Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA99-028 a © CITY OF RENTON ,f ��-.. °: .r, = �^--- ••LL +1; "' if \ �.-��' y ^"Planning/Building/Public Works Y- 1055 South Grady Way - Renton Washington 98055 c' �'S'R ` '�y `� - 3 0 5 ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED 4 Q•4. 0.4 . w 1 _.S.tijA. ji$!Es4•#OtAII.I.= ,S20- bb . .The Boeing Company PO Box 1303 Seattle;WA 98124 #082305 9187 06 NOT DELIVERABLE ova, AS ADDRESSED UNABLE TO FORWARD RETURN TO SENDER , �':�2.-2. 11,1„1„1,11„„1,1„1,1„,11,1 I,i,i„1,1,,,11,,,1i!„II,,,I,1,1+1„I,I,II1„i • _I_ 1 I • IOk0011N 0L7VY.IqW®WSHNGIW STAR C MMIES.NCR.200E WD 83(91) Bfx0YVM5 - B�� ��-- • �` N E,6111 „u1,O 50NRF AT RAE SW COWIER OF MEl EAO OF IT HIN -, RY EIfVA'00 M STRUCTURE �=` �- - 1.011.1... u5.wY CORPS Of[NORM 0*00 CMII[008 LOCKS MIW. wOF CONC.000C WL 19'SOU1N Of SY C%XER OF 9DG.-81. SIlO(„LR DINw ow )`-_�i y { - `y E 53-12OWTE6 WATER SNFACE ELEVATORS FOR W E YASm1LIO0 NR AS FERMIS EIEV.rig! '-93 11708 PIPE EL[YA110x b r. FIRE HYDRANT YDRANT viL i \�-- \`\\ 'WO 2• 1 2 25' SO' MX WI A R.I..W1 IS!TO FEe.15TH=11.W BY 2 OHLE0 SOU.AI NORM 10P 4r COW 50Ru NWI01E • vAAVE R WATER F.uNE EALVATw I A+\ --. ' 411&'7-°- � WY WRI ELV.01.FEB.•51„10 Wf 151 El(y 1..50 •I' POST...TOR wLVE Koff POW/ruBOR AME 1 LI ` �tSCAIf W FEET10 CUxi CO„C. CONCREI( AC ASPHLT PONCRREO1J /riT\ `` RI LO0LS ail' wlnw 101 001 K'Z,DAWN 19M IWW]9l 0ED C0(Dw ulE',PE BEUM SUER SuRFACE TEFL ux[ \ / / •~•" \ -5 PACs YB ff[T AMgi a M L(Pilfi OLiw VYO foR• BOfr1G WS[ CO„IOw 1x1EMu= PN P051 MExf.W.LW //// \ \ D YWS ANl IK MOM Ahl ROOD SILOI[S OF 1992,HD 1996. ON STAIC LRWND A4/�/ // 1.=-� '• - ry.R4P B:\\ `� 4` ROUT.POUT TO CONARI MK 10 Wpdi(91)9O1[„IRE IRE NI SOW �'-INTER lwE �BETE O1xG uxE 'K.".../i(�! /\� J//�/llll y . . Mx M BSE PONT KM ACN r.l.)g1,..505 t=k6.1p615 Ow CON,-B!96) ^1?A-BOFJGNR [PROPERtt urt -Pm- RECORD DR.A. \0'�'..44/i z.�/2l/I , . 1.., •\\4 10 AGp A.1,3006.1.,I2 1.1%.130.9.THEN ROTA,BARE FA[AT THE M:AIpN PONTTN-�- iW TOP OF WALL[LLVAT1:1 �: '/')a.��i lll \ o �\ `" Os•c0ux1[Rnacx WISE • WET SOLLARO SAIL wm unAl co. FORCE MAIN \5�:�/ ` //I Zj », iiir�� ` ��� -�`, NOTES 6 CENTERLINE AIRCRAFT TOW PATH 6 • \ PROPERTY ONES SWAN HEREON WERE ESIA0l15„[O FIT R[N[RS RELO2IEV "'PHI' =OOCA 1 �_t--JI/A% T ET.CAP \ RrP�`���\ - 17-� J/I ' \� \.2__T��_��� FRO.THE 1%5,KKnM 0[xrPS.w0 A550Cu1[S.NC MMY.YD ANVEt /•V --_ / �• .1 ,_ \ -- IMS FLROKD FOR IRE F(Pul OF uN[WAS..Sx Pfl.wpS'NRD:956 I8;___/ // JI I T -._4•• ` \I %•: S O.NYPNT/H.08 LooAf/ON"/Z D Nua0ER 4y /-iA • U• \ ` \"�:: %A'. NET.CAP ON E47E4,aF RiF RAP // aKAir ���i� - . SHEET PILE SALE I�{ '4 / '� 1 .' LAKE WASHINGTON ....0 AL....EA.r PdE watt- ' a '� % >Y - LAKE WASHINGTON '�• 'L�" �-��Z� y, 4 � .-c,,,,i �___ �•r 41P S Erp2� •4, Q / • x1�" , NCN,MRR 4O y M. ��il"PPE Np '.8`1•SRE��JPRR'o"h`) 2Ngq R�MOV�Ot1.(I-^ep) ®DaARN C�,t,• , •4' 48•CONC SgMASTORM AT NONIH''lOP N I \,,+ i CO 3iMC S CIF A17 - ' 1 • - 64' '4, EIEV 2450 %4 y"b W,, .•. �:`••"^ O imin a 7P.• �N iiyx.,,,,__ �'4..4p s.A. QE ,4, Q, 4„ /\ ' W �e1 �• �,....it ` ���\ �I R •1 ` �'"°"u TwF.aO,w. e .6., '4�xO•a@'W \ ti0 R9P. 1 �4 wife Of-x•- w ry 'U Cabe oa, Arir.1 'P p, .. 'R'►l. ) DOLPHIN .......................................... • 2:, •�;- 1 � / .Ayr II ili wuaDcx Epywl ca-b RIM!4SU UTILITY VAULT 1 I• INV!£21.47 W SUMP PUMP o6 - •F: .y O - fr T. ' INV MN E1.22 $ RIM 24.27 wr_� �•.\; aO•,AO aIl�o yII • ROT H.1D INV NW z,.J] _ 'sir "WA,,.,. ` y aF "w'f ? Il %! 1'�jI 1 -ter - °�,�"\ i' �� c•' yl ���'r{)`I -13 ClEI11] EU"E J \ At.- ♦ _ <�mY^I w W 2 '- RM ttPNE-4 5-...T. ry�' -' DOLPHIN IOND;FT-410• w J EL ffa.R3 -1@ 4'� ,.r f. SHUFFLEiON PI I�� i ,..�,r'�_ :)8+-� /"'• -CR-PRD � I1 'Po 6 �UGEi SOUND �.. � ' \ CMC,EiE �iLM�g J r� '' +.y F5„( - -_. �! TOP 23.57 PRD 11 T.§ 'R. . +���, ,XTF/r EWER rr LICK Co. 44•.i LINE y _n�. �. z /----- _ -- a. 1. ;y.,:... ••ik. OF Alf'RAP m1R44 ! ,111 mnORs lk ��1, ` "r�i�t ;' 1 1N 28 SAW R 1 8 �• �i r� I DOLPHIN �r e, ..,•%1�,.// /� 2-SEIEL. '1; T P'V�4" , 1 ' • CIOr lOw PAIN • \RS 7 Y �L.IP\\\ II 4. LE NR No.455 " �� &,�/ 4 L "',jR�U\ \39?3 IT cue C A i , �// SbAH-G-IB A S ::, I�P// OJ-01 I m:��w�� \ 7T-IE RIM 5521.E F _ ! L Ey'�$�A�'�tif'� �ON� __-__ INV SW 21.E II yl ll�%/ 0.rt11(51NG C VA�--�D- INV W 21.0 _ i A w'� r .A+'I \ 12-CNf OVIFA L.../.: INV N 20.8 R.`,2y7 14, %' -/J� i_2�jP4 INV E 20.8 /0• �7a'i�_`- -Jf -la�_% \ ri 21.3 20.8 `/M yY {W�L ` !t �r ___N�'15-•'9 4. 1 l \-16 f(NrREIE N0.{17 /'` ,. 43..... ,,4oE^yyi 50MH-6D 1111111111tl111 ice/ 02-01' xOUTF16. No.25 TRAILROAD RACKS•� TOP 23]i a INV 16.82 TRACKS , WE 2191 '4. HMS lUNDER WATER 1 BBI' ROTATION POINT / '9 IA'� SEE ABOVE - • Aa �'' F-/c(ARE 4 BOEING BUILDING • 4-(AZ I Ny AF•Ter Mode Laq„ws A.w E/\ / 65,OYT aG RAP RAP \/ / •+1 DIPCNAYCE CNA,ANE2- / SURVEYING & MAPPING BY SHUE 7P✓P R P lO r �'�'^�'^• 0=50 00o. PO'.8 SC.sN.y/w 9[r-1000.=Vf0 1 _ .. . . _. _ - I P5E - C_„.L Scf_e o,_„ T]F(or�ti., S OA• , -- 7,442 LPPSE IbxD 6NEFTl64..6_ 2,-..c./x. •2 5 c bs Burlington Northern Santa Fe The Boeing Company 1700 E Golf Road#400 PO Box 3707 Schaumburg,IL 60173 Seattle,WA 98124 #052305 9003 01,#082305 9027 00 #072305 9001 01,#082305 9011 08 Puget Sound Energy The Boeing Company PO Box 90868 PO Box 3703 Bellevue,WA 98009 Seattle,WA 98124 #082305 9056 04,#082305 9057 03,#334450 0006 02 #082305 9079 07,#082305 9204 05 The Boeing Company City of Renton PO Box 1303 1055 South Grady Way Seattle,WA 98124 Renton,Washington 98055 #082305 9187 06 • #334450 0775 01 City of Rento 1 5 Sou dy Way ., Rento ashington 98055 y ., #334 0 0 Burlington Northern Santa Fe 1700 E. Golf Road, #400 Schaumburg, IL 60173 Parcel#'s 052305 9003 01, 082305 9027 00 The Boeing Company P.O. Box 3707 Seattle, WA 98124 Parcel#'s 072305 9001 01, 082305 9011 08 The Boeing Company P.O. Box 3703 Seattle, WA 98124 Parcel#'s 082305 9079 07, 082305 9204 05 The Boeing Company P.O. Box 1303 Seattle, WA 98111 Parcel#082305 9187 06 City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Parcel #334450 0775 01 i CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 2i day of OaOber , 1999, I deposited in the mails of the Unit d States, a sealed envelope containing Slnorelt ekemibiicii pevwtk documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing a.c EGolo9� GctAev&t k‘vv‘ L.j ?Letel SoUN ►ne r3, 1aav t d 13o Az_ (1e v3rt . of 11a&tu.4rd_ R esou IT"s (Signature of Sender) S0.V1dvtt -. Se ,r STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that 5.( n�/L0. _ S..ee signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for thd—dses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: /' 13 1 g `1 " 77y ] 7% I--)-,,\_ Notary Public in a for the State of Washi n M:- ILYN KAMCHEFF 1 MARILYN KAMCHEFF NOTARY PUBLIC MyNotary appointment expires: 1,:6- STATE OF WASHINGTON pp p 29433 COMMISSION EXPIRES ,roc 2003 Project :Zt.=. 'Pus �ineley S�re"trtIG RetnnoVal Project Number: LUPt • q� OLD, SWIG NOTARY.DOC • • CITY OF RENTON CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION FROM SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT October 27, 1999 EXEMPTION FILE NO.: LUA-99-028, ECF, SME PROJECT NAME: Puget Sound Energy Sheetpile Removal APPLICANT: Puget Sound Energy Kim Lane - (425) 462-3173 OWNER: Department of Natural Resources David Bortz - (360) 902-1111 x1904550 PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nishihira - (425) 430-7270 PROPOSAL: The applicant, Puget Sound Energy, is proposing to remove an existing sheetpile supported flume located along the Lake Washington Shoreline. The sheetpile, which consists of an outer and inner board supported by cross bracings, currently serves as a bulkhead for the existing shoreline. The project includes the removal of the majority of the canal, 500 feet of the inboard sheetpile and 600 feet of the outboard sheetpile, as well as three adjacent dolphins. Vibratory equipment will used for the removal and will be brought in by barge. The proposal includes the restoration of the shoreline to a more natural condition in order to improve fish habitat near the mouth of the Cedar River. After removal of the sheetpile, approximately 1,600 cubic yards of fill will be moved on the site (2.5 cubic yards of material per foot of shoreline) by use of equipment operated on the shore. The existing material will be sloped to achieve a 2:1 rip rap shoreline at the northeast corner of the site and will transition westward to a restored 2:1, then 3:1 sloped shoreline. Disturbed areas on the site will be seeded and the shoreline will be revegetated as indicated on the revegetation plan and slope details submitted September 22, 1999. A Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated (DNS-M) was issued for the project on March 23, 1999. All mitigation measures imposed on the project have been satisfied. On March 19, 1999, the Department of Fish and Wildlife issued a Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) permit for the project. PROJECT LOCATION: 1101 Lake Washington Blvd North LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See attached. SEC-TWN-R: 8-23N-5E WATER BODY/WETLAND: Lake Washington SME\ An exemption from a Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit is hereby granted on the proposed project described for the following reason(s): X A public or private project, the primary purpose of which is to improve fish or wildlife habitat or fish passage, when all of the following apply: 1. The project has been approved in writing by the Department of Fish and Wildlife as necessary for the improvement of the habitat or passage and appropriately designed and sited to accomplish the intended purpose. 2. The project has received hydraulic project approval by the Department of fish and Wildlife pursuant to chapter 75.20 RCW. 3. The Development Services Division has determined that the project is consistent with this Master Program. The proposed development is consistent or inconsistent with (check one): CONSISTENT INCONSISTENT X Policies of the Shoreline Management Act. The guidelines of the Department of Ecology where no Master Program has been finally approved or adapted by the Department. X The Master Program. J n anson,- irector evelopment Services Division ADVISORY NOTES TO APPLICANT: 1. The applicant is encouraged to locate any possible utilities that may exist in Lake Washington near the subject site before initiating the project, specifically before anchoring any barges. The number for"Call 2-Days Before You Dig" is 1-800-424-5555. Attachments: Legal Description Vicinity Map cc: Applicant File Department of Ecology Attorney General SME\ Legal Description That portion of the Harbor Area according to the Commissioners of Public Lands as shown on the Thi i Supplemental Map of Lake Washington Shore Lands as recorded on September 14, 1965 lying in fron of Section 8, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, and being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the North one-quarter corner of said Section 8, thence North 89° 58' 32" West, along the North line of the Northwest quarter of said Section 8 and the westerly extension thereof, a distance of 1721 40 feet to a concrete monument, thence North 44° 14' 23" West, a distance of 680 06 feet to a point on the Inner Harbor Line of said Lake Washington Shore Lands Map, from which Inner Harbor Angle Point No. 88, bears North 45° 45' 00" East, a distance of 1038.98 feet, said point being a concrt monument, thence South 45°45' 00" West, along said Inner Harbor Line, a distance of 661.86 feet an( the True Point of Beginning; thence continuing South 45°45' 00" West, a distance of 708.53 feet, thence North 44° 15' 00" West, a distance of 326.17 feet; thence North 70° 28' 08" East, a distance of. 780.00 feet, more or less, to the True Point of Beginning. • NEIGHBORHOOD DETAIL MAP 1 �---'; "r. • • I"I 1 1. s., ,.,n11 1-1., ''f- DNR Aquatic Lease Land Sheetpile Removal �' .e\1 , \ . . i� I .. II I ;Fact,,,, \ ' 1.tip \V• 0.'01 I', '.L - Ede \�4( I H ; ' • P! : i['O�eii' 7' ;g .Tr-` .1�,.... pIII, �• i '..l• CL. ,�lit. ,rL=-ern--, 7--r1-- 1 :r 7,D i' 6 0 , V. �y l �.• .. ..- O J p • Zr - ::,..:::,. . n�. q� ',1\'Or •J'' n .d '$ w 1,41•'! 1i.t• Oa •rf -., r 10N 4% 1 :t \ p.` \„ Ill •,• Q ig$,J,01kd 115_ U 'A 'I' 1 �P 0 �� \ \ : 1 ��\ Ho; ' 1 a Ji ill n ttiBI ri H 5 '' 1 A 8.,,, „,, n; . .1 r, i / s[I� co°Lo r[roeu� •l��-c.'' .) :, °.--.J - ' :- •�. � 11 1 • p14E / . N,�-' f.P ® }h ,,•.,'.., . a, � :I:I L /,, AACI. PARR f1 ;I / 1 I . .� .•1 c i• . / I '{�I .. r, +'I ,N. / L.- s - 1 n- - I ,r ' _ / ; N[ • 1•'1 '� ? .. .= aril.' ... �.•/IIF •, ['11_.. I ����,,, ^ ///� .-*/.,,, M • c� - ,..I. 5,,'�G. I- / 5 • t E # ,r [s! �'I. `• t 11 Av'i'N. ,�•' . :. fi / &y / ••+/,'fr.„iffi .•-••A . • 4.CCti tti' r' I / oN 500,E_ANo f./:......?7\/ /.'. / �� r/ ' 1 �7. r P.' ,6, . , n. n ,li u •. i 1 It / -aJ�`� /•,[[ ;i 1� ( !,.w. \ OOM 1! 9, j auei i i• V :J ,`'.. . f L e.. ' % \ .,, \ � i rwr••• H +1 11 { • . .. 1 I . . \ ''', .. ,\ i c i •.- t -:..iit...;.' , \„\ \' ' ,. I s , 0 mos •••••‘N. \\:.------.1' —____ ...._. .._ . .. . \ ‘ \tt\. • i, - li . \I \ . ...\ t • 1 I n • �' l!/ • L.t I I. I '1 1 1 1 li I •\\� .... � ; ria • Is 4\\ 1•�rSLAWru K 1 It f t: e. 1 s 1 ' IIi • I !' it IV,' OF RE TON 1 r r N._In11 . n... • t1 11 .• .-. _.._ _ I _ IIf 1II • ru.. ... 1` iiiiiiii■ N.N 1.n.1 r u.. IAI RP OR 1„' w ij I i 4 ._pI •tU � ti\ 41 -- .....:. (.//-1/,(6. '' i It\ . .,, ail: GENMALOT.DOC • • Leslie Nishihira From: Leslie Betlach To: Leslie Nishihira Subject: RE: PSE Sheet Pile Removal Project; Proj. No. LUA-99-028, ECF, SME Date: Thursday, October 21, 1999 2:00PM Thanks, Lesley From: Leslie Nishihira To: Leslie Betlach Subject: RE: PSE Sheet Pile Removal Project; Proj. No. LUA-99-028, ECF, SME Date: Thursday, October 21, 1999 1:44PM Leslie, Thanks for your comments regarding the revised planting plans. In response to your other question, the "Master Land Use Permit Application" form, which is required for all land use permits, includes the signature of all property owners listed on the title report for the property. In this case, David Bortz of the Department of Natural Resources signed on behalf of the property owner (DNR). This authorizes the work presented under the scope of this application. Let me know if you have any other questions. Thanks, Lesley x7270 From: Leslie Betlach To: Leslie Nishihira Subject: PSE Sheet Pile Removal Project; Proj. No. LUA-99-028, ECF, SME Date: Thursday, October 21, 1999 11:55AM Priority: High Leslie, Thank you for providing the opportunity to review the revised set of drawings for the above-referenced project. The revised plans are approved as submitted. The only question I have is regarding the work on the DNR property. I can only assume that PSE has the right to do so by agreement, easement, etc . Does the City verify this as part of the construction permit process? I would be interested in hearing back on this. Thanks, Leslie x-6619 Page 1 • • CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: October 1, 1999 TO: Leslie Betlach, Parks Division FROM: Lesley Nishihira, Development Services Division SUBJECT: PSE Sheet Pile Removal Project Project No. LUA-99-028, ECF, SME Attached are the revised plans detailing the proposed re-vegetation plan along the shoreline of the site. In addition to clarifying the inconsistencies found on the previous plan, the revisions provide for a three foot buffer between the shoreline plantings and trail location—specifically along the rip rap area. I have also attached copies of previous correspondence for your records. At your earliest convenience, please review the plans and respond with comments, if any, by October 15, 1999. If all issues and concerns have been addressed, the Shoreline Exemption Permit will be issued for the project. If you have any questions or need further information, please contact me at x7270. Thank you. • • • PUG ET DEVELOPMENT PLAN( [% CITY OF RENTDN SOUND ENERGY SEP 1999 RECEIVED September 16, 1999 Lesley Nishihira City of Renton Planning/Building/Public Works Dept 1055 South Grady Way Renton, Washington 98055 Subject: Puget Sound Energy Sheetpile Removal LUA99-028,ECF,SME Dear Lesley, In accordance with your request, please find enclosed three copies the revised drawings for your review titled "Shuffleton Decommissioning; DNR Lease Hold Sheetpile Removal , Sheet 1 Grading Plan, Sheet 2 Details and Sheet 3 Landscape Plan. We have also modified the drawings to maintain a clear zone between the proposed shoreline trail and the proposed tree planting on these drawings. Also enclosed is a copy of the Hydraulic Project Approval received for this project, and a copy of recent correspondence from the Department of the Army responding to out application for this work. The Department of the Army is now requesting that PSE perform a Biological Evaluation. With the delays expected in receiving approval from this agency, it is now expected that this work may not occur until perhaps late next year. I would appreciate if you could indicate if delays of this magnitude will cause any problems with the previously issued Determination of Non-Significance. I hope these drawings meet your requirements and if you have any questions, please do not hesitate to give me a call at(206) 604-5292. Sincerely, Kim Lane Project Manager hYLKAULIC PROJECT PROVE State of Washington R �, � v n _` 20.10g I� Department of Fish and Wild re r e^ Llmmawti/ t `_Q� Region 4 Office �-�` 16018 Mill Creek Boulevard MiU creek,Washington 9801 • 1 A^p 2 A 1999 DATE OF ISSUE: March 19. 1999 p,1iD S I Ut ' J,OG_NUMBER: 00-D8577-01 FERMITTEE AUTHORIZED AGENT OR CONTRACTOR Puget Sound Energy Not Applicable ATTN: Kim Lane,Project Manager 815 Mercer Street,MER-03N Seattle,Washington 98109 (425)462-3173 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Remove Sheet Pile Bulkhead and Restore Shoreline PROJECT LOCATION: Between the Boeing Renton Plant and Puget Sound Energy's Shuffleton Steam Plant, 1101 Lake Washington Boulevard North,Renton,Washington i# WRIA WATER BODY TRIBUTARY TO 1/4 SEC, SEC, TOWNSHIP RANGE COUNTY 1 08.LKWA Lake Washington Ship Canal NW 08 23 North 05 East King PROVISIONS 1. TIMING LIMITATIONS: The project may begin June 16, 1999 and shall be completed by February 1,2001.. provided that,pile removal and shoreline grading below the ordinary high water line(OHWL)shall not occur between February 1 and June 15. 