The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA02-042 a © CITY OF RENTON - pTT��l ' ma Planning/Building/Public Works RETURN To Q 4. oIib., 41055 South Grady Way - Renton Washington 98055 A `"B A H IIAT 08'0 2 � ,•`m Q 3 Z Z PRS f 1R EC° .r o ► 2)81 051 /02 PBMETER ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED 7123839 U.S. POSTAGE # Bnsf Rwy Co ,,> ,'' King C "` *Marcel#'1 .1 125380 0230 1 Golf Road �2 cll4unib Ada ,��;� �� 0 .ram n. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE<!1 r ' . • '. .e&FessP.�t• USPS 1\4 Permit No.G-10 • Sender: Please print`you,r, n/address, and ZIP+4 is box • Aattleitifiloor F%&k. City of Renton Code Compliance Inspector 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 li,64-6Z—O •ENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERY ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3.Also complete A. Received by(Please Print Clearly) B. tef pbliyery��item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. �[--ss ■ Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. C. Signature `IN Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, X ) _ I ❑Agent or on the front if space permits. �t/� ❑Addressee D. I d live y dress different from item 1? ❑ Yes I. Article Addressed to: I Y S,bnt delivery address below: ID No Ntit VX Oa litStifen" at. _ `ALI. 14 , Ve)P0 3. Service Type K+V V1e V I, e?Il , ge05 L eisie Registered Mail ❑ Expresseturn Mail !lxLOA ❑ El Return Receipt for Merchandise ❑ Insured Mail 0 C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery?(Extra Fee) ❑Yes ?. Article Number(Copy from service label) 7001 2510 0008 8607 4670 'S Form 3811,July 1999 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-99-M-1789 Smooth Feed SheetsTM Use template for 5160® Eugene T.&Penny R.Church Powell-Renton No. 1 Llc Pietromonaco of Modem Llc King County Parcel# 125360 0010 King County Parcel# 125360 0070 King County Parcel# 125379 0010 3820 E.Valley Road 737 Market Street P.O.Box 700 Renton,WA 98055 Kirkland,WA 98033 Mercer Island,WA 98040 Portal Security Llc Motor Freight L L C United Title Corp. King County Parcel# 125379 0020 King County Parcel# 125380 0010 King County Parcel# 125380 0020 812 SW 128th Street P.O.Box 4679 3435 SE 17th Avenue Seattle,WA 98146 Seattle,WA 98104 Portland,OR 97202 Puget Sound Energy&Elec Lecuyer Family L L C Lecuyer Family L L C King County Parcel# 123580 0021 King County Parcel# 1251380 0030 King County Parcel# 125380 0032 P.O.Box 90868 14900 Interurban Ave. S.,Suite 210 14900 Interurban Ave. S.,Suite 210 Bellevue,WA 98009 Seattle,WA 98168 Seattle,WA 98168 Brekke Properties Brekke Properties American Legend Cooperative King County Parcel# 125380 0034 King County Parcel# 125380 0035 King County Parcel# 125380 0040 P.O.Box 287 8592 Hunts Point Ln 200 SW 34th Street Medina,WA 98039 Bellevue,WA 98004 Renton,WA 98055 A/H II Company Llc Con-Way Transportation Services,Inc. American Legend Cooperative King County Parcel# 125380 0060 King County Parcel# 125380 0080 King County Parcel# 125380 0090 2098 Breezy Point Road 110 Parkland Plaza 200 SW 34th Street Camano Island,WA 98282 Ann Arbor,MI 48103 Renton,WA 98055 Corr-Pro Associates Llc Pietromonaco Illc Farwest Steel Corporation King County Parcel# 125380 0110 King County Parcel# 125380 0120 King County Parcel# 125380 0211 301 SW 27th Street P.O.Box 700 P.O.Box 889 Renton,WA 98055 Mercer Island,WA 98040 Eugene,OR 97440 Farwest Steel Corporation Bnsf Rwy Co. King County Parcel# 125380 0211 King County Parcel# 125380 0230 P.O.Box 889 1700 E. Golf Road Eugene,OR 97440 Schaumburg,IL 60173 Onk.*---C) 1 AVERY,1. Address labels Laser 5160® I- I- I- I- I V L I CL R � �I _ ,} °ir B U R L I .N .G T O N NORTHERN ; . i I �.- 01: Li I e ` . m - o N:. , c8)., 9 s 0 I¢II C ill o en � `��_' __ Qrr rya o }I tr dam^s �`I ,,,o`i I N d 1 S T R I A L P A R K R E N T 0 N ZL 0 O �A 5 , i!ll m c w Ill ;I _; i 6`.I °" a ! itt D' 1 ICI � • ['rI�E mm tl e t 4 to ,aa, .<. 0 a Q m = a 1 I Till ® .. 1 • ..• _ LIND M AVE a ° __._ e __- LIND AVE. . as mx. a,« ;;�Iw ��4 1 /1 1 I ,I l a �I )�ji /jam i� I II l y ' . a I!11 m I' • . a I ► f in !I( S( �'%' R E PII;L A T f I t11 'I II� }}4 I• ' t Pill tilg I — ' j ~,.. I I Y�_ . ; I�1 }1 u, 1 \ M=11�——.,.. r '——— _. ...:.,.I —, -._ _ _ J 3 rn 1,11 1lI gflfifll _ BURL I NGTO NORTHERN OR ILL IA 6�I. ; N 1 1 \ . .� . m FII _ o to 111 Itt 1 M , co 1\__ *ARK ❑ F r t11j I' "_ DUSTR I AL r p R K O F R E TON DPI V. I • .a u o ° �r 1,III m 1111 lI°;:: °II z o z~ {j < �I a s • lli U 111111 --II I "'....... ..... .. ..... .. EAST e...:,, VALLEY^.•. .....ND:. .. ..F ., ..• "....-,^ ...�.. _ .. -^^.+^EAST..�...--VALLEY'X� :.yD..... '.. m ® I N I� • LEGEND: NEIGHBORHOOD DETAIL MAP SUBJECT SITE 0' 200' 400' 600' CON -WAY RENTON SCALE:i''= 200' PROJECT NO.501020004 DATE 03-05-2002 . a. Up CITY OF CWX SERVICE CENTER FACILITY o4/ON/02 ._ RENTON 400 SW 34TH ST RENTON, WASHINGTON ,-., Planning/Builtlng/PuOLc Works Dept. NEIGHBORHOOD DETAIL MAP YC-00B NO. REVISION BY DATE APPR •'r A—NNNNAA • COLUMN 1 I COLUMN 2 I COLUMN 3 I COLUMN 4 • s OOa.. 0 0 O O PROPERTy NE ® MTh DZ„GH .RMIH MILORD GUTTER p PRE-Mt MET.ROOF PRE-EIN.METAL ROOF Allh -R I - - m VTL BIDE MW, I D 5 I I &R WIRED)4 R� R NN G WH SEE ELEVATIONS.1 i I rxrE 00VMSPERITS i INC PIGID FRAME ED-D EE ,00-0 - A'XVI CURBS _ I :NM I M.. 4.-CURB 1 i FIN GRADE J Oil L'J TOP a PAVEMENT L IJ 0 LiFOR LouTIGNs In LI IJ AT I c.JUND LINE PR_e LI IJ•L�J • Limn OF E.cAu.noN EUEL TAM NOM PIPE BOLUROS NOT SHOWN-SEC PLAN FOR NUMBER ANO LOCATION 3 TYPICAL SIDE ELEVATION TYPICAL END ELEVATION(29th STREET AND 34th STREET) SECTION 10 A al acNF: ,M'-1'-0• zTiLE. 1/e•.I•-o' srnc. ,/e•-1•ro• F 04/0/02 PUNNING DEPARTMENT SUBMIrtu. REV DATE DESCRIPTION DRW: SUBMITTAL 03/01/02 G CWX SERVICE CENTER FACILITY PROJECT NO.501020004 400 SW]!TH ST ENTON.WASHINGTON 'r n ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER _ re CON-WAY TRANSPORTATION SERVICES. INC. Li 110 VIAND RAU eNN T(73 MI Rama � PHONE()]!)Tfi9-020] FA%(T]!)214-8850 . Taav9 s ta0 CRANE.0 BURS AOD 6M(6y1B.Eil 94814— ? CI S"T/QrV 510 935-21a1 FA% 510 835-9939 SHEET TITLE FILE NO FAS1.1.y DON:PRE SHEET FUEL ISLAND .ANE:N" ELEVATIONS AND SECTION 1z/os/01 FA-31 o COLUMN I I COLUMN 2 ( COLUMN 3 I COLUMN 4 • 0 z 0 FOR PAvENENT SLOPE wN sEE snE PVNs I I 1 zNEErEz o, FoEL M On-WATER SEPARATOR li=== = CCM' 0 IV I —I sg ( ) ncuNO oRwcs •-�WILE!6.564 E J k Q�lr71El PEl=� 0 GENERAL NOTES: I CANOE,COMPONENTS SHALL MATCH DOCIT 512ILDING IN APPEMUNCE.SHAPE AND COLOR uWOPJ.m+c 1e•-o• zO-o ,e'-o 1_, z-o Wo coots. RK RRDESIGN REOROVI PROVIDE ITEMS OF RE SHALL REQUIRED TO NEET THE COVEPN 3.CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLY ALL OPEN.AND ROOF CONES REQUIRED CANOE,MOVE TO SEAL THE PLUMBING ITEMS OF TME FUELING SYSTEM WHICH PASS TM THE ROOF 4.FOR PAWN,OPANA4E.AND ISLAX0 CONSTRUCTION SEE MTE DRAWN. DRAWINGS © 0 0 A TOTAL OF 9OF HN NAY o CO.D .SHALL LIGHTS es um CENTER LINE or 7 THE ENTIRE STRUCTURAL ERA.SNALL BE PR.PANTED IN THE In SHOP ONO GWEN.0 ADDITIONAL COATS N THE FIEED TO THE COLCR SPECIFIED B+THE OWNER FUEL ISLAND PUN 0 04/05/02 PNNING OEPARTMENt SUOMIfAL REV WiE U OESCRIPi10N ORR SUBMITTAL 03/01/02 CWX SERVICE CENTER FACILITY PROJECT NO.501020004 =sw sr REMON.WA V SHINCiON ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 3 — F mCON-WAY TRANSPORTATION SERVICES,INC. 110 PA UND`IPSA AR(73.MI 820} PHONE()34)769-0203 FM(734)214-5650 Ii 160 GRAND AVE, SUITE 400 DAKIAND.9F9461-2— ?ATAGVV (510 635-2761 o CM(510)6}5-96}9 V SHEET TITLE PILE NO PA01.2. OWN PRN SHEET 101 FUEL ISLAND PLAN DATE FA-01 12/05/01 4 COLUMN 1 I COLUMN 2 I COLUMN 3 I COLUMN 4 ✓ CENTERUNE ROOF RIDGE 1 ROLLED AND STAPLED INSULATION W/2"WIDE CONTINUOUS VAPOR TIGHT EDGE TABS EXHAUST FAN.SEE ELECT ADJUSTABLE DUAL HEAD 1 Ir 1• ROOF FLOOD LIGHT FIXTURE LONG SPANI y ROOF PANELS iO � L ♦ a rn!- W� i i�rr a' ROOF BEAM I 9'-0"WIDE x 9'-6"HIGH E- ROLL UP STEEL DOOR I .3 U O OWNER SPECIFIED, I CANOPY BEAM i CONTRACTOR FURNISHED f AND INSTALLED •� SEE DPOST, j SEE DTL. 10/DA 41 , WHITE MTL.DOOR FRAME F MTL I BLDG.MFR. o "D.L.M. NEVERLIFT"DOCK FIRE E%TINGUISHER `O LEVELER MODEL�'NL722O 6 I (N) FIN. FLOOR ELEV. = 100'-7" SIDEWALL COL. p is SEE PLAN.TYP. - 3 w/RUBBER DOCK BUMPERS CONC. SLAB, BY MTL BLDG � SEE STRUCT. (E)FIN FLOOR EL = 100'-0'• MFR. It CONC.APRON,SEE STRUCT.� \� �� — - - `��\�� O`.A\V 1 `A .i irx wN 4 y /I�AS4 ,a g n COMPACTED FILL I\� T`_ _ --.' 32.-2 1/2"- EXISTING CONCRETE SLAB(V.I.F.) _ 10'-0" 60'-0" _ 10'-0" _ NOM NOM. OVERHANG OVERHANG 0 a OK SECTION I 0a/05/02 PUANNJNO DEPARTMENT SUBMITTAL I REV DATE OESCRIPTION 010. I SUBMITTAL 03/01/02 G CWX SERVICE CENTER FACILITY PROJECT NO.501020004 Rg400 SW.NTH ST ENTON.WASHGTON a N ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 3 Ei CON-WAY TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, INC. IAN0 Pea PUW03 PHONE(0N)269-02 0 3 FA%(]]a)214-5650 1. 100 CRANE AVE. WWII).CA 94612 77G1"/ (510)555-2761 FAX(510)235-BB39 SHEET TITLE RILE HO DAN 0,9 D. SKIT DOCK SECTION DATE /01 DA-32 12/05 DA32.DWG User: prkoprolev D2/14/02 15:49 42 XRef Files. G:\201\20101 XXX Con-Woy Renton\SharedOato\.odr22.34 dog VA COLUMN 1 I COLUMN 2 I COLUMN 3 I COLUMN 4 DOCK DOOR IGN. WHITE MTL.GUTTER ADJUSTABLE DUAL HEAD SEE DTI. 13 DA 43— &DOWNSPOUT ROOF FLOOD LIGHT FI%TURF T (N)LOADING DOCCKK�� El OFFICE BLDG. x6 x5 x4 xa xx xl O 19yD 17 le 15 14 I] 12 II to O K un,c,.... , I -1wiiiii1111111111i11ivii,i11111ii11ii111i11111M1111 iiic1111111211111111;i1wii11IIII:IIii;Ii111111i�III:IEIHIiiiiimii'im_1iiiimiiciii1111111i_ii��iii11imiiioi iciiim�iiiomiiiiii111.1�°��,��,1��,��r�;�_,=m��,��_��::::�%7��_��—„:�,14,��.,� fIN FLOOR ELEV imI I Ii l l : s= Jk��iI il I , € I kg__R—kg II E_ }=SL. fG�EI I�iV' ® YWl1fg i ItflEl ABS ELEV=+25 83 c — LADDER&GRAB Y"PAINTED YELLOW NOTF BAR,SEE DTL. STRIPE, B/DA 42 TYP. MTL.BLDG.MFR.TO SIZE GUTTERS&DOWNSPOUTS AND DETERMINE LOCATIONS OF DOWNSPOUTS. (LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROX.) DOCK — WEST ELEVATION SCALE 1/16-- 1'-0- o WHITE METAL ROOF PANELS.TYP. WHITE METAL WALL PANELS.TYP. a (E)OFFICE BLDG (N)LOADING DOCKI T T 77 T T 8 is tI ® 1) 1e 19 z0 7 2} T T T • J.. va II.,.ii.iiii.ii■niiiuuillmmanu■nn1111n 1iW■n■n■nnlm.m.nl■1111•IOn•nn•nnullmIIDI■nnl■IlIuI111111llnnnm nnnn•nmm11nrIuuuIilnt•n■■nnniIIJuI nl■Ir1n■IGn•Inunn•uIu IIIIII■R■11111IIIII•IrJII■Ir>In■nnl■nln■n11111nnnliI _ -iiiiiiiiiiiiiii iiiiliRiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iiiiiiiiiiiii iiiiiiiiii' II■I I�IIIII�I iliiiiii iii Ii■Iliiiiiiiiiiiiibiii111i1 ini iiaiiiiiiliiii I*1 iiaiiiii■iiiiii1iiiiil�liil ii■Riiiiiiiiiiiiaiiii I Iii■i li■1 irai li■i 1i■IIii1■Iuiiau -II IoImIlImI Im I- -I m1% 1 IM�-_N-IINIm %MEIN - Im <r�i■■i�-mil`irii`i-i■■ili imil`ir�r�°imir�`i Ymiril`il`�4mirii- imiimi-imil�r �►miliririritiffii`r LADDER&GRAB Y"LOINTED TRIPE. 8/DA SEE DTL. TYPIPE, P1 DOCK — EAST ELEVATION ie SCALE 1/16"= 1'-0- DOCK DOOR SIGN, SEE DTL. 14/DA 43 0 1 12 - • 12 . II 11 :I STL. STAIR.SEE 04/ON/9z PLANNING CEP/EDAM BMBumAL —h a 11111l1 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIr1111111111��I1��ii DTL. 1/DA 44 RF 00 E DESORPTION 0Rw: SUBM e ABS ELEV = +25.83 _ m_ m_ 41r lkJ"' WE _ PIPE BOLLARD m'� 05/01 oz FIN.FLR EL.=100.-7" i— SEE OTL 15/DA 42 . CWX SERVICE CENTER FACILITY PROJECT NM 501020004 FIN.GRADE EL. "�1iri✓=`r�i✓■= ■_\ i' .1r.,0N1i,w0511MTOTON ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 3 a FTG. &FNDN, 4"PAINTED YELLOW CON-WAY TRANSPORTATION SERVICES,INC. R SEE STRUCT. STRIPE LADDER&GRAB BAR, DOCK LEVELER J o PAR0VNo P. ARBORl xe20.} SEE DTL.8/DA 42 &BUMPERS PHONE(x},u�)]89-020} FAX(]N)214-5850 : leo GRAND AYE, DOCK - NORTH FI FVATION (29th STREET) p„ SUITE 400 SCALE 1/16-= 1'-0- -- - ygZ)A[-ryy 5101616-2781 FA%(510)835-9839 SHEET TITLE Fla NO.OA)1.8-9 DWN.PRK BEET DOCK ELEVATIONS DR�� DA-31 Ix/05/01 DA31.DWG User. prkop lev 03/05/02 18:40:49 %Ref Files:G:\OND2\501020004 Renton\ShoredDala\xbdr22x34-Orch clog I .. COLUMN 1 I COLUMN 2 I COLUMN 3 I COLUMN 0 20 O 0 0 O ® 0 10 0 0 O 0 a ® 0 11 0 0 0 0 G --• OFFCE BLOO. O I I I I I I tb YN -a 1 OVFRNw° ^5a R[^ 2. 7.41 TT 1 r T 1 r T[�� 1 r 1 1 r T 1 r T 1 r m m m m m o m m m m © m -■ m m m..EU m,.m m m m m m o m m m, .m m m m m m o El..II..o o I, ' GI E E w b° [` =' = .o —a [= —a I. Ai -� N — — Bi[ �a COL-oRT Ell' .I I I I I • I I I I I I I aMAD�N 9BB /I a I SECTOR r l - o<ooc.aooRNER SEMI DESK L on 10/w�RI DESK( ....... .I nOEls sE[sFt OD DOCK r l s1AIR err-GI SHOW �rRxtmrr FOR s[ mv1M00°ncc.•wns ' I i'a J-�_ °eouu0 y LOWAUT rww �I DRAWINGS _ m m'p o m m� 6Z o �o ®� ® m o o m © 1.7 o m m m m m m m min] 1I m m m m 1 m m I to 0 0 0 © r yl - L - AVOA a R. w>:wPNc mow 1 1 I I_ ti m ELEGIAC.PANEL SEW ft.SEE OEL. BIM VOA 44 01,13 Ai DOCK PlNISNEO FLOOR EXvt-xweveO Ow arcs ♦-•• II'. EEEVANON s[[DR.ts%n a. I E'- -AAA' CMD CISE SEE SITE PLANS �� I(�I n 1oI AAI Z 6T - pro Z 4 MOAK FLOOR WATERER.SEE 04/05/02 PUNNING DEPARTMENT SUBMIT. REV DATE OESCRP1l06 CM' SUBMITTAL 03/01/02 G CWX SERVICE CENTER FACILITY PROJECT 110.501020004 i 400 SW NTN Sr SS! RENTON.wA5MIN0TON a. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER R CON-WAY TRANSPORTATION SERVICES.INC. 1 RAIN 22ARBOR b 0t 3 NI PHONE(7N)769-0203 PAX(734)214-5650 .0. 180 GRAND SUITE 400 CA9.12 7 V 510{035-2781 FAX 510f 835-9030 ' SHEET ME ME NO.DA01 6.9 OX5I:PRK WEFT CKp:XA DOCK FLOOR PLAN ui DA-01 - o5/o1 )A01.DWG W50 prkopr lev 3/OS/02 18:37:48 26 0 Files:G:\OKO2\501020004 Renton\ShoredDRtR\00dr22034-arch.dwg J NB COLUMN I I COLUMN 2 I COLUMN 3 I COLUMN 4 4+61.25 E-_ (E)AND(N)ROOFTOP UNITS (E) RAIL TO REMAIN Q+52.25 I�I!ilCillllilllli IIIIII II�IIIII�lI ll Illl�l Iflhlllllllllllll Illlll IIIIIIIIIIIIII��IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII! E E f 3 (E) UNPAINTED COPCRETE WALLS. g TO REMAIN,TIP. \\ �• (E) HOLLOW METAL 1"INSULATED LOW 'E"GLASS IN DOOR&FRAME ANODIZED ALUMINUM FRAME 0 SS gg55+2se3 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII� IIIII1IIIIIII lii �lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll1III��III FIN. F DOFF ELEV� FIN. FLOOR ELEV. �� ' +21.66 - +21.00$y FIN GRADE ELEV I - 1 FIN GRADE ELEV.Y 1' I LI 1L LJ '3 WEST ELEVATION a c 0 IIIIIIIII_ II_ihIIIIIIIIIIIIIIi iIi!IiIIIj i :T_.,._ _'.iIIJI I I Illll' ii� �II'LiQ thtIII1111111111111II111111hII1III11111111111'111111111111111IIII111IIIIUI !'11IIIBIIN11111111111( } - SEE DOCK ELEVATION FILL IN(E)OPENINGS I SEE DOCK SECTION = W/CMU BLK, SEE DTL 1"INSULATED LOW"E.-GLASS IN I ANODIZED ALU,AiNUM FRAME -- ---_- FILL IN(E)OPENINGS y1 4"0 PIPE RAILING. I W/CMU BLK,SEE DTL.( SEE DOCK DWCS MTL STAIR,SEE STL PIPE GUARDRAIL - I DTL 1/OA 46 j SEE DTL 4/OA 45 - STL. PIPE GUARDRAIL -- SEE DTL 15/DA 42 EMI 81 III 0 u x SEE OIL 4/OA 45 $1 I= __-_-- 6"0 PIPE BOLLARD IIIIIIIII = IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII ..-- — —�IIIIIII�� Illlllli(III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII ' i \Ih� ��Ig'j°off(IIIIIIIIII M �'� ��r ��I (IIIIII\ s I �` I .pp� NORTH ELEVATION(29th STRUT) SOUTH FI RVATION(34th STREET) INDIVIDUAL ORANGE& BLUE PAINT WHITE,TYP LETTERS, MOUNTED ON (E)WALL `I I I I I I I I I I��I -_ ._.-- NEW WALL MOUNTED I LIGHT FIXTURE • 1-6" Y SEE DOCK ELEVATION 3-0- ' A f 04/05/02 PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUBMIOIAL REV DATE DESCRIPTION DIM SUBMITTAL 03/01/02 0 o O O C . CWX SERVICE CENTER FACILITY PROJECT No.50102000A (NOTE SEE HOLLOW METAL NOTE 10 OA-O7 DOOR&FRAME - - goo Sw 34Tn sT NEW RAIL AT RAMP. 1I _ ENTDx,wwSnwGTDN v STL. PIPE GUARDRAIL SEE A/DA 45 A55E55IXYS PARCEL xuMBER 3 SEE DTL 14/DA 45 NEW RAIL AT DOCK, SEE B/DA 45 1 6 CON-WAY TRANSPORTATION SERVICES,INC. R / = CO PARKLAND PLVA gMAReo MI AS20J FAR AM()St)214-5650 14 I-- suet 400 E -7t�w-- �Tr -. - - - i /BE,>I�,,.,A FA% 510)835-28B39 1- LI J 2.5 SHEET TIRE FILE NO.assies9 Elm pl., SHEET OFFICE BUILDING w "- 0A-31 B-I o EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 12/05/01 AWG 16:3U:S3e pkoF(rRee fv Files G\OK02\501020004 Renton\SharedData\xbdr22134-arch.deg • • ® COLUMN 1 I COLUMN 2 I COLUMN 3 I COLUMN 4 0 7 lSl 0 0 0 0 0 1'- I(J 100'-0•V.I,F. I I 20'-0•V.I.F. I 20'-0•V.I.F. I 20'-O•V.I.F. I 20.-0•V.I.F. I 20.-0^V.I.F. 1 LEGEND. 1 I 8• I.It 0FILL IN(E)DOOR W/(N)CMU BLOCK,SEE DTL. II I NEW GUARDRAIL SEE 3/0445 1 I NEW GUARDRAIL SEE 9L/DA45 I 0REMOVE(E)CEILING 0 REPLACE(E)RAILING WITH NEW, SEE 7 I I I 0REPLACE(E)DOOR PER DOOR SCHEDULE 1 ROLL-UP DOOR r 100•_0^ M n 4 '.1 I OS REPLACE(E)CEILING WITH NEW GYPSUM D01 (E)DOCK RAMP . O DOWN I_ n BOARD CEILING,SEE • oz I Ili T ---F---,{ `-1•- E •1 /•'-/r IS ._-_ �I LL O — NEW ITEMS /,— _ 1 „'' ,F1LOM - EXISTING TO REMAIN BREAK CURB ' ��'�„' Mal"" II O 'i ___J © ©" J z o n co GUARD RAIL 1, I2 O ® 1{I©\ r---- o (U OPENING /' 1'I � ddd f ry �k NEW RA/AP n c /1�- �____� •» —'f^ -� 11^ ® SEE 9/0A45 N K 100'-7• 1, 'DOCK LEVEL / I� r ;,� ® I I I I r I 1•�t^N II-® e.a BREAK CURB O GUARD /� J CARVERS 1__ S i RAIL OPENING /S. R n 1 ' a cE —I� - RAMP DN 1 o I , o � :3010_ 6'-0AL . ! ® ®�i... sp.2 . 100'-0^ r-. - Ali OFFICE FLOOR LEVEL -_ i. _ - _ 0.4 OD ` /•/ •♦ 4 }.,. 1 ', WIN V • ,' � • CONFERENCE O 1 - o — I ® 0 d I ♦ I ♦ ® m —I I NI m • /•/ • C 1 1 MANAGER i R .=---] ..(; xi • tri: __ _ • 4 1 1 TRASH 1 �C ® IJ _COMPACTOR/-1.;-' N 4'-0• pEy/1F�� -ilr-1jI IC�DI I .14ON ' 08 BID ® ® I ROOM - - ® 4H I1 ._.-- - - - - - - O 04/116/02 PINMFa aEPWlllplf SlanuE OW y i I, II - -- - ssnmhi DESCRIPTIONos/o/02 61 CWX SERNCE CENTER FAGUT,' PROJECT NO.Sa1020E0a 2 5_g Rao sW J41R sr At RENnXI.ruvRNo7a ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUWER a CON-WAY TRANSPORTATION SERVICES,INC. 110 PULL FLOOR PLAN ®1 ® e PROW )Mina0s203 FAA(734)214-x60 IRA1L_sir.fs^ 3 UM GRAND MC. (SRO{{6b2761 1 A MUM)CA 11612 RW 610)616 Eli NICE 1111E SE NO.Oro,642 DeN:PSI SECT OFFICE BUILDING FLOOR PLAN ,,,,-vol0A-01 wo I1. U2e': PFNavv 15 02 18:07:29 ((RefLev Files:G:\OK02\501020004 Renton\Shored0ata\Abdr22X34-arch.dwq E Looking NE along East side of property Looking SE eking East side of property ..-_'. . •- 0 _ - _ = _ - EXISTING 8'CAL. :cam > > ° . TO ICUOUSTREE lOr REMAIN- EMSTPIG SHRLES---- TO REMAIN EXISTING B"CAL. t� EXISTING 4"CAL fir+ CECIDUOISTREE DECAg1Dl1S TREE Yyj, Looking East et e�kny Pine Tins Looking Went et exhsm TO REMAIN 0 TO REMAIN- - u,tlshrubsetBuildingEney Pin,Trees rtBollcNt-EEMry �J __. _ __.._ _m ___ E%ISTNJGSHRUBS TO REMAIN '.. •a:+' -` ^ -' EXISTING 5 CAL DdSi1N(i SHRUBS OUS REE TO REMAIN -.< TO RE° TO REMAIN _.___ +• ' - ;__ _-. Look ng West at a nstkg-me Trees no M "ate ug "'g id • ° s EXISTING O TREE DECIOUOUS existing Pine trees Deudv us trees shrubs - TO REMAJN _--- ..- EMMA PATE EXISTING 74"CAL. 1— - EXISTING 7"CAL.PINE TREES - - _ - - E4WW.43 Xle6aMIP TO REMAIN(2) TOE REMAIN 1 W - r , , - - - __ EXISTING B'CAL.PINE TREE Ct k� TO BE REMOVED FOR RAMP Looking SE at existing DecMuous Trees Looting si ex_ .parlckg.+ ;Cam' ' 2�' }r TON EXISTING 5 CAL. O sk g Pone+DerJduou$trees shrubs _ _ EXISTING 70"CAL PINE TREE DECIIXIOU,STREE 111111111ii1111 } - BIMDfJ(3EMRY __.___ TO REMAIN Q--TO REMAIN 20 y _ �� _ EXISTING 6"CAL - - - .-.EXISTMIG SHRUBSEpSTTNG SHRUBS PINE TREE TO REMAIN v M TO REMAIN TO REMAIN 3 W " EXISTING 8"CAL.PINE TREES TO REMAIN(3) 5"4E- X EXISTING 12"CAL.PINE TREE `.8 n ''TO REMAIN Q -EXISTING 6"CAL _ Looking SE M existing Pure+ Looking•W et existing parking lot+ "• - EXISTING 10"CAL.PINE TREE . DECIDUOUS E Deciduous Trees eneong Denduous trees+shn.bs . TO REMAIN --7c ]L - PINE TREE TO REMAIN Z ,,.... _ . -- _ -i1 0 ___'.-`_ ° 'L4v_ TREE TO REMAIN a, - __--DEAD 5 CAL.PINE (). 1 - - I EXISTING LANDSC ``Lookup North at erosong Pine trees+shrubs at Building Entry .20 EXISTING 12"CAL. AREA TO REMAIN WATER VLT DECIDUOUS TREE TO REMAIN -SE: „� - •."-_ EXISTINGSHRUBS .."." T ti __ _ , TO REMAIN z, II — 4 b--. -- __ _•:___ ,,--,--- .: r "rr5.i, �'x '-- mi, YLV-,-"..IRWGA'n0NMETER .�_ _� .._.,_; ,w, :,..,, y..._,...;_.�7 ° . 5W0G) lime.) SEE NOTES Looking East at meting shrubs,west side of alluding LANDSCAPE NOTES: NORTIi rN..... 1.Rake,weed,prune dead wood,scarify and place 2"of a 20' II0' bark mulch in all existing planting areas on site. - ; -• - " -- --- CONWAY Grans stems.Inc. ,nm y x 2-Shut off,lock and abandon existing irrigation meter. ON YARD PLANTING PLAN(Tree Cutting Plan) o 3.Cut and cap existing irrigation mainline at meter. -- - -- ^ ,� --___ --- ---- --- - r euu vckwoao.a PEHMII St UNLY YL.-01 "o 'emu, m °"� '' --"` - -- NOT FORCONSTRUCT1ON • • i0 MU.BOX _ _,,.2 .._.....J., a a a E , H 1111 I I 11 IItin r ` ,ir,,,,,...____. _ ..a 0 2 . j \___ ' ' , , --I 1— I A D.G 1 '- • • •, I - _ ] 0.., �- LJ s 110 WI HR NOR ROT MEI MN MI 11Y1 WI WTI HR ' 4 —� 4 >_� 4 - 4 P -T 4 ,. 0 0 0 B . ® ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN IOC, SCALE: IT_50'-O• — 0 SG' FLAG NOTES THIS SHEET:0 GENERAL NOTES: ALL SITE UGHTING AND MONUMENT$101 SHALL BE ROUTED UNDERGROUND. I. EXISTING UTILITY TRANS'ORMER AND UNDERGROUND SERVICE ENTRANCE TO I. SITE UGXTNG POWER SHALL BE CONTROLLED BY PHOTOCELL ON,PHOTOCELL REAMS FOR RE-USE WIM NEW ELECTRICAL SERVICE EQUIPMENT. OFT.NTT OVERRIDE PROVIDED IN POWER UNIT PANEL•NIB.• 2 NEW UNDERGROUND CONDUITS ONE-LINE DIAGRAMFOR FUEL ISLAND ON SHEET 0E311 AND�FUEL ISLAND RR AND OF FOR REQUIREMENTS. 2.SEE STRUCTURAL PLANS FOR WAIT POLE BASE DETAIL 3.ALA/BOXES LOCATED IN PAVEMENT SHALL BE N20 LOADING TYPE. 3. REFERENCE SHEET FE01 FUEL ISLAND POSER AND UGH NG RAN FOR REQUIREMENTS A.ALL EXSTNG SITE UGITNG SHALL BE REMOVED N ITS ENTIRETY. A.NOT USED. LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE 3.YONwENT SIGN.COORDINATE LOCATION NM ARCHTECT AND OWNER. 6, SEE FUG POLE LIGHTING ON SHEET 0E01. TYPE LA CAS O I CAT.NO. DESCRIPTION VOLT MOUNTING MANUFACTURER,CAT.NUMBER 7. INSTALL NEW UGHT POLE BASES AT 2-6"BEHIND CURB. XYI AOOW IRS SINGLE R HEAD,FORWARD PRESSURE SCOUR POUF MOUNTED 480 'ARIA FGMCGRAW EDSON GIRD RTSAA3-5-FT- B. NSTIll NEW LIGHT POUF BASES AT 3'-0•BEHND C1N8. FIXTURE MM iCRWARO 1HROW DISTRIBUTION POLE TG WM YA100)AND R159A395T HY2 I •AOOW HPS DOUBLE HEAD,HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM WALL MOUNTED MO ARM MCGRAW ED5ON GU-A-4O-2-S-FT- RXTURE WM FORWARD THROW DISTRIBUTION POLE iG WITH MA1011 AND RTS9ASOSFF H01 1 250W UPS 250W HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM,WALL 277 ARM MCGRAW EDSON GU-A-10-5-FT- MOUNT,NET LOCATION LISTED WALL iG NTH YA1062 HMI 1 A00W HPS 400W HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM.TENON 277 MAST R MCGRAW EDSON GLA-91-MPS-CWA-2-A MOUNT,NET LOCATION USTED BUWHORN -FT-TG ROTH MA1007 • YY9 `u 1•'50. �• AM CITY OF PRELIMINARY ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN 04/04/2002 Ifirexte "'W + RENTON — u � Plann119018iWing/Public Work,DBPI. YE01 NO. REVSION BY DATE APPR TIa 01'01 I— I— I— N 0 0 . 0 0 0 • v --..:49:i ,. .:.• . r • :-�r��'/� am 1! © f ti t1t:f;l:l. 1"f>l:• e i = .T ICI .. ... ,:.... ... . •.. . . . ... . ... • • • • ISINIE u \\::iiiiilliiiiiiiigRJ7 /7-- ii ' —11--jj % • I 1 . .. . __. , .::.:,..„. . oiiiiiii�ii� �ii 4 0� OMR ilkilall WOMB ©MIMI! .. . .... .... r•ei T7.�� _ ar•e 1 . ® ' 0 0 0 0 �.. 0 pa," ONE UTILITY PLAN O o• _ po' .1 .15o' C SCALE 1 w 50' UTILITY KEY NOTES LEGEND: NOTES O CONTACT AND COORDINATE W/CITY OF RENTON TO CAP (E)8'FIRE Cl METAL SIGN POST COO SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE 1. SEE SHEET GC 01 FOR GENERAL WATER TAP. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL MATERIAL. CAP AND 0 ELECTRIC METER sr!,• STAND PIPE CML NOTES AND LEGEND. ABANDON(E)8"LANE TO BUILDING - COLUMN FLANGE ® JUNCTION BOX 2. SEE SHEETS YC 01 AND YC 02 FOR SURVEY. O (E)SEWER LINE 13 GAS METER -6 FIRE HYDRANT 3. SEE SHEET YC 03 FOR DEMOLITION PLAN. GAS VALVE a GATE POST 4. SEE SHEET YC 04 FOR OVERALL O INSTALL 1"DIAMETER TYPE"K"COPPER WATER SERVICE DI LINE TO FUEL ISLAND YARD HYDRANT. COI O IRRIGATION CONTROL VALVE W WATER VALVE SITE LAYOUT. ® NOT USED 0 MONITOR WELL EH WATER METER 5. SEE SHEET YC 05 FOR GRADING O POST INDICATOR VALVE Q WATER MANHOLE AND DRAINAGE PLAN. 0 INSTALL APPROXIMATELY 105 L.F.OF 4"DIAMETER PVC D-3034, X PK NAIL LB• 2.5"CAST IRON DOWNSPOUT 6. SEE SHEET YC 06 FOR UTILITY PLAN. SDR-35 SANITARY SEWER SERVICE LINE AT 2R MINIMUM SLOPE. O REBAR&CAP FOUND �p POWER TRANSFORMER 7. SEE SHEET YC 07 FOR EROSION CONNECT TO(E)6"SEWER PROVIDE(N)CLEAN OUTS AT INTERSECTION. p SCRIBED "X" CONTROL PUN. © 1,000 GAL OIL/WATER SEPARATOR. SEE MEP PLANS. ❑ CATCH BASIN 8. SEE SHEET YC 08 FOR DRAINAGE MAP. CONIFEROUS TREE 0 (E) FIRE HYDRANT. ® STORM MANHOLE 9. SEE SHEET YC 09 FOR JOINT LAYOUT PLAN. ) — * LUMINAIRE O DECIDUOUS TREE 10. SEE SHEET YE 01 FOR SITE ELECTRICAL PLAN. O NOT USED ,. WOOD SIGN POST 11. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 24 INCHES VERTICAL • IRON PIPE(FOUND) FF��jj7�� CLEARANCE AND 10 FEET HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE BETWEEN 0NOT USED ® MONUMENT IN CASE(FOUND) T///d NEW ASPHALT WATER LINES AND SANITARY SEWER LINES.WATER LINES SHALL 10 NOT USED et SOIL TEST HOLE • PASS ABOVE SEWER LINES. o SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT I'.'.'.I ASPHALT OVERLAY 12.SEE MEP PLANS FOR CONTINUATION OF SANITARY SEWER 20,000 GAL ANDERGROUND FUEL TANK. x SPOT ELEVATION LINES INSIDE THE BUILDINGS. 11 F. .•,I CONCRETE PAVEMENT 12 (E) DOMESTIC WATER LINE TO REMAIN. L •-•I ASPHALT OVERLAY 13 INSTALL 1"DIAMETER TYPE"K"COPPER WATER SERVICE LINE TO NOSE BIB,CONNECT TO(E)WATER LINE. '�_R« CITY OF CWX SERVICE CENTER FACILITY O4/os/ox ' — •. R RENTON 400 SW 34TH ST RENTON, WASHINGTON ''�— �_ .ram ® Pao ay/B Ilaln4/Pueic wodn Depl. YARD UTILITIES PLAN YC-OS N0. REVISION BY DATE APPR _ 0Y3/01422 15:1U3e7r: PrkoppXR. Files:G:\OK02\501020004 Renton\Site\xcsite — 031102.dwg G:\OK02\501020004 Renton\SharedDota\xCdr22x34—arch.tlwg , A-N N N NIA A H- -I— I 1 ° I Nz,. .Tc Tc t. . 1i2 ___ _ T : __--- --•---- -- -- -- .. , . Ems.- �- --- - ---�. -------� •-- --- •--- ----- - - ___"_ --— c--, - 1"I"I " k 6 / 21.33.TC 21.00.TP - ! —1!,j :- _ __ __ .. 1,1C 0 1 - 2t.86.TP j- ° b d ^ ' f ° - - ; •' — — i';-" 20.66. • 20.66.' ° 20 33.- 20.66.TP v._ ' / ^I IAA 11 ) IAA ) IAA CH El IAAH ) I .•... i ..,:: F. T. GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN C 6 _ `50 150' SCALE: 1"= 50' QUANTITY ESTIMATE: LEGEND: NOTES: GRADING NOTES: CUT: (EARTH TO BE DISPOSED AT CEDAR 1. SEE SHEET GC 01 FOR GENERAL 1. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL MEET THE STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS z, (E)CONTUR LINE MOUNTAIN DISPOSAL SITE) CIVIL NOTES AND LEGEND. OF THE CITY OF RENTON,WA DEMO(E) DOCK: 125'x52'x5'= 1,204 CY —2i— (N)CONTUR LINE 2. SEE SHEETS YC 01 AND YC 02 FOR SURVEY. 2. SLOPES SHALL BE MADE WITH A 3 TO 1 MAXIMUM GRADE, UNLESS NOTED FILL: (A.B.TO BE IMPORTED) 3.SEE SHEET YC 03 FOR DEMOLITION PLAN. OTHERWISE N DOCK: 125'x52'x1.5' = 361 CY 4. SEE SHEET YC 04 FOR OVERALL 3. MATCH GRADES AT EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS. E DOCK: 433'x0.08'x50' = 64 CY - SITE LAYOUT. W DOCK: 433'x0.29'x35' = 167 CY 5. SEE SHEET YC 05 FOR GRADING 4. ONE FOOT CONTOURS ARE SHOWN ON THE PAVEMENT FOR CLARITY.ALL OTHER AND DRAINAGE PLAN. CONTOURS ARE SHOWN AT TWO FOOT INTERVALS. FUEL ISLAND: 60'x22'x0.25' = 12 CY 6. SEE SHEET YC 06 FOR UTILITY PLAN. 604 CY • 7.SEE SHEET YC 07 FOR EROSION CONTROL PLAN. 8. SEE SHEET YC 08 FOR DRAINAGE MAP. 9. SEE SHEET YC 09 FOR JOINT LAYOUT PLAN. 10. SEE SHEETS YC 10 THRU YC 20 FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PLANS tam a• "��'�" CITY OF CWX SERVICE CENTER FACILITY /O6/02 RENTON 400 SW 34TH ST RENTON, WASHINGTON ,Kw Y� nV n4/Nbk worm DePE I YARD GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN YC[04 N0. REVISION er ONTE APHH ..� ! YC04.02 Deer: Prko rolex A—N N N NIA A 03/11/02 15:19:37 PRef Files: G:\OK02\501020004 Renton\Site\zceite —031102.dwg G:\OK02\501020004 Renton\SheredDate\xbdr22z34—erch.dwq , I- H- H 10 I- (E)FENCE I -10'UTILITY EASEMENT to 18' 45' 77' 60' 60' 60' 66' 105' 432.5' 11 r S.� 26 STAGING A •O 28 FT TRAILER I I f USEMENT 0-- 0 -I�U "'O1.. • II ! 1 AI 17 • 1i z SUNDEL ' ` (N)TEL 10 76 ® 2' ��71 r :---r- 1 Of7::' ISLAND � � SOUTH LINE OF 20' ,{ ..E(' wsa,r ..�aa.n.. -r,._r,� . . - /._1fpl3_\ e� ••� -�F-Y o • ^I I j WATER EASEMENT �/ H n ,Ver a�L T �11 \.\ n ��o° 1- ..-. ♦ c NEW DOCK 5•w C•' p o ^ %%A Y / 25,980 50 FT ® (E)OFFCE Q•I�. 10'WALK AND LANDSCAPE •.. + a ,, tl/d�///r�7 � � 'o 1® 25'I J 291 {fl . EASEMENT A' T ! /1✓✓✓j;, I A BUILDING I J -_ �- • - •.,.� 84' I e 28 STAOITRNLER •.: •:qqrr. _ , aoF E R BUILDING t n 23 'I •:: Hof'.. .. .. �. ....... I •..' - e1 0' i 11i4 IPI TI136• I ® 0 $ i..,_... . mI t ._ 1 MIN. m 20' RAILROAD EASEMENT 0 Co O -15'UTILITY EASEMENT (E)FENCE S DI 911 O OC' - 50' 100'50' 20'RAILROAD EASEMENT SCALE: 1 =50' LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PARKING AND LANDSCAPE DATA: SITE AREA: REQUI SITE AREA RED LANDSCAPING 392,408 S.F. BUILDING HEIGHT ALLSET BACK:NO RESTRICTIONS LOTS S AND 8 IN BLOCK 1 OF BURLINGTON NORTHERN ORILLA SIT (2%) = 7,848 S.F SITE SET BACK. INDUSTRIAL PARK RENTON DIVISION NO.1,ACCORDING TO PLAT 392,408 S.F. LANDSCAPE PROVIDED =24,346 S.F. REQUIRED 20'AT 29th STREET,40'PROVIDED RECORDED IN VOLUME 108 OF PLATS AT PAGE(S) 12 AND 13, IN TOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE REQUIRED 15'AT 34th STREET, 18'PROVIDED KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON EXISTING=343,716 S.F. ZONING: NEW=0 S.F. ZONED: I-H TOTAL PARKING AREA= 3E036 S.F. PARKING: MIN. MAX. TOTAL LOT COVERAGE = 93.8% 15,300 GROSS S.F. OFFICE 45.9 68.9 KEY NOTES: EMPLOYEE PARKING AREA= 31,565 S.F. REQUIRED PARKING LANDSCAPING = 1,578 S F 25,980 S.F. DOCK 17.3 17.3 O CONSTRUCT CONCRETE PAVEMENT. 14 INSTALL MONUMENT SIGN. SEE DETAILS 9, 10, 12 AND 14, PARKING LANDSCAPE PROVIDED =3,124 S.F. (9%) TOTAL: 63.2 86.2 SEE DETAIL 4, SHEET YC 40. SHEET YC 49. TOTAL BUILDING FOOTPRINT AREA= 43,400 S.F. PROVIDED: 65 O REMOVE SECTION OF(E)FENCE IN THIS AREA. 15 SEE STRUCTURAL PLANS FOR RAMP DETAILS. LEGEND: INSTALL(N)END POST AT SIDES OF OPENNING. 16 ACCESSIBLE PARKING. SEE DETAIL 1, SHEET YC 42. O NOT USED METAL SIGN POST coO SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE 17 INSTALL CHAIN LINK FENCE, SEE DETAIL 12, SHEET YC 47 0 ELECTRIC METER 5TP• STAND PIPE O REMOVE(E)GATE AND INSTALL CHAIN LINK FENCE 18 SEE ARCHITECTURAL AND STRUCTURAL.PLANS FOR STAIR COLUMN FLANGE ® JUNCTION BOX NOTES: • IN THIS AREA,SEE SHEET YC 47. AND ACCESSIBLE RAMP DETAILS. 5 INSTALL 4'-0"WIDE MAIN GATE. ® GAS METER a FIRE HYDRANT FOR O ^ 1. SEE SHEET CIVIL NOTES AND ILEGEND.ENERPL SEE DETAIL 5,SHEET IC 47. 19 NOT USED o GAS VALVE GATE PVAL mA o IRRIGATION CONTROL VALVE CA193 WATER VALVE 2.SEE SHEETS YC 00 FOR SURVEY. © INSTALL(N)SLIDE GATE TO ACCOMODATE(N)60'OPENING. ® MONITOR WELL ® WATER METER SEE DETAIL 8.SHEET YC 46. 20 NOT USED o POST INDICATOR VALVE WJ WATER MANHOLE 3.SEE SHEET YC 02 FOR DEMOLITION PLAN. O NOT USED 21X PK NAIL 06• 2.5"CAST IRON DOWNSPOUT 4.SEE SHEET YC 03 FOR OVERALL INSTALL LIGHT POLE BASE. SEE DETAIL 16,SHEET IC 48. SITE LAYOUT. Q (E)STORM DRAIN INLET. FOR INFORMATION SEE SHEET YC 05. SEE ELECTRICAL PLANS FOR DIMESIONS AND LOCATIONS. 0 REBAR A:CAP FOUND III POWER TRANSFORMER 5.SEE RA FOR GRADING © BUILDING OVERHANG.SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR � SCRIBED"X" T1,,�,,rJ/ AND DRAINAGE PLAN. O BUMPER.CSEE DETAIL TRACTOR TRAILER PARKING INFORMATION. 0 CATCH BASIN Y` CONIFEROUS TREE 6.SEE SHEET YC 05 FOR UTILITY PUN. © 4"WIDE YELLOW PAINTED PARKING STALL LINES.SEE © STORM MANHOLE /'� 70 REMOVE AND REPLACE(E)CURB WITH (N)TACK-ON CURB. DETAILS 1.2.5 AND 6, SHEET YC 50. 41* LUMINAIRE O DECIDUOUS TREE 7.SEE SHEET IC 06 FOR EROSION 500' E. 200'W CONTROL PLAN. ® 5'-0"WIDE YELLOW PAINTED PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY. a WOOD SIGN POST TT////))�� 8.SEE SHEET YC 08 FOR DRAINAGE MAP. 0SEE STRUCTURAL AND FUELING DRAWINGS FOR FUEL SEE DETAIL 10,SHEET YC 50. o IRON PIPE(FOUND) T///J NEW ASPHALT ISLAND LAYOUT AND UNDERGROUND FUEL STORAGE ©5 DEMOLISH (E) DOCK AND CANOPY SUPERSTRUCTURE. 81 MONUMENT IN CASE (FOUND) 9.SEE SHEET YC 09 FOR JOINT LAYOUT PLAN. TANK DETAILS. ASPHALT OVERLAY (0 SOIL TEST HOLE I.•.•.•I 10.COORDINATES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE 12 TRASH COMPACTOR (NIC). SEE MECHANICAL PLANS FOR © DEMOLISH (E) DOCK FOUNDATION. o SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT BASED UPON COORDINATES PROVIDED BY INFORMATION. r x SPOT ELEVATION I_ '; I CONCRETE PAVEMENT THE SURVEYER INCA ENGINEERING, INC 0INSTALL FLAG POLE WITH 4 - 6"DIAMETER BOLLARDS, BELLEWE,WA SEE DETAIL 4,6 AND 7,SHEET YC 48. '' (E) LANDSCAPE 12 TRASH COMPACTOR(NIC).SEE MECHANICAL PLANS FOR INFORMATION. T. ..1:CAI. � • CITY OF CWX SERVICE CENTER FACILITY ."`EA/05/0202 INSTALL FLAG POLE WITH 4 - 6"DIAMETER BOLLARDS. 400 SW 34TH ST RENTON, WASHINGTON ,....„„ ' SEE DETAIL 4,6 AND 7,SHEET YC 48. BQIAI ilIN RENTON �� Planning/Bu:IUing/Public W AI DNA. YARD LAYOUT PUN YC-03 1 NB. REVISION BY DATE APPR :JUL:, . Y/11/0G Deer: Prko rel•v A-N N N NIA A 03/11/02 15:19:37 XRef Flee:G:\OK02\501020004 Renton\Sil•\xceite -031102.d.g G:\OK02\501020004 Renton\SharedDota\xbtlr22x34-arch.d.g CWX SERVICE CENTER/LUA02-042 PARTIES OF RECORD Lloyd P. Gossett Marie Coyer John F. Krivacic 1321 S. Puget Dr., #E 2300 Benson Rd. S., #E 2300 Benson Rd. S. #B-2 Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055 425-255-5576 425-235-7801 425-271-5826 05/15/02 05/24/02 Colleen flchtner 1613 S. 27th St. Renton, WA 98055-5123 425-417-7829 MICRO!ZL Last printed 06/07/02 3:09 PM Pittii CITY _F RENTON Planning/Building/PublicWorks Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator June 24, 2002 Mr. Kit Wong TranSystems Corporation 180 Grand Avenue, Suite 400 Oakland, CA 94612 SUBJECT: CWX Service Center Project No. LUA-02-042, SA-A, ECF Dear Mr. Wong: This letter is to inform you that the appeal period has ended for the Environmental Review Committee's (ERC) Determination of Non-Significance and the Administrative Site Plan Approval for the above-referenced project. No appeals were filed. This decision is final and application for the appropriately required permits may proceed. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (425) 430-7270. Sincerely, /Z/1,/, Lesley Nishihir Senior Planner cc: Con-Way Transportation Services/Owners L. Gossett, M. Coyer, J. Krivacic, C. Fichtner/Parties of Record FINAL RENTON 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 ® AHEAD OF THE CURVE This paper contains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer King County DEVELOPMENT PLANNING Wastewater Treatment Division CITY OF RENTON Department of Natural Resources King Street Center JUN 1 7 2002 201 SouthJackson Street Seattle,WA 98104-3855 RECEIVED June 13,2002 Lesley Nishihira, Senior Planner Planning/Building/Public Works Dept. City of Rortton 1055 South Grady Way Renton,WA 98055 RE: CWX Service Center(LUA-02-042. SA-A. ECF) Dear Ms.Nishihira: The King County Wastewater Treatment Division has reviewed the May 30, 2002,Determination of Non-Significance for the CWX Service Center proposal to modify an existing dock building and construct a new building on the site. King County requires that a capacity charge be applied to any project that constructs a new connection to the sewer system,any reconnection within five years of a disconnection,or any change in use or building remodel that includes an increase in plumbing fixtures. King County generally receives notice of new construction; however, some sewer districts and/or the cities that represent them have neglected to report changes in use and tenant improvements that involve an increase in plumbing fixtures. In an attempt to remedy this problem,we are sending this reminder to you in response to the Determination of Non-Significance. We ask that you forward this reminder to the sewer district or city department responsible for Sewer Use Certification forms: Please be sure that a Non-Residential Sewer Use Certification form for the above project is completed and sent to the King County Capacity Charge Program in a timely manner. The form should be sent to Eunice Verstegen,Capacity Charge Program,KSC-NR- 0501,at the address above. If you need additional forms or have questions about the program,please call Eunice at(206)684-1740. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this proposal. Sincerely, Barbara Questad Environmental Planner cc: Eunice Verstegen, Capacity Charge Program CLEAN WATER —A SOUND INVESTMENT CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 04A' day of 076,41 , 2002, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing D2-+-t;v v,Aiv o-+)0v documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing Se-e (Signature of Sender) STATE OF WASHINGTON SS COUNTY OF KING I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that 0/tee signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: 4149 S o`�O O a �� 71) Notary Public i end for the State of Washi g n MAR N KAMCHEFF NOTARY PUBLIC Notary(Print)MARILYN KAMCHFFF STATE OF WASHINGTON My appointmV6 tDINTMENT EXPIRES:6-29-03 COMMISSION EXPIRES .It INE 29. 2003 P • - (eede C , X �vvr.r� Project Number: Ltit ,n 0 Z 6)412, 91-4/ NOTARY DOC AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING (ERC DETERMINATIONS) Dept. of Ecology Larry Fisher Mr. Rod Malcom, Fisheries Environmental Review Section WA Dpt. Of Fish &Wildlife Muckleshoot Indian Tribe PO Box 47703 C/o Dept. of Ecology 39015— 172nd Avenue SE Olympia, WA 98504-7703 3190— 160th Ave. SE Auburn, WA 98092 Bellevue, WA 98008 WSDOT Northwest Region Duwamish Tribal Office Mr. David Dietzman King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240 14235 Ambaum Blvd. SW— Front A Dept. of Natural Resources PO Box 330310 Burien, WA 98166 PO Box 47015 Seattle,WA 98133-9710 Olympia, WA 98504-7015 US Army Corp. of Engineers Ms. Shirley Marroquin Eric Swennson Seattle District Office Environmental Planning Supervisor Seattle Public Utilities PO Box C-3755 KC Wastewater Treatment Division 710 —2nd Avenue, 10th Floor Seattle,WA 98124 201 South Jackson St, MS KSC-NR-050 Seattle, WA 98104 Attn: SEPA Reviewer Seattle,WA 98104-3855 KC C ev. & Environmental Serv. City of Newcastle City of Kent Attn: SEPA Section Attn: Mr. Micheal E. Nicholson Attn: Mr. Fred Satterstrom, AICP 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Director of Community Development Acting Community Dev. Director Rent)n, WA 98055-1219 13020 SE 72nd Place 220 Fourth Avenue South Newcastle, WA 98059 Kent, WA 98032-5895 Gary Kriedt Joe Jainga Meter Environmental Planning PSE— Municipal Land Planner KSC TR-0431 PO Box 90868 201 South Jackson Street Ms: XRD-01W Seattle, WA 98104 Bellevue, WA 98009-0868 Last printed 11/19/01 11:34 AM CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the Z9 day of /1/1 Ot , 2002, I deposited in the mails of the United St es, a sealed envelope containing (, ( 'vi Lk) terelmir1 . LIA Dec.Wart documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing �09� P• Goss P. 0. . �G✓� e Cov ( P• b• . Con - t4pCiv ti,1/\5po✓4-- IIOrgySeroz 6/4)4.2 GtoSuIs1.P S 61/1201 te,41. _A pet' ca yt-F (Signature of Sender) STATE OF WASHINGTON SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Al11.6 1/2.Q- De-56:4.l46J signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: 5 Zc o 2- MA,RILYN KAMCHEFF Notary Public • and for the State of Wal liington NOTARY PUBLIC Notary (Prin KAMCHEFF STATE OF WASHINGTON My appoint • ENT EXPIRES:6-29-03 I COMMISSION EXPIRES " JUNE 29, 2003 Project Name: W SVv U Le. &AA::4c. Project Number: (AA ► (92" Oci Z ) S) )- l� CCF NOTARY DOC NOT10E ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION CWX SERVICE CENTER LUA-02-042,SA-A,ECF The applicant la requesting Environmental(SEPA)end Administrative Site Plan review for proposed modifications to the existing Con-way Transportation Services CWX Service Center. Location:400 SW 30 Street THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of either the environmental determination]RCW 43.21.0076(3),WAC 197-11480]and/or the land use decision must be filed In writing on or before 5:00 PM June 17,2002. II no appeals are Rind by this date,both actions will become finaL Apposite must be flied In writing together with the required$75.00 application the with: Hearing Examiner,City o1 Renton,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA e6065. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 441.110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office,(425)430.6510. s • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION,PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON,DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT(425)430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please Include the project NUMBER When calling for proper file IdentifIcatIon. MARILYN KAMCHEFF NOTARY PUBLIC CERTIFICATION STATE OF WASHINGTON COMMISSION EXPIRES JUNE 29, 2003 I, €. U ( , hereby certify that copies of the above document were posted by me in conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on N U•1 Z_P.Cl Z Signedtate �d�2C4 ATTEST:Subscrib d swom before me,a Notary Public,in and for of lJ� Washington residing;f ,on the 5'` day of0 a' • MARILYN KAMCHEFF MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES:6-29-03 1 eii 11 j \.1 tim' ,....ingio ra ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION CWX SERVICE CENTER LUA-({2-042,SA-A,ECF The applicant Is requesting Environmental (SEPA) and Administrative Site Plan review for propos ed modifications to the existing Con-way Transportation Services CWX Service Center. Locatk in: 400 SW 34th Street. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMI NT. Appeals of ell her the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed In writing on or before 5:00 PM June 17,2002. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed In writing together with the required$75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may tie obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office,(425)430-6510. . 600W..*ao-aa-a RENTON©. '!__ 41,.1 — 1 —.-_[ t-.._ ® ..v.. l[v— ' ® 0 -- II e `er I , C mu A C[ III N II [I. 1 1 -.-I.. B iP . . OQ PY I .r�.. y IIIi , , ,, • -(I p ,N j I5N I. 1 1 II 1 l . , . f �ii, _ o: 11 1� Ii. al W ,,a E 11 C l i s" •i f'1 U!fl� E 11 :. 1 yy • 1 I1: 1„.„ ii,ji t 11< I, • 0. F ;., , , gikr I.,. I - yi{ ° 1 c c r ' toi m n 2 ■ Y L I N O T O N ri p • 1 • _ PITNERN - _.i ' ' ' 1 0 ili FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT(425)430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION ru=DIE ase include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. I NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee has issued a Determination of Non-Significance for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. CWX SERVICE CENTER LUA-02-042,SA-A,ECF Proposed modifications to existing Con-way Transportation Services CWX Service Center. Location: 400 SW 34th St. Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM June 17, 2002. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430- 6510 Publication Date: June 3, 2002 Account No. 51067 dnspub •rsi�• �` CITY ( RENTON ..� Planning/Building/PublicWorks Depaitiuent Jesse Ta 7ner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator May 30, 2002 Wathington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Sub ect: Environmental Determinations Trar smitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on May 28, 2002: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE CWX SERVICE CENTER LUA-02-042,SA-A,ECF The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) and Administrative Site Plan review for proposed modifications to the existing Con-way Transportation Services CWX Service Center. Location: 400 SW 34th Street. Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or the lanc use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM June 17, 2002. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 app ication fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional info mation regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430- 651 ) If yc u have questions, please call me at (425) 430-7270. For :he Environmental Review Committee, 6:3' / Lesley Nishihira Senior Planner cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division Larry Fisher, Department of Fisheries David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources WSDOT, Northwest Region Duwamish Tribal Office Rod Malcom, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (Ordinance) US Army Corp. of Engineers Enc osure 1055 South Grad Way-Renton,Washington 98055 R E N T O N Agen:yLetter\ ,� AHEAD OF THE CURVE •..t This paper contains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE APPLICATION NUMBER: LUA-02-042, SA-A, ECF APPLICANT: TranSystems Corporation PROJECT NAME: CWX Service Center DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) and Administrative Site Plan review for proposed modifications to the existing Con-way Transportation Services CWX Service Center. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 400 SW 34th Street LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section This Determination of Non-Significance is issued under WAC 197-11-340. Because other agencies of jurisdiction may be involved,the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fourteen (14)days. Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM June 17, 2002. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required$75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: June 3, 2002 DATE OF DECISION: May 28, 2002 SIGNATURES: a i gma d inistrat r DATE/ //CYL DepartmPI nning/Building/Public Works J .i-cs4.... hepherd, minist for DA E 292- mmunity Services Department A �� i ',////2 hief DATE Renton Fire Department dnssignature CITY (_ RENTON ..LL Planning/Building/PublicWorks Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator May 30,2002 • 3 p��z Mr. <it Wong r7 Trai(Systems Corporation 180 Grand Avenue, Suite 400 • Oak land, CA 94612 SUBJECT: CWX Service Center Project No. LUA-02-042, SA-A, ECF Dear Mr.Wong: This letter is written on behalf of the,er*ironmenfal Review Comm ittee (ERC) and is to inform you that they have completed their review orthe environmental impacts of'I be above-referenced project. The Committee, on May 28, 2002, decided that your project will be issued aetermination of Non-Significance (DN 3). The City of Renton ERC has determined that it,dces not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Staternept (EIS) is,-not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made by the ERC under,the 1dt G`Section 4�5-6,`Renton Municipal Code, after reviow of a completed environmental checklist end other Information, on file with the lead agency. This info oration is available to the public on requests The Site Plan for the CWX Service Center"is approved without;;t Drtdi ions.'' Appals of either the environmental.,deferminatign'{ACW 43, 1 C07S(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or the lanc use decision must be filed in writing,on or before 5:00 PM June 17, 2002. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed fh writing together with the required$75.00 app ication fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430- 651 ). If the Environmental Determination is appealed, a public hearing date will be set and all parties note ied. If yc u have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at(425) 430-7270. For the Environmental Review Committee, /;I Les ey Nishihir Senor Planner cc: Con-Way Transportation Services/Owners L. Gossett/Party of Record mist(tier RENTON 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 ®This paper reAHEAD OF THE CURVE p pe cycled material,30%postconsumer CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE APPLICATION NUMBER: LUA-02-042, SA-A, ECF APPLICANT: TranSystems Corporation PROJECT NAME: CWX Service Center DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) and Administrative Site Plan review for proposed modifications to the existing Con-way Transportation Services CWX Service Center. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 400 SW 34th Street LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section This Determination of Non-Significance is issued under WAC 197-11-340. Because other agencies of jurisdiction may be involved, the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fourteen (14) days. Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM June 17, 2002. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: June 3, 2002 DATE OF DECISION: May 28, 2002 SIGNATURES: /Z1/ regg Zi ma dMinistrat r DATE Departm t f PI nning/Building/Public Works J hepherd, minist tor DA E mmunity Services Department o Le eeler, ire Chief DATE Renton Fire Department dnssignature ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING NOTICE MAY 28, 2002 To: Gregg Zimmerman, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator Jim Shepherd, Community Services Administrator Lee Wheeler, Fire Chief From: Jennifer Henning, Development Planning Meeting [fate: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 Time: 9:00 AM Location: Sixth Floor Conference Room #620 Agenda li:rted below. ti Johnson-Loken(Sienna)Plat (Fiala) LUA-01-122,ECF,PP Conner Hon les proposed a 62 lot, detached single family home, subdivision on 16.13 acres. The project was processed for environmental review, preliminary plat approval and administrative approval of a reduced public street right-of-way. A portion of the off-site improvements include storm water conveyance improvements in unincorporated King County, down 144th Aveni.e SE (Jericho Avenue), approximately 570 feet to an existing culvert which flows west. This storm drainage design was done in part to reduce and minimize potential drainage impacts to an area which had existing drainage problems. This section of 144th Avenue SE is in a pending annexation area into the City of Renton. Earlier this year, the annexation-by-petition process was ruled unconstitutional by a court decision.This has stalled pending annexation actions across the state. Due to that decision, all annexations by the petition method currently being processed by the City of Renton, including the Wofford and Maplewood Heights annexations, are stalled. Specifically these two annexations were required for the City to control the full scope of construction actions and permits, including the utility permits in the utility rights-of-wa/. This addendum addresses this new information about the proposal, but does not substantially change the analysis of :significant impacts and alternatives in the existing environmental document; the DNS-M issued November 27, 2001, by the City of Renton ERC. Location: Jericho Ave. NE & NE 2 Street. CWX Servi,.e Center (Nishihira) LUA-02-042,SA-A,ECF The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) and Administrative Site Plan review for proposed modifications to the existing Con-way Transportation Services CWX Service Center. The project includes the demolition of the existing dock building and partial demolition of the raised dock for the construction of a new platform and 25,980 square foot building on the site. In addition, a new 2,040 square foot fuel island with an underground fuel tank would be created. A modification from the miiimum required 100-foot loading clearance area has been requested in order to provide 90.5 feet of clear maneuverin j area for truck trailers. Project construction is anticipated to be completed by December of 2002. Location: 400 SW 34t Street. Nelsen Mic die School Portable Classrooms (Nishihira) LUA-02-041,SA-A,ECF The applica it is requesting Environmental (SEPA) and Administrative Site Plan review for the replacement of 4 existing portable classroom buildings with four larger portable structures. The proposed portables would total 7,192 square feet (1,792 square feet each). Earthwork activities are estimated at 50 cubic yards of excavation to be utilized on-site. In addition, the removal of one 15-inch diameter pine tree would be necessary. No other modifications to the site are proposed. Project construction is anticipated to be completed by August of 2002. Location: 2403 Jones Avenue South. cc: J.Tr.nner,Mayor J.C `vington,Chief Administrative Officer S.Carlson, EDNSP Administrator A Pi 3tsch,EDNSP Director® J.G ay,Fire Prevention N.V atts,P/B/PW Develpment Services Director ® F.K iufman,Hearing Examiner L. R ide,Fire Prevention ® J.M 3dzegian,Council S.N eyer,PB/PW Transportation Systems Director R.L nd,Economic Development L.1A arren,City Attorney REPORT City of Renton & Department of Planning/Building/Public Works DECISION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW& ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION DECISION DATE: May 28, 2002 Project Name: CWX Service Center Applicant: TranSystems Corporation Owner: Con-Way Transportation Services File Number: LUA-02-042, ECF, SA-A Project Manager: Lesley Nishihira Project Description: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) and Administrative Site Plan review for proposed modifications to the existing Con-way Transportation Services CWX Service Center. Project Location: 400 SW 34th Street Exist. Bldg. Area SF: 48,720 sf Proposed New Bldg. Area SF: 27,990 sf (31,720 sf to be demolished) Site Area: 392,420 sf Total Building Area SF: 44,990 sf CONCURRENCE DATE 125 'CZ- NAME INITIA DADA .1� III[i{1J. • 2 ff✓ k )528vL Project Location Map saerc rpt REPORT City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works DECISION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW& ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION DECISION DATE: May 28, 2002 Project Name: CWX Service Center Applicant: TranSystems Corporation Owner: Con-Way Transportation Services File Number: LUA-02-042, ECF, SA-A Project Manager: Lesley Nishihira Project Description: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) and Administrative Site Plan review for proposed modifications to the existing Con-way Transportation Services CWX Service Center. Project Location: 400 SW 34th Street Exist. Bldg. Area SF: 48,720 sf Proposed New Bldg. Area SF: 27,990 sf (31,720 sf to be demolished) Site Area: 392,420 sf Total Building Area SF: 44,990 sf it •ar C NN MCC PARK II gam* I • • , o 0 '/D . ,,,t VT11 ST. ii I I I s II • Ju R li,Pi , IIII 1 IJ '' + g rif ii K 61 I O •f W IF �� I F 1 W 7, AST R. I. � ' II : 1 1 Z 111 •y � I. I z 1 yIC 4 I 1 It ' z 11., . ' '11 0. III J { I- I CC u )< . J 1 . i f K • I i I ' . �• P . _ • U L 1 N i T O N o / 0 ft/ 7 N - N T M [ N N Project Location Map saerc rpt - ... » et -- City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval& Environn I Review Committee Staff Report CWX SERVICE CENTER LUA-02-042, ECF, SA-A REPORT AND DECISION OF MAY 28,2002 Page 2 of 6 PART ONE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) and Administrative Site Plan review for proposed modifications to the existing Con-way Transportation Services CWX Service Center. The project includes the demolition of the existing dock building and partial demolition of the raised dock for the construction of a new platform and 25,980 square foot building on the site. In addition, a new 2,040 square foot fuel island with an underground fuel tank would be created. A modification from the minimum required 100-foot loading clearance area has been requested in order to provide 90.5 feet of clear maneuvering area for truck trailers. Project construction is anticipated to be completed by December of 2002. PART TWO: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW In compliance with RCW 43.21 C.240, the following project environmental review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. A. Environmental Impacts The proposal was circulated and reviewed by various City Departments and Divisions to determine whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed development. In compliance with RCW 43.21 C. 240, the following project environmental review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. The analysis of the proposal did not reveal any adverse environmental impacts requiring mitigation above and beyond existing code provisions. Furthermore, the project will not result in an increase in building area or in traffic trips; therefore, Fire and Traffic Mitigation Fees are not applicable to the proposal. B. Recommendation Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINATION OF DETERMINATION OF XX NON-SIGNIFICANCE NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED. XX Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS-M with 14 day Appeal Period. PART THREE: ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION - REPORT & DECISION This decision on the administrative land use action is made concurrently with the environmental determination. A. Type of Land Use Action XX Site Plan Review Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Conditional Use Binding Site Plan Special Permit for Grade& Fill Administrative Code Determination B. Exhibits The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing: application, proof of posting and publication, environmental review and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No. 2: Drawing No. YC-03, Site Plan (Received April 9, 2002). Exhibit No. 3: Drawing No. OA-31, Building Elevations (Received April 9, 2002). Exhibit No. 4: Drawing No. DA-31, Dock Elevations (Received April 9, 2002). Exhibit No. 5: Drawing No. FA-31, Fuel Island Elevations (Received April 9, 2002). Exhibit No. 6: Page H3-W, City of Renton Zoning Map. saerc rpt City of Renton P/B/PW Department administrative Site Plan Approval& Environn I Review Committee Staff Report CWX SERVICE CENTER LUA-02-042, ECF, SA-A REPORT AND DECISION OF MAY 28,2002 Page 3 of 6 C. Consistency with Site Plan Criteria In reviewing the proposal with respect to the Site Plan Approval Criteria set forth in Section 4-9-200 of the Site Plan Ordinance, the following issues have been identified by City Departmental Reviewers and Divisional Reviewers: 1. Conformance with the comprehensive plan, its elements and policies; The site is designated Employment Area—Valley(EAV) on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. The EAV designation is intended to provide for a mix of employment-based uses, including commercial, office and industrial development to support the economic growth of the City. The existing use of the site as a trucking terminal, and therefore, the proposed expansion of the facility, is consistent with the EAV designation. 2. Conformance with existing land use regulations; The subject site is zoned Heavy Industrial (IH) on the City's Zoning Map. Truck terminals and associated warehousing are considered a primary permitted use in this zone. The project's compliance with the pertinent development standards of the both IH zone and the parking regulations is discussed below: Setbacks: The IH zone requires a minimum setback of 20 feet from arterial street frontages, 15 feet from non- arterial street frontages and no setbacks for rear or interior side yards. The proposed fuel island canopy and dock cover building comply with the required 15-foot setback from both the SW 29th Street and SW 34th Street frontages. No modifications to the existing landscaping along property lines are proposed. Parking: The parking regulations base the amount of required on-site parking spaces on the floor area dedicated to specific uses. For the subject proposal, the following parking ratio would be applicable: • a minimum of 3 to a maximum of 4.5 spaces for every 1,000 square feet of office use. Based on this requirement, a minimum of 46 to a maximum of 69 spaces would be required for the site. The project would not alter the existing parking layout for the site, which includes 65 spaces. Loading Areas: A minimum clear maneuvering area of 100 feet is required for all dock high loading areas. Similar to present conditions, the proposal would have dock high loading areas on both the east and west sides of the dock building. As proposed, a distance of 112 feet would be provided for the east side docks and a distance of 90 feet would be provided for the west side docks. Presently, the west side dock area provides a substandard maneuvering area of 95 feet. Although the proposed west side dock area does not comply with the required loading clearance area, the necessary design of the site plan precludes the project's ability to provide the required 100-foot distance. The applicant has provided justification for a reduced maneuvering area, including the fact that the size of a typical truck trailer at a cross dock facility of this type and size would be 28 feet in length while the code provision is intended for truck trailers of 40 feet in length. Based on the smaller size of the truck trailers utilized on the site, the 90-foot loading area would be sufficient for turning and maneuvering of trucks on-site. The parking regulations allow for the reviewing official to grant modifications to parking and loading requirements when the situation has been found to meet the intent of the regulations and not present adverse impacts to the site or adjacent properties. The reduced loading area as proposed by the applicant appears to conform to the intent and purpose of the regulations and would not result in adverse impacts to the site or properties in the vicinity. Furthermore, the proposed reduction would not significantly alter the existing substandard situation. 3. Mitigation of impacts to surrounding properties and uses; The proposed addition will not adversely impact surrounding properties and uses. Potential impacts to surrounding properties will be minimal considering the site is currently utilized as a trucking transfer terminal. Potential short-term noise and traffic impacts would result from the initial construction of the project. Existing code provisions that limit construction work hours, and the applicant's construction mitigation plan, which indicates proposed work hours from 7:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, would mitigate these impacts. 4. Mitigation of impacts of the proposed site plan to the site; saerc rpt City of Renton P/B/PW Department administrative Site Plan Approval& Environs I Review Committee Staff Report CWX SERVICE CENTER LUA-02-042,ECF, SA-A REPORT AND DECISION OF MAY 28,2002 Page 4 of 6 Minor grading activities would be necessary for project construction. The proposal is not expected to adversely impact the site. As indicated in the applicant's construction mitigation description, best management practices would be used to reduce erosion and sedimentation impacts to the site. 5. Conservation of area-wide property values; The proposal would allow for the existing facility to modify the site so that it is suitable for its present and intended future use of the property. The project is anticipated to conserve property values in the vicinity. 6. Safety and efficiency of vehicle and pedestrian circulation; No new driveways or revisions to the existing parking area would be included with the proposal. However, the applicant has requested a modification from the minimum required 100-foot dock loading area to 90 feet for the west side of the dock building. As previously discussed, the reduction of this area would not result in any adverse impacts to the site and, as the applicant contends, is sufficient for the operation of the facility. 7. Provision of adequate light and air; The proposed modifications to site currently appear to provide adequate light and air circulation. 8. Mitigation of noise, odors and other harmful or unhealthy conditions; It is anticipated that minimal noise and odor impacts would result from the initial construction of the site. These short-term impacts would be mitigated by the applicant's construction mitigation plan. The proposed development would not generate any harmful or unhealthy conditions. Noise impacts associated with increased traffic and activities resulting from the completed project would not increase above existing conditions. 9. Availability of public services and facilities to accommodate the proposed use;and There are currently adequate and available public services and facilities to accommodate the existing use of the site. Specifically, there are existing 12-inch water mains located in SW 34th Street, SW 29th Street, within a City held easement at eastside of the site, as well as an existing 10-inch water main located in a City held easement on the westside of the site. There are also existing 8-inch sanitary sewer mains located in SW 29th street and SW 34th Street. The site is served by existing storm drainage mains located in SW 34th street and SW 29th street. Existing street improvements meet City codes and standards. The proposal is not anticipated to significantly alter the demands for such services or facilities. 10. Prevention of neighborhood deterioration and blight. The proposal will serve to prevent neighborhood deterioration and blight by improving an existing development. XX Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. D. Findings, Conclusions & Decision Having reviewed the written record in the matter, the City now enters the following: 1. Request: The Applicant has requested Environmental Review and Site Plan Approval for the CWX Service Center, File No. LUA-02-042, ECF, SA-A. 2. Environmental Review: The applicant's file containing the application, State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation, the comments from various City departments, the public notices requesting citizen comment, and other pertinent documents was entered as Exhibit No. 1. 3. Site Plan Review: The applicant's site plan application complies with the requirements for information for site plan review. The applicant's site plan and other project drawings are entered as Exhibits No. 2 through 6. 4. Comprehensive Plan: The subject proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Employment Area—Valley(EAV). saerc rpt City of Renton P/B/PW Department Idministrative Site Plan Approval& Environn I Review Committee Staff Report CWX SERVICE CENTER LUA-02-042,ECF, SA-A REPORT AND DECISION OF MAY 28,2002 Page 5 of 6 5. Zoning: The Site Plan as presented, complies with the zoning requirements and development standards of the Heavy Industrial (IH) zoning designation, provided all advisory notes and conditions of approval, if any, are complied with. 6. Existing Land Use: Land uses surrounding the subject site include industrial and warehouse uses within IH designated properties to the north, south, east and west. E. Conclusions 1. The subject proposal complies with the policies and codes of the City of Renton. 2. The proposal complies with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Employment Area—Valley (EAV); and the Zoning designation of Heavy Industrial (IH). F. Decision The Site Plan for the CWX Service Center, File No. LUA-02-042, ECF, SA-A, is approved. EFFECTIVE DATE OF DECISION ON LAND USE ACTION: SIGNATURES: jej,d oct/A 5/01/0Z Neil Watts, Development Services Director date TRANSMITTED this 3'd day of June,2002 to the applicant and owner: Con-way Transportation Services(owner) 110 Parkland Plaza Ann Arbor, MI 48103 TranSystems Corporation(applicant) Kit Wong 180 Grand Avenue, Suite 400 Oakland,CA 94612 TRANSMITTED this 3ro day of June,2002 to the following: Larry Meckling,Building Official L. Rude, Fire Marshal Neil Watts,Public Works Division Lawrence J.Warren,City Attorney South County Journal saerc rpt • City of Renton P/B/PW Department Idministrative Site Plan Approval& Environn I Review Committee Staff Report CWX SERVICE CENTER LUA-02-042, ECF, SA-A REPORT AND DECISION OF MAY 28,2002 Page 6 of 6 Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Fire Prevention 1. The project will not result in an increase in building area; therefore, a Fire Mitigation Fee is not required. 2. Existing hydrants are sufficient for this project. Stortz fittings are required to be installed on the existing hydrants if they are not already installed on them. 3. Separate plans and permits are required for the sprinkler modifications, additional and fire alarm system. 4. Separate plans and permits are required for the installation of the new fuel tanks and monitoring systems. 5. Fire Department access roadways are required to be within 150 feet of all portions of the building's exterior. Roadways are required at a minimum of 20 feet in width with an inside turning radius of 25 feet and outside radius of 45 feet. 6. Please provide a list of the flammable, combustible liquids and any hazardous chemicals to be used or stored on the site. Plan Review—Water 1. The new water main, existing fire hydrants, and fire control system must meet fire flow and current fire codes/regulations pursuant to Fire Department requirements. 2. Any new or existing fire hydrants used to protect the site will require a quick connect (Stortz type) fitting on the main port. 3. Water System Development Charges may be required on the site if not previously paid. Plan Review—Sanitary Sewer 1. The proposed fuel island will require a drainage system to collect surface water or spillage from the concrete pad to an oil/water separator and the sewer connection point. 2. The size of the oil/water separator must be able to contain any fuel spilled on the pad surface and pad wash down. 3. The concrete pad area will require a roof or canopy cover. Plan Review—Surface Water 1. The project will not add any new impervious surface to the site. Therefore, no additional drainage system improvements will be required. 2. No Surface Water System Development Charges will be required. 3. Temporary Erosion Control shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project. 4. All existing storm drainage facilities shall be protected from silt and mud for the duration of construction activities. Plan Review—Transportation 1. An acceptable traffic study was submitted with the application. No new vehicle trips will be added to the site; therefore, no Traffic Mitigation Fees will be required. 2. A construction plan indicating haul routes and hours, construction hours and a traffic control plan shall be finalized for approval prior to any permit being issued. Haul hours shall be restricted to 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. unless approved in advance by the Development Services Division. Plan Review—General 1. All plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. 2. A construction permit is required. When plans are complete, three copies of the drawings, two copies of the drainage report, a construction estimate, application and appropriate fee shall be submitted to the sixth floor counter. Environmental Determination and Land Use Decision Appeal Process Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM June 17, 2002. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required$75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. saerc rpt � '° I \ (E)FENCE N r 10'UTILITY EASEMENT • !n 18' 45' 77' I 1- -, I 60' 1 60• I 66' I 105' 432.5' wwww404. a �TOaH'H.� tlE •'.d531111i/„„; yILn� dag'.EEO 20'UI1LRY 'n. .6=]•:: .. ..r'f: ey-• �� '� ,.. ... r;..r_..�•2 C44f 28 FT �' I I I f SENT - ---I�- y 0 STAGING t I cv 25 e• 0 -4 I- `17j 4,.... gl 4.S STAGING _ Cam_ r �' IS FUEL I () 10' .Br l�1T z C �r .' .C,. .16 ® .42 Gm" ISLAND r. 'y •. 0 0 15lANDLL o •' SOUTH UNE OF 20• 1: i.. 1•'-ri.!i... 4?i•"' ^r-:-i.4 .`� ;_+.� I L{p1� \ WATER EASEMENT0 .. �.m.aw. � �Tq•,.,,tt • j. %%%% j%% $ ® �kV25 ® rr all 10'WALK AND LANDSCAPE ) I C' c eT /��A A+// 25,980 50 NAIV KFT (E)OFFICE r. EASEMENT _- "I T 1J 1 V I Al%%// .._ _. BUILDING -JJ28TRNtER //6l ^! tY^>ra� •-Yo _ a F • I' (E) t rxr �VABe ::a. �� ``ll L �� • 1. *ir .r. y BUILDING i j 1 ne CFNCP .(�• ...' .`v .. ...f .. .. "®•` ,s, �.... � � a� �� i ' � + 0 23 _.4.:::::::::::::::. •13. X $ t.. 1 iL4 t iM1LwTBF• Cam'®i.�. 7 �- 20'RAILROAD EASEMENT ti :,... 10 -15•UTILITY EASEMENT (E)FENCE SQF.f)A O C - 0' 10�50' 20'RAILROAD EASEMENT SCALE: 1 -SO' LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PARKING AND LANDSCAPE DATA; 5(TF ARFo' TOTAL SITE AREA- 392,408 S.F. BUILDING HEIGHT AWSET BACK: NO RESTRICTIONS LOTS 5 AND 8 IN BLOCK 1 OF BURLINGTON NORTHERN ORILLA REQUIRED LANDSCAPING(2%) -7.848 S.F. SITE SET BACK: INDUSTRIAL PARK RENTON DMSION NO.1,ACCORDING TO PLAT 392,408 S.F. LANDSCAPE PROVIDED- 24,346 S.F. REQUIRED 20'AT 29th STREET.40'PROVIDED RECORDED IN VOLUME 108 OF PLATS AT PAGE(S) 12 AND 13,IN TOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE REQUIRED 15'AT 34th STREET. 18'PROVIDED KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON EXISTING-343,716 S.F. ZONING: NEW-0 S.F. ZONED: I-H TOTAL PARKING AREA- 30L636 S.F. PARKING: MIN. MAX. KEY NOTES- EMPLOYEE PARKING AREAAL LOT COVERAGE=93 31,565 S.F. 15,300 GROSS S.F.OFFICE 45.9 68.9 REQUIRED PARKING LANDSCAPING- 1,578 S.F. 25,980 S.F.DOCK 17.3 17.3 0 CONSTRUCT CONCRETE PAVEMENT. 14 INSTALL MONUMENT SIGN. SEE DETAILS 9, 10, 12 AND 14, PARKING LANDSCAPE PROVIDED- 3,124 S.F. (914) TOTAL: 63.2 86.2 SEE DETAIL 4,SHEET YC 40. SHEET YC 49. TOTAL BUILDING FOOTPRINT AREA- 43,400 S.F. PROVIDED: 65 O REMOVE SECTION OF((E)FENCE IN THIS AREA 15 SEE STRUCTURAL PLANS FOR RAMP DETAILS. LEGEND: INSTALL(N)END POSE AT SIDES OF OPENNINC. 16 ACCESSIBLE PARKING.SEE DETAIL 1,SHEET YC 42. O NOT USED C{ METAL SIGN POST 030 SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE ' 17 INSTALL CHAIN LINK FENCE,SEE DETAIL 12,SHEET YC 47 0 ELECTRIC METER slP• STAND PIPE 0 REMOVE(E)GATE AND INSTALL CHAIN LINK FENCE 8 SEE ARCHITECTURAL AND STRUCTURAL PLANS FOR STAIR • COLUMN FLANGE ® JUNCTION BOX NOTES. IN THIS AREA,SEE SHEET YC 47. AND ACCESSIBLE RAMP DETAILS. 13 GAS METER 45- FIRE HYDRANT OS INSTALL 4'-0•WIDE MAIN GATE. ill GAS SEE SHEET GC SI FOR GENERAL GAS VALVE • GATE POST CML NOTES AND LEGEND. SEE DETAIL 5,SHEET YC 47. 19 NOT USED XY D IRRIGATION CONTROL VALVE D4 WATER VALVE O INSTALL(N)SLIDE GATE TO ACCOMODATE(N)60'OPENING, 2. SEE SHEETS YC 00 FOR SURVEY. SEE DETAIL 8, SHEET YC 46. ©0 O MONITOR WELL ® WATER METER NOT USED 3.SEE SHEET YC 02 FOR DEMOLITION PLAN. O0 POST INDICATOR VALVE alWATER MANHOLE 4.SEE SHEET YC 03 FOR OVERALL NO7 USED ©1 INSTALL LIGHT POLE BASE.SEE DETAIL 16,SHEET YC 48. X PK NAIL 05• 2.5•CAST IRON DOWNSPOUT SITE LAYOUT. ® (E)STORM DRAIN INLET. FOR INFORMATION SEE SHEET YC 05. SEE ELECTRICAL PLANS FOR DIMESIONS AND LOCATIONS. O REBAR&CAP FOUND Ei POWER TRANSFORMER 5.SEE SHEET YC 04 FOR GRADING © BUILDING OVERHANG.SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR A SCRIBED*X. �,,/ AND DRAINAGE PLAN. O CONSTRUCT 1'-0"TRACTOR AND TRAILER PARKING INFORMATION. 0 CATCH BASIN .{_r CONIFEROUS TREE 6. SEE SHEET YC 05 FOR UTILITY PLAN. BUMPER.SEE DETAIL 1,SHEET YC 43. ® 4•WIDE YELLOW PAINTED PARKING STALL UNES.SEE 0 STORM MANHOLE Yam` 10 REMOVE MID REPLACE(E)CURB WITH(N)TACK-ON CURB. DETAILS 1,2,5 AND 6,SHEET YC 50. 3. LUMINAIRE 0 DECIDUOUS TREE 7.SEE SHEET YC 06 FOR EROSION 500' E,200'W CONTROL PLAN. ©4 5'-0•WIDE YELLOW PAINTED PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY. ,, WOOD SIGN POST FF/)J/JJ�� 0SEE STRUCTURAL AND FUEUNG DRAWINGS FOR FUEL" SEE DETAIL 10,SHEET YC 50. a IRON PIPE(FOUND) T///J NEW ASPHALT 8.SEE SHEET YC 08 FOR DRAINAGE MAP. ISLAND LAYOUT AND UNDERGROUND FUEL STORAGE DEMOLISH(E)DOCK AND CANOPY SUPERSTRUCTURE. TANK DETAILS. © 8) MONUMENT IN CASE(FOUND) 9.SEE SHEET YC 09 FOR JOINT LAYOUT PLAN. ® SOIL TEST HOLE I.•.•.-I ASPHALT OVERLAY 10.COORDINATES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE 12 TRASH COMPACTOR(NIC).SEE MECHANICAL PLANS FOR © DEMOLISH(E)DOCK FOUNDATION. o SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT . , BASED UPON COORDINATES PROVIDED BY INFORMATION. CONCRETE PAVEMENT THE SURVEYER INCA ENGINEERING,INC 0INSTALL FLAG POLE WITH 4- 6'DIAMETER BOLLARDS, h SPOT ELEVATION BELIEWE.WA SEE DETAIL 4,6 AND 7,SHEET YC 48. • (E)LANDSCAPE 12 TRASH COMPACTOR(NIC).SEE MECHANICAL PLANS FOR INFORMATION. r ��ra. £ CITY OF CWX SERVICE CENTER FACILITY ..04/05/020 INSTALL FLAG POLE WITH 4-6•DIAMETER BOLLARDS. II. 400 SW 34TH ST RENTON. WASHINGTON '•�.. i SEE DETAIL 4,6 AND 7,SHEET YC 48. i ;) = RENTON i I� p4 �-•+ro/ •6/► Works�. YARD LAYOUT PLAN YC-03 II0. REVISION BY DATE APPR •� -n- - 0YC04wC I51U37. prpRroe Files:G:\0K02\501020004 Renton\Sits\hullo-031102.dwg G:\OK02\501020004 Renton\ShoredData\.twn2.34-aroh.d.9 A-N N N NIA A • COLUMN I I COLUMN 2 I COLUMN 3 I COLUMN♦ I Jv+6120 K ___. t /(E)AND(N)ROOFTOP UNITS Y "�(E)RAIL TO REMAIN 4+52.25 iillJlllljlllblll111,[ 111[[(iljli 111111 Merl I�IIII(I[II►l 1 ►II11]lll ll(Illp[Ill►llll►Illl►lljI1Ii 111�' ...... . I 7 (E)UNPAINTED CONCRETE WALLS. � TO REMNN,TYP. ` TA (El HOLLOW METAL 1'INSULATED LOW •E'GLASS N \\\ DOOR&FRAME ANODIZED ALUMINUM FRAME A 0 - 4 25 BL IIIIII111111111111p1�� ; 1111111111111 Ni"U11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111IIIII FIN. FLoaR2 .4 -� 4 FIN. FLOOR ELEV. L �-1 I 3 +21:F Ih _ IA _ +2 D }, FIN.GRADE ELEV. I FN.GRADE LLEYP - }� LC 1L b • WEST r1 NATION aau:In'•1•$ AI c I 7 O _ �u!IH! u I; unumnmUuuum 1 .; w, ,_i' I El] 1J mmimmnnlUuuLWmnmHWninumumunnmut n!m1!nnui nmu• + SEE DOCK ELEVATION FILL IN(E)OPENINGS SEE DOCK SECTIO 4 W/GNU BLK.SEE OIL 1'INSULATED LOW"E'GLASS IN �- ANODIZED ALUMNUu FRAME - FILL W(E)OPENRIGS -� 4"s PIPE R/JIJNG. / 1 W/ChM BLK,SEE DTLI I _ SEE DOCK DWGS. {{fJ '1 MTL.STAIR.SEE I STL PIPE GUARDRAIL r- DTL 1/QA 46 I SEE DTL 4/0A 45 STL PIPE GUARDRAIL 81� 0 0 1 SEE DTL. 4/0A IS �8 6'I PIPE BOLURO Y SEE DTL. 15/OA 12 IVIIIIRI Illllllllllhulgluluuluu,, II/iiiiuuilllllllllllllllllllllllllillllllllllllllllllllllllilllll II' 1 l—i— E -ate b s IM ONATTON(34th QBFFT) NORTH A N rims() /,flI IN{DMDUAL ORANGE&BLUE /,`ELEV PAINT TWHITT}E.TIP..}{ LETTERS.MOUNTED ON(E)WALL-N I t'I1'11"1" __.• I Itl..=... 1 Z-- 3'-. .a" NEW WALL MOVNTED _ 4 ' L1GM Fl%TURF 1rK SEE DOCK ELEVATON X ►` O./>5/Ox Mk..WARTY.,SUSNnTH scv wrt DESCRIPTION Mr 5I. TTM. 03/01/02 O O O O T�(E)DOOR,SEE HOLLOW METAL G CW%SERVICE CENTER FACKfTY PROJECT NO.501020004 NEW RAIL AT RAIN, NOTE 1O OA-01 DOOR de FRAME _ �' 14'wTM saTla�snsTrloT Tr SK w STL PIPE GUARDRAIL SEE A/DA 45 [ A 50N00 v00C lwicn SEE DTL 14/DA 45 ^� • NEW RAIL AT DOCK, •SEE a/uA 45 -I M CON-WAY TRANSPORTATION SERVICES,INC. _ _M. M M• ....... —_ter_ hWWOO1. r00(74)214-540 IIIIIIIIIIIIII1111,11111111111111111111111@IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIgl,lll, _ 1 150 GUN°AVE, " r�.��w ^�.S_--S. lS._... Tom . 1 511.K 3 ^ y T v 510f 6-11i1 EL__a 1` j-1TL //Jf 510)1J5-WY SNrtt lrtlt r%E NO.O4.31.4y rot;rw. SHEET OFFICE BUILDING a2�" • EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS t2/05/01 OA-31 OA31 OWE Us.s PrkoDs iw 3/05/02 15:33:31 ARsl FAH:G:\DKG2\501020004 Renton\Sn0TW0010\.n0T22.34-.Wh.Owp V . . LIll 7. fil COLUMN 1 I COLUMN 2 I COLUMN 3 I COLUMN 4 1 WHITE lLE DUAL SEEKD 13/DA 13 &DOWNMS OUT GUTTER ROOF FLOOD UGHTHFIEADXTURE (N)LOADING DOCK El OFFICE BLDG. ]. p ]. O O St . O O O ® ,. 6 ] x t6 p p T NW . I . . 1 I.n IME11,unlrlumulfunlnRlnunnullalll■nlrl1mn11u1IrIl.nuullluull11111uuuuulul1111luuinlrle.uuuuuln11Irl11111ullnuuuulunwu.ul111lAuu111nuBl1Euluuluuulllrnuunl.uuuulu111ullnnu1nuu11nluul•u.11uuunlluunmullul/lu 11iiiui•ui 111111iiiuuu ii•ii111111iiiil iiiiiiiiiii1ii1ilii11nuMuuu11I1w1uw■111mmuu1u111111umm111mnnrmuuoniiiiiiuiuuwuinuwuuuuiiIrnuiuinu1niurlNuuuuiiimumuuuiunw11uxiiuuui�uuuiiwiiiuuuiuimr uuIu mIw�� RN.FLOOR ELEV. I4m1I�mll�1111 C1J 11�101P rrlii4©'1�©''1 IMII�©' ��'1��' �©1I4©'I4all�e�l©'I�©,l-i11'.Ism101 ill Ism Ism Ism ?1ml11 I411,101014m:I�m�101 EE'I��_,1 Olie ABS ELEV.-+25.83 ___ LADDER&CRAB YA PAINTED BAR,SEE OIL. STRIFE SOlE B/DA 42 TYP. LC.IONS.MFR.D TO SIZE S. DOWNSPOUTS AP ROX.)DETERMINE LOCATIONS OF DOWNSPOUTS. (LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROX.) DOCK — WEST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/16'- I'-0' Al (E)OFFICE BLDG. WHITE METAL ROOF PANELS,TYP. WHITE METAL WALL PANELS.TYP. //(N)LOADING DOCK 1 O fO to 11 13 t] ® 16 t. Il t. I. O , O O O O O • i I I 1 II II IIIIII I inn. II III tin I In unto II n III. I I nonnonI inflow I I II no III nl. in ul It it it I I n 1 Him 1 III (u II Ill 1 1 ( 1Iu 1111 1 11 ( 1 1(u .1 11% Ill I II ( I (1d _ II•111111111111111111I IIIIIIIIIII.\IIIIIIilliiiIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIV111111IIIIIIIIIIUIInIInplllll IIUIIIIIIIIUIIIIuui1I1II1urilu111111Il11Ilfulnuuwnnuluuuu�uummuul�11111•I➢•u11IIIIlII mluumul lIWnumu minion lllullmnun`IIIu11miI rF � 4=AF L--I AI�al-- I:J ©, � � lea i�©� its! �©,1..-.4 I =ni l �w '-© ©w,I mi-m4'��Fm,� _,>w 4- . 4 ___ - = LADDER k GRAB y4E1 PAINTED SEE DTL. RIFE DOCK — EAST ELEVATION R SCALE:1/16'-1'-0' SSEEE OIL. 14/a i3 _ At O ____ 1�" RIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII'IIII 1 STL.STAIR.SEE a/OS/px 'VAN.OM/MAW weuma llllllliilllIlllI 11 u i IIIIIIiilllllll- Dn. , DA,. p 1T DESCRIPTION DE.. X;p- ABS E LV 7-05.637' —IIII0I�©�iDIA0II1=, PEEE DBTOLLL MIS DA 42N. CWX SE RNCE CENTER FAGUIY 03/01/02 lialbraiiii rAxw sotmopa ,, mew 111.11NOTON __ ____ ___ • ASSESSORS VOICE.NURu ? .'PAINTED YELLOW CON-WAY TRANSPORTATION SERVICES.INC. at k FNDH..n SEE STRUCT. STRIPE i tip AI eIATA 820.1 UDDER h GqRAB BAR, DOCK LEVELER 6666 AMOR.n.pl2 1 SEE OTL B/DA K2 BUMPERS tNNN[(>x)>x-pxw Rs(>.>.)]t•-.a. IRA BRAID ASE. DOCK — NORTH ELEVATION (29th STREET) SCALE: 1/16'- I'-0' .tp ISO-57., FAX 610�FL5-WW INLET 1011 RI NO.O...4.. VI.LPMI LACL O�p DOCK ELEVATIONSwc, /01 DA-31 12/05 DA3I.DWG User prkop lev 03/05/02 T6:10:1G %RN FIIn:G:\OK02\50102000A Renton\Shor.dDoto\REdr22s3t-orBN.d.q J VC • • • riCOLUMN I I COLUMN 2 I COLUMN 3 I COLUMN 4 • O O m 0 O 9 A L. 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 222 " 0(.23 "° �_____ 2 `4 44 4 2 ° , -�--. L I n iw-o m�wo, I 'i n,A� MP Or 1 • _I� I ;mil A. Irir ,a Alii M.a�.o. J TOP>WON ..Ah u_ L7Ih tl9l'7 W""" I J UN yowl..,,L J PAL,.r • IMO a UfMnp. n MOM r. wwm,Aa,A Vow-,a PON MP WW1 AM IMMON 9 TYPICAL SIDE ELEVATION TYPICAL END ELEVATION(291h STREET AHD JNh SIRLLI) SECTION 04/00/02 111.42026 DEPARTIArt Smart. ALV MTL 0060flW004 OAA. MARK 03/01/02 CWX SERVICE CENTER FACILITY A AM6 IA M AOROT 40.w1010000 . [[ AS103fd43 C [A 7 o R CON—WAY TRANSPORTATION SERVICES.INC. SL o*002,I ruU MM NI(IOR,M 44203 • MIOAc(734)724-0203 Pm(734)sIA-saw & 100 00A410!N% NV91^.sTHLl$ cri.1ii 1 A slot Vag rut sloSS aTs-9vs 00€tl IIIIf rat MO.P4314.4 W.AAft PIET FUEL ISLAND w+i1MI T . ELEVATIONS AND SECTION ,fro, FA-31 _ • G3 - T23N R5E W 1/2 IL C❑ L SW 23rd St. , -ti IH IH IL ai >. 7th St CA R SW 27th St:' SW 27th St. it II II II i TM _._ . ` I Ii RC SW 29 ,h St II I a : ,L..1. x z S 30th St. 'I N N 1 i; W N I; z x IL CA pi II ' pl I0 34th St SW 34th St. A i h S t. , IL ! , , I IH ,f _, ., .7, . w z7 I 1 IL , ., „SW 39th St. f... . _ _ ,c, IM Q CA IL ' , ( .. _ _1 , , l• - IM 1 list st. I M SW 41st St. C A' 13 - 31 T23N R5E W 1/2 �Y �� .po H 3 �� ZONING ---- Renton dity Itmfta 1:4800 d®, P/B/PW TECHNICAL SERVICES •F o 03/15/02 30 T23N R5E W 1/2 &A•5330 (0 ZONING MAP BOOK • &:',fiii:614•Viii-Me211 liViti!ri.- 01,''AscEig Iii§:§in.livoitv L ... 1• __ _, .W::,::ix:E]z,tz-.•]:,:I.„W„g-,:,.::.-..,„,i,,.-,:._,„i,,.„,9:',-„,,':i,:.:.:::-:i.4:,:.i s R -4-.---,--- t 4 . 26 T'2a•4N R1',7 5' Ef747iI'7€ ,L 464 1 • • :..:'.. 1 03--::-%Mt . /AN li si glows. vi", , i•-•-.----- c2 i„.... , ( 35 •4N R5E 1 1(011.111K,W.:36.7 .:::: -... :VrtilibilielFritte,M- Eiiiiffi illitit . 1 MI 4,11.1111111114 tat,--t---7 ..0 D3,m1...,,, I _ , , imp 1 ' '-iagt.1.1_,Af, • i le 4111 Z 11111111. 4.7's\%L..,-'':-. M ii.:i.. Ai;ligaid 1__.„.,_41:-.. ow•kelq: li.....A ,11,141411! A?:).,,,k.;-41.4;:+2.024,44,:pwigiiiiiEg.. .G,Lainar - i..,'a,f.E112-m-iffelliiii tliftlI*4111h IT:rill, i 7,711;,.--ga,_„,„Firaii ,w 14ctirj:0,-- EMPt,411,-.4,,,_It11. ila *--ipi .".p ;101.ammiffif %,...1•47.1.0=NE,5,i,A, x ,i.--0iikiirmgamptalf, ki in.:PFEMI 111.rit ..±Li111111.11=.7:: ..\ v 1 7 `,4 it41k,.11141--::1;11•11!fiNlr•Nbli-1.=...ismillarr ,liri=-:1-. •_ \ milt omu % suil iii-7,-,EM ilk 1 I, a,' A15:1 ti! .1,74P:1191E il .141 a III NIP,,ria .1.447,.RtLitlirmiit-1 rill I 1111R. .;__...,.:14.\.ik.,i.. , if r.,;;;iii,,,,, 'Illi.ve:1,1 ,r1i i'E t '9.-AIL'- t'' ''• tom -, zatinl 1 I , vo:r--0- -.11,1,1a1,FP=MFM•16.. iimir;wily,I,1:111,iiill,:W/%1P.A1111111P.PPY I= m 11Pl eli ior!-iir..Ms_ ,. 8h 1 ell ow-it Ni hi .,,....4r,::.\iii\L.40 , , .tti.v. 9E1111 Is Ili 4 \ at.,..,, it,i0 ityll ,-,‘4 ..t. go* *114jyAiir..w461 ----N_-.--,--••_ • =,.. 7 1.-.4. . . a • 14,*,...v.iHlip •-itiw r Tp 1)1010 la:-.1k, . 611j_D.P.- I IT.f.0• 1 Imiim II I al• ' '; /11r2".1111k• \"'" r'''N.L''' I '''IlLaat, ;Alan !' IIMITALIL ' l'Efilall11140111MMU 1;"1 81, Q11 lar'61 act irt rim= 2;ii-J---d. 1!. . ''r 4.101). _ i 1 4 , ../W•-,...Ili -a-1410 LE \ 4 ': ALx N jr•V ' tglig -'''- ‘1111. ' i 114, , i i 1 1 ill1.111 NI I 11 1 il iztaiiii:.bilil '=AL':.....-„laii.kt tr-E174.4...: 2 723N"....;. ' 23 723N R5E I! L .111111alkY-;a 10 Fr•7.11 Pill 821 Toki - . 1 till ,1 till,:_h , SN 111 i 1 - Re 1 -• A I/.gr• i '14 1,IIII ' --- rib 1 I ti . I _moan-.1. C ' -., •vg 1 illi..#4,z i ' 6.1 e 6,, .41.,. 4 I I • I i 0..1 PILIAN 16 ,,. ArtNii 4ei Nigreolo...„,'Ils,,,._%-.. ., 11113,11N /23 R4E r!ili=j1 Vpil ge ;ITN irillir 71 Bel 1.11.r. ei 825 W.E.14111MNO RN , , IFIA Fifiii --I 4, 4 i , ir.i.!. !'' • 1111 A W49)E al ' p 1. P RI titte 1 , , id , . ,3N:• c, i 35 T23N R5e--: ':::: E men .,, r, '-i4----a 61 - -1111 60: PI4 •01 Ell ItqfPri Ji 833 ii--ailigIN / __.1.,, 1 1111ffir Fen its )211;R; .......... ........... °)41 1 ) ' Ad iit.lgiiiit. ,. , ,,o- , po.....: j,.:- .:milin 22N R4E -ISA I i 3 I It tH 410 - .tt. -• ea=1 .E i. 2 T22N R5EMIINEMIE=MIIMIMIIMMMill•TiMiriANN •-7411••••••••• •••• •• •• •••• - ..-.--'_ 11151IIIMILL MIXED USE CENTER • May include Overlay Districts. See Appendix I Resource Conservation CN Center Neighborhood' maps. For additional regulations in Overlay r--1 Districts, please see RMC 4-3. F-1 Residential 1 du/ao I CS J Center Suburban. F-1 Residential 5 Au/so I. CD Center Downtown. O.) Publicly owned F-7 Residential 8 du/ao I COR Center Office Residential ----Renton City Limits COMMPRCAlL .......-Adjacent City Limits 1-1 Residential Manufactured Homes GM Residential 10 du/se CA Commercial Arterial* MIMED Book Pages Boundary CM Residential 14 du/ao Co Commercial Office• KROLL I-1 Residential Multi-Family Infill cc Convenience Commercial IRM-NI Residential Multi-Family Neighborhood Center BousTRim P AG E# PAGE 1RN-C I Residential Multi-Family Suburban Center r----1 Industrial - Heavy "Cr"''''A"Ge INDEX IRR-UI Residential Multi-Family Urban Center. *4 Industrial - Medium IL Industrial - Light * .. e. . • 'CY c� *P Comments on the above application must be submitted In writing to Lesley Nlehihira,Senior Planner,Development Nr Services Division,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on May 21,2002.11 you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a parry of record end receive additional notification by mall,contact the Project Manager. NOTICE OF APPLICATION Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record end will be notified of any decision on ihle project. Al 0 PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON- CONTACT PERSON: LESLEY NISHIHIRA(425)430-7270 SIGNIFICANCE—MITIGATED(DNS-M) , !PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION • DATE: May 7,2002 a ow••.-..-...w F 11 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-02-042,SA-A,ECF APPLICATION NAME: CWX SERVICE CENTER PROJECT DESCP.PTION: The applicant Is requesting Environmental(SEPA)and Adminletrsthre Sits _ w• 1 • Plan review for p'oposed modifications to the existing Con-way Transportation Services CWX Service Center. The project Inclur es the demolition of the existing dock building and partial demolition of the reified dock for the r ' construction of a new platform end 25,980 square foot building on the site. In addition,a new 2,040 square foot Y" I fuel Island with et underground fuel tank would be created.A modification from the minimum required 100-toot _ loading clearance Brea has been requeeted In order to provide 90.5 feet of clear maneuvering area for truck trailers.Project instruction Is anticipated to be completed by December of 2002. i p PROJECT LOCATION: 400 SW 34e Street Ip •a: — OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED(DNS-Mb As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton • f '• has determined the'significant environmental Impact,are unlikely to mutt from the proposed project.Therefore,as e J permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110,the City of Renton S using the Optional DNS-M process to give notice thel a DN5- M Is likely to be lathed.Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are Integrated Into a single comment period.There will Sr no comment period following the Issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significancee y Mitigated(DNS.M).4 14-day appeal period will follow the Issuance of the DNS-M. e PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: April 9,2002 CrNOTICE OF COMP':.ETE APPLICATION: May 7,2002 Pernits/Revlew Req.uee(ed: Environmental(SEPA)Review,Administrative Site Plan Approval -, • ` i i I... Other Permits which may be required: Building Permits,Conetrun5on Permits 1 Requested Studies: Geotechnkal Report,Traffic Study , Location where appl matron may • I be reviewed: Planning/Building/public Works Division,Development Services Department, 1 • 1055 South Orally Way,Renton,WA 98055 _ s I CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: 1r_ I��i """' ' • Land Use: The subject site Is designated Employment Area Valley(EAV)on the City. �'----- I' , g Comprehensive Land Use Map and Heavy Industrial(IN)on the Ciys Zoning �e I, Map.The proposed modification to the existing truck terminal use is consistent i with each of these land use designations. • —' - fit.. =� I 1 Environmental Deer mlents that Evaluate the Proper ed Project: WA Development Regal'Mons Used For Project MI igetlon: The protect will be subject to the Cttys SEPA Ordinance,Zoning Code,Ahpon If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project,complete Repulauoct Public Works Standards,Uniform Building Cage, COde Fire Code this form and return to:City o1 Renton,Development Planning,1055 So.Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055. and other applicable codes and regulations as appropriate. File No.Name: LUA-02-042,SA-A,ECF/CWX Service Center Proposed Mitigation Measures: NAME: 1. The applicant will be required to pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee based on a rate of$0.52 per square fool of new bulldinj area. ADDRESS: 2. The applicant Mil be required to comply with the recommendations contained within the Geotechnical Report submitted will the application. TELEPHONE NO.: NOTICE OF APPDCAT ot, NOTICE OF APPucuesa1 ElvIARILYNFN CERTIFICATION STE OF S • I, Eli Oc - '(-(( hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document were posted by Ong in cons icuous places on or nearby the described property on �I`"'�� I f �C • Signed:'77) t �-n'L LA' ATTEST:Subscribed and sworn before me,a Notary Public,in and for th tate of II Washington residing it�9 a_vc'4�4,�+ ,on the / day of 111 a�J cD00, - - KAMEFF MYMARILYN APPOINTMENT EXPIRES:6-29-03 Received: 4/ 5/02 11 :59AM; -> CON*WAY TRANS SERvtcts; rage • YY y.•::kT. ��,+..1,�..is �. _t,... •�t,,�• �� tft F ii i •fat :x f•> ni>>?.i Y<..t ' < (Ss Le <. �f•{f�Sp"/ t t iEi < Sf .>iS E ! t` 'k'e F 3 2 f�r •°< F, .V � X <s y i is s 9f f Sf0 '{ +Y ,1 2 m �if tt „>f < < tl. < f f> <f .S vs. � > £ l' S�( Ate. 2 r > 1 3 �� R10112. i , C F).S4J^ i 3 pf > :� °at..: •• SS s t i r f> 3 �2 £�`e.< :>.>S i >£ i OS>i.� £ > e i. t<3 ;Y< A • PROJECT NAME: CWX Service Center APPLICATION NO: i,4 4 0 l Q' 2! SA "A y E LF The following is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. The Development Services Division will notify these individuals of the proposed development. NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER PLEASE SEE ATTACHED LIST • ^itl; r ^ e .t 4S4 I (Attach additional sheets, if necessary) Received: 4/ 5/02 12 OOPM -> CON*WAY TRANS SERVICES; Page 3 (Continued) NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER • • Applicant cant Certification I, Daniel W. Egeler , hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property (Print Name) owners and their addresses were obtained from: XX. Title Company Records King Countyt Assessors Records And th is urren ana accurate Signed Date 4/5/02 (Applicant) NOTARY Michigan ATTESTED: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of 12 residin on the 5th day of April I RODERICK J. I Signed . NOTARY PUBLIC WASHTENAWFRACASS CO.,MI (NAY Public) MY COMMISSION EXPIRES Aua 19.2f fl r .:mtv:D: i 1 p t. i x:Cr..x' ...,.� �Yil ?ot `on' ss S i r� 'f I t 'fi{5 � j'••Z` ,Y c >�It'Y Ig6 yfi, R•.y,"�iVi.1 !iii. % ( S S kit<e«2f:t >••r6>vw,,:<":yr,<;XS L i9 S 7. > is r. Y 3' A pVii ar 3fi... #'QK'4� ,yy � a > fe.r••{•;R..;ai.:s,..{,::..?�:..1:1:x�>>:>'£f" ��"'�•�+: ;t''e,_�•'>•.t,`::' ��. s�S;.'.� ��' 'Y� � `�� > > �u..} ,; ys t 0:-.♦✓r'.`v �•Ct! > i S - ',1 g4 i ¢3<7 ::'''�:£<f�<:<e:.�.. _ { ,we �:,. Y Q psi.b .. Y,9 +F.. , .�.' �C.,>, f� llii : . s t'' i 2' •°`rho; 2 3S f � > £!:�.<<•<i00'.,♦.,.>.., :e> V{> K i 3:e.a-z4.., .`T•_ < ., p n?"s' . ; {3 L1 Tx E-g. , y � e i xJ€s i ay ff".f igiv�<lgi,i,i,g p�olli .:w:a:!?`},. s • �t , pp��}. T °ig { ,< i eP�d •'7•,p,ja��jSic�k.. s f x <fj:ex':,.. : >J t� { >, ' 2i b ' ;,, t> 'q^ i• .# : r a` ": ;t.�:{Y'! .L�. s i �-,....., .,:lst y 's; d f 3. Sso{0 lid-.a 8 ,.41 ,01=i`' o �' f 3'•i d•.SY:1� �fs .�'.`C .rT f17 . , :�.''.�`.i ^ e G s a .',Kd T•..i YH ,i i i194:i ;w.. Y..' ..ba, .�`u S;> ,.L < .t,l i'i!::e.„ { f tge $ o ,.,C y< Ny x E � s::xi::•' p•� t s .i:.�. > . t;f`. EE.oi"r: .f:•oi.1...:g'>!•::Q'>r ;%::4ig't`..,1•Y:i,tig..; ..:,;�;£:X:l:: lr R .,,i.:., ',�8 N� s.y,�f, ': si {we �}^�:' .,.i. 4�,.e..:..> >f i >.S; > C .W sT. > '% .>�Cb It, f:>,,{{e 1i;n:••Y•� -4so:is>:>�1:i<��>,,:'<„>. ':�; f t�<Ts'"' .''�3Sif5"Ti � t: r { s{ i?A'>:si 3.;"{' ..°P' .a:^' �:.�: P C ;S 'f' .N,•J •' :^.i!Ji r' ' �g�':ii f: i T>is iiw. <.Y. vYYYa Tv'. .'.Ri}}.��,:�3X�f<h.i..ap.; :i<;'.i..:3:.'.>f..:.{;;u�w �p� !: i ��pppg i;•<;.re<;tko>. a °es s,.i�;f •eCiC,+l,7 p-'.ew F,sr wilt HAs�{ s'sI:,j4 I'S.V..+.. . te:•x••1tl°>«w•n':>; , st , ,S ,« : A t afr+.4:0.. nx :'::.'Suit; > . . .iit ii;`..4;1;;•K�»,.,>,:;Z? .;i i >3 s S-#, f I: ."3t,tbiA;�,�i 'K '�y�.::f'�°:vi:'>:f!r i�.��'�'•:i�Zi. 2 �� te.,t <�3 i.�>(,�i/.F r s. ��:!?�.S'.,S<�;>'S�n{S ii iT S >:£fe i�.> �i� it .l•��>..p�i: �N 'y ��+sf� �{'�,•.. 4${i?A <..', r;1 ?{>.t3. ; { r 'itn:fs fk it Sk# >.. S > ` ss - if. f >jfi O :Ofsa i4 >O..,•Y+,•;..r > ' e f ,{ FIl 4 t i Rt f k A • <> :::4pr1, _4•••x• • 5f Y fg a>� ;:� a� 2yk'a.�s M:ii:;> s S#1 s<) :1• •i . •<. <>ii: ..)»,_is i.,;:.:,77:7:y�y: '.yS34t: , ; t xC•$f F. •T -k„i' hi f oiY:a.bt i:i, S.f s� F.s I i f 1 i, i,.�. s 1;i i Tf6 1 y .{�q> i F s>: tit £� �g t i s L .1. 'f S ., i :s;nt.�r,<•o:,d 'Ss .i i s! S <fdt a S4 x> f is S -S i 1 t$0' w.:ir fs>>...ffi.s;;>. i o r. is;•'.. ;:c7... ,f>.•,•;p:t.i>nif: ..i.: .< iti. .r.:r*ii?.;c:n '£ o'K �� lift. 61Y r .Y:' 3 1'. >B.{• ,>� 2:.e♦ t ,.f,{is::•>•<;.>:,.;.:::: > {i.. a... y. g ff•�.3• .t.<> w.>:x::{.u. . „I, ,fps �;y[ •>:e .i.. .,?'f;Y oi.ia;:i'ii•r';`;i?SiF:k�; { - �a,�ix ��:.T.r #� t . �{ 4' P.Ot is :::<•'.:FS .e i P' AI k.x x;{i• 2:f?i' f ::�1 C:i:e:!' ;f�il:e;c:•:f•x...•::•,;•.1•: <1.:°.'it•sia'. •.'./� : < i S;f ?>i,' :J n S �1,��. ''{ < :.nS,<,.> o J.Y > •r . <• ,.� .� }�{w�l SLe,;) ?a �7� [�.LiG .;,>„>._. ,e7F�'�' x f� u:< . n•''wa;L :. i•iv ".. .<.. { -.: ...,.K.:a..0:i:':r 1},• 81••�::. � • `sy,:, ••✓c 3 ,.y.. kithi•::fs> k;a iai...is .s ss1:. ;;?;:.. r:1` :.;f.>.y.t ;••,,,,•,••••J$"-.. :•sfS$R:k..1i:f`' i.•.: o 3i e - '•'II; .�..,., f i<'�:f:f e;s:.3"?:i:i$: >Urfthe:';•.•'f,�t :•ila, sat::.� >.>::. ...... ,'Rs'a s..: f.�r:y < %f: x :. {:>r....t...i; i%a.t' >s ,f S>{, a` alti; <•:< ;• :r 'G s .ittii :fj i T. o S'{ { \•k;H• i't <.r...i: •>�•<. j1 Y,fr i >{6j.. >x.£�.;;: •x> { 2 Z f f ;tx.2ki>fY,os S T<<W {s 5 B;- > ,b!•�,. is .',IL1i`..` f , f ;l .ai f f. >1. .: i.:F:; .,...i .. : >.3, i'O -„t.{_a �a . yfrp.0�t•. jn•3' :E _asp'<...: $""� �E1'� •i1b'i0°>,...