Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutW_Waiver_Form_20210521_v1.pdfSECTION 2 WAIVER FORM Per direction from the City, the PPUD Submittal Checklist with edits from City Staff has been included as the Waiver Form for sections of the PPUD that are not required for this project. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 1 H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\Preliminary Planned Urban Development.doc Rev: 9/2019 PPUD SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS PRELIMINARY PLANNED URBAN DEVELOPMENT Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 Phone: 425-430-7294 | www.rentonwa.gov PURPOSE: The purpose of Planned Unit Development review is to preserve and protect natural features of the land, especially where steep slopes or other environmentally critical areas exist. Additionally, the Planned Unit Development process is intended to encourage innovation and creativity in the development of residential, business, manufacturing, or mixed use developments by permitting a variety in the type, design, and arrangement of structures and improvements. FREE CONSULTATION MEETING: Prior to submitting an application, the applicant should informally discuss the proposed development with the Planning Division. The Planning Division will provide assistance and detailed information on the City’s requirements and standards. Applicants may also take this opportunity to request the waiver of the City’s typical application submittal requirements, which may not be applicable to the specific proposal. For further information on this meeting, see the instruction sheet entitled “Submittal Requirements: Pre-Application.” APPLICATION SCREENING: Applicants are required to bring in a CD or USB portable (flash/hard) drive (or other device or pathway as approved by your assigned project manager) with one PDF file of the application package for informal review by staff, prior to scheduling an intake meeting. Please allow approximately 45 minutes for application screening. COMPLETE APPLICATION REQUIRED: In order to accept your application, each of the numbered items must be submitted at the same time. If you have received a prior written waiver of a submittal item(s) during a pre-application meeting, please provide the waiver form in lieu of any submittal item not provided. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL HOURS: Applications should be submitted to Planning Division staff at the 6th floor counter of Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. Please call your assigned project manager to schedule an appointment or call 425 -430- 7294 to reach the Planning Division. Due to the screening time required, applications delivered b y messenger cannot be accepted. ADDITIONAL PERMITS: Additional permits from other agencies may be required. It is the applicant’s responsibility to obtain these other approvals. Information regarding these other requirements may be found at http://apps.oria.wa.gov/opas/. Williams Ave Prop. / South Grady PUD 200327MH 2 H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\Preliminary Planned Urban Development.doc Rev: 09/2019 All Plans and Attachments are subject to Electronic File Standards APPLICATION MATERIALS: 1. Pre-Application Meeting Summary: If the application was reviewed at a “pre-application meeting.” 2. Waiver Form: If you received a waiver form during or after a “pre-application meeting.” 3. Land Use Permit Master Application Form: The standardized application form used for the majority of land use permit applications including, but not limited to, the following: a. Owner, applicant, and contact person names, addresses and telephone numbers; b. Notarized signatures of all current property owners; c. Name of the proposed project; d. Project/property address; e. King County Assessor’s tax account number; f. Existing and proposed land uses; g. Existing and, if applicable, proposed Comprehensive Plan map designation; h. Existing and, if applicable, proposed zoning designation; i. Site area; j. Estimated project cost; k. Whether or not the project site contains any environmentally sensitive areas; and l. Property legal description. Note: The application must have notarized signatures of ALL current property owners listed on the Title Report. If the property owner is a corporation, the authorized representative must attach proof of signing authority on behalf of the corporation. The legal description of the property must be attached to the application form. 4. Fees: The application must be accompanied by the required application fee (see Fee Schedule). Please call 425-430-7294 to verify the exact amount required. Checks should be made out to the City of Renton and cannot be accepted for over the total fee amount. Credit cards may also be used to pay required application fees. Fees are paid at Cashier on the 1st Floor City Hall. 5. Project Narrative: A clear and concise description and summary of the proposed project, including the following: a. Project name, size and location of site; 3 H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\Preliminary Planned Urban Development.doc Rev: 09/2019 b. Zoning designation of the site and adjacent properties; c. Current use of the site and any existing impro vements; d. Special site features (i.e., wetlands, water bodies, steep slopes); e. Statement addressing soil type and drainage conditions; f. Proposed use of the property and scope of the proposed development (i.e., height, square footage, lot coverage, parking, access, etc.); g. Proposed off-site improvements (i.e., installation of sidewalks, fire hydrants, sewer main, etc.); h. Total estimated construction cost and estimated fair market value of the proposed project; i. Estimated quantities and type of materials involved if any fill or excavation is proposed; j. Number, type and size of trees to be removed; k. Explanation of any land to be dedicated to the City; and l. For shoreline applications only: i. Name of adjacent water area or wetlands, ii. Nature of existing shoreline – describe:  Type of shoreline (i.e., lake, stream, lagoon, marsh, bog, floodplain, floodway);  Type of beach (i.e., accretion, erosion, high bank-low bank);  Type of material (i.e., sand, gravel, mud, clay, rock, riprap); and  The extent and type of any bulkheading, and iii. The number and location of structures and/or residential units (existing and potential) which might have views obstructed as a result of the proposed project; and m. The proposed number, size, and density of the new lots, for subdivision applications only. 6. Environmental Checklist: The standard State of Washington form required under WAC 197- 11-742 and 197-11-960. 7. Project Sequencing Plan: A narrative that outlines what order development phases will be built in and at what estimated times they will be developed within the life of the associated Master Plan. 8. Rezone, Variance, Modification, or Conditional Use Justification: Please contact the Planning Division to determine whether your project proposal triggers any additional land use permits. If so, additional information may be required. The application will require two Conditional Use Permits. One for density increase up to 150 units per net acre for the CD zoned property and one for height increase as CD zoned properties are limited in height to 20-feet higher than the neighboring residential zone. The outright max for this property would be 44-feet without the CUP. Please provide written justification for the two CUPs responding to the recently adopted density and height increase criteria from Ord 5965 which has not yet been codified but is effective. Density and height criteria can be found on ordinance pages 24-27. 4 H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\Preliminary Planned Urban Development.doc Rev: 09/2019 9. Density Worksheet: This can be found on the City’s website https://edocs.rentonwa.gov/Documents/ElectronicFile.aspx?docid=955782&dbid=1&repo=CityofRe nton 10. Construction Mitigation Description: A written narrative addressing each of the following: a. Please provide a written narrative addressing each of the following: i. Proposed construction dates (begin and end dates); ii. Hours and days of operation; iii. Proposed hauling/transportation routes; iv. Measures to be implemented to minimize dust, traffic and transportation impacts, erosion, mud, noise, and other noxious characteristics; v. Any special hours proposed for construction or hauling (i.e. weekends, late nights); and vi. Preliminary traffic control plan. Note: If your project requires the use of cranes, please contact the City’s Airport Manager at 425- 430-7471 to determine whether Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) notification will be required. 