Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Will Rogers - Wiley Post Memorial Seaplane Base Master Plan (1978)
CITY C7' a OP INTERIM PERMIT FOR AIRPORT ISSUED BY RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORPORATION Offic 0 , 8t k Room f it '1Yi Renton, Washington 98055 . , „f..: . 7 .,. .• .., ,._,.,.-• . . .. . “ • . . . . d . . • , . ! • ,• •, .. , . . . . • . . . . . .. PERMIT , . . . .. . , . . . .. , . . . ,, . . . . THIS AGREEMENT, made this 24,th day of July, A. D. 1246, by and. . . . . . between RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORPORATION, a corporation created by an . 1 . . . Act of Congress (hereinafter called 'luau) and the CITY OF RENTON, a muni- Cipal corporation of the State of Washington (hereinafter called, the , . I: WITNESSETH: , 1 • 11' _ 1 . . That in consideration of the sum of One Dollar ($1.00) paid bythe 1 , City to RPC, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, and the covenants , . Of the City contained, herein, RFC grants to the City a permit, revocable upon . d 1 Written notice, as hereinafter provided, to use, solely for municipal airport 1 . . .purposes, the landing area and airport site which formerly comprised a part , . 1 Of the Renton plant of Boeing Aircraft Company, Renton, Washington, leased by . . !, . . aid company from RFC and commonly known as Plancor 156, said landing ara, . , ' I and-airport site -being located in the vicinity of City, directly,west of Said i Boeing Aircraft Company's plant site across the waterway of Commercial Water-. . . . , _ . , .• , . . . . . 10,y District No. 2, comprising a tract of land having an area of 160.83 acres , ‘ and bounded on the east by Commercial Waterway District No. 2, on the soUth • k by Dixie Avenue, Renton, on the west by State Highway No. 5 (Rainier Avenue) • ' . and on. the north by the Inner Harbor Line of Lake Washington (said described • . 11 I . II area being. hereinafter called "Airport Site") together with the facilities 1 1 . , ' thereof and certain personal property included in an inventory attached hereto, I . . . . marked Exhibit "A" and made a part hereof, upon the following conditions:i . I • The City releases RFC from any right of action, claim or demand . 1 .. which may accrue to it by reason of loss or damage to any of its property . . '• I: i . .or the property of others brought upon said airport sitend Said City will • . 1 -indemnify RFC, its sWeessors and assigns and save it' harmleas from any and ,all claims, demands, actions, costs and charges, including attorneys' fees, tie which RFC may be subject or which it may have to pay by reason of any .• :, H ' 1 • ',, • h . , . injury to any ,person or property or loss of life or property suffered or ii Sustained by-any person whomsoever while in, upon or about said airport site, I . .. whether such injury or loss arises from the negligence of said. City, or otherwise. 1, 1 .. I I ., ,, • .. • .. 1 • , • ,,,,,, . ; -,..,„„ . . . , 1 P , ---, • . . • , . • '. • • - . 1 , . . . .,,.. ,...---- . •• ,. ., 1:1-, , - ,,- --i „ ,,'‘,' RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORPORATION .1Ff al ' Inventory No. !' 3 Office of::Defense Plants-Engineering Division Page 1 Of (P 4 . ages) LESSEE !I Boeing Ai rcraft Company, Renton Division • PLANCOR 'NO. 156 j ADDRESS Renton, , Washington EQUIP. LOCATION Renton, 1Wzshin,;to, 1 Item DESCRIPTION QUAN. D.P.C.INV-NO. Cond. COST PRICE FO.B. MFGR. (1) (2) (3) (4), (5) • (6) The airport 'sit'e, directly west of the 02 5'7,5,494.01. plant site across Commercial Waterway I No. 2,. comprises a tract of land having an area of 160.83 acres, bounded on the oast by Commercial Waterway No. 2; on . the south by Dixie Avenue, Renton; on . tine, vest by State +'7ig'htvay No. 5 (Rainier Ave a') and ,on the north• by the Inner Th' rbor •L'i:ne of Lake Washington*;tong - As7 further described on 4PR .lal. . i; ' • EXTRA MACHINE ATTACHMENTS • I • . ELECTRIC MOTORS , FRAME SERIAL H.P. R.P.M. A'C' PHASE VOLTS CYCLE NO. NO. D.C. • CONTROLS . . SIZE TYPE DESCRIPTION Note : The following Construction sheds lo- cated on the Airport Site were built on Army funds s a TOTAL COST F.O.B. MANUFACTURE T S PLANT 5x r 7R ,494,ni PROGRAM UNDER WHICH PAID (CONSTRUCTION OR ACQUISITION) ;, 11 Items liste'd'below••are being.shipped on this machine but are not Items listed below are missing from this machine. !I ' shown above. II . 6 Tool ;;sheds on: skids, 13' 5" x 131 5t ,I • 2 Stor ige Shacks on skids 6' 6" x 7' 3"o 1 Storge building on skids 30' x 181 , 4 ,windows, and watchrans'' key ' Signed - station. BAC Equipment Engineering Date ' • Signed R.F.C. Inspection ' -2150 ,I liXhrQi r -A , „ , I 1 . • i II. I 1 The City agrees that in the use of said airport site, its facili- ties and personal: property located thereon, it will comply-with all laws,i , ordinances and other applicable regulations of any and. all duly constituted 1 governmental authorities. • 1 ' III. I The City agrees that: it will not permit or commit waste with re - 1 pact to said airport site, its facilities or personal property located there- on and that.uion the cancellation of this permit, it.will surrender possession 4 1 thereof,to RFC, its successors or assigns, in substantially their present! con- 1 dition, reasonable wear and tear excepted. I I IV. The City agrees to vacate the premises and return the same to RFC 1 within thirty' (30) days after receipt of written notice so to do. Notice! . to the City as herein provided shall be posted by registered mail, addressed I to the City Clerk, Renton, Washington. , V. • 1 1 The City agrees: - 1 (a) To assume all expenses of maintenance of said airport site; 1 its facilities and personal property located thereon; and (b) To pay its prorata share of all taxes and assessments which . 1 may become a lien upon the facilities and/or personal property of said airport ' site or on described airport site itself, it being understood that the City 1 shall not be required to pay'taxes for any period during which it has notlhad. I possession of said property; and f (c) To keep the premises insured against property loss and public 1 1 liability. I I 1 VI. . • 1 ' The City. agrees to maintain all of the facilities and personal ' property shown in. Exhibit "Air in good condition and repair and return thelsame i to RFC, its successors or assigns at the termination of this Permit in sub- i stantialiy their present condition, reasonable and ordinary wear and tear excepted and either replacing. missing items of inventory or accounting therefor at the fair value thereof. I I I VII. . I The City, in consideration of the Permit herein granted, covenants and agrees with RFC, its successors and assigns, that any and all branches, departments and/or agencies of the Government of the United States shall have the right to use the said airport site and facilities thereof in common with the public and there, shall be made available to such branches; departments and/or agencies of the United States Government full rights of ingress and egress by way of the bridge across the waterway of Commercial Waterway District No. 2, which connects the airport site with the apron area o ' the main assembly building ,located on the plant site of the Renton Boeing Aircraft Company. The right of use hereby granted shall be subject to appli- c ble regulations of the Civil Aeronautics Board for the landing and takeoff o'faircraft andshallbe subject to reasonable regulation on the part of the manager of the airport site, to be appointed by the City. EXECUTED by the parties hereto the day and year first above written. RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORPORATION I By / aL ;e._. ichard M. Price, enager attle Loan Agency. I CITY OF RENTON 1 By i0W------"" ./...0-1 ...6.7---L—_rk....-7 Its Acting Mayor. ATTEST: ; ) By l7,0// /( C�'U�J 2',i,,('� 6It-s City Clerk. 1 II • { Y�\ aY 4 a ' • ASSET-PROPERTY RECORD • OF RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORPORATION Office of Defense Plants AN INSTRUMENTALITY Or THE U.S.GOVERNMENT LESSEE: B .EING AIRCRAFT COMPANY Inventory No. (• RFC, ODP attic,Washington ID. P. C. • P.O. No. • Unit Land Dept. • Plancor No 156 Schedule I (a) Program Constr. location Renton Leasenc vi Manufactu er • Initial Use Quotation: fob Final Use Terms: Vendor: • Cat. No. & Date: • • Acct.No. None Serial No. Nene Received item Land PURCHASE INVOICE CERT. l • ORDER NO. NO. NO. DESCRIPTION AMC.UNT I. GENERAL DESCRIPTION The land area acquired by DPC for Plancor 156 consists of two assembled tracts, one devoted • to an aircraft asse: bly plant and the other to an airport. • 1. The plant site comprises a tract of land sit— uated at the south end of Lake. ashinbton, aa— jacent to and in the City of Renton, King Co. Washington, having an area of 93.4 acres, boun.— ed on, the north by the Inner Harbor Line; on the east by property of the Puget Sound Power & Light Co's Shuffelton Plant and Mo. uilliams St. Renton; on the south by Sixth Street, Renton; and on the west by Commercial Waterway No. 2, which is the mouth of the Cedar River. An easement 16' wide and 1,250' long has .peen granted to the hortzern Pacific Railway Co. and the Pacific Coast Railroad Co. jointly for • a spur track. See Paragraph 2 of Section II. 2. The airport site, directly west of the plant �.� � site across Commercial Waterway No. 2, corlpris s a tract of land having an area of 160.83 acres, bounded on the east by Commercial Waterway No. ' 2; on the south by Dixie Avenue, Kenton; on the west by State Highway i\'o. 5 (Rainier Ave.) ' and on the north by the Inner Harbor Line of Lake Washington. An Easement across the site has been granted to the Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. for construction of a tele:,horxe . line underground. See Paragraph 1 of Section 1 II. Standard Commodity Classification 1 1 of 5 Asset—Property Record No... lal ____.—_._ — _ ;4, - __ _— ----—.-------_.. _ _ SSET—PROPERTY ' RECORV . - (Continuation Sheet) PURCHASE I IN\JI,_E {r ER1. - - -- ORDER NO. NJ. NO DESCRIPTION II. SPECIFIC DESCRIPTION 1,. Portions of sections seven (7). and eighteen(18; township twenty-three (23) north, range five ( ) • east, W.M. , and certain shorelands, more :ar- , . ticularly described as follows: - ' . . Beginning at a point on the inner harbor line of Lake Washington as shown upon sheet No. 26i • , of the plat of ''ake Washington Shore Lands Survey 1921, as said plat was filed with the auditor of King County, '.`la.�hington, Sept. 19, 1921, under auditor's file No. 1552504, which • point bears north 35° 00' west 92.62 feet from Lhe angle point in said inner harbor line de- ' si nated "862" on saidplat, and runningt�lencle l'114 S south 35° 00' east, along said inner harbor i �. r M_ • line, 92.62 feet to said angle point; thence �,f. , • east, along said inner harbor line., 403•7Q f et;$ ' `t thence south 13° 53' 28" east924.6Wet; thence south 76° o6' 32" west 50.00 feet; thence south . 13° 53' 28" east 318.15 feet; tnence south 14°, 08' 28" east 3239.00 feet; thence south 15° .4- • 12' 50" east 99.52 feet; thehce south' 18° 16' i 25" east' 100.01 feet; thence south 21° 39' 45". east 100.45 feet;. thence south 24° 31' 35" east 104.68 feet; thence south 28° 13' 20" ' east 100.79 feet; thence south 31° 11' 40" east 100.27 feet; thence south 34° 18' 30" { east 100.02 feet; thence south 37° 14' 05" . ,. east 100.05 feet; thence south 40° 03' 10" east 100.33 feet; thence south 42° 53' 30" r east 130.87 feet; thence south 45° 39' 20" ,• �N', east 101.62 feet to a point on a line which is a production northerly of the east line • of lot twenty-three (23) block four (4) :'' Renton-Real Eetate Co's 1st Addition to Renton! ; thence south 0° 31' 47" west, along said ro- duced line and the east line of lots twenty- , i three (23) and eighteen (18), block four (4) of said plat, 254.62 feet to the intersection of the north line of Dixie Avenue as now located and established with the east line of . lot eighteen (18), block four (4) of the said addition; thence along the north line of ,aid I ' Dixie Avenue, north 88° 34' 43" west 1466.84 feet to the west line of Lake otreet; thence " 47" east, alongsaid west line i I north 0o 31' 10.00 feet; ..hence north 880 34' 43" west, along tze north line of said Dixie Avenue, 225.49 feet to an angle point in said line; , thence north 71° 29' 12" west, along said , . i 14andard Commodity Classification I . 1 ' ocation: R Sheet 2 of 5 Asset Puppet ly Recc,d_ lid. 1 ?SSET—PROPERTY RECORL ` 11I (Continuation Sheet) T PURCHASE 1 IN IC OE CERT. ORDER NO. NO. NO. DESCRIPTION A.�tOUNT !I north line, 152.58 feet, more or less, to the easterly right of way line of Primary State Hi.i- • • way No. 5 as now fixed and established; thence; northerly, along said right of way line, follolw- ing the tangent and curving courses thereof, tp • an intersection t,ith a line wiach is 5 feet south of and parallel to the line between lots seven (7) and eight (8), block eighteen (18), ; of the plat of Bryn Mawr, King County, •Nash., . produced easterly, according to plat thereof • recorded in volume 5 of plats, page 58, record . { of said county; thance .south 88° 27' 28" east, • - along said parallel line, 89.23 feet to a poin which is 540.00 felt west,measured along said parallel line, from the west line of Black _ . River Waterway as shown upon Sheet No. 5 pre- • pared by Udo hesse, Court Commissioner, and filed in King County.Superior Court Cause No. I . 156371; •thence north 5° 16' 51" east 438.90 I - • feet to an intersection with a line which is - 2 feet south of and parallel to the line be- tween lots one (1) and two (2), block seventeen (17), of said plat of Bryn Mawr, produced • easterly, said point of intersection being 520.00 feet west, measured along said parallel; line, of the west line of said waterway; thence north 40° 09' 47" east 188,55 feet; thence north 60.00 feet; thence north 29° 00' 40" west 197.07 feet to a point on a line which is 300 feet north, measured at right angles thereto, of and parallel to the north line of Bowling Street (formerly Emerson Avenue) produced eastl- erly; i.hence south 88° 27' 28" east, along sai •! parallel line, 355.00 feet to the place of be . ginning, containing 160.83 acres, more or less- 2. ALSO, portions of government lots one .(1) and three (3), sectiprr seven (7), said township and range, and of C. H. Adsit's Lake rlashingto Plat, as said plat is recorded in volume 8 of plats, page 79, records of said county, and certain vacated streets, avenues and alleys i said plat, and certain shore lands and vacate Williams Street North, in said shorelands, all described as follows: Begining at the intersection of the north line of Sixth Avenue North and the west line of j Williams Street North, in the City of Renton, Washington, and running thence north 0° 27' webt along the west line ofot said Williams Street North, 192,5.,d O fe;dity Classificatione orth 89° 33' east ' She( 1 3 °t 6 Asset--Property Record. . 1A1 i Ov.r SSET—PROPERTY RECORU (Continuation Sheet) PURCHASE INVC'Ck CT. . - — - •_— ORDER NO. NO N . DESCRIPTION 11.78 feet; thence north 0° 27' west 275.65 •; feet; thence north 42° 39' 32" east 38.65 feet to a point on the northeasterly line of vacate • Williams street North as shown upon Sheet No. . prepared by Udo Hesse, Court Commissioner, and • filed in King county Superior Court Cause No. 156371; thence along said northeasterly line, �. north 42° 30' west 481.76 feet, more or less, ' to an angle point in said northeasterly line; s • thence north 15° 43' 53" west, along the northr C , easterly line of said vacated street, 817.007 • f• . feet to the inner haroor line of Lake rYashing n; thence along said inner haroor line, south 45 t '�'e 45' west 584.705 feet to an angle point in sa' line; thence west, along said inner harbor 1 , 808:111 feet to the easterly line of the righ of way of Corunercial Waterway No. 2; thence . ' :, ; southerly, along the easterly line of said waterway right of way, to its intersection wi the north line of Sixth Avenue North; thence north 89° 28' east, along said north line, 1132.50 feet, more or less, to the point of 1 beginning, containing 93.4 acres, more or le . f v • i .t (Description of. Farcel dest of waterway pre- pared, from survey notes and maps made by H. W. l Rutherford, Civil Engineer; description of parcel east of the waterway prepared from map furnished by Boeing Aircraft Company. No fie • survey has been made of this second parcel. Descriptions do not include any portion of , the harbor area of Lake 4'dashington that may have been leased from the Port of Seattle) ' .,• I Drawing deference: ReBAC 100-13 • i Plant Site $ 112,797.85 Airport Site $ 575.494.01 TOTAL $ b88,291.86 i 1 i i 1 i . Standard Commodity Classification 1 Location: R Sheet 4 of 5 Asset Property Record ' .1.A1 Ov.r AS SET-PROPERTY RECORL' (Continuation Sheet) PURCHASE INVOICE . CER1. D E S C R I P T I O N ORDER NO. • NO NO. —_._ Paid es follows: • etsh.Ad . . 1,236.10 II in469,814.64 ` S.V. #1 - • 45.63 G.R.C. Tern 31 ,508.49 7.7.2-2' 40,445.34 J.V.1-1- 793.75 • J.V.2-4 3,047.00 • . • J.V.2-4- 1,185.00 • - •J.V.2-4- 10,040.00 7.1r.2-4• 5,396.51 • 7.V.2-5- 5,125.00 J.V.2-64 6,856.55 - 7.V.1-0 I 113,591.60 ,?.V.1-1 Credit 793.75 . . 0 688 ,291.86 • 7 • • • f. • I Standard Commodity Classification 'ulna 1 Location R Srcct 5 of 5 Asset- Propclty Record lsl]. • RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORPORATION - renal Inventory No. III Office of Defense Plants-Engineering Division Page 2 Of 24 (pages) LESSEE Boeing Aircraft Company, Renton Division PLANCOR NO. 156 .ADDRESS Renton, Washington EQUIP. LOCATION Per-toil, Wass Item DESCRIPTION QUAN. D.P.C.INV—NO. cond. COST PRICE • F.O.B. MFGR. (1) i (2) _ (3) (4) (5) (6) 1 Land. Improvements, Airport Site-- 02 ;.Estima Dredging and dredge fill from Lake ted) • Washington. Bulkheads: ,Approx. 570 , 624,400.24 lineal ft. , consisting of piles on 61 centers in two rows 141 apart, 4" x 12" planking and protected by riprap. Also clearing and grubbing, excavation, dry fill, rough finish, sub-grading and field drainage. • EXTRA MACHINE ATTACHMENTS Note : ' As further described on APR Schedule No. 1E1 Finished runway elevations: 26.5 to 33 ft. Original elevations : 5 to 50 ft. ELECTRIC MOTORS FRAME SERIAL • H.P. R.P.M. A.C. PHASE VOLTS CYCLE • NO. NO D.C. • • • CONTROLS SIZE TYPE DESCRIPTION • • • Estimated TOTAL COST F.O.B. MANUFACTURETS PLANT• 4r 24, 0O 2 PROGRAM UNDER WHICH PAID (CONSTRUCTION OR ACQUISITION) Construction . • Items listed'below are being shipped on this machine but are not Items listed below are missing from this machine. shown above. Signed BAC Equipment Engineering ' ' Date Signed R.F.C. Inspection R-2150 CONTINUATION D. P. C. INVENTORY NUMBERS FROM COLUMN 4 • � li • • • • • • • I. I i . 1 • Items listed.below are being shipped on this machine but are not Items listed below are missing from this machine. . shown above. • 0. Signed 1 dl BAC Equipment Engineering tl . it Date I • Signed R.F.C. Inspection ASSET-PROPERTY RECORbr' OF RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORPORATION Office of Defense Plants AN INSTRUMENTALITY OF THE U.S.OOVERNMENT LESSEE: B EING AIRCRAFT COMPANY Inventory No. (RFC/ODP attke, Washington D. P.C. P.O.No. Unit Land Improvements Dept. • PiancosNo. 156 Schedule T (b) Program Constr. Location Renton Leasehold • Manufactu r: initial Use . 'Quotation: fob • Final Use Terms: Vendor: See below Cat.No. &Date: • Acct.No. None Serial No. ' one Received Item Lane'. -"proveg^ents ►{JRCHASF INNO10E CERT. DESCRIPTION •• AMOUNT O(tDER m, No. NO. Contra I, LA:TD TI OVA :T` ,. PL.L'T SIT" 46616 Dated Contractor: The Justin Co. 8-8-41 Slab-Contractor : The Puget Sound "r-• dge Cost p = Dredt'ing Co. fixed -- Thy Construction Co. contra t 'fork Included: Dredging end dredge fill from Lake ashington. Grading entire site ^,ith '"vel and pit run send taken from pits near property. Established finished Grade: 27.0 ft. aver- age elevation. Estimated cost " 272,411 .44 • 60005 II. Li": Z,7P1101 )E'TS, AIRPORT SITE Lump - I Contractor: Puget Sound Bridge & Dredging ontrE r Lated 'fork Included: Dredging and dredge fill Lay 19, from Lake -Washington. Bulkheads: Approx. 570 lineal ft. , consisting of' piles on 6' centers in two rows 14' apart, 4" x 12" planking, and protected by riprap. • cost >1.24,413.77 Standard Commodity Classification None 1 i • oe.tion R Sheetl .gf Asset—Property Record No.._ 1S3.--- ISET-PROPERTY RECOk, (Continuation Sheet) PURCHAS , INVOICE C[RT. — ~ ER N• NO. NO. . DESCRIPTION I AMOUNT' Paid as follows: . 7011 28,116.00 7018 32,895.00 , 6004 926.64 .7028 44,710.26 • 7092 8,971.10 7104 8,794.77 124,41 3.77 • • 60004 Contractor: Northwest Construction Co. • Lump s Work included: Clearing and grubbing, ex- contrac cavation, dry fill, rough finish, .sub- dated grading. and field drainage. • ay 19 ^inished runway elevations : 26.5 to 33 ft. Criginal Flevations: 5 to 50 ft. Note: Runway paving not included. • Cost 499,986.47 Paid as follows: 6000 16,403.80 6001 • 5,276.70 6002 4,321.80 6003 524.70 7032 180.00 7043 • 180.00 7127 2,988.00 • 6000 24,907.77 6001 76,633.83 6002 115,758.09 6003 27,308.88 7027 32,206.50 7032 26,644.05 7043 21,950.91 7056 7,897.32 6005 22,845.87 6006 18,18 9.94 6007 16,361.14 6008 6,390.00 6009 5,705.55 7107) 980.14 7109) 6010) 4,500.00 6011) 44 7122 Standard Commodit1Crc8,17e4ion None Loc. ion R Sheet_,$ -of .S° Asset -Property Rccord 1B 1 Ove, lA13 • Y al 13ICOad #c,iadoid--sass/ c Jo 0 v-ayti g uoT1.ao• ®moK �iopo� ss610 X$ O WWOa PJDPU c ,S •�I 1• 1 I • • • • � . . • • • • • • • • • • 99•118`96E R ' $ . odaT p q.us- 1-so0 Pe4.aruPPs;:il T3 .L • fi+2.OOt`tZ9 eq.Ts sod try 00 paq.emTVag. L17•986`66T7 • .OID GT7 L2TL -- — N011JIr7S3a ON N rube irorowv �_. a�� a�iOonN� ON asviorn4 (wogs uouonuquoj COD32! J11213d021d -13SS p • • • 411- RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORPORATION rinal Inventory No. TIT Office of Defense Plants-Engineering Division Page 3 Of d (Pag es) LESSEE Boeing Aircraft Company, Renton Division PLANCOR NO. 156 ' ADDRESS Renton, Washington EQUIP. LOCATION RArton p;Y'po t • Item DESCRIPTION • QUAN. D.P.C. INV—NO. Cond. COST PRICE (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) F:0.(6)FGR. 1 Flight Service Building-One story, wood Schedule 02 4i>32,626.99 frame, office and service building with 3 11(a) story control tower. Over-all dimensions: 70' x 160' ," total floor area 11,042 sq. ft Tonal cubic contents; 150,264 cu. ft. clearance to ceiling; 9' designed floor. • load : 3000 lbs. per sq. ft.. constructed of .all new material, concrete wall footings Foundation, 5" concrete slab floor, frame of wood' studs and joists., Ext. walls of cedar siding on shiplap sheathing. In- Schedule 31:,274.56 eludes Electric Power, Electric Illumina- II(b) Heating P.- Ventilating. Also Airport Antenna System consisting of 6 receiving and. 2 transmitting antennae complete: As described on APR' S-2A8, 2B38,2B39,2B40,2B41 Includes additional bldg. insta11ations and equipment and all other appurtenances contained within the Flight Service Bldg. , ELEC1*1 MAgre6 tu. on ILeui 1. • FRAME SERIAL H.P. R.P.M. A'C' PHASE VOLTS CYCLE NO. NO. D.C. ' III CONTROLS SIZE TYPE DESCRIPTION • • • TOTAL COST F.O.B. MANUFACTURE T S PLANT 6 v,001.555 PROGRAM UNDER WHICH PAID (CONSTRUCTION OR ACQUISITION) Construction • Items listed below are being shipped on this machine but are not Items listed below.are missing from this machine. shown above. II ' Signed BAC Equipment Engineering Date • Signed R.F.C. Inspection R-2150 CONTINUATION D. P. C. INVENTORY NUMBERS FROM COLUMN 4 i - '.I ' I i • ' rl Items listed below are being shipped on this machine but are not Items listed below are missing from this machine. shown above. 1 Signed BAC Equipment Engineering Date Signed 1 R.F.C. Inspection -`SET—PROPERTY RECORD---' < ^� OF J , RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORPORATION Office of Defense Plants AN INSTRUMENTALITY OF THE U.S.GOVERNMENT LESSEE: BOE G AIRCRAFT COMPANY Inventory No. `RFC/ODP Se. le,Washington /D. P.C. Rebac „ 8 P.O.No. See below Unit Fli.ght Service '31dQ. Dept. Plancor No. 56 Schedule II (a) Program Constr. Location Renton, ''ashington Manufacture Initial Use Quotation: fob See below Final Use Terms: Vendor: Various, See below Cat. No. & Dote: Completed Acct. No. %one Serial No. "one vitainuir See below Item Flu aht Service rldg. PURCHASE INVOICE CERT.ORDER NO. NO. NO. DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 70028 FLIGPT SERVIC" Rin as follows: Lump sum Contractor: 77estern Construction Co. contract dated Completed:. Dec. 1944 9-18-43 Type: One story, wood frame, office and service building with 3 story control tower. Size: Over-all dimensions: 70' x 160' Total floor area: 11,042 so. ft. Total cubic contents: 150 ,264 cu. ft. Clearance to ceiling: 9' • Designed floor load : 3000 lhs . per sn. f . Structure: :Il '''ew ''eterial.s Foundation: Concrete wall footings • Floor: 5" concrete slab Frame: 7,;ood studs ens joists Tact. walls: Ceder siding on shiplep sheathing. Int. walls: 3/8 sheetrock or shiplap on studs.. • Roof: Flat coninosition roofing on shipla • •Windows: Continuous wood sash, carpi etel; glazed. Truck doors.: 2 at 9' 6", 1 'at 8'a8" • Special features: • Flight Control Tower: 16 r_ 16' on third floor, standard design, sur- rounded by balcony. Standard Commodity Classification None Lo ce on R Sheet 1 Of 2 Asset—Property Record No. 2.4 q Over 1 1 / 4 !. SETPROPERTY RECORD �' . 4) (Continuation Sheet) PURCHASE INVOICE CERT. DESCRIPTION a` ORDER NO. NO. NO Offices: 11 on ground floor, 1 on second floor of tower. Fire Station: Accomodations for 2 trucks Toilet rooms: 1 women' s, 2 men' s Furnace rooms; 14' x 25' with laminated ; ail s. • Crews dressing room and locker room. • Fan room: On roof; 8' x 12' complete i louvers. Airport Antenna System consisting, of six receiving and two trcnsmittina antenna complete with 7-55' poles, antenna eouipment, obstruc ion lights, insule- • tors, wire and ground. grid. Building Instztlati.ons "Tote: ?'o sprinklers in • this building. Drawing r'o : Dustin A 2 thru L-4. Cost 29,129.25 • • • • Paid as follows: 7022 8,892.00 7023 4,547.25 • 7030 4,356.85 7040 • 5,494.16 7058 • 774.04 7063 515.87 • 7078 684.58 7034 291..97 • 7116 159.61 7130 2,912.92 $ 29,129.25 • . ':on' 'remium on above contract 422.52 Paid as. follows: • 7026 352 .57 7139 69.95 422.52 70059 4445R 7128 9oeing rcraft Company . . 141 .18 70060 4446R 7123 ?"iscellaneous building work performed 132.69 . 70062 4216R 7120 • es follows : 161 .69 70067 4455fl 7128 81.63 70069 5371R 7143 • 2,558 .03 • Total cost " 32,626.99 Standard Commodity Classification none 1 Locat on R Sheet 2 of 2 • Asset-Property Record . 2A g (�Vfl _SET-PROPERTY RECORD..._; OF RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORPORATION Office of Defense Plants AN INSTRUMENTALITY OF THE U.S.GOVERNMENT LESSEE: BOE G AIRCRAFT COMPANY Inventory No. RFC/ODP Se• tle,Washington /D. P. C. Fobs P.O. No. 70023 Unit Tit-ht Service Dept. PlancorNo. 56 Schedule II (b) Program Constr. Location Throw hout `3dg. Manufacturer Initial Use Quotation: fob Contract Final Use Terms: Vendor: ';extern Construction Co. (Contractor) Cat. No. & Date: • J. igutter Co. (Sub-contractor) Compl eted Acct. No. none Serial No. *.'one Dec . 1944 Item Fl ectri c Illuminati on PURCHASE INVOICE CERT.ORDER NO. NO. NO. D E S C R I P T I,O N AMOUNT 70028 EITICTRIC ILLZT Z':^TIC'" ",T SE'- 7.7,2 7 I.' IT"-, Lump sum Electric Illuminetion nstellation including contract • sub-eeders, lighting panels, bunch dated circuits, rnu lighting fixtures. 9-18-43. Interior 1°ghting: Fluroescent fixtures, 120 , general li ghting. 9 with 3 40 watt lamps, 13.'•: reflectors 47 with 2 40 watt lamps, PLI' reflectors ;_verage illnminction, 25 ft. candles Incandescent fixtures, 120 v. 70 various t:oes, 20 to 300 watts. • Obstruction lighting-: 5 obstruction 1i hts, • 120 v, 60 watt incandescent lamps. T.Vti in,~ No: .'ugtin Rr.L 1 Cost n 8 ,3.7 .69 Paid as follows: 7023 227.36 7030 . 1,045.09 7040 1,044.07 • • 7058 1,853.86 7063 1,068 .47 7078 .1,662.30 7084. 225.06 7116 375.11 • 7130 • 833.57 $ 8,335.69 References: 3uilding, Structures: APR #2A 8 Standard Commodity Classification None 1 1 Loc 'ion R Sheet 1 of 3 Asset—Property Record No. 2 E. 73 0 �Z ' SET-PROPERTY RECORC__, ,- k Continuation Sheet) PURCHASE INV N OICE CERT NO.. DESCRIPTION _I f•=u ORDER NO. iilcing Intitall ations: TR '138 thru 41. 'Tote : Including the following instrllations that are readily removable or selvegeebl as units : 9 furoescent fixtures, 'Ton-metallic re- flectors, 3/40 watt lt:trcps, 254 volts, Curtis TTo. 1507-D open end, with High power factor ballast, 3 conductor " cord and t'7ist-lock plug. • © 14.00 126.00 �7 ?+1uorescent fixtures, Mon-metallic reflectors, 2/40 watt lamps, 254 v. , Curtis "o. 1 508, open end, with high power factor ballast, 3 conductor cord and twist-lock plum. O 12.00 564.00 54 RL!' Done Reflector, 'Benjamin 5642, for 150 watt lamps. p 2.80 151.20 16 0les.s Fowl Fixtures, ceiling mounted Graybar ' o. 11077, with Graybar Cat. • ITo. 8880 opal glass 'Fowl. O 2.40 38 .40 • 1 'floodlight, 1000 watt, open t:.'pe Crouse-Hinds Cat. I'o. 43909, medium beam. 0 ;7.40 17.40 • 5 Obstruction lights , Wolophane 2353, 40 watts, 120 volts, O 8.02 40.10 ' 1 Ibtatinp Beacon, Crouse-Hinds Cat. 43039, type DOB-224, Doutl a end,• 1000 watt lems, 120 volts, 6 O 800.00 •800.00 • Sub-total fixtures only v 1,737.10 121 I'luroescent imps, 40 watt, T 12, a,5°00° white © .65 ea. 78.65 Standard Commodity Classification !Tone 1 Loca ion P Sheet 2 of 3 . Asset—PropeltyRecord 2D 38 Over ,.,SET—PROPERTY RECORD (Continuation Sheet) PURCHASE INVOICE CERT. DESCRIPTION • AMOUNT nRDER NO. NO. NO. MI ' 5 Incandescent lamps, 60 watt, 120 v, inside frosted 0 .06 . 30 16 Incandescent lamps, 100 ran tt, 120 v, inside frosted C .09 1.44 54 Incandescent Lamps, 150 watt, 120 v, inside frosted 0 .12 6.48 3 Incandescent lamps, 1000 watt, 250 v, clear, mogul C, 2.85 8.55 Sub-total _'.amps only a 95.42 -Converti fuse panels, '_Trumbull Electric Co 120/240 volts, as follows: • 1 600 amp. main 2 pole, 250 v • 1 P0 amp. branch 2 pole, 250 v 4 100 amp. 2 60 a mp. " n t+ 4 30 amp. spare " " 1 Panel 331.95 1 Panel • with the following circuits 1 100 amp. main • 3 60 amp. branches 1 60 amp. snare • 1 Panel 118.80 Lighti^g panels, Trumbull Electric Co. Type NTP, 3 wire, single phase, 120/ 240 volts, as follows: • 1 32 circuit- • 78.60 • 1 16 " 51.60 1 - 20 " , with 84.00 size 3 contactor. Sub-total panels 664.95 • . • • Total (readily remov- 12,497.47 ables) • • Standard Commodity Classification Pone 1 Loc-!ti on R Sheet 3 of 3 . • Asset—Property-Record 2B 38 . w : A ;ET-PROPERTY RECORD: OF RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORPORATION Office of Defense Plants AN INSTRUMENTALITY OF THE U.S.GOVERNMENT LESSEE: BOE G AIRCRAFT COMPANY Inventor No. RFC/ODP S.• fa,Washington y /D. P.C. Rebac P.O. No. 70028 Unit Flight Service ''wilding Dept. Plancor No. 56 Schedule II (b) Program Constr. Location Throughout Buildinr Manufacture Initial Use Quotation: fob Contract Final Use Terms: Vendor: .estern Construction Co. (Contractor) Cat. No.& Date: 5, 5. gutter Co. (Sub-contractor) Completed Acct. No. none Serial No. ?Tone #itttsiritek Dec. 1944 Item EL ectri c Power PURCHASE INVOICE CERT. DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ORDER NO. NO. NO. 70028 FLECTRIC PC'Tr'_R - 7. Ir'?T SERVICE S[TI.,ra-rG Lump s Electric power installation inclu=ing feeders contract from switchboards, subfeeders and power :.ated distribution panels. 9-18-43 System characteristics: 3 ph, 3 wire, 440 v, power service 1 ph, 3 mire,. 120/240 v, lighting service • Cenacity: 150 KVI Drawing No: Austin EA-2 & 3 Cost 5,875.54 Paid es follows: . 7023 160.27 70'30 737.21 7040 735.93 7058 1,306.72 7063 753.12 7078 1,171.70 ' 7084 158.64 7116 • 264.40 7130 587.55 5,875.54 . • References: Building Structure : 'PR #2A 8 • • Building Instc•ll stions: LPR it`. thru 23 41. Note : Including the following installations Standard Commodity Classification None 1 LO :tion R Sheet 1 of 2 Asset—Property Record No—__2$i$ / .SET-PROPERTY RECORD �J (Continuation Sheet) PURCHASE INVOICE CERT.ORDER NO. NO. NO. DESCRIPTION AMOUNT that are readily removable or salvageable as units: 1 Switchboard, Trumbull Electric Co., centrifuse type, 3 pole, 575 volts, wi;h the following fusible switches. 6 400 amp. branch switch 2 100 asnp. 2 60 amp. " ^ 2 30 amp. ^ " Space for 1-100 amp or 2-60 or 2-30 amp branches. 1 Sritchboard 884.40 • Service panel, Trumbull Electric Co. , Type TP, 3 wire, 120/240 volt. 4-30 amp plug fuses. • 1 Panel 22.80 1 Contactor, G.E. Company, Type 2811-05F• 208/220 volts, 125 amps. • 56.70 • • • Total t 963.90 • • • • • • Standard Commodity Classification Tftae • 1 Loch ion, R Sheet 2 of 2 • Asset--Property-Record 2B 39 'SET-PROPERTY RECORD, -A- -� OF �l RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORPORATION Office of Defense Plants AN INSTRUMENTALITY OF THE U.S.GOVERNMENT LESSEE: BO: NG AIRCRAFT COMPANY Inventor No. S RFC/ODP Se ttle,Washington y ID. P.C. RODE c �^ P.O. No. 70028 Unit 71.1 crht Service '1c7 Dept. PlancorNo. 56 Schedule II (11) Program Constr. Location Throughout ttTilding. Manufacture : Initial Use Quotation: fob Contrt et Final Use Terms: Vendor: ';;rest ern Construction CO. (Contractor) Cat. No.& Date: .ectrol oil 'ktrner Corp.., (Sub-Contractor) Com+leted No. one+ Serial No. one' ilittltf.tiVillk rec. 19t'--4 Item TTestinr- Thntilct in - PURCHASE INVOICE CERT. DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ORDER NO. NO. NO. 1—)mT..n D` TT,.^.,. — i I' -T S`T,*PTTi 77 '"T'TL 7 r • s T•pe: I. forced hot air system ccx^pletc i,th contra c I _ furnace, oil birner, filter, ^_, etc., e.ted designed to provide six (6) air cb nyes J-18-43 per hour. Yurnace: Tubul nr ell steel, forced circul stio , oil fired, hot air type with rating of 60n,000 TPTTT per hour output. Supply System: `'ot ri r supply .ducts to all • roams thru filter unit end fan. Ethaust Systems; Recirculctin.7 Systen: Ducts from all off° ces to furnace. rirect exheust system: Tucts from toilet and locker rooms thru 7600 C ': 'r=n i n penthouse. • Fuel sunray• 14 barrel cape city trank tunder- rround. DrFit7i 1& 1 O: Tustin ' -:-1 • . Cost Ix 5,1Az .70 • Peid as follows : • 7030 2,277.00 7040 1 ,886.80 7058 - 370.12 7116 92.53 7130 514.05 5 149,50 Standard Commodity classification Tone ' 1 Lo 4 tion R Sheet 1 o f Asset-Property Record No._ 2 * 1 ' lET-PROPERTY RECORD r (Continuation Sheet) �" PURCHASE INVOICE CERT. DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ORDER NO. NO. NO. References: ki•ldinn Structure : APR ruildinu Installations: r.PR #27338 thru 41. Note: Including the following instnlletione that are readily remov-bl.e or salvageable es units: 1 Purnoce, Casper &. Cutler, hot sir, oil fired, forced circulation, ell sheet steel rating of 600,000 ''T(; per hour, complete with humidifier and steel smoke pipe. t 1,200.00 1 Oil -kirner, 33 ectrol ^urner Oil Corp. , automatic, Arun type. 100.00 1 Tlzel oil tank, steel construction, 14 barren cepecity. 70.0C • • 1 Fan, Western =1oT7er Co., unit type, sr,belt drive, cape.city 4,000 CT':, compl ete with. 3/4 hp, • 1WA volt, •1 phese, 60 cycle motor. • 150.00 • 1 rcn, :7estern "J.o" r Co., 3 1/2, capacity of ?WO C717, 01 1/4" S.P.,. complete with 3 hp, 440 volt, 3 These, 6C cycle motor and IT-belt drive. • 225.00 Totel (readily removebles) 1,745.00 .• . Standard Commodity Classification '"on• ' Loc' ion P. Sheet 2 of 2 Asset--Property_Record 27 40 rT-PROPERTY RECORD , OF RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORPORATION Office of Defense Plants AN INSTRUMENTALITY OF THE U.S.GOVERNMENT LESSEE: BOE G AIRCRAFT COMPANY Inventory No. (RFC-ODP Se• le,Washington )D. P.C. Pebr:c P.O. No. 7002E Unit Flight Service ui.lding Dept. PlancorNo. • 6 Schedule II (b) Program Const. Location Throuci,out T ilc'inp Manufacturer Initial Use Quotation: fob Contract Final Use Terms: Vendor: extern Construction Co. (Contr._ ctor) Cat. No.&Date: TT'ii,versity P1'snbing g Heating\Co. (Sub-co-ntr ctor) Acct. No. :one Serial No. 'one Waged m . -. Dec. 19/1 Plumbi •• PURCHASE INVOICE CERT.ORDER NO NO NO. DESCRIPTION AMOUNT . 70028 PLL }3INr' - :LI^.•HT "F RI I^.H -1T1L' Lump sun Of standard war-time desiri rnd ricterials, contract this in-tE-11: tion incluces the follon:in• doted 9-13-a3 Cold rater supply system from connectio, s • to plant water mains to fixtures. The following fixtures, their vents and wastes to connections into domest'.• sewer loon to City of Renton trunk sewer. 11 Toilets 6 T'rinels 7 Lavatories 2 Drinking.fountr.ins 1 Sink • • 1 Service Sink 1 ^!ash "ountain (10 capacity) The following drains and their connect- ions into domestic serer loops : • 6 Roof 3 Loor • • Tile following ec• ipment enra their onne - • tions. 1 60 gt-1. electric hot veter tank • • 2 Fire hose reels • ^rac-inrr ITo: ustin A-2 Standard Commodity Classification --one ' ipe at •n R Sheet 1 of 3 Asset-Property Record No.._237. •? `' ? ,ET-PROPERTY RECOR (Continuation Sheet) PURCHASE INVOICE CERT. DESCRIPTION ORDER NO. NO. NO. Cost ^ 11,922.83 Paid as follows : 7022 161 .95 7030 3,886.71 7040 2,024.33 7063 208.86 7078 3,769.10 7084 418.78 7116 260.82 7130 1,192.29 $ 11,92 .83 Note: Above total includes an estimated cost of $966.00 to cover compressed air instal- lation. See APR #203, sheet 2. References: Building Structure: APR #2A 8 Building Installations: APR #2B38 thru 41. • Note: Including the following installations that are readily removable or salvageable as units: .6 Urinals, American Radiator and Stand- • ard Sanitary flnrp., No. F6281 , "Tiering", wall type, complete with flush valve • and fittings. • : 15.00 90.00 6 Lavatories, American Radiator End Stan- dard Sanitary Corp., To. F398, "Hood", • oval bowl, 1S" x 15 1/2", cast--in soap dish. Complete with chain, stopper and fittings. C 17.55 105.30 1 Service Sink, krtericas Radiator End Stan- dard Sanitary Corp., 'do. 7650, "ArdmoreW vitreous china, 20" x 16" complete with fittings. a 25.00 25.00 1 Sink, American Radiator and Standard Sanitary Corp., No. F7223, flat rim • type, 30" x 18", complete with fittings. 0 10.50 10.50 2 Drinking Fountains, American Radiator Standard Commodity Classification Nene Los :tion R Sheet 2 of 3 • Asset—Property Record 2B 41 Ovc lit:) 'ET-PROPERTY RECORD (Continuation Sheet) PURCHASE INVOICE CERT. DESCRIPTION ORDER NO. NO. NO. -_,- and Standard Sanitary Corp. , No. 8364, "Floric", wall type, side bubbler, com- plete with fitting. 35.00 1 77ash Fountain, Bradley rash Fountain Co., 54" size, "Bradstone", complete with fittings. 2150.00 150.00 11 Closets, American Radiator and Standard Sanitary Corp., No. F2469, complete with flush valve and fittings. 0 _Fn a v 247.50 1 Lavatory, Crane Co. , square bowl, 20" • x 18", 3/8" supply, 1 1/4" outlet, complete with fittings. 17.50 17.50 • Total (readily removables)A 680.80 • • • • • • • • • Standard Commodity Classification None • Loc tion R Sheet 3 of 3 • Asset Property-Record • -. EB 41 „ • • • • • RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORPORATION renal Inventory No. TTT • Office of Defense Plants-Engineering Division Page A Of_ (Pages) LESSEE Boeing Aircraft Company, Renton Division PLANCOR NO. . I56 ADDRESS Renton, Washington EQUIP. LOCATION R,Fcrtte.Yil. Airport • Item DESCRIPTION QUAN. D.P.C. INV--NO. Cond. COST PRICE F.O.B. MFGR. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) 1 Guard House-Airport-One story wood frame 02 • building constructed. of all new material. 04 Foundation consists .of concrete wall _bermes; floor is 4" concrete slab; exterior walls of plywood, siding . or transit() 'on shiplap; interior walls of plywood, gypsum board or sheet-rock on studs; roof flat composition roofing on sheathing, wood sash completely glazed windows. Electric illumination installations include sub • - feeders, lighting panels, branch circuits, and lighting fixtures. Electric power CTRAM;4 h "AI` AfC ,t� rola Flight Se2,.vic:e Bldg. nJ nn.thni1nr.A.rtn I A.AA with. capecity of 15 KVA. Heated by portable electric heater. Plumbing fix- tures include 1 toilet, 1 lavatory, and 1 hot water heater. • Note : As further described on A.P.R' s- 2.A9, 21342, 21343, 2)44 21345. 0.0560.30 Guard. House-Schedule TTA, Bldg. Install. Sch.eple IIB • _ 3,000.00 ELECTRIC MOTORS FRAME SERIAL H.P. R.P.M. A.G. VOLTS CYCLE NO. NO. D.C. • CONTROLS ' SIZE .TYPE DESCRIPTION • • TOTAL COST F.O.B. MANUFACTURE r S PLANT " , 60. 30 PROGRAM UNDER. WHICH PAID (CONSTRUCTION OR ACQUISITION) construction Items listed below are being shipped on this machine but are not Items listed below are missing from this machine. shown above. • • Signed BAC Equipment Engineering , • Date Signed • R.F.C. Inspection R-2150 CONTINUATION D. P. C. INVENTORY NUMBERS FROM COLUMN 4 II • • • • • • • I , • I 1 I' • • • • • Items listed below are being shipped on this machine but are not Items listed below are missing from this machine. shown above. it 1. Signed BAD Equipment Engineering ' 1 ' Date Signed ' 1 R.F.C. r ction • • 1 • • .� IIP r SSET-PROPERTY RECORD OF RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORPORATION Office of Defense Plants AN INSTRUMENTALITY OF THE U.S.GOVERNMENT LESSEE: BI EING AIRCRAFT COMPANY Inventory No. (RFC/ODP ` attic,Washington D. P.C. P.O. No. See belc+� Unit "card rouver. Dept. PlancorNo. 156 Schedule TT (A) Program nor 'tr. Location ?an tor., it+F,11 ='ton Monufactu .n AToIIo Initial Use Quotation: fob • Final Use Terms: Vendor: Various, see b-1 Cat. No.&Date: Co!Lpl ete d Acct.No. ::o a Serial No. - 3tEstxed: see belowltem c and Fousel PURCHASE INVOICE CERT.O DER NO. NO. NO. D E f C R I►T I O N AMOUNT #5616 '.�. Deted ' 8-8_41 Contractor: The .'.ustin Co. Cost pl s Completed: tereh 1243 fixed f:e contra c . Type: QLe story, wood frrre, Guard houses. Size: ern11 dimensions; . East pete, 16' x PC" ; 5' x 9' ; '".E., 10' x 16' . Totvl floor tree: 525 sq. ft. Totf1 cubic co-stente : 393? cu. ft. CAili^.r height : 7' 6" erprox. Designed floor load : 1500 lbs. per sq. ft. Structure : A11. *yew 'eterirl lro••nr'ti Of i Onncrete -all 1-,-Fmc Floor: 4" concrete slot, :trine : 'food studs ard. raf.tr,rs Ext. wells : Plyssood, s?c'inr or trans +te on s,inlan. Tnt. walls: Plywood, rnrrF:un 'orr' or eheetrock or. •ituda. Poof ; composition rolfi ne on sbaathiro. Yincows : Steel sash comml etely p1ntzr d �ocinl. ^eetures: Toil Pt rooms : Tr east ^ate Counters: Tn :,t ^vte Standard Commodity Classification none 1 Asset-Property Record La rt,;Qr; i o.» SSET—PROPERTY RECORD (Continuation Sheet) _ PURCHASE INTOICE CERT. DESCRIPTION I ORDER NO. NO. NO. C:.ntilevered cti op:es : 1_.t.. • '.t', and v. V. I r.rr.t. inn '•'amber: I -1 Fast ^,ote, � -2; ". _''.� ring • ,�:,, c- ; . .Estimated cost of building^ not . ineluding building i ,stellrtions awl items readily rennvcble. '`-,t- c, :r 900.00 • , , r ,300.00 t,tirit:.ted total co..'t ! � ` -' k 1 • ,. . + ) �0��:4r`t-rri ' (�. . Linn sum Co'.i -c' , : -tier` -, ..-,'_r - •3trr nd ••• "nns o on trait . _ +od (o• -1 ,4-, . _ .t. 1•1?, - -44 Type : Cie story, wood fre-ae, -sr S. ae : Over,11. diiens ions: 11.' i 1F t - Totr1 'loor rrce: 1?6 moo. ft. Tots 1 cubic oor ter.t.• 1:720 ^u. _'t. C:,11 _rr T-ri .ht : 7' :," eppro=. Do .; Tied floor lorrl : 1500 lbs. per se. f . Stri]r ture: .+11 P:'. :-PtF.riel ro'.rdratior : Concrete -ell �r,e. "loor: 4" concrete -.1.-_h . r- e: •:'ooi studs erd r-t7t^r. ;rxt. •':e11s : Trerxite o^. ..• ipl'.r I I^_t. wrlls: 3,1e'trocr on 't,,%--. moo^; y1.^t, ca.-}resitior. rnnFinrs on ._r. O:"S : 'Ooc s'r' co""t1`;t"1y -1, z C1. I 17neci el t• ^Ps: Toilet roor. L2r,wiu- 11-�it,cr : ker. 1 • ='sti ated cc t of buildir.r,,s not 1 ir.cluding building instrllctions end ' ter-s readily rc'rovehlP. '�,u ,' '-ir,n 1:_",.00 1Dr"' -try tu5e 539.00 Standard Commodity �lassi icat on none ___ 11 Loa �ion Shcet2 al 4 Asset Property Recoil- 2 SSET—PROPERTY RECOV, (Continuation Sheet) _ PURCHASE INVOICE CERT. ORDER NO. NO. NO. DESCRIPTION • ?or huildinr inst• 1.1 Pti or.5 'nd itens readily' reuov ble re."er to iPF No. 2 n42 thru 2'' 45. 1 • • • • I I II 1 I j I E I 1 •' 1 ! 1 Standard Commodity Classification none L t; on Tr Sheet 4 of A5,0 Piopclly F �+ 9 C,i.f SSET-PROPERTY RECORD— OF RECO STRUCTION FINANCE CORPORATION Office of Defense Plants AN INSTRUMENTALITY OF THE U.S.GOVERNMENT LESSEE: Bs ING AIRCRAFT COMPA Y Inventory No. RFC!ODP S •ttle,Washington D. P.C. I?' r P.O. No. See telo'i • ' Unit ".-„Qz.., ^ ,eAs • Dept. Plantar No. 156 Schedule II (b) Program Co^.str. Location --rel.) }cut Manufactu r: ^i or a Initial Use Quotation: fob . Final Use Terms: Vendor: Various, see b .low Cat. No. &Date: Corm1 Pted Acct.No. .''one Serial No. e 1isisehed See belo,- Item 'L'.0:ric rr. ; PURCHASE INVOICE CERT. DESCRIPTION ORDER NO. NO. NO. D E S C R I►T I O N AMOUNT • Contrac MECTI C TLLt'T'!'TIQ I - !AJARD Hots: x616 (East r'•ete, ".'7. and B.E. (Fein P1^rt) Dated 8-8-41 Contractor: Me Austin 0on:pany Cost pl s nub-Contractor: tan S. ?eFenny Correny ' xedf: e cantr_1c . Cat:`pleted: 12irch ' '31ectrtc illumin^tion in.tellstion in- cludinr subfeeders, lighting,paoeln, brrnch circuits end liEating .ixtl.trE . 