HomeMy WebLinkAboutParks, Recreation and Natural Areas Plan - 2020 (RES4398)PARKS, RECREATION &NATURAL AREAS PLAN
Renton
Parks, Recreation and Natural Areas Plan
FINAL DRAFT JANU ARY 2020RESOLUTION NO. 4398
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION &NATURAL AREAS PLAN
Renton
Parks, Recreation and Natural Areas Plan
FINAL DRAFT JANUARY 2020RESOLUTION NO. 4398
II | CITY OF RENTON
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Mayor
Armondo Pavone
Chief Administrative Officer
Robert Harrison
City Council
Ruth Pérez, Council President
Randy Corman
Ryan McIrvin
Valerie O’Halloran
Ed Prince
Kim-Khánh Văn
Council Position 2 (vacant)
Parks Commission
Cynthia Burns
Al Dieckman
Larry Reymann
Tim Searing
Shun Takano
Troy Wigestrand
Marlene Winter
Planning Commission
Angelina Benedetti
Mara Fiksdal
David Fleetwood
Shannon Matson
Kevin Poole
Charles Seil
Project Team
Erica Schmitz, Community Services
Department, Parks Planning Manager
Leslie Betlach, Community Services Department,
Parks Planning and Natural Resources Director
Katie Buchl-Morales, Community & Economic
Development Department, Assistant Planner
Angie Mathias, Community & Economic Development
Department, Long Range Planning Manager
Steering Committee
Julio Amador, Renton Citizen
Mary Clymer, Renton Arts Commission
Marjorie Cochran-Reep, Renton
Senior Advisory Board
Al Dieckman, Renton Parks Commission
Bob Elliot, Renton Non-Motorized
Transportation Advisory Committee
Mara Fiksdal, Renton Planning Commission
Alisa Louie, Renton School Board Member
Pete Maas, Renton Non-Motorized
Transportation Advisory Committee
Larry Reymann, Renton Parks Commission
Erica Richey, Adult Active Recreation
Don Sando, Youth Active Recreation
Kathy Ulrich, Communities in Schools of Renton
Inclusion Task Force
Hamdi Abdulle
Violet Aesquivel
Julio Amador
Benjamin Bunyatipanon
Suad Farole
Linda Hoste
Alicia Ing
Rupinder Kaur
Linet Madeja-Bravo
Pastor Caleb Mayberry
Dr. Kevin McCarthy
Jackie Nguyen
Jennifer O’Neal
Council President Ruth Pérez
Rolly Polintan
Kevin Poole
Councilmember Ed Prince
Oleg Pynda
Ted Rodriguez
Vasudha Sharma
Balwant Singh
Jamian L. Smith
Rev. Dr. Linda Smith
Menka Soni
Monique Taylor Swan
Duc Tran
Kim-Khánh Văn
A special “Thank You” to everyone who attended a community open house or participated
in the planning process via the community priority survey, online open house, online
interactive map, project website, or direct contact to the City by email or telephone.
We appreciate your comments and plan support.
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | III
ACKNOWLEDGMENTSACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Inclusive Outreach Partners
Hamdi Abdulle
Violet Aesquivel
Julio Amador
Rupinder Kaur
Monique Taylor Swan
Stakeholders
James Alberson, Chamber of
Commerce Board, President
Victoria García Tamayo, Kaiser Permanente,
Manager, Community Health
Kim J. Wicklund, Kaiser Permanente, Director,
Community Health & Benefit
Millie Phung, Renton Housing Authority,
Development Specialist
Rocale Timmons, SECO Development, Inc.,
Sr. Vice President of Planning & Development
Alisa Winkler, Renton School District,
K-5 Science Facilitator
External Recreation Service Providers
Steve Beck, Starfire Sports, Co-Founder,
Secretary and Director
Robert Eaton, City of Tukwila Parks and Recreation
Matthew Feldmeyer, Renton School District, Facilities
Director, Parks and Recreation Manager
Dani Hastings, Coal Creek Family, YMCA, Community
Engagement and Volunteer Director
Brian Levenhagen, City of Kent Recreation,
Deputy Parks Director
Administrative Services
Jan Hawn, Administrative Services Administrator
Jason Seth, City Clerk/Public Records Officer
City Attorney
Shane Moloney
Community & Economic Development
Chip Vincent, Community & Economic
Development Administrator
Amanda Askren, Property and
Technical Services Manager
Katie Buchl-Morales, Assistant Planner
Jennifer Henning, Planning Director
Angie Mathias, Long Range Planning Manager
Aaron Raymond, GIS Analyst II
Community Services
Kelly Beymer, Community Services Administrator
Margie Beitner, Community Services
Administration, Administrative Secretary I
Steve Brown, Parks Maintenance Manager
Donna Eken, Program Coordinator
Roberta Graver, Community Services
Administration, Administrative Assistant
Ian Gray, Urban Forestry and Natural
Resources Manager
Drey Hicks, Neighborhood Coordinator
Cailín Hunsaker, Parks & Trails Director
Lisa McMartin, Recreation Systems Technician
Jeff Minisci, Facilities Director
Carrie Nass, Recreation & Neighborhoods Manager
Andy O’Brien, Recreation Supervisor
Maryjane Van Cleave, Recreation &
Neighborhoods Director
Alan Wyatt, Capital Projects Manager
Public Affairs & Communications
Preeti Shridhar, Deputy Public Affairs Administrator
Sheila Cowley, Communications Specialist I
Benita Horn, Inclusion & Equity Consultant
Karl Hurst, Print/ Mail Supervisor
Dave Neubert, Communications Manager
Consultant: MIG, Inc.
Lauren Schmitt, Principal
Ryan Mottau, Sr. Project Manager
Molly Cooney-Mesker, Project Manager
Brice Maryman, Landscape Architect
Casey Howard, Landscape Designer
Jamillah Jordan, Community Engagement Specialist
EMC Research: Ian Stewart & Riley Jones
Special thank you to Mike Hamilton for photos of
Renton’s wildlife and habitat.
Meadow Crest Accessible Playground photos courtesy of
Robb Williamson.
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
IV | CITY OF RENTON
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Acknowledgments ii
Table of Contents iv
Executive Summary vii
Introduction xvii
Purpose of the Plan ..............................................................................................xviii
Relationship to other Planning Efforts ...............................................................xix
Plan Development ...................................................................................................xx
The Future of Renton’s Parks System 1
Vision .............................................................................................................................3
Goals and Objectives ................................................................................................3
Existing Conditions 11
Renton Today ..............................................................................................................12
Providing Parks, Recreation and Natural Areas ................................................15
Park Land and Recreation Facilities .....................................................................16
Recreation Programming and Services ..............................................................27
Natural Areas ............................................................................................................30
Community Involvement 37
Key Themes ...............................................................................................................38
Public Involvement Activities ................................................................................44
City Meetings and Coordination..........................................................................50
Community Needs 51
Washington’s Recreation and Conservation Office Guidelines ..................52
Park Needs .................................................................................................................53
Park Land System-Wide ..........................................................................................57
Recreation Facility Needs .......................................................................................61
Indoor Programmable Spaces .............................................................................65
Recreation Programming Needs .........................................................................68
Natural Area and Resource Needs .......................................................................71
Staffing Needs ...........................................................................................................73
Summary of Needs ..................................................................................................75
Recommendations 77
System-Wide Recommendations .........................................................................78
Recommendations by Community Planning Area ...........................................87
1
2
3
4
5
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | V
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Implementation Plan 117
Decision Making Tools ..........................................................................................118
Capital Projects List ...............................................................................................125
Program Projects List ............................................................................................135
Implementation Strategies ...................................................................................137
Funding Strategies .................................................................................................139
Monitoring, Reviewing and Updating ................................................................148
Concept Plans 149
Black River Riparian Forest ..................................................................................152
Cleveland Richardson Property .......................................................................154
East Plateau Community Park .............................................................................156
Edlund Property ......................................................................................................158
Highlands Park and Neighborhood Center .....................................................160
Kennydale Lions Park ............................................................................................162
May Creek Park.......................................................................................................164
Tiffany Park/Cascade Park Connection ............................................................166
Riverside: Tri-Park (Cedar River Park, Liberty Park, N.A.R.CO Property) 168
Windsor Hills Park ..................................................................................................170
Bibliography 173
Glossary Terms 175
Maps
Existing Parks and Natural Areas Map .................................................................21
Developed Park Access Map ...............................................................................56
Developed Park Access & Residential Density Map ......................................58
Trailhead Access Map ............................................................................................60
Sports Field Access ................................................................................................62
Natural Area Access Map.......................................................................................70
Tables and Figures
Table 2.1: Race and Ethnicity 2000-2014 City of Renton ................................14
Table 2.2: Park Land by Classification City of Renton .....................................17
Table 2.3: City of Renton Sports Fields by User ..............................................26
Table 3.1: Open House #2 Combined Results on Park Priorities .................46
Table 3.2: Open House #2 Combined Results on Event Priorities .............47
Table 4.1: Recreation and Conservation Office LOS Tool ...............................54
Table 4.2: Park Acreage Standards .....................................................................57
Table 4.3: Park Land Needs Based on Level of Service Standard .............59
Table 4.4: Types of Trail Access Points ................................................................61
Table 4.5: Community Services Department: Divisions and Responsibilities
...........................................................................................................................73
6
7
TABLE OF CONTENTSRESOLUTION NO. 4398
VI | CITY OF RENTON
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Table 6.1: Ranked Project List ..........................................................................................126
Table 6.2: Capital Cost Summary ....................................................................................133
Table 6.3: Inflation Projections .........................................................................................134
Table 6.4: Operating Cost Summary ..............................................................................135
Table 6.5: Program Project List ........................................................................................136
Figure 3.1: Community Priority Survey, 2019 Results on Funding Priorities ..........41
Figure 3.2: Community Priority Survey, 2019 Results on Facility Investment
Priorities ......................................................................................................................43
Figure 3.3: Community Priority Survey, Results on Most Frequently Used
Programs ....................................................................................................................45
Figure 4.1: Sports Field Preferences ................................................................................63
Figure 4.2: Open House #2 Online and In-Person, 2019 Community Priority
Investment by Park Type ........................................................................................72
Figure 5.1: Community Planning Areas ...........................................................................87
Figure 6.1: Natural Area Management Continuum.....................................................122
Appendices
Appendix A: Park and Facility Inventory .......................................................................177
A-1: Renton Park System Inventory ����������������������������������������������������������������179
A-2: Renton School District Facilties ��������������������������������������������������������������181
A-3: Field Inventory���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������183
Appendix B: Decision Making Tools ...............................................................................185
Design Guidelines �����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������187
Natural Area Evaluation Tool ���������������������������������������������������������������������������197
Prioritization Criteria ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������202
Capital and Operations Cost M ���������������������������������������������������������������������207
Appendix C: Project List and Cost Model ����������������������������������������������������������������������211
C-1: Ranked Project List and Cost Model �����������������������������������������������������213
C-2: Cost Model Support Material ����������������������������������������������������������������221
C-3: Project List and Cost Model by Park Category �������������������������������225
C-4: Project List and Cost Model by Community Planning Area ����������233
Appendix D: Connecting with the Community ............................................................241
Appendix E: Trails Map .....................................................................................................245
Trails and Bicycle Improvements Map ���������������������������������������������������������247
Appendix F: Adopting Resolution ..................................................................................249
Under Separate Cover
Community-Wide Telephone Survey Final Summary, 2019
Public Input Reports/Summaries
Project List Scoring Detail
TABLE OF CONTENTSRESOLUTION NO. 4398
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
VIII | CITY OF RENTON
The City of Renton is growing, diversifying and maturing. To serve a changing
community, the City is investing in parks, recreation facilities, programs
and natural areas. This investment is guided by the community’s love and
enthusiasm for the places that support Renton’s identity. Community members
value Renton as a sustainable, interconnected community, with people who
work together to promote its health and vitality, protect its natural resources,
celebrate its character, and ensure its long-term dedication to a high quality of
life.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Parks, Recreation and Natural Areas Plan presents a long-term vision and goals for the City and
community for the next 20 years; describes current and future needs, interests and community preferences
for parks, recreation facilities and programs, and natural resources; and identifies system-based policies,
implementation strategies and an investment program to enhance and sustain parks, recreation and natural
areas as critical elements of a vibrant community. This plan also provides a framework to guide the City in
setting priorities, making decisions and funding improvements and operations for Renton’s parks, recreation
facilities and natural areas. Adoption and certification of this plan fulfills the requirements of the State of
Washington Recreation and Conservation Office (RCO) for grant funding eligibility.
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | Ix
This document is structured to align with three levels of planning in Renton: the city-wide system, the
Community Planning Areas and individual park sites. The Parks, Recreation and Natural Areas Plan
implements policies presented in the Renton Comprehensive Plan and provides specific guidance for
individual Community Plans. This Plan serves as a companion to the Trails and Bicycle Master Plan and
complements the Downtown Civic Core Vision and Action Plan.
VISION
Parks, Recreation and Natural Areas provide the opportunity for the community to connect to,
participate in, support and encourage a healthy environment and active lifestyle.
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
x | CITY OF RENTON
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Goal A: Filling Gaps in Service
Expand parks and recreational opportunities in areas with an
identified need, in order to fill gaps in service and keep pace with
future growth.
Goal B: Creating a Connected System
Create a connected system of parks, corridors, trails and natural
areas that provides equitable access to recreation opportunities.
Goal C: Building Partnerships
Cultivate strong, positive partnerships at the local and regional levels
with public, private and non-profit organizations to unite community
efforts to develop and sustain the park system.
Goal D: Creating Identity
Create a distinct identity that celebrates the natural, historic and
culturally diverse character of the Renton community through park
and facility design, recreation programming, interpretation and
education.
Goal E: Ensuring a Sustainable System
Ensure long-term economic and environmental sustainability in
system planning, design, operation, maintenance and decision
making.
Goal F: Promoting Health and Community
Through Programming
Promote healthy and active lifestyles and build community through
programs that are inclusive, fun and responsive to the needs and
preferences of Renton’s diverse population.
Goal G: Protecting and Conserving Natural
Resources
Protect, conserve and enhance Renton’s diverse natural resources
for the long-term health of ecosystems, and for the benefit and
enjoyment of future generations.
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | xI
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Planning Process
The City of Renton engaged residents, interest groups, park
users, City staff and agency representatives in the development
of the Parks, Recreation and Natural Areas Plan. These important
stakeholders provided feedback through a variety of meetings, open
houses, surveys, questionnaires, an interactive online mapping
exercise and two rounds of inclusive engagement. These diverse
outreach activities were designed to collect feedback from a variety
of people, including different cultural groups, ages and interests.
Over 1,800 people participated in the development of this Plan.
In addition to the many public involvement activities, several key
groups reviewed Plan content, provided direction and coordinated
this Plan with other City policies and goals. Community Services
Department staff from all divisions provided insights. Committees
and commissions who provided guidance included a 12-member
Steering Committee, the Parks Commission, the Mayor’s Inclusion
Task Force, the Planning Commission and the Renton City Council
Committee of the Whole.
The resulting Plan reflects the many different priorities and interests
of the Renton community. It also provides the City with the flexibility
to respond to changing community demographics and needs.
Recommendations
The Parks, Recreation and Natural Areas Plan includes
recommendations for parks and facilities across the entire City, as
well as recommendations for each of the ten Community Planning
Areas established by the Renton City Council. These ten areas
reflect distinct communities, in terms of identity, character, physical
features, existing infrastructure, services and access. Consequently,
community needs for parks, recreation opportunities and natural
areas also vary within these areas. This Plan provides overarching
guidance for all ten of the Community Planning Areas, addressing the
specific needs, priorities and character of each.
PARK LAND
Parks create opportunities for recreation, connecting people and
building community, protecting natural resources, and offering places
for quiet reflection and experiencing nature. The City of Renton
strives to provide access to developed parks and trails within a
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
xII | CITY OF RENTON
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
ten minute walk (1/2 mile) from home. Research shows this is the
distance most pedestrians are willing to walk to reach a destination
and is an emerging national standard. This Plan refines how that half-
mile is measured and targets providing parks within a five minute
walk (1/4 mile) within higher-density residential areas to recognize
the increased demand for facilities created by the increased
population. In addition, recommendations and conceptual designs
highlight how to maximize several key publicly owned park sites,
some in need of renovation and others yet undeveloped. Based on
community input and analysis, the Plan recommends developing land
the City has already purchased to expand access and keep up with
population growth.
RECREATION FACILITIES
Renton’s parks offer a wide range of outdoor recreation facilities,
adding recreational variety to the park system and supporting the
vision for healthy and active lifestyles. The Plan recommends more
recreation facilities, including additional and improved sports fields,
trails, usable indoor programmable space and other specialized
features, especially within existing parks. The City should continue
to add variety in play experiences available in Renton, a transition
that is underway with the Meadow Crest Accessible Playground and
recent playground replacement projects. The focus on developing
unique and varied facilities will help parks support the distinct
character of each Community Planning Area. At the same time,
upgrades and reinvestment in the City’s most popular parks, such as
Cedar River Park, are also recommended to increase site capacity and
use, while supporting Renton’s most valued park assets.
NATURAL AREAS
Natural areas provide a variety of public benefits including natural
resource education and volunteer opportunities. City residents feel
strongly about balancing public access to natural areas with the need
to protect and conserve natural resources. The Parks, Recreation and
Natural Areas Plan recommends continuing to protect natural areas
to enhance salmon habitat, the urban tree canopy and other natural
resources, while improving access to these areas. Fundamentally,
the community expressed a desire to have access to natural areas
wherever environmentally appropriate. Renton’s natural areas are
a critical link between people and their environment, building a
stewardship ethic and attracting residents and businesses.
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | xIII
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This plan recommends completing corridors, connecting existing
natural areas and adding natural spaces to existing parks. The City
should renew focus on understanding and managing the extensive
portfolio of natural areas. The Natural Area Evaluation tool, a new
addition to the Plan, will help the City prioritize management
activities in natural areas.
PROGRAMS AND PARTNERSHIPS
Renton has a long history of providing a full-service recreation
program to the community. Recreation programming connects
people, builds community, fosters volunteerism and creates
long term partnerships. Collaboration with public and private
entities have allowed Renton to expand and enhance recreation
services and programming. The Plan recommends building and
strengthening these relationships to sustain existing facilities and
expand recreational opportunities. A key element of this strategy
includes expanding the agreement with the Renton School District to
increase facility use and maximize the resources available. The City
should target partners that help to expand community events and
environmental programming, responding to the community’s desires.
STAFFING AND SUPPORT
Renton’s professional staff across all divisions are still operating
under an increased workload, with responsibilities taken on during
the Great Recession. Expanding the capacity of the City to provide for
the community will require additional support and full time positions.
Plan of Action
Each of the recommended projects in this Plan will play an important
role in creating the parks, recreation and natural areas system
envisioned by the community. To successfully carry out these
recommendations, the Parks, Recreation and Natural Areas Plan
includes a series of implementation tools and strategies to help focus
and prioritize City efforts while allowing Renton to be flexible in
responding to opportunities as they emerge.
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
xIV | CITY OF RENTON
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Decision Making Tools
Four decision making tools are included in the Plan:
1. DESIGN GUIDELINES
This tool describes what should, what could and what should not be
included in the development of each park type and includes guidance
about size and locations for future parks. Design guidelines pertain to
the physical features of a park. The management, maintenance and
operations of the sites are addressed separately.
2. NATURAL AREA EVALUATION TOOL
This tool utilizes a systematic approach to prioritizing and managing
natural areas. The inventory process and prioritization criteria
included in this tool will help the City decide which natural areas to
focus on first for natural area management plan development.
3. PRIORITIZATION CRITERIA
Drawing from the extensive public input, seven criteria have been
developed to evaluate how well a specific project supports the Plan’s
vision and goals. Scoring a project against these criteria allows for
the sorting of disparate projects into an ordered list that focuses
community resources.
4. CAPITAL AND OPERATIONS COST MODEL
The Capital and Operations Cost Model presents “planning level”
costs identified for each project recommended in this Plan. Applying
per-unit or per-acre cost assumptions, the model identifies both
capital and operations costs to develop a new project and operate
and maintain it in the future.
CAPITAL PROJECTS AND COSTS
Looking at the system as a whole, the total capital investment
needed to implement all of the recommended projects is estimated
at nearly $333,000,000 (in 2019 dollars). Of this total, 12% of
funds are for land acquisition totaling $41 million, 28% is for the
development of new parks totaling $85 million and 10% of funds are
for new sports fields totaling $33 million. Also included in this total is
nearly $29 million in major maintenance and reinvestment, 9% of the
total, for parks and facilities throughout the system. These are very
large, long-term investments and it is important to create methods to
break this cost down into more manageable pieces.
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | xV
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommended projects in this Plan are summarized by park site;
planning level costs have been totaled up by park classification
and Community Planning Area. Additionally, each of the projects
has been evaluated against the seven prioritization criteria. By
applying the Prioritization Criteria tool, the Plan includes a ranked
list of projects as they align with the plan goals, providing an order
of priority for projects that can help determine what projects to
pursue first. The prioritization is dynamic, intended to be revisited
periodically to reflect changing circumstances and conditions.
As improvements are made, the cost of operating the park system
will also increase. The cost model created for this Plan includes
an operating cost element that estimates the additional operating
funds needed for each additional project. The impact of individual
recommendations varies, but the complete system build-out will
require approximately $6,800,000 in additional operating investment.
Nearly one-third of this additional total will be the result of new or
expanded major recreation facilities, such as a multi-generational
community center and an expanded aquatic center.
PROGRAMMING PROJECTS
The programs and services recommended in the Plan were prioritized
separately based on the same set of prioritization criteria used
for capital projects. Rather than developing an exhaustive list of
ongoing Renton recreation programs, these projects represent areas
of programming that received special interest from the community
and that represent promising future directions. Recreation
programs have a reciprocal relationship with the recreation facility
recommendations. As new facilities are developed, new or additional
programs may need to be added to maximize their use. As new
program areas are explored, improvements at parks can support
these new uses and participants. Actively programming parks
increases use as well as the social and health outcomes of Renton
residents.
IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES
The Plan notes specific strategies to ensure that new development
contributes their fair share to improvements in the park system and
that future initiatives are supported by the community.
Additional strategies discuss ways in which park projects can be
combined with other public services or development projects, such
as transportation and stormwater, to maximize community benefits.
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
xVI | CITY OF RENTON
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Additionally, recreation programming serves as a community-building
resource. Similarly, programs build City partnerships, especially with
other major community resources such as the School District.
As a final part of its action plan, the Parks, Recreation and Natural
Areas Plan includes a series of concept plans to illustrate how
recommended facilities can fit into existing and proposed parks.
These concepts were created to show one vision of how these parks
can be designed, informed by the general community input of this
Plan.
Monitoring, Reviewing and Updating
The vision, goals and objectives of this Plan should serve this
community to the end of this decade and beyond. However, it will be
important to check in with the community and validate or adjust the
Plan for any major shifts in priorities or project opportunities. The
six-year period defined by the Recreation and Conservation Office
presents a good time for this check in. The implementation of this
Plan will continue well past the six-year update cycle mandated by
the State.
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
INTRODUCTION
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
xVIII | CITY OF RENTON
INTRODUCTION
The Parks, Recreation and Natural Areas Plan is the result of a collaborative
effort between community members, staff, agency representatives and elected
officials with the goal of creating a unified community vision for the future of
Renton’s parks, recreation resources and natural areas.
PURPOSE OF THE PLAN
The Parks, Recreation and Natural Areas Plan:
• Presents a long-term vision and goals for the City’s parks, recreation and natural areas and
community for the next 20 years;
• Describes current and future needs, interests and community preferences for parks, recreation
facilities and programs and natural resources;
• Identifies system-based policies, implementation strategies and an investment program to enhance
and sustain parks, recreation and natural areas as critical elements of a vibrant community;
• Provides a framework to guide the City in setting priorities, making decisions and funding
improvements and operations for Renton’s parks, recreation facilities and natural areas; and
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | xIx
• Responds to the needs of the community as well as the requirements of the State of Washington
Recreation and Conservation Office (RCO) for grant funding eligibility. Once certified, the plan will
maintain this eligibility for six years from the date of adoption.
RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER PLANNING EFFORTS
This document is structured to align with three levels of planning: the city-wide system, the Community
Planning Areas and individual park sites. This Plan implements policies presented in the Renton
Comprehensive Plan and provides specific guidance for individual Community Plans. While the City’s
Comprehensive Plan establishes the city-wide vision and framework, the Parks, Recreation and Natural
Areas Plan establishes and implements the goals and objectives. In turn, these system-wide actions and
implementation strategies will guide the individual community planning efforts. Each Community Plan will
create a finer level of detail about the specific needs, priorities and character of each of the ten individual
Community Planning Areas. The City has other system and site-specific plans in place and in progress. This
plan serves as a companion to the Trails and Bicycle Master Plan and complements the Downtown Civic
Core Vision and Action Plan. Across these plans there are many shared recommendations, including the
following:
• Provide a safe, healthy vibrant community (Comprehensive Plan);
• Create an accessible and connected system (Trails and Bicycle Master Plan);
• Enrich the community with many small scale improvements to parks, recreational opportunities
(Benson Hill Community Plan);
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
xx | CITY OF RENTON
INTRODUCTION
• Improve access to and quality of parks, recreation, and
natural areas in Benson Hill, especially for youth (Benson Hill
Community Plan);
• Protect, enhance and improve access to the natural features
and open space in the City Center including Lake Washington,
the Cedar River, and its many parks and open spaces
throughout the City Center (City Center Community Plan);
• Assess and reimagine public spaces like the Piazza and
Pavilion, and connect those spaces through an expanded
regional trail system to local destinations (Downtown Civic
Core Vision and Action Plan);
• Improve parks and urban trails like the Piazza and Renton
Connector (Downtown Civic Core Vision and Action Plan);
• Provide active and engaging public spaces (Downtown Civic
Core Vision and Action Plan);
• The Cedar Riverwalk becomes a major draw to attract
residents and visitors to experience the Civic Core and
Downtown (Downtown Civic Core Vision and Action Plan);
• Renton aspires to be a center for arts and culture where
traditional and contemporary arts thrive and creative
industries are cultivated (Arts and Culture Master Plan); and
• Preserve, document, interpret, and educate about the history
of greater Renton in ways that are accessible to diverse
people of all ages (Renton History Museum Master Plan).
PLAN DEVELOPMENT
The Parks, Recreation and Natural Areas Plan was developed through
the active participation of residents, interest groups, park users, City
staff and agency representatives who provided feedback through
a variety of meetings, open houses, surveys, questionnaires, an
interactive online mapping exercise and two rounds of inclusive
engagement. These diverse outreach activities were designed to
collect feedback from a variety of people, including different cultural
groups, ages and interests. Over 1,800 people participated in the
development of this plan.
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | xxI
INTRODUCTION
In addition to the many public involvement activities, several key
groups reviewed plan content, provided direction and coordinated
this plan with other City policies and goals.
These committees and commissions included:
• A 12-member Steering Committee, a citizen group consisting
of demographically diverse members representing a range of
interests and backgrounds;
• The 7-member Parks Commission, overseeing park and
recreation facility operations;
• The 30-member Mayor’s Inclusion Task Force, 5 of whom
conducted the inclusive engagement efforts for this planning
process;
• The 9-member Planning Commission, responsible for the
oversight of land use policies and regulations;
• Community Services Department staff, representing the front
lines of implementing recreation programs and services,
urban forestry, facilities, parks and trails maintenance,
operations, planning and CIP; and
• The City Council Committee of the Whole, providing
additional and in-depth guidance.
The resulting plan reflects the many different priorities and interests
of the Renton community. It also provides the City with the flexibility
to respond to changing community demographics and needs.
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
xxII | CITY OF RENTON
INTRODUCTION
This page intentionally left blank
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
1
THE FUTURE OF RENTON’S PARKS SYSTEM
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
2 | CITY OF RENTON
The City of Renton is poised to renew its commitment to and investment in
city parks, recreation facilities, natural areas and recreation programming.
This commitment is guided by the community’s love and enthusiasm for the
places that support Renton’s identity. Community members value Renton as
a sustainable, interconnected community, with people who work together
to promote its health and vitality, protect its natural resources, celebrate its
character and ensure its long-term dedication to a high quality of life.
THE FUTURE OF RENTON’S PARKS SYSTEM
The vision and goals presented in the Parks, Recreation and Natural Areas Plan are intended to illustrate
the community’s desired future. This framework gives the Community Services Department flexibility
in leveraging opportunities to achieve the desired goals. The vision, goals and objectives in this Parks,
Recreation and Natural Areas Plan were affirmed and refined through the public engagement process
described in Chapter 3.
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 3
VISION
The community’s vision:
Parks, Recreation and Natural Areas provide the opportunity for the community to connect to,
participate in, support and encourage a healthy environment and active lifestyle.
GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
Seven goals recognize the many benefits that park land, recreation facilities and programs and natural areas
offer the community. These goals direct the long-term improvement, maintenance and programming of
the parks, recreation and natural areas system. Each goal includes objectives – statements of actionable
direction – that can be used to measure progress towards the goals.
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
4 | CITY OF RENTON
CHAPTER ONE
GOAL A: Filling gaps in service
Expand parks and recreational opportunities in areas with an identified
need, in order to fill gaps in service and keep pace with future growth.
Objectives
A.1. Expand recreation opportunities to meet future
growth needs and planned density.
A.2. Develop parks that provide service to residences
within ½-mile of low density residential land uses
and within ¼-mile of the areas planned for high
residential density.
A.3. Design indoor and outdoor spaces for flexible use.
A.4. Increase capacity at existing parks and recreation
facilities wherever possible.
A.5. Utilize Decision Making Tools to help determine
planning, acquisition, development and restoration
projects and priorities.
A.6. Provide easily accessible information about the park
system, expanding knowledge and awareness of
recreation opportunities.
A.7. Create park master plans with community input in
conjunction with or prior to major park development
projects to achieve cohesive design and efficient
phasing.
A.8. Explore alternative service approaches to provide
recreation opportunities in parks or programmable
space; leveraging the strengths and facilities of
other organizations.
A.9. Continue to reinvest in parks and facilities to reflect
the evolving needs and desires of the community.
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 5
THE FUTURE OF RENTON’S PARK SYSTEM
GOAL B: Creating a connected system
Create a connected system of parks, corridors, trails and natural areas
that provides equitable access to recreation opportunities.
Objectives
B.1. Link parks to other community destinations in
Renton and the region such as schools, parks,
trails, natural areas, commercial areas and business
districts.
B.2. Create safe, accessible and convenient non-
motorized park access.
B.3. Complete transportation, recreation and habitat
connections across the system.
B.4. Enhance the connection between local food
production and the community through education,
awareness and community events.
B.5. Develop and implement accessible parks, facilities
and programs for all ages and abilities.
B.6. Develop and implement a consistent system of
wayfinding signage to help users navigate the parks,
recreation and natural areas system.
B.7. Encourage use of non-motorized transportation
modes to access recreation opportunities.
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
6 | CITY OF RENTON
CHAPTER ONE
Objectives
C.1. Develop, strengthen and facilitate strong
partnerships with individuals, service groups, non-
profits and other agencies and organizations to
expand recreation opportunities.
C.2. Increase internal coordination and collaboration
between City departments to maximize the public’s
access to recreation opportunities.
C.3. Coordinate planning, programming and operations
between government agencies, local school districts
and community groups to increase awareness,
availability and accessibility of recreation resources.
C.4. Formalize partnerships and agreements with
agencies, businesses and other organizations to
increase access to recreation opportunities.
GOAL C: Building partnerships
Cultivate strong, positive partnerships at the local and regional levels
with public, private and non-profit organizations to unite community
efforts to develop and sustain the park system.
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 7
THE FUTURE OF RENTON’S PARK SYSTEM
GOAL D: Creating identity
Create a distinct identity that celebrates the natural, historic and
culturally diverse character of the Renton community through park and
facility design, recreation programming, interpretation and education.
Objectives
D.1. Offer programs and events that celebrate the unique
features of Renton.
D.2. Expand water access to the community through
acquisition, facility design and programming.
D.3. Integrate cultural, historic, and place-based art and
interpretation within the park system.
D.4. Incorporate unique features into parks and facilities
to contribute to community identity.
D.5. Provide opportunities to create and appreciate art
throughout the park system.
D.6. Showcase Renton as a regional trail hub that
connects non-motorized transportation infrastructure
throughout the region.
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
8 | CITY OF RENTON
CHAPTER ONE
Objectives
E.1. Consider long-term management, staffing resources,
operations and maintenance needs when planning
capital projects and creating programs.
E.2. Consider the full operating impact of new park sites
and features prior to their development.
E.3. Consider cost recovery when developing and
implementing projects and programs.
E.4. Create community partnerships and encourage
volunteerism that contribute to the maintenance and
sustainability of the system.
E.5. Balance new acquisition and development with
the sustained maintenance of existing parks and
facilities.
E.6. Seek funding from a wide variety of sources for park
acquisition, development, maintenance and program
implementation.
E.7. Minimize impacts to the environment by
incorporating green infrastructure and promoting
water and energy efficiency and storm water
management in parks and facilities.
E.8. Enhance community awareness and involvement in
natural resource area management.
E.9. Set an example in environmental stewardship by
employing best management practices.
GOAL E: Ensuring a sustainable system
Ensure long-term economic and environmental sustainability in system
planning, design, operation, maintenance and decision making.
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 9
THE FUTURE OF RENTON’S PARK SYSTEM
GOAL F: Promoting health and community through
programming
Promote healthy and active lifestyles and build community through
programs that are inclusive, fun and responsive to the needs and
preferences of Renton’s diverse population.
Objectives
F.1. Provide flexible recreation programming that adapts
and responds to current trends and community
desires.
F.2. Expand the community’s access to fitness and
health through park and facility design, formalized
programs and events, social marketing and
education.
F.3. Provide programs and community events that
encourage interaction between neighbors and
celebrate the diversity of Renton.
F.4. Increase community awareness of the full range of
program offerings and recreation opportunities.
F.5. Create and expand program opportunities through
enhanced partnerships and volunteerism.
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
10 | CITY OF RENTON
CHAPTER ONE
Objectives
G.1. Inform the management of Renton’s natural areas
with complete inventories and management plans.
G.2. Stabilize, improve and restore Renton’s natural
areas.
G.3. Facilitate healthy stream and river corridors to
protect water quality, provide wildlife habitat and
connect people to nature.
G.4. Protect and preserve natural resources and systems
when developing or redeveloping parks and
facilities.
G.5. Monitor and manage natural areas to minimize
invasive species and improve riparian, upland and
forest habitat health.
G.6. Manage encroachments on public property to
minimize degradation to the ecosystem.
G.7. Utilize Renton’s diverse natural areas to provide
environmental education and facilitate stewardship
in the community.
G.8. Enhance and restore native forests to maximize
ecosystem services such as stormwater
management, air quality, aquifer recharge, carbon
sequestration, wildlife habitat and other ecosystem
services.
GOAL G: Protecting and conserving natural resources
Protect, conserve and enhance Renton’s diverse natural resources for
the long-term health of ecosystems, and for the benefit and enjoyment of
future generations.
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
2
EXISTING CONDITIONS
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
12 | CITY OF RENTON
Renton, Washington is at the center of the Puget Sound region. Located
at the south end of Lake Washington, the city contains 23.6 square miles
within its city limits. The city is bordered by unincorporated King County,
and the cities of Kent, Tukwila and Newcastle. Renton is situated at a key
point in the regional motorized and non-motorized transportation network.
EXISTING CONDITIONS
RENTON TODAY
Historically, Renton was a small town located between the lake and the forest. In many ways it still
retains that character. At the physical and economic core of the City, Renton’s historic downtown offers
shopping and year-round community events and activities. Uphill from Downtown Renton, the landscape
is characterized by residential development and natural areas. The City is crossed by rivers and creeks, and
its landscape is defined by riparian woodlands. The Cedar River, which winds through the heart of Renton’s
historic downtown, at one time contained the largest run of sockeye salmon in the continental United
States. The City’s river, creeks and Lake Washington are home to runs of chinook, sockeye and coho salmon.
Several factors place Renton on the threshold of change: the continuing transition of Renton’s industrial
sector and economy; continuing regional and local population growth; and the City’s location at the
crossroads of local and regional transportation networks. These factors foreshadow a new role for Renton
as an important metropolitan center in the region and a designated Regional Growth Center.
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 13
Strong Economy
Renton’s industrial sector is undergoing a transition away from heavy industrial/manufacturing with
professional and health care services now driving growth. The number of manufacturing jobs has stayed
stable, with Boeing and its suppliers maintaining substantial operations in Renton. The fastest growth
between 2011 and 2017 was in the health care services sector, with over 2,000 jobs added, reflecting Kaiser
Permanente’s investment in the area. Accommodation and food services have also grown substantially.
Major regional retailers, such as Ikea, draw shoppers to Renton and support additional jobs.
Growing and Diversifying Population
Growth patterns and demographic characteristics of Renton’s residents strongly influence recreation
interests and levels of participation, affecting the current and future need for parks, recreation and
natural areas. As of 2019, Renton has a population of 104,700; making it the eighth most populous city in
Washington State and the fourth most populous in King County.
From 2010 to 2019, the City gained 13,773 residents; an overall increase of 15.2%. During this period
Renton matched King County’s overall growth at 15.3%. The annual growth rate has averaged 1.58% for
this most recent 10 years. Growth projections, completed for the City’s Comprehensive Plan, estimate an
additional 16,700 housing units by 2035. Based on the average annual growth rate (1.58%), the population
in 2035 will be 134,548. In particular, Renton’s downtown is expected to experience considerable growth
and change because a significant portion of the area has been designated a Regional Growth Center by the
Puget Sound Regional Council.
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
14 | CITY OF RENTON
CHAPTER TWO
Renton has become increasingly more diverse since 2010, as Table
2.1 indicates. Populations identifying as Hispanic Origin, multiple
races and other races increased between 2010 and 2017. While the
mix of backgrounds continues to change in Renton, the general trend
of increased diversity is expected to continue.
Transportation Hub
Renton was originally located on Lake Washington for access to
water transportation. Today, the City’s location as a hub of regional
transportation is driving growth and change. Renton is four miles
from the Seattle Tacoma International Airport (SeaTac) and has easy
access to I-5, a key West Coast freight route. Additionally, I-405 and
State Routes 167, 169, 515 and 900 all intersect in Renton. For many
of the aforementioned reasons, Renton is also a major hub of the
growing network of on and off-street bicycle and pedestrian routes.
The importance of local and regional non-motorized transportation
has grown for both recreation and transportation purposes. In
addition to positioning Renton for economic growth, the many routes
create both transportation and access opportunities. However,
Renton’s major transportation routes often create barriers to non-
motorized transportation.
RACE AND ETHNICITY 2010POPULATION 2017POPULATION PERCENT CHANGE 2000-2017
White 49.4%53.5%4.1%
Asian 21.1%18.9%-2.2%
African American 10.4%8.4%-2.0%
Hispanic Origin (Any Race)13.1%17.5%4.4%
Other Race 0.2%10.6%10.4%
Two or More Races 4.7%7.3%2.6%
American Indian 0.5%0.3%-0.2%
Pacific Islander 0.7%0.9%0.2%
Table 2.1: Race and Ethnicity 2010-2017 City of Renton
US Census Bureau 2010 Census and 2017 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 15
EXISTING CONDITIONS
PROVIDING PARKS, RECREATION
AND NATURAL AREAS
The City of Renton acquires, builds, maintains and manages an
extensive inventory of parks and natural areas. Organizationally,
the City is divided into eight departments, each of which reports to
the Chief Administrative Officer who in turn reports to the Mayor,
City Council and ultimately the citizens of Renton. The Community
Services Department is the primary manager of the park and natural
area system and is responsible for parks, trails, urban forestry,
building structures, recreational programs, events, and volunteer
activities. In planning for Parks, Recreation and Natural Areas, the
Community Services department chiefly collaborates with two
departments. The Community and Economic Development (CED)
department is responsible for economic development, business
partnered events, development services, and planning (including
development of and updates to the Comprehensive Plan). CED is
the lead on sheparding the Parks, Recreation and Natural Areas
Plan through the SEPA environmental review process. A second
department, Public Works, has its own long-term planning processes
including the six-year Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) that
supports trails and non-motorized transportation resulting in
collaboration with planning for the parks and trails system.
The Community Services Department is composed of eight divisions,
providing the following services as defined in the City’s budget
document:
• Administration: Provides management and direction for the
entire department.
• Recreation and Neighborhoods: Promotes and supports
a more livable community by providing opportunities for
the public to participate in diverse recreational, cultural,
athletic and aquatic programs and activities. In addition, the
Recreation & Neighborhoods Division provides leadership,
guidance, and resources which connect and engage residents,
neighborhoods, businesses and the City through diverse
opportunities for partnerships, volunteers, special events,
sister cities, farmers markets and neighborhood programs.
A survey of STREAM
Team youth
participants indicated:
63% learned they
can celebrate how
people have different
languages, cultures and
abilities.
70% saw new places
when they went on
field trips
Source: STREAM Team
Outcomes Report,
Renton Recreation
and Neighborhoods
Division, 2019
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
16 | CITY OF RENTON
CHAPTER TWO
• Parks Planning & Natural Resources: Provides a
comprehensive and interrelated system of parks, recreation,
open spaces and trails that respond to locally‐based needs,
values and conditions, provides an appealing and harmonious
environment, and protects the integrity and quality of the
surrounding natural systems; creates a sustainable and
exemplary urban forest.
• Parks & Trails: Provides a safe, clean, attractive, accessible
and well-maintained environment for the public’s enjoyment
of active and passive recreational opportunities along with
natural resource and wildlife preservation and stewardship.
• Facilities: Develops and maintains City buildings and manages
the delivery of building‐related services to the public and the
City workforce in a safe, customer‐focused manner.
• Human Services: In partnership with the community, helps
provide services, resources, and opportunities so that
residents have food, clothing and shelter, are healthy and
safe and develop to their fullest capacity.
• Golf Course: Independently operates a public 18-hole, par 72
course with a driving range, pro shop and restaurant. The golf
course is a Certified Audubon Cooperative Sanctuary.
• Museum: The City’s only organization dedicated to the
preservation, documentation and education about the City’s
heritage. With the support of the Renton Historical Society,
the Museum cares for a collection of over 90,000 objects and
14,000 historic photos. The Museum also provides changing
and permanent exhibits, programs, publications, and
classroom outreach about local history.
PARK LAND AND
RECREATION FACILITIES
Renton’s parks, recreation and natural area system is comprised of
distinctive parks and popular recreation facilities, providing for a
wide range of opportunities and benefits for the community. Parks
are also a key gathering point, creating space for building community
and providing exposure to history, arts and culture. In addition,
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 17
EXISTING CONDITIONS
many parks in Renton play a critical role in preserving natural areas,
protecting wildlife and riparian habitat, conserving natural resources
and contributing to clean water and a healthy environment for city
residents.
Park Classification
The City’s park system is composed of various types of parks; each
providing unique recreation and environmental opportunities.
City parks are classified by their size, function and features. While
individual park sites function differently, they collectively meet a
variety of community and natural resources needs. In total, the City
of Renton provides over 1,200 acres of parks, natural areas and
corridors (Table 2.2). The Existing Parks and Natural Areas Map (Page
21) illustrates the location of these parks within Renton and the
classification to which each park belongs.
Table 2.2: Park Land by Classification, City of Renton
* Some developed park sites include natural areas and/or undeveloped areas
**Reflects the undeveloped flat area of the N.A.R.CO Property
NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS
Neighborhood parks are small park areas (usually 2-10 acres in size)
utilized for passive use and unstructured play. They often contain
open lawn areas and non-programmed field space, a children’s
playground, sports courts and a picnic area. Neighborhood parks
provide close-to-home recreation opportunities for nearby residents,
who typically live within walking and bicycling distance of the park.
Some larger neighborhood parks incorporate natural areas, such
as heavily wooded areas, which reduces the amount of active use
acreage at the site.
PARK CLASSIFICATION DEVELOPED PARK SITES*UNDEVELOPED SITES/NATURAL AREAS TOTAL
# of Sites Acreage # of Sites Acreage TotalAcreage % of System
Neighborhood Park 18 94.8 6 61.5 156.3 12.6%
Community Park 5 100.5 1**24.0 124.5 10.0%
Regional Park 1 51.3 ‐0 51.3 4.1%
Special Use Area 8 198.5 ‐0 198.5 16.0%
Natural Area ‐0 10 711.7 711.7 57.2%
Corridor 1 1.8 ‐0 1.8 0.1%
Total 33 446.9 16 805.2 1244.1 100.0%
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
18 | CITY OF RENTON
CHAPTER TWO
PARKS, RECRE AT ION AND NA TURAL ARE AS PLAN | 61
COMMUNITY NEEDS
POOL VISITS
CITY SPONSOREDEVENTS
PLAYGROUNDS
BASKETBALLCOURTS
12
55,599
63
SPORTS FIELDS
18
TENNISCOURTS
17
MAINTAINEDTRAIL MILES
13
SHELTERS
25
TREES in parks and
natural areas
126,400
BENCHES
302
20
1,244 ACRES
10 Natural Areas
(712 acres)
8 Special Use
Parks (192 acres)
24 Neighborhood
Parks (156 acres)
1 Regional Park
(51 acres)
1 Corridor
(2 acres)
MOWED ACRES
277
FIELD BOOKINGS
1,174
6 C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
Par
k
s
(
1
2
5
a
c
r
e
s
)
COMPONENTS OF RENTON’S PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS SYSTEM
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 19
EXISTING CONDITIONS
The City’s current inventory of neighborhood parks ranges in size
from 0.5 acres (Glencoe Park) to 23.8 acres (the undeveloped
Cleveland Richardson Property). At one end of the spectrum, seven
of the smallest sites are below the City’s minimum size threshold of
two acres. These sites are provisionally classified as neighborhood
parks but only have space to provide basic recreation opportunities,
such as a playground, open lawn and an internal pathway (e.g.,
Glencoe Park). At the other end of the spectrum, some sites
provide these facilities plus multiple sport courts, multi-use sports
fields, picnic shelters, permanent restrooms and even an indoor
neighborhood center (e.g., Kennydale Lions Park and Tiffany Park).
Six neighborhood parks are larger than 10 acres in size.
COMMUNITY PARKS
Community parks are larger sites that can accommodate organized
play and contain a wider range of facilities than neighborhood parks.
They usually have programmable sports fields and hard surface
courts, and sometimes include other major use facilities as the
central focus of the park. In many cases, they will also serve the
neighborhood park function for nearby residents. Community parks
generally average 10-25 acres in size with a substantial portion of
them devoted to active use.
Renton’s community parks range in size from 10.6 acres (Liberty
Park) to 43.4 acres (Ron Regis Park). Some, such as Cedar River Park,
are highly developed with specialized facilities, such as the Renton
Community Center, Carco Theatre and the Henry Moses Aquatic
Center. Others, such as Ron Regis Park, balance natural features with
sports fields and less intense park uses.
REGIONAL PARKS
Regional parks are large park areas (50 acres or more) that may serve
a single purpose or offer a wide range of facilities and activities. In
many cases, they also contain large portions of undeveloped natural
areas. Many regional parks are acquired because of unique features
found or developed on the site.
In Renton, Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park functions as the only
park in Renton that meets the size and unique character of a regional
park. Coulon Park, 51.3 acres in size, is a specialized waterfront park
with a variety of recreation opportunities, including restaurants,
boating facilities and a guarded beach for swimming.
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
20 | CITY OF RENTON
CHAPTER TWO
SPECIAL USE AREAS
Specialized parks and facilities include areas that provide a
specialized use or recreational activities. With the exception of the
Maplewood Golf Course (192.3 acres) and the Senior Activity Center
Property (2.8 acres), special use parks in Renton are approximately
one acre in size or less. These include the Piazza, Veterans Memorial,
Tonkin Park (with its bandstand), Sit-In Park and the Community
Garden/Greenhouse.
NATURAL AREAS
Natural areas in Renton preserve land for a variety of reasons. Some
natural areas preserve habitat or include environmentally sensitive
lands, including streams, ravines, steep hillsides and wetlands. In
other cases, these may be wooded areas that contribute to the tree
canopy and scenic views across Renton.
In Renton, natural areas range in size from 0.3 to 264.2 acres. The
vast majority of these sites are focused on water resources (rivers,
streams and wetlands) and the forested lands surrounding them.
Currently, four sites include trails or trail access, with the goal of
providing trail access to all sites as environmental constraints allow.
CORRIDORS
This category of park captures narrow swaths of land that serve as
connections between parks or to other destinations. A corridor site
can be the location of a trail or can provide a habitat linkage between
two larger areas. These sites do not typically include many park
amenities.
The City owns or controls several narrow pieces of property that
extend between park sites, creating connections within or beyond
the City’s system to other destinations in the region. All corridor
lands that are owned outright by the City are associated with the
Cedar River Trail and are located between Cedar River Trail Park,
Jones Park and Liberty Park. The City owns a total of 1.8 acres of
Cedar River Trail Corridor land. In addition to this corridor, the
City owns easements to corridors in several areas including the
Springbrook Trail between the Black River Riparian Forest and
the Renton Wetlands. Some of these areas are developed and
maintained by the City and some are managed by other entities.
INCLUSIVE PLAY
Meadow Crest
Accessible Playground
is Renton’s first
community-wide fully
inclusive playground.
The playground was
developed through
the first-of-its-kind
partnership between
the City of Renton
and Renton School
District. The 1-acre
park includes a variety
of play experiences
that build skills,
strengthen self-esteem
through graduated
challenges and support
the development of
motor skills, sensory
processing, and cause-
and-effect learning.
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
116th Ave NESE 208th StE Mercer WayTalbot Rd SNewcastle
G
o
l
f
C
l
u
b
R
d
SW 27th St
SE 168th St
SE Petrovitsky Rd
S 133rd St
124th Ave SENE 4th St
East Valley RdR
e
n
t
o
n
A
v
e
S
156th Ave SE164th Ave SESW Grady Way
SE 192nd St
W
M
e
r
c
e
r
W
a
y
Puget Dr SEBenson
D
r
S
SW 7th St
Lake
Wa
sh
ing
ton
B
lvd
NW Valley HwyHoquiam Ave NESE Petr
o
v
i
t
s
k
y
R
d
LakeWashington
Lake Youngs
Cedar
R
i
v
e
r
Panther
Lake
Lake
Boren
May Creek
Springbrook
Creek Cedar
R
ive
r
Honey DewSchool
RentonHigh School
LindberghHigh School
Fred NelsenMiddle School
Cascade
ElementarySchool
Sierra HeightsElementary School
Benson HillElementary School
John McknightJr High School
Renton TechnicalCollege
Renton ParkElementary
Talbot HillElementarySchool
Tiany ParkElementary School
HighlandsElem School
Maple HeightsElementary School
Early ChildhoodLearning Center
SartoriElementary School
HazenHigh School
KennydaleElementary School
New HorizonSchool
St. Anthony'sSchoolBlack RiverRiparian Forest
SpringbrookWatershed
Panther CreekWetlands
RentonWetlands
RentonWetlands
Panther CreekWetlands
May CreekGreenway
Honey CreekGreenway
Cedar RiverNatural Area
Ron RegisPark
MaplewoodGolf Course
Gene CoulonMemorial Beach Park
EdlundProperty
CascadePark
Cleveland /Richardson Property
KiwanisPark
Cedar RiverTrail Park
HeritagePark
PhilipArnold Park
TianyPark
SpringbrookTrail
ThomasTeasdale Park
Highlands Park andNeighborhood Center
KennydaleLions Park
WindsorHills Park
EarlingtonPark
North Highlands Park andNeighborhood Center
SpringbrookTrail
KennydaleBeach Park
May Creek Park
N.A.R.COProperty
KenyonDobson Property
CedarRiver Park
LibertyPark
RiverviewPark
Tiany Park / CascadePark Connection
MaplewoodPark
Talbot HillReservoir Park
JonesPark
Senior ActivityCenter Property
Sit InPark
GlencoePark
ParkwoodSouth Park
SE 186th PlaceProperties
BurnettLinear Park
Lake StreetOpen Space
TonkinPark
MaplewoodRoadside Park
Piazza & Gateway
Veterans Memorial Park
Sunset NeighborhoodPark
RentonMunicipalAirport
§¨¦405
§¨¦405
FAIRWOOD
KING COUNTY
TUKWILA
KENT
NEWCASTLE
MERCER
ISLAND
Meadow CrestAccessible Playground
Other Park and Recreation Facilities
Parks Provided by Others
Schools
Sources: City of Renton and King County GIS, 2019.
September, 2019.
Renton Park and Recreation Facilities
Regional Park
Community Park
Neighborhood Park
Open Space
Trail Corridor
Special Use
Future Park
Base Map Features
Renton City Boundary
Potential Annexation Areas
0 0.5 10.25
Mile
Existing Renton Parks, °
Recreation, and Natural Areas
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
22 | CITY OF RENTON
CHAPTER TWO
This page intentionally left blank
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 23
EXISTING CONDITIONS
Recreational Facilities
Renton’s parks offer a wide range of indoor and outdoor recreation
facilities, adding recreational variety to the park system. A complete
inventory of these facilities is provided in Appendix A.
PLAYGROUNDS
There are 20 parks in Renton that provide playground play
equipment. Almost all neighborhood parks feature playgrounds;
three are available in community parks and a large playground exists
in Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park, a regional park. The newest
addition, Meadow Crest Accessible Playground, is a universally
accessible facility meaning it is specially designed to support play by
children of all abilities.
Renton School District elementary schools each have a playground
that is generally available outside of school hours. This adds an
additional 13 sites for a total of 33 playgrounds in Renton.
INDOOR PROGRAMMABLE SPACES
The City of Renton has invested in several indoor recreation facilities,
which provide local, community and regional-scale recreation
opportunities. Many of the same park sites that offer rentable space
also provide indoor recreation programming space. The Renton
School District also provides indoor facilities that support recreation
as well as education.
SWIMMING POOLS/AQUATIC FACILITIES
Swimming and water access are some of the most popular seasonal
activities in Renton. Two sites - Kennydale Beach Park and Gene
Coulon Memorial Beach Park ‐ provide seasonal lifeguarded
public access to outdoor beach swimming and water play in Lake
Washington. Cedar River Park houses Renton’s aquatic facility, the
Henry Moses Aquatic Center, featuring an extensive leisure pool and
a separate lap pool. Additional indoor pools are owned and operated
at two area high schools and are programmed by the school district.
