Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFinal Environmental Impact Statement (2/21/1992) •J FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT City of Renton Comprehensive Park, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan and Trails Master Plan February 21, 1992 Prepared for public review and comment in accordance with RCW 43.21C, the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 f i FACT SHEET Title: City of Renton Comprehensive Park, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan, and Trails Master.Plan. Proposal Description: The City of Renton has prepared, and intends .to adopt, a new Comprehensive Park, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan and a Trails Master Plan, both of which will provide substantial guidance in the development and enhancement of park and recreation services throughout the city in the coming years. The plans include potential new park sites open space areas, pedestrian and bicycle trails, bikeways, indoor facilities, recreation programs, administration and implementing actions. The draft plans were prepared following analysis of existing recreation facilities, population trends, and recreation demand and needs in the city. The public has been involved in the development of these plans through participation in public meetings and workshops, random household surveys, and advisory committees. Proponent: City of Renton, Renton Washington Lead Agency: City of Renton, Department of Community Development Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee, SEPA Official, City of Renton Contact Donald K. Erickson, ACIP, Zoning Administrator (Telephone Person: 235-2550) Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Required Agency Renton City Council Approval: Scoping_• A determination of significance was issued on September 17, 1990 and a notice of scoping for this EIS was published in the local newspaper. EIS Authors: JC Draggoo & Associates Jerry Draggoo Kevin Apperson Osprey Environlmental Services Ken Wilcox Date of Issue: October 16, 1991. Comments Due: November 19, 1991. Hearing Date: November 7, 1991. Location: City of Renton 2 j--I Final Action: Adoption of the plans by the Renton City Council. Subsequent Projects discussed in the park and trails plans may be subject to Review: further environmental review prior to development. Location of Renton Community Development Office Background • 200 Mill Avenue South ti Information: Renton, WA 98055 Cost of Draft Copies of thi EIS have been printed for public distribution EIS: free of charge. When this supply is exhausted, additional copies may be purchased for the cost of printing plus tax. • • lY 1 � 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page UPDATED FACT SHEET INTRODUCTION Introduction 1 SUMMARY Summary 1 SECTION 1. EIS REVISIONS Section I-1 SECTION 2. COMMENT LETTERS AND RESPONSES Section II-1 SECTION 3. PUBLIC HEARING COMMENTS AND RESPONSES Section III-1 APPENDICES Distribution List DL-1 The appendices for this document are the same as those found in the DEIS 4 INTRODUCTION Comprehensive Park Recreation and Open Spac Plan/Trails Master Plan City of Renton Final EIS INTRODUCTION This document, in conjunction with the Draft EIS, comprises the Final EIS for the City's Comprehensive Park, Recreation and Open Space Plan and Trails Master Plan. The proposed Comprehensive Park and Recreation Plan and Master Trails Plan would guide the future acquisition, development and enhancement of parks, trails and recreation services throughout the Renton area. These plans include recommendations for new park sites, open space areas, trails, bikeways, indoor facilities, specialized facilities as well as changes in recreation programs. The City has reviewed the comments received on the Draft EIS. In compliance with WAC 197-11-560 of the SEPA rules, the City is issuing this Final EIS. The Final EIS is organized into five major sections. The first section (Introduction) contains this introduction. The second section (Summary) contains a revised summary of the EIS. The third section (Section One) includes revisions to the text. The fourth section (Section Two) includes all the written comments received on the Draft EIS and responses to these comments. The Final section (Section Three) acknowledges the public hearing. The appendices include the distribution list for this document. • 11 1 -, S ' Introduction - 1 SUMMARY { r " � I Comprehensive Park Recreation and Open Space Plan/Trails Master Plan City of Renton Final EIS SUMMARY Description of Proposed Action The City of Renton intends to adopt a new Comprehensive Park and Recreation Master Plan and a Trails Master Plan. If adopted, the two plans will guide future acquisition, development and enhancement of parks, trails and recreation services throughout the Renton area. These plans include recommendations for new park sites, open space areas, trails, bikeways, indoor facilities, specialized facilities as well as changes in recreation programs. These two draft plans were prepared following the analysis of existing recreation facilities, population trends, and recreation demand and needs in the city. The public has been involved in the development of these plans through participation in public meetings and workshops, random household surveys, and advisory committees. The purpose of the two plans is to provide guidance to the Park and Recreation Department on the future decision affecting park a d recreation services. To achieve this, the Parks Department has established several goal and objectives. The following alternatives, to a varying degree, provide different approaches to reaching these goals. Alternatives - I The proposed plans identified above constitute Alternative A, the preferred alternative. In addition, three other alternatives are discussed in this EIS. Alternative B assumes minimum development of identified sites and shifts Fthe planning emphasis away from development and toward preservation of selected sites for public open space. Alternative C maintains the proposed development concepts, but foil a reduced number of sites and facilities. Alternative D, the no action alternative, assumes that no plan will be adopted. Under this