11. Urban Design Regulations Review Packet: A set of submission materials required for projects subject to the Urban Design Regulations in RMC 4-3-100: a. Site plan, land use review; b. Elevations, architectural; c. Floor plans general; d. Narrative outlining how the applicant’s proposal addresses the City’s Urban Design Regulations. Note: Urban Design Regulation Check List can be found at https://www.codepublishing.com/WA/Renton/html/Renton04/Renton0403/Renton040310 0.html 12. Statement Addressing Project’s Compliance With Each of the Following Decision Criteria: Please provide a statement describing City Code provisions to be modified and address the following criteria: 1. Demonstration of Compliance and Superiority Required : Applicants must demonstrate that a proposed development is in compliance with the purposes of this Section and with the Comprehensive Plan, that the proposed development will be superior to that which would result without a planned urban development, and that the development will not be unduly detrimental to surrounding properties. 2. Public Benefit Required: In addition, applicants shall demonstrate that a proposed 5 H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\Preliminary Planned Urban Development.doc Rev: 09/2019 development will provide specifically identified benefits that clearly outweigh any adverse impacts or undesirable effects of the proposed planned urban development, particularly those adverse and undesirable impacts to surrounding properties, and that the proposed development will provide one or more of the following benefits than would result from the development of the subject site without the proposed planned urban development: a. Critical Areas: Protects critical areas that would not be protected otherwise to the same degree as without a planned urban development; or b. Natural Features: Preserves, enhances, or rehabilitates natural features of the subject property, such as significant woodlands, native vegetation, topography, or noncritical area wildlife habitats, not otherwise required by other City regulations; or c. Public Facilities: Provides public facilities that could not be required by the City for development of the subject property without a planned urban development; or d. Use of Sustainable Development Techniques: Design which results in a sustainable development; such as LEED certification, energy efficiency, use of alternative energy resources, low impact development techniques beyond that required by the Surface Water Design Manual, etc.; or e. Overall Design: Provides a planned urban development design that is superior to the design that would result from development of the subject property without a planned urban development. A superior design may include the following: i. Open Space/Recreation:  Provides increased open space or recreational facilities beyond standard code requirements and considered equivalent to features that would offset park mitigation fees in Resolution 3082; and  Provides a quality environment through either passive or active recreation facilities and attractive common areas, including accessibility to buildings from parking areas and public walkways; or ii. Circulation/Screening: Provides superior circulation patterns or location or screening of parking facilities; or iii. Landscaping/Screening: Provides superior landscaping, buffering, or screening in or around the proposed planned urban development; provided, common open space containing natural features may be left unimproved; or (Ord. 5917, 12-10- 2018) iv. Site and Building Design: Provides superior architectural design, placement, relationship or orientation of structures, or use of so lar energy; or v. Alleys: Provides alleys for proposed detached or attached units with individual, private ground related entries. (Ord. 5520, 12-14-2009; Ord. 5571, 11-15-2010; Ord. 5828, 12-12-2016) 6 H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\Preliminary Planned Urban Development.doc Rev: 09/2019 3. Additional Review Criteria: A proposed planned urban development shall also be reviewed for consistency with all of the following criteria: a. Building and Site Design: i. Perimeter: Size, scale, mass, character and architectural design along the planned urban development perimeter provide a suitable transition to adjacent or abutting lower density/intensity zones. Materials shall reduce the potential for light and glare. ii. Interior Design: Promotes a coordinated site and building design. Buildings in groups should be related by coordinated materials and roof styles, but contrast should be provided throughout a site by the use of varied materials, architectural detailing, building orientation or housing type; e.g., single family, detached, attached, townhouses, etc. b. Circulation: i. Provides sufficient streets and pedestrian facilities. The planned urban development shall have sufficient pedestrian and vehicle access commensurate with the location, size and density of the proposed development. All public and private streets shall accommodate emergency vehicle access and the traffic demand created by the development as documented in a traffic and circulation report approved by the City. Vehicle access shall not be unduly detrimental to adjacent areas. ii. Promotes safety through sufficient sight distance, separation of vehicles from pedestrians, limited driveways on busy streets, avoidance of difficult turning patterns, and minimization of steep gradients. iii. Provision of a system of walkways which tie residential areas to recreational areas, transit, public walkways, schools, and commercial activities. iv. Provides safe, efficient access for emergency vehicles. c. Infrastructure and Services: Provides utility services, emergency services, and other improvements, existing and proposed, which are sufficient to serve the development. d. Clusters or Building Groups and Open Space: An appearance of openness created by clustering, separation of building groups, and through the use of well- designed open space and landscaping, or a reduction in amount of impervious surfaces not otherwise required. e. Privacy and Building Separation: Provides internal privacy between dwelling units, and external privacy for adjacent dwelling units. Each residential or mixed use development shall provide visual and acoustical privacy for dwelling units and surrounding properties. Fences, insulation, walks, barriers, and landscaping are used, as appropriate, for the protection and aesthetic enhancement of the property, the privacy of site occupants and surrounding properties, and for screening of storage, mechanical or other appropriate areas, and for the reduction of noise. Windows are placed at such a height or location or screened to provide sufficient privacy. Sufficient light and air are provided to each dwelling unit. f. Building Orientation: Provides buildings oriented to enhance views from within the site by taking advantage of topography, building location and style. 7 H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\Preliminary Planned Urban Development.doc Rev: 09/2019 g. Parking Area Design: i. Design: Provides parking areas that are complemented by landscaping and not designed in long rows. The size of parking areas is minimized in comparison to typical designs, and each area related to the group of buildings served. The design provides for efficient use of parking, and shared parking facilities where appropriate. h. Phasing: Each phase of the proposed development contains the required parking spaces, open space, recreation spaces, landscaping and utilities necessary for creating and sustaining a desirable and stable environment, so that each phase, together with previous phases, can stand alone. 4. Compliance with Development Standards: Each planned urban development shall demonstrate compliance with the development standards contained in subsection E of this Section, the underlying zone, and any overlay districts; unless a modification for a specific development standard has been requested pursuant to subsection B2 of this Section. (Ord. 5153, 9-26-2005; Ord. 5571, 11-15-2010) 13. Plat Certificate or Title Report: Please provide a current Plat Certificate or Title Report obtained from a title company documenting ownership and listing all encumbrances of the involved parcel(s). The Title Report should include all parcels being developed, but no parcels that are not part of the development. If the Plat Certificate or Title Report references any recorded documents (i.e. easements, dedications, covenants), the referenced recorded document(s) must also be provided. All easements referenced in the Plat Certificate must be located, identified by type and recording number, and dimensioned on the Site Plan. 14. Draft Legal Documents: Please provide any proposed street dedications, restrictive covenants, draft Homeowners Association, or any other legal documents pertaining to the development and use of the property. 