The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA98-009 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Charlotte Ann rcassens first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of the SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL CITY OF RENTON NOTICE OF ORDINANCES ADOPTED BY RENTON CITY COUNCIL 600 S. Washington Avenue, Kent, Washington 98032 Following is summary of ordinances adopted by the Renton City Council on July 13,1998: a daily newspaper published seven (7)times a week. Said newspaper is a legal ORDINANCE NO.4731 Annewspaper ofgeneralpublication and is now and has been for more than six months as ingordionnpre of ngth City 90 budget Washington providing for 1998 budget prior to the date of publication, referred to, printed and published in the English language amendments for capital operating costs continually as a daily newspaper in Kent, King County, Washington. The South County associated with Port Quendall. Journal has been approved as a legal newspaper byorder of the Superior Court of the Effective:7/R98 p� � � ORDINANCE NO.4732 lb State of Washington for King County. An ordinance of the City of Renton, clas- The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the South County Washington esta sification of certtbl ain aming the zoning properties to be be Journal (and not In supplemental form)which was regularly distributed to the subscribers annexed to the City of Renton(located bet- during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a ween the corporate boundaries of Newcastle and Renton,east of Coal Creek Parkway), to Residential 1 DU/AC (R-1) Notice of Ordinance Adopted and Residential 5 DU/AC(R-5)(May Valley Prezone-Phase II; File No. LUA 98-009, ECF). as published on: 7/17/98 Effective:.7/22/98 Complete text of these ordinances is posted at the Renton Municipal Building, The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of$43.88 200 Mill Avenue South; and the Renton Legal Number 4926 Public Library, 100 Mill Avenue South. i Upon request to the City Clerk's office (425-235-2501) copies will also be mailed fora fee. „. 7 Brenda Fritsvold Deputy City Clerk gal , ut Coun yJoumal Published in the South County Journal July 17,1998.4926 11 Subscribed and sworn before me on this��- day of I 0,c/, 19c6 00,,ii.i..i.//,,,,,, irjttag—e-----Y)EN ---70 a_ai C, . ..:,, io:r .: .fie'%, Notary Public of the State of Washington ��• residing in Renton •��;. • �.3Ta,�,, = King County, Washington C i ..._1 s' Q / O • % O �` G /,,///,`»ttlAS �,It\ \` .r CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 4732 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ESTABLISHING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES TO BE ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF RENTON TO RESIDENTIAL 1 DU/AC (R-1) AND RESIDENTIAL 5 DU/AC (R-5) (MAY VALLEY PREZONE-PHASE II; FILE NO. LUA 98-009, ECF). WHEREAS, under Chapter 31 (Zoning Code), of Title IV (Building Regulations), of Ordinance No. 4260 known as the "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton," as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described has not been zoned in the City of Renton; and WHEREAS, said property owners petitioned the City of Renton for assignment of zoning classifications prior to annexation, and the City Council having held two public hearings to consider this prezoning application, the first hearing being held on January 29, 1997, and the second hearing being held on April 14, 1997, and said zoning request being in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the City Council having duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The following described property in the City of Renton shall bear the following zoning designations once annexed to the City of Renton: Residential 1 DU/AC (R-1) and Residential 5 DU/AC (R-5), as hereinbelow specified, the Development Services Director is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning, to-wit: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein. 1 .. 1. ORDINANCE NO. 4732 (Said property, approximately 126 acres of unincorporated King County, is located between the corporate boundaries of Newcastle and Renton, east of Coal Creek Parkway) SECTION II. This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and five (5) days after its publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 13thday of July , 1998. 16\N-Alf4k V.)/ q14(0k, Brenda Fritsvold, Deputy City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 13thday of July 1998. c7004.."4"..../ Jes anner, Mayor Approved as rm: Lawrence J. Warren, Cit ttorney Date of Publication: July 17, 1998 (Summary) ORD.723:6/03/98:as. 2 MAY VAL.' 7Y PREZONE - HASE II Attachment A Zoning Designations .-- /.77.------r ii---- _,____ , , , . 1 , ._, i 0 ----____J r -1 . ; ___. : ..... ,_ , 0 I 1 1 tsil 1 I � e all y Rd : 1 [I._______— i __ 1 — .__—_.__. _ .___ 1 1 I R-1 ! ! I (Area A) r I _ _� hIct i 1 if i I � li 7.. o E *5th Ct I I i R-1 I ___._ _..... , , , Area C) i • — i I — 8- , i ; il " i (Ar 1 I ! : i` 11 ► •tom';! a l ?` _ ::� bin—d- _—:sii2:3- k I : I i 2 " " 1 2-2 r I Qj NE 2t P► n� � L �i �, — 3 tfg011— —7 " 1 .'sr:--- .7—',1.- -- I" ---// ' ; . / \I— r-t---, 1 ' 2 _ , SE-1-1-0-. th „, . c)N, 0„4, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning Zone Boundaries i:D�tJ/SP --- Renton City Limits O. Dennison, R. MacOnie 'tNero— 29 May 1998 0 600 1 ,200 1. 1 :7,200 114 ATTACHMENT A MAY VALLEY PREZONE-PHASE II PARCEL A--R-1 ZONING LEGAL DESCRIPTION: That portion of Government Lot 1 of Section 3,Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M.,King County,Washington, lying westerly of Stonegate, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 177, Pages 62 through 68, inclusive,Records of King County,Washington; TOGETHER WITH all of Government Lot 2 of Section 3,Township 23 North,Range 5 East, W.M., King County, Washington; and TOGETHER WITH that portion of Government Lot 3 of Section 3,Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M.,King County,Washington, lying northeasterly of the County Road(New Castle Road, Duvall Ave.NE, 138th Ave SE,Renton-Newcastle Rd.Rev.), LESS the southerly 135 feet thereof, as measured along the east line of said Government Lot 3; and TOGETHER WITH that portion of the South half(1/2)of Section 34,Township 24 North, Range 5 East,W.M., King County,Washington, lying southerly of SE May Valley Road(SE Coalfield Way, Thos. Rowse Rd, May Creek Rd.) and easterly of Coal Creek Parkway SE(Newcastle Rd. Rev., 136th Ave. SE). \\TS SERVER\SYS2\COMMON\DIVISION.S\P-TS\PLANNING\ANNEX\PREZONE\PH2LGLZN.DOC r MAY VALLEY PREZONE-PHASE II PARCEL B --R-5 ZONING LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Those portions of Government Lot 3, the Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter and the Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 3, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., King County, Washington,more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the northeast corner of the plat of Newcastle Terrace, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 87 of Plats, Page 30, Records of King County, Washington, said northeast corner also being the northeast corner of the Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of said section; Thence southerly along the easterly line of said subdivision and along the easterly line of said plat, to the southeast corner of said plat, said southeast corner also being a point on the south line of the North half(1/2)of the North half(1/2) of said Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter; Thence westerly along the southerly line of said subdivision and said plat, said southerly line also following the existing City Limits of Renton as annexed by Ordinance No. 3972, and continuing westerly along the southerly line of the North half(1/2) of the North half(1/2)of the Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of said section and said City Limits of Renton,to an intersection with the easterly right-of-way margin of the County Road(New Castle Road,Duvall Ave.NE, 138th Ave. SE); Thence northerly along said easterly right-of-way margin, to an intersection with a line 135 feet northerly of the south line of Government Lot 3 of said section, said 135 feet being measured along the east line of said subdivision; Thence easterly along said line,to an intersection with the east line of said subdivision; Thence southerly along said east line, a distance of 135 feet, to the southeast corner of said subdivision, said southeast corner also being the northwest corner of the Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of said section, and said southeast corner also being a point on the north line of said Newcastle Terrace plat; Thence easterly along the north line of said plat and said Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter, to the northeast corner of said plat and said subdivision, and the point of beginning. MAY VALLEY PREZONE-PHASE II PARCEL C--R-1 ZONING LEGAL DESCRIPTION: That portion of the East three quarters (3/4) of Government Lot 3 of Section 3, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M.,King County, Washington, lying Southwesterly of the County Road (New Castle Road, 138th Ave SE,Duvall Ave.NE, Coal Creek Parkway SE). \\TS SERVER\SYS2\COMMON\DIVISION.S\P-TS\PLANNING\ANNEX\PREZONE\PH2LGLZN.DOC • 4111 WAP Washington State Northwest Region Department of Transportation 15700 Dayton Avenue North P.O. Box 330310 Sid Morrison Seattle,WA 98133 9710 Secretary of Transportation (206)440-4000 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING =CITY OF RENTON MAR 2 0 1998 DATE: March 13, 1998 RECEIVED TO: Peter Rosen City of Renton, Project Manager 200 Mill Avenue South Renton WA 98055 Subject: SR 900 MP 14.31 CS 1713 Determination of Nonsignificance- May Valley Prezone Phase II 4Kildkui--- 1 File No.LUA-98-009, ECF FROM: Robert A. Josephson, PE, Manager of Planning& Local Coordination Washington State Department of Transportation Northwest Region 15700 Dayton Avenue North, MS 122 P. O. Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 Thank you for giving us the opportunity to review this project, which is bound by Coal Creek Parkway, SE May Valley Road and Renton City Limits. Our response is below: We have reviewed this subject document and have no comments. The Project will have no significant impact on the state highway system. However, we like the opportunity review at time of development. If you have any questions, please contact Don Hurter at 440-4664 or Vickie Erickson at 440-4915 of my Developer Services section VEE:vee File Name CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM Da.e: March 11, 1998 To Owen Dennison From: Jana Huerter/Development Plannin Subject: May Valley Prezone Phase II Project No. LUA-98-009,ECF W just wanted to inform you that the comment and/or appeal periods have ended for the Determination of Non-Significance. Nc appeals were filed. This decision is final and application for the appropriately required permits may proceed. I xurortl CITY OF,RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the '.0 day of -- b , 1997, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing EAR c_ d eewo t 626 outs document:;. This information was sent to: Name Representing Department of Ecology Don Hurter WSDOT KC Wastewater Treatment Division Larry Fisher Washington Department of Fisheries David F. Di tzman Department of Natural Resources Shirley Lul.hang Seattle Public Utilities Duwamish Indian Tribe Rod Malcom Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Joe Jainga Puget Sound Energy (Signature of Sender) 21klakik_ (C . STATE 0=WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that airlf:(1/0. p --yyeti signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the Uges and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: L. y iq �� ( 1P-4'n-GA V1�s Notary Public�d for the State of hington Notary (Print) E My appointment ex MMISSION EXPIRES 6/29/99 Project Name: may t)a..11aji � -cotax. Plna�se a Project Number: LUR 0,009,t✓Z�` NOTARY DOC c: . CITI )F RENTON ea yI \, Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator February 18, 1998 Washington State Department of Eco ogy Environmental Rey iew Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 985)4-7703 Subject: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herev ith is a copy of the Environmental Determination and Environmental Checklist for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee(ERC) on February 17, 1998: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE MAY VA_LEY PREZONE PHASE II/LUA-98-009,ECF The non roject action would assign City of Renton zoning designations to an area of unincorporated King County within Renton's Potential Annexation Area in accordance with RCW Sections 35A.14.330 and 35A.14.340. Proposed zoning is Resident al- 1 dwelling unit/acre(R-1) and Residential-5 dwelling units/acre(R-5). King County R-4 and R-1-P Zones are currently in effect. City zoning would supplant King County zoning at such time as annexation of the subject properties is effective Location: The subject properties are generally bounded by S.E. May Valley Road, Coal Creek Parkway S.E. and the Rent)n corporate boundary. Comments rega ding the environmental determination must-be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM March 9, 1998. Any aggrieved person feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the time of the deterr rination may submit written comments. After review of the comments, if Environmental Review Committee finds there is not suffic ent evidence to amend its original determination, then there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing tc take further action would need to file a formal appeal within the original 15-day timeframe. Written comments must be filed with: Jar a Huerter, Land Use Review Supervisor, City of Renton Development Services Division, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 980 35. If an appeal of the environmental determination is also filed with the Hearing Examiner during the same 15-day comment period, then the Environmental Review Committee will first take action on the request for reconsideration and the appellant will be notified that the appeal is on hold pending the Committee's decision on the reconsideration request. The City will notify the appellant/person requesting reconsideration and parties of record and the Hearing Examiner of the Environmental Review Committee's fine I determination. The appeal process will then be continued unless the appellant notifies the Hearing Examiner in writing that he w shes to withdraw the appeal. Environmental Determination Appeal Process Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM March 9, 1998. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-235-2501. If you have questions, please call me at(425)277-2475. For the Environmental Review Committee, Owen ennison Project Manage' cc: King County Water Pollution Control Division, Metro Larry F isher, Department of Fisheries • David Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources Don Hurter, Department of Transportation Shirley Lukhang, Seattle Public Utilities Duwamish Tribal Office Rod Malcom, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe(Ordinance) Joe Jainga, Puget Sound Energy AGNCYIDAG\ 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 EJ This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Kristina Thompson, being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of the NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL ENVIRONMEENTADETERREVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON,WASHINGTON t h 600 S. Washington Avenue, Kent, Washington 98032 The Environmental Review Committee (ERC)has issued a Determination of Non- MINATION a dailynewspaper published seven 7 times a week. Said newspaper is a legal Siegniaficance for the following project under newspaper of general publication and)is now and has been for more than six months code utnority of the Renton Municipal prior to the date ofpublication, referred to, printed and published in the English language MAY VALLEY PREZONE PHASE II gLUA-sa-oos,ECF continually as a daily newspaper in Kent, King County, Washington. The South County of Renton action would assign City Journal has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the zoning designations to an area State of Washington for KingCounty. of unincorporated King county within 9Renton's Potential Annexation Area in The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the South County accordance with RCW Sections Journal and not in supplemental form) which was regularly distributed to the subscribers 35A.14.330 and 35A.14.340. Proposed ppg y zoning is Residential- 1 dwelling uniVacre during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a (R-1) and Residential - 5 dwelling units/acre(R-5), King County R-4 and R-1- P Zones are currently in effect.City zoning May Valley Prezone Phase II would supplant King County zoning at such time as annexation of the subject proper- ties is effective. Location: The subject pro- as published on: 2/23/98 perties are generally bounded by S.E. May Valley Road,Coal Creek Parkway S.E.and The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of$60.10 the Renton corporate boundary. The 15 day comment and appeal period Legal Number 4269 for this project will run concurrently and end at 5:00 PM on March 9, 1998. Following this, the City will finalize its Determination unless comments received /1-1.a :.N4 /Y-k require a reconsideration. Written com- ments and requests for reconsideration Legal Clerk, South Count Journal shall be forwarded to the Development / - Services Division Land Use Review Supervisor. Information on the project file is Subscribed and sworn before me o is---)� day of J// , 19 r �/ available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington rce98055.e Phone: le in Iv,,/,...et,____. 2550. Appeal procedures are available inthe City Clerk's office, First Floor,Municipal E !� Building. O�4 p:•••NI-4, 1 -- Published in the South County Journal e2. \SStoN FAA • %•tp Notary Public of the State of Washington February 23, 1998.4269 r • 0 7 A R ma: residing in Renton Y c^`r)• King County, Washington 0 WASN\� F NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Ei ivironmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance for the followi ig project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. MAY VALLEY PREZONE PHASE II LUA-98-009,ECF This nonproject action would assign City of Renton zoning designations to an area of unincorporated King County within Renton's Potential Annexation Area in accordance with RCW Sections 35A.14.330 and 35A.14.340. Proposed zoning is Residential - 1 dwelling unit/acre (R-1) and Residential - 5 dwelling units/acre (R-5). King County R-4 and R-1-P Zones are currently in effect. City zoning would supplant King County zoning at such time as annexation of the subject properties is effective. Location: The subject properties are generally bounded by S.E. May Valley Road, Coal Creek Parkway S.E. and the Renton corporate boundary. The 15 day comment and appeal period for this project will run concurrently and end at 5:00 PM on March 9, 1998. Following this, the City will finalize its Determination unless comments received require a rec)nsideration. Written comments and requests for reconsideration shall be forwarded to the Development Services Division Land Use Review Supervisor. Information on the project file is available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. Appeal procedures are available in the City Clerk's office, First Floor, Municipal Buildi ig. Publication Date: February 23, 1998 Acco int No. 51067 dnspub CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE APPLICATION FIUMBER: LUA-98-009,ECF APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT NAM E: May Valley Prezone- Phase II (nonproject action DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The nonproject action would assign City of Renton zoning designations to an area of unincorporated King County within Renton's Potential Annexation Area in accordance with RCW Sections 35A.14.330 and 35A.14.340. P oposed zoning is Residential - 1 dwelling unit/acre (R-1) and Residential - 5 dwelling units/acre (R-5). King County R-4 and R-1-P Zones are currently in effect. City zoning would supplant King County zoning at such time as annexation of the subject properties is effective. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: The subject properties are generally bounded by S.E. May Valley Road, Coal Creek Parkway S.E. and the Renton corporate boundary. LEAD AGENCI City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section This Determina'ion of Non-Significance is issued under WAC 197-11-340. Because other agencies of jurisdiction may be involved,the lei d agency will not act on this proposal for fifteen (15) days. Comments ref arding the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM March 9, 1998. Any aggrieved persu n feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, err°-s of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the time of the Jetermination may submit written comments.After review of the comments, if Environmental Review Committee finds there is of t sufficient evidence to amend its original determination,then there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any pe-son wishing to take further action would need to file a formal appeal within the original 15-day timeframe. Written comments must be filed with: Jana Huerter, Land Use Review Supervisor, City of Renton Development Services Division, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton,WA 98055. If an appeal of the environmental determination is also filed with the Hearing Examiner during the same 15-day comment period,then the Environmental Review Committee will first take action on the request for reconsideration and the appellant will be notified that the appeal is on hold pending the Committee's decision on the reconsideration request. The City will notify the appellant/person requesting reconsideration and parties of record and the Hearing Examiner of the Environmental Review Committee's final determination. The appeal process will then be continued unless the appellant notifies the Hearing Examiner in writing that he wishes to withdraw the appeal. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM March 9, 1998. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required$75.0) application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner E re governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may h e obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-235-2501. PUBLICATIOPI DATE: February 23, 1998 DATE OF DECISION: February 17, 1998 SIGNATURE: 2 1'! 