Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
RS_ Boeing _Apron A and D Lighting _Habitat Report_210803_v1.pdf
p:\boeing renton\ps21204720 apron a&d lighting habitat study\03 docctrl\aprons_a&d_lighting_improvements_habitat_data_narrative_20210728.docx Habitat Data Narrative Report Aprons A and D Flightline Lighting Upgrade Project Renton, Washington The Boeing Company Prepared for: Säzän Group Renton, Washington Prepared by: Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions, Inc. 3500 188th Street SW, Suite 601 Lynnwood, Washington 98037 USA T: 425-921-4000 Wood Project #PS21204720 July 28, 2021 Habitat Data Narrative Report Aprons A and D Flightline Lighting Upgrade Project Wood Project #PS21204720 | The Boeing Company | July 28, 2021 Page ii Table of contents 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Project Description .............................................................................................................................................................. 1 3.0 Renton Municipal Code 4-8-120D ................................................................................................................................ 1 4.0 Habitat Data Narrative Report ........................................................................................................................................ 2 4.1 Habitat Diversity .................................................................................................................................................. 2 4.2 Migration Corridors ............................................................................................................................................ 3 4.3 Cover Type and Associated Species ............................................................................................................ 3 4.3.1 Vegetative Cover ................................................................................................................................ 4 4.3.2 Associated Fish and Wildlife .......................................................................................................... 5 4.4 Identification of Disturbed Areas .................................................................................................................. 6 4.5 Existing Habitat Values and Functions........................................................................................................ 6 4.5.1 Temperature ......................................................................................................................................... 7 4.5.2 Water Quality ....................................................................................................................................... 7 4.5.3 Reach Sinuosity ................................................................................................................................... 7 4.5.4 Vegetative Conditions ...................................................................................................................... 7 4.5.5 Floodplain Condition ........................................................................................................................ 7 4.5.6 Habitat Values and Functions at the Project Site .................................................................. 8 4.6 Habitat Alterations and Impacts and Proposed Habitat Management Program ...................... 8 5.0 References .............................................................................................................................................................................. 9 List of figures Figure 1 Vicinity and Site Maps Figure 2 Aerial Photo of Project Location List of tables Table 1 Small Mammals Reported to Occur Along the Lower Cedar River Table 2 Birds Reported to Occur Along the Lower Cedar River Table 3 Non-Native Fish Species Introduced into the Lake Washington/Lake Union System Table 4 Different Aquatic Life Uses and Their Associated Numeric Temperature Criteria List of appendices Appendix A Aprons A and D Lighting Improvements Plan Sheets Appendix B Site Photographic Log Appendix C Lighting Criteria Study Habitat Data Narrative Report Aprons A and D Flightline Lighting Upgrade Project Wood Project #PS21204720 | The Boeing Company | July 28, 2021 Page 1 of 10 1.0 Introduction The Boeing Company (Boeing) proposes lighting improvements to aircraft stalls on Aprons A and D at the Boeing Renton plant in Renton, Washington. Project activities are located within the 200-foot Shoreline Setback. As part of permit applications for facility improvements adjacent to shorelines, the Renton Municipal Code (RMC) requires a habitat data report to document existing conditions and describe measures needed to protect shoreline resources. This Habitat Data Narrative Report has been prepared to meet the requirements for Habitat Data Report - Narrative Report, as detailed in RMC 4-8-120D. 2.0 Project Description The proposed lighting improvements include replacing existing high-pressure sodium floodlights with energy-efficient LED light fixtures for stalls A1 through A10 and D1 through D10 (Figures 1 and 2). The proposed lighting replacement activities include: • Removal of flight line pole mounted light fixtures; pole and pole base will be retained for re-use • Installation of new light fixtures; existing light fixtures will be salvaged and re-used if suitable • Maintaining existing lighting controls in stalls A8-A10 • Meeting Boeing standards of stall lighting and mitigating light trespass to the Lower Cedar River • Maintaining existing security cameras The proposed project will occur on the developed property consisting of paved, impermeable surfaces and will not create additional impermeable surface area. No concrete cutting or paving activities will be performed. In addition, there will be no trees or plantings removed or disturbed as part of this project. No construction activities will occur, and no structures will be placed below the ordinary high water mark (OHWM) of the Lower Cedar River (LCR). The light fixtures were selected to mitigate light trespass to the LCR through shielding (cut off shields), upgrading from high-pressure sodium bulbs to LED lamps, the LED lamp color temperature, and proper directional focus on the project site instead of the surrounding environment. Please see Appendix A for the proposed lighting removal and lighting upgrades design sheets. This report describes the habitat attributes of the project site where the proposed project is to occur, as defined by RMC 4-8-120D. 3.0 Renton Municipal Code 4-8-120D Under RMC 4-8-120D (Submittal Requirements—Specific to Application Type: Land Use Applications), the City of Renton requires a Habitat Data Report to be included with Boeing's permit application submittal for the proposed project. Habitat Data Report: Habitat data reports include: a. Site Plan: The site plan shall indicate: i. The vegetative cover types reflecting the general boundaries of the different plant communities on the site; ii. The exact locations and specifications for all activities associated with site development, including the type, extent, and method of operations; iii. Top view and typical cross-section views of critical habitat/wildlife habitat to scale; Habitat Data Narrative Report Aprons A and D Flightline Lighting Upgrade Project Wood Project #PS21204720 | The Boeing Company | July 28, 2021 Page 2 of 10 iv. The results of searches of the State Department of Fish and Wildlife's Natural Heritage and Non-Game Data System databases; v. The results of searches of the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife Priority Habitat and Species database. b. Narrative Report: A narrative report shall be prepared to accompany the site plan, which describes: i. The layers, diversity, and variety of habitat found on the site; ii. The location of any migration or movement corridors; iii. The species typically associated with the cover types, including an identification of any critical wildlife species that might be expected to be found; iv. Identification of any areas that have been previously disturbed or degraded by human activity or natural processes; v. A summary of existing habitat functions and values, utilizing a habitat evaluation procedure or methodology approved by the City; vi. A summary of proposed habitat alterations and impacts and proposed habitat management program. Potential impacts may include but are not limited to clearing of vegetation, fragmentation of wildlife habitat, expected decrease in species diversity or quantity, changes in water quality, increases in human intrusion, and impacts on wetlands or water resources. This report fulfills requirement b above to provide a Habitat Assessment Narrative. Säzän Group retains responsibility for the preparation of a Site Plan to meet the requirement above. 4.0 Habitat Data Narrative Report This section presents the habitat data Narrative Report, as required by the City of Renton and described in RMC 4-8-120D, and provides pertinent habitat and ecological function information for the immediate project site where the proposed project is to occur. 