15. Neighborhood Detail Map: A map, drawn at a scale of one inch equals one hundred feet (1" = 100') or one inch equals two hundred feet (1" = 200') (or other scale approved by the Planning Division Director or designee). The map shall show the location of the subject sit e relative to the property boundaries of the surrounding parcels within approximately one thousand feet (1,000') or approximately two thousand five hundred feet (2,500') for properties over five (5) acres and identifying the subject site with a darker peri meter line than that of surrounding properties. The map shall also show the property’s lot lines, existing land uses, building outlines, City boundaries of the City of Renton (if applicable), north arrow (oriented to the top of the plan sheet), graphic scale used for the map, and City of Renton (not King County) street names for all streets shown. (Amd. Ord. 4963, 5 -13- 2002) 16. Proof of King County Plat Name Reservation: For PUD’s that include Preliminary Plats, please provide a Plat and Condominium Name Reservation Request form approved by the King County Recorder’s Office. The request form may be obtained from the King County Recorder’s Office website under Plat and Condominium Name Reservation Request. 8 H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\Preliminary Planned Urban Development.doc Rev: 09/2019 http://www.kingcounty.gov/business/Recorders/OnlineFormsandDocumentStandards.aspx The Recorders Office charges a $50 fee for name reservation, and reservation of the plat name expires one year after approval. 17. Affidavit of Installation of Public Information Sign(s): A notarized statement signed by the applicant of applicant’s representative attesting that the required public information sign(s) has been installed in accordance with City Code requirements. 18. Affidavit of Installation of Public Outreach Sign(s): Please complete and provide the attached notarized affidavit attesting the required public outreach sign(s) has been installed in accordance with the City Code requirements. See attachment titled “Public Outreach Signs” for information about the size and location requirements for public outreach signs. 19. Proof of Neighborhood Meeting: Please provide the following materials with the submittal of a complete development application: a. The notice provided to surrounding property owners within three hundred feet (300’) of the proposed development site; b. The mailing list used to send out meeting notices; c. An affidavit of mailing and posting notice(s); d. The meeting sign-in sheet; e. Materials presented at the meeting; f. Notes of the meeting including a summary of oral and written comments received; and g. If no members of the public attended the neighborhood meeting and/or persons in attendance made no comments, the required submittal materials shall reflect the absence of comment, attendance, or both. 20. Overall Plat Plan: If the scale of the project requires multiple plan sheets, please provide the entire plat plan on a single sheet. 21. Plat Plan: Please provide a fully-dimensioned plan prepared by a State of Washington registered professional land surveyor in accordance with RCW 18.43.020, drawn at a scale of 1" = 40' (or other size or scale approved by the Planning Division ) and including the information required by the City of Renton Subdivision Regulations in RMC 4 -7: a. Name of the proposed plat and space for the future City file number; b. Names and addresses of the engineer, licensed land surveyor, and property owners; c. Legal description of the property to be subdivided; d. Date, graphic scale, and north arrow oriented to the top of the paper/plan sheet; e. Vicinity map (a reduced version of the neighborhood detail map defined previously); 9 H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\Preliminary Planned Urban Development.doc Rev: 09/2019 f. Drawing of the subject property with all existing and proposed property lines dimensioned; g. Location of the subject site with respect to nearest street intersections (including driveways and/or intersections opposite the subject property), alleys and other rights of way; h. Names, locations, types, widths and other dimensions of existing and proposed streets, alleys, easements, parks, building setbacks, open spaces, and reservations. City code requires that private access easements be created via easement rather than creation of a separate tract; i. Location and dimensions of all easements referenced in the plat certificate with the recording number and type of easement (e.g. access, sewer, etc.) indicated. If any recorded easement is unmappable, include a note on the face of the plan indicating the recording number and the reason it can’t be mapped. j. Location, distances from existing and new lot lines, and dimensions of any existing structures, existing or proposed fencing or retaining walls, and free-standing signs. k. Location of existing conditions on or adjacent to the site which could hinder development. A legend listing the following included on the first sheet of the Short Plat Plan: a. Total area in acres of proposed plat; b. Proposed number of lots; c. Zoning of the subject site; d. Proposed square footage (gross and net) of each lot (net reflects deductions of private access easements and those portions of the lot narrower than 80% of the minimum lot width); e. Square footage of land in critical areas; f. Square footage of land in critical area buffers; g. Square footage of land in publicly dedicated streets; h. Square footage of land in private access easements; i. Density proposed and density permitted by code. For commercial/industrial properties please also include the following in the legend: a. Total area of existing impervious surface; b. Total area of existing undeveloped area; 10 H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\Preliminary Planned Urban Development.doc Rev: 09/2019 c. Square footage (by floor and overall total) of each individual building and/or use; d. Building footprint area; e. Percentage of lot covered by buildings and structures; f. Total area of pavement (existing to remain and new); g. Total area of landscaping; h. Building setbacks (required and proposed) between all stru ctures and property lines; i. Parking analysis per lot including the number of parking spaces required and provided. 22. Floor Plans: A basic line drawing plan of the general building layout showing walls, exits, windows, and designated uses indicating the proposed locations of kitchens, baths and floor drains, bedrooms and living areas, with sufficient detail for City staff to determine if an oil/water separator or grease interceptor is required and to determine sizing of side sewer. 23. Landscape Plan, Conceptual: A fully dimensioned plan, prepared by a landscape architect registered in the State of Washington, a certified nurseryman, or other similarly qualified professional, drawn at the same scale as the project site plan (or other scale approved by the Community and Economic Development Administrator), clearly indicating the following: a. Date, graphic scale, and north arrow; b. Location of proposed buildings, parking areas, access and existing buildings to remain; c. Names and locations of abutting streets and public improvements, including easements; d. Existing and proposed contours at five foot (5') intervals or less; e. Location, size, and purpose of planting areas, including those required in RMC 4-4-070, Landscaping, and those required in RMC 4-3-090, Shoreline Master Program Regulations; f. Location and height for proposed berming; g. Location and elevations for any proposed landscape-related structures such as arbors, gazebos, fencing, etc.; h. Location, size, spacing and names of existing and proposed shrubs, trees, ground covers, and decorative rockery or like landscape improvements in relationship to proposed and existing utilities; and i. The location, size and species of all protected trees on site. Protected trees shall have the approximate drip line shown (see RMC 4-4-130, Tree Retention and Land Clearing 11 H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\Preliminary Planned Urban Development.doc Rev: 09/2019 Regulations). (Ord. 5100, 11-1-2004; Ord. 5304, 9-17-2007; Ord. 5633, 10-24-2011; Ord. 5676, 12-3-2012) 24. Landscape Analysis, Lot Coverage, and Parking Analysis (For commercial/industrial properties only): Please provide a landscape and parking analysis including: a. Total square footage of the site and the footprints of all buildings b. Total square footage of existing and proposed impervious surface area(s) c. Square footage (by floor and overall total) of each individual building and/or use d. Percentage of lot covered by buildings or structures e. Number of parking spaces required by City code f. Number and dimensions of standard, compact, and ADA accessible spaces provided g. Square footage of parking lot landscaping (perimeter and interior) 25. Site Plan: A single fully dimensioned plan sheet drawn at a scale of one inch equals twenty feet (1" = 20') (or other scale approved by the Planning Division Director or designee) clearly indicating the following: a. Name of proposed project; b. Date, scale, and north arrow oriented to the top of the plan sheet; c. Drawing of the subject property with all property lines dimensioned and names of adjacent streets; d. Widths of all adjacent streets and alleys; e. The location of all existing public improvements including, but not limited to, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, median islands, street trees, fire hydrants, utility poles, etc., along the full property frontage; f. Location and dimensions