SKATE PARK
Renton’s community-scale skate park is centrally located in Liberty
Park. The 8,400 square foot facility features artwork funded by the
Renton Municipal Arts Commission 1% for the Arts and includes
obstacles for varying degrees of ability.
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
24 | CITY OF RENTON
CHAPTER TWO
WATER ACCESS FACILITIES
Several parks provide water access for boating, rowing, sailing,
canoeing and kayaking. For motorized boating, the only facility in
Renton is the eight‐lane boat launch at Gene Coulon Memorial Beach
Park providing access to Lake Washington. The facility provides 123
stalls to support boat trailer parking and is over capacity on warm
summer days. Non-motorized boat access is available at Coulon Park,
Cedar River Trail Park and Riverview Park.
DOG PARKS
The North American Refractory Company (N.A.R.CO) Property has
been serving as the site of a temporary off-leash dog park, originally
developed by a local advocacy group (Renton’s Unleashed Furry
Friends, or RUFF) in partnership with the City and is now maintained
by the City. This facility is the only formal dog park in Renton and is
heavily used. In addition, Renton and other South King County Cities
developed and help to maintain Grandview Park through a multi-
agency agreement to provide an additional off-leash area. This facility
is located in the City of SeaTac.
GOLF COURSE
The City operates the Maplewood Golf Course, an 18-hole par 72
facility. The amenities include a 30-stall covered heated driving
range, a fleet of 50 gas powered golf carts and a 15,500 sq. ft.
clubhouse that has a full-service pro shop, restaurant, lounge, patio
and banquet facilities. The course was certified as an Audubon
Cooperative Sanctuary Golf Course in 2009, the twelfth golf course in
the state to achieve this recognition.
OUTDOOR COURTS
The City of Renton provides 17 tennis courts, 11 full basketball courts
and three half courts located throughout the City. There are also two
sand volleyball courts located at Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park.
The Renton School District also provides tennis and basketball courts.
Three pickleball courts are available at Talbot Hill Reservoir Park, and
a bocce ball court is available at the Senior Activity Center.
COMMUNITY GARDENS
Renton has developed community garden sites at North Highlands
Park and near the Senior Activity Center. Garden plots (10-foot x
20-foot) can be reserved for a nominal fee through the online parks
reservation system.
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 25
EXISTING CONDITIONS
TRAILS
Renton has several miles of trails, including the popular Cedar River
Trail, Honey Creek Trail, May Creek Trail and Springbrook Trail.
Multiple future regional trail connections are planned in or near
Renton, including the Lake to Sound Trail (connects to the Interurban
Trail), the Interurban Trail, the Green River Trail, the Soos Creek
Trail, Eastrail and Lake Washington Loop. As a partner in the regional
trail system, Renton collaborates in trail planning and development
with King County, and the neighboring cities of Kent, Newcastle
and Tukwila. This partnership includes trails that cross Renton city
limits such as the May Creek Trail which will eventually connect
to Newcastle’s trail system and King County’s Cougar Mountain
Regional Wildland Park. Eight Renton parks and the Maplewood Golf
Course also have trails or trail access points to the adjacent Cedar
River Regional Trail. Outside of City-owned park land, trails are also
provided on easements owned by the City or other public entities.
INTERPRETIVE FACILITIES
Interpretive facilities such as kiosks and signs that convey the historic,
cultural and environmental context of a site can be found at varying
locations throughout the park system. One example is Washington
State’s first TRACK Trail at Cedar River Trail Park.
SPORTS FIELDS
Renton has 16 sports fields, located at 11 park sites (see Appendix
A-1). The Renton School District also provides 40 fields accessible to
the public (see Appendix A-2). The school sites add considerably to
the City’s inventory and sports groups rely on these fields for practice
and games. The school district also operates a stadium used primarily
for school events; but has also been scheduled by the City for Special
Olympics. Most of the City’s fields are designed as multi-purpose;
typically a rectangular field with one or more backstops and infields
at the field corners. These fields offer the possibility of sharing the
same space between different user groups, used for baseball or
softball in one season and soccer or rugby in another. However,
in nearly all cases only one sport can play at a time. Specialized
diamond shaped (baseball/softball) and rectangular (soccer, football,
rugby, etc.) fields also exist, mainly at school sites and community
parks. There is an agreement for a temporary cricket field at Ron
Regis Park. Complexes are increasingly a key part of competitive play.
A Complex, defined as a cluster of competitive fields that can support
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
26 | CITY OF RENTON
CHAPTER TWO
multiple games or a tournament, is not a facility Renton currently
offers.
Field Components and Condition
An important factor in the programmability of fields is the presence
of key components (such as dugouts, equipment storage and
lighting) and the condition of the fields. Appendix A-3 provides a
detailed inventory of Renton’s sports fields and their components.
In addition, a condition rating is applied to the field surface and field
components. The following indicate the criteria used to evaluate
field and component condition:
• Fields:
‐1 = poor drainage, uneven surface, frequent wear spots, no
base, rough graded
‐2 = adequate drainage, moderate base, reasonably level
playing surface, few wear spots
‐3 = irrigated, good quality base and surface, well graded
and level, minimal wear spots
• Components:
‐1 = components due for replacement, limited functionality
‐2 = components adequate; average quality, may be dated
but are still functional
‐3 = good quality or new components
Three field user categories describe the character of Renton’s existing
sports fields. These definitions help to plan for their maintenance and
FIELD USER
FIELD TYPE TOTALS
TOTAL FIELDSDIAMONDRECTANGULARMULTI- PURPOSE COMPLEX
City of Renton
Adult 4 1 8 0 13
Youth 4 1 9 0 14
Adaptive 0 0 0 0 0
Total 4 1 11 0 16
Table 2.3: City of Renton Sports Fields by User
*Note: some fields serve both youth and adults
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 27
EXISTING CONDITIONS
development based on the anticipated use. Table 2.3 summarizes
existing sports fields by field user, showing the total number of
individual fields owned by the City of Renton. The users include:
• Youth: Smaller fields that are regularly used for both youth
play and, increasingly, for older adults. All fields that are not
full size but used for league game play or practice fall in this
scale.
• Adult: Larger fields that are adequately sized for adult
play and are full sized for their intended sport fall into this
category.
• Adaptive: Fields intended for use by players with adaptive
needs, which may include all-abilities play surfaces, fall into
this category.
RECREATION PROGRAMMING
AND SERVICES
Recreation programming is a major and dynamic service provided
by the City. The Recreation and Neighborhoods Division of the
Community Services Department develops classes, events and
activities and collaborates with a variety of community partners to
expand these efforts. The combined efforts of the City and partners
are advertised to the community in the recreation program guide,
the city website, and a variety of digital marketing platforms. In order
to provide the best service to the entire community, Recreation
and Neighborhoods works closely with the City’s advisory groups,
including the Renton Youth Council, the Parks Commission, the
Senior Advisory Board and the City’s Inclusion Task Force, to track
and adapt to the changing needs and desires.
Renton’s recreation programs and services can be organized into the
following major program areas:
• Adaptive Recreation – recreation programs for individuals
with developmental and physical challenges to provide
social engagement, life enrichment and athletic program
opportunities supported by City staff (examples: Special
Olympics programming, Club Thursdays, field trips, healthy
relationship classes around finances and social media, arts
and culture classes).
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
28 | CITY OF RENTON
CHAPTER TWO
VOLUNTEERS
976
VOLUNTEEREDHOURS
3003
Park-specifi c
projects:
63
CITYSPONSOREDEVENTS
1,244 ACRES
10 Natural Areas
(712 acres)
8 Special Use
Parks (192 acres)
24 Neighborhood
Parks (156 acres)
6
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
Par
k
s
(
1
2
5
a
c
r
e
s
)
1 Regional Park
(51 acres)
1 Corridor
(2 acres)
MOWED ACRES
277
GAME PREPS
435INDIVIDUALSREGISTERED FOR
6,348
CLASSES, CAMPS AND OTHER PROGRAMS
14,720
LIFEGUARDS
103
SUMMER CAMP USERS
2,407
YOUTH SERVED
4,902
FARMERS MARKET VENDORS SERVING
66
ATTENDEES
51,000
OPERATING RENTON’S PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS SYSTEM
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 29
EXISTING CONDITIONS
• Aquatics – City Beaches and Henry Moses Aquatic Center:
operations and maintenance of pools and equipment, life
guarding, guest services, recreation programming, events,
and private rentals all supported by City staff (examples:
memberships, ticket sales, lifeguard training, free life jacket
program, summer camps, swim lessons, water walking, lap
swim, open swim, movie nights, Pooch Plunge).
• Park and Trail Use: use of any outdoor park space or park
amenity for recreational purposes that does not require
coordination or supervision by city staff (examples: walking,
jogging, hiking, biking, outdoor basketball and tennis courts,
use of outdoor exercise equipment, and playgrounds).
• Events – Sponsored, Partnered or Permitted: open to the
general public for the purpose of building community;
providing entertainment and experiences for residents; may
require registration depending on the structure or type of
event.
• Neighborhood Program: provides matching dollars for
neighborhood improvements, organizing, or for projects
developed and implemented by community members.
The program requires awardees to match their award
with contributions from their neighborhood in the form of
volunteer time, cash, or donations (examples: Winsper HOA
“Trail Revitalization Refurbishment Project,” South Renton
Connection “Farmers Market Mural Art Project,” Greenleaf
HOA “Little Free Library,” LaCrosse HOA “Community Movie
Night,” North Renton Neighborhood Association “Emergency
Preparedness Training & Kit Building,” The Pointe HOA
“Playground Improvement Project,” Hoquiam Avenue
Neighborhood Alliance “Community Cleanup & Clothing/
Food Drive Event”).
• Community Volunteer Program: projects-based volunteer
opportunities managed or overseen by staff initiated by
the City, or outside organizations, schools, or individuals
(examples: Trail Rangers, Green and Clean, Arbor Day Earth
Day, Eagle Scout projects).
• Rentals/Leases: rental of City owned buildings or spaces such
as rooms, gyms, athletic fields, park space, picnic shelters
VOLUNTEERS
976
VOLUNTEEREDHOURS
3003
Park-specifi c
projects:
63
CITYSPONSOREDEVENTS
1,244 ACRES
10 Natural Areas
(712 acres)
8 Special Use
Parks (192 acres)
24 Neighborhood
Parks (156 acres)
6
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
Par
k
s
(
1
2
5
a
c
r
e
s
)
1 Regional Park
(51 acres)
1 Corridor
(2 acres)
MOWED ACRES
277
GAME PREPS
435INDIVIDUALSREGISTERED FOR
6,348
CLASSES, CAMPS AND OTHER PROGRAMS
14,720
LIFEGUARDS
103
SUMMER CAMP USERS
2,407
YOUTH SERVED
4,902
FARMERS MARKET VENDORS SERVING
66
ATTENDEES
51,000
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
30 | CITY OF RENTON
CHAPTER TWO
and other amenities for exclusive use, one time or extended
use (categories include: Henry Moses Aquatic Center, Picnic
Shelters, Field Rentals, Indoor Facility Rentals).
• Programs: enrichment and health and wellness programs
and activities to expose residents to a variety of art, drama,
dance, civic engagement for all ages.
• Recreational Youth and Adults Sports & Leagues:
recreational and/or instructional sports programs and
activities. Participation open to all that register, no try outs
required (examples: baseball, basketball, softball, volleyball,
group swim lessons, youth tennis classes, gymnastics, Tae
Kwon Do, youth volleyball, cheerleading).
• Partnering Organizations: services provided by contracted
companies at centers such as the Renton Community
Center and Renton Senior Activity Center that improve the
community and individual well-being (examples: low cost
senior lunch program, low cost senior dental and foot care,
free tax preparation, free legal services, transportations
services, informational speakers).
• Environmental Programming: programs that expose the
community to the natural resources and habitat within
Renton. Provide educational opportunities and experiences
that cover the history of these resources and promote
conservation of them such as our Cedar River and the salmon
that live within it, natural open green spaces, community
parks, and local wildlife.
NATURAL AREAS
Natural resources can be found within existing parks of any type: at
neighborhood and community parks, special use areas and natural
areas. The City’s natural area lands, in particular, contain important
local and regional natural resources—including creek and river
floodplains, wetlands, riparian woodlands and upland forests. For
the purpose of this Plan, the term natural area is used as a category
of park land (generally kept in a less developed state) and natural
resource refers to the features of any land such as vegetation, wildlife
and salmon habitat, water resources and tree canopy. Many parks
and natural area lands protect these sensitive resources.
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 31
EXISTING CONDITIONS
Existing Portfolio
Renton’s parks play various roles in natural resource conservation.
While some developed parks are not thought of for their natural
resources, some heavily developed parks serve to protect aquifer
recharge, including Maplewood Golf Course. Other areas are
primarily undeveloped and have limited trail access (Black River
Riparian Forest and Cedar River Natural Area). Within this range
are several sites that include both developed and natural features.
Additional properties owned by the City (some managed by other
departments) also serve natural resource functions, whether they
are heavily forested or contain wetlands to help manage surface
and storm water such as the Cedar River Natural Area or the Renton
Wetlands Mitigation Bank. King County is also a major natural
area property owner in and around Renton; the City continues to
coordinate property acquisitions with neighboring jurisdictions to
create connected systems.
Most of the natural areas and the associated natural resources in
Renton are concentrated along river or stream valleys, including the
Cedar River, May Creek, Honey Creek, Soos Creek, Springbrook Creek
and Panther Creek. The Cedar River is the most prominent of these
waterways in Renton, providing some of the best salmon habitat
in King County and recharging the aquifers that are the primary
source of Renton drinking water. The Green River corridor is west of
Renton’s border, and is hydrologically connected to remnants of the
Black River. These two river systems are managed as Water Resource
Inventory Areas (WRIA) 8 (Lake Washington/Cedar/ Sammamish)
and WRIA 9 (Green/Duwamish and Central Puget Sound). Soos Creek
flows along the southeastern edge of the city. With the exception of
Springbrook Creek and the Green River, all of these creeks and rivers
drain into Lake Washington and eventually Puget Sound. Many of
these streams have been modified by manmade structures. Most of
Renton’s greenways are well connected but there are opportunities
to fill gaps where land is privately held. Soos Creek, Cedar River,
Honey Creek, May Creek and the Springbrook Watershed are
important aquifer recharge areas.
Of all the City’s
Community Planning
Areas, West Hill, Talbot,
Kennydale and City
Center have the highest
percentage of land
identified as possible
planting areas.
- Renton Urban Tree
Canopy Assessment
2018
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
32 | CITY OF RENTON
CHAPTER TWO
RENTON’S NATURAL AREAS
Renton’s natural areas provide
many community benefi ts. With
restoration eff ort, the potential
of these unique areas could be
maximized.
Restoration builds on the successes and addresses the challenges.
Carbon
Storage
Improved
Wildlife Habitat
Invasive
Species
Removal
Healthy
Waterways
Recreation
Enhancements
Water
Quality
RESTORATION PROVIDES BENEFITS IN A MYRIAD OF WAYS
CHALLENGESSUCCESSES
Soil Erosion
Control
Water
Filtration
Air
Purifi cation
Community
Health
Creative
Inspiration
SUCCESSES AND CHALLENGES OF RENTON’S NATURAL AREAS
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 33
EXISTING CONDITIONS
WETLANDS, RIPARIAN CORRIDORS
AND FLOODPLAINS
A sizeable portion of the natural acreage in Renton is classified as
wetlands, riparian corridors or floodplains. Local streams are low to
moderate gradient, with low lying floodplains that include wetlands.
Some of these wetlands are open and grassy, while other areas have
woodlands dominated by maple, cottonwood and alder (with ash
trees present, particularly at the Black River Riparian Forest area).
Renton has fairly extensive floodplains, some of which have been
developed. Floodplains are concentrated along the Cedar River,
May Creek, Soos Creek and the Green River. The Black River area
has experienced extensive flooding and is managed by the King
County Flood Control District. Riparian corridors within Renton are
somewhat discontinuous. Undeveloped stretches cut through the
city and provide green space near many homes and neighborhoods.
The May Creek, Soos Creek and Green River form greenbelts
that roughly follow the northeast, southeast and southwest city
boundaries, respectively. The Cedar River bisects the city, especially
through the downtown area. A network of freshwater marshes and
forested wetlands exists in the western part of Renton, including
the Black River Riparian Forest area. There are over 500 acres of
riparian woodland (North Pacific Lowland Riparian Forest and
Shrubland) within Renton, and over 120 acres of Temperate Pacific
Freshwater Emergent Marsh. Within Renton’s park system, there
are approximately 170 acres of riparian woodland and 30 acres of
Temperate Pacific Emergent Marsh.1
UPLAND FORESTS
In addition to the forested areas of wetland and riparian corridors,
nearly 3,000 acres of additional public and private land in Renton
are classified as upland forest2. The upland forest lands across the
city are concentrated along steep bluffs and river corridors. Within
Renton park lands, approximately 775 acres are forested, roughly
65% of all park land. The dominant trees noted in the City’s Tree
Inventory are big leaf maple, cottonwood, red alder and Douglas fir.
1 2010 USGS Gap Analysis http://gapanalysis.usgs.gov/;
no updated data available since 2010.
2 USGS Gap Analysis - this includes forest on private property and may include
areas outside of the city limits due to the margin of error in the analysis.
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
34 | CITY OF RENTON
CHAPTER TWO
All of Renton’s forests have been logged in the past and are in varying
stages of recovery from this initial disturbance. There is no true old
growth forest within the city, though there may be individual old
growth trees.
STREET TREES
Street trees, defined as trees growing in Renton’s rights-of-way, are
an important part of the urban forest, supplementing the larger
forested lands. These trees provide the general benefits of larger
stands of trees and contribute directly to the beautification of the
city. In 2007, the City completed a public property tree inventory
and assessment that individually counted all trees in rights‐of‐way
and parks. In addition to the location, type and number of trees, the
assessment provides information on management issues and health
of the trees. The inventory and assessment identified over 10,000
street trees and 20,370 park trees. In addition to these trees, which
exist in more developed environments, the inventory also estimates
the number of trees within Renton’s natural area lands at over
106,069.
TREE CANOPY
The total of the area covered by trees in the forested land, street
trees and trees on private property is the urban tree canopy. Renton
completed the Urban Tree Canopy Assessment in July 2011 and
again in November 2018. This assessment involves mapping the
tree canopy based on satellite imagery with the express purpose
of quantifying the environmental benefits of the canopy and to
establish data points to measure change over time. Results in 2018
indicate total canopy coverage of 4,382 acres, or 29.3% of the area of
the City in 2017. This is an increase of approximately 95 acres or ~0.6
percent from 28.7 percent canopy coverage in 2010.
Natural Area Condition
Like all urban “natural areas” in the greater Seattle region, Renton’s
natural areas were influenced by logging or farming prior to
urban development. Now, they are influenced by their developed
surroundings. In most cases, natural areas are recovered or are still
recovering naturally. However, these areas often include invasive
species, such as ivy, blackberry, knotweed, garlic mustard, among
others. These invasive species can inhibit tree growth, outcompete
native plants in the understory and form monocultures. If left
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 35
EXISTING CONDITIONS
Urban tree canopy
covers 29% of Renton’s
land. An additional 20%
of the city’s land area
not presently occupied
by tree canopy is
suitable for tree
plantings.
- Renton Urban Tree
Canopy Assessment
2018
unchecked, they can spread and significantly degrade habitat quality
for native wildlife, as well as visual appearance.
The size, shape, ecological condition, and isolation of Renton’s
natural areas all influence how well they can sustain themselves,
and what wildlife can live in them. As a general rule, larger, more
connected habitats have greater species richness, or biological
diversity (biodiversity). Habitats can be continuously connected via
a corridor, or in a discontinuous manner referred to as “stepping
stone” habitats. Most of Renton’s natural areas are not well
connected to one another although the city includes some important
natural area connections such as Honey Creek and May Creek. The
May and Honey Creek Greenways are nearly connected to Cougar
Mountain Regional Park, which in turn connects east to the Cascades.
The Cedar River Corridor is reasonably well connected from east of
I-405 to the Cascade Mountains.
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES
The City of Renton has several unique areas of habitat, many of
which coincide with its wetlands and water resources. While the
Cedar River supports major fish runs, Springbrook Creek, Honey
Creek and May Creek also provide habitat for salmonids. The Black
River Riparian Forest provides habitat for over 50 species of birds,
including herons and eagles, and many small mammals.
The Cedar River, May Creek and Panther Creek corridors have forest,
meadow and shrub habitats that provide shelter and food for many
species.
Beyond watersheds, salmon and wildlife habitat, Renton’s history
is steeped in forestry. From its early naming after Captain William
Renton (a lumberman), to its ten-year status as a Tree City USA, the
City of Renton values its trees.
Renton has managed trees for many years and in 2008 embarked
upon a formal urban forestry program. In 2009, City Council
approved the 2009 Urban and Community Forestry Development
Plan, a legacy program that continues to guide the City’s urban
forestry efforts.
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
36 | CITY OF RENTON
CHAPTER TWO
This page intentionally left blank
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
3
COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
38 | CITY OF RENTON
Connecting our community to the environment and promoting healthy
lifestyles is critical to Renton’s vision for parks, recreation and natural areas.
Similarly, linking our community to park resources, and understanding our
community’s recreation needs, are foundational to this planning process. The
Parks, Recreation and Natural Areas Plan is grounded in an extensive public
involvement process that utilized new approaches to outreach. For this Plan,
the Community Services Department piloted an inclusive outreach strategy,
further integrated online input opportunities and provided materials in three
languages.
COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT
This chapter summarizes the themes that emerged from community input and provides an overview of the
public involvement activities and city meetings that were part of the planning process.
KEY THEMES
Key themes emerged through the layering of community engagement activities, providing insights into
areas of emphasis for the community. These themes helped in the interpretation of demand for parks,
facilities and programs and in shaping the vision, goals and recommendations for this Plan.
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 39
JAN
2019
PROJECT
LAUNCH
FEB
2019
MARCH
2019
APRIL
2019
JUNE
2019
MAY
2019
JULY/AUG
2019
SEPT/OCT
2019
NOV
2019
DRAFTPLAN
COUNCIL
CONSIDERS
PLAN
ADOPTION
WINTER2019
COMMUNITY
OPEN HOUSE #1
COMMUNITY
OPEN HOUSE & ONLINE
OPEN HOUSE #2
COMMUNITY
OPEN HOUSE & ONLINE
OPEN HOUSE #3
ONLINE MAP
SURVEY
STAKEHOLDER
INTERVIEWS
ONLINE PUBLIC REVIEW AND COMMENT
STEERING COMMITTEE
MEETING #2STEERING COMMITTEE
MEETING #1
INCLUSIVE
OUTREACH INCLUSIVE OUTREACH
COMMUNITY PRIORITIES SURVEY
Increase Connections and Trails
Trail-related recreation, trail connections and bicycle and pedestrian access to parks came up in
every public involvement activity. This is consistent with findings from the Trails and Bicycle Master
Plan, and with regional, statewide and national trends. There were many specific comments about
ways to enhance trail connectivity and use in Renton, including specific suggestions about particular
connections such as Soos Creek and the Sam Chastain Waterfront Trail.
In the online extension of Open House #2, walking or biking on a trail was one of the top two most
frequently selected answers to the question “Which of the following features or activities are most
important to have in the parks, recreation and natural areas system?”, out of ten answer choices.
Protect and Conserve Natural Areas
Natural areas continue to be a major area of interest across the Renton community, especially the
protection and conservation of natural areas and the ability of the public to access nature. According to
public feedback, natural areas are also highly valued for outdoor recreation and for the opportunities they
create to instill a stewardship ethic and sense of ownership among residents.
As revealed in the community priority survey, natural areas are used at least occasionally by most of
Renton’s residents, with over 70% saying they walk/hike on a trail or visit a natural area at least two times a
year. Over 30% report visiting more than 10 times per year. In Open House #2, participants ranked natural
areas as their top priority among the four park types. Natural areas and access to nature came up in every
other public engagement opportunity, highlighting the importance of nature in the park system. Specific
public comments on the topic of natural areas included identifying and obtaining funding for corridor
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
40 | CITY OF RENTON
CHAPTER THREE
expansion and restoration, removing invasive species,
supporting salmon habitat, sustaining the tree
canopy, ensuring safety within remote places and
providing ongoing monitoring and maintenance.
Prioritize Water Access
Water access has been a consistently popular feature
of parks across community input. This includes Lake
Washington, the Cedar River and even interest in
interactive fountains in addition to Renton’s natural
bodies of water.
The interactive map results highlighted the attraction
of sites with water access. Responses to the question
“Which Renton parks do you use?” provided
additional indication that water access and the ability
to interact with water is a highly valued feature in
Renton parks.
Maintain and Sustain the Park
System
Public engagement results revealed that the
Renton community recognizes the importance of
maintenance, and the need for funding to sustain
services. At Community Open House #1, participants
commented on the need for increased maintenance
MAP-BASED DATA POINTS FROM COMMUNITY MEMBERS
1,473
Most heavily used parks are near water
(Lake Washington and the Cedar River)
Heat map of the responses to “Which Renton parks do
you use?” Color shifts from blue to red where more pins
have been placed. The most used parks are along the
Cedar River and Lake Washington.
In Open House #2 participants built a mood board by adding images,
primarily focused on nature and water access.
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 41
COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT
and the need for funding, a topic that also came up in stakeholder
interviews. The interactive map exercise included questions about
improvements needed at parks and barriers to using parks. Whether
interactive map respondents provided park-specific feedback or just
made a general comment, park maintenance with a focus on the
availability of open, clean restrooms was frequently noted.
The Community Priority Survey revealed that the majority (62%) of
Renton residents are satisfied with the level of parks maintenance.
When asked about funding priorities, 40% of survey respondents
rated improving maintenance and cleanliness as extremely important
with another 38% rating this as important (see figure 3.1). This was
second only to improving safety in terms of priority. Maintenance
issues reported by the public are sometimes associated with the
impacts of homelessness on parks, which is an ongoing and resource-
intensive challenge in the community. Increased programming in
parks, while dependent upon staff capacity, can enhance perceptions
of safety.
Improving safety in parks, recreation facilities, and natural areasImproving maintenance and cleanliness of parks, recreation facilities, and natural areasAdding new parks and expanding natural areas throughout Renton neighborhoodsImproving accessibility of parks and recreation facilities for seniors and those with disabil ities
Outreach and communication to residents
Improving accessibility of natural areas... for seniors or those with disabilities
Offering more recreational programs
44%
40%
30%
27%
24%
23%
23%
29%
38%
30%
29%
32%
27%
30%
21%
19%
24%
32%
29%
36%
34%
5%
2%
9%
7%
9%
9%
7%
1%
8%
4%
5%
5%
6%
5 - Extremely important 4 3/(NR)2 1 - Not at all important
Figure 3.1: Community Priority Survey, 2019 Results on Funding Priorities
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
42 | CITY OF RENTON
CHAPTER THREE
Invest in Parks and Facilities
The City’s parks and recreation facilities are important to Renton’s
quality of life. The Renton community continues to be interested
in adding new parks to the park system both to keep pace with
growth and to fill gaps in park access. Participants in public
engagement activities also indicated areas where park and recreation
development could focus, such as parks in the Cedar River Corridor
and trails around May Creek. Other locations within the city that
were identified as needing additional parks and facilities are Benson
and Talbot planning areas.
Consistent with the 2011 Plan is the emphasis on reinvesting in and
renovating existing parks. Across all activities, participants reported
using existing parks near their homes frequently, and brought up
the need for improvements to parks and accessible restrooms,
water fountains and more benches and seating areas. Improving
neighborhood parks was a top priority for participants in the inclusive
engagement activities. Participants in multiple activities brought up
the importance of accessibility for people with disabilities. Through
the interactive mapping exercise, participants made 559 park-specific
suggestions about how to improve Renton’s existing parks.
According to public input, new recreation facilities are also desired.
Specific ideas suggested through the interactive mapping exercise
were pickleball courts, a climbing wall, more dog parks, artificial
turf sports fields, exercise stations and new or upgraded play areas.
According to the community priority survey, top facility investment
priorities are a year-round farmers market, enclosing the aquatic
center and building an all-weather sports field complex.
Focus on Healthy, Community-Oriented
Programming
Renton residents recreate for health and fitness reasons, including
mental health benefits associated with social engagement.
Competitive sports activities, fitness activities, swimming, paddling
activities and programs experience high levels of participation.
Several comments were received regarding the availability of
programming associated with these activities, as well as the quality,
quantity and availability of facilities.
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 43
COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT
There is interest in expanding the capacity of the Henry Moses
Aquatic Center for swimming programs by covering the lap pool for
year-round use. Senior programs and activities and youth programs
and activities were topics of interest in multiple engagement
activities. Overall, there were many comments about expanding
opportunities for physical exercise for all ages and abilities. For
example, participants noted that improving the quality or increasing
the quantity of sports facilities are ways to make these facilities more
accessible and increase activity among residents.
In addition to programs and facilities that support activity and health,
many public involvement comments reflected a need for recreation
opportunities that build community and/or reflect the needs of the
entire community, such as the popular citywide special events and
neighborhood events.
According to community priority survey results, a majority of
residents say offering more recreational programs is important. For
people who do participate in programs, the highest frequencies of
use are for citywide events and for youth and adult sports leagues.
68%
57%
45%
45%
45%
43%
42%
40%
22%
28%
40%
40%
52%
40%
56%
43%
10%
16%
15%
15%
4%
17%
3%
18%
+58
+41
+30
+30
+41
+27
+39
+22
Year-round Farmers Market
Enclose the aquatic center so it can be used year-round
Build a new all-weather multi-use fi eld complex
Build a new multi-generati onal centerPaved multi-use trails for walking and biking
Create playgrounds that have unique play equipment
Neighborhood parks
Expand the aquatic center
Invest more/ Should invest Same amount/ No opinion/ (NR)Invest le ss/ Should not invest
Net Invest
Figure 3.2: Community Priority Survey, 2019 Results on Facility Investment Priorities
COMMUNITY MEMBERS PARTICIPATED IN 3 OPEN HOUSES
(in-person and online)
623
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
44 | CITY OF RENTON
CHAPTER THREE
Infuse Arts, Culture and Community Identity
Arts, culture and Renton’s community identity came up throughout
the public engagement activities. Citywide and neighborhood events
were noted by many participants as important opportunities to build
community identity and incorporate arts and culture. Participants in
the inclusive engagement activities placed a priority on opportunities
to engage in arts and culture activities during Round 1 community
conversations. Open House #2 results prioritized citywide events
and arts and culture events as the top priorities. This correlates with
the event priorities identified by Round 2 inclusive engagement
participants.
Build on Partnerships
There is a continued interest in building on partnerships, exploring
new partnerships and working collaboratively in new ways. The need
to establish and coordinate partnerships with a variety of groups
was noted throughout the public engagement process. There were
many general comments about the need to continue or expand
partnerships for programming or facility use with service groups,
environmental groups, ecumenical organizations and educational
institutions. Some participants noted that the City could coordinate
with multiple partners on regional projects, such as salmon habitat
restoration. In addition, stakeholders recognized that volunteers
and active community members, with more guidance from the City,
represent a considerable potential to provide enhanced programs
and events.
Specific partnership ideas were suggested, such as collaboration with
non-profit partners, teachers and the Renton School District to make
use of parks for outdoor science, technology, engineering and math
(STEM) activities. An idea for centralized scheduling for fields and
facilities was also suggested at the internal/external workshop.
PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT ACTIVITIES
The planning process incorporated a variety of community
engagement opportunities in different formats and offered them
at different times over the course of the year. A multi-layered,
multifaceted outreach approach broadens participation by allowing
people to participate on their own terms and to their own interest
level. While some forums engaged more participants than others,
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 45
COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT
each activity was included to gain perspectives from the entire range
of the Renton community. This “layering” of activities ensured that a
variety of interests and priorities would be represented in this Plan.
This section summarizes the public involvement activities. See
Appendix D for a summary of outreach methods.
• Community Priority Survey: The survey was conducted
between July 10th and August 15th, 2019 by EMC Research
using a methodology that randomly selected a sample of
addresses within Renton city limits to receive the survey.
The survey closed with 325 responses from selected Renton
residents, providing a statistically valid representation of
Renton residents and an overall margin of error of +/- 5.4
percentage points at a 95 percent confidence level. Surveys
were mailed to randomly selected addresses within Renton
city limits, and respondents were able to respond by either
completing a paper copy and returning it via mail, or by going
to a secure website link and completing the survey online.
This method was chosen to reach a broader portion of the
population than other available methods. The survey was
offered in English, Spanish and Vietnamese.
• Community and Online Open House Events: Three Open
Houses were held during the planning process, offering open
10%
7%
6%
5%
5%
5%
17%
3%
2%
6%
7%
8%
32%
5%
5%
17%
33%
24%
32%
68%
71%
56%
42%
44%
8%
14%
12%
14%
11%
18%
1%
3%
2%
2%
2%
1%
Attend a city-sponsored event such as Renton River Days…
Play in an adult sports league
Play in a youth sports league
Attend a neighborhood event like a movie night or community block party
Attend an outdoor live performance - such as a concert
Attend a cultural or arts event like the Food Truck Night or art fairs
10+ times a year 5-9 times a year 2-4 times a year Once or less Didn't know existed (No Response)
Figure 3.3: Community Priority Survey, 2019 Results on Most Frequently Used Programs
STATISTICALLY VALID COMMUNITY SURVEY PARTICIPANTS
325
Percent that use a neighborhood park 5+ times a year by region
90%
73%
57%
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
46 | CITY OF RENTON
CHAPTER THREE
opportunities for all community members to provide input
during the update of the Parks, Recreation and Natural Areas
Plan. Each open house was paired with an online open house
to expand participation to those members of the public who
were unable to attend in person.
-Community Open House #1 and Online Interactive
Mapping: The first open house event focused on how
the community enjoys parks, recreation, trails and
natural areas. Small groups discussed big and little
ideas for improvements and explored different user
perspectives, sharing their ideas with the larger group.
At this first open house, 55 community members signed
in. The online extension for the first open house was
the online interactive mapping exercise. The Interactive
Map provided an input opportunity for community
members who couldn’t attend Community Open House
#1. The primary function of the Interactive Map was to
re-create the open house exercise, which explored how
participants use parks and where big and little ideas could
improve the system. In total, 1,473 points were placed
Table 3.1: Open House #2 Combined Results on Park Priorities
OPEN HOUSE 2
% OF TOTAL OPENHOUSE RESPONSES
ONLINE RESPONSE
% OF TOTAL OPENHOUSE RESPONSES
TOTAL PERCENT OF TOTAL
Natural Areas: Examples
include Black River Riparian
Forest, Cedar River Natural
Area and May Creek Greenway
123 36%145 39%268 37%
Neighborhood Parks: Examples
include Sunset Neighborhood
Park, Cascade Park and
Heritage Park
85 25%96 26%181 25%
Special Use Parks: Examples
include parks with unique
features such as off-leash dog
park, community garden, or
farmers market
79 23%60 16%139 19%
Community Parks: Examples
include Liberty, Cedar River,
Ron Regis and Highlands Parks
54 16%73 20%127 18%
ONLINE MAP SURVEY PARTICIPANTS
634
45%
youth
• Youth park use is more focused on gathering with friends and family; playing sports
• Adult park use is more focused on exercise; bringing kids to play
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 47
COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT
on the map each representing unique input from the 643
participants.
-Community Open House #2 and Online Extension: The
second open house was scheduled to coincide with
opening day of the Renton Farmers Market on June 4,
2019 and was structured as a drop-in session held in
the adjacent Renton Pavilion Event Center. Participants
at this event confirmed the vision and goals of the
Plan; created a mood board (collage) representing the
character or identity for Renton’s system; and prioritized
events and park types. Approximately 150 participated,
and of those participants, 128 signed in. The open house
activities were adapted to an online format that was
available in English, Spanish and Vietnamese from June
4th through June 30th. The online extension of the open
house attracted a total of 364 responses, including 186
respondents who reached the end of the questions.
-Community Open House #3 and Online Extension: The
third open house took place on October 3, 2019. The
focus of this event was on potential improvements;
participants reviewed and discussed four new or revised
Table 3.2: Open House #2 Combined Results on Event Priorities
OPEN HOUSE
% OF TOTAL OPENHOUSE RESPONSES
ONLINE RESPONSE
% OF TOTAL ONLINE RESPONSES TOTAL PERCENT OF TOTAL
Citywide Events: Examples
include Renton River Days and
Clam Lights
99 29%135 37%234 33%
Arts & Culture: Examples
include Food Truck Night and
art fairs
124 37%103 29%227 32%
Neighborhood Events:
Examples include
Neighborhood Movie Nights
and Community Potluck
Barbecues
78 23%70 19%148 21%
Community Events: Examples
include Bike Rodeo & Family
Safety Fair and the Pooch
Plunge
37 11%53 15%90 13%
TOP TWO ANSWERS
What is important to you
when you recreate?
Source: Online Open House #2
53%
115 votes
Spending time in nature,
hiking or observing wildlife
41%
89 votes
Walking or biking on a trail
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
48 | CITY OF RENTON
CHAPTER THREE
park concepts and participated in an interactive poll
about a series of 21 images of features that could
be included in Renton parks. A final exercise allowed
participants to indicate which of the project prioritization
criteria were most important to them. Approximately 43
people participated in-person, and an online open house
(replicating all of the exercises and information) reached
another 194 people.
• Inclusive Engagement: Through the Inclusive Engagement
effort, Renton Community Services recruited five Community
Conversation leaders from the Mayor’s Inclusion Task Force
to conduct outreach. Each leader received training, support,
materials and a small stipend, with the charge of conducting
two rounds of community conversations during the planning
process. The first round of Community Conversations
included 11 sessions during April 2019 that involved a total
of 99 community members who are culturally, ethnically and
linguistically diverse and spanned a range of ages. The first
round explored how these participants use parks, recreation
programs and natural areas including their big or little ideas.
The second round included eight community conversations
attended by a total of 98 community members. The second
round focused on how participants would improve the
system, including where they would invest in events and new
features. Supporting materials in both rounds were available
in English, Spanish and Vietnamese languages.
• Steering Committee: The 12-member Steering Committee
met two times during the planning process (April 2019 and
September 2019) to advise and provide direction. Between
COMMUNITY PARTNERS INTERVIEWED
5ONLINE AND IN-PERSON PLATFORMS PROMOTED ENGAGEMENT OPPORTUNITIES
(Surveys, questionnaires, advertising
and interpretation provided in Renton’s
3 most frequently spoken languages:
English, Español, and Việt ngữ)
16
Building on relationships with:
• Renton School District
• Kaiser Permanente
• Renton Housing Authority
• Renton Chamber of Commerce
• SECO Development
Hello!
¡Hola!
Xin chào
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 49
COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT
meetings, committee members reviewed materials and
attended community open houses as they were available.
The committee consisted of a demographically diverse group,
representing a range of interests, ages and backgrounds.
Some Steering Committee members also served on the
Steering Committee for the 2011 Plan, providing continuity.
• Stakeholder Interviews: Five interviews were held in
February, March and September 2019. Their purpose was
to engage individuals or small groups (see Appendix D) with
specific interests in the parks, recreation and natural areas
system in Renton to discuss their perspective on changes
in the community, how people engage with the system and
how to improve parks, recreation and natural areas. These
individual perspectives helped the planning team identify
issues that were explored in the Plan update process.
• Staff Workshop: Staff participated in a kickoff meeting at
the beginning of the planning process. The April 2019 staff
workshop convened nine leaders in the Community Services
Department to discuss how the City can evolve its services
to meet the changing community needs in Renton through a
scenario exercise.
• Internal/ External Workshop: The Internal/External
Workshop took place in March 2019 and invited nine
partners from nearby agencies and non-profit organizations,
along with City of Renton Community Services Department
staff. The workshop focused on identifying changes that are
impacting parks and recreation needs in Renton and the
surrounding region since the Parks, Recreation and Natural
Areas Plan was last updated in 2011. The participants were
INCLUSIVE CONVERSATION LEADERS
5
COMMUNITY MEMBERS THROUGH INCLUSIVE OUTREACH
197
• Budgeting exercise allocated the most $ to improving existing parks
• Support gathering with friends and family and sports
REACHED
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
50 | CITY OF RENTON
CHAPTER THREE
also asked to consider the collaborations and partnerships
that exist or that could be built to expand the opportunities
for residents throughout the area.
• Project Website: Throughout the process, the
rentonparksplan.com project website has served as a one-
stop online portal for information related to the planning
process, updating and educating the community about
the Plan. The website includes a library of all planning
documents, a calendar of events and a link to provide
feedback and comments.
• Online Comments: During the planning process, comments
received through the project website and by email were
collected, tracked, reviewed and considered. A total of 34
comments were received and considered during the planning
process.
CITY MEETINGS AND
COORDINATION
In addition to the broader public and stakeholder engagement
activities, the planning process has also drawn guidance from a
broader group of City elected and appointed officials.
• Commission Meetings: The Parks and Planning Commissions
were involved and informed throughout the process. The
Parks Commission received formal updates on the planning
process at their March, May, October, and November 2019
meetings.
• Committee of the Whole (COW) Briefings: The Council
Committee of the Whole received briefings on the planning
process in February, May, September, and November 2019.
• Review and Adoption Meetings: The plan review process
includes meetings with the Parks Commission, the Planning
Commission and the Planning and Development Committee
of the City Council. The final draft plan will be brought to the
City Council in consideration for adoption in January 2020.
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
4
COMMUNITY NEEDS
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
52 | CITY OF RENTON
COMMUNITY NEEDS
To identify needs across Renton’s multifaceted park system, the community
needs analysis evaluated existing park land, recreation facilities and programs,
natural areas and trail access. The assessment of Renton’s community needs
is a detailed analysis that identifies the amount of land, number and types of
facilities and variety of programs that are needed now, and in the future. The
Parks, Recreation and Natural Areas Plan incorporates new information and
analysis to fully update the community needs analysis. This chapter describes
the analysis process and summarizes key findings.
WASHINGTON’S RECREATION
CONSERVATION OFFICE GUIDELINES
At the statewide level, Washington’s Growth Management Act (GMA) recommends that communities
provide an adequate level of parks and recreation service for the public, and to address existing and future
needs. Communities have flexibility in determining appropriate service levels and methods for identifying
needs, as the GMA goals do not specifically define an adequate level of service or specific requirements for
identifying needs.
As the primary provider of state funding for parks, recreation and natural areas, the state’s Recreation and
Conservation Office (RCO) provides guidance for determining needs. While many communities rely solely on
numerical level of service (LOS) standards for identifying a specific ratio of needed park land to population,
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 53
there is increasing emphasis on promoting quality of and access to parkland, as well as gauging public
satisfaction. The RCO has developed a LOS tool that assists agencies in evaluating their level of service
at a city-wide level or within a smaller area. This tool is based on three sets of criteria: quantity, quality
and distribution and access. The RCO tools are designed to allow agencies to use them as provided or to
modify them to suit local needs. Table 4.1 includes the suggested criteria and potential indicators that are
recommended for periodic evaluation of the City’s level of service.
For each indicator, the tool suggests rankings from A (highest level) to E based on a range of results. For
example, if the percent of the population satisfied is over 65%, the RCO tool recommends an “A” level of
service. The level of service may vary from area to area but a city-wide average LOS ranking can be used as
a standard to evaluate conditions within a smaller area. Building from the RCO recommendations, this Plan
establishes need based on the criteria (Table 4.1 on the next page) considering quantity, and quality, with an
emphasis on distribution and access.
PARK NEEDS
Renton residents desire a quality park system that provides a variety of recreation experiences across the
city. However, existing park land is not equally distributed, which means that not all residents have equal
access to developed parks, recreation facilities, programs and natural areas. To help determine park land
needs, a GIS analysis evaluated access to existing park sites, based on the routes people travel to reach
these parks (see Developed Park Access Map on page 56). The analysis is based on the assumption that
most residents should have access to developed parks and natural areas within one-quarter to one-half-mile
(walking/biking distance) from their home or place of employment. This assumption is supported by the
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
54 | CITY OF RENTON
CHAPTER FOUR
emerging national standard that all people should have a park within
a 10 minute walk, endorsed by the National Recreation and Parks
Association (NRPA), the Trust for Public Land and the Urban Land
Institute.
By examining the gaps in service, the City can see where additional
park land, facilities, programs and natural area land is needed. Land
needs were identified city-wide and within each Community Planning
Area. The quantity of land is derived from the number of parks
needed to fill the geographic gaps in service and the recommended
size of parks, by category (as established by the City’s design
guidelines).
RCO PROPOSED INDICATOR
Quantity Criteria
Number of Parks and Recreation Facilities % difference between existing and desired quantity or per capita
average
Facilities that Support Active
Recreation Opportunities
% of facilities that support or encourage active (muscle-powered)
recreation
Facility Capacity % of demand met by existing facilities
Quality Criteria
Agency-Based Assessment % of facilities fully functional per agency guidelines
Public Satisfaction % of population satisfied
Distribution and Access Criteria
Population within Service Areas % of population within 0.5 mi of a neighborhood park/trail; 5 mi of
a community park/trail; and 25 mi of a regional park/trail
Access % of facilities that can be accessed safely by foot, bike or public
transportation
Table 4.1: Recreation and Conservation Office LOS Tool
Source: Washington State RCO Funding Board, Manual 2, Planning Policies and Guidelines, April 2019
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 55
COMMUNITY NEEDS
Access to Developed Parks
Most cities strive for a park system that provides access to basic
recreation amenities within at least one half-mile of home or work.
In Renton, as in most communities, the half-mile walking distance
(roughly equivalent to a 10 minute walk at average walking speed) is
the greatest distance most pedestrians are willing to walk to reach a
destination.
As illustrated by the Developed Park Access map on page 56, some
Community Planning Areas contain multiple parks in close proximity
and other areas are underserved, even when considering parks
provided by other jurisdictions. There are large gaps in park service in
some residential areas in the Kennydale, East Plateau, Benson, Talbot
and West Hill Community Planning Areas1.
Access to Developed Parks
by Planned Density
Higher density development creates a greater demand for parks
and public facilities. Parks in these areas must have a capacity to
serve a large number of people. For this reason, the assessment
crosschecked park access with zoning designations to indicate areas
where existing or planned high density residential2 and commercial3
uses could draw a high concentration of people. As illustrated by
the Developed Park Access & Residential Density Map on page 58,
many high-density residential zones do not have local parks within
a quarter-mile of potential park users today. In Community Planning
Areas such as East Plateau and Benson that have gaps in access,
developed parks are particularly important. The Edlund Property and
Family First Community Center are particularly well positioned to
serve a high-density corridor in the Benson area. High-density areas
require more park capacity to serve the greater number of residents
in the immediate area, and therefore, should have parks distributed
at a closer one quarter-mile service area to provide walkable access
and a quality park experience.
1 For more information about Community Planning Areas see Chapter 5
2 Residential zoning categories: R-10 and higher.
3 Commercial zoning categories: Urban Center (UC), Commercial Arterial (CA),
Center Village (CV), Center Downtown (CD) and Commercial Office Residential
(COR). All of these zones allow high density residential mixed use with
conditions; for the purposes of this map they considered as commercial areas.
The majority of
residents (64%) are
satisfied overall with
the parks, recreation,
and natural areas
system in Renton.
There is very little
difference in opinion
across age groups,
gender, ethnicities,
geography, and
between households
with children vs. those
without.
– Community Priority
Survey 2019
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
56 | CITY OF RENTON
CHAPTER FOUR
116th Ave NEE Mercer WayTalbot Rd SNewcastle
G
o
l
f
C
l
u
b
R
d
SW 27th St
SE 168th StPark Ave NSE Petrovitsky Rd
S 133rd St
124th Ave SEEdmonds Ave NE1
5
4
t
h
P
l
S
E
NE 4th St
SE May Va
l
l
e
y
R
d
R
e
n
t
o
n
A
v
e
S
SE 128th St
SW Grady Way
116th Ave SEW
M
e
r
c
e
r
W
a
y
Puget Dr SEBenson
D
r
SLogan Ave NE Valley HwySW 41st St
S 3rd St
SW 7th St Union Ave NE87th Ave SLake Wa
sh
ing
ton
B
lvd
N
Renton Ave S
W Valley HwyHoquiam Ave NEMaplewoodNeighborhood Park
Fort DentCounty Park
SkywayPark
RentonPark
CoaleldPark
LakeridgePark
SierraPark
FAIRWOOD
KING COUNTYTUKWILA
KENT
NEWCASTLE
KING COUNTY
MERCER
ISLAND
BELLEVUE
LakeWashington
Lake Youngs
LakeDesire
Shady Lake
Green River
Cedar
R
i
v
e
r
PantherLake
LakeBoren
SpringbrookCreek Cedar R
iver
May Creek
§¨¦405
§¨¦405
§¨¦5
§¨¦5
ST851
ST716
RentonMunicipalAirport
Cedar River Natural Area
Ron RegisPark
MaplewoodGolf Course
Black RiverRiparian Forest
Cedar RiverNatural Area
SpringbrookWatershed
Panther CreekWetlands
Gene CoulonMemorial Beach Park
RentonWetlands
EdlundProperty
RentonWetlands
CascadePark
Cleveland /Richardson Property
Panther CreekWetlands
KiwanisPark
Cedar RiverTrail Park
HeritagePark
PhilipArnold Park
TianyPark
SpringbrookTrail
ThomasTeasdale Park
Highlands Park andNeighborhood Center
KennydaleLions Park
WindsorHills Park
Honey CreekGreenway
EarlingtonPark
North Highlands Park andNeighborhood Center
SpringbrookTrail
KennydaleBeach Park
May Creek Park
N.A.R.COProperty
Meadow CrestAccessible Playground
KenyonDobson Property
Cedar River Natural Area
Black RiverRiparian Forest
Cedar RiverNatural Area
SpringbrookWatershed
Panther CreekWetlands
RentonWetlands
RentonWetlands
Panther CreekWetlands
Honey CreekGreenway
May CreekGreenway
1
2
3
4 5 678910
11
12 13
14
15
16
17 18
19
Sunset Neighborhood Park Riverview Park
Maplewood Roadside Park
Glencoe Park
Senior Activity Center and
Community Garden
Jones Park
Liberty Park
Cedar River Park
Piazza & Gateway
Veterans Memorial Park
Sit In Park
Burnett Linear Park
Maplewood Park
Lake Street Open Space
Talbot Hill Reservoir Park
Parkwood South Park
SE 186th Place Properties
Tiany Park /
Cascade Park Connection
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
18
1
Tonkin Park
°
0 ½ 1¼
Mile
Other Park and Recreation Facilities
Parks Provided by Others
Schools
Developed Park Access
1/2 Mile Renton Owned/Maintained
Pedestrian Service Area
Base Map Features
Renton City Boundary
Potential Annexation Areas
Renton Park and Recreation Facilities
Regional Park
Community Park
Neighborhood Park
Open Space
Trail Corridor
Special Use
Future Park
Pedestrian Barrier (Highways)Sources: City of Renton and King County GIS, 2019.September 20191/2 Mile Other Agency Owned/
Maintained Pedestrian Service Area
Developed Park Access
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 57
COMMUNITY NEEDS
PARK LAND SYSTEM-WIDE
A park system acreage standard helps relate system-wide park
land need to the RCO’s quantity criteria. Table 4.2 summarizes the
standard for the total park and natural area system, as well as the
subset of developed parks (neighborhood, community, regional,
special use and corridors). New parks should address the major gaps
in park access and provide continuity in natural areas.
By applying these standards to the current population of Renton, the
analysis focuses attention on the need to develop park land that the
City already owns (see table 4.3, page 59). At the current population
level, meeting the standard requires 530.8 acres of developed park
land4. The City currently has 446.9 acres of developed parks, a gap of
83.9 acres. The current inventory of undeveloped park land intended
for neighborhood and community parks is almost the exact same
amount, 85.5 acres. Even if this land were developed immediately
it would not fill all of the gaps in access across Renton’s Community
Planning Areas. For natural areas, the City is slightly ahead of the
standard currently due to extensive acquisitions when funding was
available in the 1990s. In the near term, there is a need to develop
currently undeveloped parkland for neighborhood and community
parks and to increase access to existing natural areas. In the longer
term, additional land will need to be acquired to meet the level of
service standard.
Park Development and Renovations
To meet the LOS standard and to provide better access to parks,
Renton needs to proceed with developing future park sites. Six
4 Current land need is calculated by multiplying the population by the standard
and dividing the result by 1,000.
People living within
a 10 minute walking
distance of a park have
higher levels of physical
activity and lower rates
of obesity.