4.1 Habitat Diversity The LCR downstream of Interstate 405 (approximately 1.6 miles) is an artificial channel created early in the 20th century and is completely constrained between levees and revetments. This reach was regularly dredged to prevent flooding from its completion in 1912 until the mid-1970s. Portions of the reach were again dredged in 1999 for the first time since the mid-1970s. In 2016, flood-control dredging occurred in the lower 1.2 miles of the LCR. An 8-foot-high concrete flood-control wall abuts the western riverbank and confines the width of the riparian zone in this area along the river. In-stream habitat in the reach is almost entirely glide, with little habitat complexity. Land uses prevent floodplain connectivity and have eliminated the potential for re-connection with a natural floodplain or the establishment of a riparian corridor. Channelization and existing land use prevent significant large woody debris (LWD) from accumulating in the channel. The reach is also very low-gradient and depositional, and the substrates have high levels of fine sediments (Corps, 2004; Parametrix and Adolfson, 2010). The shoreline along the LCR adjacent to the project site consists of developed property belonging to Boeing and the City of Renton. Habitat Data Narrative Report Aprons A and D Flightline Lighting Upgrade Project Wood Project #PS21204720 | The Boeing Company | July 28, 2021 Page 3 of 10 With the realignment of the Cedar River into Lake Washington in 1912, the zone of sediment deposition was localized through the City of Renton (Perkins, 1994). The vast majority, if not all, of the non-suspendable sediment load is now deposited along this reach because Lake Washington lies at the river's mouth. With the river's path fixed by armored banks, progressive infilling of the channel resulted, sediment is continually deposited downstream 2 miles of the river and an enlarging delta in Lake Washington. The aquatic habitat within the LCR adjacent to the project site consists of a low relief benthic habitat composed of small cobbles with some gravel and no boulders. LWD in the stretch of the LCR adjacent to the project site is extremely limited (Appendix B, Photos 1 to 7). River discharged at the time of site visit on July 22, 2021, was approximately 236 cubic feet per second (USGS, 2021). Channelization of the LCR has eliminated meanders within the lower river, such that the lower 1.6 miles of the river consist of a uniform glide habitat with a nearly complete absence of riffles and pools. Habitat diversity along the LCR adjacent to the project site is extremely limited. 4.2 Migration Corridors A query of Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife's Priority Habitat and Species database (https://wdfw.wa.gov/species-habitats/at-risk/phs/maps) identified five salmonid species that use the LCR as a migration corridor: • Chinook salmon • Coho salmon • Sockeye salmon • Steelhead and rainbow trout • Coastal cutthroat trout Two of the above species, Puget Sound Chinook salmon and Puget Sound steelhead, are listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act. Bull trout, a member of the char family, may also be found in the LCR and is also listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act. Population status information and extent of use of this area are currently unknown. Adult and subadult size individuals have been observed infrequently in the LCR (below Cedar Falls), Lake Washington, and at the Locks. No spawning activity or juvenile rearing has been observed. No distinct spawning populations exist in Lake Washington outside of the upper Cedar River above Lake Chester Morse (not accessible to bull trout within Lake Washington) (King County, 2000). It is unlikely that bull trout use the Cedar River as a migratory corridor. 4.3 Cover Type and Associated Species Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions, Inc. (Wood) staff, Cheyenne Ginther (environmental compliance) and David Sorey (landscape architect) conducted a site survey on July 22, 2021, to assess vegetative cover and habitat along the LCR shoreline adjacent to and within 100 feet upstream and downstream of the proposed project site. Appendix B provides a photographic log depicting habitat conditions and vegetation along the riparian zone of the west bank of the LCR adjacent to the project site. The Apron A portion of the project site is on the west shoreline of the LCR and Renton Municipal Airport, and the Apron D portion of the project site is on the east shoreline of the LCR and the Boeing-Renton facility. Both portions of the project site consist primarily of concrete and asphalt surfaces. Along the west shoreline of the LCR is an 8-foot-high concrete flood-control wall abutting the riverbank and confining Habitat Data Narrative Report Aprons A and D Flightline Lighting Upgrade Project Wood Project #PS21204720 | The Boeing Company | July 28, 2021 Page 4 of 10 the width of the riparian zone in this area along the river. The paved East Perimeter Road abuts the west side of this flood-control wall. Typical plant and animal assemblages and associations that would be expected along the riparian corridor of the LCR are mostly absent along the stretch adjacent to the project site. 4.3.1 Vegetative Cover The riparian zone along the east bank of the LCR adjacent to and within 100 feet upstream and downstream of the project site comprises an approximately 70-foot-wide vegetated band. The vegetated band is bisected by an approximate 9-foot-wide asphalt path (Cedar River Trail) that runs in the upland parallel to the river. The vegetated band consists of a relatively narrow strip (approximately 16 to 22 feet wide) adjacent to the river of primarily planted and volunteer native trees, shrubs, and herbaceous groundcover, with some non-native trees and shrubs present. Representative photos of the riparian habitat adjacent to the project site are provided in Appendix B. No vegetation, including trees, is located within the proposed construction footprint. Native trees and shrubs present on the site include: • Native Tree species: Pacific silver fir (Abies amabilis), madrone (Arbutus menziesii), red alder (Alnus rubra), shore pine (Pinus contorta contorta), black cottonwood (Populus trichocarpa), Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii), Pacific willow (Salix lasiandra), Sitka willow (Salix sitchensis), Western red cedar (Thuja plicata) • Native Shrub species: red osier dogwood (Cornus sericea), Oregon grape (Mahonia aquifolium), Douglas spirea (Spiraea douglasii), Indian plum (Oemleria cerasiformis), western swordfern (Polystichum munitum), nootka rose (Rosa nutkana), snowberry (Symphoricarpos albus) Non-native plant species were observed primarily along the fenceline west of Apron D and the east and west side of the paved path and included: • Non-native Tree species: red maple (Acer rubrum), horse chestnut (Aesculus hippocastanum), ginkgo (Ginkgo biloba), tulip tree (Liriodendron tulipifera) • Non-native Shrub species: butterfly bush (Buddleia davidii), camellia (Camellia sp.), low cotoneaster (Cotoneaster sp.), winged euonymus (Euonymus alatus), hardy fuchsia (Fuschsia sp.), Japanese privet (Ligustrum japonicum), Himalayan blackberry (Rubus armeniacus), and Japanese spirea (Spiraea japonica) Approximately 60 percent of the upland area is grass/lawn. The limited riparian vegetation along the east bank adjacent to the project site and the highly developed shorelines along both banks of the LCR severely limit habitat availability and use by multiple plant and animal species. In addition to the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife's Priority Habitat and Species database referred to above, a query of the Washington Department of Natural Resources' Natural Heritage Program online mapper (https://www.dnr.wa.gov/NHPdata) was performed. No rare plants and rare/high- quality ecosystems were identified in the vicinity of the project site. Critical wildlife species occurring at the project site include the salmonids identified in Section 4.2. Habitat Data Narrative Report Aprons A and D Flightline Lighting Upgrade Project Wood Project #PS21204720 | The Boeing Company | July 28, 2021 Page 5 of 10 4.3.2 Associated Fish and Wildlife 4.3.2.1 Mammals Given the level of development and paved surface area in the project area, it is likely that only small mammals such as beaver, squirrels, mice, rats, voles, moles, raccoons, opossums, muskrats, and river otters use the riparian areas along the LCR shoreline adjacent to and within 100 feet upstream and downstream of the project areas. A river otter was observed on the west shoreline of the LCR during the site visit. Richter and Azous (1997), conducting small-mammal surveys in a wetland along the LCR, reported 13 species of mammals (Table 1). These and other small mammals common to the Puget lowlands may occur along the LCR adjacent to the project site. 4.3.2.2 Birds Several bird species were observed during the site visit, including American crow (Corvus brachyrhynchos), violet-green swallow (Tachycineta thalassina), osprey (Pandion haliaetus), glaucous-winged gull (Larus glaucescens), gadwall (Marceca strepera), and several unidentified songbird species. Richter and Azous (1997) conducted bird surveys in a wetland of the LCR between late May and mid-June in 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, and 1995 to determine distribution and relative abundance. They reported 58 species of birds (Table 2). King County also reported bird species observations in 2008 and identified changes in bird populations and habitat preferences (King County, 2008). It is likely that all of these birds, as well as other species of birds common to the Puget lowlands, nest or forage in the project vicinity. 