HomeMy WebLinkAboutECF_Envir_Checklist_191206_v1
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 1 of 13
SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
Purpose of checklist:
Governmental agencies use this checklist to help determine whether the environmental impacts of your
proposal are significant. This information is also helpful to determine if available avoidance, minimization
or compensatory mitigation measures will address the probable significant impacts or if an environmental
impact statement will be prepared to further analyze the proposal.
Instructions for applicants:
This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Please
answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. You may need to consult
with an agency specialist or private consultant for some questions. You may use “not applicable” or
"does not apply" only when you can explain why it does not apply and not when the answer is unknown.
You may also attach or incorporate by reference additional studies reports. Complete and accurate
answers to these questions often avoid delays with the SEPA process as well as later in the decision-
making process.
The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of
time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal
or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your
answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant
adverse impact.
Instructions for Lead Agencies:
Please adjust the format of this template as needed. Additional information may be necessary to
evaluate the existing environment, all interrelated aspects of the proposal and an analysis of adverse
impacts. The checklist is considered the first but not necessarily the only source of information needed to
make an adequate threshold determination. Once a threshold determination is made, the lead agency is
responsible for the completeness and accuracy of the checklist and other supporting documents.
Use of checklist for nonproject proposals:
For nonproject proposals (such as ordinances, regulations, plans and programs), complete the applicable
parts of sections A and B plus the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). Please
completely answer all questions that apply and note that the words "project," "applicant," and "property or
site" should be read as "proposal," "proponent," and "affected geographic area," respectively. The lead
agency may exclude (for non-projects) questions in Part B - Environmental Elements –that do not
contribute meaningfully to the analysis of the proposal.
A. Background [HELP]
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable:
Flatiron-Lane JV Field Office Trailer Rental / Laydown Area
2. Name of applicant:
Flatiron-Lane, a Joint Venture (FLJV)
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 2 of 13
3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person:
1400 Talbot Road South, Renton, WA 98055
4. Date checklist prepared:
11/26/2019
5. Agency requesting checklist:
City of Renton, Planning Division
6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable):
Optimal Trailer placement and occupancy timing would be as early 2020 as possible.
7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or
connected with this proposal? If yes, explain.
No
8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be
prepared, directly related to this proposal.
N/A
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other
proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain.
None
10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known.
Tier 2 Temp Use (City of Renton), Civil Construction Permit (City of Renton-*if necessary), and
Building Permit (City of Renton).
11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size
of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to
describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this
page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project
description.)
Flatiron-Lane JV proposes the implementation of Temporary Office Trailers (7,000 SF each 9-
Plex for at full capacity, a total of 30,000 SF) to be utilized on King County Parcel 3224059049
addressed 4350 Lake Washington Boulevard N. Trailers will be located in the central region of
the parcel just north of the southernmost existing warehouse. The Temp office trailers will house
the JV staff as well as WSDOT’s inspectors. The site will also be used as laydown yard for
equipment and materials. The trailers will also be tied-in to the existing utility lines.
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise
location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and
range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or
boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic
map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you
are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications
related to this checklist.
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 3 of 13
King County Parcel 3224059049 addressed 4350 Lake Washington Boulevard N. Map already
provided. NW1/4 Sec. 32, T24N, R5E, W.M.
B. Environmental Elements [HELP]
1. Earth [help]
a. General description of the site:
The current site surface is Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) throughout.
(circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other _____________
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)?
10% entrance ramp to the site.
c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat,
muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any
agricultural land of long-term commercial significance and whether the proposal results in
removing any of these soils.
The land that Flatiron-Lane will be using does not posses any surface soils as the land is all
HMA paved minus a small on the southernmost section of the parcel that does have a bit of
gravel. (Flatiron-Lane plans to avoid this area) Sandy loam, see USDA Soil map attached as
Exhibit No. 2
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so,
describe.
No history of unstable soils has been seen.
e. Describe the purpose, type, total area, and approximate quantities and total affected area of
any filling, excavation, and grading proposed. Indicate source of fill.
No earthwork to be performed here.
f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe.
No erosion is forseen by any activities to be performed on-site. We are not disturbing any soils.
g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project
construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)?
Same as current (Approx. 95% HMA)
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any:
No earth disturbing impacts to occur.
