Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA02-006 Kelly Williams LUA 02 OOG�c+uJ H, CF/Joos Storage Building F ,E Page 1j' From: Patrick Gilroy <patrick@northward.com> To: <jjordan@ci.renton.wa.us> Date: 6/6/02 5:52PM Subject: LUA-02-006,CU-H,ECF/Joos Storage Building Jason, Please add me as a party of record for this project, if possible. Also, I will be stopping by City Hall tomorrow morning around 8:30am--could I get a reduced copy of the site plan from you at that time? Thanks, Patrick Patrick J. Gilroy 1560- 140th Ave NE, #100 Bellevue, WA 98005 Tel. (425) 747-1726 1 (\` ctp �- Fax. (425) 747-4157 Cel. (425)444-7281 �`4e ■ JOOS STORAGE BUILDING/LUA02-006 PARTIES OF RECORD i ! IaAt Last printed 04/25/02 10:37 AM ____._ V -#4Y / / / CA J ' Paccar Kenworth Truck Plant YI\ T ite :LE 2 I�•MARIUJ ST. cizr AUTO 0 m IN IGN<H / Ar,,b j --1-I N 4th St TRAnt�1T LoT - e q RA wAaEN:u CA, \ })_I Q Q ❑ 4- -4 LaFFEE Cii i /` 1 E CiA y a �iTAURet4T �y r r r r �-•4''tGF l 1---1 I ' � 5nF#� /� 1 Ll C CC tt t7 CC d 4 USED c e.R SAI.e V WA I [IRS R8� 1 8Fta Ir9, L1 %'/' Et ` UTILITY O �RVATIYE PAIUT Oa C�--SII f�-�tr d .5 /� CA `I : I � cAA".I.�S u a t d la,TT ELEGTRIG JPPLr ❑ r1 >a 11 'STD SIR\ N Marion St n n 1= �5 IIrnL7 441 p I1 PQC,lFIG AUTO MAc+11rJE LI �-yy y Li ❑ CT E--1qR JAGk p.ofY:iLT I�i APPUAocE p )-[ d t ' .f J ULIAN Fi II EGTK+G MOTGWi/ C R8 C ,R . wNta 1:1CI El t-�2 d la•a a-4` U A tl❑Q❑❑ �I � T U v mas • N 3rd St V / 1 1Fq 4 2 la act ruciii P Ci Z CI A flhIIroi coe-t / II ° [] _Ata 4 ::: 0 / 0 � �11 MOTr L.LL' cuNrJ WMMR M ( / R8 R8 R8 Rtil. — _1- _ N 2nd St 1R O R1O R1O — aOLpEN aatace 4 CA CA CA CA r -41"k►T 0 .---------- WY H Bronson N /ill Vicinity Plan „ :,GALE I u: ZOO' kEY p oig t-E FANIL' RE,e,10EsiGE, U1JL. NoTeD Orn•feswlse iB-x MULTI-FAMILY UNIT wititimiwz op U4IT5 A PORTION OF THE NW.14 SEC.I7 T WP 23 N.RG.5 E.W.M. SITUATED IN THE CITY OF RENTON COUNTY OF KING STATE OF WASHINGTON N N i _ SCALE r.89' 1 ALLEY 22 r—— Avw•n'ri. r0r74% ' f -=T', I N LE64L DESCR/PT/ON metOW. 1W/ O.RMS.A9E(X MAP maw,howarant '- 000 1 :Nil)! i _ 4 fin i I • s • . 1 A.S ;li µ.-. % ? ._, am, . 'ter `r a ..,J. . 'II Sj --1-"'- -- ---- ----- - I f X MAR/ON S. .-Met de How ....II...II — 4`,Mw.+/a ne Na Bennett ]rS&JL INC PAUL JOOS STRUCTURE LOCATION SURVEYORS and ENGINEERS warm i5. Mn,3,..„ ,N o3 " P.O.1081031 PUYALLIN,WA 98371 0a-f2fe I PUYA1LUP 1253)8454833 SEAM 12531838.3474 Don WA.a '"r•.2a' 4 ' 1' w / —.......— tau/JOGS --,...r • • NW 1/4 of the NW 1/4 SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST. W.M. SITUATED IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON ID R..an:[4.AB4. NORM it A S3'REFf IRRAHANSEM. R wnn Arv.nv4i3we5 I ��N T — 'I' .w.Ie..I I I I I I I I '' I I I I I I I - r I \2\ 1 3 1 I 5 e I 7 I 8 9 I 10 II I LEGEND -. I I I I I I I 5.• SET Ne.4 RERAN R/CAP L.S.ND IMO/30000 '•g S I I 0 R FOUND MONUMENT-AS DESCRIBED - d I \ I I FOUNDCALCULATEDP.X.NAIL �I 1 \ ICI CALCULATED X: I I I I I a IMI MEASURED RI IP PLAT IRI RECORD.AS PER R.05.AFN.85 0813 9 005 E - IIIMMOMMIL® ALLRr S e X. j i'to i`-le 0 I I \ I nII N p IleI EQUIPMENT USED _ \ I S$ I= 13 SEC...WON-TOPODN AIOLo e. ` I I • I I I IFe PROCEDURE USED 117 I re 1 18 I 20 \I, 21 1 22 I 23 I 24 25 I 2e n o ID FIELD TRAVERSE -D I 8 ( I I I vm . 3 FR I \ I • S KIA. BASIS OF SEARING kG I I IB IS CENTE%INE NORYN 4Rh STREET I N B9'19'IS'E I Z_ I I I I I \ I 1 •- I` RON.1G�139005`RECORDSAORXING COUNTY.BASH _ - •.• m IPI I I "RN I# `'' \ _ • LEGAL DESCRIPTION kf P Z — — _ I `OT 25 DNO DESCRIPTION 12.CAR VIXKS 0001110N p_ .— — — _x e_5 I_ —,_,—_17,_ — — — O RENTa3.A000*NG TO NE PLAT INERER. ` PO _e I NORTH MARI ON STRUT RECORDED IN VOLUME IS 6 PLATS,PAGE 47. i \� IN NING COUNTY.VASNINGIdN. 4 ' N U a I I 9I \a 1 \o- II NUB OUIIVEY DOES NOT PURIORI TO SNo. EI '-•�"� �I \� 0.55 R 3.1 D FA�MO�NIS.OR LOCATION ROFCUTILITESIEXCEPT RI ,, / Ili \ O•Fx x.i vlwUYnO ..A5 I I • _I 1 w5I[ NAIL 2-4/-40 axR "l . r wet[ (—'xe — —._ NORM 9tA STA,s, — _ y 9.00 • ,Yp/.'GI_ _P'X/ IIR�1 EMT I SCALE.I.•40' s i “,./G1 •N.7 —.9-AI iIr .— ®0 !WAIL B i+ RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE RECORD OF SURVEY B SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE ! - FWd I.r r.Ded.. 4.o............ ROOD e N TM.Dy ewreDNF rgre...b a.n F.eM L1 BD.r Bennett INC. FR GS ..d.r BF Yr.y're0 I.De.Fee et the IrF. re N SURVEYORS E�NvoVtR.E�Ernr PAUL 0 JOOS WI Lad........of.. Al r•„.....U.H.Mir«. of AA.wr.l..<wdND.e1 w.M..qn?DI .. J. 80X ORS A�I�VL Ok 913S P !m5 'NOW!220N mi. P.O. BOX ON PUM-IP WA.B13T D.N.BT DAME JOB ND. F...e............................. .,Ml.�... .... "r�.�... �y DEK 2-10-2000 0218 /),ws ,Ll�r fl'• PUYALLLUP 845-8833 SEATTLE 838-3474 CIeD.I. SCALE Mal MANAGER" SUP.OF'RECORIii • Cwrlfl.er.N.. 12870 RUB I"-40' I OF I - Red.MS S2.4.E Project Data All I I __ obmNi�e.wt wr • 71 ,0t Y' i ana ._ ,wxoum. su.. \.1 -- 82 2 , -41'-1OII (��f ...,w 77:4w...A. 1 n I 1,40.1,E I .• 1�,�<IS,FA% . 1 OcAeome.WA "0"•'m"` J4-4 0 0"d YanSt su,.Iw �F L..Y�L, . -PO 0 ap Qsxi e.I-IxH F. MVAc UNIT I Zoning Code -�-T' �-- I �. Cwm.a W..lu1 --1 I L I. ,a,� m%,xeSx.,o.1.05F `:d-.,1Y Wales 30130464 Swop a. qLot Coverage : ss ,e 5, Iba'S1 - I A so, 01E64I bO1. 1W1 _- s LF:It 11,I. 41 1 Few,. xp 'SF, IJe./Se�SeFvr.ESioYw lt 3 I #f if' • Wrong No 1 MOO SF raw WIL'11.. ,,.0 I. o6 6 E%20 25 Ft,..tt. WI.0 w cw c�I �� xtilliv xip 'newt.I*. 21.I,FST LL. 54, I• 1Building Data ° — I 11 r n I Ears c.a ,�,U� _ f II - __-� .�� i QLu4My i Storage 1' 7' q K I1I t4 .w�S.2 Sml.o. U-1 a..mo Su,.. I I 111111 I..os.ILY LL.1 . 'BOO I I 1 • Tml ALLO 729 10,114 I Li SM.. a. r I S..ro.. w / I I I...rLT _I •Legal Description I = ' r ' L42144426 N.IL 0.446.1441040414.4.0. .00006 o M F.I.M.a.wwe.,n w.m.,5 a —lr.yrld Na.YL —�— •T' CI•IE. F.w,.%+rocma.w.I.a.a _ 1006 Fwweo - . Index to Drawings •*( ,,,RT • , F"" I I i = I N • . E. EMsww • " � --- _ 1 , •O N�.redo. AJ Key •: u g1.FL.Mr � \ rK .411101041 116411010.04 LY.FIM1.,4'aG. - wwr uwFr.T�• plr.I.w a.nw+.wu,.) 'Ns -4- ///.. --- rv- s_L_ NellcW r..waNWf "R.L•i'wL. .' • .Tewxc..r.,u.Xw1 (Lmp'MeM,O. 0/.4=e1 Sr..a�kKRr i I� Y `5 1I _ �. Ww2p P Y.:;iw N1'..1.,us„ 4"IInSCY�a4. .• . ti /.;/ / 1 s..Iws. ,�, •p snwY..w*w.a Ir°.Fo,•.ei ac. .' r II ',Le' 1 Ps'mod'meow L. bawl.uw.ors 4�.F� ewso 01 4 1 - - tt ___ .4+, N.Marion Street E• _ Site Plan /Landscaping Plan 1 • b Lea. •.Iio' L g -7- 4 . • 2. Alley 1 1 i 0.•0" .. .5..... 7 4 -- 4••• '': • --•• t -*. 4•1,, i , :..050:001010,-2 . i.r_i_. .•11 4" 1. 4, St40 ,, .--- It14 I , :4 f 1 . .. •4,v,l‘r.-----0....../.il.V5000/ • 4 1 Z • • 'il --, r;...V.tt ..5,0.55.1,•; . • -4- VY 0'>':---44 Q •• ''j ,.....4..Tio.--coor.---• ----- 1-7 d / — , , , . \ 4,- • / ,F••••44.06-16•S., •=11.- Ai\ • ..-. Si I h 54:1 . 0 -4, . , It , I:I ,-,r:;:: I . • 4;e::-, ii I- (7 ____ i WO•1441:50. 1 1 re.' a . .; M./ .- UP Mt,st.. 01'3 4........• I 3.20 50.5 Wm.:A rota, / -, or 0,53" • \ ..' / 5.4 5.5. $1,' 5177 ,.---10.01 le,3534t 00 -C\ • . a a: 1 II (.--...OP0' 5•3.4. . 6 • Me.r......15.a jr- 4 S.5on If g . . , )1i •"r11 ... (1..000•044•.5.) . % . / s ...00,•21,0-) •-5 "C% . 3 l' r. 1111111_ Owe:o,p0•4JBer To a i • - ..hr......I.,....5“.5r. ..,1 (.1.1%4P Pl.••45.nag ,- , $ 9.0•47...) . / • , / . ,..-........1..4, - a 111 111111 \ . \ / . 1 . W J WI MCP LO[j s. v .1' A 1mm."MUM 550,15,71.\,_ ma..P Ft.1.1 Awe . • 50.POW-) 1. .t. . -4 '16- 1 tqn../.1.0 rt g.C•mograr.: .,-I-4- ..I... -E'b.." ..Q . now,AA 1 . t, • • P., 1/1.911 i 1 . . ,,,.... 4 =-_--f_4. 4-1 Ne't,... ru,_,,--41: 1 L.KKA-KKte Key ,..,........Yea 4... .11 :-..:,....g i . 14'4. ril - __ — ..,.Ji. -1--.7-. : I .4..,....60.6..4•015 I..,...r, 1,....4• ,-... .• , • ‘41/ '.17777- . .91 1 11 • 141.1.415,11.11.744/ , / -...1 • Pll:1 - .1. •1 ' Ill % it f5.0.0 I 1 .auPetur 11.. 1 •11 1.'. :Mt P0•510-.1 1' 14 Lo. pirt ty.awn .4 OM*WAS, 4 ,..... 00....• 40LO. ,Li" 1 11•4' ,,1•0'. i 101: 0.:164 4 ; . • --4. N.Marion Street • _.,._ isk MezzaninePlan . ,,.. 1)FirJkfloor Plan 2 . guy...,... 4,. ..,, . • r. • I 1 1 - - 441.0•4•9 or or _ OP‘ole For =, ,. 2 17 r ll :-.4 1 _ I f _____ ---- ___ - • L.41,O. --1—,.--___ /t ill ir --- .$44. m rES,V1r--0" • L ---s 1.1? HMI-OW&SO.*-7 lirl =e .-- I -4, III • 1 i • 7, 1•142244o1C 111 —_ ....,_.., ....,- "'""..i7,...! .....---- -_ -- ,_--------==-- . — .. - ii no e E isi t i•111.•11,1ii/ F44). 1,,,,,, i! tii i RI ........ _f—i,__ 5,4" 41 il oc...TOL...•,/ , i 11 WM.44*oo.,•• II I'l Eor•••••••POO41 mote Ian cf Ran.. IIIIIII West Elevation South ( Marion St.) Elevation IIIIII/ 40,4 10=tr-o •coa. 1/s •i-o I'll" 1 1- 1 [...j . 1 . _ __. ,-_-,-- ---------,- _ _. 1--, -- --- . RA'S PBX* — f rien,G...srPoSIr--11 r oL• • E i /. 1 .1012.....41 _ - a.0., . - ..., 1 ... ..., \ fr.,a. I....le•e•il 1,I 1 \ MJ.Pyr.p. B.10•Prefarlat - 4.— —4- f:1 A. t 4 4- 4 II North Elevation East Elevation , liwil.:finNo r 0 11111111111111 mininui— lit .5* MOH ra.... 1.0 1.01.0.0•er ABB nom a 4..... 3 *Feta *..04, Ve•f-o" • / iiI - MI - .w s 4-_S ,.w....n.sw.var.r r r.....m,ar> / // - r 6Ir / / ese, / AI__ K IJ �SR9 >� nr.7,euw.w zn N..w�d>.. m e wro -\ ... . N 4th St 'm..ra.urr se.na aw '. aw. D o 0 o s-Ero --a ar ea G AM' C. �`, �wrRrrT I w"..nna owf 4.106..'rn*m ❑aC ha au t 1—i . C v. .a+++ewr w..+ • // / ea Ns.u.s+rar S A d it,4i • �,� . i i�Nrae rr+rer"T J ' 'V`-A\ , l Dn. ❑ at a rim Car S N ��ti,.e.r..w.urnl tl J D D n \ Aria FIc.Arm Haub. 1 Ma rNe...s w.rxA w � / / n 0 at-s _ � .i.. Y p D o G e ...es i, \❑ D R8 .0 J.W.aeu.,c wears/ _ qC. WY.1.041 -�.\ Ir 'Q Fin`nw - d YPt Al_.Q' ❑qo❑4❑❑ i C s.i+wT wo un is _.- j._._1.Ir .. 7....z,.._-- � N 3rd SStty iii���' 4 i a7�i I_••• ',M...+rPaa wA.6.seeaa.a2 tlq 4r, ...Don,.❑ / 1 14: Ott VIM I'iiV Z \0 S ID d = R8 d/ _ m�w+wu-wr / i f 4"ncvrtl. ii.rtidr. R.n.mr.wi..w. r 4 S lj�D o I !Ct ns..w.Dw — {Gq i a...v r I «�N.Marion St. s.e.-....__ ?//3:71.6.37 Y Gcrook. cCrwre /r w es u... e..+nw,_. r.u /y / c7 " /ww upa.C wswe / dell. mires MOP Pr.o T7 / / Re Re R� p e -•Iw.�/ / N 2nd St Ir,,.,,..eo.,xn=.o1.sss Frtefiow Requirement / / CA G +r Vb �'}� ` Existing Impervious SurfaceC,,,,,,,,�,,, v.,a„ M. t lw a.s •�� t..Nn, a>. Am ee a • L� E..'tl9syAt/ m: .•.m.nw.. u v nw cvu / Bronson-. 2 t:m•'Coca*Mt.TS T>w :s. rn, Hydrant Requiremenp Proposed Impervious Surface »,r.rt n:.��rNaw Ali Vicinity Plan .,w,r n.116 from Intl an 121¢....a nn ex rromw dell / mierru..a i •.... Dm., ,su iI w.a.nwM.,.c from a. on w„wi Tvo.00t .fit 91. Construction Sequence 1=i ,wears anse muse.. Im ious'Surface Subject to .,........ „ .rart p,� ..r.,no^ •• IS-x ri...-I.wLr Wirt wi rwyr•or Un6. Vehicl Trafficint.loot..nxel art Ales .nnect each don te....Seer oa ..oa.anw rvw Na.Dn..i ISM Pou...eo,e... Total pep teem.14,Down eon porno et amen,connect to mono men e.n n won ern loot NL,fM m.L Nc n. ., ,161,111. M.a.l Lo•L.CANAL / {j I} N."-'.r O..Ma. a"•s•1.11..srti �; \ - I a•.uY/..(4 611.IM'Am., I MNN,s er se !NR Nra.L Q _ J� �� i ' - - 7- I .MGroN qWl '1.Yr.•yIl(. �� r / S ' • ! Utility/ DrainagePIn Ia L�A = Nm.v.e.D....P „art i".za'o / .r --i .. , J L _ -__- ..„t amrr r me )G Ioak swot I.a .• T.a.W T./AnyLT.a W M rt..M.ar 6 aYa6,M• x 11' / I.D riarlAY Ta rrraW nCNu,.LY• 2LeVATi0W JCrt�ON .1. ,t• E.0..L,se We + ,Aron dr 4.. aNrna'a.u/i 6..(Qe. I y ►,ala'Mnaw cal6 *dui nor,se ' WWI.r'.K ra.YaalT GAD COT 604,504. t "'a a Tem .Construction Approach Silt Fence Detail 4 i ®Mc.... ®N.•, Hau Ming Tam Dan Tuan Tran Weng and Sou Wan Chan 314 Factory Avenue North 320 Factory Avenue North 1509 North Marion Street Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055 135230-1050-03 135230-1055-08 135230-1060-01 Donald and Melissa M. Mitchell Arcarius Homes, LLC Steven N. and Kim L. Bui 1515 North Marion Street 6947 Coal Creek Parkway 315 Factory Place North Renton, WA 98055 Suite 257 Renton, WA 98055 Newcastle, WA 98059 135230-1065-06 135230-1066-05 135230-1070-09 Kim Hanh Thi Pham Christopher J. and Rhonda Berger 308 Factory Avenue North 410 Sunset Blvd North Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055 135230-1075-04 135230-1086-01 Vahe and Sonia Horsepian Shane P. and Lisa M. Masters James E. Plute PO Box 50322 1510 North 3rd Street 7831 220th Street SW Bellevue, WA 98015 Renton, WA 98055 Edmonds, WA 98026 135230-1115-06 135230-1120-09 135230-1125-04 James E. Plute Earl and Elizabeth Waltner Earl and Elizabeth Waltner 7831 220th Street SW 1526 North 3rd Street 1526 North 3rd Street Edmonds, WA 98026 Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055 135230-1130-07 135230-1135-02 135230-1140-05 Gyu Dong Cho Seattle Opera Association Francis and Buttnich, LLC 1525 North 4th Street PO Box 9248 204 First Avenue South Renton,WA 98055 Seattle, WA 98109 Seattle, WA 98104 135230-1185-01 135230-1205-07 135230-1225-03 Friedel Waldenburge- Ernest J. Tonda Ernest J. Tonda 345 North 3rd Place 528 Edmonds Avenue NE 528 Edmonds Avenue NE Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 135230-1245-09 135230-1265-04 135230-1275-02 Paul N. and Desnee M. Joos M. Nadi Fakharzadeh City of Renton 13510 SE 50th Place PO Box 78404 1055 South Grady Way Bellevue, WA 98006 Seattle,WA 98178 Renton, WA 98055 135230-1285-00 135230-1295-08 135230-1300-01 Burlington Northern Santa Fe Attn: Property Tax Mick C. Santa PO Box 96189 Columbia and Puget Sound Ry Company 4905 116th Avenue SE Fort Worth, TX 76161 Bellevue, WA 98006 172305-9033-01 172305-9006-04 172305-9093 08 Jack W. and Linda R. Roberts Floyd Kerb Garrett L.Almont 19212 67th Avenue SE 22225 SE 4th 10113 416th Avenue SE Snohomish, WA 98296 Redmond, WA 98052 North Bend, WA 98045 172305-9094-07 172305-9095-06 172305-9111-06 Mick C. Santa Paccar Inc. 116th Avenue SE Attn: Corporate Accounting 4905Bellevue, WA 98006 PO Box 1518 Bellevue, WA 98009 172305-9155-03 722300-0010-04 CITX OF RENTON Ina Hearing Examiner Jesse Tanner,Mayor Fred J.Kaufman June 25,2002 Neal Thompson Roger H.Newell,AIA 1102 19th Avenue East Bellevue, WA 98112 Re: Joos Storage Building File No.: LUA-02-006,CU-H,ECF Dear Mr.Thompson: The Hearing Examiner's Report and Decision on the above referenced matter,which was issued on June 10,2002 was not appealed within the time period established by ordinance. Please contact City Staff for fmal processing. Please feel free to contact this office if further assistance or information is required. Sincerely, k)(�.S Fred J.Kaufman Hearing Examiner FJK:kw cc: Jason Jordan,Development Services Andree DeBauw,Development Services 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055-(425)430-6515 RENTON �,^� AHEAD OF THE CURVE l�F)This paper contains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer E OF AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION NOTICDETERMINATIONENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Barbara Alther,first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of the COMMITTEE RENTON,WASHINGTON The Environmental Review SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL Committee has issued a 600 S.Washington Avenue,Kent,Washington 98032 Determination of Non-Significance- Mitigated for the following project under the authority of the Renton a daily newspaper published seven(7)times a week. Said newspaper is a legal newspaper of Municipal Code. general publication and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of JOOS STORAGE BUILDING publication, referred to, printed and published in the English language continually as a daily Construction of a storage buildings newspaper in Kent, King County,Washington. The South County Journal has been approved as a located within the CA zoning legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. designation. Location: 1532 North • The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the South County Journal(and Marion Street. not in supplemental form)which was regularly distributed to the subscribers during the below Appeals of the environmental t be filed in writing stated period. The annexed notice, a ontor before 5 00ermination sPM May 13, 2002. Joos Storage Building Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 on: 4/29/02 application fee with: Hearing as publishedExaminer, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of$80.25,charged to 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are Acct. No. 8051067. governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regard-ing the The cost above includes a$6.00 fee for the printing of the affidavits. appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, Legal Number 10292 (425)430-6510. A./...17.401-- A Pu on Hearing will i held he the Renton Hearing Examiner in the Council Chambers,City Hall,on May Legal Clerk, South County Journal 21, 2002 at 9:00 AM to consider the Conditional Use Permit. If the Environmental Determination is Subscribed and sworn before me on this day of hi/_ ,2002 appealed, the appeal will be heard . as part of this public hearing. ( I v` tttt�tllfY�/ )(}\ Interested parties are invited to `.�.‘‘t .. M. fE* '• �� , c attend Publishedu inic he hearing. County . .. .•ssiONE• . ! . Notary Public of the State of Washingto �. A.,:•� a,oi•. i oo Journal April 29,2002.10292 '. ,` 9�•.y o residing in Renton .Q:•4n us%C ?�; TAU/7y . H m King County,Washington --b— — '/,,,,011eaaJa III tt%1'' s AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON) ) ss. County of King ) Kelly Williams being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and states: That on the 10th day of June, 2002 affiant deposited in the mail of the United States a sealed envelope(s) containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. Signature: VL6.3LO\ 'Cutuk cJ vstset SUBSCRIBEQ 15 84:4144ORN to before me this f/f` day of , 2002. /sr ........... . ti s .' T�g� 's C. 0. k1/4� ---46.y,ket/ti , PUBISC. I Notary ublic in and for the State of Washington, • 1I .•..8 - t: &Residing at ' �e� ,therein. \0 Application, Petition, or Case No.: Joos Storage Building LUA-02-006,CU-H,ECF The Decision or Recommendation contains a complete list of the Parties of Record i HEARING EXAMINER'S REPORT June 10,2002 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION APPLICANT: Paul N.Joos 13510 SE 501 Place Bellevue,WA 98006 Joos Storage Building File No.: LUA-02-006,CU-H,ECF LOCATION: 1532 Marion Street SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant is seeking a Conditional Use Permit for the construction of a storage building located within the CA zoning designation. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Development Services Recommendation: Approve with conditions DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REPORT: The Development Services Report was received by the Examiner on May 14,2002 PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Development Services Report,examining available information on file with the application,field checking the property and surrounding area;the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The following minutes are a summary of the May 21,2002 hearing. The legal record is recorded on tape. The hearing opened on Tuesday,May 21,2002 at 9:04 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of the Renton City Hall. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing the original Exhibit No.2: Site&Landscaping Plan application,proof of posting,proof of publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No.3: Vicinity&Utility Drainage Plan Exhibit No.4: Building Elevation Plan Exhibit No.5: Floor Plan Exhibit No.6: Zoning Map Joos Storage Building File No.: LUA-02-006,CU-H,ECF June 10,2002 Page 2 The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by Jason Jordan,Associate Planner,Development Services,City of Renton, 1055 S Grady Way,Renton, Washington 98055. The applicant is requesting environmental review and Hearing Examiner conditional use permit approval for the construction of a 10,114 square foot storage building to be located at 1532 North Marion Street. There is currently a single family home and detached garage located on the site that is to be demolished as part of the application. The applicant is proposing to construct a one-story storage building with a mezzanine level. The ground floor is proposed to approximately 7,605 square feet and the mezzanine level is proposed to be 2,509 square feet. The structure is planned to be approximately 28 feet in height. The project would provide three interior parking stalls. Storage buildings in the Commercial Arterial(CA)zone require a conditional use permit. Storage buildings are also limited to one story in height even though a structure can be up to 50 feet in height. This is why the applicant is proposing a one-story building with a mezzanine level,which is one-third of the floor space. The Environmental Review Committee(ERC)has issued a Determination of Non-significance Mitigated(DNS- M)for the project. No appeals of the threshold determination were filed. There were four conditions imposed by the ERC. The applicant is required to adhere to the recommendations contained in the geotechnical report. The applicant is required to install and maintain temporary erosion control measures during project construction. The applicant is required to pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee. Finally,the applicant is also required to pay the appropriate traffic mitigation fee. There are 11 criteria that the Code asks the Hearing Examiner to consider for conditional use permits. The first item is consistency with the Comprehensive Plan Zoning Code and other ordinances. The subject site is designated Employment Area—Commercial(EA-C)on the City's Comprehensive Plan map. The objective of the EA-C is to provide for commercial and residential uses requiring large amounts of land and/or high visibility. The storage building is a commercial use,which is consistent with the intent of the zone. The development standards for the CA zoning designation require a 10-foot front yard setback along any street property line. The applicant has proposed a 10-foot landscaping strip pursuant to the Code. No other setbacks are required in the CA zone as long as the subject site is not adjacent to or abutting any residential property. The proposed storage building has also been designed to meet the maximum lot coverage. In the CA zone lot coverage is limited to 65 percent if there is no structure parking or 75 percent if there is structure parking. In this case there are three structured parking stalls in the proposed storage building;therefore, lot coverage is all allowed to go up to 75 percent. Height in this zone is limited to 50 feet;however,the applicant is only proposing 28 feet of building height. The Hearing Examiner is also asked to evaluate community need. Staff has indicated that the proposed storage building is intended to serve the applicant and possibly future clients and would not result in the detrimental over concentration of the use within the City or immediate area of the site. The subject site is located in an increasingly commercial area and would only occupy a.23 acre site therefore it is not expected to dramatically increase noise,odor or produce other adverse impacts to surrounding properties. The applicant has proposed an interesting building and the design review staff was quite impressed. The subject property is located in a predominantly commercial industrial area of the community. There are several commercial and industrial buildings in the area. The storage building would be screened by landscaping along the southern property line adjacent to North Marion Street. The neighboring properties include a used car sales office and service shop,other commercial office buildings,an auto repair shop and the Seattle Opera Warehouse. There a couple of single family homes in the area that are nonconforming. Joos Storage Building File No.: LUA-02-006,CU-H,ECF June 10,2002 Page 3 Parking regulations require one stall per 3,500 square feet of storage area. The applicant is proposing a 10,114 square foot building,which requires three parking stalls. The three parking stalls are located in the northeast corner of the building immediately off of the alley. The applicant is proposing the minimum required parking for the site. The stalls would be accessed from the alley. Access is proposed from two locations,the 16-foot alley adjacent to the north property line and from Marion Street,which is adjacent to the south property line. There is a parking pad in front of the proposed storage building where individual could pick up items from the front. There is also a pedestrian connection along the sidewalk from North Marion Street to the main entrance of the building. Staff does anticipate that some short-term noise impacts are likely to occur during the initial construction of the project. The applicant's construction mitigation plan as well as existing code provisions should limit these concerns. Once completed,the proposed use is not anticipated to increase noise and glare impacts significantly over the existing conditions. The CA zone requires a 10-foot landscaping strip or setback along the property street frontage. Staff is proposing a condition of approval requiring the applicant to plant three vine maple trees within that 10-foot landscape setback. Staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit subject to the one condition regarding the addition of three vine maple trees. Neal Thompson,do Roger H.Newell,AIA, 1102 19th Avenue East, Seattle,WA 98112 stated that the height of the building is 28 feet. At this point the owner of the building would like to keep his options open regarding whether the storage building will be for public or private use. Mr.Jordan stated that the Code does not require on-site employees;however, there is a provision in the Code that if an applicant chooses to do on-site security or an office they may. Mr.Jordan stated that Dr.Joos,the owner,has made the decision that the storage building will be open to the public. The storage or warehouse use whether commercial or private is a preferred use over the existing single- family residence. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 9:36 a.m. FINDINGS,CONCLUSIONS&DECISION Having reviewed the record in this matter,the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant, Paul N.Joos,filed a request for approval of a Conditional Use Permit to establish a storage building in the Commercial Arterial(CA)Zone. 2. The yellow file containing the staff report,the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA)documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit#1. 3. The Environmental Review Committee(ERC),the City's responsible official, issued a Declaration of Non- Joos Storage Building File No.: LUA-02-006,CU-H,ECF June 10,2002 Page 4 Significance-Mitigated(DNS-M)for the subject proposal. 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5. There was no opposition from the public regarding the subject proposal. 6. The subject site is located at 1532 Marion Street. The subject site located on the north side of Marion Street between Factory Place North and Houser Way. The site is located a block south of North 4th Street and south of the Paccar Kenworth Plant. 7. The site is currently developed with a single-family home and detached garage. Both would be removed if the permit is approved. 8. The subject site was annexed to the City with the adoption of Ordinance 156 enacted in May 1909. 9. The subject site is zoned CA(Commercial Arterial). The CA Zone is intended to provide space for uses that need the commercial exposure provided by arterial streets. 10. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of employment generating uses,but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the Plan. 11. The subject site is a rectangular parcel of approximately 10,145 square feet. 12. The parcel is generally level. 13. The alley north of the parcel is 16 feet wide. 14. The area around the subject site is zoned CA for the most part with some R-8 (Residential Single Family; 8 units per acre)located southwest of the subject site. 15. The site is not on a large or well-exposed commercial street. 16. The project requires a 10 foot landscaped setback in the CA zone. No other yards are required for this CA parcel. The building may be 50 feet tall and may cover up to 75 percent of the lot if it provides interior parking. 17. The building would have a footprint of 7,605 square feet.Internally there would be a mezzanine containing 2,509 square feet. The complex would total approximately 10,114 square feet. 18. The proposed building would be 28 feet tall. It has an articulated roof that also presents a curve or arc from the street. 19. The applicant proposes landscaping the 10-foot setback as required. The building would cover 75 percent of the lot area,which is permitted with internal parking. The applicant proposes a variety of landscaping in the setback. It would include Downy Clematis,Creeping St. Johnswort and Vinca Minor. Staff has recommended larger Vine Maples be incorporated into the landscaping to provide a better screen and soften the visual impact of the building. 20. There would be three(3)parking spaces inside the structure. The applicant proposes loading space on a Joos Storage Building File No.: LUA-02-006,CU-H,ECF June 10,2002 Page 5 temporary basis on the front driveway. 21. Access to the building would be provided by rollup doors both on Marion Street on the south and on the alley on the north. 22. Storage use is permitted in the CA zone by approval of a Conditional Use Permit approved by the Hearing Examiner. 23. Staff reported that there are not a lot of storage facilities in this area. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The applicant for a Conditional Use Permit must demonstrate that the use is in the public interest,will not impair the health, safety or welfare of the general public and is in compliance with the criteria found in Section 4-31-36(C),which provides in part that: a. The proposal generally conforms with the Comprehensive Plan; b. There is a general community need for the proposed use at the proposed location; c. There will be no undue impacts on adjacent property; d. The proposed use is compatible in scale with the adjacent residential uses, if any; e. Parking, unless otherwise permitted,will not occur in the required yards; f. Traffic and pedestrian circulation will be safe and adequate for the proposed project; g. Noise, light and glare will not cause an adverse affect on neighboring property; h. Landscaping shall be sufficient to buffer the use from rights-of-way and neighboring property where appropriate;and i. Adequate public services are available to serve the proposal. The requested conditional use appears justified. 2. The proposed storage warehouse seems reasonably well designed and has its setback enhanced by the required landscaping. The location of the subject site makes it suitable for the storage warehouse since it is not located in a highly visible location. It might be inappropriate to usurp a site with high visibility for a use with such low needs for visibility. In this case,Marion Street and the parcel are somewhat isolated or out of the way,at least. The proposed storage warehouse is not really expected to generate an employment base as envisioned by the Comprehensive Plan. But the small site cannot be expected to serve a use that would create much employment. 3. Staff noted that there is not an overabundance of storage warehouses in this location. It was unclear if the use was to be a public use or a private storage warehouse. The applicant indicated that it would be open to the public. 4. The proposed use is permitted in the CA provided that it meets the required bulk and setback standards. Joos Storage Building File No.: LUA-02-006,CU-H,ECF June 10,2002 Page 6 The building will be approximately 28 feet tall,which is permitted in the CA Zone. The building provides the 10 foot landscaped setback from Marion Street as required. The landscaping,as indicated by staff, should be supplemented with some larger species to soften the streetscape and provide a better visual buffer. 5. Whether such a facility is needed in this area is hard to determine. Clearly,the property's use as a single- family home is non-conforming. 6. The proposed building appears to be reasonably scaled for the lot and neighborhood. It has some design features that should reduce its apparent bulk. It will be slightly larger than normal since it will be providing interior parking,which permits 75 percent lot coverage. 7. The proposed parking meets code for the use and three stalls will be located on the inside of the building. An additional temporary stall would be the front driveway apron. 8. It appears that circulation through the site is adequate. The property has both street and alley access. 9. The CA Zone does not require yards and anticipated dense construction. Light and air will enter the site from the street and alley but is otherwise adequate given the CA Zones standards for development. 10. As recommended by staff,the landscaping should be supplemented with Vine Maples or other larger specimens. 11. The site is adequately served by infrastructure. 12. In conclusion,the proposed use is a reasonable use of the subject site even if it is not a perfect match for the Comprehensive Plan. DECISION: The Conditional Use Permit is approved subject to the following condition: 1. The applicant shall be required to provide three Vine Maple trees or acceptable substitutes,a minimum of 20 feet on center,within the 10 foot landscaping setback adjacent to North Marion Street. The satisfaction of this requirement shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of the Final Occupancy Permit. ORDERED THIS 10th day of June,2002. FRED J.KAUF HEARING E ER TRANSMI FIbD THIS 10th day of June,2002 to the parties of record: Joos Storage Building File No.: LUA-02-006,CU-H,ECF June 10,2002 Page 7 Jason Jordan Paul N.Joos Neal Thompson 1055 S. Grady Way 13510 SE 50th Place Roger H.Newell,MA Renton,WA 98055 Bellevue,WA 98006 1102 19th Avenue East Seattle,WA 98112 Patrick J.Gilroy 1560 140th Avenue NE,#100 Bellevue, WA 98005 TRANSMI 1"1'ED THIS 10th day of June,2002 to the following: Mayor Jesse Tanner Gregg Zimmerman,Plan/Bldg/PW Admin. Members,Renton Planning Commission Neil Watts,Development Services Director Larry Rude,Fire Marshal Sue Carlson,Econ.Dev.Administrator Lawrence J. Warren,City Attorney Larry Meckling,Building Official Transportation Systems Division Jay Covington,Chief Administrative Officer Utilities System Division Councilperson Kathy Keolker-Wheeler South County Journal Pursuant to Title IV,Chapter 8, Section 100G of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m.,June 24,2002. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure,errors of law or fact,error in judgment,or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen(14)days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record,take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV,Chapter 8, Section 110,which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk,accompanying a filing fee of$75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department,first floor of City Hall. An appeal must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m.,June 24,2002. If the Examiner's Recommendation or Decision contains the requirement for Restrictive Covenants,the executed Covenants will be required prior to approval by City Council or final processing of the file. You may contact this office for information on formatting covenants. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte(private one-on-one)communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. . --- ---- . ._ . . F3 - 18 T23N R5E E 1/2 . ., . , ,,,,„ -.4i,r,ipil r-.--71i!adais -, :- - / / V_UINCIE ; / H 1 1 7" 1 iT:Th „L'LL.IL.J. 1.6.__L_Li...,_ / / —0 - N../k 'k ••• 7" ! i iriti! 7101-N! III -- / 1-9-) - i I I r; .. - w ri 41 4 • ' --- . I=Ritztt= dittd=1:1= .--•-•-yi—, ' 1 - u-rneTV Ave.: 7' i I -.C.)-s- *a =3 _ 13; ! ; Li_H ; gt4;4 : tc), chil § 2--/ i z8Miami-his Alio., ig :-: @I 1 gi 1 ti !; : i i o• i I :(:)! I ; • c / / Atk, • / / 731 / i k-43' 1 ENCEE i II wwww \7 Rm-fu pm 0,_ g 1 imin w ai ,---, i : , ; / / cc' /1 , IR8 ! /MIZE 11 "1 i ° iiiesetkk,I 1 ii e f.I 7:t i 1$ E im 1 i' L ;117 i 1: co pl imp NI in , r-7 7 i : - i / / •_•_e_s•-- ot , i Ceer n [ 9.1 1;1 i t\7 r 17 li: if 8r7-: :7 f- 7'1R78. 1 A bi II i ••• 0 //,/, * ! !R-13 ! R,Eli ! ric) , ;R,.-sji 04o R II ! a . ; in&ve 1 i 1 ,0 I 1 ; 1-1121 i'.rIX& x ' 4.* / / ,•\ R-8 111.112MME R 10 ( 1 1 gi) ' 0 1-405 k _62 ' " / •'8\ .41-,--• R-8 iFeily /4 -TILE k to • 'T 46. .1111% D(P)1 CD 01, ti // ':\s‘ - ' '- I-- 117-10 I • 1 • ' R48 • i R10 1 i I f i2,-10 \i;i • , / -/I, •*'s • ' , I 1111MAIE 13 0 I cc 1 9,Q,, , ./ *..7 , :cAl 1 . 1 z A-4oPaircic mirmigi CA ; e: S R-8 E ' k-81 , ' R-8 ' ' :.- I 7132 / / g ----1 . , . , _, , . . ,_ / ./ u 0 R--,ipi. i icc cc loci rg. (4 z ; , . !../P ari ' : Ave. .,i.-',--- i S . Renton Avei .i Si Xj--...-<. i i \ C"); -•- --- 1.1 ti 1.. oF•H , -1 co a>' IP. ' i ; ' I F4-) Garden Ave. N a el 71---\ \' i 1 , '..- -- - . , ! , / • s_... 1 i ':- - i 111.--V7 i.,, IMAM'MEM REZEIEE) 1—L ;RH1 --04.8;/ 7:1 ....---- WU 'IM it:4f 9 ,v•ze .:.'! RE ..,4 --jz 0 -6- ; ! ''-, 0 i :--- , . I,,,, m , 30,--- - • 1-- 4 ' . .... VI , . 70 n • . ----.-0 - n • 3. , -._. _ • /"N / 0 / l'( ...s,._C • N ,-P'• :', N../ : • I \ '' b.) Z/1 a as NMI LT Ar—(10triC.-- • _ 11'• • .. .rIVI•O &p.•..f- . f 11 ` 11 jl -- SI • � / 1 -.' -•a . ! • ISIr.•••WISP r • t --.ww•Ni.N• J • LYY \ ;I .sill«.. • I 1! 1. Ii • 1 '!1�" l /• F.r.r.r a...•• .. ` i / . N.W.•'IJ� • I IPO I •.— t l l iMM / If1M�wY Y•... 0 ' • '• .iY • Z iI _. ! / f —.t...w•Y.vi i1 I1 I• II 1 , ...OW 0.001 . • r I +_i -_ OM oar 11/40462 "el_ . I al .._.�. .t4 �+.:. ..ti.� ., — a fin.....~el • • :111 \-1 : . • • . . . . 1. • Ja `— r rwr. I I: ,Tr- 1 le 4.76-.„--. Y..'•I,• rite - r4• --- -_t Marion Street -_ _.._„ t A,k Mezzanine Plan i"fi.Firstjloor Plan .2 I my.d..»••.O• . . I.-... ••r. /l./ •L � ' . . . • ,. . 1 .1' . . 1 1 I 1 -.--------....-- . . • —.— .. . —— . • ,// - —._— _ ...,___. _ _ — _ .• • . . ' • /'' -If "....„...ems woe..marearra si sessor 1,••••••wag.) • • • . - 1/1. .I — ..— pi — _ __ o..11 .....:,... I • / / / • • i" , ,ti,...., •- / / CA i . 1 Parsaer Kennorth Truck Plant \. . J / ite ,... riaw roe Me A INN OA ii a AIN NI s o A ;Tr 84.1.r. In AA ......or. ..... CA N 41h Sr . iar .*OWN AN Nay.. .--,'1,...'!, ,A. ' 4 o Vi.4-73,7 dZa..1 LUMMIPIRIEW CA g ONANN.111 \ 1(.....,6yyy Pant oNI ran.* r a/7 SS trja _g,,r0 4.Stf!IW%,, ''.... c se• • NANNOI IAN/ 1 vatw Fr,1 4/F a...........,, \ I.... ..... ...... . ' ....i................ ..• ' , • . 41 C :,: a ra ri\ e ..,,,,,,,...... I \ N..* *I •. I.Jiis.•!!: IIIII.... 