'Interior lighting: 6 Fluorescent fixtures, 254 v, wit 2/40 watt letups, reflec:ors 2 Incandescent fixtures, 120 v, verious types, 25 to 2)0 7ett 1 aTro g. -r terior lighting: 2 Floodli.gfits , 254 v, 1000 watt incer.denc,nt 1R^Yns. II- Flush recessed 1;ghtin'• unit , Drawing `'umber: 'ustin i'-1 °- 2 I'atim"ted cost ' n00 .0C 20224 Electric I1'•luninetion, "uerd House, S. . ,4t.te (2.:rin Plant) Li.r1p s ' Standard Commodity Classification none contras ' Lo .etipn c,leet 1 of 5 Asset—Property Record No._ _ .I42 __ t ow►) ;F SSET-PROPERTY RECORP~, (Continuation Sheet) PURCHASE INVOICE CERT. • DESCRIPTION ORDER NO NO. NO dated • 6-14-44 Contractor: ^.oerir", Philp k ':trend 'c Sor •Canpl eted: Sept. 145 • • Electric Tilumination includinc suhfeede lighting panels, brt!nch circuits, lighting fixtures. Interior lighting: • -2 Fluorescent fixtures, 254 v., with 2/40 matt lamps, ?E.Y.. reflectors. 1 incandescent fixtures, 120 v, glass bowl. Drawinu ',umber: Tustin, 1 Y1 • Fbtinr ted cost ` 40.00 70028 Electric Tlluminetion. - Nerd 7.7712ses ( ; roor't� Lug s Contractor: lestern Construction Co. contrec dated Ccxrpl eted: December 1944 9-7-4Z Flectri c 'lluminction inetelletion inc ludo sub-feeders, lighting Panels, brerch• circuits, and lightirte fixturpa. Interior lighting: • I 6 incandescent fixtures , 120 v, various sizes and types.. Exterior lighting: 0 • 1 floodlight, 254 v, 1000 watt. ircondescent lama 4 flush recessed lighting units. Drawing 1imber : fustin A-6 Eet:meted cost ( .00 Pai% as follows: 7040. 332.39 ?05R' 567.61 900.00 • 1 stix_1F-ted total cost $• • Standard Commodity Classification cone • e t on �; a Sheet 2 of 5 Asset--Propel ty Record 2, G? ()VIM SSET-PROPERTY RECORD' (Continuation Sheet) PURCHASE INVOICE CERT. ' CEDER NO. NO. NO. DESCRIPTION Note: Including tt-e following installations that are readily removable or salvageable • as units. zest gate, °1, TT,L'. Ncrd T7ouses, • (rein Plant) } • 6 T°luorescent fixtures , MIT, metal re- flectors, 2/40 watt lamps, 254 v, • Curtis ''o. 1540, with hi gb power - factor ballast, 3 conductor cord twist lock plug. • 0 13.22 79.32 1 Box mounted fixture, porcelain pull chain, socket, 'ryant .35 .35 4 Flush recepsed lightin7 unite, s:: le gang, Nheeler #1.863. • 014.00 56.00 71oodlights, 1000 watts, hinged door, medium beam, Crouse-Finds Co. , Cat. ,To. YML 43951 . • 26.40 52.80 1 RL.r.' Dome reflectors, Benjamin, "o. 5642 for 150 watt lamps. o 2.80 2.80 Sub-total, fixtures only 191.27 12 Fluorescent lamps, 40 watt, T 12, 3500° white • .65 ea. 7.80• I I 6 Incandescent lamps, 150 watt, 120 v, inside frosted. © .12 ea. .72 2 Incandescent lamps, 1000 watt, 250 v, clear mogul . ® 2.85 ^.70 • I • Sub total , lamps only 14.22 Lighting panels, 'Trumbull Tiectric Co. , 120/208 v, as follows: I I Standard Commodity Classification none 1 LO•-tiofl R Sheol 3 Of Asset- Property Record 23 42 ' SET-PROPERTY RECORr (Continuation Sheet) PURCHASE INVOICE CERT. ORDER NO NO. NO. DESCRIPTION 1 Type 84?1, 2 wire , si^ale 8 circuits. 4.75 1 T'r a `T"._'C, 4 ^fire, 3 ph'se, y"cir.cuits. 38.40 1 Tyne C4'.T, wire, simple .I se 1 4 circuits. 2.75 Sub-totelli-hting panel 45.90 Total (readily reTnovebles)�21.39 S.W. Guard House (1'.a in Pl ant) 2 "Fluorescent fixtures, ." metal .reflec - tors, 2/40 watt :amps, 954 v, "Curtis, • ro. 1540, with hicb. power factor ballast, . 3 conductor cord cad t:•rist lock plup. 013.22 26.44 1 Mass bowl fixture, ceilinn *sou^ tad, Crayber !To. 11077,• with Crayb.r Oct..� No. 8880, opal rless bowl. • 2.40 2.40 lib-total fixtures only 253.84 4 FluoreGcent lams, 40 watt, T 12, 3500° white. Q .65 2 .60 1 Incandescent larip,. 150 .wre.tt , 120 v, inside frosted. .12 .12 • Sub-total lamps only 2.72 righting Paul, irumhull ra..ectriC Co., 120/208 v, as follons: 1 Type C4'?, 2 wire, si'.rle p'"ese, 8 circuits. 4.75 Sub-total 4.7`• Total (re f d ily rei ovables)$ 36.31 ;irport Standard Commodity Classification none _-- 1 Loc tion Shcc+ 4 of 5 Asset Flcireit, kr_c.. 'f'? SSET-PROPERTY RECOR! __. OF RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORPORATION Office of Defense Plants AN INSTRUMENTALITY OF THE U. S.GOVERNMENT LESSEE: B4 EING AIRCRAFT COMPANY Inventory No, f RFC ODP attle,Washington �(D. P. C. ebe c P.O. No. Yee -'elow Unit ^uarc Houses Dept. rancor No 156 Schedule II (b) . Program owlstr. Location mT,rour•`bout a'ldi' • Monufactu -r: "one Initial Use Quotation: fob Final Use Terms: Vendor: n^r- ou s, se- belo.. Cat. No.&Date: Co+rr1 et ed Acct. No. --one Serial No. t see belowitem ectric Fo-rer _ PURCHASE INVOICE CERT. ORDER NO. NO NO. DESCRIPTION AMOUNT . Contract KLI CTrt;C PCTin - C.UA?tt - ;mot East F616 and ?. .E, (rein Pl ent) rated • 3-8-41 Contractor: The Tustin Co. . Cost pl • Sigh-Contractor: Van S. : cuPnny Co. fixed fe . contract Completed: Farah 1943 ELectrid power ir.stelletior_ incluc'in:. feeders, fran Network in the Assembly aiilding and po' er :iistri ution nerve �. $ysteri cheracteri,tics : 3 ph, 4 wire, 254/440 volts. Caracf ty-: 35 KLV1. J,uto-Trensforraier: 3 K7A to surely 12C v, service. T?rewing 'hire er: "uttin, -1. P- 2. Fhtint:.:ted. coot 20324 f;l.ectric Po er, "u e.r' Trove... , S.'.7. 0ete (, air_ r =:r_t Lump Contractor: 0oerig, P1,i1p ? Strew! - cantrr:c dated Completed: Sept 1945 6-14-44 El ectric Power inst', lation including feeders fry^ of or', i., '..rr""b,,r Ld . Standard Commodity Classification none ' Location R Sheet 1 gwv13 Asset-Property Record No._ 2B 43 SSET-PROPERTY RECOR' (Continuation Sheet) PURCHASE INVOICE CERT. ORDER NO. NO. NO. DESCRIPTION • and power distribution panels. • System characteristics: 3 ph, 4 mire, 254/ 440 volts. Capacity: 35 KVA Auto-Transformer: 3 KVA to supply 120 v, service. Drawing `_?umber: Austin A-" 1 • Estimated cost 50.00 70028 Electric Power, Airport guard House • Lump s I" • Contrector: 77estern Construction Co. contrac ,; . dated Coim1eted: December, 1944 • 9-7-43 Electric power installation including feeders from lirht service building System characteristics: Single phase, • 120/240 volt. • Capacity: 15 KVA :Auto-Transformer: 7 1/2 !<VA • Drawing ^?o: .%ustin L-6 IEstimated cost 350.00 Paid as follows: 7058 153.24 7063 191.76 350.00 Total Fstimeted cost 650.00 References : Building Structure: :FR #2A. Buildinp Tnstrllation: APR j2B42 thru 29 45. Note: Including the following installations that are readily renovt ble or selvaryeable I as units: Standard Commodity Classification none ' ocation R Sheet 2 of 3 Asset Property Record 2E 43 ovi, SSET—PROPERTY RECORL_ ) (Continuation Sheet) nt' MASI 1,0010 (ART n k NC) NO NO. DESCRIPTION • Es^t •741• 9: N.E. (t'ein plant) 1 1 KVA. Luto-Trcnsfor-es.,r, vesting-. houee, Tyne "7 ,,. 254/120.v. 3.2.65 • 1 2 KVA Auto-mrensforner, lecti art- hour,e Typn "'T" 17.90 Sub-to till 30.55 • S ("Alert, r'ete, (Fain VI ant) 1 3 KT:1i. !..uto-Tr ,nraf erne‘r 'louse Type ".T" .0C .Lirport • 1 7 1/2 EVA :.nta-Trerqfor—,r, West- . infhouse, '2ne. "7" 40.00 111-)ts1 (rcdt1y rerev- • ables). 92.1.55 • • • • Standard Commodity Classification —on rsv, • Sheet 3 of :12A. c! ot Isf(( Id vr • M ' - ' SSET-PROPERTY RECORf , OF RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORPORATION Office of Defense Plants AN INSTRUMENTALITY OF THE U.S.GOVERNMENT LESSEE: B. EING AIRCRAFT COMPANY Inventory No. ?RFC/ODP attle, Washington 1D. P.C. Asbac #g P.O. No. See below . Unit Cuerd Houses . Dept. PlancorNo. 156 • Schedule II (b) .Program Constr. Location Throughout 'Building Manufactu r: None Initial Use Quotation: fob • Final Use Terms: Vendor: Various, See below Cat. No.&Date: Completed Acct. No. None Serial No. *Tone Roclitri. see below Item Plumbing PURCHASE INVOICE CERT. DESCRIPTION ORDER NO. NO. NO. O E S C R I /T I O N AMOUNT Contrac PLUMBING - GUARD.HOt►SES, East Gate, -.E. & N. 7. . #5616 , (''ain Plant) • Dated g-6-41 Contractor: The Tustin Co. • Cost pl = Sub-Contractor: W. E. Esggs Co. fixed - contrac Completed: March 1943 Of standcrd prewar design end materials this installation includes t'-e fallowing: Cold water supply systems from domestic distribution loops to fixtures. The following fixtures, their vents and wastes to connections into domestic sewer loops: 1 Toilet 1 Lavatory 1 Drinking fountain The following drains and their connection. into domestic sewer loops: 1 Roof 1 Floor The connections to the following equipmen' 1 Hot water Heater Drawing Number: East Gate, H-2, N.E. and N.'.`'. 71-1 • Standard Commodity Classification NCne ' location R Sheet 1 Of 4 Asset-Property Record No._ . 2B45 (or..) . SSET-PROPERTY RECOR: f, . • (Continuation Sheet) PURCHASE INVOICE CERT.ORDER NO. NO. NO. DESCRIPTION AMOUNT • • Estimated cost ' $ 800.00 20324 • Plumbing - S.W. Guard House (rain Plant) Lump su#i Contractor: Goerig, Philp & Strand & Son$ contract dated Completed: Sept, 1945 6-14-44 Of standard prewar design end materials, • this installation includes the • following: Cold water supply system from .omest c distribution loops to fixtures. The .followins fixtures, their vents and r;astes to connections into domes- tic sewer loops: 1 Toilet 1 Lavatory • The following drains and their con- • nections into domestic sewer loops: 1 Roof 1 21oor Drawing Number: hnstin, "stun-tad cost A 150.00 70028 Plumbing - Guard House, (_irport) Ltd Contractor: 'Western Construction Co. contra t date& Completed: December 1944 5-7-43 Of standard prewar design and materials, this installation includes the following: Cold cater supply systems from domestic distribution loons to fixtures. The following fixtures, their vents and castes to connections into domestic sewer loops. Standard Commodity Classification None ILocation R Sheet 2 of 4 Asset Prcpeit 23 45 • +SSET—PROPERTY RECORD • (Continuation Sheet) PURCHASE INVOICE CERT. ORDER NO. NO. NO. ' DESCRIPTION I !• 1 Toilet 1 Lavatory The connections to the following equipment: • 1 Hot water heater. Drawing Number: A-6 Estimated cost r, 1,300.00 • Paid as follows: 7116 843.97 7130 456.03 1300.00 Total Estimated cost 2,250.00 References: Building Structure : APR ¢/2b9 Building Installations: !PR. it B42 thru 2315. 'Tote : Including the following installations that are readily removable or salvageable • as units : Iazerd Houses (East gate, ?. NICE.)!lain Plant 1 Drinking fountain, :merican Radial- tor and Standard Sanitary Corp., -,To. B5355, "Neo-Toric", wall • type, 3/8" supply, 1 1/4" out- • 1 et. Corral ate with side bubbl er and fittings . 37.62 1 Lavatory, American Radi ator and Standard Sanitary Corp. , ..0. P3869M, "Hexagon", 20" x 18", 3/8" supply, 1 1/4" outlet. Complete with fittings. 14.81 1 Closet, l.merican Radiator end Standard Sanitary Corp., No. T21816,, " odernus" vitreous china. Standard Commoch -CTosifi o „th fittings. 18.72 1 Lo atidn R Sheet 3 of 4 Asset- Property Record - 2B45 SSET-PROPERTY RECOR. • (Continuation Sheet) PURCHASE INVOICE CERT. D E S C R I P 1 1 0 N t'ORDER NO. NO. NO. "' �I 9 Sub-total 71.15 Guard Houses, S.W. Gate (Main Plant) 1 Lavatory, ..meri can Radiator and Ste:xiard Sanitary Corp., Ho. • • P38691."., "1 exaron", 20" x 13", 3/8" supply, 1 1/4" outlet. Complete vd th fitting 14.81 I • • 1 Closet, Anerican Rrdiator end Stan- dard Sanitary Corp., 'to. F2186, " odernus", vitreous china. Complete rith tank and fittings. 18.72 Sub—total 33.53 • Guard ='buses, (Airport) 1 Lavator:•, A erican Radi ator and Standard Sanitary Corp., 'To. P3869M, "Hexagon", 2C" x 18", 3/8" supply 1 1/4" outlet. Complete ^pith fittings. 14.81 1 Closet, :merican Radiator and Stem- . dard Sanitary Corp. , Ho. 72186, • ":'o9ernus", vitreous china. Complete with tank end fittings. 18.72 • Sub-tote]. (Ai.rport) 33.53 To tal (readily removable)3 138.21 • Standard Commodity Classification None � L•cvtion R Sheet 4 of 4 Asset- Property Record._ 2B45 RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORF'w ATION rinal Inventory No. III Office of Defense Plants-Engineering Division Page ' 5 Of 24 (Pages) LESSEE Boeing Aircraft Company, Renton Division PLANCOR NO. 156 ADDRESS_ Renton, Washington EQUIP. LOCATION 1Rnrai nn Ai rnort Item DESCRIPTION QUAN. D.P.C. INV—NO. Cond. SST PRICE F.O.B. MFGR. (1) (2) (3) (4) • (5) j (6) 1 Ammunition Storage houses-Revetment:- Schedule 02 `;:1,649.00 • 2 one-room. brick storage magazine houses, 1IA ( Estima- 12' x 12' , 100 sq.ft. floor area, 875 ted) cu.ft. contents, ceiling height 8'6" to 91 , i; & ,3000 lbs per sq.ft. designed floor load. Constructed of al]. new materials with concrete foundation, 5" concrete integral floor, 12" solid brick ext. walls; pre- pared roofing on 4" wood deck, .and no windows. No heating, plumbing, or sprink- 300.00 lers in , this building. Elec. ilium. install- Schedule • Estim- ations include lighting panels, branch I11 ted) - '- fi:.tures ?; local E.XT,J.ALfJ 111RE,..", HM vy ,�AJ,1111.d A-411.dilL,P.41.4xJill.Iid: fixtures. • - Note : As further described on APR1S . 2A16 Sc 21391. • ELECTRIC MOTORS FRAME SERIAL H.P. R.P.M. A.C. PHASE VOLTS CYCLE NO. NO. D.C. I CONTROLS • SIZE TYPE DESCRIPTION • • • i; Estimated TOTAL COST F.O.B. MANUFACTURE'S PLANT ,;,•1 �4' .00 PROGRAM UNDER WHICH PAID (CONSTRUCTION OR ACQUISITION) e rn,fitructi on Items listed'below are being shipped on this machine but are not Items listed below are missing from this machine. shown above. • • • • Signed BAG Equipment Engineering ;I Date Signed R.F.C. Inspection R-2150 CONTINUATION D. P. C. INVENTORY NUMBERS FROM COLUMN 4 I - 1 1i 11 III I II , ICI 1 I I I ' I II . � I Ali I ' ' Items listed below are being shipped on this machine but are not Items listed below are missing from this machine. shown above. - .11 I �I III Signed BAC Equipment Engineering Date Signed R.F.C. Inspection ASSET-PROPERTY RECORu OF REC II NSTRUCTION FINANCE CORPORATION Office of Defense Plants AN INSTRUMMTALITY Of THE U.S.GOVERNMENT LtSSF:: B 'SING AIRCRAFT COMP•NY - Inventory No. SRFC;ODP eattie, Washington D. P.C. Rebec #16 P.O.No. 20424 Unit Revetmer t :1Tmnuni ti on Hou Dept. Plon,or N. 156 Schedul II (a) Program Constr. Location ?enton, Washington Manufactu er: Initial Use Quotation: fob Cortrect' Final Use Terms: Vendor: 'Aestsrn. Constru tion Co. (Contractor) Cat. No. & Date: 0orrpl eted Acct.No. '-one Serial No. 'one itaninat Oct. 1945 Item Rove tme:it ppk ur_1.tion • PURCHASE INVoiCL CERT. DESCRIPTION rare AMOUF7TP$ ORDER No No No. LLTTD 3 , 1H L11 1.? t,.�jJ I?�0'� c r.r: contre4t d.2ted T'pe: 2 one room, brick, storage mafazines Z -45 �i zb: 20424 Over-ell d ima en s i on s: 12' x 12' Total floor area: 100 so. ft. Total cubic contents: 875 cu. ft. Ceiling height: 6' 6" to.. 91 Designed floor load: 3000 lbs. per so. f . :truc•ture: .A11 'dew ; ateriels Pop r.dption: Concrete footings Floor: 5" concrete integral th 'ootin : Ext. walls: 12" -o1 id bricks Roof: Prepared roofing on 4" v ooa deck. •fini,ows : -one Funding Thstcl1t ions Note : `To heeting, plumbing, or sprinklers in this building. rre-ing ?'umber: c's3ac 17 x C26 estimated cost of building, no.. i'iclueli hull 'ing install ti.ors and items read it v removable. } Foundation: 350.00 Superstructure 1,299.00 Estimated total cost • 1,649.00 2615 "ote: Portion of total paid tinder ell certf_fi atos 12626 See APR ec 32 I I Standard Commodity Classification one I Loc. tion P Sheet 1 of 2 Asset—Property Record No_ ._ 2 1Fi___- Over SSET-PROPERTY RECORd (Continuation Sheet) INVOICE CERT. I --- DESCRIPTIONHOUf++ tD:F N• NO. NO. • " • 2638 2650 2694 . • 2696 For building installations and items readily removable refer to APR #2R91 . • • • • • • ' t Standard Commodity Classification None Lo ation R Sheet 2 of 2 . Asset—Property Record 2A16 `ASSET-PROPERTY RECORu OF • RECGNSTRUCTION FINANCE CORPORATION Office of Defense Plants AN INSTRUMENTALITY OF THE U.S.GOVERNMENT )1 E: B •EING AIRCRAFT COMP•NY Inventory No. S RFC/ODP eattlo,Washington /D. P.C. Pebec ,i6 P.O. No. 20424 Unit Revetment :atmuni tion t.ouees • Dept. IancorN• 156 Schedul II CO Program Constr. location Throupbout rtr lding • Manufactu er: Initial Use Quotation: fob Contra et • Final Use Terms: Vendor: Western Construe ion Co. (Contractor) Cat. No.& Date: • J. T. Aglitter C. . (sub.-Contractor) Completed Acct.No. ' None Serial No. none ' hisSeigsk Oct. 1945 Item tric rllurJnetion PURCHASE INVOIC` CERT. • ORDER NO NC DESCRIPTION AMOUNT . µ Lump s, 'rLECT2: ALL^.1 :21 - RF.T:5 .'`:T contra t 3T'C'?1AGF. F^"SE, dated +5-45M.ectrie illumirztion installation including li hti- r^Zel?, brz.•nch circuits and. 20424 lisz.` tin' f` xtures and lo.cel switches. • Interior i i F•l. nF : .,j ,.CeAdesccat fixtures 120 v; 2 exml-)siOI proof ?" fixtures with 1o0 ^iatt. ,Note : :11 ririnr is explosion proof. Prnvrini "o: Serse 17 x C 26 "stinated co,:t 1 700.0C 2615 Note: Portion of total pl-id under ell 2626 certifiestee. See APR' PC32. 2638 2650 2 694 .. 2696 I I { ! References: T.ii l'i.n structure : APR 02116 otrt Including the followi*1u instrlletions that ern rendily removrble or salvageable es uhi is: I -'; 2 Explosion proof fixtures, ceiling • t • mounted, 150. watt lamp, Crouse-Finds sett• r?o. I. 1011 417.00 5tarsdard Comrno cl/aRt1`ot Ure8 only 34.00 None Lo "tor. R i Sheet 1 of 2 Asset-Property Record No-. _ 2B 91 (-CSSET-PROPERTY RECORLi (Continuation Sheet) -- — PURCHASE IN coCt. ' c.ERT otit NO NO NO DESCRIPTION t :!) 2 Incandescent lamps, 1:30 wntt, 120 Nr, 1-,sicie frosted G .06 ea. Sub-total Vamps only .12 Total fixtures e: lErips4.12 • • • • • • • • • • • • . . • • • Standard Commodity Classification l'one L tion Sheet 2 ,of 2 Asset- Property Record 23 91 (O'er t • Iiio RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORPORATION Final Inventory No. Office of Defense Plants-Engineering Division Page 6 Of 2A (Pages) LESSEE Boeing Aircraft Company, Renton Division PLANCOR NO. I56 ADDRESS Renton, Washington EQUIP. LOCATION p,,.,L„3), Item DESCRIPTION QUAN. D.P.C.INV—NO. cond. COST PRICE F.O.B. MFGR. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) , (6) 1 Office & Inspection Building-Revetment:- one Schodule 02 s)6,975.00 story wood frame office & shop building, 20' x II(a) (estimated) 64' , 1178 sq. ft. floor area, 9424 cu. ft. content., 8'6" to 9' ceiling height, & 1500 lbs per sq.ft. floor load. Constructed of all nem materials, con- cree, foundation, 4" concrete Slob integral floor, frame of wood studs and 5oi.sts, siding on studs wells, 19 sheetrock on studs int. walls, flat comp. • roof, & windows of wood sash. Divided into 17'x19' office & 19'x32'9" shop, with men's & women's toilets Schedule 2,500.00 between. heated by 2 coal-burning army cannon II(b) (estimated) hookers. Elec. ilium. installations include service , brneh e rcui4- o,, lighting .fify v_.t la`a'6u. EXTWAAEVittLOCATIMIMEO Plumbing of standard war-time design with cold water supply from domestic airport loop to fixtures. Includes 2 toilets, 1 urinal, 2 lavatories, 1 drinking fountain and connections to 1 electric hot water hooter. Note: As further described on APR'S 2A17, n93, 2B92 & 2P94 ELECTRIC MOTORS FRAME SERIAL H.P. R.P.M. 'D A'C' N0. N0. PHASE VOLTS CYCLE .C. CONTROLS SIZE TYPE DESCRIPTION Estimated TOTAL COST F.O.B. MANUFACTURE'S PLANT ran Ar'F ran PROGRAM UNDER WHICH PAID (CONSTRUCTION OR ACQUISITION) Construction Items listed below are being shipped on this machine but are not Items listed below are missing from this machine, shown above. Signed BAC Equipment Engineering Date Signed R.F.C. Inspection I�R2150 r � • CONTINUATION D. P. C. INVENTORY NUMBERS FROM COLUMN 4 • 1' . 1,1 • , • is ! Items listed below are being shipped on this machine but are not Items listed below are missing from this machine. shown above. Signed BAC Equipment Engineering Date k+ Signed14 j A.F.C. Inspection 'ASSET-PROPERTY RECORu OF RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORPORATION • • Office of Defense Plants AN INSTRUMENTALITY.Of THE U.S GOVERNMENT LESSEE: B•EING AIRCRAFT COMPANY InventoryNo. (RFC ODP eattle,Washington (D. P.C. Rebeq• t;•7.7 P.O. No. i C424 Unit Revetment Office E: :nap. ;td• Dept. PlancorN• 156 Schedule II (b) ProgromConstr. LocationThrouah^ut Building • . Manufact er: • Initial Use . Quotation: fob Contract • Final Use Terms: Vendor: 7iestrrn Construction Co. (Contractor) • Cat. No.& Date: Compl eted Acct. No. 'One Serial No. ' 0110 Amtixli Oct . 1945 Item Plumbing PURCHASE INVOICE CERT.ORDER NO NO. DESCRIPTION AMOUNT • Lump PLtt" 1TG-RE i� (�1710E. & 177SP. -jjiit' contr> .t • dated Of standard rer-time cles'_g_i and materials, this installation includes the following: 20424 • Gold water supply from domestic airport loop to fixtures. • . The tailoring fixtures, their•ve;,ts --nd wastes to coiniections into surer: • . 2 Toilets • 1 Urinal 2 Lavatories 1 Drinking fountains •C• • ¶Lbe connections to the followine equir- men t : • 1 M.ectric hot water :heater. Di f pose : Concrete -sea-tit c tank end 500' tile distribution field. mewing: No: ilebec 1? s 749 Ectir'ted cost- 5 1,350.00 ' 2615 Note: Portion of total raid under ill. i ( 2626 certificates. . See APR #2C32 . 263e • 2650 2694 I 2696 jStandard Commodity Classification None 1 hoc tion }; ;heat 1 of 2 Assel--Property Recorn ASSET-PROPERTY RECORD (Continuation Sheet) PURCHASE INVOICF CERT DESCRIPTION ORDER NO. NO. NO. - rit3rerences : u 1dine, Structure : :F:R ;y2117 Building Instr11t tione: _APR #21392 thru • . 94. TTote : Including the following in,tallationa • thet tse readily reroveble or sal ve able as unite: 2 Lavatories, Kohler Co., No. i 2057-CS "rrBPllYIiCtln, eauare:onl, 20" x 18", • 3/3" supply, 1 1/4" outlet, ccmpl ate with chain, stopper end M ttinge. t? 17.t0 35.00 • 2 Closets, Crane Co., ""_dent", coriplete with galvenized el:;ply tank en' fittin s O 27.57 55.14 1 hrinal, Kohl er Co., 019, "Dell eld", compl ete Ti th tank and Pi t•t••n r7s. a d 15.50 15:50 1 -riakin Fount gin; fohler Co. , '3o. ?-53��0-.' , "Cl earbrook", well twp, rectangul ar, 9 1/2" long x 6" wide, side bubbler, canrlete with fittings. • 21.00 1 Water teeter, capacity 30 roll one, • 2000 watts. • 0100.00 100.00 ` • Total (re dily rmnovebles) 1 226.64 • • t I • 1 I Standard Commodity Classification ►\Tone ' 1. cation R ShE et 2 of 2 Asset -Property Rt ccl d 2*V•L ` • ; -- - ti SSET—PROPERTY RECORu OF • RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORPORATION Office of Defense Plants AN INSTRUMENTALITY OF THE U.S.GOVERNMENT LESSEE: OEING AIRCRAFT COMPANY Inventory No. (RFC/ODP Reboe 117 eattle, Washington ID. P.C. P.O.No. 20424 - Unit Revetrient Office 8: Insp. AL• Dept. PlancorN 156 Schedule II (b) Program Constr. Location Throw- lout ':UildirLg• Manufact rer: Initial Use Quotation: fob Contract Final Use Terms: Vendor: Western Construction Co. (Con*rr.etor) Cat. No.&Date: • Comol eted Acct. No. Pone Serial No. -me 311bnistimt Oct. 1945 Item Electric I .luTnineticn PURCHAS INVOIC CERT. U DESCRIPTION AMONT ORDER N• NO. NO. Lump s ELECTRIC `LLT-`-_ATTO - R1,,ILI ENT OF. 'IC' ? I SP contrc t date. • 3-5-45 11.ectric illumination inetelletion including service, lighting panels, branch circuits 20424 rind lighting fixtures.. • • Interior lip tirg: Tnce^descent fi�tur's, 120 v, 16, Nerious types,. 60 to 200 watt lams. • Exterior liting: 8 500 watt, elliptical angle reflectors; 4 500 watt, Pa` reflectors. Auto-Transformers: 15 KVA for 120/203 v service. Drawing' ' o: SeBec 17 x P 8 Fstimrted cost C::0. 2615 Note: Portion of total paid under all 2626 certificetes. See APR 2C32. 2 638 2650 2694 2696 Refe:^ences: 1uilding Structure: _PR #2'17 Building Tnstcllations: APR #2'192 tbru 94. rote: Includintr t`,e following .installations that cre readily removable or salvageable re Standard Commodity Classificatiowore u"i.is 1 Lo atiOn R `.meet 1 of 3 Asset—Property Record No. - 2;92 - ?SSET—PROPERTY RECORD (Continuation Sheet) pURtMASE �IN' OICE CERT DESCRIPTION _--- _ OM ER NO. NJ NO. • 2 ;fit; Dore Reflector, %njamin :,o. 5641 , for 100 T. tt is C 2.65 `.30 14 MI' Dome Reflector, lepjT "ET.. c. • �643; for 200 watt lrmps • 0 3.30 46.20 . 4. 'Rig' 110me Teflector, '?en,juain• To. ( • 5644, for 3C0 c'.. 500 watt '_traps 0 4.25 17.00 1 • 8 5liptical, `nt-1e Fro ecstcr fixtures,) . IL' reflector.,, 600 -?e.tt imps, 3er ianin• Cat. 'to. 3537 • 07.00 56.00 Sub total. fixtures' only $.124.50 1 1 2 Incandescent lar.ps, 100 watt, 12C i-, inside frosted • .09 .18 14 -nc:andAscent lamris, 200 watt , 120 v, • inside frosted • .1.62 ea. 2.27 • 12 In^endescent lemrs, 500 :ratt .120 v, ' inside frosted 0 .72 ea. 8.64 S't1b total .1. raps only 11.09 • 1 i'f=in switch fusible, Trumbu],1 "Mec- tric Co., 10C amp. , 3 pole, 3 phase 575 v. 0 22.00 22.00 . LiF_rhtin • panel, Trtrlbull Electric Co. , type 11TP, 3 phase, A :ire, 125/250 . volts, as follows: t ' 1 11 circuit " C 44.40 44.40 ^urinery Revethent 1. I Lighting panel, Trumbull tlectr9_e a)., Standard Commodity Classification None 1 Loolttio', R Sheet E olr.,.�.:�____. Asset-Property Reccrd, 2 ? T C7Wir • Ii RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORPORATION Final Inventory No. +TT Office of Defense Plants-Engineering Division Page 7 Of 24 (PN'ges) LESSEE Boeing Aircraft Company, Renton Division PLANCOR NO. 156 ADDRESS Renton, Washington EQUIP. LOCATION 1,= n ,r nl rnO7't I1; • COST PRICE Item DESCRIPTION QUAN. D.P.C.I NV—NO. Cond. F.O.B. MFGR. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) ' (6) 1 Co::npreseed Air Distribution System-Airpor•c 02 CoSt inc3.ud- Includes piping, valves, drains, traps, e& on 2150 etc. Has 100# air supply from compressor for Flight in .Flight Service Bldg. Piping included • Service Bldg. consists of 2" pipe approx. 42010 1 1/2" Se'e page 2 pipe approx. 160' , and 3/4" pipe approx. of: APR APR 2841 600' . attached 2 Air piping on Apron A extension & Aprons thereto. • B, C and D. Approx. 5100' 0" of 2" pipe included. Complete with fittings and • 4.,100.00 valves. 33 outlets installed. on Aprons. CP3stima., • It e d.) • EXTRA MACHINE ATTACHMENTS Note: As further described on APR 2C3 ' H • • ELECTRIC MOTORS FRAME SERIAL H.P. R.P.M. A°C' PHASE VOLTS CYCLE NO. NO. D.C. • CONTROLS SIZE TYPE DESCRIPTION • • ESt�atedTOTAL COST F.O.B. MANUFACTURETS PLANT • -'4,1.Q0.n!' • PROGRAM UNDER WHICH PAID (CONSTRUCTION OR ACQUISITION) Construction Items listed'below are being shipped on this machine but are not Items listed below are missing from this machine. shown above. • Ii Signed BAC Equipment Engineering a • IiI Date Signed R.F.C. Inspection R-2150 CONTINUATION D. P. Ca INVENTORY NUMBERS FROM COLUMN 4 • • • • • • • • • III ' ill Items listed below are being shipped on this machine but are not Items listed below are missing from this machine. shown above. • • Signed BAC Equipment Engineering Date Signed R.F.C. Inspection AO ' ,ASSET PROPERTY RECOR OF RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORPORATION Office of Defense Plants AN INSTRUMENTALITY OF THE U. S.GOVERNMENT LESSEE: B ,SING AIRCRAFT COMPANY Inventory No. S RFC ODP eattle,Washington (D. P. C. ' P.O. No. Unit Compressed Air Distributio Dept. Plancor N. 156 Schedule ii (c) Program Constr. Location Throughout Leasehold Manufactu er: Initial Use Quotation: fob Contract Final Use Terms:See below /endor: See below Cat. No. &Date: Comol eted Acct.No. None Serial No. NoIIe Ritstetwi See belowltem Compressed Air Distri 'lath PURCHASE INVOICE CERT. DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ORDER NO NO. NO. Contract C0_TRFSSED AIR DISTRI3JTION SYSTFY, as follows : • 75616 . .-ated Contractor : The Tustin Co. -3-41 Subcontractor : V. E. 3egps Co. Cost p1 2ixed f Completed: March 1S43 contras Drawing No. : Beaac 0-X ►' 4 Including mains, second. ry lines, branches, outlets, drains, traps, .valves, etc . :3uilo incrs served: Ass emmbly, Camoufl age, ;'Jest Shop, Process, Paint Storage, Personnel, dministrationand Sewage Disposal Plant. kir Supply: 100# air from compressors in Roller House. See APR `'o. 31377. Piping included: 10" Main, approx. 150' g" " " 700' 6" " " 3750' 3" ranch " 50' 2" " " 1850' 1 " " " 3000' 1 *" " " 5350' 1" " " 5600' 3/4 n " " 6500' ' tin,ated cost $ 50,504.00 Standard Commodity Classification None • 1 I ocation R Sheet 1 of 4 Asset—Property Record No.. 2C 3 is .-+SSET-PROPERTY RECOR►. (Continuation Sheet) PURCHASE INVOICE . CERT. DESCRIPTION ' ' • ORDER NO. NO. NO. • 20324 Compressed Air ristribution System EXtension, as follows: 1 Lump . contras Contractor: loerig, Philp end Strand & Sons dated • • 6-9-44 Sub-Contractor: Urban Heating and rltmibing Co. Completed: nine 1945 • Drawing 7o: Rebate 0-X-}' 4 j • Including mains, orenches, outlets, drains, traps, valves, etc. , Building served: Fast Shop and- Cafeteria. . Air supply: 100# air from compressors in • • Boiler douse. 1 . Piping included: 2" main, approx. 80' li" branch, " 600' le " " 350' 1" " " 550' 3/4" " " 325' • EstihLted cost 1 2 ,000.00 Auxiliary Compressed 'ir ristribution System in reel emation ruilding Air Supply: 100# air Comtiressor: Stationery, vertical, single acting, 2-stage, Ingersoll-. Rand Co., type 30, model #64r 9, size 6 x 3 1/2 x 5, belt drive { capacity 52 cfin Q 100 psi. Po-°-er unit included: 1 electric motor 10 hp, 220/440 v, 3 phase, 60 cycle, 1735 rpm, belt drive, com- plete with magnetic starter aid push button station. Complete with air receiver. Overall dimensions: 87" long, 52" ride, 43" high. Standard Commodity Classification Nixie L i cation R ScI,c • 2 of 4 Ai,-, 1 - - - ,> F. , . • - 2C 3 L _ ASSET-PROPERTY RECOR (Continuation Sheet) i______ PURCHASE it: OICE CERT. D E S C R I P T I O N • ORDER NO. :NO. NO. . ___-, 20324 Piping included: 1 1/4", approx. 70' 1 1", " 500' 1 3/4", . " 25' I . . 1/2", " 25' 1 Estimated cost $ ,200.00 . System • at Boeing Compressed Air Distribution 7002$ • Renton Airport. . Contractor: Western Construction Co. fI Sub-Contractor' University Plumbing & Heating . Company. Completed : December 1944 . • • Drawing "o: Re Bac 17-X-r-21 . . Including piping, valves, drains, traps, etc. Buildings served: light Service, Apron A.' • Air Supply: 100# air from compressor in Flight Service 71 dg. See ;PR 'To. 3349 , and 50 for compressor. • Piping included: 2" pipe, t.pprox. 420' 1 r" " " 160' 14" " " 160' • 1" " " 160' 3/4" " " 600' . • Estimated cost t966.00 (Less compressor, motor, receiver, etc. ) 'ote : Included in payments shorn on APR #2B41 sheet 2 for Flight Service Building. 20 326 I T'orthwest Construction Co, Contractor Lump s u ; I Completed: Parch 1945 contra tdated Installation pf air pipin,: on Areas Served : ._ 6-3-44 Apron A extension, and Aprons R, C ?: D. Standard Commodity Classification i'one Losation R Sheet 3 of 4 Asset •Property Record 2C 3 y ^ .ASSET-PROPERTY RECOR (Continuation Sheet) PURCHASE INVOICE CERT. • D E S C R I P T I O N ORDER NO. NO. NO. • Supply: Portable air compressor. (Compressor not included.) Piping included: • Approx. 5100' 0" of 2" pipe • Complete with fittings and valves 33 outlets installed on Aprons. Drawing Number: Re7ac 17-4X-"' 21 Estimeted cost $ 4,100.00 (Portion of total paid under all certificates on this contract. . • See APR #20 20) • Total Estimated Cost • $. 57,804.00 • • • • • Standard Commodity Classification None 1 Lo •ti0n Sheet 4 of 4 Asset Property Rccc : 2C 3 . . ...• • RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORPORATION - Final Inventory No. .d3 Office of Defense Plants-Engineering Division Page 8 Of • '24 (Pages) LESSEE Boeing Aircraft Company, Renton Division PLANCOR NO. 156 • • ADDRESS Renton, Washington EQUIP. LOCATION !--ze2.,-,1An Alrpert CaST PR I CE Item ' DESCRIPTION QUAN. D P.C. I NV—NO.• Cond. F.O.B. MFGR. (1.) • (2) (3) (4) (6) 1 FENCING-Airport: Approx. 12,966 lineal 02 Ct.° 814.38 feet of 6' steel mesh with wood post fencing. Gates consist of 2 pr. double swing for 301 opening, " 2 pr. double swing for 20' opening, and" 1, single swing for 4' opening. Wood posts and -stop " cablesof 3/8" wire rope at roadway entrance: As- further .described on A.P.R. 2010 • • • t EXTRA MACHINE ATTACHMENTS ' ' • • • ELECTRIC MOTORS FRAME SERIAL A C H.P. R.P.M. : :PHASE VOLTS CYCLE D .• • • • CONTROLS SIZE • TYPE DESCRIPTION .• • • TOTAL COST F.O.B. MANUFACTURE'S PLANT 4i;1 al 3,5:1 PROGRAM UNDER WHICH PA ID (CONSTRUCTION OR ACQUISITION) ConstrIlction Items listed below are being shipped on this machine but are not Items listed below are missing from this machine, shown above. :11 Signed BAC Equipment Engineering Date Signed R.F.C. Inspection R-2150 • CONTINUATION D. Pm Ca INVENTORY NUMBERS FROM COLUMN 4 it i II I � 11 • .I • • ' I I ` I II I'I 1.1 • • 11 i II I II Ifl I • I • • • I I I • i I, I • • � I Items listed below are being shipped on this machine but are not Items listed below are missing from this machine. shown above. I'I • I I • ' I , .1 I, �I Signed BAC Equipment Engineering Date 1 _ Signed R.F.C. Inspection 1 II 411 •ASSET-PROPERTY RECOIL, OF RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORPORATION Office of Defense Plants AN INSTRUMENTALITY OF THE U. S.GOVERNMENT LESSEE: B ,EING AIRCRAFT COMPANY Inventory No. (RFC ODP attle,Washington 1 D. P. C. • ' P.O. No. See below Unit Fencing and ' etes Dept. Plancor No 156 Schedule II (c) Program Const_•. Location See below • Manufactu r: See below Initial Use Quotation: fob Contract • Final Use Terms: Vendor: See below Cat. No. & Date: Conpl ete d Acct. No. Gone Serial No. None Iind& See below Item Fencing 4nd Gates PURCHASE INVOICE CERT. DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ORDER NO. NO. NO. • Contras F CY*.T(+ I 'TT1 #5616 Dated Plant Fencing 8-8-41 :'fr. : Cyclone Fence Co. , '..nukepan, Ill. Cost pl s fixed f•e Contractor: The _'_ustin Company contras . Compl eted parch 19.43 ' Location: Renton Plant Perimeter Tyre: 7' Steel fencing Quantity: Lpprox. 4612 tin. ft . Gates : 6 Dr. double swing for 20' opening. 1 pr. sliding for 14' opening. 4 single awing for 4' opening. Construction : I11 steel, H column posts at 10' centers. Tubular top rail and • braces, adjustable extension arm brackets with 3 strands barbed wire, fabric 7' high of 2 x 2 #6 mesh. A11 rates com- plete with hard,';ere, allposts set in concrete. • Drawing o: Re Bac 100-13 Estimated Cost 19,500.00 20524 Standard Commodity Classification None • 'Loa ion R Sheet 1 of 3 Asset-Property Record No._ 2C 10 ror.+) ASSET PROPERTY RECO (Continuation Sheet► PURCHASE INVOICE CERT.ORDER NO. NO. NO. DESCRIPTION AMO Nr• 20324 Lump sum Plant Fencing, Extension, and Rearrangement contract dated ;-9-44 Mfr.: Cyclone Fence Ca.; Waukegan, Illinoi- Contractor: . Coerig, Philp and Strand & Sons ' Completed: June 1945 Location: . Decimation Bldg. Area • Type : 7' steel fencing • Quantity: !Tnrox.. 1200 lineal ft. • Construction: all steel, H column posts at • 10' centers. Tubular top rail and brac- adjustable extension arm buckets with • 3, strands barbed wire, fabric 7'high o ' 2 x 2 46 mesh. :11 rates complete with hardware, all posts set in concrete. • Cost • $ 2,342.48 • 70031 • ,airport Fencing • Law s contrc.c , Contractor: Western Construction Co. • dated 10-9-43 Completed: 1944 • Location: Boeing Renton Airport Perimeter Type: 6' steel mesh with rood post fencing Quantity: Approx. 12,966 lin. ft. Gates : 2 pr. Double swing for 30' opening 2 " " n " 201 1 Single " " 4' Construction: 6" x 6" wood posts at 10" centers, wood extension arns with 3 • strands of barbed wire, fabric 4' 6" high of steel mesh. "11 gates complete with hardware. Drawing No: Austin 26 and Rebac 100-13 Standard Commodity Classification None Cost 10,742.95 • 1 L.cation P Shcct 2 of 3 Asset.-Property Recc, 2 C 10 e.. /SSET—PROPERTY RECOk• (Continuation Sheet) PURCHASE INVOICE CERT. DESCRIPTION ORDER NO NO. NO. Paid as follows; 7026 30.40 7026 805.50 7030 2,553.00 7053 . 1,424.83 7063 3,330.81 7077 1,210.71 • • • 7119 286.45 • 7124 _ 1,071 .25 • • 10,742.95 • 70056 Airport, posts end stop cable. • Vendors Boeing J,i rcrF: t Company Location: Roadway entrance into airport • 'lope: ood posts, 3/8" wire rope. Drawing 'o: Re nac #17-640-C 13. 5466R 7140 Cost • 71.43 . Total $ 32,656.56 • • • • Standard Commodity Classification None Location R •Sheet 3 of 3 Asset-Propel ty Record 2C 10 c„ •-sue "i 4 RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORPORATION Final Inventory No. Office of Defense Plants-Engineering Division Page 9 Of 2 (rages) . LESSEE Boeing Aircraft Company, Renton Division PLANCOR NO. 156 II, ADDRESS Renton, Washington EQUIP. LOCATION Ren.tOn Airport COST PRICE Item DESCRIPTION QUAN. D.P.C. INV—NO. Cond. F.O.B. MFGR. . (1) (2) (3) (4) , (5) ' , ?, (6) 1 Gasoline Tanks & Pumps-Airport :-2 under- 02 to �:5,705.65 ground storage tanks with a cap. ' of approx. ,! 1. 10,000 gals. each. Located at Airport . . entrance road. Constructed of reinforced concrete. Each is 9' 4" wide x 26' 4" long I x 99' B" deep, overall 'dimensions. . 0" walls 1 with 10" floor 'slab. and 10" roof slab. In- 'I,, eludes a motor driven - suction pump with metering equipment. Capacity 200 GPM. :I, 2 Pump House-One room wood frame shed, 7' 6" x a' 0" x 7' 0" high. Floor is of 6" con- ' crete paving. Installation for electric ., i11 uumin^titan. include sub-feeders, lighting I EXTRA:;Mgd xNE IMCNIa Iae. - HI panels, branch circuits and. lighting : - fixture. Electric Power installation in- I. eludes feeder from Plight Service Bldg. ' !. . No heating, plumbing or sprinklers in this ' Bldg. Note: As further described on APR 2012. °.I ELECTRIC MOTORS , III' FNOAME SENOIAL H.P. R.P.M. p�g�PHASE VOLTS CYCLE • . CONTROLS ; i' SIZE TYPE DESCRIPTION i ,11 I• l • 11, TOTAL COST F.O.B. MANUFACTURE T S PLANT Wc9 t 705.65 I PROGRAM UNDER WHICH PAID (CONSTRUCTION OR ACQUISITION) Construction ' Items listed'below are being shipped on this machine bu•t are not Items listed below are missing from this machine, . shown above. , 'I, 11, II - Signed •'` BAC Equipment Engineering 1 Date Signed f R.F.C. Inspection I! R-2150 I i • CONTINUATION D. Pa C. INVENTORY NUMBERS FROM COLUMN 4 ' I i i I ' • i I 1 ' I I II j, • • - I II ' I I I,II Items listed below are being shipped on this machine but are not Items listed below are missing from this machine. shown above. • 1 I �I Signed SAC Equipment Engineering Date Signed i• R.F.C. Inspection - .ASSET—PROPERTY RECORD. • • OF RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORPORATION Office of Defense Plants AN INSTRUMENTALITY OF THE U.S.GOVERNMENT LESSEE: B P EING AIRCRAFT COMPANY Inventory No. (RFC ODP (tattle,Washington /D. P. C. • ' P.O. No. wee below Unit "esoline Tanks Dept. PlancorN• 156 Schedule Ii (c) Program Constr. Location Penton Leasehold'. • Manufactu er: Initial Use Quotation: fob' Contrcet • • Final Use Terms: Vendor: Various, see below Cat. No. & Date: Completed Acct. No. one Serial No. "one • Minot See below Item "aso'line Tanks PURCHASE INVOICE CERT ORDER NO. NO NO.. DESCRIPTION AMOUNT . Goitre i t GASOLINE T NfiS Ar.D POTS Wain Plant) #5616 ' Dated Contractor: The "ustin Co. • 8-3-41 Sub-Contractor: 7. L. Beggs Co. • Cost p u. fixed e• Completed: March 1°43 contra, t Type: `.'nderground steel plate storage tanks Size Qc Use: 2 1000 gal. tank for Service Station 1 120 pal. tank for Energency Fire Pump 1 550 gal. tank for Snergency Generator ' Pumps: 1 Gasoline pump at service station Ihrawing Number: Lustin 1r-12 • • stimated cost ('."gin Plant) 1,200.0: Reference: Service Stetton, :_T'P. #2'19 7Q028 Gas of i ne Tanks and Pumps ("i rport) Lump - 1+ Contractor: .7estern Construction Co. contra, t dated Completed: December 1944 -18-4 Type: 2 Underground storage tanks CnmBc i ty• 1/p'nrbY. 10,000 gals. each. Standard Commodity Classification TTofo1 L c•.tion ?t .riot 1 of 4 Asset—Property Record No._ 2Q2 ASSET—PROPERTY RECORi3 (Continuation Sheet) PURCHASE INVOICE CERT. DESCRIPTION • ORDER NO. NO. NO. • Location: Entrance road of riroort Construction: "Reinforced concrete Size: Each 9' 4" wide x 26' 4" long x 9' 8" deep, overell dtmensions. 8" wells with 10" floor slab and 10" roof slab. • Pump: 'otor driven .suction pump with. metering • eauinment. Capecity 200 arr. Pump House: Ore room, wood frame she', overal' . dimensions 7' . 6" x 8' 0" x 7' 0". high. Total floor Brea: 60 sc. !t. Total cubic contents: 390 cu. ft. % Floor: .6" concrete peeing, under. separat: . contrect. • Roof: Shed type; composition roofing on shiplap. • "ote: "o heatinp, plumbing or sprinklers • - in this building. • Iectri•c Illumination: Instz lletion including subfeeders, lighting panels, branch circuits' end lighting fixtures.' Interior lighting: • 1- 150 watt explosion proof Exterior lighting: 1 explosion proof floodlight, 120 volt; 200 watt incandescent lemp. .ectric Power: •Instellstion including feeder from Plight Service 71dg. System characteristics: 3 phase 3 wire, 440 volt. Caracity: 5 KVA • Drewing No.: Austin A-7 Cost • 5456.06 Paid follows: 7022 229.50 7023 114 75 Standard Commodity Clossi,cation r.Orie ' ocation R Sheet 2 of 4 Asset Property Recold: 1' C ti2 Oc I?SSET-PROPERTY RECORD (Continuation Sheet) PURCHASE INVOICE CERT. DESCRIPTION ORDER NO. NO. NO. • _ ______` 7030 • 1,032.75 704C 726.65 7053 1,022.62 . • 7063 939.20 . 7C78 295.42 7084 22.73 711.6 527.83. ' 7130 545.61 • • . 5,456:06 70063 Primer and paint for above tanks, .firnished. . by Stoner-'hdfre Company. . 7102 193.56 7111 Freight bn above 43.16 '70065 '.'i scellaneous met'-rial furnished b: 3etni s 'ro. 1 7102 77.ar Co. 12.87 • :Iotci. cost (?irport) le' 5,705.65 References: Building ,tructure: APR #2_. 14 . . ' Building Installations : . ArR #2t366 and* 67. 20324 . sa r cl ine Tanks ra Pumps (Fast Shop dv.) ' ontrec Contractor: Soerig, Philp end ,Strand ° fins dated 6-9-44 Completed: June 1945 Lump s Tyoe: • 2 Undergrour d sheet metel storen.e. contrac . tanks . Size : 1,000 gal. capacity each Location: Fast Shop Service Island Pump : rotor driven suction pump with metering equipment. 'raving -umber: Austin .P!-A 20 Fstimeted cost (`:est $hor) ) 1,000.00 Total Estimated cost (111 -,asaline tanks ➢: pu s) 7,905.65 ?Tote: Including the following installations that are readily removable or salvageable I StUdard Lommodity Classification • .'one • 1 Lo -tioti :3 Sheet 3 of 4 Asset .Property Raced 2C 1 2 £SET-PROPERTY RECOR. ' - (Continuation Sheet) PURCHASE INVOICE CERT. D E S C R I P i l O N I AM.CUNT, ORDER NO. NO. NO. • • 1 Pu:~:p, eyn e Pump Co., -nodel 676 D, 1 1/2" size, canplete with 1/5 hp, 17='5 rpm, 115/230 volts, 1 phase, . 60 dycle motor. (i.t 'Fast Shop pldg ) .250.00 • 1 r7eeoline pump, Thyne Pump Co. , #376 government apecie1, with 10' 0" . hose, (At Service fitetion--Peint . storage mega.) 19C.00 Sub=Total (Win Plant)$ 440.00 .1 Pymp, "ieyne Purrp Co. , `.'odel, 569-4 • • with 5 hp, 2450 PTV., 220/440 volt, 3 phase, 60 cycle motor. (.irport) • 350.00 1 Explosions proof, ceiling mounted fixture, 150 watt ltmm, Crouse-Hind • Crt. ''o. TVA 1151•. 18.50 . 18.50 • 1 Floodlight, Pxplos1on proof, ^.rurni•n mounted, .500 watt lem' , narrow beam Crouse-Hinds type PCDE-8 .cet. no. : . 41719:.. 0 37.12 37.12 . • 1 Incandescent lerp, 150 watt, 120 v, . inside frosted. .12 .12 • 1 Incandescent.lamp, 500 watt, 120 v, clear bulb C .72 .72 1 Trumbull t:Te 7.!-0 ; ulti-breeker, '_;o G1032, issue no. ±-473, 115/230 v. 7.00 7.00 • Sub-to tel (e irnort)$413.46 • Total (:readily re-Movables), 853.46 Standard Commodity Classification one I Sheet 4 oi, 4 Asset-Property Record 2 C 12 1 Lo etion R ow; • lit . it • RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORPORATION Final Inventory No. • Office of Defense Plants-Engineering Division Page 10 Of (Pages) LESSEE Boeing Aircraft Company, Renton Division PLANCOR NO. 156 ADDRESS Renton, Washington EQUIP. LOCATION Rrar,t:nn tv-i rnort Item DESCRIPTION QUAN. D.P.C. INV-NO. Cond. COST PRICE F.O.B. MFGR. (i) (2) (3) (4) (5) l', (6) . 1 Airport Lighting-Contact and range lights, 025, 70,991. 35 runway floodlights, directional wind. tee, Except ceiling projector, master control panel, see complete with .all control wiring, and all note electrical work on apron A. Aprons A. B. C. , & T. Pole line distribution system cduplete with floodlights, obstruction lights, panels 120 and 440 volt receptacles anc:. stitches. Total length of pole lines, 6,rd70f . Note: As 'further described on APR 2C17 • EXTRA MACHINE ATTACHMENTS • '11 • j• ELECTRIC MOTORS FRAME SERIAL H.P. R.P.M. A.C. N0. N0. D C. PHASE VOLTS CYCLE CONTROLS 1 SIZE TYPE DESCRIPTION • .,lip • I TOTAL COST F.O.B. MANUFACTURE'S PLANT G,.rr0 001 35 • PROGRAM UNDER WHICH PAID (CONSTRUCTION OR ACQUISITION) Construction • • II Items listed below are being shipped on this machine but are not Items listed below are missing from this machine: shown above. Note regarding condition: Cable Cable grounded or shorted out, flood from. control tower to and in- lights, north end, main runwdy. eluding north end floodlights are +, in f:;-3 condition. Signed BAC Equipment Engineering Signed • R.F.C. Inspection I CONTINUATION D. P. C. INVENTORY NUMBERS FROM COLUMN 4 1 , • 1 • I, . I. _ I I 1, f ti 1 111 1.! . II i; 1,1 • I li C j,! II III d� I 1_ f • Items listed below arebeing shipped on this machine but are not Items listed below are missing from this machine. I shown above. -, I f. 1 Signed BAD Equipment Engineering Date Signed ;s • R.F.C. Inspection 1 II k 1 .11V ....) , . . ,. ASSET-PROPERTY RECORD OF RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORPORATION • Office of Defense Plants • • AN INSTRUMENTALITY OF THE U.S.GOVERNMENT LESSEE: B 4' ING AIRCRAFT COMPANY Inventory No. c RFC/ODP S attle,Washington jD. P.C. • ' • P.O. No. Unit Lighting—Yard,. Fence & Airpo - Dept. lancor No. 156 Schedule II (c) Program Cor• tr. Location Renton Leasehold Manufactu :r: Initial Use Quotation: fob Final Use Terms: Vendor:Vai 'ous,See Below Cat. No.&Date: . Co :t Item Airport Acct. No. None Serial No. None ._ . . . . _ . -. e & PURCHASE INVOICE CERT.ORDER NO. NO. NO. DESCRIPTION AMOUNT • Contra& LIGHTING - YARD, FENCE AND AIRPORT, as follows: #5616 . Dated . Contractor: The Austin Company 8-8-41 Sub-Contractor: Van S. McKenny Co. • Cost p fixed e Completed: March 1943 contre.t Work Included: Fence Lighting: A complete series lighting system consisting of 48 pole mounted luminaires. spaced approx. 