The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutzR-4140SetO It O 0 LU w 0 H U) Q w I w N_ C� w Z w �I H LU LU 2 U) Sheet Title GENERAL 1 COVER PAGE/SHEET INDEX 2 SITE PLAN/KEY MAP SITE PLANS 3 SITE PLAN (PAGE 1 OF 30) 4 SITE PLAN (PAGE 2 OF 30) 5 SITE PLAN (PAGE 3 OF 30) 6 SITE PLAN (PAGE 4 OF 30) 7 SITE PLAN (PAGE 5 OF 30) 8 SITE PLAN (PAGE 6 OF 30) 9 SITE PLAN (PAGE 7 OF 30) 10 SITE PLAN (PAGE 8 OF 30) 11 SITE PLAN (PAGE 9 OF 30) 12 SITE PLAN (PAGE 10 OF 30) 13 SITE PLAN (PAGE 11 OF 30) 14 SITE PLAN (PAGE 12 OF 30) 15 SITE PLAN (PAGE 13 OF 30) 16 SITE PLAN (PAGE 14 OF 30) 17 SITE PLAN (PAGE 15 OF 30) 18 SITE PLAN (PAGE 16 OF 30) 19 SITE PLAN (PAGE 17 OF 30) 20 SITE PLAN (PAGE 18 OF 30) 21 SITE PLAN (PAGE 19 OF 30) 22 SITE PLAN (PAGE 20 OF 30) 23 SITE PLAN (PAGE 21 OF 30) 24 SITE PLAN (PAGE 22 OF 30) 25 SITE PLAN (PAGE 23 OF 30) 26 SITE PLAN (PAGE 24 OF 30) 27 SITE PLAN (PAGE 25 OF 30) 28 SITE PLAN (PAGE 26 OF 30) 29 SITE PLAN (PAGE 27 OF 30) 30 SITE PLAN (PAGE 28 OF 30) 31 SITE PLAN (PAGE 29 OF 30) 32 SITE PLAN (PAGE 30 OF 30) 33 STRUCTURE TYPES (APPENDIX A) 34 CONSTRUCTION SCENARIOS (APPENDIX B) MITIGATION PLAN 35 TALBOT MITIGATION PLAN (SHEET 1 OF 6) 36 TALBOT PLANTING PLAN (SHEET 2 OF 6) 37 HONEY DEW CREEK HABITAT TREE PLAN (SHEET 3 OF 6) 38 PLANTING, SOIL PREP & HABITAT DETAILS (SHEET 4 OF 6) 39 PLANTING & MITIGATION NOTES (1 OF 2) (SHEET 5 OF 6) 40 PLANTING & MITIGATION NOTES (2 OF 2) (SHEET 6 OF 6) 0 0.25 0.5 Mile MAP CREATED BY: F)"'Z SOURCES: Topo Basemap - ESRI Online,Transmission Line - PSE APPLICANT: Ryan Wieder Puget Sound Energy P.O. Box 97034, Bellevue WA 98009-9734 (425) 999 - 2244 ACREAGE IN RENTON: 44.5 acres SUBMITTED TO: AP % % CITY OF OR) RENTON Nbap Planning/Building/Public Works Dept. DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING Scott Warlick 4/13/2021 01 ,051111114, PLANNING DIVISION APPROVED 04/13/2021 jding energizeEASTSIDE COVER PAGE/SHEET INDEX R-414 0 0 0 Date: Dec 2020 CD 0 0 w LL I 0 H rn Q Lu Lu N U Lu z Lu V H Lu Lu U) Renton 29 N 3 V K 27 t.4� 26 r 23 21 - -- !'�.. e n 22 2 19 25 n 24 S J 17 y _ 1Q e V ++ r u 15 1h V Y b v 14 C l � r I � T fC \ 1 n _ u J 0 0.25 0.5 0 I 1 1 Mile MAP CREATED BY: SOURCES: Topo Basemap - ESRI Online,Transmission Line - PSE APPLICANT: Ryan Wieder Puget Sound Energy P.O. Box 97034, Bellevue WA 98009-9734 (425) 999 - 2244 ACREAGE IN RENTON: 44.5 acres 13 11 12 Renton 10 �7 SUBMITTED TO: CITY OF OR) RENTON Nbov Planning/Building/Public Works Dept. 900 J L- Newcastle 7 � ��z' 1 IT, 5 King d 6 County{y S �i 4 3 \ 1 2 �7 e � energizeEASTSIDE SITE PLAN/KEY MAP R-414001 Date: Dec 2020 W 0 U) Q W I W N_ 0 W W Z W M W W 2 fn MProject Corridor OProposed Pole Location Existing Pole Location — To Be Removed Transmission Line - Proposed Transmission Line - Existing 517 Proposed Pole Number C-16 Structure Type (See Appx. A) Al Construction Scenario Key (See Appx. B) - Potential Stringing Site Recommended Access- Proposed Pole Olympic Underground Pipline (Approx. Location) - • Wastewater Utility Line - • Water Utility Line Underground Gas Utility Line - - - Underground Phone/TV Utility Line - - - Underground Power Utility Line - - Unknown Underground Utility Line ^M^- Stream Wetland OWetland or Stream Buffer Landslide Hazard Landslide Hazard 50ft Buffer ® Steep Slope Steep Slope 50ft Buffer Erosion Hazard Parcel L - City Jurisdiction Boundary Profile View Structure Conductor Ground Line Major Elevation Grid - - - Major Station Grid - Minor Station Grid 0 25 50 I I I Feet 1 inch = 50 feet SOURCES: Roads and Parcels - King County (2015), Aerial - King County (2015); Streams, Wetlands and Buffers, Landslide Hazard and Buffers, and Steep Slopes and Buffers from Watershed Company (2017). For cartographic purposes only. Note: Note: Underground utility lines are surveyed in the vicinity of poles only. Existing Lake Tradition poles aren't represented by new conductors because they are an existing line, and are being represented due to the poles being replaced. MAP EXTENT N c a st/ era L d SITE PLAN BASED ON PSE ENGINEERING DESIGN REVISION N Page 1 of 30 R-414002 Date: Dec 2020 CD 0 0 W W 0 U) U) Q W W� fJ U W Z W w W 2 Y) ,kk ► w rah: � a•.�''�. 411 47. H .'-z ^. -r n. - r,•i `fir -.i •�� _ �. •.Y -- f�. r s..• `E —. �' .. { '~� ' �{ 14� s '�4 'Iti N :•. `�r.�j,,, i : r'� 3345100 450 ! '- _!� _ y r J• TJ�._:. hTM�y] ��.� +�' M"�. i �1. `� �- ,,, 4�,. .�* ry''+• tI i • 1. +� ti' `�F j is Swt-., Fr �4 . ,`,} y +� G y {,h - y iNk .1 }'~4 mot.._ -�a ,f i ,11 SCDE60 1 •1 ,1 1 ii• 501 .25 11 :1 4•1 ----- --..-------440 -_ __ -- -_ 420 :1 360 CD C340320 MProject Corridor Q Potential Stringing Site ^^r^- Stream Parcel MAP EXTENT SITE PLAN 0 Proposed Pole Location Recommended Access- Proposed Pole � Wetland i--- L - City Jurisdiction Boundary 0 25 I I 50 I Feet Q) Ne CaS"t/ .�� Existing Pole Location— Olympic Underground O Wetland or Stream Buffer Profile View 1 inch = 50 feet Z ''� r • • To Be Removed Pipline (Approx. Location) Landslide Hazard Structure SOURCES: Roads and Parcels - King County (2015), Aerial Transmission Line - Proposed Wastewater Utility Line Landslide Hazard 50ft Buffer Conductor King County (2015); Streams, Wetlands and Buffers, Landslide Hazard and Buffers, and Steep Slopes and in BASED ON PSE ENGINEERING Transmission Line - Existing Water Utility Line ® Steep Slope Ground Line Buffers from Watershed Company (2017). For DESIGN REVISION N 517 Proposed Pole Number p Underground Gas Utility Line O Steep Slope 50ft Buffer Major Elevation Grid cartographic purposes only. Renton C-16 Structure Type (See Appx. A) — — — Underground Phone/TV Utility Line — — — Erosion Hazard — — — Major Station Grid Note:Note: Underground utility lines are surveyed in the vicinity of poles only. Existing Lake Tradition poles aren't L d �. Page 2 of 30 Al Construction Scenario Key (See Appx. B) Underground Power Utility Line Minor Station Grid represented by new conductors because they are an Unknown Underground Utility Line existing line, and are being represented due to the poles ±-414003 Date: Dec 2020 being replaced. ^^ W W 0) w z J 2 U a W 0 V) H U) Q W I W N_ 0 W W Z W r H W W 2 U) MProject Corridor - Potential Stringing Site ^^r^- Stream Parcel MAP EXTENT O Proposed Pole Location Recommended Access- Proposed Pole Wetland L j City Jurisdiction Boundary 215 IOFeet Q ( Ne we a stly _ L4� GO Existing Pole Location- Olympic Underground O Wetland or Stream Buffer Profile View 1 inch = 50 feet To Be Removed Pipline (Approx. Location) Landslide Hazard Structure SOURCES: Roads and Parcels - King County (2015), Aerial Transmission Line - Proposed ---' Wastewater Utility Line Landslide Hazard 50ft Buffer Conductor King County (2015); Streams, Wetlands and Buffers, Landslide Hazard and Buffers, and Steep Slopes and d Transmission Line - Existing — — — Water Utility Line ® Steep Slope Ground Line Buffers from Watershed Company (2017). For 517 Proposed Pole Number p Underground Gas Utility Line � Steep Slope 50ft Buffer Major Elevation Grid cartographic purposes only. Renton C-16 Structure Type (see Appx. A) - - - Underground Phone/TV Utility Line Erosion Hazard - - — Major Station Grid Note:Note: Underground utility lines are surveyed in the vicinity of poles only. Existing Lake Tradition poles aren't L r Al Construction Scenario — — — Underground Power Utility Line represented by new conductors because they are an Key (see Appx. B) — — Unknown Underground Utility Line - Minor Station Grid existing line, and are being represented due to the poles being replaced. SITE PLAN BASED ON PSE ENGINEERING DESIGN REVISION N R-414004 Page 3 of 30 Date: Dec 2020 W W x co W Z J x U Q O O W W 0 U) Q W WI N (D IX LU Z W T I— LU LLI U) A (PROTECT J WATER MAIN IN PLACE �AV DURING POLE INSTALLATION �r'/•. `•�'� ' Al 44r / . —z' `. . 0 eq 318 C-17A r... C1- ! r M-, .." i&r rk • a _ -a = :ram � 319 -. C-17A C1 -. .. .'r., - 4�:. -. :a •-. • r• `r -' -' .,ate. �A. - 318 C-17B ■ 70 C1 r'a / / .ISR i _ / -` /:, LW i�3-- r LS�T'� !F^'�--.I� - 1 660 640 ' I - 620 T 3/7 I 60o DCT2D i 3/9 Sao 90FT 3/8 SCHDE5 560 STA=197+97.16 I SCHDE5 EAST 050FT/WEST 050FT 540 HT=77FT ELE=444.87 I STA=200+3.60 STA=203+76.41 520 I EAST 050FT/WEST 050FT HT=50FT ELE=440.87 500 I 239 i ELE = 438.00 361 ' a 440 I I I I �� 420 I ro 400 to ' a 380 i � MProject Corridor Q Potential Stringing Site ^^— Stream Parcel MAP EXTENT SITE PLAN Proposed Pole Location � Recommended Access- Proposed Pole � Wetland L� City Jurisdiction Boundary ® a z5 5a I I I Feet I 'cat' l IVe ( .�� Existing Pole Location- Olympic Underground O Wetland or Stream Buffer Profile View 1 inch = 50 feet • • To Be Removed Pipline (Approx. Location) Landslide Hazard Structure SOURCES: Roads and Parcels - King County (2015), Aerial Transmission Line- Proposed Wastewater Utility Line Landslide Hazard 50ft Buffer Conductor -King County (2015); Streams, Wetlands and Buffers, Landslide Hazard and Buffers, and Steep Slopes and d BASED ON PSE ENGINEERING Transmission Line Existing Water Utility Line ® Steep Slope Ground Line Buffers from Watershed Company(2017). �� :% DESIGN REVISION N 5517 Proposed Pole Number p Underground Gas Utility Line � Steep Slope 50ft Buffer Major Elevation Grid For cartographic purposes only. Renton C-16 Structure Type (See Appx. A) Construction Scenario — — — Underground Phone/TV Utility Line — — — Underground Power Utility Line Erosion Hazard — — — Major Station Grid Note:Note: Underground utility lines are surveyed in the vicinity of poles only. Existing Lake Tradition poles aren't d 1 �. Page 4 of 30 R-414005 Al represented by new conductors because they are an � Key (See Appx. B) Unknown Underground Utility Line Minor Station Grid existing line, and are being represented due to the poles Date: Dec 2020 being replaced. ^^ M H W W 2 N W Z J 2 U 0 IT O W H LU 0 C0 U) Q LU LU N_ IX LU Z LU its f+, rr i t r \x j+ r+++ ��w�r 4 �r + + ,K ++ r ar •arr. � F r i r + - d230. - - - lisp 3 PROTECT WATER MAIN AND C LINE IN PLACE DURING POLE REMOVAL MA 46 Jt \� SIDEWALKS SHALL BE RESTORED TO CITY OF RENTON TRENCH AND RESTORATION ".- STANDARDS. x 600 o 600 a 580 I I 580 1 3/6 1 a 560 1 1 560 w 540 1 DCT2D 1 540 v 520 i 95FT 1 520 o soo i STA=191+72.13 i soo a8o 1 HT=80FT ELE=401.63 1 a8o 1 -, 615 " 460 m n 1 460 5 440 8 I 440 420 420 d 400 �r 1 1 400 t 380 1 380 360 i c 360 1 m 1 340 320 10 1 320 a 300 1 1 300 Project Corridor Q Potential Stringing Site ^^— Stream Parcel MAPEXTENTSITE PLAN 0 Proposed Pole Location Recommended Access- Proposed Pole � Wetland L j City Jurisdiction Boundary 0I 215 50 Feet Q l Ne we a stl� _ .