Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
LUA99-029
LAW / KINGDON, INC. Architects • Engineers . Planners / ";withro-es.:.Alt,..' ::. / t.s1/ I .-111111 CANDLE — i , ,1 rot «� y. ,k ift , - -.---- --•■■ -- -Miaow— imp- al- las . ---.---- ---- Nil ill ilel .4t5 \-1,1t; 4- . ♦ w• • • ` as -'_ - - . - - - - ` i. _-. s. .. x • 1,r .k 'r1 mot. ,t:. ,•eJ .w '4,A`n7. '4, ' R!.� ' - ✓ �Q� ','. :t' < •' :--, :at't'°._ \ �� •7r , .;• ( :tt? Te•s•i 4'L °a,, __-._ iC1L•s, ` `,'12`.••.rr. • .. :+ ,��," . . ♦ z �yS�. y+. ‘ • • �.,�. '.,,, ';.�r 1.i —'T' ^ -.. I ii.[ F30 'Tf '' + •� �.�-" F • 1 ,<.: •r a`ri'mot+,[ .1, _,. -_r'.F:_— 'i • �•I f .. T _Li T f aa , y 1 j+ �.�.�. !- 1 _ , - D �y, 4l ;r .<4 ; _ _ I �r �! 74, A"• y•.Z.. .'' • a , fir, },, a "\, 'I:i FRONT ELEVATION (SOUTH) ivimpoo„. i_ , y MIMI Will !A■i .rr• ■■■■ •■Mir; art I ■■ . ^.1■9 .. CANDI,EWC47D -rrw aMir■ ::n nets :::: l ■■=I■ ■rrr 1 i ■i:i �:: y:: �rw arrr ■■ I r •■ - ■•rr i err ilia �r +u w,a°o .- * ' J•Mir -1 mum rr. _-■ ■ -..-- _sou JJ•■ - ■ ■ r■r■ •. ■■iw _-..•Mir■ -'97A .+. * ■■■■ on me i ■� aii� :::: _■ Mine■ �{.. ■■ ■■ - r . y �3 : 3=■■ ■■.r 1 r■ w M t 'r r �. :::: •■ •r ■ i ■•■ MINIM uu MINN ■u■ I I:: 1 Min ^<. ; , ti^ y i. _ LY' , ' L— 4 I I— �_ I— -. I—_ ` , �I r - c iam :• e= � �' _■ * � � , is Mir■ nil « fit ., . • , ' ► �.1; F #_ L I L-- 11, J y;'. r Y� ~T s r y '` alig� r t1_ ;. c ( rA { = m j [��(j��!r �r. ..,n ,' " ^s�' d i. . 3. '..r, ,.` •T 'yy ,+{ �...'y"! L:i_ 1 I L _ _ ._ y�•?',r , r■■ L'1� � � r,.,T�•. { 1 A'!;, ,r.y . f SIDE ELEVATION (WEST) CANDLEWGDD S U I T E S L U 0 0 0 O° 0 0 0 Q 0 0 ® O r PRINTS ISSUED 3,1'-0"OCT TO CUT DE FRAM 20•Fa1NOA0. / WASH-SLOPE 1/3" DA1F PURPOSE NO Sp_p• ,w-P 1.'-0" 1.'-0" te'-0" i.'-0" 1B'-0" 3•-0 b'-0" M'-a 3A-O 1A0K0" \ :�8.CMU BOND BEAM 11/11gB .OPP.RENEW ""D' x'y0 2.0",3'-0"3'�p']`D" 1 D;1'_py ,x'-D" yA'-D�3 D" 51Upa CMu rN9DEr :III'. RCrNFDEVERY'Cry p5[A-W'� x/15/- 4,[ PLAN APPROVAL T l r l T OF ENCLOSURE O - _us.� — �QS _ WF _ SOS..'"_ �QS _ WPC MM ws.DS • .�� re' VE _ ELF .. y RE no D 'l ,E All lir " 01 [SWIE .� -� —t�. �4 y I+B.• FiNISN Bu DNGES COAT TO MArCN 1 _ B/.i 3 B/ 3 B/�D1i 3 C/ ] pup] /Ai1E E/.11 E,U,1 /•t 2 I•- B.R.5 SMOOTH FACE C M U.9 I . 1151�I M M _ - M �. I OLT PENS CELLS -. ■Y C 1 • 11�I - .c x 11 11 L - - ���! - _ ` - ,� - niEK /?1/x'vREuaDEO i ONT[LLER �'11 I i.t' ` - . , III: G TOP OF CURB.. R I/�I/�I1ry1CTI EN�'I Ip❑IIp'1RII o .. `'IMF I Is lrA N■ e.i Isulra ■■.1I/11 �. 11■ �.-,1= ,,, ,,,,, lll(. -= •_ -11I--111r• - = J E-CaNC SL.B- If CA PAINING LDr full VW,JJ 1J flVII: © � - 0 xR[F - = 111. - -_ ._ .C q%Al.- �_ ^ o - LUIB.iE•.END OF wALL 14, ■V�I1 �I R� n n��au us��n■ dal1�v • au e5 1 r NO 1' _ _ _ REVISIONS _ �- _ CONC FOUNDATION DATE TIO r,r, S5 7;'. II G ELEv It�I H■ , .1 .. _, 11 11 G �G�i _, SIB. _ . 0 - R' �LRUCT SIXt Sr2E INf - LI M.II WI u .4 �I� I� a \ -f- .. La.nON OF RErNF p1 Y� ELEv.3 6. & III J SUITE �A SU0 SINE r2 : �- 'm I; x .. 8 = =y,o s ; STUD, E/.1 Ep13 L 1 E/•13 SECTION THRU WALL _ LOB AT TRASH ENCLOSURE O° ; , 1 SPFN0L[ , =DS Y = r i .- __,e I/1-.1._0• //- ds Ds" ds D's Row M1SSr6G ROOM MA ,N SALES II 8- NO 0f ST.IOT•SUITES ON ORST FLOOR.18 TOTAL NO 00 STUDIOS•SUITES ON 41•FLOORS.133 S'.B . ECmIC4 J6 0"_ 5-6" WN°fCitGTYPE 1P00i15 IB PAXt).♦ OTk x0 UNITS. 8S JI 511} O FIRST FLOOR PLAN MSTUITE FLOOR AR.NITS -1•B B5 pF, .8T4 NO"CDxE N s,B PAIR,.1E SNA A' '+-w©'y►�. R. •LANDSCAPING TOTAL•a.D ALL FOR FLOORS s11B SEE CINL -60.T21 5 SOFT II yp0 ���. a (WI) N.N .P �15 STUDIOTOTAL B/ �. \ (.u3) NITS U * FLDOR IE12L 5 ONST p SUITES IB LAUNDRY L. ^ HANDICAP «TN ¢ SECOND n B Js O . ' .. :1 _ ! («rJ) - HEAPING IM AIPEp 5 T,ACCESSIBLE UNITS �0 xT B J5 2 •CCESO&E UNITS FOUR. 12 B 35 TOTAL 101 33 133 ISIIII6, I / oI S. I,„ I• a%�1 D ■■`� N 1-.1-.,�/� IIWW ppUU CCO�ON m°M E E_y • .1.-C. -- DAvo L HCc,MAM.MA ARCHITECT Will E I" • o sn.GLf CO.H GR R(MOESwNAx mtl -41: ne.1,� RNE,N`VAAA.KS 6_T2203 �,; a us ATE LOCA. I- ' :' II a/.l� '� Yw+x, �w _ ._B 1[ B U<, I111!"IIIINII /�II Via_ °' ■ e1 ;r=1 LI= 1..^. ti� n li nn �ao�IY Ro,iP:d;1 G�04 f�aOG3l'AE 0DN OUT tl ����I ��� 1�� CoaSTRUCTooa D fR D CR , P•N ,I !I,a . DBB. rao W. ODE D LIT n . . . of :N ,� Il����ill o : wl II -� cum, aEF,D 1 D PANNE. ® 6. G 'A w�D 2 SECTION THROUGH I .BI— _ ,TOP n III sT/wA1r z ©©©©©—1 it nl .°.L.B0 w o 0 'A - ORE sLEE.cs L y i iTOu//OH/A. -- CHECKED WASHER PAD & DRAIN L I(1)C•aw PL•,ED B0.TS PER BOARD €Rw aarzC FDR I olujDl GATE ELEVATION AT V V 1 TRASH ENCLOSURE - I, B/A,.3 '•1. 'Z''' II SEE CIVIL Oa.NLS O j s14411 . 4 ■ •r RAWT NNE FA E D B DD CANDLEVVOD s ■,'O I SUITES l L ¢N n SL.B "STEEL POST s c" 3WATOM.NA INCPQJ jig D - wZ B•BAPSwi ,i PLANT •Q-.., •� �p x fr R CEDAR ITS' LADE 0 'Tit: II �' 1�� MATS Lo+ER CFs coal a Nmr < .1 �iaL O. 'r: = =' . .. :'I' -+ S -.- -1', s.NAILER W TOP.BOTT 1(�MAMEL(INN= poJeo • SLOPE It MO MID POINT J Fa PROJECT NUMBER -. :C I� 1/Oro• 00T>I \ "� II e/:pz nz I� 0 6 P S. MOOT m7 F' 'i1192 Es B ,.R[sAWN BPS PRELIMINARY au2i la • I 1T9 I..I..EIn ~ f.rFs OHMMAS A M «.Ro WLOOK ATTACHED TO x:. ��� FIRST FLOOR PLAN 11,■h M w NT{EI F 5 i� BB-10• HOGE 22 00200�,W0Ex SHEET mu 0 , -'y OS iL'I- LOIEW rF TOP MOT•MrD PONT CiNIEv 1010.1•'LONG SHEET NUMBER riO THE HOTEL NOTCH CEDARA BOARD POST•CATESFRAME A BOLT n E B PLAN OF TRASH ENCLOSURE_RE 2 PLAN OF GATES AT TRASH CONTAINER ENCLOSURE Lo Ae-o OUT To OJT OF FNMA.•FOUNDATION 0 B> OE—SHEETS Z 11.1" 0 O' O6 OO O PRINTS i55VED xo.?Arz PURPOSE — 3/36/M SITE PLAN APPROVAL .DS f a D ryp0 rz BS • B%p'] MS B/A�ro B/.t 3 B/.1 2 STUDIO OM 3 [/.t 3 [�/a 3 a ,!, O�/EA E/AtE1 , Y 11l r - - EI FOR (/Iy�ry1�'CT}�p(I(� 7❑I�I(y� S A•I I• • sI Is UA •I 11 •. I - A•I I•• �I- • [Mi. II A _ •G • I 1- I A :R"R FUR CNIJIIIUCIION: RENSFION$ o---- — EN i4 ▪ 1� L. 1111 . -'—I:' .I L.AI MI Z _ 1/4Ih1 I=II�. •E Cis::::. .AV NMI V 7 a Ds DATE PAD a Ga it a ELF P3 ,!. As ABtn/IDAi� LOBBvelV2 P 1 B/DADi 2 ?A2 /p °s = _ _ —Dry _ of—N �� 65 • 65 = t'g TELL. ODIIII II A VDEO Rx CPP�iCE II B 0 — _ _ A SECOND FLOOR PLAN h SECOND FLOM D•T DOVNT (DOM A MORTIS^P) I o F A A P D.RD o PanM nooRs.M P uu r-w'-o SSUM TUDIOu is 0 lypq TOTALrn xi IAL PO OF us II B/AI2 .7 7 SND�D/Ai.3 M CONI it TOTAL AREA Of SE FLOOR • 16.635 SOFT . . B (RxRD AND fOURM EACH ALERACE 16635 50.fi) I IL& I! L B/�t 3 !I DAVID L.HOFFMAN,AIA E. 30 16,6176370 lB 4N >v: 1 fi P IIi 1701 r a:°� ii 0NOV FOR lio '; r a 1 I` C©ONSTRUCTO© I! 1701 g ta a;:t 3 !I8 o i - t •II.3 Immwomir DRAM SMOKED O ' M — CANDLEWCID O _: c2 I S U I T E S r:,I I... UMW WA.M1111N7EON II o I: — ,..:::= ;' PRO:ECi MAMA loJBO s ` li a 97�.$ it Mums(.ara.ee O rn!_ 1._:z y5 •7 1 rli, D1 PRELIMINARY R SECOND ELOO PLAN © Illiiiil" 1 S4ESHE. 61 POWER B- V OF_SNEFR ip 00 : i L.,,P LS ir e " ,� I :i V 1 ' "a u o °o •47. OQO •oo' :: ' 0i it 1 1 ::::o- o•:ffll .:i g a o �1 �ol o1 NI; I F! 9ri,Dip e.l��11 �i 1 �II�1 \1:t 1 A 1 o 1 1 1 \ 88 °° [111100-4 t 2MItli: ;- . \ - [ 0. 0 I _. _ :z. -�/�/ r '� • �001 o1 !pi,N 1z I ' �?�� tom o- Wx 4=L::1 ®1 1 II FFF1 i I I �.� j ®1 �1 ®1 E. 1 1F 100�`�\ S 1 .ii o-l:.:=:j\ 7 I;• 1E1 ii E a N. cY \ o II , III W ..0 I:::: :: ®1 :::. co !Iro a I 1 NI ii lt'_[\ 0 - -- I II L `f3 s °Q o\ ■� 1 1 1 1..II :_'=r\ fa l l ill /' fig II8°.i.�\ ::1 �1 ' IIN1 O. -\ 4i‘l Iff.a\ I MI MI M +:,8 8 goo I �; 8 8 i9, •oo lc \ iiiiiii =11 1iiiiiiiii iii-111 , '- - ;iiiiini = @p F 9: 2FA 2Gd @a@ id S fe2` fd2 f S Z 0 0 O O V ZO a mi W G $1 a Y ao J a S@ V w ..A z D 6s1 S Hi c6 A n ,0222 co LLy 1L 77: J W 000 a eoee f/) J a_ _ WH k 1 o Ii i i i lbGX J ill sifd"� #��,5 i s: $ lg 86'§h-alt:I IT Hl°e"'34 5. a J _ a;eat tg as it: t t§igaP. 0,it itg: :ipla PNNOM SIi c _TT >-ice '— .......7""'....G owl., ��\�--�II��— i � rvecs, o,r.c sw. 10 a 1000L 0. :_ _ _ ►PPLIF ILO Ull �� /% t OM MR..w... __P . RIVASICNS , 7 t FOR CCCIRUCPO:', OM noi ma � � \ �� nrwooG w*rr Q PAM MAN MO Mt(.111011.01.amela N wooG wrtcr WA,�G" I v P�o,onKve� ► M + ..,�.cmu ,sdaa . P - ` I N_ai L� � �. milk; - , , ,,:, a i more. .� C/i 0. . I.� • Lj IIac, a—wa.P i Q ....on0 10P OP MACE ib 40, / \ te,.. _ ...M.. -zifgwrd, OISF- I , fir. iay L ,.} a& 4 0001014 Ell 1111111.111.11.".-4,) , / IV A. I — -- �R\ ';1\_ •R��_L4 4 1�! %�f' — .k°v "s o POLE BASE DETAIL — _`-- 1� u:\ I t]3FIXTURE TYPE A2' -- -- - .:-- w =wa►����>a-.... " NOT FOR ro�a b CONTRUCTION b ':.4 I6t- STr2EEI _ ._— v v ---- 50 Z SITE LIGHTING P A Sv �kJk U o „ra rmA.,co DRAM. ORALS m b owa swa k jm.111..,a�ilcN'�i51 ...a mbellopt a..fao0001 p.lase MO.YICAO �N�(.wc..0 c a0cm/i0) — ^awt LIGHTING FIXTURE SCHEDULE ..a.ro . ,. PAP nso aus MO TOMLETTERoEssG. YNIIFACTIGOI CATMDG WUIW VOLTAGE N0. nsE MOUNTING PNI91 rim GAM MOMS LAMPS crawl.u.re.a. 1nT.c w. b {. I ��yss 100. 10-wb-.-.-sa1-]I►. wwN 9 K 41-t OL.COM N / iW W. �s ��s s.���� '• ••11 • ab.a._®wm WpL (0 00100-.-1-MarTF1 nroN e w _ a 4✓L-1. .- .- 1• CANDLd nil/ Oo 1wN .1111 n[. I E G I T i ■ I • I q+1r�1-w.a,~1 Ili 1 N_M � ��/;:]�_�_ m/�auru � RENTON, WASHINGTON \-PVC MOAT 100 ' � � aw.wllawv saw..sour.s awu*COON^ —— (•? w } ..-.... .,,.a. - } 'A\` �aa011r M..1.6 O1ya s1m.a(...wl<w.f-!®1 �s 1 InmN WR PrOi IN lRfla O/a-1 _.. �—�`�- �Aoo[ na.aL.wl<11.1FLL►fiA _ P.w6 I . 1LI1��[-We./P m.nu.na, a .. - KS x ""'n'".'�/1r-,--14 Ku i na 133 UNITS/ s v, — ,......,.... 4 STORIES • QaR_.� y _� �;T.1e�9 # � air IN WGnAN b FLAG POLE POLE BASE DETAIL >w*•� DLIGHT1NG DETAIJ FIXTURE TYPE 'A1' & 'A SLo{I '' CANDLEWOOD SUITES HOTEL , _ `Z' o � �•, (41 II 1 1 , 53 I i " 1 ra 1 I1 ',� 1 ..1jI „- I VICINITY MAP c°Nil - I • ^V:, , t f ,'' - N Scale 1" = 200';. ., Ai , IN ° 1 s' 2 1 I t1.0-8111111itlig_ W d� 2 6 5 � 3 � o �.. : I p10 9I6 :` WAY n�� ift It II -L 2S o ;. G„ lit r 99 L,6'•• S Of ,a P I - 23 t♦ � r 1GH l7 I 21 ,, a o t �, ; r le il�ld�19 t $ At �1 2: n ss ,1 `" ���. b It 16 15 102 1-1 5 1 sz 33 F 1 J__-____issis6 1.c,J• 1-..."' ' ' ,5 I Is,_., 10 9 A• 32 ` :: �019 r I I LIQIiT° • i _• .29 p.I I , �-..-, !..1...., f3 �� f4,1-51411-11:jjg I L i �� � :c tc2 d - ��f;Ip1411-..' .-Pb I QE r 5 4 3 lU ' 11 ' lLj5 .. - �631.- I II -' d' t r T o E 1 6 4g /.;�::,� �° ��''jj'`34353 L� � r.r• � �Ili1p 9�1 � �.. �c � �' n ',3 /N�' / '3113Z 33 �"' IU - < S , Q �i� Q , ,, o5s�- 1 3=y;301 rI 1 I2I I. � I 1222 2 i iI ! 1 C1 L �.�,L ee ',•` �-,' lirirr 916"I—` `r 561 1141S � d�' .a�O 3 W I �r^t 20 0 16 -._ .,y. 'sl sl S3 Sa I r __ y4 . :". :.... r3°��M x -.+r .r L,,„,,, CCESS 60 I ' f7 CI ♦16 ci • • y.J» J TL.4 rl il! 1 .. • . u t 1• _,.yA-2�.t. Q . [ Is — ., , w ,L0 ° c A 16 s o §. I fin rs� TOr � a:70ic 1 1 I 4e �. J P. 1 N I Q. •T 34 • Q 1 . W [ f] 1`[ es 1 ,i ap 'II lU 2 - vl 1 � L '>S 3 � .. � i► � , '� . ,N',MP^`p^� I I5� nL \\. Ili' re�°:Ib t t �° $ SITE �,T } ,I� _. 3fii. 25 • 30 I W VA NT y-1� 1 1t0 124 2s 1 30 313z i N—�J t---. �n J ~ 11 I CI aY41san1em2021� 24 •s� 0 - — I I,.. 1 TL s� ,�.� to .� ST " I &? ��� ,�.. 1 r6TH - S'W.` _ J,'i 1_'{' x U111 �6t 443% 3r?t • °d 3 ' I\ I 1� r I I I I .4 1 I I I I �',1'�0; I I i i 1 1 i 4 I I I 1 I I I I ' "I_- o f 11 1_I-1-1,f-1 1 1 N,c DAY CARE 17 v —1 • 1 1 i 1 1 ,I I;.i. l-I;1-dl I .I : +- r. . I:''1 I I•Cw i �7yl ql:l!.ICI:I.I.I • :.I�n ;I �I-I'I ;� ~3 -, • I I I'I I I'I'I'I a 1 `:1a ' :1-,-1•I 1 1'I`1- W I I L '4 _LL 11JJ__L Ito OFFICE .a.�_LL4,� b 3 in Q i--73f _ 1:__ __3 ‹:( 4__$ ---k— - a i '----' \\ .___2 Azr__it(110 717 0 ''' _I_'" i_71_ rx.7` °/<---- -—T.—„.— , --a 1 _i_____44414 04. 1 \ 101 _Ib4PP-S- A_t_a 4_ _�T ---- -�? '<-- I ^ PARKING ` ..i.- It". cr. --\ --r-Vito.:- ar,0 13 4 96?,c)_ 1" ' -- `_ _7► ~ :•0_ 11 L OFFICE \co � - - _ i� f - _II =__C INDUSTRrta a--J , (4) - - -iI-„ _ .1 _ . Tf_-31 • u Rq q— " - 'fJ/ FHA:L j ri___14 I a ! P 4 LAW/ KINGDON, INC. Architects • Engineers • Planners / / , POrtilltair.'". :741kilViiiiiki—, IP 7 i:: MN - - . Be . _I - - ® . I.` .rfr MI RI al ! ��. y'$ • - 4G tal u'N ' � �. xF. fir.s . _IAA I .. I .__ l FRONT ELEVATION (SOUTH) !" ) 4\ ¢r CANDLE MED n ad dB . .. b IMAM Ili SIDE ELEVATION (WEST) CANDLEWEs)D S U I T E S LEGAL DESCAIPTIOP* \\i, < DVIrcn BY FIRST MEBICNN TITLEl i !< T Lmi i 6AAnn'-' z.1.(rCI aN 3A E L•N W ..,.__. TO TIC U T GTY D, 8.vIOLU 16 I. .W 1 TN r^^^^^^^---,�,,,,,,J ..... PLATS➢STD 4, PUT THEREOF,KU,RECOILEDCOUNTY,W VOLUME 17 OF N P 74,RECORDS O K.G CONTI. ASNINGTW ICA'�^l ^P +S- TOGETHER YITX VACATED TIONS AVENUE SOUTHWEST(B31t0 AVE,. w,E.III.^."wAV �p�\\\\VVIIF(I JI([JIII�'fJ'tj SDUTIO ADJACENT TIERETOI 1918 _a t H )1 EXCEPT T�AST 40 FEET THENCE,VACATED BY THE CITY OF EXCEPT THAT PORTION ONVEYED TO THE STATE OF WASHING.FOR �� J I RECORDING TIMATMEBEB 36W.S1TLMiaED�1N M CDIMT UNDER KING, PARCEL Sr SUSN N.NOLEM LOTS 7-23.BLOCK 36 INCH,HILLMhr3 DRUM.GARDENS '�,Q w DITTO DC CITY ATTLE DIVISION M6 ACCORDING TD THERECORDSAT(Y E OECOR00 IN VOLUME 1)6 PLATS.PAGE)N, Cn RENTON, WASHINGTON EXCEPTTHAT PRTIDN CONVEYED TO THE STATE DF WASHING.FIR PRIMR1 CC REL RDI`GTNUABEGA 544368,orUATED RO COED MHTYL NINO, 8 w 1-40 E D VA �' OR LESS. O O® PARCELS'REMIND'B'CONTAINING AN AREA O 06,8))SP.FT.2.91 JZ� J 9 Q SUBJECT TO ENCUMBRANCES O RECORD.INCLUDING KING MINTY Y 6 0 - R)E)U216U10 NO.54436B9 AND KING COUNTY RECOOOG N6 FFF--- VICINITY MAP ' —�-�—%b If ,LTmNJ,Ii.'ON.SITUATE IN " �'sRa`aTMa Ili nEAtx awTER �� P` il VERTICAL DATA* I II NA VD 19BB.ELEVATION-24.157 LEGEND /V I 1- BENCHMARK: a p3, PROPOSED ME UrW BASIN �7. ti:.:,, .`` I CM OF RENTON BENCHMARK No.1581 i d ac FOUND 3 1/2•BRASS D. O z € H R N _ '14� i ii SIDE EAST 1END OF(BRIDGES RIDGE LOCA LOCATED RAILJNO O NORTHZ PNpPOSED iWE U �f y �•l �� ` NEW CANDLEWOOD.HOTEL �I: II ST REST a CRT SW 16m sT M oAKSDALE AVE.SW) a Z n OWING TYPE CATCH BASH „-I U Ix � DIVING',PC I CATCH BASH, ❑ (2/ '- // °"�"�`��«^' .: H j1 SITE DATA a n .__. 4 ., sN<e.-- t +.is>w.V..-4.. .Av4.44"'4 Q I`` m TRr.T,+nr. U 6 PlmPosEn s1ORY DRMNMS uxE m R / ,. ,: ). t. U CO I '..44 4e..,',4..0 � 'y'�, I �i Ire.MINA,North es.,.aM�o-r>o obo-w< CO IXSRMi SlMA4 gllRwf[lYE .. l� r Q 4Er II f� • E ••• 1 - - ,:• 3 q Q Y EU PROPOSED WNW sEwu MN.GLe (n STE DDAN9 M .- PROPOSD WWI SBBR DIFMROR • AC `" _.AM - `� — 4:-. IU-I Ne nA321•1 feet BpW� Q IXISTNG WIMPY SOU AVYIIXE .-` A< �J" ._.. 1 "1' Mowa A.w O Ia�e rePt Q O _ iJj(�j1' S IMa/I ' J roa•veaene wet H�o s Ft PROPOSED SWRMn SEBFR UNE ; A.•1 I a v .m m.r yp v H IX mNc swoon SEWN.mE _—_ 1 ^ 1• BIID ANr.Q .mATR �, EATING wA ERMNN { l I 1 1 C 1 116 I I 1 C ( �:• ,v o NNW'. " Y I,i, IX4TN6 FRE NYOP/M I 1 A55 A i a,' E%$nNG CRATER VALVE p ��� Ft ¢n feat xoa,„n M a.ee> I 1 ..I GA...EL�H 6 Ft Ily w PROPOSED wATERMNN � m<, D.eroH 66 F< PRRDSm FIRE H R N l d E I 1 3 1 1 1 € 3 1 I ow.`°rrLL YTS,L D<.e.. 53 m IP yy gg PROPOSED CRATER VALVE ffM���� I ` • __ , w�,,,,Mt B ! B O PROPOSED PO DEVA IONS �—_� Jr' Aar —��— ��� 'amberN emu,Rep.. ea s per w H e Par 3 wqo U Stall.Sze II E%SRNG SPOT ELEVATIONS v - - _ - - - - fapec<sr .M.a 3G.on H6 reef O %c pxi��', IXSTINC CCMWRS __1W__ SW 16th STREET Lectum a Ste o!Icve o.t 6 J ...<Perce Seel e Moe VAG,I A) <er o g e pert% a L D�6 C t,1, PROPOSED courouRs ---T�--- --- -- -- -- -- MAN s Lawa.CeP..Paw,, o$H E. Y Ia SI,.,r._ado,Rt qet Frontage _n gi PROPOSED PAVEMENT Res.Yt.e Lweeayw PAMee o ; ry ..e I've Lt ePeM Req.-. Y .N b� MA P Y Wane .P6,0 S Percent .0 ro ..See, )�° x a PROPOSED CONCRETE INDEX OF SHEETS „" a sa u wre H y4 ,M K.BA( l( I cower sART 4:7*�f`c Otn-1 2 Pf�bNAR1'SITE PLAN RTE. TIC C012PT1MiL SITE PLAN Mir O BASED a A PRELINIWRY Q auevEY PRE.Ana.)TIC OAR rnnANY a JaM,.R.IB,1999. _ 3 PRELMNARY GRADING AND STORM DRANACE PLAN FD,:TS r 0b , 4 PRELIMINARY SANTARY SEWER AND WATERMAN EXTENSION PLAN 3'F'BNA rC b8 1 c.``. 5 CONSTRUCTION NOTES AND DETALS 1 01. I N AND 6 CONSTRUCTION NOTES A DETALS CRY OF RENTON oe.nmwmener CV..u.11C wowBs 7 ROOD STORAGE COMPENSATION EXHINT 8 TREE CUTTING/LAND CLEARINO PLAN COVER SHEET PL1 PRELMNARY LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLAN PL2 LANDSCAPE NOTES AND DETALS emir ws _N. y0z,BN la amp MB_ g .� .a.�•=,o .. c MII Of gala vv .........MINN wwws .............. t min al a 8 U m ......, 1111It 1•01,11.• Marley ME ME to, 222 R• 22 F.PP—SS—T-17T .... -..., ".. 11.20' '2•11E41%111. ? — E., ..... ... qt tIETZT g PREUMINARY SITE PLAN — - I ..:—:. -. .... 1 NO REVISION I ••• BY EWE APPli ••••• 8'S 42,-- ' 1.' ',:r.. CANDLEWOOD HOTEL = . , q 1 1 1 1 I I st i PACIFIC VENUE S.W.(VACATED) \ 1"1 11 EXISTING BULDING t I SO1 i Ii.',I1 x x 11574 297 68" t i \—"— I „,.....i t....i 7: i' I i i ., ...• ; rI,r1 ,..••••11. t.:A......; ...,... li 1 .._ '—"N'.•.'.'.'".---•.„1,-1,.....4-1 '.,, rf „ 1 1 0 . — 1 L,..};1 1 12 GOWN.SKIS•IV.1221.0Y I *.1 1 i i —1-t -.....,..,:.,,,,,,. MI ..."-. ,...'F..: • At 0 o 0 ...i I- ' Vs: 1 ',..1 -,, 12,1 DJ 44:. .1 IZ 1E3 ,,i'l.. 1 • ;..,.,.,,,,, GA.1 .7, • LW 1.. • t., .,,.. . 1 r- i.".."-''...;1 8 a ,"'1-'44.• „. ,.4''661111i1111.37; ''...'2 • I A • 1.4.. K. 1.4.• I 1 1 17- 1 1 7 • %. ... ,:,.Y.t.,., Ve Z 1‘, i I . ' i :. il . . 8. i iv 1E091 .. . > Va I I 8. ,(3 DJ .".4 -..‹ 4.46 I 4 .'"'• Et :,',;5 1 1 ..e".1 , I . 1 > ,,ji ....,, 14.32 12 '1., 11.22V L ' . •, 22.00' 20.00' 24.02/ i I.11': 1.-- 'r.-1 20,012. 20 CP 4. nos =1,x.. 4.1 1 4 F 9; 1 rn-11- , 1 0 1 9- 115::, ,, „,. r1r.1 1 1 1 .1 Nei, C. g ck• 111,11 I ril ill c,- Ir 1N1 gr . g I 1 ° 40 II III11 .11911 1 z FALLS••-4344W .-. tia.....0,4,414,,,?'"Z. io 14,, +- I .itresmal; r'.‹A § -=.1' 4 CI :" 44p41,4,144, .3',K:1".,24:4°..1 ..."i L 3) '- • ' 14. 10:: 6 •"2 :'-.1 Yl.'14.02 g: .P...1;V:i'''''.‘fr'Ye.r.r2.2://1•44:!,*,,•1':14AN2R., 4:4.41 4. Vi.: R'...L:;1;•. i; ' • ' :;rf,65,. g I 21 I II 212.00' Warg4/ _ •i& AP ' __ -- ..-,.. .. s•Tor :'1'' ' ':' ..41AMAREEDithei i.a:t•-•!tfr"....r:V'4...''''4..1.1i'Yi;l'....:i.,.1%,`;re.„s i 6 Ay.'d'::,,,,e, .. I §t, Vs L__ —A , — . 4, $. --f-- ____I II i § -I 1 ,1, °§ THOMAS AVENUE S.W.(VACATED) F i Ng 11! , , 1 ra Fl i 1111 il g I. ;! A I1 . 1 If ...3H140.. 2 . .3, 113215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH TITLE LOCATION ITT. / el Aa.,„, .z KENT,WA 98032 I CANDLEWOOD HOTEL COMPANY 900 BLOCK OF SW.16TH 8[FILE I .,4.• ,Mk_ _ (425)251-6222 63 8080 EAST CENTRAL RENTON.WASHINGTON q WICHITA,KANSAS 67201 co i qt eqr CM112 ENGINEERING.WU PLANNING, NO 0..0- SURVEYING,ENVIRONIVENIAL SERVICES BCE JOB NO. 6882 PRELIMINARY GRADING AND STORM DRAINAGE PLAN i F pH —__...._ ____- - -_,...-.:::::::::.:,,_-.._..,_-_______-15-,..... .7:741,..- N .ao --._._ __jy-..____-._ - - -- __.. .. _ - _ Z 2 ,\ ' '� ', •%' _�-- oar >Ix. �,' ��� a e '.eit T---7-• —4w x/• r. ,`, ::x ,Qv,mcuuvR a, y8�+ nw.�ecLoexe l-_` lI I a'��pp��� �' '� .,L'�•r1WX �'S_ � :- - kti .._.- 109 IF, O ..,,,,..., ,,,, ,,,,,,,,,.- -:,,, , ,...„ .... . .,,..,,,, A%_ r?.. ig g U ''c.0ua, I.-.fpw J+,a iaoat r•••• ,�..» ` :.. ,; 1 ,.�:vi ". T,�a':m"°. dS�`.a:'"�:3E' IT I.� t \��+xa rl Ern ``i\ + :`• ,y 1 e�r� —simil izii.e s'S .'g I! `TM j a LI 1 ' i 1 •••�/,�_._i .� 'r; 31 f11W lEA0e1 ",3) II MM -•i Z'>'f�,�w E .S s l �•w 1'�� 5, ' ��OIIYOl MOID {�i F ! -t �2 - 1 t frtr+o�i'r SWs) ,,:,......1,..--�' �' i,aro _, A z i /•••.` .t • y 1 ,I k PAN MOM FF2t2 ; ,.(c s1)Cc '��h ' per'' la vs F / J 1 / t.. i / �,s.•x 1 4 1 l iam :a. ki m I 1 1 J// i/ •-t'"s% m o /I W .:ax' t, i - • ,` I'r W Z ,,,v ,.x ':a or I^h YOBS+` I •n r I 00 iE. S 9 is 1 L, ..cmW+�uiYCst !! �1:s.:, n`r� J 1 f&&P6Y 5 + ® 54� r� ire y' c.x ,y ' W .pu ' MIN CA111R (, ..J I R iiRf -"'.r/ �'i / a 't " .t'ji ..adp I . I O urg Y aE •', yy.. ��Y+ 4 't'� +s• �f `.GIB y • �t .a to 1 .'" a f�f 1'4 1t h �jjt, • .. }n, , ! x I \`ice ua t•,:)� oo 4J�il a �171 �F Q �• :t1:f.� I ..... ..iirlifill•N: Y ',r' u6' NIWAB•IMLT Mv- rIV•<MX Y 1� +Nf /1A� 1 U ' rafts ° 6 ��-- N. _ rwwLEAom �{'��;�. �e�ttMrtad i p w a �. ,A•,. 1 g r 11 1 Lii : r I ' W :,a t• tr« n,, 11 i 2 I t 114 OR -is :I >b> , ( .. r r ( �- 111.1/ �.1„,./, ,a ,azs U �i1 a— RI a94� r Ya �� o• , L ,„ , :� �: ,, t. •"n >�>rn-' a :,;..cam aDxcra scrlux° t • oEr°Yx xm..�> •+{.w f•)) Sr, i'F'. ITEN t,k"'R SN[hl � a. b� ,I."-- Ei amp r s - 1_ / •yPly.�l • .. —_.... d �! 8ON • ak1 3MS / .f }'st8 ��� , 1 ,i/ "fit ,2,.... .`` ....tg�a[II ,..u, 16.�sx 1, r m'", '�,- _-- ,_ IV , G e i a• f ")-T li al. �{ - z ) ♦♦ ++ -evF + Y+AT9t •'tAM Neyy1 I w.. El�flla{ATO! /::r1 N 4 s. • - ,'.�G•r - Zz3 r - ., 1.s ,411 s.L,yl M \:A *mx c -ism Cr o$ o a IIIF:1FITZ "< I;'''', �.. " --- - i?:..._ ; � I�„*„.4 ax ..\ TOUR.rm,_.,•+s cr r s.4 r gat +a,D•, • 1 l • _• :4. •� 1 .r,.z °*15�- � I E -\ MAXa Mt.ro E onuwEo n L<Y • '- �' •I ,,, T I r- - i. I , . _ �y to I \ �. • EY,m�•xiT L~ ,\�. I�'C LOT UWE Eons .•� .T'Eini . f Em'.. r,, h - T x f1.1t V' VN �Y'•,. — IHidt.a b .. ,,,.'ge ._..., 'c a [z. '.7^'._ \t i fi• �JA •r _ - Q RI — — C -+aee FlL Olm IX.STREET WR G :(Y••E•7 IX STREET lYM C11 • E-AY N- ' 1�' EL mem mtrr I -� e'c 7 1 � ow ..,,...,,. CRY OF RENTON ?--- - - - - - , - -- ��AIrR4,llr or•4•Ruc wOroR "d."d�uc .,Y _ .rYE ..,� u.�s,rxE•--:r -"'II r-. IMINARY ---` ----s' IX CAW } •mn PEEL GRADING AND O •�-.enr,.-. f�ty:.x- -t_+e-___•_ __•__ i ,t,,..t.) •:^Ta.`:-e. ,;.,:.'•?;i!�`SW ': i,'-Sx .!;{'•;•y:- _ ^-p�''�`�„tvti -,,�-__ Y1 ii.a STORM DRAINAGE PLAN___. Z yr-' ;6..-i.... ' . e.l i :�'. 3'i'"r:a!�ln'..�;i:'`i;,;%,,t':•rr` c,:., .'a.. •.•^.y =',-"�7•--:.y1:1,'4 t'i" --',1. �1::5. '% •+,.�'` ate— cos 2/Wm masa •ZITS _ m ._1 'i PRELIMINARY SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN EXTENSION P!Ar n� N al 3 a .— x w%rrwvie111171.7.$!.,"$..1.. - r X Li �__.-K_" Pr a 8 Sit nY i 0 ___________1( ,_._, wre9a,w E.���+r I ,n I. � CO� /,: �. ! -'^�._. , _ III J((.- z /^ i 1 � a ►� ' DC "OIlflll -r i►EtJE®MCli 8 x1 \ / t K .'DC•EMIC BEIMCE •. 11 �w %; NEW BUILDING " z \ /aF '�,� Y `. FF-212 . � li III f e c7 r E n a x, II Z / xt ?'8 _`- - - IS wµoE i EATIBIENT U II 1!:1 TC j % k. ) 1 -— 1 1 , [. ‘i ....,:, aL----...xT r,T I _ 6 y / _, x, . ss I N ii 1 I I I�I __ Ei d I j d.met :2.; Z. m al • L x, ( ) 11 • I , 1 1 ' { ;_...Y: __...^` I � I ry am'H,�+ jj m e< fl E r rr 2 1 i I i E .:::It '1' I 0•4 .''' .rt.9(H•EA \ - - S �•...-awe. �8�... ' = p10►WNCG7b11 EIOBfNO(.NN � 6..t��yf�` Qy K.t r rnmEll 9e-90 DC31,6.T LOW IX 911EEf lIC•1f ..� .-•.Y{(2N'•Vj d� d.S,IR:ET Io I MKS1CV a-,.23(9-'I A wI aw_ CITY of RENTON PRELJMINARY SANITARY SEWER O -` �-"-_��---c ��• - ,.,.--•---"r' -. ><:;h• � ,T-'.��^ .. �v ,ram_-•-- APD WATERMAIN EXTENSION PLAN 2 r 9s .; i i6'a'y;: +>: :':vrctic� i�d;l:_ `%'^.'�F ��,kr- riy..v._ ...,.o-� '.: .•.., r Y.w-. a l t .' r,. _ of d•i a...:i=..�_..r' 1 ..f '•'( �1. r._.:`3'A•e-�.�h'.ti ■;::, e•� 9a q .... •..m +... , W /MN • w r •99•• I.., 4 .. 8 m CONSTRUCTION NOTES AND DETAILS 4, I 1 F 1 STORMWATER DRANAC7E NOTES SANTARY SEWER NOTES (n BEFORE ARY CONSIINCTI.OR aWLO1ENT ACTIVITY OCOAS.A PBECONSIUCTI. AL TaR r LL BE Ix COEDRYAwE AM,AM[•ArD N I. YEETIK MT E.0 PIN M CIT1 Or REM.EPARIENT CF PIWIC RAPS ALT-IFI"i 10611 s" --- /*'"';''':T a 'AA M UTET MT. (L 1 (!] DESIGN FNCIEE4 + /Nw S1AxwA05 AM)94CIi1ilOR 1/3' COMM:TFD DEPTH a- ....- 2 T.HOURS E EGA IN TIE ST.7 RIGHT.�Y SHALL E LINE.TO nJO A4 r0 GLUONS Ix PWLiIC CONCRETE 'a ND J .yya 2 ALL CO6rMTI.s.a d Q .NOW PIPE AK YUCIFAL I. CPSTAUCCTIU^BARED BY NOW OA ..SOAR IMESS OTERWISE APPOSED IN WITCK rt M UEPNTE. CEMENT fl0M(CM) _ SW.EEK LOCKING d 50 co 0 AIO M A.ICN PERIL IMP SSOCIATIO6(MA). wale ay M CIrS a a ROTC IMO AT 22-2620. STREET CLOSURES.PARTIAL w FULL SHALL OE T - L�1 Rmfw EvnRnfNr a PUS.YEYS APPROVED DEP n VIZ 21.1111017 CEPARTIFIT OF 1 SANLL C Md.£M 1FIFD 2•AP IN ADP. r� ~ o J STEEL u3O00/STF GALVANIZED CO CO J. M STOP ORAINITO SYSTEM TIE E COKIRLCTED ACCORDING M M APPROVED 1 ALL CO STIICTI.S.E IN ACCOOMa TOTH'SruWM SPECIFICATION FOR 'W R' L' /SIFTS SEE NCRs DWG..PIP PM GN FILE IN M®ORIENT a POLIO WON¢ avl ATlw FROM • • u^ �'s M KPINI.PARS WILL WWI.TRITON NYROSAL FRCP M CITE RENT. WM[CIPK RAit IOIr6 COKAYtT L PREPARED BY rATMKi.STATE 11 OW. a Dj 1Y, DEPARTMENT K 011LI[41q LESION DLIE➢1.SiOIY RATER UTILITY. PAMPA P.M IMP AAOCIATIOA LATEST EDITION(ON)4D CITY a.TCA RW=16S (n MONO SPECIFICATION °° oql ° ( �� 3 ._ 6 ^ l 'SMII M1AOR➢PLANS WSi E p M A9 91h.NEVER CO6LIMr1. •, ALL LOCATION E EXISTING UTILITIES SHOW ME APMOXIWTE AND IT SKML I M / •a L8•I CONTR..s HcvOKteam TO VERIFY M THE MM CORE,LOCATION w A!TO / °p ,./ / /././ o./ f S. DITTO SHALL BE U.S.L S OEEE GAME NPRMD FP CI,O RENT.COWIEM AVOID PRAISE OR OIS1UINWt. 111� 1� o a PUE'C PPS IIfrFIExa SEICYNn PT ELEVATION ARE TOTED p M 0.M6. S. A 1RECOA61EKTip COEERPCE MO A NaOUR TOTIE ON1 E ECUIIED PRIOR To R l'�1��� IL O 2 $1 n ENTAT1.hROS(w FACILITIES.T E IN OPERATION PRIOR To CLEARING MO STARTING IE1 CO6iRCTiOI IT lWi1 E M CwiRAciw's IESDO6Ieu ITT r0 NDTE 6 ALL Cp6raC110(NO TEN WST E SATISFACTORILY PINTA.°WM OLD E WC..POINTS PRIOR i0 STARTING g6TRC INS (IR9PRI.nLl i0 sal fxE RS RECOMM M Oxs iRCiION IS COYPFlFO up M M1pilAL FDR.SITE FMSI.w5 PASSED. E N.TOW StD FP A RELITY TO NIVEOTI E M CITY O EPNROV I}SUNS IS M srt[PREPAMTOx a KTFwn PnKYOrt S.C. EL F COIr4NT.f EFO6IeILIT n NOTIFY M UTILITY CEP 34 HIauR!IN 1. ALL RlmrlGN TION FACILITIES NW BE TOTALLED Alp IN OPERATION PRIOR TO OR AYNC(O...Fat...Fat.ML COSTILDTIEN G Y IN CO.NCTION POII ML CONST.11w Acnnrr IRLES5 OMRRISE APPRO.,BY 4 CONTRACTOR IS SEER R.v.s1EE FOR M PANS WOWS AHo sEaocEs a LIGHT ASPHALT PAVEMENT SECTION �• e _ () M DEPMi1ENf a RRIC PPS STOW MTFR UTILITY. CONSTRUCTION AW FOR TIE SAFETY a NOM A%D.R5.M COSTI CTION GRASS SEED GAT E APSIED rt.101.1. M GRASS NIXT,.OMIT 1H% SITE , �Q)CIT O PEMON NPROVFD SLA%AM YIES BULL E SUMMED rt n MO.. 3. II PALL E M RESP.IBILITY O M CYRRKTOR TD OBTAIN STREET USE MO AM x ARUTILM OCT ND MPIOYFD BY T.OEPARTEIIi a PAT[TORH6.STOW w1ER 01.MATED PEWITS PRIOR TO AM CONSTRUCT. U 9. ALL PIPE NO AMR..(S 91.EUID w A PROPERLY REPABE FOOOATION IN R. N..MIK.BY M CITY a ENTON PL.IC MM3 DEPARTENT SULL THE I MIME.O.ALL OTTER RJUN T.0'ION.PITS SECTION 7.3(1) M 0.00 5 a TOPINGr.STAMMSPECIFICAT C'(MXI)LDW.W m DEPTH ION FOR ROAR NO MIME CO STRCTIw PI 9W1 IWPM ECEIINO A tart a TIfY APPROVED PLAN EhT E.M A9 SIZE WHpESER CO61A.Cilw b•ASPaa.nc WKRrrr YN. NG O M Mx.MTV..M TOP a M FOPTATION INTERIM.AS YELL IS PROOFS D u PLAaYOD AO CO►KTI.M PEPTISED EmiK VA.1AL TO PIE.GP. CO.,mamma B.(R9) SO NADT TIE PT.LIDIGN a T.PIPE RILL E SAPORIEP.A wi MOOT WNW O. mxrWcr.9ULL PMPIa M CITT a BEAU WITH N AS.IILr DRAOK a II LNG ALL A PIPE.BEC PA.BE E MIA CLASS'S•POT T.NTFOREXCEPTION OE 1 .11 SWITMP SEER SS1EY.IGN TES EEN STAMPED MD SIDED n A LIalABEO I - 11 �,P FIVE .ALL iRENW wOO1LL SUER BE CONTACTED r0 YIMIEM n PERM FOR PROFESSION.1.1.11.LICENSED RORSSIOUL SAVE. InI FP o PRICE MO S1MCrOOL FILL MOM PERCENT OPEANS:RF ASTY D-Issl-. P. iii �1 cuvEL EMI.SHALL E Y IKEs AK.w.w0 SABER PVC PIPE 11 waauL swu E RA.EpwLY.WTI slas a M PIP IN uYEn nrx A LOOSE p P7i •E 10. GALr.W 13ED STfa PIPE A%ALLSn1EED Srm PIPE TOR ALL DRAIWa FACILITIES PALL AYER.EM a e IKES..111.DEAN E e DOES.POMMY TABLING E. . / O C) E HAW A9RALT TE.AIIENT It OR BETTER INSIDE A OUTSIDE. URA TO IN PmCEM M wI1EM DIMITY. TIESE CONTACTED USERS 116T WOO = EI£'.=12.93 FDR O[PIPE DIMErzR p EACH SIDE E M PIPE DR n M SIDE E M nEM1 .. :.• ...:::a II. STRUCTURES PULL MN E PONITIEO P.M 10 FEET O M sMIK ERE OF AM STORY Z z S_ WTAIALS M CWPIETE M FILL OYP PIP SWLL E M 5.11E AS OESDRI®. V�H V V V V�� R'DA CL£AgIIT , Li DRAIMAa PIP..15 FEET FROM M M O Ni OMMWL w11(. p FOR. Ii 12. OREN PT ROAD CROSSINGS FOR UTILITY TIE3OES.EkISi1K TRAVELED RONDEY / lip- P a I w u' 12 ALL P.NON ORATES$1WL BE OE O.10 FEET.01 PARPEM LEVF1. PA1 E P.N.NIP CRIB.RCP A%EOUNICALLY CONTACTED. CUR INTO 3 N U a M COSTING ASPHALT PULL E EARIE M WINS SO IN A ONTIEp1A LIE. n c TEMWrt NIX PATEN MAT E PLONKED 1YEDIATELT Ar1EI1 0MNFILL NO U Il OPEN CN RMU POSSINGS AK EXISTING PRLIC RIOT4-WAY TILL%i E ALLOT. N (p pp MISS FECIFICALLT AwR.ID FP CITY O ROrt.DEPONENT Or R6LIC TOGS COACT. A PIY9EM%T VI PAT.SYLL BE PLONKED TI1HIx 10 Mrs. E DCSION 011.A P.E PER CITY O MPS CUEEM STMDIRS3. �6G i0 SOIL DONEE.ECOEAFNO,AiIONs J co SSE POEPNATION A ALTO..PASOENT S.O.5 I(_j•J .P4 In. MP FOR EIIOSiw NOTECIi.M R.DSIOL DITCES Eoa EMIR..SHALL E O 13. PIP PUIl IF CITY E HORw U.SC AID C S. saWO EMRTv RCP PACED TO A DEPTH a 1 FOOT ND LINT WET T.Put.. HEAVY ASPHALT PAVEMENT SECTION „ •"71 & SPECIFICATION: I Ts O a 1.../40 PERMIT TO ro RRCEM PASSING,)3 WOES t• ML On1OEO MEAN SYLL E EEan AO EApEP.OTEmisE s1wILIIID 10 M • EU To INCHES M.%JO 1 .4 PASSIM,MO-E OWES Ma/10 PERMIT SAIISARI.E rE aPM1EM1 F.M FEE19AI.M.dI1E EROSION MTG M xa .wE ORIFICE R_2 I/H e• Q to PERCENT PARING. COOETi.E MMDOCTIOI EL.=11.0 coo ]� ! AL WILDING OOE®WR Ara FOOTING PRIM PALL E COMECTIO TO TIE STORY In PE Arp ARUR[IL1IC6 53IA11 BE 1A10 M A PROPERLY PRUNED fBAel.rt.IN W Q DRAINAGE SrsIEY.EII APPMYED ON M COW..a PEIC MRI;DESIGN ILL WITH SECTION 1-02.yyI1 a T.CWEIIi STATE O IN.INCT.SPASMS r r AM (,J 3 fKixfq.51OEwiP UiILIiY N M%UATFLI OIBEMIOED QA11FIm AT-0UILi SPECIFICATIONS FOR NW MD IS.Cd61MCTION. IS STALL 110.ECEEARY FLOW RESTRICTOR CB s I/I,a,a DRAIN%a MIS DRAlwa SmFll nu E S INIrTED i0 TIE CITY a REMw LP. �1ELING a M rYFMp MTi..M FOP a M FOMAIIp wrfl11K As E11 • Y t' ,or To sw[ (� ]]]9��� COPLETID4 m TRwM1�Tm.OMPICCTTN Yr 11f REWIRED PE SILL GW ERRTTD.TOA WIE GOO EIH 15. ISSIM¢a M WILDING CO CONSTRUCTION POINT BY T.CITY O RCN.DOES%T UM..SASE PIPE EW LNG SMLL E PA ORnYF1 I OWE:NON NO ffL.TIE Z RELIEVE TIE ORE11 O M C.NiWI%LEGAL OBLIGATI.NONE LMILITY CO ECTED OBE Q n sraw SON.INTER DISPOSITION. DATIaL rE clTr a RE.w DOES Ml a'-. ACCEPT ANY.100.1 FOR M PRIM FCACTI.IK MD SAINTE..O TIE n. MIT.ENP PIPE.ALL BE PDLTVIML OLP.(PR)MA.GAPEim STSTEY PRICED QURIK COSTRC1i. Nn D SON.SDR D.OROUCr TIE IRON OAR!0. U 1l il. M CpfRACtOR SHALL ff RESP061WE TOR PROVIDING ADEOUiE SAECWO,SMEiY It. IN p1YPOYED MEAS YMIRE TO Ea.YINIMM a WOES Am ANIMUS 11 DEV'ICFS.PMTCRI.E.IPIENT.RUMENS.NO MA OTTER.0ED ACTIONS TO I HOES.HELVE FIx19ED ONE. vm AREA LOVED IUSL SLOPE IN All 1 PROTECT ON LIFT,EE M A NARY U M RO ID AM r0 PROTECT MIN .1.1 6 10 INTO S.G Ili LOMECiI.nix M PDEBWAAa a s COrEBED BY M CONTRACT MAXIN \ASPHALT .� OINP 1E TRAVELED RIp16a.1 NC NAT INIUPoAT.11.TRAFFIC FLOW PALL P/xx••ESD•AMIDN WTERML - EMIRS AN APPRO.111.VriC CM.PLAN rt M 1RAiF1[OOIEgING DIVISION aLil M OCPNTE.OF P LIC TOMS SECTIONS OF M r9OT ST.. 1/rR AT Jo»L1s EXTRUDED CONCRETE CURB DETAL SPECIFICATIONS I-07.LS natrrI0II)) COMTRDL.9ULL WRY. -��r• II SPCIA OwIWE EASUES FRCP BE BEQUI RED IF M PROJECT LCCATiw IS I/THIN M pp TO � 1p AQUIPR PMINACE ARA 1/x'N••EPPS. ii !! SO.MP 10 E WOOL cc.CLII A.cunER T A II STORM DRAINAGE PIPE SPECIRCATiONS TO CUE AND GUTTER Cap STONY G GAT GAIN PIPE BE.S1R;110 E OE a DE w LN.ENLOT1EI1A5 ESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED IN OE ALP ALI PIPE JOINTS M15T E GASNCIED INIERTIG.NO • I 9 m O .1 E M M SERE INTMI 1E PIPE PIPE SWLL GAVE A YIx1Y.Y CDYER N o$ry m SPECIE.NO NULL E PDE.ARII PIp1ECTED OAP.CO SNUCTI.(SEER TO M • u LYE IACTS S RECOUP/PIMPS 6 P RINI.COVER FOR WAVY EQUINE. i/ ATIxJO w1ERM1 SCORE LAWS GENERA.NOTES A QUCTIIE IRON-A Da.0 1.1RCn DIAYEIIP PIE PULL BE CYST 52 AK 16-I. B - B JOI.S.aRAMV PATS 5W11 BE PUCED NOT TO EXCEED 15'C/C N.LESS PP IO'C/aCA.1MEN PULL ry 3 H,fiP 6 b FADER.24-I W OwETM PIN:P.IN S 5.50 H- .£M.v0E TINS RSA I 1 E J 4 THAN 35w11•E PULED AIL GOD 09013 IS WELTED B n't34tm1 wN0 51141N W $THONG A-tt.1(ARP C-!1 JOINTS IANL E M.-0II.ECWx'ICA.. R!ry N F PN®(YIMp YINIYN ). Y-wOM O<9OEWAN I'BELOR COMPETE n COMPETE-.I.TAP.le INCH DIAYCIP PIPE PALL E Mp.45IW5Ra0.ELL NO - PI/ THE SOM.1 TO E RA[ED VCARxn THE CURB ONO GUTTER.THE JONT THM1 E A COLD.OPT. a y a•t TTIO% RIM al DI GASES MATS.COEOWING TO 0 pA(CAPS II). II INCH tltS MSp•H w10000 5 A 11 OP pL COO*1 MRo 00 04*aTMf1s RICE CONCUR. CR[T£�490 FOP 3 _` GMMI.3e INNS 0 00DR PIPE.A1 E EI FOORCm,BFll AM).IMT WITH RIIMER HALL cOEORM TO THE EORHRENExTS OP cvSS a(J/•�nTH M DARNMYwT. K.BA <'iN I pA,. GASKET AIMS IA.TO ASTY C-n(2 FOOT YfxITY COMP). A IMP TrwIM 1D I.DIAETER PIPE.11,2•-1.TO A-I WI E CORER PULL _PI, THE mNCNflE PALL HAVE A BOOM n0SH 1MH ALL COPS IN.MD A 3W TOOLED PINRN. r p r WA1P41 y es A C BEGIN AaRONa RIM OTV DAP SR 21. 4-1..OUGH 1e 1.DIMETER PIPE. - V IO A00 030N SON A PALL INNS 36-1.YINIWI CO. IMS SHALL BE WI..C01001ON SFLAU.BE 90R(MOWED PROCTO) ((??�� **Ti PRYH-0ON PO RTC CASKETS. PVC STORY PIPE REQUIRES A C COLLARS(I.E Grp + Q _i BASIN COIECTIOQ P...AL COgETE MOTS 1/•'/IT.EDrE T/A'/FT.SLOPE yY' SSL E•- D.KLOCAL CORILwRD RAIN ALWI.IR VIP(tl►R-I I....Ai lY Ixw DINETER VON y��.41s'ENPNJPOR TATERv1. t/2F 1/29 1 I N 0 c IPE.A1 E Ie D1LCE rTTx z 2/3 ZIT I 1 INNS COWRCATI06. 21 I.ORG. CUIa NEILINN ONLY PAVE..A5 PER PUNS JdI11l C�'+AL Vb8 i 3e IW OINEILA PIPE 9N1 E 14 VOW III 2 1/�33 I.11/2 NMI CORRIPTIOa cOURO.. REFER TO DETAILS IN TIE4 PING FOR Art PIPES LAVER MAR 36 IW 01NETE4 • 1 •- H ALUMINIZED PIPE PULL AWE AVANT TEANOR 1 LOVING(2.0-FOOT INT. PANE.AS PER PNJS /L011 I . N PP.. ILA CP.CONC. E. LILIL COEUDITEO STEEL PIPE t(novf)-I I T1EOL.cFH A IMP SHALL BE CI GAUGE STA..CEYW�ICONC. . CRY OF RENTON B INS 3 in I.R I/2 I.MIIR!10 SM.w1EAIAL5 PULP E GALVANIZED TYPICAL SIDEWALK OCTAL NO URGER TO1 A1TMT IN 01040105((1 o-TTOOODETAILS IIINmIM3Fu)PLANS F.A.PIPS SECTION B-B n TJMrA.w'rw�frr or NUM-.wol7cs SECTION A-A PF. IPE TED PWIETIEI IF TING DE 11A1 PIPIDINE a POND Y�9•OR,DE I IlIY.Y SEE SHEET 25.1 E.ROA0RAY DESE100000T STANDARDS Ar cm PTED or M0050 M CONSTRUCTION NOTES AND DETALS O P DiNERR 9MLL BE e YNS PIP OINETFII 91A11 BE A D111ERP FOR M w E SYHIDR IAAS(.AIM CCOOEEORIIIN LO NW 0 32t2, KYFII 13 LEER AIMS Nt E OASIr1ED N wrM1IOT RRTI.i AIMS PULL I WE n1%A"I �_ .TINS A`LL i19n MO SAME MPOIN TO ASHY D Rii((1p I PSy1 U31%ElASiOQIc *imp- RL•°••00 PP•^I - ' --- GASEn CPiWIIK ID Asn F•TT. CA9ETF0 AINn fOL ff LlicAli AS EM. 1R DAP 3/19 �PD ww 3/12M ____ n M 5 100T OILING INSTALLATION •S4*1 1Y AIMS STILL MA E KNITTED. r �A ff MW vp O.T.___ INS+P . PAZ U 1TTINGS 9MLL E W.SOU .DOTATI.L WW1 OR FACTORY RILED. 1MOWORLNi 1C tt JJmoo g PIP FITTI%S SI.WET M.11110 111 SET FP.IN PAS TO V Pt DATE REVISION BY lAPPted DWG. NAME',FR-02 SP PAGE.F007 WPrs D3E--IAR+nE N SHOWN .,P,Fa..04.0„F,..RP.N.40_41 PIN r...T.._.,,,,,nee no-, FOR.. 'INS.,-PO 8 m E �'1 1. - CONSTRUC T iON NOTES AND DETAILS �'�'G1' r e k's2e6c. wK .1....; •-.OLLNIXr SP., JI.I FACE �.i•i.i wPXarn IlL,cn FABRIC off 3 e •. .; wwm°i"a°na non°As y : «' 3a B �1 (7Q�� •�,�i! Z V �'•• 12 NIN. iog 'f. o BRACE POSTS ��.,. rPewaurto cww PR.axro °'G'1P yApm¢ '� ' (Y) ..., slaw SSIF11 GR,s OPR1fD 9v COXMfA LOST JC LL1 Q \'\U- ' 1„1s_�_'T�T,�T}/ a VOTED cw.0 VJ w \�C .BK,`/\ w.r awu w10.x z'moo r.t: 'I:}• .eac awo :�'�'• rav B.A., Z QED R U /'. F.. SOIL m cGI/2TED :I'I? Q iX \�/\" II': • vent COATED STRETCHER WA CNM1 U.FABRIC 1NE LONG HENGM OF THE HOCKS SLRL 1011.MO ME ENITH TO ROY.N1WAT II i ly SE.H11Y.THE ROCK SWLL E RACED m AS M LOCK MO r.G ROCKS IN SC IER. SLOPE TOP OF romrc::II 1• U 1 BAN ROCKS 150 LBS.NBA. BAG Las.wK sa Ir M ITS LEAST G.rlmx II : ' • m uwN CM) LAN ROMS S(O LBS.M. BOO LBS.WE ]2E 1r TO 1r 'III J wM ROCKS BOO LOS.YM. 15IM LBS.wK. SCE Tr TO 2. I.i Nw ROOKS 1500 LBS.W. 2.LBS.I. Sff 2.TO 2Y II" 1E1151ON MIRE i saw moa 2140 IBS.MN SOCG LBS.I . SIZE Sr TO X k '�iv* 1100602 BED MIN Sm CNNCALIN NT.courn0Y.BE DES..MO INSPELIED 112 THE POKER MUST TIE ` i�\`,• •\<` •�'\`:�\' \:`' \'` JNRISCKOON THAT THE ROCKERY eRS INSTALLED M ACCORONrE MN R.N.MO SPEa1Rp1XN6 1111SRD IND b I ROTA.*FELT ANO LONER SHAH BE CONSTRUCTED Of 1 INN la 2 BAN ROC.ACV BAWD STAGE- r DEEP'BASHED Ilm. OK`., I�I I I mac BASE(1n.) I I [Sy'ZROCKERIES I LEE'On 0EEE*S.U'&BE C NS1RNC1E2 OF 5 WN TO 2 WM RICKS FROM `+ `J •ML RILCPIc MATERIALS Wsr BE NM'L COATED. O p SEE BG^ON' TOP. ..... CC .F0011.i �) ::0.: . .... T M SHALL BE m EI OSE➢NET.s,1MES. Q Z Y ROCK WALL VINYL COATED CHAN LNC FENCE d w MOT TO SHIE b UI� a€ Ugn Q to i.ABI 3 i U of i — IJwL Il1i;li I ii l Pj 4N d ia ,--;zr,..i,-,,, 2d s x�� a� i4K.8.44... eN L aIRAa t: Ru '' Jg ��• e a 3 "! I •; p.BL CNR b8 .. I O.IR6 I es,CRY OF RENTON B Ek•APRWMNST or P•USL1c WORKS Eecol.eo® CONSTRUCTION NOTES AND DETAILS Z BAR APPROVAL _ 1 4 my ON. 2soNN _ L W BY In R e W .... 4 m M.m ,� 6 W 6 V [1 R.E..P.,I1RIONglN.N..,.N...,-f„ran L.A.M., re)PT V.... �... m --- -- - - ,-- •• II •" A • Y 1 A . 1 • • • I- ..— I- 2 IT hi ___ _--- °' ."7-:- .4:---::::7-t.::;:::::::-.E•:-.:.:::i7.77.1---.7-+--3',' vi - ..:-..:::::.":27...... V) M -'". ----...-- , s'' 7".--.. s'.'':'I 1 I --'--'-----S-Igg-°. '11'4"-- '''''''-''---- iiKvailL"ablaiiktitAlAtdil--611131516.‘b,''- . -' .-1 1 ro.... ,,..--,,..---,-._---=,- ..-.._ -... s . ----- .,,,,,..,.... ,6.-.L22 . :.... .,. ... _ ...-.. leA, lrjottlikek‘maguimialwiftwitt.. - :__.. .4,..... ...% F 9 •,.. i • . 11 1.2 y / .: .._ I Ij 26.., ELRIARQBROAS ,,.,..2 0 ' '7' I ,. or, • /4\\SA 1 6 •11140 I i 11 Y 8 • ,33.31 •1I•1V'' 1./ „,.., _ I ,,j„, / / '•'•(*6 ••• *••t I. i .00 ‘..... .4/ .,• • ., . - m < § 1 . „,„,,_ .......,........... II • . .. ., , ; 1M* '• ''' & / • I Fk°abfTefte°14.Ki/.//2••'-'-} 1 31,11W 1&1.11. ', % • 24 • •I,43 'IN. 1-• I l• 0 I I i ; i. i•••W( : 1....,?,,,I I _Lama/ pr4001.01 .'.`./.,1,,'1. 1 j/kspNikx4416111111411 , tt AkIN‘ BUILDING 1 / 2 I . . •.,2.6, I , (5 z . , i / • ,..\ \ 21, i ; I I/• •*4047' \Or 4 \,.. % TF-212 t.-..r2.442-52._,_. la.11 1 / 1.4\ •,2.22 5 1 i 11 I 1 __I ..../4.26: •.6•6 3 1-, 1\ I. i I ap•A11011411110, 7:1;_,./ . , .. 1 % \ - _ 1 Al 5 4..z •1 , 131XI TT, . t ISO:1,1,,1,I1011.Up&, •-'!''' 'i 1 l'.;,..,0,3,„' .,.5 - :-.1‘/,/ , - \RI\ NIEllailL.N211\.\\11.\11,‘ .23.4C ••••'''• 11 2 t 1 I Z r.,°] . k, Iv'Tt''°"7-"T "'F2gi''' .519to..,..-. 14 7T/545B.74.• .MAR 1 .1 c 1 f g I • ..,0.4- •••\•••-•.. lib, ..._._._ ,„. . , s-\ --1 ';',', '% • : -A‘ 1 ... !..4 1 111•04 R 1' i A P • t W• • 13.V2 \ •12':1''''' 11 I W tl (1) , •ri),;AO•• ••Ott 1,1;•47 1444 • 1 ; SC ......._.--• i 1 i Z 1 1 Acc 4 li gr '-. A.;•12,r,.;:,„„--,•.y.•••••.t •,,. . ,, , ,.„ • . 0 _ 4 a / • .. , ! .1 .....•' , • 10 x i '.! i : . ,' ' 6 DWOMPEYEARNSAFLTION°°DPLAjSUMMANRY: 2 Q 'I 0 1 . . .11•. - ••P°1° 21 el 1 ••,),1 . &•, .• .1... i . . 4.1 1._!,...7:,,,,v. ill • ._ •WES • • •TOOL VOLUME PRIOR 10 ort-ao.37,DR 0 Z < 111.0G • *1.4.* •P 'i 114- .4.10 I, ... i : i 'j usurj,",..2 .,. lEAdarvElgAI,ON 16.58).CONFIRMED Fff EARIIITALC. (-)•- Ii I i i . • i i / ,. • I I g - L .,...., , ,:".11 i . . , ,-i. , 1/ .6.. ,. ,• .._ -„,.. , ••mis4r, ., •1,1-trzo-m,;ororug,=,.?„,urgol.) , •ocrugruN VOLUME REWIRED-12.60D CP •!II ' tirIM 11.,., , Li, ,t1:4: 1!!!IIMPliKi .... / ,,, ,. , •MOM.PUTIOo sma.PRPHIDED-4.027 CP IIIIIIPOIdi 3 •17.02 / 11 i 1111f=111111 •:a.z.• ,.,..„,..+eft •I,:12 .kaA00 :11 . LEGEND 5 --: 1 - .„, ,17•OGY 3 •17.12 .,. ,, • . ,:, „,„,„„s .- 5L. 8 !••.....„, 6 EXISTING SPOT PIEVATIGNS , 1 , .,..,.: '.•-•‘1..,_,1 / ,,,,,..,‘ •'1\7 • 7.24 • •13.20 -. 7. Dn..°GROUND CONTOURS g";.• g ' • I 1, F1 tOt 11•13 g i 111118 'EC MICE •14 , ii.41011.MMII : '4.• ,gi, . t., \ • ,2 . ,y \ \ AREA ABOVE 100 YEAR R.00OPLAN ELEVATOR •17.313 .4_ , ok . •16,5 r\-- DISPUCEMENT AREA WITM2 \ \ • 1 1....t . . . 100 VW 0000 RAN P:h2 '''':20•g:Iti 1 IIIIID .. ''''''' II • t. . \ N• 1 1 \ l VI 1 , , 44 ',, •17110.'. 4*71.1 •17 311P..• ' -NG•.--....• g a 1--.y.z.x. .. • C ------',,,, X'‘. N'•• '''N , lb..-104164160khlkhk;Iii.' 4.' MI_ •.22 .-7;'..-t,''''''' ''.'1'.VIII7lifilleiAliF--.I".--_,:,;;;-.:,,-.-:-.,___..--.-, ....- ....-:"..7.:-.. ----I-IL,,,i,i2g --- -740,-7:-• --- '-'5 0 iz.•9 - •,,,,,, — •.. „.. . 1...: =F.,.. • .-.....--- ..... § .* .\_cc t,T.g, '-- . . l'"'.. A. EX.24.-50 •—PE MR- EC jr II - • 01.snaa-r uarr CR.CAR ,Y2- • ...',..,E.,,, ELEVATOR-1BM DC MEET LICIrt --421441- --PMIR- • • 4 • -.--.-F,43- - • . I I.' Syi 18th gl'INgET --2,-.6- -„ _._22 SIREELUBBL..,....6_ _.Ex_pjGB,LAE.;.... -..,..,.,..-kyftt•Fr.--41r,7,-7r,,r,44160" ,,w,i67775-,,,....rett41113.7,Trc.T.F.V.r73777.4"57} ,4:V<:,.z.--sk.1-7,,,,..4,,:a..E.H.....;...,2.;,,,....i.1;3..3.-w.LU-41.3%?,"...4.`-^-7,1,','Uf.".4,1",, .1.4_,I.2.i.2,,,, --— :Plik'''''',6'^'.' "-^"'''`,'-:`,”''',''''''';'''.:At '"': ,,,1 4,,...",,7' %•.:+:4 74;4',',-'1,1.'!"......,,,,,,,....,....: .. .• .... ..., .-4........ :-.1 . , ,.. i ..•• .-......4, . . . ., , . ...-:.__.sigu_iec,x,...,...,,,,,,,.,_.,...,... •1_3......um-mu.-_.-2....v......Alte.--4_)-2....o•-•..... •.........2mOcm•-•-•-- nit F.4_,...,11 4 e-z-a. - 1 7112r-- A ..,.....t.,..).;.,...:_____ "41•42,,,r.:.c. ..)63 ;Alt, 6: .... g- 1 ..- 27 — /1..rt...5.,,,,,,..? 0., .d A i .7.• - --- -15C2V-16--- 0,s,0Zr'll. 91, II' •4‘. F __MCI. Re a.snerrr MO 1•'••••. i CRY OF RENTON 17.°** ....:::PrIMAIMOTT OP 1•••/121-1.10/01•11G8 .... .._FLOOD STORAGE COMPENSATION EXHIBff -2..22 VW.. 44.••• GM § b Z •22.13 Il• AMMill . .... ... .......4.44110 AG_ MIME....r.232: . 11.•••••__1••••_ LI 7 8 ° owe.wed..• MKT PP ed 1.1.1....11WP0111,11•07',....TILMAIN NM-V,n. 11.1,11....mAntlese 17.11 .....lo.I......1,V... 71049-1,14/14,-1.1,91.1,-C it TREE CUTTING / LAND CLEARING PLAN _ _ _ _ _..- SS LL C7 .-___.-_.-_._.._. .- ..14`I I _- , - t - - i t°;�1" Ar3.3 - CI- iCLEM1110 I- r• \ su - t Oam w aD=ZL S \ .. i ` ;r• / TFgE CUTTNCI LAIC CIEAF�q NOTES�'eao °O i9IB-•+ v. 3 Q -- y,,... t, '•A :: Rnor•olm GLIgreuFw u:WAS MILD.SOORG PERMS 1, O'3. / .314!F 1.r.' 1 � o Z S5V`1 1 I I .s t.. / ; ,•r 1430,'.[G Emrw CH-�JE C-OrrAndi 'fit f .;w r d ba O:az'J 11 O '1 1 t ' i t • rJGro i'/ iWESTD CANOPY' REO ALM.BUG(Gs11G.at1U,PACIFIC wLLC•,bq "••.•"'- ('� Q:. "\ : Y SCRUB$11RUB UR3re 1®00uscop.91Ba®M,*W .}�).CC U ( 1 f•.•f' ) y! s.Po is.as O• I'� r"' so"�0rr wruBrnwlav xc Itlmwcuv,sunwmsmns e x i .+,.ao \'`2ao4 j„ {�J , / •t 'ib 4GH.LAIN f1301 C S•WRY BUdfI1Wa',IONIC MOW:,f 2a TQ, '', •41.420 III -I tt p ¢ .)a'I 'Cs I'.`stBo:JI"a:•ir_ou •• • t Ik /O,e ••f4• / i.s•a 04)937,2•'O?max �\ m + -)aR t,xw m • LLI 1 t•.j• sac • ®,. / .4!4 /�.�.co :� �''>.w T d Qn.:) < O,>.� ' I I i.( ii. i sa0 fG.ce 1 j e- d z. ,• . F'1 q I y i j i i j `s i ,y .:a>. / ( 1 1 O f } s>.ou 7 z i • /.:R k.__" i J I .a• i - , A.�sn .Iwis i,a G \�( f / /'1p / ' / i it :X/�asM ,{ 'xx�, 1 ii .W. Gz.z s .•x ury ,,.x I:xosi,a.. lt,i.ca>I,`Vfat4Jo' ¢¢ fINICNJ unTh ' \;xas'xQ' ' it O p € Z I i O t'tR.ao / O d / ijw.ac O 1 I iI z ›-+Z vt N . i ,\,sas �•� \ !' `S:ax +eas l {.!hseo;n ¢� Ua w i i 6U) 1 i1, a tf /r‘,� ®Y :� 0o• 'i,r \\ 10 I Q n �ayFp n \ t /`� 11 •:,, Q.Ix '',boa / ;CAI .ib.co •txaa O Or ,\, I :aao l o f 1 .:R<A J I W YI 0 , i eb.!C /: T 1 i.Q _.., ` .,, +x- I ,i p 5 bi t .Is:o ;'x+f,.s 1 ,� �'--�pg._� 4. r�'t'�' I 2 b.r 1� r7 _, •peso 1 j �1 n/:ax< ) d / Oo Od , �t r 'CT")----t: .-..2'',�>ar .:b.ao Oi-., / /_ ;��l I"4'IMOU ... ' % 0+*+� .i) ,o L:xm fR 4a {1:'.W:,> i•-.4CZW t •! a.... Q T TT 'd JCj r : ,r..ra;, 4.a,az, 1 VR1 1 S } 1 j f. O r•,<at% i Q�� r ,Y t�x[7{y)y1r a, 1 P " sr / nd / OQ ', / f .!r ,� ,i T O '?Qua '� ,a$•Ola.• z• d .s<:a/n .'./ / `-`"'x d ' °' �1, 1 ` i', ai..4 ° (�}t��I ram,yam"_• / • a at :>.G��wtase la<x [Q)f 8,.s, T , i F �/ 0.0D ,f r \dO,/ 1 Q f W 1 + ! / , ,14 11 ).1'.i: sd l..t,()•0• d :x d Q,T.s.^. \\ �,l OD • 11:.00 �.. .....�¢__...._- 1 O sszl aoc d r ,n m ; 1 ; i ! / /Q' d ,7 / i Q:az o: a' nce ! r ' r s"Q:`y °r V+x`Rs �°'."ro O:'dL / RB�).:e d ,:t Qn.. \ O1enx°.I '\ v:-- lull ! >< K i i iffc �q,Rta / % �[T O..as O:`:ror ir-s►..la •..z: per` _ • d 7 O• kMOD jtaa: g1 L.0 ( I Aa< ° ' �' '� ..,.::.n j K ,40d O 6�i Ya>,,r d i f�aW - '� 3 tx+o tau' <.)3.aR :._p / 1 j Ql'►'�' r 04.404331 O`' d ro..\ ^n w I \O OM. r a.4fl,,. .<so T j 1 Q.x:c d 0 s�O))�zA: 'may `\ \:aos I n^ 1 •, i a.u'\` di gs ILa' d la' •.•aa0�., a K+ 'sQ: TO O, • . d dQ:-.aa O D:..,s \. i H W i \ : ti.a, di.4#11 Q:.a1 d �ra:s O ) z;� .` ollaS: s Y'- a 1 t OtR,. °°� Q,) ):M 1. T CPU. T d x�.� G.� \,>.x °.6.n„CV:,` ) • t p::.xo T a> T O t :az Q„01.. ,,s,o m 4.t4 .1.. \.• �.,_.,'' L.BQ.- \.l`L OS j .. c�s.B(x.•G'h r•.x�d�'_.._.. .'-�J- -. - -. - ...........__—. :T�,." -iS-j � - y •aY�t ..pap" .. .. e O4 U 0, M/,C el. �) -.46- -- x`.3a— ss.... � __�. --. --yam_ --�A, IZ _•., ---°�•A,pu_ _ '\"yp. y.x t = — N'E ...:s may+. --" ... C.. T..._ x,ti Frl:t a� c tk sa - al.x�Bo Q �,sroB.t:ctt• Od b ' maVI I y+ oR Oc Gw Vat 1 MET fnlrt > DI. IX!MET Lint ilBl? [-aee 2.' • EX I Mr 1CIIf anti S . --Pt„- —,...►-— Or uu, —a+r - —x:. ———--f_>'y°�'g -"'va — --—— a +' CRY OF RENTON -- e91 - -- I�raRTa�Ier Of•PUaLIc WORK✓• eta fat _ r-a _ _Ali _ 4.•-. - ....... _ U.CAS _v Br •II - ♦♦♦ -•-an•. u 7a _ a a• • • • • • 8W 1gy1 T csr-•---- ---- y_Ir.- S Tf�CUTTNO/LAIC CLEARING �, • _ PLAN ;,?R!3.:\ R-e!a -' T--r^29.,..T 'eMg.;g -•'.-,�.�',5..'"....(ia4< P- r ..za z1.oR `i+if:':{< ,,��, wF `4.i:.1 ;',y... e � :^:.�,�'�:•.•- .:a r. r*� 1�. F...y.=..r`: ;t�r+s%y'. ti. to::L":;, =ii�YL�'�s"�� a'',ii:;`i•�+ i:.�-' �...;-'�:� .c:j�w.ili_`v:.s� 'i-ti�ia:.s::.�r--' �'iS.id�` 4eM �:s= �'� ��eoa v)v.. alss ox mom fa .. m ..w ow 8 •R 8 • Flew. RA we a.a. .w.... a. ..»D FT—SS—TM 'milr+s.a- CITY OF PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE —� I =.` RENTON PLANTING PLAN -- RannmSS/9uilaing/Pubf won,.ORO N0. REVISION 9Y aAiE ,RE, PPa �� E Gregg Zimmerman P.E..Administrator CANDLEWOOD HOTEL ._.. ..-- 1ry;a I I i Y;�, r,i 1.".., 1 1. ( 11 fr X w PACIFIC A S,W.{VACATED) I J F,.II :J'.. I r,.i x X '1I.I l Thr' y I �u t t'5710 o 7 F8' ? I I 1 10. ' ' 4111 i : r" '�'' ? ISOfl a'T�a��='0, . , a��"0"i 4:iT-`1,. ,l'i'i; • r I rvS4 i 1 ., 1 ' Ii b',4. ,F+.._...i p .. IMO ._..I .. 1 l l!! I'Illll'l . Hlp! 1 • "1""it: e .it a II U, t, IN ,7.2 1 h ,;,',,;:, • Ttey,, ,;:ii,--ti r R3 1 ' I i ; . .. r l 1 i;ltit C I .a.. ; 3 `¢ tt t • � 3 !l: +•..r' ;.. • ' "`- -,. 1 I ,Ilil 1,Iti I. • 11 1 AI I i x I 1• 1 w.c — ,F. ' 1I' • v / _ ��)l,y.ry i 1 j 1 I'11 I I s f{{a_yt �■i.'•._ S _l I '3 '•.� ..t 1p:" i `1, �n •yY 1 I ,Y�, 'I•+1 • O ■ -, /,. �tTS �. 1 !# '1 1 1 V/ fit 1 ;.t;1I 1: ' i Y1 1 � � II ,, m i I I I ;• A aaa a •s E, D• II \ ii5I I' Ea. 1�. 1,-.):: \\\\` a �' i Z `a' I ! Ta 1 Y1 l' e--,1 h± I t-. } ? a a .,��� it t„i -�\N�II '' ti fit :j 1 -x i f 1. . ; a ji b,,,1,f, ,'l 'V > l r : 1 /%441 rc S G i- r. tax \.is Il II. '� :J r/ ra a'.i r{`+'ii','Y t.e e fyi./ r. 4 lW `N♦ l... I I F ,1.oily .`-t91f#:.^ ' i 'r ;14" 3 t`°t^,` • 1•1 I'.r , 1 I' let;itirI ' 'f r`.' 1 a . . I;; G xv1. l ' I iI 6' F E ° "S l I t 1( . /:� `-.J / �� g �' i, G I. Celle' Ili; op s • ? T i 14!I Als, , , , _ ,..S.aw 4= _...W _ ., h II I I1 .� - - r.a�� A� rY S� :i�`j! ; "Iiirt1.11P ; SYMBOL MaE sa COMM SWIM arm. 'aral ... PLANT PALETTE/LEGEND END a 1.0 ao:.Urfa/ It-w• mum v n,...My a+a Ma .a .'.,I. .ea. Swan MN. 40 .a.M..,/ it-I• . ..•Yam'.a.•ma®. MOM MR 1 O eea / r-r..a.. .MN. ...a...-e Man * Ma WOO. 1r Moor -2.1. aaa.0 r Pal M..a.. ` :11� r-S M;� w.la. a..ma Seam o e,a •M,/ S-w• comma r, resEno. 'iill a a nwam•/ tn.a. .e e a snot M.�t�:rii,`�s..Euc.�".m move • 1.910 MOO ® Ora war it-M• a Mu r ism. r•�1 _ awml/ 1.S as =ean.t.s oaoaa ,r-s.• i / ow ..a M saw, arras.Sou:.aav ai:r..-w ewe.o Q awru ram oe-t ve.n ae oo.. +`1Y .n a.' '.n•a .1gv'Oalio :fir°' i t'a no,.Fla o C11 •••• r 4 * �ae-a �a,we®. • ° .IMO/ Irate see aM... Me 'H.,Mee.. '°' I a. i I i <„ aw,, r M. a COO ` - ••• AB OM..a.,. Oasaws m: p a..raw.Bier/ •r Nam re re r we mom No an,Mess ow. ate., r r MORO It MO pan It Ia eat.M'r ma m"°.. MMa.r/ r-I•C 0 aMws r-r are.w INIEL -,ser a. a'�s'.M.o�.....a. _I' r as nu. ! '"I"am,,:z NW/ 'r ar te r:•?: "-,1 ®uM''Soma.a a,awe an a ,O�wul Y.'aeu 0 MY/ I aYa, wl MN Y n.wwPs u.,/. a et-Mr MOWN C.vww/ 0 LOOM MO.Sena) C e ,arnmml ,.oI a fa. . �.,Vwa,a,mI-wr wwlw r ...... ...._� u'''n.xm aa-M.aa I I� i $ PIP efS' 18215 72ND AVENUE$W1M TR7�• LOCATION S m Z KENT,WA 98032 CANDLEWOOD HOTEL COMPANY 900 BLOCK OF S.W.16TH STREE ��� Gia _ (4zs2sl-sz22 8080 EAST CENTRAL RENTON,WASHINGTON (425)251-8782 FAX v ] WICHITA,KANSAS 67201 N `WN....0. SURVEYING, ,O 1.1EMAPI.VI B.CE JOB NO. 6882 r- B Plantng Notes and Metered° i.e.,v. t !I IIEl..ALLE. I El. L ER.a.LEVEL E.u.AOIE AND MATED s EEOSSO 10 Acww,aN ,i2-PON CMGs.FEE WY 0-FOOT LOOMS m(2 v 2 x B) (n TM MAIMS MD PRVNW.TmN Of SOB.OM.GYM.MOMS Of SMARM RAM MENSAL: L ` WICH°MDICI OY INS 0.OBOE MASH.CLF-ALP.OEMS REEVE AND SOLE _INCH ME POLYEENYON ELAN LOCK TYPE TIES M,5/B•DANEru AMBER.NO WIRE 'wN)T :, �2 iul»w u> • rs fnDu— CON (NSW.s SPECIE. W 0_ _Rwz�x x: :;�.,...,. ,.N PK GRou.cGlna:r WOOF.w Io W°mnHs ar oxE PNWm(aW u)IETOInox(Lv-z:). As ialm of riAr2r usrr. SMAME IMILAR)PER OM, aHaH cwu Ar B:I .. Q>NiMCIP.YNL Bf L ro PSPORY iHF ID[fRLuID MrHW°ME PRE"PSWwc µYECE'�ED sVf TAM:.•/.REHw vE11 DETML. VAC.K CAL1ID our 11AR) SOaE(uAv),,o:,(nrq Z 2 ABamICEIDrI. • R.w/RwE ur PREMED sueonADE CO 0O — AR COONWES: ®S NOT R.%SOO AS BINDER • N PLAN.SOD MALL INCLUDE BLUEGRASS FOR BINDER. • - ,MAX IS DE COMOAcrare RSPOEORM To ROES THE SAE AND REPORT un rim ii\� how r�"uuLr„> H TRBGpMP06 W THE aWIAEA M D.MEWS REPREsdoTnES. ALL PLAN MTW,L AND SOD AS NOTED BC txc ma \\\\ Z FEWER OWES NEE EWES TO APPROVAL BY THE MEER. PDL EDc BY VAS LA.5 ECKTES CCMPAM. OE Off PLAN.PLAI "I" \�\\�Oi\\ OF TANDY 'DMMONIE DISTRIBUTED '�:_ POWER BALL DM.MOMS SM.ro DO»Dr MET uME oMA wrt"�ow• K P"'Wi.YEi "GEII( )32]-07 OR EDGR °� E 1a IgRo GRAMr UST �':\i •r 3 Q CONImuCIIGA OPVAII NS TM.COMM,PHAVE BEEN COMPLETED. qyP xDIE: N E r Q a m z WALES w x'UNTIL wMcf2mOw we e¢»TESTED Hu. E a NOT RECDLwoIDED fu nc r2m Yv,L AFmA BarNUTOII. *OUM.v'PM 1 M1 p (off Z Q,, 8 A SYSTEM NMI.PLAN.WIN WE- ROOT SETO p�A�� o `J wmi11Dvv/ra°P REP1ACE AND 1p1S ons..L.Lsuuacrm Inro OE wNE°R°Ai NO °O°" """-0oC"A^' MEOW, '� BBBYL�(CGa SMLAR) 1F� ADDITIONAL COST YRLr-PRODF;Ae Howe rape ro BEMIort m.a RUDE.xRE A THROVE sEPmABER Spacing Detail Planter Section faol.Al E VARK.REPAIR ALL EXISTRO PLANT.ARE.BY nNISHED NODE.Ho RE-MULCHING ro SPECIFIED DEP7PRUNING DEAD swu a KEPT canwAll MEOW BerNrArpIL NORMITY ROOT WATER POOR AMOR 10 OMEN. MO wroBAL onNvm o SITE SCALE.NONE (((JJJ7)7 IXfGngN: SCALE)NONE FINISHED DRADES Z QYrt£ING EAL PERIOD OF ONE YEAR ER.OWE OF FINAL PELIO.E FOREIGN Oa6R UAI 1W0 NECKS Ir)OWNER. 0 (QQn Q U ACCEnN+CEME OWNER 111 MN RACES LO TOP THREE IND1ES NELY�NPACTER .0.ON 1 E RNA.AM OF PREPARED PLAPITIND E. AIL C DOOM SITE M - 01 JQ CONDUCTOR STALL PROVIDEAND YrtN A SCOPE ON OF WORK A FOR 90 Y-TINE FOLLOW.YS PCONTEMN c..L E..S. ♦ GRAM SOIL UNDER MULCH POO m NOTES COMETO PROVIDE LANDSCAPE Q OF PROJECT(ACCEPTANCE) DESCRIBED E)OF NDTL uVLCH A ] MULCH(SERUM.] LOSE EBELOW A RANTING AND ERUTON EWNTENwtE AaYME PES Dx SE w PROPOSE LOCATORS PS OPw S EXCAVATE m. MO ((`jj!I STA< GOO 0,AND INOUE. ALL O M AND SUPPORTS TO STAND T R'wi SwGIM' 'ABwE GMDE FINISHEDGRADE TREES S.1 BE PYCED AS SHOWN HE MEWL P.N. E LOCATED DETAILEDr,„._,,,„ 'MATERIALS- • AS GACALLED OUT ON PLANT L.Y. SPOILS EILL USING 2'INA.(CauPACTEW wx WATER NO IIECIONIGI CGAPCTON PLANT MATERIALS SNALL NO.I.SEED IN ACONEWICE TM RICAN SHRUBS: I STAND..NFOR NURSE STOCK CRAB ((NY -W O. PRUNES M MOVED MOM OM M ALL gyp.,AR sPECN,ED fo1 TREES O 14,51,1 °D'SII•r WINCHESE SRAM AND PE,,TONT.•'Ix NNER ISB d BARE ROOT:TA' • '"I W CALIPER AT 6.ABOVE SOIL LJN,...INDICATES cDN . EXCAVATE PITS:TO A THREE INCHES ))BE1.MO TIMM rK ROOT.1 q �� — DR a.0 vzL Esr.B.ls a°u�I,;,,u P,.Y.'v",w�"Nom�o�°:a eE THOROUGHLYi TAKE.RE�o ROOT CROWN a a ........ '; \ M.RR PUN p G>ti.Z, p II)QUALM, STATE MD FEDERAL LAWS FORD PRWrDm. DIAMETER.iwnE'L"is DEEMED. ROOTBA-L SPREAD . j�NTNm t Q E PUNT/LATERAL S.LL COMPLY ur LNE BE VCORO S WELL FOENED,NTH MULCH A DROUNO COVER MARS NOT C VORO2 MULCH APPLE°POOR TO °O ORO O Rome': Z F y _ TRIMS ROOT TOGETHER.SFCDREL. .°NUS PROTECTED o 51.1 "Y`I BE SOuD wuRY AND °11iL c""'"O°''`"""Id'° GALLON CONTAINER SUE. Fla TO BE SETTLED USIM.Gel OE•—=—". Planting Bed Adjacent to Lawn Q z D 2 5wE(ONE s 'W P1A""�pEp1DEiNNEOi-rzu°vB»w6 E RECT TO NO B D.N.cE•OR ROOTS LACK 5514NETRY,NAVE�I HAVE TYLn.DG.LC.RAM LOCATIONS FOR.-rnm sEP.wrIGA of T�,«ue No 2-FOOT I MEnA) a a r..1 �a LEADERS EmomooLOR 5 Y SOSOCAEs LESS TEsS� EGREEs IN TREES.OR 00 NOT MEET 555 •PUNT. µ ULTALF IT'D"CR GOUM°O/FX FROM FIRE»AORYIIS Al.Ullury SWATS. 0 c STNMRDS SHELL RE A SING ID PLANT NAM.SEPL1 Mm♦F OIITaACitll SMALL WAPEAP PJNaArd THROUGH COM'IEO N.• ALAOON s" LL ACCEPTANCE OF ROT T wNO GYolfldCOver Planting Dotal J u� IiE1IDE WATETANTS roaT TAG miG U SHNO SETS. C)uE`D�1°;,,,/t "`°w�woREDD».oR R�""`RE„Fos<LOCATED NOR.OF,HE.z»D .L WEDGY OP.GRAM OR POSIT.. ISCALE ROHE cDLTDP,I SOIL oEPTN iw""``°m"°o») W a iis SUMMIT.OF%PAT WATIM.SPELES OR VA.,WLL BE PERNITTTED GRADES:ANO MOWING LAMAS 71 -C& OR DEAD PIANrs Avo PlAvrsw E'"Lnss aE w PEacon DR15ImRE or m 5 FELT g �� IiL ; °iSARc"II E"CrI.E.SPmFsi SnWi"RE f NALTNCTONNA B A/ TUTHE1Y14Ra MAY RE SWOPE TO THE STE,OR TO[EWAN w REDDIR PROPER AND PUNT J. SAUCER FOR OF AG STE.AS NO7E0 ON TNE g I,y ,A"^L1R� _ _ DON MATEWNCE OR mA L ON UPOmuED sA6RAOE r MAX igi! u.DMT.R °GE SO.REPORT L DATUMS MOORED P D SCOT.POF.l,AND MO FOR By H wECNNIC RM DE SOLO • 4a�(g ti Parkilg Lot PNntxa(Topsol Prep.) ALP R MRE NUT L ,TOPSOIL CONSISTING OF__ Evergreen Tree Planting(6'To 10'Fiph) D C TO 7 PERCENT ORGANn.BELOW.�TNBEE OENOE SHALL O ARM SPECIFICEPTH N E.)WM.BELOW. SC NON CORRESPOND TO Nu mLAENOD OFN,°EiEPmE,'OWE.O SO TE>TURE LOW" 9 y ffi NO • RECESS.,U.S. CONTROL REs OFTOPSOILN CONTAMINATEDCT RESPONSIBLE RC Co% ..L • V .:R.tM•M. B)SUM MEAL.SOIL E MT N T TEXTnED TOPSOIL CCIOITON IIli�, GW. > j 11111 SUMO sEL.-SITE MT NET TExTOal EAsslOurmN AS IN AG..ABORT:_ COMM. PRUNE Twos AETER PLANT. °���1j 9f► �' TO • HIED MP.. IN c)I.AND cl 2_ x MIN 1(—I T.BrEv,eD DERIH. Cl MOOlnn r PVEF ANGv roSnIDE DOUBLE LEVERS WLL E IEECrtD _ 1. C COMPOST T°OPP°nOIL ER TMG SNE L Comu".'m°I O 20µPERCENT COMCTIr TERM BY — M oFRm 1 LV ..LSE ME FOLLOWING a FOR TO 26 ORGANIC ORGANIC M OEM ON SS MOD IRASC PS NOTES PM PM TO BE REMR£ o N m Y �W TWICE DINE INCHES(TWO INCHES C OE.CEPTNC Of COUPCST PER T = — '� "'E NOTE ND PROTECTED AT NL n1F9 i i £ pOHO OE BPE°IFEDD OEM MOO RUSHEE* ONROSE.SLYE/COMOST .mY1R o RcroM a xomwl O OR.RISE NOW ONO.ONCE W .T x Dr No uss FROM 05S Mulch NE Orb ^;H Y a A m em BIN MACH sNa scan wOR F aE ww s B I N W COMPOST: RE FROM INN-EARN AMYL SOURCES.FOR SOURCES rN rRMNI �L WAG`ow1pO RE SETTLED MPG MD.ONLY- scar:NONE COMNMND°EOWDDO/CEDM PRODUCTS. NE H H S H ''COMPUTE PERMED WmH TMCE ELDETas,eIPERCEM SULFUR AND A MINN. TRETimber Header AT ALL CUTS row,—1 G3Ea;Bo'a''Ean".F HP1A1pEL ''G«�-°°oacK;:EmH n GW. .k m x� a • • OF m PERCENT SU.RELEASE NITROGEN. ER SWLL BE 14.0-DELUI¢ )) NURSER-10-15-20 AT 50 TOO.PS 10 rams OF OR.NIC COMOSE,w OR MOOR GOES U w M OE FOND mIVARELI WIROC N EEAwEN. MOLE AFTER ONE GOWwc SEASON ��� LH'B'GB,., O)PLANT.OR-SO MCO1L RER '"'S" CO'EAP°IE 0""CrIVxn''GFM TO"."•"I'LL. " v a OR-SO TOPSOIL All (EXCAVATED Pn SPOILS)AS GELD PROMO O FOR OF TOPSOIL P K g • • 4/A�s y1pPfupiwyll n .Pf rRF,.ro NE T:waEs MrLa of TOPmL PER TUM RANTwt N J 1 I c„.r 14,... 020E 10AN CEP° 1E'ADA WOO OR AND SUPPLY IA,. oL0 YE°�NIITR'M"IT.0,o E THE Ia,O•r DEEP STATE OF.E wort MO STSr NOM IC,E,OE.HUSH ON RC PLN6 NE,OLOEIS SWELL �//— ,^ •W BE nmLY YOOyC INRmRiBRIT TIE 111P B-NEQ TOPS..INL E WOOED O FINISHED GRADE WA4MNClON V C m°°y 51.-=811..ACIED TAR IOwI,RNIDIOEI.SOIL OEM SECS=IS MASHED. ESBSIm OWE II w"CDEmI OF ROOTS,BPECS,AT OR-LOOSEN NO IC +' HAND REGISTERED ARCH TECT n'e''Of SOIL TO ROOTS,WO TRES.ALL oM i PARKING RAMS m•Em SMALL RE OM EXCAVATED WV NEMO%WSW PATO _ IN.SWAP)REMOVE DES. SCAM, CNI O PER TAT IAMB.a . N %MOW D.Of PAWS. NS =1 I I I 1 i i I_ .TARED" _ ; WORM AND :ro M.uE ma.nAW m WIN m E a sYNEs AT s o.c D OWE OR..e m MOUND WAD.AL WNn NET.x.R A RN) CfTY OF RENTON WIN MASH(+ D): T IJQrAH'TWAQI•IT Or rUaLlc W DNE-HOE-OGH(m SITE.TO O E-BEM oi.I.E.,LOON:EE mR N I I I11 111 I •L POIEmA,IDN) .E PENETRATOR TO Svee tE(.),r WORKS APPLY MEMOS ONST V NI PROMS NEEE PEES(5)TO MLR (n DEPIN ------ ---- wm �w Tus. AOUH.I.E.'STORM MOUE AM CEDM ARE N NRSHED FROM E ME oMss -, LANDSCAPE NOTES V.Mom I..'o P.te•TC: Deciduous Tree Dotal AND DETAILS Vinyl Ecting Dotal ro 5 (B and B,Lees Than 3'Die.) 01.R. N. Rs - SALE.NONE �_w v2sne SCALE NONE R N. III e .,E m R... PL2 a 2 U a...� OS val MSI 800 S.W. 16th, LLC 1109 First Avenue, Suite 500 Seattle, WA 98101 Benaroya Capital Company Bitney Grouws Company 1001 -4th Avenue, Suite 4700 108 Factory Ave. No., Suite 1 Seattle, WA 98154 Renton, WA 98055 Cummins NW, Inc. 811 S.W. Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 International Business & Institution City of Renton City of Renton 335 - 116th Avenue S.E. 1055 South Grady Way 1055 South Grady Way Bellevue, WA 98004 Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055 r a ; „+ j I CANDLEWOOD SUITES HOTEL "M ,��1 I I j VIC NIIY MAP ' •.\ 1 t �� g. „„., ,.- GsA01 -row- 16,TT11 n{in'" u 1.111 ' N �3 �. a e °ITII r + Gi !a �Y y� w+ L � fs c 1-- a i -pn L ",��� yy�al�1 ''yyt��unj��I, ' ; a ill�me. 1 JO ;tfdv };n„iainnN., + �� !++ '"L�,a. F!!I�I f�l� 7 �'+efgfiNQ ' 911 LLIIIYYYYY c P' n1 r■ ■■ n =F- iTERSTATE---^HWY•-_—a5Y ... �1l+l�t �� -`� !w Q W as 1 c,VACIA"T`' ,.. Q apitao Vr iiiiiiii P.,I�..,a�17, �: SW. 16TH sr , , '1:'I e 3 1 DAY CARE :---I OFFICE _ �,y} 4 icy. _, it P �_,y l�hn� y I 1i1=�c \ l-- / 'HI- _,11-1L--_1 - L4- ! I .. -, a a \ '; ,. H `�"'. ---, OFFICE '�y n �9Dfil� 1$ --I I a _i I CITY 1 F RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department J e Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator May 5, 19!a9 Mr. Bruce Creager Barghau:en Consulting Engineers 18215—.,2nd Avenue South Kent, W/ 98032 SUBJECT: Candlewood Suites Hotel Project No. LUA-99-029,SA-A,ECF Dear Mr Creager: This letter is to inform you that the comment and appeal periods have ended for the Environmental Review Committee's (ERC) Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the above-referenced project. No appl:als were filed. This decision is final and application for the appropriately required permits may proceec. The applicant must comply with all Site Plan Conditions of Approval. If you h 3ve any questions, please feel free to contact me at (425) 430-7219. For the Environmental Review Committee, eter Rosen der• Projec Manager cc: Property Owners Candlewood Hotel Company, Inc. FINAL 1055 South Grady Way- Renton, Washington 98055 ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer S-GHA(/O CIVIL ENGINEERING,LAND PLANNING,SURVEYING,ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES V Tr,,.,�Z DEVELOPMENT MANIOC= m r CITY OF RENTON c - '1�� April 1999 °o z APR 2 ;, 1999 RECEEVF D Peter Rosen City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 RE: Comments on the SEPA Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance and Site Plan Approval for the Candlewood Suites Hotel Project Renton, Washington City of Renton File Nos. LUA99-029, SA-A, ECF Our Job No. 6882 Dear Peter: This letter is being sent in response to the City of Renton Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance and Site Plan review decisions issued on April 13, 1999. Specifically, we are writing to confirm that the City will correct the record with respect to the following item: • SEPA Mitigation Measure No. 2 should be revised to state "this fee is estimated at$34,695.96." Justification: The estimate was calculated at$34,695.96 in the discussion of fire impacts(page 3 of 14 of the City's decision document); however,the incorrect number of$38,228.32 appeared in the Mitigation Measure. Additionally, I would like to confirm my understanding of the "Advisory Notes to Applicant." Specifically, it is our understanding that the second sentence,under"signs,"Item No. 2, regarding the frontage along S.W. 19th Street, should be deleted. Also,please clarify the comment under"Parks,"which stipulates that"the trail on S.W. 16th Street needs to be retained and connections made as required." What does this condition mean? Does the condition conflict with the requirement to construct frontage improvements(sidewalk,paving,etc.)? Thank you for your attention to the corrections noted above. Please notify me as soon as possible if my understanding is incorrect. Sincerely, Bruce K. Creager, AICP Director of Planning Se s BKC/jss/ph 6882C.015 cc: Chuck Zernickow, Candlewood Hotel Company (w/enc) Jeff Melby, Weis Builders, Inc. (w/enc) Daniel K. Balmelli, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. Brian D. Smith, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. Chris S. Ferko, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT,WA 98032 (425)251-6222 (425)251-8782 FAX • • City df Renton P/R/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Environmental Review Committee Staff Report CANDLEWOOD SUITES HOTEL LUA-99-029,SA-A,ECF REPORT OF APRIL 13, 1999 age 3 of 14 2) Water Impacts The applicant has identified a wetland in the northwest corner of the site. A wetlands report has been submitted by B & A Inc. The report describes the wetland as an excavated area that has been refilled, and therefore the wetland is occurring on top of fill material. The wetland is 1,850 square feet and is identified as a Category 3 wetland. Category 3 wetlands that are hydrologically isolated and are less than 5,000 square feet in area are exempt from City wetland requirements. In this case, impacts to the wetland would not require compensation and the required wetland buffers would not apply. Surface water flows presently sheetflow into the existing wetland and flows then exit the site to the north out of the wetland and into a constructed open drainage channel. The open channel conveys surface water flows from east to west and eventually flows into a large underground vault east of Oakesdale Avenue SW. Water is then pumped from the underground vault under Oakesdale Avenue SW and eventually released into the Springbrook Creek. The wetland on the site is considered hydrologically isolated because surface flows exit to a man-made drainage channel that flows to an underground vault before being pumped for release to Springbrook Creek. The proposal would not fill the existing wetland. Stormwater from the proposal would be treated and detained in a combined wet pond/detention pond facility and then released into the wetland before exiting the site. The wetland may be used in this manner because it is considered exempt from City wetland regulations. The developed conditions would release the same rate of flow at the same location as the pre-developed conditions. The stormwater facility will be required to meet the design standards of the King County Stormwater Design Manual as adopted by the City. Approximately one-half the site is located below the floodplain elevation of 16.58 feet. A portion of the site is going to be filled, raising the elevation above the current floodplain elevation. The applicant proposes to compensate for this loss of volume in the floodplain by an excavating the northwest part of the site outside of the wetland. Compensation for the loss of volume in the floodplain should be provided and demonstrated in the Drainage Report calculations. Mitigation Measures Compensation for the loss of volume in the floodplain shall be provided and demonstrated in Drainage Report calculations. The calculations and amount of storage provided shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division. Policy Nexus NA. 3) Fire Protection Impacts The proposal would add new construction to the City which would potentially impact the City's Fire Department. A Fire Mitigation Fee applies to all new construction. The required mitigation fee is based on a rate of $0.52 per square foot of new construction. For the proposed development the fee is estimated at $34,695.96 (66,723 square feet X $0.52 = $34,695.96). The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable at the time that Building Permits are issued. SITERC2.DOC City bf Renton P/43/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval& Environmental Review Committee Staff Report CANDLEWOOD.SUITES HOTEL LUA-99-029, SA-A, ECF 'REPORT OF APRIL 13, 1999 ge S of 14 B. Recommendation Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommend that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINATION OF DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE NON - SIGNIFICANCE- MITIGATED. X Issue DNS-M with 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period followed by a 14 day Appeal Period. C. Mitigation Measures 1. Compensation for the loss of volume in the floodplain shall be provided and demonstrated in Drainage Report calculations. The calculations and amount of storage provided shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division. 2. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee to f $0.52 per square foot of new construction. This fee is estimate at $38,228.32. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of Building . , A A 6 beiS. `l 3. The applicant shall be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of $75 for each average daily trip associated with the project. The Traffic Mitigation Fee is estimated at $49,795.50. This fee is payable prior to issuance of Building Permits. SITERC2.0OC • City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Environmental Review Committee Staff Report CANDLEWOOD SUITES HOTEL LUA-99-029,SA-A, ECF REPORT OF APRIL 13, 1999 Page 6 of 14 Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. BUILDING Follow recommendations of soils report. Use current code 1997 UBC. FIRE 1. The preliminary fire flow is 3000 GPM, which requires one hydrant within 150 feet of the building and two additional hydrants within 300 feet of the building. A looped fire main is required by City Ordinance. 2. Separate plans and permits are required for the sprinkler, fire alarm, and standpipe systems. 3. Provide a list of any flammable, combustible liquids or hazardous chemicals that are to be used or stored on site. PLAN REVIEW Water 1. The Water System Development Connection Charge is$0.113 per gross square foot of site area, but not less than $850. 2. A vertical profile will be required showing the water system. 3. The project is located on the NE 24-23-4 quarter section map. 4. Construction plans to meet City of Renton Standards. Storm/Surface Water 1. The Storm System Development Connection Charge is$6,293.55. 2. Construction plans to use NAVD 1988 datum for elevations. 3. Drawings to meet City of Renton drafting standards. 4. Runoff collected from pavement surface with vehicle access/parking must flow through an oil/water separator or adequate biofiltration system. 5. Site drainage construction plans and erosion/sedimentation control plans are to meet the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual requirements. 6. If the proposed rockeries on the east property line are within 15 feet of the building, it will require a Building Permit. This is to be noted on the Civil Construction plans. Wastewater 1. The Sewer System Development Connection Charge is $0.078 per gross square feet, but not less than $850. 2. If the project produce fats, oil, or grease, then an appropriate removal system will be required per plumbing code. 3. Side sewer line to have a 2% slope to property line. 4. Construction drawing size is 22 X 34. 5. Provide floor elevation on construction plans. Transportation 1. New 5 foot wide sidewalks are required along SW 16th Street. 2. A minimum of a 5 foot wide planter strip is required between the curb and sidewalk. f 3. Back edge of the sidewalk needs to be in a sidewalk easement. SITERC2.DOC City bf Renton PA VPW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Environmental Review Committee Staff Report CANDLEWOOD.SUITES HOTEL LUA-99-029, SA-A, ECF REPORT OF APRIL 13, 1999 'age 7 of 14 AIRPORT The proposed construction is situated within the 179 foot maximum elevation area surrounding the airport. PLANNING 1. Garbage and recyclable deposit areas and collection points shall be easily and safely accessible to hauling trucks. 2. Sign code standards for freestanding signs are based on ratio of 1 1/2 square feet of sign area per lineal foot of frontage along a public right-of-way. The subject site does not haveJrontagealong SW 19th k; R Street and therefore may_not meet standards for signage and may have to share signage with the _ proposed-hbfet sou l of the site. PARKS All landscapir g outside of property lines is to be maintained by the owner. The trail on SW 16th Street needs to be retained and connections made as required. SITERC2.DOC CITY OF RENTQN ;CURRENT PLANNING DIVISIQIV AFFIDAVIT OFI SERVICE$Y MAILING On the 1`> day of 1.pv\i. , 1999, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelop containing "avId tLc►Slrh documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing efiukdl'wocd %ke\ C . v\ c Le_A c:5La (Signature of Sender) k, .m STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that /L� 9 • .�i ,QcJ signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act fore uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: 7�end fd, / et S a Notary Publi and for the State of Wa ' gton Notary (Print) MARILYN KAMCHFFF My appointmentet5ggi§cioN EXf IfCS G129/99 Project Name: coirjtectx)04Su.Acs 1 f te( Project Number: L.v cl q n 0251 , SW-ig NOTARY.DOC • 0 REPORT City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works DECISION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW & ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION REPORT,)ATE: April 13, 1999 Project Name: Candelwood Suites Hotel Applicant: Candlewood Hotel Company Owner Susan McLeod, Stuart Ness, Steven Ness File Number: LUA-099-029, SA-A, ECF Project Manager. Peter Rosen Project Decription: Proposal to construct a 133 unit hotel; a four-story structure with a maximum building height of 49 feet, 6 inches, and a total building area of 66,723 square feet. Access is proposed off SW 16th Street and there are 141 parking spaces on the site. There is a 1,850 sq. ft. Category 3 wetland in the northwest corner of the site. Category 3 wetlands which are hydrologically isolated and are less than 5,000 square in area are exempted from City wetland regulations. Project Location: 900 SW 16th Street Exist. Bldg. Area: N/A Proposed New Bldg. 66,722 s.f. Area: Site Area: 2.9 acres Total Building Area: 66,722 s.f. r: ,y CANDLEWOOD SUITES HOTEL may-- ', Y, r 1l I I VICINITY MAP i N i ✓=z92:-____1 I t01���s 15 1 +Ir n.w^ °` ••. Gfp�Y r11K L. ,1% +h•11•....•Ir. r,iSp OW"�� rr ,_1N� 6111 ••n + ;'h I $ ,`'.0,-.. tN,y• -it, J 111, ,,4 inet4061 4 W i • INTER__5_1.- . «.,, ,wAel a x ��._ S.W. Tf i6TH sr P •ti, - • _ ,;: 4 '.r ).1.' I DAYCARE .iwi`` _ __.Q -- _ tM- OFFICE \ '--- --- ryi v d - - - - -- .. — ;�4 i t'',i�'u.�- ' -- a ,.. I + -''e 3,_ . --- n c'gvvrh' --i ! OFFICE r u •f_i I Project Location Map SITERC2.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department •ministrative Site Plan Approval&Environmel.eview Committee Staff Report CANDLEWOC D SUITES HOTEL LUA-99-029, SA-A, ECF REPORT OF AP ZIL 13, 1999 Page 2 of 14 PAR f ONE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND The ,applicant seeks Site Plan Approval and Environmental Review to construct a 133 unit hotel a four-story structure with a maximum building height of 49 feet, 6 inches, and a total build ng area of 66,723 square feet. Access is proposed off SW 16th Street and there are 141 r'arking spaces on the site. Therm is a 1,850 sq. ft. Category 3 wetland in the northwest corner of the site. Category 3 wetlands which are hydrologically isolated and are less than 5,000 square in area are exerr pted from City wetland regulations. PAR TWO: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW In compliance with RCW 43.21C.240, the following project environmental review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. A. Environmental Impacts The Proposal was circulated and reviewed by various City Departments and Divisions to determine whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed development. Staff reviewers have identified that the proposal is likely to have the following probable impacts: 1. Earth Impacts: The site is relatively flat with less than 4 feet of elevation change across the site. The site elevation is presently 3 to 6 feet lower than SW 16th Street. The geotechnical report states that the parking area would be raised 2 to 4 feet and the proposed building 4 to 6 feet above existing grades. The preliminary grading plan estimates a total amount of fill equal to 7,625 cubic yards. There would be a total cut of 2,810 cubic yards, mostly related to excavation for the compensatory flood storage area in the northwest corner of the site (see discussion below). Therefore, the project is expected to require a net import of 4,815 cubic yards of fill material. A geotechnical report has been prepared for the application Earth Consultants, Inc. The critical geotechnical aspect of the planned development is primarily associated with foundation support of the building footings and slabs-on-grade. The report concludes that the proposed structure should be supported on pile foundations obtaining support in the dense to very dense sand and gravel that underlies the site at about 20 feet beneath the existing grades. The report includes recommendations for pile installation and load capacities. The geotechnical report also addresses site preparation, site drainage, excavations and slopes, pavement areas, slab-on-grade floors, etc. The site would be stripped of existing vegetation and graded for asphalt and building areas. Erosion could occur during the construction phase of the project. Potential erosion impacts would be mitigated by City Code requirements for approval of a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) and a Construction Mitigation Plan and prior to issuance of Construction Permits. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation is recommended. Nexus: NA SITERC2.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department ninistrative Site Plan Approval&Environme eview Committee Staff Report CANDLEWOC D SUITES HOTEL LUA-99-029, SA-A, ECF REPORT OF AF ZIL 13, 1999 Page 3 of 14 2) Water Impacts The applicant has identified a wetland in the northwest corner of the site. A wetlands report has been submitted by B & A Inc. The report describes the wetland as an excavated area that has been refilled, and therefore the wetland is occurring on top of fill material. The wetland is 1,850 square feet and is identified as a Category 3 wetland. Category 3 wetlands that are hydrologically isolated and are less than 5,000 square feet in area are exempt from City wetland requirements. In this case, impacts to the wetland would not require compensation and the required wetland buffers would not apply. Surface water flows presently sheetflow into the existing wetland and flows then exit the site to the north out of the wetland and into a constructed open drainage channel. The open channel conveys surface water flows from east to west and eventually flows into a large underground vault east of Oakesdale Avenue SW. Water is then pumped from the underground vault under Oakesdale Avenue SW and eventually released into the Springbrook Creek. The wetland on the site is considered hydrologically isolated because surface flows exit to a man-made drainage channel that flows to an underground vault before being pumped for release to Springbrook Creek. The proposal would not fill the existing wetland. Stormwater from the proposal would be treated and detained in a combined wet pond/detention pond facility and then released into the wetland before exiting the site. The wetland may be used in this manner because it is considered exempt from City wetland regulations. The developed conditions would release the same rate of flow at the same location as the pre-developed conditions. The stormwater facility will be required to meet the design standards of the King County Stormwater Design Manual as adopted by the City. Approximately one-half the site is located below the floodplain elevation of 16.58 feet. A portion of the site is going to be filled, raising the elevation above the current floodplain elevation. The applicant proposes to compensate for this loss of volume in the floodplain by an excavating the northwest part of the site outside of the wetland. Compensation for the loss of volume in the floodplain should be provided and demonstrated in the Drainage Report calculations. Mitigation Measures Compensation for the loss of volume in the floodplain shall be provided and demonstrated in Drainage Report calculations. The calculations and amount of storage provided shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division. Policy Nexus NA. 3) Fire Protection Impacts The proposal would add new construction to the City which would potentially impact the City's Fire Department. A Fire Mitigation Fee applies to all new construction. The required mitigation fee is based on a rate of $0.52 per square foot of new construction. For the proposed development the fee is estimated at $34,695.96 (66,723 square feet X $0.52 = $34,695.96). The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable at the time that Building Permits are issued. SITERC2.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department ministrative Site Plan Approval&EnvironmE eview Committee Staff Report CANDLEWOC D SUITES HOTEL LUA-99-029, SA-A, ECF REPORT OF AF RIL 13, 1999 Page 4 of 14 Mitigation Measures The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of $0.52 per square foot of new construction. This fee is estimated at $38,228.32. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Policy Nexus Fire Mitigation Fee Resolution and adopting Ordinance, SEPA Ordinance. 4) Transportation Impacts Access to the hotel is proposed from a single driveway off SW 16th Street. The driveway has separate 20 foot wide ingress and egress approaches with a landscape median between the driveways. The proposal would result in an increase in traffic trips and therefore would be subject to the City's Transportation Mitigation Fee. The Transportation Mitigation Fee is calculated to be $75 per each average daily trip attributable to the project. City staff estimates the number of traffic trips based upon the ITE Manual. For the hotel a daily rate of 6.24 trips per occupied room, assuming 80% occupancy, was used. This equals a total of 663.94 average daily trips for a traffic mitigation fee of $49,795.50. A traffic study for the proposal has been prepared by David Hamlin & Associates suggesting lower traffic generation numbers. Staff maintains that using the rates specified in the ITE Manual is the most consistent and accurate method for determining traffic generation numbers. The applicant has submitted a Construction Mitigation Plan which describes hauling and transportation routes to the site. The Construction Mitigation Plan states that construction would be performed between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. In order to limit the impact of trucking activities during peak traffic periods, truck hauling hours are limited to between 8:30 a.m. and 3:30 p.m. under the Development Guidelines Ordinance. Mitigation Measures The applicant shall be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of $75 for each average daily trip associated with the project. The Traffic Mitigation Fee is estimated at $49,795.50. This fee is payable prior to issuance of Building Permits. Policy Nexus: Environmental Ordinance, Transportation Mitigation Fee Ordinance 5) Land and Shoreline Use Impacts: The City Council approved rezoning the site from Medium Industrial (IM) to Commercial Office (CO) in January 1999. The proposed hotel use is permitted as a secondary use in the CO zone, subject to the condition that the hotel use is also located within the Employment Area-Valley (EAV) Comprehensive Plan designation, which applies to the subject proposal. The subject site is surrounded by Medium Industrial zoned properties and properties are mostly developed with warehouse/distribution uses. The proposed use is not expected to have an adverse impact on existing uses in the vicinity. Mitigation Measures No further mitigation is recommended. Policy Nexus NA. SITERC2 DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department ministrative Site Plan Approval&EnvironmE 'eview Committee Staff Report CANDLEWOCD SUITES HOTEL LUA-99-029, SA-A, ECF REPORT OF AF RIL 13, 1999 Page 5 of 14 B. Recommendation Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommend that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINATION OF DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE NON- SIGNIFICANCE- MITIGATED. X Issue DNS-M with 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period followed by a 14 day Appeal Period. C. Mitigation Measures 1. Compensation for the loss of volume in the floodplain shall be provided and demonstrated in Drainage Report calculations. The calculations and amount of storage provided shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division. 2. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of $0.52 per square foot of new construction. This fee is estimated at $38,228.32. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 3. The applicant shall be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of $75 for each average daily trip associated with the project. The Traffic Mitigation Fee is estimated at $49,795.50. This fee is payable prior to issuance of Building Permits. SITERC2.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department 'ministrative Site Plan Approval&Environmi 'eview Committee Staff Report CANDLEWOC D SUITES HOTEL LUA-99-029, SA-A, ECF REPORT OF AF?IL 13, 1999 Page 6 of 14 Advisory liotes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not sur)ject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. BUILDING Follow reccmmendations of soils report. Use current code 1997 UBC. FIRE 1. The preliminary fire flow is 3000 GPM, which requires one hydrant within 150 feet of the building and two additional hydrants within 300 feet of the building. A looped fire main is required by City Ordinance. 2. Separate plans and permits are required for the sprinkler, fire alarm, and standpipe systems. 3. Provide a list of any flammable, combustible liquids or hazardous chemicals that are to be used or stored en site. PLAN REVIEW Water 1. The Water System Development Connection Charge is $0.113 per gross square foot of site area, but not less than $850. 2. A vertic it profile will be required showing the water system. 3. The project is located on the NE 24-23-4 quarter section map. 4. Construction plans to meet City of Renton Standards. Storm/Surface Water 1. The Stoi m System Development Connection Charge is $6,293.55. 2. Construction plans to use NAVD 1988 datum for elevations. 3. Drawings to meet City of Renton drafting standards. 4. Runoff collected from pavement surface with vehicle access/parking must flow through an oil/water separator or adequate biofiltration system. 5. Site drai rage construction plans and erosion/sedimentation control plans are to meet the 1990 King County :.urface Water Design Manual requirements. 6. If the prc posed rockeries on the east property line are within 15 feet of the building, it will require a Building Permit. This is to be noted on the Civil Construction plans. Wastewater 1. The Sewer System Development Connection Charge is $0.078 per gross square feet, but not less than $850. 2. If the pro ect produce fats, oil, or grease, then an appropriate removal system will be required per plumbinc code. 3. Side sewer line to have a 2% slope to property line. 4. Construc ion drawing size is 22 X 34. 5. Provide f oor elevation on construction plans. Transportatior 1. New 5 fo )t wide sidewalks are required along SW 16th Street. 2. A minim m of a 5 foot wide planter strip is required between the curb and sidewalk. 3. Back edge of the sidewalk needs to be in a sidewalk easement. SITERC2.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department ministrative Site Plan Approval&Environm 'eview Committee Staff Report CANDLEWOOD SUITES HOTEL LUA-99-029, SA-A, ECF REPORT OF AF RIL 13, 1999 Page 7 of 14 AIRPORT The propos(d construction is situated within the 179 foot maximum elevation area surrounding the airport. PLANNING 1. Garbage and recyclable deposit areas and collection points shall be easily and safely accessible to hauling I rucks. 2. Sign cod standards for freestanding signs are based on ratio of 1 1/2 square feet of sign area per lineal foot of frontage along a public right-of-way. The subject site does not have frontage along SW 19th Street and therefore may not meet standards for signage and may have to share signage with the proposed hotel south of the site. PARKS All landscaping outside of property lines is to be maintained by the owner. The trail on SW 16th Street needs to be retained and connections made as required. SITERC2.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department fministrative Site Plan Approval&Environmi ?eview Committee Staff Report CANDLEWOCD SUITES HOTEL LUA-99-029, SA-A, ECF REPORT OF AF RIL 13, 1999 Page 8 of 14 PART THREE: ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION - REPORT & DECISION This decisio i on the administrative land use action is made concurrently with the environmental determination. A. Type of Land Use Action x Site Plan Review Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Conditional Use Binding Site Plan Special Permit for Grade & Fill Administrative Code Determination B. Exhi bits The f.)llowing exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing: application, proof of posting and publication, environmental review and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No. 2: Drawing No. 1, Site Plan, Context Site Plan, (Received July 15, 1997). Exhibit No. 3: Drawing No. 2, Site Plan, (Received July 10, 1998). Exhibit No. 4: Drawing No. 3, Landscape Plan (Received July 10, 1998). Exhibit No. 5: Drawing No. 4, First Floor Plan (Received July 10, 1998). Exhibit No. 6: Drawing No. 5, Typical Upper Floor Plan, (Received July 10, 1998). Exhib t No. 7: Drawing No. 6, Exterior Building Elevations and Finish Schedule, (Received July 10, 1998). Exhibit No. 8: Drawing No. 7, Exterior Building Elevations and Finish Schedule, (Received July 10, 1998). Exhibi': No. 9: Drawing No. 8, Cover Sheet, (Received July 10, 1998). Exhibi: No. 10: Drawing No. 9, Preliminary Grading and Storm Drainage Plan (Received July 10, 1998). Exhibi No. 11: Drawing No. 10, Preliminary Sanitary Sewer and Watermain Plan, (Received July 10, 1998). Exhibi. No. 12: Drawing No. 11, Watermain Details, (Received July 10, 1998). SITERC2.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department iministrative Site Plan Approval& Environm( zeview Committee Staff Report CANDLEWOCCD SUITES HOTEL LUA-99-029, SA-A, ECF REPORT OF AF RIL 13, 1999 Page 9 of 14 C. Consistency with Site Plan Criteria In re hewing the proposal with respect to the site Plan Approval Criteria set forth in Section 4-31 33(D) of the Site Plan Ordinance, the following issues have been identified by City Departmental Reviewers and Divisional Reviewers: 1. GENERAL CRITERIA: A. CONFORMANCE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, ITS ELEMENTS AND POLICIES; The subject site is located within the Employment Area-Valley (EAV) designation of the Comprehensive Plan. The EAV designation is intended to provide for a mixture of commercial, office, and industrial uses. The proposed hotel use falls within the range of uses anticipated for the designation. The iotel use is consistent with the following applicable EAV policies which encourage flexibility in allowing a variety of compatible uses to develop as secondary supporting uses to the primary office and industrial uses of the EAV. Obje:Live LU-EE.b: Provide flexibility in the regulatory processes by allowing for a variety of zoo le designations in the Employment Area-Valley designation. Policy LU-212.1 Develop the Renton Valley and the Black River Valley areas as a place for a ange and variety of commercial, office, and industrial uses. Policy LU-212.10 Commercial uses should be encouraged as secondary uses in industrial and c ffice designations. Policy LU-212.2 Compatible and related land uses should be encouraged to locate in proximity to one another. The site plan for the hotel proposal incorporates a number of elements which are consistent with the EAV Comprehensive Plan policies listed below. Policy LU-212.6 Developments should be encouraged to achieve greater efficiency in site utilization and result in benefits to users with techniques including: a. shared facilities such as parking and site access, recreation facilities and amenities; b. an mproved ability to serve development with transit by centralizing transit stops; and c. an opportunity to provide support services (e.g. copy center, coffee shop or lunch faciliti,?s, express mail services) for nearby development that otherwise might not exist. Policy LU-212.21 Vehicular connections between adjacent parking areas are encouraged. lncen Ives should be offered to encourage shared parking. Policy LU-212.19 Street trees and landscaping should be required for new development within the Valley to provide an attractive streetscape in areas subjected to a transition of land uses. Policy LU-212.20 When more intensive new uses are proposed for locations in close proximity to less intensive existing uses, the responsibility for mitigating any adverse impac,s should be the responsibility of the new use. Policy LU-291. Beautification and screening of parking lots should be encouraged through appropriate landscaping, fencing and berms. (Community Design policies) SITERC2.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department lministrative Site Plan Approval& Environmi ?eview Committee Staff Report CANDLEWOC D SUITES HOTEL LUA-99-029, SA-A, ECF REPORT OF AF'IL 13, 1999 Page 10 of 14 B. CONFORMANCE WITH EXISTING LAND USE REGULATIONS; The subject site is zoned Commercial Office (CO). Hotels are allowed as a secondary use in the CO zone, subject to the condition that the site location be within the Employment Ares-Valley (EAV) Comprehensive Plan designation. The proposal site complies with this secc ndary use condition. The hotel site plan proposal complies with all the development standards of the CO zone. The buildings is setback approximately 38 feet from SW 16th Street. No interior or side yard; are required in the CO zone. The maximum proposed building height of approximately 49 feet, 6 inches meets the CO zon€ height limit of 250 feet. Building coverage is less than the 65% maximum standard. The subject site is within the Green River Valley Planning area. An environmental mitic ation agreement between the City and the Soil Conservation Service (SCS) requires that 2% of a site area be provided as a natural landscape area for wildlife habitat. The subj act proposal includes a natural landscape area surrounding the stormwater detention facil ty and flood storage pond. The proximity to a water source is an appropriate location fort-abitat plantings. The applicant proposes 2,674 square feet of parking lot landscaping, equal to 5% of the parking lot area, which meets the 5% standard required by code. A pedestrian connection is provided to the hotel entry from the sidewalk along SW 16th Street. The Parking and Loading Ordinance requires 1 parking space per guest room and 2 parking spaces per each 3 employees. The hotel proposal includes a total of 141 parking spaces for the 133 guest rooms. Thus, 7 parking spaces are included for the employees. 