<:. __S,d<... .. �f°�'�0° MARILYN KAMCHEFF v MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES:6-29-03 2 NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER Eugene T. &Penny R. Church 3820 E.Valley Road 125360 0010 Renton,WA 98055 Powell-Renton No. 1 Llc 737 Market Street 125360 0070 Kirkland,WA 98033 Pietromonaco of Modern Llc P.O.Box 700 125379 0010 Mercer Island,WA 98040 Portal Security Llc 812 SW 128th Street 125379 0020 Seattle,WA 98146 Motor Freight L L C P.O.Box 4679 125380 0010 Seattle,WA 98104 United Title Corp. 3435 SE 17th Avenue 125380 0020 Portland,OR 97202 Puget Sound Energy&Elec P.O.Box 90868 125380 0021 Bellevue,WA 98009 Lecuyer Family L L C 14900 Interurban Ave. S.,Suite 210 125380 0030 Seattle,WA 98168 Lecuyer Family L L C 14900 Interurban Ave. S.,Suite 210 125380 0032 Seattle,WA 98168 Brekke Properties P.O.Box 287 125380 0034 Medina,WA 98039 Brekke Properties 8592 Hunts Point Ln 125380 0035 Bellevue,WA 98004 American Legend Cooperative 200 SW 34th Street 125380 0040 Renton,WA 98055 A/H II Company Llc 2098 Breezy Point Road 125380 0060 Camano Island,WA 98282 Con!-Way Transportation Svcs,Inc. 110 Parkland Plaza 125380 0080 Ann Arbor,MI 48103 American Legend Cooperative 200 SW 34th Street 125380 0090 Renton,WA 98055 Corr-Pro Associates Llc 301 SW 27th Street 125380 0110 Renton,WA 98055 Pietromonaco Illc P.O.Box 700 125380 0120 Mercer Island,WA 98040 Farwest Steel Corporation P.O.Box 889 125380 0211 Eugene,OR 97440 Farwest Steel Corporation P.O.Box 889 125380 0211 Eugene,OR 97440 Bnsf Rwy Co. 1700 E.Golf Road 125380 0230 Schaumburg,IL 60173 CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM Date: May 23, 2002 To: Lesley Nishihira Taco( ct-�ttkr From: Paul Lumbert, Plan Review Subject: CWX Service Center LUA-02-042 EXISTING CONDITIONS WATER - There are existing 12-inch water mains located in SW 34h Street, SW 29th Street, City held easement at eastside of the site, and a 10-inch water main located in the City held easement at westside of the site. SEWER — There are existing 8-inch sanitary sewer mains located in SW 29th Street and SW 34th Street. STORM — The site is served by existing storm drainage mains located in SW 34th Street and SW 29th Street. STREETS- The existing street improvements meet City codes and standards. CODE REQUIREMENTS WATER 1. New water main, fire hydrants, and fire control system must meet fire flow and current fire codes/regulations, per Renton Fire Department. 2. Any new or existing fire hydrants used to protect the site will require a quick connect (Storz type) fitting on the main port. 3. Water system development charges may be required on the site if not previously paid. SANITARY SEWER 1. The proposed fuel island will require a drainage system to collect surface water or spillage from the concrete pad to an oil/water separator and connection to the sanitary sewer system. 2. The above system will require a shut-off valve between the oil/water separator and the sewer connection point. 3. The size of the oil/water separator must be able to contain any ruel spilled on the pad surface and pad wash down. 4. The concrete pad area will require a roof or canopy cover. SURFACE WATER 1. The project will not add any new impervious surface to the site. Therefore, no additional drainage system improvements will be required. 2. No system development charge will be required. TRANSPORTATION 1. If no new vehicle trips are added to the site, no traffic mitigation fees will be required. 2. A traffic study was submitted by the applicant for the project. PLAN REVIEW - GENERAL 1. All plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. 2. A construction permit is required. When plans are complete three copies of the drawings, two copies of the drainage report, a construction estimate, application and appropriate fee shall be submitted to the sixth floor counter. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS 1. Temporary Erosion Control shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project. 2. All existing facilites shall be protected from silt and mud for the duration of the construction activities. 3. A construction plan indicating haul route and hours, construction hours and a traffic control plan shall be finalized for approval prior to any permit being issued. Haul hours shall be restricted to 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. unless approved in advance by the Development Services Division. cc: Neil Watts City of Re.,.,,.. Department of Planning/Building/Public I s ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: y k COMMENTS DUE: MAY 21, 2002 C, g APPLICATION NO: LUA-02-042,SA-A, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MAY 7,2002 0g.C� APPLICANT: TranSystems Corporation PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nishihira 30, �� 0i ;- PROJECT TITLE: CWX Service Center WORK ORDER NO: 4020 �S: _ LOCATION: 400 SW 34th Street cc% p R 10 r dv L„ SITE AREA: 392,420 SF BUILDING AREA(gross): 27,990 SF VI SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL:The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA)and Administrative Site Plan review for piroposed modifications to the existing Con-way Transportation Services CWX Service Center. The project includes the demolition of the existing dock building and partial demolition of the raised dock for the construction of a new platform and 25,980 square foot building on the site. In addition, a new 2,040 square foot fuel island with an underground tank would be created. A modification from the minimum required 100-foot loading clearance area has been requested in order to provide 90.5 feet of clear maneuvering area for truck trailers. Project construction is anticipated to be completed by December of 2002. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 1 , 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS 17) 1 g 3 1- /(C. j/11-4-, a4 (-- /1-1(r) C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS \4g4t, CIAA_ ,� �� y ,& We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is nee to properly assess this proposal. ----'A-K.J-e.7e- 1/Z/Kj(-, 3// ?/69Z Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Routing Rev.10/93 ird ) City of F._...Jn Department of Planning/Building/Public vvurhs • ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION R VIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: I��? 0- COMMENTS DUE: MAY 21, 2002 APPLICATION NO: LUA-02-042, SA-A, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MAY 7,2002 APPLICANT: TranSystems Corporation PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nishihira PROJECT TITLE: CWX Service Center WORK ORDER NO: 4020 LOCATION: 400 SW 341h Street SITE AREA: 392,420 SF BUILDING AREA(gross): 27,990 SF SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL:The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA)and Administrative Site Plan review for proposed modifications to the existing Con-way Transportation Services CWX Service Center. The project includes the demolition of the existing dock building and partial demolition of the raised dock for the construction of a new platform and 25,980 square foot building on the site. In addition,a new 2,040 square foot fuel island with an underground tank would be created. A modification from the minimum required 100-foot loading clearance area has been requested in order to provide 90.5 feet of clear maneuvering area for truck trailers. Project construction is anticipated to be completed by December of 2002. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth _ Housing Air Aesthetics _ Water - Light/Glare Plants - Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation / Environmental Health Public Services - Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources - Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet Ii Cik-5 Knuat B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where ad itional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. - 14-1L Signature of Director ors Authorized Representative Date Routing Rev.10/93 CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: May 17,2002 TO: Lesley Nishihira FROM: Sonja J. Fesser, SUBJECT: CWX Service Center,LUA-92-042,SA Legal Description Review I have reviewed the legal description contained within the above referenced site plan submittal and find it satisfactory as presented. NOTE: Tax Account# 1253800050(as the tax lot number for Lot 5)should be noted on the Land Use Permit Master Application, in addition to# 1253800080(Lot 8). w:WILE.SYS\LND\2o\CWXCENTR.doc City of Ri 7 Department of Planning/Building/Public :s ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ( vy\S vtL-tUy\ 9 i.ViGQ5 COMMENTS DUE: MAY 21, 2002 APPLICATION NO: LUA-02-042,SA-A, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MAY 7,2002 IiY°Fnev oN APPLICANT: TranSystems Corporation PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nishihirah1e C E/ EQ PRLOCOATION JECT 1400'SW 34'CWX SStreet ice Center WORK ORDER NO: 4020 Mir U 20�? SITE AREA: 392,420 SF BUILDING AREA(gross): 27,990 SFSvI CDINC'D/v/SIGN SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL:The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA)and Administrative Site Plan review for proposed modifications to the existing Con-way Transportation Services CWX Service Center. The project includes the demolition of the existing dock building and partial demolition of the raised dock for the construction of a new platform and 25,980 square foot building on the site. In addition,a new 2,040 square foot fuel island with an underground tank would be created. A modification from the minimum required 100-foot loading clearance area has been requested in order to provide 90.5 feet of clear maneuvering area for truck trailers. Project construction is anticipated to be completed by December of 2002. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS c) c- vtli We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Routing Rev.10/93 CITY OF RENTON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT NEIGHBORHOODS, AND STRATEGIC PLANNING MEMORANDUM DATE: May 14,2002 TO: Lesley Nishihira FROM: II) Don Erickson SUBJECT: CWX Service Center Loading Dock,400 SW 34th Street;LUA- 02-042 The applicants are proposing to replace an existing enclosed loading dock warehouse with a new 25,9809 square foot building and a new 2,040 square foot fuel island. An existing dock building would be demolished. The subject 9 acre site is located in the Employment Area —Valley land use designation as shown on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. It is zoned Industrial Heavy(IH). Relevant Comprehensive Plan Land Use Policies: Policy LU-212.2. Compatible and related land uses should be encouraged to locate in proximity to one another. Policy LU-212.3. Development standards should promote an increased intensity and quality of development. Policy LU-212.19. Street trees and landscaping should be required for new development within the Valley to provide an attractive streetscape in areas subjected to a transition of land uses. Policy LU-212.24. Site plan review should be required for all new projects in the Renton Valley and Black River areas pursuant to thresholds established in the City's development regulations. Analysis: The subject site is located in an area surrounded by other even larger warehouses so it clearly is compatible with its surroundings. This would be a good time to review the adequacy of existing landscaping on the site and propose new landscaping where appropriate to ensure a high quality industrial environment. No adverse environmental impacts were identified from our review. Applicants are encouraged to meet the 2% wildlife habitat landscaping requirement per the Green River Valley Plan. Conclusion: The subject proposal appears to be consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan designation for this area. No adverse environmental impacts were apparent from our review. cc: Rebecca Lind H:\EDNSP\Interdepartmental\Development Review\Green File\Comments\CWX Serice Center.doc\d )PERTY SERVICES FEE REVIEW #21 02F3 • ❑ DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET 0 PLAN REVIEW ROUTING SLIP O ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET 0 OTHER APPLICANT: -f-tkidY8-j--1„l, copi -tR, p poij RECEIVED FROM JOB ADDRESS: 4, 5W WO# 4Ozo (date) NATURE OF WORK: )„aiDtFlr-.a-1(nu c 3nda--ricvsix gmRvica-ckrrpcGREEN# ❑ SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AND CONNECTION FEES APPLIED NEED MORE INFORMATION: 0 LEGAL DESCRIPTION ❑ SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AND CONNECTION FEES ESTIMATED 0 SQUARE FOOTAGE 0 VICINITY MAP ❑ NOT APPROVED FOR APPLICATION OF FEES 0 FRONT FOOTAGE ❑ OTHER ❑ VESTED ❑ NOT VESTED ❑ This fee review supersedes and cancels fee review# dated - O 50 ❑ PARENT PID#(subject to change)_ SUBJECT PROPERTY PID# 1253 - ©Qpvm ❑ King Co.Tax Acct#(new) It is the intent of this development fee analysis to put the developer/owner on notice,that the fees quoted below may be applicable to the subject site upon development of the property. All quoted fees are potential charges that may be due and payable at the time the construction permit is issued to install the on-site and off-site improvements(i.e.underground utilities,street improvements,etc.) Triggering mechanisms for the SDC fees will be based on current City ordinances and determined by the applicable Utility Section. Please note that these fees are subject to change without notice. Final fees will be based on rates in effect at time of Building Permit/Construction Permit application. The following quoted fees do NOT include inspection fees,side sewer permits,r/w permit fees or the cost of water meters. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PARCEL METHOD OF ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS NO. NO. ASSESSMENT UNITS OR FEE Latecomer Agreement(pvt) WATER -O- Latecomer Agreement(pvt)WASTEWATER -p - Latecomer Agreement (pvt)OTHER • _ -O - Special Assessment District/WATER O- Special Assessment District/WASTEWATER • /O- Joint Use Agreement(METRO) — Local Improvement District * — Traffic Benefit Zones $75.00 PER TRIP,CALCULATED BY TRANSPORTATION — FUTURE OBLIGATIONS — SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-WATER #OF UNITS/ SDC FEE O Pd Prey. 0 Partially Pd (Ltd Exemption) 0 Never Pd SQ. FTG. Single fampy residential$1,105/unit x Mobile home dwelling unit $885/unit in park Apartment, Condo$665/unit not in CD or COR zones x Commercial/Industrial, $0.154/sq. ft. of property (not less than$1105.00)X > Boeing,by Special Agreement/Footprint of Bldg plus 15 ft perimeter(2,800 GPM threshold) SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-WASTEWATER ❑ Pd Prey. 0 Partially Pd (Ltd Exemption) 0 Never Pd Single family residential dwelling unit $760/unit x Mobile home dwelling unit $610/unit x Apartment, Condo$455/unit not in CD or COR zones x �'D Commercial/Industrial, $0.106/sq. ft. of property (not less than$760.00)X REDEVELOPMENT CREDIT: (New-Old Flow)/New Flow X Above Fees -per CI R�r- p SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-SURFACEWATER ❑ Pd Prey. 0 Partially Pd (Ltd Exemption) 0 Never Pd Single family residential and mobile home dwelling unit $525/unit x All other properties $0.183/sq ft of new impervious area of property x (not less than $525.00) 0 5c). -FT. * PRELIMINARY TOTAL $ o.C.C. l f R � N t dG.I a ) . LACY)fJi� rJ/1?/�? Ol O Signature of viewi uthority DA ►1 N *If subject perty is within an LID, it is developers responsibility to check with the Finance Dept. for paid/un-paid status. **The square footage figures used are taken from the King County Assessor's map and are approximate only. m N EFFECTIVE January 4,2001 N, tD 4 Ii City of R_..._n Department of Planning/Building/Public vvvn,(S ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: '' ;�.�l�r COMMENTS DUE: MAY 21, �O �`=i !; t: 1 ! APPLICATION NO: LUA-02-042,SA-A, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MAY 7,2002 APPLICANT: TranSystems Corporation PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley NishihiraMAY — 8 2002 PROJECT TITLE: CWX Service Center WORK ORDER NO: 4020 J r , ,;;1 LOCATION: 400 SW 34th Street -„ ,. SITE AREA: 392,420 SF I BUILDING AREA(gross): 27,990 SF SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL:The applicant is requesting Environmental(SEPA)and Administrative Site Plan review for proposed modifications to the existing Con-way Transportation Services CWX Service Center. The project includes the demolition of the existing dock building and partial demolition of the raised dock for the construction of a new platform and 25,980 square foot building on the site. In addition,a new 2,040 square foot fuel island with an underground tank would be created. A modification from the minimum required 100-foot loading clearance area has been requested in order to provide 90.5 feet of clear maneuvering area for truck trailers. Project construction is anticipated to be completed by December of 2002. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the ' Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing _ Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation , Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet A /1",, ..,„, x.,,ya, /01 41 B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS AY C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS ..e,e..r it 'W &44#14"ij We have revie ed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where ditional information is ne i to properly assess this proposal. 0 e ______ Signature Directo�Authorized Rep&' rzen r e Date Routing ` Rev.10/93 l 'CY C1 O� . ® . CITY OF RENTON FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU�N�o MEMORANDUM DATE: May 8, 2002 TO: Jason Jordan, Planner /\2fFROM: Jim Gray, Assistant Fire Marshal, ; SUBJECT: Con-Way Trucking Terminal, 400 SW 34th St. MITIGATION ITEMS; 1. A fire mitigation fee is not required for this project. FIRE CODE REQUIREMENTS: 1. Existing hydrants are sufficient for this project. Stortz fittings are required to be installed on the existing hydrants if they are not already installed on them. 2. Separate plans and permits are required for the sprinkler modifications, additions and fire alarm system. Separate plans and permits are required for the installation of the new fuel tanks and monitoring systems. 3. Fire Department access roadways are required to within 150 feet of all portions of the building exterior. Roadways are a minimum 20 in width with a turning radius of 45 foot outside and 25 foot inside. 4. Provide a list of the flammable, combustible liquids and any hazardous chemical to be used or stored on site. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. • ujiRO „ATT..) NOTICE OF APPLICATION A ND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON- SIGNIFICANCE - MITIGATED (DNS-M) • DATE: May 7,2002 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-02-042,SA-A,ECF APPLICATION NAME: CWX SERVICE CENTER PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant Is requesting Environmental (SEPA) and Administrative Site Plan review for proposed modifications to the existing Con-way Transportation Services CWX Service Center. The project Includes the demolition of the existing dock building and partial demolition of the raised dock for the construction of a new platform and 25,980 square foot building on the site. In addition,a new 2,040 square foot fuel island with an underground fuel tank would be created. A modification from the minimum required 100-foot loading clearance area has been requested In order to provide 90.5 feet of clear maneuvering area for truck trailers. Project construction Is anticipated to be completed by December of 2002. PROJECT LOCATION: 400 SW 349"Street OPTIONAL DE TERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED(DNS-M):As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has determines that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore,as permitted unde the RCW 43.21 C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS-M process to give notice that a DNS- M is likely to bE issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period. There dill be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated(DNS.M). A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: April 9,2002 NOTICE OF CI)MPLETE APPLICATION: May 7,2002 Permits/Review Requested: Environmental(SEPA)Review,Administrative Site Plan Approval Other Permits which may be required: Building Permits,Construction Permits Requested Studies: Geotechnical Report,Traffic Study Location wherE application may be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division, Development Services Department, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Land Use: The subject site is designated Employment Area Valley(EAV)on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Map and Heavy Industrial(IH)on the City's Zoning Map. The proposed modification to the existing truck terminal use is consistent with each of these land use designations. Environment.I Documents that Evaluate the I roposed Project: N/A Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: The project will be subject to the City's SEPA Ordinance,Zoning Code,Airport Regulations,Public Works Standards,Uniform Building Code,Uniform Fire Code and other applicable codes and regulations as appropriate. Proposed Mit gation Measures: 1. The al plicant will be required to pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee based on a rate of$0.52 per square foot of nee building area. 2. The applicant will be required to comply with the recommendations contained within the Geotechnical Report submi led with the application. NOTICE OF APP.'CATION Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Lesley Nishihira, Senior Planner, Development Services Divisicn, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on May 21,2002. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail,contact the Project Manager. Anyone who su)mits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: LESLEY NISHIHIRA (425)430-7270 PLEASE INCI.UDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION I 6 O w•,.'-.'-.N ENTON€ g=r _- LI . 1 ® Y 'QTIPPIE:l LY I ' 1 1.:I■II II 4 7.1.---0- ot) ......_ . 114 • I . VN 1 i ,.. ra-st.zi 4. .Li ./, Z II 1I I. I / . I N d 41 If you would ike to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project, complete this form anc return to: City of Renton, Development Planning, 1055 So. Grady Way, Renton,WA 98055. File No./Nan le: LUA-02-042,SA-A, ECF/CWX Service Center NAME: ADDRESS: TELEPHONIi NO.: NOTICE OF APF_ICATION .• CITY P RENTON sal .1 Planning/Building/PublicWorks Department ti Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator Jesse'n.nner,Mayor May 7, 2002 Mr. Kit Wong TranSystems Corporation 180 Grand Avenue, Suite 400 Oakland, CA 94612 SUBJECT: CWX Service Center Project No. LUA-02-042, SA-A, ECF Dear Mr. Wong: The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on May 28, 2002. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. Please contact me, at (425) 430-7270, if you have any questions. Sincerely, Lesley Nishihira-- Senior Planner cc: Con-Way Transportation Services/Owners acceptance RENTON 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 ® AHEAD OF THE CURVE This paper contains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer e TT:�y., , + S is " S u 4;cam s su'>� ai-a"�R'✓' '», ait�;;t�9.N* ,y,,. ,Yr s k :y e , .. s'�a.S".xN., -., IXJ ,' "'t'�'S. YL . CiTY�OFI - O �` � .) ._ ,a - � i a—;5 i c1-1:r a 'r 3 A k ' 414.4 r p• LAZ� c c-' A;"` x y , s €~vim ,f r ,t IDE ELOPMEN PK-m!*DES D1W1— N• .,r x x,.$ t s L' 7 .ASP _.x q = M�R "1 i f. ,yk � Y ,1%• �• r�... , 1 ALA ® U„S - ID 'MI r t lug- � ASTIR ±i�4, PL1 �4T1®N p gas tr C 1 F®RNIATI® Ali ote 3lf tt- re ino e�; .' ktilst. . + ,. S�St 2� is- t k.,�.w. alto al• o riz ; sa� !:::,so orTea owner PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: NAME: CWX Service Center Con-Way Transportation Services PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION and Zip Code: ADDRESS: 400 SW 34th Street 110 Parkland Plaza Renton, WA 98005 CITY: ZIP: — Ann Arbor, MI 48103 KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): TELEPHONE NUMBER: 1253800080 734-769-0203 A e L C - `'o er t nai a > x�€ . EXISTING LAND USE(S): rx1 ' rys . / „k„ .y,y i x r t 23, Truck Terminal NAME: PROPOSED LAND USE(S): Kit Wong Truck Terminal COMPANY(if applicable): TranSystems Corporation EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: IH EAv ADDRESS: 180 Grand Ave Suite 400 PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): CITY: ZIP: IH Oakland, CA 94612 EXISTING ZONING: Heavy Industrial TELEPHONE NUMBER 510-835-2761 X 206 E' J pOPeSED ZONING (if applicable) :Heavy- Qa t.: t.) Heavy Industrial ,° 10 0 J •:I I0 i SITE AREA (in square feet): 392,420 w: ' NAME: SQUARE-'i FOOTAGE OF ROADWAYS TO BE DEDICATED „,, I SUBDIVISIONS OR PRIVATE STREETS SERVING Kit Wong THREE LOTS OR MORE (if applicable): COMPANY(if applicable): N/A TranSystems Corporation PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET ADDRESS: ACRE (if applicable):N/A 180 Grand Ave Suite 400 NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable): CITY: ZIP: N/A Oakland, CA 94612 NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): TELEPHONE NUMBER AND E-MAIL ADDRESS: N/A 510-835-2761 NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS(if applicable): kmwong@transystems.com N/A masterap.doc Revised April 2001 f/� 6� d . t , c- x r, 10-° O on nue ' .„.,1 i r� -4 ; SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL PROJECT VALUE: $2,500,000.00 BUILDINGS(if applicable): N/A SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): N/A ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): BUILDINGS (if applicable): 27,990 sf ❑ AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA ONE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL ❑ AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA TWO BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): 1 7,00posf-remain 31,720s -demo ❑ FLOOD HAZARD AREA sq.ft. NET FLOOR AREA OF NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS(if ❑ GEOLOGIC HAZARD sq.ft. applicable): ❑ HABITAT CONSERVATION sq.ft. NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE ❑ SHORELINE STREAMS AND LAKES sq.ft. NEW PROJECT(if applicable): ❑ WETLANDS sq.ft. Lots 5 and 8 in block 1 of Burlington Northern Orilla Indutrial Park Renton division No. 1, according to plat recorded in volume 108 of plats at page(s) 12 and 13,in King County, Washington l i ri , P,E P ie, P, IG�ATION &. E YChe'k=a ICal(on esnr12.t •t staff il.�oC er�Yii :x-4,- ,. *�.. - ram.- , .x_ ..z...-____.. � Y _ANNEXATION(A) $ SHORELINE REVIEWS _COMP PLAN AMENDMENT(CPA) $ _CONDITIONAL USE(SM-C) $ _CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT(CU-A,CU-H) $ _EXEMPTION(SME) $ NO CHARGE _ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW(ECF) $ _SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT(SM) $ _GRADE&FILL PERMIT(GF) $ _VARIANCE(SM-V) $ (No.Cu.Yds: ) $ _REZONE(R) $ SUBDIVISION _ROUTINE VEGETATION $ _BINDING SITE PLAN(BSP) $ MANAGEMENT PERMIT(RVMP) _FINAL PLAT(FP) $ X SITE PLAN APPROVAL(SA-A,SA-H) $ _LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT(LLA) $ _SPECIAL PERMIT(SP) $ _PRELIMINARY PLAT(PP) $ _TEMPORARY PERMIT(TP) $ _SHORT PLAT(SHPL-A,SHPL-H) $ _VARIANCE(V-A,V-H,V-B) $ (from Section: ) $ Postage: $ _WAIVER(W) $ - TOTAL FEE $ OTHER: $ .R I,(Print Name),5 i e tA EVe /---&i-k- 'rk5 ,declare that I am(please check one) _the current owner of the property involved in this application or X the authorized representative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization)and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence thatAeLle e �- D6 T3 signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/F}et/ r free and voluntary act for ` the uses and purposes mentioned in the'nstrument. ke L/ 1( V 62 Y'-e`C"\� ICJ\C� S �'u 9. p,c �_- (Name of er/Repre 've) Notary Public i ra d for the State ofWashingtotr- _ Notary(Print) 3A\1.,,( f.— F\ )r' (Signature of Owner/Represen tive) My appointment expires: NIOU• 13 9 on to masterap.doc Revised April 2001 ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT im. ▪ State of California • ICounty of \rce ss. i IOn b t ,- Ou— O before me, , � E - F\-eL€A , I • (DATE) \ 1 (NOTARY) • I personally appeared 5 - Ve/Y1 E tie ram ' -Ra a'TS I SIGNER(S) • I ❑ personally known to me - OR- rig proved to me on the basis of satisfactory I • evidence to be the person( whose names ' • Iis/, subscribed to the within instrument and I • acknowledged to me that he/s /th3y executed i i l' ,s,„, SALLY E.FLETCHER the same in his/ r/t it authorized Commission 11330056 Z • = ca acit 1 and that byhis/ /thr • - -' -ii Notary Public-California £ p y I \. ..,mp Placer County signature on the instrument the person(; '". ' My Comm.Expires Nov 13,2005 • or the entity upon behalf of which the • iperson(,facted, executed the instrument.• I I I• WITNESS my hand and official seal. I 1--- ----) i • NOT SIGNATURE • i i • OPTIONAL INFORMATION • • I The information below is not required by law. However, it could prevent fraudulent attachment of this acknowl- • edgment to an unauthorized document. • ICAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER (PRINCIPAL) DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT I • • ❑ INDIVIDUAL ❑ CORPORATE OFFICER• • TITLES) TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT I • • I ❑ PARTNER(S) I • ❑ ATTORNEY-IN-FACT • I ❑ TRUSTEE(S) NUMBER OF PAGES I • ❑ GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR • I ❑ OTHER: I • • IDATE OF DOCUMENT I • • iSIGNER IS REPRESENTING: • • INAME OF PERSON(S)OR ENTITY(IES) I • OTHER • L•........•.•_•......•.......•........•.......•i•_•.......•......•.......•.....•_•......•..._.•.......•� APA 1/94 VALLEY-SIERRA,800-362-3369 r 0. Project Information/Construction Mitigation Description , CWX Service Center, ;. 4'400 SW 34th Street, Renton,WA - Pre ared by TranSystems Co April 9, 2002 y -4 c• +. Project Information The property is approximately 9 acres and spans between 29th Street and 34th Street. The site and adjacent properties are zoned IH. The proposed project would only involve the southern 3/4 of the property. The maintenance building and fueling facility north of the fence line is leased to another tenant and no modifications will be made in this area. The proposed use of the facility will remain as existing,which is a truck terminal. However, the geometry of the existing building will need to be reconfigured. The proposed modifications include the demolition of the existing dock building and partial demolition of the raised dock. A new platform and building will be erected over the existing dock structure. The new dock building is 25,980 sf. And is 22'-8"above grade. The new dock building will be shorter than the existing one. (see site plan). The office will remain as B occupany and the dock will be a S1 occupancy. New concrete dock aprons will be installed. Minor adjustment to grades will be required to keep existing flow lines. Otherwise, no modification of the existing storm drainage system is proposed. Existing site lighting will be augmented. A new fuel island with an underground tank is proposed. No other site work is proposed other than striping. The lot coverage, therefore,will not change. The access to the site from 34th Street is currently via two driveways. The proposed plan will not use the east driveway. However, no modifications to the driveway cuts are proposed. The soil at the site is mainly silty sand, sand and clay. The two story office structure will remain. The second floor will not be used and will be permanently sealed off except for roof access. The ground floor will be renovated for the new function. One tree will be cut to allow space for a new handicapped ramp. Loading Access It was noted in the preliminary plan review that the clear distance between face of dock and the west property line is less than City code requirement of 100 feet. The existing dimension is 95'- 6". The proposed construction is to cap over the existing dock with a new structure. The proposed work would further reduce this dimension to approximately 90' —6". Although this is less than the code requirement,we believe that the dimension will provide adequate space to meet the intent of the code. The intent of the code is to provide enough space in front of loading docks to allow for vehicle turning, and minimize damage to property fence and screening along such fences. The 100 feet dimension is a guideline for standard 40' length truck trailers. At a crossdock facility of this size and type, the typical trucks trailers are 28',which are coupled together before leaving the facility. The trailers are 12' shorter than the standard trailer and therefore the space available for turning would remain adequate. The double 28' trailers also have a smaller turning radius that the 40' standard trailers. We have performed a truck turning radius study for this area and confirm that truck access is adequate. Construction Mitigation Description Proposed construction period: June 1, 2002 to December 31, 2002 Hours of construction operation: 7:00 am to 4:00 pm M-F. No proposed weekends and evening work. Proposed transportation route: Via 34th Street west to Lind Ave. south to 431-a Street east and highway 167. Mitigation measures: dust: During evacation, compaction, and pavement work, water spray type dust control would be utilized. traffic: No off-site improvement is proposed or required, no impact is expected. Traffic control plan would not be necessary. erosion: Full errosion control measures per City standard will be implemented. other impacts: Noise and fume impact is minimal, no other significant impact. Speciality Hours Proposed: None. Traffic Control Plan: Not applicable as there is no off-site work proposed. EVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION WAIVER OF SUDiviiTTAL REQUIREMENTS rOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS LAND USE PERMIT SUBMITTAL WAIVED MODIFIED COMMENTS: REQUIREMENTS: BY: BY: Calculations, Survey, Density Work sheet 4 Drainage Cor trol Plan 2 Drainage Rep ort 2 Elevations, Ai chitectural 3 AND 4 Elevations, G-ading 2 Existing Covenants (Recorded Copy)4 .................. Existrng Easements (Recorded Copy)4 Flood Plain Map, if applicable 4 Floor Plans 3,.ND4 • Geotechnical Report 2 AND 3 Grading Plan, Conceptual 2 Grading Plan Detailed 2 King County ilssessor's.Map Indicating Site 4 Landscaping Flan, Conceptual4 ` t""` tyvt Ot""` PICa,Vt .410.4- tc�'��e. k� vtc—i c` Legal Descrip tion 4 List of Surrou(ding Property Owners 4 Mailing Label;for Property Owners 4 Map of Existir g Site Conditions 4 Master Application Form 4 Monument Cards (one per monument) , Parking, Lot<loverage &landscaping Analysis 4 Plan Reductions (PMTs)4 Postage 4 Preapplication Meeting Summary 4 Public Works Approval Letter 2 Rehabilitation Plan 4 This requirerr ent may be waived by: / 1. Property E ervices Section PROJECT NAME: 61/-14J 3 (.c,(117„h 2. Public Wo ks Plan Review Section Y./(.,270 3. Building S action DEV'=' .. DATE: � 4. Developm ant Planning Section CiO%(.);* t, r i r P h:\division.s\develop.ser\dev.plan.ing\waiver.xls REVISED 5/17/00 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISI WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS LAND USE PERMIT SUBMITTAL WAIVED MODIFIED COMMENTS: REQUIREMENTS: BY: BY: Screening Detail 4 Street Profiles 2 Hid :> Title Report or Plat Certificate 4 . ..... . . . ... ............................. .... ............................................... ... . Topography Map (5'contours)3 Traffic Study 2 Tree CuttingNegetation Clearing Plan Urban Center Design Overlay District Report 4 Utilities Plan, Generalized 2 Wetlands Delineation Map 4 Wetlands Planting Plan,4 Wetlands Study 4 Wireless: Applicant Agreement Statement 2 AND 3 Inventory of Existing Sites 2 AND 3 Lease Agreement, Draft 2 AND 3 Map of Existing Site Conditions 2 AND 3 Map of View Area 2 AND 3 Photosimulations 2AND3 This requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services Section PROJECT NAME: 2. Public Works Plan Review Section 3. Building Section DATE: 4. Development Planning Section h:\division.s\develop.ser\dev.plan.ing\waiver.xls REVISED 5/17/00 "EVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION WAIVER OF SUE ITTAL REQUIREMENTS . JR LAND USE APPLICATIONS LAND USE PERMIT SUBMITTAL WAIVED MODIFIED COMMENTS: REQUIREMENTS: BY: BY: Calculations, Survey, ) Density Work sheet 4 7- Drainage Cor trot Plan 2 ?e,---)Drainage Report 2 Elevations, A chitectural3 AND 4 Elevations,G-ading 2 ...... ....... Existing COVE nants (Recorded Copy)4 Existing Ease ments.(Recorded Copy) :............ . Flood Plain Map, if applicable 4 loi .e. " - Floor Plans 3,.ND a ,,1111c0 , Geotechnical Report 2 AND 3 Grading Plan Conceptual 2 Grading Plan Detailed 2 Fling•County i\ssessor's Map Indtcating Site 4 Landscaping Flan, Conceptual 4 Legal Descriq lion a List of Surrou 1ding Property Owners 4 _ MaJling Label, for Property Owners 4 ., Map of Existir g Site Conditions 4 Master Applic 3tion Form 4 Monument Czirds (one per monument) , Parking,:Lot C;overage& Landscaping Analysis Plan Reductions (PMTs)4 » : :Postage 4 • Preapplicatior Meeting Summary 4 Public Works 4pproval Letter 2 "y' Rehabilitation Plan 4 This requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services Section PROJECT NAME: 11/-L.lJ (eC(V,,h 2. Public Woi ks Plan Review Section Y/2/00 ,3. Building Section DATE: 4. Development Planning Section h:\division.s\develop.ser\dev.plan.ing\waiver.xls REVISED 5/17/00 • EVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS "-LANE USE PERMIT SUBMITTAL WAIVED MODIFIED COMMENTS: REQUIREMENTS: BY: BY: 7 Screening De ail 4 Street Profiles 21_ Title Report or Plat Certificate 4 s Traffic Study 2 ree Cutt�n 11f a I : : .::: :: :.: . . ....T .:. g, eget..:trvn CIPPFIRg P arl.g.. .:.......:::.:::. ::::> :..: ' ' :::;:::.. '::>::.. ::....::::.>:::A:::;>;::. Urban Center Design Overlay District Report 4 l Ufr • tl I es Plan..Garr eralized: Wetlands Deliieation Map 4 /J n Wetla ds Plar ting Plan 4 Wetlands Study 4 .� Wireless: • : . Applicant Agreement Statement 2 AND 3 Inventory Exrst►ng Sites 2 AND s Lease Agreement,Draft 2iAND 3 Map'of Existif g Site Conditions 2AN�a Map''of Vi w Area 2arma '< Photosimulstions3 This requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services Section PROJECT NAME: 2. Public Wores Plan Review Section 3. Building SE ction DATE: 4. DevelopmE nt Planning Section h:\division.s\develop.ser\dev.plan.ing\waiver.xis REVISED 5/17/00 [ CITY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the ag;ncy identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, yc u should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or"does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. Tie checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your pi oposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A . , . Environmental Checklist A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: CWX Service Center 2. Name of applicant: Kit Wong, TranSystems Corporation 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 180 Grand Ave Suite 400 Oakland, CA 94612 510-835-2761 4. Date checklist prepared: 3/29/02 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton Planning Dept 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Construction starts June 1, 2002 to December 31, 2002 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. None 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Washington State Dept. of Ecology for underground storage tanks 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. The proposed use of the 9 acre site will remain as a trucking terminal. The dock building will be reconstructed to fit modern operation. The new building will be 25,950sf which is 5,770sf less than the existing building. A new 2,040sf fuel island will also be added. 2 Errvironmvntnl Cbecidisi 12. Location of the proposal. ie sufficient information for a person t Iderstand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. 400 SW 34th Street , Renton, WA 98005 B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one), flat rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) 2% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Silty sand, sand and clay. Site is not prime farmland d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. To raise apron to meet new dock level and to raise grade at (N) fuel island. Fill consist of 604cy of aggregate base. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. NO g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? No change from current, approximately 907. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Silt barrier around existing storm drains. 3 Environmental C.lecidist 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Not significant during construction. Permanent emission would be reduced due to reduction in facility size. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. None that we are aware of. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: ( None 3. WATER a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any(surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. NC 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. NO 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in orremoved be fromr surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would d. Indicate the source of fill material. None 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. NO 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year flood plain? If so, note location on the site plan. NO 6) Does the proposal involve any disch arg d of volume of discharge. to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated NO 4 Emiron nentni Checklist b. Ground Water: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. NO 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. NO c. Water Runoff(including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters, If so, describe. The existing storm water collection system will not be changed. All storm water on pavement and site are collected. 2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. NO d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: None, existing is adequate 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: X deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other X evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other X shrubs X grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. _ What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? One tree and some shrubs will be removed for the new accessible ramp. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: A small strip of shrubs will be added at the employee parking lot. 5 Environmental Checidiat 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other N/A Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other N/A Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other N/A b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None C. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain NO d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: N/A 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Existing usage will not be changed b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. NO c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: New interior and exterior lights will be of higher efficiency than existing. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. None other than fueling dispenser spills - - 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: A 1,000 gallon oil water separator will be installed at the fuel island to capture potential spill. 6 Environmental Checklist b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Noise from truck movement on site would be the loudest generated No impact to adjacent industrial use. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Truck terminal on site and warehousing at adjacent properties. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Unknown, If so, it would be before original development in 1973 c. Describe any structures on the site. Existing concrete 2 story office building 17,000sf Existing steel frame dock building. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so,what? The dock superstructure will be demolished. A new dock building will be built over the existing dock-height slab e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Heavy Industrial f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? IH g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program c :'gnation of the site? N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentall" sensitive" area? If so, specify. No Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 60 7 Environmental Checklist j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? The existing facility is currently not in use. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: None 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. N/A b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. N/A c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N/A 0. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. Approximately 24' above grade, white metal panel b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? All site lighting are directed into the site. Site lighting will be sodium and would occur entire night. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No 8 Envirc nmental Chec!dist c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? None b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. NO c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities-to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. N/A:. t c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: N/A 14 TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. SW 34th Street, Lind Ave, E.Valley Hwy, Valley Hwy 167, 405 Fwy. No new proposed access b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? NO. Unknown c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? 65 proposed. None eliminated 9 Environmental Checklist d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not Including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private? NO e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. Yes, the adjacent property to the west is served by a rail spur track f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. See traffic study submitted g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: None 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. NO b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. N/A 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currentl available at the site: electricity natural gas,(ate3 COO MEDD telephone -eptic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. No change to current utility service proposed except capping of second fire service to dock building C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non- significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: Name Printed: 1C` fi M • 1.4#13 Date: 4( 47o Z 10 Tat.. JSrsTFivis Traffic Study for CWX Service Center 400SW 34th Street, Renton WA April 8, 2002 Purpose The purpose of this traffic study is to investigate the potential traffic impact of the proposed development at the subject site. The existing site plan is shown on Appendix A and the proposed site plan is shown on Appendix B. Floor plans for the existing building is shown on Appendix C and the proposed plan is shown on Appendix D. Methodology The existing site and structure is used as a freight"cross-dock" facility. Cross-docks are used for transferring freight from truck to truck in order to route goods coming from various points of origin and going to various destinations. No permanent storage of material occurs at the cross- dock building. Since material is not being stored, the traffic pattern is significantly different from a warehouse facility. The Institute of Transportation Engineers do not have guidelines applicable to this use. The existing facility is no longer in use, and therefore collection of specific data is not possible. However, the projection for trip generation of the proposed facility is available, and is compiled based on the Con-Way's records of customer needs in the area. The projection is included as Appendix E. For a cross-dock facility,trip generation is mostly dependent on the number of doors used for freight transfer. The methodology for comparison of the existing facility to the new will be based on difference in number of dock stations and the average trips per dock stations. The average peak trip per dock station is derived by the proposed peak trips divided by the number of proposed dock stations. Analysis The existing building has 23 bays, each at 24 feet wide. Each bay provides space equivalent to 4 truck loading docks. One bay on the east side is used for the dock office. The total number of dock stations at the existing facility is 90. The proposed facility has 19 bays and a total of 80 dock stations. The total reduction in dock stations is 10. Based on the projected trip generation,the peak trip in occurs in late afternoon with 7 trucks per hour. The peak trip out occurs in the late morning with 12 trucks per hour. The truck movement would be distributed evenly to the east and west directions on 34th Street. The average peak trip per dock station is 0.15 per hour. The total estimated trip reduction from current to the proposed facility is 1.5 per hour. This would be 0.75 trip reduction in each direction of 34th Street. 