�� Existing Pole Location- Olympic Underground O Wetland or Stream Buffer Profile View 1 inch = 50 feet '� • • To Be Removed Pipline (Approx. Location) Landslide Hazard Structure SOURCES: Roads and Parcels - King County (2015), Aerial Transmission Line- Proposed Wastewater Utility Line Landslide Hazard 50ft Buffer Conductor -King County (2015); Streams, Wetlands and Buffers, Landslide Hazard and Buffers, and Steep Slopes and d BASED ON PSE ENGINEERING Transmission Line - Existing Water Utility Line ® Steep Slope Ground Line Buffers from Watershed Company (2017). For DESIGN REVISION N 517 Proposed Pole Number p Underground Gas Utility Line O Steep Slope 50ft Buffer Major Elevation Grid cartographic purposes only. Renton C-16 Al Structure Type (See Appx. A) Construction Scenario — — — Underground Phone/TV Utility Line — — — Underground Power Utility Line Erosion Hazard _ _ Major Station Grid Note:Note: Underground utility lines are surveyed in the vicinity of poles only. Existing Lake Tradition poles aren't represented by new conductors because they are an L d �. �� Page 5 Of 30 R-414 006 Key (See Appx. B) Unknown Underground Utility Line Minor Station Grid existing line, and are being represented due to the poles Date: Dec 2020 being replaced. ^' v a W 0 V) H fn Q W I W N_ 0 W W Z W 00 H W W 2 fn MProject Corridor 0 Proposed Pole Location Existing Pole Location - To Be Removed Transmission Line - Proposed Transmission Line - Existing 517 Proposed Pole Number C-16 Structure Type (see Appx. A) Al Construction Scenario Key (See Appx. B) - Potential Stringing Site Recommended Access- Proposed Pole Olympic Underground Pipline (Approx. Location) - • Wastewater Utility Line - • Water Utility Line Underground Gas Utility Line - - - Underground Phone/TV Utility Line - - - Underground Power Utility Line - - Unknown Underground Utility Line ^M^- Stream Wetland OWetland or Stream Buffer Landslide Hazard Landslide Hazard 50ft Buffer ® Steep Slope Steep Slope 50ft Buffer Erosion Hazard Parcel L - City Jurisdiction Boundary Profile View Structure Conductor Ground Line Major Elevation Grid - - - Major Station Grid - Minor Station Grid ® 0 25 50 I I I Feet 1 inch = 50 feet SOURCES: Roads and Parcels - King County (2015), Aerial - King County (2015); Streams, Wetlands and Buffers, Landslide Hazard and Buffers, and Steep Slopes and Buffers from Watershed Company (2017). For cartographic purposes only Note: Note: Underground utility lines are surveyed in the vicinity of poles only. Existing Lake Tradition poles aren't represented by new conductors because they are an existing line, and are being represented due to the poles being replaced. MAP EXTENT Newcastle—j I d Renton SITE PLAN BASED ON PSE ENGINEERING DESIGN REVISION N R-414007 Page 6 of 30 Date: Dec 2020 if, w w x to w Z J x U Q 0 0 0 W W 0 V) I- U) Q W WI N U W W z W •z W W U) N'r ?PROTECT WATER MAIN II DURING POLE REMOVAL '�' L) a h 3/4z C-1 Al , , �. •.\\�� 600 580 1 3/4 - I 560 1 SCD E60 Sao i 105FT I 520 i STA=176+67.86 500 1 HT=91 FT ELE=397.38 480 I I 460 1 =----L-440 � I-420 400 380 �'l 60 1 '- 340 1 -4 I ao + 1 1+ 320 I c I c 300 I I 600 580 560 540 520 500 480 460 440 420 .-- I - 380 360 340 320 MProject Corridor - Potential Stringing Site — Stream Parcel MAP EXTENT SITE PLAN 0 Proposed Pole Location Recommended Access- Proposed Pole Wetland i---, L - City Jurisdiction Boundary 0 I 25 I I 50 Feet 0 Newcastle Existing Pole Location- Olympic Underground O Wetland or Stream Buffer Profile View 1 inch = 50 feet =1 1101 .�� • To Be Removed Pipline (Approx. Location) Landslide Hazard � Structure g Y SOURCES: Roads and Parcels - Kin Count 2015 Aerial ( ), Transmission Line Proposed ---' Wastewater Utility Line Landslide Hazard 50ft Buffer Conductor King County (2015); Streams, Wetlands and Buffers, Landslide Hazard and Buffers, and Steep Slopes and BASED ON PSE ENGINEERING Transmission Line Existing Water Utility Line ® Steep Slope Ground Line Buffers from Watershed Company (2017). DESIGN REVISION N 517 Proposed Pole Number p Underground Gas Utility Line � Steep Slope 50ft Buffer Major Elevation Grid For cartographic purposes only. Renton C-16 Structure Type (see Appx. A) Construction Scenario - - - Underground Phone/TV Utility Line - - - Underground Power Utility Line Erosion Hazard _ _ 'Major Station Grid Note:Note: Underground utility lines are surveyed in the vicinity of poles only. Existing Lake Tradition poles aren't ;f ~e R-414 0 0 8 Page 7 Of 30 Al Key (SeeAppx. B) Minor Station Grid represented by new conductors because they are an existing line, and are being represented due to the �� - - Unknown Underground Utility Line poles ^' t Date: Dec 2020 being replaced. to Q 0 0 LLI LLI 0 U) Q LU I LU N_ U W Z W O H W W 2 U) 600 580 560 540 520 500 480 460 440 420 400 sw 360 340 320 300 Project Corridor Q Potential Stringing Site ^^r^- Stream Parcel MAP EXTENT SITE PLAN O Proposed Pole Location Recommended Access- Proposed Pole � Wetland L _ City Jurisdiction Boundary a z5 5a I I I Feet � (Newcastle Existing Pole Location- Olympic Underground O Wetland or Stream Buffer Profile View 1 inch = 50 feet • .�� • To Be Removed Pipline (Approx. Location) Landslide Hazard Structure SOURCES: Roads and Parcels - King County (2015), Aerial Transmission Line- Proposed Wastewater Utility Line Landslide Hazard 50ft Buffer Conductor -King County (2015); Streams, Wetlands and Buffers, Landslide Hazard and Buffers, and Steep Slopes and d BASED ON PSE ENGINEERING Transmission Line - Existing Water Utility Line ® Steep Slope Ground Line Buffers from Watershed Company (2017). For DESIGN REVISION N 517 Proposed Pole Number p Underground Gas Utility Line � Steep Slope 50ft Buffer Major Elevation Grid cartographic purposes only. Renton C-16 Al Structure Type (See Appx. A) Construction Scenario — — — Underground Phone/TV Utility Line — — — Underground Power Utility Line Erosion Hazard — — — Major Station Grid Note:Note: Underground utility lines are surveyed in the vicinity of poles only. Existing Lake Tradition poles aren't represented b new conductors because the are an y y L d �. - Page 8 of 30 R-414009 Key (See A x. B pp ) Unknown Underground Utility Line Minor Station Grid existing line, and are being represented due to the poles + Date: Dec 2020 being replaced. ^^ 0 IT 0 0 LU W 0 V) I— to Q W I W N_ (D IX W Z W H I LU W 2 U) 600 I I 580 I 3/1 560 I DCT2 540 125FT 520 STA=161+67.96 500 i HT=109FT ELE=383.42 480 460 1 458 I �—"- 440 i i 42 400 i 360 ' I ' 340 I c 320 c PROTECT WATER MAIN AND HYDRANT IN PLACE DURING POLE REMOVAL 564 t i 600 580 560 540 520 500 480 46 '0 420 400 360 340 320 M Project Corridor Q Potential Stringing Site ^^r^- Stream Parcel e) 1 5MAPE XTENT SITE PLAN 0 Proposed Pole Location Recommended Access- Proposed Pole � Wetland L _ j City Jurisdiction Boundary I 2 I5 IOFeet I l Ne w c a stle .�� Existing Pole Location- Olympic Underground O Wetland or Stream Buffer Profile View 1 inch = 50 feet • • To Be Removed Pipline (Approx. Location) Landslide Hazard Structure SOURCES: Roads and Parcels - King County (2015), Aerial Transmission Line - Proposed Wastewater Utility Line King County (2015); Streams, Wetlands and Buffers, d BASED ON PSE ENGINEERING Landslide Hazard 50ft Buffer Conductor Landslide Hazard and Buffers, and Steep Slopes and Transmission Line - Existing Water Utility Line Buffers from Watershed Company (2017). DESIGN REVISION N ® Steep Slope Ground Line 517 Proposed Pole Number Underground Gas Utility Line For cartographic purposes only. Renton p O Steep Slope 50ft Buffer Major Elevation Grid C-16 Structure Type (See Appx. A) - - - Underground Phone/TV Utility Line _ _ Note:Note: Underground utility lines are surveyed in the d Erosion Hazard 'Major Station Grid vicinity of poles only. Existing Lake Tradition poles aren't R-414 0 1 0 Page 9 of 30 Al Construction Scenario - - - Underground Power Utility Line represented by new conductors because they are an E Key (See Appx. B) Unknown Underground Utility Line Minor Station Grid existing line, and are being represented due to the poles Date: Dec 2020 being replaced. ^^ 00 H LU LU x 0) W Z J x U a CD 0 W W 0 V) H fn Q W I W N_ 0 W W Z W V H W W 2 fn MProject Corridor 0 Proposed Pole Location Existing Pole Location - To Be Removed Transmission Line - Proposed Transmission Line - Existing 517 Proposed Pole Number C-16 Structure Type (See Appx. A) Al Construction Scenario Key (See Appx. B) - Potential Stringing Site Recommended Access- Proposed Pole Olympic Underground Pipline (Approx. Location) - • Wastewater Utility Line - • Water Utility Line Underground Gas Utility Line - - - Underground Phone/TV Utility Line - - - Underground Power Utility Line - - Unknown Underground Utility Line ^M^- Stream Wetland OWetland or Stream Buffer Landslide Hazard Landslide Hazard 50ft Buffer ® Steep Slope Steep Slope 50ft Buffer Erosion Hazard Parcel L - City Jurisdiction Boundary Profile View Structure Conductor Ground Line Major Elevation Grid - - - Major Station Grid - Minor Station Grid 0 0 25 50 1 I I Feet 1 inch = 50 feet SOURCES: Roads and Parcels - King County (2015), Aerial - King County (2015); Streams, Wetlands and Buffers, Landslide Hazard and Buffers, and Steep Slopes and Buffers from Watershed Company (2017). For cartographic purposes only. Note: Note: Underground utility lines are surveyed in the vicinity of poles only. Existing Lake Tradition poles aren't represented by new conductors because they are an existing line, and are being represented due to the poles being replaced. MAP EXTENT Newcastle d Renton SITE PLAN BASED ON PSE ENGINEERING DESIGN REVISION N R-414011 Page 10 of 30 Date: Dec 2020 H LU LU x 0) w Z J x U Q W 0 U) Q W I W N_ 0 W W Z W M W W 2 fn M Project Corridor - Potential Stringing Site OProposed Pole Location Recommended Access- Proposed Pole Existing Pole Location— Olympic Underground +� To Be Removed Pipline (Approx. Location) Transmission Line - Proposed — — —' Wastewater Utility Line Transmission Line - Existing ---' Water Utility Line 517 Proposed Pole Number Underground Gas Utility Line C-16 Structure Type (SeeAppx. A) - - - Underground Phone/TV Utility Line Al Construction Scenario - - - Underground Power Utility Line Key (SeeAppx. B) - - Unknown Underground Utility Line ^M^- Stream Wetland OWetland or Stream Buffer Landslide Hazard Landslide Hazard 50ft Buffer ® Steep Slope Steep Slope 50ft Buffer Erosion Hazard Parcel L - City Jurisdiction Boundary Profile View Structure Conductor Ground Line Major Elevation Grid - - - Major Station Grid - Minor Station Grid 0 0 25 50 1 I I Feet 1 inch = 50 feet SOURCES: Roads and Parcels - King County (2015), Aerial - King County (2015); Streams, Wetlands and Buffers, Landslide Hazard and Buffers, and Steep Slopes and Buffers from Watershed Company (2017). For cartographic purposes only. Note: Note: Underground utility lines are surveyed in the vicinity of poles only. Existing Lake Tradition poles aren't represented by new conductors because they are an existing line, and are being represented due to the poles being replaced. MAP EXTENT Newcastlb-.--� d Renton � d SITE PLAN BASED ON PSE ENGINEERING DESIGN REVISION N R-414012 Page 11 of 30 Date: Dec 2020 0 T W w x to LU Z J x U Q LLI 0 U) Q LU I LU N_ U W Z W 1-- LU W 2 U) Project Corridor O Proposed Pole Location Existing Pole Location - To Be Removed Transmission Line - Proposed Transmission Line - Existing 517 Proposed Pole Number C-16 Structure Type (See Appx. A) Al Construction Scenario Key (SeeAppx. B) Q Potential Stringing Site Recommended Access- Proposed Pole Olympic Underground Pipline (Approx. Location) Wastewater Utility Line - • Water Utility Line Underground Gas Utility Line - - - Underground Phone/TV Utility Line - - - Underground Power Utility Line Unknown Underground Utility Line -^ - Stream Wetland OWetland or Stream Buffer Landslide Hazard Landslide Hazard 50ft Buffer ® Steep Slope Steep Slope 50ft Buffer Erosion Hazard Parcel L _ j City Jurisdiction Boundary Profile View Structure Conductor Ground Line Major Elevation Grid - - - Major Station Grid Minor Station Grid 0 25 50 I I I Feet 1 inch = 50 feet SOURCES: Roads and Parcels - King County (2015), Aerial - King County (2015); Streams, Wetlands and Buffers, Landslide Hazard and Buffers, and Steep Slopes and Buffers from Watershed Company (2017). For cartographic purposes only Note:Note: Underground utility lines are surveyed in the vicinity of poles only. Existing Lake Tradition poles aren't represented by new conductors because they are an existing line, and are being represented due to the poles being replaced. MAP EXTENT Newcastle d Renton d SITE PLAN BASED ON PSE ENGINEERING DESIGN REVISION N R-414013 Page 12 of 30 Date: Dec 2020 T T W W ISI^ V! W Z J 2 0 a O It LW r W 0 V) H fn Q W I W N_ 0 W W Z W r H W W 2 fn MProject Corridor 0 Proposed Pole Location Existing Pole Location - To Be Removed Transmission Line - Proposed Transmission Line - Existing 517 Proposed Pole Number C-16 Structure Type (see Appx. A) Al Construction Scenario Key (See Appx. B) - Potential Stringing Site Recommended Access- Proposed Pole Olympic Underground Pipline (Approx. Location) - • Wastewater Utility Line - • Water Utility Line Underground Gas Utility Line - - - Underground Phone/TV Utility Line - - - Underground Power Utility Line - - Unknown Underground Utility Line ^M^- Stream Wetland OWetland or Stream Buffer Landslide Hazard Landslide Hazard 50ft Buffer ® Steep Slope Steep Slope 50ft Buffer Erosion Hazard Parcel L - City Jurisdiction Boundary Profile View Structure Conductor Ground Line Major Elevation Grid - - - Major Station Grid - Minor Station Grid 0 0 25 50 1 I I Feet 1 inch = 50 feet SOURCES: Roads and Parcels - King County (2015), Aerial - King County (2015); Streams, Wetlands and Buffers, Landslide Hazard and Buffers, and Steep Slopes and Buffers from Watershed Company (2017). For cartographic purposes only. Note: Note: Underground utility lines are surveyed in the vicinity of poles only. Existing Lake Tradition poles aren't represented by new conductors because they are an existing line, and are being represented due to the poles being replaced. MAP EXTENT Newcastle d Z Renton SITE PLAN BASED ON PSE ENGINEERING DESIGN REVISION N R-414014 Page 13 of 30 Date: Dec 2020 N T W W 12IA V) W Z J 2 U Q o .