22°ki of the total number are proposed as compact stalls. The Parking Code allows a maximum of 30%. The parking stalls meet the dimension requirements of the code. C. MITIGATION OF IMPACTS TO SURROUNDING PROPERTIES AND USES; The hotel proposal would not result in adverse impacts to surrounding properties or uses. Surrounding properties are mostly developed with medium industrial warehouse/distribution uses. Interstate 405 abuts the subject property on the north. The surrounding industrial uses and the interstate highway would impact the subject site with traffic and noise impacts, potentially disturbing guests. However, the zoning on the site was changed to Commercial Office allowing for the hotel use, the EAV Comprehensive Plan designation encourages a mix of commercial and industrial uses in the Valley, and the potential noise impacts are obvious to the applicant who is making the investment decision. The proposal includes landscaping around the perimeters of the property. There is a new rock wall indicated on the east property boundary. The wall would be approximately 3 to 3 1/2 bet high with a fence at the top. There is landscaping between the bottom of the wall and the property line at the north end of the site, but then the wall tapers and there is not adequate area to provide landscaping adjacent to the south property line. The applicant should increase the landscape area at the base or top of the wall to provide screening of the Nall and development from the adjacent property. The operation of the hotel is not expected to create impacts on surrounding uses. SITERC2.DOC City of Renton F/B/PW Department fministrative Site Plan Approval&Environm ?eview Committee Staff Report CANDLEWOOL'SUITES HOTEL LUA-99-029, SA-A, ECF REPORT OF APR L 13, 1999 Page 11 of 14 D. MITIGATION OF IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN TO THE SITE; The site would be mostly cleared of vegetation, except the existing wetland is shown as outside of the clearing area. Construction activities related to the proposed development would be required to utilize best management practices which would reduce potential construction impacts on the site. Apprcximately one-half the site is located below the floodplain elevation of 16.58 feet. A portion of the site is going to be filled, raising the elevation above the current floodplain elevation. The applicant is proposing to compensate for the loss of volume in the floodplain by an excavating the northwest part of the site outside of the wetland to pride for compensatory storage. Requ red utility improvements, including the stormwater drainage system would be designed to mitigate the potential impacts of the hotel development on the site. Therefore, the construction and operation of the proposed hotel development is not anticipated to adver sely impact the subject site. E. CONSERVATION OF AREA-WIDE PROPERTY VALUES; The proposed hotel development is anticipated to raise or conserve the property values in the vi :inity of the site. F. SAFETY AND EFFICIENCY OF VEHICLE AND PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION; Access to the hotel is proposed from a single driveway off SW 16th Street. The driveway has separate 20 foot wide ingress and egress approaches with a landscape median between the driveways. The Fire Department has approved the access. Adequate pedestrian circulation is provided with a sidewalk connection to SW 16th Street and continuing around the entire building. G. PROVISION OF ADEQUATE LIGHT AND AIR; The p roposed hotel buildings are sufficiently setback from property boundaries and existing buildings to allow for adequate light and air circulation to the building. H. MITIGATION OF NOISE, ODORS AND OTHER HARMFUL OR UNHEALTHY CONDITIONS; The c peration of the proposed hotel use is not expected to create any harmful or unhealthy condi ions. Noise, dust, and odors which may result from construction of the project would be mitigated through measures described in the Construction Mitigation Plan and with best mana Bement practices. 1. AVAILABILITY OF PUBLIC SERVICES AND FACILITIES TO ACCOMMODATE THE PROPOSED USE; AND The project site is adequately served by utilities and roads necessary to accommodate the propc sed hotel use. The hotel applicant will be responsible for extension of utilities on-site SITERC2.DOC City of Renton F/B/PW Department iministrative Site Plan Approval&Environmi 2eview Committee Staff Report CANDLEWOOL l SUITES HOTEL LUA-99-029, SA-A, ECF REPORT OF APF 13, 1999 Page 12 of 14 to ser ve the building. See the Advisory Notes section of this report for detailed information concE rning utilities and public services. J. PREVENTION OF NEIGHBORHOOD DETERIORATION AND BLIGHT. The r roposal would serve to prevent neighborhood deterioration and blight by improving a vacar t site with a hotel use that would support existing and anticipated office and industrial users in the area. The peak hours of operation for a hotel are in the evening, and the presence of evening activity may assist in preventing neighborhood deterioration. X Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. D. Findings, Conclusions & Decision Havir g reviewed the written record in the matter, the City now enters the following: 1) Request: The applicant has requested Environmental Review and Site Plan Approval for development of the Candlewood Suites Hotel. 2) Environmental Review: The applicant's file containing the application, State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation, the comments from various City depa ttments, the public notices requesting citizen comment, and other pertinent docu nents was entered as Exhibit No. 1. 3) Site Plan Review: The applicant's site plan application complies with the requi•ements for information for site plan review. The applicant's site plan and other proje:t drawings are entered as Exhibits No. 2 thru 12. 4) Comprehensive Plan: The subject proposal is consistent with the Corn )rehensive Plan designation of Employment Area Valley (EAV). 5) Zoning: The site plan as presented complies with the zoning requirements and development standards of the Commercial Office Zoning designation. 6) Existing Land Use: Land uses surrounding the subject site include: North: Inten.tate 405; East: Office, Light Industrial; South: Industrial Warehouse/; and West: Light Industrial Park.. SITERC2.DOC City of Renton f'/B/PW Department Iministrative Site Plan Approval&Environtm eview Committee Staff Report CANDLEWOOL)SUITES HOTEL LUA-99-029, SA-A, ECF REPORT OF APF IL 13. 1999 Page 13 of 14 E. Conclusions 1) The subject proposal complies with the policies and codes of the City of Renton. 2) The proposal complies with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Employment Area - Valley (EAV); and the Zoning designation of Commercial Office (CO). 3) Specific Land Use (e.g. Site Plan Approval) issues were raised by various City departments. These issues are addressed in the body of this report. F. Decision The Site Plan for Candlewood Suites Hotel, File No. LUA-99-029, SA-A, ECF, is appr wed subject to the following conditions. 1. The applicant shall provide additional landscaping at the base or top of the rockery wall along the east property boundary, in order to screen the wall and/or development from the adjacent property. A revised landscape plan shall be subject to the approval of the C evelopment Services Division. EFFECTIVE DATE OF DECISION ON LAND USE ACTION: SIGNATURES: �J a Hanson, Zoning Administrator date TRANSMIT?ED this 14th day of April, 1999 to the applicant and owner: Candlewood Hotel Company, Inc. c/o Weis Bui ders, Inc. Attn: Jeff Melby 8009 34th A\enue South Minneapolis, MN. 55425 Susan McLeod, Stuart Ness, Steven Ness 6645 North E nsign Portland, OF. 97217 SITERC2.DOC City of Renton f'/B/PW Department iministrative Site Plan Approval&Environm, review Committee Staff Report CANDLEWOOL'SUITES HOTEL LUA-99-029, SA-A, ECF REPORT OF APF Q 13, 1999 Page 14 of 14 TRANSMITTED this 14th day of April, 1999 to the following: Larry Mecklinc , Building Official C. Duffy, Fire '9revention Neil Watts, Pr blic Works Division Lawrence J. V/arren, City Attorney South County Journal Environme ital Determination and Land Use Decision Appeal Process Appeals of either the environment it determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM May 3, 1999 (14 days from the date of publication). If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. SITERC2.DOC a CITY IF RENTON ..LL Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator April 15, 1999 Mr. Bruce Creager Barghausen Consulting Engineers 18215—72nd Avenue South Kent, WA 98032 SUBJECT: Candlewood Suites Hotel Project No. LUA-99-029,SA-A,ECF Dear Mr. Creager: This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) and is to advise you that they have completed their review of the subject project. The ERC, on April 13, 1999, issued a threshold Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated with Mitigation Measures. See the enclosed Mitigation Measures document. Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM May 3, 1999 (14 days from the date of publication). If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. The preceding information will assist you in planning for implementation of your project and enable you to exercise your appeal rights more fully, if you choose to do so. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at (425) 430- . For the Environmental Review Committee, Peter Rosen Project Manager cc: Property Owners Candlewood Hotel Company, Inc. Enclosure DNSMLTR 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES AND CONDITIONS APPLI:,ATION NO(S): LUA-99-029,SA-A,ECF APPLE ANT: Candlewood Hotel Company PROJ ECT NAME: Candelwood Suites Hotel DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construct a 133 unit hotel; a four-story structure with a max mum building height of 49 feet, 6 inches, and a total building area of 66,723 square feet. Access is proposed off SW 16th Street and there are 141 parking spaces on the site. There is a 1,850 sq. ft. Categ)ry 3 wetland in the northwest corner of the site. Category 3 wetlands which are hydrologically isolatE d and are less than 5,000 square in area are exempted from City wetland regulations. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 900 SW 16th Street MITIE ATION MEASURES: 1. Compensation for the loss of volume in the floodplain shall be provided and demonstrated in Drainage Report calculations. The calculations and amount of storage provided shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division. 2. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of $0.52 per square foot of new construction. This fee is estimated at $38,228.32. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 3. The applicant shall be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of $75 for each average daily trip associated with the project. The Traffic Mitigation Fee is estimated at $49,795.50. This fee is payable prior to issuance of Building Permits. The Site Plan for Candlewood Suites Hotel, File No. LUA-99-029, SA-A, ECF, is approved subject to the following conditions. Condition: 1. The applicant shall provide additional landscaping at the base or top of the rockery wall along the east property boundary, in order to screen the wall and/or development from the adjacent property. A revised landscape plan shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division. CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-99-029,SA-A,ECF APPLICANT: Candlewood Hotel Company PROJECT NAME: Candlewood Suites Hotel DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construct a 133 unit hotel; a four-story structure with a maximum building height of 49 feet, 6 inches, and a total building area of 66,723 square feet. Access is prorosed off SW 16th Street and there are 141 parking spaces on the site. There is a 1,850 sq. ft. Category 3 wetland in the northwest corner of the site. Category 3 wetlands which are hydrologically isolated and are less than 5,000 square in area are exempted from City wetland regulations. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 900 SW 16th Street AdvL ory Notes to Applicant: The f allowing notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they,ire not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. BUILDING Follow recommendations of soils report. Use current code 1997 UBC. FIRE 1. The preliminary fire flow is 3000 GPM, which requires one hydrant within 150 feet of the building and two additional hydrants within 300 feet of the building. A looped fire main is required by City Ordinance. 2. Separate plans and permits are required for the sprinkler, fire alarm, and standpipe systems. 3. Provide a list of any flammable, combustible liquids or hazardous chemicals that are to be used or stored on site. PLAN REVIEW Wate 1. The Water System Development Connection Charge is $0.113 per gross square foot of site area, but not less than $850. 2. A vertical profile will be required showing the water system. 3. The project is located on the NE 24-23-4 quarter section map. 4. Construction plans to meet City of Renton Standards. Storm/Surface Water 1. -'-he Storm System Development Connection Charge is $6,293.55. 2. Construction plans to use NAVD 1988 datum for elevations. 3. Drawings to meet City of Renton drafting standards. Candlev.ood Suites Hotel LUA-9c-029,SA-A,ECF Advisory Notes(Continued) Page 2 of 2 4. Runoff collected from pavement surface with vehicle access/parking must flow through an oil/water separator or adequate biofiltration system. 5. Site drainage construction plans and erosion/sedimentation control plans are to meet the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual requirements. 6. If the proposed rockeries on the east property line are within 15 feet of the building, it will require a Building Permit. This is to be noted on the Civil Construction plans. Waste vater 1. TI ie Sewer System Development Connection Charge is$0.078 per gross square feet, but not less than $850. 2. If the project produce fats, oil, or grease, then an appropriate removal system will be required per plumbing code. 3. Side sewer line to have a 2% slope to property line. 4. Construction drawing size is 22 X 34. 5. Provide floor elevation on construction plans. Transportation 1. New 5 foot wide sidewalks are required along SW 16th Street. 2. A minimum of a 5 foot wide planter strip is required between the curb and sidewalk. 3. E ack edge of the sidewalk needs to be in a sidewalk easement. AIRPORT The p.oposed construction is situated within the 179 foot maximum elevation area surrounding the airpor . PLAN\JING 1. Gubage and recyclable deposit areas and collection points shall be easily and safely accessible to hauling trucks. 2. Sign code standards for freestanding signs are based on ratio of 1 1/2 square feet of sign area per lineal foot of frontage along a public right-of-way. The subject site does not have frontage along SA/ 19th Street and therefore may not meet standards for signage and may have to share signage with the proposed hotel south of the site. PARKS All landscaping outside of property lines is to be maintained by the owner. The trail on SW 16th Street needs to be retained and connections made as required. CITY OF:RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION • AFFIDAVIT OF.SERVICE BY MAILING • On the 11_1') day of Opv1L , 1999, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope contairn g e d,f5-ternn‘ atiis documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing Department of Ecology Don Hurter WSDOT KC Wastewater Treatment Division Larry Fisher Washington Department of Fisheries David F. Dietzman Department of Natural Resources Shirley Lukhang Seattle Public Utilities Duwamish Indian Tribe Rod Malcom Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Joe Jainga Puget Sound Energy (Signature of Sender) Sal STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS COUNTY OF KING I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that }.,ed,iLn, S signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for tfrd uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: /a., j 5°i 5 J AV_ e Nola ublic' and for the State of Wash t n Notary(Print) My appointor COMMISSION EXPIRES 6/29/99 Project Name: keu3ocd Suck-es Project Number: ► k)A . `l ) . 514 -IA NOTARY.DOC 4. CITY _ F RENTON .. Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator April 15, 1999 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Subject: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on April 15, 1999: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED CANDLEWOOD SUITES HOTEL LUA-99-029,SA-A,ECF Proposal to construct a 133 unit hotel; a four-story structure with a maximum building height of 49 feet, 6 inches, and a total building area of 66,723 square feet. Access is proposed off SW 16th Street and there are 141 parking spaces on the site. There is a 1,850 sq. ft. Category 3 wetland in the northwest corner of the site. Category 3 wetlands which are hydrologically isolated and are less than 5,000 square in area are exempted from City wetland regulations. Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3),WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM May 3, 1999 (14 days from the date of publication). If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. If you have questions, please call me at (425)430-7219. For the Environmental Review Committee, Peter Rosen Project Manager cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division Larry Fisher, Department of Fisheries David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources Don Hurter, Department of Transportation Shirley Lukhang, Seattle Public Utilities Duwamish Tribal Office Rod Malcom, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (Ordinance) Joe Jainga, Puget Sound Energy AGNCYLTR\ 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-99-029,SA-A,ECF APPLICANT: Candlewood Hotel Company PROJECT NAM Candelwood Suites Hotel DESCRIPTION JF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construct a 133 unit hotel; a four-story structure with a maximum building height of 49 feet, 6 inches, and a total building area of 66,723 square feet. Access is proposed off SW 16th Street and there are 14'1 parking spaces on the site. There is a 1,850 sq. ft. Category 3 wetland in the northwest corner of the site. Category 3 wetlands which are hydrologically isolated and are less than 5,000 square in area are exempted from City wetland regulations. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 900 SW 16th Street LEAD AGENCY City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Re iton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impac on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. Appeals of eitf er the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM May 3, 1999 (14 days from the date of publication). If no appeals are files I by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner ai e governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: April 19, 1999 DATE OF DEC SION: April 13, 1999 SIGNATURES: 294 P94 �, �,��jj DTEmerin �Admrnlstrator Gregg99 Department of-Planning/Building/Public Works \ ,(A.,,,, 1� ?G 4 `l 3 7,7 Jim Shepherd, Administrator DATE Community Services Lee eler, Fire Chief DATE Renton Fire DE partment DNSMSIG.DOC CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES AND CONDITIONS APPLIC4TION NO(S): LUA-99-029,SA-A,ECF APPLIC 4NT: Candlewood Hotel Company PROJECT NAME: Candelwood Suites Hotel DESCR PTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construct a 133 unit hotel; a four-story structure with a maxir ium building height of 49 feet, 6 inches, and a total building area of 66,723 square feet. Access is propcsed off SW 16th Street and there are 141 parking spaces on the site. There is a 1,850 sq. ft. Categorrj 3 wetland in the northwest corner of the site. Category 3 wetlands which are hydrologically isolated and are less than 5,000 square in area are exempted from City wetland regulations. LOCAT ON OF PROPOSAL: 900 SW 16th Street MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. Compensation for the loss of volume in the floodplain shall be provided and demonstrated in Drainage Report calculations. The calculations and amount of storage provided shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division. 2. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of $0.52 per square foot of new construction. This fee is estimated at $38,228.32. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 3. The applicant shall be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of $75 for each average daily trip associated with the project. The Traffic Mitigation Fee is estimated at $49,795.50. This fee is payable prior to issuance of Building Permits. The Site Plan for Candlewood Suites Hotel, File No. LUA-99-029, SA-A, ECF, is approved subject to the following conditions. Condition: 1. The applicant shall provide a minimum landscape width of 5 feet along the east rock wall in order to screen the wall and development from the adjacent property. A revised landscape plan shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division. CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-99-029,SA-A,ECF APPLIC ANT: Candlewood Hotel Company PROJE:,T NAME: Candlewood Suites Hotel DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construct a 133 unit hotel; a four-story structure with a maximum building height of 49 feet, 6 inches, and a total building area of 66,723 square feet. Access is proposed off SW 16th Street and there are 141 parking spaces on the site. There is a 1,850 sq. ft. Catego y 3 wetland in the northwest corner of the site. Category 3 wetlands which are hydrologically isolatec and are less than 5,000 square in area are exempted from City wetland regulations. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 900 SW 16th Street Advise)ry Notes to Applicant: The fc llowing notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the envirc nmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. BUILC ING Follovi, recommendations of soils report. Use current code 1997 UBC. FIRE 1. TI ie preliminary fire flow is 3000 GPM, which requires one hydrant within 150 feet of the building and two additional hydrants within 300 feet of the building. A looped fire main is required by City 0-dinance. 2. S;parate plans and permits are required for the sprinkler, fire alarm, and standpipe systems. 3. P-ovide a list of any flammable, combustible liquids or hazardous chemicals that are to be used or stored on site. PLAN REVIEW Water 1. Tie Water System Development Connection Charge is $0.113 per gross square foot of site area, bit not less than $850. 2. P vertical profile will be required showing the water system. 3. The project is located on the NE 24-23-4 quarter section map. 4. C onstruction plans to meet City of Renton Standards. Storm/Surface Water 1. The Storm System Development Connection Charge is $6,293.55. 2. Construction plans to use NAVD 1988 datum for elevations. 3. Drawings to meet City of Renton drafting standards. Candlew xod Suites Hotel • LUA-99-029,SA-A,ECF Advisor) Notes(Continued) Page 2of2 4. Runoff collected from pavement surface with vehicle access/parking must flow through an oil/water separator or adequate biofiltration system. 5. Site drainage construction plans and erosion/sedimentation control plans are to meet the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual requirements. 6. If the proposed rockeries on the east property line are within 15 feet of the building, it will require a Building Permit. This is to be noted on the Civil Construction plans. Wastevrater 1. The Sewer System Development Connection Charge is $0.078 per gross square feet, but not less than $850. 2. If I he project produce fats, oil, or grease, then an appropriate removal system will be required per plumbing code. 3. Si le sewer line to have a 2% slope to property line. 4. Construction drawing size is 22 X 34. 5. Provide floor elevation on construction plans. Transportation 1. New 5 foot wide sidewalks are required along SW 16th Street. 2. A minimum of a 5 foot wide planter strip is required between the curb and sidewalk. 3. Rick edge of the sidewalk needs to be in a sidewalk easement. AIRPC RT The pr vosed construction is situated within the 179 foot maximum elevation area surrounding the airport PLANNING 1. Ga tage and recyclable deposit areas and collection points shall be easily and safely accessible to hailing trucks. 2. Sic n code standards for freestanding signs are based on ratio of 1 1/2 square feet of sign area per lineal foot of frontage along a public right-of-way. The subject site does not have frontage along S1 V 19th Street and therefore may not meet standards for signage and may have to share signage wi h the proposed hotel south of the site. PARKS All lac idscaping outside of property lines is to be maintained by the owner. The trail on SW 16th Street needs to be retained and connections made as required. N.O'fiCE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION CANDLEWOOD SUITES HOTEL LUA-99-029,SA-A,ECF Proposal to construct a 133 unit hotel;a lour-story structure with a maximum building height of 49 feet,6 Inches,and a total building area of 66,723 square feet.Access Is proposed off SW 16th Street and there are 141 parking spaces on the site.There is a 1.850 sq.8.Category 3 wetland In the northwest corner of the site. Category 3 wetlands which are hydrologically Isolated and are less than 5,000 square in area are exempted from City wetland regulations. Location;900 SW 16"Sheet. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Aland use decision mr u be filed environmental writing onnorlon beforoC6 00 PM May53,1999.CIf no appeals are Sled br y this date,both actions will become final.Appeals must be filed in writing(ogether with the required S75.00 application fee with:Hearing Examiner,City of Renton,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Sechon 4-8-118.Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office,(425)-430-6510. • I • G1rOtEW00D SlaiEe N WTQ + err' 10 �.r P •r • nttliilY�;.- Cg . try,�If : • ��qj Rn \\ .. it I Ir FOR FURTHER INFORMATION,PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON,DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT(425)430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file Identification. CERTIFICATION , hereby certify that _a copies of the above document were posted by me in conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on , i 1 Igct 49 • Signed: 24, ATTEST: Subcribed and sworn before me, a Nortary Public, in for the State of Washington residing in -Kr(2...,,v( ,on the I Z day of /le/9 , 7Z)1 kot„._„,„ atAltz MARILYN KAMCHEFF EXPi„ 3 G/29/99 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Charlotte Ann Kassens first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of the SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL 600 S. Washington Avenue, Kent, Washington 98032 a daily newspaper published seven (7)times a week. Said newspaper is a legal NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL newspaper of general publication and is now and has been for more than six months DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE prior to the date of publication, referred to, printed and published in the English language RENTON,WASHINGTON continually as a daily newspaper in Kent, King County, Washington. The South County The Environmental Review Committee Non- Journal has been approved as a legal newspaper byorder of the Superior Court of the (ERC) has issued a Determinationdforthe o pp g p Significance - Mitigated for following State of Washington for King County. project under the authority of the Renton The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the South County Municipal Code. CANDLEWOOD SUITES HOTEL Journal (and not in supplemental form) which was regularly distributed to the subscribers LUA-99-029.SA-A.ECF during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a Proposal to construct a 133 unit hotel. Location: 900 SW 16th St. Appeals of either the environmental Candlewood Suites Hotel determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3). WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 as published on: 4/19/99 PM May 3, 1999. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of$40.25, Appeal se th e must be filed in writing together e required $75.00 application fee charged to Acct. No. 8051067A - with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA Legal Number 5977 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are gov- erned y4- by City of Renton MunicipalnorCode Section 4 8 11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be Legal Cler , t Jouma obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office,(425)-430-6510. Published in the South County Journal April 19, 1999.5977 Subscribed and sworn before me n is day of , 19 C7/p `oltut if iti oi . 0� Ss 0 (f/ b 79•��,i Notary Public of the State of Washington .C., N07Agr �►: residing in Renton _ King County, Washington sj •— i 9 Ot '''�%�WASN.40O. �hIIm n t ttt►�� NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Em"ironmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigat€d for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. CANDLEWOOD SUITES HOTEL LUA-99-029,SA-A,ECF Proposal to construct a 133 unit hotel. Location: 900 SW 16th St. Appeal ; of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or the lanai use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM May 3, 1999. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. Publication Date: April 19, 1999 Accou it No. 51067 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works • ENVIROUMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 10ktc�. - COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 5, 1999 APPLICATION NC): LUA-99-029,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 22, 1999 APPLICANT: Car dlewood Hotel Company, Inc. PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen PROJECT TITLE: Candlewood Suites Hotel WORK ORDER NO: 78500 LOCATION: 900 SW 16th Street SITE AREA 2.9 icres l BUILDING AREA(new expansion gross): 66,722 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construct a 133 unit hotel; a four-story structure with a maximum building height of 49 feet, 6 inches, an a total building area of 66,723 square feet. Access is proposed off SW 16th Street and there are 141 parking spaces on the site. There is a 1,850 sq.ft. Category 3 wetland in the northwest corner of the site which would not be directly impacted by the p-oposal. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics — Water LighvGlare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation , Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RE LATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional inl wination is needed to properly assess this proposal. i Signature of Direct(r or Authorized Representative DEVAPP.DOC Date Rev 10193 • PROJECT LUA 99-029, SA-A, ECF Candlewood Suites Hotel City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/ Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET (Continuation) POLICE RELATED COMMENTS 34.49 Police Calls for Service Estimated Annually CONSTRUCTION PHASE To protect materials and equipment it is recommended that all materials and tools be locked up when not in use. The site will need security lighting and any construction trailer should be completely fenced in with portable chain-link fencing. The fence will provide both a physical and psychological barrier to any prospective thief and will demonstrate that this area is private property. Construction trailers should be kept locked when not in use, and should also have a heavy-duty deadbolt installed with no less then a 1-1/2"throw when bolted. Glass windows in the trailer should be shatter-resistant. I also recommend the business post the appropriate"No Trespassing" signs on the property while it's under construction(flier attached). This will aid police in making arrests on the property after hours if suspects are observed vandalizing or stealing building materials. The use of off-duty police officers or private security guards to patrol the site during the hours of darkness is also recommended. COMPLETED BUILDING Security lighting in the parking lot areas and around the building after it is completed is a necessity. The doors to each room should be accessed only by electronic keys (metal locks are easy to pry, which allows burglary of hotel guests.) Deadbolt locks and peepholes are needed on each guest room and in the office rooms in the business. Landscaping around the exterior of the building should not be too dense or high. It is important to allow visibility. Too much landscaping will give the building the look of a fortress and possibly give a burglary sufficient coverage to break into the facility, especially during the hours of darkness. • Page 1of1 • ... �� Trespass USINES Enforcement WATCH • Quite often, business owners and managers are faced with crimes that occur on the property after the businesses are closed and the employees have gone home. Some of the crimes that occur are burglary, vandalism, graffiti, trespassing, drug dealing and robbery in the parking lots. There is a way for police and business owners to discourage these types of crimes from taking place on private property, and that is by enforcing the City of Renton's Municipal Trespass Code 6-18-10. In order for police to be able to make an arrest for Trespass, business owners or managers need to purchase signs and display them in conspicuous areas on the property. These signs need to include the following language: 1. Indicate that the subject property is privately owned and; 2. Uninvited presence on the specified property is not permitted during the hours the business is closed, and; 3. Violators will be subject to criminal sanctions pursuant to Renton City Code 6-18-10. MOST IMPORTANTLY-THE SIGNS SHOULD BE CONSPICUOUS FROM ALL POSSIBLE POINTS OF ENTRY TO THE PROPERTY, AND ALSO BE PLACED ON THE EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDINGS. This way when a suspect is arrested, he/she will not be able to claim as a defense that he/she did not know he or she was trespassing. EXAMPLES FOR TRESPASS SIGNS: NO TRESPASSDIG NO TRESPASSLYG This is private property. Persons without specific No Trespassing after business hours business are not authorized to be on the premises between (insert specific times). Anyone on the the hours of(insert the hours your business is closed). premises after business hours is subject to Violators are subject to arrest and/or citation for criminal arrest and/or citation for Criminal Trespass pursuant to Renton City Code #6-18-10.. Trespass and/or impoundment of vehicle. Per Renton City Code #6-18-10. By enforcing the Trespass Ordinance, business owners and police will be sending a message to criminals that they are not allowed to conduct criminal activity on the property. In making arrests for Trespass, police may be preventing the more serious crimes from taking place. ti.CY r� COURTESY OF RENTON POLICE DEPARTMENT 4 CRIME PREVENTION UNIT -v 235 - 2571 r City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPAFTMENT: F`Ye PY, -ham COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 5, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-029,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 22, 1999 '—)tiI i=[4�2- ri 4:p'I-' APPLICANT: Candl3wood Hotel Company, Inc. PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen PROJECT TITLE: C andlewood Suites Hotel WORK ORDER NO: 78500 LOCATION: 900 SW 16th Street SITE AREA: 2.9 aces BUILDING AREA(pew expansion_gross):-66,722 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construct a 133 unit hotel; a four-story structure with a maximum building height of 49 feet, 6 inches, and total building area of 66,723 square feet. Access is proposed off SW 16th Street and there are 141 parking spaces on the site. There is a 1,850 sq.ft. Category 3 wetland in the northwest corner of the site which would not be directly impacted by the prc posal. A. ENVIRONME JTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major anon Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts ImpactsNecessary Housing Air Earth Aesthetics ' Water LightGlare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet � ) 14,000� Feet �p �_l ?IL fit D/ it rt�l f acJf /a/ ' B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS Cee_ (el,a Q_ We have revi ed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or area where additlo al,nformation is n e d to properly assess this proposal. /710 Signature Director or Authorized Re sentative Date DEVAPP. C (0( O vet • CITY OF RENTON iP s FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU MEMORANDUM DATE: March 23, 1999 TO: Peter Rosen, Planner FROM: Jim Gray, Assistant Fire Marshal 4- SUBJECT: Candlewood II Project, 900 SW 16 St. Fire Department Comments: 1. The preliminary Fire flow is 3000 GPM, which requires one fire hydrant within 150 feet of the building and two additional hydrants within 300 feet of the building. A looped fire main is required by City Ordinance. 2. Provide a list of any flammable, combustible liquids or hazardous chemicals that are to be used or stored on site. 3. A fire mitigation fee of$34,695.96 is required based on $.52 a square foot of building square footage. 4. Separate plans and permits are required for the fire alarm, sprinkler and standpipe systems. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: P $ - COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 5, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-029,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 22, 1999 APPLICANT: Canclewood Hotel Company, Inc. PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen PROJECT TITLE: Candlewood Suites Hotel WORK ORDER NO: 78500 LOCATION: 900 SW 16th Street SITE AREA: 2.9 a:res I BUILDING AREA(new expansion gross): 66,722 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PR DPOSAL: Proposal to construct a 133 unit hotel; a four-story structure with a maximum building height of 49 feet, 6 inches, and a total building area of 66,723 square feet. Access is proposed off SW 16th Street and there are 141 parking spaces on the site. There is a 1,850 sq.ft. Category 3 wetland in the northwest corner of the site which would not be directly impacted by the pr)posal. A. ENVIRONME NTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing . Air Aesthetics _ Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet (71/(_ ,2"0‘ " ye-- -7t ii7z4 B. POLICY-R,_LATED COMMENTS �/ ái' a5C i E5,t /`2 %72 avvlik j "/V /z /77a/nn(d �67/7-Zi - ',___ . w. / /Lee . .6-c- A% he.- 4--c , / G6-Yogri-ion,o- nticiak. ao r2erwiecr, C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS i? / 70 c%-1A-1 i 6 C( IC "6` 212' We have reviewE d this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additi al information is needed to properly assess this proposal. C. i/7___ --1. ----- . 3/;?5/77 Signature of Dire for or Authorized Representative Dat DEVAPP.DOC Rev 1:-? City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEP/RTMENT:etuAsiaorrtafiav) COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 5, 1999 APPLICATION NO LUA-99-029,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 22, 1999 APPLICANT: Candlewood Hotel Company, Inc. PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosew, PROJECT TITLE: Candlewood Suites Hotel WORK ORDER NO: 78500 t r O,� LOCATION: 900 .W 16th Street SITE AREA: 2.9 a rres BUILDING AREA(new expansion gross): 722 sq f. r2 . SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construct a 133 unit hotel; a four-story structure with a maximum building height of 49 feet, 6 inches, and a total building area of 66,723 square feet. Access is proposed off SW 16th Street and there ard41 parking spaces on the site. There is a 1,850 sq.ft. Category 3 wetland in the northwest corner of the site which would not b erectly impacted by the pr Dposal. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water LighVGlare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RE LATED COMMENTS • C.- t u J 2-C.- C;,`l �lC1)•t.i. .� Al +�.t� Ci7 C. CODE-REL ATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional imonrration is needed to properly assess this proposal. ( / ,; l i% • `17?�"� /,y`; Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev 10/93 . CANDLEWOOD II HOTEL 900 BLK. OF SW 16TH Street Environmental Review March 29, 1999 TRANSPORTATION: 1. The traffic mitigation fee is $75 per new trip generated. The trip rate is 6.24 per unit in the ITE Trip Generation Manual section (311). The estimated cost at 80% occupancy is $49,795.50. Estimated trips are 663.94. See attached Transportation Mitigation Sheet. 2. New 5-ft. sidewalks, required on SW 16th St. 3. A minimum of a 5-foot planter strip is required between the curb and sidewalk. 4. Back edge of the sidewalk would need to be in a side walk easement. 99cm02'T 99CM021T.DOC\ • O G n � • JP i♦r t./..,.-.rc r..a-^»•.Q>Avc..40"......ev••rw.:.:....-a•ilr..-x `^S..•a...••• •••..-.rn-,.;v'W r.TRA P :EAT t 1.IV':1\11 r .O Ltif F E Project Name -uod 1 e iVood Note I Project Address `WO S LA) 104 Si Contact Person 8✓uc4 Cvcatrt✓ Address Barr(lnuuoty Phone Number LIZS -Z5 ( - 6121 . Permit Number L.VA _qq _ Uzq Project Description 133 o'.t 14olci Land Use Type: Method of Calculation: J 54.17e Hotel (3/1) ❑ Residential ,' ITE Trip Generation Manual �J ❑ Retail 0 Traffic Study Day Iq R a Non-retail ❑ Other L,2.4 au . ✓oowi _SOoIo occu�lir�y ya44 Calculation: Nc-t Nea) daJ t,;►Ps - (133)(0.W) (6.24) h)63. �ary t�ys -- At $75 top - ( $75)( 63.614) _ $ 1497 ?5 . 5O • • Transportation Mitigation Fee: ' . "I R? • Sv' Calculated by: l v a Date: 3/2z/f/ Account Number: 105. 5Rq. 3180. 70. Oo. Date of Payment • City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:S"' 1"c-A W r ri..y. COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 5, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-029,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 22, 1999 APPLICANT: Candhwood Hotel Company, Inc. PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen ,e,), PROJECT TITLE: C andlewood Suites Hotel WORK ORDER NO: 7805500 OA. LOCATION: 900 S\i J 16th Street �.% '��O Lra , SITE AREA: 2.9 act es BUILDING AREA(new expandtgros5):? 6,722 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PRC POSAL: Proposal to construct a 133 unit hotel; a four-story structure with a max )�m buiiding height of 49 feet, 6 inches, and a total building area of 66,723 square feet. Access is proposed off SW 16th Street afSQ�there are 141 parking spaces on the site. there is a 1,850 sq.ft. Category 3 wetland in the northwest corner of the site which w 4dnot be directly impacted by the pro)osal. A. ENVIRONMEI ITAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics _ Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RE,_ATED COMMENTS -e--e- A't a cl 1 trti`)eJ ,A v' - 1/I ett3 Cot v, bti, --4--("s C. CODE-REL ATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP DOC Rev 10/93 CANDLEWOOD II HOTEL 900 BLK. OF SW 16TH Street Environmental Review March 30, 1999 Storm Drainage: 1. The Storm System Development Connection charge is $6,293.55. 2. Construction plans to use NAVD 1988 datum for elevations. 3. Construction plans to be prepare in accordance with the City of Renton drafting standards. 4. Runoff collected from the pavement surface with vehicle access/parking must flow through an oil/water separator or adequate biofiltration system. 5. Site drainage construction plans and erosion/sedimentation control plans are to meet the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual requirements. 6. If the proposed rookeries on the East property side is within 15-ft of the building it will come under the Building permit. This to be noted on the Civil Construction plans. 99cm021 D 99CM021D.DOC\ ' r CANDLEWOOD II HOTEL 900 BLK. OF SW 16TH Street Environmental Review March 25, 1999 SEWER: (Waste Water): 1. The Sewer System Development Connection charge is $0.078 per gross square feet, but not less than$850. 2. If the project produce fats, oils, or grease, then an appropriate removal system will be required per plumbing code . 3. Side sewer line to have a 2%slope to property line. 4. Construction drawing size is 22 x 34. 8. Provide floor elevation on construction plans.. 99cm021S Document31 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:f\' RgOkew_ W�Q.e" COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 5, 1999 APPLICATION NO: WA-99-029,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 22, 1999 APPLICANT: Candlo+wood Hotel Company, Inc. PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen r,fh, PROJECT TITLE: C andlewood Suites Hotel WORK ORDER NO: 78500 4cotir, LOCATION: 900 S'v 116th Street ,(:, SITE AREA: 2.9 act es I BUILDING AREA(new expansion gross): 66,722 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PRC POSAL: Proposal to construct a 133 unit hotel; a four-story structure with a maximum Oral tiplght of 49 feet, 6 inches, and a total building area of 66,723 square feet. Access is proposed off SW 16th Street and there are 141 paricing spaces on the site. There is a 1,850 sq.ft. Category 3 wetland in the northwest corner of the site which would not be directly impacted by the proposal. A. ENVIRONMEI ITAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics _ Water LighVGlare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RE'_ATED COMMENTS 2. CJ. c-3. ([ dCI-r Vri t;,vd. 71)v Yei/I z C'er-4-i7lr! •.` o C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional inform don is needed to properly assess this proposal. A f> (. e/le.27 �L�t-'77 `ems/ �/l Signature of Direc`or or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev '=b"s CANDLEWOOD II HOTEL 900 BLK. OF SW 16TH Street Environmental Review March 25, 1999 WATER: 1. There will be a System Development Connection charge for water is $0.113 per gross square foot of site area, but not less than$850. 2. One fire hydrant is required for each 1000 gpm of required fire flow. Preliminary fire flow is 3000 GPM per Fire Prevention Department. Therefore,three(3)fire hydrants would be required. 3. The primary hydrant is to be within 150-feet of the structures, but not closer than 50-feet. The secondary hydrants must be within 300-feet of the structures. 4. Drawings to adhere to City of Renton drafting standards available at the 6th floor counter. 5. A vertical profile will be required showing the water system. 6. If required fire flow is over 2500 gpm a water loop system is required. A loop system is required to be located in a 15-ft. Utility Easement. The final required fire flow will be determine by the Fire Prevention Department. 7. The project is located on the NE 24-23-4 quarter section map. 8. Construction drawings to meet City of Renton drafting standards. C:99cm021 W 99CM021W.DOC\ City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: CoAttuc o-IA iSeAkjic-e.A COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 5, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-029,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 22, 1999 APPLICANT: Candlewood Hotel Company, Inc. PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen \OA% PROJECT TITLE: Candlewood Suites Hotel WORK ORDER NO: 78500 % N9A. LOCATION: 900 SW 16th Street <Q4, ?? ^ O,I, SITE AREA: 2.9 acres I BUILDING AREA(new expansion gross):�bQ722 s* SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construct a 133 unit hotel; a four-story structure with a maximum buildi height of 49 feet, 6 inches, and a total building area of 66,723 square feet. Access is proposed off SW 16th Street and there are parking spaces on the site. There is a 1,850 sq.ft. Category 3 wetland in the northwest corner of the site which would not be ►ictly impacted by the proposal. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics _ Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities , Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS F(JG-L0 t-i/ 12 ( CO NI j"l — -4 TL a jS 6 F- S6 i .— S 1,1k7'66g-T � 2R +—'rt Cc) 0, Ve7 CI7 L-AEL . We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. e--(/ / 7 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev 10/93 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: e1.Vha mutt, OeLJ" `�"J ..�.y�. J JCOMMENTS DUE: APRIL 5, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-029,SA-A,ECF " DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 22, 1999 APPLICANT: Cand ewood Hotel Company, Inc. PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen PROJECT TITLE: :andlewood Suites Hotel WORK ORDER NO: 78500 LOCATION: 900 SN 16th Street SITE AREA: 2.9 al res 1 BUILDING AREA(new expansion gross): 66,722 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PR DPOSAL: Proposal to construct a 133 unit hotel; a four-story structure with a maximum building height of 49 feet, 6 inches, and a total building area of 66,723 square feet. Access is proposed off SW 16th Street and there are 141 parking spaces on the site. There is a 1,850 sq.ft. Category 3 wetland in the northwest corner of the site which would not be directly impacted by the pr)posal. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics — Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RI"LATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RE_ATED COMMENTS We haver ' wed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas wher additional info' needed to properly assess this proposal. 3/9(1M Signature o 'rector or A thor' a epresentative Rev 10/93 DEVAPP DO City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: IAw-ro COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 5, 1999 APPLICATION NO'. LUA-99-029,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 22, 1999 APPLICANT: Can(lewood Hotel Company, Inc. PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen PROJECT TITLE: Candlewood Suites Hotel WORK ORDER NO: 78500 LOCATION: 900E W 16th Street SITE AREA: 2.9 ages BUILDING AREA(new expansion gross): 66,722 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construct a 133 unit hotel; a four-story structure with a maximum building height of 49 feet, 6 inches, and a total building area of 66,723 square feet. Access is proposed off SW 16th Street and there are 141 parking spaces on the site There is a 1,850 sq.ft. Category 3 wetland in the northwest corner of the site which would not be directly impacted by the pr oposal. A. ENVIRONME NTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics _ Water Light/Glare -\ Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet _ t+o NA B. POLICY-RI'LATED COMMENTS 14Q C. CODE-RE_4TED COMMENTS The proposed construction is situated within the 179' maximum elevation area surrounding the airport. We have reviewed this a.plication with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where a itonal info n is needed to properly assess this proposal. l 11 T 777 Signatu of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP O Rev 10/53 �,q��II I0 ful tfLL 1• � : ' Ij 1 - - / ' ( �� a" 1 T .sly)1 /` l c • .H — -.4 Ma "� f M .1 t . 1k rt,..91 411, • c.c.( 1-- lOc' 7). i :it jaPV.11 . i ' 1 Mh-= 1 t "i• ; NI . . at; (_;__,„ 4_,41,1., ::,.... i\i„ .4.1 , A.it lc—--I.k-ii-g:— -1 P.ri.‘\' / ,'4 r:,..,.n,.,.._. 4 2 1 r-' azia IaII.Mi _ « r• 3., ''t.'.-) t.%\-OY.4/ Ii. '+{n/"i1 •_■ e1 Y_ nw;Y 1 v i 0 w m 1 g tHt4 t« tWIi 1 kk"&'A r- ) „oil- - . . 1 r . ,ipp , p ----. , la . ,. , : ,,,,/ 4,si M0II \ ,,,,\<, rk,, ,,,.-i,ork, 100:,(--.7*I ., i ii;�� ' V�` t-■ •• ill - ®�,IY� "II 11 to R3- '1:::121;5. \ist \ m �l a rFr r n sooki Ili ., „ A rA • 1 • A,rA . ,-----,--• .-a- ..- , I, 1-4 , 4r(itik i I-4 r n ® f I. 9 .1LTT 0 f 0:4 ■�4 A It P �� ,_. ,,,,, _.- ,_ i if Lag ro VOL) IP':rrtate.----,- A striAl IPN '1" --. . 2 .' '-'-' alliV*4441411P ri- „IF„ - el-tuf'4%-ii.-. 4'w1bilfri"\•.-- ik'. iii ll- zil':13... N4,9 p t. ,_. 't vati 1 ®iLizaitt . — ._. rioiFilk k(�(444 ,.:= -- l . li( D¢r .::::411:11 .1 Ill'IlW‘ . Ifit:4::'',_. cc ' \ ..4 : amalla '1 ,,,,141.0 -, •••,, Ow- -�®y1(�' «VrM i'-+ ~ �('�401 .', ®�QJ�PLI� 1 �J[nhG � � ` r n•A -,•1r ® .��® ' a iil • ill :.T M 4 _ t t,fp. IIf�1f111 fh�I 11 III. o l ��o��' `i�\n�f Y'• • UJ ❑1�1 nri� .al �(� , 1_l0 .. 01 + Li N'ffal -jb Olk 1 P ■ ■ ..«1 m-071hj!I I Ni1i pill l I' .tuar iKl,�?inr �, f; 1 tc+j 111 „�J 1 itII ire a nu. . d •`�I Q+xi�T] •mril iT r i • g 7 it i�J 1� t1 `.irav+ 1 Q.J rcmr�i I. � -3; y 12M I _. • . • I A LLR1�il '� • \ 3 Ws H~ a ;�_ l r ��- �' vnr 1 , �_ ■ sat, iii 4 Sri.Fiwi •,...i.lea 4.11 ^\v.7 . Ak , r EL•[ta l•�MI C O • ___.. _ikfwJ . 1 , - i if . -_-:--:-:::::_f_6::-:-:::::::::::.:::::::::::__--::::::_:_:41111WAV•OC 7rkTM, L , . , -. . . .,4,;.-:-..,a_.,iii_itl,..,:. ,,,,-JE ,.. nr, r.,,,,,,, \ ..,,:::::::::::„.:::::::::-„K„:::::::::::::::::::__„:„.:,,,. „,.., ,,,,, , _:_-_.::::::::::::::_-_-:,_:„..„.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::___„:„..„___,\,,,„r 4,„,,.,,, ,, _E - Q ._ 6 114-' froWill "- "1 11 2 \----"r". 7 1 T d_:I k 1:i2SE:::::::EEE:KEE EEE:E:E::::::::;E:EEE::'E:E:::F::;.'7...:EE::::::i.:::::::.::::::.5.5.R...]:...E.:1::...:‘,. ,...1/4‘.4.,,, wi 0 .4...4, Igo A -* I lag. .,4e.fi IV '-' ,6-p. Iv-, 19 f. - -:-::::::::::_;::::::::::::::_1-s--E:E:E:E:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::_:4::::::::_ ‘. ar _. .0 lull' ill iv _ . si• -. • _. • , , .. .. ..,urim_pili '1 '''Az '''''‘' ',":.,....4 \\ - 'r1-7 ''' ** ^ a ....,_§,..1..::::::::.„,E.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::„:„:„.„:„.,:::::. -__:::::„,„:„:„___:::„_:_______::::::_:::_„_:___E________________., ...... lf.li 1 1 IN N-7:-:-::::::::::::::::_ -_,:kA,Fc: :::::: ;441-.„-42::::::::::::::::::::_z_u_:::::_::::;K: \., \,___liki 44 IQ-. .-. ' ,..' -.4\4 I •. ii witmst-,-..t._ =-.4,-Nsfi.,...:_EE_EEFEEF.3-_.:-..-1.-3-_.::.::.::.1Er..5.E_-_-3_-:::::::-E_E:::_::::-.3:3-::.:23:::::_::::::.:-_.E_:_-7-:::_:_::::::13.3::::::::_f_.._::::::-..E_:_::.:::__-_:::::::::::::::.::.:.-:_:._.:::::::_;_..._::::::_........i.:.:_- ___::_:E:31::::::::::::_,, ------tt4p\k r,.. „E.. ,1 . .,.. ...... /2„,---. _i_. -. EfEft 1:.,::;::::::::::::E:E:E:_:::::tE:E:E::_CE::::_f:::::_::_IE::::E:E:_E:E:::':E:E:::;:::::::::E:E::::27;1._-:_:_::::::::::_-__::::::::.t.E.:__-__, 5 .), ' ii,- IL- -- - , ilia 11."3':"'".3 1 2' '•::::::::-:::::::::-:-:-:-:-:::::::::::::::-::::::::::-:-:-:-.:-:::::::::::::::::::::::_:-:--::::::-:_::E:Ef::K.::.?:::: ::" ilijiik, i 'ILI all ak / 31---"ISE fr. : -' 7 ":::::::":-:-.:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:::::::::-.7:•:-:-:-7.---.^:-:-:^7.-7.-::::::::::::::..:-::-::-:-:..:..ar.-•.....Cf.%_:_:_:-_:.:_:_:_:::_:::: ti 1 L 1 al I-1 -::::37:::::E:E:E^E:E::::::55-a:-.33.::::::_::::.:E.::::::-:-:::::::::::E:Ei:E.R.EE:E:E:E f::::i...:::4.2::::::.:::.:KE::::145:E:K: ir-------; .9,411 fir T._ ‘.'IL, Igm__,...0. . do taliscr, . : ../::::::::::::.:.::::::::::::__:EREEE:73-:::::::::::::::;:__-:K:::.:::::: cf•ick--_:_:::::::::::::::::::::_!:::::::::::_::::::::_:::::::::::::::_::::::_:::_::::_:_::______„____:::::::::::...::--.-,-—."......-...------—-.......... i , A -:::::_=3:_:_:-:::::_:_:-::::::::-::333:::--::-:-:-:--:::33:_:_Kf.-- 106. -_::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::_:::_:_:„ ...:_:_. • rt _ _ ____ , of _ ____ ____ ___ IO 3 ,-- ,-- qt &°IL;: e x'-_ra _=_= N II��1I 1 I f -- -=ti===__. 1� �i \\' '1 cal - I� t•HIVVLIVVVlJV JV1 I L..'� Ill)) � 1 1'1 �' �.• i� t� I__ ? VICINITY M A f 4\ 1 , � ,� �' �,� { N Scale 1" - 200' .• 's L. 0� 3 Lb 1 6 5 �1 �'' n�� �,� OF v,A� PO -OppI ��j3 12 11 10 9 9- , I 1 • �— Ft�G _ G R I' r r 1-4to. 21 22 1 ,�_�- I, 1 10 r Hi-sis,5- 114-`-t_ �� �� r-� /•-- i S• IS 14I13 12 I 1' 1 �?1 y `•� Z(�019 Id 11 16 1" —1� 9 51 152 S3 Ivit.o ' - z ,�,_ Qs 41 L 1� I LIGHT° m �;�,.•� is tc 2S zS - �40 41 1213 4 I I �- b 1, 1 Ir 1 1111 �. .j Jl �1"I I•• d J ----�� �� = - J 35jJ �31 � �, -� i„ -J �� - jCi ,�.v, '' O• �32133 34 1- v 1 Ira II 10 9�� w `'Li ,���� t1_;E,i.. N S Fr'iC rci- '6 7 1 i 11 4 3 i� S 16 I7 12 21 22 �� �-" II 10 9I_L y —r 61 ,114 I --�.�.� s. i • - *r' Il 16 IS W 13L2 s r t0 5Q c 5. _, - a 515153 ASS '`:j;'".r `� > 0 16 2` ZA 13 2Z 21 20 19 _ _ ^- ;, — - — N IN Y T 4y, _�� — 8• ..- - .': :::......___ -- — c,m,re 60 I� ,rst.a2 ii IS' 3j 1 •"' • L.1 effff i/f ff ;rT,?,. •^rl 'r —a,— u E 16�0.7 } 1�.; y,,,G jF11 .El \:,�\ Q 12 - 2 ._ d I Q d,�lc ,11p „�r1 1 �� �� \� 0 'P. _,VIP ^-,71 -�:es 1 SITE LAG i 4 ,, �'1, I VACANT• ' 6l:- 2 , ,I Q 120 ?i 12132�l25 `-21 1' -,..•os j:'% 1 I , i I p '14 I15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 13 24 25 ; _.�_r I �' in I' S.W ri 1 f 16TH Sr - _ , 94 135 I • 1 ,• . 1• 1 • I` t I• I I • 1 I � I\ I C I; ` I I 11 1 I -1 I C I ' 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 y�'� 1 ' I ; I 1 1 1 1 1 ,1�1� 1 ^� I . I I •.Icl• �;�^ I ►I,1; 1.-.1,.1 I -..L.Y I: I I;s -- +_ L.: 1'I 1_ I 11 • 1 - . -I 1. , I I 1 1 OFFICE ,..t _ _-� I 1 .1_e, _ > _L ' ' -1_ 1 - > -L- ,, J-_1 -J_��J�__I_1 F-- o cn I— 8 �, ¢ cn ¢ m I Wo 3 J 0 > (n o - ¢ S.W. 10TH STREET r Q— v S.W. GRAD' WAY a C --ISR ' •• ----- w II _ .________-__ N O / , SW 16th STREET W w p I SITE i o O 4; oc O ,;: LLw SpR�N w G6 O J /P°°/r U 1 o tIN VICINITY MAP a NO SCALE li - V) LEGEND: L w a° PROPOSED TYPE II CATCH BASIN O c) a) v e Q O Z `• PROPOSED TYPE I CATCH BASIN IIIIII Q 3 E E < EXISTING TYPE II CATCH BASIN O •q 1-4w �� EXISTING TYPE I CATCH BASIN El 0QI Q'v E a PROPOSED STORM DRAINAGE LINE iml `' o t a 0 �'N EXISTING STORM DRAINAGE LINE Al s:- ° 0 PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE • CITY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION LIST OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS within 300 feet of the subject site PROJECT NAME: Candlewood Hotel APPLICATION NO: LUIt • q 9 • 0 2-1 S p- CGt The following is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. The Development Services Division will notify these individuals of the proposed development. NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER MSI 800 S.W. 16th, LLC 1109 First Avenue, Suite 500 334040-6430 Seattle, WA 98101 Benaroya Capital Company 1001 - 4th Avenue, Suite 4700 334040-5300 Seattle, WA 98154 Bitney Grouws Company 108 Factory Ave. No., Suite 1 334040-6120 Renton, WA 98055 Cummins NW, Inc. 811 S.W. Grady Way 334040-6625 Renton, WA 98057 International Business & 335 - 116th Avenue S.E. 334040-7100 Institution Bellevue, WA 98004 City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way 334040-5305 Renton, WA 98055 MAR () [ RECE . 6882.006[BD\sm] (Continued) NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER • Applicant Certification . I, 3E Ts' .Y)EK , hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property (Print Name) owners and their addresses were obtained from: ❑ City of Renton Technical Services Records '❑ Title Company Records Al King County Assessors Records • j�n STUeF'`�� Signed 1 L�C.rI�(i ^ L/L /L/ Date ! .'/l ••\SS104;••�'p111 (App cant) ,Q. . fo: G r •0 NOTARY -33. c! NOTARY • m ATTESTED: ubscr'bed and sworn before me, a Notary Public and fo4��,e.Ssate 'Way ington, residing at \'Q�� on thee\ day of �`'Q,•\,c �'�9- ,1•',i, . (Notary Public) CERTIFICATION OF MAILING hereby c:ert+fy that notices of the proposca�d application were mailed to (City mpiDyee) caci listed ( rop rty owner on Signed Date; NOTARY ATTEST: subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, Qn and for the State of Wa shington rasidiri on the _ '+1 day of .. . ._.. ._._�. 1 [Signed , rst�.doc V REV07/95 MARILYN KAMCHEFF COMMISSION EXPIRES 6/29/99 A• Enviromnental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: None. 1V C Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: The proposal will be subject to the City's Environmental Ordinance,Zoning Code NOTICE OF APPLICATION regulations,Public Works Standard's,Uniform Building Code.Uniform Fire Code,etc.These adopted codes and standards will function to mitigate project AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF impacts. NON-SIGNIFICANCE, MITIGATED(DNS, M) Proposed Mitigation Measures: The following Mitigation Measures will likely be imposed on the proposed project.These recommended Mitigation Measures address project impacts not covered by existing codes and regulations as cited above. 1.Traffic Mitigation Fee-875.00 per new average daily trip attributed to the proposal. DATE: March 22,1999 2.Fire Mitigation Fee-$0.52 per square fool of new constitution. LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-99-029,SA-A,ECF APPLICATION NAME: CANDLEW000 SUITES HOTEL Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Mr. Peter Rosen,Project Manager, Development Services Division,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on April 5,1999. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Proposal to construct a 133 unit hotel:a four-story structure with a maximum notification by mail,contact Mr.Rosen at(425)430-7219. Anyone who submits written comments will building height of 49 lentil Inches.and a total building area of 88,723 square feet.Access Is proposed off SW 18th automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. Street and them are 141 parking spaces on the site. CONTACT PERSON: MR.PETER ROSEN (425)430-7219 There is a 1,850 sq.It Category 3 wetland In the northwest comer of the site.Category 3 wetlands which are hydrologically isolated and are less than 5.000 square in area are exempted from City wetland regulations. t PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION PROJECT LOCATION: 900 SW 18th Street OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED(ONS-M):As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore,as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS(M)process to give notice that a ONS-M is likely to be issued.Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are Integrated into a single comment period.There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated(DNS-M).A 14 day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: March 01,1999 - S cu, wood sates norm. •j NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: March 22,1999 j y ? APPLICANT: Candlewood Hotel Company,Inc.;do Weis Builders,Inc.,Attn:Jeff Melby, 8009.34th Avenue South,Minneapolis,MN 55425 ._ OWNER: Susan McLeod,Stuart Ness and Steven Ness Permits/Review Requested: SEPA Environmental Review;Administrative Site Plan Approval v 1 Other Permits which may be required: Building and Construction Permits 1 TM`^ SIT,1 . Requested Studies: Wetland Report,Traffic Report,Drainage Analysis,Geotechnical Report. vt.: Location where application may g9p a!• W` w be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, ,c o 1055 South Grady Way.Renton,WA 98055 a v PUBLIC HEARING: Not required,administrative review only. •�,_ 4:; • �,tkrd'" il CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: • I -' 'I ; • Analytical process Project consistency refers to whether a project Is consistent with adopted and applicable development regulations,or in their absence,comprehensive plan policies.RCW 38.7013.110(2)(g)provides that the Notice of Application(NOA) Include a statement of the preliminary determination of a project's consistency with the type of land use,level of development,infrastructure,and character of development it one has been made at the time of notice.At a minimum, every NOA shall include a determination of the project's consistency with the zoning,comprehensive plan and development regulations. Land Use: The site Is zoned Commercial Office (CO) and is located within the Employment Area-Valley Comprehensive Plan designation. The proposed hotel is allowed as a secondary use In the CO zone provided the site location is within the Employment Area-Valley Comprehensive Plan designation. The proposal complies with development standards of the CO zone and it is consistent with Comprehensive Plan policies of the Employment Area-Valley Comprehensive Plan designation. CERTIFICATION I, 3—c, CSC Z , hereby certify that c3 copies of the above document were posted by me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby • the described property on 3/ 5/q 9' • • • Signed: d, eA17v ATTEST: Subcribed and sworn before me, a Nortary Pub:1>;2e -i-ele c, in and for the State of Washington residing in `� 0-n�-®-YI , on the 4---14. day of Q /9 4 9. ctAy,,_% MARILYN KAMCHEFF COMMISSION EXPIRES 6/29/99 CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator Jesse Tanner,Mayor ' March 22, 1999 Mr. Bruce Creager Barghausen Consulting Engineers 18215-72nd Avenue South Kent, WA 98032 SUBJECT: Candlewood Suites Hotel Project No. LUA-99-029,SA-A,ECF Dear Mr. Creager: The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on April 13, 1999. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. Please contact me, at (425) 430-7219, if you have any questions. Sincerely, 6)1Q)Q"\e-4^- Peter Rosen cc: Property Owners Candlewood Hotel Company, Inc. AG�PTLTR.00. 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 (Vy 0 NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE, MITIGATED (DNS, M) DATE: March 22,1999 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-99-029,SA-A,ECF APPLICATION NAME: CANDLEWOOD SUITES HOTEL PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Proposal to construct a 133 unit hotel;a four-story structure with a maximum building height of 49 feet,6 inches,and a total building area of 66,723 square feet. Access is proposed off SW 16th Street and there are 141 parking spaces on the site. There is a 1,850 sq.ft.Category 3 wetland in the northwest comer of the site. Category 3 wetlands which are hydrologically isolated and are less than 5,000 square in area are exempted from City wetland regulations. PROJECT LOCATION: 900 SW 16th Street OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED(DNS-M): As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore,as permitted under the RCW 43.21 C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS(M)process to give notice that a DNS-M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated(DNS-M). A 14 day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: March 01,1999 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: March 22, 1999 APPLICANT: Candlewood Hotel Company,Inc.;do Weis Builders,Inc.,Attn: Jeff Melby, 8009-34th Avenue South,Minneapolis,MN 55425 5' / OWNER: Susan McLeod,Stuart Ness and Steven Ness Y Permits/Review Requested: SEPA Environmental Review;Administrative Site Plan Approval Other Permits which may be required: Building and Construction Permits Requested Studies: Wetland Report,Traffic Report,Drainage Analysis,Geotechnical Report. Location where application may be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 PUBLIC HEARING: Not required,administrative review only. CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Analytical process Project consistency refers to whether a project is consistent with adopted and applicable development regulations,or in their absence,comprehensive plan policies. RCW 36.70B.110(2)(g)provides that the Notice of Application(NOA) include a statement of the preliminary determination of a project's consistency with the type of land use,level of development,infrastructure,and character of development if one has been made at the time of notice. At a minimum, every NOA shall include a determination of the project's consistency with the zoning,comprehensive plan and development regulations. Land Use: The site is zoned Commercial Office (CO) and is located within the Employment Area-Valley Comprehensive Plan designation. The proposed hotel is allowed as a secondary use in the CO zone provided the site location is within the Employment Area-Valley Comprehensive Plan designation. The proposal complies with development standards of the CO zone and it is consistent with Comprehensive Plan policies of the Employment Area-Valley Comprehensive Plan designation. GENMALOT.DOC Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed I"roject: None. Development Regulatiol s Used For Project Mitigat ion: The proposal will be subject to the City's Environmental Ordinance,Zoning Code regulations,Public Works Standard's, Uniform Building Code, Uniform Fire Code,etc. These adopted codes and standards will function to mitigate project impacts. Proposed Mitigation Measures: The following Mitigation N easures will likely be imposed on the proposed project. These recommended Mitigation Measures address project impacts not covered by existing codes and regulations as cited above. 1. Traffic Mitigation Fee-$75.00 per new average daily trip attributed to the proposal. 2. Fire Mitigation Fee-1 0.52 per square foot of new construction. Comments on the abo re application must be submitted in writing to Mr. Peter Rosen, Project Manager, Development Services I)ivision, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055, by 5:00 PM on April 5, 1999. If you have questions al.out this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, co itact Mr. Rosen at (425) 430-7219. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: MR. PETER ROSEN (425)430-7219 'PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION CANDLEWOOD SUITES HOTEL • " 1 1 1 I Q I VICINITY MAP II ��I ' "lf N l._sc.l.r.wo' I , G �' � R 0' °�4 TER57ATE NWY=---� -- 3 r ' ©\\ SITE h • .447- ' . I• .. S.W. t«1 16TN sr \,. _ •l ' DAY CAM 1},once •\➢'' • ra, tot_ I OFFICE { L «, I A • . : � .;11 [Tr. .............. '" " DEVELUPNIENT SERVICES DIV1StON" LAND USE PERMI• PR1JPERTY OWNFR(S) PROJECT INFORMATION ;Note Tf there is more pan one',Iegal owner please attach an additional: notarized Master A lication for:each owner. PP PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: NAME: Susan McLeod, Stuart C. Ness Candlewood Suites Hotel and St'tven A. Ness PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION: ADDRESS: 900 SW 16th Street • 6645 North Ensign Renton, WA 98550 CITY: Portland ZIP: 97217 KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): 334040-6261-06 334040-6260-07 TELEPHONE NUMBER: EXISTING LAND USE(S): ............................................................................................................................................ Vacant .............................................................................................................................................. APPLICANT.tif other that 0w00.) `':: :> NAME: Candlewood Hotel Company, Inc. PROPOSED LAND USES: Hotel COMPANY(if applicable): c/o Weis Builders, Inc. EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: Attn: Jeff Melby Employment Area Valley ADDRESS: 8009 34th Avenue South PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): N/A CITY: Minneapolis, MN ZIP: 55425 EXISTING ZONING: CO, Commercial Office TELEPHONE NUMBER: (612) 858-9999 PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): CONTACT R... .. N/A ,� ��T SITE AREA (SQ. FT. OR ACREAGIOL-_,, ' , ft-- NAME: or( Bruce Creager 2.9 Acres O 1.(3 MAR 1\r D COMPANY (if applicable): Barghausen Consulting PROJECT VALUE: ck G 1 v� Engineers $5 ,000,000.00 ADDRESS: 18215 72nd Avenue South IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? No CITY: Kent, WA ZIP: 98032 IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA? TELEPHONE NUMBER: No (425) 251-6222 H Of::PROPg fg Attagh>s� .ate sheet �f necessary) Z:: :::<::;;:<::><:>::>. ;{.�::::>:>::<:. LEGAL.DESCrs�rTlO..:::::.::::..:::::...:... :..:. ...:.........C.... ................:.:)r:.......:...... ......... . See Attachment • • ............ I•..:.:::..:::::.....................::. . . .:: ...:..................: .:... :.. - <. .:: :: .: `i: ... :: iis>::iii::::i:::ii:::i:::i:::iii:::;:;: :;:'..':::::iii::::ii:%::" :.:: :i::.+>::i;'.:..�._::.:.:::i :::.::::ii:is;:ii i i '':•ii:'•:'••iiii.:::': ..:4ii::.:iii;:,.�.'.;:.:. .:'•.'.•::': :iii:::...: .. :::: .. �: :.::.. � ..T�-. .�.� � �/ .......................... ........... ....: :.,. >: :::: :� i >. f•:.. . .5.::.h l .:--Cl �� Check �ll appl�cativn type : t a�.aPP Y'::;.. tY sta wil ,eter0ne ees ;:>: ::>:::..::.:... ::: _ANNEXATION $ SUBDIVISION: _ COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT $ _ REZONE $ _ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ _ SPECIAL PERMIT $ _ SHORT PLAT $ _TEMPORARY PERMIT $ _TENTATIVE PLAT $ _CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ _ PRELIMINARY PLAT $ SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ 1000 . L. ' _ FINAL PLAT $ _GRADE & FILL PERMIT $ (NO. CU. YDS: 1 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ _VARIANCE $ (FROM SECTION: 1 _ PRELIMINARY _WAIVER $ _ FINAL _WETLAND PERMIT $ ROUTINE VEGETATION — MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ _ BINDING SITE PLAN $ SHORELINE REVIEWS: _SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ _ CONDITIONAL USE $ _VARIANCE $ — EXEMPTION $No Charue X ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ t,OO.(-)o REVISION $ AFFIDAVIT OE OWNERSHIP I, (Print Name)J. Nicholas Howelldeclare that I am (please check one)_the owner of the property involved in this application,_the authorized representative to act for the property owner(please attach proof of authorization), and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of 111Clin�� residing at • �Nam Ovvn /Rep tive) 1�1iL �, , on the�day of . N la owP �- 1991. 4Si natt. of O ner/Represe ve) •P iaLtAotsc Sig ature of Notary Public) M O NoKItary R.Public-StateDAVENP of KanaRTas My Appt. Expires.II- 0 .30�) (This section to be completed by City Staff.) City`Fite Number:::L 4 -r-C,`. <_ A •AAD BSP CAP-S C.,P-U CPA CU-A CU-H LLA MHP FPUD FP PP•R '< RVMP A-A SA-H SHPL-A`' SHPL-H •>tr�;*: SM` SME TP V-A V-B V-H 'W , TOTAL FEES: •$%SO 4. q TOTAL POSTAGE PROVIDED: S t.` l. Q., ' - 33) MASTERAP.DOC REVISED 8/97 SCHEDULE A2 Order No. 394032-5K DESCRIPTION: - LOTS 1 THROUGH 34 IN BLOCK 36 OF C.D. HILLMAN' S EARLINGTON GARDENS ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SEATTLE, DIVISION NO. 1, ACCORDING TO PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 17 OF PLATS AT PAGE (S) 74, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF VACATED THOMAS AVENUE SOUTHWEST (83RD AVENUE SOUTH) ADJOINING OR ABUTTING THEREON, WHICH UPON VACATION, ATTACHED TO SAID PREMISES BY OPERATION OF LAW; EXCEPT THE EAST 40 FEET THEREOF, VACATED BY CITY OF RENTON ORDINANCE NO. 3195 ; EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY NO. 1 BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 5443689 . Page 3 0E1i. l5. n993, S: i rM 4256W1:1b 1tU1LV Kb CANDLEW00D HOTEL CO Ali. I000 r. 02/e2 FEB-23-99 TUE 10: 16 AM FAX HO, P. 03 Feb-23-99 O21:43A Noss bolding Company 503-978-2190 P.02 i`'l'.SS Il0/,/)/N(i ('0.%f1"/I Nf' February 23, 1999 City of Renton Planning Department 1055 South Grady Way Renton WA 98055 To Whom It May Concern: Candlewood Hotel Company and its consultants have our permission to submit for Site Plan Approval for a four story, 133-unit Candlewood Suites Hotel to be built on our site at SOO SW 16th Street. Please call me if you have any questions. • yours, 7141 , A S = • - A. Ness 503-9 :-2100 PROJECT NARRATIVE CANDLEWOOD SUITES HOTEL 900 BLOCK OF S.W. 16TH STREET RENTON, WASHINGTON 98550 FEBRUARY 26, 1999 1. Project name, size, and location of site: Candlewood Suites Hotel 900 block of S.W. 16th Street Renton, Washington 98550 Section 24, Township 23, Range 4 East, W.M., King County, Washington Size of site: 2.9 acres 2. Zoning designation of the site and adjacent properties: a. Site: CO, Commercial Office b. Adjacent Properties: �; V LOPA^CNT PIA` North: SR-405 CITY OF RENTOW • South: IM, Industrial-Medium MAR 1,�g East: IM, Industrial-Medium West: IM, Industrial-Medium RECEIVED 3. Current use of the site and any existing improvements: The subject property is located in the Green River Valley portion of the city and is approximately 2.9 acres in size. The property is generally flat, heavily vegetated, and contains a small wetland in the northwest corner of the site. There are no structures currently on the site. The surrounding area is composed of a variety of commercial and light industrial uses. 4. Special site features (i.e., wetlands, water bodies, steep slopes): A small low quality wetland is located in the northwest corner of the site. The wetland is approximately 1,850 square feet in size and will be preserved in its current condition. Please see the Wetland Evaluation prepared by B&A, Inc., enclosed with this application for more detail. According to FIRM Map No. 53033C0978F, revised May 16, 1995, approximately one-half of the subject property is within a 100-year floodplain. The floodplain boundary is shown on the submitted plans. 5. Statement addressing soil type and drainage conditions: According to the Soil Conservation Service map for this area, the soil is classified as Urban Land, which is soil that has been modified by disturbance of the natural layers with additions of fill material several feet thick to accommodate large industrial and housing installations. In the Green River Valley, the fill -1- 6882.007 [CSF/sm/ph] ranges from about 3 feet to more than 12 feet in thickness and from gravelly sandy loam to gravelly loam in texture. The erosion hazard is slight to moderate. 6. Proposed use of the property and scope of the proposed development (i.e., height, square footage, lot coverage, parking, access, etc.): The Candlewood Hotel Company proposes to construct a 133-unit hotel on a vacant parcel located at S.W. 16th Street between the vacated streets of Pacific Avenue S.W. and Thomas Avenue S.W. The hotel will consist of one four-story structure with horizontal siding and brick accents with composition shingles on a pitched-gable roof. The proposed building height is 49 feet 6 inches and the proposed lot coverage is 13.6 percent. One hundred forty-one (141)parking spaces are proposed with access to the site from S.W. 16th Street. The project proposes two stormwater drainage retention ponds and approximately 11,850 square feet of landscaping. 7. Proposed off-site improvements (i.e., installation of sidewalks, fire hydrants, sewer main, etc.): Proposed off-site improvements include the installation of a 5-foot landscape planter strip and 5-foot sidewalk along the frontage of the property. Public utilities are currently available at front of the property. 8. Total estimate construction cost and estimated fair market value of the proposed project: Estimated construction cost: $5,000,000 Estimated fair market value: $7,000,0o0 9. Estimated quantities and type of materials involved if any fill or excavation is proposed: Approximate fill quantity - 5,350 cubic yards Source of fill -to be determined 10. Number, type and size of trees to be removed: Excluding the existing wetland vegetation, all existing vegetation will be removed from the site during construction. According to the attached Wetland Evaluation by B&A, Inc., existing vegetation on the site is a regrowth after an historic disturbance. The forest canopy of the site is made up of red alder, black cottonwood, Pacific willow, and scattered Oregon ash. The scrub/shrub canopy is dominated by red dogwood, snowberry, and spirea. The herbaceous canopy is made up of reed canarygrass, and creeping buttercup with scattered sedges, soft rush and lady fern. The vine canopy is dominated by Himalayan blackberry and morning glory. Please see the Tree Cutting/Land Clearing(tree inventory)Plan for more detailed information regarding number, type, and size of trees to be removed. 11. Explanation of any land to be dedicated to the City: No land is proposed to be dedicated to the City at this time. -2- 6882.007 [CSF/sm/ph] PARKING, LOT COVERAGE, LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS CANDLEWOOD SUITES HOTEL 900 BLOCK OF S.W.16TH STREET RENTON, WASHINGTON 98550 FEBRUARY 26, 1999 SITE DIMENSIONS: Length 321.41 feet Width 410.01 feet Gross Total Area 2.9 acres Existing Impervious Surface 0 square feet Existing Natural Undeveloped Area 126,324 square feet Total Westland Area 1,850 square feet BUILDING SETBACKS/HEIGHT LIMITATIONS: Proposed Front Yard 37± feet(20 feet minimum required) Proposed Side Yard 11± feet(0 feet minimum required) Proposed Side Yard 194± feet(0 feet minimum required) Proposed Rear Yard 67± feet(20 feet minimum required) Proposed Building Height 49.5 feet(250 feet maximum allowed) COVERAGE: Building Square Footage by Floor 16,680 square feet Building Square Footage Overall 66,722 square feet Percent Lot Coverage--Buildings and Structures 13.4 percent Total Asphalt Pavement 53,064 square feet PARKING REQUIREMENTS: Parking Standard 1 per unit;2 per 3 employees Number of Spaces Required 137 Number of Spaces Provided 141 Standard Stall Size 9 feet by 20 feet Compact Stall Size 8.5 feet by 16 feet Compact Percentage Allowed 30 percent Compact Percentage Provided 22 percent ADA Accessible Stalls 5 Aisle Width(minimum) 24 feet Location and Size of Curb Cut 109.84 feet to center of driveway from southeastern property corner. 45-lineal-feet curb cut(1)with 5-foot landscaped meridian. LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS: Strip Buffer along Street Frontage 10 feet Rear Yard Landscaping Required 10 feet Side Yard Landscaping Required 0 feet Interior Parking Lot Landscaping 5 percent Minimum Landscape Island Width 5 feet Proposed square feet of Landscaping(Parking Lot) 2,674 square feet Proposed square feet of Landscaping(Wildlife Habitat) 2,538 square feet tv141?IG Proposed square feet of Landscaping(Total) 11,852 square feet L� EL-OPl�1EN7 N ON CITY[OF RE MAR 01 1999 RECEIVED 6882.011 [CSF/els] CONSTRUCTION MITIGATION DESCRIPTION CANDLEWOOD HOTEL The following is a summary of the construction mitigation measures that are proposed for the Candlewood Hotel in accordance with Item No. 10 of the Site Plan Approval Submittal Requirement Form: 1. Proposed Construction Dates: Construction of the project is scheduled to begin in September 1999, and it is anticipated to be completed by September 2000. 2. Hours of Operation: The hours of operation during construction of the project is anticipated to be from 7 a.m. to 5 p.m. or up to the maximum allowable hours of operation approved by the City of Renton. 3. Proposed Hauling/Transportation Routes: Although the haul route for trucking imported fill material and removal of debris and unsuitable material has not yet been determined, it is anticipated that the haul route will be along S.W. 16th Street to East Valley Road,or Lind Avenue S.W.,or as directed by the City of Renton. 4. Measures to be Implemented to Minimize Dust,Traffic,and Transportation Impacts,Mud, Noise, and Other Noxious Characteristics: Mitigation measures during the construction phase will include an erosion and sedimentation control plan that will include temporary construction entrances, silt fence, ditching, and a sedimentation control pond that will control any site runoff so as not to impact adjacent properties or nearby water bodies. Water trucks will be provided as required during the construction phase for dust control and flaggers will be available as needed at the site entrances during the trucking operations for traffic control. Construction equipment will meet or exceed Washington State emission standards for noise and pollution. In addition, street cleaning and sweeping will be provided on an as needed basis, as determined necessary by the on-site Superintendent and/or City Inspector. 1p APR �� �G 6882.012[BDS/bsdj CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST OUR JOB NO. 6882 A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Candlewood Suites Hotel 2. Name of Applicant: Candlewood Hotel Company c/o Mr. Jeff Melby WEIS Builders, Inc. 8009 - 34th Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55425 (612) 858-9999 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Mr. Bruce Creager Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. 18215 72nd Avenue South Kent, WA 98032 (425) 251-6222 4. Date checklist prepared: February 26, 1999 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): The applicant would like to begin construction in September 1999 with completion in May of 2000. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion,or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No. DEVELOPMENT PIJ,`;;;;;,�; CITY OF REN-1 C MAR 01 1999 RECEIVED 6882.005 [CSF/els] 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared,or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Geotechnical Engineering Report by Earth Consultants Inc. - see attached Traffic Impact Analysis by David Hamlin and Associates - see attached Wetland Evaluation by B & A, Inc. - see attached 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None known. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Agency Permit Type City of Renton Site Plan Approval City of Renton SEPA Determination City of Renton Grading Permit City of Renton Building, Plumbing, and Mechanical Permits City of Renton Sign Permit Washington State Department of Fish& Wildlife HPA Permit 11. Give a brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. The Candlewood Hotel Company proposes to construct a 133-unit hotel on a vacant parcel located at S.W. 16th Street between the vacated streets of Pacific Avenue S.W. and Thomas Avenue S.W. The hotel will consist of one 4-story structure with horizontal siding and composition shingles on a pitched gable roof. The subject property is located in the Green River Valley portion of the city and is approximately 2.9 acres in size. The property is generally flat, heavily vegetated, and contains a small wetland in the northwest corner of the site. The surrounding area is composed of a variety of commercial and light industrial uses. 6882.005 [CSF/els] EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. 900 Block of S.W. 16th Street Renton, WA 98550 Section 24, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., King County, Washington B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Typical site slopes do not exceed six percent. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. According to the Soil Conservation Service map for this area, the soil is classified as Urban Land, which is soil that has been modified by disturbance of the natural layers with additions of fill material several feet thick to accommodate large industrial and housing installations. In the Green River Valley, the fill ranges from about 3 feet to more than 12 feet in thickness and from gravelly sandy loam to gravelly loam in texture. The erosion hazard is slight to moderate. Please see attached Geotechnical Engineering Report for more detail. 6882.005 [CSF/els] EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. None known - see attached Geotechnical Engineering Report. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fi11. Approximately Fill Quantity: 5,350 cubic yards Source of Fill: to be determined f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Erosion potential is extremely minimal as the site is surrounded by near flat, pervious surfaces. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Approximately 64 percent of the site will be covered by impervious surfaces, including asphalt paving and buildings. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any. A temporary erosion control plan will be prepared in accordance with City standards to reduce and control erosion during the construction phase. The measures will include temporary drainage swales, temporary mirafi fencing and a temporary sediment pond. 6882.005 [CSF/els] EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal(i.e.,dust,automobile,odors,industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Normal emissions from construction equipment. Some dust will be generated during construction. Automobile emissions may increase very slightly when the project is complete. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions? No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any. The site will be watered as necessary to control dust during construction. Construction equipment will be required to meet state emission control standards. 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate,state what stream or river it flows into. There is an existing wetland of approximately 1,850 square feet in size located within the northwest corner of the property (refer to wetland study by B &A, Inc., dated August 1998). This wetland will be preserved in its current condition. 6882.005 [CSF/els] EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet)the described water? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Yes. Construction of the hotel with associated parking and a stormwater detention facility will occur within 200 feet of the existing wetland. Please refer to the submitted plans and the wetland study by B & A, Inc., for more detail. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. No fill or dredge material will be placed in or removed from the existing wetland. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. No. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. Yes. According to FIRM Map No. 53033C0978F,revised May 16, 1995, approximately one-half of the subject property is within a 100-year floodplain. The floodplain boundary is shown on the submitted plans. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface water? If so, describe the types of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. 6882.005 [CSF/els] EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. No. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...;agricultural;etc.). Describe the general size of the system,the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served(if applicable),or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None. c. Water Runoff: 1) Describe the source of runoff (including stormwater) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities,if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Stormwater runoff from the site will drain into the storm drainage conveyance system designed to handle all runoff. This water will pass through a water quality/detention pond prior to discharge into the wetland at the northwest corner of the property. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No. 6882.005 [CSF/els] EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any. A stormwater conveyance detention and water quality treatment system will be designed and constructed in accordance with City of Renton requirements to reduce and control surface runoff impacts. Also,flood storage compensation will be provided in the northwest corner of the site to mitigate for filling within a portion of the 100-year floodplain. The elevation of the 100-year floodplain for purposes of floodplain compensation was based on a study completed by the City of Renton. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: X deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other X shrubs X grass pasture crop or grain X wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Excluding the wetland vegetation, all on-site vegetation will be removed during construction. According to the attached wetland evaluation by B&A, Inc.,vegetation of the site is a regrowth after the historic disturbance. The forested canopy of the site is made up of red alder, black cottonwood, pacific willow and scattered Oregon ash. The scrub/shrub canopy is dominated by red dogwood, snowberry,and spirea. The herbaceous canopy is made up of reed canarygrass, and creeping buttercup with scattered sedges, soft rush and lady fern. The vine canopy is dominated by Himalayan blackberry and morning glory. 6882.005 [CSF/els] EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any. Ornamental landscaping, including the use of native plants, will be incorporated throughout the developed property. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds an animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: X birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other fish, bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. The Pacific Flyway, which encompasses the majority of the state, is a migratory route for waterfowl. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any. The entire development will be landscaped. 6882.005 [CSF/els] EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electric and natural gas. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any. The buildings will comply with current Washington State Energy Code requirements for glazing and insulation. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any. None. 6882.005 [CSF/els] EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT b. Noise: 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Noise from traffic is anticipated from SR-405 adjacent to the north side of the property. However, this noise is not expected to significantly impact the project. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short term: Construction noise will occur during daylight hours for a period of eight to nine months. No long term increase in noise is expected 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any. Limit construction activity to daylight hours. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The site is currently vacant. The properties to the south, east, and west are occupied by commercial/light industrial structures. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Unknown. c. Describe any structures on the site. None. 6882.005 [CSF/els] EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No. e. What is the current zoning designation of the site? Commercial/Office (CO). f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation for the site? Employment Area Valley. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not applicable. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. A wetland of approximately 1,850 square feet in size is located within the northwest corner of the property. This wetland will be preserved in its current condition. See the attached wetland evaluation for more detail. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Approximately six people will be employed at this hotel. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts,if any. None. 6882.005 [CSF/els] EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any. The proposal meets all development standards for a CO (Commercial Office) zone and is consistent with the Employment Area Valley Comprehensive Plan designation. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low income housing. None. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low income housing. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any. None. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? Structure height -49 feet 6 inches. Exterior materials - horizontal siding and composition shingle roofing. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. 6882.005 [CSF/els] EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any. The architectural styling and exterior building materials will be compatible with the commercial architecture in the surrounding area. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposals produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Minimal glare from exterior lights during evening hours. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None known. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any. Use of shielded light fixtures. 12. Recreation a. What designation and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Lower Talbot Hill Park, Talbot Hill Park, and Thomas Teasdale Park are all within the immediate vicinity of the site. Fort Dent Park, Foster Golf Links, and the Christensen Greenbelt are also in the general area. 6882.005 [CSF/els] EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any. The hotel will include a 15-by 15-foot outdoor gazebo. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state or local preservation registers to be on or next to the site. If so, generally describe. None known. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None known. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any. None. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on-site plans, if any. The Valley Freeway to the east and I-405 to the north are the major highways serving this site. Direct access will be from S.W. 16th Street. 6882.005 [CSF/els] EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? METRO transit stops for Line No. 153 are located on each side of S.W. 16th Street within 100 feet of the subject property. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? The completed project will include on-site parking for 141 vehicles. No stalls will be eliminated. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). Frontage improvements will be required on S.W. 16th Street, including a planter strip and sidewalk. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. The Traffic Impact Analysis by David Hamlin & Associates estimates the total daily trip generation of 455 trips based upon an 80 percent occupancy rate allowed by the City of Renton and the 4.28 trip per room rate measured for Candlewood Hotels by Johnson& Associates. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any. Payment of traffic impact fee as calculated by David I. Hamlin and Associates. 6882.005 [CSF/els] EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services(for example: fire protection,police protection,health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. A minor increase in potential fire protection, emergency services, and police protection is anticipated. A fire station is located in the immediate vicinity. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None proposed. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site:electricity,natural gas,water,refuse service,telephone,sanitary sewer,cable TV, septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utilities providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Storm Sewer: City of Renton Sanitary Sewer: City of Renton Water: City of Renton Power: Puget Sound Energy Telephone: U.S. West Communications Natural Gas: Puget Sound Energy Cable TV: TCI Cablevision of Washington 6882.005 [CSF/els] EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there by any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: Name Printed: CAS S. p 6882.005 [CSF/els] VELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION WA'VER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS LAND USE PERMIT SUBMITTAL WAIVED MODIFIED COMMENTS: REQUIREMENTS: BY: BY: Calculations, Survey, Drainage Control Plan 2 Drainage Report 2 Elevations, Architectural 3 AND 4 Elevations, Grading 2 Existing Covenants (Recorded Copy)4 Existing Easements (Recorded Copy) 4 Flood Plain Map, if applicable4 Floor Plans 3AND4 • Geotechnical Report2AND3 Grading Plan, Conceptual 2 Grading Plan, Detailed 2 King County Assessor's Map Indicating Site 4 Landscaping Plan, Conceptual,' Legal Description 4 List of Surrounding Property Owners 4 Mailing Labels for Property Owners 4 Map of Existing Site Conditions 4 Master Application Form 4 Monument Cards (one,per monument) , Parking, Lot Coverage & Landscaping Analysis 4 Plan Reductions (PMTs)4 Postage 4 Public Works Approval Letter 2 Title Report or Plat Certificate 4 Topography Map (5' contours)3 Traffic Study 2 Tree CuttingNegetation Clearing Plan 4 Utilities Plan, Generalized 2 Wetlands Delineation Map4 Wetlands Planting Plan 4 Wetlands Study 4 This requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services Section PROJECT NAME: (401-0 D 50(TES LUTE 2. Public Works Plan Review Section ( 3. Building Section DATE: M4 C 4. Development Planning Section h:\division.s\develop.ser\dev.plan.ing\waiver.xls WALL DISPLAY(TRANSLUCENT VINYL FACES) 1"TRIM CAP 15 18 T \\ 28V2" 221/2" 8' t = 1 .,..c.—: ``: 12 9,e 16'-6" I-11"— ELECTRICAL DISCONNECT SWITCHES FRONT VIEW SIDE VIEW CANDLEWOOD WALL DISPLAY CHANNEL LETTERS "SUITES"CABINET •5"DEEP.063 ALUMINUM LETTERS. •INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED,RETAINERLESS,BLEED FACE CABINET. •3/16"#2447 MILKY WHITE PLEXIGLAS FACES. •121/z"(H)x 16.—6"(W)x 11"(D). •1"DARK BRONZE TRIM CAP TO MATCH JEWELITE#313 DURANODIC BRONZE. •SUBSTRATE FOR THE HEAT—TRANSFERRED FACE IS SIGNTECH FLEXFACE. •FACES ARE COVERED IN 3M TRANSLUCENT VINYL#3630-49 BURGUNDY. BACKGROUND COLOR IS SIGNTECH#2114 BLUE WITH#CC2-128 CANDLEWOOD •THE DOUBLE"O"S ARE COVERED WITH A COMBINATION OF 3M TRANSLUCENT CUSTOM CREAM HEAT-TRANSFERRED COPY. VINYLS:#3630.49 BURGUNDY,#3630-36 BLUE AND#3630-141 GOLD NUGGET. •RETURN OF THIS CABINET TO MATCH BUILDING WALL COLOR. •ILLUMINATION PROVIDED BY15mm 6500 WHITE NEON TUBING ON 30 MA TRANSFORMERS. •GLASSKOTE FX TOP COATING IS REQUIRED. •LETTERS ARE MOUNTED ON AN 8"(H)x 8"(D)x 16'-6"(L)ALUMINUM RACEWAY •FLUORESCENT LAMPS ARE USED TO PROVIDE CONSISTENT ILLUMINATION. WITH ACCESS THROUGH CONTINUOUS REMOVABLE TOP. •ELECTRICAL DISCONNECT SWITCH WITH 110 VOLT WIRING,PREWIRED. •RACEWAY AND RETURNS ARE PAINTED TO MATCH THE WALL COLOR. •5.6 AMPS/110 VOLTS. •ELECTRICAL DISCONNECT SWITCH WITH 110 VOLT WIRING,PREWIRED. •U.L.LABEL REQUIRED. •5.7 AMPS/110 VOLTS. •U.L.LABEL REQUIRED. DESIGN NO. JM-06868 DATE 6/11/98 NOTE: SCALE 3/8"=1'-0" ARTIST CB CUSTOMER CANDLEWOOD •ANY DEVIATIONS IN COLOR OR PRODUCT MANUFACTURING WALL DISPLAY(TRANSLUCENT VINYL FACES) MUST BE APPROVED BY MARKETING DEPT.,CANDLEWOOD APPROVED DATE HOTEL COMPANY,INC. •ANY PRODUCT MANUFACTURED BY A MANUFACTURER OTHER THIS DESIGN IS THE PROPERTY OF LUMINOUS NEON,INC.,RIGHTS ARE TRANSFERRED THAN APPROVED,LICENSED MANUFACTURER WILL BE INSPECTED TO THE CUSTOMER UPON COMPLETION OF AN ORDER,THIS DESIGN ISNOT TO BE BY CANDLEWOOD AND DEFICIENCIES TO STANDARDS MUST BE USED IN WHOLE OR IN PART WRHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF THE CO. CORRECTED BY FRANCHISEE AT HIS/HER EXPENSE. LUMINOUS NEON, INC. P.O BOX 916 HUTCHINSON, KS 67504 31 6-662-2363 DOUBLE FACED, INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED MONUMENT SIGN 6'-2"(H) x 10'-0"(W) x 8'-2" OVERALL HEIGHT CABINET: MONUMENT SIGN(FLEX FACE) •6'-2"(H)x 10'-0"(W)x 18"(D)• 1o'-0^ •21/2"RETAINERS. •ALUMINUM, PAINTED AKZO GRIP GUARD#181-C-5. I 9•-0 I-6 •SUBSTRATE FOR THE HEAT-TRANSFERRED FACES IS SIGNTECH FLEXFACE. , ` T- �- �- •BACKGROUND IS#2114 BLUE. 3-COLOR // `, , GRAPHICS USING SIGNTECH#CC2-128 �` _ 6. CANDLEWOOD CUSTOM CREAM �`' #9-039-1 GOLD AND#2020 BURGUNDY. i �`\ THE BURGUNDY,WITH REVERSE COPY, 1 Es zs" IS HEAT-TRANSFERRED OVER A LAYER OF 3 CREAM TO ACHIEVE THE DESIRED SHADE. 1 •GLASSKOTE FX TOP COATING REQUIRED. •ILLUMINATION IS PROVIDED BY T FLUORESCENT LAMPS. DLEwaDD •OPTIONAL:ADDRESS NUMERALS ;; OVERALL IN 3630-36 3M BLUE VINYL. SUITES 5 •8 AMPS/110 VOLTS. •U.L. LABEL REQUIRED. Where Value6"Stays _ POLE COVER: _.:.; ,._ h- .. _. ..�: --. , V V •2'-0"(H)x 9'-0"(W)x 18"(D). -_ z-0" •ALUMINUM, PAINTED AKZO GRIP GUARD#181-C-5 SUPPORT STRUCTURE: •2- 10'-5"LENGTHS OF 3"x 3"x.250 SQUARE STEEL TUBING. •4'-6"CENTER TO CENTER. •STEEL TUBING IS SET IN CONCRETE. (REFER TO PAGE 2 OF 2) DESIGN NO. JM-06544(PAGE 1 OF 2) DATE 3/31/98 SCALE 3/8"=1'-0" ARTIST CB CUSTOMER CANDLEWOOD NOTE: MONUMENT SIGN(FLEXFACE) •ANY DEVIATIONS IN COLOR OR PRODUCT MANUFACTURING APPROVED DATE MUST BE APPROVED BY MARKETING DEPT.,CANDLEWOOD THIS DESIGN ISIHE PROPERTY OF LUMINOUS NEON,INC.RIGHTS ARE TRANSFERRED HOTEL COMPANY, INC. TO THE CUSTOMER UPON COMPLETION OF AN ORDER,THIS DESIGN IS NOT TO BE •ANY PRODUCT MANUFACTURED BY A MANUFACTURER OTHER USED IN WHOLE OR N PART W THOUTTHE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF THE CO. THAN APPROVED, LICENSED MANUFACTURER WILL BE INSPECTED LUMINOUS NEON, INC. BY CANDLEWOOD AND DEFICIENCIES TO STANDARDS MUST BE P.O BOX 91 6 CORRECTED BY FRANCHISEE AT HIS/HER EXPENSE. H UTC H I N SON, KS 67504 316-662-2363 ILLUMINATED ENTRY AWNING 15 m_ __ T 20" • l� py• _ 5 15" 1. UI T E �51,Z Tg„ t s; ' I i Y,qt.: 6" x 6"x 1/8 1• y%"J -6 a .-•/ /..v (TO GROUND '"! CORNERS OF BASE TO BE PRE-DRILLED LEVEL) ' USE 4-3/8" LAGS AND SHIELDS TO ANCHOR " I __L_-4"(H)x 9"SQUARE POST PLATE COVERS 9"x 9"x 3/8" POST PLATES NOTE: 6„ I •ANY DEVIATIONS IN COLOR OR PRODUCT MANUFACTURING MUST BE APPROVED BY MARKETING DEPT.,CANDLEWOOD CANDLEWOOD HOTEL COMPANY, INC. ENTRY AWNING •ANY PRODUCT MANUFACTURED BY A MANUFACTURER OTHER •COMPLETELY ASSEMBLED,READY TO INSTALL AT SITE. THAN APPROVED,LICENSED MANUFACTURER WILL BE INSPECTED •5'(H)x 15'+/-(W)x 7'PROJECTION.(ACTUAL WIDTH MUST BE FIELD VERIFIED.) BY CANDLEWOOD AND DEFICIENCIES TO STANDARDS MUST BE •WELDED ALUMINUM FRAME PAINTED WHITE,COVERED WITH SIGNTECH FLEXFACE. CORRECTED BY FRANCHISEE AT HIS/HER EXPENSE. •BACKGROUND AND TOP ARE#2114 BLUE HEAT-TRANSFERRED MATERIAL. •SUPER GLASSKOTE TOP COATING REQUIRED.WHITE UNISHADE OPAQUE FABRIC BACK. DESIGN NO. JM-06545(PAGE 1 OF 2) DATE 3/31/98 •3-COLOR HEAT-TRANSFERRED GRAPHICS IN A COMBINATION OF THESE COLORS: SCALE 1/2"=1'-0" ARTIST CB #CC2-128 CANDLEWOOD CUSTOM CREAM,#9-039-1 GOLD AND#2020 BURGUNDY. CUSTOMER CANDLEWOOD THE BURGUNDY,WITH REVERSE COPY,IS HEAT TRANSFERRED OVER A LAYER OF CREAM TO ACHIEVE THE DESIRED SHADE. ILLUMINATED ENTRY AWNING •3 ROWS OF DOUBLE TUBE ALUMINUM-BODIED LIGHT FIXTURES WITH U.L.LABEL,DESIGNATED FOR DAMP LOCATIONS. APPROVED DATE •WHITE ALUMINUM EGGCRATE CUT TO FIT AND INSTALLED IN ENTIRE BOTTOM. •"NOTCHED"AREA ON BACK OF AWNING ALLOWS FOR CLEARANCE OF THE PTAC UNIT ABOVE THE DOOR. THIS DESIGN IS THE PROPERTY OF LUMINOUS NEON,INC.,RIGHTS ARE TRANSFERRED •2-7'-9"(H)x 6"SQUARE x 1/e"SUPPORT POSTS ARE PAINTED AKZO GRIP GUARD#181-C-5. TO THE CUSTOMER UPON COMPLETION OF AN ORDER,THIS DESIGN IS NOT TO SE •4"(H)x 9"(W)x 9"(D)ALUMINUM POST PLATE COVERS ARE PAINTED AKZO GRIP GUARD#181-C-5. USED IN WHOLE OR IN PART WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF THE CO - •Z CLIPS ARE USED FOR INSTALLATION. .W T A I�®�� ��+®�� INCe •PERMA-SEAL IS TO BE APPLIED ALONG REAR EDGE OF AWNING TO MAKE INSTALLATION WATER-TIGHT. P.O BOX 91 6 •ELECTRICAL LOAD REQUIREMENTS:6.4 AMPS/110 VOLTS •TOP OF REAR TRUSS SLOPES 1"FROM CENTER FOR WATER DRAINAGE. H UTC H I N SON, KS 67504 316-662-2363 POLE SIGN(FLEXFACE) CANDLEWOOD POLE SIGN •DOUBLE FACED,INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED POLE SIGN. •8'-11"(H)x 12'(W)x 25'OVERALL HEIGHT 1-2,2"—I Z-2- I 12 CABINET: •8'-11"(H)x 12'(W)x 2'-2"(D). � I� •41/2"RETAINERS. ry _ •STEEL,PAINTED AKZO GRIP GUARD#181-C-5. 1,, •SUBSTRATE FOR THE HEAT-TRANSFERRED (101) .4... FACES IS SIGNTECH FLEXFACE. i-; •BACKGROUND IS#2114 BLUE. 3-COLOR e'-11" GRAPHICS USING SIGNTECH#CC2-128 CANDLEWOOD M CREAM, LE D #9-0 9-11 GOLD AND 0#2020 BURGUNDY. 4 SUITES j THE BURGUNDY,WITH REVERSE COPY, „ i i Where Value Stays IS HEAT-TRANSFERRED OVER A LAYER OF 7 CREAM TO ACHIEVE THE DESIRED SHADE. •GLASSKOTE FX TOP COATING REQUIRED. ( •ILLUMINATION IS PROVIDED BY {I ; FLUORESCENT LAMPS. •13 AMPS/110 VOLTS. fits, - I 26'-0' •U.L.LABEL REQUIRED. ' PTV' OVERALL I .I I POLE COVER: . 10.-10„ I •16'-1"(H)x 3'-0"(W)x 1'-6"(D). AO •ALUMINUM,PAINTED AKZO GRIBASE:GUARD#181-C-5. 5'(H)x 3(W)x 1'-6"(D). k}PSF' REVEAL 3"(H)x 2'-8"(W)x 1'-2"(D). t./. TOP 10'-10"(H)x 3'(W)x 1'-6"(D). as 1.-2"(D) ,•sic.'� 3„— 2-e„ _Ir SUPPORT STRUCTURE: REVEAL ' REVEAL •STEEL POLE SET IN CONCRETE. ;; (SEE PAGE 2 FOR BASE SPECIFICATIONS.) .,i 6'-0" NOTE: I .., •ANY DEVIATIONS IN COLOR OR PRODUCT MANUFACTURING MUST BE APPROVED BY MARKETING DEPT.,CANDLEWOOD H 3.-0"•—I HOTEL COMPANY,INC. •ANY PRODUCT MANUFACTURED BY A SIDE VIEW FRONT VIEW MANUFACTURER OTHER THAN APPROVED, LICENSED MANUFACTURER WILL BE INSPECTED BY CANDLEWOOD AND DEFICIENCIES TO STANDARDS MUST BE CORRECTED BY FRANCHISEE AT HIS/HER EXPENSE. DESIGN NO. JM-06639(PAGE 1 OF 2) DATE 4/1/98 SCALE 3/16"=1'-0' ARTIST CB CUSTOMER CANDLEWOOD POLE SIGN(FLEXFACE) APPROVED DATE THIS DESIGN IS THE PROPERTY OF LUMINOUS NEON,INC..RIGHTS ARE TRANSFERRED TO THE CUSTOMER UPON COMPLETION OF AN ORDER,THIS DESIGN IS NOT TORE USED IN WHOLE OR N PART W RHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF THE CO. LUMINOUS NEON, INC. P-O BOX 916 HUTCHINSON, KS 67504 316-662-2363 POLE SIGN(IFLEXFACE) --2-,a"--I I 15'-°" I CANDLEWOOD POLE SIGN °DOUBLE FACED,INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED POLE SIGN. °11'-11/2"(H)x 15'(W)x 35'OVERALL HEIGHT a. CABINET: ;; f ES ;) °11'-1 d/2"(H)x 15'(W)x 2'-9"(D). ' °41/2"RETAINERS. 1•` -,• 11_1Vz� °STEEL,PAINTED AKZO GRIP GUARD#181-C-5. . j•-'1., 'i•:,.,, ON Di. EMDD °SUBSTRATE FOR THE HEAT-TRANSFERRED FACES IS SIGNTECH FLEXFACE. HEAT-TRANSFERRED ` " °BACKGROUND IS#2114 BLUE. 3-COLOR ;:; i SUITES I T E S i GRAPHICS USING SIGNTECH#CC2-128 �' WFtC1'C VLyhIC Sta S CANDLEWOOD CUSTOM CREAM, t,,,i1' y #9-039-1 GOLD AND#2020 BURGUNDY. I'I THE BURGUNDY,WITH REVERSE COPY, IS HEAT-TRANSFERRED OVER A LAYER OF CREAM TO ACHIEVE THE DESIRED SHADE. f 0 GLASSKOTE FX TOP COATING REQUIRED. { r 0 ILLUMINATION IS PROVIDED BY FLUORESCENT LAMPS. , °22 AMPS/110 VOLTS. • °U.L.LABEL REQUIRED. yl 36'-0' POLE COVER: L OVERALL °23'-101/2"(H)x 4'-0°(W)x 2'-2"(D). P; °ALUMINUM,PAINTED AKZO GRIP GUARD#181-C-5. 1e-re" BASE: 5'(H)x 4'(W)x 2'-2°(D). REVEAL 3°(H)x 3'8"(W)x 1'10"(D). ,r.° Lp ,F TOP 18'-71/2"(H)x 4'(W)x 2'-2°(D). iv 1'- r ., xj A:'1sx � ,' SUPPORT STRUCTURE: ''{{''n " °STEEL POLE SET IN CONCRETE. �. ti ',. „°p (SEE PAGE 2 FOR BASE SPECIFICATIONS.) I +ask �1 f �r �M1 a i I NOTE: �,wM P, � , °ANY DEVIATIONS IN COLOR OR PRODUCT � �2,2,,� 1�{a+ *� ���"! MANUFACTURING MUST BE APPROVED VIir° ''"t?,,, BY MARKETING DEPT.,CANDLEWOOD . 1-1O"(D) -"I 3— _ r-8 (W) --I ( - HOTEL COMPANY,INC. REVEAL REVEAL -, °ANY PRODUCT MANUFACTURED BY A 2•-2" ( MANUFACTURER OTHER THAN APPROVED, A; LICENSED MANUFACTURER WILL BE 11 s'-0' 'd INSPECTED BY CANDLEWOOD AND ` LI "' \ DEFICIENCIES TO STANDARDS MUST BE 11 CORRECTED BY FRANCHISEE AT airehaniiiiiiiiiinimarmaleside 'OSCVN,dilNeasil6vlWstiOal ' = ,. ., I _,....._ s' HIS/HER EXPENSE. I E-- � a0 � SIDE VIEW FRONT VIEW DESIGN NO. JM-O6547(PAGE I OF 2) DATE 4/1/98 SCALE 3/16"=1'-0' ARTIST CB CUSTOMER CAN DLayout) POLE SIGN(FLEXFACE) APPROVED DATE THIS DESIGN IS THE PROPERTY OF LUMNOUS NEON,INC..RIGHTS ARE TRANSFERRED TO THE CUSTOMER UPON COMPLETION OF AN ORDER,THIS DESIGN IS NOT TO BE USED IN WHOLE OR IN PARTWR.IOUT THE WRITTEN PERMESION OF THE CO. . T •LYSVdINTOUS ]NPoNT, INrC. •P.O BOX 916 HUTCHINSON, KS 67504 31 6-662-2363 8c c August 5, 1998 CITY OF RENT014 Ness Holding Company MAR 01 i'�� Steve Ness RECEIVED 6645 N. Ensign Street Portland, OR 97217 RE: WETLAND EVALUATION, • PROPERTY NORTH OF SW 16TH STREET, BETWEEN PACIFIC AVENUE SW (VAC) AND THOMAS AVENUE SW (VAC) Dear Steve: The above referenced property has been evaluated for the presence of wetlands in the late winter and spring of 1998. The DOE Washington State Wetland Delineation Manual was used. The site was observed and monitored with one small area in the northwest corner of the property meeting the technical criteria of wetlands. This area should not be regulated under the City of Renton Regulations as it is a lower quality wetland less than 5,000 square feet. Further, the area meeting technical wetland criteria appears to be atop an area of old fill/disturbance and should be exempt from other regulatory jurisdiction on that basis as it may be artificial. METHODOLOGIES Methodology is based on a broad base of experience and understanding of the site, soil mapping and wetland delineation. The determination meets the current definition and criteria of wetlands commonly described as found in the 1987 Federal Manual and as established by the latest DOE Delineation Manual. The 1987 and 1989 federal methodologies of routine, atypical and disturbed situations were referenced to achieve the delineation. In addition, the USDA Soil Survey P. O. Box 1337, Gig Harbor WA 98335 USA 253.858.7055 FAX 253.858.2534 3005R/ajb/08/06/98 1 • Manual, the "USDA SCS Soil Survey of the area was used as well as the latest NHSTC Hydric Indicators. Those areas exhibiting anaerobic and saturated conditions in the upper pad for two weeks of the growing season are considered wetlands. Small isolated areas with ponding as a result of wheel compaction froth farm equipment did not qualify as a wetland when the immediate surrounding area did not meet wetland criteria. • SOIL WATER MONITORING TECHNIQUES To understand seasonal soil water relations appropriate data collection and monitoring procedures are required. Background data collection consists of soil morphology including redoximorphic features, depositional environment, and landfornIs for accurate soil water assessment. A prove techniques for determining the location of soil water levels involves careful planning. Measuring soil temperature at 19.6 inches establishes the period at which 41°F or 5°C is exceeded. This is the temperature threshold for microbial activity to begin. The various microbes are essential to the process of iron and manganese reduction chemistry. In other words formation of redoximorphic features. Many western Washington soils exhibit high soil water levels during the non-growing winter season. The field is monitored in the winter for advent of the growing season. Soil temperatures will likely rise and stayed above 41° F at 19.6 inches on or about March 1 , thus beginning the growing season and routine water table monitoring. The water table monitoring will establish and verify a wetland determination based on monitored soil water conditions. Soil terr perature and soil water level measurements are accurately obtained in random y located soil auger bore holes. Soil morphology including redoximorphic features is recorded at each permanent station along with the soil water levels and soil temperatures. The various strata (layers) of the depositional environment affects soil water movement and is recognized. Landform(s) and soil lanc scape age provide significant data associated with accurate soil water assessment. Measuring bore holes is repeated in the near vicinity each time but utilizing a fresh bore hole. When soil water is present the equilibration period must take into account surface water or rainwater as they may produce erroneous data. Piezometers are not used in these soil conditions due to the risk of installation failure is high. 3005R/ajb/08/06/98 2 Finally, soil water assessment techniques on this site are complicated and required a high degree of expertise and experience in order to insure valid monitoring and interpretation. The monitoring by Registered Professional and Certified Professional Soil,Scientists trained in soil physic, hydrology monitoring, soil morphology, agricultural drainage, agronomy, soil mapping, and geomorphology ensure accuracy of the results. Proper interpretation of the data and results is likely to only be done by those with similar backgrounds. Soil Investigation Five plots for the evaluation of wetlands were established on January 7, 1998. The five plots were representatively located across the site with Plot #5 in the lowest position in the landscape, which is the center of the area delineated. Soil logs were taken at each of the locations. The soil investigation found the a typical profile on the property had approximately 4 inches of a dark brown silt loam over a brown silt loam to 8 or 13 inches. Below this, the soils appeared to be either dark grayish brown or grayish brown very fine sandy loam to silt loam to about 25 inches. The site had evidence of some disturbance, but the horizonation tended to be natural. The exception is test hole #5, it had evidence of disturbance. Vegetation Vegetation of the site is a regrowth after the historic disturbance. The forested canopy of the site is made up of red alder, black cottonwood, pacific willow and scattered Oregon ash. The scrub/shrub canopy is dominated by red dogwood, snowberry, and spirea. The herbaceous canopy is made up of reed canarygrass, and creeping buttercup with scattered sedges, soft rush and lady fern. The vine canopy is dominated by Himalayan blackberry and morning glory. Hydrology The five test plots were monitored for hydrology. The monitoring locations were observed on approximately 10-day intervals from late February until late April. In no instance was a water table or saturation in the upper part noticed in any of the holes. The area delineated as a wetland did have ponding for approximately the first 2.5 weeks of March; however, there was no water table nor saturated soils before or after this period. The wetland delineation is based solely on the surface water in the excavated and filled area in the northwest corner of the property. 3005R/ajb/08/06/98 3 Regulated Wetlands Lower quality wetlands less than 5,000 square feet are exempt from regulations. These ere low quality wetlands as stated under Section 4-32-3D3.a.(1) These wetlands are characterized by hydrologic isolation with the only hydrologic connection being the drainage ditch along Interstate 405. (2) The soils have been altered as the area delineated has be excavated and backfilled. B. (1 ) The area delineated as a wetland is an excavated area that has been refilled, therefore there is a wetland occurring on top of fill, possibly and (2) the wetland is characterized by emergent vegetation consisting of willows and red dogwoods overhanging from the margins into the delineated area with practically no vegetation growing in the delineated area. If the wetland does not qualify as a low quality wetland through its connection along the ditch of 1-405, it would only be a Category II wetland and it is less than 2,200 square feet, being approximately 1,800 square feet. Proposed Activities and Impacts At the tine of the preparation of this report, a site plan had not been formalized. It is understood that the intent will be to grade and clear the site with the eventual construction of a building and associated parking areas. Whereas, the wetland is not regt.lated by the City of Renton, there are no applicable buffers or needs for additional mitigation. If the city's requirements have changed such that some mitigation is required, this will be done through mitigation banking or similar activity if necessary. We will wait on the city's response with regard to additional agency involvement. Si e i, A. . redber 3005R/ajt/08/06/98 4 , TABLE 1 MONITORING RESULTS Depth to water table in inches Date 1 2 3 4 5 1/7 44" 43" 40" None to 44" 28" 2/19 No water to 24" 43" 40" None to 44" 28" 3;/3 No water to 24" 43" 40" None to 44" Flooded 3/13 No water to 24" 43" 40" None to 44" Flooded 3/26 No water to 24" 43" 40" None to 44" No water to 24" 4/9 No water to 24" 43" 40" None to 44" No water to 24" 4/23 No water to 24" 43" 40" None to 44" No water to 24" 3005R/aj-/08/06/98 Or r ► � 4 SW 16th ST. SITE 0 - Q rr VICINITY MAP FIGURE 1 : VICINITY MAP NESS HOLDING COMPANY SW 16TH STREET B&A, INC. #3005 i I --- -.J— 1166 1169 f 60 WOOD j f '1 40 I _1 FENCE 1 11 I115 I ' 177i/ i i I �I d ^ I I 1 I % U 1 �/ 'd 172 Q • 64a3 _ y • > . Cn 2 I I I ,6 4 / /) . 18.5 J v J I I I. 16.3 I Liz 117.0� ° • I >` y I =W •W SCALE: 1" = 40' I w Ir \ I 1 ^ co mW /Q I U Y 0 I _ • rn w-1 Q tV =m ( ) I Ln U — — — • — 17.7 CD Q I 0 } 1 Q • I ¢ Q I " 4 1d. FD w a. t- 1,dz 1 i 1u I � oW 1 w Q u- I x 1 I n.a� 16f� ,az 1 4___ -i,• — (.9 to CH. UNK I\ !`S6. 15.4 I Z - F=- +d2 Q ,d3 / 1 I _J0 : I I / o / las I w 5- x x 1 1 �/ I k0 U cn Z 1 /1 1 18.8 N Z 16.4I I j 16.1 116.0 W Q l8i I 40 °_L CO 1 196 17 11 � 19 i 1 60 u_ I / 1`1, 1 TOE- I I - '°.6 .�.7/ , 191,38.8 389.69' -�;---- 1 r� `-� `„ , , i121.0 6120..69. 21.0 i TOP 2o.e T o 00511NC ----------------------?i SS►1H ‘i — RIM EL 21.4 ) -' E>aS - 20.9 LE. .. 5.9 CATCH B. RIM. EL : EXISTING O 24- I.E. - ' CATCH BASIN r7 - _ •— — — — — — RIM EL 20.4 5 U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE 1??°15' ` �7oy�, r .. ^� R.4 E. R.5 E. SEATTLE(C/Tv P 0.)to MI.112'30" .H,. • �:-, .• I ..``�BIN Ma�-r—gal I • . „ v .� �f '",s{ �-=, I % I. % 'Su,r-. ,;. NUS', 1 . % .►h r .: IY11.*1-i ifi-i-• >,: --.... 'I li 'i,L.!,i 1.';:i .•-:ail./.--A'.• 7 6 \k.,,..:•• %till :*4: ,31 r • a .• I ° '4'L! .i j}��I--- __ ',/r .1 ai.':6ye kanillii • Bin River •• .,I, ;: I j '— . T'' E i ..c.:,....(s.....•.......!...:.<•-k.l.\ •,z. :1-- ......: "----v=--- .\.•wu \wst,-- • :(: _ NIB ' • a hthletlI r • J ! :• ucsca�. 8M' 'l � �t�o field ��� atil __________ . :.• N s ...I tiliga r .4441.1 .4. ... I .___••• ::Z.,•,:.:. . •:•-•'. TI...... . '.• . .. 11! :•,/Be&lett _ .4 ' ‘‘ %. .2;44. N N 4:: it 9001 , litt, 9M'. • ti :�.' +•-T.c�.. — 0 ��4Y10MKL 1 �.� I • ` •• • ••-,• . i •+ •.. ? °..ice - r�i• , aI �I 254 rra •I • •' ~* 1 ^`'1 I ' '- -0r�_ j :Y',...1. rr!: 1W .. I.---; i : . ..." • „I' • , DTI ` fb V. " - .--Ilig .....a.C. . 5 •g A • ` ®, �` :--•ttic .�,` ".;• _ ,`: �: ,s.p.•••• . i„...i-........TL___-leas,Ilk C I \II'filo? 13 I i• l 8 \ I 1 I Golf Crourse4,t I i " i y�it3` el WO�� �` r I pA~�F_ j I =I I BM A / Q r� I i • '.I �1• s 4 139 .�1 t 11 $ew Qe C,, N E ;'.:, err■ . ; ,� ,at : �; OISP• al S !" .• 1 1 .,4A •I',:.'i.1- • :- I i':, _ I� •Irfor Al• .W� , _ I Ur '•. .�, .1 �� :LongacreS �I .Pu • 'I'R..i • •I • i L.i / •Mil • (I R•Acf^1 I•. '.:' '_. • Ii I;,i1' )OS • II ;Ur •\.p1 _ _ 1''in I 44 Ur .= I Wo. :e0 mi , _ -.i, •' '' ' L..... Track �I r� I 'F-N li 7: Alai ��• /..i• I �;.g,.. �0 ,• 1q -,A11V t n•i 1 1 29T. ' :;" e _----- : )l • 210 • :> . 97' I _ •i R ` Illrvolr �1•�. Sk �''^rr. wo • • M.• • I . • • FIGURE 3: KING COUNTY SOIL SURVE ( '...:.. ,C ?; NESS HOLDING COMPANY ?\. 16G • Pm. BM;«:'kw \ 203? - S'N 16TH STREET 5jp) 1.�y h -T:1 .. . „ ..- - -- Ski -. 'trr, DATA FORM 1 Routine Wetland Determination , (WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or 1987 Corps Wetland Delineation Manual) Project/Site: rcw /6 tit /Q 0 14.-..! Date: / /7 l9 8 , Applicant/owner: /(/e i s //' /d t „J� C e County: -,v State: 4,4 -g Investigator(s): 2 C. it- $ A Q 5IT/R: 2.iiZ..2 3 /Y g Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? �J no Community : Is the site significantly disturbed(atypical situation)? es no Transect ID: �� 1 Is the area a potential Problem Area? yes Plot ID: VEGETATION _ Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator R.� . ,4Id -e r- S4,p r,4-� C ' k- moo, d SA.? F (-w Pee-1 S 41q ret45 a G 4c • HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: %of dominants OBL,FACW, &FAC: 75 Check all indicators that apply&explain below: • Regional knowledge of plant communities Wetland plant list(nat'1 or regional) ✓ OTHER Physiological or reproductive adaptations Morphological adaptations Technical Literature Wetland Plant Data Base • Hydrophytic vegetation present? yes no • Rationale for decision/Remarks: HYDROLOGY Is it the growing season? yes 8 Water Marks: yes no Sediment Deposits: yes no Based on: etcde— , /e io Drift Lines: yes no Drainage Patterns: yes no Dept. of inundation: inches Oxidized Root(live roots) Local Soil Survey: yes no Channels <12 in.yes no Depth to free water in pit: inches FAC Neutral: yes no Water-stained } elLeaves: yes no Depth to saturated soil: -Z(( inches Check all that apply &explain below: Other. Stream,Lake or gage data: Aerial photographs: Other: Wetland hydrology present? yes no Rationale for decision/Remarks: • JU 5 SOILS Map Unit Name 5- 44.Net.•✓ Drainage Class Mo ck W¢- t( (Series & Phase) :.. Field observations confirm alp No Taxonomy (subgroup) mapped type? Profile Description Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors Mottle abundance Texture,concretions, Drawing of soil (inches) (Munsell (Munsell size&contrast structure,etc. profile moist) moist) (match description) D y 4 A (o YR3l �� Yes'3 7�sYR G I i ,•.asso s 5-16 61 'z1' 3� S�'uIz /4- c • Yo C. s Yf 2 1 I /Yj r d .v-(Sc. Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) Histosol Concretions Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other(explain in remarks) Hydric soils present? yes 15 Rationale for decision/Remarks: Z k$ /a At CJ(f o a w Wetland Determination(circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? es no Hydric soils present? yes Is the sampling point yes Wetland hydrology present? yes within a wetland? Rationale/Remarks: • NOTES: DATA FORM 1 •1 Routine Wetland Determination , (WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or 1987 Corps Wetland Delineation Manual) Project/Site: rcw /63 ell f012,,,io-./ Date: / /7 l 9 8 Applicant/owner. de i S /70 /a c f. 1-C o , County: ,/g J State: 4�4 / Investigator(s): k 6 14- $ A a _ S/T/R: / .2 3•!// y g _ Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? (yd..) no Community 1 ((( Is the site significantly disturbed(atypical situation)? no Transect ID: 7zz Is the area a potential Problem Area? yes CP _Plot ID: VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Pcc A fI Qr s,q 6�C co o,,/ (.0eccl F.¢C w �. 86c i4l� U V �P.` f5 c- 4-4 1 er.-) Al C tii. Qu, cktc 4 .. K% it)HYDROPHYTIC VE(ETATION INDICATORS: %of dominants OBL,FACW, &FAC: 6 0 Check all indicators that apply&explain below: Regional knowledge of plant communities Wetland plant list(nat'I or regional) cJ OTHER Physiological or reproductive adaptations Morphological adaptations Technical Literature Wetland Plant Data Base Hydrophytic vegetation present? . no Rationale for decision/Remarks: HYDROLOGY Is it the growing season? ir yesC Water Marks: yes no Sediment Deposits: yes no Based on: d0-e- Drift Lines: yes no Drainage Patterns: yes no Dept. of inundation: inches Oxidized Root(live roots) Local Soil Survey: yes no Channels <12 in. yes no Depth to free water in pit: inches FAC Neutral: yes no Water-stained �/ Leaves: yes no Depth to saturated soil: /2 f inches Check all that apply &explain below: Other. Stream, Lake or gage data: Aerial photographs: Other: Wetland hydrology present? yes e Rationale for decision/Remarks: /U s5 SOILS - .:_Map Unit Name c� /4 AJ/t ( 4 Drainage Class a Ls e- G ovI J (Series & Phase) i., , Field observations confirm No Taxonomy (subgroup) mapped type? Profile Description Depth 'Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors Mottle abundance Texture, concretions, Drawing of soil (inches) (Munsell (Munsell size&contrast structure,etc. profile moist) moist) (match description) °— I A 10.t 2 3t3 2:5: s, 1. `I- $3 4g /or, Y(3 < < 2 6 ?, 5 i'fr/ ')"syR5/ I D 12-50 B1 566 yfz 'A VC -Y5-1- G 5-8& V/ it /1 IS 11 Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) Histosol Concretions _ Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils - Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List Gleyed or Low-Chromaro� Colors Other(explain in remarks) Hydric soils present? ( no Rationale for decision/Remarks: ��� �� /..`,,!L "" 4.,/h C/ oZ ' I Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? a no ` Hydric soils present? no Is the sampling point yes no Wetland hydrology present? yes 6: within a wetland? • Rationale/Remarks: NOTES: DATA FORM 1 Routine Wetland Determination , (WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or 1987 Corps Wetland Delineation Manual) Project/Site: w l6 to l -a eon/ Date: / / l 9 8 Applicant/owner: ile S S /f p l d c ,-' (a , County: -,erg J State: 4/4 / Investigator(s): k $ /-A r a S/T/R: 2.e/ a 3�// t/Er Do Normal Circumstancesexist on the site? (y) no Community f: (( Is the site significantly disturbed(atypical situation)? �j no Transect ID: 7� 3 Is the area a potential Problem Area? yes Plot ID: VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator / Pe 'V /0 e!' .5. F4 G Q-, ge 4 p #r r4 L,, iT"vdv GJoa d if 6G Rec d -ftTry it /,mow S,vp w 4fi.eirl S/-/ / 4ew hF=/?,. 6 L 4erpe tl j PAct✓ _ HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: %of dominants OBL,FACW, &FAC: Check all indicators that apply&explain below: Regional knowledge of plant communities Wetland plant list(nat'I or regional) e/ OTHER Physiological or reproductive adaptations Morphological adaptations Technical Literature Wetland Plant Data Base Hydrophytic vegetation present? Or.....s no Rationale for decision/Remarks: HYDROLOGY Is it the growing season? yes 6:1 Water Marks: yes no Sediment Deposits: yes no Based on: Drift Lines: yes no Drainage Patterns: yes no Dept. of inundation: inches Oxidized Root(live roots) Local Soil Survey: yes no Channels<12 in. yes no Depth to free water in pit: inches FAC Neutral: yes no Water-stained 4 Leaves: yes no Depth to saturated soil: ,eZc[ inches Check all that apply &explain below: Other: Stream, Lake or gage data: Aerial photographs: Other: Wetland hydrology present? yes no Rationale for decision/Remarks: Ale.ss SOILS 1 Map Unit Name 5ei /I Drainage Class P14° 1 /4 L/( (Series &Phase) . , Field observations confirm ED No _, Taxonomy (subgroup) mapped type? Profile Description Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors Mottle abundance Texture,concretions, Drawing of soil (inches) (Munsell (Munsell size&contrast structure,etc. profile moist) moist) (match description) 0.— A lIre3/3 s; 4 5 q 4 6 brk ylS , . 1_17) g /(>/' ft, ��sYR-s-/4 -/) I' I z,, E5 2 1' 12 1 / n4/d V-ikL -2 ki-Iti- 0._ g,751( ,t ne/j L'PS Z- Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) Histosol Concretions Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List Gleyed or Low-Chroma C lors Other(explain in remarks) Hydric soils present? yes no Rationale Rationale for decision/Remarks: 1-6- -C S !;-/ (: Ge4 vd-S Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? no Hydric soils present? yes (9 Is the sampling point yes Wetland hydrology present? yes 6 within a wetland? Rationale/Remarks: NOTES: DATA FORM 1 Routine Wetland Determination 1, (WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or 1987 Corps Wetland Delineation Manual) Project/Site: r'w l6 fit (paN 1o.,/ Date: / / /9 , ` U Applicant/owner: /t/e iS /1D l d c �!Gt Co , County: �-fig - J State: 4J4 Investigator(s): Q ( 4 if S Q STrIR: 2,e7 / -2 3 /y 5 Do Normal.Circumstances exist on the site? (y no Community lDj Is the site significantly disturbed(atypical situation)? �cs�' no Transect ID: / a Y Is the area a potential Problem Area? yes (ni) Plot ID: VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator k,d Al i e, , ,, N6 . Pf-i W6 itfl • HYDROPHYTTC VEGETATION INDICATORS: %of dominants OBL,FACW, &FAC: /D O Check all indicators that apply&explain below: Regional knowledge of plant communities Wetland plant list(nat'l or regional) •`_ OTHER Physiological or reproductive adaptations Morphological adaptations Technical Literature Wetland Plant Data Base • IffHydrophytic vegetation present? no • Rationale for decision/Remarks: HYDROLOGY Is it the growing season? yes no yes Water Marks: yes no Sediment Deposits: yes no Based on: Uk�L Drift Lines: yes no Drainage Patterns: yes no Dept. of inundation: inches Oxidized Root(live roots) Local Soil Survey: yes no Channels<12 in. yes no Depth to free water in pit: inches FAC Neutral: yes no Water-stained 4Leaves: yes no Depth to saturated soil: >2 � inches _ Check all that apply &explain below: Other. Stream, Lake or gage data: Aerial photographs: Other: Wetland hydrology present? yes no Rationale for decision/Remarks: iU�ss SOILS Map Unit Name $eiJi`l 44-,"\ Drainage Class Abe) r (Series & Phase) Field observations confirm No Taxonomy (subgroup) mapped type? Profile Description Depth - Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors Mottle abundance Texture,concretions, Drawing of soil (inches) (Munsell (Munsell size&contrast structure, etc. profile moist) moist) (match description) Os- A t12.313 L G -25 6 z,g-��/j ?• 5`(Kt-/,/1'l fA 5, -4 25=v `N M 4SESL Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) Histosol Concretions Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils Th Sulfidic Odor Q organic Streaking in Sandy Soils Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other(explain in remarks) Hydric soils present? es no Rationale for decision/Remark : Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? es no Hydric soils present? no Is the sampling point yes Wetland hydrology present? yes 6i) within a wetland? Rationale/Remarks: v • NOTES: DATA FORM 1 Routine Wetland Determination (WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or 1987 Corps Wetland Delineation Manual) Project/Site: w �(� fff < 1�J2 Date: / /7 f 1 S Applicant/owner: de SS /7/0 I d i ,/Gt C o County: 1-,4/g,' - J State: &' Investigator(s): e 'L 4 4 A S Q S/T/R: �1- /�/g Do NormakCircumstances exist on the site? Cy� no Community ID: r Is the site significantly disturbed(atypical situation)? no Transect ID: ‹e(y Is the area a potential Problem Area? yes � Plot ID: VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Re- L42td S.9 HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: %of dominants OBL,FACW, &FAC: 66, Check all indicators that apply&explain below: • Regional knowledge of plant communities Wetland plant list(nat'l or regional) ✓ OTHER Physiological or reproductive adaptations Morphological adaptations Technical Literature d� Wetland Plant Data Base • Hydrophytic vegetation present? rio Rationale for decision/Remarks: HYDROLOGY Is it the growing season? yes Water Marks: yes no Sediment Deposits: yes no Based on: Drift Lines: yes no Drainage Patterns: yes no Dept. of inundation: inches Oxidized Root(live roots) Local Soil Survey: yes no Channels <12 in. yes no Depth to free water in pit: inches FAC Neutral: yes no Water-stained Leaves: yes no Depth to saturated soil: "7 2-41 inches Check all that apply &explain below: Other. Stream,Lake or gage data: Aerial photographs: Other: Wetland hydrology present? yes no Rationale for decision/Remarks: • iU�ss SOILS MapUnit Name Se-t,/q�G.v A l�'� y� Gt6G 4 l� ! � u� Drainage Class /'Lo � �/ (Series &Phase) Field observations confirm No Taxonomy (subgroup) mapped type? Profile Description Depth 'Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors Mottle abundance Texture, concretions, Drawing of soil (inches) (Munsell (Munsell size&contrast structure,etc. profile moist) moist) _ (match description) b -6 A- 1-07k3/3 S,• 4 �SY41 9' 5"7e3/ M t S� 5 4K sYs/1 s pkslt 3 Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) • Histosol Concretions Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils Th Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other(explain in remarks) Hydric soils present? �e ` /j io � "r Rationale for decision/Remarks:vl U' 3 ,rS, q • Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? no Hydric soils present? x no Is the sampling point yes ZY Wetland hydrology present? yes no within a wetland? Rationale/Remarks: NOTES: DATA FORM 1 Routine Wetland Determination (WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or 1987 Corps Wetland Delineation Manual), Project/Site: rS u /6 tit /P o../ Date: / /7 / Applicant/owner: /1/e s S //Old c ,✓Gt C a County: �-,v - J State: w,y .g Investigator(s): e 1 A Q S/T/R: zY ,2 Do Normal-Circumstances exist on the site? (y s no Community tD Is the site significantly disturbed(atypical situation)? �es� no Transect ID: r/{ Is the area a potential Problem Area? yes () Plot ID: VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator CJ<<lo w -5410 6,4 1.1. woo 54, c' • HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: %of dominants OBL,FACW, &FAC: ! 0 v Check all indicators that apply &explain below: Regional knowledge of plant communities Wetland plant list(nat'1 or regional) OTHER Physiological or reproductive adaptations Morphological adaptations Technical Literature Wetland Plant Data Base Hydrophytic vegetation present? e no Rationale for decision/Remarks: HYDROLOGY Is it the growing season? no Water Marks: yes no Sediment Deposits: yes no Based on: Drift Lines: yes no Drainage Patterns: yes no Dept. of inundation: S Z inches r Oxidized Root(live roots) Local Soil Survey: yes no Channels <12 in. yes no Depth to free water in pit: inches"2 eQ (4 FAC Neutral: yes no Water-stained Leaves: yes no Depth to saturated soil: inches Check all that apply &explain below: Other. Stream, Lake or gage data: Aerial photographs: Other: Wetland hydrology present? no Rationale for decision/Remarks: Vess SOILS Map Unit Name Drainage Class (Series &Phase) Field observations confirm Yes No •_, Taxonomy (subgroup) mapped type? Profile Description Depth .Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors Mottle abundance Texture, concretions, Drawing of soil (inches) (Munsell (Munsell size&contrast structure,etc. profile moist) moist) (match description) "3 lurk 3/2 S.L 3- o 4- /vyi?3/3 5 ,•L �" /12 2 i/3 /vtizSI/ d��eit,e.� Kok 5 . 1,5'e VC Fes.fs,s s�`�. • • Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) Histosol Concretions Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other(explain in remarks) Hydric soils present? � � �/ Rationale for decision/Remarks I6. r�,(/���c r'f poi ,( cjr�c_ cj Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? yes no Hydric soils present? yes no Is the sampling point tab no Wetland hydrology present? yes no within a wetland? Rationale/Remarks: • NOTES: 14" •�� Earth Consultants Inc. (tip 01 L ngi11(Y'rs.Geologists&lEnvironineullill Scientists February 25, 1999 • E-8648 Barghausen Consulting Engineers 18215 - 72nd Avenue South Kent, Washington 98032 Attention: Dan Balmelli Subject: Proposed Candlewood Hotel Renton, Washington Dear Dan: In accordance with your request, we are in the process of preparing a geotechnical engineering study for the subject project. Our field exploration is currently scheduled for March 1 , 1999. Based on our experience in the immediate vicinity of the site, we anticipate the site is underlain by loose, alluvial soils which are highly compressible to depths of about thirty (30) feet below the existing grades. The compressible material is likely underlain by medium dense to dense, sand and gravel. Based on these soil conditions, the hotel building should be supported on a pile foundation system bearing in the sands and gravels below the compressible soils. Other similar structures in the general area of the site have similar foundation systems. Specific recommendations regarding the foundation system and other geotechnical issues affecting the project will be presented in our geotechnical engineering study. We anticipate completion of our study by mid March. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service on this project. Should you have any questions or need additional information, please contact us. Yours very truly, MENT EARTH CONSULTANTS, INC. CIN OF R 1�1Lfro` MAR01 � RECO NI Kyle R. Campbell, P.E. Manager of Geotechnical Services • KRCIbkm 1805-136th Place N.E.,Suite 201,Bellevue,Washington 98005 Bellevue(425)643-3780 FAX(425)746-0860 Toll Free(888)739-6670 `River` •�% t -1. • • ' A R 0 ` •.', . :-••.' lb% _ Ai I totth, ... \ j'illiVr /. .• r: ----.-.--vz_ 4.•,-. . p � s `• 11�I '� Athleti �� 4�—�;. ,/� yam )�L �� � 'c� field ,,"El il, �/ • /,!, , I • Air pur �� 1.1- Iil mo. BM2Lii EsiC .. . . .. .,. ... ...ifit-7:i\N rirl--1 ‘ • =asebatt/.1,11pP"--/ ./4#\/ �' CNn y 254 ---7410 Park \ `GRAVE ri.. 1 . .. ... .. . w;:kt._:„.......„__,, _.. k IN .,.., T. 6 tig Rigallilit _ \ `_4-(' ' ii‘.° / \CI tSIIP:Mit � � \ fli --- il.I.. r-Vi.•WWI ill=!= ... Al. .. --.., $ RF.p ROAD Tu \ \`� � �\ /�'• „--rill Ea, . � \.'q • I , )G 0 0:9 - v"'" ?,pgoe`` i •—��gt �� 1II't�1liii.�l \+ , \i Wo R ( , !„I1II rcc IF\ AkF I� wo AL! M -1111111e4 .4. .: • !•: / _j/_.: I . :P\ .,. i ; Pu1 py �•, I e ii. • ==ram` qgC BM137.- - Golf�ourse ■ ! I� ��I—� AmC •�, 1 It PA IFS 4 ;�'' f_LI 1;-• '410 : \ .:4-'; 1<)� e, I� �•,'. � ,�1 �d�� r. , 1 � � •, I �� .� '�_•_�__•� '� GHQ•^`6� 41�•\\- � ` `��� ��--'- --+\- _ram 'A6C Substa�� ::\• I . Ng 1411r7,!, ....-- is _ ����i �\ s1 .. . • 4rowiuwgorlige .'•ialr 5. • '° !1h /4(...AgD zoiiii-'4,•4 , �� ir4' :M 16 Pu � �' III \I,,•Lpr'''-pr'° ' .' �v ice ••` Ur �•• --- ••I I ?' • ��tf Pu •F 1I 1� tLongaaei p E •�• \ , @, , / ?,, ••G �.4 R �� •u' 4BeC \ r Uri �d� i Wo w •n ,i c 1 ' _ -'I ;_, Ur a.� U •It • 'ii• :ii:,1• I I AgD I I `,�• �( ' 1 Track ',•� •N. — _ 1_• •'i ili ` l' _ M `I N:i 1 7_- --- - �210 B —\ — ------?~\a I �I.7 I -- Ibl -,›\-,., • EL ).fil rq if 1 JO .I'VOIF C g 1.4 r 5" D :-.1L1 III •� •I._,, y • So Tu z >Z ... W T1mSk Wo i1 Pu (D Tu I H� I • .\' � i ' 25 J �-4 _: g0 168 1. Age\ilk : j\\ •z ' �' I Py Sk • e 451 f :IAgCn Wo -r • • 11. N' )!! (T. ! , if 4,_ ; __ i t_ •0:-] I \ M •4•AmB l� 1• •: --f • i L . a So 1 AgD •�• 7 fI ••�_ - --1): V I. ARllh• /,. ..iiV c-N Wo ' - M 194 1 = . • ' e° •. •1 • AmE3• • . . • ir Irli:11 7..... • I . • I , 1 /_. --.'• , 'I/ #..\ I r i • . . 6§11 1I\ NgB 1 • \ ,t Ago 32 I36._�- . _ --.•. \i •A C • ' • n i"IA • 1.• ABB ... ..o. d '94• . 1 •I -- \ �._ / •/'-',/i...1//i' tte m O �j=_ ' ` •.� Wa r it 44 •� :.. A. �� I 1 �.� Tank. 1ApC r ems• ( ` \ I:�_ If drained, this soil is used for row crops. It Ap2--3 to 8 inches, gray (SY 5/1) silty clay loam, is also used for pasture. Capability unit IIw-3; light brownish gray (2.5Y 6/2) dry; many, no woodland classification. fine, prominent, dark reddish-brown (SYR 3/3 and 3/4) mottles and common, fine, prominent mottles of strong brown (7.5YR 5/6) and red- Urban Land dish yellow (7.5YR 6/6) dry; moderate, fine and very fine, angular blocky structure; hard, Urban land (Ur) is soil that has been modified by friable, sticky, plastic; common fine roots; disturbance of the natural layers with additions of medium acid; abrupt, wavy boundary. 4 to 6 fill material several feet thick to accommodate large inches thick. industrial and housing installations. In the Green B21g--8 to 38 inches, gray (SY 5/1) silty clay loam, River Valley the fill ranges from about 3 to more gray (5Y 6/1) dry; common, fine, prominent, than 12 feet in thickness, and from gravelly sandy brown (7.SYR 4/4) mottles and medium, promi- nent to gravelly loam in texture. nent mottles of brownish yellow (10YR 6/6) dry; The erosion hazard is slight to moderate. No 25 percent of matrix is lenses of very dark capability or woodland classification. brown (10YR 2/2) and dark yellowish-brown (10YR 3/4) peaty muck, brown (7.SYR 4/2) dry; massive; hard, firm, sticky, plastic; few fine Woodinville Series roots; medium acid; clear, smooth boundary. 30 to 40 inches thick. The Woodinville series is made up of nearly level B22g--38 to 60 inches, greenish-gray (5BG 5/1) silt and gently undulating, poorly drained soils that loam, gray (5Y 6/1) dry; few, fine, prominent formed under grass and sedges, in alluvium, on stream mottles of brownish yellow (10YR 6/6) dry; bottoms. Slopes are 0 to 2 percent. The annual massive; hard, very friable, slightly sticky, precipitation ranges from 35 to 55 inches, and the slightly plastic; strongly acid. mean annual air temperature is about 50° F. The frost-free season is about 190 days. Elevation The A horizon ranges from dark grayish brown to ranges from about sea level to about 85 feet. gray and from silt loam to silty clay loam. The B In a representative profile, gray silt loam, horizon ranges from gray and grayish brown to olive silty clay loam, and layers of peaty muck extend to gray and greenish gray and from silty clay loam to a depth of about 38 inches. This is underlain by silt loam. In places there are thin lenses of very greenish-gray silt loam that extends to a depth of fine sandy loam and loamy fine sand. Peaty lenses 60 inches and more. are common in the B horizon. These lenses are thin, Woodinville soils are used for row crops, pasture, and their combined thickness, between depths of 10 and urban development. and 40 inches, does not exceed 10 inches. Soils included with this soil in mapping make up Woodinville silt loam (Wo) .--This soil is in elon- no more than 25 percent of the total acreage. Some gated and blocky shaped areas that range from 5 to areas are up to 15 percent Puget soils; some are up nearly 300 acres in size. It is nearly level and to 10 percent Snohomish soils; and some areas are up gently undulating. Slopes are less than 2 percent. to 10 percent Oridia, Briscot, Puyallup, Newberg, Representative profile of Woodinville silt loam, and Nooksack soils. in pasture, 1,700 feet south and 400 feet west of Permeability is moderately slow. There is a sea- the north quarter corner of sec. 6, T. 25 N., R. 7 sonal high water table at or near the surface. In E. : _ drained areas, the effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. In undrained areas, rooting depth Apl--0 to 3 inches, gray (SY 5/1) silt loam, grayish is restricted. The available water capacity is brown (10YR 5/2) dry; common, fine, prominent, high. Runoff is slow, and the hazard of erosion is dark reddish-brown (SYR 3/4) and reddish-brown slight. Stream overflow is a severe hazard unless (SYR 5/4) mottles; moderate, medium, crumb flood protection is provided (pl. III, top) . structure; hard, friable, sticky, plastic; This soil is used for row crops, pasture, and many fine roots; medium acid; clear, smooth urban development. Capability unit IIw-2; woodland boundary. 2 to 4 inches thick. group 3w2. 33 i ��^A CIVIL ENGINEERING,LAND PLANNING,SURVEYING,ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES '1 fr Val 9. e <r' ENG,"���� March 1, 1999 Mr. Peter Rosen, Senior Planner City of Renton Development Services Division-Development/Planning Renton City Hall, 6th Floor 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 RE: Application for Administrative Site Plan Approval Candlewood Suites Hotel 6661 T 0 OW W 900 Block of S.W. 16th Street Renton, Washington NO.N3a dO M Our Job No. 6882 ONINNKid 1N2,':; Dear Mr. Rosen: On behalf of the Candlewood Hotel Company, Inc., Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc., is pleased to submit the following application materials for Administrative Site Plan Approval for the above-referenced project: 1. Twelve completed Master Application forms (original plus eleven copies). 2. Twelve copies of the completed SEPA checklist. 3. Three copies of the title report with five copies of the exceptions. 4. Two sets of self-adhesive mailing labels for all property owners within 300 feet of the boundaries of the subject property. 5. Two copies of a signed and notarized City of Renton Development Services Division "List of Surrounding Property Owners" form listing all property owners, their mailing addresses, and King County Assessor's account numbers within 300 feet of the boundaries of the subject site. 6. One check for $1,500 for Administrative Site Plan Approval and Environmental Review. 7. Five copies of the January 14, 1999, pre-application meeting summary. 8. Twelve copies of the project narrative. 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT,WA 98032 (425)251-6222 (425)251-8782 FAX Mr. Peter Rosen, Senior Planner City of Renton Development Services Division Development/Planning -2- March 1, 1999 9. Five copies of the construction mitigation description. 10. Five copies of the neighborhood detail map. 11. Twelve copies of the project site plan. 12. Five copies of the parking, lot coverage, and landscape analysis. 13. Twelve copies of the architectural elevations. 14. Twelve copies of the grading elevations. 15. Five copies of the generalized utility plans. 16. Five copies of the drainage control plans. 17. Four copies of the drainage report. 18. Five copies of the geotechnical report by Earth Consultants Inc. 19. Twelve copies of the floodplain map. 20. Twelve copies of the wetlands report/delineation by B&A, Inc. 21. Five copies of the conceptual landscape plan. 22. Five copies of the floor plans. 23. Four copies of the tree cutting/land clearing plan. 24. Three copies of the traffic analysis by David I. Hamlin&Associates. 25. One 8-1/2-inch by 11-inch plan set reduction and one 4-inch by 6-inch reduction of the neighborhood detail map. 26. One set of colored display maps for the neighborhood detail map, site plan, landscape plan, and elevations. 27. Five sets of colored sign detail drawings. The Candlewood Hotel Company proposes to construct a 133-unit hotel on a vacant parcel located at S.W. 16th Street between the vacated streets of Pacific Avenue S.W. and Thomas Avenue S.W. The hotel will consist of a four-story structure with siding and composition shingles on a pitched-gable roof. The proposed building height is 49 feet 6 inches and the proposed lot coverage is 13.4 percent. One hundred forty-one(141) parking spaces are proposed with access to the site from S.W. 16th Street. The project proposes two stormwater drainage retention ponds and approximately 11,850 square feet of landscaping. Mr. Peter Rosen, Senior Planner City of Renton Development Services Division Development/Planning -3- March 1, 1999 There is an existing wetland of approximately 1,850 square feet in size located within the northwest corner of the property (refer to wetland study by B&A, Inc., dated August 1998). This wetland will be preserved in its current condition. As required by the City of Renton road standards, a 5-foot landscape strip and a 5-foot sidewalk are proposed at the front of the property. This sidewalk encroaches into the site approximately 1 foot; an easement will be granted to the City of Renton for this encroachment. Due to this configuration, the proposed landscape strip on site(behind the sidewalk)is a minimum of 9 feet in width. This on-site landscape strip varies in width from 9 feet to more than 30 feet, for an overall average of more than the 10-foot minimum required. Therefore, it is requested that this minimum 9-foot landscape planter width be allowed through the discretionary Site Plan Approval process. As shown on the site plan, a monument sign is located at the front of the property and a pole sign is located at the rear of the property. Understanding that only one freestanding sign is permitted on the property, either the project plans will be revised at building permit submittal to show only one freestanding sign, or the Candlewood Hotel Company will apply for a sign variance. The two signs shown on the site plan are for informational purposes only. Based on the City's Site Plan Approval checklist and submittal items identified during our pre-application conference, the above materials should constitute a complete Administrative Site Plan Approval application. If additional materials are required, please contact me at this office immediately. Thank you for your assistance with this project. Sincerely, Bruce K. Creager, Director of Planning ices CSF/es/sm 6882c.011 enc: As Noted cc: Mr. Chuck Zernickow, Candlewood Hotel Company, Inc. (w/enc) Mr. Jeff Melby, Weis Builders, Inc. (w/enc) Mr. Merl Potter, Weis Builders, Inc. (w/enc) Mr. Gregg Wilhite, Law-Kingdon, Inc. (w/enc) Mr. Daniel K. Balmelli, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. Mr. Brian D. Smith, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. Mr. Chris S. Ferko, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. MEMORANDUM • DATE: 1212.316g TO: Long Range Planning FROM: Jim Hanson, Development Services Division Director • SUBJECT: New Preliminary Application: 91,0 op sed LOCATION: lam' Oif` tanTi PZM i Please review the attached preliminary project plans for consistency with applicable Comprehensive Plan Policies. Please submit yo r written comments to ./ -f6r. no later than jyl,l/ . Thank you. We will not be able to include comments received after this date in the presentation/summary we prepare for the applicant. • /6-(/- 11 —17360RM/1g/44' A5 0"LO, S,i C t s r'3 c.nt,97-e-rp -urtue Nv U cy 155UL7 � 1 c2 Si.2/i tcZL �LperVffv, • Z._r r_,I CITY OF RL! MAR 01 ) 4 • Q-3 U) 11;\) • Please confirm that the proposed perimeter and interior planter areas can be counted to meet the code's parking lot landscape area requirements. • Please define any specifications for landscape design, such as requirements for layout.quantity, and/or plant species. • Please specify requirements for the screening of trash enclosures. E. Parking: The Renton Zoning Code requires one space per guestroom and two spaces per three employees. Up to 30 percent of the parking spaces may be compact. The proposed 133 units and the hotel will have a maximum of 6 employees on shift at one time. Required parking is 137 spaces. The proposed Candlewood Hotel provides 141 parking spaces, and 20 percent are compact. The hotel provides 5 handicapped parking spaces, consistent with ADA requirements. All parking stalls are dimensioned in compliance with City of Renton standards. F. Circulation: One boulevard-type driveway is proposed to S.W. 16th Street, with 20-foot entry and exit aisles on either side of a 5-foot by 30-foot landscaped median. All internal drive aisles are a minimum 24 feet in width. As discussed with Corey Thomas of the City of Renton Fire Department, all turning angles are consistent with Fire Department requirements for emergency vehicle access. A hammerhead turnaround for emergency vehicles is provided at the rear of the property. No loading bays are proposed. • Please confirm that the emergency vehicle access will be acceptable to the Fire Marshal's office. • Please confirm that the driveway design will be acceptable to the City of Renton Traffic Engineer. • Please confirm that a traffic study will not be required for this project. • Please confirm any traffic impact fees and impact fee formula G. Signage: Proposed signs include a monument (ground) sign on S.W. 16th Street, a freeway-oriented freestanding sign at the northeast corner of the property, and wall signs on the north, south, and west elevations of the building. • Please clarify if there is an aggregate limit to the amount of allowable sign area. c-�� C.i-Y-100 5 d /ter > lc; /,'w4 ;- F- fi t/I c a 7 /tom,?!1 20 • Please clarify any known requirements from the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT)for signage adjacentd to a state 1highway. C.`--' `� -7 • q 2 w &_ - 6c I-1 1� :r� :?-f <3C-{ti���T� �� vt� �i,t 'f r. • Please confirm if the property is located within the boundaries of the Renton Airport Approach Plan `- e and any associated height limitations and/or requirements for hazard marking and lighting. • Please confirm the following: a) Since the property is adjacent to 1-405 and S.W. 16th Street, the Candlewood Hotel is entitled to any two of the following sign types: freestanding, roof, ground, projecting, or combination. 6882.004 [BKC/jssl b) The proposed ground sign on S.W. 16th Street is consistent with code requirements for distance from intersections and driveways. ,20 eiavx c) Freestanding signs above 10 feet in height must meet building setback requirements. d) The height of a freestanding sign may not exceed 250 feet in a CO zone provided there are no • height limitations according to WSDOT or the Renton Airport Approach Plan. e) Wall signs are allowed on each side of the building provided the signs do not exceed 20 percent of the building facade. 6882.004 [BKC/jssj • (cY o CITY OF RENTON FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU 11.0 MEMORANDUM �N.rO DATE: December 30, 1998 TO: Peter Rosen, Senior Planner FROM: Corey Thomas, Plans Review Inspector SUBJECT: Preliminary Comments for Candlewood II Hotel 1. The preliminary fire flow cannot be determined without further information like total floor area and type of construction. 2. The fire mitigation fees are applicable at the rate of $0.52 per square foot of building. This fee is payable at the time of building permit issuance. 3. An approved fire sprinkler system is required to be installed throughout the structure. 4. An approved fire alarm is required to be installed throughout the structure. 5. An approved dry standpipe is required to be installed in all interior stairwells. 6. Fire apparatus access appears adequate, however all interior curbing and landscape islands need to be shaved in order to meet 25-feet interior turning radius. CT:ct Candle2 CANDLEWOOD II HOTEL 900 BLK. OF SW 16TH Street Pre-Application January 14, 1999 WATER: 1. A 12-inch water main is available in SW 16th St. 2. There will be a System Development Connection charge for water is $0.113 per gross square foot of site area,but not less than$850. 3. One fire hydrant is required for each 1000 gpm of required fire flow. Each fire hydrant delivers 1000 gpm of fire flow 4. The primary hydrant is to be within 150-feet of the structures,but not closer than 50-feet. The secondary hydrants must be within 300-feet of the structures. 5. Drawings to adhere to City of Renton drafting standards available at the 6th floor counter. 6. A vertical profile will be required showing the water system. 7. If required fire flow is over 2500 gpm a water loop system is required. A loop system is required to be located in a 15-ft. Utility Easement. The required fire flow will be determine by the Fire Prevention Department. 8. The project is located on the NE 24-23-4 quarter section map. • C:99cm001 W 99CM00 I W.DOC\ CANDLEWOOD II HOTEL 900 BLK. OF SW 16TH Street Pre-Application January 14, 1999 SEWER(Waste Water): 1. The Sewer System Development Connection charge is$0.078 per gross square feet, but not less than$850. 2. If the project produce fats, oils, or grease, then an appropriate removal system will be required per plumbing code . 3. Side sewer line to have a 2%slope to property line. 4. Side sewer to have a cleanout every 100-feet. 5. A sewer backflow prevention device is required for the sewer line when the floor elevation is below 25-ft. 6. Vertical profile to be shown on construction plans. 7. Civil Construction drawings to adhere to City of Renton drafting standards. Drawing size is 22 x 34. 8. Show floor elevation on plans.. 9. A 24-inch sewer main is available in SW 16th St. 10. The site is located in the Black River Basin. 11. A conceptual plan for utilities will be required for SEPA Review. 12. Maintain a 10-ft separation from other utilities. 98cm001 S 99CMOOIS DOC\ CANDLEWOOD II HOTEL 900 BLK. OF SW 16TH Street Pre-Application January 14, 1999 STORM DRAINAGE: 1. The Storm System Development Connection charge is $0.129 per square foot of new impervious surface area, but not less than$385. 2. Show topography of entire site and minimum of 30-feet outside the property. 3. Show all CB/MH,storm pipe,detention/retention system, swales and wetlands,ect. 4. Use NAVD 1988 datum for elevations. 5: The proposed project must demonstrate adequacy of proposed City code requirements for detention,water quality and conveyance capacity. 6. Drawing scale is 1"=20'.. 7. Provide legend, vicinity map and legal description on the title sheet. 8. A level one Drainage Report will be required and level 2 and/or level 3 may be required should conditions warrant. The level one report is to address Core requirements and Special requirements as listed in the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual. 9. Runoff collected from pavement and gravel surface with vehicle access/parking must flow through oil/water separator CB or adequate biofiltration system. 10. The FEMA map shows a portion of the site is in a flood area. The flood area to be shown on your Plans. 99cm001 D 99Ch1001 D.DOC\ CANDLEWOOD II HOTEL 900 BLK. OF SW 16TH Street Pre-Application January 14, 1999 TRANSPORTATION: 1. The traffic mitigation fee is $75 per new trip generated. The trip rate is 8.70 per unit in the ITE Trip Generation Manual. The estimated cost at 80% occupancy is $69,426. Easimated trips are 926. _ 2. New sidewalks, required on SW 16th St. 3. A minimum of a 5-foot planter strip is required between the curb and sidewalk. 4. Back edge of of the sidewalk would need to be in a side walk easement. 5. Provide a brief traffic report showing the trip distribution from the site. 99cm001T 99Cb100IT.DOC\ ' 4 CITY OF RENTON Planning /Building / Public Works MEMORANDUM DATE: January 14, 1999 TO: Pre-Application File FROM: Peter Rosen, Senior Planner • SUBJECT: Candlewood II- Pre-App File No. 98-105 We have completed a preliminary review of the pre-application for the proposed Candlewood II Hotel. Listed below and attached on several sheets are our preliminary findings. Although every attempt is made to ensure that these comments are complete, a more thorough examination of the project at the time of application submittal may reveal additional issues that may alter these comments or require additional comments. Zoning. The project site was rezoned from Medium Industrial (IM) to Commercial Office (CO) in November 1998. Hotels are permitted in the CO zone as a secondary use provided that the location is within the Employment Area-Valley (EAV) Comprehensive Plan designation, which is the case for the subject site. Development Standards Setbacks: The minimum front street setback required in the CO zone depends on building height. The proposed 4 story hotel would require a minimum front setback of 20 feet which applies to building heights between 25 and 80 feet. There are no rear or side yard setbacks required in the CO zone, except where a CO lot is adjacent to residential zone, and this does not apply to the subject site. Building Height: The maximum building height in the CO zone is 250 feet. Lot Coverage: The maximum lot coverage for buildings is 65% of the total site area. There is no standard for a maximum of impervious surfacing on a site. The proposed building covers approximately 14% of the total lot area. Landscaping: The CO zone requires a minimum 10 foot wide landscape strip abutting public streets, SW 16th Street in this case. There is also a code requirement for a pedestrian connection between the public entrance of the building and the street. Comprehensive Plan policies encourage landscaping and berming to screen parking areas from the street. It appears that this could be accomplished within the landscape strip frontages as shown on the proposed site plan. - For development in the Green River Valley, 2% of a total site area must be landscaped as natural, wildlife area. The Code specifies that these landscaped areas should be aggregated on a site, and where possible should be located contiguous to wildlife habitat landscaping on adjacent properties. Native plant landscaping around stormwater facilities is a good alternative for meeting this requirement. The parking ordinance requires landscaping equal to 5% of the area of a parking lot over 10,000 square feet in size. This landscaping should be interior to the parking lot. The calculation of this required landscaping should be provided by the applicant with submittal of the application. Parking: The Parking and Loading Ordinance requires 1 parking space for each guest room plus 2 parking spaces for each 3 employees. The pre-application site plan includes sufficient parking to meet the code standard. Environmentally Sensitive Areas: The site plan indicates a wetland area in the northwest corner of the site. A wetland study should accompany the application materials. The wetland edges should be Candlewood II Hotel.DOC • delineated and the wetland sttoula oe classified according to the Wetland l..-...agement Ordinance. Required wetland buffer widths depend upon the classification of the wetland. The wetland report should evaluate potential impacts to the wetland and wetland buffer. Sianage: The sign code allows one freestanding sign (includes monument, pole, roof, projecting, etc.) per street frontage. The maximum sign area is 1 1/2 square feet per each linear foot of street frontage, up to a maximum of 300 square feet, which includes all sign faces. In addition, the code allows wall signs with a I;opy area not to exceed 20% of the building facade. The code defines street frontage as "a public right-of-way affording direct access." Therefore,the subject site has one street frontage along SW 16th Street and is entitled to only one freestanding sign. Permit Requirements. The propose I would require SEPA environmental review and Site Plan Review. These reviews are conducted concurrently and take approximately 8 to 10 weeks,which includes the appeal periods. Site Plan Review: Site Plan Review is required for all development proposals (which meet SEPA thresholds) i i the Commercial Office (CO) zone designation. The proposal would require Administrative Site Plan Re view as it does not appear to meet any of the thresholds (i.e. site over 10 acres, adjacent to residential zDne, 100,000 square feet in floor area, 300 parking stalls, building height over 4 stories) requiring a public hearing before the Hearing Examiner. Site Plan Review evaluates site layout, building orientation, pedestrian and vehicular circulation, parking, screening/buffering, and code/policy compliance, according to specific criteria outlined in the Site Plan Review Ordinance (Section 4-31-33). SEPA Environmental Review - A SEPA environmental checklist must be submitted with the application materials. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) will review the proposal and issue a threshold determinatic n. The most common SEPA mitigation measures include a traffic mitigation fee of $75 per new average daily trip and a Fire mitigation fee equal to $0.52 per square foot of new construction. CC: Jana I-uerter Candlewood II Hotel.DOC • D) w LfLEJU -rm ° (_ram,00 WE8 2, traffic design transportation planning 1319 Dexter Avenu North Seattle,Washington 98109 (206)285-9035 Suite 270 FAX 285-6345 February 25, 1999 City csf Renton 1055 f.. Grady Way Renton, Washington 98055 ATTN: Clint Morgan Planning/Building/Public Works Department Subjei:t: Trip Impacts Associated with the Proposed Candlewood Suites Hotel; Renton, WA. Dear Mr. Morgan: The pirpose of this letter is to summarize the traffic- relat3d impacts associated with the development of the Candlewood Suites Hotel in the City of Renton, and provide a review of trip generation data specifically conducted for this Motel chain. The following summarizes our findings. Background The Candlewood Suites Hotel is a proposed business lodging facility located on the north side of SW 16th Street, west of Lind Avenue SW and Raymond Avenue SW, between the vacated streets of Thomas Avenue SW and Pacific Avenue SW. (See Figure 1. ) I-405 borders the north side of the prcperty. The hotel will include 133 rooms which will be designed for the business traveler and consist of both suites and studio apartments. The project manager, U Bazghausen Consulting Engineers, has indicated that no restaurant or conference facilities will be provided at the zZ cm 0 site. W D.W > The hotel site is approximately a 2 . 9 acre parcel currently zre ' • , , undeveloped and vegetated with deciduous trees. The site vju' c ., . is zoned "CO" , commercial office district, which would c- � Q , al:.ow the proposed development. Access to the site will be i U provided from a single access off of SW 16th Street near t' the east property line. Parking for employees and patrons will be provided on-site. SW 16th Street is an east-west three-lane street with curb, gutter, and street lights, with sidewalks provided on the 1 south side of the street. SW 16th Street is fronted by offices and warehouse/light industrial buildings and has a posted speed of 35 mph. Several large Boeing office buildings are located along SW 16th Street to the west of the proposed site. Metro route 153 serves this street. ,Other arterials in the vicinity include Oakesdale Avenue to the west and Lind Avenue to the east. Both of these streets are multi-lane facilities and provide grade- separated crossings of I-405. The intersections of SW 16th Street with Lind Avenue and Oakesdale Avenue are controlled by traffic signals. Trip Generation The ITE Trip Generation Manual (published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers, 6th Edition, 1997) is typically used to estimate the number of trips which can theoretically be expected to be generated by a development of this type. Land Use Code 312, Business Hotel, from the Trip Generation Manual most closely describes the proposed use and is defined as follows: "Business hotels are places of lodging aimed toward the business traveler. They provide sleeping accommodations and other limited facilities, such as a breakfast bar and an afternoon beverage bar (no lunch or dinner is served, and no meeting facilities are provided) . Each unit is a large single room. All locations nationwide are in suburban areas. " The trip generation data provided by ITE for business hotels is quite limited, i.e. , only one study was conducted for the weekday trip generation and three studies for -the peak hour data. The user is cautioned to use the data with care due to the small sample size. Barghausen Consulting Engineers has routed a copy of a trip generation study prepared by Johnson & Associates (located in Oklahoma City) which was conducted specifically for the Candlewood Hotels. This report summarized trip generation data for Candlewood Hotels in three different cities during 7-day periods in October of 1996 and June of 1997 . The sites were in full operation and no holidays occurred during the count periods. This data collection is much more extensive than the information provided by ITE for this land use type. The results of the Johnson & Associates study (a copy of which has been attached) showed daily and peak hour trip rates from the Candlewood sites to be lower than the daily and peak hour trip rates for Land Use Code 312 . These 2 lover rates are based on the weekday data only, which was typically higher than the weekend data. Based on my review of the Johnson & Associates report, I feel that the study was conducted in an accurate and professional manner, and thEt the results should be considered acceptable to use for thE proposed Renton site. Based on the Candlewood study results, we have summarized thE estimated trip generation for the subject site showing both the ITE values and the Candlewood specific values (for 10( % occupancy) . We have also included the trip generation va] ues for an 80% occupancy which we understand the City typically uses in assessing lodging facilities. The following table summarizes the trip generation for the proposed 133 room hotel using the average trip rates as noted. TABLE 1 TRIP GENERATION CANDLEWOOD SUITES HOTEL • (133 ROOMS) ITE VALUES CANDLEWOOD VALUES TRIP # OF TRIPS TRIP # OF TRIPS TIME PERIOD RATE 100% OCC. 80% OCC. RATE 100% OCC. 80% OCC. Daily 7 . 27 967 774 4 . 28 569 455 AM Peak Enter 45 36 35 28 E:cit 32 26 25 20 Total 0. 58 77 62 0 . 45 60 48 PM Peak Enter 49 39 38 30 E:{it 33 27 26 21 Total 0. 62 82 66 0.48 64 51 The above table shows that the proposed hotel would generate considerably fewer daily trips when using the specific data for the Candlewood Hotels, as compared to the ge~ieric data presented in the Trip Generation Manual . The reisons for the lower trip rates are not identified, but it ma/ simply be that the type of clientele using the Candlewood facilities tends to be business people traveling together and using a single vehicle, or that the small sample size used for the ITE values was simply not representative of this type of land use. Trip Distribution The proposed hotel is conveniently located near both I-405 3 and SR-167 , close to Boeing facilities, the airport, and Southcenter. Patrons of the hotel will most likely be those conducting business in the surrounding area. Figure 2 shows the estimated trip distribution for the project by percent and daily volume. Figures 3 and 4 show the AM and PM peak hour trip assignments. It is expected that the site traffic will be distributed in all directions via Lind Avenue and Oakesdale Avenue, with access to I-405 or SR-167 available via Grady Way. Cor.clusions ThE proposed Candlewood Suites Hotel will generate adcitional traffic onto the adjacent street system. However, based on studies conducted for the hotel chain, the number of trips generated by the site will be lower then ITE Trip Generation Manual estimates, which are based on a very small sample size. Since the trip generation sttdy prepared for the Candlewood Hotel provides extensive data that appears to be reasonable, the City of Renton should consider this data as appropriate for determining the mitigation fee for the project. Pursuant to Renton City Council Resolution No. 3100, the City of Renton imposes a traffic mitigation fee of $75 per da:.ly trip for new development that is subject to SEPA review. Using the Candlewood trip generation values, the mitigation fee for 100% occupancy of the rooms would be $4: , 675. 00, and for 80% occupancy, the fee would be $3' , 125 . 00. We trust that the above information is useful to you in the processing of this application. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact our office. Sincerely, Geri Reinart, P. E. Davit I . Hamlin and Associates Atta,tments 4 ___________ ___. , __ .________________ A NORTH F. 1 E FF.a $ S 132/0 = ST }I 2NI�D < '� cm • t in• • [ l f�i•^f�38ti7 fi. 44,�``� • ;1' ; 7�--1 �� Pry^•Ci,,;.: L ='+"\, C -7-47 • _ `�i, I s ®.sig a- TceiN. ''7 ira t� __— , t `Pb• ,,• f' L i< T � � . /Ey f /_; �� / : �/�.� .far" A 'Try' 1 �' 7(�j 's'°_I s'T1l • 7� a � '1r 4.' I/��+y !f 1 •a; ‘4,„°...., :... ._ 31.4tIvuotclot �I,pc ors I� 3' ]''''2N 7 •1' /. 'I Y'' s.� �-4'. V3 Irn i,�i ,..„:.,11r7:,...• 7•. J ,j pit. 4 I .,.. .,:at)ti: •...A,,,,,.s.,_,,, ,4,6143-kfr 411=01 -r,r •• „id- / ,,...:.;..4••:.....m..,,„169 ',.;;IF..?,;.5.- D 2 h, j a, , .N, -i•- i&b,.. - '-; • lPag 1. ': 90u j -su,, ifs., ti t,11. . t 1.* ,, I C !•I. �SU a;;1 �+ d 1 , a q ;, ;1 ...1, Mgr, .� � 41r►r///L' j ,.,: (lr4173I / , t� !' ••1 r s {, - � r;,T1 1'CT• �i T!T'ERI Sir CLiJ l24lyi ''� • s Fs #�S fe�, ase813 g .6A• T5 9q°iiAVXruariYgi WV�rW. • ` ® .ems r' tB 4i ;:S.":,:'c 1!T�s,. 44 3`-1..'8 I ".C'r.Air D,.'EV.3�i1'.4. J�..s 515 - 1 i , ',•"• m 1 1 c _ I j 1 4g�otal. IP .< 3tx ` d�. '4tl� ' a ;nl ,1 _t' W t�S r, 5 r PTuxt i a •111i:•Pa"i r. t, 1T% C .�R. ' ,•Iyf ,k sT� S v6 1+ I DAV '' " 3 > e2 ° • °4R'r<R 1 I�C�.r � 1,.i.c a-1, ON V1L P .// s' .7 RI x s .. 1* .r• r.f.. (,:tif. 1'ETN t./I. ,Rx w j� � � Ri.cc,,,,u.4•-ttr^ �Iv. ��?�' ,'g�.��.�°�� -� s>t.1-•-- 2 t.. jai / s'"� .,Iliz lOala g gig 5 � / t405 I� *,r, $ ,-..q.'a_ x a • a,.4 ..,�F,S',,�. .✓, 6 .M3 jti4 p�`.l SN ,"�:i:..�4- ua ..��. �li a^li I } c< ►t,'fsr-'i i��i`.T ` �i dt G RSE �4 s t 1 �" t Tl ST W t`54 4 3. p ti - �������. _�1Eti�� '.S I t r T + .v' s � ,637'Eh.Yp �I a��• 1 ��/in i , ,L a, ® 1% `.'s�ik t'1�Z*t•Rj � ,••• £V sw,i'9 scii xA4I- ''EV:e i I ; a' g 'Att` 1 c• _ Yr.G �1 r j TT W, Tf'F�1 • c Ff'. 4�: f t.. � rSO IL' I"r %e ;M'i`,J�� L `r ro , , �. .•3„ �'. x / T • Z c:,(..,...... , te 4f9y / ? Y ``� -t i r ,ZRt t4 ,=f '6.342.S I 4 i• '6�5 F� It .a= A i,•S6�II`., fi7' d 1 \r - •r I 6 1,1 5 cS I,.ya R r T I SM-2JRO STs 1`�a i2 �p t: s I +i� n Tr M � `V � 'W^ �� ^L� : 'ZI i?, 14r T•,e, ,x 1 .,�. r i...5 . _ ` . �[ 162ND'< ST — y 6M4 e hn._Lc. J 1 f n— —S �' M }I y w r 1LSODW SC IWrD STP F 't k �� k ` �� ' r� ` sl' 'tl''> a •X SE 1wM ^ ST $E 1647,1 Su '1 2777{ K 3 T2r„ 10. _,�L• - \ i',. I �.�©w�tog, N HIM •t., 117aoS ,1�}T:44' Y I f,'. ti.. `` rrtµ^ti a `LIs S, SC 16S7N ' ,-r( ttiii;::: _ •.1?!'3'_ ILA,, , 0.7 4,n<Y� ,i t.. E 166TN :,. , sT T '^ sr 6 :1 2 � '29 STD F� `4 (jC ••• W ST pppSF I6)M ST zsc_,ws� j4 m ...`. c6 'sw'4`,�,,,,,{{�� =SSE d av 7 li ,.i j V"I•E: 1 �IT_ i. •- 'i•iC • - '31ST ST , et < . 29 W ,, ,�^ y',�\ ,,Arlt ,,.r' I ' Tr O i fL—.. ? a d^g = ,nESE16fTN/L ts ySCinn, /i "5_ . 4Ps y.Pt I ♦ r 54,\ r SE- N ST •„ St .r4. '1 1 h ..T1 " 167� s ' ''::i - rs aL__u-ST ,:yy f�, r ,fr+SY e.1 T. 147'�s''f STF 4s3 14 rt.S7Y SE I lID ST a •-r•r• SE _ - 34 ST•5 d"� SE Tao ST.-. 41 4_,, : ;-,rsTl 7 , i,, r�, i >< tri,a - -wa, tt nt,lo+uy 1 Ya�„^`• N1`'i c K�•T o I •typo t.`l-- 51� fr'�` •�4. St 1447s •. , �F Z RR.. W I Y t sI]= STS'Al •. `„1 N. St 1/3,U st_ ~ r,144 Y.( .��� 41 sr h-7 �� y�'�Ei' ._.a+3q •\ 44 Yiw{ Ix'• `S 3' SC IISTN FF 1T/M 39 .ST ,F I 1 f,. : E•. SE 176TH - 4A� ~ - ,•':,1 ii• -z..,i q,,t..,:•f,...... iiii.....,41 . 't z fQ"� st.=�L "";'M ,,I I e�r�'' _ a'<' S� .x:S 5 ,n: ®I y 8, '' r�k G bI _ a =1 1 =! 1 1nD n PROJECT V ICI\ITY N/(AP -F T O U R£ I GANDLEY OOD HOTEL FA&E DAVIL I. HAMLIN i ASSOCIATES SEATTLE,WA. F-I NORTH 15% 25% t6S85 �( 14) ui ui Q Q Q z 1-405 N uJ (151) 6Rg7Y WAY I 50% rJ N SW T. 1596 55 65, 1 SR—I61 a'S A PROJECT SITE— XX — DAILY TRIPS AT 100% OCCUPANCY vt 85 (XX) - DAILY TRIPS AT (65) 50% OCCUPANCY ESTIMATED TRIP DISTRIBUTION (BY PERCENT DAILY VOLUME) DAVID I.HAMLIN 4 ASSOCIATES FI U GANDLEWOOD HOTEL PA6E SEATTLE,WA. F-2 v NORTH • 111 LL1 Q Q � Q 1-405 N eRArfi WAY 9) • 13) ra b) SW 16TH ST. I� N IT 10 14 21-(15 4�3 `I (I) (I) r2)I (.5) (II) (Iv 2 (5) (2) 2 (l) SR-I6 1 • (I) I (I) It PROJECT SITE- XX -PEAK HOUR TRIPS AT 100%OCCUPANCY (XX) -PEAK HOUR TRIPS AT 60%OCCUPANCY ESTIMATED AM PEAK HOUR TRIP ASSIGNMENT DAVID I.HAMLIN 4 ASSOCIATE-5 FIGURE S CANDLEWOOD HOTEL PA&E SEATTLE,WA. F-3 NORTH w !u Q Q Q Z 1-405 N W O oRp,DY WAY II AD 1-1 b) 8 110) 14) rd SW IETH T. II 111 I 2 2 10 15 25 (is; (3r(2) (I) (1) (2)1 2 • (I)(I) 215R-I67 (I) PROJECT SITE- XX -PEAK HOUR TRIPS AT 100%OCCUPANCY (xx) -PEAK HOUR TRIPS AT SO%OCCUPANCY ESTIMATED PM PEAK HOUR TRIP ASSIGNMENT DAVID I.HAMLIN 4 ASSOCIATES FI U CANDLEYVOOD HOTEL PAGE SEATTLE,WA. F-4 T T L . t { f Report on Trip Generation ,..: , • [..::':.. .. • "7 ••:•..•..' ;•'; -. : ' • . : . • • iaj •. Candlewood Hotels • •4,:.4.... *. ...•'••. ,••,• .•.,.•-.•."...•...,•••. .- Wichita; Omaha and Denver .• •'•i,i,,.....i .. •'..:54:.':.,,.t<:..'..i. ,„, : „... .; • August 1997 . 1. . V • • : .. • !� 1• • u .. • , : TRAFFIC D .. , , T R... .,. . •. .. .• ••• • • . .. • . .. , ,.„ •• • ,„ .., .... . . . .. . . . . . 51 • .....• .. ., • .. .. „. .. , . : . .„ ,..,. ,, „ ,_..: • 'Produced by: • 4 JOHNSON"&ASSOCIATES,INC. a 5520 NORTH•FRANCIS AVENUE OKLAHOMA CITY;OKIAHOMA 73113 ..:< VOICE. (405)343-307. . FAX (405) 343-3073 4. +: www.okcoline.com!jo!Irscn W:L:!•:Li:.v.:xx.::.:,H.vy.••.v:-.:NN•s:J.aNWI.:xa;.>:ay:w:?l:::a£w�ti:N::cwW:n:aie{aY.:wi .. •MMc«Jlxa»stf+t+.wa:ti.eN�x[:KK:i::�'.eei":. 6a: A , i. I .... <MNwx ..�......v.. yZ f ,..:..., ;:�:cn::.•..:'::......�.+:_`;•:::f:i�;�j.v�a�u�'>'�:::s:.'.:5%<.,.: �i:I�,c'+��iil;3ii.�:�wY:iitbieiiw:.r. TABLE', OF CONTENTS Report on Trip Generation for Candlewood Hotels at Wichita, Omaha and Denver I. Introduction 1 II. Executive Summary 2 III. Wichita Site Summary 6 IV. Omaha Site Summary 9 V. Denver Site Summary 12 I I I I Report on Trip Generation • for Candlewood Hotels at Wichita, Omaha and Denver I. Introduction This report contains summaries of trip generation data recorded for Candlewood Hotels at locations in three metropolitan areas during 10-day periods of October 1996 and June 1997. All data were collected using International Traffic Corporation recording devices with counter tubes placed across entry drives at the three sites. Hotels at each site were in full operation during the monitoring period. Tabulated•data presented here indicate that trip generation rates at each site were lower than that compiled in Trip Generation (Fifth Edition) published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. Trip-end data compiled by Johnson & Associates staff during extended monitoring periods at operating Candlewood Hotels at Wichita, Kansas; Omaha, Nebraska; and Denver, Colorado; appear throughout this report. Compiled data cover at least one weekend and all five weekdays for each site. All measurments were taken during non- holiday periods. ITE trip generation rates for business hotels, rth heading 312, estimated daily rates of 7.27 trips per occupied hotel unit per day. ITE data estimated peak hour trip generation rates at 0.56 (AM) and 0.57 (PM), trips per occupied hotel unit per hour. ITE weekday peak hours were reported between 7:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m. Trip end data recorded at the three sites were verified and adjusted based on real-time field counts taken at each site during the monitoring periods. Raw data were assembled for this report using TASLITE traffic management software. Standard deviations for collected Candlewood data upon which this report is based ranged from 0.12 to 0.75. Standard deviations for ITE data (3 locations) were reported at 0.76. Total trip ends as tabulated in this report were continuously measured and recorded by electronic counters placed each location over periods of at least 10 days. The collected trip end L data were correlated with the number of occupied rooms for each day the trip counters were in place, as reported by Candlewood management. Measured Candlewood trip end data were compiled in such a way as to match ITE compilations as closely as possible. 