HomeMy WebLinkAboutD_HEX_Sunset_Master_Plan_1412151
2
3
4
BEFORE THE H ARING EXAMINER FOR THE CITY OF RENTON
5
6 RE: Sunset Master Site lan
ORDER GRANTING CONTINUANCE
7
LUA14-0014758
9
10
11
WHEREAS, a public hearing on the above-captioned master site plan application was
scheduled before the Renton Hearing Examiner for December 16, 2014, and
12
WHEREAS, staff have of been able to prepare'a staff report due to an extraordinary amount
13 of hearings scheduled for the ear's end, and
14 WHEREAS, it is the understanding of the Examiner that the applicant has beena advised of
15 the continued hearing date and that the proposal has not generated much public interest such that it
is not anticipated that anyon from the public will appear on the day of the scheduled hearing,
16 NOW, THEREFORE
17 ORDER
18
The public hearing scheduled f r the above captioned matter on December 16, 2014 is continued to
19 10:00 am on Decembe201I in the Renton City Council Meeting Chambers, 7th Floor City Hall,
20
1055 South Grady Way, Rento WA 98057.
21 DATED this 1 th day of December, 2014.
22
PIM A.f>lbrechts
23 I
City of Renton Hearing Examiner
24
25
26
ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE- 1
Denis
ma oraW I C.1 Of :
L
II l •
J.J1
City Clerk Jason A.Seth,CMC
January 15,2015
Mark Gropper
Renton Housing Authority
P.O.'Box 2316 - * '
Renton, WA 98056
Subject: Notice of Hea ing Examiner Decision
Renton Sunse Terrace Redevelopment Master Site.Plan
LUA-14-0014 5, SA-M, CUP
V Dear Mr. Gropper:
The City of Renton's Hearing.Examiner has issued a decision on the Renton Sunset
Terrace Redevelopment Mater Site Plan Conditional Use Permit dated January 14,
2015.
The Hearing Examiner Decision is immediately available:
Electronically on line t the City,of Renton website (www.rentonwa.gov);
To be viewed at the•City Clerk's office on the 7th floor or Renton City Hall, 1055
South Grady Way, between 8 am -and 4 pm. Ask for the project file by the V
V
project number LUA14-001475; and V
For purchase at a copl ing charge of$0.15 per page. The estimated cost for the
Hearing Examiner Decision is $3.15, plus a.handling and postage cost (this cost
is subject to change if documents are added):
APPEAL DEADLINE: RMC 4-8-080 provides that the final decision of •the Hearing
Examiner is subject to appeal,to the Renton City Council. RMC 4-8-110(E)(14) requires
appeals of the Hearing Examiner's decision to be filed-within fourteen (14)calendar days
from the date of the _hearing examiner's decision. ,Appeals must be filed in writing
together with the required fele to the'City Council, City of Renton, .1055 South Grady
Way, Renton, WA 98057. Additional information regarding'the appeal process may be
obtained from the City-Clerk's Office, Renton City Hall - 7th Floor, (425) 430-6510.
1055 South Grady Way•Renton,Washington 98057• (425)430-6510/Fax(425)430-6516•rentonwa.gov
RECONSIDERATION:'A request for reconsideration to the.Hearing Examiner may-also be
filed within this 14.day appeal period as identified in RMC.4-8-110(E)(13) and RMC 4-8-I,
T00(G)(9). Reconsiderations must-be filed in writing to the Hearing Examiner, City of -
Renton,.1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057: Additional Information regarding
the'reconsideration process may be obtained from the City Clerk's Office,-.Renton City :.
Hall- 7th-Floor, (425) 430-6510. A new fourteen (14) day appeal period shall commence'
upon the issuance ofa reconsideration decision:
Please contact Jason Seth,City Clerk`for help viewing or payment for the Hearing
Examiner's.decision: He can be reached at (425)430-6510.orjseth@)rentonwa.gov: .
Thank you.
Sincere
Chris L. Chau
Deputy City Clerk
cc: Hearing Examiner
Rocale Timmons,Senior Planner
Jennifer Henning, Planning Director
Vanessa`Dolbee,Current Planning Manager
Steve Lee, Development,Engineering Manager
Craig Burnell,Building Official
Sabrina Mirante,Secretary,Planning Division
Ed Prince,City Councilmember
Julia:Medzegian,City Council.Liaison '
Parties of Record(11)
1
January 15, 2015
CERTIFICATE OF MAILING
STATE OF WASHINGTON
COUNTY OF KING
CHRIS L. CHAU, City Clerk for the City of Renton, being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and
says that he is a citizen of the United States and a resident of the State of Washington, over the
age of 21 and not a party to nor interested in this matter.
That on the 15th day of Januar , 2015, at the hour of 4:30 p..m. your affiant duly mailed and
placed in the United States Post Office at Renton, King County, Washington, by first class mail
the Hearing Examiner's Final Decision re: Renton Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Master Site
Plan (LUA-14-001475, SA-M, CUP)to the attached parties of record.
J
Chris L. Chau, Deputy City Clerk
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE me this 15th day of January, 2015.
ONT1//4 iiii
9 c\ 0!
CP 00 7:1% -‘7,4i
Mora \, r. >% .o ma
i.
Notary Public ikand for the State of tic y
Washington, residing in Renton 4/*/•,''u,,, •,0 a
My Commission expires: 8/27/2018 iii '4SHING •z.—
Jon Troxelaron Barker an8ornus
PO Box 397 f5718 SE 143rd St 932G|ennwood Ave NE,#7
Shaw Island,VVA98ZAG 6ton.VVA98059 Renton,VVAQAOSG
Sunset Terrace Development LLC Yong Z
3256 38thP|E Renton Housing Authority 27126SE18thP|
Bellevue,VVA9DllZ 2316 Sammamish'VKA9OO7S
Renton,VWA98OSG
8everIV MeVs harlesLoveiov
11DOHaningtorf Ave NE,#ZO9 Harrington Place HOA 1D83 Harrington Ave NE
Renton,VVA9DOS6 7116 W Meeker10 Renton,WA 98056
ilk
oe|Dean Chip Vincent GarvVVa|ter
11OO Harrington Ave NE,#1OS ' it' Rent 1100 Harhn8ton/N#1O4it'
Renton,VVA98OS6 115 S 4yVVay Renton,VVA9OOS6
UndaPenine
3O6 Seneca Ave NVV
Renton,VVA980S7
asod a aje maLwm asn
1 @00L5O y 0 u1'- - puao e3x^ N n ~
ounset Master Site Plan
LUA14-001475
PARTIES OF RECORD
7,.4 Y3h f fir.:. r - ... Fes"' r.;,ax °u ,.1 as xf N'x t:3'..
PP!an v A. ;#,-.: .
r.
Dwner d r,.. o- 4 'f --" 'caner
r
4 r st
City of Renton Subset Terrace Development LLC Mark Gropper
1055 S Grady Way 22156 38th PI E Renton Housing,Authority
Be'levue,WA 98112 PO Box 2316
206)322-1381 Renton,WA 98056
v ^ Sb r ,r ii.