4/ ' o n a 0 c 1 0442\ Vij =4 Ill A.11111111 ANON St a a Ar .... Jo,.116.00.1....1••••/Ma.•• 1: . . ... . 1(I.L. EirOM • 41 / --• • .a.24..aa,._11,1 4 Oa I .• .....,AAA IN11. i IS l' 1 i __ eursenSI In 1,11.010..a.2 / 1 I{ -- . ".'"•'t"-mar. —. . 71 47/4:1/: ./. 41, .9r-liEliii7,, z An ............. / I II •/NNW Ill13..•-••••'•• 7; •: ri a -row ef. ,.....;.:,-Z,,-,;.r.—/ 11 hi 0.1..11.11.•••-4. r1•I soi aro .........••••i NONA ear Veers roma : .01 .,.... J .c2 I:1 • •I••• I e .......1 VAN N Marion St__..____Aldo:E.._ t ° cl . \,,,13 ,, E ANN V II reor....neoi ...... •-. ....7 . ..„.... . -—2.2W—Sis,r i .,-- 13 ff` ..../.... .------ ''' '' •/.21,B.E.• ...... -- .._ -- , I. N 2nel St i i• ' AN st..7 .1i, tr : ' or _. RIO 46 a lig ......i.rm.. .I' ' . NAN•oNoWl:•..".• Fisk.Requeerrierit /1/ . ill CA !NANA, a Existing Imparvous Surfaca \ .....•••••• Ay it, 60o• y I ••••••......1•••••• ,....,... 1.4 b.. a.... Wes V. .... / _......'':i • ........sen. . /t 0,C•lro, MOM [1j 1. 1=1.7.'4" --14E-- ,,g Hydrant Requirement ..e /Proposed Impisrvious Surface 4.............• i/Vicinity Plan—... — OrtoNo•••lo•ON.. MANN 46.6.6 14: 1.1,NONNI,TM Yon Yo N NAN YANA IS•AN No, 1616 1•1•NoyoNlool INN On Now i • ;;•:62-'il••— -•Olt---•61 g AN' . Construction SequanC4 ...,...... ......pm. . /::::' 0 •ob....V••••••••••t•Ok.dow Arno 11.....t /lupe ious'Surface Subject to to-a.....a.404.4 von wl'••••••pool. 1 I V. Traffic . ./ ANNA.moof IN Now AN No• *ow CANA No No oN•o NAN to NAN No 1631 INN y Noir No yl NsoOt ONow on GOO,.wilt MOO.0 OrvOare Iwo to.bow avow.a woo,ANYI A • •.........•yy....••••• ....,......,s..n4•c.,...1.......ols WV , / OSTIA NANO ANINI., • i PION.NS Pe Y.. . • . a • ; • I ...a...~47..r....ay. / .........a.......• \-- . • ii // ill l• ,1.1.1.1.4 4;411/"Mr WYO. • . . . 4 • T. . I•••••••TO L' •F. - /.....,.manc.04 I - 1.4 1 inu...t. ;/I/ A•h Utility/ Drainage PI •L. , .. - ;. L - -- 1%14 NINNAN MANN gip AGNS IN a/ 1 _Olt_r___.1 '11 I NAY ANA ylloh• .t, loO•1.........,..s......y. -.......... * •eras., •/ ,,,,..ANON NO NMI*1.01.0044• Nv_x•ir.1 puma/ i/ 1.4 11.4.11.1 11!NA NON6M,/ANN& ANN ANN POW,MOAN. y IN INFONN iNINANY MINNA AIN OA 11 Wain.•r Ins ressonary NA NT NNW. ./ . I. i • Temp.Construction Approach (i)Sitt Fence Detail 4 i, . a...4 I • , . ' • • , • l•.1 ,_L _LA 7 . • . • V . T III • — -- . .. ...-- -- • — ............ • 4,.••••••Pa* .:t . • • '- - • 3 . . ill t . . , ..--.. .. - ...a ---. .. '...-zit,.• ! ... ... ,W..4-117.• •. . ..• ---- ,..... -I•1 • •9 ....... -...... ,-7-7•=7--.-7.-- -. . • ----- .... • • • : — --.... : i • . . .• . ••••-•-' --- ri .._ • . . • .4- :, km......fts.4./6.--.: . . t ....,..i I .. • ...._4. .o. [ .4 • • • :I•••••• . WI-1,P- --ItnifilL•-• _Ail ' . :i .,.....• ,,„ , . ..,„ ..- - IV ii- .7:".." ......:. • • -• ..• :t Si .. OW-*N.•••• . -----•—•—•_.......... 7 11 .I.' • -• — • I••• -—IL'-,ftr-.. i il •..•• I 111 ' •ft..4•1a••• • L 1 il U•1••••••..... il III \&ft.*•14•1•1 awe • Ilff.•RPM& . .- 1111• I '1 West glevation South ( Marion St. Elevation • .,1.1, 01.4.4.•i • Om. Ves1-• .•'- • . • 1 I 1'1' . i 1 1 • ti 'D . :t •. • 1 - I _ • rt 4...... p----r7'''77---. : . ., . . ••••., • I ,..-- i.......••--1 : • , al ... ••• : I . •••• . • . i i I . . : . . • • . 1 c' --—r— m.,... *...... ,v•. •;-.) ,. - • I., • • • • :t i• . I , , • • • . •%! • ! • • • 1 t ...... j II , . . . ! .11 •' ! i • , . • . • ---- 6•1••• -"'"--.• • ... . I . ' .....“ mma.m• •••••..........f.:::::77....7......t....„;•7. ow •• • .. ..... ... ...• i •1 • '..; ! ii ..... . . .....:';,11:',1 I ' , 1 I .—:4:2Fii-7,-•1-L----1. a 1 • • ' . . . • 3 r • ... •.•- —•—•—• - - -- •-•—i— •, , .• .040 Warn el ,••••••11.01~I Worn Nana \ POW,• III NO•441111••• v IVI•PrIllk \ • OM.•••• -•• • . 4 -IOW eras . ...._... , illiMipain1111 •NorttkElevation East Elevation ......•. • 11•14 4.•I• IIIIIIIIIIINI 1 . 11111iiiiiiskika kale.41 • . -r lie:ot... , OM MAO. I rm .1:V./NW•• e 3 1 • AmiPro* *4%54 Gkran. .0.4 1 •...4 V46.Pe' • ......//_I 1_1.-.a.// ,•rl...A fl it i £. 444141 w uwiw.,l.,l' 4444i.M.'M ��• mwuriI!illllllllI l ntimmIu • uofeneJI .o �• _1TL •� Y•M..11.\• •.W�I/a..Y A ..awO — y 4,� i ' . " --I •I rt- ' , i t i:: ",I�„ ._- - - ,.._ 1 •• L.•.o,%Ir%JO 1 _ ff.- i: ,--......... • 1 1 1 1 • ' _. .1.,IA 11s . 1., .,,I.I•.. 1 uol;enel3 (1s uoliew )i4;nos uol),enel3 ISoM r ..... ,..,. ,.'� a 11 ,.Q'+1: Iy . '—^ A .._. ....... • .. - ......__.._._. t• I+ - IA. I I ' l • • ..,__...--,. -7 . —• •••‘1..• I*:ft" i —IA•• tIrr•if--- • i .• ••:.• ' Alley 3/4 " • ' •-...1.7D2 . - . l . • : • 1..,•0 f• 2i I I • 2 ....• a• 1-- 4.,, .. ••••••••••••/•••rd :. .4.•••••••••.,• • •: . . .... • I> , .• ' .• ' i t - a: 1 I I • ... . aa••... 1i7,4---..0. ;:l I . , I I \ I i \ \ / (Pr•1/0040.ilin WI• -.--- - tit" -TA- . •• MAIM 1\ Wham. &10 • ••• i*Pt r I I' • _ I ! • AL • . • . • III I , • . .411/1::::‘,1 . . I 0 4 _ k , r 1------ --— • • •••••14••• 1 :;•4;.• !MI' / I • I .. IIIN•••••••• • I I I • I 1 3/411 • AP we.40. panel 10114.. i . .4 OWN PoPal. • ',AI / •lirI4 ow. • \ i 7i 1 . •_,_...1 . •• 1 I III' i • ' c110•11 II MAN 1 I 7717- II • / • I • . • / PAL 10410 $41. .. lOrriira - e . 1 IN il 141111.4.448 2 LW 41 • 1 I • . • . . OWL V••••••WO • ' -..L.S11.1 1 - -% . t. 't 1-- . . . 1 % . / , LP.PAWL• I • 1 _. I / ...4.014.4rnualear••• . -1 • -I - I voar.44 warao.am. 4 • """*7.. . • i I / • , • • a k . •--we...a•PAA.sr/ • rem.**Iv , \ .I •• . . . ' , I I ....1 tr••••••• • 1 • II, I .140.1.1041; 0.. •• . I I U • i • •-•-- --•• \ ''' •.' i_f_412tE.flt--4 -74''• • •• • ATI:Itrar• -• ) I i a. I 1 044 I — r • ' .. •- - •--,--I 101.4./1•11a6POLG,1:S. -- 404.N1/./ •••4/1•0•11 /1 -....-- i- _ L. I-AJT-....• 4,.. —"04114*1 ,./. • Na PO4.1., V 41. a •oisvot • f •••4 Iv a: ' • ..zite .6. • 2 it • -r .. 1 ttarir.. --.. •a• ''.."..1!: :-:- -1_ • • L---- i -----7- _._ • 4 . ....... rt 4" • • ;: vtt. #• =--f _ ..3 •4•' niit b' ..... gate /-• • -a •l', . A• ' . • N. . • i *Ay., fn. I , IJ,114411144 1Ie0 .0 MAL•11041, +i••••••••.40115 — . • .1 ri-I-PT. . .4_1__-— • • . • . ' :II I I .: : I •,.. . ..., IF* .. ,..........„ ,:. . \.a.......... . ..„,... ...,.4,,&mow ...,:o.a a•aan,I I .... .. 4We ritg• i Vita' II. * • — --- awt44' 4---- .— 4 ., • . . N.Marion Street _ •.. ____...___ i Au Mezzanine Plan • oh fi 2 1Tfloor Plan I, Iv!....,,,,..:.• . . Iv••••• ••I 1111•4 1...... .I • . •2 r. rC,a CITY „IF RENTON ..� � Planning/Building/PublicWorks Department Jesse Tarn er,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator ME y 14, 2002 Mr, Neal Thompson sI 0,,' �c1A� D. Rc ger H. Newell, AIA (/"" 1132— 19th Avenue East SE attle, WA 98112 SUBJECT: Joos Storage Building Project No. LUA-02-006,CU-H,ECF Dc ar Mr.Thompson: Ti-is letter is to inform you that the appeal period has ended for the Environmental Review Cc mmittee's (ERC) Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the above-referenced project. Nc appeals were filed. The applicant must comply with all ERC Mitigation Measures. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner in the Council Chambers on the sEventh floor of City Hall, on May 21, 2002 at 9:00 AM to consider the proposed Conditional Use Permit. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hE aring. A copy of the staff report is enclosed. If iou have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (425) 430-7270. For the Environmental Review Committee, JE.son ordan A:;sociate Planner E iclosure cc: Mr. Paul N.Joos/Owner -F1'ALLETfER R E N T O N 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 AHEAD OF THE CURVE This paper contains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the_ / t day of W1All , 2002, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope co tainin documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing I)Cut!— 4/. Jo U S ()L.-0)Uu 111 es-0 d7) 4-6P/;69,-/A,1-- /(6/1,-/- c-+ .wr._h__ni Yid (Signature of Sender) ` 4 MARILYN i'W £..I,EI-F { NOTARY PUBLIC ► STATE OF WASHINGTON ) STATE OF WASHINGTON SS COMMISSION EXPIRES COUNTY OF KING ) ( JUNEJUNE29, 2003 I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that c r�� -e 1J G?,rr 4� signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. �N Dated:7'n g-f8- /S, cDZODd / o ? 9/1 LC, Notary Public i nd for the State of W A a gton Notary(Print) RILYN KAMCHEFF My appointment expi 9-03 Project Name: jOnS .6&(,; f ; Project Number: �U d2 -& t, (J H( Cf NOTARY DOC NoncE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: JOOS STORAGE BUILDING PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-02.066,CU-H,ECF The applicant a requesting Environmental(SEPA)Review and a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit for the construction of a storage buildings located within the CA zoning designation.The building Is proposed to have a footprint of 7,605 square feel with a mezzanine level of 2509 square feel totaling 10,114 gross square feet of building area.The structure is planned to be approximately 28 feet in height upon completion. The development includes street frontage Improvements,on-site landscaping,and 3 internal parking spaces. With the development of the storage building,the applcant would demolish an existing 1,230 square loot single-family house end 360 square foot detached garage currently located on site. Access to the storage builoing would be provided from North Marion Street with additional alley access located directly adjacent to the northern property boundary. Construction Improvements are anticipated to begin H the summer of 2002.Location:1532 North Marlon Street. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed In writing on or before 5:00 PM May 19,2002.Appeals must be filed In writing together with the required 575.00 application lee with:Hearing Examiner,City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.13 Additional Information repenting the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office,(425)430-6510. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at hie regular meeting In the Council Chambers on the 7th floor of City Hall,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,Washington,on May 21,2002 at 9:00 AM to consider the propsoed Conditional U.Permit. II the Environmental Determination Is appealed,the appeal will be heard as pert of this public hearing. y i 1. / 7 J .i • Cl..-'7 Jr r - ' Iclnit Plan ""r7.":= FOR FURTHER INFORMATION,PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON,DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT(425)430-7219. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please Include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file Identification. MARILYN KAMCHEFF NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF WASHINGTON CERTIFICATION COMMISSION EXPIRES JUNE 29, 2003 I, Eua OCk\N ,U\ , hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document were posted by me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on PTV'\\ )5 i D.0 Signed')') 4114di ATTEST:Subscribed an worn before me,a Notary Public,in and for th State of Washington residing it 9-,tif f ,on the I `f"• day of 7"1 p-v c:20 0a' MARILYN KAMCHEFF MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES:6-29-03 2i) City of RE--) Department of Planning/Building/Public l......s ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ILA COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 4, 2002 APPLICATION NO: LUA02-006, U- , ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 28,2002 APPLICANT: Neil Thompson PROJECT MANAGER: Jason Jordan PROJECT TITLE: Joos Storage Building , WORK ORDER NO: 78936 LOCATION: 1532 N. Marion Street SITE AREA: 10,145 sf I BUILDING AREA(gross): 10,114 sf SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL:The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit for the construction of a self-storage buildings located within the CA zoning designation. The building is proposed to have a footprint of 7,605 square feet with a mezzanine level totaling 10,114 gross square feet of building area. The project is planned to be approximately 28 feet in height upon completion. The development includes street frontage improvements, on-site landscaping, and 3 internal parking spaces. With the development of the self-storage building, the applicant would demolish the existing single-family residence. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic./Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet oS C.5 all nwa th ablach e c/, B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where addition fI information is needed to properly assess this proposal. C- a»AL) s��y oz Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Routing Rev.10/93 PROJECT LUA 02-006, CU-H, ECF Joos Storage Building City of Renton Department of Planning/ Building/ Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET (Continuation) POLICE RELATED COMMENTS .05 Police Calls for Service Estimated Annually CONSTRUCTION PHASE To protect materials and equipment it is recommended that all materials and tools be locked up when not in use. The site will need security lighting and any construction trailer should be completely fenced in with portable chain-link fencing. The fence will provide both a physical and psychological barrier to any prospective thief and will demonstrate that this area is private property. Construction trailers should be kept locked when not in use, and should also have a heavy-duty deadbolt installed with no less then a 1-1/2"throw when bolted. Glass windows in the trailer should be shatter-resistant. I also recommend the business post the appropriate"No Trespassing" signs on the property while it's under construction(flier attached). This will aid police in making arrests on the property after hours if suspects are observed vandalizing or stealing building materials. The use of off-duty police officers or private security guards to patrol the site during the hours of darkness is also recommended. COMPLETED BUILDING One of the most common occurring problems at self-storage facilities are locks being cut on the storage units themselves. Access is gained either by following customers onto the property or by scaling the fence that may be surrounding the storage complex. Theft from storage units can be deterred by explaining to customers the disadvantages in letting unknown individuals onto the property. And to also invest in a good lock. Landscaping around the exterior of the building should not be too dense or high. It is important to allow visibility. Too much landscaping will give the building the look of a fortress and possibly give a burglar sufficient coverage to break into the buildings, especially during the hours of darkness. zL çTrespass : .. .. BUSINESS Enforcement WATCH Quite often, business owners and managers are faced with crimes that occur on the property after the businesses are closed and the employees have gone home. Some of the crimes that occur are burglary, vandalism, graffiti, trespassing, drug dealing and robbery in the parking lots. There is a way for police and business owners to discourage these types of crimes from taking place on private property, and that is by enforcing the City of Renton's Municipal Trespass Code 6-18-10. In order for police to be able to make an arrest for Trespass, business owners or managers need to purchase signs and display them in conspicuous areas on the property. These signs need to include the following language: 1. Indicate that the subject property is privately owned and; 2. Uninvited presence on the specified property is not permitted during the hours the business is closed, and; 3. Violators will be subject to criminal sanctions pursuant to Renton City Code 6-18-10. MOST IMPORTANTLY-THE SIGNS SHOULD BE CONSPICUOUS FROM ALL POSSIBLE POINTS OF ENTRY TO THE PROPERTY,AND ALSO BE PLACED ON THE EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDINGS. This way when a suspect is arrested, he/she will not be able to claim as a defense that he/she did not know he or she was trespassing. EXAMPLES FOR TRESPASS SIGNS: NO TRESPASSING NO TRESPASSING This is private property. Persons without specific No Trespassing after business hours business are not authorized to be on the premises (insert specific times). Anyone on the between the hours of(insert the hours your business is premises after business hours is subject closed). to arrest and/or citation for Criminal Violators are subject to arrest and/or citation for Trespass and/or impoundment of criminal Trespass pursuant to Renton City Code #6-18- vehicle. Per Renton City Code #6-18- 10.. 10. By enforcing the Trespass Ordinance,business owners and police will be sending a message to criminals that they are not allowed to conduct criminal activity on the property. In making arrests for Trespass, police may be preventing the more serious crimes from taking place. cti�Yo� COURTESY OF RENTON POLICE DEPARTMENT CRIME PREVENTION UNIT 430 - 7521 I N II\- CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING MAY 21, 2002 AGENDA COMMENCING AT 9:00 AM, COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 7TH FLOOR, RENTON CITY HALL The apf lication(s) listed are in order of application number only and not necessarily the order in which they will be I eard. Items will be called for hearing at the discretion of the Hearing Examiner. PROJECT NAME: Joos Storage Building PROJE CT NUMBER: LUA-02-006, ECF, CU-H PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and a Hearing Examin or Conditional Use Permit for the construction of a storage building located within the CA zoning designa ion. The building is proposed to have a footprint of 7,605 square feet with a mezzanine level of 2,509 square feet totaling 10,114 gross square feet of building area. The structure is planned to be approxir lately 28 feet in height upon completion. The development includes street frontage improvements, on-site landscaping, and 3 internal parking spaces. With the development of the storage building the applicant would demolish an existing 1,230 square foot single-family house and 360 square foot det.tched garage currently located on site. Access to the storage building would be provided from North M 3rion Street with additional alley access located directly adjacent to the northern property boundai y. Construction improvements are anticipated to begin in the summer of 2002. Location: 1532 Marion ;>treet. hexagend, City of Renton Pt JBL I C Department of Planning/Building/Public Works HEARING PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: Pubic Hearing Date: May 21, 2002 Projt act Name: Joos Storage Building Owner Paul N, Joos Add,ess 13510 SE 50th Place Bellevue,WA 98006 Appel,:ant/Contact Neal Thompson Addr 9ss: Roger H. Newell, AIA 1102 19th Avenue East Seattle,WA 98112 File I lumber: LUA-02-006, CU-H, ECF Project Manager: Jason E.Jordan • Projt ct Description: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit for the construction of a storage building located within the CA zoning designation. The building is proposed to have a footprint of 7,605 square feet with a mezzanine level of 2,509 square feet totaling 10,114 gross square feet of building area. The structure is planned to be approximately 28 feet in height upon completion. The development includes street frontage improvements, on-site landscaping, and 3 internal parking spaces. With the development of the storage building, the applicant would demolish an existing 1,230 square foot single-family house and 360 square foot detached garage currently located on site. Access to the storage building would be provided from North Marion Street with additional alley access located directly adjacent to the northern property boundary. Construction improvements are anticipated to begin in the summer of 2002. Project Location: 1532 Marion Street / / / / P.acme KMwordA Truck►t.at \ I / Ito P � I J w Ito �a a �-. \ M 4l_ n IN • •••••w CA O s a a� o a .� �i� OW Nov-r n i o 1.," i 0.„:. r o Q:I❑ i LI \ ^ C v.4-4, `p p ❑ / - 1 am...fumy M Ora St F t "a::":/ z ❑ Q' cNr,,uw.o ❑ laa tw A ee r....:..r.i.1 .".w p / ❑ tf [rook. C r wt OS.a `- q w,6 r um. a . / iii N2nd St �� C 6.00 y 1Ti " O ..,,.N d City of Renton P/B/PW Department liminary Report to the Hearing Examiner Joos Storage Building LUA-02-006, CU-H, ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE May 21,2002 Page 2 of 7 B. EXHIBITS: Exhibit 1: Project file ("yellow file") containing the application, reports, staff comments, and other material pertinent to the review of the project. Exhibit 2: Site& Landscaping Plan (dated 3/27/02) Exhibit 3: Vicinity& Utility Drainage Plan (dated 1/17/02) Exhibit 4: Building Elevations Plan (dated 3/27/02) Exhibit 5: Floor Plan (dated 4/27/02) Exhibit 6: Zoning Map (dated 2/01) C. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: Paul N, Joos 13510 SE 50th Place Bellevue,WA 98006 2. Zoning Designation: Commercial Arterial (CA) 3. Comprehensive Plan Employment Area - Commercial Land Use Designation: 4. Existing Site Use: Single Family Residence 5. Neighborhood Characteristics: North: Commercial Arterial (CA) zoning East: Commercial Arterial (CA) zoning South: North Marion Street; Commercial Arterial (CA) zoning West: Commercial Arterial (CA) zoning 6. Access: North Marion Street & 16-foot public alley 7. Site Area: 10,145 square feet (0.23 acres) 8. Project Data: area comments Existing Building Area: 1,590 sf Existing single family residence and detached garage (to be demolished) New Building Area: 10,114 sf Storage building Total Building Area: 10,114 sf N/A hexrpt.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department &liminety Report to the Hearing Examiner Joos Storage Building LUA-02-006, CU-H, ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE May 21,2002 Page 3 of 7 D. HISTORICAL/BACKGROUND: Action Land Use File No. Ordinance No. Date Annexation N/A 156 05/18/1909 Comprehensive Plan N/A 4498 02/20/1995 Zoning N/A 4404 06/07/1993 E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE: 1. Chapter 2 Land Use Districts Section 4-2-020: Purpose and Intent of Zoning Districts Section 4-2-070: Zoning Use Table Section 4-2-120: Commercial Development Standards 2. Chapter 3 Environmental Regulations and Special Districts Section 4-3-050: Critical Areas Regulations 3. Chapter 4 Property Development Standards Section 4-4-030: Development Guidelines and Regulations Section 4-4-060: Grading, Excavation and Mining Regulations Section 4-4-080: Parking, Loading and Driveway Regulations Section 4-4-130: Tree Cutting and Land Clearing Regulations 4. Chapter 6 Streets and Utility Standards Section 4-6-060: Street Standards 5. Chapter 9 Procedures and Review Criteria 6. Chapter 11 Definitions F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: 1. Land Use Element: Employment Area objectives and policies. G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit approval for the construction of 10,114 square foot storage building to be located at 1532 North Marion Street. The subject site is located within the Commercial Arterial (CA) zoning designation and Employment Area—Commercial (EAC) Comprehensive Plan Area. The site currently contains a 1,590 square foot single family residence and detached garage, which is proposed to be demolished with this application. In its place, the applicant is proposing to construct a one-story storage building with a mezzanine level. The ground floor is proposed to be 7,605 square feet and the mezzanine level is designed to be 2,509 square feet. The structure is planned to be approximately 28 feet in height and would provide three interior parking stalls. Storage buildings, located within the Commercial Arterial zone, require a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit. Staff has reviewed the project's compliance with the Commercial Arterial (CA) development standards, which is addressed in the remaining portions of this preliminary report to the Hearing Examiner. 2. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.21C, 1971 as amended) on April 23, 2002 the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the Joo's storage building Conditional Use Permit. . The DNS- M included 4 mitigation measures. A 14-day appeal period commenced on April 29, 2002 and ended on May 13, 2002. No appeals of the threshold determination were filed. hexrpt.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department rliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner Joos Storage Building LUA-02-006, CU-H, ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE May 21,2002 Page 4 of 7 3. COMPLIANCE WITH ERC MITIGATION MEASURES Based on an analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) issued the following mitigation measures with the Determination of Non- Significance—Mitigated: 1. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations contained within the Geotechnical Report prepared by Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc. dated April 11, 2001 with regard to site preparation, grading, structural fill, foundations, and drainage. The satisfaction of this requirement shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of building and construction permits for the project. 2. The applicant shall install and maintain the temporary erosion control measures to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project: 3. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee based on a rate of $0.52 per square foot of new commercial building area and is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. 4. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Traffic Mitigation Fee based on a rate of$75.00 per new trip generated by the project prior to the issuance of building permits. 4. STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS Representatives from various city departments have reviewed the application materials to identify and address site plan issues from the proposed development. These comments are contained in the official file, and the essence of the comments has been incorporated into the appropriate sections of this report and the Departmental Recommendation at the end of the report. 5. CONSISTENCY WITH CONDITIONAL USE CRITERIA: Section 4-9-030.G lists 11 criteria that the Hearing Examiner is asked to consider, along with all other relevant information, in making a decision on a Conditional Use application. These include the following: (1) CONSISTENCY WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, ZONING CODE & OTHER ORDINANCES: The proposed use shall be compatible with the general purpose, goals, objectives and standard of the Comprehensive Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and any other plan, program, map or ordinance of the City of Renton. (a) Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element The subject site is designated Employment Area - Commercial (EA-C) on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. The objective for the EA-C, as stated in the Comprehensive Plan, is to provide for commercial and residential uses requiring large amounts of land and/or high visibility and access to large volumes of automobile traffic in areas outside of Centers and the Center Downtown (Objective LU-EEa). In this case, the applicant is requesting approval to construct a commercial storage building, which requires high visibility. Therefore, this proposal is generally consistent with the policies established by the City's Comprehensive Plan. (b) Zoning Code The proposed use is located within the Commercial Arterial (CA) zoning designation. The proposed storage building is permitted in the CA zone with approval of a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit. (c) Development Standards The Commercial Arterial (CA) development standards require a 10 front yard setback (North Marion Street) along with a 10 landscaping strip to be located in the setback area. No additional rear or side yard setbacks are required unless the site is abutting or hexrpt.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Iliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner Joos Storage Building LUA-02-006, CU-H, ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE May 21,2002 Page 5 of 7 adjacent to a residentially zoned property. The CA limits building coverage to 75% with structured parking. Height is limited to 50 feet within the zone. The proposed storage building has been designed to meet the minimum development standards established in the CA zone. Specifically, the development includes a 10-foot landscaping setback along its south property line (adjacent to North Marion Street). The building, as proposed, would maximize the allowed lot coverage by developing the site at a 75% building lot coverage. Finally, the height of the proposed structure is 28 feet, which is below the maximum allowed (50 feet). (2) COMMUNITY NEED: There shall be a community need for the proposed use at the proposed location. In the determination of community need, the Hearing Examiner shall consider the following factors, among all other relevant information: (a) The proposed location shall not result in either the detrimental over concentration of a particular use within the City or within the immediate area of the proposed use. The proposed storage building is intended to serve the applicant and would not result in the detrimental over concentration of this use within the City or within the immediate area of the site. Moreover, the subject site is located in an increasing commercial area, where storage has become a necessity. As the subject site is only 0.23 acres in size and the proposed storage building is 10,114 square feet, the development is not expected to dramatically increase noise, odor or produce other adverse impacts to surrounding properties. (b) That the proposed location is suited for the proposed use. The proposed location is suitable for the proposed use in that the storage building is centrally located within a larger commercial area of the City and is not situated immediately adjacent to less intensive uses. The project's suitability at the proposed location has been considered, including impacts to earth and air, and has been addressed through appropriate Environmental Review conducted prior to this report. (3) EFFECT ON ADJACENT PROPERTIES: The proposed use at the proposed location shall not result in substantial or undue adverse effects on adjacent property. The following site requirements shall be required: (a) Lot Coverage: Lot coverage shall conform to the requirements of zone in which the proposed use is to be located. The CA zone has a maximum building coverage of 75% for a parcel, when structured parking is provided. As proposed, the building would provide structured parking and the lot coverage would total approximately 75% of the total lot area. However, the applicant has proposed an articulated roof structure, which helps to visually reduce the size of the storage structure. (b) Yards: Yards shall conform to the requirements of the zone in which the proposed use is to be located. Additions to the structure shall not be allowed in any required yard. The CA zone requires a minimum front yard street setback of 10 feet and no other setbacks unless the subject property is located adjacent or abutting a residentially zoned parcel. In this case, the subject site is not situated adjacent or abutting a residentially zoned property. The proposed storage building would maintain a 10-foot front yard setback adjacent to North Marion Street. (c) Height: Building and structure heights shall conform to the requirements of the zone in which the proposed use is to be located. Spires, bell towers, public utility antennas or similar structure may exceed the height requirement upon approval of a variance. Building heights should be related to surrounding used in order to allow optimal sunlight and ventilation, and minimal obstruction of views from adjacent structures. hexrpt.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department rliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner Joos Storage Building LUA-02-006, CU-H, ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE May 21,2002 Page 6 of 7 The CA zone establishes a maximum building height of 50 feet for development located within this zone. As noted previously, the proposed structure has been designed with an overall height of approximately 28 feet, which is well below the maximum height allowed. (4) COMPATIBILITY: The subject property is located within a predominantly commercial/industrial area and is surrounded by commercial and industrial buildings. The storage building would be screened by landscaping along the southern property boundary adjacent to North Marion Street. The neighboring properties include a used car sales and service shop, commercial office building, auto repair shop, and the Seattle Opera Warehouse. Therefore, staff considers the proposed storage building to be compatible with the existing uses within the immediate vicinity of the project. (5) PARKING: Parking under the building structure should be encouraged. Lot coverage may be increased to as much as seventy-five percent (75%) of the lot coverage requirement of the zone, in which the proposed use is located, if all parking is provided underground or within the structure. The parking regulations require one parking stall per 3,500 square feet of storage area. As the project would total approximately 10,114 square feet 3 parking stalls would be required (3,500 / 10,114 = 2.89). As proposed, the storage building includes three structured parking stall located near the northern entrance to the building. The stalls would be accessed from the 16-foot public alley located behind the structure adjacent to the northern property line. (6) TRAFFIC: Traffic and circulation patterns of vehicles and pedestrians relating to the proposed use and surrounding area shall be reviewed for potential effects on, and to ensure safe movement in the surrounding area. Access to the site is proposed from two locations. Access to the rear (northern) area of the proposed structure is planned from Factory Place North and then to a 16-foot public alley. The interior parking stalls would also be accessed from the alley and have been designed to include the 24 feet of back-out distance required by code. The development has been designed to allow individuals entering from the rear of the building to park in designated parking stalls, while they deliver or pick-up their stored items. Access is also planned from North Marion Street, which would also provide vehicular access to the front (southern) portion of the structure. This access point has been designed to allow customers to park on a concrete drive located in front of the building while they deliver or pick-up stored items. Finally, the applicant has incorporated a defined pedestrian connection from North Marion Street to the main entrance of the building. This would ensure safe pedestrian access to and from the building. Staff does not anticipate this proposal would create any negative impacts to existing traffic or pedestrians circulation patterns as vehicular and pedestrian access has been adequately addressed. (7) NOISE, GLARE: Potential noise, light and glare impacts shall be evaluated based on the location of the proposed use on the lot and the location of on-site parking areas, outdoor recreational areas and refuse storage areas. Short-term noise impacts are likely to occur from the initial construction of the projects. The applicant's construction mitigation plan, as well as existing code provisions limiting construction work hours, will serve to mitigate these impacts. Once completed, the proposed use is not anticipated to increase noise and glare impacts significantly over existing commercial conditions in the vicinity. Furthermore, the applicant has designed the structure to include indoor parking, which should mitigate noise impacts associated hexrpt.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Jliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner Joos Storage Building LUA-02-006, CU-H, ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE May 21,2002 Page 7 of 7 with customer deliveries and pick-ups. Finally, the proposed structure has been designed to be approximately 28 feet in height, which should not cast expansive shadows over existing commercial structures located on neighboring properties. (8) LANDSCAPING: Landscaping shall be provided in all areas not occupied by building or paving. The Hearing Examiner may require additional landscaping to buffer adjacent properties from potentially adverse effects of the proposed use. The CA zone requires a 10-foot landscaping setback along the property's street frontage, which in this case is the southern property boundary adjacent to North Marion Street. The landscaping proposed to be located within the planting strip would consist of Downy Clematis, Creeping St. Johnswort and Vinca Minor. However, in order to augment the proposed landscaping and enhance the site design, staff recommends the applicant be required to plant three Vine Maple trees or acceptable substitutes within the 10-foot landscape setback. This in turn would provide a better screen to adjacent properties along North Marion Street, while also softening the overall appearance of the proposed structure. (9) ACCESSORY USES: Accessory uses to conditional uses such as day schools, auditoriums used for social and sport activities, health centers, convents, preschool facilities, convalescent homes and others of a similar nature shall be considered to be separate uses and shall be subject to the provisions of the use district in which they are located. The proposed primary use of the site, as a storage building, requires approval of a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit. There are no accessory uses included with the proposal. (10) CONVERSION: No existing building or structure shall be converted to a conditional use unless such building or structure complies, or is brought into compliance, with the provisions of this Chapter. The subject site is currently developed with a single family residence and detached garage that is proposed to be demolished. The conversion of existing buildings is not included with the proposal. (11) PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS: The proposed use and location shall be adequately served by and not impose an undue burden on any public improvements, facilities, utilities, and services. Approval of a conditional use permit may be conditional upon the provision and/or guarantee by the applicant of necessary public improvements, facilities, utilities, and/or services. No street improvements are required as part of the proposal. The applicant may be required to extend a water main from Houser Way North to the western property boundary, depending on fire flow requirements. All other public utilities are currently sufficient to serve the proposed developments associated with this use. G. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit for the Joos Storage Building to be located at 1532 North Marion Street, Project File No. LUA-02-006, CU-H, ECF, subject to the following condition: 1. The applicant shall be required to provide three Vine Maple trees or acceptable substitutes, a minimum of 20 feet on center, within the 10-foot landscaping setback adjacent to North Marion Street. The satisfaction of this requirement shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of the Final Occupancy Permit. hexrpt.doc • I 7 • •—-77. -- Ailey . • . _ 1 I 1 'Project Data •.,,,,•..ligate4.1161.1101NOT •. .. Pager.•••••• itle.0..e..., --1-0- . .......... * .. .5513.115.5 1 '\1 st4* -7--.. —7-rm-.? ,-•1..•P.1 ••• 1 • 0.- 2 ,• . • • : It I....... \1 .0. 40,0' 71r,';•""at. .4 I ..........•,,, i I : -..-.0.4. ms,..v-2 • do 1 l' • .....,,.. I I.124.1 PM . I ' 0)II -axis...1w.F... . ... — ..... ,44.....7.--,-- . 1 ..15. D.41 . . . -1 5....M. . ' ,— • —(,)e...,,k. e......ID .... ........ PO OD./ • ......,,,k..,, • 126.1•0411143 I 1.4" . IIVAL.1 Zoning Code I ., . A .. .--„,:-1 ,„„. ,..............., • ',e_,.....1 1 . Lo.a 44.MC•10..IF ' rs•%in , N 5.;r ,,......... WM 1....• • , .,,,, ........ N bp 0 so. ar.Tio7..4.) t't 1 III ZI ,........... •?,-7..,.:,^ "'" I. 1 ., It • i ,,,, Iptai .0.crial .. s,..W •- ,st, SY(NI Ir I. I I ir. .... ID I . t4ev Seu.5r..,svr-e 10F04,e a ii ie• 1....... . NM I•555 5,) . . P...V.I.. 4,• 1 10 7 MO SF Sit. 1 1.2 VI.el M.. lA•dr Oanot..tVal ',1 NI..6... tie c....c.... is Is I.F.O. Pl.CO., t.,• -; 4 .. 12 1 P,\- ,-..N, •I.4.4...,,, " -• -a 'Building Data ....,... ,..,,,.. -; r-_ ____, ; .... I . .................. V-I Pisur 0..../ u.,......, I 94150.1.• t5.1 . 111. I I I .., I N... . . I L__ Legal Description .,. I =_14.-_".-A-_--1.7.-_t--4-_-_1:._- , Lat SS.24.51.12......lb R.I. • ,,I. Dr 0*re....,..•15 el a 5.1...... --—7 i...1...47 Kr.Cs..... • _, ..... ---•is osnewir I / ' L. Index to Drawings . .......,-2 n, 50 P.ts.......... ,— —+— ,.. • A.2 f ntl NM,',..P‘,.. 111":" .."---i:.-----rig;f.itV... .-7?4 4.3 N 5 5,W E1.1.11.• AI VP,MIN U.,11...•1..eel D.. : 4- -----!113(... ... .., • itsn ,e.,' • 16 4 I •• ,.. ••-••• 1, tt..rwr,..„;.t., .• P.'. • • . . .......-2 i L....1-i ••:',:'4.;.,•;::Elaillr-- -,-.1- .. . . Key • • • .s, • ' ' ' ' • ;.:. . •.:•••...• ., er.'Ne.....tr.....Tr".-0,d,..>.,,, ,. *•• , , . :: -.: :. ,............) :,,... ,4,/,'',. .i_J- •P.044.......:.•“....••••••{,..,1•••. fr.1•••..0,...,•,;4r.c 7.,*; • . ,. ., • I. 1 ., • .... •1:••.......14... co.....,,,,..44,,,.4"re.,•a'0.c., 4 .• 0•111A.0%7p.. , /,1...'•ft sea•IA.;;.•:4‘ II; 4.,,..,, .,-c. , .=•,-,•••.•i. . . . .. . ............. ••:•11 . . . . .. . • • .• , / 1 :•_ • 1. ..,. r• ..p/••• • • ,;(;• ./.,...:•. r<, . • //../..., r•=,.• - ,.....! .."..i .7, , • ___;??' ....../ ,.••••.././ .— — 1411.41' I I 4s..e.S.41.10... Daft.....0.____LE r:." 1•' ry. roC.I. le. ..•I, . . ,.:.ti. 4. Is'-**4-- I N.Marion Street . •- Site13 Plan /Landscaping Plan . —1. li .4 le w e-41. -7. ./ AN .rm;. CA '• N• 7,1'f,! / / P.cc•r K•nworlh Truck►l•nl „: w• wet J.nwNI / N•IK St �� vT w..•.a CA ra.......+r �:f. w••••••oir Ma. // 0 Ct/ / es RFt:r ale ilizi a w. ❑a a—p •! W u a W. I • Q ❑ P C1 p' • P ❑ 11 \ '�a .`lail/. \P ❑ �'4 9999g0C ` w-wr wow. \—�—_..._.._.__ _ .. .....ram. 'r•.•_ ti�."=- ///.. / •'w7'�'Bt tM E� ,I III meal...a W.A.,-. --- Mt seam--- .—.wer•ee ❑ ❑ II II • : i p" 9 •e.. 3 .(9 Q Brooks a •.•.1 v.. / i ,...r new w 4. - ../.. .N.Marion St.---•--_ K_•....__ t / ❑ ic news �'-- -- --__... ------:.--.--.___-- -.---' / ' / —. N] dSt 1..t•I. �1. '•„•."•,"••,"•." Fuehow Rpuwam•ril '��� —• [111011C.... �� A O II��� \ ,Existing impen,u.Surface •• i„>i. ,.„•, fJill �� \ ^ q.... Y.w y ..waiwwwr x.w /�O.I WT N Hydrant Rpuvammt 2 Proposeolm r „ •�^;-^�"""—" •/• Vicinity Plan p.N..•Surface / Construction Sequence Imp. wus Surtac.Subject to sow,.,;,,,,,,...wsn y.o,,.•,,....r.. •' •; la-.n/ ca .,•wl.o+v./,r..r.•�., .% Vets Traffic .r wise ` / c_�.due.unw set wee: a '. "".•'. f,Wkl Leith s„,'.•.,.n,+�.•.�w ...w.r a..e ' w rrr,.. \ / • / ... •a.. \ • \ I •r•.�.oµiro w OA• /vi.i • et t p •••I • • �i� Utility/ Drainage PI ' ••i ' _' -_ °c ° „�.. i".v-o ~--�y A- - 7------y...._4 ... 7£YtIFi7f rnv..r.s.c • • ..e xYM.I•Mil WNW IIMu.wY. K•V.T,gl a,tO.J •.a swum*wee.IN.P•w,••••••T•6106. M-('a.....•ar S..••-• D. ••M•••.h'!.e W•h.•• .n•.•a••w.... ►..Y.,. .••e I•.••.MT.•.4IT taw.. n,..•`1 jiLi Temp.Construction Approach Silt Fence Detail 4 i 6 p • ill _. ..._ .MY....Y..N S•I 'n! all f _L 1_ --- ----- -- --- ------- --- ---- tamer i i ; a.., : sV,w -----------I I ` I IC iiie aorpe I� --� I t'all r IIP4. :.P. Oh. -� aI .-�- -_—�I 1 �7MOMMOS I. a _ i` —T r.r _ . 1„.• A iiFi 11.......16 wll..• it Q�P I i..nw..--..I.,eMoo op Mloo. 13 West Elevation South ( Marion St.) Elevation Oil I I 1 i 12[1,j j I I I• ti • il ..w+. — ww.r .' 1 t 4 y �1► j... .., • — ... .._ _. .._-.._ ... . I II. a IM.Mmomo AMA Pi I \.n. mw ...�'.---- ...----t J: Y n M f -WO Memos I t 1! kJc+#h E1".�F47.� fl j�ln:u n Mp 1.1 V.%, • :I East Elevation II1iii1!ILiiil • ,Mjj•tI -+1 li,„,,......, , 3,..,. .�,V.,. x.., v.`. i-o" • AMY • ar• „ ,a•{j•.1•000.r.r wr/1 • 1 I i -..,l��/�Owr.•a r �, _ _ � /...... II 1 .— _--_—__— _--_..._ ..�. ti-- _ Ov1 f1 I` {II • i 1,... .•w,> L.c:.u.• 1 1 e S ..0 , ` \\ /e. ' I Iwq�w.rr.rMd-) ! I mood _ _ ^ .-� t �1 snow y •yia . Y 1 1 /•r.r YYIr 1. IjT ; 0 • MS l'j— •' _----_ I , ' or aY•fp• am Yost If iii I iI II ii ^• ...TOW I i --I • I1ptI t i • /,..AK..IOOO a• Z _I I Va.114ILLY w.*0 ,I • � I 1 . 1 L.t.i I. 1 If•.•0.•.wa.a • -Y ,' oW I I • 1•n.,wluL.re•,Tvw irL•••w I _ -4 / { ? _ 1 µ a..w,. .x-'�' I • 0 Nw :..mwr •er ___ _ } Mx.' Y.I.:.—I i I. +wW w. rs worts • il ...-vi-- .IL______./i . Y I ,ii 40-0' 11!.... •• • . i -t-+ ---- --- N._Marion Street __.. . . __.— 2 . Mezzanine Plan l Firstrloor Plan •�. , 71)Wti H°.ILO' E ., -i- #5 E4 . 8 T23N R5E W 1/2 .- O O O O :, - -- -., .I — — �. R-10 U ( r� VQ • /- Ea CA R_lo �--s as o o s� i CA P) , CO CO CO CO co ii 2 C R-10 IL vi 871 - 7--I. °t z ao � : : w R-8� ao > k c-0 . • p ao m ›. R-8 R=10(P) - of c c co Qom., -0 c 0 O ►. CA N t` o o R-8 8 a� R-8 0o i C A C , ce N 2 id St. ---a -a--a- d / M R�8' ,i,.N co n -CD6 Mal / CA ►►n y.� ; r4, • A -10 )dot` ° CD Cl a _ 611 ` CA11. y w CD CD CD D z M S 2nd St CD CDC❑RCP) N H - q �\v CD , LI- CD^ CD ��� tC M,, P Rya CDR w�"� -fir�ia6/ ... /J _D_I —1CD 15D„,..) / CD C •• CD % RC _� CD CD CD` I \\ CD CD CDrn �., �.. CD CD a. S R_8 xt LA. c. ?" � �c, i cD�S (--- °° °' R 8 cu C/) • 1 ' o - \ \.....- RC(P) ---•I RM-U 1 71 C^ • �� I, 7 , o� , rico— co - , C •••••••••• • • U) m - I _ o G4 - 20 T23N R5E W 1/2 ? R 4Y 0 F4 0 ZONING 1:4800 it P/ `CAL SERVICES 17 T23N R5E W 1/2 Fo mum Z( PIING MAP BOC . • i. ,`, 92 ' ' 9 455 ` 459 a1 ,111irmnp•:or, l l I ammi :•;"---7 : ' , 1 110,---40,11114,114 .:::..:.: 0. 1111 1713 l'it,_414:- _, ,-----,,„ --,.. ,,‘. z 4)4 tit 1:' ' i 'wo tn., ir-410 se, iii . „:14.,,, .1:_, _..tr.4.,,,}4:,.%51 ;25 T2 :, 74N R4E D �a 94W\ . +► ..i; d11 ya I 1, (f . ra, ' . :'..° '464 ' It(' .-:-;:-. - .. -... '4.4. —. ' - -#t,\\C -..\ .._. ..,. , . elf. za14- L11itil1�eL, 36124N R4E 3'1 T24N R5E =' .� : . • , ;I' . 1 3• it �Hrh,� 307 t °• a ', 'M :ail ;. 01 �, r Clhlllf ,t L :'.' + :>:< � Gt1 T i��r'F,€' '\ 2r I .V. 1'�'c -c'k& 4'11 00R5E � 1 4 K. 1 \ 3. �•-11 ,e� ✓;:_ � � 3 2 T23N R5E ;14 �� ! �u.�.. !� w 1 l.,i7"\::: :' 4 /� h'��i�N _.� •;�-__.sue � '�I.•t ' F ,, , ��, -_: II N - s4 it I'I .IP ILLII _ hAtl it m 7 ,, , . ._G .�o 1. \.. x�,1', mil' , i i"' f?1 Lt•,' R 12 T23N R4E R Y• ' s 44�C�.- �L.�r essl 1, rli rr a°1E+ ic1 ��1�C:,,,-JIM '' �-�"' �� _ c •o lr 370 1; I a • 6 . .A I r h'a c/ 1, ...au ,... .,r_,1 .\�. 1.1____,,„ _ '�' ' J • - - 8 ` a"' " I►'14 114 n' III" .1er 6.-,A �.il 0. !• -r ,•,". I 4 fi?3N R•..A� 723N .r R? SDI :1 RSE ,- 1 4'•4i 1.' 114.7; t..IC334 a N. F v' 5 i ' 1�36(, ` ;, ; 371 - 81 --84 L ri, G V ` ILE `5. ' ,3T23NR4E' `Ct; T23N 2 i 1 $, 22 T23N RSEs'�` 23 T23N R5E _ 344 4'y7TF I F . :tl�i a� +�cx �+ - Y e A5 y 821 1 j • _�II "i1 � �`75( y_ 1 w�(fi �;'ri'r' � .eftrf Ne•'.. IH1 r tl` ' 2 _ r 1l . 'iw'. „ jlt 1_Iit' �,, ITT i .-.� Ai t1.i): -1` 't., .p ' 1 1 S •_ • �� -1• 6 s i y 1 '..1N it It- r7 �`ria 4 A,t*' 61T23N R4E,,, 21 „23l l R4E I o.• 3..,;•� .c rll '.r+�K `N R 'L_' ;` s„ ! l 25 _T �. -0 E.. ' . 1 1A.. I* li II ;1; s i'I • 1 825 C�` . .1 i VI 2 .11) i 4 .-,-A!, .'1721, -.1 IliFir' ik...v. g .I 36 3N Rat 1 .-1 •c RSE J if,-- Pi 3N rc11. 1 ; ( ► i 35 T23N s: 11 60.7 —)i--- 60 .I �. �.._ /1 60 J1_=a •10 t c � :.F 833 • N. 7 ,7 li:_ii'7,7-• ::.0,44,H, ,4":4-4.. J ...:-._______.::::„.:: . . _...... .::,:: :::............ . ___............... • 22N R4E 1-T22N R4 6 T22N- 2,�N: E P.:" y9& Rid - , 1111�•��ttttt mom _ _. ,: 2 T22N R5E KROLL 1 RC I Resource Conservation 1 CC Convenience Commercial fP1 Publicly Owned PAG E# I R-I 1 Residential 1 du/ac I CN Center Neighborhood' Renton City Limits r - Adjacent City Limits CS Center Suburban*R-5 I Residential 5 du/ac I -- SECTTOWN AGE R-8 1 Residential B du/ac 1 CD Center Downtown• I .x1 (Grey Text) Prezones RNH I Residential Manufactured Homes I CDR Center Office Residential I•;•;•;1 Automall District A 7. R-10 1 Residential 10 du/ac 1 CA Commercial Arterial ��ri Automall District B R-141 Residential 14 du/ac I CO Commercial Office • For additional regulations in overlay districts RK-lI Residential Multi-Family Infill I Di Industrial - Heavy not shown on this map, please see ILIAC 4-3. RN-NJ Residential Multi-Family Neighborhood Center I 1N Industrial - Medium PAGE RN-C 1 Residential Multi-Family Suburban Center I IL Industrial - Light INDEX k3 • e F RH-U1 Residential Multi-Family Urban Center* I P-1 Public Use 4 • .... ............................. ...................................... ....................................... CITY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION LIST OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS within 300 feet.ofahe subjectp..4e Joos Renton Storage PROJ=CT NAME: / � pNN�jvc I �Q APPLICATION NO: L� 02.-()go�(Li �/�1 , JS(-F ",F� 41901 The fc Ilowing is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. The Development Services Division will notify these individuals of the proposed development. NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER Tam, Hau Ming 314 Factory Avenue North, Renton, WA 98055 135230-1050-03 Tran, Dan Tuan 320 Factory Avenue North, Renton, WA 98055 _ 135230-1055-08 Chan, Weng + Sou Wan 1509 North Marion Street, Renton, WA 98055 135230-1060-01 Mitchell, Donald + Melissa M. 1515 North Marion Street, Renton, WA 98055 135230-1065-06 Arcarius Homes, LLC 6947 Coal Creek Parkway 135230-1066-05 Suite 257, Newcastle, WA 98059 Bui, Steven N + Kim L • 315 Factory Place North, Renton, WA, 98055 135230-1070-09 Pham, Kim Hanh Thi 308 Factory Avenue North, Renton, WA 98055 135230-1075-04 Berger, Christopher J. + Rhonda 410 Sunset Blvd North, Renton, WA 98055 135230-1086-01 Horsepian, Vahe + Sonia "PO Box 50322, Bellevue WA 98015 135230-1115-06 Masters, Shane P + Lisa M. 1510 North 3ro Street, Renton, WA 98055 135230-1120-09 Plute, James E. 7831 220th Street SW, Edmonds, WA 98026 135230-1125-04 Plute, James E. 7831 220t Street SW, Edmonds, WA 98026 135230-1130-07 Waltner, Earl + Elizabeth 1526 North 3ftl Street, Renton, WA 98055 135230-1135-02 Waltner, Earl + Elizabeth 1526 North 3`0 Street, Renton, WA 98055 135230-1140-05 Cho, Gyu Dong 1525 North 4`"Street, Renton, WA 98055 135230-1185-01 Seattle Opera Association PO Box.9248, Seattle, WA 98109 135230-1205-07 Francis and Buttnick, LLC 204 1st Avenue South, Seattle, WA 98104 135230-1225-03 Waldenburger, Friedel 345 North 3ftl Place, Renton, WA 98055 135230-1245-09 Tonda, Ernest J 528 Edmonds Avenue NE, Renton, WA 98056 135230-1265-04 _ Tonda, Ernest J 528 Edmonds Avenue NE, Renton, WA 98056 135230-1275-02 Joos, Paul N + Desnee M 13510 SE 5016 Place, Bellevue, WA 98006 135230-1285-00 Fakharzadeh, M Hadi PO Box 78404, Seattle, WA 98178 135230-1295-08 City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055 135230-1300-01 Burlington Northern Santa Fe ATTN: Property Tax 172305-9006-04 PO Box 96189, Fort Worth, TX 76161 Columbia& Puget Sound Ry 172305-9033-01 Company. .......................................... Santa, Mick C . 4905 116 Avenue SE, Bellevue, WA 98006 172305-9093-08 Roberts, Jack W+ Linda R 19212—6it''Avenue SE, Snohomish, WA 172305-9094-07 98296 Kerb, Floyd........................... ......................................................._22225 SE 4 , Redmond, WA 98052 172305-9095-06 Almont, Garrett L 10113—416th Avenue SE, North Bend, WA 172305-9111-06 98045 Santa, Mick C 4905— 116th Avenue SE, Bellevue, WA 98006 172305-9155-03 Paccar Inc ATTN: Corporate Accounting 722300-0010-04 PO Box 1518, Bellevue, WA 98009 (Attach additional sheets, if necessary) (Continued) NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER Applicant Certification I, itiG,e,, /2S0A) , hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property (Print Name) owners and their addresses were obtained from: ❑ Title Company Records X King County Assessors Records Signed—l41, (-7-kilA(1F1/L.-- Date /—'"0(Appint) NOTARY ATTESTED: Subscribed�" and sworn before me, a NotaryPublic, in and fp .the State of Washington, residing at Se4. kf-LQ t WA on the day of J -fl 4C4h _ , 20 D Z,. Signed �!la' JL4 O 1 WENDY J. DUTHIE Notary Public) : NOTARY PUBLIC 3 unit yr vvman1Nu i UN ' COMMISSION CXrinc3 '"`**For City of Rentolr tJsi l 8I~ ✓� CERTIFICATION:OF MAILING hereby certify that notices of the proposed application:were mailed to (City Employee) each listed propertyowner on <,? Signed / ' Date: : NOTARY .. ATT ST S bscnbed and sworn before:me, a Notary Public,: n and for the;State of Washington residing It �� �� on theaS�. day•of � 1—. 20..11:,1. Sion ' ' c MARIL'Y ,4 C EF r . .... 4 fOTARY I UBLIC IREV oa MARILYN KAMCHEFF dioo STATE OF WASHINGTON MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES:6-29-03 COMMISSION EXPIRES 1 JUNE 29, 2003 CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the "> day of / /1?) I I , 2002, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing ;t. t -I-2 y tv\s vUL l©( documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing See 5-( (Signature of Sender) STATE OF WASHINGTON SS COUNTY OF KING I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that 4t d(a Dom_ BO_,LAu) signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: ,.Lf9JL-i_ :L:i c7()?)-- ,CREPE ► Notary Public i and for t a State of Washing o 1BLIC Notary(Print) MARILYN KAMCHEFF HINGTON My appointment expire my ApPflINTMFNT FXPIRFS:B-29-03 EXPIRES '003 Project Name: .. a KAMCHEFF Project Number: `J NOTARY FUBLIC LA O2-coo ) Gl.�-�N� EG,(= STATE OFWAStiINGTON 1 COMMISSION EXPIRES Q JUNE 29, 2003 NOTARY.DOC AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING (ERC DETERMINATIONS) Dept. o Ecology Larry Fisher Mr. Rod Malcom, Fisheries Environmental Review Section WA Dpt. Of Fish &Wildlife Muckleshoot Indian Tribe PO Bo)( 47703 C/o Dept. of Ecology 3901 5— 172nd Avenue SE Olympia, WA 98504-7703 3190— 160th Ave. SE Auburn, WA 98092 Bellevue, WA 98008 WSDO Northwest Region Duwamish Tribal Office Mr. David Dietzman King Aria Dev. Serv., MS-240 14235 Ambaum Blvd. SW — Front A Dept. of Natural Resources PO Bo) 330310 Burien, WA 98166 PO Box 47015 Seattle WA 98133-9710 Olympia, WA 98504-7015 US Army Corp. of Engineers Ms. Shirley Marroquin Eric Swennson Seattle District Office Environmental Planning Supervisor Seattle Public Utilities PO Bo) C-3755 KC Wastewater Treatment Division 710—2nd Avenue, 10th Floor Seattle WA 98124 201 South Jackson St, MS KSC-NR-050 Seattle, WA 98104 Attn: SI EPA Reviewer Seattle,WA 98104-3855 KC Del & Environmental Serv. City of Newcastle City of Kent Attn: SI=PA Section Attn: Mr. Micheal E. Nicholson Attn: Mr. Fred Satterstrom, AICP 900 Ockesdale Ave. SW Director of Community Development Acting Community Dev. Director Renton, WA 98055-1219 13020 SE 72nd Place 220 Fourth Avenue South Newcastle, WA 98059 Kent, WA 98032-5895 Gary Kriedt Joe Jainga Metro Environmental Planning PSE— Municipal Land Planner KSC-TR-0431 PO Box 90868 201 South Jackson Street Ms: XRD-01W Seattle, WA 98104 Bellevue, WA 98009-0868 l ast printed 11/19/01 11:34 AM 190-110E. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTE)TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: JOOS STORAGE BUILDING PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-02-006,CU-H,ECF The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit for he construction of a storage buildings located within the CA zoning designation. The building is proposed to have a footprint of 7,605 square feet with a mezzanine level of 2,509 square feet totaling 10,114 gro is square feet of building area. The structure is planned to be approximately 28 feet in height upon corm letion. The development includes street frontage improvements, on-site landscaping, and 3 internal pa king spaces. With the development of the storage building, the applicant would demolish an existing 1,:30 square foot single-family house and 360 square foot detached garage currently located on site. AccEss to the storage building would be provided from North Marion Street with additional alley access loc ated directly adjacent to the northern property boundary. Construction improvements are anticipatec to begin in the summer of 2002. Location: 1532 North Marion Street. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE q124°Z ENVIRONMEN r. iQL.J/. Appeals of the er vironmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM May 13,2002. Appeals must be filed in v'citing together with the required$75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grad!Way, Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8•110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Offic.,(425)430-6510. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the 7th floor of C ty Hall,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,Washington,on May 21,2002 at 9:00 AM to consider the • propsoed Condit onal Use Permit. If the Environmental Determination Is appealed, the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. i • / i . ) CA / D..oaM K.nw-rN T!`ak Plant. \ e Ito', b INi i1wW M. • .ti� .� / m C Mw • • 4'�:W .me •0 0 '' u.,7�\ v ,,c—��.. r.AIM el.I rel ti > aw, a C C .V+.l rr/ �q~❑t -`'COO LI �...Z ..L-.��.. y1B _"i--4tlGi1r1lf _ __./_ . owes ,i.gg Bire RA a M:._s.- T • g.p Br••k$ . A.,y p+ / a Nil. Of....W.,w� ,,; a: g_ Ae4 • • / 14:nd HI Ala, *icInIty Plan • — ,mow - . - .I..,....�,:.... FOR FURTF IER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT (425) 430-7219. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Plea ie include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. 1 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON,WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee has issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. JOOS STORAGE BUILDING LUA-02-006,CU-H,ECF Construction of a storage buildings located within the CA zoning designation. Location: 1532 North Marion Street. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM May 13, 2002. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner in the Council Chambers, City Hall, on May 21, 2002 at 9:00 AM to consider the Conditional Use Permit. If the Environmental Determination is appealed, the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. Interested parties are invited to attend the public hearing. Publication Date: April 29, 2002 Account No. 51067 dnsmpub.dot 4 ` CITY i RENTON Itp Planning/Building/PublicWorks Depaitisient Jesse Tann;r,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman RE.,Administrator April 23, 2002 Mr. NE al Thompson Roger H. Newell, AIA 1102-- 19th Avenue East Seattle), WA 98112 SUBJ ECT: Joos Storage Building Project No. LUA-02-006,CU-H,ECF Dear Mr.Thompson: This l ;tter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) and is to advise you that they t ave completed their review of the subject project. The ERC issued a threshold Determination of Non ignificance-Mitigated with Mitigation Measures. Please refer to the enclosed Mitigation Measures docur lent. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM May 13, 2002. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City cf Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City cf Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may t e obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor )f City Hall, on May 21, 2002 at 9:00 AM to consider the proposed Conditional Use Permit. The applic ant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff eport will be mailed to you one week before the hearing. If the Environmental Determination is appealed, the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. The F receding information will assist you in planning for implementation of your project and enable you to exerc se your appeal rights more fully, if you choose to do so. If you have any questions or desire clarifi ration of the above, please call me at (425) 430-7219. F e Environmental Review Committee, Jason E. ordan Asso;late Planner cc: Mr. Paul N. Joos/Owner Enck sure dnsmi otter RENTON 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 n AHEAD OF THE CURVE ..• 0 This paper contains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-02-006, CU-H, ECF APPLICANT: Neil Thompson/Roger H. Newell, AIA PROJECT NAME: JOOS STORAGE BUILDING DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit for the construction of a storage buildings located within the CA zoning designation. The building is proposed to have a footprint of 7,605 square feet with a mezzanine level of 2,509 square feet totaling 10,114 gross square feet of building area. The structure is planned to be approximately 28 feet in height upon completion. The development includes street frontage improvements, on-site landscaping, and 3 internal parking spaces. With the development of the storage building, the applicant would demolish an existing 1,230 square foot single-family house and 360 square foot detached garage currently located on site. Access to the storage building would be provided from North Marion Street with additional alley access located directly adjacent to the northern property boundary. Construction improvements are anticipated to begin in the summer of 2002. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL 1532 North Marion Street MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations contained within the Geotechnical Report prepared by Geotech Consultants, Inc. dated November, 2000 with regard to site preparation, grading, structural fill, foundations, and drainage. The satisfaction of this requirement shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of building and construction permits for the project. 2. The applicant shall install and maintain the temporary erosion control measures to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project: 3. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee based on a rate of $0.52 per square foot of new commercial building area and is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. 4. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Traffic Mitigation Fee based on a rate of $75.00 per new trip generated by the project prior to the issuance of building permits. mitmeasures CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLII;ATION NO(S): LUA-02-006, CU-H, ECF APPLI,',ANT: Neil Thompson/Roger H. Newell, AIA PROJE:CT NAME: JOOS STORAGE BUILDING DESC UIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and a Hearin 3 Examiner Conditional Use Permit for the construction of a storage buildings located within the CA zoning designation. The building is proposed to have a footprint of 7,605 square feet with a mezzanine level of 2,509 square feet totaling 10,114 gross square feet of building area. The structure is planned to be approximately 28 feet in height upon completion. The development includes street frontage impro\ements, on-site landscaping, and 3 internal parking spaces. With the development of the storage building, the applicant would demolish an existing 1,230 square foot single-family house and 360 square foot detached garage currently located on site. Access to the storage building would be provided from North Marion Street with additional alley access located directly adjacent to the northern property bound iry. Construction improvements are anticipated to begin in the summer of 2002. LOCA LION OF PROPOSAL: 1532 North Marion Street Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeza process for environmental determinations. Plannl stJP. 1. The site is designated Employment Area Commercial on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. 2. RMC section 4-4-030.C.2 limits haul hours between 8:30 am to 3:30 pm, Monday through Friday unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Division. The Development Services Division reserves the right to rescind the approved extended haul hours at any time if complaints are received. 3. Within thirty (30) days of completion of grading work, the applicant shall hydroseed or plant an appropriate ground cover over any portion of the site that is graded or cleared of vegetation and where no further construction work will occur within ninety (90) days. Alternative measures such as mulch, sodding, or plastic covering as specified in the current King County Surface Water Management Design Manual as adopted by the City of Renton may be proposed between the dates of November 1st and March 31st of each year. The Development Services Division's approval of this work is required prior to final inspection and approval of the permit. PropE rty Services—Information 1. Comments to come under separate cover. Fire F revention 1. The preliminary fire flow is 3000 GPM, one hydrant is required within 150 feet of the structure and two additional hydrants are required within 300 feet of the structure. Joos Storage Building LUA-02-006,CU-H,ECF Advisory Notes (continued) Page 2 of 3 Plan Review—Water 1. A Water System Development Charge of $1,562.33 is payable at time of issuance of utility construction permits. The rate is $ 0.154 x per square foot of gross site area (10,145 sq ft). A redevelopment credit will apply for existing water service connections. 2. Preliminary fire flow required is 3,000 gpm. A water main extension may be required to provide adequate fire flow for this site. A 12-inch water main extended from Houser Way N, west in N. Marion to the westerly property line may be required. This will provide 3,500 gpm. 3. Three hydrants are required to serve this site. One hydrant shall be within 150 feet and two additional hydrants within 300 feet. Existing hydrants to be counted as fire protection shall be retrofitted with Storz"quick disconnect"fittings if not already installed. 4. If a fire sprinkler system is required, a separate utility permit and separate plans will be required for the installation of the double detector check valve assembly. 5. The site is located in Aquifer Protection Zone 2 and may be subject to additional requirements per City code. Constructed secondary containment may be required if more than 20 gallons of regulated hazardous materials will be present at the new facility (RMC 4-3-050H2d(i)). Certain uses require operating permits (RMC 4-9-015). A fill source statement (RMC 4-4-060L4) is required if more than 100 cubic yards of fill material will be imported to the project site. Construction Activity Standards (RMC 4-4-03007) shall be followed if during construction, more than 20 gallons of hazardous materials will be stored on site or vehicles will be fueled on site. Surface Water Management Standards (RMC 4-6-030E2 and 3)--Biofilters, stormwater conveyance, and water quality ponds may require a groundwater protection liner. Impervious surfaces shall be provided for areas subject to vehicular use or storage of chemicals. Plan Review—Sanitary Sewer 1. A Sewer System Development Charge of $1,075.37 is payable at time of issuance of utility construction permits. The rate is $0.106 x per square foot of gross site area (10,145 sq ft). 2. If floor drains are required by the building department, an oil/water separator will be required and must be connected to the sewer system. 3. If finished floor elevation is below 25 feet, a backflow device will be required to be installed. Note on the plan if required. 4. Due to the shallow depth of the main in the alley, the applicant will be required to show that gravity service to the building can be provided. Plan Review—Storm Drainage 1. A Surface Water System Development Charge of $0.183 per square foot of new impervious surface area at the site will apply. The applicant shall provide information on existing and new impervious surface area. 2. An Erosion Control Plan is required and has not been provided. 3. A drainage narrative has been submitted and reviewed. The applicant has provided calculations indicating the site is exempt from detention. The applicant will need to address all Core Requirements and any Special Requirements as outlined in the 1990 KCSWM prior to the issuance of construction permits. mitmeasures Joos St rage Building LUA-02.006,CU-H,ECF Advisor/Notes (continued) Page 3 of 3 Plan RE view—General 1. Civil plans will be required for the water main extension and hydrants. Plans submitted shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. City of Renton title block shall be added to the standard 22 x 34 sheet size. Cover sheet shall include vicinity map, horizontal and vertical controls, legend, North arrow etc. All applicable City of Renton standard details and notes shall be included on the plans. All civil plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. When approval is granted and utility plans are complete, please submit permit application, three (3) copies of drawings, two (2) copies of the drainage report, and an itemized cost of construction estimate and application fee at the counter on the sixth floor.A fee worksheet is attached for your use, but prior to preparing a check, it is recommended to call 425-430-7266 for a fee estimate as generated by the permit system. The fee for review and inspection of these improvements is 5% of the first$100,000 of the estimated construction costs; 4%of anything over$100,000 but less than $200,000, and 3% of anything over$200,000. Half the fee must be paid upon application. 2. Separate permits for water meters, side sewer, irrigation meters and backflow device is required. Buildin 1. Demolition permits for the removal of the existing residence will be required. 2. Building permits are required for any retaining walls-in excess 4 feet in height. 4 1 > < „ mitme,tsures 01170 CITY ,_)F RENTON Planning/Building/PublicWorks Depai tinent Jesse Tani er,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator April 25, 20C 2 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section • PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Subject: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on April 23, 2002: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED JOO.; STORAGE BUILDING LUA-)2-006,CU-H,ECF The e pplicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit for the construction of a storage buildings located within the CA zoning designation. The building is proposed to have a footprint of 7,605 square feet with a mezzanine level of 2,509 square feet totaling 10,114 gross square feet o building area. The structure is planned to be approximately 28 feet in height upon completion. The devel pment includes street frontage improvements, on-site landscaping, and 3 internal parking spaces. With the d(velopment of the storage building, the applicant would demolish an existing 1,230 square foot single- family house and 360 square foot detached garage currently located on site. Access to the storage building would be provided from North Marion Street with additional alley access located directly adjacent to the north(rn property boundary. Construction improvements are anticipated to begin in the summer of 2002. Locati xi: 1532 North Marion Street. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM May 13, 2002. Appeals must be filed in writi ig together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, R )nton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8- 110.B. Additic ial information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. If you have questions, please call me at (425) 430-7219. For t nviror mental Review Committee, Jason E. JorerA Associate Plan ler cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division Larry Fisher, Department of Fisheries David F . Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources WSDO 1, Northwest Region Duwarr ish Tribal Office Rod f\&loom, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (Ordinance) US Arrr y Corp. of Engineers Enclosure AgencyLetter\ RENTON 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 AHEAD OF THE CURVE f.., This paper contains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-02-006, CU-H, ECF APPLICANT: Neil Thompson/Roger H. Newell, AIA PROJECT NAME: JOOS STORAGE BUILDING DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit for the construction of a storage buildings located within the CA zoning designation. The building is proposed to have a footprint of 7,605 square feet with a mezzanine level of 2,509 square feet totaling 10,114 gross square feet of building area. The structure is planned to be approximately 28 feet in height upon completion. The development includes street frontage improvements, on-site landscaping, and 3 internal parking spaces. With the development of the storage building, the applicant would demolish an existing 1,230 square foot single-family house and 360 square foot detached garage currently located on site. Access to the storage building would be provided from North Marion Street with additional ,.;alley access located directly adjacent to the northern property boundary. Construction improvements are anticipated to begin in the summer of 2002. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: if 1532 North Marion Street a , MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations contained within the Geotechnical Report prepared by Geotech Consultants, Inc. dated November, 2000 with regard to site preparation, grading, structural fill, foundations, and drainage. The satisfaction of this requirement shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of building and construction permits for the project. 2. The applicant shall install and maintain the temporary erosion control measures to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project: 3. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee based on a rate of $0.52 per square foot of new commercial building area and is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. 4. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Traffic Mitigation Fee based on a rate of $75.00 per new trip generated by the project prior to the issuance of building permits. measures • CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-02-006, CU-H, ECF APPLICANT: Neil Thompson/Roger H. Newell, AIA PROJECT NAME: JOOS STORAGE BUILDING DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit for the construction of a storage buildings located within the CA zoning designation. The building is proposed to have a footprint of 7,605 square feet with a mezzanine level of 2,509 square feet totaling 10,114 gross square feet of building area. The structure is planned to be approximately 28 feet in height upon completion. The development includes street frontage improvE ments, on-site landscaping, and 3 internal parking spaces. With the development of the storage building, the applicant would demolish an existing 1,230 square foot single-family house and 360 square foot detached garage currently located on site. Access to the storage building would be provided from North Marion Street with additional alley access located directly adjacent to the northern property boundary. Construction improvements are anticipated to begin in the summer of 2002. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL ` ,-1532 North Marion Street Advises y Notes to Applicant: 4 The fohowing notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determ,nation. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal,,rocess for environmental determinations. Planninc 1. The site is designated Employment Area Commercial on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. 2. RMC section 4-4-030.C.2 limits haul hours between 8:30 am to 3:30 pm, Monday through Friday unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Division. The Development Services Division reserves the right to rescind the approved extended haul hours at any time if complaints are received. 3. Within thirty (30) days of completion of grading work, the applicant shall hydroseed or plant an appropriate ground cover over any portion of the site that is graded or cleared of vegetation and where no further construction work will occur within ninety (90) days. Alternative measures such as mulch, sodding, or plastic covering as specified in the current King County Surface Water Management Design Manual as adopted by the City of Renton may be proposed between the dates of November 1st and March 31st of each year. The Development Services Division's approval of this work is required prior to final inspection and approval of the permit. Property Services— Information 1. Comments to come under separate cover. Fire Prev?ntion 1. 1 he preliminary fire flow is 3000 GPM, one hydrant is required within 150 feet of the structure and bvo additional hydrants are required within 300 feet of the structure. Joos Storage Building LUA-02-006,CU-H,ECF Advisory Notes (continued) Page 2 of 3 Plan Review—Water 1. A Water System Development Charge of $1,562.33 is payable at time of issuance of utility construction permits. The rate is $ 0.154 x per square foot of gross site area (10,145 sq ft). A redevelopment credit will apply for existing water service connections. 2. Preliminary fire flow required is 3,000 gpm. A water main extension may be required to provide adequate fire flow for this site. A 12-inch water main extended from Houser Way N, west in N. Marion to the westerly property line may be required. This will provide 3,500 gpm. 3. Three hydrants are required to serve this site. One hydrant shall be within 150 feet and two additional hydrants within 300 feet. Existing hydrants to be counted as fire protection shall be retrofitted with Storz "quick disconnect"fittings if not already installed. 