-V* U) Q LU W N_ U W Z W � we H W W 2 U) �' • �_ �;� .•;ram' .�,'s4''t y�� n 2/4 DCA15 085FT STA=122+86.01 HT=85FT ELE=378.32 i 594 I T I CID CDf �i N r ■ s 560 540 520 500 480 1 1 460 440 20 400 380 340 320 i 300 280 MProject Corridor Q Potential Stringing Site ^^r^- Stream Parcel 0 0 5MAPEXTENT 0 Proposed Pole Location Recommended Access- Proposed Pole � Wetland L _ j City Jurisdiction Boundary I 2 I5 IOFeet I l Ne we a stld-7) .�� Existing Pole Location- Olympic Underground O Wetland or Stream Buffer Profile View 1 inch = 50 feet • To Be Removed Pipline (Approx. Location) Landslide Hazard Structure SOURCES: Roads and Parcels - King County (2015), Aerial Transmission Line - Proposed Wastewater Utility Line King County (2015); Streams, Wetlands and Buffers, d Landslide Hazard 50ft Buffer Conductor Landslide Hazard and Buffers, and Steep Slopes and Transmission Line - Existing ---' Water Utility Line Buffers from Watershed Company (2017). ■.r& ® Steep Slope Ground Line 517 Proposed Pole Number Underground Gas Utility Line For cartographic purposes only. Renton p O Steep Slope 50ft Buffer Major Elevation Grid C-16 Structure Type (See Appx. A) — — — Underground Phone/TV Utility Line Note:Note: Underground utility lines are surveyed in the — — d Erosion Hazard — Major Station Grid vicinity of poles only. Existing Lake Tradition poles aren't Al Construction Scenario — — — Underground Power Utility Line represented by new conductors because they are an ' Key (See Appx. B) Unknown Underground Utility Line Minor Station Grid existing line, and are being represented due to the poles being replaced. ^^ SITE PLAN BASED ON PSE ENGINEERING DESIGN REVISION N R-414015 Page 14 of 30 Date: Dec 2020 a 0 CD 0 W H W 0 V) U) Q W WI N U X W Z W I H W W 2 fn Im L 't _. , . •i _ • _ , .. ,' .alb iito r y 27800500 y utltlli}!i!t HYDRANT IN PLACE DURING POLE REMOVAL 1 i jM � (3)M 1( M - 213 C-1 Al 1 i • 1 I 560 540 I 2/3 520 500 DCT2 480 i 11 OFT ' 460 STA=116+81.81 "- 440 I HT=95FT ELE=341.54 420 652 I i 594 400 � 1 I � = 38 n— 360 340 320 300 I+ to +I of 280 I 0 o l Project Corridor - Potential Stringing Site — Stream Parcel MAP EXTENT SITE PLAN 0 Proposed Pole Location Recommended Access- Proposed Pole = Wetland L j City Jurisdiction Boundary ® 215 IDFeet ( Ne we a stl� .�� Existing Pole Location- Olympic Underground O Wetland or Stream Buffer _ Profile View 1 inch = 50 feet • • To Be Removed Pipline (Approx. Location) Landslide Hazard Structure SOURCES: Roads and Parcels -Kin Count 2015 Aerial g y ( ), + Transmission Line Proposed ---' Wastewater Utility Line Landslide Hazard 50ft Buffer Conductor King County (2015); Streams, Wetlands and Buffers, Landslide Hazard and Buffers, and Steep Slopes and d 4 w BASED ON PSE ENGINEERING - Transmission Line - Existing ---' Water Utility Line ® Steep Slope Ground Line Buffers from Watershed Company (2017). For �� DESIGN REVISION N 517 Proposed Pole Number p Underground Gas Utility Line � Steep Slope 50ft Buffer Major Elevation Grid cartographic purposes only. Renton C-16 Structure Type (SeeAppx. A) — — — Underground Phone/TV Utility Line — — — Erosion Hazard — — — Major Station Grid Note:Note: Underground utility lines are surveyed in the vicinity of poles only. Existing Lake Tradition poles aren't _ U R-414016 Page 15 Of 30 Al Construction Scenario Underground Power Utility Line - Minor Station Grid represented by new conductors because they are an ' Key (SeeAppx. a) — — Unknown Underground Utility Line existing line, and are being represented due to the poles _ Date: Dec 2020 being replaced. ^' v H LU LU x to LU Z J x U a 0 0 LLI LLI 0 U) Q LU I LU N_ U W Z W 00 IL- LU W 2 U) Project Corridor 0 Proposed Pole Location Existing Pole Location - To Be Removed Transmission Line - Proposed Transmission Line - Existing 517 Proposed Pole Number C-16 Structure Type (See Appx. A) Al Construction Scenario Key (SeeAppx. B) Q Potential Stringing Site Recommended Access- Proposed Pole Olympic Underground Pipline (Approx. Location) Wastewater Utility Line - • Water Utility Line Underground Gas Utility Line - - - Underground Phone/TV Utility Line - - - Underground Power Utility Line Unknown Underground Utility Line -^ - Stream Wetland OWetland or Stream Buffer Landslide Hazard Landslide Hazard 50ft Buffer ® Steep Slope O Steep Slope 50ft Buffer Erosion Hazard Parcel L _ j City Jurisdiction Boundary Profile View Structure Conductor Ground Line Major Elevation Grid - - - Major Station Grid Minor Station Grid ® 0 25 5 I 0 I I Feet 1 inch = 50 feet SOURCES: Roads and Parcels - King County (2015), Aerial - King County (2015); Streams, Wetlands and Buffers, Landslide Hazard and Buffers, and Steep Slopes and Buffers from Watershed Company (2017). For cartographic purposes only Note:Note: Underground utility lines are surveyed in the vicinity of poles only. Existing Lake Tradition poles aren't represented by new conductors because they are an existing line, and are being represented due to the poles being replaced. MAP EXTENT (� N e w c a stl&---, Renton d SITE PLAN BASED ON PSE ENGINEERING DESIGN REVISION N R-414017 Page 16 of 30 Date: Dec 2020 H LU LU x LU Z J x 0 a CD O W I— W 0 I— fn Q W WI N 0 W W Z W .z I— W W to 540 520 500 480 460 440 420 400 ' 360 - 340 300 280 260 •f, �1 r NIL . �� is `• = ' '�' a - .At 1/7 Al - T K - a f'. '' • 1y.4 1/7 DCT2D 105FT STA=100+3.83 HT=91 FT ELE=331.93 755 1 MProject Corridor - Potential Stringing Site — Stream Parcel MAP EXTENT SITE PLAN 0 Proposed Pole Location Recommended Access- Proposed Pole Wetland L _ j City Jurisdiction Boundary 215 IOFeet Q (INe a stl Existing Pole Location- Olympic Underground O Wetland or Stream Buffer Profile View 1 inch = 50 feet • .�� • To Be Removed Pipline (Approx. Location) Landslide Hazard Structure SOURCES: Roads and Parcels -Kin Count 2015 Aerial g y ( ), Transmission Line - Proposed ---' Wastewater Utility Line Landslide Hazard 50ft Buffer Conductor - King County (2015); Streams, Wetlands and Buffers, Landslide Hazard and Buffers, and Steep Slopes and d BASED ON PSE ENGINEERING Transmission Line Existing ---' Water Utility Line ® Steep Slope Ground Line Buffers from Watershed Company (2017). DESIGN REVISION N 517 Proposed Pole Number p Underground Gas Utility Line � Steep Slope 50ft Buffer Major Elevation Grid For cartographic purposes only. Renton C-16 Structure Type (see Appx. A) — — — Underground Phone/TV Utility Line — — — Erosion Hazard — — — Major Station Grid Note:Note: Underground utility lines are surveyed in the vicinity of poles only. Existing Lake Tradition poles aren't a 17 of 30 R-414018 Page Al Construction Scenario Underground Power Utility Line represented by new conductors because they are an 4 - Key (see Appx. B) — — Unknown Underground Utility Line - Minor Station Grid existing line, and are being represented due to the poles Date: Dec 2020 being replaced. ^^ W W 2 N W Z J 2 U CQ L CD CD LW r W 0 U) Q W WI N U W W z W 0 NI W W _ U) 1 1 ri;4 •i�ii i ram.;._`' �� °. 116 7: Ile ` C-1 ..�...� � -,; �� .._ -� _ Al � --_- i. � — - _._� ._..� �..:_- •.�5 _ �-�:: <"o; 1 E �.... - - •'� w - 1 1• IV ou lip- w :c- 0 540 a 1 1 540 520 � 1/6 520 a 500 I DCT2 I 500 480 i 105FT i 480 w 460 i STA=93+31.08 i 460 440 i HT=91 FT ELE=337.03 aao 420 I I t 420 w 400 I I I 58 I 673 400 y 380 380 �! 360 s` 340 I I 340 q 320 I � I 320 L I I 300 v m o L_ 280 I o I + 280 260 I o I 260 Project Corridor - Potential Stringing Site ^ti'^' Stream Parcel MAP EXTENT SITE PLAN 0 Proposed Pole Location Recommended Access- Proposed Pole Wetland City Jurisdiction Boundary Q 0 25 50 I I I � (Newcastle Existing Pole Location- Olympic Underground O Wetland or Stream Buffer L _ Profile View Feet 1 inch = 50 feet • .�� • To Be Removed Pipline (Approx. Location) Landslide Hazard Structure SOURCES: Roads and Parcels -King Count 2015 Aerial y ( ), Transmission Line - Proposed ---' Wastewater Utility Line Landslide Hazard 50ft Buffer Conductor - King County (2015); Streams, Wetlands and Buffers, Landslide Hazard and Buffers, and Steep Slopes and d BASED ON PSE ENGINEERING Transmission Line -Existing ---' Water Utility Line ® Steep Slope Ground Line Buffers from Watershed Company (2017). DESIGN REVISION N 517 Proposed Pole Number p Underground Gas Utility Line � Steep Slope 50ft Buffer Major Elevation Grid For cartographic purposes only. Renton C-16 Structure Type (SeeAppx. A) — — — Underground Phone/TV Utility Line — — — Erosion Hazard — — — Major Station Grid Note:Note: Underground utility lines are surveyed in the vicinity of poles only. Existing Lake Tradition poles aren't L _ U R-414019 Page 18 Of 30 Al Construction Scenario Underground Power Utility Line represented by new conductors because they are an - Key (SeeAppx. B) — — Unknown Underground Utility Line - Minor Station Grid existing line, and are being represented due to the poles Date: Dec 2020 being replaced. ^^ a 0 0 LLI LLI 0 U) Q LU I LU N_ U W Z W N IL— LU W 2 U) Project Corridor Q Potential Stringing Site ^^r^- Stream Parcel MAP EXTENT Proposed Pole Location Recommended Access- Proposed Pole � Wetland i--- City Jurisdiction Boundary 0 0 25 I I 5I Q Newcastle L - Feet Existing Pole Location- Olympic Underground O Wetland or Stream Buffer Profile View 1 inch = 50 feet .�� • To Be Removed Pipline (Approx. Location) Landslide Hazard Structure SOURCES: Roads and Parcels -King County (2015), Aerial Transmission Line - Proposed Wastewater Utility Line Landslide Hazard 50ft Buffer Conductor King County (2015); Streams, Wetlands and Buffers, Landslide Hazard and Buffers, and Steep Slopes and d Transmission Line - Existing ---' Water Utility Line ® Steep Slope Ground Line Buffers from Watershed Company (2017). For 517 Proposed Pole Number p Underground Gas Utility Line O Steep Slope 50ft Buffer Major Elevation Grid cartographic purposes only. RentoI1 C-16 Structure Type (See Appx. A) — — — Underground Phone/TV Utility Line Erosion Hazard — — — Major Station Grid Note:Note: Underground utility lines are surveyed in the vicinity of poles only. Existing Lake Tradition poles aren't . � 1� Al Construction Scenario — — — Underground Power Utility Line represented by new conductors because they are an `.