Jon Troxel Sharon Barker Bryan Barrus
PO Box 397 15718 SE 143rd St 922 Glennwood Ave NE,#7
Shaw Island,WA 98286 Renton,WA 98059 Renton,WA 98056
360)317-7003
y,,
1
F
RecoM ?
s :f Ag'w, a'
Yong Zhong Beverly Meyer Harrington Place HOA
27126 SE 18th PI 1100 Harrington Ave NE,#209 716 W Meeker St,#101
Sammamish,WA 98075 Renton,WA 98056 Kent,WA 98032
253)852-3000
Ar;w"k 1"yE"a' 'c'# s
F -, `
x" 2 c, ^. c
a of Record
p,sf..
Charles Lovejoy Joe Dean Gary Walter
1083 Harrington Ave NE 11 0 Harrington Ave NE,#105 1100 Harrington Ave NE,#104
Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056
Partyof.Record w sr i
A.,ref ?s,n"3":ni.:t
Linda Perrine
306.Seneca Ave NW
Renton,WA 98057
Page 1 of 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8 BEFORE THE HE• RING EXAMINER FOR THE CITY OF RENTON
9
RE: Renton Sunset Ter ace
10
Redevelopment Ma ter Site Plan )
FINAL DECISION
11
Site Plan, Conditio al Use Permit )
12
LUA14-001475, SA M, CUP
13
14
15 SUMMARY
16 The City has requested Master ite Plan review and a Conditional Use Permit to modify the Sunset
17 Terrace Redevelopment Area b adding 90 additional residential `units, increasing the height'limit
and lot coverage requirements d reducing setbacks. The City has also requested a change in the
18 vesting timeline. The Master Site Plan Review and Conditional Use Permit are approved with
conditions. The, 10 year expirati n request is granted.
19
20 TESTIMONY
21 Rocale Timmons, senior plann r, described the history of the project and the progress to date. She
described the site characteristics and the revisions being requested for this process. Ms. Timmons
22 stated since 2011, there have been some entitlements of land uses. The City and its partners have
23 reevaluated the original Master Site Plan since the 2011 approvals of the Planned Action Ordinance
and'issuance of the FEIS. The p eferred alternative was Alternative 3 from the FEIS. The City and its
24 partners are requesting several dhanges to the preferred alternative including the addition of 90 more
residential units, increased building heights, reduced setbacks, increased lot coverages and
25 reclassification of local streets. In return, the City will be able to expand the proposed public park to
26
3.2 acres.
SITE PLAN, CRITICAL AREAS EXEMPTION, STREET
MODIFICATION, AND LOT L E ADJUSTMENT- 1
1
1 The City is requesting Master Site Plan review at this stage to allow for the proposed changes. This is
not site plan review for individual project components; that will come later. This decision is
2 -conceptual only in nature. As proposed and conditioned, all zoning, development standards and
3 design standards will be met The decision today covers only lot coverage, residential density,
building height and an increased timeline for vesting. The hope is to streamline the process going
4 forward and to reflect the revised design. Approval of the Master Site Plan and Conditional Use
Permit will facilitate phased si a planning over time and provide more certainty to the development
5 partners. The CUP.approval is for the height increase. The City would like this project to have a 10
6 year vesting timeline.
7 All environmental review has een accomplished as either part of the initial FEIS for the original
Master Site Plan are as amend d for the revised Master Site Plan. No new or different impacts are
8 anticipated from the proposed anges. Demolition and Disposition Permits for all public housing has
9 already been approved by HU I. All affected families in public housing have already received either
vouchers or relocation assist. ce. No public comments were received regarding the proposed
io revisions to the approved Mast-r Site Plan.
11 The additional units will pay i pact fees and development charges based on school district and City
12
requirements. The project in'ludes installation of a regional stormwater system, though each
individual development will pr i vide for its own stormwater.
13
Public Testimony
14
Larry Joel Dean of 1100 Harrington Avenue NE lives in the redevelopment master plan area. He
15 spoke generally in favor of the roject, but had several items of concern. He understands this is a long
16 term project with many phases, but has been living in an active construction zone for a long time. He
is looking forward to the compl tion of the project.
17
Mr. Dean is president of the ho eowners association for Olympic Condos, which represents 29 units
18 in the center of the master pl . He stated his residents feel ignored by the City and communication
19 has been inadequate. Specifically, Mr. Dean related the story of the road construction work that
occurred over the Christmas break. The contractor failed to place a steel plate over the driveway to
20 the condos. As a result, a resident got their car stuck in the gap and had to have the vehicle towed.
The contractor eventually ret ed from the break and placed the steel plate in place, but only after
21 the damage was done.
22
Mr. Dean stated he was cone rned about the reduced setbacks along SR 900 and the increased
23 building height. He currently live es next to a vacant lot that is slated to become a six story building. He
reiterated he is generally very supportive of the project, but is concerned about communication with
24 and from the City.
25
26
SITE PLAN, CRITICAL AREAS EXEMPTION, STREET
MODIFICATION,AND LOT IIINEADJUSTMENT- 2
d}
r
1 Staff Rebuttal
1
2
Rocale Timmons apologized for the incident with the steel plate. She explained the project timeline,
3 which is in excess of ten year
I.
She also stated the road improvements along Harrington Road will
likely last another six months. Ms. Timmons stated the City would support a condition of approval
4, that required notification in ado ition to what is currently required by City code, such as asking each '
individual phase to provide in'ormation to surrounding property owners about timelines and contact
5 information.'
6
EXHIBITS
7 -
8
The December 30, 2014 staff eport Exhibits 1-15 identified at page 2 of the staff report itself
9 were admitted,into the record it uring the hearing. The staff PowerPoint was admitted as Exhibit
16 during the hearing.
10 '
11 FINDINGS OF FACT
12
J
13 Procedural:
14 1. Applicant. The applic. is are the City of Renton, the Renton Housing Authority and the
Sunset Terrace Development, LC.
15
2. Hearing. The Examin-r held a hearing on the subject application on December 30, 2014 at16
10:00 am in the City of Renton Council Chambers.
17
3. Project Description. S set Terrace in northeast Renton is the oldest multifamily public
18 housing complex directly man Iged by the Renton Housing Authority. It was constructed in 1959 and
19
contains 110 dwelling units it 27 buildings. The City of Renton, along with the Renton Housing
Authority(RHA), the King County Library System, Colipitts Development, and community partners,
20 is redeveloping approximately 15.28-acres of Sunset Terrace within the larger Sunset Area
21 Community Neighborhood.
22 The Sunset Terrace public housing community is generally bounded by Sunset Lane NE and
Glenwood Avenue NE on the north, NE 10th Street on the east, NE Sunset Boulevard (State Route
23 [
SR] 900) on the south, and Edmonds Avenue NE on the west. RHA owns additional vacant and
24 residential land along Edmonds Avenue NE, Glenwood Avenue NE, Harrington Ave NE, Kirkland
25
Ave NE, and Sunset Lane NE, ind the Authority plans to incorporate these additional properties into
the Sunset Terrace redevelopment for housing and associated services.