National Recreation
and Park Association,
Walking Infographic,
2016
TYPE STANDARD
Developed Parks 5.07 acres/1,000 population or 1 acre of park land per 200 people
Natural Areas Minimum of 6.14 acres/1,000 population
Total Park and Natural Areas System Minimum of 11.21 acres/1,000 population
Table 4.2: Park Acreage Standards
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
58 | CITY OF RENTON
CHAPTER FOUR
116th Ave NEE Mercer WayTalbot Rd SNewcastle
G
o
l
f
C
l
u
b
R
d
SW 27th St
SE 168th StPark Ave NSE Petrovitsky Rd
S 133rd St
124th Ave SE1
5
4
t
h
P
l
S
E
NE 4th St
SE May Va
l
l
e
y
R
d
R
e
n
t
o
n
A
v
e
S
156th Ave SESE 128th St164th Ave SESW Grady Way
116th Ave SEW
M
e
r
c
e
r
W
a
y
Puget Dr SEBenson
D
r
SE Valley HwySW 41st St
SW 7th St 87th Ave SRenton Ave S
W Valley HwyHoquiam Ave NEFAIRWOOD
KING COUNTYTUKWILA
KENT
NEWCASTLE
KING COUNTY
MERCER
ISLAND
BELLEVUE
LakeWashington
Lake Youngs
LakeDesire
Shady Lake
Green River
Cedar
R
i
v
e
r
PantherLake
LakeBoren
SpringbrookCreek
May Creek
§¨¦405
§¨¦405
§¨¦5
§¨¦5
ST851
ST716
RentonMunicipalAirport
Cedar River Natural Area
Ron RegisPark
MaplewoodGolf Course
Black RiverRiparian Forest
Cedar RiverNatural Area
SpringbrookWatershed
Panther CreekWetlands
Gene CoulonMemorial Beach Park
RentonWetlands
EdlundProperty
RentonWetlands
CascadePark
Cleveland /Richardson Property
Panther CreekWetlands
KiwanisPark
Cedar RiverTrail Park
HeritagePark
PhilipArnold Park
TianyPark
SpringbrookTrail
ThomasTeasdale Park
Highlands Park andNeighborhood Center
KennydaleLions Park
WindsorHills Park
Honey CreekGreenway
EarlingtonPark
North Highlands Park andNeighborhood Center
SpringbrookTrail
KennydaleBeach Park
May Creek Park
N.A.R.COProperty
Meadow CrestAccessible Playground
KenyonDobson Property
Cedar River Natural Area
Black RiverRiparian Forest
Cedar RiverNatural Area
SpringbrookWatershed
Panther CreekWetlands
RentonWetlands
RentonWetlands
Panther CreekWetlands
Honey CreekGreenway
May CreekGreenway
1
2
3
4 5 678910
11
12 13
14
15
16
17 18
19
°
0 ½ 1¼
Mile
Other Park and Recreation Facilities
Parks Provided by Others
Schools
Zones with Residential Uses
High Density Residential Zone
Base Map Features
Renton City Boundary
Potential Annexation Areas
Water
Renton Park and Recreation Facilities
Regional Park
Community Park
Neighborhood Park
Open Space
Trail Corridor
Special Use
Future Park
Developed Park Access
1/4 Mile Pedestrian Service Area
Commercial Zone with Residential Uses
Pedestrian Barrier (Highways)Sources: City of Renton and King County GIS, 2019.September 2019Sunset Neighborhood Park Riverview Park
Maplewood Roadside Park
Glencoe Park
Senior Activity Center and
Community Garden
Jones Park
Liberty Park
Cedar River Park
Piazza & Gateway
Veterans Memorial Park
Sit In Park
Burnett Linear Park
Maplewood Park
Lake Street Open Space
Talbot Hill Reservoir Park
Parkwood South Park
SE 186th Place Properties
Tiany Park /
Cascade Park Connection
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
18
1
Tonkin Park
Developed Park Access and Residential Density
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 59
COMMUNITY NEEDS
properties totaling over 80 acres remain undeveloped in the park
inventory. Developing public access and adding recreation features
on these sites would improve park access for many residents who do
not have it today.
Public input also revealed that several popular city parks receive
most of the use in Renton. This is especially true for parks with
water access such as Gene Coulon Memorial Park, as well as other
signature parks such as Liberty Park, Cedar River Trail Park and Cedar
River Park. There is a demand to enhance and renovate facilities and
increase the level of maintenance at these sites to handle current
park use and ensure a quality user experience. Improvements
proposed for these locations as outlined in the Project List will help
meet these demands and needs.
Sustaining the existing system requires periodic reinvestment as
individual features and ultimately entire parks reach the end of their
lifespan. Without this reinvestment, the cost of maintaining parks
will increase as routine tasks are overtaken by emergency ones. In
2018, the City explored the total need for major maintenance and
ultimately issued $14.5 million in bonds for the most urgent projects;
Renton’s park renovation and upgrade needs will require ongoing
prioritization and re-prioritization. Recent park construction has
focused on improving existing parks (replacing Sunset Court Park with
Sunset Neighborhood Park and replacing two outdated playgrounds
by adding Meadow Crest Accessible Playground in partnership with
the Renton School District). Updating and renovating aged facilities
that are unused or underutilized will help meet community needs.
TYPE EXISTING PARKLAND 2019 (ACRES)
PARKLAND NEEDED TO MEET LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARD FOR 2019 POPULATION (ACRES)
PARKLAND NEEDED TO MEET LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARD WITH 2035 POPULATION (ACRES)
Developed Parks 446.9 530.8 682.2Future Park Sites 85.5
Natural Areas 711.7 642.9 826.1
Total 1244.1 1173.7 1488.3
Table 4.3: Park Land Needs Based on Level of Service Standard*
* The standard above is based on the following assumptions: 2030 population of 124,106; 95 additional acres of
neighborhood and community parks; a minimum of 75 additional acres of natural areas.
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
60 | CITY OF RENTON
CHAPTER FOUR
116th Ave NEE Mercer WayTalbot Rd SNewcastle
G
o
l
f
C
l
u
b
R
d
SE 168th StPark Ave NSE Petrovitsky Rd
S 133rd St
1
5
4
t
h
P
l
S
E
NE 4th St
SE May Va
l
l
e
y
R
d
R
e
n
t
o
n
A
v
e
S
156th Ave SESE 128th St164th Ave SESW Grady Way
116th Ave SEW
M
e
r
c
e
r
W
a
y
Puget Dr SEBenson
D
r
SLogan Ave NE Valley HwySW 41st St
S 3rd St
SW 7th St Union Ave NE87th Ave SLake
Wa
sh
ing
ton
B
lvd
NW Valley HwyHoquiam Ave NEFAIRWOOD
KING COUNTYTUKWILA
KENT
NEWCASTLE
KING COUNTY
MERCER
ISLAND
BELLEVUE
LakeWashington
Lake Youngs
LakeDesire
Shady Lake
Green River
Cedar
R
i
v
e
r
PantherLake
LakeBoren
May Creek
SpringbrookCreek
§¨¦405
§¨¦405
§¨¦5
§¨¦5
ST851
ST716
RentonMunicipalAirport
Ron RegisPark
MaplewoodGolf Course
Cedar RiverNatural Area
SpringbrookWatershed
Panther CreekWetlands
Gene CoulonMemorial Beach Park
EdlundProperty
CascadePark
Cleveland /Richardson Property
Panther CreekWetlands
KiwanisPark
Cedar RiverTrail Park
HeritagePark
PhilipArnold Park
TianyPark
SpringbrookTrail
ThomasTeasdale Park
Highlands Park andNeighborhood Center
KennydaleLions Park
WindsorHills Park
Honey CreekGreenway
EarlingtonPark
North Highlands Park andNeighborhood Center
SpringbrookTrail
KennydaleBeach Park
May Creek Park
N.A.R.COProperty
Meadow CrestAccessible Playground
KenyonDobson Property
Black RiverRiparian Forest
Cedar RiverNatural Area
SpringbrookWatershed
Panther CreekWetlands
RentonWetlands Panther CreekWetlands
May CreekGreenway
Honey CreekGreenway
1
2
3
4 5 678910
11
12 13
14
15
16
17 18
19
Honey Dew
School
Renton
High School
Lindbergh
High School
Fred Nelsen
Middle School
Cascade
Elementary
School
Sierra Heights
Elementary School
Benson Hill
Elementary School
John Mcknight
Jr High School
Renton Technical
College
Renton Park
Elementary
Talbot Hill
Elementary
School
Tiany Park
Elementary School
Highlands
Elem School
Maple Heights
Elementary School
Early Childhood
Learning Center
Sartori
Elementary School
Hazen
High School
Kennydale
Elementary School
New Horizon
School
St. Anthony's
School
°
0 ½ 1¼
MileSources: City of Renton and King County GIS, 2019.October 2019Base Map Features
Renton City Boundary
Potential Annexation Areas
Other Park and Recreation Facilities
Parks Provided by Others
Schools
Renton Park and Recreation Facilities
Regional Park
Community Park
Neighborhood Park
Open Space
Trail Corridor
Special Use
Future Park
Indicates Loop Trail within Park
Trailhead Access
10 Minute Walk to Trailhead Area
Formal Trailhead (parking, trail sign/kiosk)
Informal Trailhead (parking)
Pedestrian Barrier (highways)
Trail Access Point (trail sign; no parking)
Trails
City of Renton Trails
Other Pedestrian Trails
Sunset Neighborhood Park Riverview Park
Maplewood Roadside Park
Glencoe Park
Senior Activity Center and
Community Garden
Jones Park
Liberty Park
Cedar River Park
Piazza & Gateway
Veterans Memorial Park
Sit In Park
Burnett Linear Park
Maplewood Park
Lake Street Open Space
Talbot Hill Reservoir Park
Parkwood South Park
SE 186th Place Properties
Tiany Park /
Cascade Park Connection
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
18
1
Tonkin Park
**
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Trailhead Access
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 61
COMMUNITY NEEDS
RECREATION FACILITY NEEDS
The planning process identified needs for a variety of park and
recreation facilities. The recreation facilities assessment incorporated
the use of four tools to determine recreation facility needs. This
included a review of statewide recreation trends, a sports field
level of service (LOS) analysis, a geographic analysis and a review of
community demand for facilities including but not limited to trails,
sports fields, playgrounds, community gathering spaces, indoor
programmable spaces, water access facilities, skate parks, dog parks
and other facilities.
Access to Trails
Trails are a priority for the Renton community and are among the
most frequently used recreation facilities. Community members have
indicated that opportunities for exercise and access to natural areas
are important functions of the parks, recreation and natural areas
system. Community members want to see trail extensions, improved
connections and wayfinding throughout the system. There is also
an interest in park amenities such as lighting, seating and drinking
fountains.
Trails support both exercise and access. An analysis of trail access in
Renton identified areas that are within a ½-mile walk to a trailhead
and areas outside of a ½-mile walk (see Trailhead Access Map on
page 60). The analysis includes three types of trail access points
(listed in Table 4.4 above). Opportunities for improvements and/or
connections will likely differ based on the type of access available.
Where access points or informal trailheads exist, add features to
make them formal trail heads if practicable.
ACCESS TYPE DESCRIPTION
Formal Trailhead Includes parking (off-street or on-street) and a trail sign or kiosk. May include a
restroom or be located in a park.
Informal Trailhead Includes parking, may be on-street or off-street. May be in a park.
Trail Access point Formal access point to a trail that includes trail sign but does not offer parking.
Table 4.4 Types of Trail Access Points
More than half (58%)
of residents use
multi-use paved trails
regularly (at least five
times a year), and more
than half (56%) of all
residents say they walk
or hike a Renton trail at
least five times a year.
– Community Priority
Survey 2019
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
62 | CITY OF RENTON
CHAPTER FOUR
116th Ave NEE Mercer WayTalbot Rd SNewcastle
G
o
l
f
C
l
u
b
R
d
SW 27th St Park Ave NSE Petrovitsky Rd
S 133rd St
124th Ave SE1
5
4
t
h
P
l
S
E
NE 4th St
SE May Va
l
l
e
y
R
d
R
e
n
t
o
n
A
v
e
S
156th Ave SESE 128th St164th Ave SESW Grady Way
W
M
e
r
c
e
r
W
a
y
Puget Dr SELogan Ave NE Valley HwySW 41st St
SW 7th St 87th Ave SLake
Wa
sh
ing
ton
B
lvd
N
Renton Ave S
W Valley HwyFAIRWOOD
KING COUNTYTUKWILA
KENT
NEWCASTLE
KING COUNTY
MERCER
ISLAND
BELLEVUE
LakeWashington
Lake Youngs
LakeDesire
Shady Lake
Green River
Cedar
R
i
v
e
r
PantherLake
LakeBoren
May Creek
SpringbrookCreek Cedar R
iver
§¨¦405
§¨¦405
§¨¦5
§¨¦5
ST851
ST716
RentonMunicipalAirport
Cedar River Natural Area
Ron RegisPark
MaplewoodGolf Course
Black RiverRiparian Forest
Cedar RiverNatural Area
SpringbrookWatershed
Panther CreekWetlands
Gene CoulonMemorial Beach Park
RentonWetlands
EdlundProperty
RentonWetlands
CascadePark
Cleveland /Richardson Property
Panther CreekWetlands
KiwanisPark
Cedar RiverTrail Park
HeritagePark
PhilipArnold Park
TianyPark
SpringbrookTrail
ThomasTeasdale Park
Highlands Park andNeighborhood Center
KennydaleLions Park
WindsorHills Park
Honey CreekGreenway
EarlingtonPark
North Highlands Park andNeighborhood Center
SpringbrookTrail
KennydaleBeach Park
May Creek Park
N.A.R.COProperty
Meadow CrestAccessible Playground
KenyonDobson Property
Cedar River Natural Area
Black RiverRiparian Forest
Cedar RiverNatural Area
SpringbrookWatershed
Panther CreekWetlands
RentonWetlands
RentonWetlands
Panther CreekWetlands
Honey CreekGreenway
May CreekGreenway
1
2
3
4 5 678910
11
12 13
14
15
16
17 18
19
°
0 ½ 1¼
Mile
Other Park and Recreation Facilities
Parks Provided by Others
Schools
Sportseld Access
1/2 Mile Renton Owned/Maintained
Sports Field Pedestrian Service Area
1/2 Mile School Owned/Maintained
Sports Field Pedestrian Service Area
Pedestrian Barrier (Highways)
Base Map Features
Renton City Boundary
Potential Annexation Areas
Renton Park and Recreation Facilities
Regional Park
Community Park
Neighborhood Park
Open Space
Trail Corridor
Special Use
Future ParkSources: City of Renton and King County GIS, 2019.September 2019Sunset Neighborhood Park Riverview Park
Maplewood Roadside Park
Glencoe Park
Senior Activity Center and
Community Garden
Jones Park
Liberty Park
Cedar River Park
Piazza & Gateway
Veterans Memorial Park
Sit In Park
Burnett Linear Park
Maplewood Park
Lake Street Open Space
Talbot Hill Reservoir Park
Parkwood South Park
SE 186th Place Properties
Tiany Park /
Cascade Park Connection
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
18
1
Tonkin Park
Sports Field Access
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 63
COMMUNITY NEEDS
Sports Fields
The analysis of sports fields includes a review of the number of
fields by population and their geographic distribution. This analysis
examines closely the potential of School District owned facilities to
provide additional service. When including both City-and school-
owned fields, the service area analysis shows that many areas of
Renton are close to an existing sports field, with the exception of
portions of the East Plateau, Benson and Talbot planning areas and
the potential annexation areas within Fairwood, East Plateau, Valley
and West Hill.
Public feedback indicated that there is a demand for youth, adult and
adaptive facilities, which are defined in Chapter 2. Currently, the City
of Renton provides one diamond shaped (baseball/softball) field per
26,175 residents and one rectangular shaped (soccer/football/rugby
etc.) field per 104,700 residents. If School District fields are added
to the existing City-owned fields, the ratio of fields to population
is increased to one diamond field per 6,159 residents and one
rectangular field per 26,175 residents. The adopted level of service
standard for sports fields is 1/6,663 for diamond fields and 1/10,779
for rectangular fields. As the community has grown, no new fields
have been added; to meet this standard Renton would need six new
soccer fields.
45%40%15%Build a new all-weather mul�-use field complex
Invest more/ Should invest Same amount/ No opinion/ (NR)Invest less/ Should not invest
38%48%14%Enhance exis�ng sports fields
23%69%8%(New) Sports field
Figure 4.1: Investment Priorities for Sports Fields, Community Priority Survey 2019
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
64 | CITY OF RENTON
CHAPTER FOUR
There are limitations to the use of School District facilities. District
athletic programs and school events take priority for use of these
facilities even after school hours and on weekends. Outside these
scheduled uses and regularly scheduled school hours, the public
can access the school fields for reserved or casual play, with a few
exceptions noted in Appendix A. However, many of the school fields
are maintained for non-competitive use and do not meet recreation
programming needs.
Field capacity is based on more than the number of existing fields.
The actual amount of available field time and the level of play
possible (determined by the field type, maintenance level and lights)
are constraining factors. Condition of fields and components (such
as dugouts and equipment storage) is also an important factor.
While new fields are needed, the improvement of existing fields
through the installation of artificial turf (or other improved playing
surfaces) and lights will increase the available playable time. The
condition ratings provided in Appendix A-3 can help guide where
improvements can be focused, where adding or improving key
components can increase the usability of existing fields. Policy
changes to ensure the efficient and intensive scheduling and use
of fields will also be important. Another emerging strategy for
increasing the available time is to use modified (smaller) fields,
particularly for younger youth and older adult play.
The configuration of fields also limits their use for programming.
With most of Renton’s fields distributed one per park citywide,
efficiency in maintenance or tournament play is more challenging.
As fields are added the City should look for opportunities to locate
multiple fields in one park site and add a special sports field complex.
Even with new fields, it is unlikely the City can meet the standard
alone. Partnerships and updated agreements with the School District
will be important to reaching the standard level of service for fields.
Playgrounds
According to recreation participation and public involvement
findings, playground use is a popular activity with one of the highest
participation rates. The City provides playground equipment at
approximately 75% of its neighborhood parks and just less than half
of its community parks. Access to playgrounds is an important part of
having parks within a 10 minute walk of every home.
Young people describe
being physically active
as “joyful” and “stress
relieving.”
Free play, especially
outdoors, is important
for kids. It is essential to
healthy development,
contributing to
cognitive, physical,
social and emotional
well-being. It is an ideal
way for parents to
engage with children
and serves as a primary
opportunity for physical
activity.
Source: State of Play:
Seattle-King County,
2019
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 65
COMMUNITY NEEDS
Renton’s playgrounds have, in the past, been a similar set of
play amenities in all parks. The City is responding to demand for
specialized play opportunities, such as inclusive playgrounds, nature
play or other thematic or creative play opportunities. The Meadow
Crest Accessible Playground, a joint project between the City of
Renton and the Renton School District, is an example of this kind of
diversity in play spaces. Recent playground replacements have also
moved toward more diverse play settings.
The Benson and East Plateau Community Planning Areas have
substantial gaps in playground service, matching the need for
developed park access. While residents in these areas have access
to several School District playgrounds after regular school hours,
additional playgrounds are recommended.
Based on the location of existing playgrounds, the Community
Planning Areas of Talbot and Valley are also short on nearby access
to City and/or school playgrounds. Additional playgrounds should be
considered for Talbot while the Valley area is primarily commercial/
industrial and therefore has a limited need for children’s playgrounds.
INDOOR PROGRAMMABLE SPACES
Indoor programmable spaces include public facilities available to
serve small or large events and programs. Larger facilities typically
include multiple specialized spaces (such as banquet rooms,
gymnasiums or fitness studios) while smaller facilities may have one
gym, general classroom space or special purpose spaces.
Renton currently has one large indoor programmable space (the
Renton Community Center) and 8 smaller scale facilities5, which
range from neighborhood park buildings to the Senior Activity Center.
An evaluation of the quantity of facilities by population results in a
ratio of one facility per 11,633 residents or 8.6 square feet/person.
The quantity of buildings is just one factor in evaluating the need
for indoor space. Other factors include quality and distribution.
Quality is related to the ability of a building to facilitate recreation.
Smaller buildings provide a more limited range of recreation options.
Indoor space is expensive to build and maintain. Existing buildings
5 Does not include Renton History Museum, Carco Theater, Maplewood Golf
Course or Liberty Park building which are all City-owned and independently
operated.
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
66 | CITY OF RENTON
CHAPTER FOUR
require periodic reinvestment to ensure that they are optimized,
operationally effective and efficient to maintain.
Updates to the facilities and programming at the Renton Community
Center, Senior Activity Center, and the Highlands Neighborhood
Center have increased community use and interest in these spaces.
Due to the Great Recession, public interest shifting away from
drop-in programming and the physical limitations of the smallest
neighborhood park buildings, Renton has closed the buildings in
several neighborhood parks. The City should focus improvements
on the locations that have the most potential and interest in
programming through partnerships. One example of a success is
the updates to the Highlands Neighborhood Center for the STREAM
(science, technology, recreation, environment, art, and math) Team
program, a partnership of Renton recreation with Techbridge Girls,
the Environmental Science Center, and Centro Rendu of St. Vincent
de Paul funded by a King County Best Starts for Kids Grant.
Larger facilities with a more complete range of programming
opportunities, provide more recreation value and greater flexibility
and have lower operating costs. Larger facilities draw people from a
further distance. For these reasons, a geographic analysis of indoor
programmable spaces focused on a travel distance of two miles6. The
analysis indicated that the City needs to add two large scale facilities
to serve the community, one in the Highlands/East Plateau and a
second in either Talbot or Benson. As of 2019, the City, in partnership
with the Family First Community Center Foundation, the Renton
School District and HealthPoint is planning and fundraising for The
Family First Center, a large-scale facility in the Benson Community
Planning Area. The City’s facilities could also be further augmented
by school buildings if additional public access is secured through
partnership with the Renton School District.
Specialized Facilities
Specialized facilities serve the entire city or at a minimum, a
substantial portion of the city. Due to the nature of these facilities,
the geographic distribution of specialized facilities is not necessarily
as important as their quality and existing capacity. Residents feel that
6 This analysis was not repeated in 2019 because the location of facilities had
not changed.
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 67
COMMUNITY NEEDS
Renton’s recreation facilities are important assets. As such, adequate
repair and maintenance is needed to sustain these resources and
extend their lifespan. The community has expressed demand for
the following specialized facilities. It will be important to consider
opportunities to add these facilities as parks are developed or
renovated.
• Swimming Pools/Aquatic Facilities: The City of Renton owns
and operates the Henry Moses Aquatic Center which offers
outdoor swimming and water play, including lessons and
fitness classes. On warm days, the demand can far exceed the
capacity. The Renton School District currently owns, manages
and maintains two existing indoor pools. The community
expressed that there is insufficient time available for open
swim and swim lessons at these facilities.
• Skate Parks: While there is continued use of Renton’s existing
skate park, public demand has leveled off (along with
national trends in skateboarding participation). The existing
Liberty Park facility is important and could be supplemented
by small skate spots in other areas of the community to
improve access.
• Water Access Facilities: Access to Lake Washington for
swimming, motorized and non-motorized boating (including
sailing, canoeing, and kayaking) is provided at Gene Coulon
Memorial Beach Park. Additional water access facilities are
included at Kennydale Beach Park (swimming), Cedar River
Trail Park (non-motorized boat launch) and the Cedar River
Boathouse (rowing, canoe and kayak rentals, lessons and
access) as well as Riverview Park on the Cedar River (non-
motorized boat access). Demand for water access facilities is
very high, and additional facilities to support rowing, sailing
and other small craft are desired. Improvements at some of
these locations will also enhance public access.
• Dog Parks: There is demand for at least one large and/or
several smaller permanent off-leash areas, based on public
involvement findings. New facilities should be geographically
dispersed and could be provided in areas with high or
increasing residential density (where yard space for dogs is
limited).
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
68 | CITY OF RENTON
CHAPTER FOUR
• Outdoor Courts: Renton has 17 tennis courts and 13
basketball courts located mostly in neighborhood and
community parks. Additional courts are located at Renton
School District sites, although not all are available to the
public. Additional outdoor courts for basketball, tennis,
pickleball and volleyball should be considered in new park
design and construction, filling gaps in service throughout the
park system.
• Community Gardens: The City provides two community
gardens and has supported expansion of community
gardening in partnerships and through the Neighborhood
Grant Program.
• Interpretive Facilities: The City has a limited number of
interpretive facilities which currently include signage and
educational kiosks within the park system. The public
expressed an interest in providing more of these education-
based amenities telling the story of Renton’s natural
environment, culture and history throughout the park
system. Interpretive facilities should focus on unique or
readily accessible natural areas such as the Cedar River and
the Black River Riparian Forest.
RECREATION PROGRAMMING NEEDS
The Recreation Division has been engaged in a parallel strategic
planning effort that has identified gaps in the program offerings
and populations within the Renton community that can benefit
from enhanced programming. The gaps in programming present
opportunities for the City to improve and modify program offerings
or identify partners to take the lead.
Within recreation programming the rapid pace of change in trends
and community demand requires timely updating of internal
planning documents that guide the Division. These gaps and focus
populations should be considered a snapshot in time that will
continue to be updated in the Recreation and Neighborhoods
Strategic and Operations Plan effort and ongoing program planning.
A survey of STREAM
Team youth
participants indicated:
69% have learned what
they do affects the
natural environment
66% are learning
ways to protect the
environment
Source: STREAM Team
Outcomes Report,
Renton Recreation
and Neighborhoods
Division, 2019
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 69
COMMUNITY NEEDS
Program Area Gaps
Some of the identified gaps have park facility implications, while
others represent new or enhanced efforts that are needed to close
the gaps.
• Year-round playable sports fields,
• Adaptive sports fields,
• Adaptive recreational programming for youth and those with
emotional and sensory needs,
• Green space for open play, differentiated from scheduled and
programmed space,
• Year-round swimming access (safety, swim lessons),
• Environmental education,
• Recreational programming for tween and teen girls, and
• Programming around new technology and cultural arts could
be provided in partnership with the School District, private
and community organizations
Focus Populations
Within each of the general categories of population that Recreation is
aiming to better serve, there are specific sub-groups and topics that
require additional attention.
• Preschool – up to 5: early childhood education, which can
take many forms,
• Youth: programming that serves the unique needs of girls in
this age range,
• Teens: programming that serves the unique needs of girls in
this age range,
• Adults: social gatherings and activities,
• Seniors: addressing younger and working seniors; supporting
seniors raising grandchildren,
• Adaptive: specifically, for those with spectrum, sensory and
emotional needs,
Washingtonians
participate in outdoor
recreation more than
445 million days each
year, or on average, we
spend 56 days a year
recreating outdoors. Of
all the places there are
to go, local parks are
the most visited.
Source: Economic
Benefits of Outdoor
Recreation in
Washington Factsheet,
Washington Recreation
and Conservation
Office, 2015
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
70 | CITY OF RENTON
CHAPTER FOUR
Talbot Rd SNewcastle
G
o
l
f
C
l
u
b
R
d
SW 27th St
SE 168th StPark Ave NSE Petrovitsky Rd
S 133rd St Edmonds Ave NENE 4th St
SE May Va
l
l
e
y
R
d
156th Ave SESE 128th St164th Ave SESW Grady Way
116th Ave SEW
M
e
r
c
e
r
W
a
y
Puget Dr SEBenson
D
r
SLogan Ave NE Valley HwySW 41st St
S 3rd St
SW 7th St Union Ave NE87th Ave SLake
Wa
sh
ing
ton
B
lvd
N
Renton Ave S
W Valley HwyHoquiam Ave NEFAIRWOOD
KING COUNTY
TUKWILA
KENT
NEWCASTLE
KING COUNTY
MERCER
ISLAND
BELLEVUE
LakeWashington
Lake Youngs
LakeDesire
Shady Lake
Green River
Cedar
R
i
v
e
r
PantherLake
LakeBoren
May Creek
SpringbrookCreek Cedar R
iver
§¨¦405
§¨¦405
§¨¦5
§¨¦5
ST851
ST716
RentonMunicipalAirport
1
2
3
4 5 678910
11
12 13
14
15
16
17 18
19
Cougar Mountain
Regional Wildland Park
Soos Creek Park
and Trail
Soos Creek Park
and Trail
Fort Dent
County Park
May Valley
County Park
Renton
Park
May Creek
Greenway
McGarvey Park
Open Space
Metro
Waterwork Park
Cavanaugh Pond
Natural Area
Clarke
Beach Park
Lakeridge
Park
Bryn Mawr
Boulevard
Lane Park
Black RiverRiparian Forest
Cedar RiverNatural Area
SpringbrookWatershed
Panther CreekWetlands
RentonWetlands
Panther CreekWetlands
May CreekGreenway
Honey CreekGreenway
RentonWetlands
°
0 ½ 1¼
Mile
Other Park and Recreation Facilities
Parks Provided by Others
Schools
Natural Area Access
1/2 Mile Renton Owned/Maintained
Pedestrian Service Area
1/2 Mile Other Agency Owned/
Maintained Pedestrian Service Area
Pedestrian Barrier (Highways)
Base Map Features
Renton City Boundary
Potential Annexation Areas
Renton Park and Recreation Facilities
Regional Park
Community Park
Neighborhood Park
Open Space
Trail Corridor
Special Use
Future ParkSources: City of Renton and King County GIS, 2019.September 2019Sunset Neighborhood Park Riverview Park
Maplewood Roadside Park
Glencoe Park
Senior Activity Center and
Community Garden
Jones Park
Liberty Park
Cedar River Park
Piazza & Gateway
Veterans Memorial Park
Sit In Park
Burnett Linear Park
Maplewood Park
Lake Street Open Space
Talbot Hill Reservoir Park
Parkwood South Park
SE 186th Place Properties
Tiany Park /
Cascade Park Connection
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
18
1
Tonkin Park
Natural Area Access
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 71
COMMUNITY NEEDS
• Multi-cultural: reflect the demographics of the city through
arts and culture, and
• Families: family events, resources for family conversations.
NATURAL AREA AND
RESOURCE NEEDS
The evaluation of the City’s natural areas and resources included an
evaluation of public access to these lands, as well as an assessment
of overall value and condition (level of maintenance). This built on
several prior studies including the Urban Tree Canopy Assessment
and individual site visits.
Access to Natural Areas
Because of the importance and desire of having nearby access to
natural areas in Renton, the natural areas assessment used a half-
mile travel distance, equivalent to a 10 minute walk (see Natural Area
Access Map). Renton’s natural areas are located along wetlands and
the rivers and creeks that flow through the city. Recent additions
to natural areas in Renton have expanded existing natural areas to
support needed habitat continuity. However, all Community Planning
Areas within the city have areas that are unserved by natural areas
within a half-mile distance. Natural areas cannot be dispersed
throughout the city in the same way neighborhood parks can.
Therefore, corridors and trail connections are essential for improving
access to natural areas.
Existing trails in natural areas are generally short, discontinuous and
designed for foot traffic only. In areas with sensitive ecosystems,
these limits on trails are necessary to protect sensitive natural
areas. However, there are also several challenges associated
with a disconnected trail system. A shortage of trails makes site
management more challenging. In the absence of formal trails,
users are more likely to create their own trails for cut-through travel
or recreation purposes. Based on these conditions, there is a need
for improved system-wide management of Renton’s natural areas,
basing decisions on future site improvements and restoration efforts
on well informed data and planning.
Outdoor recreation
not only creates jobs
and builds businesses,
it cuts health care
costs, brings families
closer together, helps
kids learn in school,
and protects the
environment.
Source: Economic
Benefits of Outdoor
Recreation in
Washington Factsheet,
Washington Recreation
and Conservation
Office, 2015
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
72 | CITY OF RENTON
CHAPTER FOUR
Management of Natural Areas
Management of Renton’s natural areas is an important need.
Findings from the public involvement process indicate that residents
feel strongly about balancing public access to natural resource areas
with the need to protect and conserve these important assets. The
City’s salmon habitat, tree canopy and natural areas are all important
components of the community’s identity. There is a need to manage,
maintain and restore natural areas to support environmental and
community health.
The future management and maintenance of natural areas within
the city will require coordination to ensure efficient and strategic
use of resources. Many urban natural areas in the Pacific Northwest
face similar management challenges, in that they contain degraded
ecosystems that are relatively small and fragmented. Invasive species
often overcome native ones, and these areas can be subject to
dumping, encroachments, vandalism and homeless camping. Many,
if not most, urban natural areas have been left undeveloped because
they are very steep, unstable, wet or subject to flooding. Access
to these areas, for recreation or for maintenance, is often difficult.
Renton’s natural areas are faced with multiple ongoing challenges.
Heightened management and maintenance of natural resources is
needed with special attention toward addressing invasive species.
Appendix B provides a Natural Areas Evaluation Tool that the
City can use to systematically prioritize and manage its natural
areas. This tool utilizes a systematic continuum approach to
prioritizing and managing these areas. The approach begins with
Natural Areas
37% of responses
268 votes
Neighborhood Parks
25% of responses
181 votes
Special Use Parks
19% of responses
139 votes
Community Parks
18% of responses
127 votes
Figure 4.2: Open House #2 Online and In-Person, 2019 Community Priority Investment by Park Type
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 73
COMMUNITY NEEDS
inventorying natural areas and moves into stabilization, at which
point the natural area is no longer deteriorating, and then
improvement, and gradually, restoration and maintenance. The tool
provides guidance about the types of maintenance and restoration
that are needed at each phase of the continuum. It also includes
prioritization criteria that will help the City score sites and decide
which natural areas to focus on first for the development of
management plans.
STAFFING NEEDS
The Community Services Department is the primary manager of the
park, recreation and natural area system in Renton and is responsible
for parks, trails, building structures, recreational programs, events
and volunteer activities.
In recent years, the Department’s organization has evolved. While
the Department is still organized into eight divisions (Administration,
Facilities, Golf Course, Human Services, Museum, Parks & Trails, Parks
Planning & Natural Resources, and Recreations & Neighborhoods),
there have been shifts in responsibilities within the Department
and within the larger City of Renton organization. The Golf Course
Division operates the Maplewood Golf Course as a stand-alone
enterprise. Five other Community Services divisions are responsible
for services related to parks, recreation and natural areas in Renton.
The staffing analysis focused on these five divisions, named and
described in Table 4.5.
Table 4.5: Community Services Department: Divisions and Responsibilities
DIVISION 2019 RESPONSIBILITIES
Administration Provides management and direction for the entire department.
Facilities Develops and maintains City buildings and manages the delivery of building-related
services to the public and the City workforce in a safe, customer-focused manner.
Parks & Trails Maintains parks, park lands, natural areas and outdoor recreation facilities. Includes the
Department’s Volunteer Coordinator and Farmer’s Market Coordinator.
Parks Planning &
Natural Resources
Responsible for systemwide parks and natural area planning, capital improvement
planning, property acquisition, and capital development. Includes the Urban Forestry &
Natural Resources Manager.
Recreation &
Neighborhoods
Provides opportunities for the public to participate in diverse recreational, cultural, athletic
and aquatic programs and activities. Responsible for neighborhood services (community
engagement and events).
Note: The Renton History Museum is not included for the purposes of this analysis.
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
74 | CITY OF RENTON
CHAPTER FOUR
By the nature of its work, the Community Services Department
has a mix of full-time and part-time staff. Full-time staff work 2080
hours per year. Staffing levels are expressed in terms of Full Time
Equivalents (FTEs) for ease of comparison. A part-time staff person
who works 520 hours in a year is considered 0.25 FTE.
Examining the staffing levels over time shows that while Renton’s
population has grown by 165%, staffing has remained relatively the
same the last 28 years. Historically, between 1990 and 2005, staff
increased along with population. However, staff reductions occurred
during the Great Recession. This reduction in staffing coincided with
a significant growth in population through annexations.
In addition, the Community Services Department also inherited new
programs and associated workload from Community and Economic
Development, including the Farmer’s Market, the Neighborhood
program and special events permitting.
Staffing Service Levels
Parks and recreation providers have a long history of evaluating
their park systems and services based on population metrics, often
expressed in terms such as cost per capita (resident population) or
units per 1,000 or 10,000 residents (e.g., 3 acres per 1,000 residents).
Staffing can be evaluated similarly, such as number of staff per
1,000 population or square footage/acres maintained per Full Time
Equivalent (FTE) employee. These calculations allow agencies to
measure service levels over time and to compare themselves to
others more easily.
The State of Staffing in Summary
In addition, a more in-depth Staffing analysis was evaluated by
division over time, examining the following trends:
• Acres maintained per employee,
• Recreation staff per 1,000 residents,
• Square footage of buildings maintained per employee, and
• Number of contract landscape maintenance sites per
employee.
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 75
COMMUNITY NEEDS
The analysis revealed only a slight increase in staffing levels from
1990 to 2018 overall for parks, recreation and natural areas, despite:
• More park and natural area acres to maintain,
• More building square footage to maintain,
• More people to serve,
• More events, and
• A larger Renton due to expanded city limits.
Staffing levels have not kept pace with increasing workload. Renton
has used approaches such as contracting and increasing the use
of part-time and seasonal employees. However, the number of
managers to oversee contracts and staff has not been increased and
strategic approaches to managing and maintaining the system into
the future are essential to facilitating a sustainable system.
SUMMARY OF NEEDS
The analysis of demand and needs presented in this chapter is
broad in scope and begins to describe the gap between today
and the park, recreation and natural areas system envisioned
by the community. These needs will not be met all at once, and
in fact some may not be able to be realized over the life of this
Plan. The following chapters describe what the City should do
to address these needs and how to prioritize projects.
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
76 | CITY OF RENTON
CHAPTER FOUR
This page intentionally left blank
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
5
RECOMMENDATIONS
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
78 | CITY OF RENTON
Meeting community needs for parks, recreation facilities, programming and
natural areas will require a strategic approach to park system investment.
This chapter presents both system-wide recommendations for the entire
City, as well as specific projects and park improvements for each Community
Planning Area.
RECOMMENDATIONS
SYSTEM-WIDE RECOMMENDATIONS
The system-wide recommendations respond directly to the goals presented in Chapter 1. At the system-
wide scale, there are eight overarching recommendations.
Provide Nearby Parks, Recreation Facilities,
Programming And Natural Areas
As shown in the access analysis maps, many areas are not served by existing parks, recreation facilities and
natural areas. Some neighborhoods are not currently served by parks, while barriers such as busy streets
limit safe access to other park sites. System-wide recommendations for addressing parks need to include
the following:
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 79
• Implement a ½-mile (10 minute walk) service area to developed parks: The City should continue
to provide developed parks and natural areas within a ½-mile service (10 minute walk) distance.
Removing or mitigating barriers to existing parks and acquiring and/or developing new parks in
underserved neighborhoods will increase access to parks and natural areas.
• Implement a ¼-mile (5 minute walk) service area to developed parks in higher density areas: In
areas zoned high density residential, the service distance to developed parks and natural areas
should be decreased and new facilities should be added to serve the population within one-quarter
mile. Currently, most high density residential areas are underserved by local parks within a ¼-mile
service area.
• Maintain a developed park land level of service of 5.07 acres per 1,000 residents: To meet existing
and future needs, the City should continue to provide adequate developed parks to residents
(particularly neighborhood and community parks). Developing park land already purchased by the
City would keep the community at the level of service goal. Additional acreage purchases should
also address quality, access and distribution criteria.
• Develop new parks and improve existing parks according to the design guidelines: In order to
fully address park needs, all parks should meet the design guidelines, including the minimum size
guideline and recommended features at each park.
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
80 | CITY OF RENTON
CHAPTER FIVE
Reinvest In Renton’s Community Assets
Many of Renton’s parks were initially designed and developed
between the 1960s and the 1980s. The benefits of mature parks
include beautiful fully grown trees. Due to the age of the parks, many
are in need of re-evaluation and updating.
• Major maintenance: In order to extend the life of the major
features of Renton’s parks and recreation facilities larger
maintenance projects (beyond the repair, clean-up and
wear and tear) are needed. To complement the Facilities
Assessment the City should develop a Renovation and
Refurbishment Plan, by park and asset category, and report
their status (including completed projects, new projects,
critical needs and the consequences of inaction) annually.
Major maintenance projects should be completed as
resources are available starting with any critical needs.
• Systematically reinvest in features that are beyond their
useful life: Recognizing that each building and park feature
has a limited lifespan, the City should track the anticipated
replacement year for major building and park features in all
parks through the Facilities Assessment and a Renovation
and Refurbishment Plan as noted above. Expanding on the
Facilities Division’s inventory of building systems that will
need replacement by year, the City should track playgrounds,
sports fields (particularly as artificial turf becomes a feature
in the system), irrigation, picnic areas and hard surfaces such
as parking, trails and courts.
• Increase resources for maintaining parks, recreation
facilities and natural areas: Renton has a need for more
resources to sustain its parks, recreation and natural areas
system with population growth leading to increased wear and
tear.
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 81
RECOMMENDATIONS
Expand and Support Renton’s Professional
Parks, Recreation and Facilities Staff
The City’s recovery from the Great Recession has left the parks,
recreation, facilities and natural areas professional staff with an
increased workload, limiting their effectiveness. Reconsideration
of roles and additional staff capacity will create the opportunity to
implement other recommendations in this Plan.
• Expand capacity through administrative staff: Community
Services is lean in its administrative staff and staffing
resources should be evaluated to expand capacity, including
for grant administration.
• Provide adequate supervisory staff for seasonal employees:
Renton has relied heavily on seasonal employees. Seasonal
employees have a greater draw on supervisory staff due to
their youth, their shorter-term tenure and the consequent
need for retraining a new set of employees each season.
Many seasonal employees are frontline, meaning that they
interface with customers. They require customer service
training as well as on-going job specific training in order
to understand and execute the job requirements. Another
strategy to consider is shifting from a model of more seasonal
staff to increased year-round staff to more effectively meet
community needs.
• Re-evaluate landscape maintenance contracts: Consider
adding a contract specialist position in the Parks & Trails
division. As contracts expire, reevaluate the contract
terms with the dual goals of streamlining management
and encouraging a strong pool of bidders. Explore adding
landscape maintenance inspection to the job duties of one or
more maintenance workers.
• Free up the Urban Forestry and Natural Resources Manager
from landscape contract management: This would allow
more attention to urban forestry program development and
natural resource management activities, areas where there
is significant community interest. Consider combining natural
areas management and environmental education programs
under the Urban Forestry and Natural Resources Manager.
87% of respondents
to the 2017
NRPA Americans’
Engagement with Parks
Survey agree that
their local government
and local park and
recreation agency
should make the
needed investments
to ensure their
communities are more
resilient to natural
disasters.
Source: Economic
Impact of Local Parks,
National Recreation
and Park Association,
2018
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
82 | CITY OF RENTON
CHAPTER FIVE
• Continue to pursue more formal non-profit partner
approaches: Renton has partnered with community
organizations to provide programming with mixed results. More
structured criteria for selecting operators and more detailed
lease requirements (if applicable) can lead to longer-term
success.
Increase Park and Recreation Capacity and Use
A few parks receive the majority of use in Renton, such as Gene Coulon
Memorial Beach Park and Liberty Park, which provide water access
and sports fields respectively. Specific recommendations to increase
the potential capacity and use of frequently-used parks include the
following:
• Redevelop parks for a larger population: Re-master plan
parks to maximize their use. Expand or rebuild recreational
facilities and supporting infrastructure at popular existing
sites to accommodate a greater number of users. This may be
accomplished by expanding or renovating facilities (such as the
Henry Moses Aquatic Center and Renton Community Center)
to larger, more flexible facilities that can fulfill unmet need and
demand.
• Reimagine how parks and other public spaces work together:
Some parks are clustered (such as Liberty Park, Cedar River
Park and N.A.R.CO property) and others have close associations
with other public facilities such as schools or libraries. These
sites create opportunities to increase the benefits of each
facility through partnered improvements or programming
connections. Policy changes and pilot programming can explore
and encourage these connections.
• Increase awareness of Renton’s parks, recreation programs
and natural areas: Communicate the range of recreation
opportunities in Renton. Provide a high quality online presence
including the city website and social media to help users easily
find and access parks and recreation amenities and offerings,
supplementing printed guides (such as Let’s Go Renton)
and maps. Use high traffic park sites such as Gene Coulon
Memorial Beach Park and the Cedar River Trail to inform
users about other park sites and recreation programs. Create
Parks and trails
development can
also benefit local
environments and
support community
wellness. Sensitive
areas such as flood
plains may be
protected, ecosystem
services preserved, and
areas prone to natural
disasters shielded from
development that
would put people at
heightened risk.
Source: Centers for
Disease Control
and Prevention and
National Park Service.
Parks, Trails, and
Health Workbook.
Washington, DC:
National Park Service;
2015.
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 83
RECOMMENDATIONS
a comprehensive signage and wayfinding system in all new
and existing parks and natural areas. Signs should be both
informative (e.g., directional signage) and interpretive (e.g.,
describing history, culture and the environment), with a
consistent design style.
• Incorporate unique features that contribute to community
identity: Recognize elements of Renton that are important
to residents such as indigenous people, water access and
salmon. Elements that proudly represent Renton’s character
and community values can be carried forward into the
park system through interpretive displays, public art and
integration into play structures and environments.
Improve Management of Natural Areas
Enhanced management is needed in natural areas, balancing
public use with protection and conservation. Through individual
management plans, the City can determine long- and short- term
goals and priorities for natural areas. System-wide recommendations
include the following:
• Conduct natural area inventories: The City should conduct
natural area inventories to inform management decisions for
these areas. Inventories should specify site characteristics
and identify threats to sensitive areas, as well as suitability
for public use.
• Manage natural areas using a continuum approach: Based
on the inventories and the criteria established in the Natural
Area Evaluation Tool in Appendix B, the City should evaluate
sites and apply a management strategy along a continuum
from minimal maintenance to maintaining a restored natural
area.
Improve Access to Sports Fields
The sports field needs assessment revealed a significant demand
and need for additional and improved sports fields. System-wide
recommendations include the following:
• Sustain sports field level of service: The sports field level
of service standard for diamond (1/6,663) and rectangle
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
84 | CITY OF RENTON
CHAPTER FIVE
(1/10,779) is the minimum service level that is required to
meet community needs. To meet this need, the community
needs access to City fields and Renton School District fields.
• Collaborate on sport field scheduling and maintenance:
Develop a partnership model with the Renton School District
(and potentially regional partners such as Starfire Sports and
neighboring cities) that equalizes the quality of surfaces and
maintenance efforts to a standard based on the intended
level of play.
• New and improved fields at existing feasible locations:
Organized sports benefit from concentrations of fields.
Improvements to sport fields in collaboration with the school
district should target sites where there is potential for a
concentration of fields (larger school sites and potential new
parks) or improvements that increase playable time such as
artificial turf and field lights.
• Establish sports field use standards: Establish standards for
the amount of game and practice time each type of field can
support, as well as standards for field maintenance. Because
there is high demand for field use and limited supply, Renton
should adopt standards to ensure that fields are not overused
and are available for reservable practices and games.
• Sports field complex: Provide high quality, co-located fields
to meet the demand and need for a facility to support
tournament play.
Increase Recreational Variety
A variety of recreation facilities are needed, and technology should
be utilized to expand and enhance recreational facilities and
programming. A parallel Recreation and Neighborhood Strategic and
Operations Plan, which will further address facility needs, is currently
under development. Specific recommendations at the system-wide
level include:
• Introduce variety in the opportunities for children’s play:
Provide new playgrounds in underserved areas and integrate
nature play areas in parks and natural areas where possible.
The most common
reason for going to
a park is “bringing
children.” Play areas
account for 25% of
children’s park use.
Every play element
added to a playground
increases its use by
50%.
City Parks Alliance,
Recommendations
from the national Study
of Neighborhood Parks,
2019
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 85
RECOMMENDATIONS
Continue to incorporate unique and adaptive play spaces,
such as thematic playgrounds and barrier-free play areas.
• Provide more facilities to support community events and
family activities: Provide spaces and reservable facilities
(e.g., picnic shelters) in underserved areas of the City. Existing
smaller and underused spaces can be redesigned to include
amenities for events and picnics.
• Design and build off-leash dog facilities: Develop new off-
leash dog areas in new or existing park sites.
• Increase opportunities for swimming and water play:
Expand the Henry Moses Aquatic Center to create increased
capacity for programming and open swim/water play.
Consider enclosing the lap pool to provide for year-round
use. Add interactive fountains or spray parks to larger sites to
provide closer-to-home opportunities for water play.
• Improve water access: Prioritize waterfront property for
acquisition due to the rarity and multiple values it provides
the system. Continue partnerships that offer opportunities
for rowing, sailing, kayaking and canoeing. Provide enhanced
boating storage and support facilities. Seek partnerships
with established groups or organizations for increased
programming opportunities.
Connect the Park and Natural Area System
Connecting parks and trails is a top community priority. Securing the
corridors that link parks and connect neighborhoods and community
destinations are critical to providing non-motorized transportation
options and natural system benefits. The City of Renton adopted the
updated Trails and Bicycle Master Plan in 2019. The Plan reflects the
desire to create an interconnected pedestrian, and non- motorized
transportation network to accommodate recreation and commuter
uses. Based on the Trails and Bicycle Master Plan, as well as
community input generated for the Parks, Recreation and Natural
Areas Plan, system-wide recommendations include the following:
• Implement trails plan priorities: Continue to implement
priorities identified in the City’s Trails and Bicycle Master Plan
(trail map included in Appendix E).
A survey of STREAM
Team youth partici-
pants indicated:
68% have developed
skills they can use
(computer, art, science,
or language)
70% enjoy organized
games and being more
active since coming to
STREAM Team
Source: STREAM Team
Outcomes Report,
Renton Recreation and
Neighborhoods Divi-
sion, 2019
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
86 | CITY OF RENTON
CHAPTER FIVE
• Increase system-wide connectivity: Increase connectivity
between downtown, the Cedar River Planning Area and
surrounding neighborhoods.
• Support regional trails and connections: This includes the
Lake to Sound Trail, Renton Connector, Cedar River Trail, and
Eastrail corridors.
• Support trail user navigation and information needs: Create
a unified park and trail wayfinding signage system to draw
people to Renton’s parks and trails; provide informational
kiosks and signs to formalize additional trailheads.
• Remove/mitigate barriers: Address barriers facing bicycle
and pedestrian travel, such as disconnected streets and
limited crossing points due to major roadways and highways.
Build Partnerships Through Programming
The City of Renton has successfully collaborated with partners to
enhance recreation services and programming. These relationships
can be strengthened, and new partnerships developed, to extend
recreational opportunities. System-wide recommendations include:
• Build and strengthen partnerships: Collaborative
partnerships can help better utilize and maximize existing
facilities.
• Further develop the relationship with the Renton School
District: Increase use of school facilities through the
development of a strong interlocal agreement with the
Renton School District. Many Renton neighborhoods rely on
use of local schools for recreation and play.
• Focus recreational programming: Evaluate existing and
future recreation program offerings to provide evidence-
based programming based on emerging academic research.
• Base programming decisions on recreation data: The City
should rely on data collected from recreation program
registration, attendance and regional trends to help evaluate
future offerings and scheduling.
Programming each
additional supervised
activity increased
park use by 48% and
physical activity by
37%. Programming
can help attract more
seniors and teen girls—
both underrepresented
in parks.
City Parks Alliance,
Recommendations
from the National
Study of Neighborhood
Parks, 2019
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 87
RECOMMENDATIONS
RECOMMENDATIONS BY
COMMUNITY PLANNING AREA
Recommendations for the City’s ten Community Planning Areas are
noted below. Each section includes a description of the Community
Planning Area, a list of recommended projects and bulleted
recommendations.
Community Planning Areas
Ten Community Planning Areas were established by the Renton
City Council in 2009 to reflect unique factors such as community
identity, physical features, schools, data collection units, existing
infrastructure, service areas, districts, boundaries and community
access. The ten Community Planning Areas were utilized through this
process and are illustrated in Figure 5.1.
COMMUNITY PLANNING AREAS
Benson .................89
Cedar River .......93
City Center .......97
East Plateau ...101
Highlands .........105
Kennydale .........109
Talbot .....................111
Valley ......................113
West Hill ..............115
Fairwood .............116
Area Page
Figure 5.1: Community Planning Areas
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
88 | CITY OF RENTON
CHAPTER FIVE
This page intentionally left blank
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 89
RECOMMENDATIONS
DESCRIPTION
The Benson Community Planning Area was annexed into the City
by an election in 2007 (effective 2008). The area includes over four
square miles of land in southeast Renton. This large area currently
includes two developed neighborhood parks owned by the City
(Tiffany Park and Cascade Park) and two additional developed parks
which remain under King County’s management (Boulevard Lane
Park and Renton Park). It is bordered by the Cedar River Natural
Area to the north and the King County managed (undeveloped) Soos
Creek Corridor to the east. The Renton School District operates seven
facilities in this area, including four elementary, one middle, one high
school and one alternative program.
The area is primarily composed of single-family homes, with a denser
cluster of residences and commercial activity centered generally
between SE 168th and SE Petrovitsky on 116th Ave SE. The area is
crossed by several major utility corridors, many of which have been
used as informal transportation and recreation links.
The majority of the Benson area has little or no access to developed
parks and minimal public land. Expanding park service in this area
will be a challenge. While both large and small parks are needed
to provide local access, the priority expressed by the community is
to start with a larger, multi-purpose site. Until more parks can be
added, connections and other facilities will be critical, particularly
developing the Soos Creek Trail (King County).
Acquire and Develop a New Community Park: 1 The long-standing
need for a new community recreation center in the Benson Area is
being fulfilled through a unique community partnership. The Family
First Community Center is a joint project of the City of Renton, the
Projects
• Benson Community Park
• Tiffany Park
• Cascade Park
• SE 186th Place Properties
• Soos Creek Greenway: Boulevard Lane
• Parkwood South Div #3 Park
• Soos Creek Greenway: Renton Park
• Benson Neighborhood Park 1
• Benson Neighborhood Park 2
BENSON
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
90 | CITY OF RENTON
CHAPTER FIVE
Family First Community Center Foundation, the Renton School District
and HealthPoint that aims to create a building and set of programs
that help families achieve goals in education, fitness and overall
health. Fundraising is ongoing for the construction of the center,
which is planned to open in 2021.
Enhance and Connect Tiffany and Cascade Parks: 2 The City has
acquired additional land between these two park sites that should
be enhanced as a natural area and trail. Additional acquired land
along 126th Avenue has added to the access and visibility of Cascade
Park. Additional land purchase opportunities should be monitored
to further open access and connect these parks. Both sites should
be renovated to update, add and reorganize facilities. Cascade Park
should be considered for an off-leash dog area and Tiffany Park has
the potential to daylight a creek; restoring a natural feature long
hidden underground. As part of the improvements to these sites,
formal connections should be made to access utility corridors that
are currently used as trails, also necessitating formalized agreements
with utility companies. When the two parks are connected and linked
to these long pedestrian routes, the Tiffany/Cascade Park complex
will become a hub for nature, environmental learning and trail
activity. The concept plan in Chapter 7 provides a vison for these
improvements.
Add and Develop Park Land: To increase access to basic park
features, a number of additional neighborhood parks are needed in
the Benson Community Planning Area. Two small sites are owned by
the City (both transferred from King County) but neither come close
to the minimum size needed to provide the desired features of a
neighborhood park. At the Parkwood South Division #3 Park sites the
City should evaluate the property’s potential for park use due to small
size and separation. The best opportunity or use for the SE 186th
Place Properties is a playground, community garden or a tree nursery.
In the Benson planning area, augmenting Renton School District sites
will be a key strategy to providing park service. The City should work
with the School District to secure increased access to indoor facilities
for programming through negotiated agreements. The City should also
work with the District to acquire small park sites adjacent to schools
to provide access to play opportunities.