7. Report prepared by: WAS.• Marian Rule Cope 'i jt> t1 Z\r1 C. r,�- Professional Engine " ' ' F ACC {.d.wL•.i'r .r l=, ,AIA, c � rr,, mo�tt 180 Grand Avenue, SuitelztO *'OaRia�Sc •Crilifornia 34612 • Phone: (510) 835-2761 • Fax: (510)835-9839 A. L. T. A. SURVEY APPE NDIX A A PORTION OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 AND THE NE1/4 OF THE SW1/4 OF SEC. 30, T. 23 N., R. 5 E., W.M. CITY OF RENTON, • KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON Dimension Notes: Dimension Notes: (Continued) !Found tack in lead f) Southwest corner Of �- in lea Southwest 29th Street 8' cvclrxre fence 2 0' Faer of r.st l;n. ,.;. :.,,: .•... :: ....:...... :.,..„ ^. ;- �.,_• ,r wP.e[ IInB )n _ .)- -" -" _,___.,. 'ei:L• U./ East Of west line 151 water meter 2.5' East of Rost lineSt. V] --~-, Gre9f • c0 In )Z2.20 4' x 4' concrete 3) Northwest corner of building foundation 39.7' North of North line 161 Northwest corner of e- cyclone fence 0.6• East of rest line. ;w - „ column incased. of Lot 6. 171 South sags of walk 5.9' South Of North line. g m • 41 Northeast corner of building foundation 40.0' North of North lint 4 n m of Lot 6. 181 water valve 1.4' North of North ISne. ,y of ,p 5) Catch basin 0.7' North of North line of Lot 5 191 South edge of Welk 6.1' South of North line. a c: 6) Fire hydrant 2.2' East of East line. r0 400 ado (/S 2 ,•1?;�. O 20) South cage of walk B.B' Southwest of North line. 7) Fire nyarent 2.1' East of East line. 211 Catch basin 0.7' Southwest of North line. ,•1,• rci e) Fire hydrant 2.1' East of East line. 221 water manhole 1.1' Northeast of North line. SCALE. . .•..t ,• ,�, 9) Southeast corner of cyclone fence 0.7' East of East li e. ff y 1' ill•, a 23) South tape of welt S.4' Southwest of North line. w O O 1 ,� •/ ,•fr•.r- .-r Found and held /S weber 10) Fira hydrant 0.9' Nest of East line. 241 South e1 .:�;age of welt 1.4' South of North line. Q' O r/metal tap stamped 'WA -. fin Irrigation control valve 1.6' Nast of East line- 25) water sprinkler 0.4' East of East line. as N d; 7789 • CO 121 water meter 1.1' East of East line. SCALE. 60 j g �;-',r•:V `� Found punch mark in 2e1 Nortnesat corner e' cyclone fence 0.f' Nest of East line. 13) Irrigation valve 1.3' East of East line. 271 West end of 7' cyclone fence 0.3' East of East ISne. 17 1 i Found tack In a '' ,, 7'S ;31•E Vase tlfse fn eStree to 281 East end of 6' cyclone fence 0.1' Nest of East Inc.l 1 O leas in concrete l=_ 40.0 - 4.99 (� column•incased E street incased. -�� 597'Sf•fe-E ) f•, intersection. 29) Water wets 1.7' East of East line I Southwest 34th Street I 30) Neter aster 2.3' East of East line. 'NJ Asphalt I -be _ See note 6. e• cyclone fence (� I 0.2'E of line./ y�♦tJ_ adMINIMEIrrimmen See note 7. )(GATE / • See note 8. Neter sprinkler and - - d0 I v lrclgation control GATE Extruded curb Asphalt all ea. X N01 90'00'E 824.%' a See note 9. 0• I easement .. 4 1Tft3e RepocY+•i ,,, - - - xGA7EIIII See note 13. .Ikea 17 ) 1A Extruded-cwb - - :a...woo._ _72. - - 1. - _ S•a not ease _,. -. - ..•'.: far 17: saernote.l0. �Mk.. note 11. 1 1• tu 'Railroad Tracks - ..1 ^ "J CO crate i-.X I e � 1 -.__i ., •.- Q � - •• Back Of walk J 1�� .L' -J_ _ • _ - on line. .f 9 a npIa cOncrs CCv< I ti- _ e • 1-'T .. - •--_ .. rernan9 .. "'- =`•�• •-- • _ _ 1 a �� . • Dock- . • - _.-= _ _ _ _ ,.,�- i m a - ' I I o • ' • • • BockL.flOing 1 _ • • ��•' . �� ^ z Canopy tUPPOri. _ �.+.� i w/4.bollards 1 ' d Q " ` 1 ti _ Back of ralk 1 n 0.4•S of linei m WAREHOUSE (steel construction) - � \ ♦ t i 39.T • becese. sou / 0.2 line Dyenhsng k moll 3f ,� ♦1:1 'e cksif walk _-. - -- • - • • - Aoser _. . . 1- _ - - nuance way p't Ramat Vertical curbOverfienp •.w �` ~... • . . _ . ... - c _ _ - Con rate.stairs , v`oc W7t v 20. of res trfctf IXle retained . _. ... .. 1111 4 9451231295(Pestrfckfons - .. .- .. c e 9 � �: ..:ar10lnd17Y lion 1aC t• - II /�/ PoreF 1•n le O<: P _tie \Lo vault. • " ,1 • "repor?C._3tem No. 191 - t;Oncret! - Exlr C/� • m • curb 1 - • • J. • B' cyc tofw.fence_ -e at 20-Aerseo , • i I .1-"' - Extroaea cur•, 4. -1- ----_ .ConcreEe:etalts ,A I No_..7909f90532, . _ � .. - _ - Beckof fralk ..� • 0.7' o Ilse. s} __ .rs'=.1,. - - - -. - - Eatruoed curb - __ �.-. n 300'.+ - �iX N c7Rei]road trecee r -__ ____-_-___ ��_ - • See note 2. x Too hot standard A -- NOf'49'37•E B24 - ,o g I water vault 0.5'r ff - J 2.2'r of line. of lima (j-�- Tao light atenoard Water Vault J.4'r G 1 0 3.9'w of line. 0) line -----------___ -I}- - - \\\) 20 x 300' Power 15' Utflit fee See note f. �Y Easement Easement Rec. I 40, Rec. f10 No. 8012290366 7908080702 (Item 141 1 I �rP.; m I�®a°CtLnG�ffi �IlIIDt� �a¢��tlL:i�Il LT� tl� � vo �Y®o II (Item 131 •/e.EuY 4),-¢. .ae. , r \y(aA14 ill- LARSON LANs SE-NW & NE-SW 30, T23N, R5E, WM SURVEYING magi re �3 (f KCO PARTNERSHIP Cc i- !Y Sfo�e Zara Av.'w.seutn 600 EAST LIVE OAK AVENUE �,7t»•�r' :►�,�_' Federal elm WA. 96003 I- .i - 12061 1N1-7522 IRWINDALE. CA. 91706 v rffffo s KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON ' Al 1Np S S NOCDS R N LARSON t 12-15-1095; APRIL 20. 1995 ' ''' 1090 1 r-ia'`8-- S11L 1' - 30' 04�e" ++a1098 SHEET 1 OF 2 li A. L. T. A. SURVEY A PORTION OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 AND THE NE1/4 OF THE SW1/4 OF SEC. 30, T. 23 N., R. 5 E. W.M , . CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON Title Report Item Notes: Title Report Item Notes: (Continued) Land Surveyor's Certifirfitr' .__ , Recording ib. Bft53090447 far construction Of a water main ,o Knopp - Laetro - prime Partnership. Conaolloateo Fraigntwava 6-7) hews covering financial interest in the property- and appurtenances along the wetarly edge of the surveyed COrDDrati°n Of Oelarare and First American Title Insurance Company, LOT w.wFa gOUARE FT. ACRES parcel. The water Yin appears to have been constructed since This 1s to certify that this map or Plat and the survey On Mitch Lot 5 218380 5.013 B1 Item covering the tarp and Conditions of rectlr'tletl lease. The water waives, hydrants end other structures were found Mr 1! 1s Desed were q0e 111 !n accordant• wan •Nln imam Stendrd detail lease area described on 'Exhibit A' of the recorded Document the wet line. Requirements for A.L.T.A./A.C.9.M. Lend Title Surveys. )olntly174040 3.998 is the parcel surveyed. Y Lot B In Item for easements shorn on the face of the subdivision of the aatablfahed erttl adopted DY A.L.T.A, entl A.C.9.M. In 5992. Md fnc loam] 9-10) Items covring tern of title vesting and interest in the Burlington Northern Willie Industrial Park Of Renton.• The fed lteme Of Tabie A throe, end Ill) purwent to the Accuraey Total Parcel 392420 � proprtY' subdivision delineates and/or dedicates the easterly and date of 1sa ertific ti A.L.T.A. end A Survey. ono 1n effect M the northerly 10 feet of Lot 5 and the easterly and southerly 10 date of tots certification) of a Urban Survey. 1s) water easement to the City of Renton filed uncle,. King County teat of Lot 8. The easements contiguous to the common lot Description: Recording No. 7505210388. This easement lies minty within line between Lots 5 and 8 cross through the warehouse building, the right-of-way of Southwest 27th Street. never. it doge This is shown on both sheets 1 end 2. cross into the site across the north property lice. The Lot 5 and Lot 8, Black 1, riling atom Northern erillla Iorded in Perk easement Is shown on sheet 2. 18) Item regarding dedication and/or notes Mown on the face of the T _ of RMtM ts. Page !, sand 13np ec tds plat ng coon y. Wash] to n. suOdlvislon of the Burlington Northern Orillle Industrial Perk S-/O-9� 108 of Plata. Pepaa 12 and 13. Racbrtla of K1np County, Washington. 121 CountyRailr Ra ilroad reservedtfae in quit claim deed filed under King of Renton.' E. on t P.L.S. Data 30592. Easement Is tie west 20 feet glatratSM 22338 SITUATE In the County of King, State of Washington. of toe surveyed parcel and 1s shown on both sheets 1 and 2. 19) Item regarding restrictions contained on the face of the D of suodlvielon of the 'Burlington Northern Orillta Industrial Park Basis Bearing: 13) Power easement filed under King County Recording Mo. 7908080702. of Renton.' Glacier Park Company waives and relinquishes all This seeeeent affects the south 300 feet of the rest 20 feat of of its rights under the reservation with respect to the property the surveyed parcel end 1s show] on sheet 1. except for the west 20 feet. This 20 foot strip is Mown M 0 30 80 Assumed bearing of as BB' 2A' 4th Neat a1M9 the centreline of theete 1and 2. SCALE: Southwest 29th Street as shown on the subdivision of 'Burlington 14) Public utilities easement to the City of Renton filed under Value.Northern flrillia Plats. Industrialp Park of Renton' as pre Dlat filed in King County Recording No. 8012290388. This ee:es,Mt affects 201 Matters relative to the establishment of Flood Control Zone q f7 O f Volume f08 of Plats, at pages 12 and 13. the west 15 feet of the surveyed parcel and is shown on both No. 2. 1 Legend: sheets 1 and 2. 23) Itee covering exceptions which may be found by Title Company 15) walk and landscape easement to the City of Renton filed under inspections. king CountyRecording No. 0506. This easement affects 0 Monument found. visited April 15. 1995. the north 0 feet of the surveyed parcel and is shorn on sheet 2 • - Set red plastic cap steeped 'Larson 22338' -} on f4 rebar.) • - Found 05 rebar with metal cap stamped 'WA. 7589 Hebrank OR. 996.' 7t. Redlue ♦ - water va l.r ._ a For dimension notes see sheet 1 of 2. ♦ - water sprinkler Sae note 25. Asphalt ,(� _ e - Mailbox See note 27. (�1„ See note 28. Se. note 29. � I O - Flag Dole �' See note 30. Extruded curb Asphalt See note 2S. •tea Sae note 6. 8' cEc lone fence G • Irrigation control valve 1 / tfPIP. 41 HbDZr. % 0.2'E of line. aster Sae note M / • / See riot• 23. -�EJttTYded c 0 Catch basin C I°es note 2:1 / -75.00' - • •• • - San Sanitary sewer eannale . . A.38'04'00" Full • • itr' oe 111tY- - • _ L•49.83' •.i-.i5.00- SxanO x ! e RePU t - 20' Ut11 sty. • I Signal light box A•53'46'42" • item 17.1 - - easement I .) - of - Storm wannole L-32.85' e .' See note 20. - •• • • (Title Report . - Set note 19. / - - �• ,• • - Uwe 77,) -rI - 0 X Liont st andarp wy2 concrete bate. Fire control • f (r w - ! 'I•- s - water blow off • p utter. Itl� II Por 0 wuf eI rt �a•) � g, ....•- -.':.-',•. _ ••Y ..•Q aeke- J Sanitary nn p S a nttar v s er•r clean out ® - Steel lid.verticaln -oiiar0curd and -I •Soot I n - 0 " - - 0 Ra ilroad PaU sign ...t `Naterfeaetieot a �■. Xm ... ,...r;_,- - --__ I _ } Bac,•N0.=75052f038B_ - ® �. '•'' �[' - El Electric box IU �' .tea. .Citem..lil'-- _ `�' ..•. - _ m - - - Q. • - �. • Sate post a) •a' y1• Railroa r• m ..•'. oading. 1•"..•-.•i Concrete ♦ - -Clock- . • • .>:i P. m � .. - • __ Ovarnen�7 '•: u. _ , .t •i .`. _ 1 �V- .t m IV w --v . d• . I r� ,.. : I • Asphalt 03 z a• ,. • -e Lanool liupor; •• a • Extruded curb al m cdldpr support - . 4 _ .-, ';0.'; .M/A Pollards ' w � n O 1 f2 pollards - • Water aannale Air c o r erase e O v. Shed • • • m Qj ^ N p • • ••, 39.7' �= Surveyor's Notes: 8 .�-' ?6 - 11 Building location ion dimensions are as measured at right�-. 10• Walk end _ -i. 'f• _ _ .,•_:-'. n •Oren ran -- men angles from landscape ti - _ g ee.note. "`'y-`:"`� property line to building foundation at positions lnolcated. easement Rec. J • - 20' Railroad • . :(�-. 0 2) Utilities other than those shown may exist on e t HO. 8101120508 •- - i this site. Only o I (Item ees•eent Rec. ) those witch ere visible r having visible evidence of their -.1 II a 15) No. 7903130592 -.Stm. --2Q a!TsaCyyc tiona seta lnetl - . installation are Mown hereon. (Item 12) _ 9aiG28t1296�1Re,ti• dC J 31 Thia survey represents pnYs lca] Improvement :::::::fl.3d:7te:::rcn e.2B'� I I v /�A y..1 I Se note 18. J O - exl,tfd Apr11 18. 1994, the tlete pf this fie Y Y•• •• cy•t lone?mode. 9e 4) Full reliance fr legal desCrlptions antl recsemntr• • d • _ ._n.Pert.Stem 1b ]91. - .J 1O _ 0. 1995. I _•?__-- �'�- _-- __ • - --•_ �_ �`el I o • been pieced on the to ird report of the Firsten tl• -- '( \• I n • InsuranceCompanyALT4 Cpae,tnent prderNo. h - -,,,` _ �- 51 This survey was acc0nplisneo by field traverse ��' c - - �. �- --- utilizing a three (3) secpn° tne°tlolite with integral I- distance measurin meter (Geodlmeter 510 N.). Linear --]• Extruded'cur.'- I' and angular closures exceed slate standrds. MI See note �7. e note 16. - 9 30' See note f5. � I of line. Water v ,lt O.S E See note 14. -_- L 15' es Utilities r Railroad tracTcs --- Easement Rec. 7 Na. 8012290366 f/� Top light standard I Sae note 2. m (Item 14) `C 2.2'N Of line. 111: a�11ibnn M®notlin ,'um �� anQ� LARSON LAND SE 4100-NW Sc NE-SW 30, T23N, R5E WM e1 u J ��III°� ®o Il ��' SURVEYING =WateKCO PARTNERSHIP ]ioaa Zan°Ave,w„south600 EAST LIYE OAK AVENUE c ',��t1. FedereI Mer. MA 9a003 '(.1: 121ta 1. (gem 9e1-7W] IRwINOALE. CA. 9006 ref shy- JI• , 1 C,+1 Ii`O y 1110 R S WOOD, I�'t N LARSON KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON cram t2-t0-199a; iu! APR IL 20, f995 n ]Ogg SHEET 2 OF 2 APPENDIX B H ,0 I (E) FENCE N ,8' 45' 77' 60' 60' 60' 66' 105' 432.5' I.4.1,..1./fq,UUT,71 co i n ,,r -_,I--- -1. rGi .° �¢ OSTAGING STAGING I. I ' Ao 25 wi �� • � I ' <�� Z Et _. . (E) FUEL L4FUEL O O _ ® y IL.,ISLAND ^- = man ISLAND O 22 © 0a r• • • • l. Q 0 . • .2 <• 7• . (+.� -F' _- -- - SAZNO .y\,y. . � x �o� Vi' .' Ai A it, ~¢' �' o `� I} I .II� j y r `� NEW DOCK ® •LE* \ �x< �m,, I. - _E I ,3 `. 1,. �.�//� .-. 25,980 SO FT (E) OFFICE • >e k ® ail r 11 l/ � _ BUILDING __ 127' 25' IZ� 125 i3II`r�{'„ ® 28 FT TRAILER O • • • ' t• • y003 -W"- yc A -4 t O: - 84' STAGING '.': w' ...� �.. _ _ =i r� 'ai. IC. .• BUILDINGLO O • 1.I CP I 136' I X ra:..__:.. iv L yI B ! L MIN. ® .. - n ..- i' . a f . 2 { 8 l Q_ in -I O n wr.rsre war - Hm wa��.:., •.76. ."' .... �, \ 26 0 (E) FENCE LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SITE PLAN 0 10 _ _so' 100'so' LOTS 5 AND 8 IN BLOCK 1 OF BURLINGTON NORTHERN ORILLA SCALE 1" = so' PARKING AND LANDSCAPE DATA: INDUSTRIAL PARK RENTON DIVISION NO.1. ACCORDING TO PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 108 OF PLATS AT PAGE(S) 12 AND 13, IN TOTAL SITE AREA = 392,408 S.F. KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON REQUIRED LANDSCAPING (2%) = 7,848 S.F LANDSCAPE PROVIDED = 24,346 S.F. EMPLOYEE PARKING AREA = 31,565 S.F. REQUIRED PARKING LANDSCAPING = 1,578 S.F. PARKING LANDSCAPE PROVIDED = 3,124 S.F. (9%) KEY NOTES: LEGEND: PARKING: MIN. MAX. O CONSTRUCT CONCRETE PAVEMENT. 14 INSTALL MONUMENT SIGN. SEE DETAILS 9. 10. 12 AND 14, 0 METAL SIGN POST COO SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE 15,300 GROSS S.F. OFFICE 45.9 68.9 SEE DETAIL 4, SHEET YC 40. SHEET YC 49. ❑ ELECTRIC METER ow• STAND PIPE 25,980 S.F. DOCK 17.3 17.3 O REMOVE SECTION OF (E) FENCE IN THIS AREA. 15 SEE STRUCTURAL PLANS FOR RAMP DETAILS. - COLUMN FLANGE ® JUNCTION BOX TOTAL: 63.2 86.2 INSTALL (N) END POST AT SIDES OF OPENING. 16 ACCESSIBLE PARKING. SEE DETAIL 1, SHEET YC 42. GAS METER PROVIDED: 65 •' FIRE HYDRANT O NOT USED W GAS VALVE o GATE POST 17 INSTALL CHAIN LINK FENCE, SEE DETAIL 12, SHEET YC 47 cy 0 IRRIGATION CONTROL VALVE D4 WATER VALVE 0 REMOVE (E) GATE AND INSTALL CHAIN LINK FENCE 0SEE ARCHITECTURAL AND STRUCTURAL PLANS FOR STAIR ® MONITOR WELL ® WATER METER NOTES: IN THIS AREA, SEE SHEET YC 47. AND ACCESSIBLE RAMP DETAILS. O POST INDICATOR VALVE WATER MANHOLE 5 INSTALL 4'-0" WIDE MAIN GATE. PK NAIL DS • 2.5" CAST IRON DOWNSPOUT 1- SEE SHEET GC 01 FOR GENERAL SEE DETAIL 5. SHEET YC 47. 0NOT USED "' CIVIL NOTES AND LEGEND. © INSTALL (N) SLIDE GATE TO ACCOMODATE (N) 60' OPENING, ® REBAR & CAP FOUND Qp POWER TRANSFORMER 2. SEE SHEETS YC 00 FOR SURVEY. SEE DETAIL 8, SHEET YC 46. 20 NOT USED 0 SCRIBED "X" 0 CATCH BASIN 3. SEE SHEET YC 02 FOR DEMOLITION PLAN. O NOT USED (� ® STORM MANHOLE CONIFEROUS TREE 4. SEE SHEET YC 03 FOR OVERALL 21 INSTALL LIGHT POLE BASE. SEE DETAIL 16, SHEET YC 48. 8 (E) STORM DRAIN INLET. FOR INFORMATION SEE SHEET YC 05. SEE ELECTRICAL PLANS FOR DIMENSIONS AND LOCATIONS. LUMINAIRE SITE LAYOUT. .) ,--0 . DECIDUOUS TREE 00BUILDING OVERHANG. SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR .a. 5. SEE SHEET YC 04 FOR GRADING WOOD SIGN POST O CONSTRUCT 1'-0" TRACTOR AND TRAILER PARKING INFORMATION. o IRON PIPE (FOUND) AND DRAINAGE PLAN. BUMPER. SEE DETAIL 1, SHEET YC 43. 0 4" WIDE YELLOW PAINTED PARKING STALL LINES. SEE ® MONUMENT IN CASE (FOUND) ii 2 NEW ASPHALT 6. SEE SHEET YC 05 FOR UTILITY PLAN. 0 -REMOVE AND REPLACE (E) CURB WITH (N. TACK-ON CURB. DETAILS 1,2,5 AND 6, SHEET YC 50_ TYPICAL. 7. SEE SHEET YC 0-6 -FOR EROSION 500`F. ZOO' tiV SOIL IEST HOLE ASPHALT OVERLAY CONTROL PLAN. 05'-0" WIDE YELLOW PAINTED PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY. o SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT 11 SEE STRUCTURAL AND FUELING DRAWINGS FOR FUEL SEE DETAIL 10. SHEET YC 50 8. SEE SHEET YC OS FOR DRAINAGE MAP. ISLAND LAYOUT AND UNDERGROUND FUEL STORAGE x SPOT ELEVATION TANK DETAILS. 25 DEMOLISH (E) DOCK AND CANOPY SUPERSTRUCTURE. CONCRETE PAVEMENT 9. SEE SHEET YC 09 FOR JOINT LAYOUT PLAN. 12 TRASH COMPACTOR (NIC). SEE MECHANICAL PLANS FOR 26 DEMOLISH (E) DOCK FOUNDATION. ASPHALT OVERLAY 10. COORDINATES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE INFORMATION. BASED UPON COORDINATES PROVIDED BY THE SURVEYER INCA ENGINEERING, INC 13 INSTALL FLAG POLE WITH 4 - 6" DIAMETER BOLLARDS, BELLEVUE, WA SEE DETAIL 4,6 AND 7, SHEET YC 48. ..•� xx "'""°` CITY OF 400 SWCW 34THVICE CENTER H ST RENTON, WASHINGTONITY 04/05/02 Dame __ "� RENTON �" x PK DATUM I YARD LAYOUT PLAN YC-03 4.0:Kw u111 fO1x I 1111 Planning/Building/Public Works Dept. .wm.• ans1p1•rmt 011:0r NO. REVISION BY DATE APPR es ■x Y/11/02 User: prkoXRef A \ \ \ \ A A', 03/1 t/02 15:19:37 XRef Files: G:\OK02\501020004 Renton\Site\xcsite - 031102.dwg G:\OK02\5010200u4 Renton\ShdredDotd\xbdr22x34-arch.dwg � t APPENDIX C . , 1 , •••••:.• ",'"''''''""'"'" ..)..1"...lass........• ,;,...•....;14-; .,„,•S.....r_Ty. 11 Til ! : .....•.•• .• 4 . _77.. .......--:-44--. -4 ---- ,....3............,..... d.e...$4 an.-.no -t-'.. H • I ZI I 1.1 •-•'''. 4 /---- - A Am a.m..•AIIII0••• ....min."........ / I'. . ' ••••1........ere -,r- 4 t•st.escr"Mu. I LA... .1 111 il • --...„-- 1.............o. ..._11t. ... .......-• --- -J. .ar.....5...._,.. - .••••.-- •-• ,; ! '6. -7... }.- - -'--=--- '-' .,.„.. CS•11.vacno- 4_ ......ji:, t'r ' I ;P.,-"..731.,• . '. •: -••••n -•"- 1 i...4".. ..---:_.4Eili ...t. ---- . .I. ZEI.../4 .1... • OR' 4 , ' • _......, I....•••: ..1 '',.....L:_1......I 4,,,-.1 ',I...•on 1 -..., / - '-''' il.- -wag.;•11. ,,,•••••••••••••••••• if:v..I•..scr ...- .:.. 4,j "mom. ....••••'ft.. t...Cmr, - ...t..-"ir...r'r. . I . th7 0 .:.. ... ' \....,..., ' tr.;;;. • I - •a.• ...........,.....1 ____.6. ,'; k. . :..:' ...Le' .,-.. SECTICs.1 ev .4.11 '4".. _ _l__--____ - .4 [....,i,..... _,..‘___. ,-.1..-,,,,,...,.....„:„ .7.-`,2R ,..1.....P.J Z.D•••ral._ ---......,.. ..1. OP FF_ 1.40•SE vcaLvE 3....-. •.- . ..,:-...: . .......,..‘..,- - SELTIONI A/IS yi.oci f.1 -64 ......,,.. ___ ..,1,,...7-* 7."'•!'"^". ....• sans...... nen.•••••..f. _ _ ----___ -- -2.-1 - c....L. ,an.el,MI.t.."Ai . I -r 1 r-M 41115 M...E.VA:n01,1 SeCrioni -- :;,..-,1,,..• 4;.'7P - --__•_'' o _. o , .... o .. ® „A..- ri) - 1.0 b) 24 0 e .... ...-...-:-.,.. .,-,3„ ._..:::-4 7;.'•.--- • 24•.• 2.tel 2.4<__- PS :AO 24'0' e: '.'.; •''' .4.::."( 1 1 f I C. --.,:-,..::: • ti.:2•.... . ,r7....---.. . . .a-a=,-.:,---- ---.- --L-- -1 -....-r-' .---_--, _ __L___-•-_-_---_-_-_--24_.-- - ------ -. - _ _ •• __ ••_ V.... ':' -.-•::-".4-:.•-.-; --1---' . "..... ree.=Pm ma ..: • . ....!- •- i. . I ,•( -r l) () ® 1 @ I ® r -•,.: ..-:-,.: 1._ -.-,-. i • i • i l• . • . _- --mpg • • • • • ,,_ .- ., . : -t.:-•.- • - -:•-. - : "7••... ...:• : •- _ • , ... • . ; © . . . . . • • • . • • . . r"' '1 -- ;-r- r--•117 r--i i-.. 1 a j:.2.0 1.,1 I I 1 .,- I- .• 1. L-1,..] ,.1 ri :71:2r1 - .. i-ri ri 1--] - • . -1, r---; p.....-g. 1'. "7.. r.Z1 ,,,--.1 1-,..77..,--1,.--1..,.. ,1..4 r--. 1---,. 1--1 r. • . • • .,-'• -; 1-.": •--7 ..-7-,--i.,- i 11-1-1 1 t 3 -H , • - t- 1 il -TRH- I 1 I ! 9717'r....! .,-••••,. 4J r .- 1:-:. . 1 1 -1 1 .1. • '7 1 1 ' i 1 1 4 I -1 I 1 i• I i i , r• I I ; .. -I I 1 •l' .L 4-'M.1:71'I 1-i I I I. I .1 1 t i•4 1 "` '''. '-"I'' . .I.I 71"r I in. !-, -1 7-: ir:1, ,r71: fri 1-1 tr-1•4 .1 ,-:--- ....:1-..-1 .1: t i. : r .4 -1*1 • I 14._.. 1 .1. 1 . . 111.- iii111111111 ; 11 Iii, ii 11• 1 : 1 11 171.` "w1-.'411111111 ' 1 :4•-17.4.1.11-.1. 1-1 1. 11 ! 111:111 rl 4 1r I 1[111111 11 l '' 1111111p:11 ; All 1. ; ' I I I • 14.11 '1. L 4- I j i 1 . I 11 .1 • II -I III ! i . .. C..S.-". t•P‘',.:! '.; ,,,;,,. ..,.:!. ..1se.....:14 L. L-1.12,J .,_4_-i Li .1. I.Li ',Lid _i•-ii._.., L.: L :.'_.‘j Li Lr..14 r4,+- ; 1 ,- ;'-1. I I.--t1 1 r. 1,---I, -L ; LA LI. L! J. 1 .10,••11 :J .' ; ! !• :: • ;:i I 1 ..,....... ......1. . . . . . • . • : .... , • . . . . . , ‘ _.., L-.J•S..- t..S. .L-4. ••L.....1 1.L-..., L-.21 L..: ....:I L..: L .L-j .-1•L 11.-1, L-J • • 1 . i - I• art 1 I I, 1•1 .41.1 i 1 !. .., !. ,.... -,rit,.(71- 5 ;71- r-T! r•i: 171 ,---1 ..r-7. r--.r• ;--.-1.. r--;• r--, r •I r-; r-1 r-Li j._ ___ , r_ ... . ... ._. "r6c4.,...GuZ......2...,E • r E -3.......... , i . . 4...?....;4 4: ...: .;yr ,....1 .. . . I. i .. 1 i .. i IL . . , 1 1 . 1 Ix :c*...2..7.......IF;,........E.7 .7. i 1 . ,•••7. r-1.r--1!r-i r•-1 r-r r--1 1---1 .17--t r , , 1 --ra i 1 .••••• . • .1 • . . ; : ; r I I, ' 1 .1 s I I.• I I. I._1 i. I J... . l'.... •Fli rT, r ill T....1 7--; r:-; r-io T--; r-1'r-- r-10, -1 r--t 1 i l'i .11 I I• ,1 •• • . i , si1. 11111Iii1 III- , iirli „, 11. , :vh , ? ; ! : , . , , ,.. 11 ;; ;, 11..1 . .. ... .„ , .1. __ ::1;I-- L.-: 1 1. 1 _I:1 .1 .r:1 .r 1 i-i I" i :1-- I 1 1 '::::-.'":1--z.-."-----"1-7:4) II II Is ; 7 i ,..,...).; $r ;0 ,1_4: 1. 1.f.t..1 .1.. , 1. i. t 1 •1. 4 1 i 1 .1 1 1 i Es,,,,-.1..........7.7, -, . 1 1 . , iii i 1 ! 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 i 1- 1 -1 r 1 1 1 1. L-1 i 1- 1 i 1--1 - - , . . 1....,....t.. _•;...; i .1 ; . i I ; • I IA ' ' .' I ' , iiii., 1J , , , iiii -i -iif . -. • . :., iiiiiiiiiii. ilirli •ir:11 : • , =r ;...,5,-..,...,,,,,, ,...,_,,,,t.,,..Lti...,37:27k.:_-:,....t rL:17-..y. 774_177'-L,_,J•.-t..,...4.77. 7______71... ....24 ___._ .,11 rif...-.L1...._111_._1_1__.1 Li I.,' I___I L.2, i_i_L_.: Li L_J-Li __11__I I. i. ' 1 .1 U 1.-J -Li Li'L I I- ' 1' 1 ' ' ' ' 1 .1. 1 1 ii" 1 .1 1 1 ' .4 L--I 1...- L-J .• ;:_li r.,-.....-.1 a...J L....„ 1.....I' 1.-- i..... 1....0 II I.-. Li L f I'L l' I m'Ll ET i .1 I. " I 1 1 .j 1 1 ' I ! I I I .1 1.111 ,___...... ______...., ,-___I--g_t.--Li..-.. Li Li ,_.___Is ....r I ...F--•••: -• it • _ . . • _ . • . . . • • . • -1 r . . . _ r-- . . ---, , 7-. --r-.. -7 . 41' 7••\.-.......1.0. . ' • - . :, . . • '• ... . . 1 • . .. . . F ' 'f..1,i, 'Ir.: • . . .. . • . - ..... . • . . • ;c,(-Ns;s. nrY X••• ' • • ' - ...N.*,eons..4...... ; . . . • • .',;it":'• - i.'•,•.... A..:T.- • • ' L..-r"+•:. ... ."41k-'''.1 .r.. ,................: ...Q.. , 0 „ , . . . 1••••.rime- - - • • • . ... .......ea..,5.1a - '...- . .".1-..• '.. " 1 . I CMS SR.11 ."4:......., -:. ...... ...-MeeC .....--------------,------.=.-.--..--.--.--.. -•-• -.-r• ...- 1.. -...-.----=----- - -1-- -.. L _.____ _ ...00.,_,,.-....r._-_-_________-______ ____-•___ -__________ _____ ____ _L • •:7,•-• N•i--& . • .- - . . , el.;'.-___,=‘, r.s--.. • - .r.ir •;. -s--,,,,-,-;.• ..r1...-.4-,-;".-,L r PART i AL F!rnR.. FL 0 AN ,'•.i,. . .----ti?... 'j.•...-f'.1".1::-..--.... • , - ...•• -. - .4....17;1:: -dt,.:;',':•;. • . : ._. 7, • = • -.. . .. -••411f ;V;': '.. U.1;'7, ,,:.• '....":•t..' . -„k"...1!•-.,.--!:: '.:',-. '-.• • 411 3 141:1-4!mt.... Xf....-1 . .;':*••-,.. ..: , ... .----- ':•.4-47.;•-**7,.1.:7•3• N E> 4:7- • 1. . . . • `:•,' --f. -...%. ;*Z-•,„if! 1 ... . . ,..... 51-4- - ' ''''' ':''. . t. . . .,,..;••; .---' ',- KIRK-Di-A. CARAAIN Al.A. ARCRITECT t _ . . F F,e ! GAT T .':AdAINAL FOC. 1.-.7 •••11 .......... v L3ADt14 a _DOCK, PLAN _ :: 715510.. ....:.. las,,!.• 314.-.T.7. ;"*.m.• .......;z:z.t. _ ir IA ....„. _ . . . A jiL KU.E.- Et il 1 L DING SUPERIOR FAST FREIGHT - ... 14 -Llft. SOU TR 5 ECTIC7•K I f ZO-61 G Z 5-1 21 1- RENTON. W A514 INC7TON ....__-, _ r wr-t ..--... ._ -,:.`•. . - '' Mal•:'. 1 U.7.....:4 1.'t 42 rW.-, - • . _ - _ - __ _ _ - 30 I 30x 1- _ _ • ' • • 1"'r• • a`- &r- • 1/•.• Y • � L3 -:ar .�+►:� sr-`:,}ice" • < / � � X • - I 1__ / I! 1 fr • � - I t• a 0'1. „ ri *47iiii7 ir' - • 1 Se tem.& rv..o v. nt.r.r -- F r • SC F '•w . r `� .• '='s' rr..Y..uz. rna.a ®l it rut' • �.�} • 4 i` s" < ly '.tom »�.�r e. ::,1 T•+ t^t.,,s. ' SE T10N A/Ito•4ti•:-o p: -'4 1zre. _:il[JO 7 TO riVO)Iw qop'-d i...r. . 'S. • } ••s • . t - ,....... 2tb' 9 ue i40 Lo.• T �^ --__ }• _:". $"i ?-?his d { I �o �o 10 :±o- uo_ S . --7 .v.e.:- _ . Y ii-j....... J- ....▪ ...#1.08•Tas yryiYji �^f+./ J �r • T n 1 I ►+ .saz'difwr. .... ama.-Imilmv.r.....---a- ar-smin- -scar T— ,-a—....-------...--- ----••--..- -..-- • _ t•as trill.: .s"� . rZ�_—_lam" - l� Y I f=.. . ^a—. -•4�`° I _ �' I-R':•S:�t ty•F<..� 1 -- r � '• . •• '�' • lr•.f.�lr��r1 ttaa.aw.r.a 0.........11. t ,...........111.....1 — .. "•..•• GIwiT. .` �s y. • x S• ,-�7-- •• .r �:a�.•. Z f- .• 1 f ;'tiy_ rtt, Y i ••` f _I, r\ -'- ir• "•i n r" 'T- I. - ..w+•ri• r_�"-flTlj 4• �-� t i, '.A;N *P.-Mil l jj I 1 ■ .i 1 1. r"'{ ; - r { r , • . r1r71R� ` / _—! ` l• i :. � I k+g ,r 1 Hi-. I , v 1 1 11I.. 11 I I .1I [ r.J1i ! '1- I { r ram..r`r r-1• r? r i ►-1 r-t r-, - j;:IK r I 1 r::.1 { I- 1 '+1`�" 1 1� 1 I • i 'I .1 1 I [ I I: , I + �+ r'f !�� r i C`i- },_? ' Ls ;1 .' ' j� '-1 I '(j r 1 I I I I I f '" r' �'1 I r 1 I , 1 :1 I• , r�.I .l "!. 1 I'- I 1 I 1 1 . 1. 11 I .I I. i I 1 I 1 1 i 1 ► I .. '�r` n, .oC ==�. r .>� 'h,i_ 'i"I'- -r,T LSt:�it"I.I. i-1 I j. 1 .I I ,I .1 I I I 1 1 1 1 •1 1 I I .I I I -I I :i 1t1 I I f 1 .I I I 11 1 i l l l 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 I. I• I _ I c:M1 ..1(•'_• • ¢- ar. 4- - u.:a- 1 1 .I..1 IL '� 1-,I. I .I 1 .I I ' ! {: I I i I I r:I:•"l,I 1 .I .I I I I I I 1 I I �• i..I.: I II I Li i + 1 I I11 S.'1• 't{:. ' - - oe ; 1.1 f--� ♦-L1_ �J L LJ �_4 .LJ • gI.'1.•1 I I I 1I•.I "I I .J1 ' -j 1j :t•.I�I 1 ! 1 I� 1��jj �' 1�7� : aJ L-J 1_J' l �' 1[� �1 } t 1I I I1 1 1. �p.-r •_z'2o..,,:..- �Y>:r_zv� . k.. - • . : . J L:.: ._� L LJ L.t'•L.J aJ"-`: �-1 i- Iut 1' 1 ..; ,. I .I 1 ftor ' C': I f ►�� '_. _ I )�.-...i.wr , I l ~ ,v'r.�.t t 7 ir t lyr.a..�.w,r. o • - . J L• '+.?. •/ �1r • ' , - -f f"I f III 1 I . 1 'r 1 . �' . t *-, , i 1 , I ..... J ..� n :1 I •I" I f r, r� r s C I I I 1 I ( I ( I I' I ".I 1I t 1 1 �' II i. ," i-"j ; rzr-z — Ia I I a1i } I I JJ = 11 --1 - I 1- I , I 1 I I . 11 .1 .. 1 ,1I 1i )• • __ �_- - 't I: �. 1i 1 1 'Irj '� 11 •1 .ti il�`TI�I11 I i I � � 1 "� i �.�1jII�III j: jtt � ,j i � ) 1i 'a��'�!�.�..I. i ZF,� ut i5',>r --,.: ,■ •-r �-1 _�..� _ ►,.5 'i �"y.. ....▪..<r } .1 I 1 .1 1 I I I I I.1 1 [I 1 "I i I I 1; I 11 I I i t 1 t?I...r 1 I. I 1 I :; .a - - :..�--:. ® ': r.�.� "1 4_1 •u �1 -j �_ ' i 1 I 1. 1 ' i' I ' "I 1 -` 3,� �k ` ,, .. , { 1 I. I . ��.�...+:�:rL_ll LJ L. 'L_ LJ L_ _ 1.� u 1 L_. r' L I +j 4 t t _1 : .t' YE"""'` �� rl yt,t.: al.rr • _ • - 1 t 4"'I -L� ��A! 4 .. ®S♦ r•.I O►• ''YY�•�'.�.ap• �' • i.t-,.11 ® • - • - t I / r„ •I } . t s : 3:a'*='''�.5... ram 5». . `. • •• + 1 t M.,ram • �'• ! _- $z�'ity'.,1 {dN•�4. f _ _• .4.. .. I • I. -' _.7-;1 • - k• {:.� ... r-*;.••e G� u N `�'�v�..ea'�ae s.e s a..•� � -1 • t `- PARTIAL P`L C,T2 .iQ ` �a arrrw� — _ �i 3s .tF'.... PLAN $ • ESL' y,F,.� t.:'.S�t ti E_� "� • i' f-t- Y " ESN 1 xC.:• ;4` 1=).-1 r 'A CA&Mik. -A".I.A. A.RCu-(TEC.T ; S E I G i-i T T E .S .I, I N A L = o R . '°'� •jf.. L 0 A D I N 3 DO : i. FLAN 32 . • a-RTN AV_EbfU.E" . 6.U7Z D1 � 6 SIJPERIO ,7, FAST FI,EIGN i -ip� , li. T :' .wxyk"' i► W A. 96[Ql:i'_.(2o6j::G2'S -7221 E •• , :;,r. RToN, w a sHINGTON '�4e NORTH SECTION - . � —' w.i ; !r ox3. ..—.. ....i yi... l-- -- . ^l : rt�. ..., • •wry< www� ,. COLUMN 1 I COLUMN 2 ] COLUMN 3 r COLUMN 4 APPENDIX D. 28 25 Q1 23 22 IQ 20 1, 18 17 16 15 0 13 12 11 0 [ 9 1 l , 0 • r2-0" '-0' •-0" •-0" 22' 0' 22' 0" 22' 0" 22-0" 27' D' 1-O I I J 4._D• OVERHANG 5'-6- I1'-0" '-6 TYP. DOCK0" 7'-2' 3'-a' _ VMPER LOCATIONS I�6 o PIPE BOLLARD. I SEE DTL. 15/DA 42. T STNDAR 44 SEE DEL -- 1 1 r 7 1 r -- ------1---------------r------1--- -------r------ ------ ------- ------1------- -------r-------- 1 r ® - 75 ® m 6❑7 61 5 57 55 El ,r� 51 49 m 43 m m173713❑5 3❑3 ® ® 27 2❑5 23 21 n I17 --� ® ® m � ❑7 E. .© 0 [�"� A fr'r1 ��1. .h �(. .11 I r� 1...g.1 1,r-� �y. .t An —r} ('�� I m q [ a / • a a .. a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a • o ��(F.E. F.E F.E. F.E. F.E F.E. F E F.E. F.E. F E. - O 8li �� MANIFEST TABF. ;\ n .1' L I IB „P/ SEE DT, `FE FIRE E%T NCUISHER AT �'___ I a EVERY(AD]ER_MOUNT ON _... .-... ._ __ _._ —_ — __ _._ - CU 01s3051TE SID OFZ`aL.�N -"" —_ -- __ __ _-. _.-. .� _._ .- -- __ -- ____ —. .� ___ __ __- .__ -__ _._ ..__ __ .._ __ ..._ __ • OPPOSITE SIDE OF DOCK a r, 3 1 I LOADING DOCKII En - I �.I I I r I I I I (PROVIDE FLOOR HARD I I I I I GUARD L,SEE /! m PEE SPECIFICATIONS EVER / 'I c n SECTOR DESK I I DIRECTION OF LIGHT DOCK FIN( SECTOR DESK I I OIL 10 DA 42 o I �_FE. L J FULL LENGTH OF DOCK FLOOR FOR CONTROL JOINT �• OSHA YELLOW PAINT I (E)DOCK LOCATIONS,SEE STR CT L_J n STRIPES ON DOCK FLOOR 6'N/ell �I;I O 2'-0'O.C. 8 BORDER 8 DESK COMM.&DAT 3/Px5'-6"xB'-O'HISCONCRETE CURB fa AS SHOWN UNISTRUT FOR SECT R PLYWOODDESK COMM.&SECT DTL 5�DA 42 f. MOUNTING OARD UNISTRUT FOR SECT j ELECTRICAL I ... 'j I FOR ELEC.PANELS _ I'• PANELS Ft] � �q�� SEEELECTRICAL B 1-0 1-0 ,I DRAWINGSL ' 0 0 22'-0'BA ""%II I I-l�-.E_--Q.- -�I�.E. ,j._E - -•I.•-_La If.E . I —.I�-- -+(.— �.FE _.4.- FE - I -�•— f E. _.� n Z /'�. _ —I -4. V- -V -m V - ►`-'' . ._�- -Q -I- _ Q- — —4- -�' -II — `_ Q- - Imo- —Q-' _'II —1T` �Q //I�� / uL. LI Lc •AU KA -71 i"f-�1-fl1 1=1-n�1:7l1 _ d-ul��J LA IL{{11 Al t. dt., rtT a-16 d-LR .�I. d-t .r�� h_ u l(Z e h_� I _ 9 H 72 70 68 66 64 62 I I 58 56 54 52 m a8 46 44 42 ® 38 36 I34i I32I 30 28 26 2a 122I 20 18 n r1 1z 10 rs 1 © Da 0i f 1 I!' 9 L I ,....a 3_ m 7 a3_ 11 W LAD R GRAB BAR, / OVERHANG OVE- I d 0. j; ' WEATHER-RESISTANT SEE 8/DA 42 I �) LT- ELECTRICAL PANEL CABINET.SEE ELEC. 19 Ii NOTE STAIR/7,SEE OIL / BUM 1/OA u n DOCK FINISHED FLOOR 1. LOCATE DOWNSPOUTS AT 6-o PPE BOLLARD. ___,„/ 4-D• ELEVATION EVEN-NUMBERED GRID LINES. SEE DTI_ 15/DA 42. 100'-6" = XXX• 2 LOCATE LADDERS&GRAB BARS (Ti SEE SITE PLANS DOCK FLOOR PLAN Z AT ODD-NUMBERED GRID ONES. 3. FOR CONSTRUCTION JOINT LOCATIONS. O SCALE: 1/t6'K. 1'-0" SEE STRUCT. CO 4 PROVIDE FLOOR HARDENER, SEE SPECIFICATIONS. • 04/05/02 PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUBMITTAL REV -UA!E -- OLSC.RTPTION DRW: SUBMITTAL 03/01/02 CWX SERVICE CENTER FACILITY PROJECT NO. 501020004 4' 400 SW 34TH ST V ¢ RENTON, WASHINGTON 3 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0 ce W CON-WAY TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, INC. 110 PARKLAND PLAZA ANN ARBOR, MI 48203 PHONE (734) 769-0203 =AX (734) 214-5650 180 GRAND AVE, :(1: TeewSvs-rErvis�\\ SUITE OAKIAND, CA 94612612 CGl?jo�/?AT�O/V (510) 835-2761 FAX (510) 835-9839 SHEET TITLE FILE NO.DA01 dwg OWN:PRK SHEET CEO: KW DOCK FLOOR PLAN DATE. DA—01 12/05/01 )A01.DWG User: prkoprolev 3/05/02 18:37:48 XRef Flies: G:\OK02\501020004 Renton\SharedData\xbdr2_x34-arch.dwg APPENDIX E SERVICE CENTER NAME: RENTON,WA I l TRAFFIC COUNT: PROPOSED TRACTOR/TRAILER ACTIVITY DATE: Time Period Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thrusday Friday Saturday From To OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN Midnight 1:00 AM 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 1:00 AM 2:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2:00 AM 3:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3:00 AM 4:00 AM 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 4:00 AM 5:00 AM 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 5:00 AM 6:00 AM 0 0 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 6:00 AM 7:00 AM 0 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 7:00 AM 8:00 AM 0 0, 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 8:00 AM 9:00 AM 0 0 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 9:00 AM 10:00 AM 0 0 7 3 7 3 7 3 7 3 7 3 7 3 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 0 0 12 3 12 3 12 3 12 3 12 3 12 3 11:00 AM Noon 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Noon 1:00 PM 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1:00PM 2:00PM 0 0 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 0 0 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 0 0 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 0 0 3 7 3 7 3 7 3 7 3 7 3 7 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 0 0 2 4 2 4 2 4 2 4 2 4 2 4 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 8:00 PM 9:00 PM 00 9 0 9 0 9 0 9 0 9 0 90 9:00 PM 10:00 PM 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 02 10:00 PM 11:00 PM 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 11:00 PM Midnight 0 0 1 4 1 4 1 4 1 4 1 4 1 4 I W YJ ,', ,„,A.,-.- kf't„ d, \,!.t 4J /\. , i ' ri..rl.,, -S4. a J� !7l J, /7 .SS,l,\71 pJ J r 'J.; t �' i> � ' �` 1, y '' V CO � a sc_ ,, s $ '�. VOLs a o �a , ;t , ,�. �.,a�. nn.�- l;.;m.� k.,�,>• k.ta, ,m, `"�.,�. '��. � � � .7p�• �.r�J �•.r�.• �,7�, na, �,�.� 4.r�,� �', .. .4\ Form No. 1056.92 , ! �tiy (10/17/92) ` 1/'- �a ALTA Loan Policy • Form 1 • - { POLICY TITLE iNSURANCEA t ISSUED BY American Title Insurance '" • :. tf:'';bt SUBJECT TO THE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE, THE EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE CONTAINED IN SCHEDULE B AND ,.p; .g.' 1._ THE CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS, FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY a California corporation,herein called _:. ` ',=>,a the Company,insures,as of Date of Policy shown in Schedule A,against loss or damage,not exceeding the Amount of Insurance Ni,�; stated in Schedule A, sustained or incurred by the insured by reason of: 1 a, ,no'1.0 1. Title to the estate or interest described in Schedule A being vested other than as stated therein . 2. Any defect in or lien or encumbrance on the title; • ;; ::;.1 3. Unmarketability of the title; d , ,,- 44. . Lack of a right of access to and from the land; ;. ` 5. The invalidityor unenforceabilityof the lien of the insured mortgage u on the title; .% � P � -�� 6. The priorityof mortgage;Yill any lien or encumbrance over the lien of the insured mort a e; ��--r.:, te 7. Lack of priority of the lien of the insured mortgage over any statutory lien for services, labor or material: c w, ♦" (a) arisingfromF"�7iK``' an improvement or work related to the land which is contracted for or commenced prior to Date �� ? tied of Policy; or ; ; 4:' (b) arising from an improvement or work related to the land which is contracted for or commenced subsequent xi,; .= to Date of Policy and which is financed in whole or in part by proceeds of the indebtedness secured by the insured mortgage which at Date of Policy the insured has advanced or is obligated to advance; 8. Any assessments for street improvements under construction or completed at Date of Policy which now have4 gained or hereafter may gain priority over the insured mortgage; or • , :_ et 9. The invalidity or unenforceability of any assignment of the insured mortgage, provided the assignment is shown in Schedule A, or the failure of the assignment shown in Schedule A to vest title to the insured mortgage in the ` ; named insured assignee free and clear of all liens. ; The Company will also paythe costs, attorneys'fees and expenses incurred in defense of the title or the lien of the insured � P Y P ram=-ti 4::\,aAi mortgage, as insured, but only to the extent provided in the Conditions and Stipulations.ge �,.,. tar At' OP Vley tate First American Title Insurance Company 4 g BY PRESIDENT V ) ATTEST 444, SECRETARY / x 7 .i"9`'� �•NY N� •,,@.YM .{ \Yf �i—.4' P.5� 7 '.�:� -; F'ty iii tvt y t{'�'fS2r*V4h 5/i47'' '7jp+ tt 7 ` 4 I ;�� 'aJy,,, 47Ci�t`VQ 4 J� Z s� ♦ 1 �.� .�tS�yi��vt„4.s��J.�.� y �s ! b i ,,�� 'C,.,�. , ; a \ , tzR ig-±.�1r41� ' .#% R �+ liii 4t4,'K" dF$p�? { l , , ' '.'.'Au't? j14/`+r far: 'is /ght 0, ',p:Ap s 4:,;6 � �. , r �R:l a . ° r i t:.p i ,.jn 11;.Ys fN\+i k ,. �. �� \,i ,A.N_,ns P.. 1��q,'k ix '�i .� -_ ..�'''..s'�'•'K7%<'�r\''fit.w�-' -t \"' ,e�:,iv-E�s_-_.a '"+..:v �.:s `' a"` .l'N'' w+.. a+r'crx.,.. F`.c i • SCHEDULE A POLICY NO. 849156-C2 AMOUNT OF INSURANCE: S7,335,000.00 PREMIUM: S12,043.00 DATE OF POLICY: SEPTEMBER 21, 2001 AT 10:56AM 1. NAME OF INSURED: CON-WAY TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION 2. THE ESTATE OR INTEREST IN THE LAND WHICH IS COVERED BY THIS POLICY IS: FEE SIMPLE ESTATE 3. TITLE TO THE ESTATE OR INTEREST IN THE LAND IS VESTED IN: THE NAMED INSURED 4. THE LAND REFERRED TO IN THIS POLICY IS DESCRIBED ON SCHEDULE A-4 ATTACHED. SCHEDULE B POLICY NO. 849156-C2 THIS POLICY DOES NOT INSURE AGAINST LOSS OR DAMAGE (AND THE COMPANY WILL NOT PAY COSTS, ATTORNEYS' FEES OR EXPENSES) WHICH ARISE BY REASON OF: 1. TAXES AND ASSESSMENTS WHICH ARE NOT SHOWN AS EXISTING LIENS BY THE RECORDS OF ANY TAXING AUTHORITY THAT LEVIES TAXES OR ASSESSMENTS ON REAL PROPERTY OR BY THE PUBLIC RECORD. 2. (A) UNPATENTED MINING CLAIMS; (B) RESERVATIONS OR EXCEPTIONS IN PATENTS OR IN ACTS AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE THEREOF; (C) WATER RIGHTS, CLAIMS OR TITLE TO WATER; WHETHER OR NOT THE MATTERS EXCEPTED UNDER (A), (B) OR (C) ARE SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS; (D) INDIAN TRIBAL CODES OR REGULATIONS, INDIAN TREATY OR ABORIGINAL RIGHTS, INCLUDING EASEMENTS OR EQUITABLE SERVITUDES. 3. ANY SERVICE, INSTALLATION, CONNECTION, MAINTENANCE, CONSTRUCTION, TAP OR REIMBURSEMENT CHARGE/COSTS FOR SEWER, WATER, GARBAGE OR ELECTRICITY. 4. GENERAL TAXES. THE FIRST HALF BECOMES DELINQUENT AFTER APRIL 30TH. THE SECOND HALF BECOMES DELINQUENT AFTER OCTOBER 31ST. YEAR: 2001 AMOUNT BILLED: $43,351.01 AMOUNT PAID: $21,675.51 AMOUNT DUE: $21,675.50, PLUS INTEREST AND PENALTY, IF DELINQUENT TAX ACCOUNT NO.: 125380-0050-04 ASSESSED VALUE OF LAND: $1,093,100.00 ASSESSED VALUE OF IMPROVEMENT: $2,498,600.00 (AS TO LOT 5) 5. GENERAL TAXES. THE FIRST HALF BECOMES DELINQUENT AFTER APRIL 30TH. THE SECOND HALF BECOMES DELINQUENT AFTER OCTOBER 31ST. YEAR: 2001 AMOUNT BILLED: $13,906.86 AMOUNT PAID: $ 6,953.43 AMOUNT DUE: $ 6,953.43, PLUS INTEREST AND PENALTY, IF DELINQUENT TAX ACCOUNT NO.: 125380-0080-08 ASSESSED VALUE OF LAND: $870,400.00 ASSESSED VALUE OF IMPROVEMENT: $277,000.00 (AS TO LOT 8) 6. AN UNRECORDED LEASEHOLD INTEREST AD DISCLOSED BY AFFIDAVIT OF RENT DATED SEPTEMBER 19, 2001: A RUAN LEASING COMPANY SCHEDULE B - CONT. POLICY NO. 849156-C2 7. EASEMENT, INCLUDING TERMS AND PROVISIONS CONTAINED THEREIN: RECORDED: MAY 21, 1975 RECORDING NO.: 7505210388 IN FAVOR OF: CITY OF RENTON FOR: UNDERGROUND WATER LINE AFFECTS: ALONG NORTHERLY LINE OF LOT 8 8. RESTRICTIONS, CONDITIONS, DEDICATIONS, NOTES, EASEMENTS AND PROVISIONS, IF ANY, CONTAINED AND/OR DELINEATED ON THE FACE OF THE PLAT RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 7809250902. PARTIAL WAIVER OF PLAT RESTRICTIONS: RECORDED: NOVEMBER 28, 1994 RECORDING NO.: 9411281295 9. EASEMENT, INCLUDING TERMS AND PROVISIONS CONTAINED THEREIN: RECORDED: MARCH 13, 1979 RECORDING NO.: 7903130592 FOR: RAILROAD TRACKS AFFECTS: THE WEST 20 FEET 10. EASEMENT, INCLUDING TERMS AND PROVISIONS CONTAINED THEREIN: RECORDED: AUGUST 8, 1979 RECORDING NO.: 7908080702 IN,FAVOR OF: PUGET SOUND POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY, A • WASHINGTON CORPORATION FOR: ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION AND/OR DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AFFECTS: THE WEST 20 FEET OF THE SOUTH 300 FEET 11. EASEMENT, INCLUDING TERMS AND PROVISIONS CONTAINED THEREIN: RECORDED: DECEMBER 29, 1980 RECORDING NO.: 8012290366 IN FAVOR OF: CITY OF RENTON FOR: PUBLIC UTILITIES AFFECTS: THE WEST 15 FEET OF LOTS 5 AND 8 SCHEDULE B - CONT. POLICY NO. 849156-C2 12. EASEMENT, INCLUDING TERMS AND PROVISIONS CONTAINED THEREIN: RECORDED: JANUARY 12, 1981 RECORDING NO.: 8101120506 IN FAVOR OF: CITY OF RENTON FOR: WALK AND LANDSCAPE AFFECTS: THE NORTHERLY 10 FEET OF LOT 8 13. WATER LINES AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: BETWEEN: CITY OF RENTON AND: STUART D. KNOPP AND DOROTHY L. CASTRO, A PARTNERSHIP KNOWN AS KNOPP-CASTRO-ORILLA RECORDED: MARCH 9, 1981 RECORDING NO.: 8103090447 END OF SCHEDULE B SCHEDULE A-4 POLICY NO. 849156-C2 THE LAND REFERRED TO IN THIS POLICY IS SITUATED IN THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: LOTS 5 AND 8 IN BLOCK 1 OF BURLINGTON NORTHERN ORILLA INDUSTRIAL PARK RENTON DIVISION NO. 1, ACCORDING TO PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 108 OF PLATS AT PAGE(S) 12 AND 13, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. J-10/92 i , 4 EASEMENT The Grantor, GLACIER PARK COMPANY, a Minnesota corporation, hereinafter . i called.'called.Q4 Company, for and in consideration of the agreements herein contained, i SS `u ! does hereby grant to the CITY OF RENTON, hereinafter called City, an easement i C N to lay down, construct, reconstruct and permanently maintain an underground to In CD water line through, under and along the following described premises situated in King County, State of Washington. A strip of land twenty (20) feet wide being ten (10) feet on each side of the following described centerline: Commencing at a point on the east line of the Northwest Quarter i.• of Section 30, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.H., King County, Washington, which point bears•South 1°S8'23" West 2102.78 feet from the northwest cornerfthereof,fand North •p: 89°34'54" West, a 'distance of'�•35:77''feet,`the'.true point of � i; ,:� beginning; thence North 89°34'53" West, a distance'of 1308.04; r '4' thence North 1°35'12" East, a distance of 782 feet. ��"�`�• • Together with a slope and construction easement u .to,60 feet ':r•• wide being 30 feet on each'side of said easement'ccenter'line,`- t(2c ,�-, reasonably necessary for original''construction'of said water line. r This easement is made subject to and upon the following express conditions: I The Company, for itself and its successors and assigns,' reserves all rights t r+.• ,--. . to usetthe property hereinbefore-described foreanY''an'd allpiirposes xhitsoever """"�f' not inconsistent with the easement herebyincluding,.but : granted, includin but not limited '' to, the+�right to construct, maintain,;repair, renew, reconstruct, replace and +Et••- operate.'railway tracks and future;tracks, communication;signal and electric i ..„ , .'T, , . . power lines, utilities including'sewer lines, water'lines,'gas lines, streets, sidewalks, roadways and other types of facilities on said property when deemed necessary or expedient to the Grantor. Rights reserved shall be so exercised as not to damage or interfere with the water line as above defined. This ease- ment Jr: subject to all existing interests of third parties in said property of any kind or nature whatsoever and any and all extensions or renewals thereof. f II I i. This instrument does not grant or convey unto the City any right or title to the surface of the soil along the route of said permanent easement except for the purpose of laying down, inspecting, restoring and replacing the water line. JIII el The City agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Grantor from any and all loss, cost, damage or expense arising out of work performed by the Grantee or its contractor in constructing and maintaining said" underground water line regard- less of whether such loss, cost, damage or expense arises out of damage to, or destruction of the property of the Company or any person, firm or corporation whatsoever, or out of claims for personal injuries or death. 4 i 4 - . . i - - ) '•' IV In the event that this easement shall at any time cease to be used for an underground water line, or shall by operation of law or otherwise become vacated or abandoned, the easement herein granted shall immediately cease and terminate without notice or other proceedings on the part of the Company and the c0 City, its successors or assigns, shall reconvey immediately said property to (.7.) the Company. ... : _t5 ..,(4t...; -.% , .,, • :. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this agreement in 1 CQ S duplicate this c,?;,T day of Qet, :€ . 1975. . 1 1 t-- .,:•,-- --,44:24,: 4: GLACIER PARK COMPANY . - , 1 ': • . *.npr,. --- .,,...,•.., ..-...,.;;.=.4.:-...:., , •• iritc4^Lt;ii i, .. , . ...,..., - • tt . •4,A.., a: 4.4 Byt v 4.di ., • — ' 'A.!-,'Y,;.;„.• . ' . 4.1'.ifq:.'Y' • .,•.., , .. : -..,:. ,. ' r -',..." • ••• .,.. .1.,‘..r.^',...4A A.,.. : ,,: ' •g: ,! i f r•..r 1,,,,l/kg-inei i'1115"'llik04ff*".4t:• ", •4r.t•• 1 ' . • • : ",.( .•51.,:,q,;;9•.4.• .;' •''. 4.• • . i: , • - . ..... '.,Ak. •'.r.:1.4 lo Attest: ---:....,, ..;,, 6:7":.:,. .,'Ar--:.,.' :,.'11747.,..;.i.,1.::,1A,...a..." •.. , Z2111.1, !lib!: .. • .;4''''21":':1'.. • :,, . . . .... NP • ' i ...!•,,'.. • •..1 - , :..:,..„,44: „titof..„:;.:,• ,...., ,, t-..,.., .. " ".„.; '- , ',,,,,o, ,A,.,. .,4, ..,„, ;I; ''':'' ' ' ' •..vitn!,,.. 17'''''' "...;.,' " ' •\'',,,',?!--....,:r"...,,,. ?..",•4,, :z, .'• .1.•:,:"V''r • , • -r •,,•-4.-:' '' , ., , ' ,•0 44.,,I.,P ;;;',.; .. , , -.... ....„,,, .:: . ,F'i..4 .%• -.-,`., . . • • ' ..: ' :,;-,i,,f4-...:--ith,..:, '•.:,, .. . • --.?"" .4.-; '•-•'-' ' ' ,,:: 4-'44•8te 1.`", .:?''',;'-',,,&.`.. .,:, . ; .:•. ! .. ...,..•••..0,,,••••••,:,..1., . .•-•-; , .0 Alteit.,4 .. S'.•, ,:i:-!.,??,., ••-• -44 f s'.',73,4 , . .,..,? is `i ..."',', .4.,,,......• • • '• ''. '(1.'17.,,•. .„ 1. _*: .:,`Aq•''''' '* *i; I.%-V1'': "!1,,,i'i.r:,, ..;- , ..,.,-.4.4ft,....„ ( ...Approved as.,to xorm r.n s •, ! . • . ''..s...1... ' ••••' • ' ?•,'i, I '',?,,I:''';''.' —-4ft /..:/i„ :,..' .'‘ 4.,,,.,1:1,1,.. "'.'''''' ,i..?,-,• , -, \ day of -7 ,..- , 1975. ., . . .. : ) ... ';1‘';'.' : " . • , •• ,.• ' ' ,r 3 ,',*: * ' . - - . ., ... ck• Pg4:--''',-*'••:. , , ..,:stf.. • , • .,Y., , • . .. ,- 'Ot.,,,_. ' . ' ' • "". ' .S:f.- •-Z.L.:1•14..C'4 .•••••• r •"74. .: ' - , ,.', ' .`;6.' .4,:'••,•,..'4•.;•".'r4f7 . '''" ;.7,,',;;,,',':•*4,:,,,,,:i'i: ; ..,.:i . . .,,, . , : . , , ;.,,s;::;;Ai ''f•''I'''C. **0 '*: • '.:triPST.irt;PFAIMIT,Trlar • ' ).,4 'Ali*.ilf",.,.';'••:i7•!..:.: i!''..!,.,:4: :?i..:•4•i44 .. ' '''' .•:..?- 4 ,&\;•;.;-.,,.,:,;•' .1,."•:V:''''?;..... ......:: , ;;:.:,...,:4„;71. 4...i.,:%e.m7.;,,::,Ill'!,4‘... -,,.; ..... . ". .,:41;,. 41.14..., ::',!'.:•; ,Jil;''fri,:4,A,:.):,,,:":,,-,•,,c. .: 4:*,t,.,7,1 1;....e.‘'',;.* , 121,F.V•ii:ii.FOUlitY'.41f PUlli ;30 ..'.,:i' ,!t'.,';•."';',i5.,:;..*...1:!•,:f'"1'' . • •"',1 -,,- ,•:-:. '.':': :.: • '.. • .^:,., 3: • . 'rt.' • •*trj.,.i'," k..,,,.1. .(!',T,,*:'''""'''.' ' . 7.* :*Tt*?', .;• •yr*:5;:g;;:i,:••::,,,.''*. -*.' ••',.:,, '::.:".•j:1 **i'°•,.':; ' * On this '.;;?::;?, ,--: deY of (//.06.i.€21 , 1975, before me personally appeared , 'c: 'I C. KENADY and F.A.DEMING , ..,••• to me known to be'''':VICE,',...