26
SITE PLAN, CRITICAL ARE S EXEMPTION, STREET
MODIFICATION, AND LOT NE ADJUSTMENT- 3
1 Redevelopment of this area envisions Sunset Terrace as a mixed-use, mixed-income community
2 anchored by a new public library and a new park. Mixed-use sites will have both market rate and
affordable rental housing in multi-story, multi-family townhomes and apartments, along with
3 commercial and retail space. P oposed residential land includes apartments and attached townhomes
4 that are generally between two d four stories in height, extending to five and six stories along SR -
900, which will provide 722 total dwelling units. Proposed commercial space would equal between
5 19,500-59,000sf, with 15,000sf consisting of a newly relocated Renton Highlands Library (this use
6 has.already been permitted and is under construction), and the rest consisting of retail or office space
depending on market needs.
7
The NEPA/SEPA Final EnviroTnental Impact Statement (FEIS) was issued on April 1, 2011. The
8
City completed a Record of De a ision (ROD) in accordance with the National Environmental Policy
9 Act (NEPA)to redevelop the 15,28 acre Sunset Terrace public housing community(May 2011) into a
mixed use, mixed density, mixed income community anchored by a new public park and library. The10 .
City also completed Planned Action Ordinance (#5610) in accordance with the State Environmental
11 Policy Act (SEPA). Since the lloriginal FEIS analysis, redevelopment efforts have continued and
12 additional site planning has occurred. As a consequence, the applicants are now proposing changes to
the number and configuration of'units.
13
The revised development propo al will add 90 more units to the Sunset Terrace area, though the
14 neighborhood total will remain he same. Also, the City has reconfigured the proposed public park
15 and expanded it to 3.2 acres. T s required a reduction in the footprint of the adjacent buildings and
commensurate increases in building heights and density at these locations. To do this, the City must
16 increase the lot coverage and bu4ding heights within the Sunset Terrace area and reduce the required
17 street setbacks. The original FEIS Preferred Alternative (#3), Record of Decision and Planned Action
Ordinance contemplated 90 fewer units, larger setbacks from SR 900, shorter buildings and different
18 street profiles.
19
To accomplish these changes, a PA Reevaluation, pursuant to Section 58.47 of US Department of
20 Housing and Urban Development's (HUD's)NEPA regulations, is required. The NEPA Reevaluation
21 must demonstrate the original conclusions of the FEIS remain valid. SEPA also provides a process,
using an Addendum to the prior FEIS where new information or analysis does not, substantially
22 change prior conclusions about impacts (WAC 197-11-706). A Reevaluation, consistent with
23 .
applicable National Environmen al Policy Act (NEPA) regulations and a SEPA addendum, was
prepared to evaluate the proposed changes to the Master Site Plan. The Reevaluation and Addendum
24 (December 8, 2014) concluded there are no new or different impacts resulting from the change and
25
the conclusions of the FEIS are still valid.
26
SITE PLAN, CRITICAL AREAS EXEMPTION, STREET
MODIFICATION, AND LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT- 4
1 To accommodate the localized change in density, the City has requested Master Site Plan review. The
2 City has requested a Conditional Use Permit to increase the height limit and lot coverage
requirements and reduce setb4ks in the areas proposed for additional units. The City has also
3 requested an extension of the vesting timeline to 10 years.
4 In total, there will be 722 dwelling units (including the 90 additional units requested under the present
5 proposal). Twenty six of the u 'ts have already been constructed by the Renton Housing Authority
RHA). The 90 additional units will be spread across Master Plan Sites C, D, E, F, G, H,I and J.
6
Site C: The RHA Edmonds Apartments site is approximately 1.7 acres within the Center Village7 (
CV) zone. Proposed for the site is a four-story multi-family building, over one-story of structured
8 parking, containing-no more thin 112 apartment units. The proposed building height is 50 feet and
9 would orient towards Edmonds Avenue NE, with a direct sidewalk connection. The original proposal
had contemplated 99 units for this site.
10
Site D: The RHA Sunset Terra e Apartments site is approximately 0.51 acres within the CV Zone.
11 Proposed for the site is a five-st ry multi-family building containing no more than 54 apartment units.
12 The FEIS Preferred Alternative had contemplated 41 units on this site. Units may be redistributed
among Sites D and G provided the NEPA Reevaluation conclusions are maintained (Staff Report
13 Exhibit 2). The proposed buildin height is 60 feet and would orient towards Sunset Lane NE, with a
14 direct sidewalk connection. Parking is anticipated to be under building.
15 Site E: The RHA Sunset Park West Townhomes site is approximately 0.55 acres and is zoned
Residential-14. The proposeddevelopment consists of two, three-story, multi-family residential
16
buildings with associated garage parking. These buildings contain eight apartment and ten townhome
17 dwelling units for a total of 18 ur I'ts
1.
18, Site F: The RHA Sunset Court 'fownhomes site is approximately 0.88 acres and is zoned CV. The
19 proposed development consists of two, two-story, multi-family residential buildings with associated
surface parking. These buildings ontain ten townhome dwelling units. The proposed building height
20 is 30 feet2.
21 -
22 1 The Staff Report Findings No. 6 lists this site as having a total of 10 units in the approved'and revised site plans.
The language above is from Staff-Report Finding No. 10. The chart on page 4 of the Staff Report limits the total
23 units to 722. This decision is for a conceptual site plan limited to a total of 722 units to be constructed in several
phases and in several different buildings and locations. If the City wishes to increase the total number of units to
24 account for the discrepancy between the Staff Report Findings for Site E, they are encouraged to request a
reconsideration.
25 2 There is also a discrepancy between the Staff Report Finding Nos: 6 and 11 with respect to the total number of
units proposed for this site. As noted above, this decision limits the total number of units in the Master Site Plan to
26 722.
SITE PLAN, CRITICAL AREAS EXEMPTION, STREET
MODIFICATION, AND LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT- 5
1 Site G: The RHA Sunset Park Townhomes East (Piha) site is approximately 1.09 acres in size and
2 zoned CV. The proposed development consists of three multi-story, multi-family residential buildings
with a below grade parking structure. Future plans include 3 buildings containing a total of 57 multi-
3 family units with a mix of 1, 2, and 3-bedroom units. Units may be redistributed among Sites D and
4 G provided the NEPA Revaluation conclusions are maintained (Exhibit 2). The buildings range in
height from two to four stories, and the overall proposed building height is 48 feet. Proposed off-site -
5 improvements include a new si ewalk along Sunset Lane NE. The FEIS considered 56 units for this
6 site.
7 Site H: The Colpitts Sunset Te ace Development Building A site is approximately 0.99 acres and is
located within the CV zone. A ix-story, 68-foot tall, mixed-use building with associated structured
8
parking is proposed for the site. The building would contain a total of 117 residential units (up from
9 111 units in the original proposal) and about 19,500sf of commercial space including a 15,000sf King
County Library facility (LUA1 3 001720). Units between sites H, I, and J may be redistributed at the10
time of Site Plan Review.