150' O.C. along fence around Main Plant area, a constant current transformer complete with protector, relays and controls. Parking Lot Lighting: A complete series . lighting system consisting of 34 po e mounted luminaires spaced approx. 150' O.C. around Parking lot area, = constant current transformer complete with protector, relays and controls Yard Lighting: Flood and Curb lights 1 I at approaches to Floating Bridge & I in the Boat House area, consisting o ' • 36 incandescent fixtures, 120 volt, of various -toes, with 100 to 250 watt lamps. Drawing Number: ReBAC 0-X-E 15 20 000.00 Estimated cost Standard Commodity Classification • 1 Page 1 of 11 Asset -Property Record No.. 2C17 v..J' 'SSET—PROPERTY RECOR r (Continuation Sheet) PURCHASE INVOICE 1 CERT. r_! ORDER NO. NO. NO. DESCRIPTION ( A t• 20324 Contractor: Goerig, 1hilp 3trrn6 a, Sons Lump s „ 'gib-Contractor: City Electric & 7ixture Co. contra, fated ;oi 1eted: June 1C44 6-9-44 . • Mork Included.: . . rlteretions to fence, perking lot end yard lighting e,. required by new con- . • • struction. • Drawing -0. : Austin 105 • • • • 2659 Estir pted cost x 2,20E3.79 70010 '.ror'rt. Tlectricel •,ork •Lump sin ';ontractor: J. utter ' .Co. . contrG• t . dated Completed: December 1945 • . 6-14-, . '':ork t^cluded : Contract anc' •rt-nge lights, run- way flooairhts, directio^.£1 Grind tee, ceklix g proiector, marter control ptanel, complete'. • with al control 7i.rin , ., -11 e1ectri.c .1 work on apron. . "o:;t , MOO Paid a:; follows: 16257 7020 • 1,549.45 s 7024 3,096.90 • II 7030 2,530.75 " 70._7 6,963.03 " 7052 8,185.37 " 7065 4,795.60 " 7C75 3,836.48 . " 7083 639.41• " 7118 319.71 " 7126 ___ 3,552.30 35,523.00 70016 Performance Bard on contract 70010 of J. T. • Aautter Co. 16257 7019 14:7. 7 20327 Contrector: T. T. Agutter & Co. Lump - :;orml eted: June 1945 contra t Standard Commodity Classification r.or e i 11 • 1 L. ,etion ^ Shcct 2 of 11 Asset Property Record_ 2C 17 I (— R. SSET— PERTY RECORL �) P O • (Continuation Sheet) PURCHASE IN OICE I C:ERi • DESCRIPTION ORDER NO. NO. NO. A-_ 'York Included.: Aprons .., B, C, P;c, P. Pole ling distribution system complete • with floodlights, obstruction lirhts, Te_ els • 120 End 440 volt receptacle^ Prd switche . 'Ibtal length of pole lines, 6,77Q' . . Cost a 32,156.87, • Paid as follows:. _ • . 2545 9,000.00 2531 10,75".32 , • 2601 • 9,183.86 2636 3,215.69 • 32,156.87 . 20409 2669 J. J. ::Futter ^nd Co. ' • Purchase of silrplus electrical material 1,401 .34 20391 2571 F. :.. t'elthorpe Engineerinm services rendered or. estimat: #403 for J. 3. ;gutter and Co. contract , Yo. 20327 75.00 70070 ';.estinrhouse Electric Supply Co. . . ' ec .rical materials • 1,283.81 Paid es follows: "52330 7118 165.86 W5438 7123 219.45 . I C679076 7144 868.55 S3'5124 7144 29.95 1,283.81 • Puget Sound Power rnd Light Co. 70049 10244-10: 7068 Oil Switches and services 131. 9 70066 M744-3 8 7117 Temporary electric service to concrete plant at construction site. 244, 37 70068 :[744-32' 7117 Inetal1 ti on of cut-outs n •7r • Total Estimfited cost t 93,200.14 Standard Commodity Classification 1,:one L: cation '; 5hcet 3 o'' 11 Asset—Property Record .2 C 17 .ASSET PROPERTY RECORto. (Continuation Sheet) PURCHASE I INVOICE -CERT.ORDER NO NO. NO. DESCRIPTIQN AMOUNT' Vote: Including the following-installations that ere readily removsble or selvegecble es units: Fence Lighting System: • 48 Luminaires, General 7lectric Co. , • 3791608G31, form 45TI3- • 79R, complete with hood, wet process insulator, socket, and form 79R • reflector .and refractor. Z 21.37 ea.- 1,025.76- • 48 ?,Best arms, Line ?tteri al Company, Cat. .o. L14705-r, 12'., rod type • O 11.25 ea. 540.00 • • 1. Transformer, renerel Electric Co. , Constant current, type P0-60 cycles, 20 Elf, 440 volt primar::, 6.6 amperes secondary, oil immersed., outdoor type, • includinc• cross arm PrIO mounting; brack- et. C 572.40 ' 572.40 • Controls : • 1 ''aanetic switch, General 'Lectric Co. primary control of 120 volt coil, Cat. 14. 4386919(104 type CR-2?11-75 ampere, 440 volt, two pole. .. O 32 .80 32.80 1 Novelux protector, General .ectric Co. , multiple control, cat. no. 32081E4 6.6 amperes, 120 volt. 65.25 par'dng Lot Lighting System. 34 Luminaires, General Electric Canpeny, Cat. 'To. 379160354, form 104-727, consisting of `'resnel lens and mounted on "orm 72 insulator end wi h universal pole mounting bracket. 23.98 815.32 • 1 Transformer, General Electric Co., constant current, type 20 60 cycle, 15 FW, 440 volt pri^-ary, 6.6 amperes secondary, oil immersed, outdoor type ^ith cross-arm susrensionn hooks. 496.34 496.34 Standard Commodity Classification "ore °c•. t:oa 4 or 11 Asset 'rcl tt,t) Rrccrd 20 17 c- '. .SSET-PROPERTY RECORD_, (Continuation Sheet) PURCHASE INVOICE CERT. DESCRIPTION ORDER NO. NO. NO. Controls: . 1 Marnetic switch, Geneml 7aectric Co., primary control. of 120' volt coil, Cat. . Mo. 4386919G104 type CR-2311-75 ampere 440 volt, ,Ttto pole. C 32.80 32.80 1 "ovelux protector, General '�'1.ectric Co • "ultiple control, Cat. 'To. 3203154, 6.: • amperes, 120 volt. . 65.25 1 Photoelectric controller, '_'.7. Co. Type CR-75C5-T109 . • 4 . 45.00 ' • 82 Lamps, Street series lighting service ' • ' mogul hese, 6.6 Amperes , 6000 lumens ' 1.35 . • 110.70 Poles 63 Ceder poles, 35' lonr, butt treated . ' 014.10 926.10 • 2 Cedar poles, 50' lon«, butt treated .: 19.00 313.00. ' 2 Cedar poles, 45' long, butt treated ' C 16.00 32.00 1 Cedar poles, 40' long, butt treated . 015.00 15.00 Sub-total (Fence ,f- Parking i4,812.72 lights) . Yard hightinc 2 Flooci1ivhts, 250 T ett lamas, C. E. Co. . Type L-38-CT, 40° spread 4118.00 36.00 10 Vaportight fixtures, Grayber §773579 with half shade, 100 crett lamps. ' 3.00 30.00 13 Pit "ixture4 with 'refracting glass cover and wire r*uard, 3enjemin, 100 watt lamps. 10.00 130.00 Standard Commodity Classification None ' • 1 Locution R Sheet 5 of 11 Asset—Property Record 2 C 17 On,' J t . ASSET—PROPERTY RECOR.�, • U • (Continuation Sheet) PURCHASE , INVOICE CERT. DESCRIPTION • I AMOUNT. ORDER NO NO. NO. • 4 Vaportipht Fixtures, ' aybcr type VD' , • with half shade, 100 :c.tt lerns • C 2.50 10.00. . 4 T'JY Dome Reflectors, Benjamin No. 5641, for 100 watt lamps. �► 2.65. • 10.60 ' . 1 FEZ: Dome Reflectors, Eeniemin'ro. 5643 • for .200 wett lams . • 0 3.30 3.30 . . 2 alipti cal , :angle fixtures, TLY reflec- , tors, 200 watt lamps, Teniamin t 2.00 . 4.00 . • Lamps : . 31 Incandescent lamps, 100 `watt, 120 •volt, inside froste. 4 .09 • - 2.79 3 Incandescent lamps, 200 tt,. 12G volt, inside frosted ..!' • .162 .49 2 Ineerdescent. 1^mps, 250 watt, 120 volt, clear bulb. . r 1.15 2.30 . . ! i scellenepus 1 Lighting panel, Trumbull Electric Co. Ii1ti-brecker type, 120/208 volt, 6 circuit • 0 7.70 . 7.70 Sub total (Yard lighting) ; 237.18 Airport Apron Lighting System 28 Floodlights, :vesting ouse `To. 1119650, 1000 watt, 120 volt, Wide beam unit, • plain lens, with cross-ann mounting. 28.00 784.00 94 7loodlights, 1000 watt, open type, Crotise-Finds Cat. No. 43909, with wide beam. 20.00 1,880.00 Standard Commodity Classification '.p!le 1 Loc tion R Sheet 6 of 11 Asset—Property Record. 2C17 • . SET-PROPERTY .RECORL (Continuation Sheet) RCHASE ,NVOICE CERT. D E S C R I P 1 1 0 N I AMGUNT. • JER NO. NO. NO. 30 Obstruction lights, Folophane "o. 2353, 50 watt, 240 volt 03.02 240.60 • 11 Obstruction lirhte , t'olonhene 2053, •50 watt,. 120 volt O8.02 88.22 • Letups • • 43 Incandescent lamps, 60 •att, .120 v. inside frosted O .06 . 2.58 122 Incandescent lamps, 1000 watt, 120 v, • cl ear., mogul • O 2.85 347.70 • Receptacles • 96 Receptacles, Crouse-Hihds, IJE 7,312, 30 amp, 250 v,• 3 wire, Z pole. 6.65 . 571.90 18 Receptacles , Crouse-Minds, ;To. :nP 3422, 30 amp, 600 r, 3 -Are,. 4 role. 9.20 147.60 • 1 Receptacles, Cro'ise-Hincs, Jo. AH" 100 amp, 600 volt, 3 phase, / pole, Jrklite r 20.25 20.25 umar Switches 22 Double-Pole, 20 v, heavy duty, tora1.e type.. • .80 17.60 66 Sinnle-pole, 20 amp, 250 v, hesvy duty, tocTle tyre. r .75 49.50 Penels 33 10-circuit FAiels, Trumbull •lectric Co., TTo. 2910, 3 wire, 125/250 volt mains, 2 wire, single plus fuse brr.nc`",• s complete with weatherproof housinc_. RR qq� 288.75 Standord�'�Loii odity Classification None • L 'cation R Sheet 7 of 11 Asset—Property Record. 2C17 o„et _.ASSET—PROPERTY RECO�c.. (Continuation Sheet) PURCHASE INVOICE CERT. DESCRIPTION AMOUNT• ORDER NO NO. NO. • 2 6-Circuit panels, 7'rum:;ull Flectric . Co. , o. P906, 3 7.rire, 125/250 volt • mein- , 2 hire, single -plug fuse bre.nch:s Complete Yri th Trnecther-proof housing. • C 6.00 .12.00 Safety Switches . 32 ''usible switches, Trumbull Fl ectri c • • Co. . ''o. 123322, 60 amp, 175/ 250 v, • . 3 pole, solid neutral , reintiaht. 6.05 193.60 . I 18 r . risible srttches, Trumbull ectric Co. , 'lb. '.740362, 60 amp, 600 volt, 3 pole,. reintig t • . C 15.00 270.00 • Transformers • / • 6 Transformers; • Co. 25 K'TA Line ••aterit-1 2400/240-480 volt,' single phase, oil filled, out-door type. • O 180.00 1 ,080.00 4 Tra sforriers, Line Material Co. , 25 K7A, 2400/120-240 volt, singe -,lar.se, oil filled, out-^oor type. • ,-, 200.00 800.00 • 3 Transformers, Line "£terial Co., 15 01, 2400/120-240 volt, single phase, oil filled, out-door tne. 140.00 420.00 . 1' Transformer, 'rr.ern1 Electric Co. , 15 'ETTA, 2400-410C/120-240 volt, single phase, oil filled ,. out-door tytpe. 140.00 140.00 • _'used Cut—Outs 1t Primary, 'Teed cut-outs, 100 amp. 5000 volts . s 25.00 350.00 16 Primerv, Ttilse.' cut-outs, 50 err., 5000 volts. • A 11.00 176.00 • ( Standard Commodity Classification "one I 1 ocation R Sheet 8 of 11 Asset—Property Record. 20 17 • 3SET—PROPERTY RECORI ;, �. (Continuation Sheet) PI; VASE INVOICE CERT. D E S C R I F i l O N .DROER NO. NO. NO. - • Potheads • • 5 l'otheadr, 2 conductor,. 5000 volt , • 1/0 maximum • C 13.60 68.00 • 2 Potheeds, 3 conductor, 5000 volt, 1/0 maximum 0 19.2Q 38.40 Photo Electric Raley • 1 Photoelectric relay, Generel Flectric Co., Type CR7505-F111 50.00 50•.00 • vh' es . 32 Western Red Ceder, 45! Long, ?utt ' • • 'treated. • 16.00 512.00 • • 9 Western Red Cedar, 50' long•, butt trey+ed. 0 19.00 ' 171.00 4 :7estern Red Ceder, 30' lonr, Mutt tre-ted 0 11.00 44.00. 7 7estern Red Ceder, 40' long, butt trr-fl ted 15.00 105 .0r ,lh total aprons $' 3,868.70 • Airport Runway 20 Contact li Phts , clear, Crouse-'-inds Cet. ro. CPD 43484C 36.00 720.00 32 Contect lights, half yellow n.r.c' her. clear, Crouse-TTinds Cat. ..o. CPT 43484 0 40.00 1,280.00 • 8 Range lights, 1000 Lumens, Crouse- T3n ds Cat. No. CPD 434840 040.00 320.00 Standard Commodity Classification 'gone Sheet Asset—Property Record 2C 17 ' Cocoon { 9ofall ASSET-PROPERTY RECOR . ,. )• (Continuation Sheet) S•,I INVOICE CERT. DESCRIPTION AMOUNT, ORDERRDER N• NO. NO. • Lamps • • 52 s Lviction r Service, 320 lumens , 6.6 amp., med. prefocus base. 0 .J6 .1S.72 • 8 Lamps, rviation Service,. 1000 lumens, medium prefoci s base. . +t .36 . 2.88 3 Isolating Transformers, Cener,1 Elec- tric Co., series multiple type 6.6 . amp. primary, 110 volt secondary 2 - E50 watt 0 45.00 90.00 1 - 750 watt C 54.00 ' 54.00 144.00 • 6 Obstruction lights, Westinghouse, "o. 892760, 60 watt, 120 volt, red prismatic . ' globes. t" 8.02 48.12 1 Obstruction lic't,_ Daplex, Westinghouse 7o. 892765, "ultiple, 2 - 60 watt • I lams, 120 volt, red prismatic -lobes. 0'29.40 29.40 1 Directional rind Tee, Ftanc'ard Free swinging type, equipped with 30 - 25 . watt lamps,. blue globes, "iestinghouse 'T'o, 122391. a 150.00 150.00 2 Tianks of floo dli-hts, each consisting • of floocli?hts , 3000 watt, 32 volt, 10° spread lens, Crouse--inds DCE-24, t;o. 42482P, eouirp ed with 2 1/2" slip fitters. 6 lights `1 300.00 1,600.00 2 Transformers, 7.5 KVA Cen-ral nectric Co., Distribution type, single phase, 2400 volt primary, 32 volt secondary 2 wire, with 4 - ,1/2% taps below rated voltage anti vith rooket type bushings. 0 330.00 660.00 1 Ceiling Projector, Crouse-Finds type DCE-16, Model 11, art. 1:o. 44185, with Standard Commodity Classification one • 1 Location R Sheet 10 of 11 Asset-Property Record 20 17 • r,SSET-PROPERTY RECORD (Continuation Sheet) PURCHASE INVOICE CERT. DESCRIPTION ORDER N• , NO. NO. I-- Clinometer Crouse-Hinds Cet. "To. 44173 O 220.00 220.00 1 faster Control Tbsk, for remote contro. of r•11 runway and airport opern-tinp li • its. • O 400.00 400.00 3 Oil switches, South ''end Current • Controller Co., type R`., 2 pole, 125 v 60 cycle, specification 4216, serial • numbers: 15556, 15557, and 15558. 0 100.00 300.00 1 'Aised panel with the following equip. and circuits. • 4 15 emp. circuit breakers, with solid neautral 4 - F 1eys, Westinghouse type, P.- • 30-A, single pole. 60.00 Sub-total Airport Ann'-ay lighting t 6,153.12 Totel yard , fence °• eirnort (reedily re,ovables) $20 ,071.72 • • Standard Commodity Classification -'on e 1 .L 1.1 Asset riert • II • _ - • • RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORPORATION Final Inventory No. A Office of Defense Plants-Engineering Division Page 11 Of 24 (Pages) LESSEE Boeing Aircraft Company, Renton Division PLANCOR NO. 156 ADDRESS Renton, Washington EQUIP. LOCATION F?en t 011. Airport III COST PRICE Item DESCR I PT ION QUAN. D.P.C.INV—NO. Cond. •F.O.B. MFGR. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) 1 (6) 1 Western Fed Cedar Poles, butt treated, 2 20409 02. } ' 35.88 roofed and gained. (Used, on Airport by Boeing Aircraft Co. ) EXTRA MACHINE ATTACHMENTS . a ELECTRIC MOTORS FRAME SERIAL H.P. R.P.M. A°C' PHASE ,VOLTS CYCLE NO. NO. D.C. • ail CONTROLS p, SIZE TYPE DESCRIPTION II, i': TOTAL COST F.O.B. MANUFACTURErS PLANT 1 35.88 PROGRAM UNDER WHICH PAID (CONSTRUCTION OR ACQUISITION) Construction Items listed below are being shipped on this machine but are not Items listed below are missing from this machine. shown above. • 1 it Signed • BAC Equipment Engineering Date Signed A.F.C. Inspection i R-2150 CONTINUATION De P. C. INVENTORY NUMBERS FROM COLUMN 4 m 16 I , Items listed below are beiing shipped on this machine but are not Items listed below are missing from this machine. shown above. ' III Signed • BAC Equipment Engineering [ Date Signed R.F.C. In ion • • RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORPORATION Final Inventory No. '1. 3 Office of Defense Plants-Engineering Division Page 12 Of 0/1. (Pages) LESSEE Boeing Aircraft Company, Renton Division PLANCOR NO. 156 ADDRESS Renton, Washington EQUIP. LOCATION J cnten ^,i rpert, Item DESCRIPTION QUAN. D.P.C. INV—NO. Cond. COT PRICE (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) F1. (6)FGR. .1 Asphaltic Paving-Airport: Approx. 177,000 02 469,300.00 squ yds. of 3/4" minus mineral aggregate (Estimated) topping, surfaced 'with oil, the whole bladed and rolled on Airport runway shoulders, etc. 2 Approx. 32,000 sq. yds. of asphaltic con 51,000.00 crete on Perimeter Road and bituminous (Estimated) surfacing on stabilized areas. 3 Approx. 1150 sq. yds. of 2" asphaltic con- 3,784.79 crete at Gunnery Revetment. Note: As further described on APR C19 EXTRA MACHINE ATTACHMENTS ELECTRIC MOTORS FRAME SERIAL H.P. R.P.M. A°C' PHASE VOLTS CYCLE NO. NO. D.C. • • •• CONTROLS • SIZE TYPE DESCRIPTION • • •I Estimated TOTAL COST F.O.B. MANUFACTURErS PLANT Qi124,084.79 PROGRAM UNDER WHICH PAID (CONSTRUCTION OR ACQUISITION) Construction Items listed below are being shipped on this machine but are not Items listed below are missing from this machine. shown above. Signed • d_ BAC Equipment Engineering i� Date Signed II R.F.C. Inspection R-2150 _ ', CONTINUATION De P. C. INVENTORY NUMBERS FROM COLUMN 4 • • • • • Items listed below are being shipped on this machine but are not Items listed below are missing from this machine. shown above. • Signed BAC Equipment Engineering Date Signed R.F.C. In- 'ion • 41110 ASSET-PROPERTY RECORD. OF RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORPORATION Office of Defense Plants AN INSTRUMENTALITY OF THE U. S.GOVERNMENT LESSEE B"EING AIRCRAFT COMPANY Inventory No. S RFC/ODP •rattle,Washington D. P. C. ' P.O. No. See below Unit Paving-Asphaltic Dept. Plancor No 156 Schedule II ( c) Program COnstr. Location See below Manufactu -r: Initial Use Quotation: fob Final Use Terms: vendor: Various, See below Cat. No.&Date: C l eted Acct. No. None Serial No. *Tcne on see below item paving--Asphaltic PURCHASE INVOICE CERT.ORDER NO. NO. NO. DESCRIPTION AMOUNT Contract PAVING -- h_SP7?4LTIC #5616 Dated Main Plant 8-3-41 Contra -tor: The Dustin Co. Cost plu- fixed fe- Sub-Contractor: ;'Iashinqton Asphalt Co. con:rcct Completed: March 1943 Location: nenton leasehold Type: Asphaltic concrete Quantity: !_nprox. 40,000 sa . yds. !•seas: Plant yerd areas except East Shop end Cafeteria Bldg. nrawing Rem".0 100-13 and Dustin paving plans. Estimcted cost $ 46,599.63 20324 Contractor: Goerig, Philp and Strand andl Sons Lump s contrac Completed; Tune 1945 Dated 6-9-44 Location: rtenton Leasehold Type : Asphaltic concrete Standard Commodity Classification Hone 1 Lo`-tion R Sheet 1 of 3 Asset—Property Record No._ 2C 19 F • t 0114 , .SSET—PROPERTY RECOR • (Continuation Sheet) PURCHAS: INVOICE CER1. DESCRIPTION ORDER N• NO. NO. _ 20324 Quantity: ipprox. 5600 so. yds. Including misc. patching. • • Drawing =.-umber: Austin A,-K-3 h-R2 EStimeted cost 4 10,000.00 • Sub-total (Main Plant) $ 56,599.63 70005 Bituminous Surfacing rport Runway' Shoulders, etc. Lump S u contrac , Contractor: orthe:est Construction'Co. Dated 5-28-43 Completed: December 1944 Type: 3/4" minus mineral aggregate top- . . ping, surfzced with oil, the whole bladed end rolled. quantity: Approx. 177 ,000 sq. yds. Drawing lumber: Re5ac 100-13 and Austin paving plans. Estimated cost 4 69,300.00 • (Portion of total paid under all • certificates on this contract.) (See .4.PR 2C20.) 20326 Paving-A8pheltic Lump s „ Contractor : "orthwest Construction Co. contrac dated Completed : r,arch 1945 6-3-44 Location: Boeing :Renton airport Type; .asphaltic concrete on Perimeter road, Bituminous surfacing on stabiliz• ed areas. Quantity: Approx. 32,000 94. yds. Drawing ;Dumber:PP��SeBac 17-X-C4 & C5 Standard C�mmomdfity�CToss?f?Cation $ 51,000.00 one I Los-ti on R Sheet 2 of`3 Asset-Property Record. 2C 19 1 • .SSET-PROPERTY RECOR (Continuation Sheet) PURCHASE INVOICE CERT. DESCRIPTION AN..O'JN T. • ORDER MD NO. NO. • (Portion of total paid under all certificates on this contract. See APR 2C20.) 20424 1 Paving-Asphaltic • Contractor : western Construction Co. • Completed : Feb. 1946 • Location: Gunnery revetment, Renton Airfield. Ty-re: 2" asphaltic concrete .uantity: . Approx. 1150 sq. yds. Drawing _:umber: SeBac 17-Y C 60. Estimated Cost t 3,784.79 (Portion of total paid .under all certificates on this contract. See APR #2C32. ) Sub-total (Airport) $ 124,084.79 Total Estitneted Cost 180,684.42 • • Standard Commodity Classification Non• 1 Lo•:tiOII R Sheet 3 of 3 Asset-Property Recol d 2C 19 • • • • RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORPORATION Final Inventory No. Office of Defense Plants-Engineering Division • Page . 13 Of 24 (Piages) LESSEE Boeing Aircraft Company, Renton Division PLANCOR NO. 156 i • , ADDRESS Renton, Washington EQUIP. LOCATION R rn i:nrt A 3 rnnrt COST PRICE Item DESCRIPTION QUAN. D,P.C. INV-NO. Cond. F.O.B. MFGR. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) 1 Concrete Paving-Airport: Approx. 207,300 02 (Estimated ) sq. yds. of 6" slab as follows : .Runway $393,154.5C - 119,900 sq. yds. , Turnarounds 17,900 sq. yds. , Apron 26,667 sq. yds. , Taxeways 36,333 sq. yds., Roadway 4,900 sq. yds. , Co:mpass Rose 1,600 sq. , yds. • 2 Approx. 100,000 sq. yds. of 6" slab ( :3s,timated) , (Cost includes drainage ) 230,070.70 3 Approx. 2300 sq. yds. of 6" reinforced 8,388.64 slab on Gunnery Revetment 4 Approx. 6000 sq. yds. of 6" slab 2L,230.00 5 Painting stripe on paving of Airport 3.,337.99 EXTRA o.r otor NE 0DadQ. and Airport Main Runway. • - ELECTRIC MOTORS FRAME SERIAL H.P. R.P.M. A°C' PHASE VOLTS CYCLE NO. NO. D.C. CONTROLS SIZE TYPE DESCRIPTION • li Estimated TOTAL COST F.O.B. MANUFACTURE TS PLANT 4657 y l D1.83. PROGRAM UNDER WHICH PAID (CONSTRUCTION OR ACQUISITION) 0011St;r„etion ii Items listed below are being shipped on this machine but are not Items listed below are missing from this machine. shown above. •: Signed • BAC Equipment Engineering , Date • Signed R.F.C. Inspection R-2150 CONTINUATION D. P. C.. INVENTORY NUMBERS FROM COLUMN 4 d • Items listed below are being shipped on this machine but are not Items listed below are missing from this machil!ne. shown above. Signed BAC Equipment Engineering Date i• Signed R.F.C. Inspection • 0114 e ..3SET—PROPERTY RECORL `_ • OF RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORPORATION Office of Defense Plants AN INSTRUMENTALITY OF THE U.S.GOVERNMENT LESSEE: BO: NG AIRCRAFT COMPANY Inventory No. {RFC/ODP Se ttle,Washington /D. P. C. P.O. No. See below Unit Paving - Concrete Dept. Plancor No. 56 Schedule II (c) Program Constr. Location See belov; Manufacture Initial Use Quotation: fob Contract Final Use Terms: Vendor: Various, see below Cat. No. & Date: Completed Acct. No. None Serial No. None Retwitix54ti See below Item Paving - concrete PURCHASE INVOICE CERT.ORDER NO. NO NO. DESCRIPTION AMOUNT . Contract plVIldG - CONCRETE ;5616 "a t ed Main Plant 8-e-41 Contractor: The Austin Co. Cost plus, fixed fee Completed: March 1943 contract. Location: Renton Leasehold Type and cuantity: Loprox. 20,600 sq. yds. 6" concrete 23,900 " " 6" ^einforce concret: I " 11, 400 " " 10" Reinforce, concret: . - Extras at Track Well : • Stairs: 6 6-step concrete stair ways, 21' long. Railings : 1200' of 3' pipe raili g Retaining "falls: 1500' at 4' • higl 510' from 0 to 4' high. • • Paving Location: Throughout plant yard areas iII • Drawing 'lumbers: Re9ac 100-13 and `ustin Paving Plans. Estimated cost $ 180,000.00 20324 Paving - concrete Lump stag con r e Standard Commodity Classification None - . • 1 Loca . on R Sheet 1. gr., 5 Asset-Property Record No. _2C 20 • r-R,I tiSET—PROPERTY RECOR (Continuation Sheet) PURCHASE INVOICE CERT. DESCRIPTION I A ORDER NO. NO. NO. 20324 Contractor: Coerig, Philp & Strand & So - Lump sum Completed: June 1945 contract dated Location: Penton Leasehold 6-9-44 Type: 6" reinforced slab Quantity: Ipprox. 48,000 sq. yds. (includes breaking of old paving, patching, etc. ) Drawing Number: Lustin k--H2, -H3, & 72 EstimFted cost $ 102,719.95 20425 Paving- Main Plant . Lump sum Contractor: Y. Fiorito Construction Co. .ontract . dated Comp l eted: ,u 7e 1946 7-11-45 Tyne: 6" reinforced slab Quantity: Approx. 1600 sq. yds. ' Drawing Number: S-X-C . 106 - Estimated cost 6,170.00 (Portion of totel paid under all certificates on this contract. ) See sheet #5 of this APR.) • • Sub-total (Main Plant) $ 288,S89.95 70005 Paving-Concrete Lump sum Contractor: `:orthwest Construction Co. contract , dated completed: December 1944 -23-43 Location: Boeing Renton l-irmort `l'yp e: 6" slab (uentity: "pprox. 207,300 sq. yds. as follows : • Standard Commodity Classification None Lo' etion R Sheet 2 of 5 • • Asset--Property'Record 2c2.0 CSET-PROPERTY RECOR!. • (Continuation Sheet) PURCHASE INVOICE CERT. DESCRIPTION • ORDER NO. NO. NO. --•-------- ---- -- Runway 119,900 Turnarounds 17,900 Apron 26,667 Taxiways 36,333 Roadway 4,900 Compass dose 12 600 207,:00 Drawing Number: ReBac 100-13 end Austin paving plans. Estimated Cust $ 393,154.50 • Paid as follows: 6003 118 ,993.86 7027 77,599.01 • 7032 47,965.14 7043 7,940.23 • 7056 7,202.02 6005 50,291.15 7096 27,385.43 7100 19,698.93 7107 8,745.33 6011 • 27,196.20 7109 Credit 930.14 7122 24,171.89 7127 46,245.45 462,454.50 Note: Above certificate payments also include $69,300.00 shown 'on /.PR #20 19. • 20326 . Pavng-Concrete • Limp sum ' Contractor: .orthwest Construction Co. • contract dated Completed: 7-:arch 1945 6-3-44. Location: Boeing Renton .ixport Type: 6" slab • Quantity: Approx. 100,000 sq. yds. Drawing Number: SeBac 17-X-C 4 & C 5. Estimated cost $ 230,070.70 (Including drdn age, etc.) Paid as follows : Standard Commodity Classification None . 1 Loca, ion R Sheet 3 of 5 • Asset—Property Record _2C 20 tr SET—PROPERTY RECOR (Continuation Sheet) --T. AMOUNT PURCHASE INVOICE CERT. DESCRIPTION ORDER NO. NO. NO. 2506 50,517.70 2520 119,092.20 2536 42,882.63 2583 51,717.10 2594 29,356.62 293.566.25 Note: Above certificate payments also includes the following: $51,000 .00 on APR #2 C19 4,100.00 on APR H2C3 8,395.55 on APR C30 20424 Paving-Concrete • Lunrm sum Contractor: '.'estern Construction Co„, cont-..act - • dated Completed: Oct. 1945 3-5-45 Location: nunnery •revetment, Renton Airport Type: 6" reinforced slab quantity: Approx. 2300 so. yds. • Drawing Number: SePac 17-X-C 60. Estimated cost $ 8,388.64 • (Portion of total paid under all • certificates on this contract. • • See APR #2032.) • 20425 Pavinw-Concrete Lump sum Contractor: Y. Fiorito Construction Co. contract • dated • Completed: J1ine 1946 7-11-45 Type: 6" slab Quantity: kprox. 6000 sq. yds. Drawing Number: Seac 17-X-C-67 & C 75, • Estimated cost ' 24,230.00 Standard Commodity Classification None • 1 Loc •.tion R Sheet 4 of 5 • Asset-Property Record 2C 20 • oa 0Z pioDaa h4Jado)J -.assd g ap g +33ys a uoT.-, °Z • • euoN uoilo)i4issoID A4ipourwo) piopuo4s • •uo4O uTi[s a r'• • a3[a'I Jo euT7 aogzeri aeuul eqq. Jo u.sou pTogaseaT-;,;o pa4.ao,oT • �uTaea aq.a.Iouoo „g Jo •sp2c •bs • 009'OZ £Taq.uTxoadde .duTpnToul • k • 8G'TG0'96 00.aodIW .tT Md uTe1:) TaO4 Push • 66'G2S'T • Ta4.o4-qns •os r,j S • • euo T sdT.z+S Txs, 80'899 Lemund uT8;r 4,IOQITv 9S TG a8Tt9 i' d8£00G sdT.z.s i79'2T9 demunU uTey; 4,Iod1Ti 92T0 • �I8T1,q ' 82000 G5'S5 pod aaq.a z,zad wod.W (2,59Z h5'pT9 90cOZ : smoTToa ss '/JuTnea uo sadT.;s q.uTad 'o0 4aa.zoaTv ZUTeoti • s.soo snoeusTTaosT y • • i7'8'2u.178`559 + ` (gzoQ.I VJ) Taq.o4.-qns •mod st 4[4 ao Z ailed uo umo;.;s 00'OL T'9,61 apnTouT osTe s .uaui.S9d aq.eoT;T�.zao anoq; :aToi1 00.00402 7 gTiZ g TTGZ 2 5'95T'SZ 989Z :smoTToa ss PTad (•4oeaquoo Jo uOTq.aod Jo uOT3eTTaouo o� anp pai[sildw0003 .ou )[som .IOj )[sore ur.zoj 44AITZTTTge4s '2UTpes2 BuTpnToul) ( •q.oe,Iq.uoo• s p4 uo se4voT.TTwao Tye .Iepun pTed Ts0oT Jo uoTq.Iod) NOI1dIM7S30 'ON 'ON 'ON 113mo 7N3D 3)IOANI 3SYH)1fnd (taays uo!lonu!4uo) IOD3d1 A1213dObd-13S'�� . I RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORPORATION • Final Inventory No. 3 Office of Defense Plants-Engineering Division Page 10. Of �a (P ges) • LESSEE Boeing Aircraft Company, Renton Division PLANCOR NO. 156 ADDRESS Renton, Washington EQUIP. LOCATION P t r rr4 rr�C�I't 1 COST PRICE Item DESCRIPTION QUAN. D.P.C. INV--NO. Cond. F.0.6. MFGR, (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) ' II. (6) 1 Sewers-Airport: Vitrified tile pipe 02 • Cost in- sanitary sower. Located from Flight cl.uded°in Service Bldg. and Guard House to City of Flight Renton Trunk' Sewer. Quantity is 200 lin. Strvice ft. of Su 'vitrified. tile pipe. 400 lin: Bldg. ft,. of 4" vitrified tile pipe. Plumbing See APR Note: As further described on APR 2C24 • 2J341 . EXTRA MACHINE ATTACHMENTS • • ELECTRIC MOTORS FRAME SERIAL H.P. R.P.M. A. :PHASE VOLTS CYCLE NO. NO, D.C. • • CONTROLS SIZE TYPE DESCRIPTION • TOTAL COST F.O.B. MANUFACTURErS PLANT • PROGRAM UNDER WHICH PAID (CONSTRUCTION OR ACQUISITION) Con;tru c t-?on - ,I r,I Items listed below are being shipped on this machine but are not Items listed below are missing from this machine. shown above. • Signed SAC Equipment Engineering Date Signed R.F.C. Inspection • R-2150 CONTINUATION Da P. C. INVENTORY NUMBERS FROM COLUMN 4 i' • II - I • • • I Items listed below are being shipped on this machine but are not Items listed below are missing from this machine. shown above. • • II • Signed BACiEquipment Engineering Date • Signed • R.F.C. Inspection • • I 0 SSET-PROPERTY RECOki) OF RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORPORATION • Office of Defense Plants • AN INSTRUMENTALITY OF THE U. S.GOVERNMENT LESSEE: B•EING AIRCRAFT COMPANY Inventory No. f RFC/ODP eattle,Washington /D• P•C• P.O. No, See Below • Unit Sewers - Plant and Airport • Dept. ?lancor N• 156 Schedule II (c) Program COnstr. location See Below • Manufactu er: Initial Use Quotation: fob • Final Use Terms: Vendor: Various, See Below Cat. No. & Date: Acct.No. None Serial No. None ' Received See Below Item Sewers - Plant & Airp• PURCHASE INVOICE CERT.ORDER NO NO. NO. DESCRIPTION • AMOUNT • • • Contrast SEWERS - PLANT • #5616 Dated The Austin Company, (Contractor) 8-8-41 '1. E. Beggs Company, (Sub-Contractor) Cost Plu fixed fe: Completed: March 1943 contract '' Type: Vitrified tile pipe sanitary sewer. Location: Effluent line from Sewage Dispos- ' Plant to oulkhead on Lake Washinc;ton, • • • and influent lines from plant loop to Sewage Disposal Plant. quantity: 270' of 24" Vit. tile pipe 1310t of 12" Vit. Tile pipe • 975' of 10" Vit. Tile Pipe Drawing Numbers: Austin M-M12 thru 21 Estimated Cost $ 6,000.00 References: Sewage Disposal Plant, APR #2C23 Drains - Storm & Sanitary, • i APR #2C6. ' 70028 S_�E: T,RS - AIRPORT. Lump Sum Contract Western Construction Co. (Contractor) dated 9/7/43 Niii4844mrPg1Mtaigivi4iNton None • 1 of 2 Asset—Property Record No._ 2C24 1 - iSSET—PROPERTY RECOR (Continuation Sheet) PURCHASE AVOICf CERT. DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ORDER NO. NO. NO. 70028 Type : Vitrified tile pipe sanitary sewer Location; From flight ,Service Bldg. and • Guard House to City of Renton Trunk sewer. Quantity: 200 lin. ft. of 8" vitrified tile pipe. 400 lin. ft. of 4" vitrified tile • pipe. • Drawing Number: Austin 44-L2 Estimated cost A1 ,000.00 (Included in. total of A11., 922.83, shown under Flight Service Building- Plumbing, APR 2 B 41 . • References: Flight Service 31dg. APR #2A8. Estimated total cost 6,000.00 • • Standard Commodity Classification 1 2 of 2 ,Asset—Property Record. 2C 24 • RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORPORATION Final Inventory. No. 3 Office of Defense Plants-Engineering Division Page 15 Of 24 • (Pages) 4 II LESSEE Boeing Aircraft Company,. Renton Division RANCOR NO. 156 I. ADDRESS Renton, Washington .EQUIP. LOCATION Fe'rto"a ngrly©„ • COST PRICE Item DESCRIPTION QUAN. D.P.C. INV-N0. cond. F.10.6. MFGR. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) 1 WATER SERVICE AND DISTRIBUTION lied.-Air ort: Supplied.p 02 (r.,st'3meted) by.l 6" main (10o0' of 6" pipe) connected to 12" ' $ 4:1,395.55 main. at Dixie Ave. and Logan St. Service line are • 14 of 2" pipe, 1300' 0 long tO Flight Service Bldg. and Apron A. and 1" pipe, 550' 0 long, cold water to ,Guard House. Includes the following valves and' • meters: 2 6" gate valves. 1 6"' ►deter, 1 6" pressur9 reducing valve. 1 1" pressure reducing valve, 1 I' pressure gauge 0-300#, 1 pressure gauge 0-200#. Those water mains also serve 4 1-1/2" fire hose 1 connections and 2 5", hydrants on Apron A. Also • includes approx. 4200 ' of 3" main from Flight EXTRA;'��Mi4 iG GCMCD1?tOF{G�OME Servioe Bldg. to Apron B, 2100' of 2" main from . Apron B to Aprons 0 and D and extension on Apron • A. Supply taken from 6" main at Flight Service • Bldg. Tater services 'include 12 1-l/2" fire hose connections and 7 drinking fountains, pedestal . type. Note: As further described on APR 2C30 ELECTRIC MOTORS • ' FRAME SERIAL H.P. R.P.M. A'C' PHASE VOLTS CYCLE NO. NO. D.C. • I CONTROLS SIZE TYPE DESCRIPTION 11 Estimated TOTAL COST F.O.B. MANUFACTURE'S PLANT PROGRAM UNDER WHICH PAID (CONSTRUCTION OR ACQUISITION) Construction I. i• fl • Items listed below 'are being shipped on this machine but are not Items listed below are missing from this machine. shown above. • Signed BAC Equipment Engineering Date Signed R.F.C. Inspection R-2150 CONTINUATION 11I D. P.C. INVENTORY NUMBERS FROM COLUMN 4 Ii • • • • • 1 • I, 11• • • li - - I 1 • I' n Items listed below are being shipped on this machine but are not Items listed below are missing from this machine. shown above. • • • Signed BAC Equipment Engineering . • Date Signed • R.F.C. Inspection 410 ASSET-PROPERTY RECOR., OF RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORPORATION • Office of Defense Plants AN INSTRUMENTALITY OF THE U. S.GOVERNMENT ESSEE: B•EING AIRCRAFT COMPANY (RFC/ODP •ttle,Washington Inventory No. /D. P.C. P.O. No. Contract • Unit 'later Service and Listributi• Dept. Plancor N. 156 Schedule II (c) Program Constr. Location 'Renton Leasehold Manufact er: Initial Use Quotation: fob' Contract • Final Use Terms: Vendor: The Austin Co. (Contractor) Cat. No.&Date: Acct. No. .Tone Serial No. 'one XiraTCi1Grlat See below Item ;'later Service and Di- .. • .n PURCHASE INVOICE CERT.ORDER NO NO. NO. DESCRIPTION AMOUNT #5 616 \IA= S MITI CE LTD DI STRI 3TTI O*T 6,_ntrec rated Contractor : The Tustin Cc. 3-3-41 • Sub-Contractor: ''1. E. Beggs Co. Completed: March 1°43 General-Layout: Distribution system con- sists of main loop, oriuinating t the valve pits, which supplies all branch circuits to all buildings. Supply: 2 12" mains to valve pits. Apr •a.. 1480'-0 of lined ane coated pipe. System capacity: 6950 gallons per minute Size cnd lengths of mains: 8" galvanized pipe 1780' -0 6" " " 410' -0 5" " " 550' -0 ?Talves and Meters: 4 12" gate valves 5 6" " " 7 5" " 9 8" " n 2 12" check valves 1 8" meter 1 5" " 1 2" pressure reducing valve-Fisher ' Standard Commodity Classification clone • 1 Li cation R Sheet 1 of 4 Asset-Property Record No. 2C 30 (o..,) • '111 t _ ASSET-PROPERTY RECORL' Y • (Continuation Sheet) PURCHASE INVOICE I CERT. DESCRIPTION - ORDER NO. NO. NO. 1 4" pressure reducing valve--c:leer 2 12" " " " -Ross Emergency Well connection: 180' 0 of 6" ' • galvanized pipe. (See APR #2C31) . Concrete valve pits: 2 pits 22' 7" x 7' 4" x 6' 0" overall with B" walls. 2 nits 15' 4".x 6' 4" x 6' 0" overall • with 8" walls. . rote: Concrete wave pits constructed by The Austin Co.. and not included in _ • this APR. , Drawing No: ReBac 0-X-1M 11 Tustin L_ 3 • • Tater :.:dins Jon leasehold) . Estimated cost 8,800.00 • •"ater Service & Distribution Estimated cost 22.274475 Sub-total A 310074.75 • Note: See PPR 2C-1-9 for water mains off • leasehold. Contra t Extension to Water Service & Distribution .#20324 Dated j Contractor: Goerig, Philp and Strt nd & Sons June 1'44 Sub-Contractor: '"rbEn Plumbing & Heating Co, Lump contra t Completed: Tune 1945 l ) General layout: System consists of 2 extensions to the 'existing water ser- vice loop. One extension serves the Cafeteria and East Shop Hldgs, and the other serves the Reclamation a dg. Supr,ly: Taken from existing 8" loop and 5" loop. Size and lengths of mains : 4" galvanized pipe 275' 0" 2" " " 800' 0" Standard Commodity Classification None ` Sheet 2 of 4 Asset--Property Record 2C 30 ocation R Ov., SSET—PROPERTY RECORL (Continuation Sheet) PURCHASE INVOICE CERT. DESCRIPTION ORDER NO. NO. NO. • Valves and meters: 5 3" u c�to valves 2 4" " 1 3" meter Drawing `:o: Re'3ac 100-16 Estimated Cost 4,000.00 • 20316 !being Aircraft Company Completed: September 1945 Installation of various sizes of surge tanks, • on the domestic water loop in issenbly, • . West Shop, and Boiler House Bldgs. Tank capacity as follows: 2 at 250 .gals. 1 " 100 " 9 " 50 " 6 " 30 " • • • 6256R 2666 . • Cost 5,397.17 70028 Contractor : 'Jestern Construction Co. Lump s Completed: December 1944 contrac dated Location : "oeing Renton 'irport 3-7-43 Supply: 1-6" main connected to 12! main at Dixie Ave. and Logan `;dater pain; L pprox. 1000 ft. of 6" pipe. Service lines: 2" pipe, 1300' 0 long to Flight ,service Bldg. , and Apron A 1" pipe, 550' 0 long, cold water to Guard Nouse. Valves end meters: • 2 6" gate valves 1 6" pressure reducing valve • 1 1" 1 Pressure r-auge 0-300# 1 " " 0-200# Standard Commodity Classification • None 1 L ation R Sheet 3 of 4 Asset—Property Recotc! 2C 30 -ASSET—PROPERTY RECORf�. (Continuation Sheet) I INVCICt au. DESCRIPTIO N Nc� NO 70028 Drawing No.: . ReBAC 17-X-M 21 • • Estimated cost �41e0.00 (Included in total of $11,922.83; shown under Flight Service Bldg., -Plumbing, APR. 23 41) Note: The above water ,uains also serves 4-1 1/2" fire hose connections and 2-5" hydrants on Anron A. (See APR 2C 11) . • 2032: ; Northwest Construction Co. (Contractor) Lunn Sum ! Completed: Larch 1945 C ontrac t • dated Scone of work: Approx. 4200'-0 of 3" main • 6-3-44 • from Flight Service Bldg. to Apron B. 2100'-0 of 2". main from Apron B to • Aprons C and D and extension on Apron A. - Supply: Take-off from 6" main at Flight Service Bldg. • Services: • 12-1 1/2" fire hose connections 7-drinking fountains, pedestal t--ne. Estimated cost .8- (Portion of total naid under all certificates on this contract. • See APR 2C20.) Total Estimated Cost ,;48,867.47 • • • Standard Commodity Classification None 1 Location R Sheet 4 of 4 • Asset- Property Record 2C 30 • RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORPORATION Final Inventory No. I 3' Office of Defense Plants-Engineering Division Page 16 Of_ 21 (Pages) Ii LESSEE Boeing Aircraft Company, .Renton Division PLANCOR NO. 156 ' II ADDRESS Renton, Washington. EQUIP. LOCATION Renton!, Airport ! COST PRICE Item DESCRIPTION QUAN. D,P,C. INV—NO, Cond. (1). (2) (3) (4) (5) F.O.(6)FGR. 1 Gunnery Revetment-Gun target structure, plank and 02 (Estimated) earth. built into embankment, dimensions 40' x 90' $42,862.96 Constructed of all new material, edncrete foo,tingE j' unCler columns. wood columns, trusses ana purlins. Ext. walls" with 30 wooed planks, center wall 1/4A steel plate both sides on columns, Ceiling 44 wood planks carrying 18* sand, Roof gable type; _.., prepared roofing on wood deck, Target 2 at 18' x 301 of 20 wood planks, Wing walls extend 75' on both sides, 9' thick, 20' to 28' high, of driven Ij pile and timber construction with dirt fill end roof, End Retaining Walls 40' long, 6' to 7' 6n • EXTRA LK91 NoAT3.qAMEhlt iliar cunbbt.ciiun to above Back nail hill slope covered With 4' of sand, anchor pile@ for rear row of columns, 4-5' x 7' sand dump shutes at ceiling•level, Culvert 4' ,. • concrete pipe 283' long with concrete headwall at each end 1 concrete manhole. Note: As further described on APR'S 2C32 ELECTRIC MOTORS I; • FRAME SERIAL H.P. R.P.M. A.C. VOLTS CYCLE NO. NO. D.C. • • .I I' • CONTROLS SIZE TYPE DESCRIPTION u • 11 • • Its Estimated TOTAL COST F.O.B. MANUFACTURE'S PLANT O2,867.91 PROGRAM UNDER WHICH PAID (CONSTRUCTION OR ACQUISITION) ' Items listed below are being shipped on this machine but are not Items listed below are missing from this machine. shown above. • • • • • Signed SAC Equipment Engineering • Date Signed I''! R.F.C. Inspection R-2150 �I, ,11 CONTINUATION D. P. C. INVENTORY NUMBERS FROM COLUMN 4 • • f Items listed below are being shipped on this machine but are not Items listed below are missing from this machine. shown above. it Signed 1 BAC Equipment Engineering Date Signed R.F.C. Inspection -, SET-PROPERTY RECORL- OF RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORPORATION Office of Defense Plants AN INSTRUMENTALITY OF THE U.S.GOVERNMENT SEE: B EING AIRCRAFT COMPANY Inventory No. I RFC-'ODP Battle,Washington 1 D. P. C. ' P.O. No. 20424 Unit Gunnery Revetment Dept. PlancorN. 156 Schedule II (c) Program0Onstr. Location 'oeina, Renton tiroort Manufactu er: Initial Use Quotation: fob Contract • Final Use Terms: lendor: Western Construction Co. (Contractor) Cat. No. & Date: Compl eted Acct. No. Tone Serial No. *'one • Atentri t Oct. 1945 Item Gunnery Revetment PURCHASE INVOICE CERT. ORDER NO NO. NO DESCRIPTION AMOUNT . • 20424 c.vT vHMO• 'T Type: • Cun target structure, plank and earth, built into einbanhznent. Size: Dimensions : 40' x 90' Clearance to Trusses: • 26' ray Dimensions: 10' x 45' Structure: :11 "Tew ?'at eri el Foun etion: Concrete footings under columns. Frame : Wood columns, trusses en purlins. Ext. Wells: 3" wood planks. Center "'all : 1/4" steel plate both sides on columns. Ceiling: 4" wood plonks carrying 18" Band Roof: Gable type; prepared roofing on woo. deck. Targets : 2 at 18' x 30' of 2" wood planks Special Features: "ling 'Tells: Extend 75' on both sides, 9' thick 20' to 28' high, of ("riven pile ni Standazor�tS,C1 fi Fb'+ion with dirt fill) e Lo tion R Sheet 1 of 2 Asset—Property Record No... 2032 .SSET—PROPERTY RECOR►. • (Continuation Sheet) • PURCHASE INVOICE CERT. DESCRIPTION AMOUNT' ORDER NO.' NO. NO. • and roof. • End Retaining Walls ; 40' long, 6' to • 7' 6" thick, 28' high, similiar construction to above. Back '`Tall : Fill slope covered with 4' of sand, anchor piles for rear ro - of columns, 4 — 5' x 7' sand dump • chutes at ceiling level. Culvert; 4' concrete pipe 263' long with concrete headwall at each en. • 1 concrete manhole. Drawing Numbers ; ReBac 17 — x — 51 , 52, 64 thru 63. • • Estimated cost 42,862.96 PP id as follows; • 2615 8,416.98 • 2626 11,262.42 2638 21,082 .50 2650 15,336.00 • 2694 3,717.27 2696 • 6,646.12 • 66,461.29 Note: Above certificate payments also includes the following: • ?1,649.00 on APR #2,16 • 300.00 " " #2891 6,975.90 " " #2A17 850.00 " " #2'92 300.00 " " #2p93 1,:;50.00 " " #2B94 3;734.79 " " #2C19 8,388.64 " " #2C20 Standard Commodity Classification None • • 1 ovation R Sheet 2 of 2 Asset- Property Record 2C 32 o.. \ �� 0 . • i _ RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORPORATION Pi Inventory No. Of .1Office of Defense Plants-Engineering Division Page 17 (Pam) . LESSEE Boeing Aircraft Company, Renton Division PLANCOR NO. 156 ADDRESS Renton, Washington EQUIP. LOCATION Renton Airport COST PRICE Item DESCRIPTION QUAN. D.P.C. INV—NO. Cond. F.O.B:MFGR. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) ( ) • 1 LIRC.R1 WT CLEARANCE: Removal of existing trans- 02 $.597,476.79 mission lines, approx. length 4 miles, between tower B22/443 ar+.i Er rlington Sub-Station and th construction of . 41 miles of nee double circus':, , 230 KV line b,itween tower B22/44S and sub-station ; between :3PA towers '45 and 46. Construction, of 1.3 miles of now single circuit 230 KV line betwodn E'arli.ngton Sub-Station and between BPA tcfivers 45 end 46. Remove 24901 of Chicago, Lill, , . St. Paul and Pan. Railroad Co. transmission line and construct 2590' of new line. Rearrange Puget ' I Scund Power 7.i mho- Co.' s anry Pacific Telc hone. EXIRAI ARI,IiN /5IA@HMEIT;SS'x kx 1 & Telegraph Co.'s transmission lines near runway. Compensation to City of Seattle for line losses and additional length of relocated line. 1 Note: As further described on A.P.R. 2C-1-1. • ELECTRIC MOTORS FRAME SERIAL H.P. R.P.M. A.G. PHASE VOLTS CYCLE NO. NO. D.C. • I CONTROLS SIZE - TYPE DESCRIPTION . .. This amount represents actual disburseneuts and does not include the outstanding commitments amounting to approximately $ 196,000.00 p • TOTAL COST F.O.B. MANUFACTURETS PLANT $ 597,476.79; PROGRAM UNDER WHICH PAID (CONSTRUCTION OR ACQUISITION) -- Construction , • ,.: : • Items listed'below are being shipped on this machine but are not Items listed below are missing from this machine. shown above. _ I / Signed I BAC Equipment Engineering ' . I .I Date Signed R.F.C. Inspection IlligL 1 1 i , 1 CONTI N p AT i,9,N,,, 1 . 1 D. P. C. INVENTORY NUMBERS FROM COLUMN 4 4 1 _ I [ 'I I, . . , I I 1 I . II, i :1 _r . , _' ' ' ' • . - : 1 . .11 r T i, 1; 1 ' . • ll 11 ,. i 1 I 1 1 II ' I P ri 1 11 , 11 ' i 1 i I I ; I 1 11 . . .7 t II '..,( i ' ': I 1 II I I i • . ,.....--'- . I 1 . . . . . l'. I . . 1• . - . . : 1 I . I i . I . ' I . . . ' . . r Items listed'below are being shipped on this machine but are not Items,listed below are missing from this machine. 1, shown above. al . 1 . 1.• 11 I i1 l' Signed BAC Equipment Engineering t 1 ' b(-:C IP:1 •,e i,z H. • ' Signed I R.F.C. Inspection i' , - . _ . - ' - 1 f. ,if k IP 411 -ASSET-PROPERTY RECOL. OF RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORPORATION • Office of Defense Plants AN INSTRUMENTALITY OF THE U.S.GOVERNMENT eSSEE: EING AIRCRAFT COMPANY Inventory No. RFC'ODP ••attle, Washington /D. P.C. P.O. No. See Below Unit Aircraft Clearance Dept. :'lancor No 156 Schedule II (C-1) Program Constr. Location Off Leasehold Manufactu r: Initial Use Quotation: fob' • • Final Use Terms: Vendor: See 'Below Cat. No. &Date: Com}�leted Acct. No. None Serial No. None . R�F.s4 Dec. 19441tem Aircraft'Clearance PURCHASE INVOICE CERT. DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ORDER NO. NO. NO. • AIRCRAFT CLEARANCE, consisting of relocation of electric power transmission lines in the vicinity of the Boeing' Renton Airport, • • as follows: Rr 0CkTI0N CITY OF SEATTLE, DEPT. OF LIGHTING DIABLOiSEATTLE • 230KV. TRANSAISSION LINE. 70020 Contractor: Bonneville Power A&ministratio etc. Removal of existing 230 KV. Transmission • lines, approximate length 4 miles, between tower B22//1<<S and Earlington Sub-station. Construction of new double circuit 230 KV line between Tower B22/44S and sub- station between BPA towers 45 and 46. • Reference: Bonneville Power Administration Drawings No. 23525 and C7088 - 344-Al Length of double circuit: 5.41 miles Right of way width: 200 ft. Towers: 31 double circuit steel towers, average span 925 ft. Conductor: 500,000 CM. Copper Design Loading: 1/211 ice, 8 lb. wind, 0°F. Construction of new single circuit 230 KV. Standard Commodity Classification • 1 1 of Asset—Property Record No._ 20-1-1 c„ I, 1 .ASSET-PROPERTY RECOk.. (Continuation Sheet) PURCHASE INVOICE CERT. l DESCRIPTION A .;NT. ORDER NO. NO. NO, line between EArlington Sub-station end new sub-station between BPL towers 45 and 46. Reference: Bonneville Power !dministretion Drawings No. 23526 end C7088--344A 1 Length of Single Circuit: 1.8 miles Right of 'Jay width: 250 feet Towers: 10 steel towers, average span 946 ft. Conductor: LCSR ^''all erd" ' Design Loading: 1/2" ice, 8 lb. wind. Cost $ 525,208.73 , Paid es follows : 70020 ' 7141 1373.69 17046 12190.05 JV-2-79 7142 392179.31 RS-13 7008 250.00 100,000 7021 10.00 7025 10.00 7035 20.00 7048 10.00 7061 10.00 100 ,001 7044 7.87 100,002 17068 30933.86 709? 