alternative, future programs and facilities will be provided according to the 1984 Comprehensive Park and Recreation Plan. Each of these alternatives is fully described in Sections 3.1, 3.2 and 3.3 of the draft EIS issued on October 16, 19'91. Environmental Impacts and Mitigating Measures The adoption of the proposed Comprehensive Park and Recreation Master Plan and Trails Master Plan do not result in direct impacts to the environment. However, the gradual implementation of various recommendations in the plan may result in some impacts on the ' natural and human environments. Potential impacts and mitigating measures are fully described in Section 4. These are summarized below: Soils and Topography - Minor soil, slope and topography disturbances will result from park and trail development under the two plans. Steep slopes could be destabilized during construction by cuts or fills, drainage modifications, disturbance to vegetation, and other factors. Increased runoff over new impervious surfacing can lead to soil erosion and stream sedimentation. Landslide hazards are a serious concern and present a potential danger to parks, trails and adjacent properties. ' All trail corridors include areas where problem soils on moderate to very steep slopes are Summary - 1 Comprehensive Park Recreation and Open Space Plan/Trails Master Plan City of Renton Final EIS likely to be encountered. Bicycle routes tend to avoid steep areas. Bicycles can also impact soils and induce erosion on trails if not designed for their use. To minimize impacts the plans recommend a variety of-design criteria and development standards which along with normal construction practices should adequately mitigate against unnecessary soil disturbances; and weakening of slopes. Soil limitations will require site specific engineering in some areas. )load and utility planning and improvement projects should be coordinated with bicycle and pedestrian facilities, particularly where steep slopes exist above or below a proposed grade. Air Quality - New air emissions will be generated by construction activities as well as users of new parks and trails who access these areas by automobile. Some vehicle emissions will simply be redistributed, since a portion of the use could be expected to visit other existing facilities if new sites were not developed. Emissions may be offset or possibly reduced if a significant number of commuters were to turn to the non-motorized trail system for at least a portion of their daily travel needs. Dust from construction and vehicle movement over unpaved surfaces require some mitigation. As a rule, accepted techniques for dust control during construction, operation and maintenance of facilities would be routinely implemented. Hard surfacing of access roads and parking areas is planned for all parks and most trail heads accessible by car. Bike lanes and bikeways would be paved as well. Surface water and wetlands - Some disturbance to streams, water bodies and wetlands would occur resulting in minor water quality impacts from erosion and sedimentation. Trails involve minor water crossings that could affect surface drainage and ground water. Many trails encounter wetland areas or parallel stream corridors or lake shorelines created from human and construction activities producing a potential for impacts on water quality and movement, as well as plants and animals. Despite the variety of problems that can arise, no specific project-related effects have been identified. Accepted design standards, construction practices and regular maintenance will be crucial to the protection of water resources. The plans contain standards that address these issues. Groundwater - Groundwater impacts will be minimal as a result of trail and park development under the new plans. The primary issue related to groundwater is the potential contamination to the aquifer from trails and facilities in the aquifer recharge areas, which supplies 95% of the city's drinking waer. Impacts could potentially occur as a result of the over use and storage of chemicals related to parks and trails maintenance in aquifer recharge areas. These substances should be used in strict compliance to application quantity and methods. Fertilizers, herbicides and pesticides used in the recharge areas should be selected to minimize the potential for contamination of groundwater by considering factors such as biodegradability, persistence, mobility, application base, time of application, concentration, and quantity applied. Alternatives to the use of chemicals and fertilizers should also be encouraged. Storage of these types ,of chemicals should be located outside the aquifer recharge areas. In addition, a monitoring system should be set up to check water quality and pesticide, herbicides and fertilizers levels in ground water. Summary-2 Comprehensive Park �eation an Open Space Plania,;ls Master Plan City of Renton Final EIS Plants and animals - Impacts to existing plant communities will be minimal as a result of trail and park development under the proposed plans. However, the loss of some existing wildlife habitat and foraging opportunities can be expected from both development of facilities and increased human use of areas that are presently inaccessible. A few wetland and riparian areas could be altered slightly by boardwalks or nature trails. Full development of the city- wide park plan could result in a reduction in quality of wildlife habitat of approximately 180 acres. • Clearing of trees and potential impacts to the Black River heron rookery is a major concern although no development is,planned within the immediate area. The proposed Black River Trail could lead the public via observation trails into a portion of the buffer area. The effects of people observing the rookery from this location are uncertain. The main trails and structures should be located outside the heron buffer, with human activity in the buffer area restricted during the breeding season. Buffer areas should also be maintained along the perimeter of wetlands, streams and around sensitive habitat areas. Trees and vegetation should be planted in disturbed areas, along trails or parks that are adjacent to neighborhoods, around parking area