 1 ,,;•,;•4 / .q.,py.pgh.,; • 1.41.t,'i ...;.,7/,!t,''..,"i:LCV?'/- ',,,','"Cd.;Gt.r.•-•..\ ...-ri:‘..s'•4.-." i W.;it.' ''‘. r": '''.'4•,' ' 4__ i I /- CD ,. -.--as--A..-- ,•1:,., 4.•,. ,:',4:: '.- , .g 6 ,. '.- .•,".... -• ---\ 2i_-__ .! •• -rr112NDIST n: ./..‘k....°./?-ti,:?5e-i...01. : 1.''.' 1:',::';:,Sl,'. ;-• .--30 ,r,.. • ../, e 4 -§ .''.‘'':: • -' 1.'`' .' ': 24 . , o5 -- f.- -•• .1. -14•1,.4.;"::11,-„A -1 co'D ..• ....r"74?..."•,':•••• •''' I.C. '• • .'''' ''' '',...,,,ift '4.,;•q;1/4.•....";."4.41. 4',,,,.•.s:'e• •s.-- - L•- - -',.„ i. r 1 0 ceo.R a3›.. ,,•„f1 , -,,,;-?,,sj„ '.,„ ';4'4", ,.'.'.' .'t . •I I •••RP/ER' -‹ 41 1 • •'•'OSI.1 f ........:,',:•:„ ,'S; '1, ••rn;'',-,..•..'Cli. '''.. .4;...- , ':.P1 q• .6' ----1 ,_rt.. i,:i..--,' . ,..LT -.••••• t. ...i. ..-i. fr„„„„ z•,..,'..,.,,,, .... „ Ei , .,s: '''). • , I A' 8 8 . -''Aii.f...'".:• 6 Vi ,..„ •,,...t.: •-, I.,rei,,,••••;,4 t...,/ ,..,0 1 •L'k•.4nP'.!'•:' :':l,.. .‘"" 4•••1 1 :44 0,,''''', 11:',1•7),Iii.,:''''an, '4...4 I ta - ", i .',i,7_, 'iv..,..,zy.th-ip..-. .., ,1/4...„.„,• ,.., „...4 ..,.,_,. , •, „1., •..‹- •sn,..,..„.,•,....i ,,, ..„••••„,- I 4.'' •s.,.., I -.I 2 •A'14. *f•!:•..v.-. 'arit•41.. 3), • A g .- ... , . r I 5 J I• -,i'l -;2-11.1 v4.• '•'•••,'`TTS ' !-;;•.;;'...;1•575:00.1.e•' '.','.1:: ::;••..' > i''.. .44 ••' .!3:/0 ' • FAIRWOOD vill....1._,_iii1=: ...___ ''.',....1.11,1. -,,,,,,t..• , .-•••.,c,...---•••1:. . =-•.... Sr IfOrm ST C•SCA.P.:•$ v P. ,.tb, Tf 1......... . :1 C.:.,1.......‘{• •.:4.2$:,. .........,.(p•:: . .i, • • AAR-4„yi• ' ••/, St• i 4.• ii.aii c" , LI.: ,..7. .., ,,•-v ,,,,t : I 6 s''' -.....5c.:‘„.,.., . ST II T 8881 88 wa.r.,....,,SE 1Sa 4, I ., __.,.. t. :,,•.,,-,N:::•-:,.1A .4 ..; ...i.C.V1 i ..- .. : 1 I SE 141ST pL 4 lum 1658D ST ,2.e.SE 160T11,1;L.4., Lt w ,I1, ‘,..,4' .t'''• .. :•'•••11` .,C&Ti.Z.4..... ! ‘ if;It •'r...1 •'•.. i(•!..;.4'El a,d11 OL t. 4, L4in s • 47 ,., i • . o ,r-.7r-;.7. , u 88 '.' 4eip-7,;;;;brni'leirol '154 6.t:4 -SE-444TH---7:-: -ST_MS'aMnin 1 T a _.-. . , , •,,,._ •....i6,.4 ,5 - -'-A1A`,4A,,,... ,,,,,,.,...,...0•,,;,'. > •-x:'•;",,! L 3 .4.- ' .14iihM.. ; •..4.,e,„•x-,qk,,ilti tTg.1.41 ITEM!, -t UrtiS M.1"1/ 5 °., i'1 '41.",,-Elf.' '4°17. 1 ;•..1.13:14 " SE 1.114 lg. ,1,,,,.s, ..,_.0- ..1-,x1-....74;,,,•e7., : T, •OT' S 1613711 ST Pi, 1E, ,••3,;( A'4°0'al /...-- . •,,, • .,-,4,-, .4%.„ •• -- .'-- N . ..___ f.„-k....mtl. -•:1.1 Ili,ST Til 4 -I Sf 41G(T7/;17.•F tlielli''. '''''' . IsTru sT I 4.•." ''':''4'3> .4''1 ' I ••• ''3 .•.4' S.,..." b1 :.L,,T.PIII ..s,.,,.....-•-'.2: -. •2 .• . a e e. ;' Nks v. 4.1a• ..•,.., "... 1 . e ,' •*( ., ',mg, SIT '''. ` I i,..es,c,,i S','"T"'L 1 6..',...f,'d.>;.: ... s ,, .. I I-.• I . ,‘ ,. j... t ' - x:'.1 t L I . . ST a._ .•, _ ss.11 m.a ,,s -• - I . .,,.. . . e '.• • , 't* ' , 4 i'","-• „ 2 5 11,`,1:4'.,1•41i.,;,',;`,•krr,;•,,,I; 3 Lu c; Ln - [5 $ 4 .27, . 4.. ' . 5, 5; 5,4. . LS 1- „,.;':.;-„, P„,DI ..., k...IQ, '',-,ti- ., , ,-;:•...:1r‘160TH ST ...' • •• g.0 1...- r• .,..'..e*V;'?f)S.'':•1;i'1:6i I SE 169TH ST 1 ,.t, . -e e ..„., ,....,,„,t,,,,,.. . . „......„ ;•.,. : „ , ::. , 4, ,, , > > 1.. 9 I PL : ,.,....) .f, ,..,•-• I :,.,,,, ..,..,...„.„:,...g ,,,, ,.,,st„ ,.,.. ir,,,,,„ , , ... • .L ,s.)..,...'W.',...,1 i v,,Q,"s' si R. ,;,., .sss + • py : .1.,• ViZIE %.1-.;.,"'",::::" ta si ki, •,..,..;:•.