Beyond the existing parks and school sites, two additional
neighborhood park sites should be identified. 3 4 Both identified
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 91
RECOMMENDATIONS
SE 168th St
SE Petrovitsky Rd
124th Ave SE116th Ave SEPuget Dr SEBenson
D
r
S
S 3rd St
Soos Creek Park and Trail
RentonPark
Soos CreekPark and Trail
BoulevardLane Park
MaplewoodGolf CourseCedar RiverNatural Area
EdlundProperty
CascadePark
Cleveland /Richardson Property
Panther CreekWetlands
PhilipArnold Park
TianyPark
ThomasTeasdale Park
N.A.R.COProperty
Lindbergh
High School
Fred Nelsen
Middle School
Cascade
Elementary
School
Benson Hill
Elementary School
Renton Park
Elementary
Tiany Park
Elementary School
New Horizon
School
CedarRiver Park
RiverviewPark MaplewoodPark
Talbot HillReservoir Park
Sit InPark
ParkwoodSouth Park
SE 186th PlaceProperties
BurnettLinear Park
Lake StreetOpen Space
TonkinPark
Piazza & Gateway
Parks Provided by Others
Regional Park
Community Park
Neighborhood Park Linkage
Park Recommendation
Location
Natural Area
Trail Corridor
Special Use
Future Park
#
Benson Planning Area
1
23
4
gap areas are hilly and isolated from
other parks by distance and topography.
Partner for Indoor Programming
Space: As noted above, schools will be
important assets to expanding park and
recreation access into Benson and the
Family First Community Center will be
a major new asset in this area when it
opens.
Complete Soos Creek Corridor: The
City should continue collaborating with
King County to expand and connect
the Soos Creek properties to protect
the creek and surrounding habitat and
provide a regional trail connection
which also will connect with the Cedar
River Trail. With the completion of the
Soos Creek Trail, one park and one
natural area (Boulevard Lane Park and
Renton Park) could be transferred to
the City for operation and management.
Renton Park should be developed to
connect with the adjacent Renton
Park Elementary and Lindberg High
School serving as an outdoor learning
environment.
Integrate Utility Corridors: The City
should actively pursue agreements
with the utility companies that
maintain corridors through the Benson
Community Planning Area and other
parts of Renton. These corridors
currently provide informal access
to pedestrians, hikers and cyclists.
However, because of their informal
status, the City has no authority to
improve trails or provide better access.
Agreements should outline roles and
responsibilities as well as the limitations
and requirements of the utility use.
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
92 | CITY OF RENTON
CHAPTER FIVE
This page intentionally left blank
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 93
RECOMMENDATIONS
DESCRIPTION
The Cedar River Community Planning Area follows the Cedar River
and the Maple Valley Highway from Interstate 405 to the Renton city
limits. Many of the well-known, most-used parks in the system are
located within this Community Planning Area, along with the largest
natural area. There are several small developments of high- and
low- density housing along the highway corridor that are relatively
isolated from each other and the remainder of the city.
The Cedar River Community Planning Area contains the largest
portion of a recreation corridor that extends from Lake Washington
to Renton’s eastern city limits. Most of the community’s signature
natural areas, recreation sites and facilities are located within this
region. The improvements to the system in this area are focused on
the enhancement of existing sites and facilities to increase capacity
and quality.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Implement the Tri-Park Master Plan: This Community Planning Area
includes two of the three Tri-Park Master Plan sites, Cedar River
Park and the N.A.R.CO property. The Riverside: Tri-Park Concept
Plan for all three parks (incorporating Liberty Park as well) presented
in Chapter 7 envisions reconfiguring many of the existing uses to
take better advantage of the riverfront, maximize the sports field
concentrations and expand the Henry Moses Aquatic Center and the
Renton Community Center. This set of opportunities would recognize
the role these sites play as a central hub of Renton’s parks, recreation
and natural areas system.
CEDAR RIVER
Projects
• Cedar River Park
• Ron Regis Park
• Cedar River Natural Area
• N.A.R.CO Property
• Cedar River Trail Corridor
• Maplewood Golf Course
• Riverview Park
• Maplewood Roadside Park
• Maplewood Park
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
94 | CITY OF RENTON
CHAPTER FIVE
Provide Additional Sport Fields: Two sites in this Community
Planning Area offer the best existing opportunity to provide clusters
of sports fields in Renton. The fields planned as part of the Riverside:
Tri-Park Concept Plan at Cedar River Park and the N.A.R.CO property
1 will provide a central home for field sports, as originally shown
in the Tri-Park Master Plan. Washington State Department of
Transportation will provide or contribute to these improvements as
part of I-405 expansion projects. The overall Riverside Park complex
has the relatively unique suitability for tournament level play.
Fields should be designed to maximize the flexibility of field layout
for different sizes of fields and alternate combined configurations
(such as a cricket pitch). Existing and additional planned fields at
Ron Regis Park 2 should receive playing surface and equipment
improvements as well as utility connections to provide potable water
service to this site.
Manage Cedar River Natural Area: As the largest of the City’s major
natural areas, and associated with the most significant waterway, the
Cedar River Natural Area 3 should be a priority for inventory and
management plan development, utilizing the continuum approach
described in the Natural Area Evaluation Tool (Appendix B). As part
of this effort, the City should identify and formalize access points for
stewardship activities as well as trail use. Invasive species treatment
should emphasize areas that have the greatest risk for further
spread, both within the site and beyond, such as the river edge,
SW 27th St
1
5
4
t
h
P
l
S
E156th Ave SEPuget Dr SES 3rd St
Soos Creek Parkand Trail
MaplewoodCommunity Park
Cavanaugh PondNatural Area
Cedar River to LakeSammamish Trail Site
CascadePark
HeritageParkRenton
High School
Fred Nelsen
Middle School
Cascade
Elementary
School
Talbot Hill
Elementary
School
Tiany Park
Elementary School
Maple Heights
Elementary School
St. Anthony's
School
CedarRiver Park
LibertyPark
RiverviewPark
MaplewoodPark
JonesPark
Senior ActivityCenter Property
Sit InPark
ParkwoodSouth Park
BurnettLinear Park
TonkinPark
Maplewood Roadside Park
Piazza & Gateway
Veterans Memorial Park
Parks Provided by Others
Regional Park
Community Park
Neighborhood Park
Linkage
Park Recommendation
Location
Natural Area
Trail Corridor
Special Use
Future Park
#
Cedar River
Planning Area 1
23
Ron RegisPark
MaplewoodGolf CourseCedar RiverNatural AreaPhilipArnold Park
TianyPark
N.A.R.COProperty
1
4
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 95
RECOMMENDATIONS
streams and creeks. The management plan should be coordinated
between Renton, King County and other organizations involved
in improving this watershed which provides regional recreation.
Managing and maintaining the transition zones between the natural
area and developed features planned at the N.A.R.CO property and
the regional trail will be critical to the health of the natural systems
and visitor safety. The role of this natural area in protecting the
Cedar River, the site’s accessibility and the proximity to existing
programming locations, make this site a prime opportunity for
enhanced environmental programming and interpretation.
Balance Indoor Programming Space: The Renton Community Center,
at Cedar River Park 4 , is the largest indoor recreation facility
provided by the City of Renton. Specific programs will be subject to
additional analysis based on recreation program registration data,
with important consideration given to the availability of indoor
spaces for programming that reaches all community members.
Partnerships could increase youth programming availability across
the city.
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
96 | CITY OF RENTON
CHAPTER FIVE
This page intentionally left blank
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 97
RECOMMENDATIONS
DESCRIPTION
The core of Renton, the City Center Planning Area includes the
historic downtown as well as the transitioning and industrial lands
north to the edge of Lake Washington. Several signature Renton
parks are located within City Center, including Gene Coulon Memorial
Beach Park, the Piazza, Liberty Park and Cedar River Trail Park. The
area also includes many community facilities, including those owned
by the City and two sites owned by the Renton School District. The
character of this area varies greatly from industrial and airport uses
to single family homes near downtown main streets to a destination
mixed-use center at The Landing. In addition, a new transit center
is planned for the former Sound Ford site, as is a mixed-use
redevelopment, bringing residential use to an area where there is
currently none.
CITY CENTER
Projects
• Senior Activity Center Property
• Liberty Park (as part of the Riverside: Tri-Park concept plan)
• Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park
• Corridor Acquisition
• Cedar River Trail Park
• Burnett Linear Park
• Philip Arnold Park
• Community Garden/Greenhouse
• Piazza, Gateway and former Big 5 lot
• City Center Neighborhood Park 1
• Boeing EIS Waterfront Park
• Veterans Memorial Park
• Tonkin Park
• Jones Park
• Sam Chastain Waterfront Trail
• Sit-In Park
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
98 | CITY OF RENTON
CHAPTER FIVE
The current and planned density of this area, and the diversity of
activities require a range of sites as well as flexible use. With the
Downtown Civic Core Vision and Action Plan and the City Center
Community Plan in place, the area is poised for population and
economic growth that will increase the demands on the relatively
limited existing park spaces. Key improvements, such as the Philip
Arnold Park Renovation, to increase access and capacity will improve
the City Center’s ability to serve as the heart of Renton.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Connect Cedar River Trail Park and Gene Coulon Memorial Beach
Park: To complete a long-standing vision of a waterfront connection
along Lake Washington, the City should build the Sam Chastain
Waterfront Trail 1 utilizing easements (some already acquired) and
final easement acquisition as feasible.
Expand and Redevelop Senior Activity Center Site: The City should
relocate the shop facilities located between the Senior Activity Center
and the Community Garden (including the greenhouse) to allow for
expansion of this site and a broader set of activities. A new master
plan for this park should be developed for integration with the Renton
Senior Activity Center and the adjacent neighborhood. With no name
existing for this entire site, it is identified as City Center Neighborhood
Park 1 2 in this Plan. This site should be designed for neighborhood
scale activity while recognizing that this will be in the heart of the city,
near downtown and on the Cedar River Trail. As a result, this park
should be designed for higher intensity use.
Enlarge and Enhance Existing Sites: The City should seek
opportunities to expand or enhance several sites within the City
Center Community Planning Area. Major renovation of Gene Coulon
Memorial Beach Park is ongoing. Redevelopment of the Piazza
Gateway park site and former Big 5 lot should include a plaza and
other complementary outdoor spaces allowing activities to extend
beyond the existing park, creating a civic center.
Connect Regional Trail Systems: City Center includes the critical
connections between major regional trail systems including the Cedar
River Trail, Lake to Sound Trail and Renton Connector. Burnett Linear
Park should be expanded north to the area currently used as parking;
strengthening the link between this park, Tonkin Park, the Piazza and
the Cedar River Trail, referred to as the Renton Connector 3 . Each
of these has a specific implementation plan and the completion is
Renton’s older adults
have voiced interest
in social, educational,
and preventive health
focused programs.
Source: Renton Older
Adults Community
Needs Assessment,
Renton Senior Activity
Center, 2019
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 99
RECOMMENDATIONS
supported by the Downtown Civic Core
Vision and Action Plan and the Trails
and Bicycle Master Plan.
Secure Land for Future Parks: In
addition to the master plan for the site
adjacent to the Renton Senior Activity
Center, the 2003 Boeing Renton
Comprehensive Plan Amendment EIS
identifies a 75-acre park providing a
potential connection to Gene Coulon
Memorial Beach Park and the Cedar
River Trail. Additional land should be
acquired to provide overflow parking
for Gene Coulon Memorial Beach
Park, with an improved connection
between the park and residential
and commercial development at The
Landing 4 . This improvement will
only occur if the Boeing Company
should decide to surplus the existing
manufacturing facilities. This would be
a truly rare opportunity for future park
development, shaping the future of
central Renton. Based on the priorities
of the community, the most important
land to secure within the current
Boeing properties would be the
waterfront between Cedar River Trail
Park and Gene Coulon Memorial Beach
Park. The exact configuration of this
new site should be carefully planned
to further economic and community
development and improve connectivity
between Coulon Park and the Cedar
River Trail.
Enhance the Cedar River: The Cedar
River is the major natural feature in
the City Center Planning Area and the
river and salmon run are closely tied
to Renton’s identity. The City should
SW 27th St
SE 168th StPark Ave NSE Petrovitsky Rd
SW Grady Way
116th Ave SEW
M
e
r
c
e
r
W
a
y
Puget Dr SEBenson
D
r
SLogan Ave NSW 41st St
S 3rd St
SW 7th St 87th Ave SLake Wa
sh
ing
ton
B
lvd
N
LakeridgePark
Bryn Mawr
LakeWashington
Cedar R
iver
RentonMunicipalAirport
Black RiverRiparian Forest
Panther CreekWetlands
Gene CoulonMemorial Beach Park
RentonWetlands
EdlundPropertyRentonWetlandsPanther CreekWetlands
PhilipArnold Park
May CreekGreenway
ThomasTeasdale Park
Highlands Park andNeighborhood Center
KennydaleLions Park
WindsorHills Park
EarlingtonPark
SpringbrookTrail
KennydaleBeach Park
KenyonDobson Property
Renton
High School
Fred Nelsen
Middle School
Cascade
Elementary
School
John Mcknight
Jr High School
Talbot Hill
Elementary
School
Tiany Park
Elementary School
Sartori
Elementary School
Kennydale
Elementary School
St. Anthony's
School
Lake StreetOpen Space
Parks Provided by Others
Regional Park
Community Park
Neighborhood Park Linkage
Park Recommendation
Location
Natural Area
Trail Corridor
Special Use
Future Park
#
City Center Planning Area
1
2
3
4
5
CedarRiver Park
LibertyPark
JonesPark
Senior ActivityCenter Property
Sit InPark
BurnettLinear Park
TonkinPark
Piazza & Gateway
Veterans Memorial Park
Cedar RiverTrail Park
N.A.R.COProperty
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
100 | CITY OF RENTON
CHAPTER FIVE
develop an enhancement and stabilization program along the Cedar
River as well as continue its partnership with Forterra. Stabilization
should improve and protect the health of the trees that anchor the
bank as well as control invasive species. Invasive species control
will likely involve removal and treatments beyond this Community
Planning Area.
Explore Creative Partnerships: The businesses and organizations
located in City Center offer a wide range of programming
possibilities. As part of the in-process Recreation and Neighborhoods
Strategic and Operations Plan, the City should explore how to
involve additional local businesses and community organizations.
One opportunity identified during the planning process involves
collaborating with the Boeing Company’s employee health program
to identify walks and fitness opportunities in proximity to Boeing
facilities for employees to participate in during lunch breaks or
before/after work.
Implement Tri-Park Master Plan and Riverside: Tri-Park Concept
Plan for Liberty Park: See also Cedar River Community Planning Area
recommendations for implementation of the Tri-Park Master Plan.
Expand and enhance the community building at Liberty Park 5 for
environmental education programming. Sam Chastain Waterfront TrailCCIITTYY OOFF RREENNTTOONN
Sam Chastain Waterfront Trail Concept
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 101
RECOMMENDATIONS
Projects
• East Plateau Community Park
• May Creek Park
• East Plateau Neighborhood Park 1
• East Plateau Neighborhood Park 2
DESCRIPTION
The East Plateau Planning Area makes up the eastern edge of the City
of Renton, north of the Cedar River. Much of this planning area is
outside of the current city limits. The East Plateau has no developed
City-owned parks and nearly the entire planning area is outside the
½ mile range of developed parks. Five school sites are located within
the planning area, including schools in both the Renton and Issaquah
districts. The character of this area is primarily residential with a high
density commercial and residential corridor along NE 4th Street. There
are many disconnected streets due to topography, stream corridors
and development patterns.
The most notable need in East Plateau is for designated park land
to accommodate the recreation opportunities most desired by the
community. The population in this area benefits from some access
to natural areas, primarily those owned by King County. Residents of
this area use school facilities and travel to other parts of the city for
gathering places and indoor programming.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Add a New Community Park: The City should acquire the Maplewood
Community Park and Maplewood Neighborhood Park sites 1 from
King County with the intention of developing a unified community park
connecting to the adjacent Maplewood Heights Elementary School.
Following acquisition, the site should be master planned with input
from the community about the specific features and design elements.
Key features for a community park in this area are a concentration
of sports fields (adding to existing fields at the elementary school),
creating a community gathering space and maintaining the forested
area with trails (see concept plan in Chapter 7).
EAST PLATEAU
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
102 | CITY OF RENTON
CHAPTER FIVE
Develop May Creek Park: 2 Located in the north end of the
planning area, this park has remained undeveloped for many years.
The site is located in a residential area that currently does not
have access to a park within a 10 minute walk. This site should be
developed as soon as funding can be secured. Access to this property
is currently limited from Duvall Avenue and should be expanded by
developing trail easements to the east and connecting local trails.
The concept plan (in Chapter 7) can be used as a starting point to
identify potential elements and the relationships between features.
Identify and Develop Two New Neighborhood Parks: Within the
current city limits, at least two additional neighborhood parks
are needed to provide basic recreation amenities within a 10
minute walk (½ mile) of residents. The first of these, East Plateau
Neighborhood Park 1 3 , should be located in the area south of
Sunset Boulevard and east of Duvall, near Oliver Hazen High School.
The high school campus has the potential to augment a future public
park. The second additional park site (East Plateau Neighborhood
Park 2) 4 should be near NE 4th Street, close to the planned higher
residential and commercial density. This area has no existing publicly
owned land and will require acquiring between 5 and 10 acres of
park land that should be connected to bike and pedestrian routes.
New neighborhood parks should be master planned and developed
according to the design guidelines.
Plan for Annexation Areas: If the City expands into the remaining
parts of the potential annexation area, additional park sites will
need to be located, potentially including the King County owned
Maplewood Heights Park property.
Provide Key Connections: The following trail and bicycle routes
are particularly important to improving access to and from this
Community Planning Area as well as within it.
• The May Creek corridor crosses the north edge of the
planning area and additional protected land would provide
habitat and serve recreation needs.
• King County’s planned Cedar to Sammamish Regional Trail
connects this area to the Cedar River Planning Area to the
south and exits the city to the north east.
• The east-west bicycle routes planned along Sunset Boulevard
and NE 4th/SE 128th Street.
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 103
RECOMMENDATIONS
• Shared streets connecting to
Highlands and extending east
out of the City.
Enhancing Existing Natural Areas:
The City should support King County
and City of Newcastle efforts to
complete habitat restoration projects
utilizing volunteers and partnerships
such as the Mountain to Sound
Greenway. Residents of this area who
participated in the planning process
indicated a desire to maintain natural
elements within park sites.
Acquire Natural Areas: The City
should continue its partnership
with King County and the City of
Newcastle to identify and acquire
natural area land that connects creek
corridors such as May Creek. Natural
area acquisitions in this Community
Planning Area should have the
potential to serve as habitat or trail
corridors or expand existing protected
areas.
Programming and Facility
Partnerships: Partnering with
both the Renton and Issaquah
School Districts will be important
to providing programming options
in the East Plateau. As the City of
Renton expands into the Potential
Annexation Area, a school partnership
with the Issaquah District should be
considered.
1
5
4
t
h
P
l
S
E
NE 4th St
SE May V
a
l
l
e
y
R
d
156th Ave SESE 128th St164th Ave SEUnion Ave NEHoquiam Ave NELake Youngs Watershed
Cougar MountainRegional Wildland Park
Soos Creek Parkand Trail
Petrovitsky Park
May ValleyCounty Park
RentonPark
CoaleldPark
MaplewoodHeights Park
McGarvey Park Open Space
Lake YoungsCounty Park
Cavanaugh PondNatural Area
Cedar River to LakeSammamish Trail Site
May Creek Greenway
Ricardi ReachNatural Area
Ron RegisPark
MaplewoodGolf Course
CascadePark
KiwanisPark
HeritagePark
Honey Dew
School
Sierra Heights
Elementary School
Renton Park
Elementary
Maple Heights
Elementary School Briarwood School
Liberty High School
Maywood Middle School
GlencoePark
Sunset NeighborhoodPark
1
2
3
4
Parks Provided by Others
Regional Park
Community Park
Neighborhood Park Linkage
Park Recommendation
Location
Natural Area
Trail Corridor
Special Use
Future Park
#
East Plateau Planning Area
May Creek Park
MaplewoodCommunity Park
Hazen
High School
1
3
2
4
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
104 | CITY OF RENTON
CHAPTER FIVE
This page intentionally left blank
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 105
RECOMMENDATIONS
DESCRIPTION
The Highlands Community Planning Area is located on a plateau
above the City Center Community Planning Area and the Cedar River
in northwest Renton. This area includes a wide range of park lands
from very small neighborhood parks to large natural area properties
along Honey and May Creeks. The Renton School District operates
five elementary and middle schools in or immediately adjacent to the
Highlands Planning Area. There are two corridors of higher density
residential and commercial development along the major east-west
routes, following Sunset Boulevard and NE 3rd/4th Streets. The
hills descending from the plateau, Interstate 405 and limited street
connections isolate this area for pedestrians and cyclists.
The City should focus on maximizing the use of the extensive
community investment in park land and facilities in this area.
Some of the older parks in the Highlands need design updates and
new features which could better serve this area’s population. The
renovation of Kiwanis Park is one such improvement. In addition,
while this Community Planning Area has the best overall coverage
of parks (minimal gaps in service), some parks do not meet size
recommendations and/or the ½ mile service area access distance.
Linking the park system to institutional partners, including the
Renton School District, Renton Technical College and King County
Libraries may enhance access to programs and decrease facility
gaps in the system. Completion of Sunset Neighborhood Park and
the Meadow Crest Accessible Playground are excellent examples of
how updates, new features and institutional partners can enhance
Renton’s parks.
HIGHLANDS
Projects
• Highlands Park and Neighborhood Center
• Honey Creek Greenway
• Sunset Neighborhood Park
• North Highlands Park and Neighborhood Center
• Highlands Neighborhood Park 1
• Highlands Neighborhood Park 2
• Glencoe Park
• Kiwanis Park
• Heritage Park
• Windsor Hills Park
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
106 | CITY OF RENTON
CHAPTER FIVE
RECOMMENDATIONS
Maximize Highlands Park and Neighborhood Center: Located
geographically at the center of the Highlands Planning Area 1 , this
site serves as the only community park for most of east Renton.
Additional land to the south has been added to the site which has
yet to be integrated into the overall design. The park also shares a
property line with Highlands Elementary School. Increasing density
also increases demand on park sites. To better serve this community,
the City should begin a long-term process of planning and designing
a completely reconfigured Highlands Park and Neighborhood Center
as shown on the concept plan in Chapter 7. This site should retain
current park amenities but reconfigure them to accommodate a
larger, multi-generational indoor facility with additional features to
include a learning garden and a skateboarding area. The reconfigured
park should also maintain the designated Safe Routes to School.
North Highlands Park and Neighborhood Center: Renovate or
redevelop the park and neighborhood center to better meet
community needs 2 .
Implement Sunset Planned Action EIS: The City should continue to
implement the adopted Sunset Planned Action Environmental Impact
Statement. This project is a collaborative redevelopment involving
Housing Authority property, a new library and Sunset Neighborhood
Park 3 . The first phase of the park is complete and the second,
final, phase is scheduled to be completed in 2020. Programming
and maintenance of the new park should recognize the anticipated
high level of use and the relationship to the other features of the
redevelopment plan, especially the library. Other improvements tied
to the redevelopment include integrated stormwater management
approaches that will include non-motorized connections to the site.
Add New Park Sites: The Highlands Community Planning Area
is well served by parks within ½ mile of residents. However, two
areas remain underserved. The first gap, a new proposed Highlands
Neighborhood Park 1 4 , should be north of Sunset Boulevard and
west of Duvall. This area has a neighborhood park (Glencoe Park)
which does not meet acreage recommendations to serve this area;
when locating Highlands Neighborhood Park 1 these two sites should
be considered together to provide service in this area. A second
proposed park, Highlands Neighborhood Park 2 5 , would serve
the residential area in the southern most portion of the Community
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 107
RECOMMENDATIONS
Planning Area. This park would serve
the higher density residential area.
Expand and Develop Windsor Hills
Park: 6 Property surrounding this site
should be monitored for acquisition
opportunities to expand the park to
the minimum 2-acre guideline, open
up park access, and increase visibility
and functionality. Ultimately this park
should be developed using the concept
plan (Chapter 7) for guidance. New
features include a fenced dog park with
agility area, natural play features and
hillside slides.
NE 4th St
Puget Dr SEUnion Ave NELake Wa
sh
ing
ton
B
lvd
NHoquiam Ave NEMay Creek Greenway
MaplewoodGolf CourseCedar RiverNatural Area
PhilipArnold Park
Tiany
Park
May CreekGreenway
KennydaleLions Park
N.A.R.COProperty
Honey Dew
School
Lindbergh
High School
Cascade
Elementary
School
Sierra Heights
Elementary School
John Mcknight
Jr High School
Renton Technical
College
Tiany Park
Elementary School
Highlands
Elem School
Maple Heights
Elementary School
Early Childhood
Learning Center
Hazen
High School
CedarRiver Park
RiverviewPark
Talbot HillReservoir Park
Sit InPark
GlencoePark
ParkwoodSouth Park
BENSON
PLANNING AREA
Parks Provided by Others
Regional Park
Community Park
Neighborhood Park Linkage
Park Recommendation
Location
Natural Area
Trail Corridor
Special Use
Future Park
#
Highlands Planning Area
1
2
3
4
5
6
KiwanisPark
HeritagePark
Highlands Park andNeighborhood Center
WindsorHills Park
Honey CreekGreenway
North Highlands Park andNeighborhood Center
Sunset NeighborhoodPark
Meadow CrestAccessible Playground
May Creek Park
KenyonDobson Property
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
108 | CITY OF RENTON
CHAPTER FIVE
This page intentionally left blank
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 109
RECOMMENDATIONS
DESCRIPTION
The northern most tip of Renton, the Kennydale Community Planning
Area includes Kennydale neighborhoods on both the east and west
sides of Interstate 405. This area includes two developed parks and
portions of the May Creek Greenway, where the City developed the
first soft-surface trail along the creek. The Renton School District
has one elementary school in the area. The majority of this area is
low density residential, with mixed use commercial and residential
property at the far north edge. Connections across Interstate 405 are
limited. The May Creek Greenway also isolates a pocket of housing
near the Newcastle border. The area encompasses substantial natural
areas but does not necessarily provide access. The City of Renton,
in partnership with King County and the City of Newcastle, has been
acquiring property along the greenway since 1990 in order to make
a trail and greenway connection from Lake Washington to Cougar
Mountain Regional Wildland Park.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Expand Access to the May Creek Greenway: Acquisitions by Renton
and King County in the Kennydale Community Planning Area have
resulted in a nearly continuous swath of greenway across Renton’s
northern border and acquiring the missing links is essential.
Coordination with the City of Newcastle and King County (bridge
May Creek in Renton over to Newcastle) is also recommended.
Approximately fifty percent of the May Creek Greenway in Kennydale
is owned by King County. The City should work with King County to
create a natural area management plan that includes identifying
appropriate access points to the greenway and developing trails that
allow for stewardship and recreation in a natural setting.
KENNYDALE
Projects
• May Creek Greenway
• Kennydale Beach Park
• Kennydale Lions Park
• Kennydale Neighborhood Park 1
• Kennydale Neighborhood Park 2
• Kenyon Dobson Park
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
110 | CITY OF RENTON
CHAPTER FIVE
Enhance Three Existing Park Sites: The
two developed parks in the Community
Planning Area are key to local identity
and community gathering. Kennydale
Beach Park is a summertime staple but
is severely constrained by neighboring
properties and the former railroad, which
is now the site of the regional Eastrail.
Renton should capitalize on water access
and the associated natural areas. The
City should monitor adjacent properties
for opportunities to purchase land to
expand this park. Kennydale Lions Park is
an under-developed asset. A full redesign
of this site should be completed using
community input and the City’s park
design guidelines. Chapter 7 includes a
concept for this park that provides one
idea for the future of this expanded site.
Kenyon Dobson Park should be improved
with a nature center and trailhead for May
Creek Trail, serving as a future connection
to the City of Newcastle’s developed May
Creek Trail.
Provide Two Additional Neighborhood
Parks: The City should add park sites to
the isolated pockets of this area, although
the availability of appropriate land will
be a major challenge. On the west side
of Interstate 405 in Kennydale, the only
developed park is the small Kennydale
Beach Park. While a highly valued site,
the size and waterfront location of this
park limit its use for some types of park
activities. If the site cannot be expanded,
an additional neighborhood park should
be added to this area 1 . A second
neighborhood park should also be added
east of the freeway and north of the May
Creek Greenway 2 .116th Ave NEE Mercer WayPark Ave NLogan Ave NS 3rd St Lake Wa
sh
ing
ton
B
lvd
N
ClarkeBeach Park
MERCER
ISLAND
LakeWashington
Cedar R
iver
§¨¦405
Gene CoulonMemorial Beach Park
KiwanisPark
Cedar RiverTrail Park
May CreekGreenway
Highlands Park andNeighborhood Center
Kennydale
Lions Park
Honey CreekGreenway
EarlingtonPark
North Highlands Park andNeighborhood Center
KennydaleBeach Park
Renton
High School
John Mcknight
Jr High School
Renton Technical
College
Highlands
Elem School
Early Childhood
Learning Center
Sartori
Elementary School
Kennydale
Elementary School
St. Anthony's
School
Cedar
River Park
LibertyParkJonesPark
Senior ActivityCenter Property
Sunset NeighborhoodPark
Parks Provided by Others
Regional Park
Community Park
Neighborhood Park Linkage
Park Recommendation
Location
Natural Area
Trail Corridor
Special Use
Future Park
#
Kennydale Planning Area
1 2
KenyonDobson Property
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 111
RECOMMENDATIONS
DESCRIPTION
The Talbot Community Planning Area is located in southwest Renton
extending south from Interstate 405 between SR-167 and SR-515/108th
Avenue SE and south to the city limits. The Planning Area includes two
developed parks and substantial natural area acreage. In addition,
two properties have been acquired for future neighborhood parks
in the southern half of the area. Talbot is primarily residential with a
commercial corridor connecting the Valley and Benson Community
Planning Areas along SW 43rd Street/S Carr Road. This corridor includes
Valley Medical Center. A cluster of high density residential property
extends south from SW 43rd on either side of 96th Avenue South.
Connections within this area and beyond are challenging due to the
hills, a disconnected street pattern and freeway barrier to the west.
Developing existing park land in the south and the management
and maintenance of natural areas should be a focus for the City. The
properties acquired for new neighborhood parks have development
constraints due to wetlands. There are also opportunities for
integrating and interpreting the natural features and historic
landscapes and structures.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Expand/Connect Panther Creek Wetlands: The City has acquired
substantial natural area land extending from the intersection of SR
167 and Interstate 405 to just north of the Valley Medical Center
campus at SW 43rd Street. The City should continue to expand the
protected acreage along Panther Creek and develop trail connections
that provide access for enjoyment of nature and stewardship activities.
The expansion of this natural area should include a connection via
additional acquisitions or easements east to the developed portion of
Projects
• Panther Creek Wetlands
• Edlund Property
• Cleveland Richardson Property
• Thomas Teasdale Park
• Talbot Hill Reservoir Park
• Springbrook Watershed
• Lake Street Open Space
• Panther Creek/Edlund Property
TALBOT
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
112 | CITY OF RENTON
CHAPTER FIVE
the Edlund Property and west to the Springbrook
Wetland Mitigation Bank 1 . Lake Street Open
Space, a small undeveloped property, should be
utilized as a future trailhead.
Design and Develop Undeveloped Park Sites: The
two undeveloped neighborhood park sites (Edlund
Property and Cleveland Richardson Property)
should be master planned and designed to
integrate the natural and historic elements as well
as features that support gatherings, recreation
and fitness 2 3 . Following the completion of
the master planning process, these sites should be
developed as soon as funding can be identified.
Both sites have the potential to serve large
residential areas that are currently outside of a 10
minute walk to a park. Chapter 7 includes concept
designs that provide ideas for the future of these
two sites. Access to each site should be maximized
by creating trail connections to the neighboring
residential areas and to nearby parks and natural
areas.
Partner to Foster Health and Wellness: In
partnership with Valley Medical Center there could
be increased opportunities to develop healthy
lifestyle programming for residents, employers/
employees and visitors that utilize both City
facilities and the medical center campus. Valley
Medical will also have access to a future trail
connecting to the Panther Creek Wetlands 4 and
the Edlund property. A partnership between the
City and Valley Medical Center could be pursued to
develop a trailhead.
Strategic Reinvestment in Existing Parks: Two
additional parks, Thomas Teasdale Park and Talbot
Hill Reservoir Park 5 are located close together
in the north portion of Talbot. As reinvestment
is required, these two sites should be planned
together to differentiate the opportunities
provided and maximize the use of the available
park land.Talbot Rd SSW 27th St
SE 168th St
SE Petrovitsky Rd
SW Grady Way
Puget Dr SEBenson
D
r
S
SW 41st St
SW 7th StMetroWaterwork Park
ST716
SpringbrookWatershed
Panther CreekWetlands
RentonWetlands
EdlundProperty
RentonWetlands
Cleveland Richardson Property
Panther CreekWetlands
PhilipArnold Park
ThomasTeasdale Park
SpringbrookTrail
Fred Nelsen
Middle School
Benson Hill
Elementary School
Talbot Hill
Elementary
School
New Horizon
School
St. Anthony's
School
Talbot HillReservoir Park ParkwoodSouth Park
SE 186th PlaceProperties
Lake StreetOpen Space
1
1
2
3
4
5
Parks Provided by Others
Regional Park
Community Park
Neighborhood Park
Linkage
Park
Recommendation
Location
Natural Area
Trail Corridor
Special Use
Future Park
#
Talbot Planning Area
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 113
RECOMMENDATIONS
DESCRIPTION
The Valley Community Planning Area makes up the west edge of
Renton in the lowlands immediately east of the Green River. The
area is a contrast of light industrial, commercial and office park
development against preserved and restored wetlands and green
spaces. In addition to the two Renton owned sites, King County owns
the Waterworks Garden site incorporated in the regional waste water
treatment plant. With excellent access and a history of office park
and other industrial and commercial uses, this area is focused on
employment. A new Kaiser Permanente health campus is a major
employer in this area with a particular interest in community health.
Park and recreation services in this area should focus on facilities that
are useful to employees, attractive to employers and add to natural
systems and green infrastructure.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Provide Improved Access and Interpret the Black River Riparian
Forest: As a unique site that provides habitat and floodwater control,
the Black River Riparian Forest 1 has a multi-layered story for
visitors, in addition to being a beautiful and calm place within an
urban environment. Renton should formalize public access to this
site, including trails and an interpretive facility. A boardwalk section of
trail should be considered in site master planning. It will be important
to balance the access and level of habitat and wildlife protection
necessary for this specific site, see concept plan in Chapter 7.
Create an Environmental Education Hub: The combination of unique
natural areas, local and regional trail routes and the King County
Waterworks Garden creates a destination for environmental education
within Renton. The City should develop interpretive elements at key
VALLEY
Projects
• Black River Riparian Forest
• Environmental Education Programs
• Renton Wetlands
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
114 | CITY OF RENTON
CHAPTER FIVE
sites and acquire missing segments via
easement or fee simple acquisition along
the Springbrook Trail corridor and at the
Renton Wetlands 2 . The City could also
contribute to developing curriculum for
visiting school and tour groups to explain
the importance of these natural areas
as habitat and a part of the City’s green
infrastructure.
Add Trails and Seating Areas: The City
should continue to build trail connections
within and connecting to the Valley as
well as continue partnering with King
County and South King County cities to
complete the Lake to Sound Trail 3 . The
Black River segment of this regional trail
under construction in 2019, along with
projects funded by the renewed King
County Parks Levy, will one day complete
a continuous paved pathway from Lake
Washington (in Renton) to the Puget Sound
(in Des Moines). This trail will connect five
cities and multiple existing regional trails,
including the Springbrook Trail, the Cedar
River Trail, the Green River Trail and the
Interurban Trail. Trails in this Community
Planning Area would increase access to
healthy activity to the area’s employment
base. Convenient trails in attractive
settings, such as the existing boardwalk
in the Renton Wetlands, provide walking
opportunities for stress relief and fitness,
while regional trails, bike lanes and freeway
pedestrian connections create active
transportation options for commuters.
Seating areas along trail corridors and
adjacent to natural areas, should be
designed to accommodate outdoor eating
and informal gathering.Talbot Rd SSW 27th St
S 133rd St
SW Grady Way Logan Ave NSW 41st St
S 3rd St
SW 7th St
W Valley HwyFort DentCounty Park
SkywayPark
MetroWaterwork Park
Bryn Mawr Cedar R
iver
§¨¦405
ST716
RentonMunicipalAirport
Black RiverRiparian Forest
Panther CreekWetlands
RentonWetlands
Panther CreekWetlands
Cedar RiverTrail Park
SpringbrookTrail
EarlingtonPark
SpringbrookTrail
Renton
High School
Talbot Hill
Elementary
School
New Horizon
School
St. Anthony's
School
BurnettLinear Park
Lake StreetOpen Space
Piazza & Gateway
Parks Provided by Others
Regional Park
Community Park
Neighborhood Park Linkage
Park Recommendation
Location
Natural Area
Trail Corridor
Special Use
Future Park
#
Valley Planning Area
1
2
3
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 115
RECOMMENDATIONS
Projects
• Earlington Park
• West Hills Neighborhood Park
DESCRIPTION
The West Hill Community Planning Area is located to the west of the
Renton airport and north of Martin Luther King Jr. Way/SW Sunset
Boulevard. The majority of the Planning Area is currently outside of
the city limits. The City of Renton owns one neighborhood park in
West Hill and there are also two King County owned park properties
(one developed park and one natural area site) located in the potential
annexation area. Renton School District extends through West Hill and
five school sites are located in this planning area.
With only a small portion of the Community Planning Area within the
current City limits, the primary focus is serving that area.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Provide One New Neighborhood Park: Within the current city limits,
one additional neighborhood park should be located in West Hill 1 .
The hills and barriers (such as the airport) make it difficult for residents
to access parks within or outside of the Community Planning Area on
foot or by bicycle.
Acquire Waterfront Areas: If the Lake Washington waterfront is
annexed, the City should carefully monitor opportunities to acquire
additional waterfront property for habitat improvement and water
access 2 .
Plan for Annexation Areas: If the City expands into the potential
annexation area, additional park sites will need to be located. Skyway
Park, currently owned by King County, will be an important resource.
Partnership opportunities with the Renton School District could increase
access to recreation whether annexation occurs now or in the future.Park Ave NS 133rd St
NE 4th St
R
e
n
t
o
n
A
v
e
S
Logan Ave NS 3rd St Union Ave NE87th Ave SLake Wa
sh
ing
ton
B
lvd
N
Fort DentCounty Park
SkywayPark
LakeridgePark
Bryn Mawr
LakeWashington
Cedar R
iver
RentonMunicipalAirport
Black RiverRiparian Forest
Gene CoulonMemorial Beach Park
Cedar RiverTrail Park Highlands Park andNeighborhood Center
WindsorHills Park
EarlingtonPark
Sunset NeighborhoodPark
Meadow CrestAccessible Playground
Honey Dew
School
Renton
High School
John Mcknight
Jr High School
Renton Technical
College
Albert Talley
High School
Bryn Mawr
Elementary School
Lakeridge
Elementary School
Campbell Hill
Elementary School
Rainier Hill
Elementary School
Dimmit
Middle School
Highlands
Elem School
Early Childhood
Learning Center
Sartori
Elementary School
Hazen
High School
St. Anthony's
School
CedarRiver Park
LibertyPark
RiverviewPark
JonesPark
Senior ActivityCenter Property
Sit InPark
GlencoePark
BurnettLinear Park
TonkinPark
Piazza & Gateway
Sunset NeighborhoodPark
Parks Provided by Others
Regional Park
Community Park
Neighborhood Park
Linkage
Park Recommendation
Location
Natural Area
Trail Corridor
Special Use
Future Park
#
West Hill
Planning Area
1
2
WEST HILL
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
116 | CITY OF RENTON
CHAPTER FIVE
Talbot Rd SSW 27th St
SE 168th St
SE Petrovitsky Rd
124th Ave SE116th Ave SEPuget Dr SEBenson
D
r
S
SW 41st St
W Valley HwyLake Youngs Watershed
Soos Creek Parkand Trail
Petrovitsky ParkSoos Creek Park and Trail
RentonPark
Soos CreekPark and Trail
McGarvey Park Open Space
Lake YoungsCounty Park
Cavanaugh PondNatural Area
Ricardi ReachNatural Area
BoulevardLane Park
KENT
§¨¦405
§¨¦5
ST716
Ron RegisPark
SpringbrookWatershed
Panther CreekWetlands
RentonWetlands
EdlundProperty
RentonWetlands
CascadePark
Cleveland /Richardson Property
Panther CreekWetlands
TianyPark
ThomasTeasdale Park
SpringbrookTrail
Lindbergh
High School Fairwood
Elementary School
Ridgewood
Elementary School
Northwood
Middle School
Lake Youngs
Elementary School
Carriage Crest
Elementary School
Meeker Middle School
Fred Nelsen
Middle School
Cascade
Elementary
School
Benson Hill
Elementary School
Renton Park
Elementary
Talbot Hill
Elementary
School
Tiany Park
Elementary School
New Horizon
School
ParkwoodSouth Park
SE 186th PlaceProperties
Lake StreetOpen Space
Talbot HillReservoir Park
Parks Provided by Others
Regional Park
Community Park
Neighborhood Park
Linkage
Park Recommendation
Location
Natural Area
Trail Corridor
Special Use
Future Park
#
Fairwood Planning Area
DESCRIPTION
The Fairwood Community Planning Area is located east of the
current city limits, south of State Route 169, and borders the Lake
Youngs Watershed on three sides. This Potential Annexation Area,
if annexed, would become the south east corner of Renton. This
area is largely developed with single family homes and contains a
commercial center, with higher density multi-family housing centered
at SE Petrovitsky Road and 140th Avenue SE. The City of Renton owns
no parks in this Community Planning Area, but King County owns and
manages the large sports field-focused Petrovitsky Park at Parkside
Way and Petrovitsky Road.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Note: This entire area is outside of the city limits, no projects are
planned pending any future annexation.
Plan for Annexation Areas: If the City expands into the potential
annexation area, additional park sites will need to be located,
including neighborhood parks and a community park. As with other
areas in the City, partnerships with the Renton and Kent School
Districts will be important to providing park and recreation services
to this area.
Connections: The majority of the connections within this Community
Planning Area will be on-street bike routes and sidewalks. Future
planning for this area should take advantage of the existing trail on
Petrovitsky Road and large publicly owned natural areas along Soos
Creek and Lake Youngs with associated trails.
FAIRWOOD
Projects
• No projects identified
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
6
IMPLEMENTATION
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
118 | CITY OF RENTON
IMPLEMENTATION
Implementing this Plan advances the community-wide vision and guides long-
term decision making. The critical balance is to provide enough direction
to create action toward the community’s vision while retaining a high
degree of flexibility to adapt to opportunities created by development and
redevelopment, changes in priorities, new partnerships and the availability of
outside resources.
DECISION MAKING TOOLS
The goals of this Plan offer direction for long-term change in the park system. The objectives provide
additional clarity by describing the outcomes of these changes. Clear connection to the goals and objectives
ensures that future development will be consistent with the desires of the community. The decision making
tools further the community wide vision, goals and objectives by providing guidance for the provision of
parks and recreation services and programming, the design of new parks and renovations, the prioritization
of projects and the cost of building and maintaining improvements. This section explains these tools and
how they can be applied to Renton’s future projects and opportunities.
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 119
Design Guidelines
This Plan recommends design guidelines for the park classification system and updates and expands the
descriptions of what should, what could and what should not be included in the design and development of
each park type. This tool also informs decision making about size and locations for future parks.
ORGANIZATION
The guidelines are organized by park classification. For each park classification, there are five design
guidelines topics:
• Size and Access: The size of a park, and particularly the developable area, determines the
type of park and uses possible at the site. Access addresses the frontages, preferred modes of
transportation and entrances to the site.
• Recommended Resources: There is a minimum set of park resources needed for a park location
to meet the objectives developed from community input and analyzed in the Community Needs
Assessment. Items listed in this sub-heading are intended to be the minimum elements for the given
park classification.
• Additional Potential Resources: The park resources identified in this sub-heading are additional
resources for consideration. If site size allows, other resources can be incorporated into the park as
long as the impacts of the resource do not exceed the capacity of the size and scale of the intended
park site classification.
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
120 | CITY OF RENTON
CHAPTER SIX
• Structures: If a structure is identified for the park site,
additional review and standards will come into play. This
section also calls out which non-recreation structures need
additional consideration before being located within park
sites.
• Incompatible Resources: In some cases, there are park
resources that conflict with the purpose and character of a
particular park classification.
The basic guidelines, by park category are provided below, the
remaining guideline topics are detailed in Appendix B: Decision
Making Tools.
NEIGHBORHOOD PARK
Intent: Provide close-to-home recreation opportunities for nearby
residents, who typically live within walking and bicycling distance
(.25-.5 miles) of the park in a residential setting.
Size and Access:
• Minimum developable park size 2 acres.
• Property faces front facades of adjacent development.
• Access from local street or trail.
COMMUNITY PARK
Intent: Provide opportunities for active recreation and organized play
in a location that can accommodate increased traffic and demand,
while also serving the neighborhood park function for nearby
residents.
Size and Access:
• Minimum developable park size 10 acres.
• Access from a higher order public street on at least one side
for main park entry.
• Main park entry should front a street with transit or bicycle
route when applicable.
• Secondary access to the park from a public local access street
or trail preferred.
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 121
IMPLEMENTATION
REGIONAL PARKS
Intent: Provide destination park locations that can accommodate
communitywide and regional demand, while also fulfilling the
function of a community and neighborhood park for nearby
residents.
Size and Access:
• Minimum developable park size 50 acres.
• Access from a higher order public street on at least one side
for main park entry.
• Park may have multiple main entries which should front a
street with a transit or bicycle route when possible.
• Secondary access points to the park from a public local access
street or trail is encouraged.
SPECIAL USE PARKS
Intent: Provide space for unique features or places that create variety
in the park system but cannot be accommodated within other park
sites due to size or location requirements.
Size and Access:
• Size depends on the type of use proposed.
• Access from a higher order public street on at least one side
for main park entry.
• Main park entry should front a street with a transit or bicycle
route when applicable.
• Access may be limited during certain times of the day or to
specific recreation activities.
NATURAL AREAS
Intent: Provide opportunities for users to interact with local nature
or protect natural resources and systems within the standards of the
existing natural resource regulatory environment.
Size and Access:
• Size of the natural area is variable, depending primarily on
the extent of the natural resource being protected.
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
122 | CITY OF RENTON
CHAPTER SIX
• Access is dependent on size of property and type of natural
area. Generally, natural areas should have at least one
identified entrance accessible from a public street.
• Public access may be limited or excluded if the natural
resource is deemed too fragile for interaction. However,
maintenance access should be provided via trail or service
road.
CORRIDOR
Intent: Narrow swaths of land that serve as connections between
parks or to other destinations. Lands can include public land, private
partnerships and/or easements. A corridor site can be the location of
a trail or can provide a habitat linkage between two larger areas.
Size and Access:
• Size is dependent on corridor length and right-of-way or
easement width and connectivity.
Natural Area Evaluation Tool
This tool utilizes a systematic approach to prioritizing and
managing natural areas, beginning with inventories and moving
into stabilization, at which point the natural area is no longer
deteriorating, and then improvement, and gradually, restoration.
The inventory feeds a decision-making process guided by
prioritization criteria to help the City decide which natural areas to
focus on first. See Appendix B for more information.
MAINTAINRESTOREIMPROVESTABILIZE
Figure 6.1: Natural Area Management Continuum
Increasing Habitat Quality
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 123
IMPLEMENTATION
Prioritization Criteria
The wide range of projects, from new STEM programs to a new play
feature to natural area enhancement, require criteria to evaluate how
a specific program or project relates to the Plan vision. Drawing from
the extensive public input, the project team developed and refined
seven criteria to apply to parks, recreation programming and natural
area projects:
• Advance programming objectives: Project or program
supports recreation programming key outcomes.
• Provide multiple planning objectives: Project or program
is aligned with other adopted planning efforts of the City of
Renton, King County or other aligned jurisdictions.
• Fill identified gaps in service: Project or program adds park
sites, recreation facilities, natural areas or recreation programs
to identified underserved populations or areas of the city.
• Enhance partnerships or volunteerism: Project or program
creates new partnerships or strengthens existing partnerships.
• Enhance (or improves use of) existing facilities: Project
or program makes the best possible use of the existing
investments in land and facilities.
• Contribute to system sustainability: Project or program
contributes to the long-term environmental and financial
sustainability of the system.
• Strengthen identity: Project or program celebrates the unique
features of Renton’s neighborhoods or the city as a whole.
Scoring a project against these criteria allows for the sorting of
disparate projects into an ordered list that focuses community
resources. As part of the planning process, the consultant team scored
each project against each criterion, on a scale of 0-5. This preliminary
list was then reviewed by staff, the public, commissions and the
City Council’s Committee of the Whole. The list was finalized once
all public feedback was received as part of the SEPA environmental
review process. This ranking should be considered a snapshot view of
priorities. As time passes, this list should not be considered fixed. The
factors that feed into prioritizing based on these criteria are subject
to change and should be reconsidered periodically. Additionally, while
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
124 | CITY OF RENTON
CHAPTER SIX
this ranking can be used to look at all projects in the system, it can
also be broken down to examine the ranking by park type, Community
Planning Area or by specific types of improvements. Please see
Appendix B for the full descriptions of each of the Prioritization
Criteria.
Capital and Operations Cost Model
The Prioritization Criteria intentionally avoids making decisions based
on cost. However, the cost of improvements at a park (and at the
system-wide level) is an important consideration as the Plan moves
from this decision making stage into implementation planning. Critical
cost considerations include both one-time capital costs and on-going
operations and maintenance costs.
The Capital and Operations Cost Model allows broad “planning level”
costs to be identified based on the recommended improvements.
These costs are based on a series of assumptions based on recent
park construction and operations experience of the project team as
well as past project and operating costs in Renton. Six major project
categories are identified in the model, along with a number of
specific facilities, each of which has specific capital or operating cost
implications. For each park in the system, the recommended projects
and individual facilities are selected and added to the total project
cost based on a per-unit or per-acre cost assumption specific to the
type of park.
The result is a total capital cost by park location, which can be rolled
up to a park type, Community Planning Area or system-wide total.
One additional function added to the model is an inflation factor that
illustrates the capital cost projected 5, 10 and 20 years into the future,
illustrating the value of completing projects sooner rather than later.
Operating cost modeling includes the resources needed to maintain,
staff and program park sites and facilities. These costs are driven
by the size of a park site and the presence of key facilities, such as
restrooms, sport fields and buildings. Operating costs are calculated
for the existing park system as well as the facilities recommended to
be added to the system. The final total (including both existing and
proposed) removes the duplication of facilities that would be replaced
by a recommended improvement, to avoid double counting.
The model is both a snapshot of the total costs based on the
recommended improvements, and a live spreadsheet model that
SIX CAPITAL PROJECT TYPES:
• Planning and
Design
• Acquisition
• Development
• Renovation
• Stewardship
Projects
• Major Maintenance
and Reinvestment
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 125
IMPLEMENTATION
allows staff to change the assumptions about cost and specific
facilities to adjust for changes over time. This flexibility allows the
City to model different packages of projects that result in more,
less or simply different investments in the park system. The totals
reported from this tool are based on all the recommendations in the
Plan and are summarized following the Capital Projects List.
CAPITAL PROJECTS LIST
Table 6.1 presents a ranked list of all capital improvements
recommended in the Plan. The Capital Projects List ranking utilizes
the prioritization criteria and process described in Appendix B to
apply public priorities to the wide range of potential projects. This
scoring was based on community demand and needs, achieving
the vision of this Plan and was completed prior to the development
of project costs and funding options, which are applied later. The
list includes the project title, defining the specific site or type of
improvement; a project description summarizing the full extent of
the project over the 20-year Plan vision; and the total score out of 35
possible points, with a higher score meaning a higher priority. Where
projects have the same score, they are sorted in alphabetical order
within the list position (for example, all projects scoring 27 points
are in list position number four but there is no implied preference
for Highlands Park and Neighborhood Center as it falls alphabetically
before May Creek Park).
Use of this List
The Capital Projects List as presented on the following pages should
be considered a snapshot of prioritization based on 2019 conditions.
As a 20-year plan, the implementation of these projects will be
spread out over many years and this ranking will help to focus
City efforts. Breaking down this list by timeframe, the top ten list
positions (which include 24 projects) are the focus of the first six-
years of Plan implementation. The projects following position 10 will
be considered long-term efforts but should be considered even in
the short-term if special opportunities arise. This list is intended to
be used as a dynamic tool. The total ranking will always need to be
considered against practical realities and be reevaluated periodically
to account for changing circumstances and conditions. In addition,
the list can be filtered and sorted to identify priority order based on
park category or Community Planning Area, as shown in Appendix C.
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
126 | CITY OF RENTON
CHAPTER SIX
Table 6.1: Ranked Project List
PRIORITY #PROJECT PROJECT DESCRIPTION TOTAL SCORE
1 N.A.R.CO
Property
Develop according to design guidelines and Riverside: Tri Park
Concept Plan to include artificial turf soccer fields, relocated trail,
parking, picnic facilities, play area, restrooms, bike park/bmx/
pump track and climbing wall. Park included in the Shoreline
Master Program, WRIA 8 and the Cedar River Basin Plan. Capital
improvements and major maintenance as needed.
33
2 Cedar River
Park
Existing major building facilities include RCC and Carco Theatre.
Enclose lap pool at Henry Moses Aquatic Center, potential field
reconfiguration. Redevelop elements as shown on the revised
Riverside: Tri Park Concept Plan. Capital improvements and major
maintenance as needed. Also included in the Shoreline Master
Program, WRIA 8 and the Cedar River Basin Plan.
29
3 May Creek
Greenway
Complete site inventory and management plan, acquire additional
land along creek corridor, install soft surface trail, trailhead(s),
creek crossings and partner with Newcastle and King County.
Included in the Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8 and the May
Creek Basin Plan.
28
4
Highlands
Park and
Neighborhood
Center
Re-develop according to design guidelines using concept plan
as a reference. Existing property is inefficient as configured.
Located within the larger Sunset Planned Action EIS area. Capital
improvements and major maintenance as needed.
27
4 May Creek Park
Develop park according to design guidelines (parking, picnic,
play area, hard surface court, open turf area, restrooms, trail
connections) using concept plan as a reference, create/implement
management plan addressing wetlands. Potential acquisition to
increase park usability.
27
4 Sam Chastain
Waterfront Trail
Construct the planned waterfront trail and park area, connecting
the end of the existing water walk at the Cedar River Boathouse to
the existing paved path at the south end of Gene Coulon Memorial
Beach Park.