and around vehicle The areas. landscaping will maintain privacy for the adjacent residents and provide a screen from adjacent roads and properties. Areas that do not require clearing of vegetation should be retained in their natural condition. Timing of construction activity should be coordinated to avoid disturbances to fish and wildlife duringcritical spawning, nestingand rearing periods. Application of pesticides, herbicides and chemicalfertilizers should be avoided or carefully controlled to prevent harmful effects to water quality and wildlife. Undisturbed native ecosystems, such as the Oregon Ash forest on the Black River, small areas of old growth along the Cedar River and elsewhere should be protected from development through land acquisition and the planning review process. Scenic and aesthetic quality-Aesthetic impacts from trail development are limited to a linear disturbance of vegetation and soils, and the placement of parking areas or small structures (small buildings, bridges, culverts, stairs, etc.) in undeveloped areas. Some trails might be visible from a distance or from adjacent properties. However,this impact should be minimal. By default, trails tend to enhance scenic and aesthetic opportunities by.providing public .access to open space areas, natural features and views that may not otherwise exist. Careful routing of trails, adherence to accepted design standards and construction techniques can help to avoid adverse impacts. Environmental health - Park and trail development under the plans could result in public health and safety related impacts if not adequately mitigated. The fans contain policy statements and design standards intended to minimize these impacts. These include, in part, separation between foot and bicycle traffic and motorized and non-motorized traffic. Site specific safety issues need to be addressed at the design stage. Property owners adjacent to proposed projects may have concerns with vandalism, littering, invasion of privacy, and reduced property values. A study of similar issues along the Burke-Gilman trail in Seattle suggests these impacts are not significant. Studies suggest that long term exposure to electromagnetic fields along transmission lines may adversely affect human health; Trails proposed in the plan along power line corridors pose a much shorter term exposure than for people who live or work near them, thus the Summary-3 I ' Comprehensive Park Recreation and Qpen Space Plan/Trails Master Plan City of Renton Final EIS j the plan, trails should be located outside the immediate area of the power lines whenever possible. Appropriate safety and security measures such as design, fencing and signage should be used to deter climbing, eiposure to injury and vandalism near towers. Electric power purveyors should be consulted to determine appropriate locations and improvements. City staff should stay current with research by BPA and others and keep informed on EMF policy development in King County. Facilities or routes should be altered to assure public safety if current and/or future studies indicate more than a casual link between low level EMF and various forms of illness. Noise - New trail development will not produce significant noise levels. All will be managed for non-motorized use. Some traffic noise will emanate from new trail heads although most are located in existing or proposed parks. Increased traffic or trail user noise in quiet residential areas is not anticipated to be significant Parking areas should be designed, located and or buffered to minimize noise impacts for nearby residents. Trails are recommended to be located far enough away from residences to avoid disturbances caused by trail users. Land and shoreline use - Full implementation over ten years or more would dramatically enhance city-wide park and trail systems. In most areas, trails should be compatible with adjacent uses, although potential conflicts could occur in some areas. The privacy and security of private property owners must be carefully considered during the design and construction of facilities. The City must decide, case by case, whether a particular project is appropriate under the circumstances.If a purchase or easement is required but cannot be achieved, facilities may need to be redesigned, postponed or eliminated. Adoption of the plan does not imply that all projects must be developed. Light and glare - Development will not produce any significant adverse impacts from light and glare, with the possible exception of car lights at some locations and overall lighting levels at the proposed sports field complex. Lighting should be directed downward and shielded to prevent glare for traffic or neighbonng properties. Vegetative screening and other design techniques can also help mitigate potential impacts. Outdoor lighting should be installed at trail heads as needed to discourage vandalism and assure user safety. Housing- Some disturbances to adjacent housing would occur resulting in loss of privacy and security, noise and visual impacts. This primarily occurs as a result of park and trail development. Trails follow linear corridors that are located relatively close to or abut residential areas. Likewise, park development may also occur in close proximity or even abut residential uses. Landscaping can be used to improve the aesthetic appearance of parks and trails and to buffer the views of these facilities from adjacent residential development. Commercial and Industrial Development - Park and trail development under the plans could result in security and safety related impacts if not adequately mitigated. Increased lighting, accessibility and security would help Imitigate potential impacts. Site specific safety issues need to be addressed at the design stage. Property owners adjacent to proposed projects may have concerns with vandalism, littering, trespassing and increased security. Recreation - Adoption of the Plans will essentially enhance recreation opportunities for the public. No significant adverse impacts have been identified in connection with the Plans. If new sites are not developed, use of existing facilities will increase with population growth, resulting in an increase in