‘-.,:. 0• ..',..'•••••••',-,....,,z- /.... .i.-si.., ., A,2 51 h IS .a. z , 91 4-,.----f'., .1-2'....... ..,..".1:;-• ."1..S"..'.. %. 1 op e'.."1;..-1.;:..•111 ...., ifiriA,.;,,,,,r,'''...• • \ . . '=' - ,. 8 S.E,-.2.e9., .A..-::';" I,,'..Sq!,,....i,••i:,••,..:-.; •-..•••,-;::....C..?...',...t::1,......? "Ist.1,•, ,,,,....,!:„ I , • •••• ' „... L n‘sal ST •••'.. ST tnNo ST.' ;: Qinvi,,2,sxt.i i ig, ,•Las,s, ' ,, ., ••••:;;.::;':,x-Y:-..' 4 ,..1,:.,;..e•-,..c.,..,:",„,,,',-P'-, •-... „3,,,,„ ‘• s. .4 .,if 4 t• 't,tt'r.i-;:..,-- 44: Ca 4..!..; A s! - •„.,. , 7',-:-:, ::.':',;...r.:LL - ;,..??0,',:., '-...•''','"i;14- . '''''s'4- . .., .-. • - - .....',, .`;.,-'4f.'..?k,*,?,1 ....!.3. '.,•- -,/4 SE-1,,,P0 GT R-----it .-al--- -'"-- '''''''D P.I.-1€e- --.• 1"-.4 ' ) , ,i4, ,..,.„,.......... 9 _. f'., ,:.• 1 Ginsi ' C ..111 ..4s 41 •41 o' • :44? 13.1. P TR.- . ... 740.7,713 ......-..,... ._Al!...A •"" -1.1" - ...'•'.1i Z,.....:....F.TA...6 11 .0 Ti' - SE . 176.. _ -4- __ Inn .:-T _SpRII4c, SAt-1PLINc• ..!. 1.41.,...-..-...047- •ili)..T ,... ,...,,„,. - , . _ . , e e it tua ,..,,x ,,t,.., • SE Is• g.,s.y• 'erT, - Io 11 , & './.1. • i LocA-TIoN s , .,,,,,,4 ..,., -,..-,. f, •k: ',I.; :I,' ' Sr isaTuiL.Emil ,&U •. . ... SE ISO? ST L./ -, . .s. D. CarRy 2. /92 .‘V. T;i:'.•:•Tyip.:....1 .., • -.V-, '-'1 L S:1..S T:$Tr,st.1-1 7.1., ..:. - i. SI vS7 ... IlLiku.'1 ‘;‘••• w . -c!...... its/TI .2, L.'L•.r,d.1 S.; '':1 • ;::1:0.er I.; ' .,•_.iitsct;:. •witt!r: i y urammill, 1 = I u .•••• I 0 t1,4 11.,rs, 0 ,, r •••• , , . .. .-- .,.. . . ,wr.Y . . w ;.,,,,,q, • -... , RD t"..:_t ........... ' - 1 ,...., , • ---,. 45 :.:.2 0411P1f7'1% ti-4:4.; P- - "-c= • - - -• -r, -I.- -.•- •- • - -- -'2-1' 1 Site#3 Maplewood Golf Course-East Side Of Course -. Hillside/4'Pipe Date Conductivity Total-P Nitrite Nitrate CI BACTERIA (#/100 ml) NO2-N NO3-N (umho/cm) (mgP/L) (mgN/L) (mgN/L) (mg/L)Tot. Col. IFec.Col. IFec. Strp. DW Standards NA 1 10 250* presence/absence*2 GW Standards 700* NA 1 10 250 4/9/91 Not Req. 0.062 <0.010 3.021 9.80 <2 <2 2,100 4/24/91 256 0.088 <0.010 0.896 22.03 est. 10 est. 10 est. 10 11/7/91 Unable to Sample 11/20/91 182 0.093 <0.010 0.972 12.35 880 <2 660 1/10/92 198 0.050 <0.010 0.159 6.74 4700 34 392 1/24/92 184 0.071 <0.010 0.202 6.40 300 36 36 1/28/92 131 0.216 <0.010 0.126 5.80 170 270 200 3/5/92 216 0.076 <0.010 <0.010 15.60 est. 8 est. 2 14 4/14/92 198 0.333 <0.010 <0.010 6.80 580 <2 14 9/24/92 No Running Water 10/21/92 No Running Water 1 Site#4 Maplewood Heights - 141st Ave. - Hillside Spring Date Conductivity Total-P Nitrite Nitrate CI BACTERIA (#/100 ml) NO2-N NO3-N (umho/cm) (mg P/L) (mg N/L) (mg N/L) (mg/L) Tot. Col. Fec. Col. IFec. Strp. DW Standards NA 1 10 250* presence/absence*2 I GW Standards 700* NA 1 10 250 4/9/91 Not Req. 0.026 <0.010 4.334 5.20 <2 <2 78 4/24/91 183 0.017 <0.010 6.874 9.04 <2 <2 <2 11/7/91 211 0.027 <0.010 7.806 18.52 est. 20 <2 1961 11/20/91 201 0.031 <0.010 7.770 15.49 est. 2 <2 6 1/10/92 200 0.047 <0.010 9.028 10.93 est. 8 <2 <2 1/24/92 201 0.028 <0.010 9.662 12.16 est. 2 <2 est. 8 1/28/92 176 0.052 <0.010 7.474 9.90 <2 <2 est. 2 3/5/92 191 0.036 <0.010 8.773 9.70 <2 <2 <21 4/14/92 232 0.214 <0.010 8.302 . 