� 4 - Key (See Appx. B) Unknown Underground Utility Line Minor Station Grid existing line, and are being represented due to the poles being replaced. ^^ SITE PLAN BASED ON PSE ENGINEERING DESIGN REVISION N R-414020 Page 19 of 30 Date: Dec 2020 00 H w w x W Z J x U a o � F CDu V W u W 0 Y) Q W WI N 0 W w Z W , F III 4t4� 460 440 420 400 380 360 32—i 320 ' 300 280 260 240 220 200 180 114 _- C-1 _ Al fi O �. _ Yr+�'�"s""q "� cc+yti-ti'[ TT'-:, •.. j fir,, r -- ;- .�,--,.� i 1/3 DCT2D 085FT STA=76+58.13 HT=73FT ELE=306.00 I I 515 Iv 0 o + 1/4 DCT2-, 130FT STA=81 +73.15 HT=113FT ELE=259.19 MProject Corridor - Potential Stringing Site ^^r^- Stream Parcel MAP EXTENT SITE PLAN 0 Proposed Pole Location Recommended Access- Proposed Pole Wetland L j City Jurisdiction Boundary 215 IC Q < Ne we a stl _ Feet < Existing Pole Location- Olympic Underground O Wetland or Stream Buffer Profile View 1 inch = 50 feet J • .�� • To Be Removed Pipline (Approx. Location) Landslide Hazard Structure SOURCES: Roads and Parcels -Kin Count 2015 Aerial g y ( ), Transmission Line - Proposed ---' Wastewater Utility Line Landslide Hazard 50ft Buffer Conductor - King County (2015); Streams, Wetlands and Buffers, Landslide Hazard and Buffers, and Steep Slopes and d BASED ON PSE ENGINEERING Transmission Line Existing ---' Water Utility Line ® Steep Slope Ground Line Buffers from Watershed Company (2017). DESIGN REVISION N 517 Proposed Pole Number p Underground Gas Utility Line � Steep Slope 50ft Buffer Major Elevation Grid For cartographic purposes only. Renton C-16 Structure Type (see Appx. A) Construction Scenario - - - Underground Phone/TV Utility Line - - - Underground Power Utility Line Erosion Hazard - - - Major Station Grid Note:Note: Underground utility lines are surveyed in the vicinity of poles only. Existing Lake Tradition poles aren't N_ d R-414021 Page 20 of 30 Al represented by new conductors because they are an Key (SeeAppx. B) - - Unknown Underground Utility Line - Minor Station Grid existing line, and are being represented due to the poles Date: Dec 2020 being replaced. ^^ rn H w w IxIA V! w Z J x U Q CD O W 11-1 0 V) H U) Q W WI N U W W Z W M NI w W U) 4307300380 4307300390 07301260 Q- j` 4307300400 kWh 41:- s:. :-fir �.._...`.ti--t:.-- 4307301220pp— .�,, ��;`` • � .�� ._�� Ab r t art . 4307320300 F• 280 •� •_ � 4307320310 I 520 I 1/2 500 480 SCDE60 460 EAST 070FT/WEST 070FT 440 STA=71 +9.79 420 HT=70FT ELE=334.50 aoo 410 I 380 I 548 360 340 320 I — Io 300 o0 280 260 • 4 N 240 c o Project Corridor - Potential Stringing Site ^ti ^' Stream Parcel MAP EXTENT SITE PLAN 0 Proposed Pole Location Recommended Access- Proposed Pole Wetland L _ City Jurisdiction Boundary 0 25 50 ® I I I Feet -J Newcastle Existing Pole Location- Olympic Underground O Wetland or Stream Buffer Profile View 1 inch = 50 feet �" •10 .�� • To Be Removed Pipline (Approx. Location) Landslide Hazard Structure SOURCES: Roads and Parcels -Kin9 Count 2015 Aerial y ( ), Transmission Line - Proposed ---' Wastewater Utility Line Landslide Hazard 50ft Buffer Conductor King County (2015); Streams, Wetlands and Buffers, Landslide Hazard and Buffers, and Steep Slopes and d BASED ON PSE ENGINEERING Transmission Line -Existing ---' Water Utility Line ® Steep Slope Ground Line Buffers from Watershed Company (2017). DESIGN REVISION N 517 Proposed Pole Number p Underground Gas Utility Line Steep Slope 50ft Buffer Major Elevation Grid For cartographic purposes only. Renton C-16 Structure Type (seeAppx. A) — — — Underground Phone/TV Utility Line — — — rosazar Erosion Hazard — — ' Major Station Grid Note: Note: Underground utility lines are surveyed in the vicinity of poles only. Existing Lake Tradition poles aren't � - U - Pa a 21 of 30 R-414022 g Al Construction Scenario Underground Power Utility Line represented by new conductors because they are an Key (see Appx. B) — — Unknown Underground Utility Line Minor Station Grid existing line, and are being represented due to the poles Date: Dec 2020 being replaced. Q 1 p. s r �' 'A �i r i " s r •• r r �! rr rr�� d`r '�g:,yr`rsJ F.��:: 't r.,..rrre•rr r .k.. � :r y r.. ��r ' r•' r' ' .i �. 7 .. r ♦ �� + r%r i r r' � �."';�k'y :�,r �r=' '43r(�•730�R �•J U�L� r. NAM �,� YJ FJ�� t .A ~•^•i � JrJrJr �• rrr rr ^ yr r!'r?a �• s . ��: n�� . ••RUM J,J- � . / .+�: a•••J J? `r rf. :-'"=A i��r!-:Y,�r�' ! rrr �r Y�'Rr i[. s. 'Y.: ., J .x�'r •' J �J �J/+ y /'+ `J�•� >� Jr F ..,I - �, a r, ?i`.(•. ��• ice-'' .. �;rr r. •'r• r' �, ,.'ter '+ '.Ery��.�,'. ,.rr rr ;�i -VID rr r• r r. �� .. r r��. .r. . K ` f r `.r s��.a��-��.��.5:si.� i:36i.,•'wb. , R IN djIVA01 rr• r xr � rrr '` �. iS: `' .•. i - ,1 - i� • ,,r Vli' max; �n 1� �_`. �� ._�� _. }s A f y 4307320320 R •' . rrr L, • 1 4307320340 r RENTON O r d• N W l O W C15LN _ :';ti• • W W t H IV Z s: r _ J _ 2 .ti U _ a y W :•:s ' .S:r. •k- - MW W -WAMA F: !y A ',.- � . r River ND z. - - Cedar N :... - - - Shoreline - - �T e S — �•; 's. YP y. 5:• • n. ,�,. - - ':k`•�' - � _- �' .�. _. sSt1.' y - ... .. .. .. .. _ - ... .. .. .. _ .__ .--�t... .-,... _ 1 .. Ll\ `.l :fir :, W - - ■ ��13C :►.'i��!"�ii� �L'Sri��Y•-.. �•�r-1;IM:7PV Mq-• _i: i F..0•.qAi.'Ke'".-.:°.'.'.J6"'7[A'-}Z.i;7. .'V YT 4,. 4 03"4 A1�jiW •::it::. �=:_..::• :�::..:..:: :. ... ' :_.. _:.'•:_::-:::;::�- _;.:.:..;�.......'::: ::.•.::. � •-� �s _�::::::...� ..._,.-:..:•••..�.`..#��•�•S•}::�•Y•7Ri�1k•.� ti1r"�,. �� .1�► r \ ►IL \MX 'k�� _ t I if E •'t - 'jiSi-.,� Via'%c! �':•.:��'- - w 7 - ;Yo '4y U - _ •'f: l ice•:' _ _ 1 _ r _ _ w - - = Y.r N /. a N Lei k ' ]` ' :i-: - • -Y. f' a.: 3 _ W •F� ' 1. _ - '•�•?•:'r., ..•:': ae'�.. _ •R w� w o° �i •i � '..ham '•-y. — 320 1,524 T —T I 280 w I ------------ I 260 w I I 240 220 200 w I + I 180 to T I T 160 140 120 100 80 60 i a I I 40 Project Corridor - Potential Stringing Site Stream Parcel MAP EXTENT ® 0 25 5l1 SITE PLAN Proposed Pole Location � Recommended Access- Proposed Pole � Wetland L� City Jurisdiction Boundary I I I Feet Newcastle .�� Existing Pole Location- Olympic Underground O Wetland or Stream Buffer Profile View 1 inch = 50 feet =1 0 1 lie] • To Be Removed Pipline (Approx. Location) SOURCES: Roads and Parcels - Kin 2015 Aerial Landslide Hazard Structure g Count y ( ) Transmission Line Proposed ---• Wastewater Utility Line King County (2015); Streams, Wetlands and Buffers, d BASED ON PSE ENGINEERING Landslide Hazard 50ft Buffer Conductor Landslide Hazard and Buffers, and Steep Slopes and Transmission Line - Existing Water Utility Line Buffers from Watershed Company (2017). DESIGN REVISION N ® Steep Slope Ground Line 517 Proposed Pole Number Underground Gas Utility Line For cartographic purposes only. Renton p � Steep Slope 50ft Buffer Major Elevation Grid C-16 Structure Type (SeeAppx. A) - - - Underground Phone/TV Utility Line _ _ Note:Note: Underground utility lines are surveyed in the - U R-414024 g Erosion Hazard - Major Station Grid vicinity of poles only. Existing Lake Tradition poles aren't Pa a 23 of 30 Al Construction Scenario - - - Underground Power Utility Line represented by new conductors because they are an Key (see Appx. B) - - Unknown Underground Utility Line - Minor Station Grid existing line, and are being represented due to the poles f Date: Dec 2020 being replaced. ^^ N N H W W 2 W Z J 2 U Q F r.- f .•- r � .•- �. .- r! rr- rr `. +- Js - Jr ! � r• /+ ■•'f - ..• r ..' rr � r- +-' /' - r' =- �„^" �•'-Jr■' f -x r.: �? y r r fJ • rr Jr•-r/,, r- / /r'r •`^•✓••I • Jrr■+ rr 'rr ,. r' J rr Is .{,''� rr■I' Ir f`r �Jr 'r/r .r '` r•' rrx■y /•• .r. ��J■•". r'� 33�� v r JI J,n+' r Jy •• y !� � �• J r• ■•'. •r. `` J ,!✓ r y+' yI .• y•" .- J■'r r r r < < Fr J ✓J yr r I'� •' r rr r ■ J' y' � J /r .� ^ '�'.v ' r�• ✓ .. r•r iv;'.'- r ✓" ■ jy r' •'- rr r- r I•r r' r' rI f _ r . 1 �. r3• ✓! r r. .yy t,. ■ J•, y■y ■ ��} -✓ Jr ■ IJ �■ J! r J n.IT ✓, F !' !? �, ! y •• r /'•_ r ■` J � ••. ■ •e� ■ .� , •� ✓ �• - rr ■J y +•' r ,. r r Y •.'f • J IJ I•' r% + r 1J Fr r,J rr /r + / yJ ! J J : r � � � +' r' i- .- J- •-r... Jr1rI JJr✓r✓' _ -■`.r_'1 +r' !r IIf ��PPP ..�.��A r yI I!'''r, 1 � J+r J'` J1 r'y J,. `,r J yY r+S, r'r,• ✓ J/,,' yr,'■ r �i' �■.•' J.J ,r. J JJr!■. yF+r �Jf,. ;r' f�J J �J■r�J y Jar• J�r ,r✓ r yTr,.'` r. yr•'�r■�!I N✓J ✓=•!` % �� -yy /rJr, r,' ??'Y'.•r...' `-r' .J',i 1)!j/ r■, pi ' I d A• t� -' ✓ / • J J •'r J� r + r A .■ /■ r' •• J'•' -: F'• RAJ J �• r •!��" .' r ` J rr J r •' rr +. ■ / '' JA `f Jr � r Ia J ! ■rr - / ! J I. :rr ' J � r ■r. ..' ■ ,,. ✓'v %! ■ 'l `' -• ,_J J JJ r ! J .■ .. r .• r .'• ■•'' JJ Jrr J.n +- r J, yrr J r- yr r I•JJ•✓N ^rtJ•✓✓ J r JI '+✓� ■rJJr yJJ Fr■+.J ■ .•r ry• J�r Jr•/r yr J■J f+■'• rI fy y/• rI- r'J IJrIf rrl ..•! '. JJJx- ! ✓ 'J..I•• ■• r r/ J= r 1.+r ■ r �,J r y'� y !`` J ■ ✓/ ■ '. Jr sr •. r r f•r• . y ✓` +' r •''✓ 1. -. I r,r + rr �, ' I yy s/•• ! JJtb`23B59UJI8' ✓• ' `Jy •/ F .+` r■J'• rr'r ■J !,.! t _ • ✓ r F �•• .+ r ..•J, Y ■-1 ! ✓r �■ yam••• J .•■ II !' '• .rrJ rr �I•r Jr +r• ✓.• •• / .• ! r ! ■ •-■v✓ ! � y r ,. I Ff I /r r ! fI J ry I .r 1 � � � i�. •y J ■ x• r' I J J ri�.� •c /•• J' f ,. I• J.r ■.' I Jr ■ !Jr r rF C J,x ■ r •I / r fJ q ' �, _ yr ,,.t.•'• ,. .' J �A � -. - � i.�?• r, JJ ■J+ rr ! J•• J J 1 ■' r J II r • � r I J ! rJ, r J .4 .'!,� I y� T ,n''-•le.. r. =� .!, �f.0 r i.' l., 1 ,3. :, ■ •' r' I % ! J ! _ - J r / J +. A •. ... y_. 'V,.. ! ,'�.'.a"/ R •!.� V �a IJ f V'. r. %'.y .�J I■ ■ i• ■ J� � • f F 1 J J + y , ■ Jr •• Ir fr ,r 1J ■� ■ J I�• F ■ I +I - ✓ r qqpp_ J +�}g �°_' }�•q.,y f�y✓yc / •' r� r1 JI .f r J •• r r ■-.J !,. .i J s 1 . J,y ��•F�`� �� y$ �� F,�� "��: S4S �� ■ �.� � +' ! � r - � J y• • y y /'r �f r J '•r J y'1 •JJ•• ■r ! 'r J � I y y � J !•• r �� 'l ^, r y•• 1 �r rrfr■ IJ r ■!J ■ ! it � Jr J"' J ■ y''J ■', �`�: y ��- y! F t11 J ' SyI. ��®®®yyy r J J /' J y r .• r -Jr JJ • y r v _ 1 '.,S'y., f. f•' '• �� Ri�i.' _ L �c �-1'�/��.�✓ - i - _w..J f y■ y r• r: � `r •n,■y •• Jy• j,JJ ,rJ r J+•J r■ .r~ .� = r y � ,.. J r~� �� l�R �+,'*1'a�.p..w-m�v.-�wa.— � 3.u.v.a7 y-�w�.q..�..s....e-.. .i+.vvw�.e..-.�...,w..�a+x�r.a r- J- Fr �' / y .•' •" / J,• ■' rJ- ✓'■ +I !r �Y'•rxP- emu" ;r`�..Z�JS •� r •rJ...✓ .F' ,+r+ ■ ! % fr rr I' I,n / _ ••r /' ''r r -+- r'+• - f r r , ■ r • ,� i•y ,. Jr r. / . • � J . ■r I Jr . y .• r p�/�.�}� _ f.•'- I J,+ ,r `r r ..r/ r/ .. y .sr f..'� .I" 1 r• o ■ .ter �RRt>ric�.. -. . � f . . . .. .. • ■i IJ yr Jr + ■r r Jy y.� r JF I ■ � J.! y• J'' '✓J ;,� - - - -- } - J r r •r'• r r• "i ;. .... }. ... fA _ .i I , rr y y,. F rJ. ■✓ /r'rJ ■r /■ %Jury yJI r,'-fi �'a-t y,..J /' .:"'-' S � � !_.... r •! Jam/ �y .".. r . .'. •. '.f ■• rY _�_,�~ r •r J�'• ■•ter I'P if ram• "• • .s` .J ■:�, ■ ! ■/ ��. �� :.� I I � � .. .. ..._—_...• :rr rr .J r,•✓✓.J y J �� J✓ J /J•• J` ■ rI . �y� r yrl,, / r'i K►RKLAND AVE Se ■ '�4''• ... - _ _ .. __ ��'/� .J J'. - - �'•_ .��. rr.r. y£. .�� - �lr. y "--_ / _. r.'f !JT r r,I yJ yr ■ Jl -JyJIy ',■■ ✓yr. rr.ryr _ f,•r�•1_ yJJ+y Jr._ - +•• •rr 1• J/ y"'• �,■1 ..+rrr !, y _ ,/• J rf, ■,r _✓r J'•. r_._ r rl,r _+ ,r'' J "o ! ..+ ;�. ■! .'�✓ ✓r �r /ryry r r■ /.� ,✓r•n rJ /r /•x 1' !J ,sr J J! !!I rr - yrr .. Jn .•'' .J r yyJyJJ -�' �■k r• � rr �: r- . .... _ r-�rF�y :+ 1623,p5�012 ■r •, rr' v` yI. �, '-r-"• `rr i" �J x� yJ /L. . .. y Jr r•. Jp 1 rL✓ J JJy rJ lJr•.I Jr •rry -'Z.'"J'aI ,�! rI-Ip /J yJ Jr Jr ry +.r F'' /I r•, ■/ ■+ J Jy Jr ■, !,, I.. Ir Jr. r1 rrr r•, ryJJrr y J .��, �-"� J'� • IJr yr' Jy yv !r ry I ,■ Jr .f, .r Jy. �K. :. ■'r.'�. ' ! r,r yJ r �r J•' ."' r n %` ✓ ,J .r + y x^.7* - ✓ r _. .• r r.r ✓y .r r'r .✓ Jr•Y J' r rr .�'w.,. •err:?. •yl+rJ%y yrr. �.•'116.2305967$-'.. .•II•, •-r.f '•.rJ -,J. r'r y. .Jr/r. r 'r •'.rr'r �';,& .r r ■ •y+ �.J r'' y'r ■��. f'.. r'r ''� !r • JJ J. rJr �.