4. If a fire sprinkler system is required, a separate utility permit and separate plans will be required for the installation of the double detector check valve assembly. 5. The site is located in Aquifer Protection Zone 2 and may be subject to additional requirements per City code. Constructed secondary containment may be required if more than 20 gallons of regulated hazardous materials will be present at the new facility (RMC 4-3-050H2d(i)). Certain uses require operating permits (RMC 4-9-015). A fill source statement (RMC 4-4-060L4) is required if more than 100 cubic yards of fill material will be imported to the project site. Construction Activity Standards (RMC 4-4-03007) shall be followed if during construction, more than 20 gallons of hazardous materials will be stored on site or vehicles will be fueled on site. Surface Water Management Standards (RMC 4-6-030E2 and 3)--Biofilters, stormwater conveyance, and water quality ponds may require a groundwater protection liner. Impervious surfaces shall be provided for areas subject to vehicular use or storage of chemicals. Plan Review—Sanitary Sewer - r ' ` W , 1. A Sewer System Development Charge of $1,075.37 is payable at time of issuance of utility construction permits. The rate is $ 0.106 x per square foot of gross site area (10,145 sq ft). 2. If floor drains are required by the building department, an oil/water separator will be required and must be connected to the sewer system. 3. If finished floor elevation is below 25 feet, a backflow device will be required to be installed. Note on the plan if required. 4. Due to the shallow depth of the main in the alley, the applicant will be required to show that gravity service to the building can be provided. Plan Review—Storm Drainage 1. A Surface Water System Development Charge of $0.183 per square foot of new impervious surface area at the site will apply. The applicant shall provide information on existing and new impervious surface area. 2. An Erosion Control Plan is required and has not been provided. 3. A drainage narrative has been submitted and reviewed. The applicant has provided calculations indicating the site is exempt from detention. The applicant will need to address all Core Requirements and any Special Requirements as outlined in the 1990 KCSWM prior to the issuance of construction permits. mitmeasures Joos Storage Building LUA-02-006,CU-H,ECF Advisory Notes (continued) Page 3 of 3 Plan Review—General 1. Civil plans will be required for the water main extension and hydrants. Plans submitted shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. City of Renton title block shall be added to the standard 22 x 34 sheet size. Cover sheet shall include vicinity map, horizontal and vertical controls, legend, North arrow etc. All applicable City of Renton standard details and notes shall be included on the plans. All civil plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. When approval is granted and utility plans are complete, please submit permit application, three (3) copies of drawings, two (2) copies of the drainage report, and an itemized cost of construction estimate and application fee at the counter on the sixth floor. A fee worksheet is attached for your use, but prior to preparing a check, it is recommended to call 425-430-7266 for a fee estimate as generated by the permit system. The fee for review and inspection of these improvements is 5% of the first$100,000 of the estimated construction costs; 4% of anything over$100,000 but less than $200,000, and 3% of anything over$200,000. Half the fee must be paid upon application. 2. Separate permits for water meters, side sewer, irrigation meters and backflow device is required. Buildinc i . A- 1. Demolition permits for the removal of the existing residence will be required. 2. Building permits are required for any retaining walls in excess 4 feet in height. „ .: aY' Y IY - „ u ' f ra'r5?cxeo'xxt 4 mitmeasures CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-02-006, CU-H, ECF APPLICANT: Neil Thompson/Roger H. Newell, AIA PROJECT NAME: JOOS STORAGE BUILDING DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit for the construction of a storage buildings located within the CA zoning designation. The building is proposed to have a footprint of 7,605 square feet with a mezzanine level of 2,509 square feet totaling 10,114 gross square feet of building area. The structure is planned to be approximately 28 feet in height upon completion. The development includes street frontage improvements, on- site landscaping, and 3 internal parking spaces. With the development of the storage building, the applicant would demolish an existing 1,230 square foot single-family house and 360 square foot detached garage currently located on site. Access to the storage building would be provided from North Marion Street with additional alley access located directly adjacent to the northern property boundary. Construction improvements are anticipated to begin in the summer of 2002. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 1532 North Marion Street LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM May 13,2002. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: April 29,2002 DATE OF DECISION: April 23,2002 SIGNATURES: 4 zr�/'1'i/ !. ' t zet,� DAT/��/ - re.: imm. .n, min o Department if 'la ingBuilding/Public Works .)VC-22_ r---x--itil .,),,,V Ji hepherd AAdmini rator DAT mm unity Servi Cy ---d - jel....—W--N _....--- . . V- V' e) / Lee e fir, Fire i DATE Re n ire Department dnsmsignature CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-02-006, CU-H, ECF APPLICANT: Neil Thompson/Roger H. Newell, AIA PROJECT NAME: JOOS STORAGE BUILDING DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit for the construction of a storage buildings located within the CA zoning designation. The building is proposed to have a footprint of 7,605 square feet with a mezzanine level of 2,509 square feet totaling 10,114 gross square feet of building area. The structure is planned to be approximately 28 feet in height upon completion. The development includes street frontage improvements, on- site landscaping, and 3 internal parking spaces. With the development of the storage building, the applicant would demolish an existing 1,230 square foot single-family house and 360 square foot detached garage currently located on site. Access to the storage building would be provided from North Marion Street with additional alley access located directly adjacent to the northern property boundary. Construction improvements are anticipated to begin in the summer of 2002. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 1532 North Marion Street LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM May 13, 2002. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: April 29, 2002 DATE OF DECISION: April 23, 2002 SIGNATURES: Veh /er-Z.,- re imm= -n, mini trator DAT Department .f 'la ing/Building/Public Works (/ /..u .)` eiTI�Jimihepherd, Admini rator DA Community Servi Lee er, Fire i DATE Re n ire Department dnsmsignature CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-02-006, CU-H, ECF APPLICANT: Neil Thompson/Roger H. Newell, AIA PROJECT NAME: JOOS STORAGE BUILDING DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit for the construction of a storage buildings located within the CA zoning designation. The building is proposed to have a footprint of 7,605 square feet with a mezzanine level of 2,509 square feet totaling 10,114 gross square feet of building area. The structure is planned to be approximately 28 feet in height upon completion. The development includes street frontage improvements, on-site landscaping, and 3 internal parking spaces. With the development of the storage building, the applicant would demolish an existing 1,230 square foot single-family house and 360 square foot detached garage currently located on site. Access to the storage building would be provided from North Marion Street with additional alley access located directly adjacent to the northern property boundary. Construction improvements are anticipated to begin in the summer of 2002. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 1532 North Marion Street MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations contained within the Geotechnical Report prepared by Geotech Consultants, Inc. dated November, 2000 with regard to site preparation, grading, structural fill, foundations, and drainage. The satisfaction of this requirement shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of building and construction permits for the project. 2. The applicant shall install and maintain the temporary erosion control measures to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project: 3. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee based on a rate of $0.52 per square foot of new commercial building area and is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. 4. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Traffic Mitigation Fee based on a rate of $75.00 per new trip generated by the project prior to the issuance of building permits. mitmeasures CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-02-006, CU-H, ECF APPLICANT: Neil Thompson/Roger H. Newell, AIA PROJECT NAME: JOOS STORAGE BUILDING DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit for the construction of a storage buildings located within the CA zoning designation. The building is proposed to have a footprint of 7,605 square feet with a mezzanine level of 2,509 square feet totaling 10,114 gross square feet of building area. The structure is planned to be approximately 28 feet in height upon completion. The development includes street frontage improvements, on-site landscaping, and 3 internal parking spaces. With the development of the storage building, the applicant would demolish an existing 1,230 square foot single-family house and 360 square foot detached garage currently located on site. Access to the storage building would be provided from North Marion Street with additional alley access located directly adjacent to the northern property boundary. Construction improvements are anticipated to begin in the summer of 2002. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 1532 North Marion Street Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Planning 1. The site is designated Employment Area Commercial on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. 2. RMC section 4-4-030.C.2 limits haul hours between 8:30 am to 3:30 pm, Monday through Friday unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Division. The Development Services Division reserves the right to rescind the approved extended haul hours at any time if complaints are received. 3. Within thirty (30) days of completion of grading work, the applicant shall hydroseed or plant an appropriate ground cover over any portion of the site that is graded or cleared of vegetation and where no further construction work will occur within ninety (90) days. Alternative measures such as mulch, sodding, or plastic covering as specified in the current King County Surface Water Management Design Manual as adopted by the City of Renton may be proposed between the dates of November 1st and March 31st of each year. The Development Services Division's approval of this work is required prior to final inspection and approval of the permit. Property Services— Information 1. Comments to come under separate cover. Fire Prevention 1. The preliminary fire flow is 3000 GPM, one hydrant is required within 150 feet of the structure and two additional hydrants are required within 300 feet of the structure. Joos Storage Building LUA-02-006,CU-H,ECF Advisory Notes (continued) Page 2 of 3 Plan Review—Water 1. A Water System Development Charge of $1,562.33 is payable at time of issuance of utility construction permits. The rate is $ 0.154 x per square foot of gross site area (10,145 sq ft). A redevelopment credit will apply for existing water service connections. 2. Preliminary fire flow required is 3,000 gpm. A water main extension may be required to provide adequate fire flow for this site. A 12-inch water main extended from Houser Way N, west in N. Marion to the westerly property line may be required.This will provide 3,500 gpm. 3. Three hydrants are required to serve this site. One hydrant shall be within 150 feet and two additional hydrants within 300 feet. Existing hydrants to be counted as fire protection shall be retrofitted with Storz"quick disconnect"fittings if not already installed. 4. If a fire sprinkler system is required, a separate utility permit and separate plans will be required for the installation of the double detector check valve assembly. 5. The site is located in Aquifer Protection Zone 2 and may be subject to additional requirements per City code. Constructed secondary containment may be required if more than 20 gallons of regulated hazardous materials will be present at the new facility (RMC 4-3-050H2d(i)). Certain uses require operating permits (RMC 4-9-015). A fill source statement (RMC 4-4-060L4) is required if more than 100 cubic yards of fill material will be imported to the project site. Construction Activity Standards (RMC 4-4-03007) shall be followed if during construction, more than 20 gallons of hazardous materials will be stored on site or vehicles will be fueled on site. Surface Water Management Standards (RMC 4-6-030E2 and 3)--Biofilters, stormwater conveyance, and water quality ponds may require a groundwater protection liner. Impervious surfaces shall be provided for areas subject to vehicular use or storage of chemicals. Plan Review—Sanitary Sewer 1. A Sewer System Development Charge of $1,075.37 is payable at time of issuance of utility construction permits. The rate is $0.106 x per square foot of gross site area (10,145 sq ft). 2. If floor drains are required by the building department, an oil/water separator will be required and must be connected to the sewer system. 3. If finished floor elevation is below 25 feet, a backflow device will be required to be installed. Note on the plan if required. 4. Due to the shallow depth of the main in the alley, the applicant will be required to show that gravity service to the building can be provided. Plan Review—Storm Drainage 1. A Surface Water System Development Charge of $0.183 per square foot of new impervious surface area at the site will apply. The applicant shall provide information on existing and new impervious surface area. 2. An Erosion Control Plan is required and has not been provided. 3. A drainage narrative has been submitted and reviewed. The applicant has provided calculations indicating the site is exempt from detention. The applicant will need to address all Core Requirements and any Special Requirements as outlined in the 1990 KCSWM prior to the issuance of construction permits. mitmeasures Joos Storage Building LUA-02-006,CU-H,ECF Advisory Notes (continued) Page 3 of 3 Plan Review—General 1. Civil plans will be required for the water main extension and hydrants. Plans submitted shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. City of Renton title block shall be added to the standard 22 x 34 sheet size. Cover sheet shall include vicinity map, horizontal and vertical controls, legend, North arrow etc. All applicable City of Renton standard details and notes shall be included on the plans. All civil plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. When approval is granted and utility plans are complete, please submit permit application, three (3) copies of drawings, two (2) copies of the drainage report, and an itemized cost of construction estimate and application fee at the counter on the sixth floor. A fee worksheet is attached for your use, but prior to preparing a check, it is recommended to call 425-430-7266 for a fee estimate as generated by the permit system. The fee for review and inspection of these improvements is 5% of the first$100,000 of the estimated construction costs; 4% of anything over$100,000 but less than $200,000, and 3%of anything over$200,000. Half the fee must be paid upon application. 2. Separate permits for water meters, side sewer, irrigation meters and backflow device is required. Building 1. Demolition permits for the removal of the existing residence will be required. 2. Building permits are required for any retaining walls in excess 4 feet in height. mitmeasures STAFF. City of Renton REPORT Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE A. ELL CKGROUND ERC MEETING DATE April 23, 2002 Project Nime: Joos Storage Building Applicant Neil Thompson Roger H. Newell, AIA 1102 19th Avenue East Seattle,WA 98112 (206) 322-1192 File Numt er: LUA-02-006, ECF, CU-H Project M,inager: Jason E. Jordan Project Dt,scription: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit for the construction of a storage buildings located within the CA zoning designation. The building is proposed to have a footprint of 7,605 square feet with a mezzanine level of 2,509 square feet totaling 10,114 gross square feet of building area. The structure is planned to be approximately 28 feet in height upon completion. The development includes street frontage improvements, on-site landscaping, and 3 internal parking spaces. With the development of the storage building, the applicant would demolish an existing 1,230 square foot single-family house and 360 square foot detached garage currently located on site. Access to the storage building would be provided from North Marion Street with additional alley access located directly adjacent to the northern property boundary. Construction improvements are anticipated to begin in the summer of 2002. Project Location: 1532 North Marion Street Exist. Bldg. Area gsf: 1,590 sf (house & detached garage Proposed New Bldg. Area: 10,114 sf to be demolished) Site Area: 10,145 square feet Total Building Area gsf: 10,114 sf RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Non-Significance—Mitigated(DNS-M). / / // i / P.ccu K.nworth Muck Pl.nl lie p .. w/r ..l or. d (j r. h, N 4IIA r w..+.. . CA t3 wr \ ❑o o llq t-fib d3SI . w . / .w u ly _/,: L. C'' (�rwnw..r. I �a a� ❑�a ¢[7 t. �� a w. I r v.a I' plifi E o NY •""— .r. o p o p. ❑A❑ 2 C UO w...«ar \ N]rd SI 4-Fl T. PPP IIgAPG/ C dK�/r4[iW,o 3 _ o trig, Be A 12 _ w f ❑ ❑ p/ a .ww.,r...wL" / 3 ,p G Brooks e w...l..... . /; q I.,. ....a n.w. i hlj! .-- / •2'I _ N 2nd St ag iii ila I CA CA e '��.wl O Project Loca ion Map 1 _I M a ERCRPT.doc -.N City of Renton P/B/PW Department Envirc ntal Review Committee Staff Report JOOS STORAGE BUILDING LUA-02-006, ECF, CU-H REPORT OF APRIL 23,2002 Page 2 of 5 B. RECOMMENDATION Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINATION OF DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE XX NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED. Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. XX Issue DNS-M with 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS with 15 day Comment Period Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period with Concurrent 14 day Appeal Period. with Concurrent 14 day Appeal Period. C. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS In compliance with RCW 43.21 C. 240, the following project environmental review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. 1. Earth Impacts: The subject site is considered to be generally flat and has less than a one percent slope. The site is developed with an existing house and detached garage, which are proposed to be demolished with this application. The yard areas are covered with grass lawn and other small to medium sized ornamental deciduous and conifer trees. The applicant has submitted a Geotechnical Investigation Report, prepared by Geotech Consultants, Inc. dated November, 2000, which states that the site is underlain by medium dense sand and silty sand overlying approximately 10 feet of relatively soft silt and loose fine-grained silty sand. Below this, the Geotechnical Engineer encountered 3 to 7 feet of moderately compressible peat overlying medium-dense to dense sand and silty sand. The report concludes that the site is compatible with the proposed development and makes recommendations with regard to site preparation, grading, structural fill, foundations, and drainage—all of which staff recommends the applicant be required to comply with in order to mitigate potential impacts to earth. Potential erosion impacts that could occur during project construction would be adequately mitigated by City Code requirements for approval of a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) pursuant to the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) and a Construction Mitigation Plan prior to issuance of Construction Permits. However, in order to ensure potential erosion impacts are adequately mitigated, staff recommends that temporary erosion control measures be maintained to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project. Mitigation Measures: • The applicant shall comply with the recommendations contained within the Geotechnical Report prepared by Geotech Consultants, Inc. dated November, 2000 with regard to site preparation, grading, structural fill, foundations, and drainage. The satisfaction of this requirement shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of building and construction permits for the project. • The applicant shall install and maintain the temporary erosion control measures to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project: Nexus: SEPA Environmental Regulations 2. Water Impacts: There are no surface water bodies nor wetlands located on the site or in the immediate vicinity of the site. Upon completion of the project, approximately 75% of the site would be covered with impervious surfaces. With the project application, a drainage narrative prepared by the project applicant dated December, 2001 was submitted. According to the drainage narrative, existing site drainage from the house and detached garage is accommodated through on-site infiltration. However, drainage from the proposed storage building would be collected by gutters and downspouts and tight lined to a catch basin in the driveway. The footing drains would also be directed into the proposed catch basin. The stormwater runoff, would be tighlined to an existing storm line in the south half of North Marion Street. All interior surfaces subject to vehicular traffic would be serviced by floor drains connected to an oil/water separator and then conveyed to the sanitary sewer. All impervious surfaces subject to vehicular traffic are expected to be limited to 5,000 square feet or less. ERCRPT.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Envirc ntal Review Committee Staff Report JOOS STORAGE BUILDING LUA-02-006, ECF, CU-H REPORT OF APRIL 23,2002 Page 3 of 5 Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation is recommended Nexus: N/A 3. Fire Prevention Impacts: Fire Prevention staff indicate that sufficient resources exist to furnish services to the proposed development project provided the applicant completes required improvements and makes payment of necessary fees. The proposal would include the construction of a new 10,114 square foot storage building that would potentially impact the City's Fire Department. Therefore, staff recommends a Fire Mitigation Fee estimated at $5,259.28 (10,114 commercial square feet x $0.52 = $5,259.28) be required for the proposal. The payment of the fee would be required prior to the issuance of building permits. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee based on a rate of $0.52 per square foot of new commercial building area and is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. Policy Nexus: SEPA Environmental Regulations; Fire Mitigation Fee Resolution No. 2913, Ordinance 4527. 4. Transportation Impacts: Vehicular access to the subject site is proposed at two locations — one on the south side of the site (North Marion Street) and one on the north side of the site along a 16-foot wide alley. Primary vehicular access is proposed from the 16-foot pubic alley located behind the storage building. Three interior parking stalls would be provided at the entrance of the building directly adjacent to the public alley. As the proposal would result in an increase in traffic trips to the City's street system, staff recommends a Traffic Mitigation Fee be imposed on the project, with credit given for the existing single family residence. The Traffic Mitigation Fee is based on a rate of $75.00 per new average daily trip generated by the project. For the proposal, the fee is estimated at $1,179.00 ($75.00 x 15.72 new trips = $1,179.00). The fee is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. Mitigation Measures: • The applicant shall pay the appropriate Traffic Mitigation Fee based on a rate of $75.00 per net new average trip generated by the project prior to the issuance of building permits. Policy Nexus: SEPA Environmental Regulations; Transportation Mitigation Fee Resolution No. 3100, Ordinance 4527. D. MITIGATION MEASURES 1. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations contained within the Geotechnical Report prepared by Geotech Consultants, Inc. dated November, 2000 with regard to site preparation, grading, structural fill, foundations, and drainage. The satisfaction of this requirement shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of building and construction permits for the project. 2. The applicant shall install and maintain the temporary erosion control measures to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project: 3. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee based on a rate of $0.52 per square foot of new commercial building area and is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. 4. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Traffic Mitigation Fee based on a rate of $75.00 per new trip generated by the project prior to the issuance of building permits. E. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS The proposal has been circulated to City Departmental / Divisional Reviewers for their review. Where applicable, these comments have been incorporated into the text of this report as Mitigation Measures and/or Notes to Applicant. X _ Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. Environmental Determination Appeal Process Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM May 13, 2002. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the ERCRPT.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Envirc ntal Review Committee Staff Report JOOS STORAGE BUILDING LUA-02-006,ECF, CU-H REPORT OF APRIL 23,2002 Page 4 of 5 Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Planning 1. The site is designated Employment Area Commercial on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. 2. RMC section 4-4-030.C.2 limits haul hours between 8:30 am to 3:30 pm, Monday through Friday unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Division. The Development Services Division reserves the right to rescind the approved extended haul hours at any time if complaints are received. 3. Within thirty (30) days of completion of grading work, the applicant shall hydroseed or plant an appropriate ground cover over any portion of the site that is graded or cleared of vegetation and where no further construction work will occur within ninety (90) days. Alternative measures such as mulch, sodding, or plastic covering as specified in the current King County Surface Water Management Design Manual as adopted by the City of Renton may be proposed between the dates of November 1st and March 31st of each year. The Development Services Division's approval of this work is required prior to final inspection and approval of the permit. Property Services— Information 1. Comments to come under separate cover. Fire Prevention 1. The preliminary fire flow is 3000 GPM, one hydrant is required within 150 feet of the structure and two additional hydrants are required within 300 feet of the structure. Plan Review—Water 1. A Water System Development Charge of $1,562.33 is payable at time of issuance of utility construction permits. The rate is $ 0.154 x per square foot of gross site area (10,145 sq ft). A redevelopment credit will apply for existing water service connections. 2. Preliminary fire flow required is 3,000 gpm. A water main extension may be required to provide adequate fire flow for this site. A 12-inch water main extended from Houser Way N, west in N. Marion to the westerly property line may be required. This will provide 3,500 gpm. 3. Three hydrants are required to serve this site. One hydrant shall be within 150 feet and two additional hydrants within 300 feet. Existing hydrants to be counted as fire protection shall be retrofitted with Storz"quick disconnect" fittings if not already installed. 4. If a fire sprinkler system is required, a separate utility permit and separate plans will be required for the installation of the double detector check valve assembly. 5. The site is located in Aquifer Protection Zone 2 and may be subject to additional requirements per City code. Constructed secondary containment may be required if more than 20 gallons of regulated hazardous materials will be present at the new facility (RMC 4-3-050H2d(i)). Certain uses require operating permits (RMC 4-9-015). A fill source statement (RMC 4-4-060L4) is required if more than 100 cubic yards of fill material will be imported to the project site. Construction Activity Standards (RMC 4-4-03007) shall be followed if during construction, more than 20 gallons of hazardous materials will be stored on site or vehicles will be fueled on site. Surface Water Management Standards (RMC 4-6-030E2 and 3)--Biofilters, stormwater conveyance, and water quality ponds may require a groundwater protection liner. Impervious surfaces shall be provided for areas subject to vehicular use or storage of chemicals. Plan Review—Sanitary Sewer 1. A Sewer System Development Charge of $1,075.37 is payable at time of issuance of utility construction permits. The rate is $ 0.106 x per square foot of gross site area (10,145 sq ft). 2. If floor drains are required by the building department, an oil/water separator will be required and must be connected to the sewer system. 3. If finished floor elevation is below 25 feet, a backflow device will be required to be installed. Note on the plan if required. 4. Due to the shallow depth of the main in the alley, the applicant will be required to show that gravity service to the building can be provided. Plan Review—Storm Drainage 1. A Surface Water System Development Charge of $0.183 per square foot of new impervious surface area at the site will apply. The applicant shall provide information on existing and new impervious surface area. 2. An Erosion Control Plan is required and has not been provided. 3. A drainage narrative has been submitted and reviewed. The applicant has provided calculations indicating the site is exempt from detention. The applicant will need to address all Core Requirements and any Special ERCRPT.doc City of Rene on P/B/PW Department Enviro ital Review Committee Staff Report JOOS STORAGE BUILDING LUA-02-006, ECF, CU-H REPORT OF APRIL 23,2002 Page 5 of 5 Requirements as outlined in the 1990 KCSWM prior to the issuance of construction permits. Plan ReviE w—General 1. Civil p ans will be required for the water main extension and hydrants. Plans submitted shall conform to the Renton Draftir g Standards. City of Renton title block shall be added to the standard 22 x 34 sheet size. Cover sheet shall include vicinity map, horizontal and vertical controls, legend, North arrow etc. All applicable City of Renton standard details and notes shall be included on the plans. All civil plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. When approval is granted and utility plans are complete, please submit permit application, three (3) copies of drawings, two (2) copies of the drainage report, and an itemized cost of construction estimate and application fee at the counter on the sixth floor. A fee worksheet is attached for your use, but prior to preparing a check, it is recommended to call 425-430-7266 for a fee estimate as generated by the permit system. The fee for review and inspection of these improvements is 5% of the first$100,000 of the estimated construction costs; 4% of anything over$100,000 but less than $200,000, and 3% of anything over$200,000. Half the fee must be paid upon Epplication. 2. Separate permits for water meters, side sewer, irrigation meters and backflow device is required. Building 1. Demolition permits for the removal of the existing residence will be required. 2. Buildirg permits are required for any retaining walls in excess 4 feet in height. ERCRPT.doc / i I I • • i. : /P. / / CA rr44 .r \ . sets. / / Pence,KMw.rt11 Truck Pleatfin tt\\_ ss.n�' it? 1 v.ls :. en.. r I�. / r w / p -1-. % N 41k SI ..a^ter f..r...P..........A CA '•.\�..w. VIM rlrnue / U O O C {-Cb d7 N ..Ara V I� &. CA (i-r.rlw.r a°.n. wro' g6tf ir e 1 % G dM CA 1Y� E roux ..).•.n.a>.... P a C Q �/ � e/ c..wes y N Peer• -l. '� l�....s,�,/A1I • :///� /' 1a p ... OnO a —wnw wv.w..e '.✓t G ° a �S t.wa.i•n..u•` � mow.Jw...';,,.r p ° ° pA,e CN!: • \ ....r. i. It •4.Z r• r M.WS... ^ �l{°]1� C a �'•ICI O°❑ Q w ....at(KO s..ssrs / r ' Irv.•1.1.p sw s...s. _ / {-F1 .•.>--t 1]°°^8 D P O� ill l ai.i•'---,I --SAY r:.. --- '....mob KO 4 r.... _ — / ' / • ° a p - .+r / Y _� vny. • N �.s ( / 3 ' • d a ° t7 ee ^e..r.+. """'/ "' !� se a ..mow C Brooke Q Merl woe ..aan.1y y.... :—..y i 1._. ! N.Marion St.--- rt -- ti•,= `4 r... .v. r rna../�r') —,„, /} ( q O mow./wu/ l / Nine St T g a c;iJL: T7 ;. ./ CA �1°""°iei • p iws ) /j_ Hydrant Requirement . •' Proposed lmpsnous Surface n'"•""'a i0f'001M'"""° /1Vieinit Plan Nww •a+a •an 1i1..1.1)rb.'... .maw. / MI 14..1 I'•aro� n.ww.•..r...w w '.. __. -.mot•. __un Conmuolon Sequence ;• see. /t/' ° •...a r...r ron.^a,am iv.......a Imps wus'Surface Subject to ..M•w•yn,....Yw/�h....er...um. . / la-A MY.-..wr rr^r/.4....• .... Van.c Tralkc H r m:r+. ..a,..w / / 1M. :....{C..1. 1» Ca..�ie we ma / . .s.easr-a...,y or.en / / \ ..mows sm.euv.s..K.. / raa.\ �/ / WAIF H...c.0 a /11W.1 less R.MU.. • • \„,__._._ .. .4 •'a _.._- ..eye r o a!ID AIL Utility/ Drainage PI e -- I "...1.. I!,'. j: „.`.s )".ta.e ./. 1—s r _ -s 7MYr'1.5a r..p. 7- . --i PA(.•�wa Fd.c _— J.n..w)..f . .._� ..e4. mar....• • s.n..n.R,.s w•e.rs..M eF r.••.rr °•eres..,1 44 I .1e ea.w.1.w awr.el WM,ae survarial ..,sc*mow 1I C e.u.(a,.rns arcs. I. �� /' .mow e....now aa..ma airs wwrw.er Carkimp1101n MM..Pt p,w...1 1, 1.4•...aura Me.Wr al.p so .ar"ra• 11.. r / i eTemp.Construction Approach Silt Fence Detail 4 1 1.1 the a/Of 1 • 'Project Data Alley a M. C i o. aw.i�°� 1 � J - • mm::I•u • A • I ear w w *ION MOO PO C14 .01 11.41 war.. rar 4ti i�rM ror a Zoning Code Y 77-•q ' ;� i }� �ww..A,1J.1U1 _ ., IM,w• ..1xu•..., wI.. Molt 1 .w�.u•• w.I..Na. • r DO..... • _ II* air e ■ —_, fa ��o --= •I.I `• Na rerwr,E s+olwe a.,wl•.•mo ul1,,no vI.R 5 •...u. .,e !t tl{ ••w...b 1100.• %1,•o' R l4. M.. - µ.aW •MCL.LL. 51.0 Lacs Kw F A•1•• NO 1 paw 4. Iee, I. `` 'pow WI. • I iBuilding Data ��i -- r•▪•Ic.wa.•° r-II•.. I I 7- LL;OS.* rt 11 "" Z. it 1 w- >..nr w !!.a.w• MG • aa. IOW MM 1M .aim spasm �t , C .0 .w •. I T • Legal Description I _ I S --F_�=- • I Aces...N M.r•I.waits.M.ns 0 I Wr!II waw• I - Pen N.••l..•.C..V.WM.I.I r • �1 ii 101M0 • /- Index to Drawings l� I . �^ ^�R� .. .• • T R�.. _ I d • —ram Key •"�' ii* .•P • I - Yam• •9L •awn wrw•.w I w.Rm.•to ac. - • . 1 ti.,I..+lw al✓. n>s.v.e;.iw I !�a••wr v..luurad r, 41� FJI 711bn•IROM*. M*a' en.*b _,. - \ YY'.� y i �� ��-.•i ce js•.w. ! � w IYLIOµ C{K• 1� s a — y'f ! I II✓.+d aral. aa'.a•c.u•l rs SI 4� N 1 1 r l N.Marion Street - s •• 1134 Site Plan /Landscaping Plan 1 I rras tierr.• Alley } . N S•" -r- , — . iIb+� VI'.le I - I t o.s¢�N,"�v_°tea,,•.. +o' I --_....„,1-1---I ECHIti tz:,‘:` ,.,.-•--..----:::: ] . �e• • Si 1 r....rn.If _ • • I 1 • i III _ i • I rw,•w -l.rwwel.r. I I4•.i...a.. Mv....a 1 • F . , YI K,•p• ir.�+wai. •�f1 / 1•IY•.K. 1� ��i 1 }yi '� i �i • f tt i , It II'' ( y(p • •--f..Yrr• y..•.a '' I f _- W I i! �4i • pelts W a s a50,0 w �, ----_� NMrn•+.•- lugs.. • • lI / :I • r 1 .. /', • \ • 1 .,.a.rr Y.,.n, I 1 I 1 id•+•r f.rr w •e ==r-4.__:- 7-7. -f-; i i o.l --. _ .ram. �. • IL a +.a..."I` . 411‘'Q y.1y..wK - it 111 • t f --- ""•f l' - -F • 1 I o..1.•r. M'•• • >, f ♦ MY•. 1__ am.� , — - . ♦w•rw.rr1 • :II \ 1 i . . -. II 1 II � ; • � � III 1 .ii 1.114. ;•" N-• 4 . i -r-4- ___ _N_Marion Street __ Ai,k Mezzanine Plan \firstFloor Plan •2 gip ' » • • 1 I 1 _ ..._ .... . .. . • . /41.0,••,le,II/ 4,vrlyee Pai• 31 AI '•. • 4 L '' r —ii ••• 4--W.41" • • — _ — lit 1,i AV-141•. ---0. ••• 1 I .4.. -.-. . , ...... --- - ---- -. ' ... .41 It••••10'.fa ) IL. . . -- ,_..... . --- --r 1 4.. 1-iv i• • ir• ,, '1.,---,.. /- _-_-_y-In , ","4•.1 .. ...., ..."....ii ____ ,._ __•••!_-,-. • , '.. . 1 ' i IMO CUM i 0 I. .4,,,,,.. ... --,--- • F__... Iii 1, i1 . , • J._=_ - LI. I __l_Popr 1 lb 1,•.• ....v.. 4 _, _ t 4 -a 01-4,e- I /I mgaa.vat...4' , t ,•••••••••••• il id ‘I•••••00.01 OW* eff....1.•••• • ' 1 I I I I• West Elevation South ( Marion St.1 Elevation is...•.4,...-co — I I I ' I 1 1 F • -, I , 41•1•••• II . . --..- • .-----1— ,.._1 1 ,i M.N.11.0.1.0.••-.) . i . . . I ;V. , ...t I . III• -..-4- ^- ". +-I.,... i :..._.; . .__ ..y.; , o.... L. , ••• ill t tafti-••••Ma--? ... •1 .--.;-2 1 : : g..-. .i--... • : • ' ' '' -- :-4 F.- 9.••••• -1' ._ 1. 1 . k•Ill-- • 1 ,. . •• . \ ' •0111•11.4.40•IL mom ol .•••••••,.,..1 ea.* __-.....71.:.......:;!!..,........a.../.....1 2 ...0 own.. ow temer.grmi 4— -.We.ItuAt ' .. IIIIMill,131inill IN *NtM,Elevation East Elevation X...,..4 .4.'s 1 Lo.•a• a I • ' 1111111101M I 1 I 1 111111114&Willi __,.c.: ! -r Ot.....,......1.0, \`1.0 3 1 • ...RV. ...I I 2unrsno• ScAre.4 TA.,.. x.o...g. Ve. i.o" E4 • 8 T23N R5E E 1/- 1 WIT NNin• ‘ ',><R-8 Ferndale -8 R '-'-' NI CA J1Qi CA oD \. R-8 R ffi x R-8\ 7 . CA ce R-8 RM—I V, F I R-8 / C U I14�I/:CA Ord \" ck CA C. P-1 C ► Zr" RM—I cl— /////// - 4100 R—8� ��e. v c.) co 0, 00 7 1 CA R-8 cri o eq / I R a' Z CUR(P) R-8 W 6 M \'..4 o R-8 R-8) 1.4 CDR CY- i C / N �. � f0 RC eq/‘L" RC y 2C CUR co RC(P) cle N____I R_g RCci' °° O ce ir.rile R—8 8th �n-rOr D—Q G4 - 20 T23N R5E E 1/2 1CY ? � 4po F4 ��� ZONING =:4800 4 � � TECHNICAL 9SRVICE9 �FN,,o$ �� 17 T23N R5E E 1/2 Z( SING MAP BOO • 92 , ;3 9 455' d 45.6t x q l 459 61 x w-F • c 11.l1 +� i (� , , F B 2@ T24N R4E 25 T24N • 4N 5E- :` • 8" aro' 4 e >u 1N 27T24N R$Esr 26 T24N E • 94W \ C ,.... , - c 2 ‘ , 3 ._,...