2743.82 100,00 7025 5.20 100,00 . i 7029 25.30 JV--2-3.' 17035 13.62 100,00, 17044 35.94 7061 90.48 100,00: 7035 631.44 N-2- 7041 1846.15 7048 2361.06 100,00 7029 3.78 N-2-3. 7033 36.56 7061 63.26 100,00: 1 7087 1948.25 100,00• 7033 3518.02 100,01i 7054 95.10 100,01 7025 386.38 100,01. 7029 282.72 100,013 7029 6.20 100,01 7041 Standard Commodli 1LCds ification Nana ____' 7 ocF ti on I', Sheet 2 of Asset-Property Record. 2 C-1-1 • Over SSET-PROPERTY RECOR - (Continuation Sheet) • PURCHASE 1 INVOICE CERT. ORDER NO. 1 NO. NO. • DESCRIPTION AMOUNT TV-2-32 7068 32.04 100 014A I 7051 64.57 1015 7035 160.47 . 10 16 7054 I 56.25 7060 I 19.04 100,017 7054 ; • 33.48 N--2-19 7090 7.73 100,018 7044 21180.50 7034 2050.65 • 100 019 7063 3195.90 10 20 1 7044 36.36 ' 10 21 i 7074 17.08 . 10 22 7067 119.40 ' • 7101 8.54 100 023 j 7054 ?42.37 10 24 . 7059 33.63 10 25 7048 I 100.88 10 26 7090 69.30 10 27 I 7051 7.53 10 28 .70 68 52.72 10 29 7061 696.35 7060 248.04 100 030 7059 .67 10 31 i 7059 5.60 10 32 7051 .89 - 10 35 7106 89.10 10 36 7106 47.54 10 37 7106 129.99 10 39 7082 j 21.06 • 10 40 7082 71.82 100 041 7106 ; 127.61 10 42 7106 595.85 10 43 7071 3.53 10 44 7106 284.91 10 45 7074 8.00 10 46 7106 41.70 10 '"7 7071 4.59 100 048 7106 174.92 10 49 7074 15.00 10 04 7051 14.11 10 05 7061 8.41 10 07 ) 7117 i 698.07 TR.S.-J.` 49 ! Wash. j. 4376.57 TR. 300 .gash. j. 79.88 TR. 292 ";ash. 1?d j. 1375.21 TR. 292 7062 423.93 TR. 300 gash. dj. 3743.18 TR. 300 7060 3.53 TR. 305 Wash. j. 17150.67 TR. 3.05 7060 493.35 re urra e 7086 8.80 Standard Commodity Classification I ' ii 1 Sheet A<•.ct Prope•ty Record .ASSET—PROPERTY RECORL • • - • (Continuation Sheet) PURCHASE INVOICE CERT. _ + ORDER NO., NO. NO. DESCRIPTION '.V. 2-61 . J.V. 2-61 61740.00 J.V. 2-6 J.V. 2...63 1491.20 J.V. 2-•. . J.V. 2-68 563.95 J.V. 2-7 ' J.V. 2-73 (credit) • 59000.00 T.V. 2-87 J.V. 2-87 388.07 J.V. 2-8: T.V. 2-88 350.00 • J.V. 2-89 J.?t. 2-39 • 121843.44 . 70041 i 7134 6.80 • 70042 7044 3.15 . 70058 7110 4131.00 C.O. ill . 7121 1034.00 . 100,102 7048 110.04 100,103 ! 7069 j 14.36 100,105 • 7074 3616.39 100,109 7117 14.35 . 100,102 7048 14.30 647052.17 , Note: Existing B.P.J. single circuit 230 F.V. line between Ecrlington Sub- stetion and new sub-station between EPA towers 45 and 46 to be acquired b: the City of Seattle. • 70051 City of Seattle - Compensation for line losses, clearing expense, maintenance, and addi- tional length of the relocated line. J.V. 2?73 1 59,000.00 70050 RELOCATION C.r. ST. P. &. P. RR. CO. TRANS!ISSION LINE (100,000 V.)' . Contractor: Chicago, i"ilwaukee, St.Paul and Pacific Railroad Company. Removal of existing transmission lines approx. length 2490' from Shnttuck 'E t. end Runway Site. • Construction of a new line, npprox. length 2590' , south along east side of Northern Pacific Railroad right-of-way to tnd Lcross the Cedar River; thence south on =urnett Street to 4th. :venue thence west along 4th eve to Alitworth . Stre t alley; thence south to sub-sta- tion. 7070 Cost $ 12,000.00 70071 REARRKTGE PUGET SOOTTD P0' TR & LIGHT CO'S AND PACIFIC TTTLEFI07T & TTLEGR?.PH CO. LINES NE1R RUNWAY as follows: ' Standard Commodity Classification None i 1 Loc. tion R Sheet 4 of 5 Asset--Property Recorc 2C-1-1 ^SET—PROPERTY RECOR. (Continuation Sheet) PURCHASE INVOICE CERT. ORDER NO. NO NO. DESCRIPTION AMOI'NT, • . Contractor: Puget Sound Power & Light Co. Reroute existing 55 Ey. Transmission line, approx. length 970' . Instc11 400' of 2-Conductor trenchlay cable frcan Flight Service HLd$. to !Tray Cerro; and remove Holes end r.ires on :7nitworth Ave. between 'Tobin and Dixie Sts . Remove phase primary wires on Tobin Ave. and Commercial Street between Logan and • Lake Sts; and reinstall on Rainier Ave., 3rd Lye, to CcxiLrtercial Street. Re-arrange wires and cut off pole-tops .on • Tobin Ave., Logan to Lake Sts. • Remove 2 poles and move transformers on Conzrnerciel and Dixie Streets west of • Logan Street. • Rearrange Pacific Tel ephone•& Telegraph Co. wires on Tobin St. Logan to Lake St. 7115 Cost It 1 ,268.06 Line Relocation, Total Cost n 719,320.23 Standard Commodity Classification ?Tone 1 Loa tion R Sheet 5 of 5 Asset--Property Recc 2C-1-1 y •1 A t t SET-PROPERTY RECORD OF RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORPORATION Office of Defense Plants AN INSTRUMENTALITY OF THE U.S.GOVERNMENT LESSEE: B0= NG AIRCRAFT COMPANY InventoryNo. (RFC/ODP Se ttle,Washington ID. P.C. P.O.No. Contracts See below Unit Fire mains end hydrants Dept. Plancor No. 56 Schedule II (c) Program Constr. Location Renton Leasehold Manufacture Initial Use Quotation: fob Contracts Final Use Terms: Vendor: See below Cat. No.&Date: Completed Acct. No. ?Tone Serial No. "Tone itmct bras See below Item Fire mains and hydrants PURCHASE INVOICE CERT. DESCRIPTION ORDER NO. NO NO. D E S C R I P T IO N AMOUNT . Contract T'IRF r".1 rTS HYDRANTS, as follows: x5616 Dated Contractor: Austin Co. 8-8-41 Sub-Contractor: Grinnell Co. of Pacific Cost plu. Completed: rarch 1943 fixed fel p contract 10." Fire -rotection Loop. (rain Plant) Supply: City of Seattle water mains. System cm:posed of the follovri_ng: 10" cast iron pipe approx. '6000' 0 " 1550'-4 8" steel pipe " 1700'-1 6" steel pipe " •1800'-4 4" n " " 750'-4 25 hydrants, 2-way 3 " , 4-way 92 post indicator rate valves • 3 dry pipe valves 2 pressure relief valves. 65 base connections, e- ch with 75 of 1 1/2" hose on rack. 50 hose cabinets, on roof, each wi 100' of' 1 1/2" hose. • 7 hose standpipes • --ote: This loop also serves risers to sprin- kler systems in all buildings. 8" inergency Fire Protection Loop. (rain Plc t) Standard Commodity Classification r one 1 sheet 1 •��3 Asset—Property Record No._I0_ 1___ L••ation R • ,SE T-PROPERTY RECORt (Continuation Sheet) PURCHASE INVOICE CERT. DESCRIPTION A�n�UN ORDER NO. NO. NO. —__ Supply: Gasoline driven pump from Lake Washington. System is composed of the following: 8" cast iron pipe, approx. 3300' 0 6" " " " w 3700' 0" • 19 Hydrants, 2-way 3 Post indicator gete valves. Drawing No: ReT3ac 0-X-2. 25 Estimated cost A 82,730.00 2024 Extension to Fire i:ains & Hydrants, as follow= : Lump same Contractor: Goerig, Philp and Strand & contract Sons. Dated 6-9-44 Sub-Contractor: Urban Plumbing & Heatin: Co. Completed: June 1945 • 8" Fire protection loop • • Supply: 10" main fire loop System composed of following : 8" cast iron pipe 1550' 0" 6 Hydrants, 2-way 2 Hose standpipes 10 Hose connections 10 Post indicator rate valves Estimated cost 1A 15,260.00 Drawing WO: Re T3ac 0-X— 25 20326 • Fire :.'sins and Hydrants- Airport Limp sum ' Contractor: Yorthwest Construction Co. ' Contract Paten Completed: Parch 1945 6-3-44 • rote: "11 fire hydrants are served from. the domestic water line. Refer to • APR #2C30 for description of ';later Distribution System. • Standard Commodity Classification None 1 Lac= ion R Sheet 2 of 3 • Asset—Property-Record 2C 11 .11 Eit SET—PROPERTY RECOR (Continuation Sheet) PURCHASE INVOICE CERT. DESCRIPTION I AMOUNT ORDER NO. NO. NO. Total Estimated cost $ 97,990.00 Note: Including the following installations that are readily removable or salvage- able as units: 1 Pump, Pomona Pump Co. , shallow well type, 125# pressure, capacity 1000 GPT,. 1 Gear rrive, Tornson Gear and Ffg. Co. right angle type, model 39100, ratio 1.5 to 1, 112 BIT a 1750 RPM. 1 Gas engine, Climax Engineering Co., model #14235, size 6" x 7", unit #2243, complete with Twin Disc. Clutch Co. model ,-214-P 1 Clutch. Lot 1,500.00 • 48 Tiose cabinets, sheet metal constructi •n each containing 1 1.D. Allen hTg. Co. hose rack and 100' 0" of 1 1/2" unlined • hose. (fire) 2,4.00.00 2 hose Cabinets, wood construction, eac, containing 1 W.D. Allen Mfg. Co. type S.A. hose rack and 100' 0" of 1 1/2" unlined fire hose. • • 90.00 75 Hose racks, .D. Allen :.fg. company ' each with 75' 0" of 1 1/2" unlined • • fire hose. 1,975.00 Total I (readily reTovables) $ 5,965.00 " • • Standard Commodity Classification NCa® . Loe =tion R Sheet 3 of 3 • Asset—Property Record _ 20 11 • • RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORPORATION Final Inventory No. 3 Office of Defense Plants-Engineering Division • Page 18 Of r59. (Pages) LESSEE _ Boeing Aircraft Company, Renton Division PLANCOR NO. 156 ADDRESS Renton, Washington EQUIP. LOCATION `F2�v2t.or 4lrnort Item DESCRIPTION QUAN. D.P.C.INV—NO. Cdnd. COST PRICE F.O.B. MFGR. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) 1 C0;`,iM>6,i CIAL WATERWAY. BULKHEAD - Airport: 02 0.1,739.0C (Rebuilding of existing bulkhead) Constructed of wood piles on 6 ' centers In two rows 14 r 6" apart; back under- ground row connected by 4 x 12 braces to front row, front row backed by 4 x 12 planking and topped with barbed wire outriggers. EXTRA MACHINE ATTACHMENTS • • • • ELECTRIC MOTORS FRAME SERIAL • H.P. R.P.M. A.C. VOLTS CYCLE NO. NO. D.C. • CONTROLS SIZE TYPE DESCRIPTION • TOTAL COST F.O.B. MANUFACTURErS PLANT ! 11,739.0C PROGRAM UNDER WHICH PAID (CONSTRUCTION OR ACQUISITION) Construction Items listed'below are being shipped on this machine but are not Items listed below are missing from this machine. shown above. • Signed BAC Equipment Engineering Date Signed R.F.C. Inspection R-2150 it CONTINUATION Da P. C. INVENTORY NUMBERS FROM COLUMN 4 ' I ' I Items listed below are being shipped on this machine but are not Items listed below are missing from this machine. shown above. Signed BAC Equipment Engineering Date Signed R.F.C. Inspection • ;' • RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORPORATION Final Inventory No Office of Defense Plants-Engineering Division Page 19 Of__ p4 I(F,ages) LESSEE _ Boeing Aircraft Company, Renton Division PLANCOR NO. 156 j, ADDRESS Renton, Washington EQUIP. LOCATION e,-,t0 , Airport I i; Item DESCRIPTION • QUAN. D.P.C. Cond. bST PRICE F.O.B. MFGR. (1) (2) (3). (4) ' (5) I 'I (6) 1 LAXE WASHINGTON BULKHEAD -Airport: 02, 1:2,259.50 Constructed of wood piles on 61 centers in . two rows 141 dig° apart; back underground ll. rowconnected by 4 x 12 braces to front .i row; front row, backed by 4 x" 12 planking , and topped "with barbed wire outriggers, including riprap. Length is 7401 . il ,I. • 4 li I. 1 ' • EXTRA MACHINE .ATTACHMENTS ' ' !I li. 11 I II li Il li . i I I ELECTRIC MOTORS FRAME SERIAL H.P. R.P.M. A. :PHASE VOLTS CYCLE I NO. NO. D.C. : I i . ) I,, • II • II' II, CONTROLS • . ;i SIZE TYPE DESCRIPTION �' . . ii. • I .411 ii TOTAL COST F.O.B. 'MANUFACTURE S PLANT ,NpI yp,59.3r • . PROGRAM UNDER WHICH PAID (CONSTRUCTION-OR ACQUISITION) Construction II. , i 1 Ill I. Items listed below are being shipped on this machine but are not Items listed below are missing from this machine. shown above. tl i 1 i II, I lI Signed • V ' BAC Equipment Engineering I. Date Signed R.F.C. Inspection ' i II 2150 1 CONTINUATION • De P. C., INVENTORY NUMBERS FROM COLUMN 4 • • . I it II Items:listed below are being shipped on this machine but are not Items listed below are missing from this machine. shown above. I Signed RAC Equipment Engineering Date Signed • R.F.C. Inspection — q III . RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORPORATION ' -Final Inventory No. 1 '11,3 Office of Defense Plants-Engineering Division Page 20 Of_ �sl'/l" . l rjllag a s) ;i. . LESSEE _ Boeing Aircraft Company, Renton Division PLANCOR NO. 156 i! ADDRESS Renton, Washington EQUIP. LOCATION T.'''�i ,� t QC3rJiCe . Building Item DESCRIPTION QUAN. D.P.C. INV—NO. Cond, COST PRICE F.O,B. MFGR. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) 1 Air Compressor, 100 C. ' I C; 100 PSI, 1 80005-1 02 1903.00 Ingersoll-Rand, Motor Compressor, Model ;!, 25-13, '-with Texropo drive belts and !N: pulleys, motor base, but less motor. . < ,, EXTRA MACHINE ATTACHMENTS i, ', 2 Air Receiver, R-4, 24r" x 6' ASME, 1. 80005-2 '.30.00 complete with safety valve, gage, and c ii drain valve. 3 Aftercooler, Ingersoll-Rand, #7-PL-12, 1 80005A-1 ,H1222.00 including safety valve, gauge, drain piping, fittings and automatic condensate . trap. l - ELECTRIC MOTORS ,;' FRAME SERIAL H.P. R.P.M. D.D. PHASE VOLTS CYCLE NO. NO.• , III . a G I d' CONTROLS , SIZE ' TYPE • DESCRIPTION i • • ., ii TOTAL COST F.O.B. MANUFACTURES PLANT e1,255.00 PROGRAM UNDER WHICH PAID (CONSTRUCTION OR ACQUISITION) Acquisition Items listed'below are being shipped on this machine but are not Items listed below are missing from this machine, shown above. iiI jl . i1 • II 11 !F. V Signed I!' BAC Equipment Engineering • . I, Date Signed - R.F.C. Inspection R-2150 . iu CONTINUATION D. P. C. INVENTORY NUMBERS FROM COLUMN 4 h { Items listed below are being shipped on this machine but are not Items listed below are missing from this machine. shown above. Signed I'I BAC Equipment Engineering Date Signed R.F.C. Inspection i�, RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORPORATION Final Inventory No. Office of Defense Plants-Engineering Division Page 21 Of 24 (Pages) LESSEE _ Boeing Aircraft Company, Renton Division PLANCOR NO. 156 ADDRESS Renton, Washington EQUIP. LOCATION .) Bu.i:l-ding Item DESCRIPTION QUAN. D.P.C. INV—NO. Cond. COST PRICE (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) o.B,6g��x '.ea lo, 1 Electric L otor, Used, Westinghouse, 1 80006 .1 .E2 060.00 completely rebuilt and guaranteed. • • • • • EXTRA MACHINE ATTACHMENTS 2 Contactor, Cutler-Hammer, Bulletin 1 02 28.80 9586, size 2, 440 volt, magnetic ,across- the-line, complete with push button station. ELECTRIC MOTORS FRAME SERIAL H.P. R.P.M. A:C.: D. PHASE VOLTS CYCLE NO. NO. 25 1800 AC 3 440 G0 Westinghouse Electric Co. . CONTROLS SIZE TYPE DESCRIPTION • TOTAL COST F.O.B. I FjQ, T�s,�} §6bEt {T PROGRAM UNDER WHICH PAID (CONSTRUCTION OR ACQUISITION) e0£attlQ,, WAcq uicitiOn • Items listed'below are being shipped on this machine but are not Items listed below are missing from this machine. shown above. • Signed BAC Equipment Engineering Date Signed R.F.C. Inspection R-2150 • CONTINUATION D. P. C. INVENTORY. NUMBERS FROM COLUMN t I II • • • • • ICI I it Ills 1 � I I I , � I f I I I I I it II I I � I , Items listed below are being shipped,on this machine but are not Items listed below are missing from this machlse. shown above. I I I it ' Signed I I BAC Equipment Engineering 1 Date • - Signed III • R.F.C. Inspection Ili . • . • . ;ji. .. RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORPORATION ' . Final Inventory NO.' i !i-3 ' ' Office of Defense Plants-Engineering Division Page ,.."2 Of .ed"?.. 11-iges) . .. • ' . 11 LESSEE Boeing Aircraft Company, Renton Division , PLANCOR NO. ' 156 . ,ADDRESS Renton, Washington • EQUIP. LOCATION vi., 1,A 0.e•mfif,e • -,..ev Bldg,•1,- cbsT PRICE F Item , . DESCRIPTION QUAN. D.P.C. INV-NO.• cond. 0 ..O.B. MFGR. ' •(1) . • (2) (3) (4) (5) i1 (6) . . 1 Transmitter, Northern Radio, Model 388-C: 1 80016-2 02 . 01735.00 Crystal control ; Model D-104; output 250 Watts for operation on a120 volt, single 80019-1 phase, 60 cycle supply. 80019-2 1. 2 Model SX-28 Skyrider Receivers, cabinet 4 80019-3 '' 686.00 mounted, 120 volt, single phase, 60 cycle 80019-4 • ! .1! • 3 Model S-22 Skyrider Marine Receivers, 2 80019-5 • • ' , 146,02 li, cabinet mounted, 120 volt, single phase, • 80019-6 . . d 60 cycle. . • • ! .,d 4 Miller Type 7845 Radio Interference Filter 1 80019-7 • i ',: 20.58 5 Receiver, Console Table 2 ' 80030-1. • . ' . 80030-2 ,I • E. m Stand ' i 80030-3 • ETRe fRE-PITi'M'AcgiWig.ot , • , i;,!, - . ! 1! , . .1! . . . - . : • . . ! . ,• 1 . •I • . ELECTRIC MOTORS FRAME SERIAL A.C. I i , o NO - .1. H.P. R.P.M. PHASE ,VOLTS1 CYCLE D.C. O. • , ;1, . , .. . • ' 1 I.. . . i . . . .. 1 • • ,, CONTROLS . . . . ! v SIZE TYPE . DESCRIPTION 1 • ..1„ I.' • .i. • ,. . . " • • , i ' . • • II . . TOTALCOST F.O.B. MANUFACTURETS PLANT !1""'. 134.65 ; PROGRAM UNDER WHICH PAID (CONSTRUCTION OR- ACQUISITION) ACCIniSit4.0n 11H o• • , I 1' • . . .• . .. Items listed telow are being shipped on this machine but are not Items listed below are missing from this mach'inr:e. shown above. 80046-1 Lamp assembly-traffic 1,11: , . control . ,• , • 4 The above item Shown on page 24 ., •,,. of 24. Signed ' 11 . 'I.. BAC Equipment Engineering 4 . . . : f ,, Date . : Signed flI R.F.C. Inspection 111' i R-2150 . . II CONTINUATION D. P. C. INVENTORY NUMBERS FROM COLUMN 4 I 1I'I II li " Items listed below are being shipped on this machine but are not Items listed below are missing from this machine. shown above. ' I Signed RAC Equipment Engineering Ili Date Signed R.F.C. Inspection i \ b; RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORPORATION - ' - - Final Inventory Near I {; 3 l Office of Defense Plants-Engineering Division Page 23 Of 24 (rages) I', LESSEE _ Boeing Aircraft Company, Renton Division PLANCOR NO. 156 ADDRESS Renton, Washington • EQUIP. LOCATION z.?e,ZF }7, Airport ' , • Item DESCRIPTION QUAN: D.P.C. INV—NO. Cond. CC!ST PRICE F.,O.B. MFGR. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) . IG (6) 1 5/$" x 96tP #9438 Hubbard Copperweld 30 80011-1 024',;:, 47.76 Ground Rods thru i' 80011-30 1 2 #6592 .Hubbard Ground Rod; Clamps 30 80011 5.82 3 (1500. 't. ) #10 Soft Drawn Bare Copper Wire 43 lbs. 80012-1, ..12.12 4 Installation charges on Radio Equipment '80031 • • 904.44 5 Installation charges on Emergency Radio 80048A 714.85 System .II EXTRA MACHINE ATTACHMENTS , it y, ELECTRIC MOTORS - FRAME SERIAL H.P. R.P.M. D.c.PHASE VOLTS CYCLE NO. NO. D.C, it • I . • '1,, , • CONTROLS SIZE • TYPE DESCRIPTION li . J y, :l 1p TOTAL COST F.O.B. MANUFACTURETS PLANT PROGRAM UNDER WHICH PAID (CONSTRUCTION OR ACQUISITION) Acvisit�Sovi 1 . I {I • Items listed'below are being shipped on this machine but are not Items listed below are missing from this machine. shown above. __ . il i. , • Signed ', BAC Equipment Engineering J Date 'Signed R.F.C. Inspection jl, R-2150 - �1I • it CONTINUATION' D. P. C. INVENTORY NUMBERS FROM COLUMN 4 ail III .I 'I Ill • ' I { • Items listed below are being shipped on this machine but are not Items listed below are missing from this mach tie. shown above. Signed BAD Equipment Engineering !II Date Signed R.F.C. Inspection I . • RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORPORATION - Final Inventory No.; Ih 3 • Office of Defense Plants-Engineering Division Page 24 Of (Pages) Iu LESSEE _ Boeing Aircraft Company, Renton Division PLANCOR NO. 156 Ii! II, ADDRESS_ Renton, Washington EQUIP. LOCATION 1'?An+.4„-1. Alvnnrt COST PRICE Item DESCRIPTION QUAN. D.P.C. INV—NO. cond. F.0.6. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) . !I �;x RFnn . 1 AIR TRAFFIC SIGNAL-Airports Used for 1 80046-1 ,b1.87 Blinker Signals from control tower to , ; In aircraft, dimensions are 14" long x. 9" I'' diameter, including 1 50 va, 60 cycle, ;i.' 1 ph. , 115/7 v double wound transformer i with attaching cord. • • j I il III EXTRA MACHINE ATTACHMENTS I• II . . f ill I I j, ELECTRIC MOTORS FRAME SERIAL H.P. R.P.M. A'C' PHASE VOLTS CYCLE 16 NO. NO. D.C. . . I, •I' CONTROLS II SIZE TYPE DESCRIPTION • Ih !fi TOTAL COST F.O.B. 16 Xiatl¢2 ,5 PLANT P;'91 .87 Renton j��, PROGRAM UNDER WHICH PAID (CONSTRUCTION OR ACQUISITION) A rip i /Ai ti on u I, ' t Items listed'below are being shipped on this machine but are not Items listed below are missing from this machines. shown above. - IF i l • I,I 11 • li. • it Signed ii' BAC Equipment Engineering ' II; li Date Signed II R.F.C. Inspection l R-2150 CONTINUATION D. P. C. INVENTORY NUMBERS FROM COLUMN 4 I',I ,II I II • • • • 11 Items listed below are being shipped on this machine but are not Items listed below are missing from this machine. shown above. Signed RAC Equipment Engineering Date Signed R.F.C. Inspection 4 e_ h renton municipal airport and will rogers - wiley post memorial seaplane base master plan report Air a prepared for city of renton _, _ by Vtl'li Washington CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO . 2984 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON PROVIDING FOR APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS . WHEREAS the CITY OF RENTON., WASHINGTON has heretofore received certain excess revenues in excess of estimated revenues for the calendar year 19 75 , and WHEREAS it is necessary and advisable to appropriate and transfer from such excess revenue into the belowmentioned fund( s) for the purpose of implementing the City of Renton, Airport Master Plan and evidencing the grants made by the FAA and Washington State Aeronautics Commission, • and such appropriation being necessary and in the public interest and for the public benefit , NOW THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF. THE CITY OF RENTON DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS : SECTION I : The Director of Finance°' is hereby authorized and directed to provide for the following appropriation and transfer: FROM: Excess Revenue $ 50 , 000 . 00 UNTO: Airport Account No. 402/15 . 534. 90 . 63. 01 $50 , 000 . 00 -1- - SECTION II : This Ordinance shall -be effective upon its passage , approval and five days after its publication , unless otherwise provided for hereinabove. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 17th day of November , 1975 4/ 4} a. 72z a.c( Delores A. Mead L , City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 17th day of November ., t975 Ct eery Garrett , Mayor Approved as to form: /(fer':; Ger rd M. Shellan , City Attorney Date of Publication: 11-21-75 -2- rncster olcn stucy I . for renton municiocl i t cir � r � 0 anc wU - wiley oost memorici secocne ocse lII , 11 february 1978 I , prepared for city of renton , washington 1 _ prepared by vtn washington, inc . vtn consolidated, inc . vtlit 2301 Campus Drive P.O-Box C-19529 Irvine,CA 92713—(714) 833-2450 Engineers • Architects • Planners TWX: 9 1 0-59 5 1 534 VTN OR IRIN February, 1978 Mr. Del Bennett Airport Director Renton Municipal Airport Municipal Building • ; 200 Mill Avenue South • Renton, Washington 98055 ! i Dear Mr. Bennett: VTN is pleased to submit this final Technical Report on the master plan study for the Renton Municipal Airport and the contiguous Will Rogers- - Wiley Post Memorial Seaplane Base. This report has been prepared in compliance with the contract provisions for this study and incorporates the relevant sections as outlined in Federal Aviation Administration guidelines. We trust that this report will materially benefit all planning agencies and departments in your region and will insure the continued utilization of these two excellent aviation facilities. VTN appreciates the cooperation of the various departments and agencies that have furnished data, guidance and advice during the course of this study and would like to extend our thanks to the many staff members who have helped us. Sincerely yours, VTN CONSOLIDATED, INC. Stephen L. Allison Director, Airport Planning Li mm II_ The preparation of this document was financed in part through a Master Planning Grant from the DOT/ FAA under the Planning Grant Program, as provided in the Airport and Airway Development Act of 1970. The contents of this document reflect the views of the staff of VTN Consolidated, Inc. , Irvine, Cali- fornia which is responsible for certain parts and accuracy of the data herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or the policy of the FAA. Acceptance of this report by the FAA does not in any way constitute a commitment on the part of the United States to participate in any development depicted herein nor does it indicate that the proposed development is environmentally acceptable in accordance with Public Laws 91-190, 91-258 and/or 90-495. This study is also partially funded by a grant from the Washington State Aeronautics Commission who were also responsible for the preparation of the base maps used in this master plan. ' II it • • U a ren on ciroort ! m c sic r ocn stucy • f: n �• .dam,. _ 11 li - l , i TABLE OF CONTENTS .Page CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION L I CHAPTER II FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 5 CHAPTER III BACKGROUND 9 CHAPTER IV CURRENT AIRPORT CAPACITY 25 ' CHAPTER V AIR TRAFFIC FORECASTS 36 CHAPTER VI FACILITY REQUIREMENTS 57 CHAPTER VII DEVELOPMENT ALTERNATIVES 66 CHAPTER VIII AIRPORT PLANS 88 CHAPTER IX COSTS AND FINANCING 110 CHAPTER X ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES 128 LIST OF FIGURES Page III-1 AIRPORT VICINITY 11 III-2 EXISTING AIRPORT LAYOUT 14 III-3 PERCENTAGE OF AIRCRAFT BY TYPE 22 III-4 PERCENTAGE OF AIRCRAFT BY PRIMARY USE 23 111-5 AVERAGE:_ANNUAL .HOURS -FLOWN PER AIRCRAFT 24 IV-1 EXISTING AIRSPACE REQUIREMENTS OF AREA AIRPORTS 30 IV-2 INSTRUMENT APPROACHES TO RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT 32 IV-3 LOCATION OF AIRCRAFT PARKING AREAS 34 V-1 AIRCRAFT OWNERSHIP RATE. UNITED STATES, COUNTY OF KING AND RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT 41 V-2 UNSATISFIED DEMAND FOR BASED AIRCRAFT AT RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT 42 V-3 NATURAL GROWTH OF BASED GENERAL AVIATION AIRCRAFT 44 V-4 UNCONSTRAINED FORECAST OF BASED GENERAL AVIATION AIRCRAFT 46 V-5 FORECAST OF BASED AIRCRAFT CONSTRAINED BY AIRPORT FACILITIES 47 VII-1 SUGGESTED SEAPLANE BASE LAYOUT FOR ALTERNATIVES 2 AND 3 76 VIII-1 AIRPORT LAYOUT PLAN 91 VIII-2 APPROACH AND CLEAR ZONE PLAN 95 VIII-3 APRON C ALTERNATE USAGE WITH GENERAL AVIATION T-HANGARS 100 VIII-4 MODIFIED AIRPORT LAYOUT PLAN - POTENTIAL ULTIMATE CONFIGURATION 106 VIII-5 AIRPORT LAND USE PLAN • 108 1 VIII-6 AIRPORT VICINITY LAND USE PLAN 109 IX-1 LOCATION OF MAJOR DEVELOPMENT ITEMS 117 ii LIST OF TABLES Page III-1 HISTORIC AND FORECAST GROWTH OF POPULATION IN KING COUNTY AND THE UNITED STATES 15 III-2 HISTORIC POPULATION CITY OF RENTON 16 [ ( t-3 AEROSPACE EMPLOYMENT IN THE PUGET SOUND REGION 18 III-4 COMPARISON OF PER CAPITA PERSONAL INCOME IN PUGET SOUND AND THE UNITED STATES 19 III-5 HISTORICAL AIRCRAFT ACTIVITY AT RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT 21 IV-1 EXISTING CAPACITIES OF AIRCRAFT STORAGE AREAS RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT 33 V-1 SUMMARY OF AVIATION FORECASTS RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT 38 V-2 AIRCRAFT INVENTORY RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT JULY 1975 48 V-3 SEAPLANE FORECAST RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT 49 V-4 EXISTING AND FORECAST FLEET MIX RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT 50 V-5 GENERAL AVIATION OPERATIONS PER BASED AIRCRAFT RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT 52 V-6 ITINERANT AND LOCAL OPERATIONS 54 V-7 INSTRUMENT OPERATIONS RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT 55 V-8 BUSY HOUR OPERATIONS RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT 56 VI-1 APRON AND T-HANGAR REQUIREMENTS RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT 59 VI-2 AUTOMOBILE PARKING REQUIREMENTS RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT 65 VII-1 COMPARISON OF DEMAND AND CAPACITY O.F AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT ALTERNATIVES 1995 80 VII-2 COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVE AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT PLANS 84; I5(-1 DEVELOPMENT COST ESTIMATES AND SCHEDULE 113 LIST QF TABLES (Continued) Page [X-2 PROJECTIONS OF OPERATING REVENUES AND EXPENSES 121 IX-•3 PROJECTED CASH FLOW ANALYSIS (THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) 127 • iv ,-- Introcuction mr.o..P49 WAt The Rento.n Muncipal Airport on the south shore of Lake Washington has been providing service to the aviation community in the Renton area for the past 50 years. Originally a short turf strip, the airport has been developed through the years as an important transportation center in the Puget Sound region. Partially responsible for this role is the seaplane activity which for years has operated adjacent to the airport in the area which is now named the Will Rogers-Wiley Post Memorial Seaplane Base. As the airport has grown, it has been instrumental to the development of a sound economy in the Renton area. It is the City's opinion that further airport improvements are now needed. To create a plan for such improvements, an Airport Master Planning Study, funded jointly by the Federal Aviation Administration, the Washington State Aeronautics Commission, and the City of Renton, Washington, for Renton Municipal Airport was initiated. The objective of this study was to develop a plan for providing 2 the necessary facilities to best accommodate the aviation needs of the airport and contiguous seaplane base over the next 20 years. The problems associated with the impact on the shoreline and adjacent environment, those related to the Boeing Aircraft Company's use of the field and the potential for instru- mentation of the runway were to be specifically addressed. The scope of work consisted of the following major tasks: . Inventories . Forecasts of Aviation Demand ▪ Demand/Capacity Analyses . Facility Requirements . Airport Layout Plans and Land Use Plans . Development Staging and Costs . Financial Plans . Environmental Impact Assessment Report Findings of the study are documented in three reports : an Executive Summary port, which briefly highlights the conslusions; an Environmental Impact Assessment Report, describing potential effects on the environment; and this , the Technical Report, which details all methodologies and presents the support- ing material justifying the conclusions of the study. The remainder of this report includes nine chapters : . Chapter II - summarizes the findings and recommendations of the study. . Chapter III - describes the historical development of the airport, the socioeconomics characteristics of the surrounding area, and historical aviation activity at the airport. . Chapter IV - discusses the factors which limit the capacity of the airport and identifies existing capacity levels. 3 . Chapter V - presents forecasts of aviation activity unconstrained by capacity and concludes with projections of activity given the capacity limits. . Chapter VI - identifies facilities required to meet the projected activity levels. . Chapter VII - discusses alternative airport development concepts . . Chapter VIII - gives the recommended plan for future airport development, including the airport layout plan, land use plans, FBO area plans, and "Part 77" plans. . Chapter IX - presents a schedule of proposed develop- ment, an estimate of development costs , and a generalized financing plan. . Chapter X - summarizies the environmental issues dis- cussed in detail in the Environmental • Impact Assessment Report. 4 2 fincngscnc rccomncndctlons Lased upon the material that has been gathered, analyzed and prepared in this master plan study, the long term development of aviation facilities at Renton Municipal Airport and the contiguous Will Rogers - Wiley Post Memorial Seaplane Base can be accommodated. These two facilities are fullfilling the mission assigned to them, and can continue to do so over the forecast period. They play an important role in the overall airport network for the Puget Sound region, and will continue to be an important component for that network over the next twenty years. Specific findings relative to Renton. Municipal Airport, and the Will Rogers - Wiley Post Memorial Seaplane Base are given below: FINDINGS 1 . Renton Municipal Airport is developed almost to capacity. 2. Seaplane activity is accommodated on the airport and does not have its 6 own identifiable facility. 3. There is substantial demand for airport/seaplane base space within the region served by the airport. 4. The ability of Renton Municipal Airport to satisfy this demand is limit- ed by the physical constraints of the site. r 5. The character of general aviation flying at Renton will continue its slow shift from pleasure flying to business flying over the next twenty years. 6. Most improvements that can be made to the airport are "fine tuning" of design features to increase capacity, improve efficiency or enhance safety. 7. The installation of a microwave landing system in the future is possible; however, the landing minimums are limited by high terrain west of the field. 8. Unrestricted auto access to the aircraft operating areas needs to be , controlled. 9. The use of Boeing Apron C space for parking of additional general aviation aircraft would increase the capacity of the field. 10. The relocation of Taxiway A closer to the runway would gain approx- imately 80 aircraft parking spaces. 11 . The environmental impacts of new development are minimal for the airport. 12. The most adverse environmental impact for the airport is associated,with the jet engine testing facilities in Boeing Area A. 13. The costs of development of the airport and seaplane base are approx- imately $1 ,620,000. RECOMMENDATIONS 1 . It is recommended that the improvements for the Renton Municipal Airport and the Will Rogers - Wiley Post Memorial Seaplane Base be adopted as presented in this Master Plan Report. 7 2. It is recommended that all short-term improvements given in this Master Plan Study be implemented by 1982. 3. It is recommended that the Boeing Company further investigate ways to mitigate the noise associated with the engine testing facilities. 4. It is recommended that this Master Plan Study be continually reviewed and updated as needed to take advantage of increased technological im- provements, to confirm forecasts and to review the standards associated with airport development. 8 3 ,,:,,". ....,...„:::,:;:..,..., oackgrouno . 4„..........::.::....,.....t. •1.1......:,,, „......,...:...:.,.,F..:,....... '4.- - --i:••••::::'::•••'!:•::',. \ la r:' (':4i,"••': 1.1,41 •--ia-r:: ' 1::1,: 'c,'..,*...s,.*:'• i* , • ctoljAik %-'•••.'• '' .0.:" . -re, • • It.1::•;-.........•••••• .;;;).. -1:01(•1 V•r:;re.•••••••:: (14,••‘: :4--..:. ': '':;•.'.'FS.•••••"tt•ro->' , I ; , Renton Muncipal Airport and the contiguous Will Rogers-Wiley Post Memorial Seaplane Base are general aviation facilities located in northern Renton on the south shore of Lake Washington. ) The airport serves the City of Renton as well as other nearby communities in western King County such as Seattle, Tukwila, Bellevue, and Mercer Island. Figure III-1 shows the re- lation of the airport to other transportation facilities and existing land uses in the area. The Boeing Aircraft manufacturing facilities border the airport to the east. Light industrial and commercial uses adjoin the airport to the south and west. 1 For convenience throughout this report, the airport and seaplane facilities will together be referred to as Renton Municipal Airport. 10 FIGURE III-1 AIRPORT VICINITY r Ern.7- `,,, lTI►"`all-7. it . Ih�,•�•���yy��/��@/�j� .. 33 �:--- ))��Ilppgg ; 4111. Ir 52. I,nrur I�EI. 1u,,,. �aFl � f,L�1n11r1�/� `\�� r - �:[ �n:R.��1� 710- °,�Innc �uur� t`y�7ya e,Il1A \ �! �• j '4 I Illmut►�aI �,t ���i�t^^��11,, e1\ ` • � k� 'y i� tlggr w tL y:)� �jj11 v ��liiilli 1`• ?" •çiui ? I,Ot� e le `,MERCER ISLAND Ii •'i: r (�i)\,\I6 np il, A11114 ',�„ 1 "� ,� r b�� , } � ,��1/, (/� 11! :l • ...l�Q 4ilrA ts, >R or-.e .. a (/ t'(�'��!,r��i » t@�"''i0t d `1 ti+ ��C � �.:e S���/ b.j,; ' *ØI! r Ust I j �1 ' ! i I r :r�TY: 'fr L,. - .\1 f \ttk �c�p'.- 01 '`.1 �` ' `•Y• KING COUNTY I i 1 i�� I 1 it , ; elf. '•.i�s.\ `,..INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 'ggpp �� i.>°�11{l1 1)1 rj�l �r {r 1, �" y� i if (6DEING FIELD) `!� �; `i ,/:.':. rcg.,ct:--,44,t1,,;_:okHi:c\L, I '�al� 0' ,\ i�` ' si r'; - r r rbI'��7 :. ,,,_, . \S ; :. - rif` a\� ,,. LAKE' r� �S I� l ''�s+��W1 o- , � �G. ••• ;i• WASHINGTON i ,� j9�`�YT �y :� � � Iii'k., 1 .......113.-;-_-•., •1•133..':.\'• \'ir..t. ift: ,,,.„,,,-• '• -,,,, , s_o., ... .4 _ A ilk,. f 1 -.\,„,\"v�oQ' 1.1 � (, I �"`rek:!%� '.r�'� k, Y)71i d�� � ) 1-...inane _ �;� •`s„ f��Pr 7 k-*:,, '' V .� BURLINGTON NORTHERN 144 �R it �� 9jll�ldsl r��9 `s rr, �� ', i, `� .'1 sew lA0L1 134 11P�t►`* ti le .,�,t RAILROAD . 1 I, I 1 •� � �'./1 AIi'� i1&......„ • lit*. m' 'b ^rr,.,,,- ;y�, ..-yn,,i• .iL l� �{`� �7 7, i o .ram '�. 4►1ft* ` REit 1 l WILL RORSWILEY POST•"iiii a MEMORIAL SEAPLANE BASE I "„b' ' iilk%:',:;' 7;2:;:1131-114.111 i%.l eir •:+ � �I�st1 11 tivq a {� 'i� �dRl1� �, � .,;•• .P {'17.t _x� ,; t .( '6Kii4 '' '+ rir-`... 5L �, \ 1� III!!C""r QI' j`.•A4� ' 1 1 vJVtIttR. 'l11 f �Mtf .1\ "' lT,'er -t%/OSw�\Si °�t. 7�R�i '' 1 !!� 7 .^ti�'.� ,.\ ;'.. aSi }Vitq�p`A1\italiitiA.Y 16.E ; lG i1 ii r!7,1 ) `*JEN RENTON �I eits.„� 1, 3 ^ IL, 1 1\QIr.El1���� 9\1r, , JlliN.. , 1 4'� �;7;1 r - +�. - 1+`alta�l�', iJ111 cue CHICAGO,MILWAUKEE � r:r� e�-In�jl ailYr� ',�, 'a� ->;' i 1/°?ie`� i' STitatcrsat .PAUL&PACIFIC i" —.� %41,$��I"� 1; "` 'A �l��l ai:' "' �'(�L HL%,/ CEDAR RIVER voea �, y ooq ,- r, I Rif.. ., raara RAILROAD / rl 1 .s f"sr � �'iilfi 4w/�r^S. � '���1j,\`" � po .'-� ��r�� P,�� f a 't4 t �t v'd,��gl�� g P "baill�3 �-�^.�_It .d�, � ,o 1� N.- ,I V 1, !!�j -r.��' �, ft �}J�►v4.t .t t • l 11, 1'1� R a\ �r�. r` ,, iL m..—�i.r�I,1, zt a4 `..w, s�i i _` i .. . I k. N iita .4 I �j r��"�, R '.,• 1, ) ► ,tamit 6..I+iov --;� : I I a .mar �I� citari1= / •', [ill II'l iJ3 6 Bins . ;rr t;,-y; ` c n' \-.. . 111t\77� 4.61b. �@ '1•••< "':/lii.Iliiiii i'--gir sW�r~A a —. -0, ), I . , ,t ee` );, f ': :i: 17 . ,— ,K1, SEATTLE—TAC• r . �. • hr.�: I `�If'��f:Y,I , -A' ,','_ N INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT d r. 1 ,' 1 a r� ��" `�I-',V ' �.i l 1 '' -I 1. 1 �+��i+I r.�V i1C�yI11 I� • __ r.,4 t t,_.- ce .,. I o�,`J;�Jt�Y`,. _t ,I• 1�f,,Af,, r• �. ��� , df:.F. r `,irk^,' 1���1 ❑' • tl -': it1 y 1 v r... _:�n - ia—L-mw. .4 11 The northwest corner borders a single-family residential area. Major high- ways serving the airport are State Routes 167 to the west and 900 to the south and Interstate 405 two miles south of the airport. HISTORICAL AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT The present site of the Renton Municipal Airport was originally a narrow finger of ground bounded by a swampy area of Lake Washington, the Cedar River, and the Black River which drained Lake Washington to the Duwamish River and finally Puget Sound. The Cedar River ran into the Black River at the existing intersection of Airport Way and Rainier Avenue. In 1917, when the Lake Washington became lower, which eliminated the Black River as drainage for the lake and routed the Cedar River directly into Lake Washington. The old Black River channel now serves as a drainage canal for surface runoff from surround- ing ,areas into Lake Washington. For many years the Bonnell Nursery occupied the area of the present airport in front of the FAA Tower. In the 1920's Allen Blum opened a short turf strip be- tween the nursery and the lake and called Bryn Mawr Airfield . Early Bryn Mawr pilots had to make their final approach by flying parallel to high power lines then dropping over a row of poplar trees which had been planted to discourage flights over the nursery area. , On August 7, 1935, Bryn Mawr Airfield served as the take-off point for Will Rogers and Wiley Post on their scheduled flight to Alaska. Because the strip was adjacent to the lake, it provided an excellent base for conducting land and water flight activities. Aircraft could land on the strip, be outfitted with pontoons and continue the flights to Alaska, where water operations were almost mandatory. Will Rogers and Wiley Post never completed their flight. They crashed in Alaska the same day. There is a monument to Rogers and Post on Rainier Avenue near the Chamber of Commerce office, and the seaplane base at the north end of the field was named Will Rogers-Wiley Post Memorial Seaplane Base in their honor. 12 I;n 1941 ,. the Department of the. Nayy constructed . the. first portion of the existing Boeing plant to develop an experimental flying aircraft called the "Sea Ranger". The existing runway was constructed in 1943 to provide checkout and take-off capability for th.e Boeing B-29 Superfortress. Over 1 , 100 B-29''s were flown off Renton Field. The City of Renton purchased the airport from the Federal Government's War Assets Administration in 1946 for $1 .00. The post-war general aviation boom brought a temporary surge of fixed base operators] to the airport; and of those, Renton Aviation is the only original firm still operating at Renton Airport. In 1950, the first control tower was built on the field. This building, which is now leased to Aero Dyne, can still be seen on the field. (The present control tower on the west side of the field was built in 1961 ) . In 1952, the Boeing Company began to produce its first prototype jet transport. Later, the Commercial Airplane Division selected their Renton plant for pro- duction of the commercial transport aircraft. Even though the Boeing manu- facturing facility is located off airport property, it has access to the field by means of a taxiway over the Cedar River, Boeing occupies about 60 percent of the rentable area on the airport for their aircraft operations. EXISTING AIRPORT FACILITIES AND PENDING DEVELOPMENT Renton Municipal Airport has grown to become one of the major general aviation airports in the Puget Sound area. An illustration of present airport facilities is shown in Figure III-2. The airfield consists of a single asphalt and concrete runway, known as Runway 15/33, with a full parallel taxiway on the west side and partial parallel taxi- 1 A fixed base operator (FBO) is an aviation oriented business offering a variety of services and products to aircraft owners and operators. 13 way at the southeast end. Specific features are; • Physical length of 5,379 feet and width of 200 feet, with a threshold displacement of 350 feet at the south end, resulting in a usable length of 5,029 feet. • Medium intensity runway lighting system • Runway end identifier lights (REtL) on Runway 15 • A VASI-2 system on each end of the runway There are no precision, or "straight in", instrument flight approaches to the field, FIGURE III-2 however, radar instrument approaches by EXISTING AIRPORT LAYOUT Area Navigation (RNAV) to Runway 33 or Surveillance Radar to Runway 15 are available. Minimums are 900 feet ceil- . Q incj and one mile visibility. J! a Three fixed base operators (FBO's) are . located on the airport and, together provide a full range of services:. major and minor repairs, aircraft sales, charter services, flight instruction, . and aircraft storage. In addition, there are aircraft painting, modifi- _ cation, and manufacturing facilities on O J the airport property. The majority of the aircraft storage hangars are located at the southeast corner of the airport. Ten additional T-hangars are scheduled to be completed in 1978 on the east side. Aircraft tiedown areas are located throughout the airport. a ' Aviation fuel facilities on the airport are located in the Aero Dyne , Boeing , Fancher, and Renton Aviation areas and provide a combined fuel capacity of 378,000 gallons . 14 The FAA air traffic control tower operates from 7:00 a.m. to 11 :00 p.m. seven days a week. SOCIOECONOMIC ACTIVITY An analysis of the socioeconomic base of the Renton and eastern Puget Sound region was conducted to project aviation demand at Renton Municipal Airport. In particular, the ability of a community to generate and sustain air trans- portation demand was found to be related to the population, employment, and per capita personal income of the area. Population • The population of King County has increased at a significantly greater rate than the U.S. during the period from 1960 to 1970 -- approximately 2.0 percent a year for King County compared with 1 .3 percent for the nation . Projections indicate that local population growth will continue to stay ahead of the U.S. growth rates. Between 1970 and 1990, U. S. growth is forecast to slow to 1 .0 percent a year, compared with 1 .4 percent a year for King County (See Table below) . TABLE III-1 HISTORIC AND FORECAST GROWTH OF POPULATION IN KING COUNTY AND THE UNITED STATES ACTUAL FORECAST 1960 1970 1980 1990 King County 935,000 1 , 136,000 1 ,215,0001 1 ,488,0001 United States 179,360,000 203,838,000 233,532,0002 246,039,0002 I 1 Source: Puget Sound Council of Governments 2 Source: Population and Economic Activity in the United States and Standard Metropolitan Statistical Areas , 1950 - 2020, Bureau of Economic Analysis, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1974. 15 11 Although average population growth in the area has been strong, it has suffered from occasional fluctuations. Historical population figures for the City of Renton in Table III-2 illustrate this fact. TABLE III-2 HISTORIC POPULATION CITY OF RENTON PERCENTAGE INCREASE/(DECREASE) YEAR POPULATION OVER PREVIOUS YEAR 1954 16,800 1955 ,16,300 ( 2) 1956 16,056 ( 1 ) 1957 16,900 5 1958 15,68o ( 7) 1959 17,223 9 1960 18,453 7 1961 18,880 2 1962 19,500 3 1963 20, 175 3 1964 20,600 3 1965 21 ,600 4 1966 21 ,701 1967 23,066 6 1968 26,800 16 1969 28, 140 5 — 1970 26,686 ( 5) 1971 26,383 ( 1) 1972 25,200 ( 4) 1973 26,25o 4 1974 26,337 y 1975 27,300 4 1976 26,900 ( 1 ) Between (.05) and .05 11 Source: City of Renton 16 4 Employment The major cause of population fluctuations in the region is a heavy dependence on manufacturing, particularly aerospace production, which is sensitive to the ups and downs of the general economy. Employment in King County in 1973 was distributed as follows: Classifications Employment Percent Agriculture 1 ,900 .4 Mining, Forestry, Fishing 2, 100 .4 Construction 19,300 3.7 Manufacturing 100,400 19.4 Transp. Comm. & Utility 35,400 6.8 Trade (Wholesale & Retail) 109,600 21 . 1 Finances, Ins. & Real Estate 35,900 6.9 Services 80,700 15.6 Government 88,500 17. 