1 II. Executive Summary • The collected Candlewood data presented in this report indicate trip generation rates generation rates significantly lower than that predicted by appying ITE rates. TABLE la: Candlewood Trip Generation Per Occupied Room (Combined - Daily), on the following page, shows the combined result of trip data collected at Candlewood Hotels located in Wichita, Omaha and Denver. Data for individual sites has been included in additional tabulated forms in this report. Weekday trip generation rates measured at the three Candlewood sites came to a daily average of 4.28 trips per occupied room, 41 percent less than the 7.27 trips per occupied room reported in the ITE Trip Generation book. The maximum weekday trip generation rate showin in TABLE la of the Candlewood data was 4.78 trips per occupied room, 34 percent less than the ITE daily rate. In TABLE 3a: Trip Generation Compared, generation rates developed from the Candlewood data are applied to hotels of six sizes, ranging from 80 units to 150 units. The tabulation assumes that all units will be occupied and that trip generation rates will remain constant for the estimating period (one day). Based on the assembled trip generation data, a 122-unit Candlewood Hotel(the most typical size under development) may be expected to result in a total of 522 trip ends per day. Applying ITE generation rates for a business hotel of 122 units results in an estimate of 887 trips ends per day, 365 trip ends more than substantiated by the Candlewood rate of 4.28 trips per occupied room per day. Candlewood data for peak hour trip generation rates appear in TABLE lb: Candlewood Trip Generation Per Occupied Room (Combined - Peak). Peak hour trip generation data collected at each of the Candlewood site are consistent wiith daily rates, indicating significantly less trip generation than developed with ITE data. TABLE lb appears on the second following page. Weekday morning peak hours for the Candlewood data and the ITE data were between 7:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m. Afternoon peak data for weekdays were recorded between 4:00 p.m. and 6:00 p.m. for both Candlewood and ITE data. Peak hour rates as measured at the three Candlewood Hotel sites came to an AM average of 0.45 trips per occupied room, compared to 0.56 per occupied room for the ITE AM peak hour data. The Candlewood peak hour trip generation rate is a reduction of approximately 19.8 percent from the ITE AM peak. Afternoon data for Candlewood sites came to 0.48 trips per occupied room, compared to 0.57 trips per occupied room for the ITE PM data. The Candlewood trip generation rate is approximately 16.6 percent lower than the PM ITE rate. 2 ® MEE bliini MN mom =sum .m. TABLE 1 a: Candlewood Trip Generation Per Occupied Room (Combined - Daily) AM PM Daily Day of Trip Trip Trip Occupied AM Avg PM Avg Daily Avg Dates Week Ends Ends Ends Rooms Rate Rate Rate Oct. 11, June 13, June 20 Friday 409 676 _ 1085 , 236. 1.73 2.86 4.60 Oct. 12, June 14, June 21 Saturday _ 205 579 784 213 0.96 2.72 3.68 Oct. 13, June 15, June 22 Sunday 202 _ 565 767 263 0.77 2.15 2.92 Oct. 14, June 16, June 23 Monday 286 940 1226 316 0.91 2.97 3.88 Oct. 15, June 17, June 24 Tuesday 408 1015 1423 343 1.19 2.96 4.15 Oct. 16, June 18, June 25 Wednesday 391 1006 1397 349 1.12 2.88 4.00 Oct. 17, June 12, June 19 Thursday 428 926 1354 283 1.51 3.27 4.78 . TABLE 2a: Percent Difference of Daily Rates ITE Daily Candlewood Daily Percent Difference r7.27 4.28 -41.09% TABLE 3a: Trip Generation Compared , Numerical Differences Assuming All Units Occupied No. Hotel Candlewood ITE Numerical Units Daily Daily Difference 80 343.00 582.00 239.00 98 420.00 712.00 292.00 110 471.00 800.00 329.00 122 522.00 887.00 365.00 134 574.00 974.00 400.00 150 642.00 1091.00 449.00 ® TV= IN= XS= :® :ice :,... - - TABLE 1 b: Candlewood Trip Generation Per Occupied Room (Combined -Peak) AM PM Number Day of Trip Trip Occupied AM Peak PM Peak Dates Week Ends Ends Rooms Rate Rate Oct. 11, June 13, June 20 Friday 116 101 236 . 0.49 0.43 Oct. 12, June 14, June 21 Saturday 58 91 213 0.27 0.43 Oct. 13, June 15, June 22 Sunday 68 67 263 0.26 0.25 Oct. 14, June 16, June 23 Monday 117 160 316 0.37 0.51 Oct. 15, June 17, June 24 Tuesday 145 167 343 0.42 0.49 Oct. 16, June 18, June 25 Wednesday 168 158 349 0.48 0.45 . Oct. 17, June 12, June 19 Thursday 136 142 283 0.48 0.50 - TABLE 2b: Percent Difference of Peak Rates ITE AM Peak Can lewood A Peak Percent Difference 0.56 0.45 -19.77% ITE PM Peak Candlewood PM Peak Percent Difference 0.57 0.48 -16.64% TABLE 3b: Trip Generation Compared -Numerical Differences Assuming All Units Occupied No. Hotel Candlewood Trip Data ITE Trip Data Numerical Differences Units AM Peak PM Peak AM Peak PM Peak AM Peak PM Peak 80 36.00 38.00 45.00 46.00 9.00 10.00 . 98 44.00 47.00 55.00 56.00 11.00 12.00 110 49.00 52.00 62.00 63.00 13.00 14.00 122 55.00 58.00 68.00 70.00 13.00 15.00 134 60.00 64.00 75.00 76.00 15.00 16.00 150 67.00 71.00 84.00 86.00 ' 17.00 19.00 • �•�;lli te��...., e ...n•po7•t••-.'tll`;N.rv4:• •i' • . . . ..xe..•.R . Composite : AV Wee '<cay weak Hour • Trip Generation .Per Occupied Room 60 - r _ • r . C • W - . Q �= 50 . a) _ x U 45 - x a) > _ a) Q /� O J L L 1 1 �T i i L— x x 1 t II 35 J J L 1 1 I••-- I 1 `S 0 - J L J 1 L J 0 . I 1 1 . 1 1 1 i I . 1 _. I 1 1 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 X = Number of Occupied Rooms Fitted Power Curve T=a*xAb _i i MOM ein= am= �mm Composite : Pv Weekday Peak Hour Trip Generation Per Occupied Room 70 - • c 60 w - Q x x a) 50 Q) 40 0 L i > x II 30 _ J L J L 1 1 H 20 50 60 70 80 90 100 .110 120 130 140 X = Number of Occupied Rooms Fitted Power Curve T=a*x^b Tabulated daily trip generation data for each of the three Candlewood sites are included in Tables Ic, Id and le. In each case, measured Candlewood trip generation rates per occupied room are lower than published ITE rates, as shown in the following compilation: Location Candlewood ITE Diff. (pct) Wichita 5.39 7.27 25.8% Omaha 3.90 7.27 4G.4% IDenver 3.93 7.27 45.9% Combined 4.28 7.27 41.1% ri ail Peak hour trip,generation data for the individual Candlewood site are compiled in Tables If, lg and Ih. The tabulated peak morning hour data indicate that trip generation rates at Candlewood sites ranged from 7.7 percent lower than the ITE rate(0.56 trips per occupied room) at Denver to 31.8 percent lower at Wichita. Afternoon peak hour rates for the Candlewood sites ranged from 5.2 percent lower than the ITE value(0.57 trips per occupied room) at the Wichita site to 25 percent lower at the Denver site. Individual site peak hour rates are shown in the following compilation: Candlcwood ITE Difference (pct) Location AM/PM AM/PM AM/PM II Wichita 0.38/0.54 0.56/0.57 31.8%/ 5.2% Omaha 0.42/0.48 0.56/0.57 25.0%/16.6% Denver 0.52/0.43 0.56/0.57 7.7%/25.0% I Combined 0.45/0.48 0.56/0.57 19.8%/16.6% Based on the data presented in this report, trip generation rates for Candlewood Hotels 1 may reliably be anticipated at lesser rates than those produced by applying ITE trip generation rates. The range of reduced trip generation found in counts at each site varied from 7.7 percent I to 31.8 percent for AM peak hours and from 5.2 percent to 25 percent for PM peak hours. Combined rate reductions ranged from 16.6 percent to 19.8 percent. Overall, traffic loads generated by the Candlewood sites was less than predicted by ITE data. This was true for peak hour rates and for daily generation rates. In planning and implementing traffic management strategies for Candlewood sites, this data may be of value in ascertaining the need for warrant studies and the likely level of traffic impact a municipality may anticipate as a result of construction of a facility of this nature. 1 I ifill III. Wichita Site Summary Candlewood data collected for the Wichita, Kansas, site showed a daily weekday average trip-end rate of 5.39 trips per occupied room, 25.8 percent less than the 7.27 trips per occupied room from the ITE data. The tabulated Wichita daily (weekday and weekend) totals appear in TABLE lc: Candlewood Trip Generation Per Occupied Room (Wichita - 1 Daily), on the following page. Applying the measured weekday rate to a standard 122-unit Candlewood Hotel, the total number of trip-ends estimated at complete occupancy is 658 trips per day, as shown in TABLE 3c: Trip Generation Rates Compared - Numericla Differences Assuming All Units Occupied. The ITE weekday rate for a similar facility will be 887 trips, 229 trips more than the Candlewood data will support. Data compiled in TABLE 2f: Percent Difference of Peak Rates, indicate that weekday peak hour rates for the Wichita Candlewood site ranged from 5.2 percent less than Ithe 1'1'h weekday peak hour rate, to 31.8 percent less than the ITE rate. TABLE if: Candlewood Trtp Generation Per Occupied Room (Wichita- Peak), summarizes the weekday and weekend trip end data for AM Peak hours (7:00 a.m. - 9:00 p.m.) and for PM ' Peak Hours (4:00 p.m -6:00 p.m.). Tabulated data in TABLE 3f: Trip Generation Compared - Numerical Differences Assuming All Units Occupied, show that weekday peak hour trip generation rates applied to . a standard 122-unit Candlewood Hotel will produce a typical weekday morning total of 46 trip ends per hour. This compares to a total of 68 trip ends per hour for the ITE peak weekday morning rate of 0.56 trip ends per occupied room. Afternoon peak hour rates for the same Candlewood hotel, based on the measured data, will be expected to produce 66 trip ends for the normal weekday. ITE data indicate a total of 70 trip ends for a weekday afternoon peak hour for a 122-unit hotel. In all three cases-weekday morning peak hour, weekday afternoon peak hour and weekday daily total volume- the collected Candlewood data indicated trip generation rates lower than that shown in the ITE Trip Generation publication. I I I I 6 1 11-265 2111f 1® ilia - - o ■a■ ® . -- TABLE lc: Candlewood Trip Generation Per Occupied Room (Wichita - Daily) AM PM Daily ' Day Trip Trip Trip Occupied . AM Avg PM Avg Daily Avg Date of Week Ends Ends Ends Rooms . Rate Rate Rate Oct. 11 Friday 121 226 347 58 . : .... 2.09 3.90 5.98 Oct. 12 Saturday 53 195 248 55 0.96 3.55 4.51 Oct. 13 Sunday 82 155 237 53 1.55 . 2.92 4.47 Oct. 14 Monday _ 84 274 358 75 1.12 3.65 4.77. . Oct. 15 Tuesday 129 359 488 94 1.37 3.82 5.19 Oct. 16 Wednesday 123 309 432 93 1.32 3.32 4.65 Oct. 17 Thursday 106 314 420 66 1.61 4.76 6.36 TABLE 2c: Percent Difference of Daily Rates ITE Daily Candlewood Daily Percent Difference 7.27 5.39 -25.84% TABLE 3c: Trip Generation Rates Compared Numerical Differences Assuming All Units Occupied No. Hotel Candlewood ITE Numerical Units Daily Daily Difference 80 431.00 582.00 151.00 . 98 528.00 712.00 184.00 110 593.00 800.00 207.00 122 658.00 887.00 229.00 134 722.00 974.00 252.00 150 809.00 1091.00 282.00 ling iA Mel Llama Imo'! :._= ',^ems rp.low �� ate.. .r-Mt�•• II TABLE 1f: Candlewood Trip Generation Per Occupied Room (Wichita - Peak) AM Peak PM Peak Day Trip Trip Occupied AM Peak PM Peak Date of Week Ends Ends Rooms Rate Rate Oct. 11 Friday 29 24 58 0.50 , 0.41 Oct. 12 Saturday 15 28 55 0.27 0.51 Oct. 13 Sunday 30 21 53 0.57 0.40 . Oct. 14_ _ _ Monday 19 45 75 0.25 0.60 Oct. 15 Tuesday 32 56 94 0.34 0.60 Oct. 16 Wednesday 42 48 93 0.45 0.52 . Oct. 17 Thursday _ 24 38 66 0.36 0.58 TABLE 2f: Percent Difference of Peak Rates ITE AM Peak Candlewood AM Peak Percent Difference 0.56 0.38 -31.82% _ ITE PM Peak Candlewood PM Peak Percent Difference 0.57 0.54 -5.21 TABLE 3f: Trip Generation Compared - Numerical Differences Assuming All Units Occupied No. Hotel Candlewood Trip Data ITE Trip Data Numerical Differences Units AM Peak PM Peak AM Peak PM Peak AM Peak PM Peak 80 30.00 43.00 45.00 46.00 15.00 3.00 . 98 37.00 53.00 55.00 56.00 18.00 3.00 110 42.00 59.00 62.00 63.00 20.00 4.00 122 46.00 66.00 68.00 70.00 22.00 4.00 134 51.00 72.00 75.00 76.00 24.00 4.00 150 57.00 81.00 84.00 86.00 27.00 5.00 MI .iYi .sue -- .- -= - - - Wichita . AM Weekday Peak Hour Trip Generation- Per Occupied Room I I I • 42 -, r , r X r I T I I I - I .i I 40 I 1 I I I . _ I I u 38 J L J L 1 I 1 C I I . LLJ - I 36 I I L J F I J. I I I I H- I I 34 r I r • r r I I I n, _ I I I I V0 32 - 1 r 1 r--X r r I 1 1 I I 1 1 I \°' 3 0 X x i / - I a, 2 8 J J L L 1 1 1 - I I I I L r , I I I O 26 _ i_ s.r I I I 1 a) - > 24 -• , r r r 1 1 T Q I I I I I , I I I I II 2 2 I I 1 , I I I I _ , I I 2 _ J L J L 1 1 / , , I I I I x I I I I I I I I I I 18 I 1 l 1_ 1 I I . J I I I I i 50 60 70 80 . 90 100 110 120 130 140 X = Number of Occupied Rooms Fitted Power Curve T=a*x^b • mud MEE JIB low ,i ., .- ...., Wichita : Plv Weekday Peak Hour Trip Generation Per Occupied Room 00 rr 90 r , r , U - C w 80 a '- Do 70 1 L J L J a 60 L ' Q) I 50 r 1 r . 0 1 X - X ' > , 40 ' r X , , I X , . 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 X = Number of Occupied Rooms Fitted Power Curve T=a*x^b • IV. Omaha Site Summary Candlewood data collected for the Omaha, Nebraska, site showed a daily weekday average trip-end rate of 3.90 trips per occupied room, 46.4 percent less than the 7.27 trips per occupied room from the ITE data. The tabulated Omaha daily (weekday and weekend) totals appear in TABLE Id: Candlewood Trip Generation Per Occupied Room (Omaha - Daily), on the following page. Applying the measured weekday rate to a standard 122-unit Candlewood Hotel, the total number of trip-ends estimated at complete occupancy is 476 trips per day, as shown in TABLE 3d: Trip Generation Rates Compared - Numerical Differences Assuming All Units Occupied. The ITE weekday rate for a similar facility will be 887 trips, 411 trips more than the Candlewood data will support. Data compiled in TABLE 2g: Percent Difference of Peak Rates, indicate that weekday peak hour rates for the Omaha Candlewood site ranged from 16.6 percent less than the 11E weekday peak hour rate, to 25.0 percent less than the ITE rate. TABLE 1g: Candlewood Trip Generation Per Occupied Room (Omaha- Peak), Isummarizes the weekday and weekend trip end data for AM Peak hours (7:00 a.m. -9:00 p.m.) and for PM Peak Hours(4:00 p.m-6:00 p.m.). Tabulated data in TABLE 3g: Trip Generation Compared - Numerical Differences Assuming All Units Occupied, show that weekday peak hour trip generation rates applied to a standard 122-unit Candlewood Hotel will produce a typical weekday morning total of 51 trip ends per hour. This compares to a total of 68 trip ends per hour for the fib peak weekday morning rate of 0.56 trip ends per occupied room. Afternoon peak hour rates for the same Candlewood hotel, based on the measured 1 data, will be expected to produce 58 trip ends for the normal weekday. ITE data indicate a 1 total of 70 trip ends for weekday afternoon peak hour for a 122-unit hotel. In all three cases -weekday morning peak hour, weekday afternoon peak hour and weekday daily total volume- the collected Candlewood data indicated trip generation rates lower than that shown in the I1"h Trip Generation publication. I I I I 9 ■ W AI MIMI Mai WEIR 'Jommai j_mi '.AS :- .- .mm :tea rm.= , �- . . TABLE 1 d: Candlewood Trip Generation Per Occupied Room (Omaha - Daily) AM PM Daily Day Trip Trip Trip Occupied AM Avg PM Avg Daily Avg • Date of Week Ends Ends Ends Rooms Rate Rate • Rate June 13 Friday 143 211 354 87 .1.64 2.43 4.07 June 14 Saturday 62 189 251 86 0.72 2.20 2.92 June 15 Sunday 36 199 235 103 0.35 1.93 2.28 June 16 Monday 91 316 407 119 0.76 2.66 3.42 June 17 Tuesday 148 328 476 118 1.25 2.78 4.03 June 18 Wednesday , 152 337 489 130 1.17 2.59 3.76 June 12 Thursday 162 264 426 101 1.60 2.61 4.22 - TABLE 2d: Percent Difference of Daily Rates ITE Daily Candlewood Daily Percent Difference 7.27 3.90 -46.35% TABLE 3d: Trip Generation Rates Compared Numerical Differences Assuming All Units Occupied No. Hotel Candlewood ITE Units DAILY DAILY Difference 80 312.00 582.00 270.00 98 382.00 712.00 330.00 110 429.00 800.00 371.00 122 476.00 887.00 411.00 134 523.00 974.00 451.00 150 585.00 1091.00 506.00 TABLE 1 g: Candlewood Trip Generation Per Occupied Room {Omaha - Peak Hour) AM Peak PM Peak No. Day Trip Trip Occupied AM Peak PM Peak Date of Week Ends Ends Rooms Rate Rate June 13 Friday 42 40 87 0.48 0.46 June 14 Saturday 23 30 86 0.27 0.35 June 15 Sunday 10 26 103 0.10 0.25 June 16 Monday 36 66 119 0.30 0.55 June 17 Tuesday 47 59 118 0.40 0.50 ., June 18 Wednesday 56 58 130 0.43 0.45 June 12 Thursday 49 42 _ 101 _ 0.49 0.42 TABLE 2g: Percent Difference of Peak Rates ITE AM-Peak Candlewood AM Peak Percent Difference 0.56 0.42 -25.02% ITE PM Peak Candlewood PM Peak Percent Difference 0.57 0.48 -16.62% TABLE 3g: Trip Generation Compared - Numerical Differences Assuming All Units Occupied Occupied Candlewood Trip Data ITE Trip Data Differences Units AM Peak PM Peak AM Peak PM Peak AM Peak PM Peak 80 34.00 38.00 45.00 46.00 11.00 8.00 • 98 41.00 47.00 55.00 56.00 14.00 9.00 110 46.00 52.00 62.00 63.00 16.00 11.00 122 51.00 58.00 68.00 70.00 17.00 12.00 134 56.00 64.00 75.00 76.00 19.00 12.00 150 63.00 71.00 84.00 86.00 21.00 15.00 a ARM :inner Alarm .111100M ..-- _- . - -- - - .. , , Omaha : Av WeeKcay PeaK - our Trip Generation Per Occupied Room - I I • 57 r l r ' T T , I 5 r r r T c 53 r -, ,- r W L_ I J L J �/ L 1 W T I I , U /1 J J L L x-- 1 I 1 I > 45 - , I , 43 , r , , r L , Cll 41 , r T r r _ I : , r r 7 r -� li 39 I I I I F I 37 - L } I I ' ' I x I - I , , � ' 35 J L _I L L 1 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 X = \ umber of Occupied Rooms Fitted Power Curve T=a*x^b Oa !MINIM .mama .�..� -- Omaha : 'V WeeKcay PeaK. - our • Trip Generation Per Occupied Room 70 - r r r >G Cn C 60 X W ' Q ° 5 0 - U a) X (a) An - J L 1 1 o a) - II .30 J J L L L 2050 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 X = Number of Occupied ooms Fitted Power Curve T=a*x^b • V. Denver Site Summary Candlewood data collected for the Denver, Colorado, site showed a daily weekday average trip-end rate of 3.93 trips per occupied room, 45.9 percent less than the 7.27 trips per occupied room from the ITE data. The tabulated Denver daily (weekday and weekend) totals appear in TABLE le: Candlewood Trip Generation Per Occupied Room (Omaha - Daily), on the following page. Applying the measured weekday rate to a standard 122-unit Candlewood Hotel, the total number of trip-ends estimated at complete occupancy is 480 trips per day, as shown in TABLE 3e: Trip Generation Rates Compared - Numerical Differences Assuming All Units Occupied. The ITE weekday rate for a similar facility will be 887 trips, 407 trips more than the Candlewood data will support. Data compiled in TABLE 21i: Percent Difference of Peak Rates, indicate that weekday peak hour rates for the Denver Candlewood site ranged from 7.7 percent less than the 1Th weekday peak hour rate, to 25.0 percent less than the ITE rate. TABLE Ih: Candlewood Trip Generation Per Occupied Room (Denver- Peak), summarizes the weekday and weekend trip end data for AM Peak hours (7:00 a.m. - 9:00 p.m.) and for PM Peak Hours (4:00 p.m-6:00 p.m.). Tabulated data in TABLE 311: Trip Generation Compared - Numerical Differences Assuming All Units Occupied, show that weekday peak hour trip generation rates applied to a standard 122-unit Candlewood Hotel will produce a typical weekday morning total of 63 trip ends per hour. This compares to a total of 68 trip ends per hour for the ITE peak weekday morning rate of 0.56 trip ends per occupied room. Afternoon peak hour rates for the same Candlewood hotel, based on the measured data,will be expected to produce 52 trip ends for the normal weekday. 1:11,data indicate a total of 70 trip ends for a weekday afternoon peak hour for a 122-unit hotel. In all three cases -weekday morning peak hour, weekday afternoon peak hour and weekday daily total volume -the collected Candlewood data indicated trip generation rates lower than that shown in the ITE Trip Generation publication. I I 12 IA in Ili Iituuea aMEl uAMM imam a MEMO I -- TABLE le: Candlewood Trip Generation Per Occupied Room (Denver-Daily) AM PM Daily Day Trip Trip Trip Occupied AM Avg PM Avg Daily Avg • • Date of Week Ends Ends Ends Rooms Rate Rate Rate June 20 Friday 145 239 384 91 L 1.59 2.63 4.22 June 21 Saturday 90 195 285 72 1.25 2.71 3.96 .. June 22 Sunday 84 211 295 107 0.79 .1.97 2.76 June 23 Monday 111 350 461 122 0.91 2:87 3.78 June 24 Tuesday 131 328 459 131 1.00 2.50 3.50 June 25 Wednesday 116 360 476 126 0.92 2.86 3.78 June 19 Thursday 160 348 508 116 1.38 3.00 4.38 • TABLE 2e Percent Difference of Daily Rates ITE Daily Candlewood Daily Percent Difference 7.27 3.93 -45.92% TABLE 3e: Trip Generation Rates Compared Numerical Differences Assumin All Units Occu ied No. Hotel Candlewood ITE Numerical Units Daily Daily Difference 80 315.00 582.00 267.00 98 385.00 712.00 327.00 110 433.00 800.00 367.00 122 480.00 887.00 407.00 134 527.00 974.00 447.00 150 590.00 1091.00 501.00 TABLE 1 h: Candlewood Trip Generation Per Occupied Room (Denver- Peak Hour) AM Peak - PM Peak No. Day Trip Trip Occupied AM Peak PM Peak Date of Week Ends Ends Rooms Rate Rate June 20 Friday 45 37 91 0.49 • 0.41 June 21 Saturday 20 33 72 0.28 0.46 June 22 Sunday 28 20 107 0.26 0.19 June 23 Monday 62 49 122 0.51 0.40 June 24 Tuesday 66 52 131 0.50 0.40 June 25 Wednesday 70 52 131 0.53 0.40 • June 19 Thursday 63 62 116 0.54 0.53 • TABLE 2h: Percent Difference of Peak Rates - ITE AM Peak I Candlewood AM Peak I Percent Difference 0.56 l 0.52 -7.72% ITE PM Peak Candlewood PM Peak I Percent Difference 0.57 0.43 -25.03% TABLE 3h: Trip Generation Compared - Numerical Differences Assuming All Units Occupied No. Hotel Candlewood Trip Data ITE Trip Data Numerical Differences Units AM Peak PM Peak AM Peak PM Peak , AM Peak PM Peak 80 41.00 34.00 45.00 ' 46.00 4.00 11.00 98 51.00 42.00 55.00 56.00 4.00 13.00 110 57.00 47.00 62.00 63.00 5.00 15.00 122 63.00 52.00 68.00 70.00 5.00 16.00 134 69.00 57.00 75.00 76.00 6.00 18.00 150 78.00 64.00 84.00 86.00 6.00 20.00 ® ® M Denver: AM Weekday Peak Hour Trip Generation Per Occupied Room 80 - r r r • U 70 _ C W - a- X X 6O J L J L n� 6 • W U a) 50 ` a.> • on 40 1 r r r r (1) 3 O — I _ I 20 i 1 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 X = Number of Occupied Rooms Fitted Power Curve T=a*x^b 1§111 N Yam® ® M - Denver: PM Weekday Peak Hour Trip Generation Per Occupied Room 70 - . s I cn X 60 - w a f- a' 50 _ 1 x U � � I N a 40 0 x ' a5 30 - J J 1 i • 20 1 L 50 60 70 ., 80 90 100 110 120 130 .140 X = Number of Occupied Rooms Fitted Power Curve.T=a*xAb 5-3(- Lc) ( .% A. Nl F. 7f , • �t/JO n First American Title Insurance Company Regional Commercial Division 2101 4th Avenue, Suite 800, Seattle, WA 98121 Phone: (206) 728-0400 or (800) 826-7718 ORDER NO. 394032-5K REF: 21814 TO: FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE CO. CHICAGO, IL 30 NORTH LASALLE STREET, SUITE 310 CHICAGO, IL 60602 ATTN: MICHAEL CHANG U ; 1.1 Commitment For Title Insurance Lam'Ga l Or RE g 1 �g99 • ISSUED BY MARCe,\ ED First American Title Insurance Company Ile Agreement to Issue Policy FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY,herein called the Company,for a valuable consideration,hereby commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance,as identified in Schedule A, in favor of the proposed Insured named in Schedule A, as owner or mortgagee of the estate or interest covered hereby in the land described or referred to in Schedule A,upon payment of premiums and charges therefor,all subject to the provisions of Schedule A and B to the Conditions and Stipulations hereof. This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the proposed Insured and the amount of the policy or policies committed for have been inserted in Schedule A hereof by the Company,either at the time of the issuance of this Commitment or by • subsequent indorsement. This Commitment is preliminary to the issuance of such policy or policies of title insurance and all liability and obligations hereunder shall cease and terminate six(6)months after the effective date hereof or when the policy or policies committed for shall issue, whichever first occurs,provided that the failure to issue such policy or policies is not the fault of the Company. This Commitment shall not be valid or binding until countersigned by an authorized officer or agent. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the Company has caused this Commitment to be signed and sealed,to become valid when countersigned by an authorized officer or agent of the Company,all in accordance with its By-laws. This CommitmentkWuve as of the date shown in Schedule A as "Effective Date." _ ��'�+ First American Title Insurance Company v ��',�r • BY1 "))424€-4PRESIDENT J:'i i N C C 4 A. 1 A BY /�/ / l 1 ASSISTANT SECRETARY r K f Page 1 First American Title Insurance Company Regional Commercial Division 2101 4th Avenue, Suite 800 Seattle, Washington 98121 (206)728-0400 / Fax (206)448-6248 Toll Free 1-800-826-7718 Order No. 394032-5K REF: 21814 COMMERCIAL TITLE OFFICER: MIKE N. COOPER PHONE: (206) 728-7229 COMMERCIAL TITLE OFFICER: LANCE LEWIS PHONE: (206) 615-3257 COMMERCIAL TITLE OFFICER: ROB RANCOURT PHONE: (206) 728-7234 FAX NO.: (206) 448-6248 SCHEDULE A 1. Effective date: October 28, 1998 at 7:30 A.M. 2. Owners proposed insured: CANDLEWOOD HOTEL COMPANY, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION 3. Policy/policies to be issued: Amount Premium Tax Extended Owner's Coverage $8,000,000.00 Standard Portion $10,700.00 $920.20 Extended Portion $ 3,210.00 $276.06 4. A fee simple interest in the land described in this commitment is vested, at the Commitment date in: SUSAN K. MCLEOD, WHO ALSO APPEARS OF RECORD AS SUSAN N. MCLEOD; STUART C. NESS; AND STEVEN A. NESS, EACH AS TIMIR RESPECTIVE SEPARATE ESTATES 5. The land referred to in this commitment is described in Schedule A-2. 6. ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 1-34, Block 36, HILLMAN'S EARLINGTON GARDENS #1, Vol. 17, P. 74. 7. Tax Account No(s).: 334040-6261-06 & 334040-6260-07 8. Property Address: 900 SOUTHWEST 16TH STREET RENTON, WASHINGTON 98550 Page 2 SCHEDULE A2 Order No . 394032-5K DESCRIPTION: LOTS 1 THROUGH 34 IN BLOCK 36 OF C.D. HILLMAN' S EARLINGTON GARDENS ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SEATTLE, DIVISION NO. 1, ACCORDING TO PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 17 OF PLATS AT PAGE (S) 74, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF VACATED THOMAS AVENUE SOUTHWEST (83RD AVENUE SOUTH) ADJOINING OR ABUTTING THEREON, WHICH UPON VACATION, ATTACHED TO SAID PREMISES BY OPERATION OF LAW; EXCEPT THE EAST 40 FEET THEREOF, VACATED BY CITY OF RENTON ORDINANCE NO. 3195 ; EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY NO. 1 BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 5443689.. • Page 3 • Exhibit "B" DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS WHEREAS, the Austin Company, a firm incorporated in the State of Washington, is the owner of the following real property in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington, described as follows: Block 36, C. 0. Hillman's Earlington Gardens Addition, Division 1, Volume 17 of Plats, Page 74, Records of King County, Nashington. WHEREAS, the owner of said described property desires to oimoose the following restrictive covenants running with the land as to use, present and future, of the above described real property. NOW, THEREFORE, the aforesaid owners hereby establish, grant, and imoose restrictions and covenants running with the land hereinabove described with respect to the use by the undersigned, their successors, heirs, and assigns, as follows: SETBACKS No buildings, structures, or storage shall be per- mitted or located (a) within sixty (60) feet of • S W. 16th Street, (b) within :o.-ty (40) feet of FA.4r,, (c) within twenty (2J: feet of the east rronerty line, and (d) within twenty (20) feet of the west property line. LANDSCAPING • The first twenty (20) feet adjacent to the south, west, and east property lines and the entire set- back area along the north property line shall be landscaped and maintained as landscaped areas in a neat and clean manner, except for City approved driveway and sidewalk areas. The remainder of the setback areas that are not required to be land- scaped may be utilized for access and off street narking. Detafled landscaping plans for any development of the subject property shall be sub- mitted to and approved by the Renton Planning Department. A bond, certified check, or other City approved method shall be posted with the City in the amount of 1507. of the estimated cost to insure proper installation and maintenance of all reou red landscaping. OUTSIDE STORAGE -he outside storace of materials, products, con- � GePla strurt,on eauioment, supplies, and containers �! �. ��, shall be Derntttee rit'iir: the uuildaSle area of s, .MIMMOM.MILc voraaarmalm the above described prope-Ly, provided such storage area is screened from all adjacent property lines by a wall or view obscuring fence not less than eight (8) feet nor more than ten (10) feet in height, together with a minimum five (5) foot landscape strip suitable for screening purposes. USES At1D DESIGN } Uses and design of the above described property shall be limited to offices, warehouses, or other similar - 1 uses compatible with the area subject to approval of the Renton Planning Department. SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN Any site development plans for the above described property shall first be submitted to and approved by the Renton Planning Department. SIGNS Signing shall be limited to one (1) wall sign per developed street frontage, together with one (1) . ground sign (as defined in the City of Renton Sign Code) along S.W. 16th Street. The size, design, materials, sign copy and colors of all signing • shall be subject to review and approval of the • Renton Planning Department. Additional signs com- patible with the existing development may be permitted upon review and approval of the Renton • Planning Department. DURATION These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31, 2050. Any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants may be enforced by property legal procedures in the Superior Court of • Kino County by either the City of Renton or any property owners adjoining subject property who are adversely affected by said breach. THE A T OMPANY � - . (C. R. Winr,) Vice res} ent t District Tanager • SrtsGRRYat 'au1 S. Chiado fis3istar.t District t4anarjer STATE OF WASHINGTON) COUNTY OF KING On this 4th day of . . February. _ . 19 77 , before me personally appeared _ C_ R_._ wing ys�: to me known to be the lt y�r�..prrs� THEcict 4a.—C ��17i illvxx*Au ofOFIPANY, the corcora!ion that executed - 2 - the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instru- ment to be the free and voluntary act of said corporation far the uses and purposes therein mentioncJ, and on oath stated that they were authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. • OM WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. • ... \ • Notary Publicptn and for the State,of Washington. residing at f� _• l �_. o { O O �O .. — STATE OF WASHINGTON) r` COUNTY or KING ) I On this 14th day of February , 1977 , before me personally appeared Paul S. Chiado to me known to be the Assistant District Manager of THE AUSTIN COMPANY, the corporation that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary' act of said corporation for the uses and purposes therein• mentioned, and on oath stated that they were authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of saic: corporation. I. WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. • .�. Notary Publi in and for the State of • • : �`= Washington, residing at .. I - 3 - LLIfldl.f7c SI g2_4 FILED for Record at Rowed of c‘.1 egi On I ga41114,4 X rs• RENTON MUNICIPAL BLC moor .vuzz. L. REN-rort.WASH. NQU • • • .. / NOTICE 1 ORDER NO. 94 032 SUBDIVISION \—' ,,,,,� C.a4.._.•J,;1.4..J Cadc,.‘ This Sketch is furnished as a courtesy only by First American RCDG NO./VOL & Pa vi lick- Title Insurance Company and it is NOT a part of any title N OTR IJE• SEC 2- TWNSHP L RNG 4- commitment or policy of title insurance. This sketch is furnished solely for the purpose of assisting in 11 locating the premises and does not purport to show all highways, roads,or r.vmnl,ts affecting the property. No reliance should W E be placed upon this sketch for the location or dimensions of the property and no liability is assumed for the correctness thereof. J s w �- 41 ' -�' :re 2475 52 �> ? � 49 50 51 , st-\ 'oaoky4 3 v 9 e 4 qN / • 42 43 44 45 k. (5• j45 , ; ,o° N 12 %, •1 • • PL '' N 15g 59 4D 41 ‘SpjN ' 4 3 2 1 ° a • . r38 1,4 S. ,W 5 p; N5 z4,, �;TRWii v 34040 N , 13 12• 1� 0 110 a ` 23 2:4 3• ? 15 4 Li I' 21 22 • MA a. . . : : 0 (4C . : :53, ' 55 56 R S.N.No•l>. . 5 3 0.51 tie. S. 405 C 7 F :4g pc.>. • . • 45:46 47'48 13 12 `1 : • : : 43:44: e4-29.00i atid. • :38.3g. ,�O�N St fi• '•.5• ' 4 3 w. . . 5• • g • 1 •42'1'�'�3/5 • • • • • • �1ICI A 14 /tr. 406/17 0a: g�_1�v7s:� w to 40 Y Z— ir' %co•6° 34 h " 15 /105.PS, 3 1 /li.s.i N• (36) o ITla �s '° rs" 0 27 r S�q Z� 31 ' 3 0 18 ` 4''Sis/1 4• 1336.37w41•77-- �. s16 6 1 ?6 4 e � 6t6t ifS /_ _ r_ ea st` ' ° . y 3° 1 VI`Q 30 .- +--^, c `g° 7 r � Za vi � ' g -t nc <,—� � c v2 d P37 e° �' • u r }�'," 2,00 21 22 25 24 25 26 1 27 28 29 z 1 2 21 24 25 1 a IP 19 �0 21 2; 23 24 25 2b 27 28 29a_ u� 1 S.wl. I6TH ST. 4C)i. 60na/As „Poi !/O /O S✓rr hi, //4Z 'S. /53 QD vs Sew 1 I 1 ,.a° SCHEDULE B - SECTION 1 Order No. 394032-5K Requirements The following requirements must be met: 1. Payment to or for the account of the Grantors or Mortgagors of the full consideration for the estate or interest to be insured. 2. Proper instrument(s)creating the estate or interest to be insured must be executed and duly filed for record. Conditions and Stipulations 1. The term "mortgage",when used herein,shall include deed of trust,trust deed,or other security instrument. 2. If the proposed Insured has or acquires actual knowledge of any defect, lien, encumbrance,adverse claim or other matter affecting the estate,interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment other than those shown in Schedule B hereof,and shall fail to disclose such knowledge to the Company in writing,the Company shall be relieved from liability.for any loss or damage resulting from any act of reliance hereon to the extent the Company is prejudiced by failure to so disclose such knowledge. If the proposed Insured shall disclose such knowledge to the Company,or if the Company otherwise acquires actual knowledge of any such defect,lien,encumbrance,adverse claim or other matter,the Company at its option may amend Schedule B of this Commitment accordingly,but such amendment shall not relieve the Company from liability previously incurred pursuant to paragraph 3 of these Conditions and Stipulations. 3. Liability of the Company under this Commitment shall be only to the named proposed Insured and such parties included under the definition of Insured in the form of policy or policies committed for and only for actual loss incurred in reliance hereon in undertaking in good faith(a)to comply with the requirements hereof,or(b)to eliminate exceptions shown in Schedule B,or(c)to acquire or create the estate of interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. In no event shall such liability exceed the amount stated in Schedule A for the policy or policies committed for and such liability is subject to the Insuring provisions,exclusion from coverage,and the Conditions and Stipulations of the form of policy or policies committed for in favor of the proposed Insured which are hereby incorporated by reference and are made a part of this Commitment except as expressly modified herein. 4. Any claim of loss or damage,whether or not based on negligence,and which arises out of the status of the title to the estate,interest or the lien of the insured mortgage covered hereby or any action asserting such claim,shall be restricted to the provisions and Conditions and Stipulations of this Commitment. NOTE: Effective January 1, 1997,and pursuant to amendment of Washington State statutes relating to standardization of recorded documents,the following format and content requirements must be met. Failure to comply may result in rejection of the document by the recorder. FORMAT: Margins to be 3"on top of first page, 1"on sides and bottom, 1" on top,sides and bottom of each succeeding page. Font size of 8 points or larger and paper size of no more than 8 1/2" by 14". No attachments on pages such as stapled or taped notary seals; pressure seals must be smudged. INFORRMATION WHICH MUST APPEAR ON THE FIRST PAGE: Title or titles of document.If assignment or reconveyance reference to Auditor's File Number of subject deed of trust. Names of grantor(s)and grantee(s)with reference to additional names on following page(s),if any. Abbreviated legal description(lot, block,plat name or section,township,range and quarter section of quarter section for unplatted). Assessor's Tax Parcel Number(s). Return address,which may appear in the upper left hand 3" top Margin. Page 4 SCHEDULE B - SECTION 2 Order No. 394032-5K General Exceptions The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company. A. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records. B. Any facts, rights, interest, or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of said land or by making inquiry of persons in possession thereof. C. Easements, claims of easements or encumbrances which are not shown by the public records. D. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, or any other facts which a correct survey would disclose, and which are not shown by public records. E. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) Reservations or exceptions in patents or in acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) Water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b), or (c) are shown by the public records; (d) Indian tribal codes or regulations, Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, including easements or equitable servitudes. F. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material theretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. G. Any service, installation, connection, maintenance, construction, tap or reimbursement charges/costs for sewer, water, garbage or electricity. H. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate, interest or mortgages thereon covered by this commitment. Page 5 SCHEDULE B - SECTION 2 CONT. SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS Order No. 394032-5K 1. LIEN OF THE REAL ESTATE EXCISE SALES TAX AND SURCHARGE UPON ANY SALE OF SAID PREMISES, IF UNPAID. AS OF THE DATE HEREIN, THE EXCISE TAX RATE FOR CITY OF RENTON IS 1.78%. LEVY CODE: 2110 2. LIABILITY TO SUPPLEMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR GENERAL TAXES ON IMPROVEMENTS. IT APPEARS IMPROVEMENTS SUBJECT TO ASSESSMENTS ARE LOCATED ON THE PREMISES BUT THERE IS NO ASSESSMENT THEREFOR. 3. MATTERS OF EXTENDED OWNER/PURCHASER COVERAGE WHICH ARE DEPENDENT UPON AN INSPECTION AND AN ALTA SURVEY OF THE PROPERTY FOR DETERMINATION OF INSURABILITY. PLEASE SUBMIT A COPY OF THE ALTA SURVEY AT YOUR EARLIEST CONVENIENCE FOR REVIEW. OUR INSPECTION WILL BE HELD PENDING OUR REVIEW OF THE ALTA SURVEY AND THE RESULTS OF SAID INSPECTION WILL BE FURNISHED BY SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT. 4. UNRECORDED LEASEHOLDS, IF ANY, RIGHTS OF VENDORS AND SECURITY AGREEMENTS ON PERSONAL PROPERTY, AND RIGHTS OF TENANTS AND SECURED PARTIES TO REMOVE TRADE FIXTURES AT THE EXPIRATION OF THE TERM. 5. RIGHT, TITLE AND INTEREST OF MSI INVESTMENTS L.L.C., A WASHINGTON LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AS TO THE HEREIN DESCRIBED PROPERTY AS DISCLOSED BY THE APPLICATION FOR TITLE INSURANCE. WE FIND NO RECORD OF THE PARTY(S) HAVING AN INTEREST IN THE PREMISES. 6. EVIDENCE OF THE AUTHORITY OF THE INDIVIDUAL(S) TO EXECUTE THE FORTHCOMING DOCUMENT FOR NISI INVESTMENTS, L.L.C., A WASHINGTON LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, COPIES OF THE CURRENT OPERATING AGREEMENT SHOULD BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO CLOSING. (CONTINUED) Pa e 6 Order No. 394032-5K 7. A CERTIFICATE OF GOOD STANDING FROM THE STATE OF DELAWARE FOR CANDLEWOOD HOTEL COMPANY, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, SHOULD BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO CLOSING. 8. RELINQUISHMENT OF ALL EXISTING AND FUTURE RIGHTS TO LIGHT, OK— VIEW AND AIR, TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHTS OF ACCESS TO AND FROM THE STATE HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTED ON LANDS CONVEYED BY INSTRUMENT: RECORDED: JUNE 22, 1962 RECORDING NO.: 5443689 IN FAVOR OF: THE STATE OF WASHINGTON 9. EASEMENT, INCLUDING TERMS AND PROVISIONS CONTAINED o� THEREIN: RECORDED: MAY 7, 1981 RECORDING NO.: 8105070498 IN FAVOR OF: PACIFIC NORTHWEST BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY FOR: UNDERGROUND COMMUNICATION LINES AFFECTS: THE SOUTHERLY 15 FEET OF LOTS 17 THROUGH 20 AND THE SOUTHERLY 15 FEET OF THE WESTERLY 20 FEET OF VACATED THOMAS AVENUE SOUTHWEST (83RD AVENUE SOUTHWEST)(EVANS AVENUE) 10. A RECORD OF SURVEY RECORDED MARCH 10, 1998 UNDER RECORDING NO. 9803109003` SAID SURVEY DISCLOSES THE FOLLOWING MATTERS: ENCROACHMENT OF CHAIN LINK FENCE ONTO PROPERTY ADJOINING ON THE WEST. Special Notes: A: GENERAL TAXES FOR THE YEAR 1998 WHICH HAVE BEEN PAID. AMOUNT: $134.61 TAX ACCOUNT NO.: 334040-6261-06 ASSESSED VALUE OF LAND: $9,800.00 ASSESSED VALUE OF IMPROVEMENT: NONE (AS TO LOTS 7 THROUGH 23) (CONTINUED) Page 7 Order No. 394032-5K B: GENERAL TAXES FOR THE YEAR 1998 WHICH HAVE BEEN PAID. AMOUNT: $131.96 TAX ACCOUNT NO.: 334040-6260-07 ASSESSED VALUE OF LAND: $9,600.00 ASSESSED VALUE OF IMPROVEMENT: NONE (AS TO REMAINDER) NOTES: A. A fee will be charged upon the cancellation of this commitment pursuant to the Washington State Insurance Code and the filed Rate Schedule of the Company. B. An abbreviated legal description is required by the County Auditor if the full legal description IS NOT contained on the first page of all documents to be recorded. PS/ejh Pate 8 Form No. 1755 Commitment,Conditions aid Stipulations COMMITMENT Conditions and Stipulations 1. The term ""mortgage," when used herein, shall include deed of trust, trust deed, or other security instrument. 2. If the proposed Insured has or acquires actual knowledge of any defect, lien, encumbrance,adverse claim or other matter affectini the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment other than those shown in Schedule B hereof, and shall fail to disclose such knowledge to the Company in writing,the Company shall be relieved from liability for any loss or damage resulting from any act of reliance hereon to the extent the Company is prejudiced bo failure to so disclose such knowledge. If the proposed Insured shall disclose such knowledge to the Company, or if the Company otherwise acquires actual knowledge of any such defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter, the Company at its option may amend Schedule B of this Commitment accordingly, but such amendment shall not relieve the Company from liability previously incurred pursuant to paragraph 3 of these Conditior s and Stipulations. 3. Liability of the Company under this Commitment shall be only to the named proposed Insured and such parties included under the definition of Insured in the form of policy or policies committed for and only for actual loss incurred in reliance hereon in undertaking in good faith (a) to comply with the requirements hereof, or (b) to eliminate excep tions shown in Schedule B, or (c) to acquire or create the estate of interest or mortgage thereon covered by thi! Commitment. In no event shall such liability exceed the amount stated in Schedule A for the policy or policies committed for and such liability is subject to the Insuring provisions, exclusion from coverage, and the Conditions and Stipulations of the form of policy or policies committed for in favor of the proposed Insured which ;Ire hereby incorporated by reference and are made a part of this Commitment except as expressly modified hereir. 4. Any claim of loss or damage, whether or not based on negligence, and which arises out of the status of the title to the estate o interest or the lien of the insured mortgage covered hereby or any action asserting such claim, shall be restrict id to the provisions and conditions and stipulations of this Commitment. 4. r KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: RE .NO '81.078O6 „ =r For good and valuably ,:onsi..erat on, receipt whereof is ,.eieby acknowledged. the undersigned hereby grants a perpetual easement to PadNc Morthr:est Bell Telephone Company. a Washington Corporation, its successors and assigns.with :,le right to place.construct.operate and maintain. in;nect•reconstruct,repair,replace and keep Clear undtr .round communication lines • with wires, cables, fixtures and appurtenant as attached thereto, as the grantee may from time io time require, upon, across, over and/or under the following described property CO situated in KihR W3shin�ton county,state of V O Lots 17 through 20, Block 36, C. 0. HILLMAN'S EARLINGT011 GARDENS ADDITION O L`) NUMBER 1, as recorded in Volume 17 of Plats at page 74 and also that O portion of Thomas Avenue Southwest (83rd Avenue South) (Evans Avenue) CO vacated under Ordinance number 3195, all located in the Southeast .xuarter (SE 1/4) of Section 24, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. Said easement being the southerly fifteen (15) feet of said Lots 17 through 20 snd the southerly fifteen (15) feet of the westerly 20 feet of said • r� vacated Thomas Avenue Southwest (83rd Avenue Southwest) (Evans Avenue). 631aL Grantee is subject to foiling conditions of easement. Grantor shall be notified friprior to construction of any further utilities with written notice subject 4.� r_. . , to approval from grantor to place such utilities or repair such utilities. j :'...,. "�g,t., This agreement is for this one installation and any additional underground work et-1st also have and individual right-away easement for each and every new installation. Grantee shall be responsible for all damage caused to t ' ill ' Grantor by the of- the rights and privleges herein granted and shall �+ restore the rig ht-of-way to the condition +,-1 or b�t-ta.c. 5�i 775.ar CY-sway Tb 774hE CZA,v7a.Z. '''� ie // A., .. All labor, material and other expenses that are incurred by Pacific Northwest �/• Bell Telephone Co. shall be at their expence. Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Co. shall not charge Russ or Susan Brown or any future owner, now or any time A • in the future, any fees or costs for the construction of underground communi- I. ; cation lines on this property. All costs shall be born and fully paid for at Pacific Northwest Bell expence. •� .•f Grantee shall at all times have the right of full and free ingress to and egress from said property're all purposes herein • l-•1' '- mentioned,and to remove at any time,any or all of the r •s:'•%.�'.- underground communication lines �is and/or wires.cables,fixtures and appurtenances from the said property,with the understanding that grantee shall be i' 1-CO responsible for all damage caused to grantor by the exercise of the rights and privileges herein granted. M1r S- ;j,,' �1 The rights,conditions and provisions of this easement shall Inure to the benefit of and be binding'''.1-; upon the heirs. ., executors,administrators.successors and assigns of the respective parties hereto. .. 3i''••t / r+� �'!+ In witness whereof the undersigned has executed this instrument this c{ day of•. . .'( 9�r ' Russ Brown if 4. '�r ;...;11 .. r tt '•r ,i� ,II r - Witness: By: / /GQ.rJ r _,iy husband • :r, sa., t 05 7 *0498 )'p y(3=�y / RECO F 3.0n K}►t(i ;-,,. •. CRSHSL w it 1.,., (t^dhidual Acknowledgment) Ca . 1' wl vi -.. _ , ) ( poste Acknowledgement)--t: ikyvi .:.;• STATE OF L-/il: ."9117r STATE OF n 4cp'lj ;' ' ./ sy j 1 r...«: COUNTY OF G//Nc )) as. J COuf:TY or • l-lrsti•',/$'..- On this,day personally apyeared before me On this._day of .19 - a• •r �t4-t 7 v"`"_ before me personally aopeared ' 1...S S. ."kit.'. v `a'e' to me known to be the individual_described In and who executed the within and foregoing instrument• and acknowledged that �••'•.•• - - „1r '- to me known to be the .�•�.• ;,->'.; ` - signed the same as /L free and ...j.••�•':! ..s ts'il vofuntartj act and deed, for the uses.and purposes therein .,� mentioned, Mo i •~ ` wYR iiWren under rry/hand and otrcial sea Iltis-'� af O day- of the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument.:end ' tti ` of• ' ,41' �`. -- 7 1q:L./-._- acknowledged sad instrument to be the free and voluntary act and '1'..:. ...... po anon, for Iho uses and , y q" • ,,�L mentioned,and on oath stated mat was/were �c�. .itt• .' Notary Public in and�.1he..tate of -/I/LLeieG-.r ,✓ authorized to execute sald instrument- %''"'E �f t .rea:ding at .(�' -•,5p, In witness whereof 1 have hereunto set my hand and affixed my �•; jt ..,1 �. • - Dato //-1jz9,t/,d)( .- official Boat Me day and year first above written. • _. v fi r. a i ) ,- M -' •1.. ., . �•' y -IZ,-- i i _ sy„L fC --�/ - - Notary Public In and for the Slate of - .'i _ -°r..�111 y ' . • - - •. t ' , a n1;Ds.-„._t_.. : residing at t• sy.t . v 42d0 t) tip. •.. v�,.1 -t4_tax. LIMITED ACCESS WARRANTY DEED- ' `. F -- — :2 fi•.. 1a the:Natter of Primary State Highway No.1, Jct. S°.T1 110.2-1I to Jct. - PSH NO.2 in Renter., : +'; °' KNOW ALL MEN BY•THESE PRESENTS,Thnt the Grantor. t" B&- Ha IS:ACSON, a d.dru . t; .74 r.nr. CN.. ..4..2 n • ,r'l• for and in consideration of the sum of -- ($10.00) Ten and NO/iCC -------Dollars. ='••. and other valuable consideration • tr hereby convey s and warrant s :o the STATE or WAstttticro\, :he fototoing described real estate 4;? - situcited in King County, in the State of �.cshington, to the y • "`same extent and purpose cs if the rights herein granted had been acquired under Eminent Domain.:trtutc o the State o Washington: .:•.•t c f f 9 '�^ - All those portions of Parcels "A", "3" and "C" of the follo•,rini described ^:act " " 2 irC •.: ' . ' • witti_n a strip of land 200 feet in width, being 1C0 feet on each side of the center line :i?s w'"' of Prim r,S`..ate Hirrhvay NO.l, Jct. SS 1:0. 24-1 to Jct. of PSH 1:0.2 in. Penton.. =1'' e. ".• i_:C• '+ "X": '^ �k.,. Parcel "A": Lots 1 to 12 inclusive in. Block 3 ; :": • = Parcel "3"t All of Block 36; '..- • ;- Parcel 'C"t Al]. of clock itC; r` Al]. in C.J.!-:i11r,:ts Esri:ton Gardens A:.ii-;3on to the City of Seattle, Division 1 •t - --- _3 per alit recanted in Vo]u-e 17 of Flats, page 7ln, recora..s of King County; cituata•in t-_ tr.c City of Rer.ton, County of King, State of riashinrtcr.. ^x Fig'• ' The grantor herain reserves the right to remove the roie--csnts from the iondi herein -�;': canveyed, assring all ].is it tr to persons and/or propert.7 connected with said .rer.wial, ';;; -x •at-any ti.- until August 1$, 1962; however, on said dato,-.all i- --overe-its yet re.-siring, or parti:l],v re-cairi.�,•mon said lands shall become,the.property of the State of Washing- ' ' ton W d zl righte of the grantor to said inoroteaerts'shall tee.n cease and tor_- ._:ter It ;,; • !:`:-• • s tz•. erstood and agreed that the State of Washington;:its'atttiuorizel azents or ass_•ns, �'.- '•',_ - �sll..st:ve-the-right•to-enter.upon_the.remining.?.ads:of,.the grantor, her Lei:-s c:, suces:ore r _-~ or as .�ns; wh ere necessary to rcectsplish the rya:or l of said i:pzo'rer its. .also, the grintor herein cents end lints to the State of ashi i.-toa all :-:,-=its of iir;ress and egress (includi_ng all existing, ft-ture or potential easements of access, ]_':`:t, - •view .nd.ai r) to f_from and be t-.ce_n said Pr tuna.y State Highway '0.1 Jct. S - 'O.2-. to Jct. - - frr- of T''. i.. Pe 2 i' ntond the renainder of said :'•act 'IX". ' s ^yte:lards being co:vefed here Z contain an area of lOzt-780 slnnare feet, more or 1033, t:.c . .->~•:* spec.fic.details7cane_-grog. all!of:tifnich are to.be foond: thi-t_st certain nap of r icord •c • d on file in the aft ce.of the Director of•Highwa/=- mad a-at Q1ympia, ana oearix c.i e of ap r --. ..r s-a).-1G/31/ol;and-.rerised farch6,•1562 end the:center;lira of which is also shown of re- . '� :cord is 3ook 2 of ct*�aua,7-Plajts, pages 185'6id 186, rccoras'Of'said County. ..- �.... • VMTMUMMY Dm*=nu ...Ai t9t:lyt"Y- •-!• i. o` - i ' —:I••, 1 Parcels 171.11 • IV -1R C J. .) .. .tl • •<+ N }* }� v' V r_- r.,r t.• tf. 4.:.. •••••••-••••••• : • iiii . :.)=,.!........,...!:M..-.t . , ,..,.... A..-.:.....,..•.,-:. .. ....,..-:.=!•,..;;;.-;•....; =. :-..t.. •:5;'*'..).-. .1..'4.1...?*!,. . A.---. i.Y. •••-, • .f.•••••4-1.•:-..:-)*::-.tcl`t':: 1......... ''''' .' •.:........,..1.'".x:,. •,....';T.ol:r•....•; .4.v-.:, •-::--'..*c..,..-0- __:,•-e•,- - ••••'-.4-'4,4,7„"' •'.."., _4' ;.:•.ft.ti,....!•!.:..";':.....4•-••,,,,,..A... ?;i1;:tflf.':rt..4:......:":1; •'• .•tits:". ..r.....kl.le: ..s•-":111,:'....-._:'..4r,..":":1-1 _ •sie.,e, .4/.•,t..-!. --- . ' ''''---"'` !•li-'4, .:,......,,'. .......'',.;:.*P..,';',;•-•1‘e..- ! '---."-• , tio,_.,..._ ....,, ..;..-4..'• ,s:.74,:t..;•-...A-z,„,-9.-.- • • -,..,•:, ,..)„„_ . '. ...,r,... 04r..,:t.,-4, - , • , :„,..,,„..:4•.,;,.,-r ::-- -`-----;•401011:r-e ii ,..- F;.'.:•-..1..?..c.z.-.1-;'....''4- "az,mt* ..,,-.-1.1,,,-_, , 4- i..,: :,-.1...iirt,c4.t.22;?.,-,...P.,..,-. .::....,,..,....,.-..,--. ?,:. : . .VOLmAiqii.-111i2 :-._. •*:*::::•!`-'•::-•:-'-'',-':),:;,..v,"`-! ?-'1,i4,-,:f.k,-•':,-,',,,.Wyg,i• -0- f."•-_ ....F...77-'• . • -4_,.i.-.-..-.-.,-,..:•-,:•••„.i....;.-.;;-;•ft•-, ... -• .-:•,-.,.•-••:,..;1.11.....- ,•,,,---..-,411--.-Ffv- e!,-;le,,y,:11:;•, •----'•-'--..e ', -V- ; - '.•I.R.7.,. ...:'„ -.. -,- •s-.-•:-.4:-.,•-:.. .••.•:: •,"-.:. • • •-•s: .--.•:1,-„,-.....,.v: 0,..s. ....1 ..:, ,..,-•,,,4t,,-,.:-.4,,-.7..•.-,-..0--. -..-1-...... . ••• .- •_-•- - . --,--,-,-'--•::,:-•,----,,,-.-----;,,,:1-,ezz-,r.-_,t-tf.,‘I.-, •-d.z.)-Irs-,--3.•,,,4-1:.1,. ..,,,...:7-•,:•:•••:;:-.1.,-•-..--•,...t:-- -. • = 7•41i-::A-- ,., . . - :•,..,,..44•41.'•..• •_ -•-- • ._ -.It is understood and agreed,that-Owe • 31,Teedsialitarqby•Uneter(esid:that the terms .. .......t',,,:1•1•:: - .-.-• ' and obligations hereof:MU not Pectrtbindr4twoitIquiTtate:of Vañngonitii2e,I and wstil accepted - 7.. "• •''' and approved hereon in toriting for,ihit?46Wittitingti241;32)eparlinent:Of fiii6hwaysk by the Chief ., • • . • , _, ...,...,,,,•-f.,.....:., ...,,,--....- -,,,-:...., ),.t......• •_,• •-,-_:---•,-.--,-.1.i...--•-•,, 4.- • - a.) Right of Way*fent. . -„ •••_:! -.,,,,- -,:-„...J,••• -'-1*7.:211‘,,if-.4:. •-• -•-,-.•--.•' ----47. •---.. ••. •ir- .-.. .......-.„.: „.....,.,, .. _ . . . ..:.•_.:::1.....,,s1..._ Dated this.•_...-....V.S.te_.:.....cicy of.. .113:7',1"2962:::"::--,': :-•-:"•-•:, ' ' : '..- '-•,••-.-,•-:,-. '' , .•••:,,,t,14.....4,:.....!. .- c.c.. ...• • ...... . .• .:„: •- . . . . . . .. , • e•-• • • • • • • •• -• • • - . • - ....-.,. v7,, ___• ' , lr ' • • • • ' - - • ji.,:..1.:-..!riet.- . . . •- • •••• • • — • • --- - .7--:.••• Accepted and approved .. . . • i.....i.:.11:-.:-.'1,, •- ..... • - • ..• - • ...,::7* •.'....".......s•,........‘. .. .. .. . _. -,:..r. ST - •F WASIIIIIGTON.-- . • ••••• ••• - - • ' - It - •,.7::' 1•••a••• .. p- OT:HICHWAYS-',.•;'• ,-":1.-•'-..;:!,: ... 7- • . . . . .(,' ,• ,,,. orneyed . ...,:.. -. .. • . : •••.--. -.-;...,..: 1 A.... , ....:.;•.: - By......;.'"• --,.:-.4'...e .:::•. • - Chief Right a/Way Aglat.-..•- .•-1•••*. . . "...; .1%.-. . :',. . 1..1 Ig:::' STATE Or WASHINGTON, . .- • ••. .. • • iv:lir, ..•,,C. -_-.,„,. . .•- : . . County of_-1.C.A.1.18___ __.._ '•,'- ,.- •• . . I,the undersigned,a notary public in and for the State of Washington, hereby certify that on 4 21: 'Ilk ••ZIA_..day of......)10:rx_.1962_,:,,__.._____.____.:._i_.. _._. - - _persona I ly appeared before me ., ...,...?..:...L., 1•- ..:.-.30,... • -- -..i.:..-J,„,i_ • - • . .. . ::... ,,...0...i“..,:«t:..`,':-..Bertha.Ixaacosnt:..!...:..._._z....::..... .1.....::._.. ..... -.......,..--•- ,,.• •-•" •a.:;t ,, • .7•-• .f:.17; .z4•;•• 1._. - . • .. . _ .z.:-.... -•-4. .. ... • - - to ktnik•:'Ialcivoil,ilk-bethe inr".4-'• -' 34criberVin and who executed the foregoing instrument, and ,„r .-•- -,- :,•-.ialie.ig.z\.-._, •F ••••• . acIcteito* ho;_.P.fa . __signed and sealed the scpwas_.1_243Y-__-..-free and voluntary act and deed, :..: - .•-•-:',..:...,0%,.+ icir-likp-setkpillf..Pirposes therein mentioned..• •• ••..--. :.. . . . ..• . , • •" . Given;..-u;14,4yr my hand and'official sear the day*and:Year:last bone. "tten. ' • ,•• • • . • -.. .-.. . . . •.. ....,,,..„.•,, .... .....i.,_ . _ . _ . . . . .___ . • _---. . • .. . . -:-Nolan./Pubiacini. i the St Washington. •%:•... .•• .... .-. .. . • • .' tiaA••• , s. „ • .,. • .. , . .•••:...•:•••.-",.•:•7:••;::... . . .•„ . . • ..'.".----•iti"*.....14:rk:-.116,-tt:?.•'.***"."%.• .•••••'...•`:•'r:,.'•• :..t...:`..-, . -: . -. • . . !.'- F , ' -'. ....,, ..,.,•,: •- _ . F: -:-.. ". ' --::::- ,' 14..••4.-40:fra-T704--41:;;•.71-•••:'•:-.': -. •••.'.'.•,..• •;-.,.•:.11...77,7::t-•..7v.,.wasirric :.z--:.•..4..:s, .:-•:-.;•••....1.1rcrare2:,iV,,.. --°' . . - .......•: . •.f:...............S. .V•7...• ...... : . .. . 1":..:.- :••••;1.,:...'..d.N...,..•.1•:‘...,....- .•............-....',' '...........•........r. ...1.` . ' .. „.,... ..................,:,..,..:.y,.,,k,:..7..ji.... ..,:t.:.••..‘A..••••••:A 0 .....;‘,1••.7.47-.3.±.:i...,:.7..r.Z.f..02...., —'..::•..-........-z.:•<-1.-tuir1/44-,....—:,.. • • ../:. : •;• -'•. '`. 4- • . • . r-.7-. • . . , . - ' i • -:-.• ."- --- ,- . • .,. . ••. ,•, ' •-- • ';r....-.' •-•• • ... .• • -• .., ef.: - i, : • .•-. ... . - 7-.• -. ","--..:-.;"-1'7.•''''. ;...c.••.. • "' •. • ...•. : - "". 7:':.".".' • • .. ',• ....-...(. .--,...:.. ,.....1..‘-14a.-44-•-6,•,..... .........., -......."4••-,,r " •i...1 j • •••.44. -...-4.4.4:64,,,44•-•44f4rf ....•I tr,..,-4-i 4. N;--.•i..• •• .---.4 ,_,.. .. . .- •4. : . •-: : ... . A . , c..;=. = - ' ' 1 - . _ . . • , . .-•....- . .4..:.... -, ;.:cr4.z--..-• i' -.-g I, - • .• :_:_-_-.L.L-_.__:::-...,:...... . .• . . _ • .... _..,........;:„ . .... . ..-.c._. • .s.. 4.: I- _ '-'..". -V' 1:rj4 "...-% ' i • 0 I .-••••••':RECORDED.•:•-•••• - - a g .,s-i- . u ... ..., .- . - '.. • : vel.-....::-.-. ..._• . g ::-.:. .,„ t.-a'. . •- ..- ••,... .. ... . •• ...,PAGE --..:.»....;:.' RET.EST CF . 4- .g 4 1,f,I,"i .43: -': • • • ,.•-- . • ,:'X • i ' 44 • * I • ••••-•:•••,-:1•:&-.744-----5•,/-±•9:!--:', • - - •-• •:-• •-i t 2:4-:' • •N• ; s - ..,-_. .7aN...- , -..e - g >. 3 ,;,-- : .••-----• •.•• -;!-•..v=•-•- - . : 3.1 !• r.,,,- -- ... •....- -.- ...:....::,.192.111, :Isal.12 25, .... ; is ..,:t :co.• 8. . .:, .- ;. .-..=21 . ; cz, , .. •_,,..---, .,- .:—:-„..- • • -- - - . :b.1-.,..1 ,•-= -.. • ...;..• q, ,• 0 ' I . 7,'..'-'.7:41,7:•:•,'"':',.:!".'i.,...'..::: • . . q ;g,......:2 "Zr " • '.-' 2! . • . - ' I - •L'.4:7 :,r•-":•"-:•‘.7 42 ':-'...--. .• R; : . _ G .,.. 1,...,. Of. '- 44 -• ., ..,,,4-.1:litntS L A.--F J- r.,- ii-. - . -...F.. •% Q..,..e... , . i ,- .... .. . . 77•• - •••••..s1 . r :;;)"...•*.•'`••-"•-•-;:r '''''''.2"• T'f''''.'' .---.".:.:- '•-• ''-;....to.: .-.'*".•:::::1:7.1.1'''''''4.--14-.•,--'2::q(:.•_'..:1-.1'1.----.:12'.'!-T..-?-..--?<-.'"',_,.-.4;,11-.;• :1.---77-,!---",,,7 ...e:i'a 7,..."-";--i...t.'"-j-1,-,-.;t4p;•".'"0.,. • ,- . ... -:-. '-'''. • '' ::.- ' '• E-4-* ••• I-: ---,' ';',-*:i.v..4.- _ - - ,'-..-"-- : -'•",..',. . 1---:-, . ,..... ..4). •I 7,.-7,1 ;i -..r..rzi.. ,,17-7 .; •••• .:.-. I: 1.171:.tqLgr, ' .,.. ÷--; '.'. ,-.:: :-:?-4.--:',-4t . Iv ‘,....0 I-.o. ' ir..:. .-„:,.;-.. ,-.•••••:-:,..it:Alt + '.. ... - •••• ....I....y: /S4.'"-r,•%3•E",C) "..... •''''.."•-• ..;;;;.4:'....,p, .1-21.!?F.I 34 • .. • •.NV..''.. - :.'. • ..;!,.4 I i..7.,...,...-. ...1. l'4,1141-;3.,--,.....[.-„,- ,,-:.,.• •-.-.1:t •?..f.:;,--'.,re,i...S.!..56-.41--.'-•no1 • '',• •,..': :-.-',-,,,,......71-4,6 ‘lit 4141140.7. ;4;47-i'-/! 1.. ' . '.. -"ft - s.": .. ...,.. •-•'.4•it,Ci,rati,t8r.S6..j,.4.1.-6 4:47 z:r..:-.,"......4........41...1714;41.....-•-7paz.:..-.F..:.Ail.3,44-.- 'a.roi. O..4'-se#,.'1 -,r"i:.. ":72•-• -:•{.."‘'...:;*.r..4.?4 ..'"s:'..•••••.', . .:::4)'. '1'4;-...',.• .2. .1,1.7.,.-..e••: ..a.• : -....: •it. - Mardi IMMO Pargr I NM .••• fl • • SECTION 24, T. 23 N., R. 4 E., W.M. R.O.W.• g ¢50.41. L0.7,SiA.U14N.0 i' MI 8 —T at.nnl.s7.11A 147.714 SR 405 (P.S.H. No. I) _� —� r--� IIII' ryea(.IY(.) .ee-»' .iOATL�_ T WALL ,•-W r"-'' i ) 1 2 ! 1 e l• I D 1 ' oRAh.0 SCAL1 r I ! . • 1 I •1 1 i� I S nAt..peu.., -i.-I a 17 r�• 1 I 1 1 g , 1 i K��'..slr can• s -1 -1 9 1 I 1 �I 1 / NCIW TY LAP - 1' tt I t0 1 1 1 1 '..1 1 1 [rose a Sal:• R.O-W. • 13 ,12I • 1 • i ! 1 i 1 -.1.--1. -- I .r T. —� • '•W! .w• 1 1 ' I i .0 2oi tFCAt f)riCRIPT)QN$ .0 1 ' I 1 1.- 1.-'1- i 20 40 1 I M 1 ►I O% 9Y rw1T AL06^Jw 17111 < 1 I I _ --?-1...1J•/ 1 .. I 1 I PARCEL'A• (kIM.S.IIw) 1--1. •--•-- -- --'- 01 Wo 1-e N t.1.24-$. boob)e M C. NR..4n•.Ces.ela.C..... AM1L le M 1 t. E I--I--'_- I I > 1 1 I (Ty if1my 17 of 1141•74....4..e4•1M,..1 _ 1 C I41+arWN TOC 1l 17M C 14 � I < I 3� 1 H.114 eelp 7 e.erY n CM • 1 3 15 I I. ./ 1 I y 1 (S.)i r....S.. 7•&W d •ro tempted NanT 0.......r..., y .1 vt 36 (e s.....,.s.v)«}s l U..l.t [}C>?T P4 Coot a/..1 I.rl. I t•� BLOCK I I ' i 1 . wortw►7 w.ah W Awtan ov.....11...rw neat a/nT root i V/ 1 PARCEL'A' 32 . r 1 ..: M1n...•..,..I.IMO riot../14.r.. ...1..h....7 ri.1.r•I•we7 "•� '--.--.--.-..._... I ¢4 I 1 < 1 N. I.►7..y r.o........ew...e M.Mr 544.).N..1W.1M I Q..! -+.--•--.--.--.--.-1 I ' L] 1 1....Cow.17 el lay Oa..M lr.ww.lw. SS I > y7 BLOCK • U< r p to PARCEL'B'1, )t 1 1 BLOCK 1 Z y, 1 PARCEL r(a.w a.C�q 1 >_ 1 • • • 1 1 • O Qg for 7-:a e1.�.M w C. .i.w•.Crs.pa.Grow..YVw. 1.w 1 = -.--.-T.--•--.�-.--.--.-� 1 ) I I d7M s.e1w 0.r1..1..1....rd.t.M.1.t ...../.r.s.MM i W 19 1 30 1 W 1 I Y< I 1 W..w..17 M Hot..►Y.74 Mon..M 0'4 CrI}...I....t1I. 1 (1 • 11x UM.eo I 1 "C ! 1 K L 1 OfCDT INN Me..on.wr..I.M SLI.M nr...p..M Mw7 i ; i ; i-.;-.;...r.;-•r- -•r-r—i 1 10 t\11.0 w 1 }l{ht. 1 sun.W...f w 1.' w.Iw.N R�wrsy M..ra IN 7M.. s h I r.Il\.aC.a1..11.I Mooted 14..o Carl 1Dy SW M 1 < un r/4 0...1 3 1 1 g 1 I 1 I 1111 I I 1 1 I l y I e H n'~K ttr I b 1 1 ►.1 r. ..T awl.ly w...r 124.177 k K(let ..r) 1 `, 1 1 1 1 1 1 1• 1 •1 •1 •1 I a >t 0 1 i I .....1r 1 ;'� 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2. i I - ! �M I. 1134 4orower Cowl,0..lowato of�a Ir.77021 1.1.1404 10701...1/K.�ess.s N. — -- -- -- -�40 17 I to 1 t9 1 20 1 21 1 22 1 27 24 1 23 I sot 27 1 211 1 29 r'. a 1 1 • 1 if ; ; 1 yap' t 1 l 1 r _ J 1—�—'- />L.,1.rw-- -- -- lx_ _R SW 161h SWEET .Ina (FOURTH AVE) - w Cor R ���� ":e R Nortrin(HAT CALL) MSS d 1101040 -1334.24711LAT CALL) 1234.01 0I) R PM N 1..e—_ --._- --.-_ --.-_ _ --.--.--.-_._-._ Fos cost.47.4•OM - 1 a I701 . j t I nT'Y PROC TOuRf.AND fC2)1PLENT `f 80310�j003 v�.1� a,.a,....le. LEGEND 10I1Y.1. 10p4fR.M .. • . • WCw.sKt.ale a C1>am.x MA SEEM. .....11Vt norc rae.0.Ono1-.W n ItA7 ',esrss+w rr.oarl AUDITOR'S CGR)11CATi food r marl.+. eel•41 II—41__..._.tl.. P.W_-.r SURKI1 A 1'N• 41 the r44444.1 .4 M �Ms1l�O 9anrra2y OIRTITICATT •- (` RECORD OF SURVEY ." THE FAR COMPANY f:,� �., F� STEVE NESS -- .1.ofSame* SIr�0 t. R1R ,Ie M n r� ..= r ►o.nA+o.wcow .. .i SECT...2MG TAP.. 23.. N.. R. A37414 . ON I COUNTY, MA SHINCTON WO VA-23211 , .aMei o1�19T eAT1 Nr..ct0.[4 10.000 C./be1.71►IO21e •.not. ` `-f') fC3R/ARY IMeI .rM/l7.4 am. 2rt 11CAlJ{ Ir SST tU I'-q 1 1 r 1 0 0 III BARGAIN & SALE DEED IN LIEU OF FORECLOSURE OF MORTGAGE KING COUNTY • NO EXCISE TAX DUE ! Ef tigdg(!a� In this instrument: (1) "Grantors" means: RUSSEL D. BROWN AND 1 SUSAN BROWN, aka SUSAN H. BROWN, Husband and Wife. (2) "Grantee" means: SUSAN N. McLEOD. (3) The "Property" means: Real property situate in �. King County, Washington, more particularly described as: 1 Lots 7-23, Block 36 in C.D. Hillman's i Earlington Gardens Addition to the City of i•;� Seattle, Division No. 1, according to plat a, thereof, recorded in Volume 17 of Plats, page 74, Records of King County, Washington. '= r,: '! CC RECITALS N O (1) Title to the property is held by Russel D.- roses Nand Susan Brown, aka Susan H. Brown, Husband and Wife. O (2) Title is subject to encumbrances of record and - two Deeds of Trust in favor of Grantees described as: - a. A Deed of Trust executed by Grantors in L� favor of Ness-NWFB Employees Retirement Trust on or about 2Q � _ March 1, 1983, and recorded on March 18, 1983, in the .10 County Real Property Records as Number 8303180055.-1'he nrrO I terms of the Deed of Trust were modified pursuant to the o ---� terms of a Modification of Deed of Trust dated - I September 26, 1986, which was recorded in the King County • Real Property Records on November 18, 1986, at k,-; Number 861118113. The Deed of Trust was assigned by - (j) Ness-NWFB Employees Retirement Trust to Arthur S. Ness by �, rif an Assignment of Deed of Trust dated October 31, 1986, wh ch was recorded in the King County Real Property Records d 6" on November 18, 1986, at Number 8611181115, and was further ;, assigned, as to an undivided one-half (1/2) interest, by Z i Arthur S. Ness and other mesne assignments unto Susan N. G U I d McLeod; and .A.V/1 2! c b. A Deed of Trust executed by Grantors in / favor of Ness-NWFB Employees Retirement Trust on or about 7iiu1i2-4. 407TE 1R RECV F 9.00 RECFEE 2.00 CPSHSL 4.411.00 .. rl • .. 16,.1\ ., '-\ . --, 0 0 • August 19, 1985, and recorded on August 29, 1985, in the King County Real Property Records as Number 8508290593. The terms of the Deed of Trust were modified pursuant to the terms of a Modification of Deed of Trust dated September 26, 1986, which was recorded in the King County •• Real Property Records on November 18, 1986, at f Number 861118114. The Deed of Trust was assigned by ( Ne .s-NWFB Employees Retirement Trust to Arthur S. Ness by an Assignment of Deed of Trust dated October 31, 1986, wh.ch was recorded in the King County Real Property Records on November 18, 1986, at Number 8611181115, and was further assigned, as to an undivided one-half (1/2) interest, by Arthur S. Ness and other mesne assignments unto Susan N. • McLeod. Grantors have asked Grantee to accept an absolute deed of conveyance of the Property and to forebear action against Grantors on the Promissory Notes and Guaranty which are secured by the Deeds of Trust. GRANTEi NOW, THEREFORE, Grantors grant, bargain, sell, and convey to Grantee and to Grantee's heirs, personal �y representatives, successors and assigns, all of the Property, .a with the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances belonging r. or in any way appertain4_ng to the Property, including, but not ti limited to, all of Grantor's rights in any reserve accounts for the payment of taxes, insurance or other charges attributable ace(V to the Property, to have and to hold the Property unto Grantee and Grantee's heirs, personal representatives, successors and assigns forever. CT) • This Deed is absolute in effect and conveys to Grantee fee simple title in the Property. This Deed does not operate as a nortgage, trust deed, trust conveyance or security device • of any kind. • By acceptance of this Deed, Grantee covenants and agrees that Grantee forever shall forebear taking any action • whatscever to collect against Grantors on the Promissory Notes and Guaranty which are secured by the Deeds of Trust, other than ly foreclosure of the Deeds of Trust, if necessary, and that in any proceeding to foreclose the Deeds of Trust, Grantee shall not seek or obtain a deficiency judgment against Grantors or against the heirs or assigns of Grantors. Grantors acknowledge that they desire to avoid litigztion by granting this Deed in Lieu of Foreclosure. • -2- i: I 0 0 • • • Grantors waive, surrender, convey, and relinquish any equity of redemption and statutory rights of redemption concerzing the Property and the Deeds of Trust. Grantors are not acting under misapprehension as to the lecal effect of this Deed or under duress, undue influence, or mis:-epresentation by Grantee, Grantee's agent, or attorney or by + ny other person. • The true and actual consideration for this transfer consisfa of Grantee's waiver of Grantee's right to judgment against Grantors personally under the Promissory Notes secured by the Deeds of Trust, and Grantee's waiver of Grantee's right • to deft-ciency judgment against Grantors. Grantee may retain all pa:^ments previously made on the secured debt with no duty • to acciunt therefor. Grantee does not expressly or impliedly agree to assume or to pay any principal balance of the Promissory Notes or of zny other debt, lien, charge or obligation which relates to or .s attributable to the Property. • r This Deed does not effect a merger of the fee ownerscip and the liens of the Deeds of Trust described above. • The fea and the liens shall hereafter remain separate and ' distin:t. In construing this Deed, and where the context so requires, the singular includes the plural, and all grammatical ._ changes shall be implied to make provisions of this instrument Oapplicable equally to corporations and to individuals. -i N IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantors have executed this 1 instrument this /2 day of January, 1991. USSEL D. BROWN 40?-frr? 244dyi - SUSAN DROWNl � -3- O �r .`rfr2 S!l. � =. ~ :Al ;__-•• -.. ..-. '.:�.••i\. f.1 0 0 • • STATE OF WASHINGTON // ) ss. County of /� _ I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence • that FUSSED D. BROWN signed this instrument, and acknowledged • said Instrument to be his own free and voluntary act for the purpo:es mentioned in this instrument. - DATED this /7 day of January, 1991. Q Notary Public f pWas gton� • Residing At: fl • STATE OF WASHINGTON ) • (/ ) ss. County of „ / ) • I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that SUSAN BROWN signed this instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be her free and voluntary act for the purposes CDmentioned in this instrument. (V DATED this /7 day of January, 1991. a • • No ary Public fo Wa to Residing At: @LUA IN AND SALE DEED THIS SPACE PROVIDED FOR • RECORDER'S USE RUSSEL D. BROWN and • SUSAt BROWN, Husband and • Wife, • Grantors, SUSAt N. McLEOD, Grantee. -4- • _ ti ___ .....ter ►cs�- -- -- `.`':,4-•- 0 i 0 III • r• i': i Filed for record at the request of Susan N. McLeod. f . 1 AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: i John H. Doran, Esq. I • Lane Powell Spears Lubersky ; 520 S.W. Yamhill, Suite 800 i Portland, OR 97204 i ffi . !. i • • • Q h. N 414: O r't` • . Q) ij • II -5- , • .. •:..1:::.'. •: -��.-.`;'s.L.'.i�..:�r:' �4a.'}•' ....r.F-.�`c'.`!aW-�wr •i • • • /. .is:r, T .r• { ,1...4Cafaarir' 02:ZA,PI.1- sae .. • �:.v `+�"rFt .--rc,.'-it i;r.>.:.e..-'�ir�' _ c's tia;r 0 Itte 31 Rrp After Recording Return To: John H. Doran 520 S W. Yarnhill,Suite.800 Portia rid,OR 97204 OUITCLAXM J1ORY FORM 2 The Grantor,SUSAN N_McLEOD,of Lake Oswego, Oregon, as a gift,conveys and quitclaim to STUART C. NESS an undivided ore-sixth (1/6) interest (including after acquired title)as tenant in common in the following described real estate: Lots 7-23,Block 36,in C.D.Hillman's Eariington Gardens $ Addition to the City of Seattle,Division No. 1, according to plat thereof, recorded in Winne 17 of Plats, page 74, Records of King County,Washington: situated in ti+e county of King,state of Washington. Dated this 11 day of December, 1992. CD CO , Jc,ii V37 d (-1-1-4- Susan N, Oaitchfre Deed Susan N. McLeod, Grantor Unto Stuart C. N ess, Grantee PsearwArillkili.r1311.ym E16005119 03/23/98 .00 Do =.Y_s-•..nr ._'::-•-.-_. "T ___._..,��: . :-=u__" ,i�?'?iRaa�.�rary ate.-�-��.�..T a-3�.�r.�a.�.�._---..�-� r.• •'. ._•..I ..•vS4 pr• 7• � y a- ,f-.. Fi+F+yjl'S',!fs:•V`a••,:-..v..r•y .�.....r--�•,r .�•'_ !;�� ... .�••��_ r - (i., ;. w'fi {fit • . . _ �•.Y,. ern. � , �' fig, � �yY; ... .... .p... - ::.:J.3;,r 1. i-•,aN.•e;c. sRO� 'Y,' 13'b" '1 Mlork • `q7F•.; ut.. • • • �.r •..-is`•: • • • • c. STATE OF OREGON ss. County of Iwvltnomah I cer ify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that SUSAN McLEOD is the person who appeared before me,and said person acknowledged that she signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be her fire and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned n i this instrument. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO before the this o�9k4^day of December, 1992 (hex_ Notary YPu lic for Oregon My commission expir es: 13 t0 fn O In N c, O CO 2 r.con,®usuaaoaag -— _ - - - _ ..'„.. ,.. .,,�..`T,x�-q..C• - -..r.>t.ten, �._... --- - --- �`'A...�'�S''.�' .* *. °!� • 4 �. : ,ir'.1 ..-4':r<i7'�.-::'_•--:JY.ti"C�S[:�YJII':LY_•{�.i-t:Fq:vV�,r�.;.._:��- .. .--. �..y..`.—.�.. • • • • tab I After Recordist.Return To: Robin B.Parisi Esq. Paid&Parisi • I S.W.Cotum Al.Suite 680 8 Portland,Orep in 97258 OUITCLAM DEED KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that SUSAN K. McLEOD, hereinafter called Grants r, whose address is if/S00.4.0054' Zt& .f.fAtr. Of, 97jc as a gift, convey! and quitclaims to STUART C. NF S, hereinafter called Grantee, whose address Nis 441.3 j€NKS WAS( FIK( Su MOW K/A an undivided one-sixttt(1/6) interest as G tenant in c nmmon in Inc following-described real property situated in King County, in Washington: C) Lots 7-23, Block 36, in C. D. Hillman's Earlington Gardens Addition to the City of Irfl Seatte, Division No. 1,according to plat thereof,recorded in Volume 17 of Plats,page 74, Fecords of King County,Washington. DATED this day of 1997. i.1 42 a .j, 1,7 i Susan K. McLeod STATE OF O (-r(1dl ) )ss. County of ,VCI LTdASIA ff ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on A./10)/Eite,6612- J(J , 1997, by Susan K McLeod as tier voluntary act and deed. :. aF�cut srx -'• A relate ttiatrmr `� '`„ roux(ruauc-onus Notary blic for Oregon CCOAM 9b111fQ051PCS My commission expires: /0-,2f-90 MY wpn MIRES ocr0eet n.2110 E1600590 03/25/98 .00 .00 • • • ., •••••-„ . • • • • • -.• • .„ . , • • : - •• •• • ' • • • • •••• • -• '•• • . . . . • • . . . • • - • • • • • C _ S ••• DEt 3 1 Otn •• ••P After Record ing Return To: John Doran 520 .W. Yamhill,Suite 800 Portland,OR 97204 QUITCLAIM DEED-STATUTORY FORM The Grantor,SUSAN N.McLEOD,of Lake Oswego,Oregon.as a gift,conveys and quitclai ns to STEVEN A. NESS an undivded one-sixth (1/6) interest (including after acquired till i)as tenant in common in the following described real estate: Lots 7-23,Block 36,in C.D.Hillman's&sib:iron Gardens Addition to the City of Seattle, Division No. 1, according to plat thereof, recorded in Volume 17 of Plats, page 74, Records of King County,Wuhington; Cf3 situated in tie county of King, state of Washington. 1.11 Dated this 2-r ,day of December, 1992. 1 Cs.? 0 C7) Susan 46,1-. McLeod T. Qiiitielaisti Deed Susan N. IcLuxl, Grantor Unto Steven A. Ness, Grantee PCC)PAIDJ2 WEI)}al E1600592 03/e5/98 • ••' • •s�i1x.• TI2 :i . i • fit;rryY+y�!e �t _3s t • c '/'r11fi KsRt ``s•CySw �c�,.yt• i ..« ` `: sue.° : r 9:' t? Y4�•._ tit n`?r�• - � y: a•. .7 Y•.. 44',_.S'mot'• e.h •-/' :s13.y�,t�ai' :.tip!. • '�+ ',tti • •n•;1 •:• :#' ?Vf::..- i...'i• ter.♦1v.I:•,•v••'.!. •••'C•., l, •: •.:..•`.i,• • L •J•',•1 :. .. '•/• •Y ♦1:. : P TX-?J�-:V•-�'� 'r •i-•7.'.•. N.•' • • t• • • . fg1 k•• • . • •j . STATE OP OREGON ) ss. County of Multnomah ) . I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that SUSAN .McLEOD is the person who appeared before me,and said person acknowledged that she signed this instrument and admowledged it to be her free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in this inaonunetu. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO before me this,a9 U`day of December,1992. . • Notary Fu for Oregon / My commission expires: 3/O. 1 • • • • 2 1,ConaCINu»an.11s • _ _ _- - ... ..� , �..�a,.`r.y��i.�Y.ra-4F�,vM•�.�rA'y�r� _ '•i.S. f .r% � 1 -' _..-�....._:.. .-<:. ...-...ter•:"+6t•.4e�►.n'-wo'.o-^....,.�-..- _... +Fr s.._..�r,,. K, • • • • • • • • • After Recording Return To: Robes B.Parisi, Esq. 8 • Parisi&Parisi I S.W.Columb.a,Suite 680 Portland,Otegoiw 97258 QUITCLAIM DEED s } CD KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that SUSAN K. McLEOD, hereinafter _Ocalled Granto , whose address is 4rre#st /mac D,C }7iO3s"," as a IN gift,conveys and quitclaims to STEVEN A. NESS,hereinafter called , whose address is DIS40 I•W wUektf gal L1R Irovr,OR an undivided one-eixth(1.6) interest as tenant in cc moron in the following-described real property situated in King County, Washington: Lots '-23, Block 36, in C. D. Hillman's Earlington Gardens Addition to the City of Seats&, Division No. 1, according to plat thereof, recorded in Volume 17 of Plats,page 74,R cords of King County,Washington. DATED this day of , 1997. Susan K. cLeod STATE OF 9R.EEG J ) ) ss. County of L .i 4Af+ ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on IV OVFMbt_R., /0 , 1997, by Susan K. McLeod as her voluntary act and deed. m.Z ure+ouot4.na ur a � Szssc 1 M MOGS11l1o7 Moa o xrtwu,lwtnN t7 Notary blic for Oregon tryl moose r My coromicsian expires: JO -On E1600593 03/25/98 .00 .00 • After Recording.R!.turn To: Robin B.Parisi.61. Parisi do Parisi I S.W.Columbia.Suite 680 Portland.Oregon 7258 QUITCLAIM DEED CHICAGO TfE INS.CO RREF/ 51o'137—(0 ACT KNOW ,LL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that Larry Lee 14arceaux husband of Q Grantee hereirafter called Grantor, whose address is 41 Spinosa, Lake Oswego, Oregon tJ) 97035, convey! and quitclaims to SUSAN K. McL.EOD, hereinafter called Grantee, whose address is 41 S,inosa, Lake Oswego, Oregon 97035, all of his right, title and interest in the g B Q: following-described real property situated in King County,Washington: Lots 7-23, Block 36, in C. D. Hillman's Eartington Gardens Addition to the City of Seattle,Division No. 1,according to plat thereof, recorded in Volume 17 of Plats, page 74, Records of King County,Washington, EXCEPT that portion conveyed to the 8 State ofWas ngtp7 f primary State Highway No. :_ by deed recorded under 1m jpC 944JberJ DATED this (1 day of 7Lin , 1998. 5 Larry LLre Marceaux g >c STATE OF O1;EGON ss. County of J&U 411 ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on (1tentil /5 , 1998, by L ctr xr f ee 010,,C ea ckx as his voluntary act and� 8 .- tiffiaUt U /ll.CX C A toKilm TIMM Notary blic for Oregon *4 '�f NOT My commission expires: l0-(2 8-0 0 atr cam aJ4 a rsrrs CtToeet n,tom f VIYFESS,FMOMQ,TCLA r*ED.SWAM E1636697 09/04/98 _00 .O0 o - • y ,. 25: • I `:1 '1.4 . fit:' Filed for Record at the Request of THIS SPACE PROVIDED FOR o (.;i ' Arthur S. Ness RECORDER'S USE After Recording Return to: 1, Janet E. Girrow, Esq. 6 y1'.* Cairncrose 6 Hempelmann '';e 701 Fifth avenue, 70th Floor f'` . Seattle, W' 98104-7016 0 "' O I l z,,. CORRECTION • BARGAIN & SALE DEED IN LIEU OF FORECLOSURE .' s"'"~ ..00 c:;1r OF MORTGAGE , c") In this instrument: mo ; �*•�: (1) "Grantors" means: RUSSEL D. BROWN AND SUSAN � g:.t.. O BROWN, aka SUSAN H. BROWN, a n. : Cv Husband and Wife ?^ ; • ONw .r'..:i . ; • (2) "Grantee" means: ARTHUR S. NESS I we- (3) The "Property" means: Real property situate in Fr.. '. King County, Washington, more particularly described as: vc;. Lots 1-6 and Lots 24-34, Block 36 in C.D. t • `'� Hillman's Earlington Gardens Addition to the �t• Z:., _I :: City of Seattle, Division No. 1, according to rr•. - the plat thereof, recorded in Volume 17 of .1? . z ' Plats page 74, Records of King County, Washington; TOGETHER WITH vacated Thomas W. Avenue S.W. (83rd Avenue S.) adjacent •. •• thereto; EXCEPT the east 40 feet thereof, • vacated by City of Renton Ordinance Number r. 3195; EXCEPT that portion conveyed to the • •• State of Washington for Primary State Highway �: • ' No. 1, by deed recorded under Recording Y: A .. Number 5443689, situated in the County of c King, State of Washington. J. RECITALS E (1) Title to the property is held by Russel D. Brown... ;:e and Susan Brown, aka Susan H. Brown, Husband and Wife. .-1. J " :i/.riL " '-'. ^.•1•'r-I. J il•:, i s 'f." � 4 0 11111 • • a ' • S k:, \ ff•. (2) Title is subject to encumbrances of record and two V ' Deeds of Trust in favor of Grantees described as: 1 Yt l (LU a. A Deed of Trust executed by Grantors in favorG1 of Ness-NWFB Employees Retirement Trust on or about March 1, 1 1983, and recorded on March 18, 1983, in the King County )17•1 Real Property Records as Number 8303180055. The terms of f','`•'• • . the Deed of Trust were modified pursuant to the terms of a F- •;. Modification of Deed of Trust dated September 26, 1986, which was recorded in the King County Real Property Records ; on November 18, 1986, at Numbez ou,..o•i3. The Deed of • • Trust was assigned by Ness-NWFB Employees Retirement Trust to Arthur S. Ness by an Assignment of Deed of Trust dated • October 31, 1986, which was recorded in the King County Real '•' Propert:' Records on November 18, 1986, at Number 8611181115, and was further assigned, as to an undivided one-half (1/2) interest., by Arthur S. Ness and other mesne assignments unto Susan N McLeod; ands+ b. A Deed of Truet executed by Grantors in favor \1Y of Ness NWFB Employees Retirement Trust on or about 0 :.' August .9, 1985, and recorded on August 29, 1985, e in th ///��� +'' (jr :, King County Real Property Records as Number 8508290593. The U �• terms of the Deed of Trust were modified pursuant to the terms of a Modification of Deed of Trust dated September 26,, 1986, which was recorded in the King County Real Property 1/40 Records on November 18, 1986, at Number 061118314. The Deed F.s;•;• CO of Trust was assigned by Ness-NWFB Employees Retirement Trust to Arthur S. Ness by an Assignment of Deed of Trust `a dated October 31, 1986, which was recorded in the King ;:`:' County Real Property Records on November 18, 1986, at Number • N8611181115, and was further assigned, as to an undivided None-half (1/2) interest, by Arthur S. Ness and other mesneON n. assignments unto Susan N. McLeod. Grantors have asked Grantee to accept an absolute deed of • conveyance of the Property and to forebear action against Grantors on the Promissory Notes and Guaranty which are secured • by the Deeds of Trust. • • GRANT NCW, THEREFORE, Grantors grant, bargain, sell, and convey to Grantee and to Grantee's heirs, personal • representatives, successors and assigns, all of the Property, with the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances belonging or in any way appertaining to the Property, including, but not • limited to, all of Grantor's rights in any reserve accounts for the payment of taxes, insurance or other charges attributable to • the Property , to have and to hold the Property unto Grantee and Grantee's heirs, personal representatives, successors and assigns forever. - 2 - e U • • Tile Deed is absolute in effect and conveys to Grantee fee simple :itle in the Property. This Deed does not operate as a mortgage, trust deed, trust conveyance or security device of v any kind. 1 By acceptance of this Deed, Grantee covenants and agrees that Grantee forever shall forebear taking any action whatsoever to collect against Grantors on the Promissory Notes f�• and Guaranty which are secured by the Deeds of Trust, other than ., by foreclosure of the Deeds of Trust, if necessary, and that in `i any proceeding to foreclose the Deeds of Trust, Grantee shall not seek or obtain a deficiency judgment against Grantors or against i . the heirs or assigns of Grantors. Grantors acknowledge that they desire to avoid litigation by granting this Deed in Lieu of Foreclosure. `• Grantors waive, surrender, convey, and relinquish any equity of redemption and statutory rights of redemption t" concerning :he Property and the Deeds of Trust. Grantors are not acting under misapprehension as to the legal effect of this Deed or under duress, undue influence, or misrepresen:ation by Grantee, Grantee's agent, or attorney or by any other person. i* Tee true and actual consideration for this transfer consists of Grantee's waiver of Grantee's right to judgment v against Grantors perscnally under the Promissory Notes secured by 3, (0 the Deeds of Trust, and Grantee's waiver of Grantee's right to deficiency judgment against Grantors. Grantee may retain all • NO payments previously made on the secured debt with no duty to account therefor. i5 CD N ^ . tT Grantee does not expressly or impliedly agree to assume or to pay any principal balance of the Promissory Notes or of any other debt, lien, charge or obligation which relates to or is attributable to the Property. This Deed does not effect a merger of the fee ownership • and the liens of the Deed of Trust described above. The fee and the liens e,hall hereafter remain separate and distinct. : n construing this Deed, and where the context so requires, the singular includes the plural, and all grammatical changes shall be implied to make provisions of this instrument applicable equally to corporations and to individuals. his Deed is given to correct that certain Deed between the same parties dated January 17, 199], as Auditor's File No. 910124( 734 which failed to include the vacated pertion of Thomas Avenue S.W. (83rd Avenue S. ) in the legal description. - 3 - • • t • '' • • • • .. • • • 0 r • • • • • lt.�'^..lS•ti�/f•4M�...r�.•.e�.C•i:�1�.C1�1!��:.ILL' IN WITNES WHEREOF, Grantors have executed this E' •• inatrt ment this /�ik day of ;may 1992. �•. y `: 'MUSSEL D. BROWN r.' _VP sus r = ". I 1. • CV •• - 4 - ,�• :,. t• . • • _ _•.•__w � ._1 _ • STATE OF WASH INGTON ) ) BS, COUNTY OF KING ) On this day personally appeared before me RUSSEL D. BROWN, . to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that . .. • he signed the same as hie free and voluntary act end deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. ` _ . 1VEN under my hand and official seal this /y7t�'day of NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State, of Washington, residing at , /to if/.GC/ . My commission expires //-9-9 c •, , , STATE OF WASFINGTON ) " ) ss. . COUNTY OF KING ) On this day personally appeared before me SUSAN BROWN, to me n•!!' ' known to be the individual described in and who executed the `'"`• :.. Cl within and fcregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that she .O signed the acme as her free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned.o .'•_' cv -gIVEN urder my hand and official seal this // flay of • Ch a ij , 1992. . . le/1t P/z1. ,, '-/Y NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the -• '•' • State_of Washington, residing at My commission expires //-7-9s • , a 33519.H27 . II - 5 t • • • • S K Y After Recording.1 burn To: 8Robin B.Parisi,E iq. Parisi&Parisi • S.W.Columbia Suite 680 Portland,Oregon 97738 , OUITCLAIM DEED N KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that ARTHUR S. NESS, hereinafter called Grantor whose address is 14005 S. E. 44th Place, Bellevue, Washington 98006, as a CI) gift,conveys t nd quitclaims to STUART C. NESS, hereinafter called Grantee, whose address isazi 1LN1.c 'Th (0I141 WA an undivided one-sixth(1L) interest as tenant in common in the following-descried real property situated in King Cotmty, Washington: Lots 1 6 and Lots 24-34,Block 36,in C. D. Hillman's Earlington Gardens Addition to the City of Seattle,Division No. 1,according to plat thereof, recorded in Volume 17 of Plats, page 74, Records of King County,Washington. DATF D this day of 42-`"'`"-7-2-^'/ 1997, • Arthur S. Ness STATE OF- O2E OAJ ) )ss. County of afit.T1U(lA•(Atk ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on NMEru G• tC , 1997. • by Arthur S Ness as his voluntary act and deed. �., o no.u.to A tratnrtranom ta• Lc t�/'nest 'totwtfPUkre horn Notary tic for Oregon y A 1''/2-W/OO ��. z�owe acme n.tom My commission expires: r W.NESS.GDKFZ 1 225 ORD STVAAT • E1600584 03/25/98 .00 .00 •-. ••t;:,t44('!", ;');:e14 • — • 7ittcii! . . , ,• • ..-: . • . • - slret.•;;•iselikr.-v_• f. • •. •••: • •:•••• • '••-•rx“? ...T.f*,..377:4 • " • ••••••• g;iic"Utog;'i,Z41,•,•.?4 • • ••••••• 4%Alf•rr, , :•1.•! • — • f , • ;,.• .1;•••;„i1...'••*, ..." "" • .• •.1 • ‘."`•';. •t•-:i.4-...-.?..'"•X•••••• P • • •• ,TT li* • "At•:‘• ••••••"•:1•• • • •••••••0;s3-4••-.; . • • .* • • • • • • • • • . . • s • -• . .• • - A After Recordi ig Return To: John F. Doran 520 S.W. Yarnhill,Suite 800 Portlar d, OR 97204 .78; OVITCLALM DEED -STATUTQRY FORM • The Grantor,ARTHUR S.NESS,of Bellevue,Washington,as a gift,conveys and quitclaims to;;TUART C.NESS an undivded one-sixth(1/6)interest (including after acquired title) as tenant in common in the following described real estate: r 8 Lots 1-6 and Lots 24-34, Block 36, in C. D. Hillman's P,arlington Gardens Addition to the City of Seattle,Division No. 1,according to plat thereof,recorded in Volume 17 of Flats,page 74,Records of King County,Washington; situated in the county of King,state of Washington. 0) Dated this 2/ day of December, 1992. Arthur S.Ness Da44 Arthur S. Nes s Grantor Unto Stuart C. Nes., Grantee P.cnivmNvuncurs Ei600n85 03/e5/9S .00 • .00 • $ • " i,. ' r• •LL -. .2. ., . ( 0 . ,maw•wr--. q:i,:C.I .• • i` }r�0 C�, • .. �.•. ...._..•.�•.. .. :is a' }r r' :':�'t�.. Lrtrn44.:��.�•-�}c; • • .. 4 s ca...•.,3cit...-•�M m'Y M, 1 - • • • ••% -r':1•••,:rWY.c-i::`•ty.iree,:•*'4,.!ii$:w3'•V�t4k'a c ...•. - /;•. - • ..•,:.:-.^r.: ••. 4.• -4:1..04: +..:. tine .- 4. • ':Y.:-v•� �r�_• ::KJ••-.ti:•�.f."[^'' -I•'Y.u!.;tV..i,.%'�;�4• J.._i.-. •s '•' :r; ice: :0 '.t3-.:. _ •:_ - : • .4 •••• ..fkT•`r'it=iJ::;,.�'a5,'. ic(^M"*s.,:1..••;,:::••••::47. •r••-:!' •, ::tin:.:• STATE OF WI SHING TON ) ) u• County of King ) . I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that ARTHUR S.NESS is the person who appeared before mc,and said person acknowledged that he signed this iaurcmertt and acknowledged it to be his free arid voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in this instrunin t SUMERIP1111111kfiND SWORN TO before me this a day of December, 1992• . -: tt0-l—It J/o',.t -Is •�•. }A,�= .r aide•SX �C) ''tki �ti' Notary Public for ' •;••_ on Ir. 0'•`1 j .9 V $ Residing at: ��,[,,,"to.-, ' r: i' .4SH:Nt%t O%ill? C uw.....ss:c.‘ Ey(Pt�r I�•INN 19.5 �I4EHk1110"- -a 2 g. W - i 2 r!mNsatvlta1ADJQf i ll }i r-,,_,. 33%Jx ' ti i - , .. - .-. ti.