HomeMy WebLinkAboutSR_HEX_Mission_Healthcare_121208DEPARTMENT OF COMr.. __ JITY
AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
A. REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER
HEARING DATE:
Project Name:
Owner/Applicant:
File Number:
Project Manager:
Project Summary:
Project Location:
Site Area:
December 8, 2015
Mission Healthcare at Renton
Careage Inc.; 4411 Point Fosdick Dr. NW #203; Gig Harbor, WA 98335
LUA15-000736, ECF, SA-H, CU-A
Rocale Timmons, Senior Planner
The applicant is requesting Hearing Examiner Site Plan Review, Conditional Use Permit,
and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the construction of a new 55,400 square foot,
three-story, convalescent center containing 60 beds to be used for short term
rehabilitation services. The subject property is located on the southeast corner of SE
174th St and 106th Place SE. The project work area totals 1.76 acres and is zoned
Commercial Arterial (CA). The site currently contains an espresso stand which is
proposed for removal. Access is proposed via 106th Pl SE with an additional connection
to the neighboring commercial property to the east. The proposal includes 56 surface
parking stalls to the south and east of the building. The proposed development is within
50 feet of a coal mine hazard. The applicant has submitted a Drainage Report, Traffic
Impact Analysis, Parking Analysis, Geotechnical Engineering study, and Coal Mine Hazard
Report with the subject application.
10635 SE 174th St
76,615 SF
Project Location Map
HEX Report
City of Renton Department of Com
MISSION HEALTHCARE AT RENTO
ity & Economic Development Hearing Examiner Recommendation
LUAlS-000736, ECF, SA-H, CU-A
Report of December 8, 2015 Page 4 of 30
9. The majority of the site is covered in grasses and brush. There are no significant trees on site.
10. The proposed development is within 50 feet of a coal mine hazard. There are no other critical areas
located on site.
11. There would be an estimated 6,400 CY of cut and 6,170 CY of fill associated with the proposed project.
12. Construction is anticipated to commence in April of 2016 with substantial completion scheduled for
May 2017.
13. No public or agency comments were received.
14. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.21C, 1971 as amended),
on November 2, 2015 the Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non-
Significance (DNS-M) for the Mission Healthcare at Renton (Exhibit 13). The DNS-M included one
mitigation measure. A 14-day appeal period commenced on November 6, 2015 and ended on
November 20, 2015. No appeals of the threshold determination were filed.
15. Based on an analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, the Environmental Review Committee
(ERC) issued the following mitigation measures with the Determination of Non-Significance -Mitigated:
1. A narrative shall be included in the final geotechnical report, discussing any measures employed in
the final site/building design which serve to mitigate the low coal mine subsidence risk identified. If
no measures are employed, the applicant shall provide justification for the exclusion of additional
measures. The final geotechnical report shall be submitted to, and reviewed by the City, prior to
building permit issuance.
16. Representatives from various city departments have reviewed the application materials to identify and
address issues raised by the proposed development. These comments are contained in the official file,
and the essence of the comments has been incorporated into the appropriate sections of this report
and the Departmental Recommendation at the end of this report.
17. Comprehensive Plan Compliance: The site is designated Commercial Mixed Use (CMU) on the City's
Comprehensive Plan Map. The purpose of the CMU designation is to allow residential uses as part of
mixed-use developments, and support new office and commercial development that is more intensive
than what exists to create a vibrant district and increase employment opportunities. The intention of
this designation is to transform strip commercial development into business districts through the
intensification of uses and with cohesive site planning, landscaping, signage, circulation, parking, and
the provision of public amenity features. The proposal is compliant with the following Comprehensive
Plan Goals and Policies if fill conditions of approval are met:
Compliance Comprehensive Plan Analysis
Policy L-37: Land uses in areas subject to flooding, seismic, geologic, and coal mine
,I" hazards should be designed to prevent property damage and environmental
degradation before, during, and after construction.
Goal L-L: Transform concentrations of pre-existing linear form commercial areas in into
,I" multi-use neighborhood centers characterized by enhanced site planning, efficient
parking design, coordinated access for all modes of transportation, pedestrian linkages
from adjacent uses and nearby neighborhoods, and boulevard treatment.
,I" Goal L-BB: Maintain a high quality of life as Renton grows by ensuring that new
development is designed to be functional and attractive.
,I" Goal L-FF: Strengthen the visual identity of Renton and its Community Planning Areas
and neighborhoods through quality design and development.
HEX Report
City of Renton Department of Com Jty & Economic Development Hearing Examiner Recommendation
LUAlS-000736, ECF, SA-H, CU-A MISSION HEALTHCARE AT RENTO
Report of December 8, 2015 Page 5 of 30
Policy L-51: Respond to specific site conditions such as topography, natural features,
,/ and solar access to encourage energy savings and recognize the unique features of the
site through the design of subdivisions and new buildings.
Policy L-52: Include human-scale features such as pedestrian pathways, quality
,/ landscaping, and public spaces that have discernible edges, entries, and borders to
create a distinctive sense of place in neighborhoods, commercial areas, and centers.
,/ Policy L-53: Orient buildings in developments toward the street or a common area,
rather than toward parking lots.
,/ Policy L-61: Improve the appearance of parking lots through landscaping and screening.
18. Zoning Development Standard Compliance: The site is classified CA on the City's Zoning Map.
Development in the CA Zone is intended to evolve from "strip commercial" linear business districts to
business areas characterized by enhanced site planning and pedestrian orientation, incorporating
efficient parking lot design, coordinated access, amenities and boulevard treatment with greater
densities. The proposal is compliant with the following development standards if all conditions of
approval are met:
Compliance CA Zone Develop Standards and Analysis
N/A
Density: Per RMC 4-2-120A the allowed density range in the CA zoning classification is
a minimum of 20 dwelling units per net acre (du/ac) up to a maximum of 60 du/ac.
N/A Lot Dimensions: Per RMC 4-2-120A the minimum lot size, in the CA zone, is 5,000
square feet.
Lot Coverage: Per RMC 4-2-120A the allowed lot coverage is 65 percent for proposals
within the CA classification . .,
Staff Comment: The proposed building would hove a footprint of 18,133 square feet
an the 76,615 square foot site resulting in a building lot coverage of approximately
23. 6 percent.
Setbacks: Per RMC 4-2-120A the CA zoning designation requires a minimum front yard
of setback of 10 feet which may be reduced to zero feet during the site plan
development review process, provided blank walls are not located within the reduced
setback. There is a maximum front yard setback of 15 feet. The CA zone has no rear
or side yard setback except 15 feet if lot abuts or is adjacent to a residential zone.
Staff_ Comment: The following table contains setbacks, at the closest point, for the
proposed structure:
,/ North Side Yard West Front Yard East Rear Along a Street South Side Yard
Setback Yard Setback Setback Setback
10feet 157 feet 27 feet and 6-inches 90+feet
The proposal complies with the setbacks of the CA zone. It should be noted that the
entry canopy along SE 174" St extends into front setback slightly by no more than
three feet. Staff is in support of the request, to encroach into the minimum front yard
setback, given there is not a blank wall located within the reduced setback.
,/ Building Standards: Per RMC 4-2-120A building height is restricted to 50 feet except
60 feet for mixed use (commercial and residential) in the same building.
HEX Report
City of Renton Deportment of Comm,.1ity & Economic Development
MISSION HEALTHCARE AT RENTOI
Hearing Examiner Recommendation
LUAlS-000736, ECF, SA-H, CU-A
Report of December 8, 2015 Page 6 of 30
Compliant if
condition of
approval is
met
N/A
Compliontif
condition of
approval is
met
HEX Report
Staff Comment: The height of the proposed structure would be 48 feet at the tallest
point of the proposed hipped mansard roof elements. The proposal complies with the
height requirement of the zone.
Landscaping: The City's landscape regulations (RMC 4-4-070) require a 10-foot
landscape strip along all public street frontages. Additional minimum planting strip
widths between the curb and sidewalk are established according to the street
development standards of RMC 4-6-060.
Staff Comment: A conceptual landscape plan was submitted with the project
application (Exhibit 3}. The conceptual landscape plan illustrates plant materials that
would be used to enhance the visual character of the building.
The applicant has proposed landscaping along the frontages of the site exceeding the
10-foot landscape requirement with intervening pedestrian walkways and retaining
walls.
The proposed landscaping utilizes several different species of trees including columnar
zelkova, flowering pear, katsura, vine maple, cypress and pine trees. Shrubbery
proposed, include: redtwig dogwood, spirea, delavay asmanthus, heavenly bamboo,
burning bush, ruby glow witch hazel, coral bells, Oregon grape, and others.
Per RMC 4-4-080 25 square feet of landscaping per parking stall is required for parking
areas with 50 -100 stalls. A total of 1,400 square feet of landscaping is required based
on the 56 proposed parking stalls. The applicant is proposing a total of 3,425 square
feet af interior 20,037 square feet of landscaping on site and meets the requirements
of parking area landscaping.
The applicant has also thoughtfully incorporated landscaping on site in order to create
active and passive recreation opportunities as well as to separate parking and drive
aisles into smaller areas in most places.
However, the eastern most parking aisle is continuous and does not include a break for
interior landscaping which would serve to improve and soften the appearance of the
parking areo. Additionally, staff is recommending the use of terracing for the retaining
walls which exceed the height allowances af the code (See FOF 20, Site Plan Review
Criteria and Analysis: Natural Features}. Therefore staff recommends, as a condition
of approval, the applicant revise the landscape plan to include additional interior
parking lot landscaping to break continuous parking aisles ond reflect compliance with
the retaining wall requirements of the code. The revised landscape plan shall be
submitted to, and approved by, the Current Planning Project Manager prior to
construction permit approval.
