The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA98-064 CUDI /•//'/I. -I '412 12 2IESPOOOLE 2,..• 1 • • . I BELLOAS.AA 111.15 423-.•3-10.11 • 21412•86 I • 0.12 I• I - • iiii, L....O.0.0...52 OE AMO.11 ,. / •I l . , il. ,....... . 41: .A..........,..2.• • ,/, 24 &I , ---''''''''--.2.1.0.•CAW. a \ , V \ CONS—q.....:-Cy,/ i,'!,1 /4 Y..'/2":* \ ;/X;,'' , , • FRALEY/SMUCKER • \ •ARCHITECTS• , IN OM.12.0•1010110.8.0112 \ \ TM 11.1.10)FM 70.291•21S 1.40.2C.• RYAS: ...,r....a,E M.. Ii.tf: • Vt.•2,ti.M.i 1, f2 i'..—•a....A...A— \ g i .., : r7, g 4,:/—...4........ ! ; • / — ,..„,......,-/—A AR. 92•41.AA& /' 2, ,I , '. , ) .,.,,.. r.x•v.A.2..• .....1 /\ 7 ' /''"•--/ '.. / .' = / / < / • .'' N,\.../ ',..•... / N/' --___ 4 7IV1 ,,, ---- ____---0=- , ---‘_-_. ----,- - - _._./___ "'N :=.— f ',. .."--.77. --=----.. "----- —--—-- l'''''''' •••• C4NDI::4-i ...„,_ E '3- AV./......C... .r I I • IIk• Ma,-.4,214. i„Roy. RMON...."-PER''', . AN.•-6.2 O••••••-PO 1.• \ : ....____L T Dr„sz ic ,•••••••E',WAGS O.DAMN. IS,MOO. I r—los A,RNA i'; • 's-I. L______i ' i •e 44 u.4o3ee, .SV... EARL'NG-CN //,•••••••01,722/AA." '.I I%7.1/' : 111111—,mwr: , - .,..........01-1 I 1 I Cry..f227'%=ME. 2t,i.'- MIMIMIL? i- . • 4.---41---...._.....,... riiiiiii4.,. mere.in.tIl•cer• Le:,ADO22.512, 1 ../....02.0.2.1....---, „ • i •••-.Ow C.uhr. .1g'' .1 IIMI.I111.1.4°. AllOVB NS•Ai 4.0e I v•-or twa--•\ \ I r--•.''''rv•On'.7. 1 ,-1 -%'k--I OA......ACV..NZ A2 REN-Dh J.A ta¢55. i. tit yi.t.CAL. I , \ , -43.2--2:--2-1 :'2.7.,.....-. .Zarigiti M.A..22.0•12.2,20.SU. INee•nn.e \ ' ' I b TOrs"en: A . 13,5....••••••••., SU... ENLARGED RITE.1-41••• I radmmayer yr ...- AND'MIER NMI•............. a m-. i ,'Itf, OA.. COMO PAO ,,,..... CPC AAO SU. ELEvATIONS , .......22021.41.••..... I ' woo.,veer.ald....I. 1112.11..WIN* 1 .M.NO. i I OINCM "NOON, a.oNem ,.._...:_.• Al (I' I , IR.,WAI... I SCALE RE'••-6. ': IOW - IAA% REST'OAR ELEVATOR SCALE VW•,-0. f ,E1.11..GED SITE PLAY • ' -I ,a.Cl/2's•ssnUG LEGEND I I OF 60'4.. VI3 c19C:SE•00..`o Y. • - RORER ONC UK(O caWEFE) t THOU z/la/Se o roWEP(u Tnin)P0.E I ION po',o I __• SW 7TH STREET p e w. P°OLEOLE,°i„ 0.0. J�°� Lot LOt 6 _ ea 1 0'— nwHc 0)toxi•NEA0) CDT. rD,RdMDLN•ADetaC" Q. RIEPNONE MANHOLE •D• • 2/lei ez— uwrtEA cii•N our F . PD QI I: LDy• a c•.a 9•vH V) -E.•ST TEL FED II"aLl Pam- a•IaFP UNE� yy EviST LIGHT SOS TL• SO' WARP VALVE Ev,CF9p I W t _POUM ELE'..•1 i ] Q tQ(p O EWE NVTReANT L •'E` >'I ,,,3 Gx" LDS UI f• ° C.A.WATER IM.RTENCS ,,,,AD xe CONC WC. I .LI I W •_ ]�i§�}$,j Ex�S HL 90I ElLv.np. r'•NTL•SLINK•N CASE. I�JJ-xOp1111-20 / Z DOWN 05'2/TE/9• QI E•J 4R 9ENCnN•ax w' E_`4dLA TREE LEGEND EVISRNG 2,Ft MOLD.. r_ouHo H.�L:uPreE•N UJ q` •x�COHC NOH• GSE 0 OEOOUOUS TARE LL.AIMP (n aq o0"M 00 2/08/9e S0909'2,E { uRv .` iyp� d•NCRP(�N7 DS-DCOWWS.L^ „AST CU?o N , • 5 )) 25 of' 14-5_' P.O Los DINT + A 'N•Loa°•" \Nx•��\\� •EVE NPB Cli ` 1062 ■ EVEPpRM.PEE CN.CNCP:, Q. ��9_ a2 S cusp EMST fEAG POE A 95 2 Or.000.'L•5 0. (ROTLi.T P051 ]'dA 40•CMx 2 `NflGR♦AGL R NEASUREo n PP.15 OCR GROUND ttFv.,f 9 siaO ^ ". EVO.EVERGREEN A0..252 A 55509'J•'E / ' �{.J{.vrJ. f250.' _ HOR RN MAP lK5•PE HOi i0 00PAS IREE EA•Si SSMN . • ,�i TPUNR dAMCTERS WERE APPROXIMATED AT �,,y TM.]'i0.ABOVE O.dIT.O LEVEL 1RE5 LESS li r 1 lz`_2� y SURVEY POINT 1062 € �. _ - •x e'NOT LOCATED 062EAGER,.s sNOPN r_ Lc ",�\ .Si.I 60 SURVEY POINT 1062 1 II y� � 0TLA BOUNDARY 1. 00 "•°TIME .022SS v-N idroTwE T22�r]2ee•W 1 L Exi ENSEMENi L•xOnTAE a>Ze'T901•N r TIME 4T]Te22"W EEV•21T E.T;:Da, LOt r 1 S , 11REE OATH: ,,,,, .; SITE INFORMATION AEI 3E 10-0c 1EaI I }ygy'�E .' '... .^ -0-. �clanrRl�rFL T "' IM I R.CCPEz<•• R T50•w.wNS14.010. [3•:-1FFF!•4I' WE=C"r•_ SCOn o•TRaSON illF:fib1F�FID r M NONE (205)62a-1.100 • 014,141FZIWAF1 I s 1 •o C /, I Y LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 5 EARLMGTOS a4U5T0AL PARR NO I.AD.:POING TO THE I I O'T TNEPE0r RECGRCED IN VOLUME 03.PAGE'0.RECORDS .H N.G COTO.wASONGTON. I '__ M NO'4•0 NS 4'L•'t IN DODSTY 0r CMG.STAR OE WASN,NG"ON I _ nE'LEL•T.SUas`"NOtt000MP N•OORRDDER No iesiu-`s'•MERic." I VICINITY MAP '•NRC'°THE SE+'_• I AN.REcoAcfc _ NOT TO SCALE �VRp•D P•OxK T_. CN_ 1 D ND UT,,'-•FEFNCE GRAPHIC SCALE D5.00. I cc NDy,3935t ?V•CE CAUTION! _�roNfv.w• .�N o5 •ITCO unUTIES EXIST IN THE AREA CfO:Orr L'=EWE., TON / AW UTEJTV KORMAnp.SWORN RAT I.Mx. n I- uu uwvuTrizourz CONTACT .A.E ONE- LP SIV 0 x•E•xAeE•H 1 800-424 555nd 9CNOR.ARR 0 / • e•SE'S OO CONmOL vdNr•H•aOLO' .[.CPK Max iH CASE SEi BAR i CAP"0C�COvmOI" oOwR OS'.LODArzD• REURENCES: ��M, cZet�O�SREE1 -'_ _ ' ELEv.2 9e Q<SExEc:PAVE Sw-OE-SACWOMB IN - - - _ rj I ' i, ELEv. 2 e2 0.NP mnn, I i — ..9.N. ..SOH RAP N.. ..� VMS PLAN DOES NOT REPRESENT A BCu.DART SURVEY REVISIONS �` ) DCI GTE —-_-f _ _ _ X DATE EESCRIPTTO• E' , . D NCANSON COMPANY,INC. JMCG �- p.• Ate_ •_,24.02.11`. •. SITE PLAN — ""r T I /23/90 " WA0366-EARLINGTON SCALE. Y�50• dEAwx:JED�D•R 2/2]/98 •' RYERSON SITE �__ 'Tom' a/-Py19 PRo1cT 96180.200 e`�1 EXISTING SITE SURVEY I FOUND In•BRASS PLUG LEGEND I toF staff �M +a�oown°o i. - PO X url"EiE(OWUXCl•m I I PtONL SSo I SW 7TH STREET - PONE.ai 4:Norwr - �a`rNG e'�, `Ot A LOS 6 I. —_ -— a 0 uonT.acnu.n..E .0— GAS LNE • • _, GAS vuTc pro E3 'CCwD'-'OLS•ea9aE+P OSS— SERE•L••E...HOLE PLT.uDyn °W :/+e/9e SEWER aF•n OUT > a CATCH BASN V) -ENV TEL RED F JOL'0 QI 1 LOS• W— SUO.eN ro y ExrSi UW r Pn5• re cos•c.^e e I W' c "1rIXN0 ELE',-'s ao' / aTER UPC w+rEn VALVE •�`. .° > . • AGL-z)J 15 al / •l01 P u HYDRANT E Y'x0 x.tout CNON ASE Q OT S- lD W IN • CHu•P L w RNCE f w'n�'L A X L, /TAPE JO�b / gef9..3.13.111 En5nN0 SPOT EIAVArrOu DPw 0 e'.2:ra/90. Z VT RENON/A•N al W U nrosT NOT. Vf ``'a EOr1nNO TREE LEGEND Bv.LDNC EouxO NG !SrecE ru OE0WOVS KEG I W ¢ x••caNc wN rN c•sE :.-D - 01 W7.$• ♦ DON••:`2na/9a Se9n9J'f 2S OT ` +2 u-utt. le CURe 'L lore SURV ^'RED \•NINN dAKTE.(rN1 ;yd0u0u1 E.�LnxG / 2 •DRO•• DrxG OINT j-� Dn.DArt 1062 11I -j iT EA,OKEN TNEE cx-Orpr.T \ \\\\ \\rE.' cure ca lit '¢¢¢.\...j��,- °`i i o�-o�awi•s nR C ��,,,`qqq�� ,b �♦uCURB �CUST RAG TOLE RXI L� vPo19 ��T �,, s'd•POCx 2 'r a\xflCxi•Q to KASNREO I-EE°Cx ! 5a9pg J+'L ♦A.36 3_ r } u°2 NNE Mt UREs+.E mar r0 SCALE ME Eu y 1 iR`^• TES Or hi S•L90.5.EiE.E.cE mtM•IOC+Mu Wlr �` V EXISTSsw ,,,y - _•Y ./�- tMnN.d•KTE.S RAC••.•O"NN•r(0•• I Y SURVEY POINT 1062 w 0 Jxs ra A•eos a 10 ucl nEEs uss '� AN e'.•oT Lourto ExtE.T As SNO.N I S°Y -• i a° SURVEY POINT 1062 I I J9' 0� BOUNDARY MAP COORDN•TE OA•• SCALE: t'" 200' LAWTAE •TM'•e.JTN NAo ET DIST rs'u^L" LADDAE UZe'r9 ON I E+EE9Ex+ ONONJOE r22,3'2922w I ? �`y ELEv.n r cx15i EDEr- --s-- , Y - AANAL* -\ vOt ^ N TR ATA s Nsw• �p SITE INFORMATION —il „-E[r,�E 1 OUo)01!0.I I ♦ YTE ACCN s••- 5.'OM smEE• 3 2 3 I F H . vTE:M• "• ® PNOUE (3M.)62♦_3]00 _ •JS.00S•E I I E.rsnvG lr R•E^Sd•9uM1ONG I I. LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOr!.E+NNGT00 NDusmiAL PARR NO r CPDING TO NE I z -- PL,TN coven RECORDED .21 uK eJ.e:GEE+O.RECORDS 'OR x0'SxOw. _ XI 0E N COUNT'OR.NO.STATE OF w•SNNG•CN I - REGAL D UDNNC(C s REa riff RN ORL Br nR1•AKRrCAN •vTEc•o NNE SEA- •LE xwR.NCE caVP.x,ORDER No Ja9xu-2 I VICINITY MAP I NOT TO SCALE - '.NTED'D vACrnE'E.- Cx_ I - _ __�COT•e AN•eFC-.__ _- ^0•"D unl...s-vr-E- GRAPHIC SCALE _ Nrae♦C -- J5J9JS9 ° •E•••w A•==VAN CAUTION! E^ECD.CCD VxCE=+=x aa0•ee) LO•AOJ BLNED unuees EDS,N DE ARCA ._ __ r.«N.so n / AND uNxT NraRV+naN show DAY NOT OE CONNATE CONTACT THE ONE- '"' . 9TE 6EnCNN•APR or HMR. NOMSLvm♦w*0 CONlrRUCDW DUNo Nat:XRreE N 1-800-42 4-5555 - -I- JO / i BASE'S x CONm0.PONT...OW CONC.1.A.CASE „Tnr Da E €T "—"�� NH. SET e•R e'C.-od CONTROL' Pow o s'.LOCATED+r 5CLC.. NE CENTER OE M-DC-SAC ��N�T y' :- SW tOS= i I............."...."... A CI MAR iEx E�ieiE s. vM NAM VIIINNATAN nn1 Nw ODES NOT REPRESENT A edNOART SURNCY f REvISIONS ',,o,,: • 1 DCI GTE �� • yTE OESCRIviIUA 9r • oEyN` INC. IMCG SITE PLAN — "" ,� "" WA0366-EARLINGTON SCALE. t'.So' "�;' oR•w'AD 1DATE 2/23/9e ' RYERSON SITE N3' < PROJECT.95160.200 OF EXISTING SITE SURVEY LEGEND MUM 1/2'IT.SS RUC I I S of sta)P NRON°°"°w .a «°o K. I PORE.UUNEE(OPE E'.0) PL�'NR1�, b' 3/TR/M R. POWER(UTL1M1)POLE C , I I �a`1NOP eNo�30 Oz9 is l _- SW 7TH STREET v_ OJT T°°`.OLEAL OR API.. JO `O cc,. _, L. OT— PELF L.l..OLE.01 F✓DRP• E/5 "Cr°UMC LS.l69R• CAP OSs— X4R L°"DPK••.NNOLE IP" 3/16/9E SE9ER CLEAN OUT (n -E.isT TEL a0 °a=I 1 Lea s:„-- ESNo.�x pn.91N. EXIST OW eC9' R I 'ER U"D EPSS•C,PSp I W 1 -,POJV1D ELE9.•9 T I 60 x.Rxv4v[dE9' O wxE xroR.xr =N'N0:..^CC.MOO `> cL.31 S LOT' lD5' W ( ° w.rzM•x lMrrzUT( 11.NA•L•SW.m CASE Q b / Z • SSr4]SI H ENSnNG SPOT E Evnw 130.05' 396/961 9rz 9ENCPu.eN UI ErwSr 9w. l/) ii `a ERVING TREE LEGEND - `W.; 9U:Lo»w :_OUxp�x.KLwtV5 at0:s[ oEaOuaus mEE N'g oCTS:.. 3ne/96 SAINT)) .0, u_ R i:g r.PE� \muw aANErzR(iNJ"°�o z •'Lryx a:RR y SURV 05'...mw. .NO �� ' °' OINT 'A' EVERGPE[N CAFE OCN"0. 1 t N\\\\\\\\\\\.L.' E�xe<,i qZ� `. 1062 Sy{ C �p`F , I) �E.s POE Ensl Uwr°05r -•)! 2r. 5'd.NOG.3 I' '.=i K'�K�wi.0.:r wE.SUFED xE.°01K C�nn d0uN0 fUT DUST ,� - 0.-36 2 Y E..EKROREEN SE9093,'E h NOTE TRCC ORs VMS ARE R TO SCALE. ME �� —sue, • T3l.01' li S59•ROL9•oTOE"R 1(A'•LOW".Oxl. 1.E.:9i Syx. I I vj3' '�= _ 3.5'd.KrEx9 WERE..LEPL RE.r 1 SURVEY POINT 1062 , 0. i� TM.s rs..ROE waw E9EL REEs LESS _� . •Nor LOCATED E.CCPT As sNowN y� "i" °0 SURVEY POINT 1062 �� 0� BOUNDARY MAP caoRax.E°... _ SCALE: 1'= 200' x•Tvro es L1uDE .ize'1R.9rN w•drwE .zn0'lx e6•w • I 1 NA0 33 E.KT 15 UnL•'- L xTwE .sZ6'T9.OT•N ___Itj E.XxE r y LwaJOE in9'zsiz'w FosT.DDEE" Q r \'Y EIEv.3r. It ^ A rR ATA: 1 ,.. SITE INFORMATION Ci' f�[iillQl;E}f1 I s.rz•CC°ESS 600 sr•06.ST�IEET R°F�[i{F1FIlEF21 R[Nrw.T,tPNO Tw I • • -� ®lZLf 6...6 / L.oe rr a rz_^N._ SCOrt e•i2P5w • C.iiGfe_Tai: Rll 1„, 3 FyFI 9E. '` AO E,:SnxG e.E �, TON A LpmG I W LEGAL DESCRIPTION I ' LOT 5 E.L.GTON=DUSTM.L PAR[NO . T . TAD I Y PLAc rNEREOF REGORGE D•vOLUPE 63.RAGE AGE.O.O.RECORDS OF.Nc COMM...TON i _ v 0.NO,5••OxA-;R ve 9-1,7-N COUNTY OF.0 STATE OE wAWNVON 1 N9L'•e OE,L.-- i _ • LIktL OE "'C'S PER nTLE TrT 6.nRST AN'''''" - -•Nrzr ro THE su- NwR.Ntt caP.N.GUI No 969zu z I VICINITY MAP •N aECPCEO NOT TO SCALE -•NTw e •euCNE I •5.5 -_= Rc..N0 UR s.R_E GRAPHIC SCALE 95.s6• I Y9n 0 A.UM;-' (99.CE >• a'R[�rw.,tR...:N CAU TI ON! ._ .Ee°ECO+CEO VMEe a= 60•Nl - _ T0.•0! 6UnEo UDUTES EXIST N 111E AKA - --— T:n<A-so n _ TO CCOMIIRUCT. .MD U1111Tv 9EORNAxw SCORN N.v 'C'0T NE.LL V1R1CO.LOCATE SE RETE CONTACT MCC•NRRLxN OF Of Nows " 97 6ENCM,AP. 1 8DD-424-5555 FOUND NAL•SCRME M - I - 90 / i RASE'S 00 CONTROL PANT-N.ROLD' . CONC ht.A CASE - - _ xf1'3'363 _ _ ' SEEv6.R_6 CAP;DO CONTROL"90 nDO.[w"C[°1.KRLOEACUDi-OE-sAC REFERENCES: _„_- SN t0��SRE`- _!vim aEu:Eueic SW o. TRIS PLAN 00ES 901 REPRESENT•60R.DARr 9U6.26 _ REVISIONS 6" G —- — • DATE DESCRIPTION 9v. DCI i_ fr D RECANSON COMPANY,INC. IMCG •.~ .—". WA0366-EARLINGTON SITE PLAN ,�.I "" .a+5 ' R SCALE. 1-=so' �R 0....ED IDArz 2/23/9 RYERSON SITE l ' ,•.rw .0.1ECT-96160-200 T OF EXISTING SITE SURVEY I iffE4—- , / / 2.S.WE••/..U..CUM"Y4 90SES 1.* ' / / 45-61E-Ell• 40.1.Its"RESPONSE,"..C. SIM ER RE,EArSE I DAM 1 : sC. _N-- ' /TAN-F.9NA ,:':'NI.'• - . ' i\.... ...- • . •A' .,..... _ —, . , . -.'....'N'--...rrt•••7•141.0 4 '‘• //.r„ i 6.1 , coN5-k....f...c' 5E' ''''''/;////'•.•/4'/".,//22,'' .., . 0 \ ////' ,, / / -, :/'*../..., FRALEY/STRKKER \ .ARCHITECTS, E2 WE IIVERMI EOSUIVAED. • \ \., TM 21612.01,MX INEE-111% 1.10.,E,• Si3e5: 1 , ) ' - \••) i' .. r E••"I...ROCK ; ; ,./......./77.- ,......................--',Ex,P111rs.VE t '''' Ex..•••• ‘>(,•; ,'-- • , . ' VEND NPR '—......,......„0/ . ... , ,' , .../ / , . /. . ' .„,„„ egx.,,v....{... •,....1 ' ' •/ • .' PEAK. N•jr• .---N __________.„_. '' •_..r .__\... _±' ././ r A.....-s- rer-_--- . ...• ----.. -....-- ,. ....:.:„.,-.._ ; i EirE NAPE I re-.47 aea Y-11•E ECU,ENT , —. ..:,...- ---- 4...... 1 .,........- \; i,-............,. -..„,.'• , SSE.EVREPOLE 1 ' SE, yr 8..... , R.E.E5ON,...FER., F417-74'4.7.2':."-=4,77. --7:7,--771 1.1,11...•,PR. T re, I VT,,,,•••••6 1 I i• , : ,_ .... I , ....i.• IC _--MEE V.L.SS C.EMS= ,,—2•6,A,L....41 i • ‘,.. i 1 : . ,.,s, c,, •,,,,,,.• LiA03676 -- ,. --., , a . __.,.... EARL'N,Cs—CK:r-Ein EGFATENT SEC AS .9'..1.r. ' ' Ini- ew. ...- SPELL'PCNO•OLE /i r TRANYNINEN eArr.- 1 I•'E T' 11.1411L1 ' ' 's- 41 --.--_'' —— , •NrEsE1.•.1.A.C.I. it '.lit, 1,411•...4"..- 1111111:, '. MG,'SEE•••. ISE"ROORESE 60e 5,4,•(Zn 6,,IME- 4,14. ' /!,--•-EY.016..C,0•O•1 I 4,_..L•;,___.j ...-E -,_//! -.A•LNCE.M1REE 1 i yr,.72 EAMEED ''..I ' 6..1..."Ed-WC.now,.••.A.-2 I \ 's ,- ii/ \ % / i f,-.6:0;r:2 ---1. & . -67 --76=7---6.6. 111.11--1141 3-,-, --v •••• 5.0. •-4. VERT OJECUIRE,TN,S ME..1.: ErS EC1.0,E, ME X I SNEE'TIRE , gall111 ..i•MMI.M11•1=16,.. N., ,...KAM immi jaim. - 11MEIZS=ME CPC.WC,SEE A: • • "-,1-, .I, ' TRAMEONEN od1,1,4 COAK I IEELNLLNDE.AV,.....-RGE:'.fUETION::Te''LANII I "..•DOLVED POSE ISSWIS.,101._y_____----1. ......4 Al 6.-onamil IRO,WY. SCALE VS'•,-0. I,: WEA SCALE 1,11.•$...0. 1 I ENLARGE:,SI1E PLAN MEV'DYER ELEvAlIC•4 I '/// ei7i3 //,/ Eua,10.4.VE+E.aErz x �[7� iEVIc ana 40'E"E Ra S,DL•Y'� "' I .' y., AFC•dw• i.ECiIC..�R6 I " DATE! Er •• ..dn•ew —�- CV i 4-. _n Ex._,.De. cI 111 \ ,'. C�6 e„c cti 6E- • •ARCHITECTS= 1 \ \ If.ws.WE 16.66-26 WIO,EC'• 91365: a;�cc E?E- { Y ) ,s I \e ,ex De e.c— 6.. $ e yi .x,n.e "�s;e:d .E la►Q <— fie,e wv.e xm— \ 1�.•c.oeEc Rarc ...-- VMS.'ear.. G_� y�+eR - R`ERSCN RR.,PER'Y IJEW.W1 Wt. 1 T°;,,o WEE ev C.S.W. IS,•E...<EM r—an.w,evu .; .L`-I• �7��1 I II -.� D.a.N-Wte•Eu.•' UG0366 / —eTe eaW ...e!!.: e' 14�� _"_�� ,•�� e°EE dam` ! EARL'NG CN �/Ir. �cTwo�ua ass.x IVEMENT$0,4 WI, c' ' --.I r�r av,ew.'..'C.' Ie,,e mDRae 1 e•wa., ., w .L I I'� e.c � 602 5w'06n STREET !•-e--\-—. revc A nweE __I ■`- n c _e MI< REN'T 4.4 Sm2SS �" Imo__ ' - eme.'Ifs I I \ \ �� ,`2R.•"uwee,Ta aEE a.eE•.�•L! �I I x / a:! ,. •-, ewEiy.-Ex ENLARGE:SITE CLAN _ 1.��► .-• a.-m. AND TO ER °MpSCWB GO.-.o xl.: ELEVATICNS mn»r. 1 aeme� " I-Cl IweE-•.eeew .seem 4,1 ' IR.,S MAN. PLAN •I'-V I I PEST TOIER ELF'/.Tigi SCALE. Vm• I EN-dRfl rot RTEr r LEGEND .we.n-Mass nw _ _0_ t Of Stare` 4 aN tC i•oo«elle COW —� aK:L.101q•O) 0� •o x/,./9s a•POLE a•.00 EPaLrN�i''Po.o ota to I —_ SW 7TH STREET -- —sa . u L naw..[ JOL �� 407. _1 —Or— ,..a(U[IOv[M•OI • !OAOW.C•. N i tIM'MI. —SS— SE .ua.0.[ •M' 0 Y.[.CIE.OW �'� r0: O Grd.•sr E.,Sr rtL F o I..:�' —• W07070 �r9 : Y nrMaxr ar'•[• > .2r1 " LOa' Lis -ft w r[.KrE.•.-o:..-cant.a9 QIIFax a•...r.fE.a 1°'F' p 7sTo:sLt E.sa.c 907 E,avna j•-,•sna[9 C.C. 10 yv i Z Dow 05'.2,./9. QI N 9rt SC..Ann z i `�"r�"' S TREE LEGEND ' If \ IaJ su.L0..c •. me w.r.c•Y !� xoouous,.[[ VI.1 oo..:,.a/,9/9s s.9w s•T xs o, ,v.[ Mix M...tt. E.y,,,G \ as cV.,e `�, �SURV \,w P•K rt.(..1 os.awmw+5 l 1062 I m.o.oE9.. 1 ',\\\\\\\\\\\ can co \ aNT EK�a`E"�"` oao.. [nS� t Ay <U• a2.]tS 1. \.•E'p.••CL.KNURO.•.... iawau R[v 1 --., S'a•MC. - [K.[K.a.EE. n�s,�y I I y vw�y s �r -/i �a o..wK aw.ro.aKc a[Es.[ss {••c I �^ y SURVEY POINT 1062 r A I •+E'.or[a•rto nay.•s 9nw . �:.. I ya7- -.�T• E0 SURVEY POINT 1062 ;+c:' I i �� "' 0� BOUNDARY MAP <oG.o...a o... 1 I I ' SCALE: 1•. 200' "� •aT',aar.. iow7,m[ ,xnaxxw•. nc[ •rn'nan. L097,.CC Sx,a x[22, ` 1-."vnMr itGs\- Lot SITE INFORMATION • , $ 9rt•MMS!E• wo s.•o,.,inn-ET yy�l9( • .[nnP....sn.wron S t J'• SOn w.o., •- ASI Srt x�l.wo Y.W:f C 3. I J,7/7I,4I4/M/W/VIV/7/I ",,,,,4�Y,L77/I7/77/7/44,,,,,,,,,,,,I,,,I V •nsd.nO..O I 1 3 LEGAL DESCRIPTION �'LL LO,a.E•.LMC,O.IACUS,MM P.F...•CCC.M.O ro.t i Ps,11E.E0.ECO0CE0 9.OLU•(63...0,O.OECOns _ Cv.:SO COWR......7d -•' .n . . •+>.pr 9.0 ry,K 91•,E w IMr,'a.•Kn CO STAR OF.•9.•w•d _ «C•L a ..7, rs .E. glowglowsca. .a 7,11E a,r a• . MC9C•n n_E 39479.CE mr•n•000(0 no 3s9:•3-x VICINITY MAP •,K_anto_, NOT TO SCALE .l9•9••C•,E•tS'C. CC...0E5t•... I a9 Y•'.0•no UR'••,f.,Ac+. GRAPHIC SCALE w»,9ac •n ry•.Q uR,•..r..nu . .. • »»ax CAUTION! .!•.00510 L•C•, 9M•Ns .r..M n _....... w M'�• U.Un NSa`..,�•M.9 .,.. 70, 9rt eE.P.+w i 800 a2a 5555 au,o..atsaaEr . - >D / ' xYYSS xCCKo,a.a..n0.•.." W+•oC]:`L«rfD ii� N[rEREMus: SW.,10T'-EE1 _ uiv.x 9. a sE",.n[c"a°`c i+-DC-sK _ I _"� — — / REVI�IDN n+s PL.oasnol (r.[gnt•9a.uMrs.Kr .... �� ..�• �.�r. DCI I GTE - `�^`r_` D�CANSON COMPANY.xnL. _ i'-.-- +�~ may^+ WA03B6-EARLINGTON SITE PLAN SCALE. , �50• i.r• o.•.•,AD 7o•,[ 2/23/98 RYERSON SITE ` ,y1v .w«,96160 200 OF EXISTING SITE SURVEY — . I..,VAN avf ms.WM eg .• ZIZI : '//// /- ' ..1.0,C.•o• •11.1•3 ., •/ .4,fit.1500,5•5.r.4-.1 . .4..:_.6.....VC•••,...: ' /, •I I - , •114.611 I . • DAM I 9 1.........., 1 • 1.1.... .. . ... i I 1_....... l_.., • .'• RAY.. NI...64,11 . . .. . Zi..I . . AWS1101.•.1.,..'",.,:,, -.'"--.- 2 . , . .....: i'' . . -C..---7--.•...C.Of . Li-I • .4 , .' &I ' 0.1%1M arum. 4 N . , •, '..' i 4..) •..,. , . W \ • .•",/././.• '1',/,../, ;, CON5-C...f....CN 5E' gl . \ ,':-//.//7.: '.'/' ../..• . . / '••..//'r• c• 1/,//r/ ; FRALEY/STRICKER• . I \ •ANCNITECT \ S• I as NAN a:Rom.nallro.10 \ •, 1.0.1C.• %NM --- \ ilP14414‘ r-.I -. ......\1;:.i7.,..• 1 . • . ; . I II 'N.—,.'...1:111.6•C- II § •;; . 11 I i 1/—....11 i• ' ..: T • y-".;•..•4[1. . .. . . . . I , . •' ' , .r' 1 , , . • .' • ..•v•../...• ,... . • . . ...../ • • I I '.. r'rri, . 111.."'"‘/,' .•• ,[1.1.1.111_] r-7 : •"''rr./ ' // ‘ //C..I • N. /r/ ',,..: / I •r„e,_:,:r.L.- -7- 1 ..-- . ....,„,.- - • 1.........• r arm A.Q ....;,....,4C......•— ., S-0.0.0•Co MOB ••••:;.:N...r,.. ..,.. C4N•Ci:::•1*. ... '5 i ......,7 MD.. , • 11,12t.rrk,-.0..• , .. no A.. ..._ m.-raect7a reEe504...WPM, . a.,.4 Out F.1 rl It..'-i.1-7'-..r..-=f,..7......:2••-•;7;r.-74 r some . . ,C118•••••It I .....•v..0.••••-woe ,...— . T°ft. .-...............- 44 3•Ml. 1•1•2 VII. I ••: ' I ; *- 1 I 1 s. /--21.1.1,11..• 4. , „.1. I.... ......: I ,:7Z...,44 CIP,..i...• , E 4.142L'N.C.-CP:/,—............,Mt V 6Iffil.119.41 . ,,Ve,..:'.— VIM`,....-.01.11 ir RANNAANN MIA: i I!IL.1 ''''-. MillAkir4, ‘7---il-Ti.----,,7''',,,,,.., I,.Aocmse I . 1 /I Not,.01111:1.en A ' IF .: 11 96...•,,,f -,11111111111114.I; AKA•••..... 4C•C RN the S'VECT e•s.2,2 •\ ‘; / r••••••ma..Oa.. i. .....<MN.•n..e• I 4—'2^-11,1 :lama....•mr•. ..2,-.:".%•I.A.tateNA / 1 'ZfA[1. 1 1 .4111,4111.•11,•••••MN. 1 wir.m.1 1 /ii itcno•-q, ENLAPIrsEL:NTE.1.6r4 I ,.. I .11=1..m.Mm.mmumnammin.. UM. Irc::::4•11.;A A: AND 70wEit I : .a..w......c...i ELEvATIONS di „ , ,,,,,, ..... ........ T.•••.101.LoAl.••PT. .16 Mdlr. .. ,Lr'il Ir, CP.,'OM,*I,..M. lwar wenot 1 Al kl4 into,..a.11, SCAM kW•...dr !2 ay. SCALE WV•r-O• 1-171ML.12101111 PLAN ILIE5•i0.102 ELEVATIal Trust St Germain Investors Eastlake Priscilla J Thornberg 9 Crescent Ky PO Box 700 4201 NE 41st St Bellevue WA 98006 Mercer Island WA 98040 Seattle WA 98105 Ronald M Forte John C Radovich JOHNSON LIEBER INC PO Box 816 2000 124th Ave NE PO Box 9723 Renton WA 98057 Bellevue WA 98005 Renton WA 98057 PACIFIC NORTHWEST GROUP R Investment W Family Lp Thoams 3131 S Vaughn Way Ste 20 515 116th Ave NE Ste 25 3407 N Washignton Aurora CO 80014 Bellevue WA 98004 Tacoma WA 98407 KNO CORPORATION RECREATIONAL EQUIPMENT EARLINGTON LTD PRTNRSHP 601 SW 7th St PO Box 1938 907 Thomas Ave SW Renton WA 98055 Sumner WA 98390 Renton WA 98055 SYSTEMS CONTROL INC PUGET SOUND POWER & LIG 8656 154th Ave NE PO Box 90868 Redmond WA 98052 Bellevue WA 98009 24 5c,-1- DEVELOPMENT PLAN! CITY OF RENTON APR 21 1998 RECEIVED ' ,f "T- a © CITY OF RENTON =, NalLPlanning/Building/Public Works o- a `irk"' {a� J VA 'V O c " ? APR 2 3'8 8 1'3 �i 3 ; a 2 9 5 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 w y .i{,. .;`n ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED a ►+ 71505B MET F!� 715U564_U.9. POSTAGE R Investment W 515 116th Ave NE Ste 25 Bellevue WA 98004 Oi DELIVERABLEiN ,�Str,{� AS ADDRESSED G` FEE! L Y.�,�...^i r. T ai !t tt 11 !t ! i ! ! jj ii }} i jj i tp ljl{ !! ii t:i' , R , \'i, ' '? '�0 .�� i{E!!!iFiti!�iFi!�il!!Z!f!!i�ii !�!SF!Ii�41F1ifFl F�l�lil E'Ei!!If i!il�Fiil�if 21 CIT` OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator June '3, 1998 Mr. 1-orazio Calcagno GTE Wireless of the Pacific, Inc. 2445 - 140th Avenue NE, Suite 202 Bellevue, WA 98005 SUB.IECT: GTE Wireless Earlington Site Project No. LUA-98-064,CU-A,ECF Dear Mr. Calcagno: This letter is to inform you that the comment and appeal periods have ended for the Environmental Review Committee's (ERC) Determination of Non-Significance for the above-referenced project. No 2 ppeals were filed. This decision is final and application for the appropriately required permits may proc ed. If yo 1 have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (425) 277-5586. For I he Environmental Review Committee, erwi Mars R. P , AICP Project M Hager cc: Mr. Joseph Ryerson/Owner Mr. Steve Welton/JM Consulting Group FIN/J nOC. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 2.% day of , 1998, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a5taled envelopetort,n orC docum:nts. This information was sent to: Name Representing Departr tent of Ecology Don Hu ter WSDOT KC Wa:tewater Treatment Division Larry F sher Washington Department of Fisheries David F. Dietzman Department of Natural Resources Shirley Lukhang Seattle Public Utilities Duwarr ish Indian Tribe Rod Malcom Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Joe Ja nga Puget Sound Energy (Signature of Sender) 50141d47 4 AOINti /G1. STATIE OF WASHINGTON ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that ,_._ya-nc )-71,1�r./vt_ a ., signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and Oluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: —Tito..? tia, t IA Notary Publi0 in and for the State of s ington Notary (Print) My appointment COMMISSION EXPIF3tb br19/99 Progitam5il 1 vvytim 5.4e Project Number: a• —o'.k CAl-A, eGF NOTARY.DOC CIT! JF RENTON :LL Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator May 398 Washingtc n State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PC) Box 4.703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Subject: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination and Environmental Checklist for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on May 19, 1998: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE G rE EARLINGTON SITE LI JA-98-064,CU-A,ECF The applicant seeks to construct a 100' tall tower with three antenna arrays located on top of it. The related gr ound equipment will be located in cabinets at the base of the antenna. Location: 600 SW 10th Street. Comments regarding the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM June 8, 1998. An I aggrieved person feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence that could not be reason ably available at the time of the determination may submit written comments. After review of the comments, if the Envirc nmental Review Committee finds there is not sufficient evidence to amend its original determination, then there will oe no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action would need to file a formal ap: eal within the original 15-day timeframe. Written comments must be filed with: Jana Huerter, Land Use Review S ipervisor, City of Renton Development Services Division, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals )f either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3),WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM June 8, 1998. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will becor le final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton M unicipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-235-2501. If you ha\e questions, please call me at (425) 277-5586. For the Environmental Review Committee, //M2(//fr%' -- ark R. l' , AICP Project pager cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division Larry Fisher, Department of Fisheries David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources Don Hurter, Department of Transportation Shirley Lukhang, Seattle Public Utilities Duwamish Tribal Office Rod Malcom, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (Ordinance) Joe Jainga, Puget Sound Energy AGNCYLTR.P \ 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE APPLICATION NUMBER: LUA-98-064,CU-A,ECF APPLICAN r: GTE Wireless of the Pacific, Inc. (Horazio Calcagno) PROJECT NAME: GTE Wireless PCS/Earlington DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks to construct a 100' tall tower with three antenna arrays located on op of it. The related ground equipment will be located in cabinets at the base of the antenna. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 600 SW 10th Street LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section This Determination of Non-Significance is issued under WAC 197-11-340. Because other agencies of jurisdiction may be involved, tl ie lead agency will not act on this proposal for fifteen (15) days. Comment: regarding the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM June 8, 1998. Any aggrieved person feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence that could not be reasons.bly available at the time of the determination may submit written comments. After review of the comments, if the Environmental Review Committee finds there is not sufficient evidence to amend its original determination, then there will b e no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action would need to file a formal appeal within the original 15-day timeframe. Written comments must be filed with: Jana Huerter, Land Use Review Supervisor, City of Renton Development Services Division, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM June 8, 1998. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Mi.nicipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton CH y Clerk's Office, (425)-235-2501. PUBLICATION DATE: May 25, 1998 DATE OF DECISION: May 19, 1998 SIGNATU RES: //1/7 Gregg Zi n rmap, Administrator DATE Departme'n of Panning/Building/Public Works •175 ,/-. _ " Chastain, Administrator DATE Communi'y Services Department , 7 /4 4,%ft,"A 11;__ F5/( rq(gr e heeler, Fire, i DATE enton Fire Department DNSSIG.DOC • rt, CIT`. OF RENTON ..LL % Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator May 20, 1998 Mr. Horazio Calcagno GTE Wireless of the Pacific, Inc. 2445- 140th Avenue NE, Suite 202 Bellevue, WA 98005 SUBJECT: GTE Wireless Earlington Site Project No. LUA-98-064,CU-A,ECF Dear Mr. Calcagno: This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) and is to inform you that they have completed their review of the environmental impacts of the above-referenced project. The Committee, on May 19, 1998, 'decided that your project will be issued a Determination of Non-Significance. The City of Renton ERC has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made by the ERC under the authority of Section 4-6-6, Renton Municipal Code, after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information, on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. Comments regarding the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM June 8, 1998. Any aggrieved person feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence that could not be reasonably available at the time of the determination may submit written comments. After review of the comments, if the Environmental Review Committee finds there is not sufficient evidence to amend its original determination, then there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action would need to file a formal appeal within the original 15-day timeframe. Written comments must be filed with: Jana Huerter, Land Use Review Supervisor, City of Renton Development Services Division, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM June 8, 1998. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-235-2501. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at (206) 277-5586. For the Environmental Review Committee, /-1:1/4 / Mark R. Pywell v ICP Project Mane er cc: Mr. Joseph Ryerson/Owner Mr. Steve Welton/JM Consulting Group DNSLTB DOC 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE ADVISORY NOTES A'PLICATION NUMBER: LUA-98-064,CU-A,ECF A DPLICANT: GTE Wireless of the Pacific, Inc. (Horazio Calcagno) P 2OJECT NAME: GTE Wireless PCS/Earlington DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks to construct a 100' tall tower with tl•ree antenna arrays located on top of it. The related ground equipment will be located in clbinets at the base of the antenna. L:)CATION OF PROPOSAL: 600 SW 10th Street Advisory Notes to Applicant: T he following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. 1. Applicant shall comply with applicable local, regional, state, and federal laws and ordinances in constructing and operating the facility. 2. Applicant shall provide a copy of the Federal Aviation Administration Notice of Proposed Construction to the City prior to the issuance of Building Permits. AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Kristina J. Thompson, being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of the SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL Legals May 25, 1998.4679 600 S. Washington Avenue, Kent, Washington 98032 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE a daily newspaper published seven (7)times a week. Said newspaper is a legal RENTON,WASHINGTON newspaper of general publication and is now and has been for more than six months The Environmental Review Committee Non- prior to the date ofpublication, referred to, printed and published in the English language (ERCi has issued a Determination proje t Nder p gSignificance for the following project under continually as a daily newspaper in Kent, King County, Washington. The South County the authority of the Renton Municipal Journal has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the Code. TE N State of Washington for King County. LUA-98-064 CU A-ECF SITE The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the South County Applicant, GTE Wireless, seeks to con- Journal (and not in supplemental form) which was regularly distributed to the subscribers array a oc10 ft.e tall tower owf it. antenna arrays located on top of it. The related during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a ground equipment will be located in cabi- nets at the base of the antenna. Location: 10th GTE Earlington Site 600 TheN15 daySt.comment and appeal period for this project will run concurrently and as published on: 5/25/98 end at 5:00 PM on June 8, 1998.Following this, the City will finalize its Determination unless comments received require a recon- The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of$43.88 sideration.Written comments and requests Legal Number 4679 for reconsideration shall be forwarded to the Development Services Division Land Use Review Supervisor. Information on the project file is available at the Development ctS7L Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. a $OUCounty Journal Phone: 235-2550. Appeal procedures are y available in the City Clerk's office, First Floor,Municipal Building. Published in the South County Journal Subscribed and sworn before me on this (qay of c1T sZ, 19 9 .010111011,,. qF y; Notary Public of the State of Washington �•�TAr N• y= residing in Renton King County, Washington 244•• NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON Tht, Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance for the foil awing project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. GTE EARLINGTON SITE LUA-98-064,CU-A,ECF Applicant, GTE Wireless, seeks to construct a 100 ft. tall tower with three antenna arrays located on top of it. The related ground equipment will be located in cabinets at the base of the antenna. Location: 600 SW 10th St. Th 3 15 day comment and appeal period for this project will run concurrently and end at 5:00 PM on June 8, 1998. Following this, the City will finalize its Determination unless comments received require a reconsideration. Written comments and requests for reconsideration shall be forwarded to the De✓elopment Services Division Land Use Review Supervisor. Information on the project file is available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. Appeal procedures are available in the City Clerk's office, First Floor, Municipal Bu !ding. P�blication Date: May 25, 1998 Ac count No. 51067 drspub NOTIcb ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: GTE WIRELESS EARLINGTON SITE PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-98-084,CU-A,ECF The applicant,GTE Wireless,seeks to construct a 100 ft.tall tower with three antenna arrays located on top of it.The related ground equipment will be located In cabinets at the base of the antenna. Location: 600 SW 10th St. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Comments regarding the environmental determination must be filed In writing on or before 6:00 PM June 8, 1998. Any aggrieved person feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee Is based on erroneous procedure,errors of law or fact,error in Judgment,or the discovery of new evidence that could not be reasonably available at the time of the determination may submit written comments. After review of the comments,if the Environmental Review Committee finds there is not sufficient evidence to amend Its original determination,then there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person ` wishing to take further action would need to file a formal appeal within the original 15-day timeframe. Written comments must be filed with:Jana Huerter,Land Use Review Supervisor,City of Renton Development Services Division,200 Mill Avenue South,Renton,WA 98055. Appeals of either the environmental determination(RCW 43.21.0075(3),WAC 197.11-8801 and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM June 8,1998. If no appeals are filed by this date,both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required 575.00 application fee with:Hearing Examiner,City of Renton,200 Mill Avenue South,Renton,WA 98055.Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-118. Additional Information regarding;the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office,(425)-235.2501. • `-1:: • ,r/• _. � - ` • Y • . •. ATM. mi • , 5 • i i •h h'�;{{ is a_'.II��UI i1 :11 -"`� _ ? I♦'�,1.,. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION,PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON,DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT(425)235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. /1/frIT /l4J,/ 'r7, hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document were posted by me in `3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on fi, Z,' • Signed: ATTEST: Subcribed and sworn before me, a Nortary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing inj dv� � , on the 26 y->.. day of au, MARILYN KAMCHEFF COMMISSION EXPIRES 6/29/99 tl\j/QIITt ICE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: GTE WIRELESS EARLINGTON SITE PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-98-064,CU-A,ECF The applicant, GTE Wireless,seeks to construct a 100 ft.tall tower with three antenna arrays located on top of it. The related ground equipment will be located in cabinets at the base of the antenna. Location: 600 SW 10th St. THE: CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED TH/,T THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE EN`(IRONMENT. Con ments regarding the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM June 8, 199e. Any aggrieved person feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Con imittee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evic ence that could not be reasonably available at the time of the determination may submit written comments. Aftc r review of the comments, if the Environmental Review Committee finds there is not sufficient evidence to amf nd its original determination, then there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wis ling to take further action would need to file a formal appeal within the original 15-day timeframe. Written comments must be filed with: Jana Huerter, Land Use Review Supervisor, City of Renton Development Services Div.sion,200 Mill Avenue South,Renton,WA 98055. Apr eals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use dec sion must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM June 8, 1998. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are goy erned by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding,the appeal pro:ess may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office,(425)-235-2501. *e..: 1 y ;i.L.,r /'• ' • 1,; ?. , 1 I..' s 4` 1,1, '\ ' ,� <\ ; ;"r-1., $f. _ ..._ _ . . _-. . 1 I 1 ' a r`,' a ..- '\tom /, rIn IV ,- a As_•_&_ 'ar- •`; 1 r'', t: 1 •Ili- °�-'�--,�._.; e. ,} J`.E fS. :. I. -..t �n. �. • -_,'Selo ' 1 v.. • l It �. (5P . `•A ik` . ? 1 ,i :!it iE '��'° -. 1 1- t t r, t Ii -T,f N ,Y p •s rl FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT(425) 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. • REPORT City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works DECISION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW & ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION DECISION DATE: May 19, 1998 Project Name: GTE Wireless PCS -- Earlington Applicant: GTE Wireless of the Pacific, Inc. (Horazio Calcagno) Owner. Joseph T. Ryerson File Number: LUA-098-064,CU-A,ECF Project Manager: Mark R. Pywell, AICP Project Description: The applicant seeks to construct a 100' tall tower with three antenna arrays located on top of it. The related ground equipment will be located in cabinets at the base of the antenna. Project Location: 600 SW 10th Street Exist. Bldg. Area SF: N/A Proposed New Bldg. Area SF: N/A Site Aiea: 600 sf Total Building Area SF: N/A �.. \ -0 r I -- ... • -I. / t" WIRELESS -- - - INCORPORATED oF� . ...-� � 'I ,i .-- 4.7 F.�....-.1 ... �.. �-sr��- x(IO.MOIPI00D Nu 4 E CENTER1''� F. �/{' I w� +' wLesos fI '/` •' 'I •—..1 'ji Y • / I \ .41'.'-.� 1, +i .imme �, — `.�+Y - . _ NMa A9i7ior'd"`.. Kra' +--cam' �yr� . -pi, i II - - -T i I i -4 ' ..ii, I '' 1 ”" I is. r •... --J. ..... - oil... .r 1l,'^ ,0 E..l�� i. ....,,.., ....„.... , .,... . . kE ! 1,---...t !, .. � ,p� / 1°f1UEEEt r, i77 4. 0°y��,'!...ill �'l.c t,tq l: �� ) q 4. yy.+.; _-^ vtl igitir 1 1 7,1�.N Aida_ 01,1l • = 1 n o it iirpOili�P ,„,,,,,Tp�i '. J � - ?•1off3r'? !1 1.!lopyi I +,--', f s°� GM i"N 7 a 1. fic I g, IT . , w _. I ti 14, / ' s .-' � �;ii:02 1P15111ii 11 S Il1,.'. .—rr• i' �'1: 7 : Stu �, 10 $ /' Project Location Map ACUExcnoc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Conditional Use Permit&E mmental Review Committee Staff Report GTE Wireless PCS--Earlington LUA-98-064, CU-A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF May 18,1998 Page 2 of 10 PART ONE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND The applicant, GTE Wireless proposes to install a Personal Communications Services (PCS) facility on an industrially zoned property in the eastern portion of the city at 600 SW 10th Street. T ie site is presently developed with an industrial building used for a steel component assembly plant. The proposal would result in the installation of an 100-foot high antenna support structure (monopole) which would support an antenna array. The array includes 9 panel antennas which are a >proximately 5 feet long by 6 to 8-inches wide by 3-inches deep. An overall height of 109 feet would result from the installation of the monopole plus antenna arrays. The lightening rod at the tc p of the structure would extend the height of the overall structure. The Airport Manager e;timates the total height of the complete structure at elevation 129 feet. The applicant will need to s ibmit a Notice of Proposed Construction to the FAA. It will be the responsibility of the applicant to rr aintain any required navigational lighting or painting of the structure. Tie subject property is zoned Medium Industrial as are the surrounding properties. This area of the City has developed as a medium industrial/office complex area. The monopole will be visible from that portion of Grady Way that is developing as the automall, office areas, and a hotel. The project site is located on the North boundary of the subject property and just East of Seneca Ave. The area is currently unused and is covered by grass and asphalt. The proposed development will only require an additional 250 sf of paving in order to provide a base for the tower and the electrical equipment cabinets. ['ART TWO: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW In compliance with RCW 43.21 C.240, the following project environmental review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. A. Environmental Impacts The Proposal was circulated and reviewed by various City Departments and Divisions to determine whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed development. Staff reviewers have identified that the proposal is likely to have the following probable impacts: (1) Earth Impacts: The site is presently covered with asphalt and turf. No erosion is expected to result from site preparation and construction of the 600 square foot equipment compound area. However, the applicant would need to install and maintain temporary erosion control measures during the construction phase of the project, per City Code requirements. Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures required. Policy Nexus: N/A ACU ER C.DOG City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Conditional Use Permit&E ,nmental Review Committee Staff Report GTE Wirele.ls PCS--Earlington LUA-98-064, CU-A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF May 18,1998 Page 3 of 10 (2) Air Impacts: Air quality impacts are limited to the fugitive dust during the construction phase of the project and exhaust fumes from construction equipment. Construction of this project will occur in a limited time frame, which is expected to last no more than two weeks. Fugitive dust will be controlled through compliance with the methods required by the City, such as sprinkling the site and the use of erosion control measures. Exhaust from construction equipment is regulated by state and federal standards. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation measures required. Policy Nexus: N/A (3) Water Impacts: There will only be a small increase in the impervious surface area on the subject property. The increase of approximately 250 sf will not cause an increase in the amount of runoff sufficient to require new stormwater facilities. It is anticipated that the existing facilities will be able to accept the increase in storm water runoff. Mitigation Measures: None required. Policy Nexus: N/A (4) Aesthetics Impacts: The proposal would introduce an additional man-made vertical element to the landscape. The proposed monopole plus antenna array would be a maximum of 100+ feet above the existing ground surface. The appearance of the monopole would be similar in appearance to existing light standards located along the public right-of-way abutting the subject parcel, but would be taller. Photo-simulations provided by the applicant illustrate before and after views of the facility as modeled for several locations: from Seneca/SW 7th Street looking South; from Oakesdale Ave. looking East; from SW 10th looking North; and from Grady Way at Rainier Ave. looking West. The photo-simulations demonstrate that the monopole would be visible, but they do not show the facility to be obtrusive, or blocking existing views. It is clear that visual complexity of the area would increase, and that the monopole in combination with light standards and signs would add to the visual clutter of the area. This is not considered to be a significant impact though, nor, is it one that can be easily diminished or eliminated without denying the applicant's request, or decreasing the height of the pole. The City's goal is to require collocation to ultimately reduce the number of monopoles in the City. This facility would allow one other purveyor to collocate at this location, thus eliminating the need for an additional monopole of equal or less height. The applicant is proposing a monopole with a finish that would not produce glare. The applicant has indicated that they will paint the pole any color that the City may require. However, the flat gray color that has become the industrial standard is the most appropriate color in this area. ACUERC. )OC City of Renton P/B/PWDepartment Administrative Conditional Use Permit&L mmental Review Committee Staff Report GTE Wireless PCS--Earlington LUA-98-064, CU-A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF May 18, 1998 Page 4 of 10 The applicant is proposing to provide a five foot wide landscape screen along the East, West, and South sides of the proposed facility. There is already a landscape buffer along the boundary of the proposed site that was part of the original development in this area. There is no need for the applicant to duplicate the existing landscaping. The applicant will also be installing a chain link fence behind the landscaping. Slats will be installed in the fence to further obscure the view of the equipment cabinets. No further buffer or landscaping is required. The applicant has requested a waiver of the landscaping along the North boundary of the site. This is not necessary as the existing landscaping in this area already meets the requirement. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation is required. Policy Nexus: N/A E. Recommendation Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommend that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINATION OF DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE NON- SIGNIFICANCE- MITIGATED. Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment and Appeal Period. • Issue DNS with 15 day Comment and Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment X Appeal Period. Period followed by a 14 day Appeal Period. C. Mitigation Measures Hone required. Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appea process for environmental determinations, 1. Applicant shall comply with applicable local, regional, state, and federal laws and ordinances in constructing and operating the facility. 