2. Air [help]
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal during construction,
operation, and maintenance when the project is completed? If any, generally describe
and give approximate quantities if known.
The only emmisions forseen would be those of equipment used to build/break down the
trailer complex’s. Also, in maintaining our equipment on site, there may be some minor
emissions from heavy vehicles.
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 4 of 13
b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so,
generally describe.
N/A
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any:
None.
3. Water [help]
a. Surface Water: [help]
Small adjacent stream just south of the parcel: May Creek
1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including
year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe
type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into.
May Creek is a year round creek.
2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described
waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans.
No. As shown on the parcel layout plan provided, the proposed Temporary Office Trailers
are well outside of the buffer zone.
3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed
from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected.
Indicate the source of fill material.
None.
4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general
description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
No
5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan.
A FEMA zone does exist and Flatiron-Lane plans to avoid this area with a minimum 15’
Buffer.
6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so,
describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge.
No
b. Ground Water: [help]
1) Will groundwater be withdrawn from a well for drinking water or other purposes? If so,
give a general description of the well, proposed uses and approximate quantities
withdrawn from the well. Will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general
description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
No
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 5 of 13
2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or
other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the
following chemicals. . . ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the
number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the
number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve.
No waste will be discharged into ground.
c. Water runoff (including stormwater):
Existing Catch Basins on site to relieve all current and future runoff. No plan to change any
grades. No added runoff from construction.
1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection
and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow?
Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe.
Existing Catch Basins to collect stormwater runoff.
2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe.
NO
3) Does the proposal alter or otherwise affect drainage patterns in the vicinity of the site? If
so, describe.
No.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water, and drainage
pattern impacts, if any:
None.
4. Plants [help]
a. Check the types of vegetation found on the site:
__Y__deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other
__Y__evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other
__Y__shrubs
__Y__grass
____pasture
____crop or grain
____ Orchards, vineyards or other permanent crops.
____ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other
____water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other
__Y__other types of vegetation (Rubus Armeniacus - Himalayan Blackberry)
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?
No vegetation removal is proposed. Avoiding any vegetation removals.
c. List threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site.
May Creek Biological Evaluation Report, February, 2011 mentions the possibility of Steelhead
(Oncorhynchn Mykiss) and Chinook Salmon (Oncorhynchn Tshcwytscha)
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 6 of 13
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance
vegetation on the site, if any:
NA
e. List all noxious weeds and invasive species known to be on or near the site.
Himalayan Blackberry Bushes (Rubus armeniacus)
5. Animals [help]
a. List any birds and other animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known
to be on or near the site.
No animals identified.
Examples include:
birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other:
mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other:
fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other ________
b. List any threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site.
May Creek Biological Evaluation Report, February, 2011 mentions the possibility of Steelhead
(Oncorhynchn Mykiss) and Chinook Salmon (Oncorhynchn Tshcwytscha)
c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain.
Yes, lies in the migration route of the Pacific Flyaway and other Waterfowl.
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any:
Removal of invasive Blackberry Bushes.
e. List any invasive animal species known to be on or near the site.
None known.
6. Energy and Natural Resources [help]
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet
the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating,
manufacturing, etc.
Electrical power will be relayed from tie-ins located in the center of the parcel. (shown on site
plan). Power will be used for heating, lighting, HVAC, etc to keep the trailers inhabitable.
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties?
If so, generally describe.
No affect.
c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal?
List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any:
No conservation strategy in effect. Energy impacts very minimal, if any.
7. Environmental Health [help]
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 7 of 13
a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk
of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal?
If so, describe.
None
1) Describe any known or possible contamination at the site from present or past uses.
None
2) Describe existing hazardous chemicals/conditions that might affect project development and
design. This includes underground hazardous liquid and gas transmission pipelines located
within the project area and in the vicinity.
None
3) Describe any toxic or hazardous chemicals that might be stored, used, or produced during
the project's development or construction, or at any time during the operating life of the
project.
Any hazardous liquids on site will be subject to secondary containment. Solid hazardous
materials will be subject to being –palletized (Removed from contact with the ground) and
wrapped in containment plastics.
4) Describe special emergency services that might be required.