Tree Retention: The City's adopted Tree Retention and Land Clearing Regulations
require the retention of 10 percent of trees in a commercial development.
Screening:
Stoff Comment: Roof-mounted mechanical equipment is located behind pitched
mansard roof forms in order to prevent visibility from the street. The applicant did not
provide details for surface equipment and/or screening identified for such equipment.
As such staff recommends, as a condition of approval, the applicant provide a detailed
screening plan identifying the location and screening provided for surface and roof
mounted equipment. The screening pion shall be submitted to, and approved by, the
Current Planning Project Manager prior to building permit approval.
City of Renton Department of Com , ity & Economic Development
MISSION HEALTHCARE AT RENTO
Hearing Examiner Recommendation
LUAlS-000736, ECF, SA-H, CU-A
Report of December 8, 2015 Page 7 of 30
Parking: The parking regulations, RMC 4-4-080, require a specific number of off-street
parking stalls be provided based on number of beds proposed and number of
anticipated employees.
Stott Comment: The following ratios would be applicable to the site:
Use t!. Qf Emela~ees art!. Ratio Required Seaces
Qf beds
,,,, Beds 60 1 space I 3 beds 20
Employees 72 1 space/ 2 employees 36
Based on the proposed uses, a minimum of 56 parking spaces would be required in
order to meet code. The applicant proposed a total of 56 spaces within a surface
parking area to the south and east of the structure (36 standard stalls, 16 compact
stalls, and 4 ADA stalls). The proposal complies with the parking ratios of the code.
The parking also conforms to the minimum requirements for drive aisle and parking
stall dimensions and the provision of ADA accessible parking stalls.
N/A Loading Docks
Refuse and Recyclables: Per RMC 4-4-090 for institutional developments a minimum
of 2 square feet per 1,000 square feet of building gross floor area is required for
recyclable deposit areas and a minimum of 4 square feet per 1,000 square feet of
building gross floor area is required for refuse deposit areas.
,,,, Stott Comment: Based an the proposal for a total of 54,000 square feet of gross floor
area; a minimum area of 324 square feet of refuse and recycle area would be required.
The applicant is proposing to locate the refuse and recycle utility along the southern
far;ade of the structure with an area totaling 388 square feet which complies with the
requirements of the code.
Vehicles: Per RMC 4-2-120 a connection shall be provided for site-to-site vehicle
access ways, where topographically feasible, to allow a smooth flow of traffic across
abutting CA parcels without the need to use a street. Access may comprise the aisle
between rows of parking stalls but is not allowed between a building and a public
street. ,,,,
Staff Comment: This section of code is intended to provide vehicular connections to
abutting commercial uses. The proposal is bordered by a chiropractor office to the
south and McDonalds to the east. Existing vehicular connections to the abutting uses
are established. The applicant is proposing to retain the vehicular connectivity
currently enjoyed.
19. Critical Areas: Project sites which contain critical areas are required to comply with the Critical Areas
Regulations (RMC 4-3-050). The proposal is consistent with the Critical Areas Regulations, if all
conditions of approval are complied with:
HEX Report
Compliant if
condition of
approval is
met
Geologically Hazardous Areas:
Staff Comment: According to the Coal Mine Hazard Study, prepared by Golder
Associates, dated February 24, 2015, the subject site is located in a medium coal mine
hazard zone as defined by RMC 4-3-050 (Exhibit 7). Medium coal mine hazards are
defined as areas where mining workings are deeper than two-hundred feet for steeply
dipping seams, or deeper than 15 times the thickness of the seam or workings for
City of Renton Department of Comm ·1ity & Economic Development
MISSION HEALTHCARE AT RENTOI
Hearing Examiner Recommendation
LUAlS-000736, ECF, SA-H, CU-A
Report of December 8, 2015 Page 8 of 30
gently dipping seams. The site is not underlain by any mapped or known coal mine
workings. However, due to the proximity of the adjacent coal seam, development on
the site may potentially be affected by mining related subsidence. Given the age of
the mine workings and other factors it is likely the any subsidence that occurred as a
result of the abandoned mines would have already occurred and a low risk of regional
or trough subsidence exists on the site. The report however recommends potential
measures in order to mitigate the low risk which include: the avoidance of settlement
of sensitive exterior building finishes (stucco); the increase of the fall of gravity
utilities; and the increase of stiffness of foundation element Therefore, the
Environmental Review Committee imposed a mitigation measure requiring a narrative
within the final geotechnical report, discussing any measures employed in the final
site/building design which serve to mitigate the low coal mine subsidence risk, If no
measures are employed, the applicant shall provide justification for the exclusion of
additional measures.
20. Site Plan Review: Pursuant to RMC 4-9-200.B, Site Plan Review is required for development in the CA
zoning classification when it is not exempt from Environmental (SEPA) Review. Site Plan applications
are evaluated for compliance with the specific requirements of the RMC 4-9-200.E.3 the following table
contains project elements intended to comply with level of detail needed for the Site Plan review
requests:
Compliance Site Plan Criteria and Analysis
Compliant if a. Comprehensive Plan Compliance and consistency.
Conditions of
Staff Comment: See previous discussion under FOF 17, Comprehensive Plan Analysis. Approval ore
Met
Compliant if b. Zoning Compliance and Consistency.
Conditions of
Staff Comment: See discussion under FOF 18, Zoning Development Standard Approval are
Met Compliance.
Compliant if c. Design Regulation Compliance and Consistency.
Conditions of
Staff Comment: See discussion under FOF 22, Design District Review. Approval are
Met
N/A d. Planned action ordinance and Development agreement Compliance and
Consistency.
e. Off Site Impacts.
Structures: Restricting overscale structures and overconcentration of development
on a particular portion of the site.
Compliant if Sta([_ Comment: While the proposed structure is concentrated in one area, the
Conditions of northwest portion of the site, the scale and bulk of the structure is intended to
Approval are articulate at varying widths and depths. The applicant is also proposing canopies,
Met enhanced landscaping and street furniture which enhance the pedestrian experience.
While the applicant has incorporated design elements ta reduce the apparent bulk of
the building, additional elements should be incorporated into the design in order to
break the monotony of the street facing fa,ades and comply with the intent af this
standard. There/are, staff recommended a condition of design approval, the applicant
submit revised elevations depicting additional design elements (see FOF 22 Design
HEX Report
City of Renton Department of Com
MISSION HEALTHCARE AT RENTO
Report of December 8, 2015
ity & Economic Development Hearing Examiner Recommendation
LUAlS-000736, ECF, SA-H, CU-A
Page 9 of 30
HEX Report
District Review: Ground Level Details).
Circulation: Providing desirable transitions and linkages between uses, streets,
walkways and adjacent properties.
Stoff Comment: The subject development is proposing to toke access via a driveway
from 106th Pl SE within on existing ingress/egress easement along the south property
line. Existing vehicular connections to the abutting uses ore established. The
applicant is proposing to retain the vehicular connectivity currently enjoyed.
The proposed surface parking is naturally separated into smaller areas by terracing
into the existing site slope, with perimeter and internal landscaping. Access ta the
parking area is from the driveway in the existing ingress/egress easement along the
south (internal side) property line.
The proposal promotes safe and efficient circulation through the shored access points.
The proposed pedestrian circulation system helps to promote a walkable, pedestrian
oriented, community and would provide eventual linkages to SE Corr Rd and 108'h Ave
SE. However, it appears the site plan does not provide code required connections to
neighboring properties (specifically to the east) or to the sidewalk proposed along SE
174t St. Stoff hos recommended a condition of approval requiring the applicant to
provide additional pedestrian connections to the circulation system (See FOF 22
Design District Review: Pedestrian Circulation).
Loading and Storage Areas: Locating, designing and screening storage areas, utilities,
rooftop equipment, loading areas, and refuse and recyclables to minimize views from
surrounding properties.
Staff Comment: See FOF 18, Zoning Development Standard: Screening.
Views: Recognizing the public benefit and desirability of maintaining visual
accessibility to attractive natural features.
Staff Comment: There is an existing commercial use ta the east {McDonald's) that has
enjoyed the benefit of territorial views to the west. However, it has been anticipated
that the subject site would be developed at an intensity equal to, or greater than,
what is currently proposed. Furthermore, the natural topography at the side slopes
from east to west placing the McDonald's at a slightly higher elevation then the
finished floor of the proposed building (approximately 30 feet.). Due to the elevation
changes and topographical conditions staff believes that a portion of the existing view
corridor may be maintained. Staff received no comments from adjacent properties
regarding views.
Landscaping: Using landscaping to provide transitions between development and
surrounding properties to reduce noise and glare, maintain privacy, and generally
enhance the appearance of the project.
Stoff Comment: See discussion under FOF 18, Zoning Development Standard:
Landscaping.
Lighting: Designing and/or placing exterior lighting and glazing in order to avoid
excessive brightness or glare to adjacent properties and streets.
Staff Comment: A lighting plan was not provided with the application; therefore staff
recommended that a lighting plan be provided at the time of building permit review
{See Lighting discussion under FOF 22, Design Review: Lighting).
City of Renton Department of Comrr,,1ity & Economic Development
MISSION HEALTHCARE AT RENTO,
Hearing Examiner Recommendation
WA15-000736, ECF, SA-H, CU-A
Report of December 8, 2015 Page 10 of 30
Compliant If
Condition of
Approvolis
Met
HEX Report
f. On Site Impacts.