13.20 10 <2 <2 9/24/92 221 0.024 <0.010 11.600 13.60 est. 76 est. 16 est. 20 10/21/92 236 0.163 <0.010 9.210 18.50 est. 6 est. 2 est. 2 I I I 1 Page 2 ERISAMP.XLS 1 r Alan Werner 14238 143 Ave SE - Renton,WA 98059 206/255-6578 REBUTTAL OF STATEMENTS MADE BY THE CITY OF RENTON REGARDING MAPLEWOOD HEIGHTS The City of Renton has made repeated assertions that Maplewood Heights is endangering the City of Renton's.aquifer without factual documentation. The statements lack even rudimentary scientific,engineering, or technical basis-in-fact. Most of the statements appear to be an attempt to find evidence to support pre-conceived conclusion fitting the City of Renton's growth plans. Background information Maplewood Heights is a residential neighborhood of 162 homes covering an area of approximately eight tenths (0.80) square mile. It is situated on the bluff north of the Cedar River valley about three miles east of the center of Renton. The valley floor is about 300 feet below the mean elevation Of the residential area. The soil under Maplewood Heights;and all of the East Renton Plateau, is typically glacial till (gravel) with alternating layers of clay at variable depths. The Cedar River has cut through these layers rather than folding them into a trough Comparison of Area When Maplewood Heights is compared to the total area of the East Renton Plateau,it is found to be a small percentage. -The East Renton Plateau covers an estimated 50 square miles from the Renton Highlands to Lake Kathleen,from the Cedar River Valley rim to May Creek. When divided, the area represented by Maplewood Heights to the whole of • the East Renton Plateau is 1.6 percent, less than 1/50th of the total. Another way to respresent this fact is to total the estimated water collection within Maplewood Heights from precipitation and residential effluent. Taken at 39 inches of rain per year(a Seattle area average) over the 0.80 square mile of the neighborhood amounts to 4,076,000 gallons per year. This assumes that 75% is soaked into the ground, a liberal assumption for this analysis. Assuming each of the 162 houses within Maplewood Heights use 400 cubic feet per month (equal to 2,992 gallons per month), when taken over a year's time amounts to 5,816,000 gallons per year. Almost all of this goes into the drain fields, therefore into the ground. When combined, the total ground water contribution from the,Maplewood Heights sub-division is about 10,000;000 (ten million) gallons per year. The City of Renton withdraws a.total of XXX million gallons per-pAY from the well system. If ALL;:of the water from Maplewood Heights were to be withdrawn by the City of Renton.- which is highly unlikely considering the facts below- it would amount to %%% of the supply. A statement that a small area, such as Maplewood Heights,polluting an aquifer is a gross mis-representation Of physical factsNc. Maplewood Heights Surface Water Dispersion Thee comparative closeness:;of the:Cedar River to Maplewood Heights and the alinement of the permeable layers of the underlying geology dictates that surface water collected in Maplewood Heights would stay close to the surface until it emptied into the Cedar River. e ' fc �l .elan Werner 14238 143 Ave SE Renton,WA 98059 206/255-6578 Water would have the tendency to flow downwards and out of the hillside in a northeast to southwest direction, typically into the creek draining the canyon to the north and west