Chemical safety training / emergency eyewash/cleaning stations (training administered to
all occupants on-site)
5) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any:
None
b. Noise
1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example:
traffic, equipment, operation, other)?
There will be minimal noise from the demolition of one of the existing buildings on-site.
Demolition equipment and vehicles will be used to remove the debris.
2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a
short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indi-
cate what hours noise would come from the site.
Short term construction noise from mobilization on site (set-up) / demobilization (break-down) of
trailers only.
3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any:
None necessary.
8. Land and Shoreline Use [help]
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? W ill the proposal affect current
land uses on nearby or adjacent properties? If so, describe.
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 8 of 13
Current use of the site utilizes two of the four existing buildings as storage space. Tennants are
to vacate the site within 90 days. The property is surrounded by public roadways on the north
and west while I-405 lies on the parcels east side. The southern side is adjacent to an existing
public park-loop trail. (May Creek Trail)
b. Has the project site been used as working farmlands or working forest lands? If so, describe.
How much agricultural or forest land of long-term commercial significance will be converted to
other uses as a result of the proposal, if any? If resource lands have not been designated,
how many acres in farmland or forest land tax status will be converted to nonfarm or
nonforest use?
No.
1) Will the proposal affect or be affected by surrounding working farm or forest land normal
business operations, such as oversize equipment access, the application of pesticides,
tilling, and harvesting? If so, how:
No
c. Describe any structures on the site.
4 Existing Structures (3 metal, 1 wood framed) 1 office building, storage warehouses. Total
Square feet of existing buildings is 60,577 sf
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what?
Yes, in order to fit our 30,000 SF of complex’s on the parcel that we will have to remove the
buildings located at the center of the parcel. (total sf of demo: 10,427 sf) See layout plan,
attached to SEPA checklist. (Exhibit 3)
e. What is the current zoning classification of the site?
The parcel is zoned as Commercial-Office-Residential (COR).
f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site?
Commercial-Office-Residential
g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site?
A portion of this parcel, approximately 40,180 square feet, along the southern boundary line are
designated as Shoreline High Intensity as well as May Creek Reach B (MC-B). The southern
portion of the southern boundary line borders the Shoreline Urban Conservancy Environment
Overlay District. In addition, a portion of the parcel (approximately 18,617 square feet) along the
southern boundary line is located within the 100-year special flood zone.
h. Has any part of the site been classified as a critical area by the city or county? If so, specify.
This site also is within a high seismic hazard zone.
i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project?
At max capacity, with 30,000 sf of occupied office trailer space, our total body count on-site
would be near 200 persons.
j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace?
None.
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 9 of 13
j. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any:
N/A
L. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land
uses and plans, if any:
Coordination with the Land Owner (Vulcan) and Future Developer (Sound Transit)
m. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts to agricultural and forest lands of long-term
commercial significance, if any:
N/A
9. Housing [help]
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, mid-
dle, or low-income housing.
None
b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high,
middle, or low-income housing.
None
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any:
N/A
10. Aesthetics [help]
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is
the principal exterior building material(s) proposed?
The temp buildings will be at max height around 15’ high.
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed?
No views to be altered.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any:
Minimal if no aesthetic impacts.
11. Light and Glare [help]
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly
occur?
No lighting / glare impacts
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views?
No.
c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal?
None.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any:
None.
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 10 of 13
12. Recreation [help]
a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity?
The May Creek Trail is located on the parcel to the immediate south.
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe.
No displacements to existing recreational uses foreseen.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation
opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any:
N/A
13. Historic and cultural preservation [help]
a. Are there any buildings, structures, or sites, located on or near the site that are over 45 years
old listed in or eligible for listing in national, state, or local preservation registers ? If so,
specifically describe.
No
b. Are there any landmarks, features, or other evidence of Indian or historic use or occupation?
This may include human burials or old cemeteries. Are there any material evidence, artifacts,
or areas of cultural importance on or near the site? Please list any professional studies
conducted at the site to identify such resources.
The City of Renton has a sign at the May Creek Trail indicating the existence of a “Pioneer
Homestead” on or near May Creek. Other than that sign, no other evidence of Native American
or historic use of the site can be found.
c. Describe the methods used to assess the potential impacts to cultural and historic resources
on or near the project site. Examples include consultation with tribes and the department of
archeology and historic preservation, archaeological surveys, historic maps, GIS data, etc.