Structure Placement: Provisions for privacy and noise reduction by building
placement, spacing and orientation.
Staff Comment: It is anticipated that most of the noise impacts would occur during the
construction phase of the project. The applicant has submitted o Construction
Mitigation Plan that provides measures to reduce construction impacts such as noise,
control of dust, traffic controls, etc. In addition, the project would be required to
comply with the City's noise ordinance regarding construction hours.
Incidental noise moy be generated by ambulances arriving and departing, and
deliveries, when the trucks'/vans' backup signals sound. However, the drop off/pick-
up area has been located on the structures southern fa,ade which is located
approximately 250 feet from the neighboring multi-family units. Staff received no
public comments regarding noise concerns.
Structure Scale: Consideration of the scale of proposed structures in relation to
natural characteristics, views and vistas, site amenities, sunlight, prevailing winds, and
pedestrian and vehicle needs.
Staff Comment: While the proposed structure is concentrated in one oreo, the
northwestern portion of the site, the scale and bulk would be reduced as viewed from
neighboring properties to the east and south due to the increase in setbacks.
The scale and bulk of the remainder af the structure is attempted to be reduced
through the use of differing materials on the building facades, building articulation
and modulation and differing roof profiles. The building materials vary and are a
combination of painted lap siding, stone, stucco, and vinyl windows (Exhibit 4). The
stone along the street frontage has been wrapped inta the courtyard as a base to
reduce the scale of the building. Upper story windows will have clear (untinted)
glazing.
While the applicant has incorporated design elements to reduce the apparent bulk of
the building, additional elements should be incorporated into the design in order to
break the monotony of the street facing fa,ades and comply with the intent of this
standard. This standard could be met with the incorporation of additional ground
level detail (see discussion under FOF 22, Design District Review: Ground Level
Details}.
The pedestrian courtyards have been strategically placed on site in order take
advantage of sun exposure from the south and west most times af the year and wauld
likely only be shaded at certain times of the day during the winter months.
Natural Features: Protection of the natural landscape by retaining existing
vegetation and soils, using topography to reduce undue cutting and filling, and
limiting impervious surfaces.
Staff Comment: The majority of the site is covered in grasses and brush. There are na
significant trees on site.
The existing site is relatively flat with a slope from the east to the west sides of the
project site. The pervious portion of the parcel is generally pasture with an existing
coffee stand and access road. The topography of the site slopes from approximately
380 feet on the east side of the property to approximately 350 feet on the west side of
the site. The steepest slope on the site is approximately 10% along the eastern half of
City of Renton Department of Cam -;ty & Economic Development Hearing Examiner Recommendation
LUAlS-000736, ECF, SA-H, CU-A MISSION HEALTHCARE AT RENTO
Report of December 8, 2015 Page 11 of 30
HEX Report
Compliant if
Condition of
Approval is
Met
the property. The applicant is proposing several retaining walls ranging in height from
2 to 13 feet in order ta support grode changes an the east and west sides of the
building primarily for parking. RMC 4-4-080 limits the maximum height of retaining
walls to 8-feet. Therefore staff recommends, as a condition of approval, the applicant
be required to revise the site and grading plans in order to comply with the maximum
retaining wall heights. The revised site and grading plans shall be submitted to, and
approved by, the Current Planning Project Manager prior to building permit approval.
The applicant should note that landscaped terracing between retaining walls, can be
used when the maximum height of a single retaining wall exceeds the maximum.
The existing site includes approximately 26,000 square feet of impervious area.
Following development, impervious surface coverage would be approximately 75
percent.
According to the Geotechnical Engineering Report prepared by the Golder Associates
dated August 17, 2015, the soils encountered during field exploration include native
ablation and lodgement till (Exhibit 5). According to the report, a groundwater
seepage was encountered at depths of about 9.5 to 12.2 feet below grade. The depths
would depend on the season and precipitation.
The report states that standard construction methods and spread footings appear
feasible from a geotechnical standpoint. Structural fill placement of up to about 8 feet
would be required on the west side of the proposed pad.
There would be an estimated 6,400 CY of cut and 6,170 CY of fill associated with the
proposed project. Removal of the existing impervious cover during construction would
leave soils susceptible to erosion. The applicant will be required to design a
Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) pursuant to the 2009 King
County Surface Water Design Manual Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements.
Landscaping: Use of landscaping to soften the appearance of parking areas, to
provide shade and privacy where needed, to define and enhance open spaces, and
generally to enhance the appearance of the project. Landscaping also includes the
design and protection of planting areas so that they are less susceptible to damage
from vehicles or pedestrian movements.
Staff Comment: See FOF 18, Zoning Development Standard: Landscaping.
g. Access
Location and Consolidation: Providing access points on side streets or frontage
streets rather than directly onto arterial streets and consolidation of ingress and
egress points on the site and, when feasible, with adjacent properties.
Staff Comment: The subject development is proposing to toke access via a single curb
cut along 106th Pl SE with an additional connection to the neighboring commercial
property to the east. The proposal promotes safe and efficient circulation through
the shared access points.
Internal Circulation: Promoting safety and efficiency of the internal circulation
system, including the location, design and dimensions of vehicular and pedestrian
access points, drives, parking, turnarounds, walkways, bikeways, and emergency
access ways.
Staff Comment: See Location and Consolidation discussion above.
Loading and Delivery: Separating loading and delivery areas from parking and
City of Renton Deportment of Com ' ity & Economic Development
MISSION HEALTHCARE AT RENTO
Hearing Examiner Recommendation
LUA15-000736, ECF, SA-H, CU-A
Report of December 8, 2015 Page 12 of 30
pedestrian areas.
Staff Comment: Not applicable.
Transit and Bicycles: Providing transit, carpools and bicycle facilities and access.
Stat[ Comment: Per RMC 4-4-080F.11 0.5 bicycle the number af bicycle parking spaces
shall be 10% of the number af required off-street parking spaces. Based on the
proposal which requires a minimum 56 vehicle parking stalls, 6 bicycle parking stalls
are required ta be provided. The applicant is proposing bicycle rock, with 6 bicycle
parking stalls, near the service/staff entronce. It is however recommended that the
applicant consider relocating the bicycle rock ta a location where it can be weather
protected.
Pedestrians: Providing safe and attractive pedestrian connections between parking
areas, buildings, public sidewalks and adjacent properties.
Stat[ Comment: Internal pedestrian connections are proposed to connect to the new
sidewalk along 106" Place S and throughout the site. However, it appears the site
plan does not provide code required connections to neighboring properties
(specifically to the east) or to the sidewalk proposed along SE 174t St. Staff has
recommended a condition of approval requiring the applicant to provide additional
connections to the circulation system (See FOF 22 Design District Review: Pedestrian
Circulation).
h. Open Space: Incorporating open spaces to serve as distinctive project focal
points and to provide adequate areas for passive and active recreation by the
,/ occupants/users of the site.
Staff Comment: See FOF 22, Design District Compliance: Recreation Areas and
Common Open Space.
i. Views and Public Access: When possible, providing view corridors to shorelines
,/
and Mt. Rainier, and incorporating public access to shorelines
Stat[ Comment: The proposed structure would not block view corridors to shorelines or
Mt. Rainier. The public access requirement is not applicable to the proposal.
j. Natural Systems: Arranging project elements to protect existing natural systems
,/
where applicable.
Stat[ Comment: There are no natural systems located on site with the exception of
drainage flows. See Drainage discussion below.
k. Services and Infrastructure: Making available public services and facilities to
accommodate the proposed use:
Police and Fire.
Staff. Comment: Police and Fire Prevention staff indicated that sufficient resources
,/
exist to furnish services ta the proposed development; if the applicant provides Code
required improvements and fees. A Fire Impact Fee, based on a rate of $3.88 per
square foot of gross floor area would be applicable to the proposal.
Water and Sewer.
Staft Comment: Water service would be provided by Soos Creek Water and Sewer
District. A water availability certificate would be required to be submitted to the City
prior to construction permit approval. Sewer service would be provided by Soos Creek
HEX Report
City of Renton Department of Com -ity & Economic Development Hearing Examiner Recommendation
WA15-000736, ECF, SA·H, CU-A MISSION HEALTHCARE AT RENTO
Report of December 8, 2015 Page 13 of 30
HEX Report
Water and Sewer District. A sewer availability certificate would be required ta be
submitted to the City prior ta construction permit approval.
Drainage.
Staff Comment: The project site is located in the Black River basin. In the existing
conditions, the site drains to the northwest and stormwater enters the existing storm
drain system at the intersection of SE 174th Street and 106'h Place SE. Flows ore
captured in a 18-inch storm pipe in SE 174th and continues in a piped system west in
103"' Ave SE and connects to a 24 -inch storm pipe where flows outfall into a wetland
to the west. Na downstream or flooding issues were identified by City staff
This project is required to comply with the 2009 King County Surface Water Manual
and the City of Renton Amendments to the KCSWM, Chapter 1 and 2. Based on the
City's flow control map, this site falls within the Flow Control Duration Standard,
Forested Conditions. This project is subject to full drainage review. The applicant
submitted a "Technical Information Report," prepared by ESM Civil, doted October 7,
2015 (Exhibit 6}.
The submitted drainage report includes the 8 core requirements, but only includes
Special Requirement #2. All special requirements (six) must be included in the
drainage report submitted with the utility construction permit.
The report also includes a detailed summary of the pre and post developed conditions.