27
5 Black River
Riparian Forest
Develop according to design guidelines using concept plan as a
reference, complete site inventory/management plan, implement
management plan. Location of Lake to Sound Trail constructed and
maintained by King County (shown as regional trail connection on
the concept plan). Site is in the Shoreline Master Program, WRIA
9, Green/Duwamish Watershed Management Plan and the Black
River Water Quality Management Plan.
26
The Capital Projects List, and the prioritization tool that informed it,
is intended to feed into the City’s Capital Improvement Plan process.
Through the City’s CIP process, funding sources, amounts and
phasing will be identified for the public’s priority projects as the next
step towards implementation.
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 127
IMPLEMENTATION
PRIORITY #PROJECT PROJECT DESCRIPTION TOTAL SCORE
5
Gene Coulon
Memorial
Beach Park
Maintain and enhance facility for non-motorized boating, acquire
land for additional parking, expand technology, renovate S.
beach restrooms & bathhouse. Replace parking lots, irrigation,
swim beach promenade and rosewall/bulkhead. High level of
ongoing reinvestment due to intensive use. Planned park bond
improvements include multiple major replacement projects.
Included in the City Center Plan, Shoreline Master Program and
WRIA 8, Eastrail is located adjacent to the East park boundary.
Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.
26
5 Liberty Park
Re-develop according to design standards and the Riverside:
Tri-Park Concept Plan. Improve ballfields in the short term
(for example levelling). Repurpose Community Building for
environmental learning. Included in the City Center Plan, Shoreline
Master Program, WRIA 8 and the Cedar River Basin Plan. Capital
improvements and major maintenance as needed.
26
5
Piazza, Gateway
and former Big
5 site
Re-master plan for future park development. Redevelopment of
the Piazza Gateway park site and former Big 5 lot should include a
plaza and other complementary outdoor spaces allowing activities
to extend beyond the existing park, creating a civic center. Capital
improvements and major maintenance as needed. Included in the
City Center Plan and the Downtown Civic Core Vision and Action
Plan.
26
5 Ron Regis Park
Improve existing and undeveloped fields (with natural turf); extend
water service to the park; add a permanent restroom, playground,
and picnic area(s). Park included in the Shoreline Master Program,
WRIA 8 and the Cedar River Basin Plan. Potential for habitat
improvements to stabilize shoreline. Capital improvements and
major maintenance as needed.
26
6 Cedar River
Natural Area
Complete site inventory and management plan, implement
management plan. Included in the Shoreline Master Program,
WRIA 8, Cedar River Basin Plan. Continue to acquire properties as
they become available.
25
6
Cleveland
Richardson
Property
Develop park according to design guidelines using concept plan as
a reference, create and implement management plan. 25
6
North
Highlands
Park and
Neighborhood
Center
Re-master plan park and redevelop neighborhood building for
multi-generational use. Potential for partnerships. Located within
the larger Sunset Planned Action EIS area. Capital improvements
and major maintenance as needed.
25
6 Tiffany Park
Renovate according to design guidelines using concept plan
as a reference. Expand to connect to Cascade Park. Potentially
repurpose and expand neighborhood building for environmental
learning as shown on concept plan. Capital improvements and
major maintenance as needed.
25
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
128 | CITY OF RENTON
CHAPTER SIX
PRIORITY #PROJECT PROJECT DESCRIPTION TOTAL SCORE
7 Edlund
Property
Develop park according to design guidelines using concept plan as
a reference, create and implement management plan addressing
wetland. Continue acquistions to make connection to the Panther
Creek Wetland.
24
7 Kenyon Dobson
Park
Develop interpretive/education center, trailhead, parking,
restrooms.24
8 Burnett Linear
Park*
Included in the Renton Downtown Civic Core Vision and Action
Plan and the City Center Plan. Improvements identify expanding
park to the north (Renton Connector). Reconfigure existing
parking lot between 4th and 5th. Capital improvements and major
maintenance as needed.
23
8 Honey Creek
Greenway
Complete site inventory and management plan, implement
management plan. Develop soft surface trail. Located in the
Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8 and the May Creek Basin Plan.
Continue to acquire properties as they become available.
23
8 Trail Expansion
& Development
Trail connection projects from the Trails and Bicycle Master Plan
that are connected to parks and natural areas.23
9 Boeing EIS
Waterfront Park
A new park with lakefront access as noted in the Boeing
Comprehensive Plan Amendment EIS dated 10/21/03.22
9 Sports Complex Acquire, plan and develop a 4 field (or more) sports complex to
centralize competitive play.22
10 Cedar River
Trail Park
Invasive species removal, add utilities for Cedar River Boathouse.
Included in City Center Plan, Shoreline Master Program, WRIA
8 and the Cedar River Basin Plan. Planned connection to future
Sam Chastain Waterfront Trail. Capital improvements and major
maintenance as needed.
21
10
Panther
Creek/Edlund
Property
Included in Edlund Property concept plan. Develop a management
plan. Acquire land and easements as needed to connect to the
Panther Creek Wetlands.
21
11 Panther Creek
Wetlands
Complete site inventory and management plan, acquire additional
land along creek corridor. Create pedestrian trails and boardwalk
system. Managed by Surface Water Utility.
20
11 Philip Arnold
Park
Potential partnership with neighboring landowner (currently Puget
Sound Energy) to enhance usability and access. Improve ballfield
and multipurpose field. Renovate or remove neighborhood
building and restrooms. Included in the City Center Plan. Planned
park bond improvements include: relocate playground, improve
ADA accessibility, refurbish picnic areas, refurbish basketball
court surround, refurbish parking lot, add lighting and a loop trail.
Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.
20
11 Senior Activity
Center Property
Potentially expand for multi-generational center. Included in the
City Center Plan, Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8 and the Cedar
River Basin Plan. Capital improvements and major maintenance as
needed.
20
Table 6.1: Ranked Project List (continued)
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 129
IMPLEMENTATION
PRIORITY #PROJECT PROJECT DESCRIPTION TOTAL SCORE
11 Corridor
Acquisition
Acquire or secure new properties providing important linkages
between parks and natural areas. Included in the City Center Plan
and the Trails and Bicycle Master Plan.
20
11 Trailheads and
Parking Identify and develop appropriate access points to natural areas.20
12
City Center
Neighborhood
Park 1
Develop neighborhood park amenities at existing Senior Activity
Center site after phasing out existing maintenance buildings, which
will require acquisition of a new site. Included in the City Center
Plan, Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8 and the Cedar River Basin
Plan.
19
12 Jones Park
Shoreline stabilization. Capital improvements and major
maintenance as needed. Included in the City Center Plan and
Downtown Civic Core Vision and Action Plan. Adjacent trail
corridor adds enough size to serve as a full neighborhood park.
Park in the Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8 and Cedar River
Basin Plan.
19
12 Kiwanis Park
Potential acquisition to expand park to increase usability. Bond
improvements include: improving field and installing ADA access
from Union Avenue, renovating or removing neighborhood
building, replacing playground and renovating hard surface courts
and parking, and adding picnic plaza. Capital improvements and
major maintenance as needed.
19
12
Sunset
Neighborhood
Park
Final phase contruction to be completed in 2020. Capital
improvements and major maintenance as needed.19
12 Thomas
Teasdale Park
Improve outfield drainage. Potential re-purpose of neighborhood
building. Renovate existing ballfield to create all-abilities ballfield.
Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.
19
13 Renton
Wetlands
Continue to manage as required by Mitigation Banking
Agreements. Portion managed by Surface Water Utility. Included
in the Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 9, Green/Duwamish
Watershed Plan.
18
14
East Plateau
Community
Park
Acquire site from King County and re-develop according to
design guidelines using concept plan as a reference. Capital
improvements and major maintenance as needed.
17
14 Kennydale Lions
Park
Renovate according to design guidelines using concept plan as
a reference. Park acreage is not fully developed and current
configuration of facilities limits usage. Renovate existing
neighborhood building. Capital improvements and major
maintenance as needed.
17
14 Non-motorized
Boating Facility
Acquire land, develop and/or develop partnerships for a non-
motorized boating facility. Enhance existing non-motorized boating
facility.
17
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
130 | CITY OF RENTON
CHAPTER SIX
PRIORITY #PROJECT PROJECT DESCRIPTION TOTAL SCORE
15
Parkwood
South Div #3
Park*
Acquire adjacent land to bring this site up to minimum size
of 2 acres of developable land; master plan and develop a
neighborhood park according to design guidelines.
16
15 Community
Gardens
Acquire land and/or develop additional community gardens
through partnerships, potentially as part of new neighborhood or
community parks.
16
16 Cascade Park
Renovate according to design guildelines using the concept plan as
a reference. Expand park to connect Cascade Park to Tiffany Park,
improve road access and increase visibility. Potential for off leash
area within park. Capital improvements and major maintenance as
needed.
15
16 Earlington
Park*Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.15
16 Kennydale
Beach Park*
Reconfigure dock for improved life guarding, renovate restroom/
lifeguard facility. Acquire land to enhance usability. Park included
in the Shoreline Master Program and WRIA 8, Eastrail is located
adjacent to the East park boundary. Capital improvements and
major maintenance as needed.
15
16
Wayfinding and
Informational
Signage
Design and implement wayfinding and park signage throughout
the parks, recreation and natural areas system and install
information kiosks and trailhead signage at key points in the trail
system.
15
17 Maplewood
Golf Course
Continue to maintain and operate, acquire property as it becomes
available. See adopted Master Plan, included in the Shoreline
Master Program, WRIA 8, and the Cedar River Basin Plan. Capital
and operations costs are outside of the Community Services
budget, within an enterprise fund. Capital Improvements and
major maintenance as needed.
14
17 SE 186th Place
Properties*
Undersized and surrounded by private property; potential for
community garden, tree nursery or play area to serve local
residents. If not used for neighborhood park functions, replace
with an additional park east of SR 515.
14
17
"Soos Creek
Greenway:
Boulevard
Lane"
A portion of the King County owned Soos Creek Greenway, within
the Renton City Limits. This neighborhood park may be transferred
to the City and renovated. This park includes a substantial natural
area.
14
17 Talbot Hill
Reservoir Park
Renovate site with features that differentiate it from nearby
Thomas Teasedale Park. Potentially add loop walk and picnic area.
Refurbish tennis and pickleball courts. Capital improvements and
major maintenance as needed.
14
17 Windsor Hills
Park
Potential acquisitions to enhance park usability and visibility from
street. Redevelop according to design guideline and concept plan.
Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.
14
Table 6.1: Ranked Project List (continued)
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 131
IMPLEMENTATION
PRIORITY #PROJECT PROJECT DESCRIPTION TOTAL SCORE
17
Benson
Neighborhood
Park 1
Acquire and develop one neighborhood park east of S Benson Rd
and north of SE Puget Drive.14
17
Benson
Neighborhood
Park 2
Acquire and develop one neighborhood park west of SR 515
around SE 192nd Street.14
18
East Plateau
Neighborhood
Park 1
Acquire and develop a neighborhood park south of Sunset
Boulevard and east of Duvall.13
18
East Plateau
Neighborhood
Park 2
Acquire and develop a neighborhood park north of SE 128th
Street.13
18
Highlands
Neighborhood
Park 1
Acquire and develop a neighborhood park north of Sunset
Boulevard, west of Duvall.13
18
Highlands
Neighborhood
Park 2
Acquire and develop a neighborhood park south of NE 3rd Street.13
18
Kennydale
Neighborhood
Park 1
Acquire and develop a neighborhood park west of I-405.13
18
Kennydale
Neighborhood
Park 2
Acquire and develop a neighborhood park east of I-405 and north
of the May Creek Greenway.13
18
West Hills
Neighborhood
Park
Acquire and develop one neighborhood park north of Renton
Avenue.13
18 Cedar River
Trail Corridor
Secure ownership of remaining railbanked corridor land between
the trestle bridge and Ron Regis Park, also the remaining corridor
near I-405, include acquired land in the surrounding parks and
natural areas; maintain corridor as a regional trail linkage.
13
18
Community
Garden/
Greenhouse
Continue to maintain and operate, expand garden. Potential to be
larger neighborhood Park - Planning and acquisition included in
City Center Neighborhood Park 1. Included in the City Center Plan,
Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8, and the Cedar River Basin Plan.
13
18 Dog Parks Acquire land, develop and/or develop partnerships for off-leash
areas in four neighborhood or community parks or other locations.13
19
Soos Creek
Greenway:
Renton Park
A portion of the King County owned Soos Creek Greenway, within
the Renton City Limits. This property may be transferred to the
City once Soos Creek Trail is complete.
12
20 Riverview Park
Park in Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8 and the Cedar River
Basin Plan. Capital improvements and major maintenance as
needed.
11
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
132 | CITY OF RENTON
CHAPTER SIX
PRIORITY #PROJECT PROJECT DESCRIPTION TOTAL SCORE
21 Lake Street
Open Space
Potential trailhead. Acquire easements as neccesary to connect to
Panther Creek Wetlands.10
21 Tonkin Park
Redevelop per Downtown Civic Core Vision and Action Plan.
Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. Included
in the City Center Plan.
10
22 Skate Parks Develop new skate park within a community park.9
23 Maplewood
Park
Renovate or remove restrooms. Capital improvements and major
maintenance as needed.8
23 Veterans
Memorial Park
Tile refurbishment. Capital improvements and major maintenance
as needed. Included in the City Center Plan.8
24 Glencoe Park*Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.7
24 Heritage Park Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.7
24 Maplewood
Roadside Park
Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. Included
in the Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8 and the Cedar River
Basin Plan.
7
25 Springbrook
Watershed
Managed by Water Utility, not accessible to the public. Capital and
operations costs are outside of Community Services budget.6
26 Sit In Park Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.
Included in the City Center Plan. Included in Downtown Civic Core.3
Summary of Capital Costs
Each new or existing project park site has a set of recommended
projects and may include specific facilities recommendations. The
details of these recommendations are provided in Appendix C
along with the capital costs per project. The total amount of capital
investment identified in the cost model is $333,092,000. Table 6.2 on
the following page breaks this total down by major project type and
additional facilities with percentages of the total cost.
Table 6.1: Ranked Project List (continued)
* Parks that have been provisionally classified even though they do not meet minimum size or other design guidelines.
** Boeing EIS Waterfront Park development would only occur if the Boeing Company surplused the Renton facilities.
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 133
IMPLEMENTATION
Table 6.2: Capital Cost Summary - Total Costs for All Projects Broken Down by Category
MAJOR PROJECT TYPE TOTAL COST % OF TOTAL COST
Planning and Design $13,800,000 4%
Acquisition $41,319,000 12%
Development $84,951,000 26%
Renovation $16,851,000 5%
Stewardship Projects $3,402,000 1%
Major Maintenance and Reinvestment $28,861,000 9%
SUBTOTAL: CAPITAL PROJECT TYPES $189,184,000 57%
Additional Facilities and Permitting - Total Costs for All Projects in Each Category
Play Area - Small $8,750,000 3%
Play Area - Large $3,000,000 1%
Picnic Shelter - Small $4,375,000 1%
Picnic Shelter - Large $1,500,000 0%
Multi-Purpose Trails (Miles) $25,700,000 8%
Soft-Surface Trails (Miles) $510,000 0%
Multi Purpose Sport Field $8,500,000 3%
Sport Field with Artificial Turf/Lights $24,000,000 7%
Sport Courts $2,475,000 1%
Restroom $15,000,000 5%
New Building $6,000,000 2%
Other Major Capital $42,480,000 13%
Environmental and Permitting Costs $1,610,000 0%
SUBTOTAL: ADDITIONAL FACILITIES AND PERMITTING $143,900,000 43%
TOTAL CAPITAL COST $333,092,000 100%
Note: See Appendix C for details.
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
134 | CITY OF RENTON
CHAPTER SIX
INFLATION OF COSTS
The projected inflation of the total capital cost is based on a
5% annual inflation factor. Over the long-term, the costs of the
recommended investment in the park system will increase greatly.
Table 6.3, below, shows the projected cost for five, ten and twenty
years in the future.
In twenty years, the cost of developing the improvements
recommended here would more than double. Appendix C includes
further breakdown of these numbers by project.
Summary of Operations Costs
Operations costs are modeled on a per acre basic maintenance cost
that is based on Renton’s actual costs of providing maintenance,
equipment, supplies and support services. In addition, facilities that
require additional maintenance or staffing such as sports fields,
include operating cost allocations on a per unit (bonus) basis. For
recreation buildings, staffing, facilities support and utility costs are
included. Special facilities, such as the Henry Moses Aquatic Center
and recreation staffing at swimming beaches and the Henry Moses
Aquatic Center were added to the total as Other Operations costs.
Table 6.3: Inflation Projections
TOTAL CAPITAL COST 2019 $333,092,000
TOTAL CAPITAL COST PROJECTION 5 YEARS $446,372,000
TOTAL CAPITAL COST PROJECTION 10 YEARS $542,574,000
TOTAL CAPITAL COST PROJECTION 20 YEARS $883,796,000
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 135
IMPLEMENTATION
PROGRAM PROJECTS LIST
In addition to the capital projects, a series of program areas were
identified for exploration and growth. These program projects
have been separated from the capital projects due to the different
funding needs and implementation process. These projects are not
an exhaustive list of ongoing Renton recreation programs, but rather
areas that received special interest from the community and should
be a focus of development.
It is important to note that recreation programming and park
and recreation facilities are closely tied together. As facilities are
developed or redeveloped, new or additional programs should be
evaluated to maximize their use. The program recommendations do
not have associated costs, as the scale of programming and the cost
recovery goals are yet to be developed. These details will be clarified
as the Recreation and Neighborhoods Strategic and Operational Plan
and Cost Recovery Model are completed.
Table 6.4: Operating Cost Summary - Totals for Each Category
OPERATING TYPE EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL (EXISTING AND PROPOSED)
Basic Maintenance $3,862,909 $2,531,931 $6,394,800
Bonus: Sports Fields $400,000 $625,000 $1,025,000
Bonus: Restrooms $945,000 $735,000 $1,680,000
Bonus: Picnic Shelter $60,000 $125,000 $185,000
Staffing: Building $6,675,000 $1,800,000 $8,475,000
Other Operations $2,113,000 $1,010,000 $3,123,000
Total Annual Operating Cost (2019 Dollars) $14,056,300 $6,827,100 $20,883,400
Note: Operating costs adjusted to avoid double counting replaced facilities; the difference between individual lines and
totals is acocunted for in rounding error.
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
136 | CITY OF RENTON
CHAPTER SIX
Table 6.5: Program Project List
PRIORITY #PROJECT PROJECT DESCRIPTION TOTAL SCORE
1 Environmental
Education
Expand hands-on environmental programs that focus
on the natural resources found in the Renton park
system and cultural history.32
1
Recreation and
Neighborhoods
Strategic Plan and
Cost Recovery
Model
Develop detailed Recreation and Neighborhoods
Strategic and Operational Plan as an operational guide
to implement this plan and the City Business Plan.32
2 Neighborhood
Program
Build community in neighborhoods by supporting
neighborhood group identified events and projects;
residents contribute hours to enhance and restore
their neighborhoods.
31
3 Aquatics and Water
Access
Maximize use of existing facilities to meet demand
for year-round pool access. Provide the physical and
programmatic framework to facilitate community
members accessing Lake Washington and the Cedar
River independently or through programming.
29
4 Renton School
District Partnership
Share resources and indoor and outdoor spaces.
Partnering to provide programming beyond what the
city and school district can provide independently
of one another (i.e. STEM). Data sharing to be sure
programming objectives are achieved and responsive
to community needs.
28
4 STEM Programming
Expand programming to meet community demand
for Science, Technology, Engineering and Math
educational opportunities, in partnership with the
school district and technical college to meet a key
community need.
28
5 Athletics
Maxmize use of existing facilities through partnerships
and shared use and maintenance; year-round facilities
and playable fields to keep pace with demand.27
6 Arts
Place-based community art, for all ages and abilities,
building community through arts-based learning and
play with a focus on history and culture in partnership
with the Arts Commission. Includes arts based events,
community art projects, and opportunities to integrate
art into neighborhoods, community events and
facilities.
26
Note: Programming and Facilities are reciprocal; as new facilities are constructed new programming should be developed.
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 137
IMPLEMENTATION
IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES
There are several strategies that can move the community vision
forward. Two of the most critical paths to success are ensuring
that new development contributes a fair share to park system
improvements and pursuing a strategy to build community support
for future initiatives. Park related projects that combine with other
public services such as transportation and stormwater, may be able
to utilize alternative sources of funding and maximize community
benefits. Additionally, leveraging recreation programming as a
community building strategy can extend additional support for the
City’s offerings:
• Development/Redevelopment Partnerships: Efforts to build
the envisioned park system will require substantial financial
investment. While tax payers will ultimately share in some
of these costs, private development should be responsible
for contributing toward the related increased impacts on the
parks and recreation system. The City should rely on a system
of regulations and rewards that ensure new development
and redevelopment pays a portion of public improvements.
Feedback about recreation elements and access as well as
education about the financial benefits to developer projects
(especially increased property values) can increase the overall
contribution individual projects make to the system.
• Building Community Support: All new mechanisms to fund
public improvements will require the will of voters. It will be
important to employ public input, education, outreach and
polling before any specific funding mechanism is attempted.
• Integrating Parks, Natural Areas and Infrastructure:
Combining the community benefits of infrastructure
Eighty-five percent of
respondents to the
2017 NRPA Americans’
Engagement with
Parks Survey seek
high-quality park and
recreation amenities
when they are choosing
a place to live. Higher
home values not only
benefit the owners of
these properties but
also add to the tax base
of local governments.
Source: Centers for
Disease Control
and Prevention and
National Park Service.
Parks, Trails, and
Health Workbook.
Washington, DC:
National Park Service;
2015.
PRIORITY #PROJECT PROJECT DESCRIPTION TOTAL SCORE
6 Adaptive Recreation Provide programming for youth and adults with
adaptive emotional, physical and sensory needs.26
7 Outdoor Recreation
Providing physical and programmatic framework to
facilitate community members to engage with the
parks system independently or through programming. 22
Note: Programming and Facilities are reciprocal; as new facilities are constructed new programming should be developed.
Table 6.5: Program Project List (continued)
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
138 | CITY OF RENTON
CHAPTER SIX
investment with the recreational benefits of park land
has considerable potential to enhance the use of natural
systems in Renton as well as meeting the Plan goals. The
desired result of this integration is reducing the amount of
land reserved for the exclusive use of infrastructure and
maximizing recreational value. In an environment of limited
public resources (including land and operating funding)
the City and the community should explore integrating
compatible infrastructure into parks and using infrastructure
land for park and natural area purposes. The design
guidelines provided in Appendix B include considerations
for both infrastructure additions to park and natural area
sites and the addition of park and natural features to
infrastructure sites. One of the opportunities presented by
combining sites and functions is the potential for stormwater
fees to help fund enhancements that provide multiple
benefits and natural area management.
• Recreation Program Positioning: The Recreation Division has
built an extensive set of program offerings and developed
an informative guide to both City operated and partner
programs. Renton should continue to build on this to ensure
that the Let’s Go Renton brochure is the “go to” guide for all
events occurring in Renton. One of the things that Renton can
offer to potential programming partners is the opportunity
for inexpensive exposure. Each major program area should be
discussed as an investment in the community, directly related
to the City’s goals. Parks, recreation programming, trails
and natural areas provide opportunities for physical activity
resulting in the long term investment in public health.
• Building School District Partnership: The City has a long
working relationship with the Renton School District that
has allowed City recreation and community organizations
to use indoor and outdoor facilities. The City has a
unique opportunity to revisit the structure of the existing
partnership. Potential changes could enhance the public’s
access to sport fields, indoor spaces, gyms and classrooms.
For Meadow Crest
Accessible Playground,
25% of total project
costs were derived
from Community
Contributions.
Significant funding
partners included
Rotary Club of
Renton, First Financial
Northwest Foundation,
Renton Community
Foundation, Seattle
Seahawks, King County,
Renton Housing
Authority, Renton
Technical College,
Lions Club, Kiwanis
Club, Soroptimist and
multiple personal
donations.
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 139
IMPLEMENTATION
FUNDING STRATEGIES
Current and Recent Funding Sources
GENERAL FUND
This is the City’s primary source for operating revenue. Most of
this revenue comes from taxes levied on property, the sale of
merchandise and utilities within the City’s boundary. Fees collected
through the park and recreation system, such as recreation program
fees, boat launch fees, picnic shelter or other facilities rental fees,
are also returned to the general fund. These revenues are generally
thought to return to the Community Services budget. In practice the
revenue number is a point of justification of the annual budget and
has no direct connection to the level of funding.
REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX (REET)
Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) is a tax on all real estate sales and is
levied against the full value of the property. The City is allowed under
the statutes to levy 0.5% in addition to the State of Washington tax.
These funds can only be used for projects identified in the Capital
Facilities Plan Element of the City’s Comprehensive Plan. The City
projects approximately $4 million per year in REET revenues. These
funds are used for general obligation debt, parks and facilities capital
improvements. The portion of the total that goes to park or facilities
projects depends on the specific eligible projects.
PARK IMPACT FEES
Park Impact Fees are fees imposed on new development to pay
for capital projects required to accommodate the impacts of
development on the City’s infrastructure. Renton’s existing (2019-20)
park impact fee is $3,945 for single family and $2,676 – $3,203 for
multi-family developments (depending on the number of units). A
rate study to re-evaluate the impact fee level is recommended.
LIMITED TAX GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS
Also known as councilmanic bonds, these bonds are paid directly out
of the general fund and require no additional taxation. Therefore, no
authorizing vote is necessary, however the City must have the ability
to repay the bonds prior to bond issuance. These bonds may be used
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
140 | CITY OF RENTON
CHAPTER SIX
for any purpose (not only capital). In 2018, the Council authorized
$14.5 million in councilmanic bonds to fund up to 43 major park
improvement projects across the system.
RECENT GRANT SOURCES
The City of Renton has had success competing for grant funding
from a wide range of programs. Recent grants received by the City of
Renton were funded by:
• King County Conservation District;
• King County Conservation Futures;
• King County Youth and Amateur Sports Grant;
• Washington Department of Natural Resources;
• Land and Water Conservation Fund;
• Washington Wildlife and Recreation Program;
• Community Development Block Grant (CDBG);
• King County Best Starts for Kids; and
• King County Veterans, Seniors and Human Services Levy
Grant.
OTHER RECENT FUNDING SOURCES
• The Riverview Bridge and Sunset Neighborhood Park projects
received direct legislative appropriations of nearly $6 million
in total, recognizing the alignment with State priorities.
• Charles L. Custer/Renton Park Department Memorial Fund:
The City’s park system benefits from an estate gift managed
by the Renton Community Foundation, which funds small
enhancements to the park system.
• George S. Ikuta Memorial Fund: The Renton Senior Activity
Center benefits from an estate gift managed by the Renton
Community Foundation, which funds programs for seniors at
the Renton Activity Senior Center.
• Sam Chastain Scholarship Fund: This fund provides
recreational scholarships to low income youth and families
who live within the city limits of Renton, or in the Renton
School District boundaries.
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 141
IMPLEMENTATION
Other Funding Options
There are a number of additional options Renton could consider for
funding parks, recreation and natural area improvements. The list
below represents both capital and operations funding sources.
KING COUNTY PARKS, RECREATION,
TRAILS, AND OPEN SPACE LEVY
In August of 2019, King County voters approved Proposition 1,
funding operations and maintenance of existing parks and trails,
access to recreation, regional trail development, open space
acquisition and aquatic facilities. Twenty-four percent of the funding
raised will be distributed among cities in King County to fund any
local park and recreation purpose. A total of $810 million in funding
under this levy will be collected and spent between 2020 and 2025.
Four grant programs will be established by King County in addition to
annual direct appropriations. Renton’s 6-year appropriation will be
approximately $1,944,000.
UNLIMITED GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND
These are voter-approved bonds paid off by an assessment
placed on real property. The money may only be used for capital
improvements. This property tax is levied for a specified period of
time (usually 15-20 years) and passage requires a 60% approval.
Major disadvantages of this funding option are the voter approval
requirement and the interest costs.
CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION
This is a lease-purchase approach where the City sells Certificates of
Participation (COPs) to a lending institution. The City then pays the
loan off from revenue produced by the facility or from its general
operating budget. The lending institution holds title to the property
until the COPs are repaid. This procedure does not require a vote of
the public.
REVENUE BONDS
These bonds are sold to investors and are paid back from the revenue
generated from the facility operation.
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
142 | CITY OF RENTON
CHAPTER SIX
METROPOLITAN PARK DISTRICT
A special tax district, authorized under RCW 35.61.210; a board of
park commissioners could take over part or all of park ownership
and operations. If the boundaries of the district match the city limits,
the City Council can serve as the commissioners. Metropolitan Park
Districts are funded by a levy, with the total rate allowed up to
$0.75/1000 of property value. Metropolitan Park Districts are a junior
taxing district, meaning they are among the first to have cuts (called
prorationing) if taxes go above the $5.90 levy rate limit or the 1%
growth limit.
PARK AND RECREATION SERVICE AREA
A type of special tax district that can levy regular property tax up to
$0.60/1,000 property value. Authorized under RCW36.68.400.620,
when voter approved by special levy. A PRSA is typically used for
facilities that serve an unincorporated area.
DONATIONS
The donation of labor, land or cash by service agencies, private
groups or individuals is a popular way to raise small amounts of
money for specific projects. One common example is a service club,
such as Kiwanis, Lions or Rotary, funding playground improvements.
EXCHANGE OF PROPERTY
If the City has an excess parcel of land with some development value,
it could be surplussed for private land more suitable for park use.
JOINT PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP
This concept has become increasingly popular for park and recreation
agencies. The basic approach is for a public agency to enter into
a working agreement with a private corporation to help fund,
build and/or operate a public facility. Generally, the three primary
incentives a public agency can offer are land to place a facility
(usually a park or other parcel of public land), certain tax advantages,
and access to the facility. While the public agency may have to give
up certain responsibilities or control of other recreation services and
amenities, it is one way of obtaining public facilities at a lower cost.
ESTATE GIVING
A variety of arrangements to accept donations for park and
recreation as an element of an estate. One example of this would be
a Lifetime Estate: an agreement between the City and a land owner,
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 143
IMPLEMENTATION
where the City acquires the property but gives the owner the right to
live on the site after the property transfer in exchange for the estate
maintaining the property or for other agreed upon services.
PARTNERSHIPS
The City could consider developing partnerships with other
jurisdictions, agencies or non-profit service providers to implement
projects identified in the Plan. Some potential partners include the
YMCA, Boys and Girls Club, private sport groups, neighborhood
organizations, the County, school districts and neighboring city
governments.
PRIVATE LAND TRUSTS
Private land trusts, such as the Trust for Public Land, Inc. and
the Nature Conservancy will acquire and hold land for eventual
acquisition by a public agency. In some cases repayment of
acquisition funds, including interest, may be required.
SHARED FACILITIES
In some situations other services provided in the city, or in private
utilities, may be able to share the cost of improvements that would
benefit the parks, recreation and natural areas system. One example
is utility corridors; in many cases land used for sanitary sewer, water
or power lines may make an excellent trail corridor, such as the City’s
Honey Creek Trail. In this situation, the utility may pay to develop a
service road that can also serve as a trail.
Grant Programs
Following the City’s own resources, the largest funding source for
park and recreation projects are grants from the State of Washington
Recreation and Conservation Office (RCO). The RCO is responsible for
administering a wide variety of public funds and provides technical
assistance and policy development in addition to preparing statewide
plans on trails, boating facilities, habitat preservation and off-road
vehicles. This section outlines the major RCO programs as well as
several other relevant granting agencies. It is important to note
that most grant programs require a portion of the project cost to be
provided by a local partner as match funding. In most cases granting
agencies will not fund more than 75 percent of a project’s cost. These
programs also require training, tracking and other staff attention
throughout the year to maximize success.
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
144 | CITY OF RENTON
CHAPTER SIX
BOATING FACILITIES PROGRAM (BFP)
This grant program is funded by boaters’ gasoline taxes and
administered by the RCO. Projects eligible under this program
include acquisition, development, planning and renovation projects
associated with launching ramps, transient moorage and upland
support facilities. RCO allocates up to $200,000 for planning projects
and up to $1,000,000 for acquisition, development or projects that
combine planning with acquisition or development. Grants are
distributed on an annual basis and require a minimum of 25 percent
matching funds by a local agency.
LAND AND WATER CONSERVATION FUND (LWCF)
This is a federal grant program that receives its money from
offshore oil and gas drilling. The money is distributed through the
National Park Service and is administered locally by the RCO. In
2014, Congress established the LWCF Outdoor Recreation Legacy
Partnership program, which provides grants to acquire or develop
public lands for outdoor recreation in areas with 50,000 or more
people, or in areas with too few parks and significant populations of
people who are poor, young, or minorities. The funds can be used
for acquisition and development or renovation of outdoor recreation
areas and require a 50 percent match. Local agencies must have at
least 10 percent of the total project cost come from a non-state, non-
federal contribution.
WASHINGTON WILDLIFE AND
RECREATION PROGRAM (WWRP)
This program is administered by the RCO and supports the
acquisition of valuable recreation and habitat lands for preservation
and the development of recreation areas for growing populations.
Projects eligible under this program include acquisition and
development of parks, water access sites, trails, critical wildlife
habitat, natural areas and urban wildlife habitat. Applicants must
provide a minimum of a 50 percent non-RCO match. Local park
projects have maximum requests of $500,000 for development and
$1 million for acquisition costs. There are no maximum request levels
in the following categories: urban wildlife habitat, critical habitat,
natural areas, trails, riparian protection and water access.
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 145
IMPLEMENTATION
YOUTH ATHLETIC FACILITIES (YAF)
The Youth Athletic Facilities is a grant program designed to provide
funding for new, improved and better maintained outdoor athletic
facilities that focus on serving youth through the age of 18 but can
serve all ages. The program is administered by the RCO and applicants
must provide matching funds of at least 50 percent. An additional 10
percent of the total project cost must be from a non-state, non-federal
contribution. The grant amounts vary from $25,000 to a maximum of
$350,000.
NO CHILD LEFT INSIDE
This program provides grant funds for outdoor environmental,
ecological, agricultural, or other natural resource-based education
and recreation programs serving youth. The grant program is divided
into three tiers, with Tier 1 providing a minimum of $5,000 and Tier 3
providing a maximum of $150,000. Tier 2 and 3 projects have a match
requirement of 25 percent.
AQUATIC LAND ENHANCEMENT ACCOUNT (ALEA)
This program is administered by the RCO and supports the purchase,
improvement or protection of and access to aquatic lands for public
purposes. Applicants must provide a minimum of a 50 percent match.
Grant amounts range from $500,000 for restoration and development
projects to $1 million for acquisition projects.
SALMON RECOVERY FUNDING BOARD (SRFB)
Salmon recovery grants are awarded by the Salmon Recovery Funding
Board, from state and federal sources, to protect and restore salmon
habitat. The board funds projects that protect existing, high quality
habitats for salmon and that restore degraded habitat to increase
overall habitat health and biological productivity. The board also
awards grants for feasibility assessments to determine future projects
and for other salmon related activities. Projects may include the
actual habitat used by salmon and the land and water that support
ecosystem functions and processes important to salmon. The program
funds acquisition, restoration, design and non-capital projects with no
project funding limit. Local agencies are required to match 15 percent
of grant funds except for design-only projects.
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
146 | CITY OF RENTON
CHAPTER SIX
ESTUARY AND SALMON RESTORATION
PROGRAM (ESRP)
This program provides grants to protect and restore the Puget
Sound near-shore habitat. The program was created by Washington
Department of Fish and Wildlife to support emerging priorities of the
Puget Sound Nearshore Ecosystem Restoration Program. Program
priorities steer funding towards projects focused on restoring
physical ecological processes. All phases of project development from
feasibility to implementation are eligible for funding. A match of 30
percent of the total project cost is required. There is no grant cap for
this program.
BOATING INFRASTRUCTURE GRANT PROGRAM (BIG)
The Boating Infrastructure Grant Program provides funding to
develop and renovate boating facilities targeting recreational boats
26 feet and larger. Grants also may be used for boater education.
This program is funded by the Aquatic Resources Trust Fund and
administered by the RCO. The local agency match requirement is 25
percent and projects are split into two categories: projects under
$192,086 and projects over $200,001 (not to exceed $1,440,645 per
project).
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
BLOCK GRANTS (CDBG)
These grants from the Federal Department of Housing and Urban
Development are available for a wide variety of projects. Most are
used for projects in lower income areas of the community because of
funding rules. Grants can cover up to 100 percent of project costs.
FIXING AMERICA’S SURFACE
TRANSPORTATION (FAST) ACT OF 2015
The FAST act funds surface transportation across the country using
a combination of federal funding, primarily the gas tax. One of
the funding programs is a block grant to states that includes set-
aside funding for Transportation Alternatives. This funding can be
applied to a variety of smaller-scale transportation projects such
as pedestrian and bicycle facilities, recreational trails, safe routes
to school projects, community improvements such as historic
preservation and vegetation management, and environmental
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 147
IMPLEMENTATION
mitigation related to stormwater and habitat connectivity. The
Washington Department of Transportation (WSDOT) administers
the Transportation Alternatives funding through the Regional
Transportation Planning Organization (RTPO). The Puget Sound
Regional Council is Renton’s RTPO.
RECREATIONAL TRAILS PROGRAM (RTP)
The Recreational Trails Program, part of the FAST Act and
administered by RCO, provides funds to rehabilitate and maintain
recreational trails and facilities. These grants support a backcountry
experience, which means that the trail’s physical setting, not its
distance from a city or road, should be predominately natural. For
example, a backcountry trail can provide views of cities or towns.
Backcountry also means that the user will experience nature as
opposed to seeing or hearing evidence of human development
and activity. This grant program provides for trail-related facilities
for both non-motorized and motorized trail uses. Under limited
circumstances, new “linking” trails, relocations, and education
proposals are also eligible. This program requires a 20 percent match
and grants top out at $150,000 for general projects and $20,000 for
educational projects.
U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE (USFWS)
USFWS may provide technical assistance and administer funding
for projects related to water quality improvement through debris
and habitat/vegetation management, watershed management and
stream bank erosion, and sediment deposition projects.
PRIVATE GRANTS AND FOUNDATIONS
Private corporations and foundations provide money for a wide range
of projects, targeted to the organizations’ mission. Some foundations
do not provide grants to governments but will often grant to partner
organizations. Private grants can be difficult to secure because of
the open competition and the up-front investment in research and
relationship building.
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
148 | CITY OF RENTON
CHAPTER SIX
KING COUNTY CONSERVATION FUTURES GRANTS
The Conservations Futures Tax (CFT) funds the purchase of open
space lands such as natural areas, urban green spaces, passive parks,
regional trails, farms, and forests. CFT project sites can be used for
low-impact passive recreational activities, including hiking, walking,
open play, riding bikes or horses on dispersed trails, picnicking, and
gardening. King County’s Conservation Futures program is guided by
open space priorities in local community plans. The grants require
50% of the project funding to come from other sources.
MONITORING, REVIEWING
AND UPDATING
The vision, goals and objectives of this Plan should serve this
community to the end of this decade and beyond. However, it will be
important to check in with the community and validate or adjust the
plan for any major shifts in priorities or project opportunities. The
six-year period defined by the Recreation and Conservation Office
presents a good time for this check in.
The implementation of this Plan will continue well past the six- year
update cycle mandated by the state. Following the adoption of
this Plan, the staff and the Parks Commission could develop a work
plan. This work plan should recognize that there are factors that
may limit the ability to move forward on any one project but each
high priority site could have recommendation elements that can be
moved forward. This work plan can be revisited biannually, ahead of
the budgeting process, to reevaluate progress and priorities (making
use of the prioritization criteria and other decision making tools) and
adjust for new opportunities.
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
7
CONCEPT PLANS
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
150 | CITY OF RENTON
As a part of the planning process, the consulting team created a series of
concept plans to illustrate some of the recommended types of facilities and
how these facilities can fit into existing and proposed parks. These concepts
were created as one vision of how these parks can be designed, and utilized
community input from the parks, recreation and natural areas planning
process. The Draft Concept Plans were available for review and comment
by the staff, public, the project Steering Committee, Parks Commission,
Planning Commission and the Council Committee of the Whole. While the
concepts were well received as presented, the recommendations for each of
these park locations include developing a formal park master plan. The park
master plan process provides the opportunity for more detailed discussion
with the community to learn about their ideas and desires for future park
development, as well as discuss opportunities and constraints the site may
have. These concept plans create a starting point for these discussions.
CONCEPT PLANS
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 151
The selected sites for the concept plans provide a range of park types, sizes and settings to give a broad
view of possibilities. There is at least one concept plan for each Community Planning Area with the
exceptions of Fairwood, which is outside Renton city limits, and West Hill, which is largely outside of the
Renton city limits. The concepts are illustrated over an air photo of the existing site.
The concept plans include:
• Black River Riparian Forest
• Cleveland Richardson Property
• East Plateau Community Park
• Edlund Property
• Highlands Park and Neighborhood Center
• Kennydale Lions Park
• May Creek Park
• Riverside: Tri-Park (Cedar River Park, Liberty Park, N.A.R.CO Property)
• Tiffany Park/Cascade Park Connection
• Windsor Hills Park
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
152 | CITY OF RENTON
CHAPTER SEVEN
BN INC RDACCESS RDWY
ACCESS RDPOWELL AVE SWS 13
5
T
H
S
T
NACHES AVE SW81ST AVE S80TH AVE SSW 3R
D
P
L
SW
4
T
H
P
L
OAKSDALE AVE S
W
BN
INC
RD
ACCESS RD
ACCESS RD
BN
INC
RD
ACCESS RD
POWELL AVE SWMONSTER RD SW68TH AVE SSW 7TH ST
SR 9
0
0
MO
N
S
T
E
R
R
D
S
W
OAKESDALE AVE SW6: Black River Riparian Forest Concept Plan
Data Sources: City of Renton, GIS and King County GIS
NAD83 HARN State Plane Washington North FIPS 4601
June 2011
1 inch = 500 feet
0 500 1,000250
Feet
LEGEND
Park Limit Line
Regional Trail Connection
Pedestrian Paths - Soft/Natural Paving
Paved Trail/Sidewalk
Picnic Area
Seating Area
Overlook/Viewing Area
Kiosk
Informational and/or Interpretive Signage
Boardwalk Tail
Bridge
Point of Interest
Entry/Gateway
N
i
i
i
i
k
k
k
i
i
Lake to Sound Regional Trail
ExistingSpringbrook Trail
Boardwalk Through Wetland Area With Interpretive Signage & Overlook
King County WaterworksGarden
RestoredHabitat Area Adjacent to InterpretiveCenter
Entry Gateway
Lake to Sound Regional Trail Connection
SmallInterpretive/EducationalCenter with 12-15 space parking lot
1. BLACK RIVER RIPARIAN FOREST CONCEPT PLAN
N
0 250 500 1000
FeetData Sources: City of Renton GIS and King County GIS
NAD83 HARN State Plane Washington North FIPS 4601
2019
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 153
CONCEPT PLANS
BN INC RDACCESS RDWY
ACCESS RDPOWELL AVE SWS 13
5
T
H
S
T
NACHES AVE SW81ST AVE S80TH AVE SSW 3
R
D
P
L
SW
4
T
H
P
L
OAKSDALE AVE S
W
BN
INC
R
D
ACCESS RD
ACCESS RD
BN
INC
RD
ACCESS RD
POWELL AVE SWMONSTER RD SW68TH AVE SSW 7TH ST
SR 9
0
0
MO
N
S
T
E
R
R
D
S
W
OAKESDALE AVE SW6: Black River Riparian Forest Concept Plan
Data Sources: City of Renton, GIS and King County GIS
NAD83 HARN State Plane Washington North FIPS 4601
June 2011
1 inch = 500 feet
0 500 1,000250
Feet
LEGEND
Park Limit Line
Regional Trail Connection
Pedestrian Paths - Soft/Natural Paving
Paved Trail/Sidewalk
Picnic Area
Seating Area
Overlook/Viewing Area
Kiosk
Informational and/or Interpretive Signage
Boardwalk Tail
Bridge
Point of Interest
Entry/Gateway
N
i
i
i
i
k
k
k
i
i
Lake to Sound Regional Trail
ExistingSpringbrook Trail
Boardwalk Through Wetland Area With Interpretive Signage & Overlook
King County WaterworksGarden
RestoredHabitat Area Adjacent to InterpretiveCenter
Entry Gateway
Lake to Sound Regional Trail Connection
SmallInterpretive/EducationalCenter with 12-15 space parking lot
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
154 | CITY OF RENTON
CHAPTER SEVEN
7: Cleveland Richardson Property Concept Plan
Data Sources: City of Renton, GIS and King County GIS
NAD83 HARN State Plane Washington North FIPS 4601
June 2011
1 inch = 300 feet
0 300 600150
Feet
Non-Programmed
Multi-Use
Sport Fields
(230’x 360’)
Play Area
Observation Deck
& Overlook
Meadow
Picnic
Group Picnic Area
Existing House
Parking Lot
(25 Spaces)
Event Lawn
Pond
LEGEND
Park Limit Line
Pedestrian Paths - Soft/Natural Paving
Picnic Area
Play Area (with areas for 2-5 yrs and 5-12 yrs)
Bridge
Deck at Pond Edge
Creek
N
2. CLEVELAND RICHARDSON PROPERTY CONCEPT PLAN
N
0 150 300 600
FeetData Sources: City of Renton GIS and King County GIS
NAD83 HARN State Plane Washington North FIPS 4601
2019
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 155
CONCEPT PLANS
7: Cleveland Richardson Property Concept Plan
Data Sources: City of Renton, GIS and King County GIS
NAD83 HARN State Plane Washington North FIPS 4601
June 2011
1 inch = 300 feet
0 300 600150
Feet
Non-Programmed
Multi-Use
Sport Fields
(230’x 360’)
Play Area
Observation Deck
& Overlook
Meadow
Picnic
Group Picnic Area
Existing House
Parking Lot
(25 Spaces)
Event Lawn
Pond
LEGEND
Park Limit Line
Pedestrian Paths - Soft/Natural Paving
Picnic Area
Play Area (with areas for 2-5 yrs and 5-12 yrs)
Bridge
Deck at Pond Edge
Creek
N
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
156 | CITY OF RENTON
CHAPTER SEVEN
MaplewoodHeightsElementary
SE 138TH PL
SE 2ND ST
152ND AVE SESE 136TH ST
SE 2ND CT
147TH PL SESE 139TH PL
149TH PL SE146TH AVE SE145TH AVE SEILWACO PL SENE 1ST PLSE
1
4
1
S
T
S
T
SE 140TH PL143RD AVE SE148TH PL SESE 140TH ST
150TH PL SEHOQUIAM PL SEORCAS AVE NESE 1ST PL
SE 136 LN
NE 1ST ST
PRIVATE RD SHADOW AVE NE146TH PL SESE 137TH PL
SE 133RD CT
153RD PL SEROSARIO AVE SESE 2ND PL
ROSARIO PL SESE 1ST ST
SE 141ST PL
144TH AVE SESHADOW PL SEQUINCY PL SEORCAS PL
NE
SE 138TH ST
SE 139TH CTSE 139TH PL
143RD AVE SE146TH AVE SESE 136TH ST
SE 2ND ST
NE 1ST PL143RD AVE SENE 1ST PL
SE 140TH PL
SE 2ND CT
148TH PL SESE 142ND ST144TH AVE SESE
1
4
1
S
T
S
T
8: New Community Park - East Renton Concept Plan
Data Sources: City of Renton, GIS and King County GIS
NAD83 HARN State Plane Washington North FIPS 4601
June 2011
1 inch = 350 feet
0 350 700175
FeetEEEEPPH PLH
P
H
SE 136TH STSE 136TH
EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEKing County Cedar to SammamishTrail
Natural Park Area
With Trails &
Seating Areas
Open Turf Area
Small Picnic Area
Practice
Field
(230’x360’)
[2] Group Picnic Pavilions
Parking Lot (70 Spaces)
BaseballField
PedestrianConnection
Restroom
Baseball Field
Tot Play Area
School Age Play Area
[2] Basketball Courts
SeatingArea
PedestrianEntry
PedestrianEntry, Typical
Meadow
LEGEND
Park Limit Line
Trail Connection
Pedestrian Paths - Soft/Natural Paving
Group Picnic Pavilions
Picnic Area
Seating Area
School Age Play Area (5-12yrs)
Tot Play Area (2-5 yrs.)
N
3. EAST PLATEAU COMMUNITY PARK CONCEPT PLAN
N
0 175 350 700
FeetData Sources: City of Renton GIS and King County GIS
NAD83 HARN State Plane Washington North FIPS 4601
2019
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 157
CONCEPT PLANS
MaplewoodHeightsElementary
SE 138TH PL
SE 2ND ST
152ND AVE SESE 136TH ST
SE 2ND CT
147TH PL SESE 139TH PL
149TH PL SE146TH AVE SE145TH AVE SEILWACO PL SENE 1ST PLSE
1
4
1
S
T
S
T
SE 140TH PL143RD AVE SE148TH PL SESE 140TH ST
150TH PL SEHOQUIAM PL SEORCAS AVE NESE 1ST PL
SE 136 LN
NE 1ST ST
PRIVATE RD SHADOW AVE NE146TH PL SESE 137TH PL
SE 133RD CT
153RD PL SEROSARIO AVE SESE 2ND PL
ROSARIO PL SESE 1ST ST
SE 141ST PL
144TH AVE SESHADOW PL SEQUINCY PL SEORCAS PL
NE
SE 138TH ST
SE 139TH CTSE 139TH PL
143RD AVE SE146TH AVE SESE 136TH ST
SE 2ND ST
NE 1ST PL143RD AVE SENE 1ST PL
SE 140TH PL
SE 2ND CT
148TH PL SESE 142ND ST144TH AVE SESE
1
4
1
S
T
S
T
8: New Community Park - East Renton Concept Plan
Data Sources: City of Renton, GIS and King County GIS
NAD83 HARN State Plane Washington North FIPS 4601
June 2011
1 inch = 350 feet
0 350 700175
FeetEEEEPPH PLH
P
H
SE 136TH STSE
1
3
6
T
H
EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEKing County Cedar to SammamishTrail
Natural Park Area
With Trails &
Seating Areas
Open Turf Area
Small Picnic Area
Practice
Field
(230’x360’)
[2] Group Picnic Pavilions
Parking Lot (70 Spaces)
BaseballField
PedestrianConnection
Restroom
Baseball Field
Tot Play Area
School Age Play Area
[2] Basketball Courts
SeatingArea
PedestrianEntry
PedestrianEntry, Typical
Meadow
LEGEND
Park Limit Line
Trail Connection
Pedestrian Paths - Soft/Natural Paving
Group Picnic Pavilions
Picnic Area
Seating Area
School Age Play Area (5-12yrs)
Tot Play Area (2-5 yrs.)