maintenance responsibilities, crowding and potential degradation of existing facilities. Trails interconnecting with adjacent cities or the King County network ' Summary-4 Comprehensive Park Recreation and Open Space Plan/Trails Master Plan City of Renton Final EIS have been carefully planned to assure a coordinated regional system of trails. Historic preservation - No known historical or archaeological sites would be adversely impacted by the plans. If discovered during construction,such sites could be damaged if not immediately recognized. Sites that could be considered as having a high potential for historical or archaeological significance may require an archaeologist to be on-site during the construction phase. Upon the discovery of any artifacts, work should be stopped and city officials or the Washington State Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation would be notified. Traffic and parking - Potential conflicts between trail users and motorized traffic exist. The Plan suggests that these issues should be considered during long and short term transportation planning efforts. A Trail Standards Matrix offering facility and dimensional standards will help resolve many public safety concerns. Bike lanes are proposed where necessary to minimize hazardous conditions for bicycles that must share the streets with automobiles. The need for additional right of way varies a great deal throughout the City and will be addressed on a project by project basis. Maintenance - New park and trail development will increase the need for maintenance within the park system, and for city streets where bike lanes are provided. Construction activity within utility corridors may interfere with trails or present a safety concern to be addressed. Conversely, trail development may impact maintenance operations within the utility corridor. Design of trails should include features that will help minimize maintenance costs over the long term. Trails and bridges should be wide enough for maintenance vehicles to access and be designed by a professional engineer. Separate easements are needed along utility corridors. Waste disposal - As parks and trail heads develop under the proposed plans, the volume of waste to be managed will likely increase slightly. Litter along trails can be expected but volumes are expected to be small and not beyond the means of the Park Department to manage. Trash containers will be provided in appropriate locations. Regular maintenance will be provided with all new park and trail development. Litter control personnel presently help collect litter discarded on streets and trails throughout the city. This effort should continue and be expanded if the need becomes apparent. Well maintained parks and trails tend to foster a greater appreciation of facilities and a concern for the natural environment. Again, it is important to note that the adoption of the proposed Comprehensive Park and Recreation Master Plan and Trails Master Plan do not result in direct impacts to the environment. However, the gradual implementation of various recommendations in the plan may result in some impacts on the natural and human environments. These potential impacts and mitigating measures that may occur as a result of project implementation. Implementation will be more fully addressed at the time specific proposals (project actions) are submitted for environmental review. Summary -5 SECTION ONE EIS REVISIONS Comprehensive Park Recreation and Open Space Plan/Trails Master Plan City of Renton Final EIS EIS REVISIONS This section contains the revisions to the Draft EIS. Included are factual corrections identified by agencies, organizations, and/or individuals who commented on the Draft EIS as well as corrections identified by the con ultants. Supplemental information that improves or modifies the analysis contained in the Draft EIS is also presented in response to comments received. These revisions are organized in page order according to the chapters and subsections of the Draft DEIS. Revisions to the Text FACT SHEET See the updated Fact Sheet in this FEIS. SECTION 1. SUMMARY See the updated summary in this FEIS. SECTION 2. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED ACTION No changes SECTION 3. DESCRIPTION OF ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS No changes SECTION 4. AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT, SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS,AND MITIGATION MEASURES 4.1.1 Soils, Geology and Topography Page IV-8 In the first paragraph under mitigation measures, the last sentence should be revised to read: Along streams, vegetation, riprap or other techniques may be necessary to stabilize streams banks against erosion. Section I- 1 Comprehensive Park, Recreation and Open Space Plan/Trails Master Plan City of Renton Final EIS 4.1.3 Surface Water,Aquifer Recharge Areas and Wetlands Page IV-18 In the first paragraph under mitigation measures, insert the following after the end of the first sentence: In some cases additional mitigation measures may be required. These additional measures to control erosion would need to be determined on a case by case basis. 4.1.4 Plants and Animals Page IV-25 In the last paragraph under significant unavoidable adverse impacts, add the following after the last sentence: In all these alternatives, staff will attempt to preserve wildlife habitat in contiguous corridors where feasible. I ' Section I - 2 SECTION TWO COMMENT LETTERS AND RESPONSES . Comprehensive Park, Recreation and Open Space Plan/Trails Master Plan City of Renton Final EIS COMMENT LETTERS AND RESPONSES In this section,written comment receives on the Comprehensive Park, Recreation and Open Space Plan and the Trails Master Plan afire presented as well as the City of Renton responses to these comments. The City's response's follow each comment letter. All original letters are filed with the City of Renton's Development Services Division. According to Washington Administrativie Code (WAC) 197-11-550, comments on a Draft EIS are meant to be as specific as possible and may address either the adequacy of the document and/or the merits of the alternatives.,SuI ch comments may include criticism of the