Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
LUA98-093
_.__. ... • el . a III ,I - _._ -4--e 4'. ''''''' t— MP' ' Ma 'ik • i I i•irld-t-L+.77--ta‘>', - Inez,—..... ,.1 ....,..- ....:; lc i•Ir. --i.----1,. - ,A • .......... ..0Vgi' '',(4`... ',"-;'-'24!••• VMS Pill '',4Pi 1 c.,`Q - , . . „ A .- .,,.41 •.,..'4 '' ....------.Arles .1- g V.Ak,W..._77.,„I=2 „. ___. --- ..___.' MI ..,. k ; .. - Ull J- ,fr, ,, 11511 1501E' II!iti ' -411itzteimr. ' 1411 L PRi-'141FH" r 'NM I - i - A7! -:' 4-1 Pp .0NN`114401111111'ws'"1' III -2 I IIE 4:1,,s z r.__;;Wiliiiiiiiiiiiiiiilt;-1 ----,2•0.1. e.eas.,-.. "4 .3 - , 111111::14„.4'".A!.. jr 1,.•1••• •• , •?.._.t.- ' 21--'-''.--"C'Tipir,1,-,,,•-• 4. Of..f., -4-Ti.• firr:P27r-11:.: .- - 1 i- --4 - !,.. ‘ r4 il '''L -' IMPW‘',::,•"=-' allir '7k '..* '1:ait 1 111.libbi i e - -• -- . L4, ,44 l'..'.1 Ailfbilikattilt --: i 1 .-i.;,;14.--_-:_• .% ..,1t., --....„,111F4iii.y.-7-...r7.71a ".L...... ....mai ' -1 .. , 1 P : :.• ,740 li '.. 7 : . r,.,.' \ .. -...:re.:4:1 -Npri. ._.,,a,/ I I , al°1 2,,',i it Block 62,N.H.Latimer's Lake'Washington Plat,according to plat thereof mcorded I in'Volume 6 of Plats,page 70,records of King County,Washington, ..e. .. - ,s \\"'. '.1116 ' ;"--,'...- -- except that portion conveyed for Renton Ave.Extension,and half of the vacated South .1 '.*.Y .',..,.-...- • 131 st Street adjoining. „< avvp C100 s F T P 4,E �tug/SW” 0871+ -iti n Approx 1" =200 ft . May26, 1998 k h' ,p T ,2 57rc'. 54 2,0v sq-ter c°AKg P Y Rend vet) .. ezoc T,es. • p 1 . GUm'r's` `� cats /a oa < 1. -.t ., .... 14 tiel- V— ''S `,;so J y , 6/1 \6 .tle CS1 eC'\L y-,,,o)t. ,1; , OIC • w • (Block 62, N.H. Latimer's Lake Washington Plat, according to plat Thereof recorded in Volume 6 of Plats, page 70, records of King County, Washington, except that portion conveyed for Renton Ave. Extension, and half of the vacated South 131 st Street adjoining. 14 - ,°F-* DEVELOPMENT PLA." \:;;'JG CITY OF RENTON JUN031998 RECEIVED • ' . :" Nr. �T _ ., •..-„ _ is'4'4 N - — - -__M- Nou N •--ra-'r...--. ,- 1.-1 1 ,�.�elu N• ♦TM a?'"+•-. ., r, .1..G. �fJ� �-ti.- ,.. - �- A�•.{ .. ',- - I \ ri',� • ■,I-�1 �� •O�I •S^ ��I =s. 1 I .1 1I'll, i©Ulf .�%t i 4; '. ; A,r �, It if I. - ® ;T ' .�� At, E KA� ��1 APProx . 1" =4 0 ft . L r _ .�../�,� . ,.., ;r't ✓, t• , _}...� 4- ..t. . •`b May 2 6, 19 98 WI 1 ';-- _ E .$ s' T Ili ,,,r jam__ h! - �_�.__ .: i F ; 1 A41/ 1 t �,2. �1'11 GJ .,AO 7 1 •' _At_ i , 1,44 T'`�'IU'. • ' ' , _ - -1 M 7f 17 37 `J Mlt '-__--_ ✓ ♦/`t,�••y�"� �,•, au�i ® • •q/� • �` •'��• 1 � itµ�J�- .4 C ..." ! I ' •"'-‘r .:••?, ; lj ..... 1A- - 1.. • • • c . .'i . "." • 4,..."' A , 3„,....„ .3 •: : I -- -.... a ',.,e r t i r P " •• ,rt MR11; ilyllt.,s •. =• •/ 1' `F 1,. i t l hi d� t}` i �n++ -i to.•,.. . it.31 3 ..,...t i+ .....' r 1 ',,A ! . i ,c 4- 44111 -• - - 1 :11112 i i .__ ' _ia A .$, ii IA- t,„s, / .., — •:_•••3 -'' At ' - IA 1 Iv ca.-1-__ • -Ilit'-'*• rigill I • ' r• s - - I - -�• • •<• 'I ;:1;A b M E. .C, • — • Y '��.'Lt ` i y 1 i c ■*� + ice�i n .. ti ,� I .��T •,s ,... , f n ii . ,"..f...`...11 ...tAl 1111• •41..111". . \ .. ' -ie.„_ „, . . -.....* " : I : , ••A , : nmillimr .„,pril 1 MIN r .. . II,je, .-. • tEMI Cr �! r► .1� ^-1 -- ii - �. �f1� �" r3 i �` \ i 1 '..F• 1 1 ••.ir' hi-17 " G•1 .� : z. I i it____...-..:. 3 • I: • •PCB • , ' . j ;i i f •i t 14. 4" `t t • ' ' I j ' 6 —•• = • -'� - 11 7 f ' • + L� � '' I., I ` — • r rt :l ., 1 !%• ! 7 + 4r'i ," V • eta}• of �� " = IS ,'•r , r. i s .r• .•-`-'� rN f rj[ '<`. �'ig � •mr �• I�` r i ., r� ,y "� +� ` �,+� �"� 'S r• '• .� ,• . ..... Y . � ..,t� _ �•J ` �i 5. TOBIN + y�• Z `` - v ---- i `+--.r.l.. -j4`_ _,I'�,* I , S'~r "Al O Z'Fa rf. r.. . ,?70B.A/p[L3 O impipip. iS ' • ‘ . • " ' - . ,t,''''''.',.. , 41 '.1 A;'- . .. Y�CTII, t i _ 111140411 I , 11 ...5\: i \ i. ••. I .. r ,,r ! rf• J 1j to �, I I. M .. . •J C.+ $ ti. I r ti -� ': ? �" •'___ � •' '- / '•'�'"=u�;�1T,,•;,.,g 1 ; Block 62, N.H. Latimer's Lake Washington Plat, accordingto plat o • • •.";N, ,r thereof recorded in Volume 6 of Plats, page 70, records of King County, Washington, C—` ''`..,,,, \ li:'�.� ; except that portion conveyed for Renton Ave. Extension, and half of the vacated South YGVYVV-ULC:-v3 1+3L3U5-9111-US RANDLES MATTHEW J+MARIAN L+159999 VALADE JERRY L £ CLODAGH 501082 NANCE,PEGGY L 94 HARDIE AVE S W 271 HARDIE AVE NW RENTON WA 98055 1 RENTON WA 98055 420440-0270-01 - 182305-9131-01 j KING OF GLORY MINISTRIES 779999 TOSCO MARKETING CO 742032 221 HARDIE AVE NW PROPERTY TAX DEPT - DC17 RENTON WA 98055 PO BOX 52085 PHOENIX AZ 85072 420440-0275-06 132305-9227-06 KING OF GLORY MINISTRIES 779999 MCDONALDS COPP 046/0017 740127 221 HARDIE AVE NW PO BOX 66207 RENTON WA 98055 AMF OHARE CHICAGO IL 60666 i 420440-0277-04 102305-9234-07 STOCKMYER EVA V 597777 MCDONALDS CORPORATION 429999 264 TAYLOR AVE NW P C BOX 66207 AMF O'HARE RENTON WA 98055 CHICAGO IL 60665 I 420440-0279-02 192305-9237-04 PORTER GOLOIE C477 BURKHEIMER FAMILY L.L.0 THE819999 263 HARDIE NW 1326 5TH AVE STE 708 RENTON WA 98055 SEATTLE WA 98101 420440-0281-08 ^-nR55-02 BENDER V J 601276 STRIES 779999 260 TAYLOR AVE NW 144 RENTON WA 98055 V 5ei Of 90055 OAS 420440-0283-06 KANGAS MARTIN F 409999 01( 0 041532 f 268 TAYLOR AVE NW I+ROBIN A RENTON WA 98055 ell _.-- _ II RENTON WA 98055 420440-0340-07 420440-0262-01 KING OF GLORY MINISTRIES 779999 MATHEWSON/KRANZ 101185 221 HARDIE AVE NW 2271 RAINIER AVE N RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 420440-0345-02 420440-0263-00 KING OF GLORY MINISTRIES 779399 POPE LACHLAN 799935 221 HARDIE AVE NW 11311 I9TH AVE SE #D-227 RENTON WA 93055 EVERETT WA 98208 i •• = CIT'x OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator July 30, 1998 Mr. Robert Minkler Minkler Enterprises 1701 Kennewick Avenue NE Renton, WA 98056 SUBJECT: Minkler Demolition Project No. LUA-98-093,ECF Dear Mr. Minkler: This letter is to inform you that the comment and appeal periods have ended for the Environmental Review Committee's (ERC) Determination of Non-Significance for the above-referenced project. No appeals were filed on the ERC determination. This decision is final and application for the appropriately required permits may proceed If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (425) 430-7270. For the Environmental Review Committee, Lesley Nishihira Project Manager cc: Mr. Robert Burkheimer FINAL.D©C 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 [1.)Thic nnnort-nritntne cin rArvrlari rnatnnal 7n,nncr rnncilmt, • OF RENT ON • CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION MAILING'AFFIDAVIT F'"SERVICE BY M G On the Rill day of , 1998, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope conItaini g SI?C.- d-e,I IA&AlCMS documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing Department of Ecology Don Hurter WSDOT KC Wastewater Treatment Division Larry Fisher Washington Department of Fisheries David F. Dietzman Department of Natural Resources Shirley Lukhang Seattle Public Utilities Duwamish Indian Tribe Rod Malcom Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Joe Jainga Puget Sound Energy (Signature of Sender) ►&. STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that. 39nrk,i . signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act fore uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: U Notary Publi¢' and for he State of ashington Notary (Print) My appointmen r COMMISSION EXPIRES /29/99 Project Name: fv\mkder. IDE..m011.\-iav\ Project Number: >3• 013 , e„ ` LUPt� q [ f� NOTARY.DOC .. ., CIT1 JF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department J e Tannerr,,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator July 09, 1998 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Subject: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination and Environmental Checklist for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on July 07, 1998: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE MINKLER DEMOLITION/LUA-98-093,ECF The applicant seeks environmental review for the demolition of three buildings and two canopies. (Building #1 - one-story 2,700 square foot building, Building #2- 1,200 square foot former gas station, Building #3 - one-story 6,400 square foot building.) All buildings will be vacant by July 1, 1998. Once demolition is complete, the site will be inspected for contaminants and measures to remediate will be taken if any are found. The purpose of the demolition is to allow for a more desirable development on the site. Location: 110 Renton Avenue NW. Comments regarding the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM July 27, 1998. Any aggrieved person feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the time of the determination may submit written comments. After review of the comments, if Environmental Review Committee finds there is not sufficient evidence to amend its original determination, then there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action would need to file a formal appeal within the original 15-day timeframe. Written comments must be filed with: Jana Huerter, Land Use Review Supervisor, City of Renton Development Services Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. If an appeal of the environmental determination is also filed with the Hearing Examiner during the same 15-day comment period, then the Environmental Review Committee will first take action on the request for reconsideration and the appellant will be notified that the appeal is on hold pending the Committee's decision on the reconsideration request. The City will notify the appellant/person requesting reconsideration and parties of record and the Hearing Examiner of the Environmental Review Committee's final determination. The appeal process will then be continued unless the appellant notifies the Hearing Examiner in writing that he wishes to withdraw the appeal. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM July 27, 1998. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. If you have questions, please call me at (425) 430-7270. For the Environmental Review Committee, Lesley Nishillira Project Manager cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division Larry Fisher, Department of Fisheries David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources Don Hurter, Department of Transportation Shirley Lukhang, Seattle Public Utilities Duwamish Tribal Office Rod Malcom, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (Ordinance) Joe Jainga, Puget Sound Energy AGNCYLTR.DOC1 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 MThis paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE APPLICATION NUMBER: LUA-98-093,ECF APPLICANT: Robert A. Minkler PROJECT NAME: Minkler Demolition DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks environmental review for the demolition of three buildings and two canopies. (Building#1 - one-story 2,700 square foot building, Building #2 - 1,200 square foot former gas station, Building #3 - one-story 6,400 square foot building.) All buildings will be vacant by July 1, 1998. Once demolition is complete, the site will be inspected for contaminants and measures to remediate will be taken if any are found. The purpose of the demolition is to allow for a more desirable development on the site. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 110 Renton Avenue Northwest Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Planning 1. If underground tanks exceed 10,000 gallons in size, additional SEPA review will be required prior to removal. 2. SEPA review will also be required if soil remediation requires the excavation of 500 cubic yards or more. Construction Services 1. Applicant is required to obtain demolition permits for each building. Surface/Wastewater 1. Provide temporary erosion control (dust and mud) throughout demolition. 2. Hydroseeding or other means of surface stabilization will be required once site investigation is complete. 3. Protect street, catch basins. Plan Review 1. Applicant is required to obtain permits for cut and cap of side sewers. 2. Permits/Fees will be necessary for service kill of water meters if meters are to be abandoned. Applicant may wish to preserve one or more for future irrigation purposes. Fire Prevention 1. Permits are required to remove any underground storage tanks. CITX OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department J e Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator July 09, 1998 Mr. Robert Minkler Minkler Enterprises 1701 Kennewick Avenue NE Renton, WA 98056 SUBJECT: Minkler Demolition Project No. LUA-98-093,ECF Dear Mr. Minkler: This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) and is to inform you that they have completed their review of the environmental impacts of the above-referenced project. The Committee, on July 07, 1998, decided that your project will be issued a Determination of Non-Significance. The City of Renton ERC has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made by the ERC under the authority of Section 4-6-6, Renton Municipal Code, after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information, on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. Comments regarding the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM July 27, 1998. Any aggrieved person feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the time of the determination may submit written comments. After review of the comments, if Environmental Review Committee finds there is not sufficient evidence to amend its original determination, then there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action would need to file a formal appeal within the original 15-day timeframe. Written comments must be filed with: Jana Huerter, Land Use Review Supervisor, City of Renton Development Services Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. If an appeal of the environmental determination is also filed with the Hearing Examiner during the same 15-day comment period, they the Environmental Review Committee will first take action on the request for reconsideration and the appellant will be notified that the appeal is on hold pending the Committee's decision on the reconsideration request. The City will notify the appellant/person requesting reconsideration and parties of record and the Hearing Examiner of the Environmenta Review Committee's final determination. The appeal process will then be continued unless the appellant notifies the Hearing Examiner in writing that he wishes to withdraw the appeal. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM July 27, 1998. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the requirec $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals tc the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at (425) 430-7270. For the Environmental Review Committee, t'S/ ) Lesley Nishihira Project Manager cc: Mr. Robert Burkheimer DNSLTR.DOC 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE APPLICATION NUMBER: LUA-98-093,ECF APPLICANT: Robert A. Minkler PROJECT NAME: Minkler Demolition DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks environmental review for the demolition of three buildings and two canopies. (Building #1 - one-story 2,700 square foot building, Building #2 - 1,200 square foot former gas station, Building #3 - one-story 6,400 square foot building.) All buildings will be vacant by July 1, 1998. Once demolition is complete, the site will be inspected for contaminants and measures to remediate will be taken if any are found. The purpose of the demolition is to allow for a more desirable development on the site. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 110 Renton Avenue Northwest Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Planning 1. If underground tanks exceed 10,000 gallons in size, additional SEPA review will be required prior to removal. 2. SEPA review will also be required if soil remediation requires the excavation of 500 cubic yards or more. Construction Services 1. Applicant is required to obtain demolition permits for each building. Surface/Wastewater 1. Provide temporary erosion control (dust and mud) throughout demolition. 2. Hydroseeding or other means of surface stabilization will be required once site investigation is complete. 3. Protect street, catch basins. Plan Review 1. Applicant is required to obtain permits for cut and cap of side sewers. 2. Permits/Fees will be necessary for service kill of water meters if meters are to be abandoned. Applicant may wish to preserve one or more for future irrigation purposes. Fire Prevention 1. Permits are required to remove any underground storage tanks. CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE APPLICATION NUMBER: LUA-98-093,ECF APPLICANT: Robert A. Minkler PROJECT NAME: Minkler Demolition DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks environmental review for the demolition of three buildings and two canopies. (Building #1 - one-story 2,700 square foot building, Building #2 - 1,200 square foot former gas station, Building #3 - one-story 6,400 square foot building.) All buildings will be vacant by July 1, 1998. Once demolition is complete, the site will be inspected for contaminants and measures to . will be taken if any are found. The purpose of the demolition is to allow for a more desirable development on the site. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 110 Renton Avenue Northwest LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section This Determination of Non-Significance is issued under WAC 197-11-340. Because other agencies of jurisdiction may be involved, the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fifteen (15) days. Comments regarding the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM July 27, 1998. Any aggrieved person feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the time of the determination may submit written comments. After review of the comments, if Environmental Review Committee finds there is not sufficient evidence to amend its original determination, then there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action would need to file a formal appeal within the original 15-day timeframe. Written comments must be filed with: Jana Huerter, Land Use Review Supervisor, City of Renton Development Services Division, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. If an appeal of the environmental determination is also filed with the Hearing Examiner during the same 15-day comment period, then the Environmental Review Committee will first take action on the request for reconsideration and the appellant will be notified that the appeal is on hold pending the Committee's decision on the reconsideration request. The City will notify the appellant/person requesting reconsideration and parties of record and the Hearing Examiner of the Environmental Review Committee's final determination. The appeal process will then be continued unless the appellant notifies the Hearing Examiner in writing that he wishes to withdraw the appeal. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM July 27, 1998. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. PUBLICATION DATE: July 13, 1998 DATE OF DECISION: July 07, 1998 ,E SIGNATURES: /7/ t' Gr qfiC1i( DAAAA7777Departlanning/Buildi ublic Works m Shepherd;Administrator DA E ��K ommunity Services Departure „, 7, ,,i-- . ALeez----- /,, ig-,_ r Fir'+s ChiZDATE / Renton Fire Department DNSSIG.DOC CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE APPLICATION NUMBER: LUA-98-093,ECF _ V APPLICANT: Robert A. Minkler PROJECT NAME: Minkler Demolition DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks environmental review for the demolition of three buildings and two canopies. (Building#1 - one-story 2,700 square foot building, Building #2 - 1,200 square foot former gas station, Building #3 - one-story 6,400 square foot building.) All buildings will be vacant by July 1, 1998. Once demolition is complete, the site will be inspected for contaminants and measures to remediate will be taken if any are found. The purpose of the demolition is to allow for a more desirable development on the site. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 110 Renton Avenue Northwest Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Planning 1. If underground tanks exceed 10,000 gallons in size, additional SEPA review will be required prior to removal. 2. SEPA review will also be required if soil remediation requires the excavation of 500 cubic yards or more. Construction Services 1. Applicant is required to obtain demolition permits for each building. Surface/Wastewater 1. Provide temporary erosion control (dust and mud) throughout demolition. 2. Hydroseeding or other means of surface stabilization will be required once site investigation is complete. 3. Protect street, catch basins. Plan Review 1. Applicant is required to obtain permits for cut and cap of side sewers. 2. Permits/Fees will be necessary for service kill of water meters if meters are to be abandoned. Applicant may wish to preserve one or more for future irrigation purposes. Fire Prevention 1. Permits are required to remove any underground storage tanks. 1401-1.CE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: MINKLER DEMOLITION PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-98-097,ECF The applicant seeks environmental review for the demolition of three buildings and two canopies. (Building at- one-story 2,700 square foot building,Building 82-1,200 square fool former gas station,Building 80-one-story 8,400 square loot building.) All buildings will be vacant by July 1,1998. Once demolition Is complete,the site will be Inspected for contaminants and measures to remediate will be taken if any are found.The purpose of the . demolition is to allow for a more desirable development on the site.Location:110 Renton Avenue NW. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Comments regarding the environmental determination moat be filed in writing on or before 6:00 PM July 27, 1998. Any aggrieved person feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee Is based on erroneous procedure,errors of law or fad,error in judgment.or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the lime or the determination may submit written comments.After review of the comments,If Environmental Review Committee finds there is not sufficient evidence to amend its original determination,then there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action would need to file a formal appeal within the original 15-day timeframe. Written comments must be filed with: Jana Hoarier,Land Use Review Supervisor,City of Renton Development Services Division,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055. If an appeal of • the environmental determination is also filed with the Hearing Examiner during the same 15-day comment period,Then the Environmental Review Committee wit first take action on the request for reconsideration and the appellant will be notified that the appeal is on hold pending the Committee's decision on the reconsideration request.The City will notify the appellantiperson requesting reconsideration and parties of record and the Hearing Examiner of the Environmental Review Committee's final determination. The appeal process will then be continued unless the appellant notifies the Hearing Examiner in writing that he wishes to withdraw the appeal.Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed In writing on or before 5:00 PM July 27,1998. Appeals must be fled In writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with:Hearing Examiner,City of Renton,200 Mill Avenue South,Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are govemed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11B. L r, tJ, 4 r,r ii "..f_ : 1(If87t . 4afl +caj^ py I l {``A }T P r FOR FURTHER INFORMATION,CEEASSE V SOON ATNTACT (HE CITY OF RENTON,DEVELOPMENT SERVS00. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION ' Please Include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. I CERTIFICATION I, /, /"/i.,/-✓ . 17 , hereby certify that copies of the above document were posted by me in ? conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on f.T✓ter ( ) ,/? $' • Signed: %i;,,�T fl ATTEST: Subcribed apd worn before me, a Nortary Public,in and for the Stateof Washington residing init , on the 7 YS- day o \C v Cl . c----727604- - . 9 1/--;_,..--,7 1.4.4.ry' ! MARILYN KAMCHEFF COMMISSION EXPIRES 6/29/99 • AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Charlotte Ann Kassens first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of the SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL 600 S. Washington Avenue, Kent, Washington 98032 a daily newspaper published seven (7)times a week. Said newspaper is a legal newspaper of general publication and is now and has been for more than six months NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL prior to the date of publication, referred to, printed and published in the English language DETERMINATION continually as a daily newspaper in Kent, King County, Washington. The South County ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON,WASHINGTON Journal has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the The Environmental Review Committee State of Washington for King County. (ERC)has issued a Determination of Non- The notice in the exact form attached, waspublished in the South CountySignificance for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Journal (and not in supplemental form) which was regularly distributed to the subscribers Code. during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a MINKLER DEMOLITION LUA-98 093,ECF Environmental review for demolition of Minkler Demolition three buildings and two canopies.Location: 110 Renton Ave.NW. The 15 day comment and appeal period as published on: 7/13/98 for this project will run concurrently and end at 5:00 PM on July 27, 1998.Following this, the City will finalize its Determination The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of$38.40 unless comments received require a recon- Legal Number 4913 sideration.Written comments and requests for reconsideration shall be forwarded to the Development Services Division Land Use Review Supervisor. Information on the (Z/ C/` ,/1- /d- e-E(.sZ,_ Projectfile isavailableatthe Development���11171Services Division, Sixth Floor, Renton City Legal Cleric, South County Journal Hall, 1055 So. Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Phone: (425) 430-7200. Appeal f) procedures are available in the City Clerk's - Cll office, First Floor, Municipal Building, 200 Subscribed and sworn before me on this _I ` �(tay of At iv Mill Ave.So.,Renton,WA 98055. Published in the South County Journal July 13, 1998.4913 (a.Zti(251--r— c.. ,..._ m / `��\N��e,,%,.1'''• I,;/c��'•,�i Notary Public of the State of Washington /,•:. /'-� residing in Renton <4;. �,; King County, Washington ^:' ••y 7. 0 .,,/iiii,,F W A`5 10 `,V`a` NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. MINKLER DEMOLITION LUA-98-093,ECF Environmental review for demolition of three buildings and two canopies. Location: 110 Renton Ave. NW. The 15 day comment and appeal period for this project will run concurrently and end at 5:00 PM on July 27, 1998. Following this, the City will finalize its Determination unless comments received require a reconsideration. Written comments and requests for reconsideration shall be forwarded to the Development Services Division Land Use Review Supervisor. Information on the project file is available at the Development Services Division, Sixth Floor, Renton City Hall, 1055 So. Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Phone: (425) 430-7200. Appeal procedures are available in the City Clerk's office, First Floor, Municipal Building, 200 Mill Ave. So., Renton, WA 98055. Publication Date: July 13, 1998 Account No. 51067 dnspub i STAFF City of Renton REPORT Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE A. BACKGROUND ERC MEETING DATE July 07, 1998 Project Name Minkler Demolition Applicant Robert A. Minkler File Number LUA-098-093,ECF Project Manager Lesley Nishihira Project Description The applicant seeks environmental review for the demolition of three buildings and two canopies. (Building#1 - one-story 2,700 square foot building, Building #2 - 1,200 square foot former gas station, Building #3 - one-story 6,400 square foot building.) All buildings will be vacant by July 1, 1998. Once demolition is complete, the site will be inspected for contaminants and measures to remediate will be taken if any are found. The purpose of the demolition is to allow for a more desirable development on the site. Project Location 110 Renton Avenue Northwest Exist. Bldg. Area gsf 103,000 sq.ft. Proposed New Bldg. Area gsf N/A Site Area 51,250 sq.ft. Total Building Area gsf N/A It:: .,. >i>iYi '•1` a �_. �r©_" =Ea A� �t ft„} TIE l-ii `, wg , _..,--4,21.;;,, ,.,.,7i,--, awe,: a 'F pawy 1 t}'q $ NEz 'BC I:- 44#40 1'Oat" — --i'tr, 11 Atil . ►r.1fi I .,�o —' S /, ..ON��.'}—gy�pp�,, ■pp. ■ ' : --f 1` 1 / ,_: ---. A, .01 1-, , _ I7 • m _I 7.7. all -a;` I,; ;.�-- • SQ=- .C' YwY, _ t •r t•:= Aa.-. . \' 1 ,7!r,J;1f'^I i1.i Block 62,N.H.t aomefsALake Washington Plat,according to pi ,,f \\• I.• .•� thereof recorded in Volume 6 of Plats page 70,records of King County,Washington. _ except that portion conveyed for Renton Ave.Extension,and half of the vacated Soot �• — Ulst Street adoining. Project Location Map ERCRPT.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department ronmental Review Committee StaffReport MINKLER DEMOLITION LUA-98-093,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OFJULY 07,1998 Paget of 4 RECOMMENDATION Staff Recommend that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of B. RECOMMENDATION Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommend that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINATION OF DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED. XX Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period with Concurrent 14 da A••eal Period. Issue DNS with 15 day Comment Period Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period with Concurrent 14 day Appeal Period. followed by a 14 day Appeal Period. C. MITIGATION MEASURES None required. Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Planning 1. If underground tanks exceed 10,000 gallons in size, additional SEPA review will be required prior to removal. 2. SEPA review will also be required if soil remediation requires the excavation of 500 cubic yards or more. Construction Services 1. Applicant is required to obtain demolition permits for each building. Surface/Wastewater 1. Provide temporary erosion control (dust and mud) throughout demolition. 2. Hydroseeding or other means of surface stabilization will be required once site investigation is complete. 3. Protect street, catch basins. Plan Review 1. Applicant is required to obtain permits for cut and cap of side sewers. 2. Permits/Fees will be necessary for service kill of water meters if meters are to be abandoned. Applicant may wish to preserve one or more for future irrigation purposes. Fire Prevention 1. Permits are required to remove any underground storage tanks. ERCRPT.DOC City of Renton PB/PWDepartment ronmental Review Committee Staff Report MINKLER DEMOLITION LUA-98-093,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OFJULY 07,1998 Page3 of 4 D. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS In compliance with RCW 43.21 C. 240, the following project environmental review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. Has the applicant adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed development? 1. Earth Impacts: The applicant indicates that the soils on the subject site may be contaminated. Once the demolition is complete, the applicant has stated the property will be inspected for environmental contamination and measures will be taken to remediate if contaminants are found. If remediation requires the excavation of 500 cubic yards or more, additional environmental review will be required. Underground tanks associated with the former gas station may also be located on the site. The applicant will need to obtain the necessary permits as required by code for the removal of the tanks. Environmental review will also be required if the tanks exceed 10,000 gallons in size. The applicant will need to cover the exposed soil to prevent wind and water erosion. Hydroseeding or other approved means of surface stabilization will be required once the site investigation is complete. Mitigation Measures: None required. Nexus: N/A 2. Air Impacts: Air quality impacts would be associated with the actual demolition of the building and exhaust from the construction vehicles. The demolition of the building could cause some fugitive dust to be released into the air. This will be mitigated by sprinkling the site as needed in accordance with the requirements of the Municipal Code. Exhaust from the construction vehicles is already controlled by state and federal regulations. No further site specific mitigation measures are required. Mitigation Measures: None required. Nexus: N/A 3. Water Impacts: The demolition of the building will not generate additional impervious area and will not cause an increase in the amount of surface water generated during a storm event from this site. However, storm water runoff could cause soil erosion if the applicant does not provide and maintain adequate temporary erosion control measures. The applicant will provide and maintain temporary erosion control measures during the demolition of the building. After the buildings are removed, the applicant will be required to hydroseed the site to ensure that no erosion occurs. Mitigation Measures: None required. Nexus: N/A E. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS The proposal has been circulated to City Departmental/Divisional Reviewers for their review. Where applicable, these comments have been incorporated into the text of this report as Mitigation Measures and/or Notes to Applicant. X Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. ERCRPT.DOC City of Renton PB/PWDepartment ronmental Review Committee Staff Report MINKLER DEMOLITION LUA-98-093,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OFJULY 07, 1998 Page4 of 4 • Environmental Determination Comment Process Comments regarding the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM July 27, 1998. Any aggrieved person feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the time of the determination may submit written comments. After review of the comments, if Environmental Review Committee finds there is not sufficient evidence to amend its original determination, then there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action would need to file a formal appeal within the original 15-day timeframe. Written comments must be filed with: Jana Huerter, Land Use Review Supervisor, City of Renton Development Services Division, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. If an appeal of the environmental determination is also filed with the Hearing Examiner during the same 15-day comment period, then the Environmental Review Committee will first take action on the request for reconsideration and the appellant will be notified that the appeal is on hold pending the Committee's decision on the reconsideration request. The City will notify the appellant/person requesting reconsideration and parties of record and the Hearing Examiner of the Environmental Review Committee's final determination. The appeal process will then be continued unless the appellant notifies the Hearing Examiner in writing that he wishes to withdraw the appeal. Environmental Determination Appeal Process Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM July 27, 1998. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. ERCRPT.DOC City 'en ton Department of Planning/Building/f Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: TAW-5 COMMENTS DUE: JUNE 22, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-093,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 8, 1998 APPLICANT: Minkler Enterprises/Robert Minkler PROJECT MANAGER: Mark Pywell PROJECT TITLE: Minkler Demolition WORK ORDER NO: 78397 LOCATION: 110 Renton Avenue NW SITE AREA: 51,250 sq.ft. BUILDING AREA(gross): Total 103,000 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks environmental review of the demolition of three buildings. Building#1 is a one story 2,700 sq.ft. building. Building#2 is a 1,200 sq.ft. metal gas station building. Building#3 is a 6,400 sq.ft. one-story cement block building. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics • Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic./Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS / 4k‘ • C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS cu7, 7,0 iLX'ckv, We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional informatioh is)Ieeded to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/9; Cit] Renton Department of Planning/Building/f-�.�„c Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ecor • Pe{/. COMMENTS DUE: JUNE 22, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-093,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 8, 1998 APPLICANT: Minkler Enterprises/Robert Minkler PROJECT MANAGER: Mark Pywell PROJECT TITLE: Minkler Demolition WORK ORDER NO: 78397 LOCATION: 110 Renton Avenue NW SITE AREA: 51,250 sq.ft. BUILDING AREA(gross): Total 103,000 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks environmental review of the demolition of three buildings. Building#1 is a one story 2,700 sq.ft. building. Building#2 is a 1,200 sq.ft. metal gas station building. Building#3 is a 6,400 sq.ft. one-story cement block building. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics • Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS �V0 6'oi_tc ( ,ssue_s3 ". C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where addib�'oor aLinformation is needed to properly assess this proposal. 4/1(2 Signature it for or Author' d e resentative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 / City,o; ;ton Department of Planning/Building/PuL.._ . 'orks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW/ SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 7 I'LC, COMMENTS DUE: JUNE 22, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-093,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 8, 1998 APPLICANT: Minkler Enterprises/Robert Minkler PROJECT MANAGER: Mark Pywell PROJECT TITLE: Minkler Demolition WORK ORDER NO: 78397 LOCATION: 110 Renton/Avenue NW SITE AREA: 51,250 sq.ft. I BUILDING AREA(gross): Total 103,000 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks environmental review of the demolition of three buildings. Building#1 is a one story 2,700 sq.ft. building. Building#2 is a 1,200 sq.ft. metal gas station building. Building#3 is a 6,400 sq.ft. one-story cement block building. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics • Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services .- Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet 72tu/ i2 Lihac f an- yJoL« •ZISA vtcI.)a_•' B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or area: where a ditional information is needed to properly asse this proposal. n r1/ f ,./ h _ 6 /-i- 7' f) Signatur of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.1 G/9. City o lton Department of Planning/Building/Put,,. ..orks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: C StY 1(,,ii , COMMENTS DUE: JUNE 22, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-093,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 8, 1998— APPLICANT: Minkler Enterprises/Robert Minkler PROJECT MANAGER: Mark Pywell PROJECT TITLE: Minkler Demolition WORK ORDER NO: 78397 JUN u d 1998 LOCATION: 110 Renton Avenue NW 1 1�, '�ylLLJ,ry2 L)IVISioN SITE AREA: 51,250 sq.ft. BUILDING AREA(gross): Total 103,000 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks environmental review of the demolition of three buildings. Building#1 is a one story 2,700 sq.ft. building. Building#2 is a 1,200 sq.ft. metal gas station building. Building#3 is a 6,400 sq.ft. one-story cement block building. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics • Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS "V 1/14 r A 4 41-714f4(-"44° — We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where ditional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. ignature of Di ct r or Authorized Representa' Date DEV APP.DOC Rev.1 C/9: —.ma1 City enton Department of Planning/Building/F Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 1✓ahg or-VA-Vi dm COMMENTS DUE: JUNE 22, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-093,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 8, 1998 .-..Tr rrr► r7N 8 ON! APPLICANT: Minkler Enterprises/Robert Minkler PROJECT MANAGER: Mark Pywell PROJECT TITLE: Minkler Demolition WORK ORDER NO: 78397 JUN 8 8 1998 LOCATION: 110 Renton Avenue NW i. SITE AREA: 51,250 sq.ft. I BUILDING AREA(gross): Total 103,00n`erft..°' %-' "i v lziCJN SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks environmental review of the demolition of three buildings. Building#1 is a one story 2,700 sq.ft. building. Building#2 is a 1,200 sq.ft. metal gas station building. Building#3 is a 6,400 sq.ft. one-story cement block building. i A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics • Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS toNe', We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal, 4AA. ki•Ne 3K1/4;4cm,14. 6 110 i 1 b Signa u e f Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP Rev.10/03 City.,, ,.enton Department of Planning/Building/P _ Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Sur-FDce IWas-cW4YCOMMENTS DUE: JUNE 22, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-093,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 8, 1998 APPLICANT: Minkler Enterprises/Robert Minkler PROJECT MANAGER: Mark Pywell ne Agnt, PROJECT TITLE: Minkler Demolition WORK ORDER NO: 78397own LOCATION: 110 Renton Avenue NW SITE AREA: 51,250 sq.ft. BUILDING AREA(gross): Total 103,000u0 sq sq.tt.'NG DIVISION SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks environmental review of the demolition of three buildings. Building#1 is a one story 2,700 sq.ft. building. Building#2 is a 1,200 sq.ft. metal gas station building. Building#3 is a 6,400 sq.ft. one-story cement block building. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals _ Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS CAT AND Cgi) S1DG SerBYL Tortc.T S1R.4e'r 1 CATu+ 3AsI NS . t 2 u'b G b u sT, M,u t c_o to R4 L. TweougHour Del-t o c.I T7 o U. NybRo s€.e� oQ. coTbt'?lt. App .'C e-kEA1JS csY Su2FACE STABIU3AT100 u�+i-ic, l�ttw Co js i crust.) gewitts-O. We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. "1/4<Lecv 1.3‘ 61/0A5 Signs ure o Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DO Rev.10/93 City . _'enton Department of Planning/Building/F_._.. Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET `T"(-)F RENTON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: QYt KeVicv✓ COMMENTS DUE: JUNE 22, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-093,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 8, 1998 ,dog APPLICANT: Minkler Enterprises/Robert Minkler PROJECT MANAGER: Mark Pywell PROJECT TITLE: Minkler Demolition _ WORK ORDER NO: 78397 ..0111-1.dnvio LMVISION LOCATION: 110 Renton Avenue NW SITE AREA: 51,250 sq.ft. ( BUILDING AREA(gross): Total 103,000 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks environmental review of the demolition of three buildings. Building#1 is a one story 2,700 sq.ft. building. Building#2 is a 1,200 sq.ft. metal gas station building. Building#3 is a 6,400 sq.ft. one-story cement block building. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics • Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS 1?eR.wNTS FOR. CST + Cm of S►bRseux' ReQute4-1 . k?e2rru*Si�as coca_ selv►C-G KtU4 FOB wA I-4 sr i 1f= A I6'-s To Re Abu )C�fl. s&or8 MA� bl#lCk ¶ pee elvv6 ouG O2. ► -012-c3 ForZ wrvrt.