�!w,i - ' Jy . .rr-1 ! r r r y e ■L'`ryJ /! ■d Ay J.> P,'� r ■!✓ ■✓�•`r• ■ IJ AJI I1 Jr I yJ' !rr■• y •. SMr r�� I 1 �■ I .r• Jr y r rJ J y J- ✓ J Wetland or Stream Buffer Profile View 141 1 inch = 50 feet U �f� • 0 It O W H W 0 U) Q W LU N_ U W Z W 115-3 500 480 460 440 420 400 340 51320 280 260 '- 240 220 200 Project Corridor Q Potential Stringing Site -^r^- Stream Parcel MAP EXTENT ® a z5 5a I SITE PLAN Proposed Pole Location � Recommended Access- Proposed Pole � Wetland L� City Jurisdiction Boundary I I I Feet Newcastle .�� Existing Pole Location- Olympic Underground Wetland or Stream Buffer Profile View 1 inch = 50 feet • • To Be Removed Pipline (Approx. Location) Landslide Hazard Structure SOURCES: Roads and Parcels - King County (2015), Aerial Transmission Line- Proposed Wastewater Utility Line -King County (2015); Streams, Wetlands and Buffers, d BASED ON PSE ENGINEERING Landslide Hazard 50ft Buffer Conductor Landslide Hazard and Buffers, and Steep Slopes and Transmission Line- Existing ---' Water Utility Line Buffers from Watershed Company(2017). DESIGN REVISION N ® Steep Slope Ground Line 517 Proposed Pole Number Underground Gas Utility Line For cartographic purposes only. Renton p Steep Slope 50ft Buffer Major Elevation Grid C-16 Structure Type (SeeAppx. A) - - - Underground Phone/TV Utility Line Note:Note: Underground utility lines are surveyed in the - - Erosion Hazard - U R-414026 g Eion Hd - Major Station Grid vicinity of poles only. Existing Lake Tradition poles aren't Pa a 25 Of 30 Al Construction Scenario - - - Underground Power Utility Line represented by new conductors because they are an Key (See Appx. B) Unknown Underground Utility Line Minor Station Grid existing line, and are being represented due to the poles Date: Dec 2020 being replaced. ^' 7 C F W 0 V) H fn Q W I W N_ 0 W W Z W 00 N I H W W 2 fn Project Corridor 0 Proposed Pole Location Existing Pole Location - To Be Removed Transmission Line - Proposed Transmission Line - Existing 517 Proposed Pole Number C-16 Structure Type (see Appx. A) Al Construction Scenario Key (See Appx. B) - Potential Stringing Site Recommended Access- Proposed Pole Olympic Underground Pipline (Approx. Location) - • Wastewater Utility Line - • Water Utility Line Underground Gas Utility Line - - - Underground Phone/TV Utility Line - - - Underground Power Utility Line - - Unknown Underground Utility Line ^M^- Stream Wetland OWetland or Stream Buffer Landslide Hazard Landslide Hazard 50ft Buffer ® Steep Slope Steep Slope 50ft Buffer Erosion Hazard Parcel L - City Jurisdiction Boundary Profile View Structure Conductor Ground Line Major Elevation Grid - - - Major Station Grid - Minor Station Grid ® 0 25 50 I I I Feet 1 inch = 50 feet SOURCES: Roads and Parcels - King County (2015), Aerial - King County (2015); Streams, Wetlands and Buffers, Landslide Hazard and Buffers, and Steep Slopes and Buffers from Watershed Company (2017). For cartographic purposes only Note: Note: Underground utility lines are surveyed in the vicinity of poles only. Existing Lake Tradition poles aren't represented by new conductors because they are an existing line, and are being represented due to the poles being replaced. MAP EXTENT Newcastle. Renton - d SITE PLAN BASED ON PSE ENGINEERING DESIGN REVISION N R-414027 Page 26 of 30 Date: 8/23/2018 LO N H W w 2 CO) W Z J 2 U Q (D CD i W H W 0 V) H U) Q W I W N_ 0 W W Z W a) N LI r W W r2�^ U) -2023059050 %2023059050 N H Wztff W 2 Z ' C-1 2023059001Al E i U K W 2023059001 N a 'a ^ U } • 1 Category _ jig-+• 'a i 00 620 620 a 600 - I I 0/6 600 w 580 I DCT2 580 w 560 I 125FT sso 0 540, I STA=31 +83.14 540 52o I HT=109FT ELE=400.66 520 w 50 I 500 0 480 700 I 480 " 460 I 460 / a 440 I 440 t 420 I 420 ---------------- g 400 400 a 380 I + 380 t 360 o o 360 a 340 I 340 MProject Corridor - Potential Stringing Site — Stream Parcel MAP EXTENT SITE PLAN 0 Proposed Pole Location Recommended Access- Proposed Pole Wetland i---, L - City Jurisdiction Boundary 0 I 25 I I 50 Feet () t (Newcastle .�� Existing Pole Location- Olympic Underground O Wetland or Stream Buffer Profile View 1 inch = 50 feet ` • ; • • To Be Removed Pipline (Approx. Location) Landslide Hazard Structure SOURCES: Roads and Parcels -Kin Count 2015 Aerial g y ( ), Transmission Line - Proposed ---' Wastewater Utility Line Landslide Hazard 50ft Buffer Conductor King County (2015); Streams, Wetlands and Buffers, Landslide Hazard and Buffers, and Steep Slopes and d BASED ON PSE ENGINEERING - Transmission Line - Existing ---' Water Utility Line ® Steep Slope Ground Line Buffers from Watershed Company (2017). �� DESIGN REVISION N 517 Proposed Pole Number p Underground Gas Utility Line Steep Slope 50ft Buffer Major Elevation Grid For cartographic purposes only. Renton C-16 Structure Type (SeeAppx. A) — — — Underground Phone/TV Utility Line — — — Erosion Hazard — — — Major Station Grid Note:Note: Underground utility lines are surveyed in the vicinity of poles only. Existing Lake Tradition poles aren't . _ U R-414028 Page 27 of 30 Al Construction Scenario Underground Power Utility Line represented by new conductors because they are an 4 Key (See Appx. B) — — Unknown Underground Utility Line - Minor Station Grid existing line, and are being represented due to the poles Date: Dec 2020 being replaced. W N H W W 2 co W Z J 2 U Q 0 O W I— W 0 V) I— fn Q W I W N_ 0 W W Z W O M I I— W W 2 fn MProject Corridor 0 Proposed Pole Location Existing Pole Location - GO To Be Removed Transmission Line - Proposed Transmission Line - Existing 517 Proposed Pole Number C-16 Structure Type (See Appx. A) Al Construction Scenario Key (See Appx. B) - Potential Stringing Site Recommended Access- Proposed Pole Olympic Underground Pipline (Approx. Location) - • Wastewater Utility Line - • Water Utility Line Underground Gas Utility Line - - - Underground Phone/TV Utility Line - - - Underground Power Utility Line - - Unknown Underground Utility Line ^M^- Stream Wetland OWetland or Stream Buffer Landslide Hazard Landslide Hazard 50ft Buffer ® Steep Slope Steep Slope 50ft Buffer Erosion Hazard Parcel L - City Jurisdiction Boundary Profile View Structure Conductor Ground Line Major Elevation Grid - - - Major Station Grid - Minor Station Grid ® 0 25 50 I I I Feet 1 inch = 50 feet SOURCES: Roads and Parcels - King County (2015), Aerial - King County (2015); Streams, Wetlands and Buffers, Landslide Hazard and Buffers, and Steep Slopes and Buffers from Watershed Company (2017). For cartographic purposes only Note: Note: Underground utility lines are surveyed in the vicinity of poles only. Existing Lake Tradition poles aren't represented by new conductors because they are an existing line, and are being represented due to the poles being replaced. MAP EXTENT Newcast L Y- d Renton L d SITE PLAN BASED ON PSE ENGINEERING DESIGN REVISION N R-414029 Page 28 of 30 Date: Dec 2020 r- N H W W 2 U) W Z J 2 U Q CD O W H LLI 0 U) Q LU I LU N_ U W Z W co IL— LU W 2 U) MProject Corridor Q Potential Stringing Site ^^r^- Stream Parcel MAP EXTENT O Proposed Pole Location Recommended Access- Proposed Pole � Wetland L j City Jurisdiction Boundary ® I ZI5 I50 Ne we a stld Olympic Underground O Wetland Stream Buffer _ Feet 1 inch = 50 feet .�� Existing Pole Location- or Profile View • To Be Removed Pipline (Approx. Location) Landslide Hazard Structure SOURCES: Roads and Parcels - King County (2015), Aerial Transmission Line - Proposed Wastewater Utility Line Landslide Hazard 50ft Buffer Conductor King County (2015); Streams, Wetlands and Buffers, Landslide Hazard and Buffers, and Steep Slopes and d Transmission Line - Existing ---' Water Utility Line ® Steep Slope Ground Line Buffers from Watershed Company (2017). For �& 517 Proposed Pole Number p Underground Gas Utility Line O Steep Slope 50ft Buffer Major Elevation Grid cartographic purposes only. Renton C-16 Al Structure Type (See Appx. A) Construction Scenario — — — Underground Phone/TV Utility Line — — — Underground Power Utility Line Erosion Hazard — — — Major Station Grid Note:Note: Underground utility lines are surveyed in the vicinity of poles only. Existing Lake Tradition poles aren't represented by new conductors because they are an ` d Key (See App B x. ) Unknown Underground Utility Line Minor Station Grid existing line, and are being represented due to the poles being replaced. ^^ SITE PLAN BASED ON PSE ENGINEERING DESIGN REVISION N R-414030 Page 29 of 30 Date: Dec 2020 00 N H W W 2 U) W Z J 2 U a CD O W H LLI 0 U) Q LU I w N_ U W Z W MProject Corridor Q Potential Stringing Site ^^r^- Stream Parcel MAP EXTENT O Proposed Pole Location Recommended Access- Proposed Pole Wetland i---, City Jurisdiction Boundary 0 0 I I25 5I () ) Newcastle Existing Pole Location- Olympic Underground Wetland or Stream Buffer L - Profile View Feet 1 inch = 50 feet • To Be Removed Pipline (Approx. Location) Landslide Hazard Structure SOURCES: Roads and Parcels - King County (2015), Aerial Transmission Line - Proposed Wastewater Utility Line Landslide Hazard 50ft Buffer Conductor King County (2015); Streams, Wetlands and Buffers, Landslide Hazard and Buffers, and Steep Slopes and d Transmission Line - Existing ---' Water Utility Line ® Steep Slope Ground Line Buffers from Watershed Company (2017). For �& 517 Proposed Pole Number p Underground Gas Utility Line O Steep Slope 50ft Buffer Major Elevation Grid cartographic purposes only. Renton C-16 Al Structure Type (See Appx. A) Construction Scenario — — — Underground Phone/TV Utility Line — — — Underground Power Utility Line Erosion Hazard — — — Major Station Grid Note:Note: Underground utility lines are surveyed in the vicinity of poles only. Existing Lake Tradition poles aren't represented by new conductors because they are an ` _ d Key (See App B x. ) Unknown Underground Utility Line Minor Station Grid existing line, and are being represented due to the poles being replaced. ^' SITE PLAN BASED ON PSE ENGINEERING DESIGN REVISION N R-414031 Page 30 of 30 Date: Dec 2020 rn N H W W S N W Z J S U a CD 0 LLI LLI 0 U) Q LU I LU N_ U IX LU Z LU (M Cl) H I w LLI 2 U) ENERGIZE EA5T!51PE 230KV - STRUCTURE TYKES �+ NOTE: FOR SPECIFIC LOCATIONS AND HEIGHTS, SEE PROFILE SHEETS C-1 C- 991 WHEN CONDUCTOR (23OkV) WHEN CONDUCTOR (23OkV) (23OkV) ON SUSPENSION DEAD END5 ON ARM INSULATORS ZI (23OkV) (23OkV) C-16A C-16 B (23OkV) (23OkV) C-17 A C-17 B C-18 A C-18 B (23OkV) (23OkV) Structure Type Structure Height Naming Convention Description SCDE 65'-105' C-18 A/B Single circuit deadend SCT 85'-90' C-16 A/B Single circuit tangent DCT 70'-120' C-1 / C-19 Double circuit tangent (D denotes OHGW overhead groundwire) SCHDE 50' C-17 A/B Single circuit horizontal deadend (only under SCL line) SCA 90'-95' C-2 A/B Single circuit angle *number after type in table denotes angle STRUCTURE TYPES BASED ON PSE ENGINEERING DESIGN REVISION N R-414032 Appendix A Date: Dec 2020 CD 0 W W 0 1— U) Q W I W N_ U tY W Z W Construction Scenario Al R/W Pale Type -------------------------------- Single Pole - . 1 Temporary Work Area Approx. 2,500 sq. ft. Access' ! General Installation Type Work Area' Direct Embed ,. Additional Considerations Direct Place pole in hale and '-�•"� Pale / backlill annulus • ` r ' • • R, W Terroin/topography dependent See mop sheets Typical Construction Scenario Structure Type (Not in critical area) C-1 Al C-2 C 1 C-16 Al C-17 C 1 C-18 C 1 Construction Scenario C1 R/W Pale Type --__---- _-_--------- Single Pole ACC r . Temporary Work Area Approx. 