5 Gre g Zlm ermanim i trator DATE Department o Planning/Building/Public Works 77 7 Jim Shepherd, Directory DATE Facilities Department X)-. �� Z Lee, heeler, ie _ DATE Renton Fire Eepartment DNSSIG.DOC NO•110 • ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: MAY VALLEY PREZONE PHASE II PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-e8-009,ECF This nonproject action would assign City o/Renton zoning designations to an area of unincorporated King County within Renton's Potential Annexation Area in accordance with RCW Sections 35A.14.330 end 35A.14.340.Proposed zoning is Residential-1 dwelling unit/acre(R-1)and Residential-5 dwelling unas/acne(R-5). King County R-1 and R-1-P Zones are currently In effect. City zoning would supplant King County zoning at such lime as annexation of the subject properties is effective. Location: The subject properties are generally bounded by S.E.May Valley Road,Coal Creek Parkway S.E.and the Renton corporate boundary. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Comments regarding the environmental determination must be fled in writing on or before 5:00 PM March 9, 1998. My aggrieved person feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure,errors of law or lad,error In judgment,or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the lime of the determination may submit written comments.After review of the comments,if Environmental Review Committee finds there is not sufficient evidence to amend its original determination,then there Will he no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to lake further action would need to file a formal appeal within the original 15-day timeframe. Written comments must be fled with: Jana Huerter,Land Use Review Supervisor,City of Renton Development Services Division,200 Mill Avenue South,Renton,WA 98055. If an appeal of the environmental determination Is also filed with the Hearing Examiner during the same 15-day comment period,then the Environmental Review Committee will first take action on the request for reconsideration and the appellant will be notified that the appeal is on hold pending the Committee's decision on the reconsideration request.The City will notify the appellant/person requesting reconsideration and parties of record and the Hearing Examiner of the Environmental Review Committee's final determination. The appeal process will then be continued unless the appellant notifies the Hearing Examiner in writing that he wishes to withdraw the appeal. Environmental Determination Appeal Process Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed In writing on or before 5:00 PM March 9,1998. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required 575.00 application fee wllh:Hearing Examiner,City o1 Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South,Renton,WA 95055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-e-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be olained from the Renton City Clerk's Office.(425)-235-2501. MAY VAL.ZY PREZONE — 'HASE 11 monad zoning C — ! lIIdMocw.YedJTr1jFL 111 e� t teay Jn C it ua,d a-' 1 aa�r3aua la -e �s:n:ualre�a. n 1rv �) � err' 1� it 1171x tom rrnr-' FOR FURTHER INFORMATION,9 LEAESSE SOIONTACT N AT THE425)I OF RENTON,DEVELOPMENT DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. CERTIFICATION I, Sit 061,v) ('Yl i n n i-h , hereby certify that -g copies of the above document were posted by me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on r=Cbat , • Signed: Sat., ram nit?. ATTEST: Subcribed ajjdAworn before me, a Nortary Public, in and for e State of Washington residing i � m,,, , on the 2 -/ day of /5417 MARILYN KAMCHEFF COMMISSION EXPIRES 6/29/99 STAFF City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works REPORT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE A. BACKGROUND ERC MEETING DATE February 17, 1998 Project Name May Valley Prezone-Phase II(nonproject action) Applicant City of Renton File Number LUA-098-009,ECF Project Manager Owen Dennison Project Description The nonproject action would assign City of Renton zoning designations to an area of unincorporated King County within Renton's Potential Annexation Area in accordance with RCW Sections 35A.14.330 and 35A.14.340. Proposed zoning is Residential - 1 dwelling unit/acre (R-1) and Residential -5 dwelling units/acre (R-5). King County R- 4 and R-1-P Zones are currently in effect. City zoning would supplant King County zoning at such time as annexation of the subject properties is effective. Project Location The subject properties are generally bounded by S.E. May Valley Road, Coal Creek Parkway S.E. and the Renton corporate boundary. (see attached maps) Exist. Bldg. Area gsf N/A Proposed New Bldg. Area gsf N/A Site Area 126 acres Total Building Area gsf N/A RECOMMENDATION Staff Recommend that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Non-Significance. i S. ' a J - --ci.)r \ L___.... M0Y Volley Rd _ 0 0 c_, R-1 26 N O `F. t thRCt1 n t�') LT- r :!r-iiii -L-L-Lui i__42liii, 1. 1 , ai ,� , R-5 .1 I UNII ,� ;F a I MI. gm IIIIIIILtm mill %ISO Ala Project Location Map " T ERCRPT,DOC City of Renton PB/PWDepartment ronmental Review Committee Staff Report MAY VALLEY PREZONE-PHASE II L UA-98-009,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OFFEBRUARY 17,1998 Page2 of 3 B. RECOMMENDATION Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommend that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINATION OF DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED. Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period with Concurrent 14 da A..-.1 Period. X Issue DNS with 15 day Comment Period with Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period Concurrent 14 day Appeal Period. followed by a 14 day Appeal Period. C. MITIGATION MEASURES 1. No mitigation measures proposed for this nonproject action. Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. D. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed development? 1. Earth Imp cts: Impact to earth could occur as a result of development of the subject parcels that may occur under the proposed zoning. Such impacts are not anticipated to increase with the supplanting of existing King County zoning with the proposed zoning designations. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are proposed for this nonproject action. Nexus: 2. Air Impacts: Emissions to air resulting from construction and activities associated with residential land uses may occur as a result of the proposed zoning action. Since the proposal would not increase the potential intensity of development over existing zoning,the potential for such impacts is not anticipated to increase as a result of the proposal. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are proposed for this nonproject action. Nexus: 3. Water Impacts: The zoned development density of specific portions of the subject area would not increase as a result of the proposed zoning action. However, the -P suffix of the King County R-1-P Zone, currently applying to the majority of the subject area, requires that all parcels of 5 acres or more cluster development so that at least 50% of the original lot area is left as an open space tract. Areas left in open space, particularly if forest cover is retained, may contribute to a ERCRPT.DOC City of Renton °BtPWDepartment 'ronmentalReview Committee Staff Report MAY YALLE] PREZONE-PHASE II L UA-98-009,ECF REPORT AND D?CISION OFFEBR UARY 17, 1998 Page3 of 3 higher recharge of surface water into the ground. Since the proposed zoning has no comparable requirement for open space and tl erefore resulting in potentially more impervious or semi-pervious surfaces, implementation of the proposed zoning may -esult in a lower level of surface water infiltration. Mitigation lvleasures: No mitigation measures are proposed. Surface water management requirements currently required of development within the City of Renton should be sufficient, in general, to mitigate potential impacts to surface and ground water. Nexus: 3. Public Services Impacts: Police noted a probable minor impact to public services but stated that the impact on police services would be minimal. Mitigation lvleasures: No mitigation measures are proposed. Nexus: E. CC MMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS The proposal h zs been circulated to City Departmental/Divisional Reviewers for their review. Where applicable,these comments have been incorporated into the text of this eport as Mitigation Measures and/or Notes to Applicant X'. Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. _ Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. Environmental Determination Comment Process Comments regarding the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM March 9, 1998. Any aggrieved person feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the di:;covery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the time of the determination may submit written comments. After review of the comments, if Environmental Review Committee finds there is not sufficient evidence to amend its original d 3termination, then there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action would need to file a formal appeal within the original 15-day timeframe. Written comments must be filed with: Jana Huerter, Land Use Review Supervisor, City of Renton Development Services Division, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. If an appeal of the environmental determination is also filed with the Hearing Examiner during the same 15-day comment period, then the Environrr ental Review Committee will first take action on the request for reconsideration and the appellant will be nctified that the appeal is on hold pending the Committee's decision on the reconsideration request. The City will notify the appellant/person requesting reconsideration and parties of record and the Hearing Examine of the Environmental Review Committee's final determination. The appeal process will then be continued unless the appellant notifies the Hearing Examiner in writing that he wishes to withdraw the appeal. Environmental Determination Appeal Process Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM March 9, 1998. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4- 8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-235-2501. ERCRPT.DOC MAY VAL _liY PREZONE - -)HASE II Figure 1 Proposed Zoning priliair Au III alli a_ 4111111111111111111 'Ito.Y Valley o Rd Inn ... paim...... 1 iiii‘d. R-1 a)h„.■ WI > Q 1 si.....- ■ ■i' NW ill `_nth Ct � 1■■ ■i R-1 l■■■■1 iIi ,■ 11111101131111111 . , WILINV [!I MIPP111111 11111111111111 R-5611111 RIMINFP ■ F*1 i■�usgran •.=�..■■.. ilmiliwo �n,r� tr 'E 10. ' .. P4g1)4TiIw i pa Ortfravtimom��A�0 thu 1 1 EI Ingows mak. vieliverp fa E‘ Omen Nu 1 ,,R,Mil num" mismillilailki 0 Sled I %AM 11.1 1 i N. OIR . r ��ir, .. ar� Uti`tY O�, Planning and Technicd Services_ Ai Illik — All no kr ....a.A. wit '-cia 11111111 mom Subject Area Boundaries � • + Plannina/BuUding/Public Works �it,,`—,` )›. O. Dennison, R. MacOnie INTO 6 June 1997 0 600 1 ,200 1 :7,200 MAY VAL JY PREZONE - 'HASE II Figure 2 Existing Kin County Zonin 0. S c�— SE ma VOII e 75 —. Y Rd 0 liiiimi.ir Q) R-1—P Q 26 i : cr) {NE th Ct 4 ) 11 ' R-4 Itlll 111 2Lt I ' „ ill,� R-4� IIP 41 1 N 23rc << ,E 102nd ......., II 1111141110M . , (- 4411110112 gl ffavt,i4vert #lig44, -‹ '-' nim1641 IP v*. 0 gois is in il , i tt_ univiun fp ' Ataell 1 ? \›.--- ' Illi # owl um ] ,,,-_ *4 411 • SP 4 44 - S E---'-fr t h U� • 04, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning — —— Renton Corporate Boundary :If? Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Planning O. Dennison "l'�N,s 16 January 1998 0 600 1 ,200 :...: 1 :"7,200 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Puoiic Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ,Vt_,C COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 9, 1998 APPLICATION NJ: LUA-98-009,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 22, 1998 APPLICANT: CO y of Renton/Neighborhoods &Strategic PROJECT MANAGER: OWEN DENNISON Planning PROJECT TITLE: May Valley Prezone-Phase II WORK ORDER NO: 78332 LOCATION: Bounded by Coal Creek Parkway, SE May Valley Road and the Renton City Limits SITE AREA: 12ii acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF F'ROPOSAL: This is a non-project action zoning an area outside the City limits. Consistent with the adopted Comprehensive lan land use designations Residential Rural and Residential Single Family, R-1 and R-5 are proposed. Existing King County zon ng is R-1-P and R4. If adopted, Zoning Ordinance will be recorded by King County Auditor and will not be implemented un:it annexation occurs. No annexations have been initiated from this area. A. ENVIRONI VENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Us( Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Hea th Public Services y- Energy/ Historic./Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet i .ru/1 .c.i Zr xt C/ CM LL Ce. •,4,Qh0(C- B. POLICY-!?ELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where ad itional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. / n t: / r-t 15 Lc.-) /C% /1-- Signature f Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 • f's k. Q.,N-to NOTICE OF APPLICATION PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DATE: JANUARY 23,1998 A Master Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Pudic Approvals. PROJECT NUMBER/NAME: LUA-98-009,ECF/MAY VALLEY PREZONE-PHASE II DESCRIPTION: This is a non-project action zoning an area outside the City limits. Consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan,land use designations Residential Rural and Residential Single Family,R-1 and R-5 are proposed.Existing King County zoning is R-1•P and R4. If adopted.Zoning Ordinance will be retorted by King County Auditor and will not be implemented until annexation occurs.No annexations have been Initiated from this area. GENERAL LOCATION: The subject area Is bounded by Coal Creek Parkway,SE May Valley Road and the Renton City Limits STUDIES REOUIRED/OR AVAILABLE: N/A PUBUC APPROVALS: Environmental Review(ECF) Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Owen Dennison,Project Manager,Planning& Technical Services Division,200 Mill Avenue South,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on March 9.1991. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail,contact Mr.Dennison at(425)277-2475. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION DATE OF APPLICATION: JANUARY 22,1998 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPUCATION: JANUARY 23,1998 DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: JANUARY 23,1998 MAY VAL..Y PREZONE — 'HASE II Pr pOrr rzonina 1 Lir \ . j r ,_`vwr as J` 1 ,�� qv— I I I :iiii I I/ � u5' ! a a I. •- ;gA�`n5? I � r r M GENA4l0t.pdG �ti[+�f"� r ? �-7� H CERTIFICATION I, SAi'v,k) YYIlrlh'Ai , hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document were posted by me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on JOtinl,tan) 2— lciciS • Signed: 5i, i MVI''✓tt h ATTEST: Subcribed pnd worn before me, a Nortary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing in ,on the Afo-1' day of e If*o' • MARILYN KAMCHEFF COMMISSION EXPIRES 6/29/99 City or Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIROVMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: '' SI"� ce j W vtw-COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 9, 1998 APPLICATION N): LUA-98-009,ECF"" DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 22, 1998 CITY OF RENTON APPLICANT: Cit r of Renton/Neighborhoods & Strategic PROJECT MANAGER: OWEN DENNISON ,trrm,fcn Planning PROJECT TITLE May Valley Prezone- Phase II WORK ORDER NO: 78332 JAN 2 6 1998 LOCATION: Bot.nded by Coal Creek Parkway, SE May Valley Road and the Renton City Limits r3.7ttLv1116...4 Of•,IUN SITE AREA: 12E acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF F ROPOSAL: This is a non-project action zoning an area outside the City limits. Consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan land use designations Residential Rural and Residential Single Family, R-1 and R-5 are proposed. Existing King County zoning is R-1-P and R4. If adopted, Zoning Ordinance will be recorded by King County Auditor and will not be implemented unt I annexation occurs. No annexations have been initiated from this area. A. ENVIRON? ENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Heal h Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-Fi ELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS U c) <, vvi Alt+vt • We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Puouc Works ENVIROVMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEf'ARTMENT:IWASeorl111CV% COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 9, 1998 APPLICATION N): LUA-98-009,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 22, 1998 APPLICANT: Cit/of Renton/Neighborhoods &Strategic PROJECT MANAGER: OWEN DENNISON 'rry OF RENTONI Planning PROJECT TITLE May Valley Prezone- Phase II WORK ORDER NO: 78332 JAN 2 6 1898 LOCATION: Boi.nded by Coal Creek Parkway, SE May Valley Road and the Renton City Limits �UILE�IIVIa DIVISION SITE AREA: 12E acres BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF F ROPOSAL: This is a non-project action zoning an area outside the City limits. Consistent with the adopted Comprehensive['Ian land use designations Residential Rural and Residential Single Family, R-1 and R-5 are proposed. Existing King County zonl ig is R-1-P and R4. If adopted, Zoning Ordinance will be recorded by King County Auditor and will not be implemented unt I annexation occurs. No annexations have been initiated from this area. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Heal'h Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-F ELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS vv c M Wit vL1\. We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. /� P ,r (4 /.11 I/Z6o %[ S Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 cNT�N FIRE nEP NTIUN RURFAU T City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/f Uoi,c Works g n AI ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW2 I��gT REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: V 44 );'f t+t a-.-4►ti COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 9, 1998' / V 6D APPLICATION N J: LUA-98-009,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 22, 1998 APPLICANT: Cit/of Renton/Neighborhoods & Strategic PROJECT MANAGER: OWEN DENNISON Planning PROJECT TITLE May Valley Prezone- Phase II WORK ORDER NO: 78332 LOCATION: Bat nded by Coal Creek Parkway, SE May Valley Road and the Renton City Limits SITE AREA: 12E acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF F ROPOSAL: This is a non-project action zoning an area outside the City limits. Consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan land use designations Residential Rural and Residential Single Family, R-1 and R-5 are proposed. Existing King County zon rig is R-1-P and R4. If adopted, Zoning Ordinance will be recorded by King County Auditor and will not be implemented unt I annexation occurs. No annexations have been initiated from this area. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Heal h Public Services Energy/ Historic./Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet .1 ,A /00 16ior- 10uc 5 • I B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS A.,4 C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS /t L f We have reviewe i t is application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional inf rmation is needed to pro•i ,assess this proposal. (' t1� 6 . , , / i2 � �lS Signature of Dir tor or Authorized Representative / Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Pump Works ENVIROVMENTAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: PIaV‘ ReVICW—14RUCOMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 9, 1998 APPLICATION N): LUA-98-009,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 22, 1998 crV Or Ct'[�oN APPLICANT: Cit/of Renton/Neighborhoods &Strategic PROJECT MANAGER: OWEN DENN f-r"' Planning ,anI PROJECT TITLE May Valley Prezone-Phase II WORK ORDER NO: 78332 � � LOCATION: Boi nded by Coal Creek Parkway, SE May Valley Road and the Renton City Limits SITE AREA: 12E acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF F ROPOSAL: This is a non-project action zoning an area outside the City limits. Consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan land use designations Residential Rural and Residential Single Family, R-1 and R-5 are proposed. Existing King County zon ng is R-1-P and R4. If adopted, Zoning Ordinance will be recorded by King County Auditor and will not be implemented unt I annexation occurs. No annexations have been initiated from this area. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation _ Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Heai'h Public Services Energy/ HistoriciCultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-F ELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RI"LATED COMMENTS ivV CDiVlk14ekt1, We have reviewE d this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional,nformation is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Puouc Works ENVIRONMENTAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DE'ARTMENT: 'A L , COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 9, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-009,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 22, 1998 APPLICANT: Ci'y of Renton/Neighborhoods & Strategic PROJECT MANAGER: OWEN DENNISON Planning PROJECT TITLE: May Valley Prezone- Phase II WORK ORDER NO: 78332 LOCATION: Bounded by Coal Creek Parkway, SE May Valley Road and the Renton City Limits SITE AREA: 121 i acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: This is a non-project action zoning an area outside the City limits. Consistent with the adopted Comprehensive 'lan land use designations Residential Rural and Residential Single Family, R-1 and R-5 are proposed. Existing King County zon ng is R-1-P and R4. If adopted, Zoning Ordinance will be recorded by King County Auditor and will not be implemented un'it annexation occurs. No annexations have been initiated from this area. A. ENVIRONI MENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Us( Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Hea th Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet 76) B. POLICY-I?ELATED COMMENTS e --ifz__761iz)cela-60-/ -7267td )46.2c /5/-25--Pe;61/ %D il2c '/ :- c-ey-y, C. CODE-RI=LATED COMMENTS 094 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additi nal information is needed to y assess this proposal. /d3/� ignature of Director or Authorized Representative Dafe DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 City .., ,2enton Department of Planning/Building/I ; Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:CovlS-tttchavl se nGer COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 9, 1998 APPLICATION r 0: LUA-98-009,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 22, 1998 APPLICANT: Ciry of Renton/Neighborhoods & Strategic PROJECT MANAGER: OWEN DENNISON�ITy .. I ON Planning � (;FItirn PROJECT TITLE:: May Valley Prezone- Phase II WORK ORDER NO: 78332 AN 2 6 1998 LOCATION: Bo anded by Coal Creek Parkway, SE May Valley Road and the Renton City Limits ,v,i`ViI/ DiviSIOIV SITE AREA: 123 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF I'ROPOSAL: This is a non-project action zoning an area outside the City limits. Consistent with the adopted Comprehensive °Ian land use designations Residential Rural and Residential Single Family, R-1 and R-5 are proposed. Existing King County zor ing is R-1-P and R4. If adopted, Zoning Ordinance will be recorded by King County Auditor and will not be implemented un it annexation occurs. No annexations have been initiated from this area. A. ENVIRONIAENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics • Water Light/Glare • Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Usr Utilities • Animals Transportation • Environmental Hea th Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources _ _ Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-F ELATED COMMENTS Aki4L C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS icv4-", We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where a ditional it formation is needed to properly assess this proposal. 