� �R�►(�A�ftotu R pos . We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. • . {� vEck 6/10/41 Signattof Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.... Rev.10/93 RENTON FIRE DEPT City _. __enton Department of Planning/Building/F Works FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU ENVIRONMENTAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIE(W0SIjI ET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: f Yc1WNGVho14' COMMENTS DUE: JUNE 22, 1998IECEI 1�' APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-093,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 8, 1998 V D APPLICANT: Minkler Enterprises/Robert Minkler PROJECT MANAGER: Mark Pywell PROJECT TITLE: Minkler Demolition WORK ORDER NO: 78397 l LOCATION: 110 Renton Avenue NW SITE AREA: 51,250 sq.ft. I BUILDING AREA(gross): Total 103,000 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks environmental review of the demolition of three buildings. Building#1 is a one story 2,700 sq.ft. building. Building#2 is a 1,200 sq.ft. metal gas station building. Building #3 is a 6,400 sq.ft. one-story cement block building. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics • Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet A PIOT r— fnpJ io re 1 B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS v C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS or. �1 /� �f `/ 6 / Lts(, /S QP� i`G 1�,re..p/ A- ' de 44/ !fnA/`�/�dit•.td v.:A4 c 70'0 v We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additio'al information is,needed to properly assess this proposal. 4 0/, Sign- •f Director or Authorize epresentative Date DEVAP• ''• Rev.10/93 a City ?enton Department of Planning/Building/F Works ENVIRONMENTAL 8, DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: "% " COMMENTS DUE: JUNE 22, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-093,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 8, 1998 APPLICANT: Minkler Enterprises/Robert Minkler PROJECT MANAGER: Mark Pywell PROJECT TITLE: Minkler Demolition WORK ORDER NO: 78397 LOCATION: 110 Renton Avenue NW SITE AREA: 51,250 sq.ft. I BUILDING AREA(gross): Total 103,000 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks environmental review of the demolition of three buildings. Building#1 is a one story 2,700 sq.ft. building. Building#2 is a 1,200 sq.ft, metal gas station building. Building#3 is a 6,400 sq.ft. one-story cement block building. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare _Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment Vnp 10,000 Feet ♦WW 14,000 Feet NO None B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS None C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS None We have reviewed this ap•ication with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where add al informa . . needed to properly assess this proposal. 10 I • -I w„ . Q i5g8' Signature, Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.•• Rev.10/93 7__ ....., ,.... _ 7,, - 15_7, — ---- I t■ ' W' r'JA 9 O■ A t__ 1 ii I t . i M tl 1 I li,1* t 00 ik I11 ,` f ' n m F 7 0\ I t f (1. ,r(A). g_..,!,.. sg, wrri . 1 ..t % t`_ a4 , '' m C..)_ �1 yr Alt ._. /11p 1 ► i s: 1 0 iffl'-len will it - il , .7, Igo ;oil .... 7 III a iiiik-\\ u�s.'" / , F SI I t Mr \\"," s, -. - --; l I • 1. irLittaivwv\ ' �� a ••.r.t ` II^ iii"-igigifils ��• F " ®,ill -i:. f. I, J1 \•ti •_t iiirl r�E0� \-7— t . ii. _. 'A � 'mIQ' All O F iiir'�� r jinn. OE f~o� ' ! i�.;.eh 11111/61� r i ,I LAM elMn P WI 111:111111p iff/P- - ® �Va � ,4i.1 pg:44git,11**Nfiriar . witp\y, „Ns,-._ i Ilk 110'iiv',4.1. ill, FRI> reiv4/44cui 11,..„ MIL- '11 il 41114 NINIUMILI A k.• -7-1vdittit 111111ari i s.:7-...-1-0 ff / lfk - 44. -- ri-li .1Ne,---t, ,, tcce • ®t� pia,-\ ,,...., y1.3 a�,�J� 7, •.F 1 A I • t.,,� mrirs i uumnai min iii iiitt r. ..,,, --- - illi—ceji�uLI.l i i t•t.t r 3j,� Ij j 7 d tIII[i+xiLT] .,a.t _ _ ' g • . cit-it_Evi-- to tn m ' 1 Ei__L.111111 I • - "" inikluij " 11,1'JL V V dia\k .;,... ..• Itija.=,„51111111.11h1" 4_2%4 +31111 I I-ir ' tii s' — j 111 ILD:LF"...-1-1- [LH ? '..41 : . " -.-5":1-1]-----=-:::::-_--::: °El__ *"! . t=juame .! - li lif 1?(L-4- ` I A - —_____�'-- _-- -_— O a�D_ `eV a r—1 E vfi E — —7.—:—:—.7-7.—.7—:—:—:—:::::::::::::::_:_:_::::: —...:..:_::______Ilry cs,„A -11 iwri.1- Di . �a. \� mo ___=_==__=======__= _ =__ ___=__==_  _ ----7,-,;.'..:-.- .n•-•.::...`..4 . ___.,._..,,,_._ 6/% I I- ' ..... - -- - ----"7" ' '- --.-‘41--.- ---+ •• ti i Ati<Li----e 0 I .. .. .. _ . . . No Riff- , -E9 i , a ....:d •::: •4'.14.„.........1,!.•I ••4.--- - - , '.•'1• .... I •.• , I fi .1_:,..:1 1,..,,t r :II V.1•d___,;•i,..,-i... -, ,:...,.1!.,_..:..e,..! ,i .a, I, I ;• ...'il• i ! it ..• • A • , 1 s -1:-. t Approx . 1" =40 ft . ... ... -do 1• 1:, , . ,:::, .. ::.-: ; 2,...f; •-A -II , •-:,*:: i /nl: ., . - - -:. ___ _ t A ••`! . • . kgto_.137, 1:_ j. .J. •;.,-- . ., F- .- May 2 6, 19 98 ,. ..1,'.. •• ••-•••• : ..'' ... .... I ..i...2 4.--:V 1..(''. "... ...- _..,.._.,;,..... 1 . ••:•..11'.." 41 •": 7,----'-L'-', . .• -----4 f :*--. F: ',,:".. --; 1"' "° '' • • --- ., ,S"'/T Zz- •--, . ..,.:::: , /-7.--•31,...‘•'hi-3 -.---,-/- 1' 7...:...l'e •••„:;.e; , ... _............... . • • •\ 1 ,S) a. .4: .•- •:. , 1 .-- ; • -......'•:i I • /--7-...„.pr, .: 4 ..e.. . - , ....-: , •P.,..2 _ 3 4,(173.:.I h A :> :.... 'IX o i C--' ::::, _ -4-.._.!•!... . .,. A . : : Ami • &I.•:•:, .•:-:* GIVIO . 1., : ,4 :..,... •..a., • . it • , /...e i , 'Z. 3 1 I -----'3- • IMMleArd.2:: T ' . • •ii ; $ . ,nx. _,,..._-•-,.‘"--4.1' •-- II V..... .1•...!I - - - ---- -- 1 1. 7.I ...,•.3' : .1, I A.1," •• • ::•1 ...t-T4' •,••; ME ‘ "'. .y. ,, . t : • .. - --- .7 '4.0.f 5.:,•.:41 0,41 g:.r•. •• - --.1- ? . . : •%.• 1 . 7 1 -1- .1 MA= ' ' '-..' , - • , - ..... AI • • ••••••! .44.• • 3 --'• m 31w sT •....; - ...- 3,•2: 1 - -Ai 1 4 F-4- I ,2.•A . fr.. g . 1 ._1___.., ,... ..-- . , ..,"4)- , , .. ,....., .., .. : /.1 ' 70. ' :••••e. t C i 7'31:; "/; 1.t ---. 1.: '----•': . : i! '11 -1.1 , • 1 u,I -L:'•;;1's 4 .,, ... _ .I; '. t., .1:I ' ., f: .' . -4. , - --- • ____._ ....• i • ..., .., . , 13 ...„61 t: '2.41";to..-:.... ' • 3 •••:111. •••••.4_ 4V•V./A • '\ N 4/. „.....o, • Ns‘° ; . - ,,, 7 I • .:7-•••t :,i 0• •••• .• IA- h. .: :••• ::;.I • . --. --..2 • ••• t• o It .••• I o ! ....... • :.:• 3 . •2.i. ..• 41'..... "t"4• 30 e of 1 '•••1 .••••I * -- - . # t ,' 1 1,1‘ / .'-..,.'c'.. • '.: sfts.c. . . . =. • A.. .., co4,4c c,AL ,i1„,--161411flamitz -r.,111-11-"impilliiii -1__;.-.., . ..3.: ...._ .... 0. ..._ ,,, , ... 4 1 4.• - , I •-c• •, .- 3:.:1 ..., . .,......„7,......_„,....• , ......_ ,,,,. ., ..„..... . to ..21 .. -- 3 - - - ---AMIE ' riiMilelr; : "Fr. •g , . 11 X •i dOr 1 ... ...: 13 •• •• - '''- - .- • 14 ; ......::lil tr.37 '.1.i ••• ...... 1 - -- ----i :' --. .- • i - .••• " Iv- -:-...f--...34 ,irdralliellej . ; . .... .... II, , ,4% -; ,)',\ b., ,: . <A ' i „ 1.-. 1 A „,-, . A : ,...., . , . . ; :,. .. . • lf___. 4 ' :-.-•. r, .' : ....- .::.?' .3';',..•_<eel! • - • -' /142--Pk . i i ; rl.i• :.:.: : . ... 7 V I, • g Alp •7•T- .-__________ _:: ,.... ; '•• • ',..... i , 4 II.:1,14!.:,...i,:.. ." ... .0 • ..•••• ... I .i. • ' • ••••• ... *! _ ...;••• . 7 • • •••• ... .::',1' - • C' ;.' .../ 41111 °V.III .11.. -:•-....- 'ill 7 ........___._____,_ .-- - -2"---t-"-*-1! ---•--.'1--2-'-i ::::-.a•-• .1 _ _1 . 2 I ,„,,,,, ; . • „ . . , _ . r•-•*.. ---:3- I ' , ...,. rir .,...,.1...s..::.____,_ .i; ., ____...., 30 SA 'I• ....±. . . .A y .t ,.. t _,,. • l 1,z z A ' 4 \ . . ,..."- -;:V;.1.. '''' ' "I i .0., 4! . " ' I 11111, ._._ ?r:i ;*°-6 !1_ ••". • 1 . ' • Of '• ' CI____,,I.A ' 41 -- ? : 3; j 0 •i- •st.4:‘ ••• ::.' ' ,i" 1 > 1 • i i ! • 4 ., 2 . .0 s „2:. • ., Ns.. 6....,4 !„.4 r. • I -•..-• ,./y ', ', V• \ •, -.:.• t 4--• -, -• : - '1- ke" 1.• .. ••firi A.,: ... . • -A,. R .• .. •,...1. '''', 't. .0 'et _, ...., ..ito At, • ... .. • . .4. . • %I. , Is •o 7, i ii; • . , ,j;ss •e-;;;:".-' -<, ,.• .. it irdik .'; gi < .•• el,. i ....•" ..."-,...1-.... DL . __.-.. 0. .1T:i -'Z --1.!ls', ''' - -• --' --,' . 8 C3 ..§ 0&,I.', .1, i NC c ; ...... ' ,.,.....---.2 1!..0); ..::: ,, --*-7;-: ,, .,,,:..._41__,..........,:i:::........;.,, , ..„......, ,,‘. 1 , ,I... .. ..,...._ . TOBIN ; . _ ST __ . • ..° VI I ..... ....*---A '' '_i___, :. .- • . ,---- -- ' i. , .-YA!..F.',... ..,......--;,,,.,• 4 ,,:. •I ,,101a.71111".1 x 1 a riglpillt - , • o ,,,,,.,...- - 3- ..... 9.•••• -• : .7 te .:.....2. r .,...;„..,--. , • ,.. , - , • h•'6%•,.:. - ..d. T lit. i - --. „..... __..-„„„. . ., .` 4 ' ,-1 ', ;,, -.Tiv,'.,: 0..........1 ir Ad i• It •- ...G1 . '11- 'f. (11'• 21 ' . .:•'. r•----•:- 2.•:....„,_ '17.,,„Aii.:2-i•-•i-- •:7-1 . ....• ...1••••,,,, • • . - .... 0 .. \1 -- I.ii:1,..--Is .• ,.. ... V ; .. , ' _... ...., • • sp, v-..... rcro;;Z-1-1. ' r •••••-•"'.. W.1:1 - ' 1 '•1 -- .•'-34 .-C''• ' ' -P-4/1 Jai . , L., .... i •2...__ _ . .. ..,, __ __ • c),.t,k " 44 ,1 . , ,. 1 Gpai:;•?ifziraz __ -i ; 7 • II -! .\ ::\. \ • -".-...1.`- •:%,.**\E , ; \ ..; . :. .,i . i -.._ --- ii SR VICTORIA.g.':, t.i ••••••• .1‘, . Pillir I 4 M.A..... •••do Po ... . -••• ,„:.:......- '7 \ .': . •••..... ,.. r:' ! : ! ..ii 1 ..; "; ", 1 I. . .....";., .... .' -•-•• e.,-. 1, 1 ,t ', il .:, f it, \,i -:...;;;c1t...:, -------ii; ,s ...1 :• i-•••••.4.. ,- i A . 't - ---.49 2.4P.t. . , . : , ....• .. „,:,. • • .. ... \ ./ .Y S;1_:_:.0,1_4,_:.-OLF. •,...0' t 1,,_i Block62;N.H. LatiMer's Lake Washington Plat according to plat .....,10: .. / - i ? • ...• x .,. m • i 1...."' ... - ..-. - thereof recorded in Volume 6 of Plats, page 70, records of King County, Washington, ... •0 I ; . - .- 2.. -•.,. ,. .. 1 ....._ . • \ •...4-, : '...e..\ .1\ .•:::.;.,•-41\ s, r. \ -\ -"•:',1:\ \ 1 --....-..... ....-. ... ......._...".:: j except that portion conveyed for Renton Ave Extension, and half of the vacated t.,,,utli .• - BURKHEIMER• MANAGEMENT COMPANY REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEVELOPMENT PLANNING June 12, 1998 CRY OF RENTON JUN 16 1998 RECEIVED Mr. Mark R. Pywell, AICP Project Manager, Development Services Division 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Re: Project Number/Name: LUA-98-093, ECF/Minkler Demolition Dear Mr. Pywell: Please add my name to parties of record to be notified of further action on this application and subsequent applications. Warm regards, Robert B. Burkheimer RBB/br 1326 - FIFTH AVENUE SUITE 708 SEATTLE WASHINGTON 98101 206/622-4602 FAX 622-2704 CITY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION LIST OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS within 300 feet of the subject site PROJECT NAME: f"i/NA) C E R DC/`/D L 7 T7 a/y APPLICATION NO: LVA ''18. oqs, E The following is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. The Development Services Division will notify these individuals of the proposed development. MA RAC 420440-0265-06 18230'•- %111-' RANDLES MATTHEW J+MAPIAN L+159999 VALADE JERRY L C CLCGAGH 501082 NANCE,PEGGY L 94 HARDIE AVE S W 271 HARDIE AVE NW RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 9E055 420440-0270-01 182305-9131-01 KIN; OF GLORY MINISTRIES 779999 TOSCO MARKETING CO 742032 221 HARDIE AVE NW PPCPEKTY TAX DEPT - 9C17 RENTON WA 98055 PO BOX 52085 PHOENIX A? PSC72 420440-0275-C6 182305-9227-06 KING OF GLORY MINISTRIES 779999 MCDONALDS CORP 046/0017 740127 221 HARDIE AVE NW PO t.CX 66207 RENTON WA 98055 AMF CHARE CHICAGO IL 6066E 420440-0277-04 192305-9234-07 STCCKMYER EVA V 507777 MCDONALDS CORPORATION 429999 r'• 264 TAYLOR AVE NW P 0 BOX 66207 AMF O'HARE (.