The stormwater detention and water quality treatment would be provided within a
combined detention/water quality vault under the parking lot located in the
southwest corner of the site. The combined detention/water quality vault would
discharge west to the existing storm water conveyance system in the intersection of SE
174'h Street ond 106'h Place SE in the project's northwest corner frontage. The
stormwater drainage conveyance system will be sized as part of the final TIR to convey
the 25 year design storm event and to contain the 100 year design storm event. The
approximate vault footprint is 40 feet wide by 125 feet long. Additional water quality
treatment would be provided by modular wetlands/stormwater biofiltration systems
for any flow that bypasses the primary water quality vault.
Transportation.
Staff Comment: Access is proposed via 106'h Place SE with an additional connection to
the neighboring commercial property to the east. The project will utilize the three
existing driveways as access points to the surrounding street network. No additional
access points are proposed as a part of the project. The applicant submitted o Traffic
Impact Analysis (TIA} prepared by Concord Engineering, dated October 21, 2015
(Exhibit 8}.
The provided TIA was found to meet the intent of the TIA guidelines and is generally
acceptable for preliminary review with recommendations for minor revisions which
are not anticipated to change the likelihood of significant adverse impacts.
Level of Service: It is anticipated that the proposed development would generate
approximately 422 average daily trips with 31 AM peak-hour trips and 41 PM peak-
hour trips. The provided report analyzed five intersections (Exhibit 8):
Intersection 1: Benson Drive S / SE 174th St
Intersection 2: 108'h Place SE/ SE Petrovitsky Rd
Intersection 3: SE Carr Rd/ 106'h Place SE
City of Renton Department ofComrr ·-ity & Economic Development
MISSION HEALTHCARE AT RENTOI
Hearing Examiner Recommendation
WAlS-000736, ECF, SA-H, CU-A
Report of December 8, 2015 Page 14 of 30
N/A
Intersection 4: Benson Drive SI Benson Rd S
Intersection 5: SE 174'h St/ 106'h Place SE
The provided analysis notes that all intersections will operate at the same LOS (E or
better) with or without the project with no more than a second delay. Therefore the
proposal would not be required to mitigate at any intersection.
Street Improvements: Street improvements along SE 174th St and 106'h Pl would
include 18 feet of poving from the centerline, an 8-foot planting strip and a 6-foot
sidewalk. No dedication of additional right of woy is required. Street improvements
are proposed as required.
Site Distance: The site distance wos evaluated at the intersection of 1061h Place SE
and S 174'h St and it appears thot the stopping distance is in excess of 500 feet which
exceeds minimum standards.
Impact Fees: Increased traffic created by the development on the remainder of the
transportation system would be mitigated by payment of transportation impact fees.
Currently this fee would be assessed at $21,966.69 per Ordinance #5670. The fee is
expected to increase in 2016, to $27,994.89, and is determined by the Renton
Municipal Code at the time of building permit issuance.
Concurrency: Staff recommends a transportation concurrency approval based upon a
test of the citywide Transportation Plan, consideration of growth levels included in the
LOS-tested Transportation Plan, payment of a Transportation Mitigation Fee, and an
application of site specific mitigation (Exhibit 14).
I. Phasing: The applicant is not requesting any additional phasing.
21. Conditional Use Analysis: Convalescent Centers are permitted through an Administrative Conditional
Use Permit in to CA zone. The Conditional use Permit would be heard by the City's Hearing Examiner if
any other land use entitlement requires a public hearing. The proposal is compliant with the following
conditional use criteria, pursuant to RMC 4-9-030. Therefore, staff recommends approval of the
requested Conditional Use Permit:
Compliance Conditional Use Criteria and Analysis
a. Consistency with Plans and Regulations: The proposed use shall be compatible
with the general goals, objectives, policies and standards of the Comprehensive
Plan, the zoning regulations and any other plans, programs, maps or ordinances .,,. of the City of Renton.
Staff Comment: See FOF 17 for Comprehensive Plan and FOF 18 for Zoning regulation
compliance.
b. Appropriate Location: The proposed location shall not result in the detrimental
overconcentration of a particular use within the City or within the immediate area
of the proposed use. The proposed location shall be suited for the proposed use .
.,,. Staff Comment: The proposed location of the short term rehabilitation facility is not
expected to result in o detrimental overconcentration of this type of use within the City
or within the immediate areo. The proposed facility would serve to complement Valley
Medical Center which is within close proximity to the west.
.,,. c . Effect on Adjacent Properties: The proposed use at the proposed location shall
HEX Report
City of Renton Deportment of Com
MISSION HEALTHCARE AT RENTO
ity & Economic Development Hearing Examiner Recommendation
WA15-000736, ECF, SA-H, CU-A
Report of December 8, 2015 Page 15 of 30
not result in substantial or undue adverse effects on adjacent property.
Staff Comment: The proposed use of a short term rehabilitation facility is not expected
ta adversely impact adjacent properties. It is anticipated that a calm and quite
atmosphere at the facility would be the best situation for the patient needs. Based on
this impacts are nat anticipated ta the adjacent retail, commercial, and residential
multi-family developments.
d. Compatibility: The proposed use shall be compatible with the scale and character
of the neighborhood.
,I" Staff Comment: The proposed use is compatible with the scale and character of the
neighborhood including the synergy with the surrounding uses such as a chiropractor
office, CVS pharmacy, and Valley Medical Center.
e. Parking: Adequate parking is, or will be made, available.
,I"
Staff Comment: See FOF 18 for Zoning and Development Standard Analysis: Parking.
f. Traffic: The use shall ensure safe movement for vehicles and pedestrians and
,I" shall mitigate potential effects on the surrounding area.
Staff_ Comment: See FOF 20 for Site Plan Review and Analysis: Transportation.
g. Noise, Light and Glare: Potential noise, light and glare impacts from the
proposed use shall be evaluated and mitigated.
Staff_ Comment: Noise, light, and glare produced from the proposed project is
anticipated to be typical of o commercial development. Light and glare from the site
Compliant if would primarily consist af street lighting, security lighting, exterior lighting and
Condition of headlights from vehicles entering or leaving the site. Staff will be recommending a
Approval is condition of approval which requires the applicant to provide a lighting plan that
Met adequately provides far public safety without costing excessive glare on adjacent
properties; at the time af building permit review {See FOF 22, Design District Guideline
and Standard Analysis: Lighting).
For noise discussion see FOF 20, Site Plan Review and Analysis: Structure Placement.
h. Landscaping: Landscaping shall be provided in all areas not occupied by buildings,
paving, or critical areas. Additional landscaping may be required to buffer
,I" adjacent properties from potentially adverse effects of the proposed use.
Staff_ Comment: See FOF 18 for Zoning and Development Standard Analysis:
Landscaping.
22. Design District Review: The project site is located within Design District 'D'. The following table
contains project elements intended to comply with the standards of the Design District 'D' Standards
and guidelines, as outlined in RMC 4-3-100.E:
Compliance I Design District Guideline and Standard Analysis
1. SITE DESIGN AND BUILDING LOCATION:
Intent: To ensure that buildings are located in relation to streets and other buildings so that the Vision
of the City of Renton can be realized for a high-density urban environment; so that businesses enjoy
visibility from public rights-of-way; and to encourage pedestrian activity.
a. Building Location and Orientation:
HEX Report
City of Renton Deportment of Com
MISSION HEALTHCARE AT RENTOI
ity & Economic Development Hearing Examiner Recommendation
WA15-000736, ECF, SA-H, CU-A
Report of December 8, 2015 Page 16 of 30
Intent: To ensure visibility of businesses and to establish active, lively uses along sidewalks and
pedestrian pathways. To organize buildings for pedestrian use and so that natural light is available to
other structures and open space. To ensure an appropriate transition between buildings, parking
areas, and other land uses; and increase privacy for residential uses.
Guidelines: Developments shall enhance the mutual relationship of buildings with each other, as well
as with the roads, open space, and pedestrian amenities while working to create a pedestrian
oriented environment. Lots shall be configured to encourage variety and so that natural light is
available to buildings and open space. The privacy of individuals in residential uses shall be provided
for.
Compliant if
Condition of
Approval is
Met
N/A
Standard: The availability of natural light (both direct and reflected) and direct sun
exposure to nearby buildings and open space (except parking areas) shall be
considered when siting structures.
Standard: Buildings shall be oriented to the street with clear connections to the
sidewalk.
Staff Comment: The proposed project is on a parcel fronting on SE 174th Place to the
north and 106th Place SE to the west. The building is oriented so that its southern
facade shares a relationship Benson Rd S. The applicant is proposing new pedestrian
open spaces and connections ta the west of the structure. However, an additional
connection should be made from the interior pedestrian pathways to the new
sidewalk along SE 174'' St (See Pedestrian Circulation discussion be/aw). If a//
conditions of approval are met the proposal is inviting and comfortable for
pedestrians and provides a mutual relationship with existing uses as we// as with the
roads, open space, and pedestrian amenities while working to create a pedestrian
oriented environment.
Standard: The front entry of a building shall be oriented to the street or a landscaped
pedestrian-only courtyard.
Staff Comment: The primary southern entrance would be sheltered by a connector
canopy to a covered vehicle drop-off for use by skilled nursing residents and their
families, as required by the Washington Administrative Code. Two other entrances
are provided to the building: a pedestrian entrance on the north fa,ade along SE
174th Sand a service entrance, not fronting on either street side.