5,000 sq, It. Installation Type t Foundation Foundation I• r — 711— , Additional Considerations 1 I I Build foundation and L L�--�-i pole Iinstall pole General Work Area' ti , - , Re v4 " Tenoin/topogrophy dependent . - - - - - ' See mop sheets CONSTRUCTION SCENARIOS BASED ON PSE ENGINEERING DESIGN REVISION N R-414033 Appendix B Date: Dec 2020 w N CD ry w Z W coLO �I W w U) PSE RENTON MITIGATION: TALBOT AND HONEY DEW CREEK SITES WON ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ .01 000 F PROPOSEDENHANCEMENT 4 PREPARE SOIL PER D / i PARCEL # / 2023059001 / AMEN IOLYMPIC PIPELINE I I I 1 1 3 2 THE WATERSHED COMPANY 750 Sixth Street South e Kirkland WA 98033 coug Washington c'' NE. 22nb p 425.822.5242 www.watershedco.com Science & Design 4 Honey Creek - NE 22nd`_ a — 0 p en Space _ rr .�h�tt _ m _ — �� Renton SE 104#h�,`II �}}yyrrFF _ = Airport r , 2 - - Farb{ iYE L13! - / [Yi3�t� LIl-�� .� u+a'� � ..�___. ��•c re-..,eE f - - _ _ EE230 CORRIDOR on ray}:. HONEY DEW r L Y ? 1. fi4 Lrieek oar:: e p r , ^ W W x PROJECT VE 14th , i �S s�� T V L NE 17th LOCATION s ; ��m="`'' coC Nrsttl - x �. ` a vah xn O Park F. r•.. 01,1 . /� 7 = SF : et\ - L =� e O O N R01 E 15t� E n.r s =:2 Uj M CN .v C) �O VICINITY MAP HONEY DEW CREEK Z W PARCEL # APPROXIMATE EDGE 2023059003 OF SHRUBS AND LOW -GROWING TREES (UNMOWED AREA) \ PS ./ i 41/ i N R05 i TALBOT MITIGATION PLAN SCALE: 1 " = 20' SE5 ZZ) — N <0w TALBOT Cedar River � Z � Q M Q PROJECT Natural W W LOCATION Zone Wiaryp O O Z oo O t � o Lid W Lu ' W LL Z C'4 gO SE p� o W N °SE LU r 0� W VICINITY MAP TALBOT Q v LU Q I..L SHEET INDEX 1. TALBOT MITIGATION PLAN 2. TALBOT PLANTING PLAN 3. HONEY DEW CREEK HABITAT TREE PLAN 4. PLANTING, SOIL PREP & HABITAT DETAILS 5. PLANTING & MITIGATION NOTES (1 OF 2) 6. PLANTING & MITIGATION NOTES (2 OF 2) LEGEND APPROXIMATE PARCEL BOUNDARY WETLAND BUFFER (100—FT) APPROXIMATE WETLAND BOUNDARY PROPOSED ENHANCEMENT AREA (9,500 SF) X TREE TO BE REMOVED PrA N 0 10' 20' 40' 80' NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION © Copyright- The Watershed Company m _j w z 0 w 06 z J Q O m U 0 Z) U) U) o 00 w o Q 00 o 0 OT SHEET SIZE: ORIGINAL PLAN IS 22" x 34". SCALE ACCORDINGLY. W PROJECT MANAGER: JC Z DESIGNED: LM DRAFTED: LM CHECKED: JC/MF JOB NUMBER: r m 111103.11 W Z SHEET NUMBER: IL 1 OF6< 0 W 0 U) Cn Q w w N ry w Z W C w W Cn All \A//lllr'% fliJIM RAI II f-LJ f]IAI/'O TALBOT PLANTING PLAN SCALE: 1 " = 10' / N R01 I 10 PLANT SPECIES LIST n TREES ACER CIRCINATUM / VINE MAPLE CRATAEGUS DOUGLASII / BLACK HAWTHORN AMELANCHIER ALNIFOLIA / PACIFIC SERVICEBERRY SHRUBS CORYLUS CORNUTA / BEAKED HAZELNUT MAHONIA AQUIFOLIUM / OREGON GRAPE OEMLERIA CERASIFORMUS / OSOBERRY SYMPHORICARPOS ALBUS / SNOWBERRY HOLODISCUS DISCOLOR / OCEAN SPRAY PHILADELPHUS LEWISII / MOCK ORANGE GROUNDCOVER PTERIDIUM AQUILINUM / BRACKEN FERN POLYSTICHUM MUNITUM / SWORD FERN GAULTHERIA SHALLON / SALAL NOTES 1. REMOVE INVASIVES AND PREPARE SITE. SEE SOIL PREP DETAIL. F 2. SEE MITIGATION NOTES, SHEETS 5 AND 6. 4 PARCEL # LEGEND 2023059003 APPROXIMATE PARCEL BOUNDARY WETLAND BUFFER (100-FT) APPROXIMATE WETLAND BOUNDARY SIZE SPACING QUAD 2 GAL 9' O.C. 25 2 GAL 9' O.C. 28 2 THE WATERSHED COMPANY 750 Sixth Street South Kirkland WA 98033 p 425.822.5242 www.watershedco.com 2GAL 91O.C. 25 Science & Design 1 GAL 6' O.C. 50 1 GAL 6' O.C. 50 1 GAL 6' O.C. 50 1 GAL 6' O.C. 50 0 Lo 1 GAL 6' O.C. 50 fr co �J W O.) 1 GAL 6' O.C. 50 z LO O W C) 04 1 GAL 24" O.C. 500 ~ H C) W O 1 GAL 24" O.C. 500 � z z Q N — ,,I- 1 GAL 24" O.C. 500 Q O U) M Lf) I --I 0- U) Ln o00 r-� � U) rn ZWQco Q W 00 Nt O� W r z O Qo O E-+ 0C� a' z o w — O W M oc z N p� p W N W W J � Q W a 0- 0� w Q oc � PVA74 0 5' 10, 20' 40' ii hi NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION © Copyright- The Watershed Company g U) z O w rr 06 z J Q Q z d 0 Z m U C7 U H 0 5 00 T W C) Q 00 _O C) O z T SHEET SIZE: ORIGINAL PLAN IS 22" x 34" SCALE ACCORDINGLY. PROJECT MANAGER: JC DESIGNED: LM DRAFTED: LM CHECKED: JC/MF w Z ' JOB NUMBER: m 111103.11 W Z SHEET NUMBER: a 2 OF6< 0 0 w w 0 C) Cn Q w w N ry w z w CM �I w w U) 'i / 1541 �533 HX SX 1542 S, 1534 1536 �`1535 H X 1537 / / HX / I / 1540 / / 1539 / / 1534 1543 / 1570 / S 1548 1544 / / I 1547 1546\% / 1550DO 1545 0 / 1583 PARCEL # QQe / I 0423059035 1581 1553 F / 1549 `1582 / 551 155 OFF 1° 1547 \ / I 1554 I \ \ \ 1571 / \ / 1555 / 1556 I 1559 I �/ 3vG' / 1557 / �� Q� / 1560 41558 / I P / 1563 1562 H 1564 J 1565 PARCEL # SX 1568 _ — = 0423059342 1566\ / / §1573 / HONEY DEW CREEK HABITAT TREE PLAN SCALE: 1 " = 20' 4*91:1011�1 — — — — — — PSE EASEMENT BOUNDARY SX TREES TO BE SNAGGED (8) B 4 HX TREES TO BE HINGE CUT (8) k 4 TREES TO REMAIN STREAM BUFFER (115' STANDARD BUFFER, EXTENDED TO TOP OF ADJACENT PROTECTED SLOPES) PROPERTY BOUNDARY — — — — STREAM (APPROXIMATE) TAG # COMMON NAME / BOTANICAL NAME DBH (IN) TRUNK TREATMENT 1533 Red alder / Alnus rubra 12.3 Sna 1534 Western redcedar / Thuja plicata 10.6 Snag 1535 Red alder / Alnus rubra 8.8 Hinge -cut 1537 Bi leaf maple / Aver macro h Ilum 8.0 Hin e-cut 1538 Red alder / Alnus rubra 13.7 Snag 1539 Red alder / Alnus rubra 7.7 Hinge -cut 1540 Red alder / Alnus rubra 14.8 Snag 1541 Western hemlock / Tsu a heteroph Ila 4.0 Hinge -cut 1548 Red alder / Alnus rubra 8.1 Hinge -cut 1557 Western redcedar / Thuja plicata 18.2 Snag 1558 Western redcedar / Thuja plicata 5.9 Hinge -cut 1562 Western redcedar / Thuja plicata 8.3 Hinge -cut 1563 Western redcedar / Thuja plicata 7.3 Hinge -cut 1564 Western redcedar / Thuja plicata 11.5 Snag 1568 Western redcedar / Thuja plicata 16.0 Snag 1570 Western redcedar / Thuja plicata 10.0 Snag 0 10' 20' 40' 80' NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION © Copyright- The Watershed Company 2 THE WATERSHED COMPANY 750 Sixth Street South Kirkland WA 98033 p 425.822.5242 www.watershedco.com Science & Design NV 0. w Z w 0 Z Z Q J0 U) co -j U) z O w 06 z J Q z 0- 0o m Q U o 00 T W C) O 1 0 0 z 0 w Q w OC w 0 U) Cn Q w w N V w Z w SHEET SIZE: M O LO O IZI- 04 N M Lf) co CN Nt O r 0 LO 0 0 N w U OC Q w ORIGINAL PLAN IS 22" x 34". SCALE ACCORDINGLY. L0 00 0) >Q z O z w 0C w PROJECT MANAGER: JC Z DESIGNED: LM ' DRAFTED: LM CHECKED: JC/MF JOB NUMBER: m 111103.11 W Z SHEET NUMBER: CL 3 OF6� 0 w 0 Q w W �Nn V ry W z w M �I W W PLAN VIEW OF CUT 15" DBH HORIZONTAL BACK -CUT AT HEIGHT BETWEEN THREE AND SIX FEET ABOVE GROUND LINE. HINGE -FELLED TREES SHALL BE VERIFIED BY THE RESTORATION SPECIALIST. PLUNGE CUT AND/OR NOTCH WHEN APPROPRIATE. SEE NOTES BELOW. EXISTING CONDITION STEP ONE OPTIONAL NOTCH HINGE BACK CUT 12" WIDE HINGE (80% OF DBH) PUSH TREE OVER OR PULL TRUNK TOWARD CHOSEN FALL DIRECTION, AND LEAVE ATTACHED TO HINGE. NOTES: 1. SEE PLAN FOR LOCATION. VERIFY FALL DIRECTION IN FIELD WITH ASSISTANCE FROM THE RESTORATION CONSULTANT. 2. TREE SHALL HAVE PLIABLE WOOD AND A MAXIMUM DBH OF 15 INCHES. 4. USING ONLY A BACK CUT THAT DOES NOT FULLY SEVER THE TREE'S TRUNK FROM THE STUMP, LEAVE THE FALLEN TREE CONNECTED TO THE STUMP BY A "HINGE" OF BARK. 5. THE LENGTH OF THE HINGE SHOULD BE 80% OF THE DBH. VERIFY WITH RESTORATION CONSULTANT BASED ON SPECIES. 6. FOR LARGER DBH TREES, PENETRATE TRUNK WITH A VERTICAL PLUNGE CUT PRIOR TO HORIZONTAL BACK CUT, OR MAKE A SHALLOW NOTCH, 1-2 INCHES DEEP, ON THE SIDE OF THE TREE FACING ITS FALL DIRECTION. HINGE CUT TREE 5' CORONET CUT OR MACHINE BREAK UPWARD BAT SLITS. MIN. 13'-0" SNAG HEIGHT, LL LIMBS REMAIN 11III=III= � � � IIIIIIIII1 SNAG TREE SNAG NOTES: SEE TREE SNAG TABLE FOR TREES WHICH ARE TO BE RETAINED AS SNAGS. ALL TREES SHOULD BE: 1. SNAGS ON SITE ARE TO BE TOPPED BY CLIMBING ARBORIST TO HEIGHT AS INDIVIDUALLY CONFIRMED ON TREE INDEX TABLE. 2. LEAVE TOP OF SNAG ON THE GROUND NEARBY AND ANGLE LOG PERPENDICULAR TO SLOPE. 3. ONCE TOP HAS BEEN REMOVED ARBORIST IS TO MAKE A CORONET CUT TO GIVE A NATURAL BREAK APPEARANCE. 4. RETAIN ALL BRANCHES FOR PERCHES AND HABITAT STRUCTURES- DO NOT LIMB. 5. LIVE TREES SHOULD BE DEADENED BY CUTTING TWO 6" WIDE, ANGLED BANDS AROUND THE BASE OF THE TREE WITH AN AXE OR BY MAKING TWO CUTS AROUND THE TREE WITH A CHAIN SAW TO A DEPTH OF APPROXIMATELY 1 INCH BELOW THE BARK LAYER. BAT ROOSTING SLIT NOTES 1. TO MAKE BAT ROOSTING CUTS, BEGIN APPROXIMATELY T-0" BELOW CORONET CUT AT TOP OF SNAG. AT AN ANGLE OF 80 DEGREES TO THE GROUND, CUT INTO TREE TRUNK WITH AN UPWARD SLANT. MAKE 3 PARALLEL CUTS, APPROXIMATELY 2'-0" DEEP. 2. FACE OF BAT ROOST SLITS ARE TO FACE EAST OR SOUTH DEPENDING ON AVAILABILITY OF SUNLIGHT IN THE MORNING HOURS. 3. TO DETER SPECIES SUCH AS WASPS FROM INHABITING ROOST AREAS IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT CUTS BE MADE TO A THICKNESS OF 3/4". Scale: NTS Scale: NTS NOTES: 1. PLANT GROUNDCOVER AT SPECIFIED DISTANCE ON -CENTER (O.C.) USING TRIANGULAR SPACING, TYP. 2. LOOSEN SIDES AND BOTTOM OF PLANTING PIT AND REMOVE DEBRIS 3. LOOSEN ROOTBOUND PLANTS BEFORE INSTALLING 4. SOAK PIT BEFORE AND AFTER INSTALLING PLANT SPECIFIED MULCH LAYER. HOLD BACK MULCH FROM STEMS GROUNDCOVER PLANTING I I- 2X MIN DIA. ROOTBALL CONTAINER PLANTING 2" COMPOST PLANTING. SOIL PREP & HABITAT DETAILS 411 R A 1 11^1 1 n STEP 1 STEP 2 SOIL PREPARATION STEP 3 Scale: NTS IF VEGETATION EXISTS WITHIN PLANTING AREA, SPACE AT 3 X FROM STEM OF EXISTING VEGETATION AREA FOR SPACING ADJUSTMENT NOTE: FIRST PLACE PLANTS ALONG THE PERIMETER OF THE PLANTING AREA, AND AROUND EXISTING VEGETATION. THEN SPACE THE REMAINDER OF THE PLANTINGS. X = PLANT SPA = PLANT TRIANGULAR SPACING NOTES: 1. PLANTING PIT SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN (2) TIMES THE WIDTH OF THE ROOT BALL DIA. 2. LOOSEN SIDES AND BOTTOMS OF PLANTING PIT 3. SOAK PLANTING PIT AFTER PLANTING REMOVE FROM POT OR BURLAP & ROUGH -UP ROOT BALL BEFORE INSTALLING. UNTANGLE AND STRAIGHTEN CIRCLING ROOTS - PRUNE IF NECESSARY. IF PLANT IS EXCEPTIONALLY ROOT -BOUND, DO NOT PLANT AND RETURN TO NURSERY FOR AN ACCEPTABLE ALTERNATIVE SPECIFIED MULCH LAYER. HOLD BACK MULCH FROM TRUNK/STEMS FINISH GRADE REMOVE DEBRIS AND LARGE ROCKS FROM PLANTING PIT AND SCARIFY SIDES AND BASE. BACKFILL WITH SPECIFIED SOIL. FIRM UP SOIL AROUND PLANT. Scale: NTS STEP 1 REMOVE UNDESIRABLE SPECIES. ADDRESS COMPACTION: COMPACTION LEVELS SHOULD BE APPROPRIATE FOR ROOT GROWTH (75-85% PROCTOR DENSITY) OR AS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY ENGINEER. DRAINAGE RATE SHALL BE BETWEEN 1 - 5 INCHES PER HOUR OR AS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. WORK WITHIN EXISTING ROOT ZONES SHALL BE DONE BY HAND. PLACE TWO (2) INCHES COMPOST. STEP 2 INCORPORATE COMPOST TO AN EIGHT (8) INCH DEPTH. STEP 3 INSTALL MULCH RINGS FOUR (4) INCHES DEEP. INSTALL PLANTS. Scale: NTS 2/3 X Scale: NTS NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION THE WATERSHED COMPANY 750 Sixth Street South Kirkland WA 98033 p 425.822.5242 www.watershedco.com Science & Design (� Lo co 0 z Ln o H W N W o Z Z V �QO(nMLL' �(/)~ 0 L0 00 zwaN 0Q W � 0 0 W r z 0 Q�N o O �., 0 0 M z —�� Ln W — OwMoc L.L z N r) W CD rT, w 4�9 �—�-i 0� J � Q W LU Q I^.L ml� Z O U) W 06 z J J Q z a- �_ � O m U O U) H W o 2 00 � o Q °o oC) 0 O Z T SHEET SIZE: ORIGINAL PLAN IS 22" x 34". SCALE ACCORDINGLY. PROJECT MANAGER: JC w Z DESIGNED: LM DRAFTED: LM LL CHECKED: JC/MF JOB NUMBER: m 111103.11 W Z SHEET NUMBER: 4 OF6LU 0 SCALE: NTS © Copyright- The Watershed Company O O LLJ LLJ 0 U) W Q LLI LU N 0 ry LU z LU CM I LU LU U) PLANT INSTALLATION SPECIFICATIONS GENERAL NOTES QUALITY ASSURANCE 1. PLANTS SHALL MEET OR EXCEED THE SPECIFICATIONS OF FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL LAWS REQUIRING INSPECTION FOR PLANT DISEASE AND INSECT CONTROL. 2. PLANTS SHALL BE HEALTHY, VIGOROUS, AND WELL -FORMED, WITH WELL DEVELOPED, FIBROUS ROOT SYSTEMS, FREE FROM DEAD BRANCHES OR ROOTS. PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM DAMAGE CAUSED BY TEMPERATURE EXTREMES, LACK OR EXCESS OF MOISTURE, INSECTS, DISEASE, AND MECHANICAL INJURY. PLANTS IN LEAF SHALL BE WELL FOLIATED AND OF GOOD COLOR. PLANTS SHALL BE HABITUATED TO THE OUTDOOR ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS INTO WHICH THEY WILL BE PLANTED (HARDENED -OFF). 