of Maplewood Heights. From observation, the flow of this un-named creek is small at the Maplewood Heights Elementary School but fairly substantial as it flows through the Maplewood Golf Course. The source of the flow comes from the hillside from both Maplewood Heights and Heather Downs. Water that does not flow into the creek is likely to flow in the same general direction until it intercepts the lower surface at the valley floor or the shallow aquifer under the valley floor. For surface water or shallowly introduced water(septic effluent) from Maplewood Heights to reach the deep aquifer is highly unlikely. • Surface Water Studies The City of Renton has conducted surface water run-off studies in and around the Maplewood Golf Course. These data, collected from April 1991 through October 1992, are from six springs or surface collection points. Five of the points are from the Golf Course proper, one is a comparison standard from the other side of the valley. Almost all of the data is consistent and below acceptable standards except one location that shows elevated levels of nitrate (NO3) while all other data,including nitrites (NO2), are the same as other locations. It must be concluded, in the absence of other explanations, that this one location is an aberration caused by some local phenomenon such as a bog or decay collection up gradient from the sample point. Taken as a whole, the data supports the contention that surface water sources are not contributory to aquifer degradation in the vicinity of the Golf Course water supply well. Aquifer Recharge An aquifer is recharged over a large area, typically over several square miles. It gathers water usually from precipitation;for transport to a level'above an impermeable layer over which it flows laterally downhill to a termination such as a lake or river. The city of Renton chose the deep aquifer at.,a level 350 feet below the surface such that it was isolated from surface water sources. The Cedar River,which flowed over the deep aquifer, as well as normal surface water are two such surface water sources to be avoided. (As an example of this fact, the City of Renton forced the State Department of Transportation to alter the design of the bridge over the-Cedar River for I-405. The bridge pylons would have penetrated the isolating layer which would have introduced Cedar River water into the aquifer. The location of thezaltered design is about two miles west of the Maplewood Golf Course, the location of one of the City's wells.) Geologists dispute the actual area from which the deep aquifer is recharged, according to Mark Semera, a drilling engineer with RH2 Engineers of Redmond,WA. The general flow pattern within is north - south, but they do not know if the prevailing flow is from the north (East Renton Plateau) or from the south(the Soos Creek Plateau). Mr Semera noted that in their test drilling in and around the Maplewood area(m the valley), there were no elevated levels of organics, nitrites (NO2), or nitrates (NO3) that would signal degradation by human caused sources. Mr Semera also noted that a shallow aquifer at 30 to 50 feet below the valley floor surface exists,probably in communication with the Cedar River. In a surprising statement, he stated that this aquifer is charged from the lower, deep aquifer by virtue