11
Site I: The Colpitts Sunset Terr ce Development Building B site is approximately 1.18 acres and is
12 located within the CV Zone. A ix-story, 62-foot tall, multi-family project with associated structured
13 parking is proposed for the site. he building would contain a total of 196 residential units. The FEIS
had considered 188 units for this site. Units between sites H, I, and J may be redistributed at the time
14 of Site Plan Review. Vehicular a cess to structured parking on the site would be provided,at multiple
15 points along Sunset Lane NE. P destrian access to a residential lobby would also occur from Sunset
Lane NE.
16
Site J: The Colpitts Sunset Terr ce Development Building C site is approximately 0.74 acres and is
17 located within the CV zone. A ve-story multi-family project with associated structured parking is
18 proposed for the site. The building would contain a total of approximately 110 residential units (up
from 104 units). Units between sites H, I, and J may be redistributed at the,time of Site Plan Review.
19
20 Mixed-use sites will have both mIarket rate and affordable rental housing in multi-story, multi-family
townhomes and apartments, alon with commercial,and retail space. Defining features of the site plan
21 include:
22 An expanded Sunset Neighborhood Park centrally located within the site.
23
A circular local road system that facilitates circulation around the park,.connecting Sunset
24 Lane,NE 10th, and the southern end of Glenwood Avenue NE.
25 Compatibility with future multimodal SR 900 improvements.
26
SITE PLAN, CRITICAL AREAS EXEMPTION, STREET
MODIFICATION, AND LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT- 6
I i
1 Mixed-use development with residential and commercial uses including retail space and a
2 library.
3 A Library situated at the corner of NE 10th and Sunset Blvd NE across from the proposed
expanded park(LUA 13-001720).
4
5
The site is located within Zone 2 of the Aquifer protection Area: There are no other critical areas
located on site.
6
The property is zoned Center Village (CV) and Residential-14 (R-14). The Comprehensive Plan
7 designation is Center Village. To the north is multi-family residential (R-14 and CV zones). To the
8 east are multi-family residenial and commercial uses (CV zone). To the south is Sunset
Boulevard/SR 900. To the w st is multi-family residential (R-10 and CV zone). The proposal
9 involves multi-family, commer ial, institutional and public uses.
10 4. Adequacy of Infrastru ture/Public Services. The project will be served by adequate
11 infrastructure and public servic
I as follows:
12 A. Water and Sewer Se ice. The site is served by the City of Renton for all water and sewer
13 service. The proposa ,is a conceptual Master Site Plan for a multi-phase development over
a large subarea. This topic will be reviewed with detailed Site Plan Review for each phase.
14 A conceptual water n ain improvements layout for the proposed developments identified
15
has been developed (Staff Report Exhibit 13). The diagram updates the information
contained in the Fin 1 EIS as amended in the NEPA/SEPA Reevaluation/Addendum, but
16 is intended to meet City standards as described in the Final EIS.
17
The City will require 12-inch water mains in all new public streets (Harrington Ave NE,
18 ' Sunset Lane NE, NE 10th Street, Glennwood Ave NE) to provide the estimated fire flow
19 demand ranging from 3,000 gpm to 4,000 gpm based on the City Fire Prevention's review
of various pre-application submittals.A developer's extension of the section of 12-inch
20 water main in Suns4 Blvd NE/SR 900 will be required to be a looped water system
21 because the estimated fire flow demand for the proposed development on Site H and on
Site I is above 2,500 gpm.
22
23 The location of the new water main in SR 900 west of Harrington will be evaluated as part
of the pre-design/design of the roadway improvements projects, and consider the need to
24
accommodate existing and future public and private utilities, rockery/retaining walls,
25 street trees, etc.
26
SITE PLAN, CRITICAL AREAS EXEMPTION, STREET
MODIFICATION, AND LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT-7
1
1 Sites plans will be required to show the location of the existing sewer system in order to
2 determine the potential re-use of existing sewer (conditioned on lining the existing sewer
mains and manholes) provided the location does not interfere with the ultimate
3 roadway/building ali nments.
4
Where a sewer mail} exists in the current Harrington Ave NE alignment that will become
5 the new park it will be retained; the City will eliminate manholes where needed and where
6 feasible. The park connection is likely to occur at NE 10th St, or at the west end, where
new private development may be able to shorten'the existing sewer to keep it within the
7 roadway. Where the section of Glenwood Avenue NE reconnects with Harrington Avenue
8 NE the sewer main will need to be rerouted.
9 Approved plans indicate the Library will connect to the existing sewer in NE 10th Street.
10
B. Fire and Police. Police and Fire Prevention staff indicated that sufficient resources exist to
11
furnish services to the proposed development; if the applicant provides Code required
12 improvements and fees. Impact fees will be discussed in detail as part of the Site Plan
Review for each phase and assessed at the time of building permit application.
13
14 C. Drainage. As with water and sewer, drainage issues related to the individual phases and
15 improvements will be evaluated at the time of each separate site plan approval. However,
the regional stormwater facility will be constructed in advance of the future park. The
16 estimated time for the stormwater facility completion is June 30, 2015. The regional
17
stormwater facility i Sunset Park will address flow control for Sunset Blvd NE/SR 900
roadway water quali treatment. The regional facility in the Park is designed for SR 900
18 and is not designed to receive any stormwater from the Master Plan area, and per the grant
19 funding,this site c of be used for mitigation.
20 D. Parks/Open Space. he proposed development will impact the Parks and Recreation
21' system. These impacts will be mitigated by payment of the Parks Impact Fee for each
multi-family unit. The Applicant is a new 3.2 acre park. Sunset Park has been increased in
22 size compared to pri or conceptual plans studied in the FEIS, April 2011. Proposed park
23 components include a performance space, a child-friendly water feature, play area, picnic
area, restroom buildi g, fitness equipment, walking loop, integration of art, passive open
24 space, plazas, and rain gardens.
25
Both the park and he regional storm water facility require maintenance access and
26 load/unload areas. The maintenance access and load/unload zone will be located on the
SITE PLAN, CRITICAL AREAS EXEMPTION, STREET
MODIFICATION,AND LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT- 8
1 north side of the fu re park along (extended) NE 10th St. An internal walkway system
2 will be incorporated into the park however a perimeter park sidewalk will not be included.
3 Common open spac will be provided by the individual developments and review as part
4 of the site plan rev ew process for each development. Common use spaces could have
views to the west to ards Lake Washington and the Olympic Mountains for all residents
5 in proposed 5-6 sto buildings. Private open space would most likely be provided through
6 private decks or sm 1 yards.
7 E. Transportation. Tra fic impacts are adequately mitigated by the proposal. Level of service
8 standards will not b= reduced below adopted levels for the proposal and traffic impact fees
will be assessed to p.y for proportionate share transportation system impacts.
