Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
LUA99-105
KW NM.•SITE STA]ISTELS LKrY DESCRIPTION I.DUNI!.Wa�xa 97 5].m J 6 91WTT M aWmm u•5r1 oiG Winn 2.CONING- N 1.10 rm0iliRzo 1 ana 415 M0 N9%E Tr SIN,m[ r>•S yr. 4Ru xNM CITY a 9M1p5 W.In n xrlc.5rxrt OFPEAS,I. .9mttKKa wlaaaS.r1011 20.I10 wr DIP.•x'1 s RIM 321.902 Sr II 0.ES1 .I 5 SYRT 11.KTN• E. ,51 FOOTPRINT,98.1Y Sr TM LQVERA2 O1 TOTAL RI t I rt11N KU, COO Sr7. Q p p3 TYPE tt9SIiSICATION, 0 Y M SPRINKLE. i.0.15 On 42°l0SF T d SI-0001034 x 952 4 9 P-FACT.<axu xKlUSIxEI 010111M- ..A wI WIC,Ylnn.10...YW99 x.21.m1,12er192 i xlx 29 1' • • .1 CCM..T xwr u re2iu INN i° 01110E i e t2.CMS WILSNO ALLAt°I MN, 1 Y1000 BOl - 1 1 1 1 S 10 11 NUM a10y, N .A.APR .39'ABOVE FINISa.FEBOI S 12 x.ANUA SW COVE..ME ]0111A.10EA 121066 S r[ ...x40.ISL..MP.9.IN S F. J...YUSCAR NEM .320,rm.r.Q ECM CW COTS,Il.0 S r x 101.E.AMIYME rEmuai VI.EASE10114 A.sA S r. ppp 1 NOTE .I11E0N A Cr WK..SIRS IS aw1aD IN 1u1W.. .W]Wla wl.x IS n16.[1.1 MO IN 9E1100 ur.. N EM 07100/0 40�1001.1 WAS 12°•0.]9 Sr 4.+ 21" 'IK MS 0 1M•' ICINITY MAP ' .MI1E..TS All I.1aB tS x x Cr6 TA Cr6.aA 11Txlx ll WQamN°19PIG 101r IS awiH LxOYAI( NOON p 1 mp xou �n $t • I ' (( ill e OWING R w • '—s°"" m eo14 IC. 91s Jx2590 ! , - . l xT laao ws.amlo.l•6 I i' .xE •d` -I ®V 1 - '�! r11 2v.m.o•..s - --- -- _' .en,.o•.rs. gg 0.3 - }x I • y.,-} k to lg I} ' I., r}'I. "I. /} Pi, k I� }>r Y�'1} — p 1 _I v v v v�a� • v v v v �•� .N$ 1 1 1 v Ix1••wrvm• IC.•' 1� .� • i t':rue I tale \� FROP05ED BUILgINCs FOOTPRIN7y 98,15Y •F. 1 ! — a= I iI .11 _„� morrowRec.ie W 11 ' MEZZ.: 8,00©•F. — • Nil WO MIT MOW A-'•1 1 10Fi,T52•F. — r E--1 I;1I . I 1 .. rt II FW+ Ift��"p1pMOW ` 1,.�j r 2.."•R i i MU f a aln a71M. f ar9a s' p �/ ,.mrw..n I (�-I C/l I WV IFII 1 r� o� lil • +T 11 J ` 1! • • r �� a a � n �� n n _., _ Q+ r'Z. I II Lit 11 A;r ]` 7 iC:I TA 11 i EO+ 1 M �1IIM� rr-- 11 1 1 M' ,'IM r N , r W .M _ z •— - ., m.0.mlr•. - E p. W 4RV.K I .•9ut1 .010I•r Alps/ - - 0 — =,.R...01' "-.,-. j J•z LIND AVENUE R — — — — — — _ - - 99 6 O E o - o rnlc eaw,c .� ; cei lsuw. wo.,,E„RrF • ���I Z Z M E.■ �-\ Iunnnli, .� LINp gveN F', p-1• C4 --- n NM .1xa•.n..ees. ••�' j --- N /4 1�•• aao•....� o SITE PLAN m I I I f SD-1 • ....., e R1 , I W 1 CC. 1 -, 10/19/99 01945 urn C.\Cn0\983000Lr\50-1 dwg =--a --G— 181I, - t� -,�4W V t '.,- ,., -.....1.-_-- ....i iiiiii!!..•k ..____', ii":171:2:14:7.1!!''72::''''T'r EIMMLNIMMINIMINIMIIIII cm ` w-IIEx YARIG—�� - ---=n�t_ / D ��.- 1.1= .. .,w,.M:r . ,• •N �__.. �,1 NUE at « , I , Ir."' CARP.o I •■ e-:9 - KU d s;Femc_e ux - _ —_ = bYro �f� _N 0_.,VE �_ Isw m�. _1,1.1 <_' SIDEWALK -?— wxrto eR �e xu. r f L k .I _■`� 1NL 5>' TO BE 6.0 16.8,.�.. E- s / RELOCATED 611. [ve nx- oio [ e.OrvL \ ` �/r■1�1�Ft,..,����\ ' ,c RV:. 3 I n fiwz. - 1 si a<,6 /1�: '-�'� r�.E ' 1 3 I � ....,,..,:;,,.;,1::.....,,,........._„.., _ L- - • V/ClN/TY MAP NDi ro SLALE .! !— ''' >me eir ,�,� ~, 1 1.3 6. —��� ', ��. BENCHMARK AND DATUM et L 1 o u.s TA,'L�'0. 17' 'DPI _ �� ( E)I ST.-�' �' �� `a 1_. �V. 17. 1%. WALE TYP. `77.5 • = �. �I _ >. // • I e * -AL 1 A rall lip I yry '• HORIZONTAL DATUM P L^ A.�� • µ - r III B'. R-- _ �[� I .r -F•_R `,■A{■ __+__R__ R e+/ n>icua bT'a•RENTa+rvaO&r/9r �O 2 �� •. 1ER11LAL DATUM mmim �1!' WEI an a REN av CONTROLLING BENCHMARK an cr RENTa!9ENCHMARK No sn _ 17.5 I 'ansscLED 50uARE w cuvcwETE wAtrr �p0 1. REMOVE&'LUG 15 • K �/1 m L I 1 5.5 F£ET AES'T AND T o FEET NORTH al 16.2 18.2- 16.2. A7IHNERSNAN TD 15 0 ELEVATRIN l� ^ , = Y -:�� CQVia/R INTERVAL i FOOT %' f I LEGAL DESCR/PT/ON: �� I - PROPS ED CB i PROPO r: 15.0 15.0 150 15. I I(�T 0 1 ANp J(K SHORT PLAT NO. -1 API.,ACCORDING , -- -.. P----- ----iV-1---�---._. I lO rHE SHOPr PL1r RE TMOED UNDER TONG Ca/NTY RECORDING F/ ;o,!' I -'_ I - --- -.. - a ---_-- I T AZ A r a w ,� rva.neDs2T9Orx srvArE w THE CITY of.PENTLW,COUNTY of KING /R /•i - FF 19.0 1 I ---a LO -_3- } e-e•a r- '..: I STATE LY w0.1.k.r[w. II �%/V PROPOSED n ® q q L0OR DRAINS 190 I + GENERAL NOTES: /7 F DETENTION I" •� . TO BE CONNECTED (I' , ,POND I I PR.P•,. elnA.moA TO SANITARY SEWER DDCV OWVER: Po D737 EKLOPMENr L% ( �. 1:• W/PIV wT STREET [AND,w /6Tb! 990.TJ L- . .' [[ (ITS)929 4UI , )` 1 DELELOPER: PACIFIC GULF PROPERTIES INC N 00 Str'$E I 0 . E .20 VON KAR.VAN AVE,SECOND FLOOR �'`Y�1 I �i• E TJPEACH CA 92660-2002 1■_ Y t 49)22 5000 _ _ ; I I�1 '. ' Ill is ENGINEER IREECE tr COMPANY.INC I, '- I l• �- �� T\ E%TRUDCD ,A. _ -_ _ • (Kzs zsn .ss. • PARKIN eP \`1�� rE'S,IrvC. f SURVEYOR: HDPTa!DENN4!a55'OaA 1. \ \� Rice o`ss zs uxo LOT .e ��I_. >1R0 SECLWOV K S COTTONWOOD °x (.15)811 1515 �E— ARWIECT. DAVID A•EHLE ARCHITECTS A --1RT.9 ,..—e+E"' \ 12720[A Awl DRIVE,SUITE tt8 ' r — __ __ _ _ fig Y INGTOV 9516G _ ' �_ r4�� I (106f NJ R99) CUM- In-LLAT uw'� LEGEND m■.r■ ISVES Av., __ - - PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION meow 1.1- • x ® n • ff O % T TTRREECE•COMPANY INC, • armour(Woo) P fib emwe..o oEvc[orMm eaSu[�Mns VALVEre GATE rvK ..ri aim n'n`ITI.si e- .T. rT+ R CITY O F Ea-oNar WAITS NraR q,,,a x DEPARTMENTR. oPUBLIC�wo�s POSER SEP.. El Am.,P.H.rr,r PRELIMINCR AG Y GRADING.DRAINAGE cnsln•.c o. WATER AND SANITARY SEWER PLAN Oewers r OM Wrti Oa wIERSII■n r11P11..B 51TT STATISTICSli& LEGAL PESCRIFIIM 2 BOLDING N 6.1u IPO.2. 1 2 ICBM iNOY M.93H2OSN•OIT MT RCO®PrR 1.G WPIn 1 I%. . „9' g.'s" E On a am4 COUNTY a amSUIT a ...icae IP[IENTS 1616 PO MIN.Itar 01 IEM-s', BE NIX n 6 902I39 FOBS, n.213 SF rl 1 Q 6.rP1r A. MIMI1.-r 752 SF 4X MEP.M M.SITE, Poi[NTIK MM. 8 000 SF 1 TYPE O C.IPUCTIU, ,-x 3.14146611 EI IINI Q �.. 84 8; P.16 CLASSIT.T. P-P1ICE X K ' SI_TKNTIiiII LXV44.,OIg11K W I $ • B A 4691110.X 4 S 1¢R •Y c,pL=11d1Y P_, Nlx, .0030 M.. ICI L8I R MI,Tnstlmo PUMA rQ1 {3 k k CLOP.A.,n MPE TINISTO MOP --- -- - 6 E a u a OT' .Aa 104E .1.5X5 .•P[•w4 IJ•6 S.T. IS LAMM.6011160,2P.FRONT.IMOFT CURB WI/13,63 S.F MITE. _ maN.1/4 m i - RP P.I T'LTS o.�s..1141.6 5%6.w a. NORTLI VICINITY MAP • .OP 2,I,OCPOr110RIU IFIIM Is BEM. O I 'Z r 'ff' Si jPi l vvo �1 �I T 1 �� 1 �� -- �r a. mI -0r LL t I; // MOW F1AB:.NVT i .. 7� <r 1_____,, TT�u''I ®I •___ I . , , , . . I IP: !n•r ePSSR MM., t 1 I Ir r s 1111I I x ,wll. a y1 •� -��. '" 1.} 11 lj i 9� k -RY v I} •m I « = v .1 v v�a.�Ox r—\v v v v v , I 31 �ac11a--_- I:i - — , x • uleTrc.n o ' 1 1 �� p , it !! 1 �.wB II m,� �. a -_ 1 PROPOSED BUILDING FOOTPRINT: 98,152 I.F. ; — 1 p. W 1 1 MEZZ.: 8,000•F. ! — _Ic! 'ms r I @ ..1 I06,152-F. c 1 _ 1ii ur'I�,,,'r,,,r1T �1 _______\ 1 , 1 1 .� .i •vx m mwr - ' - - - - - • - - - imnwrial — J. .mP1 1 w 1 F ..� y ° ""a + y ..'� a a ,� i = a s p �� I a y WO 3� Z 1 • x 1 I', 5 7 n EMI >. �y 7 • li €ji Ism O u I �� Icy I C� q c ..�� �, ,.,8,,,. � 7,oer..-. .y� s l • T,KPPK•.RIr..1 _ _ _ rr LIND.QVENUE1 - —,nr— -- -— — — _ _ - _� _„! " �� Q p c - -___ _.- ___.__- \".s. �? L I CPC COBB. _y ; - a%r U \\ fig, /j— 'C� ___—�.,K o .._� \ , --_____ • E.T.0.M1010.179.O.41161134 BMI:NPralcr,r...mixtP. v 4 SITE PLAN ,. � fr,m 1 co V• I I , Iw SD-1 -1 1 . I i I CO 2 �I. �1� 1 1 : 1 Ni1 _� /t p 11 Fr 'I .lam iii_.___:)1)—_ij iii� J1,amas J .- J _�II _.]: P ,M If-i5r1 , - •--V,:-4 I ET / 4114 .o.0 A- / NINAllr, , C I 0 ,A 1 A ....-----CO,..' 111 WF4' '*41111 I ,.--. . ` min mi r.ke' NEIGHBORHOOD DETAIL MAP ... .0..""..*""" _ 25'YE7LAND!REFER 25'YE,LNO EWER `\'�\, i- II SA 5PC 755 5SA ,PO 555 ,PC 555 555 5P0 5S55 '�\., -e R/ ■ _ : :-\•••E S� .� . O � sO. - � , �� �I \e1 � ,� -`..\\•• .,--,.....'•0e... .�� ,-.AO •O ,• OO4COo00o• �0..- 0. • \.0� �000 Ol`Orksv,0.o0\• e�i� 0 4!s.0 0\\�•O �� �\ � ;•�p '1.\ 50 �� �\ . efi .� � 00k.*4 . \k\ Nti: � :o 1117 ...te -v&,;, . kwe.evz,,.li 1, ce,`. 1;5��tent•wriC:1�.4, e •,cI�\ZV.Z9>,�\ee1'O,'eat\� k;\O\`et • \ ., cill - � \ S V �ac \ t2i . : ' • . \, - , ;' it,, to it,* st> IL* t> t I ` II TP, 55AS5A 751- 15A- 2EA 5R 55A ,PC 2EA 10 KA 2EA 7PC 2EA 5PN 1014A 2EA 5R1 5FC 5SA SIP7Po 2MeIM 4MA 7R. 55A 85A 2EA i ` -- • • 0 ' • 5 RI p 2 EA ` ...� DR ,,R ;. ,6S a �• �:, 4 Ff PROPOSED BUILDING PROPOSED BUILDING LLQ� 111111 `fig`R. ix IZ ?eg, ba 7PL IX • a . • e.•e. I 4. " bFe A.A. A.A.A. ALA.. ..A\ .A.All. � ro Q 54 F 25 IN, ��; ®�IIIIIII I A � orrZt .......,.inn bPJ 008 6PJ 60B OTGE I � �4RP�5O��15GB OFFr • bOB 5POB R 605 SR5UB a+re J 505 SPJ a •,0 - 22 PL i ; SEA 2EA :• •?+ .w � / �2EA2EA 2EA 2E � a A l,4 ' 3EA , ' : '' � ♦a z �I 1 I 2EA n 2EA 2EA / .... `Oi �L ,00 v 1, ' Hi 6EA �a ,�/ I l CI go ��OO 1 �/ 1r/' , /� ^Nrn • bPo ��`^ ,.N � ••W .-.� ',.1. 'yew,Virig rer �) 8'P, a • 1 S I ✓ .ol 9� i INsiII I' v';�l� :lam"'. '$,�'_l-__ ,, p- .®Ir\ ,, C PS 41Af p �i P'. t-4 �• e 1ii_.' �). � ° sF - t , r E 1 '0. i°� I;e ae► (l�s�.-.ao�;s'tee..__s; . ��I�Jam/ ,, , i® as ..;. :�B,y,; aa�sl omb.n-�� �s������rir:` .' .i . ■■9�j� 1�11 f�sb ®nma..11_,l�aniilietaili eeds h6�r7ie�_a, I '\��;�\�i�\.r�r `���' �+�ac�� • - I ' --Nsturomfrvirtem IevalreAvrAtgre - - - - - - 1 1 — — — — _ W 1 6 EA F-4 'PT!, 0 6�S0' 610 I2f0' W E. ,.....\410,0—,k • ,•e\ I 1 -- M , Ci) O\�\,\'. . 50NE:P+50'-0• FJ--i Ex" �• _.�'''\ice ..i/' Ed I III II Ir ar...., s>m LANDSCAPE Landscape Architecture a� d u,os® PLAN 1! Lx P i 1 ,--- .. n , 2 __M S,RMR4ttaPg a Y hx PPP lq "rim fill ! fd i ' 1'o N , 41110 n A 11 OA! f " 94 '-' " " 0 ' 1 11. 101 hORdi0 ii Wil 1 li ___I . mmHg!111111E e — .111111 V 111111E [ 3 o .XV”aeuu > MI 11111I110= c Ems . ell IfflhI IIIIi ,.. , • =111111=IID=1111I 111111=11 III h egg>_�jj_xEQ AsptIg_j Z4 m ; ; m §t3 m 3 hhnnn hn 67, Y 4 2,1 19 a Y A. Y HI; 4 4 M 4; 0 A 48 ;1 41 Ah 8q g 1 HI 1E 01 PA 6 34 ; gi 8 a� 11 ¢' 1 BUN SI il. 'It-41 ' IIIIIL, i i $ b 11 Eliflaha \ ot , T N 1 Inv lh E 1 ,MP > III l . {{ s gg slo D VE (206) 433-8997 m w2 it PACIFIC GULF PROPERTIES r `206) 246-6369 InIA� n>, °R-° "°'"� 1� > LIND AVE. AND SW 39TH ST. g^V DATE RENTON, WASHINGTON 12720 OAIEWAY DRIVE SUITE II6 CHECKED ae Lr ur AT6TLE.IWASTGTTB IAA/AA r ,......— .f d p CITY OF RENTON p '��rl , ,Wr.._._- Planning/Building/Public Works r Ore + 1055 South Grady Way - Renton Washington 98055 ,.;vi'd "L'''"_ . µ`'mF0 l- a0N 0 9'S 9 =°`�� ` 0 3 0 5 g !nclaimed sum cc cc - -- i ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED Refused i 0 lET Attempted Not Known • u.s. POSTAGE : Insufficient Address No Such Street -Jo Such Number 4 11 10 99 FM PRESORTED SEA IAA `!; 1 -ic• Such Office In State envelope ��� NORTHERN RAILROA BURLINGTON (� = 3504--E_Valley Rd Renton, WA 98055 i � F,iU,r,::%r? � 1 3--I/ ' S1 j+',;`I rrl _ . � IRETIMN i s SENDER v. v J i j tj j i jj jj i $$ C \� } ... iiiii£iiifi�liiiiiiiiii£iii£iii££iidiiid£££-�£3ilili£i£iii£1ii1 ° Q ' , Q � W rY �r� r s'r sY �rr C>"*- : —i.- --IA _____ M i mr II 4 -. . i :..c? I� �- — 1"-O o- I i I rY --I- — .-0 o-, _ I _ - I ® 1 L }� +- 4 -9 — — i a1---1- r i a i: j-f- .. 1- - I G —4II I o-�. »„, + —+ s - - o 1 r II a i , X t I i I:: ��; } I I - —;:.-0 , ;a — + I I I I ° �i 4 1 - �^ �•• I- + H- — — ---o i -�- 1---rY I i o-•' 1 i — — ,--o , •\ � 11 I 44y�7+-- ••; ► . -I. — — 1--© 4 o-.•- I I rii • I a 1Y iY /Y W r rY 'rb b b I Xri 433-9997 m uArt oarxmpl Ile S PACIFIC GULF PROPERTIES • `"� 206 °3 246- °° _ ac- °MeM� y, . O LIND AVE. AND SW 39TH ST. "°` °" ' X) RENTON, WASHINGTON I27ID CAMAS oe1E SIDE Il oa,®/I DAM VCNtsCt irATV. WAS IIING 8 1 r - am CIMM i aw.urn =I 1 l( aw.awT i ref s,. • a t�4 • ilk MR Illi i ;t /I- ,JIF r aw.3�TH _ / - yf lY I 1 )lJ iIT .____4 - i 1=I f . ...r ____ - ' ,1 i. . It 'CLAIMERS al e ~ 7 g` allq U p S.M. 1,,, o irni, II 1, _ ......._ _____ , . .__,I, ff;z1 - Mt ,-, MINN MST Si. f11 .I. Q riOF li k Min 1 ' 1*. 111 , Millr_C°. 0 �r� '° rr � • '' ''a. Ii i , ..- r r.320 . NEIGHBORHOOD DETAIL MAP — PACIFIC GULF PROPERTIES r Smooth Feed SheetsTM - 105 Zig Se-1- Use template for 5160® G I JOES INC NORTHERN RAILROA BURLINGTON EASTGATE THEATRE INC 9505 SW Boeckman Rd 3501 E Valley Rd 7132 Commercial Park Dr Wilsonville,OR 97070 Renton,WA 98055 Knoxville,TN 37918 LLC POWELL-ORILLIA LITTLE DELI MART INC PRUDENTIAL INS CO OF AMERIC 737 Market St 19253 84Th Ave S 12835 Bel Red Rd#140 Kirkland,WA 98033 Kent,WA 98032 Bellevue,WA 98005 ARENSBERG INVESTMENTS BADFORD PROPERTY INVESTOR INC BADFORD PROPERTY INVESTOR INC 3401 Lind Ave SW 270 Lafayette Cir 270 Lafayette Cir Renton,WA 98055 Lafayette,CA 94549 Lafayette,CA 94549 BADFORD PROPERTY INVESTOR INC BADFORD PROPERTY INVESTOR INC PUGET SOUND BLOOD CENTER 270 Lafayette Cir 270 Lafayette Cir 921 Terry Ave Lafayette,CA 94549 Lafayette,CA 94549 Seattle,WA 98104 VICTORIA PARK PO Box 1104 Renton,WA 98057 AVERY® Address Labels Laser 5160® 11 I bit/ rt lii. An III I II • ) ,. p Esir• ) 1 •�aim= ' /ii � #111 il .0~) i wens. 7 •••.__. .. •,1 _.......,.. rill' liii 4 ,--- ... ." I 1* isl _ 6 'o i im mta 0 gip • . .. 'Yr, ' -me-p ,0 ,,,i AIM is,}.r' NEIGHBORHOOD DETAIL MAP -, ..ovc our r.ora.ne. q9 -r u m Return Address: City Clerk's Office I City of Renton 00��0, 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 20°21.12 20.00 CITY 0 it TO 2gs 11t22/2002 11:48 KING COUNTY, WA KING COUNTY 0 BILL OF SALE Property Tax Parcel Number: (Z$' G060 4,,?_— Project File#: Street Intersection: Address: V.Ooo 3 10 4 w 39+% 44- 4l.,kd HOC.' tQ '3400 C.;..a q,,c, S,w, Reference Number(s)of Documents assigned or released:Additional reference numbers are on page Grantor(s): ' ,^ " " ,�� ' Grantee(s): �C 1. C.G 1 VJ 1Gt L64-,,�i a I 1. City of Renton, a Municipal Corporation The Grantor,as named above,for,and in consideration of mutual benefits,hereby grants,bargains,sells and delivers to Lam`'- the Grantee,as named above,the following described personal property: WATER SYSTEM: Length Size Type Q Pico L.F.of (0 " Dl ((am ST. Water Main CD Z c L.F.of 2 i r-- Water Main LJ 'L 4 ye C N 26— L.F.of Z " l eiL ionl Water Main w. • c ( each of SS Gate Valves _ 2- each of �o " Gate Valves "E""" 3 each of Fire Hydrant Assemblies SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM: Length Size Type .1 -~ L.F.of Sewer Main C L.F.of Sewer Main L.F.of Sewer Main N each of " Diameter Manholes each of _,_ " Diameter Manholes - each of " Diameter Manholes w STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM: Length Size Type L.F.of " a Storm Line L.F.of " Storm Line L.F.of 11Storm Line each of Storm Inlet/Outlet each of 11 Storm Catch Basin each of Manhole STREET IMPROVEMENTS: cluding Curb,Gutter,Sidewalk,Asphalt Pavement) Curb,Gutter,Sidewalk L.F. Asphalt Pavement: 9 SY or L.F.of Width STREET LIGHTING: #of Poles f By this conveyance,Grantor will warrant and defend the sale hereby made unto the Grantee against all and every person or persons,whomsoever,lawfully claiming or to claim the same. This conveyance shall bind the heirs,executors, administrators and assigns forever. 2002-010to as H:\FILE.SYS\FRM\84HNDOUTIBILLSALE.DOC\MAB Page 1 Form 84 0001/bh _ IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal the day and year as written below. Ail ,eirAfel( /6/24/0' INDIVIDUAL FORM OFACKYOWLEDGMENT Notary Seal must be within box STATE OF WASHINGTON )SS COUNTY OF KING ) • I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument - Notary Public in and for the State of Washineton Notary(Print) My appointment expires: C) Dated: REPRESENTATIVE FORM OFAC&VOWLEDGME.VT �. Notary Se must ae ' box STATE OF itI„A,SII fe` efN )SS C F COUNTY OF Y..0 iC C i Q .8 N I certify that I know or have s tisfacto y evt ncee that Cj >-A 9 8 r• co .q (. e. e— signed this instrument,on oath �'!� • = xr v stated that het he/they was/were authorized to execute the instrument and U w acknowledged it as the and of to be the free and voluntary act of such a) p , arties for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. rn • r ' • Nota Pub is i d for le State t 1,ilashin ton CAAt,t+-run.N.- Notary(Print) N • ySc ' My appointment expires: (,�,(� �.( 1 LJSR Dated: e 2,4t CORPORATE FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT Notary Seal must be within box STATE OF WASHINGTON )SS COUNTY OF KING ) _ On this day of , 19 ,before me personally appeared to me'known to be of the corporation that executed the within instrument,and acknowledge the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation,for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and each on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary(Print) My appointment expires: Dated: Page 2 Return Address: 11111111111111111 City Clerk's Office 20021122001704 City of Renton CITY OF RENTON EAS 24.00 1055 South Grady Way PAGE 001 OF 006 Renton, WA 98055 11/22/2002 11:48 KING COUNTY: WA KING COUNTY, a WATER UTILITY EASEMENT Property Tax Parcel Number:1253600062 Project File#: - ;.g q,9 Street Intersection or Project Name:Renton Commerce Center Reference Number(s)of Documents assigned or released: Additional reference numbers are on page N/A. Grantor(s): Grantee(s): 1.Calwest Industrial Properties,LLC 1. City of Renton, a Municipal Corporation 2. The Grantor(s),as named above,for and in consideration of mutual benefits,do by these presents,grant,bargain,sell, convey,and warrant unto the above named Grantee,its successors and assigns,an easement for public water line with 411, necessary appurtenances over,under,through,across and upon the following described property(the right-of-way)in King County,Washington,(additional legal is on page 4 of document),more particularly described as follows: Abbreviated Legal Description: O A 15.00 foot wide strip of land within Consolidated Lot created by City of Renton Boundary Line Adjustment No.LUA-00- ..7"- 079-LLA,recorded under King County Auditor's file No.20000808900005 and situated in the SW Quarter of Section 30, Township 23 North,Range 5 East,W.M.,in the City of Renton,King County,Washington. _) ( ..\1 CJ CL. CD 2002- DID wtrease.doc\ Page 1 FORM 03 0009/bh/ For the purpose of constructing,reconstructing,installing,repairing,replacing,enlarging,operating and maintaining Water Line utilities and utility pipelines,together with the right of ingress and egress thereto without prior institution of any suit or proceedings of law and without incurring any legal obligation or liability therefor. Following the initial construction of its facilities,Grantee may from time to time construct such additional facilities as it may require. This easement is granted subject to the following terms and conditions: 1. The Grantee shall,upon completion of any work within the property covered by the easement,restore the surface of the easement,and any private improvements disturbed or destroyed during execution of the work,as nearly as practicable to the condition they were in immediately before commencement of the work or entry by the Grantee. 2. Grantor shall retain the right to use the surface of the easement as long as such use does not interfere with the easement rights granted to the Grantee. CD Grantor shall not,however,have the right to: a. Erect or maintain any buildings or structures within the easement;or b. Plant trees,shrubs or vegetation having deep root patterns which may cause damage to or interfere with the utilities to be placed within the easement by the Grantee;or CD c. Develop,landscape,or beautify the easement area in any way which would unreasonably increase the costs to the Grantee of restoring the easement area and any private improvements therein. �--) d. Dig,tunnel or perform other forms of construction activities on the property which would disturb the fv\J compaction or unearth Grantee's facilities on the right-of-way,or endanger the lateral support facilities. e. Blast within fifteen(15)feet of the right-of-way. This easement shall run with the land described herein,and shall be binding upon the parties,their heirs, successors in interest and assigns. Grantors covenant that they are the lawful owners of the above properties and that they have a good and lawful right to execute this agreement. C'tii By this conveyance,Grantor will warrant and defend the sale hereby made unto the Grantee against all and every person or persons,whomsoever,lawfully claiming or to claim the same. This conveyance shall bind the heirs, Cry executors,administrators and assigns forever. .���,�,� IN WITNESS WHEREOF,said Grantor has caused this instrument to be executed this day of��1�.4,0Lz 9 OZ• AlifidtA/11( INDIVIDUAL FORM OFACKNOWLEDGMENT Notary Seal must be within box STATE OF WASHINGTON )SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary(Print) My appointment expires: Dated: wtrease.doc\ Page 2 FORM 03 0009/bh/ INDIVIDUAL FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT Notary Seal must be within box STATE OF WASHINGTON )SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument Notary Public in and for the State of Washington a Notary(Print) My appointment expires: Dated: SiCN1 E REPRESENTATIVE FORM OFACKN WLLDGMENT Notary Seal ust be wi ij x STATE OF WArErlittlEffeN )SS Z fa E Z , COUNTY OF RM. ) L` ,I qynctezb. r°§N I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that • mAo }O c�'i u N signed this instrument,on oath CN4 _ # • a w stated that hOALe/sh /they was/were authorized to execute the instrument and w2 '3 acknowledged it as the and a j p Z+ur of to be the free and voluntary act of such CN1 co v 'r°� party/parties for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. o �N r• • '�'���' �} Notary Public in and for the St to of • Tie .2 : . Notary(Print 11e— , 14S3 My appointment expires: Dated: �7la d� . - CORPORATE FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT Notary Seal must be within box STATE OF WASHINGTON )SS COUNTY OF KING ) On this day of , 19 ,before me personally appeared to me known to be of the corporation that executed the within instrument,and acknowledge the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation,for the uses and purposes therein mentioned,and each on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary(Print) My appointment expires: Dated: D:\SDSK\PROJ\LIND\wtrease.doc\ Page 3 FORM 03 0008/bh/ 10/15/02 Renton Commerce Center EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION A 15.00 foot wide strip of land situated in the SW Quarter of Section 30, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W. M.,in the City of Renton, King County, Washington, and lying 7.50 feet on each side of the following described line: 111, Beginning at the Northwest corner of the Consolidated Lot as shown on City of Renton Q Boundary Line Adjustment No. LUA-00-079-LLA,recorded under King County Auditor's File No. 20000808900005,records of King County, Washington; _. Thence S 02°09'37"W along the Westerly line of said Consolidated Lot for a distance of Ga 87.84 feet to the True Point of Beginning of said line; Thence N 83°50'26"E for a distance of 221.23 feet; C ,l Thence S 88°09'51"E for a distance of 6.41 feet to Point"A"; C Thence continuing at S 88°09'51"E for a distance of 8.03 feet; q.._ Thence S 43°09'51"E for a distance of 33.08 feet; Thence S 02°09'18"W for a distance of 94.72 feet to Point"B"; (N Thence continuing at S 02°09'18"W for a distance of 489.64 feet to Point"C"; Thence continuing at S 02°09'18"W for a distance of 182.27 feet; CD Thence S 47°09'37"W for a distance of 51.15 feet; (N Thence N 87°50'23"W for a distance of 108.52 feet; Thence N 35°42'27"W for a distance of 61.49 feet to Point"D"; Thence continuing at N 35°42'27"W for a distance of 112.92 feet to the Westerly line of said Consolidated Lot and the end of this line description. The side lines of said 15.00 foot wide strip of land are to be extended or shortened to meet at angle points and to terminate at the Westerly line of said Consolidated Lot. Together with a 15.00 foot wide strip of land lying 7.50 feet on each side of the following described line; Beginning at the hereinabove described Point"A"; Thence S 02°09'37"W for a distance of 34.53 feet to the Northerly face of the building at 3600 Lind Avenue SW, Renton, Washington, and the end of this line description. Together with a 15.00 foot wide strip of land lying 7.50 feet on each side of the following described line; Beginning at the hereinabove described Point`B"; Thence S 87°50'42"E for a distance of 20.69 feet to the end of this line description. 1 of 2 10/15/02 Renton Commerce Center Together with a 15.00 foot wide strip of land lying 7.50 feet on each side of the following described line; Beginning at the hereinabove described Point"C"; Thence S 87°50'42" E for a distance of 23.25 feet to the end of this line description. Together with a 15.00 foot wide strip of land lying 7.50 feet on each side of the following described line; CD Beginning at the hereinabove described Point"D"; Thence N 54°17'33"E for a distance of 11.92 feet to the end of this line description. C:) CD sat •MAN 3 , wAs (NJ ff ' \ ray ' C) �� L�C23345 9 °NAL LAl`95 7. EXPIRES 2/3/ '0 10 v ih%% %%%% 2 of 2 EASEMENT EXHIBIT FOR WATERLINE LINE TABLE[ LINE LENGTH BEARING Ll 221.23 S83'50'26'1./ L2 6.41 N88'09'51'1./ L3 8.03 N88'09'51'1./ L4 33.08 S43'09'51'E dl L5 94.72 NO2'09'18'EI P❑B L6 489.64 NO2'09'18'E L16 P❑INT 'A' L7 182.27 NO2'09'18'E - L8 C 51,15 N47'09'37'E Icn L9 108.52 S87'50'23'E - L2 L3 J Ll L10 61.49 N35'42'27'1./ TPOB =ru `F r L11 112.92 N35'42'27'1./ 1 CD L12 34.53 NO2'09'37'E I L13 L13 20,69 S87'50'42'E I N W L14 23.25 N87'50'42' I P❑INT 'B' L15 11.92 S54'17'33'1./ I z C`i L16 359.16 N87'50'47'W I Q 't L17 715.93 SO1'50'09'1./ u) I x EY %-r- L18 218,70 S28'33'51'W W U L19 112.00 501'50'09'W Z N D 3 i L20 173.08 N36'53'17' I>Wvp L21 263.84 S00'14'29'W <� I I J z C L22 381.46 SO2'09'37'14 0 3600 LI L23 87.84 S02'09'37'W -J - AVE. SW ND w U N87°06'45'V/ I z U L14 S84 81l'E 6 I POINT 'C' U W�S�E �� lr J S 39TH sr r I cb Plic--1 CURVE TABLE I `f0 L9 N,Q3 P❑INT 'D' CURVE LENGTH RADIUS DELTA (\\Ci 3 Cl 109,33 120.00 52'12'08' C2 75,92 120,00 36'14'56' 2 C3 65.07 806.74 4'37'18' C4 94.69 2052.79 2'38'34' / C5 4.36 806.74 0'18'35' SCALE: 1: 200 --'-" ' Engineering Planning Surveying Penhallegon Associates Consulting Engineers, Inc. CMJ /'� 750 Sixth Street South Kirkland, WA 98033 www.paceengrs.com S PH: (425) 827-2014 1-800-945-8408 FAX: (425) 827-5043 Kirkland • Federal Way • Cie Elum SCALE: 1: 200 FILE:\0000.DWG DATE: 9/10/02 PROJ. NO.: 02626.00 „ -` 1 CITY �,11� RENTON Planning/Building/PublicWorks Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator November 20, 2002 Alan Bylsma David Kehle Architects 12720 Gateway Drive, Suite 116 Seattle, WA 98168 Subject: Modification of Approved Site Plan for Pacific Gulf Properties (aka Renton Commerce Center) File No. LUA-99-105, SA-H, ECF Dear Mr. Bylsma: This letter is to inform you that we have reviewed your proposed revisions to the "Pacific Gulf” site plan and have granted your request for a minor modification to the approved site plan. This approved modification shall supercede all previously issued modification decisions. The site plan was initially approved by the Hearing Examiner on January 25, 2000 and included a 106,752 gross square foot building (98,752 square foot footprint and 8,000 square foot mezzanine) for an industrial warehouse/office building. The building would have four recessed bays with dock-high loading doors for loading on the east side of the structure. Based on the anticipated mix of tenant uses, 210 parking spaces were provided on the approved plans. Subsequent to this approval, a modification to the site plan was granted which allowed for a 2,000 square foot increase to the mezzanine. As the property is presently developed, there is an existing building footprint of 98,752 square feet with a constructed mezzanine area of 8,793 square feet (out of the 10,000 square feet approved). In consideration of the previous modifications granted for the site plan as well as in anticipation of future requests as needed by potential tenants, the applicant is now requesting the approval of an additional 8,675 square feet of mezzanine area. In combination with the originally approved mezzanine (8,000 square feet) and subsequently approved additional mezzanine areas (2,000 square feet), the proposed modification would result in a total mezzanine area of 18,675 square feet. The constructed building footprint and total approved mezzanine area would result in 117,427 square feet of gross building area. The Site Plan regulations define a minor adjustment or modification to an approved site plan as a change which does not involve more than a 10% increase in area or scale of the development, does not have a significantly greater impact on the environment and facilities, and does not change the boundaries of the originally approved plan (RMC § 4- 9-200.H). The requested 117,427 square feet of gross building area would add an additional 10,675 square feet to the originally approved building — resulting in an increase of 9.9%. The overall appearance of the building would remain as approved and no modifications 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 RENTON 43 This paper contains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE November 20, 2002 Minor Modification Page 2 of 2 are proposed to the parking, landscape or vehicle circulation areas. The proposed interior alterations to the structure have been determined not to pose any impacts significantly greater than those reviewed under the original proposal. In addition, the increase in building area would result in a revised parking requirement of a minimum of 188 spaces to a maximum of 258 spaces. As initially approved, the site plan would provide for a total of 210 on-site parking spaces. In consideration of the requested modification, the provision of the approved 210 spaces would remain in compliance with the parking regulations. Based on the reasons described above, the requested mezzanine increase has been approved as a minor modification to the previously approved site plan. The applicant is advised that all code requirements, conditions of the site plan approval and mitigating measures of the environmental review are still applicable to the development of the site. The applicant should also understand that Environmental (SEPA) Review approval may be required for future modifications to the site plan. This decision to approve the proposed revisions as a minor modification is subject to a fourteen (14) day appeal period from the date of this letter. Any appeals of the administrative decision must be filed with the City of Renton Hearing Examiner by 5:00 pm, December 6, 2002. If you have questions regarding this correspondence, feel free to contact Lesley Nishihira at (425) 430-7270. Sincerely, r t) 4.41) v Jennifer Henning Zoning Administrator cc: Land Use File Jan Conklin Lesley Nishihira C•• dav'd kehle architect October 24, 2002 OEVEi.cipME coyofRE oN/NG OCT 7 5?007 RECEIVED City of Renton 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Attn: Ms. Lesley Nishihira Re: Minor Modification to Site Plan Renton Commerce Center Dear Ms. Nishihira, On January 25, 2000 LUA99-105 was approved for the Renton Commerce Center project. Under this approval 98,762 SF for the building footprint and 8,000 SF for mezzanines was approved for construction. Subsequently an administrative approval for minor modification to the approved site plan was requested on June 18, 2002 for an additional 2,000 SF of mezzanine. This request was granted on July 16, 2002. Currently a total 10,000 SF of mezzanine is approved for construction for this project along with the original 98,762 SF footprint. Since the approval of the July 16, 2002 minor modification, a total of 8,793 SF of mezzanine has been constructed for several tenants. This leaves 1,207 SF of potential mezzanine that can be built under current approvals. Presently the owner is receiving interest by perspective tenants for additional mezzanine space. These requests would exceed the present authorized mezzanine area. Per the approval letter, dated July 16, 2002, by Jennifer Henning, we are allowed to increase the overall square footage, above the original approved building area by 10%. This could be done by the minor modification to site plan process. Since the original square footage approved under LUA99-105 was 106,752 SF that means we could increase the total square footage by 10,675 SF. That would give the owner a total of 117,427 SF potential building area. Because a 2,000 SF increase for mezzanine area has already been approved by using the minor modification process, the owner is requesting at this time an increase of 8,675 SF for potential mezzanines. This would bring the building's allowable area, combined footprint and 12720 GATEWAY DRIVE, SUITE 116 (206) 433-8997 SEATTLE,WA 98168 FAX (206) 246-8369 email: dkehle©seanet.com Ms. Lesley Nishihira City of Renton Re: Renton Commerce Center October 24, 2002 Page 2 minor modification procedure. The requested increase would be for future additional mezzanine and would not affect the building footprint area in any way. He would like to go to the maximum allowable at this time so we will not have to repeat this process every time there is a new tenant. In closing, there are no impacts from this proposed allowable building area increase. This request for increased area would not adversely affect the neighboring businesses or surrounding properties. The parking ratios are still within the allowable range, 188 stalls required and 210 provided. Neither the exterior of the building or the site will be modified due to this request. I hope this application will be quickly reviewed and approved. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, C24 Alan Bylsma AB/mt cc: Mr. Peter Vanderburg Mr. Mike Sedwick A:\9830\c ityl et 10-24-02 Lk C51 " " CITY RF,NTON emu Planning/Building/PublicWorks Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator July 16, 2002 David Kehle David Kehle Architects 12720 Gateway Drive, Suite 116 Seattle, WA 98168 Subject: Modification of Approved Site Plan for Pacific Gulf Properties File No. LUA-99-105, SA-H, ECF Building Permit No. B020290 (Compuvest) Dear Mr. Kehle: This letter is to inform you that we have reviewed your proposed revisions to the "Pacific Gulf" site plan. The site plan was initially approved by the Hearing Examiner on January 25, 2000 and was further modified under an approved minor modification on September 27, 2000 (attached). The most recently approved site plan included a 106,752 gross square foot building (98,752 square foot footprint and 8,000 square foot mezzanine) for an industrial warehouse/office building. The building would have four recessed bays with dock-high loading doors for loading on the east side of the structure. Based on the anticipated mix of tenant uses, 210 parking spaces were provided on the approved plans. Subsequent to these approvals, the building footprint has been constructed as proposed. However, a mezzanine of only 5,980 square feet in area has been built. The intended tenant for the building (Compuvest) would like to construct an additional 2,813 square feet of mezzanine area, which would result in a net increase of 815 square feet of mezzanine area over the originally approved site plan (5,980 sf existing mezzanine + 2,835 sf proposed mezzanine = 8,815 sf). Therefore, in order to provide the additional area needed by occupants of the constructed building, the applicant is requesting a modification in order to allow for a total of 10,000 square feet in mezzanine area — resulting in a revised gross square footage of 108,752 for the building. This modification is also intended to allow for the possible construction of a 1,185 square foot mezzanine area at a future date. The Site Plan regulations define a minor adjustment or modification to an approved site plan as changes which do not involve more than a 10% increase in area or scale of the development, do not have a significantly greater impact on the environment and facilities, and do not change the boundaries of the originally approved plan (RMC § 4-9- 200.H). The proposed 2,000 square foot increase in potential mezzanine area would result in less than a 2% change in the gross building square footage approved for the site. The overall appearance of the building would remain as approved and no modifications are proposed to the parking, landscape or vehicle circulation areas. The proposed interior alterations to the structure have been determined not to pose any impacts significantly greater than those reviewed under the original proposal. In addition, the increase in 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 R E N T O N CI�� AHEAD OF THE CURVE This paper contains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer Compuvest Page 2 of 2 building area would result in a parking requirement of a minimum of 184 spaces to a maximum of 251 spaces. As initially approved, the site would provide a total of 210 on- site parking spaces. Based on these reasons, the proposed changes are approved as a minor modification to the previously approved site plan. The applicant is advised that all code requirements, conditions of the site plan approval and mitigating measures of the environmental review are still applicable to the development of the site. The applicant should also understand that Environmental (SEPA) Review approval may be required for future modifications to the site plan. This decision to approve the proposed revisions as a minor modification is subject to a fourteen (14) day appeal period from the date of this letter. Any appeals of the administrative decision must be filed with the City of Renton Hearing Examiner by 5:00 pm, July 30, 2002. If you have questions regarding this correspondence, feel free to contact Lesley Nishihira at (425) 430-7270. Sincerely, Jennifer Henning Zoning Administrator cc: Land Use File Jan Conklin Lesley Nishihira dav'd kehle arc ec June 18, 2002 City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, Washington 98055 Attn: Ms. Lesley Nishihira Re: Compuvest - Suite 130 & 140 Renton Commerce Center #B020290 Dear Lesley, Per your plan review comment letter received June 12, 2002, I am requesting the administrative approval for the modification to the above project's site plan as previously approved under LUA- 99-105. In that approval, the proposed building footprint was to be 98,752 SF with a proposed 8,000 SF of mezzanine. In subsequent permitting, the footprint has stayed the same and only 5,980 SF of mezzanine was constructed, leaving 2,020 SF to remain under the original square footage. Compuvest is proposing a new net 2,813 SF of mezzanine, which is 793 SF over the original approved site plan. We are requesting a modification to the original site plan by adding up to 2,000 SF of additional mezzanine office area (total footprint 98,252 SF with 10,000 SF mezzanine). The parking still fits within the parking standards so no increase in the parking is required. Thank you for your review and I trust this request is clear and will be reviewed and approved quickly. If you need anything else or have questions, please feel free to call. Sin - Ag/ David Kehle DK/mt Enclosure: Two site plans cc: Mr. Mike Sedwick Mr. Peter Vanderburg a:\9830T\comuvest/citylet6-18c 12720 GATEWAY DRIVE, SUITE 116 (206) 433-8997 SEATTLE,WA 98168 FAX (206) 246-8369 email: dkehle©seanet.com CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NUMBER: LUA-00-137,ECF APPLICANT: 360 Networks PROJECT NAME: 360 Networks Emergency Generators DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental Review (SEPA)for the installation of up to 17 generators for use as backup power service as part of building improvements needed for the future tenant. The building will be occupied by 360 Networks, which provides web hosting, client hosting and facility areas for other companies to provide computer connections to multiple fiber optics communication lines and companies. Each generator would include a double wall, 4,000-gallon diesel fuel tank with built-in overflow protection and noise mufflers for exhaust systems. The generators would be located on the West Side of the building behind screening barriers within truck bay loading areas. Three generators are proposed within three of the four recessed truck bay area and four generators are proposed within the fourth truck bay area. The accumulated total of the tanks associated with the generators exceeds 10,000 gallons; therefore, SEPA review is necessary. The property previously underwent Site Plan and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the Pacific Gulf Development proposal (file no. LUA-99-105), which was received a Determination of Non-Significance — Mitigated (DNS-M) on December 14, 1999. A minor modification to the approved site plan has been approved to allow for the proposed revisions to the approved development plan. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 3600 Lind Avenue SW Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Fire Separate plans and permits are required with the Fire Department for each of the 17 tanks. Building Building, electrical and mechanical permits are required. advisory notes CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE APPLICATION NUMBER: LUA-00-137,ECF APPLICANT: 360 Networks PROJECT NAME: 360 Networks Emergency Generators DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental Review (SEPA) for the installation of up to 17 generators for use as backup power service as part of building improvements needed for the future tenant. The building will be occupied by 360 Networks, which provides web hosting, client hosting and facility areas for other companies to provide computer connections to multiple fiber optics communication lines and companies. Each generator would include a double wall, 4,000-gallon diesel fuel tank with built-in overflow protection and noise mufflers for exhaust systems. The generators would be located on the West Side of the building behind screening barriers within truck bay loading areas. Three generators are proposed within three of the four recessed truck bay area and four generators are proposed within the fourth truck bay area. The accumulated total of the tanks associated with the generators exceeds 10,000 gallons; therefore, SEPA review is necessary. The property previously underwent Site Plan and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the Pacific Gulf Development proposal (file no. LUA-99-105), which was received a Determination of Non-Significance — Mitigated (DNS-M) on December 14, 1999. A minor modification to the approved site plan has been approved to allow for the proposed revisions to the approved development plan. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 3600 Lind Avenue SW LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section This Determination of Non-Significance is issued under WAC 197-11-340. Because other agencies of jurisdiction may be involved, the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fourteen (14) days. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM December 4, 2000. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: November 20, 2000 DATE OF DECISION: November 14, 2000 SIGNATURES: ler 11 l 7 60 Greg Zrmm r an, A DATE Departmen of la . g/Building/Public Works �`/ I q(c6 Jim hepherd, A nistra r DATE' Co 'munity Services Department /47 A . A /i LeTer, ire Chief DATE R- to Fire Department dnssignature STAFF City of Renton REPORT Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE A. BACKGROUND ERC MEETING DATE November 14, 2000 Project Name: 360 Networks Emergency Generators Applicant: 360 Networks File Number: LUA-00-137, ECF Project Manager: Lesley Nishihira Project Description: The applicant is requesting Environmental Review (SEPA) for the installation of up to 17 generators for use as backup power service as part of building improvements needed for the future tenant. The building will be occupied by 360 Networks, which provides web hosting, client hosting and facility areas for other companies to provide computer connections to multiple fiber optics communication lines and companies. Each generator would include a double wall, 4,000-gallon diesel fuel tank with built-in overflow protection and noise mufflers for exhaust systems. The generators would be located on the West Side of the building behind screening barriers within truck bay loading areas. Three generators are proposed within three of the four recessed truck bay area and four generators are proposed within the fourth truck bay area. The accumulated total of the tanks associated with the generators exceeds 10,000 gallons; therefore, SEPA review is necessary. The property previously underwent Site Plan and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the Pacific Gulf Development proposal (file no. LUA-99-105), which was received a Determination of Non-Significance— Mitigated (DNS-M) on December 14, 1999. A minor modification to the approved site plan has been approved to allow for the proposed revisions to the approved development plan. Project Location: 3600 Lind Avenue SW Exist. Bldg. Area gsf: 197,504 sq. ft. (to be constructed) Proposed New Bldg. Area: N/A Site Area: 7.39 acres Total Building Area gsf: 197,504 sq. ft. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS). 1 II J ( - II ) S.W.34TH I( 4) 1 ! r.f°;i r: I 1 0 HOME F-PARKING A W :i6. Ili J BASE F { i tu C F 1 .. z IL +: 7 J " a • � J a a xr H ST. • `g H Ilihm.N.,*.oZ: o . ff.• �--1 +M.OLCENT RAILROAD R/W 1- --� r Project Location Map ctlIt. ,, r L e� Scur MST ST. „� City cf Renton P/B/PW Department Environment w Committee Staff Report 360 NETWORKS EMERGENCY GENERATORS LUA-00-137, ECF REPORT OF NOVEMBER 14, 2000 Page 2 of 3 B. RECOMMENDATION Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINATION OF DETERMINATION OF XX NON-SIGNIFICANCE NON- SIGNIFICANCE- MITIGATED. XX Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS-M with 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS with 15 day Comment Period Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period with Concurrent 14 day Appeal Period. with Concurrent 14 day Appeal Period. C. MITIGATION MEASURES The analysis of the proposal does not reveal the need for mitigation above and beyond existing code provisions. Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Fire 1. Separate plans and permits are required with the Fire Department for each of the 17 tanks. Building 1. Building, electrical and mechanical permits are required. D. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS In compliance with RCW 43.21 C. 240, the following project environmental review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. 1. Earth Impacts: The project site is basically flat and has been cleared of vegetation in preparation for the approved Pacific Gulf development project. No additional grading is proposed for the generators and associated fuel storage tanks. Earthwork activities on the site have been reviewed as part of the land use approval process for the approved development. As approved under the Pacific Gulf development proposal, approximately 65% of the site would be covered with impervious surfaces. No alterations are proposed to the approved impervious area for the property. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation is recommended. Nexus: N/A 2. Water Impacts: The east boundary of the site includes a portion of a wetland area that continues off-site to the east, which was considered as part of the SEPA review for the Pacific Gulf development proposal on the property. This wetland was created as compensatory mitigation for the Home Base and Act III Theater projects located to the east of the subject property. City wetland regulations state that wetlands created or restored as a part of a mitigation project are considered regulated wetlands. The edge of the wetland has been delineated by B-twelve Associates and then surveyed. The created wetland replaced a Category 3 wetland, which require a minimum 25-foot wide buffer. The proposal would not alter the required buffer area from the delineated edge of the wetland. The proposed generators would be self-contained within an enclosed ventilated acoustical cabinet with a 4,000- gallon dual containment diesel belly tank. Each tank would be fitted with fuel overflow protection and the cabinets would be designed for secondary spill containment. Spill pads would also be utilized at filling areas for the tanks. A drainage narrative was submitted with the land use application, which states that the dual compartment fuel storage tanks are completely enclosed units and would not require additional spill containment measures. The previous drainage report for the development of the site analyzed the subject areas as impervious surface, which ercrpt City of Renton P/B/PW Department Environment w Committee Staff Report 360 NETWORKS EMERGENCY GENERATORS LUA-00-137,ECF REPORT OF NOVEMBER 14, 2000 Page 3 of 3 the proposal would not alter. The proposed generators and associated fuel tanks are not anticipated to adversely impact water resources on the site, including adjacent wetland areas. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation is recommended. Nexus: N/A 3) Noise Impacts: The generators would only be operated during power outages, with the exception of occasional system start-up checks. Periodic testing of the generators would be conducted a maximum of once per week and would be staggered so that all generators would not be tested at the same time. The timing of the testing would be approximately 15 minutes. Potential impacts from noise associated with the proposed generators could affect adjacent properties, including residential areas east of Lind Avenue (e.g., Talbot Hill area) when generators are operated during power outages. Although the proposed generators would be located on the west side of the building, there is the potential for noise generated from the site to be channeled upward as a result of the screening and may be carried further depending on wind conditions. The applicant has indicated the use of screening and exhaust mufflers in order to reduce potential noise impacts. The final design should take into consideration muffler placement, direction, and screening in order to minimize overall acoustical levels. Overall, noise impacts are likely to be limited and infrequent. Existing code regulations, including the maximum environmental noise levels established by WAC 173-60 as adopted by the City of Renton would ensure noise impacts are kept to a minimum. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation is recommended. Policy Nexus: N/A 4) Aesthetics Impacts: Three generators are proposed within three of the four recessed truck bay area and four generators are proposed within the fourth truck bay area—for a total of 13 generators with associated fuel storage tanks. The generators would be approximately 14 feet in height. The building exterior is approved at a finished height of 36 feet. Screening, which would include a series of metal louvers and panels, is included with the proposal. The screening would arrive at a finished height of 16 feet (2 feet above the generators) and has been designed to be consistent with the approved building, including use of base building colors and accent banding, as well as horizontal framing to align with the approved building modulation and provide unity of horizontal banding. The main building would not be altered and would provide a backdrop to the screening, as well as modulation. No significant alterations to the building design or aesthetics are anticipated from the proposal; therefore, no adverse visual impacts are likely. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation is recommended. Policy Nexus: N/A E. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS The proposal has been circulated to City Departmental/Divisional Reviewers for their review. Where applicable, these comments have been incorporated into the text of this report as Mitigation Measures and/or Notes to Applicant. X Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. Environmental Determination Appeal Process Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM December 4, 2000. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8- 110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)430-6510. ercrpt _. 11.e1r.IM SI0 S,6.. LEG■L DEKRPT 2 V I.1'Yl llw , 103 4 1 g1 S. �ffr6xf�'r1•'�i1�i1' -- .COO.IS Ihh MOSrifm M,ROOM PING OFen � a.,loe � 0141 1Ixrol.Man 0 NM 00 o , MM..WI4 5�rM fRa1.0'PIN.Oh LY1 VIP•%'I PO.. S.4Y.10e I _ ION S.SITE 00.r111 SF NO IRS ai. C � 61 IY O.MG, M 1.Ix, ..lY Sr f 0.MP.•IYI4 SITU ' um FLOOR, Is S • I.OR OF mSMS,I.I, HVIINf41,UIaIIU SR.SI 5 a I Ea . r o USE .10.,Iw• r- la 61.er li.hl M OS• Y won fx..rR:IF POTENTIAL a • n T • 16 MUMS, .r,.1w , /' - rqr gk x zo•r i stm.rcr rwD 1i~:i°ax. v,w f as.¢�iL,1! I J ' c i k p R� i'II.L!.6/LO.OP TOW Mail _ C[ 6 3 O MOM SIM, iIS Sr.h 5 II�I■IILD.4 ICI.. 11'0rM N Smcn4n1031.1.03.SS NOE • '3x1 mapLOT RRMO,WC / W S.,r x.LYRSSM 1141.•map.II.S.r. 13. 7.1 I S t IOgIS4 OOPS O.S WS,O M Ir. m YSSS AO.[a4rMl T.9!S.r. / ,. IS IOR mum m•U MOM"K II If C14O 0 SI.IS 4WIR)IN xSNK I 0/4,466 011336I4 ON.IS IC IX SCOOP.SIN IS.IUS.51000 .RMIa WAS,a•6.MS S.F..o1146 VICINITY MAP WORT 36.6e1 S .F.sa 4I.. it RI SWIM 10,1 OHO O. V,0x1.•0 SS IF MG NIMa SS.090N IASIUIIIYrIS 6311110.MORO_ O I Jg CIp! Y" p■ 1 ` it y3. - s. 1.0 MOW t 16:410„ 13/ • \�I'i _ rrtuo•Irlar r_ _ __ "_z ___.__ 1`__ sren•orinae_ _____ \.� —� C — ""11\\`�` r arwsrrsm. 1 a--- r z/ ��.1 I ilk.' i. • • e • v 5�'S • Imr—r—f} •' • 'S 'S� ---MIETA;A '� A 1 I _I Ino rllr• �•• 1`x • s u l ` ii ' 3 )jII LDIKG FOpiPRINT: 98,15i•F. ; 11 r+� �� r SECOND FLOOR: S8,152•F. ' ii R t __ 19 504•F. If/-K -`�4i�: rr.lore r•A• �, �n1waE..r rl r it '; '.�-�-.k..ulaRr•ara.e. rwR.o WWI .r • � �� y.ras. .."w■ • i�„A s �:��./� IF/,.%� �O/.. ritei� _ iir'°' 1\,`i 1i 01 a .. 'r/�//� -�' ' � •1 y ]<I�/� ![7�I r■�.Ir.r 'I s 1 1 _ ..xad` a 1 M OMIlta Lii E. i�lld�� urnE killICEI� • Ilk Il 4.:: ! c 2;� _IRL:a ::•.w *E�ii ■r �y d..I L.rr4I i� - lI (�/lJa ar•S..rn R..�nr •++.ar■iii. 11 1 el q�V 1•ma1 —.I _ L:!'~M•�— -- ::'....x •r. aR.w ii I y� I.xIIu - - - - - _ •_ • — —. - L:6wr - _ I1 1 M ) S�1 LMD AVQiIE II __ O ram..' • ■.r. — —��\ vnnuli�• •.` __LINO 4�'EN E t �/01C4 • \\ 1� %/�...99 �—.a.--___ mn.mo•w ROW,LW Y4I1n. p erem.Me.e w411.re. / Yhese ram.Y...•MmRere v mem -. i SI?E PLAN = I� • m 1t i I j 1 w SD-1 ' —f Il I It /0 11 • 10/12/00 4:00 pm C OCAD\9830G11LF\SD-1.Erg • PAWED RAS4110 Q Y 4 PAPAW 1LT•I/CQgE1E Y Y �.) ,L-F,,, REIEAI— a rRL S DNG. .._ I; ! t lls � I `1til l Ir 14� MIRM .X"f t 1 cI_, a t.1 H N ,r k ,I }IuAl � t 1 3 1 , r! l , I 3181 ut r . ,.-.:.,. re --h, II- u �r , !r 0 I �.1_ - , STLCCO WANT AND ALIHNM 1ROW GENERATORS TYP. IQIVERS TY1v. ACCDR BAN, RUBE(CLUMSY PANTED R1hSRRY, WEST ELEVATION SOUTH HALF G8"g Ce"' iLT"U^COKPEIE W BRCNI ED • O 0 il—RDEAL PANTED TILT-UP COCIE1EO W'.r.e• O LAVKAPE Q® RrETAL CANOFMES YRN •Ll40 PETAL TIE SAW lit .; I I • t;M �3:7f 1 1A v _--i-,-if—'Wri.'"U ,.((;1 ` 1 . .< :ems IMMTvq. 1,.v I;-. �I._ 1lr s ram;'' it.ow • t ` a „TL{I tl•���r!r.t4 ti"r..Pi f+it:}r<!� 'I;.FIII Y�3ir,;1ttW I a�61 .fi1 I 0 x'S' 91 '$^q 14 w I*�P,. , . r (i - I . g IC RE11m M6 Y Itl� l F-•- EIg ''-.- 1 r,'*'vrz9.,k}I T 1,.'V 11r/ 1[ 8 -9T1iCG0 SORB-- 4U•11U1 DROOy tlAN '"'"c 711i1i1ii ACCENT BBC, RUNE(CLEAR,YV LONERS TYP. GE ERATORS TTT. BRCNZE GLASS TILT-upCCNCFETEW NBLATED PANTEDRAwsrT WEST ELEVATION NORTH HALF PANTED FLAMING ©11111111 LANECAPE BERr1 PANTED TILT-UP SCALE:w•,r"a PANTED TLLT.IIP CCNCRE1E COCRETE Q .! .2 • 44' O REVEAL O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 iRi7 -o�mi�- am ,. i i� ��'- N e 11111111MEMIN1111111111111111111111111111111 4 i<j',.'.';11:•i2V1(''v'VfitiniiiMIEM AA gq �•�� IIII` t110���� ga �.. 4► ACCENT BM)SCANT ara +E f,I- RA BE(C WOOD LACCfA SOM AND ACCENT 6A10 PINE MAMMY Min (CLEAR,IW ACCENT BA10 EI A DLASE � ' LT-UP CCNCREI!W Hmem UARD AM • • . m~ MAID nT+r coNUETe W LMI%!PE CM FEE.AT® NORTH ELEVATION LANSCAPEDEMI SOUTH ELEVATION PALE L1G••I'-0' PANTED RAMIFY, SCALE$w•.r•P O O PANTED TITdP COL-FE1Eo O O 0 ,/1 I �iEL4AL LivID _ 1 a I j I 1 If I • cnz V � AD" � .?•, MIRE O+EwEAt) 1uNe o.v�E.o 14111E ae�EAo Z wwooaE •P1M DCCR MN EAST ELEVATION NORTH HALF PANTEORASNNG •HMI DOOR nM+DooR y Qi H e o e o °�FE EdL ANTED TLLT PCPldE,E^ o 0 0 0 • ® LLr,LL�// A I 3 z a � o0 k; a i �r i I CO W fl 4_,... I PM DOOR I HMI DOCK WE V DOCII ovEwEAD MAN DOCK PENOvEllEAD I DOOR DOCK EAST ELEVATION SOUTH HALF A—7 10/09/00 3 09 pm C-\CAD\0021NE TOW S\A-ID U, of cr Q O O 0 -O U 0 _U sS-© 0 i O © '5- fT � j_U_. /..s- g_ "_� I I . I I I I I I l I l l l l I I I H1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1• 1 1 1 xi, % I ^I I I I I 1 �.�. , ��_r �� n.. _ I I f 1 I i I ' >— — g... h •II —I --I• .+ hI—I—I • _ • h I— I —IH. ± f.II —I ili 11 1 ' \, . _- �--- I— I —I. --I ;-I-- • -I— •I— I —I —I- -•1- I— I— I — --I. 1+ -I-- I— I —I --I• -- �1— I— I —I -I- I-- . — 1-_ _1 lar I_':_'__ -r am- rt-7-r.. - J_.-_`.1=t�t _ a P i --- L, VIM IFiji fi I I Ig i I ©11111111 w _ g OVERALL FIRST FLOOR PLAN 4 wke roes ; NI ita- M;.u.E i•.Mr Ito -m SEE MEET ad ill NW �,. t►/ u 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O © 0 0 0 of n © 0 ��� (il . —.r— • —. — -- sr- —:� LJ •l` I I I I I I I I ! I I I I • I I I R .-d,, .. o .I I I I I I I J ' 1 I I I I I I �z o-; , — — I— —I — + — I— —I — —I— — I— — I-� — {— —i — — I— —I — — ck- - �� 1 > > - L— 1 — — I dx O ol _ - .-- ___--r ; . . - - - - - 1 -- ,, of II I I co o b b b b b , l b b g OVERALL SECOND FLOOR PLAN A-1 !take r.x'-ir 10/09/00 3.02 pm C-\CAD\0027NETV0RKS\A-1.DVG a®— q \ t I (LUA-LIZ-L-LLA} STOW DRAINAGE'SIRLICRAQE3 �.Ee'.q �.' M I ' (d..p rt�R� • c,o e-II-4l•smlKnmc 0cI 1RotsTRtz'ruac IV pwN''" ^ • I LOT 7 v[w oErut,swEEr a PER MAR.sAEEr e • \ --------.\: 11'1 i ' I I ram 14.24 i1v moo 1 I iLUA-9L-15?-LLAj 3'IE 10.61 1•E r0.63 �.a act'L A i1 P I I•■ . I ���w.� _ _l P�:e•uua• wss I i' 4 IFOTTIATr ,F 378.70 P.! r 1' I {pg r;KC ,i \ ` - �r__ --- ` "_\ 0 IY PILE;(ra.8 \ -Os l4'' o.c t ae �.�..^- ,,— 7 Ir PILE; F raQ1 . II ,r c. -� ._—_— 0 rt•OUTLET a Taal \ \` V n 1{fJ i/ an ro.�x � aoRc,.a : s, I MA.0 WILIER SURFACE - I471 1, 1qu I I \ S.3 .* „ C i1r j ,�`aY..+: w rar..mo \ \ roP PctiwAwnvr ooa fa; I -'I I I I -P.>- MG WrseNanwro' 1_____ If mTOOO TAM \ IP°SEA'.Ewr STOPAOE 1.00 \ r; s4 1f11 (4"- -"----- ---- --------- --_--- - A\ iI I, Ii Y it \:p. \.`. n"�a"»'--- '` _ - - ------ rsrs+oco ( \ \ iy III r 11 I 1 \� \\\.\Q\ 26i'. !�I v. tllR __ _�� _� Eor `• ns3 \ oe rwEe-ee 4h i1 T II II I r•'I7 CRF I7 E r7.10 •\ I 1 1 ,` ' •>:L',:7I/r ii r • Pr ,yqy�. __' --_--` _ +r am. roPET,p ii��_,I I I III II \\~, a In //� � ..1•. i - 1�. �r--- I •-IY o�Is=== t s s \,d \ `!/1 , Ii ` . -1- -__-- / .—... --7---Yam-----ems \ nom or now I /� � =`� -� jj11 I I I 1 roomy MAW _ 1111 .Te .!rIIT I 1 /i 'l`�` • i A i fora °rrPE�i co A)Lb/IER I tei r i B/1,55 OPIE ro FMAu 91010l �BLOCKS \ \ ►I�IIIII r r /( �\� II Il.ru.M. lf:3! 1 I _. �/ n rao a sus I aroma off i uwlr �� /l I I �! 1—I—- —— TOP¢.0 `. 1 s ILa•w-.X r //r } . I r i.�\I�\`p\' 1 ' 1 A•'MC;LGCADON Or ROOF -s'e!S�ARWK To o.A \ \ 1. /r , P 1` ' i, owners fur ARaRTEcnatu PUNS) _ os'aoRN-IU.f(P---'--1-.*---�' A i._ -' ,p,„,f110,111,..1.71, +.� �. ---- _ _ 'LQLT -- - Ilz://r..7 I '� 1'f'1 aaIoxnronear WSW CB i ; G,- „ I - 1 d I • II Ya NEAResr cA p e.s N as cawcc m e ,c r1JS r P•ea.e eEnwA w•PKNuA ID S!GA 104 AsTN OR CE VECIED, O.IC 1 CAP PADS ` ? / rZ:rA' a.i' rr r•.0 _-Ay_.___ - `/ 1'o4r r... h`.r.x• I.I I' i 'l IA STp8'IE IS.iJ` .. I•(r11/ F 1 ` Vlit W 4 AaolssgirF law rT \ SRN!CAP STUD&a e'2 IP.ee , 4 ....I , wEV4r416 I .n�+wsNA �' �1 • • ai STUB 4 CAP - ', / • I tt q w-c i x AT • " ' SEE sort-r \ / v I P i V.C.nv. �, 4_____- - .., SEE •R-I ♦ / soloiw>7 F mg i ..w.a..., \1 / ¢' sT o rwEE o I S6'P," is r ISto i *I� 1' � � J 12* ^r ■■ =T _, AIT s �� ar ,: \ i r Ir.A� I�'L w[i/eg�"r'ia " ' m1 •I �If ! ��T;.`.. � d �I'l A, �I rrs'-s•aE �s? A n I�--- -- 1 n.. �r� • a -"-- . . --40/1 ! r 1 Sicm.r�ra 3 .,i I i' I 4;-„, ,r :74e Pa ' 1 TT1 u■. - 1 A� Q.• V .4e4e •� I j �„-w o \yo.� :, � I I Ih 1 / /--T I."0 illirLOW IIZI. vs Iw.R •'• 1/ I • TO '9 _=tiH t Ar.=.r..w*1 - ii# In - !' '.. 1� �� MARO GPM MIS / ` I I I ' RC,SfI►�� - cr ro r--ate'-J_- piC Si 4 .i i[Rr '1.giggri i� 'wv ESP,TO I 7i i mnc E eJ1R n,1 q -W h 2 nr vw — R.,c,ki C. I I 'e"P.��r,11 7:1�-_--- _~'«ov_ ` vwvw.ev ars SOY ADJUST . .����'a >• 1 I I � f!!:T r'MI, -- '• '_`"�`A,- P.,e..r-.ieucu rEo__ __ FINISH a TIRE i '' �!!*•�� ����_ 1 I I Ii P wixa .P•JOs a e•r-iZ�-- IP - ~T• IKR u•aM • N�•\►e.---Otl—i1IpI -tea=�h r..f= �'_ _ � � P��S, R . eye eroas — _- = = _`_\I. r - r -11.. �_� O �' I.ALL iLOPV DAVITS ro 6E \ •/i i:::!!1 ��1.3 _ ♦ maYC 20 70 SAANTAFr ARrR ci O 7.IICNnPE rooms DRAINS ro . PARKING LOT STORM DRAINAGE tI y.•. •�,•�\ J I a �R. ccwlErANCE snIEN. \ A I�: -� CS rs rm§•--As' , S�.q rly r f7 '�-� ',LC-. ;° TOP 1747 1 - Q a"• - • CLEAN OUT ^ 3 4I ' q,� -- 1 `17'-e•CPEP O 1.25X c : Iae [�� c ®,,PIPE, : h�oEr'.tt , S �1 -{IIII....J{W 4.. _ _ I — _ SrNv G. TRe !,E • - yj► — — Mar a uR u PRa99ED f +1� �'.7 •631,i -��' stout .m.uovrc m[wr we e'1LE ALK 1'a %---.-- / _ te'-1 a •4eef . SCCnOt MA nw/lWSll Ir-�%i•,` p ,w SECTION A-A �"DE wf„ T. TREECE&COMPANY INC. a 1 TT"(I• �• I. - •- 'I f E: *Lc to w,w Po xvuow.a�4uET Ms NOT TO SCALE W/DEBRIS eARRkR--- —_ • .'iNrAt p� SHEET• is 1100 m /a. r'v°""rCa ara°'is. I Ew•cx"' I CITY OF RENTON E 8'C R00 PPP EX.12"SO PIS � i/�////i 1'62 y7 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ------- 1 -N „0„, mw.crz0..»rE IL,m.k Uf 5A51GhFD ANDLDA7ID PACIFIC GULF PROPERTIES ejPPPngrn,r111111fIrr„rpp��•••, a.novm ia rE°x.STORM se TYPICAL PAVEMENT SECTION GRADING AND STORM ..'.` OESCO PLNO(SR a ANY Par N Riu[ OM r •14f MOD sea am An- ■4P�R VAULT AREA °pOVE`a' oF3[%CPENOEI a A WOO-ow•am rare d an VW= aa. AO OM./rAAb DETAIL, arr w.sAw maws vua moss ••+ • - sure '-v0' ., w APm a Y. rw .wam ...+.w,� WOO 3 on • • CORPROOM 1� 1Sr. =. _.ram . t--—L -- — r� I— 1I— \ III I ili C0 Na°M"0°D , - �- I_ r \ - I W Al TASSgrr2r.VAALA OMUUG,. i �_—•— \ 1R Pill I �•- .2 \ _ xy ate..,, a on \ •4 A II�) A- [PerYARR Mt�f1W-TR I �IIl11 I III- \ %4 \ '"I 1 y _Y WC MO.a1WaW.WMO \ -_-- rMER • `PTPIIS �` \ t 1 II \ la \u\ ✓ I 1 \� \ `:. Nil +\+— — �_ -- R a \\ \ to iiiii 4 l Ml9 rY'�•-'444&SB PO N 00.,0, LT .. _ s- I��J.uoa aoD er ° ' ,�e°P % - L --- _ 111i' il I1 \ I-/0 u•BLw I V®.� 41NG e' 1 s•L,W 4�fl 1 0/�/%� Y// \, \ __=.) \-�IYrCpIG a OGYMa1 • , --t- I 1.��1i ___,, J.J6 0a IOOa'�R . ,-�'- --A- �%'%! `` 1 e t-ro• r¢ ��QQ 2J'-r -a.:,a'fi.it 3z c-r- _.;.,- .. •� i T T^za----r tal'M5 R( '1 '��- -�=•II I�. � ,-e•GAIE vu� � a1 q� l \ NI CQMF BVIVI JI my .•MCYA M'VN 1 i 1 I j sr PrY PEa alY I MAUL WATER \ 1.1 T `S SMOG GOd Rr a a.BA00.a— 00•R_—®- \ «-`•?'gyp i� " ,r ts\ID•�..:'4' der t� RCN MT,S,D.CET f(BO.r 10 GTE VALE(N✓J (ASSENT(M.) "E stww LIFT k t�.�/--= I I I 0 M-NE 0 \ ARCN PLANS • J.1aaP0.0,QOO'Rr I 1.OdICSDO$fIPWKr ✓dt) -� ! I-f0'GAS YALK II.Sa01 a00 RT ^r+� I /--- I I \ 1-II I/7'BEM(W ( METER . )\ •.. G r'VALE(f1.YJ) , �1� r-10•ae•TEE(LNBIU) `` I-10•15•BEND(Y✓) I .„ x.,�r.J 1 III(I- '.. d M`Y.,ry xW/cc-.6LOFINGI I' q�1 IIEIIi SORM:[` !DONC.ENOCIavc ;MOM src p..w FPI/ ' II%oac v�ALa (n.Y✓) ,�I 1Y/mVc ecce,mVc y. II`'n �� I Y I I \ - j�� �IEALpc�floCF GRANS � i M/QYa NCR ONG I I Af a (�J /�/ I'1 I lw• rt FRO I (TO or SANITARY D 1 \ FFF 11100 ,,[[ I p. r ,` ' I I I ro orMrARr SERER I •\ / I RN IS 01.0a aD0 A ,. N 11 1 wc�ov 1 I I C% I l/ r �'/ -,y • f-IO.u•BEM Oa r; 1 r�. 1 1 hUNE TO BE co�y � i II„• A ' CRID LAE IY--J/ parr LIB i N (BY maw BOUNDARY / SN• P W CapYC BL•• ) I ✓ 2 c• I.I I i'r i ' 125 �"�(gE ARI2L"'T"✓ (sE ARCH'MANS) = AaArs1YENT DIRpXi'1'^ GD LANE 25 RI T I r i !I� m. T t lila' II., t car or R[r''''' 1(Ra ARpt ELAND 5a...75755.4 r+va[ . 1ElE� f -Y ---'- ! ' E°°' I - ai is mnI �� we 1 I �--__ ,:: / Au I P `\ Jd 1 1.:. / • ksve ] - I�I' In Il. : / -ta• a'. y+� _ a, [144011.1'0107°-" , 1 1 r i,¢1 g , I •C �L,.N ACCESS EASOCRY x 89® I ' A4 • `/ (' , ` A / c ,i �w1. Ipp22R�• .a1 �I- -v- / ) "`E�."'o; i�IroT I 1 ill nil 'li sw`I�•� "1 •-c: - .✓ do rzw Wr) 7f li— �y� \i�io`:i•Barl�m fw✓1.TN a I 1 \\`\ I �� � S 1 I I;•,v3• Rt'q:= /(`.14I.:'°I�B77 _ • E ,F ,�� r •0ys- sire'woo c env I n s2,w a„ Satre� ii I Pi I� YAe'.41 '; a - e BBP.re. r ,• ►'~•MIr s�w s!c�A.sRY,; % u+n D.ao•aT ?} - Ij2N7"' �2Y%I'�.. ►-� - '.f/ ; ( �� ra:r4a1aaD i-s'R (LN✓L1 E,16,..,1�•,,,d �22MRLv✓EASE . -ID'11 r/2 BE • / (rt.wl w wa A3.�i: ., �+..� :�»� „Alum- _.. - C INN- W/I%22K BL r/Ca4C COMIC •' it .. _ F �w+.+�wWln wy.". \� } -NC 0.L OLSf ex I I 1. ,L lBBNRY!! T.5 _ ..I -..I ,..�r�� • _.-,.Y L I �I ^ r.0a PLOD'RI - • _ T .n „, I . _! �Itr w/r J �A C __�.---- �•�[i%) r-Ie'.lo•xl:r TAP -�_.__ .... :_; wxrr • E w r j ----I-ra ilo•TAPPNtl TEE((YJ_iIL-.--_ ••,•,myl -'Y �^ I .e xlN r• a �- I i I I 1 a I I-r0•GTE VALE(TI.XJJ -IX;YARN EX -AOL-_ ADJUST EX VALE f 1 W/CONC.BLOCIOnC eavtru-we f1£Y TT-Y N --BO,ES ro EINISED L12 ,,,..,... LIND AVENUE 8W IMTa2A BDd R •-IN c,.FCOWEND R �I 1 2 ,....• _ MATERIALS BY COVIRACIE1P- BApOLOw V,LL1F l "-- GRADE(MJ c rCA�'R•1Ory 1 r-Ie1r0•BET IN! -T-IO•?1'BEiq- . _mo ritar'-APPROKD ire-TAP W le.'-0 W.Dore[a 00wn ry _ - r-IlSId rAPPMO MT yDBNe B[apu.B - ` _J F- -=R.M.._'-.-SQ ccmA cDON I OErAA BELOW ___...e•E II.20(WI) -.. - _.-.. __. _- w/Cpla DLY ALVE(rINFL.0.. • x�_I•� �.1 QLW}RACTOR TDKRwY LOCA _ -_ �(YA IECIALS eY IXWTRACTOR - • _ Alp ELEV.a Ex e•SB SUP �- -- TPA eY 1TY.R2R019 k.CT-F� 7�� toe-taTRACTanJ I -r LEE li)'AtEL - r •_,1 o{I /(y� - ' `�1- • 1 CCIM Homer(wacR,-NEE II �: 1 ," I NOES WATER MAIN CONNECTION DETAIL) I. ALL MEW OUCTICE IRON PIPE AND FITTINGS SNAIL BY POL KMELENE MRAPPED. SEE WATER("WY NOTE a FOR STANDARDS AND SPCCIRCA DONS. 2. COPIES OF ALL RELEVANT OTY Or RENTLw STANDARD PLANS SHALL BE CONNECTION I CONNECTICC 1 PRONGED ro cavomcrM PIM MC PRGECI comsro rnom DOCUMENTS MEW w•INTER-1RR�SEE91RI I FOR PROFILE OE SANITARY SEMER. - 1 /o i10•KRDCAI CROSS NMI) A[W 10•MA WNW.KWIC.CROSS(Y✓,a) 3 I. ALL'lam GRAMS glut BE EpVNEETID r0 THE SANITARY SEVER LME 1 1-10•BIRO FLANGE(ON TOP Or ►•#1 I-10•MIND FIANCE(ON TOP OF S ABNMUY COHEIR FOR r0•WATER HAMS 9,ALL BE!FEET FROM FINISHED GRADE. E1PpPMY--►IdE CROSS)W/2•AP f 2•PLUG TOMORARY�.10'S CROSS)W/1'AP tr 2•PLUG )Id BLw,O FIAII(E D T 'W GOER SHALL BE 1 fE£T. 40pONO -1 or CROSS) al BOTTOM COMBO 1� IO�KAD stANCE(W eDTTOW j, R B. ALL NEP SERER IAMBICS 9w9N BALL BE PRIVATE. rrc T.-MAM ,-,D•PLUC(Y✓)W/2.w• ►-yT7•I T1 rs•YAM _ro-rL)c(Y✓)w/r TAP A F. 2 WIN i1RC FITTINGS ALONG lRM AENVE SW TO BE RCIRdinW —W \ !W- 2•ION.BLOW-CYT / 2•IEIN.BLOW-LIFE m o, F NM S•SICWT2 FITTINGS `/-le•.IO•TAPPING ME(SEMI) _W A' SEE RFNTON STANDARD P/AY$-SANITARY$EWER 1-IB•.r0•TAPPING TEE OWL) I e T TREECEN & COMPANY INC. SAMTARY MANHOLE BDJI W/QN14 BLVOC%II.G ) W CpA:(ROCKING O Fa1 ECEINO row ormondBCT 00 riorrorrf 10•GATE v AE MAW) s» MANHOLE FRAME AND CRIER 8026 / IIAL Ib• j CLEAN-Wr 8026 TESTING 11'VNiGj TES/PIG COWEC1py 9 rvilirfl wlir�in�IRritu,r�iN�4•� ✓; I-16•,l0•TAPPING TEL(YMfl) I-Ie•,10•rAPPMc TEE(SEMI) I cog.")')01 I CITY OF RENTON SFF RFNT/M STANDARD PLANS-WATFN I-10•CAW VALE(ELSE✓) I-10•GATE VALE(REIN) P. CONCRETE BLOCRRLO BOAS I-10.SLUE(MO I_10•STATE(W) DEPARTMENT OF PVBLIc WORKS ^ e•DETECTOR DOUBLE C Ea(VALE ASSEMBLY 8100 W/GONG BLOOM.° %CONC eIOL'NhG STAMP NOT VAIN - - - _ _ - _- - W FIRE NIIVIANT 8102 EX r5^MAN. (MATERIALS BY/ C7(N. —r TAPTBY CI BY PROKD MET Uh7FSS SIGNED AND DATED PACIFIC WILE PROPERTIES .•COPpAq METER SEANCE WON a BYPASS BIDE 1 TM Br are APPROIED eFr-TOP Ex IB•YAN TAP BY an APPROKD MET-TAP $ANRAR�'EWER ANC I10•GATE VALE BOB✓ w- w$B-COWIRACroP) A 8B-OCWMACroP) WATER PLAN E SEAL LYMINFCLGY -=aYLNE<I,ON __ l nT A/IA.W 2221E or PINY) �•(BY aTr) me ur NLID . / ^ .6 AA ON a'r2pA5 SW 4SINB-AVM memo Fr AM; WA .IIMwm NiI Ma r�� NM. MAMA OP ma • R - . I 'i • 19 T23N R5E W 1/2 ���\ SW 23rd Sti � ! 6 �/ice- � IH1 !I IH ,/ IL , I 1 W jth St' ! 1 CA R- SW 27th St. SW 27th St. J p ill n 1 �j 1 if IM RC ii SW 29 th St N ---"Ty r I ` NN I . ,, z S3II0th St. _ co i �— z M \ I , el , Ii N I CA tt • ' ' 'IL ,1 �i 167 34th St i ' 11 I SW 34th St. , \ SW 34th St.I IL ' ' I j , 14.i 'L IH ,// I -b a). //'� . .. i ¢ , ›, cu IL :� IM (\SW39th St. Q - u CA IL 7 ,i1 IM IM A, l st St. SW 41st t. , - o 13 - 31 T23N R5E W 1/2 ? .....20 4,0 H3 �. ZONING 184800 : °`'I um 30 T23N R5E W 1/2 •. .. ,.. CITY iF RENTON � ..LL Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator September 27, 2000 David Kehle David Kehle Architects 12720 Gateway Drive, Suite 116 Seattle, WA 98168 Subject: Modification of Approved Site Plan for Pacific Gulf Properties (aka 360networks) / File No. LUA-99-105, SA-H, ECF Dear Mr. Kehle: This letter is to inform you that we have reviewed your proposed revisions to the "Pacific Gulf" site plan. The site plan was initially approved by the Hearing Examiner on January 25, 2000. The approved site plan included a 98,752 square foot building footprint for an industrial warehouse/office building. The building would have four recessed bays with dock-high loading doors for loading on the east side of the structure. Based on the anticipated mix of tenant uses, 210 parking spaces were provided on the approved plans. The proposed modification would modify the approved building in order to accommodate the future tenant, 360networks—a fiber optic telecommunication company which provides data storage and web site "hosting" in a secure environment. The proposal would involve the following alterations to the approved site plan: 1. Increase in building height from 30 feet to 36 feet; 2. In-fill of loading dock areas and placement of slab on-grade for exterior generators; 3. Construction of 4 steel grated platforms within truck well areas for the placement of exterior mechanical equipment ; 4. Reduction in floor area dedicated to office use (from 40,000 square feet to 25,000 square feet), resulting in an increase in warehouse area (from 64,052 square feet to 172,504 square feet); 5. Change of exterior window panels to spandrel glass with a solid wall behind for increased security and use of blue tint glazing with clear anodized aluminum frames; 6. Modification to the exterior elevation for the main building entrance by adding 512 square feet in canopy area; and, 7. Addition of screening from the site's street frontage for generators and mechanical equipment. The Site Plan regulations define a minor adjustment or modification to an approved site plan as changes which do not involve more than a 10% increase in area or scale of the development, do not have a significantly greater impact on the environment and 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, Washington 98055 Ica • 360networks Page 2 of 2 facilities, and do not change the boundaries of the originally approved plan (RMC § 4-9- 200.H). The proposed platforms increase the approved building footprint by only 5%. The overall appearance of the building would remain as approved and no modifications are proposed to the parking, landscape or vehicle circulation areas. The proposed interior alterations to the structure have been determined not to pose any impacts significantly greater than those reviewed under the original proposal. In addition, the proposed use of the site as well as the amount of on-site parking provided based applicable parking ratios have previously been determined to be appropriate for the site (see attached letter dated June 16, 2000). Therefore, the proposed changes are approved as a minor modification to the previously approved site plan. The applicant is advised that all code requirements, conditions of the site plan approval and mitigating measures of the environmental review are still applicable to the development of the site. The applicant should also understand that Environmental ►r. (SEPA) Review would be required for future modifications to the site plan, including the placement of above grounds tanks with a combined total exceeding 10,000 gallons in size. This decision to approve the proposed revisions as a minor modification is subject to a fourteen (14) day appeal period from the date of this letter. Any appeals of the t admi st at'v decision must be filed with the City of Renton Hearing Examiner by 5:00 pm, 11, 2000. If you have questions regarding this correspondence, feel free to contact Lesley Nishihira at (425) 430-7270. Sincerely, _ //21G =GT"-4- Jennifer Henning Zoning Administrator cc: Parties of Record party Gilbert JYellow File . FRI k • . 6P1 david kehle August 15, 2000 City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, Washington 98055 Attn: Leslie Nishihira Re: 360networks (Former Pacific Gulf Properties) Lind Avenue Dear Leslie, We are requesting a minor adjustment to the approved site plan and elevations for the new user, 360networks. As has been discussed, 360networks is a fiber optics telecommunication company that provides data storage and web site"hosting" in a secure environment. They will need to do some minor modifications to both building and site to accomplish their needs. The following are those modifications: 1. Increase the building height from 30' to 36'. This is to accommodate the greater clear height requirement for a new second floor within the original footprint. This is still within the code allowed heights. 2. In-fill with dirt the existing truck well areas, provide slab on grade for exterior generators with integral fuel cells and provide screening from the street. 3. Build exterior mechanical equipment platforms (steel grated) which will be screened from th' ' trPet ThpSc will he located within the former tri!r.k well are2e and will he 20' x 50' at three places and 20' x 75' in one area. Total square footage will be 4,500 SF. (approximately 5% of total footprint increase) 4. The finished office area will be approximately 25,000 SF whereas the previous project had anticipated 40,000 SF. We don't expect this much office, buter this is what would be allowable by code. Therefore the trip traffic generation will be considerably less. The balance of the building will be of a warehouse type use for electronic equipment limited. 5. Windows shown on the exterior of the building may be of a spandrel glass with a solid wall behind for security reasons. The glazing may go to a blue tint with clear anodized aluminum frames. The overall appearance will be substantially the same. 6. Modify exterior elevation for main building entry. Create exterior canopy and full height glazing. The above modifications are minor in nature and do not: 1. Involve more than 10% increase in area or scale of the development in the approved site plan; or 12720 GATEWAY DRIVE, SUITE 116 (206) 433-8997 SEATTLE, WA 98168 FAX (206) 246-8369 Ms. Leslie Nishihira City of Renton Re: 360networks August 15, 2000 Page 2 2. Have a significantly greater impact on the environment and facilities than the approved plan; or 3. Change the boundaries of the currently approved plan. Based on the above, please approve these minor modifications. If you have any questions or comments, please call. Sincer- OK�i David Kehle DK/mt Enclosure: 2 full sets of plans 1 full set of pmt's cc: Barry Gilbert w/enclosure Tom de Wolf w/enclosure a:\0027\citylet8-9 .D Inc.•IOC„.r ill fr, 1 :EGK DEY_RPIgV .»1r[114 Ma•a!n 11 ,a as Rol n r_»-1w,. t.id04.11 E.tia 11•M11R1 ` - ��J m.W mfra/i'i•r 4(ORE 1M..rc.W., 1.I0R104 MVOS.no,11'51.NM a<»OK 4Y.Vr' wr 1 Orr V R•Q..,V•i„•TO .SUM.iWigdlt•Mr.tr'.1..41.1k0 Iv,.•/11 t+ ~ .a 5111,MX 1.i%.w f»ran p I•1KI r14[1.1w1 II!r i! Hgr tl MOM r IR. 1ID11•IA.WPM 4 r)e BNrR M MK tIT1 ip1 I.SDI Cr(0411D111n• M1.a441 0111.11[I..RIM I.MI 6•A111.1101• 1-V III 1A.10 ICU,rt., 'I-R4wR A,1»51 K..1wRIKN11K1 r04r11a I n II •/.rriw SIN41. WILE.VIM.If.1.VIM v 411.1U.Unit � I Ai 1�p1� j}� 1Bvf M•..t1',1'tr1. MU a. .141»,�•115 ./ I u [IO I D f'11.,0MK11.VKf. .1 :1MMrin 4u1 1...DOth..I101 101K I,L@) f ......DOM. 1 ,1[1161101b alpl•114'61Y S0 f,R[41rR1ID1,OM.A 11114 I I.OMR .O RID,, It. COMM,Or It•14,w.Mill t.r. 14.`••4.1 141•.1.MD.II.R1,r. It. r100H MOO all'.1.14;DCW1 41.1 MS,11.OfS!. 1 1tVI41f4U[t an.MIMl A,5.1 r .. a 1011•i,iM1•o1w1Oi1.R WC4[rt6o91 Slat A ROAM v r..tK 1i111r--}MMM"llll w KT..wits m1•.4 r,4 Ra 415.4Y�ant teR.e4 t1 P../ LOU 111.01 V.MI,.tr A..K.r1,1, vICMITT MAP "" „MRIiP.A14 IA1,,Na1N1(••-. �Ny bw 1M bY.YI I I .1 I1., 1 ��-"a .� �, �� ; IUHhI Y k rti `� � y.� _ !©1111111 n DP 4IEIE !!1Jf 3,,., __ J ; Th _ l �- s r1,.w.wn , __,. . -"i lit 1--- I� I I 1�� r !* 2 y�� A.YbR1J6 l%' ... j 1 1 i��� :./g4 41 1J/ t l •-■ :�.. .. K.�t-- ---'-r1 1 < EN4 I I�-- i7�7 c,v.J.w--,a,.i bI • 1:`R- -71-".h Ir t. R.r O 1 1 1 y - -= ' I ill LOCI ,iii I !, II PRO.OSED 13t,ILDIKr FOOT=RINT, 38,152 F. = a4 -- 7...-:- , ___ I '---- / ti !. 14..• Er f»t4 SECOND F_OOR: Q8,152•F.Is • ! a _. u.Mw•z -1� ,D41 s 11 15.1r•Wrote II I bil.MO -Mi S. t AID�.R 7l ma ova 1 I �I"watwttmlsr r- i • w t. �l.{.t���• .Io(rn4o 4o.044I �� i it MEMO rl,,,,41,.. `1''r. �� s , 1 • �. 1 - b�1.tb•w`KI fI1 r I/, sr mamma. II 1 i``h 111 i En, _'E -_ - I _ �.. 1 _ _ s I- pp II ro r W, ro 1 r a 11 Wit �k+�... �tl_� .1r.