- President and ASSISTANT Secretary of Glacier Park r'rJAY • Ccmpany, the corporation that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and i acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said Glacier Park Company, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that they were authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said Glacier Park Company. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official • seal the day and year last above written. •AAAANW til M. SMITH 1r/it. '1/11 Xi.rnoi) -- ..t NOTARY PUHA-MINNESCTA Notary Pt:b:riecsiidninagndatfor the Si ta/t}e of -2- COUNTY / My COmm trj4fes Gat.18.an ,,7 . .... livvvvwwwww~vvvvvvvvvvonmlve 1 • B&n'L/TVGTOIV NORTHERN 108-13 OR/L L/A INDUSTRIAL PARK OF RENTON 0/VISION I Section 30, Twp. 23 N., R. 5 E. W.M. Section 3/, Twp. 23 N., R. 5 E. W.M. N,4 Car Sr.301.1.5 60 Match Line - S 1r•J/'09-f _ /3/641 ,(see be/Ow) e Y S.W. 34Ih STREET I . _-sur/7 Nr/,N . ei 3v a QOGa �R•.. u/sJ S.W. 27/h STREET nR m'ai R 2 :� RP, "t tf�'94./''l7" r i16.0 TTFF 11309 IT 173 Of .1- 1J4.A9 \ (.AS.JY Z 2 C•tK.09 •J,-.�. I I 5/•JO'Ot r:'.'"''�'.'tlm � N:Kfd " t41.1770 42 471.re .J,p3 S rJ0'O7-r ,b- �,.44•a mm II e1.m I';•ors B 9 / • IJ N AJ.m N!9°Al• L' M ,YI/r4/Sr./w4 R•4I,s.J7 _ 5 N qm r I /O.m r I I �M'9y'6Jj Q.�I(N ;�.160.M--d JA/.6V --. '-a.7I^lUSI--- a I NF 0vnr • r.J/4.p.. J'�� L.994 63 " a Y R.1005.Sr / t > i ftii HO.O 0. N'i'3r'u�r rv/osz• =RW /16oii• /O 3 N/WSro9r mm � • �! ��y :`. /6oue ' e ravrf0 t�v.o ��III s4e.0 i C V�+ �" I 8 S I7rJ/-Of f 1 6JJ.A7 11 S V 3,oD f JH.II F•� "I • _ I II 1/4 N L'4 SEC 30 N S.00•3%E+ v : dwi4e ' w >Z Vas bo w��e.av wrm'a3" 1�r I4Q7• I ...4 p3+i oJ" --� II SE I/4 SW L44 SEEC.3n i �y/� HS IS I I V .0 _I W- �16° 7liliftLI N/6w�.sY N Ser•si 47 r J I W p R•3J.m •' I 6•/a1°a'K" 4J! * C 400,414. 3 �.f�IIm <5.J7'.1f u- L./31.31 S.6tYQ�m' L.37.I1J _ �2 4V L.�.39 1 (5 q `^• ti x •R • •.•L•f17.N , t W V h .�I S 20 ln1,E•.r. 0 J N I- cc J -N p•1/'09-r_ Q 14S1sA N /7I.0176 8 0 ; / 4d •ti0 J� -2 -660.6V- ��r_ 37y.A'- J I �' 1 I '��' .� I:- A L•334.1,6 V �" L Y ]C4 S.v. •II 0 ti __m '- b. - 'L-D-J w./9�Q7 t6r41 tiR w Q N I I bm • --N N•1/'OY r__ -_N1�J r'�qJy r.� -N 1 pi Qi N/' E ^--bs.4.9-----MSg3- 1743%0Yr- _NI hew ..--. ...: I--�1KJ.m- - N 6!1•arar-r Sala 1 J/9.6J f 'ow ,1 , /�6 f�eem /Or 7J it •v II 519.- -- l` d ..I .. f'.f3 m" N. as o r N„m.m.e- s/.+ • ``� L.Art.3r• I b a.Go tea.. 1[40'NiMs.1.1 i (( Oa R f\ f4. 1 N ra'u f D.6/.4,14✓r* Z. ',SAWN Q b. R` NE I/4 SW ,I4 SEC.30 ; / ;..d'''4lg- I I s 1rJo'a. �� K I L•K OS - A./I•. [SCSI I 343.s7 `�Z • 6 .; 6.6 - q i ,j R / V s.W. 4/f STR ifEET 3r0,f14* t 2 $l t/d II N/.1t/4 1J1.00 ; I 4e/1.31 I w I 74 C l L.1Cp t t /r LOT d- / b \ •RI . SEC. 31 ;5 R.ae NI ^ K% e Z. 4 N • ' ' >(� ' �mm L.SSA, 1n'-- .� I �. -a' R.TICK?eift y :\1E !/4 NW L4 SEC. 3: L.116.4.9 t • ��373.LV r63.CG L v 1•I7/.I1 .• .KS.m lrz is 0.31'r/J6'.. :1 S.W. 34 IA STREET Y © ''13799 v Match Line " '7^Jr 09 r 1P6.43 --?- 3 ; (see above) I •_ i�(I.r4 Ip R•J3.00 \6 J1. / /.\ /.\ t ✓4i✓f7 JwM rlw..IF 1.41 .-A.d4r'lz- ��l .4� Govt.VM/.s .y 6. L. 4•t4 ''y.' N rsMsti. 4'• lJlO , 5Nar5I.P- 6J7.49r 1` ► \.Jd N 7"r S Nr033I-f �.A/.M s.W. 43rd STREET Gorl Le,I..LC N ',lone • //n• NE IA'Nr//1 Sr,J/ R; . LAMBERT CR/O NOR TN ZONE SCALE /"_200. A land seer ping and rlility lnumMl is here reserved /3'in r/drh odjoin/ng East Volley highway ord S.46' 43,d S/reel and U./n ...dMA adjoining o//other slreels snort, hereon. ._ �-' 1 I OU_ MAP COMPANy, ANC, r. i BI�NRL/NGTON NORTHERN io OR/LL/A INDUSTR/AL PARK 8 OF RENTON _ D/V/S/ON I Section 30, Twp. 23 N, R 5 E. WM Section 3/, Twp. 23 N., R. 5 E. W.M. DESCRIPTION APPROVALS ALL THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEST QUARTER OF SECTION 30, T 23 N, R 5 E, M.M., AND OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER DEFT. OF PUBLIC WORKS OF THE SDUTNEST QUARTER Of SAID SECTION 30, AND OF THE SOUTHEAST /yA QUARTER OF THE SOUTH.EST QUARTER OF SAID SECTIONEYAMIMED AND APPROVED THIS I y DAY OF.. _ 30,131,OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST197b. TCMCHIP NO RANEE, LYING WESTERLY NO/OR NOR1HCSTERLY OF EAST / pyI' VALLECDON 8 OLLET SASHAY AND TYING NORTHERLY OF S.M. 43RD STREET; (FORNERLY DIRECiOR� C WORKS ASS. 1Y ST.) /y TOGETHER WITH ALL THAT PORTION OF GOVERNOR LOT R(AKA S W 1/4 S W 1/4), SAID SECTION 30 NO OF GOVEBHBT LOT 1(AAA N W 1/4 TRAFFIC ENGINEER N W 1/4), SAID SECTION 31, LYING NORTHERLY OF S.M. 43RD STREET HEARING EXAMINER AND LYING EASTERLY OF A LINE DESCRIBED AS POLLOMS: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT IFE WI THHIN PLAT OF COMMENCING AT TIE SOUTHEAST CORNER EE SAID GOVERNOR LOT 1; IS OU.Y MPpO.Tj BY THE CITY OF U4 AY `•��'. THENCE N 89°03' 54"W ALONG THE SOUTI LINE THEpEoF 54.04 FEET OF My.j. ,C.- 1 8. �I NK EYAMINER 7FE DAY TO THE THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE N 1"ON. 45"EP WITH OE FAST LINE OFSAID GOVERNOR LOT 1 A DISTANCE OF OFNFU • 1120.00 MEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT Of NG INER . 2000 FOOT RADILG; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE A DISTANCE ING D OF 356.12 FEET TRRJOI A COITRAL ANGLE OF 10° 12' 07"TO THE CITY COUNCIL BEGINNING OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT OF 2000 PoOT RADIUS; THENCE ALONG • THE AK OF SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF 31U.82 FEET TO COA A CENTRAL EXAMINED AND APPROVED BY THE MOM CITY OOIMCIL THIS I1M DAY OF ANGLE OF 9°08' 01"TO A POINT OF TANGENCY ON THE FAST LINE OF A AFORESAID GOVERMENT T LOT R; BC E AWAY'E N 2"08' 51"E ALONG SAID I ,1978• • . EAST LINEN TO THE TERMINUS COINER OF LINE. GOVERNOR LOT R ^ NO THE NORTHERLY TERMINUS OF THIS LINE. ° Uli/7�7/ DEDICATION NA ' ' � N' CITY CLERK,,f),rr.m AOR ALL MEN BY THESE PRESETS THAT WE, TE UNDERSIGNED,%HERS IN FEE SIMPLE OF THE INC HEREBY PUTTED, HEREBY DECLARE THIS MT AND DEDICATE f7EPT. OF ASSESSMENTS TO DC PUBLIC FOREVER,ALL ROADSOM) 9O O WAYS WAN HEREON WITH THE RIGHT TO HAKE ALL RECESS** CUTS AND FILLS, AND THE RIGHT EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS /�DAY OF Sc'A,T 978.TO(MATINEE 10 DRAIN SAID ROADS YAK OVER AND ACROSS ANY LOT OR LOTS, WHEREAFTER MIGHT THE A RAIWRAL COURSE, IN THE ORIGINAL REASON MILE '/R=C � ^ . Q a GRADING OF 114E ANDS No OWN N WAYS 9 HEREON. . EJ1!/ N u KING CIXATY A.SGFSSC DEPUTY ASSESSOR PD LOMIK THE ORIGINAL REASONABLE GRADING OF DE ROA06 AND RAYS SHOW HERE" ND DRAINAGE RATERS ON ANY LOT OR LOTS SHALL RE DIVERTED CM NO =FROM THEIR NATURAL COURSE SO AS TO DISC/MIKE UPON ANY PUBLIC RIGHTS Of RAY OR TO HAMPER PROPER DRAINAGE. ANY ENCLOSING OF DRAINAGE NITERS IN QA.IUTS OR DRAINS CR RE-TOUTING THEREOF ACROSS ANT LOT, AS MAY BE UDERTAICEM BY OR FOR THE ORER OF AT LOT, BALL BE DONE BY COMPTROLLERGS CERTIFICATE I AND AT THE 00436E OF SUCH CANER. IN WITNESS HEREOF E HAVE SET OUR IYMOS NO SEALS. I CERTIFY MAT THERE ARE NO DELINQUE)T SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AND ALL GLAQER PARK COMPANY SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS ON THE PROPERTY HEREIN CONTAINED DEDICATED Ly, AS STREETS OR FOR OTHER PUBLIC USE ARE PAID IN FUR. .�J / f THIS�/� aY OF 2 .-t 1978. A•CRETARY ACKNOWLEDGMENT F DIRECTOR, CITY OF RENTON SHWA Of NAlmrsota County of Roms.y I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ALL PROPERTY TAXES ARE MID, THAT THERE ARE FIT'- THIS IS TO CERTIFY TAT ON THISN DAY OFAPR/L. A.D., 1978, BEFORE DELIHQLFNT SPECIAL ASSESPUITS CERTIFIED TO THIS OFFICE FORACCLEGT1OR ME, THE UNDERSIGNED, A NOTARY PUBLIC, PERSONALLY APPEARED J. C. KENADT, AND THAT ALL SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS CERTIFIED TO THIS OFFICE FOR COLLECTION VICE PRESIDENT,ND J. C. ASTON, SECRETARY,E GLACIER PARK ON ANY CF THE PROPERTY HEREIN CONTAINED, DEDICATED AS STICETS,:AL{EYS, OD., 10 ME TOWN TD E THE CORPORATION THAT E)EQTED THE WITHIN CR FOR OTHER PUBLIC USE,ARE PAID IN ROLL. t . , DEDICATION, ND AOOQBIDGED THE SAIO INsTRl*BNT TO E 1IE FREE N) WL.UMMY ACT MO 0®OF SAID CORPO ATIOI FOR TIE USES NO PURPOSES THIS 11/4 aT OF SVPYA,M BIN 1978,TER IO NENTIO®ND ON OATH STATED TAT THEY WERE AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE THE SAID INSTRUMENT AND THAT THE SEAL AFFIXED IS THE CORPORATE H SEAL.OF SAID CORPORATION. {Tf RALD A. RDS'A✓Q vis r KING COUNTY QYPTROLLER DEPUTY KCNG COAT WITNESS MY NANO AND OFFICIAL SEAL THE cox AND YEAR FIRST ABOVE 00, 11ER WRITTEN. / 1e_ _ A PUBLIC LAND SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE NOTARY BLIC IN ND FOR LAND OF MMINESOTA I HEREBY CERTIFY TAT THIS PLAT OF /.51,.I:w6..4'v/L,.n GL,71:r..,F-4.,/R,.1./t; RESIDING AT ST. PAUL IS BASED UPON AN ACTUAL SURVEY AD SU01YIS1CN OF SECTIONS JO NMC TOHNSHIP MY OONI551ON EXPIRES APAL 22, 1983 . K'J RNGE .f L. M.M. TAT THE COURSES NO DISTNIC_5 ARE SHORAN CORRECTLY THEREON; THAT THE NGH1ETS WILL BE SET AO THE LOT RESTRICTIONS COMERS STAKED CORRECTLY ON THE GROUND; NO THAT I HAVE FULLY COMPLIED WITH PROVISIONS OF THE PLATTING REGUATIONS. NO TRCT A OR PORTION OF A TRACT IN THIS PLAT SHALL DE DIVIDED AND i SOLD OR RESOLD OR CA ERDHIP C EO AM 0R TRANSFERRED MERE BY THE REQJ REDI PM THE USECAMER9RP OF ANY TION Cf DISTRICTHIS PLAT SHALL RE IN WHICH LOCATED. TAN THE AREA CERTIFICATE J. NEl3RA IC CERTIFICATE Ply 7589 GLACIER PARK COMPANY HEREBY RESERVES UNTO ITSELF, ITS SUCCESSORS NO ASSIGNS, THE RIGHT TO CONSTRUCT, MAINTAIN, USE, OPERATE, RELOCATE, RECONSTRUCT ND RENEW SUCH TRACKAGE AND OTHER FACILITIES OF GLACIER PARK CCNPONY, ITS RKY'PSSORS NO ASSIGNS,AS IT MAY AT AT TIME AND RECORDING CERTIFICATE 7809250902 FROG TINE TO TIME DESIRE WITHIN THE SAID PREMISES, AND THE RIGHTS HEREIN RESERVED SMALL E AND REMAIN SUPERIORTO 71E RIGHTS OF ANY AND FILED FOR RECORD AT THE REQUEST OF THE CITY OF RNNYION THIS 25 DAY or ALL OTHERS IN SAID LANDS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO UTILITY SEPTEMBER 1978, AT 10 MINUTES PAST 2:00 PM. COPMIIES NO/CR THEIR DESIGNEES, WHO MAY HEREAFTER OCCUPY SAID PREMISES NO RECORDED IN VOLU£108 OF PATS, PAGES 12 &13 RECORDS OF CR WIt0H MAY EXTEND ITS CO THEIR FACILITIES, OVER, USER, ACROSS CUR KING CDIN1Y, W15H1MCTON THOUGH THE SHE. IF SUCH FACILITIES Of OTHERS OCCUPYING SAID PREMISES OIVI SIGN OF RECORDS AND ELECTIONS REQUIRE ENCASE/ER CR ANY OTHER PROTECTION BY REASON OF THE EXISTENCE AND OPERATION OF NNY SUCH TRACKAGE CR OTHER FACILITIES OF GLACIER /'')��j� PARK CCM/NTH TOY, ITS aKTIONSR5 AND GL CIE10PA, SUCH PRANY, TION SUCCLLESSORS OE S PROVIDED �LiSJ.Cl.I ,e2/ PLALSLAvrT TO SPECIFICATIONS OF GLACIER PARK COMPANY, ITS Sl1CCEs5CRs AND CLINT G. ELSOM AS51G6, AND THE MARK WILL BE DOPE BY SAID ANY AND ALL OTHERS AT ITS MANAGER RINTENOQNT OF RECORDS OR THEIR SOLE COST, LIABILITY NO DPECSE. 0 a --- (, 11. WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: $_ I RIDDELL,WILLIAMS,BULLI'fT&WALKINSHAW SUITE 4400,1001 FOURTH AVENUE PLAZA h. SEATTLE,WA 98154 ct -1 d m i 1 PARTIAL WAIVER OF PLAT RESTRICTIONS g r, _ o 1 1 t This Partial Waiver of Plat Restrictions("Waiver")is made by Glacier Park V Liquidating Company,a Minnesota Corporation formerly known as Glacier Park Company i3 I ("Glacier Park"),and is dated November 3, 1994, • I C) I. Property. The following described real property("Property"): N Lots 5 and 8,Block I,Burlington Northern Orillia rl CI) Lots Park Renton Division No.1,according to the CI? Plat thereof recorded in Volume 108 of Plats,Pages 12 • �� and 13,records of King County,Washington. • d' • 11 •• C� al Situate in thc County of King,State of Washington, . �/ " ` r—t is part of the plat of Burlington Northern Orillia Industrial Park of Renton,Division 1,filed in t, • Vol. 108 of Plats,Pages 12-13,and recorded under King County Department of Records& Elections Number 7809250902("Plat"). ✓P.. 1,,1' ,1 2. Plat Restrictions. The Plat includes,in the restrictions section,a reservation in 1:f -'' favor of Glacier Park("Reservation"). A copy of the Reservation is attached to this Waiver as • Exhibit A. O 3. Partial Waiver ofReservation. Glacier Park hereby forever waives and )i, relinquishes all of its rights under the Reservation with respect to the Property except for the • West 20 feet of the Property. Except as specifically waived herein,all of Glacier Park's rights ' under the Reservation and the Plat remain unchanged and in full force and effect. i :1 0q 1 . 1 , Flat ra nca d c1 R0¢3211 d FIRST Ah1ERICAN TITLE • "' ` FOURTH&B ANCHARD BLDG. t'o'p�1 SEATTLE,WA B812t 1 r 9121,1011011 1$ 0 I 1 4. Reliance. All present and future owners of any interest in the Property may rely upon this Waiver. GLACIER PARK LIQUIDATING COMPANY BY Gene Wingo,Vice Presi ent 1 I i • STATE OF TEXAS ) r, • ) SS. 1 COUNTY OF TARRANT ) , I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Gene Wingo is the person who ', appeared before me,and said person acknowledged that he signed this instrument,on oath stated that he was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the Vice ':• President of Glacier Park Liquidating Company to be the free and voluntary act of such party F,"7. for the uses and purposes stated therein. '-,i III al Dated Xe.t,.c,,. /6 .l4Qy 1 r C‘2 Name: ,4, ,� f c (f , f1 q.Eli • • NOTARY PUBLIC,State of Texas ,,\ My Commission expires g-(q-q 7 I 0• •1 A.- o , I 0 • I � „. ry„ 0 11/ GLACIER PARK COWANNY HEREBY RESERVES UNTO ITSELF, ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, TFE RIGHT TO C}ISTRL1CT, MAINTAIN, USE, CRATE, RELOCATE, RECONSTRUCT MD RENEW SUCH TRACKAGE AND OTHER FACILITIES OF GLACIER PARK COMPANY, ITS SUCCESSORS NC ASSIGNS, AS IT MAY AT Ni! TIME AND FROM TIME TO TIME DESIRE WITHIN THE SAID PREMISES, MD THE RIGHTS it HEREIN RESERVED SWILL DE AND REMAIN SUPERIOR TD T1E RUNTS Of ANY AND ALL OTMCRS IN SAID LADS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO UTILITY r COMPANIES AND/OR THEIR DESIGNEES, WO MAY 1[RL'AFTER OCCUPY SAID PREMISES OR kHICH MAY EXTEAD ITS OR THEIR FACILITIES, OVER, RIDER, ACROSS CR THROUGH THE SAME. IF SUCH FACILITIES Of OTHERS OCCUPYING SAID PREMISES REQUIRE ENCASEMENT OR ANY OTHER PROTECTION OY REASON OF T}HE EXISTENCE AND RR OPERIT1CN OF ANY SUCH TAG OR OTHER FACILITIES CP GLACIER i PAP.X COMPANY, ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, SUCH PROTECTION SHALL BE PROVIDED PURSUANT TO SPECIFICATIONS Of GLACIER PARK COMPANY, ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, AND THE NARK WIU. D[ C M BY SAID ANY AND ALL OTHERS AT ITS CR TEAR SOLE COST, LIADILITY AND EXPENSE. • � 7 �j. ll: q.= f/5 • .l , •4 ":'• D; GO !. H • • �... Jai QyITCLAIM DEED 1 "f4R� 1;:1979 ' 4.1" ( C) . \ F05; ..l i Jai ' The Grantor, GLACIER PARK COMPANY, a Minnesota corporation, for and in consideration of TEN DOLLARS ($10.00) and other valuable consideration, receipt of • which is hereby acknowledged, conveys and quitclaims to STUART D. KNOPP and - ° , CV DOROTHY L. CASTRO, as their respective separate estates and as partners, all of its right, title and interest in and to the following described real estate situated O in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington, including any after C7 acquired title: Cl p All of Lots 5 and 8, Block 1, Burlington Northern Orillia Industrial Park of Renton, Division I, according to plat recorded under No. 7809250902 in King County, Washington. RESERVING, however, unto said Grantor, its successors and assigns, a railroad easement including the right, privilege and easement to construct, maintain, repair, renew, use, operate over, replace or remove railroad tracks, drainage facilities and appurtenances thereto in, along, over, upon and across cross the west 20 P feet of the premises herein conveyed, to have and to hold said easement for so long as the same is used or required for railroad purposes and until said Grantor, its successors or assigns shall remove all such facilities from the said premises with the intent to abandon said easement. As a further consideration for the premises herein conveyed, Grantees hereby agree to construct on said premises herein conveyed within two (2) years from the date of this conveyance, a building containing not less than 57,000 square feet of floor area to be used as a distribution warehouse in the business of • Grantees. Grantees also hereby agree to construct or arrange for the construction of a railroad spur track to serve said building for the receipt and shipment of freight by railroad cars. In the event Grantees have not constructed said building • and spur track within the said two (2) year period, Grantor shall have the right, for a period of one (1) year from and after the expiration of said two (2) year period, to repurchase said premises herein conveyed for the same consideration paid by Grantees, without further compensation for any improvements located thereon, upon giving written notice to Grantees of Grantor's intent to repurchase said premises herein conveyed. Upon the service of such notice upon Grantees and the tender of • the said consideration to Grantees by Grantor, Grantees shall reconvey said premises herein conveyed to the Grantor by good and sufficient warranty deed, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances, except for those enumerated in this conveyance and • Grantees shall give to Grantor a title insurance policy evidencing such good title. This conveyance is further subject to the following: Regulatory control by the State Supervisor of Flood Control Zone No. 2 inclusive within the boundaries hereof and other property lying within a flood basin - RCW 86.16.010. All easements, encumbrances and restrictions of record. • IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said corporation has caused this instrument to be executed by its proper officers and its corporate seal to be hereunto affixed this ate; 26th day of February , 1979. . GLACIER PARK COMPANY y ByA / ��P,2 • Vice President A j • 1 -.• v� Attest: • / L-��.�` -&L� •. 6 4_,, Secretary .: ..' 'tee" i e 1 i.. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. ! P County of Ramsey ) 1 On this 26th day of February , 1979, before me N ersonall appeared J. C. Kenady Y PP and G. F. Steinhibel to me CD known to be Vice President and Assistant Secretary of the corporation that • Cexecuted the within and foregoing instrument and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said co ration for the uses and ' purposes therein mentioned and on oath stated that they were authorized to execute the said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corpo- • ".`-' ration. S .. :ar e1 #'i IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official i i seal the day and year first above written.pausimusimimussamisamsamarummL4A � . 6 ;"-,1 J.w.MAYER ' • • t,A/� NOTARY PUBLIC•MINNESOTA 1J1 `�� (��•• t• , RAMSEY COUPlTY Notary c 1Jl an r the State of ' ` My Comaisabo Expires Noy.17,1005 Minnesota, residin St. Paul. -'' y x S.. .w..,4.. .i/r,t,i.• •1. SC".._'.it•..f.n :t.t -E,ti1F. . ,..'. .,.. 1- __ • Lt-7- C4E1,31 ; 11•1 F -;fit: di-e .=.Z :« mil... r . sit1= : 41 4v 1 1 i i tf i i 1 i f I.1 i 1 I I 1 ". -'t ' - --- '. amp , r . — _ .•_-r.-_ i 1. _,.•_i •'f+w+- _ .. . , LDS - ---�i IMI=MMIS. MIIIIIM•011MIMINIONNIMIO, ?r Rcs I i. a •V••,i • P11GET EASEMENT FOR UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC SYSTEM POPPER •• •• STUART D. KNOPP a,., mci/L,ckj I ("Grantor"herein),grants,conveys and warrants to PUGEf SOUND POWER&LIGHT COMPANY.a Washington cor-• .-. poration("Grantee"herein),for the purposes hereinafter set forth a perpetual easement under.across and over the fol- • _ ' • ' lowing described reel property(the"Property"herein)_ King County,Washington. Lots 5 and 8, Block 1, Burlington Northern Orillia i . Industrial Park of Renton, Division No. 1, according to the plat • • N recorded in Volume 108 of Plats, pages 12-13, in King County, • t • o Washington; r situate in Section 30, Township 23 North, Range e. East, W.M. • 0 i f • t Except as may be otherwise set forth herein Grantee's rights shall be exercised upon that portion of the Property(the"Right- !. i . . ... • of Way"herein)described as follows: A Right-of-Way 7 feet in width having 3.5 feet of such width on each side of a center- I f line described as follows: / . The centerline of Grantee's facilities as constructed or to be constructed upon the above described property, lying t H within the west 20 feet of the south 300 feet of said property. i L Purpose.Grantee shall have the right to construct,operate.maintain,repair,replace and enlarge an underground electric transmission and/or distribution system upon and under the Right-of-Way together with all necessary or convenient ap- purtenances therefor.which may Include but are not limited to the following:underground conduits,cables,communication lines;vaults,manholes,switches,and transformers;and semi-buried or ground mounted facilities.Following the Initial con- struction of its facilities,Grantee may from time to time construct such additional facilities as it may require. , 2 Access.Grantee shall have the right of access to the Right-of-Way over and across the Property to enable Grantee to exer- ) t cise its rights hereunder,provided,that Grantee shall compensate Grantor for any damage to the Property caused by the exer- , rise of said right of access --. 7.Obstruction;Landscaping,Grantee may from time to time remove trees,bushes,or other obstructions within the Right- of•Way and may level and grade the Right-of-Way to the extent reasonably necessary to carry out the purposes set forth in • paragraph 1 hereof,provided that following any such work.Grantee shall,to the extent reasonably practicable,restore the _ Right-of-Way to the condition It was Immediately prior to such work.Following the Installation of Grantee's underground ! . facilities,Grantor may undertake any ordina.y Improvements to the landscaping of the Right-of-Way.p.ovided that no trees or • other plants shall be placed thereon which would be unreasonably expensive or impractical for Grantee to remove and • - • restore. 1 4.Grantor's Use ofRight-of-Way.Grantor reserves the right to use the Right-of-Way foe any purpose not inconsistent with the rights herein granted,provided:that Grantor shall not construct or maintain any building or other structure on the Right- of-Way which would interfere with the exercise of the rights herein granted;that no digging,tunneling or other form at con- • struction activity shall be done on the Property which would disturb the compacticn or unearth Grantee's facilities on the Right-of-Way,or endanger the lateral support to said facilities;and that no blasting shall be done within 15 feet of the Right-of- . Way. ' • i S.fndananity.By accepting and recording the easement.Grantee agrees to indemnify and hold harmless Grantor from any I and all claims for injuries and/or damages suffered by any person which maybe caused by the Grantee's exercise of the rights herein granted;provided that Grantee shall act be responsible to Grantor for any injuries and/or damages to any person ` I caused by acts or omissions of Grantor. ES.Abandonment.The rights herein granted shall continue until such time as Grantee ceases to use the Right-of-Way for a - period of five(5)successive years,in which event this easement shall terminate and all rights hereunder shall revert to Gran- ; tor,provided that no abandonment shall be deemed to have occurred by reason of Grantee's failure to initially install its • i ' facilities on the Right-of-Way within any period of time from the date hereof. .•• . ( t 7.Successors and Assign.The rights and obligations of the parties shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon their ( respective successors and esrigns. 44/KJ VI: FYCISF TAX f:r.' .:1';' J , 1t 234201 --'-'Co. i' 1 � 4.-1114 _,- .,�,.,.,, 235/ -- ii , f __ _,CcF J, - .Y. ;K:i — .. .. •at,.•_.'�`.'ems k'I, '�rT t r.: rc .9 s � ' • DATED thisday of• • • • GRA • 'v�^!'tv Stua D. no ! • ii;• • ! 1 4(jl o 41V i • .i..no t ,t,S,i1i tJ!•1-.rt27a t` • • STATE OF WASHINGTON ) • o ss OUNTy OF King ) • On this day Personally appeared before me Stuart D. 'to me known to be the Individual_described In and who executed the wi • • '—�—signed the same w his thtn and foregoing Instrument and e r --free and voluntary ad end deed for the uses and that `, t. GIVEN under my hand and official seal this ox eft purposes therein mentioned. —� day of > Notary Public fort tate of residing at / • STATE OF WASHINGTON ) } COUNTY OF SS 1 . .i. . 1 On this day personally appeared before me • to me known to be the individual_described In signed the same asand who executed the within and foregoing free and voluntary ad and deed for the uses instrument end acknowledged that GIVEN under my hand and official seal this _ Purposes therein mentioned, .a day of • • • Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, p C.' residing at . - STATE OF WASHINGTON ) • COUNTY OF SS S ) o• On this day personally appeared before me ar Q to me known to be the individual_described in and who executed the within signed the same asthin and foregoing instrument ein men .... -- free and voluntary act and deed for the usest and edged that J and purposes therein mentioned GIVEN under my hand and official seal this :. day of 19 t�1• at ti 0• CD Public in and for the State of Washi coresiding et ngton, p j t� f STATE OF WASHINGTON I i i ,, , et SS COUNTY OF CORPORATE ACKNOWLEDGMENT p On this day of f { • ..1 .to__,before me,the undersigned. • T to me known to be the and gn personally appeared t` and o� and acknowledged respectively,of r edged the said instrument to he the free and voluntary ad and deed of saidreorporation.fn thal or the uses andu s therein • mentioned,and on oath slated that foregoing itutrument, . ♦. C seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. �---authorized to execute the said instrument that the • Witness my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above written. 1 7 FILED FOR RECORD AT REQUEST ��N`ott'ary Public in and for the.St.Ae of Washington, 'M1 • PUGET POWER Cltikding at •7t..�,. R`AL ..TE DiV,S1ON --- — — — • =� _ PUGET POWER BLDG. SEL�EVUE, WAS�'!NCTON 98009 ); I 4D 74n ---N . '--- _ _ .— •. - • -s. ' .0 - .. "sue„��-+.� ...'.:. -� - -• 9' r; f. • ' r^. ..t••aQ•r:':>..•.d•r_-ii.r. .: + •.n, .._... -•" • w I UTILITIES fl EASEMENT THIS INSTRUMENT, made this day of October 19 80 ; '� r ', by and betwe _ and • b s. Stuart D. Knopp and Dorothy L. Castro, a and ; ' , ` Partnership known as Knopp-Castro-0ri111c and_ • .O and • � ,•,.• 1iw i;', hereinafter called "Grantor(s)", and the CIT' OF RENTON, a Municipal Corporation of King .1%k. - l County, Washington, hereinafter called "Grantee". �.� N • .: WITNESSETH: _ '' :', QO That said Grantor(s), for and in consideration of the sum of $ 1.00 • ..c.r. '• ;,, One Dollar paid by Grantee, and other valuable consideration, do by „ ^" `! i these presents, grant, bargain, sell, convey, and warrant unto the said Grantee, its i *' ,, ,;_• �'1'• ...'•."-•• successors and assigns, an easement for public utilities (Including water and sewer) with • . n;:1 1,�, . necessary appurtenances over, through, across and upon the following described property • yr .• ` In King County, Washington, more particularly described as follows: ' )•': 1,.. The West 15 feet of Lots 5 and 8, Block 1. Burlington Northern •P _ Orillia Industrial Park of Renton as recorded in Volume 108 of sY , 1r' I Plats, page 13, Records of King County, Washington. its t•..r; lF • ' •fit.: / " ..• •,� ,`-^':^''JlP.W r(•.. ra F'' . 1•.: K• :ti s i 8i/12/29 *0366 D . RECC• F 6.00 CASHSL •$•4 rF,.'Di i - I1 • i • iEr _� i i S1' lil- .� _.,y ; UEMI-1 +,tib . '•`. -_ , ail • •.; • • � ;;iiI j •. • . _ r. +^ , .`-- `�•'t • ` --mow• ' +! -4- _ • I - ' • c• . Y•...r.. \• Y A Said heretofore mentioned grantee. its successors .r assigns, shall hive • the right, without prior notice or proceeding at law, at such times as may be • necessary to cater upon said above described property for the purpose of construct- ing, maintaining, repairing. altering or reconstructing said utilities, or making any connections therewith. without incurring any legal obligations or liability • therefore, provided. that such construction, malntatnin , repairing, altering or • An. reconstruction of said utilities shall be accomplished in such a manner that the ( • i t private improvements existing in the rights)-of-way shall not be disturbed or 'r • , damaged, they will be replaced in as good a condition A; they were immediately ' 1, • i' � before the property was entered upon by the Grantee. ti• , v°i N The Grantor shall fully use and enjoy thg,aforedescribed premises. including • the right to retain the right to use the surface of said right-of-way if such use N does not interfere with installation and maintenance of the utilities. However, • i to the grantor shal•• not erect buildings or structures over, under or across the • oo right-of-way during the existence of such utilities. This easement, shall be a covenant running with the land and shall be binding r. x T on the Grantor, his successors)heirs and assigns. Grantors covenant that they • { ,. . r,,; are the 1X11ful owners of-the a!lb000ve properties and that they have a good and lawful — right to a ecute t is ie t. i and +a' f .:'" : X , *4-' �J and j :r.,,` ! "�y,1,,:; and i � a I and _ a 'J ,: 9 . t-rt.i'. ''; i:1 41'r • '.' • iI 1 i. • • CORPORATE FORM: i +pf t • 'tR' n.. i.i •r • c.:: 4'f: STATE OF WASHINGTm SS ::J 1 •% "I1": : COUNTY OF KING :.; On this 10th day of NOVEMBER. . 19g�before me. the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of . duly conmissioned and sworn `• personally appeared STUART D. KNOPP 4o0X ,}i)CtiliKXpAQki(1CX :•,•`.. to me known to be the PARTNER AfltC • of KNoPP-CASTRn-npU.;7 T the corporation that executed the fure- going instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be t:,e free and v,iuntary . '. ;.' •J'r ! act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and l on oath stated that he authorized to execute the said in .trument X> tsix • r OW l{rn<xXRix cIctktexixcomi IoseRk>i#hc"OAc;t: rfek itAiSl9cx •. ..• WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year in t•.i•, ' certificate above written. i 2. • .i•y i • i4., ' : i ot�tary Public in ai�for Tie ..:,,t of '.i' • 'I. -• WASHIN gTnA , re5: I'm .It. .SEATTLE : ... t R( }i$i •.i�., t ` ni JEi2 2 b 1 i -pj•. • • le' • r • • • tC:-1 , /* ' ' • • ..• - . •1 • • l I .. a.; v •p v:: i CORPORATE FORM: •'a l ir5tae r 4 STATE OF California i 11 ti COUNTY OF Los Angeles SS ' f L, On this 6th day of November . 19 80 before me. the undersigned. , k t,- 4 S?#= 1 f�••, a Notary Public In and for the State of California . dulycommissioned and sworn .``•' ' „%1:1 (NJ personally appeared Dorothy L. Castro aodc• , , i. . . ,, -- �� to are known to be the Partner ysadc ,xxeayexx�lxwi + . co • of Knopp-Castro-Orillia i *i the corporation that executed Lhc forr.- v r 6• going instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary • !, . act and deed of said corporation. for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, ani "1*w„ 1 • :,. on oath stated that she authorized to execute the said in:trunient anyix> •, • +`• �`jl %hrxszewixobetwedodexxbba;xmaaytexaxRx�tlad of said corporation. ' x ` • n' 'r �'iits, T WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year in this •.t?,•' y r'i''..I I certificate above written. j y1 +f M �• / .. k Ri't i 3t '.7'., r • OFFICIAL SFall. 9 ° �' ii t ' • iA: MaYiRWeuCMuCIAIN {_ i,� 1 S NOTARY UFORMIN 1,},{/,,,' ` 1/l/ b S Nil /�-'�//�-(/�_. // va, , ail ti• i f ' �.-:'I los"ncuacamn otar Pub1icin a y ox �. •- w .tabu MI tt 19N al f t e S td to o f { t ' - California residing at Los Angee ',}r •` i.ri y ill N.Mips Neal tw Ay.W.CA 90060 --- •1..41 Y ¶. ti " b •f UEr2-s b • • • •• (It' • ' ' • - '-' ' • ' 1 ••. "• • .-- — - ,, •. • .• '1'.\... '' / i .. , ; kt. �ii.nl / I �Z t1 1 ar• :. • •}�'. •• , (Ul 1 •'" 5 WALK AND LANDSCAPE EASEMENT '' F.T. RECNI.) s t.L'c I^NS • -- if*t':i •,.._.. \' TNIS INSTRUMENT, made this 2nd day of JANUARY, 19 81 ; •' ' 1. by and between STUART D. KNOPP and DOROTHY L. CASTRO • • `� A PARTNEF.SHIP, KNOWN AS KNOPP/CASTRO/ , ' �/ 1 O� and c i 1 (�i and • � 1 O hereinafter called "Grantor(s)", and the CITY OF RENTON, a Municipal Corporation fir.- 1 — of King County, Washington, hereinafter called "Grantee." g1;r11i12 krl�.0:, E 1 WITNESSETH: F"=CC• F 5.00 t{:v.: ,AThat said Grantor(s), for and In consideration of the sum of $ 1.00 't ' paid by Grantee, and other valuable consideration, does by these presents, gr- It,1 i.n, bargain, sell, convey, and warrant unto the said Grantee, its successors and ff£ 1 tr assigns, an easement for walks over, through, across and upon the following •7'' �I ::`!-'' �' described property in King County, Washington, more particularly described as follows: ,t'„ ' -1 The Northerly 10 feet of Lot 8 Block 1 of Burlington Northern Orillia di Industrial Park of Renton as recorded in Volume 108 page 13 of Plats, ; ,.- .. .4 t.,f ) Records of King County, Washington. • e Said Walk and Landscaping shall be maintained in perpetuity by the Grantor. ' •S , • )>E`l�;i' a This easement shall be a covenant rul:nin with the land and shall be bind- •• '.,>!)}.1� , ing on the Grantor, his successors, hei s, and assigns. Grantor covenants �. ` ;:1)0l;4k that they are tfe lawful owners of th above properties and that,the Ujlpy NOT REQUIRED . i,1 ;I a good and lawfu�} right to e ecute t s agreement. ° t 'ISE TAX// King CO.Reaerds Division . - • ', rati i'll':, {j?(•(- p�f � �, ) and 3y (/' 1.c' ,Deputy ,;� • •:,ft aP•t � and _ • �!+�Jtj�1: and • ` �•.iri� and , 1.,•11 ' '' i .. �•`1 .' XEIRDORIATH X111X PARTNERSHIP FORM: , .I STATE OF CALIFORNIA :(1,}1t 4. 1 SS ,r.(;E • COUNTY OFLOS ANGELES On this 2ND day of,TANUARY, 19 HI before me, the undersigned, a , 4 r Notary Public in and for the State of CALIIOPNIA , duly commissioned • '•.:Or'1`'.'- and sworn personally appeared DOROTHY L. CAS-Raid ---- :c9T and • a., to me known to be the • i 'i..�." • xpts,pt'mt5,KXot6CXXXXXXX:fXXXXXXXXXXXY.XXXiCX:(XX1�iXn''Ro t}mI ecexRQIIftidXXXXX _. • „ . -' tH�c e�igotalansty'mem and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and r� °t , voluntary act and teed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein {ti.i• '� ) mentioned, and on oath stated that SHE authorized to execute the said , instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation, 011 :`, WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year in this certificate above written. ci . +• . , '� ____ 77 k �• y� ,- MI'PICIAL SEAL ��•4'• • et •'i. ,..,...,n IMC fIAIN '/' \�_�f = • gy{pp"� (( .'Int.:•CALIFORNIA �ti•r^ Er;es;7'.t;:ruNn Notar Pub is 'n'and for the Late o' 1. ~p :; • �`•? Cali, o nia ,residing In Los Angeles F1 _ ! ' �.-l;•+� . 411 N.Mlsslcn moat.1°s•'�.f^'::•f,:�5C950 l)i A' ,�/ . / ` • • a - - a. ' •;• -g W-520 '!.. r T • �?'iS�' aT �" ` y g 11 49 AH : ► • ",AGREEMENT AND CONVEYANCE ;, ' '•1iY IHr_D.'1':',1:rir OF , ,x..na ? .`, ,At.. a. ' i ` a RECORDS 8 ELEC NS i y, ,;,s n ik.�t _ —.: i `r y PRE'';' UTI LIT i ES SYSTEMS •� )^,� KING COUNI Aral to v.•••- ', tt �J + -` 1'IIIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this Q n day of /1,ARCN 19&! r ' -. 1 by and between the CITY 11F RI.N'I'ON, a municipal corporation •acting as a Non- • Charter Code City, under the laws and statutues of the State off.Washington. .•:Y1 l.• , Stuart D ,Kropp and c•liP• • r- r-hcreinafter referred to as "City", and ' n oroth L Castro A Par n rahl , n as K pQp-Castro-0[illia ,• t �' �+ i' ••, .fereAditCcr reTerredt €o asp ueveloper Y O CT, W I T N E S S II T II: " 0 WHEREAS "The Developer" is desirous of installing,certainwater.lines and - ,12 r 1 ,pappurtenances thereto at, near, or within the hereinbolow described property t ,..;••:.-.'-,,-1 and to connect same to the City's Utility System so that such improvements will - r.• constitute an integral part thereof; any WHEREAS no other property owner: or users are presently available to share ;,%� . in the cost and expense o,f;�con$truction of such improvements and the parties 44 s; !• hereto having in mind the%provi§ions•and termsof,Chapter:261 'of.the 1959 N,1` _y Sessions Laws, generally'referred to as a "Municipal Water and Sewer Facili- • 3F� . ties Act, r. (RCW 35.91 101 et seq)"; and 1 �v , tV4Iii,f WHEREAS "The Developer'',:}s willing to pay all the.costs and expenses for f• .1ti • the installation of said,improvements; ? r • . NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED AND COVENANTED BY AND BETWEEN THE AFORESAID PARTIES AS FOLLOWS: Are IA I, 1. The "Developer" hereby acknowledges and covenants that the/i:r the owners "� �, ' of the following described property, to-wit: • 6' ;i Lots 5 & 8, Block'.1:`,Burlington Northern Orillia Industrial Park of Renton. f i ? Division I. as,)•ec d�,Vn Volume 108 of Plats, Page 13, Records of King wa vw.; r'tatvCarr:A`#w:,..:-:.. +r. ,..,,... rr•.. ,a,:;_,..��:F��..,N.w�+Yut' County. Nashington. 83,03„00 M0447 C S 11 tt RECD F 5.00 ' :: -' �: ' ti ' CRSHSL w�v+5.00 ' � Y br , and the "Developer" hereby agrees and covenants to cause to have installed the • ;Il following described improvements, to-wit: tF A 10" D.I. Watermain and appurtenances along the westerly edge of the 4, aforementioned property. It �; P �j'�� YYY = and such installation to be made in full compliance with all applicable codes •j,, 1,.• and regulations of the City of Renton. The "Developer" further covenants and 1Y : warrants that all expenses and claims in connection with the construction and tel. I• • installation of the aforesaid improvements, whether for labor or materials or rr P.* ' ii Ilk is both have been or will be paid in full, all at the "Developer's" expense, /s., tj :' and the "Developer" covenants and agrees to hold the City of Renton harmless .IL. C�1► ..' o any liability in connection therewith. .-4tr' • HL[O for Reocrd at Request n mrii L' i,,I• FILED FOR THE REQUEST OF • 11•.i. r ' Office of the City Clerk 401 4? Renton Municipal Bldg. _ '�, . . 200 Mill Ave. S. '� i47, Renton, WA 98055 • - i Any ; , • • - y. s _ .'+' r.• . 2, The "Developer" further certiites that the tot.). estimated cost of said construction as hereinabove specified will he in the sum of S - 4l,8)8_68 ._-_____.,_.___. Based on said total amount of cost, ilte--cosh:-per '- < .w►rr.-•1:►nt•%r the cost ter front IineaI foot (eVr4 8431trr-rhr-hvt••►l=.rhtz- -rt) ' of said improvement shall he employed to determine the pro rata reimbursement to the "Developer" by any owner of real estate, who did not contribute to the original rust of such improvement , and who subsequently wishes lu tap into ur • 1 k unto ur use said facilities, which tap or hookup shall include counec- - tions to laterals or ')ranches connecting thereto, all subject to the laws and 1 ordinances of the City of Renton and the provisions of this Agreement. It is dtereby further agreed that in the event the total actual cost of the afore- gescribed imy,ruccmeut shalt 1>• diifertnt from that set forth hereinabove, when this Agreement will be duly amended to set forth the total actual cost ' T hereof. 3. lt is hereby found and determine. that the construction and installation h' °� said aforedescribed improvement is in the public interest and in furtherance ,"` 'y l!', of public health and sanitation. 1. The "Developer" hereby agrees and covenants to convey, transfer and assign unto City all right, interest and title in and to said improvements and all appurtenances and accessories thereto, free from any claim and en- cumbrance of any party whomsoever; City agrees to accept and maintain said improvement as part of its present Utilities Systems upon approval thereof by _ r the City Engineer and after inspection of said construction. The "Developer" • • further agrees and covenants to execute and tt. deliver unto the City any and j;•l. a all documents including Quit Claim Deeds and Bills of Sales that may he necessaryto fullyvest title in the Cityand to effectuate . reasonably 'I this conveyance and transfer. The "Developer" further agrees and covenants to pay unto the City such service or other charges as may be imposed by the ri�,at 'ti1'44 Ordinance of the City of Renton from time to time applicable to like users i1ri of the same class. 'i'Z^r ` JS. City reserves the right, without affecting the validity or terms of' t' 1 this Agreement to make or cause to be made extensions to or additions of 1,1 ` . the above improvement and to allow service connections to be made to said ' .i, extensions or additions, without liability on the part of the City. ' = b. No person, firm or corporation shall be granted .a permit or be ¢+ qw • ''• •777T'''��•• 'i authorized to tap into, hookup unto or use any such facilities or exten- t j ' lions thereof,during the period of___ 10 ___years from date hereof, without ri, first paying unto the City, in addition to a.ty and all other costs, fees t { ' and charges made ur assessed fur each tap, hookup or use, or for the water; .� , main facilities constructed in cunuecIiun therewith, the amount require.) C 1Ai,;' 'i by the provisions of this contract. All amounts so received by the City' . ;� . t shall be paid out by it unto 'I'Dc "Uceelupor" under the terms of this ^.i 1•a Al•I' greement within sixty Iun1 days after reccil,t thereof. Furthernwre, in case any tap, hookup ur •:unnection ismade into any such contracted - I 1 _ i . 1 I -1 , - f . . M ' — ------- - ._ .. _ 3 .r r..i _ ' facility, without such payment having been first made, the legislative , ' •r''s i body of the City may cause to have removed such unauthorized tap, hookup or r to , :, ' i` connection, and all connecting (title or pipe) or related accessories located _ in the facility of right-of-way, and dispose of such unauthorized material ,, ; - •�, .2 so removed, without any liability on the part of the City whatever. It is r` . c further agreed and covenanted that upon expiration of the term of this • . gig ri Agreement, towit: 10 years from date hereof, City shall be under ' ;i ,` no further obligation to collect or cake any further sums unto the "Developer': , .,, 1 r-1. 'a ti The decision of the City Engineer or his authorized representative in ir; �, +c. ' determining or computingthe amount due from any benefited owner who wishes +f' -i<;'i^ aas to hookup to such improvement, shall be final and conclusive in all re- y4 '+il:e , CD . O spects. r_ without affectin the validit or terms i'..�' % ' 6. The CITY reserves the right, 6 Y rt:— oD of this AGREEMENT, to make or cause to be made extensions to or additions ) d .y' of the above said water mains and to allow ,service connections to be made •li'tx "b �' Fto said extensions or;.addit3 s, without liability on the part of CITY. 4/ qua • ^ 7. It is further agreed and understood that�the aforedescribed improve- ' :i{ �Ls{; ments to be undertaken and paid for by Developer +�wit r;� +i: have been or are about to be connected with 'the Utilities Systems of the „} *, . '`ii a` t City, and upon such connectiot nd:accoptanee'by the City through its •s :.' b im, i! legislative body, said extension and/or improvement shall be and become a ° �t '.,� part of the municipal utilities systems. • 8. Phis agreement shall be placed for record with the King County t + 1.,v,4' Auditor's Office immediately upon execution thereof and all costs of record x i !' :. p y'*` , K ing shall be the responsibilityof the "Developer". • • i' ‘ ' • ,• r DAY OF l'1, 4 C_H .19�� g•sj, c •. AT]:D Tlil� h 1:17ir ,�-- -- ---___...._•-_... t t 4l" CITY OF RFNTON, a.Municipal Corporation DEVELOP ..,, / :,..., ,'} tr , n r, ny: ° co.. + .4. 'I• ,i Mayor • S*4 ' 1 i1 {r ,, ., By: 4.I.•rt, ,f,' 0 7l)tet0/ By: "-'1e7'l' ili } fy: IF [City Clerk ,.; 1 �'/•i• h,s.• STATE OF WASHINGTON)) ss ^t' ,K0.1 • COUNTY OF KING ) I,,, ..yr i # . lip 1 On this day personally appeared before me STUART D- KNOPP and DOROTHY CASTRO,J• known to be President and Secretary respectively, of the munistxgai yl' i corporation that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged ', ' q 4♦� said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation •'...,- i: i`• 1: • for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that they t' ,'- ',"'S. .) were authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed is the • . corporate seal of said corporation. >>�.,t ' :'IVIiN under my hand and offici�] seal this 7=� day of ��i,ri'el 10" t` •.a . i..—. am. T , „r to••`•trl^ Notary Public rand for tote of ., --•: t "r l'i 1: Washington, residing at '.'/' e 9 t. • i1 7 « ' r. , ,I I hereby certify that Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor and Delores A. Mead, City Clerk, or the ( - ! !.•';.. municipal corporation, City of Renlon, did appear before me and sign the above document LF•. ; Wit ' March 5, 1981 i ` .L< �7 _.... ate....[�-7.-' G"„IZJ • AA �,/•3�?; Notary Public in and for the State Lof '•'ashington at King County • • •• t.,.• -- -- — . . . • ' — — � . '. • s� • DEvEi.;, - . - . , '� �l C,iv O -!-:L.i`!:ON 11 SEC11 !JL ) )EVELOPMENTPL4.NNING I NTON ctn Aral J� DEC 3 1 2001 . ,� ;FiP:. OkP,tFitt,;�t T , R'"�""�' �y`�"� -----�• MEMORANDUM RECEIVED DATE: /-2 "3/ -d TO: Construction Services, Fire tion, Plan Review, EDNSP, Project Planner FROM: Neil Watts, Development Services Division Director SUBJECT: New Preliminary Application: - tdctii 7/lGld 7 �brkt sf t� LOCATION: �0 Sw 3�f� ,� PREAPP NO. /2'6 Of- /3/1 A meeting with the applicant has been scheduled for /O. C) 414 , Thursday, 741,7 w /� , in one of the 6th floor conference rooms (new City Hall). If this. eeting is scheduled at 10:00 AM, the MEETING MUST BE CONCLUDED PRIOR TO 11:00 AM to allow time to prepare for the 11:00 AM meeting. Please review the attached project plans prior to the scheduled meeting with the applicant. You will not need to do a thorough "permit level" review at this time. Note only major issues that must be resolved prior to formal land use and/or building permit application submittal. Please submit your written comments to 'aJ Y1 at least two (2)days before the meeting. Thank you. Q CA�h1/l?Pvl S• g ., mt,/ C,9 si t/ w,"i/l �EJ u%`c/, Ode e, AA‘al• Ptafti a�� prey-75 QAe fr i/' l D e,-t c�c. l , Qto,t- -''rot,/4 I e t A ita ic..4 r-o n .5". 414 i AO c/.4e / 7;4/is . is 3/ a/ / uJpi H:\Division.s\Develop.ser\Dev&Plan.ing\Template\Preapp2 Revised 9/00 CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works MEMORANDUM DATE: January 10, 2002 TO: Pre-Application File No. 01-134 FROM: Jason E.Jordan, Associate Planner, x7219 SUBJECT: Con-Way Trucking Terminal General: We have completed a preliminary review of the pre-application for the above-referenced development proposal. The following comments on development and permitting issues are based on the pre-application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant and the codes in effect on the date of review. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision-makers (e.g., Hearing Examiner, Zoning Administrator, Board of Adjustment, Board of Public Works, and City Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by City staff or made by the applicant. The applicant is encouraged to review all applicable sections of the Renton Municipal Code. The Development Regulations are available for purchase for$55.00, plus tax,from the Finance Division on the first floor of City Hall. Project Proposal: The subject site is located at 400 SW 34th Street. The proposal is to demolish the existing dock building and partial demolition of the raised dock. From there, a new platform and building would be erected over the existing dock area. New concrete dock aprons would also be installed along with a new fuel-dispensing island. Zoning: The subject site is designated Heavy Industrial (IH) on the City's Zoning Map. The facility is considered to be a"truck terminal with associated warehousing" use, which is an outright permitted use in the IH zone. Development Standards: The IH zone development standards and the parking regulations would apply only to new building construction and uses. The development standards are addressed below and would be reviewed in conjunction with any new construction proposed: Building Restrictions—The IH zone does not contain provisions restricting building height or lot coverage. Building Setbacks—A minimum setback of 20 feet is required from arterial right-of-ways and 15 feet is required from all other street designations. Rear or side yard setback requirements are not applicable to the project. Landscaping—The IH zone requires all portions of the site not covered by buildings, structures, required parking, access, circulation or service areas to be maintained as permeable areas improved with native, drought-resistant vegetative cover. A minimum landscape width of 20 feet is required along arterial streets and a minimum width of 15 feet is required along all other street designations. An additional 2% of the site must be landscaped in accordance with the Green River Valley Plan. This landscaping should not be dispersed throughout the site, but should be aggregated in one portion of the property. Lastly, parking areas that exceed 10,000 square feet are required to provide a minimum of 5% percent of the total parking area as landscaping, which is intended to break up the baron appearance of the parking area. All landscape areas must be a minimum of 5 feet in width and is required to contain underground irrigation systems. Screening—All outdoor(vehicle) storage, garbage, refuse compactor or dumpster areas must be screened by a fence, landscaping, or combination of both in order to achieve visual screening. Con-Way Trucking Terminal Pre-Application Meeting,January 10,2002 Page 2 Parking—The parking regulations require a specific number of off-street parking stalls based on the amount of square footage dedicated to certain uses. Therefore,the following ratios would be required with the proposed development: • Office: a minimum of 3 per each 1,000 gross square feet of floor area to a maximum of 4.5 per 1,000 gross square feet of floor area. • Warehouses and Storage Buildings: 1 for each 1,500 square feet of gross floor area. It should be noted that gross floor area is defined as all areas excluding rest rooms, stairs, corridors, lobbies and mechanical rooms. Therefore, the proposal would require 17 stalls for the terminaVwarehouse portion of the development, while the office portion (not including the 2nd story) would require between 24 to 36 stalls for a grand total of 41 to 53 stalls required. Access and Loading areas—The site is accessed from SW 34th Street, which is not proposed to change as part of this development. With regard to loading areas, City code requires a minimum clear area for dock high doors to be 100 feet. Based on the plans submitted for this pre-application conference,this requirement can be achieved on the east side of the proposed structure; however, the west side of the proposed structure only provides 92 feet of clear area. Therefore, a modification to this requirement would be required as part of the site plan review process. The following criteria will need to be addresses and submitted with the site plan review submittal: 1. Will meet the objectives and safety, function, appearance, environmental protection and maintainability intended by the Code requirements, based upon sound engineering judgment; and, 2. Will not be injurious to other property(s) in the vicinity; and, 3. Conform to the intent and purpose of the Code; and, 4. Can be shown to be justified and required for the use and situation intended; and 5. Will not create adverse impacts to other property(ies) in the vicinity. At this time, staff is generally in support of such a modification if properly addressed through the criteria established by code. Environmental Review/Sensitive Areas: While no critical areas were located on the site based on the City of Renton's Critical Areas maps, environmental review will be required because the structure is proposed to be over 4,000 square feet in size. Upon formal project submittal, a more exhaustive site investigation will be conducted. Signage: Only one freestanding business sign (pole, monument/ground, projecting or roof) is permitted per street frontage for each individual parcel. Each sign shall not exceed an area greater than one and one-half square feet for each lineal foot of property frontage that is occupied by the business. In no case shall the sign exceed a total of 300 square feet(150 square feet per face if a two face sign). In addition to the permitted freestanding sign, wall signs with a copy area not exceeding 20%of the facade to which it is applied are also permitted. Permit Requirements: The proposal would require Environmental (SEPA) Review and Administrative Site Plan Approval. The review process would not require a public hearing and would be completed in an estimated time frame of 6 to 8 weeks once a complete application is accepted. However, this timeframe is contingent upon the filing of any appeals, which would delay the project. The application fee would be $1,500.00, plus $0.34 per mailing label required for notification to all property owners within 300 feet of the project site. In addition to the required land use permits, separate construction, building, and sign permits would be required. The review of these permits may occur concurrently with the review of the land use permits, but can not be issued prior to the completion of the required appeal periods. Please contact Jan Conklin, Development Services Representative, at (425) 430-7276 for any building permit submittal questions. In the event that you have additional comments or questions regarding the pre-application meeting, please feel free to contact me at(425) 430-7219. cc: Jennifer Henning Pre01-134(truck terminal in 111 zone SEPA and site plan review).doc\ 3. Do above-ground tanks need to be also approved by Washington State Department of Ecology, Underground Tank Division? 4. Would second floor handicapped access be required if the second floor is permanently sealed off? /Vp 5. Confirm the storm drainage requirements around the new fuel island. 6. Would fossil filters be required to be installed at existing stormwater inlets? 7. If no structural modification is done to the existing office building,other than moving non-load bearing partitions,would structure need to be seismically upgraded or shown to meet certain force criteria? ,1/0 s f a N d *ro( re £e`-`' 8. Based on the UBC, appendix 29, the total required toilet count is 2 per sex. This i 4 e'AA is based on office(first floor only) of 8,100 sf @ 200 sf/per=40.5 person. Dock -4-'1+ '°"T of 26,000 sf @ 5,000 sf/per= 5.2 person, or 46 person total. Please confirm the �l't a " cre toilet requirement. I J J4 _ f}wt 9. Handicapped restroom facility is provided by a set of new single occupant restrooms. The existing restrooms may not meet current H/C standards. We are proposing the new restroom to serve as the accessible restrooms for the office and dock use. Is this acceptable? ye S 10. Stair#2 will exit through the new dock. Please confirm that this will be allowed. yes 11. Please confirm that door#122 is allowed for exiting, we intend to have this door unlocked during business hours. 000 c- 2 sko u lcA s w i r+' {-L .z. c( ir'c 67:)ti elbvi-cs-, r (flri oocved14.c' We appreciate your help in providing us preliminary information. Please call if you need anything else. b r c a c-on 1^4 a tiO4 L S roo u-c , Sincerely, • Kit . Wong Project Manager DEVELOPMENT PLANNING r', '11=RENTON DEC 31 2001 MEMORANDUM RECEIVED DEC 3 1 2001 DATE: "3/ - d( EL. AND 7RATEi;IC r TO: Construction Services, Fire Prevention, Plan Review, EDNSP, Project Planner FROM: Neil Watts, Development Services Division Director SUBJECT: New Preliminary Application: Cu'1' 7/itiet y LOCATION: 40o St() „VA Sfrel: PREAPP NO. / ' 6 Of- l A meeting with the applicant has been scheduled for /0:d0 }'1 , Thursday, /�- , in one of the 6� floor conference rooms (new City Hall). If thi-r eeting is scheduled at 10:00 AM, the MEETING MUST BE CONCLUDED PRIOR TO 11:00 AM to allow time to prepare for the 11:00 AM meeting. Please review the attached project plans prior to the scheduled meeting with the applicant. You will not need to do a thorough "permit level" review at this time. Note only major issues that must be resolved priorto formal land use and/or building permit application submittal. . Please submit your written comments to Tad at least two (2)days before the meeting. Thank you. i c)% is lei./c., ,Set her: �/ / fi r //' �%s dde4r-16,ta it. .ef.-/ix-f r Ate' ,t-yell` H:\Division.s\Develop.ser\Dev&Planing\Template\Preapp2 Revised 9/00 JAN-15-2002 11:19 -"TY OF RENTON 425 430 7300 P.01/02 TO K'ir M. INONE Fmff f u(.,C_ Q�1�9r CO LTiQANS'1/fT �M� �+�ca.C/T�/ OI' fbv'T J Phone* Phone* Fa Si t3 5— 78. 7 Fax*yzs.. 0 '7 e, CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: January 10, 2002 TO: Jason Jordon FROM: Paul Lumbert SUBJECT: Con-Way Trucking Terminal Preliminary Application Note on Preliminary Review Comments Contained In This Report: The following comments on development and permitting issues are based upon the pre-application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision makers (e.g., Hearing Examiner, Board of Adjustment, Board of Public Works and City Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on programmatic, site planning and other design changes made by the applicant. Sanitary Sewer: c , ()L- ;Di The site is served by existing sewer mains in the following streets: APR C S 1. 8" located in SW 29th Street 2. 8" located in SW 34" Street The proposed fuel island will require a drainage system to collect surface water from the concrete pad to an oil/water separator and connection to the sanitary sewer system. The system will require a shut-off valve between the oil/water separator and the sewer connection. The size of the oil/water separator will need to contain any fuel spilled on the surface or pad wash down. The concrete pad will require a roof or canopy cover. Con-way JAN-15-2002 11: 19 - TY OF RENTON 425 430 7300 P.02/02 January 15, 2002 Page 2 Water: The site is served by existing water mains as follows: 1. 12' located in SW 34" Street 2. 12" located in SW 29' Street 3. 10" in City held easement at west side of the site. 4. 12: in City held easement at east side of the site. Any new water main, fire hydrants or sprinkler systems must meet fire flow and current Fire Codes/Regulations per City of Renton Fire Department. Surface Water: The site is served by existing storm mains located in SW 34" Street and SW 29th Street. The project looks like it is not adding any new impervious surface to the site. Therefore, no additional drainage system improvements will be required. Street Improvements: The site has existing street improvements in place on the adjacent roadways (SW 34' Street and SW 29`" Street). If no new trips are added to the site then no traffic mitigation fees will be required. However, a traffic study will be required. General: Construction permit fees will be required for construction of water mains, sewer, storm drainage system and street improvements.. The cost of permits are as follows: The first $100,000 is at 5% of the cost of the construction, the second from $100,000 to $200,000 Is at 4% of the cost and the third all the amount over $200,000 is at 3% of the cost. Half of the fee must be paid upon application for building and off/on site utility and street Improvement construction review. The remainder shall be paid when the permits are issued. TOTAL P.02 _ITY OF RENTON 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Printed: 04-09-2002 Land Use Actions RECEIPT Permit#: LUA02-042 Payment Male: 04/09/2002 03:09 PM Receipt Number: R0201895 Total Payment: 1,506.80 Payee: TRANSYSTEMS CORPORATION Current Pay Went Made to the Following Items: Trans Account Code Description Amount 5010 000.345.81.00.0007 Environmental Review 500.00 5020 000.345.81.00.0017 Site Plan Approval 1, 000.00 5955 000.05.519.90.42.1 Postage 6.80 Payments rr ade for this receipt Trans Method Description Amount Payment Check 211571 1,506.80 Account Balances Trans Account Code Description Balance Due 3021 303.000.00.345.85 Park Mitigation Fee .00 5006 000.345.81.00.0002 Annexation Fees .00 5007 000.345.81.00.0003 Appeals/Waivers .00 5008 000.345.81.00.0004 Binding Site/Short Plat .00 5009 000.345.81.00.0006 Conditional Use Fees .00 5010 000.345.81.00.0007 Environmental Review .00 5011 000.345.81.00.0008 Prelim/Tentative Plat .00 5012 000.345.81.00.0009 Final Plat .00 5013 000.345.81.00.0010 PUD .00 5014 000.345.81.00.0011 Grading & Filling Fees .00 5015 000.345.81.00.0012 Lot Line Adjustment .00 5016 000.345.81.00.0013 Mobile Home Parks .00 5017 000.345.81.00.0014 Rezone .00 5018 000.345.81.00.0015 Routine Vegetation Mgmt .00 DEVELCNEC,I ; �. 5019 000.345.81.00.0016 Shoreline Subst Dev .00 CIIYoFREiir6: ia,_ 5020 000.345.81.00.0017 Site Plan Approval .00 5021 000.345.81.00.0018 Special Permit Fees .00 APR ei 9 5022 000.345.81.00.0019 Variance Fees .00 5023 0 .00 R 5024 000.345.81.00.0024 Conditional Approval Fee .00 Vit.id 5036 000.345.81.00.0005 Comprehensive Plan Amend .00 5909 000.341.60.00.0024 Booklets/EIS/Copies .00 5941 000.341.50.00.0000 Maps (Taxable) .00 5954 604.237.00.00.0000 Special Deposits .00 5955 000.05.519.90.42.1 Postage .00 5998 000.231.70.00.0000 Tax .00 R KLEINFELDER Prepared for: Mr. Kit Wong TranSystems Corporation 181 Grand Avenue, #400 Oakland, CA 94612 Kleinfelder Project Number: 13668 Preliminary Data Report Geotechnical Investigation Con-Way Dock Facility 400 SW 34th Street Renton,Washington Prepared by: MICROFILMED Brendan R. Fisher, RG, EIT Reviewed by: (Ti) _ � A,,,James M. Schmidt, PE , "PE. 25304Geotechnical Department Manager c/&TE ` /0NAL EN IEXPIRES 8/31/0 3 Kleinfelder, Inc. 2405 — 140th Avenue NE Suite A-101 Bellevue, WA 98005 Phone: (425) 562-4200 Fax: (425) 562-4201 April 9, 2002 Copyright 2002 Kleinfelder, Inc. All Rights Reserved This document was prepared for use only by the client,only for the purposes stated,and within a reasonable time from issuance.Non- commercial,educational and scientific use of this report by regulatory agencies is regarded as a"fair use"and not a violation of copyright.Regulatory agencies may make additional copies of this document for internal use.Copies may also be made available to the public as required by law.The reprint must acknowledge the copyright and indicate that permission to reprint has been received. k9 KLEINFELDER TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1 1.2 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF SERVICES 1 2.0 INVESTIGATIVE METHODS 1 2.1 SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION 1 2.2 LABORATORY TESTING 2 3.0 REGIONAL GEOLOGIC SETTING 2 3.1 REGIONAL GEOLOGY 2 3.2 AREA AND SITE GEOLOGY 2 3.3 GEOLOGIC HAZARDS 3 3.3.1 Faulting and Seismicity 3 3.3.2 Seismic Ground Shaking 3 3.3.3 Liquefaction 3 3.4 SEISMIC DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS 4 3.4.1 General 4 3.4.2 UBC Seismic Design Parameters 4 4.0 SITE AND SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 5 4.1 SITE CONDITIONS 5 4.2 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 5 4.3 GROUNDWATER 5 4.4 CORROSIVITY 5 5.0 REFERENCES 6 PLATES Plate 1 - Site Vicinity Map Plate 2 - Boring and Test Pit Plan APPENDICES Appendix A Geotechnical Test Borings Appendix B Laboratory Testing Appendix C ASFE Insert Appendix D Application for Authorization to Use 13668/6002R051.doc Page i of i Copyright 2002 Kleinfelder,Inc. KLEINFELDER 1.0 INTRODUCTION This preliminary report presents the results of our geotechnical investigation for the proposed Con-Way Dock Facility located at 400 SW 34th Street in Renton Washington. The location of the site is shown on Plate 1, Site Vicinity Map. The project site is currently occupied by an existing structure that consists of an office building and an attached loading dock/distribution facility. The remainder of the site is primarily paved with asphaltic concrete pavement with some landscape planters. 1.1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION It is our understanding that the proposed project will consist of the construction of a new dock building that will be steel framed with steel siding, with columns along the perimeter only. Column lads are anticipated to be approximately 55 kips each. The floor slab will be cast over and tied to the foundation wall. The floor slab will be approximately 4 feet above exterior finished grade. The existing dock will be abandoned in place. TranSystems will utilize heavy duty, medium duty, and light duty truck asphaltic concrete and Portland cement concrete pavement sections. We are assuming that heavy duty loading consists of 100 fully loaded 5 axle trucks per day; with 80 percent having an axle weight of 16,000 lbs. and 20 percent having an axle weight of 18,000 lbs. Medium loading will consist of 6 fully loaded trucks per day with above axle weight. Light loading consists of automobile parking. The design life of the pavement shall be 20 years. 1.2 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF SERVICES The purpose of this geotechnical study was to explore and evaluate the subsurface soil conditions at the proposed site and provide preliminary geotechnical recommendations for the design of the new dock foundation, pavements, underground utilities and related construction. This preliminary study also addressed the potential corrosivity of the near-surface soils, the anticipated seismic shaking at the site, groundwater levels, and earthwork construction considerations. 2.0 INVESTIGATIVE METHODS 2.1 SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION Five (5) auger borings (identified as B-1 to B-5) and six (6) test pits (identified as TP-1 to TP-6) were advanced at the site. B-1 through B-5 were advanced to depths of ranging from 21.5 to 61.5 feet below ground surface (bgs). After completion, the borings were backfilled with bentonite 13668/6002R051.doc Page 1 of 6 Copyright 2002 Kleinfelder,Inc. KLEINFELDER grout and the sealed with asphalt concrete patch. TP-1 through TP-6 were excavated to depths ranging from 5 to 14-feet bgs. The test pits were backfill with the original excavated soils. The ground surface was not patched with asphaltic concrete. Selected bulk and disturbed samples were retrieved, sealed, and transported to our Bellevue laboratory for further evaluation. Our typical sampling interval was about 5 feet in the borings and at every soil change in the test pits. The number of blows necessary to drive both a Standard Penetration Test (SPT) sampler were recorded at each of the boring sample locations. A description of the field exploration and a Legend to the Logs of Borings are presented in Appendix A. The locations of the borings and test pits are shown on Plate 2, Boring and Test Pit Plan. 2.2 LABORATORY TESTING Laboratory tests were performed on selected samples at various depths in the borings to evaluate pertinent physical properties of the encountered soils. Details of the laboratory-testing program are presented in Appendix B. 3.0 REGIONAL GEOLOGIC SETTING 3.1 REGIONAL GEOLOGY An extensive account of the geology of Seattle and the surrounding area was authored by Galster and Laprade (1991). The site is located within the Puget Sound Basin Geomorphic Province of Washington. The Puget Sound Basin is a convex eastward basin lying between the Cascade Range and the Olympic Mountains of the coastal range. This area was glaciated a number of times. At least 5 major advances and several lesser advances are recorded. The trend of the ridges, valleys, and deep inlets of Puget Sound is north-south indicating the glacier advance and retreat orientation. Thickness of Quaternary fill is thought to range from 0 to greater than 3,700 feet. Information regarding the bedrock beneath the Quaternary fill is sparse and what we do know is based on limited outcrops, deep borings, and geophysical data. The rocks along the basin flanks are mostly folded and faulted Tertiary marine and estuarine sandstone, shale, and conglomerate intermixed with basalt, andesite, and volcaniclastic rocks. 3.2 AREA AND SITE GEOLOGY There have been several localized studies that geologically map the units underlying the site area. Some of the most current mapping at an effective scale for this study and showing near- 13668/6002R051.doc Page 2 of 6 Copyright 2002 Klein felder,Inc. m K L E I N F E L D E R surface (Quaternary) deposits was performed by Palmer, Schasse, and Norman (1994). They describe the near surface sediments as alluvial deposits that consist of loose to medium-dense cobbles, gravel, pebbly sand, sand, and sandy silt, manmade fill, and modified land. 3.3 GEOLOGIC HAZARDS 3.3.1 Faulting and Seismicity The major fault in the Seattle area is the Seattle Fault. The fault runs east-wets through Seattle, Mercer Island, and south Bellevue. The Seattle Fault is located approximately 7 miles north of the Renton site. 3.3.2 Seismic Ground Shaking Historically, the Puget Sound region has been subjected to frequent earthquakes of moderate intensity and is indicated in the Uniform Building Code as Seismic Zone 3. Three earthquakes that resulted in significant damage occurred in 1949 near Olympia, in 1965 near Seattle, and in 2001 near Olympia. The April 13, 1949 earthquake is the largest recorded earthquake in the region, reaching a magnitude of 7.1 on the Richter scale. It was felt over 150,000 square miles, and resulted in eight deaths and many injuries. The April 29, 1965 earthquake of magnitude 6.5 was felt over 130,000 square miles and resulted in widespread damage in the Seattle area. The February 28, 2001 earthquake of magnitude 6.8 was felt over 150,000 square miles and resulted in widespread damage in Olympia and minor damage in Seattle. Ground failures attributed to liquefaction occurred in many water front areas. Based on our seismic risk analysis, we believe peak ground accelerations at the Renton site would be approximately 0.15g to .25g for an upper and a lower level event, respectively. These earthquakes would have respective magnitudes of approximately 6.5 and 7.5. The lower level event is one with a 50 percent probability of exceedance during a 50-year design life. The upper level earthquake represents a less likely (10 percent probability of exceedance) event for which structures might be expected to show structural damage, but would not collapse. 3.3.3 Liquefaction Liquefaction occurs when saturated and loose, coarse-grained or silty soils are subjected to strong shaking resulting from earthquake motions. The coarse-grained or silty soils typically lose a portion or all of their shear strength, and regain strength sometime after the shaking stops. Soil movements (both vertical and lateral) have been observed under these conditions due to consolidation of the liquefied soils. 13668/6002R051.doc Page 3 of 6 Copyright 2002 Kleinfelder,Inc. R KLEINFELDER The project site is generally underlain loose to medium non-cohesive soils. Groundwater data from the borings and test pit TP-5 indicate that the groundwater encountered during our investigation was at about 14 to 15 feet bgs. We conducted a liquefaction analysis of the subsurface soils using recommendations from Youd and Idriss (2001). For the lower level earthquake, we anticipate that liquefaction at the site is minimal. For the upper level earthquake, we anticipate that liquefaction of the subsurface soils is likely and settlement of the ground surface up to about 4 inches may occur. 3.4 SEISMIC DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS 3.4.1 General The site is located in a seismically active region and the proposed facility can be expected to be subject to some degree of seismic shaking during its design life. Potential seismic hazards at the site which were evaluated include ground shaking, localized liquefaction, ground rupture due to faulting, and seismic settlement. The following sections discuss these potential seismic hazards with respect to this site. 3.4.2 UBC Seismic Design Parameters Structures should be designed for lateral force requirements as set forth in Section 1629.8 of the UBC (1997). Parameters for input to seismic modeling are provided on the basis of information contained in this report, as follows: Table 1: Seismic Design Parameters Seismic Design Recommended Parameter Reference Symbol Value Seismic Source Type UBC Table 16-U A-C B Near Source Factor UBC Table 16-S/T Na,Nv 1.0, 1.0 Seismic Zone UBC Figure 16-2 1-4 3 Seismic Factor UBC Table 16-I Z 0.30 Soil Profile type UBC Table 16-J S SD Seismic Response Coefficient UBC/Table 16-Q/R Ca, Cv 0.36,0.54 13668/6002R051.doc Page 4 of 6 Copyright 2002 Kleinfelder,Inc. k' ■ KLEINFELDER 4.0 SITE AND SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 4.1 SITE CONDITIONS The site of the proposed expansion is a rectangular shaped parcel with total area of about 9-1/4 acres. The site is currently occupied by an existing structure that consists of an office building and a loading dock/distribution facility. The remainder of the site is primarily paved with asphaltic concrete with some landscape planters. 4.2 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS In general, the subsurface soils consist of alluvium. Fill was encountered in test pits that were excavated at the locations of the sanitary sewer (TP-3, TP-4, and TP-6). The remainder of our subsurface excavations encountered the following profile. At the surface, we encountered asphaltic concrete that ranged in thickness from about 3 to 8 inches. The asphalt is thickest along the western side of the existing facility. Beneath the asphalt is a 3 to 12 inch base material consisting of well-graded gravel. The soils encountered during our field investigation generally consisted of about 7 to 8 feet of medium dense to dense silty sand and poorly-graded sand. Beneath the silty sand and poorly-graded sand, we encountered a layer of soft lean clay about 2 to 3-feet thick. The clay is underlain by loose to medium dense sands to about 30 to 34-feet bgs where we encountered another layer of soft lean clay. The clay layer ranges in thickness from about 2 to 6-feet. Beneath the clay, we encountered loose to medium dense silty sand to the termination of borings B-1, B-2, and B-4. 4.3 GROUNDWATER We measured groundwater is borings B-2 through B-4 and in test pit TP-5. Groundwater was encountered at about 14 to 15-feet bgs in those excavations. We also observed perched water above the soft lean clay about 5 to 9 feet bgs in B-1, B-2, and B-4 and TP-3, TP-4 and TP-5. We expect that fluctuations of the groundwater location occur with changes in precipitation rates. 4.4 CORROSIVITY We did not run engineering tests to estimate the corrosivity of the subsurface soils. However, corrosive soils are not prevalent in the Renton area and therefore, we don't anticipate corrosion being a concern at this site. 13668/6002R051.doc Page 5 of 6 Copyright 2002 Kleinfelder,Inc. m KLEINFEI DER 5.0 REFERENCES Galster, R.W., and Laprade, W.T., 1991, Geology of Seattle, Washington, United States of America, Bulletin of the Association of Engineering Geologists, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 235-302. International Conference of Building Officials, 1997, Uniform Building Code, Volume 2. Palmer, S.P., and Schasse, D.K., 1994, Liquefaction Susceptibility for the Des Moines and Renton 7.5-minute Quadrangles, Washington, Washington State Department of Natural Resources, Geologic Map GM-41. United States Geological Survey, 1999, National Seismic Hazard Mapping Project (Web Site). Youd, T.L., and Idriss, I.M., 2001, Liquefaction Resistance of Soils: Summary Report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF Workshops on Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance of Soils,Journal of Geotechnical and Geoevironmental Engineering, Vol. 127, No. 4 pp. 297-313. 13668/6002R051.doc Page 6 of 6 Copyright 2002 Kleinfelder,Inc. } f ■ • •• .p , !Suibsta I1 . , w .� _ • . =oi. %,....n,Taft.iV. , _s Dlsgos ,, -••... , T.-Adifillii,„4141,:ikl.vatvii,, , iiiktkrie%I / ,wi:;,-..-4-7.-,„---___,- I !al _v.. , ........,....:::1::-..: , Em........... , ..,0 : .;: ,,.., : 1,:i-6;•,1 , \ , =air '1 ,,,i' I II 11 - 1 \ —... 1 't 11 0.464.1111i. A �� _ ,. _ a �� , 1116.11111111b41 I . Iv Ilan . 7 ■ • • ( Iloo �t.' • 1+., L , .1 \ • -..t. oa ° �46 �;oa ‘112..... ...., i r _ _„, _ _ T lf,,,,, i �t;�ubs �` ••i• n i� `(• - 1•' `� .1 z. .25 Projec iite t; 11 ukwila.i , • ' n :4, Tumuli 1 - ,..,,,_ ,-.- I . 1 I ' il \''''014:01.- ' v .ri I - - -: __# i • - ------ I I ; 1: , _ , _i_._ I _ .Il. • - J ? if ,..,.._,.....r...„' ., //. ..,,,..._ ,...' * ____ 1 _____ . . ; ler II L...9 . ,-__:Q .. 4 w� •� ,; ' , « -. LI _tJc, i \ I � � -� .�ice. Reference: MAPTECH, USGS Topo Maps, Edition 1.0 Not to Scale Site Vicinity Map PLATE In KLEINFELDER Con-Way Dock Facility 400 SW 34th Street 1 Renton, Washington PROJECT number 13668 April 2002 _ 95.03' 3.5' K X X X K , in / ) . I I_E STAG NG Lo i _ 132.59' - (E) FUEL ISLAND 82.59' 1 r - 1 up I II _i J i_ -2 I- 1� X i_........ , i E____3 I -N L____ Is r l I_ O] I o c3 L_ - -TP-2 I 1--1 r-- I L — I , o, 1 M EXISTING LJ L_ BU DOCK } x N N x X X X X X X X X X TP-1 0 50 100 .-1 SCALE 1"=50' PU1�TE Boring and Test Pit 2A Location Plan 2 2 Reference:Prliminary Con-Way Site Plan,INCA Engineers,Mwvh,2002 1 I 11 I 1 (N) FENCE 5 @ 22' =110' 27' 1_ 3.5' I X - X X X __.)-X X x --X- x L .____-J I 10 x N r - - - i -- in N _ X 0 N X Z 1 I Y c. Cr I Q X r 7r-Ir-Ir-Ir-ir-ir-Ir7r-1 r-Iri r—Ii I Id) II II II II II II II II I I II I 1 II X W I II II II II II II II II II I 1 II I I II I I I II n.) I I II 11 I I I I I I I I 11 I I jj ill it I I I I I I I I 1 1 II I I 1 1 I I I I II i r k.-i l.-J tl--.L-�J L.._I j_.1 I_-- 1-J L--1 1 L�-J L�- .1 o x _ _1_ • a i s r- a a a J L- -I-] I X I 7 ---I--f W 1 -- 5' 26.54'• 2 ' I L_ _I_l I IsI 1 I I 1 I r--_I_] i L- 27.06' 25' !_20 / 20' I / j 20' 11 r— —1_7 L_ _I X v v v v v o 1 II it II ii II II II \II 11 IIII +I II II II 11 II IIII 1 1 II11 III 1� II IIIIIIIIIIII1II1III rII) II II II II II 11 II 1 I II 1 I II LJLJLJLJLJLJLJL LJ LJ LJ LJ I i 8-4 I cv X N W i In In 0 x X x X x X x x X N 0 50 100 rF SCALE:1'=50' , PLATE , Boring and Test Pit j 28 Reference:,'rliminary Con Wey Site Plen,1NCA Enpineers,March, Location Plan h,ppQ2 j J m KLEINFELDER APPENDIX A GEOTECHNICAL TEST BORINGS AND TEST PITS The subsurface conditions at the site were explored on March 25 and 26, 2002. Five (5) auger borings (identified as B-1 through B-5) and six (6) test pits (identified as TP-1 through TP-6) were advanced at the site. B-1 through B-5 were advanced to depths of ranging from 21.5 to 61.5 feet below ground surface(bgs). After completion, the borings were backfilled with bentonite grout and the sealed with asphalt concrete patch. TP-1 through TP-6 were excavated to depths ranging from 5 to 14 feet bgs. The test pits were backfill with the original excavated soils. Selected bulk and disturbed samples were retrieved, sealed, and transported to our laboratory for further evaluation. Our typical sampling interval was about 5 feet in the borings and at every soil change in the test pits. The number of blows necessary to drive both a Standard Penetration Test (SPT) sampler were recorded at each of the boring sample locations. A description of the field exploration and a Legend to the Logs of Borings are presented in Appendix A. The locations of the borings and test pits are shown on Plate 2A and 2B, Boring and Test Pit Plan. Our engineer maintained a log of each boring and test pit, visually classified soils encountered according to the Unified Soil Classification System (see Plate A-1) and obtained disturbed and bulk samples of the subsurface materials. A key to the Logs of Borings and Test Pits is presented on Plate A-2 of this appendix; Logs of Borings are presented on Plate A-2 through A- 6; Log of Test Pits are presented on Plate A-7 through A-12. In the test borings, soil samples were obtained using a Standard Penetration Sampler driven 18 inches into undisturbed soil using a 30-inch drop of a 140-pound hammer. Blow counts were recorded at 6-inch intervals for each sample attempt and are reported on the logs in terms of blows-per-foot for the last foot of penetration. Bulk samples of the near-surface soils were obtained from the test pits. Soil samples obtained from the borings and test pits were packaged and sealed in the field to reduce moisture loss, and returned to our Bellevue laboratory for further testing. 13668,6002R051.doc Page 1 of 1 Copyright 2002 Kleinfelder,Inc. SOIL CLASSIFICATION CHART MAJOR DIVISIONS SYMBOLS TYPICAL GRAPH LEI 1 ER DESCRIPTIONS _ V°_°°"°_O WELL-GRADED GRAVELS, GRAVEL - CLEAN �0Q °°°00 GW SAND MIXTURES, LITTLE OR NO GRAVEL GRAVELS °°o°°0 0 FINES AND 011,40 006 POORLY—GRADED GRAVELS, (LITTLE OR NO FINES) 4.1•60�• � GRAVEL-SAND MIXTURES, LITTLE GRAVELLY 14�••��•• GP SOILS ��••��••ij OR NO FINES COARSE GRAVELS WITH iil:t'A SILTY GRAVELS, GRAVEL-SAND- GRAINED MORE THAN 50% FINES IP.04:: GM• SILT MIXTURES OF COARSE :•��=•��• SOIL FRACTION �re',Va : (APPRECIABLE Nellie�lWI RETAINED ON ON. AMOUNT OF FINES) •�4��•ri��rb CLAYEY GRAVELS, GRAVEL-SAND- 4 SIEVE 1:0,4t1:11. GC CLAY MIXTURES CLEAN SANDS WELL-GRADED SANDS, GRAVELLY SAND SW SANDS, LITTLE OR NO FINES MORE THAN 50% AND •"" OF MATERIAL IS SANDY (UTTLE OR NO FINES) POORLY-GRADED SANDS, LARGER THAN NO.200 SIEVE SIZE SOILS SP GRAVELLY SAND, LITTLE OR NO FINES MORE THAN 50% SANDS WITH • sILTY' SANDS, SAND-SILT OF COARSE FINES SM MIXTURES FRACTION . .. •. .....- PASSING ON ON. (APPRECIABLE 4 SIEVE CLAYEY AMOUNT OF FINES) '. SC MIXTURESSANDS, SAND-CLAY INORGANIC SILTS AND VERY FINE ML SANDS, LTY OR ROCK S OR RI CLAYEY SILTS WITH SLIGHT PLASTICITY FINE SILTS 7 INORGANIC CLAYS OF LOW TO LIQUID LIMI MEDIUM PLASTICITY, GRAVELLY GRAINED AND LESS THANAN 50 CL CLAYS, SANDY CLAYS, SILT`' SOIL CLAYS CLAYS, LEAN CLAYS OL ORGANIC SILTS AND ORGANIC - SILTY CLAYS OF LOW PLASTICITY MORE THAN 50% INORGANIC SILTS, MICACEOUS OR 0= MATERIAL IS M H DIATOMACEOUS FINE SAND OR SMALLER THAN NO. SILTY SOILS 2)0 SIEVE SIZE SILTS LIQUID UMff INORGANIC CLAYS OF HIGH AND GREATER THAN 50 CH PLASTICITY CLAYS ORGANIC CLAYS OF MEDIUM TO OH HIGH PLASTICITY, ORGANIC SILTS hhN PEAT, HUMUS, SWAMP SOILS WITH HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS PT HIGH ORGANIC CONTENTS P OTE: DUAL SYMBOLS ARE USED TO INDICATE BORDERUNE SOIL CLASSIFICATIONS i Con—Way Dock Facility FIGURE m 400 SW 34th Street Renton, Washington SOIL CLASSIFICATION LEGEND 4 .iiiJ KLEINFE._DER Project: 13668 April 2002 J TESTING PROGRAM U.S.C.S. LABORATORY I FIELD a „ w WELL/PIEZO w we F F u> cn a. w am o SOIL DESCRIPTION m 5 CONSTRUCTION ' CdF, _ _ Zw w a i s d E.. W Hw J : ri7 F A "3 u Q Z >. w F �F-, U o do w p .4 = d �z `n O 3 0Z o'N x "' Surface:Asphaltic Concrete Pavement o e Co ez o z a. G- 0 _ . • Asphaltic Concrete Pavement. GW • • GRAVEL with Sand: brown,moist,dense, _ ;,. 4 fine-to coarse grained. < -- SM '�Silty SAND: gray,moist,dense, z 8.0 7 1A medium-grained. C 17X C - - - 22 - C C ' C. 5 5 2A -grades to wet,medium dense,medium-to z • 7 coarse grained with fine-grained gravel. C.; : C 6 C . - - L - C - .c - F- - CL 7CLAY: brown,moist,soft,lean, unconfined compressive strength=0.5 tsf E7- - 10- 52.0 0 X 3A A (pocket penetrometer). 0 _ c , 2 SP SAND: dark gray,moist to wet,medium f dense,fine-grained. -C F < . C - - -v-- • _ E-- : 15- - 3 4A F- 6 SM :� Silty SAND: dark gray,moist to wet, _ > medium dense,fine-grained. z • 7 C : - - LL SP SAND: dark gray,wet,medium dense, - n fine-grained. c. - - - c J - 5 sA 915 R DATE DRILLED:3-25-02 SURFACE ELEVATION(feet): 20.5 DRILLING METHOD: Hollow Stem Auger/Mud Rota 25 LOGGED BY: B.Fisher TOTAL DEPTH(feet): 46.5 DRILLER: Holt Drilling p, co REVIEWED BY:J.Schmidt DIAMETER OF BORING(in):8" CASING SIZE: o Con-Way Dock Facility Appendix 400 SW 34th Street cc Kil KLEINFELDER Renton, Washington A -2a 0 GF.OTEC NICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL EN SOILS AND MATERIALS TESTING GINEERS BORING LOG - RI 8 PROJECT NUMBER: 13668 B-1 PAGE 1 of 2 TESTING PROGRAM U.S.C.S. LABORATORY FIELD d WELL/PIEZO w e • F F �7 F 8 E a.) x wx w o SOIL DESCRIPTION We V a ,p u W '-aW a x CONSTRUCTION .1 r ZW W a vA L a 'Lm Q F 47 E]„Z ..� ..7 jinn" F' q 3 °u Qn Z > a cnw U G Qc a y 0 a .. cz v) z G Q Oz F S a'N W m� cn 3 o Q a F - : 25 5 X 6A -grades to dense. 14 24 ; n 1: n i ti - 30- - 4 X 7A -grades to medium dense. �' - 11 _C., 4 18 �. • CL 7 CLAY: gray,moist,very soft,lean with --: 35- - 0 SA occasional fine-grained sand and shell fragments. _ 0 A _ ,, I, - - SM Silty SAND: dark gray,wet,loose, - _ fine-grained with occasional shell - - - - fragments. : - 3 40— - 4 9A -X . '' r 4 • r_ 2 .. T - Z • : n 2 45— - 4 X 10A -grades to medium dense. z s 16.5 7 Boring completed to a depth of 46.5 feet Z below ground surface. Perched N groundwater was observed at a depth of 7 a 1 to 8 feet below ground surface. Groundwater level was not measured,due �\ c to the use of mud rotary to drill this boring. i W Boring was backfilled on 03/25/2002. c N *SAMPLER e Cal.(3"OD) M SPT(2"OD) Core ' Shelby Nos. a TYPE Split Spoon Split Spoon Sample • Tube Grab O— Recovery cp ig **HAMMER WEIGHT (30"Drop) (30"Drop) C o Con-Way Dock Facility Appendix �� 400 SW 34th Street $. kl KLEINFELDER Renton, Washington A -2b .. 1- CEOTEC NICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL EN SOILS AND MATERIALS TESTING GINEERS BORING LOG C° E. PROJECT NUMBER: 13668 B-1 PAGE 2 of 2 TESTING PROGRAM LABORATORY FIELD U.S.C.S. w WELL/PIEZO w w{1. F • F c.7> o. .E w am SOIL DESCRIPTION x CONSTRUCTION CY.F„ zw w n. v, ` a Q E- w Hz �7 E✓ a 3 d z A 3 Oz H aN w a ,4 ' �z �O �d a c F m" Surface:Asphaltic Concrete Pavement U a .a z O 0 - -'_ - Asphaltic Concrete Pavement. c - GW • y GRAVEL with Sand: brown,moist,dense, _ . •Mine-to coarse grained. SM Silty SAND: gray,moist,dense, - medium-grained. e • 4 1A C 11 X C - 22 -C L. 5 6 2A -grades to wet and loose. -,- - 4X 3 C C L r - 10- - CL 7 CLAY: gray,moist,very soft,lean with -" ; 0 3A trace fine-grained sand,unconfined 0 compressive strength=0.5 tsf(pocket c Apenetrometer), - - 1 SP SAND: gray,moist to wet,loose, T fine-grained with trace organic material. C L - - -L C _ _ - Cf -grades to wet. —H 15- - 2 4A SM "-`'. Silty SAND: gray,moist to wet,loose, i- 2 fine-grained. 3 SP " SAND: dark gray,moist to wet,medium dense,fine-grained with wood fragments. - - 20- - 6 5A - - 7 V; .."..:' - 9 0 �- - - W S 25 a DATE DRILLED:3-25-02 SURFACE ELEVATION(feet): 20.5 DRILLING METHOD:Hollow Stem Auger/Mud Rota ti 1? LOGGED BY: B.Fisher TOTAL DEPTH(feet): 46.5 DRILLER: Holt Drilling 8 REVIEWED BY:J.Schmidt DIAMETER OF BORING(in):8" CASING SIZE: ^ i o Con-Way Dock Facility Appendix Q 400 SW 34th Street PP . kg KLEINFELDER Renton,Washington A -3a N• GEOTEC SOILSL AND ENVIRONMENTAL AND MATERIALS TESTING ENGINEERS BORING LOG " N PROJECT NUMBER: 13668 B-2 PAGE 1 of 2 TESTING PROGRAM U.S.C.S. LABORATORY IFFIELD , WELL/PIEZO w e F F C7 F ; w wx 2 SOIL DESCRIPTION we = CONSTRUCTION ', CCF; ZW W a iiii is .W.7 .aW w [..4.1Z .4- a vv F G 3 i a Z P. 41 F U GI �o R' O c cf 7 P. O Q a F, =. U .1 j Z O = � a. LL J 25 4 6A - - 10 r- _ 13 '- -v 7r. c ;,- C 7 -c C. 30— - 42.0 1 7A CL % CLAY: gray,moist,soft,lean with trace z 1 fine-grained sand,unconfined compressive _c: r 1 A strength=0.5 tsf(pocket penetrometer). - C . SM : Silty SAND: gray,moist,loose to medium dense,fine-grained. i.c. ;- c _ t F L r. 35— - 0 8A CL V_. • CLAY: gray,moist,very soft,lean, F unconfined compressive strength=0.5 tsf c - - 0 L (pocket penetrometer). -z _ C 40— 0 9A % -grades to soft. F 1 G4-- _ z SM •:: Silty SAND: dark gray,moist to wet, - C = medium dense,fine-grained with occasional shell fragments. G - _ . 45— - 4 ioA % - ._ • - - 8 • • - 16.5 9X _ Boring completed to a depth of 46.5 feet - F below ground surface. Perched groundwater was encountered at a depth of 2,1 7 feet below ground surface. Groundwater was encountered at a depth of 14.5 feet \ o below ground surface during drilling. - ' 1 w Boring was backfilled on 03/25/2002. 0 N *SAMPLER e Cal.(3"OD) M SPT(2"OD) fl Core , Shelby m Grab p No TYPE Split Spoon Split Spoon Sample • Tube _ Recovery **HAMMER WEIGHT 3001bs 140Ibs (30"Drop) (30"Drop) o Con-Way Dock Facility Appendix ,„,, 400 SW 34th Street 0 KLEINFELDER Renton,Washington A 3b GEOTEC NICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL EN SOILS AND MATERIALS TESTING GINEERS BORING LOG PROJECT NUMBER: 13668 B-2 PAGE 2 of 2 TESTING PROGRAM LABORATORY IFIELD U.S.C.S. .a . w WELL/PIEZO w We F F 05 F 8 c W aw W o SOIL DESCRIPTION CONSTRUCTION "� Eq.': E ZW W c. i ., a0a m F W Fz i �7, F A 3 a .in z > G Q Oz F. ] aN W a a v� �z u' O 3 0 Co o o F OA" Surface:Asphaltic Concrete Pavement U a a Z O 0 4. 111111 A�haltic Concrete Pavement. GW ' • GRAVEL with Sand: brown,moist,dense, i - - SM \fine-to coarsegrained. Silty SAND with Gravel: gray,moist, A - dense,fine-to medium-grained. _ 4 X 1A . n 19 , - - 24 5 — - 7 X 2A -grades to medium dense. - - - 8 Z 7 r - - CL % CLAY: gray,moist,soft,lean with some - = e. fine-grained sand,unconfined compressive o 10— 1 X 3A strength=0.5 tsf(pocket penetrometer). - -t 1 SM Silty SAND: gray,moist to wet,very loose, -- R 1 fine-grained. - 4 -4 SP SAND: gray,moist,very loose, fine-grained. - ,r- , Y_ ` :.7 -grades to wet. -2- 15— - 0 X 4A - -grades to sand with organic materials. ` J 0 Sand heaving observed in boring during - - drilling. - 0 : A Z -E - - J 20- - 3 X 5A -grades to loose. t = - - 4 _ _ t1.5 — 4 - Boring completed to a depth of 21.5 feet - below ground surface. Groundwater was encountered at a depth of 14 feet below ground surface during drilling. Boring was `r backfilled on 03/25/2002. 0 W j o N DATE DRILLED:3-25-02 SURFACE ELEVATION(feet): 21.0 DRILLING METHOD: Hollow Stem Auger/Mud Rata; F. LOGGED BY: B.Fisher TOTAL DEPTH(feet): 21.5 DRILLER:Holt Drilling REVIEWED BY:J.Schmidt DIAMETER OF BORING(in):8" CASING SIZE: N o Con-Way Dock Facility Appendix Z 400 SW 34th Street 0 c, kg KLEINFELDER Renton,Washington A -4 a GEOTECHNICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS BORING LOG :' .cn - SOILS AND MATERIALS TESTING S PROJECT NUMBER: 13668 B-3 PAGE 1 of 1 TESTING PROGRAM LABORATORY I FIELD U.S.C.S. WELL/PIEZO o F F u> F 8 W w1.aw w o SOIL DESCRIPTION S CONSTRUCTION a lF; Zw W a i s , d t c7r%) F o W F c!F U A QN. o a pr C c d CAz z � 7 A 3 Oz E.. 5 a"N x ga" Surface:Asphaltic Concrete Pavement �_ U _j a -Z o C Aphaltic Concrete Pavement. GW •ik. GRAVEL with Sand: brown,moist,dense, t- - SM '\fine-to coarsegrained. - Silty SAND with Gravel: gray,moist, ,—:n - - dense,medium-to coarse-grained with -z z, 9 X 1A fine-to coarse-grained gravel and C ;; - - .- occasional cobbles to 4"in size. - .7 18 C - 7 - - 17 C : C. _ _ -grades to loose and wet. = 5 2 X 2A -C, _ 7 e - - 4 -�' C: 3 C` - C ! c_ - CL CLAY: gray,moist,soft,lean. -, 5 4 10— 2 3A SM Silty SAND: gray,moist,loose, ne-grained. 7 ;2 fine 7 2 < , r_ • F -C C Y -grades to wet. F- 15- - 2 X 4A -grades to very loose with wood fragments. -t 1 Sand heaving observed in boring during > • - - drilling. 2 z SP SAND: gray,wet,medium dense,fine-to C medium-grained. L. c . e - - ->- `e 20- - 4 SA - - - 7 7-9 X v • N O � o '.,\ > W g 25 — DATE DRILLED:3-26-02 SURFACE ELEVATION(feet): 20.0 DRILLING METHOD: Hollow Stem Auger/Mud Mat : -, LOGGED BY: B.Fisher TOTAL DEPTH(feet): 61.5 DRILLER: Holt Drilling 2 REVIEWED BY:J.Schmidt DIAMETER OF BORING(in):8" CASING SIZE: o Con-Way Dock Facility Appendix -±- 400 SW 34th Street r� CI 0 kg KLEINFELDER Renton,Washington A -5a NICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL EN GEOTEC SOILS AND MATERIALS TESTING GINEERS BORING LOG co o R PROJECT NUMBER: 13668 B-4 PAGE 1 of 3 TESTING PROGRAM U.S.C.S. LABORATORY FIELD al WELL/PIEZO w we F F W F s W .maw W o SOIL DESCRIPTION s CONSTRUCTION a SH ZWW g i s �, . x W z .a n 7v1 FA 3diz z E- �E.w U A Q c D 0 O a c Oz F aN m-- "' -3 L4 a a °z o C '. a c. 25 - - 6 X 6A -grades to fine-grained. �- : c ;= _ - 12 -� - 12 e n 7 C_ - - F G : 7 - C r C. . 30- - 5 7A -(' z • 9- - -C : C: • 11 :X C C L- - • s : F CL CLAY: gray,moist,very soft,lean. 35- - 37.0 0 X 8A 4,_ < c_ _ zSMSilty SAND: dark gray,moist,very loose, <,.; 0 fine-grained with organics and shell z;I: fragments. C '" 40- - - F '. 4 9A ' -grades to loose. a ,, - - 4 - > ::. 5 C - - < - - - - > " 45— - - 6 10A -grades to medium dense. 2 :: 7 v 7 — -P. N N O - :.::': \ - e o - - C> . w 0 50 N *SAMPLER a Cal.(3"OD) M SPT(2"OD) fi Core , Shelby y No TYPE Split Spoon Split Spoon Sample Tube Grab O Recovery co O **HAMMER WEIGHT 3001bs 140 Ibs (30"Drop) (30"Drop) o Con-Way Dock Facility Appendix ;� 400 SW 34th Street ,'' . kIll KLEINFELDER Renton,Washington A -5b GEOTEC SOILS AND MATERIALS TESTING ENGINEERS AND ENVIRONMENTAL BORING LOG PAGE 2 of 3 R PROJECT NUMBER: 13668 B-4 TESTING PROGRAM U.S.C.S. LABORATORY I FIELD W _ " WELL/PIEZO w o F F c7W F E -o�; w .waw w O SOIL DESCRIPTION co = CONSTRUCTION a aF 2 Zw w c -eh- a 0. . E" w E.,Z .a .a v4 F p 3 z w F 4,— U p Qo W: a. O a Q ,,Z = Q OZ F wN Z go.° '4 3 o d a o o E.0 a : z 0 a a cL ;� 50 0 11A -grades to moist to wet and very loose. L` - 0 X ....... 0 • 7 v .. z � C - - - F `c _ z _C . L. . 55— - 3 i • 0 z 61.5 — 1 Boring completed to a depth of 61.5 feet -C below ground surface. Perched groundwater was encountered between 5 to f 7 feet below ground surface. Groundwater -C ' was encountered at a depth of 14.5 feet below ground surface during drilling. -c Boring was backfilled on 03/26/2002. F • _ F z C -0. 6 e! - >' a r - L 7 C, N O 0 1 W ce O - O N *SAMPLER 8 Cal.(3"OD) ® SPT(2"OD) U Core ' Shelby m Grab O No I' TYPE Split Spoon Split Spoon Sample • Tube Recovery 06 $ Drop) WEIGHT 3001bs 1401 (30"Drop) (30"Drop) o Con-Way Dock Facility Appendix 400 SW 34th Street ., . kl I 1 0 KLEINFELDER Renton, Washington A -Sc GEOTECHNICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL AND MATERIALS TESTING ENGINEERS SOILS BORING LOG o PROJECT NUMBER: 13668 B-4 c PAGE 3 of 3 TESTING PROGRAM LABORATORY FIELD U.S.C.S. v WELL/PIEZO w F. F. z� F a .cow aW w o SOIL DESCRIPTION a „ C1 = CONSTRUCTION 'a F W t o a'� Q E. W HW .7 ,U CI �� F, A 3 c°r Q� Z ? A d Oz E. VI ,C,6"4 W 0 g A, .4 ° `t �Z 3 Q 0 o x Surface:Asphaltic Concrete Pavement N- U _, : ° Z O C a. w - c- 0 Aphaltic Concrete Pavement. _ u- - GW • • GRAVEL with Sand: brown,moist,dense, - - ab i fine-to coarse grained. f _ _ SM Silty SAND with Gravel: gray,moist, z f - - dense,fine-to coarse-grained with fine-to -C 7 lA coarse-grained gravel. F- C ! 16 - z, . C"' 24 - - — z . c:, 5 - - -c; c . L - - -C G ' -H 86.0 1 2A CL � CLAY: brown,wet,soft,lean. - F 1 �� < 2 d z C_ F 10- SP SAND: dark gray,moist,medium dense, fine-grained. C v E-: H < 4 3A - - z 7 C 9 cr. E. a 15- _-c C < r c L V: 10 4A . -grades to dense and fine-to F 14 0 medium-grained. .i 16 o - N \ 0 > w g 20 N DATE DRILLED:3-26-02 SURFACE ELEVATION(feet): 20.0 DRILLING METHOD: Hollow Stem Auger/Mud Rota! LOGGED BY: B.Fisher TOTAL DEPTH(feet): 24.0 DRILLER:Holt Drilling M REVIEWED BY:J.Schmidt DIAMETER OF BORING(in):8" CASING SIZE: o Con-Way Dock Facility Appendix z 400 SW 34th Street li CC I I I KLEINFELDER Renton, Washington A -6a NGEOTEC SOILSL AND ENVIRONMENTAL AND MATERIALS TESTING GINEERS BORING LOG PAGE 1 of 2 N PROJECT NUMBER: 13668 B-5 TESTING PROGRAM LABORATORY FIELD U.S.C.S. W � e * ,-• w WELL/PIEZO w wa F F t7� F 6 4 W �w w o SOIL DESCRIPTION 2 go CONSTRUCTION .a C4H g zw W n. (I) aaa aF. W F,,,Z, .4 .� C# 1 F A 3 °u Q a z - w v7 U A Q o a' 0 O e Q j z C 3 QZ 0.,4 COQ a a ea F U a ,. Z O 20 c v C • 3 8 57 5A -• grades to very dense. H - 25 • C 35 \ 24 Boring completed to a depth of 24 feet z below ground surface. Groundwater was encountered at a depth of 15 feet below -C :, ground surface during drilling. Boring was backfilled on 03/26/2002. . z z C . c, • • • -z C r E _• • • _ f - > W *SAMPLER e Cal.