„.„414,-, i::,,,- ,,,,,,, c 6 C7 I II' 36 T24N R4E 3-4 T2:4N R5E, .,,....„,:,,,,, .....,.,, •-��Ft�-7r_' '',,,...__ i,„11.,.., ua� - 351124N R5E 306 307 —wr,,,,308` ,s '� ' D 1 1 ,,‘„, .. imk, Da,„„:„ „:,:\ ,,,.., 4,,, ,,,,., „,,,,,, ..., _ _ =.(4,-D , ,,,,, _,,..„ , w - \ ay , irl -Any, ..,_ ,,,:-,-,, , x ,-, 2 T23N R4E '1 23NR4� (...�gr �� -. ' ft5E .T23N R5E 1 4 ' J '3, 341 R5 ': •_',1-..,-:_'-:ir,,,,tj,-';,.,_._,,A.A 2 T23N R5E 316 ,1 31 ar 3'i : 3 9, 1u cr 3ji liril , , ' ate , •JT �• .� i +�"' ;- 806. i'I , . , ' t, Q 1 I t ` ' Ai—. 1 1,i- 11 11 T N R4E 12 T23N R4E • q' i'' � + . / T23N R5E Ik "� -� ( 10,12M ._, 12264 R5E ' 32 'y 326 • 'J '1 r. I 8 F1IoriNt it 6— Al I b 0 F re 1 4 T23N;R4E ;1 .-123N R4E 18'123N, l j','�'�jj': c ' 1 �' £� —, • �. 18 T23N 1.T23N'.R5E ,4 T23N R5E 334 c ti,335 ,\� ; J' 33 f , , ` _. 371 . 815-k 816 G1 • • 3 723N R4E 24 T23 R 1 i�'. , �� i' �y�' 4t� �-- ��` GT..: n 19 T23N <Z(FT23N R'i.. Y23� i . 22 T23N R5E 23 723N R5E 1 i44 4 600 A' ,`` 1 N-. 602 820 GGS• • •�• ._ _. 821 i 2P �11 H1H3 , H5 _H6HT 61T23NR4E 2T23111R4E ,- -30T23NR5E ti ff f'1 29 t N R5E 27 T'13N RSE 26 T21`R 1�9 0 i51� �' 603 -eb4 d'i'� 825 826 -• --J AEI ik-- . .-- n _��`_ ii 17 _ I12 . ,�� _��1 .1�% I ,J . , . _lii�l1 Nsum 36-1,3N R4E 41 T234 R5E 3 � a.,3N- ' 2T23N 35 T23N \ 56 ''a ,_ 6C17 608 ' , ,, 60 F':jl 11. • ',9; cr,,° +'�` 833 11 J2 O 88 f.-i. 22N R4E 1-T22N R4E ` 6 T22N R5E ; i 65'422N'R5E E \. 3 +'1 - 'hk• �11 II 7 _. ; 2 T22N R5E 1, NROLL RC Resource Conservation I CC I Convenience Commercial (v) Publicly Owned R-I Residential 1 du/ac I CN 1 Center Neighborhood* PAG E# Renton City Limits R-5 Residential 5 du/ac I CS I Center Suburban* — Adjacent City Limits SECT/TOWN/RANGE R-9 Residential B du/ac I] Center Downtown* I .. I (Grey Text) Prezones RUN Residential Manufactured Homes ICOR I Center Office Residential I•:•:•:I Automall District A R-IG Residential 10 du/ac CA Commercial Arterial a���� AutomaH District B a_ R-I4 Residential 14 du/ac 1---1Commercial Office • For additional regulations in overlay districts RU-I Residential Multi—Family Infill I IH I Industrial — Heavynot shown on this map, please see RMC 4-3. RU-N Residential Multi—Family Neighborhood Center I--1 Industrial — Medium PAGE 1 I—I Residential Multi—Family Suburban Center I—I Industrial — Light INDEX i RU-U Residential Multi—Family Urban Center. I P-1 I Public Use t City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Wu, ENVIRC NMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DE'ARTMENT:7(a�`�� - � COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 4, 2002 APPLICATION ND: LUA02-006, CU-H, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 28,2002 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES APPLICANT: NE it Thompson PROJECT MANAGER: Jason Jordan CITY OF RENTON PROJECT TITLE: Joos Storage Building WORK ORDER NO: 78936 MAR 2 9 2002 LOCATION: 151:2 N. Marion Street SITE AREA: 10,145 sf BUILDING AREA(gross): 10,114 sf 'ECEI`'ED SUMMARY OF F ROPOSAL:The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit for the construction of a self-storage buildings located within the CA zoning designation. The building is proposed to have a footprint of 7,605 square feet with a mezzanine level totaling 10,114 gross:quare feet of building area. The project is planned to be approximately 28 feet in height upon completion. The development includes street frontage improvements, on-site landscaping, and 3 internal parking spaces. With the development of the self-storage building, the applicant would demolish the existing single-family i esidence. A. ENVIRONI IENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Hea th Public Services Energy/ Historic./Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-1"ELATED COMMENTS 4 7 76(.._ C. CODE-RI'LATED COMMENTS .2.e? (4,-/VIrr—e/Z-e",-e We have review td this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where adciti al information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of ' ctor or uthorized Representative Date Routing Rev.10/93 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRC,NMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: I L �Ip, \ Qe J� � � COMMENTS DUE: APRIL$ 2002 APPLICATION NO: LUA02-006, CU-H, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 28,2002 AFVELOPMENT SERVICES APPLICANT: NE it Thompson PROJECT MANAGER: Jason Jordan CITY OF RENTON PROJECT TITLE: Joos Storage Building WORK ORDER NO: 78936 MAR 2 2002 LOCATION: 1532 N. Marion Street SITE AREA: 10,145 sf I BUILDING AREA(gross): 10,114 sf RECEIVED SUMMARY OF F ROPOSAL:The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit for the construction of a self-storage buildings located within the CA zoning designation. The building is proposed to have a footprint of 7,605 square feet with a mezzanine level totaling 10,114 gross:quare feet of building area. The project is planned to be approximately 28 feet in height upon completion. 1 he development includes street frontage improvements, on-site landscaping, and 3 internal parking spaces. With the development of the self-storage building, the applicant would demolish the existing single-family i esidence. A. ENVIRONIIENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Hea th Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-f°ELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RI'LATED COMMENTS •/7 ive*- We have review)d this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where adcitional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. -"/7/V02_, na Si ture of Di r or Authorized Representative Date Si gnature Routing Rev.10/93 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DE'ARTMENT• t�R pr.-C�p aN COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 4, 2002 APPLICATION NO: LUA02-006, CU-H, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MARCV 28;2002 r n - , APPLICANT: Nil Thompson PROJECT MANAGER: Jason Ix an I , PROJECT TITLE : Joos Storage Building WORK ORDER NO: 78936 LOCATION: 1532 N. Marion Street MAR 2 8 2002 SITE AREA: 10 145 sf BUILDING AREA(gross): 10,114 sf 1 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL:The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit for the construction of a self-storage buildings located within the CA zoning designation. The building is proposed to have a footprint of 7,605 square feet with a mezzanine level totaling 10,114 gross square feet of building area. The project is planned to be approximately 28 feet in height upon completion. The development includes street frontage improvements, on-site landscaping, and 3 internal parking space s. With the development of the self-storage building, the applicant would demolish the existing single-family Residence. A. ENVIRON,MENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Us,, Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Hes'th Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet ILI/4" B. POLICY-I iELATED COMMENTS 4)/1— C. CODE-R cLATED COMMENTS a It_ QC �TZdYtl uI We have revieti ed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where a ditional informati needed to properly assess this proposal. -..--S""/,;? 6:2_____ Signature of irector or Authorized R resentative Date Routing Rev.10/93 I � O CITY OF RENTON FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU - N� MEMORANDUM DATE: March 29, 2002 TO: Jason Jordan, Planner FROM: Jim Gray, Assistant Fire Marshal ``k SUBJECT: Soo's Storage Bldg., 1532 N. Mari. MITIGATION ITEMS; 1. A fire mitigation fee of $5,259.28 is required based on $.52 per square foot of the building square footage. FIRE CODE REQUIREMENTS: 1. The preliminary fire flow is 3000 GPM, one hydrant is required within 150 feet of the structure and two additional hydrants are required within 300 feet of the structure. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: April 12, 2002 TO: Jason Jordan FROM: Jan Illian X7216 SUBJECT: JOOS STORAGE BUILDING LUA 02-006 1532 — N. Marion Street I have r3viewed the application for the Joos Storage Building located at 1532 — N. Marion and have th 3 following comments: EXISTING CONDITIONS WATER There is a 6-inch main in N. Marion Street, and a 12-inch water main in Houser Way. Fire flow available (derated) at the site in Marion is 1,400 gpm. Static Pressure is 70 psi. Pressure Zone is 196. The site is located within Aquifer Protection Zone 2. SEWER There is an 8-inch sewer main in the alley along the north property line. STORM There is storm facilities in N. Marion STREE TS There is curb, gutter, sidewalk and streetlights fronting the property in N. Marion. CODE REQUIREMENTS WATER 1. A Nater System Development Charge of$1,562.33 is payable at time of issuance of utility ccnstruction permit. The rate is $ 0.154 x per square foot of gross site area (10,145 sq ft). A redevelopment credit will apply for existing water service connections. 2. Pieliminary fire flow required is 3,000 gpm. A water main extension is required to provide adequate fire flow for this site. A 12-inch water main extended from Houser, west in N. Marion to the westerly property line will be required. This will provide 3,500 gpm. 3. Three hydrants are required to serve this site. One hydrant is shall be within 150 feet and two additional within 300 feet. Existing hydrants to be counted as fire protection shall be retrofitted w th Storz "quick disconnect" fittings if not already installed. 4. If a fire sprinkler system is required, a separate utility permit and separate plans will be required for the installation of the double detector check valve assembly. 5. The site is located in Aquifer Protection Zone 2 and may be subject to additional requirements per City code. Constructed secondary containment may be required if more than 20 gallons of regulated hazardous materials will be present at the new facility (RMC 4-3-050H2d(i)). Certain uses require operating permits (RMC 4-9-015). A fill source statement (RMC 4-4- 060L4) is required if more than 100 cubic yards of fill material will be imported to the project site. Construction Activity Standards (RMC 4-4-03007) shall be followed if during construction, more than 20 gallons of hazardous materials will be stored on site or vehicles will be fueled on site. Surface Water Management Standards (RMC 4-6-030E2 and 3)-- Biofilters, stormwater conveyance, and water quality ponds may require a groundwater protection liner. Impervious surfaces shall be provided for areas subject to vehicular use or storage of chemicals. SANITARY SEWER 1. A Sewer System Development Charge of$1,075.37 is payable at time of issuance of utility construction permit. The rate is $ 0.106 x per square foot of gross site area (10,145 sq ft). 2. If fl por drains are required by the building department, an oil/water separator will be required anc must be connected to the sewer system. 3. If finished floor elevation is below 25 feet, a backflow device will be required to be installed. No..e on the plan if required. 4. Due to the shallow depth of the main in the alley, applicant will be required to show that gravity service to the building can be provided. SURFACE WATER 1. A ;>urface Water System Development Charge of $0.183 per square foot of new impervious surface area at the site will apply. Applicant shall provide information on existing and new impervious surface area. 2. An Erosion Control Plan is required. It has not been provided. 3. A drainage narrative has been submitted and reviewed. Applicant has provided calculations indicating the site is exempt from detention. Applicant will need to address all Core Requirements and any Special Requirements as outlined in the 1990 KCSWM. TRAN:;PORTATION 1. Tre traffic mitigation fees will be assessed at $1,179.00. See attached Mitigation Fee Report Tr is is payable at time of building permit PLAN REVIEW— GENERAL 1. CiN it plans will be required for the water main extension and hydrants. Plans submitted shall co iform to the Renton Drafting Standards. City of Renton title block shall be added to the st ndard 22 x 34 sheet size. Cover sheet shall include vicinity map, horizontal and vertical co itrols, legend, North arrow etc. All applicable City of Renton standard details and notes shall be included on the plans. All civil plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards, which are attached for reference. Wien approval is granted and utility plans are complete, please submit permit application, three (3) copies of drawings, two (2) copies of the drainage report, and an itemized cost of construction estimate and application fee at the counter on the sixth floor. A fee worksheet is attached for your use, but prior to preparing a check, it is recommended to call 425-430-7266 for a fee estimate as generated by the permit system. The ee for review and inspection of these improvements is 5% of the first $100,000 of the estimated construction costs; 4% of anything over $100,000 but less than $200,000, and 3% of anything over $200,000. Half the fee must be paid upon application. 2. Separate permits for water meters, side sewer, irrigation meters and backflow device is regiuired. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS 1. Nore cc: Kayren Kittrick OPERTY SERVICES FEE REVIEW #2 - O I q X DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET 0 PLAN REVIEW ROUTING SLIP 0 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET 0 OTHER APPLICANT: Joe) 1=44iL iJ , RECEIVED FROM JOB ADDRESS: 1532 N, M 1rDLL -. WO# 789 (date) NATURE OF WORK: C,l-105 Uc-, 'z'`&GeE L s. GREEN# ❑ SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AND CONNECTION FEES APPLIED NEED MORE INFORMATION: Cl LEGAL DESCRIPTION ❑ SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AND CONNECTION FEES ESTIMATED 0 SQUARE FOOTAGE ❑ VICINITY MAP ❑ NOT APPROVED FOR APPLICATION OF FEES 0 FRONT FOOTAGE A OTHER ❑ VESTED ❑ NOT VESTED } -i-pr4,1_ 1.1EVNJ ❑ This fee review supersedes and cancels fee review# dated IMpE1'/ICU S ❑ PARENT PID#(subject to change)_Fo1R rU U• SUBJECT PROPERTY PID# I. `32 80 -12 F3 S 0 King Co.Tax Acct#(new) It is the intent of this development fee analysis to put the developer/owner on notice,that the fees quoted below may be applicable to the subject site upon development of the property. All quoted fees are potential charges that may be due and payable at the time the construction permit is issued to install the on-site and off-site improvements(i.e.underground utilities,street improvements,etc.) Triggering mechanisms for the SDC fees will be based on current City ordinances and determined by the applicable Utility Section. Please note that these fees are subject to change without notice. Final fees will be based on rates in effect at time of Building Permit/Construction Permit application. The following quoted fees do NOT include inspection fees,side sewer permits,r/w permit fees or the cost of water meters. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PARCEL METHOD OF ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS NO. NO. ASSESSMENT UNITS OR FEE Latecomer Agreement(pvt)WATER -O- Latecomer Agreement(pvt)WASTEWATER -p- Latecomer Agreement(pvt)OTHER - O- Special Assessment District/WATER /O- Special Assessment District/WASTEWATER Joint Use Agreement(METRO) Local Improvement District * — Traffic Benefit Zones $75.00 PER TRIP,CALCULATED BY TRANSPORTATION FUTURE OBLIGATIONS — SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-WATER #OF UNITS/ SDC FEE 0 Pd Prev. 0 Partially Pd(Ltd Exemption) ❑ Never Pd SQ. FIG. Single family residential $1,105/unit x Mobile home dwelling unit$885/unit in park Apartment, Condo$665/unit not in CD or COR zones x Commercial/Industrial, $0.154/sq. ft. of property(not less than$1105.00)X NE I O, I 5 3F X 45 1)562.59 Boeing,by Special Agreement/Footprint of Bldg plus 15 ft perimeter t2,soo Gem threshold) SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-WASTEWATER ❑ Pd Prev. 0 Partially Pd (Ltd Exemption) 0 Never Pd Single family residential dwelling unit$760/unit x Mobile home dwelling unit$610/unit x Apartment, Condo$455/unit not in CD or COR zones x Commercial/Industrial, $0.106/sq. ft. of property (not less than$760.00) X ' IC)) 1455p. A $ I)075.37 REDEVELOPMENT CREDIT: (New-Old Flow)/New Flow X Above Fees M,ay pp ■ SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-SURFACEWATER boA.t �tG M e44/ATEl 's w 3 eut' p �I ❑ Pd Prev. 0 Partially Pd (Ltd Exemption) 0 Never Wes. � 'o/o4JL , d � Single family residential and mobile home dwelling unit$525/unit x All other properties$0.183/sq ft of new impervious area of property x WOKf,l LU-rcr A J.., 3...E / 1Mp-RVle Li (not less than$525.00) AEA c c41 cu1.4rt 101.1 PRELIMINARY TOTAL $ / m ' - /.c /!7?1 ; Signature of viewi l Authority ATE ti *If subject property is within an LID, it is developers responsibility to check with the Finance Dept. for paid/un-paid status. **The square footage figures used are taken from the King County Assessor's map and are approximate only. 0 0 EFFECTIVE January 4,2001 N, 0 4 S03 . f,::.^.}+C4Y;tY..:`::::i:. • + (. .© + viwAv lily" AI �Y+Y.iJ'{A•SIAti�Y.F.{. LL • .141 y Si =ra!-..._y-_::.:� .i_+'c.''. s•:fiNi::.kr..`.:-..,„,::-.> ..,, ......:,:„.s.:„.....::>::ii:;-_s`S':;-Is }�c?!fe5.. sN.}:.':ca4steotiti - k _ r WATIONLSBE Project Name ,.)oOs 3TuV- 6/k,1 L 1L•N -r\ Project Address IS3a IJ• i-kig-NoI3 ST, Contact Person I,-\L 0 13 ' Address \\O \c\'``'. ( -t- tam' SeTklit6 qN?)-- - Phone Number A- 3 J ‘\e‘,a" Permit Number LL R DA-Ob It • Project Description lUtl\L\ S 51 [)u-SaA,‹) t.u) DWG 1t1wC" 4.7u* •,-(ttv\;-k_\Lo h$6 6 Land Use Type: . Method of Calculation: lc.0k G A,A;;,.. 0 Residential CITE Trip Generation Manual ❑ Retail 0 Traffic Study C151) m •..-0,..Ne1w�, 0 Non-retail 0 Other tamed 2.50 o y Calculation: _ (t\o) SF4?- t- c1•S-7 •• - .10;1�a ! - 1o•,I\a x 2>. _ .a5.D:6\ c� 0 • �--- ~ - 9. s 7 . . • I6 .-/a I ,1 1- `75 - 1111 G1• ° Transportation Mitigation Fee: 5 1)01. Calculated by: - 1`��G(1lab Date: - Account Number: • Date of Payment City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DE PARTMENT: yt ?e f S1 fv'1Lk� COMMENTS DUE: APRIL- ,'2002 APPLICATION I10: LUA02-006, CU-H, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 28,20027 ELOPMENT SERVICES APPLICANT: Nail Thompson PROJECT MANAGER: Jason Jordan CITY OF RENTON PROJECT TITLE: Joos Storage Building WORK ORDER NO: 78936 MAR 2 9 2002 LOCATION: 1532 N. Marion Street `, SITE AREA: 1C,145 sf BUILDING AREA(gross): 10,114 sf REC I �/ED SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL:The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit for the construction of a self-storage buildings located within the CA zoning designation. The building is pro,posed to have a footprint of 7,605 square feet with a mezzanine level totaling 10,114 gross square feet of building area. The project is planned to be approximately 28 feet in height upon completion. '-he development includes street frontage improvements, on-site landscaping, and 3 internal parking spacirs. With the development of the self-storage building, the applicant would demolish the existing single-family residence. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Ligh'Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet RECEIVED MAR 2 9 2002 CITY OF RENTON UTILITY SYSTEMS B. POLICY-IIELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-Rt SLATED COMMENTS 42, 1/ -ram We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additi••.1 information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 1//01V0 r Representative Date Signature of or or Authorized Rep e Routing Rev.10/93 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 5'or-(acclida<5.1eloa�tr- COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 4, 2002 1'� APPLICATION NO: LUA02-006, CU-H, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 28,2002EVELOPMENT SERVICES APPLICANT: NI:il Thompson PROJECT MANAGER: Jason Jordan CITY OF RENTON PROJECT TITLE:: Joos Storage Building WORK ORDER NO: 78936 MAR 2 9 2002 LOCATION: 15:32 N. Marion Street SITE AREA: 10 145 sf BUILDING AREA(gross): 10,114 sfECEIVED SUMMARY OF I'ROPOSAL:The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit for the construction of a self-storage buildings located within the CA zoning designation. The building is proposed to have a footprint of 7,605 square feet with a mezzanine level totaling 10,114 gross :square feet of building area. The project is planned to be approximately 28 feet in height upon completion. The development includes street frontage improvements, on-site landscaping, and 3 internal parking space s. With the development of the self-storage building,the applicant would demolish the existing single-family 'esidence. A. ENVIRON'IENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Us( Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Hea th Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-F ELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RE LATED COMMENTS We have review(d this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where add tional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 1/770 Sign of Dire;tor or or A�ed Representative Date Routing Rev.10/93 CITY OF RENTON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT NEIGHBORHOODS , AND STRATEGIC PLANNING MEMORANDUM DATE: April 4, 2002 TO: Jason Jordan FROM: cre/Don Erickson SUBJECT: Joos Storage Building, 1532 N.Marion Street;LUA-02-006, CU- H,ECF(PID 135230-1285) The subject 10,160 square foot site is located in North Renton east of Factory Avenue N between Factory Place N and Houser on N Marion Street. The site is across the street from an auto body repair shop and currently has a vacant single-family dwelling on it. North of N. 4th Street is the Paccar Kenworth Truck Plant site which is zoned IH (Industrial Heavy). The triangular area bounded by Factory Place N on the west and Houser on the east is designated Employment Area— Commercial on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. It is zoned CA (Commercial Arterial) consistent with this designation. The proponents are proposing a 10,114 square foot storage warehouse. The structure is made of a series of vaulted roof forms rising to a maximum height of 47 feet for the main structure. The exterior of the building would consist of a combination of decorative split-faced concrete modular units for the first 12 feet along the front and north elevations and portions of the east and west elevations,with the rest of the exterior having flat un-corrugated-metal panel siding. Architecturally,the form of the building is industrial but its curved roof forms and decorative metal trellis' should help soften its appearance. The applicants' landscape plan indicates that two 24" diameter Cedar trees are to be removed in the front yard. Such landscaping should be retained,if at all possible because of its ability to reduce visual impacts(Policy LU-175). Street trees would be a welcome addition on N. Marion Street, particularly if these two significant existing trees must be removed. Relevant Comprehensive Plan Land Use Policies: Policy LU-170. Individual development project should be encouraged to: a. minimized curb cuts and share access points, b. provide for internal circulation among adjacent parcels, c. share parking facilities, d. centralize signing, e. create a unified style of development, and f provide landscaping and streetscaping to soften visual impacts. Policy LU-175. Landscape buffers, additional setbacks, reduced height, and other screening devices should be employed to reduce the impacts (e.g. visual, noise, odor, light) on adjacent, less intensive uses. Policy LU-178. Retail and/or service uses should comprise a majority of the total development within Employment Area—Commercial designations. Joos Storage Building,LUA• )06,CU-H,ECF 2 04/04/02 Policy LU-181. Development should be designed to be compatible with adjacent, less intensive uses, e.g. lighting,fences, landscaping, setbacks should all be considered during site design. Conclusion: The proposed storage facility is located in somewhat of a commercial "backwater" area off the nearest main arterial, Sunset Boulevard, to the east. In staff's opinion more significant landscaping should be provided along N Marion Street, particularly if the two existing 24"diameter Cedar trees in the existing front yard near the sidewalk are removed. Policies LU-170 and LU-175 would appear to support such a condition. Overall, this is an attractive project which should fit in with other CA Zone uses in this area e.g. Dunn Lumber, Seattle Opera Warehouse,etc. cc: Rebecca Lind H:\EDNSPUnterdepartmental\Development Review\Green File\Comments\Joos Storage Building.doc\d City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIR DNMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: oyy, " 'Q ITV , COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 4, 2002 APPLICATION JO: LUA02-006,CU-H, ECF �' DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 28,2002 APPLICANT: Neil Thompson PROJECT MANAGER: Jason Jordan PROJECT TITLE: Joos Storage Building WORK ORDER NO: 78936 MA.Pr LOCATION: 1E32 N. Marion Street ' ECO. SITE AREA: 1(,145 sf BUILDING AREA(gross): 10,114 sf SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL:The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and a Hearing Examiner Conditional 1. se Permit for the construction of a self-storage buildings located within the CA zoning designation. The building is proposed to have a footprint of 7,605 square feet with a mezzanine level totaling 10,114 gross square feet of building area. The project is planned to be approximately 28 feet in height upon completion. the development includes street frontage improvements, on-site landscaping, and 3 internal parking spac 3s. With the development of the self-storage building, the applicant would demolish the existing single-family residence. A. ENVIROF MENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Us a Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental He.Ith Public Services Energy/ Historic./Cultural Natural Resource: Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY ?ELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-R,ELATED COMMENTS We have review 3d this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where adc itional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Din ctor or Authorized Representative Date Routing Rev.10/93 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:(ovis ytt o sov-VicpS COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 4, 2002 APPLICATION NO: LUA02-006, CU-H, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 28,2002)EVELOPMENT SERVICES APPLICANT: N=ail Thompson PROJECT MANAGER: Jason Jordan CITY OF RENTON PROJECT TITL Joos Storage Building WORK ORDER NO: 78936 Ma P. 2002 LOCATION: 15 32 N. Marion Street SITE AREA: 1C,145 sf BUILDING AREA(gross): 10,114 sf PEDEIVED SUMMARY OF 'ROPOSAL:The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and a Hearing Examiner Conditional 1.se Permit for the construction of a self-storage buildings located within the CA zoning designation. The building is proposed to have a footprint of 7,605 square feet with a mezzanine level totaling 10,114 gross square feet of building area. The project is planned to be approximately 28 feet in height upon completion. 'he development includes street frontage improvements, on-site landscaping, and 3 internal parking spaci:s. With the development of the self-storage building, the applicant would demolish the existing single-family residence. A. ENVIRONVENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Us 3 Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Her Ith Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON APR 082002 RECEIVED B. POLICY-!?ELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RI"LATED COMMENTS ��^^ �f " /// F I O C l� l' L o r vv1 "�G -4 a_ �t vI , 1� e �� /U�C— 114-7 / 9 pre — 2re Cav� rvt t S We have review td this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where adc tional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Lb Le' 0 z Signature of Dirc tor or Authorized Representative Date Routing Rev.10/93 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public VvorKs ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DE PARTMENT: \ 1 1 COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 4, 2002 APPLICATION 110: LUA02-006,CU-H, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 28,2002 n APPLICANT: NA Thompson PROJECT MANAGER: Jason Jordan K n g rn s1 PROJECT TITL=: Joos Storage Building WORK ORDER NO: 78936 z C = LOCATION: 15 32 N. Marion Street -<7 oo SITE AREA: 1C,145 sf BUILDING AREA(gross): 1 0,1 14 sf rnz, �' i SUMMARY OF 'ROPOSAL:The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and a Hektimg Ex amineD Conditional Use Permit for the construction of a self-storage buildings located within the CAizioning designation. The building is proposed to have a footprint of 7,605 square feet with a mezzanine level totaling 10,114 gross Square feet of building area. The project is planned to be approximately 28 feet in height upon completion. "'he development includes street frrontage improvements, on-site landscaping, and 3 internal parking spaces. With the development of the self-storage building, the applicant would demolish the existing single-family residence. A. ENVIRON 1AENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housin. -_-- Air Aesthetics Water Licht/Glare Plants Recreation -_-_- Land/Shoreline Us?, Utilities Animals Trans.ortation -_-_-_ Environmental Heath Public Services --- Energy/ Historic./Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14 000 Feet jute t a,c,t 1 77'mctezn/zeizYlic/ '° - /- B. POLICY-IIELATED COMMENTS /-6 1 g( X.&, MOP 0,a- C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS l t 7b ILG ICo v � We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where ditional information is ne d to properly assess this proposal. -2/iL9'(_4(/ C-17(-/Z----- i/-1? VeR Signatur of Director or Authorized Representative Date Routing Rev.10/93 Proposed Mitigation Measures: G1� • 1. The applicant will be required to pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee based on$0.52 per square foot of new construction. • OD + 2. The applicant will be required to pay the appropriate Traffic Mitigation Fee based on$75 per net new average daily trip associated with the project. �� ^• 3. Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Measures shall be Installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project. NOTICE O F APPLICATION 4. The applicant will be required to follow the recommendations contained with the Geotechn'Icel Engineering Study prepared for this project with regard to the disturbance,preparation end construction of the ate. AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON- Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Jeeon E.Jordan,Associate Planner'Development Services Division,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on April 12,2002.This matter is also SICINIFICANCE-MITIGATED(DNS-M) scheduled for a public hearing on May 21,2002,at9:00 AM,Council Chambers,Seventh Floor,Renton City Hall,1055 South Grady Way,Renton.If you are Interested In attending the hearing,please contact the Development Services Division,(425)430-7282,to ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled.If comment.cannot be submitted In writing by the date Indicated above,you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments on the proposal before the Hearing Examiner.It you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive DATE: March 28,2002 additional information by mail,please contact the project manager.Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project, LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-02.006,CU-H,ECF CONTACT PERSON: Jason E.Jordan (425)430-7219 APPLICATION NAME: Joos Storage Building I PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant Is requesting Environmental(SEPA)Review and■Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit for the construction of a self-storage buildings located within the CA zoning -- • "'"''-'-"—'-'- designation. The building Is proposed to have a footprint of 7,605 square feet with s mezzanine level totaling • • 10,114 grog.square feet of building area. The project Is planned to be approximately 28 feet In height upon completion.The development Includes street frontage Improvements,on-site landscaping,end 3 Internal parking 7 . ' spaces. With the development of the self-storage building,the applicant would demolish the existing single- • family residence- - • PROJECT LOCATION: 1532 N.Marion Street Pacer xr,onOv neck Plant \ s, :.� OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED(DNS-M):As the Lead Agency,the City of i. , \ Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project.Therefore, , 'N 4usl - Id as permitted under the RCW 43.210.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS-M process to gNe notice that a p,N4 r \ DNS-M is likely to be issued.Comment periods for the project end the proposed DNS-M are Integrated Into a single 113 R. �IJ ria�`�, comment period.There will be no comment period following the Issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non- ) ^'� age _ 9 'ly Significance•Mitigated(DNS-M).A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. "A 9j .v /�,_ —I , PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: January 17,2002 ( 5 s a a�� . ,:d❑pep r9.,•�I ccif rwrr NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: March 28,2002 ....tit Permits/Review Requested: Environmental(SEPA)Review,Hearing Examiner Conditional Use ^ •_1:,yys,y-g• c ". ! / Permit are at t - • Other Permits which may ore required: Building,Demolition,Construction and Utility Permits 'r- :'a�1:-n Soup` '' *� - w _, 's'aew wNa. • Requested Studies: N/A tl o ref `�er'.'"�w� . .r..k. IYe,a •. • r .• Location where application may • reek / e be reviewed: Planning/Building/Publb Works DNLsion,Development Services Department, • ' it sMe. e• 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 i��. N5 t„d St ■ .., .. PUBLIC HEARING: Public onhearingCouncil scheduled May 2r,gs 02 nfate:00 Renton the ring Examiner - et C • - • . • In Renton Council Chambers.0 Hearings begin at AM on the 7th floor of the - cA - '�-t'� b • new Renton City Hat located at 1055 Grady Way South. . ,. ; CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: MppWYN - . Analytical process . Land U.: The subject site is designated Employment Area-Commercial(EAC)on the / * IIcInIt Plan Citys Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map end Commercial Arterial(CA)or the City.Zoning Map.The proposed use of the site,es a self-service storage I r facility,is considered a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use in the CA zone. ,"-s .ee. n.-+,• Environmental Documents that If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project,complete Evaluate the Proposed Project: Geotechnical Analysis this form and return to:City of Renton,Development Planning,1055 So.Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055. Development Reguletlt na File No/Name:LUA-02-006,CU-H,ECF/Jooa Storage Building Used For Project Millg,lion: The protect will be subject to the Cltya SEPA Ordinance,Zoning Code,Public Works Standards,Uniform Building Code,Uniform Fire Code,and other NAME: applicable codes end regulations ae appropriate. ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO.: NOTICE OF APPLICATION NOTICE OF APPLICATION it.a_a i a t a MARILYN KAMCHEFF NOTARY PUBLIC CERTIFICATION STATE OF WASHINGTON COMMISSION EXPIRES JUNE 29, 2003 I, gb zip air\LI I , hereby certify that S copies of the above document were posted by me 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on Signed: 22 _ 6/6- '2_. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn before me,a Notary Public,in and for the St of Washington residingtin c,¢--✓I�-e7-1 ,on the S n-►9 day of C u Q o-00-c,--;..... MARILYN KAMCHEFF MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES: 6-29-03 r4 �,LNNT��� NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON- SIGNIFICANCE - MITIGATED (DNS-M) DATE: March 28,2002 LAND USE NUMB ER: LUA-02-006,CU-H,ECF APPLICATION NA ME: Joos Storage Building PROJECT DESCF IPTION: The applicant Is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit for the construction of a self-storage buildings located within the CA zoning designation. The building Is proposed to have a footprint of 7,605 square feet with a mezzanine level totaling 10,114 gross sql:are feet of building area. The project Is planned to be approximately 28 feet In height upon completion. The ievelopment includes street frontage Improvements,on-site landscaping,and 3 Internal parking spaces. With th,, development of the self-storage building, the applicant would demolish the existing single- family residence. PROJECT LOCA1 ION: 1532 N.Marion Street OPTIONAL DETE 1MINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED(DNS-M): As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has detern fined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore, as permitted under the RCW 43.21 C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS-M process to give notice that a DNS-M is likely to )e issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period. '-here will be no comment period following the Issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non- Significance-Mitic ated(DNS-M). A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICE TION DATE: January 17,2002 NOTICE OF COM'LETE APPLICATION: March 28,2002 Permits/Review RI quested: Environmental(SEPA)Review,Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit Other Permits whir.h may be required: Building,Demolition,Construction and Utility Permits Requested Studio: WA • Location where aF olication may be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 PUBLIC HEARING: Public hearing scheduled for May 21,2002 before the Renton Hearing Examiner in Renton Council Chambers. Hearings begin at 9:00 AM on the 7th floor of the new Renton City Hall located at 1055 Grady Way South. CONSISTENCY C,VERVIEW: Analytical proce:s • Land Use: The subject site is designated Employment Area—Commercial(EAC)on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map and Commercial Arterial(CA)or the City's Zoning Map. The proposed use of the site,as a self-service storage facility,is considered a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use in the CA zone. Environmental C ocuments that Evaluate the Pro3osed Project: Geotechnical Analysis Development Re gulations Used For Projec Mitigation: The project will be subject to the City's SEPA Ordinance,Zoning Code,Public Works Standards,Uniform Building Code,Uniform Fire Code,and other applicable codes and regulations as appropriate. • NOTICE OF APPUC,TION Proposed Mitigation Measures: 1. The applicant will be required to pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee based on$0.52 per square foot of new construction. 