�71- E".� :'1m � my ./'-, ;; F.11 it I� 4": 1 .�� __ Y J'R • �� - •'.r--..Yi.•-� j i i i I Lill E. as I . ,...�Y c.».,.• sill .� --- _ -- - -I - ,.w1°". -._ - - - - 'a Z �• I ■ 6•wyt• 1k NlM II f LMD AVENUE I� L4ar - - - - _ nr Rsw _ • - - _ -►. . .1. a �. DaDas 1 C ‘� C c I icil 0 E- Nu co 4- \\ '11 II.- /i/ al, biN __ pMM WM•41....,1YMO.l [•a n maw ram lrmlRlc v. N T SITE PLAN x�` mre. j: ,i of SD-1 1 1 1 06/16/00 09:45 ryn CACP3\993CGu•_r.52-I.6. O O O O O Q . ® Q Q D u 4 Qn .r * c Q n n AM /ii i s 4' s 4J . T . , A . Q n Q .1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 I I s — — I+ I— _ — , I-- — . _.— — I� ©-� -1— I— I —I -4I1; 4— I— I I i I 1 i 4 .b„— I i ► 1 .44- �-- I— i I -4 ----- — I ip Dj. I. • •I 11 I' 1 a ��• -T ii —Till:— II ` ii i1. i 11 i I� ! I i i . i I-+a i'' lIII 1 I 1 I I '° ©illlll I OVERALL FIRST FLOOR PLAN4 $i 4 • rl.HT.J m.m M • 1�. o ���:� O . G �� C - T x T LiprA_: S ��iil • C� 1 �I I I I I I ! I I i I I I i r r I r -�-- I ii : o- 1 I —" , .I•� f f �'o (D-1 —_____i--I— —I — -I- — - —I — + — — —I. — � — — —I — -I- — —I — — -0 E. — 1 I — ! 1 — i — x ❑ - — . _ p a❑ C ❑ — t I — —0 .3 zZ C E i I I I i I I 0 o Ma 11 (51 4) r.:( i cit, I . OVERALL SECOND FLOOR PLAN A`1 0E/18/CO ,0:08 or. CnUO\0027.ETVOQc$‘.-Lcv 4.1!) . . (1) (i) (II) ,j) (i I a, t o 1 ,a, 4 4) i 10 1.1,.1 i n) ,I) tij) 1 • T i? . Ti , w , T w. I I OP I r tr 1 to I e sir • 1 le i I, *. * 1 t,,, I I : i I I I”. I• I r kW II I 1 I I I i / i 1 I 1 ' 1 I I I I I I I .I . I / I 1 1 1 I 1 I I . 1 • 1 ' I ., I• I 1 1 I . 1 I I 1 1 I I I 1 I I H • I I I . . I 1 1 I 1 9 9 I • i E I . . , . i .• EN CIAT L0.010 I O s.Z.-.' ....-"-I 1 • " ..... .. -......... un`"--I 1,13:2)177"'"7 tL3) p I I ii . I , pE ; , EE 1 PICO 0 E SLELECTIPC.A. I III PIMP 1 .<11E*S8CfR ISISER 1 . I I I I L_ . ',Oat I : I .1 1 • etr:46.;_1114..ltra52:119tr_.__._ 931_5l. 7.telK7Ett • 0 • - - - _ .1_ _ 1_ ____.!, _ r _1 _1 1 , _.__ _ _ ___i_ 1 1 _. rEzz. ,3•S.:SF SEALED COGRETE 9.00R .-iO4 SF SEIT-IEETED WALE 1--- - NEE,061•1'ser.to.u.,.71 atrieEs 1. ROO.•124.0.044 R-T CCCPAV LOPO Ill 000.1PAV5 1 il I I I i 1 I I , ! I ,7 ExIT6.7107.7 . 'nom CIVANCIf MX 40 AK • 1•042323 I e . ...._ ___ _ _t_ _ 1._._ ___I _ _, _1 _ ___L____ __f_ • 1 .ilR 2_,S404 041S.6.PT.PAFCR vs. 11 I TrECI-1-. M0,”E•gr'BER Occ4/1 •Ea C Ca 1 111g11111 t =,, I I I 1 1 .1 I ! I . I . ,sp. I /-1114.00.4 54%SELER 4.11..) . :e ce i t- _ ,,,„ 'i 11 ,x. . ., p t --1- -, •-:r! -.-1 1 j ! ,,. 2.WV OYER•ESL v•••CR BARRER I-' • s .4: f s': 1.SP:AD CHER 6 MIL 42.C12 BARRIER--' (II ' ri' il:' ti, 'Lit, ' . • 3 p. E Il I'.,- ,t 7.; 47,a,,,..../.... 1 aye 6.FREE OPLW*4[WAAL 1'YERECAL R-10 /TAMER NPEATCS1 • ' . * i I i , . • ' . . ' , : , , OYER 6.ME:R.S•44 GRW.I. 7 AV'7.S1 A.S3 •ERPETER PlEd.al 0% . : ., r 2'AMP,R-10 ElEerztEn 144-ATICJ ' R , n.. •. . • • 1 . , .,... 0 • 4 • •' , , A , T O eq - 999,. •99 eik.99e.t..se m er=====T.. ... .93.4. 1 II" alp. w 44*CD* 44:0==.44 ,••--\., -'. , I- . /Fs..• • 1 r I I. 4,-1_ , 1\__G•mytec,tt,1 . , _-- • • I , '%. . , , I I-GENERATORS I 1-1. I I c.4 I ' 1 I. I • ,I ' I-"'; . . I i I ,-Lames ! 1 I , 7:4.); I i I , \ ! 1 r4 ! I I/ I •I I\ ! 1 1 i V ALL Y 1 I ./ " \.... I . I 1 I 1 2r, u.r 4T ; ,. ., ... ,..... I I !V.11 911. .4.--.. - ..-......1......... . • • I . 4%, 114. •-•• -I- . IN .• e ,•-- , s ,,, sr .„ w r w .. n. (1) / ® I 1 i,_ rn z 0 E-, PERBY,TLY ZI2f11,41,24 .C 1209ft60102iLE 71012Ct Ei) ,4.-, ,,,..4,.....p,Dom.44,444,4,...g rail a„.„,,....,„a.,„„e,.„.,c, .......S*ACE*60.4011:'EEC IECT:r 6•CES ••• X 92.0R•400041 CLCSER tel•FRCI 11:4EED• 'Y..'W,L MATED 4 MGM Mr W S.01 /••cEE to.rum evett'ou.avE 44,3 4:11.r., I PARTIAL NORTH FLOOR''LAN CYLHDPI LOC.,VI'904043LD.SEANEWTRIP C04.149,0N PENES 3 09 t4*PURR 1.1 OPP*. V Seako',2 4-V le!! -11 .... V) E/Earrcti mem 044E1 41111 pal*c.o.,. (070e.7..7.,1.1.11147ED,)PPM 4 1431rOSTW PC0010 NO LOAR-um Mill 440 0 641•114 DCOR TO MS..*OW-004ED MRS* PAPERY 13804J.*ID EGRESS L 11•14 CAPABLE OF PREyE*114 4EAYPID MOVE 44 DEG[ yl, BMW 140WW.14114110 CLAIM rtwekl BIERYAWDel 001,4:4 TYE 1941ELC*E WAX PIT'S ME Z AD POL.CWS MOTE SEE SSEET 4-S P74 MOT MAUS*./..:. (2) WA PUPS I SR 904EDLat: •••... .-1 . TE sew 40 SECTICALL OS'04011 DOCR *DCA 1/•eV rprh R-10 9-1042YENT,PCTLOWS PAMPA LIM EOM LATEX NELWRENE DOCR co WW1(PANT DCIERIC*1 BRO*06140 SINCERE*AI MID•1-1 14....ATCY4•804 NI 0 NOP VICK C., SW M TW*DELON MEI AL DOC*W Wald YET X MPS MOE DOC*4 MESS*Mt MO 0.01 VS PERLIEER 1•44•14,1*MPG IBIONDED RI all WE • 0 Mt*./INGES.WWI,.PIRENCED MAP.1.71 cwr_g&rem op•yPPOR EARAIR VL.MVO NUM COW CAR L0014,1410,IIPATSPISSIPP 24 IIISL WU CO rj 01 Gamma+10.x war 5E0044.OVERSEED .134.TTG U.L ISE Pew r-ED OCER•mu'rronesitrt owe r‘1111057.LW/SLOE LAIC*KAMM .404.44E.4..o.ABLE ILLVT.P4 FRC..MEWTSEE IS 0 1116 DOOR ECYTOVEANT 10014010 I 0 x ell. Rest SILOS 00t E01E*051.44.c mar'0&WM C• 01.0411174 DOOR PLOP Dom CE WTI il• 13 14TTS PER 04E44 POOT461 C•BAD III PEREVIR PC: VW.TUBE EEBF.R.A1Bt RAMP/ .41:104 LC1 40 0010011 MIAS 4 CIO 1075*ER !OWE 0000. A-2 suREI4USE upwr•o: 93.1S1 V X CM•41316 EXTS 410100 EwERI05.4.4,14, 1441 J II 1W1•NNW LARS Or S•1.Ph;•:dap*ins TOTAL VIER CR•40•3114,112 013/13/00 'O.20 5',, Co.C417‘002274ET vCEK 2\A-2•D'S . . 1 iso ,:i...) (i...,,, ... ,.. . . vr V • I T T / i'. ' T t 1 ,:t I i I I I I I oio 1 URSA=• SEALED _ _ I TD/V AO MAX 1!DEGIeE!s I I I I Rac•RIM STOW R.e I I-1«INTVlLD: M I f I , *0420Tr . 1 1 1 t — , — — — .P`C�! - - -- 4- -. !TIN r PIPE ea MO n-.El DOb* I t 1 ®IN® • 470:Ar14.1.77SaARRJA.- • I '...ARAB' •. A•matill:Lli •ini:.•'AA.;-- — I . '''. ' ' • ec uirA.GENIErvi i f It f ec�En w muc { i i� i i i'‘ 7 4? r '•'� 7'lArp Ov£R b Bk.vdxblR N.l•aERJ Ur�r )y�• i i •'�--i1 lv.^O.Ev a RA vaYA IAFi�ER-// • F. .._ I it• S OKR b•9el DRAW./A000L ./l/-!.`.V�hl/`/�/'�• OVER b RtEE DL.l4 itdvEL i I _._ R I �YW RAM �< I ' I 1 .W 11RN 1'YER1iCAL R-V) 4ER'IfA R.N f---._ - S. I I REAM'ERNBLATIGh ? REtrvEER ANLA'IO. 57: I I II s ' j1 Wf�M• . M ROR Lam, .. ...316.,, = .,. ...i1 I I�� ,. I I\J i I ,•z<i1 I I I OwR o o I 1 •.�I 1I i_. A.� Rxr exb..0. 1I is •.r ; ..r y..e•� I , t :D h H_._.+__._-s__.._4.. a__- a.. r 1.Rv ar_-� WDER Ti BARRIER FREE RESTROOM PEFeir V / R. / V. • I / a xAIE r/c r Z1.e Ro•A� r C11 a I V •'i V OVERALL FLOOR PLAN I )W - A, et xx Ida Dose uno A4RTRM e•NE O RRE IDOR NER TYPE R.A ar RC RATED, ear w•.r.y SCALE .It O V MLR A.OpaDRR CLOSER reu•ADI M]MED{ •it mono Er,eer+:VP Ar r A-1 CttOOEC WAN'iNeeeULD.SEL 010 0*R < Ev Barron ewe...cm eae nu re ww. El w 17007 E 11Pw1ED n i15 Le .•RL� SYN•IRS DOOR ro MR.WCORD WRNS C.ATTEt.WOW RC[dEN Len. z BU REN IWO..RR41ED GLAD.•N•abl /JP� RAR.eD!>•.b ��- a o r X 4,0416U1,01.4.a,Ew*AO DOOR I ,_ R..EIe Tan DrR.aT M 1111E110 r�1LMtIUfS1.0(00*MIREWon UM , 0 Rut.ura C F au +eD we O Z O u eR xA IUl1W IMe DaORN Or ON ' ► I .ro wew Arl C�7a An TART g0000.•.10 HMV.•o M{IN u� *0 RYR Vt.WOK K 704014.11Ree.XD OtA N•{ ArM11Dl PIP ur.LAia awo.elAnEnOTPP D CO/su1124 E!N x 110%e[C1ICRRL D0Dt*AD GOAD''WI DOOR)ERr�C.1L LIRA ROE LAKE WOMB! —�-- 'w•� UNDER Ti 00 1p0R0M '"rtD"L°Le4""R" 2 TYPICAL RESTROOM SECTION PE�•n1 wu0e Me,Don GAGE DOOR C{ETM v i e1E$TOE SERUM 1RARR1{a r�AtA D ��'sea.Ir I SEDDON A—3 oene/co 10:01".R CACAO\0027NE1VDRCS\A-3.0\ 0 ,—._, ____i MI 1 I 5E• I % IVA 1 I = is 1 1 linib I I i P I d I I G 1 i 1..1%/KAN i t . 1 I.L.A..=1 51.0CP to . 6-6.855../Sur NEPPIC6*.r ET IOW,d9 arepus f POO,1.1%,APPIP.1 0 • 7— . _. P _ ___t ___ _ _1 _ _____. _ _ _ —1 • t . 1 1 I IT I ® --..-. 6 —6 I I EXTERIOR PECNAPCA.KAWCW EXMOOR mic.ale.m.III•dreClel ini;A a. ir- 1 r 1 r- % I I i 11 - • 1111C11 1 ,,,iv I E5 0 • 3 i 0 • • •— 96 6. 6.• 1 ..6 .••• 6 66 • •• •• A A a0 CINDPS DEIN_I 1 _../___,1 •-•-•-• P• ,,, r _,_. . se __ —........... ..7i• h E; 0 0 17±) ( I Q_S) "n1 I g 9 T.I PARTIAL SECOND FLOOR PLAN , p v. 31 • 6., g 471:::See•/6 ow 6-enii : KIT SEE 56EET 6•5'OR DAM'CAM.4,_ SPICKEND V 190 oars a ? T ,i) 1 Ti Ti5-) 53 * Lii) I Ti 10,10. I ,i1;. ,t," 4.11 4..011 I .Ga. 0 LKW- I. J., tr, OOP IC . . 6,1 PIP a.1r ---..---- 4 . I _ ... I I 6 it I I 2+-s, 4, Gdf•..OP 0*COM OVVI .1.11030 hillUrai Cn o I—*L. — — - I- - I I \ k / -le I 1 , I I L3 c , G 10-11. Milt 41s.41 I I i MI \ I I I ..k ‘,... Cr *.p. —.... .. P ar•sr I I 51' I I P Z ,....-se, saes "'i4. 0 . ir, P. V '---® r-se sr, itc.:1)s 5C IP 66 41..sr I P..' .1.., ,1,, ‘,.., ,..1.. .... re r 0 .1.... 4_,c C ..... ..- CD L. CO Q IMO PANT 1 ';1 I I 1 I (e) IP .51 ,9) (ti! (23) J. IV (i,' I. I 101C,I) (3( r' ROOF DRAINAGE PLAN =:! != 1.. A-4 V.6..10.1PMPLOVIVA in.4; LW...VW a MK 0,41,IP. .CA-11 I.•MT 05/19/CO 1o:21 o•In 0\CAD\0C27NE`VIIIRKS\A-4 0, 1 r v v v E s • 1 I I I l i i I t1 J I F Q R COW DC. I C FLOM SEALED CONCAVE 9.00e I I RM..lAtED or.,-, 1 1 Ur A avl IN► k A k I I I . iMERv TAI SE,FO 1U<.6[AGREES E I I ROLE M.LAaCR R., j CCC1►AM LOAD IIOCCJNA T��1 ,� ,� b ivrEL Dar Y.q.w.WC MC -f ,�� j I; �OC.1515 i 12 I I I I '4 ,I E.: ' i - - — — — -- ___ __ =-� —r ,--© MICA , • E t119001 FCWNCAL RA1EOR1 EXTEICOI'ECOS(CAL'LA"0�' r� r� r1 t� in a I L J L J Li ■ z . 0 qR 1 I1!) 7GwF, ,.. = a m P CD —f •.-.—. © Fri I r r � s. • a • s i r I 1I .a 'f ws �i/1`. • 11 i PARTIAL SECOND FLOOR PLAN •� c E- 2 z tfk d µ U 0 z 3 N -� C cit F oz • 0 ma A-5 06/16/C0 10.09 am L\CAL\OCEENEi v0aK5.A-9.C\ t. • 4 I / •KW• -OP CPL'REK I r�dy, I (;si I j '' KOEAL-. 4,A.4.1 1 .144 i ail I .. . # ,: t I Tip 1 s. I ,,-, .E rl•�:N _r. ,. A ,,- ,1 ;: I f FEET Li1Iff1Ht1I • MEMiial r1N I11hIiH1l _ "{ • rit, '+ , a 4 I.':'t It . ,1 >7e,?4;.. 1 a .x. iy nit Fri.•s I qii0 -,.;n dI i j \ 1.1 � Nlllili�� :;., E�M•IeYliEllElElY� 6 Ien rc. L ...n�vr t_M- i LLONECI'P �,C..E�,a- p gg WEST ELEVATION SOUTH HALF �''`"9e E 1 1 1 1 PANTED 0.6MIW --W.I. : E U' NSLAEC SCALE Pi.I-Ir _w1e-_••• Lrr PANTED 1Z'�COADKTL _ jI 0 0 f 0 0 n1.L c.•xES MN 1 — 1I i ,�A REVEAL ,� I tt1Y Ai G.u[e—. j I y II �} . --- - -- + • tI IjL Ar. S-st I n eDw t I ! a d .Y' t + , I t �t,a.,.1 - - + �) TAr t;,•AyMT• , c.-r.; Y .II::.,. •.,a III' i, 31 • 14*`.o.4 1 I I 1JJ9i141t( ��ltl !•t-, Wit' 9L .. i !t li l':C t 'I��I �!��r.•? - ti MYr -, i4."17HiB i tl'W71'III;I trFa xilt'N 1:IDI raft';I'I A 6 MI I P•u I I I I ' ' Y._ . n_s � �vAi k�El ,. 1 k 437 ® iI I �• I . . inn '�:.1 . L . ! t 1y vg Lenr.DO Ea•rt OM ALUMNI,roan - ---- - MAN NM,.-. ACCEM WO RAY!CLEAR,W LONERS 1\T. L' 1 MORE 0Lme taT•"PCOCIKIE•y EPIL.LTED P.NrzDM.A..0 WEST ELEVATION NORTH HALFM I-PYYEDr,AM•IG LYLMLAFE DER, FAMED TILt.U* zALE !n••t-C ! FAME:.•t-•A• COOKIE 0 j f CaCKre 0 a 5rg• Qs. KK4 e cy �' T I .VIAL dR 3 ■��wilinimmilmilmmi 4, r �' . ��� , Pe ' �M ,.11- !Li aEmmaimmim= toil- r. I ' 'I'.__+i-g.: 0 11•t I V2,`� 1:'( � tl iqmionmil :,�� vr.e11 h'� , •'• rIY.. ..KnrE�� 1� si'xc:ealn Ye I '� ✓'•Ur RICad sMC.0 1:.I'AV ACCEs_BYO--_� ._—A...,...„,A...,...„,YfDR AL r.A•E rCLEWY i ACCENt PMD MAY rCLEM.Y I 19 et! ,04E O.Ae► I LT.IF COCKTE✓ ew9e GLASS • • 7 PtlL.ATED II.I.IP C?YrE'E Ir LA•MDAPE PERM TOMCATS., NORTH ELEVATION LA.•.SCAM GEC, • SOUTH ELEVATION CCLD. RLL Ef9CCN ecALE w•,.o. PANTED 0.6lNw _:xE:NV•I-r ,rl WM MceLL•-+DDREM rPAMED T LT-1 C 1CIK?E DIY'OC DAME�J f l•J 00 1/ IEH4� I .(^' + � ACCEa'61•D f.E.L`••MYMEI ROOD IR t I y 1 I �1 • I , ;4y A I I 1 1 — Crlz i> i Ii .� 0 Rho.- . — YR IW -e. �'z EAST ELEVATION NORTH HALF I.) d x R PANTED A5•14 rPYITo TAT.W CQ{KE 0 0 0 0 0 0 !? 0 G 0 O I 4V ' I 1// ..VEND i I z 4 \ I a. z I 0 + I I I 0OF co c=4 . 1t1 i • \<p1 III T 1 RAM 17 EAD M E OVERKA,V �RPVK ME.4.0 I TMa DDaR •TUN 000A 1 HN DOM EAST ELEVATION SOUTH HALF A—6 VILE,w•• •0 0e/1e/00 09.II an C.\CADLCO27NE-ORKILA-6.D.. CITE. )F RENTON 47, .di K411 Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator June 16, 2000 Ledcor Properties Inc. 9655 SE 36th St., Suite 210 Mercer Island, WA 98040 SUBJECT: LIND AVE. & SW 30TH ST. —PACIFIC GULF BUILDING Dear Barry: I have reviewed your request and agree that the proposed telecommunications facility is similar in intensity to a warehouse with respect to parking demand. The Renton Parking Code does not address telecommunication uses, however based on the reported nature of telecommunication operations the demand for parking seems to closely match that of warehouse and storage buildings. Although telecommunication facilities are not identified in Renton's Parking Code, I recognize that such uses are unique with respect to parking needs. Telecommunication facilities seem to require a considerable amount of floor area to house the technical equipment, however only a minimal number of employees are needed to operate the facility. Based on the information provided to the City on the operation of the proposed telecommunications facility, it seems appropriate to apply the warehouse and storage building parking requirements of one parking space for every 1,500 square feet of 7ross floor area. Please be advised that future users of the building will be subject to a parking analysis prior to the issuance of a business license or the approval of a building permit. If based on the parking analysis it is determined that the parking does not meet the requirements of the code or if the parking is inadequate to serve any future user, then any permits or licenses will be denied. Document2\cor 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, Washington 98055 If you have any questions regarding-this information please call me at (425) 430-7218. We look forward having your business in the City of Renton. Sincerely, Jana Hanson Development Services Director cc: Laureen Nicolay Lesley Nishihira Document2\cor riiw. • ,• . S david kehie architect August 15, 2000 1.06 F'`r•c-• �p��6N - 0 1:1, City of Renton O•G° 1055 South Grady Way Renton, Washington 98055 Attn: Leslie Nishihira Re: 360networks (Former Pacific Gulf Properties) Lind Avenue Dear Leslie, We are requesting a minor adjustment to the approved site plan and elevations for the new user, 360networks. As has been discussed, 360networks is a fiber optics telecommunication company that provides data storage and web site "hosting" in a secure environment. They will need to do some minor modifications to both building and site to accomplish their needs. The following are those modifications: 1. Increase the building height from 30' to 36'. This is to accommodate the greater clear height requirement for a new second floor within the original footprint. This is still within the code allowed heights. 2. In-fill with dirt the existing truck well areas, provide slab on grade for exterior generators with integral fuel cells and provide screening from the street. 3. Build exterior mechanical equipment platforms (steel grated) which will be screened from the street. These will be located within the former truck well areas and will be 20' x 50' at three places and 20' x 75' in one area. Total square footage will be 4,500 SF. (approximately 5% of total footprint increase) 4. The finished office area will be approximately 25,000 SF whereas the previous project had anticipated 40,000 SF. We don't expect this much office, buter this is what would be allowable by code. Therefore the trip traffic generation will be considerably less. The balance of the building will be of a warehouse type use for electronic equipment limited. 5. Windows shown on the exterior of the building may be of a spandrel glass with a solid wall behind for security reasons. The glazing may go to a blue tint with clear anodized aluminum frames. The overall appearance will be substantially the same. 6. Modify exterior elevation for main building entry. Create exterior canopy and full height glazing. The above modifications are minor in nature and do not: 1. Involve more than 10% increase in area or scale of the development in the approved site plan; or 12720 GATEWAY DRIVE, SUITE 116 (206) 433-8997 SEATTLE, WA 98168 FAX (206) 246-8369 Ms. Leslie Nishihira City of Renton Re: 360networks August 15, 2000 Page 2 2. Have a significantly greater impact on the environment and facilities than the approved plan; or 3. Change the boundaries of the currently approved plan. Based on the above, please approve these minor modifications. If you have any questions or comments, please call. 7 Sincer- ittot David Kehle DK/mt Enclosure: 2 full sets of plans 1 full set of pmt's cc: Barry Gilbert w/enclosure Tom de Wolf w/enclosure a:\0027\citylet8-9 Iti au MI NO SIR MnNNg9 -EGA DESCR'Pfl'N I. RDIK C• n S,u0l 0 9XR*P41 Xq.W-91-:,F91a. •-] 2.WIG,O utllU 10131A01, NCR •W F905rA0•.A1 S[aIML,;M0C9 MW[dM'Y ,.muvG mlAaa•rort,er >• SIa,nc M�r-�� ROW KW - , ai e1V0o. u Ott a PA'VM.OWN OF MF5 PAR Cr I.LMOS [9W IA00RS,FORT. MK 110 L01 ION•36'3 or. SIN IOC 4M IOC 5.SIR AI.. Am6 126ry.101 0 KI XIM6 K1Wl tr. 66 L119IIG A4.A� 0.1IM,91,,4 O 1l0 00IDArt IM NIAL SIR1 / SON RIDI, 9I.,4 4 �jg 1'11 F d ,.TON O WGIATIM. 6•IIN,(L (1 2.631F➢.000 �1 I.u4 vssmu,nl, r-vFta ua6m Ie.m r.,oe6 Sr SI-Mal=IR,531 5r r-FACTORY IXW/KMIKB PO WI& 9.XW14 MUIR � m1a,LIM CM.1.3/1000 MAY 11t.6S,n/112 • I i II'X 9'SI. W410.R•I/1M 15 -6'Y[StW uMfACr';(g 0X,1 L'Yx MSYiI6 a e 1M.ROM OW IpIK I ]� 11.M014 00x, to IIYOR S 11 RIL 1n4OKI1Vn A'CLEAR t0 SixLN[rt100.ORO.35 MK Il. SP1Y11 AREA In,III S.F. 19. MOYNr ISLAM.MN.16,320 S r 15.LMOSFNC 401140 120'.MIR4 n{01 COr CUTS./13,919 S.F. 16.1CIAL LaISGOC 12XC.10:S 6E1.0 EAS9EM)39,539 S r. RR•I/AnINIWI 0 Cr 491L000 SIRS IS MIRED IX OTAK WGSGVIK Wlai IS[IK ACIOMIm MOIX 41uy VRO0 26 IUwm`Xla 4 : t"` .`. 5`.40 4' VICINITY MAP MONK LETS OFXR 6n Sr.MI.O 51 Cr NU WHIM 36 NOC OM RiwNS.F.FORI140LWSCAR. ' bw i+c1 ra x<e w O \ \ ----- / 11 . • oc II Awxlr ,001hO;,w Y-,+y 1111111 L r�A -- a em J AISAa - -.� arWO-_fir•.--i--_ _ 91f0f _ e6C9 e0S1aAXOm A� lz • 1 ,, ii....,..____„, 4�fl �X-- � �' °Xi ^ ,I�x j k ^ or rc • Yi 4/ " . " I} c,..44In:s.,. " 4 • •ri k� �� 16' A 16' Y�',IL__ 1. 4.r • • -, I. l• Cl. I\ G,,Ku y ILIt 1 PROPOSED BUILDING FOOTr'RINT: 98,152 F. — !— "' 1 axe g a SECOND FLOOR 98,151.F. k — r/"O°�w .1 I Ioq Iml.o6101 61ele 19 SO4. . =t4. l i _u>aMl..�.4,, s mown 11 ��Mf101 WL 1M IX lo'Oleo.9W,<9u4, rA1.M -�91'4111' A rune Ant: L' r}� OR MOW rwAo"wa1° 4, ISM r 11-r. ( I El I �.I���. _ aAo�ttrnlr 1rv�r s' i r+olxra ! v. 131 o. 1p. i, 11 _.. MAsw16� 4 Ye' =I "� w �� y •I��~ , Mlil ' it , IOW I 1 1:1 'C iigle6', felliblEia 1 t r�� w.ar E. 11 ' I WA?" • am w.4 :'Fa ' ®r .xx..�x_.�,, `��` I I I I Ix °"�� Iwl I I•�` " "�� *, ,.e.„I � z 1 IocL--_ VI n YI II I a.OM g-t- -�_ _ `� N - walk �7 fri `ellww w. �-- „`�L�y "•v 3� 6 ` d.AT'•,1 ar.X :.��' ` (R-I 01196' I l ,xIY C �1�8�/I����,Ix /.• ® L.we 1 0 • •Ilitft 1��1� M`9T,/ALT 1C— .. -- — L.wv n.. o`h'w I111 /� 2� LINE AVEMIE AI 6l9 - - - =21IdEr,Nyyu - - 0 -, .,.R.n/S 14 (I) F-�1 x+- �I C 0 O w O_ U aclmlu —. :• • �_—x"t91+r •, ` 0z opus --:*c _LINO q N UE 1 _— m W `\\ T1� /- i em -'-- a - o :� In : •1 / •01.1•191r9.Bear IN SITE PLAN j SD-1 r.2• --11 ; III 1 - ,00 I • 08/16/00 09:45 am CACAO\9830GULF\S8-1.dxq . • OQ OAS It ° / O �1 Q Q I I. e I O O : 4 I - O} � t e- , _ - — P t Q I -F — 0 o G t _ t J ❑ I o- 4- — ❑ — - - 0 1 -I— H- — 0 E a 14 I 1 FA 0 4 I ,� — o -� — o - a ti 1I — _ o- ° + — — 0 o- — �.L -- } — H 0 r 8 ❑ I — -1 0 z I ;LJmuu r 1 f Vt. - -11r ''1r - 0 WI I F--- _ -i t ' — o I ❑ -1-- — — ® i o — — © I [t r ❑ I ! It — -1- _ o o- - ° I - - o- f I — i — o ilk 1 � i4 i i — 04 9 -[ `_ I I - 0 t I 4_ -i- — 0 IIC i o-- ❑ -F — — © — — -I-- 4 — ❑ I 17 — 0 — — a o ® I 1 ®- - -, 14 -l— — o r t — I � F ' — 0 0 �.�Illll� l� lll� l 3 ob 1 b b b 1 1 ' 6. MOLT ` enetworks �! "� 2`. �" , a , 03T'. ,,,,,$Ei a�F 111.1� a 3600 LIND AVE. RENTON, WASHINCTONw 720 wDI EINCT F,, T/10 C/QEMY 084E 9uIE t1 ° Q Q 4 4 4 ° 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 p ® v r v . Ir sP v r �-�-� I I I I I 3.r o- r r P Y I I I I Pr P I P I I I I I I I I I I I I - • . /1 i\O"4"1"4M16 lo 1ItrJ I I I I °,,, ,.._ i I I o o * �� ( I I I P GYILDI ifUiPRER E813 OF. LABE7ME (� -i=�- I FEZ a'O2 OF. SEALED CONCRETE BOOR P,T$¢4 OF. T€l l-IEAl19 6PACE ° �_ 1— —1 � —1. — , — I — f • CT4o,MT T T�RMAX.44 DEGI4!F — — - XAM�IO�.AN1E I I I I I I • I I �«�"�.° TRANI DIE, PAX KB RC - _ - -� - ,- -i - tll DLCQCEEi1m — I i 12 r I . 1iIIII �r 1 ©II.IIIII r i.G PIPE 90LLARD(11P PER DOOR) I __ I ,-^'4'^""84l IEEUEER(�•PRO I I • I $R ,e 4 •__ . r1 V POTB2TLAL OTKd --'-, Po1T91T14 aRRr1 N. K t"SAID OVER 6 MIL VAPOR OMRRIER r �.A, Y I% • Y )i r' f Y 7'EATD OVER 6 MIL VAPOR 9ARRER 4 r ��N#- N : i CNER 6"FREE DRAINING GRAVEL OVER 6'FREE CPAINING GRAVEL �! �� POTEN'IA OFFIa - ae Fg�:yam / 2 YEN'C4_At 2'YWCA.R-0 ,� 18 ^Vla iiiiiiiiiiii i FER7'E1ER*ALAI ON 1 PERPETER IN3.LATO �. 1` Gi 2 VER'IGdL R-m O i. P PERPETER NSULATI I 11._ II 1 oIII: 411 IIL F • „. _Ii.7.,..___ 1111 GIEBRATCRE l�II I ' �I \_-61!tetAtall• I� JI I I I y6 I 13-_cl yr ` WY .f.WY ; IV, I y f rr y r Pam. y FW f r+ y I •! rE--. ; Er r. f + 1I © Enz O O 1 i © 1 O I 0 0 RIF ,tE IKCRIATIOW 4 70.XX Or 4.710171 DOOR LAIR mow Mkt PE PRE EXTIGIII ELRDP 4.A 60 EC RATED. V W:NENOJSF YdCE IS SE""-lEA1ED(SEC D0]1(IiPILE6 y .4 M (CLEAR031)0 rn 4VLDIIFDAW aDeER feLIE412 M'aNr®1. HULL MOM kJ eX6+(TOP 4T 8'MF) JDER 89!lRAi!MIDI/DLL idK 610,EAT WI'N PARTIAL NORTH FLOOR PLAN �S W MINIM LOO(VP 1NENpD.WEATERETRP COAD•7:CT EENEE4 3 AND NC GREATER TAWS 01 I. 4 EUIr W'•I'-0' \ W 70TT01 WIMP,OR-Er WE Pill MD MK ®NRRIIILT ILLPEUTI D(2 cam W T6P'OBTAT MIRED NC LaER'wAt 1IE.NT dTD �_ e. C O Qi OBI•TNO DOOR 10 WAN LKOOCE)DIE1N' 4l1EfiW OK.10P MD EGRESS Llfsl3MG CAPABLE Q MEVEM�Wa�FATNG dEO+E N DEG.F. Y< * MIME POW,42 441ED 40 240 (2.44) PERECRIPTIYE APPROAGI,NE ENVELOPE REOAREI99.-9 ARE H O Ed'X DOT PECIEPAL OVERHEAD Dom © DOOR NAIL f SEE 0.1EDAE, RCS:Rl U.OJO(NR1 R.II) EMCICE00IT &116 DRAFT NRt4NE AND .• sotto, PAM SL *male DOOR WIBRIIIIBB PRGRIX#D STR.CE E 445 12G0 4R 121RL4TIOw ABM 44 C O 0 O RCM DECK O PR X 1'O•HOLM METAL DOOR PiNCLL=METAL PERT cR IWJd'I03IB DM FRONDED41 AIL IMPS Me,a,APR DOOIR.are,NODE MD 1 ✓( OiPCE AIEPS 40 d Y BANNER WILLIXi9D*CDR0 W NOW MDE8.LOOCEET,TI EMDLD(FAX VP/..DPP CAP,LATCw O,GW WCAIIEREIR TpT•AAD f 6M:L). P CO r24 C. C0'pN1TICN 0'0Y X UYT EECT1004.0VEI6EdD JOINING DLL OE RRIRRD AMR A MAT I PR48EM DOOR(VERR'AL LPT).SLOE LATO4 EOPHiE PACKAGE.Y X V IC IISTB6E R 440441 E IS OE 67/E DOOR ODTTA1 fPWt INITAXY SC X 1'0• °ERSOE rW ROOT. DOERQ!LGN(EG=GETr BASED o. NCLLOY FETAL DODR(LICE DOMCA all 6' n WSTtS PER LEEAR FOOT ME CP 6IEDK6 P 4116(tMD STEEL ERE EeERATER(PANTED) ARG14.JOT MD MDOOE OCAS AT Om wm P9R A— EOAIE FOOTAGE 2 A1.0106.LIC A)C.: 5E92 D X OM.41,317 W4TTE ALLOYED EXTERGR LIGNING: 2)61 LF X VW.001 EATTE C2P SF X OOW.2022 Wdm TOTAL EXIERCR•10629 WAm 4 08/18/00 10.20 ao P\CAD\0027NETVORK\A-2.IVG I , 4) (1) ";) T / / / / lo ? / T I I I I . AAlr �- I I id, r--,- I I I I I I I I I b i • o' ' I - I 1 [ r .r o LLIMEME SEALED "`� BEM.FAT t.AcA MAXOD /Wr RER'104TAT Er TO MAX 49 DEGIEE6 f. ROCA NR(ATILN A.I 1-1 Tom' — — — t — — t— r t— I fi — o I i I I I 1I I -- % 1 ii f I t — — t — � — t— A.PIPE = —t - -t— - _, o s Z 9ANR.R1 eEIER • '�O,r• i a0 I� � � �. — co n n, DO. I — � i 1 A..0 0 0 0 �g 0 s f'y�py7AL ORfi PQ1 lA GfiCE a /-!�!____,w!!____/ I 1•SAND OVER 6 MIL VAPOR DARNER r�^�� � ����`�, 7'SAND Or£R 6 MIL VAPOR DARNER � m OVER 6•FREE pRdNMG GRavELPMPT, O.£R b PEE DRdwG CIrdVEL % h _ �•� b 1aW< iiia 1'VERT'CAL R-10 7'VER'ICA.R-ID 4 DN nn1rG N PE PLATER NSLLAMON % PER!'ETER NdLA•IC% %riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii% —` j 1 Y I I rruL 4 vP '• 1 r r .rrr irirrrrrrrrritiiirii. orrrrrrriirriiiiriiirur.% r en e,oe r 0 r r____ 1 r\ __�L s___e�z r L G i'L r 5 4 Ut 11(1� i 11 \ •. r �__I — — . p a -.� .i. o �1 -I I LL. kc. J. 1 , ) yp� DAM N I c rR IV* �, 11. I CO114,16 LOU,. NY.R nc MIT Ap I.'1AT9.NM,' ECII WDER TI a. Tvr a. Rom' °' '.A °BARRIER FREE RESTROOM PEmirt lit » w M / • r Scut 1/.•.r o aL.N RAh�aLro v ri3fl �,7,1 OM Mn RYLdtp1 0 0 ® 0 b.r C.) OVERALL FLOOR PLAN W A 9r%bb•000DM DOOIRWTN ALW110MW C'..b,IMQ4.'5ER Tm 4-A be CC RAM, O !CLEAR ANLC 42'Y CLOSM(SAME MO RM .4L'1OI.TED W E A(TOP AT 9'AT) ^ GTLbDER LOOC N'nblbOLD,IEAD61/iRP "p'A' 3 �I a EOTTOI KEEP.OPdET WM PILL MO PIP. ®WIERULL*LLLIMMETED(1 emu W /�� rs SASN'TWb DOOR TO BATTEN Jl0 ED DM* DATtIRi DAOOlP.6'O 66111616 LKNTNG �jl. PANoelTED bOn ¢ W D.EIE551IW11B'.NRIdTED GLAZNG fLL•0U O 000R MARL!SEE 9D'ECLL) Ner6 TO.DAP DT WA O D IV%le'OM 4ECTICNAL OVEIREAD DOOR frER1ICAL LIP11%SLIDE LATCA NEMOE DCOR ® FILM OW, 0 EOTTOM f PAW EMWCR.T11 GAPANTED1 IIRL meals,McOE1.�". o 9r%1'O'N0.LC4IIWfAL DOOR 96 NOLLCW tET4 O1r'I JAIL(PANT DOOR T Jell NMI AND OTT).N W NRP.WW1,LOCr1E1,T15EbNOLD MAX In'i g b9D Pw2N9 Wu M G� DRIP CAP,LATa G'L11®,SEATIERTRP MN b•)W 4rt NLLARAI D COENATLT Ee1u X I/'tT 5EC11Qr.ULO9EREAD ei.ID NIY WE DOCR(ART C4'.PTI•SLDE I.ATCN 1EC4R4E (Mlb'J I1OER TI aDOEk000RnEa°1°tlODooRaITM6 ©TYPICAL RESTROOM SECTION STEEL EeE e669641 R 1PANIEO8Ti SECTION A-3 GAPAMJ SCALE.Vz•-r-o• 08/16/00 10.07 orn A-3./3W6. 0 o q o e q o ® II } u, } Fr r i Ar i v Fr �r Legft 1 1 '1 I I I 1 i I— 1, 1 F KD OPO SECOND FLOC% SSTSI OF sY•fw, 1 1111 0 __ , ITIE!•ICETAT SET TO MAX.Al DEGIEEBF. I © `— r I f FISIILATION ElI I. , \ — — —I 1 Q T r - - �� o I Ill EXTERIOR I'EGMA NIC&PLATVOr E%IERIOR MCAANICK T;:_ • - - -- r r 7 r 7 77 - LEY �1������ t __ LJ LJ LJ LJ RR a i 4 e 3 I iI— . ... ... pia II fRR gr © ` . a ... - ... r, .1 A. ... I °„R );- Im. , le -. .� CANOPY OEM 3• 0v♦• %s • 11 PARTIAL SECOND FLOOR PLAN I \'I'. £ .: r•� •.„E�� 6, NOTE:SEE SWEET A3 CI FOR DRAFT IIEfdNS AND xn.E iJ SMOI�vENTlSK1tKslR a l — Y 7 ° Q 0 oA w M1a � alb' d.b J. 4d Mi. ' _ .. A{y' 11, oe „IP �a (nr+ oA O I IP o MO — — I �5I�� I 1ROiM.,•i I I —I — ra o � I sr, 0 ha - I � I F { m rZ..© � a7 �� M-y M4r� � Ma � 0 HryY p M1a "n MFa p O O pW\__ mFArvRR. co c4 o b b b b b b b b i b WWIA. .A FM�a.AR.F�FmR i ROOF DRAINAGE PLAN A-4 rYT wr IMMY 44 Arl.l.,rr m.0 T aYAAIAIIpTY YAW MAW.ua TO Tr CI 1,444 MN ecua r.m• & 08/18/00 10:21 om C\CAD\002714E1'40RK0\A-4.DV 1 0 ® 0 0 r , w , v v . 1 w FlEEIt I L_ _t \ 11111 I t I.14CROORRIDOR ,f I — o fiECLTD ROOK TWERQSTAT SET TO MAC 49 DEGREES F. ROM NRLATICN R3 } ' 0 Et - I 3 I o oFill Ex1ERIOR MECARSCAL PLATFORM EKRROR MEi GARi PLATFORM 17-1 77 177 1--1 r 77ii LJ LJ �J LJ LJ LJ s� I- s 6V. T in in 4I� r OS _ _ .�. © IF_ Ts T J. >r 1 T sue• 1 WI' 1, lowI •�• ' ; MC a , ,. R' t �� y1 71 0 © 0 C.) 0 IM • .° 6' PARTIAL SECOND FLOOR PLAN + ' >; cz A x pi a� nz ocsEi.t °a A—5 OS/16/00 10:09 am C\CAD\0027NETVORKS\A-S.DVG Y 9 • PANTED F_A 9 Q J// WV 'AWED-LTV CPL�TE Y V ,fit REVEAL lilt MA NM rt11311111j jI,jlIr I !i i� �- -- �� • ��� I I r I II 1 I i ' iiit ! LOJVE.D M. OnuCO SORB AND ALRIMPI I DMI i i WEST ELEVATION SOUTH HALF ACCENT IMAID WV W I g MERE GLANS PANIEC�ASHTO LAMAS MOVE W MEWED RANTED I L-.L.CCHCRE'E LAMAS OEM O 0 Lf REVEAL 0 /l 0 0 O PETAL CANCPES ERNNNNLLLIII .E-• F[}AL 1E SAGO � I f1 Ij I I hl f Iq i�10 11 !'f� I I I T'!Mh. I ' 1 1 •- _-il 11 �__I = - - ---i— — — �— i I -' -I i i i o STUCCO WIPP MD ALW NM PHDOW - — - t1NEL EMOII2 AGCER AND WARE(CLEAVE LONERS TNT. NIR'TlSE GLARE TILT.IP COtC1ETE. .Nu.ATE, PAWED RATPPG WEST ELEVATION NORTH HALF PANTED FLASNRG LANSCAPE E841 PAWED%T•.' PANTED TILT-LP C C TE cat.[TE e Q ,� O REVEAL O O O O O O O Q i VEAL ( ��--� Q r _i ! !; I � e �1.���MMi IIII . " t it i�� a D 1 -� I. _ I x a ALIMNM ID,Da, 9W.00 SCiPI A1D a STUCCO 90IPIr AK, ACCENT ex0 ALIMNM.DCTU I I NUPE(CLEAR)A' ACCENT BAND MA`!(CLEYD UY • •0 1 f�f` TRR NZE GLASS P.LT-LIPCCNOE1E I ORME GLANS NSLLATED TETV CQCFETE Y LANSCAPE EER9 NEILAT#D NORTH ELEVATION LANSCARE T SOUTH ELEVATION COLOR PFORTIANCN SCALE:w••1-0• (:), PANTED WALE:w••I-D• wALLe rKELV,CC.E) VN39 PANTED TILT-UP CONCRETE DIAPOC EASEVCE Q W © 0 Q 0 LA MEAL— ,Li ® ALCM-EANO(KE_L'-"L^CIEI AT4• .+. .AC32-N ♦4 ROKpJR' 1t6� R. II M4.i r-I - I I 1 I Enz I j g RIME A TVIIIE MMilc ' Z EAST ELEVATION NORTH HALF re I AN DOOR Door. SCALE:in,.1.-0. RANTED FLn4•RG d x PANTED TILT.UP Dew-6 TE q) 0 0 0 0 0 r 0 Q 0 0 0 _ / TE EY� 4II • : — - - a �;.i 0 w — - i I _ - V�7�x I � 1 I II 11 1 FUTURE CkflevEAD.V WEE OVERHEAD u lE OVERHEAD i MAN DOOR I TIAN DOOR I MAN DOOR EAST ELEVATION SOUTH HALF A-6 SCALE:w'.i'-O' 00/16/00 09:11 am A-G.ING. CITY IF RENTON ..IL � Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator June 16, 2000 Ledcor Properties Inc. 9655 SE 36th St., Suite 210 Mercer Island, WA 98040 SUBJECT: LIND AVE. & SW 30TH ST. —PACIFIC GULF BUILDING Dear Barry: I have reviewed your request and agree that the proposed telecommunications facility is similar in intensity to a warehouse with respect to parking demand. The Renton Parking Code does not address telecommunication uses, however based on the reported nature of telecommunication operations the demand for parking seems to closely match that of warehouse and storage buildings. Although telecommunication facilities are not identified in Renton's Parking Code, I recognize that such uses are unique with respect to parking needs. Telecommunication facilities seem to require a considerable amount of floor area to house the technical equipment, however only a minimal number of employees are needed to operate the facility. Based on the information provided to the City on the operation of the proposed telecommunications facility, it seems appropriate to apply the warehouse and storage building parking requirements of one parking space for every 1,500 square feet of gross floor area. Please be advised that future users of the building will be subject to a parking analysis prior to the issuance of a business license or the approval of a building permit. If based on the parking analysis it is determined that the parking does not meet the requirements of the code or if the parking is inadequate to serve any future user, then any permits or licenses will be denied. Document2\cor 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, Washington 98055 ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer If you have any questions regarding this information please call me at (425) 430-7218. We look forward having your business in the City of Renton. Sincerely, Jana Hanson Development Services Director cc: Laureen Nicolay Lesley Nishihira Document2\cor 0Ei15i00 11:03 LEDCOR SEATTLE -* 425 4:50 'r.siU Nu. 1 We:• /``j OR LEDCOR PROPERTIES INC. 41,3o i " 9655 S,E.36d+St.SviL.210 tROPfR,11. Mercer Island.WA USA 98040 Teephonc:(206) 230.881 heslmiir.(206) 230.8833 June 15, 2000 City of Renton Development Services Department 1055 — Grady Way South Renton, WA 98055 Attention: Ms.Jana Hanson Dear Ms. Hanson: RE: Lind Avenue & SW 30' Street, Renton Pursuant to our last conversation, I have contacted Mr. Craig Burnell to discuss our proposed changes to the referenced property (increased panel height, structural upgrades, second floor addition, external backup generators). Mr. Burnell did not feel that any of the proposed changes were unreasonable, subject to a formal review of submitted drawings. With respect to parking, you had asked chat I provide you with a written description of our proposed use for the building. Attached is a description of the proposed facility and its parking requirements. In short, assuming we built out the entire second floor of the Lind Avenue building and created a total square footage of approximately 200,000 S.F., we anticipate our parking requirement to be in the order of 60 to 80 stalls. The facility is essentially a warehouse for racks of connected telecommunications equipment_ Technical personnel will be on- site 24 hours a day, seven days a week, in order to monitor the equipment and sales staff will periodically be on-site to explain and showcase the facility to potential clients (ie. companies who want to locate their servers in a specialized equipment environment and utilize the fiber optic network which will be fed from this facility). While our required parking ratio is in the range of I stall per 2,000 to 2,500 square feet, I understand that the City of Renton currently has no use category which would accommodate this low telecommunications parking need. If this understanding is correct, we are willing to accept a higher parking requirement of I stall per 1,500 square feet in order to move this project ahead quickly. f,AG, • ot.Nvu<. • EOMC NT;N . IU N1 '.1 A. I Lk • 1;,11t,N IQ • VAN1.17%.V,.. . 'NA•.IIIfJC.TiJ11. 06i15/00 11:03 LEDCOR SEATTLE 4 425 430 7300 City of Renton Lind Ave & SW 39° Street ,von June 15, 2000 _v iroiwt#,u Page 2 of 2 .o❑ndnA In/90 In order for 360networks to commit to this Renton facility, I need assurances from the City of Renton that we would be in compliance with parking bylaws if we were to create the planned 200,000 S.F. of telecommunications space. Jana, please feel free to contact me to discuss these matters in further detail at your earliest convenience. Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely LEDCOR PROPERTIES INC. Barry Gilbert Vice President • c Al.wk RY • DENVER • EC ,ONTON • oyrnr: ,;il • MhNL+ • SC•TTIE • TOKONTO • VANCOI)VfR • WAS$INCiION. D.0 06/15/00 11:03 LEDCOR SFATTLE 4 425 433 7300 NO. 179 D04 Proposed Telecommunications Facility Lind Avenue & SW 39`h Street, Renton, Washington (200,000 S.F.) Building Use: Internet and Fiberoptics companies, like their predecessors the Telephone Companies, require 'switching buildings' within which to make connections from their systems to their customers. While the technology is different,the analogy holds because the building shell is filled with racks of 'switching' equipment called 'servers' and the laser &fiber electronics needed to run them. The basic philosophy of design is that these buildings will operate 24 hours per day, 7 days per week at an expected online expectancy of the order of 99.99%. In order to accommodate the nature of this operation and the necessary support infrastructure, these ordinary looking buildings are designed, through state-of-the-art mechanical, electrical, fire suppression and security systems, to provide the ideal environmental to house telecommunications equipment Parking Requirements There is a staffing component attached to the housing and technical monitoring of the telecommunications equipment. Typically, there is a 'command central station' monitoring and visually overlooking the hundreds of aligned racks. For a 200,000 S.F. facility, at any time there could potentially be 20 to 30 technical support staff servicing the equipment on the floor. Sales presence is fairly low key and occurs during normal business hours—maybe five (5) or six (6) people and a few customers wanting to view the facility. Combined with a business administration function of six (6) to twelve (12) people we expect a maximum of 60 to 80 people in the building at any given time. As an industry norm, 360networks assumes a maximum of one person per 1,000 square feet; It Is generally much lower. While very few municipalities have a use category which correctly defines this type of facility, there is a growing recognition of a ratio in the order of I stall per 2.000 to 2,500 square feet. For example, in Toronto we are constructing 130 stalls for a 285,000 S.F. facility and in Boston, a parking ratio of I stall per 2,500 S.F. has been accepted. II Me.-,<o.,a eM«.a.n cue..nn'..cur.a a.Ow.u.Q..uon.bm. 06/15/00 11:03 LEDCOR SEATTLE -> 425 430 7300 NU. 1r'7 L, • ,•4U LU !r1 1 21 ?M , SOY.ERV TRAFFIC PARK FAX lO. 617 F?, 75 ' yy OM 01�7),•, CITY OF SOMERVILLE, MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF TRAFFIC AND PARKING DOROTHY A. KELLY GAY MAYOR WILLIAM F. LYONS JR., P.E. JAMES A.O'CONNELL,JR. UIRfCTUt< Al)MINIti'Ik,l('IVI ASSIcrANr • May 26,2000 Mr. Barry Gilbert, Vice President Ledcor Properties, Inc. 100, 1066 West Hastings Street Vancouver, British Columbia Canada V6F, 3X1 �`// - SUBJECT: 70 & 100 Inner Belt Road Letter Dated May 17, 2000 Dear Mr. Gilbert: At your request, we have reviewed the parking analysis as set forth in the above subject correspondence,—We are in agreement with the analysis as submitted. In particular,we concu(that the I parking space per 2,500 square feet of telecommunications use is appropriate. In addition, w believe that the amount of parking spaces which would result from your proposed parking lot redesign and the ubsequent addition to the facility would be adequate given the blend of uses specified in the letter. Please note that we have also considered the size of the HomeRuns fleet in our deliberations. As you know, the Somerville Zoning Ordinance (SZO) specifies that the warehouse use requires on-site parking in the amount of 1 space per 1,500 square feet, plus the amount of vehicles in the tenant's fleet Our present understanding is that the iTomeRttns fleet currently includes 70 vehicles and that they hope to expand their fleet to 100 vehicles in the near future. \Ve also understand that the current permit authorizes up to 130 vehicles to be stored inside. Assuming these statements are true, we believe that the current indoor parking capacity is well above the current fleet size. Therefore, there is no impact to the parking requirements due to the fleet size. It is also important to note that a final determination regarding the adequacy of the proposed parking will be made in conjunction with the Superintendent of Inspectional Services when you submit an application for a building permit for your proposed addition. At that time, this office will confirm that no substantive changes have been made in your proposal. If we confrm that your proposal is essentially the same,we will confer with the Superintendent of Inspectional Services to approve your parking requirements. �• 133 Hpi ryNi+Gtcc!% • 50e1Ktvn L/.M v.Cnfi7L15RT'TS 0 1 E (617)6154600 •TTY:(617)666-0001 • rAx:(617)62a.6675 rY o 20ea 10:30 61'1 628 6675 PaGE.02 06/15/00 11:03 LEDCOR SEATTLE 4 425 430 7300 NU. 17y Wbb FRI 1 :22 N SO:ERA TRAFFIC PARK FAX «0. 