of existing and proposed structures, parking and loading areas, driveways, existing trees on and abutting the site, existing or proposed fencing or retaining walls, freestanding signs, easements, refuse and recycling areas, freestanding liquid fixtures, utility junction boxes, public utility transformers, storage areas, buffer areas, open spaces, and landscaped areas; g. The location and dimensions of natural features such as streams, lakes, marshes and wetlands. Include boundaries of utility, open space, and/or critical area(s) tracts, square footage, and purpose statement of each tract. Clearly delineate the critical area and buffer boundaries within the tract and indicate a dimension for buffer width; h. Ordinary high water mark, existing and proposed, and name of water body if applicable; i. For wireless communication facilities, indicate type and locations of existing and new 12 H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\Preliminary Planned Urban Development.doc Rev: 09/2019 plant materials used to screen facility components and the proposed color(s) for the facility; j. A legend listing the following must be included on one of the site plan sheets: i. Total square footage of the site, ii. Square footage (by floor and overall total) of each individual building and/or use, iii. Total square footage of all buildings (footprint of each building), iv. Percentage of lot coverage, v. Square footage of all landscaping (total, parking lot, and wildlife habitat), vi. Allowable and proposed building height, vii. Building setbacks required by Code, viii. Proposed building setbacks, ix. Parking analysis, including:  Number of stalls required, by use; number of stalls provided, by use,  Sizes of stalls and angles,  Location and number of handicap stalls, compact, employee and/or guest parking stalls,  Location and size of curb cuts,  Traffic flow within the parking, loading, and maneuvering areas and ingress and egress,  Location of wheel stops,  Loading space,  Stacking space,  Location and dimensions of bicycle racks, carpool parking spaces, and other facilities designed to accommodate access to the site,  Square footage of interior parking lot landscaping; h. Footprint of all proposed buildings showing the location of building entrances, window openings, and landscape features (required for Urban Center Design Overlay District review packet only); i. Footprint of all abutting and adjacent buildings showing the location of building entrances, window openings, and landscape features (required for Urban Center Design Overlay District review packet only); 13 H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\Preliminary Planned Urban Development.doc Rev: 09/2019 Note: For nonconforming use or structure rebuild approval permits: draw on the scaled plan the exact sizes and locations of existing structures and uses, whether damaged or not; write on the scaled plan the dates these structures/uses were established; on a separate sheet, identify the subject property, abutting lots and buildings and list adjacent and abutting land uses. (Ord. 5028, 11-24-2003; Ord. 5757, 6-1-2015) 26. Architectural Elevations: A twenty four inch by thirty six inch (24" x 36") fully dimensioned architectural elevation plan drawn at a scale of one-fourth inch equals one foot (1/4" = 1') or one-eighth inch equals one foot (1/8" = 1') (or other size or scale approved by the Building Official) clearly indicating the information required by the “Permits” section of the currently adopted International Building Code and chapter 19.27 RCW (State Building Code Act, Statewide amendments), including, but not limited to, the following: a. Existing and proposed ground elevations; b. Existing average grade level underneath proposed structure; c. Height of existing and proposed structures showing finished rooftop elevations based upon site elevations for proposed structures and any existing/abutting structures; d. Building materials and colors including roof, walls, any wireless communication facilities, and enclosures; e. Fence or retaining wall materials, colors, and architectural design; f. Architectural design of on-site lighting fixtures; and g. Cross-section of roof showing location and height of rooftop equipment (including air conditioners, compressors, etc.) and proposed screening. h. Required for the Urban Center Design Overlay District review packet. i. Identify building elevations by street name and orientation, i.e., Burnett Ave. (west) elevation. ii. Show the location of rooflines, doors and window openings. iii. Indicate typical detailing around doors, windows and balconies indicating finishes, color and reflectivity of glazing. iv. Identify offsets in walls intended to meet the minimum requirements for building modulation indicating the amount of offset. v. Show on each elevation any roof top elements such as mechanical and elevator penthouses that protrude above the parapet or penetrate the roof and would be visible from other buildings of the same height. vi. Photographs of proposed materials from manufacturers’ catalogues. A materials board showing actual materials and colors referenced on the architectural elevations is recommended. i. Required for shoreline permits: i. Include measurements of the existing and proposed elevations of the stream, river, or lake bottom in relationship to the proposed structure, if the 14 H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\Preliminary Planned Urban Development.doc Rev: 09/2019 proposed structure is located fully or partially in, or over, the water. ii. Projects exceeding thirty five feet (35') in height must demonstrate compliance with the height requirement in RMC 4-3-090D7a. (Ord. 4821, 12- 20-1999; Ord. 5450, 3-2-2009; Ord. 5633, 10-24-2011) 27. Topography Map: A map showing the existing land contours using vertical intervals of not more than five feet (5'). For any existing buildings the map shall show the finished floor elevations of each floor of the building. 28. Tree Retention/Land Clearing (Tree Inventory) Plan: A completed tree retention worksheet accompanied by a full dimensional plan, drawn by a certified arborist or a licensed landscape architect, based on finished grade, drawn at the same scale as the project site plan with the northern property line at the top of the sheet, clearly showing the following: a. All property boundaries and adjacent streets; b. Location of all areas proposed to be cleared; c. Species and sizes of vegetation to be removed, altered or retained and the boundaries and predominant species of stands of trees consisting of five (5) or more trees. This requirement applies only to trees six inch (6") caliper and larger, fifty four inches (54") above grade, and the location, size and species of all protected trees on the site; d. For trees proposed to be retained, a complete description of each tree’s health, condition, and viability; e. For trees proposed to be retained, a description of the method(s) used to determine the limits of disturbance (i.e., critical root zone, root plate diameter, or a case-by-case basis description for individual trees); f. For trees proposed to be preserved within a tree protection tract, any special instructions for maintenance (e.g., trimming, ground clearing, root pruning, monitoring, aftercare, etc.); g. For trees not viable for retention, the reason(s) for removal based on poor health, high risk of failure due to structure, defects, unavoidable isolation (i.e., high blow down potential), or unsuitability of species, etc., and for which no reasonable alternative action is possible (pruning, cabling, etc.); h. A description of the impact of necessary tree removal to the remaining trees, including those in a grove or on abutting properties; i. For development applications, a discussion of timing and installation of tree protection measures that must include fencing and be in accordance with the tree protection standards as outlined in RMC 4-4-130H9, Protection Measures During Construction; j. The suggested location and species of supplemental trees to be used when required. The report shall include planting and maintenance specifications; k. Future building sites and drip lines of any trees which will overhang/over lap a construction line; 15 H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\Preliminary Planned Urban Development.doc Rev: 09/2019 l. Location and dimensions of rights-of-way, utility lines, fire hydrants, street lighting, and easements; m. Where the drip line of a tree overlaps an area where construction activities will occur, this shall be indicated on the plan; n. For allowed activities, including allowed exemptions, modifications, and variances, show all trees proposed to be removed in priority tree retention areas: slopes twenty five percent (25%) to thirty nine percent (39%), high or very high landslide hazard areas, and high erosion hazard areas; o. Show trees to be removed in protected critical areas: wetlands, Shorelines of the State, streams and lakes, floodways, floodplain slopes forty percent (40%) or greater, very high landslide hazard areas, and critical habitat if the activity is exempt or allowed by the critical areas regulations in RMC 4-3-050C3, Exemptions – Critical Areas and Buffers; p. Show all trees to be retained in critical area buffers; and q. In all other areas of the site, trees to be removed may be indi cated generally with clearing limit lines except for protected trees. The location, size, and species of all protected trees on a site shall be shown. The plan shall also differentiate any approved replacement trees from the protected trees. Replacement tr ees may be authorized in accordance with RMC 4-4-130H1e, Replacement Requirements, and the number of replacement trees shall be determined pursuant to any planned replanting areas in accordance with RMC 4-4-130H1c, Calculating Tree Retention. (Ord. 5304, 9-17-2007; Ord. 5748, 1-12-2015) 29. Tree Retention Worksheet: Please provide a completed City of Renton tree retention worksheet. https://edocs.rentonwa.gov/Documents/1/edoc/955781/Tree%20Retention%20Worksheet .pdf 30. Arborist Report: A report prepared by a certified arborist or licensed landscape architect that correlates with the Tree Retention/Land Clearing Plan and identifies size, species, health, and reason for any removal. The report shall identify the limits of disturbance for all retained trees. 