analysis methodology, the existence of additional information not considered in the Draft EIS, or the appropriateness of listed mitigation measures. The\lead agency shall consider the comments on the proposed project and respond. Accbrdirb to WAC 197-11-560, adequate responses may include the following: modify alternatives; develop and evaluate alternatives not previously given detailed consideration; supplement, improve, or modify analysis; make factual corrections; or explain why the comments do not warrant further response. Written comments were received from the following: Government Agencies Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) Washington State Department of Ecology Washington State Department of Fisheries (WDF) Citizens Julie Bonwell It is important to understand that the Comprehensive Park, Recreation and Open Space Plan and Trails Master Plan are programmatic in nature. Many of the following comments address specific issues and concerns that will be evaluated and addressed as the individual projects are implemented. it 1 S-ction I1- 1 - _ �..... c�•+i .._ --' �..- lU• )�rniI ..ycD r.CG I Adak � Washington State Duane Berentson �// Department of Transportation sc::rr.:nryofTran;pori:l:irni District 1 15325 S.E. 3och Bellevue,Wa;hingto11 980(1/ 6.)3$ (20(3)562-4000 November 18, 1991 Ms. Lynn A. Guttmann, Chair - :�,,•: Environmental Review Committee "= - Planning/Building/Public Works Department 200 Mill Avenue South -�. v Renton, WA 98055 City of Renton Comprehensive Park, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan and Trails Master Plan DEIS Review Comments Dear Ms. Guttmann: This letter is in response to the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) issued by the City for the proposed Comprehensive Park, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan and Trails Master Plan. If adopted, the plan would provide "substantial guidance in the development and enhancement of park and recreation services throughout the city in the coming years. " Included in the plan are "potential new park sites, open space areas, pedestrian and bicycle trails, bikeways, indoor facilities, recreation programs, administra- tion and implementing actions. " Our comments regarding the DEIS for this proposal are as follows: 1. As indicated in the DEIS, the proposed comprehensive master plans are programmatic in nature and do not create tangible impacts until specific projects from the plans are developed and implemented. The Traffic and Parking Section of the DEIS recognizes that significant challenges, difficulties and safety issues will need to be addressed when various projects are constructed. As each specific project is implemented, a more detailed ' analysis of potential traffic impacts will be necessary and appropriate mitigation measures identified. 2. When projects are developed that have an impact on state highways, we would appreciate having a chance to review the proposal and ! recommend appropriate mitigation measures, if necessary. We are especially interested in the park and trail projects identified in the plans that are located near, !adjacent to or that cross state highway corridors. Ms. Lynn A. Guttmann, Chair , DEIS Review Comments November 18, 1991 Page 2 Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the DEIS for the proposed Comprehensive Park, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan and Trails Master Plan. If you have any questions concerning these remarks, please contact Mr. David Oberg of my staff at 562-4106. Sincerely, c9-Z JERRY B. SCHUTZ Assistant Manager for Route Planning DAO: la 33/do-trail L . Comprehensive Park, Recreation and Open Space Plan/Trails Master Plan City of Renton Final EIS Response to Jerry Schultz, State of Washington Department of Transportation [Letter Number 1] Comment 1: The City concurs with comment number 1. Your comment is acknowledged and incorporated in to the Final EIS. Comment 2: The implementation of various project will require the participation of public and private agencies. All affected agencies will have the opportunity to comment on the design, development, location and other particulars of park and trail projects. Section II- 3 srar� • I f CURT.ShtITCH `~ ��� y Director ,,f p�,tl-, . , STATE OF WASHIf`GT CI i e. ,;",,' !1�� CN DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE 16018 Mill Creek Blvd., Mill Creek. WA 98012 , Tel..(_06) 775-�31{'�.Y:II'i�JIVrs;OrJ OF CITY ^ _ �' r,�NTON i,� November 12, 1991 a • :v. ! Lynn A. Guttmann, Chair Environmental Review Committee Planning/Building/Public Works Department 1 Attention: Don Erickson, S 'cretary 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 RE: ECF-109-90; COMPREHENSI PARK AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN; DEIS The Department of Wildlife recommends management of the city parks o along the lines of Alternative B. This would place the key emphasis on the open space and more n tural element of the park lands. The benefits of this are greater passive or appreOiative opportunity, less impact on the native vegetation and rindigenous l wildlife and would be less eipensive. The need to develop some of the parks to provide active uses; e.g. , organized sports courts/fields mwill ore become intensive,apparent 0 over time. Further'develo went c individual basis and as the leedarisesn be considered on an As park sites are developed for public mmend such as boardwalks and nature trails notbe placedgingco wetland areastorngs buffers. Trails and interpretive facilities should be designed to 411 provide observation opportunities without encroaching on sensitive habitat. Mitigation should be proposed for any unavoidable loss of wildlife habitat. Mitigation may be in the form of enhancement of existing but poor quality habitat, additional buffering for sensitive areas or A acquisition of sensitive areas in jeopardy of being lost. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this proposal. Sincerely, ? ..--. 