617 E2 75 P. 3 Bany Gilbert May 26,2000 Page 2 Thank you for your patience in our efforts to conduct this review. We look forward to reviewing your formal submission of a proposal. If we can be of any further assistance on this or any other matter, please do not hesitate to contact me directly. Sincerely, • William F. Lyons Jr., P.E. Director c: Stephen Post, Executive Director, Office of Housing & Community Development J. Brandon Wilson, Executive Director, Planning Board Pat Scrima, Superintendent, Inspectional Services Division/DPW David Dupree, Cathartes Investments, Inc. C\My FiJes1WPDOCS\Comment Memos170-100 Inner Belt.wpd ,,,OY — 7aac+ 1 q;1P 617 628 6675 PAGE.03 rr .ry r; R. © CITY OF RENTON SEP U 12000 D CITY CLERK'S OFFICE 'ZCEIV E MEMORANDUM DATE: August 31,2000 TO: Lesley Nishihira,Development Services FROM: Bonnie Walton, x6513, SUBJECT: Declaration of Covenant -recording# 20000815001058 Pacific Gulf Development; LLA-99-105 The attached document has been recorded with King County, and is being returned to you. Please forward copies to parties of interest, and retain a copy for your file. The original document has been retained by the City Clerk. Thank you. Enclosures: (1) cc: File LLA-99-105 After Recording return to: III 10 II WHEN RECORDED RETURN Tfl: 20000815001058 cx, Office of the City Clerk CITY OF RENTON COV 9.00 Renton City Hall PAGE 001 OF 00208/15/2000 11:43 1045 SuUtti Grady Way KING COUNTY, WA Renton, WA 98055 co �.n DECLARATION OF COVENANT IN CONSIDERATION of the approved City of Renton Building permit for application 0 No. 8990733 relating to real property described as follows: Lots 2 and 3 of City of Renton Short Plat LUA—97-159-SHPL as recorded under King County Auditor's File No. 9805219013, all situate in the Southwest quarter of Section 30, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., City of Renton, King County, Washington. The undersigned, Pacific Gulf Properties, Inc., as Grantor, declares that the above described property is hereby subject to a covenant for review of parking needs and hereby covenants to the City of Renton (Grantee) as follows: Tenant parking needs shall be analyzed prior to building permit issuance, including tenant improvements. If the ultimate user of the property exceeds the number of employees from what is expected for a typical warehouse/distribution use or is a fleet-based user with higher parking demands, then further environmental review and additional parking may be required prior to issuance of a building permit and/or business license. 1 DATED atki'/C 6/1.(.)-P/9// ..a., this 3/�fday of J , 2000. 2 6Srp►tA -Pc(44:Rc, erfi ec5NAI c. (Pacific Gulf Prop, rop s, Iric.) /*k. A. By: och\ , 7 By: STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) )ss. COUNTY OF Ord ) coOn this 3/ day of , 2000 before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in u-) and for the State of Ckliforrll'a.. ; duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared 2 art f/Nigel and 1 er-F 1 e_tdeJ to me, known to be the o \i C� Imo-r�,5id'�jf andi orVicQlrespectively, Pacific Gulf Properties, Inc., the t.-r' corporation that executed the covenant and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein set forth, and on co oath stated that they were authorized to sign said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. CV WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above written. Given under my hand and official seal this J/ day of 9,,dt, , 2000. < J� - - - - -- Notary's Signatt4te • — — - TORGERSOM Art f : Catriridon 012/5174 NOTARY P LIC in and for the `,! in,' miCarte c9,l! 13 esDec State of Call nAccu Residing at: yo21 Val ,S4-0_enS AVe `San4a- '1G1) !Von(),n()ia 9,2707 My Commission Expires: Ow. Qi 0?O03 • 2 •I _., CITY JF RENTON ..LL Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator August 7, 2000 Bart G. Treece Treece &Company 4030 Lake Washington Blvd NE#1200 Kirkland, WA 98033 SUBJECT: Pacific Gulf Development(File No. LUA-99-105, ECF, SA-H) Pacific Gulf Lot Line Adjustment(File No. LUA-00-079, LLA) Dear Mr. Treece: The City of Renton has approved the above referenced lot line adjustment and has forwarded the final mylars to King County for recording. In addition, the Parking Covenant also required as a condition of approval for the development of the site has been forwarded to the County for recording. Please note the recording of the lot line adjustment map alone does not transfer ownership of property. If necessary, prepare and record a deed transferring ownership of the portion of land depicted in the lot line adjustment map. We recommend that the legal description for this document be prepared by a surveyor. It is the applicant's responsibility to ensure this document is properly prepared and recorded with the County. If you have any further questions regarding this lot line adjustment, please contact me at (425) 430-7270. Sincerely, Lesley Nishihi Associate Planner cc: Yellow file Pacific Gulf Properties, Owners H:\DIVISION.S\DEVELOPSER\DEVEP AN)NGPROJECTS\00-07o,Inkp NALa TR-dnc 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, Washington 98055 GI This oaoer contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer DOCUMENTS FOR RECORDING KING COUNTY RECORDS &ELECTIONS DIVISION TO: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE • DATE: 0/7 /V t) FROM: N t c7 t t R-A/0E-A . . /)C.�9--1 c7 (Name,division,and extension) BILLING ACCOUNT NUMBER: /001.JCL D•t90(O 0- .fOv©O It (xxx/xx oocx.xxx.)xxx.xxxx.xx.xxxxxx): IS REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX FORM REQUIRED? No El Yes ❑ (Attach form) (Account will be charged$2.00 filing fee) INDEXING NOTES: PA-(A F I Ci ( i(F Dr/1`T'/l 'O P NAJF• T ' ( -- f' C I /Agc(-1Dc, �F, SPA- H SPECIAL RECORDING INSTRUCTIONS: NPA- DATE ACQUIRED: GRANTOR: /�, PURPOSE: IZ P, J t V WA/11mi o'C p q/1/�t �j � it-t/Ct��Y\ I E E, COMMON DESCRIPPTII / R G G47iV G✓AC.1 ADDRESS: "--3 ZOO d e'v l/( i\.1 D P.I.D. to-963-100 -00 kJ?5 S-T-R: a ' J E CROSS STREETS: Svv sfi -} clvv CURRENT USE: �V �-cn�- , 4 MANAGING DEPARTMENT: DEPT. FILE#. RECORDING# Rev Date 7/97 TS/REC DOC.DOT/bh a 4 CITY C _ RENTON Office of the City Attorney Jesse Tanner,Mayor Lawrence J.Warren MEMORANDUM DEVFL OPMENT PLANNING OF RFNTON JUL 1 7 2000 To: Lesley Nishihira, Development/Planning RECEIVED From: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date: July 13, 2000 Subject: Parking Restrictive Covenant Pacific Gulf Properties 3 600 & 3 800 Lind Avenue SW The covenant is approved as to legal form. The last two sentences are unnecessary and should be eliminated if that can be done without undue effort. Who reviews the covenant and when it should be filed have nothing to do with the covenant itself. Lawrence J. Warren LJW:tmj cc: Jay Covington T10.24:24 Post Office Box 626 - 100 S. 2nd Street - Renton, Washington 98057 - (425)255-8678 •! This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer CITY OF RENTON PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: July 13,2000 TO: Lesley Nishihira FROM: Sonja J.Fesser SUBJECT: Pacific Gulf Properties,Parking Restrictive Covenant Format and Legal Description Review Bob Mac Onie and I have reviewed the above referenced covenant document and ask that the appropriate section,township and range in the following format,"All situate in the Southwest quarter of Section 30,Township 23 North,Range 5 East,W.M.,City of Renton,King County, Washington,"be added to the end of the legal description contained therein. \H:\FILE.SYS LND\30\0210\RV000712.doc CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works MEMORANDUM DATE: July 11, 2000 TO: Larry Warren, City Attorney FROM: Lesley Nishihira, Development/Planning SUBJECT: Parking Restrictive Covenant Pacific Gulf Properties 3600 & 3800 Lind Avenue SW As a SEPA mitigation measure for the land use application for the Pacific Gulf warehouse/office building (LUA-99-105, SA-H, ECF), the applicant was required to establish a restrictive covenant in order to address current and future parking concerns. A copy of the applicant's draft covenant is attached. Please review the document for the appropriate language and format. A copy of the document has also been forwarded to Property Services for review of the legal descriptions. If you have any questions, please contact me at 430- 7270. Thank you. CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works MEMORANDUM DATE: July 11, 2000 TO: Sonja Fesser, Property Services FROM: Lesley Nishihira, Development/Planning J SUBJECT: Parking Restrictive Covenant Pacific Gulf Properties 3600 & 3800 Lind Avenue SW As a SEPA mitigation measure for the land use application for the Pacific Gulf warehouse/office building (LUA-99-105, SA-H, ECF), the applicant was required to establish a restrictive covenant in order to address current and future parking concerns. A copy of the applicant's draft covenant is attached. Please review the document for the appropriate legal descriptions. A copy of the document has also been forwarded to the City Attorney for review of the format and language. If you have any questions, please contact me at 430-7270. 07/1172000 11:22 425-822-7216 PETERSON CONSULTING NAU±• el OFL CAM '*44.14/ :gyp 7671 post. ir Fax Npte • .' After Recording return to: c°j0e0� DECLARATION OF COVENANT IN CONSIDERATION of the approved City of Renton Building permit for application No. 8990733 relating to real property described as follows: Lots 2 and 3 of City of Renton Short Plat LUA—97-159-SHPL as recorded under King County Auditor's File No. 9805219013. The undersigned, Pacific Gulf Properties, Inc., as Grantor, declares that the above described property is hereby subject to a covenant for review of parking needs and hereby covenants to the City of Renton (Grantee) as follows: Tenant parking needs shall be analyzed prior to building permit issuance, including tenant improvements. If the ultimate user of the property exceeds the number of employees from what is expected for a typical warehouse/distribution use or is a fleet-based user with higher parking demands, then further environmental review and additional parking may be required prior to issuance of a building permit and/or business license. This restrictive covenant shall be submitted to the Development Services Division and approved by the City Attorney prior to recording. This restrictive covenant shall be recorded prior to issuance of building permits. 07/11/2000 11:22 425-822-7216 f-EJ LK5UN UUNSULIlNU rHUL nL DATED at , this day of , 2000. (Pacific Gulf Properties, Inc.) By: By: STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss. COUNTY OF ) On this day of , 2000 before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of ;duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared and to me, known to be the and respectively, of Pacific Gulf Properties, Inc., the corporation that executed the covenant and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein set forth, and on oath stated that they were authorized to sign said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above written. Given under my hand and official seal this day of , 199_. Notary's Signature NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Residing at: My Commission Expires: 2 Attdi LEDcOR Pf1OPEN1IES INC. Y AK 9655 S.E 36t1)S. Sure 110 Mercer island,WA 7 t•� n7'r cnr,e USA 9Sp10 Teleohole:(2061 230-86II June 29, 2000 City of Renton Development Services Department 1055 Grady Way South Renton, WA 98055 ATTENTION: MS. ANA HANSON Dear Jana. RE: PACIFIC GULF RENTON CENTER LIND AVENUE & SW 39" STREET Thank you for your letter dated June 16, 2000 in which s ace lof confirm thatry I theSOO parking ratio to be used for our telecommunications use will be onep building area. This was very helpful in progressing our interest in the Renton site. We are proceeding with our drawings of the design changesd w Iich h,000 I cussSFe med e with Craig Burnell and yourself (increased clear heights to 30 feet, g floor area, increased structural elements, exterior gensets etc.) of and hope to be able to formally submit building permit revisions in the couple My understanding from an earlier conversation with Examine har. t Further,ht was expected these canges will not trigger a SEPA review nor a review by the Hearing that the permit reviewlapproval process would take in the order of two to four weeks assuming our permit drawings are complete and accurate. If my understanding is not correct, please contact me at your earliest convenience. Thank you. Sincerely, LEDCOR INDUSTRIES INC. Barry Gilbert Vice President . UFNVFM • YI”•I,INT'AN • ::•lr r,ri i ITV . IILNi.f • ',Lnl ,Lk • • v13LUU�te. • I,vAr.niNt:Yri N. f1 i. �► CIT OF RENTON ti• ;; Hearing Examiner Jesse Tanner,Mayor Fred J.Kaufman February 24, 2000 Mr. Barton Treece 4030 Lk Washington Blvd N,#200 Kirkland, WA 98033 Re: PACIFIC GULF PROPERTIES FILE No. LUA99-105,SA-H Dear Mr. Treece: The Examiner's Report and Decision on the above referenced matter, which was issued on January 25, 2000, was not appealed within the 14-day period established by ordinance. Therefore, this matter is considered final by this office and the file on your application is being transmitted to the City Clerk as of this date. Please feel free to contact this office if further assistance or information is required. Sincerely, Fred J. KaufmaIl Hearing Examiner FJK/mm cc: Peter Rosen Sandi Seeger, Development Services 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 - (425)430-6515 Ala_ IMO CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING Zoo* On the 4ti" day of L�.Inu�O.v , 4999 I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing R ?ovt H .6 . documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing ov\--Trrrr. . Jr. ('owc11 - O‘nllul (Signature of Sender) Sav4vz K K . SCE-ry--' STATE OF WASHINGTON SS COUNTY OF KING I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that 1naifA lc_ S.2��p� signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: law, . / . `LD o 6 ahr Notary Publy�in and for the State 1' Washington Notary (Print) My appointmeif (Ii MCHEH- MY APPOIN I MEN I tXPIRES.E3-29-03 Project Name: • Packfic -f Pvo e i t,cg Project Number: MARILYN KAMCHEFF UiPt • 9q . ioS, Sw—h,ELe NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF WASHINGTON COMMISSION EXPIRES JUNE 2 2003 ' NOTARY.DOC AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. County of King ) MARILYN MOSES ,being first duly sworn,upon oath, deposes and states: That on the 25th day of January ,2000, affiant deposited in the mail of the United States a sealed envelope(s) containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. Signature: C 2� c77/AR29 SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this I-1 t day of JaA1ttQ' ,1/, 2000. Notary Publiciip and for the State of Washington, residing at (At, Y1, ,therein. Application, Petition, or Case No.: Pacific Gulf Properties LUA99-105,SA-H The Decision or Recommendation contains a complete list of the Parties of Record. HEARING EXAMINER'S REPORT January 25, 2000 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION APPLICANT: Barton Treece Pacific Gulf Properties File No.: LUA-99-105,SA-H LOCATION: 3600 and 3800 Lind Avenue SW SUMMARY OF REQUEST: To construct a 106,752 square foot industrial warehouse/ office building SUMMARY OF ACTION: Development Services Recommendation: Approve with conditions DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REPORT: The Development Services Report was received by the Examiner on January 5,2000 PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Development Services Report,examining available information on file with the application, field checking the property and surrounding area;the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The following minutes are a summary of the January 11,2000 hearing. The legal record is recorded on tape. The hearing opened on Tuesday,January 11,2000,at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of the Renton City Hall. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing the original Exhibit No. 2: Vicinity map application,proof of posting,proof of publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No.3: Site plan Exhibit No.4: Building elevations Exhibit No.5: Zoning Map The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by PETER ROSEN,Project Manager,Development Services,City of Renton, 1055 S Grady Way,Renton,Washington 98055. The applicant is proposing to construct an industrial warehouse/office building of approximately 106,752 square feet. The building footprint would be approximately 98,752 square feet with an additional 8,000 square foot mezzanine. The site is located in a Medium Industrial Zone(IM)with a mix of uses. Directly to the east is a Home Base/Act III Cinemas complex,north is U.S. Rentals and Farwest Steels,and south and west are industrial warehouse developments. The front of the proposed building is oriented to Lind Avenue SW. There are four recessed bays with dock-high loading doors which are recessed from the offices above. On the east side there will be at-grade loading. A Barton Treece Pacific Gulf Properties File No.: LUA-99-105,SA-H January 25,2000 Page 2 wetland area was created as a wetland mitigation for the Home Base complex,and it extends onto the subject site. The applicant is providing the required 25 foot buffer for the wetland. A detention pond will be located in the southeast corner of the site. Access to the site will be by way of three driveways,two of which are existing. The north driveway will be shared with Farwest Steels. The south driveway is the back entry drive to the Home Base complex. It is not a public street and is rarely used by the public. A third driveway will be created in the center of the site off Lind Avenue. The proposal includes 210 parking spaces. The Environmental Review Committee(ERC)issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated(DNS- M),with three mitigation measures imposed. The measures included payment of fire and transportation mitigation fees, as well as a restrictive covenant regarding the parking. The Comprehensive Plan(CP)designation for the site is Employment Area Valley, and the objective is to provide for a mix of uses in the valley rather than straight industrial. The proposal is consistent with the CP policies which encourage a mix of uses,quality development,and sharing of driveway access. Also proposed is 20 feet of frontage landscaping which is consistent with CP policies for this area. There are no specific tenants identified for the proposal at this time,but it is planned for a mix of 40 percent office, 30 percent warehouse and 30 percent manufacturing. The setback and landscape requirements of the IM zone are met with this proposal. The site is located in the Green River Valley planning area which requires two percent natural wildlife landscaping. The landscape plan did not indicate a specific area,but the east boundary of the site bordering the wetland buffer is a 25 foot wide landscape planted area which is planted with native vegetation. This exceeds the two percent requirement. Parking regulations require a minimum 5 percent landscaping for interior parking lots,and staff is recommending that the applicant provide further information to demonstrate that they are in compliance. In terms of parking,the 210 parking spaces are based on the anticipated mix of 40 percent office,and 60 percent warehouse/manufacturing. The ERC had concerns regarding occupancy of the building and its eventual parking needs. They imposed a mitigation measure requiring a restrictive covenant that tenant parking needs be analyzed prior to issuance of a building permit. The subject site is composed of two legal parcels and the proposed building is bisected by an existing lot line. Staff is recommending that the applicant either record a lot line adjustment to remove or adjust the lot line,or record a restrictive covenant to prohibit the sale of one of the parcels. Staff recommends approval of the proposed site plan,subject to the following conditions: (1)the applicant verify that the parking area includes a minimum of 5 percent interior parking lot landscaping in order to comply with the code standards;(2)the applicant record a lot line adjustment to remove or adjust the lot line that bisects the proposed building,or record a restrictive covenant to prohibit sale of one of the underlying parcels. Bart Treece,4030 Lake Washington Blvd NE,#200, Kirkland,Washington 98033, applicant representative herein,described the hydrology of the existing wetlands on the subject and adjacent sites,as well as the detention facilities. He further detailed the history of the lot line,and concluded that an adjustment would be made to accommodate staff recommendations. Mr. Treece explained that the project at this time is not speculative and Pacific Gulf intended to go forward with the building,even though there are no tenants signed up. Neil Watts,Plan Review Supervisor,Development Services Division,City of Renton, 1055 S Grady Way, Renton,Washington 98055,confirmed that there is no street parking in this area of Lind Avenue. Barton Treece Pacific Gulf Properties File No.: LUA-99-105,SA-H January 25,2000 Page 3 The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak,and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 9:45 a.m. FINDINGS,CONCLUSIONS&DECISION Having reviewed the record in this matter,the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant, Barton Treece,filed a request for approval of a Site Plan for a mixed use office/warehouse building. 2. The yellow file containing the staff report,the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA)documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit#1. 3. The Environmental Review Committee(ERC),the City's responsible official, issued a Declaration of Non-Significance-Mitigated(DNS-M)for the subject proposal. 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5. The subject site is located on the east side of Lind Avenue SW between SW 36th Street and SW 38th Street. The parcel is located immediately west of Home Base and Act III Theater and shares the block with them and some other uses. 6. The subject site was initially annexed to the city with the adoption of Ordinance 1745 enacted in April 1959,as amended by Ordinances 1764 and 1928 enacted in May 1959 and December 1961, respectively. 7. The subject site is zoned IM(Medium Industrial). 8. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of employment generating uses,but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the Plan. 9. The subject site is a generally rectangular parcel,although it narrows to a point at the southernmost end of the site. The site is approximately 360 feet wide(east to west)by approximately 1,000 feet long. It is 7.39 acres. 10. The site is generally level with a wetland located along the eastern property line. The wetland was developed as compensation for the development east of the subject site. The applicant will be maintaining a 25 foot buffer between the wetland and the active development area. The buffer will be left undisturbed. 11. The applicant proposes constructing a mixed use building with approximately 40%office uses,30% warehouse uses and 30%manufacturing uses. The IM zone permits offices if they are an adjunct of the principal warehousing or manufacturing uses. 12. The building will be approximately 106,752 square feet. The main footprint will be 98,752 square feet and there will be a 8,000 square foot mezzanine. The proposed building will be 30 feet tall. The Barton Treece Pacific Gulf Properties File No.: LUA-99-105,SA-H January 25,2000 Page 4 building will be approximately 750 feet long. The building will vary in depth due to the inclusion of four recessed loading bays and glass-fronted office areas at the front,Lind Avenue,facade. At the bays the building will be approximately 100 feet deep. The office areas will extend out approximately 46 feet from the bay areas. 13. The glass office area will set off the front portions of the building from the recessed delivery areas in front of the building. The recessed areas provide appropriate maneuvering space of 100 feet for the above-grade bays. 14. There are additional loading areas in the rear of the site. These areas are ground level and have the appropriate 45 feet of maneuvering space. 15. Code requires a minimum 20 foot setback from Lind and the applicant will be providing an 85 foot setback. No setbacks are required for rear or side yards but the applicant will be providing the 25 foot wetland buffer as well as leaving the wetland undisturbed. A detention pond will be located in the south "pointed"area providing a form of setback. There are small angular landscape islands along the north boundary of the subject site. 16. Code requires 20 feet of landscaping along the street. The applicant will be providing a double row of trees in this area which will be coupled with public right-of-way landscaping and sidewalks. A bioswale that flows to a storm water pond will be located in this front landscaping area. 17. The area lies within the Soil Conservation Service Green River Valley area that requires 2% landscaping for wildlife. Staff has noted that the plans don't demonstrate the areas but believes that with the wetland and wetland buffers,that the applicant meets the code provision. 18. The applicant will be providing a picnic table and bike rack near the northwest corner of the building in a landscape area. 19. The applicant will be providing 210 parking stalls generally distributed around the perimeter of the subject site with some additional parking in front of the office areas. The ERC decision regarding parking complement was based on the use mix noted above. If the uses change,the parking complement will have to be reviewed. 20. Three driveways provide access to Lind. The north driveway will be shared with the adjacent property to the north. The center driveway will serve the subject site while the southernmost driveway will serve the subject site while also serving the movie theater east of the subject site. The north and south driveways will provide access to the rear of the subject site. 21. The subject site consists of two separate legal parcels. Staff is concerned that they could be separately conveyed complicating ownership and land use issues such as parking. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The site plan ordinance provides a number of specific criteria for reviewing a site plan. Those criteria are generally represented in part by the following enumeration: a. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; Barton Treece Pacific Gulf Properties File No.: LUA-99-105,SA-H January 25,2000 Page 5 b. Conformance with the Building and Zoning Codes; c. Mitigation of impacts on surrounding properties and uses; d. Mitigation of the impacts of the proposal on the subject site itself; e. Conservation of property values; f. Provision for safe and efficient vehicle and pedestrian circulation; g. Provision of adequate light and air; h. Adequacy of public services to accommodate the proposed use; The proposed use satisfies these and other particulars of the ordinance. 2. The proposed use should create additional employment opportunities in this area of the Green River Valley,thereby fulfilling the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The building complies with the Zoning Code in meeting setback and height limits,as well as providing appropriate maneuvering room for the loading bays and general parking areas. Compliance with Building Codes will be determined with the submission of the building permit. 4. The building is relatively low-rise,at 30 feet high. It is set back substantially from Lind Avenue and provides a buffer of 25 feet for the on-site wetland. The use will generate additional traffic that will be noticed by other users but this impact was anticipated. 5. The articulated glass wall facade alternating with the inset loading bays will break up the bulk of the building from the street and while on the site. The wetland also reduces the overall bulk and provides a good separation between the subject site and the adjacent property. There will be picnic seating and bike racks for employees. 6. The development of the subject site should enhance property values and increase the tax base of the City. 7. The three driveways and the rectilinear parking and aisles provide safe and efficient circulation patterns. There will be pedestrian routes to the sidewalk. 8. The site is served by City services and development of the site will not tax the underlying infrastructure. DECISION: The Site Plan is approved subject to the following conditions: �l. The applicant shall verify that the parking area includes a minimum of 5%interior parking lot landscaping,and the site provides its 2%soil conservation landscaping in order to comply with the code standards. The landscape plan shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division, prior to issuance of building permits. Barton Treece Pacific Gulf Properties File No.: LUA-99-105,SA-H January 25,2000 Page 6 ,d, 2. The applicant shall either record a lot line adjustment to remove or adjust the lot line that bisects the proposed building,or record a restrictive covenant to prohibit the sale of one of the underlying parcels. The lot line adjustment shall be approved or the covenant shall be recorded prior to issuance of building permits. A covenant requires approval of the Development Services Division and City Attorney prior to recordation. J3. The applicant shall comply with the ERC conditions. ORDERED THIS 25th day of January 2000. FRED J.KA N HEARING EXAMINER TRANSMITTED THIS 25th day of January,2000 to the parties of record: Peter Rosen Bart Treece Neil Watts 1055 S Grady Way 4030 Lk. Washington Blvd N#200 1055 S Grady Way Renton,WA 98055 Kirkland,WA 98033 Renton,WA 98055 Lloyd Weatherford Powell-Orillia L.L.C. 4800 S 188th,#330 737 Market Street SeaTac,WA 98188 Kirkland,WA 98033 TRANSMITTED THIS 25th day of January,2000 to the following: Mayor Jesse Tanner Gregg Zimmerman,Plan/Bldg/PW Admin. Members,Renton Planning Commission Jana Hanson,Development Services Director Chuck Duffy,Fire Marshal Sue Carlson,Econ.Dev.Administrator Lawrence J. Warren,City Attorney Larry Meckling,Building Official Transportation Systems Division Jay Covington,Chief Administrative Officer Utilities System Division Councilperson Kathy Keolker-Wheeler South County Journal Betty Nokes,Economic Development Director Pursuant to Title IV,Chapter 8, Section 15 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m.,February 8,2000.. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure,errors of law or fact,error in judgment,or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen(14)days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant,and the Examiner may, after review of the record,take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV,Chapter 8, Section 16,which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of$75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department,first floor of City Hall. i Barton Treece Pacific Gulf Properties File No.: LUA-99-105,SA-H January 25,2000 Page 7 If the Examiner's Recommendation or Decision contains the requirement for Restrictive Covenants,the executed Covenants will be required prior to approval by City Council or final processing of the file. You may contact this office for information on formatting covenants. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte(private one-on-one)communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. f, • d . JI I :..moo _ 714am Y.,. WIMP r II '46 - Ltw-,Lor ire II6 Mir Diu .. . • 7.:.i:�� i ....., _fr�.lipeor r :Mir r I �-- ti 'NM 111[} J,J= II urn Si■ 11111 1 U V r1a t 011 SW111111 lEG4 D ESOI PT01 r�� rs od r•�v:. , l r. L Mom. S. _NM n I.. ! ona nuu.n o.cs1 a rv'G1p1 •Wirral roe r 1. t IR 01 tn•t I51SW .•.9.0 410 rmyreim .ne 9•Ti.WW1*I Ml 091 1 011 CI 010.40lr"'.; „1.1.KI,IRI rf•I I.,� r ir yu 1.41101. \' a T.0001.1 Mr. at ]::,..,11;,z,•r.11 .lrt.l Ilrl•r.II.1.1.1.11 1]NM1.111tM•1IT'•r1.14 Mt..I N0 I Il.r.f ✓11.11r111104n f 0100 I SI1R,IT]MO N II II.111a.1 T4■al• 919 9 Mr INl P.I✓. .tt•11Inn Ifit•.01F 1•1111Q..WIN r■1I1 F 000 Ill.1..T f r[.It11 `� V r0010 fnc 1ms 010 11.10 Sri•1nv Sr a w..Iml, ►ICININ MAP no•. 141.•4101r I1r1.r[.R441111141. T Y11.Y.PI41gr 1111.RI ICY M 1•p Ifs.. 0 �]� E )(/) C �:- -...✓ 1 i i 1 N ' .�..-.-'I R ell! ,1 f ��' L. I we"1vnos . M T I 1 1 1 L - X - j 4 ill -i J- Y •--- ..r a••s0 Yt_ ;�I_i�11r nrle__ __�__I __ - ____ •w. --LA�.� n1 1 w 'R' .rrrar., �I � r' 1 I 1 - 7 w� / • r.w�]nlw rrr•'•I`u ....._. _ __ _ m I yo I ' .- - ' bJR_J 4rs,..o w1 �_� _ - -- --- laj '�-1 � X1E3 1 +fir ___ ____- w 1 ae / I wo r I I I i I I I . I ' �% 111 I'{11111 , , 1r1.n 1 1 . lu. Y // 11 2'4 N .11 _ , \ '\' 17--s1c. ' — •� 1�1 J w i � fa1.n..s / I 1 • �I II 7 1 �. 1-±. s ,„L� r II 7, • 1 _ — • ; : :! L • • i'1 1 A.r �\ .1 �Ms saa aaa 1 nLaa sL�a I a6�a _ iy,,, I W ' -._� s e.0 i • .111 fI I i eo i i ..1 i i •1@ I Y�> rrarsrstt ii t��ccl Q-• c 11 I�' .__ I. .I�.rnL ! I I ! rr- t I ;M I IA.sY�•I r A� ii • i1 O i I •�+...... _. _[ 1 l 1 .�+ —�i d "`1'."'r �i ii l� �i H °- I '" AA (1'I.�_•jA .i I AA AA . . ;r,, i a, �;z 11I _ 1 A T 1 * r �t'�• n—xa .r ]11.} r R` '1 1 _ �1 n ]N — �{#„ r+s• O I 1 yl 1 ---- 1 — R--• -�"-- ....-- . Fl '• PI-- L+• !. _+. 4n , F-I I I I I U Wit I I. @ ■ Tlii a (n z 1 1 `I It Ul ! . ■■ W" j'1I' - 9.rwrr.aL+1 v.r1r w. __ i.iw A.r %[;i I 1 II E I� Q - a -- 1' T '�' .Y4.14 — J�--_ 1r1. .w� -' �.j /'• ..wr `I Y 6 lJ 11 1 y KR• a..rrA! •• a1r. .r�.. l..r. -- : A.M9•I -- 1,p1Y 11 11 1 U r_l LIPD AvEN1E II — rr••— _ - - • - — _ _ ���7. — — a O O . . `aN — u ass. i—. rao"� 0• z z a — ti LINDq , __ 0. na I / rw tsts se,-- \ / ao.m��..Ira...K • o.= In : •' I I� • SITE PLAN r- -•t_. —_r m I i F SD-1 .a.t,... m , - III . Ic,, 1 . Iup I = 10/19/99 06:45 an CACAD•98JOuuL.\SD-1.a•a • . . ,:e.65i1'•sr;:x:y 1,, G3 • 19 T23N RSE W 1/2• i�` '' SW 23rd St _ IH IH IL w rth St CA \R- . _ SY 27th St SW 27th St. • IM R C ` SW .29, h St 1 • N a \ w 8 g S gOth St. w N • in N :. IH CA i • IL N I IL 167 34th St SW 34th St. W 34th; St. , IL / . L IH -ci i j IL IM C\S 39th St. Q CA ic), '1 IM IM 1st St. SW 41st St. pf6-11 1 e 13 31T23NR5EW1/2 �` c-0 `• .ZONING. .r;'r' --- � -_ .. ---.---1.4600 - - - - --- - ---- H P/1/PW TECHNICAL EEAVICEB ___. -- Y�.,�y ,�„ 30 T23N R5E W 1/2 — - t AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Charlotte Ann Kassens first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of the SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETEMINATION 600 S. Washington Avenue, Kent, Washington 98032 ENVIRONMENTALREVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON,WASHINGTON a daily newspaper published seven (7) times a week. Said newspaper is a legal The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non- newspaper of general publication and is now and has been for more than six months Significance - Mitigated for the following prior to the date of publication, referred to, printed and published in the English language project under the authority of the Renton continually as a daily newspaper in Kent, King County, Washington. The South County Municipal Code. Journal has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the PACIFIC GULF PROPERTIES State of Washington for King County. LUA-99-105,SA-H,ECF Proposal to construct a warehouse and The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the South County office building. Location: 3600 & 3800 Journal (and not in supplemental form) which was regularly distributed to the subscribers Lind Ave.sw. during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a Appeals of the environmenntal determina- tion must be filed in writing on or before Pacific Gulf Properties as published on: 12/20/99 5:00 PM January 3, 2000. Appeals must be filed in writing together $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Rentonwith, 1055the South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of$51.75, to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11B. charged to Acct. No. 8051 Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510.A Legal Number 6994 Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor Legal Clerk, South Ounty ournal of City Hall, January 11, 2000 at 9:00 AM to consider the site plan approval. If the Environmental Determination is appealed, Subscribed and sworn before me on this c - day of , - , 19.4_ the appeal will be heard as part of this pub- lic hearing. Interested parties are invited to attend the public hearing. ``oq�onnq� &L, - Published in the South County Journal ``e�� �IA f.1,,r►i�F�i, La t X. [d December 20, 1999,6994 -- A.;_�\. .-, . Notary Public of the State of Washington 4' i V�3TAR' "�'-G' _ .' 1. r residing in Renton --o-- y' King County, Washington ..O AL-3 Li'v o: ' C G'ell•* ? 62 �; :. , ."1147 ,ANN, 0.``�� S. CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 11, day of 1-j< , 1999, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing 41v114�itl Gl 1 S documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing Department of Ecology Don Hurter WSDOT KC Wastewater Treatment Division Larry Fisher Washington Department of Fisheries David F. Dietzman Department of Natural Resources Shirley Lukhang Seattle Public Utilities Duwamish Indian Tribe Rod Malcom Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Joe Jainga Puget Sound Energy (Signature of Sender) v STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that a signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for 01.6 uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated. �1r,11r� �Y ) 1 it} Q�rv� if; r Notary Public in d for the State of Washi • NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF WASHINGTON Notary (Print) COMMISSION EXPIRES My appointme AMOHEFF JUNE 29,2003 MV' I Project Name: Ric, (_ Gulf rvot,e111-6. Project Number: LUA . qq , IUS SW —ti- ELr NOTARY.DOC S. am. NO110E ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: PACIFIC GULF PROPERTIES PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-99-105,SA-H,ECF Proposal to construct a 106,752 sq.ft.warehouse/office building. The building footprint would be • approximately 98,752 sq.ft.with an additional 8,000 sq.ft.of mezzanine.The front of the building facing Lind Ave.SW would have four recessed areas of loading docks and Vass-front office entries. The back of the building would have on-grade loading access.Access is proposed via three(3)drives off Lind Ave. SW. The north access is an existing driveway to be used in common with Farwest Steel and the south access Is the existing back exit for the Act III Theaters. The proposal would construct one additional driveway cut In the center of the site frontage. The site plan includes 234 parking spaces. A wetland area that was created for mitigation for the Home Base and Act III Theater projects is located on the east part of the site. The proposal maintains a 25-foot undisturbed buffer width from the wetland edge. Location:3600 6 3800 Lind Avenue SW. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed In writing on or before 5:00 PM January 3,2000. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required$75.00 application fee with:Hearing Examiner,City of Renton,1053 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11B.Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office,(425)430-6510. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting In the Council Chambers on the 7th floor of City Hall,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,Washington,on January 11,2000 at 9:00 AM to consider the Site Plan Approval. if the Environmental Determination is appealed,the public hearing. appeal will be heard as part of this 11111111 t RI I. l�II! ii de v 'liWk,F► = wk, v a I I11 iiii•InmDI _o,t. a>fI • �,o.�1 11111 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION,PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON,DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT( DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUTj430-7200.PROPER AUTHORIZATION IPlease Include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. CERTIFICATION I, 1�ICA , hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document were posted by me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on -nu - 1 j� I q.q q • • Signed: �� ,(^_______ ATTEST: Subcribed and sworn efore me,a Nortary Pubh`ctt n- for the State of Washington residing in '} ,c ,L, ,-, ,on the t day of 6Le c (c/GI • 4 MARILYN KAMCHEFF r NOTARYPUBLIC • 71 cQ STATE OF WASHINGTON ` ✓ COMMISSION EXPIRES 11. .:, MARILYN KAMCHEFF A.;c;.c. 2003 MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES:6-29-03 CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING JANUARY 11, 2000 AGENDA COMMENCING AT 9:00 AM, COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 7TH FLOOR, RENTON CITY HALL The application(s) listed are in order of application number only and not necessarily the order in which they will be heard. Items will be called for hearing at the discretion of the Hearing Examiner. PROJECT NAME: Pacific Gulf Properties PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-99-105,SA-H,ECF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Proposal to construct a 106,752 sq. ft. warehouse/office building. The building footprint would be approximately 98,752 sq. ft. with an additional 8,000 sq. ft. of mezzanine. The front of the building facing Lind Ave. SW would have four recessed areas of loading docks and glass-front office entries. The back of the building would have on-grade loading access. Access is proposed via three (3)drives off Lind Ave. SW. The north access is an existing driveway to be used in common with Farwest Steel and the south access is the existing back exit for the Act III Theaters. The proposal would construct one additional driveway cut in the center of the site frontage. The site plan includes 234 parking spaces. A wetland area that was created for mitigation for the Home Base and Act III Theater projects is located on the east part of the site. The proposal maintains a 25-foot undisturbed buffer width from the wetland edge. Location: 3600 &3800 Lind Avenue SW. PROJECT NAME: Boeing Parking Lot PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-99-155,SA-H,ECF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The Boeing Company is proposing the development of a 2,727-stall parking lot on a 22.45-acre site for existing company employees of the Boeing Renton Plant. Lot 6, which is currently utilized by employees, will be decommissioned after the completion of the proposed parking area. The subject property is zoned Heavy Industrial (IH) on the north two-thirds of the site and Commercial Office (CO) on the south third. In addition to Environmental (SEPA) Review, the project is required to obtain Hearing Examiner Site Plan Approval. Location: NE corner of Park Avenue North and North 8th Street. Agnda City of Renton PUBLIC Department of Planning/Building/Public Works HEARING PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: Public Hearing Date: January 11, 2000 Project Name: Pacific Gulf Properties Applicant/ Barton Treece Address: Treece& Company, Inc. 320 2nd Avenue South Kirkland, WA. 98033 Owner/ Powell-Orillia L.L.C. Address: 737 Market Street Kirkland, WA. 98033 File Number: LUA-099-105, SA-H, ECF Project Manager: Peter Rosen Project Description: Proposal to construct a 106,752 sq. ft. industrial warehouse/office building. The building footprint would be approximately 98,752 sq. ft. with an additional 8,000 sq. ft. of mezzanine. The front of the building facing Lind Ave. SW would have four recessed areas of loading docks and glass-front office entries. The back of the building would have on-grade loading access. Access is proposed via three (3) drives off Lind Ave. SW. The north access is an existing driveway to be used in common with Farwest Steel and the south access is the existing back exit for the Act III Theaters. The proposal would construct one additional driveway cut in the center of the site frontage. The site plan includes 234 parking spaces. A wetland area that was created for mitigation for the Home Base and Act III Theater projects is located on the east part of the site. The proposal maintains a 25-foot undisturbed buffer width from the wetland edge. Project Location: 3600 &3800 Lind Avenue SW illi vpi rnin . dil .i: 1* Nam i■. mi. ,IL , 1 P. j t: " ilian PIII m li -Y_ gm lai"ll Mai ' mi t' 4 MI )-----)R 7 Zj City of Renton P/B/PW Department . .Jliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner PACIFIC GULF PROPERTIES LUA-99-105, SA-H,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: JANUARY 11, 2000 Page 2 of 7 B. GENERAL INFORMATION: I. Owner of Record: Powell-Orillia L.L.C. 2. Zoning Designation: Medium Industrial (IM) 3. Comprehensive Plan Employment Area-Valley(EAV) Land Use Designation: 4. Existing Site Use: undeveloped 5. Neighborhood Characteristics: North: U.S. Rentals, Farwest Steel East: Home Base,Act III Cinemas South: Industrial, Commercial West: Industrial 6. Access: Lind Avenue SW. 7. Site Area: 7.39 acres 8. Project Data: area comments Existing Building Area: NA New Building Area: 106,752 sq.ft. 98,752 sq.ft.ground floor,8,000 sq.ft. mezzanine Total Building Area: 106,752 sq.ft. C. HISTORICAL/BACKGROUND: Action Land Use File No. Ordinance No. Date Annexation 1745 04-14-59 Annexation 1764 05-19-59 Annexation 1928 12-19-61 Annexation 4040 02-09-87 Comprehensive Plan 4498 02-20-95 Zoning 4404 06-07-93 D. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE: 1. Medium Industrial (IM) Use Table, Section 4-2-070Q 2. Medium Industrial (IM) Development Standards, Section 4-2-130A 3. Site Plan Review, Section 4-9-200 Hexreport.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department . ....Iminary Report to the Hearing Examiner PACIFIC GULF PROPERTIES LUA-99-105, SA-H,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: JANUARY 11, 2000 Page 3 of 7 4. Parking Regulations, Section 4-4-080 E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: 1. Employment Area Valley(EAV) F. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND The applicant proposes to construct a 106,752 sq. ft. industrial warehouse/office building. The building footprint would be approximately 98,752 sq. ft. with an additional 8,000 sq. ft. of mezzanine. The front of the building facing Lind Ave. SW would have four recessed areas of loading docks and glass-front office entries. The back of the building would have on-grade loading access. An employee area with a picnic bench and bike rack is proposed at the northwest corner of the building. Access is proposed via three (3) drives off Lind Ave. SW. The north access is an existing driveway to be used in common with Farwest Steel and the south access is the existing back exit for the Act III Theaters. The proposal would construct one additional driveway cut in the center of the site frontage. The site plan includes 234 parking spaces. A wetland area that was created for mitigation for the Home Base and Act III Theater projects is located on the east part of the site. The proposal maintains a 25-foot undisturbed buffer width from the wetland edge. 2. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.21C, 1971 as amended), on December 14, 1999 the Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated. The appeal period for the SEPA threshold determination ended on January 3, 2000. No appeals were filed on the SEPA environmental determination. The applicant will be required to comply with all SEPA mitigation measures as listed below. 3. COMPLIANCE WITH ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (SEPA) MITIGATION MEASURES 1. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of $0.52 per square foot of new construction. This fee is estimated at $55,511.04. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 2. The applicant shall record a restrictive covenant on the property stating that tenant parking needs shall be analyzed prior to building permit issuance, including tenant improvements. If the ultimate user of the property exceeds the number of employees from what is expected for a typical warehouse/distribution use or is a fleet-based user with higher parking demands, then further environmental review and additional parking may be required prior to issuance of a building permit and/or business license. The restrictive covenant shall be submitted to the Hexreport.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department ,-,eliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner PACIFIC GULF PROPERTIES LUA-99-105, SA-H, ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: JANUARY 11, 2000 Page 4 of 7 Development Services Division and approved by the City Attorney prior to recording. The restrictive covenant shall be recorded prior to issuance of building permits. 3. The applicant shall be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of $75 for each average daily trip associated with the project. The Traffic Mitigation Fee is estimated at $63,750. This fee is payable prior to issuance of Building Permits. 4. STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS Representatives from various city departments have reviewed the application materials to identify and address site plan issues from the proposed development. These comments are contained in the official file, and the essence of the comments has been incorporated into the appropriate sections of this report and the Departmental Recommendation at the end of the report. 5. CONSISTENCY WITH SITE PLAN APPROVAL CRITERIA Section 4-9-200.E. "The Hearing Examiner and City staff shall review and act upon site plans based upon comprehensive planning considerations and the following criteria. These criteria are objectives of good site plans to be aimed for in development within the City of Renton. However, strict compliance with any one or more particular criterion may not be necessary or reasonable. These criteria also provide a frame of reference for the applicant in developing a site, but are not intended to be inflexible standards or to discourage creativity and innovation. The Site Plan Review criteria include, but are not limited to, the following:" GENERAL CRITERIA: (1) CONFORMANCE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, ITS ELEMENTS & POLICIES The subject site is located within the Employment Area-Valley (EAV) Comprehensive Plan designation. The EAV land use designation was adopted for the entire Green River Valley area by the City Council in August 1996. The overall objective of the EAV designation is to: Provide for a mix of employment-based uses, including commercial, office and industrial development to support the economic development of the City of Renton. The industrial/warehouse use is consistent with the EAV Comprehensive Plan policies, which emphasize employment-based uses. The subject site is surrounded by a variety of uses that have located in the Valley since adoption of the EAV Comprehensive Plan designation. Home Base and the Act Ill Cinemas are adjacent to the east and U.S. Rentals is adjacent to the north. The EAV policies encourage a mix of uses and promote compatible or related land uses to locate in close proximity. There are wetlands and wetland buffers that would separate the proposed industrial/warehouse use from Home Base and the Act Ill Cinemas. The policies also encourage quality development in the Valley. The proposal includes dock high loading doors in the front of the building which are recessed, and glass-fronted offices are oriented to the street frontage. This would reduce the dominant appearance of the warehouse/ industrial use. Policies encourage designing facilities to share access and parking areas. The north access driveway is an existing driveway to be used in common with Farwest Steel and the south driveway access is the existing back exit for the Act Ill Theaters. The subject proposal also includes substantial street frontage landscaping as promoted in the policies. The landscape strip along Lind Avenue SW is 20-feet wide on site and 10 feet of improved right-of-way. It would be planted with a double row of street trees. Hexreport.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department rreliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner PACIFIC GULF PROPERTIES LUA-99-105, SA-H, ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: JANUARY 11,2000 Page 5 of 7 (2) CONFORMANCE WITH EXISTING LAND USE REGULATIONS The subject site is located in the Medium Industrial (IM) zone. The proposal is speculative and no specific tenants have been identified at the time of application. The proposal is planned for an approximate mix of 40% office, 30% warehouse, and 30% manufacturing use. The IM zone allows for warehousing and storage as a primary permitted use and manufacturing/processing/ assembly of many products is also allowed as a primary permitted use. Offices (administrative headquarters and personal offices) are allowed in the IM zone as secondary uses subject to the condition that these offices shall be associated with a primary permitted use on the same site or a contiguous site. The office uses may be developed in conjunction with, or subsequent to, the industrial use. The office uses may serve the administrative needs of employees company-wide including those employees located on other sites. Approximately 60% of the proposed building is planned for warehouse and manufacturing uses, primary uses in the IM zone. It appears from the plans that the front office uses are intended to serve the primary uses of manufacturing and warehousing, consistent with the secondary use condition. Setbacks —The IM zone requires a front yard setback of 20 feet on arterial streets. Lind Avenue is classified as a minor arterial on the 20-year arterial plan in the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed building is setback a minimum of 85 feet from the front property line along Lind Avenue SW. No rear or side yard setbacks are required in the IM zone. Landscaping—The IM zone requires a minimum landscape width along arterial streets of 10% of the lot depth or 20 feet, whichever is less. The site plan indicates a 20-foot on-site landscape strip fronting Lind Avenue SW. The adjacent right-of-way (approximately 10 to 20 feet in width)would also be improved with landscaping and a sidewalk. The front landscape strip would be planted with a staggered double row of street trees and lawn. A bioswale is proposed in the front landscape strip, similar to other adjacent development. The subject site is located within the Green River Valley planning area. The code requires that 2% of the site area be provided as natural/wildlife landscaping per a mitigation agreement with the Soil Conservation Service (SCS). The landscape plan does not indicate the required natural landscape area. However, along the east property boundary, abutting the wetland buffer, is a 25- foot wide landscape area planted with a variety of native trees and shrubs. The landscape plants include Red Cedar, Willow, Pacific Ninebark, Snowberry, etc. This landscape area exceeds the required 2% of the site area and therefore meets the code standard. The location of this landscape area, adjacent to the wetland buffer, is appropriate for maximizing habitat value. The Parking Regulations require a minimum of 5% landscaping for parking lots exceeding 10,000 square feet. The landscape plan shows landscape islands in the parking lot but there is no accompanying information to confirm that the landscaping meets the required standard. The applicant should provide staff with further information to demonstrate compliance with the code requirement. Parking and Loading - The site plan includes a total of 210 parking spaces based on an anticipated mix of 40% office, 30% warehouse, and 30% manufacturing use. This mix of uses would require a minimum of 181 parking spaces and a maximum of 261 according to parking regulations. The applicant has planned for 30% office use which has the highest parking requirements. This is a high ratio of office use for projects of this nature and therefore the parking counts are probably adequate for the uses that could occupy the proposed building. However, the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) had concerns that parking requirements are difficult to assess with a speculative project. Future tenants may generate a need for parking that cannot be anticipated at this time. Therefore, ERC imposed a SEPA mitigation to require that tenant parking needs be analyzed prior to building permit issuance, including tenant improvements. If the ultimate user of the property exceeds the number of employees from what is expected for a typical warehouse/distribution use or is a fleet-based user with higher parking demands, then further environmental review and additional parking may be required prior to issuance of a building permit and/or business license. The front of the proposed building has four recessed areas of dock high loading doors. The back of the building has on-grade loading access. The Parking Regulations require a minimum 100- foot clear maneuvering area for dock high loading doors and 45-feet for ground level loading Hexreport.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department rreliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner PACIFIC GULF PROPERTIES LUA-99-105, SA-H, ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: JANUARY 11, 2000 Page 6 of 7 doors. The proposal maintains the required clear maneuvering area from the front dock high loading doors and the ground level loading doors at the back of the building. Wetlands - The east boundary of the site includes a portion of a wetland area that continues off- site to the east. This wetland was created as compensatory mitigation for the Home Base and Act Ill Cinemas projects, located to the east of the subject property. City wetland regulations state that wetlands created or restored as a part of a mitigation project are considered regulated wetlands. The edge of the created wetland has been delineated by B-twelve Associates and then surveyed. The proposal would not impact the wetland and the site plan includes a 25-foot wide buffer from the delineated edge of the wetland. The created wetland replaced a Category 3 wetland. Category 3 wetlands require a minimum 25-foot wide buffer. The site plan complies with City wetland regulations. Parcel Lines — The subject site is composed of two separate legal parcels and the proposed building is bisected by an existing lot line. To rectify this situation, the applicant should either record a lot line adjustment to remove or adjust the lot line or record a restrictive covenant to prohibit the sale of one of the parcels. (3) MITIGATION OF IMPACTS TO SURROUNDING PROPERTIES AND USES; The proposed industrial/warehouse/office use would not adversely impact surrounding properties and uses. The site layout, building design and functioning of the proposal would be similar to the numerous industrial/warehouse developments that are located in the Valley and in the near vicinity of the site. The local road system is planned to serve industrial/warehouse distribution uses. A wetland and its associated buffer buffers the industrial site from adjacent commercial uses to the east (Home Base and Act Ill Cinemas). A railway corridor separates the site from U.S. Rentals and Farwest Steel to the north. (4) MITIGATION OF IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN TO THE SITE; The subject site is relatively flat and cleared of primary vegetation. As discussed previously, there is a wetland area on the east part of the site that was created to compensate for wetland impacts resulting from the Home Base and Act Ill Cinemas projects. The proposal maintains the required 25-foot buffer from the delineated wetland edge. There are no other significant natural features on the site that would be impacted by the proposal. The proposal includes stormwater detention facilities to handle increased runoff from impervious surfaces. The layout of the building, parking and circulation is appropriate for the size and configuration of the property and therefore the proposed site plan would not adversely impact the site. (5) CONSERVATION OF AREA-WIDE PROPERTY VALUES; The proposal to construct an industrial/warehouse/office building on an undeveloped parcel would conserve area-wide property values. (6) SAFETY AND EFFICIENCY OF VEHICLE AND PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATIONi Access to the proposed building would be from three (3) driveways off Lind Ave. SW. Two of the driveways are existing and would be shared with surrounding uses. The north access is an existing driveway to be used in common with Farwest Steel and the south access is the existing back drive exit for the Act Ill Theaters. The proposal would construct one additional driveway cut in the center of the site frontage. The use of existing, shared driveways is a positive aspect of the proposal. City Transportation and Public Works staff prefers minimizing new curbcuts on arterial streets such as Lind Avenue SW. The proposal includes several pedestrian connections between the sidewalk and office entries. Hexreport.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department rreliminaiy Report to the Hearing Examiner PACIFIC GULF PROPERTIES LUA-99-105, SA-H,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: JANUARY 11, 2000 Page 7 of 7 (7) PROVISION OF ADEQUATE LIGHT AND AIR; There are adequate setbacks and distance between the proposed building and adjacent buildings to allow for adequate light and air to reach buildings. (8) MITIGATION OF NOISE, ODORS AND OTHER HARMFUL OR UNHEALTHY CONDITIONS; Construction activities would generate noise and odors. However, the construction mitigation plan specifically includes measures to minimize construction impacts. Construction hours are limited by City Code and the construction activity and associated impacts would be temporary. The specific uses that would occupy the proposed building are not known at this time. It is anticipated that uses would be similar to those found in comparable industrial/warehouse buildings. State and local regulations would limit potential noise or odor impacts and other harmful or unhealthy conditions. (9) AVAILABILITY OF PUBLIC SERVICES AND FACILITIES TO ACCOMMODATE THE PROPOSED USE; AND Adequate public services and facilities are available to accommodate the proposal. The applicant would be responsible for extending utilities to serve the proposed building in compliance with City standards. Details of utility requirements are listed in the Advisory Notes of the Environmental Review Report. (10) PREVENTION OF NEIGHBORHOOD DETERIORATION AND BLIGHT. The proposal would develop a vacant site with a use that is consistent with zoning. The proposed building would buffer the existing wetland area from the street and finish off the back side of the Home Base/Act III Cinemas complex. Development of the vacant parcel would serve to prevent neighborhood deterioration and blight. G. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Pacific Gulf Properties Project File No. LUA-99-105, SA-H, ECF subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall verify that the parking area includes a minimum of 5% interior parking lot landscaping, in order to comply with the code standard. The landscape plan shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division, prior to issuance of building permits. 2. The applicant shall either record a lot line adjustment to remove or adjust the lot line that bisects the proposed building, or record a restrictive covenant to prohibit the sale of one of the underlying parcels. The lot line adjustment shall be approved or the covenant shall be recorded prior to issuance of building permits. A covenant requires approval of the Development Services Division and City Attorney prior to recordation. EXPIRATION PERIODS: Site Plan Approvals (SA): Two (2)years from the final approval (signature) date. Hexreport.doc CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-99-105,SA-H,ECF APPLICANT: Barton Treece PROJECT NAME: Pacific Gulf Properties DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construct a 106,752 sq. ft. warehouse/office building. The building footprint would be approximately 98,752 sq. ft. with an additional 8,000 sq. ft. of mezzanine. The front of the building facing Lind Ave. SW would have four recessed areas of loading docks and glass- front office entries. The back of the building would have on-grade loading access. Access is proposed via three (3) drives off Lind Ave. SW. The north access is an existing driveway to be used in common with Farwest Steel and the south access is the existing back exit for the Act III Theaters. The proposal would construct one additional driveway cut in the center of the site frontage. The site plan includes 234 parking spaces. A wetland area that was created for mitigation for the Home Base and Act III Theater projects is located on the east part of the site. The proposal maintains a 25-foot undisturbed buffer width from the wetland edge. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 3600 &3800 Lind Avenue SW MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of $0.52 per square foot of new construction. This fee is estimated at $55,511.04. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 2. The applicant shall record a restrictive covenant on the property stating that tenant parking needs shall be analyzed prior to building permit issuance, including tenant improvements. If the ultimate user of the property exceeds the number of employees from what is expected for a typical warehouse/distribution use or is a fleet-based user with higher parking demands, then further environmental review and additional parking may be required prior to issuance of a building permit and/or business license. The restrictive covenant shall be submitted to the Development Services Division and approved by the City Attorney prior to recording. The restrictive covenant shall be recorded prior to issuance of building permits. 3. The applicant shall be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of $75 for each average daily trip 1 associated with the project. The Traffic Mitigation Fee is estimated at $63,750. This fee is payable prior to issuance of Building Permits. CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES • APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-99-105,SA-H,ECF APPLICANT: Barton Treece PROJECT NAME: Pacific Gulf Properties DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construct a 106,752 sq. ft. warehouse/office building. The building footprint would be approximately 98,752 sq. ft. with an additional 8,000 sq. ft. of mezzanine. The front of the building facing Lind Ave. SW would have four recessed areas of loading docks and glass- front office entries. The back of the building would have on-grade loading access. Access is proposed via three (3) drives off Lind Ave. SW. The north access is an existing driveway to be used in common with Farwest Steel and the south access is the existing back exit for the Act III Theaters. The proposal would construct one additional driveway cut in the center of the site frontage. The site plan includes 234 parking spaces. A wetland area that was created for mitigation for the Home Base and Act III Theater projects is located on the east part of the site. The proposal maintains a 25-foot undisturbed buffer width from the wetland edge. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 3600&3800 Lind Avenue SW Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. BUILDING Compliance with 1997 editions of Uniform Codes and 1999 NEC. FIRE 1. The preliminary fire flow is 4000 GPM, which requires one hydrant within 150 feet of the building and three additional hydrants within 300 feet of the building. A looped water main is required. 2. Separate plans and permits are required for the installation of required fire alarm and sprinkler systems. 3. Provide a list of any flammable, combustible liquids or hazardous chemicals that are to be used or stored on site. PLAN REVIEW Water 1. The Water System Development Connection Charge is $0.113 per gross square foot of site area, but not less than $850. 2. A vertical profile will be required showing the water system. 3. Station numbers to be shown on the loop water line. Also, show station number and off-set for water valves. 4. Two (2) additional valves will be required on the loop water main that extends to the three (3) proposed fire hydrants. 5. Maintain a minimum 7.5-foot separation from the storm line at the south end of the project. 6. A 5-inch storz adapter will be required on all new or existing hydrants used to meet the required fire flow standards. 7. Domestic and irrigation meter size and location to be shown. Also show size and location of the sprinkler system with the backflow prevention device. 8. Drawings to meet City of Renton drafting standards. • Pacific Gulf Properties LUA-99-105,SA-H,ECF Advisory Notes (continued) Page 2 of 2 9. Looped water main to be in a 15-foot utility easement. Storm/Surface Water 1. The Storm System Development Connection Charge is $0.129 per square foot of new impervious surface area, but not less than $385. Show on plan the amount of new impervious surface area and the square feet of wetlands on the site. 2. Construction plans to use NAVD 1988 datum for elevations. 1. The design of the detention pond must demonstrate adequacy for detention, water quality and conveyance capacity. 2. Show vertical profile of storm line on construction plans. 3. Drawings need to show where water will drain to at the north end of the building. 4. The project is required to meet King County 1990 Surface Water Design manual requirements. The Preliminary Drainage Report appears to be acceptable. Wastewater 1. The Sewer System Development Connection Charge is $0.078 per gross square feet of site area, but not less than $850. Show total square feet of site area and show area of any wetlands on site. 2. A clean-out is required 5-feet out from the building. 3. If the project produce fats, oil, or grease, then an appropriate removal system will be required per plumbing code. 4. A backflow prevention device is required on the sewer line if the floor elevation is below 25-feet. Show the floor elevation on the plans. 5. Sewer line to have a 2% slope to property line. 6. Show vertical clearances over or under existing 16-inch water main. 7. Drawings to meet City of Renton drafting standards. 8. A vertical profile will be required. Transportation 1. A six (6) foot sidewalk is required to be located on Lind Avenue SW with the back edge of the sidewalk located at the property line and a minimum 6-foot planter strip located between the curb and sidewalk. 2. Driveway entrance at the south end and front of the building to be located a distance of 50 feet from the curb line of Lind Avenue SW. PLANNING 1. Garbage and recyclable deposit areas and collection points shall be easily and safely accessible to hauling trucks. POLICE Theft from construction sites is one of the most common reported crimes in the City. To protect materials and equipment it is recommended that all materials and tools be locked up when not in use. The site will need security lighting and any construction trailer should be completely fenced in with portable chain-link fencing. The fence will provide both a physical and psychological barrier to any prospective thief and will demonstrate that this area is private property. Construction trailers should be kept locked when not in use, and should also have a heavy-duty deadbolt installed with no less than a 1 1/2 inch throw when bolted. Glass windows in the trailer should be shatter-resistant. I also recommend the business post the appropriate"No Trespassing"signs on the property while it's under construction. This will aid police in making arrests on the property after hours if suspects are observed vandalizing or stealing building materials. re y Pacific Gulf Properties 3600 &3800 Lind Avenue SW Environmental Review/WO#78564 November 22, 1999 TRANSPORTATION: 1. The traffic mitigation fee is $75 dollars per new trip generated as determined from the ITE Tripe Generation Manual. Estimated trips are.850 daily trips per the The Transpo Group. $75 x 850 (Daily trips)=$63,750 2. A Six (6) foot side walk is required to be located on Lind Ave. SW with the back edge of the side located at the property line and a minimum or greater 6-foot planter strip located between the curb and sidewalk. 3. Driveway entrance at the south end and front of the building is to close to a signalised interestion and is to be eliminated. 99cm100T 99CM100T.DOC\ A t' CITY OF RENTON FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU MEMORANDUM DATE: December 8, 1999 TO: Peter Rosen, Planner FROM: Jim Gray, Assistant Fire Marshal\ S- — SUBJECT: Pacific Gulf Properties, 3600& 38 0 Lind Av SW MITIGATION ITEMS; p� per — 1. A fire mitigation fee of$55,511.04.08 is required based on $.52Ccs `� C square foot of the building square footage. 7 .`V Q_A Est FIRE CODE REQUIREMENTS: 1. The preliminary fire flow is 4,000 GPM, one hydrant is required within 150 feet of the structure and three additional hydrants are required within 300 feet of the structure. A looped water main is required to be looped around the building. 2. Separate plans and permit are required for the installation of the required fire alarm and sprinkler systems. 3. Fire Department access roadways are required to within 150 feet of all portions of the building exterior. Roadways are a minimum 20 in width with a turning radius of 45 foot outside and 25 foot inside. 4. Provide a list of the flammable, combustible liquids and any hazardous chemical to be used or stored on site. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. City of Department of Planning/Building/Public 6,,Ks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Pa. COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 22, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA99-105,SA-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: NOVEMBER 8, 1999 APPLICANT: Barton Treece PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen PROJECT TITLE: Pacific Gulf Properties WORK ORDER NO: 78564 LOCATION: 3600&3800 Lind Avenue SW SITE AREA: 7.39 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): 106,752 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construct a 106,752 sq. ft.warehouse/office building. The building footprint would be approximately 98,752 sq. ft. with an additional 8,000 sq. ft. of mezzanine. The front of the building facing Lind Ave. SW would have four recessed areas of loading docks and glass-front office entries. The back of the building would have on-grade loading access. Access is proposed via three (3)drives off Lind Ave. SW. The north access is an existing driveway to be used in common with Farwest Steel and the south access is the existing back exit for the Act III Theaters. The proposal would construct one additional driveway cut in the center of the site frontage. The site plan includes 234 parking spaces. A wetland area that was created for mitigation for the Home Base and Act Ill Theater projects is located on the east part of the site. The proposal maintains a 25-foot undisturbed buffer width from the wetland edge. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet ,,PrUAZ if2 () 74-n - A-- .4P B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS da_r_c74,,e 7-L--1/26/aeffr---70/ t/ce. /q6/C1-4a ?C'/-"a1/`c _e_,raect o'er ` /6 �M C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS 7ZIL4 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas w e additional information is nee d to properly assess this proposal. � // /a ?7 ignature irector P /or Authori ed a resen a ye Date routingtorrn Rev.10/93 Pacific Gulf Properties 3600 &3800 Lind Avenue SW Environmental Review/WO#78564 November 22, 1999 SEWER: 1. The Sewer System Development Connection charge is $0.078 per gross site area. Show total square feet of site area and show area of any wetlands on site. 2. A clean-out is required 5-feet out from the building. 3. A backflow prevention device is required on the sewer line if the floor elevation is below 25-ft. Show the floor elevation the plans. 4. Show vertical clearances over or under existing 16-inch water main. 4. Sewer line to have a slope of 2%to the property line. 5. If the project produce fats, oils, or grease, then an appropriate removal system will be required per plumbing code . 6. Drawings to meet City of Renton drafting Standards. 7. A verical profile will be required. 99cmlOOS 99CM100S.DOC\ • Pacific Gulf Properties 3600 &3800 Lind Avenue SW Environmental Review/WO# 78564 November 22, 1999 STORM DRAINAGE: 1. The Storm System Development Connection charge is $0.129 per square foot of new impervious surface area, but not less than $385. Show on plan the amount of new imperious surface area and the square feet of wetlands on the site. j2. The design of the detention pond must demonstrate adequacy for detention, water quality and conveyance capacity. 3. Use NAVD 1988 datum for elevations. 4. Show vertical profile of storm line on construction plan. '5. Drawings need to show where water will drain to at the north end of the building. 