464 /�� gnature of Directoruo ed Representative' Date DEVAPP.DOC / Rev 10/93 Washington State Northwest Region Oa Department of Transportation 15700 Dayton Avenue North P.O. Box 330310 Sid Morrison Seattle,WA 98133-9710 Secretary of Transportation (206)440-4000 t�E� ECONOMICRECE�pEVELOPMENT, FEB 0 6 1998 NGHBOOS AND STR TE ICHPLANNING DATE: February 2, 1998 TO: Ritter ir City of Renton, Project Manager 200 Mill Avenue South Renton WA 98055 Subject: SR 900 MP 14.31 CS 1713 Notice of Application-May Valley Prezone Phase II 0 11 File No.LUA-98-009, ECF \ PAVIA151 ) FROM: Robert A. Josephson, PE, Manager of Planning&Local Coordination Washington State Department of Transportation • Northwest Region 15700 Dayton Avenue North, MS 122 P. O. Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 Thank you for giving us the opportunity to review this project, which is bound by Coal Creek Parkway, SE May Valley Road and Renton City Limits. Our response is below: We have reviewed this subject document and have no comments. The Project will have no significant impact on the state highway system. If you have any questions,please contact Don Hurter at 440-4664 or Vickie Erickson at 440-4915 of my Developer Services section VEE:vee File Name I Ul'VY 0 J VTO� NOTICE OF APPLICATION PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DATE: JANUARY 23,1998 A Master Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NUMBER/NAME: LUA-98-009,ECF/MAY VALLEY PREZONE-PHASE II DESCRIPTION: This is a non-project action zoning an area outside the City limits. Consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan,land use designations Residential Rural and Residential Single Family,R-1 and R-5 are proposed. Existing King County zoning is R-1-P and Rd.If adopted.Zoning Ordinance will be recorded by King County Auditor and will not be implemented until annexation occurs.No annexations have been initiated from this area. GENERAL LOCATION: The subject area is bounded by Coal Creek Parkway,SE May Valley Road and the Renton City Limits STUDIES REQUIRED/OR AVAILABLE: N/A PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review(ECF) Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Owen Dennison,Project Manager,Planning& Technical Services Division,200 Mill Avenue South,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on March 9.1998. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail,contact Mr.Dennison at(425)277.2475. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION DATE OF APPLICATION: JANUARY 22,1998 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: JANUARY 23,1998 DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: JANUARY 23,1998 MAY VAL ZY PREZONEu� — 'HASE II Pro F.ea•TANo ml� l .a iiu noaa`tea ia9leeu��u. � � .411;;i a nueruna ♦ �IIE 81 ��yq��U�3 =J r n u:ec wn/�sM��,n �a anuF Ayn�•e00 e�.i �t►q o ,E,gefa�i��ifo 1..df 'i4.aIM GEN/MLOT.00C a 1113E CERTIFICATION I, Saocti1,) n1 Ylhi ,i , hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document were posted by me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on Jailli r9 Signed: A 1�'A"Vti h A'ITE ST: Subcribed 9,nd worn before me, a Nortary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing in , on the �.(v7`' day of9 1y'�' , • MARILYN KAMCHEFF COMMISSION EXPIRES 6/29/99 DEVELOPMENT SER'V C S ►IVISIO;EN l� A `TER AP"PLICATI ON OWNERS) PROJECT INFORMATION'(cant) Note If there is more thanon legal o vney .t attach:an additional notarized EXISTING LAND USE(S): Master application to each owner NAME: Various Single family residential,hobby farm,vacant ADDRESS: PROPOSED LAND USE(S): City: ZIP No land uses specifically proposed-nonproject action TELEPHONE NUMBER: ........................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................... ............................................................................................................................................ CONTACT PERSONIAPPI�TCANT:: EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: NAME: Owen Dennison Residential Rural(RR) Planning and Technical Services Residential Single Family(Rs,) ADDRESS: 200 Mill Ave. S. PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: No change proposed city,: Renton ZIP: 98055 EXISTING ZONING: TELEPHONE NUMBER: 277-2475 R-1 (King County) R-4 (King County) ................................... .................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................... ......................................................................................................................................... PROJECT INFORMATION PROPOSED ZONING:(implemented upon annexation) R-1 PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: R-5 May Valley Prezone-Phase II SITE AREA(SQ.FT.OR ACREAGE): 126 acres PROJECT VALUE: PROPERTY/PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION: N/A,nonproject action Subject area is bounded by Coal Creek Parkway, S.E. May IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? Valley Road and the Renton corporate boundary Site is adjacent to an area within the city limits designated KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER: APA Zone 2 IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF See attached ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA? City of Renton Critical Area Inventory Maps indicate the presence of wetlands,floodplain and erosion and landslide RECEIVED „AN 2 2.1998 OEVELUa�0,1NRI PLANNING CITY OF !NTON Document5\OD # LEGAL UESCRII ON Off'PROPERTY A►.ttach se` Aa 4te sheet if needed See attached legal description of areas proposed for R-1 and R-5 Zones. Check ali application types that apply-=City staffwlll determine fees. ANNEXATION $ SUBDIVISION (_PREZONE $ SPECIAL PERMIT $ _LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ _TEMPORARY PERMIT $ SHORT PLAT $ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ _TENTATIVE PLAT $ _SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ _PRELIMINARY PLAT $ GRADE&FILL PERMIT $ _FINAL PLAT $ (No. Cu.Yds: ) VARIANCE $ (from Section: _ _ ) $ PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT $ _WAIVER $ _PRELIMINARY _ROUTINE VEGETATION _FINAL MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ _BINDING STl"h PLAN MOBILE HOME PARKS $ SHORELINE REVIEWS: _SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ CONDITIONAL USE $ VARIANCE $ EXEMPTION $ NO CHARGE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ _REVISION AFFIDAVIT` CIF` OrNERSHIp I,(Print Name) ,declare that I am(please check one) _the owner of the property involved in this application, the authorized representative to act for the property owner(please attach proof of authorization),and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Qwt J . (fir nSN 1 Sor\i (Name of Owner/R tative) Notary Public in and for the State of Washington ! i(n Notary(Print) (Signature wner/Representative) My appointment expires: S SECTION r0 BE CC)MPLETED BY.CITY STAFF ;:`::':::: ::>::»: City File Nuntoer: £V> SA R : SHPL CU. LLA PP FP TP SP RYMP ;�I::":: TOTAL FEES 5 TOTAL POSTAGE PROVIDED Document5\OD MAY VALLEY PREZONE-PHASE II AREA A—R-1 ZONING LEGAL DESCRIPTION: That portion of Government Lot 1 of Section 3, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., King County,Washington, lying westerly of Stonegate, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 177, Pages 62 through 68, inclusive, Records of King County,Washington; TOGETHER WITH all of Government Lot 2 of Section 3, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., King County,Washington;and TOGETHER WITH that portion of Government Lot 3 of Section 3, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., King County, Washington, lying northeasterly of the County Road (New Castle Road, Duvall Ave. NE, 138th Ave SE, Renton-Newcastle Rd. Rev.), LESS the southerly 135 feet thereof, as measured along the east line of said Government Lot 3; and TOGETHER WITH that portion of the South half(1/2) of Section 34, Township 24 North, Range 5 East, W.M., King County, Washington, lying southerly of SE May Valley Road (SE Coalfield Way, Thos. Rowse Rd, May Creek Rd.) and easterly of Coal Creek Parkway SE (Newcastle Rd. Rev., 136th Ave. SE). MAY VALLEY PREZ ONE-PHASE II AREA B--R-5 ZONING LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Those portions of Government Lot 3, the Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter and the Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 3, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., King County, Washington, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the northeast corner of the plat of Newcastle Terrace, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 87 of Plats, Page 30, Records of King County, Washington, said northeast corner also being the northeast corner of the Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of said section; Thence southerly along the easterly line of said subdivision and along the easterly line of said plat, to the southeast corner of said plat, said southeast corner also being a point on the south line of the North half(1/2) of the North half(1/2)of said Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter; Thence westerly along the southerly line of said subdivision and said plat, said southerly line also following the existing City Limits of Renton as annexed by Ordinance No. 3972, and continuing westerly along the southerly line of the North half(1/2)of the North half(1/2)of the Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of said section and said City Limits of Renton,to an intersection with the easterly right-of-way margin of the County Road(New Castle Road, Duvall Ave.NE, 138th Ave. SE); \\TS SERVER\SYS2\COMMON\DIVISION.S\P-TS\PLANNING\ANNEX\PREZONE\PH2LGLZN.DOC Thence northerly along said easterly right-of-way margin, to an intersection with a line 135 feet northerly of the south line of Government Lot 3 of said section, said 135 feet being measured along the least line of said subdivision; Thence easterly along said line,to an intersection with the east line of said subdivision; Thence southerly along said east line, a distance of 135 feet,to the southeast corner of said subdivision, said southeast corner also being the northwest corner of the Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of said section, and said