6) Ton Oppermann Habitat Biologist i cc: Habitat, Olympia ; i 3 Comprehensive Park,Recreation and Open Space Plan/Trails Master Plan Ciry of Renton Final EIS Response to Tony Oppermann, State of Washington, Department of Wildlife [Letter Number 3] Comment 1: The City recognizes the Department of Wildlife's recommendation of Alternative B. It is important to note that both Alternative A and B recommend an equivalent number of acres for open space preservation. Under both alternatives, the amount of land devoted strictly to open space amounts to roughly 1,200_acres. Alternative B, however recommends a reduced level of development to sites identified for active recreational uses, such neighborhood parks, community parks and some special use areas. This does not necessarily mean that fewer sites will be developed, but rather development will be limited to less intensive uses such as trails and picnic areas. Overall, a greater percentage of the site would be left in a natural and undisturbed state. Much of this land wil I be used for passive and appreciative recreational opportunities. Comment 2: The need to develop additional active use areas has been addressed in section VI of the Comprehensive Park and Recreation Plan. According to the Plan, there is already a need for additional intensive, active recreational opportunities. By limiting development of new active recreational areas, it places greater den1iand and use on existing areas and facilities. This could potentially result in the overuse and degradation of existing park and recreation facilities. Additional population growth could create additional demand for park and recreational facilities. By developing and dispersing new recreational facilities through out the community, it will alleviate the dem1 nd on existing facilities as well as meeting the needs of future populations. Comment 3: The implementation of various project will require the participation of public and private agencies. All affected agencies will have the opportunity to comment on the design, development, location and other particulars of park and trail projects. At which time the city will consider all concerns related to wildlife and habitat preservation. Comment 4: Mitigation will take place in the case of unavoidable loss of wildlife habitat. Specific forms of mitigation will be explored and implem nted as individual projects are underway. Mitigation could include but not limited to: o Buffer areas around sensitive habitats o Vegetative planting and buffering o Minimize clearing and grading o Implement nest box prog;am o Time construction to minimize disturbances to fish and wildlife o Siting of facilities to minimize disturbance to fish and wildlife o Minimize use of pesticides and chemical fertilizers } • Section II- 5 • � �STAT► 11. IOSE?H R. BLUM Director STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISHERIES 775 General Administration Building, M.S. AX-11 • Olympia, Washington 98504 • (205) 753-6600 • (SCAN) 254-6600 October 28, 1991 PL;'4'�''�i' DIViSV • V V . Environmental Review Committee ATTENTION: Don Erickson Development Planning Section Department of Planning/Building/public Works 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 SUBJECT: Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) - City of Renton Comprehensive Park, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan and Trails Master Plan - Various Streams, Tributary to Lake Washington, King County, WDF SEPA Log No . 16144, WRIA 08 .MISC Dear Mr . Erickson: The Washington Department of Fisheries (WDF) has received the above-referenced proposal and has the following comments . The Comprehensive Park and Recreation Master Plan and the Trails Master Plan were not included for review. Copies of those plans will be needed for a more detailed response. Overall, Alternative B is the preferred alternative in terms of protection of streams, wetlands and fish life . Specific comments on the DEIS follow by page reference : Page I-3, 2nd Para . : Buffer areas should also be maintained along the perimeter of streams as well as wetlands . Page I-5, Waste disposal : Particularly along streams, WDF has observed large volumes of trash and debris, ranging from household garbage to commercial waste . Paved trails wide enough for vehicle access will facilitate the unauthorized dumping of trash and debris into wetlands and stream corridors. Page IV-8 . Mitigating Measures : Setbacks and buffers should be maintained along streams, wetlands and steep slopes. Trails should not be placed within these buffers and setbacks . Use of riprap along stream banks is discouraged. A vegetative approach to bank stabilization is preferred. If the stream bank or slope is so unstable as to require retaining walls, another trail alignment should be explored. Page IV-15, last para . Floodplains/Floodways : Through the SEPA process WDF can extend itsjauthority beyond the high water mark of the stream or wetland. Activities which "use, divert, change 4 or obstruct the flow or bed of the stream" are subject to Hydraulic Project Approval.' • • Don Erickson October 28, 1991 Page 2 Pape IV-16 , Impacts: Increased impervious surfaces due to the trail, parking or other facilities will also be a long term impact. Both water quantity and quality concerns will need to be 5 addressed. Alternatives to the use of herbicides, pesticides, and fertilizers should be explored and utilized. Page IV-18, Mitigation Measures : Standard construction erosion control practices are often not adequate . BMP 's, silt fencing for example, need to be examined and adjusted where needed on a daily basis . If it 's railning, they may need to be examined more frequently. Construction projects within sensitive areas such as streams, wetlands, and steep slopes will require erosion control practices, includingevaluation tion of the effectiveness of those . practices, that may be more restrictive and certainly more creative than under other circumstances . Page IV-23, Mitigation Measures : A minimum buffer of 100 feet should be required for wetlands and streams . Page IV-25, Significant Unavoidable Adverse Impacts : Undisturbed corridors should be contiguous wherever possible. Fragmentation results in adverse impac s to wildlife. Page IV-36, Land and Shoreline Use : Stream and wetland setbacks and buffers will be needed. Healthy streams require vegetated corridors to provide temperature attenuation, erosion control, woody debris