•i., :9. .:.1.,-3`>-'4:,•t • .; yry:,+ • • l • l • g i A After Reconling,Ran rn To: Robin B.Parisi,Esq. • Parisi&Parisi 8 I I S.W.Columbia,St arc 680 Portland,Oregon 9T.58 i's< 3 OUITCLAIM DEED 8 O - KNOW A.L MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that ARTHUR S. NESS, hereinafter ..-: Oa called Grantor, w lose address is 14005 S. E. 44th Place, Bellevue, Washington 98006, as a p gift,conveys and ;uitclaims to STEVEN A. NESS, hereinafter called Grantee, whose address m is jalk Slil M NI 1441( 1 r Pork Oj+; • an undivided one-third (1/3) interest as 40 tenant in comma n in the folloufing-described real property situated in King County, . Washington: Intl 1-6 ad Lots 24-34,Block 36, in C. D. Hillman's Earlington Gardens Addition to • the City of Seattle,Division No. 1, according to plat thereof, recorded in Volume 17 of ='. Plats, page 74, Records of King County, Washington. • DATED tl is day of ���+-•- --i 1997. • t • • . Arthur S. Ness STATE OF C7C•k..) ) )ss. County of snc � ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on p-ti tf I C , 1997, • by Arthur S. Ness as his volomary act and deed. �� tan tex Q- �� (�' 4 tttt�u ears .t9" iV#INN/UGMB:01 < ,„...: <.'- c Notary is for Oregon n cawas�ort itin-�rrtrs acroea n.icm My commission expires: lO f 8/p o :, A,..-:, E1600586 03/23/98 .00 .00 - ti, • t• • 11111 • • • • • • b�b 8 After Recording,F_turn To: Robin B.Parisi.E . • Parisi&Parisi 8 I S. W.Columbia, Suite 680 Portland,Oregon r7258 QUITCLAIM DEED 1N KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that ARTHUR S. NESS, hereinafter Ccalled Grantor, whose address is 14005 S. E. 44th Place, Bellevue, Washington 98006, as a gift, conveys and quitclaims to SUSAN K. McLEOD, hereinafter called Grantee, whose address is_Y_Lfp r 7. Lai[ ,LyG 9705c , an undivided one-third (1/3) interest as tenet tin common in the foll ing-described real property situated in King County, Washington: Lots 1-6 and Lots 24-34, Block 36. in C. D. Hillman's Earlingtoo Gardens Addition to the City of Seattle. Division No. 1, according to plat thereof, recorded in Volume 17 of Plats,p:ge 74, Records of King County, Washington. DATEE this day of *zi-,z-‘44-Z--.' , 1997. Arthur S. Ness STATE OF Q,?..ECS('A) ) )ss. County of A(j;JnloAu a r{ ) 'his instrument was acknowledged before me on NDI/PkiBfiZ. 10 , 1997, by Arthur S. N ss as his voluntary act and deed. at:+. 0 MIX SUL 6. Q A MK lila MIMI Notarybl is for Oregon . NM* n�ucaH.awt g �`�' � caws moan_�n osms . �� My commission expires: lOA/8h? Er600587 O3/23/98 _OO _OO • * t After Recording,Return To: Robin B.Parisi, isq. • Parisi&Parisi I S.W.Columbi i,Suite 680 Portland,Oregon 97258 o CORRECTIONGHICAGD1 TITLE NVS CO. oUITCLAIM DEED REEL J 1093'�'(0 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that ARTHUR S. NESS and VIVIAN Q FAYE NESS, husband and wife,hereinafter called Grantor,whose address is 14005 S. E.44th Place, Bellevue, Washington 98006, as a gift, conveys and quitclaims to SUSAN K. V� McLEOD, hereinafter called Grantee, whose address is 41 Spinosa,Lake Oswego, Oregon,an Q; undivided one third(1/3) interest as tenant in common in the following-described real property situated in King County, Washington: Lots 1-6 and Lots 24-34,Block 36, in C. D. Hillman's Earlington Gardens Addition to the City of Seattle. Division No. 1, according to plat thereof, recorded in Volume 17 of Plats, page 74, Records of King County, Washington; TOGETHER WITH vacated Thomas Avenue S.W. (83rd Avenue S.)'adjacent thereto; EXCEPT that portico conveyed to the State of W tshington for Primary State Highway No. 1, by deed recorded under Recording Number 5 43689,situated in the County of King,State of Washington. *vacated by City of entcn Or5inance Nvnber 3195; EXCEPT the east 40 feet of said DATE)this 3' day of Flu cu.ST ,,119998. �� vacated avenue Arthur S. Ness, Individally and as Attorney- in-Fact fpr Vi M vian Fa ess r Power of Attorney/dated June 992 1/�/'//�{]p 8 Vivian Faye Ness by Arth S.Ness as Attorney- in-Fact under Power of Attorney dated lure 30, 1992 to F1636608 09/04/98 .00 -00 : ys 'r`tx:y` :��• yt.wr.n ..*�,_ _s► wet 0 _, • STATE OF ORECiON ) )ss. County of Wash.ngton ) Thus instrument was acknowledged.'re me on Au ust 3, 1998, by Arthur S. Ness as his voluntary act and deed. �— arrikl-/L ` Notary Public for on My commission expires: 7 e3 a• OPRCIALWAt. STATE OF ORE.ON ) •J `�•/� NOTARY PUeUcOngpp4 )ss. tdYCOMWSStON CORESCOIMASSION 314311 JAY JAY 9,2002 County of Wuhington } This instrument was acknowledged before me on August 3, 1998,by Arthur S. Ness as Attorney-in-Fact for Vivian Faye Ness uncle' 'a er of Attorney dated June 30, 1992, as his voluntary a:t and deed. Notary Public for Oregon My commission expires: 7f//Oa t0 OFF •• . ,1.4411118.411 0�w1Lt h- Q� OTARY ` 14311 I �►�►'�wtrssroM n3 2 Farw,+n,uv.m.vua n4137s75vo1 -_+ 3e`rI .y •k ri +�i ' w r-`^"•"y`•`ram ' '-t.:. •_ } �i'iSM '�7^"pV 7N. 'C��• i.t'1? A • • It After Recording, Return To: Robin B. Parisi Esq. , Parisi do Parisi 1 S. W.Columbia,Suite 680 Portland,Oreg<n 97258 ammoi0NCHICAGO TITLE INS.CO. QUITCLAIM DEED REF#.. (/113?ti KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that ARTHUR S. NESS and VIVIAN FAYE NFtS,1 usband and wife,hereinafter called Grantor,whose address is 14005 S. E. 44th Place, Bellevue Washington 98006, as a gift, conveys and quitclaims to STEVEN A. NFSS, hereinafter called Grantee, whose address is 01540 S. W. Corbett Hill Circle. Portland, Oregon, an unc ividcd one-third (1/3) interest as tenant in common in the following-described real property si uated in King County, Washington: S Lots 1-6 ant Lots 24-34. Block 36, in C.D. Hillman's Earlington Gardens Addition to the City of Seattle, Division No. 1, according to plat thereof, recorded in Volume 17 of Plats, page 74, F ecords of King County, Washington; TOGETHER WITH vacated Thomas Avenue S.W. (83rd Avcnac S.)lradjacent thereto; EXCEPT that portion conveyed to the State of Washington for Primary State Highway No. 1,by deed recorded under Recording 8 Number 5443689, situated in the County of King,State of Washington. *vacated by City of Renton Ordinance Ntn>ber 3195; CEPT the east 40 feet of said vacated avenue DATED this r, day of 1998. Arthur S. Ness Vivian Faye Ness by Arthur S. Ness as Attorney- in-Fact under Power of Attorney dated June 30, 1992 F‘1[111,MSS42MJALW,IS Cfl[RFA TIA.OFF STEW,/ EJ636690 09/04/9R .0D .00 0 -' l.j • ,i .-.:..1:..sa...� ��.. ��''!t"'J�►' S�?:(4!j_ . � .. ti r A • • STATE OF ORE(;ON )ss. County of Washi)gton This instrument was acknowledged a me on August 3, 1998, by Arthur S. Ness as his voluntary act and deed. Notary Public for Oregon My commission expires: //9 • STATE OF ORE(iON y ! �M / )SS. \� .y NOT GQN County of Washi tgton ) Iff COMMISSION E7PifESJAY2,2ma Th s instrument was acknowledged before me on August 3, 1998,by Arthur S. Ness as Attorney- n-Fact for Vivian Faye Ness under r of Attorney dated June 30, 1992, as his voluntary a s and deed. Notary Public for Oregon My commission expires: + OFFICIAL MEAL FNMA 01111110AUE e„,/ NOTARY PLINZ431,E0014 COANAISSION NO.314311 w CONMLSSION EsPRES 11Y 223/ 2 c WrwScf+W413uw413.t ouac7101.1.o®.mv51. ,. 4 ., a�•ve', (.. .wn•.�!�Y"'�'�51"� r#d V�. �?1_Y!�!'y.t`.: t s • _ J. � t ►i.F-,L� .✓ ir:.: '�: e �_ � tr �' se:::r:.`.y:;._•'.';,_�.� 0 • • After Recording.Return To: Robin B.Parisi,I sq. Parisi&Parisi • I T.W.Columbia,Suite 680 Portland,Oregon 9T258 G� CORRECTION CHIGAGO MU G.CO Cr)a ( OUITCLAIM DEED REF* S1114i 1-(0 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that ARTHUR S. NPSS and VIVIAN t0 FAYE NESS, iusband and wife,hereinafter called Grantor, whose address is 14005 S. E.44th C Place, Bcllevu:, Washington 98006, as a gift, conveys and quitclaims to STUART C. NESS. hereinafter cal ed Grantee, whose address is 4823 Jenks Way East, Sumner, Washington, an C: undivided one•third(1/3) interest as tenant in common in the following-described real property situated in King County,Washington: Lots 1-6 aid Lots 24-34, Block 36, in C. D. Hillman's Earlington Gardens Addition to the City of Se::;.ttle, Division No. 1, according to plat thereof, recorded in Volume 17 of Plats, page 74, Records of King County, Washington; TOGETHER WITH vacated Thomas Avenue S.W. (83rd Avenue S.)%djacent thereto; EXCEPT that portion conveyed to the State of Washington for Primary State Highway No. 1, by deed recorded under Recording Number 5,-43689,situated in the County of King, State of Washington w ted by city 1 m of Rentor Ordinancx Nuer 3195; EXCEPT the east 40 feet of said vacated "15rTEJ this 3 day of A u Gus T 1998. �f Arthur S.Ness r I vi1l+ually anAttorney- in-Fact Attotor v 0, i19992 o r Power of AttoryT 8 Vivian Fay s by Arthur S. css as Attorney- to in-Fact under Power of Attorney dated June 30, 1992 r rll1Mr1SY.FNrJ.V:4rss roe RFL11001 6f113 MART F163669P 09/04/98 .00 .00 �'.P_ ..P'�""!�s>r.• e-.x>,:.A��+ - •�A 27111. A • STATE OF OR iGON )ss. County of Washington This instrument was acknowledged be re me on August 1998, by Arthur S. Ness as his voluntary act and dad. Notary Public for Oregon /'/0 My commission expires: / STATE OF ORi GON .) .. oiaM :r , PAMEtA Dllt, County of Washington ) PUBUGORpoom Mtn SS � H°T MY COINSMSSION EXPIRES JU Y 0.2032 This instrument was acknowledged bef c me on August 3, 1998,by Arthur S. Ness as Attorne,+-in-Fact for Vivian Faye Ness u er of Attorney dated June 30, 1992, as his voluntary act and deed. CYj No Public f ' My commission expires: 7 g/0.3- C O .. .% offlcrAl sFx O ' : PAMELA oets8LI A ` ' NOTARY PUBJGOREGON !AYCouM1ssON ECM!JUIY9.2tg 2 vUPMSST.0 NESA1'MSS cw.&cTWoDew srE�'w i�� n N:• vY�+,ry/"'".ACii:t:w_� 1.-..�;j�..ry , ,ft i "404e`• l. la x.:.^'ti:r� wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww City of Renton WA Reprinted: 03/01/99 14:57 Receipt ww1wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww Receipt Number: R9900849 Amount: 1,501.98 03/01/99 14:57 Payment Method: CHECK Notation: BARGHAUSEN26681 Init: CRP Project #: LUA99-029 Type: LUA Land Use Actions Location: 900 SW 16TH STREET Total Fees: 1,501.98 This Payment 1,501.98 Total ALL Pmts: 1,501.98 Balance: .00 wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww Account Code Description Amount 000.345.81.00.0007 Environmental Review 500.00 000.345.81.00.0017 Site Plan Approval 1,000.00 000.05.519.90.42.1 Postage 1.98 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY PROPOSED CANDLEWOOD HOTEL SOUTHWEST 16TH STREET RENTON, WASHINGTON E-8648 March 16, 1999 PREPARED FOR BARGHAUSEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Kristina M. Ellings P.E. Staff Engineer tit + A4 1 ,'. Kyle R. Campbell, P E y: 3(ri(c Ma. Manager of Geotechnic Vim?J•J.AL�- y EXs'PES 11118100 Earth Consultants, Inc. 1805 - 136th Place Northeast, Suite 201 Bellevue, Washington 98005 (206) 643-3780 Toll Free 1-888-739-6670 IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT YOUR GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT More construction problems are caused by site subsur- technical engineers who then render an opinion about face conditions than any other factor. As troublesome as overall subsurface conditions, their likely reaction to subsurface problems can be, their frequency and extent proposed construction activity, and appropriate founda- have been lessened considerably in recent years,due in tion design. Even under optimal circumstances actual large measure to programs and publications of ASFE/ conditions may differ from those inferred to exist, The Association of Engineering Firms Practicing in because no geotechnical engineer, no matter how the Geosciences. qualified, and no subsurface exploration program, no matter how comprehensive, can reveal what is hidden by The following suggestions and observations are offered to help you reduce the geotechnical related delays, earth, rock and time. The actual interface between mate- cost-overruns and other costly headaches that can rials may be far more gradual or abrupt than a report indicates. Actual conditions in areas not sampled may occur during a construction project. differ from predictions. Nothing can be done to prevent the unanticipated, but steps can be taken to help minimize their A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING impact. For this reason, most experienced owners retain their REPORT IS BASED ON A UNIQUE SET geotechnical consultants through the construction stage, to iden- tify variances, conduct additional tests which may be OF PROJECT-SPECIFIC FACTORS needed, and to recommend solutions to problems encountered on site. A geotechnical engineering report is based on a subsur- face exploration plan designed to incorporate a unique SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS set of project-specific factors. These typically include: the general nature of the structure involved, its size and CAN CHANGE configuration; the location of the structure on the site and its orientation; physical concomitants such as Subsurface conditions may be modified by constantly- access roads, parking lots, and underground utilities, changing natural forces. Because a geotechnical engi- and the level of additional risk which the client assumed neering report is based on conditions which existed at by virtue of limitations imposed upon the exploratory the time of subsurface exploration, construction decisions program. To help avoid costly problems, consult the should not be based on a geotechnical engineering report whose geotechnical engineer to determine how any factors adequacy may have been affected by time. Speak with the geo- which change subsequent to the date of the report may technical consultant to learn if additional tests are affect its recommendations. advisable before construction starts. Unless your consulting geotechnical engineer indicates Construction operations at or adjacent to the site and otherwise, your geotechnical engineering report should not natural events such as floods, earthquakes or ground be used: water fluctuations may also affect subsurface conditions •When the nature of the proposed structure is and, thus, the continuing adequacy of a geotechnical changed, for example, if an office building will be report. The geotechnical engineer should be kept erected instead of a parking garage, or if a refriger- of any such events,and should be consulted to ated warehouse will be built instead of an unre- determine if additional tests are necessary frigerated one: •when the size or configuration of the proposed GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES ARE structure is altered; PERFORMED FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES •when the location or orientation of the proposed AND PERSONS structure is modified; •when there is a change of ownership. or Geotechnical engineers' reports are prepared to meet •for application to an adjacent site. the specific needs of specific individuals. A report pre- Geotechnical engineers cannot accept responsibility for problems pared for a consulting civil engineer may not be ade- which may develop if they are not consulted after factors consid- quate for a construction contractor, or even some other ered in their report's development have changed. consulting civil engineer. Unless indicated otherwise, this report was prepared expressly for the client involved and expressly for purposes indicated by the client. Use MOST GEOTECHNICAL "FINDINGS" by any other persons for any purpose, or by the client ARE PROFESSIONAL ESTIMATES for a different purpose, may result in problems. No indi- vidual other than the client should apply this report for its Site exploration identifies actual subsurface conditions intended purpose without first conferring with the geotechnical only at those points where samples are taken, when engineer. No person should apply this report for any purpose they are taken. Data derived through sampling and sub- other than that originally contemplated without first conferring sequent laboratory testing are extrapolated by geo- with the geotechnical engineer. A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING der the mistaken impression that simply disdaiming re- REPORT IS SUBJECT TO sponsibility for the accuracy of subsurface information MI'.INTERPRETATION always insulates them from attendant liability. Providing the best available information to contractors helps pre- Cos ly problems can occur when other design proles vent costly construction problems and the adversarial sion:Is develop their plans based on misinterpretations attitudes which aggravate them to disproportionate of a :eotechnical engineering report. To help avoid scale. thes• problems, the geotechnical engineer should be READ RESPONSIBILITY retai ed to work with other appropriate design profes- Sion. is to explain relevant geotechnical findings and to CLAUSES CLOSELY revi:w the adequacy of their plans and specifications relat ve to geotechnical issues. Because geotechnical engineering is based extensively on judgment and opinion, it is far less exact than other design disciplines. This situation has resulted in wholly unwarranted daims being lodged against geotechnical BO' ING LOGS SHOULD NOT BE consultants. To help prevent this problem,geotechnical engineers have developed model clauses for use in writ- SE'ARATED FROM THE ten transmittals. These are not exculpatory clauses ENI INEERING REPORT designed to foist geotechnical engineers' liabilities onto someone else. Rather, they are definitive dauses which Final boring logs are developed by geotechnical engi- identify where geotechnical engineers' responsibilities neer- based upon their interpretation of field logs begin and end. Their use helps all parties involved rec- (ass- bled by site personnel)and laboratory evaluation ognize their individual responsibilities and take appro- of fie d samples. Only final boring logs customarily are priate action. Some of these definitive clauses are likely incluoed in geotechnical engineering reports. These logs to appear in your geotechnical engineering report,and should not under any circumstances be redrawn for inclusion in you are encouraged to read them closely. Your geo- archi ectural or other design drawings, because drafters technical engineer will be pleased to give full and frank may .ommit errors or omissions in the transfer process. answers to your questions. Alth.ugh photographic reproduction eliminates this problem, it does nothing to minimize the possibility of OTHER STEPS YOU CAN TAKE TO cont .ctors misinterpreting the logs during bid prepara- tion. hen this occurs, delays, disputes and unantici- REDUCE RISK pate. costs are the all-too-frequent result. Your consulting geotechnical engineer will be pleased to To minimize the likelihood of boring log misinterpreta- discuss other techniques which can be employed to mit- tion, sive contractors ready access to the complete geotechnical igate risk. In addition, ASFE has developed a variety of engin.ering report prepared or authorized for their use. materials which may be beneficial. Contact ASFE for a Thos- who do not provide such access may proceed un- complimentary copy of its publications directory. Published by ASFE THE ASSOCIATION OF ENGINEERING FIRMS PRACTICING IN THE GEOSCIENCES 8811 Colesville Road/Suite G 106/Silver Spring, Maryland 20910/(301) 565-2733 0788/3M its 4 0 `�� �I Earth Consultants Inc. J Geotechnical chnical Engineers.Geologists&Environmental Scientists • March 16, 1999 E-8648 Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. 18215 — 72nd Avenue South Kent, Washington 98032 Attention: Dan Balmelli Dear Mr. Balmelli: We are pleased to submit our report titled "Geotechnical Engineering Study, Proposed Candlewood Hotel, Southwest 16t Street, Renton, Washington." This report presents the results of our field exploration, selective laboratory tests, and engineering analyses. The purpose and scope of our study was outlined in our February 10, 1999 proposal. Based on the results of our study, it is our opinion the proposed development is feasible from a geotechnical standpoint. In our opinion, the proposed building may be supported by driven timber piles obtaining end bearing support in the dense to very dense sand and gravel or on augercast piles embedded into the dense to very dense sand and gravel provided the recommendations contained within this report are incorporated into the final design and construction specifications. We appreciate this opportunity to have been of service to you. If you have any questions, or if we can be of further assistance, please call. Respectfully submitted, EARTH CONSULTANTS, INC. Kyle R. Campbell, P. E. Manager of Geotechnical Services KME\KRC\bkm 1805-136th Place N.E.,Suite 201,Bellevue,Washington 98005 Bellevue(425)643-3780 FAX(425)746-0860 Toll Free(888)739-6670 TABLE OF CONTENTS E-8648 PAGE INTRODUCTION 1 General 1 Project Description 1 SITE CONDITIONS 1 Surface 1 Subsurface 2 Groundwater 2 Laboratory Testing 2 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 3 General 3 Site Preparation and General Earthwork 3 Foundations 4 Timber Piles 5 Augercast Piles 5 Settlement and Horizontal Loads 6 Slab-on-Grade Floors 6 Seismic Design Considerations 6 Excavations and Slopes 7 Site Drainage 8 Utility Support and Backfill 8 Pavement Areas 8 LIMITATIONS 9 Additional Services 10 APPENDICES Appendix A Field Exploration Appendix B Laboratory Test Results ILLUSTRATIONS Plate 1 Vicinity Map Plate 2 Boring and Test Pit Location Plan Plate 3 Utility Trench Backfill Plate Al Legend Plates A2 through A9 Boring Logs Plates Al through A18 Test Pit Logs Plates B1 and B2 Grain Size Analyses Earth Consultants, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY PROPOSED CANDLEWOOD HOTEL SOUTHWEST 16TH STREET RENTON, WASHINGTON E-8648 INTRODUCTION General This report presents the results of the geotechnical engineering study completed by Earth Consultants, Inc. (ECI) for the proposed Candlewood Hotel located on the north side of Southwest 16' Street in Renton, Washington. The general location of the site is shown on the Vicinity Map, Plate 1 . The purpose of this study was to explore the subsurface conditions at the site, obtain pertinent geotechnical engineering data and based on this information, to develop geotechnical recommendations for the proposed site development. At the time our study was performed, the proposed building location and our exploratory locations were approximately as shown on the Boring and Test Pit Location Plan, Plate 2. Project Description It is our understanding the proposed development will consist of a four-story hotel with associated parking. Based on the site plan provided, the parking area will be raised two to four feet. The proposed building will have a finished floor elevation of 21 .2 feet, which is four to six feet higher than existing grades. If any of the above design criteria are incorrect or change, we should be consulted to review the recommendations contained in this report. In any case, ECI should be retained to perform a general review of the final design. SITE CONDITIONS Surface The subject site is located on the north side of Southwest 16th Street in Renton, Washington (see Plate 1, Vicinity Map). The property is rectangular in shape, extending about 320 feet in the north-south direction and 410 feet in the east-west direction. The site is bounded on the east and west by commercial developments, on the south by Southwest 16th Street and on the north by Interstate 405. The site is vegetated with deciduous trees up to two feet in diameter and a few blackberries. Thick blackberries exist on the west side of the site. The site is relatively flat with less than four feet of elevation change across the site. The site is three to six feet lower than Southwest 16th Street. A small wetland exists on the northwest corner of the site. Earth Consultants, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. E-8648 March 16, 1999 Page 2 Subsurface Our explorations consisted of drilling four borings and excavating eight test pits at the ap- proximate locations shown on Plate 2. Please refer to the Boring and Test Pit Logs, Plates A2 through A18, for a more detailed description of the conditions encountered at each location explored. A description of the field exploration methods is included in Appendix A. The following is a generalized description of the subsurface conditions encountered. The subsurface conditions encountered in our borings and test pits consist of four to ten feet of loose silt and sandy silt (Unified Classification ML) underlain by loose to medium dense silty sand (SM) and poorly-graded sand with silt (SP-SM). Dense to very dense poorly graded sand with silt and gravel (SP-SM) to poorly graded gravel with sand and silt (GP-GM) was encountered at approximately twenty feet below the existing ground surface and extended the full depth of our explorations. Groundwater Groundwater was encountered during drilling at six to twelve (12) feet below the ground surface. Groundwater seepage was encountered in our test pits from four and one half to eight feet below grade. The groundwater level is not static, therefore one may expect fluctuations in the level depending on the season, amount of rainfall, surface water runoff, and other factors. Generally, the water level is higher and seepage rate is greater in the wetter winter months (typically October through May). Laboratory Testing Laboratory tests were conducted on several representative soil samples to verify or modify the field soil classification and to evaluate the general physical properties and engineering characteristics of the soil encountered. Visual field classifications were supplemented by grain size analyses on representative soil samples. Moisture content tests were performed on all samples. The results of laboratory tests performed on specific samples are provided either at the appropriate sample depth on the individual boring logs or on a separate data sheet contained in Appendix B. It is important to note that these test results may not accurately represent the overall in-situ soil conditions. Our geotechnical recommendations are based on our interpretation of these test results and their use in guiding our engineering judgement. ECI cannot be responsible for the interpretation of these data by others. In accordance with our Standard Fee Schedule and General Conditions, the soil samples for this project will be discarded after a period of fifteen days following completion of this report unless we are otherwise directed in writing. Earth Consultants, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. E-8648 March 16, 1999 Page 3 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS General Based on the results of our study, it is our opinion that the proposed development can be constructed generally as planned provided the recommendations contained in this report are incorporated into the final design. The critical geotechnical aspects of the planned development are primarily associated with foundation support of the building footings and slabs-on-grade. In our opinion, the proposed structure should be supported on pile foundations obtaining support in the dense to very dense sand and gravel that underlies the I site at about twenty feet beneath the existing grades. Recommendations for pile installation and load capacities are presented in the Foundations section of this report. I The pile design has taken into consideration the downdrag forces caused by placing fill in the building area. Placing the fill early and allowing most of the settlement to be realized can reduce these downdrag forces. The fill will have to be in place at least one month to have any effect. Allowance should be made in initial grading to allow for settlement of the fill to be realized. We recommend overbuilding the pad by about six inches to account for the settlement that will result from the weight of the fill. The fill settlement should be monitored by placing several hubs on the fill surface and measuring the settlement. This report has been prepared for specific application to this project only and in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by other members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions in this area for the exclusive use of Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. and their representatives. No warranty, expressed or implied, is made. This report, in its entirety, should be included in the project contract documents for the information of the contractor. Site Preparation and General Earthwork Based on proposed site grades, the building pad will be filled four to six feet. This fill should be placed as early in the construction schedule as possible to allow the fill to settle prior to installing the piles. The fill will also provide a stable working surface for pile installation. The building and pavement areas should be stripped and cleared of trees, organic matter and other deleterious material. Existing utility pipes to be abandoned should be plugged or removed so that they do not provide a conduit for water and cause soil saturation and stability problems. Based on the thickness of the topsoil layer, encountered at our test pit locations, we estimate a stripping depth of less than two inches. Many areas on the site will not require stripping after removal of the trees. Stripped materials should not be mixed with materials to be used as structural fill. Earth Consultants, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. E-8648 March 16, 1999 Page 4 Following the stripping, the ground surface where structural fill, foundations, or slabs are to be placed should be observed by a representative of ECI. Proofrolling may be necessary in order to identify soft or unstable areas. Proofrolling should be performed under the observation of a representative of ECI. Soil in loose or soft areas, if recompacted and still yielding, should be overexcavated and replaced with structural fill to a depth that will provide a stable base beneath the general structural fill. The optional use of a geotextile fabric placed directly on the overexcavated surface may help to bridge unstable areas. Structural fill is defined as compacted fill placed under buildings, roadways, slabs, pavements, or other load-bearing areas. Structural fill under floor slabs and footings should be placed in horizontal lifts not exceeding twelve (12) inches in loose thickness and compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of its laboratory maximum dry density determined in accordance with ASTM Test Designation D-1557-78 (Modified Proctor). The fill materials should be placed at or near the optimum moisture content. Fill under pavements and walks should also be placed in horizontal lifts and compacted to 90 percent of maximum density except for the top twelve (12) inches which should be compacted to 95 percent of maximum density. The soils encountered during the site exploration are moisture sensitive due to their high fines content. As such, in an exposed condition they may become disturbed from normal construction activity especially when in a wet or saturated condition. Once disturbed, in a wet condition, they will be unsuitable for support of foundations or pavements. Therefore, during construction where these soils are exposed and will support new structures, care must be exercised not to disturb their condition. If disturbed conditions develop, the affected soils must be removed and replaced with structural fill. The depth of removal will be dependent on the level of disturbance developed during construction. Structural fill which is to be placed in wet weather should consist of a granular material with a maximum size of three inches and no more than five percent fines passing the No. 200 sieve, based on the minus 3/4-inch fraction. During dry weather, most compactible non- organic soil can be used as structural fill. It is recommended that structural fill planned for on site use be submitted for approval prior to import. Foundations In our opinion, the proposed hotel should be supported on driven piles obtaining their support by end bearing in the dense to very dense sand and gravel or on augercast piles embedded into the dense to very dense sand and gravel. We estimate pile lengths of approximately twenty (20) to thirty (30) feet will be required to obtain adequate embedment in the sand and gravel deposit. Due to the placement of about four to six feet of fill for the building pad, downdrag forces of ten tons have been taken into account for the allowable pile capacity. Earth Consultants, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. E-8648 March 16, 1999 Page 5 Timber Piles For the driven timber piles, in order to obtain a better estimate of the required pile lengths and driving characteristics, a series of test piles should be driven prior to ordering the production piles. The piles and hammer used should be the same as the type to be used for the installation of the production piles. A representative from our office should observe installation of both the test piles and production piles. Driven timber piles should consist of treated Class B timber piles. The piles should be driven into the dense to very dense layer of sand and gravel. The piles should conform to the specifications outlined in the Uniform Building Code Standard 25-12 for friction and end bearing piles. Timber piles should have a minimum tip diameter of seven inches and a maximum taper of one inch in ten feet. For piles driven to refusal, a maximum axial design capacity of twenty-five (25) tons may be used. The timber piles will derive support by end bearing in the sand and gravel. An uplift capacity of four (4) tons may be used for a single pile penetrating into the sand and gravel. No reduction in pile capacity is necessary if the piles are installed with a minimum center to center spacing of three pile diameters. The timber piles should be driven to refusal with a hammer having a rated energy of fifteen thousand (15,000) foot pounds. Refusal is defined as thirty-five (35) blows per foot for a twenty-five (25) ton pile. This pile capacity has been reduced to allow for downdrag forces caused by the placement of structural fill in the area of the building. The piles should be marked in one-foot increments, with lengths painted on every five feet to facilitate the recording of blow counts during driving. The tips and butts of all piles should be banded with two bands at each location to reduce the potential of pile damage during driving. Augercast Piles For 18-inch diameter augercast piles embedded at least 10 feet in the bearing layer, an allowable axial capacity of fifty (50) tons may be used. The allowable capacity includes the reduction for downdrag forces. The allowable pile capacity can be increased be additional penetration into the bearing stratum or by increasing the pile diameter. For resistance to uplift, an allowable capacity of twenty (20) tons can be used. No reduction in pile capacity is necessary if the piles are installed with a minimum center to center spacing of three pile diameters. As it is not possible to observe the completed pile below the ground surface, judgement and experience must be used as a basis for determining the acceptability of the pile. Therefore, a representative of ECI should observe the pile installation on a full time basis. This will allow us to fully evaluate the contractor's operation, collect and interpret the installation data and to verify bearing stratum elevations. Furthermore, we will be able to assess the implications of variations from normal procedures with respect to the design criteria. Earth Consultants, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. E-8648 March 16, 1999 Page 6 Settlement and Horizontal Loads Total settlement of single piles is estimated to be on the order of one-half inch. Most of this settlement should occur during the construction phase of the project as the dead loads are applied. The remaining settlements would develop after construction as the live loads are applied. Horizontal loads can be resisted by the pilings, friction between the base of the pile caps and grade beams and the supporting soil, and by passive soil pressure acting on the face of the buried portion of the pile caps and grade beams. A lateral pile capacity of 2 kips may be used for both pile types. This lateral load capacity assumes a deflection of one-quarter inch at the pile cap, and may be increased by one-third for short-term wind and seismic loading. For frictional capacity, a coefficient of 0.40 can be used. For passive earth pressure, the available resistance can be computed using an equivalent fluid pressure of three hundred (300) pcf provided the pile caps and grade beams are poured "neat" against the competent fill soils or backfilled with structural fill. These lateral resistance values are allowable values, a factor-of- safety of 1 .5 has been included. As movement of the foundation element is required to mobilize full passive resistance, the passive resistance should be neglected if such movement is not acceptable. Slab-on-Grade Floors We anticipate the floor slabs will be supported by the pile foundation system. The slabs could be supported directly on the structural fill placed in the building pad. However, we anticipate approximately one inch of differential settlement could occur between the slab and the pile supported portion of the structure after construction. Concrete slabs resting on soil ultimately cause the moisture content of the underlying soils to rise. This results from continued capillary rise and the ending of normal evapotranspiration. As concrete is permeable, moisture will eventually penetrate the slab resulting in a condition commonly known as a "wet slab" and poor adhesion of floor coverings. Therefore, the slab should be provided with a minimum of four inches of free-draining sand or gravel. In areas where slab moisture is undesirable, a vapor barrier such as a 6-mil plastic membrane may be placed beneath the slab. Two inches of damp sand may be placed over the membrane for protection during construction and to aid in curing of the concrete. Seismic Design Considerations The Puget Lowland is classified as Seismic Zone 3 by the Uniform Building Code (UBC). The largest earthquakes in the Puget Lowland are widespread and have been subcrustal events, ranging in depth from thirty (30) to fifty-five (55) miles. Such deep events have exhibited no surface faulting. Earth Consultants, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. E-8648 March 16, 1999 Page 7 Structures are subject to damage from earthquakes due to direct and indirect action. Direct action is represented by shaking. Indirect action is represented by foundation soil failures and is typified by ground failure or liquefaction. Liquefaction is a phenomenon in which soils lose all shear strength for short periods of time during an earthquake. Groundshaking of sufficient duration results in the loss of grain to grain contact and rapid increase in pore water pressure, causing the soil to behave as a fluid. To have a potential for liquefaction, a soil must be cohesionless with a grain size distribution of a specified range (generally sands and silt); it must be loose to medium dense; it must be below the groundwater table; and it must be subject to sufficient magnitude and duration of groundshaking. The effects of liquefaction may be large total and/or differential settlement for structures founded in the liquefying soils. It is our opinion the potential for liquefaction over the site during a seismic event is moderate to low. The effect of liquefaction on the planned development is anticipated to be minimal as the structure will be supported on a pile foundation system. In accordance with Table 16-J of the 1997 UBC, soil type SE, Soft Soil Profile, should be used in design. Excavations and Slopes The following information is provided solely as a service to our client. Under no circumstances should this information be interpreted to mean that ECI is assuming responsibility for construction site safety or the contractor's activities; such responsibility is not being implied and should not be inferred. In no case should excavation slopes be greater than the limits specified in local, state and Federal safety regulations. Based on the information obtained from our field exploration and laboratory testing, the site soils expected to be encountered in excavations would be classified as Type C by OSHA, and as such, temporary cuts greater than four feet in height should be sloped at an inclination no steeper than 1 .5H:1V. If slopes of this inclination, or flatter, cannot be constructed, temporary shoring may be necessary. This shoring will help protect against slope or excavation collapse, and will provide protection to workmen in the excavation. If temporary shoring is required, we will be available to provide shoring design criteria, if requested. Although no permanent slopes are anticipated, permanent cut and fill slopes should be inclined no steeper than 2H:1 V. Cut slopes should be observed by ECI during excavation to verify that conditions are as anticipated. Supplementary recommendations can then be developed, if needed, to improve stability, including flattening of slopes or installation of surface or subsurface drains. In any case, water should not be allowed to flow uncontrolled over the top of any slopes. Earth Consultants, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. E-8648 March 16, 1999 Page 8 All permanently exposed slopes should be seeded with an appropriate species of vegetation to reduce erosion and improve stability of the surficial layer of soil. Site Drainage The site must be graded such that surface water is directed off the site. Water must not be allowed to stand in areas where buildings, slabs or pavements are to be constructed. During construction, loose surfaces should be sealed at night by compacting the surface to reduce the potential for moisture infiltration into the soils. Final site grades must allow for drainage away from the building foundations. The ground should be sloped at a gradient of 3 percent for a distance of at least ten feet away from the buildings, except in paved areas, which can be sloped at a gradient of 2 percent. Utility Support and Backfill Based on the soil conditions encountered, the site soils should generally provide adequate support for utilities. However, the loose condition of some of the soils and the potential for a relatively high groundwater table may result in de-stabilizing of the trench bottom as the trench is excavated. Where loose soils or heavy groundwater seepage is encountered, remedial measures such as overexcavating soft soils or tamping quarry spalls into the trench bottom may be required. Caving of trench walls should be anticipated where the trenches encounter groundwater. Dewatering may also be necessary. Utility trench backfill is a primary concern in reducing the potential for settlement along utility alignments, particularly in pavement areas. It is important that each section of utility line be adequately supported in the bedding material. The material should be hand tamped to ensure support is provided around the pipe haunches. Fill should be carefully placed and hand tamped to about twelve inches above the crown of the pipe before any heavy compaction equipment is brought into use. The remainder of the trench backfill should be placed in lifts having a loose thickness of less than twelve inches. A typical trench backfill section and compaction requirements for load supporting and non-load supporting areas is presented on Plate 3. Pavement Areas The adequacy of site pavements is related in part to the condition of the underlying subgrade. The subgrade should be treated and prepared as described in the Site Preparation and General Earthwork section of this report. This means at least the top twelve (12) inches of the subgrade should be compacted to 95 percent of the maximum dry density (per ASTM D-1557-78). It is possible that some localized areas of soft, wet or unstable subgrade may still exist after this process. Therefore, a greater thickness of structural fill or crushed rock may be needed to stabilize these localized areas. Earth Consultants, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. E-8648 March 16, 1999 Page 9 The following pavement section for lightly-loaded areas can be used: • Two inches of asphalt concrete (AC) over four inches of crushed rock base (CRB) material, or • Two inches of AC over three inches of asphalt treated base (ATB) material. Heavier truck-traffic areas will require thicker sections depending upon site usage, pavement life and site traffic. As a general rule, the following sections can be considered for heavy traffic areas: • Three inches of AC over six inches of CRB, or • Three inches of AC over four and one-half inches of ATB. Pavement section options utilizing cement-treated subgrade can be provided upon request. Asphalt concrete (AC), asphalt treated base (ATB), and crushed rock base (CRB) materials should conform to WSDOT specifications. All rock base should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the ASTM D-1557-78 laboratory test standard. LIMITATIONS Our recommendations and conclusions are based on the site materials observed, selective laboratory testing and engineering analyses, the design information provided to us by the you, and our experience and engineering judgement. The conclusions and recommendations are professional opinions derived in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by other members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions in this area. No warranty is expressed or implied. The recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the borings. Soil and groundwater conditions between borings may vary from those encountered. The nature and extent of variations between our exploratory locations may not become evident until construction. If variations do appear, ECI should be requested to reevaluate the recommendations of this report and to modify or verify them in writing prior to proceeding with the construction. Earth Consultants, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. E-8648 March 16, 1999 Page 10 Additional Services As the engineer of record, ECI should be retained to perform a general review of the final design and specifications to verify that the earthwork and foundation recommendations have been properly interpreted and implemented in the design and in the construction specifications. ECI should also be retained to provide geotechnical services during construction. This is to observe compliance with the design concepts, specifications or recommendations and to facilitate design changes in the event subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated prior to the start of construction. We do not accept responsibility for the performance of the foundation or earthwork unless we are retained to review the construction drawings and specifications, and to provide construction observation and testing services. Earth Consultants, Inc. T 1# S \''' .! ° 7, �S 4:LTNI 3" xoc �r '.i1 W �y� 11 21 ` I1� d34tNg`1 I -t;°14 - "`1 ST RENTON x YI tV r -41 -T--S7 a, A"I' V_I 4 v .1 t Nc 5 ( �I ,nl z` Lyarkl)'�T• i .\,.\ gt J 3RD • `6 - '.. 900 S k- 1�. vIV/./ 3� �5 1u a `i..A STaj '/F. ' '. W ' $UP1 x' S4 irn rT .f.d two tix. v��k i . i w .tr w 14, 1 w ;n ttrypt v r ?iv (44,:el1.4 t+ 141 4 1 r�1. '�i ,,a. i „ Ic 4 .L Sc'H 5E 167 5 T 4 <_ \ ti ^ f SM 7THA .: STK 1 5 H \ E {oT- I ( N' s not j e` i to i1 CT N7LLl� 1111k CENTER I SYI ��-��^""4.--�' � of � ■ 5 s 1' lLAiiE Ft '� ,, -: a-fi+ + 4 R } �:,�ddar 0 'it'Iti '-,'i ' t `•1 .., 1' 20 f a r . r 5 +3 . OTN !q t • Sii 6TN ha ST f` 1 y SITE mil s P �R u s a sr .w ' b i' S w �' f sE P. biN ty '1 1r, ., i t ^-^� 2. I:- t - ... "^c . 0 i • ; i 1 c s r- 4 1.1 "'is MTN ~�! ors y St tlM I .q `t SM_MH ST Q19 W , y „..,s L K �` i i ` S 19TN a SF �• aF E- ...tr Pk ,,, 7'' ct1"�',6 'it-11�' 1 iafil „ 'g A '?ltt Sr ,� 1 gh.Aws iir,f 4 " Woo I * T 1 _ 4Y 93R0,sT S 23PoD I sT , •°'v t�""° IV.tip`' p A. i NIO $ 1ai62hD L: tyJ S r 4f Tr !{ � " S7 1+s" t* ' '' ' 5 27TH ST n 5E • TH ST • ` ti w lation 1 REH1f IdR TI,ANTTS 6 2? L�/ t. 4,` �F'E 16Eiu �!' n 1 SN 29T y S1 .K4-,40 ,r ,/L L. t,5 •'t. 'i-Ai inn.,1 j i,st 30Th {''b' .JY[sf er; }i ._._ ^'J SE_ °vtY r 5 JlsT ST c 29w ST 11 �h 4 u 3 3b0 • i 75t 1691N I.h I sr 167 a si„bit s dS�r.� IJm sw rdi __ST AUJf�FR �� �� �� d �.,...-.-..._..�..__. �I sale SE S bt ; `sE. r-, IIO sT :: t :fLtM''7kY 0 K7 N' < 19R'V".//•�t Q4�J Sf a ! I x. R 1" l .. t 'j i s _ - ..A'' •c•4 Reference: ./P: • v' 411\ King County/Map 656 rajii `,o� t4 Earth Consultants, Inc. By Thomas Brothers Maps r ` Geotechnical Engineers,Geologisis&En ironmental Scientists Dated 1 C.i99 Vicinity Map Candlewood Hotel Renton, Washington NOTE: This plate contains areas of color. ECI cannot be responsible for any subsequent Drwn. GLS Date Mar. '99 Proj. No. 8648 misinterpretation of the information resulting from black & white reproductions of this plate. Checked KME Date 3/18/99 Plate 1 THOMAS AVENUE S.W. (VACATED) Trash —� Encksure 1TP-1 L 1 B-2 —.— B-1 I —,- p , L -:- 0 B-3I 0 1 , W U) 0 O0 TP-am O � 0_ w I I I l 0_ 0 Z I— U —i— W TP-61 W CC 1 TP-2 _I.- 1 B-4 "I (0 I I TP-7 ?, C) i, 1 TP-3 11 1 I I .. . TP-5 I —�Standing Water . I ,, • I -0 Ii c i I 'o II Proposed TP-4I I i tea, 0- I I m a i I m ii I Detention Pond I w e i I N c 1 . rn c I I I a o II o o I I a o I I I 2c II 2 C I I 2 c N I I a, I I a w I d � II 0_ G) I ! I CIII 0 I I C II , I LEGEND PACIFIC AVE. S.W. (VACATED) Approximate Scale moms room B-1—•— Approximate Location of 0 30 60 120ft. ECI Boring, Proj. No. E-8648, Mar. 1999 ��\: �) 0111)4;(10-01K1Earth Coultan , c. Geotechnlcal Engineers,Geologists&Em ironnttsental SclInenttst s TP-1—!— Approximate Location of ECI Test Pit, Proj. No. E-8648, Mar. 1999 Boring and Test Pit Location Plan Candlewood Hotel Proposed Building Renton, Washington NOTE: This plate contains area of color. ECI cannot be responsible for any subsequent Drwn. GLS Date Mar. '99 Proj. No. 8648 misinterpretation of the information resulting from black& white reproductions of this plate. Checked KME Date 3/18/99 Plate 2 Non-Load Supporting Floor Slab or Areas Roadway Areas II - I. . 1 A _ • r dd 'Y fir" �' U0G o o - o 0 0 Varies ° o • o �o 00 0 95 0 85 95 I 1 Foot Minimum Backfill : 80 90 Varies oo o(1° ; PIPE •o. 0 0.0. � A nn • O •0 Q` �b o o°• a. Bedding ':�°Q'.• 06.o o0do9:0�.0 Varies •o.•.6. Q••oo.o .o:: 69DO.o.• o •. O 'o•�O!:o.9 ,,o•o8. °O.0 o..QQ0••opoOoC p0 04•.p:•• o 0o poo o•. .000• aso.:p'o o V n•O�o° o•oBQon•OriooO .Ood.•;o-�•o•o ° LEGEND: cur.,; rrW Asphalt or Concrete Pavement or Concrete Floor Slab twoittm 0 0.o a00., . a ,. o • ., , . o. Backfill; Compacted On-Site Soil or Imported Select Fill Material as Described in the Site Preparation of the General Earthwork Section of the Attached Report Text. 95 Minimum Percentage of Maximum Laboratory Dry Density as Determined by ASTM Test Method D 1557-78 (Modified Proctor), Unless Otherwise Specified in the Attached Report Text. .,:•••_.o°y°�� Bedding Material; Material Type Depends on Type of Pipe and lo.aQ p, Laying Conditions. Bedding Should Conform to the Manufacturers Recommendations for the Type of Pipe Selected. //*; 'O. 411 TYPICAL UTILITY TRENCH FILL I idl'� Earth Consultants Inc. Candlewood Hotel Geaechnical F_np,Ineers.Geologists&Fftvimnmental Scientists Renton, Washington Proj. No. 8648 I Drwn. GLS I Date Mar. '99 Checked KME bate 3/18/99 I Plate 3 APPENDIX A FIELD EXPLORATION E-8648 Our field exploration was performed on March 1 and 2, 1999. Subsurface conditions at the site were explored by drilling four borings to a maximum depth of thirty-nine (39) feet below the existing grade and excavating eight test pits to a maximum depth of twelve (12) feet below grade. The borings were drilled by Associated Drilling, Inc., subcontracted to ECI, using a truck mounted drill rig. The test pits were excavated by Five Ball Construction, subcontracted to ECI, using a track mounted excavator. Approximate boring and test pit locations were determined by pacing from site boundaries. The boring and test pit locations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. These approximate locations are shown on the Boring and Test Pit Location Plan, Plate 2. The field exploration was continuously monitored by an engineer from our firm who classified the soils encountered, maintained a log of each boring, obtained representative samples, measured groundwater levels, and observed pertinent site features. All samples were visually classified in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System, which is presented on Plate Al , Legend. Logs of the borings are presented on Plates A2 through A9. In each boring, Standard Penetration Tests (SPT) were performed at selected intervals in general accordance with ASTM Test Designation D-1586. The split spoon samples were driven with a one hundred forty (140) pound hammer freely falling thirty (30) inches. The number of blows required to drive the last twelve (12) inches of penetration are called the "N-value". This value helps to characterize the site soils and is used in our engineering analyses. Test Pit Logs are presented on Plates Al 0 through A19. The consistency of the soil shown on the logs was estimated based on the effort required to excavate the soil, the stability of the trench walls, and other factors. Representative soil samples were placed in closed containers and returned to our laboratory for further examination and testing. The final logs represent our interpretations of the field logs and the results of the laboratory examination and tests of field samples. The strati- fication lines on the logs represent the approximate boundaries between soil types. In actuality, the transitions may be more gradual. Earth Consultants, Inc. MAJOR DIVISIONS GRAPH LETTER SYMBOL SYMBOL TYPICAL DESCRIPTION Gravel Q ° b b ( GW Well-Graded Gravels, Gravel-Sand Q °a ° gw Mixtures, Little Or No Fines And Clean Gravels n n n Gravelly (little or no fines) M M i Gp Poorly-Graded Gravels,Gravel- Coarse Soils II ` II ' I; gp Sand Mixtures, Little Or No Fines Grained Soils More Than 1 I GM Silty Gravels,Gravel-Sand- 50% Coarse Gravels With gm Silt Mixtures Fraction Fines(appreciable Retained On amount of fines) GC Clayey Gravels,Gravel-Sand- No. 4 SieveIlli gc Clay Mixtures . . °o SW Well-Graded Sands, Gravelly SanAnd Clean Sand o o o o d ' a 0SW Sands, Little Or No Fines Sandy (little or no fines) a;:::q"i,i ;:q:::: More Than ::' o„:.,: * SP Poorly-Graded Sands, Gravelly y::w.;:;*°]:!is Soils i;, Sands, Little Or No Fines 50% Material # •�" �'"` Sp Larger Than More Than No.200 Sieve - SM Silty Sands Sand- Silt Mixtures Size 50% Coarse Sands With i Sm Fraction Fines(appreciable r Passing No.4 amount of fines) F` > :` '' ' SC Sieve ' ;;' > SC Clayey Sands, Sand-Clay Mixtures III ML Inorganic Silts&Very Fine Sands,Rock Flour,Silty- ml Clayey Fine Sands;Clayey Silts w/Slight Plasticity Fine Silts JJJJ /� Inorganic Clays Of Low To Medium Plasticity, Grained And Liquid Limit //, CL S Less Than 50 Soils Clays CI Gravelly Clays, Sandy Clays, Silty Clays, Lean 1 III I I I II OL Organic Silts And Organic I I Oi Silty Clays Of Low Plasticity I MH mll InorganicSandOr SiltsSilty, MicaceousSoils Or Diatomaceous Fire More Than 50% Material Silts Liquid Limit Smaller Than And CH Inorganic Clays Of High No.200 Sieve Clays Greater Than 50 Ch Plasticity, Fat Clays Size id "Lj �AOf•I Organic Clays Of Medium To High /� Oh Plasticity, Organic Silts �i� ��L `- PT Peat, Humus, Swamp Soils Highly Organic Soils i `‘r `tr \ r pt With High Organic Contents Topsoil 'y 4'y 4' Humus And Duff Layer ���*���It*at Hiyhl Variable Constituents Fill ♦�•��1,�� � y I The discussion in the text of this report is necessary for a proper understanding of the nature of the material presented in the attached logs. DUAL SYMBOLS are used to Indicate borderline soil classification. C TORVANE READING,tsf I 2"O.D. SPLIT SPOON SAMPLER qu PENETROMETER READING,tsf W MOISTURE, %dry weight I{ 24" I.D. RING OR SHELBY TUBE SAMPLER P SAMPLER PUSHED * SAMPLE NOT RECOVERED i WATER OBSERVATION WELL pcf DRY DENSITY,lbs. per cubic ft. LL LIQUID LIMIT,% 2 DEPTH OF ENCOUNTERED GROUNDWATER PI PLASTIC INDEX DURING EXCAVATION Y SUBSEQUENT GROUNDWATER LEVEL W/DATE �1� 4t,� Earth Consultants Inc. LEGEND Lw�� (ilik:e.,;( ' W , III III Ill allI:i gpill.(TS.OoDiogisis&Li 1V1(01111k'111.11 SL'k:111LSIS IWWN Proj. No. 8648 IDateMarch '99 Al(Plate Boring Log Project Name: Sheet of Candlewood Hotel 1 2 Job No. Logged by: Start Date: Completion Date: Boring No.: 8648 KME 3/1/99 3/1/99 B-1 Drilling Contactor: Drilling Method: Sampling Method: Holocene HSA SPT Ground Surface Elevation: Hole Completion: ❑ Monitoring Well ❑ Piezometer ® Abandoned,sealed with bentonite W No. t o t a n Surface Conditions: General a a ,(1) Notes (%) Blows m E o ,L E j E, Ft. 6 rn rn rn ML Brown SILT,very loose,wet 1 2 ML Reddish brown and gray sandy SILT,very loose,wet 40.8 3 • 3 4 5 6 -grades to gray 7 SM Gray silty SAND, very loose,wet 35.4 8 3 9 10 11 12 33.7 131 -becomes loose 7 14 15 16 17 44.2 rn 18 9 C 19 U w 4, ��', ,,41. Boring Log e� a Earth Consultants Inc. Candlewood Hotel 8 Pp10 GcoredCnk:alFnginectmGchk lsts&FnvlrtmmenralSclentlsn Renton,Washington o Proj.No. 8648 Dwn. GLS Date Mar. '99 Checked KME Date 3/12/99 I Plate A2 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of information presented on this log. Boring Log Project Name: Sheet of Candlewood Hotel 2 2 Job No. Logged by: Start Date: Completion Date: Boring No.: 8648 KME 3/1/99 3/1/99 B-1 Drilling Contactor Drilling Method: Sampling Method: Holocene HSA SPT Ground Surface Elevation: Hole Completion: ❑ Monitoring Well ❑ Piezometer ® Abandoned,sealed with bentonite General W No. g o L CL w o Notes % Blows m E „ `L E `n E ) Ft. 6 o u> SM -grades with gravel SP-SM Gray poorly graded SAND with silt and gravel,very dense, } a 21 waterbearing n o a a 22 10.2 0a 23 50 )' 0 o a 24 �•d o, So 25 o a 26 -5%fines ; a•,° a 27 - 0 ' a 28 0 29 ~0 0 ', a 30 a a 31 a a ' a : 32 • a 8.6 >_, 60 • 0 33 -increasing silt content or o' y 34 i • a 35 0 °.0 36 a 4 0 • 0 37 e a 16.6 4 0 3s Boring terminated at 39.0 feet below existing grade. Groundwater a 59 table encountered at 12.0 feet during drilling. 0 0 39 a. w a. II/is- gir, 44►v Boring Log difoliji Earth Consultants Inc. Candlewood Hotel liff NoiGlf G dn,lc-alFngne:,>.Geologists&FnvIr0n?11 nral Sclt-nristsRenton, Washington 0 Proj.No. 8648 Dwn. GLS Date Mar. '99 Checked KME Date 3/12/99 Plate A3 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of information presented on this log. Boring Log Project Name: Sheet of Candlewood Hotel 1 2 Job No. Logged by: Start Date: Completion Date: Boring No.: 8648 KME 3/1/99 3/1/99 B-2 Drilling Contactor: Drilling Method: Sampling Method: Holocene HSA SPT Ground Surface Elevation: Hole Completion: ❑ Monitoring Well ❑ Piezometer ® Abandoned,sealed with bentonite No. o a L a N Surface Conditions: General W Blows c E U Notes (16) Ft. 5 N o ti in 0 cn ML Brown SILT, very loose,wet 1 2 44.4 3 4 4 5 6 7 37.0 8 -grades to reddish brown and gray sandy silt 3 9 10 V SM Gray silty SAND, medium dense,waterbearing 11 12 31.4 13 22 14 15 16 17 15.3 a 20 18 — 0 19 c0 U w .a►; E». 444 Boring Log ' � Earth ConsultantsInc. Candlewood Hotel tr 1i , GcxxrcYtnk'al Fn lnreas, sts h Fnvtmnn crnral Scientlu� o *'�' Renton, Washington 0 o Proj.No. 8648 Dwn. GLS Date Mar. '99 Checked KME Date 3/12/99 I Plate A4 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of information presented on this log. Boring Log Project Name: Sheet of Candlewood Hotel 2 2 Job No. Logged by: Start Date: Completion Date: Boring No.: 8648 KME 3/1/99 3/1/99 B-2 Drilling Contactor: Drilling Method: Sampling Method: Holocene HSA SPT Ground Surface Elevation: Hole Completion: ❑ Monitoring Well ❑ Piezometer ® Abandoned,sealed with bentonite General W No. 2o r "' I Notes % Blows fitE v u E ) Ft. C c n o u> • SP-SM Gray poorly graded SAND with silt and gravel, very dense, o waterbearing 21 22 olL° 17.5 50/6" y 23 O p o o Q • ° 24 — ° • 25 O o 26 • ° p°c 27 11.4 si °' 28 — 57 po °o O 29 P o 0 • 0 30 — 0 GP-GM Grades to poorly graded GRAVEL with silt and sand,very dense, 31 waterbearing •. •. •1•1 32 IS I 12.5 50/6' •• •■ • • 33• '• • I IS I •• •. 34 •'•+ II III 135 �• Vi; I IS I 36 •I•+ 37 I IS I • •. 17.5 50/6" �!III 38 ,75 Boring terminated at 38.5 feet below existing grade. Groundwater a table encountered at 10.0 feet during drilling. U W dos .$h. 441% Boring Log A Earth Consultants Inc. Candlewood Hotel 'j(`' `� Gc:ofrchnk:al En G s, ,oil ogsn&Fnvlmnnirnral Sctrnfisis o Renton,Washington Proj.No. 8648 Dwn. GLS Date Mar. '99 Checked KME Date 3/12/99 Plate A5 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of information presented on this log. Boring Log Project Name: Sheet of Candlewood Hotel 1 2 Job No. Logged by: Start Date: Completion Date: Boring No.: 8648 KME 3/2/99 3/2/99 B-3 Drilling Contactor: Drilling Method: Sampling Method: Holocene HSA SPT Ground Surface Elevation: Hole Completion: ❑ Monitoring Well ❑ Piezometer ® Abandoned,sealed with bentonite W No t o t a - Surface Conditions: General a a BIFws 5o E o m T Notes (%) 5 t� a ML Brown SILT, very loose,wet 1 2 ML Brown and gray sandy SILT, very loose,wet 37.2 3 3 4 SM Gray silty SAND, very loose,wet 5 6 a 7 36.5 8 2 9 10 11 12 40.5 13 11 14 -grades with gravel 15 16 ,!�� 17 GP-GM Gray poorly graded GRAVEL with silt and sand, medium dense, 6,--"11 waterbearing 11.9 !1!! 18 19 II r II •. • ,m, 4/11. • Boring Log `--�. aI Earth Consultants Inc. Candlewood Hotel / Gtorect Fnglnects. vA FnWrro drntsts\� ���� n�dl G-nbgi k uttrnral Sl o Renton,Washington 0 Proj. No. 8648 Dwn. GLS Date Mar. '99 Checked KME Date 3/12/99 Plate A6 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of information presented on this log. Boring Log Project Name: Sheet of Candlewood Hotel 2 2 Job No. Logged by: Start Date: Completion Date: Boring No.: 8648 KME 3/2/99 3/2/99 B-3 Drilling Contactor: Drilling Method: Sampling Method: Holocene ; HSA SPT Ground Surface Elevation: Hole Completion: ❑ Monitoring Well ❑ Piezometer ® Abandoned,sealed with bentonite No. General W t t a r, Notes �%) Blows ,- — i ? a Ft. 6 � C) • 1.I GP-GM Gray poorly graded GRAVEL with silt and sand, very dense, 1i waterbearing •. • 21 . •1.1 1IIIV 22 — 13.7 . 1 . 1 50/3" 23 �I • I 24 I • I 25 — 117 1 26 GP Grades to poorly graded GRAVEL with sand, very dense, • I waterbearing •. •. 27 8.9 •1•1 1 I. 28 57 •• •• -3%fines •I =129 41. I 30 I I . 1 31 I II ••• •• 32 1.1 10.7 I III I 73 ;';' 33 lb • I 84 •1.1 I is1 35 •1•I 36 I •11 37 III I 14.9 Boring terminated at 39.0 feet below existing grade. Groundwater 60 1 1 38 table encountered at 6.0 feet during drilling. II IS I 0 39 U w ibis, 0, 44k Boring Log m A/ Earth Consultants Inc. Candlewood Hotel 8 �il f)/\' v `�JIJ Gcorec hnleal Fnglne ms,G-dc>tivs&FnNronmmnral SelrntIstA Renton, Washington m Proj.No. 8648 Dwn. GLS Date Mar. '99 Checked KME Date 3/12/99 Plate A7 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of information presented on this log. Boring Log Project Name: Sheet of Candlewood Hotel 1 2 Job No. Logged by: Start Date: Completion Date: Boring No.: 8648 KME 3/2/99 3/2/99 B-4 Drilling Contactor: Drilling Method: Sampling Method: Holocene HSA SPT Ground Surface Elevation: Hole Completion: ❑ Monitoring Well ❑ Piezometer ® Abandoned,sealed with bentonite No. r o r a coSurface Conditions: General W Blows a• E U 13 Notes (%) E o i E ,E, Ft. � cn u:t U ML Brown SILT,very loose,wet 1 2 ML Reddish brown and gray sandy SILT, loose,wet 43.0 3 4 4 5 SM Grades to brown silty SAND, loose,wet 6 — 7 Q SP-SM Brown poorly graded SAND with silt, medium dense,waterbearing 28.9 • 0 11 ° ° 8 9 • 0 10 4. .a 11 -7%fines 0 o,Q • 12 26.5 20 • °. 13 • 0 - 0' 14 15 • 0 16 ° o ° ,„° 17 — 0 19.1 r°'o 18 19 �'o c 0 e ° 0 19 0 i •° U 0 W o 2 41'_ E!),, 441. Boring Log I -10 xxrEarthConsultants Inc. Candlewood Hotel O I' 1� Gcchnk-alEnR peril,Geolostsrs FnvImnnuenralStit-Mixs Renton, Washington Proj.No. 8648 Dwn. GLS Date Mar. '99 Checked KME Date 3/12/99 I Plate A8 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of information presented on this log. Boring Log Project Name: Sheet of Candlewood Hotel 2 2 Job No. Logged by: Start Date: Completion Date: Boring No.: 8648 KME 3/2/99 3/2/99 B-4 Drilling Contactor: Drilling Method: Sampling Method: Holocene HSA SPT Ground Surface Elevation: Hole Completion: ❑ Monitoring Well ❑ Piezometer ® Abandoned,sealed with bentonite General W No. L t . cn 0 a Notes r,� Blows 2- E• aE, E N E ) Ft. 6- to 0 g c'n • a SP-SM Gray poorly graded SAND with silt,dense,waterbearing a ° 21 ,'4 a ° a' 22 ',a 20.4 • a 23 33 r''' °,a ,, ° 24 a ,,, a o a' ' 25 },0 a ° 2s -grades with gravel 0 ' a 27 10.3 >w° 52 28 -grades to very dense ° 29 0 O ° a P..° 30 0 1' a • a 31 GP-GM Grades to poorly graded GRAVEL with silt and sand, very dense, waterbearing •. . 32 • 12.3 . 1 lb 133 — 61 •• �1 I II \ 34 •• • .1 1 35 b •• • •▪ 1 1 36 I •• •• 37 .1 11.2 `A' 50/6" •. • 38 a •. I Boring terminated at 38.5 feet below existing grade. Groundwater table encountered at 7.0 feet during drilling. U W IP_ Ear, 44k Boring Log 00 'ili 17 C,i • Earth Consultants Inc. Candlewood Hotel f'' `I \i GcortsYmk2 kot lFnglneeas.G-di Nm&FnntuenralScirntlsn Renton,Washington o Proj. No. 8648 Dwn. GLS Date Mar. '99 Checked KME Date 3/12/99 Plate A9 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of information presented on this log. Test Pit Log Project Name: Sheet of Candlewood Hotel 1 1 Job No. Logged by: Date: Test Pit No.: 8648 KME 3/1/99 TP-1 Excavation Contactor: Ground Surface Elevation: 5-Ball Notes: 0 7 L „ N o Surface Conditions: General W . a cL • E Notes (%) m a o " m Cl) >. 0rn rn cn ML Brown SILT with sand,very loose,wet • 1 2 38.8 3 4 -grades to brown and gray 5 53.6 6 ML/SM Gray sandy SILT, loose,wet 7 41.2 8 s -grades to silty sand -caved to 5' 10 Test pit terminated at 10.0 feet below existing grade. No groundwater encountered during excavation. a a 0 0 0 w Li 0 ,/n Oa�, .�A I% Test Pit Log n, Earth Consultants Inc. Candlewood Hotel p q114(J/ V �,1 Gc orrc3mlral Englneets,GtologLsts&Fi vimnn xonral Sclentt>'n Renton,Washington a iT Proj.No. 8648 I Dwn. GLS Date Mar. '99 Checked KME Date 3/12/99 Plate A10 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of information presented on this log. Test Pit Log Project Name: Sheet of Candlewood Hotel 1 1 Job No. Logged by: Date: Test Pit No.: 8648 KME 3/1/99 TP-2 Excavation Contactor: Ground Surface Elevation: 5-Ball Notes: General W " -6 t w co -6Surface Conditions: Notes 1O E e `L E co E ��'� 0 cn in cn ML Brown SILT, very loose,wet t 2 3 45.6 4 -grades to reddish brown and gray sandy silt 1 5 6 7 8 V SM Gray silty SAND loose,waterbearing, caved to surface 9 Test pit terminated at 9.0 feet below existing grade. Groundwater table encountered at 8.0 feet during excavation. 8,5 F- 0 0 U w a a,"- -Eal, AV Test Pit Log (2 �� y ni Earth Consultants Inc. Candlewood Hotel \(1Pi/(1el/`tirif GeorttYtnl-al Fnglnents.Geologists&Fnvlmnniental Scientism Renton,Washington a w Proj. No. 8648 Dwn. GLS Date Mar. '99 Checked KME Date 3/12/99 Plate All Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of information presented on this log. Test Pit Log Project Name: Sheet of Candlewood Hotel 1 1 Job No. Logged by: Date: Test Pit No.: 8648 KME 3/1/99 TP-3 Excavation Contactor: Ground Surface Elevation: 5-Ball Notes: ,7) L (1) .7, Surface Conditions: General W Notes (%) ito 5-: m o E ML Brown SILT, very loose,wet t 34.2 2 3 -grades to reddish brown and gray sandy silt 4 5 6 7 Q • 8 SP-SM Reddish brown poorly graded SAND with silt and gravel, medium 14.8 ,° s dense,waterbearing s �- 10 Test pit terminated at 10.0 feet below existing grade. Groundwater table encountered at 7.0 feet during excavation. a m r 0 U W 2 a". 01- 44k Test Pit Log ��f dy`l, Earth Consultants Inc. 'iP' \ivl Nap Candlewood Hotel p Gc:cxrcY�nk:al FnRlnes.GmM�t�:t� FnNmnnu�n�al Scientists Renton, Washington a al Proj.No. 8648 Dwn. GLS Date Mar. '99 Checked KME Date 3/12/99 Plate Al2 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of information presented on this log. Test Pit Log Project Name: Sheet of Candlewood Hotel 1 1 Job No. Logged by: Date: Test Pit No.: 8648 KME 3/1/99 TP-4 Excavation Contactor: Ground Surface Elevation: 5-Ball Notes: co General W o = a o Surface Conditions: Notes (%) `` >. o `l m D T cn ML Brown SILT, very loose,wet 1 2 3 -wood pieces 33.4 4 -grades to silty sand 5 6 V SP-SM Gray poorly graded SAND with silt and gravel, medium dense, o waterbearing 8 -caved to surface Test pit etrminated at 8.0 feet below existing grade. Groundwater table encountered at 6.0 feet during excavation. en O, a 0 0 0 w a dr E��. 44h. Test Pit Log na Earth Consultants Inc. Candlewood Hotel J001wi/Miff N��� Grcxectink:alFnglnextui,Geologists&FnNmnmrnralSientlsm Renton,Washington I- a. 1-- Proj.No. 8648 Dwn. GLS Date Mar. '99 Checked KME Date 3/12/99 Plate A13 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of information presented on this log. Test Pit Log Project Name: Sheet of Candlewood Hotel 1 1 Job No. Logged by: Date: Test Pit No.: 8648 KME 3/1/99 TP-5 Excavation Contactor: Ground Surface Elevation: 5-Ball Notes: .7) L o Surface Conditions: General W .ct Notes E Ca E N E ML Brown SILT, very loose,wet 1 2 50.0 3 -grades to sandy silt 4 5 SP Reddish brown poorly graded SAND, loose,waterbearing o a 0 7 21.7 -grades to gray Q ° - 8 Test pit terminated at 8.0 feet below existing grade. Groundwater table encountered at 4.5 feet during excavation. a 0 0 W ,u►_ ght 41 . Test Pit Log co „„oilb Earth Consultants Inc. Candlewood Hotel 'JP)/ wif NiFJ G-otechnlral Fngln[trys.Gw:obgtsn&FiiNmnnxenral Scientists Renton,Washington CI. Proj.No. 8648 Dwn. GLS Date Mar. '99 Checked KME Date 3/12/99 Plate A14 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of information presented on this log. Test Pit Log Project Name: Sheet of Candlewood Hotel 1 1 Job No. Logged by: Date: Test Pit No.: 8648 KME 3/1/99 TP-6 Excavation Contactor: Ground Surface Elevation: 5-Ball Notes: o t N o Surface Conditions: General W . 2 a Notes 0 E °' Jr. 1n E (%) c� 1n r7 in cn ML Brown SILT, very loose,wet 2 31.0 3 -grades to sandy silt 4 5 SM Interbedded brown sandy SILT and silty SAND, loose,wet 6 32.2 8 9 Test pit terminated at 9.0 feet below existing grade. No groundwater encountered during excavation. en F 0 U ,,,►_ $4, .i . Test Pit Log --- Earth Consultants Inc. Candlewood Hotel 6/ 10,Nit GcorectinIcal Englneets,Geo4ogIsis&EnvIronmenral Scientlsrs Renton, Washington WProj.No. 8648 Dwn. GLS Date Mar.'99 Checked KME Date 3/12/99 I Plate A15 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of information presented on this log. Test Pit Log Project Name: Sheet of Candlewood Hotel 1 1 Job No. Logged by: Date: Test Pit No.: 8648 KME 3/1/99 TP-7 Excavation Contactor: Ground Surface Elevation: 5-Ball Notes: V 7 a, o Surface Conditions: General W L N 11- Notes (%) m i o �` g D ,. C7 fn N (� ML Brown SILT with sand, very loose,wet 1 2 43.6 3 4 5 SP-SM Gray poorly graded SAND with silt and gravel, loose,waterbearing v • 'o"° 6 , v 7 33.6 ',:.° o o' 8 oc • v r o: 0 t 10 Test pit terminated at 10.0 feet below existing grade. Groundwater table encountered at 5.0 feet during excavation. to a t, ,- a a W o 04 ii" .04. 441%. Test Pit Log p �il �1 fila� Earth Consultants Inc. Candlewood Hotel 1p N u,`,rrr) Gt,on Ymlcal F.nglnetts.Geologt$ts&Fnvhonntenral Selmtlsts l- Renton, Washington EL wProj.No. 8648 Dwn. GLS Date Mar.'99 Checked KME Date 3/12/99 Plate A16 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of information presented on this log. Test Pit Log Project Name: Sheet of Candlewood Hotel 1 1 Job No. Logged by: Date: Test Pit No.: 8648 KME 3/1/99 TP-8 Excavation Contactor: Ground Surface Elevation: 5-Ball Notes: o a, Surface Conditions: General W t o • a rn n Notes (%) `` E, o m Cl) �. 00) CO CO ML Brown SILT, very loose,wet 2 35.9 3 4 -grades to reddish brown and gray 5 6 -grades with silty sand lenses 7 8 SM Gray silty SAND, loose to medium dense,wet 37.9 9 10 11 12 Test pit terminated at 12.0 feet below existing grade. No groundwater encountered during excavation. t] (7 U W 0, 411V Test Pit Log $ ie1� M`n..1ir Forth Consultants Inc. Candlewood Hotel Pi1 �V�/Nkiw Gtoced,nk-alFnglnrcis.Gtologtsis&Fnvlmnn lent-al Scientists Renton,Washington Proj.No. 8648 Dwn. GLS Date Mar. '99 Checked KME Date 3/12/99 Plate A17 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of information presented on this log. APPENDIX B LABORATORY TEST RESULTS E-8648 Earth Consukants, Inc. SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER ANALYSIS -o Ei SIZE OF OPENING IN INCHES I NUMBER OF MESH PER INCH, U.S.STANDARD GRAIN SIZE IN MM O CO t0 d' M N O t0 Cr M N O O 0 O O O N a d m N �o d O (O 0 O O 00 Op O0 p p O O O. p . !0 cf M N c-�-9 _ 00 N M �cD 00 N 0 90 • .1 10 co * . 1 • rrj --flt) IIIIII :: II 11111 80 aiuiiii11� ■ I IIUIII 1111.. 111111 •! 20 f •-* m IllIr' " m - 73 3070mC) Z Z u) ,1 so III 40 n --, v m O ]p 50 JO C T 50 CO m • n co m J -< ao ME� so W o' • n 2 41110111111111 ir 1 70 to r 30 m �y IIIIIIIIIIII u 6 I ? 20 \ 80 CD CD X i a 10 _____1__I_____I /li 4► ■` • 90 MII•I•IM IMMUNE M■MMIEMI=INIIIIMIIIIN Ell Illii 'Pl► OM111�®a I••M�IM�ui■•�MM�� 4� 4MEMI 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I III I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 11 II 100 �� CD W Do M 0 0 CO CID 'Cr M N 003 CO V CO N .- 00 lD a M N ' O CO O O O Q. O O O O 0 0 O rt 0 _" r GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS a o a Z FINES U ~ COARSE FINE COARSE COBBLES I MEDIUM FINE E RI GRAVEL SAND w o w o Moisture ! r o 2 KEY Boring or DEPTH USCS DESCRIPTION Content (%) LL PL ko o o D Test Pit No. (ft.) 0o rt rt (D °p �' rcrntB-1 22.5 SP-SM Gray poorly graded SAND with silt and gravel 10.2 m d m O___ B-3 27.5 GP Gray poorly graded GRAVEL with sand 8.9 td — B-4 7.5 SP-SM Brown poorly graded SAND with silt 28.9 SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER ANALYSIS 8.O. SIZE OF OPENING IN INCHES I NUMBER OF MESH PER INCH, U.S.STANDARD GRAIN SIZE IN MM p 0 Cog80 N 0 N-I v m p (p O O O O O Op O D O O O p 0 O. O O. O O Z (0 N q re) N .- .-(h�n N (.) d 00.- .- N 01 tt LL7(O CO.- N O. ° O i� 100 co \c) r Z 90 \\\ \ p 80 n 20 ---- m m p n- n 3073 x. ^ m 70 0lJ Z m p s 0 Z cn 3 40 -4 TI 60 (7 x. r Z O D 2. + X 50 > p 50 0)W m a '� 40 - . 60 W n ' = m -< qo s 30 m 0 = m- 20 .- m 20 A O. 10 - 90 tri Il l l l l l I I !III I ( I I III I I I I {a-17 100 cl• 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (D 0 O O O 00 (O 0 0 N O 00 (D V M N — 00 (0 � M N 00 (0 V M N CO CO ct M N ��' rt 0 D M N GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS fa)f °a a Z COARSE I FINE COARSE I MEDIUM I FINE FINES E - COBBLES GRAVEL SAND N (-0p) o m CA a' Moisture (" H. x Z KEY Boring or DEPTH USCS DESCRIPTION Content (%) LL PL rt D Test Pit No. (ft.) rr a> r o < o - N �" 0) 0 TP-5 7.0 SP Gray poorly graded SAND 21.7 ET m 0__ TP-7 3.0 ML Brown SILT with sand 43.6 N. �..... TP-8 2.5 ML Brown SILT 35.9 DISTRIBUTION E-8648 4 Copies Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. 18215 — 72nd Avenue South Kent, Washington 98032 Attention: Mr. Dan Balmelli Earth Consuhants, Inc. gc- 02R. spot -W,E Cj, • „ .. , /Y r, rl' urt - 3,v d /� h b .� X r r� a yy - a 2 / 1 A. , i k y" „4 4. c "' fir e,., t< '' d ,,,t- 34 $/r 9 �1 � J P �f / y y�. xi 1a ,t, g�' ,N; ? a z °as+ ,wr /9al=Ar � , � kfr-g,,,,,,,f 0 N-1 .& to t - py ,11-t. �3t '✓ ` x ' r fi�M : 9?� ; ''' ,/,,,, ,,',,,1r '�v .�i/rr " 6 r ^y1 *gig ., ' �'.. ,s s s / s 3 A �5< rg 7b°w %?�'a rya ' K r • � # 2 x ,,F 5 %,sH,': ai/"5. -'"., 4 -, toy ' r / Y t . q , Acf f S � ,td�x �A< d FRE .£ t p ; 2 cr . ' P •: O '17 t E✓,y v' 1: ' ' ,� , , sx zt§E2` .. .„ a k „ r ..° - s< t 2 y- .,t� y .. "r s .5 ,.,. .Ft ,.r 7 r n y C ,s: A, *" 4 , ,P ,, .Y 2 s, "„"fir 1. ,Z. s ` s S � ,v ac vv y t^ is r- s zYa,✓tr'; "�'` c:,xr„;a;. 3 Z33 �:"^Gr'7a's--..;;,� '°, 6r :,i �„ 'rv, s,"':;, f'°r.�'-, `` - ', OUR JOB NO. 6882 FEBRUARY 24, 1999 Prepared By: BARGHAUSEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT, WASHINGTON 98032 (425) 251 -6222 CO am_ ' -'I, CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND PLANNING, SURVEYING, ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES to Nfa�6 ' PRELIMINARY TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT FOR CANDLEWOOD HOTEL 900 BLOCK OF S.W. 16TH STREET RENTON, WASHINGTON DEVELOPMENT PLANNING OUR JOB NO. 6882 VP - ri*CITY OF REiv FON � � ;" FEBRUARY 24, 1999 l MAR 01 1999 I-0 • 256-7 1! RECEIVED '\<^, 9F�STE as° re" "TONAL Z 7— Prepared By: BARGHAUSEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT, WASHINGTON 98032 (425) 251 -6222 Dr- i N7 CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND PLANNING, SURVEYING, ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES s g �r,G ENctt TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 PROJECT OVERVIEW 2.0 PRELIMINARY CONDITIONS 3.0 OFF-SITE ANALYSIS 3.1 UPSTREAM DRAINAGE ANALYSIS 3.2 DOWNSTREAM DRAINAGE ANALYSIS 4.0 RETENTION/DETENTION ANALYSIS AND DESIGN 4.1 DETENTION POND CALCULATIONS 4.2 WET POND CALCULATIONS 4.3 STORM DRAINAGE COMPENSATION CALCULATIONS 5.0 CONVEYANCE SYSTEM DESIGN AND ANALYSIS 6.0 SPECIAL REPORTS AND STUDIES 7.0 BASIN AND COMMUNITY PLAN AREAS 8.0 OTHER PERMITS 9.0 EROSION/SEDIMENTATION CONTROL DESIGN 10.0 ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS 11.0 MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS MANUAL TABLE OF EXHIBITS EXHIBIT A VICINITY MAP EXHIBIT B PRELIMINARY CONDITIONS B 1 EXISTING ON-SITE/UPSTREAM BASIN MAP B2 DEVELOPED CONDITIONS BASIN MAP EXHIBIT C BLACK RIVER BASIN RECONNAISSANCE REPORT EXHIBIT D FEMA MAP EXHIBIT E SCS SOILS MAP EXHIBIT F SENSITIVE AREAS MAP F1 COAL MINE HAZARD AREAS F2 SEISMIC HAZARD AREAS F3 LANDSLIDE HAZARD AREAS F4 WETLANDS F5 EROSION HAZARD AREAS F6 STREAMS AND 100-YEAR FLOODPLAINS EXHIBIT G UTILITY MAPS EXHIBIT H1 DOWNSTREAM MAP H2 OFF-SITE ANALYSIS DRAINAGE SYSTEM TABLE EXHIBIT I CONVEYANCE SYSTEM CALCULATIONS EXHIBIT J DETENTION POND CALCULATIONS EXHIBIT K WET POND CALCULATIONS EXHIBIT L ASSESSOR'S MAP EXHIBIT M WETLAND EVALUATION EXHIBIT N PHOTOGRAPHS 1.0 PROJECT OVERVIEW - The project site is located within Section 24, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian, City of Renton,Washington. Based on a more localized description,the project is located north of S.W. 16th Street, between Raymond Avenue S.W. and Oakesdale Avenue S.W. (refer to Exhibit "A" for a vicinity map). Development of this project will ultimately consist of construction of one new building with associated parking, grading and drainage, and utility improvements. An existing wetland is located in the northwest corner of our site. The surface water runoff will be collected in a combined wet pond/detention pond and released into this wetland to maintain its current state. Approximately one-half of the site is located below the floodplain elevation of 16.58. A portion of the site is going to be filled, raising the elevation above the current floodplain elevation. Compensation for this loss of volume in the floodplain will require additional cut proposed in the northwestern portion of our site. Calculations regarding the flood compensation volume can be found in the retention/detention analysis design Section 4.3 of this report. The original site conditions are lightly forested with light underbrush. The original topography of this site gently slopes from the east to the west at a maximum grade of 4 percent. Most of the surface water flow is collected in the existing wetland at the northwest corner of our site and exits the site to the north, into an open channel flowing from the east to the west. The wetland and existing channel to the north do not reflect a high quality of water. Garbage and debris can be seen in both the wetland and the channel. The existing channel to the north eventually flows into the Black River, which feeds the Green River. 6882.008 [NJM/jss/sm/ph] Page 1 of 2 King County Building and Land Development Division TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET PART 1 PROJECT OWNER AND PART 2 PROJECT LOCATION PROJECT ENGINEER AND DESCRIPTION Project Owner Candlewood Hotel Co. Project Name Candlewood Hotel Address 8080 East Central, Wichita, Kansas Location Phone 67201 Township 23N Project Engineer Brian Smith Range 4E j 9 Section 24 Company Barghausen Consulting Engineers Project Size 2.91 AC Address Phone 18215 72nd Avenue South Upstream Drainage Basin Size 0.57 AC Kent, WA 98032 (425) 251-62 '2 PART 3 TY E OF PERMIT APPLICATION PART 4 OTHER PERMITS (l Subdivision lxxl DOF/G HPA ---1 Shoreline Management 0 Short Subdivision 0 COE 404 O Rockery O Grading O DOE Dam Safety O Structural Vaults 13N Commercial lxxl FEMA Floodplain lxxl Other O Other O COE Wetlands O HPA PART 5 SITE COMMUNITY AND DRAINAGE BASIN • Community Renton Drainage Basin Black River PART 6 SITE CHARACTERISTICS n River - ® Floodplain O Stream FYI Wetlands O Critical Stream Reach O Seeps/Springs O Depressions/Swales El High Groundwater Table O Lake ll Groundwater Recharge O Steep Slopes O Other O Lakeside/Erosion Hazard PART 7 SOILS URSoil Type Slopes Erosion Potential Erosive Velocities 0% — 20% Low 1 1 Additional Sheets Attatched 1/90 Page 2 of 2 King County Building and Land Development Division TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET 'ART 8 DEVELOPMENT LIMITATIONS • REFEREE\CE LIMITATION/SITE CONSTRAINT ( ] Ch.4-Downstream Analysis No downstream constraints ( ] Flood Storage Provide Flood Storage Compsation ( ] Wetland Undisturbed wetland on site ( I ( 1 ( J Additional;sheets Attatched • PART 9 ESC REQUIREMENTS . • MINIMUM FSC REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS DURING 0 INSTRUCTION FOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION Ix I Sedimental.on Facilities x I Stabilize Exposed Surface (x J Stabilized Construction Entrance x I Remove and Restore Temporary ESC Facilities I x I Perimeter F unoff Control x I Clean and Remove All Silt and Debris IXl Clearing an i Grading Restrictions xl Ensure Operation of Permanent Facilities I x] Cover Praci ices xl Flag Limits of NGPES l x I Constructio,i Sequence I Other Ili Other ART 10 SURF CE WATER SYSTEM • • • . • • • I I Grass Linec Channel I I Tank I I Infiltration Method of Analysis I x l Pipe System I I Vault I I Depression (-1 Open Chan tel 0 Energy Dissapator I J Flow Dispersal Compensation/Mitigation Dry Pond Ix I Wetland 0 Waiver of Eliminated Site Storage [ Wet Pond 0 Stream 0 Regional Detention Brief Description cf System Operation Underground pipe conveyance to combined wetpond/detention pond. Release flow into wetland. Discharge at natural location. Facility Related Site Limitations I I Additional Sheets Attatched Reference Facility Limitation PART 11 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS PART 12 EASEMENTS/TRACTS (May require special structural review) ( ] Drainage Easement I Cast in Place Vault 0 Other I j Access Easement ( I Retaining Vial ( I Native Growth Protection Easement I I Rockery>4'High I I Tract I I Structural on Steep Slope I Other RT 14 SIGNATURE OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER . ..:a civil engineer under my supervision have visited the site. Actual site conditions as tbserved were incorporated into this worksheet and the attatchments. To tie best of my knowledge the information provided here is accurate. sbn.dv�te 1/90 I � 6 • ' o 5 S 2.0 PRELIMINARY CONDITIONS 7 The pre-developed conditions are lightly forested with light underbrush growth. An existing wetland is located at the northwest portion of our site, and is approximately 1,850 square feet in size. An existing basin map is located in Section 2.0(refer to Exhibit "B"). All of the site sheetflows into the existing wetland, which is the low point of the property. Slopes on the property range from zero percent to a maximum of 20 percent. Most of the site has slopes ranging from 1 percent to 4 percent. Soil conditions are described as Urban Land, according to the SCS Soils Map. The surrounding regions are Puget Series. This is mostly made up of poorly draining soils and silty clay loam soils. These soils types most closely reflect Type C soils. This project will meet the requirements of the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual. Core Requirement No. 1-Discharge at Natural Location: The drainage from the proposed project site must occur at the natural location. Response: The drainage produced from the proposed developed will discharge at the same location as the pre-developed condition. The existing wetland will not be altered, and most surface flow will be fed into the wetland, therefore, not drastically altering the existing wetland conditions. A small portion of the upstream basin, located to the east, will be diverted by the wet pond/detention pond into the channel north of the property. Core Requirement No. 2-Off-Site Analysis: All proposed project must identify the upstream to be tributary drainage area and perform a downstream analysis, the level of analysis required depending on the problem identified or predicted. Response: The upstream tributary drainage area is shown in Exhibit"B 1,"Section 2.0, Preliminary Conditions). A downstream analysis and report was also completed for the proposed site. The downstream narrative can be found in the Off-Site Analysis (Section 3.2)of this report. Also refer to the Downstream Drainage System Table (Exhibit "H2") and Downstream Basin Maps (Exhibit "Hi"). A site visit was conducted on February 22, 1999. No major problems were identified or are predicted in accordance with the site. Core Requirement No. 3-Runoff Control: Proposed projects must provide runoff control to limit the developed condition peak rate of runoff to the pre-developed peak rate for a specific design storm event based on the proposed project site existing runoff conditions, and installed biofiltration measures. Response: In accordance with the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual, the proposed project will provide detention and treatment through a combined wet pond/detention pond. The three- cell wet pond will provide adequate treatment based on the calculations found in the Retention/Detention Analysis Design Section 4.2, and detention will provide the appropriate flow control based on the proposed project site existing runoff conditions (refer to Section 4.1). Core Requirement No. 4- Conveyance System: All conveyance for our proposed project must be analyzed, designed, and construction for existing tributary off-site runoff and developed on-site runoff from the proposed project. The proposed pipe system for the project must be designed for the 25-year storm event with one-half foot freeboard, and be able to convey the 100-year runoff without flooding any structures. 6882.008 [NJM/jss/sm/ph] Response: All storm drainage pipes for this project have been designed in accordance with the above A requirement. Please refer to the Storm Drainage Pipe Sizing Calculations and Backwater Analysis performed for this project. This information can be found in the Conveyance System(Section 5.0). Core Requirement No. 5 - Erosion/Sedimentation Control Plan: All engineering plans for the proposed project that propose to construct new, or modify existing drainage facilities, must include in the plan to install a measure to control erosion and sedimentation during construction and to permanently stabilize soils exposed during construction. Response: A temporary erosion and sedimentation control plan will be prepared for this project in accordance with the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual. All of the applicable temporary erosion control measures will be taken in order to properly control degradation and erosion of the site. Core Requirement No. 6 - Maintenance and Operations Manual: Maintenance of all drainage facilities constructed or modified by our proposed project is the responsibility of the owner (see Maintenance Requirement for Privately Maintained Drainage Facilities),—except King County may assume maintenance of the drainage facility constructed for normal plat subdivisions, and some short subdivisions, two years after construction approval. Response: A copy of the Maintenance and Operations Requirements for Privately Maintained Drainage Facilities is enclosed within this report. Core Requirement No. 7 - Bond and Liability: All drainage facilities for the proposed project (except drainage stub-out connection, downspout roof drainage, infiltration systems, and downspout dispersion systems for a single-family residential lot) must be constructed in conformance with the bond liability requirements of King County Code 9.04.100. Response: All bond and liability requirements for this project will be in accordance with the City of Renton standards, and will be provided through the plan review and permit issuance. Special Requirement No. 9 -Delineation of 100-Year Floodplain: If a proposed project contains or abuts a stream, lake, wetland, or closed depression, or if other King County regulations require the study of the flood hazards, then the 100-year floodplain boundaries shall be delineated on the site improvements. Response: This project is located within the 100-year floodplain established by FEMA and is shown on Exhibit "B 1." The portion of the site that is being filled above the 100-year floodplain elevation is being compensated by creating a larger volume around the existing wetland. See the Retention/Detention Analysis Design section for calculations of the compensation floodplain area. 6882.008 [NJM/jss/sm/ph] ANALYSIS I 3.0 OFF-SITE ANALYSIS Included in this off-site analysis is the Level 1 drainage report. Please refer to this for the downstream drainage path analysis and basin report. 