Standard: Buildings with residential uses located at the street level shall be:
a. Set back from the sidewalk a minimum often feet (10') and feature
substantial landscaping between the sidewalk and the building; or
b. Have the ground floor residential uses raised above street level for
residents' privacy.
b. Building Entries:
Intent: To make building entrances convenient to locate and easy to access, and ensure that building
entries further the pedestrian nature of the fronting sidewalk and the urban character of the district.
Guidelines: Primary entries shall face the street, serve as a focal point, and allow space for social
interaction. All entries shall include features that make them easily identifiable while reflecting the
architectural character of the building. The primary entry shall be the most visually prominent entry.
Pedestrian access to the building from the sidewalk, parking lots, and/or other areas shall be provided
and shall enhance the overall quality of the pedestrian experience on the site.
HEX Report
City of Renton Department of Comm --'ty & Economic Development
MISSION HEALTHCARE AT RENT0/1
· 'earing Examiner Recommendation
WA15-000736, ECF, SA-H, CU-A
Report of December 8, 2015 Page 17 of 30
Standard: A primary entrance of each building shall be located on the facade facing a
street, shall be prominent, visible from the street, connected by a walkway to the
public sidewalk, and include human-scale elements.
Staff Comment: The primary southern entrance would be sheltered by a connector
canopy to a covered vehicle drop-aft far use by the skilled nursing residents and their
families. The provided elevations do not include details for the urban amenities such
as seating areas, lighting fixtures, public art, or vertical landscaping. And while the
plans do indicate color stamped concrete in this area, additional details are needed to
Compliant if ensure the proposal establishes a quality pedestrian experience along the street and
Conditions of at the entrances for the building. Therefore staff recommends, as a condition of
Approval are approval, the applicant submit a detailed common open space/plaza plan which
Met includes specifications for pedestrian amenities that add to the pedestrian experience
and the human scale intended for the development. The plan shall be submitted to,
and approved by, the Current Planning Project Manager prior to building permit
approval.
The pedestrian entrance on the north facade along SE 174th St would be sheltered and
visually emphasized by a one-story entry canopy. Pedestrian paths would be provided
from the sidewalk along SE 174th St to the pedestrian entrance on the north facade
and from the sidewalk along 106th Pl SE to the south entrance and the system of
walks leading to the on-site parking areas.
Compliant if Standard: A primary entrance of each building shall be made visibly prominent by
Conditions of incorporating architectural features such as a facade overhang, trellis, large entry
Approval are doors, and/or ornamental lighting.
Met Staff_ Comment: See discussion above.
Standard Building entries from a street shall be clearly marked with canopies,
architectural elements, ornamental lighting, or landscaping and include weather
,/ protection at least four and one-half feet (4-1/2') wide. Buildings that are taller than
thirty feet (30') in height shall also ensure that the weather protection is proportional
to the distance above ground level.
,/ Standard: Building entries from a parking lot shall be subordinate to those related to
the street.
Standard: Features such as entries, lobbies, and display windows shall be oriented to
,/ a street or pedestrian-oriented space; otherwise, screening or decorative features
should be incorporated.
Standard: Multiple buildings on the same site shall direct views to building entries by
N/A providing a continuous network of pedestrian paths and open spaces that incorporate
landscaping.
Standard: Ground floor residential units that are directly accessible from the street
N/A shall include entries from front yards to provide transition space from the street or
entries from an open space such as a courtyard or garden that is accessible from the
street.
c. Transition to Surrounding Development:
Intent: To shape redevelopment projects so that the character and value of Renton's long-
established, existing neighborhoods are preserved.
Guidelines: Careful siting and design treatment shall be used to achieve a compatible transition
HEX Report
City of Renton Deportment of Com
MISSION HEALTHCARE AT RENTO
Report of December 8, 2015
ity & Economic Development Hearing Examiner Recommendation
WAlS-000736, ECF, SA-H, CU-A
Page 18 of 30
where new buildings differ from surrounding development in terms of building height, bulk and scale.
,/
Standard: At least one of the following design elements shall be used to promote a
transition to surrounding uses:
1. Building proportions, including step-backs on upper levels in accordance with the
surrounding planned and existing land use forms; or
2. Building articulation to divide a larger architectural element into smaller
increments; or
3. Roof lines, roof pitches, and roof shapes designed to reduce apparent bulk and
transition with existing development.
Additionally, the Administrator may require increased setbacks at the side or rear of a
building in order to reduce the bulk and scale of larger buildings and/or so that
sunlight reaches adjacent and/or abutting yards.
Staff Comment: The topography af the subject site and layout of the building would
result in a separation of the proposed structure from adjoining properties and
neighboring structures. The building elevations include small step-backs on upper
levels, extensive articulation and o hipped mansard roof.
d. Service Element Location and Design:
Intent: To reduce the potential negative impacts of service elements (i.e., waste receptacles, loading
docks) by locating service and loading areas away from high-volume pedestrian areas, and screening
them from view in high visibility areas.
Guidelines: Service elements shall be concentrated and located so that impacts to pedestrians and
other abutting uses are minimized. The impacts of service elements shall be mitigated with
landscaping and an enclosure with fencing that is made of quality materials.
Compliant if
Conditions of
Approval are
Met
HEX Report
Standard: Service elements shall be located and designed to minimize the impacts on
the pedestrian environment and adjacent uses. Service elements shall be
concentrated and located where they are accessible to service vehicles and
convenient for tenant use.
Staff Comment: The service areas are proposed to be located along the southern
fa~ade, close to the staff/service entrance of the building, fully-screened from view
from the street within an enclosure which contains a roof.
Standard: In addition to standard enclosure requirements, garbage, recycling
collection, and utility areas shall be enclosed on all sides, including the roof and
screened around their perimeter by a wall or fence and have self-closing doors.
Standard: Service enclosures shall be made of masonry, ornamental metal or wood,
or some combination of the three (3).
Staff Comment: The proposed elevations do not specify the proposed materials for the
refuse ond recycle enclosure. Therefore staff recommends, as a condition of approval,
that the applicant submit revised elevations notating prapased materials far the
refuse and recycle enclosure. The enclosure shall be made of masonry, ornamental
metal or wood and shall be compatible the primary materials of the structure. The
revised elevations shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Current Planning
Project Manager prior to building permit approval.
Standard: If the service area is adjacent to a street, pathway, or pedestrian-oriented
City of Renton Department of Comm · ty & Economic Development
MISSION HEALTHCARE AT RENTO(\j
'earing Examiner Recommendation
WA15-000736, ECF, SA-H, CU-A
Report of December 8, 2015 Page 19 of 30
space, a landscaped planting strip, minimum 3 feet wide, shall be located on 3 sides
of such facility.
2. PARKING AND VEHICULAR ACCESS:
Intent: To provide safe, convenient access to the Urban Center and the Center Village; incorporate
various modes of transportation, including public mass transit, in order to reduce traffic volumes and
other impacts from vehicles; ensure sufficient parking is provided, while encouraging creativity in
reducing the impacts of parking areas; allow an active pedestrian environment by maintaining
contiguous street frontages, without parking lot siting along sidewalks and building facades; minimize
the visual impact of parking lots; and use access streets and parking to maintain an urban edge to the
district.
a. Surface Parking:
Intent: To maintain active pedestrian environments along streets by placing parking lots primarily in
back of buildings.
Guidelines: Surface parking shall be located and designed so as to reduce the visual impact of the
parking area and associated vehicles. Large areas of surface parking shall also be designed to
accommodate future infill development.
Standard: Parking shall be located so that no surface parking is located between:
,/ (a) A building and the front property line; and/or
(b) A building and the side property line (when on a corner lot).
,/ Standard: Parking shall be located so that it is screened from surrounding streets by
buildings, landscaping, and/or gateway features as dictated by location.
b. Structured Parking Garages:
Intent: To promote more efficient use of land needed for vehicle parking; encourage the use of
structured parking; physically and visually integrate parking garages with other uses; and reduce the
overall impact of parking garages.
Guidelines: Parking garages shall not dominate the streetscape; they shall be designed to be
complementary with adjacent and abutting buildings. They shall be sited to complement, not
subordinate, pedestrian entries. Similar forms, materials, and/or details to the primary building(s)
should be used to enhance garages.
Standard: Parking structures shall provide space for ground floor commercial uses
N/A along street frontages at a minimum of seventy five percent (75%) of the building
frontage width.
Standard: The entire facade must feature a pedestrian-oriented facade. The
Administrator of the Department of Community and Economic Development may
approve parking structures that do not feature a pedestrian orientation in limited
N/A
circumstances. If allowed, the structure shall be set back at least six feet (6') from the
sidewalk and feature substantial landscaping. This landscaping shall include a
combination of evergreen and deciduous trees, shrubs, and ground cover. This
setback shall be increased to ten feet (10') when abutting a primary arterial and/or
minor arterial.
N/A
Standard: Public facing facades shall be articulated by arches, lintels, masonry trim, or
other architectural elements and/or materials.
HEX Report
City of Renton Department of Com
MISSION HEALTHCARE AT RENTOI
ity & Economic Development Hearing Examiner Recommendation
LUA15-000736, ECF, SA-H, CU-A
Report of December 8, 2015 Page 20 of 30
N/A
Standard: The entry to the parking garage shall be located away from the primary
street, to either the side or rear of the building.
Standard: Parking garages at grade shall include screening or be enclosed from view
N/A with treatment such as walls, decorative grilles, trellis with landscaping, or a
combination of treatments.