9
10 A proposed loop ro J d along Sunset Lane NE will encircle the proposed park. Along the
library and mixed-use building space;.the lane could be specially paved and serve as. a
11
plaza for special e ents. The width of this roadway is 49 feet. Each phase will be
12 responsible for thei proportionate share of frontage improvements (RMC 4-6-060). The
City is considering a SAD/LID for the improvement of the Sunset Lane NE loop13
depending on the t. ing of funding and construction for each individual phase.
14
15 The Sunset Area "g een connections" would be implemented per the Sunset Area Surface
Water Master Plan. One of these facilities is currently under construction on Harrington
16 Avenue NE. The Ci is considering street reclassifications and two new street sections for
17 roads that have 60-foot rights of way presently (Staff Report Exhibit 12): Green Collector
and Neighborhood ollector. The 60 foot right of way is consistent with the "Green
18, Connections" cross ection in the Sunset Area Surface Water Master Plan (Staff Report
19
Exhibit 14). Howev-r, the Green Connections can only be implemented in some locations
and therefore a 60 foot cross-section for a Neighborhood Collector is also proposed.
20
21 Traffic impact fees for the individual phases will be reviewed at the time of detailed Site
Plan Review for ech phase would be based on square footage of the building (not
22 including parking garage) and,the number of residential units. Fees will be assessed at the
23 time of building permit application.
24 The transportation analysis in the NEPA Reevaluation and SEPA Addendum indicated
25 relatively little difference between the revised Master Plan and previously reviewed
alternatives in terms Hof traffic (Staff Report Exhibit 2).
26
SITE PLAN, CRITICAL AREAS EXEMPTION, STREET
MODIFICATION, AND LOT E ADJUSTMENT- 9
1
1 F. Schools. The assessment of School Impacts and fees will occur during the individual site
2 plan review phase of each proposed improvement. The project will replace some existing
public housing units. School impact fees will be assessed only on net new units.
3
4 G. Parking. Compliance with parking standards will be reviewed during specific Site Plan
Reviews for each hase. In general,.the majority of parking spaces for the residential
5 components will be accommodated primarily in below grade and partially below grade
6 parking levels. Mo t of the proposed parking counts for individual sites are within the
allowable range determined by RMC 4-4-080, except for Site 9/10, which needs an
7 additional 6 parkin spaces to meet the required minimum number of parking spaces..
8 However, because t e other sites propose parking spaces well over the required minimum
number, there coul be adequate parking for the Master Site Plan-as a whole. A Joint
9 Parking Agreement could be developed prior to future site plan approval addressing any
10 shared parking arr gements, provided parking is within 750 feet of the intended site
11
RMC 4-4-080(E)(3 ).
12 H. Bicycle Stalls. Required bicycle parking will be addressed during site plan review for the
individual phases.
13
14 I. Vehicular Access and Internal Circulation. The Master Plan proposes a loop road system
15
that creates a mor logical and seamless road pattern than exists today. Pedestrian
connections from the street to the buildings will be provided. A complete streets vision
16 has been proposed Ior the area and would serve to guide improvements to streets within
17 the area. A condition of approval will require all phases included in the Master Site Plan
to comply with the unset Area Street Classification Map (Staff Report Exhibit 12).
18
19
J. Pedestrian Circulati n. A pedestrian circulation system is proposed throughout the project
site which connects all opens space and parking areas spaces. Pedestrian circulation will
20 be addressed for ea improvement phase at the time of individual site plan approval.
21
K. Landscaping. Landscaping in public spaces and on building sites will- be employed to
22 provide transitions between developments and enhance the overall subarea and individual
23 projects' appearance. This topic will be more specifically reviewed during Site Plan
Review for each phase.
24
25 L. Refuse Enclosure. Compliance with refuse and recycle standards will be reviewed during
specific Site Plan Reviews for each phase.
26
SITE PLAN, CRITICAL ARE S EXEMPTION, STREET
MODIFICATION,AND LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT- 10
1 M. Building Facade Modulation. The individual proposals will include a variety of building
2 articulations and modulations in order to break down the scale and massing of the
structures.
3
4
5. Adverse Impacts. Th9 NEPA/SEPA"Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) was
issued on April 1, 2011. The City completed a Record of Decision (ROD) in accordance with the
5 .National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) in May 2011. The City also completed Planned Action
Ordinance (#5610) in accordan e with the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). The changes to
6 the development proposal to dd more units and height and to address street standards require a
NEPA Reevaluation, pursuani to Section 58.47 of US Department of Housing and Urban
7 Development's (HUD's) NEPA regulations, demonstrating that,the original conclusions of the FEIS
8 remain valid. 'SEPA also provides a process, using an Addendum to the prior FEIS rwhere new
information or analysis does nd't substantially_change prior conclusions about impacts (WAC 197-11-
9 706). A Reevaluation, consis'Itent with applicable National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
regulations and a SEPA addendum, was prepared to evaluate the proposed changes to the Master Site
10 Plan. The Reevaluation and Addendum (December 8, 2014) concluded there are no new or different
11 impacts resulting from the change and the conclusions of the FEIS are still valid.
12 Beyond those impacts contemplated in the FEIS, ROD, Planned Action Ordinance and NEPA
Reevaluation and SEPA Addendum, there are no additional significant adverse impacts associated
13 with the project. Few adverse impacts related to the Master Site Plan revision are anticipated.
14 Adequate infrastructure serves the site as determined in Finding of Fact No. 4. There are no critical
areas on site. Impacts are more pecifically addressed as follows:
15
A. Increased Density. Many sites in the Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Area propose higher
16 densities above the maximum density currently allowed in their associated zone. Viewed
17 in context of the overall Sunset Terrace Site, which since 2011 has been planned
comprehensively as a coordinated mixed use redevelopment project with park amenities,
18 the density would e$ual about 65 dwelling units per acre (du/acre), less than the 80 du/acre
maximum allowed in the Center Village zone.
19
Site D is proposed or 1-06.8 du/acre, well above the maximum density allowed in the CV
20
zone. Colpitts Buildings A (118.2 du/acre), B (166.0 du/acre), and C (148.3 due/acre) are
21 each proposed to exceed the 80 du/acre determined by the size of their individual sites.
22 Staff suggest given the Public Park will not be developed with residential units there are
opportunities to transfer underutilized density from the park to the proposed Colpitts
23 Buildings A, B, ands C. The City has determined.a density transfer agreement would be the
24 most appropriate mechanism to transfer the ,unused density from the park to the
redevelopment sites.
25
City Staff have been working with Colpitts in order to develop a methodology and
26 framework for the'needed density transfer including the cost per additional unit and how
SITE PLAN, CRITICAL AREAS EXEMPTION, STREET
MODIFICATION, AND LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT- 11
1 the funds,obtained will be allocated. A condition of approval will require the City and
Colpitts to execute a Development/Density Transfer Agreement prior to detailed Site Plan2Reviewapprovalfoi'any phase of development-which intends to utilize unused residential
3 density from the proposed park acreage.
4 The RHA Sunset T Trace Apartments/Site D would also exceed the density determined by
the size of its antic' ated lot acreage. However, RHA Sunset Terrace Apartments would
5 be likely be utilizi g unused density from other RHA owned properties (Sunset Court
6 Park, Sunset Park E st PIHA). Therefore a density transfer agreement is not needed in this
case.