31. Wetland Mitigation Plan – Preliminary: A preliminary wetland mitigation plan shall include the following: a. A site plan demonstrating sufficient area for replacement ratios; b. Proposed planting scheme for created, restored, and enhanced wetlands; c. Written report, formatted to eight and one-half inches (8.5") by eleven inches (11"), shall include: i. Identifying direct and indirect impacts of the project to the wetland area and wetland functions, environmental goals and objectives, and performance standards, and evaluating alternative methods of developing the property using 16 H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\Preliminary Planned Urban Development.doc Rev: 09/2019 the following criteria in this order: ● Avoiding any disturbances to the wetland or buffer; ● Minimizing any wetland or buffer impacts; ● Compensating for any wetland or buffer impacts; ● Restoring any wetlands or buffer impacted or lost temporarily; ● Creating new wetlands and buffers for those lost; and ● Enhancing an existing degraded wetland to compensate for lost functions and values, in addition to restoring a wetland or creating a wetland. ii. Evaluating each of the mitigation plan criteria found in RMC 4-3-050L. iii. For projects proposing a reduction in wetland buffer width with enhancement, providing a detailed analysis of the project’s compliance with each of the following criteria: ● The reduced buffer will function at a higher level than the standard buffer; ● An enhanced buffer shall never be less than seventy five percent (75%) of the standard width at its narrowest point; and ● The buffer area has less than fifteen percent (15%) slopes and no direct or indirect, short-term or long-term, adverse impacts to regulated wetlands, as determined by the City, will result from a regulated activity; and ● The proposal shall rely upon a site-specific evaluation and documentation of buffer adequacy based upon Wetlands in Washington State, Volume 1: A Synthesis of the Science (Ecology Publication No. 05-06-006, March 2005) and Wetlands in Washington State, Volume 2: Managing and Protecting Wetlands (Ecology Publication No. 04-06-008, April 2005), or similar approaches; and ● The proposed buffer standard is based on consideration of the best available science as described in WAC 365-195-905. iv. And, for projects proposing averaging in wetland buffer width with enhancement, providing a detailed analysis of the project’s compliance with each of the following criteria: ● There are existing physical improvements in or near the wetland and buffer; and ● That width averaging will not adversely impact the wetland function and values; and ● That the total area contained within the wetland buffer after averaging is 17 H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\Preliminary Planned Urban Development.doc Rev: 09/2019 no less than that contained within the required standard buffer prior to averaging; and ● A site-specific evaluation and documentation of buffer adequacy based upon Wetlands in Washington State, Volume 1: A Synthesis of the Science (Ecology Publication No. 05-06-006, March 2005) and Wetlands in Washington State, Volume 2: Managing and Protecting Wetlands (Ecology Publication No. 04-06-008, April 2005), or similar approaches have been conducted. The proposed buffer standard is based on consideration of the best available science as described in WAC 365-195- 905; and ● In no instance shall the buffer width be reduced by more than seventy five percent (75%) of the standard buffer. Greater buffer width reductions require review as a variance pursuant to RMC 4-9-250B; and ● An analysis of the effectiveness of the proposed Buffer Enhancement. (Ord. 4835, 3-27-2000; Ord. 5137, 4-25-2005; Ord. 5757, 6-1-2015) 32. Wetland Assessment: A wetland assessment includes the following: a. A description of the project and maps at a scale no smaller than one inch equals two hundred feet (1" = 200') showing the entire parcel of land owned by the applicant and the wetland boundary surveyed by a qualified surveyor, and pursuant to RMC 4-3- 050F2, Plans and Studies Required; b. A description of the vegetative cover of the wetland and adjacent ar ea including identification of the dominant plant and animal species; c. A site plan for the proposed activity at a scale no smaller than one inch equals two hundred feet (1" = 200') showing the location, width, depth and length of all existing and proposed structures, roads, stormwater management facilities, sewage treatment and installations within the wetland and its buffer; d. The exact locations and specifications for all activities associated with site development including the type, extent and method of operations; e. Elevations of the site and adjacent lands within the wetland and its buffer at contour intervals of no greater than five feet (5') or at a contour interval appropriate to the site topography and acceptable to the City; f. Top view and typical cross-section views of the wetland and its buffer to scale; g. The purposes of the project; h. Such other information as may be needed by the City, including but not limited to a study of hazards if present on site, the effect of any protective measures that might be taken to reduce such hazards; and any other information deemed necessary to verify compliance with the provisions of this Section. (Ord. 4587, 3-18-1996; Amd. Ord. 4835, 3-27-2000; Ord. 5137, 4-25-2005; Ord. 5757, 6-1-2015) 18 H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\Preliminary Planned Urban Development.doc Rev: 09/2019 Note: Please provide a map and a report if ANY wetlands are located on the subject property or within 100 feet of the subject property. The wetland report/ delineation must be prepared by a qualified professional and include the information specified in RMC 4-8- 120D.23. In addition, if any alteration to the wetland or buffer is proposed, a wetland mitigation plan is also required. See RMC 4-8-120D.23 for plan content requirements. 33. Standard Stream or Lake Study: A report shall be prepared by a qualified biologist and include the following information: a. Site Map: Site map(s) indicating, at a scale no smaller than one inch equals twenty feet (1" = 20') (unless otherwise approved by the Community and Economic Development Administrator): i. The entire parcel of land owned by the applicant, including one hundred feet (100') of the abutting parcels through which the water body(ies) flow(s); ii. The ordinary high water mark (OHWM) determined in the field by a qualified consultant pursuant to RMC 4-3-050G7, Streams and Lakes, (the OHWM must also be flagged in the field); iii. Stream or lake classification, as recorded in the City of Renton’s COR Maps, the City’s online interactive mapping application available through the City’s website, for the City of Renton Water Class or RMC 4-3-090 (if unclassified, see “Supplemental Stream or Lake Study” below); iv. Topography of the site and abutting lands in relation to the stream(s) and its/their buffer(s) at contour intervals of two feet (2') where slopes are less than ten percent (10%), and of five feet (5') where slopes are ten percent (10%) or greater; v. One hundred (100) year floodplain and floodway boundaries, including one hundred feet (100') of the abutting parcels through which the water body(ies) flow(s); vi. Site drainage patterns, using arrows to indicate the direction of major drainage flow; vii. Top view and typical cross-section views of the stream or lake bed, banks, and buffers to scale; viii. The vegetative cover of the entire site, including the stream or lake, banks, riparian area, and/or abutting wetland areas, extending one hundred feet (100') upstream and downstream from the property line. Include position, species, and size of all trees of at least six inch (6") caliper and larger, fifty four inches (54") above grade, and the location, size and species of all protected trees on the site that are within one hundred feet (100') of the OHWM, and the 19 H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\Preliminary Planned Urban Development.doc Rev: 09/2019 location of measures to protect trees on and abutting the site; ix. The location, width, depth, and length of all existing and proposed structures, roads, stormwater management facilities, wastewater treatment and installations in relation to the stream/lake and its/their buffer(s); and x. Location of site access, ingress and egress. Note: Please provide a report containing the information specified in RMC Section 4-8- 120D.19. In addition, if the project involves an unclassified stream, a supplemental stream or lake study is also required. If any alteration to a water-body or buffer is proposed a supplemental stream or lake study and mitigation plan are also required. 