(3"OD) M SPT(2"OD) Core ' Shelby m Grab O No TYPE Split Spoon Split Spoon Sample • Tube Recovery **HAMMER WEIGHT 300 Ibs 140 lbs (30 Drop) (30"Drop) o Con-Way Dock Facility Appendix N 400 SW 34th Street cc k�KLEINFELDER Renton, Washington A -6b GEOTECHNICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS u~, SOILS AND MATERIALS TESTING BORING LOG PROJECT NUMBER: 13668 B-5 PAGE 2 of 2 w ., SOIL DESCRIPTION w W x a z w a .4w F., w wQ Surface:Asphaltic Concrete Pavement d Q O zp OTHER TESTS* a zIAsphaItic z v,z Q Concrete Pavement. GW GRAVEL with Sand: brown,moist,dense,fine-to - • i' 4 coarse grained with cobbles. :� (FILL) J1A 0 SP SAND: gray,moist,dense,fine-grained with trace silt. - (ALLUVIUM) Z J 2A O') O� (.5124 CAE O0 O- - r4 t, if 3A �3 E-.O try p U 5 Test pit completed to a depth of 5 feet below ground 0 surface. Groundwater was not encountered during ` excavation. Test pit was backfilled on 03/26/2002. OZ U'N OU cn E-.6.U Q� O� 44 4� U `CO F42O \, . o DATE EXCAVATED:3/26/2002 APPROXIMATE ELEVATION:20.5 LOGGED BY: B.Fisher a c< REVIEWED BY:J.Schmidt EQUIPMENT: Backhoe o o - + ®Bulk m Grab['Shelby Tube SAMPLE TYPE: Y *TESTS:M=Moisture Content(%),D=Dry Density(pcfi, Tv=Torvane, Pp=Pocket Penetrometer,G=Grain Size, G2=%Passing No.200 Sieve,A=Atterberg Limits III KLEINFELDER Con-Way Dock Facility Appendix .:\t11‘ 400 SW 34th Street GEOTECHNICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS A - a m SOILS AND MATERIALS TESTING Renton, Washington w PROJECT NO.13668 TEST PIT LOG TP-1 eil w a SOIL DESCRIPTION w w W a z x w m a a w w Q Surface:Asphaltic Concrete Pavement rn d Q 0 O OTHER TESTS* a z z cnz 0 Asphaltic Concrete Pavement. GW ' GRAVEL with Sand: brown,moist,dense,fine-to :,i coarse grained with cobbles. 1A (FILL)O _I - SP SAND: light brown,moist,medium dense,fine-to irg medium-grained with some gravel and cobbles. c (FILL) qq - I_ 2A SM Silty SAND: gray,moist,medium dense,fine-grained pwith gravel and cobbles. (ALLUVIUM) d I3A zd 00 I 4A W-, _ O� W 44 tip ti qC.) 5 Test pit completed to a depth of 5 feet below ground 2 Oy surface. Groundwater was not encountered during 2 excavation. Test pit was backfilled on 03/26/2002. fl ,z E-,UF., NC b p U `zO n4 w El,CI) o O DATE EXCAVATED:3/26/2002 APPROXIMATE ELEVATION:20 LOGGED BY: B.Fisher o REVIEWED BY:J.Schmidt EQUIPMENT: Backhoe 1.-• y aBulk Grab[' Shelby Tube `, +SAMPLE TYPE: ® � � Y *TESTS:M=Moisture Content(%),D=Dry Density(pcfi, Tv=Torvane, Pp=Pocket Penetrometer,G=Grain Size, :� G2=%Passin.e No. 200 Sieve,A=Atterbere Limits ``g ER Con-Way Dock Facility Appendix co III KLEINFELDER . GEOTECHNICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS 400 SW 34th Street A - 8 a• m SOILS AND MATERIALS TESTING Renton, Washington r CO Ill PROJECT NO.13668 TEST PIT LOG TP-2 ,, SOIL DESCRIPTION w w x z F w gp a a FW. a 2 2 Surface:Asphaltic Concrete Pavement 4 G z z TA v) TA z X OTHER TESTS* Asphaltic Concrete Pavement. GW ' ,, GRAVEL with Sand: brown,moist,dense,fine-to .. :., coarse grained with cobbles. /I. 1A SP ( ILL)_ pSAND: brown,moist,medium dense,fine-to it - medium-grained with some gravel and cobbles. W U (FILL) Q� H2A Z Z SP Silty SAND: gray,moist,medium dense,fine-grained with gravel and occasional cobbles to 8"in size. O O W - (ALLUVIUM) H H 3A �O [ram q U 5 Test pit completed to a depth of 5 feet below ground O surface. Groundwater seepage was observed at a depth of 5 feet below ground surface during excavation. Test O pit was backfilled on 03/26/2002. i;� UQ OU t.'12. H 4� ,e ,'U rO h hw `O o C.), DATE EXCAVATED:3/26/2002 APPROXIMATE ELEVATION:20 LOGGED BY: B.Fisher v 04 REVIEWED BY:J.Schmidt EQUIPMENT: Backhoe > . X Bulk 1 Grab a Shelb+SAMPLE TYPE: Y Tube *TESTS:M=Moisture Content(D/o),D=Dry Density(pcn, Tv=Torvane, Pp=Pocket Penetrometer,G=Grain Size, %t% G2=%Passing No.200 Sieve,A=Atterberz Limits CO N ill KLEINFELDER Con-Way Dock Facility Appendix `- \ GEOTECHNICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS 400 SW 34th Street A - 9 at. SOILS AND MATERIALS TESTING Renton, Washington ui PROJECT NO.13668 TEST PIT LOG TP-3 w SOIL DESCRIPTION w wa a z I- w w a� F Aa • Surface:Asphaltic Concrete Pavement C 0 zp OTHER TESTS* z rn cn wz U 0 Asphaltic Concrete Pavement. GW ' ', GRAVEL with Sand: brown,moist,dense,fine-to ' ,1 coarse grained with cobbles. SP if ILL) pSAND: light brown,moist,medium dense, ti - medium-grained with some gravel and cobbles. 41 U (FILL) qN >r cn Z E, SM Silty SAND: light gray,moist,medium dense, fine-grained with gravel and occasional cobbles to 8"in OU 41 _ size. (.5. (ALLUVIUM) 00 N W O." - 41 t.ZO ti 0 U 5 Test pit completed to a depth of 5 feet below ground O surface. Groundwater seepage was observed at a depth of 5 feet below ground surface during excavation. Test O Z pit was backfilled on 03/26/2002. UE-. Ocy E- U t z Oz p >"U c4O h ?-1O \\. o O DATE EXCAVATED:3/26/2002 APPROXIMATE ELEVATION:20 LOGGED BY: B.Fisher v 4 REVIEWED BY:J.Schmidt EQUIPMENT: Backhoe 0 4 ®Bulk 1 Grab fl ShelbyTube +SAMPLE TYPE: *TESTS:M=Moisture Content(D/o),D=Dry Density(p0, Tv=Torvane, Pp=Pocket Penetrometer, G=Grain Size, 0 G2=%Passing No.200 Sieve,A=Atterberg Limits Xi KLEINFELDER Con-Way Dock Facility Appendix GEOTECHNICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS 400 SW 34th Street A - 10 a cq SOILS AND MATERIALS TESTING Renton, Washington ul PROJECT NO.13668 TEST PIT LOG TP-4 0 W ,, SOIL DESCRIPTION calwx a z Ex„ w w o`a. F a. 2 2 Surface:Asphaltic Concrete Pavement 2 22 C z o z >. -z 0 p OTHER TESTS* 0 Asphaltic Concrete Pavement. GW ' . GRAVEL with Sand: brown,moist,dense,fine-to :'4 coarse grained with cobbles. (FILk) - 0 _ SP SAND: gray,moist,medium dense,medium-to Y i coarse grained. IA W V (ALLUVIUM) Q1 o� H vw O44� 47 3 in, grades to fine-grained. 2A Qe g- 20 Q v: O` UQ OL.4 64v `z Es.UE` Q� O64 44 4p Q 7 `Y O w '4 O ' -grades to wet(perched groundwater observed on top of underlying clay). ‘,,. 10 cs, 2 DATE EXCAVATED:3/26/2002 APPROXIMATE ELEVATION:21 LOGGED BY: B.Fisher 0... REVIEWED BY:J.Schmidt EQUIPMENT: Backhoe 0 4 +SAMPLE TYPE: ®Bulk 1 Grab[' Shelby Tube *TESTS:M=Moisture Content(%),D=Dry Density(pcJ), Tv=Torvane, Pp=Pocket Penetrometer, G=Grain Size, G2=%Passing No. 200 Sieve.A=Atterber2 Limits ck8 ''' kg KLEINFELDER Con-Way Dock Facility Appendix GEOTECHNICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS 400 SW 34th Street A - 11 a a m SOILS AND MATERIALS TESTING Renton, Washington Lii PROJECT NO.13668 TEST PIT LOG TP-5 0 ,, SOIL DESCRIPTION w wx a z E-. w 0: a CL It oa Surface:Asphaltic Concrete Pavement d �.� O 0 OTHER TESTS* z r v)z 2 u 10 CL CLAY: gray,moist,soft to medium stiff,lean with fine-grained sand. (ALLUVIUM) o - 12 rUV E ii O 3A cn _ GUIG Z'T SP SAND: gray,wet,medium dense,fine-grained. O (ALLUVIUM) �tO Ow U2.2 - C.5y . C� O� 4. r.0 6' Apparent groundwater level during excavation. 41 t.p 6. p U 15 Test pit completed to a depth of 15 feet below ground QO surface. Groundwater was observed perched at a depth '4 of 9 feet below ground surface and at 14 feet below O ground surface during excavation. Test pit was E ti backfilled on 03/26/2002. U' O 4.1 EQ.Z 6.U Oq ,z 4� U 1%O v `O E-,e DATE EXCAVATED:3/26/2002 APPROXIMATE ELEVATION:21 LOGGED BY: B.Fisher vl 4 REVIEWED BY:J.Schmidt EQUIPMENT: Backhoe '- o ix Bulk 1 Grab U ShelbyTube *TESTS:M=Moisture Content(%),D=Dry Density(pc�, Tv=Torvane, Pp=Pocket Penetrometer,G=Grain Size, G2=%Passing No. 200 Sieve,A=Atterber2 Limits 60 Iti KLEINFELDER Con-Way Dock Facility Appendix 4 +SAMPLE TYPE: x 400 SW 34th Street • GI:OTECHNICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS A - 11b L- m SOILS AND MATERIALS TESTING Renton, Washington Lu • PROJECT NO.13668 TEST PIT LOG TP-5 ,, SOIL DESCRIPTION w W x a z Ems,,, W m aa.. aa..m F w Q Surface:Asphaltic Concrete Pavement �4 cA C z c z •ttcn cAz OTHER TESTS* Asphaltic Concrete Pavement. GW ' , GRAVEL with Sand: brown,moist,dense,fine-to ' , coarse-grained with cobbles. SM AFILL1 J ZO SAND:light gray,moist,medium dense,fine-grained. - (ALLUVIUM) 44 �� — O� IA ze O� zz ow z . 00 O� - 4.1 44 E-,o pU 5 Test pit completed to a depth of 5 feet below ground O surface. No groundwater was encountered during ` excavation. Test pit was backfilled on 03/26/2002. H `z t--,U OZ Cl...(;) ee U `C O L ,C=2O %*.‘‘ DATE EXCAVATED:3/26/2002 APPROXIMATE ELEVATION:20.5 LOGGED BY: B.Fisher r REVIEWED BY:J.Schmidt EQUIPMENT: Backhoe 0 +SAMPLE TYPE: ®Bulk Grab Shelby Tube *TESTS:M=Moisture Content(%),D=Dry Density(pcj), Tv=Torvane, ..:X\ Pp=Pocket Penetrometer,G=Grain Size, G2=%Passing No. 200 Sieve,A=Atterber2 Limits tW HEI KLEINFELDER Con-Way Dock Facility Appendix 1' 400 SW 34th Street GEOTECHNICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS A - 12 a m SOILS AND MATERIALS TESTING Renton, Washington cn 111 PROJECT NO.13668 TEST PIT LOG TP-6 KLEINFELDER APPENDIX B LABORATORY TESTING GENERAL Laboratory tests were performed on selected, representative samples as an aid in classifying the soils and to evaluate physical properties of the soils which may affect foundation design and construction procedures. A description of the laboratory-testing program is presented below. Testing was performed in accordance with the following ASTM Standards for Soil Testing, latest revisions. CALIFORNIA BEARING RATIO One CBR was performed on soil collected from test pits TP-1, TP-2, and TP-3. The results of the test pits were used to design asphaltic concrete and Portland cement pavement sections for the dock facility. Test results are presented in Appendix B. GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION Grain size distribution testing was performed on 2 samples collected during our drilling activities. These tests were run to help identify the soil according to the USCS soil engineering classification system. We followed the general guidelines as outlined in ASTM D-422, D-1140, and D-2217. MOISTURE CONTENT Moisture content tests were performed on 5 samples collected during our drilling activities. Natural moisture content was estimated by generally following the guidelines in ASTM D-2216. We also completed natural moisture content tests as part of our grain size analyses. I366&6002R051.doc Page 1 of 1 Copyright 2002 Klein felder,Inc. SIEVE ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Client: Report No. : LOIS Sample Information Proj. Name: Con-Way Dock Facility Ref Report No. Sampled Locn.: B-4, 3A Standard: ASTM D-422, D-1 140, D-2217 Project No.: 13668 10 - 11.5' Soil Sample Weight and Moisture Content Technician: Stacie Steel Soil Type: Wash No. 200 yes Date Received: 3/29/02 Moisture Content ASTM D 2216 Date of Test: 4/1/02 Wet Soil+Tare 1 lbs. 680.47 grams Notes Dry Soil+Tare 1 lbs. 524.00 grams Wt.Tare 1 lbs. 99.96 grams Wt.of Water lbs. 156.47 grams Wt. Dry Soil lbs. 424.04 grams Moisture Content % 36.9% % Wash No.200 ASTM D 1140 Dry Soil+Tare 2 Before lbs. 524.00 grams Wt.Tare 2 lbs. 99.96 grams Dry Soil + Tare 2 After lbs. grams Dry Soil After lbs. -99.96 grams Split at 3/4'? Note: 453.6 grams per pound Sieve Analysis Data Classification Sieve No. Soil Wt Wt. Soil Cum. % Percent Adj. % Inches w tare tare mm Ret. (g) Retained Finer Finer 3" 75.00 100.0 100.0 D 10 Cu Cu=D60/D 10 2" 50.00 100.0 100.0 D30 Cc 1-1/2" 37.50 100.0 100.0 D60 Cc=(D30)(D30)/(D10)(D60) 1 25.00 100.0 100.0 3/4 19.00 100.0 100.0 3/8 9.50 100.0 100.0 4 4.75 100.0 100.0 Percentage of Gravel 10 2.00 100.0 100.0 Percentage of Sand 20 0.85 100.0 100.0 Percentage of Fines 100.0 40 0.43 100.0 100.0 Total 100.0 60 0.25 100.0 100.0 140 0.11 100.0 100.0 200 .075 100.0 100.0 Pan 424.0 100.0 SIEVE ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Client: Trans Systems Report No. : L02S Sample Information Proj. Name: Con-Way Dock Facility Ref Report No. Sampled Locn,: B-5, 5A Standard: ASTM D-422, D-1 140, D-2217 Project No.: 13668 22.5 -24' Soil Sample Weight and Moisture Content Technician: Stacie Steel Soil Type: Wash No. 200 yes Date Received: 3/29/02 Moisture Content ASTM D 2216 Date of Test: 4/1/02 Wet Soil+Tare 1 lbs. 654.36 grams Notes Dry Soil+Tare 1 lbs. 540.00 grams Wt.Tare 1 lbs. 97.60 grams Wt. of Water lbs. 114.36 grams Wt. Dry Soil lbs. 442.40 grams Moisture Content % 25.8% % Wash No.200 ASTM D 1140 Dry Soil+Tare 2 Before lbs. 540.00 grams Wt.Tare 2 lbs. 97.60 grams Dry Soil+ Tare 2 After lbs. 528.00 grams Dry Soil After lbs. 430.40 grams Split at 3/4'? Note: 453.6 grams per pound Sieve Analysis Data Classification Sieve No. Soil Wt Wt. Soil Cum. % Percent Adj. % Inches w tare tare mm Ret. (g) Retained Finer Finer _ 3" 75.00 100.0 100.0 D 10 0.126 Cu 35.10 Cu=D60/D 10 2" 50.00 100.0 100.0 D30 0.523 Cc 0.49 1-1/2" 37.50 100.0 100.0 D60 4.422 Cc=(D30)(D30)/(D10)(D60) 1 25.00 100.0 100.0 3/4 19.00 100.0 100.0 3/8 9.50 100.0 100.0 4 4.75 100.0 100.0 Percentage of Gravel 10 2.00 100.0 100.0 Percentage of Sand 97.3 20 0.85 100.0 100.0 Percentage of Fines 2.7 40 0.43 100.0 100.0 Total 100.0 60 0.25 100.0 100.0 140 0.11 100.0 100.0 200 .075 430.4 97.3 2.7 2.7 Pan 442.4 100.0 SIEVE ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Client: Trans Systems Report No. : LO3S Sample Information Proj. Name: Con-Way Dock Facility Ref Report No. Sampled Locn.: R-1, 3A Standard: ASTM D-422, D-1 140, D-2217 Project No.: 13668 10- 11.5' Soil Sample Weight and Moisture Content Technician: Stacie Steel Soil Type: Wash No. 200 no Date Received: 3/29/02 Moisture Content ASTM D 2216 Date of Test: 4/1/02 Wet Soil+Tare 1 lbs. 716.35 grams Notes Dry Soil+Tare 1 lbs. 506.00 grams Wt.Tare 1 lbs. 99.00 grams Moisture Content Only Wt.of Water lbs. 210.35 grams Wt. Dry Soil lbs. 407.00 grams Moisture Content % 51.7% % Wash No.200 ASTM D 1140 Dry Soil+Tare 2 Before lbs. grams Wt.Tare 2 lbs. grams Dry Soil+ Tare 2 After lbs. grams Dry Soil After lbs. grams Split at 3/4'? Note: 453.6 grams per pound Sieve Analysis Data Classification Sieve No. Soil Wt Wt. Soil Cum. % Percent Adj. % Inches w tare tare min Ret. (g) Retained Finer Finer 3" 75.00 100.0 100.0 D10 Cu Cu=D60/D10 2" 50.00 100.0 100.0 D30 Cc r 1-1/2" 37.50 100.0 100.0 D60 Cc=(D30)(D30)/(D10)(D60) 1 25.00 100.0 100.0 3/4 19.00 100.0 100.0 3/8 9.50 100.0 100.0 4 4.75 100.0 100.0 Percentage of Gravel 10 2.00 100.0 100.0 Percentage of Sand 20 0.85 100.0 100.0 Percentage of Fines 100.0 40 0.43 100.0 100.0 Total 100.0 60 0.25 100.0 100.0 • 140 0.11 100.0 100.0 200 .075 100.0 100.0 Pan 407.0� 100.0 SIEVE ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Client: Trans Systems Report No. : LO4S Sample Information Proj. Name: Con-Way Dock Facility Ref Report No, Sampled Locn.: B-2, 7A Standard: ASTM D-422, D-1 140, D-2217 Project No.: 13668 30 - 31.5' Soil Sample Weight and Moisture Content Technician: Stacie Steel Soil Type: Wash No. 200 no Date Received: 3/29/02 Moisture Content ASTM D 2216 Date of Test: 4/1/02 Wet Soil+Tare 1 lbs. 784.58 grams Notes Dry Soil+Tare 1 lbs. 582.00 grams Wt.Tare 1 lbs. 100.80 grams Moisture Content Only Wt.of Water lbs. 202.58 grams Wt. Dry Soil lbs. 481.20 grams Moisture Content % 42.1% % Wash No.200 ASTM D 1140 • Dry Soil+Tare 2 Before lbs. grams Wt.Tare 2 lbs. grams Dry Soil+ Tare 2 After lbs. grams Dry Soil After lbs. grams Split at 3/4'? Note: 453.6 grams per pound Sieve Analysis Data Classification Sieve No. Soil Wt Wt. Soil Cum. % Percent Adj. % Inches w tare tare mm Ret. (g) Retained Finer Finer 3" 75.00 100.0 100.0 D 10 Cu Cu=D60/D 10 2" 50.00 100.0 100.0 D30 Cc 1-1/2" 37.50 100.0 100.0 D60 Cc=(D30)(D30)/(D10)(D60) 1 25.00 100.0 100.0 3/4 19.00 100.0 100.0 3/8 9.50 100.0 100.0 4 4.75 100.0 100.0 Percentage of Gravel 10 2.00 100.0 100.0 Percentage of Sand 20 0.85 100.0 100.0 Percentage of Fines 100.0 40 0.43 100.0 100.0 Total 100.0 60 0.25 100.0 100.0 140 0.11 100.0 100.0 200 .075 100.0 100.0 Pan 481.2 100.0 SIEVE ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Client: Trans Systems Report No. : L05S Sample Information Proj. Name: Con-Way Dock Facility Ref Report No. Sampled Locn.: B-5, 2A Standard: ASTM D-422, D-1 140, D-2217 Project No.: 13668 30 - 31.5' Soil Sample Weight and Moisture Content Technician: Stacie Steel Soil Type: Wash No. 200 no Date Received: 3/29/02 Moisture Content ASTM D 2216 Date of Test: 4/1/02 Wet Soil+Tare 1 lbs. 559.96 grams Notes Dry Soil+Tare 1 lbs. 348.00 grams Wt.Tare 1 lbs. 100.95 grams Moisture Content Only Wt. of Water lbs. 211.96 grams Wt. Dry Soil lbs. 247.05 grams Moisture Content % 85.8% % Wash No.200 ASTM D 1140 Dry Soil+Tare 2 Before lbs. grams Wt.Tare 2 lbs. grams Dry Soil+ Tare 2 After lbs. grams Dry Soil After lbs. grams Split at 3/4'? Note: 453.6 grams per pound Sieve Analysis Data Classification Sieve No. Soil Wt Wt. Soil Cum. % Percent Adj. % Inches w tare tare mm Ret. (g) Retained Finer Finer 3" 75.00 100.0 100.0 D 10 Cu Cu=D60/D 10 2" 50.00 100.0 100.0 D30 Cc • 1-1/2" 37.50 100.0 100.0 D60 Cc=(D30)(D30)/(D10)(D60) 1 25.00 100.0 100.0 3/4 19.00 100.0 100.0 3/8 9.50 100.0 100.0 4 4.75 100.0 100.0 Percentage of Gravel 10 2.00 100.0 100.0 Percentage of Sand 20 0.85 100.0 100.0 Percentage of Fines 100.0 40 0.43 100.0 100.0 Total 100.0 60 0.25 100.0 100.0 140 0.11 100.0 100.0 200 .075 100.0 100.0 Pan 247.1 100.0 SIEVE ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Client: Trans Systems Report No. : LOGS Sample Information Proj. Name: Con-Way Dock Facility Ref Report No. Sampled Locn.: B-4, 8A Standard: ASTM D-422, D-1140, D-2217 Project No.: 13668 35 -36.5' Soil Sample Weight and Moisture Content Technician: Stacie Steel Soil Type: Wash No.200 no Date Received: 3/29/02 Moisture Content ASTM D 2216 Date of Test: 4/1/02 Wet Soil+Tare 1 lbs. 542.81 grams Notes Dry Soil+Tare 1 lbs. 422.00 grams Wt.Tare 1 lbs. 98.63 grams Moisture Content Only Wt.of Water lbs. 120.81 grams Wt. Dry Soil lbs. 323.37 grams Moisture Content % 37.4% % Wash No.200 ASTM D 1140 Dry Soil+Tare 2 Before lbs. grams Wt.Tare 2 lbs. grams Dry Soil+ Tare 2 After lbs. grams Dry Soil After lbs. grams Split at 3/4'? Note: 453.6 grams per pound Sieve Analysis Data Classification Sieve No. Soil Wt Wt. Soil Cum. % Percent Adj. % Inches w tare tare mm Ret. (g) Retained Finer Finer 3" 75.00 100.0 100.0 D10 Cu Cu=D60/D 10 2" 50.00 100.0 100.0 D30 Cc 1-1/2" 37.50 100.0 100.0 D60 Cc =(D30)(D30)/(D10)(D60) 1 • 25.00 100.0 100.0 3/4 19.00 100.0 100.0 3/8 9.50 100.0 100.0 4 4.75 100.0 100.0 Percentage of Gravel 10 2.00 100.0 100.0 Percentage of Sand 20 0.85 100.0 100.0 Percentage of Fines 100.0 40 0.43 100.0 100.0 Total 100.0 60 0.25 100.0 100.0 140 0.11 100.0 100.0 200 .075 100.0 100.0 Pan 321.4 100.0 SIEVE ANALYSIS WORKSIIEE'T Client: Trans Systems Report No. : L07S Sample Information Proj.Name: Con-Way Dock Facility Ref Report No. Sampled Locn.: B-1, IA Standard: ASTM D-422, D-1 140, D-2217 Project No.: 13668 2.5 -4' Soil Sample Weight and Moisture Content Technician: Stacie Steel Soil Type: Wash No. 200 no Date Received: 3/29/02 Moisture Content ASTM D 2216 Date of Test: 4/1/02 Wet Soil+Tare 1 lbs. 605.30 grams Notes Dry Soil+Tare 1 lbs. 566.00 grams Wt.Tare 1 lbs. 100.42 grams Moisture Content Only Wt.of Water lbs. 39.30 grams Wt. Dry Soil lbs. 465.58 grams Moisture Content % 8.4% % Wash No.200 ASTM D 1140 Dry Soil+Tare 2 Before lbs. 566.00 grams Wt.Tare 2 lbs. 100.42 grams Dry Soil+ Tare 2 After lbs. 290.00 grams Dry Soil After lbs. 189.58 grams Split at 3/4'? Note: 453.6 grams per pound Sieve Analysis Data Classification Sieve No. Soil Wt Wt. Soil Cum. % Percent Adj. % Inches w tare tare mm Ret. (g) Retained Finer Finer 3" 75.00 100.0 100.0 D 10 Cu Cu=D60/D 10 2" 50.00 100.0 100.0 D30 Cc 1-1/2" 37.50 100.0 100.0 D60 0.085 Cc=(D30)(D30)/(D10)(D60) 1 25.00 100.0 100.0 3/4 19.00 100.0 100.0 3/8 9.50 100.0 100.0 4 4.75 100.0 100.0 Percentage of Gravel 10 2.00 100.0 100.0 Percentage of Sand 40.7 20 0.85 100.0 100.0 Percentage of Fines 59.3 40 0.43 100.0 100.0 Total 100.0 60 0.25 100.0 100.0 140 0.11 100.0 100.0 200 .075 189.6 40.7 59.3 59.3 Pan 465.E 100.0 IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT YOUR GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT As the client of a consulting geotechnical engineer.you MOST GEOTECHNICAL FINDINGS ARE should know that site subsurface conditions cause more PROFESSIONAL JUDGMENTS construction problems than any other factor.ASFE/The Site exploration identifies actual subsurface conditions Association of Engineering Firms Practicing in the only at those points where samples are taken.The data Geosciences offers the following suggestions and were extrapolated by your geotechnical engineer who observations to help you manage your risks then applied judgment to render an opinion about overall subsurface conditions.The actual interface A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT IS BASED between materials may be far more gradual or abrupt ON A UNIQUE SET OF PROJECT-SPECIFIC FACTORS than your report indicates.Actual conditions in areas Your geotechnical engineering report is based on a not sampled may differ from those predicted in your subsurface exploration plan designed to consider a report While nothing can be done to prevent such unique set of project-specific factors.These factors situations,you and your geotechnical engineer can work typically include the general nature of the structure together to help minimize their impact Retaining your involved. its size.and configuration.the location of the geotechnical engineer to observe construction can be structure on the site;other improvements,such as particularly beneficial in this respect. access roads. parking lots.and underground utilities; TIONS MEN REPORTS RECOMMENDATIONS and the additional risk created by scope-of-service A CAN R ONLY BE PRELIMINARYCOMDA limitations imposed by the client.To help avoid costly problems.ask your geotechnical engineer to evaluate The construction recommendations included in your how factors that change subsequent to the date of the geotechnical engineer's report are preliminary.because report may affect the report's recommendations. they must be based on the assumption that conditions revealed through selective exploratory sampling are Unless your geotechnical engineer indicates otherwise. indicative of actual conditions throughout a site do not use your geotechnical engineering report: Because actual subsurface conditions can be discerned only during earthwork.you should retain your geo- • when the nature of the proposed structure is technical engineer to observe actual conditions and to changed. for example. if an office building will be finalize recommendations Only the geotechnical erected instead of a parking garage.or a refrigerated engineer who prepared the report is fully familiar with warehouse will be built instead of an unrefrigerated the background information needed to determine one. whether or not the report's recommendations are valid • when the size. eieva'ion.or configuration of the and whether or not the contractor is abiding by appli- proposed st-::cture is altered. cable recommendations The geotechnical engineer who • when the location or orientation of the proposed developed your report cannot assume responsibility or structure is modified. liability for the adequacy of the reports recommenda- • when there is a change of ownership;or tions if another party is retained to observe construction. • for application to an adjacent site. GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES ARE PERFORMED Geotechnical engineers cannot accept responsibility for FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES AND PERSONS problems that may occur if they are not consulted after Consulting geotechnical engineers prepare reports to factors considered in their report's development have meet the specific needs of specific individuals.A report changed. prepared for a civil engineer may not be adequate for a construction contractor or even another civil engineer. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS CAN CHANGE Unless indicated otherwise.your geotechnical engineer A geotechnical engineering report is based on condi- prepared your report expressly for you and expressly for tions that existed at the time of subsurface exploration. . purposes you indicated. No one other than you should Do not base construction decisions on a geotechnical apply this report for its intended purpose without first engineering report whose adequacy may have been conferring with the geotechnical engineer. No party affected by time Speak with your geotechnical consult- should apply this report for any purpose other than that ant to learn if additional tests are advisable before originally contemplated without first conferring with the construction starts Note.too,that additional tests may geotechnical engineer. be required when subsurface conditions are affected by construction operations at or adjacent to the site,or by GEOENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS natural events such as floods.earthquakes.or ground ARE NOT AT ISSUE water fluctuations. Keep your geotechnical consultant Your geotechnical engineering report is not likely to apprised of any such events. relate any findings.conclusions.or recommendations about the potential for hazardous materials existing at mates was not one of the specific purposes for which it the site.The equipment.techniques.and personnel was prepared. In other words.while a contractor may used to perform a geoenvironmental exploration differ gain important knowledge from a report prepared for substantially from those applied in geotechnical another party.the contractor would be well-advised to engineering Contamination can create major risks if discuss the report with your geotechnical engineer and you have no information about the potential for your to perform the additional or alternative work that the site being contaminated.you are advised to speak with contractor believes may be needed to obtain the data your geotechnical consultant for information relating to specifically appropriate for construction cost estimating geoenvironmental issues purposes 1 Some clients believe that it is unwise or unnecessary to give contractors access to their geo- A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT IS technical engineering reports because they hold the SUBJECT TO MISINTERPRETATION mistaken impression that simply disclaiming responsi- Costly problems can occur when other design proles- bility for the accuracy of subsurface information always sionals develop their plans based on misinterpretations insulates them from attendant liability Providing the of a geotechnical engineering report To help avoid best available information to contractors helps prevent misinterpretations. retain your geotechnical engineer to costly constructicn problems It also helps reduce the work with other project design professionals who are adversarial attitudes that can aggravate problems to affected by the geotechnical report Have your geotech- disproportionate scale. nica engineer explain report implications to design professionals affected by them.and then review those READ RESPONSIBILITY CLAUSES CLOSELY design professionals' plans and specifications to see Because geotechnical engineering is based extensively how they have incorporated geotechnical factors. on judgment and opinion, it is far less exact than other Although certain other design professionals may be lam- design disciplines This situation has resulted in wholly iliar with geotechnical concerns, none knows as much unwarranted claims being lodged against geotechnical about them as a competent geotechnical engineer. engineers.To heir prevent this problem. geotechnical engineers have developed a number of clauses for use in BORING LOGS SHOULD NOT BE SEPARATED their contracts. reports. and other documents Responsi- FROM THE REPORT bility clauses are not exculpatory clauses designed to Geotechnical engineers develop final boring logs based transfer geotechnical engineers' liabilities to other upon their interpretation of the field logs (assembled by parties Instead.they are definitive clauses that identify site personnel(and laboratory evaluation of field where geotechnical engineers' responsibilities begin and samples Geotechnical engineers customarily include end Their use helps all parties involved recognize their only final boring logs in their reports Final boring logs individutll responsibilities and take ippropritite down should not under any circumstances be redrawn for Some of these definitive clauses are likely to appear in • inclusion in architectural or other design drawings. your geotechnical engineering report Read them because drafters may commit errors or omissions in the closely Your geotechnical engineer will be pleased to transfer process Although photographic reproduction give fu!i and franK answers to any questions eliminates this problem :t does nothing to minimize the possibility of contractors misinterpreting the logs during RELY ON THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER hid preparation When this occurs.delays.disputes.and FOR ADDITIONAL ASSISTANCE unanticipated costs are the all-too-frequent result. Most ASFE-member consulting geotechnical engineer- ing firms are familiar with a variety of techniques and To minimize the likelihood of boring log misinterpreta- approaches that can be used to help reduce risks for all tion.give contractors ready access to the complete parties to a construction project. from design through geotechnical engineering report prepared or authorized construction. Speak with your geotechnical engineer not for their use. (if access is provided only to the report only about geotechnical issues. but others as well,to prepared for you.you should advise contractors of the learn about approaches that may be of genuine benefit. report s limitations.assuming that a contractor was not You may also wish to obtain certain ASFE publications. one of the specific persons for whom the report was Contact a member of ASFE or ASFE for a complimentary prepared and that developing construction cost esti- directory of ASFE publications ASFE PROFESSIONAL FIRMS PRACTICING IN THE GEOSCIENCES 881 I COLESVILLE ROAD/SUITE G I06/SILVER SPRING. MD 20910 TELEPHONE: 301/565-2733 FACSIMILE. 301/589-2017 copyright 19a2 by ASFE.Inc Unless ASFE grants specific permission to do so.duplication of this document by any means whatsoever is expressly prohibited Re-use of the wording in this document in whole or in part.also is expressly prohibited.and may be done only with the express permission of ASFE or for purposes of review or scholarly research I1GP0294 - - - -- m KLEINFELDER APPLICATION FOR AUTHORIZATION TO USE Preliminary Report of Geotechnical Investigation for Con-Way Dock Facility 400 SW 34th Street Renton, Washington File Number: 13668 Report Date: April 3, 2002 KLEINFELDER, INC. 2405 140th Avenue NE Suite A-101 Bellevue, WA 98005 To whom it may concern: Applicant understands and agrees that the Report for the subject site is a copyrighted document, that Kleinfelder, Inc. is the copyright owner and that unauthorized use or copying of the Report for the site is strictly prohibited without the express written permission of Kleinfelder, Inc. Applicant understands that Kleinfelder, Inc. may withhold such permission at its sole discretion, or grant permission upon such terms and conditions as it deems acceptable. Applicant agrees to accept the contractual terms and conditions between Kleinfelder, Inc. and TranSystems Corporation originally negotiated for preparation of this Report. Use of this Report without permission releases Kleinfelder, Inc. from any liability that may arise from use of this report. To be Completed by Applicant By: (company name) (Print Name) (address) (Signature) Title: (city, state, zip) Date: (telephone) (FAX) Approval of Original Client By: Date: (Print Name) (Signature) For Kleinfelder,Inc.'s use only approved for re-use with additional fee of $ approved for re-use with applicant's agreement to following conditions: Applicant agrees to above terms and understands that findings discussed in report were based on available information and site conditions as noted at time of Geotechnical Investigation. disapproved,report needs to be updated By: _ _ Date: (Kleinfelder, Inc. Project Manager) 13668/6002R051.doc Page 1 of I Copyright 2002 Kleinfelder,Inc. k9 KI EINFELDER Prepared for: Mr. Kit Wong TranSystems Corporation 181 Grand Avenue, #400 Oakland, CA 94612 Kleinfelder Project Number: 13668 Preliminary Conclusions and Recommendations Report Geotechnical Investigation Con-Way Dock Facility 400 SW 34th Street Renton, Washington Prepared by: MICROFILMED Bre dan R. Fisher, RG, EIT 5 M.SC4/ Reviewed by: iP of wmSN,rc O� 41111, �'""mil -o ��se25304 �Q 44, James M. Schmidt, PE e sTea Geotechnical Department Manager /pHAL EN IEXPIRES 8/31/ 03 Kleinfelder, Inc. 2405 — 140th Avenue NE Suite A-101 Bellevue, WA 98005 Phone: (425) 562-4200 Fax: (425) 562-4201 April 9, 2002 Copyright 2002 Kleinfelder,Inc. All Rights Reserved This document was prepared for use only by the client,only for the purposes stated,and within a reasonable time from issuance.Non- commercial,educational and scientific use of this report by regulatory agencies is regarded as a"fair use"and not a violation of copyright.Regulatory agencies may make additional copies of this document for internal use.Copies may also be made available to the public as required by law.The reprint must acknowledge the copyright and indicate that permission to reprint has been received. KLEINFELDER TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 2.0 INTRODUCTION 3 2.1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 3 2.2 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF SERVICES 3 3.0 DISCUSSIONS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS 5 3.1 GEOTECHNICAL FEASIBILITY 5 3.2 SITE PREPARATION RECOMMENDATIONS 5 3.2.1 General 5 3.2.2 Site Stripping and Clearing 5 3.2.3 Existing Pavements 6 3.2.4 Engineered Fill Materials 6 3.2.5 Observations and Testing during Construction 6 3.3 TEMPORARY EXCAVATIONS 7 3.3.1 General 7 3.3.2 Excavations and Slopes 7 3.3.3 Construction Considerations 7 3.4 TRENCH BACKFILL 8 3.4.1 Materials 8 3.4.2 Compaction Criteria 8 3.5 LOADING DOCK FOUNDATIONS 9 3.5.1 General 9 3.5.2 Design for Foundation Loads 9 3.5.3 Estimated Settlement 9 3.5.4 Lateral Resistance 9 3.6 SHALLOW FOUNDATION CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS 10 3.6.1 Footing Excavations 10 3.6.2 Placement of Structural Fill 10 3.7 RETAINING WALLS 11 3.8 PRELIMINARY PAVEMENT SECTIONS 11 4.0 ADDITIONAL SERVICES AND LIMITATIONS 13 4.1 ADDITIONAL SERVICES 13 4.2 LIMITATIONS 14 5.0 CONSTRUCTION RECOMMENDATIONS 14 5.1 GENERAL 14 5.1.1 Description 14 5.1.2 Standard Specifications 14 5.1.3 Reference Standards 14 5.1.4 Geotechnical Engineer 15 5.1.5 Geotechnical Report 15 13668/6002R050.doc Page i of ii Copyright 2002 Kleinfelder,Inc. KLEINFELDER 5.1.6 Construction Site Safety 15 5.2 EARTHWORK 15 5.2.1 General 15 5.2.2 Materials 16 5.2.3 Quality Control 16 5.2.4 Seepage Control 17 5.2.5 General Excavation 17 5.2.6 Structural Excavation 17 5.2.7 Structural Fill Construction 18 5.2.8 Utility Trench Backfilling and Compaction 19 5.3 DRAINAGE 19 5.3.1 General 19 5.3.2 Concrete Slab-on-Grade Drainage 20 5.3.4 Retaining Wall Drainage 20 5.3.5 Pavement Subgrade Drainage 21 5.4 PAVING AND SURFACING 21 5.4.1 General 21 5.4.2 Subgrade Preparation 21 5.4.3 Placement and Compaction of Crushed Rock Base (CRB) Material 22 5.4.4 Placement and Compaction of Asphalt-Treated Base (ATB) Material 22 5.4.5 Placement and Compaction of Asphalt Concrete Pavement (ACP) Materia122 PLATES Plate 1 - Site Vicinity Map Plate 2 - Boring and Test Pit Location Plan APPENDICES Appendix A ASFE Insert Appendix B Application for Authorization to Use 13668/6002R050.doc Page ii of ii Copyright 2002 Kleinfelder,Inc. KLEINFELDER 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Kleinfelder, Inc. conducted a preliminary geotechnical engineering investigation for the TranSystems Corporation (TSC) at the Con-Way Dock Facility site to be located at 400 SW 34th Street in Renton Washington. The project site is currently occupied by an existing structure that consists of an office building and an attached loading dock/distribution facility. The remainder of the site is paved with asphaltic concrete pavement. Exisiting pavement at the site consists of a surface layer of asphaltic concrete that ranges in thickness from about 3 to 8 inches. There is a layer of base material beneath the asphaltic concrete about 3 to 12 inches thick. The soils encountered during our field investigation generally consisted of a thin layer of fill and of native alluvial soil deposits.' In general, the native soils encountered are loose to dense silty sands and well-graded sands. We also encountered thin layers of soft clay in the borings. The native soils will provide adequate shallow foundation support as detailed later in this report. Groundwater was encountered at about 14 to 15 feet below the ground surface (bgs). A California Bearing Ratio (CBR) test results indicate that the on-site near surface soils are fair to good quality subgrade material. The on-site near surface soils appear to have low to moderate corrosive potential towards metal and concrete. The recommendations contained within this report are subject to the limitations presented in Section 4 of this report. An information sheet prepared by ASFE (the Association of Engineering Firms Practicing in the Geosciences) is also included as Appendix A. We recommend that all individuals utilizing this report read the limitations along with the attached document. 13668,6002R050.doc Page 1 of 22 Copyright 2002 Kleinfelder,Inc. III KLEINFELDER SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS Design Item Recommended Parameter Reference Report Page Existing Site Condition No. Asphaltic Concrete Pavement Heavy Duty 9.5"AC /14.5" AB 14 Medium Duty 5.0"AC/ 8.0"AB 14 Light Duty 3.0"AC /6.0"AB 14 Concrete Pavement Heavy Duty Approximately 14-15-feet Data Report Existing Site Conditions Data Report Groundwater Depth 14— 15 feet CBR Results 8 11 Native Soils and Structural Fill 12 Bearing Capacity 2,500 psf Data Report Coefficient of Friction 0.4 12 (Soil/Concrete Contact) Subgrade Modulus 150 pci 13668/6002R050.doc Page 2 of 22 Copyright 2002 Kieinfelder,Inc. kg KLEINFELDER 2.0 INTRODUCTION This preliminary report presents the results of our geotechnical investigation for the proposed Con-Way Dock Facility located at 400 SW 34th Street in Renton Washington. The location of the site is shown on Plate 1, Site Vicinity Map. The project site is currently occupied by an existing structure that consists of an office building and a loading dock/distribution facility. The remainder of the site is paved with asphaltic concrete pavement. The preliminary project plans were provided to us by TranSystems. This sketch was used to plot our approximate boring locations, and is presented on Plate 2, Boring and Test Pit Plan. 2.1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION It is our understanding that the proposed project will consist of the construction of a new dock building that will be steel framed with steel siding. Columns will be located along the perimeter with loadings of approximately 55 kips. The floor slab will be cast over and tied to the foundation wall, with the floor approximately 4 feet above exterior finished grade. The existing dock will be abandoned in place. TranSystems will utilize heavy duty, medium duty, and light duty truck asphaltic concrete and Portland cement concrete pavement sections. We are assuming that heavy duty loading consists of 100 fully loaded 5 axle trucks per day, with 80 percent having an axle weight of 16,000 lbs and 20 percent having an axle weight of 18,000 lbs. Medium loading will consist of 6 fully loaded trucks per day with above axle weight. Light loading consists of automobile parking . The design life of the pavement shall be 20 years. 2.2 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF SERVICES The purpose of this preliminary geotechnical study was to explore and evaluate the subsurface soil conditions at the proposed site and provide preliminary geotechnical recommendations for the design of the new dock foundation, pavements, underground utilities and related construction. This preliminary study also addresses the potential corrosivity of the near-surface soils, the anticipated seismic shaking at the site, groundwater levels, and earthwork construction considerations. A description of the scope of services performed is presented below. Task 1 - Literature Review. We began our preliminary investigation by reviewing published and unpublished soils and geologic data in our files and as available from appropriate public agencies (references). 13668/6002R050.doc Page 3 of 22 Copyright 2002 Kleinfelder,Inc. KLEINFELDER Task 2 - Field Exploration. Prior to conducting the field exploration, site utilities were marked in the field by INCA Engineers, the project civil engineer. Five (5) auger borings (identified as B-1 through B-5) and six (6) test pits (identified as TP-1 through TP-6) were advanced at the site. B-1 through B-5 were advanced to depths of ranging from 21.5 to 61.5 feet below ground surface (bgs). After completion, the borings were backfilled with bentonite grout and the sealed with asphaltic concrete patch. TP-1 through TP-6 were excavated to depths ranging from 5 to 14 feet bgs. The test pits were backfill with the original excavated soils. An engineer from Kleinfelder supervised the field drilling operations and logged the borings and test pits. Selected bulk, and disturbed samples were retrieved, sealed and transported to our Bellevue laboratory for further evaluation. The number of blows necessary to drive both a Standard Penetration Test (SPT) sampler a total of 18-inches (in three 6-inch increments) were recorded on the field logs. The locations of the borings and test pits are shown on the Boring and Test Pit Location Plan, Plates 2A and 2B. Task 3 - Laboratory Testing. Laboratory testing was performed on representative bulk, and disturbed samples to substantiate field classifications and to provide engineering parameters for geotechnical design. Testing consisted of natural moisture content, grain size analysis, and CBR. Task 4 - Geotechnical Analyses. Field and laboratory data were analyzed in conjunction with the provided truck traffic frequency and loading. Engineering analyses were conducted to provide preliminary geotechnical recommendations for design and construction of the proposed foundation and pavement sections. We also developed construction recommendations. Task 5 - Report Preparation. This report was prepared presenting our findings, conclusions, and preliminary geotechnical recommendations for design of proposed pavement sections, and loading dock facilities. Recommendations for flexible and rigid pavement, and foundation design are presented. The report also contains a site location map, boring location map, logs of the borings, and laboratory test results. The preliminary geotechnical recommendations contained within this report are subject to the limitations presented in Section 4. An information sheet prepared by ASFE (the Association of Engineering Firms Practicing in the Geosciences) is also included as Appendix A. We recommend that all individuals utilizing this report read the limitations along with the attached document. 13668,6002R050.doc Page 4 of 22 Copyright 2002 Kleinfelder,Inc. k9 KLEINFELDER 3.0 DISCUSSIONS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS 3.1 GEOTECHNICAL FEASIBILITY Based on the preliminary results of our field exploration, limited laboratory testing, and geotechnical analyses conducted for this study, it is our opinion that the proposed construction is geotechnically feasible, provided the recommendations presented in this report are incorporated into the project design and construction. We have provided our preliminary geotechnical recommendations for design of asphaltic and Portland cement concrete pavement sections and loading dock foundation design in the following sections of this report. 3.2 SITE PREPARATION RECOMMENDATIONS 3.2.1 General Site preparation and earthwork operations should be performed in accordance with applicable codes. All references to maximum dry density, optimum moisture content, and relative compaction are in accordance with ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials) Standard Test Method D-1557. 3.2.2 Site Stripping and Clearing Surficial vegetation, organic materials, existing pavements, foundations, slabs and debris should be stripped and isolated prior to site grading or fill placement. Existing pavement and base materials may be suitable for use as engineered fill. If used as fill, asphaltic concrete pavement materials should be ground or crushed such that the maximum particle size does not exceed 4 inches. It is common to encounter soft, wet and/or unstable subgrade soil beneath older pavement sections. These materials, if encountered, should be removed to firm soil and replaced with engineered fill. Thin soft areas may be processed in-place after review and approval by the geotechnical engineer. Following site stripping and clearing operations, and any required over-excavation, the approved excavation bottom should be scarified to a minimum depth of 8 inches, uniformly moisture conditioned to between 0 and 5 percent above the optimum moisture content, and compacted to a minimum of 90 percent relative compaction. The upper 8 inches of pavement subgrades in cut areas should be compacted to a minimum of 95 percent relative compaction. Should site grading be performed during or subsequent to wet weather, near-surface site soils may be significantly above optimum moisture content. Perched groundwater may also develop above the hardpan layer that could cause saturation of the near-surface materials. These I3668i6002R050.doc Page 5 of 22 Copyright 2002 Kleinfelder,Inc. m KLEINFELDER conditions could hamper equipment maneuverability and efforts to compact site soils to the recommended compaction criteria. Disking to aerate, chemical treatment, replacement with drier material, stabilization with a geotextile fabric or grid, or other methods may be required to reduce excessive soil moisture and facilitate earthwork operations. 3.2.3 Existing Pavements We anticipate existing site pavements will provide future support for future traffic. Overlays may be required to reach desired grade. Site elevation and drainage patterns need to be established prior to overlay design. Should existing pavements within the area of planned development may be demolished, depending on site grading requirements, the contractor's capabilities, and other factors, it may be possible (and desirable) to process on-site pavements for reuse as engineered fill and/or aggregate subbase. Processing could involve pulverization, grinding, or other means. Regardless of the method used, for this material to be utilized as engineered fill and/or aggregate subbase, it must meet the applicable requirements provided in Section 3.2.4 for engineered fill or meet the specifications for Base Course if used in pavement sections. 3.2.4 Engineered Fill Materials Engineered fill soils should be nearly free of organic materials, debris or other deleterious materials, and should be essentially non-plastic. In general, well-graded mixtures of gravel, sand, non-plastic silt, and small quantities of cobbles, and/or rock fragments are acceptable for use as engineered fill. Imported fill material, if required, should consist of clean, free-draining sand and gravel containing less than 5 percent fines (silt- and clay-sized particles) based on the fraction passing the '/4-inche sieve. Imported soils to be used for engineered fill should be sampled and tested by the project geotechnical engineer prior to being transported to the site. All imported fill should be compacted to the general recommendations provided for engineered fill. 3.2.5 Observations and Testing during Construction It is recommended that Kleinfelder be retained to review preliminary foundation and earthwork plans and specifications. It has been our experience that this review provides an opportunity to detect whether or not our recommendations have been properly interpreted and to correct possible misunderstandings of our recommendations prior to the start of construction. It is also recommended that Kleinfelder be retained to provide observation and testing services during site earthwork and construction of foundations. This will allow us the opportunity to 13668%6002R050.doc Page 6 of 22 Copyright 2002 Klein felder,Inc. II KLEINFELDER compare actual subsurface soil conditions with those encountered in our investigation and, if necessary, to expedite supplemental recommendations if warranted by the exposed subsurface conditions. All existing fill, if any, should be removed and replaced as properly compacted fill unless documentation is available to show suitability of compaction. Final grading plans should be reviewed by our firm for conformance with our recommendations prior to construction bidding. 