• RENTON WA 98055 CHICAGO IL 6C666 420440-0279-02 • 182305-9237-04 PORTER GOLDIE 0477 BURKHEIMER FAMILY L.L.0 THE819999 il 263 HARDIE NW 1326 5TH AVE STE 70P RENTON WA 98055 SEATTLE WA 98101 420440-0281-08 214400-0855-02 • BENDER V J 601276 KING OF GLORY MINISTRIES 77999Q 260 TAYLOR AVE NW 221 HARDIE AVE NW PENTON WA 98055 REi4TGN WA 98055 420440-0233-06 420440-0261-02 1 KANGAS MARTIN F 409999 MATHEWSON/KRANZ 041532 268 TAYLOR AVE NW C/O KRANZ BRENT J*ROSIN A RENTON WA 98055 271 RAINIER AVE N t RENTON WA 96055 420440-0340-07 420440-1262-01 i KING OF GLORY MINISTRIES 779999 MATHEWSON/KRANZ 101196 221 HARDIE AVE NW 2271 RAINIER AVE N RENTON WA 98055 RENTCN WA 93055 420440-0345-02 420440-0263-00 1 KING OF GLORY MINISTRIES 779999 POPE LACHLAN 709935 221 HARDIE AVE NW 11311 19TH AVE SE ::C-227 PENTON hA 98055 EVERETT WA 98208 (Attach additional sheets, if necessary) i (Continued) NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER Applicant Certification I, l00En7 , hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property (Print Name) owners and their addresses were obtained from: ❑ City of Renton Technical Services Records ❑ Title Company Records ® King County Assessors Records \`\`\``%%%tl„IIrllrrrr�'/''' � - l �?!1 �� Date /I. `INC.� "49l Signed - 6 ; %(Applicant) _ �° NOTot, 11, •_ NOTARY = 4, '°UeLIc ATTESTED: ubscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and f$ ° ngton, residing t on the ��� day of �'''. U. ',�rrNrrlll I I ``` 0 Signed (Notary Public) ****For City of Renton Use**** CERTIFICATION OF MAILING I, Si Vii441 hereby certify that notices of the proposed application were mailed to (,City Employee) each listed property owner on4161:411 . Signed Date: ' NOTARY ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing at ¢ 9 -, on the 1d day of •y,-a_. , 19 . Signed ?Yi' rt listprop.doc REV 07/95 MARILYN KAMCHEFF 2 COMMISSION EXPIRES 6/29/99 420440-0265-08 182305-9111-05 RANDLES MATTHEW J+MARIAN L+159999 VALA[)E JERRY L E. CLOCAGH 501082 NANCE ,PEGGY L 94 HARDIE AVE S W 271 HARDIE AVE NW RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 III 420440-0270-01 182305-9131-01 KING OF GLORY MINISTRIES 779999 TOSCU MARKETING CO 742032 221 HARDIE AVE NW PROPERTY TAX DEPT - DC17 RENTON WA 98055 PO BOX 52085 PHOENIX AZ 85072 I 420440-0275-06' 182305-9227-06 KINr, OF GLORY MINISTRIES 779999 MCDONALDS CORP 046/0017 740127 221 HA DIE AVE NW PO BOX 66207 i RENTON WA 98055 AMF OHARE CHICAGO IL 60666 420440-0277-04 182305-9234-07 STOCKMYER EVA V 507777 MCDONALDS CORPORATION 429999 264 TAYLOR AVE NW P 0 BOX 66207 AMF O'HARE RENTON WA 98055 CHICAGO IL 60666 420440-0279-02 182305-9237-04 ` PORTER GOLDIE 0477 BURKHEIMER FAMILY L.L.0 THE819999 263 HARDIE NW 1326 5TH AVE STE 708. RENTON WA 98055 SEATTLE WA 98101 420440-0281-08 214480 0855_OZ BENDER V J 601276 KING OF GLORY MINISTRIES 779999 260 TAYLOR AVE NW 221 HARDIE AVE NW RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 420440 0 283 06 4 20440-0261-02 KANGAS MARTIN F 409999 tIATHEWSON/KRANZ 041532 I 268 TAYLOR AVE NW C/O KRANZ BRENT J+ROBIN A PENTON WA 98055 271 RAINIER AVE N 1 RENTON WA 98055 42 0440-0340-07 420440-0262-01 KING OF GLORY MINISTRIES 779999 MATHEWSON/KRANZ 101186 li 221 HARDIE AVE NW 2271 RAINIER AVE N RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 420440-0345-02 420440-0263-00 KING OF GLORY MINISTRIES 779999 POPE LACHLAN 709935 221 HARDIE AVE NW 11311 19TH AVE SE ;,D-227 PENTON WA 98055 EVERETT WA 98208 ill 0 il GN`Y 0 n r NOTICE OF APPLICATION PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DATE: JUNE 08,1998 A Master Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NUMBER/NAME: LUA-98-093,ECF/MINKLER DEMOLITION DESCRIPTION: The applicant seeks environmental review of the demolition of three buildings. Building#1 is a one story 2,700 sq.ft.building.Building#2 is a 1,200 sq.ft.metal gas station building. Building#3 Is a 6,400 sq.ft.one-story cement block building. GENERAL LOCATION: 110 Renton Avenue NW STUDIES REQUIRED/OR AVAILABLE: NO PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review(ECF) • Comments on the above application must be submitted In writing to Mr.Mark R.Pywell,AICP,Project Manager, Development Services Division,200 Mill Avenue South,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on July 20,1998. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail,contact JO Mr.Pywell at(425)277-5586. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. tti PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION ,• DATE OF APPLICATION: JUNE 03,1998 I NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: JUNE 08,1998 I DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: JUNE 08,1998 rtsLi w :� •.� Ro r . rt� ' Y� '4.x, .,, .,..,.,___. ,... 4,.. .7elf.....,00 $.-,,,,,,i*, ,,,t .,- I 1.,mits- ,......L.,...: , .z,,,4".p„,r.,,,.. 74-:-...---v..ig 0,,,k2,-,i,,,,...;,:tol•- ,011,:.:1 ,,4 ,.1, ._,...--ifw _. •, k. tpLF‘K ^ o i , L rs 4 1 � iv� i • j • I III { .I /x f '1::::=1,0,7 ..�. r. A4 �. CERTIFICATION � l I, /l/11' /I4,J '+T( , hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document were posted by me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on d c)A,cf IC;/9 I� • Signed: ___ %/4 ATTEST: Subcribed and sworn before me, a Nortary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing cn ,,-, , on the 6}G,•. day of Qt - /y V • `�) 4�'? a�G . MARILYN KAMCHEFF COMMISSION EXPIRES 6/29/99 i i! GtiCY 0 a ,,.. ti- 7)....,.. NOTICE OF APPLICATION PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DATE: JUNE 08, 1998 A Master Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NUMBER/NAME: LUA-98-093,ECF/MINKLER DEMOLITION DESCRIPTION: The applicant seeks environmental review of the demolition of three buildings. Building#1 is a one story 2,700 sq.ft.building. Building#2 is a 1,200 sq.ft. metal gas station building. Building#3 is a 6,400 sq.ft.one-story cement block building. GENERAL LOCATION: 110 Renton Avenue NW STUDIES REQUIRED/OR ��n AVAILABLE: /4 PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review(ECF) Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Mr. Mark R. Pywell, AICP, Project Manager, Development Services Division,200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055, by 5:00 PM on July 20, 1998. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact Mr. Pywell at (425) 277-5586. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION DATE OF APPLICATION: JUNE 03, 1998 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: JUNE 08, 1998 DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: JUNE 08, 1998 r_ it E, P C YOKl A� i _Av �'�a ID APPcox. 1998C0 ft. ...2, _:C.I 'oe I t I+_ ! -II+,Ha 26r ssrr� .sly` la f � _ f` 5� t j I ® ---- c1 O _I li' �'d U .. _AA V I Pr t — J r !Ed % , YI 44 . I ,, y r r �'II p'`r f!4' _-,.'-• i i, .CCiY�il16 I��is.3, .1/ ' !'-..,2• 4,-_T= : r � i , 9t. I f'.1."4 . 110- *,' ", ,„ 111 f� 91 \.I v .' Irr' Ka ' j,N V',11 IBleck67 NH.Latind Ink•W-hing Plat, to plat f •' Irmo(recorded m Volume 6 of Plata page'/O,tccadc of King County,Washington III '' • `\' • '# �- `''•�-4L.�,�anent that portion conveyed for Renton Ave.Daemon,and half of the vacated South 1 a- •Ulp Srcet adjoining l II it GENMALOT.DOC ..___`_. CIT. OF RENTON %. L NAL I Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator June 8, 1998 Mr. Robert Minkler Minkler Enterprises 1701 Kennewick Avenue NE Renton, WA 98056 SUBJECT: Minkler Demolition Project No. LUA-98-093,ECF Dear Mr. Minkler: The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on June 30, 1998. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. Please contact me, at (425) 277-5586, if you have any questions. Sincerely, 97 ., Mark R. P I, AICP Project Manager ACCPTLTR DOC 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer "11111111111101111. 1110 . • . Crr�' OF Re.r�TON bLVEI.OPMMEPN SERVICES (:)IVISIO(J • ::<..;::.:,::;;.:•::::;:<.: NI�4,STER APPLIC;ATMO1 PROPERTY OWNERS) PROJECT INFORMATION Note: If'there is!more than one;fegal owner, please attach an additional notarized Maaster Application for'each owner PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: NAME: l ' �N XL- E r� EN rr�F',D/sc—s All/yA)L E e ,D EiyoL / T/6rN f�4 apii 7- A , /t'l/ E PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION: II C, a'4 AA ADDRESS: • 5 Z. On/4-2 / /YE atm,. coo R N `t n' 'A/ TO N - '� iP4/N/iE,? CITY: ZIP: KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): TELEPHONE NUMBER: EXISTING LAND USE(S): y�S q 7 - 8 .3 y 4 US' cs,o e 9' i4 e, %o /%1-/r>' APPLICANT (if, othe(than owner) k,./L I, /9b. vA AA/ 7// ? PROPOSED LAND USES: NAME: 4/R// COMPANY (if applicable): EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: /717 • ADDRESS: PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): CITY: ZIP: EXISTING ZONING: • f TELEPHONE NUMBER: PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): CONTACT PERSt�I 4/61 r )3F/° EVELOPMENT PLAN.' � ; Je SITE AREA (SQ. FT. OR ACREAGE): CITY OF RENTON NAME: /'///VA! Er� �// } 5�0 ``� 7` ` JUN 0 1998 COMPANY(if applicable): PROJECT VALUE: RECEIVED /`1/N/�LFR EE�r /��'/?/3Es 37 P . / YI ADDRESS: IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? /7d/ 4-YEA/A(E w/ e 711 e • e CITY: ZIP: 95/Y y-D X 9 Q Go s� IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY I / /]t / O SENSITIVE AREA? TELEPHONE NUMBER: --ya s - as - a sys I TYPE' OF APPLICATION & FEES Check,all application types that apply--City staff will determine saes ... _ANNEXATION $ SUBDIVISION: _ COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT $ — REZONE $ _ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ — SPECIAL PERMIT $ _ SHORT PLAT $ —TEMPORARY PERMIT $ _TENTATIVE PLAT $ — CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ _ PRELIMINARY PLAT $ — SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ _ FINAL PLAT $ _ GRADE & FILL PERMIT $ (NO. CU. YDS: ) PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $_ _ VARIANCE $ (FROM SECTION: 1 _ PRELIMINARY _WAIVER $ _ FINAL _WETLAND PERMIT $ _ ROUTINE VEGETATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ _ BINDING SITE PLAN $ SHORELINE REVIEWS: _ SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ _ CONDITIONAL USE $ _ VARIANCE $ _ EXEMPTION $No Charce _ ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $4EBU.. REVISION $ AFFIDAVIT OP OWNERSHIP I, (Print Name)ROt 1,(. t.kit k0(.r a declare that I am(please check one)_the owner of the property involved in this application,_the authorized representative to act for the property owner(please attachyrowfu94 au orization), and that the foregoing statements and answers herein ��` to the best of my knowledge and belief. contained and the information herewith submitted are in all resp�Gt�twetaLd yftfty� g Vim '°N �'''• _._ _ o . ri A , NOT44 i$T: ''3 scribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and �6 T I'. IVl t L11-C.h't- _ r. "-•.,tbr t14e;Staff f ti/K residing at (Name of Owner/Representative) AOBLJ , on the t rday of v- m , was++►+ ,,, (Signature of Owner/Representative) f,444411,11 „\r‘ (Sign ture of Notary Public) (This section to be completed by City Staff ) City File Number b� 3 A AAD BSP CAPS CAP U CPA CU'A CU H LLA MHP ;.FPUD F.,P!PP:R ;•RUMP SA-A SA"H SHPL A SHPL-H SP SM< SME TP V ' '� B V" H W TOTAL FE ES; $; •� TOTAL POSTAGE PROVIDED $ 4/r . MASTERAP.DOC REVISED 8/97 LEaAt- D E9c/',pr/oN of:: -57 TL (Block 62,N.H. Latimer's Lake Washington Plat, according to plat thereof recorded in Volume 6 of Plats, page 70, records of King County, Washington, except that portion conveyed for Renton Ave. Extension, and half of the vacated South 131st Street adjoining.; • /VI/T/"7'^' .....: .:�:::ra:::c:::o:::r.:.::.:::.:5>::::•.:•;:::.::::...::::::: :.::::o:::;;:::::::::::::.:::�::•.::•..:::...:>::::.::.:>:•.:;::.::.... � :,;;::n'.