of 2 _ I lan Werner 14238 143 Ave SE Renton,WA 98059 206/255-6578 the greater hydrostatic pressure differences between them. In other words, the deep aquifer flows upwards rather than drawing downwards in the vicinity of the city's well on the Maplewood Golf Course. Local surface sources, such as Maplewood Heights, would be blocked from entering the aquifer from which the water is drawn for the city. Lack of Cited Failures The City of Renton has repeated stated that the reason for the East Maplewood Interceptor ar failing septic systems In Maplewood Heights. There are NO records of any failed septic systems within Maplewood Heights in the 25 year history of the neighborhood. Two drain fields have been replaced, but these are not failures. As shown above, the quality of the City of Renton's water supplied has not altered during this period. The question has to be asked-what failed septic systems, and what documented evidence of influence on the City's water supply? Simply stated, there is none! It would appear that the City of Renton has invented gremlins and spooks to justify a conclusion. Conclusion The City of Renton, as shown in a article in the Valley Daily News, January 11, 1993 has decided to annex the area covered by the hydrological drain afforded by the proposed interceptor,regardless of the overall wishes of the residents. To do this,it must invent a crisis which it would then supply a solution. That is the conclusion for which the scientifically inaccurate data and hypotheses attempt to support. The sewer issue has nothing to do with public health, drainage,or water supply protection—it has every thing to do with socio-economic growth,land use planning, and power influence! The conclusions drawn by the residents of Maplewood Heights, and by all of the East Renton Plateau in Water District 90,is that the City of Renton,rather than showing a better reason to join,is using an underhanded method to force annexation. Like the subject of the sewer itself,it stinks. 3 CITY OF FIENToN I 74At _ JAN 0 6 1993 ..1,/ /67. 1, RECEIVED CnCLERK'S OFFICE fi),J9Sa.iL A CA' (-AXL -/h3C-72al 9,1JAA, k_ !,-, , ;),(1(74///0 " I�G��I I,eh - , 7�+ cJ w i ry- Crime dmehhipu<L;A.jd--001 c?)/k(Z_ (\)-di,c(A4'HZA44V4 (*if - ,5z/w-cavi 9 (/4e C59k � 9_ _ , CA-04-2),, C/R0 *1-) ice, YA-5 / 'is 176/1/ 4i'ar' /42,e (--- iii s /,J, 04 /46- IFP . . _ . 'i, iii ...._..M . . • afr ADVERTISING SPECipk.i Y COUNSELING INCORPORATED • PROMOTIONAL PRODUCTS • IMPRINTED/EMBROIDERED SPORTSWEAR - TROPHIES AND AWARDS • ATHLETIC WEAR • UNIFORMS ---------,----- ----,- — 1 1 . . !.. i 1 i C70-'1./Cre/V111-_,,, __ ,' ..:_._ • i I •-• I i .1 •' ' i' 1-"<'- ' ; ......r."/:'°0".*4--- 1 /...4-.e-.ej' -1 -- a: --; -4 • I i 1 i 1 1 1 i 1 i ........e.A2/Lezot.......- • i 074"it_ ,,......4.4.1„\ I _ 1 . 1 i 3 1 i , I . .: 1 -•"" 4 -1' -r- : ' • i I i'i ', ;' ' i ' I I 1 I ; i /oil/ I I ---- ! I 1 1 1 ! . I;• ! ! i • I I . : i ! 1 ± 1 1 . 1 I !---- :• - ---4-- : i - ; i idtplitt : - . 1 i I i •' i i -I- ! i ; ! i 1 _13; ..i. 1 le, ,.. . 3p , 1 , -,---, i- •i ...... .r.it." ,i., i•- -t 1 1 , . .---- ' ' RECEIVED ' /1- - ------i ---! ----i------: ; . : 1992 i 4,i ir G it...1e4.$ 1 : • '-------L-RENTON-CITY-60 UN 0 1 Li--- --pi gsibr 7841 South 180th Street, Kent, WA 98032 Phone (206) 251-9000 FAX (206) 251-0457