1 Not Classified 44,700 8.6 TOTAL 518,500 100.0 Renton is the home base for the Boeing Commercial Airplane Company. The Boeing 707's, 727's and 737's are produced in Renton for customers throughout the world. Also being produced at the Renton facility is a 300 passenger hydrofoil to be used in high speed water transportation. Boeing employment in the City of Renton currently totals over 12,000. The fluctuations in aerospace employment in the Puget Sound region is illu- strated in Table 111-3. 17 TABLE III-3 AEROSPACE EMPLOYMENT IN THE PUGET SOUND REGION YEAR AEROSPACE EMPLOYMENT 1956 43,300 1957 61 ,000 1958 65,000 1959 66,000 1960 56,800 1961 61 ,300 1962 72,600 1963 63,800 1964 52,200 1965 56,600 1966 84,600 1967 98,200 1968 103,900 1969 90,600 1970 61 ,200 Source: Puget Sound Council of Governments. Personal Income Although the present level of per capita personal income in the Puget Sound region is higher than the U.S. average, the growth rate for the U.S. per capita income is increasing at more than twice the regional rate -- 1 .6 percent a year for the Seattle-Everett Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area (SMSA) 1 , compared 1 1 Includes King and Snohomish Counties. 18 with a 3.8 percent a year for the nation. Projections indicate that the per capita personal income in the region will continue above the national average as indicated in Table III-4. TABLE III-4 COMPARISON OF PER CAPITA ' PERSONAL INCOME IN PUGET SOUND AND THE UNITED STATES • PER CAPITA PERSONAL INCOME SEATTLE-EVERETT STANDARD METROPOLITAN STATISTICAL AREA (SMSA) U. S. YEAR Historical 1962 3,275 2,584 1963 3,207 2,696 1964 3,214 2,664 1965 3,304 2,907 1966 3,670 3,049 1967 3,790 3, 170 1968 3,892 3,323 1969 3,824 3,436 1970 3,654 3,479 Forecasts 1980 5,300 4,700 1990 6,800 6, 100 2000 8,900 8, 100 Sources: Puget Sound Council of Governments; OBERS Projections, Economic ' Activity in the U.S. , Vol . 5, Standard Metropolitan Statistical Areas, U.S. Department of Commerce and U.S. Department of Agriculture, April , 1974. 19 r ;, AVIATION ACTIVITY The growth in the s.ociioeconomc base of King County and the overall Puget Sound area, described above, has not been reflected in the activity levels at Renton Municipal Airport. Between 1960 and 1975, aircraft based at the air- port increased by only 9 -- an annual rate of only 0.03 percent -- as shown in Table III-5. During the same period, the number of aircraft registered in the county grew from 575 to an estimated 1 ,300 today, an average annual increase of 5.6 percent. It is important to note, however, that the low increase at Renton was due to capacity restraints and was not due to a lack of demand in the area. (The dip in reported based aircraft between 1961 and 1967 could be neither explained nor verified by people familiar with activity at the Airport during that period. Therefore, for purposes of aviation forecasting, the number of based aircraft was assumed to increase linearly from 1961 to 1967) . • An analysis of the current FAA computer files of aircraft registrations reveals the character of the aircraft types at Renton Municipal Airport as compared to other airports in the County. Although Renton Municipal has the same percentage of multiengine aircraft as the County (Figure III-3) , it has a higher percentage of single engine planes. Its percentage of large aircraft is greater than Auburn Municipal and Bellevue Airports, but less than that of King County International . Figure III-4 illustrates that airports with larger numbers of single engine aircraft tend to have more pleasure aircraft. Renton Municipal has less pleasure aircraft than the county average but nearly as many business planes. In both aircraft size and use, the percentage of aircraft based at Renton Municipal are similar to the averages for the County. Overall , the profiles characterize the Airport as one which is about equally divided between pleasure flying and commercial uses. -- following closely the county averages. Another characteristic of the Airport is the low level of flying activity per 20 i I based aircraft, as illustrated in Figure I11-5. TABLE III-5 HISTORICAL AIRCRAFT ACTIVITY AT RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT BASED AIRCRAFT TOTAL YEAR Available Data* Estimated* OPERATIONS 1960 178 178 *** 1961 170 170 68,785 1962 122 172 58, 109 1963 125 174 64,287 1964 *** 176 73,931 1965 125 178 103,373 1966 125 180 • 185,814 1967 182 182 185,237 1968 *** 186 - 204,386 1969 190 190 185,728 1970 179 179 149,563 1971 179 179 128,696 1972 166 166 121 ,680 1973 *** 173 155,039 1974 *** 180 152,763 1975 187 187 118,011 1976 190 119,776 * Sources: For 1960-1972 data, FAA Form 5010 records; for 1975 data, airport inventory conducted in July 1975 for master planning study. ** Source: Numbers in italics were estimated by linear interpolation. **; Not available. 21 • • FIGURE III-3 PERCENTAGE OF AIRCRAFT BY TYPE AUBURN MUNICIPAL AIRPORT SINGLE BELLEVUE AIRPORT ENGINE "�' d FA VAI � RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT ;KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL --� AIRPORT COUNTY AVERAGE `!• KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT I I MULTI- RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT ENGINE - I BIELLEVUE AIRPORT NEM AUBURN MUNICIPAL AIRPORT COUNTY AVERAGE • • .171/ f- _I 'KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 2. I RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT • OTHER I I • BELLEVUE AIRPORT iAUBURN MUNICIPAIL AIRPORT I I 20 40 60 80 - 100 PERCENTAGE • 9.7 FIGURE III-4 PERCENTAGE OF AIRCRAFT BY PRIMARY USE - ►I I I ' AUBURN MUNICIPAL AIRPORT BELLEVUE AIRPORT PLEASURE :M119112=1:' �'W RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT COUNTY AVERAGE KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT INSTRUCTIONAL RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT TAXI AND ®�' RENTAL BELLEVUE AIRPORT I I AUBURN MUNICIPAL AIRPORT BELLEVUE AIRPORT' I KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BUSINESS I I "' RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT i I AUBURN MUNICIPAL AIRPORT • COUNTY AVERAGE ' KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT OTHER 1 RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT I • AUBURN MUNICIPAL AIRPORT • BELLEVUE AIRPORT 0 20 40 60 80 •100 • PERCENTAGE FIGURE III-5 AVERAGE ANNUAL HOURS FLOWN PER AIRCRAFT II AUBURN MUNICIPAL AIRPORT • MULTI- KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT ENGINE ©'®AV®' '®®�� I RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT IBELLEVUE AIRPORT COUNTY AVERAGE KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL 'AIRPORT SINGLE BELLEVUE AIRPORT ENGINE I AUBURN MUNICIPAL AIRPORT r�'���®V'®®�' I RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT COUNTY AVERAGE . KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT I AUBURN MUNICIPAL AIRPORT TOTAL BELLEVUE AIRPORT RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT 0 100 200 300 400 HOURS NNI 4®' >, / 0„'r e-.00.,,..3 C -I-- . �'•,�x�• tollwAt cp �Y i •,77'k U"'" at. iYa 3i:: ls (// \1 T• f�i'`[�"`9icgi5i1 m, \Vvf cn 7 U (9 ,•• • �./ 0 O 0 ,........_ I I . the capability of a general aviation airport to serve aviation activity is primarily governed by the capacities of three elements: the airfield, the airspace, and the aircraft parking, storage and service facilities. The next three sections of this chapter describe in detail the methodology and results of the capacity analysis of each of the above areas. This evaluation, Ito- gether with the forecasts provides the basis for the identification and timing of future airport facility requirements. AIRFIELD The Federal Aviation Agency (now the Federal Aviation Administration) ,adopted a methodology for calculating airfield capcity almost twenty years ago. Based upon the physical characteristics of the field and the types of aircraft using the field, the capacity is stated in terms of practical hourly capacity (PHOCAP) , and practical annual capacity (PANCAP) , with an associated level of 26 delay. ] The capacity calculations assume that reasonable and practical amounts of aircraft delay are acceptable. For general aviation airports, these acceptable levels have been defined as: • Two minutes average delay for visual flight rules (VFR)2 departures . • One minute average delay for all VFR arrivals • Four minutes average delay for all instrument flight rules 3 (IFR) arrivals and departures. The computed, practical capacity• is reached when these delay levels are reached. These arbitrary delay levels were established during development of the compu- tational techniques, and reflect the impact of high demands at peak periods. The practical capacity should not be considered the maximum capacity since it can be exceeded. Exceeding the practical capacity results in a higher level of delay for aircraft. The airfield capacity of a particular airport will be affected by many ,variables. In particular, the following factors are identified as key capacity determinants; the runway-taxiway configuration, weather conditions, aircraft mix, types of electronic landing aids, and "touch-and-go" operations. l' The sources are as follows: a. Airport Capacity Criteria Used in Preparing the National Airport Plan. FAA AC 150/5060-1A July, 1968. b. Airport Capacity Used in Long-Range Planning, FAA AC150/5060-3A, December 1969. c. Airport Capacity Handbook, Airborne Instruments Laboratory (AIL) June 1969. 2 VFR operations are made when the visibility and ceiling are above prescribed minimums and landings and departures can be made with visual reference to the ground. 3 IFR flight operations are made under designated instrument approach and de- parture procedures with the use of radar and/or radio navigational ! aids. 27 Weather conditions are particularly important because they determine the per- centage of time a given runway configuration can be used. Weather Analysis Weather observations recorded at Renton Municipal Airport from January 1 , 1970 through December 31 , 1974 were keypunched, tabulated, and analysed. Detailed tables covering wind, ceiling, and visibility information are included, in a separate report entitled "Analysis of Weather Observations at Renton Municipal Airport". Significant conclusions are: 1 . The runway orientation is ideal , with all-weather wind coverage of over 99 percent and almost 95 percent VFR coverage. 2. Winds of over 20 knots average 41 hours a year, tend to occur In the afternoons, and are predominately from the south, 3. Over one-half of the time the winds favor the south-southeast,, south, or south-southwest quadrant. This condition is prevalent during all months of the year except during July and August when the winds occur primarily from the north. 4. Cloud cover which would constitute a flight "cei_ling" occurs at all altitudes up to 4,000 feet (where the computer run stopped) with a heavier predominance around 3,000 feet. Current Practical Capacities When the airfield capacity methodology was applied to Renton Municipal , Airport, the following existing capacities were computed: PHOCAP VFR 125 operations per hour IFR 15-20 operations per hour1 1 Based on discussions with FAA Air Traffic Control Tower personnel. 28 PANCAP 175,000 operations per year An adequate number of taxiway exits have been provided to the west parallel taxiway. Additional exits to that side of the field would not improve capacity but would improve the general flow of traffic. Improved airfield instrumentation would increase annual capacity by allowing landings at the airport a greater percentage of the time. A precision in- strument approach system, ' such as a microwave landing system (MLS) , would increase annual capacity an estimated 10,000 operations. AIRSPACE CAPACITY Airspace usage in the Seattle-Tacoma area forms a complex interrelated pat- tern. King County. International , Seattle-Tacoma International , and Tacoma Industrial all have ILS approach systems. Other paved fields in the area are Bellevue, Crest, and Auburn Municipal . I ,I Figure IV-1 indicates the low altitude airspace area required by each 'airport.2 Although there is considerable overlap in standard airspace area requirements, the FAA is able to maintain a safe--separation in air traffic by using pre- selected flight patterns for all airports. Instrument approaches to Renton Municipal are currently made to Runway133 using an RNAV approach and to Runway 15 using Surveillance Radar approach, 1 A "precision" instrument ap proach pproach system provides both course line and decent guidance information to aircraft approaching an airport to land. 2 Criteria for determining the airspace requirements appear in: Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, Guidelines for Airport Spacing and Traffic Pattern Airspace Area, Order 7480. 1A, August 3,', 1971 .. 29 FIGURE IV-1 EXISTING AIRSPACE REQUIREMENTS OF AREA AIRPORTS ,i7iiiiiiff: :::( I ( SEA VAL I R NA STATION A I 1 1 (CLOSED► .......:.::.:.:::::.::.:.:.... .• •.•. .....,„... ..... ••.. ••....... . .....„...... ...... . . I, iiiii : .. ...-......-. /111111/II,: .......„ ......... .•... . ......... .......... .. ......... ................, ... ..........................., v BELLE UE 0 8:::::::.i.:::::::::: :: :.:::::.:i... ...]::.: ...:::::: :::ii:iii:.:::::: ::::.::::::::: :.:::.:: ::••••::•::•... . f,:.....,.:::::.0:.,::.::.:::.•:•:-:::i.:•:-.,:.•:•::. i.,::::,:::::::::::::,...:.::.,,,::„,:::.::::••:,:,,:::.::::.::-::::::.:::. lig::::‘ .'..i'' zit iti AI K • ......-......, iiik • ,...:iif.%.':%.f..i.t-.:•:f••.•:,.:*:•i..i...'•-.;..'...i::•..Wm•:?..!...•:.:•..7......*.•%"A..%•:.-.:i•..••:ft‘....•••:...:..t••:•..::•%:.„-:•a.4..•:..i•....'i:•%..,:•:....•••::...,%„..:.....:...,.•...:..:::.,.,..::,:.:.:::.:..:::„:...:..:ft%:...„..::.::•%:..::...::„„i.,:•:...::%::*%•.::•:•.:.:':.:1.:%::,.'.:..::..:::::.:,7:::•::„.,:..::%:-ft„N:::•:..:.,:-:..:...:,:....:,•:...:..::.k.:.%.:.::•.::•..::•:.::.•..,..:...::...::..:::%...::•..:.:-,'•..?...:%::...:..:.•:•..:M:::-.:..:::,•.......:-..:::•....:::,:.„:.-::•-::•...::::.:„::,i::%:.:i:-.::•:.,..:.•,.'.:...:,:..:....:...:: ......:::.•.:-..:•....:%:..::..':::a:.,:.:••..:.::•.•.,.:..:•:.:••,.:':•.:..i•...-:.:::.•...-...:..:,•..:::.:..:.....•..':.:..:%,...: I'ING COUNTY • .•.•.i•,'.:••i•..i•.:?i;ii.:il}d,l..?/11.41,-:.:::, :��� INTERNATIONA i AIRP ORT Fl ELD �i ` 1 1 b RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT I 0 a ..:.i. *:::i: ::.:::2:':::A . %:'::::.:'::::.:::::-• i 1a IIII SEATTLE- ..': o TACOMA .. INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 9 ; AUBUR N CREST w a AIRP ORT MUNICIPAL T ::. Al Ill) IRPO Y. RT • i N. 0 .� �t 30 as illustrated in Figure IV-2. The RNAV approach pattern is "straight-in" beginning about three miles south of Auburn Municipal Airport, at an alti- tude of 3,000 feet. Aircraft executing a missed approach climb straight ahead to 1 ,300 feet then climb right to 3,000 feet. Instrument approaches to Renton can occur simultaneously with instrument approaches to both King County and Seattle-Tacoma Airports. ILS approaches to King County are from the northwest. Missed approaches climb left and continue to climb to 3,000 feet. This route passes nearby over Renton Municipal , but the altitude is sufficient to provide adequate separation from Renton Municipal missed approaches. An ILS approach into Seattle Tacoma can be made from either the north or the south, although the predom- inant direction is from the north. In both cases the missed approach pat- tern is straight out. Although these airports are in close proximity to Renton Municipal Airport and the Seaplane base they do not impose restrictions on the operational capacity of the airport beyond those created by airfield limitations. AIRCRAFT PARKING AND STORAGE CAPACITY The third major factor which imposes a limitation on the activity is the available space for the parking and storage of aircraft. Current Capcity Land leased by Boeing Aircraft Corporation occupies about 60 percent of the leasable airport area. Areas for aircraft repair and aviation-related manu- facturing also consume large portions of airport• property. Consequently, there is little leasable space available on the airport for aircraft ;storage. Three types of space are needed: large hangar space for aircraft maintenance and servicing; T-hangar space for individual , enclosed aircraft storage; and open tie-down space for aircraft. 31 FIGURE IV-2 INSTRUMENT APPROACHES TO RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT .....!:.:.....:..I.d:::::::::::::::.11".1!1"illr..:::::::."'. N''''*16,,Ir. illgiiikitilliiliNli..#17. III" 1 SURVEILLANCE ":,,,\ 7• ..j RADAR APPROACH •••:::••••11:1:1:i:::::::.:•;?;:iiil:dr':•:::.:.::::::::::::r...*:.: ::.*•:::.::.:x:.:::.:.:::.:•::iii......?.....:::...... ......:..'....,/,..:.."..:.. t FINAL AP PROACH OAC H FIX ........:::..:..: 2 100'MSL .1•.:••••::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::. ••••::::•:::::(1, 0 FIX :���•M MIS SED APPROACH I • �_ (900 MSL) I ;.....:...i:iii.. 1 (. :•;:::::::::::MS:.:•••• ''''::?:::::::::;:];:•::::•2::::•EHi'iii.*:;':':':::::::: lir . Z1 MISSED APPROACH POINT 880' MSL ) ) ir*P4 KENT WAY INT (1,600' MSL) C) v N M M 0 a ' / Q A A' dQ RNAV c 3� APPROACH Table IV-1 indicates the current hangar and tie-down space at each of the air- port operator's facilities. A total of 215 aircraft can be accommodated in T- hangars and tie-down areas for both based and transient users. In addition, approximately 5 aircraft are typically stored in the large common, or conven- tional , hangars although these hangars are principally used for aircraft main- tenance and servicing. The lack of T-hangar space is the most critical limi- tation. This need is verified by the waiting lists of customers for such space. TABLE lvi EXISTING CAPACITIES OF AIRCRAFT STORAGE AREAS RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT AIRCRAFT STORAGE SPACES* CONVENTIONAL OPERATOR HANGAR T-HANGAR TIE-DOWN TOTAL Aero Dyne 25 28 53 Airport Specialties - 29** 5' 34 Cheesman - - 14 14 Dominion Aircraft 1 - - I Fancher 2 - 26 28 Municipal - 10 - 10 Puget Sound Power and Light 2 - - 2 Renton Aviation _ 3 75 78 TOTAL 5 67 148 220 ;; Includes seaplane areas. Ten of these to be completed in 1978. 33 Aircraft are located principally in FIGURE IV-3 four areas of the airport (See Figure LOCATION OF AIRCRAFT PARKING AREAS IV-3) : a parcel on the east side of the field near the old control tower (Airport Specialties ; Cheesman, and 1t r Fancher) ; the southeast corner of the field (Aero-Dyne) ; the southwest corner (Fancher) , and the northwest end of the airport (Renton Aviation) . In addition, the southern portion of Boeing Apron C is subleased to Aero- Dyne,for aircraft parking. Expansion Potential k 'it A The airport is bounded to the north ifs a by Lake Washington, to the east by the Boeing Aircraft plant and the Cedar River, to the south by light industrial and commercial areas of Renton, and to the west by residential development and high'. ground. The only economically viable approach toward expanding the land area of the airport is the acquisition of land on the northwest side of the airport. Further space for parking general aviation aircraft can be obtained by using areas currently used for other purposes or by developing small unused areas. One possibility is for Boeing to sublease on a short-term basis the remain- ing usable area of Apron C, an area which has been little used for many years. The Boeing apron leases run to the year 2010. An analysis was made to determine the maximum number of aircraft spaces that could be made available at the airport if all available unused areas were occupied and optimum use was made of all space. It is estimated ,thela'irport could accomodate approximately 210 based aircraft. In addition,space would be available for about 16' transient aircraft. I , 34 H ,l A potential for obtaining more tiedown space is to relocate the west taxi- way closer to the runway, thereby allowing more space to base aircraft to the west of the taxiway. Approximately 80 spaces would be gained if the taxiway was relocated. This possibility is discussed in more detail in Chapter 8. 35 il , 11 , . 11 . . , . . . , 1 . , :., s .r e ow trail lc forecasts v . „ .... ''T'•' '•71. i' -1''' ' . NI , . cNtqfP" •• . il.,%Ifo vi, . &qv*, '1:11 li" ..„, .t . ; 1.,c4Kir ..0irri . . 1 . .., . . „ ! , . , . 1 ' , ,, Forecasts of aviation demand form the basis for; • - Confirming the role of the airport and estimating future airport facility requirements. • Estimating the noise and air pollution impacts of aircraft on the surrounding community. • Evaluating the financial feasibility of proposed airport development. Anticipated levels of activity at Renton Municipal Airport were estimated for the years 1980, 1985, 1990 and 1995. Table V-1 p.resents a summary of' these forecasts. In the sections that follow, the methodology used to develop the forecasts is described. 37 1 TABLE V-i SUMMARY OF AVIATION FORECASTS RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT YEAR Actual or Estimated ITEM 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 1995* Based Aircraft 187 210 210 210 210 290 Aircraft Type Single Engine 164 177 170 164 „ 158 217 Multiengine 22 32 38 44 50 70 Rotary 1 1 2 2 2 3 Land vs. Seaplane Land planes 161 181 181 181 181 250 Seaplanes 26 29 29 29 ' 29 40 Annual General 118,000 160,000 180,000 200,000 200,000 220,000 Aviation Operations Itinerant vs. Local Itinerant 53,000 70,000 83,000 96,000 1Oo,000 110,000 Local 65,000 90,000 97,000 104,000 100,000 110,000 Instrument Operations ' 3,089 6,400 13,500 16,000 17,000 18,700' Busy Hour Operations VFR 118 128 144 160 160 176 FR 4 9 19 22 24 26 * With relocation of Taxiway A (see Chapter 8) ; approximately 80 aircraft parking spaces are gained. BASED GENERAL AVIATION FORECASTS As a first step in predicting future aviation activity at the airport, fore- casts of based general aviation aircraft were derived. From these forecasts, estimations of fleet mix and operational levels were made. Because Renton Municipal Airport has been faced with severe limitations on its ability to expand either the airfield and the use of existing ground-side aircraft areas, the forecasts of future activity had to consider these limi- tations . The section that follows discusses these limitations. To gain a better understanding of the effect of the expansion constraints of past activity 38 at the airport, an estimation was first made of the numbers of aircraft that would have been based at the airport if sufficient space had always been available. Next, unconstrained based aircraft forecasts were developed assuming an adequate number of tie-down spaces could be made available 'now. Finally, the constrained forecasts based on the existing capacity limitations were derived. Constraints to Past Airport- Growth It is apparent from the historical aviation activity that a number of factors have been limiting the growth at Renton Municipal Airport over the past 15 • years. It is believed that at least three major factors have exerted the greatest influence: 1) the lack of available aircraft storage area, 2) lack of an instrument approach system, and 3) inadequate seaplane facilities. Al- though runway capacity has not been a major limiting factor in the past, annual aircraft operations are approximately at the PANCAP level , and thus airfield capacity- may become a factor in the future. Since the late 1950's, space leased for manufacturing and other indirect air- port uses (principally to Boeing Aircraft Company) has accounted for the largest part of the useable airport space. For that reason, adequate space for parking and storing aircraft has not been available. Furthermore, because of surrounding land uses, any significant expansion of aircraft areas beyond the present boundaries has been impossible. Over the past 15 years, there has been a significant growth across the county in instrument flight rule (IFR) activity. This has been the result of the greater availability of improved landing aids, especially the Instrument Landing System (ILS) , and the willingness of aircraft owners to install the airborne equipment necessary for IFR operations. The lack of a precision instrument approach system (such as an ILS) has, no doubt, contributed to the constrained growth at Renton Municipal . Nearby King County International , with its dual runway system and ILS capability has grown to approximately 360 based aircraft - nearly twice the size of Renton Municipal . 39 i I , The third limiting factor is the inadequacy of seaplane facilities. Currently there are only a few permanent seaplane moorage positions, located .a short lateral distance from the Runway 15 threshold. There are no T-hangarunits near the seaplane area nor is there dock fueling. The lack of adequate facilities for seaplanes becomes more acute when it is realized that Renton Municipal Airport is one of the few publicly owned and operated seaplane bases in Puget Sound area, yet bases only 17 percent of the estimated 156 seaplanes located throughout Puget Sound. Potential Growth From 1960 • From about 1960 to the present time, the number of based aircraft at Renton Municipal Airport has changed very little. During the same period, popu- lation in the service area has been growing, resulting in a decline in the ratio of based aircraft per 10,000 population. On the other hand, the ratio of active registered aircraft per 10,000 'pop- , ulation in King County as a whole has been increasing at the rate of about .39 a year since 1960. The comparison of the airport data with the county data is shown in Figure V-l . During this same period the U.S. active registered . aircraft per 10,000 population grew from about 3.8 to about 7.3, an average increase of .24 per year. Under the assumption that the growth in based aircraft per 10,000 population at Renton Municipal would have equalled the county growth of .39 a year if constraints on the use of aircraft areas did not exist, the ratio of biased aircraft per 10,000 service area population at Renton Municipal would, have grown to approximately 14 in 1975. This potential growth is illustrated. graphically in Figure V-1 . When the potential aircraft rates shown in Figure V-1 are applied to the actual service area population, an estimate of the unconstrained based aircraft 40 • l FIGURE V•1 AIRCRAFT OWNERSHIP RATE . UNITED STATES, COUNTY OF KING, AND RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT... 14 • `` RENTON �`�_ MUNICIPAL `�• AIRPORT 12 'I. (POTENTIAL) f' ,1 `� 410 `100 f '10 00I " 4 '� _ CouNTY z �' OF KING o. #I Q J 8 , a 0 _ a �h c 1I!/,r�r,..,,`ICia, /gA w ff•f••f`MI/111111, UNITED • a STATES LL 6 Q 2 U CC /�■/saw. Q, RENTON ' •MUNICIPAL AI RPO RT (ACTUAL) 4 • • I , 0 . I 1960 1965 1970 1975 YEAR ' • 41 FIGURE V-2 UNSATISFIED DEMAND FOR BASED AIRCRAFT AT RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT 500 POTENTIAL _a,IIIPNOMMg 400 F— a cc .�: UN5ATI •SFI ED OftiffMMONOMBEMI DEMAND Bgvgaaammm 200 W - Mfh Illll,�.tlll�/l l; i11�::,..�:::::�:::::..::::�::.:::�•.::,:_ ..v:i.•'..�:. ..:i..:�•..�:..�:v r..,.,: �ii}ii:{::::.�.:::.::•.�:::..:::::n.:::: •:::i:+J:::::::iiiiiiJii:4:.ii}i:•iii}i}i;.�::.�..:::.�::.�:�:::::::.�n�.�::::::................................... : :Sii?i:•i'::::::. ::.�::::...... ..:•{{}.:;:;{��i:}i}i:•:Jii}ii}i:{ti:::::::i::i::::::::i:!:ii::jni:4iii:ii4:4iii:i:?:it. sir :-:;:•;;<:>:>«zz:»;;:>.;:.;;:.;:.:.;:.;>:.:.:.;:.:::.::z::::::::?<:,.;:::: i[ir ACTUAL • 100. 0 1960 1965 1970 1975 YEAR potential is determined. The potential demand , shown in Figure V-2, is 475 based aircraft in 1975. The area between the potential and actual levels represents demand which has not been satisfied at Renton Municipal Airport. For example, the unsatisfied demand in 1975 is estimated to be 288 based air- craft (475-187 = 288) . This unsatisfied demand has not been 111ost". Instead it has been absorbed over the years by other airports within the area, both public and private. 4 Forecasts of Unconstrained Growth The fact remains, however, that Renton has not been able to accommodate all the potential growth in its service area. The next step in the forecasting process is, therefore, to establish the unconstrained forecasts based upon the assumption that the expansion of the airport from this point onward is unlimited. This unconstrained forecast is also recognized to be unrealistic because constraints to unlimited growth do exist; however, the unconstrained forecasts provide the foundation for estimating the true forecasts taking into consideration the various limiting factors at the airport. The uncon- strained forecast is assumed to consist of two components: a natural increase in demand due to increasing population and per capita income in the area and an incremental increase in demand that would result from the opening of new facilities on the airport. The natural growth is addressed first. 1 . The level of aircraft based at Renton Municipal as a percentage of the county total has declined steadily from 30 percent in 1960 to a current level of about 15 percent. Under the assumption' that, Renton Municipal can continue to capture 15 percent of the county total , based aircraft at Renton would grow from the current 187 to 360 in 1995. A graphic illustration is Figure V-3. The relative flat growth from 1975 to 1980 is 'due--to corresponding projections of a small population increase during the period. The county forecast mentioned above was derived under the assumption that the level of county aircraft per 10,000 population would grow at a rate of .24 per year (the nation's average from 1960 to 1975) , a rate which is slower than the 15-year county average of .39 a year. The following population forecasts developed by the Puget Sound Council of Governments for King County were used: , 1970 (actual) 1 , 136,600 1980 1 ,214,550 1990 1 ,488,330 43 FIGURE V-3 NATURAL GROWTH OF BASED GENERAL AVIATION AIRCRAFT 500 400 NATURAL GROWTH (15% OF COUNTY) Tho''` Q 300 • `I `` /I O Q am 100 1 0 1960 1970 1980 1990 YEARS The resulting King County active registered aircraft forecast is; 1973 (actual ) 1 , 165 1980 1 ,419 1990 2,096 2. The incremental component of demand was derived by examining. the current level of unsatisfied demand discussed in the preceding section, and was reinforced by comparing that with information supplied by FBO's concerning their waiting lists and general opinions regarding the potential based aircraft demand which would be obtained ;if more • 44 it space were immediately available. The conservative judgment of FBO's at Renton Municipal is that with additional aircraft hangars and a precision instrument approach, customers would desire to base an additional 55 to 65 aircraft at the airport. This is approximately 19 to 23 percent of the current "unmet demand" (288 aircraft) shown in Figure V-2. For purposes of our analysis it was estimated that 20. percent of the unmet demand (or 58 based aircraft) would be the incremental increase in demand which would result if the required facilities could be added. Based on discussions with airport operators and the capability, of adding seaplane facilities, it is estimated that about one-third (or 20 aircraft) of this incremental increase would be seaplanes . The incremental amount was added between the years 1975 and 1985,' when most of the new facilities would be added. ( With the incremental amount added, the Renton Municipal percentage of the total county aircraft would increase from the current 115 per- cent to almost 19 percent. The total unconstrained forecast 'On- _ cluding both components of demand) was obtained by assuming that Renton Municipal Airport would continue to attract about 19 percent of the county total . The resulting forecast (illustrated graphically in Figure V-4) is as follows: 1980 - total 210, (land plane 170, seaplane 40) ; 1985 - total 328, (land plane 272, seaplane 56) ; and 1995 total 456 (land plane 390, seaplane 66) . Constrained Aircraft Forecast The limitations imposed by lack of aircraft parking and storage areas were discussed in Chapter IV. To summarize, the aircraft capacity of the' field is estimated to be 210 based aircraft, allowing adequate space for transient users. Thus, the constrained forecast of based aircraft will increase from the present level of 187 to 210 by 1980 and remain at this level (see Figure V-5) . The aircraft parking capacity of the field would be expanded to over 290 if Taxiway A were relocated (see Chapter 8) . 45 __I FIGURE V-4 UNCONSTRAINED FORECAST OF BASED GENERAL AVIATION AIRCRAFT 500 - •• • • • 400 •• • NATURAL AND INCREMENTAL • ' GROWTH - ••• (19% OF COUNTY) S.•• 00®` Q 300 ••• 00,0 U NATURAL GROWTH Q • ONLY y I`� (15% OF COUNTY) 200 100 0 1960 1970 1980 1990 YEARS GENERAL AVIATION AIRCRAFT MIX Although growth in overall aviation activity at Renton Municipal will be limit- ed, the character of the airport and the corresponding types of aircraft using it will undergo considerable change over the next 20 years. As demand for 46 FIGURE V-5 FORECAST OF BASED AIRCRAFT CONSTRAINED BY AIRPORT FACILITIES 500 •• UNCONSTRAINED • GROWTH ' ••• 400 ••• •• Q 300 - AIRCRAFT PARKING CONSTRAINT ••• (210 BASED AIRCRAFT) • • • Q • � •• 200 �' �1M���I• EN m 4111/111101.SSSUS1S111S11111N�• , FORECAST OF BASED AIRCRAFT 100 0 1960 1970 1980 1990 YEAR use of the limited facilities increases, a larger proportion of aviation activity at Renton Municipal will be for business uses as opposed to pleasure flying. Consequently the trend toward larger general aviation aircraft will continue. The current mix of aircraft is shown in Table v-2 according to the aircraft location. The data were obtained from an inventory of based aircraft at Renton Municipal taken in July, 1975. 47 -- I 1 TABLE V-2 AIRCRAFT INVENTORY RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT JULY 1975 Single Multi- Location Seaplane] Land Plane TOTAL Helicopter Engine Engine Aero-Dyne 1 49 50 1 36 13 Airport Specialties - 18 18 - 18 - Cheesman - 11 11 - 11 - Dominion - 1 1 - - 1 Fancher 5 23 28 - 27 1 Jobmaster 1 1 2 - 1 1 Municipal - 10 10 - 8 2 Puget Power 1 2 3 1 2 Renton Aviation 18 46 64 - 62 2 TOTAL 26 161 187 1 164 22 13.9% 86. 1% 100% .5% 87.7% 11 .8% 1 Includes seaplanes, float planes, and amphibians. Seaplane Activity Currently there are estimated to be 156 seaplanes in the Puget Sound area.2 (The general term "seaplane" as used in this document refers to all aircraft capable of operating on water: seaplanes, float planes , and amphibians) . Twenty-six of these, or 17 percent, are based at Renton Municipal (14 seaplanes and 12 amphibian) . 2 Interpolated from forecasts given in: The Aerospace Corporation, Washington State Airport System Plan, Volume ll , Page 4-52, June, 1973 . 48 1 li It is estimated that if unlimited seaplane facilities were available at Renton, the airport would attract up to 26 percent of the Puget Sound sea- planes through 1995. Based onforecasts for total seaplanes in the area (Table V-3) the resulting unconstrained forecast for Renton would reach 61 in 1995. However, if no seaplane facility expansion occurs at Renton ' the seaplanes will continue to account for about 14 percent of Renton's based aircraft. TABLE V-3 SEAPLANE FORECAST RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT Percent Number Number Seaplanes of Puget Seap lanes Land Total in Puget Sound at at Planes at ', at Year Sound Area Renton Renton Renton Renton 'o a) O a� C C c c •co .III •co •Co L L L L 4J 4I iJ 4J C C C C O 0 0 0 U U C-) C C 1975 156 17 26 161 187 FORECASTS 1980 180 22 16 46 29 181 210 1985 200 26 15 51 29 181 210 1990 218 26 13 57 29 181 210 1995 236 26 12 61 29 181 210 1995** 236 26 17 61 40 250 290 Interpolated from estimates made in: The Aerospace Corporation, Washington State Airport System Plan, Volume II , June 1973. I With relocation of Taxiway A. 49 i • III Aircraft Size ' Because of the increasing use of business aircraft and the desire to have these aircraft easily accessible it is anticipated that the airport will attract greater percentages of multiengine aircraft. The historical trend toward larger equipment' is illustrated in Table V-4, , TABLE V-4 EXISTING AND FORECAST FLEET MIX RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT FIXED WING . Single Engine Multi-Engine , Rotary Year Total Number Percent* Number Percent* Number 'Percent* 1960 178 172 97 6 • 3 0 0 1961 • 170 ** ;:* ** ** ** ** 1962 122 116 95 6 5 0 0 ' 1963 125 120 96 5 4 0' 0 1964 ** ** ** ** * ' ** 1965 125 • 120 95 5 4 0 0 . 1966 125 129 96 5 4 0 0 . 1967 182 177 97 5 3 0 r 0 1968 ;:* ** ** ** ** ** ::;: 1969 190 180 95 9 5• 1 11 1970 179 161 90 17 10 1 i 1 1971 179 161 90 17 10 1 1 1972 166 145 87 20 13 1 ' ' 1 1973 ** ** ** ** ** ** 1974 ** ' ** ** *;: * .** 1975 187 164 88 22 12 1 1 FORECASTS 1980 210 177 84 32 15 1 1 1985 210 170 81 38 18 2 1 1990 210 164 78. 44 21 2 1 1995 210 158 75 50 24 2 1 . 1995;;** 290 217 75 70 24 3 1 * Detailed percentages may not add to totals due to rounding. ** Data was either not available or considered unreliable. ti ' *** With Taxiway A relocation. 50 The percentage of multiengine aircraft has increased from 3 percent in 1960 to 12 percent in 1975, an average increase of 3 percent every five years, Be- cause overall growth at the airport will continue to be limited, a continuing shift from single engine to multiengine aircraft has been indicated in the forecasts. Based on a growth in multiengine based aircraft of three percent every five years and a constant one percent for rotary wing aircraft (the current rotary percentage) , the forecasts in Table V-4 result. AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS The number and type of aircraft operations (landings and take-offs) at an air- port are generally dependent upon the number of aircraft based there and the functional use of the airport. Estimates of future aircraft operations at, Renton Municipal Airport are presented below. Total Operations General aviation operations have recently fluctuated between 630 and 1 ,098, operations per based aircraft as shown in Table V-5. The recent trend towards fewer operations reflects the general economic slump and increases in the price of fuel and other general aviation operating costs. Historically, general aviation activity, especially pleasure flying, has been sensitive to economic conditions and flying costs. It is anticipated that the number of operations per based aircraft will increase to 950 over the next 15 to 20 years (if the airport is limited to 210 based aircraft) -- to 200,000 operations in 1990 :and 1995. With relocation of Taxiway A, operations are expected to increase to, 220,000 because of increased based aircraft. Military operations at Renton Municipal have historically totalled only several hundred a year. During both 1973 and 1974 there were approximately 500 operations by military aircraft. Since there are no indications that military use of the airport will increase, it is estimated that military operations will continue at about 500 per year. There are no air carriers operating from Renton Municipal Airport. The Boeing , 51 manufacturing facility, located adjacent to the airport, manufactures air carrier type aircraft, but all aircraft operations are departures, not arrivals. (Actually, an average of three arrivals per year by these aircraft has been recorded, but this is nil as far as the totals are concerned. ) :The departures by the new aircraft are included in the general aviation aircraft activity. TABLE V-5 GENERAL AVIATION OPERATIONS PER BASED AIRCRAFT RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT General Aviation General Aviation Operations YEAR Based Aircraft Operations Per Based Aircraft 1967 182 185,094 1 ,017 • 1968 186* 204,219 1 ,098 I. 1969 190 185,303 975 1970 179 149,284 834 1971 179 128,411 717 1972 166 121 ,280 731 1973 173* 153,771 889 1974 180* 136,704 759 1975 187 118,011 631 1976 190* 119,776 630 FORECASTS 1980 210 160,000 750 - 1985 210 180,000 350 1990 210 200,000 950 1995 210 200,000 950 1995** 290 220,000 750 Estimated With relocation of Taxiway A. 52 i Itinerant and Local Operations Two types of operations local and itinerant are commonly identified: 1 . Local Operations Aircraft which operate in the local traffic pattern or within sight of the tower and are known to be departing for or arriving from , flights in local practice areas located within a 20-mile radius of the airport and/or control tower, and aircraft which executive simulated instrument approaches or low passes at the airport. 2. Itinerant Operations All aircraft arrivals and departures other than local operation's described above. Itinerant operations have averaged 42 percent of the total at Renton Munici- pal over the last eight years. Because the airport is expected to handle , more business-related activity in the future, the itinerant activity is esti- mated to increase to 50 percent in 1995 - slightly below the national average for airports with FAA air traffic control towers. See Table V-6. Instrument Operations Instrument operations are arrivals or departures done under instrument con- ditions. For the most part, they fall within the itinerant category. Instru- ment operations as a percentage of the total have been steadily increasing at the airport and now account for 2.6 percent of all operations. Although the feasibility of installing an MLS precision instrument approach system is un- certain at this time (see recommendations in Chapter VIII), for purposes of estimating instrument operations it is assumed an MLS system is installed by 1985. With such a system, it is expected that instrument operations will rise sharply. A comparison of instrument operations at similar airports having ILS systems (Kitsap County Airport, Snohomish County Airport - Paine Field, Grant County Airport - Moses Lake, King County International Airport - Boeing Field, and 53 TABLE V-6 i ITINERANT AND LOCAL OPERATIONS Total Itinerant Local Percent Year Operations Operations Operations Itinerant 1967 185,237 79,614 105,623 43 1968 204,386 82,738 121 ,648 4o 1969 185,728 76,878 108,850 41 1970 149,563 64,536 85,027 43 1971 128,696 55,000 73,696 43 1972 121 ,680 55,000 66,680 45 1973 154,280 58,850 95,430 38 1974 137,201 57,566 • 79,635 42 1975 118,000 53,000 65,000 42 FORECASTS 1980 160,000 70,000 90,000 44 1985 100,000 83,000 97,000 46 1990 200,000 96,000 104,000 48 1995 200,000 100,000 100,000 50 1995* 220,000 110,000 110,000 50 * With Taxiway A relocated. Tacoma, Industrial Airport) indicates that their general aviation instrument operations range from 5 percent to 10 percent of their total and average ' about 7 percent. It is, therefore, estimated. that Renton's instrument oper- ations ;wi.1l equal 7.5 percent in 1985 with a gradual increase to 8.5 percent by 1995. See Table V-7. Busy Hour Operations The "busy hour" is defined as the average of the two adjacent peak hours of 54 • TABLE V-7 INSTRUMENT OPERATIONS RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT Total Instrument Percent Year Operations Operations Instrument 1967 185,237 1 ,070 0.6 1968 204,386 1 ,789 0.9 1969 185,728 1 ,822 1 .0 1970 149,563 1 ,724 1 .2 1971 128,696 1 ,271 1 .0 1972 121 ,680 1973 155,039 2, 104 1 .4 1974 ' 152,763 2,989 2.0 1975 118,000 3,089 2.6 FORECASTS 1980 160,000 6,40.0 4,o 1985 180,000 13,500 7.5 1990 200,000 16,000 8.0 1995 200,000 17,000 8.5 1995** 220,0.00 18,700. 8.5 Data not available. ' With relocation of Taxiway A. the 37th high activity day of the year. 1 Planning facilities to accommodate the "busy hour" traffic provides sufficient operational capability during 1 Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, Airport Master Plans , AC 150/5070-6, February 1971 . 55 approximately 90 percent of the time, yet does not create the unnecessary financial burdens of accommodating the highest peak hours of the year, During the twelve months from July 1974 through June 1975, the 37th busy day had 591 operations, and the peak hour average was 118 operations, The 37th active IFR day accounted for 14 instrument operations, with an estimated 4 in the busy hour. - Table' V-8 shows the current busy hour operations as a percent of the total . The anticipated busy hour percentages and the associated busy hour opera- tional forecasts are also indicated. TABLE V-8 BUSY HOUR OPERATIONS RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT Busy Hour Busy Hour Operations Annual Operations Percent of Annual Year VFR IFR Total IFR VFR/Total IFR 1972 115 2 121 ,68o .095 1973 128 4 155,039 2, 104 .083 . 1[90 1974 118 4 152,763 2,989 .077 . 1134 • -FORECASTS 1980 128 9 160,000 6,400 .08 . 14 1985 144 Ig 180,000 13,500 .08 . 14 1990 160 22 200,000 16,000 .08 . 14 1995 160 24 200,000 17,000 •08 . 14 1995** 176 26 220,000 18,700 .08 . 14 * Data not available. • • * With relocation of Taxiway A. 5h • fc d/ I I I rcc uiremen s ' :' 7 , � The demand/capacity comparisons described in Chapter V indicate the need for additional airport facilities between now and 1995. This chapter describes these facility requirements and the methodology by which they were determined. APRONS Apron area is required for both based and transient aircraft. Tie-down area requirements for the size of aircraft anticipated to be based at Renton Munici- pal through 1995 will average 300 square yards per aircraft tied down. 1 It is estimated that 50 percent of the based aircraft will require tie-down space. In addition, 360 square yards for each transient aircraft will be required.] 1 FAA planning standard, reference: Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, Utility Airports, An Access to National Trans- portation, AC 150/5300-4B, June 24, 1975. 