�.:;::.y;'."' :?i:ii:i:i:<�3#i?i;i ;<ir'?i:i:i: i'• � ...� .: iI( Wf...:. E PM'E MASTER APPLICA `IO PROPS TY OWNER(S) PROJECT INFORMA'YION .. • Note If<there is:(more than one legal owner,please attach en addi.tionalr' -notarized Master'Application for each owner PROJECTJEj OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: NAME: (f(IeL � �l E � j&/Z /��['/ SES l 7 /!g1 /41E, OL-/%1 I TPa N Ree // T 2 //NI L E PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION: I 0 / /U/, ADDRESS: / 4 !' t 7D/ /E(Y/v t t-/ /C K ,4 vim'- N.Lc, ('A/.w-_. Co'Aro/t o,c R6/Wi To'v Avg . ¢ /f,4 /NtEle ,2-fvc' CITY: ZIP: KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT MBER(S): N T6'N �gDS� �a© yye - oY.C-5- o7 TELEPHONE NUMBER: EXISTING LAND USE(S): 17125--- ?o V A S S Users cA o 79 y /4P` /12EP/4/ . APPLICANT (if:;ather than:',owner) "'/ ts ETL Y V c /`/ T � �c7. PROPOSED LAND USES: NAME: COMPANY(if applicable): EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: C'/(1/1 ADDRESS: PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): UNX/VawN CITY: ZIP: EXISTING ZONING: • TELEPHONE NUMBER: PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): CONTACT PERSON SITE AREA (SQ. FT. OR ACREAGfPE./ NAME: E� P/�,� /f D 88/Y fl(/V A'( E/ /� F= r7)/of EN LA..�,,,f��� 'MN COMPANY(if applicable): PROJECT VALUE: �fY �.. /9 v�0 8 /`7 //A(Z- El? 6N7-6it' /°A1/sE5 VED ADDRESS: IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? t70 / /EN N E / rr'c /9-vz N,E. ✓�, CITY: ZIP: 9 Q 67 s'C �/ IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY �/ Y T O ,X� �r� SENSITIVE AREA? TELEPHONE NUMBER: /V G L/as -a; F - ,25 ys .LEGAL DESCRIPTI• .____ 01= PROPERTY. (Attach spilrat� ..aet rl ricessryj ... . • _ ;Block 62,N.H. Latimer's Lake Washington Plat, according to plat :thereof recorded in Volume 6 of Plats, page 70, records of King County, Washington, except that portion conveyed for Renton Ave. Extension, and half of the vacated South '131 st Street adjoining. TYPE OP APPLICATION & FEES Check all application types that apply C%tystaff will deermineuiees. _ANNEXATION $ SUBDIVISION: _ COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT $ _ REZONE $ _ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ _ SPECIAL PERMIT _$ SHORT PLAT $ _TEMPORARY PERMIT $ _TENTATIVE PLAT $ _ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ _ PRELIMINARY PLAT $ _ SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ _ FINAL PLAT $ _ GRADE & FILL PERMIT $ (NO. CU. YDS: ) PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ _ VARIANCE $ (FROM SECTION: ) _ PRELIMINARY _WAIVER $ _ FINAL _WETLAND PERMIT $ _ ROUTINE VEGETATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ _ BINDING SITE PLAN $ SHORELINE REVIEWS: — SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ _ CONDITIONAL USE $ _VARIANCE $ J/ _ EXEMPTION $No Charsae ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ 46{. REVISION $ AFFIDAVIT.OF OWNERSHIP' I, (Print Name)a4e1 ��•�tivlct z declare that I am (please check one)�he owner of the property involved in this application,_the authorized representative to act for the property owner(please attach proof of authorization), and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in al`��pstlg11d Latil,e and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. ``\ \\`�� �1CK!L.I..--d f•Is; � p `Lp'�9. A IES Subscribed and sworn to before me a Notary Public, in and 26�`i4 t 3-, Ivy, 1 (\A y LE NOrp for the S to of `UP( residing at r�>" ��� — , on the be day of • (Name of Owner/Representative) = ' 'OUetiC 19 )? , •1')`—t---Q01i' .kjil /'- A% — (Signature of 0' ner/Representative) y PA t`t`���r illint""""'t't (Signature of Notary Public) Staff:'`>< > .;:<<>:°«>:` > < €' ;>< '< IThis section to be completed by City ! City File Number A AAD BSP GAPS CAP U SPA CUJ A .;m H LLA ,;,!.!0„,,,,O,,,::„InallitilitE.1;,.:,:,..:fligA: MHP. FPUD FP PP R RVMP' SA A SA H SH:PL A .SHPL H SP.: SM :SM> TP V A V B V H ? TOTAL FEES 5, �I" TOTAL POSTAGE PROVIDED $ ! it MASTERAP.DOC REVISED 8/97 MINKLER ENTERPRISES (A PARTNERSHIP) Robert J. Minkler and Robert A. Minkler Owners 1701 Kennewick Ave N.E. Renton, Washington 98056 Phone : 425-228-2545 PROJECT NARRATIVE NAME OF PROJECT: MINKLER DEMOLITION SIZE AND LOCATION OF SITE: Approximately 51, 200 Sq. Feet (Assessors Figures) , Located on the Northwest corner of the intersection of Rainier Ave. an Renton Ave. in the City of Renton. Buildings #1 & #3 are one story cement block buildings. #1 is a700 sq ft . #3 is 6400 sq ft . #2 is an old metal gas station, and is 1200 sq ft . All building are vacant with the exception of a portion of the North building now occupied by Dukes Transmission, which is to be vacated by July 1, 1998 . The most recent occupants were Used car lots and automotive repair. Future use of the property is unknown after demolition. We are prepared to have the property inspected for environmental contaminates, and remedy if found. Minkler Enterprises: Robert Minkler Robert A. Minkler OFi�'+ENT PlJG pE� CITY OF RENTON Jul p 1999 RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the. quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or"does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. D VELOF r _ . CITY OF REM CJlrl JUN 03 1998 RECEIVED Environmental Checklist A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: M/HNL F�1 ` ) fl LC r/©hl 2. Name of applicant: /c/m/RL E /V TEl f/?/5'E) (4 PA? j7vEfr-s'N/i) AD6'ERT- r/. /`I/Nr<"L El? fee' T 4-E . ti//NAIL E� 3. A dress and phone number of applicant and contact person: j 7 / ��iv�/ w /�c/( A-ceE'_ /yam , , /�'EA(Toni/ w,�- 9 ©S-,‘ P171. Nt y.as --aa P — P5 1/5 4. Date checklist prepared: 5-/?.//?(' 5. Agency requesting checklist: /5C-P o E(e T 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): t $ $c7 /`/ 4S /-'4-7 /trfr / s / SSVEp 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. /V T' A T 4FSE / 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. A/ E A A/gPv/1/ 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. lJN /-lNew-/v 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. ,D /"1a z-. / .3/{ 3 g: /L 2 //\(.61s' e a c/�Nc ,ins L L D� �'J'� / s L E/- /1 ! rfovG/- 2 Environmental Checklist k 62,N.H. Latimer's Lake Washington Plat, according to plat hereof recorded in Volume 6 of Plats, page 70, records of King County, Washington, xcept that portion conveyed for Renton Ave. Extension, and half of the vacated South 31 st Street adjoining. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and •range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area,-provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if • reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not _ required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. kacRTFp 4if N•w, ?NE!? a ,- tNTE/ZSEeT N af= Ri41N/Elt vE �lt'EN Toter ,4 jvC., REA(T-o�v� B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one ; flat, oiling,:hilly,.steep.slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) /47,/°/2 / /.104r c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. r 4 /c)/c7L - d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. N • e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. No ? - /P/ f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. G g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 4 NE / 7 /01PE5EA/ r t /ter E /N. UsC o 11i'oie°ER Tt / s UN/(Al© u' Al • 3 Environmental Checklist h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: E 2. AIR • a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission or odor that•may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. teti c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: NaN�' 3. WATER a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. /S/ 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. 5) • Does the proposal lie within a 100-year flood plain? If so, note location on the site plan. 4 Environmental Checklist 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. b. Ground Water: 1) - Will ground water be.withdrawn,.or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. ,/ 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other. sources, if any (for,example: Domestic sewage;aindustrial containing..the--following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general•size'ofthe-system;the-number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Ng t • Ci 77- c. Water Runoff(including storm water): STel?ti 9 ',4 INS 4 Avi4/L4 f&L C 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and .method of.collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known): Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters, If so, describe. ,3,, r`> dIfA/Af 2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: /t/ (2 / /C 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs grass / ,7 /Y C pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? 