2. Applicant shall provide a copy of the Federal Aviation Administration Notice of Proposed Construction to the amity prior to the issuance of Building Permits. ACUERC.JOC City of Renton P/B/PWDepartment Administrative Conditional Use Permit&1 mmental Review Committee Staff Report GTE Wireless PCS--Earlington LUA-98-064, CU-A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OFMay 18,1998 Page 5 of 10 This decision on the administrative land use action is made concurrently with the environmental determination. A. Type of Land Use Action x Conditional Use--Administrative Binding Site Plan Site Plan Review Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Special Permit for Grade&Fill Administrative Code Determination B. Exhibits The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing: application, proof of posting and publication, and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No. 2: Drawing No. T-1, Site Plan (Received April 21, 1998) Exhibit No. 3: Drawing No. A-1, Project Plan, (Received April 21, 1998) Exhibit No. 4: Drawing No. A-2, Exterior Elevations, (Received April 21, 1998) Exhibit No. 5: Drawing No. L-1, Landscape Plan, (Received April 21, 1998) Exhibit No. 6: Photo-simulations (Received April 21, 1998) C. Project Description/Background: The applicant, GTE Wireless is proposing to install a wireless communications facility consisting of an 100- foot high monopole, with 12 antennas and an equipment cabinet (approximately 8 feet in length and 6 feet high and 2 feet in width). The facility would occupy a 600 square foot area of the existing Ryerson building site. This area is generally referred to as the Valley industrial area. The overall height of the facility would be between 100 and 109 feet, and the monopole would be visible from off-site areas. The existing ground elevation is assumed to be elevation 20 feet or in other words 20 feet above sea level. The applicant has stated that the height of the monopole was determined in order to meet engineering requirements and to provide an opportunity for other purveyors to collocate, while allowing adequate separation of facilities. The site is zoned IM (Medium Industrial). This facility is considered to be a Monopole II facility based on definitions in the City's recently adopted Wireless Communications Ordinance. ACUERC.DOC City of Renton PB/PW Department Administrative Conditional Use Permit&b rnmental Review Committee Staff Report GTE Wireless PCS--Earlington LUA-98-064, CU-A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF May 18,1998 Page 6 of 10 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION Having reviewed the written record in the matter, the City now makes and enters the following: D. Findings 1) CONSISTENCY WITH CONDITIONAL USE CRITERIA Section 4-31-14 lists 10 factors that the governing authority shall consider in determining whether to issue a conditional use permit (although the governing authority may waive or reduce the burden on the applicant of one or more of these criteria if the governing authority, concludes that the goals of this ordinance are better served thereby). The 10 factors are as follows: 1. HEIGHT OF THE PROPOSED TOWER The project site is designated as IM (Medium Industrial) Zoning on the City's Zoning Map. There are no height limits in this zone except for the limits established by the site's proximity to the Renton Municipal Airport. The Airport Manager has stated that the Airport Horizontal Surface establishes a height limit at elevation 179 feet in this area. The proposed development with the lightening antenna would reach a maximum height of elevation 129. Therefore, the proposed structure is consistent with the height limitations established for this area by City Ordinance. 2. PROXIMITY OF THE TOWER TO RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES AND RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT BOUNDARIES The applicant states that the proposal is located within a industrial/commercial office area. There are no residential structures or residential district boundaries near the project site. The proposed hotel at the corner of Oakesdale Ave. and SW Grady Way is considered to be a commercial structure and not a residential structure, such as a single family home or apartment building. The nearest residential structures to the project site are located approximately 1/3 of a mile to the North of the subject property. Existing trees, buildings, and other structures will obscure the view of the tower from the residential area. The proposed tower will not substantially alter the view from this residential area. 3. NATURE OF USES ON ADJACENT AND NEARBY PROPERTIES The subject site is developed with an industrial use. The existing building is used for the assembly of steel components. All of this work is conducted within the building. The proposal would occur on a portion of the site that is partly impervious surface and partly turf. The equipment compound would be located on the north boundary of the subject property, away from the ongoing industrial use of the site. This 600 square foot compound area would not measurably increase lot coverage of existing development. Permitted lot coverage in the IM Zone is not limited. However, all unused areas are to be landscaped. For the most part the applicant has left these areas in turf for ease of maintenance. There is also a requirement that 2% of a site be retained as wildlife habitat area. This was addressed at the time of the original development of the site and no further wildlife area is required as part of this project as the wildlife area is determined by the size of the site not the amount of area used for the industrial development. The proposed location is part of an industrial/commercial area with zoning that a variety of industrial and commercial uses. Wireless base stations are defined as medium utilities, which are permitted in the IM Zone with an Administrative Conditional Use Permit. The site appears to be suitable for the proposed use. ACUERC.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Conditional Use Permit&E Pnmental Review Committee Staff Report GTE Wireless PCS--Earlington LUA-98-064, CU-A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF May 18,1998 Page 7 of 10 4. SURROUNDING TOPOGRAPHY The project site and the surrounding area are relatively flat. The topography rises towards the North of the project site. This slope starts approximately 1/3 of a mile from the project site and continues on into King County. The adjacent area to the East, West, and South of the site are at approximately the same elevation as the subject property with only minor changes in the elevation. 5. SURROUNDING TREE COVERAGE AND FOLIAGE Both deciduous and coniferous tree cover is present in the surrounding area. Most of the trees are located along property boundaries and along streets. Further to the north there is a band of trees located on some larger parcels and along the steep slopes. A band of evergreen trees along the north boundary of the subject parcel will help to screen the land use from the adjacent parcels. 6. DESIGN OF THE TOWER, WITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO DESIGN CHARACTERISTICS THAT HAVE THE EFFECT OF REDUCING OR ELIMINATING VISUAL OBTRUSIVENESS The 100-foot monopole and attached 15-foot high panel antennas would have an overall height of approximately 110-feet. The proposed monopole would be visible from on- and off-site locations. Photo-simulations have been provided which show before and after views of the proposed facilities from several vantage points. The monopole would be located on the northern boundary of the property, backing up to the existing landscape strip which consist mainly of evergreen trees. The existing tree cover would provide some absorption of the lower portion of the facility when viewed from off-site areas to the North. No alternate locations on the subject property are proposed for the monopole. Any movement of the monopole to other locations in the immediate area would not measurably diminish the view of the facility. The monopole would remain in the foreground view area for parcels to the North. 7. PROPOSED INGRESS AND EGRESS Access to the proposed facility would be from Seneca Avenue. Access would be needed during construction and any necessary or scheduled maintenance. The proposed facility would not displace parking or require additional parking. Maintenance of the facility would require a visit to the site approximately once each month, and existing parking would be utilized to accomplish the maintenance. The occasional service vehicle should not require the addition of any additional on-site parking. 8. POTENTIAL NOISE, LIGHT AND GLARE IMPACTS. The monopole, antennas and equipment cabinet are not expected to generate noise, light or glare. The facility would have a small fan which would generate negligible noise. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) will need to be consulted to determine whether or not lighting or marking of the proposed 100-foot high is needed. If lighting is required, glare is not anticipated from the navigational lighting due to its low level of light and the location of the lighting on the top part of the monopole. Glare from the monopole itself is not expected to result, as it would be painted with a non-glare finish. 9. AVAILABILITY OF SUITABLE EXISTING TOWERS AND OTHER STRUCTURES There are no suitable towers or other existing structures in the immediate area of the proposed location. It might be possible to locate a facility on one of the adjacent buildings in this area but whereas there are no buildings with the height of the proposed tower it would only eliminate the bottom portion of the tower. The applicant would still need to construct a tower type of structure on the roof of a building in order to achieve the same height as the proposed tower. ACUERC.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Conditional Use Permit&E mmental Review Committee Staff Report GTE Wireless PCS--Earlington LUA-98-064, CU-A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF May 18,1998 Page 8 of 10 10. COMPATIBILITY WITH THE GENERAL PURPOSE, GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND STANDARDS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND ANY OF THE PLAN, PROGRAM, MAP OR ORDINANCE OF THE CITY. (A) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, ITS ELEMENTS AND POLICIES The proposed telecommunications facility is consistent with the following Comprehensive Plan policies: Policy U-1: Utility facilities and services should be consistent with the growth and development concepts directed by the Comprehensive Plan. The City of Renton's business, industrial, and residential development is growing. The expansion of the Personal Communication System within the City is to ensure that a high quality of service can be offered to the local and regional community. Policy U-5: Encourage the appropriate siting, construction, operation, and decommissioning of all utility systems in a manner that reasonably minimizes impacts on adjacent land uses. The applicant has stated that the proposed facility has been located and designed to minimize aesthetic impacts of the community while providing a valuable communication service. The design of an 100-foot high monopole with antennas would allow for the collocation of one additional carrier, thus reducing the total number of monopoles that would likely occur in the vicinity over time. The nearest residential dwellings are at least 1/3 of a mile from the proposed structure. Policy U-100: Require that the siting and location of telecommunications facilities be accomplished in a manner that minimizes adverse impacts on the environment and adjacent land uses. The monopole has been proposed for location on an existing developed industrial property in the Medium Industrial (IM) Zone. No environmentally sensitive areas would be disturbed to construct or operate the facility. The 100-foot monopole height with antennas was determined to satisfy engineering requirements of the applicant and to provide an opportunity for one additional purveyor to collocate on the monopole, consistent with the City's Wireless Communications Ordinance. Photo-simulations provided by the applicant show the monopole location from several vantage points, although the tower is noticeable in the pictures it will not dominate the view of the surrounding area. Policy U-101: Require that cellular communication structures and towers be sensitively sited and designed to diminish aesthetic impacts, and be collocated on existing structures and towers wherever possible and practical. The applicant states that the specific location was to provide the required coverage in this area of the City and along the 1-405 corridor. There are several areas of poor coverage and some areas with little or no coverage within the area intended to be served by the proposed tower. The tower will allow GTE to provide the level of service in this area required by federal regulations. The proposal would allow the collocation of an additional one additional purveyors on the monopole, which would meet the intent of the Comprehensive Plan policies for collocation. (B) ZONING CODE The project site is zoned IM (medium Industrial). The IM zoning allows for medium utilities provided that an administrative conditional use permit is approved. The proposed tower has been located in accordance with the development standards contained within the IM Zone. No setback from the property is required as it is a rear property line. The IM zone does not provide for a height limitation. However, the Airport Zoning does establish height limits due to the proximity of the site to the airport. The proposed antenna is within the height limit established for this area of the City. ACUERC DOC City of Renton PB/PWDepartment Administrative Conditional Use Permit&b nmental Review Committee Staff Report GTE Wireless PCS--Earlington LUA-98-064, CU-A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF May 18,1998 Page 9 of 10 (C) ORDINANCE 4689-- WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES The proposal is regulated by the recently adopted Wireless Communication Facilities Ordinance. Monopole facilities of greater than 60 feet but less than 150 feet in height are considered to be Monopole II facilities. The proposed structure would is permitted in the IM Zone, subject to an Administrative Conditional Use Permit. 2) REQUEST: The Applicant, GTE Wireless of the Pacific, has requested approval for Administrative Conditional Use Permit for a proposed Personal Communication Services (PCS) facility at 600 10th Street. The proposal includes the installation of an 100-foot high monopole with an 12 antennas and a lightening rod resulting in an additional 10 feet of height, for an overall height of 109-feet (elevation 129). Two radio equipment cabinets are also proposed. 3) ADMINISTRATIVE CONDITIONAL USE: The applicant's administrative conditional use application generally complies with the submittal requirements for a Conditional Use Permit. The applicant's site plan and other project drawings are entered as Exhibits No. 1 through 6. 4) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The subject proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Employment Area - Valley. 5) ZONING: The proposal complies with the zoning requirements and development standards of the IM (Medium Industrial) Zone. 6) WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS ORDINANCE: The proposal as presented, complies with the requirements and standards of the Wireless Communications Ordinance. 7) EXISTING LAND USE: Land uses surrounding the subject site include: North: industrial and commercial office; East: industrial and commercial; South: industrial and commercial; and West: industrial and commercial. E. Conclusions 1) The subject proposal complies with the policies and codes of the City of Renton. 2) Specific Land Use (e.g. Administrative Conditional Use Permit) issues were raised by various City departments as follows: a) Airport Manager commented that the proposal requires that a Notice of Proposed Construction must be submitted to and approved by the FAA. The base of the facility is at elevation 20 feet. The overall height of the monopole, antennas is at elevation 129. 3) The proposal generally complies with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Employment Area - Valley and the Zoning designation of Medium Industrial. 4) The proposal generally complies with the Ordinance 4689 regulating Wireless Communications Facilities. F. Decision The Administrative Conditional Use Permit for GTE Wireless at 600 SW 10th Street, File No. LUA-98-064, ACU, ECF is approved. SIGNATURE: ACUERC.DOC • City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Conditional Use Permit&h ,nmental Review Committee Staff Report GTE Wireless PCS--Earlington LUA-98-064, CU-A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF May 18,1998 Page 10 of 10 James C. Hanson, Zoning Administrator approval date TRANSMITTED this 22nd day of May, 1998 to the applicant and owner: Joseph T. Ryerson 30 W. Monroe Street Chicago, IL 60603 Horazio Calcagno GTE Wireless of the Pacific, Inc. 2445 140th Ave. NE, Suite 202 Bellevue, WA 98005 TRANSMITTED this 22nd day of May, 1998 to the parties of record: None listed. TRANSMITTED this 22nd day of May, 1998 to the following: Larry Meckling-Building Official„ Neil Watts-Public Works Division, Art Larson-Fire Marshal, Lawrence J.Warren-City Attorney, South County Journal Environmental Determination Comment Process Comments regarding the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM June 8, 1998. Any aggrieved person feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence that could not be reasonably available at the time of the determination may submit written comments. After review of the comments, if the Environmental Review Committee finds there is not sufficient evidence to amend its original determination, then there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action would need to file a formal appeal within the original 15-day timeframe. Written comments must be filed with: Jana Huerter, Land Use Review Supervisor, City of Renton Development Services Division, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Environmental Determination and Land Use Decision Appeal Process Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM June 8, 1998. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-118. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-235-2501. ACUERC DOC City ui kenton Department of Planning/Building/F. Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: park..5 COMMENTS DUE: MAY 6, 1998 APPLICATION NO LUA98-064,CU-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 22, 1998 APPLICANT: GTE.Wireless PROJECT MANAGER: Mark Pywell PROJECT TITLE: GTE Earlington Site WORK ORDER NO: 78376 LOCATION: 600 SW 10th Street SITE AREA: 600 s.f. BUILDING AREA(gross): SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, GTE Wireless, seeks to construct a 100'tall monopole with three antenna arrays and ground equipment. A. ENVIRONN ENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline USE Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE RELATED COMMENTS ie /6. We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. // //Cif= Sig ure of Director or Authorized epresentative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev 10/93 City L., den ton Department of Planning/Building/Fuouc Works ENVIRONMENTAL 8, DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: taoi- rbwic, ©eq n Q,i- COMMENTS DUE: MAY 6, 1998 APPLICATION NO LUA98-064,CU-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 22, 1998 APPLICANT: GTE Wireless PROJECT MANAGER: Mark Pywell PROJECT TITLE: GTE Earlington Site WORK ORDER NO: 78376 LOCATION: 600 SW 10th Street SITE AREA: 600 s.f. ( BUILDING AREA(gross): SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, GTE Wireless, seeks to construct a 100' tall monopole with three antenna arrays and ground equipment. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY/� •REELLA��TED COMMENTS E30 ,p / c+Q C. CODE RELATED COMMENTS We have rei iewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additi final informed is tede to properly assess this proposal. 1A-2-1(el Signature of Dirr Authorized Representative Date DEV APP.DOC Rev.10193 City u, ,zenton Department of Planning/Building/Fuui, Works ENVIRONMENTAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: poke, COMMENTS DUE: MAY 6, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA98-064,CU-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 22, 1998 APPLICANT: GTE Wireless PROJECT MANAGER: Mark Pywell PROJECT TITLE: 3TE Earlington Site WORK ORDER NO: 78376 LOCATION: 600 ;,W 10th Street SITE AREA: 600 s.f. BUILDING AREA(gross): SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, GTE Wireless, seeks to construct a 100'tall monopole with three antenna arrays and ground equipment. A. ENVIRONMi:NTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Heal i Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet /P.A/, 1 L ein."04 ct ern z _cam B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 1 SignaturVof Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev 1C/93 City.,, ,.enton Department of Planning/Building/PUum.. Works ENVIRON,IIENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:CohstoLch 711 S,e (c.2d COMMENTS DUE: MAY 6, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA98-064,CU-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 22, 1998 APPLICANT: GTE Nireless PROJECT MANAGER: Mark Pywell '-0 , PROJECT TITLE: 3TE Earlington Site WORK ORDER NO: 78376 LOCATION: 600 S W 10th Street SITE AREA: 600E.f. I BUILDING AREA(gross): 4.".,4, dr SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, GTE Wireless, seeks to construct a 100'tall monopole with threm'agtenna arrays and ground equipment '-'ifJ4 A. ENVIRONMI'NTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water LighVGlare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Heel Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-?ELATED COMMENTS ge,14 f .,e,i e-e- 1-c-€:4-/A,i-,--..Z A p,,,,z,j. We have renewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where ad ' nal information is needed to properly assess this proposal. /1 -*/ 471/0 -7/ci ature of Direc or Authored epres a Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 City r‘enton Department of Planning/Building/Puoiic Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: r-Atre COMMENTS DUE: MAY 6, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA98-064,CU-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 22, 1998 APPLICANT: GTE Wireless PROJECT MANAGER: Mark Pywell PROJECT TITLE: GTE Earlington Site _ WORK ORDER NO: 78376 LOCATION: 600 SW 10th Street SITE AREA: 600 s.f. BUILDING AREA(gross): SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, GTE Wireless, seeks to construct a 100'tall monopole with three antenna arrays and ground equipment. A. ENVIRONM,=NTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use XX Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Heal h Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet y e s 14,000 Feet no GTE states :hat the antenna is 100' in height. The drawing shows that the antenna structure is 100' high to some undefinite: point on the structure, and in fact, the lightening rod extends above the top of the pole approximately 11 feet. This would make the top of the structure and appendiges 129' . The diagram shown on drawing Al clearly illustrates that the tower and antennas are higher than the claimed 100' (or 120' elevation) . The 129' elevation of the top of the tower/antennas/lightening rod is below the 179' elevation of the Airport Horizontal Surface. B. POLICY RELATED COMMENTS The applicant must be made responsible for installation and maintenance of any required FAA lightiig and/or painting or marking, throughout the life of the structure. C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS Same as above. We have iewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where a "tional informa needed to properly assess this proposal. (C) Qa0iAi 2—it k g Signat f Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAP DO Rev.10/93 1 nfs.. I ■M ,,-:--_--_-:-:-:-- -_-:-::::::-:-.:-.7-:-:-:-:-:-.7: -:-.