2. Work shall be accomplished per plans and specifications entitled,"SHUFFLETON DECOMMISSIONING-DNF: LEASE HOLD SHEETPILE REMOVAL",dated January 21, 1999,and submitted to the Washington Department f Fish and Wildlife(WDFW),except as modified by this Hydraulic Project Approval. These plans reflect design criteria per Chapter 220-110 WAC. These plans reflect mitigation procedures to significantly reduce or eliminate impacts tq fish resources. A copy of these plans shall be available on site during construction. 3. NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT: The Area Habitat Biologist listed below shall be contacted at least three working days prior to start of work,and again within seven days of completion of shoreline grading and revegetati n to arrange for compliance inspection. 4. Removal of existing structures shall be accomplished so the structures and associated materials do not re-enter the lake. 5. Removal of aquatic vegetation shall be limited to that necessary to gain access to construct the project. 6. Rock used for shoreline armoring shall be composed of clean,angular material of a sufficient size to prevent its b( ng washed away by high water or wave action. 7. All trenches,depressions,or holes created within the OHWL shall be backfilled prior to inundation by high water )r wave action. Page 1 of 3 . Y tYL1iAULIC PROJECT APPROV._ State of Washington � °" W W 4 RC 75.20.100 or RC 75.20.108 Department of Fish and Wi life dp' . wnki.0 t { ' Region 4 Office FISH and 16018 Mill Creek Boalevarc '� Mill Creek,Washington 98( 2 DATE OF ISSUE: March 19. 1999 LOG NUMBER: 00-D8577-01 10. Alteration or disturbance of the shoreline and associated shoreline vegetation shall be limited to that necessary to construct tie project. Within seven calender days of project completion,all disturbed areas shall be protected fror erosion using vegetation or other means. Within one year of project completion,the disturbed areas shall be revegetated with native or other woody species approved by WDFW per Provision 2. Plantings shall be maintains as necessary for three years to ensure 80 percent or greater survival. 11. If at any time,as a result of project activities,fish are observed in distress,a fish kill occurs,or water quality problems develop(including equipment leaks or spills),operations shall cease and the WDFW at(360) 534-8233 ; Id Washington Department of Ecology at(425)649-7000 shall be contacted immediately. Work shall not resume un 1 further approval is given by the WDFW. 12. A floating sedimentation control curtain shall be deployed and maintained in a functional manner to contain suspended sediments at the work site during sheet pile removal and shoreline grading activity. 13. All waste material such as construction debris,silt,excess dirt or overburden resulting from this project shall be deposited above the limits of flood water in an approved upland disposal site. 14. Extreme care shall be taken to ensure that no petroleum products,hydraulic fluid,fresh cement, sediments, sedim, t- laden water,chemicals,or any other toxic or deleterious materials are allowed to enter or leach into the lake. SEPA: DNS by City of Renton,final on March 16, 1999. APPLICATION ACCEPTED: March 17, 1999 ENFORCEMENT OFFICER: Peck 024 [P 1] Larry Fisher (425)649-7042 a L..G. for Director Area Habitat Biologist WDFW GENERAL PROVISIONS This Hydraulic Project Approval(HPA)pertains only to the provisions of the Fisheries Code(RCW 75.20). Additional authorize >n from other public agencies may be necessary for this project. This HPA shall be available on the job site at all times and all its provisions followed by the permittee and operator(s)performing ie work. This HPA does not authorize trespass. The person(s)to whom this HPA is issued may be held liable for any loss or damage to fish life or fish habitat which results from failure to comply with the provisions of this HPA. Failure to comply with the provisions of this Hydraulic Project Approval could result in a civil penalty of up to one hundred dollz.. per day or a gross misdemeanor charge,possibly punishable by fine and/or imprisonment. Page 2 of 3 -- h,CD (ULIC PROJECT APPROVA.. State of Washington di' ' Washington Drys of RCW 75.20.100 or RCW 75.20.108 Department of Fish and Wilc Region 4 Office Fl�aad 16018 Mill Creek Boulevard WILDLIFE Mill Creek,Washington 9801 ; DATE OF ISSUE: March 19. 1999 LOG NUMBER: 00-D8577-01 All HPAs issued pursuant to RCW 75.20.100 or 75.20.160 are subject to additional restrictions,conditions or revocation if the Department of Fish and Wildlife determines that new biological or physical information indicates the need for such action. The permittee has the righf pursuant to Chapter 34.04 RCW to appeal such decisions. All HPAs issued pursuant to RCW 75.20.103 ma be modified by the Department of Fish and Wildlife due to changed conditions after consultation with the permittee: PROVIDED HOWEVER,that such modifications shall be subject to appeal to the Hydraulic Appeals Board established in RCW 75.20.130. APPEALS-GENERAL INFORMATION IF YOU WISH TO APPEAL A DENIAL OF OR CONDITIONS PROVIDED IN A HYDRAULIC PROJECT APPROVAL, THERE ARE INFORMAL AND FORMAL APPEAL PROCESSES AVAILABLE. A. INFORMAL APPEALS (WAC 220-110-340)OF DEPARTMENT ACTIONS TAKEN PURSUANT TO RCW 75.20.100, 75.20.103,75.20.106,AND 75.20.160: A person who is aggrieved or adversely affected by the following Department actions may request an informal review of: (A) The denial or issuance of a HPA,or the conditions or provisions made part of a HPA;or (B) An order imposing civil penalties. It is recommended that an aggrieved party contact the Area Habitat Biologist and discuss the concerns. Most problems are resolved at this level,but if not,you may elevate your concerns to his/her supervisor. A request for an INFORMAL REVIEW shall be in WRITING to the Department of Fish and Wildlife,600 Capitol Way North,Olympia, Washington 98501-1091 and shall be RECEIVED by the Department within 30-days of the denial or issuance of a HPA or receipt of an order imposing civil penalties. The 30-day time requirement may be stayed by the Department if negotiations are occurring between the aggrieved party and the Area Habitat Biologist and/or his/her supervisor. The Habitat Protection Services Division Manager or his/her designee shall conduct a review and recommend a decision to the Director or its designee. If you are not satisfied with the resu. of this informal appeal, a formal appeal may be filed. B. FORMAL APPEALS(WAC 220-110-350)OF DEPARTMENT ACTIONS TAKEN PURSUANT TO RCW 75.20.100 OR 75.20.106: A person who is aggrieved or adversely affected by the following Department actions may request an formal review of: (A) The denial or issuance of a HPA,or the conditions or provisions made part of a HPA; (B) An order imposing civil penalties;or (C) Any other"agency action" for which an adjudicative proceeding is required under the Administrative Procedure Act, Chapter 34.05 RCW. A request for a FORMAL APPEAL shall be in WRITING to the Department of Fish and Wildlife,600 Capitol Way North, Olympia,Washington 98501-1091,shall be plainly labeled as"REQUEST FOR FORMAL APPEAL" and shall be RECEIVEL DURING OFFICE HOURS by the Department within 30-days of the Department action that is being challenged. The time pen ,i for requesting a formal appeal is suspended during consideration of a timely informal appeal. If there has been an informal appeal,the deadline for requesting a formal appeal shall be within 30-days of the date of the Department's written decision in response to the informal appeal. C. FORMAL APPEALS OF DEPARTMENT ACTIONS TAKEN PURSUANT TO RCW 75.20.103 or 75.20.160: A person who is aggrieved or adversely affected by the denial or issuance of a HPA,or the conditions or provisions made part 4 a HPA may request a formal appeal. The request for FORMAL APPEAL shall be in WRITING to the Hydraulic Appeals Board per WAC 259-04 at Environmental Hearings Office,4224 Sixth Avenue SE,Building Two-Rowe Six,Lacey,Washington 98504;telephone 360/459-6327. D. FAILURE TO APPEAL WITHIN THE REQUIRED TIME PERIODS RESULTS IN FORFEITURE OF ALL APPEAL RIGHTS. IF THERE IS NO TIMELY REQUEST FOR AN APPEAL,THE DEPARTMENT ACTION SHALL BE FINAL AND UNAPPEALABLE. Page 3 of 3 • �$T Op 4. .. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY r SEATTLE DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS w `f1f;:=" y P.O. BOX 3755 o z ciF:' t7 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98124-2255 P �'� PC CIS U�P� RAETCEVN TIOO O A U G 3 0 1999 Regulatory Branch la a Ms . Kim Lane, Project Manager Puget Sound Energy 815 Mercer Street, MER-03N Seattle, Washington 98109 Reference : 1999-2-00254 Puget Sound Energy Dear Ms . Lane : The referenced application for a Department of the Army permit for work in Lake Washington at Renton, Washington, has been received. Please cite the referenced number in any correspondence with us concerning this project . In the project vicinity, a number of salmon species have been listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) , effective May 24, 1999 . Under the Corps of Engineer' s Federal permit program, permit applications are reviewed for the potential impact on threatened and endangered species pursuant to Sejction 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) , as amended. The ESA requires that Federal agencies take action as necessary to ensure that they do not authorize, fund, or carry out actions that are likely to jeopardize the continued existence of endangered or threatened species or result in the destruction or adverse modification of critical habitat for such species . The Corps of Engineers, through consultation with the National Marine Fisheries Service and the U.S . Fish and Wildlife Service, must evaluate information on the presence of listed species (including timing and life stages) , habitat for such species or their prey sources, and other parameters . As a consequence of the ESA listings and consultation procedures discussed above, we currently have a large backlog of permit applications . Your application will be processed in the order it is received. To expedite the review of your application, you must submit a Biological Evaluation (BE) prepared by a qualified biologist . Enclosed is a sample BE for a similar project and a list of information for freshwaters that should be included in the BE. The Corps of Engineers must review the potential project . impacts on endangered species for the majority of the permit applications received. We request your patience as we attempt to serve all applicants in as timely and equitable a manner as possible . In addition to the BE requested above, the project drawings must be submitted in the format outlined in our JARPA pamphlet . The drawings must be on 8 . 5 by 11-inch paper and include a proper vicinity map, title blocks, and other information. A drawing checklist is enclosed to assist you in providing the required information. The BE and revised drawings are requested within 45 days of the date of this letter. Additional project information may also be requested after a review of the information requested above. If you have any questions, please contact me at telephone (206 764-6906 . Sincerely, im Green, Project Manager Application Review Section Enclosures 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION NECESSARY TO EXPEDITE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT REVIEW Freshwater Environment 1 . Description of substrate to be dredged, filled, moved, and/or stockpiled onto, or built over (e .g. mud, sand, gravel, cobble, bedrock, other) . 2 . Species and distribution of riparian, emergent, and submerged aquatic vegetation in the project area. 3 . Description of existing natural structure in the water (e .g. logs, rocks, overhanging bank, shallow slope bank) , including number, size, etc . 4 . Construction techniques a. Excavation area, even if reestablished after construction. b. Equipment to be used, such as backhoe or clamshell . c . Describe method to access work area (e .g. barge mounted or route by land) , including new access roads required. d. Describe sediment control methods . 5 . .Salmonid or bull trout spawning, rearing, or migratory areas or habitat present? (Can check with WDFW staff or data base) . a. Area of stream basin above project (square miles) . b. Type of stream (perennial or intermittent) . 6 . Photographs of the project site parallel to shoreline showing the water and land. 7 . Description of proposed project elements that are in the action area but not in waters of the U. S . , including removal of vegetation, creation of impervious surfaces; and proposed work timing. (Under ESA, the action area is "all areas to be affected directly or indirectly by the [work allowed by Federal permit] and not merely the immediate area involved in the action" ) . ' DETAILED DR R1G CHECK LIST FOR PERMIT APPLI IONS 1. General • ( ) Use clear black printing and fewest number of sheets possible. 2. Title Block ( ) Describe the facility or work (e.g. Pier, Float, Mooring Buoy, Bulkhead, Fill, EAcavation, Outfall, etc.) . ( ) Indicate whether application is for repair and preservation of existing work, proposed work or both. 3. Vicinity Map ( ) Show location of construction site(s) . Indicate latitude and longitude of site(s) to nearest second. ( ) Name waterway. ( ) Show roads, streets, and mileage to nearest town or city limits. 4. Plan View ( ) Show Shorelines. ( ) Tidal: Show mean high water line (MHW Line) or mean higher high water line (MHHW Line) for fills. ( ) Lakes: Show ordinary high water line (OHW Line) . ( ) Streams: Show ordinary high water line (OHW Line) . ( ) Show Federal harbor lines where established. ( ) Show dimensions of structure, distance of structure from property lines and encroachment beyond applicable high water line. ( ) Indicate quantity and type of fill and method of handling material, if any. ( ) Show all existing structures on subject and adjacent properties waterward of applicable high water line. ( ) Show direction of currents such as -tidal ebb and flood. ( ) Note existing or pending permits in navigable waters at the site. If none, note age of all existing structures. ( ) Indicate adjacent property ownership. ( ) Show and identify any wetland vegetation that is affected by the project. 5. Elevation and/or Section Views a ( ) Show the same water levels as on plan view. ( ) Show original and proposed ground lines, overall and typical dimensions of structure, and pertinent vertical dimensions to top and base of structure. ( ) Show and identify any special aquatic sites that are affected by the project (e.g. sanctuaries or refuges, wetlands, mud flats, vegetated shallows such as eelgrass beds, and riffle and pool complexes) . 6. Notes ( ) State purpose of the existing or proposed facility or work. ( ) List property owners and indicate by number on plan. ( ) Show datum used in plan and elevation views. ( ) Provide photographs of shoreline in both directions at project site. • 7. Remarks CITX OF RENTON ••LL si% Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator • a August 23, 1999 Kim Lane Puget Sound Energy 815 Mercer Street, MER-03N Seattle, WA 98109 Subject: Puget Sound Energy Sheetpile Removal Project No. LUA-99-028, SME, ECF Dear Mr. Lane: Thank you for the re-vegetation plans submitted July 26, 1999. However, there are remaining items on the plans that will need to be addressed before the City can issue the Shoreline Exemption Permit for the project. Specifically, the details provided on sheet L-2 do not correspond with what is shown on sheets L-1 and L-3. Details 3 and 4 of sheet L-2 show a 10-foot width between the revised shoreline and the proposed plantings and are also not consistent with the 10-foot vegetation buffer indicated on sheets L-1 and L-3. In addition, detail 2 of sheet L-2 does not correspond With the proposed plantings shown on sheet L-3. Depending on what the correct detail section is for the new rip rap area (2 of L2), the proposed plantings may encroach into the City's trail. According to the Parks Department, a minimum 3- foot wide buffer of hydroseeding would be necessary between the plantings and the trail in order to avoid invasive root systems that will break up the asphalt. The reduction of the 10-foot vegetation buffer in the eastern area of the site (approximately 70 feet in length)would be necessary to ensure an adequate distance from the plantings to the trail. The City will need two additional copies of the re-vegetation plan which reflect the corrections to the details on sheet L-2, as well as the revisions to the plantings near the rip rap area on sheets L- 1 and L-3 (to match detail 2 of L-2). Once received, the plan will again be routed to the Parks Department for their final approval. If approved, the Shoreline Exemption Permit will be issued. If you any questions regarding the corrections requested above, please contact me at(425)430- 7270. Sincerely, Ze 5 Lesley Nishih ra Project Manager • C: Leslie Betlach, Parks Department 1055 South� Grady Way-Renton, Washington 98055 [Y!7 Thic nannr rnntamc cf1o%rwrvrlwrt matwrial ,r oL,v,et rnncl emwr Leslie M. Nishihira From: Leslie Betlach To: Leslie M. Nishihira Subject: PSE Sheet Pile Removal Project - Review Comments Date: Saturday, August 07, 1999 4:19PM Priority: High Leslie, I have reviewed the above-referenced project and have several comments and need clarification. We may need a short follow-up mtg. after you read this. The elevation on sheet L-1 (elevation 2) corresponds to sections/details on sheet L-3 (details 2,3,and 4). Please note - the planting width is identified as 10' - 0". These details, however, do not relate to the details on sheet L-2 (details 2, 3, and 4) Section 2 on sheet L-2 does not correspond to what is shown on sheet L-1. Note this section does not show plant materials as identified on sheet L-1 and as noted by the cross hatching on sheet L-1 and shru': planting symbol on sheet L-3. Sections 3 and 4 on sheet L-2 do not correspond to what is drawn on sheet L-1 nor what is drawn on sheet L-3. Please note these sections show NO planting of willows, etc. for 10 feet from the Ordinary Hi Water Line but a planting strip of approximately 6' in width back from the 10' (for a total of 16'). I don't understand these two sections. Depending on what is the real section for the area with the new rip rap, the planting will encroach into tl- asphalt trail providing a trail significantly less than 10' in width. In addition, if willow shrubs are planted that close to the trail, willows are known to have invasive root systems and will break up the asphalt. Further clarification is needed before these plans can be approved. Please call me at x-6619 if you would like to discuss