4.3.2.3 Amphibians and Reptiles No amphibians or reptiles were observed during the site visit; however, it is likely that amphibian (e.g., Anurans) and reptile species (e.g., turtles) found in the Lake Washington basin may use the areas within the site vicinity. Richter and Azous (1997) reported the occurrence of the following amphibian species in the LCR and King County (King County, 2016): • Ensatina (salamander) (Ensatina eschscholtzii) • Long-toed salamander (Ambystoma macrodactylus) • Northwestern salamander (A. gracile) • Pacific tree frog (Pseudoacris regilla) • Red-legged frog (Rana aurora) • Western red-backed salamander (Plethodon vehiculum) • Bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana) • Pacific giant salamander (Dicamptodonitdae) • Roughskin newt (Taricha granulosa) • Western toad (Anaxyrus boreas) No information was located listing reptile species occurring along the LCR in the project vicinity; however, reptiles listed for King County (King County, 2016, 2008) that could occur in the project vicinity include: • Common garter snake (Thamnophis sirtalis) • Northern alligator lizard (Elgaria coerulea) Habitat Data Narrative Report Aprons A and D Flightline Lighting Upgrade Project Wood Project #PS21204720 | The Boeing Company | July 28, 2021 Page 6 of 10 • Northwestern garter snake (T. ordinoides) • Painted turtle (Chrysemys picta) • Rubber boa (Charina bottae) • Slider (Trachemys scripta) • Western fence lizard (Sceloporus occidentalis) • Western terrestrial garter snake (T. elegans) 4.3.2.4 Fish No fish were observed in the LCR adjacent to the project sites during the site visit. The Lake Washington system, including the LCR adjacent to the project site, hosts many fish species, including five salmonid species: Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha), coho salmon (O. kisutch), sockeye/kokanee salmon (O. nerka), coastal cutthroat trout (O. clarki clarki), and steelhead/rainbow trout (O. mykiss) (King County, 2008; WDFW, 2021). Anadromous forms of each of these species use the Cedar River system as migratory, forage, nursery, and spawning habitat. Individuals are present in the river both as adults during migrations to spawning grounds and as juveniles (Kerwin, 2001). All of these species occur seasonally in the LCR adjacent to the project site. Additionally, there have been isolated reports of coastal/Puget Sound bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) and kokanee occurring in the Lake Washington system; however, it is believed that few bull trout occur in the Lake Washington system if they occur at all. Puget Sound Chinook salmon, Puget Sound steelhead trout, and bull trout are federally listed under the Endangered Species Act. Species endemic to the Lake Washington system include the northern pike minnow (Ptychocheilus oregonensis), peamouth (Mylocheilus caurinus), sculpins (Cottus spp.), and longfin smelt (Spirinchus thaleichthys) (Weitkamp et al., 2000; Wydoski and Whitney, 2003). In addition, twenty-four non-native fish species (Table 3) have been identified in the Lake Washington/Lake Union system. A number of these species are now believed to be no longer present in the system. Some of these species are known to prey on juvenile salmon (e.g., smallmouth bass), while others are potential competitors with juvenile salmonids for food (Kerwin, 2001). 4.4 Identification of Disturbed Areas The entire project area is highly developed and disturbed. As stated in Section 4.1, the lower 1.6 miles of the LCR is an artificially created channel with extensive development along both banks. 4.5 Existing Habitat Values and Functions The LCR adjacent to the project site has very limited habitat value and is low functioning. A combination of two habitat assessment methods was used to provide a qualitative assessment of the existing habitat values and functions. These habitat assessment methods were the U.S. Environment Protection Agency's (EPA's) Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for Use of Wadeable Streams and Rivers (Barbour et al., 1999) and the U.S. Forest Service's Stream Inventory Handbook: Levels I and II (USFS, 2020). Both methods incorporate the use of physicochemical and biological parameters to assess habitat value and functionality. The EPA's Rapid Bioassessment Protocols incorporates benthic invertebrate and fish assemblages data to evaluate habitat value and function. For this project, neither benthic invertebrate nor fish assemblage data were collected as part of the evaluation process due to the necessity of applying for and receiving the necessary permit to gather such data. The habitat assessment is based on physicochemical conditions observed at the project site: Habitat Data Narrative Report Aprons A and D Flightline Lighting Upgrade Project Wood Project #PS21204720 | The Boeing Company | July 28, 2021 Page 7 of 10 • Temperature • Water quality • Reach sinuosity • Vegetative conditions of the stream banks and the riparian zone • Condition of the floodplain (e.g., accessibility from the bank, overflow, and size) Each of the above parameters is discussed below. 4.5.1 Temperature Mean monthly water temperatures in degrees Celsius in the LCR at Renton for the period of March 1992 through September 2020 (USGS, 2021) are as follows: • January – 6.1 • July – 15.8 • February – 6.4 • August – 16.0 • March – 7.6 • September – 13.8 • April – 9.5 • October – 11.0 • May – 11.7 • November – 8.2 • June – 13.4 • December – 6.4 The warmest water temperatures occur during the months of June, July, August, and September; however, even the highest mean monthly temperatures are compliant with Washington State aquatic life temperature criteria (Table 4), with the exception of the char spawning and rearing beneficial use. Char (e.g., bull trout) do not spawn in the LCR, and it is highly unlikely that they use the LCR as rearing habitat. 4.5.2 Water Quality No site-specific water quality data were found for the project site; however, water quality monitoring has been conducted in South Lake Washington by the Washington State Department of Ecology. Washington State's Water Quality Assessment (303[d] & 305[b] Report) (Ecology, 2021) identified exceedances of water quality standards for temperature, pH, and dissolved oxygen in the LCR. No chemical exceedances of state water quality criteria were identified for the LCR adjacent to the project site. 4.5.3 Reach Sinuosity As discussed above, the lower 1.6 miles of the LCR are channelized, and much of the shoreline on both banks is restrained by bulkheads. There is no sinuosity within the entire 1.6 miles of the LCR. Stream sinuosity can provide increased habitat complexity by creating pools, riffles, glides, and the creation of off-channel habitat. 4.5.4 Vegetative Conditions As described previously, riparian vegetation is limited along both banks of the LCR within 100 feet of the project site. As such, habitat diversity and functionality along the reach of the LCR is severely limited. 4.5.5 Floodplain Condition The LCR is an artificially-created channel and is confined by levees and bulkheads on each bank. Except in extreme discharge conditions, the LCR has very little connectivity within its floodplain and virtually no Habitat Data Narrative Report Aprons A and D Flightline Lighting Upgrade Project Wood Project #PS21204720 | The Boeing Company | July 28, 2021 Page 8 of 10 potential for formation of off-channel habitat within the floodplain. Because of the low gradient of the LCR, it functions as a sediment depositional zone. The City of Renton and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers periodically dredges the LCR for flood-control purposes. The City of Renton last performed flood-control dredging back in 2016. 4.5.6 Habitat Values and Functions at the Project Site A qualitative assessment of the LCR adjacent to the project site indicates that it provides very low habitat value and function due primarily to the sparse riparian vegetation and habitat complexity. 4.5.6.1 Ecological Function Riparian habitats have important ecological functions other than providing habitat for birds and other wildlife. Healthy riparian vegetation protects banks from erosion, influences in-channel aquatic habitats, maintains favorable water temperature for fish through shading, filters runoff, and provides nutrients. Riparian vegetation creates meanders, increases habitat complexity, and can protect against scour during severe storm events. Riparian habitats link upland and aquatic habitats. Upland habitats have a critical role in the watershed function and affect riparian and aquatic habitats, particularly in drier, low-elevation sites. The riparian zone along the east and west banks of the LCR within 100 feet of the project site is discussed in Section 4.3.1 above. The primary ecological functions provided by riparian vegetation along the east and west banks of the LCR within 100 feet of the project site include: • Nesting and foraging habitat for birds and small mammals, • Input of terrestrial insects from overhanging vegetation, • Input of allochthonous organic matter (via leaf fall), • Limited erosion control, and • Limited habitat complexity. The LCR is an artificial channel created in 1912 when the river was diverted as a tributary to the former Black River directly to Lake Washington. The LCR is channelized and substantially altered so that there is a minimal riparian area to provide all of the potential ecological functions of an unaltered habitat. Riparian vegetation provides very little, if any, shading the LCR because of the dominance of small shrubs and the lack of large trees. Both banks of the river in the project area are contained within levees and/or flood- control walls, so there is no potential to create meandering or off-channel habitat. Because of the extensive development along both banks of the river in the project area (Boeing to the east and west and the Renton Municipal Airport to the west), there is little, if any, transition between riparian and upland habitats. 