-.-_ • > /AI, :-:-.::::::::::::::::::::::: --- ./4t1 I 71 IWI Ciii--21:E.-::_::E:1-:::------:::::-__--K:K.:E:::-:-:::-::-::::-:Ei--------::::E:E::-::::-.. '7 ./-.'"?-/ ----------------17-::::::::;_-_______-;]-1/, N I Iii ''. " /\NU Id_::::::=E:1:E:K:::-:i.:K.:_tia::::]:::::_::_§_::::::-::::::::::_:::_fs"-::::::::::::-- ---_-_-_Vid,r-:-:--------- _......___ __ Atli kl I al_ L Aka I 1:1 ..r, ___,A it wily wiy, Ek11 •.' A-- I- ------- --------- --- - --- ---_ -_ -----1-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-:-:---_-_-_--- M.1 � N - ------ :-:.: .- __:__ _-_-__=___= ll:C{{{t�Yi v=== _==_====-r v___=_-_-•- .-.. ...... . AI 1.—.��ram '',' i Pi hre 7.:::::::.:E:7 =-_::====_= _ =- = ======_==-=======-=_=_- _-`�==- �I �� .ham V\/91 6.1,ki_LI), ,--.:,---.-.::--:-:::-:-:-::::---:---::::::::-:-:-:::::::::::::-:::-_-----:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-x-:-:-:----:::::::::::::::::Lv .- ILA --v=7. --_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_- --:---------:-:-:-:-.:-:-:-:-:-:-:.-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:- -:-:-:-:-:-: .14, pi"n- - ito( __ =lig --C-::::::::::::":_:_::z:::::T:z:::::::::::::::::::::::::::f -::::::::::::_, , 1 .,,._,. 1 j u, .,i,-.: t.:4.114,,. --4'. 11-- D' 12 FA 1 JE ' ' \V(.2:_,,.*---•.-. 7.:E.:::E]E::::--.::,____-,iE::::-5.--3,EgEEEEEE:7::::::;EEE:,EEEE.:1--.E_EEEEEEEEE EEEEEEEEEE-EEEE:_1/4 .1 -.-4-711,41. 0716,.), _ 1 , ol it w,,- cr, ::::::::_:_:_.::___..::::=E:::::::..5.:37...s.::::::_:E:::_.::::::::::::::::_a::::Es_:::_::::_::::::EE::::.:::::135::::.:5:_::.:_s., , J.:,1.1. 1. 1 , Fs\ -Aii.:b _ -11E1, .,_ �a �� .,--==_= -=======__ __ -_ io _ :_ _ _ iii'.3 _.m 1 ' pJ 7 _`III gi.,, 'IIy, ■ .1v w.0 ■ . . ) Y[ II MI ` .� 4 t-' ) -.. 1c. r' 1.IP:::: 111111 1 -.I. .2..../1 211 g2 Pl! li 12-9P. ' •. . ,11 • <$ 1111511111111114it:1:11• I ; • !Mk \ ) 5li,p. ..AIf.Ii tI i'lfiigt1f-:o..:. ' l\ '.t t\1.1 !' fi 1.11 ', i ' 1 ill .l �[-�..+1 0. ' .,h T-.,A, ' ■ 1,�I ggti i1t 7 1-.- ) 1 �' \ _I.u. ,.u. .,MQIl7`. _ .. .a.11 ' 1 ir- <., 1 11 .. :,0� T e�TI�u . i ■'ill -1 *- TIEVI 4._.:_ -)-HEI , iv .... i.o-ino9/ , r-___„\I . ,,k,__.- • )illugp \ /4EltifErt;;Iy oppliir, . ■-I It?,T 1:y--\_.._..,\iN\, .A _.1) ,,x,411{1V0 ..,4 ,,,,,, /(G! 7111 iligihki'---111" �>oJal itti ri , �� a7 .;-4 .A\(.., 114111.1 1111‘ \l•li _k I.1 1I .„-_,.._,, i._.-.\-...;\:-..... 4,„M.4..1.A..: AT::O r0Pi ti%Q IAli P-' I'-I i: I 'i1 t ll .Ii.i,i,i a7 I;-a; ro1 fI / 1 7 i _ olal -P.t A-or talr• _.,7 co........ she,. , lit :0°---.1410.-,w-..- 1-\-- ,./,-... . -.cm, ... LI ,,, I \'‘--)74, Oice:1\c... _ ,. ....,,,..... . ),„ CO CO 1 • ritlp kih \\\\ r, ,.........„-..... t Rii 1 — i isi‘:;"--14:1.17 1 '- ‘481r ielokil r° IllErglk 51.111 . 'Iri 111 Eir.-..':›; , pP. -- ,,'_ Pillinifillgil af l'' la -.1..-.... 4 _ F •1 • ,. 41 . . .j,. 11...; "A 7 " 6D1P ITent .1 /_ 4.,, 4 , , , ,.._. . -. Ny. ‘, _IlL ..•ai-7-1.. "- I II-11 I/1,11it) 1 I I ` i w -' �� . Intl ��I lift! —1I iI� - : . l . . Q Y a NOTE: GTE RESPONSIBLE FOR FAA LIGHTING AND PAINT SPECIFICATIONS M 12'-0' 0 4'-0'�4' —0' 4'-0'� —LIG+�TNING ROD EL. 120.0't TOP OF ANTENNA 1 2 EL. 117.96't — — — — — 1— / / 41` ANTENNA PLATFORM _ SEE A2 FUTURE CARRIER .,r Es • "^ LIt 1 Y:Aii 1 I' . ZL � � (!' i / v 9 « N _ .�.-', p4 `y •t illiPli 1 a o°� tl ti� S 9� vR. ('+Z y L • < t io. 6 .eg 0.°° .4,✓ ty •� , 0 ,, „I c, v1 O,STN •c .. . . _ ___— — _• N, y L M �a-, y�9 0 ,--1 c y , .. - -,4, I s� t cs is i k_ 4' 8 - ,„,„,I) 1' Ss •: 641.',/oh < • ,'s� r1 _lc .,,„Jr 1r 414i. &'t� ,..�-'^ • ♦-:•. If tie 0' .r'® ow. i= .m M n (' S — _ifr Q�� _ �'"' �, of z� y,G\I ,o�', 00 �. ',. , ,. f, ,/.7t70; ar d E , ,•fir.a� r1 " r. • � �� :� • ` s ; iir„,,,,,,. QNn . r�� 'vim�,.ov ,d'1+ illiiiiF • I cis Nib ,,.z IY S, ;;<<v.�,.+� Lip r1lq _ _ f ia ,t rionogigo jTIIIi°► t AliiliVir 1 frk; . g_ u w ,,,1 L f <iis Hlp1 ; . ., .. ..�1 0.1; • �� r {< ty 'dr f.P'4't , e c x IV �,�a"�11 i a a. k4 , , h• 4.. E ''. ` 4 04 j r `Oy f O. i p g.;9 N ',, A r l'. ,r it {tv , .,1 n d +`* ..4 1.,`'o 4.14. > ,,,..S . .�.i iCyl e/ !', s p 1 �S`1 ,xl� r-,}3i4- • • CVO cy 5 . � 0 4 a taa # �fi`ao s w3� �7 � i •t , if.. •a a }�� >y, .r S 1 T'x `hv¢ '�". ''y'yr9 ,,xx �`� '�,... '� Ip Z 0 , 1 S �� . R(:fir, �'�if:, r !' i, Ei M1,?� FD • • y Ir•• ( ' 1 4 ,e r ( 1' F,ar#' d .,yf9 e f . v`u i's' d'.ti • ' L7 tit tftw•iis a S V _ 3 , ,, �S,$v, , ,.r, ,.. .,,,S''.- wY, . .�.,—,. PS,rrO`^-'fie >•,. '- .-:. 01111 - IA CI • tl �Vo1•1f • ( O N ' , (. •� d * y n t''? c )`f�6+i �a,,•�•� 8 �'' gi I • ' z , :. I:t-;.)♦ ✓VA'•• (� .i mob"„-44 w y •0 •+. ik o f t p' C, s .r ,,y s ,ate. s 4- s,* , t ii il O D 2 d ,y • , ,, i4✓ -t,-'.,, :t•��"'rig vj ry, . k! ( v cl- ♦: I AS tq , -0 F' c.N. cm ''s 4 y'h,,• G s�.. ?1,6' ,•- .xin ear 1 ,x'> *' .•y z .. - ••..Mf w ♦ v tVI A ` 1 . . , ♦ v`9Z /•vs' o. ..r iV ita v, ♦ 4 OM fl° A n r R I it r : m 001 I9 z `•. .. .. {Q`4�soE c°'1 4 >t z ! . t o it- 4 i ,t I x I I_ " g . 9 o Z _ . i 0 1 . _ _ o IM ,c., ss0 ss�_a.y•... , 4F. % Q gg A. n ct . k •sir A 4 NIP .� g 1 ri � ` ff ----.„z._..:rt_......./ , i - w. i It 1. .74e .. 'rf''.c ._. • -< .,,J •t0.a.77e� Ilir. :- •sss.x -7rt sa .;:i..f..w.r. •_ . A� _._ ,, . ' . , - .re%..ro°.a».. d. (Al wa 1s) Nib VI' ..�:.. ,�� w,11=aw .ri,ss u.,. cam— feral/ la I-. • -4..� •N°YI �♦ I 'J Kr {_ / o. on n;,slc L • r..v.l 6e• ` I Y • (EX.) PRC1` E EX.) PROP. LINE (EX.) TEL FED • i �„ I EX.) LIGHT POST --- - I GROUND ELEv:19.9 ji� / // j // Li (EX_) CURB t U GUTTER, TYP. / LU (EX.) SIGN, Z TYP. � (EX.) BUILDING FOUND 4' GONG MON ✓'_ (EX) ASPHALT WM AIL t SCRIBE IN GA5E, ROAD, TYP.DOILN 05', 2/18/98, SITE BENCHMARK • •(Ex.) I BUILDING (EX.)CURB CUT Nei: (EX.)CURB (EX) FLAG(Ex.) L1CsHT POST ` • R=05� • GUT O POLE GROUND ELEv=11.9 I& c l$ r (EX) 5' DIA ROCK \ , / (EX) STAND PIPE (EXJ PRIVATE FIRE PARKING \\\ , (EX) YAULT 4r, ,, S89'09'31'E _ �! (EX) S51"IH -- /1 q -\- _ MOWN 125.01' r I ---- -- 22 1 ....j in I I 2•' -8't 2E3 - J PROJECT AREA \`,0 SEE ENLARGED \ PLAN SHEET AI I I '''.4- I I City.., , enton Department of Planning/Building/P,,.,,,., Works ENVIRONMENTAL 8, DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPAFTMENT: 'P‘av Re\gew _ ,r COMMENTS DUE: MAY 6, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA98-064,CU-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 22, 1998 CITY OF RENTON r r#'r".tmR'1 APPLICANT: GTE Wireless PROJECT MANAGER: Mark Pywell PROJECT TITLE: GTE Earlington Site WORK ORDER NO: 78376 APR 2 4 1998 LOCATION: 600 SW 10th Street �L7i�clnav UIVIb1ON SITE AREA: 600 s f. BUILDING AREA(gross): SUMMARY OF PR:)POSAL: The applicant, GTE Wireless, seeks to construct a 100' tall monopole with three antenna arrays and ground equipment. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Healt., Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE RELATED COMMENTS UJ Wie 141 - We have rei iewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional inforrpatton is needed to properly assess this proposal. 06/ l'aa-t / I Signature o Director or Authorized Representative Date DE V APP.DOC Rev.10/93 City— .:enton Department of Planning/Building/F,...,,,., Works —)EEK�77-- ENVIRONMENTAL 8, DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIpy, F 7DEP1 'ACAII REVIEWING DEP{,RTMENT: "Ft Ire. P' ue tAft ch COMMENTS DUE: MAY 6, 1998 APR 2 31998 APPLICATION NC. LUA98-064,CU-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 22, 1998 APPLICANT: GTE Wireless PROJECT MANAGER: Mark Pywell liECEIVED PROJECT TITLE: GTE Earlington Site WORK ORDER NO: 78376 LOCATION: 600 SW 10th Street SITE AREA: 600 s.f. I BUILDING AREA(gross): SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, GTE Wireless, seeks to construct a 100'tall monopole with three antenna arrays and ground equipmen:. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Hea,'h Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet of:cl.e'I Af B. POLICY RELATED COMMENTS AA '' V/f C. CODE-,RELATED COMMENTS i/d 4- We have revpawed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is..ed to properly assess this proposal. , 23/ t Si natur Director or Authorized Re, -sentative Date DEVAPP.D / Rev.10/93 City ,.enton Department of Planning/Building/P,..,,,, Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEP/RTMENT:Si„face/ (��- atix— COMMENTS DUE: MAY 6, 1998 APPLICATION NO LUA98-064,CU-A,ECF� 1 DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 22, 1998 C/ APPLICANT: GTE Wireless PROJECT MANAGER: Mark Pywell ' OcQ PROJECT TITLE: GTE Earlington Site WORK ORDER NO: 78376 LOCATION: 600 SW 10th Street g ��3 1098 SITE AREA: 600 s.f. BUILDING AREA(gross): 4. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, GTE Wireless, seeks to construct a 100'tall monopole with three anten� r;yrs and ground equipmen . "'�� A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Hea'h Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE RELATED COMMENTS k c> c e 144 Pu.e ,/ • We have reliewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to property assess this proposal. i1,I,;,/%1"l/a% � 11/2T/g8 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev 10/93 City «enton Department of Planning/Building/ , Works ENVIRONMENTAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:Ty SP0Y:rail0'V1 COMMENTS DUE: MAY 6, 1998 APPLICATION NO LUA98-064,CU-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 22, 1998 APPLICANT: GTE Wireless PROJECT MANAGER: Mark Pywell PROJECT TITLE: GTE Earlington Site WORK ORDER NO: 78376 C / � c�� ISITEAREA: 47- LOCATION: 600 SW 10th Street , ON 600 s.f. I BUILDING AREA(gross): AFP '3 �° SUMMARY OF PF OPOSAL: The applicant, GTE Wireless, seeks to construct a 100' tall monot'di64;th three antenna arrays and ground equipment A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Healtl Public Services Energy/ Historic./Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-A ELATED COMMENTS AIO d t 0 N k/ Iy -t V,r,f 00 „c.c. C. CODE-RI.LATED COMMENTS We have review ad this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additiona,information is needed to properly assess this proposal. /)/1 1(,t i-1�23// Signature of Dir3ctor or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 • Lo� S��UC\k 0. vTl6te\--c «,) 1Dc,Sce_ <Pico� s �c •. S Cc (ems =i 1/4+\"k a WO e_k 4 -like 'iss -1 __ c C �- 6'A (8:4 ckANA , s \co`\C-t Cq) w 0_0,V S - Co,,,S - r u C-E' — N o .&5)c,rA-a.. /1/k,owc /, YOK Lf ro'se — CID,., S c.`fu C 0N, C N. L( C o w.�ft C c Li — Co.�s�„l�c c��. \-buCs y(5\ cct -I am _ r 6\-- a v,re (ca,,,,,ck -i't^< 3 Li d d=, .� re) ; S GUr- - S'.-ie,t" bi cl, — v-vc, < <�, 1 Ply c (r),-kP0,14,J. dv • D CQY VF • PPP9 —� ‘‘ R I1� ✓� 1 r n ... .,i .. . > . . . - R.b.- ..J• .w •Y �w . -' . ,. .. . - \ .I. .�. ,.^.:Pi .t •,\d'.4 •-t" •4.1 ✓�.4 '•T u• T s. alyti'4.' PROJECT DESCRIPTION INTRODUCTION GTE's Personal Communication Service (PCS) is a public utility licensed to operate in Washington by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). GTE is currently designing its network in the King County and Renton areas to establish telephone service and provide wireless capacity to its subscribers. This proposal describes the scope of the proposed project by providing specific information regarding the project location, zoning, specifications, and required services. It is GTE's desire to work with the City of Renton to ensure that our project is consistent with local ordinances and zoning regulations while providing the PCS coverage that is critical for emergency,business and personal use. Project Goals The goal of the GTE PCS Earlington (WA0366) facility proposal is to provide PCS coverage for personal and emergency purposes for the commercial and residential areas immediately surrounding the project site, including Interstate 405, consistent with all policies and ordinances of the City of Renton. Application Request Plan The applicant is requesting the following: • Approval of an Administrative Conditional Use Permit pursuant to City of Renton Ord. 4689, Section 4-38-11-D, which regulates Monopole II facilities in an IM zone. DE,"[' (gyp rE:NT PI G;4` vv CITY OF RCi`1 APR21 d°'a RECEIVED 1 GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION Project Overview The applicant proposes to construct a wireless communications facility on a portion of the Ryerson Steel property located at 600 SW 10th Street. The applicant, GTE Wireless, proposes to lease approximately 600 square feet on the property. The lease area would be developed with two equipment cabinets which house radio equipment and batteries. In addition, three (3) antenna arrays are proposed to be mounted on the top of a 100' galvanized steel monopole. Each array is composed of four (4) antennas, for a total of twelve (12) antennas. GTE is in the process of securing a lease that would allow for construction and maintenance of these facilities, necessary utility connections, and provisions for access to the site. Facility Specifications • Radio Equipment Cabinets - Two cabinets are proposed for this project. Each cabinet contains radio equipment and batteries and measures approximately eight feet (8') long by two and one half feet (2.5') wide by six (6') ft tall. • Antennas - Three (3) arrays of four (4) antennas are proposed to be mounted on the roof. The monopole and antennas will be painted as directed by the City. The color after galvanization is a grey color which matches the typical Washington skyline. Each antenna is roughly five feet (5') long and six to eight inches (6- 8") wide. Please see the plan elevations for further information. • Fencing- A six foot (6') chainlink fence with three (3) strands of barbed wire will surround the facility to discourage vandalism and trespassing. GTE proposes to install privacy slats in the fence to minimize public view of the lease area and radio equipment. • Landscaping - The applicant is requesting a partial waiver of the landscape requirements. The applicant proposes to install a 5' wide landscape buffer consisting of fast growing leylandi cypress trees on three sides of the facility. The north side of the facility is already screened by existing evergreen trees. • Facility Maintenance - The facility is generally serviced once a month by one to two employees to the site for an average four (4) hour maintenance check. This check is typically for preventative maintenance purposes. In the event of a problem, a crew is dispatched to the site immediately. 2 GENERAL SITE ANALYSIS Zoning General Plan Designation The site is currently zoned IM (Medium Industrial) by the City of Renton. The applicant has submitted an application for an Administrative Conditional Use Permit and a Building Permit to be reviewed by the City Development Services Division. Existing Use The subject area is currently in use as a steel component assembly plant. The proposed telecommunications use is in an undeveloped portion of the property and will not take up any existing parking area. Access/Circulation The project site area would be accessed from Seneca Ave SW. No further road improvements are proposed. Visual and Environmental Resources Because of the line of sight nature of wireless communications, antennas are often visible to surrounding communities. However, if desired, the proposed antennas will be painted any color the city feels will minimize any visual impacts. The pole will appear grey as proposed. The proposed site is located within a industrial/commercial district of the city, and will not substantially alter any public viewsheds. Trees to the north will screen the equipment and lower portion of the monopole from that direction. GTE proposes to use privacy slats in the chainlink fence surrounding the use to minimize public view of the radio equipment. Due to the heavy commercial/industrial flavor of the surrounding properties, GTE is requesting a partial waiver to the landscape provisions of the Cit Ordinance No. 4689. The city has preliminary agreed (see Memorandum) tha t request see nable. GTE is proposing to reduce the landscape buffer to ' strip of leylandi cypress. ese trees grow extremely quickly and will rapidly fo a se erimeter aro the facility. 1 r (ct) Vv 11 ^ Site Selection This site was chosen because it represented the best available option for technical, leasing and zoning requirements. The areas in the vicinity of the project are commercial and industrial in nature, and there are no residences abutting the site. Surrounding zoning types are almost exclusively IM (Industrial) and CA (Commercial). 3 Conditional Use Criteria A. The proposed use shall be compatible with the general purpose, goals objectives and standards of the comprehensive plan, the zoning ordinance, and any other plan, program, map or ordinance of the City of Renton. The overall goal of the General Plan, as implemented through the Zoning Ordinance, is to provide an arrangement of land uses, circulation and services which will encourage and contribute to the health, safety , welfare and convenience of the people who live and work in this area. The proposed project would not be in conflict with any provisions of the Comprehensive Plan or any other city ordinance or plan and would promote public health, safety and welfare by providing wireless telecommunications services to the area. PCS mobile phones are becoming a necessary emergency service device and business tool, as well as being convenient for personal and family use. Additionally, the proposed project will not adversely affect any element of the Comprehensive Plan in that the primary use of the subject site as an industrial facility will remain unchanged. The proposed wireless telecommunications facility will be ancillary to the primary established use. No adverse impact to the character of the existing neighborhood would occur due to the construction of this PCS facility. The use will not generate any smoke, odor or other adverse impact to the adjacent land uses. It is an acceptable use and the facility is located in a non-residential zone. Being unmanned, the proposed use requires no parking, has no impact on traffic, circulation or density and will not utilize any leasable space. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) licenses all wireless telecommunications facilities, including PCS. The American National Standards Institute (ANSI) and the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) establish operational safety standards for radio frequency electromagnetic fields. The FCC currently requires cellular, ESMR and PCS providers to comply with these ANSI/IEEE standards. This installation will comply with all FCC rules and standards. B. There shall be a community need for the proposed use at the proposed location. The requested use at the proposed location will provide reliable wireless telecommunications services to the residents of Renton and the surrounding areas. The proposed site, as part of a larger PCS network, will provide improved access to wireless communications in the event of emergencies (traffic accidents, crime reporting, etc.) and natural disasters (earthquakes, fires, etc.) by providing reliable 4 wireless telecommunications in these situations. This service will be used by public safety entities and virtually any entity which must have reliable, portable communications for emergency situations. The proposed use will also provide a reliable and convenient means of communication for everyday personal and business use. After comparison of other potential site locations in the surrounding area, the Ryerson Steel property at 600 SW 10th Street offered the most desirable location in the interest of public convenience and welfare. The height of the project site will allow the antennas to be individually mounted on low poles which will serve their intended function without being unsightly or causing adverse impacts to surrounding properties. Additionally, the location and height of PCS facilities are based on technical requirements and, as such, must be placed according to those requirements. This site is critical to establishing a seamless high quality network for providing wireless telecommunications services to the region. GTE's PCS facilities will bring the communities in Renton access to new types of digital wireless communication services. These wireless services will increase the opportunities to conduct business, reach family members and assist in times of emergency. The effect of competition will likely result in lower prices and broader affordability of services. 1. The proposed location shall not result in either detrimental overconcentration of a particular use within the City or within the immediate area of the proposed use: GTE's PCS facilities will bring the communities in Renton access to new types of digital wireless communication services. These wireless services will increase the opportunities to conduct business, reach family members and assist in times of emergency. The effect of competition will likely result in lower prices and broader affordability of services Currently, GTE has an unacceptable level of service in this region of Renton. In order to remain competitive and bring the fruits of competition to the residents of Renton, GTE must be able to enhance the service to this region. Please see the accompanying system map which shows GTE facilities in and around this area. 2. That the proposed location is suitable for the proposed use: After comparison of other potential site locations in the surrounding area, the Ryerson Steel property at 600 SW 10th Street offered the most desirable location in the interest of public convenience and welfare. The surrounding land uses are composed exclusively of industrial and commercial uses and will not be negatively impacted by the presence of a 5 communication facility. Additionally, the location and height of PCS facilities are based on technical requirements and, as such, must be placed according to those requirements. This site is critical to establishing a seamless high quality network for providing wireless telecommunications services to the region. C. Effect on Adjacent Properties: The proposed use at the proposed location shall not result in substantial or undue adverse effects on adjacent property. The PCS facility will not generate noise, odor or other nuisances. Activities associated with the facility will not create any significant impacts, nuisances or in other ways disrupt the ongoing functions of the neighborhood -- the facility will typically only require one maintenance visit per month. The PCS facility will add new wireless services to the surrounding community which may assist the public and emergency service providers. The facility will use electrical and phone services that are provided adjacent to the site and will typically only require one maintenance visit per month. The facility is unmanned and will have no detrimental impact on existing utilities, transportation systems, education, police and fire facilities or social and health services, except once again perhaps to enhance the effectiveness of emergency response teams through the use of effective wireless communications. The proposed radio equipment will be screened from the view of neighboring properties by privacy slats in the proposed chainlink fence as well as a 5' landscape buffer. The equipment will meet all bulk requirements as required by the City of Renton and the pole may be painted any color to minimize the visual impacts of the use. The galvanized steel monopole will appear grey, which matches the typical Washington skyline. 