58 On the basis of the forecasts of based and transient aircraft, the apron re- quirements shown in Table VI-1 were computed. The apron requirements in Table VI-1 include adequate space for the movement of aircraft. It does not, include apron area used for fueling and such activities as short-term loading and unloading. TABLE VI-1 APRON AND T-HANGAR REQUIREMENTS RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT Actual or . Estimated Capacity Requirement Item 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 Tie Down Spaces (Number) Based Aircraft Spaces 140 105 105 105 10,5 Transient Aircraft Spaces 10 16 16 16 16 TOTAL 150 121 121 121 121 Apron Area (Sq. Yds.) Based Aircraft Area 40,000* 31 ,500 31 ,500 31 ,500 31 ,500 Transient Aircraft Area 3,000 5,700 5,700 5,700 5,700 TOTAL 43,000 37,200 37,200 37,200 37,200 T-Hangars (Number) 53 105 105 105 105 * Includes Boeing Aircraft Company apron area subleased to Aero-Dyne. 59 HANGARS It is estimated that T-hangar spaces should be provided for approximately 50 percent of the based aircraft at the airport. This is based on current waiting lists for T-hangars and the anticipation that, in the future, the mix of aircraft based at the airport will be larger and, therefore, their owners would more likely desire hangar space. 53 of the 187 based aircraft (in 1975) -- only 28 percent -- are located in T-hangars. T-hangar re- quirements are shown in Table VI-1 . SEAPLANE FACILITIES Adequate facilities should be provided for the seaplane area. A floating dock should be provided for temporary tieing-up of aircraft. The dock should be equipped with skirts to contain any fuel spillage that might occur, and to prevent debris from the lake damaging aircraft taxiing in the mooring area. Also required is an improved ramp for launching seaplanes. A fueling dock should be provided. The dock, which can be served by stationary pumps connected to fuel storage tanks on the airport or by tank truck, must be designed to prevent fuel spillage from running into the lake. Expansion of the seaplane area to accomodate additional aircraft parking, Fi30 space, a marked and lighted waterlane, and auto parking will be dis- cussed under the analysis of alternative development concepts. RUNWAY Runway 15/33 ►s 5,379 feet in length with a 350 foot displaced threshold at the south end. In addition to accommodating all general utility aircraft, this length will accommodate 100 percent of the basic transport fleet1 at 1 The basic transport fleet consists of "business jets" or "corporate jets" and includes turbojet-powered aircraft up to 60,000 pounds gross weight. 60 i I 60 percent of useful load or 60 percent of the fleet at nearly 90 percent useful load. 1 Sixty percent of the basic transport fleet include the fo,llow- ing airplanes: Manufacturer Model Lear Jet Corporation Lear Jet 23 Lear Jet Corporation Lear Jet 24 North American Rockwell Corporation Sabreliner - 40 series North American Rockwell Corporation Sabreliner - 60 series General Aeronautics - Marcel Dassault Fan Jet Falcon (Mystere 20) Hawker Siddeley Aviation Ltd. HS-125 The runway will also accommodate departures under low load conditions of Boeing 707's and arrivals and departures of Boeing 727's and 737's. The existing runway can, therefore, adequately handle the types of aircraft forecast for the airport over the next 20 years. Expansion of the runway can only be accomplished to the north, over the water, and the high costs and environmental consequences would outweigh any benefits. The runway width, 200 feet, is more than adequate for current and future general aviation needs. If major rebuilding of the runway becomes necessary, reducing its width should be considered at that time. The load-bearing strength of the runway was surveyed in January, 1970, by the FAA. The gross load-bearing strengths were estimated to be equal or better than the following: 1 The runway length criteria is contained in: Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Airport Design Standards-General Aviation Airports-Basic and General Transport, July 14, 1969. 61 Single gear 100,000 lbs. Dual gear 135,000 lbs. Dual-tandum gear 225,000 lbs. These strengths are adequate to accommodate the entire basic transport fleet as well as the Boeing 707,727, and 737. Unless the Boeing Aircraft Company p y manufacturers a considerably heavier aircraft at the Renton plan,t, the runway will not need strengthening beyond its current capability. With minor exceptions, taxiway widths and strengths are also adequate. INSTRUMENTATION Because of the greater demands for instrument operations, a microwave pre- cision instrument approach system is recommended if it is proven practical for installation at Renton, based on further studies and technological im- provements.. Problems relating to approach obstructions, missed approaches, and the direction of the precision approach are discussed in the next chapter. LIGHTING AND MARKING Lighting requirements will include upgrading to a high intensity runway (HIRL) , and medium intensity taxiway light (MITL) system if the precision , instrument approach system is installed. Runway end identifier lights (REIL) will be required on Runway 33. Flood lights will be needed for apron, hangar and automobile parking areas. The runway markings must be changed to a "precision instrument runway" de- signation when such a system is installed. "Hold lines" should be painted, at, all taxiway/runway intersections. Routine maintenance should be carried out to ensure that all lighting is functioning and pavement markings are clearly visible. 62,` GROUND ACCESS Major traffic arterials serving the airport are Rainier Avenue on the west of the site and Airport Way on the south side. Rainier Avenue recorded 'a peak annual average daily traffic volume (AADT) of 24,500 vehicles per day in 1966 and Airport Way carried 35,000 vehicles per day in 1968. Since that time, traffic has declined to approximately 15,000 and 25,000 on , Rainier Avenue and Airport Way, respectively. Employment reductions at Boeing and the opening of Interstate 5 have caused these past decreases. Traffic improvements made after these peaks on both arterials have provided adequate traffic movement capacity, such that present traffic flow is below maximum capacity. These improvements include widening on both arterials and the installation of a computer traffic signal control system designed 4 .. to facilitate traffic movement. Based on the Puget Sound Council of Governments transportation planning estimates of total person trips, it is estimated by VTN that automobile traffic on Rainier Avenue and Airport Way in the vicinity of the airport will continue to decline. Overall , it is concluded that the traffic facili- ' ties in the vicinity of the airport are adequate at present and up to 1995. Entrances to the airport are provided at two major locations. At Airport Way and Shattuck Avenue, a signalized intersection provides two entrance and two exit lanes into the site. At the northwest corner of the site a four lane driveway entrance and exit is provided. The exit is stop sign controlled. These two locations are connected to a two-lane perimeter road constructed in 1973. Capacity analysis shows that under present traffic flow conditions during peak hours, the hourly capacity of the driveway entrance is 160 vehicles. This is based on an average acceptable gap of six seconds, and a peak hour' two-way volume of 1 ,350 vehicles per hour on Rainier Avenue. The capacity;; 63 ' of the signalized entrance and exit at Shattuck Avenue is more difficult to determine, due to the variable signal timing conditions controlled by the computer signal system. However, using assumptions representativeof volume conditions, the ratio of present volume to capacity for the exit from the airport during peak hour traffic, is calculated at approximately 0.65 based on level of service E, as defined by the Highway Capacity Manual , Special Report 87, Highway Research Board, 1965. This means that traffic could in- crease 35 percent above estimated conditions before overloading the inter- section. However, the capabilities of the signal control system are such that flow would be balanced to improve operating conditions in overloaded portions of the entire traffic signal system. With the decline in projected arterial volumes, access conditions to the airport should improve. , Based on present employment levels and the number of based aircraft, the ,i, average daily traffic generated by the airport is estimated at 970 vehicles per day, with a design hourly volume of 425 vehicles per hour. After 1985, hourly volume will reach 570 vehicles and daily traffic will reach 1 ,300.I This traffic generation level does not overload the access points to the airport, if less than 38 percent of the hourly volume utilize the northwest access point. It is doubtful that 160 vehicles, the estimated capacity of the northwest exit, would be employing this access point during the after- noon peak hour, that time when employees would wish to exit from the air port onto Rainier Avenue when it is at its peak traffic flow. With the 1 reserve capacity at the Shattuck Avenue exit, it is concluded that the.ex- isting access conditions are adequate for present and future levels of activity at the airport. Discussions with the Renton Traffic Engineer support this conclusion. t The current automobile parking capacity of the airport is approximately 932 spaces (Table V1-2) . The available parking area for general aviation users is adequate for existing needs but must be increased before 1985. Aircraft user requirements were estimated on the basis of the number of 64, based aircraft and transient airport users . Non-Boeing employee needs were determined from current airport employment plus an estimated additional 40 employees by 1985, for a new FBO and any increases of other employees . TABLE VI-2 AUTOMOBILE PARKING REQUIREMENTS RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT ESTIMATED REQUIREMENT PARKING AREA CAPACITY 1975 19$0 1985 1990 1995 Boeing Related 512 Non-Boeing Related: Aircraft Users 185 222 225 228 Employees 247 267 267 267 - r . Subtotal Non-Boeing 420 432 489 492 495 TOTAL AIRPORT 932 Boeing requirements are not available, but they are estimated to be less than 512 throughout the planning period. -- I Parking on the airport should be confined to designated areas. Furthermore, automobile access to aircraft areas should be severely restricted. All park- '+`; ing should be adjacent or close to the airport perimeter road. This will , eliminate, to the extent possible, the mixing of automobile and aircraft traffic in apron and taxiway areas. The 2-lane perimeter road will continue to provide adequate circulation throughout the airport. 65 II, i • � ail it " Ali Ijl • ill it i1 l r � illy l I' 111 11 covobomoni ,. cftcrhcflvos d 11 snit I II 'v y 'll • • I II. . � r I_I In assessing the future growth plans for the Renton Municipal Airport (and the associated seaplane base) , the key determinant is the role or mission that the airport/seaplane base is expected to play in the community. Three potentials exist. First is the potential of providing air carrier services to the area. Renton Municipal Airport has not provided this service, and the close proximity of Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (Sea-Tac) within one hour's driving time obviates the need to consider this role for the field. There does not appear to be a present or future need, therefore, for the Renton Municipal Airport to consider the provision of air carrier services„ to the area. Second is the potential for providing military facilities. Again, the present and past history of the activities at the airport do not support this type,of activity at the field, nor have there been any expressions of interest by the military services to use the airport. The role or mission of the field, 67 therefore, should not include a military mission in its planning. The third potential is to provide facilities for general aviation. It is in this role that the airport is presently, and has historically, operated. Not only does the field serve the traditional small general aviation aircraft, but it also services the air carrier type (or size) of aircraft. The P location of the Boeing manufacturing facility adjacent to the field indicates that the role or mission of the airport should be to provide airport facili- ties capable of accommodating the full range of aircraft sizes and types.' The seaplane base, however, need only provide facilities for the small gen- eral aviation types of aircraft. It can be concluded, therefore, that the present and future role of.the Renton Municipal Airport and the Wiley Post-Will Rogers Seaplane Base should be the accommodation of all types of general aviation aircraft, ranging in size from small single-seat aircraft to turbine powered business aircraft and be capable of handling the large multi-engine air carrier type aircraft produced by the Boeing Company. In support of this analysis, a check was made of the type of aircraft that are based at the facility now and their uses. Aircraft usage is fairly evenly divided between personal and revenue producing purposes. Slightly more than one-half of the based aircraft at the airport/seaplane base are used for ' pleasure (as reported to the Federal Aviation Administration on Form 8050-73) . The remaining aircraft are used for business, charter, instruction or other revenue uses. The importance of the business usage is emphasized by the fact that these aircraft are flown an average of 264 hours a year, against an average of only 128 hours a year for the pleasure aircraft. Trends in aircraft sizes over the past 15 years indicate that there is. a continuing shift towards larger general aviation types of aircraft (exclud- ing the Boeing aircraft) . With the increases in size (and complexity) of 68 it ` I the fleet mix, the use. of instrument landing aids is also being relied upon more and more.. These trends can be expected to continue. The importance of the Renton aircraft facility to the community was also explored. A check was made of the location of the based aircraft owners. Thirty percent of the owners are in the Renton area (zip code -98055) . With- in a five-mile radius of the airport there are about 80 aircraft owners, or 48 percent of those analyzed. Some owners live as far away as Anchorage, Alaska! The general area of influence extends to Bellevue on the north, to Issaquah on the east, to Kent on the south, and into the Cedarhurst/Beverly Park/Dunlap areas on the west. All of these areas are within the FAA's standard of a thirty-minute driving time. There are, however, aircraft owners based as far north as Lake Forest Park at the north end of Lake Washington. Fourteen aircraft owners were located completely outside the Seattle region. Two airports in the immediate Seattle area have precision landing aids to assist aircraft during adverse weather conditions. These are the Sea-Tac Airport and the King County International Airport. Both are within six miles of Renton. Sea-Tac is the major air carrier airport and does not encourage the basing of small general aviation aircraft at its facilities. King County International does have considerable general aviation facilities. Therefore, only' King County International can be considered as an IFR airport for regular general aviation use. The continuing shift towards business type aircraft, the increasing use of King County International 's IFR facilities, and inter- ,- , views with aircraft owners all indicate that Renton Municipal should have, some type of precision landing aid. AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT ISSUES As discussed in the Forecast Section of this report, there exists a substan- tial demand for airport facilities in the Seattle/Renton/Bellevue areas. Renton Municipal is incapable of meeting all the demand; therefore, the _ 69 1 ability to tie-down or hangar aircraft is a major issue in the development of the field. With limited space available, every possible acre that can' be utilized for parking of aircraft should be exploited. This would include the rehabilitation of Fixed Base Operator (FBO) areas as well . Runways and taxiways must be designed in such a manner that maximum utilization can be achieved. Runway instrumentation is the final major issue to be explored! Before discussing the alternatives for development of the facilities at the airport and the seaplane base, a short discussion of each of these issues ' is in order. In this manner, the full impact of each of the alternatives ' can be seen in light of the issues that face the ultimate development of the. airport. Aircraft Parking Areas The current shortage of aircraft parking and storage space is well known. The airport faces the choice of providing tie-down spaces or providing additional T-hangars. Because aircraft can be nested closer when tied-down, more spaces could be provided than if individual hangars are built. On the other hand, the T-hangars provide an additional measure of security, , and protect the aircraft from the weather. Some area is available on the_.;._- . -. east side of the field, and some reconfiguration of space can be achieved' •, on the west side. A method of gaining additional tiedown area would be to relocate Taxiway A closer to the runway. This approach would require a large investment, but would be economicaaly sound if Taxiway A would have to be substantially re- built anyway (see Chapter 8) . ,I . Another potential area for additional general aviation parking space is Boeing Apron "C", which is presently used very little by Boeing. Some of Apron "C" is currently being sublet for general aviation aircraft parking ;' the remainder would provide space for approximately 100 aircraft. The • Boeing lease for the Apron "C" area does not expire until 2010. Therefore, any further use of the area by general aviation will have to be made in agreement with Boeing. 70' Because of the surrounding limitations, the expansion of the airport into new territory is impossible without prohibitive costs. On the north is Lake Washington which cannot be considered for expansion because of envll,iron- mental and economic concerns. On the west is Rainier Boulevard and high terrain. On the south is Airport Way and extensive commercial development. On the east is the Cedar River and the Boeing property. A small strip of land on the east side of the river is vacant, but is to be dedicated for other public uses. . Any increase in aircraft parking capacity, therefore, must take place within the present confines of the airport property (with the•exception of a small parcel near the northwest corner of the field, discussed under Alternative 3) . FB0 Area Rehabilitation The rehabilitation or reconfiguration of the FBO area at the southeast corner of the field will yield only a minimal increase in aircraft storage space. Some economies can be achieved by replacing some obsolete facilities, and the redesign of some of the space, however, significant increases cannot be expected. . On the southwest corner the space available is severely limited. Some additional space .can .be gained by slight adjustments in the Aircraft Parking Restriction Line near the runway end..-._ .._ ___.... ii Along the east side of the field some redesign of areas will increase the aircraft parking spaces. One such area is now under development by Airport Specialties and will result in T-hangars for 29 aircraft. Some additional modifications can be achieved in adjacent property that will accommodate ''' some additional aircraft. On the northwest side of the field the new rest- aurant aurant lease will occupy some land, but with the removal of two old hangars and the reconfiguration of the remaining land, more aircraft parking areas are possible. Alternatives 2 and' 3, discussed later, explore the alternative of purchas- ing additional property northwest of the airport for expansion of the 71 1 I i rI r i seaplane facilities. Some floating mooring space, some ramp space, and: considerable on-shore aircraft parking space could be provided if the additional property were purchased. The ; FBO areas of the airport, therefore, will all need modifications in order to maximize the space available for aircraft servicing , storage and parking. Airfield Development On the airfield itself, some minor modifications will improve the facility's ability to handle aircraft. The improvement and addition of connecting taxi- ways will improve the access and egress to and from the runway. To gain additional aircraft parking space the west taxiway may be relocated ! closer to the runway. This option will be discussed in Chapter VIII . = 1 I , Instrumentation To provide a precision landing aid for the airport, the installation of a' microwave landing system (MLS) is desireable if such an installation proves feasible at Renton. The ramifications of this installation will be discus- __ ed in Chapter VIII . Since the flight clearance over Mercer Island requires that the glide slope be set near 4°, the use of this facility by aircraft larger than the DC-3, Martin 404, Convair 340, and turbin-powered business aircraft may not be feasible. All aircraft smaller than these should have no problem using the steeper approach angle. In fact, the new ILS install- ation at Van Nuys, California, is at an angle of3.9° and is proving to be very satisfactory. The Boeing air carrier-type aircraft might not be able to use the MLS facili- ty. These aircraft (Class D) do not now normally use glide slopes set in ' I excess of 3o. 72 , The Boeing Company has indicated that these types of aircraft rarely, if ' ever, return to Renton once they have left. A few are shuttled back in for modifications or specific repairs, but most that are manufactured at the Boeing plant will never return. When these aircraft are returned to the Renton facility (about three aircraft a year) they are flown in when the weather is VFR and most follow a route over the lake in approaching the field. AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT ALTERNATIVES '�-, . . Because of the many unusual conditions affecting the Renton Municipal Airport, the number of options available to the city for developing the airport and the seaplane base is limited. Four options can be discussed which are poss- ible, given enough time and/or money for development. 1.. Continue the facility "as is" (the do nothing approach) . 2. Add facilities to accommodate continuing, unlimited growth. 3. Provide for limited growth for airport and seaplane base within known capacity restraints. 4. Provide for limited growth for the airport and minimum improvements for the seaplane facility. There is no "ideal" solution to the development problem. Only intelligent choices can be made based upon the best analysis possible. It is apparent from the outset that all interested parties must be willing to adjust theiir aspirations to the practical limits that exist for this facility. Alternative 1 : Continue "As Is" The first option available to the city is to continue the operation of the' airport without making any major improvements. The airfield would be main- 73 tained, but no additions to runway, taxiways, or aprons would be made. The City would continue to lease property and would encourage the lessees to construct their own facilities and make other standard improvements. The City need not participate in these improvements. Because the airport prop- erty.would not be expanded, the areas available for leasing would remain, approximately what they are today. The airport presently accommodates approximately 190 based aircraft. This number would remain fairly stable, although the character of the fleet would still change over the years. Economic pressures would force the smaller „ aircraft out, and the business aircraft would predominate on the field. The field would continue to be predominately a VFR facility and (FR flying would continue to be accommodated at King County International . The seaplane activity would decrease because of the restaurant operation occupying land I presently used by the seaplanes to some degree. The Boeing manufacturing facility (which is capable of producing aircraft considerably larger than the Boeing 747) will not be affected by the general aviation fleet on the field and would continue to dispatch aircraft as is presently done. Alternative 2: Accommodate Unlimited, Continuing Growth At the other end of the spectrum is the alternative of expanding the airport to its maximum in an attempt to provide the capacity for total forecast de,- mand. The unconstrained forecast for based aircraft at Renton is 456 based aircraft in 1995, an increase of 269 over the current number. To provide for this number of aircraft would require land acquisition on the northwest side of the field, the utilization of areas now leased by Boeing, and, poss- ibly, the expansion of the airport across Airport Way. 7 ' 6 1 ' Further airport improvements would include the installation of the MLS system and its associated equipment, provided such an installation proves feasible at Renton. The seaplane facility would require the acquisition of approximately two acres of land northwest of the field, the marking and lighting of the water- lane, and the construction of two floating docks and a fueling dock. Inl addition, an auto parking area and maintenance hangar would be provided (see Figure VII-1 ) . - Under this alternative, aircraft operations would increase to about 340,000 a year, with a resulting increase in aircraft noise and air pollutants. This is also the most expensive alternative of those possible. The land acquisition costs would be extensive, and the construction of additional taxiways, aprons, and hangars to accommodate the increased number of aircraft based at the field would make this the highest cost option. Alternative 3: Constrained Growth for Airport and Seaplane Base The third and fourth alternatives both take into consideration the natural, and practical constraints that limit the growth potential for the facility. Investment in new facilities, and in land, is limited to the minimum nec essary to meet the practical number of based aircraft. Under this alterna- tive, land acquisition is limited to the expansion of the seaplane facility. Taxiways, aprons and other facilities are limited by the space constraints within the existing property line. It is estimated that 235 aircraft can be accommodated within the confines of the airport, provided that parts of the field are redesigned, and that the non-standard installations will not ' compromise safety. 75 FIGURE VII-1 SUGGESTED SEAPLANE BASE LAYOUT FOR ALTERNATIVES 2 AND 3 �l� 40/ f ,,,,,,,,:441 1 35 30 -.4� AUTO �, JARKI.N1G / f AREA 25 „:1 4 I I I0,EN l� i t5 i s ZEE' — SEAPLANE MAINTENANCE I < HANGAR, Q4N N p o AUXILIARY CONTROL .40 r^ TOWER LOCATION fl PEE P 01 ---- ' // , v %, / . BULKHEAD • •• � -1 1 I FLOATING DOCK 1 / I I•1*—WITH SKIRT (—I GATE CONNECTING DOCK TO BE II II I I TO AIRPORT VIA REMOVED RESTAURANT INNER HARBOR LINE PARKING LOT LING DOCK MOO��NG •BSTRUCTION LIGHT P I PRE CRASH RESCUE . I BOAT AREA 1 • I • I I OBSTRUCTION LIGHT I I i FLOATING DOCK RENTON I I WITH SKIRT , MUNICIPA j AIRPORT I I _AIRCRAFT 111 RAMP 'di , \ /II 0' 100' 200 76 I I'I Under this alternative, the major components of development are the improve- ments to the taxiway system, the installation of additional hangars and, aprons where possible, the installation of the MLS and its associated equ\ip- i ment, the upgrading of the lighting system as required by precision approach standards, the purchase of a parcel of land northwest of the airport for seaplane facilities, the marking and lighting of the waterlane, the install- ation of seaplane facilities, the redesign of a few FBO areas, and construc- tion of a restaurant facility on the airport (by the lessee) . Under this alternative, every portion of the airport is utilized for aircraft operations, storage or maintenance; for revenue producing installations; or for the pro- tection of navigational equipment. There will be little or no "excess" land available. Activity at the airport (and seaplane facility) will increase over present levels In 1976, there were approximately 120,000 aircraft operations (take- offs and landings) . With a based aircraft fleet of 235 aircraft, this level will increase to an estimated 220,000 annual operations. Although this large increase seems high when compared to recent trends, over the long- . term it represents a very constrained growth pattern. Many airports around the country will experience increases of three to four times present levels in the next twenty years. Renton, because it is constrained, will not in- _ crease significantly. The aircraft fleet mix will undergo a gradual change from the predominance of single engine aircraft to a much higher mix of multiengine business type aircraft. Th e Boeing manufacturing facility and operations will not be adversely affected by the increase in the general aviation fleet at Renton. Dispatch , of their aircraft will , in all probability, continue as at present. 77, CI Alternative 4: Limited Growth for Airport, Minimum Growth for Seaplane Facility The improvements contemplated for the airport in Alternative 3 above will be identical in this alternative. The improvements to the seaplane facility, however, will include only new ramps and a floating dock. The acquisition of the parcel of land northwest of the airport will not take place. The '' seaplanes based here will have access to the airport via a ramp at the lake's edge and will have to be moved over land to an on-shore parking area. This means that each parked seaplane would displace a parked land plane in the overall estimates. Under this alternative, seaplane activity is expected to increase very little, and the total number •of based aircraft (including seaplanes) would be 210. The reduced number of based aircraft would have' a corresponding reduction in the level of flight activity. Annual operations in 1995 would be approximately 200.000. Over the next 20 years it is expected that the shortage of space to park general aviation aircraft in the Renton area will become critical . An option under Alternative 4 which would help to overcome this shortage is to relocate Taxiway A closer to the runway. As discussed in Chapter 8, this option would gain approximately 80 spaces and increase the operations to an estimated 220,000. EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES The alternatives discussed above have been qualitatively and quantitatively evaluated against aeronautical , environmental and economic criteria. Some subjective analysis is also included. Aviation Demand and Capacity The 1995 aviation demand and airport capacity for each alternative are com- pared in Table VII-1 . In all cases, it is assumed that based aircraft areas would be filled to capacity. 78 Under the "do nothing" alternative, the level of operations is expected to slightly exceed the airport's PANCAP. Although annual operations in the past at Renton Municipal have been as high as 204,000, the current trends in rising prices of aviation fuel and other general aviation costs are pro- jected to have a long-term effect on the amount of general aviation flying. Delays to aircraft departures and landings would reach approximately 1 .9 minutes per operation. The cost of these delays -- in terms of increased fuel , crew time, etc. -- is estimated at $1 .50 per operation. Under the "unlimited growth" option, airport operations would far exceed the capacity of the field. Because the airport would be exceeding its practical operational capacity by such a margin, delays to aircraft would rise to over 10 minutes on the average. At an estimated cost of $8. 10 per • takeoff or landing, delays at this level would be unacceptable. Some measures could be taken to reduce delays, such as eliminating training operations or allowing them only during off-peak periods. However, these actions would not be enough to allow the airport to operate efficiently. The "constrained growth" and "no seaplane improvement" alternatives would result in operational levels slightly below the airport's practical capacity. Although delays would be greater than today, they would not be sufficient to preclude the airport from continuing to operate at that level of activity. Airspace Two alternative developments at the airport would affect the existing air- space patterns. First is the marked and lighted waterlane. By confining seaplane operations to a designated landing area parallel to the existing runway, water and land operations could be conducted simultaneously. Sea • - plane operations are not now confined to a designated area but generally 79 TABLE VII-1 COMPARISON OF DEMAND AND CAPACITY OF AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT ALTERNATIVES 1995 ALTERNATIVE ALTERNATIVE ALTERNATIVE ALTERNATIVE ALTERNATIVE 4 1 2 3 4 WITH (DO (UNLIMITED (CONSTRAIN- (NO SEAPLANE TAXIWAY A DESCRIPTION NOTHING) GROWTH) ED GROWTH) IMPROVEMENTS) RELOCATED DEMAND Based Aircraft 200 456 235 210 290 Annual Operations 190,000 340,000 220,000 200,000 220,000 CAPACITY Based Aircraft 200 456 • 235 210 290 PANCAP 175,000 190,000* 190,000* 175,000 - 175,000 DELAYS Minutes per Operation 1 .9 10. 1 2.3 2.3 2.9 Cost per Operation $1 .50 $8. 10 $1 .80 $1 .80 $2.30 * The PANCAP has been adjusted to account to the added capacity resulting from seaplane operations being conducted on a designated water lane parallel to and off-set from the runway. 80 i I ' r o occur in the west channel of the lake.. Furthermore they are not under tower control . A waterlane with an established traffic pattern and under tower control would improve the flow of air traffic.. A second development affecting airspace patterns would be the installation of a precision instrument approach system. A precision approach would bring an immediate increase in instrument operations, and by 1995, instrument operations would total 17,000, compared to about MOD in _1975... -Although the„ increased level_ of instrument operations would place a somewhat greater burden on air traffic controllers, safety in the area would not be compromised. Environmental Considerations Table VII-2 shows thevarious environmental impacts which are of significance for each alternative. The impact to air quality from each alternative and the proposed action shows an overall improvement. Though aircraft operations are forecasted to increase, emissions will be reduced significantly. This is due to federal legislation requiring a reduction in the emission character- istics of aircraft engines. Overall the unlimited growth alternative is fore- casted to be the worst air polluter of those examined. The "no seaplane" and the constrained growth alternatives are about comparable. The "do nothing" alternative would result in the lowest air pollution emissions. Noise impacts from the increase in aviation activity is also shown. The majority of population impacted by noise results not from general aviation flight activity but from the Boeing Commercial Aircraft Company preflight checkout and jet tuning procedures. These were estimated to be constant for each alternative. Again, the unlimited growth alternative impacts the area the greatest. , Alternatives 2 and 3 with major seaplane facility improvements are expected to result in increasing seaplane activity and resulting noise impacts along the Lake Washington shoreline. 81 In the social and human environment sector, the two activities which impact are the constrained growth and the unlimited growth alternatives. The dis- placement of the greatest amount of population and housing results from the unlimited growth alternative. The "do nothing" and "no seaplane improve- ments" alternatives require no displacement of people. Other environmental impacts associated with the unlimited growth alternative include compounding effects of increased expansion of the airport alongjthe Lake Washington shoreline, increased air pollution as compared to otherIalter- natives additional traffic generation, and compounding effects of increased storm runoff directly to the Cedar River and Lake Washington from aircraft parking areas. A beneficial impact of this alternative is the flexibility of instrument approaches during foul weather and evenings. This will result in a few more nighttime operations which would be an adverse impact due'l' to noise generation. Environmental impacts from the "do nothing" alternative are generally in- direct or secondary. These are the increase in air pollution from the poss- ible increase in traffic generation resulting from longer trips to and from other seaplane bases and airports, and possible economic losses resulting from the forfeiture of commercial activity associated with general aviation. There will be no displacement impacts, no increase in employment, no con- struction impacts, or no benefits to the general aviation segment of air transportation due to the failure to make needed improvements, Failure to improve the operational capacity of the seaplane base may result in the ;con- sumption of additional energy due to a shift in seaplane activity to other more distant areas on Lake Washington. In addition, boater-seaplane safety conflicts will remain with uncontrolled operation of seaplane activity. The primary benefit of this alternative is that displacement of people will not have to occur as in the constrained growth and the unlimited growth ; alternatives. 82 1 Economic Factors of the Alternatives Table VII-2 compares pertinent data concerning various economic character- istics of the constrained growth and other alternatives. Existing economic conditions are presented as a baseline for comparison purposes. All costs are presented in 1976 dollars. The "do nothing" alternative has no initial development cost associated with ' it and delays would be less than under the other three alternatives. Second- ary economic impacts such as increased ground transportation costs from the failure to provide for the latent demand of these services, the reduction in rental revenues to the city, and more directly, the loss of jobs and economic benefits from an increased labor force do need to be considered. i The unlimited growth alternative has an estimated capital cost of over 5.8 million dollars. This is about 3.5 million dollars above the estimated cost of the constrained growth alternative. A large part of this difference is the cost of land ($822,500) which must be obtained for expansion of the air- port. The purchase and installation of the MLS system is estimated at $250,000 (the cost of which would be incurred by the FAA) and the construction of additional T-hangars for protection of 30 percent of the increase in the 'number of based aircraft is estimated at $689, 100 (most of which would be constructed by private capital ) . Other costs are for site preparation, ,con- struction of another bridge across the Cedar River, two maintenance hangars, construction of tie-down areas and expenses associated with the relocation of the displaced population. Overall , this alternative is the highest cost. However, it provides the highest level of employment. The cost of delays is also the highest because the runway capacity is greatly exceeded. In reality, a new runway should be provided to handle the total latent demand of 456 based aircraft. However, no land is feasibly available to expand for the construction of a new runway. Therefore, delays wil1 ' be 83 encountered far above what would be normally acceptable. This is expressed in the high cost associated with delays. The "no seaplane improvements" alternative is approximately $700,000 less ex- pensive than the constrained growth alternative. This difference is the in- vestment required to expand the seaplane base and construct the marked and lighted waterlane. The estimated annual cost of delays is about nine percent lower and the estimated direct airport employment is 19 man-years less than the constrained growth. Community Benefits Renton Municipal Airport serves the City of Renton and surrounding community in a unique way. It affords the pleasure and student flyers convenient ,l;access to safe, well-maintained facilities. More impotently, however, the airport benefits the entire community by offering aviation services to businesses who collectively employ thousands of people in the Renton area. The largest • of these, Boeing, alone employs over 12,000 in the Renton area. It is obvious that the prosperity of the community is very dependent upon the continuance of adequate aviation facilities at Renton Municipal Airport. The question remains, then, which course of airport development will best serve the interests of the entire community. Obviously since Boeing plays such a large role at the airport and in the community, its use of the field should not be compromised. At the same time, the field must serve other users in the area. Under the "do nothing" approach the quality of facilities at Renton would not keep pace with future needs. If the airport continues 'to maintain the role of serving as much of the local aviation demand as practical , it will encourage new business activity and provide adequate facilities 'Ifor private users. To adequately serve all aviation users, the airport must pro- vide adequate hangar and tie-down space. Although not as important as land- based facilities to most airport users, seaplane facilities are also a necessity for many businesses in the Renton area. 85 - TABLE VII-2 COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVE AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT PLANS AERONAUTICAL FACTORS ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS ECONOMIC FACTORS DEMAND CAPACITY NOISE IMPACTS AIR QUALITY DISPLACEMENT ANNUAL ACRES RELATIVE DESIGN ALTERNATIVE PRACTICAL HOURS POPULATION WITHIN ANNUAL RANKING POPU- . HOUSING EST. ANNUAL YEAR ACTION ANNUAL ANNUAL RATIO OF OF WITHIN 30 25 NEF EMISS. OF LATION UNITS CAPITAL DELAY DIRECT BASED OPERA- CAPACITY- DEMAND/ DELAY NEF ISOLINE ISOLINE (TONS) CONCENT- RELO- DIS- COST COST EMPLOY- AIRCRAFT TIONS OPERATIONS CAPACITY (1990 PROJ.) (a) (b) RATION GATED PLACED (c) (c) MENT 1975 EXISTING CONDITIONS 187 118,011 175,000 0.69 800 918 782.2 1311,7 1.00 0 0 0 4 381, 1995 DO NOTHING LATERNATIVE 200 190,000 175,000 1.09 _ 6000 902 1056.5 285.5 0.22 0 0 0 285 391 1995 UNLIMITED GROWTH 456 340,000 190,000 1.79 57200 959 . 1164.4 657.5 0.50 187 97 5853 2754 475 1995 CONSTRAINED GROWTH 235 220,000 190,000 1.16 8400 910 1071.9 327.8 0.24 50 30 2342 396 437 1995 NO SEAPLANE IMPROVEMENTS 210 200,000 175,000 1.14 7700 902 1056.5 300.1 0.23 0 0 1620 360 418 1995 OPTIONAL DEVELOPMENT 290 220,000 175,000 1.26 10800 902 1071.9 327.8 0.24 50 30 2342 396 437 (Relocated Taxiway) (a) Does not Include noise Impact areas on Lake Washington from seaplanes - no land area impacted. • (b) Includes CO, HO, and NOx only, data not available to compare solid particulates and S02. • (c) 1976 dollars X 103. 3. The environmental consequences associated with expanding the seaplane facilities and installing a lighted waterlane are unacceptable to nearby residents. It is felt that the added noise of increased sea- plane operations will outweigh the benefits. The next chapter discusses the detailed airport plans which have been develop- ed on the basis of these conclusions. • 87 CONCLUSIONS On August 31 , 1976, a public hearing was held in Renton to receive testimony relevant to alternative airport expansion plans. At that meeting, it was recommended by the City and their consultants that Alternative 3 be adopted. Testimony presented by the public at the hearing, however, unanimously opposed any land acquisition for the expansion of seaplane facilities and a marked, lighted waterlane. Various reasons were given for their disapproval , most of which were related to the anticipated increase in seaplane activity and the associated noise. On the basis of testimony presented at the hearing and thorough consideration of all relevant factors, it was concluded that the best development option for Renton Municipal Airport i5 a course of constrained growth of the airport facilities with minimum seaplane improvements (Alternative 4) . Under a con- strained growth plan, existing FBO areas will be rennovated where needed. A seaplane dock and new ramps will be constructed in the northwest corner 'of the field, but no land will be acquired and no marked waterlane will be built. Additional tie-down and hangar space will be obtained from existing airport property where available. Furthermore, a MLS precision instrument approach system will be installed if it proves feasible. The following reasons provide the basis for selecting the constrained growth action: 1 . The City of Renton is obligated to provide adequate aviation facilities to the community. Based aircraft areas should be expanded to reason- able limits in an attempt to satisfy aviation needs. 2. Unconstrained expansion of the airport is impractical from, both,, economic and environmental standpoints. The development costs would not justify the benefits. Also the limited airfield capacity would cause delays to be unreasonably high. 86 lir 'r ril I11 • croort oan to 117 A 41::• TrItir:".",7!:no!tlia0:2?"1,1KT Atai..4•014.