34. Flood Hazard Data: Flood hazard data includes: a. Plans in duplicate drawn to scale showing the nature, location, dimensions, and elevations of the area in question; existing or proposed structures, fill, storage of materials, drainage facilities, and the location of the foregoing; b. Elevation in relation to mean sea level of the lowest floor (including basement) of all structures; c. Elevation in relation to mean sea level to which any structure has been floodproofed; d. Certification by a registered professional engineer or architect that the floodproofing methods criteria in RMC 4-3-050I3c; and for any nonresidential structure meet the floodproofing; and e. Description of the extent to which a watercourse will be altered or relocated as a result of proposed development. (Ord. 4835, 3-27-2000) 35. Biological Assessment/Critical Areas Study: All development projects located in a floodplain and projects with the potential to impact fish (Chinook salmon, bull trout, steelhead trout), unexpected, new, rare or other endangered species habitat (bald eagles) shall provide a biological assessment/critical area study. The purpose of this assessment is to determine whether a proposed action is likely to: (1) adversely affect listed or de -listed species or designated critical habitat; (2) jeopardize the continued existence of species that are proposed for listing, or unexpected, new or rare species; or (3) adversely modify proposed critical habitat. A biological assessment/critical area study is a written study that evaluates the proposal, all probable impacts and risks related to the critical area, and recommends appropriate mitigation measures to adequately protect the functions and values of the critical area, and preserve anadromous fish and their habitat. The assessment/study shall be prepared by a person with experience and training in the scientific discipline appropriate for the relevant critical area in accordance with WAC 365- 195-095(4). A qualified professional must have obtained a B.S. or B.A. or equivalent degree in biology, engineering, environmental studies, fisheries, geomorphology, biological 20 H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\Preliminary Planned Urban Development.doc Rev: 09/2019 assessment, or related field, and have at least five (5) years of related work experience. a. A qualified professional for wetlands must be a professional wetland scientist with at least two (2) years of full-time work experience as a wetlands professional, including delineating wetlands using the federal manuals and supplements, preparing wetlands reports, conducting function assessments, and developing and implementing mitigation plans. b. A qualified professional for Habitat conservation must have a degree in biology or a related degree and professional experience related to the subject species c. A qualified professional for a geological hazard must be a professional engineer or geologist, licensed in the state of Washington. d. A qualified professional for Wellhead Protection Areas means a hydrogeologist, geologist, engineer, or other scientist with experience in preparing hydrogeologic assessments. The assessment/study shall use scientifically valid methods and studies in the analysis of critical area data and field reconnaissance and reference the source of the material used. Best available science is that scientific information applicable to the critical area prepared by local state or federal natural agencies or a qualified scientific professional that is consistent with the criteria established in WAC 395-195-900 through 365-195-925. The assessment/study shall contain, at a minimum, the following information, as applicable: a. The name and contact information of the applicant; b. The dates, names, and qualifications of the persons preparing the assessment/study and documentation of any fieldwork performed on the site; c. A description of the proposal and identification of the permits requested; d. A site plan showing: i. Identified critical areas, buffers and the development proposal with dimensions; ii. Topography at two-foot (2') intervals; iii. Limits of any areas to be cleared/impacted; and iv. A description of the proposed stormwater management plan for the development and consideration of impacts to drainage alterations; f. Accurate identification, location, and characterization of critical areas, water b odies, and buffers adjacent to the proposed project area or potentially im pacted by the proposed project; g. A statement specifying the accuracy of the assessment/study, assumptions used in the assessment/study, and explaining how best available science has been incorporated; h. Determination of the degree of hazard and risk from the proposal both on the site and on surrounding properties; i. An assessment of the probable cumulative impacts to the critical areas, their buffers and other properties resulting from the proposal; 21 H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\Preliminary Planned Urban Development.doc Rev: 09/2019 j. An evaluation of the project’s compliance with sections 7 and 9 of the Endangered Species Act; k. A description of reasonable efforts made to apply mitigation sequencing to avoid, minimize, and mitigate impacts to critical areas; l. Plans for adequate mitigation to offset any impacts and an explanation of how best management practices will be used to minimize impacts to critical area; and m. Recommendations for maintenance, short-term and long-term monitoring, contingency plans and security requirements. (Ord. 5675, 12-3-2012; Ord. 5757, 6-1-2015) 36. Habitat Data Report: Habitat data reports include: a. Site Plan: The site plan shall indicate: i. The vegetative cover types reflecting the general boundaries of the different plant communities on the site; ii. The exact locations and specifications for all activities associated with site development including the type, extent and method of operations; iii. Top view and typical cross-section views of critical habitat/wildlife habitat to scale; iv. The results of searches of the State Department of Fish and Wildlife’s Natural Heritage and Non-Game Data System databases; v. The results of searches of the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife Priority Habitat and Species database. b. Narrative Report: A narrative report shall be prepared to accompany the site plan which describes: i. The layers, diversity and variety of habitat found on the site; ii. The location of any migration or movement corridors; iii. The species typically associated with the cover types, including an identification of any critical wildlife species that might be expected to be found; iv. Identification of any areas that have been previously disturbed or degraded by human activity or natural processes; v. A summary of existing habitat functions and values, utilizing a habitat evaluation procedure or methodology approved by the City; vi. A summary of proposed habitat alterations and impacts and proposed habitat management program. Potential impacts may include but are not limited to clearing of vegetation, fragmentation of wildlife habitat, expected decrease in species diversity or quantity, changes in water quality, increases in human intrusion, and impacts on wetlands or water resources. (Ord. 4835, 3-27-2000) 37. Geotechnical Report: A study prepared in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical 22 H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\Preliminary Planned Urban Development.doc Rev: 09/2019 practices and stamped by a professional engineer licensed in the State of Washington which includes soils and slope stability analysis, boring and test pit logs, and recommendations on slope setbacks, foundation design, retaining wall design, material selection, and all other pertinent elements. If the evaluation involves geologic evaluations or interpretations, the report shall be reviewed and approved by a geologist. Further recommendations, additions or exceptions to the original report based on the plans, site conditions, or other supporting data shall be signed and sealed by the geotechnical engineer. If the geotechnical engineer who reviews the plans and specifications is not the same engineer who prepared the geotechnical report, the new engineer shall, in a letter to the City accompanying the plans and specifications, express his or her agreement or disagreement with the recommendations in the geotechnical report and state that the plans and specifications conform to his or her recommendations. If the site contains a geologic hazard regulated by the critical areas regulations, the preparation and content requirements of RMC 4 -8-120D, Table 18 shall also apply. If the site is within a channel migration zone, within shoreline jurisdiction, the geotechnical report shall also include a geomorphic assessment by a Washington State licensed geologist with engineering geology or hydrogeology specialty license plus experience in conducting fluvial geomorphic assessments. 