6 GTE Wireless 2445 140th Ave. NE Suite 202 Bellevue, Washington 98005 April 7, 1998 Ms.Lesley Nishihira Development Services 200 Mill Avenue South Renton,WA 98055 Ref.: GTE Application for WA0366 Earlington Dear Ms.Nishihira: GTE is a strong advocate of collocation when the situation allows and we currently engineer all of our towers to sustain at least two sets of equipment. Therefore,this letter,per your request, is to confirm that GTE agrees to allow for collocation of additional Wireless Communication Facility equipment by another provider on GTE's tower at this location. The locating of another providers equipment may be placed within GTE's leased area if space permits. In addition to these provisions,GTE a will agree to remove the facility within six(6)months after the site's use is discontinued and restore the area to it's previous condition provided that a collocation has not been formed. In which case the burden of removal would be transferred to the remaining provider. Thank you very much for your time on this application and GTE looks forward to working with you. If you have any questions, please contact Kate Stephens, the Site Development Department Associate at (425)895-7053. Sincerely, orako Calcagno DE/ELO• ENT R TC;;� Manager,Site Development CITY OF Pacific Northwest PCS Region 1 AS9B APR 2. State of Washington ) ,r ''t fl King County ) REC i, Personally appeared before me,the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State and County aforesaid, Horazio Calcagno, with whom I am personally acquainted, and who, upon oath, acknowledged himself to be the Manager, Site Development of GTE Wireless,a corporation, and that in such capacity he executed the foregoing instrument for the purpose therein contained, by signing the name of the corporation. ,`totuueeeej .‘ Witness STFp'1yNitness my hand and seal of office this 7t'day of April, 1998. OTAR min�� Notary Public m the State o Washington :Z Residing at Bothell uBLtc •o •�11' ta,?••qe. F A Part of GTE Corporation • Phone 425-895-7000 • Fax 425-895-7019 CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL CHECK LIST A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project,if applicable: Earlington - GTE PCS Site WA0366 2. Name of Applicant: GTE Wireless of the Pacific, Inc. 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Applicant Contact Person Horatio Calcagno Steve Welton GTE JM Consulting Group, Inc. 2445 140th Ave NE, #202 12828 Northup Way, Suite 301 Bellevue, WA 98005 Bellevue, WA 98005 (425) 895-7000 (425) 895-1440 4. Date checklist prepared: April6, 1998 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing,if applicable): Immediately following building permit approval. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. None. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal?If yes,explain. No. 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, i f known. DEVELOPMENT ENT PLANNING Conditional Use Permit and Building Permit. CITY OF RENTON APR 21 1998 RECEIVED EVALUATION FOR TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT AGENCY USE ONLY 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) GTE proposes to construct a Personal Communication Service (PCS) facility located on the Ryerson property at 600 SW 10th Street and identified as APN 214600- 0050. The proposed facility will include three (3) antenna arrays mounted on a 100' steel monopole. Each antenna array will include four (4) PCS antennas (approximately 53" X 8" each), for a total of twelve antennas. Site development will also include two equipment cabinets, each approximately 8 ft long by 2.5 ft wide by 6 ft tall.. Please refer to the attached site plan and elevations. The site will not be accessible to the public because the site will be surrounded by fencing. There will generally be one maintenance visit per month. The facility will operate 24 hours a day, seven days a week. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The proposal will be located at 600 SW 10th Street in the City of Renton. The APN is 214600-0050. A vicinity map and legal description are included on Sheet T-1 of the plans. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes,mountainous,other: b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? flat. c. What general types of soils are found an the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. unknown soil classification. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. Unknown. GTE Wireless Earlington PCS Site WA0366 Page 2 EVALUATION FOR TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT AGENCY USE ONLY e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. The site will be scarified only for the placement of the equipment pad . f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. no. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example,asphalt or buildings)? approximately 250 s.f. of impervious surface will be added. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: None. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. There will be very minor emissions associated with vehicles delivering equipment and construction materials to the site. There are no emissions associated with project operation. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so,generally describe. None known. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or impacts to air,if any: Non' are necessary. 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what river or stream it flows into. No. GTE Wireless Earlington PCS Site WA0366 Page 3 EVALUATION FOR TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT AGENCY USE ONLY 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the site th a t would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities i f known. There will be no surface water withdrawals or diversions. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year flood-plain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharge of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. b. Ground: 1) Will groundwater be withdrawn,or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system,the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s)are expected to serve. There will be no waste materials. c. Water Runoff(including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any, (include quantities, if known). Where will the water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Project will not alter or impact the existing storm drainage system. GTE Wireless Earlington PCS Site WA0366 Page 4 EVALUATION FOR TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT AGENCY USE ONLY 2) Could waste materials enter ground surface waters? If so, generally describe. No. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: None are needed. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: __deciduous tree: alder,maple, aspen,other X evergreen tree: fir,cedar,pine,other shrubs X grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail,buttercup,bullrush,skunk cabbage, other _ water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Grasses in the lease area would be removed. No trees will be removed. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. d. Proposed landscaping,use of native plants,or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: The applicant proposes to install a 5' landscape buffer consisting of leylandi cypress on three sides of the lease area. The area to the north is already screened by existing evergreen trees and the applicant is requesting to waive landscaping on this side. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk,heron, eagle, songbirds, other:_ _________ mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. GTE Wireless Earlington PCS Site WA0366 Page 5 EVALUATION FOR TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT AGENCY USE ONLY c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife,if any: None are needed. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to complete the projects energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating,manufacturing,etc. A new electrical meter may be installed to provide power to the radio equipment. There will be self-contained batteries for emergency electrical backup. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any? None. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so,describe. No such hazards have been identified with other similar installations. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards i f any: None. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None. GTE Wireless Earlington PCS Site WA0366 Page 6 EVALUATION FOR TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT AGENCY USE ONLY 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction,operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. There will be minor short-term noise associated with the construction phase of the project. There will be no new significant noise associated with operation of the project. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts,if any: Comply with all city ordinances regarding noise. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The site is developed with a industrial assembly plant and is surrounded with industrial and heavy commercial uses. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so,describe. No. c. Describe any structures on the site. Existing assembly plant located south of the proposed facility. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so,what? No. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? IM - (Medium Industrial) f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Not known. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not applicable. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No. GTE Wireless Earlington PCS Site WA0366 Page 7 EVALUATION FOR TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT AGENCY USE ONLY i. Approximately how many people would reside or work on the completed project? None. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts,if any: None needed. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans,if any: The facility will comply with bulk zoning regulations and City of Renton Ord. 4689 which addresses wireless communications facilities. The facility will not affect the existing use of the property. The proposed telecommunications facility will be ancillary to the primary use. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high,middle, or low-income housing. None. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated. Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts,if any: None. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? The antenna array will be mounted on a monopole with a maximum height of 100' to the top of the antennas. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? No views in the immediate vicinity will be obstructed or substantially altered. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts,if any: The antenna arrays and monopole will be painted as directed by the City. The applicant proposes to leave the pole the grey color which appears after galvanization. The color tends to blend with the typical skyline. GTE Wireless Earlington PCS Site WA0366 Page 8 EVALUATION FOR TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT AGENCY USE ONLY 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? None. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts,if any: None. 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? None. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archeological, scientific,or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts,if any: None. GTE Wireless Earlington PCS Site WA0366 Page 9 EVALUATION FOR TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT AGENCY USE ONLY 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans,if any. The project is located on SW 10th Street and will be accessed from Seneca Ave SW. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Not applicable to this project. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? None. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets,not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). The proposal will not require any new or any improvements to existing roads or streets. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. This is an unmanned facility and will not require the use of water, rail or air transportation. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known,indicate when peak volumes would occur. The facility will be unmanned. One maintenance visit per month is expected. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts,if any: None. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example, fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, i f any. The equipment will be monitored 24 hours a day, seven days a week. GTE Wireless Earlington PCS Site WA0366 Page 10 EVALUATION FOR TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT AGENCY USE ONLY 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available to the site: electricity, natural gas, water,refuse service,telephone,sanitary sewer, septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service,and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Telephone service will be provided by US West. Electrical power will be provided by the local provider (Puget Power). Water, sewer and natural gas are not required for this project. C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: ---- Name Printed: Steve l� S^-�C G Date: Aei, \ ( CA GTE Wireless Earlington PCS Site WA0366 Page 11 98 -22. fNTY OF RENTON 1998 MEMORANDUM DATE: 3/joj/Clg TO: Construction Services, Fire Prevention, Plan Review, Project Planner FROM: Jim Hanson, Development Services Division Director SUBJECT: New Preliminary Application: GTE FAQ C 1 /oN S iTE LOCATION: GCC ( V\I A meeting with the applicant has been scheduled for 10:00 , Thursday, A P12 1 - in the 3rd floor conference room. If this meeting is scheduled at 10:00 AM, the MEETING MUST BE CONCLUDED PRIOR TO 11:00 AM to allow time to prepare for the 11 :00 meeting. Please review the attached project plans prior to the scheduled meeting with the applicant. You will not need to do a thorough "permit level" review at this time. Note only major issues that must be resolved prior to formal land use and/or building-permit application submittal. If you are unable to attend the meeting, please send a representative. Please submit your written comments to j-AivA Ht/ T at least two (2) days before the meeting. Thank you. DEVELOPMENT CITY OF RENTU:'d A/16 (l6'14-2A, �. ' - APR 21 1998 RECEIVED 7 L� 3$S/i -.... ...r►a .� ...o ... . ...'�. ,... i..-,a..i a,,.,..� .K. n.r . -..: r -•].' .�.. .. .. ..,. 8 -2 2.. .. _. • • t ` r0�J' 9 79 MEMORANDUM DATE: •/./ � g TO: Construction Services, Fire Prevention, Plan Review, Project Planner FROM: Jim Hanson, Development Services Division Director SUBJECT: New Preliminary Application: GTE- c4)(2- 1 N 61 C1N s ITE LOCATION: 6OC 5-w A meeting with the applicant has been scheduled for /0=00 , Thursday, APR 1 L, in the 3rd floor conference room. If this meeting is scheduled at 10:00 AM, the MEETING MUST BE CONCLUDED PRIOR TO 11:00 AM to allow time to prepare for the 11 :00 meeting. Please review the attached project plans prior to the scheduled meeting with the applicant. You will not need to do a thorough "permit level" review at this time. Note only major issues that must be resolved prior to formal land use and/or building permit application submittal. If you are unable to attend the meeting, please send a representative. Please submit your written comments to „TANA /-/i,WTe__ at least two (2) days before the meeting. Thank you. 92 -22 "Y OF RENTON MEMORANDUM ..,.��..� . iSION DATE: •3/i c TO: Construction Services, Fire Prevention, Plan Review, Project Planner FROM: Jim Hanson, Development Services Division Director SUBJECT: New Preliminary Application: GTE EA P C 1 iN(i TON c ►TE LOCATION: &CC (5-1n/ /C�`t A meeting with the applicant has been scheduled for 10:00 , Thursday, APP ( L '14 in the 3rd floor conference room. If this meeting is scheduled at 10:00 AM, the MEETING MUST BE CONCLUDED PRIOR TO 11:00 AM to allow time to prepare for the 11 :00 meeting. Please review the attached project plans prior to the scheduled meeting with the applicant. You will not need to do a thorough "permit level" review at this time. Note only major issues that must be resolved prior to formal land use and/or building permit application submittal. If you are unable to attend the meeting, please send a representative. Please submit your written comments to -TPNA /-it/FP---T at least two (2) days before the meeting. Thank you. lip /ice p ou' c.omioje-tt , G rfcii 'c'C� �v1V'� 1,110/yf �� . c'✓%Cisli�', f«ci li fles coto,l ci1� Ii�tI' 'if1i 11,4; 1-14 C .0 p . f . C< cr L c4 1 o t, I 2 3/7 CITY OF RENTON PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: April 2, 1998 TO: Pre-Application File FROM: Jana Huerter, Principal Planner SUBJECT: GTE EARLINGTON SITE -PRE-APP FILE#98-22 We have completed our review of the pre-application for the proposed GTE Monopole and antennas. Listed below and attached on several sheets are our preliminary findings. Although every attempt is made to ensure that the comments are complete, a more thorough examination of the project at the time of application submittal may reveal additional issues that may alter these comments or require additional comments. The proposal is subject to City of Renton Wireless Communications Facilities Ordinance 4689. The comments that follow reflect standards and regulations of this ordinance. Permit Requirements The Proposal is for a 100 foot monopole and three antenna arrays mounted on top of the monopole. Each array is composed of four antennas. The proposed facility will be located behind Ryerson Steel located at 600 SW 10th Street. Monopoles which are 60 feet or greater in height are classified as a Monopole II facility. Monopole II facilities may be allowed within an Medium Industrial zone (IM) with an administrative conditional use permit. Wireless communication facilities 60 feet or greater in height also require SEPA environmental review. The environmental review and conditional use permit review are concurrent and generally take about 6 weeks to complete. Refer to section 4-38-14 of the Ordinance for conditional use permit review criteria that are specific to wireless communication facilities and would be considered in evaluating the conditional use permit application. The applicant should address these criteria in a "justification" statement. Application Submittals Section 4-38-5 of the Ordinance lists submittal requirements. These requirements are in addition to, and intended to supplement, the standard submittal requirements for conditional use permits. They include a map of the view area, photosimulations, map of the service area, a detailed inventory of existing facilities within Renton city limits, site plan, landscaping plan, agreement to collocate, draft lease agreement, report describing technical design of structure, and, documentation establishing the structural integrity for the support structure. \\TS SERVERSYS2:\COMMON\-H:\DIVISION.S\DEVELOP.SER\DEV&PLAN.INGUI-I\PREAPP2.DOC\jmh March 10, 1998 Page 2 Development Standards Section 4-38-11 of the ordinance lists development standards for Monopole II facilities. The maximum permitted height is 35 feet higher than the maximum allowed height in the underlying zone, or 150 feet, whichever is less. The IM zone does not specify a maximum height therefore 150 feet would apply as the maximum height allowed. Antenna mounted on the support structure may extend an additional 15 feet in height. The Wireless Communications Facilities Ordinance requires a minimum 15-foot wide landscaped area surrounding the facility. The applicant has requested a modification from the required landscaping to allow instead, only 5 feet of landscaping and a 6 foot high chain link fence with privacy slats to minimize public view of the equipment. Since the site is surrounded by industrial uses and located in an area with existing natural landscaping, this request seems appropriate. The modification must be approved by the Administrator. The request for modification must be submitted with the land use application and accompanied with supporting materials. The submitted site plan illustrates the proposed facility approximately 7 feet from the north property line. It is unclear whether the location will be considered along the street frontage of Seneca Ave. SW. If the proposed facility is within this location, a 15 foot setback from the street would be required. c: • .1 Consulting Group, Inc. TEL E C O M M UN ICATIONS GTE Wireless of the Pacific, Inc. Service Area The attached Radio Frequency (RF) propagation study is a computer modeled study of predicted coverage from a monopole placed at the proposed site on the Ryerson Steel property. The model takes into account much of the surrounding topography including significant trees hills and buildings to predict the level of service which can be expected after the installation is complete. The map has been color coded to express the decibel level prediction for areas surrounding the site. Other sites in the GTE network have been mapped in (note: Sites WA0146 and WA0057 were NOT mapped), and the coverage which results from these sites has also been plotted. The goal of GTE Wireless is to achieve a decibel level of -80 or higher (towards zero). This level of coverage will allow the user of a handheld set to receive reliable coverage inside a building or car. As you can see from the propagation map, the area which surrounds the project site is predominately red and yellow, which represents coverage levels between -85 to -100. This is a significant and unacceptable level of coverage, especially on heavily traveled transportation corridors in downtown Renton and Interstate 405. In fact, some areas to the northwest of the site have no coverage at all. The proposed Earlington (WA0366) site will alleviate most of these coverage gaps and GTE to pursue virtually seamless wireless coverage in the areas in and around Renton. DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON APR 21 1998 RECEIVED Bellevue Office: 12828 Northup Way,Suite 301 • Bellevue,WA 98005-1932 • Telephone:(425)895-1440 • Fax:(425)895-1441 Earlington [WA0366B] Coverage Objective cr4MTT4CORF1Afl1r GRANE'T Ver 2.4 `\ �1\'.