N
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
158 | CITY OF RENTON
CHAPTER SEVEN
S 38TH CT
103RD AVE SES 37TH PL
MILL AVE SE98TH AVE
S
PRIVATE RD
S 178TH
S
T96TH AVE
S
S 177TH ST SMITHERS AVE SBURNETT CT S97TH AVE SMORRIS AVE SSMITHERS AVE SSE CARR RD
S CARR R
D
4: Edlund Property Concept Plan
Data Sources: City of Renton, GIS and King County GIS
NAD83 HARN State Plane Washington North FIPS 4601
June 2011
1 inch = 200 feet
0 200 400100
Feet
School Age Play Area
Net Climbing Course
PicnicPavilions
Restroom/Kiosk
Garden & Patio
PedestrianVehicular & Trail Entry & Connections
Existing Barn (Future use to be determined)
Tot Play Area
Seating/Picnic Area
Future Connection to Panther Creek Wetland
Drop-off Entry
Turf
Turf
Parking Lot(15 Spaces)
Meadow Area or Restore Wetland
Restore Covered Bridge
LEGEND
Park Limit Line
Pedestrian Paths
Trail
Vehicular Circulation
Group Picnic Pavilion
Picnic Area
Seating Area
Perimeter/Buffer Planting
Shaded Seating/Arbor
School Age Play Area (5-12)
Tot Play Area (2-5)
Pedestrian Bridge
Creek
N
4. EDLUND PROPERTY CONCEPT PLAN
N
0 100 200 400
FeetData Sources: City of Renton GIS and King County GIS
NAD83 HARN State Plane Washington North FIPS 4601
2019
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 159
CONCEPT PLANS
S 38TH CT
103RD AVE SES 37TH PL
MILL AVE SE98TH AVE
S
PRIVATE RD
S 178TH
S
T96TH AVE
S
S 177TH STSMITHERS AVE SBURNETT CT S97TH AVE SMORRIS AVE SSMITHERS AVE SSE CARR RD
S CARR RD
4: Edlund Property Concept Plan
Data Sources: City of Renton, GIS and King County GIS
NAD83 HARN State Plane Washington North FIPS 4601
June 2011
1 inch = 200 feet
0 200 400100
Feet
School Age Play Area
Net Climbing Course
PicnicPavilions
Restroom/Kiosk
Garden & Patio
PedestrianVehicular & Trail Entry & Connections
Existing Barn (Future use to be determined)
Tot Play Area
Seating/Picnic Area
Future Connection to Panther Creek Wetland
Drop-off Entry
Turf
Turf
Parking Lot(15 Spaces)
Meadow Area or Restore Wetland
Restore Covered Bridge
LEGEND
Park Limit Line
Pedestrian Paths
Trail
Vehicular Circulation
Group Picnic Pavilion
Picnic Area
Seating Area
Perimeter/Buffer Planting
Shaded Seating/Arbor
School Age Play Area (5-12)
Tot Play Area (2-5)
Pedestrian Bridge
Creek
N
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
160 | CITY OF RENTON
CHAPTER SEVEN
NE 9TH ST
DAYTON AVE NEHARRINGTON AVE NEDAYTON ALY NEEDMONDS ALY NENE 6TH P
L
NE 8TH ST
NE 8TH PLGLENWOOD ALY NEFERNDALE CT NENE 7
T
H
A
L
Y GLENWOOD AVE NEFERNDALE CIR NEFERNDALE ALY NEEDMONDS ALY NENE 7TH STEDMONDS AVE NE10: Highlands Park and Neighborhood Center Concept Plan
Data Sources: City of Renton, GIS and King County GIS
NAD83 HARN State Plane Washington North FIPS 4601
June 2011
1 inch = 150 feet
0 150 30075
Feet
Plaza Area with Benches and Tables
SkateArea
(14,000sf)
Restroom
Parking Lot (50 Spaces)
CommunityCenter[2] Gyms(31,500 sf)
SoftballField
[2] Tennis Courts
[2] Basketball Courts Improve Field (Drainage)
Orchard With Fruit Trees
Perimeter Path
Group Picnic Area-Common Grills
Small Picnic Area
Open Turf Area
Open Turf
HIGHLANDSELEMENTARYSCHOOL
CommunityGarden
“Outdoor Kitchen”-Prep. Sink-Grill-Tables
Tot Play Area (2-5)
School Age Play Area (5-12)
Practice Field(230’x 360’)
LEGEND
Park Limit Line
Pedestrian Paths
Vehicular Circulation
Group Picnic Pavilion
Picnic Area
Seating Area
Shaded Seating/Arbor
School Age Area (5-12)
Tot Play Area (2-5)
Community Garden Planting Beds
Skate Area
N
5. HIGHLANDS PARK AND NEIGHBORHOOD
COMMUNITY CENTER CONCEPT PLAN
N
0 75 150 300
FeetData Sources: City of Renton GIS and King County GIS
NAD83 HARN State Plane Washington North FIPS 4601
2019
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 161
CONCEPT PLANS
NE 9TH ST
DAYTON AVE NEHARRINGTON AVE NEDAYTON ALY NEEDMONDS ALY NENE 6TH P
L
NE 8TH ST
NE 8TH PLGLENWOOD ALY NEFERNDALE CT NENE 7
T
H
A
L
YGLENWOOD AVE NEFERNDALE CIR NEFERNDALE ALY NEEDMONDS ALY NENE 7TH STEDMONDS AVE NE10: Highlands Park and Neighborhood Center Concept Plan
Data Sources: City of Renton, GIS and King County GIS
NAD83 HARN State Plane Washington North FIPS 4601
June 2011
1 inch = 150 feet
0 150 30075
Feet
Plaza Area with Benches and Tables
SkateArea
(14,000sf)
Restroom
Parking Lot (50 Spaces)
CommunityCenter[2] Gyms(31,500 sf)
SoftballField
[2] Tennis Courts
[2] Basketball Courts Improve Field (Drainage)
Orchard With Fruit Trees
Perimeter Path
Group Picnic Area-Common Grills
Small Picnic Area
Open Turf Area
Open Turf
HIGHLANDSELEMENTARYSCHOOL
CommunityGarden
“Outdoor Kitchen”-Prep. Sink-Grill-Tables
Tot Play Area (2-5)
School Age Play Area (5-12)
Practice Field(230’x 360’)
LEGEND
Park Limit Line
Pedestrian Paths
Vehicular Circulation
Group Picnic Pavilion
Picnic Area
Seating Area
Shaded Seating/Arbor
School Age Area (5-12)
Tot Play Area (2-5)
Community Garden Planting Beds
Skate Area
N
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
162 | CITY OF RENTON
CHAPTER SEVEN
NE 24TH ST
NE 26TH PL
BLAINE AVE NECAMAS AVE NEMONTEREY AVE NEPRIVATE RDCAMAS AVE NEABERDEEN AVE NENE 27TH ST
2: Kennydale Lions Park Concept Plan
Data Sources: City of Renton, GIS and King County GIS
NAD83 HARN State Plane Washington North FIPS 4601
June 2011
1 inch = 125 feet
0 100 20050
Feet
Turf Area With
Walking Paths
Reduce Parking Lot
Size to 20 Spaces
Picnic Area
New Play Area
With equipment for
ages 2-5 and 5-12
Play Turf Mound
Improve Existing
Neighborhood
Softball Field
Informal
Rectangular
Field
Reclocate Basketball Court Eliminate Portion of
Parking & Enhance
Connection to Park
Area to the North
Planting Area
Tall Fence at
Property Line
LEGEND
Park Limit Line
Pedestrian Paths
Picnic Area
Seating Area
Shaded Seating/Arbor
Play Area
Group Picnic Pavilion With BBQs
N
6. KENNDALE LIONS PARK CONCEPT PLAN
N
0 50 100 200
FeetData Sources: City of Renton GIS and King County GIS
NAD83 HARN State Plane Washington North FIPS 4601
2019
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 163
CONCEPT PLANS
NE 24TH ST
NE 26TH PL
BLAINE AVE NECAMAS AVE NEMONTEREY AVE NEPRIVATE RDCAMAS AVE NEABERDEEN AVE NENE 27TH ST
2: Kennydale Lions Park Concept Plan
Data Sources: City of Renton, GIS and King County GIS
NAD83 HARN State Plane Washington North FIPS 4601
June 2011
1 inch = 125 feet
0 100 20050
Feet
Turf Area With
Walking Paths
Reduce Parking Lot
Size to 20 Spaces
Picnic Area
New Play Area
With equipment for
ages 2-5 and 5-12
Play Turf Mound
Improve Existing
Neighborhood
Softball Field
Informal
Rectangular
Field
Reclocate Basketball CourtEliminate Portion of
Parking & Enhance
Connection to Park
Area to the North
Planting Area
Tall Fence at
Property Line
LEGEND
Park Limit Line
Pedestrian Paths
Picnic Area
Seating Area
Shaded Seating/Arbor
Play Area
Group Picnic Pavilion With BBQs
N
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
164 | CITY OF RENTON
CHAPTER SEVEN
Data Sources: City of Renton GIS and King County GIS
NAD83 HARN State Plane Washington North FIPS 4601
2019
7. MAY CREEK PARK CONCEPT PLAN
N0100200400
Feet
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 165
CONCEPT PLANSRESOLUTION NO. 4398
166 | CITY OF RENTON
CHAPTER SEVEN
8. RIVERSIDE: TRI-PARK (CEDAR RIVER PARK, LIBERTY PARK,
N.A.R.CO PROPERTY) CONCEPT PLAN
N
0 250 500 1000
FeetData Sources: City of Renton GIS and King County GIS
NAD83 HARN State Plane Washington North FIPS 4601
2019
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 167
CONCEPT PLANSRESOLUTION NO. 4398
168 | CITY OF RENTON
CHAPTER SEVEN
9. TIFFANY PARK/CASCADE PARK CONNECTION CONCEPT PLAN
Data Sources: City of Renton GIS and King County GIS
NAD83 HARN State Plane Washington North FIPS 4601
2019 N
0 200 400 800
Feet
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 169
CONCEPT PLANSRESOLUTION NO. 4398
170 | CITY OF RENTON
CHAPTER SEVEN
10. WINDSOR HILLS PARK CONCEPT PLAN
N
0 50 100 200
FeetData Sources: City of Renton GIS and King County GIS
NAD83 HARN State Plane Washington North FIPS 4601
2019
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 171
CONCEPT PLANSRESOLUTION NO. 4398
172 | CITY OF RENTON
CHAPTER SEVEN
This page intentionally left blank
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 173
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Aspen Institute Project Play. 2019. State of Play Seattle-King County.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Park Service. 2015.
Parks, Trails, and Health Workbook. Washington, DC.
City of Renton Recreation and Neighborhoods Division. 2019. STREAM Team
Outcomes Report.
City of Renton Senior Activity Center. 2019. Renton Older Adults Community
Needs Assessment.
City of Renton. Alex Pietsch, Community and Economic Development. 2009.
Community Planning Areas Map.
City of Renton. Leslie Betlach, Parks Planning and Natural Resources. 2019.
Community Services Staffing Summary 1990-2019.
City of Renton. 2006. Tri-Park Master Plan (Liberty Park, Cedar River Park &
NARCO Site).
City of Renton. 2010. Experimental History Project: Renton History Museum
Master Plan.
City of Renton. Comprehensive Plan: Housing and Human Services Element –
2006-2031 Growth Targets. http://rentonwa.gov/.
City of Renton. Comprehensive Plan: Parks, Recreation, Open Space, and Trails
Element – Policy, Goals & Objectives. http://rentonwa.gov/.
City of Renton. January 2019. Renton Trails and Bicycle Master Plan.
City of Renton. October 2018. City of Renton 2019-2020 Adopted Budget.
City of Renton. Sam Chastain Waterfront Trail-Connecting an Important Regional
Trail System.
City Parks Alliance. 2018. Active Parks, Healthy Cities: Recommendations from
the National Study of Neighborhood Parks.
King County agencies. 2008. Communities Count 2008 - Recap of 2009 Data
Updates. King County, WA
MAKERS Architecture, Planning, Urban Design. 2010. City of Renton City Center
Community Plan.
MAKERS Architecture, Planning, Urban Design. 2013. City of Renton Benson Hill
Community Plan.
MIG, Inc. 2018. Renton Downtown Civic Core Vision and Action Plan.
MITHUN, Inc. 2009. Sunset Area Community Investment Strategy. Renton, WA:
City of Renton
National Recreation and Park Association. 2018. Economic Impact of Local
Parks.
Northwest Salmon Discovery Center (Concept Paper) Version 2. April 22, 2010.
Paramatrix. June 2009. Lake to Sound Trail-Feasibility Study. Renton, WA: King
County, WA
Plan-It Geo, LLC. November 2018. Urban Tree Canopy Assessment Report.
Renton, WA: City of Renton.
Puget Sound Regional Council. 2017. Covered Employment Estimates by
Jurisdiction.
State of Washington Office of Financial Management, Forecasting and Research
Division. April 2019. Population Change and Rank for Cities and Towns,
April 1, 2010 to April 1, 2019. Olympia, WA.
BibliographyBibliographyRESOLUTION NO. 4398
174 | CITY OF RENTON
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The Trust for Public Land, National Recreation and Parks Association,
Urban Land Institute. Accessed September 2019. 10 Minute Walk:
Improving Access to Parks and Green Spaces. 10minutewalk.org.
U.S. Census Bureau. 2018. American Community Survey 1-Year Estimaes:
Renton City, WA.
Washington Recreation and Conservation Office. 2015. Economic
Benefits of Outdoor Recreation in Washington Factsheet.
Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission. 2016. A Model for
Measuring the Benefits of State Parks.
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 175
ACKNOWLEDGMENTSGlossary Terms
The following definitions are provided for the purposes of the parks, recreation and natural areas system
and this plan.
• Active Recreation: activities focused on health, competition, skill development or play that center
around a recreation facility such as a sports field, court, playground or building.
• Passive Recreation: activities that focus on the enjoyment of the environment and center around
the built or natural landscape such as open lawns, seating areas that take advantage of views or
being surrounded by nature.
• Level of Service (LOS) Standard: a ratio of land or facilities based on population, used to track the
status of the system as it grows and establish the impact of population growth from development.
• Need: a finding based on a quantitative or qualitative analysis.
• Demand: a finding based on unique, important or multiple community voices.
• Neighborhood Park: close-to-home recreation opportunities for nearby residents, who typically live
within walking and bicycling distance (.25-.5 miles) of the park in a residential setting. See Design
Guidelines, Appendix B.
• Community Park: opportunities for active recreation and organized play in a location that can
accommodate increased traffic and demand, while also serving the neighborhood park function for
nearby residents. See Design Guidelines, Appendix B.
• Regional Park: destination park locations that can accommodate communitywide and regional
traffic and demand, while also fulfilling the function of a community and neighborhood park for
nearby residents. See Design Guidelines, Appendix B.
• Special Use Park: space for unique features or places that create variety in the park system but
cannot be accommodated within other park sites due to size or location requirements. See Design
Guidelines, Appendix B.
• Natural Area: opportunities for users to interact with local nature or protect natural resources and
systems within the standards of the existing natural resource regulatory environment. See Design
Guidelines, Appendix B.
• Corridor: Narrow swath of land that serve as connections between parks or to other destinations.
See Design Guidelines, Appendix B.
• Grey Infrastructure: The physical framework of the city, commonly thought of as the system of
streets, pipes, facilities, bridges, towers and power lines that provide essential services.
• Green Infrastructure: Natural systems that perform some of the same essential services such
as cleaning water, and retaining stormwater run-off as well as many additional functions such
as cleaning the air, cooling our streets and processing and storing carbon that would otherwise
contribute to atmospheric warming. Green infrastructure is often thought of in terms of
multifunctional green infrastructure, where one piece of land or natural system can provide multiple
benefits to the community. Green Infrastructure can exist in natural forms or be engineered for a
particular purpose.
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
176 | CITY OF RENTON
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS RESOLUTION NO. 4398
A
PARK AND FACILITY INVENTORY
APPENDIX
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
178 | CITY OF RENTON
APPENDIx A: PARK AND FACILITY INVENTORY
This page intentionally left blank
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 179
APPENDIX A: PARK AND FACILITY INVENTORY Appendix A1 - City Inventory
Park Acres Status
Diamond
Shaped
Fields
Rectangular
Fields
Multi‐
Purpose
Fields
Tennis
Courts
Basketball
Courts Play Eqpt. Open Lawn Trail/ Access
Picnic
Shelter Swimming
Outdoor
Restrooms
Indoor
Restrooms
Rentable
Space
Programmable
Space
Parking
Spaces
Parking
Area (SF)Misc. Facilities
Recreation Center Building
Type**
Neighborhood Park
Burnett Linear Park*1.1 Developed Yes Yes Trail, Plaza
Cascade Park 11.1 Developed Yes Yes Trails
Cleveland Richardson Property 23.8 Future Park
Earlington Park*1.5 Developed 1 Yes Yes
Edlund Property 17.7 Future Park
Glencoe Park*0.5 Developed Yes Yes
Heritage Park 9.2 Developed 1 0.5 Yes Yes
115 3,000 Soft‐surface loop trail and paved loop trail
Jones Park 1.1 Developed Yes Yes
1 Trail
Kennydale Beach Park***1.3 Developed Yes Beach 1 12 2,700
Kennydale Lions Park 5.5 Developed 1 1 Yes Yes 1 38 26,000 Neighborhood
Kenyon Dobson 2.2 Future Park
Kiwanis Park 9.0 Developed 1 2 1 Yes Yes 1 53 25,000 Neighborhood
Maplewood Park 2.0 Developed 1 1 Yes 1
May Creek Park 16.6 Future Park
North Highlands Park and
Neighborhood Center
2.6 Developed 1 Yes Yes 1 16 12,600 Meadow Crest Accessible Playground: Fully inclusive playground developed in partnership on
City and Renton School District Owned property
Neighborhood
Parkwood South Div #3 Park*0.6 Future Park
Philip Arnold Park 11.1 Developed 121YesYes 1 1155 27,000 Neighborhood
Riverview Park 12.1 Developed Yes 1132 21,500 Canoe launch, Interpretive trail
SE 186th Place Properties*0.6 Future Park
Sunset Neighborhood Park 3.2 Developed Yes Yes Yes 1 Fitness, Regional Stormwater Facility, Interpretive Signage, Mist Feature
Talbot Hill Reservoir Park 2.6 Developed 3 Yes Portable 14 8,500 Tennis practice board; 3 Pickleball courts
Thomas Teasdale Park 9.7 Developed 1 1 Yes Yes 1 1 47 23,000 Neighborhood
Tiffany Park 6.7 Developed 1 2 1 Yes Yes 1 33 10,700 Neighborhood
Windsor Hills Park 4.6 Developed 0.5 Yes Yes
156.3 0 0 710816164 5 1 9 4 9 6 305 160,000
Community Park
Cedar River Park 20.6 Developed 1YesAquatic Center 2
373 150,000 Community Center, Theatre
Cedar River Trail Park 15.1 Developed Yes 1 1 127 86,750 Small boat launch, Boathouse
Highlands Park and
Neighborhood Center
10.8 Developed 1 1 2 2 Yes 1 25 33,000 Safe route to school Neighborhood
Liberty Park 10.6 Developed 2 3 1 Yes Yes
12168 50,000 Skatepark, Grandstand Administration Building
N.A.R.CO Property 24.0 Future Park Dog Park (Temporary)
Ron Regis Park 43.4 Developed 1 1 2 1 Yes Portables 115 50,000 Two Future Park field spaces are currently used, one as a practice field and one as a temporary
cricket pitch
124.5 4 1 4543352 1 6 13 2 808369,750
Regional Park
Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park*** 51.3 Developed 2 0 Yes Yes
4Beach4 390 275,000 Two restaurants (one with separate restrooms); Eight lane boat launch; boat launch parking ‐
123 stalls; Day moorage with six finger piers; Waterwalk with two floating picnic pads;
Swimming beach with waterwalk; Picnic pavilion; Bathhouse with concession stand, restrooms;
Five wooden bridges; Fishing pier with shelter; Canoe launch with wooden float; Sailing club;
Two sand volle yball courts; Horseshoe court.
51.3 0 0 0201114 1 4 01 0 390275,000
Special Use Park
Community Garden/Greenhouse 0.6 Developed
Maplewood Golf Course 192.3 Developed 3 191 70,000 30 stall heated driving range, restaurant, lounge, banquet facility and pro shop
Maplewood Roadside Park 1.0 Developed Yes 32 Cedar River Trail access
Piazza & Gateway 0.9 Developed Yes Plaza
Senior Activity Center Property 2.8 Developed
1 100 26,700 Patio, Fountain Senior Center
Sit In Park***0.5 Developed
Tonkin Park 0.2 Developed Yes Bandstand
Veterans Memorial Park 0.2 Developed
198.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 4 3 1 323 96,700
Natural Area
Black River Riparian Forest 93.3 Natural Area 3 660
Cedar River Natural Area 264.2 Natural Area
Honey Creek Greenway 43.0 Natural Area
Lake Street Open Space 0.3 Natural Area
May Creek Greenway 42.0 Natural Area Soft surface loop trail and interpretive signage
Panther Creek/Edlund Property 3.7 Natural Area
Panther Creek Wetlands 69.0 Natural Area
Renton Wetlands 139.2 Natural Area Boardwalk
Springbrook Watershed 52.2 Natural Area
Tiffany Park / Cascade Park Connection 4.8 Natural Area
711.7 0 0 0000050 0 0 0 0 0 3660
Corridor
Cedar River Trail Corridor (City Owned) 1.8 Developed
1.8 0 0 0000010 0 0 00 0 00
TOTAL PARKS AND NATURAL AREAS 1,244.1 4 1 11 17 12 20 23 19 11 3 19 9 16 9 1,829 902,110
* Parks that have been provisionally classified even though they do not meet minimum size or other design guidelines
*** Developed Park Area not entirely under fee simple ownership
Subtotal Neighborhood Park
Subtotal Community Park
Subtotal Open Space Park
Subtotal Special Use Park
Subtotal Corridors
Subtotal Regional Park
Renton_ParkInventory 111819
Table A.1 - City Inventory
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
180 | CITY OF RENTON
APPENDIX A: PARK AND FACILITY INVENTORY
This page intentionally left blank
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
CITY OF RENTON | PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 181
Appendix A2 - Schools
Site Acreage
Diamond
Shaped
Fields
Rectangular
Fields
Multi‐Use
Fields
Outdoor
Tennis Court Indoor Pool
Elementary Schools
Benson Hill Elementary 15.1 1
Campbell Hill Elementary 9.0 1
Cascade Elementary 14.9 2
Hazelwood Elementary 15.0 1
Highlands Elementary 6.8 2
Honeydew Elementary 12.4 3
Kennydale Elementary 7.0 1
Maplewood Heights Elementary 8.7 1
Renton Park Elementary 9.6 2
Sartori Elementary 5.3 1
Sierra Heights Elementary 15.4 2
Talbot Hill Elementary 11.2 1
Tiffany Park Elementary 9.7 2
Subtotal Elementary 125.0 201800
Middle Schools
Dimmitt Middle School 15.1 1 1
McKnight Middle School 20.2 3 0 4
Nelsen Middle School 21.1 1 1 4
Subtotal Middle Schools 56.4 51540
High Schools
Hazen High School 33.8 2** 1** 2** 4 1
Lindbergh High School 37.3 2 1 4 1
Renton High School 25.8 4104
Subtotal High Schools 96.9 6 2 0 12 2
Other Schools/Facilities
Renton Academy 10.0 1
Renton Stadium 16.8 1**
Meadow Crest Early Learning Center 7.4
H.O.M.E. Program 10.0 0
Renton Ikea Performing Arts Center ND
Subtotal Other Schools 44.2 00100
TOTAL ALL SCHOOLS 322.4 13 3 24 16 2
School
** Fields are locked and not accessible to the public; not counted in totals
This inventory includes schools within Renton City Limits
Renton_ParkInventory 111819
Table A.2 - Schools
APPENDIx A: PARK AND FACILITY INVENTORYRESOLUTION NO. 4398
This page intentionally left blank
182 | CITY OF RENTON
APPENDIx A: PARK AND FACILITY INVENTORYRESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 183
APPENDIX A: PARK AND FACILITY INVENTORY
Appendix A3- Field Inventory
Programmed
Park Field Diamond/infieldRectangleComplexMultipurposeAdultYouth AdaptiveYes/NoNatural
Turf
Synthetic
Turf
All Ability
Surface
Bare
surface IrrigationOutfield FenceWarning TrackPitching Mound (Elevated)DugoutsBackstopLightingParkingSpectator Seating Equipent StorageField Condition
(1‐3)
Components
Condition
(1‐3)
Neighborhood Park
Heritage Park 1 1 1 No 1 1 1 2 3 Determined when built
Kennydale Lions Park 1 rarely 1 Yes 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 3
Kiwanis Park 111 Yes 1 1 1 1 11 2 2
Maplewood Park 1 1 Minimal 1 1 Benches 1 1 2 2 Restrooms
Philip Arnold Park 111 Yes 1 1 1 1111 1 2
Thomas Teasdale Park 1 1 1 Yes 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2
Tiffany Park 1 1 Minimal 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 Condition
Subtotal Neighborhood Park 0007470 6 7 0 0 0 7001 5 71560
Community Park
Cedar River Park 111 Yes 1 1 1 1 11 1 2
Highlands Park and Neighborhood Center 1 1 1 1 Yes 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2
Liberty Park Big Liberty 1 1 1 Yes 1 1111 1 11111 2 2
Grandstand
Little Liberty 1 1 1 Yes 1 1 1 11111 1 2
Ron Regis Park Soccer Field 1 11 Yes 1 1 111 2 2
Baseball Field 1 1 1 Yes 1 1 1 1 1 11111 2 2
Multi 1 (Cricket)1 1 Yes 1 Yes‐Pitch 1 11 2
Temporary Cricket
Multi 2 1 1 1 Yes 1 1 12 2
Subtotal Community Park 4104870 8 7 1 6221 5 53866
TOTAL ALL PARKS 4 1 0 11 12 14 0 14 14 0 0 1 13 2 2 2 10 12 4 13 12 6
The following indicate the criteria used to evaluate field and component condition:
Fields:
1 = poor drainage, uneven surface, frequent wear spots, no base, rough graded
2 = adequate drainage, moderate base, reasonably level playing surface, few wear spots
3 = irrigated, good quality base and surface, well graded and level, minimal wear spots
Components:
1 = components due for replacement, limited functionality
2 = components adequate: average quality, may be dated but are still functional
3 = good quality or new components
Notes
Field Type User Field Surface Field Components Condition
If not programmed,
or minimally
programmed,
indicate reason
Renton_ParkInventory 111819
A.3 - Field Inventory
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
184 | CITY OF RENTON
APPENDIX A: PARK AND FACILITY INVENTORY
This page intentionally left blank
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
B
DECISION MAKING TOOLS
APPENDIX
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
186 | CITY OF RENTON
APPENDIX B
TOOLS FOR DECISION MAKING
This appendix introduces four tools used to assist in decision making during the development of the Parks,
Recreation and Natural Areas Plan. These tools will also assist in Plan implementation. The tools draw on
analysis of the park system guided by the project committees and informed by the community.
These tools are developed with the understanding that Renton will have a wide variety of projects to
complete to achieve the vision of the Plan. Some projects were identified during the planning process while
others will arise during the implementation of the plan. These tools will assist staff, the Parks Commission
and elected officials in making the difficult decisions about which projects should move forward first. Four
tools are described below.
1. Design Guidelines:
This tool updates and expands prior plan descriptions of what should, what could and what should
not be included in the development of each park type. This tool also helps to make decisions about
the size and location for future parks. Design guidelines deal with the physical features of a park.
The management, maintenance and operations of the sites are addressed separately.
2. Natural Area Evaluation Tool:
This tool utilizes a systematic approach to prioritizing and managing these areas. The first step is
to inventory the City’s natural areas. The approach then recommends moving the natural area into
stabilization, at which point the natural area is no longer deteriorating, and then improvement, and
gradually, restoration. The inventory process and prioritization criteria included in this tool will help
the City decide which natural areas to focus on first for natural area plan development.
3. Prioritization Criteria:
The wide range of projects, from natural area enhancement to new STEM programming to a new
play feature, require a set of criteria that evaluate how a specific project relates to the plan vision.
Scoring a project against these criteria allows for the sorting of disparate projects into an ordered
list that focuses community resources. The scoring criteria intentionally avoids the question of
funding, focusing instead on the projects that most directly address the vision and leaving funding
availability as an over-arching discussion in the implementation portion of the plan.
4. Capital And Operations Cost Model:
This tool facilitates cost figure development for the capital and operations of park sites. The costs
are based on the existing recreation amenities and additional features in the project list. These
recommended projects come from the community’s ideas (as well as previously identified projects)
filtered and added to during the Needs Assessment. The discussion of the decision making tools
will also help refine this list as ideas are tested and design guidelines are agreed on. To develop a
“planning level” idea of the costs associated with these projects a series of assumptions need to
be reviewed. The development of this tool begins with identifying the major cost drivers of park
development, adding features, maintaining and operating parks in Renton.
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 187
DECISION MAKING TOOLS
1. DESIGN GUIDELINES
Intent
These guidelines provide direction for the development and modification of City of Renton parks. For
each of the six park classifications the guidelines describe the purpose of the park type along with the
features that are appropriate to that purpose. The City of Renton recognizes that development must
comply with local, state and federal regulations that may result in conflicts with the guidelines presented
in this document. In such a case, the final design of any facility must comply with the existing regulatory
requirements. In addition, some parks and facilities that are currently owned and managed by the City
may not meet these design guidelines. Parks and facilities that do not meet these guidelines have been
provisionally classified into the closest park category.
The intent of the design guidelines is to:
• Uphold the City of Renton Comprehensive Plan;
• Protect and enhance the City’s quality of life and community identity;
• Encourage functional, safe and aesthetically pleasing development while maintaining compatibility
with the surrounding environment; and
• Ensure the distribution of park facilities and experiences are consistent with the Parks, Recreation
and Natural Areas Plan.
Organization
The guidelines are organized by park classification. For each park classification, there are five design
guidelines categories:
• Size and Access: The size of a park, and particularly the developable area, determines the
type of park and uses possible at the site. Access addresses the frontages, preferred modes of
transportation and entrances to the site.
• Recommended Resources: There is a minimum set of park resources needed for a park location
to meet the objectives developed from community input and analyzed in the Community Needs
Chapter. Items listed in this sub-heading are intended to be required elements for the given park
classification.
• Potential Additional Resources: The park resources identified in this sub-heading are additional
resources for consideration. If site size allows, other resources can be incorporated into the park as
long as the impacts of the resource do not exceed the capacity of the size and scale of the intended
park site classification.
• Structures: If a structure is identified for the park site, additional review and standards will
come into play. This section also identifies the non-recreation structures that need additional
consideration before being located within park sites.
• Incompatible Resources: In some cases, there are park resources that conflict with the purpose and
character of a particular park classification.
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
188 | CITY OF RENTON
APPENDIX B
Neighborhood Parks
INTENT
Provide close-to-home recreation opportunities for
nearby residents, who typically live within walking
and bicycling distance (.25-.5 miles) of the park in
a residential setting. Incorporate Crime Prevention
Through Environmental Design (CPTED) design
principles.
SIZE AND ACCESS
• Minimum developable park size: 2 acres
• Property faces front facades of adjacent
development
• Access from local street or trail
RECOMMENDED RESOURCES
• Children’s play area
• At least one picnic table, one bench and grill
• Internal pathway system
• Perimeter path or sidewalks
• Open turf area
• Trees (for shade and to preserve urban
canopy cover)
• Park identification sign
• Site furnishings (trash receptacles, bike rack,
etc.)
POTENTIAL ADDITIONAL RESOURCES
• Youth sport fields
• Sport courts
• Other small-scale active recreation resources
(skate spot, horseshoe pits, etc.)
• Natural areas
• Water
• Court lights
• Limited off street parking
• Community garden
• Shelter, shade structure or gazebo
• Pedestrian-scale lighting
• Lights
• Kiosks
• Signage
• Public art or historic element
COMPATIBLE BUILDINGS
• Restroom
• Other small building
• Buildings and immediate landscaping should
follow Low Impact Development practices
• Buildings constructed within parks should be
built to LEED Silver standard or better
INCOMPATIBLE RESOURCES
• Destination facilities or resources with
community wide draw
• Sport field lighting
• Sport field complexes
• Full-service recreation centers
• Swimming pools (indoor or outdoor)
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 189
DECISION MAKING TOOLS
Community Parks
INTENT
Provide opportunities for active recreation and
organized play in a location that can accommodate
increased traffic and demand, while also serving
the neighborhood park function for nearby
residents. Incorporate Crime Prevention Through
Environmental Design (CPTED) design principles.
SIZE AND ACCESS
• Minimum developable park size: 10 acres
• Access from a higher order public street on
at least one side for main park entry
• Main park entry should front a street with
transit or bicycle route when applicable
• Secondary access to the park from a public
local access street or trail preferred
RECOMMENDED RESOURCES
• Children’s play area, medium to large-scale
• Picnic tables, benches and grills
• Enclosed or open picnic shelter with grill
(capacity of 40-100)
• Pathway system connecting internal park
facilities
• Youth and Adult sports fields (minimum of 2)
• Sports court
• Permanent restrooms
• Off-street parking
• Open turf area for sitting and informal play
• Trees (for shade and to preserve urban
canopy cover)
• Park identification sign
• Site furnishings (trash receptacles, bike rack,
etc.)
• Water
POTENTIAL ADDITIONAL RESOURCES
• Swimming pools/aquatic facilities
• Spray park
• Sports complex
• Community garden
• Upgraded utility service to support special
events
• Water access
• Skatepark, BMX park
• Flower beds
• Off-leash dog area
• Natural areas
• Public art or historic element
• Field, court or pedestrian lights
• Trails
• Skate spots, bocce court, etc.
• Kiosks
• Signage
COMPATIBLE BUILDINGS
• Community building
• Special facilities such as a boathouse,
theater or interpretive center
• Maintenance/storage facilities
• Restrooms (preferably integrated into other
buildings)
• Concession
• Buildings and immediate landscaping should
follow Low Impact Development practices
• Buildings constructed within parks should be
built to LEED Silver standard or better
INCOMPATIBLE RESOURCES
• Regional-scale facilities (arboretum,
botanical garden, regional sports complex)
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
190 | CITY OF RENTON
APPENDIX B
Regional Parks
INTENT
Provide destination park locations that can
accommodate communitywide and regional traffic
and demand, while also fulfilling the function of
a community and neighborhood park for nearby
residents. Incorporate Crime Prevention Through
Environmental Design (CPTED) design principles.
SIZE AND ACCESS
• Minimum developable park size: 50 acres
• Access from a higher order public street on
at least one side for main park entry
• Park may have multiple main entries which
should front a street with transit or bicycle
route when possible
• Secondary access points to the park
from a public local access street or trail is
encouraged
RECOMMENDED RESOURCES
• Regional-scale facilities or resources with a
regional draw
• Children’s play area with unique features
themed to reflect site character
• Picnic tables, benches, and grills
• Multiple enclosed or open picnic shelters
with grill (capacity of 40-100)
• Pathway system connecting site amenities
• Site furnishings (trash receptacles, bike rack,
etc.)
• Water
• Infrastructure to support large community
events
• Restrooms
• Off-street parking
• Large open turf area for events, sitting and
informal play
• Trees (for shade and to preserve urban
canopy cover)
• Park identification sign
• Pedestrian lighting
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 191
DECISION MAKING TOOLS
POTENTIAL ADDITIONAL RESOURCES
• Swimming pools/aquatic facilities
• Spray park
• Individual sports fields (baseball, cricket,
football, rugby, soccer, softball, multi-
purpose)
• Regional sports complex
• Community garden
• Off-leash dog area
• Natural areas
• Public art or memorials
• Field or court lighting
• Flower beds
• Upgraded utility service to support special
events
• Stage/amphitheater
• Trails
• Public art or historic element
• Wayfinding and interpretive signage
• Specialized sport courts (tennis court, sand
volleyball, handball)
• Water access (boat ramp, docks)
• Kiosks
• Signage
COMPATIBLE BUILDINGS
• Concessions, including restaurants
• Rentable event venues
• Community Building
• Maintenance facilities
• Unique or regional scale special facilities
such as a regional aquatics center, water
sports center or interpretive center
• Buildings and immediate landscaping should
follow Low Impact Development practices
• Buildings constructed within parks should be
built to LEED Silver standard or better
INCOMPATIBLE RESOURCES
• No conflicting resources identified
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
192 | CITY OF RENTON
APPENDIX B
Special Use Parks
INTENT
Provide space for unique features or places that
create variety in the park system but cannot be
accommodated within other park sites due to
size or location requirements. Incorporate Crime
Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED)
design principles.
SIZE AND ACCESS
• Size depends on the type of use proposed
• Access from a higher order public street on
at least one side for main park entry
• Main park entry should front a street with
transit or bicycle route when applicable
• Access may be limited during certain times
of the day or to specific recreation activities
RECOMMENDED RESOURCES
• Special use resource or facility
• Internal pathway system
• Park identification sign
• Site furnishings (trash receptacles, bike rack,
etc.)
POTENTIAL ADDITIONAL RESOURCES
• Parking
• Water
• Lighting
• Public art or historic element
• Trails
• Kiosk
• Signage
• Sports courts
• Children’s play areas
• Picnic shelters
COMPATIBLE BUILDINGS
• Restrooms
• Interpretive facilities
• Programmable spaces
• Community Building
• Rentable spaces
• Unique facilities that do not fit in other parks
in the system
• Buildings and immediate landscaping should
follow Low Impact Development practices
• Buildings constructed within parks should be
built to LEED Silver standard or better
INCOMPATIBLE RESOURCES
• Any resource that would conflict with the
intended special purpose of the park
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 193
DECISION MAKING TOOLS
Natural Area Park
INTENT
Provide opportunities for users to interact with
nature locally or protect natural resources and
systems within the standards of the existing natural
resource regulatory environment. Incorporate Crime
Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED)
design principles.
SIZE AND ACCESS
• Size of the natural area is variable,
depending primarily on the extent of the
natural resource being protected.
• Access is dependent on size of property and
type of natural area. Generally natural areas
should have at least one identified entrance
accessible from a public street.
• Public access may be limited or excluded if
the natural resource is deemed too fragile
for interaction. However, maintenance
access should be provided via trail or service
road.
RECOMMENDED RESOURCES
• Park identification sign
• Site furnishings (trash receptacles, bike rack,
etc.)
• Internal pathway system (if feasible)
POTENTIAL ADDITIONAL RESOURCES
Natural area parks with developable portions could
incorporate elements of neighborhood, community
and special use parks and corridors.
• Kiosk
• Signage
• Trail head and trail
• Water access
• Off-street parking (if site is accessible)
INCOMPATIBLE RESOURCES
Conflicting resources will depend on the character
and quality of the natural area.
If available, refer to the relevant natural area
management plan for this site for additional
guidance on the appropriate character and uses
with the natural area.
COMPATIBLE BUILDINGS
• Restroom
• Interpretive center
• Buildings and immediate landscaping should
follow Low Impact Development practices
• Buildings constructed within parks should be
built to LEED Silver standard or better
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
194 | CITY OF RENTON
APPENDIX B
Corridor
INTENT
Narrow swaths of land that serve as connections
between parks or to other destinations. Lands can
include public land, private partnerships and/or
easements. A corridor site can be the location of a
trail or can provide a habitat linkage between two
larger areas.
SIZE AND ACCESS
• Size is dependent on corridor length
and right-of-way or easement width and
connectivity
RECOMMENDED RESOURCES
• Corridor identification signage
• Site furnishings (trash receptacles, bike rack,
etc.)
POTENTIAL ADDITIONAL RESOURCES
• Trailhead
• Information kiosk
• Interpretive signage
• Off-street parking
COMPATIBLE BUILDINGS
• Restroom
• Generally, corridors are not compatible with
larger buildings due to their relatively small
sites
INCOMPATIBLE RESOURCES
• Any resource that conflicts with linkage
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 195
DECISION MAKING TOOLS
Parks, Natural Areas and Infrastructure
INTENT
The desired result is reducing the amount of land reserved for the exclusive use of infrastructure and
maximizing recreational value by combining community benefits of infrastructure investment with the
recreational benefits of park land.
DEFINITIONS
Grey Infrastructure: The physical framework of the city, commonly thought of as the system of streets,
pipes, facilities, bridges, towers and power lines that provide essential services.
Green Infrastructure: Natural systems that perform some of the same essential services such as cleaning
water, and retaining stormwater run-off as well as many additional functions such as cleaning the air,
cooling our streets and processing and storing carbon that would otherwise contribute to atmospheric
warming. Green infrastructure is often thought of in terms of multifunctional green infrastructure, where
one piece of land or natural system can provide multiple benefits to the community. Green Infrastructure
can exist in natural forms or be engineered for a particular purpose.
INFRASTRUCTURE IN PARKS AND NATURAL AREAS
The following considerations are critical to understanding how infrastructure can be integrated into park
sites and natural areas:
• Infrastructure designed and scaled for serving park/natural area needs should be allowed.
• Additional capacity for needed or existing pipes, lines or facilities where the footprint within the site
remains the same as necessary for park services.
• Encourage the addition of green infrastructure designed to beautify areas that are not required for
the primary functions of a park or to enhance the capacity of systems within natural areas.
• Consider green or grey infrastructure that substitutes for standard elements (such as pervious
paving or reinforced turf substituting for traditional parking lot paving).
• Incorporate any additional maintenance requirements for infrastructure, to be paid for by the
appropriate utility fund, into the project budget impacts.
• If facilities such as pump stations are included, they should be designed to add to the park
experience through interpretation of the system or by including needed features such as restrooms.
• In natural areas consult the relevant management plan, if any, for more specifics about compatible
infrastructure uses.
• Avoid any infrastructure that interferes with the primary purpose or character of a park site.
• Carefully locate vaults, towers or other structures that could impact park user safety, displace
existing park amenities (unless adequately replaced) or interfere with planned expansion of a park
or feature.
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
196 | CITY OF RENTON
APPENDIX B
PARK AND NATURAL AREA FEATURES IN INFRASTRUCTURE SITES
Recreation and natural features can be added to existing and new sites that are primarily intended
for infrastructure. If there is adequate developable area meeting the appropriate design guidelines,
infrastructure sites can serve as neighborhood or community parks. Infrastructure sites of any size can be
considered natural area parks if they contribute to protecting a natural resource or provide an opportunity
to interact with nature:
• Detention basins or other facilities should be designed to expand park opportunities when not in
use or at full capacity.
• Access to existing or new infrastructure sites (such as detention basins) or utility easements (such
as power, water or sewer lines) should be pursued for expanded trail opportunities, creating habitat
linkages and create local recreational and natural experiences.
• In areas lacking local park access, consider underground reservoirs or other required infrastructure
designed to accommodate recreation facilities above.
• Constructing, protecting or restoring habitat areas, (such as nesting platforms on utility poles or
natural resource enhancement in watershed recharge areas) particularly where public access is
limited by the infrastructure function of the site.
• Within infrastructure sites the issue of compliance with the existing regulatory framework is a
critical consideration as many additional jurisdictions may come into play. Projects that become
delayed or sidelined by safety or other access concerns at infrastructure sites could continue to be
considered for the future, as the regulations and practices are slowly shifting toward shared use of
facilities.
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 197
DECISION MAKING TOOLS
2. NATURAL AREA EVALUATION TOOL
This tool will support the community and City staff in gradually improving stewardship of Renton’s natural
areas. When urban natural areas like those in Renton, are left untended, they are usually not stable, healthy
ecosystems. Without management and intervention, these natural areas are likely to be on a long-term
trajectory of deterioration that is difficult to notice unless actively monitored by experienced naturalists. This
tool utilizes a systematic approach to prioritizing and managing these areas, beginning with inventories and
moving into stabilization, at which point the natural area is no longer deteriorating, and then improvement,
and gradually, restoration. The prioritization criteria will help the City decide which natural areas to focus on
first for management plan development.
Inventory Natural Areas
Inventory each natural area. This initial inventory is a higher-level view and includes a walk-through by an
experienced naturalist making field notes and taking photos. Collect the following information:
i. Date and name of person conducting inventory
ii. Size of area in acres
iii. Ownership (In some cases sites may be managed by the city but owned by others.)
iv. Identify critical areas and regulated shoreline
v. Specify ecosystem type, for example: upland forest, riparian forest, wetland, other.
vi. Presence and percent cover of each invasive species, which include non-native species that are
likely to cause harm to the ecosystem. (Percent can be generalized but must be specific to each
species.)
vii. Condition rating: rate condition on a 5-point scale with 1 being poor and 5 being great, based on
percent native plant cover.
viii. Note and identify any rare plant communities or rare animal or plant species present and indicate
locations on a map.
ix. Landscape ecology or context: relationship to rivers, creeks, lakes, wetland systems, natural area
corridors, or other habitats.
x. Main threats or risks: these can include invasive weeds, encroachment by adjacent property
owners, erosion, fire, etc.
xi. Indicate access points, trailheads or parking areas associated with the sites.
xii. Assign Management Level
Define management tasks using the minimal-stabilize-improve-restore continuum. For all sites, maintenance
is required and is shown as the final column in the continuum matrix.
Table B.1 summarizes the management continuum, with intensity of management increasing left to right. The
investment of time and money into management increases left to right until reaching the last column on the
right, maintain. The assumption is that once natural areas have been restored, the level of effort to maintain
them will be lower than that of the restoration work.
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
198 | CITY OF RENTON
APPENDIX B
INVESTMENT $$$$$$$$$$$$
MANAGEMENT MINIMAL STABILIZE*IMPROVE RESTORE MAINTAIN
ISSUE:
Safety • Inventory/baseline
• Maintain trails,
trailheads, parking
areas
• Vegetation
management,
including pruning
level 1 trees
• Remove hazard
trees
• Address homeless
camps
• Maintain signage
• Maintain
boundaries –
fences, gates
• Trash, litter
removal
• Identify & treat
hazards
• Address homeless
camps
• Enforcement
of park rules –
signage, patrols
• Access control
– repair/replace
fences, gates
• Trash, litter
removal
• Reduce fuel
ladders
• Create fire
breaks
• Maintain low
fire risk edges
• Identify
sanctioned
trails; remove
volunteer trails
• Add directional,
info signage
• Stormwater –
erosion control
BMPs
• Create/maintain
low fire risk
communities in
strategic locations
• Increase user
frequency with
marketing of
sanctioned trails
to deter unwanted
activities
• Add interpretive
signage
• Same activities
as ‘Minimal’
• Anticipate
hazards and
schedule
preventative
maintenance
• Establish goals
and objectives
Invasive
Species
• Inventory/baseline
• Periodic/irregular
• Partner driven
• Identify and treat
invasives to stop
spread
• Focus on high risk
species
• Enforcement
of land use
restrictions
• Partner driven
• Reduce %
invasive plants
• Implement
Early Detection
Rapid Response
program (EDRR)
• Public education
• Reach 80% native
plant cover
• Continue EDRR
• Annual monitoring
& treatment of all
natural areas for at
least 5 years
• Same activities
as ‘Minimal’
with lower
frequency
• Establish goals
and objectives
Table B.1: Management Continuum
MAINTAINRESTOREIMPROVESTABILIZE
Natural Area Management Continuum
Increasing Habitat Quality
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 199
DECISION MAKING TOOLS
INVESTMENT $$$$$$$$$$$$
MANAGEMENT MINIMAL STABILIZE*IMPROVE RESTORE MAINTAIN
ISSUE:
Native
Species
• Inventory/baseline
• Periodic planting
• Partner driven
• Protect best areas
• Plant disturbed or
treated areas
• Enforcement
of land use
restrictions
• Expand planting
to replace
invasives
• Public education
• Add missing
elements
associated a with
the ecosystem that
aren’t present
• Consider
succession,
corridors
• Add interpretive
signage
• Monitor
growth &
succession
• Establish goals
and objectives
Practices • Best Management
Practices
• Mitigation
• Partner driven
• Some volunteers
• Enforcement
of land use
restrictions
• Invasive plant
management
• Identify and treat
hazards
• Trail and vegetation
maintenance
• Native plant
management
• Selective tree
removal
• Planting
• Signage
• Tree density
management
• Invasive removal
• Planting
• Stormwater –
erosion control
BMPs
• Same
• Establish goals
and objectives;
evaluate
effectiveness
• Schedule
preventative
maintenance
Wildlife • Inventory/baseline
• Volunteer
monitoring
• Partner driven
• Trap/remove
invasive wildlife
• Identify and treat
hazards
• Habitat
improvements,
enhancements
i.e. nest boxes,
snags, down
wood
• Public education
• Release extirpated
species to
appropriate
habitats
• Monitor
• Establish goals
and objectives
• Anticipate
hazards and
schedule
preventative
maintenance
Monitoring
& Adaptive
Management
• Inventory/baseline
• None
• Regularly monitor
and remove
invasive species
• Create Desired
Future
Condition
(DFC)** for
each natural
area
• Monitor and
adapt
• Monitor and adapt
• Update DFCs
• Monitor and
adapt
• Establish goals
and objectives;
evaluate
effectiveness
• Update DFCs
* Stabilization is the point at which a natural area is no longer deteriorating
** The term DFC means “Desired Future Condition.” This term is used in natural resource management to provide a sense of
direction, usually over a long period of time (20 years or more). For example, a DFC for a mixed 60-year-old woodland might
be to achieve “old growth forest conditions” at some future time, with intermediate stages identified along the way.
Table B.1: Management Continuum (continued)
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
200 | CITY OF RENTON
APPENDIX B
Prioritize Sites
Prioritization criteria can help the City allocate its resources
judiciously and efficiently. The following are objective, easily
measured criteria. Each item is given a score of 1 (low) to
5 (high). Those natural areas with the highest scores are
prioritized over those with lower scores for establishing and
implementing a Management Plan.
Table B.2: Prioritization Criteria
CRITERIA POINT SCALE
1 POINT 2 POINTS 3 POINTS 4 POINTS 5 POINTS
Habitat condition: based
on percent native plant
cover.
Poor condition
<30% native
cover
Between 30-50%
native cover
Moderate
condition
between 50-70%
native cover
70-90% native
cover
Excellent
condition >90%
native cover
Connectivity & size:
includes both size in acres
and how well connected
the site is to other natural
areas. Connectivity can
be direct, or as part of a
“stepping stone” network
of habitats (see figure B.1).
Site is isolated
from other
natural areas
Adjacent to a
small habitat or
proximity to a
cluster of 2 or
more habitats
not separated
by impassible
barriers
Adjacent to or
existing as a
medium sized
habitat (10-20
acres) or in
close proximity
(within 1/3 mile)
to a connecting
corridor
Adjacent to or
existing as a
medium/large
sized habitat
(20-30 acres),
anchor habitat
or connecting
corridor
Adjacent to or
existing as a
large habitat
(>30 acres),
anchor habitat
or major
connecting
corridor
Public support/
partnership: based on
the existing level of
community or partnership
involvement.
No current or
little potential
for activity
Moderate-
low volunteer
activity
An identified
interest group/
potential
partner, such as
a friends group,
or occasional
volunteer
activity
Active public
support group
or partnership
or regular
volunteer
activity
Active public
support group
or partnership
and regular
volunteer
activity
Environmental education:
environmental education
or interpretation programs
or potential.
Sites with
no existing
programs or low
potential for
programming/
interpretation
Moderate-low
program usage
Periodic
program or
potential for
programming/
interpretation
Regular,
seasonal
environmental
education or
interpretation
programs
Regular,
year-round
environmental
education or
interpretation
programs
Habitat types: Prioritize
rare and unique habitat
types
Highly impacted
habitat (i.e.
clearcut)
Degraded
habitats with
remnant natural
feature such as
stand of native
trees or shrubs
or man-made
mitigation site
Protected
riparian
corridors
Emergent
or forested
wetlands, young
upland forest
Locally rare
habitat types
(i.e., mature
forest)
Figure B.1: Habitat Connectivity Diagram
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 201
DECISION MAKING TOOLS
CRITERIA POINT SCALE
1 POINT 2 POINTS 3 POINTS 4 POINTS 5 POINTS
Rare species: more points
for sites that contain rare
or listed plant or animal
species (i.e. salmon,
eagles).
Rare species are
unlikely to be on
site
Suitable habitat
for rare species
(size, structure,
cover)
Suspected
presence of rare
species (based
on unconfirmed
but credible
community
reports)
Confirmed
presence of
locally rare
species or
species of
interest
Confirmed
presence of
wildlife species
listed as
endangered,
threatened, or
sensitive by a
state or federal
agency
Public use: more points
for sites with well used,
sanctioned trails or
facilities and high levels
of use.
Low use sites Moderate-low
use sites
Moderate use
sites
Moderate-high
use sites
High use sites
Water resource: more
points for natural areas
connected to a water
resource
No water
resources are
on the site,
but absence
of impervious
area helps
groundwater
recharge
Presence of
isolated, year-
round pond
Seasonal creek
or in-stream
pond
Presence
of seasonal
pond or minor
perennial creek
Presence of
fish bearing,
perennial or
otherwise major
creek
Return on previous or
potential investment:
more points for sites
that had previously been
invested in (i.e. restoration
projects, mitigation
banks).
Low level of
return
Moderate-low
level of return
Moderate level
of return
Moderate-high
level of return
High level of
return
Threats: more points if
lack of action would result
in near term risk to public
safety or habitats.
Areas where
neglect would
result in a
potential
future threat
to ecosystems
or public
safety beyond
foreseeable
future (>15
years)
Areas where
neglect would
result in a
potential
future threat to
ecosystems or
public safety (7-
15 years)
Areas where
neglect would
result in a mid-
term threat to
ecosystems or
public safety
(5-7 years)
Areas where
neglect would
result in a near-
term threat
(2-5 years) to
ecosystems or
public safety
Areas where
neglect would
result in an
immediate
threat to
ecosystems
(erosion, habitat
loss) or public
safety (i.e., fire)
Staff judgment: allowance
for staff to add points
based on their experience
of site.
0-5 points for otherwise unaccounted for benefits or advantages of acquiring a site. May be
applied if staff expertise determines that criteria should be more heavily weighted.
Watershed benefit:
more points for sites
that could have a wider
watershed benefit beyond
the immediate property
boundaries.
Site or proposed
activity has very
localized benefit
Site or proposed
activity has
modest benefit
beyond property
boundaries
Site or proposed
activity has
moderate
benefit beyond
property
boundaries
Site or proposed
activity has
large benefit
beyond property
boundaries
Site or proposed
activity has
significant
benefit beyond
property
boundaries
Table B.2: Prioritization Criteria (continued)
Figure B.1: Habitat Connectivity Diagram
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
202 | CITY OF RENTON
APPENDIX B
3. PRIORITIZATION CRITERIA
The set of criteria in this document will assist the Department in making decisions about which projects and
programs should move forward first in alignment with the community values and vision. The criteria focuses
on the vision and the types of projects that will be required to achieve it. The additional screen of potential
and actual funding will be applied to the prioritized project list (and reapplied as the funding situation will
change year-to-year). This will allow the funding options to focus on high priority projects.
Application of Criteria
Table B.3 provides details of the scoring. Fewer points indicate that a project is less likely to meet the
criterion, while greater points indicate that the project is more likely to meet the criterion. After analyzing
the project against the criteria, projects can then be compared to the current list of projects competing for
City resources based on the total points.
POINTS DESCRIPTION
0 Does not meet criterion or is not
applicable.
1 Has potential to meet criterion
2 Minimally meets criterion
3 Basically meets criterion
4 Mostly meets criterion
5 Greatly meets criterion
As new projects and programs are brought before the City the prioritization criteria can be applied. By
adopting this practice the City would be assessing it’s projects and programs on an ongoing basis, so
anytime there are new proposals a critical assessment can be made for later benchmarking.
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 203
DECISION MAKING TOOLS
Table B.3: Prioritization Criteria Scoring
Prioritization Criteria: Projects or programs advance the community values and vision of
Renton if they:0-5
Advance programming objectives: Project or program supports recreation programming key
outcomes.
• Does the project contribute to available space for recreation programming?
• Does the project improve flexibility in providing a variety of recreation programming?
• Does the project or program adapt to new demographics and trends in recreation?
• Does the project or program support environmental education or nature interpretation?
• Does the project or program facilitate gatherings and bringing the community together?
Fulfill multiple planning objectives: Project or program is aligned with other adopted
planning efforts of the City of Renton, King County or other aligned jurisdictions.
• Does the project or program advance the goals of previous planning efforts by the City?
• Does the project or program support regional planning objectives?
• Does the project or program support the vision for the Parks, Recreation and Natural
Areas Plan?
Fill identified gaps in service: Project or program adds or improves park sites, recreation
facilities, natural areas or recreation programs to fulfill an unmet need.
• Does the project or program fill a geographic gap identified in the 2019 geographic
analysis?
• Does the project or program fulfill an unmet need identified in this Plan?
• Is the project responsive to community demand?
Enhance partnerships or volunteerism: Project or program creates new partnerships or
strengthens existing partnerships.
• Does the project or program incorporate cost-sharing, joint development or
programmatic collaborations?
• Does the project or program involve volunteers in planning, construction or
programming?
• Does the project include a friends group or other resources for ongoing stewardship of
the improvements?
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
204 | CITY OF RENTON
APPENDIX B
Prioritization Criteria: Projects or programs advance the community values and vision of
Renton if they:0-5
Enhance (or improves use of) existing facilities: Project or program makes the best possible
use of the existing investments in land and facilities.
• Does the project or program have enough interest or drawing power to increase
recreational use of the location?
• Does the project or program work in tandem with other City project work (i.e. trail
development or maintenance during other utility maintenance projects)
• Does the project develop or provide access to existing property the City has invested
resources in purchasing?
• Does the project enhance safety through design improvements or activation?
Contribute to system sustainability: Project or program contributes to the long-term
environmental and financial sustainability of the system.