Standard: The Administrator of the Department of Community and Economic
Development or designee may allow a reduced setback where the applicant can
successfully demonstrate that the landscaped area and/or other design treatment
meets the intent of these standards and guidelines. Possible treatments to reduce the
setback include landscaping components plus one or more of the following integrated
with the architectural design of the building:
(a) Ornamental grillwork (other than vertical bars);
N/A (b) Decorative artwork;
(c) Display windows;
(d) Brick, tile, or stone;
(e) Pre-cast decorative panels;
(f) Vine-covered trellis;
(g) Raised landscaping beds with decorative materials; or
(h)Other treatments that meet the intent of this standard ..
c. Vehicular Access:
Intent: To maintain a contiguous and uninterrupted sidewalk by minimizing, consolidating, and/or
eliminating vehicular access off streets.
Guidelines: Vehicular access to parking garages and parking lots shall not impede or interrupt
pedestrian mobility. The impacts of curb cuts to pedestrian access on sidewalks shall be minimized.
,/ Standard: Access to parking lots and garages shall be from alleys, when available. If
not available, access shall occur at side streets.
,/ Standard: The number of driveways and curb cuts shall be minimized, so that
pedestrian circulation along the sidewalk is minimally impeded.
3. PEDESTRIAN ENVIRONMENT:
Intent: To enhance the urban character of development in the Urban Center and the Center Village by
creating pedestrian networks and by providing strong links from streets and drives to building
entrances; make the pedestrian environment safer and more convenient, comfortable, and pleasant
to walk between businesses, on sidewalks, to and from access points, and through parking lots; and
promote the use of multi-modal and public transportation systems in order to reduce other vehicular
traffic.
a. Pedestrian Circulation:
Intent: To create a network of linkages for pedestrians to improve safety and convenience and
enhance the pedestrian environment.
Guidelines: The pedestrian environment shall be given priority and importance in the design of
projects. Sidewalks and/or pathways shall be provided and shall provide safe access to buildings from
parking areas. Providing pedestrian connections to abutting properties is an important aspect of
HEX Report
City of Renton Department of Com
MISSION HEALTHCARE AT RENTO
ity & Economic Development Hearing Examiner Recommendation
LUA15-000736, ECF, SA-H, CU-A
Report of December 8, 2015 Page 21 of 30
connectivity and encourages pedestrian activity and shall be considered. Pathways shall be easily
identifiable to pedestrians and drivers.
Compliant if
Conditions of
Approval are
Met
Compliant if
Condition of
Approval is Met
,/
N/A
HEX Report
Standard: A pedestrian circulation system of pathways that are clearly delineated and
connect buildings, open space, and parking areas with the sidewalk system and
abutting properties shall be provided.
{a) Pathways shall be located so that there are clear sight lines, to increase safety.
{b) Pathways shall be an all-weather or permeable walking surface, unless the
applicant can demonstrate that the proposed surface is appropriate for the
anticipated number of users and complementary to the design of the
development.
Staff Comment: Site topography and the building's proposed use (skilled nursing
facility) preclude proximity of the pedestrian path to the building facades over much of
the building's length. However, the opportunity to connect the interior pedestrian
network to SE 174'" St exists; which would also serve to provide o meaningful
connection from the subject site to the abutting property to the east (McDonald's).
Therefore staff recommends, as a condition of approval, the applicant submit a
revised site pion connecting the interior pedestrian network to SE 174th St sidewalk.
The revised site pion shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Current Planning
Project Manager prior to construction permit approval.
Standard: Pathways within parking areas shall be provided and differentiated by
material or texture {i.e., raised walkway, stamped concrete, or pavers) from abutting
paving materials. Permeable materials are encouraged. The pathways shall be
perpendicular to the applicable building facade and no greater than one hundred fifty
feet (150') apart.
Stoff Comment: The applicant hos proposed o series of pedestrian connections
throughout the site however it is unclear if there is o differentiation of materials
across the drive aisles (Exhibit 2). Therefore staff recommends, as a condition of
approval, the applicant revise the site pion to depict o differentiation in materials for
oil pedestrian connections within parking areas and/or drive aisles on site. The revised
site pion shall be submitted to ond approved by the Current Planning Project Manager
prior to building permit approval. If this condition of approval is met the proposal
would satisfy this standard.
Standard: Sidewalks and pathways along the facades of buildings shall be of sufficient
width to accommodate anticipated numbers of users. Specifically:
{a) Sidewalks and pathways along the facades of mixed use and retail buildings
100 or more feet in width {measured along the facade) shall provide sidewalks at
least 12 feet in width. The walkway shall include an 8 foot minimum unobstructed
walking surface.
{b) Interior pathways shall be provided and shall vary in width to establish a
hierarchy. The widths shall be based on the intended number of users; to be no
smaller than five feet {5') and no greater than twelve feet (12').
(c) For all other interior pathways, the proposed walkway shall be of sufficient
width to accommodate the anticipated number of users.
Standard: Mid-block connections between buildings shall be provided.
City of Renton Department of Com. -ity & Economic Development Hearing Examiner Recommendation
LUA15-000736, ECF, SA-H, CU-A MISSION HEALTHCARE AT RENTOI
Report of December 8, 2015 Page 22 of 30
b. Pedestrian Amenities:
Intent: To create attractive spaces that unify the building and street environments and are inviting
and comfortable for pedestrians; and provide publicly accessible areas that function for a variety of
year-round activities, under typical seasonal weather conditions.
Guidelines: The pedestrian environment shall be given priority and importance in the design of
projects. Amenities that encourage pedestrian use and enhance the pedestrian experience shall be
included.
Standard: Architectural elements that incorporate plants, particularly at building
Compliant if entrances, in publicly accessible spaces and at facades along streets, shall be
Condition of provided.
Approval is Met
Staff. Comment: See Building Entries and Ground Level Details discussion below.
Standard: Amenities such as outdoor group seating, benches, transit shelters,
fountains, and public art shall be provided.
(a) Site furniture shall be made of durable, vandal-and weather-resistant
Compliant if materials that do not retain rainwater and can be reasonably maintained over an
Condition of extended period of time.
Approval is Met
(b) Site furniture and amenities shall not impede or block pedestrian access to
public spaces or building entrances.
Stoft Comment: See Building Entries and Ground Level Details discussion below.
Standard: Pedestrian overhead weather protection in the form of awnings, marquees,
canopies, or building overhangs shall be provided. These elements shall be a
minimum of four and one-half feet (4-1/2') wide along at least seventy five percent
(75%) of the length of the building facade facing the street, a maximum height of
,I' fifteen feet (15') above the ground elevation, and no lower than eight feet (8') above
ground level.
Staff. Comment: The proposal includes a connector canopy which extends over the
entry drive aisle to provide weather protection at primary entry and vehicle drop off.
See additional discussion under Ground Level Details below.
4. RECREATION AREAS AND COMMON OPEN SPACE:
Intent: To ensure that areas for both passive and active recreation are available to residents, workers,
and visitors and that these areas are of sufficient size for the intended activity and in convenient
locations. To create usable and inviting open space that is accessible to the public; and to promote
pedestrian activity on streets particularly at street corners.
Guidelines: Developments located at street intersections should provide pedestrian-oriented space at
the street corner to emphasize pedestrian activity (illustration below). Recreation and common open
space areas are integral aspects of quality development that encourage pedestrians and users. These
areas shall be provided in an amount that is adequate to be functional and usable; they shall also be
landscaped and located so that they are appealing to users and pedestrians
N/A
Standard: All mixed use residential and attached housing developments of ten (10) or
more dwelling units shall provide common opens space and/or recreation areas.
Compliant if Standard: All buildings and developments with over thirty thousand (30,000) square
Condition of feet of nonresidential uses (excludes parking garage floorplate areas) shall provide
Approval is pedestrian-oriented space.
HEX Report
City of Renton Department of Com
MISSION HEALTHCARE AT RENTOI
°/y & Economic Development fearing Examiner Recommendation
LUAlS-000736, ECF, SA-H, CU-A
Report of December 8, 2015 Page 23 of 30
Met (a) The pedestrian-oriented space shall be provided according to the following
formula: 1% of the site area+ 1% of the gross building area, at minimum.
N/A
N/A
N/A
(b) The pedestrian-oriented space shall include all of the following:
i. Visual and pedestrian access (including barrier-free access) to the abutting
structures from the public right-of-way or a nonvehicular courtyard; and
ii. Paved walking surfaces of either concrete or approved unit paving; and
iii. On-site or building-mounted lighting providing at least four (4) foot-candles
(average) on the ground; and
iv. At least three (3) lineal feet of seating area (bench, ledge, etc.) or one
individual seat per sixty (60) square feet of plaza area or open space.
(c) The following areas shall not count as pedestrian-oriented space:
i. The minimum required walkway. However, where walkways are widened or
enhanced beyond minimum requirements, the area may count as pedestrian-
oriented space if the Administrator determines such space meets the
definition of pedestrian-oriented space.
ii. Areas that abut landscaped parking lots, chain link fences, blank walls,
and/or dumpsters or service areas.
(d) Outdoor storage (shopping carts, potting soil bags, firewood, etc.) is prohibited
within pedestrian-oriented space.
Staff Comment: A total of S4,000 square feet of gross floor area is proposed.
Therefore a pedestrian oriented space is required. The proposed development
includes approximately 1,575 square feet of pedestrian-oriented exterior recreation
areas and common open space within the courtyard far resident use and
approximately 1,000 square feet of landscaped camman open space along the
pedestrian approaches to the building entrances. These recreation and common open
spaces are proposed to be provided with concrete paths, path lighting and seating
areas. Additional detailing and specifications are required in order to demonstrate
compliance. See discussion under Building Entries and Ground Level Details be/aw.