2. The applicant will be required to pay the appropriate Traffic Mitigation Fee based on$75 per net new average daily trip associated with the project. 3. Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Measures shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project. 4. The applicant will be required to follow the recommendations contained with the Geotechnical Engineering Study prepared for this project with regard to the disturbance,preparation and construction of the site. Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Jason E.Jordan,Associate Planner,Development Services Division,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on April 12,2002. This matter is also scheduled for a public hearing on May 21,2002,at 9:00 AM,Council Chambers,Seventh Floor,Renton City Hall,1055 . South Grady Way,Renton. If you are interested In attending the hearing,please contact the Development Services Division,(425)430-7282,to ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled. If comments cannot be submitted in writing by the date Indicated above,you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments on the proposal before the Hearing Examiner. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional information by mail,please contact the project manager. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: Jason E.Jordan (425)430-7219 PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION - • .Paccar t(anworth Truck Plant 3 c \wa /� > • r _ LS114, 6M%A•iwu�l at A/ c Mlto Tr+�s• .M .. y.,o+K cc CA n° -1-�i . ! N 4thSt .. uT' .- rna aw voa.•b�a �§CAI \ ! • . CA iii. - ►�a CA: 9 IamwwIT • tad" z Ii t1'¢ Et i u T o u.P.s...as c...WA• nfi8 R8ta n {i> %\t_A 0 •Et-Y 0^.10Y -....J` '.•ems Iw4T • 0 t3 a p S' .0 1-i 01 . .� I owv ua..Ies a II • n :4:1 • MTT afccnw adrar • . 11 n 13 ,•0%ululexw' ' �S N Marlon St. _•• •- ' : Pi nn a a Ct Irian\ Wir n C ��LcK rD r:.v :/ t7 Al1,�^ n-t?it 0 tl t10 0 t1 ' .tea` -• 4', 7 " ,,�u.6.66T 144.6.0..•.r./ • — • .N 3rd�Stt�+ .1' . • :a ..b.1. [tall---. R O A r1 L/. pp �{ r R� t7 0 R8 (3/ 0�_rwars.uWw. r7 11 R rra.uo r. ..�y�. d • to A 3 CI ' ,...,0a0•NI+o...m. .. / . rt o 6rookd b .hw.nl.ax • fi rj ,. P A -wog uwtwc a rhaci+`e . ww�.W j. It. : lb.. . . 118 118 R -----• , • N 2nd St• - R10 R10 g10 - cA CA CA— CA .. "T" • . 6r.o.--- NY.N N . ':k/icinity Plan • • -I1I!•u.WI I .tOo . keT• I • • r.M•Y re.n..66,u.11...Kowa,P^ '•..44 . ._ 01 w -x k.TI-p.H C uor wf tkrusx M ullln••., . If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project, complete this form and return to:City of Renton, Development Planning, 1055 So.Grady Way, Renton,WA 98055. File No./Name: LUA-02-006,CU-H, ECF/Joos Storage Building • NAME: ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO.: NOTICE OF APPUCATION CITY OF RENTON "LL Planning/Building/PublicWorks Department J Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator • March 28,2002 Mr.Thompson 1102—19 h Avenue East Seattle, WA 98112 SUBJECT: Joos Storage Building; LUA 02-006, CU-H, ECF Dear Mr.Thompson: The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on April 23, 2002. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, Washington, on May 21, 2002 at 9:00 AM to consider the proposed project. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you one week before the hearing. If the Environmental Determination is appealed,the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. Please contact me, at(425)430-7219, if you have any questions. Sincerely, J son E.J dan Associate Planner cc: Mr. Paul N.Joos/Owner acceptance 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 RENTON AHEAD OF THE CURVE CO This paper contains 50%recycled material.30%nest civic, co m Lesley Nishihira- 1532 North Marion Street — mit Application #LUA02-006 Page 1 From: "Neal Thompson" <neal@rhnewellaia.com> To: <Inishihira@ci.renton.wa.us> Date: 2/14/02 3:22PM Subject: 1532 North Marion Street - Permit Application #LUA02-006 Dear Lesley: Please place the above referenced application on hold. I am unable to make a decision in the variance application for the 2nd story. Our client, Paul Joos, is out of the country until next week. Upon his return we will decide which direction the application should proceed. If there is any additional information that you need, please contact me. Thank you Neal Thompson Roger H. Newell, AIA (206) 322-1192 tel. (206) 322-5161 fax neal@rhnewellaia.com 'ITY OF RENTON 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Printed: 01-17-2002 Land Use Actions RECEIPT Permit#: LUA02-006 Payment Made: 01/17/2002 03:07 PM Receipt Number: R0200286 Total Payment: 2,510.54 Payee: PAUL & DESNEE JOOS Current Payment Made to the Following Items: Trans Account Code Description Amount 5009 000.345.81.00.0006 Conditional Use Fees 2,000.00 5010 000.345.81.00.0007 Environmental Review 500.00 5955 000.05.519.90.42.1 Postage 10.54 DEVELOPtv1 Payments made for this receipt C�7 y OF RE oNv.Ak. JAN17 . �► Trans Method Description Amount /� � 2 Payment Check #6583 2,510.54 RECEIVED Account Balances Trans Account Code Description Balance Due 3021 303.000.00.345.85 Park Mitigation Fee .00 5006 000.345.81.00.0002 Annexation Fees .00 5007 000.345.81.00.0003 Appeals/Waivers .00 5008 000.345.81.00.0004 Binding Site/Short Plat .00 5009 000.345.81.00.0006 Conditional Use Fees .00 5010 000.345.81.00.0007 Environmental Review .00 5011 000.345.81.00.0008 Prelim/Tentative Plat .00 5012 000.345.81.00.0009 Final Plat .00 5013 000.345.81.00.0010 PUD .00 5014 000.345.81.00.0011 Grading & Filling Fees .00 5015 000.345.81.00.0012 Lot Line Adjustment .00 5016 000.345.81.00.0013 Mobile Home Parks .00 5017 000.345.81.00.0014 Rezone .00 5018 000.345.81.00.0015 Routine Vegetation Mgmt .00 5019 000.345.81.00.0016 Shoreline Subst Dev .00 5020 000.345.81.00.0017 Site Plan Approval .00 5021 000.345.81.00.0018 Special Permit Fees .00 5022 000.345.81.00.0019 Variance Fees .00 5023 0 .00 5024 000.345.81.00.0024 Conditional Approval Fee .00 5036 000.345.81.00.0005 Comprehensive Plan Amend .00 5909 000.341.60.00.0024 Booklets/EIS/Copies .00 5941 000.341.50.00.0000 Maps (Taxable) .00 5954 604.237.00.00.0000 Special Deposits .00 5955 000.05.519.90.42.1 Postage .00 5998 000.231.70.00.0000 Tax .00 CITY OF RENTON 'ELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION LAND USE PERMIT . MASTER APPLICATION PROPERTY 4WNER(S1 PROJECT INFORMATION Noted If the e i rttote than one legal or�tnet please attach en dditionaE:: notatiZei#.;MasterAppJicaYiorsz�ifC 8act#oWneC.> PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: NAME: Paul N. Joos Joos Storage Building PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION: ADDRESS: 13510 SE 50th Place 1532 North Marion Street CITY: Bellevue, WA ZIP: 98006 KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): 135230 — 1285-00 TELEPHONE NUMBER: 425-643-8218 EXISTING LAND USE(S): (1) Single Family Residence (Vacant) APPLICANT;i':(if other than owner} PROPOSED LAND USES: NAME: Neal Thompson New 10, 114 SF Storage Building COMPANY (if applicable): EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: Roger H. Newell, AIA Employment Area Commercial ADDRESS: 1102 — 19th Avenue East PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): CITY: Seattle, WA ZIP: 98112 EXISTING ZONING: Commercial Arterial (CA) TELEPHONE NUMBER: 206-322-1192 PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): DEVELOPMENTCIYO N-Y04(NG (.,ONTACT'PERSON SITE AREA (SQ. FT. OR ACREAGE): NAME: Neal Thompson MAR 2 p 10,145 Square Feet RECEIVED COMPANY (if applicable): PROJECT VALUE: Roger H. Newell, AIA $405,000.00 ADDRESS: IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? 1102 — 19th Avenue East No CITY: ZIP: Seattle, WA 98112 IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA? TELEPHONE NUMBER and E-MAIL ADDRESS: No 206-322-1192 NEAP C'RNNEWELLAI4.Com LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (Attach separate sheet if necessary) Lot 25 and 26, Block 12, Car Works Addition to Renton, According to the Plat thereof, recorded in Volume 15 of Plats, Page 47, King County, Washington TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES Check.:all application types that:.a0ply--City staff w 11 determine feed, _ANNEXATION $ SUBDIVISION: — COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT $ — REZONE $ _ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ — SPECIAL PERMIT $ _ SHORT PLAT $ _TEMPORARY PERMIT $ _TENTATIVE PLAT $ R CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ =,�C)61,CC) _ PRELIMINARY PLAT $ — SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ FINAL PLAT $ _ _ GRADE & FILL PERMIT $ (NO. CU. YDS: ) PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ VARIANCE $ — (FROM SECTION: ) _ PRELIMINARY — WAIVER $ FINAL WETLAND PERMIT $_ — ROUTINE VEGETATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ _ BINDING SITE PLAN $ SHORELINE REVIEWS: _ SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ CONDITIONAL USE $— _ VARIANCE $ _ EXEMPTION $No Charge /NVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ 5O.00 REVISION $ — AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I, (Print Name) (:)4"A1 11/4J' 3C" 's ,declare that I am (please check one) )(the owner of the property involved in this application,_the authorized representative to act for the property owner(please attach proof of authorization), and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. p1 0-0-c ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for th State of G ,*-,residing at (Name o Owner/Representative) - 20on the -A day of 21. (Signature of Owner/Representative) a A AXW(�RTHY — L�it�(w n R+ NOTARY PURE �( Ignatu a of Notary Public)�5--- _.) STA1 F OF WASHINGTON _. t „��ESS► :•::.3CPIFtIrS `( trs sectem c o: eted by City Staff.) 81: Fife iVun ber. "' -"' . AAD BSP CAF S >✓AP U CPA CU . CU CF LtA :MHP ;FPUO;'. FP PP R RVMP ;SA A : SA H SHPL.-A.. SHPL-H SIB SM.. :SME .;TP V<::A V»H W T6r:AuFEES: $ c `: .''r TOTAL'POSTAGE PROVIDED $ , . ..( ... MASTERAP.DOC REVISED 03/00 CITY OF RENTON • VELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION LAND USE PERMIT MASTER APPLICATION PROPERTY OWNER(S) PROECT',INFORMATION '' Note: If the•a is more than one legal owner, please attach an additional Ac t8tiled t">.ster.Appl cation ft3f 80Ct iiVitier• PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: NAME: DE snee M. Joos Joos Storage Building PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION: ADDRESS: 13510 SE 50th Place 1532 North Marion Street CITY: BE'IIE'VUe, WA ZIP: 98006 KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): 135230 — 1285-00 TELEPHONE NUMBEF: 425-643-8218 EXISTING LAND USE(S): (1) Single Family Residence (Vacant) APPLIC ANT (if other than owner) PROPOSED LAND USES: NAME: Neal Thompson New 1Lf,9 4 SF Storage Building COMPANY (if applic EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: Roger H. Newell, AIA Employment Area Commercial ADDRESS: 1' 02 — 19th Avenue East PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): CITY: Seattle, WA ZIP: 98112 EXISTING ZONING: Commercial Arterial (CA) TELEPHONE NUMBER: 206-322-1192 PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): CONTACT PERSON SITE AREA (SQ. FT. OR ACREAGE): NAME: Neal Thompson 10,145 Square Feet COMPANY (if applicable): PROJECT VALUE: Roger H. Newell, AIA $."95,000.00 ADDRESS: IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? 1 102 — 19th Avenue East No CITY: ZIP: Seattle, WA 98112 IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA? TELEPHONE NUMBER and E-MAIL ADDRESS: No 206-322-1192 NeAL a/ZIA/EWELLAfA•GOM L'=GAL DESCRIPTION nF PROPERTY (Attach separate sheet if necessary) Lot 25 and 26, Block 12, Car Works Addition to Renton, According to the Plat thereof, recorded in Volume 15 of Plats, Page 47, King County, Washington >.:;>. TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES ChEck ai a splacation types that apply -City staff will determine fees• — ANNEXATION $ SUBDIVISION: _ COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT $ — REZONE $ _ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ _ SPECIAL PER viIT $ _ SHORT PLAT $ _ TEMPORARY PERMIT $ _ TENTATIVE PLAT $ -- _ ''CONDITIONA_ USE PERMIT $ PRELIMINARY PLAT $ _ SITE PLAN APROVAL $ _ FINAL PLAT $ _ GRADE & FIL_ PERMIT $ (NO. CU YDS: ) PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ VARIANCE $ (FROM E ECTION: ) _ PRELIMINARY _ WAIVER $ _ FINAL _WETLAND PERMIT $ — ROUTINE VEGETATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ _ BINDING SITE: PLAN $ SHORELINE RE\IEWS: _ SUBSTANTIA L DEVELOPMENT $ _ CONDITIONAL USE $ _ VARIANCE $ _ EXEMPTION $No Charge — ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ REVISION $ �/ AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I, (Print Name) be.5 flee_ /`l • JOO>ieclare that I am (please check one) L'the owner of the property involved in this application, _the authorized represerr ative to act for the property owner (please attach proof of authorization), and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the it formation herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and esNee �// oo_s for the State of l o-Lh,-�{,..—residing at (Name of Ow er/Re resentative) • t v.J Y'+ on the,; day of e (. 20�. 7 �` A AXWQRTHY (Signature of Owner/Representative) NOTARY puBLl '� `� `^) 1 OTAR 1 Mature of Notary ublic) smi t OF WASHINGT ::<,.. ... C©N!'h 'sWN CXPiRES ( • I1e1 a ed'by City Staff.) CE xFile Number: '' A AAD BSP CAP-S CAP-U CPA CU-A CU-H ECF LLA `<iiii:;;:iiig `M ff ...,FPUD' FP PP R ''RVMP SA-A '' SA-H 'SHPL-A SHPL-H SP SM c,DME TP V-A' V-B V-H W iigiNiiiiiii;iiiMaNi TOTAL FEES: $ TOTAL POSTAGE PROVIDED: $ MASTERAP.DOC REVISED 03/00 ............... .. ........... ENVIRONMENTALECC L ST PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or"does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NON PROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. DEV , CliY OF,rNf i;''I i3 DEVEL* MENT PLAN�*JG CI •F RENTO> (` JAN .:302 REC IV:- r • A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Joos Storage Building 2. Name of Applicant: Roger H. Newell, AIA 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Roger H. Newell, AIA 1102 — 19th Avenue East, Seattle, WA 98112 (206) 322-1192 Contact: Neal Thompson 4. Date checklist prepared: 22 March 2002 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton, Planning/ Building/ Public Works 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Construction Start: 01 September 2002 Construction Finish: 31, January 2003 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Soils Report by Geotech Consultants (11-16-2000); 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. Conditional Use Permit 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Building permit, electrical permit, plumbing permit, security alarm permit, temporary electrical permit, sewer permit. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. Demolish existing single family residence and construct 1-story with mezzanine, 10,114 SF storage building. The site is 80.0 X 126.82' (10,145SF) 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographical map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Legal Description: Lots 25 & 26, block 12, Car Works addition to Renton, according to the plat there of, recorded in Vol. 15 of Plats, Page 47, King County, Washington Address: 1532 North Marion Street, Renton, WA B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountains, other: b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) 0% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, and muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural souls, specify them and note any prime farmland. 15' of medium-dense sand and silty sand overlying 15' of soft, moderately compressible silt, silty sand, and peat d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. None e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Approximately 479 cubic yards of excavation incidental to construction, and no anticipated fill f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Temporary minor site erosion during excavation for foundation. g. About what percentage of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (i.e.: asphalt or buildings)? Approximately 92% impervious surface coverage h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Temporary filter fabric will be used at property boundaries during construction. Landscaping used for permanent erosion control. 2. Air a. What type of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e.: dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Temporary emissions from construction vehicles, temporary construction odors, permanent emissions from autos. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odors that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Water spray during construction. 3. Water a Surface Water: 1) Is there any water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, and wet lands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No. 2) Will the project require any work over, in or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Yes, seasonal surface water to be collected and diverted into approved storm drainage discharge. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. b Ground Water: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. 4 • 2) Describe water material that will be discharged into the ground from septic • tanks or other sources, if any (i'e.: domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None. c. Water Runoff(including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff(including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow?Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Storm water to be collected in downspouts and catch basins and diverted to storm drainage systems (see Utility/Drainage Plan) and diverted to storm sewer. 2) Could waste materials enter the ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface waters? If so, generally describe. Drainage control systems (see Utility/Drainage Plan), permanent landscaping. 4. Plants a. Check or circle type of vegetation found on the site: _Deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other _Evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other _Shrubs—Juniper Grass Pasture _Crop or grain _Wet soil plants: water lily, eelgrass, and milfoil, other Other type of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Dead pines, cedars. Two cedar trees and existing sod will be removed. New vegetation will be provided per the proposed landscape plan. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Proposed new landscaping per plans • 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals that have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: Starlings, crows Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: Rats, squirrels, possums Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, and shellfish, other: None b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kind of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar)will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Natural gas heating b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Building will conform to Washington State Energy Code (limited glazing, increased insulation). 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any. None. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (i.e.: traffic, equipment operation, other)? Traffic from Sunset Blvd, and 1-405. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (i.e.: traffic, equipment operation, other)? Indicate what hour's noise would come from the site? Short term: Trucks, saws, hammers and pumps from 7am to 5pm, Monday — Friday, 8am to 5pm Saturday. Long term: Passenger vehicles 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Limit noise producing construction to normal workday hours Monday through Friday and Saturday listed in b.2 above and to limit loud radio music from construction workers. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Current use of the site is a vacant single family residence. Adjacent properties are used as single family residences. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No. c. Describe any structures on the site. None. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? CA (Commercial Arterial) f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? CA (Commercial Arterial) g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not applicable. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? One to two people will work in the project. j. Approximately how many people would the complete project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Not applicable. I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and project land uses and plans, if any: Application is made for conditional use permit to comply with City of Renton Building Regulations. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle or low-income housing. No housing provided. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. One middle income housing unit to be demolished. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Not applicable. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas? What is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? Height of building is 28'-0" to mid-point of the pitched roof. Principal exterior building materials are metal panels and split- faced, concrete masonry units. b. What view in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any. Not applicable. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Light from storage building 6 a.m. to 9 p.m. and vehicles associated with the building use. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? A No. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Light from adjacent properties and vehicles. d Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Indirect exterior lighting, window shades. • 12. Recreation a What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? None. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Not applicable. A 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Not applicable. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe the proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. 1-405, Sunset Blvd., Houser, Factory Place North, North Marion Street. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? 300 yards c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? Four. How many would the project eliminate? One. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private.) No. e Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. 4 vehicle trips/day. 1 peak p.m. (4:00 — 5:00 p.m.) vehicle trips. g Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any. None. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (i.e.: fire protection, police protection, health care, and schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No, current services are adequate to support this proposal. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Not applicable. 9 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other? Cable TV b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity, which might be needed. Electricity Puget Sound Energy Water City of Renton Telephone Qwest Cable T.V. AT&T Cable Services Sewer City of Renton Natural Gas Puget Sound Energy C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declarations of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: , Name Printed: 77-b7.50N Date: g- Z Z- 0 Z I0 — 1TTAL a� IREME a°1' FOR LAND USE • APPLICATIONS i LAND USE PERMIT SUBMITTAL WAIVED MODIFIED COMMENTS: REQUIREMENTS: BY: By: {Calculations, Sur\ey I :Density;Workshee t 4 Drainage Control Plan 2 Qra g Repottx F Elevations, Architactural3ANC 4 r G acil z.r • evatii� ... R.: . Existing Covenar is(Recorded Copy), Existing Easeme its'(Recorded op } Flood Plain Map, if applicable 4 t Floor Plans 3 AND Geotechnical Report2.03 81A Gradllag Plan,`Cunceptuat 2 Grading Plan, Detailed 2 King County Ass.essor's Map Indicating Site y Landscaping Plan, Conceptual. Legal Descnpticn< List of Surround ng Property Owners, Mailing Labels f xr Property;Owners 4 Map of Existing Site Conditions Master Applicat on Form Monument Cams (one per monument) , t {91, I./ Parking, Lot.Ccverage & LandscapingAnalysis.d • Plan Reductions (PMTs)4 Postage. Preapplication vleeting Summary 4 t Public Works P pproval Letter a I Rehabilitation Plan , Se Sty Y1r This requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services Section PROJECT NAME: b_S S P-A 6 T)71k..��i 2. Public Works Plan Review Section 3. Building_Section DATE: 0(/ I /6erfi' Section Airnr Do LC n ldfvision.s\develop.sedev.plan.Ing`,waiver xis i/- J i ' REVISED 5/17/00 RUG-13-2000 08:53 CITY OF PENTON 425 430 7300 P.02 '02 WAIVER OF S MITTAL REQUIREMEN FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS LAND 11.3E PERM,17 SUBMITTAL; WAIVED MODIFIED COMMENTS: x4 F Et4UiREME k'FS: BY: BY: 2 Screening Detail 4 j Stree>:Ptafdes t Title Report or P at Certificate 4 To taphy Mal (51Cehfttrs . • Traffic Study 2 2,14 Tree CutfrrigAtegetattor� fear c Pfan a Urban Center D:sign Overlay District Report 4 >`ltltltles Plan,;GE neralizad Wetlands Delinc ation Map 4 (, Wetlands Planti lg Plan Wetlands Study riv/v Wireless: 1 Applicant Agreement Statement 2 AND g Inventory o:,Existing Sites 2 ANo 5 Lease.AgrE ement, Draft zAcvia a Map of Exi;ting Site Conditions 2 AND 3 Map of VieN Area 2ANa3 r f hotoslmu ationS 2 AND 3 This requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services Section PROJECT NAME: ST'QgA- 2. Public Works Plan Review Section 3. Building Sel;tion DATE: g/1 G/ 4. Developme it Planning Section t .division_sldeve!op.ser',dev.plan.mg‘waiver.xls GFVICFn /17lnO1 TOTAL P.02 1102-19TH AVE.EAST•SEATTLE,WA 98112.322-1192•FAX:322-5161 22 March, 2002 Lesley Nishihira, Associate Planner Planning/Building/Public Works City of Renton 1005 South Grady Way Sixth Floor Renton, WA 98055 RE:Joos Storage Building/Justification For Conditional Use 1532 North Marion Street Pre-app. No: 00-61 Dear Ms. Nishihira: I am writing a justification with supporting details for the Conditional Use Application for the above referenced project. There are several reasons in favor of an approval for the application. First,the proposal meets the Comprehensive Plan policy LU-181 where"development should be designed to be compatible with adjacent, less intensive uses...". The proposed storage building is compatible with the adjacent, less intensive existing single family residences. The proposed structure height is 28'and single- family structures are allowed 30' in height. The proposed use is also compatible with the adjacent, more intensive future use of the CA Zone that allows 50' of structure height. The proposed 1'-0"structure setback from the west property line(0'-0"is allowed)will provide a landscape trellis buffer from the adjacent single family residence. No lighting from the proposed structure will project onto the adjacent properties. The proposed self-storage warehouse provides a need in the community. There are no self-storage facilities for the public on the adjacent blocks that are zoned CA. A search on the web for"warehouses— merchandise and self-storage"and"storage-household"found two businesses approximately 1 1/2 miles east on NE 4th Street. Several similar businesses are located at least two miles away from the subject site to the southwest. The proposed location of the self-storage building serves the nearby residential area to the west and the business areas to the east. The self-storage building can also act as a buffer between the quieter residential area and the high traffic along Sunset Blvd. NE. Traffic generated by the building tenants should not have a significant impact on the adjacent properties. If you have any questions regarding this letter or if there is any additional information you require, you are welcome to call (206) 322-1192 or e-mail me neal@rhnewellaia.com. Sincerely, DEVELOP°A,:t. —14 CITY OF RENTON Neal Thompson Roger H. Newell,AIA RECEIVED 1102-19TH AVE.EAST•SEATTLE,WA 98112 322-1192•FAX:322-5161 22 March, 2002 Lesley Nishihira,Associate Planner Planning/Building/Public Works City of Renton 1005 South Grady Way Sixth Floor Renton,WA 98055 RE: Joos Storage Building/Project Narrative 1532 North Marion Street Pre-app. No: 00-61 Dear Ms. Nishihira: The Joos Storage Building is on a 10,145 SF site located at 1532 Marion Street, due South of the Paccar Kenworth truck plant and West of 1-405 and Sunset Blvd NE. The site, as well as the immediately surrounding property, is zoned CA(Commercial Arterial). R-8 property is to the Southwest across Factory Place North, and West of Factory Avenue North. The Paccar plant to the North is zoned IH. A vacant single-family residence currently occupies the site. There are no special features(wetlands,water bodies, and steep slopes)to the flat site. The general soil condition of the site as described in Geotech Consultants 11-16-00 geotechnical study consists of 15' of medium-dense sand and silty sand overlying 15'of soft, moderately compressible silt, silty sand and peat. Roof and surface drains will be kept separate from the foundation drain system and will be connected to the drainage control system per plans. The proposed use of the property is a 10,114 SF storage warehouse. The warehouse covers 75%of the lot area and is set back 10'from the front property line. The street and alley adjacent to the site are fully developed. Street improvements will be limited to a new curb cut and replacement of any damaged existing sidewalk. A new fire hydrant will be added to the existing 12"water main in Houser Way and located 146'from the site per the Utility/Drainage Plan. An estimate of the total construction cost for the proposed project is roughly$405,000. Approximately 479 cubic yards of excavation and no fill is anticipated. One significant (>6"caliper)cedar tree is to be removed. No land is to be dedicated to City of Renton for this project. There will be a temporary job shack on site during construction of the storage building. Sincerely, DEVE O i NL;;'ulviiJG ( CITYITY OFF RENTON Neal Thompson Roger H. Newell,AIA REL. i _ . DEVELOPMENT P CCTV OF'RENTON CITY OFRENTOJ1"� i0 RFr- JAN 17 .002 MA'S ? R(loi. - -:-. RUILDINta MEMORANDUM DATE: 5// DI©O \ A TO: Construction Services, Fire Prevention, Plan Review, Project Planner FROM: Jana Hanson, Development Services Division Director SUBJECT:' New Preliminary Application: j OS S7V RAz E 1)1 Ld)J N6 LOCATION: 15 2- j`I M kRl D N j PREAPP NO. O`D - P A meeting with the applicant has been scheduled for %1 '• 00 , Thursday, T)U N E. , in one of the 6th floor conference rooms (new City Hall). If this meeting is scheduled at 10:00 AM, the MEETING MUST BE CONCLUDED PRIOR TO 11:00 AM to allow time to prepare for the 11:00 AM meeting. Please review the attached project plans prior to the scheduled meeting with the applicant. You will not need to do a thorough "permit level" review at this time. Note only major issues that must be resolved prior to formal land use and/or building permit application submittal. Please submit your written comments to at least two (2) days before the meeting. Thank you. / 7 U LieI' i j 47 Svc / / a r i IS 1 � ��� P OCc C?aVI c-/ S t-ar2 j e. Y at,-ok, re�j cc. - ( b (/e✓! Ti (0() 6v1 Preapp2 �7 • aiR + CITY OF RENTON '"Pi, �lv�o� FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU MEMORANDUM DATE: May 15, 2000 TO: Lesley Nishihira, Planner FROM: Jim Gray, Assistant Fire Marshal 4 () SUBJECT: Joos Storage Building, 1532 N Marion St. Fire Department Comments: 1. The preliminary Fire flow is 4500 GPM which requires one fire hydrant within 150 feet of the building and four additional hydrants within 300 feet of the building. 2. Provide a list of any flammable, combustible liquids or hazardous chemicals that are to be used or stored on site. 3. A fire mitigation fee of$3,940.56 is required based on $.52 a square foot of the building square footage. Please feel free to contact me it you have any questions. CITY OF RENTON MEMO • UTILITY PLAN REVIEW TO: Lesley Nishihira FROM: Jan Illian DATE: May 26, 2000 SUBJECT: PREAPPLICATON REVIEW COMMENTS PREAPP NO. 00-61 JOOS STORAGE 1532 — N. Marion Street NOTE ON PRELIMINARY REVIEW COMMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS REPORT: The following comments on development and permitting issues are based on the pre- application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision makers (e.g. Hearing Examiner, Boards of Adjustment, Board of Public Works and City Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by the City or made by the applicant. WATER 1. There is an existing 6-inch water main that fronts the property on N. Marion Street. There is an 8-inch water main on Factory Place and a 12-inch water main on Houser Way. Depending on fire flow demand requirements for the building, the current fire flow available may not be adequate. 2. Extension of a water main to serve the site and installation of additional fire hydrants may be required. 3. There are fire hydrants in the vicinity that may be counted towards the fire protection of this project, but are subject to verification for being within 300 feet of the nearest corner of the building. 4. The proposed project is located in the 196-water pressure zone and is within Aquifer Protection Zone I. 5. A Water System Development Charge (SDC) of $0.113 per square foot of gross site area will be apply. If there is currently water service to the parcel, a redevelopment credit may apply. SANITARY SEWER 1. There is an existing 8-inch sewer main in the ally adjacent to the west side of the property. Due to the shallow depth of the main, documentation will be required to show that gravity service to the building can be provided. Joos Storage page 2 2. A sewer main extension will not be required. 3. A Sanitary Sewer System Development Charge (SDC) of $0.078 per square foot of gross site area will be apply. If the parcel is currently being sewered, a redevelopment credit may apply. 4. If floor drains are required by the building department, they will be required to be connected to the sanitary sewer system. An oil/ water separator may be required to be installed. SURFACE WATER 1. There is no storm drainage on N. Marion. There are storm drainage facilities on Factory Place N. and Houser Way. 2. A storm drainage plan and drainage report is required. See attached Drafting Standards for requirements. Water quality treatment sized for the new impervious surfaces subject to vehicular access may be required. 3. The Surface Water SDC is assessed based on the total new impervious surface square footage as reflected in the final design. The charge is determined by multiplying the gross square footage by $0.129. TRANSPORTATION 1. The traffic mitigation fee of $75 per additional generated daily trip shall be assessed as determined by from the ITE trip generation manual. GENERAL COMMENTS 1. Cut and capping of utilities to existing structures on site will be required as part of the demolition permit. 2. A Right of Way permit will be required for cub cut and driveway improvements in the right of way. 3. A separate utility construction permit may be required, depending on the extent of utility improvements. CC: Neil Watts CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works MEMORANDUM DATE: June 15, 2000 TO: Pre-Application File No. 00-61 FROM: Lesley Nishihira, Associate Planner, x7270 SUBJECT: Joos Storage Building General: We have completed a preliminary review of the pre-application for the above-referenced development proposal. The following comments on development and permitting issues are based on the pre-application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant and the codes in effect on the date of review. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision-makers (e.g., Hearing Examiner, Zoning Administrator, Board of Adjustment, Board of Public Works, and City Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by City staff or made by the applicant. The applicant is encouraged to review all applicable sections of the Renton Municipal Code. The Development Regulations are available for purchase for$50, plus tax, from the Finance Division on the first floor of City Hall. Project Proposal: The subject site is addressed as 1532 North Marion Street. The property is currently developed with a single family residence and detached garage. The project would include the construction of a 7,578 square foot building intended for self-service storage use. In addition, a new driveway and 10 feet of landscaping along the site's street frontage are proposed. Zoning: The subject site is designated Commercial Arterial (CA)on the City's Zoning Map. The CA zone allows self-service storage as a secondary use and only with approval of a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use permit. In addition, the use is limited to one building and one story in the CA zone. Development Standards: The proposal's compliance with the CA zone development standards and the parking regulations is addressed below: Lot Coverage - The CA zone allows building coverage at a maximum of 65% of the lot area for projects not providing structured parking, or 75% if parking is provided within the building. The proposed structure would arrive at building lot coverage of approximately 75% and is proposed to include parking within the structure. Setbacks/Landscaping—The CA zone requires a minimum landscaped setback of 10 feet from all street frontages. No other landscaped setbacks are required in the zone. The proposal appears to satisfy the required street frontage landscaped setback. At the time of formal application submittal, a detailed landscape plan indicating the location, sizes, and types of the proposed plantings will be required. Height—The CA zone allows a maximum building height of 50 feet. The building is also limited to one-story due to its location in the CA zone. The proposal appears to comply with both of these requirements. Screening—Outdoor storage areas, if any, must be screened from adjacent or abutting properties and public rights-of-way. Screening must also be provided for all surface-mounted and roof top utility and mechanical equipment. In addition, garbage dumpsters and recyclable areas must be screened pursuant to RMC section 4-4-09007. Approval of the proposed locations of dumpster areas by Rainier Waste Management is recommended prior to the submittal of the formal land use application. The site plan application will need to include elevations and details on the proposed methods of screening. Pre00-6I\ Pedestrian Connection —All development in the CA zone is required to provide a direct and clear pedestrian connection from sidewalks to building entrances. The site plan would need to be revised to include a connection from the existing sidewalk along North Marion Street to the entrance of the building. Parking—The parking regulations require a specific number of off-street parking stalls based on the amount of square footage dedicated to certain uses. For the proposed self-service storage building, one parking space is required for every 3,500 square feet of gross floor area. Based on the size of the proposed building, approximately 2 parking spaces would be required on-site. The proposal includes 5 spaces, which exceeds the amount permitted by code. Therefore, in order to provide parking over the maximum number of spaces permitted, approval of a parking modification request would be necessary. In addition, it is not clear how the use of the building as self-service storage would operate and how the parking area would be affected (e,g., code access for garage doors, floor plan to ensure 24-foot aisle width is maintained, etc.). The-applicant is recommended to consult with City staff prior to finalizing the design of the proposal_ The parking regulations specify standard stall dimensions of 9' x 20' and compact dimensions dt 81/2' x 16' Please note, the site plan submitted incorrectly indicates a stall length of 16 feet where 20 feet is measured. An aisle width of 24 feet is required for 90 degree parking stalls. ADA accessible stalls must be a minimum of 8 feet in width by 20 feet in length,with an adjacent access aisle of 8 feet in width for van accessible spaces. The proposal appears to comply with the parking regulation requirements for stall and aisle width dimensions as well as for ADA accessible stalls. However, a floor plan would be necessary in order to verify the required 24-foot aisle width is maintained for the parking area. Signage: Only one freestanding business sign (pole, monument/ground, projecting or roof) is permitted per street frontage for each individual parcel. Each sign shall not exceed an area greater than one and one-half square feet for each lineal foot of property frontage that is occupied by the business. In no case shall the sign exceed a total of 300 square feet(150 square feet per face if a two face sign). In addition to the permitted freestanding sign, wall signs with a copy area not exceeding 20°/0 of the façade to which it is applied is also permitted. Permit Requirements: The proposal would require approval of a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use permit as well as Environmental (SEPA) Review. The review process would require a public hearing and would be completed in an estimated time frame of 8 to 12 weeks once a complete application is accepted. The application fee would be $2,500, plus $.33 per mailing label required for notification to all property owners within 300 feet of the site. Please refer to the attached application package for a complete list of the submittal requirements. If the applicant seeks a parking modification, the formal application would need to include an additional write-up providing justification for the specified criteria. The modification request would be processed administratively and would occur concurrently with the review of the land use application. In addition to the required land use permits, separate building, construction and sign permits would be required. The review of these permits may occur concurrently with the review of the land use permits, but can not be issued prior to the completion of any required appeal periods. Conditional Use Criteria: In order to obtain approval of a conditional use, the proposal must satisfy specific criteria. The purpose of a conditional use permit is to allow certain uses in districts from which they are normally prohibited. The evaluation of the proposed use must be deemed consistent with other existing and potential uses within the general area of the site. It is the applicant's responsibility to adequately demonstrate the facts justifying the approval of the conditional use permit based on the use's compatibility with ALL of the following criteria (RMC section 4-9-030G): • Comprehensive Plan • Community Need • Effect on Adjacent Properties, including lot coverage yards and height • Compatibility • Parking Pre00-61\ • Traffic • Noise, Glare • Landscaping • Accessory Uses • Conversion • Public Improvements Staff would likely take the existing residential uses located adjacent to the subject site into consideration when evaluating the conditional use criteria. It is important to note that staff is only able to make a recommendation and that the Hearing Examiner is the final decision-maker for this conditional use permit. However, it is likely that staff would recommend approval, provided adequate measures are taken to reduce impacts to the adjacent residences. Fees: In addition to the applicable land use, building, construction and sign permit fees, the following mitigation fees may be required prior to the issuance of building permits: • A Transportation Mitigation Fee based on $75 per each new average daily trip attributable to the project; and • A Fire Mitigation Fee based on $0.52 per square foot of new construction. A handout listing all of the City's Development related fees is attached for your review. cc: Jennifer Henning Pre00-61\ kvoi STAATE ?y�'.;u.: MEMORANDUM F(rAl"'G�� DATE: S 1l 0/00 TO: Long Range Planning FROM: Jana Hanson, Development Services Division Director SUBJECT: New Preliminary Application: O p b G S 7'D F2 13vi W / N6 LOCATION: MAP-) 1 PREAPPNO. — � I { Please review the attached preliminary project plans for consistency with applicable Comprehensive Plan Policies. Please s bmit your written comments to I t- L � no later than it/ 13'F"" . Thank you. We will not be able to include comments received after this date in the presentation/summary we prepare for the applicant. '7 I.5 10&31 -( Lc�rru7 /11'Z' 79 - c, rtc-12c ! /\L I v‘J TIC -tTh rv5 vL p(_✓g-1v po a c.. L u - t u - o c z a i -c .rb tJ 5 Cl o f- i H C car irzc-1-10vS t v c` j'LA-ry YI-C r3 t P U n_CI f 47NvLlv-r$ 5 H o v t-2 53 t= 0 C3 1 c,ry -7 a L 'Y—r1r3L W1rN /1-0 F1L+ TLls3S rvTcCTrftvi; (/SLS , € .L�, L1c.1i71r'.J F1 )`rce`3 , 5i.7r3r\-cr�5 51-)0u t_o F-ti_ (36 Cc (%1s)r3 Po RA 5I DL3)4ry , I (-1Z. 517 6- 1 A 5 5 t rV L.1 F7Thrn IL Y V L. S U ry 1713Z S i t7 C . `1 3 T H( E7\S , ( F C t 5 r\63 O v i ' t-t2o rt, T 1 1 C:. F'12 0 PLF72-r i" 'yti L3 E 11g 7 r`IC-r1 su 1205 W I to 63,G i Fl K o\-1 O t c.1 J 1-ru() C U N 5 i;(Z v C-T I U T✓ b Sire To 1,'"I ir'tl z,LIT I v ('flt 7 ; To I t67- fi p- No o nc31---1 c Y t s5t. 7E�tc PLviivrvi GE O T E C 13256 Northeast 20th Street,Suite 16 DEVELOPMENT Bellevue,Washington 98005 CONSULTANTS, INC- ELOPMCITy Epien�1 L(425) 747-5618 FAX (425)747-8561 BAN 1 7 „ November 16, 2000 JN 00363 Dr. Paul Joos • If 13510 Southeast 50th Place Bellevue, Washington 98006 Subject: Transmittal Letter— Geotechnical Engineering Study Proposed Self-Storage Building 1532 North Marion Street Renton, Washington Dear Dr. Joos: We are pleased to present this geotechnical engineering report for the proposed self-storage building to be constructed in Renton, Washington. The scope of our work consisted of exploring site surface and subsurface conditions, and then developing this report to provide a liquefaction assessment, recommendations for general earthwork, and design criteria for foundations and retaining walls. This work was authorized by your acceptance of our proposal, P-5341, dated September 12, 2000. The subsurface conditions of the proposed building site were explored with two test borings that encountered approximately 15 feet of medium-dense sand and silty sand overlying 15 feet of soft, moderately compressible silt, silty sand and peat. The underlying soils will undergo long-term consolidation. If differential settlement and noticeable cosmetic cracking are acceptable, the proposed building may be supported on heavily reinforced conventional foundations bearing on a minimum of 2 feet of structural fill. Perimeter and interior wall footings should be continuous. The attached report contains a discussion of the study and our recommendations. Please contact us if there are any questions regarding this report, or if we can be of further assistance during the design and construction phases of this project. Respectfully submitted, GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Jeffrey M. Johnson Geotechnical Engineer cc: Roger Newell Architects — Neal Thompson Via facsimile: (206) 322-5161 JMJ/MRM: alt GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, fNC. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Proposed Self-Storage Building 1532 North Marion Street Renton, Washington This report presents the findings and recommendations of our geotechnical engineering study for the site of the proposed self-storage building in Renton, Washington. The Vicinity Map, Plate 1, illustrates the general location of the site. Development of the property is in the planning stage, and detailed plans were not made available to us. We understand that the existing residence will be demolished. We anticipate that the new building will be a tall metal structure having an internal mezzanine level. The building will extend within 12 to 18 inches of the property lines. Cuts below existing grades are anticipated to be less than 2 feet. SITE CONDITIONS SURFACE The rectangular site has approximately 80 feet of frontage along North Marion Street and a depth of approximately 125 feet. The relatively flat site is currently developed with a one-story, single- family residence on the western portion of the lot and a one-story garage along the northern alley. Yard areas are covered with grass and occasional small to medium deciduous trees and medium to large conifers. Adjacent properties to the east and west are developed with one-story, single-family residences. North of the site is a two-story, concrete tilt-up building and to the south is a metal shop building. All of the nearby structures appear to have a finished floor elevation near the existing grade. SUBSURFACE The subsurface conditions were explored by excavating drilling two test borings at the approximate locations shown on the Site Exploration Plan, Plate 2. Our exploration program was based on the proposed construction, anticipated subsurface conditions and those encountered during exploration, and the scope of work outlined in our proposal. The borings were drilled on September 25, 2000, using a track-mounted, hollow-stem auger drill. Samples were taken at 5-foot intervals with a standard penetration sampler. This split-spoon sampler, which has a 2-inch outside diameter, is driven into the soil with a 140-pound hammer falling 30 inches. The number of blows required to advance the sampler a given distance is an indication of the soil density or consistency. A geotechnical engineer from our staff observed the drilling process, logged the test borings, and obtained representative samples of the soil encountered. The Test Boring Logs are attached as Plates 3 and 4. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Dr. Paul Joos JN 00363 November 16, 2000 Page 2 Soil Conditions The two test borings were relatively consistent, encountering alluvial deposits consisting of approximately 15 feet of medium-dense sand and silty sand overlying approximately 10 feet of relatively soft silt and loose, fine-grained, silty sand. Below this, at a depth of approximately 25 feet, we encountered 3 to 7 feet of moderately compressible peat overlying medium-dense to dense sand and silty sand to the maximum explored depth of 41.5 feet. Groundwater Conditions Groundwater seepage was observed at a depth of 10 feet in both borings. The test borings were left open for only a short time period. Therefore, the seepage levels on the logs represent the location of transient water seepage and may not indicate the static groundwater level. It should be noted that groundwater levels vary seasonally with rainfall and other factors. Since the test borings were drilled during the driest part of the year, we anticipate that groundwater levels could be higher during the wetter winter months. The final logs represent our interpretations of the field logs and laboratory tests. The stratification lines on the logs represent the approximate boundaries between soil types at the exploration locations. The actual transition between soil types may be gradual, and subsurface conditions can vary between exploration locations. The logs provide specific subsurface information only at the locations tested. If a transition in soil type occurred between samples in the borings, the depth of the transition was interpreted. The relative densities and moisture descriptions indicated on the test boring logs are interpretive descriptions based on the conditions observed during excavation drilling. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS GENERAL The test borings conducted for this study encountered approximately 15 feet of medium-dense sand and silty sand overlying 15 feet of soft, moderately compressible silt, silty sand and peat. The underlying soils will undergo long-term consolidation under the weight of new foundations, the weight of the soils themselves, and groundwater fluctuations. Structures supported on conventional foundations in the area have experienced differential foundation settlement, and the same should be anticipated for the proposed building. It is our opinion that the proposed building may be constructed on a heavily reinforced conventional foundation underlain by 2 feet of imported structural fill, if future noticeable foundation settlement is acceptable. We anticipate that this settlement will be primarily a cosmetic concern, and not structural. We recommend that the perimeter and interior wall footings be designed as a continuous, heavily reinforced footing capable of spanning 10 feet without soil support. These foundations would be similar to grade beams to provide more uniform settlement across the structure. The continuous, heavily reinforced footing should also prevent a catastrophic foundation failure in the event of liquefaction during a moderate to large seismic event. The only way to prevent settlement under the foundations is to support them on deep foundations. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Dr. Paul Joos JN 00363 November 16, 2000 Page 3 Due to the close proximity of the building footings to the property line, we anticipate that an approximate 3.5-foot cut will be necessary to place 2 feet of structural fill below a footing with an 18-inch embedment. In order to limit the potential for sloughing on the adjoining property, the overexcavation and placement of 2 feet of structural fill should occur in sections no longer than approximately 15 feet. This reduces the time that the cut will remain unsupported. Sufficient structural fill should be stockpiled at the site to immediately backfill an overexcavation. Settlement-tolerant construction should be used for the building. Wood or steel framing is recommended. Brittle building materials, such as masonry, tile, and stucco, should be avoided. In order to reduce the potential problems associated with differential settlement of the building and the surrounding ground, we recommend the following. • All in-ground utilities should be designed to tolerate settlement of the building. Utilities that require gravity for flow, su.ch as storm and sanitary sewer, should be designed with a higher rate of fall leaving the building. This will allow continued function of the utility during and after settlement of the building. • Construct all entrance walkways as reinforced slabs that are doweled into the grade beam at the door thresholds. This will allow the walkways to "ramp down" with the building as it settles, without causing a downset at the threshold. • Isolate all other on-grade elements, such as slab-on-grade floors or pavements, from the foundations and columns to allow differential movement. The structural fill placed beneath the structure should consist of an imported, gravelly pit-run or a crushed material. These fill materials are more readily compactible, reducing the potential for strong ground vibrations during the compaction process. We recommend that the contractor submit a sample of the proposed structural fill for approval by the geotechnical engineer prior to importing the fill. The contractor should be cautioned to use techniques that minimize ground vibrations, in order to reduce the risk of causing settlement in adjacent structures. Large pieces of concrete resulting from the house demolition should be broken up offsite. Large vibratory rollers should be avoided for use in compacting structural fill. Compactors such as walk-behind rollers, hoe-packs, or jumping jacks would be more appropriate. As with any development in areas underlain by loose soils, there is a risk of causing small amounts of settlement in adjacent structures. In order to protect against unsubstantiated damage claims, we recommend that benchmarks be installed on surrounding structures, then be surveyed to determine if settlement does occur. The erosion control measures needed during the site development will depend heavily on the weather conditions that are encountered. While site clearing will expose bare soil, the erosion potential on the site is low due to the relatively flat grades of the site. We anticipate that a silt fence will be needed around the downslope side of any cleared .areas. Rocked construction access roads should be extended into the site to reduce the amount of mud carried off the property by trucks and equipment. Following rough grading, it may be necessary to mulch or hydroseed bare areas that will not be immediately covered with landscaping or an impervious surface. Geotech Consultants, Inc. should be allowed to review the final development plans to verify that the recommendations presented in this report are adequately addressed in the design. Such a plan review would be additional work beyond the current scope of work for this study, and it may include GEOTECH CONSULTANTS INC. Dr. Paul Joos JN 00363 November 16, 2000 Page 4 revisions to our recommendations to accommodate site, development, and geotechnical constraints that become more evident during the review process. We recommend including this report, in its entirety, in the project contract documents. This report should also be provided to any future property owners so they will be aware of our findings and recommendations. SEISMIC CONSIDERATIONS The site is located within Seismic Zone 3, as illustrated on Figure No. 16-2 of the 1997 Uniform Building Code (UBC). In accordance with Table 16-J of the 1997 UBC, the site soil profile within 100 feet of the ground surface is best represented by Soil Profile Type SE (Soft Soil). Liquefaction The loose, alluvial soil beneath the water table has a moderate potential for liquefaction during a large earthquake. Current geotechnical analysis cannot accurately predict where and to what extent soil liquefaction will occur during a large earthquake. It is therefore prudent to assume that soil liquefaction could occur beneath the site. The study of liquefaction and its resulting effects is on-going, as development in areas underlain by saturated alluvium or hydraulic fill has only really occurred to a great extent in the last 20 to 30 years. Recent observations from earthquakes occurring in the State of California and in Japan indicate the following information about structures in areas underlain by liquefiable soil: • Ground surface subsidence due to liquefaction tends to occur either over a large area or at concentrated points where sand boils occur. • Differential foundation settlement typically occurs either at the location of a sand boil or where the subsurface soil conditions change significantly. • Catastrophic foundation settlement due to liquefaction occurs primarily as a result of lateral spreading, particularly in waterfront areas. • Conventionally constructed commercial buildings have not been documented to exhibit a high percentage of catastrophic foundation failures in liquefiable areas. Due to the uncertainties in predicting the potential effects of seismic liquefaction on commercial structures in loose, alluvial soils, we recommend that all foundations be supported on at least 2 feet of structural fill and that perimeter foundations be continuous. This will allow the exterior footings to span across any areas of concentrated liquefaction. Additionally, we recommend that buildings be designed for a Type SE soil profile, which results in the largest total design base shear. Considering the recommendations presented in this geotechnical report, it is our professional opinion that the differential foundation settlement that could be experienced by the structure during a large earthquake should be on the order of 3 to 4 inches in a distance of 100 feet. This amount of differential settlement should be tolerable for a commercial structure. It is our opinion that no additional r.F(lTFr u rnniciII TANTC I,lr Dr. Paul Joos JN 00363 November 16, 2000 Page 5 liquefaction mitigation measures need to be incorporated into the structure beyond what are recommended in this geotechnical report. By preventing catastrophic settlement of the foundations, the safety of the occupants should be protected. This conforms with the intent of Section 1626.1 of the 1997 UBC, which requires that the design "safeguards against major structural failures and loss of life." The intent is not to prevent damage or ensure continued function of the structure after the design seismic event. CONVENTIONAL FOUNDATIONS The proposed structure can be supported on conventional continuous bearing on at least 2 feet of structural fill placed over native soil. All perimeter and wall bearing interior footings should be supported on continuous, heavily-reinforced footings. These footings should be designed to span a minimum of 10 feet without soil support. See the section entitled GENERAL EARTHWORK AND STRUCTURAL FILL for recommendations regarding the placement and compaction of structural fill beneath structures. Adequate compaction of structural fill should be verified with frequent density testing during fill placement. Prior to placing structural fill beneath foundations, the excavation should be observed by the geotechnical engineer to document that adequate bearing soils have been exposed. We recommend that continuous and individual spread footings have minimum widths of 16 and 24 inches, respectively. Footings should also be bottomed at least 18 inches below the lowest adjacent finish ground surface. The local building codes should be reviewed to determine if different footing widths or embedment depths are required. Depending on the final site grades, overexcavation may be required below the footings to expose competent, native soil or provide 2 feet of structural fill beneath the footings. The overexcavation must be at least as wide at the bottom as the sum of the depth of the overexcavation and the footing width. For example, an overexcavation extending 2 feet below the bottom of a 2-foot-wide footing must be at least 4 feet wide at the base of the excavation. For the above design criteria, it is anticipated that the total post-construction settlement of footings founded on competent, native soil, or on structural fill up to 5 feet in thickness, will be about 2 to 3 inches, with differential settlements on the order of 1 to 2 inches in a distance of 50 feet along a continuous footing with a uniform load. This settlement will result from consolidation of the underlying soils under static building loads. Lateral loads due to wind or seismic forces may be resisted by friction between the foundation and the bearing soil, or by passive earth pressure acting on the vertical, embedded portions of the foundation. For the latter condition, the foundation must be either poured directly against relatively level, undisturbed soil or be surrounded by level structural fill. We recommend using the following ultimate values for the foundation's resistance to lateral loading: PARAMETER ULTIMATE VALUE: Coefficient of Friction 0.45 Passive Earth Pressure 300 pcf • GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Dr. Paul Joos JN 00363 November 16, 2000 Page 6 ra4 Where:(I)pcf is pounds per cubic foot,and(ii) passive earth pressure is computed using the equivalent fluid density. We recommend maintaining a safety factor of at least 1.5 for the foundation's resistance to lateral loading, when using the above ultimate values. PERMANENT FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS No tall retaining walls are anticipated for this project. However, walls backfilled on only one side should be designed to resist the lateral earth pressures imposed by the soil they retain. The following recommended parameters are for walls that restrain level backfill: PARAMETER VALUE Active Earth Pressure* 35 pcf Passive Earth Pressure 300 pcf Coefficient of Friction 0.45 Soil Unit Weight 130 pcf Where:(i)pcf is pounds per cubic foot,and(il)active and passive earth pressures are computed using the equivalent fluid pressures. For a restrained wall that cannot deflect at least 0.002 times its height,a uniform lateral pressure equal to 10 psf times the height of the wall should be added to the above active equivalent fluid pressure. The values given above are to be used to design permanent foundation and retaining walls only. The values for friction and passive resistance are ultimate values and do not include a safety factor. We recommend a safety factor of at least 1.5 for overturning and sliding, when using the above values to design the walls. Restrained wall soil parameters should be utilized for a distance of 1.5 times the wall height from corners in the walls. The design values given above do not include the effects of any hydrostatic pressures behind the walls and assume that no surcharges, such as those caused by slopes, vehicles, or adjacent foundations will be exerted on the walls. If these conditions exist, those pressures should be added to the above lateral soil pressures. Where sloping backfill is desired behind the walls, we will need to be given the wall dimensions and the slope of the backfill in order to provide the appropriate design earth pressures. The surcharge due to traffic loads behind a wall can typically be accounted for by adding a uniform pressure equal to 2 feet multiplied by the above active fluid density. Heavy construction equipment should not be operated behind retaining and foundation walls within a distance equal to the height of a wall, unless the walls are designed for the additional lateral pressures resulting from the equipment. The wall design criteria assume that the backfill will be well-compacted in lifts no thicker than 12 inches. The compaction of backfill near the walls should be accomplished with hand-operated equipment to prevent the walls from being overloaded by the higher soil forces that occur during compaction. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. • Dr. Paul Jobs JN 00363 November 16, 2000 Page 7 Retaining Wall Backfill Backfill placed behind retaining or foundation walls should be coarse, free-draining structural fill containing no organics. This backfill should contain no more than 5 percent silt or clay particles and have no gravel greater than 4 inches in diameter. The percentage of particles passing the No. 4 sieve should generally be between 25 and 70 percent. The purpose of these backfill requirements is to ensure that the design criteria for a retaining wall are not exceeded because of a build-up of hydrostatic pressure behind the wall. The top 12 to 18 inches of the backfill should consist of a compacted, relatively impermeable soil or topsoil, or the surface should be paved. The ground surface must also slope away from backfilled walls to reduce the potential for surface water to percolate into the backfill. The section entitled GENERAL EARTHWORK AND STRUCTURAL FILL contains recommendations regarding the placement and compaction of structural fill behind retaining and foundation walls. The performance of subsurface drainage systems will degrade over time. Therefore, waterproofing should be provided where moist conditions or some seepage through the walls are not acceptable in the future, This typically includes limiting cold-joints and wall penetrations, and using bentonite panels or membranes on the outside of the walls. Applying a thin coat of asphalt emulsion is not considered waterproofing, but will only help to prevent moisture, generated from water vapor or capillary action, from seeping through the concrete. SLABS-ON-GRADE The building floors may be constructed as slabs-on-grade atop one foot of imported structural fill placed above the existing non-organic soils. The subgrade soil must be in a firm, non-yielding condition at the time of slab construction or underslab fill placement. Any soft areas encountered should be excavated and replaced with select, imported structural fill. All slabs-on-grade should be underlain by a capillary break or drainage layer consisting of a minimum 4-inch thickness of coarse, free-draining structural fill with a gradation similar to that discussed in PERMANENT FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS. As noted by the American Concrete Institute (ACI) in Section 3.2.3 of the Guides for Concrete Floor and Slab Structures, proper moisture protection is desirable immediately below any on-grade slab that will be covered by tile, wood, carpet, impermeable floor coverings, or any moisture-sensitive equipment or products. ACI also notes that vapor retarders, such as 6-mil visqueen, are typically used. A vapor retarder is defined as a material with a permeance of less than 0.3 US perms per square foot (psf) per hour, as determined by ASTM E 96. It is possible that concrete admixtures may meet this specification, although the manufacturers of the admixtures should be consulted. However, if no potential for vapor passage through the slab is desired, a vapor barrier should be used. A vapor barrier, as defined by ACI, is a product with a water transmission rate of 0.00 perms per square foot per hour when tested in accordance with ASTM E 96. Reinforced membranes having sealed overlaps can meet this requirement. Additionally, ACI (Section 4.1.5) recommends that a minimum of 4 inches of compactible granular fill, such as crushed rock, should be placed over the vapor retarder or barrier for protection. Sand is not recommended by ACI for use as the protection layer. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Dr. Paul Joos JN 00363 November 16, 2000 Page 8 We recommend placing concrete slabs over at least 1 foot of structural fill to provide more uniform support and placing steel reinforcing bars in the slab. Typically, No. 4 rebar running both directions is sufficient. Isolation joints should be provided where the slabs intersect columns and walls. Control and expansion joints should also be used to control cracking from expansion and contraction. Saw cuts or preformed strip joints used to control shrinkage cracking should extend • through the upper one-fourth of the slab. The spacing of control or expansion joints depends on the slab shape and the amount of steel placed in it. Reducing the water-to-cement ratio of the concrete and curing the concrete, by preventing the evaporation of free water until cement hydration occurs, will also reduce shrinkage cracking. We recommend proof-rolling slab areas with a heavy truck or a large piece of construction equipment prior to slab construction. Any soft areas encountered during proof-rolling should be excavated and replaced with select, imported structural fill. EXCAVATIONS AND SLOPES Excavation slopes should not exceed the limits specified in local, state, and national government safety regulations. Temporary cuts to a depth of about 4 feet may be attempted vertically in unsaturated soil, if there are no indications of slope instability. Generally, vertical cuts should not be made near property boundaries, or existing utilities and structures. The GENERAL section should be reviewed for considerations related to temporary cuts for foundations adjacent to property lines. Based upon Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 296, Part N, the upper 8 feet of soil at the subject site would generally be classified as Type B. Therefore, temporary cut slopes in unsaturated soils greater than 4 feet in height cannot be excavated at an inclination steeper than 1:1 (Horizontal:Vertical), extending continuously between the top and the bottom of a cut. Excavation cuts greater than 8 feet or in saturated soils should be shored. Shoring will also be needed for excavations extending below a 2:1 (H:V) zone sloping down from the foundations of adjacent structures. The above-recommended temporary slope inclination is based on what has been successful at other sites with similar soil conditions. Temporary cuts are those that will remain unsupported for a relatively short duration to allow for the construction of foundations, retaining walls, or utilities. Temporary cut slopes should be protected with plastic sheeting during wet weather. The cut slopes should also be backfilled or retained as soon as possible to reduce the potential for instability. Please note that sand and loose soil can cave suddenly and without warning. Excavation, foundation, and utility contractors should be made especially aware of this potential danger. DRAINAGE CONSIDERATIONS Foundation drains should be used where (1) crawl spaces or basements will be below a structure, (2) a slab is below the outside grade, or (3) the outside grade does not slope downward from a building. Drains should also be placed at the base of all earth-retaining walls. These drains should be surrounded by at least 6 inches of 1-inch-minus, washed rock and then wrapped in non-woven, geotextile filter fabric (Mirafi 140N, Supac 4NP, or similar material). At its highest point, a perforated pipe invert should be at least 6 inches below the bottom of a slab floor or the level of a crawl space, and it should be sloped for drainage. All roof and surface water drains must be kept separate from the foundation drain system. A typical drain detail is attached to this report as Plate GEOTECH CONSULTANTS INC Dr. Paul Joos JN 00363 November 16, 2000 Page 9 6. For the best long-term performance, perforated PVC pipe is recommended for all subsurface drains. The excavation and site should be graded so that surface water is directed off the site and away from the structure. Water should not be allowed to stand in any area where foundations, slabs, or pavements are to be constructed. Final site grading in areas adjacent to a building should slope away at least 2 percent, except where the area is paved. Surface drains should be provided where necessary to prevent ponding of water behind foundation or retaining walls. GENERAL EARTHWORK AND STRUCTURAL FILL All building and pavement areas should be stripped of surface vegetation, topsoil, organic soil, and other deleterious material. It is very important that existing foundation and foundation walls be removed before site development. The stripped or removed materials should not be mixed with any materials to be used as structural fill, but they could be used in non-structural areas, such as landscape beds. Structural fill is defined as any fill placed under a building, behind permanent retaining or foundation walls, or in other areas where the underlying soil needs to support loads. All structural fill should be placed in horizontal lifts with a moisture content at, or near, the optimum moisture content. The optimum moisture content is that moisture content that results in the greatest compacted dry density. The moisture content of fill is very important and must be closely controlled during the filling and compaction process. The allowable thickness of the fill lift will depend on the material type selected, the compaction equipment used, and the number of passes made to compact the lift. The loose lift thickness should not exceed 12 inches. We recommend testing the fill as it is placed. If the fill is not sufficiently compacted, it can be recompacted before another lift is placed. This eliminates the need to remove the fill to achieve the required compaction. The following table presents recommended relative compactions for structural fill: LOCATION OF FILL MINIMUM RELATIVE PLACEMENT COMPACTION Beneath footings, slabs 95% or walkwa s Filled slopes and behind 90% retaining walls 95% for upper 12 inches of Beneath pavements subgrade; 90% below that level Where: Minimum Relative Compaction is the ratio, expressed in percentages, of the compacted dry density to the maximum dry density, as determined In accordance with ASTM Test Designation D 1557-91 (Modified Proctor). The on-site soils will not be usable as structural fill underneath the footings. Structural fill that will be placed in wet weather should consist of a coarse, granular soil with a silt or clay content of no more than 5 percent. The percentage of particles passing the No. 200 sieve should be measured GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. • Dr. Paul Joos JN 00363 November 16, 2000 Page 10 from that portion of soil passing the three-quarter-inch sieve. The GENERAL section should be reviewed for additional structural fill considerations. LIMITATIONS The analyses, conclusions, and recommendations contained in this report are based on site conditions as they existed at the time of oul- exploration and assume that the soil and groundwater conditions encountered in the test borings are representative of subsurface conditions on the site. If the subsurface conditions encountered during construction are significantly different from those observed in our explorations, or assumed to exist in the excavations, we should be advised at once so that we can review these conditions and reconsider our recommendations where necessary. Unanticipated soil conditions are commonly encountered on construction sites and cannot be fully anticipated by merely taking soil samples in test borings. Subsurface conditions can also vary between exploration locations. Such unexpected conditions frequently require making additional expenditures to attain a properly constructed project. It is recommended that the owner consider providing a contingency fund to accommodate such potential extra costs and risks. This is a standard recommendation for all projects. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Dr. Paul Joos, and his representatives, for specific application to this project and site. Our recommendations and conclusions are based on observed site materials, and selective laboratory testing and engineering analyses. Our conclusions and recommendations are professional opinions derived in accordance with current standards of practice within the scope of our services and within budget and time constraints. No warranty is expressed or implied. The scope of our services does not include services related to construction safety precautions, and our recommendations are not intended to direct the contractor's methods, techniques, sequences, or procedures, except as specifically described in our report for consideration in design. ADDITIONAL SERVICES In addition to reviewing the final plans, Geotech Consultants, Inc. should be retained to provide geotechnical consultation, testing, and observation services during construction. This is to confirm that subsurface conditions are consistent with those indicated by our exploration, to evaluate whether earthwork and foundation construction activities comply with the general intent of the recommendations presented in this report, and to provide suggestions for design changes in the event subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated prior to the start of construction. However, our work would not include the supervision or direction of the actual work of the contractor and its employees or agents. Also, job and site safety, and dimensional measurements, will be the responsibility of the contractor. The scope of our work did not include an environmental assessment, but we can provide this service, if requested. The following plates are attached to complete this report: GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Dr. Paul Joos 00November 16, 2000 JN Page ge 11 Plate 1 Vicinity Map Plate 2 Site Exploration Plan Plates 3 - 4 Test Pit Boring Logs Plate 5 Grain Size Analysis Plate 6 Typical Footing Drain We appreciate the opportunity to be of service on this project. If you have any questions, or if we may be of further service, please do not hesitate to contact us. Respectfully submitted, GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. C 6////i Jeffrey M. Johnson Geotechnical Engineer 4G aF wasy I f rk,. : 1. " � • � • Y• ,/ . 27845 �� % 4.'GISTER�� t�4' S`SIONAL ti�1G� /00e, lEXPIRES 10/25/2''l I Marc R. McGinnis, P.E. Principal JMJ/MRM: alt GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. I ' !(El )A L �l,,..1_..R.0- °_' .— N .n,� »�f DT°,47 n p'r ' try-+ UNd t 1 o �.- - t su-. ISAMU'VIEW..... ��12IST ET a i��1 <�A N t 7 rrr° €'� ..:. U . . R ; MIr.NAn 'E N h,ISEN ST �[ p!H n. , 47 ' iwM,.,.,t i` N I �14 t l L a e hMYF \ N i 7}TN ST " y 7 • Cef �C�•� ' .1 '-'L.-,..-""..---- =e fN 4:. kl km PI. I `r--law..�ZiT El .: ' -xil S%t.:Rl I',tit ffTNR_._- 1 F 7JT .W.•1 _ :+_�. 11-.']. PAO sl[*M NRixii_< < I Ny11CI y,. ' a, ! rE NSI N 2 LE. IOITM Si• X U 'I y, n' x NTH tElH _ •1 NE + i}N 1$T �I ..� sE 2p1 I yTashin - ton I > JI NF DR I[ �~ i SE 10 N. t, V O /{' ( w Nf D"°`5f z --a°sr 1 . y`N�1yj s °N(77N° ' 1�I 1 T'Ski° ' , R I ,`: < S NE EEE,m ST o 121 iT xt i:'i ''r, E i SIN '; e" V !Z'r Ne isT' xr 1ru c• 1 C— a 4` 1.,, E: :lilt filailith'�Yx�C�{{ ,y� N!1{IN ST �7 N R _ No ~/'{'/ I 79m Y `�}N-E 14fN,_ST cl£ '.6�y< IE 10"'_ nfN ..` t 9 _� ti O,1,�1r __——__...__ _..__——__ °AT tAVNCN.1;,o r1 , to <.0 i�1°M-_; 11.. o'' �, NF C°utnrl ,z NE E : 3 •S o '6b`: , e t'.i�" ,> 3lnrx t p � 111.1CI1 PARK rAftM°uu aNc y lire `a a I T, n r� _ ili ti `W �'`� I I ;,F, '. cc' $T ,� ',I o,rR Nf t.: ,i,..." N�1<t sr \ 1 v pb'• '. Ei� I ;� :.:e•, . j NEiiuu 11iN ii z �r � •F I' r.,arrr w I' l51' D I 77$'?1 .' Z FST r N.t, ,„! TS ING 'tto. S o 113TH `„� .. ®� I S� '4:. F li _ .„-,, y . 0. sT 5 „ArX,, ST •. 1A Y"_ t _ . r PggK r.� N ' rl, ©® l l r� /� � Oq z 6j°j,' { • >?XfUr1 !! : . \tir _ I I Nr mr t'< "Y_BIM/ Iltf ' '• �® ar R°AT fAIINCN ' O ' In . Z fi° Ei • ❑6!x s T ea[rNc \ n N[ iOfN IT ��•ry > r v. yNira—• < •111 IrlCIt7NU =17� S. z ( a Ni `4, ▪ r▪ 1S'1ttNNE N/rN ., tTs11MN!`> s1 Xw S 1 f. ST•r, S�'ST 4 r Nw�nH ; . EMINERS•, i' �STx R /F (Sg a ii . it..... ....1 ' rrxr "e rne1� .•NE C N[ 1iN � .f Vol CT ,d2krN I °Pt. 1 ,T a 1\ N „' t E„ "�11241x ST T•rfiTN fr A `, f� iN sr ?'._ �:` ` c `▪ a+ -'• NN wS517 9i 2 `��4"e J N<tJTSrlry`" H .:9ten on` ly euaNFrr f :: ,,,P; �:1 N.0 W. �f .T R ` � � 1 ' MAR^ NZ TN��.i Tt - SrX �� n[ �r� l. Af01,41., - f ` I _�1 �_ ` >�' n NTE NRNTOIV�1z 1 EC ENro[N� ` - Eo-}�a r .111R4%.Al �. ^Rif : ,� 07 I.__.'...—— -- - �_ tsr > t� lily 511171ry1 ST < RF ' `N'I t.�.5• < 1N- A No NntS rARRI 1c t "® ,,r yr01' ,r�''St R, z <�`E a •..; 7 . Ilt �< -1 : cftt.vxeM .> 1 -'SST AlJ Nfi• ' [l •Wnr: '< .:::AIRPORT' .Wv',,.I�t���;Ts, rt�•ST =/! SITE 1 - eV' ,.=y S NN n E1 J'° r0�� ` ' E__ •N. °OwNt . IAAY ISIT 't'J . Al �(Vscrom. , t ' .i� F //(. �ytpy I "S I35IN r341,,,f. 'SS Cy tr j !�pn�//• ;�,7 Y """iAIT auver NE SIT t 7'". t �$ 57 -» ATNr0N C .:,fit' llC'CJj a `E.NFrftr �z lek°ar•- °i t i jZND Po ° CCD x Y R„ N i3 I �:•— 1 �•lh./. Lii ''' ^' Ilill1011��� C 12 RR _ __1---_ _ __. i6 -- y ..:. 1 .y `�r WWI �A I 1 s . ,` 1 .e s•}gat:. TQ1L" ] ' ..;0`S 4 TN P�� 's. ` 4 I To ��°?�� EARL! +T©�WI TM 3� E iF�.A st , t: <<t � St r°'tf,N` .2s"�p /_ ���yj7 [A' r ...:I it i::ii ;a®_C �i • F 1.ST \ t NJr �r�' J�� C_ • F.E;1;4;/i.i 7 '`1 1 a? is, ' i >♦♦ .,r A. MA/ILY 'T '..I „tN .. L GOLF carers` ) ,i.__-- "' �I S a i sr ., z < ._. I -.z-1', '' ,J.:. vo.- rARR. I > ,ti B A/aE� �� [ - s ANntlP „�} < > -- is , 1 -wVl^ _ it `.uN°tD SE/ 'AO, I r'OUeSF. N Scale 0 1/2 1 mile :r oa (Source:Thomas Brothers King County Sheet Gukfe and Directory, 1946) VICINITY MAP ----..tif GEOTECH 1532 North Marion Street CONSULTANTS, INC. Bellevue, Washington i Job No: Date: Scale: Male: 00363 Nov. 2000 Not to Scale 1 ALLEY I ; 1 ; 1 , B - 2 � 1 N � i I PROPERTY LINE • • r; �44 1 1 s � 1 I ' i I LEGEND 1 allik APPROXIMATE BORING i LOCATIONS ! ! ; ! (� v B - 1 i ! 1 ' i ! NORTH MARION STREET SITE PLAN GEOTECH 1532 North Marion Street CONSULTANTS, INC. Bellevue, Washington Job No: Date: Scale: Plate: _ 00363 Nov. 2000 Not to Scale 2 • BORING 1 iv' so 4) e Description Reddish-brown, slightly silty, SAND, fine-grained, moist ISP SM 5 16 1 I -becomes brown, medium-dense • • . • • •• 10 19 2 11117. Gray SAND with small gravel, coarse-grained, wet, medium-dense •••. • 1". r 15 — 2 3 Gray SILT with occasional organics, low plasticity, wet, soft ML 20 — 6 4 •I' Gray, silty, SAND, fine-grained, wet, loose ISM I 14. 25 —54.3% 5 5 PT Dark-brown PEAT, fibrous, wet, soft ........ ........ 30 16 6 Gray SAND, fine- to medium-grained, wet, medium-dense ........: .• .•.•:........ ........................................ ........ ........ ....... 35 — 1 SP -becomes coarse-grained with gravels, slightly silty 45 7 ........ .•• .• .•:•..•.• .• 40 — ........ •••.• • 21 8 'BINH * Test boring was terminated at 41.6 feet during drilling on September 26, 2000. * Groundwater seepage was encountered at 10 feet during drilling. BORING LOG GEOTECH 1532 North Marion Street CONSULTANTS, INC. Renton, Washington Job No: Date: Logged by: Plate: 00363 October 2000 JJ 3 • �`' 4 \py tF° Q\ G� BORING 2 G°r �ao Y Q $a 5 Description I: : Tan-brown, silty SAND, fine-grained, dry to moist SMI , 5 -becomes medium-dense 12 1 I 16 2 ;d€::d:: Gray SAND with gravel, coarse-grained, wet, medium-dense Q D : :a::: 15 5 3 e ::a:;:6ti:ia ; Gray SILT with occasional organics, low plasticity, wet, soft ML 20 — 6 4 I' ; ; Gray, silty SAND, fine-grained, wet, loose !ISM 25 —ss.s% 6 5 Dark-brown PEAT, fibrous, wet, soft PT 30 -- _ 16 6 I Gray, silty SAND, fine-grained, wet, medium-dense SM 35 — 24 7 :1 SP ih Gray SAND, medium-grained, wet, medium-dense * Test boring was terminated at 36.6 feet due to heaving sand during drilling on September 26, 2000. 40— * Groundwater seepage was encountered at 10 feet during drilling. BORING LOG GEOTECH 1532 North Marion Street CONSULTANT'S, INC. Renton, Washington Job No: Date: Logged by: Plate: 00363 October 2000 JJ 4 • Percent Passed 2 P. 8 M N O O 0.01 t #200 0.10 #100 #40 . w3cn i.. H 1.00 (1) in o #10 > ''L. #4 3/8" 10.00 m . 3/4" I o 0 0 1 1/2" c 0` g 100.00 Grain Size Analysis GEOTECH 1532 North Marion Street CONSULTANTS, INC. Renton, Washington Job No: Date: Plate: 00363 October 2000 5 Slope backfill away from foundation. Provide surface drains where necessary. Tightline Roof Drain (Do not connect to footing drain) Backfill 0.4_,,/\•:,-,''..:.1. : (See text for requirements) IVapor Retarder r Nonwoven Geotextile a or Barrier Filter Fabric 41 SLAB .,.O,Q_1 ,, n a ,‘•0 •G.n O •A•C.• .D. .n••a•.Q -•0•. J J a J e J r 1 1 - 8 r °C a' •u,•C �,.�� .G,' .r P O O O O k°) rL1 i � ffo.° odCC +C- . ''�t •.� �0 o c o - f +' v • o t �a .� rx r Y.. h�!+ g .� tit .y ',t a w t1 , ¢t� te°C•,r' a ! Q eo G,' �� Go . , .c n 'e. 000 OrO �,¢x � .i e� z r �.P�;�" J. yyn � 't� �i'P r .•1i. •o .°•� ^.c',° c 'o .r. o cn .o,et � n •. •0 r C on. �,O,O p y,.�t�'t a * ^J III llll=_1 ii �. 6" ` JOeOa_•OJO _ ..= min. _ J ' nll- Free-Draining Gravel 4" Perforated Hard PVC Pipe (if appropriate) (Invert at least 6 inches below slab or crawl space. Slope to drain to appropriate outfall. Place holes downward.) •OTES: ) In crawl spaces, provide an outlet drain to prevent buildup of water that bypasses the perimeter footing drains. (2) Refer to report text for additional drainage and waterproofing considerations. FOOTING DRAIN DETAIL ,..4111. GEOTECH 1532 North Marion Street CONSULTANTS, INC. Bellevue, Washington -_— � Scale Job No: Dale: plate; I 00363 Nov. 2000 Not to Scale I 6 r 1102-19TH AVE. EAST•SEATTLE,WA 98112.3221192•FAX:322-5161 28 December, 2001 Lesley Nishihira,Associate Planner Planning/Building/Public Works City of Renton 1005 South Grady Way Sixth Floor Renton, WA 98055 1,f RE: Joos Storage Building/Drainage Narrative 1532 North Marion Street Pre-app No: 00-61 Dear Ms. Nishihira: The existing drainage conditions on the site are as follows: The site is essentially flat and predominantly landscaped with sod. The existing single-family residence, garage, garage drive and walkway comprise 2,154 SF of impervious surface,which is 21.2% of the site. The destination of the downspout drains from the house and garage are unknown. It is assumed that runoff from the buildings is contained on the site. There is no known drainage control system on the site. The proposed conceptual drainage control system as proposed on sheet A-4 is outlined as follows: Runoff from the structure's roof will be collected by gutters and downspouts and tight lined to a catch basin in the driveway. Footing drains, on separate lines from the roof drains, will also be collected in this same catch basin. This runoff will be tight- lined to an existing storm line in the south half of Marion Street. All interior surfaces subject to vehicle traffic shall be serviced by floor drains connected to an oil separator and then connected to the sanitary sewer. Impervious surfaces(interior and exterior) subject to vehicle traffic shall be limited to 5000 SF. The attached drainage calculations by K.M. Maw and Associates show less than 0.5 CFS runoff increase between the existing site and the proposed storage building. Therefore, detention facilities for the site are not required. The following "fill source statement" is made: it is anticipated that no fill will be required for this project. If more than 100 cubic yards of fill is required,the City of Renton shall be notified of the fill source prior to placement on the site. If you have any questions regarding this letter or if there is any additional information you require, you are welcome to call (206) 322-1192 or email me neal@rhnewellaia.com. Sincerely, Neal Thompson Roger H. Newell, AIA f111 f`..I I. I If U' 1 •L. ENTER Ed: ) [path] f i?ename xt] FOR STORAGE OF COMPU'-__ HYDROGRAPH: 0 2NT1 ON.-DAT FILE ALREADY EXIST: OVERWRITE (Y or N) Y SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP N STORM OPTIONS: 1 - S .C.S. 'TYPE-1A 2 - 7-DAY. DESIGN STORM 3 - STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: 1 S .C.S . TYPE-lA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER FREQ(YEAR) , DURATION(HOUR) , PRECIP(INCHES) 25, 24, 3.4 *****'*************** S .C .S . TYPE-lA DISTRIBUTION Jr******************* ********* 25-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 3 .40" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ENTER: A (PERV) , CN(PERV) , A(IMPERV) , CN(IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NU. 1 . 02, 86 , . 21, 98, 10 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC (MINUTES) lWeEVIC A CN A CN —' .2 .0 86 . 0 . 2 98 . 0 10 . 0 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK (Hl.2S) VOL (CU-FT) . 18 7 . 83 2558 ENTER [d:] [path] filename [ .ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 0 2NT2 5 N:.DAT FILE ALREADY EXIST; OVERWRITE (Y or N) ? Y SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP S KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Surface Water Management Division HYDROGRAPH PROGRAMS Version 4 . 21B 1 - INFO ON TFIS PROGRAM JAN-14-2002 10:55 v M. MAW, P.E. P.02/06 ' www-r* ************ S .C. TYPE-1A DISTRIBUTION *** '************** ********* 2-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 2 . 00" TOTAL PRECIP . ********* M ENTER: A(PERV) , CN(PERV) , A(IMPERV) , CN(IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 . 02, 86, .21, 98, 10 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC (MINUTES) -I0 A CN A CN .2 .0 86 .0 .2 98 .0 10 . 0 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT), .10 7 . 83 1413 ,. , ENTER [d: l (pathlfilename ( .ext) FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 02NT2N SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, Si - STOP N STORM OPTIONS : 1 - S.C.S . TYPE-lA 2 - 7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 - STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: I S.C.S . TYPE-1A RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR) , DURATION(HOUR) , PRECIP(INCHES) 10, 24, 2 .9 ******************** S .C. S . TYPE-1A DISTRIBUTION ******************** ********* 10-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 2. 90" TOTAL PRECIP . ********* ENTER : A(PERV) , CN(PERV) , A(IMPERV) , ON(IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO . 1 . 02, 86, .21, 98, 10 DATA. PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC (MINUTES) IC if\ ,0f?-^ A CN A CN . 2 . 0 86 . 0 . 2 98 . 0 10 . 0 PEAK-Q (CFS) T-PEAK (HRS) VOL (CU-FT) . 15 7 .83 2147 ENTER (d : I [pathlfilename ( .exel FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 02NT1ON.DAT SPECIFY : C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP STORM OPTIONS : L - S .C. S . TYPE-lA J I"'lIV-1-i—.=Jt.. lJ• .:_ Y..I'I. I'IF1We r.C. f'.U.5="Ut CN A CN• . 2 .2 86 . . 1 98 .0 10 (UPI� y I Cgt 'r(RNi61 PEAK-Q (CFS) T-PEAR(RES) VOL (CU-FT) . 10 7 . 83 1513 ENTER Id: ] [pathl f i1ename. [ .ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH 0.2NT10E .DAT SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P PRINT, S - STOP N STORM OPTIONS : 1 - S.C.S . TYPE-1A 2 - . 7-DAY DESIGN STORM . 3 - .STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: 1 S .C. S . TYPE-1A RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ (YEAR) , DURATION(HOUR) , PRECIP(INCHES) 2.5, 22, 3 ,4 ****,**************** S .C .S . TYPE-lA DISTRIBUTION ******************* ********* 25-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 3 .40" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ENTER: A(PERV) , CN(PERV) , A(IMPERV) , CZd(IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 . 18, 86, . 05, 98 , 10 DATA PRINT-OUT AREA (ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) 22 YnXt*a"T r44-n A CN A CN .2 .2 86 . 0 . 1 98 . 0 10 . 0! PEAK-Q (CFS) T-PEAK(HR.S) VOL (CU-FT) .13 7 . 83 1887 ENTER (d:] (path] filename [ .ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 02NT25E .DAT SPECIFY : C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP N STORM OPTIONS : 1 - S .C .S . TYPE-lA 2 - 7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 - STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: 3 .C. S. TYPE-1A RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ (YEAR) , DURATION(HOUR) , PRECIP (INCHES) 2 , 24, 2 JHr4-14-.uu_ iU•_b K.M. r1HW, r.t. P.04 OE -P STORM OPTIONS : 1 - S .C..S . TYPE-IA 2 - 7-DAY D ES IGN STORM 3 STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: 1 S .C.S. TYPE-LA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER :: ` EREQ (YEAR) , DURATION(HOUR) , PRECIP(INCHES) : 2, 24 2 ****'�*************** S .C.S . TYPE-IA DISTRIBUTION ir***********,r******* ********* 2-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 2 . 00" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ENTER: A(PERV) , CN(PERV) A(IMPERV) , CN(IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO . 1 . 18, 86, . OS, 98, 10 DATA PRINT-OUT: 1 AREA(ACRES) PPERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A 2 Tel, extrlf,k71 . 2 . 2 86 .0 . 1 98 . 0 10 . 0 PEAR-Q (CFS) T-PEAR(HF:S) VOL (CU-FT) .06 7 .83 876 ENTER Ed:] [path] filename [ .ext) FOR STORAGE OF COMAUTED HYDROGRAPH: 02nt2e.dat SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP N STORM! OPTIONS : I - S,.C . S . TYPE-1A 2 - 7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 - STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: S . C. S . TYPE-1A RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ (YEAR) , DURATIDN(HOUR) , PRECIP (INCHES) 10 , 24, 2 . 9 ********-**'r.******** S .C. S. TYPE-lA DISTRIBUTION *****-*- ***''********* ********* 10-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 2 . 90" TOTAL PRECIP. *-******** MITER: AtPERV) , CN(PERV) , A(IMPERV) , CN(IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 . 18, 86, . 05, 98 , 1C )ATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC (MINUTES) I ko STRUCTURAL DESIGN SHEET DATE JOB NO. TRUCTURAL ENGINEER PROJECT DESIGN CENTRAL BULDING SM ET NO: . SEA WMASHINGTON Sit of 42‘714. LOCATION CLIENT CHEC#( ' CO ETAc TD TO AL Asp g to 141, sr = e:2 a5 Ext t C® brT co+1OrTiorl aV)-0, 21rD.OI. dk'.ke. 2 `f) ?4 47ifil YZ = ?•O" • .`E D iioyip 7 Y6 24 •►�� = 3 - • I' N. . = sc, CN t evt4oua. s 96 �r TS flea0tel `�$1C " fe.adizAret I� i.(P1R t?zt57') _ ©•00 , G acR < "• ' N • r • • KM. Maw Associates Consulting Engineer January 14, 2002 Roger Newell 1102 19te Avenue East Seattle, Washington '98112 FAX: 206.322.5161 Attn: Neal Thompson RE: Preliminary Drainage Calculation Dear Neal, Enclosed please find a set of our preliminary drainage calculation for the project located in Renton. Based on our outputs from the"HYD" program, the differences in the new runoffs and the existing runoffs are less than 0.5 cfs(see summary sheet). Please give us a call i.f you have any question. Thank you; Sincerely, K.M. Maw k/02NT1t Central Building 810 Third Avenue Seattle, Washington 98104 (206) 624-7146 TOTAL P.06 1102-19TH AVE.EAST•SEATTLE,WA 98112 322-1192•FAX:322-5161 28 December, 2001 Lesley Nishihira,Associate Planner Planning!Building!Public Works City of Renton -'`'Cy CPr a.i„ 1005 South Grady Way p Sixth Floor /�� C6 Renton, WA 98055 ✓,�1, %(jAi'��o;1c\ RE:Joos Storage Building/Construction Mitigation Description 1532 North Marion Street Pre-app. no: 00-61 Dear Ms. Nishihira: I am writing the required construction mitigation description for a conditional use permit submittal for the above referenced project. The following estimated start and finish dates are subject to approval of the conditional use, environmental review and building permit applications. Please note there is an estimated 479 cubic yards of excavation and no anticipated fill for this project. Proposed beginning of construction September 1, 2002 Proposed ending construction January 31, 2003 Construction hours 7 a.m.—5 p.m. Monday—Friday 8 a.m.—5 p.m. Saturday Hauling/transportation route 1-405 via: Houser; Factory Place North; North Marion Street (to be verified when dump site is approved) Measures to reduce dust,traffic, erosion, etc. Sweep streets as necessary to reduce dust,filter fence at South and Southwest property lines; water spray as necessary to minimize dust Traffic control plan N/A Please call me at 206-322-1192 if you have any questions. Thank you. Sincerely Neal Thompson Roger H. Newell,AIA CHICAGO TITLE ii+1SURANCE COMPANY O10500 NE 8TH,#1700,BELLEVUE,WA 98004 Order No.: 000560361 PROPERTY ADDRESS: 1532 NORTH MARION STREET Your No.: TERRY/JOOS RENTON,WASHINGTON 98055 PAUL N.JOOS 13510 SOUTHEAST 50TH PLACE Ok-fr BELLEVUE,WASHINGTON 98006 F<Op Ci�O.4 • , ✓4 '04 4iti 1.., • • Enclosed are your materials on the above transaction. If you have any questions regarding these materials, please contact us. Thank you for this opportunity to serve you. EASTSIDE TITLE UNIT TELEPHONE:(425)646-9883 FAX:(425)646-9879 TOLL FREE:(800)455-5644 SHAWNA CRUIKSHANK SENIOR TITLE OFFICER AND UNIT MANAGER (E-MAIL:CRUIKSHANKS@CTT.COM) BILL QUASI' SENIOR TITLE OFFICER (E-MAIL:QUASTB@CIT.COM) DAVE BENNEIT TITLE OFFICER (E-MAIL:BENNEIID@CTT.COM) LORI ANN FORBES TITLE OFFICER (E-MAIL:FORBESL@CTT.COM) JANE PERRY TITLE OFFICER (E-MAIL:PERRYJ@CTT.COM) SHERRY CHAMPION TITLE TECHNICIAN «<<<<««««««« <««««««>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TIM DANIELS ADVISORY TITLE OFFICER (E-MAIL:DANIELST@CTT.COM) TITLErI I/RDA/0999 v".P s AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER'S POLICY ,, (10-17-92) ) o CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Nit Si k FSi . Iliii k. / ril 14/1 f Si SUBJECT TO THE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE, THE EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE MI d' CONTAINED IN SCHEDULE B AND THE CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS, CHICAGO TITLE !A INSURANCE COMPANY,a Missouri corporation,herein called the Company,insures,as of Date of Policy shown in Schedule A,against loss or damage, not exceeding the Amount of Insurance stated in Schedule A, sustained or Oti incurred by the insured by reason of: 1. Title to the estate or interest described in Schedule A being vested other than as stated therein; 2. Any defect in or lien or encumbrance on the title; y.. 3. Unmarketability of the title; =_z 4. Lack of a right of access to and from the land. iiir: The Company will also pay the costs,attorneys' fees and expenses incurred in defense of the title, as insured,but only to the extent provided in the Conditions and Stipulations. y. 1 In Witness Whereof,CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY has caused this policy to be signed and sealed as r' of Date of Policy shown in Schedule A,the policy to become valid when countersigned by an authorized signatory.5 1 +: k Issued by: CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY }' 1800 Columbia Seafirst Center By: h:. 701 5th Avenue Seattle,Washington 98104 k: (206) 628-56669 62.4..."...._ President , J_ \NS� T: ;� RI G.. F' F. SEAL ' Fay. °'••. *:;** VeA61^A-4..4))/ (zikilY1A-4/' ( z Secretary .I. ALTA Owner's Policy(10-17-92) • ""CAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPAN )500 NE 8TH,#1700,BELLEVUE,WA 98004 STANDARD OWNER POLICY SCHEDULE A Policy No.: 560361 Amount of Date of Policy: OCTOBER 29, 1999 at 10:02 AM Insurance: $170, 000.00 1. Name of Insured: PAUL N. JOOS AND DESNEE M. JOOS, HUSBAND AND WIFE 2. The estate or interest in the land which is covered by this policy is: FEE SIMPLE 3. Title to the estate or interest in the land is vested in: PAUL N. JOOS AND DESNEE M. JOOS, HUSBAND AND WIFE 4. The land referred to in this policy is described as follows: LOTS 25 AND 26, BLOCK 12, CAR WORKS ADDITION TO RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 15 OF PLATS, PAGE 47, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. ALTAOPA/RDA/0999 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY STANDARD OWNER POLICY SCHEDULE B Policy No.: 560361 EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE This policy does not insure against loss or damage(and the Company will not pay costs,attorneys'fees or expenses) which arise by reason of: GENERAL EXCEPTIONS: A. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. B. Encroachments,overlaps,boundary line disputes,and any other matters which would be disclosed by an accurate survey and inspection of the premises. C. Easements or claims of easements not shown by the public records. D. Any lien,or right to lien,for contributions to employee benefit funds,or for state workers'compensation,or for services,labor,or material heretofore or hereafter furnished,all as imposed by law,and not shown by the public records. E. Taxes or special assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the public records. F. Any service,installation,connection,maintenance,tap,capacity or construction charges for sewer,water, electricity,other utilities, or garbage collection and disposal. G. Reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; Indian tribal codes or regulations,Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, including easements or equitable servitudes. H. Water rights,claims,or title to water. SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS: 1. EXCEPTIONS AND RESERVATIONS CONTAINED IN DEED: FROM: SEATTLE CAR & FOUNDRY COMPANY, A WASH CORP RECORDED: OCTOBER 23, 1914 RECORDING NUMBER: 959794 AS FOLLOWS: EXCEPTING AND RESERVING ALL RIGHT, TITLE AND INTEREST IN AND TO ANY AND ALL MINERAL AND PRECIOUS METALS OF EVERY KIND AND ALL GAS, OIL AND COAL DEPOSITS THAT MAY BE IN OR BENEATH SAID LANDS, AND ALL OF THE RIGHTS AND PRIVILEGES INCIDENT THERETO, WITH THE RIGHT TO ENTER UPON SAID PREMISES AND REMOVE THE SAME THEREFROM. ALTAOPB/RDA/0999 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY STANDARD OWNER POLICY SCHEDULE B (Continued) Policy No.: 560361 SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS AFFECTS: LOT 25 2 . EXCEPTIONS AND RESERVATIONS CONTAINED IN DEED: FROM: PACIFIC CAR & FOUNDRY COMPANY, A CORP OF WA RECORDED: JUNE 9, 1919 RECORDING NUMBER: 1314999 AS FOLLOWS: EXCEPTING AND RESERVING ALL RIGHT, TITLE AND INTEREST IN AND TO ANY AND ALL MINERAL AND PRECIOUS METALS OF EVERY KIND AND ALL GAS, OIL AND COAL DEPOSITS THAT MAY BE IN OR BENEATH SAID LANDS, AND ALL OF THE RIGHTS AND PRIVILEGES INCIDENT THERETO, WITH THE RIGHT TO ENTER UPON SAID PREMISES AND REMOVE THE SAME THEREFROM. AFFECTS: LOT 26 ** END OF SCHEDULE B ** ds AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY Loan Policy Endorsements: NONE Owner' s Policy Endorsements: 2696, 2697 ALTAOPB2/RDA/0999 Your reference. tY/JOOS ENDORSEMENT Attached to and forming a part of Policy No. 560361 Issued By CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Dated: October 29, 1999 ENDORSEMENT 2696 ADDITIONAL PROTECTION ENDORSEMENT FOR HOME OWNERS 1. THIS ENDORSEMENT SHALL BE EFFECTIVE ONLY IF AT DATE OF POLICY THERE IS LOCATED ON THE LAND DESCRIBED IN THE POLICY A ONE-TO-FOUR FAMILY RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE, IN WHICH THE INSURED OWNER RESIDES, EITHER AT DATE OF POLICY OR WITHIN ONE YEAR OF THE DATE OF POLICY, AS THE INSURED OWNER'S PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE. FOR THE PURPOSE OF THIS ENDORSEMENT THE TERM "RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE" IS DEFINED AS THE PRINCIPAL DWELLING STRUCTURE LOCATED ON THE LAND, TOGETHER WITH A GARAGE OR CARPORT USED FOR STORAGE OF NONCOMMERCIAL VEHICLES. THE TERM "RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE" SHALL NOT INCLUDE DETACHED OUTBUILDINGS (OTHER THAN A GARAGE OR CARPORT AS DEFINED HEREIN), DRIVEWAYS, WALKWAYS, BOAT RAMPS, DOCKS, RECREATIONAL FACILITIES OF ANY KIND, SUBSURFACE LINES, PIPES, TANKS, SEPTIC SYSTEMS AND/OR DRAINFIELDS, PLANTINGS OF ANY NATURE, PERIMETER FENCES OR PERIMETER WALLS, OR ANY OTHER IMPROVEMENTS WHICH ARE NOT AN INTEGRAL PART OF THE RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE. 2. THE COMPANY HEREBY INSURES THE INSURED OWNER AGAINST LOSS OR DAMAGE WHICH THE INSURED OWNER SHALL SUSTAIN BY REASON OF: A. THE EXISTENCE AT DATE OF POLICY OF ANY UNRECORDED STATUTORY LIENS FOR LABOR OR MATERIALS ATTACHING TO THE ESTATE OR INTEREST ARISING OUT OF ANY WORK OF IMPROVEMENT ON THE LAND IN PROGRESS OR COMPLETED AT THE DATE OF POLICY, EXCEPT THOSE LIENS ARISING OUT OF A WORK OF IMPROVEMENT FOR WHICH THE INSURED HAS AGREED TO BE RESPONSIBLE. B. THE REMOVAL OF THE RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE OR INTERFERENCE WITH THE USE THEREOF FOR ORDINARY RESIDENTIAL PURPOSES AS THE RESULT OF A FINAL COURT ORDER OR JUDGMENT, BASED UPON THE EXISTENCE AT THE DATE OF POLICY OF: 1) ANY ENCROACHMENT OF THE RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE OR ANY PART THEREOF ONTO ADJOINING LANDS, OR ONTO ANY EASEMENT SHOWN AS A SPECIAL EXCEPTION IN SCHEDULE B OF THE POLICY, OR ONTO ANY UNRECORDED SUBSURFACE EASEMENT; 2) ANY VIOLATION ON THE LAND OF ENFORCEABLE COVENANTS, CONDITIONS OR RESTRICTIONS PROVIDED THAT THIS COVERAGE SHALL NOT REFER TO OR INCLUDE THE TERMS, COVENANTS AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED IN ANY LEASE, SUB-LEASE OR CONTRACT OF SALE REFERRED TO IN THIS POLICY; 3) ANY VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE ZONING ORDINANCES TO THE EXTENT THAT SUCH ORDINANCES REGULATE (A) AREA, WIDTH OR DEPTH OF THE LAND AS A BUILDING SITE FOR THE RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE; (B) FLOOR SPACE AREA OF THE RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE; (C) SETBACK OF THE RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE FROM THE PROPERTY LINES OF THE LAND; OR (D) HEIGHT OF THE RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE. C. DAMAGE TO THE RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE RESULTING FROM THE EXERCISE OF ANY RIGHT TO USE THE SURFACE OF THE LAND FOR THE EXTRACTION OR DEVELOPMENT OF THE MINERALS SHOWN AS AN EXCEPTION IN SCHEDULE B, OR EXCEPTED FROM THE DESCRIPTION OF THE LAND FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS ENDORSEMENT, THE WORDS "COVENANTS," "CONDITIONS" OR "RESTRICTIONS" SHALL NOT BE DEEMED TO REFER TO OR INCLUDE ANY COVENANTS, CONDITIONS OR RESTRICTIONS RELATING TO ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, EXCEPT TO THE EXTENT THAT A NOTICE OF VIOLATION OR ALLEGED VIOLATION AFFECTING THE LAND HAS BEEN RECORDED IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS AT DATE OF POLICY AND IS NOT EXCEPTED IN SCHEDULE B. THIS ENDORSEMENT IS MADE A PART OF THE POLICY AND IS SUBJECT TO ALL OF THE TERMS AND PROVISIONS THEREOF AND OF ANY PRIOR ENDORSEMENTS THERETO. EXCEPT TO THE EXTENT EXPRESSLY STATED, IT NEITHER MODIFIES ANY OF THE TERMS AND PROVISIONS OF THE POLICY AND ANY PRIOR ENDORSEMENTS, NOR DOES IT EXTEND THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE POLICY AND ANY PRIOR ENDORSEMENTS, NOR DOES /I/TT IN(CCREASSEE THE FACE AMOUNT THEREOF. Authorized Signatory Note: This endorsement shall not be valid or binding until countersigned by an authorized signatory ENDOP/3-21-92/SC Your reference. Y/JOOS ENDORSEMENT Attached to and forming a part of Policy No. 560361 Issued By CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Dated: October 29, 1999 ENDORSEMENT 2697 - HOMEOWNER'S INFLATION PROTECTION ENDORSEMENT The Company, recognizing the current effect of inflation on real property valuation and intending to provide additional monetary protection to the Insured Owner named in said Policy, hereby modifies said Policy as follows: 1. Notwithstanding anything contained in said Policy to the contrary, the amount of insurance provided by said Policy, as stated in Schedule A thereof, is subject to cumulative annual upward adjustments in the manner and to the extent hereinafter specified. 2. "Adjustment Date" is defined, for the purpose of this Endorsement, to be 12:01 a.m. on the first January 1 which occurs more than six months after the Date of Policy, as shown in Schedule A of the Policy to which this Endorsement is attached, and on each succeeding January 1. 3. An upward adjustment will be made on each of the Adjustment Dates as defined above, by increasing the maximum amount of insurance provided by said policy (as said amount may have been increased theretofore under the terms this Endorsement) by the same percentage, if any, by which the United States Department of Commerce Composite Construction Cost Index for the month of September immediately preceding exceeds such index for the month of September one year earlier; provided, however, that the maximum amount of insurance in force shall never exceed 150% of the amount of insurance stated in Schedule A of said Policy, less the amount of any claim paid under said policy, which, under the terms of the Conditions and Stipulations, reduces the amount of insurance in force. There shall be no annual adjustment in the amount of insurance for years in which there is no increase in said Construction Cost Index. 4. In the settlement of any claim against the Company under said Policy, the amount of insurance in force shall be deemed to be the amount which is in force as of the date on which the insured claimant first learned of the assertion or possible assertion of such claim, or as of the date of receipt by the Company of the first notice of such claim, whichever shall first occur. PROVIDED, HOWEVER, this endorsement shall be effective only if one of the following conditions exists at Date of Policy: a. The land described in this policy is a parcel on which there is only a one-to-four family residential structure, including all improvements on the land related to residential use, in which the Insured Owner resides or intends to reside; or, b. The land consists of a residential condominium unit, together with the common elements appurtenant thereto and related to residential use thereof, in which the Insured Owner resides or intends to reside. This endorsement is made a part of the policy and is subject to all the terms and provisions thereof and of any prior endorsements thereto. Except to the extent expressly stated, it neither modifies any of the terms and provisions of the policy and prior endorsements, if any, nor does it extend the effective date of the policy and prior endorsements or increase the face amount thereof. f Authorized Signatory Note: This endorsement shall not be valid or binding until countersigned by an authorized signatory ENDOPC/321-92/SC �. i' llf-7 X^Z Chicago Title Insurance Company 0 I1.tPORTANT: This is not a Plat of Survey. It is !urnishod as a convenience to locate the land indicated hereon with reference to streets and other land.No liability is assumed by reason of reliance hereon. • ORDER NO. • • Car- WorkS Add. to7enEor, R**Com -_ )r4 -- - N. 4-„+ST. M r 4- ,. , . .. .. �. 47.479. A9 'h, 3 , 30 36 I 1 -.- IG w 5 IN 1 ' z\I 3 4 5 G 7 8 9 10 •1 I %2. 13 14 15, ., 42 ti L1A I I 'IN, 1 1 .1_ \ I — 12 . j/ 6,x).3^; epi t -pi 3o' ///3 IL N17 18 lPea, 1 al i l ,$, ,� 1 zZ 23 24- 25 ?b 27 2f3 �9N (¢ ` I i 40 - 6, _,, ,,.._ .. N . MARION ST. /1/ N • s-. .-1 35 , I 61j/ , \ Ib4el,01„016.4 CCA rf /• • - )el tO rI n.c...,; is ..l. tve.l"n1•i un 761t1. •f...t .. - 05 )Cl/. 19991029000415 PAGE 001 OF 003 10/29/1999 10:02 KING COUNTY, WA CHICAGO TITLE WD 10.00 WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO PAUL N.JOOS AND DESNEE M.JOOS 13510 SOUTHEAST 50TH PLACE E1718713 BELLEVUE,WASHINGTON 98006 10/ 9/1999 09:26 TAX LE $170:000.00 PAGE 001 OF 001 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY ter, STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED 560361 — , Dated: OCTOBER 26,1999 THE GRANTOR ELIZABETH TERRY,AN UNMARRIED PERSON,AS HER SEPARATE ESTATE for and in consideration of TEN DOLLARS AND OTHER GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION in hand paid,conveys and warrants to PAUL N.JOOS AND DESNEE M.JOOS,HUSBAND AND WIFE the following described real estate situated in the County of KING State of Washington: Tax Account Number(s): 135230-1285-00 LOTS 25 AND 26, BLOCK 12, CAR WORKS ADDITION TO RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 15 OF PLATS, PAGE 47, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. SUBJECT TO: EXCEPTIONS SET FORTH ON ATTACHED EXHIBIT "A" AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF AS IF FULLY INCORPORATED HEREIN. STATE OF WASHINGTON SS COUNTY OF KING ON THIS c7 ft) DAY OF OCTOBER, 1999 BEFORE ME, THE UNDERSIGNED, A NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, DULY COMMISSIONED AND SWORN, PERSONALLY APPEARED ELIZABETH TERRY KNOWN TO ME TO BE THE INDIVIDUAL DESCRIBED IN AND WHO EXECUTED THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED THAT SHE SIGNED AND SEALED THE SAME AS HER FREE AND VOL TARY ACT AND DEED, FOR THE USES AND PURPOSES HEREIN MENTIONED. NOTARY SIGNATURE Ai/ l PRINTED NAME: /V// C I<.I e �J �/" NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RESIDING AT `5F/?77C-F MY COMMISSION EXPIRES ON /;1.-/S'2D0O . 0 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY EXHIBIT A Escrow No.: 560361 EXCEPTIONS AND RESERVATIONS CONTAINED IN DEED: FROM: SEATTLE CAR & FOUNDRY COMPANY, A WASH CORP RECORDED: OCTOBER 23, 1914 RECORDING NUMBER: 959794 AS FOLLOWS: EXCEPTING AND RESERVING ALL RIGHT, TITLE AND INTEREST IN AND TO ANY AND ALL MINERAL AND PRECIOUS METALS OF EVERY KIND AND ALL GAS, OIL AND COAL DEPOSITS THAT MAY BE IN OR BENEATH SAID LANDS, AND ALL OF THE RIGHTS AND PRIVILEGES INCIDENT THERETO, WITH THE RIGHT TO ENTER UPON SAID PREMISES AND REMOVE THE SAME THEREFROM. AFFECTS: LOT 25 EXCEPTIONS AND RESERVATIONS CONTAINED IN DEED: FROM: PACIFIC CAR & FOUNDRY COMPANY, A CORP OF WA RECORDED: JUNE 9, 1919 RECORDING NUMBER: 1314999 AS FOLLOWS: EXCEPTING AND RESERVING ALL RIGHT, TITLE AND INTEREST IN AND TO ANY AND ALL MINERAL AND PRECIOUS METALS OF EVERY KIND AND ALL GAS, OIL AND COAL DEPOSITS THAT MAY BE IN OR BENEATH SAID LANDS, AND ALL OF THE RIGHTS AND PRIVILEGES INCIDENT THERETO, WITH THE RIGHT TO ENTER UPON SAID PREMISES AND REMOVE THE SAME THEREFROM. AFFECTS: LOT 26