3.1 Upstream Drainage Analysis: Based on a field investigation performed on February 22, 1999, the upstream drainage basis has been delineated and is found to only include a portion of the site to the east, consisting of.57 acres. The upstream basin is well kept grass that sheetflows on to our property. This upstream basin was ignored in the calculations in order to conservatively calculate the size of the combined wet pond/detention pond. The surface water flow from the surrounding developed sites is collected and diverted around our site. 3.2 Downstream Drainage Analysis: The surface water flow exits our site to the north from the existing wetland into a open channel with an approximate 8-foot bottom width. This open channel conveys the surface water flow from the east to the west, and eventually flows into a large underground vault east of Oakesdale Avenue S.W. The flow is then released from this underground vault under Oakesdale Avenue S.W.and eventually is released into the Black River. The developed conditions will release the same flows as the pre-developed conditions. Therefore, there will be no adverse impacts to the existing downstream path. 6882.008 [NJM/jss/sm/ph] '-1m• LEVEL 1 DRAINAGE ANALYSIS FOR CANDLEWOOD HOTEL 900 BLOCK OF S.W. 16TH STREET RENTON, WASHINGTON Aal OUR JOB NO. 6882 FEBRUARY 22, 1999 Prepared By: BARGHAUSEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT, WASHINGTON 98032 (425) 251 -6222 �GH.4(i NS i %/ 2 CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND PLANNING, SURVEYING, ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES �?g. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 PROJECT OVERVIEW 2.0 UPSTREAM DRAINAGE ANALYSIS 3.0 DOWNSTREAM DRAINAGE ANALYSIS AND PROBLEM SCREENING 4.0 RESEARCH REVIEW 4.1 RECONNAISSANCE SUMMARY REPORT 4.2 CRITICAL DRAINAGE AREA MAPS 4.3 FEMA MAP 4.4 OTHER OFF-SITE ANALYSIS REPORTS 5.0 SENSITIVE AREA FOLIOS 6.0 SWM DIVISION DRAINAGE INVESTIGATION REPORTS 7.0 WETLAND INVENTORY MAPS .. 8.0 CONCLUSION 1.0 PROJECT OVERVIEW The proposed project site is located in the city of Renton, north of S.W. 16th Street,between Raymond Avenue S.W. and Oakesdale Avenue S.W. This is within Section 24, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian. • The project site is approximately 2.91 acres in size, with forested conditions and light undergrowth. The field visit revealed very moist conditions, which may indicate a high groundwater table. The existing upstream basin consists of a small 30-foot-wide strip to the east of the site. All of the surface water flow sheetflows to the existing wetland on the site. The existing wetland is a small depression located in the northwest corner of the site. The existing topography of the site has slopes ranging to a maximum of 10 percent. 2.0 UPSTREAM DRAINAGE ANALYSIS Based on a topographic map and a site visit on February 22, 1999, it was found that the upstream basin consists of a 0.57-acre well-kept grass lawn directly to the east of the site. This upstream basin sheetflows onto the subject site and then continues to flow down to the wetland. The existing developments around the subject site collect and divert surface water flow and bypasses the proposed site. 3.0 DOWNSTREAM DRAINAGE ANALYSIS AND PROBLEM SCREENING The Off-Site Analysis System Drainage Table and the Downstream Drainage Map show the downstream path for the surface water flow. All of the surface water is collected into the small depressed wetland on the northwest corner of the site. The flow then exits the site to the north into an existing open channel. This open channel has a approximate bottom width of 6 to 8 feet, with a longitudinal slope of approximately 2 percent. The open channel conveys the surface water flow from the east to the west for approximately 500 to 600 feet. The flow is then diverted into an underground vault just east of Oakesdale Avenue S.W. After exiting the vault, the water is then conveyed to the west going through a series of culverts and catch basins. Ultimately, the water is released into the Black River. 4.0 RESEARCH REVIEW The following is a description of each of the resources reviewed in preparation of this Level 1 Drainage Analysis: 4.1 RECONNAISSANCE SUMMARY REPORT This site is included in the Black River Basin. 4.2 CRITICAL DRAINAGE AREA MAPS The proposed site is located in the city of Renton, therefore, the flow control and water quality requirements will be determined under further review of this project. 4.3 FEMA MAP Please see the attached FEMA Map utilized for this analysis. As indicated by this map, the proposed project site lies within the floodplain. As part of the development of this site, an existing portion of the floodplain will be filled to an elevation above the current floodplain elevation. This will require an area of compensation, so the existing and proposed floodplain volumes are equal. 4.4 OTHER OFF-SITE ANALYSIS REPORTS A review of the basin study and site investigation were conducted for analysis in preparation of this Level 1 Drainage Report. A U.S.Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service Map is also provided. 5.0 SENSITIVE AREA FOLIOS Based on a review of the King County Sensitive Area Folios, it was found that the subject site does not lie within any sensitive areas. 6.0 SWM DIVISION DRAINAGE INVESTIGATION REPORTS King County has no drainage complaints within one-quarter mile of the subject site. 7.0 WETLAND INVENTORY MAPS Review of the King County Wetland Inventory Maps revealed no recorded wetlands within one-quarter mile of the project site. A wetland evaluation was provided by B&A,Inc. Their investigation revealed a small wetland located in the northwest corner of the site. 8.0 CONCLUSION The proposed project has a very small upstream basin, as well as a very simple downstream drainage path. All of the surface water flow from the site is found to be conveyed effectively, without problems, to the Black River. Proper detention and treatment of the surface water flow after development should not have any negative impacts on the downstream path or on surrounding properties. EXHIBIT A VICINITY MAP 0 c a H n e , I +VG toy c Ill[ 1 Y ?11F',Am 's 1 9 p9 .^,< 1 Ja i �g lGGyIra azro , a i i� VIDOYER.. Wittt -mAll LJ ea.cr �$' ��v _ t ,�_t ,p A .., ; -�u �r8 v • �, oo ,• TN �y V � a , " r %, 9 f 1 nnwVER • . a. ,, (3 rg-�i p'� 7�` i a \s,,,,, u j- r' CO •�� iii a�®e away #` 'mpTfi- 1111. ai k 4 J "'"'oreC t' ` 2 n J' 1S7 yam�,," ��� '. r ,. . � °t aac� 3 r� ^it r• l�• , N v,T.aA�Ale Mr ' /i I RV C _ 69m AY '- 1 ,,• ... -I 'rD. ( .,0.,y x � ' "G h`+rais .. ~ �I '+ �° \ [ALE `i'm"_ �^l .d�ii d.+tea . 1 '4 I.. ��AAV '; InNara .�; t kry.'tj r7 ram, 3t ii: RR . .\\ensq, - •.^y,.�,I� 1 b° . � ', 't Fu'� yyi ?'4 a n 'df�. I �p a a 1'/TH AV T.fie. rr a 'mod• x.. ( e,. ..c. V, .V A '311k. 'ge''I I = ���5 5 arc f�, }.� ,,1 x, ° >u"� \ ( xo ' `�'� j ( �n i .,..JlS (r � '.,fir r•'.rr I \ .\•Gr x,,. s� N /12" n , r r +- �a 1 KEG' ,,,,,, .... ,,, ..... MEM ,...„:1-14,44.--„,;-..,..L.,,,7911f1 1 iriiir"p' ,,,..„,t.ar;,..* Ft: I ' Pr '"411, did Ar s 0 „ ,, , ,,,,,,,,.,..,8 , i4,47-tvsy.4.,,,,s4, ,.1..hn.. 11 t;14,Itri,*:44,4:1‘ssfjoi FtiTi .r... ,...,,,,,',..+.'cir4,6,1,4664..._, 4 le ;i 4.1 i,:"N• omi .e =8 4. i +.•..RhO rAY Sk 'Yr M '+- APr. x-r wi (� ,•is ,� �rFxT`i r. fi� mid` 4. t ' s �1 &TH �na� R G R5 �y '' � .4 � erTx Xr s i+_i o .mew , ;' ir, �„ • .' H,C,rW,o"'t. i �, IiL� IM Av.-$M � �h T�!!t r M Ei ma , c A A • . nil A . Will.:11,v N SI 'c -"'S { ' Y' ./,. ,. i i AV sv,,......v.w,,F,..... 4... ,-",AIIILS11 sw r �y.RD*a.'Al sy > : 2 '461-4 1 a A31r7 r� ® ®ro'` a A� �d,< +8 N`AY b IN R■N J Tr -, Y ~n . ,o,rc `v.:3• illy, �ca .. /sEll 5'147e vot t,.o Ar �'' tvA ife !. `+stib `c ��� , T KAV S �w. .100 e. = 'n xi d +,R`� Y., ae'. ry= ,...AV 5 R I. �^ r 3,6, .„Eau._, , z , N?r, rP,wr'; �k �s • Via,® .Y n s' g �,'v'y +itR z :��i,6 T �r 01. • yyy i s 4CSNj9 „ , 6!1 u ms s... Sf - .5aj�M? }�.�y.« AV• s�i y{\v`E 3# y � .,�\ \:�L�II��lll s ,e e� Cl ri,,,,bIV' ar yS lEU(R S. !1.414, 4-• , 6 .CEO XILL � �� MTh,r i .a� .r 1 w � rr K s� ^5... {� AV S nfTa'.PEL�.V": .,1 y.,F, 0 . `Q.v.-, -.„, per{a - AV ::d' 5 , �• ;°Y r, 5 '3r�. '. .:�"c' * '\y° ' F.0C1 G. `x`AV . \_g . .- a ' y' ". , • 1, lY GRi 'I "� , ,c 4 if ,~t f 74,' Nz �11_ ,8 Iv 4 n sE k T .,,...r+ A �+St'„"1,,, t �.2 t a, ,,,.. v5*�., $ ©I \��.:, •� 4 r: 11 2 EXHIBIT B 1 EXI STING ON-SITE/UPSTREAM BASIN MAP a [ = r�r�r-r II ire r n /�17 n 111n1/� n RI _-. -_ 11 I _ -_ _" _ _It-XL/II NI _ Cil _ _ •k+.".'" -_ �• t / _____.-____________.-..1 5-_.--___.---L---L----7-:---.:27-____-___i_-_.----_-:__-:4--=:------==---- -, .x- . . ^ 1.4 . i6.331c.un 1R.^W . ._ _.. DRAINAGE J111 i ,7,)z ; i6..x �- E :� 11 / r-40' U oW -��lA.m `���z//r C ..`\i6.00 I,j 1 • 18.5.",• 0 10 20 40 2 1• •'1 1t ,'t.';`t` ` . ` JAI Si' SITE ' 0^.• ; • 15.6.4 %! 1 i 1 ,y,� , :/ i6.42 ' '+,ia.xi !, 1 \ 11 TSLG ,• , �7 ; I •15.56 � 2p ^� �3 Cn U O 1 .5 1,Ci.•.M/ ,F. f ! i ! 16.M ,,t 117 0G ^C' O • `t i % �i , ,14.0:: j 1 -.t `.`, • iB.251 \'.. Z W f 15.M., ,J 73p • i ; i, 'a 1i�i9 0 :SAO / 16.34 , : :6:30 :?.60 I 1 .29 11 < *:8.w • O Z I •I . 4. 'r*1 1i :6.tYJ ` ;e: 7 >:.700.7171,.744.3: •� y.00• t7.01M i ', t i i 1 : �' Z m Q } :fi::X) 15.0('A14.043.10 . �'•` ) :�.2U I / •• 16.53 -.%' t 16 x' ..__..r' i II .r 37- - 1 ' U IT • i i I i4 `/' /` t 15.0:: �.00 ; !f5.00 i�-`i`•.xt 'i i�.,.M •.? 17.45 }• 6.70 r Q I i 1 ; ,'I.. �%� • ,5 16.M ,, 1 17.65 _ i },5. S ( ! J6 • tt�. I f 1 Ovr I • "4,7.M 1?.^.41 / I r S 1 ; r t ( t i11 7.M 1 t j i ,/,'• ''`•�}1i i ! • 15.74 l f ••-•1t,u eC��1 ` •5 •13.46, i E I ! / r1` '`12 ° 7 i --- /r15.00 • :4.T9 II i j t �' f6.9 �_. N . CO1 I T 2.•YO, J / i ; ---,�:Z_•'T.,t 1 Y/ 1< 18.26 •o` i iI f I;` �'i /1 j *JP" f' f,s.. ; 1 ...ISM •16.5.16.5, v7 1 ,\ �, o m m i 1 ! i%' 1s.4t^.,5.i0 is.9U �.+-iF2:fi i i/ Q 1 �~ z I <'•4.Rn 'CO 0 t 0 • :o 5! :F>.OU f 17:Xi 18.C7(15 UG ;:4.(TU1 k' 7„' i i/ �aw�A'�r Z z < rn t1 i j --.fi.M I ! i , % '�75.4C, I \ tB.M ;i'6i.�:?:, r a 1 1 ,� 15.C•0 / / \ .� :g EF r�r W a'a X i 1 1 � / 'I, i / ! 16.64 W�jJ ! U m'E ', j i i ; :s.o �95 ?55vrd f i6.M �"'. I- \ J t0 \E _ ; 15.00 �f.' t 1 ;• t •1 f �A ` f Q` 1 ''FB.UC• 1 W W Q t - i5.0:: - i t 4. 16.J6 /v�/ v :7.T4 1 ~ (n GiEr �r c rn w ` . :5.:0 -.Sp1E.29 j` i .r�'<B,pp"'-�1 ,6.^..4 On �Q.M 1732 ' U Z _ a,j ` •;s U:; :1 .' ry • �•` i �--'" r� ;B.J•3 �� 1 = 1- Q U ; i ;' /'• ' ,E.00 / f 1 0 Q it ,. \ ` tl 1r 1 •6 C4ifi.19 r ' j W ' O p > 00 t j ! ZI j L11 1g co 1 16.92 J co w r-- ,8.2 •tis 20 .1 / i • 1 1 t /. :5.94 • 15.70 4.90 J 1 {. -... 5.69 / I Z .00 1 j :5.i2l5. 14.A5 '.,,1T4,80 1 ".,,M 1 ! Q Z i fi.73•15.20 i / 14.1•U j,5.^w /l 16.x } nC4)17.42 \\` 17.39 t 18. &i@.'3 j 0 g d Y ���TTTt��'��•��S• 1 .-#ES4r/ / • j4 33!/ l / �` • 115.4G `g• 11 i I ry O ��-< 0 1 ! // •14.39 / / `\'�7.M tf o.` f5.60,690 1'' ;i - ; { I 1<.00 15.4: 5.00 %' 18.CK: I. Q • 181 ga 17.00' 16.£3.00 15.42 / ,5.28 ;f i' <16:IU , ``� • ;i 7C. [ ff • 17.60 `... /1-- >< 1• ! 15.54 / •1<.� // /! T7.U015 •17.62 \•17 00 • 16 4:3 >j 7 00 i -.1 C�..-._..__j c 17.71 .-0 h 18.0ti (1 `; C2.�� m ; y§ o i J, ' S' :5.21 ''f1...Ri r '% Fs22 1&.O1 ' �, •1� N o 6 Y i J ^� ! ! 1..32 ��gg 1 1S.• S [.2 U : i / to e • 14.79 •,iti?53 ;' /' / •.17.E2 ,7.4A \ • 16.50 i 1.\`''` `� 0 z. 1 1* • 16. •7.1fi J 97{013^' • i6.A2 �`. "•--_� Nv' ' i l 1 • 14.32 i - -- 17.83 13.20 1�` • Ix'Y..2_•` .1 "'97 it �o�• W arc a i I i • • 1 1.42 :5.55 3't'S.J`34.64 --s..13 95 %% ' 1.92 `` • ,?.,7 t 7•: 7p l `"`I4• - - - _ w N +' 1$.4U tg::�.#fi 10 �.13.9A /, 14.A9 /•% t 1600 \` • 182611‘ :.BS • ``•7.58 ,:7.21 • •7.03 7?.&« ,�� \• ,9_•• , a rt N N • O N OD =¢ 1 \ < i5 76 :4.0( .3.6 1s.DJ • I • t?5 co m coO:z sn • I < lA.�[i\... N 1 I 4• \. 15.40'•. 17.43 17.37 17.:9 w w 0 18..10 \ • .4 y1i 4i32 • 15,48: `,� 17.SA .^`sfsy.C(' ', 3 N:n c2� • 19i0 ,i \..\ i ,'.S.AS j F4,?3.69 - 74.56 i :5tii • 15.:5 ._ • •_.-_J 1A.C•Ci \. :n N N z C \. c 14.<K: %13.95 14 30 ;5.9� �� • •7.35 ;B.OQ \ N Z N N \`•- R `6.30 -' I • :8.:2 .t • 17.9E • 17.76 • 17.297.1217.42 1?Ii�? `` A•' •Q.7f. I N. cN Y�� -,N ` . I ,��.17.00 ` --11 1' 14.97 • 14.47 1 • \ •17.90 • •w 1 C �l1 16.19 _ \ ,17.3017.67 . �17.01 t. "',. -J 4.25 • 14..• , S'.+;,) a. i • 16.69 • ;629,, i 1?.c7 . \ • • 15 15 71 f IX.CB a'� EX S MH \, t , . 1•.06., . 17.3 • 17.15 iR,3t•-- -o.�a ',�I y.f K.844, �1 N�. �a0 M .... _ .55 ,/ < : 17.W-_-._.-._._-_----�42.99_.._.._.___.._. 1 . 1 IEa15.03 24• '9:2 .2._ ! Sd , 3�,_ +..._.._. r•R-06•-_-_� .. :::0 15.E : 1& _ W F� GJ RIY•21.4 f3'^•'bf' _ .. �.:.-... i- ..._..-�y.iY.3-_.... dd IE=5.9(24'E.W) �--19,i''i'_--..49aX+•___._. .. ,.__._-.:.. 1� �•_ .- �•�. __.-_ _. __._.._._,-' ___..- ^�•': -_ ,a._ - � J i • 9.55 ,, • ?s.65 • , ..-... .._.._�.•iA-[N-.- -.--_ al . �.._�____.. -_._----ft�-.....-...._._.____...._ ...,8'30.-............-_._.... ig• r-^'.._ --1t=1S.se-2 g 0 • 111"1 ) .,1's- a.;�,s' ...., FX 24'4S ........_.._.._.-._ -S - _ 67 24�55._--•�--' •I1.' ._...._iai_-_ ,1,_ _ ..�Qf.•''•!<4•�Y = 1;' 2 ti. .,i v --- _ 2:`v' s^ `'`t'fiK_ {1`.aS'IX• ,• •$ Q ,t\ •. .a •. .•rr••.••�.. --- - -�..�•_•••••-••..sryF..•••..r ••.....-•24yr..•••.•.••••..�... ..( 1--�__ "Gi, a.. \.J z IX.24'SD /� Ex.24 5D y SJONAL EHt' �f1>, aJ N IX.CURB Ro 2 / RIM=21.13 '^ _.uRB p 00 RIM=20.7 IX.GHT IX.STREET LIGHT IE-14.4(24'E,W) IX. STREET LICHf N 1 ,..,':: �2c..5 NTSIBIP� IX.SIREEI LIGHT IE-6.48 84' yll IX.STREET 11CHT EXPIRES or Or _ _ �+.4� - - - ---=�1�- ---31yc- - �=t-6F•- _ - --�?i.3T - - - -IE-&48�(?4�--e0.9P�- .�1E7L3 HLSTLPE �f16.9?- (D IE-2.23(E-•S) wl_ -1.Ii EX.CURB_ CITY OF RENTON �L17 IX.PLANT STRIPE N I 1•EPARTINEIVT OF PUBLIC WORKS • rt R EtL PANT ST�IPE //-- -24.:3 - Cl::C a �y�/ C4� 2:.CG:T 2'i"- EX.CAS L91E•2'2'J r--- -B6..G22II ^••�• _ - EL'JJ21•SW- - -•- - - -_G -FX�CURBr- - - -r- - - -r- _ - _•_ - - -. • Sit �6t STCI B , -r- - - •- _ - - -- O / _ Ex_ _ Z --+.,.-;.. ,----iai:. r-r,_-,- -.. ,"4n$F -1-:---- -:i--- --- --,-,•"d9 .r! ---_ -- rz S;'7.,s!>irL'*!4-•• .-cat.. -xnr- _xer« m _ 1 •21.06 '•. .77•7. ., - +�3v%1" - .S't, "s. s!:79-: -T.:7 .�.. .ir...i:;�iY�?► '-2H'H'�%. -r. i'E' :}..: r.y.,•,,��� ,i..[^.:i.� Y.`:•'- .{. Yy.:. .�1,'Df�:"SOEMIµ3E:: r•.� -• ,•• a..,_�__.. ��_,_i ..._.!� a: .....:.__.__-..:_._ • •_,.. q:�:_,_....___"_'______�Lii._1_q4.y}�:-,��,i�-•'_::aaM:a::ta_� . s_yv�.+s=✓'s.•Sty.i1��'-_____ _•.._a_1=ice .�_ 2/12/99 PRE M0. p2Q- .._ i�T-?t!•s {r.�tfL___1 _.__._._.�_: .._, _ -_ __ -_ - OICI® DK@ CALL! PHD•OOIL_- o __ __ __ 011A1M, MFB Z •221.3 1n MOM try ArTR RA.. *MOVED 1_ O. EXHIBIT B2 DEVELOPED CONDITIONS BASINS MAP STORM DRAINAGE 1-1LAN .vi _. .. " - .:. ...___.. --7:27-":7 -7:':-17:1:==--- -•:•:::-E---- • ...--:--.--_:----.L-----::•----_-.2.--.:-:____........_..- _ ::::=4=___=________ . ..-.... - • •. ,-- __ (/) ...----, .__ i- -.-..-.. ---__•-...----x----x---W- . • Ll.1 ----- • • • airV'' '''''..---.-..--1127---IrW7-..--- . -..--------.......--------1:::--- - ----7-- - r ;• _.....- ._ 11.1-c->. 1 I ...-- 41-1-55:--x---"-"- X ./. - --'-i --f"'" 18.S3 -... -..... I I ..--"----- -- --gaw-- e44r3 - - X x . 15 20 1.5r44 ;s... 15.20 ,16.00 r i7 00 / 't.O.') ' l'•82 •-__.---- ___ 39-1•87,1, F z • 15.90 ............,.................- ...1.•pri, ...••.•...:::::::.. 1. - ---- - .........,*::::i.:&.::, I "8'75 co 0 ______ --,-- / ..... . ............ ................... _ _1 ,- ----0,--s--,,-- IA D.,. 11.4-•--•'100.-.14:r. ti '' a ,3 LOW _,., n n ••••• ••••••••••••• -, 1 __.-tit....NE ...... .V81.11 :...ii,W4•:;: ::::::::•!.::::':j•:::: • ,...\ 1-40. . ., . . H , 1 I , „ . ::::.- ::•:'.X,I,,,,.., . .. , of --••-•q!:::::•.ii,:.n,m.. 4, . 10 20 1600 -•---.. -,,,,,,-', . . . ... , , :::••:::x.,,,,,::,- .:.irr , , \A . EALT ,' / • ..,..,..• •••.,..:::-..•:•:•:.:,•:•.... --.',,•••••,..-.--•------' -----t- ••..ogipiiiiii-..i...,:•• -••'•.1004'ior;•im..:....-.7...•••<•••• ••-•..i•-•• •-•'.., i -:::-::::140,4:4. ii.</ ..., . •. • it < ....-„.....„... .. ., ..,.....„,,., i l -I.•••3./....;,..." .../______‘.--- .0 .i. , , .. ,.,, . ,., 1 4040><Irto;,,, . .: c6 o . ! 11•CI .1 /II • ' /14.00 ,i . ?: ', --,,/ h 1)" ------ ---- ----a.,------ II 0 0 I.' °• ----:- ' V Z-4/06\(.. AiNiiiit:Cli.A!li.A:''''''''''::- ''-' . eig I .:•:::::i!'i;MiSMIllii-'':gieg EWE II 0 „I / • 14.7cyi"'X) ••4 ''' 87' • :1 0 li W / / t•'` /*/ ;14.00"15.00 "t], //15•°?/ /1,., .t 11;,;31..'3 -„,,>.i. /7 ,,,., '" --.4 .*...":: :'. '- -- - - - ' '.- . '0 41437 ::.":::.:::•.:::::::::::-: sZ F- 0 Z _J 1 / , I 18.29 • I: II 0 III . 0 ! r -. •!,` --•••••••••- ••••••••••••••,....,-.„......„..,:, . 18.42 , / . 1 e.'-gcl•' -;1 1 I :•A::i:i::.,..--:--:;....'.:-Ii.::.:mi,:::::::::E ".:••::Al.:-Mm:MN];:::n;:::,,,:!kift:.:..• .,;', < • la- 15CK, / . , ..,......-...,...•. - •• -.... •••• ••• . • A....... . .. .. . . . . ' MiEriNtlr. . ••, . l'.;.'.:u•-••:, i 0 0 0 I '13.20 i '''' '--•''/ ' ••' ,'-'''.:••L-','•'•':••••'•''''''''''''' L.--• .' ' ‘-'''- '''''''''''''''' ''.•' -.4' 4it 117 I ' i •"4"34,09113.19 ••• ..41' I I "..., / / -• / s•••• •i ki. T • 1Y 37 1 ' < Ci)1 i I I j ,1 ''' - ••,'' --- r /• ',.. / ..,,::•,:.,.:....:' 48.00...,,..*:- .. ,/ I 1 ., .rj- 7.45 ; ilta.7a ‘'. 0 j I I 1 29.- ,, d• I ,I . •, •,'„,....----- ,- ••••• •-:••::Mii:;:"r/ :".k...Z.,;••••;,,,,./ /150487 i \ ... • -...",. ,- 10. : • , r I i r i i 1 i. ,,i'' 7,- , u (12.0 f ' ,,,, •::-•,:',:;::-:-Am. • ; ' i i j .•\A k i - -;• ' •... .. • , ! , :-••:,. / • • . •16.5 6.;.:........i.r.i.. : 1 '. l' 1:21:46 11 i / , / P):10POSED BUILDING '71"-;•411:-.-22_ i \ • I .. , PROPOSED Plpg/h* 0\ \ ... / •-- . .., 7,,,:-: 1. \ i / , . „ -8 _ - . ... I 15.0o • ; . ii.•;.?, \ -- II / -1. .,. lir, D COR4PEINISTATIO , Pir Ali , :v.k,-.:4.,. ..-...:.,,.,.....,:-/.. ....:::.,,i.-,.......„..ii::. -,...1:, ...... „, ....„_ .---- ,.. - II i \ 815.4 4. ..::!;ii"..:giije.' J;',..- / ...,i! , .,•'' „• \ ..- • : t. 5 ,p,..x, i 1:,00 160.0(1500 k,4.00; Vale600• ; '':::::''Ri'D-:-:: :::•.A]:•'','. ...4;.r . . •I-!•,••,;.::..., ••'' •'•' 1, eanstpi Z- I. .1-Z•..; 1 , I • : • 8. .:,...1 1 \ II 1 >•- 1 '0 0 ,5•E 0 Z (0 i 1 I \ • s--- / / -,:,::.: /.:...„K,:.„.:*;•:.i.:*.,......,-,,g.,17..]:•...4..,:az.:-,-.,..).... ......,...'„t„,•;;,-....-..., .,„..:WP:•••• •..7„........,...:.•-tf,,,,..:::....,•.,"!T.: :•••.:•...,-,,.•' II••••:. . ":.,••••••.',, •• • 0, 19.1,,,,. 16.70 J.Z% 16. • .11 ; * >"4 l' ' u) CA L 1 --- ' ', I .' .*'""•-.4iiig.l.4 :::::,,,•• • ,--.- -- -1•.--- ,. ?,..\-•-:,-'-'z's•C't•liaMA`ti,7•':•.'ea.:‘,;:.7-;:;..:•:','S...;':• 1 •,ts..-. a_ k.„1„5 0 0 1 -;,...%_ • li , 5 1-.1 a- . . - ::•:::, • ' ' ' /''''''''''-'''.' :'''' • '72‘;,7-f.;;.0.J."!-''., ..::•:!..:,:•:Ciii-Zi.:;.:'''.-,-„7.;-:',13::•:;-!-.% \ • T:_. - " U 1:4 '?A` LLI , L1 ‘ •\....-...--. .„ , ,' •'.,. :-- .,, . ••,. ' F \ 0 cc uo \ i iz.c F =. =E m 3 `r•-• \ \.. 1 I . . !r, , 1 k"::*.k.t." " ?_•.;1.7..1. I .E 0 ,_ , • •• ....,,/ -:•-,:.,: : !..••-•;• -• ,^Z. .w .. I \ 0 r „ .I.,...4 'I 1 ' ---- ...‘• ,•:. •t40.,x1 ... .. . --1 z 1732 I :coo I• I _i_ 1-- <-...- e • .,:..,., • -rx, '1„tesSAIr v i - 64 -'-1 - , - --...... ,-, . •••••••-f- n U) 0 . - ' (1.2.7 Ae... ,-.,,„. 6 ,4' AG •,„, .....-; 1 i ui •: - < 0 <-- -,•'•i' ' !i 0 L i < r \'\ \ I\ 4 ,- , ..r....,•• / LLI / cp ., •. • 4^'s e's....‘.7•,,,,,.... i D / g •!,4 - > , i ..! , ,. ,t• • ';.'..i,-, lie.7p 19Ce) CO 1 § ,?1 \ •.. 1440 . ..*•:- I ..:: ----:111VN\ / \ --.• „..,., - - -•.• • • .• 55 / Z , W.// I: I 0 ,, .: I „ 4 _IF 63 \ ‘ , s ,. _ :,I , f it, r--- ..e.zo Z\'CI \ It I'•':- c4:::'---:'- f . - . - ,-.: ,,, •,S.V: . Z .. ; 5;;; 17.00 i I -•••:-1- . .,•-e ..-.:. 4>3 1 / 0 - 1. 0 kermm 1 ; ,e o., • - •---- -- • - ' •,I, ,...., I I . .1 .20 • - ' - 0 • 1 _. . ..„. .. .... . 7.39, ,.-41 16 3 18.23 I1 I 2 g < g x I - a. il '. -, ,, , , ,. ' , .l ,-..-:, I . ; , , ; . .;. ; . .,.. , ...- • ;6.7, -,,,' 6.45 :e-.., • 6,941e -i-a: ' 1 q) 0., 11 I g .g .... i - ' IC-57-; 16.6 Ile f : if i ,..••• II I ii_ AUI .4.;111- „ ,„, ,..,_ ,,,:c: r is.c* , 1--:. i :v:fi Lill 5 1 . ... i .„,. .. - -- 11.1:1:t1111M1W6 1 I . • -••• . -- -- -:.---:::: ,, .., ......... -.. • i _I .:?WW1% •-•• ---. .4- ,r I jrs- , i , ilt 61 1 9. - fa • 1 ,,,, . •,'""-: ..,?..' / ..,.., ',. • • • i : '' i ,, .,.-,... el .,1 - ' - - \v.>.•. ' .,.. ' B ..„--- . ,..._, :.,,,,,. , , .. k.v......00 :•sj.: e X 113-02 .-- - o 0• , : , ....• ..:. _............_ . --. D Z -.. 0 tAl • 17.48 \ c'' Hill X 0 / r ' t - Li , . 1' , ' ,..,. '`,!.41•• ••`1‘-'.• ., "21 I-' :)° ) „ •-•___ \ ••• 18.8., •---_, 19.00 ...0.--___---_____ , If, La 0 X c, < -e 1 ,K .. • , „,,„ • A e7 I 6..• --- --... -' 7.•.' -17. 17 :".•;', •-i.• La 4 ... 4,,,•••••4 L.-. - - - • ,..t '24 i I „y• " < 0.i., ;:i.:..g,...;. :,0,- , .5 C6 ,':' 1 4.(5 6 , es 5 0 10 kc ., 19. 1 '•7-(-•..,::•' I \ \ts.00 • -.... •a.,...,.....- ......... --... ......... ......- . ........ ........ --- -..... 'I'-'• •:•aI•'•:r ,••••-•• • ' •••• '''.± ..41•-•';'i)%.. --• -.21"6 z GT,(0 90 GG La 6 1;•;14 --, --. I le4c 11 L n-r-9c‘ji c'' < i A --... s sit. • • -••• s• 0'... - • •.,-.. • CV CV z F 1.8 •191,3-,_ • a„,4... N.. •:• . .-'''''.....„,.. 18.00 .. A, -,----, w ••••..'., •f" i\ ‘ t7-1 12 t4.1 n -, --,,,,,, r • - ': •..'.' 4.K----`1"---...- ,' . • - . • !...........:1 , ' ,, , ,fr, .• \ :i::j '4 ‘-•, L _.-.I 7.i'r) Vi •, . . • \ 0 .. __ ..u_IP alEE1.:5803 -...,,,______ Lo.„ 41, .. -,: 19,67 ,............. N.. . 17.i6 .„.„ '', - •.,...,,,- ,,,- .....,,,................,..,,,,... ---,-•- ......,..:: ::::, A -66' R_clt.M.21.14' IE.5.9(24'E.W) \'''- '••••, ••••---1,3.n'ti4g,........---'.----- .A1''''''-c'"-z----- !„. - ..., .--.7.---- - ..."..:._-....:=.-z1:-..----- ----------:::::::::-Fr• - -.---.:- 9---.7::-c-----,..-444:::----------------------- ---4:--- ::::::::::::::-- a. . 7::-.-------- 441--------- ::-' ''''''-'1:''''44.'''''''. . . - 03 k , . .... „,, As„, <•• . , 9.5S . •0.03 • 19-.65 , 20.0:7; .:0.... z' it- . ..........,? s.._•-'•-'"-:- - ',...^--.,---•......,,..:4..--.,...,..-•:.-:.;--2:. ..,'"--,...C* • . ,...., ji11,01•fzEr----r-V. .-••.% .144-- ,..; :3...1-1.4.- _---.,r ,--.....-r.--1.-.1.1.-.."-}1 , _ ... __---7.7.- - ........ ..•..... , -•• ' .....,,...,....___ -.44\oz.2,5672_:"./, 0 '; b, i -• - -----*4,•!,-----•-••• _- __ C•14 - 7*---7- ..._7:-.3.3--4-.-gb--- <firer sisf••••c.\ 'S'e ' r ,3- z EY.24II-SD EX.20-SD EX. ..... A. /0//eT-L•l" 110.1 $ A EX.CURB Ei t C°‘' CB RIM-21.13(7) 161.4=20.7 EX STREET LIGHT 1E-6.58!"VO I. oi a.STREET UGHT I EXPIRES EX STREET UGHT tE-14.4(24'LW) EX. STREET UGHT iE-6-48 "Ey;.6.90--• - _'1'.1EX,_PME_STFIP_E -_.. .6. 2. (NI rc 7;74,__ _EIS.ENNT_SIRIFE__ --;-:L.4.9.- - - - -..-447-..1.,-- --.-21,4a- --94-55- 21.66,- - - • 1E-2.23 5"S) L', VI EX.CURB CITY OF RENTON- f- - _ _ _ _ _._ _ _ - - - CaEPARTMENT OF rue_ic WORKs EX.PAINT STRIPE ii- 10,612 -a- 7,14 • UNE ... • c:1.-... e . Z1.61 . 21,69- . EX r UNE' •21. - d Ex. 12'W .,,,,,4-EX•cuR8 4 SW 16th STRgET 12-_,/ _ • . • •-2,11(.,- -.- - - I.- - - -.' . 21.06 CD :`,,777:i7::•777';?.t!:77(7.7.;t7;7.J.-7:::ZT.:•••••:'Ot..: -.41061•LAOGY.:;,-.2,--a-s-:.4,'f,L'',--....,-•-%,"....;-%-•,- ,. , ,.•:i^... .-••-• ...., '....' ...:, ...:•a•: .v•• • •:--,••..,"•••••"•.'";•*".'-•w,..•f_.z..,'1-114,',i;_ytik44........:.-.!...1 •••......!,_.!.......rs.c.4.e..,_-,.... -- ,..r... DIEROMID SOS 0 1 d Z - ...• -.•.'".:!.i.:474.:i6.c2id,---..,---;*-,:li.,!!;;I:..1:14:46:", ,-• ' '..-.'•.'.........-.Z,11...V.a...:_-_.:•:";:l.f...........................................- --.. -•-,..;=•-'....-4.4.1.4,--. _ --- __ - DRAM 'Are CFCCOM DNB DATE 2/12/99 SCALE .,FL!NM Ili FELD IK.EPAGE___ __ •221.3 lei SIMON lir APPR 0All All""P O. 7 ,...;_. . EXHIBIT C BLACK RIVER BASIN RECONNAISSANCE REPORT • 1 (. ' ` .- '\ Geri -.. `I�1I G",*/*1)nGhL k ( .�/ ''Y C-- - ._..- / GOek �.� iah Amer _ '�M Cherry Creek 1 -\. ' i B10BW Toll RAW • SK ISH - " :hIMWa Creak It E.aI 1 T't -� � � Jd t p�Qi�0113 ---- N�ria Gxk ,....�.n. .� i , S. ¢ LF t 1 .i� i �. I. �� ''iy i • - t. , .� .rs Rw•y I Evans Gcek - Lake - a P Fer.Y�rsM rl.. MII`ey ..0 - - FM' . OR - , SN IOU MIE ,� _r, -',. -. \ . I ..i`` !d�.a�a •I .� .. North Fak ii.:.�t ^�� .. • "TILE' --_� `p 6� ,; - - - SnoQualmla Rive .. - ' • 1 r I .. in Creek Lake ,n id .:BASINf �' . -,.. . .... „1.• a IN ck ',..'i, "` � yr —� - - RIVER ... r ►erte -s r� f a- ,FauL.al '� ,`� .. 1 . ,, : i, 7 , -- ._. e' ; . 1) .) ., __ , __ _ . pud Er . ., - , -:.:.p.k, ..--.....„-) . i i,...._, / .10,....s. , ,_!..._ 4 .. r ,__ I. .. � K'.0 1>\_$waer w Rive e t `` ,.:,BASIN _ .j �' • Oa, a"' E s - S'wpualmie River •-•-i .. /- - •, _ _ Ra,irg River ....- - " . 141. i Needle- Fall • eel '�:!L t, ' Geek. _- _ i [O N • :s - •, Park ,_., , ._____N__, L,., _,... : lill' i:,.' ... \''' ,,,, ,_.; ,,. _s. ,_ -,. .• . n,- • axle Creek i _roc Y :~. L i �"E• ! ___. - - - F 0... ` r Y'„'�•;«., ' , = -.::_..Pk__ Los Mores . _ - -• __. R tit 41 4i• ii, .—_ v �I - + .. R., _ ___...._. .....,„........ i_. , . V r .,, 00c. -, .11A1A" "7, 'v. ---;10.coo 4 - pRA1_ NIAGE r' �� River , �. ._ DRAINAGE BASINS 7 .. \ SITV OF SE<TT�wgTERSIQO � �ti' .Green ,..4Ft'r * I�/e '•\ �sw , =..:a. r.; - f caveman *Ili ;, �t -��,iv `77 . i` King County -- • 1987 aIi • r \ I'—\ MiOtlie ;�. Major Basin Boundary r _ i _>_.. CoH.GeeA _ ee G . • j River. • Sub-Basin Boundary • 1Mi-iii E s NRw„�, ., Source: King County Basin Reconnaissance Program a t CITY OF INCOMn WATERSHED �, .. . \RIV • WMte River •4: ER • ,,... BASIN ,. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Miles ___ ___Y BLACK RIVER BASIN Rentci r,' i 1 Basin Boundary -- ,I Subcatchment Boundary Jlisk-41""( OOCollection Point Stream % r ii,' °o 0006 TributaryNumber _ \ '" T�k< <. .0301 Proposed Project ,� ���'` �+ I o 000s ike NZ ) r. (I) 0006A I [Jo, • • •'— // t.r �„0 ° •• 1' . _ o0 11,111•‘ ;- 3 July,1987 0 i��i 4► / p)111111:( 30 UV AI 0 Si 2 oi 3 • r 0012 -4 ilT 03„:.,1 ,,,,0 D. •S Res traces till ,k.►, 0 it ., i - o _ _,_,.— 7/,,. . NS ^s t :« I. Keili j t • / • 1 r die I s ii . I, `� • i 0 •7 / ' 1 i ._.,; ... _-_ _ i' . - i .1 :., i 'Ir. __.... - • i' 1i 1 RECONNAISSANCE REPORT NO. 14 BLACK RIVER BASIN JUNE 1987 Natural Resources and Parks Division and Surface Water Management Division King County, Washington • P:BR.TOG/mlm King County Executive Tim Hill King County Council Audrey Gruger, District 1 Cynthia Sullivan, District 2 Bill Reams, District 3 Lois North, District 4 Ron Sims, District 5 Bruce Laing, District 6 Paul Barden, District 7 Bob Grieve, District 8 Gary Grant, District 9 Department of Public Works Parks, Planning and Resources Don LaBelle, Director Joe Nagel, Director Surface Water Management Division Natural Resources and Parks Division Joseph J. Simmler, Division Manager Russ Cahill, Division Manager Jim Kramer, Assistant Division Manager Bill Jolly, Acting Division Manager Dave Clark, Manager, River & Water Derek Poon, Chief. Resources Planning Section Resource Section Bill Eckel, Manager, Basin Planning Program Larry Gibbons, Manager, Project Management and Design Section Contributing Staff Contributing Staff Doug Chin, Sr. Engineer Ray Heller, Project Manager & Team Leader Randall Parsons, Sr. Engineer Matthew Clark, Project Manager Andy Levesque, Sr. Engineer Robert R. Fuerstenberg, Biologist & Team Leader Bruce Barker, Engineer Matthew J. Bruengo, Geologist Arny Stonkus, Engineer Lee Benda, Geologist Ray Steiger, Engineer Derek Booth, Geologist Pete Ringen, Engineer Dyanne Sheldon, Wetlands Biologist Cindy Baker, Earth Scientist Di Johnson, Planning Support Technician Robert Radek, Planning Support Technician Randal Bays, Planning Support Technician Fred Bentler, Planning Support Technician Consulting Staff Mark Hudson, Planning Support Technician Sharon Clausen, Planning Support Technician Don Spencer, Associate Geologist, Earth David Truax, Planning Support Technician Consultants, Inc. Brian Vanderburg, Planning Support Technician John Bethel, Soil Scientist, Earth Carolyn M. Byerly, Technical Writer Consultants, Inc. Susanna Hornig, Technical Writer Virginia Newman, Graphic Artist Marcia McNulty, Typesetter Mildred Miller, Typesetter Jaki Reed. Typesetter Lela Lira, Office Technician Marty Cox, Office Technician P:CR TABLE OF CONTENTS I. SUMMARY 1 II. INTRODUCTION 1 III. FINDINGS IN BLACK RIVER BASIN 2 A. Overview _ 2 B. Effects of Urbanization 4 C. Specific Problems 5 IV. RECOMMENDATIONS 7 A. Expand existing and/or construct additional R/D facilities 7 B. Preserve wetlands on plateau to provide natural storage 7 C. Protect steep valley walls from .erosion and landslides 7 D. Reduce sedimentation in streams along valley floor 7 E. Enforce prohibitions against dumping domestic trash 7 F. Increase the overall effectiveness of surface water management 8 V. MAP 9 APPENDICES APPENDIX A: . Estimated Costs A-1 APPENDIX B: Capital Improvement Projects Rating List B-1 APPENDIX C: Detailed Findings and Recommendations C-1 P:BR.TOC/mIm SUMMARY Black River Basin, located in south King County, is named for a river that ceased to exist in 1917. after major alterations to river systems were made to build the Lake Washington ship canal. The reconnaissance was conducted along the streams and tributaries still remaining in this basin. Development in the basin in and around the cities of Kent, Renton, and Tukwila has produced extensive areas of impervious surface, which are expected to double by the time the basin reaches its development capacity. Storm runoff from impervious surfaces is drained through pipes and discharges in some cases directly into the stream system. Field investigation of problems in the Black River Basin revealed that volumes and rates of stormwater flows have contributed to serious acceleration of erosion of streambanks and lower slopes and have produced downcutting and landslides in some places. Sedimentation resulting from these processes has, in turn, clogged existing conveyance systems, rendering many of them ineffective, and destroyed fish habitat for spawning, rearing, and migrating. In addition, the general inefficiency of the basin drainage system has increased the potential for flooding. Another problem cited was visibly poor water quality resulting from large amounts of domestic trash placed in streambeds and from commercial/industrial runoff, particularly near the Longacres Racetrack in Renton. Recommendations for action in the Black River Basin include: 1) expanding R/D facilities and preserving wetlands to assure adequate stormwater storage, 2) taking measures to protect steep valley walls from erosion and landslides, 3) reducing sedimentation on the valley floor with sediment traps, 4) increasing enforcement of regulations against the dumping of trash into streams, and 5) increasing the overall effectiveness of surface water management in the basin through doing more maintenance of facilities, continuing intergovernmental agreements, lowering volumes and rates of release for stormwater, and other measures. II. INTRODUCTION: History and Goals of the Program In 1985 the King County Council approved funding for the Planning Division (now called the Natural Resources and Parks Division), in coordination with the Surface Water Management Division, to conduct a reconnaissance of 29 major drainage basins located in King County. The effort began with an initial investigation of three basins -- Evans, Soos, and Hylebos Creeks -- in order to determine existing and potential surface water problems and to recom- mend action to mitigate and prevent these problems. These initial investigations used available data and new field observations to examine geology, hydrology and habitat conditions in each basin. Findings from these three basins led the King County Council to adopt Resolution 6018 in April 1986, calling for reconnaissance to be completed on the remaining 26 basins. The Basin Reconnaissance Program, which was subsequently established, is now an important ele- ment of surface water management. The goals of the program are to provide useful data with regard to 1) critical problems needing immediate solutions, 2) basin characteristics for use in the preparation of detailed basin management plans, and 3) capital costs associated with the early resolution of drainage problems. The reconnaissance reports are intended to provide an evaluation of present drainage con- ditions in the County in order to transmit information to policymakers to aid them in deve- loping more detailed regulatory measures and specific capital improvement plans. They are not intended to ascribe in any conclusive manner the causes of drainage or erosion problems; instead, they are to be used as initial surveys from which choices for subsequent detailed engineering and other professional environmental analyses may be made. Due to the limited amount of time available for the field work in each basin, the reports must be viewed as P:BR/jr 1 Black River Basin (continued) descriptive environmental narratives rather than as final engineering conclusions. Recommendations contained in each report provide a description of potential mitigative measures for each particular basin; these measures might provide maximum environmental protection through capital project construction or development approval conditions. The appropriate extent of such measures will be decided on a case-by-case basis by County offi- cials responsible for reviewing applications for permit approvals and for choosing among com- peting projects for public construction. Nothing in the reports is intended to substitute for a more thorough environmental and engineering analysis possible on a site-specific basis for any proposal. M. FINDINGS IN BLACK RIVER BASIN The field reconnaissance in Black River Basin was conducted in February 1987 by Ray Heller, resource planner, Ray Steiger and Doug Chin, engineers; and Matthew .I.--Brunengo, geologist. Their findings and recommendations are presented here. A. Overview of Black River Basin Geographic and land use features. Black River Basin is generally bounded on the north by the cities of Renton and Tukwila and on the south by the city of Kent. The western and eastern boundaries are formed by the Green River and 116th Avenue SE, -respectively, in this southern King County—basin. The Black River, which gives its name to this basin, actually ceased to exist in 1917, when the Lake Washington ship canal was built and the level of Lake Washington was lowered, cutting off flow to the Black River. The 28-square-mile basin investigated by this field team includes what remains of the network of tributaries that formerly connected with the Black River. The Black River Basin is split nearly equally into an eastern upland plateau and a western floodplain in the Lower Green River Valley along State Road (SR) 167. The floodplain is almost wholly contained within the cities of Tukwila, Renton, and Kent, where extensive development in the last two decades has changed the landscape from a rural farming area to a commercial and industrial one. While open space and farming still exist here, the area will be infilled, primarily by a combination of commercial, industrial, and some multi-family complexes, by the year 2000. The King County Comprehensive Plan shows that the upland area will be developed at urban densities. This transition is already in progress, with commercial developments emerging along the Kent-Kangley Highway (SR 516), the Benson Highway (SR 515), and the Carr Road-176th Street SE-Petrovitsky Road corridor. Multi-family land use occurs in the uplands also and surrounds commercial developments. New single-family units are being built throughout most of the eastern upland portion of the basin. The amount of impervious surface is expected to nearly double between 1985 and the time the basin is fully developed. This will require strict controls on surface water discharge to assure prevention of further degradation of the stream system, which has already begun to exhibit adverse environmental impacts resulting from urbanization. Other factors of concern in this basin are those sensitive areas occupied by wetlands, streams, floodplains, coal-mine zones, and landslide zones. Mostly located in the eastern portion of the basin, these areas have already been damaged by the effects of develop- P:BR/jr 2 Black River Basin (continued) ment. Details of the damage, along with suggestions for mitigation, are contained in later section of this report. Dominant geologic and geomorphic features. Black River Basin consists of the part of the Duwamish Valley east of the Green River and the western edge of the Covington drift plain, a plateau underlain by glacial deposits. Small creeks, which flow across its rolling surface, have eroded deep, narrow ravines up to 1.5 miles into the plateau. Downcutting is migrating headward in the upper reaches, and erosion of banks and lower slopes causes landsliding in the canyon walls, most of which are naturally unstable. Both of these processes are accelerated by increased flows -attributable to urbanization. Sediment is deposited where the streams flow onto the valley floor. The surface of the Covington drift plain is dominantly basal till, mantled in places with recessional outwash or deposits of post-glacial lakes. Near the edge of the plateau are several lenses of sediment deposited adjacent to a glacier lobe in—the Duwamish Valley. Older sediments are exposed in the ravines and bluffs. In the north, unconsolidated sediments lap up onto the southern limb of the Newcastle anticline; sedimentary and volcanic rocks crop out in the bluffs north of Panther Creek and form the Renton, Talbot, and Earlington Hills in the northern end of the valley toward Tukwila. Coal was mined from this area from 1853 until the 1940s. The Duwamish Valley is part of a trough carved into the drift plain during the last glaciation; it later became an arm of Puget Sound. A catastrophic mudflow originating on Mount Rainier approximately 5700 years ago dumped massive amounts of debris into the trough. This and other events, plus the deposition of alluvial sediment, expelled the salt water. Through the nineteenth century, the combined White and Green Rivers meandered through the valley. Near Renton, the Cedar River flowed into the Black which drained Lake Washington and flowed into the Duwamish. Beginning in 1906 a series of changes was made to these river systems. The Cedar River was diverted into Lake Washington, and the White River was diverted south to the Puyallup. The Black River itself ceased to exist. Geomorphic processes in the Black River Basin are most active on the western edge of the plateau. Lakes and wetlands formed here in the poorly drained swales. Where conditions of drainage and percolation are appropriate, small streams flow between the drumlins, eroding deep ravines into the unconsolidated sediments in the process. Over time, the ravines have been widened by mass-wasting of their walls (a process aided by groundwater) and erosion by tributary creeks; their upper ends have migrated their upstream into the plateau. Sediment carried by these streams was deposited in the Duwamish trough; after the trough became an alluvial valley, small fans formed on its edge. Hydrologic and hydraulic features. There are three distinct geographic features asso- ciated with the hydraulics of Black River Basin: the plateau east of the Lower Green River Valley, the steep (5-35°) erosive hillsides, and the flat floodplain of the valley floor. Mill, Garrison. Springbrook, and Panther Creeks, as well as three small, unnamed tri- butaries (0023, 0006B, and 0006C), all originate from locations on top of the plateau. Panther Creek originates from Panther Lake and the surrounding wetlands. The P:BR/jr 3 Black River Basin (continued) ii remaining tributaries originate primarily from surface water stored in natural depressions and wetland areas along the top of the hill. The surface water is collected and routed generally north and west via natural swales, open roadside ditches culverts,p I erts, and pipelines within street rights-of-way and, finally, down the steep hillsides to the valley floor. Mill Creek, located at the southernmost end of the Black River Basin, flows north between the Green River and SR 167 and then crosses under the highway at various locations. Mill, Springbrook, and Garrison Creeks continue P o � north along the west side of SR 167 and eventually combine as Springbrook Creek before being pumped into the Green River through King County's-Black River pump station. Tributaries 0006B and 0006C flow north independently down the hillside adjacent to Interstate 405 and into Renton, where they enter the city's storm drain system. Habitat characteristics. The use of natural streams for urban stormwater conduits has had a detrimental effect on most stream systems in the Black River Basin. Increased stormwater release rates that are higher than streams can convey without problems have resulted in extensive erosion, sedimentation, and landslides. Water quality problems caused bydomesticgarbage placed in streams andpoint discharges of pollutants are additional factors. What is striking about this basin is that these habitat problems exist everywhere. While some problems are worse than others, their impact on the fish habitat of each stream examined was profound. No fish were observed in any streams during the investigation. For this reason it is surprising that the fish counter at the Black River pump plant located on Monster Road (through which all water in the basin is discharged into the Green River recorded 84 fish entering the stream system in 1986. While this figure is higher than that for fish counts in the previous five years, it is significantly lower than historical levels or the potential levels that might be achieved if streams were in better condition for spawning. The current habitat conditions offer little hope for the future of these salmon runs. To reach spawning areas fish must first pass through an open flood-control drainage ditch for a minimum of five miles. This ditch has no vegetation or pool protection for fish to take refuge against predators or water-temperature increases. In addition, water quality is visibly poor. The eggs of fish that do reach spawning territory are likely to be smothered with sediment or washed out during heavy rainstorms. If these problems associated with development worsen, stream systems will probably be left biologically sterile. Reversing this pattern of degradation is dependent on revising the policies and priorities in the planning and zoning activities, the develop- ment review processes on the Surface Water Management programs of King County, Renton, Tukwila, and Kent. B. Effects of Urbanization in the Basin The existing upper reaches of the Black River Basin were once heavily vegetated, and natural depressions retained much of the surface water. Water was released slowly then, and the stream systems could convey flows easily. Development has brought about the removal of this vegetative cover and filling of the natural depressions. Many streams are now being piped. Impervious surfaces are increasing and will eventually account for 50 percent of the basin's surface area. In general, surface water is entering natural systems at a faster and higher rate than before development accelerated two decades ago. Ii P:BR/jr 4 Black River Basin (continued) • Earlier discussions pointed out the serious effects this is producing in the form of ero- sion and sediment transport to lower stream reaches. Additionally, sedimentation decreases the efficiency of the entire basin drainage system by filling culverts and chan- nels. This in turn increases the potential for flooding. The city of Kent removes an estimated 1,100 cubic yards of sediment annually from its sediment facility at Mill Creek Park. The Washington State Department of Transportation also employs a regular cleaning schedule to remove gravel and sediment from its culvert under South 212th Street on Tributary 0023. Sediment from Springbrook Creek has been transported downstream from the erosive hillside to a pri- vate trout farm west of Talbot Road and rendered it inoperative. Similar examples occur throughout the basin along the bottom of the steep hillside and east of State Road 167. Erosion is further accelerated by drainage outlets from developments and public areas. Discharge from a pipe into Garrison Creek adjacent to Benson Road freefalls for approximately 10 feet before scouring the ravine it enters. Similar erosion occurs on Tributary 0006B where water is discharged from the Fred Nelson Junior High School across Benson Road to the top of a severely eroded ravine. An onsite detention facility downstream at the Victoria Hills housing development accumulates large amounts of sediment. Its capacity is decreasing, and the function of the facility is threatened. The development trends in this basin mean that land for regional R/D facilities will become more difficult to obtain at the same time that erosion and potential for flooding are increasing. Additional problems may arise if existing onsite R/D systems malfunction from improper design or construction or from lack of maintenance. An onsite facility for a privately developed trailer park, located west of the Benson Road adjacent to Garrison Creek, exemplifies the potential hazard. Unstable fill was placed on the steep ravine and an R/D pond built on its edge. The fill becomes saturated when the pond is in use, and tension cracks in the fill along the slope indicate potential failure. Such an event would add large amounts of sediment to the drainage system. Development may create similar problems elsewhere if the proper design, construction, inspection, and maintenance of R/D facilities is neglected. C. Specific Problems Identified Black River Basin exhibits serious problems throughout its system, with exceptions only in the south fork of Springbrook Creek and on Panther Creek in subcatchment 10. The most significant problems noted by the field team during its investigation are listed below. 1. Stream channel erosion accelerated by the muting of runoff from developed areas into streams. Major problems exist in the ravines, where streams are cutting into till at the upper ends of canyons and associated landsliding and surface erosion occur (see section 3 below). Although these processes have been taking place naturally for a long time, increased runoff from developing areas on the plateau is causing acceleration of the erosion. a. The worst cases of erosion observed include those on Mill Creek (0005). P:BR/jr 5 Black River Basin (continued) Garrison Creek (0022) and its tributaries (0023, 0024, and 0025), the north fork of Springbrook Creek (0021), and Panther Creek (0006). b. Prominent examples of gullying at drainage-structure outfalls are in Mill Creek (0005), Springbrook Creek (0021), Panther Creek (0006), and below Benson Road on both Garrison Creek (0022) and Talbot Creek (0006B). c. Examples of accelerated downcutting resulting from increased runoff from developing areas are located in Talbot Creek and two small streams (0064A and 0006C) in Renton. . _ 2. Landstding associated with stream erosion in ravines, as a result of steep slopes and saturated soils. Instability generally takes the form of rotational failures or debris slides triggered by stream undercutting. In many cases, natural instability is exacerbated by filling and/or by construction on canyon walls;-for example, a new fill above Garrison Creek at Benson Road is failing, and old fills are being under- cut. All of the ravines should be considered landslide-hazard areas. The same is true of the bluffs at the western edge of the plateau, even though there have not been many problems yet. These are moderate to steep, landslide-susceptible slo- pes, especially in the northern (Renton) and southern (Kent) ends of the basin -- the area under the most development pressure. 3. Damage to (or destruction of) habitat due to: a. High flows and high velocities, which remove macrophytes and benthic orga- nisms, plants, insects, and possibly fish. Visible evidence of high velocities was noted on all the streams in this basin except the south fork of Springbrook Creek. b. Sedimentation from excessive erosion, which is filling pools, choking spawning gravels, and in some cases filling stream beds to the point of making channels impassible to fish. All of the four big stream systems in Black River Basin exhibit this problem. The Kent parks department annually removes 1,100 cubic yards of material from Mill Creek. A large sediment flow has filled the Springbrook Creek stream channel to a depth of approximately 5 feet, and Panther Creek just north of Valley General Hospital has a large alluvial fan. c. Visibly poor water quality: 1) Large amounts of domestic trash have been deposited in these stream canyons. Mill Creek has become a dump for appliances at river mile 9.60, and Garrison Creek appears to be more of a landfill than a creek at 1.30. Such practices have a detrimental effect on water quality as well as the visual quality of the environment. 2) Commercial and industrial enterprises are producing runoff that causes many streams to be oily, turbid, and sudsy. Springbrook Creek (Trib. 0005 at RM 1.30). flowing under the bridge of Southwest 16th Street just east of Longacres in Renton, is one of the worst examples noted. The Western Processing facility just upstream has been identified as a source of toxic wastes entering both surface and groundwater systems. P:BR/jr 6 Black River Basin (continued) IV. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ACTION Habitat, erosion, landsliding, and flooding problems in the Black River Basin can be addressed by the measures identified below. Most of the solutions listed here will mitigate specific problems observed during field investigation or will prevent similar problems in the future. However, additional recommendations have been included to suggest administrative or regulatory measures that would increase the overall effectiveness of surface- water management in this basin. A. Expand existing and/or construct additional regional R/D facilities on the plateau in order to control storm flows that originate there. Site facilities upstream of the four large creek ravines that are experiencing the worst damage. Facilities should be regional in scope and should follow the general specifi- cations outlined in Appendix A of this report. These will impede-the direct conveyance of runoff into the steep, naturally erosive ravines, thereby reducing erosion rates that result in sediment transport and slope instability and that damage habitat. B. Preserve wetlands on the plateau to provide natural storage. In addition, reconsider Panther Lake for use as a regional R/D site. Although the lake has been classified as a #1-C wetland, the amount of storage it offers is substantial with a moderate addi- tional (.25-to .50-foot) fluctuation in depth. - C. Protect steep valley walls from erosion and landslides caused from direct discharges of stormwater: 1. Tightline discharges or provide other appropriate nonerosive conveyance over steep hillsides; provide energy dissipation at the outfalls. This has already been done at several points on Mill Creek (Tributary 0005) with good results. 2. Consider rerouting flow in cases where tightlining or other methods are not feasible. For example, runoff from the area southeast of Springbrook Creek might be piped down Southeast 200th Street rather than routed into the north fork (0021) as it is now. 3. Lower the potential for landslides by restricting development in and along the tops of ravines. In particular, strongly discourage filling along the edges; the fill at Benson Road above Garrison Creek (0022) will probably have to be removed. D. Reduce sedimentation in streams along the valley floor in cases where sedimentation is not adequately prevented by R/D and other upstream measures. In extreme cases (probably including Panther Creek [0006]), construct sediment traps (with convenient access for removal of accumulated material) at points where streams flow onto the valley floor. E Increase enforcement of regulations against the dumping of domestic trash into ravines and stream channels. The Seattle-King County Health Department and the King County office of Building and Land Development should be asked to investigate this ongoing problem and to take appropriate action when violators are identified. P:BR/jr 7 Black River Basin (continued) F. Increase the overall effectiveness of surface water management in the Black River Basin: 1. Continue cooperative intergovernmental arrangements between the cities of Tukwila, Kent, and Renton; the Washington State Department of Transportation; and the King County Surface Water Management Division to identify and propose solutions to habitat and hydraulic problems in the basin. These efforts should include de- veloping cost-sharing agreements where capital improvements are required. 2. Evaluate and reduce, if appropriate, the volumes and rates of release for stormwater originating from developments. Present release rates and volumes are causing erosion, sedimentation and habitat problems. 3. Increase the maintenance and inspection of existing King County and city drainage systems to ensure that they are functioning properly. 4. Encourage public participation in maintaining water quality and in stormwater management in the basin, including citizen action projects to clean trash from streams and education about citizens role in maintaining clean water and stream systems. 5. Perform more detailed and comprehensive hydrologic/hydraulic analysis of all drainage systems within the basin to determine how the existing facilities will function under existing and future flows. 6. Prepare a comprehensive basin plan with participation by all agencies concerned with surface water management in the basin. The plan should assess the econo- mic, hydrologic, and habitat impact of individual projects on a basin-wide scale. P:BR/jr 8 APPENDIX A ESTIMATED COST: PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROTECTS BLACK RIVER BASIN * Indicates project was identified by Surface Water Management office prior to reconnaissance. NOTE: All projects are located on map included in this report. Project Collect. Estimated Costs Number Point Project Description Problem Addressed and Comments 0301* 10 Increase R/D capacity of Panther Reduce erosion and flooding p $345,000 Lake by constructing earthen downstream in Panther (Panther Lake is #1 berms and outlet control Creek. Wetland and will require structure. Trib. 0006, RM 3.40. agreement to use as R/D site. Further biological study also needed at time of basin planning.) 0302' 22 Provide regional R/D facility by Prevent erosion to sensitive $208,000 constructing earthen dam across slopes downstream of (Project costs should drainage swale. Provide control proposed site by be shared with City structure and overflow spillway on reducing peak flows. of Renton.) Trib. 0021 at RM .40 (Springbrook I Creek). 0303* 29 Construct instream R/D facility at Reduce erosion and flooding of $125,000 point where Benson Rd. crosses of Garrison Creek by reducing (Project should be Garrison Creek. Reinforce peak flows. constructed in conjunction Benson Rd. Construct outlet-control with proposed Projects structure around existing cross 0304 and 0305.) culvert R.M. 1.40. P.BR.APA/mlm A-1 Project Collect. Estimated Costs Number Point Project Description Problem Addressed and Comments 0304* 28 Construct instream R/D facility in Reduce erosion and flooding of $151,000 Garrison Creek. Construct dam across Garrison Creek by reducing peak (Wash. State Dept. of existing ravine with outlet control flows. Transportation has cost- structure and overflow spillway. sharing agreement with King Provide for fish passage. (Trib. F County and the city of Kent. 0022, RM 1.0.) Coordinate with Projects 0303 and 0305.) 0305* 30 Construct RID facility. Install Reduce erosion and flooding $116,000 proportional discharge outlet downstream in Garrison Creek (Construct in conjunction and overflow spillway. Excavate by reducing peak flows. with Projects 0303 and 0304.) to existing streambed level and provide earthen berms around site. (Trib. 0024 at RM .30.) 0307* 19 Construct regional R/D facility in Reduce erosion in Mill Creek and $309,000 Mill Creek Wetland 8 (rated #2). prevent downstream flooding. Construct berms around north and west sides to increase existing capacity, and provide an outlet control struc- ture. Enhance downstream conveyance capacity and stabilize channel with dense native vegetation. Provide habi- tat enhancement to maintain existing wetland values. 0309 27 Construct an instream R/D facility Will reduce flows that $26,000 in sewer line right-of-way adjacent cause severe erosion to (Dependent on the availability to SE 208th St. (Trib. 0023 at unstable downstream ravine. of right-of-way for R/D. Addi- RM 1.00.) tional cost will result if sewer-line relocation is required.) P.BR.APA/mIm A-2 APPENDIX B CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT RANKING BLACK RIVER BASIN Prior to the Black River Basin field reconnaissance, seven projects had been identified and rated using the CIP selection criteria developed by the Surface Water Management (SWM) and Natural Resources and Parks Divisions. Following the reconnaissance, seven projects remain proposed for this area. They include one new, previously unidentified and unrated project. This displaces one previously selected project, which was eliminated based on the consensus of the reconnaissance team because no problem was apparent in the field. The previous SWM capital improvement project list for the Black River Basin had an estimated cost of $1,250,000, while the revised list increases to an estimated cost of $1,280,000. This 2.4 percent increase in estimated capital costs is due mainly to upward revised cost figures for securing or acquiring easements over wetlands and costs associated with a new project to solve a previously uni- dentified problem. The following table summarizes the scores and costs for the CIPs proposed for the Black River Basin. These projects were rated according to previously established SWM Program Citizen Advisory Committee criteria. The projects ranked below are those for which the first rating question, ELEMENT 1: "GO/NO GO," could be answered affirmatively. These projects can be considered now for merging into the "live" CIP list. RANK PROJECT NO. SCORE COST 1 0302* 125 $ 208,000 2 0303* 110 125,000 3 0309 100 26,000 4 0301* 95 345,000 5 0305* 90 116,000 6 0307* 60 309,000 7 0304* 55 151,000 TOTAL $1,280,000 * Indicates project was identified by the Surface Water Management Division prior to reconnaissance. P:BR.APB. B-1 APPENDIX C DETAILED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS BLACK RIVER BASIN `' All items listed here are Incased on final display maps in the offices of Surface Water Management, Building and Land Development, and Basin Planning. Trib. & Collect. Existing Anticipated Item* River Mile Point Category Prop. Proj. Conditions and Problems Conditions and Problems Recommendations 1 0005 3 Habitat Fish ladder through pump Based on the condition of Develop and implement a comprehensive RM .30 plant. Automatic counter the basin habitat and future Black River basin plan in agreement records all returning development, these numbers with all local jurisdictions. anadromous species will probably decrease. Habitat improvement would be one goal (apx. 84 in 1986). of this plan. 2 0005 12, 6 I-Iabitat Drainage district has Condition will continue. - Contact drainage district about RM 1.30- removed all stream cover the feasibility of select plant- 4.65 along drainage channel. ings along the ditch levees. Water quality looks very - Develop a plan to address point poor. Some oil and suds on and nonpoint water quality surface, also very turbid problems originating from the water. thousands of acres of commercial and industrial land in the basin. 3 0005 18 Habitat Large amounts of sediment More erosion, sedimentation, - Increase size and number of R/D RM 8.30- moving down the stream and loss of fish habitat. facilities upstream to reduce 8.70 system has filled in flow volume and rates to non- all the pools. Kent removes erosive levels. 1,100 cubic yards of sedi- ment from Mill Creek at Canyon Park annually. P:BR.APC/mlm C-1 Trit. __ Collect. Existing Anticipated item River Mile Point Cateoory Prop. Prot Conditions and Problems Conditions and Problems Recommendations 4 0005 18 Geology Erosion in narrow, steep- Increased flows from tribu- - Increase control of stormflow in RM 8.50- sided ravine -- intermit- taries on plateau will cause streams originating on the plateau 9.70 tent bank erosion, slump- continued or accelerated (especially Trib. 0005). ing; gullies below cul- erosion. Flow directed over - Direct local drainage (below RM verts; downcutting near the edge of the ravine 9.80) around the ravine, or tight- upper end. Deposition at causes gullying of walls. line to bottom of ravine. mouth of ravine. Erosion of banks and lower - Remove or repair old dam. slopes causes accelerated - Restict any further development on landsliding in lower slopes the edge of the ravine. (e.g., around old dam at RM 9.40). 5 0005 18 Habitat Left bank has lots of gar- Potential water quality - Remove garbage (preferably by the RM 9.10- bage deposited from access problem; since inside Mill parties who placed it there). 9•20 road above. Right bank Creek Canyon park, it could - Increase enforcement of regulations is a major dumping ground be a public hazard, prohibiting the random dumping of of used appliances. garbage in non-approved disposal sites. 6 0005 18 Habitat 12" culvert discharges onto If not tightlined in a safe, Kent Surface Water Utility should RM 9.40 top of left bank and has nonerosive manner to the put this tightlining project on caused landslide into the bottom of the ravine, more their list of future CIP projects. stream. erosion will occur with resulting sedimentation downstream. 7 0005 18 Habitat Good spawning gravels. Without increased rate and - SWM/Basin Planning should deter- RM 9.60 Protection from high storm velocity and volume controls, mine the allowable rates and velo- flows and velocities new development,will cities to maintain a stable, needed. Most large organic further threaten this nonerosive channel. New devel- debris flushed out of the spawning area. opment must then be conditioned to ravine. meet these requirements. - Add structures or large organic debris to create pools. r P:BR.APC/mlm C-2 Trib. & Collect. Existing Anticipated Item River Mile Point Categow Prop. Proj. Conditions and Problems Conditions and Problems Recommendations 8 0005 19 Habitat Fish blockage due to con- Condition will continue. Encourage State Fisheries person- RM 10.05 crete and asphalt debris nel to organize a citizen-action piled in stream. project to construct a stepped pool or other solution to allow fish passage. 9 0005 19 Habitat Native vegetation Livestock will erode stream- - Fence to provide a stream corri- RM 10.10- removed down to stream edge bank and defecate in stream dor. 10.30 and replaced by pasture. channel. This will result - Plant native plants or allow in erosion, sedimentation, natural revegetation along and water quality problems. streambanks. 10 0005A 19 Hydrology 0307 Tributary contributes to This area will continue to - Obtain required easements and RM 0.2 Mill Creek, which experien- develop and will contribute construct a regional R/D facility ces erosion and sediment greater runoff to the in wetland area. transport. Wetland 0308 downstream conveyance system. - Construct berms along the western now provides some RID and The wetland area may be and northern sides of the existing has much more potential damaged by development wetland. capacity. around the perimeter and this - Increase the storage capacity may decrease the ability of of the wetland by excavation. the surface water to infiltrate. Runoff will continue to increase and erosion and sedimentation will likewise continue. 11 0006 7 Ilabitat Stream flows throuth wet- Condition will continue. If anadromous fish were rein- RM .50- land. No visible channel. 1.40 I traduced to Panther Creek, Fish transit through this wetland passage would need to be cattail wetland looks assured. A biological assessment difficult. by fisheries and wetland biolo- gists would be needed to formulate a viable solution. P:BR.APC/mIm C-3 Trib_ __ Collect. Existing Anticipated Item River Mile Point Category Prop. Proj. Conditions and Problems Conditions and Problems Recommendations r 12 0006 8, 10 Geology Channel downcutting at Problem will get much worse - Provide additional R/D facilities RM 1.40- upper end; bank erosion and as development proceeds in upper basin. 2.60 mass-wasting. Deposition along the ravine and in the - Restrict development along ravine above 180th and at wet- upper basin. Ravine is edges. land below Talbot Rd. sensitive to high flows in - Route runoff around ravine or channel, and slopes are tightline it to bottom in a safe, susceptible to gullying. nonerosive manner (gully at Sediment is filling a major RM 2.50). wetland. 13 0006 7 Habitat Alluvial fan from upstream Killing of trees from sedi- Provide a sediment pond and increased RM 1.50 erosion; landslides filling ment inundation. Little or maintenance or reduce flows upstream wetland and blocking no fish passage. to nonerosive levels. stream for fish use. 14 0006 8 Habitat 3' drop out of culvert Condition will remain. Improve system only if a fisheries RM 1.70 under Talbot Rd with biologist deems the Panther Creek no pool. Potential fish system viable for fish. barriers. 15 0006 8 Habitat Two debris jams pose Condition will remain. Remove debris or improve passage RM 1.75 potential fish barriers. through the debris jams. 16 0006 10 Habitat Extensive bank erosion, Worsening of current condi- Same as Trib. 0006, RM 2.55-3.00. RM 1.80- channel downcutting and tions. (See Item 19 below.) 2.55 sedimentation has elimi- nated most pools, fish, and benthic organisms. Both large organic debris 1 and bedload material are active. , 17 0006 8 Ilabitat 12' waterfall and concrete No future fish access to If the upstream habitat justifies RM 1.95 channel creating fish upstream areas. improvement, then a fish ladder should barrier. be constructed over the falls. P:BR.APC/mlm C-4 Trib. & Collect. Existing Anticipated hem River Mile Point Category Prop. Pro'. Conditions and Problems Conditions and Problems Recommendations 18 0006 R Geology Large landslide (transla- Slide will continue to Direct surface runoff away from RM 2.15 tional and rotational contribute to sedimentation top of slope to gravel pit failure), with raw slope downstream. (to west). remaining; gullying of slope. Apparently caused by combination of under- cutting by stream and routing of road drainage over slope from above. 19 0006 10 Habitat Stream in good condition. Possible erosion and loss of - Maintain stream flows at non- RM 2.55- Setbacks and protective habitat if future develop- erosive levels 3.00 vegetation needed at points ment increases volume and - Maintain a natural stream corri- along the stream. Some rate of flow. dor from Panther Lake down into good pools and spawning and along Panther Creek. gravel in a few places. 20 0006 10 IIydrology 0301 Panther Lake is a #1-C Future development in this The sensitive nature of the RM 3.40 wetland that provides a area will triple the amount wetland would require precise large amount of natural of impervious area. The boundary surveys and control over storage; the downstream available area for regional the amount of water artificially system is in fair R/D facilities may soon be retained by the proposed control. condition with some exausted and the system Use Panther Lake as an R/D facili- erosion. The contributing will continue unchecked ty by constructing earthen berms drainage area is not downstream. Erosive " on the north and west sides of the currently densely devel- ' soils throughout the area wetland area; construct a control oped. are further threatened outlet, enhance and increase the as higher amounts of runoff capacity of the downstream channel will increase the rate at (stabilize with vegetation), and which the existing stream obtain easements. erodes. P:BR.APC/mlm C-S Trib_ __ Collect. Existing Anticipated Item River Mile Point Category Prop. Proj. Conditions and Problems Conditions and Problems Recommendations 21 0006A 7 habitat Incised stream eroded to Reduction of wetland area Consider tightlining stream from RM .10 bedrock above Talbot Rd. and values. Loss of flood Whitworth Ave. S to Talbot Rd. Little or no habitat value. storage. Two slides are depositing sediment in large wetland on east side of Valley Free- way (inside city of Renton). 22 0006A 7 Geology Erosion in short channel Stormflow is discharged rap- R/D and/or energy dissipation at RM .10-.20 reach below development: idly into channel from cul- upper end of channel needed. downcutting at upper end, vert below street. Down- failure of lower slopes cutting is prevented at • throughout. c lower end (by bedrock and culvert at Talbot Rd.) but will continue to undercut slopes at upper end. 23 0006B 4 Geology Extreme gullying below cul- Runoff from Benson Rd. and' Reroute some or all of the RM 1.55- vert outfall (below Benson area to the east is dis- runoff or tightline through the 1.70, 1.00 Rd.) causing rapid sedi- charged onto erodible sand erodible reach. (Problem area is mentation, especially and gravel, which is depos- slated for development.) in R/D pond (RM 1.55); ited downstream. Most of probably contributing to the coarse material is deposition at RM 1.00. caught by the R/D pond -- will require more frequent maintenance. 24 0006B 4 Habitat Drainage from Fred Nelson More property loss from - Provide R/D at Jr. High School. Jr. High School is causing unrestricted flown from Jr. - Other possibility is to pipe extensive erosion problems High. High maintenance the stream. between Benson Rd. and costs to dredge R/D ponds of SR 515. Large sediment silt. build up in S 22nd Ct. R/D pond at S Puget Dr. No fish habitat in this system. ' P:BR.APC/mIm C-6 Trib. & Collect. Existing Anticipated Item River Mile Point Catcgory Prop. Proj. Conditions and Problems Conditions and Problems Recommendations 25 0006C 5 Habitat Rolling Hills Creek exhib- Little change due to riprap None. its oil sheen on water in along stream to protect upper portion of the creek. sewer line that parallels Little or no fish habitat stream. (or potential) exists. 26 0009 9 Geology Bank and lower-slope erosion Flows in tributary will in- - R/D in upper basin. RM .00- in small tributary channel, crease; erosion will continue - Remove fill along stream. .15 especially behind construc- causing sedimentation down- tion equipment lot. stream and perhaps threaten stability of building. 27 0009 9 Habitat Lots of litter; stream has Worsening of water quality, - Reduce the volume and rate of water RM .15-.20 extensive downcutting, bank sedimentation, and erosion. to non-erosive levels by new R/D. erosion, and bedload - Consider restricting future develop- movement. merit (down-zone). - Community action projects could remove litter. 24 0020 12 Habitat Sediment has destroyed fish Possible flooding and sedi- Remove sedimentation source (see also RM .20 habitat. City of Kent mentation along S .192nd St. Trib. 0023, RM.95). removes sediment each year. 29 0020 21 Geology Bank erosion, landsliding Problems will continue. - Control storm flows. Increase R/D RM .50- in canyon due to outfalls above RM .40 in 0021; reroute or .70 at cnd of SE 196th St. and control flows from vicinity of SE from R/D on 200th plus 200th (tightline west on 200th). natural sensitivity - Provide energy dissipation at R/D (landslides). Heavy damage outfall (RM .40). in Jan. 86 storm. Sedi- - Restrict development on north side mentation above old road, of 0021 (runoff to be tightlined or and in trout farm below routed around ravine). Talbot Rd., as well as ero- sion in the ravine. P:BR.APC/mlm C-7 Trib « Collect Existing Anticipated Item River Mile Point Category Prop. Proj. Conditions and Problems Conditions and Problems Recommendations 30 0020 21 Ilabitat Excess sediment from Further sedimentation from Several options: construct sediment RM .60 upstream has destroyed a upstream sediment sources. pond above Talbot Road. Reduce private trout farm. flow rates and volumes in Trib. Thousands of fish were 0021. Increase R/D upstream of killed during Jan. '86 Talbot Rd. Down-zone land to storm. reduce surface water impacts of future development. 31 0021 22, Geology Bank erosion, landsliding Problems will continue. - Control storm flows: R/D above RM .00 in ravine due to outfalls RM .40 in 0021; reroute or 0.50 at end of SE 196th St. control flows from vicinity of and from R/D pond at SE SE 200th (tightline flows west 200th plus natural on 200th). sensitivity (landslides). - Provide energy dissipation at R/D Heavy damage in Jan. '86 outfall (RM .40). storm. Sedimentation above - Restrict development on north side old road and in trout farm of 0021 (runoff to be tightlined below Talbot Rd. (0020), as or routed around canyon). well as erosion in the canyon. 32 0021 22 Hydrology 0302 The upper reaches of Development will continue - Construct a regional R/D faci- RM .40 Springbrook Creek lie and impervious area will lity in the natural drainage within the city of Renton continue to grow. Increased swale at the upper reaches of City Watershed. The creek runoff will further erode this system. originates in highly ero- the unstable soils carrying - Construct a dam across the swale sive and steeply sloping sediment and debris with an outlet control structure soils. Alterations of the downstream, where they will and an overflow spillway. natural drainage patterns reduce the efficiency of or - Tightline existing drainage into by development, roadway even destroy culverts, pipe- area to further reduce erosion and construction, and poor lines, and streambeds. raise existing roadway to prevent practice in handling ` Flooding could result from flooding. runoff have increased ero- the inefficient facilities sion and sediment coupled with the greater transport to the lower runoff. r gradient downstream reaches. P:BR.APC/mlm C-8 Trib. & Collect. Existing Anticipated Item River Mile Point Category Prop. Proj. Conditions and Problems Conditions and Problems Recommendations 33 0022 26, 28 Geology Bank cutting and slope Natural instabilityof RM .20_ - Increase RID capacity, especially RM failure in canyon of canyon walls is aggravated upstream of Benson Road. 1.40Garrison Creek. Some ero- by increased flows from - Tightline flows to bottom of sion caused by outfall over upper part of catchment. canyon; provide energy dissipa- edges or flow out of tight- s tion. lined culverts impinging on - Restrict further development on opposite banks. Deposition edges of canyon. in vicinity of SE 218 St. 34 0022 26 Habitat Large sedimentation zone has Flooding of adjacent proper- Reduce flow rates and volumes RM .30- filled channel and pools. ties due to rising streambed to non-erosive levels. Then caused by sediment consider habitat improvements deposition. such as large organic debris for pools and instream protection. 35 0022 29,28 Habitat Surface water runoff is More development will exa- Reduce flow rates to nonerosive RM .30- 26 causing severe erosion and cerbate the problem. levels by providing more R/D. 2.30 sedimentation. Instream Stricter development controls by habitat for fish and benthic down-zoning development areas. organisms is very poor. Most pools are gone, in- stream large organic debris and bedload are both moving. 36 0022 28 Habitat Stream has a whitewashed, Worsening of existing Reduce stream flow rates and RM .80 sterile look due to the problems. volumes to non-erosive levels. water volume and veloci- Then consider habitat improve- ties. These have created , ments such as large organic debris a very unstable system for pools and instream protec- that has destroyed the tion. fish habitat and removed most fish, benthos, and macrophytes. P:BR.APC/mIm C-9 Trib. __ Collect. Existing Anticipated Item River Mile Point Category Prop. Proj. Conditions and Problems Conditions and Problems Recommendations 37 0022 28 Geology Erosion below culvert out- Gullying and failure of Tightline to bottom of canyon, RM 1.10 fall; downcutting of side- sideslopes will continue with energy dissipator. gully into loose sandy unless outfall is materials. These arc controlled. causing some slope failure in backyards. 38 0022 28 Habitat Large quantities of Water quality and visual Remove trash. RM 1.30 domestic trash instream. problems. 39 0022 24 Geology Mass failure of new fill on Problems will continue. - Fill should be rebuilt or RM 1.40 edge of canyon; erosion of removed. culvert outfall; under- - RID pond on edge should be cutting of slopes. Trash moved north. disposed of by nursery is - Culvert outfall should be entering stream. Fill was rerouted into a new R/D facility emplaced poorly is settling southeast of Benson Rd. (or toward creek; side is tightlined to bottom of hill). failing. Runoff from - Removal of trash from stream streets and development east should be required. of Benson Rd. is eroding slopes at outfall. 40 0022 26 Hydrology Garrison Creek experiences Additional development There are three recommended pro- (See items erosion and downcutting upstream and along jects along Garrison Creek #42-43 because of the step gra- s Garrison Creek will continue that would impede peak runoff below) dient and erosive soils in to exacerbate the erosion flows and would thus reduce ero- this reach. Development in problem and degrade the sion and flooding potential. the upstream areas has existing conveyance system. The system would need to be further accelerated this Sediment load and erosion hydraulically modelled to deter- problem by concentrating will reduce the efficiency of mine the individual/joint impact runoff into the stream. (and potentially destroy) of the recommended projects. existing facilities. Potential cost sharing should be reviewed with the Washington State Dept. of Transportation and the city of Kent. , P:BR.APC/mIm C-10 Trit.. « Collect. Existing Anticipated Item River Mile Point Category Prop. Proj. Conditions and Problems Conditions and Problems Recommendations 41 0022 29 Hydrology 0303 See Item 40. s See Item 40. Construct instream RID facility RM 1.40 at intersection of Benson Rd. and Garrison Creek. Roadway would be reinforced to act as impoundment. Construct outlet control structure and tie to existing cross culvert. Check realignment schedule with WSDOT. Provide fish passage. 42 0022 28 Hydrology 0304 See Item 40. See Item 40. Construct instream R/D facility RM 1.00 in Garrison Creek. Construct a dam across the ravine with an outlet control structure and an overflow spillway. Provide access road from SE 220th without increasing landslide potential. Project will provide fish passage. 43 0024 30 Hydrology 0305 See Item 40. See Item 40. Construct RID facility. Would require excavation of soil, remo- val of existing vegetation, and construction of berms. Facility would require proportional discharge outlet and overflow spillway. 44 0023 27 Geology 7* Downcutting, undercutting Erosion in this ravine has - Control flows into canyon with RM .50- of lower slopes -- extreme been aggravated t+y R/D upstream of RM 1.00. .90 in upper reach (RM 0.70- increased flows from upper - If possible, route runoff (from 0.90); box-gully up to basin and runoff from resi- development to south RM .70-.90) 22' deep. Deposition in dential area to the south. around the canyon to S 212th St. field at mouth. Worst erosion occurs at - Restrict further development knickpoint of headward along ravine edges; in areas migration (currently RM .80 north of ravine any future out- -.90) and will move up- falls should be tighlined into stream with time. canyon or (preferably) routed around. P:BR.APC/mlm C-11 Trib Collect. Existing Anticipated Item River Mile Point Category Prop. Proj. Conditions and Problems Conditions and Problems Recommendations 45 0023 27 Habitat Whitewashed, sterile Worsening of existing Reduce stream flow rates and RM .60- channel. Channel material problem., volumes to nonerosive levels, .80 is very unstable. Little then consider habitat improve- fish habitat remaining. ments such as large organic debris Steep, incised valley. for pools and instream protec- tion. 46 0023 27 Habitat Construction-yard drainage Further erosion and possible Notify Dept. of Ecology and RM .95 from existing pipe on top toxic runoff from private King County Health Dept. of slope causing eroded construction business. left bank. 47 0023 27 Hydrology 0309 Large amounts of sediment Erosion and sediment - Reduce the rate of erosion RM 1.0 are transported from the transport will continue to and sediment transport by highly erosive soils and degrade the system and require constructing an instream R/D steep gradient to the continued maintenance of the facility to reduce peak discharges, lower-gradient downstream downstream system. using the existing sewer-line reaches. This problem is right-of-way. Increase storage aggravated by peak storm capacity by expanding size of the runoff and poor develop- existing berm. ment practices (e.g., - Construct an outlet-control development on steep facility. As part of project, slopes). The resulting downstream channel will need erosion and sediment proper erosion-control facili- transport have led to ties. decreased conveyance- system capacity and need for increased maintenance. I P:BR.APC/mIm C-12 5 Trib. & Collect. Existing Anticipated Item River Mile Point Category Prop. Proj. Conditions and Problems Conditions and Problems Recommendations 44 0024 30, 31 Geology Channel downcutting, bank Increase in impervious area - Increase R/D, especially in upstream RM .20 erosion, landslides in on plateau will continue to area of Trib. 0024 (where most ravines. Natural instabi- aggravate erosion in the future development will occur). lity aggravated by ravines and cause deposition - The downstream analysis required by increased streamflows. in Garrison Creek. BALD for new developments should fully address the impacts of new developments on the conditions foun at this site during reconnaissance. New development that will aggravated conditions should be required to include mitigation proposals prior to approval. 49 0024 30 Habitat Loss of pools and instream Any remaining fish, benthos, Reduce flow rates and volumes to RM .10- habitat from high-flow ero- or macrophytes will be lost nonerosive levels with development .30 sion. due to the high, erosive controls and/or with additional stream flows. R/D at existing sites. 50 0024 30 Habitat Large quantity of garbage More garbage and increased -Encourage citizen project to clean RM .70 deposited in the stream. water quality problems. up the stream. -Large commercial area and parking lot runoff need oil and metals separation before discharge into the stream. P:BR.APC/mlm C-1 3 Trib. & Collect. Existing Anticipated Item River Mile Point Category Prop. Proj. Conditions and Problems Conditions and Problems Recommendations 51 0025 30, 31 Geology Channel downcutting, bank Increase in impervious area -Provide energy dissipation below RM .00- erosion, landslides in on plateau will continue to culvert outfall at RM .70. .70 canyons. Natural instabi- aggravate erosion in the Restrict development along canyon lity aggravated by ravines and cause deposition edges. increased stream flows. in Garrison Creek. -The downstream analysis required by BALD for new developments should fully address the impacts these developments will have on the conditions found at this site during reconnaissance. Developments that will aggravate conditions should be required to include mitigation proposals prior to approval. 52 NA 7 Hydrology 0306 None observed. None. Drop project from priority listing, small tributary area at top of knoll; city of Renton in agreement with this recommendation. 53 NA 7 Hydrology 0308 Project completed. None. P:BR.APC/mlm C-14 . • EXHIBIT D FEMA MAP l+} IA e S 44 r:� LLI W �x x.��,,,v� "k�, ;liip • Yx ;y, F 4 f'- :t W bS bt P F-�t•++33 �gisxw "'' r - } F R..P iii 4 ,,,,, ,4 L } §�'d 3�,Kia k,,,,,''j t,,x1 ,,: w hex SE , NInis x ¢ `1' .1, .� xu.' Az i ii -- t .., c q <IX N rgo Y Z.'• ' "g'WilliNgUirAMPICOOkiNWIA.ttPirrIdiVegt!”.00,04,40A0itt,,,,,4044.41k•VheowereeZior 1 • 7• � F. key f �' ; P it 9l ,iAy�{,, 3 �F 3yf'; t Y ' ., a�:.SSY �`ki MS V 3N3S :_ € .4, k H •• a. 3 t a i gorittifoeSipoppt ,r if.,,,S,44,,,,,keetl(1. b CC 3 F • 0. li srki ... F. Yt, l ei6 x§JiIdFJ va z S i v.) x'x.i x, ..>6 di'Sif.>'. likiiikkOWIlidivast � 1 xts £' MS 3AV WSu S i ! yW W ''' �kf�'W Q = ZZier• n pti ass N Z 1.4 , 6 �• fgitrjLfitkfr-jlfiegr •t•,'kNitrTitftttrditcekntifttrltt'\' :if;,I•V;;;4:;ht:4;.i:;;:.'.., 1.4t _ ��i FF.�I LLI ; r.Y O ,, j$p/;, x illaideaV grii I Z � m $ • • ' � V+ «,.,,. man.' ��xi'h N * r it, , 4,4 4.4.51.4 we:i ox,,,,,,,,,,,, a$11.46166.4v4i*,,,,,,t,,,04,,,,,,„,,„ „,,,, Skis&,N•iii., dF+. .#'6� F' ,� i,, F'ivm �+ kz A*& f` n' "ii:r�r5 S At ! ca. sr !k '�1k ai. ; ? i' ;` 2, � j 5, ,5 t S 1 ra , r , , }. ` k. e " : ; n } iv'�Eo .F O ' ea a, la wrp sx! 9:ria J ' ..., i•xt, ISIAlC, t}xi INCAI' .p x.•- � , •a3 ^a. Fra gi e • A ' t Q Z Ito 3 ;E. „44 4.„..w.iii,';,: ivro„,,,t,,,,,..,,,‘,„,,,...„,, E 3 'i S $. t £s i`Z U ' \Z F 1 H ,. 5 cc —, 0 7\' .:'141PMetf iftgre)(tr Aill't,'"r....''.Ai,,. i:Nowt:toil.- .atretriisddelpidipip, ', Z :.31":: �,. � z}tSX t; r k ` Wf b 4 tam,FF. i 4•tt SF}, t 't.:F `i4, ! - e ett.,44 S L a ',zi l'�{ iiiiii4w� F , c� 1.. ,If�ls ,� Yva' }t :. ;f' h,,•,z ,�'sr EXHIBIT E SCS SOILS MAP .- i • . 740,,rilL , .:, .,eldcr. • ..444 i .;:,.. . ink. .6ka., pr N14_, to ' c l 4,111 t„ iti .l' ,__/2.__ . .. ,ubsta.>-\ !,117.;•;0 k V'i;,. 14.5„I', IT I - ,, -.. i; . ., • -.ci ,Mli ., • , ,s, •.,,,Q,... 1.0,0k ., . ,,/A ft OU ..; ;;,; `,00 , ' . • -''' ‘,;.; 0,:Tifx11,3111 A SIM A. . Attf: \Ali. .. 1..ct li 4.-...,-,--,•!-:--ifi-IY.0,0:411141NiElflr.. :..,A,'4.!.- 7- 1 ,----).• - .: ' .: 1,....-.,.............._. . ::-.4..,A,.. A.......,......ft.w .-:-.- , .- ,,.. '.. ; . 1:L° BM :',,:•.: • • /it- -- . .iwi-A.r.,- ::..41w. ,vs,-.....i; . 1..filic ic.4.11t„," ;'- • . I Ria.,....------a,Te.,„. _. ,...., ..,..,..., •• ‘,.., , ., .1., ...., 1 254 _4111141111111111111111 . . • • /AWW"Ii.44:041 11.1. r‘ ss::. ''.4e,2-;:51PA$141911ditikil 1;.,!&-,,,Y•;...;44•77.--:-:7,,If.:;"..,,`.:::‘';''.',,,`,47.4;1447,14/4.7 ' ' ,' - --...4., ,/W, ' " PI••O.. .... .•3..4:..!a.....:- , ,. .i.;--,-11, : .- ' ',. .':..;k47?-4":7.1.". .';'•%''.'.:-'' : ' * -:----.14,),/1";r:4'--A:1 .4 '4.;.;.'''' ;S\ 1;310-7j191111141'011•Ikiatilel rill i'''''' • '`. A.,40t.•.:''''...,.- ,.`-' ---'-=:'''''''•::.;-:.,,l'.. .'4.1 Atto /.; ,//..`.. ... '..fr14 . ' . :,,,6*,11M.•---I .4.H'." : 04 4', -1.7,:,,4 ';4•4.,,,,,..„,,,• .- ,, __Z7.7•1',‘",•,„...,,i,...., ,‘ .i::.` ,,,.•:. .4-, .,. . ,,, dolly -.,„iiii,"Y.,v , I11: 1- 1) -..1 ,---i' . 11,10, '-.A.-74 '•,; .7 .,-+'''-.:.-::.-421t,,, 4P"-Ikliti,t, ''\,,,,.',.'t:.:•-1:•'IL,4, 7C -7.7rili147* A.''. YiN'll's: '• tr:-1 'M,' 1 ' I If I1 ,,, ;,,,,,,,.,t..s,„ tr,v.r..?..24.4....1.92...2, •'... ,:,....,:s7..4_,N..^",z4. -4,-......--""vc.,...7:i?„-giSt ' .- ,,,0' 11$11 . '''' W. ci ...." ,J)" ' ' ;''' 7‘. ."4kZe410;".4'67'%., .'".••••:.':'..;`'.:4:7>f%.,,,,'.4- ''''' ' 7'..1. .., ---:.!7.-'1' 2-4.1 it'. iito °,., '. ,,,,Jitz,,.-,;,,,;. --- 7426..-:',. c,,-:-,...".,: ,,,,,,i4. , ,..,4,,T,,,t.„ 4,...!4%.4. -- * . •-::.- saliwy4 j•ii' ';-.0 _._,--.•.117'. ,--.6.,, , 7 1 - - -.,,,..!'„ A.,: .7,i-rt?.-7.-.:.-----.=;--„,-4- \ -' ..: ; 4, .. . ;,01‘p!,,,,,,,,_ , . ,.:,. ,„,,,, .. •-"'-oic„,,,.;,:,,,,4,44, „,,:-.:-- :;-.., Ailuiri To,.' .4 ! : ,,, . ,fsf_.,.. _Am..' L,,,- •_. -.' INt.4 B.-.....:1-- .111'-; T— 1 - •' , - -„,„•,,,, 7 s a 2 f..: 7- \ '" 7:XA. '.;,.•-• '`*.- ' ' • I l' ,,, , ,, ,...• .,'.. + • lin,:0,- 1:1 —.- , 1' ' '-:1,,_.1.. ,11-„,"1:1 p4.---! V 3i•''',/lik; -N.:: • 11 ,, 1 4 "" -,\.1 '1,--., 'r, .'•' .. 46.• 'ff.'''''' ''','' ' • ' , „ 414* ' .-. '-;*-1 -,- tk"..,,,,,,,j, te ,,,..•.... gr.'Li , 'it. .''''' \ Gli 4"ise41„,,4V*,_,..,,;, ' - , I .i ', I ' ,:.-4.i::,.::::: 1 7 ' ,,,,,•;:x,... -„ I , ,Itrii, 3,,,._......,., 4 -,V• IOW% iomr:.04---- . -0- ,„‘', ilk -••,, . : • ..,4 , .,1, . :1 __, J •=04.*.i,-,----.. =''' , .- ,1,-- 4.,,,,',.v...4.-,_, t"',N,, Ilk ) r ._---.7...JA,r,.._..d.frigille---1-‘4,0. '"' 11 ' -48,g .44 Is Ri-t-4-..--„:2 %-r.): 7 .0.•1:...p-- . 1.• -','•I..*1:. ''''' t ...,-,. .,,,. .%P., . **41 ''''' . - • 4 '"' z,49t_o„..„ ,;.,..4 •6 • ...ef.:e•.,., . , 2..„. _.,.,, ..' ... .,, ,,,••••: ,0 F.., ,i.v r oft ...• ,• ,.,,, •,1,72,!...,. 11.1..,.., ,, 04it... --4.-4-..-; NS.---..„,„ -00:1,•'C •••aa'.:•;, -:--- ',I'.;ix, ;;;:iNaJ01,10.- _ ,,,,,T1• '. i ,.'f:•7::,:,17. ;:-, " .' '''\ . ' ' ..'4g,,ffLti1:4! . .';',•,....4 all''' '' ' - ..77-,, ,,-,... ..rm ,.,. . - ' i''' '4.---ili'lel‘11. '1``ts t't•'. -4 NI •••;,,Uf -•' , 4.---71111.-,-1::••"' -• 1 .gurti,... f! ,...., ,..,,,,...x....d.„.„,, , L.:as. ,k.,:A•,, „----.-', .., • ;-::„.›......— :.„7„-.-------ejk,,,, -4.7.-1:•=1, r...t..r,...-.1•\:.;610-v.t.i":5-7Favi,..ZOk,44, • ,f• ,,, --- fa.11 •A•_-:_ _ _,...T.,-4...-, , - ...,,r.,•7„7:,1t1 t.--,.-",‘..;.0.\;../.4 .'.!41,_..:;. r4" ' A, 11/''':..?...."., • .,•.,,11.1.->4.,\ „..•••• ,..._-, • 2:1[ ie. .. ,,..k,...;f4i v . ..;:,,,. =;--.01,,ta.....-,.. 16:,r,',., "041:!.A ,.,•/Ne,,,,- 41,,, i k......,,7 . II I.' ....,04 ';,',,•J'is1,-..% :: -' ..C.,.‘1, .-• ..' .4120 . :-,1 ... s.s..-...• - ., 1,4',--... • : . •-,.-,, ': ,,, i7., • .. ,, . •• ,t 11.•-•01- . :\ •kii.,i ..1.,,..--;..,2„:. .11 .. At,411........ -,\ ?ilif,1 :-.-,.i.4.- -1 — `.. "',:...-. . -..-- Eir :t ..ri.:.:''-• ,ff.'-h• ...- .‘;."54,::-.'.?.. .......-Airor ))1 1 # 4,--I. i..'..."..-.1.:.`“P" ',.1 IL; j ..'‘r':-.--, :m ' - ,.. . • "' ,;1 , •, • 14,0„,„,.....p....!,, ,.. .A . _ , ...15,11iii.1- k"-'-% .'• *- ! .$.". ,IA-.1-4•,,, L '-, ..A..:,;-- . 1,i,,,,- :-..... . ,..: •1 • .7.,A omigl. vi I L,,, _..-,.„7/._,';•..,..4', .A,S:,,,",t PEI ,,1Z,.' 1.;.; , ' :4,4 ' WI • 1 '7•!,;,•,- •"4"....iNkit..111.111 •'• •! :-.1' 21* sk :.-k-1/4; 11,4. 1...--;*,;.;;...-:;.. .-k.. ...•, •,w,i, ..,f;,, .:-...-,...* . : -- ' , ,,.:* ..: ,.. , ,,,-....-,•:.--,,.- .'-• . .~ ---- - .. .. t...., . '.!..,.'-'744;:::,p-,:;:',,tiro'‘+ -----' V": •.` ,k32.- ,,,,...•... 4:.. .- -.- .'1' r.;11, lici.,: 'Y 4:Y-.:,;'.A:4.- .5t ]-. I?:-; . •i r 2.,; ' 4:4''' ic-::'-,:?;41;',•,.. 74<: -!, '''' A47, -.: Or-A .44,01 1.:...,...,1,•••,,,,%.•N • - '• PI '... , K.:. :'..;: .4;i5r.::• ••i•t4 .":, ',f; .:,.' -2:\r,;, •-,•4 r.. ,4,.. . „., , .• . .,., . . 04 .,..: ,4., s.1 , •', .73i,, . \N., . 74, 4,,,.../..,, • ,.. ,-,_ ".• '' ..i. •' • • 41 14: ...tittf.