this. thanks, Leslie Page 1 • CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: July 26, 1999 TO: Leslie Betlach, Parks Division FROM: Lesley Nishihira, Development Services Division SUBJECT: PSE Sheet Pile Removal Project Project No. LUA-99-028, ECF, SME In March of this year, the City conducted Environmental (SEPA) Review for the removal of 825 feet of existing sheet pile along Puget Sound Energy's Lake Washington shoreline. The proposal was issued a Determination of Non-Significance subject to the following mitigation measures: 1) The design of the shoreline restoration plan shall allow for the future development of a trail system through the subject site. Specifically, the restoration of the shoreline bank will need to provide an adequate distance from the proposed sloping of the shoreline to accommodate a 10-foot wide trail connection between the adjacent properties and the subject site. 2) The applicant shall provide a detailed re-vegetation plan for the shoreline restoration proposed subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of the Shoreline Exemption Permit. The plan should specify the type, size, location, and quantity of proposed plantings on a fully dimensioned site plan and should be designed to allow for the future development of a trail system through the subject site. The attached plans provide clarification on the location of the revised shoreline as well as details for the proposed re-vegetation. In addition, the plans indicate a 24-foot distance at the northeast corner of the site from the revised shoreline to the nearest property line—which appears to be sufficient for a trail connection. At your earliest convenience, please review the attached plans and respond with comments, if any, by August 9, 1999. The Shoreline Exemption Permit will not be issued until the concerns of all reviewing sections have been satisfied. If you have any questions or need further information, please contact me at x7270. Thank you. PUG E T DEVELOPMENT PLANNING SOUND CITY OF RENTON ENERGY JUL 2 t 1999 July 16, 1999 RECEIVED Lesley Nishihira City of Renton Planning/Building/Public Works Dept 1055 South Grady Way Renton, Washington 98055 Subject: Puget Sound Energy Sheetpile Removal LUA99-028,ECF,SME Dear Lesley, In accordance with mitigation measures 1 and 2 of the Determination of Non- Significance associated with the subject application, please find enclosed three copies the following drawings for your review titled "Shuffleton Decommissioning; DNR Lease Hold Sheetpile Removal , Sheet 1 Grading Plan, Sheet 2 Details and Sheet 3 Landscape Plan. Please note that the proposed shoreline trail is located on our plans and that a detailed re-vegetation plan has been developed and is incorporated on these drawings. Also, the proposed new location of the shoreline has been shown. Please note that PSE has not received any comments from the Department of the Army regarding this application, and we are attempting to contact this agency to discuss the current status of our application. If you have any questions, or require additional drawings, please do not hesitate to give me a call at (206) 604 5292. Sincerely, Kim Lane Project Manager cc: Brandy Forbes, Nemens Assoc. CITY APF RENTON j �" Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E. Administrator r' April21, 1999 Ms. Kim Lane Puget Sound Energy 815 Mercer Street, MER-03N Seattle, WA 98109 SUBJECT: Puget Sound Energy Sheetpile Removal Project No. LUA-99-028,SME,ECF Dear Ms. Lane: This letter is to inform you that the comment and appeal periods have ended for the Environmental Review Committee's (ERC) Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the above-referenced project. No appeals were filed on the ERC determination. This decision is final and application for the Shoreline Exemption Permit may proceed. The applicant must comply with all ERC Mitigation Measures. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (425) 430-7270. For the Environmental Review Committee, 1-2-17 Lesley Nishihira Project Manager cc: Dept. of Natural Resources FINAL 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 67 This naner contains 50%recycled material 90%nnst consumer CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING... -11 On the ?`� ' day of 1lik-461 , 1999, I deposited in the mails of the Unit( i States, a sealed envelope containing de tiwiww.te-v\ documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing Department of Ecology Don Hurter WSDOT KC Wastewater Treatment Division Larry Fisher Washington Department of Fisheries David F. Dietzman Department of Natural Resources Shirley Lukhang Seattle Public Utilities Duwamish Indian Tribe Rod Malcom Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Joe Jainga Puget Sound Energy (Signature of Sender) �T_ ' • - STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) r I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that , signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for theses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: q 1 `i 1 e? y,� C Notary Public in andt'for the State of Washing Notary (Print) My appointmentORLYN KAMCHEFF COMMISSION EXPIRES 6/29/99 Project Name: P - Sound_ C\(\ 1.,k F;ewAbk_ Project Number: LUP. 94.1 • O Z6 NOTARY.DOC CITY ' RENTON MIMED 1 Planning/Building/Public Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator Jesse Tanner,Mayor March 25, 1999 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Subject: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on March 23, 1999: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED PUGET SOUND ENERGY SHEETPILE REMOVAL LUA-99-028,SME,ECF The applicant, Puget Sound Energy, is proposing to remove 825 feet of sheetpile located along the Lake Washington Shoreline. Necessary for the former Shuffleton Steam Plant operations, the sheetpile was or finally used to support an open flume which discharged heated water away from the cool water intake system. sheetpile canal now serves as a bulkhead for the existing shoreline. The proposal includes the restoratior Df the shoreline to a more natural condition in order to improve fish habitat near the mouth of the Cedar River. le proposal qualifies for an exemption from the Shoreline Master Program permit system, but requires SEP Environmental Review. Location: 1101 Lake Washington Boulevard North. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM April 12, 1999. :peals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 55 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code: Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Cle s Office, (425) 430-6510. If you have questions, please call me at (425) 430-7270. For the Environmental Review Committee, ZO-3//tt) T2(1--) Lesley Nishara Project Manager cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division Larry Fisher, Department of Fisheries David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources Don Hurter, Department of Transportation Shirley Lukhang, Seattle Public Utilities Duwamish Tribal Office Rod Malcom, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (Ordinance) Joe Jainga, Puget Sound Energy AGNCYLTR.DOC\ 1055 South Grady Way -Renton, Washington 98055 CIF]This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer d� CITY L_' RENTON LL Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator March 26, 1999 Mr. Kim Lane Puget Sound Energy 815 Mercer Street, MER-03N Seattle, WA 98109 SUBJECT: Puget Sound Energy Sheetpile Removal LUA99-028,ECF,SME Dear Mr. Lane: This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) and is to advise you that the have completed their review of the subject project. The ERC, on March 23, 1999, issued a threshold Determination i Non- Significance-Mitigated with Mitigation Measures. See the enclosed Mitigation Measures document. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM April 12, 1999. i deals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 11 ,5 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Cler, Office, (425) 430-6510. The preceding information will assist you in planning for implementation of your project and enable you to exerci your appeal rights more fully, if you choose to do so. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, ple e call me at (425) 430- . For the Environmental Review Committee, 4/1vti Lesley Nishihira Project Manager cc: Dept. of Natural Resources Enclosure Document4 1055 South� Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 EJ5 This paper contains 50°e recycled material,20%post consumer CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-99-028,SME,ECF APPLICANT: Puget Sound Energy PROJECT NAME: Puget Sound Energy Sheetpile Removal DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, Puget Sound Energy, is proposing to remove 825 feet of sheetpile located along the Lake Washington Shoreline. Necessary for the former Shuffleton Steam Plant operations, the sheetpile was originally used to support an open flume which discharged heated water away from the cool water intake system. The sheetpile canal now serves as a bulkhead for the existing shoreline. The proposal includes the restoration of the shoreline to a more natural condition in order to improve fish habitat near the mouth of the Cedar River. The proposal qualifies for an exemption from the Shoreline Master Program permit system, but requires SEPA Environmental Review. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 1101 Lake Washington Boulevard North MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. The design of the shoreline restoration plan shall allow for the future development of a trail system through the subject site. Specifically, the restoration of the shoreline bank will need to provide an adequate distance from the proposed sloping of the shoreline to accommodate a 10 foot wide trail connection between the adjacent properties and the subject site. 2. The applicant shall provide a detailed revegetation plan for the shoreline restoration proposed subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of the Shoreline Exemption Permit. The plan should specify the type, size, location, and quantity of proposed plantings on a fully dimensioned site plan and should be designed to allow for the future development of a trail system through the subject site. CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-99-028,SME,ECF APPLICANT: Puget Sound Energy PROJECT NAME: Puget Sound Energy Sheetpile Removal DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, Puget Sound Energy, is proposing to remove 825 feet of sheetpile located along the Lake Washington Shoreline. Necessary for the former Shuffleton Steam Plant operations, the sheetpile was originally used to support an open flume which discharged heated water away from the cool water intake system. The sheetpile canal now serves as a bulkhead for the existing shoreline. The proposal includes the restoration of the shoreline to a more natural condition in order to improve fish habitat near the mouth of the Cedar River. The proposal qualifies for an exemption from the Shoreline Master Program permit system, but requires SEPA Environmental Review. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 1101 Lake Washington Boulevard North Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Planning 1. A Shoreline Exemption Permit is required prior to the start of any construction/demolition work. 2. The project will require approval from the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, the Washington Department of Ecology, the Washington Department of Natural Resources, and the Corps Engineers prior to the commencement of any project related work. 3. Coordination with the City of Renton's Parks and Recreation Department is required for the design of the shoreline restoration and revegetation plans. • CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-99-028,SME,ECF APPLICANT: Puget Sound Energy PROJECT NAME: Puget Sound Energy Sheetpile Removal DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, Puget Sound Energy, is proposing to remove 825 t of sheetpile located along the Lake Washington Shoreline. Necessary for the former Shuffleton Steam Plant Opel ons, the sheetpile was originally used to support an open flume which discharged heated water away from the coo rater intake system. The sheetpile canal now serves as a bulkhead for the existing shoreline. The proposal incluc the restoration of the shoreline to a more natural condition in order to improve fish habitat near the mouth of the Cedar ver. The proposal qualifies for an exemption from the Shoreline Master Program permit system, but requires EPA Environmental Review. _OCATION OF PROPOSAL: 1101 Lake Washington Boulevard North _EAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section Ihe City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable sign cant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under ;CW 13.21C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee uncle their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental irr acts dentified during the environmental review process. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM April 12, 1999. AI als must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 10: South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: March 29, 1999 DATE OF DECISION: March 23, 1999 ;;IGNATURES: �i J2 Gregg r�ierm Aid finis �l�/7 DATE ) 7 99 Department of Planning/Building/Public Works •-•2 /S Jim epherd, Adminisfrator 4 DATE Community Services (4/ ) � Le a , Fire Chief DATE Fenton Fire Department D JSMSIG.DOC CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-99-028,SME,ECF APPLICANT: Puget Sound Energy PROJECT NAME: Puget Sound Energy Sheetpile Removal DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, Puget Sound Energy, is proposing to remove 825 feet of sheetpile located along the Lake Washington Shoreline. Necessary for the former Shuffleton Steam Plant operations, the sheetpile was originally used to support an open flume which discharged heated water away from the cool water intake system. The sheetpile canal now serves as a bulkhead for the existing shoreline. The proposal includes the restoration of the shoreline to a more natural condition in order to improve fish habitat near the mouth of the Cedar River. The proposal qualifies for an exemption from the Shoreline Master Program permit system, but requires SEPA Environmental Review. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 1101 Lake Washington Boulevard North MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. The design of the shoreline restoration plan shall allow for the future development of a trail system through the subject site. Specifically, the restoration of the shoreline bank will need to provide an adequate distance from the proposed sloping of the shoreline to accommodate a 10 foot wide trail connection between the adjacent properties and the subject site. 2. The applicant shall provide a detailed revegetation plan for the shoreline restoration proposed subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of the Shoreline Exemption Permit. The plan should specify the type, size, location, and quantity of proposed plantings on a fully dimensioned site plan and should be designed to allow for the future development of a trail system through the subject site. • CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-99-028,SME,ECF APPLICANT: Puget Sound Energy PROJECT NAME: Puget Sound Energy Sheetpile Removal DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, Puget Sound Energy, is proposing to remove 825 feet of sheetpile located along the Lake Washington Shoreline. Necessary for the former Shuffleton Steam Plant operations, the sheetpile was originally used to support an open flume which discharged heated water away from the cool water intake system. The sheetpile canal now serves as a bulkhead for the existing shoreline. The proposal includes the restoration of the shoreline to a more natural condition in order to improve fish habitat near the mouth of the Cedar River. The proposal qualifies for ar exemption from the Shoreline Master Program permit system, but requires SEPA Environmenta Review. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 1101 Lake Washington Boulevard North Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Planning 1. A Shoreline Exemption Permit is required prior to the start of any construction/demolition work. 2. The project will require approval from the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, the Washington Department of Ecology, the Washington Department of Natural Resources, and the Corps Engineers prior to the commencement of any project related work. 3. Coordination with the City of Renton's Parks and Recreation Department is required for the design of the shoreline restoration and revegetation plans. AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Charlotte Ann Kassens first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of the SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL 600 S. Washington Avenue, Kent, Washington 98032 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION a dailynewspaper seventimes a week. Said newspaper is a le al ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE published (7) g RENTON,WASHINGTON newspaper of general publication and is now and has been for more than six months The Environmental Review Committee prior to the date of publication, referred to, printed and published in the English language (ERG) has issued a Determination of Non- Significance - Mitigated for the following continually as a daily newspaper in Kent, King County, Washington. The South County project under the authority of the Renton Journal has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the Municipal Code. PUGET State of Washington for King County. REMOVAL ENERGY SHEETPILE The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the South County LUA-99-028,SME,ECF Journal (and not in supplemental form)which was regularly distributed to the subscribers Proposal to remove 825 ft. of sheetpile duringthe below statedperiod. The annexed notice, a located along the Lk. Wash.o tshoreline.Proposal includes restoration of the shore- line to improve fish habitat near the mouth Puget Sound Energy- Sheetpile Removal of the Cedar River. Location: 1101 Lk. Wash.Blvd. No. Appeals of the environmental determina- as published on: 3/29/99 tion must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM April 12, 1999.Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of$40.25, $75.00 application fee with: Hearing charged to Acct. No. 8051067. Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton,WA 98055.Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Legal Number 5885 Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton ega e , t Coun y Journal City Clerk's Office,(425)430-6510. Publication Date: March 29,1999 Published in the South County Journal Subscribed and sworn before me on this day of jahji,_19, March 29,1999.5885 „vovivvvvrr.i. ra,��° • ,- - `' • Notary Public of the State of Washington �..`'. residing in Renton r; c.� ^T ` • 71= King County, Washington d . NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. PUGET SOUND ENERGY SHEETPILE REMOVAL LUA-99-028,SME,ECF Proposal to remove 825 ft. of sheetpile located along the Lk. Wash. shoreline. Proposal includes restoration of the shoreline to improve fish habitat near the mouth of the Cedar River. Location. 1101 Lk. Wash. Blvd. No. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM April 12, 1999. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. Publication Date: March 29, 1999 Account No. 51067 dnsmnuh dot NOT4CE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: PUGET SOUND ENERGY SHEETPILE REMOVAL PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-99-02$,SME,ECF The applicant,Puget Sound Energy,Is proposing to remove 825 feet of sheelpile located along the Lake Washington Shoreline. Necessary for the loner Shutflelon Steam Plant operations,the sheelpile was originally used to support an open flume which discharged healed wafer away from the cool wafer intake system. The sheetpile canal now serves as a bulkhead for the existing shoreline. The proposal Includes the restoration of the psrhooreline to a more natural condition in order to improve fish habitat near the mouth of the Cedar River. The Environmal ental Review ualifies for an Local ore 11101 Lake Washington Boulevard from the Shoreline Mosier rNorth.permitam system,but requires SEPA THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the environmental determmination must be filed in writing on or before 5.00 PM April 12, 1Examiner,pCitys mustof Renton,e Ied in 1055 South Grady Way Rentoth the n required 98055..A0 ppeals tothe Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B.Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office,(425)430-6510. �. .nr.._x, ,1 '`\\\,, I'niCi I' • II p � �: 1rI 1 rhJI I )4�� fir R :1rn.,' r N /! "+ or, err[ s .4,, \, 1-; ---ae.��:'i'I,'1 l-..I.. �i 4e. ., .'La... II Iir.' • Ile ;II, .Ii. l r r -(1 lit: Lr I;• i r 1 C' P� 1 .. tl • l� ,^,ge•'.4)i..:"• \7:0'.‘l' ' .• ... : ''.. :. N i.\_,., i"0;. ...1..' .".4 I % ..,s 101 \lit..t \ 'i'.;..:Ir.r.1,., i • I t,-- I\1 . ' '1 . . } r h i 1f1 _11 I) :(Ia) a, l M.a_yr rea 1� 1- I !t+r.. I — ___. a'\1 - 1 • - . .1 .ii FOR FURTHER INFORMATION,PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON,DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT(425)430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please Include the project NUMBER when calling for proper le Identification. CERTIFICATION I, (-- ( 1'1 , hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document were posted by me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on a /a 5/ Fj • Signed: ce.t�/�� J ATTEST: Subcribed and sworn before me, a Nortary Pub ' , in and for the State of Washington residing in n vrv4 p,-) , on the q-h, day of arvut ►9 gq • —Th C frd,'YI al MARILYN KAMCHEFF COMMISSION EXPIRES 6/29/99 STAFF City of Renton REPORT Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE A. BACKGROUND ERC MEETING DATE March 23, 1999 Project Name Puget Sound Energy Sheetpile Removal Applicant Puget Sound Energy File Number LUA-99-028, ECF, SME Project Manager Lesley Nishihira Project Description The applicant, Puget Sound Energy, is proposing to remove 825 feet of sheetpile located along the Lake Washington Shoreline. Necessary for the former Shufflet 1 Steam Plant operations, the sheetpile was originally used to support an open flu!, which discharged heated water away from the cool water intake system. The sheetpile canal now serves as a bulkhead for the existing shoreline. The proposa includes the restoration of the shoreline to a more natural condition in order to improve fish habitat near the mouth of the Cedar River. The proposal qualifies fo an exemption from the Shoreline Master Program permit system, but requires SEPA Environmental Review. Project Location 1101 Lake Washington Boulevard North Exist. Bldg. Area gsf N/A Proposed New Bldg. Area gsf N/A Site Area 31.3 acres Total Building Area gsf N/A RECOMMENDATION Staff Recommend that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determinate of Non-Significance-Mitigated 1,y .� . f \ I` i, e;: R tta.4 ,+ II 'Jr, I. a "' _.._, " d i , k --•- p 2 R �G "I !I . 0 S' •AA e � i Ve 1 \ /. 'L., . a},gyp for A 1� . A : °do4 . . o, 4''s s .. \ =.\ tall ,° •I,r.�I d'ot•.lici\ \'''o\—,"; I- m....'' ,,._r \_..±---- . '..",. \. — \• SA , '':—.0 , ;','•• ‘, ...\__ f c I• 1 Project Location Map '� Il -_ _r 1oERCRP7 )OC II II __ j1.74 tk" ,1 1 1 _1-_"IR hti .I,ir , \\ i City of Renton P/B/PW Department Environmental Review Committee Staff RE ort PUGET SOUND ENERGY SHEET PILE REMOVAL LUA-99-028, ECF, : VIE REPORT AND DECISION OF MARCH 23, 1999 Page 2 3 B. RECOMMENDATION Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommend that the Responsible Officia make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINATION OF DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE NON-SIGNIFICANCE- MITIGATED. Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. X Issue DNS-M with 14 day Appeal Peric Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Pc )d followed by a 14 day Appeal Period. C. MITIGATION MEASURES 1. The design of the shoreline restoration plan shall allow for the future development of a trail system through th subject site. Specifically, the restoration of the shoreline bank will need to provide an adequate distance from th, proposed sloping of the shoreline to accommodate a 10 foot wide trail connection between the adjacent properti€ and the subject site. 2. The applicant shall provide a detailed revegetation plan for the shoreline restoration proposed subject to the r view and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of the Shoreline Exemption Permit. Th plan should specify the type, size, location, and quantity of proposed plantings on a fully dimensioned site plan E should be designed to allow for the future development of a trail system through the subject site. Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appear process for environmental determinations. Planning 1. A Shoreline Exemption Permit is required prior to the start of any construction/demolition work. 2. The project will require approval from the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, the Washington Department of Ecology, the Washington Department of Natural Resources, and the Corps Engineers prior to the commencement of any project related work. 3. Coordination with the City of Renton's Parks and Recreation Department is required for the design of the shot ne restoration and revegetation plans. D. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS In compliance with RCW 43.21 C. 240, the following project environmental review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards a, i environmental regulations. Has the applicant adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occr n conjunction with the proposed development? 1. Land and Shoreline Use Impacts: The proposal is to demolish the existing sheetpile and cross bracing that forms the decommissioned discharge canal used in Shuffleton Steam Plant operations. The canal consists of an 825 foot open, sheetpile FRCPPT nnr. City of Renton P/B/PW Department Environmental Review Committee Staff R, rt PUGET SOUND ENERGY SHEET PILE REMOVAL LUA-99-028, ECF, 'E REPORT AND DECISION OF MARCH 23, 1999 Page 3 3 supported flume which was used to direct heated water discharged from the plant away from the cool water inta system. The sheetpile canal runs north of the plant for 200 feet then extends to the northwest for 625 feet. Behind the p, tion of the canal that runs to the northwest is approximately 3 acres of upland area. This upland area was created al and 1966 by the placement of approximately 150,000 cubic yards of dredged sediment from Lake Washington. Whi some of the sediment was used as pre-load material for preparation of the Boeing property for building construe )n, much of the fill remained in this location. As a result, the existing sheetpile canal has served as a bulkhead for t e man-made shoreline for some time. The applicant is proposing the restoration of the shoreline to a more natural condition in conjunction with the ren ,val of the sheetpile bulkhead. The restoration of the shoreline will greatly contribute to the improvement of fish habi �t surrounding the mouth of the Cedar River. The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) expects t is habitat to be used by juvenile salmonid fish, including Puget Sound wild chinook salmon and other fish species. The project's exemption from the City's Shoreline Master Program is based on "the improvement of fish or wildli, habitat". In order for the proposal to qualify for this exemption, certain criteria must be met as established by the Program. These include the approval of the project by the WDFW as well as the appropriate design of the proje to accomplish the desired purpose. The applicant has provided a letter from the WDFW which states its support of he project as well as suggestions for the appropriate design of the restoration. In order to ensure the restoration of t e shoreline is adequately designed,includes sufficient revegetation, and provides allowance for a future trail systen staff recommends the mitigation measures listed below. Mitigation Measures: 1. The design of the shoreline restoration plan shall allow for the future development of a trail system through th subject site. Specifically, the restoration of the shoreline bank will need to provide an adequate distance from th proposed sloping of the shoreline to accommodate a 10 foot wide trail connection between the adjacent properti, and the subject site. 2. The applicant shall provide a detailed revegetation plan for the shoreline restoration proposed subject to the ! iew and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of the Shoreline Exemption Permit. Tt plan should specify the type, size, location, and quantity of proposed plantings on a fully dimensioned site plan a should be designed to allow for the future development of a trail system through the subject site. Nexus: Environmental Ordinance (SEPA), Shoreline Master Program E. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS The proposal has been circulated to City Departmental/Divisional Reviewers for their review. Where applicable, these comments have been incorporated into the text of this report as Mitigation Measures a, 'or Notes to Applicant. X Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. Environmental Determination Appeal Process Appeals of the environmental determination mus e filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM April 12, 1999. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. ERCRPT.DOC City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHE T • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: tCot/10lMtl✓ ('UQ( NY1e4OMMENTS DUE: 3/16/99 APPLICATION NO: LUA99-028,ECF,SME DATE CIRCULATED: 3/2/99 APPLICANT: Puget Sound Energy PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nishihira PROJECT TITLE: Puget Sound Energy Sheetpile Removal WORK ORDER NO: 78499 LOCATION: 1101 Lake Washington Blvd SITE AREA: 31.3 acres BUILDING AREA(gross): SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, Puget Sound Energy, is proposing to remove 825 feet of sheetpile used for the fo r Shuffleton Steam plant operations. Included with the proposal is the restoration of this area of the shoreline. 4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Inform n Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Neces: Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation _ Land/Shoreline Use Utilities _ Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet 13. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS VI e have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact o as w iere ditiorral-sfeFinatl 's needed to properly assess this proposal. 43/99 Signature of ector or horized Representative Date DE:VAPP.DOC( R, )/93 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHE T REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: w • COMMENTS DUE: 3/16/99 APPLICATION NO: LUA99-028,ECF,SME DATE CIRCULATED: 3/2/99 APPLICANT: Puget Sound Energy PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nishihira PROJECT TITLE: Puget Sound Energy Sheetpile Removal WORK ORDER NO: 78499 LOCATION: 1101 Lake Washington Blvd SITE AREA: 31.3 acres BUILDING AREA(gross): SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, Puget Sound Energy, is proposing to remove 825 feet of sheetpile used for the f( er Shuffleton Steam plant operations. Included with the proposal is the restoration of this area of the shoreline. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Inforn cion Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Neces ry Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet /Lp. Z e5 e--I -/ 57'" B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS `� c rb ) , C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS u °(- /� •!Ne have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact areas ,vhere additional information is need to property assess this proposal. 71-7 <510 7 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date :)EVAPP.DOC �i63 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHE : T REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: h. COMMENTS DUE: 3/16/99 APPLICATION NO: LUA99-028,ECF,SME DATE CIRCULATED: 3/2/99 APPLICANT: Puget Sound Energy PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nishihira PROJECT TITLE: Puget Sound Energy Sheetpile Removal WORK ORDER NO: 78499 LOCATION: 1101 Lake Washington Blvd SITE AREA: 31.3 acres BUILDING AREA(gross): SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, Puget Sound Energy, is proposing to remove 825 feet of sheetpile used for the f er Shuffleton Steam plant operations. Included with the proposal is the restoration of this area of the shoreline. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Inforn tion Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Nece5 ary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet ► 0 Po/ Q c t)et. , (C.P 4-) B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS • C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or A hdrized Representative Date DEVAPP DOC '2/93 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHI = T REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: S` ce w is feL 0,.k, COMMENTS DUE: 3/16/99 e APPLICATION NO: LUA99-028,ECF,SME DATE CIRCULATED: 3/2/99 oleOc APPLICANT: Puget Sound Energy PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nishihira 60-c)` PROJECT TITLE: Puget Sound Energy Sheetpile Removal WORK ORDER NO: 78499 4S6 LOCATION: 1101 Lake Washington Blvd r<�''b 7P99 SITE AREA: 31.3 acres BUILDING AREA(gross): ti/� SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, Puget Sound Energy, is proposing to remove 825 feet of sheetpile used for the f ter Shuffleton Steam plant operations. Included with the proposal is the restoration of this area of the shoreline. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable Morc Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Infor ion Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Nece ary • Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS r r 11)0 Oil' ill( ✓e �i4e0{.144 7-1 e) pet/t,t Ve({(�Iv.t( �vi 1 41, &dz-%. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS Ne have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact areas ,vhere additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 1,:.-.( ' i 3,f3/gw signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date EVAPP.DOC 10/93 • • City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SH = T REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: T uAL,t,,(,v-r -t1r COMMENTS DUE: 3/16/99 APPLICATION NO: LUA99-028,ECF,SME DATE CIRCULATED: 3/2/99 APPLICANT: Puget Sound Energy PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nishihira PROJECT TITLE: Puget Sound Energy Sheetpile Removal WORK ORDER NO: 78499 LOCATION: 1101 Lake Washington Blvd `11.RZA/ro SITE AREA: 31.3 acres BUILDING AREA(gross): SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, Puget Sound Energy, is proposing to remove 825 feetof sheetpile used for the t ier Shuffleton Steam plant operations. Included with the proposal is the restoration of this area of the shoreline. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Infor :ion Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Nece; ary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare _ Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation_ _ Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS nI ac(ki�ty:tit' ‘tuo1 y 7 v►PS assoCia7Pc{ u ? Z'k,e4 pv?Pos . 7lue.y 120 bill kal icv, 410 IS Ye9G(IVfti CODE-RELATED COMMENTS 1Jo slieeQZ I11,VV1 / Opr vegH0v-614vi tit, PvoovsS Ve have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact areas 'Mere additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. a c;JC� i 17 ;/3/, :;ignature of Director or Authorized Representative Date EVAPP.DOC 10/93 • • City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHt = T REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Eve COMMENTS DUE: 3/16/99 APPLICATION NO: LUA99-028,ECF,SME DATE CIRCULATED: 3/2/99 APPLICANT: Puget Sound Energy PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nishihira _Id PROJECT TITLE: Puget Sound Energy Sheetpile Removal _ WORK ORDER NO: 78499 =18� LOCATION: 1101 Lake Washington Blvd SITE AREA: 31.3 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): ' 199 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, Puget Sound Energy, is proposing to remove 825 feet of sheetpile used for the f ier Shuffleton Steam plant operations. Included with the proposal is the restoration of this area of the shoreline. :..1 V i j A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Inforr, non Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Nece y Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet / " B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS / C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS /i, Ne have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact areas vhere additio al information is 1 :•ded to properly assess this proposal. Signatur o Director or Authorized Ripresentative Date DEVAPP.D ✓ 10/93 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHE E ' REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: \-'!