southeast corner also being a point on the north line of said Newcastle Terrace plat; Thence easterly along the north line of said plat and said Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter, to the northeast corner of said plat and said subdivision, and the point of beginning. MAY VALLEY PREZONE-PHASE II AREA C --R-1 ZONING LEGAL DESCRIPTION: That portion of the East three quarters (3/4) of Government Lot 3 of Section 3, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., King County, Washington, lying Southwesterly of the County Road (New Castle Road, 138th Ave SE, Duvall Ave.NE, Coal Creek Parkway SE). \\TS SERVER\SYS2\COMMON\DIVISION.S\P-TS\PLANNING\ANNEX\PREZONE\PH2LGLZN.DOC PH2LIST <::::<:;<:::>I it :»:<:<:::«<::: <::<<:::<:: ::::TAXPf Y5Ri:: i# ME: :::>;:>:: ::::<>« 3424059C 48 ANDREWS JOHN P 3424059072 PARHANIEMI FREDERICK R 0323059(73 ANDREWS MARL S 34240591 17 PARHANIEMI FREDERICK R 6061400C 80 BAILEY LEE S 0323059005 PRISSINOTTI 6061400C 90 BAILEY LEES 0323059126 ROBISON MATTHEW M 6061400100 BAILEY LEES 3424059076 RUGGLES JR 0323059;47 BLAYDEN ROBERT E & SHIRLEY 6061400170 SAUTTER DONALD 0323059C38 BONWELL JAMES L+JULIE P 3424059051 SIMMONS INGEBORG 6061400;50 BOSS TYRE G 6061400270 SIMPSON DONALD M 0323059C 02 BROUSSARD C H SR 6061400350 SPIRY WILLIAM H JR 0323059(71 BROUSSARD C H SR 3424059019 STABBERT DAN W 6061400: 10 BROUSSARD CLIFFORD 3424059063 STABBERT DAN W+CHERYL A 6061400K 00 BROUSSARD CLIFFORD H 6061400010 STEVENS ROLAND 0323059;48 BROUSSARD CLIFFORD H JR 6061400060 STEVENS T L 3424059C 47 BROUSSARD CLIFFORD H JR _ 03230591 16 SZABROWICZ RICHARD N+RITA 6061400;90 BROUSSARD CLIFFORD H SR 3424059050 TABACEK AUGUST R+CAROL 6061400140 BURDULIS ROY A 0323059095 VADNEY ALLEN J 6061400150 BURDULIS ROY A 0323059138 VADNEY ALLEN J 6061400C 70 CALL R STEPHEN+DONNA C 6061400030 WARE EDWARD L JR 6061400;80 CANTELLAY WANDA L 6061400040 WARE EDWARD L JR 6061400C 30 CARPENTER ALEC 3424059108 WARNER JEFFREY WEST+ 6061400:40 CARTER BETTY LOU 0323059127 WININGER ROBERT C 3424059106 CHAFFEY CORPORATION 0323059137 YBARRA TYE 0323059112 COOK RICHARD S+LOUANNA R 3424059110 ZIMMERMAN L A 0323059C 19 CULBERTSON BILL A 34240591 13 ZIMMERMAN LE ROY 6061400;20 CURTIN JOHN L 3424059104 ZIMMERMAN LEROY A 6061400;30 CURTIN JOHN L & TRUDY M 0323059;45 DAVIS JAMES E+LORRAINE M 0323059;46 DO QUANG T+PHUNG CHUNG 0323059C 69 DUFFUS A 3424059109 FABRE ALFRED R+PAMELA J 0323059102 FISHER ROBERT A & VIRGINIA 0323059111 FISHER ROBERT A & VIRGINIA 3424059C 99 FOGLEMAN FAMILY TRUST 0323059136 FOSTER J A 3424059116 GAMBINI HAROLD JR 3424059C 58 GAMBINI JR HAROLD 6061400:20 GOODE KAREN G+NORMAN R 6061400' 10 HAYES RANDALL 6061400;00 HAYES RANDALL K 6061400130 HUHN DANIEL W 6061400;40 HUNTER ALONZO JR 3424059C 77 MAKOWSKI F G 3424059( 16 MALIN JAMES B+SUSAN G 0323059164 MCASKILL JOSEPH 0323059(52 MCDOWELL JAMES HARVEY 3424059C 26 MERREL JOHN & RENEE 0323059108 MERRITT MICHAEL M+CYNTHIA L 6061400160 MIODUSZEWSKI VINCENT L+ 6061400120 NETT KATHLEEN R & LOREN J 6061400180 NOLAND DENNIS E 3424059C 86 OEHRLING MONTE V 6061400110 ONEIL PHYLLIS V Page 1 PROJECT SUMMARY MAY VALLEY PREZONE - PHASE II The proposed action would assign City of Renton zoning designations to an area outside the existing city limits. The subject area is bounded by Coal Creek Parkway on the west, S.E. May Valley Road on the north and the Renton corporate boundary on the east and south. A combination of R-1 and R-5 zoning has been recommended by the Planning and Development Committee. (see attached Planning and Development Committee Recommendations Map) The zoning recommendation has necessitated an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. Environmental review of the Land Use Map changes has occurred separately. The proposed zoning ordinance will not be implemented until annexation occurs. No annexations have been initiated from this area. May Creek flows through the subject area. Additionally, the area is mapped for a variety of critical areas in the City's Critical Area Inventory, including landslide and erosion hazards, wetlands and floodplain. The area has been subject to flooding and erosion problems which appear to have increased over time. As a result, the draft May Creek Basin Action Plan, developed with the participation of City staff, includes a recommendation to maintain zoned densities at the existing level for areas that drain to May Valley. This recommendation would apply to all of Phase II. The proposed zoning is consistent with this recommendation. The majority of the area is zoned R-1-P by King County. The -P suffix requires that parcels five acres or more maintain half of the original lot area in open space. The maximum density of one unit per acre would be maintained under the proposed zoning. Those portions of the affected area that are currently zoned R-4 would be zoned R-1 and R-5 under the City's proposal. Since the County calculates density on gross area and the City applies density to net area, R-4 and R-5 would allow a similar number of units. Therefore, under the proposed zoning, the total number of new units would be marginally reduced from that possible under existing zoning. PROPDESC.DOC\ MAY VALT JY PREZOXE - - HASE II Figure 1 Proposed Zoning ECD Ma ci- y �alleY Rd 0 ___ m is i,,,i r R- 1 i 0 up 26tn� t •- 0 -Nil "NI E1b 5th Ct ' , R-1 ( Ill l t111 ^�,, R-5 II I � 3 ��Iil�� 1 � m � `pumwo magraffemi 0°- w qE 10 '. n d 1 1111111111P1 k 41101/ommit . 11 W .. 191111111411 11 tivt4TIF# :Mat < 113 iI'i twtkivivris,01211 r-c-jc our ►� J - "151P4 1 �r'��s► o: �-8-z.t h _�.. ice' •i��r..si _ ..m. G~1' O4, Planning and Technicd Services Subject Area Boundaries + + Planning/Bulding/PubNc Works "1 O. Dennison, R. MacOnie -Pt�,N,ru 6 June rm 0 600 1 ,200 1 :7,200 MAY VAL- -71Y PREZONE - HASE II Figure 2 Existing King County Zoning SE May fall e — r3 y Rd II U a) R-1—P Q cn 26 : , ci 'NE • I'nth Ct ' R-4.21th 1 IIIII L 1 i it I 1 -�R-4I ir II3 � n 23rc r � , I � _ � ►E 102nd IIIIIIMPII 41111/amilli74 NIP V ci, 1'!tJ ♦ vek ' eir%1 ' .1. *‘ 4 -_,s IILIL�I m 1VAiri ka 'M1 ,wor. '-r. -- - mow , .iwArril wa w- — WEN= wri /►eft Ii.- r- al in I MI - ' Pk Itta ilimik- . •44.%.,.. b -_ U 1'1. o� Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning —— Renton Corporate Boundary ♦ Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Planning cN'te16 o. January Demison 1998 0 600 1 ,200 1 :7,200 • MAY VAI EY PREZONE - 'HASE II Figure 3 King County Mapped Critical Areas 11, >, o ,_ _ r� II b ro•Zr ire., •r= hem=� cS" .\-'&!:Z:_11.!...t.11.7.- _. IPProp.... _ _ .. -_11,1111 NII -. 141104 -iliqw, 1 -lair .. , , '7.'""----""-;i6-o. ,. 4111 I CD(-) )1 le Op th Ct magpie, . entawrir NAsorgiiirr P )3ra tun ■mini1 E 10!nd inwi ��I ma►� owoo r ► V I!i UUI!I $1UIIpipHhuW * �� i, — ?d1' t' IJI$liø' �. �I 10- ►O I Mil assivoi nystrhop VOW 1111 ip 1 IN 'iiiikk, eiaaI ri 11111111111 mom ift 41 I Al ** P�� cm pPJ siimmt ...%A! bli _ Gti�Y 0,6 Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning Boundary of Prezone Area `t:.FR Landslide Hazard � * Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Flaming ...-. •. "` O. Dennison ��N2' 16 January 1998 • _• Wetland 0 600 1 ,200 1— —I Floodplain High Erosion Hazard 1 :7,200 CITY OFRENTON. DEVELOPMENT SERVICESDIVISIOx .... ! �T x�r� �`t PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: The State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW,requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement(EIS)must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal(and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done)and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant,requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly,with the most precise information known,or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully,to the best of your knowledge. In most cases,you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer,or if a question does not apply to your proposal,write"do not know"or"does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline,and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems,the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal,even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals,even though questions may be answered"does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions(actions involving decisions on policies,plans and programs),the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant,"and"property or site" should be read as"proposal," "proposer,"and"affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: May Valley Prezone-Phase II(Nonproject action) 2. Name of Applicant: City of Renton 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Staff Contact: Owen Dennison, (425) 277-2475 Economic Development, Neighborhoods &Planning Address: 200 Mill Avenue S. Renton,WA 98055 4. Date checklist prepared: January 7, 1998 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton,Planning/Building/Public Works Dept. 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): A zoning ordinance can be adopted by the City Council following environmental review of the proposal. Implementation of the proposed zoning would not occur until annexation of the subject properties. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected to this project? ❑ Yes ® No. If yes, explain. Zoning adopted through this ordinance would not be implemented until annexation occurs. No annexation has been initiated to date. City of Renton Environmental Chec._._. .....y Valley Prezone-Phase ll January 7, 1998 Page 2 of 13 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Draft EIS for the City of Renton Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan,January 16, 1992. Final EIS for the City of Renton Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan,February 1, 1993 Supplemental EIS for the Comprehensive Plan,December 1994 May Creek Current and Future Conditions Report, 1995 Environmental Checklist for the 1997 City of Renton Comprehensive Plan amendments (LUA- 126,ECF) 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? D Yes ® No. If yes, explain. Development applications occurring prior to annexation would be processed by King County. 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Proposal will require adoption of a zoning ordinance by the City Council. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. The proposal is to prezone an area of unincorporated King County within Renton's Potential Annexation Area in accordance with RCW Sections 35A.14.330 and 35A.14.340. The subject area is designated Residential Rural (RR) and Residential Single Family (RS) in the Comprehensive Plan. Proposed zones are Residential- 1 du/ac (R-1)and Residential-5 du/ac, consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. (Figure 1) King County zoning for the area includes Residential- 1 Unit per Acre(R-1-P) and Residential-4 Units per Acre(R-4). (Figure 2) Environmental impacts from the imposition of City zoning are taken to be those that result from the difference in development potential between proposed zoning and the existing King County Zoning. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section,township, and range if know. If a proposal would occur over a range of area,provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan,vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency,you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The subject properties are generally bounded by S.E.May Valley Road, Coal Creek Parkway S.E., and the Renton corporate boundary. (figure 1) B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site: ❑ flat D rolling ® hilly • steep slopes D mountainous ❑ other b. What is the steepest slope on the site(approximate percent slope?) Over 40% \\TS_SERVER\SYSZCOMMON\DIVISION.SIRTS\PLANNING ANNEX\PREZONE\ENVCH ST.DOC City of Renton Environmental Checklist M_, -'alley Prezone-Phase 11 January 7, 1998 Page 3 of 13 c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand,gravel,peat,muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Alderwood gravelly, sandy loam and Everett gravelly,sandy loam. (U.S.Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, 1972) d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. Portions of the subject area are mapped for erosion hazard and landslide hazards in the King County Sensitive Area Map Folio, 1990. e. Describe the purpose,type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. NA. This is a nonproject action. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction,or use? If so,generally describe. NA. This is a nonproject action. Erosion could occur as a result of development allowed under the proposed zoning. However, since potential development densities would be maintained or slightly reduced if and when the proposed zoning supplants existing King County zoning,the erosion potential is not anticipated to increase as a result of the proposed zoning action. g About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? NA. This is a nonproject action. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth,if any: Since erosion impacts could occur as a result of site specific project proposals, such impacts should be assessed and mitigations proposed through the application process. Additionally, development occurring in the City must conform to the City's environmental regulations including, but not limited to,Land Clearing and Tree Cutting and Clearing and Grading Ordinances. 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e.,dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any,generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Emissions would be those associated with the construction and activities of residential neighborhoods and may include dust,wood smoke and automobile exhaust. Since the proposal would not increase the potential intensity of development of the subject area over existing zoning,the potential for such impacts are not anticipated to increase as a result of the proposal. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal? ❑ Yes ® No. If so,generally describe. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: None proposed. 3. WATER 11:\DIVISION.S\P-TS\PLANNING\ANNEX\PREZONE\ENVCHLST.DOC City of Renton Environmental Chec._._. .....y Valley Prezone-Phase ll January 7, 1998 Page 4 of 13 a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site(including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes,ponds,wetlands)? Z Yes ❑ No. If yes,describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. May Creek and a portion of a Class 1 wetland. May Creek drains to Lake Washington. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet)the described waters? ❑ Yes ® No. As a nonproject action,the proposal would allow,but not require, development within 200 feet of the wetland and May Creek. If yes,please describe and attach available plans. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. NA. This is a nonproject action. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. NA. This is a nonproject action. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year flood plain? ® Yes ❑ No. • If so,note location on the site plan. This is a nonproject action. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? ❑ Yes ® No. This is a nonproject action. If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. b. Ground Water: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. NA. This is a nonproject action. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any(for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system,the number of such systems,the number of houses to be served(if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. NA. This is a nonproject action. However,the majority of the area is proposed for R-1 zoning which may not be of sufficient density to make sanitary sewers economically feasible. Therefore, implementation of the proposed zoning may result in additional discharge of domestic sewage into the ground. The amount of potential discharge would be comparable under existing zoning. US_SERVER\SYSZCOMMON\DIVISION.SW-TS\PLANNING\ANNEXTREZONBENVCHLST.DOC City of Renton Environmental Checklist .....f Valley Prezone-Phase II January 7, 1998 Page 5 of 13 c. Water Runoff(including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff(including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters, If so, describe. This is a nonproject action and therefore the method of collection and disposal and the quantities of run-off associated with the implementation of the proposed zoning are unknown. It is possible that the amount of run-off could increase for those areas proposed for R-1. For the majority of the subject area,the R-1 Zone would supplant the County's existing R-1-P Zone which requires that all parcels of 5 acres or more cluster development so that at least 50% of the original lot area is left as an open space tract. Although the overall density of R-1 . is the same as R-1-P, areas left in open space,particularly if it remains forested,will allow more surface water to recharge into the ground. However,the portion of the R-1 that is proposed to supplant existing R-4 Zoning with annexation may lower the run-off from that area. 2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so,generally describe. Residential development of the subject area may create the potential for substances, including but not limited to pesticides, herbicides and fertilizers to enter surface waters and sewage from septic systems to enter ground waters. However, potential impacts are not anticipated to increase under the proposed zoning. a. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface,ground,and runoff water impacts, if any: No measures proposed. 4. PLANTS a. Check types of vegetation found on the site: ® deciduous tree: alder,maple,aspen, other ® evergreen tree:fir,cedar,pine,other • shrubs ® grass pasture ❑ crop or grain ® wet soil plants:cattail,buttercup,bullrush, skunk cabbage, other ® water plants:water lily,eel grass,milfoil, other ❑ other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? NA. This is a nonproject action. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known at this time. d. Proposed landscaping,use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: NA. This is a nonproject action. 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site,or are known to be on or near the site: (see next page) Birds:hawk,heron, eagle, songbirds, other H:1DI VISION.SAP-TS\PLANNING\ANNEX\PREZONE\ENVCHLST.DOC City of Renton Environmental Checl_._. may Valley Prezone-Phase II January 7, 1998 Page 6 of 13 Mammals: deer,bear, elk,beaver, other muskrat,bobcat,coyote Fish: bass, salmon,trout,herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Great blue herons which have been designated a "monitor" species by the Washington, Department of Wildlife has been observed within the subject area. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so,explain The entire State of Washington is included within a migration route for birds known as the Pacific Flyway. This flyway, as it overlies Renton,is used by a variety of migratory birds, including, but not limited to,the Canada goose. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: No measures proposed. 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy(electric,natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar)will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating,manufacturing, etc. NA. This is a nonproject action. The proposed zoning would allow medium and low density residential development. Residential uses may consume one or more types of energy, including electric, natural gas, oil,wood stoves, or solar. The type and quantity of energy consumed is not anticipated to increase if and when the proposed zoning supplants existing zoning. •b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so,generally describe. NA. This is a nonproject action. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: NA. This is a nonproject action. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards,including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste,that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. The proposed zoning would not change the allowed uses in the subject area from those allowed under existing zoning. Hence, environmental health hazards are not anticipated to change. Under either zoning, environmental health hazards would be those generally associated with residential uses. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Not applicable to a nonproject action. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: No measures proposed. H:1DI VISION.SAP-TS\PLANNINGANNEXTREZONE\ENVCHLST.DOC City of Renton Environmental Checks, N (alley Prezone-Phase ll January 7, 1998 Page 7 of 13 b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project(for example:traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None known. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis(for example:traffic,construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. This is a nonproject action. Development that could occur under the proposed zoning would have noise impacts attendant to residential uses. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: No measures proposed. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Existing uses on the subject properties include single family residential and hobby farms. Portions of the area are currently undeveloped. The City has acquired on 10 acre parcel for future development as a park. Lands adjacent to the south are currently developed as single family. Land uses adjacent to the north, east and west are vacant and single family. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? ® Yes ❑ No. If yes, describe. Certain properties within the prezone boundaries are currently used for hobby farms. c. Describe any structures on the site. Single family homes and accessory structures. d. Will any structures be demolished? ❑ Yes ® No.If so,what? e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? King County zoning on the subject area includes R-1-P and R-4. The-P suffix requires that development on parcels over 5 acres retain at least 50% of the site in open space. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? King County: Urban Residential 1-8 Units per Acre City of Renton: Residential Rural and Residential Single Family g. If applicable,what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? According to the State's definition of shoreline, no shorelines lie within the proposed prezone boundaries. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an"environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. The King County Sensitive Area Map Folio, 1990,maps landslide and erosion hazards, wetlands and floodplain within the subject area. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? NA. This is a nonproject action. \\TS SERVER\SYS2\COMMON\DIVISION.S\P-TS\PLANNING\ANNEX\PREZONE\ENVCHLST.DOC City of Renton Environmental Ch of ,.lay Valley Prezone-Phase!t January 7, 1998 Page 8of13 j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? NA. This is a nonproject action. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: No measures proposed. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Proposed zoning designations are consistent with Renton's Comprehensive Plan and are comparable to existing King County zoning. The proposal is also consistent with the recommendations of the draft May Creek Basin Action Plan which encourages maintenance or reduction of the existing zoned densities for areas that drain to May Valley. The subject area drains to May Valley. 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. This is a nonproject action. Housing units would not be created or eliminated by the • proposal. A portion of the area currently zoned R-4 is proposed for R-5 zoning. The remainder of the area currently zoned R-4 and all subject areas zoned R-1-P are proposed for R-1 zoning. Since the City's R-5 Zone, based on net area, and the County's R-4 Zone, based on gross area, are roughly equivalent,total potential new housing units would not change significantly. b. Approximately how many units, if any,would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. NA. See B.9.a. above. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: No measures proposed. 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s),not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s)proposed. This is a nonproject action. Maximum building height in the R-1 and R-5 Zones is thirty feet (30'). b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? NA. This is a nonproject action. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: NA. This is a nonproject action. H:\DI VISION.SAP-TS\PLANNING\ANNEXIPREZONE\ENVCHLST.DOC City of Renton Environmental Chec,v,sr .....f Valley Prezone-Phase II January 7, 1998 Page 9 of 13 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce?NA. This is a nonproject action. What time of day would it mainly occur?NA. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views?NA. This is a nonproject action. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal?NA. This is a nonproject d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: This is a nonproject action. 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Apart from the parcel within the prezone area planned for future park development,there are several recreational opportunities within one-half mile of the subject area. These include the May Creek Greenway, Sierra Heights Park and the Cougar Mountain Regional Wildlife Park. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? ❑ Yes ® No. If so, describe. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: No measures proposed. 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for,national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so,generally describe. None known. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None known. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: No measures proposed. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. May Valley Road S.E. and Coal Creek Parkway bound the subject area on the north and west. Several properties currently take access off Orcas Ave.N.E. (148th Ave. S.E.)via the Stonegate subdivision to the east of the subject area. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Public transit routes currently pass the subject area on Coal Creek Parkway. H:\DI VISION.S\P-TS\PLANNING\ANNEX\PREZONE\ENVCHLST.DOC City of Renton Environmental Chec y Valley Prezone-Phase II January 7, 1998 Page 10 of 13 c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? NA. This is a nonproject action. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so,generally describe(indicate whether public or private? NA. This is a nonproject action. e. Will the project use(or occur in the immediate vicinity of)water, rail,or air transportation? If so, generally describe. This is a nonproject action. The subject area is not in the immediate vicinity of water, rail or air transportation facilities. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. NA. This is a nonproject action. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: No measures proposed. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection,police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so,generally describe. The potential density of residential development is not anticipated to increase with the implementation of the proposed zoning. Therefore,the need for public services is not anticipated to increase. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. No measures proposed. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity,natural gas,water, refuse service,telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. Unknown. There are existing homes in the subject area. It is assumed that at least minimal utility services are currently available in the affected area. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project,the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. NA. This is a nonproject action. C. SIGNATURE I,the undersigned,state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: ,..._ • Name Printed: p w t N tD t✓^ry nl sor., Date: I /2 i J i$ H:\DIVISION.S\P-TS\PLANNING ANNEXPREZONBENVCHLST.DOC City of Renton Environmental Checklist M., _alley Prezone-Phase Il January 7, 1998 Page 11 of 13 D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEETS FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (These sheets should only be used for actions involving decisions on policies,plans and programs. You do not need to fill out these sheets for project actions.) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air;production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances;or production of noise? New residential development may increase impervious surfaces with attendant increases in run- off, increase emissions to air and noise through additional traffic generation and other residential activities, and involve the low-level storage of toxic substances typically associated with households. However, the proposal is not anticipated to increase the potential for these impacts over the existing regulations as the proposed zoning would allow uses similar to those allowed under current King County zoning. Total potential new units are estimated to be equivalent or lower under the proposed zoning than under existing zoning. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: No specific measures are proposed. However, specific development proposals made to the City following annexation of any portion of the affected area would be subject the City's other regulations as well as the standards in the Zoning Code. These regulations govern, among other things, surface water management, aquifer protection, noise level and septic systems. 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals,fish, or marine life? Any additional development of this area may result in a reduction of wildlife habitat and potential degradation of existing habitat due to increased surface water run-off. Since the existing County R-1-P requires that subdivision of parcels five acres or greater maintain at least 50% of the original lot area in open space, current zoning may maintain more land in natural habitat than would proposed zoning. Further, preserving natural open space may provide greater opportunity for surface waters to infiltrate, reducing surface water entry to May Creek. Reducing discharge to May Creek may lessen the potential for degradation of the creek habitat. However, since the development densities allowed under the proposed zoning are comparable to or lower than existing zoning,total impacts are not anticipated to be significant. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals,fish, or marine life are: Measures that may reduce impacts to plants and animals include implementation of land clearing and tree cutting regulations, wetland regulations and surface water management regulations. \\TS SERVER\SYS2\COMMON\DIVISION.S\P-TS\PLANNING\ANNEX\PREZONE\ENVCHLST.DOC City of Renton Environmental Checl ..._, Valley Prezone-Phase ll January 7, 1998 Page 12 of 13 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Any additional residential development may increase the depletion of energy and natural resources. However, the proposed zoning would allow an equivalent or fewer number of potential units than would existing zoning. Therefore, the potential for depletion of energy or natural resources should not increase as a result of this nonproject action. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: No measures are proposed. 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study)for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands,floodplains, or prime farmlands? The subject area includes wetlands, floodplains and a fish-bearing stream. In general, the nonproject proposal would not directly affect environmentally sensitive and other protected areas. These areas will be more affected by the replacement, with annexation, of the County's sensitive area regulations with the City's. However, supplanting the existing R-1-P zoning with the City's R-1 would remove the requirement for maintaining over 50% of the area of parcels over 5 acres in permanent open space. This may result in greater surface water run-off to May Creek. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: The proposal is consistent with the recommendations of the draft May Creek Basin Action Plan with are intended to minimize impacts to the hydrology and habitat of May Creek and environs. Development that may occur under the proposed zoning, should all or portions of the subject area annex to the City of Renton, would be subject to the City's critical areas and surface water management regulations. 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? The type and intensity of land uses would not change significantly with implementation of the proposed zoning. The proposed R-1 and R-5 Zones are consistent with the Renton Comprehensive Plan land use designations and with existing King County zoning designations in terms of the type and intensity of potential development. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: No measures are proposed. 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Any additional development that may occur as a result of the proposed action may increase demands on transportation and public services and utilities. However,the type and intensity of development allowed under the proposal is comparable to that allowed under existing zoning. UTS_S ER V E RIS YSZC0MMONIDI VI S ION.SIP-TSIPLANNINGIANNEMPREZONEIEN VCHLST.DOC City of Renton Environmental Checkli., l.._, Palley Prezone-Phase II January 7, 1998 Page 13 of 13 Therefore, potential development under the proposed zoning is not likely to significantly increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities over potential development under the existing zoning framework. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: No mitigation measures are proposed, since potential demand is not anticipated to increase under the proposed zoning. 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment: No conflicts with local, state or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment are known. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: Name Printed: 0'(Jt 1\i v . )EN N ; So.v Date: \\TS SERVER\SYS2\COMMON\DIVISION.S\P-TS\PLANNING\ANNEX\PREZONE\ENVCHLST.DOC