- • --.'.: N.,.--,,-.1: -f-.. ..- .. 'I...\\,. : ,.. , :. „tr., 4.-., , - . .'‘.3. li I ' p. 1 i.. •:i.,.•,;,.. . ,At ...' :- :,-.A.,; .,:;:::;."..:• , . • . ... : ..„ ,-.-.',..7".' ..;:t •-• 4." • . ' te•I'A it,....- \Ss 434- ylita,A,.q. SOILS MAP NORTH...., EXHIBIT Fl COAL MINE HAZARD AREAS -- '' '-'''' . \:- ..."nikairallix 1.:1 :! . ,e- 1, eiti,..,„,:, ,„ , ,, ''\ •. .,., '�f` �1 ,:� ,. ,...b a +' of o f (TA �l` ,�,� > j' .,` • \ 1 . ---\ . .. ,.=1. ) -,.., 11.3-- y• II i a^^ �'� !- h«��la rl�eraye .> / kit i , IFID - c\ n �111 �R4�py yrni� 1 '• �..��� C . • e` E WAIN' T r i''\ h "` ilik' `� sLE J ) i� alinl"rN } g jk...' •... .,,.. 4110..,,4 ft-ii-. ...,N,340 inall IN 11111;ti yAris 2\. ... . ''''. NOP • •. • :i �_ �� � TitAl�,�ry Mawr 1 �� / +S' ha smii / `:\ ti.4, "M "�` .'� 't «� .ate A 1 C \ice`, ►� y: 3. 1- 6n 11611 y �, �}I., ' I, y g _ 0 i N`` :JLE- °� �'} -`li firk• I� 1 " ,L �'� yell,74,131,7E IP..\��• . , •j11.e ��Nhx ' � ! - 1LjIIJ1 tl . M\ 1 1 . . NI iiittrcu a P' 1� �I J , ' J.:.�- I4 c E t.�'f� a `� E thr.% ffi >� _�' / Alt. '( 'A r ■ 1 -mWa iterfea71#1,19Z47 .. -7': ../ CII �ikt � U` II i1a� 1�l� liiN. ria' �i1Ui�i t �� r 111�f; : a i]1i SY. A 40110 i �' , ...«..) ■11 ij'I iy c,•'_-,1+, E , 1i1�'�ii� p ®1 \� '; it ;: N y ttiloit. •- 1-4 • ,I��. Mile riii o �, Mn 1 , 1� .r , ,ate► „ ; t -,..-.....,..i, I Od• il ��--.,-Ismerrailantspivolk.„4 r • '-•.4' (- 'St'lir-/AO"- . +111111---"'irirciv%,."if/ IS41k.\ r':''' - Vf4. \e:• 44i...*•, .. ";--'4,( ritc,14 • 00.m. 'iv.- . i mile_ook.. :‘ , ire.i:Ej , "-gig,,. ,....„.. i_._ _1 _ _ ‘,.... ,ii.E0,..!.4 A. -4,A lig 4,-7- .1--zEt igyiplavembh _lgiectiti1/4 ,,,lrAleAlk,7,'4) T-iiiii (au ,,v,i &c,,, 111-7 El iii int. 11.-ja ,, s ' Asw•gorkowil ,israjnilL, , ,... i :r ��i 11161 aIIIlrt11l;� ®','f ; , * iii! vb.: .1 --;.r-� '17 4'11I4 .N mob le l �l IdlikillINSMOrar.�iiikJR� IA wiR 1. �1 �: zs:,,,,, ,. -—7 {.^ - I Mil. I ry # , , •grill 1�'1.�irgrdi ` • ) i1 1111MIXU4i ,; -; h 1 � J . . I l •\e 1 AGS Q!` � , c� Z i�l Li COAL MINE HAZARD AREAS NORTH SOURCE: 1990 KING COUNTY SENSITIVE AREAS FOLIO EXHIBIT F2 SEISMIC HAZARD AREAS 1 1 1 0 *; • `+ IES'3t po '.ice iw^ `�) I/*, LL ::.:, cc...1. >a .I,1, I. . 1. " �? t = 6 V' k�lit3i r�"�S. T3 �Bf l 1. TI[Cd / ` V 1' , : t u ' .. ' s. . II/ !,' V p {IlI !i 1 1. c. - -- ,x..,,,r0„-1. ,. ,, .<, tik.: ....... :,-.,.. IN i. * ,..7 • A t, q‘. : .,,&4-: .:104111/002- ‘'.7.'•./, ' --- c‘''''' MN .1 Julfrrs‘_,,7 • r-ii'�' /lt._ ., 0 41 yttt.��. .1 iipt 4 I • t.• y� 1�1�1. ' I ;at:� ; a 1.\ j_ _g, - ._.. if so. ' ` irsn\lair r +\ ila 1'. all .. � ,7{ ) .�, I- * . � 21i Wang L 1E.,..1,..77,-.411 f lass _ A 1 f ilm Iun'4�\ �F. um imit 1 _'- S� It 4, r ` ,11, I milw. R��i L mod '4_ ' '\ :(: 1� ti; 1k. F« Ale® n o \. ` M ''I �t���i �� �: ' • Ag e . ' to ;�. • �.- �s� A .y r� ,BE.�1 ,, 1,1 igiret. O . ••Ifffinitizigli irli\f\/ .." ,.,, ,4)\ .„. 2..,c_<...........,. ,,T.1 „IN-11111$.qof .riot.:, . ;‘,,,.,` ''� I' 11 illnk II""tit!MI'•'*\ li\ '(:,...-,,:•\% ,,,:,'!j.7..'414'71: .4.,.:11' '•‘• '‘ -W- filv, 1 - 1_,:s'7'.--, - -,e, Lignimetingtival ,ill , ,i((•' lit _I:. Iffloigi /., kin.ki .t,a S'y' ...t.:__ -.111M1.4111025111 rA,.• 17\ \-.ti, - v,.,,e..= :.-- TomP11.41"alit ,..,., p-,L 2, , ....,_41,., ii&J , :.-7- 4._DWAilF,, g. ‘,-; \--....--0.,; -4,,,,;!›. •-• .2.1/ ''''''.4 , . '.1 :4P Via 0124 1.444621 I ' Illib - II ;L, 1 SF I' ' 141,30, tgi AN way::: ewe crier ig 11 ! arl �� I:ivo t ' ,I EpiliN Id.. ,,a,--'i iyiiinilmorimmutartd, , R ...(11 \ 1 ''. -' 30 ,zia,,,ir- II. — 1 i'w 12tBAttah J . c SEISMIC HAZARD AREAS NORTH IOVRC6:1..0 KING COUNTY SEN:.ITIVE AREAS FOLIO EXHIBIT F3 LANDSLIDE HAZARD AREAS ',-'` .,' L'e:-,1 it.law A :i' . +. , :'./ 0- ,. ) : \et i di -e Li Ilr;i:' _, ,- ;'N'N'-'1..- • t\\../'''' ,114,11,,:; Willijpiliga":1":7:7-- ilirlit5:!,1 ' '1`,‘ .��. li 1(:' �q\`1I. iSf- I ,nl..'��r is jjoe ti �aY¢ii .r 'v�erra�aA �3 ' - ' a,,_II.`, .Ut 1 r'.�. lii:/ fv8 w .S. twi ni .a r. • i /,(. 9f IY @�"`IK .,. C T 'Nit. t `,tci O k . :.�y fi. y` 71� •�.ATTI.F.,,,,,,.. ... . ._ .l' �Ie,M 1= ' M) i � 'tr.a i{' .� �Q9-ems._ ` 111��--{{EE� "�v A , . jib${ A n Ma''' �`�� 1 it, _..v,1', ,/tit; - \ ..,-,----.0...1.3-x.-1-- -,--0 i � l `• . ' 1 i / '4 h 9 1., ,4 I a i - k > J: 11 =ran 98�� � ti �� � 1 � �` , . � • kit y e LLL� � It ark !: R ��� � _ , n -" r r .t •(l : v�— 17 Ill' , Z y. • falli . _„4.,k,..,,,, ,,, ta, 9a 1 lt "ilik...-‘''?•'' N � ) ,i,, ziiinflall �' a ? ,d ` • ( • rf IU\.\ � "1'P it 'y.1_ �: T l - IL,,, ` t4 r]v 1 s � , - ` e .,P,f oilil% t--c ,v FI f�4:, l . siikt.,411 xt- ` ' I ' ' %ac *datum ii: ..- , „ e �g i2 Nei? 1pf 1. . ,,4,A m ® � V) ` ;iE Yipx � wi Ilk; g� • f ,� � sip11f/Y/4 V `° •' ay ,, yyj mi 1 a � w- �, R !ggpp *Slat. 'b'le 1'n .. 11 !l 'tft , 1 ts) , ' 6,,,t4e 1,.1.1.1.,----_,,,-,l4,-11/i � 93EIS 4e ec:,, , \ {(y e��,o�.�„) ,,f,,.). ,_ ,,-1.-0,.,-Q...!..a..40.00. \,,...,1%,,,a--... ,, _. ..- , , , 1 6.1, , 11. .,0,11.,. rti. 41,,.\„ , �(f® e�il,=�li���'S,`k,,�,j�`��i�yfl�s� it t !o � r�) •sail, ligehawAr , Ae, Iii., liatileff,aril p li,44 'Y1431�� s;�i`i.1_,r A�� ill , 2,s j 1 c till.. „. 11 i1 i ?,, � ; ,m �efuniii a ,alliil - ` 7 I. IN 1411V ,.. a ��`1� ,(\ .[I,T .nsisivelm,...,..0.,....,, , , ,: -,, , . ... ... 1,30. li , r m�—.� . LANDSLIDE HAZARD AREAS NORTH SOURCE 1990 KING COUNTY SE!,SITIVE AREAS FOLIO EXHIBIT F4 WETLANDS I 1 �j '12 g �r v 1 �`t g , 1 i 0 4 ,N., AwAlk ,,,, --tio: � , 1 n!.1•so ESIRL. ; it: ,i, ,,) , .. \,(',4„ v., ,, , , , ' \ t- TA Ll , % 4eL s r o ,\,\\, i„,,,,,,L.,, '.-N-11,....17, i , _ .,,,,„ ir • yA//I ! •J ad I I, !Ylg' �J - ♦ Al.'s . .E ii,A 1 1 3' ..\ ,\ ,\ tx � F �4?L.;9y1� c_P • . . legi`uL'Jith°I'a. \..:mow ' y ,:( still_\ll_ lffratele• s •eta �rt ••ih ,,,,,, , , _.r ,....,s, t, u.....3.0 4 • ..w.--.H.,,Ittql 47,,, .....- �, � ' -., ,..� �" � ' mom :� - . ; li,, ?" tT�.11tr `1"`0.-.��/J b pi* �< 1 ii .!L\ ■/I -.rt �- 2= 11 A A 5i",' \ oar , . Ink .3. ,, , , „ie. ., wiroy„,i...11 Emif , . ffe.i. .,1 NE,ri7i • ,.,...mwinaaltk\t olt i I am',,,,l,,L,,,'I,.__. boUlp.0 +.31 \ Ar ► it. Lki •-.-411k. .,,,,,, io ..,s• . fie• � , - ` :i4ARI I .'*S�`r:■ 44,i 14 j ::�4 •se \ �f' . _ � R=�i$1/1:1i \R s , y ilfsthriogrsilk43! '1,1k f.'7.., -A-_,r-1" 1-4:1' # A,-.I' '"/ -41,-, Illivfill 'At istilik.,...,-1' -% - f . b^ 1. 11110„ ,., ----'2 NZ.). --e - .''-' - 16- .,.�iir f- ifike 14 ��- ,•-"�!� I id aut. a wr fir- _ 1 .yamizi b Ira, `r am . _ems � I1tIP;Rra . �sim �� ;1 JIMIVIONSIllir r 01 � 4:2 $ iP2liork \-- I • 1 I i QVS WETLANDS /� 1 NORTH SOURCE:1000 KING COUNTY SENSITIVE AREAS FOLIO EXHIBIT F5 EROSION HAZARD AREAS . ....''. ,-,k_:i. v ..s.. ..:.., .,....i3O•.,:. 17.„216,,,,,,ti,.,,,,,, • -c,t. ..,, x- , ›ii -.. ,-;.—f:- , , .1 ..1111. lig.;, lik '..- ' ''.i:•, , ' .5*,-6- .Li. 'r\., '''.W" •* ,\ ;...:-;.•!.\ ..... !-...::, ;..1-0,-:, ..': 7 , s. \—..,,,.. , ..v,17 ''' OIL . - , ,. ' . '\ !'"---...---- ;. - -;; ..-- 1:, to r p• . - ,- ',: . , ::.....i.....;,i• ..., ;-:, \ i .1, L., )•,. I I:.,417,, 1'; ' • A' I ,, ''..T.;'!,`, \''t\\ '"S. •\i . ., .• • v,....' :' -,- ,; I i '-.•„,p:Y., "Ag'. ' ••,, 1 % gn. . \ , __,....,.. ..! .1 •L.,...,,,,, \a• . _/ r 'r• ,,,; • -t '' fr„ .• .-• \ ,I'e _ 4, ; . ,.., •*t, ‘..... , :•' - —-I il ,,, ,. 2-7 .,1„.. ' . "4--,• : •••'.''-,- 'a•'''' -4:* , • u. -,'4".... ,,,, ' ,,,„.1".?-- ., ',4 .; '•77.:i:: -4, , 4 11- ,':i ' • • .. r-:,- , .. .. __ ..c, ....-?, , .. ,__, ,......, _ .- - ..,.:, 4, ./.___,.."" 1: : 7":n. . i --_, , :,.. t. ' \:N111 ,--- --,::: ,..‘----------- .--. -0.,•:.•••- __t . .,-,,:g,,_:,.. .,.\-;.--,:: . .. -, - . - i 1 '•-CK:3' ' 1 '. it; '4 ''. • / '..;',... :‘ ..' 1.,f, ii-- .. •(,...,.: ,..'N.k...., if ' 1*7•.I.'Irl I' 1,,::N'. . ' ''''.s..i• , v., • • 4-4 - tT1',\,\,,,, ' - : -',L., '•—•';';'.., .,. Y IT 12 1 I '‘,;,,' :,,';',', l'i-N, 4-'1 ''s\ A ""A'. -)"----;^-1! • '''' l' 1 .1 ICC'' •-!"...,":--...1 :, .' -- 1 ‘."': ;•,‘.'i;',)':\„1; : . t ..:7`. 1. "} . ' "Iil'-•-e ', -.'-'.',"-..;''. ,- "' ''''I'''' .\ IRV- • f., t', - .-- ? ,•_:_. ; • .\ ,•.. . ,. i',-..k,' 1::;.! - -.. .,:r ',....,..A...,..•••,;-.., •, ,, -7:"‘,<-...\ ' - ita r -1,:,,_, • . _-_,/, _,• ,,,,,,, .....,..,i,,...Z.i-k,,:-•,- r..--- , , , 00s '•, / 11 fi:,-: • •-.1:--1. :7:-...1i.‘i .\‘:„, '''...:71,k-,p-..:: 4-1. p...- :It14:::.it '. :11161_ N s:7.-..,---,,.'s.i'..,..->-..:' \- Ag,.....vdt '., ,-,- \t" i 'gig;X-,,,‘" '',' • 1,N : ,-. .i.t. ,.., s-_. - 1..---, ir 1 ' h, ,A-' III ' -Zi" ..' \;,10,,#jr--. ,, Ili t,,L.,-t-, t' . .;ijig'jj2s;:.• '':-.1 - ' ,J • RN:, 90`._. ___-.1'2., .,..: . ' ' ti - -4,-*tsi.' "7-' 4. F.ttii - '` ' . •—. ..;'-'7•N,\''•', ' ;.... •.' ; ,......r-ri,;',\`‘." .;,' -, ••••./., •i ' iii iv 'kii - ,,,': . %. 1 - / ik: i i ' ,'' :: ,..-.,%, :>\--. ,. • : ""--..,2. : • b',..':':.','-;11111 IN\ . ..---- .A1111 .4:. , :‘`: 'iillr I :.i :'.'" '-if'. ' •".."I 14.1.,,,j. . ., •:, 1.0* ,4,,,,..,; , , ,,"....,,,.. .,..----.---. *..ri - ..Omni 5'All _______-.--/ III ' ,1 't - 11111211r. .' ..k`,-:'..,•,.;' • I ,;;.1.:. '...' ihnis 1 . „ , :qt.,. 1111". '•..r.''t ,..iiiplek... . . ...„... „I .. `9•1".", ,,. , -..; ,`•!•z: - ,,, . , ,,,- -:.-,4-_:.--:: .',..,„':_v ' il•, , w*\‘t,.-. -:. .441.:, . ..,,.--. . ---, Y - . -;- , '3 c 4-,,,,, ., _.• s.,'..r. ,,,tv7.--L,-. •.-.).s . 1 .., , . . 1, , 'ir, -.., N-2, „,........,_-i .. .tisalo -,., :.,i4 prilip 10.4,---7 c' . ;,•.:,4." .- 1\ ' ,, '. r..- .... - ,, -.....„-mdilk,21:.'' ., 1 I• ••.*VP..'•,:, :K., I, ::I: •,. ''4.i•*.,.. • ::.:.: — •4,' ;:vik 111' ,1.-iiii lk rt ,, . .. .:: ,7'.': " - • • ',.., ...,,--7 -, .: ii pol, v---.1k,„kii,,• ';.i.;...,,.,, --,.-. : ' ....::::1.1 • \ .,.114111.)\.,':. : . dm '''... --:.:-.:, iii ',lc,. iilik iwo.ou i.•:....istie.i._,, idb,,.-..h-rif.:,N, :i.,,,,,,:,t,,,:::,-., 1 ity , , ,,.A • i .:: :ar ' ,.-. , ,,,,-as,. ,--',-..*. -..',, . , .f. 3 ; -...17. '',, .`. • ..; ,°,--,,, , ,,, ',. '`.--,:s .'ll , ... . ,. . , ,..- ..e. ,, ,.., __.. ti,. , ',- V1 --,.. '?.,',1. (•1. - - y_.• -, s .:\. p ., l''',..'4: '''7"....;:ifita,...011M;:"41441neAtiAtif ' :..•:: 1:/.-,,. 2 t.,'"0"'`PM L .' rir If 111111r-t-,-- _ .... 7, -).\•er.,,. '4•16....,,: .,.., . -• '..; . — , , ` !-. 7--', wli. ' -w--jha I , i•"- :2 'I fm, hilijm...• ali . , .. 1 _:',.-• V."4.. , I Allairs.--4 • : =. -, , riEg .- 7 7',„.. Allit'. -'; , --..c.% 14,25-1,11C “ .-..-. • 4. .. ,fj-'/ liiiMAIIIMAkt % lb-MI"' .1 - - i (:.11111111aggh,- ,: -,,,, • ' sergiman aiwz.iintr, 9-iL : „..- .,,, .1x.,\.., .....111,2F7,,.,. io-e.,,...fP'• . ... MN ii • - '..,,.'1 i• ' I . 11111MININIII Tj',I2::. ..--',4 :r ' I : i ff- :. . s.\-- . , .,, Etimaimly,,..." ., : .... '! : 1.--77--"' . • .!•,,,:.! . '' .1'71 -.• , '',. - , ,1 _ 12.,,.,;:. ' '' •) ',: 1 MS ,, 1 -•to . I '. 1 ' , : ;1 • C, ..Ss dt'14.X. EROSION HAZARD AREAS `',.....,...# NORTH ;OURCE: 1990 KING COUNTY SEN.ITIVE AREAS FOLIO EXHIBIT F6 STREAMS AND 100-YEAR FLOODPLAINS i .. .x. .. ..., ,, , .- ...--t_._( ,.h..-._th:; : L4... ,. _._t, ,. ..,,.., p5 . .. ,...' . .1 I-E \\ok 1 ,.A'. ,_. ' '0" F6 • e4 } Ii T `-r•- j,, '- - • �, rz i • . .-i -- ' e > I- 11 ':114t.4',I;: '''. r'•-• ‘ .1113:24' • ' -: , ,,,. X=ra,', -.,,„' • — i' - I \ i. ,, •., , ,- tom;_ ;t s r - - .< i 1 r_ 1;$1`i 1 Z''.. ., FL/_ _ IL 0 mu I •."•3:••.0 mk1../4,.1:,Mv..m..=.,\•r-/i'sTiU'.el:,.M(3I-i7 1'u Ia1',.I-mVss yam. 'e'•.,i,,st:i'.t'ttiil.A'l i,i',',ii:,.-t'--i''. \ 4 'c N rr i92,.,-..k••.,Of--4i-.1,s6'1„.1,r‘.-.._._,5'o1,',1f.1.1,1"1'- f n,k. I.' ,-'II,•V w 1*,-'.•I--s:,wI'.K1.‘,.lN:q,v,.'.1.,-.`‘\m1:i:-.-'W.,_.1- 7 �e .` ,mot t ,1 .1k ' 17 •airs r r.,,l i4$v l.i,,a,.lk' -`7''\..%-(.'A:1,t I\.'m.,••;,.,.'::,-•,'-..\,'':....4..:''-',4\ '4„l•L1,,i:'it'ii i„,t--.t:,,.',-,:•.,',_.*••Z.‘..•.,t,:,•.,-•,•:•.-1•,.H..•4;,1,,1.,f.;,,.,t:i.‘,.,.-f..,--*,,,:*.`l.•."-':-.:,-...iaI'1:L.,'..,./-.;1:.:•...-:.,,...'_.,.. ,:•- ,.'-1..".3,''•s1",-N,"t---N4 it'. j7 ��i l # iiik kA'. X'+`i 1 I�feJ'•s,; $ ^ Ip'I a, 1 Ike, rtr,si 4 i3f" , A rF;," R.Qk .`—rE\yi th- 17,11 +L 1Rr1.G4 j ®,l 'c ._. , . tee' ._ , r-. Ir �.::I A" Iii it Pik Mit 4 i. k'.. '1' j ;;ji:' . . -.liv. Z- ' • l l I . . Urn 1' W 1' ' `. o 1 i1• wog' �,. ' % 'Nam_At . .23 . r 401 .f�.s 41 � 1'rogo J7 (• ark , ... • ..,..,;. ....._.....,,,Ji , -) ram/ atab ® ''�iE" r'~ �` , , I ! ,i1 . .16.154411 fi.t.smiinupt. .. ® EAtL� I.Mia ~}Mk 1 "gyp11 ,1'7a • It,'-l M A�, i�3li1 1 m J 15 �� i �� A. ss`, I 0.L ‘771.:Ai:V, STREAMS AND 100 YEAR FLOODPLA[ NS NORTH OURCE: 1990 KING COUNTY SEN!:ITIVE AREAS FOLIO EXHIBIT G UTILITY MAPS _ __. 4313 E 1/2 • . _ 0170. 1: 2126 11 ..... ..•- "*... i.,' 0 . :: ' (t09 .1•9$ :sr aw..%2138 I 160 XXX ,/••• Nri• CX3 . et Ia. ; • /_,4 . 0 : 214. % .., 2140 2i35 212ii ' _,, 7th St iiicic i 2., i • , . ,../ -lb .Yoa— NS i' •-IC • / •-14131 0, Ohl I .// ,.e, ••''''''''''''' .-^2136-- * 2130 IP „•-• .... : 31 i 4/34 2290 11 ' gg ,.• / .! i 1 i . IP • ------,............,....„",„, -••••••• /2 4 , ......... .,.........„ ,),(r/e 372 •,. 4 0 : : in s'•••....... ',... .4 ••••1. 1 ‘, 1 ii, . 8 ...........8, t CD ' 3 . 1 III 1 p a:5 • 2992 * `,... •••••• 9945 / '''........ 1.1 1 I k n o :c..., .._ I .• 2,1 . - * ' • ; 3"7 10"313oi ' ....... . • i C/D / CC (1) I ...... 2993 ••• • ,,,.. .. , ig 1 0.. %, 3118. 3128. i2212 N 0 ............... . \ • •• 4119'• \ .. ....•0-• 1 0" 4). • 0 i ! (1) . ................. N ''' (3) • s; 4 CI D , •' II C9t:25 I 3134.. 8 / •••• : ‘ 1•••••• ---"... 29ae •• • 3121—14.3122e ; : ' 3115 i. —3120 3123 /1- ?126 --3136 it Ci) • 31 4 0 • •,.::. cf),1/2, \ i...-• CZ 13137 • • % 1. ......• • • I 8" El ! ... sa) ,. c?.... 0 . ., ) • 3105 i .. -*et i '. 3110 N,14 ,--.. t 3102 3112 • r--1 1.3101 i .. ., " k 1.3109 1 OH 3111 -I 3113 I 1 i • i 1 C ...it (.1)‘ \ ) 10" ID C1104 I 3103 i i SNi ...,. .144- ••••-• • k, a:5% ,..3106 • 1 •i • . .., • -..— ...e.,..„.• ......... 1....3091 -,..,............—,.............,.........343 3145 ,•I '0 „Is.. 1: 3105 —31°4.... i ,... „.... ,\ .. 12" ,..... .,,, .. . .. .....,.... * ! S `:„.••••---•-" - idiis .- • ,,,--:-31-6:4" • .: cti • 3107 .P5 • i • • ... 3092 ' 3095''''''.1 2 ... •-• -. . a•-••••••---."- . .....„ „ • . . • • (--- • S663 ... .1.r.) * ,------ .,....-306- ..•3079•••••"-- • % ..: -,„ , -,•,....;•::::::•:%%."-- : 0 . ...! , ) •-c.1 ',374 ••••••• • :i 4.- .i............--- 1 1 • ........ .......... .., „,••• ...,...... ... I!...'....'"... 2 .. .....•• OD, ....,,.. . .. ..• •........••• • 3061 • .. ••••••••••••• •.• • •' .. ••• ..... • • PC:e•••••• X60,•1° V2- ....... N74*-- ••••••::31•• 3188 ,r'' ..••••••• --" ...." . .\\ (6. 3°38,,,..... a ,-' \ I 61 . 41 ,...,- bric I . .... ; ..—......., SITE 2" kbal < ' . ." 0,6. ..i.......... 4 kl '...G.'c Ll'''' ,.• '''" w**'.''''''*.. • 0 6„ DX 1-405 / ...............-- ) . . . ..• .,,, ,.... .....3...i,,, '-.;-.. •,2022^ •. .el • . ••••es' k4 •"".' • • / ' 3009 •• 3010 •••>••••''' .,4413 .... .:1),,,,<• •••*•••••'w'•••"'" 5..60/7 .9... 6 4, 6p r,• .. , .........,„-xa -- 0( • SW : .. 3oti ,..---' ,••••• „••• tI .... , (-) . (.4 , __. , •.. ,.... :.,......... 1 2" N.) it ',SW 6th St. ".-15 e5 . i . 74-5— , -;342L-3o4o :3142 )33( • : \ • XX( ......... -.. , 30521,....—„„„ • 30/i 3071 ---iitti!-- - 1 • -----199L•••-sozr--*--,-,,-.. 110( ••=c-3°36 -- • !.... 1 i )04z • 3053 3°54 / 3013 ...'• i.4,-).21 • 1.42' • i E 4 ) : ' 1 .......". CO • • 0\1 Cl) CN i ............. •.• Z b q4vFi- 0 y6 I • 3327 12-X0( 1 0"3240 — • 4044 1 .. ii . 1..... 3242 I . • \ . i i 1 0 6., 3050 . . 3040 \\ \ ' ' -- 3244 3243 32 ! \ \ 1 , • v''', )00( r-Ci 7 I —3246 a *a •.. 1 1 2,, 3364 xur c":00c ux ••••\ / . c--'', 0 -c.H. ..__- CC •• .\\\ \ .,. 3247 1 1---.. Da Da \\ ‘.... >FT :13059 -I 8il 3250 ! 1 0 ......__ / ,'... \ • COI •3248 1 I. (0 I C24 ? 70 .:JJ 32 9 li: 111+53/3z3 • ... . 3035 3024 ..... ........ ........ .. .......... ......... .......... ......... . ........ . ......... •••..... •4,..... -N.. ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ........ ........ ........ ........ ... I 3068- mix N91... I *, 3117-• i ..... \ s, 1 2' 1 3025 / 4, 3057 n sr - 7 .---__ . : : : Eitt -I, : 0 — „8" x« )13( -. I :.;1- I -4-, • . 4 . .,.; * V .3279 t200 -.._. 141U .- 6 • „- ..••• (-- . • • ,... ..... : • 6" : : • / .. • 328511-(' •..." \ x I 1 I i -4:1•• ' x i •. •.. ... . __ ' 3286 • a (....4. i I 6"I tl• ii •1 . , • .4" 6" I ... ••.. .... \ ..r.3287 i ..;..v...... ........... ........ ........ ..... \ .... • . / 1 Xa I tg. ...............•" .••......"..•.....:.::::::.:•'.. .... ........ ......... ............................. '.1.. 1 :I )00( PRV 417t1 "e4 - 2cN\3°5°...'..*:::::: ..... ........ ....... ........ ........ ...... . . ( 400 UTILITIES DIVISION 4325 E 1/2 800 0 ,,,-,..,•---------, -_-.K1+ P/13/PW '11,CHNI,CAL SERVICES i 1 :4800 4324 E '2 ...__J_. k'N.:s 02/25/97 1 __ .. . - 11111111=2= ,••••"•-•-•"•••••--•-• "- - • . ...... ,,. . ., • .• . . _ . .--. . - F2 - 13 T23N R4E E 1/2 . • l • " ..1 • n '. )r 1,r.'1 A.;' : - ‘..., •-• 'f ti ri Is c_l 1 V IV;f... ..:•:,;/111 t\SX/IFI v f ik Ir' •I /- • . . - -- • • • ,•,• , „..,,, •, - A : ./ i . j; / 0 ,. ;•C•.- 1 ..:---*-: !a I'-3 • I , . ./.. 1 • •-• rt,i, 1;/ . .,,/,. •' • .i t;,.•,... ...,;:e.:...)i) 1 !,•- ..p, ''-z\ -...:-•</•• \ ; ‘, ••••..-- • ,--....• ,. 'W.',• , '' ,4, k. '.. :..3,./ k. : .....••. ' ' .. \ LI, . \,, ii+i .u•••1,9. " ; s)},1... 2, .. ' .. 13,(1-8 -,:ta,... ,;,/ 1.1 v.\\ , • , -\ , , ,. , ., • ,,,, \ N • , ..• •,...., /r • ; .. \ 1 .ci ‘ . i . t ,..., r...,;.1 . /". •• • • •'. .._,/i.:\.. ,......!:,,,- i.t!1 . • • •Gezi:•••••,,. ittli , ,... - • ‘ ,qi / i• .! `" '..., • -• - ---,..zr' • =<•••••tc.:5---•\).. •-, eo.km .. 13,10-5 li.0..,....... ...... ...., ,.......• ‘ .7.77.77...........'. 20.EZ-1 • 4 -11 . II: A.4'..,-) ) . . ''''.1I r.• „11 ''• -. . • ""InWill • .‘ A....1: ••, ., , i / . ''. i r \ i . 20.G1-3 i • 1 , (......... r,',80.C2-11 • .,3!!! lh'•li s•, -,'... , •.88-)• .., , '-• C) .••-•‘1.111 6 lib' • -''''''...: .• '' • '•'',..-z••,,.. ..-• '• . ; , 1...,./....-'.) 2 irm, ...- . • , _:...._ ,t; . • 20.G2,9../ 0 IV) ‘.-......-,- ' t 1 CC ..?‘' • 21.1.1/1 .. \ ....--, • P - - el.l• /!'s.‘ ' •1 ci S --------.., •i 10e1C1-1 0 ft, • .1 ...••...•. (00001111 '1, \ \ ',P... `.• I •-060/4,..,.,s,.. , I! f (Ci IF , ‘.. .• , 'N.:, '''. ,., -.,i, • ,4_, 'I ) • su i . . . . . - ''.... • ' : ) \. ;,..1-• .1)': 1 1 • ,, I Cn lc • 1141'. •• ! . 1. \y.w. t•,,,,. 44. \ :,: .......... .,,, v s , ...\ , i ‘,.....,.. i :-. .• '-i)..4 \ '''1' 1'- l'. ..o.4 ; \ .•,' ; \, S ) " • 4....:,•.....• .•• •.• ,. ........ , ... ••-••. .,.,C•,:',-..-;•,....-..'...-•S,„•,•-•..•7•:•.•-:.••;r;_;-•:-„:.1-.4-,•:,,•„,--:,-'',-,',.,..,.1..„„,:„.•.-„.,.:./3,...i.:.•'.)1..,,,...:1;i ., s\•- ,.•.*,7* ‘°1<. . . •,/1 s'i,1''‘c., I 1,.''1111•516 333-- !•'.:..•-j a-.-.a..--c(-X•i-. • \....y•••"-i.,....,•‘....: -,..f..•'\r .,.g \ . / 1, < 11.13-11 0--1•- 1 - ,:.'.•i/..••-',...--',4••.• • •'i.. . ' • '443 i .N , " c,..,)......,, ... ....,, c.c:3, , , ; ., , , , .s.,;,,..,,• ', , ..7, .,,..- '-'4:..„1, I. q. 04', A\ t.. 111,11M ( c. .3 f • I) r" r ,,,, , Atli!. , t , • 1 (..-.1\\ i‘,..., ex.,N.,•.. ,, .i ..:41 .. ,).. Ts..1.1.1' •,,•,,•• ti• 1, •.9+ k., c•••,:) e, ( . • . 101ii~ 1 ,.. IOW 'r' .. .... ••-:-.:.7•'?/"'."'''et!).1 ‘ '. 't., t \,,i • 1 • i _ . '• '•.. •.,-,C,.. .-1.:....'s•-i t,;. 4.4' '• .‘' '• (' ''*.Z•••\ ! CI ' Wu.- • • . EOM-4 1 jr. l 4.14' ie ' s' '‘I • 4.1, ' 0 - . , ....., 11 c ,...'..,, -..... A.hL , \ .ni3C' rt \ V. - 44 '•:A, 1 . i c 171-• 71;•-•. 1 I • pp........Y i .:. , . .4.- ., 1 1 • . , • ',:‘,.....:.:•,, . . Al. \--, \\.\ t,, • -ea-, .,,•cq.--.3 4 . I.7•'.- .0 i V ., / ! .0. „.,1 ,,. . 20,G, 4 ee Lit 1,1.0. is. L......10486.4$.4:4. . „.......-' .',.„.....1....°...!...11,;....•:.20.1.l:::.14-••;-4.--4."-. \ .4 _.•-4-_,-,'"r•••••-••.--••, , .. 4 :---....t.-- 0 .. L.,.., •\,, .,i.,\ ass 4-8 ._...p., 44,.....A;;.:41 .• 1,344,si::::r- ----• - 3 "...OA....- ,....----s-' --- ' " • . . . ..• 1-----) • •-• . . -.... .....,,, ,‘I ,..- N,i 1 '‘. 0.-• ,,,„,<•,2, •,..•„„,,";',4 ,4 4 G ,0210'ik .....,,,.•••.-- IA, • .S.0 41;p• r,..;f-n4.i.:.;ir,.;-o.:- •"•••-,;• 146.:_. .•••••,- - ao.H4-8 .-:----'•.. i%-11.1:;- 1-• . • ts.k,s‘. ...:...- • • • . • '-e--- -,..,...: :---1 :3..• . • • . - • .,..I'l 1.11.4.10.• ••"''''":7..-....-...:•.:--''''"„,-.1.°-• ..fr:$4.11.am4-9 . ••••••, .---} . : u48'i.;.:orkiti.f.0, al.c4 - . .•• • ....1•n'''t ..• \'' .,-•."...• Iti• -,..-..... .*'•'-. i is 1 iiiii- 14144° ' "....• ' C.) 1/1 .-/ I . - • .. .••• ...--- I I <"•••••••'•,--••-,..., •••:•'''• •;. 1 wiligi• ' . • • :!`.:2. ' '-1, ••• • s.;:;:•••••- •- ...awli;e0tVill01 ' ^ '.......- ... •u.64-15 . Ci ( • k.:-.., • i I '' aigailiWg 1 I ° .•. • ,...,. •......: ••• •1117°01./1-1•11,S1 . . .• • ....• r . -•..•..-- Vu.,-"....' lb., r,.•''' ..../,'%V irE Is i '''''''....: /f""•••••• • •'.t. V!••••:•-::''''' %, k)=...,- _...--- „. ., \ 4,r,_<,---- vo.c.571 I ,,i •1 -b.. ,,,,,,7 . oN lc, si s . . p.,- ,...1, , ..,11 ,... • .., ,, A ....,, 0 \ ‘-`/ 1 1 .•., •:-:.,-,-..., • • • .../ Ig* 00 . 1!..'.1611. 1.83-4 ..., 1 Ing.• c. kq .' r) - skill! Vii, : . 0 •__ •. ,.,........--, ,,0 _•••.... ........• talk 13.1101-3 11.0-7 . /2•4; - . ----. ;\, .II 11.13-1 11,13.1 , . 0 .-' .., -•\V.% 4'" , P-1":"*....•:-.:--< ..:,1,1•.•-;L..:..1,• i,,.,I 1 ,Fr----% ............ ..........ii.::._........_._.::::.... ....---.3.7:77:::::::?..... tii,, • i,„ - c..) •._ 0 . '• ..\.0".••4 Agoii,:.. \ \,... , __. .•..._.. .. . . ....... ) - --- - \\ A- .. _ • ..... ..... ___ 'T.'..„ A., -77'77. ..,. ......,-....,.,,,.-..;.-_,•••,r4.,,,+-*-0-,70.7tez. • .7._„.....,,,,_..,__--....,..-,.... -__ . to t.':.:72•• (... • ,.• ..• •. ..... ..• •• •... ,:::•,,,2.,,,\10017,_:..; • ---- „:, , ./..,,,,../.,: 3'2 4,'"*.i-'' '....:.:-"' :. .:;...... --e.r.e."-;-; ..\arH--- ..-'''\111i\ .1 ....' '' l''''' :- - -‘.....,.....:,-; : 1 ...:‘.:/,' 'ir \cll .-. ...god& I i ,/.1.. ,er,... •.. V161 . 1 /. ; T,' . .\ \ • 1, - 1 4..• i p •'-.-'.. • / 1 s SITE, , . " • ,, , ; , „!..,...--,..-.. 7 •.:,:'( ' " s'' 1 el. • • ...orr,"../ .40111r 4, '' ./ 1 / 2--,,,• 1•••';;;;." " , ' . . s , • '‘. ' ' ‘ .."--A \-.... I 1.. . I.• 'p, .... ?) .; • ,,,. ,,., .., . ' •21:4-7 .) ..' •••• :. ,,_. .......0‘••••::, •- lg. ,t•-..7.7...:. l.. . • • ..---"" ...romweuaggs s:Mb a..'116N. • • • . , I: !. , ... , . ( .41 III-- 2416-5 • - • k ' • sotior.E., 1•4 ,....\)//14,1) 100Tw CI 114 • 81,C3-111 ', 11 5-13 10101 . '' ' • .. J , • , ‘/ •, .• 1.14 IC . . . . : ,,. • I! : j' .• . ; l ' :11 • i' !/. .* • . . , • ./ 0 . . f:•••• 11 • i. ; •• . . • •-• /t• 1 • ii • ''.. ,!:1/.. its, . . . ., . , 1 ,.. \ 1.16-4 c:-.) .4'; c•.7.•.-_, '‘, .....• -•••••' l' ‘‘'''' , 1 •-•••••3 L,1 L 1 . .„, t .. . I ..., - , \‘` \. ••••.-- ••••••••-v) ....._ •:,--/ vk., . I 11.4•\ ‘r .• '-') 1 1) ., 1 t, • 1• i s• I ,/;:•••'- ,.:I ., -.... / N." 1 \"" - . •A i i ‘ N\ : .1 j..... , 8 :• '; i• '•) ' 1‘ '•1;. . i • l'r 1 ; • •• • 4L•..,.1 ••,'• ,t 1,,..'ts ; s . ' 19;i': ; :' ‘‘.,.*, • s. • ' ,.••- •• \\ „ \\\ \ • , .•^;-•• e••-•N"--) 1..) 1,°:).2;' • \ ‘../7 ‘t% \ ,/,;•• ‘ I) '')‘, •\•• \• • , \ .. - ;77..7' \S\ '.• 1 I t''''' v\.***•• • •••••••• '1/4, _ ' Itr'\*""'• tt % ,,.•• • '.•,, i ••..„, ., ., , ,,-''7.-,A ...\,,,..,... ,i 1 \L\.:....... •'....‘,„ ....-••••1•,...„ (-----\ , .. )! •.___...,....e) k li., 9/1 4‘ N•4 '•- ,• * -., \•..,. is.. . V'Iv.!..*"---•••‘.1.::._,,_,..........,,-...„.•-' ..,Tr•-..::-... NI,, ••••••4,k••$,,N\ )1 '.. , i ifra1)1 •\, ••• • A • 2%, ....:.••1-; '4-4*. ..s•••••:...''''''''''''''''''''' I q- , .,, • ..• -, \ , . . .. .-f. ..._:., „,, --........-----.„ ,; il„/,/,(/' ...k.t.:5,1 --• '.-. . s...,./.. \:.\\--„,, ,..0.-....7-... i. %. ....,, „• , ,„, , ` • - - .. N.:••,.------...,-.,,,. , , .-„..,,:..i ,•-, , 4 ....:,..--.,..-:........,•••!...:•-,. ..•.v, -.„........,:::...,......„.-w) 4:.. • .)::::...)C:i •ki. ‘...' ill r\ Vv. 1:i.._ -1 , ! ,..• -a ' C5- E • el363 . I • • .., _ ...,c • -"Ii!. • 11.117-3 11 ., . , . ,. .. • ..l •' . • • , ... • . ..... .• s.1 , , i;• . •• iii, : • ..-- -• • \ .., .,....„ -....-.:,...... ,..,.........,.....„, r; ,, ,...7,-,-,, ,,,,..1::•...Z.:•....,.,......,/,' / \ t,. 'ct r. . • 11 .p.;, ., , . . .. . , ,. . ..., , 11171 SW 19 .,.:•It'Ine.:„., . , ,. 1, \ -- ,e• ,,' i ti\ '.,,, -4,-;•44,..... .... ,; . t / \tt •„ 1 ' • ! 1 I • : ,. i' i ''',..../. I;1 / ,.....-../ II: /...- / al ‘ lippp; kk r ....., 1: ftl n• r ' - -,eakc71 ;''k • '1 , • . 'I ..• 'i ' ' tri• 1 . . # . ::„.. ...••• ••' / ,...„,... k.,.7.1 ••• I .... • I. ' • i n ,.. : ; -•,,,, I .\\';'. ' ss •,rol,.--• •, sic.-ei . . , . - • 1 ,i • ,s•" , . . ... ,....... I, • ., : . .• ,..-- / : •• '''- C..1::‘" -- --;;‘ • L.-'x .....C') ; i 1 i - .1 4 .21.C7-16 . 2 21.C7-I) 21.C7- f.7•• e• ) nXti.„ ;:iii . 1 :I i 21,ca21 t • • t; , s . . . .. • • .„. ..... .. • S/ /,•••••--.---..... \•.\..t ,.. . , , .1 :1 .., s: i: . / ,./ • \ s••• • • , i , .• i .• I •s : I ' \ •.. 7 i /..) / i . -•• i :s . .,...' ,•s s• . • - . • %, 1 't :41.C8-20 .• , • •• . .•.' ...1.•!'./ 1 t•1 i ,,.. r',ert, \ V \ r',..• 4/4 1/ ( ; , - 1. tr.. . • •'.... i t I . ..:"'•:'4." ..,:\ I . 1, It .. 4 .4 i r' \ \ , , i: r ' r • ••11 !! / / 1 i ,..: .! k......31! : \ P I -'":'^' ..N\ 1,) ,,,,,,, ., / ..,. I ,. ..7.:-..,,,., • 21.01-19ai 1, .• i'r• :, P .) -.)(1 t •./ \ Nu:1.! ) v!....7..::.,...7.3..........,-.-4; ....„..,.............1 ) ] ! .,ii., • , , , . ...... . .,, : f, -I , . •, ...i ., f' / ,I \:. •• •y i ;: • / ------% 1" ‘. t •:t.„ 1 •• ;, ' `-• • . '‘ ••••• •..• ; /.. i••••‘. ;• 1 i !/f."-"-•?1 ,) . *. ;•-•-••', /"./..... .. •••L ., 1 I i': 1• 1).-1• , '... : -•••*\ I i .,;••..., t‘ \ . / , •.. I , •••••••,, / C., 1 1 \ic ii”I. ' 1 1,-1, i i 1 • ‘ ,,.• • ' " s'' • ' '' ::...../ . •.•i .. ........) ; : • ; %,•,,,,,•,:,:::••:••:.4,.,' . I.: • \ •\ ' \ • tt : II , \ 1 I ..J,..: .. • :11 • ..1 . i i 1 % ' `k. "S. • , s'•>\\\ '''. ,, . . : t , , I, Nt• •••••:•• 'i ! ,1 ;;i: ! ,t i, 1 •••:, , • / , • '-‘. • , , ,/., : , i i I * i 1 .: h,t ',.\\ / 1 ',...:• '. ":-....!'ilte-6 ; st ''' • . • • ...„ \., • , I. . ; 1 i 1 j. 1 •. I - \,..4 ":\-....,_ / ,A i •v, ' V •;'n.01- N. %, i :I . ; 1 1 ;1 t ! ‘.....„..:. / 1• t,.., .,.... \\ I 4. •:,.. -- ...". : 1/4\'..,... \ .\ ( 1 I'• I I ) ; \. f. \,,,N, • „..\`\ ,... I; :, p- '\ ,,, '\''- . Il •/'./ ,. . V ' C - •....• ... s , ••••., • , i \ ••• - , • ! , ei.ce-`7 . ! i 1 ) I i ) 1 ,, .: \\ • , , . ,. ;1 ,,,, ‘1 ; I 1 i ,' , ; , > •., 1,, '‘... • . • I ' ' . • 'il. ',, \ / 1 - ! i , ) 1 t ..-•- i ' ; / : ,/. '' 1 • N ; .: f , \ ' , • t i„;5,. . . • ; I' \.... ..." / . ' r ' •N 'N--I !IS:4\'.\, \,, Ruel I • , vo..-... /„. ,,., l';'' ")... •••\!...:`,. -, ij t••-..,-- ''.--\ \ ',t,' 4\„ ••, ,, ..... : "...\ • , • ,. ..). , • ,,,,,,,., \••-•-• ; ..., •- . ., • „ \\\\ •,........ .. .., I, i/ I l' ., i. It i .. 1,- ---•-•.', ,el `, .‘••• • ,\• •\ - 1 -':.... %.---. (-- •-•':-' - i; - ss, . ' % *: '.k2..-........•••• st.c9- ... ••• ,. _.,... "..... --„••••:...-... ---...,--,--... \ 1 , . ..... 1... •,-..., •..„...........--:.::.:: ,7:::..• .- ,• .• \ , i \ •-•.... i __,„se,-- : -,•,-) ••••... • _! . ....... ..• i 1 ', If\ -!'""'" i r t \ ‘..1% rr i=.•Ir•'' '' . I \ \,.\ .. r. I i: I•,,....,. - 25 T23N 11.4E E 1/2 51-0 IS i\r7 c>„ ,.. T TTILITIES DIVISIONH2 ,71:ai 3/PW TECHNICAL SERVICES Tt, _,-' r A//At Intl GM 011111.•OM Rent='i LAMM; Contour Intervals 041.- -3 tutus ri...--. '•7•try% i nom'.raft_-___ ?EealE3E411° 1s4800 0 G2 ,..,„ II rano% Ilk 41w 44, 4.44,. •,,r --- . . .... , ■1rruti.. • 1 • F2 - 13 T23N R4E E 1/2 ' \ 1 1 n. . 1 \ , 3 .-- Q 1 1 23 24 1 .. _.L kesdate Ave, SW i 2P_-e'_ _� 8' Z6 37 -- 3�, � _.._..- 1 —► 6' _.3._....4--- _ �. _.._—_� 28 27 --- - - --- --- i •21 0 y• 29 • 6 - 6 11 .(1. 1 /e, 7 .. \ 806 77 78 o v 0I a. 20 £�139 LLI H r�.. , 1 76 0 ) (/) 1 8 y 1\ i . N r 1 � . \ 31 ci I,,; 1 N • 40 ¢ t9. z)6' 80472 • 19 . I v� 10 32 6 ° ' 1 ti . 73 8. > ..a� ; r ' N '�, • 805 m‘,, • - ] ..'t,. . •. 141 0' b 1 O 807 . ark s� .3 18 33 . . P _ 1 �r �t�,er V St _ _�f_..•_- e ' wi loth 4 a', _ 1 N1e tr° t, , 3 I SW 3 - -909 "►"r"r"r"r' ~ 1.. ,� ` Co 341 "r" " I i ."r»r"r"r" "r 910 ` 1 -1 1 .12 �b rMr"•'"r"r" 911 -`_.'1 •-Gr°dl _ __ •-•_ � 912 ! !.._, ) .... "r ..", " !�' " .66 - r-/ SW _!8' 47 -1 L- �� ,iv ______.; _----- ...., w. 913 �"TMOMrMr" ....... ; 1 1 '.� 45 f''I.�� F___ t d 1 '�•"ter."r"."r".".w s I `\ .J~ J J'... -a ,S--10.0 S I� 53 q�s 67 _... V� S0 [ . •...-"'"".--.."-- 0....i 4 (i�. 8� 802 803 '.' , I cY _,_. _='=-1_ iOt ��801 �- % �- 70,Ll...._......-.._I-405-...._...__ - _ _____- �...__._..__._._.. . ..___ \ v, __ +� •- N / ��. 43 1 57 58 -i' \,___SW_••1 .„S.t. ...._84__...-.._...-83 ..65:_ ' _ _ _S,W • 87 M, 8' 8' 8' -_8�... / ♦ 24' 59 24' 60 24' 61 24' o-----a-----d • i 82 81 80 ce o i b.)w s \`... , s 1 \\� 3) 1 1 LY •` `` 1 \ • % 809 a-r�5 55 1 904 • 1 ' 810 •.4Or �\ ¢ 811 •t56 j . .�813 � � :. ;�.v. d 1 <\, 903 1.,, • I . 1 ... . -- _'__ Wlth 5 1 't t'\ s c.:\ 1 4 tt t. 1 s 1 • 1 I 1 . I i 9 '. I I It I . , 11 I' •, 901 Y `1\. Y 1 ' • '';': i s _ .. . : .. l w.• ' H2 • 25 T23N R4E E 1/2 S. wG A Q o 400 2 o �' r��oo 4 P/BIPW TECHRIICAL SERVICES4 MM/IM 1 A T7 '21 T ri A10 V 7 iot EXHIBIT 111 DOWNSTREAM MAP . \\ c 1 '/IDS _- A = X- , 1 )1 1111 r 1 �11 I a m x 111� 1 I 1 � x 2 II Z 11 I I I i \ ,1 11 - a c r I Q 41C--- oc 11 ', 1 ;V': OX 1° h I r(i 1 -r, o I ` I i a N / I \ 1 \ - ilk--- 1 0 1 11.111.r. ct JZ $ Z ‘ \\ \ \ k\,,,,,.. 0 6_6 I\ \ ' Iw� i . I I I I \ I ''''...) I I \ \ \ \ 1 I h \\\\\ / i O i: , • 1/\ '� I J --/-----' ;'-' -------'-r.'/--..-- -'. t. I —x xV*111Al i CO.A..) • ..• 1 °API C - til .-Eintir/Adr" • 't ), _---...„4:---- „ rl I 1%,940.0. VP ,c, ilkl• � �7 i 00o I�r �1 �a�r� 1 O- p 1 -MOy 0 t I of" o --i.-- ffi . • \'k I - ;1\ lI r -';'-'-------'1"/-:.-.----... )-:: 1' > 1\\‘\1 Ikk, r___,,_ I \\ \\\\\ ; 6. 1 r_ 1 � �I EE ,t 1 _\ It • - ..I • CO II \ \. 15I 1 1, i\\IL1� IX 11 \ \ ,1 1r L --I ,' ,-__ \-. \ ) \ \...., I ,I i 11\ L1 1 II . 1 \\\‘\\ . 'II-Tr 1\11‘C \\ __------4. 3 „ .a i . 1 \ \. \'------ D--\\' \ r—i-E-Vi=i 1 ii 0 1 \\ • \\'. \ \L—J i--I 1 ! // a , x i or I "I Ist •) s�� \I 1\\ . � -- \) i j j ® i� \`,\ - \ -- iic-- I I d i . . ,c -_--- ----------1\ ,. \\\ \ ( \ . 41\\\ . ri 0 10 F6i_ i .5_, „, x , ____ \‘ . _______t„ il _D'r' lc-------- r \\ x I \\\‘‘ \_....- -- .\\I 1 ii 1 11 �- A h • - \\ ' * I I t‘‘‘ ri: 1 �� �; Ij II��� \\\ ' \� `\ I 1 .II \ .. \ \\ /� `, 1 \ \ ® 1 1 m \ �/� .1 \\ �-- \ / / \ ,\ \ \ i I 1 / f \, \ c: \\ \ , I 0 % --,. \\ 1 \ \ • `\ a :,,,: f,..c..- -"..---- • % c k ‘k - ,,, ..,\ \\\ I 1 ,---- . .- n‘i 1\", ' 7 1\11\1: Os ;. ::• ,,N,.4 ).\\\ \ \ ILI ).\ \ \ I \\ \ 1C U% 0 _ 1„ \ 1 ....-- ) i - % ' 5.. , 0 . \ \\ k\lk I, I I \ s N • % 15) _ fc .) \ �' ` _ \\ \ —\ 10....\ rl \ • - � \ �� / ///44 Is \\ -SO saJJ /,/ �� \ \ AV--- ----7 1 \ \ „ ..:......_ , . ) \ - . o / o .k EXHIBIT H2 OFF-SITE ANALYSIS DRAINAGE SYSTEM TABLE 0 0 41 OFF-SITE ANALYSIS DRAINAGE SYSTEM TABLE Basin: Green River Basin Subbasin Name: Black River Subbasin Number: • Symbol Drainage Component ` Drainage Component Slope Distance Existing Potential Observations of Field Inspector Type, Name, and Size Description from Site Problems Problems Resource Reviewer, or Discharge Resident See Map Type: sheet flow,swale,stream, Drainage basin,vegetation,cover, % Ft Constrictions,under capacity,ponding, Tributary area,likelihood of problem, channel,pipe,pond;size, depth,type of sensitive area,volume overtopping,flooding,habitat or organism overflow pathways,potential impacts diameter, surface area destruction,scouring,bank sloughing, sedimentation,incision,other erosion 1 Channel Flow 1:1 side slopes, dense brush 2%± 0'-520' Low quality Same Well-defined channel, 6'-12' and trees, 6'-8' bottom width water due to depth industrial area 2 15" pipe Bird cage collects channel 1%± 520'-550' None None Entire site flows into U.G. flow into U.G. vault vault 3 15" pipe Flow exits U.G. vault into 1%± 550'-610' None None CB 4 15" pipe Parallel to Oakesdale Avenue 1%± 610'-635' None None S.W. 5 15" pipe Discharges into Black River 1%± 635'-675' None None 6 Black River Flows under I-405 and Grady 1%± 675'-1500' None None Way 6882.010[NJM/sm] EXHIBIT I ASSESSOR'S MAP EXHIBIT J PHOTOGRAPHS , ii , } . l' ' I. , Olk Vt. % 1 , .Iii ' ' .; ' '; 7"..., 1. :' + ' 1i 1 111 `.. .47: 41, ii,, k it Al _ . 4 , I, . I,I 1 0 i 1,)11 , 4 , : , ii 'A f 1 -, 11 i 1 1 is ..14.d. 1 ' . i' it If..44, ,Ciii b i • . t'' 1 , 3 1, I , , . • Ip • : i ; • • a!k 1 1 • , ...i4 $ t i 1# 4 , sw 1G I) a . -it— r •1?, X� 1. .. ' t.i i 1. • A. ' ,'..fi.6 :I .. ' ' t"I,It [• 1� f• 1] I 1.5 1 1 IE.. M .... _— It--.... - X Y — .• PHoTo#2 PHOTOGRAPHS HAV CANDLEWOOD HOTEL -c_ RENTON, WASHINGTON 6882.009[NJ M/sm] I :;.. \ L r ql. .! A �: .fit .fit �`. ,,iri.... ct r Vi.1: 1 .SITE a,T ' ';� 1,'t ;',i f t 4 !11°16411411146111t,'" i i 1 ,,•t ll .1 'HE. , i. ' I ipl .5.11t9 4 1. lit!'" , . . j • •=il, .... », PHOTO#3 4 ,, t. ., • , i I , 71 : I 1, 1L , 1 1�, kl I 1i � , ,lir, ' �'1 .; I 4,� if I,' N, 'i ,t l' ' - • RaiA ir: • Berl L. *e1' - !.. 1 ,ij j }rt . y• - - ,+►" PHOTO#4 PHOTOGRAPHS MAv CANDLEWOOD HOTEL •€ � RENTON, WASHINGTON 6882.009[NJM/sml ./.-7 • e..„-•- gt. - . -- .,,.' ,, ,,.. , ,.. . T4'9' A •11,1..., %-.1.* ' o. • 1 .-sy .'', , : ett osl.. . , - • * 1 . ',N.t •.,4,..;. , 1 1 , , ., i• 4.' %,., s '.1: , ..; lc 1 . N , 1 . I ?•tr., ,.:pt, , ‘.... . • ,•- - -‘t, - • ..- 42 N' . -1-44 ill1/4, * * " 1 ' • ,i.....,1:0"...,`, . 4,41t- 4"leitt; ---X . - ,- ....: All IA fitl-k17-.*-4. — " - ',11i:.-• • - r• IA PSIVEAMA BAC * •If..e- ;nit-1,r, .*44.,• • __,,—, • 'i,,• e -- . ;4,,.,1 i!!;:.'•,.,' ,-.:40. „I, , wr; .40--- ft':• • rt., i . . • Af!.,...,.,, .,k,;1', `, 441:27itet4-4•1 ' • V- , - I DI I I I.1 399 e „ . pH(yr 0#5 ••• i ,,, , 1 ,,: s;... ,tis ;..c:: ,c.!, 1,,i, , ,.,•,. 11/4.• I mop— , . .• i.ii ,, i i I , • , • ' t ‘' ' '.4` -,• ..10. i• - , / h , , 'is,0• • ,, p •• 441P:'t-11•••••rit‘t. • r• . t ir.I.t --,,, . 4 .. . ... / •- .. ..•0. •. `t.4'•41104;Y - • - *--- ''' •' ...• • •*Yr':•-• '•••• 4-• kie-*... *ii • /' '' ' '. • 1.• :',1,r• .*:.-1.', , .:1.- " -'• ,zAr.•• ' • . 00i 4-"..A' - Sit1027'.'.‘. °.tik..; • '.'. '.".A A...7.: s• *. s:..0' •',... .. '' ' .,0 0 1 rE , .' ' •'s; .A1' ' 1 , .1 1 1 ,.. t l',10:141ip, ., — c 111.• * ' -. t • It a. .. . I—'a . ••.•'''.... .r: — :L.; --.. -.' -.. :..6,.. 0'- S17: 4A:...'! 07,S .b'-7,.'!,414..alr90-.SV--.•itiel •Ili'.• - ".ar t!..7.4-,. iiil......-.. ...., .. ,...• ' -Li • ;*. .... '` -.tir: ‘,10,,clit. jt AA-4 1.'" '14•Tor-ot 01"..* -\. • '.P. 4:*Zi-Vil"lia''fstC, IhVf. 07 ,.. * -0 • '''..i. a ai0..'••se -;• ' .,..- --4- ' ' ' —i• 1,.. 0.=• . -,411 ''' .' ,• PHOTO#6 joHAu °Ick 0 CANDLEWOOD HOTEL PHOTOGRAPHS RENTON, WASHINGTON 6882 009[NJM/smi \N*..../.1 s t .. }: ) Js '�.-� r M ,O./ i 1 .0 r f S \:), '.. • ,/.k,-, / . f. 31 Av - tom.: :` Jr L . • •111° �.,,x)„. r ; 6f l S. — PHOTO#8 r+av PHOTOGRAPHS �!�: CANDLEWOOD HOTEL -t =► - RENTON, WASHINGTON 6882.009[NJM/sm] IMF °Iv 7 � • T,GHQ ��r4'. °', � OF 5i7.1= rf i!it0 # ,,,4 i • O ( To �Wn/ ST tir 7-434-6) �, ys sr �-0 AAS r . - lit 4 *giA. , I( 1 . \ . \tli i : . ./.100, /P 11 \' ' 1 C&44 ktifiti f 4 ,I/ � �� w� 1 Ik PHOTO#9 , • j) , _ i /' 's '•_yam_ i; . �i p Z• t r v. 7„,,,i,..4 , -40- i f . !ii : ... . iik , ai) __'ttii. v i ,; LI; •i ,, ;, ,O '// v ♦ 1 AA j „ w -.'''' -A: ./.1 '''00j.'''''0‘.--r',;1`.-, ir ..., �`'- •rye .;. + .. II- I , • a�:- ; `i 1 kV— / ( ;,,•. ' f z•/1): ''' '..,," :71- '1,\\ • - - - , -- PHOTO#10 PHOTOGRAPHS Au m,. CANDLEWOOD HOTEL RENTON, WASHINGTON 6852 009[N1M/sm] . , , • • * • le 7 • .- :- ' l•-•,r-4 .r.:, „, ..: .d 1 , • -!"- . .. ', i0-7$4, , ..1?".91y.,11•...)1*-54',.N.. . • , •"` ', •k ‘41„ . i ,•1Ali • ,.. . • t 1 ,v....-. ,4-t, v / , •• , . •... .„4.1 .• N .,•-• .. . . •• - -' - r".. 0- ' " • ,-4i1,-•-p ...' .; 4, -. • • ‘. ...•,., --•.,4„ . 4> , .-.4 • ,k,.. t, .• - •o. ( , v ..• -!:: ... ...::,• : ,...t. • • • , Ir. ',1 - e . • i' . ' ' • i . ''s' . • .- 1'.A.,‘,V.V. ''P•Nk• • • /- ,,t !j !''l• .1 fta„, ,. k:.,..),.•,....., \,,, -). . V 3A, • . ....b.. ,...via.,..ict:.r..401 .! ..f, iiiiolch,i,.,iLi.v..... ' ' i'''7`.--,- '' ;kfill,*:.-ie.•&'•'A 4 .•'..c";-:- :, . ,. !i) ,,,,.,-, ,. t...'4,--... viii`,...• - -- •41.:: •••••-Vet 4. - '' ' ' ' • 1 - .1 4,:\....";--Ji'llA.1...P.,* • ,, . ' - 4 ? ,. 1.g. . - ,ok,' ..• ;'' .-.`, ..- : ',.4',Ii.-; . Zfr •,444,.p., ,,,...tdi.104;:•lae • ./.,‘ ,'.'doP 6' II . ' I• ‘; ,,A.„K z_ffirt fl. -,:t11- .t• .4'O.* 44,,..:/• - • IS. ,4, 4, .v..i„.. .. ..,..r . ' i. . ..,. .ir- r. ••":1..,"11-•• ' .4.. , ... 1... .•t ''./...t..-4 e:•• .' ' .:-it:i-4 • \Ad .• -.7:- • ' 1 . - . -...L•• ,-.. -,.;,, -ir, • -; , ,.;•.. ./..1,..,: • ;‘, .i.,1 . - , , • •v•-•--.7._ -* •A„. ..,.,..... .. _, , - ,- -• .. ' - •lie' 1"-: 4 •'• ;)i. •••l''r..# . ,,,t- •-•-.: i•„.'p,,y.".'•,.,-1..-1,-::t:••.'/;r...'-.:-,••-,7•;.,.,,.•.,.,1.1,,4)1F.1.,.,-:„,,r•- . .,•..1,) ,I..-.•.4.I,_.:,.;,•Nv•.•-,t o 4.:.•.I-..1•i sI i,N p,.,a7;1!b....r.-•.-.-4(-,f.i.'4.•l.t•0.b".i,?--l-%.••ik'e s•„e.-..,,• t,r„j..•..-F_.An‘ .w1i /, • i ; ,: i N % , -.-4 , - . •i4.l.%.i •a 3.t,•..,., ., l., • e I . .1114.1%.'.•41 N • , • it '... ...' .• / . • 44. 4 . 4r, 4 ,,..V - i.... s - -......, - ii . - - `,.., ....-t6,447. - t.di .....0,41•:* Z41r* . ' - ..,' 4//A a -01, • e, ...____ ,. ,,..., ... ..... , "NI: •• • -41,'•• ' ..0• ,.N,e' -- r 14", . • -* , - 4".....r. . • _ . Ado, -:. . .4... _ --0 '. .. ... 1011"4101,4"- PHOTO#11 Air.....•11r.- -se 'itt • • ' ' 1..• • 60, ..- .• '''. • ' N. ' • •t .`• ii - - -..--*... - , **__:-. ..,. . 1?)1Z,k,i, 1011A - . `".. • ,.. ..,t- " glimp ."-• ' 0 \'''''‘141.-T • - 7,..-4,..•. .0, 6......7 44.4111111111111111 44. tif i .44 , r. reb. ir.11"rxNelr - , 1 't ‘ -.a...,--•••••••., •••C ' 441:44i2/141: 4• . t-,,,.. .141 ' ;.•';'"' •:11. ••-' ' , ••.: •;",-;• ' , . ; , 1111.111111 - PHOTO#12 I._ PHOTOGRAPHS arplik(, iA44,‘, CANDLEWOOD HOTEL RENTON, WASHINGTON 6882.009[191Mismi 'Ioamm," ., r f 22 .....b... ' J / T- . • t 'r� : • .._ . ...r•�,,,�... •ti . ;sit 4 • - • � �l a� y �»- . �r, -'vim.., i•' f.,�r�r• •44.4.4, Illkit.... .. • I♦ -r.' •' - _ ♦ i-.. i PHOTO#14 MA PHOTOGRAPHS CANDLEWOOD HOTEL RENTON, WASHINGTON ea82.00v[NJMlamj �'• a./ . ,�.• •• `.• l'4. ... . yy� t • .l Fii ,' , l A„ "'1' i y e. �„il V l I • T'. , ,a. „;, ..0 , • A,.S. Y 2 . .' . �'_ 4 -- PHOTO#15 , FLOW DI SGM A.LefES .M '. - 4 ,. % . Nam. - ,4 ' a p 4A #4. A __ . .., ... : .., 1....• ,..7„, LI PHOTO#16 _-- __-- PHOTOGRAPHS wit, CANDLEWOOD HOTEL =` RENTON, WASHINGTON 6882.009INJM/sml 11 L ! '' ' '•'' . 444 1 • • ... •• 4 1 VI , ; , • • & t.'t .7, i , , ''' •. t4, •• ': ” , 048' • • ; -, - • , 1 • • • ; , r. ,) :..,', • ...,- • . • ( ., . . •,•• , 6:: ' r AA!.. al-A '' •r 1 f / • '4':1 -•'• • ', • ., - .r.....• 1.1 . . ' •': ,le • '' : -f•-; ' 14.-•41. ' ..11188.- 7 7 . . •••••••41.4....'; :' . .... .:., kV p_ 4.94 . .. ... i .,. , : ...!,,,,.; - 0,.vflht. t . * , ,'..k 0. .• ..• ', ' 4..V, sif . .• • f'.. ..-' 1-' ... .--‘. icAr,`,1 .;,. ; - -: $01 itr;• 1 . ' '11A-41, -- .... •.. '% -1'. • .. ' Zarbo_ • -.-<,...1.44i- .‘_,,- • ,..- . • , , -'S-- •-'• • ' - 4 .. • - 1 • . fv,I.-4-4t. - ...1,- - .-- 1' .44,-*:-.. .,.. tt...,.. le ' .,'. -,• :, . ' . _...,,,.• • Lk Mit ''.-n.y. -.•; . '..,.• 4 -,.. ••• • . •Lii • . - . , , , '. •.i• 4,''Illw ' . .. Pi° • , 1 • - A. .. . * . , 'I••• . - •- l'• .. . lb • ... •441' , . . -., JP - . i. • ,..• la r ' *." •lict I 71/1*1 a, 41 e..... — s • •... ' ''', .-'44:- .1.`:111!...X It71.4.'- ••• '- II. .• 1 * '''• .• .• 'Ili'7...1. .... '. • . • •-- .- .:. - .. •.' ..1 • ‘..0 ' '. i iftipAr-,• % ...A . 1 r, . ,..'• , -...: ,,)••••• -. . ,...p. .. "...;„iila 1., . _ • '.. 21-..... -,; f7. tert7 . -•'...' ; _r • .c.- ?sit: 1 / PHOTO#18 PHOTOGRAPHS 4: 0.04.k.4V. CANDLEWOOD HOTEL RENTON, WASHINGTON 6882.009(NJ/Wont Ilh1/43/447f...0100" DETENTION ANALYSIS&DESI(P4 4.0 RETENTION/DETENTION ANALYSIS AND DESIGN The proposed project's combined wet pond/detention pond is sized in accordance with the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual. The flow control requirement is to match the post-developed flow with the pre-developed flow for the 2-year and 10-year storm events, with a 30 percent volume increase. The water quality requirements are to treat one-third of the developed 2-year flow. The pre-developed 2-year and 10-year flows are .13 cfs and .31 cfs, respectively. WaterWorks 4®was used to size the combined wet pond/detention pond. The maximum surface water elevation for the proposed pond is 14.77 feet. Additional storage is provided above the maximum water surface elevation of 14.77 up to 16.58. This additional storage is determined to be compensation for the floodplain storage. The volume required for the detention pond is 14,688 cubic feet. Volume provided is 17,600 cubic feet. The existing volume for flood storage was calculated by Earthcalc,Inc. The existing volume is equal to 80,379 cubic feet below elevation 16.58 for the entire pre-developed site. The proposed total storage capacity is 102,006 cubic feet. This includes detention volume that has been provided. The detention volume requires 17,600 cubic feet of storage. The remaining volume provided is 4,027 cubic feet. 6882.008 [NJM/jss/sm/ph] KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL FIGURE 3.5.1C 2-YEAR 24-HOUR ISOPLUVIALS E:`,11;06' --,:-..4 . '- i ri ii , -a 'l 1 t i i it • ri �� -is A - rl 1. Ad s.!%:maga 1 ' --. i ''' ;/ .Cl!k —� ��` `.)-.7 •• :-.11471111, 1 ii.. -41 4- .5.-- 4 if,...- ...; -Ai .-- . joi 2 E !t, I' • ,, !i/1‘ lir\ ni �`- m aw !.\jJ „„ l ..�,. ���rwir /1, *RilLg.M1P1.-1 ./116.44a1 ," flalf • . A Iii _ ...,ilf 4`ir.,, / 1 ., •40_40 : Tate,' , , , — Irrliff ., _ .. iiipTosiV,==.1,----- -7--Agovin-i, : "16* l' Pe -I` '' - .'N.-.111' 4501i,r_APIrmag....wom - . , ..., Island t - •--AMP:40 .7016... -1.1.:L \ iiillitilikva• .__N\- :'.•. ,,,te.„...,, , ,.....,,, .. - "IV ...,iiip,‘, itte , - -41111,1„, , 7-, 'IS ,A1 7.• \\1/4, ' 7. ----44;...., _ t' /4 I . mink t\- R., _NIIONNN.:., , No.ogor . NIt14. :: . --..11,11104:Itt,A 14110110M1/4N-N 11111(4\W j j I �:ateA'10111 �. c r �-* • • --4‘ \ .l ' ik amrittli �! )I -: f r:- ,...„•-- tii Ire -- ... ...A , -= i 1- " 4 PI! (24:'— A 1%‘‘ d- 'Ps ....... se) III �-..� �- � Villi .4 \ �, ta - APB� - - � F 1 N 1:Alr. "VI ,---- INV Wit r .\ 4 Ail OIL ilinsOMIVA 14 . _,, 14 .111 _ '7'2 .-- p As . ,....... _ ....., Ai Ple, .1 - \-- 011. 1 _ .._ 1. Adtipir 11114 .: ---... ,450-,744,4104, f • ) ,.,, k.‘ Iffir_., :; , . , . tir _____,.._, ev . ._...„._-_,.7___---.i. .J_._._.:_ hail 1 i i . . EWA .: VAVAVANIII( _ , 2-YEAR 24-HOUR PRECIPITATION 1 ltrag` I �S -2011101 "1""" ISOPLUVIALS OF 2-YEAR 24-HOUR ry • ,'g AMP A � APP 3 . TOTAL PRECIPITATION IN INCHES ry niVi _liirNit- G 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 M11s , . c I. o Cli ` 4 1:300,000 3.5.1-8 00 4 • KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL FIGURE 3.5.1E 10-YEAR 24-HOU•` SOPLUVIALS - '22_ '� •11. ,.�0,,• /a M, . , i ` Duak., , \ - dali ?. rirl'e 4 IN,..),10 6.. r 24 { .- --- _ lir 411. rour.4 -.or ,I: - 0 k"‘''' i —`\ ,• ANNE II ;-.t-\--- -: ,„i 11 1 Iti 116j11*** 29 •\ -.i Itire43*'- " . ' ' sic; driFJPA. . ..dilk , e ili Z• -. ao , - \ - 6:11,10E- —itwitow-OP -v„,- ' 111 . -..,41P4A, .,..,--,., .. . ,..•,_..atboo-at-Ii. • ‘ .." e''..„ :44'!-Sill ., — 71 imilmillill—firillt A 11111, i ar: i a, s•!..A3.11! . 'Ir.. , . ...,. . . st •.i . -1 . , • ,,4 „gin . , . al il:( A 111 --1, '4" vit'-',-* Aim -m. ihmai#14A1111&%041A " 1- eirlka ' ',7e5T a ' ) `NIP...4001.r. i gb%,-- .0,4 ., t, -.E:, leditk 1 ', _ ins , ..... ..... , . , .2,... N.,,,,,,,,,,ii,,,, . ,. . .- ,, ,,,..,, 4\ 6. - _ Itgoixi,,, ; N.:wig 1 -N• .: , \ , ,,,A. ...„ , . i, - iiiiffir'N'AA 11P,ALAN"w9c."".. ' 4 • • i ,,47__ i, „jib ,,,...,.... awiii#4,14p-0,771r4W, i. ilrIl Atihrtglig umii / ;-- \it \ -.: ---- bVININI: % '''‘ . mill 1 , r.., _ „......, la ) ilit A - . . . _ • r , _., , ..); , , „,, .,..• _. , r gyve -si .*, , ,..1., "ItAi.L. , - . • _-- ........, , ,,, ,.. . , , „ •''I ( reial - ‘11 ,._.--, l' l' .......... W. • ....\.c..\ ( /_ ____"S11111h 041111111rIall ; Li% \ i Irillitill WWI '' \'''. iiilhaiiiiiiiitg iibikVW.Allir Atillrit • / MIES rp, ...11 , ,v. AIN. .„, k ,. ;rip- • iii.,./191 , ., . ,. \. , „,.. . ,. hvi .. ..0, A . 2 lrinfirPOIR )-YEAR'24-HOUR PRECIPITATION �� , MtaPA1Pm" 3.4 ISOPLUVIALS OF 10-YEAR 24-HOUR ��f I%4r , TOTAL PRECIPITATION IN INCHES �y0 L. - iir 3b "kr- O 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Miles �w - a J kI. is 300,000 3.5.1-10 :7 DI 1/90 40 KING COUNTY, WASHcINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL ►URE 3.5.1H 100-YEAR 24-HOUR ISOPLUVIALS �3'0�-- •.,- op i,,� tea- ='=--- -- --- - - -T ------- --- oka r .c N!._.I.,,Jil. tl- ,_•i .--. . _. -- m1Ti4 iiv 3 q6 3 AW i,‘o,aIirTRb in,Arr4o N)i itr ft W,_ kfi;iv .<- 4, ems.,.... � tigar some, -FT_I,_ . . 7:4* II 111 .,.. ack -\ N r. 43 N-1/424kOkaNtilt- vtlik.-411FrsiLehisiv i co '! .. At 7\ - l'irtl -r"." (P '-' 'Aiit12' An` '%qt, --a tirk., :Jii.Atege° mov.:7-..e.,.. ---- --.... 1 .,...,. .1k =look ..k ii\N\11 ,- Itorr-„,4frvipp.... .,: zo), v Is --0 % :00._. ... , ft r ((t•titaikeigst, , i 41 Ta-"as ' i . t " 11. 4-Aw4,0•4 ,-_-.6.-- A ./ ,410110,1 frii iv 1,411„.,1/4, ,No...,,,witi. .„. - ,,,44.# _ in, Ait,:k . _.---_,t,,,„„.._,_ \, „ r wW,"lir ' I N 516 oig b.- w. - wiit*--,, . . , N.:,:i -v...1 . ' =! i'1 • . Ill kig&1/4 411100310trt * fOlf -14 Y 111-- 1\_ Illtricittit\,_ ,APVION,t; Vol& \ ii.; , f IA ° '':-. ' ' AIR lealbek Q-z.. ,;:.\\.,‘‘', 1,::4_4" ` :. -:,:_.:1 ( :,-9111N‘ C.---. 1 1 *.ip An 1 ai. to, . ,0147".• .14 I! 1' Ti_..., i :. R! itir4 i igos, -,_ , • , liwilibwratireittirso,14, ,,, ...o• 1./ , ... writ _ &loot 3411 4 — / \7-'' -J-- . '' •\ 40,2W6111141 Allmoupusivw 4 , ,..(--2 i tio _ .-.--,•, it .\.v- FLEFir 0.,,r4.,„\c;.=NI: 7.W46 AI 1 kVii - • .‘, . w 4 .„4, :.. st ,imilio ,,,47, L.• tlie - mew- . -..,,,AdipAfoor i . 07 ___,j .4 % 1; ili. r - .,,1 --i , , to: oto, � ate. _, , 4. 0- -"EAR 24-HOUR PRECIPITATION WEERIP1111 ••.,, 6•5 3. . — ISOPLUVIALS OF 100-YEAR 24-HOUR D� �,� �� TOTAL PRECIPITATION IN INCHES t ' �-��( liir 5•.5 O,• O 3 4 5 6 7 8MIIes t* ��_ -.; 1:300.000 3.5.1-13 �O •T��^- 1/90 EXHIBIT K WET POND CALCULATIONS 3/1/99 5: 32 : 38 am Shareware Release page 1 CANDLEWOOD HOTEL WATER QUALITY TREATMENT BCE#6882 , FILE: 6882 .BSN BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: G NAME: 1/3 2YR/24HR DEVELOPED SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 2 . 91 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0. 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 0. 67 inches AREA. . : 1. 79 Acres 1. 12 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10. 00 min CN • 98 . 00 86. 00 TC • 6. 30 min 6. 30 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0. 20 TcReach - Sheet L: 300. 00 ns: 0. 4000 p2yr: 2 . 00 s: 0. 0100 TcReach - Shallow L: 180. 00 ks: 5. 00 s: 0. 0217 impTcReach - Sheet L: 40. 00 ns: 0. 1500 p2yr: 2 . 00 s: 0. 0150 PEAK RATE: 0. 20 cfs VOL: 0. 08 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min EXHIBIT L DETENTION POND CALCULATIONS 2/25/99 11: 29 : 33 am Shareware Release page 1 CANDLEWOOD HOTEL DETENTION POND CALCULATIONS BCE#6882 , FILE: 6882 .BSN BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: A NAME: 2YR/24HR PRE-DEVELOPED SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 2 . 91 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0. 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 2 . 00 inches AREA. . : 2 . 91 Acres 0. 00 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10. 00 min CN • 81. 00 0. 00 TC • 90. 39 min 0. 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0. 20 TcReach - Sheet L: 300. 00 ns: 0. 4000 p2yr: 2 . 00 s: 0. 0100 TcReach - Shallow L: 180. 00 ks: 5. 00 s: 0. 0217 PEAK RATE: 0. 13 cfs VOL: 0. 15 Ac-ft TIME: 550 min BASIN ID: B NAME: 10YR/24HR PRE-DEVELOPED SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 2 . 91 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0. 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 2 . 90 inches AREA. . : 2 . 91 Acres 0. 00 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10. 00 min CN • 81. 00 0. 00 TC • 90. 39 min 0. 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0. 20 TcReach - Sheet L: 300. 00 ns: 0. 4000 p2yr: 2 . 00 s: 0. 0100 TcReach - Shallow L: 180. 00 ks: 5. 00 s: 0. 0217 PEAK RATE: 0. 31 cfs VOL: 0. 30 Ac-ft TIME: 540 min BASIN ID: C NAME: 100YR/24HR PRE-DEVELOPED SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 2 .91 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0. 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 3 . 90 inches AREA. . : 2 . 91 Acres 0. 00 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10. 00 min CN • 81. 00 0. 00 TC • 90. 39 min 0. 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0. 20 TcReach - Sheet L: 300. 00 ns: 0. 4000 p2yr: 2 . 00 s: 0 . 0100 TcReach - Shallow L: 180. 00 ks: 5. 00 s: 0. 0217 PEAK RATE: 0. 56 cfs VOL: 0. 49 Ac-ft TIME: 540 min 2/25/99 11: 29: 33 am Shareware Release page 2 CANDLEWOOD HOTEL DETENTION POND CALCULATIONS BCE#6882 , FILE: 6882 .BSN BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: D NAME: 2YR/24HR DEVELOPED SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 2 . 91 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0. 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 2 . 00 inches AREA. . : 1. 79 Acres 1. 12 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10. 00 min CN - 98 . 00 86. 00 TC • 6. 30 min 6. 30 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 . 20 TcReach - Sheet L: 300. 00 ns: 0. 4000 p2yr: 2 . 00 s: 0. 0100 TcReach - Shallow L: 180. 00 ks: 5. 00 s: 0. 0217 impTcReach - Sheet L: 40. 00 ns: 0 . 1500 p2yr: 2 . 00 s: 0. 0150 PEAK RATE: 0. 91 cfs VOL: 0. 34 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min BASIN ID: E NAME: 10YR/24HR DEVELOPED SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 2 . 91 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0. 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 2 . 90 inches AREA. . : 1. 79 Acres 1. 12 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10. 00 min CN • 98 . 00 86. 00 TC • 6 . 30 min 6. 30 mine ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0. 20 TcReach - Sheet L: 300. 00 ns: 0. 4000 p2yr: 2 . 00 s: 0. 0100 TcReach - Shallow L: 180. 00 ks: 5. 00 s: 0. 0217 impTcReach - Sheet L: 40. 00 ns: 0. 1500 p2yr: 2 . 00 s: 0. 0150 PEAK RATE: 1. 46 cfs VOL: 0. 55 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min BASIN ID: F NAME: 100YR/24HR DEVELOPED SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 2 . 91 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0. 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 3 . 90 inches AREA. . : 1. 79 Acres 1. 12 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10. 00 min CN • 98 . 00 86. 00 TC 6. 30 min 6. 30 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0. 20 TcReach - Sheet L: 300. 00 ns: 0. 4000 p2yr: 2 . 00 s: 0. 0100 TcReach - Shallow L: 180. 00 ks: 5 . 00 s: 0 . 0217 impTcReach - Sheet L: 40. 00 ns: 0. 1500 p2yr: 2 . 00 s: 0. 0150 PEAK RATE: 2 . 08 cfs VOL: 0. 78 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min 2/25/99 11: 29 : 33 am Shareware Release page 4 CANDLEWOOD HOTEL DETENTION POND CALCULATIONS BCE#6882 , FILE: 6882 .BSN HYDROGRAPH SUMMARY PEAK TIME VOLUME HYD RUNOFF OF OF Contrib NUM RATE PEAK HYDRO Area cfs min. cf\AcFt Acres 1 0. 126 1330 14724 cf 2 . 91 2 0. 302 790 23333 cf 2 . 91 3 0. 403 800 31300 cf 2 . 91 2/25/99 11: 29 : 34 am Shareware Release page 5 CANDLEWOOD HOTEL DETENTION POND CALCULATIONS BCE#6882 , FILE: 6882 . BSN STORAGE STRUCTURE LIST STORAGE LIST ID No. 1 Description: DETENTION POND STORAGE LIST ID No. 2 Description: DETENTION POND+30% 2/25/99 11: 29 : 34 am Shareware Release page 6 CANDLEWOOD HOTEL DETENTION POND CALCULATIONS BCE#6882 , FILE: 6882 .BSN STAGE STORAGE TABLE CUSTOM STORAGE ID No. 1 Description: DETENTION POND STAGE <----STORAGE----> STAGE <----STORAGE----> STAGE <----STORAGE----> STAGE <----STORAGE----> (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- 13.00 0.0000 0.0000 13.80 4419 0.1015 14.60 9531 0.2188 15.40 15276 0.3507 13.10 552.40 0.0127 13.90 4972 0.1141 14.70 10199 0.2341 15.50 16044 0.3683 13.20 1105 0.0254 14.00 5524 0.1268 14.80 10866 0.2495 15.60 16812 0.3860 13.30 1657 0.0380 14.10 6192 0.1421 14.90 11534 0.2648 U.70 17581 0.4036 13.40 2210 0.0507 14.20 6860 0.1575 15.00 12202 0.2801 15.80 18349 0.4212 13.50 2762 0.0634 14.30 7527 0.1728 15.10 12970 0.2978 15.90 19118 0.4389 13.60 3314 0.0761 14.40 8195 0.1881 15.20 13739 0.3154 16.00 19886 0.4565 13.70 3867 0.0888 14.50 8863 0.2035 15.30 14507 0.3330 2/25/99 11: 29 : 34 am Shareware Release page 7 CANDLEWOOD HOTEL DETENTION POND CALCULATIONS BCE#6882 , FILE: 6882 .BSN STAGE STORAGE TABLE CUSTOM STORAGE ID No. 2 Description: DETENTION POND+30% STAGE <----STORAGE----> STAGE <----STORAGE----> STAGE <----STORAGE----> STAGE <----STORAGE----> (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- 13.00 0.0000 0.0000 13.80 6137 0.1409 14.60 13111 0.3010 15.40 20835 0.4783 13.10 767.10 0.0176 13.90 6904 0.1585 14.70 14017 0.3218 15.50 21860 0.5018 13.20 1534 0.0352 14.00 7671 0.1761 14.80 14924 0.3426 15.60 22884 0.5253 13.30 2301 0.0528 14.10 8578 0.1969 14.90 15830 0.3634 15.70 23909 0.5489 13.40 3068 0.0704 14.20 9484 0.2177 15.00 16737 0.3842 15.80 24933 0.5724 13.50 3836 0.0881 14.30 10391 0.2385 15.10 17762 0.4077 15.90 25958 0.5959 13.60 4603 0.1057 14.40 11297 0.2594 15.20 18786 0.4313 16.00 26982 0.6194 13.70 5370 0.1233 14.50 12204 0.2802 15.30 19811 0.4548 2/25/99 11: 29 : 34 am Shareware Release page 8 CANDLEWOOD HOTEL DETENTION POND CALCULATIONS BCE#6882 , FILE: 6882 .BSN DISCHARGE STRUCTURE LIST MULTIPLE ORIFICE ID No. 1 Description: ORIFICE Outlet Elev: 13 . 00 Elev: 11. 00 ft Orifice Diameter: 2 . 0332 in. NOTCH WEIR ID No. 2 Description: NOTCH WEIR Weir Length: 0. 3000 ft. Weir height (p) : 1. 2500 ft. Elevation 14 . 25 ft. Weir Increm: 0. 10 COMBINATION DISCHARGE ID No. 3 Description: COMBINED NOTCH/ORIFICE _. Structure: 1 Structure: Structure: 2 Structure: Structure: 2/25/99 11: 29 : 34 am Shareware Release page 9 CANDLEWOOD HOTEL DETENTION POND CALCULATIONS BCE#6882 , FILE: 6882 .BSN STAGE DISCHARGE TABLE MULTIPLE ORIFICE ID No. 1 Description: ORIFICE Outlet Elev: 13 . 00 Elev: 11. 00 ft Orifice Diameter: 2 . 0332 in. STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> (ft) ---cfs (ft) ---cfs (ft) ---cfs (ft) ---cfs 13.00 0.0000 13.80 0.1003 14.60 0.1419 15.40 0.1738 13.10 0.0355 13.90 0.1064 14.70 0.1463 15.50 0.1774 13.20 0.0502 14.00 0.1122 14.80 0.1505 15.60 0.1809 13.30 0.0614 14.10 0.1177 14.90 0.1546 15.70 0.1843 13.40 0.0710 14.20 0.1229 15.00 0.1586 15.80 0.1877 13.50 0.0793 14.30 0.1279 15.10 0.1626 15.90 0.1910 13.60 0.0869 14.40 0.1327 15.20 0.1664 16.00 0.1943 13.70 0.0939 14.50 0.1374 15.30 0.1701 2/25/99 11: 29 : 34 am Shareware Release page 10 CANDLEWOOD HOTEL DETENTION POND CALCULATIONS BCE#6882 , FILE: 6882 .BSN STAGE DISCHARGE TABLE NOTCH WEIR ID No. 2 Description: NOTCH WEIR Weir Length: 0. 3000 ft. Weir height (p) : 1. 2500 ft. Elevation 14 . 25 ft. Weir Increm: 0. 10 STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> (ft) ---cfs (ft) ---cfs (ft) ---cfs (ft) ---cfs 14.25 0.0000 14.60 0.1611 15.00 0.3420 15.40 0.3141 14.30 0.0107 14.70 0.2164 15.10 0.3608 15.50 0.2564 14.40 0.0520 14.80 0.2671 15.20 0.3640 14.50 0.1047 14.90 0.3098 15.30 0.3492 2/25/99 11: 29 : 34 am Shareware Release page 11 CANDLEWOOD HOTEL DETENTION POND CALCULATIONS BCE#6882 , FILE: 6882 . BSN STAGE DISCHARGE TABLE COMBINATION DISCHARGE ID No. 3 Description: COMBINED NOTCH/ORIFICE Structure: 1 Structure: Structure: 2 Structure: Structure: STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> (ft) ---cfs (ft) ---cfs (ft) ---cfs (ft) ---cfs 13.00 0.0000 13.80 0.1003 14.60 0.3030 15.40 0.4878 13.10 0.0355 13.90 0.1064 14.70 0.3627 15.50 0.4338 13.20 0.0502 14.00 0.1122 14.80 0.4176 15.60 0.3551 13.30 0.0614 14.10 0.1177 14.90 0.4645 15.70 0.2495 13.40 0.0710 14.20 0.1229 15.00 0.5006 15.80 0.1877 13.50 0.0793 14.30 0.1386 15.10 0.5234 15.90 0.1910 13.60 0.0869 14.40 0.1848 15.20 0.5304 16.00 0.1943 13.70 0.0939 14.50 0.2421 15.30 0.5193 2/25/99 11: 29 : 35 am Shareware Release page 12 CANDLEWOOD HOTEL DETENTION POND CALCULATIONS BCE#6882 , FILE: 6882 .BSN LEVEL POOL TABLE SUMMARY MATCH INFLOW -STO- -DIS- <-PEAK-> OUTFLOW STORAGE DESCRIPTION > (cfs) (cfs) --id- --id- <-STAGE> id (cfs) VOL (cf) 2YR/24HR ROUTING 0.13 0.91 1 1 14.25 1 0.13 7218.17 cf 10YR/24HR ROUTING 0.31 1.46 1 3 14.60 2 0.30 9524.40 cf 100YR/24YR + 30% 0.56 2.08 2 3 14.77 3 0.40 14687.69 cf SYSTEM DESIGN& I il 0 5.0 CONVEYANCE SYSTEM DESIGN AND ANALYSIS The storm drainage conveyance system is designed for the 25-year/24-hour storm event, based on the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual criteria. A backwater analysis was performed to verify that all the runoff for the 100-year/24-hour storm event will be maintained with no overtopping of any structure. Please refer to the following calculations in Exhibit "I." 6882.008 [NJM/jss/sm/ph] KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL FIGURE 3.5.1F 25-YEAR 24-HOUR ISOPLUVIAIS - 1_ .S.6s •\-..- - - V--I ii.iPta m- '.,. - ' , 1;:'3'e ` 'pit i ' /I ,, i) .-. ��.... _ .i '( "� 'tea... , ,w J '� 30 = ' 31 1%) 4.- -'-- 4 IT . _1,,---- 3.3 •arej.w.;wry- 1-- 1 ii , l' j teklp ( • - Otte - t ... _ ills, - Altpglig l I N.vitifirtab,-;. via`i'lliiigftrii_b_rilaslaIMIWN-_____*lif c") m 142010-411 `'mil: AP .45t '-f '°A.Ntsli, ) Iir i • . �,fit+ ii .114, Vigell 4°0.101' 401rgrigFAMO-0,44 •, , er "el 4, a�. f'`�. '; '�ff,, -- �E 7 � � � �.1 lik 11\elirf'. ----°1111(4111411.411111k- �`,v -. 1010111;14 \ ,, .---t ' al,talt.,:kNi , 14:41/41*._i 4* t igitrA illi 1‘17‘t t 4 I 9 - % WITNI ibilt0r4' przik k-writ; • txi , --.4\8Sou ii . -.1.. ' ,J--- -4,;,- A •inTliit C:-- -N • . (1,- * 'Nt / I ‘ : 1 \ - ..k \ •-al *Maw.a r --- '. , \."...46' Vcilkilik 1 i. s . % ._ ',, ''az.Uri :, \ , -, -. x., k 7 _illir, j• i 1"-----,.---* :- OR -N.:111,_I , , ,' -- imest : _..v. ihili ilk _ 1 ' - - ,- ,AL.,„ ,. , , rframlil 11- - ,,,,,,a VAIN, v.i I.. \ ...._ , —, . ,__ . ,.--".-6- r...`A e.lfI.iW1 , P'ir, e1 i-1lrkaPIii,w jg l m �_ -- U ..1t' •_,e ii5 u 1-‘=p-o IiMF '.%, '41 J1114I•1, i.m 1 d--04 h,1.I_ l,ii G i.r. 'mot :- - V � �51F� l.. �_4 'i 4 o� M ••.., s 25-YEAR 24-HOUR PRECIPITATION �. iitTlnr' s 2 -H R WWl"4 Ste• ISOPLUVIALS OF 25-YEAR 4 OU +//� r' TOTAL PRECIPITATION IN INCHES 6 /� - 4$ 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 e Mll•s nJ. �� �. -.,� 3.5.1-11 O - 1:300,000 �• t`• - 1/90 EXHIBIT M CONVEYANCE SYSTEM CALCULATIONS PI BARGHAUSEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS-PIPE FLOW CALCULATOR using the Rational Method& Manning Formula KING COUNTY DESIGN FOR 25 YEAR STORM JOB NAME:CandleWood Hotel NOTE: ENTER DEFAULTS AND STORM DATA BEFORE BEGINNING JOB#: 6882 DEFAULTS C= 0.9 n= 0.013 REVISED: d= 12 Tc= 6.3 A= Contributing Area (Ac) Qd= Design Flow(cfs) COEFFICIENTS FOR THE RATIONAL METHOD"Ir"-EQUATION C= Runoff Coefficient Qf= Full Capacity Flow(cis) STORM Ar Br Tc= Time of Concentration(min) Vd= Velocity at Design Flow(fps) 2YR 1.58 0.58 I= Intensity at Tc (in/hr) Vf= Velocity at Full Flow (fps) 10YR ,2.44 0.64 PRECIP= 3.4 d= Diameter of Pipe (in) s= Slope of pipe(%) 25YR 2.66 0.65 Ar= 2.66 L= Length of Pipe (it) n= Manning Roughness Coefficient 50YR 2.75 0.65 Br= 0.65 D= Water Depth at Qd (in) Tt= Travel Time at Vd (min) 100YR 2.61 0.63 FROM TO A s I. d Tc n C SUM A A'C SUM A•C I Qd Qf Qd/Qf D/d D Vf Vd Tt CB1 CB2 0.21 0.50 159 8 6.3 0.013 0.9 0.21 0.19 0.19 2.73 0.52 0.85 0.605 0.560 4.48 2.45 2.56 1.04 CB2 CB4 0.27 0.50 134 12 7.3 0.013 0.9 0.48 0.24 0.43 2.48 1.07 2.52 0.425 0.457 5.48 3.21 3.10 0.72 CB3 CB4 0.46 0.50 146 12 6.3 0.013 0.9 0.46 0.41 0.41 2.73 1.13 2.52 0.449 0.471 5.65 3.21 3.15 0.77 CB4 CB8 0.29 0.50 110 15 8.1 0.013 0.9 0.29 0.26 1.11 2.33 2.58 4.57 0.565 0.537 8.06 3.72 3.83 0.48 CB5 CB6 0.57 0.50 130 8 6.3 0.013 0.25 0.57 0.14 0.14 2.73 0.39 0.85 0.456 0.475 3.80 2.45 2.41 0.90 CB6 CB7 0.09 0.50 145 8 7.2 0.013 0.9 0.66 0.08 0.22 2.51 0.56 0.85 0.656 0.593 4.74 2.45 2.61 0.93 CB7 CB8 0.30 0.50 146 12 8.1 0.013 0.9 0.96 0.27 0.49 2.32 1.14 2.52 0.454 0.474 5.69 3.21 3.16 0.77 CB8 OUTLET 0.21 0.50 40 15 16.2 0.013 0.9 0.21 0.19 1.79 1.48 2.65 4.57 0.580 0.546 8.19 3.72 3.85 0.17 Page 1 -'- i__ e PRELIMINARY GRADING A_N__ STORM DRAINAGE PLAN x �,. X4 ,�44 j „ Fin Z X 15 2C I • 17' .r`8 O cn Z ......_. 1 A51' . am-=`Y.J-) tY3 £lk4.. - - - _ _ L� Z _ 2 7.1 --�- 7 t ri • 't t't. cn r 1y / 2a �� tt‘ : .. la DO i20 �� _J- ,�-- � .-f - t I. ,� �•� / ; 0 70 zo Ln .. y+,- L, H.P t .11 0(� Q dI 17.001___�__ e` % % i (PER TAIL 5 0 r�rf� fA 3 Q O ------ II i , t ♦f. / I' t �1 5PEYV =' TP5- - '' its ' ' ENCLOSIJ(iE LL Z6O Z 2:1 1` �f� .00 r t C. _ (PER oEJ,VI sHT.s) �I.QO1t .: - _. SSD..OSOX __ •F' -H.P. _:t.J � �9 - 2C_ O q�pg,(3111 ri f'a St• i( IR 5HT:'~ - -, imetionr- •. \..._ O Z Z J i 1, /s 1}i9 .L:, r a,': 9. d _ ;t Y d,• rA yqo 20• .• ■ •&Ixi I tg:5 0 W G r i• I�:,ft`/ ,e6 • .v 11�iVL • / `. / •t i' tf.P. �4 7 t t .2t.2 33 $_ �•., .42 J CC • 9 •Dw 1- Q '9..X t7.Tfl,vt :E.U: �Z15.Tr£z ij. • ;) :E.2.:1 t�.fi b :'. . ra'.,t tt`r' YY3ONO P, 1 1 is, O O ��' ✓• �: ,� Bw•z6 �j • Q coo (L 1 I err. j /�- s oc �/ �' / � 'q' r RAN LEADER Ir• LEADER Su^.A k'.• s I� a 7w. 1}B.?O I t U I I I, ,'� �, i' :,.'•,�r-. 21 '15.•70. LEADER &7 1Ds t i S O. 1OOD SDC7fiA0E POND 1' ., "�// ) :�='.-"ei : n, NEW CFUW tJrc _ I ,� •;1 20.4 i J 1 i 1 �r 2.TG l \ .S / \ / �15., rY-'t 21.2 ! ° •i (PER DETAIL SHT.6) Yd �� ' t m 1 ie.L'A i I rt. j; 1 1 1 2 a i I_DIN(�it !I `e•' ,7l 4EADER` ! i i t5 FAIN (� 1 ( I r /1 \ ?.r L L RAN LEADER / rI n4 n ; I� i 19.4e i 0 Z I / ri• •I ii;, 7, r' 4 ct .. -.T2 '�15.O0 { 1 16.W ; - /. - - -_. 0-- i� ! I I• /f / • t'� I ."I.i8 iiir OROCK WAU la 13 26 • • n« O ( • r, t I I f, • /� t '.' ;( /.: {15.L'•0 i -� 16. u-..4. II .i' SHT 7 ) - I 1/ l 15 t t • , . .--t6+,�• `�i n .I■ i c o : r I 1 I,'/ 11` (a•n, H 20.9 L.gAth -. 1 ,t ii ; z i _ ; L :8. :8.10 117 OO 16.w(<5 00 % :4.0•P t,.r,y+'.<y` r t y ■•RAN ••.. ia.0t7 t:}.::x - 1 O OL ;E Z 1 1 . PER D l� )YB,IC&, , r,; i I��.sa A 0-• rr�y uo. y - ;:• , :6.1T0 16 7` +6' 1( ,,� Z C-' 1= n 2:1 1 ---f<.0 / / - ..."." ' �• -.. •q •.r,-R ::t;ti"�'`F"l •,:t 1 18.00 _ �B�B14+.0:i Q ~l y - 1 �W' _ , • ����i.I �l�!i '•.• �'L~j-'t:�i��-T7�r'z'� • i II F-1 I.i N ,i OW '`�' �•� ^67 i.,/ •rs;•• .:'ti ;;. 13 B 777 J o (-1 ,n 3•C ( 'FLOW c(3�rRo1 4 ��" _.y F r :"'04:%' ' -- t1 11 U a .,= t :<i 1_ 3.0 pE yy E y - • Q •?, M.Nz"� • I:1 GQ \ II ( Q� t� I .s o tr• • d �� II t6.0 I Q i 18CKy I J Z (l) .• ,���� _,_ r$ c p �20' i z ' .2 , i�1.•l Gs U '7I 1 ~ U (� c WCrl, is 1fT�• 3xi.;, t. A 4 91 0 (jJ ,n ••�::•.1Vii•rul)��i••••-i:,i' -o t � 19 s NEW ASPHALT PAVEOAeIL t� I�I Tw 70.0 `+�. : .a0 1 H Q ,1 1 • is PER DEW-S+L*.5 I SD•O.SOX I t i- ` BN 16.0 / El) ][ �� Q �i_•jf Twnis.s NEw Exr(umE� ._ £' � �i �`■�i. RL i%3 1 0 Q U 2., 2:t sr,at6-s .CUf� : _'.."_ e '.; / °'Q� 8•RAIN LEi1C>Bi • 11 8• L�ADE'R fA ;' W Q 6 Q •:;!}; 9.0 .� -� 4 (RER SW 4> I I{ jriZ i1e?J t9.lw CO 1 W p R I,] 3 •`•�., SPQ1WbY OWli 71" (;' ( :CB I. pp a NEiACCES51 BOAC) ■ , oa �. -i: ----a r Q / LLI r--- -a.: • .,, 7T - I I U --¢ - • Z 2:1 1 E 7.0G` i ■ _ >9G t `� ? - •114 '' j 1:.39 /� 9.1c +a ' i 1 et-.ir 1 �� W t0 �i 74 i_`.. w 1,�r._ t .•f 1.. A e 18.._ I f1 i 1,, 135E `-- zo.� ts,$ 't Bw=17y} O liir Al'. I I`y� ,- Q J x ' ` i y! Al .r •.•-rr .... J:.4 6.6 7"1 „1 @ *d?C<1 1{ 1 i lL u \_,,, ►EW Cti IJ Nc FENCE • 1 �tu ��B SO•osox "r W_ a U • ... III -1 a D BO w OND ,9 6•EXTAUC)E.iJ (PER DETAL S 6) J ,_ • _ '... -.;• ,. r0 a ° '7 0 - STA C lYS EL=13.0 4 r' CONC..CURB 1 Q I �;'! F M- WS�:F:IS,77 , 17;3 (PER DETNL SHT, 5} - 11 94 t 2:1 ` i TGP 0.f:OvJ STfSW,.;E E.. 16 58 3".ri: Y`(;cT i 7 k . �• • `71� DMION YOLUME REOUIt2E3 14.E88 CE / 1 F;; II 1&43V 1 DEAN ON VCA.131r PROVIDED- ,600 CE 1`O� 1.'.3i IL ,.S 11111•' ' `; aT. ,,,t i; IRANiL> • .�.._ E CY EM m i o t % 2:1 ■ i''F3 t 1a 13 e'F- ' t;t,_' 8'tUCi I PditF£2 '� I : s 11 E C V S 1 .4._ _.,_. 17.48 II m x j SPILLWAY OVELOW ry I Il'r 1'r�1_ te.6; 11111 Ho ■1 few wAL� ( Eg DEN Si! s) NENiCK w z a W ,/r �rQPER �!_a SHT. Bj J \r 1?1% 20. 1.. El: ('�R DET�IIl '6) l w w i _ :t , // ;..7''•J t.,�G : _ 1 EARTHWORK CALCULATIONS >n N N Z a ,B.D ` '`'..° 191. Qr . tv 1 Q ti cc _ . y 3'" �1 - ,. /F,, C13,. .Toe TE)R .A.;, �. .05 _ .. 7L--•- \<.'•'v.irTOTu cur= z.B10 cr o co N K s •. �I 1 •Tp(1 22� ' •'. a13. 7.5z 7;_c , : TN=2Q 1p m uwW l• •• •,'pjl• ■ - •$(3••050X_ _ _ t.dZ i'4.; J'i". I 118.ii� TOTAL FILL = 7,625 5 N 4zµ TT: ai I •o3y. it � ' l 4-r 11 2,.2 \ _17 3 I I J4. .. V� ~ 9.0 •:?••'?• rr `i•• � -� ' 1;,*du 2D1 • _ • v J"''. __.y__.._. c •O.SOX SOURCE OFRFILL.PTO BE DETERMINED 3 :A J 0 2:1 ( AL r. M '/•R-r' S.d •! M�� 1 _ r 1$U: :rt _ iQ.� .{n. 5 .�1e;� I �i n .� � �(��1, ! �a..��il e N Z N N 2:1 ��.1, � i�� 7`� # • ) I I _ ;!C 7� , 'oi6•• r 21.0 I -Y�v Uvi ■I• .12 .r-. • - t 1;. _ • 7 - - i3• =18.5 • 1 ? -N1401 6- r 1 i i� ' via 3A$ 3 e 1 P • .. 19 r 7 1: e a 1 4 c•�t t- J :'( LOT L1OH1' Bw_ - 66• u_DI ICCB 1 ... .�hr .. MH z:T ,� 1 •'LTM� Irk. ') i ry a � , , ram' sc- z u• �0-K.8.44, GJ�'N pbv ems;-• •- IE-15.03 24• 2 "-' \ pi L..4G . . I`-+7:..��_-s•••.••-r+.+ _ u o ._ , E. - o _. ... ....-.*[O'T'_ .4o fl,_ IE=15 03 24•W aP 4.- M14. ! J d IE=5.9(24-E.W) ,. •. -. .. - ••..._...._..._ { __-•_-.. __._.-•1 -.'-. 1ws - ::O- -• IC 1S. O �"'I• y..swd.�•.`su a.avet•o.Jm+1.1�®1'eai •� • - - - .d•F •t.j-r- .. _ � � � - .�-. - � � _ ' 256724.ac � A 0 -- '`��,.--- -:0na¢ - r .�....._=y.q........._......... <, 1..._. --- '_(-ta•=---- 'b 4, toN, l� / 1z Ex. 24.'5D • EK 77:11:J=**'cuiEx jx.SSW v: � Y 4.E%.CURB NNAL Co' bc1 0 OpN$_ / IE 6.5 t3IX.STREET UCM EXPIRES I VEx.CURB IE=CB TIE•6.58 24 W) y11 NRIM=20.7IX. STREET LIGHT DL- ---.-it. - - - -E-b-48 f�ru. -- - - - 00 Te �` --E%. STREET LIGRT �+J}E-14.4 (24'E_W) �Ft*- -�:r+- - _ t45�EWX IE-7 23 8•S) u _II EX.CURB CITY OF RENTON 03 • -- - - -` - - - - - • - - . - PFlzrm OF RFNT(N1 STD, - _ - -Y I -- _.. „JI OEPART7,AEflr OF PUBLIC WORKS F 2•.': - ::1::. is-: Lx.Q+�S LINE...'::" I SR.::2�� ::f t4�, E f'CAS L9 E =1^ PRELIMINARY GRADING AND 0 _E><, 12 w /-Ex'CURB. _ _ _ _ - - _ - - 2" - O DRAINAGE PLAN•_ _ _ _ •_ _ _ _ _. SW 16th STREET z - STORM Z -:s+-LG,'- - ." �1'4 X` -'vs r y04�.-.1 - ti3-"•--_•:,-"_- '•+••^+ .:t - - -------:'_-••a #+a-F .E-1(t.,Cut 50E1 A•. oav® Bos -- O • . ..:Clt CA�tC SIDFAINgL A • 4.• • •• ._ t ..CwP•� '_ LOB LAIR 2/12/99 I•.E No. ... - -t 1 •=+i-+11.- .. ._i q-�f - -- 1.+-=-- I -_ OREM ➢K SCALE 1 zo nab 0 • .. B r>e. ►AaiE-- w 7 Z -- -- -- _.. Ila IKON Err. AR DATE U-. over, 3 OP 8 •m _ Tao P\SOSKPROJ\6M7\ENGINEER NC\6882PCMt.DWC Dote/1(me 02/26/1999 0916 Score- 1-70 Nathan Lets: Z6882-T,Z6882-P8268137-5. 3/1/99 6: 32 : 24 am Shareware Release page 1 CANDLEWOOD HOTEL BACKWATER ANALYSIS BCE#6882 , FILE: 6882BACK.BSN BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: A NAME: 100YR/24HR DEVELOPED SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 0. 21 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0. 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 3 . 90 inches AREA. . : 0. 21 Acres 0. 00 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10. 00 min CN • 98 . 00 0. 00 TC • 6. 30 min 0. 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0. 20 PEAK RATE: 0. 17 cfs VOL: 0. 06 Ac-ft TIME: - 480 min BASIN ID: B NAME: 100YR/24HR DEVELOPED SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 0. 30 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0. 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 3 . 90 inches AREA. . : 0. 30 Acres 0. 00 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10. 00 min CN • 98 . 00 0. 00 TC • 6. 30 min 0. 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0. 20 PEAK RATE: 0. 24 cfs VOL: 0. 09 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min BASIN ID: C NAME: 100YR/24HR DEVELOPED SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 0. 29 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0. 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 3 . 90 inches AREA. . : 0. 29 Acres 0. 00 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10. 00 min CN • 98 . 00 0. 00 TC 6. 30 min 0. 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0. 20 PEAK RATE: 0. 24 cfs VOL: 0. 09 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min BASIN ID: D NAME: 100YR/24HR DEVELOPED SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 0. 46 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0. 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 3 . 90 inches AREA. . : 0.46 Acres 0. 00 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10. 00 min CN • 98 . 00 0. 00 TC 6. 30 min 0. 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0. 20 PEAK RATE: 0. 37 cfs VOL: 0 . 14 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min 3/1/99 6: 32 : 24 am Shareware Release page 2 CANDLEWOOD HOTEL BACKWATER ANALYSIS BCE#6882 , FILE: 6882BACK.BSN BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: E NAME: 100YR/24HR DEVELOPED SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 0. 27 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0. 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 3 . 90 inches AREA. . : 0. 27 Acres 0. 00 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10. 00 min CN • 98 . 00 0. 00 TC • 6. 30 min 0. 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0. 20 PEAK RATE: 0. 22 cfs VOL: 0. 08 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min BASIN ID: F NAME: 100YR/24HR DEVELOPED SBUH METHODOLOGY _ TOTAL AREA • 0. 21 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0. 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 3 . 90 inches AREA. . : 0. 21 Acres 0. 00 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10. 00 min CN • 98 . 00 0. 00 TC • 6. 30 min 0. 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0. 20 PEAK RATE: 0. 17 cfs VOL: 0. 06 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min BASIN ID: G NAME: 100YR/24HR DEVELOPED SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 0. 09 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0. 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 3 . 90 inches AREA. . : 0. 09 Acres 0. 00 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10. 00 min CN • 98 . 00 0. 00 TC • 6. 30 min 0. 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0. 20 PEAK RATE: 0. 07 cfs VOL: 0. 03 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min BASIN ID: H NAME: 100YR/24HR DEVELOPED SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 0. 06 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0. 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 3 . 90 inches AREA. . : 0. 06 Acres 0. 00 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10. 00 min CN • 98 . 00 0. 00 TC 6. 30 min 0. 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0. 20 PEAK RATE: 0. 05 cfs VOL: 0. 02 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min pipes , BARGHAUSEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS-PIPE FLOW CALCULATOR using the Rational Method&Manning Formula KING COUNTY DESIGN FOR 100 YEAR STORM JOB NAME:CandleWood Hotel NOTE: ENTER DEFAULTS AND STORM DATA BEFORE BEGINNING JOB#. 6882 DEFAULTS C= 0.9 n= 0.013 REVISED: d= 12 Tc= 6.3 A= Contributing Area(Ac) Qd= Design Flow(cfs) COEFFICIENTS FOR THE RATIONAL METHOD"Ir"-EQUATION C= Runoff Coefficient Qf= Full Capacity Flow(cfs) STORM Ar Br Tc= Time of Concentration(min) Vd= Velocity at Design Flow(fps) 2YR 1.58 0.58 I= Intensity at Tc (in/hr) Vf= Velocity at Full Flow(fps) 10YR 11.44 0.64 PRECIP= 3.9 d= Diameter of Pipe(in) s= Slope of pipe (%) 25YR 2.66 0.65 Ar= 2.61 L= Length of Pipe (ft) n= Manning Roughness Coefficient 50YR 2.75 0.65 Br= 0.63 D= Water Depth at Qd (in) Tt= Travel Time at Vd (min) 100YR 2.61 0.63 FROM TO A s L d Tc n C SUM A A'C SUM A'C I Qd Of Qd/Qf D/d D Vf Vd Tt CB1 CB2 0.21 0.50 159 8 6.3 0.013 0.9 0.21 0.19 0.19 3.19 0.60 0.85 0.706 0.621 4.97 2.45 2.66 1.00 CB2 CB4 0.27 0.50 134 12 7.3 0.013 0.9 0.48 0.24 0.43 2.91 1.26 2.52 0.499 0.500 5.99 3.21 3.22 0.69 CB3 CB4 0.46 0.50 146 12 6.3 0.013 0.9 0.46 0.41 0.41 3.19 1.32 2.52 0.525 0.514 6.17 3.21 3.25 0.75 CB4 CB8 0.29 0.50 110 15 8.0 0.013 0.9 0.29 0.26 1.11 2.75 3.04 4.57 0.666 0.597 8.95 3.72 3.98 0.46 CB5 C86 0.57 0.50 130 8 6.3 0.013 0.25 0.57 0.14 0.14 3.19 0.45 0.85 0.533 0.519 4.15 2.45 2.48 0.87 CB6 CB7 0.09 0.50 145 8 7.2 0.013 0.9 0.66 0.08 0.22 2.94 0.66 0.85 0.770 0.657 5.26 2.45 2.70 0.89 CB7 CB8 0.30 0.50 146 12 8.1 0.013 0.9 0.96 0.27 0.49 2.73 1.35 2.52 0.535 , 0.520 6.24 3.21 3.26 0.75 CB8 OUTLET 0.21 0.60 40 15 8.8 0.013 0.9 0.21 0.19 1.79 2.58 4.62 5.00 0.924 0.753 11.29 4.08 4.61 0.14 Page 1 • U) y U) O) c- 0) Kl r- (Si U) -- U) E) U) E) 1 K) U) Ol - 4: c- .•1 y 0) 0) E) E) -- (Si rl N) N) c- -- .-4 4 U) U) U1 r- I ..... - Cr K) O. - 7: .1 - - - - - -• -- - 0. - 7: y (Si I I >- y >- 9 I = Cl F- •• 9 F- •• 4 0: w Cl 4 CI 4 '-• C) CI . 4 .-. 4 U) O) K) 0) N) 0) c- E) U) rl O) -4 .4 4: w F-- 2: ►-- C) y E) E) - -- rl rl K1 c- <- U) E1 U) I F- - 1: 4: 4: - y . • . . . . u) U) 4: C: 4 U) u) U) r• 1 4' I 4: U) 0. 0) 0: 7: 9 N) 1) K) N) N) N) K) N) N) N) K) U) 0: 7: y Cl N rl (Si1 CI 0. Ui 2: >: r- I 9 c- I 4 0: 0: '+ U1 • Cr 9 • Cr y >- 4: I-- C) 7: K) 9 c- y I-- 7: U) 0: F- ^ - 4 U) r- 0) rl U) 0) rl Ul 0) N) r- -- y E) c- E) r- ' -4 U) 0_ C) CI rl E) UJ 9 0) 0) 0) E1 El El - - -- rl (Si El U1 9 U) 0) Ul U) 1 C) -) C) F• I C) 9 • C) y • C) C) Cl •• r1 4 (Si (I CI K) Kl Kl NI K) N) NI K) •• rl 4 (Si rl rl Cl t • UJ 1 - >- 4: 4 UJ I-- 4 I-- 4 _1 w 1 I F- ': 0) UJ •• y w .4 - 0: F. >- 7: is _1 7: y c- c- c- c- c- c- c- <- c- c- c- U1 4 _1 7: 4 Ul 0) K) 0) r 1 U. .-+ C) I-- I Ui 2: F-- C) 4 N) N) N) N) N) N) N) NI N) N) N) 2: I-- C) 4 l) E) - -- I UJ f: UJ C) .+ 4: C) .4 CI C) y . . . . . . . . . . . Fl Cl CI 4 • • • • I 4: 4: 1 C) 4: .. 9 K) K) N) NI Kl K) N) N) N) VI K) F-. 4 N) N) N) K) t I-- w 1 UI C) 0) C) - 9 4 F- 4: 0: C) _ _1 2: C) c- - 4 0) y C) F-- 4: UJ )-+ (Si 4: 4 c- c- c- c- c- c- c- c- c- c- c- r- 4: 9 U) 0) N) 0) t w u) C) w _ I-- •• • .+ 4 K) NI K) K) K) K1 K) N) K) K) K) • F. 4 CI CI - -- ( 1 ': O. 0: J ') K) C) F- 4 . . . K) C1 F- y •C) 7: .7) O) Cl >- 0_ I - 4 K) K) K) N) K) K) K) K) NI K) N) -- 4 K) K1 411 K) t 2: -• 2: 0: f: CI y y •-• - C) h-1 4: C) 0: y y U) F- 2: EI (4) _ C) 4: •• 9 Ul 0) -- c- r- E) K) U) 0) K) U) •• 4 c- Ul 0) C) 4: 4: I CI I-- U) t: y U1 U) r- r- r- 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) F- Ul is y c- c- c- Ul l F I I U1 I I 0: c_ Ul U1 C) y UJ U1 C) y • • 4: 4: is C) 4: J C) 4 1 C) 4 C) U) U. F-- C1 U1 _ U. I-- I-- 9 F-- 9 4: 2: U) _) rl y _) r- y 0: •. C) C) N) 9 U) 0) El K) U) r- CI (Si c- U) 0) C) U) 4 <- u) o) 0) . Ui F- •• C) 9 u) U) r- r- r- r- o) o) o) o) o) C) 9 c- c- c- c- l F- =7 - U1 F- 4- 2: CI y 4: 0. Cl 0. =3 C) a'. CI y Cl 4 1-2: 1 >- 0. 7: , E) 2: 9 EI 2: __,I .4 U. F- 2: F- F- Ul UJ y U) w 9 . 4 0: I r. Cl 0. • 0) C) 4 r1 (Si (Si (Si N (Si (Si (I (Si (Si Cl • Ol CI 4 ( I (Si C1 rl r 4: 4: UJ ': i-i C) 4: y 4: 4 F. F- C) 4: _ I U. y El E) E1 El El E) E) CI E) EI E) U. 4 E) C1 E) E) 4: C1 J F-- I-- EI I 9 El I y • I C) U. 4_ _1 2: e4 EI 2: 9 CI U) 2: 9 I 0: Cl U1 .-4 y 4 O: UJ 2: 0: 0) 9 9 4 9 4 8 y 4 y 9 4 4 9 0) 4 4 9 4 9 4 , UJ KI -+ > 2: 0. - y - y • I-- C) F- 4: O. • y O. • 4 C) 4: • .-/ 7: ^ C) _-a y c- 0) (Si r- Cl r- K) 0) U) -- 01 C) y - U) N) -- C 2: C) C) C) U1 - = w 4 0) 0) 0) 0) E) 0) -- -- (Si K) KI r • U1 y E) E) -- rl r _J 2: -. C) 0: U) J 1 4 • • . • r1 1 1 4 U1 f. U1 1 f: C) -- U1 Ul 4 O) U) U) U) r- r- r- r- r- r- r- --- UI UJ 4 r- r- r- r- r 0. 4: UJ 1 U1 4: c: 1 y - - - - - - - - 1 I-I F-- O. U1 _ U1 F. I y i y - - 0. .-) I 0: Cl U 7: y Cl 7: y U. 0. U. F. U. -1 y U. _J y U) C) -• C) C) U) _J U. 9 _1 2_ 61 U) J 0. >: 0: y 0: 4 C) UJ 1 2: U. UJ _) 4: 0) UJ • 4 c- UI 4 .4 0_ U1 C) 0: O. f: - F- y U) 0) N) 0) K) 0) c- E) U) rl 0) K) = F- .1 U) E) r- U) t' F- >- I .-4 Ul >- 2: Cs -- -- C) U. 4 E) E) - -- (Si rl K) c- c- U) U) -- C) U. 4 U) U) U) r- C •4 F F- F. 4: y y 11 Cl F- F. C) ••r1 ': y NI K1 N) N) N) N) N) KI N) NI KI -: y Cl Cl (Si (Si r CI 2: >- CI >- >- 2: • .. .. 7: 4 ., ., 7: 4 0) CI U. •• 2: •• U. U. f. ^ - - y N (Si 4 0) (-) r. 0: CI 0: .) . 4 X: Cl 4 y U) C) UJ C) w C) C) C! U) 9 4 W F- F- UI w C) Cl y rl rl (Si rl rl (Si (Si (Si N (Si CI Cl C) 4 0) r- U) c- r 11 C) 0_ :: 2: E) O. 0. . c- 2: 2: U) y 0) 0) EI (Si c- U) 0) E) (Si c- w 2: 2: U) y 0) -- (Si N) < + 1 UI U1 0) C) U1 •Ul U) U. y • 1: U_ Ul 1 U) U1 (Si UJ Cl C) 9 (Si (Si N) N) K) N) K) s- c- c• c- UI C) C-1 9 - - F- -. • U • F- U) 0. s: - 4 - - 1 - (Si U) s: -- O) N Ill 2: • F. _) Cf y .4 2:) Cl y () C) C) - .-4 - J) rl UJ (Si 0. .-) 4 0. ') 4 El I<) U) 0) U) 4 0) c U) 0) -- NI Ul C• E) Cl - O) 0) 01 0) 0) ,+ 4 c- Ul U) U) Ul U) U) Ul Ul C- C- 0. X. 4 4 is 9 - E) E) E) E) - F4 4 Ul U) 0) -- Ul 0) U) -- 0) U) Ul ) E1 rl P<) c- C) t E) Cl c' U) U) 0) El N) U) II) NJ N) NI N) U) ]: 4 Cl Cl N C1 CI Cl CI N) N) N) NI rl 4 y U1 ! 0) 0) Ul U) U) - 4 -- E) NI U) E) c- 0) U) C1 0) 0) 0) E) -- Cl UJ 4 E) -- C1 Nl c• U) C• 0) E) C1 K) C) 4 . . C1• N N) N) NI •• 4 C1 CI C1 C1 C1 CAN CI N) N) NI 8 U I 4 c- El U) N 0) _J 4 U) E) C- U) I<l -- EJ E) E) E) -- N) c- c- UI U) 2: C) 4 U) U) U) C- 0) 0) E) -- CJ N) c- ! I!l N) N) NI N) 4 Cl Cl CI rJ C1 Cl N) N) N) N) NI 4 U) 4 i c E) U) N O) < 4 U) E) C• U) N) -• E) E) E) E) U) U) - 4 U) U) U) C- 0) 0) El -- N N) c- r= + o NI▪ NI N) N) NI -- 4 N N Cl C1 C1 N N) NI N) N) NI C) • U) U) C- O) -- N 4 U) 0) E1 -- KI U) U) 0) E) C1 U) U) U) U) U) Ul I-- .: 4 N) 1() e- c- <- c• c• c- U) U) U) • Ul CI 4 . _1 • U) I 4 U) C- 0) E) Cl 4 e- U) C- 0) 0) E) N I() c- U) U) Ul U) U) U) U) UI C) 4 N) N) N) N) N) c- c• c e• c- e- _1 CI +1 . . • . • • . • . . • 3.4 4 U. E) 4 U) 4 I Cl CI N CI N • C) 4 Cl C1 CI Cl N Cl CI Cl CI CI C1 a: + U. E) E) E) E) E) U. 4 E) CI EI EI El E) El E) Cl E) E) y 6) s: 4 01 4 Cl t 4 y 4 4 4 8 84 t t 4 4 .1 8 4 4 M 0_ • 4 ui U) U) U) U) C- C) r - -- N) U) E) <- E) U) N) E) c- U) U) C- 0) U1 4 I<) <- U) UI 0) 0) .-- C1 c- U) 0) • C- C- C- C- C- UI 4 C- C- C- C• C• C• 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 4 7. 4 U. 4 UI r O) 4 F4 0) 9 E) E) E) E) - U) I-- 4 U) U1 0) -- U) 0) U) -- 0) UI U) 61 E) N NI c- -• U. 4 E) N c- U) U) 0) E) N) U) 0: N) N) N) NJ N) 4 CI Cl N Cl CI Cl Cl I<) N) N) N) 1 ]: 8 N) 8 a: 4 0) C. Ul N) CI C) 4 CI U) El c' 0) Cl UI 0) NI C• -• >- U) U) C- 0) 0) 2: U) r U) U) U) U) u) C- C- r- o) o) 0) u. . u. M • . • H Ul C) 4 C) 0_ - 8 UI F4 Cs 4 0- 0. 4 u) U) C1 4 U) 0) N. 0) KI 0) rl r- -- U) -- U) U) El r1 c- U) 0 4: c- " 4 03 01 El El r1 rl Kl NI <- E) r4 U) U) U) U) U Cr N) 0. rJ 7: 4 - - - - - - - - - 0- - 7: rl I 1 >- 4 >- I 25 Cl F. •- 4 I-- •• O: UJ 2: C) 8 2: CI '•' C) ) CI '-4 F' 4 - K1 Ul 0) r1 U) 0) r1 Ul E) U) ri r' U) 0) r1 r• - 4: UJ I-- 2: I-- C) a U1 U) Ul Ul U) Ul U) C• r- O) 0) F. C) 0) 0) 0) 0) E E. f: 4: 4: 1 4: - 4: I• 4: C) a. <- a: 7: 4 K1 N) NI N) Kl K) K) K) N) N) N) r- a: 7: r1 rJ r! r1 N CI 0. UI 2: >: rJ I 4 0) I 0: 0: r' UI • Cr 4 • Cr >- 4: I-- CI 7: K) 4 K1 I-- 7: U) 0: I•- - - 4 El E) -- rl <- U1 111 r- 0) E) - - c- r- E) <- 0 ''' U) 0. C) Cl rl El UJ 4 <- c- N. c- c- V. N. N. N. U) U) E) UJ 0) 0) 0) 01 0 C) _) C) F4 I • C) y • • CI • C) - C) CI •• <- 4 K) N) K) N) K) K) K) N) K) N) K) •• rl N Cl r1 rJ r U1 -1 1 ,-- >- 4: 'I UJ F. 4 I-- , -1 U1 I F- - U) UI 4 UI r > u1 ' _ 0: F4 >- 7: 2: _1 7: 4 0) 0) o) 0) 01 0) 0) 01 0) 0) 0) _1 7: - K) U) o) r 1 U. F4 C) F- 1 UJ 2: I-- C) 4 U) U) U) U) U) U) U) U) U) U) U) 2: F- C) u) Ul U) U) U UI f: U1 C) F4 4: C) FI C) Cl 4 - 4-4 Cl C) • • I 4: 4: _I C) .L: F+ 4 Kl K) NI NI N) K) NI N) K) N) K) F' K) N) N) K) K F- UI i' UI C) C) C) - 4 - I-- 4: a: Cl -> _J 2: C) E) -. 4 c- CI F '-- 4: U1 ' E) 4: 4 01 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) Cl 4: -- Kl U) 0) r UJ U) C) UI _> F- - • '- 4 U) U) U) UJ U) U) U) U) U) U) U) • F' U) U) U) U) U _1 '7: 0. 0: _1 21 K1 C) 1- . • • • K) C) F- • • • • u) 7: _) 01 C) >- 0. I - 4 N) K) N) K) K) NI N) K) N) K) K) - N) K) NI Kl N 2: 2: 0: 2: CI 4 1-1 - Cl - '-' 4: C) 0: 4 U) f- 2: El 01 _ C) 4: 4 rl c- r- E) K) U) 0) -- N) U) 0) •• 4: 4: I CI 1-- u) 2: t U) UI U) C• r- r- r• 0) o) 01 0) F- co O) E) r F. I I UI I I' 0: -: UI UI Cl 4 C) N) N) <. <: < u1 UJ Cl 4: 4: 2! CI 4: _1 C) 9 _1 Cl CI u) U. F- C) U) _ U_ F• F- 4 F- 4: 2- U) _) rl 4 _1 U) 0: -• Cl C1 rJ 4 Ul 0) E) K1 U) r• E) Cl c- U) 0) C) r• 0) E) -- K U1 F- •f' C) 4 U) U) r- r- r- r- 0) 0) 0) 01 01 Cl KI K) <- <- < F- ') - UI F- 'e- 'c: C1 1 ., ' Cl 4: 2:0_ C) O. _I C) Jr' CI r )' C) _1 >- O. 7: r4 E) 2: : -� E) Z_ _J F•' U. M. 2: F- F- U) UI 4 U) UI F4 0: 1 r' Cl O. • 01 C) 4 Cl Cl r1 Cl Cl CJ rI Cl CI Cl r1 • 0) C) Cl Cl Cl Cl r 4: 4: U1 -: r4 Cl 4: 4: F- F- ' C) 4: _ I U. 4 E) E) E) El E) El E) E) E) E) E) U. E) El El El E 4: Cl _1 F- F-- El 1 4 • . . . E) I • • I CI U. 4: _J 2: 61 E) 2: 4 61 0) 2: I 0: CI UJ r1 .1 F. 0: U1 2: 0: 0) 4 t 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 9 4 4 4 0) 4 9 4 4 9 1 UI N. > AC: 0_ - 4 • F- C) r- 4: 0- • 4 0. • C) 4: • F1 7: - U '> 4 U) C• E) K) U) 0) N) U) El c- 0) Cl ->_ K) U] 0) <- 0 • 2: _: C) - C) Cl U1 - Ul 4 r- r- 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) E) El E) _ •• UI 01 0) 0) 0) 0 -1 a: -' C) 0: UI 1 1 4 • • . CJ ! 1 • UJ r' 1.11 1 f: C) -- UI UJ 4 U) U) (1) Ul U) Ul U) U) r- C- r- -- Ul UJ U) ❑l Ul U) U. 0. 4: U1 -1 U1 4: 2: 1 r - - - - - - - I - - - r+ F- 0_ U1 -5 UI r' I -: 4 1 - 0. F4 I O: Cl C) 7: * C) 7_ U. 0. U. I-- U. 1 4 U. 1 CO C) '' C) C) U) - _1 U. 4 _1 U. 2: UI U1 1 0. >: 0: 4 0: C) UJ 1 2: U. UI _) 4: E) U1 '- 4 U) UJ F4 0. UJ C) 0: 0. 2: c- - F- 4 - K) CO 0) Cl U) 01 Cl U1 E) U) <- F- U) 01 Cl C- - F- >- I r' UI >- 2: Cl -- C) U. 4 Ul U) U) U) Ul UI U) C- r- 0) 0) -- C) U. 0) 0) 0) 0) E I-, I-- F• F- 4: - 4 Cl F- F4 Cl -CI 4 N) N) N) K) N) NI N) NI K) Kl N) Cl r1 C1 rl K. 2: >- Cl >• >• 2: • .. .. 7: 4 ., .. 7: 'I Cl U. •• c: •• U. U. F4 - - 4 Cl C1 r/ O: C) 0: '-' r' 2: r1 9 Cl C1 0) Cl U1 C) U1 C) C) Cr U) 4 • • 0) -: UI F- F- UI U1 • C) C) '- 1 Cl r1 r1 rl r1 C1 rJ Cl Cl C1 C1 C) C) r- Ci 0) c- E, U) C) 0_ 2: -: 2: E) 0. 0. •• <• 2: 2: Ul 4 U) 0) El rl c- U) 0) E) Cl <- U) 2: 2: U) C- 0) 0) 0) E, I u1 U1 0) Cl UJ -u) u) 0: - U. • Tl U. U) J E) U1 rl UJ C) U 4 CI Cl K) Kl N) N) N) <- <- <- c- U1 U C) •- :- F• • U. F. U) 0. 2: - 4 0. 2: "r. 1 - rl U) 2: -- 03 Cl K) s' • r' ..2) CY 4 FI _) Cl Cl 1) - rl - - Cl UJ rl 0. •-) 4 0- '-) N <- U) r- O) U) r- 4 -- NJ U) 0) E) rJ e. U) r- O) U) + CI e• U) u) r- o) EI -- CI e- U) I U) Ul 01 U) U) <- 1-1 q e- e- c- c- e• U) U) U) U) U) U) F4 A N) Kl N) N) K) Kl e- e- c- e- c- ., y _ y • o. 7: 'I O. 7: 4 >• 'I J- 4 F 4 I-- 'I 2: C) 4 4: 4 • U) C1 0) e- /-4 1-1 '1 0) N) 0) U) e' rJ EI 0) 0) 0) 0) 1•1 t E) U1 rJ 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) E) N - -- N CI N) I-- C) 4 CI N) K1 U) U) r- r- o) o) EI C) r r- r- 0) 0) 0) E) -- rl N) Ul U) • • G: - r Kl K) K) N) N) E) 0: 3: 'I rJ C1 CJ rJ CJ CJ CJ C1 CJ CJ K) U) ]: 4 - -- - -- C1 CJ CJ PI CJ rl r- I 4 NI 'I • C I '1 4 c 4 U) 4 0) N) 0) <- 0) - 4 U) 0) U) -- 0) U) K) -- E) 0) 0) - 'I 0) K) -- 0) r- U) U) U) U) r- 0) E) -. -- N CJ EI U1 4 CJ CI Kl e- <- U) U) r- 0) 0) 0) UJ • C) w 4 U) C• O• 0) 0) EI CJ K) c• U1 C) C] 4 •t Kl N) N) N) N) •. CJ 4 N CJ C1 CI C1 N CJ N C1 N C) •• 4 - - - - -- CJ CI C1 N N CJ F- 4 i F-- 4 U1 •• 9 UJ 'I 0) r) U) E) U) _J 7: 4 Ul O) CI r- -- U) -- U) N 0) e• _1 'I 0) N) 0) U) e- rJ E) 0) 0) 0) 0) U) r- r- 0) 0) 2: I-- C) * 0) 0) 0) 0) E) E) - -- N N NI 2: C) 4 C1 K1 N) e- U) U) C- r• 0) 0) E) F, C) C) y 1-4 C) 4 • N) N) N) N) K) 1-+ 4 CJ N N CI N) N) N) N) N) N) N) 4 rJ CJ C1 CJ CJ CJ CJ N N CJ NI 4 4 r- 4 E) 'I i 0) N Ul EI U) 0) 4: 4 Ul 0) CI r• -- U) -- U) CI 0) c- C- 'I 0) N) 0) U) <- N E) 0) 0) 0) 0) U) r- r- O) o) • 4 0) 01 0) 01 E) E) -- -- C1 rJ NI -: 4 N K) N) U) U) r- r- 0) 0) E) Kl C) F- 'I . • . . • . . . . . . F=• o. N) N) N) K) N) - 4 CJ CJ CJ CJ N) K) N) N) K) N) NI - 4 rJ CJ C1 C1 CJ rl N C1 C1 CJ K) C) '1 4 I.- 'I 4 U) U) U) 0) 0) E) •• 4 E) -- N c- U) U) r- 0) EI CJ •• 'I c- U) U) C• 0) 0) EI C1 CJ N) <- <- c- <- U) F- U) 2: 4 N) K) N) N) N) K) NI Kl e- c- e- F. 2: 4 CJ C1 N N N N K) K) N) N) K) I • • U) UJ Cl 4 U1 Cl 4 J C) 4 —I 4 U) F- 4 F- 4 :) El 'I =1 4 U) U) r- 0) C) C) 0) 'I 01 E) -- N K) <- U) U) r- 0) 0) C) 4 e- U) U) Ul r- 0) 0) EI EI -- r) UI e- c- c- <- U) C) 4 C1 K1 N) NJ N) K) K) K) K) N) N) C) 4 N C1 N N N CJ CJ N) K) K) N) _1 CI4 . . . . . . . . CI 4 . . . . . . . . . . . r.4 C1 4 re! '1 U. E) 2: 4 E) '1 U) Ul 4 U) 4 I 1 C) Cl C1 C1 C1 • 01 C) 4 N N N N C1 N C1 CJ C1 CJ N • C) '1 CI N N rl CJ C1 N N N N N EI EI EI E) E) U. t EI Cl E) E) CI E) E) E) E) E) E) U. 4 El El E) E) E) El El E) E1 E) E) EI I t I y . 61 U) 2: 4 61 2: 4 4 C U) '1 4 -: 0. - • • UJ 0) N) 0) u) .-- C.) Z. 4 0) K) 0) Ul e- CJ El 0) 0) 0) 0) C..) Z. 4 U) E) r- (4) <- NJ NI N) c- U) r- 2: EI - -- N Kl a • UJ t 0) CI E) -- N K) <- e- Ul U) r- 4 UJE) -- -- rJ K) c- U) 0) r- 0) O) 0) J ) t O) J I r- r- r- r- r- UI Ul 4 U) r- r- r- r- r- r- r- r- r- r- uJ 4 r- r- r- r- r- r- r- r- r- r- r- _ - - - - - I - - - - 'I - - - - - - - - - - : C) 7: 4 j: 'I - U. J , U. 4 UJ _l U- 4 -J 'I U) a: 'I 'I aI U) Ul 4 E) 4 -- U) N 0) c- c• ' F- t 0) K) 0) U) <• NC) 0) 0) 0) 0) N) F- 4E4 U) CJ -- 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) E) rJ UI -- rJ CJ K) -- C) U. 4 CJ K) Kl e- U) U) r- r- O) 0) El -- U. 4 r- C- 0) 0) 0) E) -- C1 N) U) Ul 0: N) KI N) N) K) 4 C1 C1 CJ rJ CJ C1 CJ N C1 CJ N) -: 4 - - -- -• -- C1 r1 CJ CJ N CJ I - ., 7: 4 .. J: 'I KI K) 4 e- 9 0: 4 4 • • 4 • 8 N 0) N) 0) U) C) C) A r- EI N) (4) 0) N e- C- E) NI U) C) -- 4 U) r- 0) -- K) U) r- 0) -- K) U) >- -- CJ N N) 2: 2: Cl) 4 N) e- e- e- c- U) U) U) U) U) U) :2: U) 'I CJ CJ N K1 K) N) N) N) e• e- c- U. • - - - - U) C.) C) 4 UJ C) 9 O. c: - ) 0- 'I U1 1-1 _) CJ 4 1-4 C7 4 O. 0_ '", 9 0. 'I Cl) I b PRELIMINARY GRADING AND STORM DRAINAGE PLAN .. ... ... ... to ;»;f-- .._. .._..__..__.._..._- •--__--_^_.._-.._...._.._..._ _ - xa { - ;'` z Z Z __ .'---- • _-1$:'+O' +Xi. iiF<.. 5 5.,;0 _ - -r- 7 2:1 `� Y i 2 . --11 - T - _ 4 21 2 I a 75 ,e U) O J tt 19.M t 2'1 L_ \ ', �T . � :_1- �;i;ix- � rx; -1 0, : Z O �� . . ✓' I -��� F W'S 5.SL) Dyy ^` 41 o ,0 20 40li '- T (� sg I 77.. ' �r..� r _J nq ° (PER ETAdL rr.s �k j Q 0 • 1 - i 1,:... . _A. / ' /' 1•'a C!! t'-{ W ABPHALTPANT �V 1�'� I� TRASH ENCLOSURE•70 �Csrq� i :,f r i Z O i 2:1 i f WI n^ 1`' (PER DEVUL SHT 5) O Z Q I r! •�r - ..� w 1 47� o t I ' r.. . . •�._ _- _ 4.513X `! a - -. 5 I tCb ._....._ O • ��yry{f���q�, IY W i if f 15.M•I �: . �,r,s�K.,."SC$T 9' --.......,• -_ -. -� :T x, _ -.... ..\ Z 1 ; HT: l J _LEADER ..aE.W I ,°:<a W li U . f t 1 7 t i New(11fPICRI) a C:CY 7 - 'i ; „Fe?i 2 1 `ai f W I j f• .'t 15 CrCr.}:iylf.:a�gt-I# =. y :8.2:1 \� t / • 3t` Y, wCONO'>a ;c-.k 'T .r f 18.cL t O O 14 1 . 1<,'•.s.x ': '�6'' �_ �!:f� IE.. TW=<r,9 II i 2 an ``I i , ( ! i •/' �� i �' 1 i 2L2 6'RAN L.EADEf1 ' itR!1LEAD i A ::yV �' B14;7s Ma.70 f 1t: U 21 FLOOD S710RAOE P 3M)I. .� ,%. . f 4'. ,`15.001 A•. p TW=75 1 .f <: .i 6 1 I 20.5 iBW=7.5 O 3.;,! J 2.A ]]���� 21.2 • CHAN LNK FENCE Wt 11 -1,, 1 ill -) % I i . \ ) \ f ........:" ✓ ,,'t PER DETAIL SHT.6) II 7 .n 6 18 C-0 I r 4. i ` <` :::::::::>;.:: ." NEW L, a j i 7,7 "a:!..> .. •RAN LEADER f-� p 't f IaEADER•` / J -x E: ;r:{'::i's'>i_ _ , 1846 i �d17 :2ii1::'?:iii<:ii" �;� 1 1s.0D; �..L l /.! •j i .cam,,. • .11 •I00 1• 7' i _ ���111yyy ROCK WALL I. 16:26 jt i, �& s;'. 41 •16 a8 yf.P�R DETAIL SAT na. : I ''. i i f .) .G t r ; {1,'x.^.. •i 18.54a • r�� ` ' 6) LI (1„1,Z, m K• I :a.M?F aY'0 ! ! : - , • 6'RAN LEADER• i - �: ; '�. :8. :8.00 I 1 ' 16.CJ( C t Y e-,V600 -�. ,-:m �' �( 11 1 Q O `6 E a -CO i i NEW CHAN uNIC'!'ENGFI `> ;IG; 1 _Zwk7 r_ 1 i I 3$ (PER DETAIL SHE6) ;» .F.,'.\'.' :-} i �. .[vEwcoNc•sf wAt c ' _ is s.�c a7c` '- i� Z z:1 i � r t rr�-� u co t r i4`.�., '''t. - d"•• ~• •` .'\.' i ,t 1800 ✓-1 4 ISd.7 cn N NEW S_ ?l ��` G ® > +ir'+j�`i',":i•i i..,.�.r.'. =: .. I ;• ,T�F:4f.O; E-4 W a'd X t ii t �°W /' -• ,::.Y :, 1s 1 W me W t I= .30 J; _ ti fie... ,•. ` • .e . :+.._`. ^>; J GV c o t /t3.0t.1 !:' \�` .:ice` xsP '??> - 0.0/ , �DQ \ II I O Q " g .�m uni i t V i�i 6 . rk _69i�1r�2 6 r rr,,.: `t j CC co YZ mE I. ••a. •.I�: 21 ff -"l..„,,,_„, 0.,%. r.(� ) ,`\ < j • `.80G i J Z Cl) ......'n . '�'._.'_-._. ._.__-r� .-‘ ', 86 '' La 2fi.a flU .. .I i W W cn BO ipl O P,` Q'. rn {{ 1 Z a y ' G�•••• •=11i� __ •9.6 NEW ASPHALT AVEML'' .,.. m a U Q ,<����_��}id a.o:._ • rH. q. `-""-- -=�•�.�8�SD..•�0,5Q,( i N o (��rz�.ALT P 8,6-0 a BW 16.0, ; .8 00 11 I Q .. : • 11 ....., i (_) za ;.y.; 21 9.0 •� ��_ E +-� '� sl O. rRAN 1 Q a / D ��p \_� 8'R�L�ADR CA O Q sH �} ,� s;i-i }'Sf+l� C8 yv 'I•. Ike. 619.00 COo I • yL +/P. T- may, {i i' ,,, 3.• f r 7 g nil a 9,� x 't SPOIL WhY OW -�aw,r k (rV',' �I(�y `rLA ---- ,,7`. I - ��II Z ) 0�0 - W Za p CCEsa 1 - I(3RAV3';A ROAD !. - ;- W r - AAA yy 'Z ; 1 i 6.6:3 t..GO •� 'tytaiQO r �� Y. rf`•�.?h317.S3./ <' °.t-?823 U d x i i 1 : :6 7 �� Tw*20 '3II i 1 �'�` 3 1t4 ` 1 O II Y U x 1I1. i 1 r ,•• �t f I Tr y 1 f : i Iss14 5 : `�� i 12:1tt _ i I 121 ti '.€ f':�4�t!>,. • ,,ON/ �• r':o,{y. ;' U • ;��� £> R -.•• 4f3ac,E IfEw CHA11 E ' 1 r SO•o.50X W •.w•.?2 j• •_.. .^• •I F: f S#h -AfS '#30 R.D; XT�?lK"ic:J PER DETAILS J ws h� ........................................... 1«r C7.2 AG o.3Qa�G corc j 1�7� a_ 2:1 2:1 S:I saw*yTORnGr E:;t: ' i:.:; 'y ; ;,p� i �'11RS.^1#---__ 483 • �, )- `<9h.DME:aEQUI 0 £4,$$$Lx I':rL. # i'r.i 3 i5 j SRiuu FO=.TO GF t x .:, Q.�� t {I 1 te.a9� g m ; r #4Q � ? < � $J l , ; v.�� yv n I� �RAl t i 'g as s w gjm{egg R@� ..X % 2:1 , 7.4 <33:i r: t �:_ = r ,,� s'flA,N LEADER _ ' I'lli.,r ', 'BACKWATER ANAkLYSI 8 S E i )'�W 1tow I t, yy, �-, C•L7 ,, • • t7.4E >�PLL•WAY ' i `.. f 18.s •� �� (PER. pqK WA.t L %; �EW,A3�'iJ5 T PA k1ENij I I � �/ �) ��, • -...i \ ���20.Si 2 •I�CK W, 19.1A)' �`��"-•�...�_ _ N 2< c, :tLai ce i i IIGt L- 1 zo t DET 6 z lf_ w % ' I t8. :' e,•.yy,i>•t�6:.1� F CA n'y + AOILIWATEfl .z a. tr_::vv: i y t s:� _ - !l� • i .,9 t CALCl1L4ilONS Q n N cV -z '.�shc /:w 4� �•■ •f i TO(3 )Z'SE)J 050X d -_ •:.c _ - s;c':` 21.2 ,,t °:i)• TOTAL CUT=2.Bt0 CY a00 N ?� 7i t 7 Ta 1'f�' full _� - 7.a� - 1W=2o o > :�. �:}•�.•� a 1p _ 'f� • la ooN TOTAL FILL'=7• .625 CY Z w w 1 • , • r=•�p a,..d4 ,I11, !�7 �•+.C -tea%?`' L i _ _ I__ _ •I• _ J9 - TOTAL IMPORT 4.815 CY n a z ti IVJt i ,:: a x- i NK FENCE .•0.50X,; 3 vt n c� CB " l a q� - ' 3,^.s - .-�...- 18.z• SOURCE OF nu-TO BE DETERMINED N N W i 9.0 N 1 2D1 f� ..\ m 2:1 .•I. �,...1” .£ fi• 1 J �� --•- �...� ��.��r- S N Z U•1 rf) , I:`. -1 r ` :, e aY t ��■ =18.5 c�sn • ``�--, I� f, ,$?' ® - fZ ;i a£fl N M-21.D!l&5 , IJFIf BW E%.Ca - \ !`-1+i: ! 2 n� ...... K•SA 9.6r, RIM=21.4 -'^.