Review of historic aerial maps provided by King County and property / parcel records provided
by King County.
d. Proposed measures to avoid, minimize, or compensate for loss, changes to, and disturbance
to resources. Please include plans for the above and any permits that may be required.
No disturbance or changes to resources foreseen.
14. Transportation [help]
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site or affected geographic area and
describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any.
Site is adjacent to interstate 405 and has access off of Exit 7 to Lake Washington Blvd. N.
b. Is the site or affected geographic area currently served by public transit? If so, generally
describe. If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop?
No public transit in the affected geographic area. Closest transit stop to the parcel is: 1.1 miles I-
405 / NE 30th Bus stop. The closest transit facility is the Renton Transit Center.
c. How many additional parking spaces would the completed project or non-project proposal
have? How many would the project or proposal eliminate?
The project will add nearly 150 parking stalls sized at 9’ x 20’ for staff vehicles and trucks. Stalls
will be temporarily striped.
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 11 of 13
e. Will the proposal require any new or improvements to existing roads, streets, pedestrian,
bicycle or state transportation facilities, not including driveways? If so, generally describe
(indicate whether public or private).
No improvements to existing roads necessary. The existing driveway to the parcel is in excellent
condition.
e. Will the project or proposal use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air
transportation? If so, generally describe.
No
f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project or proposal?
If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur and what percentage of the volume would
be trucks (such as commercial and nonpassenger vehicles). What data or transportation
models were used to make these estimates?
We do expect trucks on site for deliveries intermittently but not daily.
g. Will the proposal interfere with, affect or be affected by the movement of agricultural and
forest products on roads or streets in the area? If so, generally describe.
No.
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any:
None
15. Public Services [help]
a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection,
police protection, public transit, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe.
No.
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any.
None.
16. Utilities [help]
a. Circle utilities currently available at the site:
electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system,
other ___________
f. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service,
and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might
be needed.
FLJV will tie office trailers into the existing 8” Sewer line, and the existing 12” water main on site.
Electrical drop ins are also available and all are shown on the site plan. (Exhibit 1)
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 13 of 13
wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or
cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands?
Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are:
5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it
would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans?
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are:
6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public
services and utilities?
Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are:
7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or
requirements for the protection of the environment.
Soil Map—King County Area, Washington
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
11/25/2019
Page 1 of 3526427052643105264350526439052644305264470526451052645505264590526427052643105264350526439052644305264470526451052645505264590560120560160560200560240560280560320560360
560120 560160 560200 560240 560280 560320 560360
47° 31' 55'' N 122° 12' 4'' W47° 31' 55'' N122° 11' 52'' W47° 31' 44'' N
122° 12' 4'' W47° 31' 44'' N
122° 11' 52'' WN
Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 10N WGS84
0 50 100 200 300
Feet
0 20 40 80 120
Meters
Map Scale: 1:1,670 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet.
Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
Area of Interest (AOI)
Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils
Soil Map Unit Polygons
Soil Map Unit Lines
Soil Map Unit Points
Special Point Features
Blowout
Borrow Pit
Clay Spot
Closed Depression
Gravel Pit
Gravelly Spot
Landfill
Lava Flow
Marsh or swamp
Mine or Quarry
Miscellaneous Water
Perennial Water
Rock Outcrop
Saline Spot
Sandy Spot
Severely Eroded Spot
Sinkhole
Slide or Slip
Sodic Spot
Spoil Area
Stony Spot
Very Stony Spot
Wet Spot
Other
Special Line Features
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Transportation
Rails
Interstate Highways
US Routes
Major Roads
Local Roads
Background
Aerial Photography
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
1:24,000.
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil
line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of
contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed
scale.
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL:
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more
accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
of the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: King County Area, Washington
Survey Area Data: Version 15, Sep 16, 2019
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales
1:50,000 or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Jul 1, 2019—Jul 25,
2019
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
Soil Map—King County Area, Washington
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
11/25/2019
Page 2 of 3
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
No Norma sandy loam 8.6 100.0%
Totals for Area of Interest 8.6 100.0%
Soil Map—King County Area, Washington
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
11/25/2019
Page 3 of 3