4.6 Habitat Alterations and Impacts and Proposed Habitat Management Program The project will not involve any in-water components or work below the OHWM, and no portion of the project will occur in the riparian zone of the LCR. External lighting will be installed as part of the proposed project as described in Section 2.0. The one component of the project that could potentially affect aquatic biota in the LCR is light impingement from the replacement lighting proposed for the aircraft stalls on Aprons A and D. Installation of the new external lighting will meet King County Title 21A.24.010.G to protect public trust as to navigable waters, aquatic resources, fish and wildlife, and their habitat. Specifically, to protect the Habitat Data Narrative Report Aprons A and D Flightline Lighting Upgrade Project Wood Project #PS21204720 | The Boeing Company | July 28, 2021 Page 9 of 10 surrounding environment, external lighting will have shielding options to manipulate cut off angles, diminish excess spill light, trespass light, and glare, preventing the shoreline area from over lighting and disturbing wildlife. In addition, the proposed external lighting fixtures would reduce light trespass to the riparian zone of the LCR. The lighting study modeled the anticipated light conditions along the riparian zone of the LCR to range from 0 to 0.1-foot-candles (see Proposed Comparative Lighting Calculations in Appendix B of the lighting study, provided in Appendix C of this report). No components of the proposed project occurring in the 200-foot shoreline zone will affect existing habitat or ecological conditions within the 200-foot shoreline zone or the adjacent LCR. No habitat management or mitigation programs are required for the proposed project, and none are proposed. 5.0 References Barbour, M.T., Gerritsen, J., Snyder, B.C., and Stribling, J.B., 1999. Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for Use in Streams and Wadeable Rivers. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, EPA 841-B-99-002, Washington, D.C. Corps – see U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Ecology – see Washington State Department of Ecology Kerwin, J., 2001. Salmon and Steelhead Habitat Limiting Factors Report for the Cedar-Sammamish Basin (Water Resource Inventory Area 8). Washington Conservation Commission, Olympia. King County, 2000. Literature Review and Recommended Sampling Protocol for Bull Trout in King County. Final Draft. https://your.kingcounty.gov/dnrp/library/2000/kcr848.pdf (accessed May 26, 2021). ———, 2008. King County Biodiversity Report 2008. King County, Seattle, Washington. http://www.kingcounty.gov/environment/animalsAndPlants/biodiversity/king-county-biodiversity- report.aspx (accessed March 23, 2020). ———, 2016. Herp Species in King County. King County Biodiversity Report 2008. King County, Seattle, Washington. https://www.kingcounty.gov/services/environment/animals-and-plants/biodiversity/defining-biodiversity/species-of-interest/herps.aspx (accessed March 23, 2020). Parametrix and Adolfson Associates, Inc. (Parametrix and Adolfson), 2010. City of Renton Shoreline Master Program Update Restoration Plan. Prepared for the City of Renton, Washington. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.177.6266&rep=rep1&type=pdf (accessed May 19, 2021). Perkins, S.J., 1994. The shrinking Cedar River – Channel changes following flow regime regulation and bank armoring, in Proceedings of Effects of Human-Induced Changes on Hydrologic Systems. American Water Resources Association 1994 Annual Summer Symposium, p. 649-658. Richter, K.O., and Azous, A.L., 1997. Amphibian distribution, abundance, and habitat use, in Azous, A.L., and Horner, R.R. (eds.), Wetlands and Urbanization – Implications for the Future, final report. Puget Sound Wetlands and Stormwater Management Research Program, Washington State Department of Ecology, Olympia, King County Water and Land Resources Division, Seattle, Washington, and University of Washington, Seattle. http://your.kingcounty.gov/dnrp/library/archive-documents/wlr/ wetlands-urbanization-report/wet-rept.pdf (accessed May 26, 2021). U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps), 2004. Cedar River at Renton Flood Damage Reduction Operation and Maintenance Manual – Cedar River Section 205 (Renton, Washington). U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Seattle District, Seattle, Washington. Habitat Data Narrative Report Aprons A and D Flightline Lighting Upgrade Project Wood Project #PS21204720 | The Boeing Company | July 28, 2021 Page 10 of 10 U.S. Forest Service (USFS), 2020. Stream Inventory Handbook: Levels I and II (Version 2.20). USFS, Pacific Northwest Region, Region 6, Portland, Oregon. U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), 2021. USGS Water Monthly Statistics for the Nation – USGS 12119000 Cedar River at Renton. Department of the Interior, USGS, National Water Information System, https://nwis.waterdata.usgs.gov/nwis/monthly?site_no=12119000&por_12119000_149017=1179603,00010,149017,1992-02,2020-10&format=html_table&date_format=YYYY-MM- DD&rdb_compression=file&submitted_form=parameter_selection_list (accessed May 18, 2021). Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology), 2008. Washington State’s 2008 Water Quality Assessment (303[d] & 305[b] Report). Ecology, Olympia, http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/wq/303d/ 2008/index.html (accessed April 15, 2012). ———, 2021. Washington State’s 2008 Water Quality Assessment (303[d] & 305[b] Report). Ecology, Olympia, https://apps.ecology.wa.gov/ApprovedWQA/ApprovedPages/ApprovedSearchResults.aspx (accessed May 19, 2021). Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW), 2021. SalmonScape. 2017. http://apps.wdfw.wa.gov/salmonscape/map.html (accessed May 26, 2021). Weitkamp, D.E., Ruggerone, G.T., Sacha, L., Howell, J., and Bachen, B., 2000. Factors Affecting Chinook Populations – Background Report. City of Seattle, Seattle, Washington. Wydoski, R.S., and Whitney, R.R., 2003. Inland Fishes of Washington. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland, and University of Washington Press, Seattle. Figures ApronsA&D_LightingUpgrade_HabitatNarrativeReport_Figures_20210727.xlsxVICINITY AND SITE MAPS Date: 07/27/2021 Proj. No. PS21204720 Figure 1 Habitat Data Narrative Report Aprons A and D Flightline Lighting Upgrade Project Renton, WA By: tlp ApronsA&D_LightingUpgrade_HabitatNarrativeReport_Figures_20210727.xlsxAERIAL PHOTO OF PROJECT LOCATION (in yellow) Date: 07/27/2021 Proj. No. PS21204720 Figure 2 Habitat Data Narrative Report Aprons A and D Flightline Lighting Upgrade Project By: tlp Apron D Cedar River Trail Apron A Tables Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions, Inc. p:\boeing renton\ps21204720 apron a&d lighting habitat study\03 docctrl\figures_tables\tables_apronsa&d_lighting_upgrade_habitatreport_20210728.docx Page 1 of 1 Table 1: Small Mammals Reported to Occur Along the Lower Cedar River¹ Aprons A and D Flightline Lighting Upgrade Project, Renton, Washington Common name Scientific name (Genus species) Common name Scientific name (Genus species) Creeping vole Microtus oregoni Montane shrew Sorex monticolus Deer mouse Peromyscus maniculatus Shrew-mole Neurotrichus gibbsii Ermine Mustela ermine Southern red-backed vole Clethryonomys gapperi Forest deer mouse Peromyscus oreas Townsend’s chipmunk Tamias townsendii Long-tailed vole Microtus longicaudus Trowbridge’s shrew Sorex trowbridgei Marsh shrew Sorex bendirei Vagrant shrew Sorex vagrans Masked shrew Sorex cinereus Note(s) 1. Source: Richter and Azous, 1997. Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions, Inc. p:\boeing renton\ps21204720 apron a&d lighting habitat study\03 docctrl\figures_tables\tables_apronsa&d_lighting_upgrade_habitatreport_20210728.docx Page 1 of 1 Table 2: Birds Reported to Occur Along the Lower Cedar River1 Aprons A and D Flightline Lighting Upgrade Project, Renton, Washington Common name Scientific name (Genus species) Common name Scientific name (Genus species) American crow Corvus brachyrhynchos Northern pygmy owl Glaucidium gnoma American goldfinch Carduelis tristis Orange-crowned warbler Vermivora celata American robin Turdus migratorius Pine siskin Carduelis pinus Black-capped chickadee Parus atricapillus Pacific-slope flycatcher Empidonax difficilis Belted kingfisher Ceryle alcyon Purple finch Carpodacus purpureus Bewick’s wren Thryomanes bewickii Red-breasted nuthatch Sitta Canadensis Brown-headed cow bird Molothrus ater Red-breasted sapsucker Sphyrapicus ruber Black-headed grosbeak Pheucticus melanocephalus Red crossbill Loxia curvirostra Brewer’s blackbird Euphagus cyanocephalus Red-eyed vireo Vireo olivaceus Brown creeper Certhia Americana Rufous-sided towhee Pipilo erythrophthalmus Black-throated gray warbler Dendroica nigrescens Ruffed grouse Bonasa umbellus Bushtit Psaltriparus minimus Ruby-crowned kinglet Regulus calendula Chestnut-backed chickadee Parus rufescens Red-winged blackbird Agelaius phoeniceus Cedar waxwing Bombycilla cedrorum Sora Porzana Carolina Cooper’s hawk Accipiter cooperii Song sparrow Melospiza melodia Common raven Corvus corax Sharp-shinned hawk Accipiter striatus Common yellow throat Geothlypis trichas Steller’s jay Cyanocitta stelleri Dark-eyed junco Junco hyemalis Swainson’s thrush Catharus ustulatus Downy woodpecker Picoides pubescens Townsend’s warbler Setophaga townsendi European starling Sturnus vulgaris Vaux’s swift Chaetura vauxi Evening grosbeak Coccothraustes vespertinus Violet-green swallow Tachycineta thalassina Fox sparrow Passerella iliaca Virginia rail Rallus limicola Great blue heron Ardea herodias Warbling vireo Vireo gilvus Golden-crowned kinglet Regulus satrapa Western tanager Piranga ludoviciana Hairy woodpecker Picoides villosus Willow flycatcher Empidonax traillii Hermit thrush Catharus guttatus Wilson’s warbler Cardellina pusilla Marsh wren Cistothorus palustris Winter wren Troglodytes hiemalis MacGillivray’s warbler Geothlypis tolmiei Wood duck Aix sponsa Northern flicker Colaptes auratus Yellow warbler Dendroica petechia Note(s) 1. Source: Richter and Azous, 1997. Table lists only species reported by Richter and Azous (1997). Other species have been observed during other investigations and during the field visit on July 22, 2021. Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions, Inc. p:\boeing renton\ps21204720 apron a&d lighting habitat study\03 docctrl\figures_tables\tables_apronsa&d_lighting_upgrade_habitatreport_20210728.docx Page 1 of 1 Table 3: Non-Native Fish Species Introduced Into the Lake Washington/Lake Union System¹ Aprons A and D Flightline Lighting Upgrade Project, Renton, Washington Common name Scientific name (Genus species) Status American shad Alosa sapidissima Uncommon strays Atlantic salmon Salmo salar Can exceed 1,000 per year Black bullhead Ictalurus melas Extinct Black crappie Pomoxis nigromaculatus Common Bluegill Lepomis macrocheilus Common Brook trout Salvelinus fontinalis Rarely caught Brown bullhead Ictalurus nebulosus Rare, may be extinct Brown trout Salmo trutta No observed reproduction Channel catfish Ictalurus punctatus Rarely caught Cherry salmon Oncorhynchus masou Extinct Common carp Cyprinus carpio Abundant Fathead minnow Pimephales notatus Unknown Goldfish Carassius auratus Intermittent Grass carp Ctenopharengodon idella Triploids only Lake trout Salvelinus namaycush Extinct Lake whitefish Coregonus clupeaformis Extinct Largemouth bass Micropterus salmoides Common Pumpkinseed sunfish Lepomis gibbosus Abundant Smallmouth bass Micropterus dolomieui Common Tench Tinca tinca Abundant Warmouth Lepomis gulosus No observed reproduction Weather loach Misgurnus angillicaudatus No observed reproduction White crappie Pomoxis annularis Uncommon Yellow perch Perca flavescens Abundant Note(s) 1. Source: Kerwin, 2001. Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions, Inc. p:\boeing renton\ps21204720 apron a&d lighting habitat study\03 docctrl\figures_tables\tables_apronsa&d_lighting_upgrade_habitatreport_20210728.docx Page 1 of 1 Table 4: Different Aquatic Life Uses and Their Associated Numeric Temperature Criteria¹ Aprons A and D Flightline Lighting Upgrade Project, Renton, Washington Beneficial use Temperature2 (°C) Char Spawning and Rearing 12 Core Summer Salmonid Habitat 16 Salmonid Spawning, Rearing, and Migration 17.5 Salmonid Rearing and Migration Only 17.5 Note(s) 1. Source: Ecology, 2008. 2. Based on the 7-day average of the daily maximum temperatures. Abbreviation(s) °C = degrees Celsius Appendix A Aprons A and D Lighting Improvements Plan Sheets BOEING COMMERCIAL AIRPLANE GROUP RENTON FACILITY N 8TH AND PARK AVE NORTH RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 VICINITY PLAN RENTON AIRPORT APRON 'A' & 'D' COVER SHEET G1 600 Stewart St., Ste 1400 Seattle, Washington 98101 Tel 206.267.1700 Fax 206.267.1701 SAZAN #543-1891 ISSUE FOR CONSTRUCTION 12.21.18 APRON 'A' AND 'D' FLIGHTLINE LIGHTING UPGRADE 12/20/2018 G1 RAMP PAVEDPAVEDPAVED PAVED PARKINGROCKSROCKSPAVEDPAVEDPAVED PAVED PARKING AIRPORTPROPERTY PAVEDPAVEDPAVED PAVED APRON "D"WETLANDS BUFFER40'WETLANDS BUFFERTHIS PROJECT311'88'40'100'200'200'100'APRON "A"100' SHORELINE SETBACK200' SHORELINE SETBACK100' SHORELINE SETBACK200' SHORELINE SETBACKBUILDING APRON A and DSITE PLANYD4 RENTON AIRPORT APRON 'A' YARD LIGHTING REMOVAL YDE8aR 600 Stewart St., Ste 1400 Seattle, Washington 98101 Tel 206.267.1700 Fax 206.267.1701 SAZAN #543-1891 ISSUE FOR CONSTRUCTION 12.21.18 E8c E8b E8a E8d REMOVAL E1 12/20/2018 600 Stewart St., Ste 1400 Seattle, Washington 98101 Tel 206.267.1700 Fax 206.267.1701 SAZAN #543-1891 ISSUE FOR CONSTRUCTION 12.21.18 RENTON AIRPORT APRON 'A' YARD LIGHTING REMOVAL YDE8bR E8c E8b E8a E8d REMOVAL E2 12/20/2018 E8c E8b E8a 600 Stewart St., Ste 1400 Seattle, Washington 98101 Tel 206.267.1700 Fax 206.267.1701 SAZAN #543-1891 ISSUE FOR CONSTRUCTION 12.21.18 RENTON AIRPORT APRON 'A' YARD LIGHTING REMOVAL YDE8cR E8d REMOVAL E3 12/20/2018 E8c E8b E8a 600 Stewart St., Ste 1400 Seattle, Washington 98101 Tel 206.267.1700 Fax 206.267.1701 SAZAN #543-1891 ISSUE FOR CONSTRUCTION 12.21.18 RENTON AIRPORT APRON 'D' YARD LIGHTING REMOVAL YDE8dR E8d REMOVAL E4 12/20/2018 RENTON AIRPORT APRON 'A' YARD LIGHTING YDE8a 600 Stewart St., Ste 1400 Seattle, Washington 98101 Tel 206.267.1700 Fax 206.267.1701 SAZAN #543-1891 ISSUE FOR CONSTRUCTION 12.21.18 E8c E8b E8a E8d E5 12/20/2018 600 Stewart St., Ste 1400 Seattle, Washington 98101 Tel 206.267.1700 Fax 206.267.1701 SAZAN #543-1891 ISSUE FOR CONSTRUCTION 12.21.18 RENTON AIRPORT APRON 'A' YARD LIGHTING YDE8b E8c E8b E8a E8d E6 12/20/2018 E8c 600 Stewart St., Ste 1400 Seattle, Washington 98101 Tel 206.267.1700 Fax 206.267.1701 SAZAN #543-1891 ISSUE FOR CONSTRUCTION 12.21.18 RENTON AIRPORT APRON 'A' YARD LIGHTING YDE8c E8b E8a E8d E7 12/20/2018 E8c E8b E8a 600 Stewart St., Ste 1400 Seattle, Washington 98101 Tel 206.267.1700 Fax 206.267.1701 SAZAN #543-1891 ISSUE FOR CONSTRUCTION 12.21.18 RENTON AIRPORT APRON 'D' YARD LIGHTING YDE8d E8d E8 12/20/2018 RENTON AIRPORT APRON 'A' & 'D' APRON A & D POLE SCHEDULE E530-1 600 Stewart St., Ste 1400 Seattle, Washington 98101 Tel 206.267.1700 Fax 206.267.1701 SAZAN #543-1891 ISSUE FOR CONSTRUCTION 12.21.18 E13 12/20/2018 RENTON AIRPORT APRON 'A' & 'D' APRON A & D LIGHTING DETAIL E530-2 600 Stewart St., Ste 1400 Seattle, Washington 98101 Tel 206.267.1700 Fax 206.267.1701 SAZAN #543-1891 ISSUE FOR CONSTRUCTION 12.21.18 E14 12/20/2018 Appendix B Site Photographic Log Habitat Data Narrative Report Aprons A and D Flightline Lighting Upgrade Project Wood Project #PS21204720 | The Boeing Company | July 28, 2020 Page 1 of 4 Appendix B: Aprons A and D Flightline Lighting Upgrade Project Photo Log Photo 1 Northern end of the project site (Apron A) looking toward the north along the east bank of Lower Cedar River– Himalayan blackberry and willow. Photo 2 Approximately the midway point of the project site (Apron A) looking toward the north of along the east bank of the Lower Cedar River – Himalayan blackberry, canary reed grass, willow, and alder. Habitat Data Narrative Report Aprons A and D Flightline Lighting Upgrade Project Wood Project #PS21204720 | The Boeing Company | July 28, 2020 Page 2 of 4 Photo 3 Looking toward the south of the project site (Apron A) along the east bank Lower Cedar River – sword ferns, nootka rose, willow, and dogwood. Photo 4 Looking toward the north of the project site (Apron D) along the fence line and trail – unidentified turf grass, red maple, Douglas fir, and Japanese privet. Habitat Data Narrative Report Aprons A and D Flightline Lighting Upgrade Project Wood Project #PS21204720 | The Boeing Company | July 28, 2020 Page 3 of 4 Photo 5 Looking toward the south of the project site (Apron D) along the fence line and trail – unidentified turf grass, red maple, Douglas fir, and alder. Photo 6 Approximately the middle of the project site (Apron D) looking south along the east bank of the Lower Cedar River and the trail – Himalayan blackberry, unidentified turf grass, willow, red maple, and horsetail. Habitat Data Narrative Report Aprons A and D Flightline Lighting Upgrade Project Wood Project #PS21204720 | The Boeing Company | July 28, 2020 Page 4 of 4 Photo 7 Southern end of the project site (Apron D) looking south along the east bank of the Lower Cedar River and the trail – Himalayan blackberry, Douglas fir, willow, and horsetail. Appendix C Lighting Criteria Study Boeing Apron A and Apron D Lighting Criteria Study July 30, 2021 Prepared for: The Boeing Company Page 2 Flight Line Apron A & D Lighting Study – Boeing Renton Table of Contents General – Project Description and Scope of Work ....................................................................................... 2 Applicable Codes ........................................................................................................................................... 2 Existing Conditions ........................................................................................................................................ 3 User Survey ................................................................................................................................................... 3 Recommendations ........................................................................................................................................ 4 Study Findings and Summary ........................................................................................................................ 4 Appendices .................................................................................................................................................... 6 Appendix A. Existing Light Levels ..................................................................................................... 7 Appendix B. Existing Conditions and Recommended Corrective Actions……………………………………..8 Appendix C. Product Cutsheets ..................................................................................................... 