Standard: Public plazas shall be provided at intersections identified in the Commercial
Arterial Zone Public Plaza Locations Map:
Standard: The plaza shall measure no less than one thousand (1,000) square feet with
a minimum dimension of twenty feet (20') on one side abutting the sidewalk.
Standard: The public plaza must be landscaped consistent with RMC 4-4-070,
including at minimum street trees, decorative paving, pedestrian-scaled lighting, and
seating.
5. BUILDING ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN:
Intent: To encourage building design that is unique and urban in character, comfortable on a human
scale, and uses appropriate building materials that are suitable for the Pacific Northwest climate. To
discourage franchise retail architecture.
a. Building Character and Massing:
Intent: To ensure that buildings are not bland and visually appear to be at a human scale; and ensure
that all sides of a building, that can be seen by the public, are visually interesting.
HEX Report
City of Renton Department of Com
MISSION HEALTHCARE AT RENTOI
·ty & Economic Development /earing Examiner Recommendation
WA15-DDD736, ECF, SA-H, CU-A
Report of December 8, 2015 Page 24 of 30
Guidelines: Building facades shall be modulated and/or articulated to reduce the apparent size of
buildings, break up long blank walls, add visual interest, and enhance the character of the
neighborhood. Articulation, modulation, and their intervals should create a sense of scale important
to residential buildings.
Standard: All building facades shall include modulation or articulation at intervals of
no more than forty feet (40').
Staff Comment: The proposed structure provides building articulation at least 2 feet
deep, 8 feet wide and 16 feet high of varying width and depth at maximum intervals
of 40 feet, to reduce the bulk and scale of the building.
Standard: Modulations shall be a minimum of two feet (2') deep, sixteen feet (16') in
height, and eight feet (8') in width.
Staff Comment: See discussion above.
Standard: Buildings greater than one hundred sixty feet (160') in length shall provide
a variety of modulations and articulations to reduce the apparent bulk and scale of
the facade; or provide an additional special feature such as a clock tower, courtyard,
fountain, or public gathering area.
Staff Comment: See discussion above.
b. Ground-Level Details:
Intent: To ensure that buildings are visually interesting and reinforce the intended human-scale
character of the pedestrian environment; and ensure that all sides of a building within near or distant
public view have visual interest.
Guidelines: The use of material variations such as colors, brick, shingles, stucco, and horizontal wood
siding is encouraged. The primary building entrance should be made visibly prominent by
incorporating architectural features such as a facade overhang, trellis, large entry doors, and/or
ornamental lighting (illustration below). Detail features should also be used, to include things such as
decorative entry paving, street furniture (benches, etc.), and/or public art.
Compliant if
Condition of
Approval is Met
HEX Report
Standard: Human-scaled elements such as a lighting fixture, trellis, or other landscape
feature shall be provided along the facade's ground floor.
Staff Comment: The proposed building includes transparent windows and doors
between 4 feet and 8 feet above the ground floar level along that portion of the
facades which have relationships to the public street frontage. While the applicant
has incorporated design elements to reduce the apparent bulk of the building,
additional elements should be incorparoted into the design in order to break the
monotony of the street facing fa,odes and comply with the intent of this standard
(Exhibit 12). The applicant has not proposed human-scaled elements such as lighting
fixtures, trellises, or other architectural features along the majority of the building's
northern or western fa,ades (Exhibit 4). Additionally, the proposal does not comply
with the following ground-level detail standards for glazing and untreated blank walls.
The western and northern fa,ades need additional human scale elements in order to
reinforce a pedestrian oriented development.
Architectural detailing elements including lighting fixtures, contrasting materials, or
special detailing would bring the proposal into compliance with the intent of this
standard to create human-scale character of the pedestrian environment. Therefore,
staff recommends as a condition of approval, the applicant to submit revised
elevations depicting added architectural detailing elements including lighting fixtures,
City of Renton Department of Comm · , & Economic Development
MISSION HEALTHCARE AT RENTON
earing Examiner Recommendation
LUAlS-000736, ECF, SA-H, CU-A
Report of December 8, 2015 Page 25 of 30
contrasting materials, or special detailing along the northern and western facades
(amenities such as outdoor group seating, benches, transit shelters, fountains, and
public art shall be provided). The revised elevations shall be submitted to and
approved by the Current Planning Project Manager prior to building permit approval.
If this condition of approval is met the proposal would satisfy this and severol other
standards outline within staff's recommendation.
Standard: On any facade visible to the public, transparent windows and/or doors are
Compliant if required to comprise at least 50 percent of the portion of the ground floor facade
Condition of that is between 4 feet and 8 feet above ground (as measured on the true elevation). Approval is Met
Stott Comment: See discussion above.
Standard: Upper portions of building facades shall have clear windows with visibility
,/' into and out of the building. However, screening may be applied to provide shade and
energy efficiency. The minimum amount of light transmittance for windows shall be
50 percent.
N/A
Standard: Display windows shall be designed for frequent change of merchandise,
rather than permanent displays.
,/' Standard: Where windows or storefronts occur, they must principally contain clear
glazing.
,/' Standard: Tinted and dark glass, highly reflective (mirror-type) glass and film are
prohibited.
Standard: Untreated blank walls visible from public streets, sidewalks, or interior
pedestrian pathways are prohibited. A wall (including building facades and retaining
walls) is considered a blank wall if:
Compliant if (a) It is a ground floor wall or portion of a ground floor wall over 6 feet in
Condition of height, has a horizontal length greater than 15 feet, and does not include a
Approval is window, door, building modulation or other architectural detailing; or
Met (b) Any portion of a ground floor wall has a surface area of 400 square feet or
greater and does not include a window, door, building modulation or other
architectural detailing.
Sta{{ Comment: See discussion above.
Standard: If blank walls are required or unavoidable, blank walls shall be treated with
one or more of the following:
(a) A planting bed at least five feet in width containing trees, shrubs,
evergreen ground cover, or vines adjacent to the blank wall;
Compliant if (b) Trellis or other vine supports with evergreen climbing vines; Condition of
Approval is (c) Architectural detailing such as reveals, contrasting materials, or other
Met special detailing that meets the intent of this standard;
(d) Artwork, such as bas-relief sculpture, mural, or similar; or
(e) Seating area with special paving and seasonal planting.
Stott Comment: See discussion above.
c. Building Roof Lines:
Intent: To ensure that roof forms provide distinctive profiles and interest consistent with an urban
HEX Report
City of Renton Deportment of Cami
MISSION HEALTHCARE AT RENTOI
·ty & Economic Development rearing Examiner Recommendation
WA15-000736, ECF, SA-H, CU-A
Report of December 8, 2015 Page 26 of 30
project and contribute to the visual continuity of the district.
Guidelines: Building roof lines shall be varied and include architectural elements to add visual interest
to the building.
Standard: Buildings shall use at least one of the following elements to create varied
and interesting roof profiles:
(a) Extended parapets;
(b) Feature elements projecting above parapets;
(c) Projected cornices;
(d) Pitched or sloped roofs
(e) Buildings containing predominantly residential uses shall have pitched
roofs with a minimum slope of one to four (1:4) and shall have dormers or
interesting roof forms that break up the massiveness of an uninterrupted
sloping roof.
Staff Comment: The proposed building roofline incorporates a combination of 4:12
minimum pitched roof surfaces and parapets with projected cornices. Roof-mounted
mechanical equipment is located behind pitched mansard roof forms in order to
prevent visibility from the street.
d, Building Materials:
Intent: To ensure high standards of quality and effective maintenance over time; encourage the use
of materials that reduce the visual bulk of large buildings; and encourage the use of materials that add
visual interest to the neighborhood.
Guidelines: Building materials are an important and integral part of the architectural design of a
building that is attractive and of high quality. Material variation shall be used to create visual appeal
and eliminate monotony of facades. This shall occur on all facades in a consistent manner. High
quality materials shall be used. If materials like concrete or block walls are used they shall be
enhanced to create variation and enhance their visual appeal.
HEX Report
Compliant if
Condition of
Approval is
Met
Standard: All sides of buildings visible from a street, pathway, parking area, or open
space shall be finished on all sides with the same building materials, detailing, and
color scheme, or if different, with materials of the same quality.
Staff Comment: The proposed building would use o combination of fiber-cement
siding in three different patterns, stone, and cement plaster finishes on o/1 sides, with
prominent trim banding, and standing-seam metal roofing.
Standard: All buildings shall use material variations such as colors, brick or metal
banding, patterns or textural changes.
Standard: Materials, individually or in combination, shall have texture, pattern, and
be detailed on all visible facades.
Standard: Materials shall be durable, high quality, and consistent with more
traditional urban development, such as brick, integrally colored concrete masonry,
pre-finished metal, stone, steel, glass and cast-in-place concrete.
Staff Comment: In order to ensure that quality materials are used staff recommends
the applicant submit a materials board subject to the approval af the Current Planning
Project Manager prior to building permit approval. Acceptable materials include a
combination of brick, integrally colored concrete masonry, pre-finished metal, stone,
City of Renton Department of Comm · y & Economic Development · ·earing Examiner Recommendation
WA15-000736, ECF, SA-H, CU-A MISSION HEALTHCARE AT RENTON
Report of December 8, 2015 Page 27 of 30
steel, glass, cast-in-place concrete, ar other high quality material. If this condition of
approval is met the proposal would satisfy this standard.