for habitat structure, and a food base for fish. The proposed trail system and park facilities will increase the �r human intrusion into that corridor. Impacts to spawning salmon, including poaching, erosion, and trash deposition, are increased when stream access is facilitated. Proposed trails should primarily be placed upslope of buffers and setbacks, with limited, but controlled access into the buffer for educational purposes. • Thank you for the opportunity to comment. If you have any questions regarding these comments, please contact me at (206) 392-7190. Sincerely, >6'4/k Gayle Kreitman Regional Habitat Manager Habitat Management Division cc: WDF - Olympia Comprehensive Park Recreation and Open Space Plan/Trails Master Plan City of Renton Final EIS ' I Response to Gayle Kreitman, State of Washington, Department of Fisheries [Letter Number 4] Comment 1: The City concurs with comment numbe i 1. Wherever possible, a buffer should be maintained along the perimeter of steams and wetlands. In accordance with existing City ordinances, a minimum 25'wide corridor (buffer)is required adjacent to all streams and wetlands. The minimum buffer could be increased if the wetland/stream was determined to be a significant wetland/stream Comment 2: As indicated in the Draft EIS, the proposed comprehensive plans are programmatic in nature and do not create tangible impacts. In some areas of the City, illegal dumping has occurred along streams when these areas are developed. It should be noted that steps will be taken to discourage this practice. The City is required to provide for police and emergency response in all areas of the City. At times it may be necessary to provide a paved trail into areas that will allow the passage of emergency vehicles. When these trails are designed, City staff will take measures to ensure that t access to the trails are limited to maintenance, emergency and police vehicles only. Comment 3: The City concurs with comment number 3. Location and design issues will be addressed at the time of individual project implementation. Comment 4: Your comment is acknowledged and incorporated in to this Final EIS. Comment 5: Again, the proposed comprehensive plans are programmatic in nature and do not create tangible impacts. Specific water quality issues and concerns as a result of increased impervious surfaces will be addressed oh an individual basis. Appropriate mitigating measures will be evaluated at that timef Comment 6: The City concurs with comment #6. Mitigating measure specific to project implementation and construction practices will be evaluated on individual basis at the time of development. Comment 7: The City will consider appropriate mitigating measures at the time of project implementation. It should be noted that the City of Renton is developing a wetland ordinance. The ordinance will include criteria for preserving,protecting and restoring wetlands. The ordinance,which is based upon the 1989 definition for wetlands,will also establish buffers and allowable uses within buffers. Once this ordinance is adopted all projects adjacent to wetlands will need to comply. Comment 8: The City concurs with comment#8. Wherever possible,vegetative corridors should maintain their integrity. Specific issues and concern about habitat corridors will be addressed as project implementation occurs. Section II- 7 Comprehensive Park, Recreation and Open Space Plan/Trails Master Plan City of Renton Final EIS Comment 9: The City concurs with comment #9. Yizur comment is acknowledged and incorporated in to this Final EIS. Section II- 8 i PTT! • November 12 , 1991 Lynn A. Guttmann, Chair Environmental Review Committee Planning/Building/Public Works Dept. Attn: Don Erickson, Secretary 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Re: City of Renton Draft EIS Comprehensive Park, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan and Trails Master Plan Dear Mr. Erickson: Having had the recent opportunity to review the draft EIS regarding the City of Renton Comprehensive Park, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan and Trails Master Plan, I was not surprised to see that trails for equestrian use had not been addressed. On behalf of equestrians within and without the City of Renton, particularly those of May Valley, request is hereby made that trails with horse use be implemented wherever feasible. The equestrians of May Valley have been working with Timm Gustine of King County Parks Department in the planning of May Valley Community Park proposed for development next year. While we do not necessarily ag1ee with the County's inclination to develop the bulk of 50 acres for playing fields with the resulting loss of substantial numbers of trees and increased flooding potential of the Valley floor, the County is most anxious and willing to have the park be multi-use. Horse trails will be incorporated throughout the park, parking for horse trailers will be provided, and an arena will be built for public use. May Valley is saturated with equestrians of all ages. There are at least seven private boarding stables in the immediate area with boarding capacity of 12 to 50 horses each. Because of a lack of planning in the past, horse owners are almost to a point where a trailer ride foresees any trail ride. - • I am eager to see the City of Renton working with King County and the local equestrian groups in developing and defining a network of trails for the horse owner. Trails established through Devils Elbow and the May Creek Open Space with access over Goat Mountain to theiCougar Mt. State Park for equestrians as well as the general public should be defined. Horses are our way of life and it is important that they not be withheld from viable trail networks. Please let me know if I can be of further assistance. Thank you. SX,I.4.166( Ju ie IP. Bonwell 9616 146th Ave SE Renton, WA 98059 (206) 271-0680/624-1040 Comprehensive Park, Recreation and Open Space Plan/Trails Master Plan City of Renton Final EIS Response to Julie Bonwell [Letter Number 2] Comment 1: Although horse trails have not been specifically identified, the planning and design for equestrian use has been considered in the planning process. The Comprehensive Park