-ah I Renton Municipal Airport comes very close to being fully developed. There is little land available for new development, and there are only a few areas where old structures need to be removed to make way for a better use of the land. The mission of this facility - to accommodate all types of general aviation aircraft - can be fulfilled by implementing Alternative 4. This is not an easy task since there are a limited number of options available to carry out this mission. Land planes and helicopters can be accommodated on the Renton Muncipal Airport, and seaplanes can be accommodated -- to a limited extent -- with existing seaplane facilities. The long-term development of the airport must take into consideration the changing character of the general aviation fleet. Not only are aircraft becoming more reliable in the manufacture of airframes and engines, but the sophistication of the electronics is almost unparalleled. Over the next 89 twenty to twenty-five years, the technological improvements to aircraft can be expected to continue. An airport is not simply a piece of real estate,, dedicated to landing and taking off of aircraft, but rather represents a service center catering to the full spectrum of aviation's needs. This means the airport must be capable of helping aircraft land and takeoff in all types of weather conditions, it must provide facilities for aircraft storage (in- doors and outdoors) , it must provide facilities or locations for commercial businesses to fuel , repair, maintain, sell , rent, charter, and build aircraft, and it must offer opportunities for businesses to provide a full range of services to the pilots, aircraft owners, and aircraft passengers. To accomplish this, the aviation industry is assisted by the federal, govern- ment, the state and local governments, and by private industry. Each plays its role in support of this essential industry. This master plan study is part of the city's fulfillment of its responsibilities to the aviation industry. This master plan is designed to research the present and future needs of the aviation industry. as it exists in the Renton area, and to provide proper ,facil- ities to accommodate those needs. In the sections which follow, the various modifications, facilities and in- provements that have been incorporated into the master plan will be discussed. In preparing this master plan, the consultants have discovered that there; are very few options open for major development. Most of the improvements are of a "fine tuning" nature and relate to better utilization of space. Nevertheless, a number of improvements have been incorporated into the plan, and thoselIim- provements should allow the city to fulfill its obligations to provide the best possible facilities within the constraints of the site. The Airport Layout Plan, Figure VIII-1 , indicates the recommended improvements, 90 Ir ,.!..'r e.rs nm.c all zv ç ;4il ob. li CAI ice' %7 1: 1I \ l= .., I ^-4 - --.. ii(4. - - ' ! i. •� r; •A 0 1 *f ! • r' ? 'si',lE % ,i 'r ., 1-,. �•- ,g am 9 jl rI j� Iml Ate . VICINITY MAP grar.l Id IO Izl lil• r F W " , J ! < I ,c1®11 I741 wi lyl IC, Y1 4. '• - 1 ' - I 1 121 6- 1.' l! IA, ' M . , - I., ICTI I,'s`..., . I RESTAURANT •'1 L ... ixi i? SITE :. L.' i=J L. -- — G It SEAPLANE.PARKING LBRL I'III •- RAMP • ,tit ! LLL �� N _ -�A• . -•AMP T '.,�' .4 I • © GC-s�G T' oVEA�-~ j,- pI - SEAPLANE ACCESS i i�w STRU�Tf ppp.n EI RAMP r ! , IOO�II ,. I I '� -I -BRL ' I / ::;,/,`_.1 • t- _ el.I9.9 AJRPORT4I J _�- — ' SERVICE ISAi ,P _ith10 m �- Or'ROAD -� ''' :} ti- _ ;,_. IOOr .s?1 g> V: ^ A AIRCRAFT BRIDGE °"".� �+ /T FOR BOEING USE R..�,f • . ,':LA �� ED. ANTEN - OBST FVCTFON I; BARRIE- - el 26,=� r� , J �' ��I�.LIGHT,�Sm. 1; e1.2B.8' I I I l f".'r'7L I�)��_- OTE AM Cl -r CTI� .,� ., •- .1 r. `.I �1 LOG BOOMS v I • sl - MLS r.�~ CCRR H/ 'BUILDING { k. ., . p , III i-o a CLE6LRAN E_¢I'E SCUE j0 BE I X..� � , -I - L - �.AR.EF •�'� FAC161 REMOVEU_I . . IRPOfT W '� ' Jt •+ ACCES TO ______ BRL - / �' RT- r MOVEAB ` �•'t „aiJ �''[, STRUCTU , , "�` i •r• `�'_ UNDERWATER :�'"�I D �. ING_ ;, ,_ RAMP 4 K , , 144 UFACTURIN �. i I��/^ly ',1 LITI��� ,�... '' . : +w_ I \AREA P ,f - - y I l+\ G ' Y R '�• n.a • ( wv •� �./J -� \ - TRUE NORTH r• Ry.' •,� MgOryErcdii!- i1,, ' '1J' • - O 200 A00 ' ' l.'tJ�W-1 r .. • Seale in Feel ,41111r . w{+ iC1 • SUBMITTED BY: w .�. �•'" , Y YIY oshington ENGINEERS PLANNERS "31D%Sl q - T, HI�• APPROVAL BLOCK BASIC DATA TABLE ' 1 - l 0 RUNWAY DATA L4 NO. REVISIONS BY APP. DATE RUNWAY 15-33 I ^.� a" ' EXISTING ULTIMATE RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT PERCENTAGE WIND COVERAGE 0.165 SAME U. ~ WILL ROGERS-WILEY POST MEMORIAL SEAPLANE INSTRUMENT RUNWAY NONE SAME , •-�.� '• BASE PAVEMENT STRENGTH 0 1350,225DT SAME "i* `� , I R EN TON,WASHINGTON APPROACH SURFACES 20:1 34:' - AIRPORT LAYOUT PLAN ' RUNWAY MARKING NON-PRECISION MST PRECISIONINSTfl. I ' MINWAY LIGHTING MEDIUM INTENSITY SAME TAXIWAY LIGHTING MEDIUM INTENSITY SAME - NAVIGATI0NAL AIDS VAS,-2 VASI-2,MLS VirT I WashIngt on RUNWAY LENGTH SOTS' SAME IFR _ ENGINEERS PLANNERS RUNWAY WIDTH . 200' SAME ( IOQ.0% _ _ • 9 9.8% DESIGNED BY: R.Crolle a S.Allison TRACED BY: I.gamic a p.neale • • DRAWN BY' I.gara,a a p.neale CHECKED By:-S. Allison #VALUES GIVEN ARE THE GROSS WEIGHT IN 1,000 LOS. FOR DUAL ID)AND DUAL-TANDEM(DT) DUGH DECEMBER !I, SHEET I OF 2 SHEETS GEAR AIRCRAFT. SCALE AS SHOWN ' FIGURE VIII-I FIELD MODIFICATIONS Runway Length For Renton Municipal Airport, the length of the runway is fixed by the lilmit- ations of the site. The runway is physically 5,379 feet long , with a dis- placed threshold of 350 feet at the south end. ' Runway Width The width of Runway 15/33 at Renton Municipal is 200 feet. This is an accept- able width, even though it is in excess of current standards for airports of this size. The master plan recommends that this width be maintained. However, when extensive rehabilitation of the runway is required, consideration should be made at that time to reduce the runway width to about 150 feet. This will depend upon the requirements for Boeing production aircraft. Taxiway "G" This small taxiway on the west side of the field connects the parallel Taxiway "A" with the runway. In its present configuration it is seldom used and serves only a few aircraft, however, it is located 2,700 feet from the north threshold and is in an excellent location for an angled taxiway. This taxiway, there- fore, is recommended for removal and replacement with an angled taxiway i(with lights) in the position shown on the Airport Layout Plan. Taxiway "F" This is a small (25 feet) stub taxiway connecting the runway with the T-hangar and tie-down area on the east side of the field. The taxiway is centrally located with respect to the area it serves, but should be widened to 40 feet to accommodate the aircraft using these facilities. It should also be Lighted with blue taxiway lights. Taxiway "M" and "N" New angled taxiways should be installed to provide access to the east hangar area. ; 92 Taxiway Lights In addition to adding lights on Taxiways "F" and "G" mentioned above, some' additional lights are needed along Taxiway "A", and alongside Taxiways "C",; and "J". These should all be on the same lighting circuit. Runway Lighting Runway 15/33 is presently using Medium Intensity Runway Lights (M1RL) . Theis is the proper type of lighting for a non-precision runway, but the runway lighting must be upgraded to High Intensity Runway Lighting (HIRL) if an MLS system is installed. The runway threshold lights, which now emit a green light in each direction of approach, should be changed to the split-filter type, whereby the green side faces the approach to the threshold, and the red side faces the runway. This change conforms to the new standards in Advisory Circular 150/5340-24,, dated September 3, 1975, and would apply to the medium intensity system now install- ed and; to any future high intensity system. "' Runway Marking Runway 15/33 is currently painted with Non-Precision Instrument Runway marks consisting of 1) threshold bars, 2) runway numerals, 3) centerline stripes, and 4) displaced threshold bar at the south end. Arrows indicating a displaced threshold should be added at the south end. INSTRUMENTATION AND APPROACHES As mentioned earlier in this report, Renton Municipal has radar approaches to Runway 15 and Runway 33 with minimums as low as 900 foot ceilings and one mile visibility. It is possible to have lower minimums at the field, but this will require the installation of precision landing equipment. Standard instrument landing system (ILS) equipment is not expected to work at the airport because of the terrain and siting problems. 1 Preliminary, private tests with a microwave landing system (MLS) indicate' that 93 the terrain and siting problems do not affect the operation of this equipment, and a satisfactory installation can be made. However, further tests must be conducted by the FAA to prove the practicality of the system and to establish siting criteria, approach slopes and other standards. The master plan has reserved a site for co-located MLS localizer and glide slope equipment, and has indicated the zone in front of this equipment which must be kept clear of any improvements. The configuration of this protected area was obtained from representatives of Tull Aviation Co. , one of the makers of MLS equipment. The identification of equipment, and the reservation of a site for it on the airport does not, however, guarantee that the lowest possible minimums will be obtained. The two major elements that must be studied are the approach zones and the missed approach areas. The obstacles or obstructions which may exist in these areas determine, for the most part, the minimums that will be approv- ed for the airport. At Renton, two situations exist which preclude the FAA approving the lowest possible minimums. The first situation is the presence of Mercer Island north of the field. The trees on the south end of the island - and indeed part of the island itself - penetrate the standard approach surface associated with a precision landing aid. This standard approach surface (50: 1 for the first 10,000 feet, and 40: 1 for the next 40,000 feet) has been modified for Renton, and has been established at 34: 1 for the entire 50,000 foot distance.* (See Figure VIII-2,. Approach and Clear Zone Plan. ) Even with the 34: 1 modified approach slope, a portion of the island at the :south end penetrates the slope, and will affect the angle at which aircraft fly the glide slope to the runway. To comply with the clearance requirements in TERPS, the approach slope must be raised to 28: 1 to clear the trees on Mercer Island, and this, in turn, requires that the glide slope be set at an For a detailed explanation of these criteria, see the United States Standard for a Terminal Instrument Procedures (TERPS) . 94 • li ;'ttu:. • HORIZONTAL SCALE: I°=2r i OBSTRUCTIONS 300 ...;a > : ':: : :;::i::, I; {ICE IN SOUTHWEST CORNER OF FIELD ADJACENT '''?'� 0'"s<'?s^111:11's's'>»'N 11 BLAST SHIELD PENETRATES PRIMARY SURFACE (EL.35) <::;::: r;;:::::.;:.;::••::•::: N iTRUCTION LIGHTED BLAST SHIELD (EL. 501) E1111 ' 310X:1g11`S' [ 11::,: N •:#?I.11i:>::yl :Eiln:ii;a:,. \ IaD (EL.28'+15'=-43.5') :K20o :<';::v::,'::; >::>::zC°:>:%:::<>:»2«::<•:_< :'>:<!: \ RTMENT BUILDING (EL.55') .. I LD LNG (EL. 5 '5 ES EL. 60') 100 - - - 'E S EL. 55' I OOL BUILDING EL I 05 ES EL. mo.) < NSMISSION I TOWER 4 EL 167' E( SEE NOTE B , . :. ___, ...,,,... , ,_,7.,„ �T ,. •. _•.,.....-:,- , _-,r t fly_ r - ♦f',, ,_,_•, ,,,,„ ,�I' - .•1-•: ., 7 ,� ,i ~, � 1., �..E OF R/W PROFILES • 300' '�-�I� p \ �. �! I ra'.4 j,„2. �L�Cl/�'At°� �.VERT. I"=100' • I� \ OC11-III\ _:�'` __.p!I .• )•1 _ .� � •_NOR!Z. I".1,000' 1 +-_--_-_-- -,� �°� -�• CH HORIZONTAL SURFACE ELEV.17 I ___-_ _� .rm__ ��'/,./9'�r• _ , \�, PROP I. p-" C �F. 2 ! R/ er__� 'f/_-• T." 3••.' I ir? 1..' AT `.4 •. r.• r )I 1yyy���- - 1:2 �1S..;. �- MERCE 1 1�� ISLAND -�• h! - a + -;j,.l___ __ 1, ,� � E. AKE SURFACE 1 7 �..y' fff -jam 1 .. (rl >, 'v 1 IMF" F.;Ilm 0+ D� I '�''_-_---- „-�;��1 �8 .� WI 4000 6000 8000 10,00U 4• !III i- i_0 - R)_, @° I I it II- I B; ___ 3411 APPROACH SURFACE _ E. 3,"_`-�i ��-TO DISPLACED THRESHOLD �'Y __ k�_• i ___ari'. 31 I,I +- _d 1--co S49P4c NOTE ' ,1 !L 'y ! F OII APPROACH I J � II I---_:''�' / •URFACE ELEV. 179 it SLOPE TO •. _ <- lr BLAST SHIELD GHQ ___.. f.:. ' ,.)-^ -I lI \ , �APHROA 11 � 1 �'/I'q _ � Q P SUR8EL.3 " I -- �', Nl'1 D - \\�� \ l r�•' . EL29' r �j ,�,.•�,a`- ti`- ' r ' t>.. +��` a . '®I:'�.: P'-�,T cr a �„`? ._!Z pRy r � �'.�0 �t- _ --- --�_--�� vim: sAoo 4,000 2Aoo ' r•''' "`' J_ - J71. 'A CLEAR ZONE ee s�I '�. k s � SUBMITTED BY: V�Iy WoshIngton ENGINEERS PLANNERS , Viv, ,r 1 ei S - ,�1 4 APPROVAL BLOCK oTON- Cam. +' , V`vT0- 0 �, h r' 'rh'R<•Ae"t".-, r-A6't' i d Ci,,, 7T,;+^ AND '` m it: C�e"�. z °`#`, se • ION, 2 7 '►, ,mayiitisi,off /' °�'w S.+l" 1[ _ -- 6 OUT M yI� . ;-' , UTICAL r - ' [HST"" r l p r°'.g" I ' UTI I' I 'f'`,„::„.,e_ �`.,: FECT NO. REVISIONS BY APP. DATE it 1L _jr •' ,t,.,;ry�,, :;- 1, ,/:. :, /,�•TE RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT �" ! A+'fif�=Y'�.,; .s,C°.»,.�-.'.a '.:. !' J,1_ TER I - ,,,,='••• h;:' -(1-Ji;i•9,PS-1-.,)S.,Lti`_.:.';''' NETT, WILL ROGERS WILEY POST MEMORIAL SEAPLANE " "" BASE 1 —�� `3-<)J ' " l.r t� RENTON,WASHINGTON • !=--- j � � :t : ,, : APPROACH`2 �L ,f ':l , AND CLEAR ZONE PLAN ipi .� [ - ,•.Cl-_..... �I ., ,vor"c:, .: —tM0thI89Ro0 .. . ...,.,f ___-- - ENGINEERS PLANNERS ! DESIGNED BY: R.Crolle'd S.Allison TRACED!'BY: p.neck • DRAWN BY: p.min CHECKED BY: S.Allison ' SHEET OF SHEETS SCALE' AS SHOWN FIGURE VIII-2 I ' 1 angle greater than the standard mzimum of 3°. Calculations indicate that an angle between 3.5° and 4° (depending upon the clearance required) will permit aircraft to execute an approach to Runway 15. For comparison, the ILS installation at Van Nuys, California, has been set, at 3.9° and is proving to be satisfactory to users of that field. Conversations with pilots, airport personnel and control tower personnel reveal that no problems are being •encountered and that safety has not been compromised. All aircraft, up to and including heavy twin engine aircraft, should have no problem executing an approach with the glide slope set at 4°. Contact has been made with the manufacturers of general aviation aircraft, and none have indicated any problems associated with an approach angle of 4°. Jet aircraft of all sizes would need to be field checked to verify that the approach angle of 4° (or maybe slightly less) would not impose any undue flight maneuvers when approaching the threshold. Approval of these aircraft to use the MLS system at Renton should await actual flight tests. It must be clearly understood that the adequacy of the approach slopes and glide angles which are described here will depend on the actual requirements of the MLS. Because of environmental and economic considerations, the installation of an Approach Light System into Lake Washington has not been included in the master plan. The lack of this equipment would indicate that the lowest possible'; minimums which could be obtained would be 250 foot ceilings and 3/4 mile visibility. This, however, is not possible, since obstacles in the missed approach area are the controlling factor in determining the lowest minimums for Renton Municipal . The hills and towers located to the south and west of the airport are the controlling obstructions, and dictate that the lowest minimums which will be approved for the airport are 500 foot ceilings and 3/4 mile visibility. A detailed study of the missed approach procedures, and possible adjustments of the missed approach flight paths, by FAA specialists 96 1 ' may permit the minimums to be set somewhat lower, but this cannot be guaranteed. The intermediate approach area (see TERPS for details) may have altitudes es- tablished between 1 ,800 feet and 2,200 feet MSL. This being the case, the location of the Outer Marker for the precision approach system would be located on Mercer Island between 24,000 feet and 32,000 feet from the runway threshold. Since the Outer Marker is a very small radio transmitter, it can be located in such a manner that it will be compatible with any neighborhood. The Middle Marker, however, is another problem. With the higher glide slope angle of 4°, the location of the Middle Marker would be in Lake Washington. Placing the Middle Marker on a floating platform is possible, but makes main- tenance difficult. With a somewhat lower glide slope angle, closer to 3.50, the Middle Marker may possibly be located at the edge of Mercer Island. The exact location will be determined at the time the final decisions are made on the glide slope installation. When the glide slope is established for the airport, the Visual Approach Slope Indicator lights (VASI ) for Runway 15 will also need to be adjusted to make them compatible with the glide slope installation. OTHER FACILITIES There are several other features to the master plan that affect the aircraft operating areas of the airport and seaplane base. A careful review was made of each of the buildings on the field, the paved surfaces, the auto roads and parking lots, the fuel storage facilities, and miscellaneous items. In several cases, modifications to the facilities could be identified that would improve the flow of traffic, increase storage facilities, or result in other improvements, but the leases on these parcels extend well beyond the planning period for this master plan. In this case, suggestions have been made for some of the more important items, and in other cases, the items have been left for future analysis. 97 There, is only one situation that affects many leases that is considered toibe a safety item. This is the ability of autos to have unlimited access to the aircraft operating areas. There are numerous gates around the field through which vehicles can gain access to—the field, and in many areas autos actually park on the aircraft aprons. This is particularly true in the Boeing lease area and the Robertson Aircraft area. This is a major policing problem, and in the event of a major happening on the field, an unlimited number of autos could swarm over the aircraft operating areas. Such an event could be positive (such as the arrival of a dignitary) or negative (such as an aircraft accident) . The only surface vehicles that should have access to the aircraft operating areas are those with radio connection to the control tower, those equipped with approved flags, and those driven by persons familiar with the field rules and aircraft operating characteristics. The master plan has provided for a perimeter fencing plan that eliminates open access to the field, identifies those areas reserved for aircraft purposes, and classifies those roads which should be for limited access by vehicles with permits only. Within the Boeing lease Area "A", no internal fenceshave been shown, but the Boeing Company should provide some methods of parking areal restraint to control access to the field from their vehicle areas, as long as such controls do not impact upon their operations. Aircraft Operating Areas Suggested modifications or improvements to the aircraft operating areas of the airport and seaplane areas have been indicated on the airport layout plan, Some are relatively minor, others are major. In each instance the objective has been to improve safety of operations, increase capacity, or improve the efficiency of the system. 1 . Southeast Corner In the vicinity of Aero-Dyne, paved areas have been designated as aircraft operating areas, with the exception of some auto parking spaces. All vehicles permitted on this area should have .a permit and the drivers be familiar with aircraft operating characteristics. An unnumbered building, 98 ' II used as a storage shed, located adjacent to the fuel farm should be removed, the area cleaned up and used for outside aircraft tie-downs. Other areas have been designated as auto access and parking areas. These should be clearly identified by signs, and where necessary, restraints„ denying access to the aircraft operating areas should be installed. 2. Southwest Corner In the vicinity of the Fancher Flyways lease, the future installation of the fuel storage tanks has been included on the master plan. The parking areas which have been fenced are excellent. 3., Apron "B" Area (Adjacent to Taxiways "B" and "C" on West Side) No significant modifications for this area have been included in the plan. 4. Apron "C" Area (Adjacent to Taxiway "H" on West Side) The possible use of the apron area for general aviation aircraft open stor- age -- even on a short-term basis _- is welcome. No modifications to' this area are included in the master plan; however, should this area revert to the city in the future and the installation of T-hangars be desirable, a sketch has been included on the following page showing how this area could be developed. 5. Robertson Aircraft Area (Between Taxiways "H" and ."J" on West Side) The only modification to this area is the removal of the auto parking from ' the aircraft apron. It is recognized that space is at a premium, but every effort must be made to keep auto parking within the confines of the indicated areas. 6. Renton Aviation Area (Northwest Corner) Several modifications have been made to the master plan for this area.. 99 • FIGURE VIII-3 •APRON C • ALTERNATE USAGE WITH GENERAL AVIATION T-HANGARS _- __.-----— _-------- , RAINIER --- r:p%!-%NiNgq.0410 AgMAKAN E SERVICE 1 pORT --- •,‘.....---.7,777,77 7::Wi. 7:747- . .:1:4 4.ii:P ...............,............ . ...................,..............„... .................. ,.......,.......,....,..... """.........". AIRCRAFT APRON --<-1: .]:.% '.i]:',::i: i:•-li>: ::i:i- Z :,;..ii:.:: .'i:iili::: 'i%ia •:i:i::*..??..i.! ':ii:I:i:M ';:::"Mi.';:%; .:;:i:iiW -';!*:.Mi;' :i:N::i]. o. .i-i:'..i: ,:i:M. .g:'. :Ai:i; - :.:ii-p.: :::.i,:,- i::..ii:i .gim Fii:iiig: ftn,/ .Kg:i?:i 'iiiiii•-ii.i,i.' 41:1ii:ii: 1 ..:1.... :::...i.,:.. .ii:iii..: ,.:.,:;:i-. _i .:m.:i .i:::i::i?, :•?.:!:Ei::i :::im: i§i:iai: ii:iii:iiiE::i. Z:gii:ii: *n.,,ZiN, i§:::.3:0.m ---,—BRL ::,.......:.... 56\......4 56,1..._ t =I 7c I ,:::.::..• A:i-* ,:::..i. :-- TAXIWAY- 56 i--..-1 561k- STANDARD SINGLE ENGINE a LIGHT TWIN HANGAR PLEASE LINE I. .,,.,............: .4 0 . 0_ • . . • 4. ) r ,..D First, . the auto parking has been confined to the space behind the general office and hangar building (Building X-31 ) . The eventual removal of the hangar (Building X-4) is recommended and this area incorporated into the auto parking spaces. The present installation of the auto parking area along the fence has been included in the master plan. T-hangars capable of accommodating medium size general aviation aircraft have been shown. These hangars are 35 feet by 259 feet for the eight unit hangars (41 foot wide door openings) , 35 feet by 197 feet for the six unit hangars, and 35 feet by 135 feet for the four unit hangars. In the curved area behind the four unit hangar, the space has been indicated for auto parking for aircraft owners, and a section has been reserved for a future control tower site. The fencing has been extended, including the section located alongside the new restaurant lease. • 7. Restaurant Lease Area No detailed design has been shown on the master plan for the restaurant lease area. The building, however, must be located so that it does not violate the restriction lines, nor penetrate the 7: 1 transition slopes established for the runway, or the 34: 1 approach slope established for the waterlane. On the side facing the lake, access must be provided for aircraft to pass between the airport and the seaplane ramp. 8. Seaplane Base Seaplane facilities should be limited to constructing two new seaplane ramps and a floating dock on existing airport property. The Airport Layout Plan indicates these changes. 9. Northeast Corner This narrow, wedge shaped part of the airport is restricted for use by 101 navigational aids only. The MLS glide slope facility, the VASI equipment, the rotating beam ceilometer, the fire training area, and the FAA trans- ceiver facility are the only permitted uses. No structures, aircraft or auto parking is permitted in this area. In addition, the two small build- ings located on city property across the river near the Boeing Bridge must be removed at the time the MLS glide slope facility is installed. These two buildings would constitute an obstruction to the glide slope beam. 10. Eastside General Aviation Area The present redevelopment of the T-hangar area has been indicated on the master plan. In addition, the removal of the old hangars X-14 and X-15 is indicated, and this area converted into a paved, open tie-down area for aircraft. The limited access road terminates at the tie-down area and access beyond this point should be strictly limited. An auto parking area has been provided outside the fence for aircraft owners. The airport maintenance center has been relocated to the area between the road and the river, north of the new T-hangar area. A maintenance/repair/ storage building designed for airport equipment can be built here, as well as having an outside storage yard for vehicles and spare parts. The exist- ing city storage buildings, X-18 and X-24, should be removed. 11 . Boeing Lease Area "A" No changes are indicated on this part of the facility. The previous comment regarding auto access to the aircraft operating areas should be implemented as soon as a satisfactory scheme can be worked out for control of these vehicles. Within the Boeing Lease Area "A" are several blast fences used when aircraft engines are tested. The use and location of these blast fences is not questioned, however, it is suggested that Boeing investigate the costs and feasibility of installing an auxiliary fence, or perhaps some modification 102 to these existing fences, so that noise generated by the engine testing can be further deflected, absorbed, or reduced in some manner. Fuel Storage Facilities Four aircraft fuel storage facilities have been shown on the master plan. 'The major one is the Boeing fuel farm located in the southeast corner of the airport. This facility utilizes underground tanks, and above ground truck service equip- ment. No change is indicated for this facility. The second is adjacent to Aero-Dyne's building 5-01 , beneath their identity sign. This area is scheduled for enlargement as the present fuel island is phased out. Appropriate safeguards and fencing should be provided. The third is adjacent to Francher Airways building in the southwest corner. This will be a new facility, replacing the present tanks. It will have under- ground tanks, and again, appropriate safeguards and fencing should be provided. The fourth is in the Renton Aviation tie-down area. Presently this underground tank serves the fuel island on the apron. This fuel island is planned for removal , and all refuelling will. be by truck. The enlargement of the fuel tanks has been planned, and the facility will be located between T-hangars that will be constructed in the future. Control Tower Sites The old control tower, built in 1950, and located on building 5-02, was retired from FAA when the new tower was inaugurated in 1961 . However, Boeing 'uses the tower to maintain visual contact and radio communications with all their flights. The new tower, five stories high, is the present scene of the FAA air traffic control center for Renton. The tower controls all surface and airborne traffic for Renton Municipal , but not for the seaplane activity in the lake. Visibility from the tower is excellent for the runway and its approaches, but is somewhat 103 ' ' I limited when aircraft are flying to the west of the field. The visibility; (line-of-sight) is also limited when aircraft are taxiing in the southeast' corner of the airport, and when they are behind hangars in the northwest corner of the field. The visibility into the seaplane operating area is also limited. The recommended seaplane operating area has been located in such a manner that it can be seen from the control tower, thus permitting the tower personnel; to exercise supervision over seaplane takeoffs and landings. Seaplane Landing Area It is recommended that a directive be issued by the City of Renton authorizing seaplane operations only in a restricted area located as follows: parallel to and about 400 feet west of the runway center line, with the south threshold of the seaplane landing area approximately 1 ,500 feet north of the shoreline. This will allow better separation between land plane and seaplane operations and provide substantial reduction in seaplane noise. In practice, seaplanes currently land and depart nearly parallel to the shoreline several hundred feet from the shore. FUTURE CONSIDERATIONS There are a couple of items on which no hard and fast decisions can be made in this, master plan. One is the purchase of land in the south clear zone. Waiv- ers have been granted for the few obstructions that penetrate the clear zone surface (see Approach and Clear Zone Plan, Figure VIII-2) . These obstructions could -- in the future -- restrict the operation of certain types of aircraft. Instrument landing minimums could be affected if the regulations are changed at some date. The removal of certain obstructions, such as trees and towers to the south of the airport„ might permit lower minimums if an evaluation' of future. criteria indicates this to be possible. In anticipation that future conditions would be enhanced if these obstructions were lowered or removed, consideration should be given to purchasing property having obstructions in the south clear zone if, and when, such property comes on the open market. A schedule for removal of obstructions and a reserve fund to accomplish this is discussed in the next chapter. io4 Second, it has been suggested that the west parallel taxiway (Taxiway "A")" could be relocated closer to the runway in accordance with the "non-precision runway" criteria given in the Advisory Circular 150/5300-6 covering design; standards for this type of airport. (See Modified Airport Layout Plan - Po:tential Ultimate Configuration, Figure VIII-4..) The purpose of such a change would be to release more aircraft area on the west side of the airport. However, due to FAR Part 77 restrictions, Boeing aircraft of the 727 and 707 size could not be parked closer to the runway than the existing aircraft park- ing restriction line allows. Because Boeing aprons currently run most of the length of the taxiway, an estimated 83 spaces could be gained for parking , general aviation aircraft. The decision to relocate the taxiway should await two events: 1 . The benefits gained by relocating the taxiway and lighting•: system are' greater than the costs. To meet this criteria, the taxiway relocation would probably not be considered unless substantial reconstruction of' the existing taxiway is needed due to structural failure or the manufacture of substantially heavier aircraft by Boeing. Partial reconstruction or overlay of Taxiway-"A`': is expected to be required within five years. 2. The demonstrated ability of the microwave landing system to function with- out problems should aircraft and/or structures be permitted to operate or be closer to the runway environment than is now allowed. LAND USES The airport site is used primarily by 1) Boeing, 2) fixed base operators ,and other general aviation-related businesses, and 3). aircraft owners; it supports normal aircraft activity associated with general aviation _ interests. The airport is used by Boeing for post-assembly aircraft check-out and preparation for the first flight. General aviation uses include aircraft tie-down, hangar- ing, fueling, maintenance and modification, painting, instruction, and air taxi 105 o IA p GATE I. m FUEL STORAGE SITE • i. ME ELECTRIC SUB-STATION DESIGNATED AUTO PARKING AND DRIVE AREAS T' $ N. AIRCRAFT PARKING AND MANEUVERING AREA! �,- Q BUILDINGS TD BE REMOVED IN FUTURE I ^ rf 370 A•'•.7 x iQ.... ADDITIONAL GENERAL AVIATION PARKING AR EA t xi63 0 1 00 C ii ■iofL i /`1AL 1 't lair ';"ir p% \ op Boo 0----%A.,Sii talirVirras "1414_141W4eriWrig .- 4;.0er--4 1 1P4 1 At ' ./ Ito. a- _ :. , L. o'= of �y Y 'I''F 1 G��1J''! • E A � _ f�J Bx o I 4 1 N +^, I V E 0 p Fa" IpT of :[: .� r 1 ' / 3a0 I r X 330 X - • c C 121 i 14�i 7 Oil 1z 1 rcl....i,;.s.. . yP A V E • = I . !til m1 yi ' •RESTAURANT ' • W. ..: -..:.�. _..:..."..:"..:: ..:.✓....;.; :�:;...���: yl p i'l s1 h SITE SEAPLANE G, _Gf..... ! { I I 1 al I 1, / N RAMP 20 O a N MOVEASTRUCBLE • �`I•• INI I`s`I—�'1----1 ill--'i1 _�FLOATING DOCK x2e.o I ,`•I vz a.o - " —SEAPLANE X/ A RING AIRPORT SERVICE-' —r— I� P :: s�l RAMP ROAD I : 1 _` ..` at'ws i•, ' 1�.•,• NE . OR X �r APR ::. I'�_I :S.EA;cLAR • _ SEAPLANE ACCESS CI ` I t r ',., '' - ;�,gym, x. RAMP 'MIMEN �r 0 •� _ IFRUG� p �C � •„ OBSTRO TION � I . _ vl9s Et LIGHTS 1 '�f105vL6CF�D; I E - ®dial >W A G TON : likl 0. . T P7, __ w_ .:•, :.'a .:••' Vo �' o-ry -1• la� ; Q y _ , g /oED MLS ANTEN, -' RAGp ,;: I MLS o' .' AFT BRIDGE I I SIro• • w FOR BOEING USE • ` t N x2... gg p� O 1 I KUR H-^of `. 9� I BUILDING TO BE L7 PR ZONE > ' - - ! _ I° xl9• REMOVED linMLS x19,0 o ':I CLEARANCE •IRPOR7 W 2. _ AREA ACCESS TO 1 6- ��.>BRL' y ,o BRL B —� ..•2.;.�.:�.�.:;,' i0� I LOG II BOOMS T--- ' .:3 MOVEABLE _KS6D - . STRUCTURES ,,! n rp Lx'' 100.0 1.!111:11 x :: .. PAVED i 6UOtA1 %` .. Xlzo I,OG290i ®1 x::i > i ':'i'i'ii:g:':.:' 50• �" / SUBMITTED BY: x- !.®1 �" ✓ { f waM4pton ENGINEERS PLANNERS �" K , 1 APPROVAL BLOCK 1 I:® ��•./5.0 . : _ zs �TURING 3 x29.0 :..' — LOGAN AVE.ACCESS-- • " TO AIRPORT ; — } �. 4 x2a.o 25 5 II • ::.ryh x290 , / _ / LOGAN O. REVISIONS BY APP. DATE / ' 4yE — RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT • WILL ROGERS—WILEY POST MEMORIAL SEAPLANE 'pL BASE T RENTON, WASHINGTON MODIFIED AIRPORT LAYOUT PLAN TERVAL: POTENTIAL ULTIMATE CONFIGURATION I SYSTEM: ytTY 1-washIngton D , "I ENGINEERS PLANNERS I DESIGNED BY: II:Crane E S.Allison TRACED BY: I.garela A p.neale p • IEA LEVEL BASED DRAWN BY: I. arela 'S Oq p.neale CHECKED BY:S. Allison pm {.G,S. B,M, i SHEET OF SHEETS SCALE AS SHOWN ' FIGURE VIII-4 i I service. Situated on the northern part of the airport on the shore of Lake Washington is a seaplane base used by craft landing on the lake. Major function- al land uses are illustrated in the Airport Land Use Plan, Figure VIII-5. Land uses surrounding the airport are identified, in the Renton Comprehensive Land Use Plan. The Boeing operation to the east is a heavy industrial land use. South of the site is light industrial area. The Renton junior and senior high schools are located about 1 ,000 feet south of the southern boundary of the airport. Commercial and medium density multi-family land uses are located southeasterly and east of the airport. Farther east are residential uses. ' To the north is Lake Washington. Figure VIII-6 indicates land uses in the airport area. Changing technology, airport design standards, and operating conditions cannot all be anticipated in the master planning process. Every attempt has been made in this study to incorporate the latest advanced thinking into the fore- casts and design features of this facility; however, events do occur which cannot be forecast. It is recommended that this master plan be updated as often as necessary to take advantage of all advances that will occur in the years to come. 107 1 • I O O O • A . m 0 tit ^h 0,370 • c'iltWire ifial ,r63.0 a ■ ■71.0 .r 'P l o `‘-• OWN- _-.",ral 000..0112r,40114,111iiir' s' ,,,,,,e j$ lis;--) 4Po/ • ...0 0 o t�_►�i l AI tjl .� _14:_' ...•.. _ �„ . oar ��'I��« i ill `•�yar,1 ._!-, J( X i/ 9 F PARK (, O O „1/�, ':. 5��� I 'E H o ,E�. L i ... / MOBIL �Q pini um1 �I Im :;:.;.: r Xii.o A.390 ram rd i h.--- -- , / -• {{yl F Icl f I � z //' ,� �j izll fx t :., 111 '� 1 V� �_ his_ G. =1=I 1x1 zl Ic�i fl"I It ' /,' �r ::• ::''>ta, ICI III I�� ICI I?I t:..i I I G�O'�—�'; +� 1 I I. { I'I I A -i r ' SEAPLANE RAMP F il� O O �'� MOVEABLE • J �.. - G FLOATING DOCK ' STRUCTURE ' LgR{ II ; 28.0 gp x IEf� r2 0.0 X2 • •.r ! X-/65.001 AIRPORT SERVICE BRL x y w r.>' ,� 1�� SEAPLANE PARKING ROAD d- ' � , f RAMP f`��1!. p �OOr'R SEAPLANE •�1 I A�RL'v /`I . . . . c IOO��II RAMP X2' \pZQ ,,, .� SEAPLANE ACCESS RAMP I REIL o 'I 1 G0R • :. - ---�I LAKE OBSTRU TIO�S�/110. ,•J'©i,t... — .. .rav -. - 1 o - IRILIGHTS.. ❑ I.•I �4 ; ,�I _- — 1 •Q !• •..� 11 - 17f • S N/N G TON e.5 NOTE...\\\WWW000 G (w]_ 1 < S� y , • iO - IS� E��Wf�NnEE • REIL �� !+�l,� el. ANTENNAS VAST o =P~I ree.iq.s 1 MLS '4'"..°o w _�"' • 19.3 �• SI 'sue r " AIRCRAFT BRIDGE • O I I ro N 24.. FOR BOEING USE 34:1 ��'. o� .tilt , i. BUILDING TO BE • CLEAR= n .\. PRL \ y' J I rrg. REMOVED ZONE \ L' MLS rr9.0 ____° o AIRPORT - -'r ]i�� CLEARANCE ° _ ACCESS TO - r29.0 • AREA �,�� 2 MOVEABLE Loa�• �I BOOMS X55.0 �,�'�.(!. {�STRRwUCTURES ��.1 �� ...:...:...:.. y , X :..':r:: . ,, ', P A V E 0 0006 :ci%^ rrzo • 50.' ,-ROPERT r2• SUBMITTED BY: X, ' Iwashinglon ENGINEERS PLANNERS I' t 55.0 3 APPROVAL BLOCK • I. 25 URING ' LOGAN AVE.ACCES •• - / "']]]II I . J ,29.0 .. 41 i AV 1 1 S TO AIRPORT �] I '.. r14.0 • �3� '• X29.0 dilik / ryh. LOG4N 4y e. f �0. REVISIONS BY APP. DATE / I RENtON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT i • WILL ROGERS-WILEY POST MEMORIAL SEAPLANE • BASE ' ' RENTON,WASHINGTON IBVALi • AIRPORT LAND USE PLAN - • • ISTEM,' V weshinglon ! , ' Y' I Y ENGINEERS PLANNERS O I DESIGNED BY: R.tr°Ile d S.Allison TRACED,BY: I.g°rcic 8 p.neole A LEVEL BASED i p �S. B.M DRAWN BY: I.garcia p.neale CHECKED BY:S. Allison Z.3 SHEET OF SHEETS SCALE AS SHOWN • FIGURE VIII-5 1 I FIGURE VIII-6 AIRPORT VICINITY LAND USE PLAN I LAKE ::•••.• ■ =k II WASHINGTON i • / : ;',, ,A ) .,,, ... cLi - 1 iLt. °,3 '. ,:'..,,, ,, ' •• > • O I_ III' '< • = s 5 r ix, • LEGEND . 12' =Single-Family Res. :• 2 , � Multi-Family Res. s I .:. ,.'• �.._ . .. .(•Airport Wa � / ` Commercial y ;i •: ? / .I. r.w••••• '�,,, `y?a • 0y• MEIndustrial �'3rdd.Ave• ! Transportation .Q$Q� ••.• = Public f., IINIIII�I I1I :: : Recreation 109 11 !' costs' • • ono fincncing •.:. • -• •••• • , • .s..4 7 11 I i ` I The airport development program described in Chapter Vlff is shown to be economically feasible when reasonable projections of airport revenues and expenses are- c.ons tiered. Capital investment costs were computed in terms of 1976 dollars for each item of construction based upon the latest available unit costs in the Renton area. The existing financial status of thelairport was determined through interviews with representatives of the City and through a thorough review of airport financial statements, lease agreements and cost data obtained from the City. Actual expenses and revenues identified through this review process served as a base for future projections and as a standard for an appraisal of the reasonableness of the projections. Projected operat- ing revenues and expenditures were estimated through 1995 based upon existing facilities and additional recommened facilities and also took into considera- tion increases resulting from inflationary trends. The feasibility :of the development program is determined by the ability of the expanded faciliity to 111 IJ generate the revenue required to cover the annual administrative, operating, maintenance and debt service costs, while maintaining reasonable and competi- tive fees and charges. A detailed discussion of the assumptions, findings and conclusions is presented in the following paragraphs. DEVELOPMENT COST ESTIMATES AND SCHEDULE An estimate of development costs of the proposed airport development is shown in Table IX-1 . The costs shown were developed for general planning purposes based upon average unit costs experienced on similar projects. Prior to commitment of airport resources, detailed engineering cost estimates should be prepared. Costs are shown in 1976 dollars and include construction, engineer- ing, administration and an allowance for contingencies. The location of the major development items are indicated in Figure IX-1 . • The majority of the development cost (roughly 77) per-cent is attributable to three items: taxiway overlay 0$337,000) , T-hangar construction ($327,700) , and the installation of the Microwave-Landing System ($250,000) . Most of the. develop- ment items will occur in the short-range (1977 to 1982) time frame. Taxiway "A" Costs are shown in Table IX-1 for a complete overlay of Taxiway "A" during the 1983-1988 time period. If it is determined at that time that the taxiway should be relocated closer to the runway, it would cost an estimated $1 ,025,000 (in 1976 dollars) , or an additional $688,000. Obstruction Removal Obstructions to the approach surfaces as defined in Federal Aviation Regulation Part 77 are shown in the Approach and Clear Zone Plan. The obstructions fall into four categories: 1 . Buildings. 2. Transmission lines, 3. Trees and antennas. 4. Miscellaneous objects on or near airport property, 112 TABLE IX-1 DEVELOPMENT COST ESTIMATES AND SCHEDULE - ESTIMATED COST (1976 DOLLARS) PERIOD IMPROVEMENT SCHEDULED DEVELOPMENT ITEM Total City Federal Private 1977-1982 1983-1988 A. TAXIWAYS AND APRONS 1) Relocate and widen Taxiway $ 37,600 $ 9,400 $ 28,200 $ - X "G"; remove portions of 600 150 450 - X existing taxiway (approx. 20' x 80' ) 2) Widen Taxiway "F" (additional 7,000 1 ,750 5,250 - X 15' x 200' ) 3) Reconstruct portion of Taxiway 27,000 6,750 20,250 - X "A" 4) Complete overlay of Taxiway 337,000 84,250 252,750 - X • 5) Pave new aircraft parking 14,000 3,500 10,500 - X areas adjacent to runway 33 threshold 6) Pave new aircraft parking 45,500 11 ,380 34, 120 - X area on east side of runway 7) Construct Taxiways "M" & "N" 75,000 18,750 56,250 - X Subtotal 543,700_ 135,930 407,770 - • B. SEAPLANE FACILITIES 1 ) Construct seaplane ramp 25,000 6,250 18,750 - X 2) Construct floating dock 13,000 3,250 9,750 - X 3) Construct access road between 3,000 750 2,250 - - X restaurant and shoreline - - ;; If Taxiway "A" was relocated, it would cost an estimated $1 ,025,000, including relocations of `^' lighting and runway markings. • - - TABLE IX-1 (CONT.) ESTIMATED- COST (1976- DOLLARS) - PERIOD IMPROVEMENT SCHEDULED DEVELOPMENT ITEM . - - Total City - Federal Private 1977-1982 1983-1988 4) Engineers, surveying, inspec- $ 12,000 $ 3,000 $ 9,000 $ - - X ion and testing. 53,000 13,250 39,750 C. ROADWAYS, PARKING, FENCING 1) Construct auto parking lot 3,800 950 2,850 - X on eastside of runway by compass rose 2) Install security gates on 600 150 450 - X south side of Taxiway "L" 3) Complete perimeter fencing 4,000 1 ,000 3,000 - X around restaurant site 4) Parking lot fencing in Renton 6, 100 1 ,530 4,570 - X aviation area Sub-Total 14,500 3,630 10,870 - D. HANGARS, BUILDINGS 1 ) Construct 7 T-hangar build- 327,700 - - 327,700 X ings - 2 each - 35'x135' -4 units 4 each - 35'x260'-8 units 1 each -. 35'x200' -6 units 2) Construct airport maintenance 61 ,750 15,440 46,310 - X . and storage facility (5,225 sq.ft. ) Remove maintenance 500 130 370 - X hangar (X-18) and storage building (X-24) _ 3) Demolish and remove "Faucher 1 ,500 380 1 ,120 - - X Flyways" hangar 4) Remove Dominion Hangar X-10 - - - - X (removal cost=salvage value) TABLE IX-1 (CONT.) ESTii4ATED COST (1976 DOLLARS) PERIOD IMPROVEMENT SCHEDULED DEVELOPMENT ITEM Total City Federal Private 1977-1982 1983-1988 5) Buildings removed by FBO's at $ - $ - $ - $ _ X their expense: X- 16 - Airport Specialties X-30 - Aero Dyne X-4 - Renton Aviation X-8 - Renton Aviation Sub-Total 391 ,450 15,950 47,800 327,700 E. LANDING AIDS 1) Relocate and provide addition- 6,500 1 ,630 4,870 - X al medium intensity taxiway lights (MITL) 2) Install HIRL in Runway 15/33* 10,200 2,550 7,650 - • X 3) Mark Runway 15/33 for "all 3,000 750 2,250 - X weather" use- 4) Microwave Landing System with 250,000 - 250,000 - X distance measuring equipment - MLS/DME Sub-Total 269,700 4,930 264,770 - F. OTHER 1 ) Flood protection -- improve- 8,600 8,600 - - X ment of dike along Cedar River (900 ft. ) 2) Utilities -- install utilities 26,000 6,500 19,500 - X to restaurant lease site Sub-Total 34,600 15, 100 19,500 - Sub-Total (Per Category) $1 ,306,950 $188,790 $790,460 $327,700 ul * Items are contingent upon the feasibility of an MLS system at Renton Municipal Airport meet1n9 future FAA criteria. a y 5 TABLE IX-1 (CONT.) ESTIMATED COST (1976 DOLLARS) ?E IOD IMPROVEMENT SCHEDULED DEVELOPMENT ITEM Total City Federal ' Private 1977.1982 198 ,-i9$8 Sub-Total (Per Category) $1 ,306,950 $188,790 $790,460 $327,700 Contingencies (l0%) 130,695 18,879 79,046 32,770 Sales Tax on Materials 35,287 5,097 21 ,342 8,848 (50% of sub-total @ 5.4%) Sub-Total 1 ,472,932 212,766 890,848 369,318 Engineering & Administrative (10%) 147,294 21 ,277 89,085 36,932 TOTAL $1 ,620,226 $234,043 $979,933 $406,250 0" F I ., • o o • RAINIER �t00 AIRPORT TO• E. OPT ir 111161. !•F 14,4 1 ro° �� `i. .•w�� �,_._lt' .4 tea■. ff t(, )4116r�'I�1././` % i i C� Tit �► ■�}+... ,,,,, 1ratati a'■. Q t �\'�i,_ 1 .\,J4l _lic—R� ��� �11 To \ �C.a.�a„1 ti p' !f�s� `� 1�,.VHF_ �.■ ■ ■ �11 t—�pl �R o ° 1-y mil( l�;i v./ ■r�� f E [ •►r u4 �F *� • F., + `zs �.� r�� rry v �1e o iz �4 ■ ..b . . �6:N .l 1 '_ 1 Do /IEf o VA .1*:'r ,- 41".- ---_,,,k - --/3b''. --'7L -"jr•RVI \. /.A.-. Aga _��.�.�'�15.7�—'�_ � ��^:•..I ~.! [-I �nE PPP .no � Mfillgi!igl AI:� ' �E _ .� - —�_-'^••EYE.'-�..ERk� ,, P _ i � gcfL� . i- f �© 6 -,41, I� MJ I ors ��ti��( r•0-,f 0 l�`,y��—�—( _a•a-•-=E. . O^— —°. -�. �! -III. a nuros ° .a 4 'YE :E a tt -AA�fi gr7. '� �M 1 1E l '. • STPUCNRE CONTROL TOWER WITH •+oe + v • + . t 1 1 1'. I 1 jai ,; r 1 I. 4 1 QO 110 lMR Id1 l cm ,•� RPORT 0EPCOH L BAL ,yy � ■■■�j///I���'���, IIIR .{� RAL iPRL .tTooflt—+t+,r F r.