11 General – Project Description and Scope of Work The Sazan Group is performing a lighting study of Boeing Flight Line Aprons A and D in Renton, WA. The study will examine options to remove and replace the existing High-Pressure Sodium flood lights with energy efficient LED light fixtures. In addition, the Boeing study criteria will reuse the existing poles, power, and minimizing the overall number of fixtures, while creating higher light levels. For the study, we performed a site visit and reviewed existing light levels, layout, fixture types, quantity, and had feedback from flight line staff regarding the function of the lighting related to the day to day work they perform. In this report, we have concluded by recommending LED fixtures to fulfill Boeing’s requirements including higher illumination levels with fewer luminaires. We have also performed the necessary photometric calculations ensuring that the new layout will meet the recommended lighting levels, as well as avoiding impact to the shoreline of the Lower Cedar River with light trespass. The report will include two new light fixture selections and a ROM cost summary. Soil and Drainage No new ground disturbance will be involved and no new buildings or facilities are being constructed: Soil conditions and drainage have not been evaluated. The project will occur on paved, impermeable surfaces and will not create additional impermeable surface area. No concrete cutting or paving activities will be performed. No construction activities will occur, and no structures will be placed below the ordinary high water mark of the lower Cedar River. Project activities are located within 200 feet of the shoreline of the Lower Cedar River, which in this river segment is an artificial channel and is constrained between levees and revetments. Page 3 Flight Line Apron A & D Lighting Study – Boeing Renton Applicable Codes Renton City Code refers to King County Title 21A.24.010.G for protecting the public trust as to navigable waters, aquatic resources, and fish and wildlife and their habitat. FAA AC150/5300-13 determines areas of concerns for lighting flight line, cargo, and maintenance Aprons IES RP-37-15 Recommended Practices: Outdoor Lighting for Airport Environments states that a minimum of 2 FC is necessary for Flight Line Apron. Their recommendations is lower than Boeing’s lighting request and requirements. Existing Conditions Existing Stall Light Level: See Appendix A for site visit photometric readings. Generally, stalls have illumination within 10-18 footcandles (FC). There are measurements of less than 10 FC mainly along the inner perimeter of the stalls. Existing Pole Layout: Typical pole layout for stalls in Apron A is (2) 23’ poles at the front and rear of the stall and (2) 15’ poles at the middle of the stall. Each pole is between two stalls and houses fixtures for either stall. The front and middle poles have (2) 400W fixtures and (2) 1000W fixtures per stall, and the rear poles have (2) 400W fixtures and (3) 1000W fixtures. The typical pole layout for Apron D stalls match Apron A, minus the middle poles. Apron D stalls are smaller than A Stalls. Existing Luminaire Layout: Current luminaires for both Apron A & Apron D are 400W and 1000W High Pressure Sodium fixtures. The fixtures are on aimable mounts that allow for adjustments in rotation and tilt. Most fixtures are aimed toward the nearest Airplane stall; however, some have been adjusted to illuminate the site. A single pole at the drive entrance to Apron D is not aimed to illuminate any airline stall but lights the roadway instead. This pole creates the highest level of light trespass to the pedestrian park and the Cedar River. Existing Lighting Controls: Apron D Stall lights are controlled at a single location with a 3 options switch, On, Off, and Auto. The front and rear poles for the typical Apron A stall are controlled at a single location and the middle poles have their individual controls. All poles were set to Auto during the two site visits. Auto turns all luminaires on the pole On at Dusk. User Survey During the nighttime site visit we spoke to Wayne, a Boeing Flight line inspector and crew lead for Stall D6. Wayne noted that the LED upgrade would be beneficial to the work being done, and that higher light levels would be beneficial to their work. For certain inspection areas, there are task or personal lights they use, however, they rely on the pole area lighting for most tasks and for general safety. Wayne mentioned a few specific stalls with lighting issues. Page 4 Flight Line Apron A & D Lighting Study – Boeing Renton First, the poles at stalls D3 and D4 have fixtures that flicker on and off, which can be disruptive to work. Even and consistent illumination is important. Second, Wayne mentioned Stalls 9-10 have uncomfortable glare when inspecting inside the cockpit. Field measurements confirm that the luminaires at these stalls were producing a significantly higher light level, with the brightest point on Stall A-10 at 100 FC. The intensity of the lighting from a couple of these poles versus the generally uniform lighting of the other stalls produce noticeable glare while working at the stall or in the surrounding area. These luminaires were also mounted on smaller 15’ poles unlike the typical 20’+ poles and the luminaires were aimed directly into the pilot’s seat for inspection. Recommendations For effective and efficient lighting of Apron A and D stall lighting there are multiple factors we considered: For maintaining a low level of light on the Lower Cedar River bank we recommend a LED lamp color temperature of 3000K and a CRI of over 85. The LED lamp allows the lighting quality to be a warmer white and still allow for the necessary light quantity and requested footcandles for the maintenance work to be accomplished. The replacement fixtures need to have proper optics for aiming and tilting to focus the lighting in the apron area. The selected fixtures allow for accurate adjustment to evenly illuminate the area for the crew’s needs while the cut off guards diminish night light pollution. It is important to have shielding options to manipulate cut off angles and diminish excess spill light, trespass light, and glare to surrounding areas. Specifically, the cut off shields are needed to accommodate both Boeing and local community concerns of over lighting the shoreline area and disturbing wildlife. The level of maintenance demands an even illumination on both horizontal and vertical surfaces while minimizing shadows for the work area. The proposed light fixtures fulfill these needs. See Appendix B. comparative calculations for more exact information. Also see the Existing conditions and User survey sections for current conditions. As with any installation an ease of long term maintenance, warranty and control are essential. Both recommended luminaires have a 5-year warranty and a minimum outdoor rating of IP65. Footcandle requirement per Boeing is minimum of 10 FC of uniform light, without shadowing, hot spots, or glare. The suggested replacement light fixtures satisfy the BUG rating, accomplish the concerns above which relate directly to IES RP-37-15 Recommended Practices: Outdoor Lighting for Airport Environments, and both are DLC qualified. Study Findings and Summary We studied two separate LED manufacturers that fulfill all our recommended practices. Our proposed layout reduces the number of LED fixtures per front pole to- 2 lower lumen fixtures per stall or 4- Page 5 Flight Line Apron A & D Lighting Study – Boeing Renton fixtures per pole and for rear plane poles 2- lower lumen fixtures and a single higher lumen fixture. Refer to Appendix B for photometric comparison calculations. The final page of Appendix B shows Apron A Stalls A-9 and A-10 where the light trespass into the Cedar river is of most concern. Using LED fixtures with narrow distribution and sharp cutoff allows the pole lights to be aimable where needed without obtrusive light spillage. Much of the intrusive light to the Cedar River is due to the current fixture’s lack of proper shielding. The two fixtures studied were the Meteor “BTS” Series and the Beacon “MA-F” series. Refer to Appendix C for product cutsheets. Study Findings and Summary continued Our recommendation is to replace the existing High-Pressure Sodium fixtures for the Meteor LED Bolt “BTS” Series floodlight The Meteor Fixture features a die-cast aluminum housing with a tempered glass lens. It has a nominal 9”X15” LED Light producing board and delivers 38,339 lumens using 280 watts, or 137 lumens per watt. The tempered glass lens can come in multiple beam distributions and there are multiple options for 3- sided glare shielding. This fixture is DLC Listed, UL Wet location listed and has an IP68 outdoor rating. The Beacon Matrix fixture is a die-cast aluminum construction with glass enclosed LED optics. It has two LED boards and nominal overall dimensions of 25”X30”. This fixture delivers 32,891 lumens using 330 watts, or 97 lumens per watt. Multiple beam distributions and glare reduction shields are available. This fixture is DLC Listed, UL Wet location listed and has an IP65 outdoor rating. The photometric calculations for this fixture meet the criteria standards but do not perform as effectively as the Meteor fixture. For the front poles at stalls in Apron D, 3 fixtures would be required over the 2 fixtures for the Meteor option. The advantage of replacing the existing high pressure sodium lighting fixtures with new Meteor high performance LED lighting fixtures is improved color rendering, reduced glare, and lighting fixture adjustability. Improved color rendering will enhance worker performance and reduce eye strain and fatigue. The light fixture shielding is expected to reduce light trespass and glare to adjacent properties alleviating possible neighbor complaints. The glare to workers will be diminished by cut off shields on the lighting fixture. The requested illumination levels in the stalls will be maintained while reducing light trespass on the public shoreline to a minimum footcandle level of 0.0 reducing impact on fish and wildlife and enhancing habitat. Energy consumption of the new lighting system is expected to be reduced by over 75%. The improved optics of the new LED lighting fixtures will improve illumination levels and uniformity compared to the existing high pressure sodium lighting system. Appendices Appendix A: Existing Lighting Conditions 8.6 11.6 8.9 10.8 12.4 5.6 2.2 1.4 15.6 7.6 17.2 11.2 8.1 4.3 16.3 15.4 16.110.8 12.014.7 Apron D Stall D6 Light Meter Survey Calculation taken at 9:30pm on 09/06/18 Clear sky Units measured in Footcandles (FC) Appendix B: Proposed Comparative Lighting Calculation Apron D Stalls D6 & D7 Stall D6 fixtures - Meteor “BTS” Series Stall D7 fixtures - Beacon “MA-F” Series Units measured in Footcandles (FC) Appendix B: Proposed Comparative Lighting Calculation Apron A Stalls A-3 & A-4 Stall A-3 fixtures - Meteor “BTS” Series Stall A-4 fixtures - Beacon “MA-F” Series Units measured in Footcandles (FC) Appendix B: Proposed Comparative Lighting Calculation Apron A Stalls A-9 & A-10 Ceder River Light Trespass Stall A-9 fixtures - Meteor “BTS” Series Stall A-10 fixtures - Beacon “MA-F” Series Units measured in Footcandles (FC) Electrical System Specification METEOR LIGHTING P: 213.255.2060 F: 213.596.3704 www.meteor-lighting.com *METEOR LIGHTING reserves the right to make changes to this product at any time without prior notice and such modification shall be effective immediately. 