7
B. Increased Height. he Master Site Plan would introduce building heights of 5-6 stories
8 along Sunset Blvd E and along the south portion of the Sunset Lane NE loop, which
9 would exceed the c rrent maximum height allowed by zoning (Staff Report Exhibit 15).
According to the St ff Report, the requested building height limits are consistent with the
10 Sunset Terrace Red velopment Plan. As proposed, Colpitts Buildings A, B, C (Sites H, I,
J) and the Sunset _errace Apartments (Site D) are inconsistent with maximum height
11 limits of the CV zone, provided only residential uses are proposed. Site D would have
12
heights greater that existing development to the west. The height variance under the
conditional use per it was requested in order to allow for a larger Sunset Park while still
13 creating viable deve opments. There is capacity to add commercial uses in the Master Plan
should future applic is so choose. Should the proposals be revised to include commercial
14 uses in some cases o height modification would be needed.
15 The proposed park space would provide a substantial amenity to area residents and reduce
16 the overall visual i pression of height and bulk from viewers located further northward of
the loop road. For ark users, who would be closer to the proposed buildings, increased
17 height could create perception for park users of being surrounded by buildings looming
over them, dependiig on design treatments. Also, there would be increased height and
18 bulk from the perspective of pedestrians on Sunset Blvd NE. Thus small adjustments to
19 reduce height and bulk related to the increased height and intensity of the structures would
reduce impacts. Current city design standards address building modulation and roofline
20 variation and are recommended for application in the NEPA Reevaluation/SEPA
Addendum(Exhibit 2).
21
22
Increased height at the southern end of the Redevelopment Area would have the potential
to slightly increase the length of shadows cast on the interior park to the north. However,
23 reconfiguration of the park to increase its size as part of the updated Master Site Plan
process would ameliorate this to some degree, and the application of design standards
24 would further reduce shading impacts from increased building heights.
25 The "rim" of the Sunset Terrace Redevelopment area is particularly well suited to the
26 greater density/height proposed as it is immediately adjacent to Sunset Blvd NE, a major
SITE PLAN, CRITICAL AREAS EXEMPTION, STREET
MODIFICATION,AND LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT- 12
1 arterial and state hi i way capable of accommodating the traffic generated by the proposed
project.
2
3 The proposed development would be among the taller developments in the vicinity until
such time as other properties will be redeveloped to meet the more intensive vision of the
4 CV zone. The proposed project is compatible with the scale and character of the existing
and planned neighb rhood. When the proposed height is considered in the context of the
5 entire redevelopme t plan area, the average height proposed for development is well
6 below 60-feet3. The additional height allows for the achievement of the proposed units and
reflects the greater ize of the park and redistribution of units to maximize the park site.
7 Sunset Terrace has een identified as an area where it is desirable to develop residential
uses to a density greater than currently exists, which requires either less public open space
8 or higher buildings.
9
Compliance with e height standards for all other structures•will be reviewed during
10 specific Site Plan R views for each phase.
11 C. Increased Lot Co erage. As with the increased density and height, the proposal
collectively meets tie lot coverage requirements. However, Sites D, H/K, I and J exceed
12
the standard individually. If these lots are aggregated with the increased park acreage, lot
13 coverage requirements are met. Staff notes this is consistent with the overall Master Plan
approach. The rem fining lots all appear to be able to meet lot coverage requirements
14 through the use of structured parking, a topic which will be reassessed during individual
site plan review as each phase progresses.
15
16 D. Reduced Setbacks. The 2011 SR 900 Conceptual Plan was designed to account for
reduced setbacks al ng Sunset Lane NE. The plan assumes no front yard setbacks in this
17 location. Lot depth are 125 feet east of Harrington Avenue NE consistent with the VEER
site plan for Lots 9(10, and 130 feet west of Harrington Avenue NE. In all areas besides
18
along the redesigned Sunset Lane NE (SR 900), lot depths are sufficient to allow for
19 sufficient depths ofibuildings with underbuilding parking and account for odd geometries.
This being said,there should be room for a small setback from Sunset Lane NE.
20
Compliance with setback standards will be reviewed during specific Site Plan Reviews for
21 all other properties.
22
E. Privacy and Noise. Noise impacts are adequately mitigated. Staff anticipates most of the
23 noise impacts would occur during the construction phase of the project. The Master Site
Plan includes an arrangement of buildings around the Sunset Park to reduce noise.
24
25,
3 The maximum height allowable without a hearing examiner approved conditional use permit is 50 feet(RMC 4-2-
26 120(C)(16)).
SITE PLAN, CRITICAL AREAS EXEMPTION, STREET
MODIFICATION, AND LOT! INE ADJUSTMENT- 13
1 Conclusions of Law
2
3
1. Authority. Master Sit Plan Approvals for the overall plan and Conditional Use Permit
approvals are.each Type III d4isions determined by the hearing examiner (RMC 4-8-080(G)). The
4 aforementioned permits have been consolidated. RMC 4-8-080(C)(2)requires consolidated permits to
5
each be processed under"the highest-number procedure." As Type III applications, RMC 4-8-080(G)
grants the Examiner with the a thority to hold a hearing and issue a final decision on them, subject to
6 closed record appeal to the City Council.
7 2. Zoning/Comprehensive Plan Designations. The property is zoned Center Village (CV) and
8 Residential-14-(R-14). The Comprehensive Plan designation is Center Village.
9 3. Review Criteria. Master Site Plan Review is an optional process in the CV and R-14 zones
RMC 4-9-200(B)(1)). To ac9 onimodate the localized change in density, the City has requested
10 Master Site Plan review. The dity has requested a Conditional Use Permit to increase the height limit
11 and lot coverage requirements and reduce setbacks"in the areas proposed for additional units. The
12
City has also requested a change in the vesting timeline. Master Site Plan review standards are
governed by RMC-4-9-200(E)(3). Conditional Use Permits are governed by RMC 4-9-030. .All
13 applicable criteria are quoted below in italics and applied through corresponding conclusions of law.
14 Master Site Plan
15
RMC 4-9-200(E)(3): Criteri : The Administrator or designee must find a proposed project to be in
16 compliance with the following.•
17 a. Compliance and Consistency: Conformance with plans,policies, regulations and approvals,
including:
18
19 i. Comprehensive Van: The Comprehensive Plan,- its elements, goals, objectives, and
policies, especially those of the applicable land use designation;'the, Community Design
20 Element; and any applicable adopted Neighborhood Plan;
21 ii. Applicable land use regulations;
22
iii. Relevant Planned Action Ordinance and Development Agreements; and.
23
iv. Design Regulations: Intent and guidelines of the design regulations located in RMC 4-
24 3-100.
25
4. The proposal is consistent with applicable comprehensive plan policies, City of Renton zoning
26 regulations and design guidelines and the Sunset Planned Action area (Staff Report Exhibit 10) as
SITE PLAN, CRITICAL AREAS EXEMPTION, STREET
MODIFICATION, AND LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT- 14
1 outlined in Findings 20(a)-(1) of the staff report, which is adopted by this reference as if set forth in
full, including the findings and conclusions.