and Recreation Plan state on page VIII-8 th t " multi-use trails are designed for the following activities: bicycle riding, mountain bike riding, walking and hiking and horseback riding." As the planning and design of an individual project occurs, the public including equestrian users will have an opportunity participate. Equestrian use will be taken in to consideration where it is feasible, particularly in the May Valle area. Comment 2: The implementation of various trail projects will require the participation of public and private agencies. All affected agencies, including King County Parks Department,will have the opportunity to comment on the design, do:'elopment, location and other particulars of park and trail projects. Since portion ofj May Creek Park are owned by both King County Parks and Renton Parks and Recreation Department, any major trail development will require extensive,planning and coordination between the two agencies. , Section Il- 10 SECTION THREE PUBLIC HEARING COMMENTS AND RESPONSES i I Conprehensive Park, Recreation and Open Space Plan/Trails Master Plan City of Renton Final EIS PUBLIC HEARIN COMMENTS AND RESPONSES A public hearing was held on Novemb-r 7 to receive comments on the Draft EIS prepared for the Comprehensive Park, Recreatio and Open Space Plan and the Trails Master Plan. It should be noted that there was no publi testimony was given at this hearing. rl Se,tion III 1 APPENDIX APPENDICES Comprehensive Park, Recreation and Open Space Plan/Trails Master Plan City of Renton Final EIS DISTRIBUTION LIST Federal Agencies: Attn: Office of Environmental Health Programs Environmental Protection Agency Environmental Evaluation Branch Washington Department of Ecology 1200-6th Avenue Environmental Review Section " Seattle, WA 98101 Olympia, WA 98504 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Washington Department of Fisheries- Seattle District Office Natural Production Division Engineering Division-Planning 115 General Administration Bldg. P.O. Box C-3755 Olympia, WA 98504 Seattle, WA 98124 Attn: Joe Roble U.S. Dept. of Housing and Urban Washington Department of Ecology Development Northwest Regional Office Arcade Plaza Building 4350 -150th 13212nd Avenue Redmond, WA 98052 Seattle, WA 98101 Attn: EIS Review Attn: Mr. Nishimura Office of Program Planning& Fiscal B.P.A. - U.S. D.O.E. Review Terrace G. Esfelt, Mgr. 101 House Office Building Puget Sound Area Office Olympia, WA 98504 P.O. Box C-10030. Attn: EIS Review Seattle, WA 98109-1030 Washington Department of Transportation U.S. Dept. of Agriculture Highway Administration Bldg. • Soil Conservation Service Olympia, WA 98504 Renton Field Office 935 Powell SW Washington Department of Energy Renton, WA 98055 Richard H. Watson, Director 809 Legion Way SE U.S. Fish and Wildlife Department Olympia, WA 98504 121 107th NE Bellevue, WA Interagency Committee for Outdoor Recreation 4800 Capitol Blvd. State Agencies: Tumwater, Washington Washington Department of Wildlife Washington State Parks and Recreation Ecological Services Office Commission 2625 Parkmont Lane • 7150 Cleanwater Lane Olympia, WA 98504 Olympia, WA 98504 Attn: David Heiser, Environmental Washington Department of Social & . Review Health Services 1112 So. Quince Office of Archaeology and Historic Olympia, WA 98504 Preservation ' DL - 1 Comprehensive Park, Recreation and Open Space Plan/Trails Master Plan City of Renton Final EIS 111 W 21st 3600 136th P1. SE Olympia, WA 98504 Bellevue, WA 98006-1400 King County Soil Conservation Service Regional Agencies: 935 Powell Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055 Metro • Attn: Jack Davis Water Quality Division 821 Second Avenue EIS Review Coordinator Seattle, WA 98104-1598 King County Courthouse Room 400 516 Third Avenue Metro Seattle, WA 98104 Transit Division Attn: EIS Review 821 Second Avenue Seattle, WA 98104-1598 City of Renton: Metro . • Environmental Planning Division Mayor's Office 821 Second Avenue, MS-63 Seattle, WA 98104 City Council Seattle-King County Dept. of Public Hearing Examiner's Office Health 400 Yesler Building Planning Commission Seattle, WA 98101 Parks Board Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency 200 West Mercer St. -Rm. 205 Department of Planning/Building/Public Seattle, WA 98119-3958 Works Puget Sound Council of Government Community Services Department 126 First Avenue South Seattle, WA 98104 Police Department Fire Department County Agencies: City Attorney King County Parks, Planning and Natural Resources Department SEPA Information Center 1108 Smith Tower i 506 Second Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 Other: • King County Greater Renton Chamber of Commerce • Planning Division 300 Rainier N. 6th Floor, Smith Tower Renton, WA 98055 Seattle, WA 98104 Renton School District #403 Building and Land Development- Office 435 Main Avenue South of Zoning and Subdivision Examiner Renton, WA 98055 • (SEPA Information Center) DL - 2 r ' I ' Comprehensive Park, Recreation and Open Space Plan/Trails Al aster Plan City of Renton Final EIS Seattle Times - Eastside Edition 31620 23rd S Suite 312 City of Seattle Federal Way, WA 980.03 Planning Department 600 4th Avenue Seattle Post - Intelligencer Seattle, WA 98104 101 Elliott Avenue W Seattle, WA • City of Bellvue 11511 Main Street Daily Journal of Commerce PO Box 90012 • 83 Columbia Bellevue, WA 98009 Seattle, WA Nature Conservancy Valley Daily News 1601 2nd Avenue 212 Wells S Suite 101 Seattle, WA 98101 Renton, WA Seattle Audoton Society Journal American 619 Joshua Green Building 1705 23rd Ave NE Seattle, WA 98101 Bellevue, WA Friends of the Earth Renton Public Library NW Office 100 Mill South 4512 University Way N.E. Renton, WA Seattle, WA 98105 King County Public Library (Skyway) 7614 S 126th Seattle, WA King County Public Library (Fairwood) - . 17009 140th SE Renton, WA Puget Sound Power & Light Co. South Central Division Office 620 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Attn: EIS Review City of Kent Planning Department 220-4th Avenue S " Kent, WA 98032-5895 Muckleshoot Tribe Council 39015 - 172 Ave. SE Auburn, WA 98002 N City of Tukwila Planning & Bldg. Department 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 DL-3