38. Letter of Understanding Geologic Risk: The applicant, or the owner of the site, shall submit a letter to the City, with the plans and specifications, stating that he or she understands and accepts the risk of developing in an unstable area and that he or she will advise, in writing, any prospective purchasers of the site, or any prospective purchasers of structures or portions of structures on the site, of the unstable potential of the area. (Ord. 4835, 3-27- 2000) 39. Utilities Plan, Generalized (sewer, water, stormwater, transportation improvements): Please provide a plan drawn on 22" x 34" plan sheets using a graphic scale of 1" = 40' (or other size or scale approved by the Planning Division) clearly showing all existing (to remain) and proposed public or private improvements to be dedicated or sold to the public including, but not limited to, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, median islands, street trees, fire hydrants, utility poles, free-standing lighting fixtures, utility junction boxes, public utility transformers, etc., along the full property frontage. The finished floor elevations for each floor of proposed and existing (to remain) structures shall also be shown. 40. Drainage Control Plan: Plans drawn to scale and stamped by a State of Washington licensed engineer and complying with the requirements of RMC 4-6-030, Drainage (Surface Water) Standards, and the Surface Water Design Manual. (Amd. Ord. 4835, 3-27-2000; Ord. 5526, 2-1-2010) 41. Drainage Report: A report stamped by a State of Washington licensed engineer complying with the requirements stipulated by the City of Renton Survey and Drafting Standards, RMC 4-6-030, Drainage (Surface Water) Standards, and the Surface Water Design Manual. (Amd. Ord. 4835, 3-27-2000; Ord. 5526, 2-1-2010) 42. Street Profiles and Cross Sections: Please provide a plan that identifies the street profiles 23 H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\Preliminary Planned Urban Development.doc Rev: 09/2019 and grades of each street, together with typical cross sections indicating width of pavement, location and width of sidewalks, and location and size of utility mains. 43. Screening Detail, Refuse/Recycling: Please provide a detailed plan drawing, prepared to scale, showing location within property boundaries, heights, elevations, and building materials of proposed screening or of proposed plantings. 44. Traffic Study: A report prepared by a State of Washington licensed engineer containing the elements and information identified in the City of Renton “Policy Guidelines for Traffic Impact Analysis of New Development” in sufficient detail to define potential problems related to the proposed development and identify the improvements necessary to accommodate the development in a safe and efficient manner. 45. Colored Rendering: A computer-generated exterior color view of the proposed building(s), site, and landscaping in three (3) dimensional form. 46. Covenants, Existing: The recorded limitation on property which may be set forth in the property deed and/or identified in a title report. 47. Easements, Existing: A recorded document by the property owner granting one or more privileges to use the owner’s land to and/or for the use by the public, a corporation or another person or entity. Easements may be referenced by property deed and are identified in the property title report. 48. Grading Plan: A twenty two inch by thirty four inch (22" x 34") plan drawn by a State of Washington licensed civil engineer at a scale of one inch to forty feet (1" to 40') (horizonta l feet) and one inch to ten feet (1" to 10') (vertical feet) (or other size plan sheet or scale approved by the Planning Division Development Engineering Manager or designee) clearly indicating the following: a. Graphic scale and north arrow; b. Dimensions of all property lines, easements, and abutting streets; c. Location and dimension of all on-site structures and the location of any structures within fifteen feet (15') of the subject property or which may be affected by the proposed work; d. Accurate existing and proposed contour lines drawn at five foot (5'), or less, intervals showing existing ground and details of terrain and area drainage to include surrounding off-site contours within one hundred feet (100') of the site; e. Location of natural drainage systems, including perennial and intermittent streams, the 24 H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\Preliminary Planned Urban Development.doc Rev: 09/2019 presence of bordering vegetation, and floodplains; f. Setback areas and any areas not to be disturbed, including the location, size and species of all protected trees on site. Protected trees shall have the approximate drip line shown. The method of tree protection during grading and construction shall be shown. If grade changes in the vicinity of the protected trees are necessary, the method of reconciling the drip line with the finished elevation shall be included (see RMC 4-4-130, Tree Retention and Land Clearing Regulations); g. Finished contours drawn at five foot (5') intervals as a result of grading; h. Proposed drainage channels and related construction with associated underground storm lines sized and connections shown; and i. General notes addressing the following (may be listed on the cover sheet) i. Area in square feet of the entire property. ii. Area of work in square feet. iii. Both the number of tons and cubic yards of soil to be added, removed, or relocated. iv. Type and location of fill origin, and destination of any soil to be removed from site. v. Finished floor elevation(s) of all structures, existing and proposed. (Ord. 4835, 3 - 27-2000; Ord. 5304, 9-17-2007) 49. Hazardous Materials Management Statement: A statement which includes: a. A description of refueling of construction vehicles that will occur on the site and an inventory of hazardous materials expected to be temporarily stored, dispensed, used, or handled on the site. b. A description of how the requirements in RMC 4-4-030C7, Construction Activity Standards – Zones 1 and 2, will be met by the applicant. (Ord. 4851, 8-7-2000; Amd. Ord. 4992, 12-9-2002) All Plans and Attachments are subject to Electronic File Standards REVIEW PROCESS: Once a complete land use application package has been accepted for initial review, the Planning Division will post one notice of the pending application at or near the subject site and mail notices to property owners within 300 feet of the project site. The proposal wil l be routed to other City departments and other jurisdictions or agencies that may have an interest in the application. The reviewers have two (2) weeks to return their comments to the Planning Division. Within approximately 25 H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\Preliminary Planned Urban Development.doc Rev: 09/2019 two weeks, the Planning Division will prepare a report regarding the proposal’s compliance with applicable codes and the City’s review criteria. The application will then be presented to the City’s Environmental Review Committee. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) is comprised of the Administrator of Public Works, the Administrator of Community and Economic Development, the Administrator of Community Services, and the Fire Chief. The Committee is responsible for determining whether the proposal will result in significant adverse environmental impacts. To do this, the committee will consider such issues as environmental health hazards, wetlands, groundwater, energy and natural resources and will then issue its decision (Environmental Threshold Determination). The Environmental Review Committee will either issue a:  Determination of Non-Significance (DNS)-Make a determination the proposal will have no significant negative environmental impacts; or  Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance (DNS-M)-Make a determination the proposal, if modified, would have no significant negative environmental impacts; or  Determination of Significance (DS)-Make a determination the proposal will have significant adverse environmental impacts and require the applicant to submit an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) prepared by a qualified consultant. Once the Environmental Review Committee has issued its Environmental Threshold Determination (provided an EIS is not required), a public notice of the Determination is printed in the Renton Reporter and notice(s) are posted at or near the site. A 14-day appeal period commences following the publication date. At the discretion of the City, a separate and additional 15-day comment period may be added prior to the 14-day appeal period. After the fourteen (14) day appeal period has ended, the project can be scheduled for public hearing before the City Hearing Examiner, provided no appeals have been filed. A notice of the hearing will be published at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing, the project site will again be posted, and parties of record will receive notices via mail. Planning Division staff will issue a report to the Hearing Examiner seven (7) days prior to the hearing. This report will be mailed to the applicant or designated representative. Applicants are strongly encouraged to attend the public hearing for their proposal. City staff will first make a presentation to the Hearing Examiner about the proposal. Then the applicant and any citizens in support of the proposal will give testimony. When giving testimony, names and addresses must be stated for the record. Following this, individuals with neutral or opposing comments will give their testimony to the Hearing Examiner. City staff or the applicant will address additional questions raised throughout the hearing. The Hearing Examiner will review the Preliminary Planned Urban Development application and make a decision no later than ten (10) days following the public hearing. The Examiner will determine whether or not appropriate provisions are made for public health, safety and general welfare, open spaces, drainage, streets, alleys, water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks, 26 H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\Preliminary Planned Urban Development.doc Rev: 09/2019 playgrounds, and sites for schools and school grounds. The Examiner will also consider all other relevant facts in order to determine whether the public interest will be served by the PU D and/or dedication. The Examiner’s action to approve a preliminary PUD shall include an accurate description of the boundaries, land uses, number of units, description of phases (if any), and effective date of approval and expiration. APPEAL AND RECONSIDERATION PROCESS FOR DECISIONS: Any person, with standing, including the applicant, aggrieved by the Hearing Examiner’s action, may make a written application for reconsideration to the Hearing Examiner within 14 days of the date of the decision. After review of the reconsideration request, the Hearing Examiner may take whatever action is deemed proper. The Hearing Examiner’s written decision on the reconsideration request will be mailed to all parties of record within 10 days from the date the request was filed. If any party with standing is still not satisfied after a reconsideration decision has been issued, an appeal may be submitted within 14 days to the City Council. An appeal may be filed to the City Council without first requesting reconsideration by the Hearing Examiner; however, it must be filed within 14 days of the date the original decision was issued. After the Council’s decision is issued there will be a 21-day appeal period, during which time an appeal may be filed with Superior Court. See RMC 4-8-110 for further information on the appeal process and time frames. BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION PERMIT ISSUANCE AND INSTALLATION OF IMPROVEMENTS: In the City of Renton, a Building Permit must be obtained to build buildings and structures. A Construction Permit must be obtained to install utility lines, transportation improvements and undertake work in City right-of-ways. Building and Construction Permits are separate permits. The approval of the preliminary plan constitutes the City’s acceptance of the general project, including density, intensity, arrangement and design. Approval authorizes the applicant or subsequent owner to apply for final plan approval of the PUD or phase(s) thereof. Preliminary plan approval does not autho rize any building permits or any site work except that is required for surveying and engineering of the final plan or that required by the City for improvements that are necessary for a particular phase of the PUD for which final plan approval has been granted. An approved preliminary plan binds the future PUD site and all subsequent owners to the uses, densities, and standards of the preliminary plan until such time as a final plan is approved for the entire site or the preliminary plan is abandoned or expires subject to the provisions of RMC 4-9-150. EXPIRATION AND EXTENSIONS: Preliminary Approval of Planned Urban Development not associated with a Subdivision: The developer shall, within two (2) years of the effective date of action by the Hearing Examiner to approve the preliminary plan, submit to the Department of Comm unity and Economic Development a final development plan showing the ultimate design and specific details of the proposed planned urban development or the final phase or phases thereof. 27 H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\Preliminary Planned Urban Development.doc Rev: 09/2019 Upon application, the Hearing Examiner may grant an extension of the approved preliminary plan for a maximum of twelve (12) months. Application for such extension shall be made at least thirty (30) days prior to the expiration date of preliminary plan approval. Only one such extension may be granted for a planned urban development. Expiration of Preliminary Plan Approval with Concurrent Preliminary Subdivision: If a final development plan is not filed within five (5) years of the effective date of action by the Hearing Examiner or within the extended time period, if any, the planned urban development preliminary plan shall be deemed to have expired or been abandoned. Once a planned urban development preliminary plat has been deemed to have expired or been abandoned, a new application is required to proceed, and the development standards existing at the time of the new application shall apply. Expiration of Final Plan Approval: The developer shall prepare and submit building permit applications which are accepted as substantially complete to Community and Economic Development within six (6) months of the effective date of approval. The developer shall complete the approved planned urban development or any phase thereof included in the approved final plan within two (2) years from the date of the decision to approve the final plan by the Hearing Examiner, unless the Hearing Examiner designates a shorter time. Failure to complete the planned urban development, or any phase thereof, within this time limit will require the submittal of a new preliminary and final plan application in order to continue construction of the planned urban development. Failure to submit a new application or to complete the planned urban development once construction has begun shall constitute abandonment of the planned urban development subject to subsecti on K of RMC 4-9-150. Expiration of any building permit issued for a planned urban development shall be governed by the provisions of the applicable Building Code. Construction of any portion of the planned urban development requires a current approved planned urban development and a current building permit. Approval of a final plan for any phase of the approved preliminary plan shall constitute an extens ion for two (2) years of the remainder of the preliminary plan from the effective date of Hearing Examiner action on the preliminary plan. MERGER OF APPLICATIONS OR REVIEW STAGES: The applicant may request that review and decision on the preliminary plan and final plan be merged in one decision. The merged decision shall follow the procedural steps required of a preliminary plan. However, the applicant shall submit all plans and information in the detail required for a final plan and shall comply with all other requirements and standards for a final plan. A preliminary planned urban development may be considered simultaneously with any other land use permit required for a proposal, including but not limited to: preliminary plats, short plats, binding site plans, critical area modifications or variances, shoreline substantial developments permits, shoreline variances, shoreline conditional use permits, grading regulation modifications or variances, or other applications. Where merged, the review criteria for all of the applications shall be considered simultaneously with the planned urban development criteria in subsection C of RMC 4-9-150. Where there are conflicts with review criteria, the criteria of subsection C shall govern. Where merged, all permits shall be considered simultaneously as part of the planned urban development. The review 28 H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\Preliminary Planned Urban Development.doc Rev: 09/2019 authority shall be determined consistent with RMC 4-8-080C2, Review Authority for Multiple Permit Applications.