`::.,�,\, \, i\\ \ , •'•'\y \4 + .:\ •:J ) .1:W .• 1L ,+\ M titi /2 • \' \ `L �; .,. : ; : .',X::h: . .;\ .titi; ALL:>}:.. fil'.. .-10110"'"'"wigir UTM zone 10 •`'�� \. 0.: }��\�\,'\• � � \��4.• - ::ti ;.'•: �•$':is '.. 4 :L �� + \, \'. ," '` ,\\ `\\`\\>; ;w + '-};<:;<:,.;': User ID: seadb x....i:\.\-m--, :.. •• \�, \ `\�` �L ,. \� :� : # ' \`\� `� \4. Thu Apr 9 06:17:351998 .::fit' .:•+ „ ..'::'L\ •\' \ \• \., +?\\ .`'•.. ' \ :`2 � T.: .\ , , ��y4::..: :,,::+titi,:;:,•. .,+4•.ti ?• 4:�•o, \\\\ \. �� . ``�� `:'ti��•' :}i4\•:.?: {. t{ •} .. . \,,)\;::: \'\\ j.... '�'\^. '' ?\'\;•`.�.:,\;:.•titi\\ 4::.+, ti." : \V: �\ g;`�•:;:<„:•?: •••' �, ••�w•}::?! <:}` • Signal Strength[dBm] n + titiii .4\.4 .;•titi •.... ... •vim\, y •::{ti? ..\.;+;::;} - ':'::Y•. v. ::, sw .. v::ti .:•x}}::: .. `.:' •'i.:r: '�`'.• 1,`:{v :iii, '••'•,\'•}T, :.: ..;. :•} +v'`�r .v • :: ..:•: ,::• +s., � ::. :..;.. •}::titi?:: , • .. '.v': \\• :••\.:.i 'i�:i}': BELOW-100 •••••titi:;::., >:: �p • -90 to-85 {::. a `� \\>�:.' �` .`' \ \ ' .? l -85 to-80 rip 1 t R Aft :ti.: • °: > :: \ , \�\ L,yyyq :. : k.:' ` i ABOVE-80r �/ , _ •:ti ...titi L,1':'.'',•::•ti::ti:•'^ ',\,' X. \,` '\ \\ • :4 `'•. ;, \\^,\Ly '''L''.'`^L`,:• 1; :'^.\{:;.'\} • \i • .::.c';::':;�:s.,: `•;i ,+��••.��, :; titi \, L yy ti iM;::. >:,,�,\\v;; ..:;.ti:.,*, ALLENTOWN'. a•}. \..\i:3i•::.: .\'{ :•::rat?' ... % \A4•, r i •:\ �,} ?,.,:•'.. ":s,%:f \,tiv.L4 :i � titi;; \'j' ,••.-:•,"•::,\.•t.,,s.,L"1::.—:":,'&t:ii:./i:.„o*:,''::k„.:%—'..„"::',:...•:..••:•\•:•. \ ifs {}\::; '�\.:,:j'�'t '::ti;.•,y'v., 1 kA.. \':?::�tii:::::':' •.k,l� \\ •, 29 N #� ::.; ..: ;.}\. } .. :•h .\. •••4,V 4•.titi:..{, r .:::.:.::..•'....::.•..,..:.:..;,•:i:.,"...::•.:.•-:.•s:"::.::...,I..:,r:!i.•.;V..::•,f::::•..,:..:•<.:..::•...:.•.:••...::S.;..:.:.;:6i"::,L:.:•:1:••••::•...:.•,.•,•:..::.•i.:,.:;...::.•:.•'..:.:1.•i,:iK••.g•...ii-'..•.,4.-•:..•":-•.:'••.''':..i•1-:::..:::i1,a,:,st.i!.1.;?::.:;i...:•:.4••::i1...:i•:..•:..•.:i•:„i.$,':''.:..'„.•.•.'••.I..•‘'.:.•.1•.•.Q:•:'.:.::..,••.:.:..,.,::s:::.C.. :.? ::::..:... ... .. ::: :1 .. .... .,........... ... ..: / :'}\\•., \ : :,,ti• L,''• titi\• ';::.•.;• \L,: :•t•:%.:V•:,„•'.:\%'•'.I:,..„:....,.•.N...•'..k.iI•-:.:.ys:.:.,*".,•.".,,,I••,"•./,„:,k::..k,%:..:\::.\:',..)••:1:,::::-N.:.::::..:.•..•,.....:,...••...:\\K1,.:••.:••.i,•.:.i;•'i§•:i„ss'*•,\:.':.. ::••:•i;:•:••::::i•:::s'.•:::.•.i'i:..':§:,:i..::,,.k.•:.,.::..„::."::.,%:::-..:::k,:..::,..I:...r„.ZIx:.it•:4•*V:t.1.*:•.":.•0......:..:.....' .s:.sk..I...,.'s.•„.I..\.::I:,d•.:.::-.i.:--:::':•,:„•':*:,:;:.:.*•..••..V•,•:..•s••,1•••,:f::,:i::*i:i*:ii::!::•:::•:,i•:••,::•ii•::':•i„,::,::•:%:::•:ft;.::..-•:**,:'•••,•:•':•,.•.*i.,§.,•••:%1k::.•i::i.i:i?:Z:•i.:§:m...i:.'.l:::.:•:::•:,:::.—::•Z••:i•,.••.::•.•:::;.::,..•Z0:::s.:"§*..:q•.::§:::..:::•:i:*..::::':i•,.•.:::::-•..i•:;::::•.:'::i•:'.-::i,..:.:•:•‘••.:*:•„.•':::,:;:•10:i::i:••"i:••:.•i::::::.;:::::.;::•.,.::::•.1:-.,::-:":14:.•::-:.i.:V::%-:•::ri•„::di.::*,\*::•i::.:.::..:•:..:'„::„.::.:.:L::..,:.,..:4:„,,::.....i.i.••::i.:.:.i::.V:r:i...ii:/:•:.,:.%.•:ti::..::::sL%Zii•„:•i:'4:•.:';:.::.::-:,.:s•:.::.:•:y...:•s i2...::$•,.,:••sr•k.:ss•,•..:::••:,.:ik..:•:*.:.%•. I..:•..i•.,::.-..s.:4.:::•.•..•.,.i•:::...•..,#::-:.,::,,..::i:..:k,..‘„::i:.::.:1"..,.i.:.:...•.:..::.:. \ \ • `{'•`- \titi'''' :`\,\\ \•\'•• ::.;,,'``.., \\ `'''\\.. \: \' • „w::':k7,k :..sL:..:::....::.:.,.::.•..:.....- titi . AV +.:,. `\\+tiR't•. :':..\ L'\ `,\:• :`•''+! '#: / \ X1x+ ��,� ^ x ,: ,:;v'•}. :: titi • #i# , ` ; \.:::;•::i.,•L,,..',•• '�! .: i, ,: ..• . . .\;:-1 ..f :::. '\,i;:,'y •titi,v'..10 :::: ?::: ;' ;?\ WA03KO_EAflLN6TON .L.:.^,•,..,:;:y. •'' �'\':`2:'t r +.,"`\ r4••, :;}? . .: ,ti}. :.r i \ �.,� ... ,ti,»:f.•ri. ..}\:i;:::::•::?!:'{:;:titi ^: ,,.., �'•\•. '. }:•+}ti: .:: .`:ti}:.•i:v? ;{'\.; \ +rs YH\. ,{}titi••;?•• }•,........... �, • q {�4 v: . ......:: .. .:{•.:::tin;•. ::. .v:•;. ` '.:.,:::};•• ,.y..y. \}\.} .,:........:. .:.:::: . , :.• . ... ..... ....... .. \•.: *titi 1�ti ::{y�•\ >f. 1L\.} .11. wAmr anrERroe Mars ........:.,:•.•:.•:: .} .�::::: .::.•: � ::::•., ... . :,� :>^.;: . :.':; ::;;:•::: ; 3g.4• .•..•..: tiCtiw\:.: ter:: :: ....:titi:'::i'> \•.\1}.tir. .:.}•.}•:. .. }\:::' \ •. :• \•, •• \r+ \.. .. `- n, „• .[ {.};i;. : 1 tin. iv::<:i2i +YM «t•tiv.\\h\\ti\'4.\\ 1. \ ?LL'' \::•::v::i:} -.r.... '''''.-,• \+..•••: •.%: ... \; •• 6R'0`". •.• - .......:.\.'\:\+`44',;1,* ti.: :,\• : k ,::,L1.} .\.; •••*; .L,,,•. + { A. • \. ....::::: 10 ..:....., ..� .:: ..: .:;+:+•.•::•:::..:>•r•. : \ \.., \�\,.,... \!,.% . �'� Scale 1:31 680 ti. • y., i:�'::'''!titi:ri:::�:..4 ,a \\ ,� \' ..:., 4.^,•:+4\i:.;:;•}'•}}}:,•.}., ti;}{•.}}}}:,?�•\.,....,titi:::::;. , ::\.};?.:i:. \,��-�.".,+�`• 7r _ _ _ `•\\``•\'\� ��\�\\\\...`'�� x `w\:',•.•; ;.?.L.,,�.,}.;;........ \ \\^... Jt, ,''; •'` ..... .... .,,,,\\�,,,a»,.»\., � • i I lily v v L. V.d V.b ; ,.•.r. \. .:. 'titi::': .v,:\.,.. \w., •• .. \. y;:',: v• fin, k,• • 4 tiv. 1 :::,.• titi::;:::. }.J}}' r.i':}. .::., .. .;,k :... , .: : .. .. .}: ..•.:�,•:.}.:•... !tin:.:•.,:.::::::., • #.\::>.: ; `':\\\\'{} \,,•...L • } , •.» .. h`,',;.,:• :',`\''ti ti:: ,.;.}•,}y..}' •}:;}•::^,::.,w.:::}:y::.,..v.•:• .. • ,''4 "tN\ .\:+.:?..,, ...,*: 1 I I 1 r. ••:•.. al? w :\ ?•. ;ti:.} \ . .. :::,.:.•:.\ .. : • `i;jLk ; • \;> ?,• ;:�}. \•. km 0 0.5 1 v vti+;�;yL:'Lti\titi• •+ • • •ti, •\\ }•", is,ti •:; k ,\ ::ti r.' '± ti:?:.:}:•;'.•:v `},,??:•}nL?titi. , ti'• ;<'V\ '•} 4.'•:: :�:•ti • •: v t •\• '•'.i{.\:++ .:tibtiti r•:\4: : .4•ti` • ; :titi;.\}1 1::v.}:\'�t]:::;{:/r. 1 ti+!'';;\L'?' :#;iii:':'•titi'\' .\ .•'::\}.:`.ti< •,•:\ ` +};' ^\`: :,„,•,:• ...... .j.iii An'ti,: �'\�: '•4.,,ti\ ,. LLB, \• '`'^,•. + \\• `.;�;.. l`+\'4'•`}•:'ht '!, i. i ......•• —� GTE Wireless-Seattle 122 17 W 122 16 W 122 15 W 122 14 W 122-13 W 122 12 W 122 11 W 122 10 W 2821 Northup Way, Suite 200 Bellevue,WA 98004 „ � / \-74:77 S 4 tLa i 41,.. 5f , ., . 7::: -- - 4 * CURRENT #4 VIEW a . ` s i 1 r ..e. 47 4:ic __ . , , • . Willi , 1 I . NS 7:..:4 ow--4- F i i 1)4: ,” .Ay PROPOSED WA0366 EARLINGTON FROM GRADY WAY LOOKING NW r • • �i ... • Y! t+ • • ©'.";• • ]' �' �; 1 ,s41 : I� CURRENT VIEW # 1 • r ■ • m. Ott - F '111 PROP OS ED WA0366 EARLINGTON LOOKING SOUTH FROM SENCA/SW 7TH 1 '; I sf• i,_ till- iM ii lea . . , ow;al . 4 , NO. -4 . 1 ' • lar :101411,040• . - +•did A. V`- _ Tr CURRENT #2 VIEW ; 4j4 •1i, i gar !!ii - I P II \ 1 . (1:7 \-• ' -.- . PROPOSED WA0366 EARL NGTON LOOKING EAST FROM OAKESLAKE DRIVE t e • '' 40 Ryerson , " 4 as /vuaWNIN Tll / • .1 'P." t.��'•.I r . .1 am - �.,�, �# �y CURRENT #3 v I EW v .A.Ameal j 12ycrson lital: i .—...../ iri. PROPOSED WA0366 EARLINGTON LOOKING N FROM SW 10TH CITY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION LIST OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS within 300 feet of the subject site PROJECT NAME: c GM ear-Io -km S7'C. APPLICATION NO: LW • 96• o(o'f CO -q , EC. 1 The fcllowing is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. The Development Services Division will notify these individuals of the proposed development. NAME_ ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER S� F✓�—TT� t�-1 E 4 c , RR HJMA)i NYJIAAM. mita ir3AIgX,i 140I2, ;MMOO G CITY OF RENTGN APR 21 1998 RECEIVED (Attach additional she , if necessary)viyJ RAm istasxt i401ZZA1MO3 (Continued) NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER Applicant Certification I, S tom- V>� LA)IEEL-Ze•-.) , hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property (Print Name) owners and their addresses were obtained from: ❑ City of Renton Technical Services Records Cam. Title Company Records ❑ King County Assessors Records Signed " Date 4(7-( // (Applicant) NOTARY ATTESTED: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington, residing at ,Q p on the fday of CEjy,L,( , 19 56- . (A(Notary Public) MAMILYN KAMt.t1trr $$ li:Xi Ctty of Renton Use**** CERTIFICATION.OF MAILING C„ y v�u ereby certify that notices of the proposed',application were mailed to City Employee) each listed property owner on. '�' , . {7$ Signed ' Date: 4 23 18 NOTARY: ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Nota Public, in and for the,State 'of Washin ton residing at +sL on the 3 day of �;#� , 19'1 Iistprop.doc REV 07/95 MARILYN KAMCHEFF 2 COMMISSION EXPIRES 6Ia M FIR. AMERICAN TITLE - SEATTLE FARM PACKAGE Page 1 Prepared for: J & M CONSULTING GROUP, STEVE WELTON 04/15/98 Prcl: 192305-c030-02 Use: 503-IND-WHSE SqFt: 18 , 740 Date: 96/05/16 Name: ST GERMAIN TRUST QSTR: NW-19-23-05 LdSz : 31, 360 Sale: TRUST Tel#: Zoning: IM Styl: Bd: Deed:W Typ: Site: 865 LIN) AV SW RENTON, WA 98055 Bths: F T H Loan: Mail: 9 CRESCENT KY Assessd: 624 , 300 Tax: 8702 . 72 AFN: 960612-0702 City: BELLEVUE WA 98006 %Imp: 69 . 8 Yr: 1972 Un: Mkt: R2 WF/V: Legal: LOT 192305 BLK 30 POR OF NW 1/4 OF NW 1/4 BEG S 89-10-25 E 762 . 32 Prcl: 192305- 9056-01 Use: 504-IND-WHSE SqFt: 47 , 544 Date: 92/07/21 Name: EASTLAFE INVESTORS QSTR: NW-19-23-05 LdSz : 2 . 76 Sale: $1. 461M Tel#: Zoning: IM Styl: Bd: Deed:W Typ: Site: 501 SW 7TH ST RENTON, WA 98055 Bths: F T H Loan: Mail: PO BOX 700 Assessd: 1. 4676 Tax: 20469 . 38 AFN: City: MERCER ISLAND WA 98040 %Imp: 50. 8 Yr: 1967 Un: Mkt: R2 WF/V: Legal: LOT 132305 BLK 56 PORS NW 1/4 OF NW 1/4 & OF TR 17-18 RENTON SHORE Prcl: 192305-9061-04 Use: 504-IND-WHSE SqFt: 40, 640 Date: 96/04/19 Name: THORNEERG PRISCILLA J QSTR: NW-19-23-05 LdSz : 1 . 57 Sale: ESP-- Tel#: Zoning: IM Styl: Bd: Deed:Q Typ: Site: 715 LAND AV SW RENTON, WA 98055 Bths: F T H Loan: Mail: 4201 NE 41ST ST Assessd: 1. 3325 Tax: 18573 . 96 AFN: 960429-0125 City: SEATTLE WA 98105 %Imp: 69 . 1 Yr: 1968 Un: Mkt: R2 WF/V: Legal: LOT :L92305 BLK 61 POR OF NW 1/4 OF NW 1/4 BEG S 89-10-25 E 762 . 32 Prcl: 192305-9062-03 Use: 503-IND-WHSE SqFt: 15, 015 Date: 91/11/22 Name: FORTE RONALD M+JACQUEL QSTR: NW-19-23-05 LdSz : 1. 58 Sale: $440, 000 Tel#: Zoning: IM Styl: Bd: Deed: E Typ:MTG Site: 955 LIND AV SW RENTON, WA 98055 Bths: F T H Loan: $645, 000 Mail: PO BOX 816 Assessd: 589 , 100 Tax: 8222 . 93 AFN: 920605-0019 City: RENTON WA 98057 %Imp: 29 . 6 Yr: 1968 Un: Mkt: R2 WF/V: Legal: LOT 192305 BLK 62 POR OF NW 1/4 OF NW 1/4 BEG S 89-10-25 E 762 . 32 Prcl: 192305-9078-05 Use: 263-OFFC BLD SqFt: 24 , 000 Date: 95/11/13 Name: RADO'IICH JOHN C+CAROL QSTR: NW-19-23-05 LdSz : 1. 61 Sale: $925, 000 Tel#: Zoning: CA Styl: Bd: Deed:W Typ:MTG Site: 451 SW 10TH ST RENTON, WA 98055 Bths: F T H Loan: $250, 000 Mail: 2000 124TH AVE NE Assessd: 900, 000 Tax: 12552 . 33 AFN: 980302-1995 City: BELLEVUE WA 98005 %Imp: 53 . 2 Yr: 1979 Un: Mkt: R2 WF/V: Legal: LOU 192305 BLK 78 POR FORMER BN RR & PUGET SOUND ELECTRIC RR R/WS Prcl: 192: 05-9084-07 Use: 932-VAC-IND SqFt: Date: 97/03/10 Name: RADOVICH JOHN C & CARO QSTR: NW-19-23-05 LdSz : 1. 16 Sale: $250, 000 Tel#: Zoning: CA Styl: Bd: Deed:W Typ:MTG Site: 501 SW 10TH ST RENTON, WA 98055 Bths: F T H Loan: $220 , 000 Mail: 200 ) 12TH AV NE #B103 Assessd: 277 , 900 Tax: 3884 . 56 AFN: 970311-0424 City: BELLEVUE WA 98005 %Imp: Yr: Un: Mkt: R2 WF/V: Legal: LOT 192305 BLK 84 LOT 3 OF CITY OF RENTON SHORT PLAT NO 138-81 REC Prcl: 192305-9087-04 Use: 263-OFFC BLD SqFt: 18 , 680 Date: 90/05/01 Name: JOFNSON LIEBER INC QSTR: NW-19-23-05 LdSz : 1. 16 Sale: QTCLM Tel#: Zoning: CA Styl: Bd: Deed:Q Typ: Site: 72 SW 10TH ST RENTON, WA 98055 Bths: F T H Loan: Mail: PO BOX 9723 Assessd: 1. 3567 Tax: 18905. 95 AFN: City: RENTON WA 98057 %Imp: 79 . 5 Yr: 1983 Un: Mkt: R2 WF/V: Legal: L)T 192305 BLK 87 LOT 2 OF CITY OF RENTON SHORT PLAT NO 138-81 REC Information provided is deemed reliable, but is not guaranteed Copyright 1998 EXPERIAN CORP. FIRM AMERICAN TITLE - SEATTLE FARM PACKAGE Page 2 Prepared for: J & M CONSULTING GROUP, STEVE WELTON 04/15/98 Prcl: 214600-0010-09 Use: 506-IND-WHSE SqFt: 136, 800 Date: 84/11/30 Name: PACIFIC NORTHWEST GROU QSTR: NE-24-23-04 LdSz : 5 . 67 Sale: $3 . 600M Tel#: Zoning: IM Styl: Bd: Deed:W Typ: Site: 710 THONIAS AV SW RENTON, WA 98055 Bths: F T H Loan: Mail: 3131 S VAUGHN WAY STE Assessd: 3 . 9891 Tax: 55594 . 38 AFN: City: AURORA CO 80014 %Imp: 62 . 8 Yr: 1969 Un: Mkt: R2 WF/V: Plat: EARLINGTON IND PARK 1 Lot: 1 Block: Prcl : 214600- 0030-05 Use: 506-IND-WHSE SqFt: 127 , 500 Date: 94/07/25 Name: W R INVESTMENT QSTR: NW-19-23-05 LdSz : 4 . 73 Sale: TRUST Tel#: Zoning: IM Styl: Bd: Deed:Q Typ: Site: 705 SW 7TH ST RENTON, WA 98055 Bths: F T H Loan: Mail: 515 11iTH AVE NE STE 2 Assessd: 3 . 8671 Tax: 53876. 19 AFN: 940801-0988 City: BELLEVJE WA 98004 %Imp: 67 . 9 Yr: 1969 Un: Mkt: R2 WF/V: Plat: EARLINGTON IND PARK 1 Lot: 3 Block: Prcl: 214600-0040-03 Use: 503-IND-WHSE SqFt: 24 , 592 Date: 95/12/26 Name: THOAME FAMILY LP QSTR: NW-19-23-05 LdSz : 1. 40 Sale: PTNSP Tel#: Zoning: IM Styl: Bd: Deed:Q Typ: Site: 838 SENECA AV SW RENTON, WA 98055 Bths: F T H Loan: Mail: 3407 N WASHIGNTON Assessd: 1. 1092 Tax: 15463 . 07 AFN: 951229-0629 City: TACOMA WA 98407 %Imp: 66 . 8 Yr: 1985 Un: Mkt: R2 WF/V: Plat: EARLINGTON IND PARK 1 Lot: 4 Block: Prcl: 214600-0041-02 Use: 505-IND-WHSE SqFt: 70, 418 Date: 90/06/12 Name: KNO CORPORATION QSTR: NW-19-23-05 LdSz : 3 . 32 Sale: $3 . 050M Tel#: Zoning: IM Styl: Bd: Deed:W Typ: Site: 601 EW 7TH ST RENTON, WA 98055 Bths: F T H Loan: Mail: 601 SW 7TH ST Assessd: 3 . 0801 Tax: 42928 . 88 AFN: City: RENTON WA 98055 %Imp: 71. 7 Yr: 1974 Un: Mkt: R2 WF/V: Plat: EARLINGTON IND PARK 1 Lot: 4 Block: Prcl: 214610-0030-03 Use: 504-IND-WHSE SqFt: 34 , 560 Date: 94/10/20 Name: RECREATIONAL EQUIPMENT QSTR: NE-24-23-04 LdSz : 1. 29 Sale: $1. 215M Tel#: Zoning: MP Styl: Bd: Deed:W Typ: Site: 813 THOMAS AV SW RENTON, WA 98055 Bths: F T H Loan: Mail: PO BOX 1938 Assessd: 1. 0078 Tax: 14046. 47 AFN: 941028-2139 City: SUMNER WA 98390 %Imp: 66 . 4 Yr: 1974 Un: Mkt: R2 WF/V: Plat: EARLINGTON IND PARK 2 Lot: 3 Block: Prcl: 214610-0033-00 Use: 506-IND-WHSE SqFt: 110, 320 Date: 94/12/22 Name: EARLINGTON LTD PRTNRSH QSTR: NE-24-23-04 LdSz : 4 . 30 Sale: $850, 000 Tel#: Zoning: MP Styl: Bd: Deed:W Typ:MTG Site: 933 THOMAS AV SW RENTON, WA 98055 Bths: F T H Loan: $2 , 650, 000 Mail: 907 THOMAS AVE SW Assessd: 3 . 2169 Tax: 44835. 15 AFN: 950112-0740 City: RENTON WA 98055 %Imp: 65 . 0 Yr: 1974 Un: Mkt: R2 WF/V: Plat: EARLINGTON IND PARK 2 Lot: 3 Block: Prcl: 242304-9025-03 Use: 532-IND-SVC SqFt: 4 , 196 Date: 81/05/63 Name: SYSTEMS CONTROL INC QSTR: NE-24-23-04 LdSz : 1. 00 Sale: $174 , 24C Tel#: Zoning: MP Styl: Bd: Deed: Y Typ: Site: 805 SW 10TH ST RENTON, WA 98055 Bths: F T H Loan: Mail: 8656 154TH AVE NE Assessd: 378, 000 Tax: 5283 . 73 AFN: City: RE')MOND WA 98052 %Imp: 30 . 8 Yr: 1982 Un: Mkt: R2 WF/V: Legal: L)T 242304 BLK 25 LOT 1 OF CITY OF RENTON SHORT PLAT NO 138-81 REC Information provided is deemed reliable, but is not guaranteed Copyright 1998 EXPERIAN CORP. • FIRoi AMERICAN TITLE - SEATTLE FARM PACKAGE Page 3 Prepared for: J & M CONSULTING GROUP, STEVE WELTON 04/15/98 Prcl: 242304-9113-06 Use: 901-VAC-RES SqFt: Date: Name: PUGET SOUND POWER & LI QSTR: NE-24-23-04 LdSz : 31, 200 Sale: Tel#: Zoning: MP Styl: Bd: Deed: Typ: Site: 900 SW :;RADY WY RENTON, WA 98055 Bths: F T H Loan: Mail: PO BOX 90868 Assessd: 171, 600 Tax: 15. 04 AFN: City: BELLEVUE WA 98009 %Imp: Yr: Un: Mkt: R2 WF/V: Legal: LOT 242304 BLK 113 A STRIP OF LAND IMMEDIATELY S OF & ADJ THE R/W Information provided is deemed reliable, but is not guaranteed Copyright 1998 EXPERIAN CORP. Trust St Germain Investors Eastlake Priscilla J Thornberg 9 Crescent Ky PO Box 700 4201 NE 41st St Bellevue WA 98006 Mercer Island WA 98040 Seattle WA 98105 Ronald M Forte John C Radovich JOHNSON LIEBER INC PO Box 816 2000 124th Ave NE PO Box 9723 Renton WA 98057 Bellevue WA 98005 Renton WA 98057 PACIFIC NORTHWEST GROUP R Investment W Family Lp Thoams 3131 S Vaughn Way Ste 20 515 116th Ave NE Ste 25 3407 N Washignton Aurora CO 80014 Bellevue WA 98004 Tacoma WA 98407 KNO CORPORATION RECREATIONAL EQUIPMENT EARLINGTON LTD PRTNRSHP 601 SW 7th St PO Box 1938 907 Thomas Ave SW Renton WA 98055 Sumner WA 98390 Renton WA 98055 SYSTEMS CONTROL INC PUGET SOUND POWER & LIG 8656 154th Ave NE PO Box 90868 Redmond WA 98052 Bellevue WA 98009 11, NOTICE OF APPLICATION PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DATE: April 23,1998 A Master Application has been fled and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NUMBER/NAME: GTE Earlington Site LUA-98-064,CU-A,ECF DESCRIPTION: The applicant,GTE Wireless,seeks to construct a 100'tall monopole with three antenna arrays and ground equipment. GENERAL LOCATION: 000 SW 10th Street STUDIES REQUIRED/OR AVAILABLE: PUBUC APPROVALS: Environmental Review Administrative Conditional Use Building Permit Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Mark Pywell,Project Manager,Development Services Division,200 Mill Avenue South,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on June 8,1998. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail,contact Mark Pywell at(425)277.5588.Anyone who submits wdllen comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified W of any decision on this project. PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION DATE OF APPUCATION: April 21,1998 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPUCATION: April 22,1998 DATE OF NOTICE OF APPUCATION: April 23,1998 ,f11. 44, I. ' ''-l'f-t14'.- ;-' IS14:1?::. el: .., ,.,\\\_..... 9. ,i S C f L r yr—. ""-". - uENMALOT.DO0 CERTIFICATION I, SA-vd-ii IA\0 h vh. , hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document were posted by me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on ri 1 21 ,‘'11 Signed: cSc t ATTEST: Subcribed and sworn before me, a Nortary Public, in and foci the State of d Washington residing it ii—ri , on the L-/�'' day of )YL /�1 yQ `------rh 11..ht:jj cf---.1-4-1,1._due MARILYN KAMCHEFF COMMISSION EXPIRES 6/29/99 r 1 - •0 NOTICE OF APPLICATION PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DATE: April 23,1998 A Master Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NUMBER/NAME: GTE Earlington Site LUA-98-064,CU-A,ECF DESCRIPTION: The applicant,GTE Wireless,seeks to construct a 100'tall monopole with three antenna arrays and ground equipment. GENERAL LOCATION: 600 SW 10th Street STUDIES REQUIRED/OR AVAILABLE: PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review Administrative Conditional Use Building Permit Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Mark Pywell, Project Manager, Development Services Division, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055, by 5:00 PM on June 8, 1998. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail,contact Mark Pywell at(425)277-5586.Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION DATE OF APPLICATION: April 21, 1998 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: April 22,1998 DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: April 23, 1998 CEO 4 1 l :arc VIV' '•! 17 ,I /' .i • "I I/' ; y %/ i'' 1 1 ' L I ' a 1 .. c7: / . 4 -1' , ,, � 4 .""' t C\if . iilp, \' h I f ;4'4 ` �iiti ',' r t .,1 I i - s t. _` - .. � � - 4 •�•+ , :•toter i � 5 t � �1r r - • GENMALOT.DOC •• Ty= CITE , OF RENTON th YI= Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator April 23, 1998 Horazio Calcagno GTE Wireless of the Pacific, Inc. 2445 - 140th Avenue NE, #202 Bellevue, WA 98005 SUBJECT: GTE Earlington Site LUA98-064,CU-A,ECF Dear Mr. Calcagno: The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on May 19, 1998. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. Please contact me, at 277-5586, if you have any questions. Sincerely, 01;d1/7e",..—: Mark R. Pyw I ICP Project Ma, ger cc: Joseph T. Ryerson/Owner Steve Welton/JM Consulting Group ACGPTZTT1 DOC 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer Mk/IL- d 12-16 I N AI CITY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION MASTER APPLICATION PROPERTY OWNER(S) PROJECT INFORMATION Note: If there is more than one legal owner, please attach an additional notarized Master App ication for each owner. PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: NAME: g-y S�N $T 4_ GTE Wireless PCS -- Earl i ngton - WA0366A Joseph T. Ryerson PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION: ADDRESS: 30 W. Monroe Street 600 SW 10th Street CITY: ZIP: KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): Chicago, IL 60603 APN 214600-0050 TELEPHONE NUMBER: EXISTING LAND USE(S): APPI.ICANT (if other than owner) Steel Fabrication/Assembly Plant PROPOSED LAND USES: NAME: Horazio Calcagno Telecommunications Facility COMPANY(if applicable): EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: GTE Wireless of the Pacific, Inc. Unknown ADDRESS: PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): 2445 140th Ave NE, Suite 202 N/A CITY: ZIP: EXISTING ZONING: Bellevue, WA 98005 IM (Medium Industrial ) TELEPHONE NUMBER: PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): (425) 395-7000 CONTACT PERSON N/A DEVELOPMENT PLANNING SITE AREA (SQ. FT. OR ACREAGE): CITY OF RENTON NAME: APR 21 1998 Mr. Steve Welton 600 S.F �y n RECEIVED TiQtQP,'1�'(i1 applicable): � PROJECT VALUE: •'. c,ocsulting` Group $70,000 ADDRESS: IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? 12828 Northup Way Suite 301 No CITY: ZIP: WA 98005 IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALL`r Bellevue, SENSITIVE AREA? TELEPHONE NUMBER: No (425) 882-7472 or (206) 992-1682 LEGAL DESCRIP IN OF PROPERTY (Attach separ sheet if necessary) ` Lot 5 -- Earlington Industrial Park No. 1 , According to the plat thereof in Volume 83, Page 10, records of King County, Washington (Per First American Title Insurance Company Order No. 369243-2) TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES Check all application types that apply--City staff will determine fees. _ANNEXATION $ SUBDIVISION: _ COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT $ _ REZONE $ _ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ _ SPECIAL PERMIT $ SHORT PLAT $ TEMPORARY PERMIT $ _TENTATIVE PLAT $ x(X CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ /Oc ,— _ PRELIMINARY PLAT $ SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ _ FINAL PLAT $ GRADE & FILL PERMIT $ (NO. CU. YDS: 1 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ _ VARIANCE $ (FROM SECTION: ) _ PRELIMINARY _ WAIVER $ FINAL _ WETLAND PERMIT $ — ROUTINE VEGETATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ _ BINDING SITE PLAN $ SHORELINE REVIEWS: SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ _ CONDITIONAL USE $ VARIANCE $ _ EXEMPTION $No Charge XX ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $_ .00. REVISION $ AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I, (Print Name). uV arOIJ , declare that I am (please check one) the owner of the property involved in this application,X(the authorized representative to act for the property owner(please attach proof of authorization), and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to befor �a.No pit ►J it nd Steve Welton, JM Consulting Group, Inc. h �(�e State of � /% residing at;' ci'/ Z '�J.t� t (Name of Owner/Representative) , on the filai$f °nand - n , . (Signature of Owner/Representative) ,$.