2018 V1.1 | Page 1 of 6 Bolt Series - Outdoor/Natatorium ADVANCED HIGH CEILING - 15746lm (150W) 30182lm (220W) 38339lm (280W) 60509lm (440W) 75168lm (560W) - Power Input: Universal (120-277V); HVT (347-480V) - Operating Temperature: -40°F~104°F - Surge Protection: 10KV LED Technology EPA - 3000K, 4000K, 5000K - 85 CRI, 75 CRI - Beam Angle: 15°, 30°, 60° , 80° and 100° (with diffuser) - Rated Life > 60,000 Hours (L70) Advanced Dimming - Standard 0-10V: <10% METEOR’s proprietary VX Driver combats flickering in recorded materials. Compatible with all dimming options. Project Type Note Quantity - BTS-150 / BTS-220 / BTS-280: 1.28 ft2 - BTS-440 / BTS-560: 2.37 ft2 Warranty Listing - 5 year limited warranty - UL Wet Location Listed, IP65 Outdoor Rating - DLC Listed - FCC - CE Housing - Dimensions: 8.67” (220mm) x 14.96” (380mm) x 5.79” (147mm) - Material: Die-Cast Aluminum, Tempered Glass - Weight: 9.26lbs (BTS-150) / 17.64lbs (BTS-220) / 18.52lbs (BTS-280) / 48.5lbs (BTS-440/560) Mounting - Bracket (stainless steel) IP65 High lumen compact modular luminaire with lumen output 15746 – 75168lm suited for sporting facilities. - Outdoor/Natatorium Rating Special coating, sealant, and wiring is applied for long term operation in harsh environments. (Proprietary VX Driver is incorporated to all dimming options for video flicker-free lighting) DesignLights Consortium™ Qualied Luminaires: BTS-150-CC7-UNV, BTS-220-CC7-UNV, BTS-280-CC7-UNV, BTS-560-50K Standard version available, please refer to Standard spec sheet for more details. How To Specify: BTS Bolt Series Model 150 150W 220 220W 280 280W 440 440W 560 560W Wattage BLK Black WHT White Finish UNV 120V-277V HVT 347-480V Voltage 15 15º 30 30º 60 60º 80 80º WD* 100º (with diffuser) Beam Angle 308 3000K / CRI85 408 4000K / CRI85 507 5000K / CRI75 CCT / CRI STV Standard 0-10V <10% Dimming Ordering Example: BTS-560-507-UNV-STV-15-BLK-BRK-WG BTS Specification METEOR LIGHTING P: 213.255.2060 F: 213.596.3704 www.meteor-lighting.com *METEOR LIGHTING reserves the right to make changes to this product at any time without prior notice and such modification shall be effective immediately. 2018 V1.1 | Page 2 of 6 Bolt Series - Outdoor/Natatorium ADVANCED HIGH CEILING Accessories Rating WG GSB GSV DF* SLP OUT1 NAT2 Wire Guard Glare Shield Baffle Glare Shield Visor Diffuser Slipfitter Outing Rating Natatorium Rating Mounting BRK Bracket 4-5 weeks lead time on over 75% of specifications. 1 Outdoor rating: Coating and wiring will be changed to high UV resistant and corrosion resistant materials for long term operation in outdoor environments. 2 Natatorium rating: Coating and sealant will be changed to high corrosion resistant materials to prevent damage from long term exposure to chlorine vapors. *Please factor in change in lumen output with diffuser. (-20% with 100°; -12% with other degrees) BTS-150-CC7-UNV (Bolt-150W-5000K-UNV) BTS-560-50K (Bolt-560W-5000K) (Bolt-220W-5000K-UNV)(Bolt-280W-5000K-UNV)BTS-220-CC7-UNV BTS-280-CC7-UNV DesignLights Consortium™ Qualified Luminaires: * Please factor in change in lumen output with diffuser. (-20% with 100°; -12% with other degrees) Delivered Lumens* Specification METEOR LIGHTING P: 213.255.2060 F: 213.596.3704 www.meteor-lighting.com *METEOR LIGHTING reserves the right to make changes to this product at any time without prior notice and such modification shall be effective immediately. 2018 V1.1 | Page 3 of 6 Bolt Series - Outdoor/Natatorium ADVANCED HIGH CEILING Current Consumption 120V 277V 150W 1.50A 0.64A 1.01A 1.29A 2.02A 2.58A 2.44A 3.08A 4.88A 6.16A 220W 280W 440W 560W 24354 lm15746 lm 31939 lm 48734 lm 28389 lm17002 lm 35880 lm 56731 lm 30182 lm18051 lm 38339 lm 60509 lm 76486 lm 71888 lm 63766 lm CCT 3000K 5000K 280W220W150W 440W 560W 4000K *Tolerance±8% Beam Angle: 15° Wattage Wattage Volt 150W / 220W / 280W 8.7” 18.26” 10.6” 3.9”Ø1.07”Ø7.87” 0.87” 0.4” 3.03” 7.87” Specification METEOR LIGHTING P: 213.255.2060 F: 213.596.3704 www.meteor-lighting.com *METEOR LIGHTING reserves the right to make changes to this product at any time without prior notice and such modification shall be effective immediately. 2018 V1.1 | Page 4 of 6 Bolt Series - Outdoor/Natatorium ADVANCED HIGH CEILING Dimensions Specification METEOR LIGHTING P: 213.255.2060 F: 213.596.3704 www.meteor-lighting.com *METEOR LIGHTING reserves the right to make changes to this product at any time without prior notice and such modification shall be effective immediately. 2018 V1.1 | Page 5 of 6 Bolt Series - Outdoor/Natatorium ADVANCED HIGH CEILING Dimensions 440W / 560W 90º 1.07” 0.41” 30º 30º2.8” 10.78” 9.13” 18.74” 11.41” 9.84” 3.14” 4.72” 17.91” 7.87” 0.55” Stainless Steel Specification METEOR LIGHTING P: 213.255.2060 F: 213.596.3704 www.meteor-lighting.com *METEOR LIGHTING reserves the right to make changes to this product at any time without prior notice and such modification shall be effective immediately. 2018 V1.1 | Page 6 of 6 Bolt Series - Outdoor/Natatorium ADVANCED HIGH CEILING Accessory Glare Shield Baffle Glare Shield Visor Wire Guard Slipfitter 3 ¼” ¼” 4 ½” ½” 4” ∅1 ∅3 Tenon slipfitter; fits 2-3/8" to 2-7/8" OD tenon. 5.3” 5.3”5.3” 1’- 5¼” 1’- 4¼” MATRIX FLOODLIGHT CERTIFICATIONS/LISTINGS PRODUCT IMAGE(S)SPECIFICATIONS Beacon Products • 2041 58th Avenue Circle East Bradenton, FL 34203 • Phone: 800-345-4928 Due to our continued efforts to improve our products, product specifications are subject to change without notice. © 2018 BEACON PRODUCTS, All Rights Reserved • For more information visit our website: www.beaconproducts.com • Printed in USA August 8, 2018 7:43 AM Cat.# Approvals Job Type DIMENSIONS 29.7 31.20 25.0 25.00 26.25 4.0 13.2 34.5 Model Mount Weight lbs. Weight kgs.EPA, Sq. ft. Flood Knuckle, 0˚ Knuckle, 30˚ 86.0 39.1 1.7 3.8 Intended Use: The Beacon Matrix luminaire is available in three configurations with a wide choice of different LED wattage configurations and optical distributions designed to replace HID lighting up to 1000W MH or HPS. Luminaires are suitable for wet locations. Construction: • Manufactured with die cast aluminum. • Coated with a polyester finish that meets ASTM B117 corrosion test requirements and ASTM D522 cracking and loss of adhesion test requirements. • External hardware is corrosion resistant. • One piece optical cartridge system consisting of an LED engine, LED lamps, optics, gasket and stainless steel bezel. • Cartridge can be field replaced as a one piece optical system. • Silicone gasket ensures a weather-proof seal around each individual optic. • Glass enclosed optics enable high angle aiming. Electrical: • Luminaire accepts 100V through 277V, 50 Hz to 60 Hz (UNV), 347V, or 480V input. • Power factor is ≥ .90 at full load. • Dimming drivers are standard, but must contact factory to request wiring leads for purpose of external dimming controls. • Component-to-component wiring within the luminaire may carry no more than 80% of rated load and is certified by UL for use at 600VAC at 90°C or higher. • Fixture electrical compartment shall contain all LED driver components and optional push-button terminal block for AC power connections. • Ambient operating temperature -40°C to 40°C • Surge protection - 20kA. ANSI/IEEE category C high Controls/Options: • Available with an optional passive infrared (PIR) motion sensor capable of detecting motion 360° around the luminaire. When no motion is detected for the specified time, the motion response system reduces the wattage to factory preset level, reducing the light level accordingly. When motion is detected by the PIR sensor, the luminaire returns to full wattage and full light output. Please contact Beacon Products if project requirements vary from standard configuration. • Available with Energeni for optional set dimming, timed dimming with simple delay, or timed dimming based on time of night (see www.beaconproducts.com/products/energeni). • In addition, Matrix can be specified with SiteSync™ wireless control system for reduction in energy and maintenance costs while optimizing light quality 24/7. For more details, see ordering information or visit: www.hubbelllighting.com/sitesync Installation: • Adjustable knuckle and post top mount designed to slip fit a 2” tenon that is 2 3/8” OD by 4” in length. • Knuckle mount luminaire can adjust in 5˚ increments. Finish: • IFS polyester powder-coat electrostatically applied and thermocured. IFS finish consists of a five stage pretreatment regimen with a polymer primer sealer and top coated with a thermoset super TGIC polyester powder coat finish. • The finish meets the AAMA 2604 performance specification which includes passing a 3000 hour salt spray test for corrosion resistance and resists cracking or loss of adhesion per ASTM D522 and resists surface impacts of up to 160 inch-pounds. Certifications/Ratings: • DesignLights Consortium (DLC) qualified, consult DLC website for more details: http://www.designlights.org/QPL • Certified to UL 1598, UL 8750, and CSA C22.2 No. 250.0 • 1.5G rated for ANSI C136.31 • IP66 optical assembly • IDA approved Warranty: Five year limited warranty for more information visit: www.hubbelllighting.com/resources/warranty IP65 Knuckle Yoke 5.09 Sensors, photocells and wireless controls should not be tilted above horizontal. Beacon Products • 2041 58th Avenue Circle East Bradenton, FL 34203 • Phone: 800-345-4928 Due to our continued efforts to improve our products, product