• Does the project or program stabilize, enhance or restore habitat or other ecological
functions?
• Does the project or program encourage stewardship of the City’s natural systems and
recreation areas through hands-on interaction or education?
• Does the program or project provide a direct return on the investment of community
resources?
• Does the program or project have indirect financial impacts such as economic
development or tourism spending?
• Have long-term maintenance resources been identified for the project or program?
Strengthen identity: Project or program celebrates the unique features of Renton’s
neighborhoods or the city as a whole.
• Does the project or program celebrate cultural, ethnic or historical elements of Renton
through art or interpretation?
• Is the project associated with the Cedar River or Lake Washington (two natural features
the community identifies with)?
• Is the project or program associated with the Cedar River salmon run?
• Does the project or program enhance the sense of Renton as a unique place (such as
community gateways) or create a place where the community comes together?
Table B.3: Prioritization Criteria Scoring
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 205
DECISION MAKING TOOLS
EXAMPLE PROJECTS
Following the scoring of all projects, a prioritized list has been created by sorting projects based on total
scores. Further sorting of the project list could include project type (such as acquisition, development
or renovation) or by park type. This allows projects to be highlighted based on funding applicability. It is
important to note that all projects identified in this plan are important to achieving the vision and even
those that score low do advance the system toward the plan vision.
Prioritization Criteria
Project Advances Programming ObjectivesMultiple Planning ObjectivesFills Identified Gaps in ServiceEnhances partnerships or volunteerismEnhances (or Improves Use of) Existing FacilitiesContributes to System SustainabilityStrengthens IdentityTotal
Score Range 0-5 0-5 0-5 0-5 0-5 0-5 0-5
N.A.R.CO Property 5 5 5 3 5 5 5 33
Cedar River Park 5 5 3 2 5 4 5 29
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
206 | CITY OF RENTON
APPENDIX B
This page intentionally left blank
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 207
DECISION MAKING TOOLS
4. CAPITAL AND OPERATIONS COST MODEL
The cost of improvements at a park (and at the system-wide level) is an important consideration as the plan
moves from this decision making stage into implementation planning. Critical cost considerations include
both one-time capital costs and ongoing operations and maintenance costs. This tool will allow broad
“planning level” costs to be identified based on the improvements recommended in the plan. The model is
a flexible excel document that allows both the major improvements and cost assumptions to be modified
to adjust for changing project decisions or refined cost figures. In addition to providing a snap-shot of the
total costs the model can be used to create alternate scenarios, different packages of projects that result in
different investments in the park system. It is important to understand the function of the model (including
the assumptions) and how to modify it.
Site Acreage
The first input in the model is the current and proposed site acreage. These values are used to calculate per-
acre costs of improvements based on existing acres, new acres or the total future size of a site.
Major Project Types
Six categories of projects were identified to reflect the major types of enhancements that are needed in
Renton’s Parks and Natural Areas. In this model, an “X” indicates that the project type has been selected for
the park in the same row. The planning cost assumptions for each of these are either per site or per acre
and vary based on the category of park. A matrix showing the cost assumptions for each major project type
and park category is included at the end of this appendix. These costs were developed based on Renton’s
current expenditures and the experience of the planning team:
Planning and Design: An allocation for a variety of possible planning and design needs, from site
master planning to natural resource inventory and management plans. This allocation includes planning
documents only, construction documents would be part of the development or renovation cost. Extensive
environmental or survey work would require additional funds.
Acquisition: New land required to build or expand the site. The basis for this value is an average of property
recently sold in Renton. The cost value is calculated based on the difference between the existing acres and
proposed acres indicated in the model.
Development: Ground-up development of a new site from vacant land or the complete redevelopment
of an existing site. This per-acre amount is based on Renton park development projects and other recent
experience of the planning team. This cost includes construction documents.
Renovation: Major enhancement or rebuilding of a set of existing features at a site. Renovation may or may
not require stripping the site to bare ground but would involve substantial investment (estimated at 40% of
the cost of development).
“Improve” or “Restore” Stewardship Projects: The projects required in natural areas (or natural sections
of otherwise developed parks) to improve or restore the natural systems and reduce the required effort to
a maintenance level. As laid out in the Natural Area Assessment Tool, improving includes reducing invasive
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
208 | CITY OF RENTON
APPENDIX B
species and enhancing habitat over a 5-year period. Fully restoring may require multiple 5-year windows of
work.
Major Maintenance and Reinvestment: Most sites in the system will require maintenance and
reinvestment beyond the general operating costs over the 20-year timeline of this plan. This will include
replacement of individual features such as playgrounds, trail/pathway repairs, roof replacements etc. The
cost of these investments is estimated at 25% of the development cost.
Facilities
Following these major categories are individual features that represent a significant capital investment in
the site. Each of these facilities has an associated cost assumption. In addition to the identified items, space
is left for “other” items that are generally one-off or unique to the site.
Operations Costs
Basic Maintenance: The starting point for operations cost is a per-acre cost for basic tasks such as mowing
and garbage collection. For Natural Areas, the cost is intended to cover the “Minimal” and “Stabilize”
management efforts described in the Natural Area Evaluation Tool, as well as the cost of maintaining the
restored system.
Other Operating Costs: Immediately adjacent to the “other” capital items is a space to recognize extra
operational cost for future facilities. These are often, but not always, tied to unique features in the site.
CAPITAL COST OPERATING
COSTS
Per Site Per Acre Per Acre Per Acre Per Acre Per Acre Per Acre
Planning and DesignAcquisitionDevelopmentRenovation"Improve" or "Restore" Stewardship ProjectsMajor Maintenance and ReinvestmentBasic MaintenanceNEIGHBORHOOD
PARK $250,000 $450,000 $250,000 $100,000 $5,000 $62,500 $7,500
COMMUNITY
PARK $450,000 $450,000 $200,000 $80,000 $5,000 $50,000 $12,000
REGIONAL PARK $600,000 $450,000 $200,000 $80,000 $5,000 $50,000 $15,000
SPECIAL USE $250,000 $450,000 $200,000 $80,000 $5,000 $50,000 $7,500
NATURAL AREA $150,000 $100,000 $40,000 $0 $5,000 $10,000 $500
CORRIDOR $50,000 $200,000 $100,000 $5,000 $5,000 $25,000 $2,000
FACILITY $250,000 $450,000 $200,000 $80,000 $5,000 $50,000 $7,500
TRAIL $50,000 $200,000 $100,000 $40,000 $5,000 $25,000 $2,000
Table B.4: Cost Assumptions
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 209
DECISION MAKING TOOLS
CAPITAL COSTS NOTES
PLAY AREA
Small $350,000 Each, includes areas for tots and school age play. Range between $150 and
$350,000. Higher end represents addition of accessible safety surfacing.
Large $1,000,000 Each, includes more specialized and custom equipment, areas for tots and
school age play. Range between $750,000 and $1,000,000
Destination As specified Unique, large-scale play area offering different play experiences, such as
universally accessible or water play
PICNIC SHELTER
Small $175,000 Each (4 Tables)
Large $500,000 Each (20 Tables)
Multi-Purpose Trail $1,000,000 Per Mile, 10-16' paved path with gravel shoulders. Improvements required
may include curb and gutter, curb ramps, drainage infrastructure adjustments
and installations and minimal power pole relocation.
Soft-surface Trail $100,000 Per Mile, includes some remediation in natural areas.
SPORTS FIELDS
Multi-Purpose $500,000 Each, natural turf field with basic drainage/prep and features
With Artificial Turf and Lights $3,000,000 Each, based on similar projects in RCO grant database
Sports Courts $75,000 Each, cost built based on either a tennis or basketball court
PARK BUILDINGS
Interpretive Center $2,000,000 Small, new building
Multi-Generational Center $10,000,000 Next generation of community facility, slightly larger than existing
neighborhood center
Restroom $600,000 Each, assumes utilities in place.
Other As Specified Major capital costs that are unique to the site
Capital Cost Inflation 5%Inflation Factor for projection
OPERATIONS COSTS NOTES
Basic Maintenance See basic maintenance cost by park category in the table on page 208
Bonuses Additional operations allocations for facilities that increase overall costs.
Sports Field $25,000 Each
Restroom $35,000 Each
Picnic Shelter $5,000 Each
Recreation Staffing FTE $150,000 Per FTE/year (fully loaded).
Small Building 3 $600,000 Each category includes the cost of staff, facilities maintenance and utilities.
Medium Building 8 $1,496,000
Large Building 12 $2,187,000
Other As Specified Other operating costs for major unique facilities
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
210 | CITY OF RENTON
APPENDIX B
Existing Features: The final portion of the input section of the model is a summary of existing features that
have operations implications in the model. Existing Sport Fields, Restrooms, Picnic Shelters and existing
buildings are all assigned an additional “bonus” of operation resources reflecting of their impact on the
system. There is also an “other” existing operations input here to capture major expenses such as the
aquatic center that are unique in the system.
RESULTS
The next section of the model includes the results of the capital and operating cost calculations. For Total
Capital Cost per-acre and per-site costs of the selected major project categories are added to the per-unit
costs of other selected features. The total is then projected forward based on an inflation factor (currently
set at 5%) to illustrate the cost of the individual projects (and totals) 5, 10 and 20 years into the future.
It is important to note that this model does not include capital or operating costs that may result from
partnership projects.
Operating costs are calculated based on a per-acre basic maintenance cost and added to the relevant
bonuses for existing and future operations-heavy facilities. This cost is split between the operating costs of
existing features and those added to the system by new parks and features. The total operating cost is the
sum of these two, removing any duplication of facilities that are being replaced.
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
C
PROJECT LIST AND COST MODEL
APPENDIX
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
212 | CITY OF RENTON
This page intentionally left blank
APPENDIx C: PROJECT LIST AND COST MODELRESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 213
APPENDIX C: PROJECT LIST AND COST MODELTable_C-1 Ranked Cost Model
Priority #Project Project Description Total Score Total Capital Cost
Total Capital Cost
Projection
5 Years
Total Capital Cost
Projection
10 Years
Total Capital Cost
Projection
20 Years
Total Existing Annual
Operating Cost
(2019 Dollars)
Total Proposed Annual
Operating Cost (2019
Dollars)
Total Operating Cost
(Existing + Proposed
2019 Dollars)
1
N.A.R.CO Property Develop according to design guidelines and Riverside: Tri Park Concept Plan to include artificial turf soccer
fields, relocated trail, parking, picnic facilities, play area, restrooms, bike park/bmx/pump track and climbing
wall. Park included in the Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8 and the Cedar River Basin Plan. Capital
improvements and major maintenance as needed.
33
23,646,000$ 31,688,000$ 38,517,000$ 62,740,000$ 289,200$ 170,000$ 459,200$
2
Cedar River Park Existing major building facilities include RCC and Carco Theatre. Enclose lap pool at Henry Moses Aquatic
Center, potential field reconfiguration. Redevelop elements as shown on the revised Riverside: Tri Park
Concept Plan. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. Also included in the Shoreline
Master Program, WRIA 8 and the Cedar River Basin Plan.
29
16,248,000$ 21,774,000$ 26,466,000$ 43,110,000$ 4,529,200$ 1,000,000$ 5,529,200$
3
May Creek Greenway Complete site inventory and management plan, acquire additional land along creek corridor, install soft
surface trail, trailhead(s), creek crossings and partner with Newcastle and King County. Included in the
Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8 and the May Creek Basin Plan.
28
5,700,000$ 7,639,000$ 9,285,000$ 15,124,000$ 22,100$ 4,900$ 27,000$
4
Highlands Park and Neighborhood
Center
Re-develop according to design guidelines using concept plan as a reference. Existing property is inefficient
as configured. Located within the larger Sunset Planned Action EIS area. Capital improvements and major
maintenance as needed.
27
15,400,000$ 20,637,000$ 25,084,000$ 40,859,000$ 1,710,600$ 60,000$ 1,770,600$
4
May Creek Park Develop park according to design guidelines (parking, picnic, play area, hard surface court, open turf area,
restrooms, trail connections) using concept plan as a reference, create/implement management plan
addressing wetlands. Potential acquisition to increase park usability.
27
9,830,000$ 13,173,000$ 16,012,000$ 26,082,000$ 124,500$ 65,500$ 190,000$
4 Sam Chastain Waterfront Trail Construct the planned waterfront trail and park area, connecting the end of the existing water walk at the
Cedar River Boathouse to the existing paved path at the south end of Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park.27 6,050,000$ 8,108,000$ 9,855,000$ 16,053,000$ -$ -$ -$
5
Black River Riparian Forest Develop according to design guidelines using concept plan as a reference, complete site
inventory/management plan, implement management plan. Location of Lake to Sound Trail constructed and
maintained by King County (shown as regional trail connection on the concept plan). Site is in the Shoreline
Master Program, WRIA 9, Green/Duwamish Watershed Management Plan and the Black River Water Quality
Management Plan.
26
7,862,000$ 10,536,000$ 12,807,000$ 20,861,000$ 46,700$ 600,000$ 646,700$
5
Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park Maintain and enhance facility for non-motorized boating, acquire land for additional parking, expand
technology, renovate S. beach restrooms & bathhouse. Replace parking lots, irrigation, swim beach
promenade and rosewall/bulkhead. High level of ongoing reinvestment due to intensive use. Planned park
bond improvements include multiple major replacement projects. Included in the City Center Plan, Shoreline
Master Program and WRIA 8, Eastrail is located adjacent to the East park boundary. Capital improvements
and major maintenance as needed.
26
7,824,000$ 10,485,000$ 12,745,000$ 20,760,000$ 1,002,000$ 15,000$ 1,017,000$
5
Liberty Park Re-develop according to design standards and the Riverside: Tri-Park Concept Plan. Improve ballfields in the
short term (for example levelling). Repurpose Community Building for environmental learning. Included in
the City Center Plan, Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8 and the Cedar River Basin Plan. Capital
improvements and major maintenance as needed.
26
7,825,000$ 10,486,000$ 12,746,000$ 20,762,000$ 252,200$ 600,000$ 852,200$
5
Piazza, Gateway and former Big 5 site Re-master plan for future park development. Redevelopment of the Piazza Gateway park site and former Big
5 lot should include a plaza and other complementary outdoor spaces allowing activities to extend beyond
the existing park, creating a civic center. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. Included
in the City Center Plan and the Downtown Civic Core Vision and Action Plan.
26
5,650,000$ 7,572,000$ 9,204,000$ 14,992,000$ 9,000$ 3,000$ 12,000$
5
Ron Regis Park Improve existing and undeveloped fields (with natural turf); extend water service to the park; add a
permanent restroom, playground, and picnic area(s). Park included in the Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8
and the Cedar River Basin Plan. Potential for habitat improvements to stabilize shoreline. Capital
improvements and major maintenance as needed.
26
10,343,000$ 13,861,000$ 16,848,000$ 27,444,000$ 656,100$ 85,000$ 741,100$
6
Cedar River Natural Area Complete site inventory and management plan, implement management plan. Included in the Shoreline
Master Program, WRIA 8, Cedar River Basin Plan. Continue to acquire properties as they become available. 25
3,281,000$ 4,397,000$ 5,345,000$ 8,706,000$ 132,100$ -$ 132,100$
6
Cleveland Richardson Property Develop park according to design guidelines using concept plan as a reference, create and implement
management plan. 25
10,537,000$ 14,120,000$ 17,163,000$ 27,957,000$ 178,500$ 65,000$ 243,500$
6
North Highlands Park and
Neighborhood Center
Re-master plan park and redevelop neighborhood building for multi-generational use. Potential for
partnerships. Located within the larger Sunset Planned Action EIS area. Capital improvements and major
maintenance as needed.
25
2,673,000$ 3,582,000$ 4,354,000$ 7,092,000$ 1,550,500$ -$ 1,550,500$
6
Tiffany Park Renovate according to design guidelines using concept plan as a reference. Expand to connect to Cascade
Park. Potentially repurpose and expand neighborhood building for environmental learning as shown on
concept plan. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.25
4,372,000$ 5,859,000$ 7,122,000$ 11,601,000$ 110,300$ -$ 110,300$
Renton_Cost_Model_010720 1
C.1 - Ranked Project List and Cost Model
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
214 | CITY OF RENTON
APPENDIX C: PROJECT LIST AND COST MODEL
This page intentionally left blank
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 215
APPENDIX C: PROJECT LIST AND COST MODELTable_C-1 Ranked Cost Model
Priority #Project Project Description Total Score Total Capital Cost
Total Capital Cost
Projection
5 Years
Total Capital Cost
Projection
10 Years
Total Capital Cost
Projection
20 Years
Total Existing Annual
Operating Cost
(2019 Dollars)
Total Proposed Annual
Operating Cost (2019
Dollars)
Total Operating Cost
(Existing + Proposed
2019 Dollars)
7
Edlund Property Develop park according to design guidelines using concept plan as a reference, create and implement
management plan addressing wetland. Continue acquistions to make connection to the Panther Creek
Wetland.
24
10,739,000$ 14,391,000$ 17,492,000$ 28,493,000$ 133,100$ 66,900$ 200,000$
7 Kenyon Dobson Park Develop interpretive/education center, trailhead, parking, restrooms.24 3,725,000$ 4,992,000$ 6,068,000$ 9,884,000$ 14,300$ 600,000$ 614,300$
8
Burnett Linear Park*Included in the Renton Downtown Civic Core Vision and Action Plan and the City Center Plan. Improvements
identify expanding park to the north (Renton Connector). Reconfigure existing parking lot between 4th and
5th. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.
23
885,000$ 1,187,000$ 1,443,000$ 2,350,000$ 8,300$ 6,700$ 15,000$
8
Honey Creek Greenway Complete site inventory and management plan, implement management plan. Develop soft surface trail.
Located in the Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8 and the May Creek Basin Plan. Continue to acquire
properties as they become available.
23
2,615,000$ 3,504,000$ 4,259,000$ 6,937,000$ 21,500$ -$ 21,500$
8 Trail Expansion & Development Trail connection projects from the Trails and Bicycle Master Plan that are connected to parks and natural
areas.23 50,000$ 67,000$ 81,000$ 132,000$ -$ -$ -$
9 Boeing EIS Waterfront Park A new park with lakefront access as noted in the Boeing Comprehensive Plan Amendment EIS dated
10/21/03.22 19,350,000$ 25,931,000$ 31,519,000$ 51,341,000$ -$ 1,125,000$ 1,125,000$
9 Sports Complex Acquire, plan and develop a 4 field (or more) sports complex to centralize competitive play.22 24,050,000$ 32,229,000$ 39,175,000$ 63,812,000$ -$ 282,500$ 282,500$
10
Cedar River Trail Park Invasive species removal, add utilities for Cedar River Boathouse. Included in City Center Plan, Shoreline
Master Program, WRIA 8 and the Cedar River Basin Plan. Planned connection to future Sam Chastain
Waterfront Trail. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.21
2,039,000$ 2,732,000$ 3,321,000$ 5,410,000$ 221,200$ -$ 221,200$
10 Panther Creek/Edlund Property Included in Edlund Property concept plan. Develop a management plan. Acquire land and easements as
needed to connect to the Panther Creek Wetlands.21 55,000$ 74,000$ 90,000$ 147,000$ 1,800$ -$ 1,800$
11 Panther Creek Wetlands Complete site inventory and management plan, acquire additional land along creek corridor. Create
pedestrian trails and boardwalk system. Managed by Surface Water Utility.20 4,960,000$ 6,647,000$ 8,079,000$ 13,160,000$ 69,600$ -$ 69,600$
11
Philip Arnold Park Potential partnership with neighboring landowner (currently Puget Sound Energy) to enhance usability and
access. Improve ballfield and multipurpose field. Renovate or remove neighborhood building and restrooms.
Included in the City Center Plan. Planned park bond improvements include: relocate playground, improve
ADA accessibility, refurbish picnic areas, refurbish basketball court surround, refurbish parking lot, add
lighting and a loop trail. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.
20
4,179,000$ 5,600,000$ 6,807,000$ 11,088,000$ 183,300$ 5,000$ 188,300$
11
Senior Activity Center Property Potentially expand for multi-generational center. Included in the City Center Plan, Shoreline Master Program,
WRIA 8 and the Cedar River Basin Plan. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.20
140,000$ 188,000$ 229,000$ 373,000$ 1,552,000$ -$ 1,552,000$
11 Corridor Acquisition Acquire or secure new properties providing important linkages between parks and natural areas. Included in
the City Center Plan and the Trails and Bicycle Master Plan.20 6,000,000$ 8,041,000$ 9,774,000$ 15,921,000$ -$ 40,000$ 40,000$
11 Trailheads and Parking Identify and develop appropriate access points to natural areas.20 50,000$ 67,000$ 81,000$ 132,000$ -$ -$ -$
12
City Center Neighborhood Park 1 Develop neighborhood park amenities at existing Senior Activity Center site after phasing out existing
maintenance buildings, which will require acquisition of a new site. Included in the City Center Plan,
Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8 and the Cedar River Basin Plan. 19
5,488,000$ 7,354,000$ 8,939,000$ 14,561,000$ 21,000$ 81,500$ 102,500$
12
Jones Park Shoreline stabilization. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. Included in the City Center
Plan and Downtown Civic Core Vision and Action Plan. Adjacent trail corridor adds enough size to serve as a
full neighborhood park. Park in the Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8 and Cedar River Basin Plan.19
1,017,000$ 1,363,000$ 1,657,000$ 2,699,000$ 43,000$ -$ 43,000$
12
Kiwanis Park Potential acquisition to expand park to increase usability. Bond improvements include: improving field and
installing ADA access from Union Avenue, renovating or removing neighborhood building, replacing
playground and renovating hard surface courts and parking, and adding picnic plaza. Capital improvements
and major maintenance as needed.
19
2,838,000$ 3,803,000$ 4,623,000$ 7,530,000$ 127,500$ 5,000$ 132,500$
12 Sunset Neighborhood Park Final phase contruction to be completed in 2020. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.19 200,000$ 268,000$ 326,000$ 531,000$ 64,000$ -$ 64,000$
12 Thomas Teasdale Park Improve outfield drainage. Potential re-purpose of neighborhood building. Renovate existing ballfield to
create all-abilities ballfield. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.19 3,420,000$ 4,583,000$ 5,571,000$ 9,075,000$ 137,500$ -$ 137,500$
13 Renton Wetlands Continue to manage as required by Mitigation Banking Agreements. Portion managed by Surface Water
Utility. Included in the Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 9, Green/Duwamish Watershed Plan.18 430,000$ 576,000$ 700,000$ 1,140,000$ 69,600$ -$ 69,600$
14 East Plateau Community Park Acquire site from King County and re-develop according to design guidelines using concept plan as a
reference. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.17 14,675,000$ 19,666,000$ 23,904,000$ 38,937,000$ -$ 605,000$ 605,000$
14
Kennydale Lions Park Renovate according to design guidelines using concept plan as a reference. Park acreage is not fully
developed and current configuration of facilities limits usage. Renovate existing neighborhood building.
Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.
17
2,994,000$ 4,012,000$ 4,877,000$ 7,944,000$ 41,300$ 40,000$ 81,300$
Renton_Cost_Model_010720 2
C.1 - Ranked Project List and Cost Model
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
216 | CITY OF RENTON
APPENDIX C: PROJECT LIST AND COST MODEL
This page intentionally left blank
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 217
APPENDIX C: PROJECT LIST AND COST MODELTable_C-1 Ranked Cost Model
Priority #Project Project Description Total Score Total Capital Cost
Total Capital Cost
Projection
5 Years
Total Capital Cost
Projection
10 Years
Total Capital Cost
Projection
20 Years
Total Existing Annual
Operating Cost
(2019 Dollars)
Total Proposed Annual
Operating Cost (2019
Dollars)
Total Operating Cost
(Existing + Proposed
2019 Dollars)
14 Non-motorized Boating Facility Acquire land, develop and/or develop partnerships for a non-motorized boating facility. Enhance existing non-
motorized boating facility.17 3,250,000$ 4,355,000$ 5,294,000$ 8,623,000$ -$ -$ -$
15 Parkwood South Div #3 Park*Acquire adjacent land to bring this site up to minimum size of 2 acres of developable land; master plan and
develop a neighborhood park according to design guidelines.16 448,000$ 601,000$ 731,000$ 1,191,000$ 4,300$ 200$ 4,500$
15 Community Gardens Acquire land and/or develop additional community gardens through partnerships, potentially as part of new
neighborhood or community parks.16 760,000$ 1,018,000$ 1,237,000$ 2,015,000$ -$ 2,300$ 2,300$
16
Cascade Park Renovate according to design guildelines using the concept plan as a reference. Expand park to connect
Cascade Park to Tiffany Park, improve road access and increase visibility. Potential for off leash area within
park. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.
15
6,161,000$ 8,256,000$ 10,035,000$ 16,346,000$ 83,300$ 69,500$ 152,800$
16 Earlington Park*Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.15 206,000$ 276,000$ 335,000$ 546,000$ 11,300$ -$ 11,300$
16
Kennydale Beach Park*Reconfigure dock for improved life guarding, renovate restroom/lifeguard facility. Acquire land to enhance
usability. Park included in the Shoreline Master Program and WRIA 8, Eastrail is located adjacent to the East
park boundary. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.
15
896,000$ 1,201,000$ 1,460,000$ 2,378,000$ 85,600$ 5,300$ 90,900$
16 Wayfinding and Informational Signage Design and implement wayfinding and park signage throughout the parks, recreation and natural areas
system and install information kiosks and trailhead signage at key points in the trail system.15 650,000$ 872,000$ 1,060,000$ 1,727,000$ -$ -$ -$
17
Maplewood Golf Course Continue to maintain and operate, acquire property as it becomes available. See adopted Master Plan,
included in the Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8, and the Cedar River Basin Plan. Capital and operations
costs are outside of the Community Services budget, within an enterprise fund. Capital Improvements and
major maintenance as needed.
14
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
17
SE 186th Place Properties*Undersized and surrounded by private property; potential for community garden, tree nursery or play area
to serve local residents. If not used for neighborhood park functions, replace with an additional park east of
SR 515.
14
1,250,000$ 1,675,000$ 2,036,000$ 3,316,000$ 4,500$ -$ 4,500$
17 Soos Creek Greenway:
Boulevard Lane
A portion of the King County owned Soos Creek Greenway, within the Renton City Limits. This neighborhood
park may be transferred to the City and rennovated. This park includes a substantial natural area.14 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 227,300$ 227,300$
17
Talbot Hill Reservoir Park Renovate site with features that differentiate it from nearby Thomas Teasedale Park. Potentially add loop
walk and picnic area. Refurbish tennis and pickleball courts. Capital improvements and major maintenance as
needed.
14
673,000$ 902,000$ 1,096,000$ 1,785,000$ 19,500$ -$ 19,500$
17 Windsor Hills Park Potential acquisitions to enhance park usability and visibility from street. Redevelop according to design
guideline and concept plan. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.14 3,635,000$ 4,871,000$ 5,921,000$ 9,645,000$ 34,800$ 16,400$ 51,200$
17 Benson Neighborhood Park 1 Acquire and develop one neighborhood park east of S Benson Rd and north of SE Puget Drive.14 6,838,000$ 9,163,000$ 11,138,000$ 18,143,000$ -$ 102,500$ 102,500$
17 Benson Neighborhood Park 2 Acquire and develop one neighborhood park west of SR 515 around SE 192nd Street.14 6,838,000$ 9,163,000$ 11,138,000$ 18,143,000$ -$ 102,500$ 102,500$
18 East Plateau Neighborhood Park 1 Acquire and develop a neighborhood park south of Sunset Boulevard and east of Duvall.13 6,838,000$ 9,163,000$ 11,138,000$ 18,143,000$ -$ 102,500$ 102,500$
18 East Plateau Neighborhood Park 2 Acquire and develop a neighborhood park north of SE 128th Street.13 6,838,000$ 9,163,000$ 11,138,000$ 18,143,000$ -$ 102,500$ 102,500$
18 Highlands Neighborhood Park 1 Acquire and develop a neighborhood park north of Sunset Boulevard, west of Duvall.13 6,838,000$ 9,163,000$ 11,138,000$ 18,143,000$ -$ 102,500$ 102,500$
18 Highlands Neighborhood Park 2 Acquire and develop a neighborhood park south of NE 3rd Street.13 6,838,000$ 9,163,000$ 11,138,000$ 18,143,000$ -$ 102,500$ 102,500$
18 Kennydale Neighborhood Park 1 Acquire and develop a neighborhood park west of I-405.13 6,838,000$ 9,163,000$ 11,138,000$ 18,143,000$ -$ 102,500$ 102,500$
18 Kennydale Neighborhood Park 2 Acquire and develop a neighborhood park east of I-405 and north of the May Creek Greenway.13 6,838,000$ 9,163,000$ 11,138,000$ 18,143,000$ -$ 102,500$ 102,500$
18 West Hills Neighborhood Park Acquire and develop one neighborhood park north of Renton Avenue. 13 6,838,000$ 9,163,000$ 11,138,000$ 18,143,000$ -$ 102,500$ 102,500$
18
Cedar River Trail Corridor Secure ownership of remaining railbanked corridor land between the trestle bridge and Ron Regis Park, also
the remaining corridor near I-405, include acquired land in the surrounding parks and natural areas; maintain
corridor as a regional trail linkage.
13
2,903,000$ 3,890,000$ 4,728,000$ 7,701,000$ 35,000$ 25,800$ 60,800$
18
Community Garden/Greenhouse Continue to maintain and operate, expand garden. Potential to be larger neighborhood Park - Planning and
acquisition included in City Center Neighborhood Park 1. Included in the City Center Plan, Shoreline Master
Program, WRIA 8, and the Cedar River Basin Plan.
13
30,000$ 40,000$ 49,000$ 80,000$ 4,500$ -$ 4,500$
18 Dog Parks Acquire land, develop and/or develop partnerships for off-leash areas in four neighborhood or community
parks or other locations.13 1,030,000$ 1,381,000$ 1,679,000$ 2,735,000$ 60,000$ 17,500$ 77,500$
19 Soos Creek Greenway: Renton Park A portion of the King County owned Soos Creek Greenway, within the Renton City Limits. This property may
be transferred to the City once Soos Creek Trail is complete.12 -$ -$ -$ -$ 35,000$ 9,300$ 44,300$
20 Riverview Park Park in Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8 and the Cedar River Basin Plan. Capital improvements and major
maintenance as needed.11 465,000$ 623,000$ 757,000$ 1,233,000$ 133,000$ -$ 133,000$
21 Lake Street Open Space Potential trailhead. Acquire easements as neccesary to connect to Panther Creek Wetlands.10 3,000$ 4,000$ 5,000$ 8,000$ 200$ -$ 200$
21 Tonkin Park Redevelop per Downtown Civic Core Vision and Action Plan. Capital improvements and major maintenance
as needed. Included in the City Center Plan. 10 183,000$ 245,000$ 298,000$ 485,000$ 1,200$ 5,000$ 6,200$
Renton_Cost_Model_010720 3
C.1 - Ranked Project List and Cost Model
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
218 | CITY OF RENTON
APPENDIX C: PROJECT LIST AND COST MODEL
This page intentionally left blank
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 219
APPENDIX C: PROJECT LIST AND COST MODELTable_C-1 Ranked Cost Model
Priority #Project Project Description Total Score Total Capital Cost
Total Capital Cost
Projection
5 Years
Total Capital Cost
Projection
10 Years
Total Capital Cost
Projection
20 Years
Total Existing Annual
Operating Cost
(2019 Dollars)
Total Proposed Annual
Operating Cost (2019
Dollars)
Total Operating Cost
(Existing + Proposed
2019 Dollars)
22 Skate Parks Develop new skate park within a community park.9 600,000$ 804,000$ 977,000$ 1,591,000$ -$ -$ -$
23 Maplewood Park Renovate or remove restrooms. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.8 573,000$ 768,000$ 934,000$ 1,521,000$ 44,900$ -$ 44,900$
23 Veterans Memorial Park Tile refurbishment. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. Included in the City Center
Plan.8 11,000$ 15,000$ 18,000$ 29,000$ 1,700$ -$ 1,700$
24 Glencoe Park*Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.7 31,000$ 42,000$ 51,000$ 83,000$ 3,800$ -$ 3,800$
24 Heritage Park Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.7 573,000$ 768,000$ 934,000$ 1,521,000$ 133,800$ -$ 133,800$
24 Maplewood Roadside Park Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. Included in the Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8
and the Cedar River Basin Plan.7 54,000$ 72,000$ 88,000$ 143,000$ 8,100$ -$ 8,100$
25 Springbrook Watershed Managed by Water Utility, not accessible to the public. Capital and operations costs are outside of
Community Services budget.6 -$ -$ -$ 26,100$ -$ 26,100$
26 Sit In Park Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. Included in the City Center Plan. Included in
Downtown Civic Core.3 25,000$ 34,000$ 41,000$ 67,000$ 3,700$ -$ 3,700$
TOTAL 333,092,000$ 446,372,000$ 542,574,000$ 883,796,000$ 14,056,300$ 6,827,100$ 20,883,400$
Note: Operating Cost totals remove double counting of replaced facilities. Totals do not include improvements to School District facilities that may result from new partnership opportunities.
* Parks that have been provisionally classified even though they do not meet minimum size or other design guidelines
**Boeing EIS Waterfront Park development would only occur if the Boeing Company surplused the Renton facilities.
Renton_Cost_Model_010720 4
C.1 - Ranked Project List and Cost Model
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
220 | CITY OF RENTON
APPENDIX C: PROJECT LIST AND COST MODEL
This page intentionally left blank
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 221
APPENDIX C: PROJECT LIST AND COST MODELTable_C-2 Cost Model Support
Priority #Project Park Type Project Type Current AcresProposed AcresPlanning and DesignAcquisitionDevelopmentRenovationStewardship ProjectsMajor Maintenance and ReinvestmentAdditional Play Area - SmallAdditional Play Area - LargeAdditional Picnic Shelter - SmallAdditional Picnic Shelter - LargeAdditional Multi-Purpose Trails (Miles) Additional Soft-Surface Trails (Miles) Additional Multi Purpose Sport FieldAdditional Sport Field with Artificial Turf/LightsAdditional Sport CourtsAdditional RestroomNew BuildingOther Major Additional CapitalDescription Other Environmental/PermittingOther
Environmental/Permitting
Description Other Additional OperationsDescription: Additional
Operations Existing Sport Fields (Total)Total RestroomsExisting Picnic SheltersExisting BuildingExisting Other Major Operations Maintenance CostsOther Operation Costs Explanation1 N.A.R.CO Property COMMUNITY PARK EXISTING 24.1 24.1 X X X X 1 1 0.8 4 2 2,200,000$
Grant buy-back for Open
Space Funds, BMX/Pump
Track, field maintenance
building
0 0 0
2 Cedar River Park COMMUNITY PARK EXISTING 20.6 20.6 X X X X 1 8,000,000$
Aquatic center expansion,
community center expansion,
redevelopment per concept
plan
1,000,000$
Expanded pool
operations,
redevelopment per
concept plan
1 2 0 Large 2,000,000$ Pool
3 May Creek Greenway NATURAL AREA EXISTING 44.2 54.0 X X X X X 1.5 100,000$ Environmental studies
and mitigation
0 0 0
4 Highlands Park and Neighborhood
Center COMMUNITY PARK EXISTING 10.8 10.8 X X X 1 1 1.0 1 4 1 8,350,000$ Skate area and new
community center
2 1 0 Medium
4 May Creek Park NEIGHBORHOOD PARK EXISTING
UNDEVELOPED 16.6 20.0 X X X X X 2 1 0.5 0.5 1 1 100,000$ Environmental studies
and mitigation
0 0 0
4 Sam Chastain Waterfront Trail CORRIDOR FUTURE PARK 0.0 0.0 X X X 6,000,000$ Over water trail
0 0 0
5 Black River Riparian Forest NATURAL AREA EXISTING
UNDEVELOPED 93.3 93.3 X X X X X 0.3 0.3 Interpretive
Center 250,000$ Environmental studies
and mitigation
0 0 0
5 Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park REGIONAL PARK EXISTING 51.3 52.3 X X X X 50,000$ Environmental permitting
and mitigation
0 4 4 72,000$ 5000
hours of
Lifeguards
5 Liberty Park COMMUNITY PARK EXISTING 10.6 10.6 X X X 1 5 Interpretive
Center 2,000,000$ Skate park, rennovated
building, dog park
2 2 1
5 Piazza, Gateway and former Big 5 site SPECIAL USE EXISTING 1.2 1.6 X X X 5,000,000$ Re-master plan and redevelop
full site
0 0 0
5 Ron Regis Park COMMUNITY PARK EXISTING 43.4 43.4 X X X X 1 2 1.0 3 1 1,000,000$ Install lighting 100,000$ Environmental permitting
and mitigation
4 1 0
6 Cedar River Natural Area NATURAL AREA EXISTING 264.2 264.2 X X X X 2.0 25,000$ Environmental studies
and mitigation
0 0 0
6 Cleveland Richardson Property NEIGHBORHOOD PARK EXISTING
UNDEVELOPED 23.8 23.8 X X X X 1 1 1.0 1 1 500,000$ Farmhouse repurposing 200,000$ Environmental studies
and mitigation
0 0 0
6 North Highlands Park and
Neighborhood Center NEIGHBORHOOD PARK EXISTING 2.6 2.6 X X X 1 1,000,000$
Redevelop neighborhood
building for multi-generational
use
0 1 0 Medium
6 Tiffany Park NEIGHBORHOOD PARK EXISTING 6.7 6.7 X X X X X 1 1.0 750,000$ Potentially repurpose and
expand neighborhood building 125,000$ Environmental permitting
and mitigation
1 1 0
7 Edlund Property NEIGHBORHOOD PARK EXISTING
UNDEVELOPED 17.7 20.0 X X X X X 1 3 1.0 1 1,000,000$ Barn and bridge restoration 150,000$ Environmental studies
and mitigation
0 0 0
7 Kenyon Dobson Park NEIGHBORHOOD PARK EXISTING
UNDEVELOPED 1.9 1.9 X X 1.0 Interpretive
Center Trailhead, parking
0 0 0
8 Burnett Linear Park*NEIGHBORHOOD PARK EXISTING 1.1 2.0 X X X X
0 0 0
8 Honey Creek Greenway NATURAL AREA EXISTING 43.0 43.0 X X X X X 1.0 0 0 0
8 Trail Expansion & Development TRAIL FUTURE PARK X X X X 0 0
9 Boeing EIS Waterfront Park REGIONAL PARK FUTURE PARK 0.0 75.0 X X X 0 0 0
9 Sports Complex FACILITY FUTURE PARK 0.0 15.0 X X X 1 1 4 2 0 0 0
10 Cedar River Trail Park COMMUNITY PARK EXISTING 15.1 15.1 X X X
0 1 1
10 Panther Creek/Edlund Property NATURAL AREA EXISTING 3.7 3.7 X X X
0 0 0
11 Panther Creek Wetlands NATURAL AREA EXISTING 69.1 69.1 X X X X 1.5 200,000$ Environmental studies
and mitigation
0 1 0
11 Philip Arnold Park NEIGHBORHOOD PARK EXISTING 11.1 11.1 X X X 1 1 1.0 1 Renovate or remove
neighborhood building
1 2 1
11 Senior Activity Center Property SPECIAL USE EXISTING 2.8 2.8 X 0 1 0 Medium
11 Corridor Acquisition CORRIDOR FUTURE PARK 0.0 20.0 X X 0 0 0
11 Trailheads and Parking TRAIL FUTURE PARK X X X 0 0 0
Renton_Cost_Model_010720 5
C.2 - Cost Model Support Material
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
222 | CITY OF RENTON
APPENDIX C: PROJECT LIST AND COST MODEL
This page intentionally left blank
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 223
APPENDIX C: PROJECT LIST AND COST MODELTable_C-2 Cost Model Support
Priority #Project Park Type Project Type Current AcresProposed AcresPlanning and DesignAcquisitionDevelopmentRenovationStewardship ProjectsMajor Maintenance and ReinvestmentAdditional Play Area - SmallAdditional Play Area - LargeAdditional Picnic Shelter - SmallAdditional Picnic Shelter - LargeAdditional Multi-Purpose Trails (Miles) Additional Soft-Surface Trails (Miles) Additional Multi Purpose Sport FieldAdditional Sport Field with Artificial Turf/LightsAdditional Sport CourtsAdditional RestroomNew BuildingOther Major Additional CapitalDescription Other Environmental/PermittingOther
Environmental/Permitting
Description Other Additional OperationsDescription: Additional
Operations Existing Sport Fields (Total)Total RestroomsExisting Picnic SheltersExisting BuildingExisting Other Major Operations Maintenance CostsOther Operation Costs Explanation12 City Center Neighborhood Park 1 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK EXISTING
UNDEVELOPED 2.8 5.0 X X X 1 1 1.0 1 2 1 900,000$
Acquire new site for
maintenance buildings (2
acres)
0 0 0
12 Jones Park NEIGHBORHOOD PARK EXISTING 1.1 1.1 X X 0.3 300,000$ Cedar River Trail design and
construction 100,000$ Environmental studies
and mitigation
0 1 0
12 Kiwanis Park NEIGHBORHOOD PARK EXISTING 9.0 9.0 X X X 1 1 1 Renovate or remove
neighborhood building
1 1 0
12 Sunset Neighborhood Park NEIGHBORHOOD PARK EXISTING 3.2 3.2 X 0 1 1
12 Thomas Teasdale Park NEIGHBORHOOD PARK EXISTING 9.7 9.7 X X X 1 1,000,000$
Improve with all-abilities
sport field; repurpose
neighborhood building
1 1 1
13 Renton Wetlands NATURAL AREA EXISTING 139.2 139.2 x 0.3 0.3 100,000$ Environmental studies
and mitigation
0 0 0
14 East Plateau Community Park COMMUNITY PARK FUTURE PARK 0.0 42.5 X X X 1 2 2.0 2 2 1
0 0 0
14 Kennydale Lions Park NEIGHBORHOOD PARK EXISTING 5.5 5.5 X X X 1 1.0 1 1
0 0 0
14 Non-motorized Boating Facility FACILITY FUTURE PARK X X 3,000,000$ Non-motorized boat facility Assume operation by
partners
0 0 0
15 Parkwood South Div #3 Park*NEIGHBORHOOD PARK EXISTING
UNDEVELOPED 0.6 0.6 X X X X 0 0 0
15 Community Gardens FACILITY FUTURE PARK 0.0 0.3 X X X X 300,000$ 15,000 sf raised beds 0 0 0
16 Cascade Park NEIGHBORHOOD PARK EXISTING 11.1 15.7 X X X X 1.0 1 150,000$ Dog park 0 0 0
16 Earlington Park*NEIGHBORHOOD PARK EXISTING 1.5 1.5 X X 0 0 0
16 Kennydale Beach Park*NEIGHBORHOOD PARK EXISTING 1.3 2.0 X X X X 80,000$ Environmental studies
and mitigation
0 1 0 41,000$ 3,000
hours of
Lifeguards
16 Wayfinding and Informational Signage FACILITY FUTURE PARK 0.0 0.0 X X 400,000$ Signage installation 0 0 0
17 Maplewood Golf Course SPECIAL USE EXISTING 192.3 192.3
0 0 0
17 SE 186th Place Properties*NEIGHBORHOOD PARK EXISTING
UNDEVELOPED 0.6 0.6 X X 1 0.5 0 0 0
17 Soos Creek Greenway:
Boulevard Lane NEIGHBORHOOD PARK FUTURE PARK 0.0 30.3 0 0 0
17 Talbot Hill Reservoir Park NEIGHBORHOOD PARK EXISTING 2.6 2.6 X X X 0 0 0
17 Windsor Hills Park NEIGHBORHOOD PARK EXISTING 4.6 5.5 X X X X 2 2 200,000$ Dog park with agility area 30,000$ Environmental permitting
and mitigation
0 0 0
17 Benson Neighborhood Park 1 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK FUTURE PARK 0.0 5.0 X X X X 1 1 1.0 1 2 1 0 0 0
17 Benson Neighborhood Park 2 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK FUTURE PARK 0.0 5.0 X X X X 1 1 1.0 1 2 1 0 0 0
18 East Plateau Neighborhood Park 1 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK FUTURE PARK 0.0 5.0 X X X X 1 1 1.0 1 2 1 0 0 0
18 East Plateau Neighborhood Park 2 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK FUTURE PARK 0.0 5.0 X X X X 1 1 1.0 1 2 1 0 0 0
18 Highlands Neighborhood Park 1 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK FUTURE PARK 0.0 5.0 X X X X 1 1 1.0 1 2 1 0 0 0
18 Highlands Neighborhood Park 2 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK FUTURE PARK 0.0 5.0 X X X X 1 1 1.0 1 2 1 0 0 0
18 Kennydale Neighborhood Park 1 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK FUTURE PARK 0.0 5.0 X X X X 1 1 1.0 1 2 1 0 0 0
18 Kennydale Neighborhood Park 2 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK FUTURE PARK 0.0 5.0 X X X X 1 1 1.0 1 2 1 0 0 0
18 West Hills Neighborhood Park NEIGHBORHOOD PARK FUTURE PARK 0.0 5.0 X X X X 1 1 1.0 1 2 1 0 0 0
18 Cedar River Trail Corridor CORRIDOR EXISTING 0.0 12.9 X X 0 1 0
18 Community Garden/Greenhouse SPECIAL USE EXISTING 0.6 0.6 X 0 0 0
18 Dog Parks FACILITY FUTURE PARK 0.0 1.0 X X X X 80,000$ Per facility 10,000$ Additional
Maintenance
1 1 0
19 Soos Creek Greenway: Renton Park NATURAL AREA FUTURE PARK 0.0 18.6 0 1 0
20 Riverview Park NEIGHBORHOOD PARK EXISTING 12.4 12.4 X 0 1 1
21 Lake Street Open Space NATURAL AREA EXISTING 0.3 0.3 X 0 0 0
21 Tonkin Park SPECIAL USE EXISTING 0.2 0.2 X 1 0 0 0
22 Skate Parks FACILITY FUTURE PARK X X 350,000$ Each smaller skate area 0 0 0
23 Maplewood Park NEIGHBORHOOD PARK EXISTING 2.0 2.0 X X X 1 0 1
23 Veterans Memorial Park SPECIAL USE EXISTING 0.2 0.2 X 0 0 0
24 Glencoe Park*NEIGHBORHOOD PARK EXISTING 0.5 0.5 X 0 0 0
24 Heritage Park NEIGHBORHOOD PARK EXISTING 9.2 9.2 X 1 1 1
24 Maplewood Roadside Park SPECIAL USE EXISTING 1.1 1.1 X 0 0 0
25 Springbrook Watershed NATURAL AREA EXISTING 52.2 52.2 0 0 0
26 Sit In Park SPECIAL USE EXISTING 0.5 0.5 X 0 0 0
TOTAL 1,243.1 1,529.8 52 32 39 16 13 58 25 3 25 3 25.7 5.1 17 8 33 25 3 $ 42,480,000 $ 1,610,000 $ 1,010,000
Note: Operating Cost totals remove double counting of replaced facilities. Totals do not include improvements to School District facilities that may result from new partnership opportunities.
* Parks that have been provisionally classified even though they do not meet minimum size or other design guidelines
**Boeing EIS Waterfront Park development would only occur if the Boeing Company surplused the Renton facilities.
Renton_Cost_Model_010720 6
C.2 - Cost Model Support Material
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
224 | CITY OF RENTON
APPENDIX C: PROJECT LIST AND COST MODEL
This page intentionally left blank
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 225
APPENDIX C: PROJECT LIST AND COST MODELTable_C-3 By Park Category
Priority #Project Project Description Total Score Total Capital Cost
Total Capital Cost
Projection
5 Years
Total Capital Cost
Projection
10 Years
Total Capital Cost
Projection
20 Years
Total Existing Annual
Operating Cost
(2019 Dollars)
Total Proposed Annual
Operating Cost (2019
Dollars)
Total Operating Cost
(Existing + Proposed
2019 Dollars)
Neighborhood Parks
1
May Creek Park Develop park according to design guidelines (parking, picnic, play area, hard surface court, open turf area,
restrooms, trail connections) using concept plan as a reference, create/implement management plan
addressing wetlands. Potential acquisition to increase park usability.
27
9,830,000$ 13,173,000$ 16,012,000$ 26,082,000$ 124,500$ 65,500$ 190,000$
2 Cleveland Richardson Property Develop park according to design guidelines using concept plan as a reference, create and implement
management plan. 25 10,537,000$ 14,120,000$ 17,163,000$ 27,957,000$ 178,500$ 65,000$ 243,500$
2
North Highlands Park and
Neighborhood Center
Re-master plan park and redevelop neighborhood building for multi-generational use. Potential for
partnerships. Located within the larger Sunset Planned Action EIS area. Capital improvements and major
maintenance as needed.
25
2,673,000$ 3,582,000$ 4,354,000$ 7,092,000$ 1,550,500$ -$ 1,550,500$
2
Tiffany Park Renovate according to design guidelines using concept plan as a reference. Expand to connect to Cascade
Park. Potentially repurpose and expand neighborhood building for environmental learning as shown on
concept plan. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.
25
4,372,000$ 5,859,000$ 7,122,000$ 11,601,000$ 110,300$ -$ 110,300$
3
Edlund Property Develop park according to design guidelines using concept plan as a reference, create and implement
management plan addressing wetland. Continue acquistions to make connection to the Panther Creek
Wetland.
24
10,739,000$ 14,391,000$ 17,492,000$ 28,493,000$ 133,100$ 66,900$ 200,000$
3 Kenyon Dobson Park Develop interpretive/education center, trailhead, parking, restrooms.24 3,725,000$ 4,992,000$ 6,068,000$ 9,884,000$ 14,300$ 600,000$ 614,300$
4
Burnett Linear Park*Included in the Renton Downtown Civic Core Vision and Action Plan and the City Center Plan. Improvements
identify expanding park to the north (Renton Connector). Reconfigure existing parking lot between 4th and
5th. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.
23
885,000$ 1,187,000$ 1,443,000$ 2,350,000$ 8,300$ 6,700$ 15,000$
5
Philip Arnold Park Potential partnership with neighboring landowner (currently Puget Sound Energy) to enhance usability and
access. Improve ballfield and multipurpose field. Renovate or remove neighborhood building and restrooms.
Included in the City Center Plan. Planned park bond improvements include: relocate playground, improve
ADA accessibility, refurbish picnic areas, refurbish basketball court surround, refurbish parking lot, add
lighting and a loop trail. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.
20
4,179,000$ 5,600,000$ 6,807,000$ 11,088,000$ 183,300$ 5,000$ 188,300$
6
City Center Neighborhood Park 1 Develop neighborhood park amenities at existing Senior Activity Center site after phasing out existing
maintenance buildings, which will require acquisition of a new site. Included in the City Center Plan,
Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8 and the Cedar River Basin Plan. 19
5,488,000$ 7,354,000$ 8,939,000$ 14,561,000$ 21,000$ 81,500$ 102,500$
6
Jones Park Shoreline stabilization. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. Included in the City Center
Plan and Downtown Civic Core Vision and Action Plan. Adjacent trail corridor adds enough size to serve as a
full neighborhood park. Park in the Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8 and Cedar River Basin Plan.
19
1,017,000$ 1,363,000$ 1,657,000$ 2,699,000$ 43,000$ -$ 43,000$
6
Kiwanis Park Potential acquisition to expand park to increase usability. Bond improvements include: improving field and
installing ADA access from Union Avenue, renovating or removing neighborhood building, replacing
playground and renovating hard surface courts and parking, and adding picnic plaza. Capital improvements
and major maintenance as needed.
19
2,838,000$ 3,803,000$ 4,623,000$ 7,530,000$ 127,500$ 5,000$ 132,500$
6 Sunset Neighborhood Park Final phase contruction to be completed in 2020. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.19 200,000$ 268,000$ 326,000$ 531,000$ 64,000$ -$ 64,000$
6 Thomas Teasdale Park Improve outfield drainage. Potential re-purpose of neighborhood building. Renovate existing ballfield to
create all-abilities ballfield. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.19 3,420,000$ 4,583,000$ 5,571,000$ 9,075,000$ 137,500$ -$ 137,500$
7
Kennydale Lions Park Renovate according to design guidelines using concept plan as a reference. Park acreage is not fully
developed and current configuration of facilities limits usage. Renovate existing neighborhood building.
Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.
17
2,994,000$ 4,012,000$ 4,877,000$ 7,944,000$ 41,300$ 40,000$ 81,300$
8 Parkwood South Div #3 Park*Acquire adjacent land to bring this site up to minimum size of 2 acres of developable land; master plan and
develop a neighborhood park according to design guidelines.16 448,000$ 601,000$ 731,000$ 1,191,000$ 4,300$ 200$ 4,500$
9
Cascade Park Renovate according to design guildelines using the concept plan as a reference. Expand park to connect
Cascade Park to Tiffany Park, improve road access and increase visibility. Potential for off leash area within
park. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.
15
6,161,000$ 8,256,000$ 10,035,000$ 16,346,000$ 83,300$ 69,500$ 152,800$
9 Earlington Park*Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.15 206,000$ 276,000$ 335,000$ 546,000$ 11,300$ -$ 11,300$
9
Kennydale Beach Park*Reconfigure dock for improved life guarding, renovate restroom/lifeguard facility. Acquire land to enhance
usability. Park included in the Shoreline Master Program and WRIA 8, Eastrail is located adjacent to the East
park boundary. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.15
896,000$ 1,201,000$ 1,460,000$ 2,378,000$ 85,600$ 5,300$ 90,900$
10 Benson Neighborhood Park 1 Acquire and develop one neighborhood park east of S Benson Rd and north of SE Puget Drive.14 6,838,000$ 9,163,000$ 11,138,000$ 18,143,000$ -$ 102,500$ 102,500$
10 Benson Neighborhood Park 2 Acquire and develop one neighborhood park west of SR 515 around SE 192nd Street.14 6,838,000$ 9,163,000$ 11,138,000$ 18,143,000$ -$ 102,500$ 102,500$
10
SE 186th Place Properties*Undersized and surrounded by private property; potential for community garden, tree nursery or play area
to serve local residents. If not used for neighborhood park functions, replace with an additional park east of
SR 515.