N/A
Standard: If concrete is used, walls shall be enhanced by techniques such as texturing,
reveals, and/or coloring with a concrete coating or admixture.
Standard: If concrete block walls are used, they shall be enhanced with integral color,
N/A textured blocks and colored mortar, decorative bond pattern and/or shall incorporate
other masonry materials.
6. SIGNAGE: In addition to the City's standard sign regulations, developments within Urban Design
Districts C and D are also subject to the additional sign restrictions found in RMC 4-4-lOOG, urban
design sign area regulations. Modifications to the standard requirements found in RMC 4-4-lOOG are
possible for those proposals that can comply with the Design District criteria found in RMC 4-3-lOOF,
Modification of Minimum Standards. For proposals unable to meet the modification criteria, a
variance is required.
Standard: Signage shall be an integral part of the design approach to the building.
Staff Comment: A complete sign age package would serve to ensure proposed signage
is in keeping with building's architecture and exterior finishes. Therefore staff
Compliant if recommends, as a condition of approval, the applicant be required to submit a
Condition of conceptual sign package which indicates the approximate location of all exterior
Approval Is Met building signage. Proposed signage shall be compatible with the building's
architecture and exterior finishes and contributes to the character of the development.
The conceptual sign package shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Current
Planning Project Manager prior to sign permit approval.
N/A
Standard: In mixed use and multi-use buildings, signage shall be coordinated with the
overall building design.
N/A Standard: Corporate logos and signs shall be sized appropriately for their location.
Compliant if Standard: Entry signs shall be limited to the name of the larger development.
Condition of
Approval is Met Statf. Comment: See discussion above.
Standard: Alteration of trademarks notwithstanding, corporate signage should not be
N/A garish in color nor overly lit, although creative design, strong accent colors, and
interesting surface materials and lighting techniques are encouraged.
Compliant if Standard: Front-lit, ground-mounted monument signs are the preferred type of
Condition of freestanding sign.
Approval is Met Statf. Comment: See discussion above.
Standard: Blade type signs, proportional to the building facade on which they are
N/A mounted, are encouraged on pedestrian-oriented streets.
Statf. Comment:
Standard: All of the following are prohibited:
a. Pole signs;
Compliant if
Condition of b. Roof signs; and
Approval is Met
c. Back-lit signs with letters or graphics on a plastic sheet (can signs or
illuminated cabinet signs). Exceptions: Back-lit logo signs less than ten (10)
square feet are permitted as area signs with only the individual letters back-lit
HEX Report
City of Renton Department of Com· nity & Economic Development
MISSION HEALTHCARE AT REIVTO,
Hearing Examiner Recommendation
LUA15-000736, ECF, SA-H, CU-A
Report of December 8, 2015 Page 28 of 30
(see illustration, subsection GS of this Section).
Sta[[ Comment: See discussion above.
Standard: Freestanding ground-related monument signs, with the exception of
Compliant if primary entry signs, shall be limited to five feet (S') above finished grade, including
Condition of support structure.
Approval is Met
Staff. Comment: See discussion above.
Standard: Freestanding signs shall include decorative landscaping (ground cover
Compliant if and/or shrubs) to provide seasonal interest in the area surrounding the sign.
Condition of Alternately, signage may incorporate stone, brick, or other decorative materials as
Approval is Met approved by the Director.
Staff. Comment: See discussion above.
6, LIGHTING:
Intent: To ensure safety and security; provide adequate lighting levels in pedestrian areas such as
plazas, pedestrian walkways, parking areas, building entries, and other public places; and increase the
visual attractiveness of the area at all times of the day and night.
Guidelines: Lighting that improves pedestrian safety and also that creates visual interest in the
building and site during the evening hours shall be provided.
Standard: Pedestrian-scale lighting shall be provided at primary and secondary
building entrances. Examples include sconces on building facades, awnings with
down-lighting and decorative street lighting.
Stat[ Comment: The applicant has indicated compliance with the above lighting
standard as well as the twa standards mentioned be/aw, in the submitted design
Compliant if district compliance narrative. However, a lighting plan was nat submitted identifying
Condition of compliance with these standards, as such, staff recommends a condition of approval
Approval is Met that requires the applicant to provide o lighting plan that adequately provides for
public safety without costing excessive glare on adjacent properties; at the time of
building permit review. Pedestrian scale and downlighting shall be used in all cases to
assure safe pedestrian and vehicular movement, unless alternative pedestrian scale
lighting has been approved administratively or is specifically listed as exempt from
provisions located in RMC 4-4-075 Lighting, Exterior On-Site.
Standard: Accent lighting shall also be provided on building facades (such as sconces)
Compliant if and/or to illuminate other key elements of the site such as gateways, specimen trees,
Condition of other significant landscaping, water features, and/or artwork.
Approval is Met
Stat[ Comment: See discussion above.
Standard: Downlighting shall be used in all cases to assure safe pedestrian and
vehicular movement, unless alternative pedestrian scale lighting has been approved
Compliant if administratively or is specifically listed as exempt from provisions located in RMC 4-4-
Condition of 075, lighting, Exterior On-Site (i.e., signage, governmental flags, temporary holiday or
Approval is Met decorative lighting, right-of-way-lighting, etc.).
Stat[ Comment: See discussion above.
HEX Report
City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development
MISSION HEALTHCARE AT RENTO,
Report of December 8, 2015
I 1. CONCLUSIONS:
Hearing Examiner Recommendation
LUA15-000736, ECF, SA-H, CU-A
Page 29 of 30
1. The subject site is located in the Commercial Mixed Use (CMU) Comprehensive Plan designation and
complies with the goals and policies established with this designation if all conditions of approval are
met, see FOF 17.
2. The subject site is located in the Commercial Arterial (CA) zoning designation and complies with the
zoning and development standards established with this designation provided the applicant complies
with City Code and conditions of approval, see FOF 18.
3. The proposal complies with the Urban Design Regulations provided the applicant complies with City
Code and conditions of approval, see FOF 22.
4. The proposal complies with the Critical Areas Regulations provided the applicant complies with City
Code and conditions of approval, see FOF 19.
5. The proposal complies with the Site Plan Review regulations as established by City Code provided all
advisory notes and conditions are complied with, see FOF 20.
6. The proposed convalescent center complies with the Conditional Use Permit regulations as established
by City Code provided all advisory notes and conditions are complied with, see FOF 21.
7. There are adequate public services and facilities to accommodate the proposed development, see FOF
20.
~ J. RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the Mission Health Care Site Plan and Conditional Use Permit, File No. LUA15-
000736, as depicted in Exhibit 2, subject to the following conditions:
1. The applicant shall comply with the mitigation measures issued as part of the Determination of Non-
Significance Mitigated, dated November 2, 2015.
2. The applicant shall revise the landscape plan to include additional interior parking lot landscaping to
break continuous parking aisles and reflect compliance with the retaining wall requirements of the
code. The revised landscape plan shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Current Planning Project
Manager prior to construction permit approval.
3. The applicant shall provide a detailed screening plan identifying the location and screening provided for
surface and roof mounted equipment. The screening plan shall be submitted to, and approved by, the
Current Planning Project Manager prior to building permit approval.
4. The applicant shall be required to revise the site and grading plans in order to comply with the
maximum retaining wall heights. The revised site and grading plans shall be submitted to, and
approved by, the Current Planning Project Manager prior to building permit approval.
5. The applicant shall submit a detailed common open space/plaza plan which includes specifications for
pedestrian amenities that add to the pedestrian experience and the human scale intended for the
development. The plan shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Current Planning Project Manager
prior to building permit approval.
6. The applicant shall submit revised elevations notating proposed materials for the refuse and recycle
enclosure. The enclosure shall be made of masonry, ornamental metal or wood and shall be
compatible the primary materials of the structure. The revised elevations shall be submitted to, and
approved by, the Current Planning Project Manager prior to building permit approval.
HEX Report
City of Renton Department of Comrr ·1ity & Economic Development
MISSION HEALTHCARE AT RENT01
Report of December 8, 2015
Hearing Examiner Recommendation
LUA15-000736, ECF, 5A-H, CU-A
Page 30 of 30
7. The applicant shall submit a revised site plan connecting the interior pedestrian network to SE 174th St
sidewalk. The revised site plan shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Current Planning Project
Manager prior to construction permit approval.
8. The applicant shall revise the site plan to depict a differentiation in materials for all pedestrian
connections within parking areas and/or drive aisles on site. The revised site plan shall be submitted to
and approved by the Current Planning Project Manager prior to building permit approval.
9. The applicant shall submit revised elevations depicting added architectural detailing elements including
lighting fixtures, contrasting materials, or special detailing along the northern and western facades
(amenities such as outdoor group seating, benches, transit shelters, fountains, or public art shall be
provided). The revised elevations shall be submitted to and approved by the Current Planning Project
Manager prior to building permit approval.
10. The applicant shall submit a materials board subject to the approval of the Current Planning Project
Manager prior to building permit approval. Acceptable materials include a combination of brick,
integrally colored concrete masonry, pre-finished metal, stone, steel, glass, cast-in-place concrete, or
other high quality material.
11. The applicant shall be required to submit a conceptual sign package which indicates the approximate
location of all exterior building signage. Proposed signage shall be compatible with the building's
architecture and exterior finishes and contributes to the character of the development. The conceptual
sign package shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Current Planning Project Manager prior to
sign permit approval.
12. The applicant shall provide a lighting plan that adequately provides for public safety without casting
excessive glare on adjacent properties; at the time of building permit review.
HEX Report