5 Environmental Checklist c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Ao/UC A > / // T7Nl 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on-or.nearthe:site-:or•are known to be on or near the site: (see next page) '/V&— Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other • Fish: bass, salmon,trout, herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. --b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. V t( G c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: ll�d r A /`)/c'L- / C' A C G 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 6 Environmental Checklist a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: /17L b. Noise 1) 'What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? /v p/yE 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example::traffic,-construction; operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. fVelV� 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: /v-E 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. / /X c. Describe any structures on the site. ( E/tit ry T ez R9 MET-,� � sr h T/J/ d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? r / 7/7 1 %f//N 7 Environmental Checklist g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. N0, i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? (7o N 5 j. Approximately how manyppeeo��ould the completed project displace? k. : Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: /Sl o r" A /"/'L - . I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing=and_-projected land uses and plans, if any: /S API) e • 9. HOUS a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. /ty 0-N7-- A PF2 , b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: 10. AESTHETICS . ' ` afiede--rr--ja -a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: 8 Environmental Checklist 11. LIGHT AND GLARE ty ' g lact a. What type of light or glare will tosal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? c. - What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? ____. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: 2:— RECREATION dc-; g 4 a. What designated and i ortf rrfial recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: 11 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION t e—ct:--,--- , a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or . cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: 1 1 1�4:,, TRANSPORTATION j_4_07,1 a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. 9 Environmental Checklist b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Lz c. How many parking spaces would the corn leted project have? How many would the project eliminate? d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets,-or_improvements..to-existing.roads or. streets, not including driveways?_ If so, generally:describe.(indicate whether public or private? e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate.,vicinity of) :water,:rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. 4'� • f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated _by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would 9ccur. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. 16. UTILITIES a. Circle u 'Ries frrentl avails le at the site: elec ri natural gas water refuse servic telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, her-- t 10 e Environmental Checklist b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. C. SIGNATURE %r - .I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is.understood that the :lead agency may rwithdraw any declaration of non- significance that it might.issue in reliance upon this•checklist-should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: .._ tl//y HL E 5A✓ / E • Name Printed: / r C" a G fit' r fr/ //V (LE J07X Date: // / ! e 11 Environmental Checklist D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEETS FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (These sheets should only ;;be used for!'actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs. You do not need to fill out these sheets for project actions.) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to.water,,emissions to-air,_production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, flood plains, or prime farmlands? Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: 12 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISIC WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMEN i FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS • LAND.USE PERMIT'.SUBMITTAL WAIVED MODIFIED,; COMMENTS: REQUIREMENTS BY; BY Calculations, Survey, • Drainage ControlPlan z , • Drainage Report 2 Elevations, Architectural3nNoa + < Elevations, Grading 2 Existing Covenants';(Recorded Copy)a Existing Easements (Recorded Copy) 4 Flood:Plain Map, if applicable 4 Floor Plans 3AND4 trByIt't" ... .. .. . . ...... . . • Geotechnical Report2ANDs • Grading Plan, Conceptual 2 Grading Plan Detailed 2 King County Assessor's Map Indicating Site 4 LandscapingPlan;Conceptual.• • Legal Description 4 Listof Surrounding Property Owners 4 Mailing Labels for Property Owners 4 Map<of Existing Site Conditions 4 Master Application Form 4 Monument Cards`;(one per monument) , Parking, Lot Coverage & Landscaping Analysis 4 PIan;Reductions (PMTs) 4 Postage 4 Public Works Approval Letter2 • • _ Title Report or Plat Certificate 4 Topography:Map (5':contours)s Traffic Study 2 Tree CuttingNegetation Clearing Plan 4 . • Utilities Plan, Generalized 2 Wetlands Delineation ........ .L ........ .. . . ... .. Wetlands Planting Plan 4 G Wetlands Study 4 This requirement may be waived by: �^ 1. Property Services Section PROJECT NAME: f4 i fII%1-(iv Qf/4NLl7 /0 h Y7 2. Public Works Plan Review Section 3. Building Section DATE: 5 '/19 4. Development Planning Section h:\division.s\develop.ser\dev.plan.ing\walveryls e /N .4 DkMoc ! TidN. G,oe 1 sxi sr/NC7 p • CEMENT 171-vcK / -'l --1 May26, 1998 - lc r cA140P '� , fer b • 6104.Toes. GYET7-4o � "9 4r /a-0 P .S' , ,. , a g r' � 2' C)-` ',,,'::N.. C'''' jey- 1:.":73 .. ,,, i ,..)„.-:': ...- .:,,:,..; NI 1-\-° et‘ e 611,91tat,c,ctcv.i6:koip JBlock 62, N.H. Latimer's Lake Washington Plat, according to plat thereof recorded in Volume 6 of Plats, page 70, records of King County, Washington, except that portion conveyed for Renton Ave. Extension,and half of the vacated South 131 st Street adjoining. — _ ytaLasti...........,„1.941T/d1/1, --� ! �� s = r� • t NO R- g /TE PthN4c 6y �EDEtrogISf�F� Ffb (& i s TIN(o CEMErrrR�aeiCi � 3 UM- I T7E klko , if7. May26, 19984-FT ,/ �.. SI - lc r . . heATF/ P~PO 70 E eEMoVE , Ts Lu Rem b .J Bioc T,BE N. O`r'yaK'1s o � '- 1 CA /oZ00 � SFr Z C- 4 �P• W a t . / ti ey ( .c v P • ' 5 0* ;I t..‘ 'Block 62, N.H. Latimer's Lake Washington Plat, according to plat thereof recorded in Volume 6 of Plats, page 70, records of King County, Washington, except that portion conveyed for Renton Ave. Extension, and half of the vacated South 131 st Street adjoining. CITY OF RENTON APPLICATION FOR SEWER SERVICE _� Date_ ......_._._..-...._._.... _•_•___• S;......._...._..._...._...._......._._..... 19 64 gi[ .,./e r 5_.._,...- hereby make application for Sewer Service for the premises located at . 1; /� — > �.. Wit..N_ s�..Z_ ... .z-ki/j A.,--/../_!!_ �J 7i> _f�t " • on Lot No—_—................ Block No Addition ....._....__.._._.__.._...._......._._...._. ---.....-.. • • or property description: _______................. .._...._.-.._.. .._._...._...._........._...._...._..-._._._...:......._ - The Sewer is to be used for_......__...._...._._._. C��A"..2 .:tom c-.•E:)-- ..._...._..... purposes, and •.---_....__...._......_ ....._..__--..__.. agree to pay the rates now or hereafter in effect for such service and comply with all the rules and regulations as set forth in Ordinance to be adopted regarding the use of such service and the care of plumbing fixtures. Signed _........_._._ , J Sizeof Pipe .� Kin• d•-••---_•— —•-••--••••. _.._............................_.........._..__.._ Sewer laid by_—...1 e> k C - F_. Date __-.•._ Sewer turned in_..-:.---_.._______ • • ♦� r} • � r � • ..,_bc.... • Nam- sZG/ a� ,, b� lh �' •cry."...;:::„..:____ 1,4 v o �oL �� d t 'N 5 `7 ! yzj „1 `N`�kO ^.�i ! , ; .ON ry a j • \ ry G ors '42'7 ge/ e:.e� .„ ri„F' 7 - ..• ,- ! ,..•.,fir , ! Nw •rn sr,-..-- s6a o s� nn ar gsi,- ..•.••.' -... ' ,._ „" ''''1_ •r/NI' ...... . �,"' I7J_ 1 LYE 7 r 7 �,. �_ • - -- - °= lvllhtr'LF/? C)F/fO - lT1(/V / I-''-t- 1 43 7r0 ,,,-,.... : !,.edilli i i e„,...,,,_ : i 1_ . - KAG‘ _ II " A ! ;I Ali a J t7 7 '%• 7 4. •. •.%io .�+ i EaTr[ (((/// 1" :' "" rt; -- -- 'r : � = I t Approx . =40 ft . 11_- h �,11 1. •�_,•/�, 7 M �r VI +,7 3: ...2.. ��, ,, • -1- May 26, 1998 'w-T••,-__� =L't.. '• mil •«J 7 Nw 3RD K _ "7 S 129 Sr z••nr• . ® {\ /j'T//•^ Urz.• J,.S�• 1 w t ��=,a ra`' 7 .... ......... .r,- a a� ' •• ' ,• r l./'I ! r"•. • • r ,.J- I zl�;,n t 1 /1 aa- '• •~ - '°•,turoi i: t ;i I 1 ,\. ,`O f 1. : ' > K. s/PfAjp , •'%6a� �•ta. ' �A...`'�.• ° rJ1 t +P Io�` ^• -i _•( a t�L •/�i i( ~ 1•a �C/ •-a•z_t•s++� • I CO C c. 0. ',Lti;__` - 1Igna i - _ 3N0 n y 2 , 1 g it .130~ T�v tr�A/' iw e� ► �7 i •aa _ ,--- YY 40 •y. :� t -. y• a 7, �7.1 •7taf j rt 1 - Y n �tj (}° r o. ,r.:: ... • : ., '' I A se 3 7 j 1 !+`! w' :,. lj a- �.>i �• 1 �•`,•,jli 1� //�• 7 m ,I[ ..\ � 6, ~A'li I__--_- ---�-.r.,- 1� �`�I 0 rLl tr,i 4 i * 4p... , ,.,..- , ......a., .... v • - 7-- , i .:: . ./ . I'r '0 :: ---\''' • 0.... • Er?MI k : Ap ,„4„, . ✓J r s• I� i :7 . ' Q fr ��� tIt ��+Nw 2N0 K .... ..•.., •. '% �I /4111111M66111le ''• . -.. ..%` ; � a' ; `z i e4J ' � '� 11A14 �� 'I i ,1f7 Sr! �• ,•, ! --- r . I : t ; � _�.1, . d �Y ` a .1,1..,... ,7-ii, t = A:\ !..,, ,s \• [ iH -�•w '-_1.— NW PNO ...... •... .......ew `C�1 ... y.:�• � • •wry • _,a ,IJI.Nf •I . •. .. .,•.�. T ._ .., ;_ i ' sr . _'�1]ar rl ' r+•• t- 17 I ' (;.../ I y • ,- ♦- l 1 Li____I1 '".. ........ • Z J+•, " �• _ r—I 1llrctSr --,, :,-. •1 ► r••,•J ?• 1! ao .SI ..'1� w g7 L t �,1 .1 t aa` f1 �. _� 2 14 �° 1 rj,•\: ; ,;'° yya rluulcuM ��/�. d .e c 7 t +f t ��t� ! Gi. e�,, 3'r I • 'rytf Ir•r) Jc. t 1- •:•,_ •✓; 1 I. • I ! 1 I i .. z - ,fo G'f17� + ��•�• :.J • ,D ! 4Fi ° o zq:e- IIN f•:::,J \ +� V y '•�• .� U ts s ,pig �� :.3.n �•' _\ _ .. ('9,p1 •�' • M• J f••V ael• ,J01 , i} _- ,"• �� a +.••" ,••• -7 3p ,+'� ���J ti-�„�. / i L ,re I 1-:F'...., _ ,.J » •e s y� $ •. c+ I I t"`1 ••y nS le Ai ..O \` .:% ' .••• ! r. + a1 x�_-- �.% I f• I \ 7Pa. • WI• , r--..nOWN- 4 _ ,... '. - ..... a•t� ;..1 -. i- �e.-.r.6._- •�•- _ „a•� '�4 ., I ''••Ri' iw'• fir- Zt, ••p` , t3�/!D(L1+�3-`OO 7. % - - > - • \ / ::,•• 13 S ° cam.., I"1 • �::-•_.r. -_'•meter. " •„e ...Ns, , /a .I.} ... �s' /�•k r. fie- I ,�B `i..4. 1 .'�.. ]*\ fiir •I :l ./1 , i • �!'• a ., , 1 f - ------- '*oaie�sr=• tr i•.• -�• _ .-n �� I 4N I '.••.i • :sw ,icro•u ti'!1. •'l a: t•> _L_ _ • - • I `! \,' .. L 't . ,,.? a, • n LL:wr'• • 1• .10 ' - a -4• p' • , -\Ir$ Y �' 7 .. '' � j IP • • -+- 1/ .•• "Od r• • 1 ,°• • P Y/~i•7 tl �1 . ( H...�• / :4-_, L+J 1 Block 62, N.H. Latimer's L ;_I ake Washington Plat, according to plat • �I Wf `L,•' \ SF'zNe sr thereof recorded in Volume 6 of Plats, page 70, recordsKing County,I : of ounty ,,•• except that 'portion conveyed for Renton Ave. Extension, and half of the vacated South ;;, 1 • -. "� ' • 131st Street adjoining. **************************************************************** City of Renton WA Reprinted: 06/03/98 15 : 12 Receipt **************************************************************** Receipt Number: R9803377 Amount : 411.52 06/03/98 15 : 12 Payment Method: CHECK Notation: #1178 MINKLER Init : LMN Project # : LUA98-093 Type: LUA Land Use Actions Parcel No: 420440-0355 Site Address : 110 RENTON AV NW Total Fees : 411 . 52 This Payment 411 . 52 Total ALL Pmts : 411 . 52 Balance: . 00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 000 . 345 . 81 . 00 . 0007 Environmental Review 400 . 00 000 . 05 . 519 . 90 .42 . 1 Postage 11. 52