14
1,250,000$ 1,675,000$ 2,036,000$ 3,316,000$ 4,500$ -$ 4,500$
10 Soos Creek Greenway:
Boulevard Lane
A portion of the King County owned Soos Creek Greenway, within the Renton City Limits. This neighborhood
park may be transferred to the City and rennovated. This park includes a substantial natural area.14 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 227,300$ 227,300$
Renton_Cost_Model_010720 7
C.3 - Project List and Cost Model by Park Category
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
226 | CITY OF RENTON
APPENDIX C: PROJECT LIST AND COST MODEL
This page intentionally left blank
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 227
APPENDIX C: PROJECT LIST AND COST MODELTable_C-3 By Park Category
Priority #Project Project Description Total Score Total Capital Cost
Total Capital Cost
Projection
5 Years
Total Capital Cost
Projection
10 Years
Total Capital Cost
Projection
20 Years
Total Existing Annual
Operating Cost
(2019 Dollars)
Total Proposed Annual
Operating Cost (2019
Dollars)
Total Operating Cost
(Existing + Proposed
2019 Dollars)
10
Talbot Hill Reservoir Park Renovate site with features that differentiate it from nearby Thomas Teasedale Park. Potentially add loop
walk and picnic area. Refurbish tennis and pickleball courts. Capital improvements and major maintenance as
needed.
14
673,000$ 902,000$ 1,096,000$ 1,785,000$ 19,500$ -$ 19,500$
10 Windsor Hills Park Potential acquisitions to enhance park usability and visibility from street. Redevelop according to design
guideline and concept plan. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.14 3,635,000$ 4,871,000$ 5,921,000$ 9,645,000$ 34,800$ 16,400$ 51,200$
11 East Plateau Neighborhood Park 1 Acquire and develop a neighborhood park south of Sunset Boulevard and east of Duvall.13 6,838,000$ 9,163,000$ 11,138,000$ 18,143,000$ -$ 102,500$ 102,500$
11 East Plateau Neighborhood Park 2 Acquire and develop a neighborhood park north of SE 128th Street.13 6,838,000$ 9,163,000$ 11,138,000$ 18,143,000$ -$ 102,500$ 102,500$
11 Highlands Neighborhood Park 1 Acquire and develop a neighborhood park north of Sunset Boulevard, west of Duvall.13 6,838,000$ 9,163,000$ 11,138,000$ 18,143,000$ -$ 102,500$ 102,500$
11 Highlands Neighborhood Park 2 Acquire and develop a neighborhood park south of NE 3rd Street.13 6,838,000$ 9,163,000$ 11,138,000$ 18,143,000$ -$ 102,500$ 102,500$
11 Kennydale Neighborhood Park 1 Acquire and develop a neighborhood park west of I-405.13 6,838,000$ 9,163,000$ 11,138,000$ 18,143,000$ -$ 102,500$ 102,500$
11 Kennydale Neighborhood Park 2 Acquire and develop a neighborhood park east of I-405 and north of the May Creek Greenway.13 6,838,000$ 9,163,000$ 11,138,000$ 18,143,000$ -$ 102,500$ 102,500$
11 West Hills Neighborhood Park Acquire and develop one neighborhood park north of Renton Avenue.13 6,838,000$ 9,163,000$ 11,138,000$ 18,143,000$ -$ 102,500$ 102,500$
12 Riverview Park Park in Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8 and the Cedar River Basin Plan. Capital improvements and major
maintenance as needed.11 465,000$ 623,000$ 757,000$ 1,233,000$ 133,000$ -$ 133,000$
13 Maplewood Park Renovate or remove restrooms. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.8 573,000$ 768,000$ 934,000$ 1,521,000$ 44,900$ -$ 44,900$
14 Glencoe Park*Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.7 31,000$ 42,000$ 51,000$ 83,000$ 3,800$ -$ 3,800$
14 Heritage Park Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.7 573,000$ 768,000$ 934,000$ 1,521,000$ 133,800$ -$ 133,800$
Subtotal Neighborhood Parks 139,350,000$ 186,737,000$ 226,986,000$ 369,739,000$ 3,295,900$ 2,176,800$ 5,472,700$
Community Parks
1
N.A.R.CO Property Develop according to design guidelines and Riverside: Tri Park Concept Plan to include artificial turf soccer
fields, relocated trail, parking, picnic facilities, play area, restrooms, bike park/bmx/pump track and climbing
wall. Park included in the Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8 and the Cedar River Basin Plan. Capital
improvements and major maintenance as needed.
33
23,646,000$ 31,688,000$ 38,517,000$ 62,740,000$ 289,200$ 170,000$ 459,200$
2
Cedar River Park Existing major building facilities include RCC and Carco Theatre. Enclose lap pool at Henry Moses Aquatic
Center, potential field reconfiguration. Redevelop elements as shown on the revised Riverside: Tri Park
Concept Plan. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. Also included in the Shoreline
Master Program, WRIA 8 and the Cedar River Basin Plan.
29
16,248,000$ 21,774,000$ 26,466,000$ 43,110,000$ 4,529,200$ 1,000,000$ 5,529,200$
3
Highlands Park and Neighborhood
Center
Re-develop according to design guidelines using concept plan as a reference. Existing property is inefficient
as configured. Located within the larger Sunset Planned Action EIS area. Capital improvements and major
maintenance as needed.
27
15,400,000$ 20,637,000$ 25,084,000$ 40,859,000$ 1,710,600$ 60,000$ 1,770,600$
4
Liberty Park Re-develop according to design standards and the Riverside: Tri-Park Concept Plan. Improve ballfields in the
short term (for example levelling). Repurpose Community Building for environmental learning. Included in
the City Center Plan, Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8 and the Cedar River Basin Plan. Capital
improvements and major maintenance as needed.
26
7,825,000$ 10,486,000$ 12,746,000$ 20,762,000$ 252,200$ 600,000$ 852,200$
4
Ron Regis Park Improve existing and undeveloped fields (with natural turf); extend water service to the park; add a
permanent restroom, playground, and picnic area(s). Park included in the Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8
and the Cedar River Basin Plan. Potential for habitat improvements to stabilize shoreline. Capital
improvements and major maintenance as needed.
26
10,343,000$ 13,861,000$ 16,848,000$ 27,444,000$ 656,100$ 85,000$ 741,100$
5
Cedar River Trail Park Invasive species removal, add utilities for Cedar River Boathouse. Included in City Center Plan, Shoreline
Master Program, WRIA 8 and the Cedar River Basin Plan. Planned connection to future Sam Chastain
Waterfront Trail. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.
21
2,039,000$ 2,732,000$ 3,321,000$ 5,410,000$ 221,200$ -$ 221,200$
6 East Plateau Community Park Acquire site from King County and re-develop according to design guidelines using concept plan as a
reference. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.17 14,675,000$ 19,666,000$ 23,904,000$ 38,937,000$ -$ 605,000$ 605,000$
Subtotal Community Parks 90,176,000$ 120,844,000$ 146,886,000$ 239,262,000$ 7,658,500$ 2,520,000$ 10,178,500$
Renton_Cost_Model_010720 8
C.3 - Project List and Cost Model by Park Category
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
228 | CITY OF RENTON
APPENDIX C: PROJECT LIST AND COST MODEL
This page intentionally left blank
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 229
APPENDIX C: PROJECT LIST AND COST MODELTable_C-3 By Park Category
Priority #Project Project Description Total Score Total Capital Cost
Total Capital Cost
Projection
5 Years
Total Capital Cost
Projection
10 Years
Total Capital Cost
Projection
20 Years
Total Existing Annual
Operating Cost
(2019 Dollars)
Total Proposed Annual
Operating Cost (2019
Dollars)
Total Operating Cost
(Existing + Proposed
2019 Dollars)
Regional Park
1
Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park Maintain and enhance facility for non-motorized boating, acquire land for additional parking, expand
technology, renovate S. beach restrooms & bathhouse. Replace parking lots, irrigation, swim beach
promenade and rosewall/bulkhead. High level of ongoing reinvestment due to intensive use. Planned park
bond improvements include multiple major replacement projects. Included in the City Center Plan, Shoreline
Master Program and WRIA 8, Eastrail is located adjacent to the East park boundary. Capital improvements
and major maintenance as needed.
26
7,824,000$ 10,485,000$ 12,745,000$ 20,760,000$ 1,002,000$ 15,000$ 1,017,000$
2 Boeing EIS Waterfront Park A new park with lakefront access as noted in the Boeing Comprehensive Plan Amendment EIS dated
10/21/03.22 19,350,000$ 25,931,000$ 31,519,000$ 51,341,000$ -$ 1,125,000$ 1,125,000$
Subtotal Regional Parks 27,174,000$ 36,416,000$ 44,264,000$ 72,101,000$ 1,002,000$ 1,140,000$ 2,142,000$
Special Use Parks
1
Piazza, Gateway and former Big 5 site Re-master plan for future park development. Redevelopment of the Piazza Gateway park site and former Big
5 lot should include a plaza and other complementary outdoor spaces allowing activities to extend beyond
the existing park, creating a civic center. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. Included
in the City Center Plan and the Downtown Civic Core Vision and Action Plan.
26
5,650,000$ 7,572,000$ 9,204,000$ 14,992,000$ 9,000$ 3,000$ 12,000$
2 Senior Activity Center Property Potentially expand for multi-generational center. Included in the City Center Plan, Shoreline Master Program,
WRIA 8 and the Cedar River Basin Plan. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.20 140,000$ 188,000$ 229,000$ 373,000$ 1,552,000$ -$ 1,552,000$
3
Maplewood Golf Course Continue to maintain and operate, acquire property as it becomes available. See adopted Master Plan,
included in the Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8, and the Cedar River Basin Plan. Capital and operations
costs are outside of the Community Services budget, within an enterprise fund. Capital Improvements and
major maintenance as needed.
14
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
4
Community Garden/Greenhouse Continue to maintain and operate, expand garden. Potential to be larger neighborhood Park - Planning and
acquisition included in City Center Neighborhood Park 1. Included in the City Center Plan, Shoreline Master
Program, WRIA 8, and the Cedar River Basin Plan.
13
30,000$ 40,000$ 49,000$ 80,000$ 4,500$ -$ 4,500$
5 Tonkin Park Redevelop per Downtown Civic Core Vision and Action Plan. Capital improvements and major maintenance
as needed. Included in the City Center Plan. 10 183,000$ 245,000$ 298,000$ 485,000$ 1,200$ 5,000$ 6,200$
6 Veterans Memorial Park Tile refurbishment. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. Included in the City Center
Plan.8 11,000$ 15,000$ 18,000$ 29,000$ 1,700$ -$ 1,700$
7 Maplewood Roadside Park Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. Included in the Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8
and the Cedar River Basin Plan.7 54,000$ 72,000$ 88,000$ 143,000$ 8,100$ -$ 8,100$
8 Sit In Park Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. Included in the City Center Plan. Included in
Downtown Civic Core.3 25,000$ 34,000$ 41,000$ 67,000$ 3,700$ -$ 3,700$
Subtotal Special Use Parks 6,093,000$ 8,166,000$ 9,927,000$ 16,169,000$ 1,580,200$ 8,000$ 1,588,200$
Natural Areas
1
May Creek Greenway Complete site inventory and management plan, acquire additional land along creek corridor, install soft
surface trail, trailhead(s), creek crossings and partner with Newcastle and King County. Included in the
Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8 and the May Creek Basin Plan.
28
5,700,000$ 7,639,000$ 9,285,000$ 15,124,000$ 22,100$ 4,900$ 27,000$
2
Black River Riparian Forest Develop according to design guidelines using concept plan as a reference, complete site
inventory/management plan, implement management plan. Location of Lake to Sound Trail constructed and
maintained by King County (shown as regional trail connection on the concept plan). Site is in the Shoreline
Master Program, WRIA 9, Green/Duwamish Watershed Management Plan and the Black River Water Quality
Management Plan.
26
7,862,000$ 10,536,000$ 12,807,000$ 20,861,000$ 46,700$ 600,000$ 646,700$
3 Cedar River Natural Area Complete site inventory and management plan, implement management plan. Included in the Shoreline
Master Program, WRIA 8, Cedar River Basin Plan. Continue to acquire properties as they become available. 25 3,281,000$ 4,397,000$ 5,345,000$ 8,706,000$ 132,100$ -$ 132,100$
4
Honey Creek Greenway Complete site inventory and management plan, implement management plan. Develop soft surface trail.
Located in the Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8 and the May Creek Basin Plan. Continue to acquire
properties as they become available.
23
2,615,000$ 3,504,000$ 4,259,000$ 6,937,000$ 21,500$ -$ 21,500$
5 Panther Creek/Edlund Property Included in Edlund Property concept plan. Develop a management plan. Acquire land and easements as
needed to connect to the Panther Creek Wetlands.21 55,000$ 74,000$ 90,000$ 147,000$ 1,800$ -$ 1,800$
6 Panther Creek Wetlands Complete site inventory and management plan, acquire additional land along creek corridor. Create
pedestrian trails and boardwalk system. Managed by Surface Water Utility.20 4,960,000$ 6,647,000$ 8,079,000$ 13,160,000$ 69,600$ -$ 69,600$
7 Renton Wetlands Continue to manage as required by Mitigation Banking Agreements. Portion managed by Surface Water
Utility. Included in the Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 9, Green/Duwamish Watershed Plan.18 430,000$ 576,000$ 700,000$ 1,140,000$ 69,600$ -$ 69,600$
8 Soos Creek Greenway: Renton Park A portion of the King County owned Soos Creek Greenway, within the Renton City Limits. This property may
be transferred to the City once Soos Creek Trail is complete.12 -$ -$ -$ -$ 35,000$ 9,300$ 44,300$
Renton_Cost_Model_010720 9
C.3 - Project List and Cost Model by Park Category
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
230 | CITY OF RENTON
APPENDIX C: PROJECT LIST AND COST MODEL
This page intentionally left blank
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 231
APPENDIX C: PROJECT LIST AND COST MODELTable_C-3 By Park Category
Priority #Project Project Description Total Score Total Capital Cost
Total Capital Cost
Projection
5 Years
Total Capital Cost
Projection
10 Years
Total Capital Cost
Projection
20 Years
Total Existing Annual
Operating Cost
(2019 Dollars)
Total Proposed Annual
Operating Cost (2019
Dollars)
Total Operating Cost
(Existing + Proposed
2019 Dollars)
9 Lake Street Open Space Potential trailhead. Acquire easements as neccesary to connect to Panther Creek Wetlands.10 3,000$ 4,000$ 5,000$ 8,000$ 200$ -$ 200$
10 Springbrook Watershed Managed by Water Utility, not accessible to the public. Capital and operations costs are outside of
Community Services budget.6 -$ -$ -$ 26,100$ -$ 26,100$
Subtotal Natural Area Parks 24,906,000$ 33,377,000$ 40,570,000$ 66,083,000$ 424,700$ 614,200$ 1,038,900$
Corridors
1 Sam Chastain Waterfront Trail Construct the planned waterfront trail and park area, connecting the end of the existing water walk at the
Cedar River Boathouse to the existing paved path at the south end of Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park.27 6,050,000$ 8,108,000$ 9,855,000$ 16,053,000$ -$ -$ -$
2 Corridor Acquisition Acquire or secure new properties providing important linkages between parks and natural areas. Included in
the City Center Plan and the Trails and Bicycle Master Plan.20 6,000,000$ 8,041,000$ 9,774,000$ 15,921,000$ -$ 40,000$ 40,000$
3
Cedar River Trail Corridor Secure ownership of remaining railbanked corridor land between the trestle bridge and Ron Regis Park, also
the remaining corridor near I-405, include acquired land in the surrounding parks and natural areas; maintain
corridor as a regional trail linkage.
13
2,903,000$ 3,890,000$ 4,728,000$ 7,701,000$ 35,000$ 25,800$ 60,800$
Subtotal Corridors 14,953,000$ 20,039,000$ 24,357,000$ 39,675,000$ 35,000$ 65,800$ 100,800$
Recreation Facilities (no location identified)
1 Sports Complex Acquire, plan and develop a 4 field (or more) sports complex to centralize competitive play.22 24,050,000$ 32,229,000$ 39,175,000$ 63,812,000$ -$ 282,500$ 282,500$
2 Non-motorized Boating Facility Acquire land, develop and/or develop partnerships for a non-motorized boating facility. Enhance existing non-
motorized boating facility.17 3,250,000$ 4,355,000$ 5,294,000$ 8,623,000$ -$ -$ -$
3 Community Gardens Acquire land and/or develop additional community gardens through partnerships, potentially as part of new
neighborhood or community parks.16 760,000$ 1,018,000$ 1,237,000$ 2,015,000$ -$ 2,300$ 2,300$
4 Wayfinding and Informational Signage Design and implement wayfinding and park signage throughout the parks, recreation and natural areas
system and install information kiosks and trailhead signage at key points in the trail system.15 650,000$ 872,000$ 1,060,000$ 1,727,000$ -$ -$ -$
5 Dog Parks Acquire land, develop and/or develop partnerships for off-leash areas in four neighborhood or community
parks or other locations.13 1,030,000$ 1,381,000$ 1,679,000$ 2,735,000$ 60,000$ 17,500$ 77,500$
6 Skate Parks Develop new skate park within a community park.9 600,000$ 804,000$ 977,000$ 1,591,000$ -$ -$ -$
Subtotal Facilities 30,340,000$ 40,659,000$ 49,422,000$ 80,503,000$ 60,000$ 302,300$ 362,300$
Trails
1 Trail Expansion & Development Trail connection projects from the Trails and Bicycle Master Plan that are connected to parks and natural
areas.23 50,000$ 67,000$ 81,000$ 132,000$ -$ -$ -$
2 Trailheads and Parking Identify and develop appropriate access points to natural areas.20 50,000$ 67,000$ 81,000$ 132,000$ -$ -$ -$
Subtotal Trails 100,000$ 134,000$ 162,000$ 264,000$ -$ -$ -$
TOTAL 333,092,000$ 446,372,000$ 542,574,000$ 883,796,000$ 14,056,300$ 6,827,100$ 20,883,400$
Note: Operating Cost totals remove double counting of replaced facilities. Totals do not include improvements to School District facilities that may result from new partnership opportunities.
* Parks that have been provisionally classified even though they do not meet minimum size or other design guidelines
**Boeing EIS Waterfront Park development would only occur if the Boeing Company surplused the Renton facilities.
Renton_Cost_Model_010720 10
C.3 - Project List and Cost Model by Park Category
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
232 | CITY OF RENTON
APPENDIX C: PROJECT LIST AND COST MODEL
This page intentionally left blank
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 233
APPENDIX C: PROJECT LIST AND COST MODELTable_C-4 By CPA
Priority #Project Project Description Total Score Total Capital Cost
Total Capital Cost
Projection
5 Years
Total Capital Cost
Projection
10 Years
Total Capital Cost
Projection
20 Years
Total Existing Annual
Operating Cost
(2019 Dollars)
Total Proposed Annual
Operating Cost (2019
Dollars)
Total Operating Cost
(Existing + Proposed
2019 Dollars)
Benson Community Planning Area
1
Tiffany Park Renovate according to design guidelines using concept plan as a reference. Expand to connect to Cascade
Park. Potentially repurpose and expand neighborhood building for environmental learning as shown on
concept plan. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.
25
4,372,000$ 5,859,000$ 7,122,000$ 11,601,000$ 110,300$ -$ 110,300$
2 Parkwood South Div #3 Park*Acquire adjacent land to bring this site up to minimum size of 2 acres of developable land; master plan and
develop a neighborhood park according to design guidelines.16 448,000$ 601,000$ 731,000$ 1,191,000$ 4,300$ 200$ 4,500$
3
Cascade Park Renovate according to design guildelines using the concept plan as a reference. Expand park to connect
Cascade Park to Tiffany Park, improve road access and increase visibility. Potential for off leash area within
park. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.
15
6,161,000$ 8,256,000$ 10,035,000$ 16,346,000$ 83,300$ 69,500$ 152,800$
4 Benson Neighborhood Park 1 Acquire and develop one neighborhood park east of S Benson Rd and north of SE Puget Drive.14 6,838,000$ 9,163,000$ 11,138,000$ 18,143,000$ -$ 102,500$ 102,500$
4 Benson Neighborhood Park 2 Acquire and develop one neighborhood park west of SR 515 around SE 192nd Street.14 6,838,000$ 9,163,000$ 11,138,000$ 18,143,000$ -$ 102,500$ 102,500$
4
SE 186th Place Properties*Undersized and surrounded by private property; potential for community garden, tree nursery or play area
to serve local residents. If not used for neighborhood park functions, replace with an additional park east of
SR 515.
14
1,250,000$ 1,675,000$ 2,036,000$ 3,316,000$ 4,500$ -$ 4,500$
4 Soos Creek Greenway:
Boulevard Lane
A portion of the King County owned Soos Creek Greenway, within the Renton City Limits. This neighborhood
park may be transferred to the City and rennovated. This park includes a substantial natural area.14 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 227,300$ 227,300$
5 Soos Creek Greenway: Renton Park A portion of the King County owned Soos Creek Greenway, within the Renton City Limits. This property may
be transferred to the City once Soos Creek Trail is complete.12 -$ -$ -$ -$ 35,000$ 9,300$ 44,300$
Subtotal Benson Community Planning Area 25,907,000$ 34,717,000$ 42,200,000$ 68,740,000$ 237,400$ 511,300$ 748,700$
Cedar River Community Planning Area
1
N.A.R.CO Property Develop according to design guidelines and Riverside: Tri Park Concept Plan to include artificial turf soccer
fields, relocated trail, parking, picnic facilities, play area, restrooms, bike park/bmx/pump track and climbing
wall. Park included in the Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8 and the Cedar River Basin Plan. Capital
improvements and major maintenance as needed.
33
23,646,000$ 31,688,000$ 38,517,000$ 62,740,000$ 289,200$ 170,000$ 459,200$
2
Cedar River Park Existing major building facilities include RCC and Carco Theatre. Enclose lap pool at Henry Moses Aquatic
Center, potential field reconfiguration. Redevelop elements as shown on the revised Riverside: Tri Park
Concept Plan. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. Also included in the Shoreline
Master Program, WRIA 8 and the Cedar River Basin Plan.
29
16,248,000$ 21,774,000$ 26,466,000$ 43,110,000$ 4,529,200$ 1,000,000$ 5,529,200$
3
Ron Regis Park Improve existing and undeveloped fields (with natural turf); extend water service to the park; add a
permanent restroom, playground, and picnic area(s). Park included in the Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8
and the Cedar River Basin Plan. Potential for habitat improvements to stabilize shoreline. Capital
improvements and major maintenance as needed.
26
10,343,000$ 13,861,000$ 16,848,000$ 27,444,000$ 656,100$ 85,000$ 741,100$
4
Cedar River Natural Area Complete site inventory and management plan, implement management plan. Included in the Shoreline
Master Program, WRIA 8, Cedar River Basin Plan. Continue to acquire properties as they become available. 25
3,281,000$ 4,397,000$ 5,345,000$ 8,706,000$ 132,100$ -$ 132,100$
5
Maplewood Golf Course Continue to maintain and operate, acquire property as it becomes available. See adopted Master Plan,
included in the Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8, and the Cedar River Basin Plan. Capital and operations
costs are outside of the Community Services budget, within an enterprise fund. Capital Improvements and
major maintenance as needed.
14
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6
Cedar River Trail Corridor Secure ownership of remaining railbanked corridor land between the trestle bridge and Ron Regis Park, also
the remaining corridor near I-405, include acquired land in the surrounding parks and natural areas; maintain
corridor as a regional trail linkage.
13
2,903,000$ 3,890,000$ 4,728,000$ 7,701,000$ 35,000$ 25,800$ 60,800$
7 Riverview Park Park in Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8 and the Cedar River Basin Plan. Capital improvements and major
maintenance as needed.11 465,000$ 623,000$ 757,000$ 1,233,000$ 133,000$ -$ 133,000$
8 Maplewood Park Renovate or remove restrooms. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.8 573,000$ 768,000$ 934,000$ 1,521,000$ 44,900$ -$ 44,900$
9 Maplewood Roadside Park Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. Included in the Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8
and the Cedar River Basin Plan.7 54,000$ 72,000$ 88,000$ 143,000$ 8,100$ -$ 8,100$
Subtotal Cedar River Community Planning Area 57,513,000$ 77,073,000$ 93,683,000$ 152,598,000$ 5,827,600$ 1,280,800$ 7,108,400$
Renton_Cost_Model_010720 11
C.4 - Project List and Cost Model by Community Planning Area
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
234 | CITY OF RENTON
APPENDIX C: PROJECT LIST AND COST MODEL
This page intentionally left blank
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 235
APPENDIX C: PROJECT LIST AND COST MODELTable_C-4 By CPA
Priority #Project Project Description Total Score Total Capital Cost
Total Capital Cost
Projection
5 Years
Total Capital Cost
Projection
10 Years
Total Capital Cost
Projection
20 Years
Total Existing Annual
Operating Cost
(2019 Dollars)
Total Proposed Annual
Operating Cost (2019
Dollars)
Total Operating Cost
(Existing + Proposed
2019 Dollars)
City Center Community Planning Area
1 Sam Chastain Waterfront Trail Construct the planned waterfront trail and park area, connecting the end of the existing water walk at the
Cedar River Boathouse to the existing paved path at the south end of Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park.27 6,050,000$ 8,108,000$ 9,855,000$ 16,053,000$ -$ -$ -$
2
Liberty Park Re-develop according to design standards and the Riverside: Tri-Park Concept Plan. Improve ballfields in the
short term (for example levelling). Repurpose Community Building for environmental learning. Included in
the City Center Plan, Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8 and the Cedar River Basin Plan. Capital
improvements and major maintenance as needed.
26
7,825,000$ 10,486,000$ 12,746,000$ 20,762,000$ 252,200$ 600,000$ 852,200$
2
Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park Maintain and enhance facility for non-motorized boating, acquire land for additional parking, expand
technology, renovate S. beach restrooms & bathhouse. Replace parking lots, irrigation, swim beach
promenade and rosewall/bulkhead. High level of ongoing reinvestment due to intensive use. Planned park
bond improvements include multiple major replacement projects. Included in the City Center Plan, Shoreline
Master Program and WRIA 8, Eastrail is located adjacent to the East park boundary. Capital improvements
and major maintenance as needed.
26
7,824,000$ 10,485,000$ 12,745,000$ 20,760,000$ 1,002,000$ 15,000$ 1,017,000$
2
Piazza, Gateway and former Big 5 site Re-master plan for future park development. Redevelopment of the Piazza Gateway park site and former Big
5 lot should include a plaza and other complementary outdoor spaces allowing activities to extend beyond
the existing park, creating a civic center. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. Included
in the City Center Plan and the Downtown Civic Core Vision and Action Plan.
26
5,650,000$ 7,572,000$ 9,204,000$ 14,992,000$ 9,000$ 3,000$ 12,000$
3
Burnett Linear Park*Included in the Renton Downtown Civic Core Vision and Action Plan and the City Center Plan. Improvements
identify expanding park to the north (Renton Connector). Reconfigure existing parking lot between 4th and
5th. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.
23
885,000$ 1,187,000$ 1,443,000$ 2,350,000$ 8,300$ 6,700$ 15,000$
4 Boeing EIS Waterfront Park A new park with lakefront access as noted in the Boeing Comprehensive Plan Amendment EIS dated
10/21/03.22 19,350,000$ 25,931,000$ 31,519,000$ 51,341,000$ -$ 1,125,000$ 1,125,000$
5
Cedar River Trail Park Invasive species removal, add utilities for Cedar River Boathouse. Included in City Center Plan, Shoreline
Master Program, WRIA 8 and the Cedar River Basin Plan. Planned connection to future Sam Chastain
Waterfront Trail. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.
21
2,039,000$ 2,732,000$ 3,321,000$ 5,410,000$ 221,200$ -$ 221,200$
6
Philip Arnold Park Potential partnership with neighboring landowner (currently Puget Sound Energy) to enhance usability and
access. Improve ballfield and multipurpose field. Renovate or remove neighborhood building and restrooms.
Included in the City Center Plan. Planned park bond improvements include: relocate playground, improve
ADA accessibility, refurbish picnic areas, refurbish basketball court surround, refurbish parking lot, add
lighting and a loop trail. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.
20
4,179,000$ 5,600,000$ 6,807,000$ 11,088,000$ 183,300$ 5,000$ 188,300$
6 Senior Activity Center Property Potentially expand for multi-generational center. Included in the City Center Plan, Shoreline Master Program,
WRIA 8 and the Cedar River Basin Plan. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.20 140,000$ 188,000$ 229,000$ 373,000$ 1,552,000$ -$ 1,552,000$
7
City Center Neighborhood Park 1 Develop neighborhood park amenities at existing Senior Activity Center site after phasing out existing
maintenance buildings, which will require acquisition of a new site. Included in the City Center Plan,
Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8 and the Cedar River Basin Plan.
19
5,488,000$ 7,354,000$ 8,939,000$ 14,561,000$ 21,000$ 81,500$ 102,500$
7
Jones Park Shoreline stabilization. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. Included in the City Center
Plan and Downtown Civic Core Vision and Action Plan. Adjacent trail corridor adds enough size to serve as a
full neighborhood park. Park in the Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8 and Cedar River Basin Plan.
19
1,017,000$ 1,363,000$ 1,657,000$ 2,699,000$ 43,000$ -$ 43,000$
8
Community Garden/Greenhouse Continue to maintain and operate, expand garden. Potential to be larger neighborhood Park - Planning and
acquisition included in City Center Neighborhood Park 1. Included in the City Center Plan, Shoreline Master
Program, WRIA 8, and the Cedar River Basin Plan.
13
30,000$ 40,000$ 49,000$ 80,000$ 4,500$ -$ 4,500$
9 Tonkin Park Redevelop per Downtown Civic Core Vision and Action Plan. Capital improvements and major maintenance
as needed. Included in the City Center Plan. 10 183,000$ 245,000$ 298,000$ 485,000$ 1,200$ 5,000$ 6,200$
10 Veterans Memorial Park Tile refurbishment. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. Included in the City Center
Plan.8 11,000$ 15,000$ 18,000$ 29,000$ 1,700$ -$ 1,700$
11 Sit In Park Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. Included in the City Center Plan. Included in
Downtown Civic Core.3 25,000$ 34,000$ 41,000$ 67,000$ 3,700$ -$ 3,700$
Subtotal City Center Community Planning Area 60,696,000$ 81,340,000$ 98,871,000$ 161,050,000$ 3,303,100$ 1,841,200$ 5,144,300$
Renton_Cost_Model_010720 12
C.4 - Project List and Cost Model by Community Planning Area
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
236 | CITY OF RENTON
APPENDIX C: PROJECT LIST AND COST MODEL
This page intentionally left blank
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 237
APPENDIX C: PROJECT LIST AND COST MODEL
C.4 - Project List and Cost Model by Community Planning Area
Table_C-4 By CPA
Priority #Project Project Description Total Score Total Capital Cost
Total Capital Cost
Projection
5 Years
Total Capital Cost
Projection
10 Years
Total Capital Cost
Projection
20 Years
Total Existing Annual
Operating Cost
(2019 Dollars)
Total Proposed Annual
Operating Cost (2019
Dollars)
Total Operating Cost
(Existing + Proposed
2019 Dollars)
East Plateau Community Planning Area
1
May Creek Park Develop park according to design guidelines (parking, picnic, play area, hard surface court, open turf area,
restrooms, trail connections) using concept plan as a reference, create/implement management plan
addressing wetlands. Potential acquisition to increase park usability.
27
9,830,000$ 13,173,000$ 16,012,000$ 26,082,000$ 124,500$ 65,500$ 190,000$
2 East Plateau Community Park Acquire site from King County and re-develop according to design guidelines using concept plan as a
reference. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.17 14,675,000$ 19,666,000$ 23,904,000$ 38,937,000$ -$ 605,000$ 605,000$
3 East Plateau Neighborhood Park 1 Acquire and develop a neighborhood park south of Sunset Boulevard and east of Duvall.13 6,838,000$ 9,163,000$ 11,138,000$ 18,143,000$ -$ 102,500$ 102,500$
3 East Plateau Neighborhood Park 2 Acquire and develop a neighborhood park north of SE 128th Street.13 6,838,000$ 9,163,000$ 11,138,000$ 18,143,000$ -$ 102,500$ 102,500$
Subtotal East Plateau Community Planning Area 38,181,000$ 51,165,000$ 62,192,000$ 101,305,000$ 124,500$ 875,500$ 1,000,000$
Highlands Community Planning Area
1
Highlands Park and Neighborhood
Center
Re-develop according to design guidelines using concept plan as a reference. Existing property is inefficient
as configured. Located within the larger Sunset Planned Action EIS area. Capital improvements and major
maintenance as needed.
27
15,400,000$ 20,637,000$ 25,084,000$ 40,859,000$ 1,710,600$ 60,000$ 1,770,600$
2
North Highlands Park and
Neighborhood Center
Re-master plan park and redevelop neighborhood building for multi-generational use. Potential for
partnerships. Located within the larger Sunset Planned Action EIS area. Capital improvements and major
maintenance as needed.
25
2,673,000$ 3,582,000$ 4,354,000$ 7,092,000$ 1,550,500$ -$ 1,550,500$
3
Honey Creek Greenway Complete site inventory and management plan, implement management plan. Develop soft surface trail.
Located in the Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8 and the May Creek Basin Plan. Continue to acquire
properties as they become available.
23
2,615,000$ 3,504,000$ 4,259,000$ 6,937,000$ 21,500$ -$ 21,500$
4
Kiwanis Park Potential acquisition to expand park to increase usability. Bond improvements include: improving field and
installing ADA access from Union Avenue, renovating or removing neighborhood building, replacing
playground and renovating hard surface courts and parking, and adding picnic plaza. Capital improvements
and major maintenance as needed.
19
2,838,000$ 3,803,000$ 4,623,000$ 7,530,000$ 127,500$ 5,000$ 132,500$
4 Sunset Neighborhood Park Final phase contruction to be completed in 2020. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.19 200,000$ 268,000$ 326,000$ 531,000$ 64,000$ -$ 64,000$
5 Windsor Hills Park Potential acquisitions to enhance park usability and visibility from street. Redevelop according to design
guideline and concept plan. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.14 3,635,000$ 4,871,000$ 5,921,000$ 9,645,000$ 34,800$ 16,400$ 51,200$
6 Highlands Neighborhood Park 1 Acquire and develop a neighborhood park north of Sunset Boulevard, west of Duvall.13 6,838,000$ 9,163,000$ 11,138,000$ 18,143,000$ -$ 102,500$ 102,500$
6 Highlands Neighborhood Park 2 Acquire and develop a neighborhood park south of NE 3rd Street.13 6,838,000$ 9,163,000$ 11,138,000$ 18,143,000$ -$ 102,500$ 102,500$
7 Glencoe Park*Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.7 31,000$ 42,000$ 51,000$ 83,000$ 3,800$ -$ 3,800$
7 Heritage Park Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.7 573,000$ 768,000$ 934,000$ 1,521,000$ 133,800$ -$ 133,800$
Subtotal Highlands Community Planning Area 41,641,000$ 55,801,000$ 67,828,000$ 110,484,000$ 3,646,500$ 286,400$ 3,932,900$
Kennydale Community Planning Area
1
May Creek Greenway Complete site inventory and management plan, acquire additional land along creek corridor, install soft
surface trail, trailhead(s), creek crossings and partner with Newcastle and King County. Included in the
Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8 and the May Creek Basin Plan.
28
5,700,000$ 7,639,000$ 9,285,000$ 15,124,000$ 22,100$ 4,900$ 27,000$
2 Kenyon Dobson Park Develop interpretive/education center, trailhead, parking, restrooms.24 3,725,000$ 4,992,000$ 6,068,000$ 9,884,000$ 14,300$ 600,000$ 614,300$
3
Kennydale Lions Park Renovate according to design guidelines using concept plan as a reference. Park acreage is not fully
developed and current configuration of facilities limits usage. Renovate existing neighborhood building.
Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.
17
2,994,000$ 4,012,000$ 4,877,000$ 7,944,000$ 41,300$ 40,000$ 81,300$
4
Kennydale Beach Park*Reconfigure dock for improved life guarding, renovate restroom/lifeguard facility. Acquire land to enhance
usability. Park included in the Shoreline Master Program and WRIA 8, Eastrail is located adjacent to the East
park boundary. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.
15
896,000$ 1,201,000$ 1,460,000$ 2,378,000$ 85,600$ 5,300$ 90,900$
5 Kennydale Neighborhood Park 1 Acquire and develop a neighborhood park west of I-405.13 6,838,000$ 9,163,000$ 11,138,000$ 18,143,000$ -$ 102,500$ 102,500$
5 Kennydale Neighborhood Park 2 Acquire and develop a neighborhood park east of I-405 and north of the May Creek Greenway.13 6,838,000$ 9,163,000$ 11,138,000$ 18,143,000$ -$ 102,500$ 102,500$
Subtotal Kennydale Community Planning Area 26,991,000$ 36,170,000$ 43,966,000$ 71,616,000$ 163,300$ 855,200$ 1,018,500$
Renton_Cost_Model_010720 13
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
238 | CITY OF RENTON
APPENDIX C: PROJECT LIST AND COST MODEL
This page intentionally left blank
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 239
APPENDIX C: PROJECT LIST AND COST MODEL
C.4 - Project List and Cost Model by Community Planning Area
Table_C-4 By CPA
Priority #Project Project Description Total Score Total Capital Cost
Total Capital Cost
Projection
5 Years
Total Capital Cost
Projection
10 Years
Total Capital Cost
Projection
20 Years
Total Existing Annual
Operating Cost
(2019 Dollars)
Total Proposed Annual
Operating Cost (2019
Dollars)
Total Operating Cost
(Existing + Proposed
2019 Dollars)
Talbot Community Planning Area
1 Cleveland Richardson Property Develop park according to design guidelines using concept plan as a reference, create and implement
management plan. 25 10,537,000$ 14,120,000$ 17,163,000$ 27,957,000$ 178,500$ 65,000$ 243,500$
2
Edlund Property Develop park according to design guidelines using concept plan as a reference, create and implement
management plan addressing wetland. Continue acquistions to make connection to the Panther Creek
Wetland.
24
10,739,000$ 14,391,000$ 17,492,000$ 28,493,000$ 133,100$ 66,900$ 200,000$
3 Panther Creek/Edlund Property Included in Edlund Property concept plan. Develop a management plan. Acquire land and easements as
needed to connect to the Panther Creek Wetlands.21 55,000$ 74,000$ 90,000$ 147,000$ 1,800$ -$ 1,800$
4 Panther Creek Wetlands Complete site inventory and management plan, acquire additional land along creek corridor. Create
pedestrian trails and boardwalk system. Managed by Surface Water Utility.20 4,960,000$ 6,647,000$ 8,079,000$ 13,160,000$ 69,600$ -$ 69,600$
5 Thomas Teasdale Park Improve outfield drainage. Potential re-purpose of neighborhood building. Renovate existing ballfield to
create all-abilities ballfield. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.19 3,420,000$ 4,583,000$ 5,571,000$ 9,075,000$ 137,500$ -$ 137,500$
6
Talbot Hill Reservoir Park Renovate site with features that differentiate it from nearby Thomas Teasedale Park. Potentially add loop
walk and picnic area. Refurbish tennis and pickleball courts. Capital improvements and major maintenance as
needed.
14
673,000$ 902,000$ 1,096,000$ 1,785,000$ 19,500$ -$ 19,500$
7 Lake Street Open Space Potential trailhead. Acquire easements as neccesary to connect to Panther Creek Wetlands.10 3,000$ 4,000$ 5,000$ 8,000$ 200$ -$ 200$
8 Springbrook Watershed Managed by Water Utility, not accessible to the public. Capital and operations costs are outside of
Community Services budget.6 -$ -$ -$ 26,100$ -$ 26,100$
Subtotal Talbot Community Planning Area 30,387,000$ 40,721,000$ 49,496,000$ 80,625,000$ 566,300$ 131,900$ 698,200$
Valley Community Planning Area
1
Black River Riparian Forest Develop according to design guidelines using concept plan as a reference, complete site
inventory/management plan, implement management plan. Location of Lake to Sound Trail constructed and
maintained by King County (shown as regional trail connection on the concept plan). Site is in the Shoreline
Master Program, WRIA 9, Green/Duwamish Watershed Management Plan and the Black River Water Quality
Management Plan.
26
7,862,000$ 10,536,000$ 12,807,000$ 20,861,000$ 46,700$ 600,000$ 646,700$
2 Renton Wetlands Continue to manage as required by Mitigation Banking Agreements. Portion managed by Surface Water
Utility. Included in the Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 9, Green/Duwamish Watershed Plan.18 430,000$ 576,000$ 700,000$ 1,140,000$ 69,600$ -$ 69,600$
Subtotal Valley Community Planning Area 8,292,000$ 11,112,000$ 13,507,000$ 22,001,000$ 116,300$ 600,000$ 716,300$
West Hill Community Planning Area
1 Earlington Park*Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.15 206,000$ 276,000$ 335,000$ 546,000$ 11,300$ -$ 11,300$
2 West Hills Neighborhood Park Acquire and develop one neighborhood park north of Renton Avenue.13 6,838,000$ 9,163,000$ 11,138,000$ 18,143,000$ -$ 102,500$ 102,500$
Subtotal West Hill Community Planning Area 7,044,000$ 9,439,000$ 11,473,000$ 18,689,000$ 11,300$ 102,500$ 113,800$
Multiple or No Specified Community Planning Area
1 Trail Expansion & Development Trail connection projects from the Trails and Bicycle Master Plan that are connected to parks and natural
areas.23 50,000$ 67,000$ 81,000$ 132,000$ -$ -$ -$
2 Sports Complex Acquire, plan and develop a 4 field (or more) sports complex to centralize competitive play.22 24,050,000$ 32,229,000$ 39,175,000$ 63,812,000$ -$ 282,500$ 282,500$
3 Corridor Acquisition Acquire or secure new properties providing important linkages between parks and natural areas. Included in
the City Center Plan and the Trails and Bicycle Master Plan.20 6,000,000$ 8,041,000$ 9,774,000$ 15,921,000$ -$ 40,000$ 40,000$
3 Trailheads and Parking Identify and develop appropriate access points to natural areas.20 50,000$ 67,000$ 81,000$ 132,000$ -$ -$ -$
4 Non-motorized Boating Facility Acquire land, develop and/or develop partnerships for a non-motorized boating facility. Enhance existing non-
motorized boating facility.17 3,250,000$ 4,355,000$ 5,294,000$ 8,623,000$ -$ -$ -$
5 Community Gardens Acquire land and/or develop additional community gardens through partnerships, potentially as part of new
neighborhood or community parks.16 760,000$ 1,018,000$ 1,237,000$ 2,015,000$ -$ 2,300$ 2,300$
6 Wayfinding and Informational Signage Design and implement wayfinding and park signage throughout the parks, recreation and natural areas
system and install information kiosks and trailhead signage at key points in the trail system.15 650,000$ 872,000$ 1,060,000$ 1,727,000$ -$ -$ -$
7 Dog Parks Acquire land, develop and/or develop partnerships for off-leash areas in four neighborhood or community
parks or other locations.13 1,030,000$ 1,381,000$ 1,679,000$ 2,735,000$ 60,000$ 17,500$ 77,500$
8 Skate Parks Develop new skate park within a community park.9 600,000$ 804,000$ 977,000$ 1,591,000$ -$ -$ -$
Subtotal Multiple or No Specified Community Planning Area 36,440,000$ 48,834,000$ 59,358,000$ 96,688,000$ 60,000$ 342,300$ 402,300$
TOTAL 333,092,000$ 446,372,000$ 542,574,000$ 883,796,000$ 14,056,300$ 6,827,100$ 20,883,400$
Note: Operating Cost totals remove double counting of replaced facilities. Totals do not include improvements to School District facilities that may result from new partnership opportunities.
* Parks that have been provisionally classified even though they do not meet minimum size or other design guidelines
**Boeing EIS Waterfront Park development would only occur if the Boeing Company surplused the Renton facilities.
Renton_Cost_Model_010720 14
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
240 | CITY OF RENTON
APPENDIX C: PROJECT LIST AND COST MODEL
This page intentionally left blank
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
¡QUEREMOS ESCUCHAR SUS OPINIONES!
Acompáñenos a un taller comunitario interactivo para hablar
sobre los parques y las áreas recreativas y naturales en Renton.
Cuándo: 28 de febrero de 2019, 6:00 a 8:00 p. m.
Dónde: Renton Community Center 1715 SE Maple Valley Hwy
* Se servirán pequeños refrigerios.
REMAR, JUGAR, IR DE PÍCNIC...
Habrá interpretación al español y al vietnamita disponible en el taller. Para programar otro
tipo de asistencia, llame con 48 horas de anticipación: 711 (TDD) o 425-430-6600 (voz).
¿CÓMO USA LOS PARQUES DE RENTON?
PLAN PARA LOS PARQUES Y LAS
ÁREAS RECREATIVAS Y NATURALES
Renton
www.rentonparksplan.com
D
CONNECTING WITH THE COMMUNITY
APPENDIX
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
242 | CITY OF RENTON
APPENDIx D: CONNECTING WITH THE COMMUNITY
MAKING THE CONNECTION
The foundation of the Parks, Recreation and Natural Areas Plan is based on community ideas and feedback.
With a commitment to engaging Renton’s diverse community members, the 2019 Plan process utilized a
variety of communication methods to reach out to the public. Guidance from City staff, committees and
community stakeholders also formed the basis for developing the Plan. A summary of this feedback is
provided in Chapter 3, Community Involvement.
Engagement in Multiple Languages
Communications and engagement opportunities for the Plan were provided in three languages, including
English, Spanish and Vietnamese. Community open houses and online open houses were advertised
in English, Spanish and Vietnamese on social media and through the Renton School District. Translated
materials and interpretation were provided at the community open houses, online open houses, inclusive
engagement activities and the Community Priority Survey.
OUTREACH METHODS
• Gov Delivery email list with approximately 20,000 recipients, including committees and commissions
• Renton School District Schools Peach Jar
• Renton Reporter Calendar, print and digital ads
• La Raza print and digital ad
• Facebook
• Twitter
• City Website
• Neighborhood Association email list
• Next Door
• Renton City News
• Media Advisory
• “Let’s Go Renton” Brochure
• Televised Administrative Report to the Renton City Council
• eGrapevine Announcement
• Byte of Renton Article and Calendar
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 243
APPENDIx D: CONNECTING WITH THE COMMUNITY
• Posters and flyers at the following locations:
-Renton Library
-Fairwood Library
-Skyway Library
-Highlands Library
-Renton Community Center
-Highlands Neighborhood Center and North Highlands Neighborhood Center
-Renton Senior Activity Center
• Distributed by committees
• Inclusive engagement strategy (see Chapter 3 for full description)
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
244 | CITY OF RENTON
APPENDIx D: CONNECTING WITH THE COMMUNITYRESOLUTION NO. 4398
E
TRAILS MAP
APPENDIX
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
This page intentionally left blank
246 | CITY OF RENTON
APPENDIx E: TRAILS MAP RESOLUTION NO. 4398
CITY OF RENTON | PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 247
APPENDIX C: COST MODEL PRIORITIZATION
nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(^^^^^^^EN evA maiuqoHTalbot Rd SSEJonesRdSPugetDr
WS evA dniLEN evA eornoMEN evA sdnomdES 7th StNewcastle WayES evA ht611S evA ht78WellsAveSES evA ht841ES evA ht821SE 216th StBenson Rd
S SE183rdStSW 41st StSE 168th StEN evA noinUSW 7th StLakeWashingtonBlvdSEPuget Dr SESEMayValleyRdSW 34th StdR yellaV tsaESW 27th StE Valley Hwy84th Ave SS 216th StSouthcenterBlvdSE 192nd StS 228th St154thP l SE
S 132nd StN 3rd St64th Ave SyaW tserC dnalsIaPkwySE 208th St68th Ave SDuvall Ave NES129thStN 4th StSE 128th StInterurb
a
n
A
v
e
SRainier Ave SES evA ht421NE 4th StRa i n i e r Ave
N
4th
A
v eN
Co a l C r e e k P k w y S E
S212thWayNE 3rdStEMercerWay140th Ave SEOakesdale AveSWR e nton
A
v
e
S NParkDrSW 43rd StSECarrRdBeaconAve
S LoganAveNForest Dr SES 212th StSGradyWayN evA kraPES evA dn231ES evA ht651S 124thStES evA ht841Lakemont Blvd SE
ES evA ht611S 180th St66th Av
e
SES evA ht461AirportWaySWGrady WaySE 204th WayWMercerWayMonste rRdSWSEMayValley Rd140thWaySESE Petrovitsky RdNewcastleGolf ClubRd68thAveSS 133rd StUV169UV900UV515UV900UV181UV167¥405¥405¥405273845S 7th StSunsetBlvdNNE 23rd PlNESunsetBlvdSE 160th StNE 6th StNE 19th StN 30th StNE 10th StNE27thStSE 164th StPark Ave NS evA niaMNE 24th StEN evA ohcireJNE 10th StTalbot Rd SNE6thStNE 7th StMontereyAveNE125th Ave SEN 8th StNE 10th StNE 4th StSE 184th StNE9th StBeaconW ay SNE 2nd StRentonAveSN evA nedraGEN evA eliNGrant A v e
S SE 164th StES evA ht801HarringtonAve NENE12thStEN evA dnalkriKB e nson DrSSE Petrovitsky RdLa k e W ashingtonBlvd N
S dR toblaTBlack RiverRiparianForestCascade ParkCavanaugh PondNatural AreaCedar River Natural AreaCedarRiverParkCedar River toLake SammamishTrail SiteCedar RiverTrailCedar RiverTrail ParkCleveland /RichardsonPropertyCoalfieldParkCougar MountainRegionalWildland ParkEdlundPropertyFort DentFosterGolf CourseFutureSW AthleticComplexGene CoulonMemorial BeachParkGreenRiverTrailHoney CreekGreenwayLakeridgeParkMaplewoodCommunity ParkMaplewoodGolf CourseMaplewoodHeights ParkMayCreek/ McAskillMay CreekGreenwayMayValley CountyParkMcGarveyPark OpenSpaceMetroWaterworkParkNARCOPropertyPanther CreekWetlandsPetrovitskyParkRenton ParkRentonWetlandsRiverview ParkRon RegisParkSkywayParkSoosCreek Park andTrailSpringbrookTrailSpringbrookWatershed11234455667889910101111121213141415151617181919202021222324242425262828293031323334353637394041424344464747484849505152525455565657585960616262636364656566666767676868686970717273747475767777787979806335353 Lake WashingtonExisting TrailsShared Use PathStriped Bike LaneSigned Shared RoadwayPedestrian TrailProposed TrailsShared Use PathProtected Bike LaneStriped Bike LaneNeighborhood GreenwaySigned Shared RoadwayPedestrian TrailParks & Open Space^Community CenterLibraryPotential Transit HubnSchool°00.51 MilesProposed Project Number, Name1, 116th Avenue SE Bike Lanes2, 128th Avenue SE Bike Lanes3, 156th Avenue SE Bike Lanes4, Benson Drive S/108th Avenue SE Shared Use Path5, Benson Neighborhood Greenway6, Benson Road/Main Avenue S Bike Lanes7, Cascade Waterline Spur Trail8, Cedar to Sammamish Trail9, Duvall Avenue NE Bike Lanes10, East Valley Road Shared Use Path11, Eastside Rail Corridor12, Edmonds Avenue Connector13, Garden Avenue N Shared Use Path14, Glencoe Neighborhood Greenway15, Grant Avenue Neighborhood Greenway16, Hardie Avenue Bike Lane & Shared Use Path17, Harrington Ave NE Neighborhood Greenway18, Highlands Hillclimb19, Hillcrest Neighborhood Greenway20, Honey Creek Trail Extensions21, Houser Way and Factory Avenue22, Houser Way N Shared Use Path23, Jericho Avenue NE Bike Lanes24, Kennydale Neighborhood Greenway25, Kennydale Signed Shared Roadway26, Kenyon-Dobson Trail and Trailhead27, Lake to Sound Trail: East Segment28, Lake to Sound Trail: West Segment29, Lake Washington Loop Trail30, Langston Road/SW 134th Street Hillclimb31, Logan Avenue N Shared Use Path32, Maplewood Heights Neighborhood Greenway33, May Creek Hillclimb34, May Creek Trail35, May Valley Trail36, Mill Avenue S Signed Shared Roadway37, Monroe Avenue NE Bike Lanes38, N 4th Street Connector39, N 6th Street Bike Lanes40, N 8th Street Shared Use Path41, Naches Avenue Shared Use Path42, NE 3rd Street43, NE 4th Street Bike Lanes44, NE 12th Street Bike Lanes45, NE 16th Street Signed Shared Roadway46, NE Sunset Blvd Shared Use Path47, Nile Avenue NE Bike Lanes48, North Highlands Neighborhood Greenway49, North Southport Drive Shared Use Path50, Oakesdale Avenue Bike Lanes51, Pacific Railroad Trailhead & Trail52, Panther Creek Trail53, Powerline Trail54, Puget Drive Bike Lanes & Signed Shared Roadway55, Renton Connector56, Renton Park Neighborhood Greenway57, S 2nd Street Protected Bike Lanes58, S 3rd Street Signed Shared Roadway59, S/SW 7th Street Transit Connector60, Sam Chastain Waterfront Trail61, SE 168th Street Protected Bike Lanes62, SE 182nd & 184th Streets Neighborhood Greenway63, SE Petrovitsky Road Shared Use Path64, Seattle Waterline Spur Trail65, Seattle Waterline Trail66, Shattuck to Airport Connector67, Soos Creek Trail68, South Highlands Neighborhood Greenway69, Springbrook Trail70, Springbrook Trail Extension71, Sunset Boulevard Hillclimb72, SW 16th Street Shared Use Path73, SW 27th Street Connector74, Talbot Road S Bike Lanes75, Thunder Creek Trail76, Tiffany-Cascade Connector Trail77, Tiffany Park Neighborhood Greenway78, Tukwila Station Trail79, Union Avenue NE Bike Lanes80, Wells Avenue S Signed Shared RoadwayHighest Priorty ProjectExis�ng & Proposed Network and Project MapRenton Trails and Bicycle Master Plan 2019RESOLUTION NO. 4398
APPENDIX E: TRAILS MAP
248 | CITY OF RENTON
This page intentionally left blank
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
F
ADOPTING RESOLUTION
APPENDIX
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
250 | CITY OF RENTON
APPENDIx F: ADOPTING RESOLUTION
This page intentionally left blank
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 251
APPENDIx F: ADOPTING RESOLUTION
Placeholder for Adopting Resolution
RESOLUTION NO. 4398
252 | CITY OF RENTON
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS RESOLUTION NO. 4398