�d��p ��.• ( ignature kNo lic) ♦i 08'p 0 ♦♦wfuInno%%�� (This section to be completed by City Staff) City File Number; it_c3-r �`P A AAD .'BSP .CAP-S CAP-U CPA • CU-H l ...LLA MHP .FPUD FP PP R RVMP SA-A ;:SA-H . SHPL-A SHPL-H SP SM SME TP» V-A V-B ''V-H W TOTAL FEES: $ 15 , --- TOTAL POSTAGE PROVIDED: $ MASTERAP.DOC REVISED 8/97 ffiggic •3a- Consulting Group, Inc. TELE 0 NlNIU VIC: ATIONS OWNER/AGENT AUTHORIZATION I do hereby authorize GTE Wireless Products and Services and its authorized agent JM Consulting Group, Inc., to act as "Applicant" in the processing of all applicable applications, permits, and other related activities associated with the processing and construction of a Personal Communication System (PCS) facility in the City of Renton, on the property described below: APN: 214600-0050 Address: 600 SW 10th Street Property Owner/Company Officer;_. gefeci/--- ,62,6 Signature Title: qe,{6,. ,D y1,f f /76/q Date: 4 /3 DEVELOPMENT PLAN.\11NG CITY OF RENTON, APR 21 1998 RECEIVED Bellevue Office: 12828 Northup Way,Suite 301 • Bellevue,WA 98005-1932 • Telephone: (425)895-1440 • Fax:(425)895-1441 Consulting Group, Inc. TELECOMMUNICATIONS Landscaping Attached please find some photographs of the proposed area of installation. The photographs show the existing evergreen buffer between Ryerson and the commercial structures north of the property. GTE proposes to utilize this buffer to screen it's radio equipment from the north side, and is asking for a partial waiver from the landscaping requirements on this facility. The basis for this request is that 1) the adjoining properties are entirely commercial or industrial in nature and there are no parks or viewsheds which would be obstructed by the placement of this facility, and 2) The existing evergreens will be able to screen the facility from the north side. GTE proposes to install a 5' wide landscape buffer which will further screen the proposed facility. Opite RFh PR2Z �s. � RFcEi 1/ L Bellevue Office: 12828 Northup Way,Suite 301 • Bellevue,WA 98005-1932 • Telephone:(425)895-1440 • Fax:(425)895-1441 •i \ 1 Consultingg Grou Inc. \ " •`�`� TELECOMMUNICATIONS 4 ' ,M '‘, • 4111 Loot, a 6 Se -rbw,LOs s rrt r , )40 • 4' Ot IS%wg • tawt t+v r, +' r • �v s . , 1-4�1• , , • .. j� • 4 •1 weigio4 E ertwooaO stare Bellevue Office: 12828 Northup Way,Suite 301 • Bellevue,WA 98005-1932 • Telephone:(425)895-1440 • Fax:(425)895-1441 GTE Wireless of the Pacific, Inc. City of Renton Site Inventory WA0148 Sunset Address: 2806 NE Sunset Blvd , Renton WA 98056 Type: Monopole Height: 6 0 ' WA0206 Hazen Address: 11224 138th Ave SE , Renton , WA 98056 Type: Monopole Height: 12 0 ' WA0366 Earlington Address: 600 SW 10th St , Renton , WA Type: Monopole Height: 100 ' WA0085 Kennydale Address: 1616 NE 30th St . , Renton , WA Type: Monopole Height: 701 WA0057 Lake Kathleen Address: 3929 NE 4th St . , Renton , WA 98056 Type: Monopole Height: 50 WA0091 Renton Address: 405 Logan Avenue N , Renton , WA Type: Rooftop Height: 57 ' 6 " to top of antenna from grou d_ 1 evel 12 ' above rooftop �Ev O='MENT '::1G CITY OF RENTON APR 21 1998 RECEWED GEOTECHNICAL REPORT GTE Mobilnet WA0366-B/ Earlington 600 SW 10th Street Renton, Washington ppti, R�-to GrN APR 2 1 11* Project No. T-3903-1 R GG \1Q a a L 3 Terra Associates, Inc. Prepared for: JM Consulting Group, Inc. Bellevue, Washington March 16, 1998 TERRA ASSOCIATES, Inc. Consultants in Geotechnical Engineering, Geology and Environmental Earth Sciences March 16, 1998 Project No.T-3903-1 Ms. Diana Fenn JM Consulting Group, Inc. 12828 Northup Way, Suite 301 Bellevue, Washington 98005-1932 Subject: Geotechnical Report GTE Mobilnet WA0366-B/Earlington 600 SW 10th Street Renton, Washington Dear Ms. Fenn: As requested, we have conducted a geotechnical engineering study for the subject project. The attached report presents our findings and recommendations for the geotechnical aspects of project design and construction. Our subsurface exploration encountered alternating layers of medium dense fine sand, silty fine sand, and sandy silt and soft silty clay to depths of about 18 feet, followed by medium dense to very dense sand and sandy gravel. Based on these soil conditions, the monopole antenna can be supported on drilled pier foundations extending into the dense to very dense sand and sandy gravel. We trust the information provided in the attached report is sufficient for your current needs. If you have any questions or require additional information,please call. Sincerely yours, TERRA ASSOCIATES, INC.g-----4L--;— Ranga Devulapally J. Project One 4:5Cy E ��, 7 16 s ; —3 1 C • TlSeodore J. Sche a+s ,".E. ti Principal Engineer % 7 4 12525 Willows Road, Suite 101, Kirkland, Washington 98034 • Phone (425) 821-7777 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. 1.0 Project Description 1 2.0 Scope of Work 1 3.0 Site Conditions 1 3.1 Surface 1 3.2 Subsurface 3.3 Groundwater 2 4.0 Discussion and Recommendations 2 4.1 General 4./ General Grading and Soil Strength Parameters 2 4.3 Equipment Room Foundation 3 4.4 Monopole Drilled Pier Foundation 4 5.0 Additional Services 5 6.0 Limitations 5 Figures Vicinity Map Figure 1 Schematic Exploration Location Plan Figure 2 Appendix Field Exploration and Laboratory Testing Appendix A (i) Geotechnical Report GTE Mobilnet WA0366-B/ Earlington 600 SW 10th Street Renton, Washington 1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project will consist of the placement of a monopole cellular communications antenna. An equipment storage room will be constructed adjacent to the monopole tower. The approximate location of the site is shown on the Vicinity Map, Figure 1. Plans for the antenna were not available at the time of our study. However, we understand that the monopole antenna will be about 100 feet high. A typical monopole foundation consists of a four to six- foot diameter drilled concrete pier. We expect that transient overturning loads on the monopole structure will result in moderate lateral loads imposed on its foundation. The recommendations in the following sections of this report are based on our understanding of the above design features. If actual features vary or changes are made, we should be informed and requested to review them in order to modify our recommendations, as required. 2.0 SCOPE OF WORK On March 6, 1998, we drilled two test borings at the site to depths of 34 feet and 14 feet below existing surface grades. Using the soil information obtained, we performed analyses to develop geotechnical recommendations for project design and construction. Specifically, this report presents the findings of our field investigation and addresses site preparation and tower foundation design considerations. 3.0 SITE CONDITIONS 3.1 Surface The site is located north of the Ryerson Steel building at 600 SW 10th Street in Renton, Washington. The approximate location of the proposed antenna is shown on the Schematic Exploration Location Plan, Figure 2. An office building and associated parking lot exist north of the proposed site. The ground surface at the site is level and covered with grass. March 16, 1998 Project No.T-3903-1 3.2 Subsurface The subsurface soils consisted of medium dense fine sand, silty fine sand, and sandy silt and soft silty clay to depths of about 18 feet, followed by medium dense to very dense sand and sandy gravel. Wood pieces were encountered in the sand and sandy gravel layers between 18 and 27 feet below grade. The Boring Logs in Appendix A provide a detailed description of the subsurface conditions encountered. The approximate locations of the borings are shown on Figure 2. 3.3 Groundwater Groundwater was encountered in the borings at a depth of about seven feet below grade. Upon completion, groundwater was noticed at depths of 7.5 to 8 feet below grade. It is likely that groundwater seepage levels will fluctuate seasonally. Seepage levels are expected to be highest during the wet winter and spring months (October through May). 4.0 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4.1 General Although design loads are not available, we expect that the tower will impose moderate overturning loads on the drilled pier foundation. The native dense to very dense sand and sandy gravel soils, encountered below a depth of 23 feet, should provide suitable support for the anticipated tower loads. Specific parameters for foundation design are presented in the Monopole Drilled Pier Foundation section. 4.2 General Grading and Soil Strength Parameters If needed, the existing inorganic near-surface soils may be used for site grading; however, these soils contain a significant amount of fines (silt and clay size particles) and may be difficult to compact if they are too wet or too dry. For site structural fill, if needed, we recommend importing a granular fill soil that meets the following grading requirements: U.S.Sieve Size Percent Passing 3 inches 100 No. 4 75 maximum No. 200 5 maximum* *Based on the 3/4 inch fraction Page No. 2 March 16, 1998 Project No. T-3903-1 Structural fill should be placed in uniform loose layers not exceeding 12 inches, and compacted to a minimum of 95 percent of the soils' maximum dry density, as determined by ASTM Test Designation D-698 (Standard Proctor). The moisture content of the soil at the time of compaction should be within two percent of its optimum, as determined by this same ASTM standard. Based on data obtained from our field exploration, we recommend using the following soil unit weight and shear strength parameters for the soil units encountered and for structural fill: Soil Strength Parameters: Unit Weight Cohesion Friction Angle Depth Soil Description pounds per pounds per (degrees) (feet) cubic foot square foot (pcf) (psf) 0 to 4.5 Medium dense silty fine SAND 110 0 32 4.5 to 7.0 Soft mottled brown and gray 125 300 0 silty CLAY 7.0 to 9.5 Medium dense fine SAND 115 0 32 50 (submerged) 9.5 to 13.5 Very soft to soft gray silty 125 200 0 CLAY 60 (submerged) 13.5 to 18.0 Medium dense clayey SILT, 120 0 32 silty SAND and sandy SILT 60(submerged) 18.0 to 34.0 Medium dense to very dense 135 0 38 SAND and sandy GRAVEL 70 (submerged) Structural Fill 130 0 36 4.3 Equipment Room Foundation We expect the equipment room foundations will be lightly loaded, carrying less than 1,000 pounds per foot. Continuous strip foundations constructed on the natural medium dense silty fine sand are judged suitable for support of the proposed equipment room. Careful probing and visual observations should be made during construction to make sure foundations are not constructed on any fill soils. For foundations bearing on the natural medium dense silty fine sand, we recommend a maximum net allowable soil bearing pressure of 1,500 pounds per square foot(psf). Page No. 3 March 16, 1998 Project No. T-3903-1 Trench footings (earth-formed footings) may not be suitable in the natural sand soils due to the potential for caving and sloughing of these materials. Rather, the footing excavations may have to be sloped back and the footings formed in these soil conditions. The wall foundations should be situated a minimum of 1.5 feet below final site grade for protection against frost heave during normal winters. Also, for bearing capacity considerations, the footings should be at least 16 inches wide. Foundation settlement of one inch and less should be expected. 4.4 Monopole Drilled Pier Foundation The monopole antenna may be supported on a drilled pier foundation. We recommend the bottom of the pier bear in the dense to very dense sand and sandy gravel encountered below a depth of 23 feet. The drilled pier can be designed for the allowable end bearing capacity listed below. Additional load carrying capacity and resistance to uplift forces will be provided by soil friction against the pile shaft. The ultimate lateral capacity of the drilled pier can be determined by considering the passive earth pressure resistance to the applied lateral force. Recommended values for these parameters are given below: Allowable End Bearing': 10 tons per square foot(tsf) Allowable Shaft Frictionb: 2 to 13.5 ft: 200 pounds per square foot (psf) Below 13.5 ft.: 750 psf Allowable Lateral Resistanceb: 300 pounds per cubic foot(pcf) (equivalent fluid) Notes: a Minimum tip elevation of 23 feet below existing grade. Value includes safety factor of two. b Value includes safety factor of 1.5. The upper two feet of soil should be neglected to account for seasonal variations in soil properties. The horizontal subgrade modulus (Kh) will increase linearly with depth in cohesionless and soft cohesive soils, and can be calculated using the following relationship: Kb = nh (z/d) Where z = depth below surface d = pier diameter and nh = horizontal coefficient of subgrade reaction Page No.4 March 16, 1998 Project No.T-3903-1 We recommend the following values for nh 0 to 9.5 feet: 10 tcf(tons per cubic foot) 9.5 to 13.5 feet: 2 tcf 13.5 to 23 feet: 15 tcf Below 23 feet: 30 tcf Due to their cohesionless nature and the high groundwater table, the sands and sandy gravels will likely cave into an open drilled shaft. Therefore, the contractor should be prepared to case the hole or use appropriate slurry methods to prevent its collapse during drilling. To prevent heave of the bearing layer, if cased, the water level in the shaft should be maintained and appropriate construction techniques used to construct the pier below the groundwater level. 5.0 ADDITIONAL SERVICES Terra Associates, Inc., should review the final design and specifications to verify that our recommendations have been properly interpreted and incorporated into project design and construction. We should also provide geotechnical services during construction to observe compliance with the design concepts, construction specifications, and recommendations. This will allow expedient changes if subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated. 6.0 LIMITATIONS We prepared this report in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering practices. This report is the property of Terra Associates, Inc., and is intended for specific application to the GTE Mobilnet WA0366-B/Earlington project in Renton, Washington. This report is for the exclusive use of JM Consulting Group, Inc., and their authorized representatives. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. The analyses and recommendations presented in this report are based upon data obtained from the on- site test borings. Variations in soil conditions can occur, the nature and extent of which may not become evident until construction. If variations appear evident, Terra Associates, Inc., should reevaluate the recommendations in this report before proceeding with construction. Page No. 5 Commercial114 trailers/ loose storage _r TO SCALE 0 Commercial I I OXIMATE BORING LOCATION driveway/parking LAN IS SCHEMATIC. ALL LOCATIONS ;IONS ARE APPROXIMATE. THIS SITE R REFERENCE PURPOSES ONLY AND NOT BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION OR 'POSES. Commercial SCHEMATIC EXPLORATION LOCATION PLAN GTE MOBILNET WA0366-B/ EARLINGTON RENTON, WASHINGTON Proj. No.3903-1 Date FEB. 1998 Figure 2 APPENDIX A FIELD EXPLORATION AND LABORATORY TESTING GTE Mobilnet WA0366-B/Earlington Renton,Washington On March 6, 1998, we investigated subsurface conditions at the subject site by drilling two hollow-stem auger soil borings to depths of 34 feet and 14 feet below the existing grades using a truck-mounted drill rig. Soil samples were obtained at regular intervals in accordance with ASTM Test Designation D- 1586. Using this procedure, a two-inch O.D. split-barrel sampler is driven into the soil using a 140- pound hammer. The number of blows required to drive the sampler 12 inches after an initial 6-inch set is referred to as the Standard Penetration Resistance Value (N value). This is an index related to the consistency of cohesive soils or the relative density of cohesionless soils. The N values associated with each sample interval are listed on the Boring Logs,Figures A-2 and A-3. The boring locations were approximately determined in the field by measuring with a tape from known landmarks. The approximate boring locations are shown on Figure 2. An engineer from our firm monitored the field exploration. Our representative classified the soil conditions encountered, maintained a log of the borings, obtained representative soil samples, and performed a surface site reconnaissance. All soil samples were visually classified in the field in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System described on Figure A-1. Representative soil samples obtained from the boring were placed in closed containers and taken to our laboratory for further examination and testing. The testing program consisted of determining the moisture content of each sample. The results of the moisture content tests are shown on the Boring Logs. Project No.T-3903-1 MAJOR DIVISIONS LETTER TYPICAL DESCRIPTION SYMBOL Clean GW Well-graded gravels, gravel-sand mixtures, little or no GRAVELS Gravels fines. J2 (less than Poorly-graded gravels, gravel-sand mixtures, little or O cn N More than 5% fines) GP no fines. 07 �'v) 50% of coarse Silty gravels, gravel-sand-silt mixtures, non plastic a) fraction is Gravels GM Silty w Q) larger than No. with fines Z E•N 4 sieve GC Clayey gravels, gravel-sand-clay mixtures, plastic fines. c o N Clean 0 S SANDS Sands SW Well-graded sands, gravelly sands, little or no fines. 0 ILI C Z (less than Poorly-graded sands or gravelly sands, little or no c More than 5/° fines) SP fines. Om 50% of coarse o " fraction is SM Silty sands, sand-silt mixtures, non-plastic fines. U 2 smaller than Sands No. 4 sieve with fines SC Clayey sands, sand-clay mixtures, plastic fines. cn Inorganic silts, rock flour, clayey silts with slight J . O SILTS AND CLAYS ML plasticity. O cu Nup CL Inorganic clays of low to medium plasticity, (lean clay). E o (3) Liquid limit is less than 50% O o Z.N ) OL Organic silts and organic clays of low plasticity. Z oas0) Q C- 8 MH Inorganic silts, elastic. O as 2 a� �' SILTS AND CLAYS 15 CH Inorganic clays of high plasticity, fat clays. z 0 ai Liquid limit is greater than 50%LL2 OH Organic clays of high plasticity. HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS PT Peat. DEFINITION OF TERMS AND SYMBOLS Standard Penetration T 2" OUTSIDE DIAMETER SPLIT Q Density Resistance in Blows/Foot I SPOON SAMPLER cc O Very loose 0-4 2.4' INSIDE DIAMETER RING SAMPLER o Loose 4-10 OR SHELBY TUBE SAMPLER Medium dense 10-30 z Dense 30-50 1 WATER LEVEL (DATE) Very dense >50 Tr TORVANE READINGS, tsf Standard Penetration Pp PENETROMETER READING, tsf gConsistency Resistance in Blows/Foot DD DRY DENSITY, pounds per cubic foot U Very soft 0-2 LL LIQUID LIMIT, percent o Soft 2-4 I._ Medium stiff 4-8 PI PLASTIC INDEX _' Stiff 8-16 Very stiff 16-32 N STANDARD PENETRATION, blows per foot Hard >32 UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM \``�.��\\\\ TERRA GTE MOBILNET WA0366-B/ EARLINGTON paris ASSOCIATES RENTON, WASHINGTON Geotechnical Consultants Proj. No. T-3903-1 Date MAR. 1998 Figure A-1 Boring No. B-1 Logged by: RD Date: 3/6/98 Approximate Elev. Consistency/1 Q (N) Moisture Soil Description Relative Depth E Blows/ Content Density (ft.) ft. (/o) 4 inches brown sandy topsoil. Brown silty fine SAND, moist, - some staining noted. (SM) Medium Dense - 10 39.0 - Mottled brown and gray silty CLAY, — 5 some sand.(CL) Soft _ = 4 46.3 Brown and gray fine SAND,some Medium - silt,wet. (SP) Dense - I 21 29.6 Gray silty CLAY,some sand. (CL) Very — 10 T Soft to 0 51.6 Soft I 47.6 Gray and black,alternating layers of clayey Medium - 8 36.9 SII T with sand to sandy SILT(M1) Dense 15 T BIacK silty SAND to sandy SILT, Medium - some wood pieces,thin layers of Dense - 17 31.7 organics,wet. (SM/ML) Black fine to medium SAND,some - I 13 21.1 wocd pieces,wet. (GP) Medium —20 Dense Black sandy GRAVEL,some silt,some 33 16.8 wood pieces,wet. (GP) Dense L 25 Black fine to coarse SAND, some L gravel. (SP) 68 18.1 Very 30 Dense E Sandy GRAVEL at 33.8 to 34.0 feet. I 48 16.3 Boring terminated at 34 feet. Groundwater seepage observed at 8 feet. BORING LOG TERRA GTE MOBILNET WA0366-B/ EARLINGTON t��`wooli ASSOCIATES RENTON, WASHINGTON Geotechnical Consultants Proj. No. T-3903-1 Date MAR. 1998 Figure A-2 Boring No. B-2 Logged by: RD Date: 3/6/98 Approximate Elev. Consistency/ De (N) Moisture Depth Soil Description Relative P E Blows/ Content Density (ft.) ft. (%) 4 inches brown sandy TOPSOIL. Brown fine SAND,with silt to silty fine SAND, some staining noted, _ moist. (SP/SM) Medium Dense 9 42.1 Mottled brown and gray silty CLAY, 5 some sand. Soft 3 44.7 Brown and tan fine SAND,some silt, moist to wet. Medium Dense 17 20.2 10 Gray silty CLAY,some sand. (CL) Soft 1 41.3 Some clayey SILT layers and some _ sand seams encountered at 12.5 to 14 feet. 7 39.7 Boring terminated at 14 feet. Groundwater seepage observed at 7.5 feet. BORING LOG TERRA GTE MOBILNET WA0366-B/ EARLINGTON tRise ASSOCIATES RENTON, WASHINGTON Geotechnical Consultants Proj. No. T-3903-1 Date MAR. 19981 Figure A-3 DEVELOPMENT p ,�iNG CITY OF REN oNr OPTION AND LEASE AGREEMENT APR 21 1995 FOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS SITE RECEI\/ED THIS OPTION AND LEASE AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is any of its obligations under this Agreement,Tenant shall have entered into as of the_day of January 1998,by and between the right to extend the Initial Term for five (5) additional Joseph T. Ryerson&Son.,Inc., a subsidiary of Ryerson Tull,Inc., a periods of five(5) years each ("Extended Terms") on the same corporation ("Landlord"), and GTE Wireless of the Pacific terms and conditions as set forth herein, except for an Incorporated., a Delaware corporation ("Tenant"). Landlord and adjustment in Rent. Extensions shall be automatic unless Tenant agree as follows: Tenant gives written notice to Landlord of its intent not to extend the Lease. Notice shall be provided not less than thirty This Agreement provides: (1) an Option to lease certain (30)days prior to the expiration of the then current Term. property in favor of the Tenant,and(2)terms and conditions of the Lease resulting from the exercise of the Option. Paragraphs 2 c) Holding Over. If, after the end of the last Extended through 21 shall apply without limitation during the term of the Term, Tenant remains in possession of the Leased Premises Lease in the event the Option is exercised. During the Option without executing a new Lease, the Tenant shall become a Period the following paragraphs only shall be operative:1 ("Option"), Tenant on a month-to-month basis on the same terms and 6 ("Access and Utility Easements"), 7 ("Insurance"), 8 conditions of this Lease. Tenant shall pay monthly Rent in the ("Termination"), 10 ("Survey"), 13 ("Assignment/ Subletting"), 14 amount which was payable during the immediately preceding ("Consent and Approvals"),15("Debt Security"),16("Environmental month. Laws"), 17 ("Notice"), 18 ("Non-Disclosure"), 19 ("Indemnity"), 20 ("Memorandum of Agreement/SNDA")and 21("Miscellaneous"). 