specifications are subject to change without notice. © 2018 BEACON PRODUCTS, All Rights Reserved • For more information visit our website: www.beaconproducts.com • Printed in USA AuGuST 8, 2018 7:43 AM ORDERING INFORMATION ORDERING EXAMPLE: MAF/196L-610/5K7/N/UNV/K/DB PRECOMMISSIONED SITESYNC ORDERING INFORMATION: When ordering a fixture with the SiteSync lighting control option, additional information will be required to complete the order. The SiteSync Commissioning Form or alternate schedule information must be completed. This form includes Project location, Group information, and Operating schedules. For more detailed information please visit www.hubbell-automation.com/products/sitesync/ or contact Hubbell Lighting tech support at (800) 345-4928. SiteSync fixtures with Motion control (SWPM) require the mounting height of the fixture for selection of the lens. Examples: MAF/196L-610/5K7/N/UNV/K/DB/SWP SiteSync only MAF/196L-610/5K7/N/UNV/K/DB/SWPM/40F SiteSync with Motion Control MA/F SERIES MA/F Matrix ENGINE 104L-265 265W, 30,000 lm 104L-300 300W, 33,000 lm 104L-330 330W, 35,000 lm 148L-380 380W, 42,000 lm 148L-425 425W, 46,000 lm 148L-470 470W, 50,000 lm 192L-490 490W, 55,000 lm 192L-550 550W, 60,000 lm 192L-610 610W, 65,000 lm VOLTAGE UNV 120- 277V 347 347V 480 480V CCT/CRI6 5K7 5000K, 70 CRI 4K7 4000K, 70 CRI 3K7 3000K, 70 CRI DISTRIBUTION N 2x2 Flood M 4x4 Flood W 6x6 Flood TC6 Tennis Court 4W6 Type 4 Wide 5QN6 Type 5 Square Narrow COLOR DB Dark Bronze Textured BL Black Textured WH White Textured PS Plat. Silver Smooth GYS Light Gray Smooth GT Graphite Textured TT Titanium Textured CC Custom Color MOUNTING K Knuckle (5o adjustable fitter) Y Yoke ASQ Arm Square A2 Arm mount for 2.4”-3.0” OD round Pole A3 Arm mount for 3.1”-4.0” OD round Pole A4 Arm mount for 4.1”-5.0” OD round Pole A5 Arm mount for 5.1”-6.0” OD round Pole Accessories and Services (Ordered Separately) 1 Not available with other sensor or wireless control options. 2 Specify routine setting code (example GENI-04). See ENERGENI brochure and instructions for setting table options. 3 Photocell included with sensor, additional photocontrol not recommended. 4 Order at least one SCPREMOTE per project location to program and control the occupancy sensor. 5 Specify group and zone at time of order. See www.hubbell-automation.com/products/sitesync/ for more details. Order at least one SiteSync interface Accessory SWUSB or SWTAB. Each option contains SiteSync License, GUI, and Bridge Node. 6 Does not include glass lens. Limit to 30o tilt 7 Shorting cap, phot control, or wireless control provided by others CONTROL OPTIONS 7PR7 7-PIN Receptacle only 7PR-TL 7-PIN Receptacle w/ Twist Lock photo control 7PR-SC 7-PIN Receptacle w/ Shorting Cap 2PF 2 power feed with 2 drivers GENI1,2 Energeni PC1 Button Photocell SCP/40F1,3,4 Programmable Line Voltage sensor SWP1,5 SiteSync Pre-Commission SWPM/40F1,5 SiteSync Pre-Commission w/Sensor OPTIONS FL Louver SF120 120V Fuse SF277 277V Fuse SF347 347V Fuse DF208 208V Fuse DF240 240V Fuse DF480 480V Fuse Control Accessories SWUSB*SiteSync interface software loaded on USB flash drive for use with owner supplied PC (Windows based only). Includes SiteSync license, software and USB radio bridge node. SWTAB*Windows tablet and SiteSync interface software. Includes tablet with preloaded software, SiteSync license and USB radio bridge node SWBRG+SiteSync USB radio bridge node only. Order if a replace- ment is required or if an extra bridge node is requested. SCPREMOTE Order at least one per project location to program and control SW7PR+SiteSync 7 Pin on fixture module On/Off/Dim, Daylight Sensor 120-480VACAccessories MAF-FL Louver (Set of two) MAF-FV-XX Visor (Set of two) MAF-FVY-XX Yoke Visor (Set of two) * When ordering SiteSync at least one of these two interface options must be ordered per project. + Available as a SiteSync retrofit solution for fixtures with an existing 7pin receptacle. Accessories and Services (Ordered Separately) Catalog Number Description HCS System NXOFM-1R1D-UNV On-fixture Module (7-pin), On / Off / Dim, Daylight Sensor with HubbNET Ra- dio and Bluetooth® Radio, 120-480VAC NX Distributed Intelligence™ WIR-RME-L On-fixture Module (7-pin or 5-pin), On / Off / Dim, Daylight Sensor with wiSCAPE Radio, 110-480VAC wiSCAPE® Lighting Control For additional information related to these accessories please visit www.hubbellcontrolsolutions.com. Options provided for use with integrated sensor, please view specification sheet ordering information table for details. Hubbell Control Solutions - Accessories (sold separately) SiteSync 7-Pin Module • SiteSync features in a new form • Available as an accessory for new construction or retrofit applications (with existing 7-Pin receptacle) • Does no interface with occupancy sensors SW7PR MAF-FL MAF-FV-XX MAF-FVY-XX Replace XX with finish 25.05 25.05 7.50 3.00 7.50 3.00 25.00 6.38 .43 25.05 25.05 7.50 3.00 7.50 3.00 25.00 6.38 .43 25.05 25.05 7.50 3.00 7.50 3.00 25.00 6.38 .43 Beacon Products • 2041 58th Avenue Circle East Bradenton, FL 34203 • Phone: 800-345-4928 Due to our continued efforts to improve our products, product specifications are subject to change without notice. © 2018 BEACON PRODUCTS, All Rights Reserved • For more information visit our website: www.beaconproducts.com • Printed in USA AuGuST 8, 2018 7:43 AM PERFORMANCE DATA – FLOOD PERFORMANCE DATA – TENNIS COURT 1Lumen values are from photometric tests performed in accordance with IESNA LM-79-08. Data is considered to be representative of the configurations shown. Actual performance may differ as a result of end-user environment and application. 1Lumen values are from photometric tests performed in accordance with IESNA LM-79-08. Data is considered to be representative of the configurations shown. Actual performance may differ as a result of end-user environment and application. 5K7 (5000K nominal, 70 CRI) 4K7 (4000K nominal, 70 CRI)3K7(3000K nominal, 70 CRI) System Watts 120-277V DISTRIBUTION TYPE LUMENS LPW1 MAX BEAM CANDLEPOWER LUMENS LPW1 MAX BEAM CANDLEPOWER LUMENS LPW1 MAX BEAM CANDLEPOWER 265 N 30726 116 317935 29660 112 306902 28318 107 293020 M 28834 108 88608 27834 104 85534 26575 99 81664 W 29370 109 22723 28351 106 21935 27069 101 20942 300 N 33617 113 347849 32450 109 335778 30983 104 320590 M 31547 105 96946 30453 101 30453 29075 97 89348 W 32134 106 24861 31019 103 23999 29616 98 22913 330 N 36308 109 375698 35048 105 362661 33463 100 346256 M 34073 101 104707 32891 97 101073 31403 93 96501 W 34706 102 26852 33502 99 25920 31986 94 24747 380 N 43726 116 452447 42208 112 436746 39919 106 413059 M 41034 108 126097 39610 104 121721 37461 98 115120 W 41796 109 32337 40346 106 31215 38158 100 29522 425 N 47840 113 495017 46179 109 477838 43675 103 451923 M 44894 105 137961 43336 101 133174 40986 95 125951 W 45729 106 35380 44142 102 34152 41748 97 32300 470 N 51670 109 534648 49877 105 516094 47172 99 488104 M 48488 101 149006 46806 97 143835 44267 92 136035 W 49390 102 38212 47676 99 36886 45090 93 34886 490 N 56725 116 586958 54757 112 566589 51787 106 535861 M 53233 108 163585 51385 104 157908 48599 98 149344 W 54222 109 41951 52340 106 40495 49502 100 38299 550 N 62062 113 642184 59909 109 619899 56659 103 586279 M 58241 105 178977 56220 101 172766 53171 95 163396 W 59324 106 45898 57265 102 44305 54159 97 41903 610 N 67031 109 693597 64705 105 669528 61196 99 633216 M 62904 101 193306 60721 97 186598 57428 92 176478 W 64073 102 49573 61850 99 47853 58495 93 45257 5K (5000K nominal, 70 CRI) 4K (4000K nominal, 70 CRI) 3K (3000K nominal, 70 CRI) # LED’S DRIVE CURRENT (MILLIAMPS) SYSTEM WATTS DISTRIBUTION TYPE LUMENS LPW1 B U G LUMENS LPW1 B U G LUMENS LPW1 B U G 104 800 265 TC 32936 122 3 0 3 31793 118 2 0 3 30069 112 2 0 3 104 900 300 36034 119 3 0 3 34783 115 3 0 3 32897 109 3 0 3 104 1000 330 38919 114 3 0 3 37568 110 3 0 3 35531 104 3 0 3 148 800 380 46869 122 3 0 4 45243 118 3 0 4 42789 112 3 0 4 148 900 425 51279 119 3 0 4 49499 115 3 0 4 46815 108 3 0 4 148 1000 470 55385 114 3 0 4 53463 110 3 0 4 50564 104 3 0 4 192 800 490 60804 122 3 0 4 58694 118 3 0 4 55511 112 3 0 4 192 900 550 66525 119 3 0 5 64217 114 3 0 4 60734 108 3 0 4 192 1000 610 71851 115 3 0 5 69358 111 3 0 5 65596 105 3 0 4 Beacon Products • 2041 58th Avenue Circle East Bradenton, FL 34203 • Phone: 800-345-4928 Due to our continued efforts to improve our products, product specifications are subject to change without notice. © 2018 BEACON PRODUCTS, All Rights Reserved • For more information visit our website: www.beaconproducts.com • Printed in USA AuGuST 8, 2018 7:43 AM PROJECTED LUMEN MAINTENANCE AMBIENT TEMP.0 25,000 50,000 1TM-21-11 60,000 100,000 Calculated L70 (HOURS) 25°C / 77°F 1 0.95 0.90 0.89 0.80 >150,000 40°C / 104°F 0.99 0.93 0.88 0.86 0.78 >145,000 1 Projected per IESNA TM-21-11 Data references the extrapolated performance projections for the base model in a 25°C ambient, based on 10,000 hours of LED testing per IESNA LM-80-08. ELECTRICAL DATA AMBIENT TEMPERATURE LUMEN MULTIPLIER 0°C 32°F 1.05 10°C 50°F 1.02 20°C 68°F 1.01 25°C 77°F 1.00 30°C 86°F 0.99 40°C 104°F 0.98 50°C 122°F 0.96 Use these factors to determine relative lumen output for average ambient temperatures from 0-40°C (32-104°F). # OF LEDS NUMBER OF DRIVERS DRIVE CURRENT (mA) INPUT VOLTAGE (V) SYSTEM POWER (W) CURRENT (Amps) 192 2 1000 120 628 5.2 208 3.0 240 2.6 277 2.3 347 1.8 480 1.3 2 900 120 561 4.7 208 2.7 240 2.3 277 2.0 347 1.6 480 1.2 2 800 120 493 4.1 208 2.4 240 2.1 277 1.8 347 1.4 480 1.0 148 2 1000 120 484 4.0 208 2.3 240 2.0 277 1.7 347 1.4 480 1.0 2 900 120 432 3.6 208 2.1 240 1.8 277 1.6 347 1.2 480 0.9 2 800 120 380 3.2 208 1.8 240 1.6 277 1.4 347 1.1 480 0.8 104 1 1000 120 336 2.8 208 1.6 240 1.4 277 1.2 347 1.0 480 0.7 1 900 120 300 2.5 208 1.4 240 1.3 277 1.1 347 0.9 480 0.6 1 800 120 264 2.2 208 1.3 240 1.1 277 1.0 347 0.8 480 0.6