` aPRL �E 'r — m — m Ty YRVR • s 1�0r / � , t 0 TI%IWLY TO BE CLOSED 11 • 100��Mir r �� - I ' `llgolgir'« . coy ; . � {� �■ E o 0 �f��� 'Y0I" ••033Y8'NUN AY w17H ud DI9IS�C■D TN-rF_AY�SDi7N• NOS• SSE 56"W (TRUE) ,,,' 11 L. �\ __ +da3 Nile.NTUR[1 —�N �„...RTA s giliALIMMEIMIT �.E lip/ . . . :4"'"rPm.4,_.,1k ' ,k,,...Atik GM- , •• �1 � IIw9 / --�w o �� o ��` cfa°ufrEn _ _ _I 71 0111111 Viir AprIL • • o N yi R % '+th 0 �IMREp PCCE99 R E �• _ ... � �Y la 'E�P.r•�•'T— DPNDMS• SERVICE ft ............... � + '����" p a vE0 f g /� //////��` BEYOND MS POIN FOR x 1 Fq'/ • % POP�ORT SERVICE x. Y 6a0 +so ^!J! "/ • • PW CRAFT BRIDGE t • m AIRPORT --- 41/ FOR BOEING USE ++.f p 4 •PERT 11 � ...- AIRCRAFT RCRnfr PARKING .a - RIHG +ao •fioo • z re 1 + { PAR 'n° BOEING MANUFACTURING rn f �j]]]��ff ( x m g _,r� f � I;;(" I D_� —:E N�E�0 1� Q � FACILITY App4 j� .v a +�1 fi I ��' 2 z m E.LDG 1 1 ( `•., „Y. rriCam T X N I 7 p m Li' ml o z -n m a (A XI 0 0 Although all existing approach obstructions have been waived by the FAA (letter dated March 7, 1973 to Del Bennett, Airport Manager) , it would be desirable to eliminate obstructions where feasible. Buildings constituting obstructions are the Renton High School and a house and apartment building on Tobin Avenue. The stack on the school penetrates the transitional surface approximately 30 feet. The school building itself penetrates approximately 40 feet in places. It is estimated that removal and replacement of the school would cost over $11 million. Because of the enormous cost, it is recommended that the school building remain until 'its useful life has ended. The house and apartment building penetrate the surface approximately 12 feet and 18 feet respectively. Although these structures do not represent ' . a safety hazard now, they should be considered for purchase and removal when they become available for sale. A set of three transmission lines runs across the approach surface about 4,000 feet from the south end of the runway. They were relocated from a position closer to the runway to their present position in about 1940. At that time clearance was granted from the FAA for the new location and height. The ,cost to move them underground or relocate them is estimated at about $600,000 per mile for each line. Because their penetration of the approach surface is, minimal , it is recommended they be left in their present position indefinitely. Numerous trees penetrate the approach surface. Trees should be trimmed or removed now and new growth should be trimmed as it penetrates the approach surface as an ongoing city function. Better enforcement of Renton height restriction codes is needed to control the installation of private tele vision antennas that violate the approach surface. 118 The blast fence at the south end of the airport penetrates the approach surface approximately 40 feet. However, it is a necessity for the departure of the large commercial aircraft and must remain as a variance. A reserve fund is included in the financial plan for funding future obstruc- tion removal . Obstruction lighting can also be provided through this fund, for marking obstructions. All transmission lines, buildings, and other objects penetrating the approach surface should be lighted (except if specifically' waived by the FAA) . Obstruction removal should be accomplished according to the following plan, and schedule: Scheduled. Date Item and Number(s)* Removal Plan of Removal Fence (1 ) Fence should remain since it is ad- To remain ,'„ jacent to and lower than the blast indefinitely. shield. Blast Shield (2) Blast shield is lighted and is a To remain; necessity for the departure of indefinitely. Boeing aircraft. Road (3) Road should remain at its present To remain grade level since vehicle clearance indefinitely. remains below blast shield . Apartment Building Purchase property if it is voluntar- December 31 , 1985 (4) ily offered for sale. After Decem- ber 31 , 1982 condemn property if necessary. Lower roof or demolish building and resell lot. House (5) Purchase property if it is voluntar- December ,31 , 1982 ily offered for sale. After Decem- ber 31 , 1979 condemn property if necessary. Lower roof or demolish building. 119 Scheduled Date Item and Number(s)* Removal Plan of Removal Trees (6,7,9) City to trim all trees in violation of June 30, 1978 approach surface. Trees should be trimmed five feet below approach sur- face to allow for future growth. An- nually, inspect approach area for tree growth above approach surface. High School (8) Study the operational and environmental Beyond 1995 effects of lowering the stack by approx- imately 25 feet, to the maximum height of the building itself. The school building is to remain until its useful life has ended . Transmission Towers Transmission towers have been cleared To remain (10) without obstruction lights by FAA indefinitely. Aeronautical Study 70-FEA-176-08, effective 3/17/71 . Antennas Annually inspect approach area for None currently new antennas which penetrate identified. approach surface. * Reference the Approach and Clear Zone Plan. The City of Renton currently has an ordinance restricting the height of new structures under the approach surfaces. This ordinance should be strictly enforced and reviewed periodically by the city. PROJECTIONS OF REVENUES AND EXPENSES Historical operating revenues and expenditures from 1963 through 1975 are shown in Table IX-2. Operating revenues consist of three categories : build- ing and land rentals, fuel and oil charges and miscellaneous and reimbursable services. Total operating revenue has more than doubled in the last 12 years , increasing from $49,000 to almost $120,000. The majority of increase is due to building and land rental revenues. Although the total leased area has increased slightly from 1963, the increase in rental, revenue is primarily due to rising rental rates, the most recent of which is an increase in the Boeing rental from $3,293 per month in the beginning of 1975 to S9,252 per 120 r TABLE IX-2 PROJECTIONS OF OPERATING REVENUES AND EXPENSES OPERATING REVENUES OPERATING EXPENSES BUILDING FUEL AND MISC. AND TOTAL SALARIES MATERIALS TOTAL NET CALENDAR AND LAND OIL REIMBURSED OPERATING WAGES & SUPPLIES & OPERATING OPERATING YEAR RENTAL CHARGES SERVICES REVENUE BENEFITS SERVICES EXPENSES TOTAL HISTORICAL 1963 $ 46,920.38 $ - $2,316.51 $ 49,236.89 $ 20,947.42 $10,836.86 $ 31,784.28 $ 17,452.61 1964 47,520.09 - 1,553.42 49,073.51 21,138.09 10,227.81 31,365.90 17,707.61 1965 n.a. n.a. n.a. 57,159.78 n.a. n.a. 31,512.45 25,647.33 1966 56,501.11 4,730.16 1,503.27 62,734.54 16,437.10 9,669.74 26,106.84 36,627.70 1967 61,273.71 5,445.49 1,401.24 68,120.44 17,650.43 11,313.82 28,964.25 39,156.19 1968 75,329.01 6,313.90 1,718.60 83,361.51 18,742.32 10,385.69 29,128.01 54,233.50 1969 72,846.94 6,237.54 1,374.92 80,459.40 21,304.00 11,795.38 33,099.38 47,360.02 1970 87,141.80 5,612.15 1,368.72 94,122.67 23,251.28 10,100.29 33,351.57 60,771.10 1971 97,945.66 4,791.83 - 102,737.49 24,099.58 23,432.50 47,532.08 55,205.41 1972 92,214.30 3,751.39 - 95,965.69 13,101.90 32,205.32 45,307.22 50,658.47 1973 95,523.58 5,027.16 - , 100,550.74 25,424.03 26,435.35 51,859.38 48,691.36 1974 103,326.71 6,903.66 - 110,230.37 35,515.93 26,031.74 61,547.67 48,682.70 1975 146,246.73* 5,787.64 - 152,033.97* 41,512.03 32,668.87 74,180.90 77,853.07* PROJECTIONS (In Current Year Dollars) 1977 198,000 6,400 204,400 50,200 37,400 87,600 116,800 1978 200,000 6,900 206,900 55,300 40,000 95,300 111,600 1979 205,000 7,400 212,400 60,800 42,800 103,600 108,800 1980 230,000 - 7,800 237,800 66,900 45,800 112,700 125,100 1981 254,000 8,000 262,000 82,900 48,100 131,000 131,000 1982 259,000 8,200 267,200 87,800 50,500 138,300 128,900 1983 265,000 8,400 273,400 93,100 53,000 146,100 127,300 1984 271,000 8,600 279,600 98,700 55,700 154,400 125,200 1985 298,000 8,800 306,800 104,600 58,500 163,100 143,700 1986 325,000 9,000 334,000 110,900 60,800 171,700 162,300 1987 332,000 9,200 341,200 117,500 63,300 180,800 160,400 1988 339,000 9,400 348,400 124,600 65,800 190,400 158,000 1989 346,000 9,600 355,600 132,100 68,400 200,500 155,100 1990 375,000 9,800 384,800 140,000 71,100 211,100 173,700 1991 404,000 9,800 413,800 148,400 74,000 222,400 191,400 1992 413,000 9,800 422,800 157,300 77,000 234,300 188,500 _ 1993 422,000 9,800 431,800 166,700 80,000 246,700 185,100 N 1994 431,000 9,800 440,800 176,700 83,200 259,900 180,900 1995 467,000 9,800 476,800 187,400 86,600 274,000 202,800 * Includes income for the 1975 rental period received in 1976. month, effective June 1 , 1975. The current rental rate of airport tie-down area is seven cents per square foot for property leased by Boeing and eight cents per square foot for all other leased land. The airport also collects two cents per gallon on all fuel and oil sales on the airport. Airport operating expenses have been catagorized according to a) salary, wages and benefits and b) materials, supplies and services. Salary expenses have fluctuated in the past, because of the changes in numbers of airport employees and the percentage of their salaries allocated to the airport. Current airport employment consists of one maintenance man, one airport director and one administrative secretary. These services are currently charged at the rate of 100 percent for the maintenance man, 75 percent for the airport director and 50 percent for the secretary. Costs of materials, supplies and services have increased rapidly in recent years due to the allo- cation of certain city functions to the airport' s budget. A portion of the city's legislative services, city executive services, the clerk, city treasurer, police protection, and fire protection are now charged to the airport, although they are performed by other city departments. This is a normal practice and reflects the support given to the airport by these other departments. Revenue Projections Building and land revenues are projected to increase at the rate of six per- cent per year to 1980, five percent a year to 1985 and four percent per year beyond 1985. Boeing rental rates are reviewed every five years beginning with the next increase in 1980, thus accounting for the jumps in rental revenue projections in five-year increments. These incremental increases are VTN estimates and do not reflect contractual obligations nor are they intended to serve as standards. Non-Boeing rentals are projected to increase in the late 1970s and early 1980s due to added tie-down area and T-hangars in the seaplane and adjacent area. All T-hangars are assumed to be built by the lessee. It is recommended that lease rates for all airport property 122 continue to parallel current market rates for comparable property elsewhere. and the projected increases in rental revenues are based upon this assumption. Fuel and oil charges are projected to remain at the current rate of two cents a gallon throughout the forecast period. In 1975 an average of 2.45 gallons of fuel was sold on the airport for each aircraft operation. Future airport fuel revenues are based on this average continuing. With operations expected to level-off at 200,000 in 1990, fuel revenues are expected to show a corresponding leveling. The net result of the individual operating revenue projections is an overall increase in operating revenue from the current level of $152,000 per year to over $476,000 in 1995, or an increase of over three times. The operating revenue estimates are believed to be reasonable in light of past experience at the Renton Municipal Airport and future general aviation activity forecast at the airport. Projections of Operating Expenses Salaries, wages and benefits have increased during the past 12 years an average of ,5.9 percent per year. These costs are projected to increase an average 10 percent per year over the next five years to account for increases in 'salaries and also increases in the percentage of the airport director and secretary's allocation which may occur during this time. From 1980 through 1995 the.,; average annual increase is estimated at six cents per year. It is projected that an allocation of approximately 60 percent use of an additional maintenance man will be required by 1981 , at an allocated cost of $12,000 per year, in- cluding fringe benefits. The costs of materials, supplies and services is projected to increase accord- ing to the following schedule. 123 I ;I 1976-1980 7% per year 1981-1985 5% per year 1986-1995 4% per year Although the historical average increase has been approximately 10.2 percent per year, much of the increase is due to the recent allocation of many of the city's other departments' expenses to the airport. Overall the airport operative expenses are projected to increase 3.7 times above the 1975 level of $74,000 per year to a 1995 level of $274,000. The net effect is a net operating income of $202,800 in 1995, which is 2.6 times the 1975 net operating income of over $77,000. • FINANCIAL PLAN Sources of Funds In addition to airport revenues, funds are available for financing airport de- velopments through three sectors other than the city: federal (Federal, Avia- tion Administration) , state (Washington Aeronautics Commission) , and private investors. The Airport and Airway Development Act of 1970 and subsequent amendments have provided funds through the Airport Aid Development Program (ADAP) for construction projects at air carrier and general aviation airports. Under the ammendments of 1976 items eligible for funding include land acquisi- tion, runways, taxiways, other aircraft operating areas, roadways, and non- revenue producing terminal areas. Excluded are facilities such as hangar buildings, FBO offices and other revenue producing items. General aviation airports, such as Renton Municipal Airport, are eligible for 90 percent :federal participation through fiscal year 1978 and 80 percent for the next two years (the ammendment extends through fiscal year 1980) . 124 - I The State of Washington will fund up to 50 percent of the local share of airport development costs. However, funds are extremely limited (the state total ,for the fiscal year 1975 1977 biennial is $562,000) and projects are approved on a priority basis. Primary surface improvements have first priority with second priority going to taxiways. Apron areas and land acquisition have,, lower priorities. Items such as hangars and other revenue items are generally not funded. Private funds are used for such improvements as T-hangars and aircraft main- tenance hangars. An examination of the funding received from state and federal sources for the last major construction program at Renton reveals that for the total project of approximately $1 ,400,000, $653,000 in ADAP funds were furnished and only $50,000 in Washington State Aeronautics Commission funds were received. Table IX-1 presents an estimate of the sources of funds to be received for the recommended development program at Renton Municipal Airport. State funds are considered to be negligible due to their historical low level and uncertainty .over the priority. Federal funds were assumed to be available at approximately 75 percent for all eligible projects. Although a higher level of federal funding is now provided, it is unrealistic to assume that all eligible projects at Renton Municipal Airport would be fully funded because applications for funds have historically exceeded the available limits. Private sector funds were estimated to be available for all of the 45 new T-hangar units. Revenues from these hangars built by private concerns have not been included in the revenue projections for the airport. As indicated in Table IX-1 , the federal government is expected to finance about $910,000 (or 60 percent) of the total development with the private sector financing approximately $406,000 (26 percent) , leaving the City of Renton responsible for financing 14 percent of the program or a total of approximately $211 ,000. 125 Cash Flow Analysis The city's share of estimated construction costs for the construction recommend- ed in the master plan can be obtained through net operating revenue of the airport. A projected cash flow analysis is given in Table IX-3. Adequate bond reserves were assumed. It is projected that the bond reserve account will , earn 5.5 percent interest. In addition to the bond reserve account, an adequate working cash reserve of at least $30,000 will be maintained at all times accord- ing to, projections. The financing plan also makes use of a Maintenance Reserve Account. The main- tenance reserve will fund runway overlays and other large maintenance items that may be needed in the future. It is recommended that initially $15,000 a year be placed in the reserve. Every five years, the reserve payment should increase by $5,000 to offset cost increases. In addition a Reserve for Obstruc- tion Removal has been established with deposits of $10,000 a year. The numbers in Table IX-3 are expressed in current-year dollars. It was es- timated that the capital improvement costs would increase at the rate of !8 per- cent per year through 1986 due to inflation. This results in an estimated cost to the city of approximately $384,000 (as compared with approximately $234,000 expressed in 1976 dollars) . 126 TABLE IX-3 PROJECTED CASH FLOW ANALYSIS (CURRENT YEAR DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) NET NON-OPERATING EXPENDITURES INCREASE NET INTEREST PAYMENT TO PAYMENT TO DEBT PAYMENT (DECREASE) CUMULATIVE OPERATING ON BOND MAINTENANCE OBSTACLE REMOVAL (PRINCIPAL & INTEREST) CAPITAL IN SURPLUS YEAR REVENUE RESERVE RESERVE RESERVE EXISTING BONDS IMPROVEMENTS SURPLUS (END OF YEAR) 1977 116.8 3.5 15.0 10.0 52.8 0.0 42.5 115.3 1978 111 .6 3.5 15.0. 10.0 .51 .6 16.8 21 .7 137.0 1979 108.8 3. 5 15.0 10.0 50.4 54.4 ( 17.5) 119.5 1980 125. 1 3.5 15.0 10.0 54.0 19.6 30.0 149.5 1981 131 .0 3.5 20.0 10.0 52.5 0.0 52.0 201 .5 1982 128.9 3.5 20.0 10.0 51 .0 0.0 51 .4 252.9 1983 127.3 3.5 20.0 10.0 49.5 21 .0 30.3 283.2 1984 125.2 3.5 20.0 10.0 52.9 22.7 23.1 306.3 1985 143.7 3.5 ' 20.0 10.0 51 . 1 146.9 ( 80.8) 225.5 1986 162.3 3.5 25.0 10.0 54. 1 102.9 ( 26.2) 199.3 1987 160.4 3.5 25.0 10.0 52.0 0.0 76.9 276.2 1988 158.0 3.5 25.0 10.0 49.8 0.0 76.7 352.9 1989 155. 1 3.5 25.0 10.0 52.5 0.0 71 . 1 424.0 1990 173.7 3.5 25.0 10.0 50.0 0.0 92.2 516.2 1991 191 .4 3.5 30.0 10.0 52.3 0.0 102.6 618.8 1992 188.5 3.5 30.0 10.0 49.5 0.0 102.5 721 .3. 1993 185. 1 3.5 30.0 10.0 51 .6 0.0 97.0 818.3 1994 180.9 3.5 30.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 144.4 962.7 1995 - 202.8 3.5 30.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 166.3 1129.0 = = 66.5 435.0 190.0 877•6 384.3 - - - . NOTE: Numbers may not total due to rounding. N v � ' me\ ® e� 0 ° (11.-) %�> z:�y:eeeee . �ecee x - / ( C- p . � C w Even though there are few improvements planned for the airport and sea- plane base, some environmental considerations are present. The complete envir- onmental assessment part of this master plan study has been documented in a separate report,._the Draft Environmental Impact Assessment Report, $ome of the highlights from that report are included in this chapter., The recommended development program - as presented in this report will result in some environmental changes. These are both in the human and natural environ- ments. On the airport, some of the recommended improvements include the taxi- way development, some apron improvements and the eventual construction of additional T-hangars,- the restaurant, and the possible installation of pre- cision navigational aids. 129 In the Draft Environmental Impact Assessment Report, the following items have been identified: 1 . Present and future air pollution from peak hour operations at Renton is minor and has little measurable impact on ambient air quality. 2. Though aviation activity at Renton will increase, air pollution will decrease by 82 percent after federal regulations affecting engine pollutant emissions come into effect 'in 1981 . This should result in an overall improvement in air quality in the area if all othernon- aviation activities remain constant. 3. Noise sensitive residential areas are impacted by existing general aviation seaplane activity at Renton. Land based general aviation operations do not impact noise sensitive residential land use, How- ever, preflight checkout procedures of jet passenger aircraft by the Boeing Commercial Aircraft Company impacts noise-sensitive residential areas to the east of the airport. Renton High School and two churches are also impacted by the weekday jet checkout procedures. 4. Noise from general aviation activity in 1995 will not impact noise sensitive residential land uses to the south of the airport. Annoyance from noise will increase with increased operations, but not too: severely. Restricting of seaplane operations to certain areas on Lake Washington will reduce noise impacts to residential land uses. 5. Due to parking lot construction, paving for aprons and taxiways, and building construction, approximately three acres of area will be added to the generally impervious ground condition of the airport. This will result in a slight increase in runoff to Lake Washington and into the lower reaches of the Cedar River. 130 6. The potential for fuel spills directly to Lake Washington from the operation of the seaplane facility will be present although mitigat- ing measures can control this. This represents a potential adverse impact to water quality. 7. Land uses surrounding the airport are generally commercial or industrial , and compatible with the activity of the airport. Northwest and west of the airport lie residential land uses which restrict expansion. 8. Qualitatively, the Renton Municipal Airport will contribute toward a shift from residential to commercial and industrial land uses in con- formance with the Renton Comprehensive Land Use Plan. Mitigating measures to reduce the impact of some of these environmental con- siderations have been included in the report. For example, the erosion asso- ciated with increased runoff from the paved areas will be limited because the runoff flows directly to Lake Washington and into the last reach of the Cedar River. Storm sewers will trap sediment to reduce this erosion. By paying close attention to construction techniques and timing during the construction of the recommended improvements, any adverse impacts to water quality will be limited and controlled. Federal regulations requiring the reduction in aircraft engine noise will serve to abate impacts to the noise sensitive areas. in addition, changes to the Renton zoning code and the Comprehensive Urban Land Use Plan can be incor- porated and enforced to mitigate noise related land use impacts. A program of property acquisition and land use conversion could be instituted, but this has not been recommended. Land use changes are expected to occur without this additional pressure. The acquisition of those parcels that have objects which penetrate the approach surface can be considered when these parcels are avail- able on the open market. 131 1 Fuel spills and activity at the seaplane base can be mitigated through incor- poration of design and architectural considerations and stringent operational controls. The environmental report mentions the following unavoidable adverse impacts : I . Increased storm water runoff. 1 2. Potential for fuel spills will remain. 3. Some noise impacts will remain. 4. Renton High School will continue to be impacted by noise from jet pre- flight checkout procedures. 5. Some athletic activities at Renton High School Stadium will be and are disrupted when they coincide with preflight engine tuning. These adverse effects are mitigated to some degree to lessen their overall im- pact on the environment. POST SCRIPT Without the excellent cooperation of the staff members at the City of Renton, the Federal Aviation Administration, the Washington Aeronautics Commission, and other agencies in the area, this study would have been immeasurably harder. This report summarizes the efforts of the consultant and the Technical Committee appointed by the city to produce a program of development for aviation activi- ties in the Renton area that will meet the long-term needs of the region. We believe that all topics have been included in these reports which have a bear- ing on the study, and trust that every avenue has been explored to provide a facility that is compatible with the community, yet is capable of promoting the growth of aviation. Renton has a facility in which it can be proud, and 132 the continued development of this facility will result in an airport and sea- plane base with the best reputation on the West Coast. 133 -C � le in , v aci, l renton municipal airport and will rogers - wiley post memorial seaplane base master plan summary report prepared for city of renton by Yt'fL washington The preparation of this document was financed in part through a planning grant from the Federal Aviation Administration as provided under Section 13 of the Airport and Airway Development Act of 1970. The contents of this report reflect the views of the staff of VTN Consolidated, Inc. and VTN Washington, Inc., that are responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policy of the FAA. Acceptance of this report by the FAA does not in any way constitute a commitment on the part of the United States to participate in any development depicted therein nor does it indicate that the proposed development is environmentally acceptable in accordance with Public Laws 91-190,91-258,and/or 90-245. renton nuniciocl ciroort • cnc will roger s - Wiley oost me-noricl sccolcne ocsc ncstcr ocn surnfficry report fcorucry 1978 oreoarec for city of renton, wcshington oreocrec oy \rho wcshincton, inc, anc \eh consolicctec, inc, • .,J ..,..,v 1:1 ...,:,..:.,,. • t .. ]'- ,III 1�*��' .1i "1110PA -`f,j .. s. .a j r^�VS./}:I•. R..�„ • f /:,‘S.::.., _ / " 1IYG0114\Cl�. _111�.w': n-. ® ■. 11 17 _'1" ll y.i' ; .� 'I I�vL �� : C. :,,. i, r. ,,,' . •'..till ,ii..0- . 't;i OA*, . .14‘.,4: r. ...•,/,',I• . I •-,-, ' -.' ,ii,•.;.., -- ., . o . iailidlry: :'l'i.:‘,•'' . (1'...:).....: \ 1 'U 31.- -11 17 „, ., •x,n x, '` u ' . lt, fxe '9. C .„,,,,,tN,, ,mod "I'. '4: :; KING COUNTY .. 3 i� �6][,Y-' . :4p 'w, te • s,�: "•;>� INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT i'f:'% i, .. ° 2.r_ =1 ,. ','Ii‘.".•..-1"•'-II:.•A 1'-....,1!7: :.. %.. •!' (BOEING FIELD) - /::_ssr 1:. - 1V., t y,,..., 1 \ \tp P.^. -i ..L,•il.�: ''i {. "t1 .il /a.:t m. :�ti / '4 i:t.` ._7' - _ 1 :.1:;-':: p j '"i LAKE n u j( 'd .V 'p4•-C.::'./'',1.,I'.=-.1,:':"-•_:•;'d:.,.,-.:—vJ,',,4,......',,"__,4''*,4•;.:,'...:...T•...•,..k.,,.•"I--',..-.-.4,.,.,,•.1.4'I I,t1 II1\1,I:•""*.V•i.. °m,.A,,.'„\.°...'..fe.'':;.?s•:, l: i 0i - - 11 1,{! WASHINGTON N" - •;a. , . A . i i 'rl'LC. , 1•-„1.. -''`1i. 1'}, Renn✓1.`rc=, • ::h/ '..,,. ,:, I ' '.—.'A F� k ►iVIWw. �• \ is • _ k,•. 5 n ih.).'.:.''•i,I .•, ' `;-9•, }•F i •, Ilan) • 1 '' .... , • .RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT y= s '_ ' , :;' te " 41 I-14.'•,.4.k k1'21.t.t,:,••t.t-,;.':,,....-.,.,•:-...,,:?:4.-'"..-,i,•-,.•.•,..•:...;•...'•.•' • -I--,A,, s'' ;1 '`i• •+ WILL ROGERS — WILEY POST •. - 1, --, � ,-4--"W� "' • MEMORIAL SEAPLANE BASE -�, • , 1, { ; !). :r 1 y, {,�• 1 ,. •a• :l" �:.:.,, t,.' �' -� '0 1� xr 'wt', ([wU'Iy.: - ".s ..i,..' .,i'p_. 4,1� I , I \.' !:`:\ i t-k, , ..„ `�'_s -.I r! 4.41d 1:9`+, , ,. :1 11v�`2VP/9UTd. .51 11s\ " 1 %:fie \t, ' II -f/ o• I 1 i. .±., '1 '�` ; ,i 0� a"pan • "ii'• :M,�`,, . , r1 —''14 ' ,. t ;1,1 �i 11. f,:. �: \' 1 "••' laa '.'`lily... 1,y 1, 4'� 1).R.ENTON'r 1 r■ • 5,v,. . i l ,° -gm .�� - fi ::iF• •:3- '� .-, � 'e:bx ' h .:4,':..1 - I;,,\ 's "I :. i(IIfw61s'. i wre,... ' Y. ` u -'r� . ' a .Ili .. __',-- — , :/ � r:= ''� F Y e_._ "� -1� P�.:i..��� �,• � I: x®■.�~tom • ▪ "• `�;•.�..,% ; - INTERNATIONAL• • • •AIRPORT .Fa ' ° . �i'l 1 + `' II- `14, -rn..l, �7 -Y.. .: `-f: �Iaxs -m' % x➢:r'-,' 'ie •,is+ .:'Lxxt f . .. /1,1 ,., . '.3'.8 ,:,,.-i.,_,,,-x, .'.,)!1„..... .."1. %1C,„-..!..... ....• ,... , , . .., ,, ', /' s 1•i 3 II II II II I II • occ <grounc • .... • • initiated, funded jointly by the Federal Aviation Administration, the Washington State Aeronautics Commission, and the City of Renton, Washington. The objective of this study was to develop a plan for providing the necessary facilities to best accommodate the aviation requirements of the airport and seaplane base over the next 20 years, yet Renton Municipal Airport, located on the south shore be compatible with the surrounding community and of Lake Washington -- really two airports, one servic- consistent with other city goals. The problems to be ing land operations and the other servicing float specifically addressed were those associated with the planes--has been providing service to the aviation impact on the shoreline and adjacent environment, community in the Renton area for the past 50 years. the limited airport property available for Originally a short turf strip, the airport has been de- development, and the potential for providing a veloped through the years as an important transporta- precision instrument approach. The resulting airport tion center in the Puget Sound region. Partially re- development plan is the product of careful sponsible for this role is the seaplane activity which consideration of many alternatives from aeronautical, has operated adjacent to the airport in the area which environmental and economic standpoints. is now named the Will Rogers-Wiley Post Memorial Seaplane Base. Since the early 1940s, the airport This document briefly highlights the conclusions of has provided checkout and takeoff capability for the master planning study. Technical findings are ' military and commercial aircraft manufactured by described in two companion reports: the Draft the Boeing Commercial Aircraft Company. The Environmental Impact Assessment Report, describing airport's growth has been instrumental to the develop- potential effects on the environment, and the Master ment of a sound economy in the Renton area. Plan Report, which presents the supporting material and justifies the conclusions of the study. These Recently, it has been recognized that further airport reports are available for review at the Renton Munici- improvements are needed. To create a plan for such pal Building, Office of the Airport Director (fourth improvements, an airport master planning study was floor). 2 curront ciroort CCQCCity Pritrik )0N M1FYiy 140.4•,^ i ;�7 t l\tM d• 'ill . y,:_�� . r. �i: I ' II Three fixed base operators (FBOs) are located on the llll airport and, together, provide a full range of services: III major and minor repairs, aircraft sales, charter I I II services, flight instruction and aircraft storage. In II addition, there ate aircraft painting, modification and The airfields, consists of a single asphalt and concrete manufacturing facilities on the airport property. runway, known as Runway 15/33, with a full parallel taxiway brill nl the west side (Taxiway "A") and partial The majority g of the aircraft storage hangars are parallel taxiway at the southeast end. Specific located at the southeast corner of the airport and on features areli the east side midway along the runway. Aircraft II o Physical length of 5,379 feet and width of tiedown areas for general aviation aircraft are located 20011ifeet, with a threshold displacement of throughout the airport. Boeing leases three large 35011jfeet at the south end aprons for storage of its production aircraft. • Medium intensity runway lighting system Today, approximately 190 aircraft are based at the • A VIIASI-2 system on each end of the runway airport. Nearly 140,000 operations (takeoffs and landings) were conducted in 1977. Radar instriument approaches by Area Navigation (RNAV) tolliRunway 33 and Surveillance Radar to If all available unused areas were occupied and Runway 15111' are available. Current minimums are optimum use was made of all space, it is estimated 900 feet ceiling and one-mile visibility. There are no the airport could accommodate approximately 210 precision instrument approaches to the field, which based aircraft. In addition, space would be available would allow lower minimums. The FAA Air Traffic for about 16 transient aircraft. The based aircraft Control Tower operates from 7:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. capacity of the field would be expanded to about 290 seven days a week. if Taxiway "A" were relocated closer to the runway. 3 . w r. .' .vats �-_ ‘,_ .a . , , 1114 ir' * J'a air° '` , � Atf/f , .T"• . k u`1,- � i� R� :F~ K' f.ai "►"'^" E 1 .f i tom. «,, : a J �. .. yr`-r Vet • ��:. y � ~��•�. '> ;� T �.• ;+T ice. ,� ,�" r, ,� "' "�' � '�' 4 .P 'y x e.� . . M -Y _ ._,. j„lrr..r" _ .tom ''''-or..- 4 .•17-07.: .' t lac cc.n ' } iCt". / +. \ . 4 44 _....g• �• i O �' II ! O •. 11 a fir;' f !' a m CJ Q C . a+r` '� C )` 'r` R��eC r. .2 } IOW � Oi CO i CO CO .Ceaal MUNICIPAL AIRPURt _-=\ c ` +� ° ' " RENT�N Cu ti_ , .� cna CO.CD - ' CO '. CCD Q ice. , �k r ►'j e. -, a'�le A _ °' CD -IC x __ , . . a _h i ors# w* ;at „ -, s . . r a pi M J . Fs o cvdo o mon oclterncfives ( -. 1L2 ot.i:. - , „.;,, sal .ice. :At .-, 4 ., Four alternatives were evaluated, which are feasible, Alternative 3: Provide for limited growth for depending on the amount of expansion and airport and seaplane base within practical commitment of resources desired: capacity restraints. Under this alternative, land acquisition is limited to the expansion of the Alternative 1: Continue the facility "as is." The seaplane base. Seaplane facility improvements airfield is maintained, with no major include the acquisition of approximately two improvements (runways, taxiways, aprons and acres of land adjacent to the shore northwest of navaids). The city continues to encourage the the field, the marking and lighting of a waterlane, tenants to construct their own facilities and make and the construction of two floating docks and a other standard improvements. Because the airport fueling dock. property is not expanded, the areas available for leasing remain approximately what they are Alternative 4: Provide for limited growth for the today. airport and minimum improvements for the seaplane facility. The improvements Alternative 2: Add facilities to accommodate contemplated for the airport in the preceding continuing, unlimited growth. At the other end of alternative are identical in this alternative. The the spectrum is the alternative of expanding the improvements to the seaplane facility, however, airport to its maximum in an attempt to provide include only new ramps and a floating dock (no the capacity for total unconstrained demand (456 acquisition of land). An option under this based aircraft in 1995). To provide for this alternative, which helps to overcome the shortage number of aircraft requires land acquisition on of general aviation parking space, is to relocate the northwest side of the field, the utilization of Taxiway "A"closer to the runway. areas now leased by Boeing, and possibly the expansion of the airport across Airport Way. ALTERNATIVE 4 (with Taxiway "A" Year 1995 1 2 3 4 Relocation) Based Aircraft 200 456 235 210 290 Annual Operations 190,000 340,000 220,000 200,000 220,000 5 , 1 1 crtrcffic forcccsts 4,...-Ic4,-..:::.„0,...-4- ; . ,,.I.,,. ...4. 4,„ ,Ilicr On the basis of testimony presented at a public it will undergo considerable change over the next 20 hearing on August 31, 1976, and thorough years. As demand for use of the 'limited facilities • consideration of all relevant factors, it was concluded increases, a larger proportion of aviation, activity at that the best development option for Renton Renton Municipal will be for business uses!as opposed Municipal Airport is a course of constrained growth to pleasure flying. Consequently, the trend toward of the airport facilities with minimum seaplane larger general aviation aircraft will continue. improvement(Alternative 4). Under the assumption that a precision) instrument Although growth in overall aviation activity at approach system would be installed at the airport, Renton Municipal will be limited, the character of the instrument operations will increase to 17,000 (8'/2% airport and the corresponding types of aircraft using of the total) by 1995. i , ACTIVITY 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 1995* \ Based Aircraft Total 187 210 210 210 210 290 Single-Engine 164 177 170 164 158 217 - Multiengine 22 32 38 44 50 1 70 Rotary 1 1 2 2 2 3 Land Planes 161 181 181 181 181 250 Seaplanes 29 29 29 29 29 i 40 Annual Operations Total 118,000 160,000 180,000 200,000 200,000. ; 220,000 Interent 53,000 70,000 83,000 96,000 100,000 110,000 Local (Training) 65,000 90,000 97,000 . 104,000 100,000 i i 110,000 Instrument Operations 3,089 6,400 13,500 16,000 17,000 I l 18,700 ; *With relocation of Taxiway"A." , I 6 I I I 1 I • 11 I I II li croort ocns I1 iI III y i . .4C 11 t rn!esaff.re• IYAPNI 1 le&e Ssv lcac•:u.Gad: ,iai;ii»;/"1/4;iin 111 11 11,11 Roadways, Parking and Fencing: A vehicle parking lot will be constructed on the east side of the field. Security gates will be installed at the perimeter road on the south side of Taxiway "L." Perimeter fencing and parking lot fencing will be placed in the vicinity of the restaurant site. 11 Hangars and Other Buildings: Seven T-hangar buildings will be constructed in the northwest fhe followiling improvements have been incorporated corner of the field. Several miscellaneous hangars into the airport master plan to provide the best will be removed and an airport maintenance and possible facilities within the constraints of the site. storage facility will be built. Taxiways and Aprons: Several exit taxiways will Landing Aids: Although further testing by the be relocated and/or widened. A portion of FAA is necessary to determine whether a Taxiwaylll1"A" will be reconstructed in the short microwave precision approach landing system term. A Ipomplete overlay of Taxiway "A" will be (MLS) is feasible at Renton, site location and costs are identified in the master plan. The necessarj) in the intermediate term (or if cost-effective, the taxiway will be relocated installation of an MLS would also require high toward the runway at an estimated cost of intensity runway lights and precision runway $1,025,000 including lighting and marking). New markings. Medium intensity taxiway lights will be aircraft Itiedown areas will be paved on the installed on all new and widened taxiways. A new southeast corner and east side (with new Non-directional Beacon (NDB) is presently under connector taxiways) of the airport. application for installation on the northeast corner of the field. Seaplane 1 Facilities: New seaplane facilities will consist of a seaplane ramp, floating dock, and an Other: Other improvements include increasing the access ro'id between the restaurant (currently height of the dike along Cedar River and under construction) and the shoreline. installation of utilities to the restaurant site. 7 I t ESTIMATED COST* IMPROVEMENT DEVELOPMENT ITEM Total, City Federal Private. PERIOD** A.J TAXIWAYS AND APRONS I Al Relocate and widen Taxiway "G" $ 38,200 $ 9,550 $ 28,650 $ - 1 I A2 Widen Taxiway "F" 7,000 1,750 5,250 - • S A3 Reconstruct portion of Taxiway"A" 27,000 6,750 20,250 - . S A4 Complete overlay of Taxiway"A" 337,000 84,250 252,750 - ' i 1 A5 New aircraft parking area (south side) 14,000 3,500 10,500 - • S A6 New aircraft parking area (east side) 45,500 11,380 34,120 - S A7 Construct Taxiways"M"&"N" 75,000 18,750 56,250 - I S Subtotal $543,700 $135,930 $407,770 $ - B. SEAPLANE FACILITIES B1 Construct seaplane ramp $ 25.000 $ 6,250 $ 18,750 $ - S B2 Construct floating dock 13,000 3,250 9,750 - S ,B3 Construct seaplane area access road 3,000 • 750 2,250 - S B4 Seaplane facilities engineering 12,000 3,000 9,000 - i S ' Subtotal $ 53,000 $ 13,250 $ 39,750 $ - C. ROADWAYS,PARKING,FENCING Cl Construct auto parking lot(east side) $ 3,800 $ 950 $ 2,850 $ - 'r S C2 Security gates on south side of Taxiway"L" 600 150 450 - S C3 Perimeter fencing around restaurant site 4,000 1,000 3,000 - S C4 Parking lot fencing(northwest corner) 6,100 1,530 4,570 - S Subtotal $ 14,500 $ 3,630 $ 10,870 $ -• D. HANGARS,BUILDINGS D1 T-hangar buildings (7) $327,700 $ - $ - $327,700 ' I D2 Airport maintenance 62,250 15,570 46,680 - S D3 Demolition and removal of hangars 1,500 380 1,120 - . S Subtotal $391,450 $ 15,950 $ 47,800 $327,700 E. LANDING AIDS I El Medium intensity taxiway lights (MITL) $ 6,500 $ 1,630 $ 4,870 $ I E2 Install high intensity runway lights(HIRL) 10,200 2,550 7,650 - I ' E3 Add precision runway markings 3,000 750 2,250 - I E4 Microwave Landing System 250,000 - 250,000 - I ' • Subtotal $269,700 $ 4,930 $264,770 $ - I F. OTHER Fl Improvement of dike along Cedar River $ 8,600 $ 8,600 $ - $ - S ' F2 Installation of utilities(restaurant site) 26,000 6,500 19,500 - S j Subtotal $ 34,600 $ 15,100 $ 19,500 $ = ; I 1 I 1 CONSTRUCTION COST $1,306,950 $188,790 $790,460 $327,700 ENGINEERING,ADMINISTRATIVE,SALES TAX, i 'ICONTINGENCIES 313,276 45,253 189,473 78,550 1 ►TOTAL DEVELOPMENT COST $1,620,226 $234,043 $979,933 406,250 . * 1976 Dollars • :1** Short-term (S)=1978-1982. Intermediate-term (I)=1983-1988. l . Refer to illustration on following page for location of planned improvements. / I 8 • • 4 ' .0—. '' 10) r/c---7-----------''' 11 '1 ■.a`i ■ i ►w' �►`7� (Irlatiertr. * fii�� �� ��J ��`� �' �� a' "_"`"�'--=-'���V�� =�-�����i�v-�,1,���.1 �■I�Ij1:11:41k:li;fill::!1:1v r 0�,,.,!of� � � \ ,�"�c�.����: '� � a o �►��� o f �/I r I 1 \� ir-ii' Hr �maiii "t VEof � _ "- E � .�'` ki411111.06 iMI Ex°+ P^'ft" 00 °� —' �E a .,✓'ram �;E�.!� _w:•""° ■a �, " m ��\ lr_�I�7_° ' `i.� �� �- �_ p`e, ��` a N i�i©Im 1 ~`'* --'-'4N ��� �_ 'azr __ E SO.� 1�., PNIxG a D z Q a '=1 Di I� II J ,'V/ ,� — w_a:.' _c.� —_— -- :a �'•y .- _-The puros a °' p 'zt �: I� I I'I I.I' [A� ZI Fq Ca��'c� p U-❑. A l IE�O� COnTPOt TOWER WITX .zoa • • I r f jzO.z I Ip I LDLV EPBLE . I10 UNIT KA I i,A'f.. 2■i®AIRPORT BEACOx A e.PL __ APRL BRL P BE (:.' I �� - .r D STRUCTURE ,zT° ARP .riP -__ z.r APRL `� �lb ' 0.--. ."'I —•z J • m lit A 1 RL LL�.�� m '/ r.r�.�. '� IOO gI�• .•M r F P F �iA%IWAYTO BE CLOSED 1_ 0 . ,., ..t,„,_._ ., . . n _ - : 'AY ousN N05° 54156°W (TRUE) ° + 0111 �• (p Dril II 115379'RUNWAY yo 350'DISPLACED THR ROW, .es..,,Illi. • W , . ,,,,i--.., ,, ,, ..y .0 z.A --a tlF^: (HIR�FUTURE) $I�.... ' II=u . 1. 8 ._�.�--�„� •: • . ---. • 0 / ° / Y.,...„„ .UTU, APRON NO I-I�__0°- _ TU_ .•RS�o iFr�iTIRxE ,r* .s .. �._�� _� reN !l�fl!! cEILOMErEP r __ � C�LEE�GxLE fI� O 0 `, BRLap .O p7-L BRL t��'• - , 7ITIEE ' ` V _ SINITEDAR0A0 AI .s— °CD 7:1 p OVE,BLq . .... O Y. „p RIVER SERVICE PF. �� Q ', , E. STRUCTU ES F p J -- E` CEILOMETER ��'�, ET-�� %;'.O t�5 z �!F E x O#'S 4 �IIP �E pECEIv DIO TPANSM1rTEP- �%���` Il • _ ER M• o ®L I _ — � wl'""".■�-� L =...F SITE f, -- ( lEO AOCESS ` �IP VCO �. / O ,,.#a r A NO PUBLIC ACLES' BERYICE ft --_. a p ° BEYOND MS Polx B. m F !t� / RDApDPT SERVICE . a 64O AIRCRAFT BRIDGE13 600 AIRPORTYR FOR BOEING USE +� au ,, .PERT .•E ( ° .r, %" IN N I # ` ++�,1� I IxL n G q 1 �E_.� zpIFCRPFi 1O�Fp F%I z �'//sp rtrIJ - V pa"'"L BOEING MANUFACTURING 1-1 ° / r r ' IQ P FACILITY ul11`I rE"� Cil ii7 44 .:. -.0 ,, b °EDGgry �= 'h 1 %` 1 qA,,,,. L SIR .z g� fu ti~ --) F ° k a n a_ c I 3o EB 0 cnv ron men o • issues ,..,:,..„.,„:„.„1„.,,.,.,,...„...„,„,:, ii. .4.::.•:':: :n. 'i;.,:::• ip" '!��;,J, The continued operation of Renton Municipal Lake Washington will reduce noise impacts to Airport and the implementation of the recommended residential areas along the shore. development program will result in changes to both ' the-human and natural environment — some adverse • Approximately three acres would be added to and some beneficial. the generally impervious ground condition of the airport, due to parking lot construction, Among the specific impacts identified in the Draft paving for aprons and taxiways, and building Environmental Impact Assessment Report, are the construction. This would result in a slight following: increase in runoff to Lake Washington and • Present and future air pollution from aircraft into the lower reaches of the Cedar River. operations at Renton Municipal Airport during peak hours is minor and has little • The potential for fuel spills directly into Lake measurable impact on ambient air quality. Washington from the operation of the seaplane facility will be present although • Residential areas along the Lake Washington mitigating measures can control this. shoreline are impacted by general aviation seaplane activity at Renton. Although • Land uses surrounding the airport are . land-based general aviation operations do not generally commercial or industrial, and impact residential areas, engine checkout compatible with the activity of the airport. procedures of production aircraft by 'the Northwest and west of the airport lie Boeing Commercial Aircraft Company impact residential land uses which restrict expansion. residential areas to the east of the airport. The airport will contribute toward a shift Renton High School and two churches are from residential to commercial and industrial also affected by the weekday engine checkout land uses in conformance, withi the Renton procedures. Comprehensive Land Use Plan. • Noise from general aviation activity in 1995 • The improvements to the airport will result in will not impact noise-sensitive residential land improved operational safety for general uses to the south of the airport. Annoyance aviation users. In addition, recreational users from noise will grow with increased of Lake Washington should benefit from the operations, but not too severely. Restriction control of seaplane operations to specific of seaplane operations to certain areas on areas on the lake. 10 1