- ,.-1 K.0?GAfrt:-._.- .. -n-•"i!.8 "-'..,.;ems.',.. C �:_,,,< "' ._._ _' _ - -.,'-ac.0.;}- _ .. � '>_ _. _•y�.tF '.. ......IE=15.03 24•E) ... 3J".'•�..._.._.. ���'1 MASp MF $9 f •• .. xw.._ ....-...._. ' _ _ IE 15.03(24• �F.....1/4� i,!•i.� d 513jo Q il .9 .17 _ ... 'W`7a.•Pt"• bf K:'-,,Eli,.�.,�.......... .... _'+ ,t.:'..a�i .om..w.L.. - _ -- S':::ei."- _ _ l' 251372 A. _,.._��,R,...R.. _ _ _z,...,.._...__.._.-.p..,,•--_...«._......_....>_.... 3..._......._....A.4. _.._...,._..........4•h4,..............._............,..mow.-�.__.......... ..........,....-N1M,},, -' � ---- Via( t-, - 0f_ f« ,� z `• 4'. IX. 24�50 �,�'y IX.24'SD • - - -„I ..... 1�1� _ .. 56--- FjJ,/�I STE0.N V' JN �EX.CURB 01 CB1 2t EPo%N- M73 y CURB ONAI_f b'e.,e RCN`'PoM=20.7D( �LK;HT IX.STREETLIGHT IE-6.58 24' ay HI ED. UCHTI EXPIRESco E%.STREET LIGHT IE-,4,4(24'E,W) _ -IE4.48 A - N - - 2 ��p.?ice -i+.4• - - 24-1 :1 48- �_2+t4- BE�ELOCJTE�- -31.ed- •{- . CV - 4S Aff=723 8•S) '� -I �EL C• PI FI�fITY f1F RFNTDN$TD$ _rt_ _ _ _ I J _ CIIY OF RENTON oo'n DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS �I " EX.OAE UNE • a 2`.13 . {:1::C, a . :.i: . -t' • EX.6AS UNE•t 2C.62' EX.Jr WIX.CURB _ __- _ - - - -_- • - -•- - - -•- - --- - - •- - - -•- - - -- -- _ • - STORMDRAINAGEPLAN SW 16th STREET _ _ ,z•w "^ PRELIMINARY GRADING AND O CO•'a-'--cam. -- - -- v'<;�'�-- --- - - - 69--- - ---•^r-. -.r�-$��-: r. -- �.3i�L!;s_•- --- _-, . ...., ^ .r ?cr.- _ - ,,;; tt. -+111-:E Z f. 51UFNAfk:. _ r.. 013A2PED BDS _ ..,_----'''-----'t- -• ...................................._:,, ,... ..-- -rs.ue--_-_----`-"-•-----'-- • --`--..... ..5°4• -- - S -- _ coma- coma B _ SCALE 2/t220/99 !U!!fla 7 0 _- a€a® MQern.o■oalL_ruc� W • 221 1�1.a■ .� Aln iUE Aena o�a> .;so. 1N�Y 3 aF 8_ m • FN: P:\SOSNPROJ\6882\ENCINEERINC\6882PGM19w0 Date/Time:02/26/1999 09:36 Scale: 1=20 Nathan Xrah: Z6882-T26882-PB26882-S. AND STUDIES S S • 6.0 SPECIAL REPORTS AND STUDIES Included in the special reports and studies is the traffic analysis by Johnson and Associates, Inc., as well as a wetland evaluation provided B&A, Inc. Earthcalc, Inc.,also provided calculations for the volume of floodplain storage on the existing site. 6882.008 [NJM/jss/sm/ph] EXHIBIT N WETLAND EVALUATION ID 8` A c • August 5, 1998 Ness Holding Company Steve Ness 6645 N. Ensign Street Portland, OR 97217 RE: WETLAND EVALUATION, PROPERTY NORTH OF SW 16TH STREET, BETWEEN PACIFIC AVENUE SW (VAC) AND THOMAS AVENUE SW (VAC) Dear Steve: The above referenced property has been evaluated for the presence of wetlands in the late winter and spring of 1998. The DOE Washington State Wetland Delineation Manual was used. The site was observed and monitored with one small area in the northwest corner of the property meeting the technical criteria of wetla ids. This area should not be regulated under the City of Renton Regulations as it is a lower quality wetland less than 5,000 square feet. Further, the area meeting technical wetland criteria appears to be atop an area of old fill/disturbance and should be exempt from other regulatory jurisdiction on that basis as it may be artificial. METHODOLOGIES Methodology is based on a broad base of experience and understanding of the site, soil mapping and wetland delineation. The determination meets the current definition and criteria of wetlands commonly described as found in the 1987 Federal Manual and as established by the latest DOE Delineation Manual. The 1987 and 1989 federal methodologies of routine, atypical and disturbed situations were referenced to achieve the delineation. In addition, the USDA Soil Survey P. O. Pox 1337, Gig Harbor WA 98335 USA 253.858.7055 FAX 253.858.2534 3005R/,3jb/08/06/98 Manual the "USDA SCS Soil Survey of the area was used as well as the latest NHSTC Hydric Indicators. Those areas exhibiting anaerobic and saturated conditicns in the upper part for two weeks of the growing season are considered wetlands. Small isolated areas with ponding as a result of wheel compaction from farm equipment did not qualify as a wetland when the immediate surroun:ling area did not meet wetland criteria. SOIL WATER MONITORING TECHNIQUES To understand seasonal soil water relations appropriate data collection and monitor ng procedures are required. Background data collection consists of soil morphology including,redoximorphic features, depositional environment, and landforns for accurate soil water assessment. A proven techniques for determining the location of soil water levels involves careful planning. Measuring soil temperature at 19.6 inches establishes the period &t which 41°F or 5°C is exceeded. This is the temperature threshold for microbial activity to begin. The various microbes are essential to the process of iron and manganese reduction chemistry. In other words formation of redoximorphic features. Many western Washington soils exhibit high soil water levels daring the non-growing winter season. The field is monitored in the winter for advent of the growing season. Soil temperatures will likely rise and stayed above 41° F at 19.6 inches on or about March 1, thus beginning the growing season and routine water table monitoring. The water table monitoring will establish and verify a wetland determination based on monitored soil water conditions. Soil tern perature and soil water level measurements are accurately obtained in randomly located soil auger bore holes. Soil morphology including redoximorphic features is recorded at each permanent station along with the soil water levels and soil temperatures. The various strata (layers) of the depositional environment affects soil water movement and is recognized. Landform(s) and soil lanc scape age provide significant data associated with accurate soil water assessment. Measuring bore holes is repeated in the near vicinity each time but utilizing a fresh bore hole. When soil water is present the equilibration period must take into account surface water or rainwater as they may produce erroneous data. Piezometers are not used in these soil conditions due to the risk of installation failure is high. 3005R/ajb,'08/06/98 2 Finally, soil water assessment techniques on this site are complicated and required a high degree of expertise and experience in order to insure valid monitoring and interpretation. The monitoring by Registered Professional and Cert fied Professional Soil,Scientists trained in soil physic, hydrology monitoring, soil morphology, agricultural drainage, agronomy, soil mapping, and geomorphology ensure accuracy of the results. Proper interpretation of the data and results is likely to only be done by those with similar backgrounds. Soil 'nvestigation Five plots for the evaluation of wetlands were established on January 7, 1998. The live plots were representatively located across the site with Plot #5 in the lowest position in the landscape, which is the center of the area delineated. Soil logs ',Here taken at each of the locations. The ;;oil investigation found the a typical profile on the property had approximately 4 inches of a dark brown silt loam over a brown silt loam to 8 or 13 inches. Below this, the soils appeared to be either dark grayish brown or grayish brown very fine sandy loam to silt loam to about 25 inches. The site had evidence of some disturbance, but the horizonation tended to be natural. The exception is test hole #5, it had evidence of disturbance. Vegetation Vegetation of the site is a regrowth after the historic disturbance. The forested canopy of the site is made up of red alder, black cottonwood, pacific willow and scattE red Oregon ash. The scrub/shrub canopy is dominated by red dogwood, snowberry, and spirea. The herbaceous canopy is made up of reed canarygrass, and creeping buttercup with scattered sedges, soft rush and lady fern. The vine canopy is dominated by Himalayan blackberry and morning glory. Hydrology The five test plots were monitored for hydrology. The monitoring locations were obser,!ed on approximately 10-day intervals from late February until late April. In no instance was a water table or saturation in the upper part noticed in any of the holes. The area delineated as a wetland did have ponding for approximately the first 2.3 weeks of March; however, there was no water table nor saturated soils before or after this period. The wetland delineation is based solely on the surface water n the excavated and filled area in the northwest corner of the property. 3005R/a b/08/06/98 Regulated Wetlands Lower ;luality wetlands less than 5,000 square feet are exempt from regulations. These are low quality wetlands as stated under Section 4-32-3D3.a.(1) These wetlands are characterized by hydrologic isolation with the only hydrologic connection being the drainage ditch along Interstate 405. (2) The soils have been a tered as the area delineated has be excavated and backfilled. B. (1) The area delineated as a wetland is an excavated area that has been refilled, therefore there is a wetland occurring on top of fill, possibly and (2) the wetlanc is characterized by emergent vegetation consisting of willows and red . dogwoods overhanging from the margins into the delineated area with practically no vegetation growing in the delineated area. - If the wetland does not qualify as a low quality wetland through its connection along the ditch of 1-405, it would only be a Category II wetland and it is less than 2,200 square feet, being approximately 1,800 square feet. Proposed Activities and Impacts At the time of the preparation of this report, a site plan had not been formalized. It is una erstood that the intent will be to grade and clear the site with the eventual construction of a building and associated parking areas. Whereas, the wetland is not regulated by the City of Renton, there are no applicable buffers or needs for additior al mitigation. If the city's requirements have changed such that some mitigation is required, this will be done through mitigation banking or similar activity if necessary. We will wait on the city's response with regard to additional agency involvement. • Si e , A. . redber 3005R/ajb,'08/06/98 4 TABLE 1 MONITORING RESULTS Depth to water table in inches Da•:e 1 2 3 4 5 1r 44" 43" 40" None to 44" 28" 2/1 ) No water to 24" 43" 40" None to 44" 28" 3;/3 No water to 24" 43" 40" None to 44" Flooded 3/13 No water to 24" 43" 40" None to 44" Flooded 3/26 No water to 24" 43" 40" None to 44" No water to 24" 4/9 No water to 24" 43" 40" None to 44" No water to 24" 4/2:3 No water to 24" 43" 40" None to 44" No water to 24" • • 3005FJajb/08/06/98 5 1Y rn Any 3 A 4 �: SW 16th ST. 0 SITE -01- - a 'l VICINITY MAP • FIGURE 1: VICINITY MAP NESS HOLDING COMPANY SW 16TH STREET B&A, INC. #3005 - _ -I I 6 , 5 I , II I Ig 8 1 I I + I � 1 i 10 + + 1 1 1 1 1 13 1 L ! -I-- I APPROX.�OCATION _OT DITCH _--I--'- {� - � I NB64 4B" . _41 6' ��OT SURVE7ED� CH: UNK _ I ,e -J \ Hasa , 19 • ,- •, / • s.4 152 • me _ I X a, �� • ,so 1s,z • 60 W00D ft / I --- I I- I I FENCE 1 i 1`' i I/ I 1 20 40 I� #12.2 , _ 1 ,sa 9g /1 -I - U 1ores, L . - ' 1 , 1 , /,4:7 34 I I �� �7.2 I 14.4 4 I ...-- gilli u • !?_/�• I ( lss - - - - - - - 17.6• U I I . 1 17.4 1 t8.44y - Jy •p,., i98 I I _ +I I I •I I ,So 33 0 w % A127 r �� Z i i' ; I 14 1 I I D r I • • j I �6 ,�/2i 2.7 ' 1s7- • - - - - - - - - - - • - - I W - + i J W 07 f 1 / 115.9 . 15.9 I 14.6 - 16.o • N .� //'� - 18.5 ! Q I rn �? W -/- - - I. - 32 I o "� W I SCALE: 1" = 40' I r • N Cr i m 15.6• • I a N 0 ' I 31 I 16.1 Cr) I- 17.7 "� o 2 CD I a_ • A ,,,.. 16 2 r G I f- Z gt • I 1r ! J w a ,s.2 /•� IS.D /4.9 30 16.D . ,6.7 + Z w x ' 1a.0V • 17.4 + I J p W I ."(rt fi • - -II - - - - 11.1-3 T7.4 ,el4 ,e 2W (�iCH. UNK Jl az �S6 1s4 I J1r- 1 r - r - '� - - - r- • - - J I Q Z 03 I »; t i • I ! I ! + �jJZ1 1 I a ° I- x x i �o�; J I J I I 1 J I I ! ,� I co � p �- I I • I + JMillre J 14.6 + • 17.e I 17.o I !.p W • I 1 1 1 1 I 1 tn `nc� I 11e.41 I j 16.1 ��p 1 14.0•• ,6.G 17.2 ,T 1 ,e e z 1 4.S N I 1 1 I I I I z I iC., �� i I I I I I I I I I I I I 20 40 • ,o.� EC EC m 13 7 • • • 17.e 1 I„ 1 60 7 J �1 1 19 120 I 21 1 22 1 i 1 J , I TOE L e I 23 ' 24 + 25 0 + 26 1 27 I 28 J 29 1 1 .� ��� ---- �.$ + mob' I • �6- - - I --____ ---------- 1ae Q$z1.< e �,.e- n21.e -7;--- - -_fig - 1 1 12.3 389.69' 1.2 n21.0 21.0 �, TOP `'� r!,_ CONC. pAD 20.a - �'� ?, • --- (TYP.) ' o SSMH ---------- ---- - J IM EL 21.4 -?�� r LE 5.9 EbSTINC 2�_ - - c, o t•• 20.0- - - CATCH BASIN N89'26'S9"E S. W. 16 th STREET I J E7asnr,c 1 RIV. 20.7 J 24' LE 14.4 - SSW i EXtSTINC RIM EL 21.2 L CATCH B�51N o I.E. 6-6 RIM EL 20.4 M 24 I.E. is n C. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE •17° 0' __ R.4 E. R.5 E. �sEarrcE(CITY Po.l la ML1Q jp" • •t. ----- .:ILWI :r.ri.44.W. ,nei :-'A'•-•r----L-----'."...L•Zaii. •" -..:i. g ! I .,..., , .owli _.....,..,:s._ ,i, - BI• 1vIatiti 1 r ,,,•. a 1 :. -N 1 v l . .. ate`•a. • 1'll i -� .1 j: Er il Ili No`�a. -, 7 ,f •.` `\\� aII. 0: ,t 1 • ' i 1 t ,I BI�1 River . .: t., . ►',,• I �' 0 11 1. ' �: -�.,•: . • fie•. •1 .9 � 1; +z:�: is • re— iill I I �� ra I •� :ucsta'' BM' , �i�� '� +, EieldCR: 1 .` _.. .ypJ —.0.1044"� • COBeC r3• • �� �1 . T+ 1 • yI C 'f 8e0 • I. BeG �;+..` a:IaLJ.. .rc 't "i ;e1 lilli ig S • ✓ t.r3)a,f. '� . ip . •, �Ia O d� • ••c.e _, I� . p t• p IF _ ` yc' �•„..„.. : . :_s ` - •: 'Z �� C f "I,' -- ,.... - ----- _ ;.. ®�1/' _1,. Ng. P1� ufi\ 13 �' ,� j i I !- L'•, .f , / I j_ I 4 BeC Golfourse 44t >•y� ill I ( `' Ii .?tq"1"I�vita I_�� ti c 141 A I�Sew Be ck ^0�'a►+� • = r ; v.`,. a \ u Dis•• al - - - �d. /�I-116,i' ■ . gill 6,77,4r1). k. I' Ir% 2 Ur i ii •M 16 + +/ 1 ', .� .L I / r.��_� 1I f Pu 11- _ .• . L w ,•.1iIs• I of •1+{Q\\ •I• ] ._•:/ �� . •��� :Lon .Pu \ �Ai�j o eacrei �2— • I :i.. �' 105 r pi :IJr`,ei - - �� :.►, Ur •...� •1.Wo. :eD •• -•.. ' . ,r,�� 1 all ems ' =I .■ • x II u I ..' Track ..I I •� •. .1 , eg Url 1 I :u i Ur y-/ r i x le jSO II •Tu Z - y . wa • M • FIGURE 3: KING COUNTY SOIL SURVEY . • I N SS HOLDING COMPANY • 1 '0 : •:AABM:4: �.t'. •�• 16fl 203; ^ '• a SW 16TH STREET P, 1 • Ir,-* 3&A. INC #3005 Sit.- •II. -•, ;' I�r a I DATA FORM 1 Routine Wetland Determination , (WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or 1987 Corps Wetland Delineation Manual)_ Project/Site: rcw / (-Ft r0.0� L Date: / /9 OaA Applicant/owner: d 5 ` PP 2 S ��D i✓� o County: K-,ig - Investigator(s): e C F4 A S Q State: w,? SIT/R: 2/./ .2 3.t//5/g Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ( �s no Community ) Is the site significantly disturbed(atypical situation)? �e� no Transect ID: �� 3- Is the area a potential Problem Area? yes () _ Plot ID: VEGETATION — Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species- Stratum Indicator c c, !t Boa d Sec p Fj.Lw )0 cor �•Aet y S r4G� — SRee, s l zt,t)4 '1 q fass /T G -r.¢GW HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: %of dominants OBL,FACW,&FAC: ?S - Check all indicators that apply&explain below: - Regional knowledge of plant communities Wetland plant list(nat'1 or regional) ✓ OTHER Physiological or reproductive adaptations Morphological adaptations Technical Literature Wetland Plant Data Base - Hydrophytic vegetation present? yes no Rationale for decision/Remarks: HYDROLOGY Is it the growing season? yes 8ci Water Marks: yes no Sediment Deposits: yes no Based on: cle.,-/e- $ reap Drift Lines: yes no Drainage Patterns: yes no Dept. of inundation: inches Oxidized Root(live roots) Local Soil Survey: yes no Channels <12 in. yes no Depth to free water in pit: inches FAC Neutral: yes no Water-stained �, Leaves: yes no Depth to saturated soil: -2`( inches Check all that apply &explain below: Other. Stream,Lake or gage data: Aerial photographs: Other: Wetland hydrology present? yes no Rationale for decision/Remarks: 1 t mess SOILS . Map Unit Name 564,l�c,.✓ 1 Drainage Class Mo g• W 4a- l (Series & Phase) Field observations confirm alp No i Taxonomy (subgroup) mapped type? Profile Description Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors Mottle abundance Texture, concretions, Drawing of soil (inches) (Munsell (Munsell size&contrast structure,etc. profile moist) moist) (match description) o -, (4 A �o r�3f S-C 4-t—t3 i & to iici6 (� �� Y.es'l3 �',S YK G t 4d F lisso s l3-t '( r�� 5,L i at -2-1- 6,i. 2.,s(tqlz f( i. • .27-Yo C. s 66,Yfz " M / d .v.Psc. Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) _ Histosol Concretions __Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List __Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other(explain in remarks) Hydric soils present? yes 19 Rationale for decision/Remark �Gc s: L kS / C. /I-o t. G- Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? es no Hydric soils present? yes g Is the sampling point • yes Wetland hydrology present? yes within a wetland? Rationale/Remarks: NOTES: t DATA FORM 1 Routine Wetland Determination (WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or 1987 Corps Wetland Delineation Manual) Project/Site: rcw /6 elf 0"o.�/ Date: / 0 Oa a Applicant/owner: de i 5 /7/O /d i �/q C o County: Jl-fg Investigator(s): P 14 $ A IQ J SITIR:State: w� ,Z ��',� 1 3-v/Yg Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ( no Community ID: Is the site significantly disturbed(atypical situation)? (7 no Transect ID: �.z,z Is the area a potential Problem Area? yes () Plot ID: VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator_ P, A A icier S,4 ,¢c Cc? 140,,) ioc d g4c W HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: of dominants OBL,FACW, &FAC: 6 d Check all indicators that apply&explain below: Regional knowledge of plant communities Wetland plant list(nat'l or regional) cJ OTHER Physiological or reproductive adaptations Morphological adaptations Technical Literature Wetland Plant Data Base Hydrophytic vegetation present? a no • Rationale for decision/Remarks: HYDROLOGY Is it the growing season? i I yes C Water Marks: yes no Sediment Deposits: yes no Based on: awl-G Drift Lines: yes no Drainage Patterns: yes no Dept. of inundation: inches Oxidized Root(live roots) Local Soil Survey: yes no Channels<12 in. yes no Depth to free water in pit: inches FAC Neutral: yes no Water-stained Leaves: yes no Depth to saturated soil: '2 ' inches Check all that apply &explain below: Other. Stream, Lake or gage data: Aerial photographs: Other: Wetland hydrology present? yes (to Rationale for decision/Remarks: S /1/eS5 SOILS . Map Unit Name cif ` roc AJ ��/(`� �li_ Drainage Class te_________4 � 6o f (Series & Phase) Field observations confirm No Taxonomy (subgroup) mapped type? Profile Description Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors Mottle abundance Texture,concretions, Drawing of soil (inches) (Munsell (Munsell size&contrast structure, etc. profile moist) moist) (match description) °— Y A /J-f e 34 s, L `c- $3 4g 'orRYW3 • $ t `Z -22 6 Z, 5 Yfriz '1.5- 5-/ fit 1 t .22- B 566 etb Ai ,j U�SL ›-Y6--1- G 5-6GY /1 !d it Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) Histosol Concretions __Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils __Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils _ Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List __Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List __Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other(explain in remarks) Hydric soils present? \) no �` Rationale for decision/Remarks: �� n _ G� �i�� . cox �y ..� G�'�� /02 Wetland Determination (circle) . Hydrophytic vegetation present? a no ` n Hydric soils present? no Is the sampling point yes o . Wetland hydrology present? yes 6, within a wetland? Rationale/Remarks: • NOTES: t DATA FORM 1 • Routine Wetland Determination , (WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or 1987 Corps Wetland Delineation Manual) Project/Site: ecw /6 re /PRE"o.k/ Date: / / /9 8 Applicant/owner: /(/e i 5 6/6 I d t i✓Gl C o . County: 1-,� J State: 4,4 g Investigator(s): k C 14 $ A T Q S/T/R: Y .2 3.4//I/g Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? (yes') no Community lD Is the site significantly disturbed(atypical situation)? es no Transect ID: 7# 3 Is the area a potential Problem Area? yes () Plot ID: VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Qe d 4/Ier s,¢ M6 Q� �-er- 4wp 1�r F4e� G., # wod J /cIt. Reed '`fit_Tri, itI,tw S c> to ?i.ei-r,1 Si/ f-4ew g;, A Le.&derpel Ur ,4CIV HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: %of dominants OBL,FACW, &FAC: Check all indicators that apply&explain below: Regional knowledge of plant communities Wetland plant list(nat'I or regional) OTHER Physiological or reproductive adaptations Morphological adaptations Technical Literature Wetland Plant Data Base • Hydrophytic vegetation present? /ys� no • Rationale for decision/Remarks: � HYDROLOGY Is it the growing season? yes /�io� Water Marks: yes no Sediment Deposits: yes no Based on: C Drift Lines: yes no Drainage Patterns: yes no Dept.of inundation: inches Oxidized Root(live roots) Local Soil Survey: yes no Channels<12 in. yes no Depth to free water in pit: inches FAC Neutral: yes no Water-stained 4 Leaves: yes no Depth to saturated soil: >0Z41 inches Check all that apply&explain below: Other: Stream, Lake or gage data: Aerial photographs: Other: Wetland hydrology present? yes no Rationale for decision/Remarks: t -�. I .t r - .�•k .....::..,'-`;?!':-I'''' . :;�. ��:* .T. :- ."%.!' .ti . .0 . • .•! . , _:r. ..• .. s.. fin. •,' a..V _.. . 1—(• � ^ .T: �;L�. •c.n.wafia '_ :.�:.;:y:\['v:.t•.�rifl. —.l. ,;.:i } 1�Yt w-?Y, . .! .:�• � 1.r..; ` •j,:'':/�.? ;.::t. •jht.: �,, : :. :, i .4:• •3 _ -t f;,',':iz r"113' .74•1.:: • foiu.7 "1'. -4. .-- i .:f Report o:n.Trip :Generation: . ., ...-.. . • . ,.. .:-.. .. , ..-. • . Candlewood Hotels • • ,.., • = - k - .Wichita, Omaha and .Denv-er ' • •' August 1997 I : . f'•y T L•.- • - r.. K .-Y • •'7 , • •`� �.rR raj r. • • . ` '.r. i:' :r.. •TRAFFIC la :6 -,'„1.'.!.` ,• Wit..•. •• •J .. t i 'mot•.l F.:•' •' • (. ' .. . • Produced by: s JOHNSON'&ASSOCIATES, INC. a 5520 NORTHCFRANCIS AVENUE <„ • OKLAHOMA CITY,OKLAHOMA 73118 '' VOICE.: (405)843-8075 •FAX: (405)843-8078 • www.okcoline.com!jo!Irscn t�iis3..c,..:<w>:or..: :.:<..-«,.�x: :.:a«: ...w«.ec..ca./ca:•• ...........:...... ..•;:';�:'.^':.:._'^^'?k:'«:2:;wr�'..:SQ:�:�ii'a+•'i�ii:<:�'i:2 <s,,.. . . ik •• { �::: •�. .. f:' ':ti"9i:�i':"•i'->}ii:.:'w ........ ...+.!.a:..i.»Vw.• s '.y.:.k+:::Y:.$."�" i..iY . : v.+Yt"iK:iu':i1!Avaa' :: 1i . TABLK OF CONTENTS Report on Trip Generation for Candlewood Hotels at Wichita, Omaha and Denver I. Introduction 1 II. Executive Summary -2 III. Wichita Site Summary 6 IV. Omaha Site Summary 9 V. Denver Site Summary 12 Report on Trip Generation for Candlewood Hotels at Wichita, Omaha and Denver I. Introduction This report contains summaries of trip generation data recorded for Candlewood Hotels at locations in three metropolitan areas during 10-day periods of OGtober 1996 and June 1997. All data were collected using International Traffic Corporation recording devices with counter tubes placed across entry drives at the three sites. Hotels at each site were in full operation during the monitoring period. Tabulated data presented here indicate that trip generation rates at each site were lower than that compiled in Trip Generation (Fifth Edition) published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. Trip-end data compiled by Johnson & Associates staff during extended monitoring periods at operating Candlewood Hotels at Wichita, Kansas; Omaha, Nebraska; and Denver, Colorado; appear throughout this report. Compiled data cover at least one weekend and all five weekdays for each site. All measurments were taken during non- holiday periods. ITE trip generation rates for business hotels, 1'I'h heading 312, estimated daily rates of 7.27 trips per occupied hotel unit per day. ITE data estimated peak hour trip generation rates at 0.56 (AM) and 0.57 (PM), trips per occupied hotel unit per hour. ITE weekday peak hours were reported between 7:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m. Trip end data recorded at the three sites were verified and adjusted based on real-time field counts taken at each site during the monitoring periods. Raw data were assembled for this report using TASLITE traffic management software. Standard deviations for collected Candlewood data upon which this report is based ranged from 0.12 to 0.75. Standard deviations for ITE data(3 locations) were reported at 0.76. Total trip ends as tabulated in this report were continuously measured and recorded by electronic counters placed each location over periods of at least 10 days. The collected trip end data were correlated with the number of occupied rooms for each day the trip counters were in place, as reported by Candlewood management. Measured Candlewood trip end data were compiled in such a way as to match ITE compilations as closely as possible. 1 II. Executive Summary The collected Candlewood data presented in this report indicate trip generation rates generation rates significantly lower than that predicted by appying ITE rates. TABLE 1a: Candlewood Trip Generation Per Occupied Room (Combined - Daily), on the following page, shows the combined result of trip data collected at Candlewood Hotels located in Wichita, Omaha and Denver. Data for individual sites has been included in additional tabulated forms in this report. Weekday trip generation rates measured at the three Candlewood sites came to a daily average of 4.28 trips per occupied room, 41 percent less than the 7.27 trips per occupied room reported in the ITE Trip Generation book. The maximum weekday trip generation rate showin in TABLE la of the Candlewood data was 4.78 trips per occupied-room, 34 percent less than the ITE daily rate. In TABLE 3a: Trip Generation Compared, generation rates developed from the Candlewood data are applied to hotels of six sizes, ranging from 80 units to 150 units. The tabulation assumes that all units will be occupied and that trip generation rates will remain constant for the estimating period (one day). Based on the assembled trip generation data, a 122-unit Candlewood Hotel (the most typical size under development) may be expected to result in a total of 522 trip ends per day. Applying ITh generation rates for a business hotel of 122 units results in an estimate of 887 trips ends per day, 365 trip ends more than substantiated by the Candlewood rate of 4.28 trips per occupied room per day. Candlewood data for peak hour trip generation rates appear in TABLE lb: Candlewood Trip Generation Per Occupied Room (Combined - Peak). Peak hour trip generation data collected at each of the Candlewood site are consistent wiith daily rates, indicating significantly less trip generation than developed with ITE data. TABLE lb appears on the second following page. Weekday morning peak hours for the Candlewood data and the ITE data were between 7:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m. Afternoon peak data for weekdays were recorded between 4:00 p.m. and 6:00 p.m. for both Candlewood and ITE data. Peak hour rates as measured at the three Candlewood Hotel sites came to an AM average of 0.45 trips per occupied room, compared to 0.56 per occupied room for the ITE AM peak hour data. The Candlewood peak hour trip generation rate is a reduction of approximately 19.8 percent from the ITE AM peak. Afternoon data for Candlewood sites came to 0.48 trips per occupied room, compared to 0.57 trips per occupied room for the ITE PM data. The Candlewood trip generation rate is approximately 16.6 percent lower than the PM ITE rate. 2 •..-yy anr, . �1 TABLE 1 a: Candlewood Trip Generation Per Occupied Room (Combined -Daily) AM PM Daily Day of Trip Trip Trip Occupied AM Avg PM Avg Daily Avg Dates Week Ends Ends Ends Rooms Rate Rate Rate • Oct. 11, June 13, June 20 Friday 409 676 1085 236 1.73 2.86 4.60 Oct. 12, June 14, June 21 Saturday 205 579 784 213 0.96 2.72 3.68 Oct. 13, June 15, June 22 Sunday 202 565 767 263 0.77 2.15 2.92 Oct. 14, June 16, June 23 Monday 286 940 1226 316 0.91 2.97 3.88 Oct. 15, June 17, June 24 Tuesday 408 1015 1423 343 1.19 2.96 4.15 Oct. 16, June 18, June 25 Wednesday _ 391 1006 1397 349 1.12 2.88 4.00 Oct. 17, June 121 June 19 Thursday 428 926 1354 283 _ 1.51 3.27 4.78 TABLE 2a: Percent Difference of Daily Rates ITE Daily Candlewood Daily Percent Difference 7.27 4.28 41.09% , TABLE 3a: Trip Generation Compared s Numerical Differences Assuming All Units Occupied No. Hotel Candlewood ITE Numerical Units Daily Daily Difference 80 343.00 582.00 239.00 • 98 420.00 712.00 292.00 110 471.00 800.00 329.00 122 522.00 887.00 365.00 134 574.00 974.00 400.00 150 642.00 1091.00 449.00 • V1f-41'.0.+•'•it . VV`1NTey:N.•. TABLE lb: Candlewood Trip Generation Per Occupied Room (Combined - Peak) AM PM Number Day of Trip Trip Occupied AM Peak PM Peak Dates Week Ends Ends Rooms Rate Rate Oct. 11, June 13, June 20 Friday 116 101 236 0.49 0.43 Oct. 12, June 14, June 21 Saturday 58 91 213 0.27 0.43 Oct. 13, June 15, June 22 Sunday 68 67 263 0.26 0.25 Oct. 14, June 16, June 23 Monday 117 160 316 0.37 0.51 Oct. 15, June 17, June 24 Tuesday 145 167 343 0.42 0.49 Oct. 16, June 18, June 25 Wednesday 168 158 349 0.48 0.45 Oct. 17, June 12, June 19 Thursday 136 142 283 0.48 0.50 TABLE 2b: Percent Difference of Peak Rates ITE AM Peak Candlewood AM Peak Percent Difference 0.56 0.45 -19.77% • ITE PM Peak Candlewood PM Peak Percent Difference 0.57 0.48 -16.64% TABLE 3b: Trip Generation Compared - Numerical Differences Assuming All Units Occupied No. Hotel Candlewood Trip Data ITE Trip Data Numerical Differences Units AM Peak PM Peak AM Peak PM Peak AM Peak PM Peak 80 36.00 38.00 45.00 46.00 9,00 10.00 98 44.00 47.00 55.00 56.00 11.00 12.00 110 49.00 52.00 - 62.00 63.00 13.00 14.00 122 55,00 58.00 68.00 70.00 13.00 15.00 134 60.00 64.00 75.00 76.00 15.00 16.00 150 67,00 71.00 84.00 86.00 17.00 19.00 ••avR"ei:R.s,,•, i • CornposiLe : AM `Neekday Peak Hour Trip Generation Per Occupied Room .. • 60 - r I I I I I , 1 U 55 X ' 1 C W _ I Q I L_ 50 — . F— 1 I I _ • x 1 X I I U I 1 . 45 - x ' n l I I W I 1 a) I I 1 0 40 J L , L 1 �L7� x I x I W ' I I I I > - I I , I I I I I I I I I I 35 J J ' L 1 1 I I 1 I I I I 1 I I 1 ' I I 1 I I • 30 L J I I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I I I t I I 1 I I I 1 I 1 1 ) 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 X = Number of Occupied Rooms Fitted Power Curve T=a*xAb Composite : Ply Weekday Peak Hour Trip Generation Per Occupied Room 70 - C 60 Q F— x 02 5 0 L L • U I (g, x ' 40 - L L L L O 0) > x II 30 J L J L L 1 H- 20 L 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 X = Number of Occupied Rooms Fitted Power Curve T=a*x^b I Tabulated daily trip generation data for each of the three Candlewood sites are included 1 in Tables Ic, Id and le. In each case, measured Candlewood trip generation rates per occupied room are lower than published ITE rates, as shown in the following compilation: 1 Location Candlewood 1TE Diff. (pct) Wichita 5.39 7.27 25.8%. 1 Omaha 3.90 7.27 46.4% Denver 3.93 7.27 45.9% Combined 4.28 7.27 - 41.1% iPeak hour trip,generation data for the individual Candlewood site are compiled in Tables 1f, lg and 1h. The tabulated peak morning hour data indicate that trip generation rates at Candlewood sites ranged from 7.7 percent lower than the ITE rate(0.56 trips per occupied room) at Denver to 31.8 percent lower at Wichita. Afternoon peak hour rates for the i Candlewood sites ranged from 5.2 percent lower than the ITE value(0.57 trips per occupied room) at the Wichita site to 25 percent lower at the Denver site. Individual site peak hour rates are shown in the following compilation: ICandtewood ITE Difference (pct) Location AM/PM AM/PM AM/PM I Wichita 0.38/0.54 0.56/0.57 31.8%/ 5.2% Omaha 0.42/0.48 0.56/0.57 25.0%/16.6% Denver 0.52/0.43 0.56/0.57 7.7%/25.0% ICombined 0.45/0.48 0.56/0.57 19.8%/16.6% Based on the data presented in this report, trip generation rates for Candlewood Hotels may reliably be anticipated at lesser rates than those produced by applying ITE trip generation _rates. The range of reduced trip generation found in counts at each site varied from 7.7 percent I to 31.8 percent for AM peak hours and from 5.2 percent to 25 percent for PM peak hours. Combined rate reductions ranged from 16.6 percent to 19.8 percent. Overall, traffic loads generated by the Candlewood sites was less than predicted by ITE Idata. This was true for peak hour rates and for daily generation rates. In planning and implementing traffic management strategies for Candlewood sites, this data may be of value in I ascertaining the need for warrant studies and the likely level of traffic impact a municipality may anticipate as a result of construction of a facility of this nature. I I 1 5 I • M. Wichita Site Summary Candlewood data collected for the Wichita, Kansas, site showed a daily weekday average trip-end rate of 5.39 trips per occupied room, 25.8 percent less than the 7.27 trips per occupied room from the ITE data. The tabulated Wichita daily (weekday and weekend) totals appear in TABLE lc: Candlewood Trip Generation Per Occupied Room (Wichita - Daily), on the following page. Applying the measured weekday rate to a standard 122-unit Candlewood Hotel, the total number of trip-ends estimated at complete occupancy is 658 trips per day, as shown in TABLE 3c: Trip Generation Rates Compared - Numericla Differences Assuming All Units Occupied. The ITE weekday rate for a similar facility will be 887 trips, 229 trips more than the Candlewood data will support. Data compiled in TABLE 2f: Percent Difference of Peak Rates, indicate that weekday peak hour rates for the Wichita Candlewood site ranged from 5.2 percent less than the 1TE weekday peak hour rate, to 31.8 percent less than the ITE rate. TABLE if: Candlewood Trip Generation Per Occupied Room (Wichita- Peak), summarizes the weekday and weekend trip end data for AM Peak hours (7:00 a.m. - 9:00 p.m.) and for PM Peak Hours (4:00 p.m- 6:00 p.m.). Tabulated data in TABLE 3f: Trip Generation Compared - Numerical Differences Assuming All Units Occupied, show that weekday peak hour trip generation rates applied to a standard 122-unit Candlewood Hotel will produce a typical weekday morning total of 46 trip ends per hour. This compares to a total of 68 trip ends per hour for the ITE peak weekday morning rate of 0.56 trip ends per occupied room. Afternoon peak hour rates for the same Candlewood hotel, based on the measured data, will be expected to produce 66 trip ends for the normal weekday. ITE data indicate a total of 70 trip ends for a weekday afternoon peak hour for a 122-unit hotel. In all three cases -weekday morning peak hour, weekday afternoon peak hour and weekday daily total volume- the collected Candlewood data indicated trip generation rates lower than that shown in the ITE Trip Generation publication. 6 TABLE lc: Candlewood Trip Generation Per Occupied Room (Wichita - Daily) AM PM Daily . Day Trip Trip Trip Occupied AM Avg PM Avg Daily Avg Date of Week Ends Ends Ends Rooms Rate Rate Rate • Oct. 11 Friday 121 226 347 58 2.09 3.90 5.98 Oct. 12 Saturday 53 195 248 55 0.96 3.55 4.51 Oct 13 Sunday 82 155 237 . 53 . .1.55 . 2.92 4.47 Oct. 14 Monday 84 274 358 75 1.12 3.65 4.77 Oct. 15 Tuesday 129 359 488 94 1.37 3.82 5.19 Oct. 16 Wednesday 123 309 432 93 1.32 3.32 4.65 • Oct. 17 Thursday 106 314 420 66 1.61 4.76 6.36 TABLE 2c: Percent Difference of Daily Rates ITE Daily Candlewood Daily 5.39 Percent Difference 7.27 -25.84% _ TABLE 3c: Trip Generation Rates Compared Numerical Differences Assuming All Units Occupied No. Hotel Candlewood ITE Numerical Units Daily Daily Difference 80 431.00 582.00 151.00 98 528.00 712.00 184.00 110 593.00 800.00 207.00 122 658.00 887.00 229.00 134 722.00 974.00 252.00 150 809.00 1091.00 282.00 TABLE 1 f: Candlewood Trip Generation Per Occupied Room (Wichita - Peak) AM Peak PM Peak Day Trip Trip Occupied AM Peak PM Peak Date of Week Ends Ends Rooms Rate Rate . Oct. 11 Friday 29 24 58 0.50 0.41 Oct. 12 Saturday 15 28 55 0.27 0.51 Oct. 13 Sunday 30 21 53 0.57 0.40 . Oct. 14 Monday 19 45 75 0.25 0.60 Oct. 15 Tuesday 32 _ 56 94 0.34 0,60 ' Oct. 16 Wednesday 42 48 93 0.45 0.52 Oct. 17 Thursday 24 38 66 0,36 0.58 TABLE 2f: Percent Difference of Peak Rates ITE AM Peak Candlewood AM Peak Percent Difference 0.56 0.38 -31.82% ITE PM Peak Candlewood PM Peak Percent Difference 0.57 0.54 -5.21% TABLE 3f: Trip Generation Compared - Numerical Differences Assuming All Units Occupied No. Hotel Candlewood Trip Data ITE Trip Data Numerical Differences Units AM Peak PM Peak AM Peak PM Peak AM Peak PM Peak 80 30.00 43.00 45.00 46.00 15.00 3.00 98 37.00 53.00 55.00 56.00 18.00 3.00 110 42.00 59.00 62.00 63.00 20.00 4.00 122 46.00 66.00 68.00 70.00 22.00 4.00 134 51.00 72.00 75.00 76.00 24.00 4.00 150 57.00 81.00 84.00 86.00 27.00 5.00 , t••.w.__....1.y..`"ynTr.'mete Wichita : AV Weekday Peak Hour :_.r „.y....._.. Trip Generation Per Occupied Room 5 I I 1 , 42 r r r r I 1 I 1 I 1 40 I I T 1 , I - 38 _IL -I L i 1 I • W 1 1 I 1 Q 6 1 1 e 1 L_ I 1 1 I 34 I ' 1-- r 't r r r 1 I I I _a) I I I I 32 I ' U , r r--jC r r 11 I a) 3 0 I , I , - X : X I 1 a) 28 ' 1 -I I. L L /---� 1 1 I 1 0' I I I I I 1 I , 0 26 — i- .. t L- I 1 I , a) - 1 I 1 I I > 2 4 _ I I I I 1 Q L r r r r 1 1 I I I I I I I 1 I 1 22 I 1 I I 1 I I 1 1 1 I I 1 20 •— _, L J L L I 1 I 1 1 1 I X 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 18 -1 I- -1 4 1 I I _ 1 I I 1 1 I. 1 I I J 50 60 70 80 . 90 100 110 120 130 140 X = Number of Occupied Rooms Fitted Power Curve T=o*xAb 0 Wichita : PM Weekday Peak Hour Trip Generation Per Occupied Room 1 00 I r r I I I - I 1 I I 90 (n W 80 - Q) 70 1 L J L J 60 • 0 50 r • X nl X � I W I I \ I I 4-0 — I 1 X I I I • f- 30 I I 1 I I I • I I I 20 1 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 X = Number of Occupied Rooms Fitted Power Curve T=a*x^b • IV. Omaha Site Summary Candlewood data collected for the Omaha, Nebraska, site showed a daily weekday i average trip-end rate of 3.90 trips per occupied room, 46.4 percent less than the 7.27 trips per occupied room from the ITE data. The tabulated Omaha daily (weekday and weekend) totals appear in TABLE 1.d: Candlewood Trip Generation Per Occupied Room (Omaha - Daily), on the following page. Applying the measured weekday rate to a standard 122-unit Candlewood Hotel, the total number of trip-ends estimated at complete occupancy is 476 trips per day, as shown in TABLE 3d: Trip Generation Rates Compared - Numerical Differences Assuming All Units Occupied. The ITE weekday rate for a similar facility will be 887 trips, 411 trips more 11 than the Candlewood data will support. Data compiled in TABLE 2g: Percent Difference of Peak Rates, indicate that {{1 weekday peak hour rates for the Omaha Candlewood site ranged from 16.6 percent less than 1 the ITE weekday peak hour rate, to 25.0 percent less than the ITE rate. TABLE ig: Candlewood Trip Generation Per Occupied Room (Omaha - Peak), 1 summarizes the weekday and weekend trip end data for AM Peak hours (7:00 a.m. - 9:00 p.m.) and for PM Peak Hours (4:00 p.m 6:00 p.m.). Tabulated data in TABLE 3g: Trip Generation Compared - Numerical Differences Assuming All Units Occupied, show that weekday peak hour trip generation rates applied to a standard 122-unit Candlewood Hotel will produce a typical weekday morning total of 51 trip ends per hour. This compares to a total of 68 trip ends per hour for the 11'h peak weekday morning rate of 0.56 trip ends per occupied room. Afternoon peak hour rates for the same Candlewood hotel, based on the measured data, will be expected to produce 58 trip ends for the normal weekday. im data indicate a . total of 70 trip ends for weekday afternoon peak hour for a 122-unit hotel. In all three cases -weekday morning peak hour, weekday afternoon peak hour and weekday daily total volume- the collected Candlewood data indicated trip generation rates lower than that shown in the ITE Trip Generation publication. 1 1 9 --- •--- .--.. r-=1 ---- - - . ..` TABLE 1 d: Candlewood Trip Generation Per Occupied Room (Omaha - Daily) AM PM Daily -Day Trip Trip Trip Occupied AM Avg PM Avg Daily Avg Date of Week Ends Ends Ends Rooms Rate Rate Rate • . June 13 Friday 143 211 354 87 1.64 2.43 4.07 June 14 Saturday 62 189 251 86 0.72 2.20 2.92 June 15 Sunday 36 199 235 103 0.35 1.93 2.28 June 16 Monday _ 91 316 407 119 0.76 2.66 3.42 June 17 Tuesday 148 328 476 118 1.25 2.78 4.03 June 18 Wednesday 152 337 489 130 1.17 2.59 3.76 June 12 Thursday 162 264 426 - 101 1.60 2.61 4.22 TABLE 2d: Percent Difference of Daily Rates ITE Daily Candlewood Daily Percent Difference 7.27 3.90 -46.35% TABLE 3d: Trip Generation Rates Compared Numerical Differences Assuming All Units Occupied No. Hotel Candlewood ITE Units DAILY DAILY Difference 80 312.00 582.00 , 270.00 98 382.00 712.00 330.00 110 429.00 800.00 371.00 122 476.00 887.00 411.00 134 523.00 974.00 451.00 150 585.00 1091.00 506.00 _ i 5 TABLE 1 g: Candlewood Trip Generation Per Occupied Room (Omaha - Peak Hour) AM Peak PM-Peak No. Day Trip Trip Occupied AM Peak PM Peak Date of Week Ends Ends Rooms Rate Rate . June 13 Friday 42 40 87 0.48 0.46 June 14 Saturday 23 30 86 0.27 0.35 June 15 Sunday 10 26 103 0.10 0.25 . June 16 Monday 36 66 119 0.30 0.55 June 17 Tuesday 47 59 118 0.40 0,50 ' June 18 Wednesday 56 58 130 0.43 0.45 ,, June 12 Thursday 49 42 101 0.49 0.42 TABLE 2g: Percent Difference of Peak Rates ITE AM Peak Candlewood AM Peak Percent Difference 0.56 0.42 -25.02% ITE PM Peak Candlewood PM Peak Percent Difference 0.57 0.48 -16.62% TABLE 3g: Trip Generation Compared - Numerical Differences Assuming All Units Occupied Occupied Candlewood Trip Data ITE Trip Data Differences Units AM Peak PM Peak AM Peak PM Peak AM Peak PM Peak 80 34.00 38.00 45.00 46.00 11.00 8.00 98 41.00 47.00 55.00 56,00 14.00 9.00 110 46.00 52.00 62.00 63.00 16.00 11.00 122 51,00 58.00 68.00 70.00 17.00 12.00 134 56.00 64.00 75.00 76.00 19.00 12.00 150 63.00 71.00 84.00 86.00 21.00 15.00 : :. • Omaha : Avl Weekday Peak Hour Trip Generation •Per Occupied Room • I I 57 - I I r r r r I — I I >1/ I 55 - I I 1 1 r 1 I rI II • I T I I 1 - 53 r -� ' r r r 1 LLJ _ I 1 I a 5 1 - 1- I I I -1 F -I y1 1- 1 1 I I I I 1— I I I I a) 49 J L J L i 1 I I 1 I HITcTiT —1 �, I 1 I I I I I I I I X I I I I I I 35 J L J L 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 X = Number of Occupied Rooms Fitted Power Curve T=a*x^b • Omaha : Pv Weekday Peak. Hour Trip Generation Per Occupied Room • 70 - r r r r U) c 60 • - • w • 0 a) 5 0 - L 1 U_ (i) (a] a, 4 0 _ J L X L L 0 a) > II 30 J J L 1 1 H 0 1 L 1 1 1 1 . !/ \/50 60 70 80 90 1 00 1 1 0 1 20 1 30 1 40 X = Number of Occupied Rooms Fitted Power Curve T=a*x^b I V. Denver Site Summary Candlewood data collected for the Denver, Colorado, site showed a daily weekday I average trip-end rate of 3.93 trips per occupied room, 45.9 percent less than the 7.27 trips per occupied room from the ITE data. The tabulated Denver daily (weekday and weekend) totals appear in TABLE le: Candlewood Trip Generation Per Occupied Rooni (Omaha - IDaily), on the following page. Applying the measured weekday rate to a standard 122-unit Candlewood Hotel, the total number of trip-ends estimated at complete occupancy is 480 trips per day, as shown in TABLE 3e: Trip Generation Rates Compared - Numerical Differences Assuming All Units Occupied. The ITE weekday rate for a similar facility will be 887 trips, 407 trips more Ithan the Candlewood data will support. -- Data compiled in TABLE 2h: Percent Difference of Peak Rates, indicate that weekday peak hour rates for the Denver Candlewooci site ranged from 7.7 percent less than the HE weekday peak hour rate, to 25.0 percent less than the ITE rate. TABLE lh: Candlewood Trip Generation Per Occupied Room (Denver- Peak), summarizes the weekday and weekend trip end data for AM Peak hours (7:00 a.m. - 9:00 p.m.) and for PM Peak Hours (4:00 p.m-6:00 p.m.). Tabulated data in TABLE 311: Trip Generation Compared - Numerical Differences Assuming All Units Occupied, show that weekday peak hour trip generation rates applied to a standard 122-unit Candlewood Hotel will produce a typical weekday morning total of 63 trip ends per hour. This compares to a total of 68 trip ends per hour for the ITE peak weekday morning rate of 0.56 trip ends per occupied room. Afternoon peak hour rates for the same Candlewood hotel, based on the measured data, will be expected to produce 52 trip ends for the normal weekday. rib data indicate a total of 70 trip ends for a weekday afternoon peak hour for a 122-unit hotel. In all three cases -weekday morning peak hour, weekday afternoon peak hour and weekday daily total volume-the collected Candlewood data indicated trip generation rates lower than that shown in the ITE Trip Generation publication. I I I I 12 I .- .......r ,ass .msoinr uemmon « :ate .Rims= I_ .J . .immi dommW .1mmo Jo =PM Mmi MEM i MIEN . TABLE le: Candlewood Trip Generation Per Occupied Room (Denver- Daily) AM PM • Daily Day Trip Trip Trip Occupied AM Avg PM Avg Daily Avg Date of Week Ends Ends Ends Rooms Rate Rate Rate June 20 Friday 145 239 384 91 1.59 2.63 4.22 June 21 Saturday 90 195 285 72 1.25 2.71 3.96 • June 22 Sunday 84 211 295 107 0.79 .1.97 2.76 June 23 Monday 111 350 461 122 0.91 2.87 3.78 June 24 Tuesday 131 328 459 131 1.00 2.50 3.50 June 25 Wednesday 116 360 476 126 0.92 2.86 3.78 _ ;. June 19 Thursday 160 348 508 116 1.38 3.00 4.38 TABLE 2e Percent Difference of Daily Rates ITE Daily Candlewood Daily Percent Difference 7.27 3.93 -45.92% TABLE 3e: Trip Generation Rates Compared Numerical Differences Assuming All Units Occupied No. Hotel Candlewood ITE Numerical Units Daily Daily Difference 80 315.00 582.00 267.00 98 385.00 712,00 327.00 110 433.00 800.00 367.00 122 480.00 887.00 407.00 134 527.00 974,00 447.00 150 590.00 1091.00 501.00 YOMOM1111 lirs -- o TABLE 1 h: Candlewood Trip Generation Per Occupied Room (Denver - Peak Hour) AM Peak PM Peak No. Day Trip Trip Occupied AM Peak PM Peak Date of Week Ends Ends Rooms Rate Rate . " June 20 Friday 45 37 91 0.49 0.41 _ June 21 Saturday 20 33 72 0.28 0.46 June 22 Sunday 28 20 107 0.26 0.19 June 23 Monday 62 49 122 0.51 0.40 June 24 Tuesday 66 52 131 0.50 0.40 • June 25 Wednesday 70 52 131 0,53 0.40 • June 19 Thursday 63 62 116 0.54 0.53 TABLE 2h: Percent Difference of Peak Rates ITE AM Peak Candlewood AM Peak Percent Difference 0.56 0.52 -7.72% ITE PM Peak Candlewood PM Peak Percent Difference 0.57 0.43 25.03% TABLE 3h: Trip Generation Compared - Numerical Differences Assuming All Units Occupied No. Hotel Candlewood Trip Data ITE Trip Data Numerica[Differences Units AM Peak PM Peak AM Peak PM Peak . AM'Peak PM Peak 80 41.00 34.00 45.00 46.00 4.00 11.00 98 51.00 42.00 55.00 56.00 ' 4.00 13.00 110 57.00 47.00 62.00 63.00 5.00 15.00 122 63.00 52.00 68.00 70.00 • 5.00 16.00 134 69.00 57.00 75.00 76.00 6.00 18.00 150 78.00 64.00 84.00 86.00 ' 6.00 20.00 • Denver: AM Weekday Peak Hour Trip Generation Per Occupied Room 80 — r r r `1) 70 C ' . I Q X I v I 60 ' J L J L L L • Q) U a) 50 L L 1 • CT 40 r r r r (1) 30 — t r r r I I 20 I 1 l , 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 X = Number of Occupied Rooms Fitted Power Curve T=a*x^b • Denver: PV Weekday Peak Hour Trip Generation Per Occupied Room 70 r r r r 1 V/ X C 60 — Q L F- X a_ 5 0 _ L 1 I v •- I W I n` I 1 1 1 I I a-) 40 L • L L 1 -) �l� 1 1 0 x /IL I •1 I I > Q1 I I I II 30 J J L 1 1 • 1 F 1 - I 20 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 X = Number of Occupied Rooms Fitted Power Curve T=a*x^b �� .rile; ' 270 Lund Road�a��ica�'c, Inc. (360) 533-2007 _i • ` =, Cosmopolis, WA 98537 FAX: (360) 533-1618 Olfi{ - INTERNET: http://www.techline.com/—earthcic January 20, 1998 Earthcalc Job#6925 Ali Sadr Barghausen Engineers 18215 72nd Avenue South Kent, WA 98032 RE: Candelwood Hotel BE job# 6882 Dear Ali, Enclosed please find grid elevation cut/fill graphics and volumes for this project, which was calculated using the average end area method with a cross-section created approximately every .61' and the following assumptions. 1. A stripping depth of 6" was applied to the existing terrain. 2. A depth 6" from design elevations to subgrade in the paving. 3. A depth-of 8" from-Finish-Floor elevations to-subgrade in-the buildings. 4. A depth of 0" from design elevations to subgrade in the landscaping. 5. The existing flood storage capacity was calculated to be 2977CY at elev 16.58 for the entire site and the design storage capacity of the new flood storage ponds is 3778CY to elev 16.58,. TOTAL RAW VOLUMES IN PLACE Region Area (ft2 Cut Fill Stripping (in Cubic Yards) Total 122,420 2,734 11,560 2,257 * Raw volumes have not been adjusted to reflect shrink or swell for compaction and expansion and are volumetric areas only. SITEWORK REPORT JOB NAME : FAR COMPANY DESIGN BUILDER : BARGHAUSfN ENGINEERS OPERATOR : EARTHCALC (360) 533-2007 DATE : 01/20/1999 PRINTED : 01/20/1999 01:57:16 PM - VOLUMES REPORT JOB NAME : 450.EAS FAR COMPANY DESIGN PF : 01/20/1999 01:57:00 PM STRIPPING REGION DEPTH AREA VOLUME STRIP 0.50 121868 2257 VOLUMES. CY AREA. SF (AFTER STRIPPING) REGION LAYER MATERIAL SECT TOTAL CUT FILL CUT FILL BLDG NAT'L GROUND SUITABLE 0.67 17111 0 17111 0 2451 DETENTION POND NAT'L GROUND SUITABLE 0.00 12470 11141 1329 1847 55 LDS 01 NAT'L GROUND SUITABLE 0.00 2824 34 2790 0 262 LDS 02 NAT'L GROUND SUITABLE 0.00 13676 27 13649 0 1874 LDS 03 NAT'L GROUND SUITABLE 0.00 3566 17 3549 0 325 SUB TOTAL: NAT'L GROUND SUITABLE 20066 78 19988 0 2461 PRKG NAT'L GROUND SUITABLE 0.50 56472 362 56110 8 6432 WETLAND NAT'L CROUND SUITABLE 0.00 16301 12189 4112 879 161 JOB TOTAL NAT'L GROUND SUITABLE 122420 23770 98650 2734 11560 SITE AREA: 129499 UNSPECIFIED: 7079 - These volumes were calculated using the AVERAGE END AREA method. 3461 cross sections were computed at an average separation of 0.34 feet. BALANCE REPORT JOB NAME : 450.EAS FAR COMPANY DESIGN PRINTED : 01/20/1999 01:57:00 PM VOLUMES, CY BALANCE (AFTER STRIPPING) COMPACTION VOLUMES CY EXPORT (IMPORT) CHANGE REGION LAYER MATERIAL CUT FILL CUT FILL CUT FILL UNSUIT SUIT PER .1 FT BLDG NAT'L GROUND SUITABLE 0 2451 1.00 1.23 0 3015 0 (3015) 78 DETENTION POND NAT'L GROUND SUITABLE 1847 55 1.00 1.00 1847 55 0 1792 46 LDS 01 NAT'L GROUND SUITABLE 0 262 1.00 1.17 0 307 0 (307) 12 LDS 02 NAT'L GROUND SUITABLE 0 1874 1.00 1.17 0 2193 0 (2193) 59 LDS 03 NAT'L GROUND SUITABLE 0 325 1.00 1.17 0 380 0 (380) 15 SUB TOTAL: NAT'L GROUND SUITABLE 0 2461 0 2880 0 (2880) PRKG NAT'L GROUND SUITABLE 8 6432 1.00 1.23 8 7911 0 (7903) 257 WETLAND NAT'L GROUND SUITABLE 879 161 1.00 1.00 879 161 0 718 60 JOB TOTAL 2734 11560 2734 14022 0 (11288) 527 4. , 4,QI I Ps f 1 1 /..r:1,/,$•.. f . 5.. 11 , ,► ++ 1 •rj1 , r . : - y .4i0,...•,Qr' .1 f it , t, f :',4 !•,, 'lib:l '' 1 A li thr ��•,•• , .r,1?g, :',41.," � I,Ir + I1Ky,f ,• la.,..,.,, ,,,41•,,!1.,6 + ,► 1 i 6. ,� ; . 4: 16rrr.. w 1 P ..,f,. ,etite. . • , t .1 + ;,'; 1 it 1. v ,. . 1"S'• i• 1' XX r ,r�p,,,�,' ' ,. 1• 111 1 ' ,,, i'Ti '.' ., .,'r',p44;,','4 : 41', 4. . t )t r� iJ� p �, • AA((► , r t y '',./s, :., 0'fr',1, .qt:siit:t le f . ,, A r r.;1..:-.4.t,, ,0',," . ..pro 1 , I•, �► ,1�' k )(.$ }fir; • . $s $% ? l" ( i' A ';;-l',;��';��il1 II..�CL,! '�jSt,'['rCf � ► � V}► `�'�y43 � X��rY�,x�C't`tr(�{}f�'t.��(`�ei ir S,('' ie rd'?' ,y11 1 / { F �( �`•rY( ,4;.(,' j:\t",,,,•�'''�s% `�'l`t • :.�rY jrf; plt Kh 1,,} ��.' 4► 1 ► 1 ► �r i kk,k X ' '• ;'" , , 4 1?► • lit , x j -) x,,.; r c1 i'i,• <`0 1 1p . 41e r ► (` Y l > : kt l � ;�..( rr qr': 1"fir �is m oi, , ► i —•..-( ��" ''''• tip C t,. 0 .,T. lh 1 . 1 1 t fit' 1r 'r�•k C•Yr �:. x�ii,,,.'44 #0 0 4 1.-.6 krc,s-,. '(-vc (c ', .;' ',e-,:x",",,- ; § ! F k 11j k`N't tkh th �i yak;,•.• V Rorx �1\rt's'4 ► ,kk 66 s kt•1kki ,. 1 , I ''' (.100 PN) '' ' *'•rr elliiii A ONO, 0+:40•••;•:',4 al Air ,14 {r 4 :bye •`'V+�''.°`ir`�°,'.4•ai,4,�' ,'♦ ''+'.��.}'rr�0�f'Ii}i {J ih'•'.•�. H9011+I►I"1��f��! , 0 I ,1/111► 'f•.. �f�r: p:,,4� ,s'i,!fyy�'skys4►f'petie ►,y,N11 ,.�• fro ec''i,;1,.�,y."�,rt� " Z, `is t'wee eL""�►"+1 7+�.1 f 1 + ie;,jl /;+ty,'t�yA,�i1,41;'+iV44 ,eS"""♦"lile{fi'ri1♦ ��+ If A'• ! " 1'154� .1 4 f�t'"1"1"+�''1"f'1"!1'���" IIf1/11111♦1•1�1, ,'VI, ti's`1 4414 ,`\S►+`,�''+'+ ,1+'1, "♦♦/•1♦/1111+�i1/1 +,: r:. , he '%+""e1•"r ►e"Fife+tt,..,e, . ►N 11111♦ ♦♦1 t r¢ .4 y4.40.ii"r5 , ,0 •f %,w t f1i"."r�1 H♦ �'f� �t,�.r r�r',s�rs M •• s`fe1i•il"►" ''1'11y",�.•�}f►1111►1/1/11♦♦ '070.4Y{tlilt4+f ..r4''"+/',i",t1•ftit.,es...,..�If•♦1/►"•%:,10♦►1111♦1111►1�1111fA-. {,,.. SS `,,,, `}�,,,v'•15'•,% kff�elR1•"/ "4/1*1111/S. - �r�yr, si `�,I.,44 ,•"• P"'•P' i44,;► J�{r1.1.111i1iIJ/111 At ' t y��`� � . z�`�1�.�,�,•'•i•9iL`�''+"•iS•`t••,•f►,+,+i'�r••♦ 1�91�♦•►''1/11111111 Iv \i,;,,,4' .' +s►'6t44,ttS`•+,,p,#.0.444,i�i.494,6+/1i1►11//111/►11•//11//t 4 t ��S3{4i 020 ','.i•SKr'if;+fi'r'0'•`•••►i'•�►•+,♦►i"•►i•1 1+♦1/1114449'1/11♦j r 1 \ ��$F���, l!��1S { 4�'ibY'+;+'�•�i.5",,,r,•1••1 •••",{ ••� ►►�1♦ N1 1►+,f 11 "�+W+ lY.�{N'a��•',@pp,�y,tr•+�♦. "•+•► •1i+," •►+ff♦/ +111►+11.►♦1♦1►111`►,1�1f t ,►S` 00, 4S4ti +•�e,/,•►t, 1 f�"'!��j}111•♦♦1►11�11►111�j11♦�1� +t i 4 %;*•}144:44 ' �y4etq+,►0,•+,+ titre4♦i.•►♦j1�111i11♦1+�♦1♦♦:fr. lir ' � r�:• ',•L, •4t•+•i tail •"•:0414/,1f01e 4444`► '44♦1+ 1♦1/11 i1♦♦1 Q l+U • ii'yi4::::$1Z-;:yi!►'•�►' ►i', "1R,4 4: 4.• 111►11��4•4 j11/11♦♦♦1♦ ! ,+J�rSv��+i'' "„'�a�,6►1,►,Ri4o+►1;! �..,,��,►+1111 •�IIIIII+1►♦�i�1 ,�'�,,J�rfay�0{d+�;;.,•'JZ.y�T�'tR','�r�,�►r•,•t'••►�,tt►`,.;¢f�•I�+f+'►�"t+•+♦If f+1►►�/1♦,f1i1♦►♦i♦♦1♦'', -�.*LA�� 1 1$09,i'r't!Ai�►40, 4s♦"•�,��L•t.$ n1►I 1+, 1f�►►1►1►♦♦/♦1�►/1f►1��♦♦♦♦�♦♦j♦*♦v♦,► + /Ao r'� t�0••n'�t�4y4"J,4,`l� 4,+111s 4+►sr.4►►►114404.00.4140444.1♦ 4 ♦ f0 ,R' +�Y'� '`'' � �i"l.♦+•• •►��.f++1►/ ♦ ♦♦♦ '.la.•p,,, 't4'0414►Q+ •1 ►.1 1►►1♦•♦♦ 1►1♦ ♦ ♦ ♦0'$$$$• . ,r ,,d +a',`i'Pff{��►•+P♦i,1► ► f o f,f1►►, 1 } ♦' '♦ / ♦�' • ♦ �wi♦{ �p t;�t '�+;'`•Sy de+►P•►,P��•tti�+��fQfii►►i1Q1+"►1��►♦♦♦♦��1�►♦�♦`♦♦♦�♦�♦�,♦♦�♦♦♦-'1♦♦i: a1. ,, , ,4p 1'l�+►►i�0•I►►►�d v►4v�c�iQ•♦511►1�♦`♦♦♦V♦♦1♦♦♦��.r♦ � � ♦ �c' ;►��+A�r✓3;�';P'•iw++'►•l4►♦f�+v�♦� P�►1�♦►�1+1 AO*41:::::sti$:$t♦ ♦ ♦♦♦ ,♦♦♦♦♦�♦♦♦ �♦�'♦��'�,f,zb+,o-,Jtd��;"r+ v►yQ++v�►►'►►v0►►1 d►� ♦♦� �♦♦♦�♦♦♦*♦�t, �,,�,�t�� ',ttet f,•S► ,t�r►♦1,i'♦1h •ff,t�►► ♦1`.� ��♦,, ..'sat, ' l'► ►vt♦E++♦►►++.►�►►OOJ '♦ ♦ �♦♦♦ ♦♦♦♦ ♦♦♦v ,"P,4+j+ ,,, ,41,,,►,►.I►►+1 t t►►,,s,,„1 ►♦♦�♦♦♦♦♦♦ 4,IA 0I.4 ♦ ♦ ad,�; a'>~+'4't01% 1+�i�r',tf i+%`'`:4.PA•►04$L+►�►►►�c�.1.�1,♦►t �/♦1♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦�A♦♦ it.O A ,tt to a , '4,sp t31t11 4 0,10,v ♦ '�♦♦♦i♦♦♦ ♦1,♦♦i ,in A4 ,, i 1 �,,=�1� 1{f'♦�►�►�,R".�♦♦►♦� ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦�♦♦♦�♦�s �'°"'``t '+`'' o b�;t•►r►►p t►�t�11',.♦11Q11j4''10:♦♦♦♦ ♦♦♦♦,�♦♦♦♦♦•1\ t �.a�1,',•ltl1, •�L�',a,+so s .;i':-a'►►►�►It�1�.!►.���♦!1♦♦i♦♦♦�� ♦ ♦ �i 1$, �� 01+�•t'►P�1�►1'A+1►►►@► 1.0i►♦♦, t♦♦ ♦♦♦♦ ►♦♦♦♦♦ ,�t, ,1$0�t D;1$ �,,,,,1 1, ►{t►►►t�j 1♦►1►♦♦►�►�1�♦♦♦♦♦♦�♦♦♦♦�♦ 1 :0 t 3'4,v,,,►��N pia`�'►,t`i�rl•+'��1►�►►``�1t1►♦�►11♦`41♦�1♦♦\+♦♦� ��♦*♦ z 1 ''�'`ti ' i '40 t ► ►►►► �`11 ♦1Q t 1♦ �♦♦♦�♦♦1♦0 * cp . v,04,4\?,ii. 0 0.1 t;,go,g1 ViliAiiilk'As tgo$1$40$0'Aztol ,-„-, ,'i'►%or L stk .''♦tAlty rtA�'ujy�►�fs*1♦ tit "149,It ' n eyr 401+11 _,,h,v4/oho%tit Slifi'fr:tap 0 i(4 hoq 4.... ,400,4, f ,--,\.,,,off,,,,b.:,x1.4447, Attoyliii) 04 5 1 ���' 14� 7e �i.' • oftio r.c f, `v{ �yy \:'skitiot.ss astyr/, ,„b iii* 4 \I•t4 SW Vs .0PAV•i)?".''tk 'Ytii.V 4' 910. tki \tt S•Iii fes 1‘‘,‘ s f,,,. t\ i ,, ,A, 4o41,,* + 1 K,„\A ,ail 1 0 4r04*. ,,V,%4*.Ooih t,.,0 ,\,,,\,, , v\v V v.4 pV. .40 A. • 4\::,,,A.,.....\-40 c ‘ 100.4 ots:4,,,\freiselictpoit\i,04 A,\4 too 4%%4* .,,,011,\vitttst\to,„, 1, ,,,,, ,,,,y. 4.4t *,,...„ to\ • so•0 % to,...r,• .•.Ni. 1*4 *il lili\i40010$0*A 4 * 14$ 4* 04040,4 ilid**4 St 04.104 '11:041* 1 \4404%$114 SVV4P44V \VVAltik + O � rr� r $104SS,004 ' yV � � O� :rr � e4 4: 444 "* , W► ir 4 ♦oovotofttip• lit.444 0 0 4.1,y,,,ses •se,s 00•00•0•#.44\4.0...*44 /ob./ -- . , it,, 40,410:410.44. ,x 1'stii1A' `'� 4 +4V li; 1,�,+E �• 'b�•Qt♦iW'r04♦�1 �.t. .♦44.04�*ai‘t\/ *' ►�,► ti� � \ rtitt►$r►t►t4rt .444 ,,,444O�sss"• 41Tii..t0 r ' t \ d►4!0r4► t4�4R'`44 44 r4o / k , +4+' ' �. t40,40t44t444�•4t4444 0TA 4 ►+ l�rr 0,0i fttr4�4t 3`\\� 1.41:;•;" -- ,411sollk -,,:-.;;:::•:11tr-e4*• --. .... -,,,..-..,,....,,,,.,„:,,,,,,,,.,,,,,,...,, ?.c.V."2:5.'\ ,1/4'`'-'.C.''.:,-;`,... . -.':,=:`.1-`'''''-':-;'-.01* _.-...'.1.7, F,'"'::‘,.e"<':'.':"4!' \-ti y l max ; ;;ti., Y,ti ^> '•5.,, 'r l . '- - ' N'� ,� ,'r 1' � ..•7' •--;,\.c�i�;;:�� \•i.� 1. `c'..?c" �` , ' �\; .1 x' �'�N. te:\;\' \ '•�t- . t;%'<..' �4, �. y• � % •� . \C' \tfiy, .<;•';'r.K;`�l•; ,,.: . I•� . , � s • • I/ Imo.. v `,:'\;; _ ...III 'iS '�':'.. „:...P. 4 •IP Jc ?:FAR COMPANY DESIGN • t.1 x:' •ri " X r,, ♦� 1, r .' :.+ginn ,rJ^�.,, t`,'•^'X� ,. \V•I0I.\rii'i!` �W r rr,,,,,,, }rSn:}}i•r,r�. y1;,,^„S, 11" I �Vi�: vt!y)v i�'y'''r�••1 .✓'iv'v ♦ `�, 1� i�iEr ,'Yv,'X:= r�i,;r,�r x♦agi r;y(^✓ .:,^ , n4 ��;♦ e ♦,t..:i!,/tv :,t7� .Zi pz r„ v`.....is. ;a,„i :2tj%!,SS.+�f•` %"r1.]11�1��%i "Jj: Sl'; .'i ,),1,^/•�J;X.. i •�����:�Ii. :,'i';.Lk%z'fJl�.riri`''� "� Yy✓. yhJ.J'.Ol.!i,. �1• f` '. '^�1. ':!l',. nr / 1..;(; }�.,.: ....•�.`• �j �i7h41 r.T%L,lx.i•,:;:{i:... Y%,•!,,: , ;`rY ',r•;" :•/ 't j1I�� 5V •'X,S J,.y',i x a ( r�.J✓��. 'r�,'' ';/t ,c , T,5 r4 �t'i`S`�X,:iTt r r r✓J, _i 1 i >"C c04F 9Yp ri;{{}`fir J' r ^,{Y' 1/ ..e/(';•'', '. `\A rn,)2"4Xza'fi 47". ,r X) rc,.r t y /t r t!';^.+• '{J., A. <-,"cp,S',yS�'^.�:^,y' :!";1'','_ ( t i t ", .t,,<t i t \ A%k^V,f 1<n T.✓`"11}t i!r z ,t•/ l ,r i''•f y.W..5iya=z•,ir ,7.},,, ,;' ;pit ' :t1/:'t/•').�•`' Y'.,,C;,`a `t riti) ^rf`. S�1� ?i /rr5 ':':k',i '> ,\>`/,t'. ,;'-ritr :;,a ✓14.,•y W%f{:','`i( f ',.r{;'-r'i r't'• f l,.. '',.•,. ',_.;! ,,lxJ d i'ytt ill f,✓;(6�.,ri J . `'''ti.`, .z'r'4 t'''Y..,'.\t.':",%.'X.1. '' ',,.s ) t ,z',wMl �5j1?' t'..,.e�1'S‘iye!i '.. / .:,/1'ttn;%:'f'.y. `.rt ``v'µ?t a^t l i^%i1ri�i''(S r ' .y',:: .y';•', t XN.• ',,V aft/ S,f'S y)J{y,1 �\ .e:,e.,.:\,y; r✓ ,:'.J i,'/.:• ,J i,;,',,`.i C" ,.<} Y?•/, ,/t�/ •• .`•,:'•;..:,,. t /, ;" ✓i ;;k, 1.N y r r,i Tr cc 1 2 V ze tl \ 1 15 II !! . ee 1611 24t ue . 2 422.8 - 116.9 IIII 16 se _ -. ...Mirigra. 'AM Thli""nr, M -..."..MW I 4...._41111110111111.11°M11111111111MNIIIIIrly . . I:7., it ar144147 ftk 14 30 a ."•••-_........ .,eow:11.F-1.-- .'‘,--6111111 =fpril 1,va---. mini PPP ' i 1•4y'-" • ill- .•'-- liT1.** 13 21' - ''', -i Eg 12 te /- ', P -larit,0111trigaiH '''.'''-7-44t.E:-,.. ‘) flit.W.•;";;;M;V:MigT,APMOV-;•""ArMitlia e, .1.; •..,..m.,,,,, ,_-it- ' /' ir .0.0,./se:stgesti-Nrnsace,;;401,0 0-40:"•-.007/ ,4 , ,.0., . ipp ;_:•;..., ., . . ' , A y,; .„Kw.,:w.orz.ri,=HI... - ---- -, - 1.., 7...4... ....t.,-.1, .. , , , 40,,,.,,,,....,..t. ..,,•44,-.1,4,...,0 4.**,,ITE,,,, . -....„, \ a ,,i0;•...,;;. --, , 0ia:i . votpstf it,,,,,;=::: 0•07,,h, 'ii r i z "X'r,;.1:4 •,•••rs, i.....ws Ai ..,A,... ...... 1 '-", - 1 .1.11 E mit r;.'.-45,1:- . \ i/, • -.AW,T,;*c";,,i4 Ist.,s,'''''.§;s0;,:t.n?Sa,....,0aili›. ':Fi,i,%;;;,., 0,..„„, •;;;;„...0•;;' / ''',r-S:t;.M 4''''Ki4t1W-fsffi-P•00-Vtifele: ;;;;;',;ir ' • " iEFE.ii.imin ,,,,., kP'nr 1,-,) ''' ' j" ------';‘,04-4;":t41 044.144:ttsWtistir~*c;" :...:0'T'':,.. =' , ',,' ^T l'unzz::::: NiT,' 0. 7 70 ,,If,:14'ir / / • " ...4F Gii.04 ybkc„,•24.4tfaitati:Astozsws_.2,iii:11: : ..-...r.rz- ------ :....r. ..„.' l'e.. / , --1- ji'-:tifIglill •ftlriftwi-viiamti -7- •rov:iiiii iiir... - t. ' I I . tis77 74 TV",,!0.-'' t1.0,1 IN. '. 11.0, 5 50 :.mirk... ...4,:co. : ,„..„,...,,,;,4 , ,, , ...:0 ...W :!,::::...: :.!.. ..;. AlifnjAft"lillilii11111)Ai-4M• •'" ' iltol, ..,,,e,,,: .:litt.. ......_t .,_..7.,.. itir'''•:. ' % .,._.) I- 1- ''----- ...-.,=..--"'"`,„,:7,,,t% , - \ 3 30 / 4 rgisa—m---- i i / / 1 ii_..--,0 • " 11.,M.r.s1 i ”...--"'" •-,-- i '''',;,, 0 .--iirr r,i,,r , r,„.„...,,,,,,„: ,,..,, i, ,, ,,,,,,,....... ...,.:,,:;„,,,,„,,,,„,,,..,,,,„,,_.,.''"- ' iri!awnewsureH316.34:11,,s.4. 11):::..,041;.,7-11:14'rjr7,0,514z,;-;:::ii1.114;57;17:117:' : 7 _ lh, Ritc.„. 4-- ,.,_. , fp., 2 20 _ t 41 1111ey,-„,:ss‘.- 't.lt.„.'..svaa' -• z,,I.sx.. • regnitg2,;;;;;;:?il• 'i \ ,.,/- 1 / ' momak gp .4. ) &'-':, 5 5'3 , 1_ ,,,,,„ .. „...1 __,„. _, ='; - ---,__ '''-- '"'"7_ _ 'l__ ; -iy _ ..._ _ \ , _- 411 r--; 6 60 --_,....._____ - - - - ---------r- ------- FT:1, 7 70 f.5..,,.. e se + tst"F,Ert- 9 90 i6.a _. WWi*‘ 6X.Aitt.'VslikkOttetiii ---1 80 160 1 i ea e M12 10 13.28 is ee 15 413 16 se A-(-23,328.4) B=(-23.-50.8) C--(422.6.-50.8) Job Name.FAR COMPANY DESIGN SITEWORK REPORT JOB NAME : FAR COMPANY DES-STORG BUILDER : BARGHAUSEN ENGINEERS OPERATOR : EARTHCALC (360) 533-2007 DATE : 01/20/1999 PRINTED : 01/20/1999 02:03:54 PM ice_ .\ "�� �\I II /t\ .i / 111 7.05 / A `— _ l �--t — x / \I / r 6.50 f - neean +Nw.+xw.w..Ft+ax..vaaeeaccx '—... s, �lontalc 1 �. iri:::,m. ,....1. ...,,, ..,,l'I..,..,..... .t.p. `i✓ty u 'k+�-�+TItA' '+ jam� / ,� CCC ; :-.7P!'tiill15:;°''''.:'-i.'. "h'''' Y .."i. .iv "y '+SY.tidj t rfsl I 1.:.i:.ih.4)::ir:5..v77.7-4r--43:17...4t):779.0:76,zrzttiti:......-11,4471.:4,1a,..0.7,47,714:::w4.4,1e,.g.:*7-17:taLlfli.,:7,.' ,,,,,v„,...,.7.:.4frey7;i,:izt".:71111121g::::::...:i::,::::1...::.:".1:;.;.17(:; it 4.23 G z E Mt3 Sy u Y'tfr/:::A. - s '+''' 3.76 V. R I z� a t4.. x I 4' f 7 '"V erar,„..fF + 'x'x'{.F...,FF .... 1.B8 witepii we 1.41 t r, Y+7. rah r 3 ' i I -'- — dt r'FT in';.'. 4" 58. 7 ; 2.82 st arr< asys.. u,:x. 3.29 Of .23 -++b 'Sri..,,, / 4.. s .t `{\ r .f kr.3 i LR.�7i.''g,44.Y IS. #. -, y '.t'.. ss' 1+q 4"N.tq : • IIIII x n.#...-y awry S7.ZwZ'm. ` nmr.? 0avFS�"Jlf 40 00 I=(-16.6.307.9) *(-'' c,-22.5) C=(177.-22.5) 4ob ;FAR COMPANY DES-STORG VOLUMES REPORT FOR NAME : 449.EAS FAR COMPANY TO 16.58 PF : 01/20/1999 01:05:08 PM (NO STRIPPING REGIONS SPECIFIED) x l S\ l N C5 VOLUMES, CY AREA, SF (AFTER STRIPPING) REGION LAYER MATERIAL SECT TOTAL CUT FILL CUT FILL 16.58 NAT'L GROUND SUITABLE 0.00 125673 53408 72265 1910 2977 JOB TOTAL NAT'L GROUND SUITABLE 125673 53408 72265 1910 2977 SITE AREA: 134168 UNSPECIFIED: 8495 These volumes were calculated using the AVERAGE END AREA method. 880 cross sections were computed at an average separation of 0.36 feet. VOLUMES REPORT JO1 : 451.EAS FAR COMPANY DES-STORG PR : 01/20/1999 02:59:36 PM (NO STRIPPING REGIONS SPECIFIED) T (��! �/ VOLUMES. CY AREA, SF (AFTER STRIPPING) REGION LAYER MATERIAL SECT TOTAL CUT FILL CUT FILL CAPACITY DESIGN NAT'L GROUND SUITABLE 0.00 29024 2445 26579 95 3778 JOB TOTAL NAT'L GROUND SUITABLE 29024 2445 26579 95 3778 SITE AREA: 129499 UNSPECIFIED: 100475 These volumes were calculated using the AVERAGE END AREA method. 432 cross sections were computed at an average separation of 0.68 feet. �4ss SOILS Map Unit Name 5ti l///�a ,✓ �Drainage Class G/(/ (Series &Phase) Field observations confirm AID No Taxonomy (subgroup) mapped type? Profile Description Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors Mottle abundance Texture,concretions, Drawing of soil (inches) (Munsell (Munsell size&contrast structure,etc. profile moist) moist) (match description) s A tyre 313 5: 5 9 46 'irk yt/3 . 4)—1 g &fie f(3 -5-4 e--/ J /, ,zq Q� , sY.512 /nfd ,2 d_ gY��b nt/d ps Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) Histosol Concretions Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils _ Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List Gleyed or Low•-Chroma C lors Other(explain in remarks) Hydric soils present? yes no j Rationale for decision/Remarks: 1 !r4; c.e4 —5 Wetland Determination(circle) • Hydrophytic vegetation present? no Hydric soils present? yes eg Is the sampling point yes —� Wetland hydrology present? yes /i�� within a wetland? Rationale/Remarks: v • NOTES: • DATA FORM 1 Routine Wetland Determination (WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or 1987 Corps Wetland Delineation Manual) Project/Site: u /c ret 4211,v 10-�/ Date: / /� .94 U p , ( Applicanuowner: de S 5 //O l I c ,✓cj C o , County: J-Ng - J State: 4J4 Investigator(s): ed.. it $ A la STTIR: /l,23,V /�/ Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? (yc) no Community 1D j r Is the site significantly disturbed(atypical situation)? no Transect ID: / a y Is the area a potential Problem Area? yes () Plot ID: VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum .. Indicator Co ffAa wcD_o A 5 4 Mad feed4lIer- 516 Ilwitt-c--/ �/ u/ HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: %of dominants OBL,FACW,&FAC: /D 0 Check all indicators that apply&explain below: Regional knowledge of plant communities Wetland plant list(nat'l or regional) "------ OTHER Physiological or reproductive adaptations Morphological adaptations Technical Literature Wetland Plant Data Base Hydrophytic vegetation present? no • Rationale for decision/Remarks: HYDROLOGY Is it the growing season? yes no yes Water Marks: yes no Sediment Deposits: yes no Based on: Uk L Drift Lines: yes no Drainage Patterns: yes no Dept. of inundation: inches Oxidized Root(live roots) Local Soil Survey: yes no Channels<12 in. yes no Depth to free water in pit: inches FAC Neutral: yes no Water-stained 4Leaves: yes no Depth to saturated soil: 3 2 Y inches Check all that apply&explain below: Other. Stream, Lake or gage data: Aerial photographs: Other: Wetland hydrology present? yes no Rationale for decision/Remarks: 4 SOILS / , MapUnit Name .d 'l 4�"� 1 / $eiJ/ Drainage Class Apo r (Series & Phase) J , Field observations confirm diti No Taxonomy (subgroup) mapped type? I Profile Description Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors Mottle abundance Texture, concretions, Drawing of soil (inches) (Munsell (Munsell size&contrast structure, etc. profile moist) moist) (match description) G, 25 6 2,5—wi Q• sio ts-4,A i A 5, -4 25'- 51 C, 5�Y'611 M dS 1 r_sL_ -- Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) Histosol Concretions _ Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils Sulfidic Odor J)roganic Streaking in Sandy Soils Aquic Moisture Regime "Listed on Local Hydric Soils List Reducing Conditions - Listed on National Hydric Soils List Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other(explain in remarks) 0. Hydric soils present? no Rationale for decision/Remar . Wetland Determination (circle) . Hydrophytic vegetation present? es no Hydric soils present? no Is the sampling point yes Wetland hydrology present? yes ro within a wetland? Rationale/Remarks: v • • NOTES: S DATA FORM 1 i Routine Wetland Determination (WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or 1987 Corps Wetland Delineation Manual Project/Site: w /6 tit (0 a Jo-a/ Date: / / l?a I , ` C� Applicant/owner: deS S /1 p l d t ,.., o , County: /�- J C tN_/ ' State: 4/4 Investigator(s): ed., Pt $ A sr Q SJTJR: / .23 /t/g Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? (y S no Community) " Is the site significantly disturbed(atypical situation)? () no Transect ID: / Is the area a potential Problem Area? yes � Plot ID: VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator _ Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator ee, L 4 ii c14 QL HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: %of dominants OBL,FACW, &FAC: 66 v Check all indicators that apply &explain below: Regional knowledge of plant communities Wetland plant list(nat'I or regional) ✓ OTHER Physiological or reproductive adaptations Morphological adaptations Technical Literature Wetland Plant Data Base Hydrophytic vegetation present? rio Rationale for decision/Remarks: HYDROLOGY • Is it the growing season? yes 6::* Water Marks: yes no Sediment Deposits: yes no Based on: d,f e. Drift Lines: yes no Drainage Patterns: yes no Dept. of inundation: inches Oxidized Root(live roots) Local Soil Survey: yes no Channels <12 in. yes no Depth to free water in pit: inches FAC Neutral: yes no Water-stained Leaves: yes no Depth to saturated soil: '7 241 inches Check all that apply &explain below: Other. Stream, Lake or gage data: • Aerial photographs: Other: Wetland hydrology present? yes no Rationale for decision/Remarks: t /1/es SOILS MapUnit Name Cejh�v // Z' / �� Drainage Class /?o Gt.eG� A:=4"/ (Series & Phase) Field observations confirm s No Taxonomy (subgroup) mapped type? Profile Description Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors Mottle abundance Texture, concretions, Drawing of soil (inches) (Munsell (Munsell size &contrast structure, etc. profile moist) moist) (match description) b 6 1-07k373 S,- 4 -,zS � '5 /i /)' 5Ye3-4. Al ( j S� SV /f ?, s pRs/t 3 L sL Hydric Sail Indicators: (check all that apply) Histosol Concretions Histic _ EpipedonHigh Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils _ Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils _ Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List _ Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other(explain in remarks) Hydric soils present? e�` //irio� � 1 �r Rationale for decision/Remarks: �' �5, y . Wetlani Determination (circle) Hydroph ytic vegetation present? AO no Hydric sails present? • X no Is the sampling point yes Z Wetland hydrology present? yes no within a wetland? Rationale/Remarks: NOTES: DATA FORM 1 , Routine Wetland Determination , (WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or 1987 Corps Wetland Delineation Manual) Project/Site: 5 /6 elf (Pia A./o„/ Date: / /7 l 9 8 , Applicant/owner: /t/e i 5 /f 0 l d i ,✓1 C o County: /i- - State: 4./4 Investigator(s): e C 1 $ ,4 SO. S/T/R: 2 Y tD 2 3 /I/ Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? (yet) no Community Is the site significantly disturbed(atypical situation)? no Transect ID: fill Is the area a potential Problem Area? yes () _ Plot ID: VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator K..d td c co 6, GI ,Cet p 0 • • HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: %of dominants OBL,FACW, &FAC: ! a U • Check all indicators that apply&explain below: Regional knowledge of plant communities Wetland plant list(nat'l or regional) OTHER Physiological or reproductive adaptations Morphological adaptations Technical Literature Wetland Plant Data Base • Hydrophytic vegetation present? e no • Rationale for decision/Remarks: . HYDROLOGY Is it the growing season? tig) no Water Marks: yes no Sediment Deposits: yes no Based on: Drift Lines: yes no Drainage Patterns: yes no Dept. of inundation: >Z inches .V Dr.. Oxidized Root(live roots) Local Soil Survey: yes no Channels<12 in. yes no Depth to free water inpit: inches`'' e 4 (4 FAC Neutral:p yes no Water-stained Leaves: yes no Depth to saturated soil: inches Check all that apply &explain below: Other. Stream,Lake or gage data: Aerial photographs: Other: Wetland hydrology present? (� '..) no Rationale for decision/Remarks: S SOILS Map Un.t Name Drainage Class (Series Phase) Field observations confuui Yes No Taxonoi ny (subgroup) _ mapped type? Profile Description Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors Mottle abundance Texture, concretions, Drawing of soil (inches) (Munsell (Munsell size&contrast structure, etc. profile moist) moist) (match description) 0 !v f ie 37 3-o +g /0�j'R3 5 ,•7_ y 2 4/3 /1 s/i dep4ef,0.ti r . q,5 i:e 675 s,`/ Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) • Histosol Concretions Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other(explain in remarks) Hydric soils present? S'* Rationz le for decision/Remarks / pot/�Z Gv /u!'s � � ;x/ Wetly id Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? yes no Hydric soils present? yes no Is the sampling point ta no Wetland hydrology present? yes no within a wetland? Ration ale/Remarks: • NOTES: bEkimraNki OF. FILE FILE TITLE Aao 35m1A i IJK/ xJV ► l914, / 7.0 BASIN AND COMMUNITY PLAN AREAS The project site is located within the Black River basin, which is located within the Green River Basin. The Black River Basin Reconnaissance Report can be referred to in the following pages. 6882.008[NJM/jss/sm/ph] 8.0 OTHER PERMITS No other permits have been obtained at this time. 6882.008[NJM/jss/sm/ph] • M 9.0 EROSION/SEDIMENTATION CONTROL DESIGN 0 The erosion/sedimentation control plan will be submitted with the final construction document submittal. • 6882.008 [NJM/jss/sm/ph] 10.0 ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS No additional documents provided. 6882.008 [NJM/jss/sm] 11.0 MAINTLNANut. AND OPERATIONS MANUAL 11.0 MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS MANUAL The following Maintenance and Operations Manual has been included for a properly operating system. 6882.008 [NJM/jss/sm] KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR PRIVATELY MAINTAINED DRAINAGE FACILITIES NO: 1 - PONDS Maintenance Conditions When Maintenance Results Expected Component Defect Is Needed When Maintenance Is Performed General Trash & Debris My trash and debris which exceed 1 Trash and debris cleared from site cubic foot per 1000 square feet (this is about equal to the amount of trash it would take to fill up one standard size office garbage can). In general, there should be no visual evidence of dumping. Poisonous My poisonous vegetation which may No danger of poisonous vegetation where Vegetation constitute a hazard to County personnel County personnel or the public might or the public. Examples of poisonous normally be. (Coordination with vegetation include: tansy ragwort, poison Seattle/King County Health Department) oak, stinging nettles, devils club. Pollution Oil,gasoline, or other contaminants of No contaminants present other than a one gallon or more or any amount found surface film. (Coordination with that could: 1) cause damage to plant, Seattle/King County Health Department) animal,or marine life; 2) constitute a fire hazard; or 3) be flushed downstream during rain storms. Unmowed Grass/ tf facility is located in private residential When mowing Is needed, grass/ground Ground Cover area, mowing is needed when grass cover should be mowed to 2 inches in exceeds 18 inches in height. In other height. areas,the general policy is to make the pond site match adjacent ground cover and terrain as long as there is no interference with the function of the facility. Rodent Holes Any evidence of rodent holes if facility is Rodents destroyed and dam or berm acting as a dam or berm,or any evidence repaired. (Coordination with Seattle/ of water piping through dam or berm via King County Health Department) rodent holes. Insects When insects such as wasps and hornets Insects destroyed or removed from site. interfere with maintenance activities. Tree Growth Tree growth does not allow maintenance Trees do not hinder maintenance access or interferes with maintenance activities. Selectively cultivate trees such activity (i.e., slope mowing, silt removal, as alders for firewood. vactoring or equipment movements). tf trees are not interfering with access, leave trees alone. Side Sopes of Erosion Eroded damage over 2 inches deep Slopes should be stabilized by using Pond where cause of damage is still present or appropriate erosion control measure(s): where there is potential for continued e.g., rock reinforcement, planting of erosion. grass, compaction. Storage. Area Sediment Accumulated sediment that exceeds 10% Sediment cleaned out to designed pond of the designed pond depth. shape and depth; pond reseeded if necessary to control erosion. Pond D kes Settlements Any part of dike which has settled 4 Dike should be built back to the design inches lower than the design elevation. elevation. Emergency Rock Missing Only one layer of rock exists above native Replace rocks to design standards. Overflow/Spillway soil in area five square feet or larger, or any exposure of native soil. A-1 1/90 KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL NO. 4 - CONTROL STRUCTURE/FLOW RESTRICTOR Maintenance Conditions When Maintenance Results Expected Ccmponent Defect Is Needed When Maintenance Is Performed Genera Trash and Debris Distance between debris build-up and All trash and debris removed. (Includes bottom of orifice plate is less than 1-1/2 Sediment) feet. Structural Damage Structure is not securely attached to Structure securely attached to wall and manhole wall and outlet pipe structure outlet pipe. should support at least 1,000 pounds of up or down pressure. Structure is not in upright position (allow Structure in correct position. up to 10%from plumb). Connections to outlet pipe are not Connections to outlet pipe are watertight; watertight and show signs of rust. structure repaired or replaced and works as designed. Any holes—other than designed holes— Structure.as no holes other than in the structure. designed holes. Cleanout ,iate Damaged or Cleanout gate is not watertight or is Gate is watertight and works as designed. Missing missing. Gate cannot be moved up and down by Gate moves up and down easily and is one maintenance person. watertight. Chain leading to gate is missing or Chain is in place and works as designed. damaged. Gate is rusted over 50%of its surface Gate is repaired or replaced to meet area. design standards. _ e Plate Damaged or Control device is not working properly Plate is in place and works as designed. Missing due to missing, out of place, or bent orifice plate. Obstructions Any trash,debris, sediment,or vegetation Plate is free of all obstructions and works blocking the plate. as designed. Overflow Pipl Obstructions Any trash or debris blocking (or having Pipe is free of all obstructions and works the potential of blocking) the overflow as designed. pipe. Manhole See 'Closed Detention Systems" Standard See "Closed Detention Systems" Standard No. 3. No. 3. Catch Basin See "Catch Basins" Standard No. 5. See "Catch Basins" Standard No. 5. A-4 1/90 KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL NO. 5 - CATCH BASINS Maintenance Conditions When Maintenance Results Expected Component Defect Is Needed When Maintenance Is Performed General Trash & Debris Trash or debris of more than 1/2 cubic No trash or debris located immediately (Includes foot which is located immediately in front front of catch basin opening. Sediment) of the catch basin opening or is blocking capacity of basin by more than 10%. Trash or debris (in the basin) that No trash or debris in the catch basin. exceeds 1/3 the depth from the bottom of basin to invert of the lowest pipe into or out of the basin. Trash or debris in any inlet or outlet pipe Inlet and outlet pipes free of trash or blocking more than 1/3 of its height. debris. Dead animals-or vegetation that could No dead animals or vegetation present generate odors that would cause within the catch basin. complaints or dangerous gases (e.g., methane). Deposits of garbage exceeding 1 cubic No condition present which would attract foot in volume. or support the breeding of insects or rodents. Structural Damage Corner of frame extends more than 3/4 Frame is even with curb. to Frame and/or inch past curb face into the street (if Top Slab applicable). Top slab has holes larger than 2 square Top slab is free of holes and cracks. inches or cracks wider than 1/4 inch (intent is to make sure all material is running into the basin). Frame not sitting flush on top slab, i.e., Frame is sitting flush on top slab. separation of more than 3/4 inch of the frame from the top slab. Cracks in Basin Cracks wider than 1/2 inch and longer Basin replaced or repaired to design Walls/Bottom than 3 feet, any evidence of soil particles standards. entering catch basin through cracks,or maintenance person judges that structure is unsound. Cracks wider than 1/2 inch and longer No cracks more than 1/4 inch wide at the than 1 foot at the joint of any inlet/outlet joint of inlet/outlet pipe. pipe or any evidence of soil particles entering catch basin through cracks. Settlement/ Basin has settled more than 1 inch or has Basin replaced or repaired to design Misalignment rotated more than 2 inches out of standards. alignment. Fire Hazard Presence of chemicals such as natural No flammable chemicals present. gas,oil, and gasoline. Vegetation Vegetation growing across and blocking No vegetation blocking opening to basin. more than 10%of the basin opening. Vegetation growing in inlet/outlet pipe No vegetation or root growth present. joints that is more than six inches tall and less than six inches apart. Pollution Nonflammable chemicals of more than No pollution present other than surface 1/2 cubic foot per three feet of basin film. length. A-5 1/90 KIN3 COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL NO. 5 - CATCH BASINS (Continued) .A1Intenance Conditions When Maintenance Results Expected Ccmponent Defect Is Needed When Maintenance la Performed Catch 3asin Cover Cover Not in Place Cover is missing or only partially in place. Catch basin cover is closed. Any open catch basin requires maintenance. Locking Mechanism cannot be opened by one Mechanism opens with proper tools. Mechanism Not maintenance person with proper tools. Working Bolts Into frame have less than 1/2 inch of thread. Cover Difficult to One maintenance person cannot remove Cover can be removed by one Remove lid after applying 80 lbs. of lift; intent is maintenance person. keep cover from sealing off access to maintenance. Ladder Ladder Rungs Ladder is unsafe due to missing rungs, Ladder meets design standards and Unsafe misalignment, rust,cracks, or sharp allows maintenance person safe access. edges. Metal Grates Grate with opening wider than 7/8 inch. Grate openings meet design standards. (if applicable) Trash and Debris Trash and debris that is blocking more Grate free of trash and debris. than 20%of grate surface. Damaged or Grate missing or broken member(s) of Grate is in place and meets design Missing the grate. standards. A-6 1/90 KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAJ NO. 6 - DEBRIS BARRIERS (e.g. Trash Racks) Maintenance Conditions When Maintenance Results Expected Component Defect is Needed When Maintenance is Performed General Trash and Debris Trash or debris that is plugging more Barrier clear to receive capacity flow. than 20% of the openings in the barrier. Metal Damaged/ Missing Bars are bent out of shape more than 3 Bars in place with no bends more thar, Bars inches. 3/4 inch. Bars are missing or entire barrier is Bars in place according to design. missing. Bars are loose and rust Is causing 50% Repair or replace barrier to design deterioration to any part of barrier. standards. A-7 1/90 KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL NO. 7 - ENERGY DISSIPATORS Aeintenance Conditions When Maintenance Results Expected Component Defect Is Needed When Maintenance is Performed Exter ial: Rock Pad Missing or Moved Only one layer of rock exists above native Replace rocks to design standard. Rock soil in area five square feet or larger, or any exposure of native soil. Dispe Sion Trench Pipe Plugged with Accumulated sediment that exceeds 20% Pipe cleaned/flushed so that it matches Sediment of the design depth. design. Not Discharging Visual evidence of water discharging at Trench must be redesigned or rebuilt to Water Properly concentrated points along trench (normal standard. condition is a"sheet flow"of water along trench). Intent is to prevent erosion damage. Perforations Over 1/2 of perforations in pipe are Clean or replace perforated pipe. Plugged plugged with debris and sediment. Water Flows Out Maintenance person observes water Facility must be rebuilt or redesigned to Top of'Distributor" flowing out during any storm less than standards. Catch Basin the design storm or it is causing or appears likely to cause damage. Receiving Area Water in receiving area is causing or has No danger of landslides. Over-Saturated potential of causing landslide problems. Internal Manhol i/Chamber Worn or Damaged Structure dissipating flow deteriorates to Replace structure to design standards. Posts, Baffles, 1/2 or original size or any concentrated Sides of Chamber worn spot exceeding one square foot which would make structure unsound. Other Defects See "Catch Basins' Standard No.5 See "Catch Basins" Standard No. 5 A-8 1/90 KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUA NO. 8 - FENCING Maintenance Conditions When Maintenance Results Expected Component Defect Is Needed When Maintenance is Performed General Missing or Broken Any defect in the fence that permits easy Parts in place to provide adequate Parts entry to a facility. security. • Parts broken or missing. Broken or missing parts replaced. Erosion Erosion more than 4 inches high and 12- No opening under the fence that excf ds 18 inches wide permitting an opening 4 inches in height. under a fence. Wire Fences Damaged Parts Posts out of plumb more than 6 inches. Posts plumb to within 1-1/2 inches. Top rails bent more than 6 inches. Top rail free of bends greater than 1 1. Any part of fence (including posts,top Fence is aligned and meets design rails, and fabric) more than 1 foot out of standards. design alignment. Missing or loose tension wire. Tension wire in place and holding fat Missing or loose barbed wire that is Barbed wire in place with less than 3i sagging more than 2-1/2 inches between inch sag between posts. posts. Extension arm missing, broken, or bent Extension arm in place with no bends out of shape more than 1-1/2 inches. larger than 3/4 inch. Deteriorated Paint Part or parts that have a rusting or scaling Structurally adequate posts or parts w or Protective condition that has affected structural a uniform protective coating. Coating adequacy. Openings in Fabric Openings in fabric are such that an 8- No openings in fabric. inch-diameter ball could fit through. • II A-9 KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL NO. 9 - GATES ..lalntenance Conditions When Maintenance Results Expected c omponent Defect Is Needed When Maintenance is Performed Gen Iral Damaged or Missing gate or locking devices. Gates and locking devices in place. Missing Members Broken or missing hinges such that gate Hinges intact and lubed. Gate is working cannot be easily opened and closed by a freely. maintenance person. Gate Is out of plumb more than 6 inches Gate is aligned and vertical. and more than 1 foot out of design alignment. Missing stretcher bar, stretcher bands, Stretcher bar, bands, and ties in place. and ties. Openings in Fabric See"Fencing' Standard No. 8 See "Fencing" Standard No. 8 • A-10 I/90 KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUA NO. 10 - CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS (Pipes & Ditches) Maintenance Conditions When Maintenance Results Expected Component Defect Is Needed When Maintenance Is Performed Pipes Sediment &Debris Accumulated sediment that exceeds 20% Pipe cleaned of all sediment and d s. of the diameter of the pipe. Vegetation Vegetation that reduces free movement of All vegetation removed so water flo, water through pipes. freely through pipes. Damaged Protective coating is damaged; rust is Pipe repaired or replaced. causing more than 50%deterioration to any part of pipe. Any dent that decreases the cross section Pipe repaired or replaced. area of pipe by more than 20%. Open Ditches Trash &Debris Trash and debris exceeds 1 cubic foot Trash and debris cleared from ditch per 1,000 square feet of ditch and slopes. Sediment Accumulated sediment that exceeds 20% Ditch cleaned/flushed of all sedime nd of the design depth. debris so that it matches design. Vegetation Vegetation that reduces free movement of Water flows freely through ditches. water through ditches. Erosion Damage to See "Ponds" Standard No. 1 See "Ponds" Standard No. 1 Slopes Rock Lining Out of Maintenance person can see native soil Replace rocks to design standard. Place or Missing (if beneath the rock lining. Applicable) Catch Basins See "Catch Basins" Standard No. 5 See "Catch Basins` Standard No. 5 Debris Barriers See"Debris Barriers' Standard No. 6 See "Debris Barriers" Standard No. I (e.g., Trash Rack) A-11 ?s0 KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL NO. 11 - GROUNDS (Landscaping) ,dlaintenance Conditions When Maintenance Results Expected Component Defect Is Needed When Maintenance is Performed Ger oral Weeds Weeds growing in more than 20% of the Weeds present in less than 5%of the (Nonpoisonous) landscaped area (trees and shrubs only). landscaped area. Safety Hazard Any presence of poison ivy or other No poisonous vegetation present in a poisonous vegetation. landscaped area. Trash or Utter Paper, can, bottles, totalling more than 1 Area clear of litter. cubic foot within a landscaped area (trees and shrubs only) of 1,000 square feet. Treys and Shrubs Damage Limbs or parts of trees or shrubs that are • Trees and shrubs with less than 5% of the split or broken which affect more than total foliage with split or broken limbs. 25%of the total foliage of the tree or shrub. Trees or shrubs that have been blown Tree or shrub in place free of injury. down or knocked over. Trees or shrubs which are not adequately Tree or shrub in place and adequately supported or are leaning over, causing supported; remove any dead or diseased exposure of the roots. trees. A-12 1/90 KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANU L NO. 12 - ACCESS ROADS/EASEMENTS Maintenance Conditions When Maintenance Results Expected Component Defect Is Needed When Maintenance Is Perform€ General Trash and Debris Trash and debris exceeds 1 cubic foot Trash and debris cleared from si per 1,000 square feet, i.e., trash and debris would fill up one standard size garbage can. Blocked Roadway Debris which could damage vehicle tires Roadway free of debris which co (glass or metal). damage tires. Any obstructions which reduce clearance Roadway overhead clear to 14 fe sigh. above road surface to less than 14 feet. Any obstructions restricting the access to Obstruction removed to allow at IE nst a a 10-to 12-foot width for a distance of 12-foot access. more than 12 feet or any point restricting access to less than a 10-foot width. Road Surface Settlement, When any surface defect exceeds 6 `i,oad surface uniformly smooth v no Potholes, Mush inches in depth and 6 square feet in area. evidence of settlement, potholes, 'sh Spots, Ruts In general,any surface defect which spots, or ruts. hinders or prevents maintenance access. Vegetation in Road Weeds growing in the road surface that Road surface free of weeds taller n 2 Surface are more than 6 inches tall and less than inches. 6 inches apart within a 400-square-foot area. Shoulders and Erosion Damage Erosion within 1 foot of the roadway more Shoulder free of erosion and mate ig Ditches than 8 inches wide and 6 inches deep. the surrounding road. 0 Weeds and Brush Weeds and brush exceed 18 inches in Weeds and brush cut to 2 inches height or hinder maintenance access. height or cleared in such a way a allow maintenance access. 0 A-13 1/90