3.3 TEMPORARY EXCAVATIONS 3.3.1 General All excavations must comply with applicable local, state, and federal safety regulations including the current WISHA Excavation and Trench Safety Standards. Construction site safety generally is the sole responsibility of the Contractor, who shall also be solely responsible for the means, methods, and sequencing of construction operations. We are providing the information below solely as a service to our client. Under no circumstances should the information provided be interpreted to mean that Kleinfelder is assuming responsibility for construction site safety or the Contractor's activities; such responsibility is not being implied and should not be inferred. 3.3.2 Excavations and Slopes The Contractor should be aware that slope height, slope inclination, or excavation depths (including utility trench excavations) should in no case exceed those specified in local, state, and/or federal safety regulations. Such regulations are strictly enforced and, if they are not followed, the Owner, Contractor, and/or earthwork and utility subcontractors could be liable for substantial penalties. The near-surface soils encountered during our field investigation consisted predominately of silty sands and poorly-graded sands. These soils may stand near vertical in very shallow excavations for short periods of time. Excavations extending deeper that 4 feet where access by construction personnel is required should be sloped back or shored in accordance with applicable regulations. Steeper cut slopes may be utilized for excavations within undisturbed alluvial soils depending on the strength, moisture content, and homogeneity of the materials, as observed in the field. Flatter slopes and/or trench shields may be required if loose, cohesionless soils and/or water are encountered along the slope face. 3.3.3 Construction Considerations Heavy construction equipment, building materials, excavated soil, and vehicular traffic should not be allowed within 1/3 the slope height from the top of any excavation. Where the stability of 13668/6002R050.doc Page 7 of 22 Copyright 2002 Kleinfelder,Inc. k9 KLEINFELDER adjoining buildings, walls, or other structures is endangered by excavation operations, support systems such as shoring, bracing, or underpinning may be required to provide structural stability and to protect personnel working within the excavation. Shoring, bracing, or underpinning required for the project (if any) should be designed by a professional engineer registered in the State of Washington. During wet weather, earthen berms or other methods should be used to prevent runoff water from entering all excavations. All runoff water and/or groundwater encountered within the excavations should be collected and disposed of outside the construction limits. 3.4 TRENCH BACKFILL 3.4.1 Materials Pipe zone backfill (i.e., material beneath and in the immediate vicinity of the pipe) should consist of imported sand or sand-gravel mixtures with maximum particle size of less than one inch. Trench zone backfill (i.e., material placed between the pipe zone backfill and finished subgrade) may consist of native or imported soil which meets the requirements for engineered fill provided above. In general, coarse-grained sand and/or gravel is not recommended for pipe or trench zone backfill due to the potential for soil migration into the relatively large void spaces present in this type of material and water seepage along trenches backfilled with coarse-grained sand and/or gravel. If coarse-grained backfill is selected, please contact our office for additional recommendations. Recommendations provided above for pipe zone backfill are minimum requirements only. More stringent material specifications may be required to fulfill local building requirements and/or bedding requirements for specific types of pipes. We recommend the project Civil Engineer develop these material specifications based on planned pipe types, bedding conditions, and other factors beyond the scope of this study. 3.4.2 Compaction Criteria The trench material should be moisture conditioned to within 3 percent of Optimum Moisture Content, placed in level lifts not exceeding 8 inches in loose thickness, and compacted to the specified percent compaction to produce a firm and unyielding surface. If field density tests indicate the required percent compaction has not been obtained or the surface is pumping and weaving under construction traffic, the fill material should be 13668/6002R050.doc Page 8 of 22 Copyright 2002 Kleinfelder,Inc. kg KLEINFELDER reconditioned as necessary and recompacted to the required percent compaction before placing any additional material. Mechanical compaction is recommended; ponding or jetting should be avoided, especially in areas supporting structural loads or beneath concrete slabs supported-on-grade, pavements, or other improvements. 3.5 LOADING DOCK FOUNDATIONS 3.5.1 General We recommend that the loading dock facility be supported on shallow foundations. Firm and unyielding native undisturbed subsurface soil should provide adequate foundation support. 3.5.2 Design for Foundation Loads Cast-in-place concrete foundation footings should be designed to develop their capacity by bearing on undisturbed native soils or engineered fill at the site. Column footings should have a minimum lateral dimension of 2 feet and have a minimum footing depth of 2 feet below the lowest adjacent grade. Continuous footing should have a minimum lateral dimension of 18 inches wide and have a minimum footing depth of 2 feet below the lowest adjacent grade. An allowable bearing capacity of 2,500 pounds per square foot (psf) can be used for design. 3.5.3 Estimated Settlement Total settlement of each footing is estimated to be less than %z inch. A majority of the settlement should occur shortly after the loads are applied. 3.5.4 Lateral Resistance Resistance to lateral loads (including those due to wind or seismic forces) may also be provided by passive soil pressure against the sides of the foundations. Passive pressure available in engineered fill or undisturbed native soil may be taken as equivalent to the pressure exerted by a fluid weighing 350 pounds per cubic foot (pcf). The top 12 inches of soil should be neglected when evaluating passive resistance unless the area adjacent to the foundation is protected by concrete or pavement. Frictional resistance (force) provided by the subsurface soils can be estimated by assuming the weight of the column and multiplying that by 0.40. 13668'6002R0:0.doc Page 9 of 22 Copyright 2002 Klein felder,Inc. k9 KLEINFELDER Lateral resistance parameters provided above are ultimate values. Therefore, a suitable factor of safety should be applied to these values for design purposes. The appropriate factor of safety will depend on the design condition and should be determined by the project structural engineer. 3.6 SHALLOW FOUNDATION CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS 3.6.1 Footing Excavations Excavation for footings should be performed after site preparation is completed and any necessary structural fill has been satisfactorily compacted in accordance with the specifications. Excavation of footings should be made to avoid disturbing or loosening adjacent soils. Footing excavations should extend the alluvium or engineered fill placed on non-yielding alluvium. Excavations should be kept free of water at all times and all loose material should be removed from excavations prior to placement of formwork, reinforcing steel, concrete, or backfill. The contractor should inform the geotechnical engineer after the footing excavations have been completed and before placement of reinforcing steel, formwork, or concrete. The geotechnical engineer will then observe foundation excavations and provide written confirmation that the footings bear on the expected foundation-bearing material. During wet weather, in areas where the exposed subgrade consists of moisture-sensitive soils, the contractor should take measures to protect foundation excavations once they have been approved by the geotechnical engineer. These measures could include, but are not limited to, placing a layer of pea gravel, crushed rock, or lean concrete on the exposed subgrade, or covering the exposed subgrade with a plastic tent. Additional overexcavation may also be required should the subgrade become wet and deteriorate. During dry weather, the contractor should take measures to protect the foundation excavations' exposed subgrade soils from drying out. These measures may include watering the subgrade as necessary. If the subgrade soils dry out and become loose, they should be moisture conditioned and recompacted to the percent compaction specified. After placing foundation concrete, backfilling with structural fill should be performed. 3.6.2 Placement of Structural Fill This section covers placement and compaction of earth materials to create structural fill. If grading is performed during the wet winter months, generally October through May, we recommend that import fill material be used only if it has been drained sufficiently well to achieve the required compaction. 13668/6002R050.doc Page 10 of 22 Copyright 2002 Kleinfelder,Inc. k9 KLEINFELDER Structural fill material should be moisture conditioned to within 3 percent of Optimum Moisture Content, placed in level lifts not exceeding 8 inches in loose thickness, and compacted to the specified percent compaction to produce a firm and unyielding surface. If field density tests indicate the required percent compaction has not been obtained or the surface is pumping and weaving under construction traffic, the fill material should be reconditioned as necessary and recompacted to the required percent compaction before placing any additional material. 3.7 RETAINING WALLS Retaining walls backfilled with engineered fill should be designed withstand loading from the backfill soils. For non-yielding walls, we recommend using a lateral earth pressure of 55 pcf (equivalent fluid weight). For yielding walls, we recommend using a lateral earth pressure of 35 pcf(equivalent fluid weight). A non-yielding wall is one expected to have less than 1-inch of lateral movement for every 20 feet in wall height. A yielding wall is one expected to have greater than 1-inch of lateral movement for every 20 feet in wall height. We understand that the proposed new foundation will be located about 4 feet from the existing foundation. To decrease the amount of differential settlement between the existing and proposed foundation system, TranSystems should consider using light-weight structural backfill (slag). Imported slag should be tested to confirm that it does not contain any hazardous materials. TranSystems may also consider using a gravel back fill or controlled density (CDF) so that manual compaction of the retaining wall backfill is not required. 3.8 PRELIMINARY PAVEMENT SECTIONS Existing pavement section within heavy traffic areas measured 6 to 8 inches asphaltic concrete and 12 inches of aggregate base. A CBR-Value of 7 was used for design of pavements supported on native soil. Anticipated Heavy vehicle loading indicates the average daily truck traffic of 100 would consist of 16 kip axle loading for 80 percent of the vehicles and 18 kip axle loading for 20 percent of the trucks. This traffic loading would result in a design Traffic Index (TI) of 10.0. Medium loading will consist of 6 fully loaded trucks per day with above axle weight, resulting in a design Traffic Index (TI) of 7.0. Light loading consists of automobile parking with a design Traffic Index (TI) of 5.0. The following flexible pavement sections are recommended for use in design: TABLE 2 13668/6002R050.doc Page I I of 22 Copyright 2002 Klein felder,Inc. m KLEINFELDER RECOMMENDED MINIMUM PAVEMENT SECTIONS Traffic Index Two Layer Section 10.0 (Heavy) 9.5"AC / 14.5"AB 7.0 (Medium) 5"AC/ 8"AB 5.0 (Light) 3"AC/ 6"AB The design criteria assumes a 20-year design period and that normal maintenance (crack sealing, etc.) is performed. The asphaltic concrete (AC) and aggregate base (AB) should conform to, and be placed in accordance with, the WSDOT Standard Specifications. The pavement subgrade should be compacted to 95 percent of maximum density (ASTM D-1557) to a depth of at least six (6) inches. Compaction of subgrade should be achieved immediately prior to placing the pavement section. In addition, it is recommended that all pavement areas conform to the following criteria: 1. All trench backfill, including utility and sprinkler lines, should be properly placed and adequately compacted to provide a stable subgrade. 2. Adequate site drainage should be provided to prevent saturation of the subgrade soil. 3. A periodic maintenance program should be incorporated to include sealing cracks and other measures. 4. All concrete curbs separating pavement and landscaped areas should extend to the subgrade materials. Portland cement concrete pavement (PCCP) may be desirable at entry points, trash enclosures, and other locations where tight-turning heavy vehicles may be maneuvering or trailers are parked. Design recommendations for PCCP are based on standards developed by the Portland Cement Association. For the traffic data provided, we recommend rigid pavement consist of 8 inches of PCCP over 6 inches of aggregate base. The aggregate base and upper 6 inches of subgrade should be compacted to 95 percent of maximum density. The concrete mix design should provide a 28-day compressive strength of at least 4,000 pounds per square inch (psi). The concrete mix should also be designed with air entrainment a slump not 13668'6002R050.doc Page 12 of 22 Copyright 2002 Kleinfelder,Inc. 11/1 KLEINFELDER exceeding 4 inches. Thickened edges should be used along outside edges of concrete pavements. Edge thickness should be at least 2 inches greater than the concrete pavement thickness and taper to the actual concrete pavement thickness 36 inches inward from the edge. Integral curbs may be used in lieu of thickened edges. Continuous section of concrete pavement should be constructed in an approximately 12-foot square grid system or less. If a square system is impractical, rectangular panels having a maximum dimension of 12 feet can be used. Joints should be located at each grid line location, a maximum of 12 feet apart. All longitudinal or transverse control joint should be constructed by saw-cutting, hand forming or placing pre-molded filler such as zip strips. Longitudinal or transverse construction joints should be keyed or smooth doweled to mitigate against differential movement. Expansion joints. should be used to isolate fixed objects abutting or within the pavement area. The expansion joints should extend the full depth of the pavement. Joints should run continuously and extend through integral curbs and thickened edges. We recommend that joint layout be adjusted to coincide with the corner of objects and structures. In the event unstable (pumping) subgrades are encountered within planned pavement areas, we recommend a heavy, rubber-tired vehicle (typically a loaded water truck) be used to test the load/deflection characteristics of the finished subgrade materials. We recommend this vehicle have a minimum rear axle load (at the time of testing) of 16,000 pounds with tires inflated to at least 65 psi pressure. If the tested surface shows a visible deflection extending more than 6 inches from the wheel track at the time of loading, or a visible crack remains after loading, corrective measures should be implemented. Such measures could include disking to aerate, chemical treatment, replacement with drier material, use of geotextile, or other methods. We recommend Kleinfelder be retained to assist in developing which method (or methods) would be applicable for this project. 4.0 ADDITIONAL SERVICES AND LIMITATIONS 4.1 ADDITIONAL SERVICES Additional geotechnical services are recommended for review of construction drawings. We recommend that the final plans and specifications be reviewed for conformance with the recommendations presented in this report. 13668%6002R0 0.doc Page 13 of 22 Copyright 2002 Kleinfelder,Inc. k9 KLEINFELDER 4.2 LIMITATIONS The preliminary recommendations contained in this report are for the proposed building and site improvements as described in this report. Our recommendations are based on field observations, data from published literatures for the project site, data from the field exploration, laboratory tests, and our present knowledge of the proposed construction. It is possible that subsurface conditions could vary between and beyond the points explored. If soil and groundwater conditions are encountered during construction which differ from those described herein, Kleinfelder should be notified immediately in order that a review may be made an any supplemental recommendations provided. If the scope of the proposed construction including proposed loads, grades, or structure locations change from that described in this report, our recommendations should also be reviewed. Kleinfelder has prepared this report for the exclusive use of TSC in substantial accordance with the generally accepted geotechnical engineering practice as it exists in the site area at the time of our study. 5.0 CONSTRUCTION RECOMMENDATIONS 5.1 GENERAL 5.1.1 Description This section presents our recommendations for the geotechnical aspects of construction. Our design criteria are based on these construction recommendations; therefore, these recommendations should be incorporated into the project specifications in their entirety. 5.1.2 Standard Specifications Where possible, we refer to the 2002 Edition of the State of Washington Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge, and Municipal Construction. 5.1.3 Reference Standards Reference Standards are referred to by agency or association initials and are from the latest editions of the following : ASTM - American Society for Testing and Materials: Annual Book of ASTM Standards AWS - American Welding Society(Use only if Steel Piles are Recommended) 13668/6002R050.doc Page 14 of 22 Copyright 2002 Klein felder,Inc. k9 KLEINFELDER 5.1.4 Geotechnical Engineer We recommend you retain KLEINFELDER as the geotechnical engineer during construction to observe and test the geotechnical aspects of the contractor's work. This will allow us to compare the actual conditions encountered with those expected by this investigation and to modify our recommendations, if necessary. We will be present at the site on a full-time basis to check that the contractor's work conforms with the geotechnical aspects of the plans and specifications. Our daily field reports and final report form an important record of construction. Observation and testing by the geotechnical engineer, however, should not in any way release the contractor from the responsibility of performing the work in such a manner as to provide a satisfactory job that meets the requirements of the project plans and specifications, or from meeting contractual obligations to the owner. 5.1.5 Geotechnical Report This report has been prepared for design purposes for TransSystems and its design consultants for this project only. The entire report should be provided to contractors for their bidding or estimating, but not as a warranty of the subsurface conditions. We cannot be responsible for the interpretation by others of the information contained in this report. 5.1.6 Construction Site Safety Our scope of services did not include construction safety practices and this report is not intended to direct construction means, methods, techniques, sequences, or procedures, except as specifically described, and then only for consideration in design, not for construction guidance. The contractor should be made responsible for construction site safety and compliance with local, state, and federal requirements. 5.2 EARTHWORK 5.2.1 General Earthwork consists of clearing and stripping, excavating, placing and compacting fill, utility trench backfilling, structural excavating and backfilling, and all subsidiary work necessary to complete the grading of the developed areas to conform with the lines, grades, and slopes shown on the plans. Terms used in this section are defined as follows : 13668,6002R050.doc Page 15 of 22 Copyright 2002 Kleinfelder,Inc. m KLEINFELDER Percent Compaction is the required in-place dry density of the material, expressed as a percentage of the maximum dry density of the same material as determined in the laboratory by ASTM Standard D 1557-91 (Modified Proctor). Optimum Moisture Content is the moisture content (percent by dry weight) corresponding to the maximum dry density of the same material as determined by ASTM Standard D 1557-91. Moisture-Sensitive Soil is on-site soil containing more than 5 percent fines (silt- or clay-sized particles) based on the fraction passing the 3/4-inch sieve. Structural Fill is fill material placed and compacted in areas which underlie structures or pavements. It should consist of either On-Site Fill Material or Select Fill Material compacted to the percent compaction specified in Section 4.2. Foundation-Bearing Soil is the soil on which conventional spread footings are cast. It should consist of undisturbed alluvial exposed by excavation, or structural fill. 5.2.2 Materials On-Site Fill Material is the soil obtained at the project site during excavation (following clearing and stripping) that is free of organic contaminants, perishable material, and rocks or lumps greater than 6 inches in maximum dimension. Alluvial soils can be used as On-Site Fill Material providing they can be appropriately moisture conditioned for compaction. Select Fill Material is imported soil consisting of clean, free-draining sand and gravel containing less than 5 percent fines (silt- and clay-sized particles) based on the fraction passing the 3/4-inch sieve. 5.2.3 Quality Control The contractor should be made responsible for quality control of the earthwork. As the geotechnical engineer provided by the owner, we will observe and test the contractor's work for conformance with the geotechnical aspects of the plans and specifications. The contractor should be required to provide us with every reasonable facility for checking the workmanship for conformance. We will prepare a daily record of our observations and tests, which will be made available to the contractor and to the owner. You may wish to consider making the contractor responsible for retesting work if it fails to meet the requirements of the plans and specifications, and for the associated costs of such retesting. 13668/6002R050.doc Page 16 of 22 Copyright 2002 Kleinfelder,Inc. KLEINFELDER The contractor should submit samples of each of the required earthwork materials to the geotechnical engineer for evaluation and approval prior to use. The samples should be submitted at least 4 days prior to their use and sufficiently in advance of the work to allow the contractor to identify alternative sources if the material proves unsatisfactory. 5.2.4 Seepage Control Runoff or groundwater seepage that would interfere with the contractor's work should be controlled during construction. Control may consist of temporary drainage ditches or subsurface drains. Installation of such measures should be the contractor's responsibility. 5.2.5 General Excavation - General excavation consists of removing unsuitable on-site soils to sufficient depth to achieve design grades. The contractor should be responsible for excavating and disposing of or reusing excavated material. Estimated depths of excavation range from approximately 2 to 10 feet, depending on the specific location. In general, the on-site soils can be excavated using standard earthmoving equipment. If earthwork operations are performed during periods of wet weather, these soils deteriorate in the excavation process. Foundation bearing may also become disturbed, requiring repair. After design grade is reached, exposed soils should be proofrolled and/or hand probed to identify soft or unstable areas requiring additional excavation and replacement with structural fill. Proofrolling should be accomplished with a heavy, rubber-tired vehicle such as a loaded dump truck or a steel drum vibratory roller. Hand probing should be performed by our field engineering technician with a 1/2-inch-diameter steel bar. These procedures help delineate soft or weak soils. Soft soils encountered during proofrolling and hand probing should be excavated and replaced with structural fill. All final surfaces exposed by the complete excavation should be finished true to line and grade and present a smooth, firm surface. After a rainfall, construction equipment travel on the exposed site subgrade should be minimized until the soils have been allowed to dry sufficiently. Otherwise, traffic activity on the wetted subgrade will degrade the exposed materials and result in additional excavation of the disturbed materials. 5.2.6 Structural Excavation The work addressed in this section covers excavation and backfill for structural elements such as the proposed school building foundations and parking and drive areas. 13668,6002R050.doc Page 17 of 22 Copyright 2002 Kleinfelder,Inc. M KLEINFELDER Excavation for footings should be performed after site preparation is completed and any necessary structural fill has been satisfactorily compacted in accordance with the specifications. Excavation of footings should be made so as to avoid disturbing or loosening adjacent soils. Footing excavations should extend into Foundation-Bearing material to the depth shown on the plans. Excavations should be kept free of water at all times and all loose material should be removed from excavations prior to placement of formwork, reinforcing steel, concrete, or backfill. The contractor should inform the geotechnical engineer after the footing excavations have been completed and before placement of reinforcing steel, formwork, or concrete. We will then observe foundation excavations and provide written confirmation that the footings bear on the expected Foundation-Bearing material. During wet weather, in areas where the exposed subgrade consists of Moisture-Sensitive Soils, the contractor should take measures to protect foundation excavations once they have been approved by the geotechnical engineer. These measures could include, but are not limited to, placing a layer of pea gravel, crushed rock, or lean concrete on the exposed subgrade, or covering the exposed subgrade with a plastic tent. If additional overexcavation is required because the subgrade was not protected, the cost of such additional work should be borne by the contractor. During dry weather, the contractor should take measures to protect the foundation excavations' exposed subgrade soils from drying out. These measures may include watering the subgrade as necessary. If the subgrade soils dry out and become loose, they should be moisture conditioned and recompacted to the percent compaction specified. After placing foundation concrete, backfilling with structural fill should be performed. 5.2.7 Structural Fill Construction This section covers placement and compaction of earth materials to create structural fill. If grading is performed during the wet winter months, generally October through May, we recommend that On-Site Fill Material be used only if it has been drained sufficiently well to achieve the required compaction. • The On-Site Fill Material or Select Fill Material should be moisture conditioned to within 3 percent of Optimum Moisture Content, placed in level lifts not exceeding 8 inches in loose 13668/6002R050.doc Page 18 of 22 Copyright 2002 Kleintelder,Inc. IEI KLEINFELDER thickness, and compacted to the specified percent compaction to produce a firm and unyielding surface. If field density tests indicate the required percent compaction has not been obtained or the surface is pumping and weaving under construction traffic, the fill material should be reconditioned as necessary and recompacted to the required percent compaction before placing any additional material. Fill slopes should be compacted by slope rolling and trimming, or should be overfilled and trimmed back to plan grade to expose a firm, smooth surface free of loose material. 5.2.8 Utility Trench Backfilling and Compaction This section covers backfilling of all utility trenches. The contractor should be responsible for the safety of personnel working in utility trenches. We recommend all utility trenches, but particularly those greater than 4 feet in depth, be supported in accordance with state and federal safety regulations. Utility trench backfill should consist of structural fill constructed as recommended herein. If backfilling is performed during periods of wet weather, it may not be possible to achieve adequate compaction with On-Site Fill Material unless it is sufficiently well drained. Within building areas, and the upper 2 feet below subgrade in pavement areas, utility trench backfill should be compacted to at least 95 percent compaction; below 2 feet in pavement areas, it should be compacted to at least 90 percent compaction. Particular care should be taken to make sure bedding or fill material is properly compacted in place to provide adequate support to the pipe. Jetting or flooding is not a substitute for mechanical compaction and should not be allowed. 5.3 DRAINAGE 5.3.1 General This section covers the placement of aggregate drainage materials and drain lines in the areas and to the lines and grades shown on the plans. The materials which should be used are as follows : Capillary Break should consist of a minimum of 4 inches of free-draining sand and gravel containing less than 5 percent fines (silt and clay size particles) based on the fraction passing the 3/4-inch sieve. 13663'6002R050.doc Page 19 of 22 Copyright 2002 Kletnfelder,Inc. KLEINFELDER Free-draining Granular Material should consist of clean„free-draining gravel or crushed rock meeting the requirements of Section 9-03.12 (2), "Gravel Backfill for Walls," in the Standard Specifications. Drain Pipe should be a smooth-walled, rigid PVC or other rigid pipe conforming to the minimum sizes and dimensions shown on the plans. Corrugated plastic pipe should not be used because it has a tendency to crush and become blocked, and is often laid without a gradient. Vapor Barrier should consist of an impermeable membrane of reinforced plastic or equivalent material. 5.3.2 Concrete Slab-on-Grade Drainage After structural and utility trench backfills are satisfactorily compacted and subgrade preparation is completed, the Capillary Break should be placed in a manner to prevent segregation and should be compacted with appropriate vibratory equipment to provide a tight particle interlock. Any free water that has collected in the Capillary Break should be drained or removed by pumping before concrete is placed. The contractor should exercise care during installation of the Vapor Barrier to provide at least 12 inches of overlap between individual sheets. Care should also be exercised during construction to prevent puncturing or tearing the membrane. If such punctures or tears occur, the contractor should cover the affected area with an additional section of Vapor Barrier. 5.3.4 Retaining Wall Drainage After the buried basement or retaining walls have been constructed and immediately before the excavation is backfilled, the contractor should install a drainage system to reduce or eliminate hydrostatic pressures behind the retaining walls in accordance with the details provided in the plans and specifications. The contractor should exercise care in installing all subdrain lines to prevent pipe damage from occurring and should make certain the system has a positive gradient to a permanent discharge system. When installation of drainage materials is complete, the contractor should be responsible for providing a surficial seal as provided in the plans and specifications. 13668.6002R050.doc Page 20 of 22 Copyright 2002 Kletnfelder,Inc. KLEINFELDER 5.3.5 Pavement Subgrade Drainage The contractor should be responsible for maintaining the pavement area subgrade prior to placing the crushed rock or asphalt-treated base material such that surface water does not stand or the subgrade become degraded. 5.4 PAVING AND SURFACING 5.4.1 General This section covers the placement and compaction of aggregate and asphaltic materials in the parking and traffic areas of the site to the lines and grades shown on the plans. The materials which should be used for this purpose are as follows : Crushed Rock Base should consist of clean, free draining gravel or crushed rock meeting the requirements of Section 9-03.9(3) Crushed Surfacing, Base Course in the Standard Specifications. Asphalt Treated Base should consist of a compacted coarse of base material which has been weatherproofed and stabilized by treatment with an asphalt binder. It should meet the requirements of Section 9-03.6 Aggregates for Asphalt Treated Base of the Standard Specifications. Asphalt Concrete Pavement should consist of one or more courses of plant mixed asphalt concrete composed of asphalt and aggregate, with or without mineral filler, mixed in proportions to provide a homogeneous, stable and workable mixture. It should meet the requirements of Section 9-03.8 Aggregates for Asphalt Concrete, for Class B materials, in the Standard Specifications. Paving Asphalt should consist of AR40000W grade asphalt meeting the requirements of Section 9-02.1(4) Paving Asphalt in the Standard Specifications. 5.4.2 Subgrade Preparation After satisfactory installation and compaction of utility trench backfills in areas to be paved, subgrade soils should be moisture conditioned and compacted to provide a firm, smooth, unyielding surface. After compaction, the subgrade should be kept moist to prevent it from drying out and cracking before placement of the Crushed Rock or Asphalt Treated Base Materials. 13668/6002R050.doc Page 21 of 22 Copyright 2002 Kleinfelder,Inc. I9 KLEINFELDER 5.4.3 Placement and Compaction of Crushed Rock Base(CRB) Material After satisfactory completion of subgrade preparation, the Crushed Rock Base should be placed in a manner to prevent segregation and should be compacted with vibratory compaction equipment to provide a tight interlock between aggregate particles. 5.4.4 Placement and Compaction of Asphalt-Treated Base(ATB)Material After satisfactory compaction of the pavement subgrade to the lines and grades shown on the plans and described in the specifications, the contractor should be responsible for treating the subgrade in preparation for placement of ATB. On completion of the preparatory treatment, the contractor should be responsible for placing and compacting the ATB in such a manner as to pro- vide a thoroughly compacted, homogeneous base on which to construct an asphalt pavement. Subgrade preparation and placement and compaction of ATB should be performed in accordance with the requirements of Section 4-06, Asphalt Treated Base of the Standard Specifications. 5.4.5 Placement and Compaction of Asphalt Concrete Pavement(ACP) Material After placement and compaction of either a CRB or ATB base layer, the contractor should be responsible for the preparation of the exposed base layer surface, the placement and the compaction of an ACP course, or courses, to the lines and grades shown on the plans and described in the specifications. The ACP, its placement, and compaction should meet the requirements of Section 5-04, Asphalt Concrete Pavement of the Standard Specifications. 1366816002R050.doc Page 22 of 22 Copyright 2002 Kleinfelder,Inc. IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT YOUR GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT As the client of a consulting geotechnical engineer.you MOST GEOTECHNICAL FINDINGS ARE should know that site subsurface conditions cause more PROFESSIONAL JUDGMENTS construction problems than any other factor.ASFE/Che Site exploration identifies actual subsurface conditions Association of Engineering Firms Practicing in the only at those points where samples are taken.The data Geosciences offers the following suggestions and were extrapolated by your geotechnical engineer who observations to help you manage your risks then applied judgment to render an opinion about overall subsurface conditions.The actual interface A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT IS BASED between materials may be far more gradual or abrupt ON A UNIQUE SET OF PROJECT-SPECIFIC FACTORS than your report indicates. Actual conditions in areas Your geotechnical engineering report is based on a not sampled may differ from these predicted in your subsurface exploration plan designed to consider a report While nothing can be done to prevent such unique set of project-specific factors.These factors situations.you and your geotechnical engineer can work typically include the general nature of the structure together to help minimize their impact Retaining your involved. its size.and configuration.the location of the geotechnical engineer to observe construction can be structure on the site;other improvements.such as particularly beneficial in this respect. access roads. parking lots,and underground utilities; A REPORTS RECOMMENDATIONS and the additional risk created by scope-of-service limitations imposed by the client.To help avoid costly CAN ONLY BE PRELIMINARY problems.ask your geotechnical engineer to evaluate The construction recommendations included in your how factors that change subsequent to the date of the geotechnical engineer's report are preliminay.because report may affect the report's recommendations. they must be based on the assumption that conditions revealed through selective exploratory sampling are Unless your geotechnical engineer indicates otherwise. indicative of actual conditions throughout a site. do not use your geotechnical engineering report: Because actual subsurface conditions can be discerned only during earthwork,you should retain your geo- • when the nature of the proposed structure is technical engineer to observe actual conditions and to changed. for example. if an office building will be linahze recommendations Only the geotechnical erected instead of a parking garage.or a refrigerated engineer who prepared the report is fully familiar with warehouse will be built instead of an unrefrigerated the background information needed to determine one whether or not the report's recommendations are valid • when the s;_e. elevation.or ccrf;guration of the and whether or not the contractor is abiding by appli- proposed st-.:cture is altered. cable recommendations.The geotechnical engineer who • when the location or orientation of the proposed developed your report cannot assume responsibility or structure is modified. liability for the adequacy of the report's recommenda- • when there is a change of ownership;or tions if another party is retained to observe construction. • for application to an adjacent site. GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES ARE PERFORMED Geotechnical engineers cannot accept responsibility for FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES AND PERSONS problems that may occur if they are not consulted after Consulting geotechnical engineers prepare reports to factors considered in their report's development have meet the specific needs of specific individuals.A report changed. prepared for a civil engineer may not be adequate for a construction contractor or even another civil engineer. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS CAN CHANGE Unless indicated otherwise,your geotechnical engineer A geotechnical engineering report is based on condi- prepared your report expressly for you and expressly for tions that existed at the time of subsurface exploration. . purposes you indicated. No one other than you should Do not base construction decisions on a geotechnical apply this report for its intended purpose without first engineering report whose adequacy may have been conferring with the geotechnical engineer. No party affected by time Speak with your geotechnical consult- should apply this report for any purpose other than that ant to learn if additional tests are advisable before originally contemplated without first conferring with the construction starts.Note.too,that additional tests may geotechnical engineer. be required when subsurface conditions are affected by construction operations at or adjacent to the site,or by GEOENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS natural events such as floods.earthquakes.or ground ARE NOT AT ISSUE water fluctuations. Keep your geotechnical consultant Your geotechnical engineering report is not likely to apprnsed of any such events. relate any findings.conclusions,or recommendations about the potential for hazardous materials existing at mates was not one of the specific purposes for which it the site.The equipment. techniques.and personnel was prepared. In other words.while a contractor may used to perform a geoenvironmental exploration differ gain important knowledge from a report prepared for substantially from those applied in geotechnical another party.the contractor would be well-advised to engineering Contamination can create major risks If discuss the report with your geotechnical engineer and you have no information about the potential for your to perform the additional or alternative work that the site being contaminated.you are advised to speak with contractor believes may be needed to obtain the data your geotechnical consultant for information relating to specifically appropriate for construction cost estimating geoenvironmental issues purposes I Some clients believe that it is unwise or unnecessary to give contractors access to their geo- A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT IS technical engineering reports because they hold the SUBJECT TO MISINTERPRETATION mistaken impression that simply disclaiming responsi- Costly problems can occur when other design profes- bllity for the accuracy of subsurface information always sionals develop their plans based on misinterpretations insulates them from attendant liability Providing the of a geotechnical engineering report To help avoid hest available information to contractors helps prevent misinterpretations. reta,n your geotechnical engineer to costly construction problems It also helps reduce the work with other project design professionals who are adversarial attitudes that can aggravate problems to affected by the geotechnical report Have your geotech- disproportionate scale. nical engineer explain report implications to design professionals affected by them.and then review those READ RESPONSIBILITY CLAUSES CLOSELY design professionals' plans and specifications to see Because geotechnlcal engineering is based extensively how they have incorporated geotechnical factors. on judgment and opinion, it is far less exact than other Although certain other design professionals may be fam- design disciplines This situation has resulted in wholly iliar with geotechnical concerns. none knows as much unwarranted claims being lodged against geotechnical about them as a competent geotechnical engineer. engineers.To help prevent this problem. geotechnical engineers have developed a number of clauses for use in BORING LOGS SHOULD NOT BE SEPARATED their contracts. reports. and other documents Responsi- FROM THE REPORT bility clauses are not exculpatory clauses designed to Geotechnical engineers develop final boring logs based transfer geotechnical engineers' liabilities to other upon their interpretation of the field logs(assembled by parties Instead.they are definitive clauses that identify site personnel)and laboratory evaluation of field where geotechnical engineers' responsibilities begin and samples Geotechnical engineers customarily include end Their use helps all parties involved recognize their only final boring logs in their reports Final boring logs inciivitlu.tl re�pon.lhthties rind take appropriate action should not under any circumstances be redrawn for Some of these definitive clauses are likely to appear in • inclusion in architectural or other design drawings. your geotechnical engineering report Read them because drafters may commit errors or omissions in the closely Your geotechnical engineer will be pleased to transfer process Although photographic reproduction give full and frank answers to any questions eliminates this problem. it does nothing to minimize the possibility of contractors misinterpreting the logs during RELY ON THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER hid preparation When this occurs.delays.disputes.and FOR ADDITIONAL ASSISTANCE unanticipated costs are the all-too-frequent result. Most ASFE-member consulting geotechnical engineer- ing firms are familiar with a variety of techniques and To minimize the likelihood of boring log misinterpreta- approaches that can be used to help reduce risks for all tion.give contractors ready access to the complete parties to a construction project. from design through geotechnical engineering report prepared or authorized construction. Speak with your geotechnical engineer not for their use. (If access is provided only to the report only about geotechnical issues. but others as well.to prepared for you. you should advise contractors of the learn about approaches that may be of genuine benefit. report's limitations, assuming that a contractor was not You may also wish to obtain certain ASFE publications. one of the specific persons for whom the report was Contact a member of ASFE or ASFE for a complimentary prepared and that developing construction cost esti- directory of ASFE publications ASFE PROFESSIONAL FIRMS PRACTICING IN THE GEOSCIENCES 8811 COLESVILLE ROAD/SUITE GI06/SILVER SPRING. MD 20910 TELEPHONE: 301/565-2733 FACSIMILE. 301/589-2017 Cooynght 1992 by ASFE.Inc Unless ASFE grants specific permission to do so.duplication of this document by any means Whatsoever is expressly prohibited Re-use of the wording in this document in whole or in part.also is expressly prohibited.and may be done only with the express permission of ASFE or for purposes of review or scholarly research IIGP029d KLEINFELDER APPLICATION FOR AUTHORIZATION TO USE Preliminary Report of Geotechnical Investigation for Con-Way Dock Facility 400 SW 34th Street Renton, Washington File Number: 13668 Report Date: April 3, 2002 KLEINFELDER, INC. 2405 140th Avenue NE Suite A-101 Bellevue, WA 98005 (425) 562-4200 To whom it may concern: Applicant understands and agrees that the Report for the subject site is a copyrighted document, that Kleinfelder, Inc. is the copyright owner and that unauthorized use or copying of the Report for the site is strictly prohibited without the express written permission of Kleinfelder, Inc. Applicant understands that Kleinfelder, Inc. may withhold such permission at its sole discretion, or grant permission upon such terms and conditions as it deems acceptable. Applicant agrees to accept the contractual terms and conditions between Kleinfelder, Inc. and TranSystems Corporation originally negotiated for preparation of this Report. Use of this Report without permission.releases Kleinfelder, Inc. from any liability that may arise from use of this report. To be Completed by Applicant By: (company name) (Print Name) (address) (Signature) Title: (city, state, zip) Date: (telephone) (FAX) Approval of Original Client By: Date: (Print Name) (Signature) For Kleinfelder,Inc.'s use only approved for re-use with additional fee of $ approved for re-use with applicant's agreement to following conditions: Applicant agrees to above terms and understands that findings discussed in report were based on available information and site conditions as noted at time of Geotechnical Investigation. disapproved,report needs to be updated By: Date: (Kleinfelder, Inc. Project Manager) 13668/6002R050.doc Page I of I Copyright 2002 Kleinfelder,Inc.