2
3 RMC 4-9-200(E)(3)(b): Off ite Impacts: Mitigation of impacts to surrounding properties and
uses, including:
4
5 i. Structures: Restri ting overscale structures and overconcentration of development on a
particular portion o the site;
6
ii. Circulation: Pr viding desirable transitions and linkages between uses, streets,
7 walkways and adjacent properties;
8
iii. Loading and Storage Areas: Locating, designing and screening storage areas,
9 utilities, rooftop equipment, loading areas, and refuse and recyclables to minimize views
from surrounding pr perties;
10
11
iv. Views: Recogn'zing the public benefit and desirability of maintaining visual
accessibility to attractive naturalfeatures,
12
v. Landscaping: Using landscaping to provide transitions between development and
13
surrounding properties to reduce noise and glare, maintain privacy, and generally
14 enhance the appear
II
nce of the project; and
15 vi. Lighting: Designing and/or placing exterior lighting and glazing in order to avoid
excessive brightness or glare to adjacent properties and streets.
16
17
5. The design as revised would mass more density in one portion of the subarea than in others
and increase the bulk of structures in that area. However, as determined in Finding of Fact No. 5,the
18 increased density and scale of the structures are appropriate along Sunset Boulevard NE because of
the heavy regional traffic in that area. The buildings will be modulated and designed to provide
19 relief to pedestrians walking near them. The most important offset, though, is the increased size of
20 the public park afforded by the proposed building massing and density. The design also allows for
improved vehicular circulation throughout the entire subarea by creating a new loop road. This
21 decision is a Master Plan Review and therefore is meant to be conceptual in nature. It represents a
decade long development of multiple phases of mixed use, mixed income development by public
22 and private entities. As such, issues related to internal circulation, loading and storage areas,
landscaping and lighting will be dealt with during the individual site plan review stages as each
23
phase progresses. There are presently no views of attractive natural features. As proposed, the
24 impacts to surrounding properties created by the revised design are mitigated.
25
26
SITE PLAN, CRITICAL AREAS EXEMPTION, STREET
MODIFICATION,AND LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT- 15
2 RMC 4-9-200(E)(3)(c): On Site Impacts:Mitigation of impacts to the site, including:
3 i. Structure Placement: Provisions for privacy and noise reduction by building placement, .
4 spacing and orientation;
5 ii. Structure Scale: Co Insideration of the scale of proposed structures in relation to natural
characteristics, views dnd vistas, site amenities, sunlight, prevailing winds, and pedestrian
6
and vehicle needs;
7
iii. Natural Features: Protection of the natural landscape by retaining existing vegetation
8 and soils, using topography to reduce undue cutting and filling, and limiting impervious
9
surfaces; and
10 iv. Landscaping: Use of landscaping to soften the appearance of parking areas, to provide
11
shade and privacy whl re needed, to define and enhance open spaces, and generally to
enhance the appearanc of the project. Landscaping also includes the design and protection
12 of planting areas so that they are less susceptible to damage from vehicles or pedestrian
movements.
13
6. As determined in Finding of Fact No. 5, the arrangement of buildings around Sunset Park will
14 block noise from SR 900. There is nothing in the record to reasonably suggest that the scale, spacing
15 and orientation of the project could be modified to provide for more privacy and noise reduction
without unreasonably interfering with the objectives of the facility or creating a detrimental impact
16 to the proposed park. The scale of the facility will not create any adverse impacts as discussed and is
compatible with vehicle an4 pedestrian circulation as determined in Finding of Fact No. 5. In
17 addition, there is nothing in the record to reasonably suggest that the scale of the project is
incompatible with sunlight, prevailing winds or natural characteristics. Impervious surfaces are
18 significantly less than those Iauthorized by applicable zoning regulations and are within the range
19 anticipated in the FEIS for the original Master Plan.
20 RMC 4-9-200(E)(3)(d): Access and Circulation: Safe and efficient access and circulation for all
21
users, including:
22 i. Location and Consolidation: Providing access points on side streets or frontage streets
rather than directly onto arterial streets and consolidation of ingress and egress points on the
23 site and, when feasible, with adjacent properties;
24
ii. Internal Circulation: Promoting safety and efficiency of the internal circulation system,
25 including the location, design and dimensions of vehicular and pedestrian access points,
drives,parking, turnarounds, walkways, bikeways, and emergency access ways;
26
SITE PLAN, CRITICAL AREAS EXEMPTION, STREET
MODIFICATION, AND LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT- 16
1
2 iii. Loading and Delivery: Separating loading and delivery areas from parking and
3 pedestrian areas;
4 iv. Transit and Bicycles:Providing transit, carpools and bicycle facilities and access; and
5 v. Pedestrians: Providing safe and attractive pedestrian connections between parking areas,
buildings,public sidewal ks and adjacent properties.
6
7 7. The proposal provides f r adequate access and circulation as required by the criterion above
for the reasons identified in Finding of Fact No. 4(I) and(J).
8
RMC 4-9-200(E)(3)(e): Open Space: Incorporating open spaces to serve as distinctive project
9 focal points and to provide adequate areas for passive and active recreation by the occupants/users
10 of the site.
11 8. The proposal provides for open space that serves as distinctive project focal points and also
provides for recreation as determined in Finding of Fact No. 4(N). A primary feature of the revised
12 proposal is an expanded public park which will serve as to visual and social focal point for the
13
neighborhood.
14 RMC 4-9-200(E)(3)(f): Vi ws and Public Access: When possible, providing view corridors to
shorelines and Mt. Rainier, a d incorporating public access to shorelines.
15
16 9. There are no view corri ors to shorelines or.Mt. Rainier affected by the proposal.
17 RMC 4-9-200(E)(3)(g): Natural Systems: Arranging project elements to protect existing natural
systems where applicable.
18
19
10. As noted in Finding of Fact No. 5,there are no critical areas on site. As determined in Finding
of Fact No. 4, the drainage system is designed to accommodate pedestrian friendly greenscape and
20 sidewalks while improving the existing regional stormwater quality.
21 RMC 4-9-200(E)(3)(h): Services and Infrastructure: Making available public services and
22 facilities to accommodate the proposed use.
23 11. The project is served by adequate services and facilities as determined in Finding of Fact No.
4.
24
25
RMC 4-9-200(E)(3)(i): ; Phasing: Including a detailed sequencing plan with development phases
and estimated time frames,for phased projects.
26
SITE PLAN, CRITICAL AREAS EXEMPTION, STREET
MODIFICATION, AND LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT- 17
1 1
r'
1
2 12. The Master Plan include. a detailed sequencing plan for development phases over a ten year
3 timeframe. Finding 20L of the Staff Report is adopted here by reference as if set forth in full.