• peUe. , • COMMENTS DUE: 3/16/99 APPLICATION NO: LUA99-028,ECF,SME DATE CIRCULATED: 3/2/99 .VELOPMENT S VI OW of RtN " N APPLICANT: Puget Sound Energy PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nishihira PROJECT TITLE: Puget Sound Energy Sheetpile Removal WORK ORDER NO: 78499 MAR 0 3 1. 3 LOCATION: 1101 Lake Washington Blvd t' 'CE1 /` SITE AREA: 31.3 acres 1 BUILDING AREA(gross): L- l/ SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, Puget Sound Energy, is proposing to remove 825 feet of sheetpile used for the ne Shuffleton Steam plant operations. Included with the proposal is the restoration of this area of the shoreline. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major In foe 3tio Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Nece :ary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation _ Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation _ Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS JJ 6)44GLt{ a ` We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impa where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. )e !y, . ,/ -Y 3/e-7 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHi .. T REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Ct otv\tc 5-v\ -e r\j( co COMMENTS DUE: 3/16/99 APPLICATION NO: LUA99-028,ECF,SME DATE CIRCULATED: 3/2/99 0/71. APPLICANT: Puget Sound Energy PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nishihira - or` PROJECT TITLE: Puget Sound Energy Sheetpile Removal WORK ORDER NO: 78499 _ LOCATION: 1101 Lake Washington Blvd bVi �� SITE AREA: 31.3 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): kip, SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, Puget Sound Energy, is proposing to remove 825 feet of sheetpile used for the'farrfler Shuffleton Steam plant operations. Included with the proposal is the restoration of this area of the shoreline. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Infor ation Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necc ary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water LightGlare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities _ Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS V C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS /V;)A(L We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impa. or areas where ad 'tional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. , / 71, nature of Direc or Auted Representativ Date DEVAPP.DOC Re. 10/93 CITY OF RENTON ' DE ELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION L� T OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS ..within 300.feet of the` ubject site. :> PROJECT NAME: Puget Sound Energy ' s DNR Aquatic Lease Land Sheetpile I moval APPLICATION NO: LUR • q9 " O2$ , Srru SEC The following is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. The Development Services Division will notify these individuals of the proposed development. NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER Burlington Northern 1700 E Golf Rd . #400 Schaumburg, IL 60173 052305 9003 01 Burlington Northern 1700 E Golf Rd . #400 Schaumburg, IL 60173 082305 9027 00 The Boeing Company PO Box 3707 Seattle, WA 98124 072305 9001 01 The Boeing Company PO Box 3707 Seattle, WA 98124 082305 9011 08 The Boeing Company PO Box 3703 Seattle, WA 98124 082305 9079 07 The Boeing Company PO Box 3703 Seattle, WA 98124 082305 9204 05 The Boeing Company PO Box 1303 Seattle, WA 98124 082305 9187 06 Puget Sound Energy PO Box 90868 Bellevue, WA 98009 082305 9056 04 Puget Sound Energy PO Box 90868 Bellevue, WA 98009 082305 9057 03 Puget Sound Energy PO Box 90868 Bellevue, WA 98009 334450 0006 02 City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 334450 0775 01 Note : Since the DNR Lease Area does not have a tax assessor ' s number, PSE is using the Shuffleton Steam Plant site ( adjacent to the project site) to derive the list of property owners within 300 ' of the subject site. (Attach additional sheets, if necessary) (Continued) NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 1/' Applicant Certification NM w. , hereby certify that the above list(s) of ��if f sproperty owners and their(Print )addresses were obtained from: �� 4 �� • i°0 0 City of Renton Technical Services Recad Mot 44404`te�cr'� 0 Title Company Records =ry� ,�s- King County Assessors Records • • .s I Signed i Date Z 1 1 c "*iy��•• •'•r' (Applicant) psisM'‘‘‘��� NOTARY ATTESTED: Su ribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington, residing at G on the 15—day of f.62,,i,¢I , 1 g l? Signed (Notary Public) ..,.Fpr city of Renton Use**4 e • CERTIFICATION OF MAILING ( : I, hereby certify that notices of the proposed application were r;?aitr:r! tn (City Employee) each listed property owner on 3> .> (��,l Signed )101, 6r( ,( Date _ NOTARY ATTEST.(:Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing at . ���'1�_____ __on the �3n day of _ 1 , _.® .d -tom 19 Signed? r_ d� r listprop.doc REV °"95 MARILYN KAMCHEFF 2 COMMISSION EXPIRES G/29/99 • * -- _ -- .KetroScan / King Parcel # :052305 9003 01-- --- - - Owner :Burlington Northrn Santa F� Sale Date Site :*.No Site Address* Renton Mail : 1700 E Golf Rd #400 Schaumburg I1 60173 Sale VPrice :$922,000 Use :SO1 Vacant, Residential Lgl :STR 052305 TAXLOT 3 R/W SEC 5-23-5 Q:SW S:05 T:23N R:05`• Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: 11.50 YB: Ph: - - - - - • MetroScan / King : an Com Parcel # :072305 9001 01+ Owner :The Boeing Company Sale Date Site :800 Park Ave N Renton 98055 Sale Price . Mail :PO Box 3701 Seattle Wa 98124 Sle :$97, 539, 600 Use :625 Ind,Manufacturinq,Aircraft Asd.V 5: 07 T: 6 R:OS Lgl :STR 072305 TAXLOT 1 POP OF E 1/2 BldgSF: Q:NEAc: 1 .00S: Ph: Bedrm: Bth 13i-I: / / Stories: + -- MetroScan / King : Owner :Boeing Company Parcel # :082305 9011 08 Site :801 Garden Ave N Rentor. 98055 Sale Date :12/12/96 Mail : PO Box 3707 seattle Wa 98124 Sale Price :$254, 131 Usc :625 In d,Manufacturing,Aircraft Asd.V :$19, 714, 700 Lg1 :STR 082305 TAXLOT 11 POR NW 1/4 LY Q:NW S: 08 T:23N R:05 Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac:44 .00 YB: Ph: * - _ - --- . MetroScan / King Owner :Burlington Northrn Santa Fe Parcel # :082305 9027 00 Site :900 Lake Washington Blvd S Seattle 98144 Sale Date . Mail : 1700 E Golf Rd #400 Schaumburg 11 60173 Sale Price :S851,000 Use :953 Misc,Right-Of -Way,Ltility Asd.V NW S 08 T:23N R:05 Lgl :STR 082305 TAXLOT 27 B N R.Y CO R/W Q•• Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac:3.90 YB: Ph: *_____-. - - . MetxeScan / King :---- -- Owner : Puget Sound Energy/Elec Parcel # :082305 9056 04 Site :900 Houser Way N Renton 98055 Sale Date . Mail :PO Box 90868 Bellevue Wa 98009 Sale Price : Use : 953 Misc, Right-Of-Way,Utility Asd.V :$I58,800 Lgl :STR 082305 TAXLOT 56 N 200 FT OF Q:NW S:08 T:21N R:0` Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories : BldgSF: Ac: 1.82 YB: Ph: +-_-- - MetroScan / King : - Owner : Puget. Sound Energy/Flee Parcel # :082305 9057 03 Site :900 Lake Washington Blvd S Seattle 98144 Sale Date . Mail :PO Box 90868 Bellevue Wa 98009 Sale Price : Use :953 Misc,Right-Of-Way,Utility Asd.V :$1, 000 Lgl :STR 082305 TAXLOT 57 IN GL 2-BEG Q:NW S:08 T:23N K:Ot Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: YB: Ph: K r_._ MetroScan / Xing : .. - Owner :The Boeing Company Parcel if : 082305 9079 07 Site :800 Lake Washington Blvd S Seattle 98144 Sale Date . Mail :PO Box 3703 Seattle Wa 98124 Sale Price . Use :625 rud,Manufacturing,Aircraft Asd.V :$17,269, 000 Lgl :STR 082305 TAXLOT 79 POR GL 3 LY E Q:NW S:08 T:23N R:0`' Bedrm: Bth F3Ii: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: 31.00 YB: Ph:• - __, - .-_ MetroScan / King .-- Owner :Boeing Co Parcel # :082305 9187 06 Site :910 Lake Washington Blvd S Seattle 98144 Sale Date : 12/14/88 Mail :PO Box 1303 Seattle Wa 98111 Sale Price :$30, 000 Use :401 Pub,Parking,Associated Asd.V :$572,200 Lgl :STR 082305 TAXLOT 187 FOR OF GOV Q:NW S:08 T:23N R:0' Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: 81dgSF: Ac:2.62 YB: Ph: _- ` +____ ._ _ _ MetroScan / King : Owner :The Boeing Company Parcel # : 082305 9204 05 Site : 800 Lake Washington Blvd S seattle 98144 sale Date . Mail :PO Box 370'3 Seattle Wa 98124 Sale Price : Use :933 Vacant, Industria1,5 To 10 Acres Asd.V :$1, 546,500 Lg1 :STR 082305 TAXLOT 204 POR BN RR Q:NW S: 08 T:23N R:0 Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dg5F: Ac:7 . 10 YB: Ph: The Information Provided is Deemad Reli.yble, but Is Not i,u--rant*^_::. '•---- - ---: Metroscan / £% W Owner :Puget Sound Energy/Blec Parcel # : 334450 0006 02 Site : 1100 Lake Washington Blvd N Renton 98056 Sale Date Mail : PO Box 90868 Bellevue Wa 98009 Sal Price :$342, 900 Use :932 VacanL, Industrial, l To 5 Acres Asd.V S OS T:23N R:0 Lgl :LOT POR HILLMANS LK WN GARDEN OF Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: Ac: 1.96 YB: Ph:* -- k -------- : I treScan / King : - ' - Owner :City Of Renton Parcel fl : 334450 u775 01 Site : 1100 Lake Washington Blvd N Renton 98056 Sale Late . Mail :200 Mill Ave S Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price . Use : 349 Rec, Parks,Zoos,Arboretum Asd.V :$32, 394,000 Lgl :BLK 360 & LOT ALL HILLMANS LK WN Q:SW S:05 T: 2-N R:C Bedrm: Bth F3fi: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac:24 .00 YB: Ph: Th, I-t .rm1ticn Prvviic J Is INcc:m_d he114b1e, bur I.9 1.1.: GL,Jcdnr,r .i. i�Y Q Environmental Documents that G A Evaluate the Proposed Project: Final Sediment t......actenzation Report,Shalaeton Steam Plant Facility DNR ♦ ♦ Lease Alva,Renton,Washington.Prepared for Puget Sound Energy by - Wineman Environmental Consulting,in conjunction with Hart Crowser, I''N'C�e. November 7,1997. Development Regulations NOTICE OF APPLICATION Used For Project Mitigation: The proposal will be subject to the City's Environmental Ordinance,Zoning Code,Public Work's Standards,and the Shoreline Master Program. AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON- Proposed Mitigation Measures: SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (DNS-M) 1.The applicant shall provide a detailed revegetation plan for the shoreline restoration proposed.The plan should provide the type,size,location,and quantity of proposed plantings on a fully dimensioned site plan. Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Lesley Nishihira,Project Manager,Development DATE: March 2,1999 Services Division,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055.by 6:00 PM on March 16,1999. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail,contact Lesley LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-99-028,SME,ECF Nishihira at(425)430-7270.Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. APPLICATION NAME: Puget Sound Energy Sheetpile Removal CONTACT PERSON' LESLEY NISHIHIRA(425)430-7270 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant, Puget Sound Energy, is proposing to remove 825 feet of I PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION sheelpile located along the Lake Washington Shoreline. The sheetpile was originally used to support an open flume for the intake of cooling water for the former Shuffleton Steam plant operations.The sheetpile now serves as a bulkhead for the existing shoreline. The proposal includes the restoration of the shoreline to a more natural condition in order to improve fish habitat near the mouth of the Cedar River. The proposal is exempt from the Shoreline Master Program permit system,but requires SEPA Environmental Review. NEIGHBORHOOD PROJECT LOCATION: 1101 Lake Washington Blvd. DETAIL MAP ` y I - i(-" Dom hp*tear u..N.ew...e.. . -OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED:As the Lead Agency.the Cityof Renton has \ • I I I-'? determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project.Therefore,as ;_• 'i,4•ry - •,+`a n % e 1' C �,�' .J l'- pemnmed under the RCW 43.21C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS-M \. S hi •% DNS-M In likelyto be Issued.Comment process to notice that l Nos-'• -� I periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are Integrated into a single • + !\,� i+. �` - comment period.There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non- Le k' e ' `.a\ 1 • `: .i In 1, Significance Mitigated(DNS- .A 14 day a period , q 9 (D Nt) Y appeal nod will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. ,r:_ 4, ;•, .s l.,, - PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: February 25.1999 - '-'-' , r l.'7•F, NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: Martin 2.1999 i '`t i% 1'- I1 74 tYr I . C- !• „ci 17 APPLICANT: Puget Sound Energy V.•' 1' '4„ .. m A IA• Department of Natural Resources e4{4e \i'- + +r "'Bn'^J Otv t,-?. 1 OWNER: rrsv' - • •S t• l^ .a v'�.,,,',I Permas/Review Requested: SEPA,Shoreline Exemption1.r[ y F '•'y Othr Permits which may be required: Hydraulic Project Approval,Army Corps of Engineers 'r _ - � { - 1 I ; Requested Studies: Environmental Checklist .'f1/ t t - Location where application may -. De reviewed. Planning/Building/Public uildin t ,,,,,..•a' ~ - ref•' gip,' '...g/8 g/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, [• rir • 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 t --._ • .I• �' •' ,��,'+ �'�• I • PUBLIC HEARING: None required, w i•••"`""'e' d IL•r ',If". grey �.1 •��''1 CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: ,' \ I I A�S'_ I{ \ .` 11. Analytical process . v,,,« r-. 1 e `r- 1 Protect consistency refers to whether a project Is consistent with adopted and applicable development regulations,or in .i.•l,•'ti� •� G�:j,S + ,, •I I- their absence,comprehensive plan policies.RCW OB.70B.I I0(2)(g)provides that the Notice of Application(NOA) - I i. i •-LI-et,L'.t kY' \. ,4 I I � 'I ' i .I, : 1 • include a statement o1 the preliminary determination of a project's consistency with the type of land use,level of .j' e, development,Infrastructure,and character of development 'I', I \ \n; l'1' I I { . �'� "•^i r if one has been made at the time of notice. a minimum, 4R1- every NOA shall include a determination of the project's consistency with the zoning,comprehensive plan and ', ..\ ii I •`�L-../" - I i ;,_j/.i L•- Oevelopment regulations. 1 ,t\I . q I i �•. r[f^•' Land Use: The proposal is consistent with the Urban Shoreline designation of the Shoreline I • .,. • - --- -4 I I Master Program,as welt as with the HeavyIndustrial zoning designation .--z -- 1 ram'.- -- _L1J_ ' (FQ rai and .rq,n. I I I I' ' E' 1 the Employment Area•Industrial Comprehensive land Use Map designation. -,} • )1p+(e. ••I `I• of il: II y Iyp ......... _. GENIMLOT.DOC -11 I I S=' , L._ . X . GENMALOT 00C CERTIFICATION • I, 3S�ep, --k\ ,4 , hereby certify that -a copies of the above document were posted by me in . conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on q l 4- f IG con • Signed: _lL- _,_, ATTEST: Subcribed and worn before me, a NortaryPublic, in or the State of Washington residing in 41.5 a-y-)4,9-y) , on the�_day of /.1..t', J '9 MARILYN KAMCHEFF COiv M SSION EXPIRES 6/29/99 ( 1) NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON- SIGNIFICANCE - MITIGATED (DNS-M) DATE: March 2,1999 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-99-028,SME,ECF APPLICATION NAME: Puget Sound Energy Sheetpile Removal PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant, Puget Sound Energy, is proposing to remove 825 feet of sheetpile located along the Lake Washington Shoreline. The sheetpile was originally used to support an open flume for the intake of cooling water for the former Shuffleton Steam plant operations. The sheetpile now serves as a bulkhead for the existing shoreline. The proposal includes the restoration of the shoreline to a more natural condition in order to improve fish habitat near the mouth of the Cedar River. The proposal is exempt from the Shoreline Master Program permit system,but requires SEPA Environmental Review. PROJECT LOCATION: 1101 Lake Washington Blvd. OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED: As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore,as permitted under the RCW 43.21 C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS-M process to give notice that a DNS-M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated(DNS-M). A 14 day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: February 25, 1999 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: March 2,1999 APPLICANT: Puget Sound Energy OWNER: Department of Natural Resources Permits/Review Requested: SEPA,Shoreline Exemption Other Permits which may be required: Hydraulic Project Approval,Army Corps of Engineers Requested Studies: Environmental Checklist Location where application may be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 PUBLIC HEARING: None required. CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Analytical process Project consistency refers to whether a project is consistent with adopted and applicable development regulations,or in their absence,comprehensive plan policies. RCW 36.70B.110(2)(g)provides that the Notice of Application(NOA) include a statement of the preliminary determination of a project's consistency with the type of land use,level of development,infrastructure,and character of development if one has been made at the time of notice. At a minimum, every NOA shall include a determination of the project's consistency with the zoning,comprehensive plan and development regulations. Land Use: The proposal is consistent with the Urban Shoreline designation of the Shoreline Master Program,as well as with the Heavy Industrial(IH)zoning designation and the Employment Area-Industrial Comprehensive Land Use Map designation. GENMALOT.DOC I Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Final Sediment Characterization Report, Shuffleton Steam Plant Facility DNR Lease Area,Renton, Washington. Prepared for Puget Sound Energy by Wineman Environmental Consulting,in conjunction with Hart Crowser, November 7,1997. Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: The proposal will be subject to the City's Environmental Ordinance,Zoning Code,Public Work's Standards,and the Shoreline Master Program. Proposed Mitigation Measures: 1. The applicant shall provide a detailed revegetation plan for the shoreline restoration proposed. The plan should provide the type,size,location,and quantity of proposed plantings on a fully dimensioned site plan. Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Lesley Nishihira, Project Manager, Development Services Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton,WA 98055, by 5:00 PM on March 16, 1999. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact Lesley Nishihira at(425)430-7270. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: LESLEY NISHIHIRA (425)430-7270 PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION I a: \� • NEIGHBORHOOD DETAIL MAP " ° r -� IIII Ik I •x,t DNR Aquatic Lease Land Sheetpile Removal 1" O ,i 51 I r:I a-ii r• . I '-IQI��II � 1 LF��.,. y•'ni ~'• m 1k -i 'O1I. \ o' . Or''j1 „ '1 ', P 1,'J'[I III I' - •' Fo,"''J' ;IN,•. Z 3 11 . . L i if 41 �� 'S%•L`- +••:�y • �ve<T y ,\ • `\"'((I `'kit, . 4 'I II 'l fl I i • A r ' 3. i-_m. >� a ."u III. c, \.% � a \ ',hi ."1,;-': 6 . i pO'", .< c . ..... ~O TAr 4 " o . .a �rlir, L, o., pl '' A , }_I' a ri . 17Q�ss 'bit I .:'1 it; I, 1 NING10N //���/' \'\ \ oZ A��`t I I¢k o a `s, 01-1)1 h Hi. 't O • 1 ps /// .GERf COULO MOIOPIA 'el'.[..' 1. e', - �'' II:1 'I • I ..i i•axj �. 6[a[x e.t.N l G - • i. , ,� •IM( .a�, a i �a 1 I R r� r/ L r ar rI l„on \. II� ... / n � .± illi _- w, 'L , . I 'p.. t5�!/11.4. I SMOPEI^NDS ',, [e •6-�; .,;�\Q-64.;///// ;J`• '^• ty-' t Ri1,1 � " P. t .SHINGTON w 1 „ ' 4ttJ,, 71 ,. 1 I,, -I •-...1. 7iM. f .- 1'..:, i /''t.dry . �''t J,, .!.\\ •t',\ e,. i., I. T � .4 axon[t.xea O O \ ✓! "t:'eaL%t a / •S,rJ4� r �5• ?\\• I ` „, \ `\ l 1- -- ,s ` .i t `P`Asa••+. / J i 7..all. \ \\ t • ,.i o `E E `—J 1. _ 71,E ',_ I• II 1i \ \ :/ ' 1):;/:-.',/ •") , ' e as• .I. ., 1t \,g t ,' x .i.. 't.„,' i , ', \. ; \\ I \ i \ _ I; \{\ •Il ,..�/fw/`}'(:•fir I ." - 11 ( I II I 1 \" '(\ \ 1 1.' ` I '-- '- - e --- n "_street - '.. w •'pie \`{``" \y Y iF t x.... .111� ., •, 1', r: 06: I .......,.....,.....,...n.. ITY Or, RE TO\, ' \�, \ ''II I .I Po�T'P,L -- w....,.,u.....,.,•,..,,.. AIR OR { '1 ... __. i__ 1\ '. ..�.,...... rI I9.. 4,)7(i : I 1 , 0 \\;" i __ ..4' ,/. , !Mali EA I ITT rill!` CITY RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department J e Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator March 2, 1999 Mr. Kim Lane Puget Sound Energy 815 Mercer Street, MER-03N Seattle, WA 98109 SUBJECT: Puget Sound Energy Sheetpile Removal LUA99-028,ECF,SME Dear Mr. Lane: The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. • It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on March 23, 1999. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. Please contact me, at (425) 430-7270, if you have any questions. Sincerely, 't(h71/1") P7S---L; Lesley Nishihira Project Manager cc: Dept. of Natural Resources ACCPTLTR.DOC 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 C�7 This naner contains SO%recycled material.90%nnst consumer _ gib .' _ • • CITY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION L1►ND USE :PER MASTER APPLICATION PROPERTY OWNERS) +R0JECT INFORMATION Note 1t:short.jsmoto thMt el»I ewna'.DNu 4itKh ' hAMAMI.M.atar: *Boadort... ... �wt." :'i. . PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: Puget Sound Energy/DNR Aquatic Le ?e NAME: Department of Natural Resources Sheetpile Removal Project Attn: David Bortz PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRESSISI/LOCATION: ADDRESS: 1101 Lake Washington Blvd . PO Box 68 Renton, WA 98056 CITY: Enumclaw ZIP: 9 8 0 2 2-0 0 6 8 KING COUNTY ASSESSORS ACCOUNT NUMSER(S►: N/A TELEPHONE NUMBER: EXISTING LAND USEIS): ( 360) 902-1111 ext . 1904550 The site is currently open space ;.t the shoreline bulkheaded with she �g APPLICANT(It otter then owner) ; PROPOSED LAND USES: NAME: Puget Sound Energy Removal of the sheetpile and rest -a Attn: Mr. Kim Lane of natural shoreline to enhance f sh habitat COMPANY IN app cabin): EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: N/A Employment Area - Industrial ADDRESS: 815 Mercer Street, MER-03N PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (If aF cab N/A CITY: Seattle ZIP: 98109 EXISTING ZONING: - r'pF�T IN - Heavy Industrial,. RFNT�.A, TELEPHONE NUMBER: a 7999 (425) 4 6 2-317 3 PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable-: 1 ' N/A ' CONTACT"PERSON • SITE AREA ISO.FT. OR ACREAGE): NAME: Mr. Kim Lane The entire site is 31 . 3 acres , me tl underwater of Lake Washington . 'I e shore area is only 3 acres of the si COMPANY lit applicable): PROJECT VALUE: Puget Sound Energy $150, 000 ADDRESS: 815 Mercer Street , MER-03N IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? No. The site is located underwat r Lake Washington Seattle zw• 98109 IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENVIRONMEIS ALL SENSITIVE AREA? The site is located mostly under" te TELEPHONE NUMBER: ,Lake Washington. (425) 462-3173 l ,..LEGAL DESCRIPTION �.P- ROPERTY; Attaeh'sepereta�-$ t if necessary) See attached . f — TYPE OF APPLICATION &:FEES -.'. Check eu application typel.that apply-City staff will determine fees. ANNEXATION $ SUBDIVISION: ---- COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT $ _ RE�:ONE S _ LOT LMN! ADJUSTMENT e — SPECIAL PERMIT $ _SHORT PLAT $ TEMPORARY PERMIT $ TENTATIVE PLAT $ — CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ PRELIMINARY PLAT $ SI7 E PLAN APPROVAL $ ^ FINAL PLAT $ GRADE & FILL PERMIT $ (NO. CU. YDS: ) PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ _VARIANCE $ (FROM SECTION: ) _ PRELIMINARY _W1 AVER $ FINAL _WETLAND PERMIT $ ROUTINE VEGETATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ BitDING SITE PLAN $ SHOO ELINE REVIEWS: SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ _CC NDITIONAL USE 9 VARIANCE $ X EXEMPTION $No Charge X ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW S 1 , 000 ,RE J(SION $��` AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP DfFvlOc- •Joey,- ,/ I, (Print Name) . dieters that I am fotoase check one)_:►�e(.0.n90 e.f the r.enw"ty involved in that :p02=t^lin_^, author red representative to act for the property owner(please attach proof of authorization),and that the foregoing statements and answers h I 'sin contained and the information herewith submitted are in ell respects true and corratt.Lto the best of my knowledge and belief. (I P ft ID 30 -7---Z- ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me,a Notary Public, in for the Stsre of i .h2::a,�'h\ residing eta (Name of Owner/Representative) - ' h ,on the `t day of d40) r<i,� 18 . 46 __ /9--7421 -- (Slgnature of Owner/Representatu'e) \\)tik k biYvk, (Signature ofary Public) (This section to be completed by City Staff.) City File Number: u,'I?9"(.9_ ; ' A AAD --BSP : CAP-S CAP-U CPA CU•A CU-H ® LLA MHP FPUD FP PP R -RVMP.>'SA-A SA-H :SHPL-A SHPL-H SP SM M-t3 TP V-A V-8 V-H N TOTAL FEES: $ 00 f YE, TOTAL POSTAGE PROVIDED: $ IF.1 .kiX ;SS) MASTEIIAP.DOC REVISED OM - — 411 • • Legal Description That portion of the Harbor Area according to the Commissioners of Public Lands as shown on the Thin Supplemental Map of Lake Washington Shore Lands as recorded on September 14, 1965 lying in front of Section 8, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W M., in King County, Washington, and being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the North one-quarter corner of said Section 8, thence North 89° 58' 32" West, along the North line of the Northwest quarter of said Section 8 and the westerly extension thereof, a distance of 1721 40 feet to a concrete monument, thence North 44° 14' 23" West, a distance of 680 06 feet to a point on the Inner Harbor Line of said Lake Washington Shore Lands Map, from which Inner Harbor Angle Point No. 88, bears North 45° 45' 00" East, a distance of 1038.98 feet, said point being a concre monument, thence South 45°45' 00" West, along said Inner Harbor Line, a distance of 661.86 feet anc the True Point of Beginning, thence continuing South 45° 45' 00" West, a distance of 708.53 feet, thence North 44° 15' 00" West, a distance of 326.17 feet; thence North 70° 28' 08" East, a distance of 780 00 feet, more or less, to the True Point of Beginning. • • Puget Sound Energy DNR Aquatic Lease Sheetpile Removal Project Project Narrative January 19, 1999 PROJECT NARRATIVE Project Name, Size and Location of Site This project narrative has been prepared for the DNR Aquatic Lease Sheetpile Removal Project. This Puget Sound Energy project is located on the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) harbor lease area on the south end of Lake Washington. The site is approximately 31.3 acres of Lake Washington, into which extends approximately 625 lineal feet of sheetpile canal. This leasehold property was used by the adjacent Shuffleton Steam Plant as a harbor for barges. Site address: 1101 Lake Washington Blvd. N. Site location: On Lake Washington between the Boeing Renton Plant and PSE's Shuffleton Steam Plant facility property. Q-S-T-R: NW Section 8, Township 23 North, Range 5 East SW Section 5, Townshi Range 5 East CITY OF RE ON Zoning Designation of the Site and Adjacent Properties FEB 2 5 ;99 Current zoning on the site and adjacent properties is IH - Heavy Industrial RECEP =D Current Comprehensive Plan designated land use on the site and adjacent properties is Employment Area-Industrial Current Use of Site and Existing Improvements This leasehold property was used by the adjacent Shuffleton Steam Plant as a harbor for barges. When it operated,the Shuffleton Steam Plant facility utilized cooling water drawn from Lake Washington by means of an intake tunnel. After passing through the condensers, the water was returned to Lake Washington via a discharge tunnel. After the plant operated for several years, it became apparent that re-circulation of heated water back to the intake was occurring, subsequently reducing plant efficiency. The solution was to place 825 feet of open, sheet-pile supported flume in the harbor area to act as an extension of the existing cooling water canal, directing heated water away from the intake. The Shuffleton plant was decommissioned shortly after 1989, its last year of part-time operation. The subject improvement is located at the northwest corner of the Shuffleton Steam Plant site (see neighborhood map). The sheetpile-supported out-fall discharge channel runs north for 200 feet within PSE fee owned property, then at the northwest corner of PSE property, it turns to the northwest and extends 625 feet into the leased area, adjacent to Boeing's northern property. Behind this portion of the canal is approximately 3 acres of upland area. This upland area was created in 1966/1967,by placing approximately 150,000 cubic yards of dredged sediment from Lake Washington in the area after use as pre-load material in preparation for building construction on Boeing's property. As a result, the existing lake shoreline is bulkheaded with the inboard sheetpile of the discharge channel. There are no wetlands adjacent to or on the parcel referred to in this project. A dock runs parallel to the canal within the Shuffleton Steam Plant property, but ends at the property line. Statement Addressing Soil Type and Drainage Conditions The project site is located on lake water. Soil is aquatic, consisting of a combination of placed riprap and lake sediment deposited over sandy alluvium. I Puget Sound Energ\ DNR Aquatic Lease Sheetpile Removal Projeci Project Narrative January 19, 1999 Proposed Use of the Property and Scope of the Proposed Development (i.e., height, square footage, lot coverage, parking, access, etc.) Scope of Proposed Development PSE originally proposed to only remove the outer course of sheetpile located within the DNR Aquatic lease area. This was to reduce the amount of disturbed sediment and fill. However, after consultation with the Washington State Department of Fisheries, it was decided that the long-term benefits of providing a more natural shoreline and its associated rearing habitat would out weight any short-term detriment to water quality. PSE now proposes to remove both sides of the canal and grade the fill placed against the inboard sheetpile to produce a shoreline that could trap wood and other debris. PSE will also remove three dolphins located within the leasehold water. The proposed methodology for sheetpile and dolphin removal is by use of vibratory equipment located on a shallow draft barge. Sloping the new shoreline after sheetpile removal would be accomplished wit), equipment operated on the shore. No import or removal of material is proposed. Proposed Use of the Property The removal will be conducted to expedite PSE's lease termination with the DNR. Additionally, this sheetpile removal would prepare the land for alternative functions as may be developed by the DNR. Special Site Features There is 825 feet of open, sheet-pile supported flume in the harbor area acts as an extension of the existing cooling water canal from the Shuffleton Steam Plant on the adjacent PSE fee owned land, directing heated water away from the intake. The Shuffleton plant was decommissioned shortly after 1989, and this flume no longer serves in this capacity. The sheetpile supported out-fall discharge channel runs north for 200 feet within PSE fee owned property, then at the northwest corner of PSE property, it turns to the northwest and extends 625 feet into the leased area, adjacent to Boeing's northern property. The existing lake shoreline is bulkheaded with the inboard sheetpile of the discharge channel. Proposed Off-Site Improvements (i.e., installation of sidewalks,fire hydrants, sewer main, etc.) None. Total Estimated Construction Cost and Estimated Fair Market Value of Proposed Project $150,000 construction costs Estimated Quantities And Type Of Materials Involved If Any Fill Or Excavation Is Proposed None. Sloping the new shoreline after sheetpile removal would be accomplished with equipment operated on the shore. No import or removal of material is proposed. Number, Type, And Size Of Trees To Be Removed None. Explanation Of Any Land To Be Dedicated To The City None. Page 2 of • • Puget Sound Energy DNR Aquatic Lease Sheetpile Removal Project SEPA Environmental Checklist January 19, 1999 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND: 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Puget Sound Energy/DNR Aquatic Lease Sheetpile Removal Project 2. Name of Applicant: Puget Sound Energy Mr. Kim Lane Program Manager 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Mr. Kim Lane Project Manager Puget Sound Energy 815 Mercer Street MER-03N Seattle, Washington 98109 (206)521-5029 (206)521-5155 Fax 4. Date checklist prepared: V +ELOP'1'ENT PLq� CITY OF RENTON January 19, 1999 FEB 2 5 1999 5. Agency requesting checklist: RECEIVED City of Renton 6. Proposed timing or schedule (include phasing if applicable): Proposed project is scheduled for completion in 1999. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansions, or further activities related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain: No. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal: Final Sediment Characterization Report, Shuffleton Steam Plant Facility DNR Lease Area, Renton, Washington. Prepared for Puget Sound Energy by Wineman Environmental Consulting, in conjunction with Hart Crowser,November 7, 1997. • • Puget Sound Energy DNR Aquatic Lease Sheetpile Removal Project SEPA Environmental Checklist December 14, 1998 Sheetpile Wall Analysis. Prepared for Puget Sound Energy by Golder Associates,December 13, 1996 Technical Memorandum#2 Additional Characterization Sampling-DNR Property Lease Area Uplands. Prepared for Puget Sound Energy by Wineman Environmental Consulting,August 3, 1998. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: None 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known: City of Renton Environmental Review&Threshold Determination Department of Fish and Wildlife Shoreline Exemption Permit Department of Fish and Wildlife Hydraulic Project Approval Department of Ecology Section 401 Water Quality Certification Department of Ecology Temporary Exceedance of Water Quality Standards Department of Natural Resources Aquatic Resources Use Authorization Notification Corps of Engineers Section 10 Permit 11. Give a brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. Background The DNR harbor lease area is approximately 31.3 acres of Lake Washington, into which extends approximately 625 lineal feet of sheetpile canal. This leasehold property was used by the adjacent Shuffleton Steam Plant as a harbor for barges. When it operated, the Shuffieton Steam Plant facility utilized cooling water drawn from Lake Washington by means of an intake tunnel. After passing through the condensers, the water was returned to Lake Washington via a discharge tunnel. After the plant operated for several years, it became apparent that re-circulation of heated water back to the intake was occurring, subsequently reducing plant efficiency. The solution was to place 825 feet of open, sheet-pile supported flume in the harbor area to act as an extension of the existing cooling water canal,directing heated water away from the intake. The Shuffieton plant was decommissioned shortly after 1989, its last year of part-time operation. The subject improvement is located at the northwest corner of the Shuffieton Steam Plant site (see neighborhood map). The sheetpile-supported out-fall discharge channel runs north for 200 feet within PSE fee owned property, then at the northwest corner of PSE property, it turns to the northwest and extends 625 feet into the leased area,adjacent to Boeing's northern property. Behind this portion of the canal is approximately 3 acres of upland area. This upland area was created in 1966/1967, by placing approximately 150,000 cubic yards of dredged sediment from Lake Washington in the area after use as pre-load material in preparation for building construction on Boeing's property. As a result, the existing lake shoreline is bulkheaded with the inboard sheetpile of the discharge channel. There are no wetlands adjacent to or on the parcel referred to in this project. A dock runs parallel to the canal within the Shuffleton Steam Plant property,but ends at the property line. Page 2 of15 • • Puget Sound Energy DNR Aquatic Lease Sheetpile Removal Project SEPA Environmental Checklist December 14, 1998 Project Components PSE originally proposed to only remove the outer course of sheetpile located within the DNR Aquatic lease area. This was to reduce the amount of disturbed sediment and fill. However, after consultation with the Washington State Department of Fisheries, it was decided that the long-term benefits of providing a more natural shoreline and its associated rearing habitat would out weight any short-term detriment to water quality. PSE now proposes to remove both sides of the canal and grade the fill placed against the inboard sheetpile to produce a shoreline that could trap wood and other debris. PSE will also remove three dolphins located within the leasehold water. The proposed methodology for sheetpile and dolphin removal is by use of vibratory equipment located on a shallow draft barge. Sloping the new shoreline after sheetpile removal would be accomplished with equipment operated on the shore. No import or removal of material is proposed. Proposed Use of the Property The removal will be conducted to expedite PSE's lease termination with the DNR. Additionally, this sheetpile removal would prepare the land for alternative functions as may be developed by the DNR. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Site address: 1101 Lake Washington Blvd. N. Renton, Washington 98056 Site location: On Lake Washington between the Boeing Renton Plant and PSE's Shuffleton Steam Plant facility property. Q-S-T-R: NW Section 8, Township 23 North, Range 5 East SW Section 5, Township 23 North, Range 5 East B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: 1. Earth a. General description of site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? N/A. The project site is located on lake water. Page 3 ofl5 • • Puget Sound Energy DNR Aquatic Lease Sheetpile Removal Project SEPA Environmental Checklist December 14, 1998 c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Soil is aquatic,consisting of a combination of placed riprap and lake sediment deposited over sandy alluvium. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. There are no surface indications and no known history. e. Describe the purpose, type and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. The proposed methodology for sheetpile and dolphin removal is by use of vibratory equipment located on a shallow draft barge. Sloping the new shoreline after sheetpile removal would be accomplished with equipment operated on the shore. No import or removal of material is proposed. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction or use? If so, generally describe. Erosion will not occur since the proposed project is located underwater. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? No impervious surfaces are proposed to be added. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion or other impacts to the earth, if any: None are proposed. 2. Air a. What type of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial, wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Construction equipment will be expected to produce minor emissions. Once the work is complete, there will be no continued emissions to the air due to the proposed project. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. There are no off site sources of emissions or odor that will affect the proposal. Page 4 ofl5 • • Puget Sound Energy DNR Aquatic Lease Sheetpile Removal Project SEPA Environmental Checklist December 14, 1998 c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: None are proposed. 3. Water a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Yes. Lake Washington and the Cedar River. The river drains into Lake Washington. 2) Will the project require any work over, in or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Yes. Sheetpile removal and shoreline regrade will occur over or adjacent to the waters of Lake Washington. Please see attached plans. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. The existing material supported by the inboard sheetpile will be sloped into the lake to form a shoreline with an approximate 2:1 slope to the existing canal floor. No additional material will be imported or removed. Approximately 2.5 cubic yards of material will be moved per foot of shoreline. With 500 feet of shoreline being regraded, a total of 1600 cubic yards of material will be moved. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. Sheetpile removal will take place within the waters of Lake Washington. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. Page 5 of15 • • Puget Sound Energy DNR Aquatic Lease Sheetpile Removal Project SEPA Environmental Checklist December 14, 1998 b. Ground Water: 1) Will groundwater be withdrawn or will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No water will be discharged to groundwater,and no groundwater withdrawal is planned. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground for septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None. c. Water Runoff(including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. N/A. Sheetpile removal will take place within the waters of Lake Washington. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. N/A. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground or runoff water impacts, if any: N/A. 4. Plants a. Check the types of vegetation found on the site: Deciduous tree: alder,maple, aspen,other Evergreen tree: fir,cedar,pine,other Shrubs X Grass Pasture Crop or grain Wet soil plants: cattail,buttercup,bulrush, skunk cabbage,other X Water plants: water lily,eelgrass, milfoil,other Other types of vegetation Page 6 ofl 5 • • Puget Sound Energy DNR Aquatic Lease Sheetpile Removal Project SEPA Environmental Checklist December 14, 1998 b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Approximately 7200 square feet of grass will be removed. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site: None are known of. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: None are proposed. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals that have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: hawk,heron,eagle, songbirds,mallard,osprey,grebe,goose Mammals: deer,bear,elk,beaver Fish: bass, salmon,trout,herring,shellfish Other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Bald Eagles(threatened)are known to forage in the area and have been seen perched on pilings in Lake Washington. Puget Sound Energy contacted the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife and received a determination dated March 17, 1997, that there are no documented Bald Eagle nests within one mile of the site. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Not to our knowledge. The site does not provide any critical habitat. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None are proposed. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing etc. None. Page 7 ofl 5 ! ! Puget Sound Energy DNR Aquatic Lease Sheetpile Removal Project SEPA Environmental Checklist December 14, 1998 b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: None are proposed. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None are proposed. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Surrounding noise will not affect the proposed sheetpile removal project. However, there is significant noise in the area from the Boeing and Paccar Plants, Renton Airport, Burlington- Northern Railroad and I-405. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Various types of construction equipment, including a barge and barge-mounted crane will create noise on a short-term basis. Sheetpile removal activities will typically occur on weekdays within the City of Renton's designated construction start and stop times. Page 8 of15 ! • Puget Sound Energy DNR Aquatic Lease Sheetpile Removal Project SEPA Environmental Checklist December 14, 1998 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: The proposed project will comply with state noise regulations as adopted by the City of Renton. Construction hours will be limited as described above to ensure that the project does not exceed the maximum permissible noise levels established for construction sites. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The DNR harbor lease area is approximately 31.3 acres of Lake Washington, into which extends approximately 625 lineal feet of sheetpile canal. This leasehold property was used by the adjacent Shuffleton Steam Plant as a harbor for barges. Previous use of the adjacent Shuffleton Steam Plant site was for electric power generation;the plant was last operated in 1989. Currently, an electrical substation, warehouses, and offices occupy the portions of that site that are in use. Uses in the vicinity include heavy industry (Boeing, Paccar Plants,) transportation (Burlington- Northern Railroad, Renton Airport, I-405,) and recreation (Lake Washington, Cedar Park Trail, Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park.) b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No. c. Describe any structures on the site. There is 825 feet of open, sheet-pile supported flume in the harbor area.acts as an extension of the existing cooling water canal from the Shuffleton Steam Plant on the adjacent PSE fee owned land, directing heated water away from the intake. The Shuffleton plant was decommissioned shortly after 1989,and this flume no longer serves in this capacity. The subject improvement is located at the northwest corner of the Shuffleton Steam Plant site (see neighborhood map). The sheetpile supported out-fall discharge channel runs north for 200 feet within PSE fee owned property, then at the northwest corner of PSE property, it turns to the northwest and extends 625 feet into the leased area, adjacent to Boeing's northern property. Behind this portion of the canal is approximately 3 acres of upland area. This upland area was created in 1966/1967, by placing approximately 150,000 cubic yards of dredged sediment from Lake Washington in the area after use as pre-load material in preparation for building construction on Boeing's property. As a result, the existing lake shoreline is bulkheaded with the inboard sheetpile of the discharge channel. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Yes. The existing sheetpiles and cross bracing that form the decommissioned discharge canal will be removed from the site. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? IH-Heavy Industrial Page 9 of15 • • Puget Sound Energy DNR Aquatic Lease Sheetpile Removal Project SEPA Environmental Checklist December 14, 1998 f. What is current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Employment Area-Industrial g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Urban h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify Lake Washington is adjacent/located on the site. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? None. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None are proposed. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: None are proposed. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None are proposed. Page 10 ofl 5 • • Puget Sound Energy DNR Aquatic Lease Sheetpile Removal Project SEPA Environmental Checklist December 14, 1998 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principle exterior building material(s) proposed? N/A b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None are proposed. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Temporary lighting may be required for work at night, particularly if sheetpile removal activities occur in autumn or winter months. Such lighting is not expected to create light or glare impacts to the adjacent properties, and will be removed at the end of the project. Thus there will be no ongoing light or glare impacts. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None are proposed. 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Gene Coulon Park,Lake Washington(boating activities), Cedar River Trail. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. Page 11 ofl5 • • Puget Sound Energy DNR Aquatic Lease Sheetpile Removal Project SEPA Environmental Checklist December 14, 1998 c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None are proposed. 13. Historical and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site? None are known of. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None are proposed. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe the proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The main route to the site includes I-405,Park Ave. N, Garden Ave. N and Lake Washington Blvd. N. Ground access to the site will be from Lake Washington Blvd. N. Water access for the barge equipment will be via Lake Washington. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? N/A c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? No parking spaces will be built or eliminated. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No. Page 12 of15 • • Puget Sound Energy DNR Aquatic Lease Sheetpile Removal Project SEPA Environmental Checklist December 14, 1998 e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. The project is in the vicinity of the Burlington-Northern Railroad, the Renton Airport, and Lake Washington (a large recreational boat launch is adjacent to the project site.) Of these alternative modes of transportation, the project will only use water access—for the barge and barge-mounted crane equipment via Lake Washington. Access for this project will also be by way of the access roads and existing street system. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Removed sheet piling will be transported to a metal recycling facility via truck from the Shuffleton site. The number of round trips is not known but will be limited to the above function only. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: None are proposed. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None are proposed. 16. Utilities a. Utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. Electricity is the only utility available on the site. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed: None are proposed. Page 13 of15 • • Puget Sound Energy DNR Aquatic Lease Sheetpile Removal Project SEPA Environmental Checklist December 14, 1998 C. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: L1` Name Printed:d Kim Lane,Project Manager Date: 1 D✓9i ar 1�-1-- Page 14 ofl 5 • • Puget Sound Energy DNR Aquatic Lease Sheetpile Removal Project SEPA Environmental Checklist December 14, 1998 D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON-PROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering the questions,be aware of the extent of the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish or marine life? 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened, or endangered species, habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land and shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demands are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. Page 15 of15 CIS -(o J ^/C�cn,�, MEMORANDUM ak,,L� , v,J/�l� DATE: 7 • /x/3S TO: Construction Services, Fire Prevention, Plan Review, Project Planner FROM: Jim Hanson, Development Services Division Director SUBJECT: New Preliminary Application: PS Shy Pik rerr,OVeti LOCATION: _ f(, I0 61a-e idritg ` vd.., A ,meeting with the applicant has been scheduled for /O Z 411 , Thursday, for one of the fith floor conference rooms (new city hall)v If this meeting is scheduled at 10:00 AM, the MEETING MUST BE CONCLUDED PRIOR TO 11:00 AM to allow time to prepare for the 11 :00 meeting. Please review the attached project plans prior to the scheduled meeting with the applicant. You will not need to do a thorough "permit level" review at this time. Note only major issues that must be resolved prior to formal land use and/or building permit application submittal. If you are unable to attend the meeting, please send a representative. Please submit your written comments to po,r at least two (2) days before the meeting. Thank you. g/e) 6y� q$ -(oi PENTO;, FIRE DE PPE Pt!F:At' 2 21998 RE MEMORANDUMGH _).. DATE: 7/r�L 9g TO: Construction(( Services, Fire Prevention, Plan Review, Project Planner FROM: Jim Hanson, Development Services Division Director SUBJECT: New Preliminary Application: PS sheet ?// ret70✓ai LOCATION: /070 I5/cx i f-&&- ik)at vd. A�-neeting with the applicant has been scheduled for PVC 4*1 , Thursday, , U Cr"- for one of the 6th floor conference rooms (new city haIIW If this meeting is scheduled at 10:00 AM, the MEETING MUST BE CONCLUDED PRIOR TO 11 :00 AM to allow time to prepare for the 11 :00 meeting. Please review the attached project plans prior to the scheduled meeting with the applicant. You will not need to do a thorough "permit level" review at this time. Note only major issues that must be resolved prior to formal land use and/or building permit application submittal. If you are unable to attend the meeting, please send a representative. � Please submit your written comments to / ��ur at least two (2) days before the meeting. Thank you. IV�1 ca;,_ I CO ref iu� �iA71 • °J$ -!o JU MEMORANDUM DATE: 7/ /9 TO: Construction Services, Fire Prevention, Plan Review, Project Planner FROM: Jim Hanson, Development Services Division Director SUBJECT: New Preliminary Application: PS ,Sheet f'/I'e reti?ovPa. LOCATION: li)) .6/61 ! )lG�- 14.)ajair 1 ✓L l/ A neeting with the applicant has been scheduled for /01X *0 , Thursday, C711-- for one of the 6th floor conference rooms (new city hall) If this meeting is scheduled at 10:00 AM, the MEETING MUST BE CONCLUDED PRIOR TO 11:00 AM to allow time to prepare for the 11 :00 meeting. Please review the attached project plans prior to the scheduled meeting with the applicant. You will not need to do a thorough "permit level" review at this time. Note only major issues that must be resolved prior to formal land use and/or building permit application submittal. If you are unable to attend the meeting, please send a representative. Please submit your written comments to )a at least two (2) days before the meeting. Thank you. iJo cowl W1tKiL . CITY OF RENTON Planning / Building / Public Works MEMORANDUM DATE: August 6, 1998 TO: Pre-Application File FROM: Peter Rosen, Senior Planner SUBJECT: PSE Sheet Pile Removal- Pre-Application File No. 98-61 Zoning. The site is zoned Heavy Industrial (IH). The proposal does not involve building and development standards of the IH zone are inapplicable to the proposal. Permit Requirements. The proposal would require SEPA environmental review and most likely a Shorelines Substantial Development Permit. The SEPA review would take approximately 8 weeks, including the appeal period. After the appeal period, a Shorelines Permit would be issued by the t,ity and sent to Department of Ecology (DOE) for their review. There is a 21 day appeal period for the Shoreline Permit,which commences after DOE issues receipt of the permit. SEPA Environmental Review: SEPA environmental review is required because the proposal is considered an action "undertaken on lands covered by water." A SEPA environmental checklist must be submitted with the application materials. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) will review the proposal, potentially require mitigation measures, and issue a threshold determination. Shorelines Substantial Development Permit: It is likely that a Shorelines Substantial Development Permit will be required. However, demolition activities are exempt from Shoreline requirements, as distinguished from the definition of "development.' I have requested an interpretation from the State DOE as to whether the subject proposal could be considered demolition and therefore exempted from Shoreline regulations. cc: Jana Huerter PSE Sheet Pile Removal.doc MEMORANDUM JUL 2 1 1998 DATE: �� f cw: tic',ygpe '. TO: Long Range Planning FROM: Jim Hanson, Development Services Division Director SUBJECT: New Preliminary Application: PSt- 5)ee pik /'eii LOCATION: / /no 6eoCk'1 A r3f A( Please review the attached preliminary project plans for consistency with applicable Comprehensive Plan Policies. Ple se submit y written comments to ffk�''��.[ n no later than o r . Thank you. We will not be able to include comments received after this date in the presentation/summary we prepare for the applicant. NO JOl.1C , ECOA rnAL 22e .1 c 2n o, - PUGET • SOUND ENERGY 'vF ,4/7- January 19, 1999 14% 'QFiy�L94,N� 2s Oti tie City of Renton Development Services Division //j� 1055 South Grady Way Q Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Puget Sound Energy's DNR Aquatic Lease Sheetpile Removal Project Environmental Review Application Submittal Dear Permit Reviewer, Enclosed with this letter is the environmental review application for Puget Sound Energy's (PSE) DNR Aquatic Lease Sheetpile Removal Project. The permit application includes the following required information: • Twelve copies of signed and notarized Master Application form (including original) • Twelve copies of signed Environmental Checklist (including original) • Two sets of mailing labels of all property owners within at least 300' of the site boundary • Two copies of signed and notarized List of Surrounding Property Owners form (including original) • Five copies of pre-application meeting review memos • Twelve copies of project narrative • Twelve copies of Neighborhood Detail Map • Twelve copies of Site Plan • One 8 ' " x 11" Site Plan reduction • One 8 ' " x 11" Neighborhood Detail Map reduction • One 4" x 6" Neighborhood Detail Map reduction • One Color Display Map of the Site Plan • One Color Display Map of the Neighborhood Detail Map • Environmental Review Fee of$1,000 (project located in Lake Washington) + postage of$5.76 For your information, PSE is submitting Joint Aquatic Resource Permit Applications for this project for Hydraulic Project Approval, Section 401 Water Quality Certification, Approval to Allow Temporary Exceedance to Water Quality Standards, Aquatic Resources Use Authorization Notification, and a Corps of Engineer's Section 10 Permit. • City of Renton Development Services Division January 19, 1999 Page 2 I hope that the enclosed materials satisfy the City's submittal requirements for the environmental review application. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at (425) 462-3173. Thank you very much for your help in processing our permit. Sincerely, U Kim Lane Project Manager Enclosures PUG ET SOUND ENERGY January 19, 1999 City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Puget Sound Energy's DNR Aquatic Lease Sheetpile Removal Project Shoreline Exemption Application Submittal Dear Permit Reviewer, Enclosed with this letter is the Shoreline Exemption application for Puget Sound Energy's (PSE) DNR Aquatic Lease Sheetpile Removal Project. The permit application includes the following required information: • Four copies of signed and notarized Master Application form (including original) • One copy of pre-application meeting review memos • Four copies of project narrative • Four copies of letter from Department of Fish and Wildlife dated January 13, 1999 • Four copies of Neighborhood Detail Map • Four copies of Site Plan For your information, PSE is submitting this Shoreline Exemption application concurrently with the Environmental Review application submittal. PSE will also be submitting Joint Aquatic Resource Permit Applications for this project for Hydraulic Project Approval, Section 401 Water Quality Certification, Approval to Allow Temporary Exceedance to Water Quality Standards, Aquatic Resources Use Authorization Notification, and a Corps of Engineer's Section 10 Permit. I hope that the enclosed materials satisfy the City's submittal requirements for the environmental review application. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at (425) 462-3173. Thank you very much for your help in processing our permit. Sincerely, ln..� DEVELOPMENT Pl-AN,;0,"1G Crri OF RENTON Kim Lane 2 1999Project Manager FEB Enclosures RECEIVED tr State of Washington DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE Raynor 4 Olke: 18018 1MII Cm**HON1rvard-MI Cmak,Washingfo^98012-(42b)775-1311 January 13, 1999 Puget Sound Energy ATTENTION: Kim Lane Post Office Box 97034 OI3C-14N Bellevue, Washington 98004-9734 Dear Mr.T_ane: SUBJECT: Shuffleton Decommissioning,DNR Leasehold Sheetpile Removal,Lake Washington,Tributary to Ship Canal,King County,WRIA 08.I•KWA The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife(WDFW)has performed a preliminary review of the above-referenced project and provides the following comments. Vertical sheetpile bulkheads arc generally detrimental to fish habitat due to the loss of shallow water littoral areas which results from their construction. The removal of the sheetpiles at this location is a prime opportunity to restore some of the habitat which was lost near the mouth of the Cedar River when the site was filled and industrialized. WDFW expects this habitat to be used by juvenile salmonid fish, including Puget Sound wild chinook salmon(which are proposed for federal listing as a threatened species), as well as by other fish species in Lake Washington. WDFW believes this is the type of opportunity which will make a real difference in determining whether salmon productivity can be restored in Puget Sound. With the above frame of reference, WDFW believes that the project can be designed to provide a significant amount of good quality shoreline and littoral habitat. As much littoral zone as possible with a minimum slope of 3:1 is desirable to provide refuge and rearing areas for juvenile fish. This slope can be tapered into a steeper slope as the retained shcctpilcs arc approached_ Some armoring may be necessary in this transitional area to provide stability. in order to make a fair cut slope to fill ratio(at least for the majority of the site which is not constrained by other factors such as the proposed trail and the area used by the Boeing Company),the slope should be measured from the midpoint between the lake bed and the ordinary high water line,rather than the top of the fill. A revegetation plan should be designed to provide suitable habitat for the fish and wildlife resources which utilize the shoreline. This is an important critical habitat for salmonid fish, particularly since juvenile fish leaving the Cedar River are dependent upon ncarshore areas during their early life histories. LDPMN NIG�• Oe\I c,.l i pF MaLane ngy 3, 1999 Page 2 Thank you for the opportunityuesti�ns, please to provide this information. If you have any Q contact me at(425)649-7042. Sincerely, Larry Fisher Area Habitat Biologist LF:lf:pseshaf.g 94 -(01 MEMORANDUM iv„ U DATE: 7,/Q2D//$ TO: Construction Services, Fire Prevention, Plan Review, Project Planner FROM: Jim Hanson, Development Services Division Director SUBJECT: New Preliminary Application: {�S� SM2 Pile ral/Ovati LOCATION: /(00 l�1GY�. fC.k— 1� /'vct - A ming with the applicant has been scheduled for /01 X , Thursday, f {eet for one of the 6th floor conference rooms (new city hall) If this meeting is scheduled at 10:00 AM, the MEETING MUST BE CONCLUDED PRIOR TO 11:00 AM to allow time to prepare for the 11 :00 meeting. Please review the attached project plans prior to the scheduled meeting with the applicant. You will not need to do a thorough "permit level" review at this time. Note only major issues that must be resolved prior to formal land use and/or building permit application submittal. If you are unable to attend the meeting, please send a representative. Please submit your written comments to fi° at least two (2) days before the meeting. Thank you. NOG N OPt'1`�NFz`c ON —2") C FZ ciS -to1 PENTO:' FIRE. D` -lr, rkc v-N,1,:i':eop Al. JUL. 2 21998 MEMORANDUM - i \FE } DATE: 7/ O/9S TO: Construction Services, Fire Prevention, Plan Review, Project Planner FROM: Jim Hanson, Development Services Division Director SUBJECT: New Preliminary Application: PS. Shy Pi/- retrieval LOCATION: A:00 /h/Ci , f-a/ - 1'()Q .�lr �iG'C' /V A eeting with the applicant has been scheduled for /9(Z API , Thursday, /Ceti,..- for one of the 6th floor conference rooms (new city hall) If this tif meeting is scheduled at 10:00 AM, the MEETING MUST BE CONCLUDED PRIOR TO 11:00 AM to allow time to prepare for the 11 :00 meeting. Please review the attached project plans prior to the scheduled meeting with the applicant. You will not need to do a thorough "permit level" review at this time. Note only major issues that must be resolved prior to formal land use and/or building permit application submittal. If you are unable to attend the meeting, please send a representative. p� Please submit your written comments to iae"' j-L1---__) at least two (2) days before the meeting. Thank you. /00 ci.,14,_ 1 I ea frifiltc; /2z/?g ,/e2-1_ ____ 915 -col . I MEMORANDUM DATE: 77491 TO: Construction Services, Fire Prevention, Plan Review, Project Planner FROM: Jim Hanson, Development Services Division Director SUBJECT: New Preliminary Application: PS P/k r ov-a LOCATION: Apo157ork, f-a/(2- )()atilLei i Gxvi'L A meeting with the applicant has been scheduled for P(x , Thursday, AC,,-. for one of the 6th floor conference rooms (new city hall) if this eeting is scheduled at 10:00 AM, the MEETING MUST BE CONCLUDED PRIOR TO 11:00 AM to allow time to prepare for the 11 :00 meeting. Please review the attached project plans prior to the scheduled meeting with the applicant. You will not need to do a thorough "permit level" review at this time. Note only major issues that must be resolved prior to formal land use and/or building permit application submittal. If you are unable to attend the meeting, please send a representative. Please submit your written comments to 0- J at least two (2) days before the meeting. Thank you. Jok)id 66141 -7 ZLt/ g CITY OF RENTON Planning / Building / Public Works MEMORANDUM DATE: August 6, 1998 .TO: Pre-Application File FROM: Peter Rosen, Senior Planner SUBJECT: PSE Sheet Pile Removal - Pre-Application File No. 98-61 Zoning. The site is zoned Heavy Industrial (IH). The proposal does not involve building and development standards of the IH zone are inapplicable to the proposal. Permit Requirements. The proposal would require SEPA environmental review and most likely a Shorelines Substantial Development Permit. The SEPA review would take approximately 8 weeks, including the appeal period. After the appeal period, a Shorelines Permit would be issued by the Gity and sent to Department of Ecology (DOE) for their review. There is a 21 day appeal period for the Shoreline Permit, which commences after DOE issues receipt of the permit. SEPA Environmental Review: SEPA environmental review is required because the proposal is considered an action "undertaken on lands covered by water." A SEPA environmental checklist must be submitted with the application materials. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) will review the proposal, potentially require mitigation measures, and issue a threshold determination. Shorelines Substantial Development Permit: It is likely that a Shorelines Substantial Development Permit will be required. However, demolition activities are exempt from Shoreline requirements, as distinguished from the definition of "development." I have requested an interpretation from the State DOE as to whether the subject proposal could be considered demolition and therefore exempted from Shoreline regulations. cc: Jana Huerter PSE Sheet Pile Removal.doc q8 -to 1 MEMORANDUM Tp 1�---- ' JULZ1998 DATE: 7� 1 TO: Long Range Planning FROM: Jim Hanson, Development Services Division Director ,.,Q SUBJECT: New Preliminary Application: PS ,S2id pik ref11, "`^- LOCATION: / /06 66Daci 5/1 A( Please review the attached preliminary project plans for consistency with applicable Comprehensive Plan Policies. Ple se submit yo r written comments to fe1-( ' J o ivi no later than . Thank you. We will not be able to include comments received after this date in the presentation/summary we prepare for the applicant. NO -)0 (. i 5 S\1 L-r3 6,0 Fc:.2 S r r put-l EC nc 4c- cn-on,1- DUPLICATE RECEIPT DUPLICATE RECEIPT CITY OF RENTON CITY TREASURER REG/RCPT : 02-41327 C:02-25-1999 CASHIER ID : J 89:52:00 A:02-25-1999 8880 MISCELLANEOUS REV C1.800.80 ENVIRONMENTAL FEE 000.000.80.345.81.00.000007 8000 MISCELLANEOUS REV $1.98 POSTAGE 008.000.05.519.90.42.000001 7060 UTILITIES PAYMENT $160.81 15-436D 7060 UTILITIES PAYMENT $20.40 15-4370 7060 UTILITIES PAYMENT $2.255.30 25-2350 TOTAL DUE $3.438.49 CHECK $3.436.51 CASH $1.98 TOTAL TENDERED $3.438.49 CHANGE DUE $0.00 DUPLICATE RECEIPT DUPLICATE RECEIPT VELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS LAND USE PERMIT SUBMITTAL WAIVED MODIFIED COMMENTS: REQUIREMENTS: BY: BY: _ Calculations, Survey, Drainage Control Plan z ;(PI!✓ Drainage Report 2 ,,14J 9 Elevations, Architectural a AND 4 Elevations, Grading 2 A.)K,UV Existing Covenants (Recorded Copy)4 Existing Easements (Recorded Copy) 4 Flood Plain Map, if applicable Floor Plans 3AND4 0 Geotechnical Report 2 AND 3 rt? 6R Grading Plan, Conceptual 2 Grading Plan, Detailed 2kli King County Assessor's Map Indicating Site 4 Landscaping Plan, Conceptual4 Legal Description 4 List of Surrounding Property Owners 4 Mailing Labels for Property Owners 4 Map of Existing Site.,Conditions 4 Master Application Form 4 Monument Cards (one per monument) Parking, Lot Coverage & Landscaping Analysis 4 Plan Reductions (PMTs) 4 Postage 4 Public Works Approval Letter2 Title Report or Plat Certificate 4 Topography Map (5' contours)3 nn 'A/ Traffic Study 2 l ;Pt) Tree CuttingNegetation Clearing Plan 4 Utilities Plan, Generalized 2 1/V _ Wetlands Delineation Map4 Ck? 2 — Wetlands Planting Plan 4 Wetlands Study 4 This requirement may be waived by: ` ` �/� 1. Property Services Section PROJECT NAME: �tL1_ I Y l�LL �[,\ oVA, 1 2. Public Works Plan Review Section 3. Building Section DATE: 2 r25 (77 — 4. Development Planning Section h:\division.s\develop.ser\dev.plan.ing\war xl PIP , 2. • SNUFFL. ON 'DECO P- -t S'0 NA i NCi k1JL t'ZI t he, L\e\ t s or- SwE. -r pi t- . Fik-10v t. MICRUIIIILMED ;4161.4 L!MK,E, WAS t N..k C.'r 0 tic tit0erH Ile.M.-vF_ ou srec. .-czD S ,F-ct.%t- t. P0-1O c... oS S 6 cA.4C. t c &— `z1t. OF- PSE. p.-i O 13OE{Nett P(2.0 Pf(Z(`( L1 a N eE ma I..L SF .rPtt \ /�� 144(Z 00C i `-MUL 2 ig. ----------j'' '''- tr.,‘I 91v l- II y i PS E al wv D Coe‘NC, T.i ( T.)P RcP Ei�i 1 0 .,., 1, F .......„..... C.ON CR2E-I rti 11 ,..._- ._.- \lT S ENT P � ti D� of REN�pN 0 CO ' — �P1t SLcltic — gw W E..,:*tS- 11--VI A 0.7"C Pt Le- Ii. cc c,1 0 . V,S ga2My GoQPs • Ret-ka4E S.NA,t.k-'C Pik-Tr-S /s*.4.O a. L0LI4,So pA'TvM C O$ P�P.AGft ZA C--------:S � L,pn�F Z; 3 . , ..� z�; --____ _.._ _ ��._.\-4. 21.6 \... It 7,...t ,..... — — , rl �— M Z1. M P 11b y '1 CvT „,,� 2: c3ELovN. l'In^O Itr......, (,._� -. d — .75 , a,eL c.�6,02 t F ` ` F !-1Pti. c - ozi L..-i tilCL o �� y'� ,Se' , !L Mc. 1 2: \ $k OP c.,,, 1 ,,,,,>. Li) C, r , � f, �'� + ` ' LA t" _ '4I-Olt St+-r z 4- of 4- E141ST► 4(3 SVA.E. zl PILE. (A-4.64.t,, -• Oct .j &_ PR.0Powb3 4E41( a ( µOrr Mb-(bV t t.T) --T - 12'x 12- Buu.. cZA 1 L 2 0' L A K` I wASNINvT< V v 8 w- 2g • LOGAT:O4- NO*MAL. W.►T1iR �L . Iv N '4 n .ZS s1-RYATON 1.6' ? 'J A I y, i .o :... 4 - �i Al'l0' ‘, V I , �h RENTON ',,Z in 1.110 W. P AAUNICIPAL� c STEEL BRACE �T MY Zy Z AiRpoRT `�. y P/LC i10 -STEEL SHEET P/L/N6�, � � � ; li 1 F :r --� o. e 0 EL,IC). I J o0 7 JS Y g f- - % t'MiN. COV=t, 4. p Y4 lit. 1 !' "4- SCALE IN /• , ;I . 11-,.r ss • « i `.-Q- LA Kli LOCAT!Ot'• MA 0 s 10 20 • SCALA 1N FUMY - SECT ION A-A \° I .7 A" 014:\ty.° . 4‘.'' 'eV LAKE WASHING;TON -- i• "7" d S-7 PILL W 00 - OOI.i�MIN• • M,11111 '7 - :- - 41,g,7 . 43 - °~ P1 PROPERTY OF ;� '' CITY OF 'RENTON • oreitigkIt. - s'wine UNLOADING . ,' .ilk......\,„ pica. (G1..le) w/ 1-p1�01 ' INNER HARBOR PROPERTY OF �� C►� OF �y� .4 LINE PSP4L c -% 2 SHORE LINE �1s • .\ ELEVATIONS REFER, TO BOO ' IO 1 . \ (DATUM WHICH IS 7.42' BELO' V PROPERTY OFUSC B DATUM OF,DATU OF, 1929 - PI ISA • THE BOEING COMPANY . - OF 1947 ( UNDER PURCHASE AGM'T PROPOSED WATER. OUT 'LOW FROM P S P 4 L ) DIVERSION .STRUCTL Z.E. LAKE WASHINGTON AT I EtJTC • pl.niiLT 000140 pOwiag. et LIGHT COMPN • O �M� G�[1ld�e1►1, t146i•,�W.JO OWaT+gss+r 6stao .....:Noma giMMN A•sucap TL/Aciese • LLB IN FAT • P L A N o..,m= r... ✓.L.c. etoN , II I .27 o 0 Tkn y 7f ' (1, vO q o>v O 4 ilizeiN5 Tt t . tr 41" 1 I it, ZrA...a Rom (I ' CFI at', i:....The.. F'-')(k ST 1 ac, So IC.. 3 t5 (l t or I \ � I "S I c' �� irima/ \`: --AIM. . II IP 3 Q • Af(2.07. '/z DMA. of 2OC.C..) l; o I 1 11 o I I t J T il o cA" • Z; 1 s�oPE 2 y�cc. s 1, Li 10 = rz.E s-rocrs.a to - -- ) 0. z a o U `y' CC- w 0 3 4:4E...4 D p,g-,ruQtt)�,O w\1 ut ' LL.ov Are-eAS S-1.6u f S op-, 2` . O,L. �--- 11. �..=..:. C.f. 11 R - 25� 1 II �� t!t II 1 I 2'D I �. �� ]. -:_w; i r I I M'o Polk or out.) I ►, `rjSt. I 15 -r I� ( '�f Cfw. +b1 '..- I 1 s 1,1 II ,n Q II I I ‘3 i 1 1 i £lc ', I' ` i %IQ- 14') -= ��I v 7s . 11 1 i P II II ; II 1 I g Li\ 11 J 1 G c: . —1 t ,... f 1 • -. I I 0 ,.n T"� � y S I ' 11 c'1'Ir1•o Ord 11 1 ., .a ..S ( e-Z , II ' /t--. t ;•;1 II 11 • -, 'Q 72- cyst" S ►vi, clo-In VC 1 tA yrcn -73.‘-'v1 VI3 Nat !4 9, �O 1. cY 2 T cG