3. RENT, During the Initial Term Tenant shall pay to Landlord an annual sum of 41.511111.111.1111.0111.1.1111.0111.1.10., 1. OPTION: In consideration of the receipt o 'Rent"), in equal monthly installments off 11111.1.11111.11111111.111111("Option Money"), and subject to the on the first day of each conditions set forth herein, Landlord hereby grants to Tenant an month at the address designated in Paragraph 18. If the option ("Option") to lease a portion of real property owned by Commencement Date is a day other than the first day of a month, Landlord,which property is located at 600 SW 10th Street, Renton, the Rent for that month shall be prorated. Upon the WA 98055,and has a tax parcel ID number of 214600-0050-00. The commencement of each Extended Term, the annual Rent for each property subject to this Option("Lease Premises")is described and Extended Term shall increase by ten percent (10%) over the annual depicted on Exhibit"A",which is attached hereto and incorporated rent paid for the immediately preceding Term. Rent for each into this Agreement. The Leased Premises constitute a portion of Extended Term shall be payable in equal monthly installments in real property owned by the Landlord ("Landlord's Property")which advance on the first day of each month. is described and depicted in Exhibit "B", attached hereto and incorporated into this Agreement. The Option is for the purpose of 4. TITLE AND OUIET POSSESSION: Landlord represents, allowing the Tenant a suitable period of time to determine the warrants and covenants to Tenant as follows: (1) Landlord is seized feasibility of constructing and operating a telecommunications with good,marketable,and fee simple title to the Leased Premises facility on the Leased Premises. The Option shall exist for a period of and to any areas of Landlord's Property containing easements or six (6) months ("Option Period") commencing on the Date of rights of access as provided for in Paragraph 6, (2) any Execution of this Agreement. The Date of Execution is deemed to be encumbrances that may exist on the Landlord's Property or the the date upon which the last party to this Agreement has signed it. Leased Premises will not interfere with the Tenant's intended use of The Tenant has the right to extend the Option Period for six (6) the Leased Premises,(3)Tenant is seized and possessed with a valid months by paving to leasehold estate in and to the Leased Premises and that Tenant shall Landlord ("Additional Option Money") prior to expiration of the have the quiet and peaceful enjoyment of the Leased Premises at all Option Period. During the Option Period,Tenant and its contractors times during this Lease,and(5)Landlord will at all times during the shall have the right of access to enter upon the Landlord's Property term of this Lease defend title to the Leased Premises against all and Leased Premises to conduct,at Tenant's expense, such surveys, claims. tests and investigations as are necessary to enable Tenant to determine whether it desires to exercise the Option. If the Tenant 5. USE The Leased Premises will be used by the Tenant for the does not exercise the Option,any money paid to Landlord shall be purpose of operating a personal communications service ("PCS") retained by the Landlord in full accord and satisfaction of all facility. In order to enable the Tenant to do this, Tenant may obligations of the Tenant hereunder and neither party shall have construct improvements and install equipment reasonably required any further obligation to the other under the Agreement. In by Tenant for this use. Such improvements and equipment may addition,the Lease as provided for hereunder shall be considered to include, but are not limited to a telecommunications structure, be of no force and effect without further action by either party. tower, or antenna(e), a building(s) to house equipment, electrical 2. TERM(�F i.FAS$� meters,electrical generators,coaxial transmission lines, transmitters, receivers, accessory devices, a chain link fence (to enclose all improvements), and all other equipment, supplies or materials a) Initial Term. In the event Tenant exercises the Option, relating to the foregoing. All of the above equipment, materials and the Initial Term of the resulting Lease shall be for a period of structures shall collectively be referred to as "Communications five(5)years,commencing upon written notification by Tenant Equipment". Tenant, or its contractors, assignee(s)or subtenant(s), to Landlord ("Commencement Date"). Subject to the may replace, repair, modify and remove the Communications automatic renewal provisions in Subparagraph 2(b)below,the Equipment as necessary to operate the Leased Premises. Tenant Lease shall terminate one day before the fifth (5th) annual agrees to use the Leased Premises in such a manner which will not anniversary of the Commencement Date ("Initial Term"). unreasonably disturb the occupancy and use of Landlord's Property Tenant's obligation to pay Rent shall begin on the by Landlord or any current or future tenants. Tenant will resolve Commencement Date. any technical interference problems, at Tenant's expense, with existing and future equipment used by Landlord on Landlord's b) Extended Terms. Provided Tenant is not in default of Property. 01/13/98 Site No.:WA0366 - Ryerson Site 1/9 Landlord's Property or the Leased Premises sufficient in 6. ACCESS AND UTILITY EASEMENTS: Landlord agrees to Tenant's determination to render the Leased Premises grant Tenant and/or Tenant's designee (including Tenant's utility unsuitable for Tenant's continued use. company) the rights of ingress and egress for vehicular and/or pedestrian access together with the right of access to install and g) Upon thirty (30) days written notice to Landlord,if it is maintain utility service to the Leased Premises over and upon determined that the Leased Premises or Landlord's Property Landlord's Property and any additional adjoining lands owned by is/are contaminated with Hazardous Substances, as defined in Landlord which are necessary to construct, operate and maintain Paragraph 16, such that the presence of the contamination the Leased Premises. The granting of such rights shall be at no materially and adversely affects Tenant's ability to continue to additional charge to the Tenant. The routes of access for operate its Communications Equipment. pedestrian/vehicular traffic and utility installation shall be of sufficient size to permit the Tenant to construct, operate, and Upon termination,neither party shall have any further obligation to maintain the Communications Equipment. Such rights shall be the other;PROVIDED,HOWEVER, that if Tenant terminates this granted for the duration of the Lease. Tenant shall have the right, Agreement pursuant to Subparagraphs(c) or(d) more than ninety but not the obligation, to improve such access routes, subject to (90)days from the date Tenant exercises its Option,Tenant shall pay Landlord's approval which shall not be unreasonably withheld. Landlord a lump sum payment equal to six (6) months' Rent. Tenant shall remove its Communications Equipment from the At the request of Tenant, Landlord agrees to execute easement Leased Premises no later than One Hundred Eighty (180) days documents or other written instruments ("Easements") prepared at following the date of termination. Upon termination, Tenant agrees Tenant's expense and in a form recordable in the State of to restore the Leased Premises to its original condition, normal wear Washington which reflect the above rights. The Tenant may record and tear excepted. such Easements at its expense. 9. TAXES: Tenant shall pay annually within sixty (60) days of 7. INSURANCE: For the duration of this Agreement, Tenant demand an amount equal to any increase in real estate taxes paid by shall maintain comprehensive general liability and property liability Landlord but only to the extent any increase is attributable to insurance with liability limits of not less than One Million improvements made by Tenant to the Leased Premises. Tenant shall ($1,000,000)for injury to or death of one or more persons in any one not be responsible for any interest,penalty or late charges caused by occurrence, and Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500,000) for Landlord's failure to pay in a timely manner. Tenant reserves the damage to or destruction of property in any one occurrence. right,at its own cost,to contest the validity of any such increase Landlord shall be named as an additional insured,as its interests may attributable to Tenant's improvements on the Leased Premises. appear. 10. SURVEY; A surveyed description of the Leased Premises shall 8. TERMINATION: This Agreement may be terminated as be furnished by Tenant to Landlord at no cost either during the follows: Option Period or subsequent to the Commencement Date. Such description shall be appended to this Agreement as Exhibit "A-1" a) Fifteen (15) days after receipt of written notice from and shall constitute the determinative description of the Leased Landlord if Tenant fails to cure a default for the payment of Premises inlieu of any different description of the Leased Premises Rent; contained in Exhibit A. b) Thirty(30) days after receipt of written notice by either 11. LION-INTERFERENCE; Landlord will not grant a lease, party if the other party defaults and fails to cure such default license, or easement or transfer or convey any other interest in within that thirty(30) day period,or after a longer period in Landlord's Property upon which the Leased Premises are located or order to diligently complete a cure, as long as the cure was in any other property owned by Landlord contiguous to the commenced within the thirty(30)day period; Landlord's Property which would in any way adversely affect or interfere, in Tenant's reasonable but sole discretion, with the c) Thirty(30)days after receipt of Tenant's written notice to operation of the Communications Equipment. Landlord that a governmental approval, permit or license which is necessary for the construction and/or operation of the 12. FIXTURES: Notwithstanding any contrary provision of law, Communications Equipment cannot be obtained, or is revoked, Landlord agrees that the Communications Equipment and any other denied, or overturned or, if Tenant in its sole discretion, improvements placed on the Leased Premises by the Tenant shall determines that the cost of obtaining or retaining such remain the personal property of the Tenant, shall not be considered government approval,permit or license is cost prohibitive or to be affixed to the Landlord's Property and shall be removed by commercially unreasonable; Tenant as provided herein. Tenant agrees to save Landlord harmless from claims or liens imposed upon the Leased Premises in d) Thirty (30) days after receipt of written notice to connection with any alterations or improvements to the Leased Landlord if Tenant in its sole discretion determines at any time Premises made by Tenant,its agents or its contractors. that it desires to discontinue utilization of the Leased Premises for any reason whatsoever; 13. ASSIGNMENT/SUBLETTING: Tenant may assign and sublet the Leased Premises without the prior consent of the e) Immediately upon written notice from Tenant if the Landlord to any entity controlling,controlled by or under common Communications Equipment are destroyed or damaged to such control with the Tenant,to any party which acquires substantially all an extent that its ability to continue operation is materially and of the assets of the Tenant to any entity licensed by the FCC to adversely affected. All rights and obligations of the parties shall operate a wireless communications business,or to any entity which cease as of the date of such damage or destruction. Tenant acquires substantially all of the Tenant's assets in the Metropolitan shall be entitled to a pro rata reimbursement of any prepaid Trading Area("MTA") in which the facility is located, PROVIDED Rent. Notwithstanding the above, Tenant may elect to THAT, in all such instances such assignee assumes in full all of continue in possession in which case all Rent shall abate until Tenant's obligations under this Agreement. Except as set forth the Communications Equipment are restored to the condition above,Tenant may only assign or sublet the Leased Premises with immediately prior to such damage or destruction; Landlord's prior written consent, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. f) Immediately upon condemnation of all or a portion of the 01/13/98 Site No.:WA0366 - Ryerson Site 2/9 . 1 • 14. CONSENTS AND APPROVALS: Tenant shall,at its expense, apply for all governmental approvals and other permits and 18. NON-DISCLOSURE; As a material pre-condition to Tenant authorizations which are required for the construction and entering into this Agreement, Landlord agrees not to disclose or operation of the Communications Equipment. Landlord agrees to otherwise disseminate the terms of this Agreement to any third cooperate with Tenant in all respects in connection with such party without the prior written consent of Tenant. efforts. Landlord agrees to sign any applications and registrations which require Landlord's signature. Tenant reserves the right to file 19. INDEMNITY: Landlord and Tenant each indemnifies the appeals or protests from any adverse decision of governmental other against and holds the other harmless from any and all costs bodies affecting Tenant's occupancy and use of the Leased Premises. (including reasonable attorneys fees) and claims of liability or loss Tenant reserves the right to challenge the validity of any ordinance, which arise under this Agreement as a result of the acts or omissions law or regulation affecting the Tenant's use or occupancy of the of the indemnifying party. This indemnity does not apply to any Leased Premises. Landlord agrees to cooperate with Tenant in such claims arising from the sole negligence or intentional misconduct of efforts. the indemnified party. 15. DEBT SECURITY: Tenant may, upon notice to Landlord, 20. MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT/SNDA; Landlord and mortgage or convey this Agreement (together with all of the Tenant agree,following the execution of this Agreement, to execute Tenant's rights,title and interest herein) by deed of trust or other a short form of memorandum of this agreement suitable for instrument adequate for the purpose of securing a bona fide recording in the State of Washington,a copy of which is attached indebtedness,PROVIDED THAT, no such mortgage or conveyance hereto as Exhibit"C". Tenant, at its sole expense, shall have the nor any foreclosure thereof, nor any purchase thereunder, shall right to record the memorandum in the county where the Leased impair or abridge the rights of the Landlord. Landlord shall execute Premises are located. Landlord agrees to cooperate with Tenant in any consent to such mortgage or conveyance as may reasonably be obtaining any executed subordination, non-disturbance and required. attornment agreement to the extent that such an agreement may be necessary. 16. ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS; Landlord hereby makes the following representations and warranties to Tenant: 21. MISCELLANEOUS: This Agreement and any attached Exhibits constitute the entire agreement between Landlord and a) Landlord has obtained all permits, licenses, or Tenant. No prior written communication or oral representations authorizations,if any,which are required under Environmental shall be binding. It shall not be amended except in writing and Laws, as defined below, with respect to the Landlord's signed by authorized representatives of both parties. The Property,induding the Leased Premises and to the best of its Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of knowledge,is in compliance in all material respects with same. the parties and their heirs, executors,administrators,successors and assigns. This Agreement may be executed in any number of b) Landlord is not aware of,and has not received notice of, counterparts,each of which shall be considered an original,but all of the presence of Hazardous Substances on the Landlord's which together shall constitute one instrument. Property,including the Leased Premises. Time is of the essence in this Agreement and each of its provisions. c) There is not pending or threatened against Landlord, This Agreement shall be construed and governed in accordance (and Landlord knows of no circumstances that might give rise with the laws of the State of Washington. If any provision is to)any civil,criminal or administrative action, or claim relating declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, or in any way to Environmental Laws with respect to the unenforceable,the remainder shall not be affected thereby,and shall Landlord's Property,including the Leased Premises. be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law. The venue for any litigation hereunder shall be King County, As used herein the following terms shall have the following Washington. Each party represents to the other that it has full right meanings: "Environmental Laws"shall mean all federal, state and and authority to enter into this Agreement. The prevailing party in local laws relating to pollution or protection of the environment. any litigation arising hereunder shall be entitled to its reasonable "Hazardous Substances" shall means any pollutant, contaminant, attorneys fees and court costs,including appeals costs,if any. hazardous or dangerous waste, substance or material regulated or controlled pursuant to any Environmental Law. 17. NOTICE: All notices hereunder must be in writing and shall be delivered by hand, by nationally overnight express delivery service,by U.S.registered or certified mail,return receipt requested, [The remainder of this section intentionally left blank] postage prepaid,or by facsimile to the addresses set forth below: TENANT: LANDLORD: GTE Wireless of the Pacific Incorporated Joseph T.Ryerson&Son.,Inc. 2445-140th Avenue NE,Suite 202 600 SW 10th Street Bellevue,WA 98005 Renton,WA 98055 Attn.: Network Director Attn.:Scott Patterson A copy for GTE shall also be sent to: GTE Wireless of the Pacific Incorporated, 245 Perimeter Center Parkway, 10th Floor, Legal Department, Atlanta, GA 30346, Attn.: Legal Department/1.8 Attorney. Any notice or other communication mailed as provided above shall be deemed effectively given(a)on the date of delivery,if delivered by hand, or (b) on the date mailed, if sent by overnight express delivery or U.S.mail. 01/13/98 Site No.:WA0366 - Ryerson Site 3/9 • IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have "TENANT" executed this Lease as of the date aforesaid. GTE WIRELESS OF THE PACIFIC INCORPORATED "LANDLORD" JOSEPH T. RYERSON & SON., INC. By: Print Name: Title: By: Print Name:Thomas C.Cygan Title: President By: Print Name: Federal Tax ID/SSN: Title: STATE OF ) COUNTY OF ) STATE OF ) COUNTY OF ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that is the person I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence who appeared before me, and said person that is acknowledged that he signed this instrument, on oath the person who appeared before me, and said person stating that he was authorized to execute the acknowledged that he signed this instrument, on oath instrument and acknowledged it as the stating that he was authorized to execute the of tarts WIRELESS OF THE instrument and acknowledged it as the President of PACIFIC INCORPORATED, to be the free and Joseph T.Ryerson& Son., Inc. (Ryerson West Region), voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the mentioned in the instrument. uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Notary Public in and for the State of Notary Public in and for the State of Residing at Residing at My Commission Expires: My Commission Expires: Print Notary's Name Print Notary's Name [NOTARY SEAL HERE] [NOTARY SEAL HERE] 01/13/98 Site No.:WA0366 - Ryerson Site 4/9 STATE OF ) COUNTY OF ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he signed this instrument, on oath stating that he was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the of GIL WIRELESS OF THE PACIFIC INCORPORATED, to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Notary Public in and for the State of Residing at My Commission Expires: Print Notary's Name [NOTARY SEAL HERE] O1/13,'98 Site No.:WA0366 - Ryerson Site 5/9 EXHIBIT "A" GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF LEASED PREMISES 01/13/98 Site No.:WA0366 - Ryerson Site 6/9 EXHIBIT "A-1" SURVEY OF LEASED PREMISES (To be provided to Landlord prior to commencement of Construction) 01/13/98 Site No.:WA0366 - Ryerson Site 7/9 • • EXHIBIT "B" LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF LANDLORD'S PROPERTY THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: LOT 5, EARLINGTON INDUSTRIAL PARK NO. 1, AS SHOWN BY THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED SEPTEMBER 22, 1967, IN VOLUME 83 OF PLATS, PAGE 10, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. 01/13/98 Site No.:WA0366 - Ryerson Site 8/9 EXHIBIT "C" COPY OF MEMORANDUM AGREEMENT 01/13/98 Site No.:WA0366 - Ryerson Site 9/9 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS LAND USE PERMIT SUBMITTAL WAIVED MODIFIED COMMENTS: REQUIREMENTS: BY: BY: Calculations, Survey, • Drainage Control Plan 2 2? • Drainage Report 2 Elevations, Architectural3AND4 Elevations, Grading 2 Existing Covenants (Recorded Copy)4 Existing Easements (Recorded Copy) 4 Flood Plain Map, if applicable 4 1//14N N • Floor Plans 3 AND 4 Geotechnical Report 2 AND 3 • Grading Plan, Conceptual 2 ,�' Grading Plan, Detailed 2 King County Assessor's Map Indicating Site 4 Landscaping Plan, Conceptual4 Legal Description 4 List of Surrounding Property Owners 4 Mailing Labels for Property Owners 4 Map of Existing Site Conditions 4 Master Application Form 4 Monument Cards (one per monument), Parking, Lot Coverage & Landscaping • Analysis 4 l/1/1/J Plan Redactions (PMTs) 4 Postage 4 Public Works Approval Letter 2 Title Report or Plat Certificate 4 Topography Map (5' contours)3 . Traffic Study 2 • Tree CuttingNegetation Clearing Plan 4 AN Utilities Plan, Generalized 2 • Wetlands Delineation Map4 /yK.N • Wetlands Planting Plan 4 jM1l N/�}- • Wetlands Study 4 /41 This requirement may be waived by: _ � 1. Property Services Section PROJECT NAME: C7-F ' r� 1 vO 0 r/,, 2. Public Works Plan Review Section 3. Building Section DATE: -1/a-i 4. Development Planning Section h:\division.s\develop.ser\dev.plan.ing\waiver.xls **************************************************************** City of Renton WA Reprinted: 04/21/98 10 :46 Receipt **************************************************************** Receipt Number: R9802401 Amount : 1, 504 .48 04/21/98 10 :46 Payment Method: CHECK Notation: #6624 JM CONSULT Init : LMN Project # : LUA98-064 Type: LUA Land Use Actions Parcel No: 214600-0050 Site Address : 600 SW 10TH ST Total Fees : 1, 504 .48 This Payment 1, 504 . 48 Total ALL Pmts : 1, 504 .48 Balance: . 00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 000 . 345 . 81 . 00 . 0006 Conditional Use Fees 1, 000 . 00 000 . 345 . 81 . 00 . 0007 Environmental Review 500 . 00 000 . 05 . 519 . 90 . 42 . 1 Postage 4 .48