4 Conditional Use
5 The Administrator or designee r the Hearing Examiner shall consider, as applicable, the following
6 factors for all applications:
7 RMC 4-9-030(C)(1): Consistency with Plans and Regulations: The proposed use shall be
compatible with the general goals, objectives, policies and standards of the Comprehensive Plan, the '
8 zoning regulations and any othr plans,programs, maps or ordinances of the City of Renton.
9
13. The Master Plan promotes a mixed use redevelopment with open space and civic amenities.
10 The Master Plan would advance the City's Center Village concept in the Comprehensive Plan and
zoning code. It would serve as incentive for other redevelopment opportunities near the study area.
1.1 Anticipated growth would help the City meet its 2031 housing and employment targets. It would also
serve to fulfill the Sunset Area Community Investment Strategy. The proposal is consistent with12
applicable comprehensive plan policies, City of Renton zoning regulations and design guidelines and
13 the Sunset Planned Action are (Staff Report Exhibit 10) as outlined in Findings 20(a)-(1) of the staff
report, which is adopted by this reference as if set forth in full, including the findings and
14 conclusions.
15 RMC 4-9-030(C)(2): Appr priate Location: The proposed location shall not result in the
16 detrimental overconcentration
I f a particular use within the City or within the immediate area of the
proposed use. The proposed to,ation shall be suitedforthe proposed use.
17
14. As described above in inding of Fact No. 5,the proposed location is suitable for the proposed
18
use. The overall Sunset Terra a Site has been planned comprehensively as a coordinated mixed use
19 redevelopment project with park amenities at an overall density that is less than the allowed
maximum in the CV zone while providing public amenities including affordable housing, a new
20 library and a public park. Given these factors the criterion,is met.
21 RMC 4-9-030(C)(3): Effect on Adjacent Properties: The proposed use at the proposed location
22 shall not result in substantial oilr undue adverse effects on adjacent property.
23 15. As determined in Finding of Fact No. 5 there are no.adverse impacts associated with the
24 proposal, so it will not result in substantial or undue adverse effects on adjacent property. The
proposed development would be among the taller developments in the vicinity,though it is essentially
25 the first coordinated development to implement the more intensive vision of the CV zone. The
proposed project is compatible with the scale and character of the existing and planned neighborhood.
26
SITE PLAN, CRITICAL AREAS EXEMPTION, STREET
MODIFICATION, AND LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT- 18
1
2 RMC 4-9-030(C)(4): Compatibility: The proposed use shall be compatible with the scale and
3
character of the neighborhood.
4
16. As determined in Finding of Fact No.'5, the proposed use is compatible, with the scale and
character of the neighborhood since it does not involve any significant adverse aesthetic impacts and
5 allows for the expansion of the proposed Sunset Park, creates a new loop road to improve access and
creates a gateway along SR 900.
6
7
RMC 4-9-030(C)(5): Parking:Adequate parking is, or will be made, available.
8 17. As noted in Finding of act No. 4, most parking is proposed to be in structures. Parking will
be reviewed during the phased build out at the time of each individual phase's site plan review. At
9 this stage,the overall project ap ears to provide adequate parking.
10
RMC 4-9-030(C)(6): Traffic: The use shall ensure safe movement for vehicles and pedestrians and
11 shall mitigate potential effects on the surrounding area.
12 18. As determined in Finding of Fact No. 4, the local-roadway network will be improved through
13 the redesigned Sunset Boulevard, the new loop road and the reconstructed Harrington Road. The
project will not have a significant impact on the general traffic in the vicinity and provides for
14 adequate and'safe pedestrian circulation. The criterion is met.
15
RMC 4-9-030(C)(7): Noise, Light and Glare: Potential noise, light and glare impacts from the
16 proposed use shall be evaluated and mitigated.
17 19. As determined in Find ng of Fact No. 5, noise and light impacts will be addressed during
18
individual site plan reviews for each implementing project. Lighting will comply with City
regulations which require ligh s to be directed inwards and prohibited light trespass. The building
19 design along Sunset Boulevard should shield park users from regional traffic noise from SR 900.
20 RMC 4-9-030(C)(8): Landscaping: Landscaping shall be provided in all areas not occupied by
21 buildings, paving, or critical areas. Additional landscaping may be required to buffer adjacent
properties from potentially adverse effects of the proposed use.
22
20. The criterion is met for the reasons discussed in Finding of Fact No. 4K under aesthetic
23
impacts.
24
25
26
SITE PLAN, CRITICAL AREAS EXEMPTION, STREET
MODIFICATION,AND LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT- 19
1 Time Limits
2 RMC 4-8-100(J):'Expiration of Large Scale or Phased Projects: For large scale or phased
3 development projects, the Examiner may at the time of approval or recommendation set forth time
limits for expiration which exceed those prescribed in this Section for such extended time limits as
4 p are justified by the record of the action.
5 21. . The applicants have requested an extended expiration timeline for the project because of its
6 scale and complexity. They hale also indicated much of the public infrastructure and development
is grant dependent.The applicants have requested a 10 year expiration limit. This request is granted.
7
8 DECISION
9
The Master Site Plan and Conditional Use Permit for the Renton Sunset Redevelopment Master Site
10 Plan, File No. LUA14-001475, SA-M, CU-P as depicted in Exhibit 3 of the Staff Report, are
approved subject to the followin conditions.
11
12 1. A Development/Density Transfer Agreement shall be executed by the City and Colpitts prior
to detailed Site Plan Revi w approval for any phase of development which intends to utilize
13 , unused residential densi from the proposed park acreage.
14 2. All phases included in a Master Site Plan shall.comply- with the Sunset Area Street
15
Classification Map, (Staff Report Exhibit 12). Conceptual frontage improvements shall be
submitted at the time of Site Plan Review for each phase and are subject to approval by the
16 Current Planning Project Manager and Plan Reviewer.
17 3. Prior to beginning construction, each individual project phase or improvement shall provide
18 information to surrounding property owners about timelines, extent of construction, and
contact information. .
19
4. This decision is effective until January 14,2025.
20
DATED this 14th day of January,2015.21
22
23
Emily Terr
24 City of Renton
Hearing Examiner Pro Tem
25
26
SUE PLAN, CRITICAL AREAS EXEMPTION, STREET
MODIFICATION,AND LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT-20
1
2
Appeal Right and Valuation Notices
3 RMC 4-8-080 provides that the final decision of the hearing examiner is subject to appeal to the
Renton City Council. RMC 4-8-110(E)(14) requires appeals of the hearing examiner's decision to
4 be filed within fourteen (14) calendar days from the date of the hearing examiner's decision. A
request for reconsideration to the hearing examiner may also be filed within this 14 day appeal
5 period as identified in RMC 4-8-110(E)(13) and RMC 4-8-100(G)(9). A new fourteen (14) day
6
appeal period shall commence upon the issuance of the reconsideration. Additional information
regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the City Clerk's Office, Renton City Hall—7th
7 floor, (425)430-6510. ,
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
r
21
22
23
24
25
26
SITE PLAN, CRITICAL AREAS EXEMPTION, STREET
MODIFICATION,AND LOT L E ADJUSTMENT- 21