3. TREES WITH DAMAGED, CROOKED, MULTIPLE OR BROKEN LEADERS WILL BE REJECTED. WOODY PLANTS WITH ABRASIONS OF THE BARK OR SUN SCALD WILL BE REJECTED. 4. NOMENCLATURE: PLANT NAMES SHALL CONFORM TO FLORA OF THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST BY HITCHCOCK AND CRONQUIST, UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON PRESS, 1973 AND/OR TO A FIELD GUIDE TO THE COMMON WETLAND PLANTS OF WESTERN WASHINGTON & NORTHWESTERN OREGON, ED. SARAH SPEAR COOKE, SEATTLE AUDUBON SOCIETY, 1997. DEFINITIONS 1. PLANTS/PLANT MATERIALS. PLANTS AND PLANT MATERIALS SHALL INCLUDE ANY LIVE PLANT MATERIAL USED ON THE PROJECT. THIS INCLUDES BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO CONTAINER GROWN, B&B OR BAREROOT PLANTS; LIVE STAKES AND FASCINES (WATTLES); TUBERS, CORMS, BULBS, ETC..; SPRIGS, PLUGS, AND LINERS. 2. CONTAINER GROWN. CONTAINER GROWN PLANTS ARE THOSE WHOSE ROOTBALLS ARE ENCLOSED IN A POT OR BAG IN WHICH THAT PLANT GREW. SUBSTITUTIONS 1. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO OBTAIN SPECIFIED MATERIALS IN ADVANCE IF SPECIAL GROWING, MARKETING OR OTHER ARRANGEMENTS MUST BE MADE IN ORDER TO SUPPLY SPECIFIED MATERIALS. 2. SUBSTITUTION OF PLANT MATERIALS NOT ON THE PROJECT LIST WILL NOT BE PERMITTED UNLESS AUTHORIZED IN WRITING BY THE RESTORATION CONSULTANT. 3. IF PROOF IS SUBMITTED THAT ANY PLANT MATERIAL SPECIFIED IS NOT OBTAINABLE, A PROPOSAL WILL BE CONSIDERED FOR USE OF THE NEAREST EQUIVALENT SIZE OR ALTERNATIVE SPECIES, WITH CORRESPONDING ADJUSTMENT OF CONTRACT PRICE. 4. SUCH PROOF WILL BE SUBSTANTIATED AND SUBMITTED IN WRITING TO THE CONSULTANT AT LEAST 30 DAYS PRIOR TO START OF WORK UNDER THIS SECTION. INSPECTION 1. PLANTS SHALL BE SUBJECT TO INSPECTION AND APPROVAL BY THE RESTORATION CONSULTANT FOR CONFORMANCE TO SPECIFICATIONS, EITHER AT TIME OF DELIVERY ON -SITE OR AT THE GROWER'S NURSERY. APPROVAL OF PLANT MATERIALS AT ANY TIME SHALL NOT IMPAIR THE SUBSEQUENT RIGHT OF INSPECTION AND REJECTION DURING PROGRESS OF THE WORK. 2. PLANTS INSPECTED ON SITE AND REJECTED FOR NOT MEETING SPECIFICATIONS MUST BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY FROM SITE OR RED -TAGGED AND REMOVED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. 3. THE RESTORATION CONSULTANT MAY ELECT TO INSPECT PLANT MATERIALS AT THE PLACE OF GROWTH. AFTER INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE, THE RESTORATION CONSULTANT MAY REQUIRE THE INSPECTED PLANTS BE LABELED AND RESERVED FOR PROJECT. SUBSTITUTION OF THESE PLANTS WITH OTHER INDIVIDUALS, EVEN OF THE SAME SPECIES AND SIZE, IS UNACCEPTABLE. MEASUREMENT OF PLANTS 1. PLANTS SHALL CONFORM TO SIZES SPECIFIED UNLESS SUBSTITUTIONS ARE MADE AS OUTLINED IN THIS CONTRACT. 2. HEIGHT AND SPREAD DIMENSIONS SPECIFIED REFER TO MAIN BODY OF PLANT AND NOT BRANCH OR ROOT TIP TO TIP. PLANT DIMENSIONS SHALL BE MEASURED WHEN THEIR BRANCHES OR ROOTS ARE IN THEIR NORMAL POSITION. 3. WHERE A RANGE OF SIZE IS GIVEN, NO PLANT SHALL BE LESS THAN THE MINIMUM SIZE AND AT LEAST 50% OF THE PLANTS SHALL BE AS LARGE AS THE MEDIAN OF THE SIZE RANGE. (EXAMPLE: IF THE SIZE RANGE IS 12" TO 18", AT LEAST 50% OF PLANTS MUST BE 15" TALL.). SUBMITTALS PROPOSED PLANT SOURCES 1. WITHIN 45 DAYS AFTER AWARD OF THE CONTRACT, SUBMIT A COMPLETE LIST OF PLANT MATERIALS PROPOSED TO BE PROVIDED DEMONSTRATING CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS SPECIFIED. INCLUDE THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL GROWERS AND NURSERIES. PRODUCT CERTIFICATES 1. PLANT MATERIALS LIST - SUBMIT DOCUMENTATION TO CONSULTANT AT LEAST 30 DAYS PRIOR TO START OF WORK UNDER THIS SECTION THAT PLANT MATERIALS HAVE BEEN ORDERED. ARRANGE PROCEDURE FOR INSPECTION OF PLANT MATERIAL WITH CONSULTANT AT TIME OF SUBMISSION. 2. HAVE COPIES OF VENDOR'S OR GROWERS' INVOICES OR PACKING SLIPS FOR ALL PLANTS ON SITE DURING INSTALLATION. INVOICE OR PACKING SLIP SHOULD LIST SPECIES BY SCIENTIFIC NAME, QUANTITY, AND DATE DELIVERED (AND GENETIC ORIGIN IF THAT INFORMATION WAS PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED). DELIVERY, HANDLING, & STORAGE NOTIFICATION CONTRACTOR MUST NOTIFY CONSULTANT 48 HOURS OR MORE IN ADVANCE OF DELIVERIES SO THAT CONSULTANT MAY ARRANGE FOR INSPECTION. PLANT MATERIALS 1. TRANSPORTATION - DURING SHIPPING, PLANTS SHALL BE PACKED TO PROVIDE PROTECTION AGAINST CLIMATE EXTREMES, BREAKAGE AND DRYING. PROPER VENTILATION AND PREVENTION OF DAMAGE TO BARK, BRANCHES, AND ROOT SYSTEMS MUST BE ENSURED. 2. SCHEDULING AND STORAGE - PLANTS SHALL BE DELIVERED AS CLOSE TO PLANTING AS POSSIBLE. PLANTS IN STORAGE MUST BE PROTECTED AGAINST ANY CONDITION THAT IS DETRIMENTAL TO THEIR CONTINUED HEALTH AND VIGOR. 3. HANDLING - PLANT MATERIALS SHALL NOT BE HANDLED BY THE TRUNK, LIMBS, OR FOLIAGE BUT ONLY BY THE CONTAINER, BALL, BOX, OR OTHER PROTECTIVE STRUCTURE, EXCEPT BAREROOT PLANTS SHALL BE KEPT IN BUNDLES UNTIL PLANTING AND THEN HANDLED CAREFULLY BY THE TRUNK OR STEM. 4. LABELS - PLANTS SHALL HAVE DURABLE, LEGIBLE LABELS STATING CORRECT SCIENTIFIC NAME AND SIZE. TEN PERCENT OF CONTAINER GROWN PLANTS IN INDIVIDUAL POTS SHALL BE LABELED. PLANTS SUPPLIED IN FLATS, RACKS, BOXES, BAGS, OR BUNDLES SHALL HAVE ONE LABEL PER GROUP. WARRANTY PLANT WARRANTY PLANTS MUST BE GUARANTEED TO BE TRUE TO SCIENTIFIC NAME AND SPECIFIED SIZE, AND TO BE HEALTHY AND CAPABLE OF VIGOROUS GROWTH. REPLACEMENT 1. PLANTS NOT FOUND MEETING ALL OF THE REQUIRED CONDITIONS AT THE CONSULTANT'S DISCRETION MUST BE REMOVED FROM SITE AND REPLACED IMMEDIATELY AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. 2. PLANTS NOT SURVIVING AFTER ONE YEAR TO BE REPLACED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. PLANT MATERIAL GENERAL 1. PLANTS SHALL BE NURSERY GROWN IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOOD HORTICULTURAL PRACTICES UNDER CLIMATIC CONDITIONS SIMILAR TO OR MORE SEVERE THAN THOSE OF THE PROJECT SITE. 2. PLANTS SHALL BE TRUE TO SPECIES AND VARIETY OR SUBSPECIES. NO CULTIVARS OR NAMED VARIETIES SHALL BE USED UNLESS SPECIFIED AS SUCH. QUANTITIES SEE PLANT LIST ON ACCOMPANYING PLANS AND PLANT SCHEDULES. ROOT TREATMENT 1. CONTAINER GROWN PLANTS (INCLUDES PLUGS): PLANT ROOT BALLS MUST HOLD TOGETHER WHEN THE PLANT IS REMOVED FROM THE POT, EXCEPT THAT A SMALL AMOUNT OF LOOSE SOIL MAY BE ON THE TOP OF THE ROOTBALL. 2. PLANTS MUST NOT BE ROOT -BOUND; THERE MUST BE NO CIRCLING ROOTS PRESENT IN ANY PLANT INSPECTED. 3. ROOTBALLS THAT HAVE CRACKED OR BROKEN WHEN REMOVED FROM THE CONTAINER SHALL BE REJECTED. PLANTING & MITIGATION NOTES SCALE: NTS MITIGATION NOTES TALBOT MITIGATION PLAN PSE ENERGIZE EASTSIDE 230 - RENTON EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PSE'S ENERGIZE EASTSIDE PROJECT (THE PROJECT) PROPOSES TO UPGRADE EXISTING TRANSMISSION LINES IN RENTON IN ORDER TO INCREASE TRANSMISSION SYSTEM CAPACITY TO 230KV POWER. PROJECT ELEMENTS, EXISTING CONDITIONS, MITIGATION SEQUENCING, AND PROJECT IMPACTS TO CRITICAL AREAS ARE DISCUSSED IN THE CITY OF RENTON CRITICAL AREAS REPORT (RENTON CAR) PREPARED BY THE WATERSHED COMPANY, JANUARY 2019. THIS MITIGATION PLAN IS INTENDED TO REPRESENT THE MITIGATION PLAN REFERENCED IN THE RENTON CAR. IT HAS BEEN DESIGNED TO APPROPRIATELY MITIGATE FOR PROJECT IMPACTS OCCURRING IN WETLAND AND STREAM CRITICAL AREA BUFFERS AS DESCRIBED IN THE RENTON CAR AND REQUIRED BY THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE (RMC). PROPOSED PROJECT ACTIVITIES IMPACT WETLAND AND STREAM BUFFERS IN THREE POSSIBLE WAYS: PERMANENT IMPACTS RESULTING IN A CONVERSION TO A DEVELOPED CONDITION AS A RESULT OF POLE FOOTPRINTS, VEGETATION CONVERSION FROM A FORESTED VEGETATION TYPE TO A SHRUB OR HERBACEOUS COMMUNITY DUE TO VEGETATION MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS (CONVERSION), AND/OR TEMPORARY IMPACTS ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES (TEMPORARY). TEMPORARY IMPACTS WILL BE RESTORED IN PLACE AFTER CONSTRUCTION WORK IS COMPLETE. CONVERSION AND PERMANENT BUFFER IMPACTS REQUIRE MITIGATION WHICH IS PRESENTED HEREIN. THE PROJECT HAS AVOIDED ALL DIRECT PERMANENT IMPACTS (FILL) TO WETLANDS, STREAMS AND STREAM BUFFERS. ONE NEW POLE WILL BE INSTALLED WITHIN A WETLAND BUFFER AND THREE REPLACEMENT POLES WILL BE INSTALLED IN THE SAME LOCATION AS EXISTING POLES WITHIN A WETLAND BUFFER, BUT WITH A LARGER FOOTPRINT. TWO EXISTING TRANSMISSION POLES WILL BE REMOVED FROM WETLAND BUFFER, RESULTING IN AN OVERALL NET INCREASE OF ONLY 68 SF OF FILL MATERIAL IN BUFFER AREAS. VEGETATION CONVERSION (TREE REMOVAL) IMPACTS OCCUR IN THE BUFFER AREA OF THREE WETLAND AND THREE STREAM FEATURES AND ARE NECESSARY TO ACCOMMODATE THE NEW 230KV TRANSMISSION LINE DESIGN AND MEET FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS. MITIGATION FOR IMPACTS IS PLANNED IN THE BUFFER OF WETLAND NRO1 IN THE LOWER CEDAR RIVER SUB -BASIN (TALBOT SITE). AS DISCUSSED IN THE RENTON CAR, THIS LOCATION WAS SELECTED FOR MITIGATION ACTIVITIES BASED UPON THE LOCATION OF PROJECT IMPACTS, OPPORTUNITY PRESENT, PROPERTY OWNERSHIP, PROXIMITY TO OTHER REGULATED CRITICAL AREAS, AND THE VALUE OF THE ENHANCMENT TO OVERALL CRITICAL AREA FUNCTION IN THE CORRIDOR. ADDITIONALLY, SNAG CREATION IS PROPOSED IN THE BUFFER OF HONEY DEW CREEK TO MITIGATE FOR SOME IMPACTS TO HABITAT OCCURING WITHIN THE MAY CREEK SUB -BASIN. THE MINIMUM MITIGATION AREA REQUIRED, AS PRESENTED IN THE RENTON CAR IS 9,461 SF. THIS WAS CALCULATED BASED ON A PERMANENT IMPACT MITIGATION RATIO OF 1:1 AND A VEGETATION CONVERSION MITIGATION RATIO OF 0.5:1 BASED ON ECOLOGY GUIDANCE. A TOTAL AREA OF APPROXIMATELY 9,500 SF OF DEGRADED BUFFER WILL BE ENHANCED ON THE TALBOT SITE. THE ENHANCEMENT AREAS INCLUDE INVASIVE SPECIES REMOVAL AND INSTALLATION OF NATIVE TREES, SHRUBS, AND GROUNDCOVER PLANTS. nv�Rvi��ni THE MITIGATION PLAN CONSISTS OF APPROXIMATELY 9,500 SF OF WETLAND NRO1 BUFFER ENHANCEMENT ON THE TALBOT SITE, PLUS SNAG AND HINGE -CUT TREE CREATION IN THE BUFFER OF HONEY DEW CREEK. THE MITIGATION PLAN INCLUDES A COMPREHENSIVE FIVE-YEAR MAINTENANCE AND MONITORING PLAN, PER RMC 4-3-50.L.3. THE PLAN SPECIFIES APPROPRIATE SPECIES FOR PLANTING AND PLANTING TECHNIQUES, DESCRIBES PROPER MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES, AND SETS FORTH PERFORMANCE STANDARDS TO BE MET YEARLY DURING MONITORING. THESE SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS WILL ENSURE THAT ENHANCEMENT/RESTORATION PLANTINGS WILL BE MAINTAINED, MONITORED, AND SUCCESSFULLY ESTABLISHED WITHIN THE FIRST FIVE YEARS FOLLOWING IMPLEMENTATION. BUFFER ENHANCEMENT WILL INCLUDE REMOVAL OF INVASIVE SPECIES, INSTALLATION OF NATIVE TREES, SHRUBS, AND GROUNDCOVER, AND CREATION OF HABITAT SNAGS AND HINGE -CUT TREES FROM SUITABLE TREES PROPOSED FOR REMOVAL FROM THE HONEY DEW CREEK BUFFER THESE MITIGATION ACTIVITIES ARE INTENDED TO INCREASE NATIVE PLANT COVER, DECREASE INVASIVE SPECIES PREVALENCE, IMPROVE NATIVE SPECIES DIVERSITY, AND PROVIDE FOOD AND OTHER HABITAT RESOURCES FOR WILDLIFE. 1 OF2 GOALS 1. ENHANCE DEGRADED CRITICAL AREA BUFFER. a. ESTABLISH DENSE AND DIVERSE VEGETATION COMMUNITIES THROUGHOUT THE MITIGATION AREA. b. INCREASE SPECIAL HABITAT FEATURES IN BUFFER AREAS THROUGH CREATION OF HABITAT SNAGS AND HINGE -CUT TREES. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (TALBOT SITE) THE STANDARDS LISTED BELOW WILL BE USED TO JUDGE THE SUCCESS OF THE PLAN OVER TIME. IF THE STANDARDS ARE MET AT THE END OF THE FIVE-YEAR MONITORING PERIOD, THE CITY SHALL RELEASE THE PERFORMANCE BOND. 2 THE WATERSHED COMPANY 750 Sixth Street South Kirkland WA 98033 425.822.5242 www.watershedco.com Science & Design 1. SURVIVAL: a. 100% SURVIVAL OF ALL INSTALLED WOODY VEGETATION AT THE END OF YEAR 0 Lo 1, STARTING FROM THE DATE OF SUBSTANTIALLY COMPLETE INSTALLATION. fr co THIS STANDARD MAY BE MET THROUGH ESTABLISHMENT OF INSTALLED w � PLANTS OR BY REPLANTING AS NECESSARY TO ACHIEVE THE REQUIRED z U-) NUMBERS. O LU MO b. 80% SURVIVAL OF ALL INSTALLED WOODY VEGETATION AT THE END OF YEAR 0 CN 2. THIS STANDARD MAY BE MET THROUGH ESTABLISHMENT OF INSTALLED LV O PLANTS OR BY REPLANTING AS NECESSARY TO ACHIEVE THE REQUIRED z Q+ z Q N NUMBERS. h < It - LO i. SURVIVAL BEYOND YEAR 2 IS DIFFICULT TO TRACK. THEREFORE, DIVERSITY J O w M LO LO O AND COVER STANDARDS ARE PROPOSED IN PLACE OF SURVIVAL (SEE U)~ 00 BELOW). I --I � U) coz wQ Q O 2. NATIVE VEGETATION COVER IN PLANTED AREA: w � O� a. ACHIEVE AT LEAST 60% COVER OF NATIVE SHRUBS BY THE END OF YEAR 3. LV T z TRANSMISSION LINE -FRIENDLY NATIVE VOLUNTEER SPECIES MAY COUNT O Q N O 0 TOWARD THIS STANDARD. r q) z b. ACHIEVE AT LEAST 80% COVER OF NATIVE SHRUBS BY THE END OF YEAR 5. �-I LO W TRANSMISSION LINE -FRIENDLY NATIVE VOLUNTEER SPECIES MAY COUNT -C O Lu M 0C TOWARD THIS STANDARD. LL z O 3. SPECIES DIVERSITY IN PLANTED AREAS: �j Q W N W U a. ESTABLISH AT LEAST FOUR NATIVE SHRUB SPECIES, BY W fr J YEAR 5. TRANSMISSION LINE -FRIENDLY NATIVE VOLUNTEER SPECIES MAY Lij U COUNT TOWARD THIS STANDARD. "ESTABLISHMENT" IS CONSIDERED TO BE AT F-�i 0- C) LEAST FOUR HEALTHY, INDIVIDUAL PLANTS OF A GIVEN SPECIES PRESENT w Q WITHIN THE MITIGATION AREAS. 4. INVASIVE SPECIES STANDARD: NO MORE THAN 20% COVER OF INVASIVE SPECIES IN THE PLANTING AREA IN ANY MONITORING YEAR, EXCEPT SHALL NOT EXCEED 10% COVER AT THE END OF YEAR 5. INVASIVE SPECIES ARE DEFINED AS ANY CLASS A, B, OR C NOXIOUS WEEDS AS LISTED BY THE KING COUNTY NOXIOUS WEED CONTROL BOARD. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION © Copyright- The Watershed Company W z O W w 06 W J Q m D W m�_j z 0- 0 Z �o 00 LU~ o � 00 T W N Q 06 0 o 0 in SHEET SIZE: ORIGINAL PLAN IS 22" x 34". SCALE ACCORDINGLY. PROJECT MANAGER: JC W z DESIGNED: LM DRAFTED: LM CHECKED: JC/MF JOB NUMBER: m 111103.11 W Z SHEET NUMBER: a 5 OF6Q 0 W W 0 U) Cn Q W W N W z W I W W U) TALBOT MITIGATION NOTES MONITORING METHODS THIS MONITORING PROGRAM IS DESIGNED TO TRACK THE SUCCESS OF THE MITIGATION SITE OVER TIME BY MEASURING THE DEGREE TO WHICH THE PERFORMANCE STANDARDS LISTED ABOVE ARE BEING MET. A FIVE YEAR MONITORING PERIOD IS PROPOSED, CONSISTENT WITH THE METHODS OUTLINED IN RMC 4-3-501.3. PER RMC 4-3-501.3, SHOULD THE MITIGATION PROJECT FAIL TO MEET ESTABLISHED SUCCESS CRITERIA AT ANY POINT, THE MONITORING PERIOD SHALL BE STARTED OVER AT YEAR ONE. THE ADMINISTRATOR SHALL HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO MODIFY OR EXTEND THE MONITORING PERIOD AND REQUIRE ADDITIONAL MONITORING REPORTS FOR UP TO TEN (10) YEARS WHEN ANY OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY: A. THE PROJECT DOES NOT MEET THE PERFORMANCE STANDARDS IDENTIFIED IN THE MITIGATION PLAN; B. THE PROJECT DOES NOT PROVIDE ADEQUATE REPLACEMENT FOR THE FUNCTIONS AND VALUES OF THE IMPACTED CRITICAL AREA; C. THE PROJECT INVOLVES ESTABLISHMENT OF FORESTED PLANT COMMUNITIES, WHICH REQUIRE LONGER TIME FOR ESTABLISHMENT. MONITORING OF THE MITIGATION SITE AND ASSOCIATED MONITORING REPORTS WILL BE CONDUCTED/PREPARED BY A RESTORATION SPECIALIST AND SUBMITTED TO THE CITY FOR REVIEW. 1. AN AS -BUILT PLAN AND REPORT WILL BE PREPARED WITHIN 30 DAYS OF SUBSTANTIALLY COMPLETE INSTALLATION OF THE MITIGATION AREA. THE AS -BUILT PLAN WILL DOCUMENT CONFORMANCE WITH THESE PLANS AND WILL DISCLOSE ANY SUBSTITUTIONS OR OTHER NON -CRITICAL DEPARTURES. FOR THE TALBOT SITE, THE AS -BUILT PLAN WILL ESTABLISH BASELINE PLANT INSTALLATION QUANTITIES, PHOTO POINTS, MONITORING TRANSECTS, AND SURVEY PLOTS THAT WILL BE USED THROUGHOUT THE MONITORING PERIOD TO MEASURE THE PERFORMANCE STANDARDS. FOR THE HONEY DEW CREEK SITE, THE AS -BUILT SHOULD NOTE THE CREATION OF ALL HABITAT TREES, AS WELL AS ANY DEVIATIONS FROM THIS PLAN SET. 2. FOR THE FIRST YEAR FOLLOWING INSTALLATION, MONITORING REPORTS SHALL BE SUBMITTED QUARTERLY TO THE CITY FOR THE TALBOT SITE. THEREAFTER ANNUAL REPORTS FOR THE TALBOT SITE SHALL BE SUBMITTED AT THE END OF THE GROWING SEASON (YEARS 2-5). ANNUAL MONITORING REPORTS WILL INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: a. SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS/SPRING VISITS. b. PLANT SURVIVAL AND/OR MORTALITY IN MITIGATION AREAS. c. CALCULATION OF NATIVE SPECIES COVER IN SURVEY PLOTS USING THE POINT -FRAME METHOD AND ALONG TRANSECTS USING THE LINE -INTERCEPT METHOD. d. ESTIMATES OF NATIVE SPECIES COVER SITE WIDE. e. INVASIVE SPECIES COVER AT SURVEY PLOTS AND ALONG TRANSECTS AND ESTIMATED SITE WIDE. f. COUNTS OF ESTABLISHED NATIVE SPECIES TO DETERMINE SPECIES RICHNESS. g. PHOTOGRAPHIC DOCUMENTATION AT PERMANENT PHOTOPOINTS. h. INTRUSIONS INTO THE PLANTING AREAS, EROSION, VANDALISM, TRASH, AND OTHER ACTIONS DETRIMENTAL TO THE OVERALL HEALTH OF THE MITIGATION AREAS. i. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR MAINTENANCE IN THE MITIGATION AREAS. j. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR REPLACEMENT OF ALL DEAD OR DYING PLANT MATERIAL WITH SAME OR LIKE SPECIES AND NUMBER AS ON THE APPROVED PLAN. 3. SPRING MONITORING IS RECOMMENDED EARLY IN EACH GROWING SEASON IN YEARS 2 THROUGH 5 TO NOTIFY THE OWNER AND/OR MAINTENANCE CREWS OF NECESSARY EARLY SEASON MAINTENANCE. RECOMMENDATIONS WILL BE ISSUED IN A SPRING MEMO AND WILL NOT BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY. CONSTRUCTION NOTES AND SPECIFICATIONS GENERALNOTES THE RESTORATION SPECIALIST WILL OVERSEE THE FOLLOWING: 1. TREE SNAGGING AND HINGE -CUTTING. 2. INVASIVE WEED CLEARING AND SITE PREPARATION; AND 3. PLANT MATERIAL INSPECTION. a. PLANT DELIVERY INSPECTION. b. 50% PLANT INSTALLATION/LAYOUT INSPECTION. c. 100% PLANT INSTALLATION INSPECTION. WORK SEQUENCE 1. HABITAT FEATURE CREATION: a. SNAG DESIGNATED TREES ACCORDING TO PLAN DETAIL B, SHEET 4, AND CONSISTENT WITH RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE ASSOCIATED GEOTECHNICAL REPORT. i. TREES SHOULD BE ACCESSED BY FOOT. ii. SNAG TOPS SHOULD BE PLACED PERPENDICULAR TO THE SLOPE, OR ROUGHLY PARALLEL TO THE SLOPE CONTOUR, IN A STABLE POSITION. iii. REMAINING TREE DEBRIS SHOULD BE SCATTERED UPSLOPE OF THE BUFFER AREA NEARBY. b. HINGE -CUT DESIGNATED TREES ACCORDING TO PLAN DETAIL A, SHEET 4. 2. CLEAR THE PLANTING AREA OF ALL INVASIVE WOODY VEGETATION INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO HIMALAYAN BLACKBERRY. PULL OTHER HERBACEOUS INVASIVE VEGETATION AS ENCOUNTERED (E.G., REED CANARYGRASS, HERB ROBERT). 3. INSTALL EROSION CONTROLS SUCH AS WATTLES OR JUTE MAT AS DETERMINED NECESSARY IN COORDINATION WITH GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT. 4. PREPARE SOIL PER DETAIL F, SHEET 4. 5. INSTALL PLANTING AREAS: a. LAYOUT VEGETATION TO BE INSTALLED PER THE PLANTING PLAN AND PLANT SCHEDULE WITH CONSIDERATION OF PLANT SPECIES GROWING CONDITIONS. b. PREPARE A PLANTING PIT FOR EACH PLANT AND INSTALL PER THE PLANTING DETAILS. INSTALL PLANTS DURING DORMANT SEASON (OCTOBER 15TH/ TO MARCH 15TH/). c. MULCH EACH PLANT WITH A CIRCULAR WOOD CHIP MULCH RING, 4 INCHES THICK AND EXTENDING 9 INCHES FROM THE BASE OF THE PLANT (18-INCH DIAMETER). IF THERE ARE LOTS OF INVASIVE PLANTS REMOVED, BLANKET MULCH THE AREA. MAINTAIN THREE INCH GAP BETWEEN MULCH AND PLANT STEM. d. SCHEDULE WATERING TRUCK TO PROVIDE AT LEAST ONE INCH OF WATER PER WEEK, AS NECESSARY, FROM JUNE 1ST/ TO SEPTEMBER 30TH/ FOR AT LEAST TWO SUMMERS AFTER INITIAL PLANT INSTALLATION. ALTERNATIVE WATERING METHODS (E.G., GATOR BAGS) MAY BE UTILIZED WITH APPROVAL FROM THE RESTORATION SPECIALIST. MAINTENANCE MITIGATION PLAN AREAS SHALL BE MAINTAINED FOR FIVE YEARS FOLLOWING COMPLETION OF THE INITIAL PLANT AND SEED INSTALLATION. 1. ROUTINE MAINTENANCE OF TALBOT PLANTING AREAS: a. AT LEAST TWICE YEARLY, REMOVE BY HAND ALL COMPETING WEEDS AND WEED ROOTS FROM BENEATH EACH INSTALLED PLANT AND ANY DESIRABLE VOLUNTEER VEGETATION TO A DISTANCE OF 12 INCHES FROM THE MAIN PLANT STEM. WEEDING SHOULD OCCUR AS NEEDED DURING THE SPRING AND SUMMER. FREQUENT WEEDING WILL RESULT IN LOWER MORTALITY AND LOWER PLANT REPLACEMENT COSTS. b. DO NOT WEED THE AREA NEAR THE PLANT BASES WITH STRING TRIMMER (WEED WHACKER). NATIVE WOODY PLANTS ARE EASILY DAMAGED OR KILLED, AND WEEDS EASILY RECOVER AFTER TRIMMING. c. DURING REGULAR WEED MAINTENANCE EFFORTS (FOCUSED AROUND INSTALLED VEGETATION), ALSO GRUB OUT ANY INVASIVE SPECIES PRESENT IN DESIGNATED MITIGATION AREAS AND REMOVE FROM THE SITE. d. APPLY SLOW -RELEASE, PHOSPHOROUS -FREE, GRANULAR FERTILIZER TO EACH INSTALLED PLANT ANNUALLY IN THE SPRING (BY JUNE 1) OF YEARS 2 THROUGH 5. e. MULCH THE WEEDED AREAS BENEATH EACH PLANT WITH WOOD CHIP MULCH AS NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN A MINIMUM 4-INCH-THICK, 18-INCH-DIAMETER MULCH RING. f. ENSURE PLANTS RECEIVE A MINIMUM OF ONE INCH OF WATER PER WEEK, AS NEEDED, FROM JUNE 1ST/ THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30TH/ FOR THE FIRST TWO YEARS FOLLOWING INSTALLATION. THE MOST FEASIBLE IRRIGATION OPTION FOR THE SITE IS EXPECTED TO BE USE OF A WATERING TRUCK. IRRIGATION BEYOND THE SECOND YEAR MAY BE NEEDED BASED ON SITE PERFORMANCE OR SIGNIFICANT REPLANTING. g. FOLLOW ADDITIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS NOTED IN THE SPRING OR ANNUAL MONITORING SITE VISIT. h. AS DIRECTED, INSTALL REPLACEMENT PLANTS DURING THE UPCOMING DORMANT SEASON (OCTOBER 15TH/ TO MARCH 15TH/) TO ENSURE AN 80% SURVIVAL RATE. CONTINGENCY PLAN PER RMC 4-3-050.L.2,. A SURETY DEVICE IS REQUIRED TO ENSURE THE APPLICANT'S COMPLIANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE MITIGATION AGREEMENT. THE DEVICE SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS SET FORTH IN RMC 4-3-0501.2. PLANTING & MITIGATION NOTES (2 OF 2 SCALE: NTS MATERIALS 1. COMPOST: SHALL MEET WSDOT STANDARDS SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROAD, BRIDGE, AND MUNICIPAL CONSTRUCTION, 9-14.4(8) FOR FINE COMPOST. 2. FERTILIZER (FOR NEAR AQUATIC ENVIRONMENTS): SLOW -RELEASE, PHOSPHOROUS -FREE GRANULAR FERTILIZER. LABEL MUST INDICATE THAT PRODUCT IS SAFE FOR AQUATIC ENVIRONMENTS. FOLLOW MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE. KEEP FERTILIZER IN WEATHER -TIGHT CONTAINER WHILE ON -SITE. FERTILIZER IS ONLY TO BE APPLIED IN YEARS TWO AND THREE, NOT IN YEAR ONE. 3. RESTORATION SPECIALIST: THE WATERSHED COMPANY [(425) 822-5242] PERSONNEL OR OTHER PERSON QUALIFIED TO EVALUATE ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION PROJECTS. 4. WOOD CHIP MULCH: "ARBORIST CHIPS" (CHIPPED WOODY MATERIAL) APPROXIMATELY ONE TO THREE INCHES IN MAXIMUM DIMENSION (NOT SAWDUST). THIS MATERIAL IS COMMONLY AVAILABLE IN LARGE QUANTITIES FROM ARBORISTS OR TREE -PRUNING COMPANIES. MULCH SHALL NOT CONTAIN APPRECIABLE QUANTITIES OF GARBAGE, PLASTIC, METAL, SOIL, AND DIMENSIONAL LUMBER OR CONSTRUCTION/DEMOLITION DEBRIS. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION © Copyright- The Watershed Company THE WATERSHED COMPANY 750 Sixth Street South Kirkland WA 98033 425.822.5242 www.watershedco.com Science & Design V Lo co CD �j W � O z CD M--I W N � C) W o z z 0 N O M U ~ Lo 00 I� U)o rn z 0W Q co -� W 0 0� � w r z Q�N o O OMz `o W -OwM0� W � LL N p� p W N W J ^� Q W w 0— 0� W Q m_j U) z O co > w 06 z J J Q z O_ 1---_ �o � a m U 0 C/) �z co o 00 T w C) Q00 r-i o 0 'Oil SHEET SIZE: ORIGINAL PLAN IS 22" x 34". SCALE ACCORDINGLY. PROJECT MANAGER: JC w Z DESIGNED: LM LL DRAFTED: LM CHECKED: JC/MF JOB NUMBER: m 111103.11 Z SHEET NUMBER: a 6 OF6 Q 0