6. The project to meet King County 1990 Surface Water Design manual requirements. The Preliminary Drainage Report appears to be acceptable. 99cm100D 99CM100D.DOC\ Pacific Gulf Properties 3600&3800 Lind Avenue SW Environmental Review/WO# 78564 November 22, 1999 WATER: 1. The Water System Development Connection charge is $0.113 per gross site square feet. 2. Station numbers to be shown on the loop water line. Also show station number and off-set for water valves. 3. Two (2) additional valves will be require on the loop water main that extends to the three (3) proposed fire hydrants. 4. Maintain a minimum of 7.5-foot separation from the storm line at the south end of the project. 5. A 5-inch storz adapter will be require on all new or existing hydrants used to me the required fire flow standards. 6. Domestic and irrigation meter size and location to be shown. Also show size and location of the sprinkler system with the backflow prevention device. 7. Drawings to meet City of Renton drafting Standards. /8. A vertical profile will be required. 9. Loop Water Main to be in a 15-ft utility easement. 99cm100W 99CM100W.DOC\ PROJECT LUA-99-105, SA-H, ECF Pacific Gulf Properties City of Renton Department of Planning / Building / Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET (Continuation) POLICE RELATED COMMENTS 55.19 Police Calls for Service Estimated Annually CONSTRUCTION PHASE Theft from construction sites is one of the most common reported crimes in the city. To protect materials and equipment it is recommended that all materials and tools be locked up when not in use. The site will need security lighting and any construction trailer should be completely fenced in with portable chain-link fencing. The fence will provide both a physical and psychological barrier to any prospective thief and will demonstrate that this area is private property. Construction trailers should be kept locked when not in use, and should also have a heavy-duty deadbolt installed with no less then a 1-1/2" throw when bolted. Glass windows in the trailer should be shatter-resistant. I also recommend the business post the appropriate "No Trespassing" signs on the property while it's under construction (flier attached). This will aid police in making arrests on the property after hours if suspects are observed vandalizing or stealing building materials. Page 1 of 1 City of r.enton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:CCIA-vl ct-1QV1 SEW l(U'7 COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 22, 1 99 APPLICATION NO: LUA99-105,SA-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: NOVEMBER 8, APPLICANT: Barton Treece PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen 11W1rOdd1 PROJECT TITLE: Pacific Gulf Properties WORK ORDER NO: 78564 LOCATION: 3600&3800 Lind Avenue SW r•, :l 'h/j {b SITE AREA: 7.39 acres 1 BUILDING AREA(gross): 106,752 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construct a 106,752 sq. ft.warehouse/office building. The building footprint would be approximately 98,752 sq. ft.with an additional 8,000 sq. ft. of mezzanine. The front of the building facing Lind Ave. SW would have four recessed areas of loading docks and glass-front office entries. The back of the building would have on-grade loading access. Access is proposed via three (3)drives off Lind Ave. SW. The north access is an existing driveway to be used in common with Farwest Steel and the south access is the existing back exit for the Act III Theaters. The proposal would construct one additional driveway cut in the center of the site frontage. The site plan includes 234 parking spaces. A wetland area that was created for mitigation for the Home Base and Act Ill Theater projects is located on the east part of the site. The proposal maintains a 25-foot undisturbed buffer width from the wetland edge. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet • B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED MMENTS' ,v We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas whe additional information is needed properly assess this proposal. LA. -"*. 1/,02-fi Si ture oT Director uthor Re esentative Date routingforrn Rev.10/93 G3 • 19 TZ3N R5E W 1/Z \\ SW 23rd St f I • IH IH IL 5 • w th St CA R , . SW 27th St SW 27th St. I I I • IM RC SW 29:h St a AI • N S goth St. , z 3 3 . IH CA c AIL IL N 167 34th St SW 34th St. SW 34th St. IL . iL I H q 0 cu IL w IM _ �SW 39th St. Q j IL u CA ;:, IM IM CA l 1st St. SW 41st St. 1 13 • 31 T23N R5E W 1/2 . 0° ZONING H3• " r�arw TECHNICAL pumas 4•& ,. � ' 30 T23N R5E W 1/2 .ZO NG MAP BOOS" • . - .,.„, , . ..ms_ ,.,. ��,,.w > :> ,2:::: :: E ' 93 : 5 MI Li t .I :•v__ 1 - a 4i cr�14 ii:1 ` [i � . t I 4 ili,:.:.:,:.:„:„0::::„„:::• �}� Is NI - / illtdai . 7 _EN 1 • :- " Fs- 4 R5E krife ._.,.,; .. - - ' � 64 ' • i' b. 4.::::::::::....:...::::>:;:::> ' 'k"fii".!:. giffigt:26 ...:::' :-:-E:-:...iL..-: ii'-1 g,t : ••',.,1mik . C L . ::,!=-:,.!!3,! -,,:„z:::.::: .::if,,,,:::,, :::,ii. ,,i,r,:,:,iy:•.!.!. y.,,,,,,.•1/4 izsyr =.-_73-, - .4,t, . i . 7 iiisiv:. L.1 ..ik' i 36 T24N R4E 31 T2AN R5E �_ • ►3 itht4 : t24N R5E `i1 IIIIIIIIII , \ 15-0MMWM6177111J . 0' llu i Ills .Tii. r• ;'itfl, (III(1 V ,,t -: ..-- _ III + -;.�. .. - NI . �- iL ?i. elh I' ^ � LT23N R5F• r t '•d 'L - 't WILMINIMI � iinligral Q, r*,-..-i ircia.4i3 7 3,71Vr&,pitilimilai . •,i., i •.6 ill .Ib .W. '�fSt.Nt. 4 2`7- 1 /I ` i.f- , .5; . 10_.I 1✓►f{S" 15 T 3 RSE i ,V' li -.. Ml ...I.. ._a. .4,21 ,. wip _ I. ._ .4,,., 2,14/ ------ '„.:Xl>0 , ''',.,. ,- 171910V-•,1, t -VW*kfifi . rill, "I iirpop ii410.-- wr- ' *.i-Xb --,:'...,.:4111:7,-.:„ ifitC-Arillk - %Pil."-- 71P,!• Pi ' "kis. , 3/111 \3 5�: II 13biliPl t all F#1 �� 371 : 6s ilk •T2 R -lL ' RAE IiC!i� � 1, ' T23:5 .rn"C 3N rka „4•22 723N R 23 T23N R5E e Milli 'Noc siretai e 01 . are ''' tsi •t:, a 821 --Lr: i l7 _i 1 T ,... ,,,_. 1' a qs frA I511 - 0I ' 825,W-4 prit, , >."3i 3N`R$ I. 1 - T21, R5E _ it A ., . .4. - !R5E ' 35 T23N -':l--- P.-- 11 't C,�PANT!!6F LI y % !.1• 1 ---- _ t �;,, rII ,I. * 41.: -- '- - . - --.:i: . 22N R4E 6 T2 SE 22ry I•SE y1 ` �' � 2 722N R5E q KROLL a. 1-1 Resource Conservation 1� Convenience Commeral 'P1 Publicly Owned Residential I du/ac n Center Neighborhood PAGE „vet ^- Renton City Limits # n iF n Residential 5 du/ac n Center Suburban _Adjacent City Limits nResidential B du/ac n Center Downtown i �--1(Grey Text) Prezonea SECT/TOWN/RANGE .� n Residential Manufactured Homes F 1 Center Office Residential Nig Automall District A an Residential 10 du/ac n Commercial Arterial 1•;•;•;1 Automall District B Ma Residential 14 du/ac .7;1 Commercial Arterial Automall PAGE • u a n Residential Multi-Family lainCommercial Office x CTI Residential Multi-Family Neighborhood Center n Industrial - Heavy INDEX W Q Residential Multi-Family Suburban Center ElIndustrial - Medium 'a N - 1-1 ResidanUal Multi-Family Urban Center 1-1 Industrial - Light on Public Use w - halm me Grt SI•RSIIL1 LEGAL mammas i mt m[ul•Pnnla, �� 10.aP'P.c ro'M4"'47.0 re Ma man W t.RIY[t5 Igl1�t.' RfOI.G N fNS.l.ltk t WM IOC fie_— AI orr Cr R,M m.R a NC SIMa • Plerrt RPS.011,MO,nr III Ile MI oP.a,I e.RN S.Sill.[• PEW 41Il�RRfl I lwPl•M.Sr OM MOW MIwar sar, t; I a,rRTOR'llRiu.r..r II 3 1 r. R.n mrsl.R�rP. r snl.nn,l�uaPlrtl•rul 5. i m"e.:KIP r e...,1,141.4601 P I.el•IH,IR 1 A _ •PE,`Iw6SS.ID,.[.;� R,14'4 .u:.-vlr.®.1r Y --- I #s# 'IIS IIII.IR RIW. I aro ems 31 OM.119..RIM -------- 1 N. o Pr..R R.. I. ,,,V,,I[••r4LX ,ec..lw f r 1 `R.41rt rt"el I:.'.rIPI.R rRR(PI alf I u.r+f r 1 If.I.IK.a.IM ali/RIIr.(.ARIAI4; r 101['II•III ;11.0�IIxIIIhr4 Slrtf IS RIPRI Ix NIPR 1 y f[If..Sr..I.RUIN..rP 1 C NO MNrt.IfP RIS Irt....lf S f RPIR., !r r3 r.Ple SOTS IM.I t St.RRU1 Cr St R MCA mt. I "ram Ic.P=6..n S r RIM.wsurt ViGINITY MAP 1 J.MR..INIPIIP IS SPIR.. _ 1..•RSrb.12 ; I COMM 0 1 IN \-- 1- . �� IOh i . : gill =�R l -T_ 'r A RR .ar m Y 1�— dP Pl Cl- _ t INKS w PROW.AP ND I0�� �\ > _ s1 % _ _= ,%sfi�Y %////y/% . 1=11s� %G Lilt=;' ";"'�',.� I i 6 R< I� P r _ .. a Jr _ .. `� 1 v � k v v v ye wv mw v v v k *Ilj_v - s I 1 �.•• ' y 11 I . Sel.II.RIaN i I pp1 iw�� e--T 1 �•1 �. 1`7 ! 1 i PROPOSED BUILDING FOOTPRMT: 95,152 F. ; 1 . aRe Nv �, qMEZZ 86,152•F. ....,.,., ,.. i t roR•e.a.... 711.71 wrwill 1O6,157•F. �'i' use,mn,elme,r roam c � ..I WOW WOaR IIIi .Iv. ! I W F +� oaQ * c.a e.a a a Q IY.ca•PI ,.� �� 1•IIVNzN»YNII ,! I a, CD • • 417."4 I Ii) r 1 Il�l]��r�a� J � I o 7 e:-; -- "11111i1556"11 47...trilli- Y' En IMEMLBONE .,. 1 wee i[1.RI II. I. __ _ L.Sy. -- • p. 4R•ly . I C3 LIND AYENIE I .[.r* — —e0R. .n[., — = v — — — �;:i:wn — p 4,'I z o • a� ° acic[.0 ` : _ LaoN.anNe NU Ca Z INI5 K� A mr•u / • 1 f.1 I •• / toe..v'.rw[•w..veo[uRS K , wa (n V _ 6 51TE PLAN �—dr A I i SD-1 .�r.� FR ; _ III` ;� ,I --I ' 10/19/99 08:45 ern C\CRD\9830G1ILF\SD-I a.9 ------------------------------------ a'rcawo■., , -• ' S!♦ eAl SSG l°A SSA 1� 556 1ro 555 556 5SG 3S6T `�� �•:' 0 Off�.•::�'l,��r.,-�'��`'.�, .1: .'c;{,Y!',�i ;:��t.=l7�,. O�`Orr , e-• �\ i \vim« \� '.w ��- i \%�. �. ��.\� Z --�_�-- . �y III' ry `\., 'A ••'O •e aOWCI.�°2O t°b�1"-(Tit.gr 4`!"'P��1°,,°afE1a"'!°e�oiF4:.74)�0°o°O°1"..h.f•-.,'�0°0 \-.1,° %%"'.., o°`0,0°1�•14r` ,.: ti.�°° ° ti,,'�O�r• k. %. •'. etM �R . ,\:P s , r �\A\\ j^i \\\ ',\•,!° �°••"• \\\� 'Q� \��,..Ag♦:♦ems.w �O�°• A"••� \` •�O� di?ill 11111 1 • ��:1�.\\\5. �','�\fie. �. .�A.Q As�tite ah`�•v.\C!c!..� fAb `h•M.�V` ����:►•. ♦ ♦:``�'v�P `\\ ♦A•••4•• �1, '•:,4 ••�R,4 s•tt.\\�A\l��\�,�l'\\\�.�`\•\`lam�/• I 114� nn l� ssv e1M 1rL 7G,� 1161- l'Y.� 7G ss� lIG 7G 1� nMA� 7G sv lrG 7G sFRI vn v 7 D� sld src 7G S� v!A ilk I _ 44 -,4:• �s. }q., ,rF x I ' Q �R ' .■-''�' PROPOSED BUILDING Q e 9g• R PROPOSED BUILDING 111111 ii :; 1R 1— I0Ri 1_:e rero --- --- ---- , ---- ---- sero I :::::1 ©iiinnuul,5 GE AOt 1� :; tiii 1-'...: eN�e06� 65J 6 1. 05 Saei 111Pi509�1 Ai5aBiser sae SW e06 sN 006 SOe SIT 600 SIP SG6 106 sN SaB SN ,,,� 5 } _Om !i22ft DG 7EA G 7 i qL' I,11J I--11,-,l l 1._> I I I l [lbl 11 �l T�l1f1Tl 1 1LI I I I S Q` 1 l�� l I �Q43 CO �;_ 1 7G 7G 7G / ..Ci.i II n 3de b G L!/ I ieP 1 ' �1// �fE' Qw s 1 r■ a ero � , * .-•.`+`O ' ' ,.a. -.* !d� 1,., Y- 's _ it& -.' I i" g . `-' '.. .y�Ri ��.c ` — b ,A f.r{ ■f f owl ! 1i1 v14 in k..•-. °. P`'f��i!, .''1 t I �� .rrr a1� �.� 6e� L® ���: � '&; �Ar '!P!' — �A- + 4� ..FBI-` '-' (®sue �. r�•s.= 0.. •r •. iMilin 11 Sji•01 Si!��)sf 1�}'S(®19M117i11 I"Na�a eel;fa omi/joy ' ogrA ,111fN�1 r SY���� ��`S l-J!■= .�+ e• ' � 11' - - - -- — —eAmwrais — C/� ' bEA 0 II 5CF Id \O O ♦.,, , I I L1 L�1 I .... . x 00l -� WY /• '- zJ oz '' Brumbaugh E.Associates 0.1 as landscape Architecture 1:, ,lilit4 "...".... PLAN • I; iet g0, 2 Y yX r s sa��a�x�aas o e O i .,,: g'' 'bis‘ ' H10 4 11 04111 111 " i I i 1 I WI i ilMillillh 11 ild i 1 1 q 555 P t 1 tril i 1 9 1 . Ilu=liuu E. Y e 1=Fffl _ • IIIlullllllll , c j c ay sa@•§"NYY F Y mo u"=°1mol°i t t a 4 5,A pF uiu1=� milluull- =111III-111NI i 1 seee ee e oomm m iAA MP Ilb; iy n tl nnhhn RP, hn I i i I P2.ips glA 1 0 5 Y ! 1• A. P. t., 4 q re i 1 1 0 ii! Ill 111 M 111; 1 h 21 g lei lit M 11 ii o MEM _ M 1 i ` = � t ; m ► S1 2 o Opt_ r -U * a i III I 41!; iliq 5 4 ni 140 s� .tr <i� S 111 elf* PNONE (206) 433-8997 m G1[ o6tllno• ""CTPACIFIC GULF PROPERTIES •7`"% 206> 246-6369 «n,... N in a LIND AVE. AND SW 39TH ST. oat fiM P. a RENTON, WASHINGTON 12720 GATEWAY DRI1E SUITE 116M eV,.. 9EA7LE,IWASH4NGTGIN I DM 7IS,yA PAWED R.AI PAWED TLT4P CQlOE1E of EALA ___. ,. I I II II II I I II II I I 4, -I R .. ___...i m R-IIIm �i®I � A € z L . 611CCO 6QFlT NO AWNM LOCOS6 ACCEW BAD ERNE(CLEAR)W WEST ELEVATION SOUTH HALF rm.r-wCONCRETE W r GLAIR! ligh SCALE W•r-O LAMCAPE IfENI 1 PAIRED TU- _ _ PAIRED TILTW CONCRETE REVEAL—\ ,}� 1 i.I 0 11 U 1 I I I 1 U U 0 1 INi�l ll 0 L6'�ll=SOEII ALIPNNSMCIY ® ® ��d��I�O�I 1 Aup(r B V ERNE(CLE W W E k BRI NE ClA60 TILT -PEES W ATED LEST ELEVATION NORTH HALF 1 PANTED FLAYING SCA F 6'. O' PANTED RASUSY lg� W[PANTED TILT UPCONCRETE i PREANWEDVEAL TILT-LP COCiE1E a 'EVEN A. -- X. 4. ii.-- jI-..�P �, _ �� a ACCENT 5ATO _ IL 6nccoo Oar NO ii b ERNE(CLEAR/ RUM(CLM.Ili 0 •TET.LP CONCRETE W ORME M NSULATED -T6 CONCRETE W LA DEW G COL NORTH ELEVATION LNAICAPE°Qf SOUTH ELEVATION T mDO"RaooONP,W, U)I�; SCALE:NS'•r-o WALE:NV•r4 SO(N W 1 PANTED R.NNN' LOP LOi10 [PAINTED COCIETE LM.1 L li O T'DDlE E9d;E BND(RODDd PdW) IEVFAL� Fill PALACE ELSE /� r..:!..• O LONER 6ND(ICOD4 PANT) O •W(N ROCK RIVER //yy'.X li Op ACCENT BAN,(rELLT-MOO E) J—_ !I j TAL30.N O RO>mIRT 4-1' EAST ELEVATION NORTH HALF � Ca SCALE V6'.1'0' PANTED EL0.5uEG v Qrn / 1-PAINTED TILT-LP CeNCRFTE r RiVE.YA fir--I_ 5 d zw .i a., a rz EAST ELEVATION SOUTH HALF EL- ENLARGE w TQ.., Wow, Q P r rr , r ,yr '� ^L_ I 1 /7-' _ a--Q 7i -t= , - 1 I IS9 .AP I i ' ' p I I I � � 4 i V .-} -V 1 I i 0 wr 0- •— ° 11 I I i ► 1 I I )1 if:II I 1 1 4 g Ft .. - � I I I �i k r ' r A § i Ifi r i i , I� i _ 'I ► - - s : R ; .; F; - 1 II I 4ir � —y�� i,i 4 , � p I I I I ,ii n ° f 1 rC (3- •-,74---Tr a 1 i .G I I i i „ 0, I I 4 - I If F• 6--- M —�-U ' 4 ! I I I i , i .... iii f tr.. r / i o- ' ' I .,- o i I i i s - - ' !I- 1 ....._0 i _ 1 , � ii ki, i 4 ® • i-. ---- u —N^4 ,I II 111.�.r � sa' � it � rr ' O n O ► ( ) 433-ee97 m MILurvc�rrw Para �3m PACIFIC GULF PROPERTIES • rm.,. p LIND AVE. AND SW 39TH ST. _"°"" O1 ' — z RENTON, WASHINGTON 12720 u11110ME va 1101. - —.........DAM tgEATIILE. wASINGt e .OM mn"PA •• CITY )F RENTON -ILt % Planning/Building/Public Works Department 7 e Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator January 4, 2000 Mr. Barton Treece, Jr. Treece & Company, Inc. 320 Second Avenue South Kirkland, WA 98033 SUBJECT: Pacific Gulf Properties LUA99-105,SA-H,ECF Dear Mr. Treece: This letter is to inform you that the comment and appeal periods have ended for the Environmental Review Committee's (ERC) Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the above-referenced project. No appeals were filed on the ERC determination. The applicant must comply with all ERC Mitigation Measures. As you have already been advised, a Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton,Washington, on January 11, 2000 at 9:00 AM to consider the Site Plan Approval. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at(425)430-7219. For the Environmental Review Committee, e&E, Peter Rosen Project Manager cc: Powell-Orillia LLC/Owners FINAL 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 •$ CITY _IF RENTON ..LL Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator December 16, 1999 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Subject: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC)on December 14, 1999: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED PACIFIC GULF PROPERTIES LUA-99-105,SA-H,ECF Proposal to construct a 106,752 sq. ft. warehouse/office building. The building footprint would be approximately 98,752 sq. ft. with an additional 8,000 sq.ft. of mezzanine. The front of the building facing Lind Ave. SW would have four recessed areas of loading docks and glass-front office entries. The back of the building would have on- grade loading access. Access is proposed via three (3)drives off Lind Ave. SW. The north access is an existing driveway to be used in common with Farwest Steel and the south access is the existing back exit for the Act III Theaters. The proposal would construct one additional driveway cut in the center of the site frontage. The site plan includes 234 parking spaces. A wetland area that was created for mitigation for the Home Base and Act III Theater projects is located on the east part of the site. The proposal maintains a 25-foot undisturbed buffer width from the wetland edge. Location: 3600 &3800 Lind Avenue SW. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM January 3, 2000. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8- 11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430- 6510. If you have questions, please call me at(425)430-7219. For the Environmental Review Committee, 6)&graeN, Peter Rosen Project Manager cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division Larry Fisher, Department of Fisheries David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources Don Hurter, Department of Transportation Shirley Lukhang, Seattle Public Utilities Duwamish Tribal Office Rod Malcom, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (Ordinance) Joe Jainga, Puget Sound Energy agencyltr\ 1055 South!�� Grady Way-Renton, Washington 98055 Gam)This naner contains SOW recvcled material 90%nest consumer CITY F RENTON ..LL Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator December 16, 1999 Mr. Barton Treece, Jr. Treece &Company, Inc. 320 Second Avenue South Kirkland, WA 98033 SUBJECT: Pacific Gulf Properties LUA99-105,SA-H,ECF Dear Mr.Treece: This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) and is to advise you that they have completed their review of the subject project. The ERC, on December 14, 1999, issued a threshold Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated with Mitigation Measures. See the enclosed Mitigation Measures document. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM January 3, 2000. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8- 11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430- 6510. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, Washington, on January 11, 2000 at 9:00 AM to consider the Site Plan Approval. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you one week before the hearing. If the Environmental Determination is appealed, the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. The preceding information will assist you in planning for implementation of your project and enable you to exercise your appeal rights more fully, if you choose to do so. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at(425)430-7219. For the Environmental Review Committee, 41. Peter Rosen Project Manager cc: Powell-Orillia LLC/Owners Enclosure dnsmletter 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 This paper contains 50%recycled material.20%post consumer CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-99-105,SA-H,ECF APPLICANT: Barton Treece PROJECT NAME: Pacific Gulf Properties DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construct a 106,752 sq. ft. warehouse/office building. The building footprint would be approximately 98,752 sq. ft. with an additional 8,000 sq. ft. of mezzanine. The front of the building facing Lind Ave. SW would have four recessed areas of loading docks and glass- front office entries. The back of the building would have on-grade loading access. Access is proposed via three (3) drives off Lind Ave. SW. The north access is an existing driveway to be used in common with Farwest Steel and the south access is the existing back exit for the Act III Theaters. The proposal would construct one additional driveway cut in the center of the site frontage. The site plan includes 234 parking spaces. A wetland area that was created for mitigation for the Home Base and Act III Theater projects is located on the east part of the site. The proposal maintains a 25-foot undisturbed buffer width from the wetland edge. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 3600&3800 Lind Avenue SW MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of $0.52 per square foot of new construction. This fee is estimated at $55,511.04. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 2. The applicant shall record a restrictive covenant on the property stating that tenant parking needs shall be analyzed prior to building permit issuance, including tenant improvements. If the ultimate user of the property exceeds the number of employees from what is expected for a typical warehouse/distribution use or is a fleet-based user with higher parking demands, then further environmental review and additional parking may be required prior to issuance of a building permit and/or business license. The restrictive covenant shall be submitted to the Development Services Division and approved by the City Attorney prior to recording. The restrictive covenant shall be recorded prior to issuance of building permits. 3. The applicant shall be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of $75 for each average daily trip associated with the project. The Traffic Mitigation Fee is estimated at $63,750. This fee is payable prior to issuance of Building Permits. CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES • APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-99-105,SA-H,ECF APPLICANT: Barton Treece PROJECT NAME: Pacific Gulf Properties DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construct a 106,752 sq. ft. warehouse/office building. The building footprint would be approximately 98,752 sq. ft. with an additional 8,000 sq. ft. of mezzanine. The front of the building facing Lind Ave. SW would have four recessed areas of loading docks and glass- front office entries. The back of the building would have on-grade loading access. Access is proposed via three (3) drives off Lind Ave. SW. The north access is an existing driveway to be used in common with Farwest Steel and the south access is the existing back exit for the Act III Theaters. The proposal would construct one additional driveway cut in the center of the site frontage. The site plan includes 234 parking spaces. A wetland area that was created for mitigation for the Home Base and Act III Theater projects is located on the east part of the site. The proposal maintains a 25-foot undisturbed buffer width from the wetland edge. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 3600 & 3800 Lind Avenue SW Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. BUILDING Compliance with 1997 editions of Uniform Codes and 1999 NEC. FIRE 1. The preliminary fire flow is 4000 GPM, which requires one hydrant within 150 feet of the building and three additional hydrants within 300 feet of the building. A looped water main is required. 2. Separate plans and permits are required for the installation of required fire alarm and sprinkler systems. 3. Provide a list of any flammable, combustible liquids or hazardous chemicals that are to be used or stored on site. PLAN REVIEW Water 1. The Water System Development Connection Charge is $0.113 per gross square foot of site area, but not less than $850. 2. A vertical profile will be required showing the water system. 3. Station numbers to be shown on the loop water line. Also, show station number and off-set for water valves. 4. Two (2) additional valves will be required on the loop water main that extends to the three (3) proposed fire hydrants. 5. Maintain a minimum 7.5-foot separation from the storm line at the south end of the project. 6. A 5-inch storz adapter will be required on all new or existing hydrants used to meet the required fire flow standards. 7. Domestic and irrigation meter size and location to be shown. Also show size and location of the sprinkler system with the backflow prevention device. 8. Drawings to meet City of Renton drafting standards. Pacific Gulf Properties LUA-99-105,SA-H,ECF Advisory Notes (continued) Page 2 of 2 9. Looped water main to be in a 15-foot utility easement. Storm/Surface Water 1. The Storm System Development Connection Charge is $0.129 per square foot of new impervious surface area, but not less than $385. Show on plan the amount of new impervious surface area and the square feet of wetlands on the site. 2. Construction plans to use NAVD 1988 datum for elevations. 1. The design of the detention pond must demonstrate adequacy for detention, water quality and conveyance capacity. 2. Show vertical profile of storm line on construction plans. 3. Drawings need to show where water will drain to at the north end of the building. 4. The project is required to meet King County 1990 Surface Water Design manual requirements. The Preliminary Drainage Report appears to be acceptable. Wastewater 1. The Sewer System Development Connection Charge is $0.078 per gross square feet of site area, but not less than $850. Show total square feet of site area and show area of any wetlands on site. 2. A clean-out is required 5-feet out from the building. 3. If the project produce fats, oil, or grease, then an appropriate removal system will be required per plumbing code. 4. A backflow prevention device is required on the sewer line if the floor elevation is below 25-feet. Show the floor elevation on the plans. 5. Sewer line to have a 2% slope to property line. 6. Show vertical clearances over or under existing 16-inch water main. 7. Drawings to meet City of Renton drafting standards. 8. A vertical profile will be required. Transportation 1. A six (6) foot sidewalk is required to be located on Lind Avenue SW with the back edge of the sidewalk located at the property line and a minimum 6-foot planter strip located between the curb and sidewalk. 2. Driveway entrance at the south end and front of the building to be located a distance of 50 feet from the curb line of Lind Avenue SW. PLANNING 1. Garbage and recyclable deposit areas and collection points shall be easily and safely accessible to hauling trucks. POLICE Theft from construction sites is one of the most common reported crimes in the City. To protect materials and equipment it is recommended that all materials and tools be locked up when not in use. The site will need security lighting and any construction trailer should be completely fenced in with portable chain-link fencing. The fence will provide both a physical and psychological barrier to any prospective thief and will demonstrate that this area is private property. Construction trailers should be kept locked when not in use, and should also have a heavy-duty deadbolt installed with no less than a 1 1/2 inch throw when bolted. Glass windows in the trailer should be shatter-resistant. I also recommend the business post the appropriate"No Trespassing"signs on the property while it's under construction. This will aid police in making arrests on the property after hours if suspects are observed vandalizing or stealing building materials. • NooncE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: PACIFIC GULF PROPERTIES PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-99-105,SA-H,ECF Proposal to construct a 106,752 sq. ft. warehouse/office building. The building footprint would be approximately 98,752 sq.ft.with an additional 8,000 sq.ft.of mezzanine. The front of the building facing Lind Ave.SW would have four recessed areas of loading docks and glass-front office entries. The back of the building would have on-grade loading access. Access is proposed via three(3)drives off Lind Ave. SW. The north access is an existing driveway to be used in common with Farwest Steel and the south access is the existing back exit for the Act Ill Theaters. The proposal would construct one additional driveway cut in the center of the site frontage. The site plan includes 234 parking spaces. A wetland area that was created for mitigation for the Home Base and Act Ill Theater projects is located on the east part of the site. The proposal maintains a 25-foot undisturbed buffer width from the wetland edge. Location:3600&3800 Lind Avenue SW. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM January 3, 2000. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required$75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner,City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office,(425)-430-6510. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the 7th floor of City Hall,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,Washington,on January 11,2000 at 9:00 AM to consider the Site Plan Approval. If the Environmental Determination is appealed,the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. 1 _I` #*� < • ilit . III 1 II ilk tP1 l■ ) , p liari:,,) i " iillo- // 4,, 1))_cA/A____,,n,J_ mp724-.9•_=1-1:11,i-1--5„.9-..,J i ,' ine ____ ..._.. Iti ' , ilmsm. . j1. ' o am ..... iAll mom Agi I . nY' NEICsMBOR11000 DETAIL MAP-• .....•....+....•. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT(425)430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-99-105,SA-H,ECF APPLICANT: Barton Treece PROJECT NAME: Pacific Gulf Properties DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construct a 106,752 sq. ft. warehouse/office building. The building footprint would be approximately 98,752 sq. ft. with an additional 8,000 sq. ft. of mezzanine. The front of the building facing Lind Ave. SW would have four recessed areas of loading docks and glass-front office entries. The back of the building would have on-grade loading access. Access is proposed via three (3) drives off Lind Ave. SW. The north access is an existing driveway to be used in common with Farwest Steel and the south access is the existing back exit for the Act III Theaters. The proposal would construct one additional driveway cut in the center of the site frontage. The site plan includes 234 parking spaces. A wetland area that was created for mitigation for the Home Base and Act III Theater projects is located on the east part of the site. The proposal maintains a 25-foot undisturbed buffer width from the wetland edge. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 3600 &3800 Lind Avenue SW LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM January 3, 2000. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: December 20, 1999 DATE OF DECISION: December 14, 1999 SIGNATURES: _1AL_ Gr imm rman, Administrato DAT Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Jtm a herd dmini rator DATE P � Community Services • Lee W r, Fire Chief DATE Renton Fire Department dnsmsig CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-99-105,SA-H,ECF APPLICANT: Barton Treece PROJECT NAME: Pacific Gulf Properties DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construct a 106,752 sq. ft. warehouse/office building. The building footprint would be approximately 98,752 sq. ft. with an additional 8,000 sq. ft. of mezzanine. The front of the building facing Lind Ave. SW would have four recessed areas of loading docks and glass- front office entries. The back of the building would have on-grade loading access. Access is proposed via three (3) drives off Lind Ave. SW. The north access is an existing driveway to be used in common with Farwest Steel and the south access is the existing back exit for the Act III Theaters. The proposal would construct one additional driveway cut in the center of the site frontage. The site plan includes 234 parking spaces. A wetland area that was created for mitigation for the Home Base and Act III Theater projects is located on the east part of the site. The proposal maintains a 25-foot undisturbed buffer width from the wetland edge. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 3600 & 3800 Lind Avenue SW MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of $0.52 per square foot of new construction. This fee is estimated at $55,511.04. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 2. The applicant shall record a restrictive covenant on the property stating that tenant parking needs shall be analyzed prior to building permit issuance, including tenant improvements. If the ultimate user of the property exceeds the number of employees from what is expected for a typical warehouse/distribution use or is a fleet-based user with higher parking demands, then further environmental review and additional parking may be required prior to issuance of a building permit and/or business license. The restrictive covenant shall be submitted to the Development Services Division and approved by the City Attorney prior to recording. The restrictive covenant shall be recorded prior to issuance of building permits. 3. The applicant shall be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of $75 for each average daily trip associated with the project. The Traffic Mitigation Fee is estimated at $63,750. This fee is payable prior to issuance of Building Permits. CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES • APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-99-105,SA-H,ECF APPLICANT: Barton Treece PROJECT NAME: Pacific Gulf Properties DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construct a 106,752 sq. ft. warehouse/office building. The building footprint would be approximately 98,752 sq. ft. with an additional 8,000 sq. ft. of mezzanine. The front of the building facing Lind Ave. SW would have four recessed areas of loading docks and glass- front office entries. The back of the building would have on-grade loading access. Access is proposed via three (3) drives off Lind Ave. SW. The north access is an existing driveway to be used in common with Farwest Steel and the south access is the existing back exit for the Act III Theaters. The proposal would construct one additional driveway cut in the center of the site frontage. The site plan includes 234 parking spaces. A wetland area that was created for mitigation for the Home Base and Act III Theater projects is located on the east part of the site. The proposal maintains a 25-foot undisturbed buffer width from the wetland edge. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 3600 &3800 Lind Avenue SW Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. BUILDING Compliance with 1997 editions of Uniform Codes and 1999 NEC. FIRE 1. The preliminary fire flow is 4000 GPM, which requires one hydrant within 150 feet of the building and three additional hydrants within 300 feet of the building. A looped water main is required. 2. Separate plans and permits are required for the installation of required fire alarm and sprinkler systems. 3. Provide a list of any flammable, combustible liquids or hazardous chemicals that are to be used or stored on site. PLAN REVIEW Water 1. The Water System Development Connection Charge is $0.113 per gross square foot of site area, but not less than $850. 2. A vertical profile will be required showing the water system. 3. Station numbers to be shown on the loop water line. Also, show station number and off-set for water valves. 4. Two (2) additional valves will be required on the loop water main that extends to the three (3) proposed fire hydrants. 5. Maintain a minimum 7.5-foot separation from the storm line at the south end of the project. 6. A 5-inch storz adapter will be required on all new or existing hydrants used to meet the required fire flow standards. 7. Domestic and irrigation meter size and location to be shown. Also show size and location of the sprinkler system with the backflow prevention device. 8. Drawings to meet City of Renton drafting standards. • Pacific Gulf Properties LUA-99-105,SA-H,ECF Advisory Notes (continued) Page 2 of 2 9. Looped water main to be in a 15-foot utility easement. Storm/Surface Water 1. The Storm System Development Connection Charge is $0.129 per square foot of new impervious surface area, but not less than $385. Show on plan the amount of new impervious surface area and the square feet of wetlands on the site. 2. Construction plans to use NAVD 1988 datum for elevations. 1. The design of the detention pond must demonstrate adequacy for detention, water quality and conveyance capacity. 2. Show vertical profile of storm line on construction plans. 3. Drawings need to show where water will drain to at the north end of the building. 4. The project is required to meet King County 1990 Surface Water Design manual requirements. The Preliminary Drainage Report appears to be acceptable. Wastewater 1. The Sewer System Development Connection Charge is $0.078 per gross square feet of site area, but not less than $850. Show total square feet of site area and show area of any wetlands on site. 2. A clean-out is required 5-feet out from the building. 3. If the project produce fats, oil, or grease, then an appropriate removal system will be required per plumbing code. 4. A backflow prevention device is required on the sewer line if the floor elevation is below 25-feet. Show the floor elevation on the plans. 5. Sewer line to have a 2% slope to property line. 6. Show vertical clearances over or under existing 16-inch water main. 7. Drawings to meet City of Renton drafting standards. 8. A vertical profile will be required. Transportation 1. A six (6) foot sidewalk is required to be located on Lind Avenue SW with the back edge of the sidewalk located at the property line and a minimum 6-foot planter strip located between the curb and sidewalk. 2. Driveway entrance at the south end and front of the building to be located a distance of 50 feet from the curb line of Lind Avenue SW. PLANNING 1. Garbage and recyclable deposit areas and collection points shall be easily and safely accessible to hauling trucks. POLICE Theft from construction sites is one of the most common reported crimes in the City. To protect materials and equipment it is recommended that all materials and tools be locked up when not in use. The site will need security lighting and any construction trailer should be completely fenced in with portable chain-link fencing. The fence will provide both a physical and psychological barrier to any prospective thief and will demonstrate that this area is private property. Construction trailers should be kept locked when not in use, and should also have a heavy-duty deadbolt installed with no less than a 1 '/2 inch throw when bolted. Glass windows in the trailer should be shatter-resistant. I also recommend the business post the appropriate"No Trespassing"signs on the property while it's under construction. This will aid police in making arrests on the property after hours if suspects are observed vandalizing or stealing building materials. NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. PACIFIC GULF PROPERTIES LUA-99-105,SA-H,ECF Proposal to construct a warehouse and office building. Location: 3600 & 3800 Lind Ave. SW. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM January 3, 2000. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of City Hall, January 11, 2000 at 9:00 AM to consider the site plan approval. If the Environmental Determination is appealed, the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. Interested parties are invited to attend the public hearing. Publication Date: December 20, 1999 Account No. 51067 dnsmpub.dot STAFF City of Renton REPORT Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE A. BACKGROUND ERC MEETING DATE: December 14, 1999 Project Name: Pacific Gulf Properties Applicant: Barton Treece File Number: LUA-99-105, SA-H, ECF Project Manager: Peter Rosen Project Description: Proposal to construct a 106,752 sq. ft. warehouse/office building. The building footprint would be approximately 98,752 sq. ft. with an additional 8,000 sq. ft. of mezzanine. The front of the building facing Lind Ave. SW would have four recessed areas of loading docks and glass-front office entries. The back of the building would have on-grade loading access. There are no specific tenants or uses at this time but warehousing, office and light industrial uses are anticipated. Access is proposed via three (3) drives off Lind Ave. SW. The north access is an existing driveway to be used in common with Farwest Steel and the south access is the existing back exit for the Act Ill Theaters. The proposal would construct one additional driveway cut in the center of the site frontage. The site plan includes 210 parking spaces. A wetland area that was created for mitigation for the Home Base and Act Ill Theater projects is located on the east part of the site. The proposal maintains a 25-foot undisturbed buffer width from the wetland edge. Project Location: 3600 & 3800 Lind Avenue SW Exist. Bldg. Area gsf Undeveloped Proposed New Bldg. Area gsf 106,752 sq. ft. Site Area 7.39 acres Total Building Area gsf 106,752 sq. ft. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Non-Significance, Mitigated(DNS, M) - I��. � T 4111 I 1-13_ J! OM*,_ __3 aii, _ � - -'1 4 t== Project Location Map p1 STAFFREPORT City of Renton P/B/PW Department Environment ?view Committee Staff Report PACIFIC GULF PROPERTIES LUA-99-105, SA-H,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF DECEMBER 14, 1999 Page 2 of 6 B. RECOMMENDATION Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINATION OF DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED. Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. X Issue DNS-M with 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period followed by a 14 day Appeal Period. C. MITIGATION MEASURES 1. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of $0.52 per square foot of new construction. This fee is estimated at $55,511.04. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of Building Permits. J 2. The applicant shall record a restrictive covenant on the property stating that tenant parking needs shall be analyzed prior to building permit issuance, including tenant improvements. If the ultimate user of the property exceeds the number of employees from what is expected for a typical warehouse/distribution use or is a fleet- based user with higher parking demands, then further environmental review and additional parking may be required prior to issuance of a building permit and/or business license. The restrictive covenant shall be submitted to the Development Services Division and approved by the City Attorney prior to recording. The restrictive covenant shall be recorded prior to issuance of building permits. 3. The applicant shall be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of $75 for each average daily trip associated with the project. The Traffic Mitigation Fee is estimated at $63,750. This fee is payable prior to issuance of Building Permits. STAFFREPORT City of Renton P/B/PW Department Environment wiew Committee Staff Report PACIFIC GULF PROPERTIES LUA-99-105, SA-H, ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF DECEMBER 14, 1999 Page 3 of 6 Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. BUILDING Compliance with 1997 editions of Uniform Codes and 1999 NEC. FIRE 1. The preliminary fire flow is 4000 GPM, which requires one hydrant within 150 feet of the building and three additional hydrants within 300 feet of the building. A looped water main is required. 2. Separate plans and permits are required for the installation of required fire alarm and sprinkler systems. 3. Provide a list of any flammable, combustible liquids or hazardous chemicals that are to be used or stored on site. PLAN REVIEW Water 1. The Water System Development Connection Charge is $0.113 per gross square foot of site area, but not less than $850. 2. A vertical profile will be required showing the water system. 3. Station numbers to be shown on the loop water line. Also, show station number and off-set for water valves. 4. Two (2) additional valves will be required on the loop water main that extends to the three (3) proposed fire hydrants. 5. Maintain a minimum 7.5-foot separation from the storm line at the south end of the project. 6. A 5-inch storz adapter will be required on all new or existing hydrants used to meet the required fire flow standards. 7. Domestic and irrigation meter size and location to be shown. Also show size and location of the sprinkler system with the backflow prevention device. 8. Drawings to meet City of Renton drafting standards. 9. Looped water main to be in a 15-foot utility easement. Storm/Surface Water 1. The Storm System Development Connection Charge is $0.129 per square foot of new impervious surface area, but not less than $385. Show on plan the amount of new impervious surface area and the square feet of wetlands on the site. 2. Construction plans to use NAVD 1988 datum for elevations. 1. The design of the detention pond must demonstrate adequacy for detention, water quality and conveyance capacity. 2. Show vertical profile of storm line on construction plans. 3. Drawings need to show where water will drain to at the north end of the building. 4. The project is required to meet King County 1990 Surface Water Design manual requirements. The Preliminary Drainage Report appears to be acceptable. Wastewater 1. The Sewer System Development Connection Charge is $0.078 per gross square feet of site area, but not less than $850. Show total square feet of site area and show area of any wetlands on site. 2. A clean-out is required 5-feet out from the building. 3. If the project produce fats, oil, or grease, then an appropriate removal system will be required per plumbing code. 4. A backflow prevention device is required on the sewer line if the floor elevation is below 25-feet. Show the floor elevation on the plans. 5. Sewer line to have a 2% slope to property line. 6. Show vertical clearances over or under existing 16-inch water main. STAFFREPORT City of Renton P/B/PW Department Environmen1 view Committee Staff Report PACIFIC GULF PROPERTIES LUA-99-105, SA-H,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF DECEMBER 14, 1999 Page 4 of 6 7. Drawings to meet City of Renton drafting standards. 8. A vertical profile will be required. Transportation 1. A six (6) foot sidewalk is required to be located on Lind Avenue SW with the back edge of the sidewalk located at the property line and a minimum 6-foot planter strip located between the curb and sidewalk. 2. Driveway entrance at the south end and front of the building to be located a distance of 50 feet from the curb line of Lind Avenue SW. PLANNING 1. Garbage and recyclable deposit areas and collection points shall be easily and safely accessible to hauling trucks. POLICE Theft from construction sites is one of the most common reported crimes in the City. To protect materials and equipment it is recommended that all materials and tools be locked up when not in use. The site will need security lighting and any construction trailer should be completely fenced in with portable chain-link fencing. The fence will provide both a physical and psychological barrier to any prospective thief and will demonstrate that this area is private property. Construction trailers should be kept locked when not in use, and should also have a heavy-duty deadbolt installed with no less than a 1 1/2 inch throw when bolted. Glass windows in the trailer should be shatter-resistant. I also recommend the business post the appropriate "No Trespassing" signs on the property while it's under construction. This will aid police in making arrests on the property after hours if suspects are observed vandalizing or stealing building materials. D. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS In compliance with RCW 43.21 C. 240, the following project environmental review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. Has the applicant adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed development? 1. Earth Impacts: The project site is basically flat and cleared of primary vegetation. Fill has been previously placed over a small area in the northern part of the site. The fill thickness ranges to a maximum of two feet. A geotechnical report for the subject site has been prepared by Terra Associates, Inc. The report states that the primary geotechnical design concern is the presence of a 2.5 to 5.0 foot thick layer of compressible soft clay and organic silt. Compression of this layer under the proposed fill and building loads could result in unacceptable levels of building settlement. Therefore, the report recommends surcharging the site with a fill pad placed at least three feet higher than the final building pad elevation. With the surcharge, the building may utilize conventional spread footing foundations and slab-on-grade floors constructed on the existing medium dense to dense fills. The applicant estimates 25,000 cubic yards of fill material would be imported to the site from local borrow pits. Potential erosion impacts that could occur during construction would be mitigated by City Code requirements for a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) and Construction Mitigation Plan, approved prior to issuance of Construction Permits. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are recommended. Nexus: Not applicable. STAFFREPORT City of Renton P/B/PW Department Environmen eview Committee Staff Report PACIFIC GULF PROPERTIES LUA-99-105, SA-H,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF DECEMBER 14, 1999 Page 5 of 6 2. Water Impacts: The east boundary of the site includes a portion of a wetland area that continues off-site to the east. This wetland was created as compensatory mitigation for the Home Base and Act Ill Theater projects located to the east of the subject property. City wetland regulations state that wetlands created or restored as a part of a mitigation project are considered regulated wetlands. The edge of the wetland has been delineated by B-twelve Associates and then surveyed. The proposal would not impact the wetland and the site plan includes a 25-foot wide buffer from the delineated edge of the wetland. The created wetland replaced a Category 3 wetland. Category 3 wetlands require a minimum 25-foot wide buffer. The site plan complies with City wetland regulations. On-site drainage would be divided into two hydrologic basins. Runoff from the southern basin (Basin 'A')would be routed into a combination detention/wet pond located in the southeast corner of the site. Runoff from Basin 'B' in the north portion of the site would be conveyed to a combination detention/wet vault located in the northwest corner of the site. The stormwater facilities will be required to meet the design standards of the 1990 King County Stormwater Design Manual as adopted by the City. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are recommended. Nexus: Not applicable. 3. Fire Protection Impacts: The proposal would add new construction to the City, which would potentially impact the City's Fire Department. A Fire Mitigation Fee applies to all new construction. The required mitigation fee is based on a rate of $0.52 per square foot of new construction. For the proposed development the fee is estimated at $55,511.04 (106,752 square feet X $0.52 = $55,511.04). The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable at the time that building permits are issued. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of$0.52 per square foot of new construction. This fee is estimated at $55,511.04. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Policy Nexus: Fire Mitigation Fee Resolution and adopting Ordinance, SEPA 4. Transportation Impacts: Access to the site is proposed via three (3) drives off Lind Ave. SW. The north access is an existing driveway to be used in common with Farwest Steel and the south access is the existing back exit drive for the Act Ill Theaters. The proposal would construct one additional driveway cut in the center of the site frontage. The site plan includes 210 parking spaces which meets parking code requirements for the office/warehouse facility. The parking requirements are based on an anticipated mix of 40% office, 30% warehouse, and 30% manufacturing use. This mix of uses would require a minimum of 181 parking spaces and a maximum of 261. There is concern that parking requirements are difficult to assess with a speculative project. Future tenants may generate a need for parking that cannot be anticipated at this time. Therefore, staff recommends a condition that tenant parking needs be analyzed prior to building permit issuance, including tenant improvements. If the ultimate user of the property exceeds the number of employees from what is expected for a typical warehouse/distribution use or is a fleet-based user with higher parking demands, then further environmental review and additional parking may be required prior to issuance of a building permit and/or business license. The proposal would result in an increase in traffic trips and therefore would be subject to the City's Transportation Mitigation Fee. The Transportation Mitigation Fee is calculated to be $75 per each average daily trip attributable to the project. The Transpo Group prepared a traffic analysis to estimate trip generation for the proposal. The trip generation rates are based upon the ITE Manual. Staff concurs with Transpo's estimate that the proposal would result in 850 new average daily weekday trips. The traffic mitigation fee is estimated to be $63,750 (850 trips X $75/trip = $63,750). The applicant estimates 25,000 cubic yards of fill material would be imported for pre-loading the site. This would result in 1,250 to 2,500 truck trips depending on the combination of truck trailers utilized. The applicant has submitted a Construction Mitigation Plan which describes hauling and transportation routes to the site. The STAFFREPORT City of Renton P/B/PW Department Environmen eview Committee Staff Report PACIFIC GULF PROPERTIES LUA-99-105, SA-H, ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF DECEMBER 14, 1999 Page 6 of 6 Construction Mitigation Plan states that construction would be performed between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m., six days per week. In order to limit the impact of trucking activities during peak traffic periods, truck hauling hours are limited to between 8:30 a.m. and 3:30 p.m. under the Development Guidelines Ordinance. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall record a restrictive covenant on the property stating that tenant parking needs shall be analyzed prior to building permit issuance, including tenant improvements. If the ultimate user of the property exceeds the number of employees from what is expected for a typical warehouse/distribution use or is a fleet-based user with higher parking demands, then further environmental review and additional parking may be required prior to issuance of a building permit and/or business license. The restrictive covenant shall be submitted to the Development Services Division and approved by the City Attorney prior to recording. The restrictive covenant shall be recorded prior to issuance of building permits. The applicant shall be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of $75 for each average daily trip associated with the project. The Traffic Mitigation Fee is estimated at $63,750. This fee is payable prior to issuance of Building Permits. E. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS The proposal has been circulated to City Departmental/Divisional Reviewers for their review. Where applicable, these comments have been incorporated into the text of this report as Mitigation Measures and/or Notes to Applicant. X Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. Environmental Determination Appeal Process Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM January 3, 2000. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. STAFFREPORT 0 . •: 1s .2gm 0 i At , I 1 i A 1 li TIN 1 : . ill m mama %VIII . ‘• "I g 4 r . — • • , / . t II 3._Ullf 1 . 4R)IlEnTir j 1 i •''.7) j ---J 1:1 I-I 1----1 i i 1/ 41 :,, • ,j„. 1 ' 1111111a1M • ,,i, mr i im asnwi wr ,.. ,--w asmigg of./ Illip anamen 1 es. e, F , „ ..4.‘ IN egg . .;'. • • .......4 T. hu. 1011 -----• 1 ": / 5 o 1111 Illg , g. F. tgri -i 9. 79.1ST. \ f'' k. .'0 Itri 1 P----.1, Milk 1 4 SM.•1ST ST 12 r _ , 6 lo I 1 c:3 0 ... .ST ---..rj /4-1r 411 T. Ns r Al...7111 r 6 & AMIE a.„41i .• / 7 .; mAirAAm gm , 11 r 1 milimii, .. NEIGHBORHOOD DETAIL MAP •••• PACIFIC GULF PROPERTIES MIIIIIIMMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIINNEmommimi .,„BM.31..1.IIS11f• is .F DES, 1 IOILIIw�I.[f ` SOU MI KOWM MOl 190.wC O.rc i YI,1.�Klia�MKS•IK. KCO.K w w K1,,On2•taM1.2.' �T9P; S•1K.5[KI KWIKKaS•a.1.21'.l.Oa 101 KM.36, KS.. MK 9 S1K IOC m.111 V K1.I.a A*1 i 61 SANK AK. f K.H St Oa COS.a VIAL SITE, r - n, 11.Sr7.I.Of C31411K11311 VS Ya r .uK SKS1 KISS 1-OfO1.1I 4.3.111 Mr 4.2.rK.y p� PAS. Of ISL LINO. •s/Io11.K IAA/ IH/IF •y/� 1.1i�OK.•wKKl..1, War IA/,aa1111..11llal lOif.111S Lj . ' {8� YM w O... i:? iY •Op01 3 • b wla11410 Mb°,m[Kwa 11 ASK f1.1SK1 tt001 - 000 a 13 1 MIA 121.n.S I. la LAOS.Y.ISL.•POP.•.1611 S.f. ..30•0.2 SKIM 121'•..I.O MKT(UK CUTS 13.E s f 1 a.O1KS Kur r41.11 rsr Sr brt...mn1.K1 a O aKLOfI SIKS IS Sala.I.mom% 1K.....IIq r KIK SOW.ra I.KIUK SIM 0.. 1 1ap..fr s r Koulal. WC. !! M6.1 IK VICINITY MAP i,fa3403.1. T16 IK.IK.a..S;..u.I.NISI.•..•ma. L MAKSSaPOWIK lrai Iriwlluf is 011ffI Knur. °••In!TOWWOKS O I r Q2 • IA1;11 1111111 \\-----• , . ..:1 //7----1- 11 I 1111 ,-'•- Kipammo UMw 1011.••• 1 . 1r \� a r 3 II G I I _ _ _. Kr.lx.o•..11 T-- - - - - -- ; rKx.o..al/ 0 . II �� _ _+9ses___�- � 1 � __ _ __ 11IrKwsflsxil �1I 1 I I i` I I I %��//�/i xT I.I I rill I I I I-- ! x • ..,,,i. - - EL � w i. I`�J-r �•—r '—ll•1 k . —rl-- ---ram x 13=1 "— A 1., ' p1 = k _ ... I I _ v v v y r—a �� v v v v • . . 1\ v. a r • \ wv —1 I PROPOSED WILDING FOOTPRINT; 58,15T 5F. i _ : , !1 rn I 1 = s I N� "41 ...Oa MYR ! MEII.. 8000•F. i i, .oq IC.O..K«.M [x� I • ` max K Stu. 106.T51• h _ 1 _COI ORM UMW SS...K•.a11..,.1.. E-I off: I I..AMAS.. — ---- I Q-',. • .w.w n p•L n n n c .c. o n 1�, I .maw.MaKKK10 ..11�1 •�� Is•°I'alea ' a,a i 3 'a r SW 's _ i _a.v i .. I 1r rKaK..r•K. i I WI E-I A Sr imp AA ` ... r . . 71 ► _A F •` II . . a °'° ;I III ,1, I I,- �' I ,' � , .. i z I• • , -�i I rr _!A ill J --- rn z pl - • Egg.--- STIALIPION.. .. .. .. 216 .Mewl — • - - - - -- - - - - - - L.... _ _ — :-,...,t __ ""' ;;M �. — ,•A. _ p 2 LIND AVENUE — _ - — — — = IK a o • °' .. ��` 11111111111i�g� w��LINp gvFN E _ al M a ` L.... aao.w.,fa:R.ti v 4, SITE PLAN m i I I f SD-1 • r..r --,-1 1 I I' 10/19/99 00:45 am CACAO\983000LF\50-1 C.9 � ...III . I----._.,,_______ I „..„ / `III .ti gW ? "°-^ K r7o r __ �'.. C:���iii::-•__ya= \� r.T:r_—_.. MO sr Ss 1\ �r V ttt- 1 I 1A� d y�� : -� ."_ — INltl� SIOEwAuc T no `'L"�.; N� • / (.. ,._.. �,� �'Im�IP to REOLOCBATED . � �� _ UV Sr/ �,1,/ ■1 ■ °�l-agi ,:� 1 ��� Mir ,. L3��►� 1• Iw ■ I '1E,J— VICINITY MAP —1 yI L /f���yr- 0 lit i _ �� �� , ; : ,�•1 �.33 i� .P11 Nor TO ) 1. 1 i I ', I �.+ i '�d n�1pr L. i BENCHMARK AND DATUM "� M" Iw .c TOP) T •-r 1 . - il ftl ,i C.r a . *''. • 1«. n t. 1 a•'sa errrn�u¢°oa rro r" � l� roNroue N¢Dvu-r F aE I 1 i / 1 , .Z, ' ., 1 o t LEGAL DESCRIPTION: py I ; — i (�-T- 1 .., r _ ' o s,AAD,a�.�.r N rW�/�,_.,_,..9.,,DAD.,ij. e' y -r.:)'.�"� LFF 19.0 i •`1 --, 1 ..,.. r. ..:r� ro swwr xAr rtc cDacm w.r.a�xrmt�cn+�.N nw ' 1'I ` N0.MAfll90r; 9NAI[N MF Cr.r c' i LOT--3- . 11 M ' �, rA ro /% i ADE l i '� ... LOT 7 �• AL�i�00R DRAINS FF/s.o i ,.,,.I GENERAL NOTES: // / .POND 1 Iv•� BP NO w.- TO BE CONNECTED ...>s TJ�' (03)1121-014 F I /% -- I i i...••`a. r; TO SANITARY SEWER DDCY .,,:j OPNEP. POMI.DEKUNENr Oa µ L ) / u ~'.,� - >, • W/PI �R.rt wi crov Paul ,•i -- / 0^-WATER / mommuminn „` ��iti _ ' ■`■ DEKLroER: PACWK DUF RP(p[FDES N[ NOQ , ■ ISO.bE XANIAx A.E..SECOND fLCM •�.. ,.' Oa _.„...-. \\ • `�V)♦t'Al�� NEP JNI N CA azaeo-xnz \ \�'� ,r T —' ' --,r r Ai 13��\�iu r.'�OWri Ln uvrxcicw Pe%.u'°0 \ •7D. EXTRUDED�}�Rfj AI�N - yPw - , I (aAA).]1-zs>r \ \ rry _ II T SIDC OF PARKIN'./ --- -`N,\ _ \ \ .r'` .., .l ^° .."p9 1 „ •• �a�M� ,. sue.rrcw: ILNO SECOND Alr StissacA as Ne \\ J. ,,' I PE.",'o .✓i x _ 1 WASHING TOY WOO �' _y �o-..�� APCn,rFCr: OAND KEN"'ANC TEM '181.9 • .,7-.:� r.-�+ •' (�' ■11�■� IInO D..;wAr DMA-.9PR rr6 W �A� ___ w _ .9 SCAMS. SNINLrON PP PP XM .!J- _r ( ) .PPE r r w�� •I� 1 LEGEND E11Na.o OMEN. la -_—WPM Lot ______.Pxo-n PRELIMINARY --.-- °comersIV NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION •▪ �.0w. . O ..wn . • PAR.unnr O r F:P: TREECE•COMPANY INC. • OE+wrCraW 1 POOOKI•P31PD �iPL r1 A - wrr,..ur IXw u�u~rEP•.rvr. •i'.A .r C I r" - P,O F' R SALT T O tS .rm><..ra DEPARTMENT Or PUBLIC WORKS .s..a r NR.err PRELIMINARY GRADING DRAINAGE. 08 orrA WATER AND SANITARY SEWER PLAN — — — — — — — ------------------------------------- - ----------------- D•KAMD enec 1 3'KRMO WPM '`1- u*A 5PC 155 aSA ,ro S95 ,ro 356 356 SIC SSlS '�.\ 4 RN '•' v 0��:�'°�a►' '� OP��Ot:� .� a\\\ v;..\oi�oi:�;C:.. � e;:, \ ,\� O��r yo`\o ��o\��z p ‘e1vo����\vL. ! ��\�� \� o1ve o\�e\ �� \ O Q�1s♦+ 00 OO• i �r ♦�„` a, O O, O \ O� ,� O Os�\°1411: O 0�0 T, !`,0 .•ita"M. O uw �vp�:A�O Ol 7\,,O .t O �♦O O s��,1�O r�1441 •,\ `O,;Pt•PAS,20. °�S� 01 ta�•e� 0,;,;,�0.. !, } \�.�.a A\'��.5 �� •,N,�':�$.6���C`�.a� ►�a�,.S:t\`�t\ 4r��i•�\�:.���v:�.�'ta•.\��.cl;��\�\�!,P�\�A'��.a`..�.\�� �!.1`\1A\�a'•�\���\`�������t��\\1� i Y 3 ra" 91'1` prig !/re '/'/ %'1 1 A7, /r1`, i. z �_ 'i t �� 4 t t t t t� t W sn,sa SSA ,sw 11G 7EA 151 15A 2 A 5RN SSA 1Pc zG 10 MA 1EA 7Pc zu slel qw. zu !la SPa aSA e,P • a Y a Tu. •.t+ co, ,IN 55A 6aA JU v v v v v v B sH '' El: ?�'' S �`- an n :is• :�;: =S1 500. 4 Pr "g.'' PROPOSED BUILDING PROPOSED BUILDING QW il �C' ' �ro ��� ��� ���� ���� ���� ssro Q p p ay.: a 0512 OWE OrPIQ ORM alga . si 1i BOa soB sae ' s N 1 SN 60, 6PJ 60e Sae/R SOe/R SOe/R 500 SN 60e SPJ SOe SR IRE. SR 60B SPJ SOB SPJ �d I cll. 1 1 1 •• f f f •••• ,. ko zzn • Bu zu Su zu c �u z� • zu za • } a5 5Io 111111 maigaA I :_ , a 8g Ak zu a E zu zu opt lr` eeA t�J. ire0 O ► It'll►_ "it =tea 913LVAS lit ....... AZ:-,,,v3.rittergrarrie,Totr.06va2---- - isi 6EA N 0 d SO' f0• 120-Zt50-7 n f L i I M • W I- �" %AZP.w-0' 0 I— \ ce X E I--- c�0 QIII 4.. 3 V ox a �, 0 1— / U 3 [.--, ao U V,,/ Q z w I Brumbaugh&Associates 0. as I apDp wou.APE 1 Len Esc•p• Archil•clur• t,,Q utw.••® PLAN li 5 ,,,,I 1 ii i : ,-%:•' nip 1 11 Milliiip 1 i i p 1 It IPO PP 1 i q i 1 i ! it ir9 1 ,T 1)ii II e =1RN€ NI=NIIIL==BN= IIgN 7 — llh. hEor , E j u€sas'cu�xx ; COW ENN f ` r a ! 'l�Z� INI IMIT=M Ik a iAAAAh h tC I � 00000 00 00 ���� � h�,hhh hl, hh ii - 5 im i> pi PA 01K 1 11--,„„Aillit___:. alkt 2 1 1 q 1 1 .NAIL , 4 4 4q 1GIN,,,+ � Al lam' ' i 1 1 0 b =irk, t a 'woMoo:.,.,,. g lirtre ' 1 -101111 yq 1AAa I i i it r S h �. € Bgii S 0i1 • 0" E " ♦3"3-83 M a q l kPACIFIC GULF PROPERTIES • ` 3N ^Y.M µ Mrwn• „ ) � LIND AVE. AND SW 39TH ST. CALa•p RENTON, WASHINGTON 1273O GATEWAY OWE WI 116 BY Ca SEATTI.E.1 6 WASHINGTT MR I-�19 B _ _ _ vis'w : _ 4.. ® 4 .... Q p w• o-.. �_-A I I I ri "Ci : ; i I I 1 - o-"- I 4 I 1 I- - `-© °-.' r + .; ... i 1 i a ;i ar 4 ,, 1 r so--, _I— -+ —4 — +--© Qr i '123 -}---1- r i ®—' . , — — --O 4 I0 I = .Y s _►— — - ..iie .;4 ; i ° *i 1,0,. -1— H- - - 1 1 C I O—`` I — — '--0 ,w -- ► I I i r i— 4i I a F;�'__. 1 ---1 + 4— -.^ {�� II I I I Si o—` - I H- - - ..._0 i ,-I M1' 11 o- ` r 1 f - - --o I I I 1 11 II IiIIII JI V/W■ WY / M. b � w•� b PHONE (206) 433--W9 7 m a+n o ,,,,,,■ MOM Y90 r PACIFIC GULF PROPERTIES • OF" OWN In P,,j, o LIND AVE. AND SW 39TH ST. "` O""'' —gym®w'DAN, RENTON, WASHINGTON GAMUT � � _ _ a6 01.13 �/ercNiect la e , e e PANTED RASNNG [PdN1E TLT IP LtNc.PTE REAL tt II •I I I 1 1 I I I U r It- ,, • a a Li.... . . sTI1000 solar YD FRAW1l.OJE i i ACCBR BYO RRNE(QEAR(tlV WEST ELEVATION SOUTH HALF ° �696 l i k ee TILT-LP CONCRETE Lv NBEATED E 5 v1E ((6 .r.©• LALISCAFE TERT PANTED RASNNG PANTED TILT-W CONCRETE , REVEAL .It il - 1 U E, l 0 I 1 I L ISO -o 6TCC0 saw ay ( ALA0t(C wax -ACCENT BYO BYO RR.X.E(CLEAR uU !� BrCNIE CLASS 3 TILT-LP NGAATED WEST ELEVATION NORTH HALF LANSCAPE BEM iPANTED RASuNG vu E N6'. PANTED FLASNNG / 602(.-\ PANTED TILT-LP COIGTE PANTED TILT-IP CO TE. REv£AL 11 W5 I . 11 I�iMMI ��� ig m a III.m..I.�L.1----arlimmi �,• !._•,,,.., A((rMr1 LROCW STUCCO GORE YO �BND� T ALUMNI r.OWI o CRWFRAMII GLASS CLEAR)AU ACCENT MD FRAMIILT.IPCONCFE1E EV BRONZE GLASS Et 4,4 A` 44 u N.LAIED ILT-LP CACRTE YY LAMCAPE LER1 'CLEATED - NORTH ELEVATION ""SC`'PE EMI SOUTH ELEVATION 0 Topa 0O!FORMATION RANT) ",' pcALE:IN•.r-0' SCALE:NY.r-Ar Se(U W 1PANTED RASNNG LODE LQYSO [PANTED TILT-UP CCNCFEIE O P ELE•BASE BYO(RODDA PAM) y WAAL__A ` PALACE BLUE F+i LM-33- F O LQIER B.NO fR'ODA PAMI ill j.: ROCKWVEN 0 x •L! In-61 C4 E. BYO fQLL,-rIDOIE) a Z ' •li- F a te" z EAST ELEVATION NORTH HALF z 5CN-E V6'.I'-®•- - PANTED IItT-IFS d [PANTED TILT-LP CONCRETE •� ~ dF ti J 711pi�" ■ f - 11 (is a EAST ELEVATION SOUTH HALF EL- . • ,CA_,1V•r-e. ENLARGE Pacific Gulf Properties 3600&3800 Lind Avenue SW Environmental Review/WO#78564 November 22, 1999 TRANSPORTATION: 1. The traffic mitigation fee is $75 dollars per new trip generated as determined from the ITE Tripe Generation Manual. Estimated trips are .850 daily trips per the The Transpo Group. $75 x 850 (Daily trips)=$63,750 2. A Six (6) foot side walk is required to be located on Lind Ave. SW with the back edge of the side located at the property line and a minimum or greater 6-foot planter strip located between the curb and sidewalk. 3. Driveway entrance at the south end and front of the building is to close to a signalised interestion and is to be eliminated. 99cm 100T /Z// 7 f s a_ 99CM100T.DOC\ City of Renton Department of Planning/Building.r Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:—TVLIASFOV how COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 22, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA99-105,SA-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: NOVEMBER 8, 1999 099 vELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF RCNTOM t APPLICANT: Barton Treece PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen PROJECT TITLE: Pacific Gulf Properties WORK ORDER NO: 78564 NOV 0 9 1999 LOCATION: 3600&3800 Lind Avenue SW RECEIVED SITE AREA: 7.39 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): 106,752 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construct a 106,752 sq.ft.warehouse/office building. The building footprint would be approximately 98,752 sq. ft.with an additional 8,000 sq. ft. of mezzanine. The front of the building facing Lind Ave. SW would have four recessed areas of loading docks and glass-front office entries. The back of the building would have on-grade loading access. Access is proposed via three (3)drives off Lind Ave. SW. The north access is an existing driveway to be used in common with Farwest Steel and the south access is the existing back exit for the Act Ill Theaters. The proposal would construct one additional driveway cut in the center of the site frontage. The site plan includes 234 parking spaces. A wetland area that was created for mitigation for the Home Base and Act III Theater projects is located on the east part of the site. The proposal maintains a 25-foot undisturbed buffer width from the wetland edge. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth _ Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS 2 E'_. C h fr e ?c 5 C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. ////v/ -y Signature of Director or Authorized Repre ntative Date routingform Rev.10/93 Pacific Gulf Properties 3600&3800 Lind Avenue SW Environmental Review/WO#78564 November 22, 1999 TRANSPORTATION: 1. The traffic mitigation fee is $75 dollars per new trip generated as determined from the ITE Tripe Generation Manual. Estimated trips are .850 daily trips per the The Transpo Group. $75 x 850 (Daily trips)=$63,750 2. A Six (6) foot side walk is required to be located on Lind Ave. SW with the back edge of the side located at the property line and a minimum or greater 6-foot planter strip located between the curb and sidewalk. 3. Driveway entrance at the south end and front of the building to be located a distance of 50-feet from the curb line of Lind Ave. SW. 99cm l 00T 99CM100T.DOC1 ti( Y azo TRANSPORTATION MITIGATION FEE Project Name Pa C ( �i c G u If l Yopev-fres Project Address 3 d D U 3d00 ,Ll C-, 1-1) , 5 Iv Contact Person Y'F. h v e --Ge- Address .3 Z 4-ve . �So ki Yl0 L'2-4 J WA 67803 Phone Number ( /2 ) 7/ ZZ -- a57 7 Permit Number Project Description 1 ki)et52- Land Use Type: Method of calculation: ❑ Residential ITE Trip Generation Manual 6 A'D ❑ Retail ❑ Traffic Study ����/07) o0o ❑ Non-retail ❑ Other �D% j�.."` Ase y 7c. e5 Calculation: Sal ZJd-yeh' se / 6 o " 3a4Z 4u5h-(2i2-2-o " x eip 1 .‘3J 7�b i�r��S a �4 � <v' Ps) fir, 9 S Transportation Mitigation Fee: ,( / 7-52) / /77Calculated by: Date: /�� Account Number: Date of Payment • 1 • •• Transportation end Traffic Engineering PLANNING • DESIGN The Transpo Group July 16, 1999 TG: 99311.00 PMENT PL,NS•11NG DEvEI-O CIT•Y pF RENTON jUL 2 2 1999 Mr. Bart Treece '` D Treece & Company RECEIVED ECE V,C G 320 Second Avenue S, Suite 200 I� Kirkland, WA 98033 SUBJECT: PACIFIC GULF PROPERTIES BUILDING ON LIND AVENUE SW Dear Bart, The purpose of this letter is to provide some of the preliminary information relevant to the traffic analysis being conducted for the proposed Pacific Gulf Properties building on Lind Avenue SW at SW 39th Street. We are currently reviewing the scope of work with Neil Watts at the City of Renton, and hope to conduct the traffic analysis over the next several weeks, For your initial filing, this letter includes a brief description of the project and the trip generation for the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) checklist. Once we have completed the traffic study, we will coordinate through your office to submit the report to the City of Renton. Project Description The proposed project includes a new building of approximately 107,000 gross square feet. About 40 percent of the building space would be identified for office use, 30 percent for warehouse, and 30 percent for light industrial. The site is located east of Lind Avenue at SW 39th Street in Renton. Three access points are proposed for the site on Lind Avenue SW. The proposed north access would be shared with the existing access for Farwest Steel, The middle access would be a new driveway on Lind Avenue SW. The southern access would utilize the existing driveway for the East Valley Cinema site onto Lind Avenue at SW 39th Street. Trip Generation The trip generation estimate for the proposed building is based on trip generation rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation (6th Edition, 1997). Since the mix of uses in the building will vary between office, warehouse, and industrial uses, the trip generation reflects the projected amount of each. Trip generation was estimated for both daily and PM peak hour conditions, as shown in Table 1. The TRANSPO Group. Inc. 11730 118th Avenue N.E., Suite 600 Kirkland. Washington 98034-7120 FAX 425/825-8434 425/821-3665 Mr. Bart Treece The July 16, 1999 Transpo Page 2 Group Table 1.Trip Generation Summary for the Pacific Gulf Properties Building on Lind Avenue SW.1 Amount ITE Daily Daily PM Peak PM Peak Hour Trips 107,000 gsf Building (gsf) Trip Rate Trips Trip Rate Total In Out 40%Office Use 43,000 11.01 470 1.49 64 11 53 30%Warehouse Use 32,000 4.96 160 0.51 16 4 12 30% Industrial Uses 32,000 6.97 220 0.98 31 4 27 Totals 107,000 850 111 19 92 1. Trip rates from ITE's Trip Generation, 6th Edition(1997). Land Uses#710 for Office,#150 for Warehouse,#110 Industrial. As shown in Table 1, the proposed 107,000 gsf building would generation about 850 trips per weekday, with 111 occurring during the PM peak hour. The resulting in/out distribution at the site driveways would be 19 in and 92 out during the PM peak hour. I trust that the information included in this letter provides you the trip generation information needed for the initial SEPA checklist. Please call me if you have any questions related to the information included in this letter, or any aspect of the traffic study. Sincerely, The TRANSPO Group, Inc. ) Jeff L. Schramm Transportation Engineer M:\89\9931111NMETTER 1.DOC (SY O CITY OF RENTON FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU MEMORANDUM DATE: December 8, 1999 TO: Peter Rosen, Planner FROM: Jim Gray, Assistant Fire Marshal\ ,S- — SUBJECT: Pacific Gulf Properties, 36008s 38 0 Lind Av SW MITIGATION ITEMS; 1. A fire mitigation fee of$55 511.04.08 is required based on $.52 per — �c5 g q square foot of the building square footage. FIRE CODE REQUIREMENTS: 1. The preliminary fire flow is 4,000 GPM, one hydrant is required within 150 feet of the structure and three additional hydrants are required within 300 feet of the structure. A looped water main is required to be looped around the building. 2. Separate plans and permit are required for the installation of the required fire alarm and sprinkler systems. 3. Fire Department access roadways are required to within 150 feet of all portions of the building exterior. Roadways are a minimum 20 in width with a turning radius of 45 foot outside and 25 foot inside. 4. Provide a list of the flammable, combustible liquids and any hazardous chemical to be used or stored on site. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Fire- ft re A (-V\ COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 22, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA99-105,SA-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: NCIVEMeEFpi,gleb� r.. APPLICANT: Barton Treece PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen PROJECT TITLE: Pacific Gulf Properties WORK ORDER NO: 7856U D 9 1099 LOCATION: 3600&3800 Lind Avenue SW SITE AREA: 7.39 acres BUILDING AREA(gross :�t) ;4i2NI.CD SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construct a 106,752 sq. ft.warehouse/office building. The building footprint would be approximately 98,752 sq. ft. with an additional 8,000 sq. ft. of mezzanine. The front of the building facing Lind Ave. SW would have four recessed areas of loading docks and glass-front office entries. The back of the building would have on-grade loading access. Access is proposed via three (3)drives off Lind Ave. SW. The north access is an existing driveway to be used in common with Farwest Steel and the south access is the existing back exit for the Act Ill Theaters. The proposal would construct one additional driveway cut in the center of the site frontage. The site plan includes 234 parking spaces. A wetland area that was created for mitigation for the Home Base and Act Ill Theater projects is located on the east part of the site. The proposal maintains a 25-foot undisturbed buffer width from the wetland edge. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet C. Nil,-54.4.,,N c e e - • /0o rylajo1' -6,11 ryRo,t,.nt,ler / ,�ip_&75 /2 fe B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS ,J4 C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS.. ee 44.1j eviv l:n JinOt e47c We have r: iewed this application ,ith particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are.s wh=e additional informatio f eeded to properly assess this proposal. C � �'/, // /)/// Si, - re of Director or Authonz-d Repr ntative Date ro Rev.10/93 (VY O� CITY OF RENTON FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU MEMORANDUM DATE: November 10, 1999 TO: Peter Rosen, Planner FROM: Jim Gray, Assistant Fire Marshal )ti SUBJECT: Pacific Gulf Properties, 36008 38 0 Lind Av SW MITIGATION ITEMS; 1. A fire mitigation fee of$55,935.08 is required based on $.52 per square foot of the building square footage. FIRE CODE REQUIREMENTS: 1. The preliminary fire flow is 4,000 GPM, one hydrant is required within 150 feet of the structure and three additional hydrants are required within 300 feet of the structure. A looped water main is required to be looped around the building. 2. Separate plans and permit are required for the installation of the required fire alarm and sprinkler systems. 3. Fire Department access roadways are required to within 150 feet of all portions of the building exterior. Roadways are a minimum 20 in width with a turning radius of 45 foot outside and 25 foot inside. 4. Provide a list of the flammable, combustible liquids and any hazardous chemical to be used or stored on site. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 0C-Ql vU1v. COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 22, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA99-105,SA-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: NOVEMBER 8, 1999 APPLICANT: Barton Treece PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen PROJECT TITLE: Pacific Gulf Properties WORK ORDER NO: 78564 LOCATION: 3600 &3800 Lind Avenue SW SITE AREA: 7.39 acres l BUILDING AREA(gross): 106,752 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construct a 106,752 sq. ft. warehouse/office building. The building footprint would be approximately 98,752 sq. ft. with an additional 8,000 sq. ft. of mezzanine. The front of the building facing Lind Ave. SW would have four recessed areas of loading docks and glass-front office entries. The back of the building would have on-grade loading access. Access is proposed via three (3)drives off Lind Ave. SW. The north access is an existing driveway to be used in common with Farwest Steel and the south access is the existing back exit for the Act III Theaters. The proposal would construct one additional driveway cut in the center of the site frontage. The site plan includes 234 parking spaces. A wetland area that was created for mitigation for the Home Base and Act Ill Theater projects is located on the east part of the site. The proposal maintains a 25-foot undisturbed buffer width from the wetland edge. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS !t j cU ot.t 4.)( t 5 4J i:3 . SzerA2oc PLRruv,nr c� SIT(.( i S 10nt c.N/i 7 CZY'yt_io Leo-v9\rf r4rz - V C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date routingform Rev.10/93 City of R.....,,.I Department of Planning/Building/Public ' s ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: rcui COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 22, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA99-105,SA-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: NOVEMBER 8, 1999 APPLICANT: Barton Treece PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen PROJECT TITLE: Pacific Gulf Properties WORK ORDER NO: 78564 LOCATION: 3600&3800 Lind Avenue SW SITE AREA: 7.39 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): 106,752 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construct a 106,752 sq. ft. warehouse/office building. The building footprint would be approximately 98,752 sq. ft.with an additional 8,000 sq. ft. of mezzanine. The front of the building facing Lind Ave. SW would have four recessed areas of loading docks and glass-front office entries. The back of the building would have on-grade loading access. Access is proposed via three (3)drives off Lind Ave. SW. The north access is an existing driveway to be used in common with Farwest Steel and the south access is the existing back exit for the Act III Theaters. The proposal would construct one additional driveway cut in the center of the site frontage. The site plan includes 234 parking spaces. A wetland area that was created for mitigation for the Home Base and Act Ill Theater projects is located on the east part of the site. The proposal maintains a 25-foot undisturbed buffer width from the wetland edge. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation - T Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet a/a 6 ,7%.__ /0 i g 7 AL/ B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS �:C_71.7,,c A.,.,,/ �� !?�/'Y) ya/i/C k ,fie bard /�a4ir6/cao �74 &ezi-anOiCt-84 t s ic/� Cif Of � ` 74 pc„,,,,, t/��7 � � � 7'�/ lad ( ,be- R2 / 1,Z)V de/Odetei//0-4-72, C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS -1/( //( C(// e 7' 1 e e 4) We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas w e additional information is nee d to properly assess this proposal. ZZ_______ l/ /0/rr Signature irector or Authori ed epresen ve Date routingform Rev.10/93 • City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: `'_3L1~.E-acf' COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 22, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA99-105,SA-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: NOVEMBER 8, 19 VELOPMENT SERVICEs APPLICANT: Barton Treece PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen cal(OE RENTON PROJECT TITLE: Pacific Gulf Properties WORK ORDER NO: 78564 N_OV 0 9 1999 LOCATION: 3600&3800 Lind Avenue SW ' #�C`CE'\�C SITE AREA: 7.39 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): 106,752 sq.ft. M ID SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construct a 106,752 sq. ft. warehouse/office building. The building footprint would be approximately 98,752 sq. ft.with an additional 8,000 sq. ft. of mezzanine. The front of the building facing Lind Ave. SW would have four recessed areas of loading docks and glass-front office entries. The back of the building would have on-grade loading access. Access is proposed via three (3)drives off Lind Ave. SW. The north access is an existing driveway to be used in common with Farwest Steel and the south access is the existing back exit for the Act Ill Theaters. The proposal would construct one additional driveway cut in the center of the site frontage. The site plan includes 234 parking spaces. A wetland area that was created for mitigation for the Home Base and Act Ill Theater projects is located on the east part of the site. The proposal maintains a 25-foot undisturbed buffer width from the wetland edge. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the I Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth _ Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities V Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS --PP V -tee I// > C'eft,- C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. ////b/ / Signature of Director or Authorized Representative . Date routingfonn Rev.10/93 Pacific Gulf Properties 3600&3800 Lind Avenue SW Environmental Review/WO#78564 November 22, 1999 SEWER: 1. The Sewer System Development Connection charge is $0.078 per gross site area. Show total square feet of site area and show area of any wetlands on site. 2. A clean-out is required 5-feet out from the building. 3. A backflow prevention device is required on the sewer line if the floor elevation is below 25-ft. Show the floor elevation the plans. 4. Show vertical clearances over or under existing 16-inch water main. 4. Sewer line to have a slope of 2%to the property line. 5. If the project produce fats, oils, or grease, then an appropriate removal system will be required per plumbing code . 6. Drawings to meet City of Renton drafting Standards. 7. A verical profile will be required. 99cm100S 99CM100S.DOC\ Pacific Gulf Properties 3600 & 3800 Lind Avenue SW Environmental Review/WO#78564 November 22, 1999 STORM DRAINAGE: 1. The Storm System Development Connection charge is $0.129 per square foot of new impervious surface area, but not less than $385. Show on plan the amount of new imperious surface area and the square feet of wetlands on the site. j2. The design of the detention pond must demonstrate adequacy for detention, water quality and conveyance capacity. 3. Use NAVD 1988 datum for elevations. 4. Show vertical profile of storm line on construction plan. 5. Drawings need to show where water will drain to at the north end of the building. 6. The project to meet King County 1990 Surface Water Design manual requirements. The Preliminary Drainage Report appears to be acceptable. 99cm100D 99CM100D.DOC\ City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ?6v Loa COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 22, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA99-105,SA-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: NOVEMBER 8, 19MEVELOPMENT SERVICE APPLICANT: Barton Treece PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen CITY OF RENTUN PROJECT TITLE: Pacific Gulf Properties WORK ORDER NO: 78564 NOV 12 1999 LOCATION: 3600&3800 Lind Avenue SW RECEIVED SITE AREA: 7.39 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): 106,752 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construct a 106,752 sq. ft. warehouse/office building. The building footprint would be approximately 98,752 sq. ft. with an additional 8,000 sq. ft. of mezzanine. The front of the building facing Lind Ave. SW would have four recessed areas of loading docks and glass-front office entries. The back of the building would have on-grade loading access. Access is proposed via three (3)drives off Lind Ave. SW. The north access is an existing driveway to be used in common with Farwest Steel and the south access is the existing back exit for the Act III Theaters. The proposal would construct one additional driveway cut in the center of the site frontage. The site plan includes 234 parking spaces. A wetland area that was created for mitigation for the Home Base and Act Ill Theater projects is located on the east part of the site. The proposal maintains a 25-foot undisturbed buffer width from the wetland edge. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS c l�ilt�7-t zi"Po C li e--r-'<-2 f , C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to property assess this proposal. / -- r ( i/2t%� ////0 Signature of Director or Authorized Repres tative Date routingform Rev.10/93 Pacific Gulf Properties 3600&3800 Lind Avenue SW Environmental Review/WO#78564 November 22, 1999 WATER: 11. The Water System Development Connection charge is $0.113 per gross site square feet. 2. Station numbers to be shown on the loop water line. Also show station number and off-set for water valves. 3. Two (2) additional valves will be require on the loop water main that extends to the three (3) proposed fire hydrants. 4. Maintain a minimum of 7.5-foot separation from the storm line at the south end of the project. 5. A 5-inch storz adapter will be require on all new or existing hydrants used to me the required fire flow standards. 6. Domestic and irrigation meter size and location to be shown. Also show size and location of the sprinkler system with the backflow prevention device. 7. Drawings to meet City of Renton drafting Standards. /8. A vertical profile will be required. 9. Loop Water Main to be in a 15-ft utility easement. 99cm 100W 99CM100W.DOC\ • City of en ton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION R VIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: \-)Ok COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER , 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA99-105,SA-H, F DATE CIRCULATED: NOVEMB 8, 1999 APPLICANT: Barton Treece PROJECT MANAGER: Pet osen PROJECT TITLE: Pacific Gulf Properties WORK ORDER N • 4 LOCATION: 3600&3800 Lind Avenue SW SITE AREA: 7.39 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): 106,752 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construct a 106,752 sq. ft.warehouse/office building. The building footprint would be approximately 98,752 sq. ft. with an additional 8,000 sq. ft. of mezzanine. The front of the building facing Lind Ave. SW would have four recessed areas of loading docks and glass-front office entries. The back of the building would have on-grade loading access. Access is proposed via three (3)drives off Lind Ave. SW. The north access is an existing driveway to be used in common with Farwest Steel and the south access is the existing back exit for the Act III Theaters. The proposal would construct one additional driveway cut in the center of the site frontage. The site plan includes 234 parking spaces. A wetland area that was created for mitigation for the Home Base and Act III Theater projects is located on the east part of the site. The proposal maintains a 25-foot undisturbed buffer width from the wetland edge. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet 55 t 2 fckd C', rn mice B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where a ditional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 10- 5. 7 Signature of ctor or u orized Representative Date routingform Rev.10/93 • PROJECT LUA-99-105, SA-H, ECF Pacific Gulf Properties City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET (Continuation) POLICE RELATED COMMENTS 55.19 Police Calls for Service Estimated Annually CONSTRUCTION PHASE Theft from construction sites is one of the most common reported crimes in the city. To protect materials and equipment it is recommended that all materials and tools be locked up when not in use. The site will need security lighting and any construction trailer should be completely fenced in with portable chain-link fencing. The fence will provide both a physical and psychological barrier to any prospective thief and will demonstrate that this area is private property. Construction trailers should be kept locked when not in use, and should also have a heavy-duty deadbolt installed with no less then a 1-1/2" throw when bolted. Glass windows in the trailer should be shatter-resistant. I also recommend the business post the appropriate"No Trespassing"signs on the property while it's under construction(flier attached). This will aid police in making arrests on the property after hours if suspects are observed vandalizing or stealing building materials. Page 1of1 Y� i Tr e s p a s s BUSINES E n f o r c e m e n t WATCH • Quite often, business owners and managers are faced with crimes that occur on the property after the businesses are closed and the employees have gone home. Some of the crimes that occur are burglary, vandalism, graffiti, trespassing, drug dealing and robbery in the parking lots. There is a way for police and business owners to discourage these types of crimes from taking place on private property, and that is by enforcing the City of Renton's Municipal Trespass Code 6-18-10. In order for police to be able to make an arrest for Trespass, business owners or managers need to purchase signs and display them in conspicuous areas on the property. These signs need to include the following language: 1. Indicate that the subject property is privately owned and; 2. Uninvited presence on the specified property is not permitted during the hours the business is closed, and; 3. Violators will be subject to criminal sanctions pursuant to Renton City Code 6-18-10. MOST IMPORTANTLY-THE SIGNS SHOULD BE CONSPICUOUS FROM ALL POSSIBLE POINTS OF ENTRY TO THE PROPERTY, AND ALSO BE PLACED ON THE EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDINGS. This way when a suspect is arrested, he/she will not be able to claim as a defense that he/she did not know he or she was trespassing. EXAMPLES FOR TRESPASS SIGNS: NO TRESPASSING NO TRESPASSING This is private property. Persons without specific No Trespassing after business hours business are not authorized to be on the premises between (insert specific times). Anyone on the the hours of(insert the hours your business is closed). premises after business hours is subject to Violators are subject to arrest and/or citation for criminal arrest and/or citation for Criminal Trespass pursuant to Renton City Code 46-18-10.. Trespass and/or impoundment of vehicle. Per Renton City Code #6-18-10. By enforcing the Trespass Ordinance, business owners and police will be sending a message to criminals that they are not allowed to conduct criminal activity on the property. In making arrests for Trespass, police may be preventing the more serious crimes from taking place. < Y r COURTESY OF RENTON POLICE DEPARTMENT • CRIME PREVENTION UNIT l'AJN 235 - 2571 City o. Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL--}} 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:�U1S1Vt;LCA-hOV1 Sewl(�,\ COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 22, 1 99 APPLICATION NO: LUA99-105,SA-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: NOVEMBER 8, QM olr acNTON APPLICANT: Barton Treece PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosenkl)dd 1 llh PROJECT TITLE: Pacific Gulf Properties WORK ORDER NO: 78564 11W� LOCATION: 3600&3800 Lind Avenue SW i• �(� ' y"grJ SITE AREA: 7.39 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): 106,752 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construct a 106,752 sq. ft. warehouse/office building. The building footprint would be approximately 98,752 sq. ft.with an additional 8,000 sq. ft. of mezzanine. The front of the building facing Lind Ave. SW would have four recessed areas of loading docks and glass-front office entries. The back of the building would have on-grade loading access. Access is proposed via three (3)drives off Lind Ave. SW. The north access is an existing driveway to be used in common with Farwest Steel and the south access is the existing back exit for the Act Ill Theaters. The proposal would construct one additional driveway cut in the center of the site frontage. The site plan includes 234 parking spaces. A wetland area that was created for mitigation for the Home Base and Act Ill Theater projects is located on the east part of the site. The proposal maintains a 25-foot undisturbed buffer width from the wetland edge. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet • B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS 9 7 ?(-44-........_ce7.,e(se, . ‘ 747/1/8 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas wherfaradditional information is needed tp properly assess this proposal. 111(/'" --" "7/ //,,z/?q Si ture 3f Director uthorizzed Re esentative Date rouUnpform Rev.10/93 CITY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION LIST OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS within 300 feet of the subject site PROJECT NAME: XGch _ `4 uh APPLICATION NO: LUPc 19 • 10 S , 51A -tt �-t The following is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. The Development Services Division will notify these individuals of the proposed development. NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 5e4 Wasj C,?)' 4,<(•ct (Attach additional sheets, if necessary) • (Continued) NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER Applicant Certification I,, s. a� �^DgCG , , hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjaccpt property (Print Name) Vv• niS owners and their addresses were obtained from: - ff► �SO'�, ❑ City of Renton Technical Services Records -co%,?' 'Title Company Records =�� �.O �� e: % Cr King County Assessors Records " ,;; ' Signed Datef-ifj•1✓� `1, 1/4.„'�,,,..,,,excis__ ( plicant) t' •t,. F WAIN NOTARY ATTESTED. Subscribe and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington, residing at �' L- I'a_�F on the day of .i1d,1—Y , 19 99. Signed �� VU , (Notary Public) *`"*`For City of Renton Use**** CERTIFICATION OF MAILING I, L. St-.-cl-e1';hereby certify that notices of the proposed application were mailed to (City Employee) each listed property owner on ►1OV VII`�1 . Signed S&VJadt_ Se- Date: ON , M411 NOTARY ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing a� ta. 0-," on the oZ,n cl day of ,(Op , 19 9 ` EF Signed (d1AR1'�YN P BAG listprop.doc �®T1��� REV 07/98 MARILYN KAMCHEFF STATE OF WASHINGTON MY APPOINTMENTEXPIRES:6-29-03 2 COMJUNEI29, 3RES • troScan/King (WA) Owner :G I Joes Inc Parcel# : 125360 0010 07 Site :9300 SW 34Th St Renton Sale Date :03/28/1996 Mail :9505 SW Boeckman Rd Wilsonville Or 97070 Sale Price : $1,375,000 Use :932 Vacant,Industrial,1 To 5 Acres Asd.V : $1,375,400 Lgl :LOT 1 BURLINGTON NORTHERN-BSP Q : SW S :30 T:23N R :05E Bedrm : Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac:4.51 YB: Ph: Owner :Burlington Northern Railroa Parcel# : 125360 0020 05 Site :3501 E Valley Rd Renton 98055 Sale Date :07/06/1992 Mail :3501 E Valley Rd Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price . Use :253 Com,Retail Store,25K+Sqft Asd.V : $8,128,700 Lgl :LOT 2&POR 3 BURLINGTON NORTHERN Q : SW S : 30 T:23N R : 05E Bedrm : Bth F3H: / / Stories: 1 BldgSF: 134,762 Ac: 11.16 YB:1995 Ph: Owner :Eastgate Theatre Inc Parcel# : 125360 0030 03 Site :3751 E Valley Rd Renton 98055 Sale Date :02/08/1996 Mail :7132 Commercial Park Dr Knoxville Tn 37918 Sale Price :$4,573,786 Full Use :347 Rec,Movies,Walk-In Asd.V :$9,787,500 Lgl :LOT POR 3 BURLINGTON NORTHERN BSP Q : SW S :30 T:23N R :05E Bedrm : Bth F3H: / / Stories: 1 BldgSF:74,306 Ac: 12.28 YB:1996 Ph: Owner :Powell-Orillia Llc Parcel# : 125360 0050 08 Site :9300 SW 41St St Renton Sale Date :04/24/1997 Mail :737 Market St Kirkland Wa 98033 Sale Price . Use :931 Vacant,Industrial,Less Than 1 Acre Asd.V :$210,000 Lgl :LOT 6 BURLINGTON NORTHERN-BSP Q :NW S :31 T:23N R :05E Bedrm : Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: .80 YB: Ph:425-828-4444 Owner :Little Deli Mart Inc Parcel# : 125370 0211 02 Site : 19253 84Th Ave S Kent 98032 Sale Date : 11/01/1996 Mail : 19253 84Th Ave S Kent Wa 98032 Sale Price . Use :242 Com,Retail Strip,10K To 25K Sqft Asd.V :$846,500 Lgl :BLK 3 LOT 8 BURLINGTON NORTHERN Q :NE S :01 T:22N R : 04E Bedrm : Bth F3H: / / Stories: 1 BldgSF: 11,800 Ac: 1.18 YB:1987 Ph: Owner :Prudential Ins Co Of Americ Parcel# : 125380 0170 09 Site :4060 Lind Ave SW Renton 98055 Sale Date : 05/17/1985 Mail : 12835 Bel Red Rd#140 Bellevue Wa 98005 Sale Price : $161,568 Use :506 Ind,Warehouse,100K+Sqft Asd.V : $4,354,800 Lgl :BLK 2 LOT 4-5 BURL N ORILLIA IND Q :NW S :31 T:23N R :05E Bedrm : Bth F3H: / / Stories: 1 BldgSF: 133,922 Ac: 5.54 YB:1981 Ph: Owner :Arenberg Investments Parcel# : 125381 0010 02 Site :3401 Lind Ave SW Renton 98055 Sale Date : 12/31/1984 Mail :3401 Lind Ave SW Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price :$672,948 Use :506 Ind,Warehouse,100K+Sqft Asd.V :$4,026,900 Lgl :BLK 5 LOT 1 BURLINGTON NOR IND PK Q : SW S :30 T:23N R :05E Bedrm : Bth F3H: / / Stories: 1 BldgSF: 118,176 Ac: 5.14 YB:1986 Ph: Owner :Badford Property Investor Inc Parcel# : 125381 0020 00 Site : 500 SW 39Th St Renton 98055 Sale Date :07/10/1997 Mail :270 Lafayette Cir Lafayette Ca 94549 Sale Price : $32,165,745 Full Use :264 Off,1-3 Story,50K+Sqft Asd.V : $22,800,000 Lgl :BLK 5 LOT 2-3 &7&BURLINGTON NOR Q : SW S :30 T:23N R : 05E Bedrm : Bth F3H: / / Stories:2 BldgSF: 59,224 Ac: 17.98 YB:1986 Ph: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable,But Is Not Guaranteed. troScan/King (WA) Owner :Badford Property Investor Inc Parcel# : 125381 0020 00 Site :500 SW 39Th St Renton 98055 Sale Date :07/10/1997 Mail :270 Lafayette Cir Lafayette Ca 94549 Sale Price :$32,165,745 Full Use :264 Off,1-3 Story,50K+Sqft Asd.V : $22,800,000 Lgl :BLK 5 LOT 2-3 &7&BURLINGTON NOR Q : SW S :30 T:23N R :05E Bedrm : Bth F3H: / / Stories:2 BldgSF:59,224 Ac: 17.98 YB:1986 Ph: Owner :Badford Property Investor Inc Parcel# : 125381 0020 00 Site :500 SW 39Th St Renton 98055 Sale Date : 07/10/1997 Mail :270 Lafayette Cir Lafayette Ca 94549 Sale Price : $32,165,745 Full Use :264 Off,1-3 Story,50K+Sqft Asd.V : $22,800,000 Lgl : BLK 5 LOT 2-3&7&BURLINGTON NOR Q : SW S :30 T:23N R :05E Bedrm : Bth F3H: / / Stories:2 BldgSF: 59,224 Ac: 17.98 YB:1986 Ph: Owner :Badford Property Investor Inc Parcel# : 125381 0020 00 Site : 500 SW 39Th St Renton 98055 Sale Date :07/10/1997 Mail :270 Lafayette Cir Lafayette Ca 94549 Sale Price : $32,165,745 Full Use :264 Off,1-3 Story,50K+Sqft Asd.V :$22,800,000 Lgl :BLK 5 LOT 2-3&7&BURLINGTON NOR Q : SW S :30 T:23N R :05E Bedrm : Bth F3H: / / Stories:2 BldgSF:95,800 Ac: 17.98 YB:1987 Ph: Owner :Puget Sound Blood Center Parcel# : 125381 0040 06 Site :501 SW 39Th St Renton 98055 Sale Date :01/03/1997 Mail :921 Terry Ave Seattle Wa 98104 Sale Price :$2,000,000 Use :263 Off,1-3 Story,15K To 50K Sqft Asd.V : $1,212,700 Lgl :BLK 5 LOT 4 BURLINGTON NOR IND PK Q : SW S : 30 T:23N R :05E Bedrm : Bth F3H: / / Stories:2 BldgSF:30,000 Ac: 1.92 YB:1986 Ph:206-292-6500 Owner : Victoria Park Parcel# :302305 9001 02 Site : *No Site Address*Renton Sale Date . Mail :PO Box 1104 Renton Wa 98057 Sale Price . Use :901 Vacant,Residential Asd.V :$930 Lgl : STR 302305 TAXLOT 1 POR NE 1/4- Q :NE S :30 T:23N R :05E Bedrm : Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: .92 YB: Ph: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable,But Is Not Guaranteed. KING COUNT "m .i ENTIRE t-P S'.•:/ 30 23 o 5 �! . "-"-e CITY OF RENTON ee�AJ • DE O�F ASSF SMENTS SCALE 1"*10 0' pt -_ sw3UrH ..�34, ,. NW3_Y23.3 f l � t 1 „ _ ii.r ...se'r J j I[ 3 • K ? ' a 3 r r _ I�l Q i M p.. B 1i i 0'1\' 17E0 930.1900 ' r tl _ J �F F = r N..Y ! 1 �\�pJo'`a� r ti - •�� .. ,• r ! 9r 31TM si • -i-- mr • . ;� ii! r era ti , fi _ .7 wT• I l0r■ % Lan a ' I i /1 _ a - 1---7 1 f/ i 6� a "/. _ f .dam •,"..'° .iy` s � _ • / d .. 1 dr o= = e qJ ., Fior z is ❑ 3g N = i s = 3 e f =y j� nfAim 0. "Z"/ • w«3•r4 rr y .. ;� I LOT 3 4 k jai \\� ° VI ..ur-wiw-wry 9 ono.ono. r \`Y\ .✓r`" Jr... 1 .•T I L.0 ur a g' �ti•♦ I ! I . i; T , ..,1 ,,,, , .".''":73;....*"7',..1"''''.4.....*....^,....,,,,....,.:..._ „„......,;.,5 4 TM wu,w m lm.rm C. 119 KING COUNTY '° "@"'�� W.. W . . N,. DEPT. OF ASSESSMENTS sw I30.23-5 scue 1%100' " •ro I wa -„,,,,- 101 M.LOTS G E dam" 4 P 2 .� II �'� I /� s pPRK�Nam' _d�P�� 'r F' ' px I0�� SNE D�y\P '' 8 " . . ' C_ r.. 1 5 ♦# SONCam` s 9uR.31'' r'r --Km. SW ♦IST Si _ —- s,s.. ' —�-- , Z Si we IIS, ST 4 li -1 '1 1 1 �• ! II3 1 . 2 w»A.t " 1/I•1 ! . At'ag5 GEN<Ea1 � . i `F 9 � ° fe t I ,t ,.,soma arm� F�.f . I .� • gI, H W ti4 ... q.✓ ;La... ' .....< a. 1 ate„ sal y'.., aII.� d .... .,r•--1 1. '^Es.i ;Ili• f ,, Iv so 1 t3 '.Po'W? ' sq ,-..s1 /,,,Vc::2 .-."' ,, ''1.'". . . .4 •1-i., F IP Ns- %.ter !�`h«- �I �'a ikm a I .. Aimr I1""yy�� � e / r P 'e' Ivit .�` r{i � L2 r. f ° ma sr rp . 147". y 9 SENT S Ns-w 57013105W A 9 ` mm; `.'/ '... .. 40. ,— t '+' / lo.''E 4' 0'. ,' ' �} ;f 6 4 v a� ,i�, rr,O 1,/, F� W t gall- ^•._ SW 31-23-5 OM nd•...�..•...r.,.�•o4 n o.. ai//er M C., O� Development Regulations •®' Used For Project Mitigation: The proposal will be subject to the City's Environmental Ordinance,Zoning Code, Subdivision Ordinance,Public Works Standard's,etc.These adopted codes and �,'N row standards will function to mitigate project impacts. NOTICE OF APPLICATION Proposed Mitigation Measures Used for Project Mitigation: AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF The following Mitigation Measures will likely be imposed on the proposed project. These recommended Mitigation Measures address project impacts not covered by existing codes and regulations as cited above. NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (DNS-M) 1.Traffic Mitigation Fee•$75.00 per new average daily trip attributed to the proposal. 2.Fire Mitigation Fee-$0.52 per new square foot of new construction. DATE November 8,1999 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-99-105,ECF,SA-H Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Mr.Peter Rosen,Project Manager,Development Services Division,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 913055,by 5:00 PM on November 28,1999.This matter is also APPLICATION NAME: PACIFIC GULF PROPERTIES scheduled for a public hearing on January 11,2000 at 9:00 AM,Council Chambers,Seventh Floor,Renton City Hall,1055 South Grady Way,Renton.If you are interested in attending the hearing,please contact the Development Servces PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Proposal to construct a 106,752 sq.ft.warehouse/office budding. The building footprint Division(425)430-7282,to ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled.If comments cannot be submitted in gwriting by the date indicated above,you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments on the proposal before would be approximately r recessed sq.ft.with an additional 8,000 sq.sft of mezzanine. The front of the buildingbuilding Lind the Hearing Examiner.If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive Ave.SW would have four areas of loading docks and glass-front office entries.The back of the would additional information by mail,please contact the project manager.Anyone who submits written comments*II have is loading access. Access is proposed via three(3)drives off Lind Ave.SW.The north access is an existing driveway to be used in common automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. with Frwest Steel and the south access is the existing back exit for the Act III Theaters. The proposal would construct CONTACT PERSON: PETER ROSEN(425)430-7279 one additional driveway cut in the center of the site frontage.The site plan includes 234 parking spaces. I A wetland area that was created for mitigation for the Home Base and Act III Theater projects is located on the east part of I PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION the site.The proposal maintains a 25-foot undisturbed buffer width from the wetland edge. PROJECT LOCATION: 3600 and 3800 Lind Avenue SW OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED(DNS-M):As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has detrmned that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project.Therefore,as permitted under the RCW 43.21 C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS(M)process to give notice that a DNS- M is likely to be issued.Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment -r period.There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance ,,,� � —i, •1 • I = ■1 Mitigated(DNS-M).A 14 day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. November 3,1999 ~ I ,,� PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: 1 III1« I SNOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: November 8.1999 permits/Review Requested: Environmental Checklist Review(ECF);Site Plan Approval(SA-H) NI • Other Permits which may be required: Construction and Building Permits Geotechnical Study,Preliminary Stone Drainage Report,Wetland Report II Ls Requested Studies: pt.., SVEn 1■ kr Location where application may - L-- be reviewed: 1055 South Grad Way,Works,Division,Development Services Department, �?J --. NM 1I , a 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 / .,‘,,Iola PUBLIC HEARING: Publicr hearing scheduled Red foron Tuesday,January 11,200 before thet :00 n I �'II - Hearing Examiner in Renton Council Chambers.Hearings begin at 9:00 AM on iii the 7N floor of the new Renton City Hall located at 1055 Grady Way South. — a 0 __ r om CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: �, I p .. Analytical process /�� a. A' Project ,consistencym refers toi a pla whether project is consistent with adoptedprovides that the INoI Notice of Appl cal regulations, (NOA)include • _�� j their absence,comprehensive plan policies.RCW 36.708. p `��� a statement of the preliminary determination of a project's consistency with the type of land use,level of development, infrastructure,and character of development if one has been made at the time of notice.Ate minimum,every NOA shall include a determination of the project's consistency with the zoning,comprehensive plan and development regulations. — The project site is zoned Medium Industrial(IM).Warehousing,offices and light Land Use: industrial uses are allowed in the IM zone.The proposal is consistent with the development standards of the IM zone. Environmental Documents that Environmental Checklist Evaluate the Proposed Project: miner mewl CERTIFICATION I, jesstcA r C)& , hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document were posted by me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on ► j '9 McKi Signed: _ _ ATTEST: Subcribed and sworn before me, a Nortary Public, u.and the State of Washington residing iii—R ,, , on the Z„ day of /4g NOT YN. �McHE�F ` - �,(� STATE UFR ASHI BL IC __ � Q��(/ �l �''''� COMMtSSIO 0�1 �� N EXPIRES MARILYN KAMCHEFF JUNE 29r 20©3 MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES:6-29-03 , iY G� O� A NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (DNS-M) DATE: November 8,1999 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-99-105,ECF,SA-H APPLICATION NAME: PACIFIC GULF PROPERTIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Proposal to construct a 106,752 sq. ft. warehouse/office building. The building footprint would be approximately 98,752 sq.ft.with an additional 8,000 sq.ft.of mezzanine. The front of the building facing Lind Ave.SW would have four recessed areas of loading docks and glass-front office entries. The back of the building would have on-grade loading access. Access is proposed via three(3)drives off Lind Ave.SW. The north access is an existing driveway to be used in common with Farwest Steel and the south access is the existing back exit for the Act III Theaters. The proposal would construct one additional driveway cut in the center of the site frontage. The site plan includes 234 parking spaces. A wetland area that was created for mitigation for the Home Base and Act III Theater projects is located on the east part of the site. The proposal maintains a 25-foot undisturbed buffer width from the wetland edge. c PROJECT LOCATION: 3600 and 3800 Lind Avenue SW r OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED(DNS-M): As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore,as permitted under the RCW 43.21 C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS(M)process to give notice that a DNS- M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated(DNS-M). A 14 day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: November 3,1999 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: November 8, 1999 ?ermits/Review Requested: Environmental Checklist Review(ECF);Site Plan Approval(SA-H) Dther Permits which may be required: Construction and Building Permits Requested Studies: Geotechnical Study,Preliminary Storm Drainage Report,Wetland Report .ocation where application may re reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 'UBLIC HEARING: Public hearing scheduled for Tuesday,January 11,2000 before the Renton Hearing Examiner in Renton Council Chambers. Hearings begin at 9:00 AM on the 7th floor of the new Renton City Hall located at 1055 Grady Way South. :ONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: analytical process 'roject consistency refers to whether a project is consistent with adopted and applicable development regulations,or in ieir absence,comprehensive plan policies. RCW 36.70B.110(2)(g)provides that the Notice of Application(NOA)include statement of the preliminary determination of a project's consistency with the type of land use,level of development, ifrastructure,and character of development if one has been made at the time of notice. At a minimum,every NOA shall Iclude a determination of the project's consistency with the zoning,comprehensive plan and development regulations. and Use: The project site is zoned Medium Industrial(IM). Warehousing,offices and light industrial uses are allowed in the IM zone. The proposal is consistent with the development standards of the IM zone. nvironmental Documents that Environmental Checklist valuate the Proposed Project: ailout • Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: The proposal will be subject to the City's Environmental Ordinance,Zoning Code, Subdivision Ordinance,Public Works Standard's,etc. These adopted codes and standards will function to mitigate project impacts. Proposed Mitigation Measures Used for Project Mitigation: The following Mitigation Measures will likely be imposed on the proposed project. These recommended Mitigation Measures address project impacts not covered by existing codes and regulations as cited above. 1.Traffic Mitigation Fee-$75.00 per new average daily trip attributed to the proposal. 2.Fire Mitigation Fee-$0.52 per new square foot of new construction. Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Mr.Peter Rosen,Project Manager,Development Services Division,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on November 26,1999. This matter is also scheduled for a public hearing on January 11,2000 at 9:00 AM,Council Chambers,Seventh Floor,Renton City Hall,1055 South Grady Way,Renton. If you are interested in attending the hearing,please contact the Development Services Division,(425)430-7282,to ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled. If comments cannot be submitted in writing by the date indicated above,you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments on the proposal before the Hearing Examiner. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional information by mail,please contact the project manager. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: PETER ROSEN (425)430-7219 PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION Hii. '1 I Iii t in i Ali 1 . -.._. :;: 7 L-AfiL,_-_4, ---t-,- / oc .0Ali 91 „.. A ' 1:.o rr _ ,,Adril as"nem .II-,.. I , _ I i I am 1.1... . AN% NEIGHBORHOOD DETAIL MAP— ,.c..«....wa.... mailout •• ,. i .. RCITY OF RENTON r. ;r ask Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator November 8, 1999 Mr. Barton Treece, Jr. Treece & Company, Inc. 320 2nd Avenue South Kirkland, WA 98033 SUBJECT: Pacific Gulf Properties LUA99-105,SA-H,ECF Dear Mr. Treece: The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on December 7, 1999. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. The date of Tuesday, January 11, 2000, at 9:00 AM, has been set for a public hearing to review the proposed Site Plan Approval. The hearing, before Mr. Fred Kaufman, Renton Hearing Examiner, will be held in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you one week before the hearing. Please contact me, at(425)430-7219, if you have any questions. Sincerely, 0, ?cp u(z_10,_, ,it.,... Peter Rosen Project Manager cc: Powell-Orillia L.L.C./Owners acceptance 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, Washington 98055 CITY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION LAND USE PERMIT MASTER APPLICATION PROPERTY OWNER(S) PROJECT INFORMATION Note: I` there is more then one legal owner, pteese attach an additional notarized Master Application for each owner. PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: NAME: Powell-Orillia L.L.C. Pacific Gulf Warehouse PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION: ADDRESS: 737 Market Street 3600 & 3800 Lind Avenue Renton, WA KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): CITY: Kirkland, WA ZIP: 98033 125360 0062 04 125360 0065 01 TELEPHONE NUMBER: EXISTING LAND USE(S): 425-828-4444 Vacant APPLICANT (if ether; than owner? PROPOSED LAND USES: NAME: Barton G. Treece, Jr P.E. Office/Warehouse/Light Industrial COMPANY (if applicable): EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: Treece & Company, Inc. Employment Area - Valley ADDRESS: 320 2nd Avenue South PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): N/A • CITY: Kirkland, WA ZIP: 98033 EXISTING ZONING: Medium Industrial (IM) NN\NG TELEPHONE NUMBER: 4 -822-2577 e PROPOSED ZONING (if applice L°PM FNRkN�N 6ara-5) �� e 19-I o c�-i° 9 19g9 OIVtA0. N/A ,�� SITE AREA (SQ. FT. OR ACREAGE): ��++ ``f eO NAME: Same as applicant QeV `1 7.39 acres \\�� COMPANY (if applicable): PROJECT VALUE: $3,000,000.00 ADDRESS: IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? No CITY: ZIP: IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA? TELEPHONE NUMBER: No • ;:;.>:;:.:;;.::.: LEGAi,DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY {l ttach,separate sheefl n6cessary: Lots 2 and 3 of City of Renton Short Plat # LUA-97-159-SHPL according to the Short Plat recorded under King County Auditors File # 9805219013 TYPE Ole APPLICATION & FEES Check all a plicat.q P YPas that:aPPIY` City staff;will determine fees —ANNEXATION $ SUBDIVISION: _ COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT $ _ REZONE $ _ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ _ SPECIAL PERMIT $ _ SHORT PLAT $ _TEMPORARY PERMIT $ _TENTATIVE PLAT $ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ _ PRELIMINARY PLAT $ _' SITE PLAN APPROVAL t� $"ac 2O. OO _ FINAL PLAT $ _ GRADE & FILL PERMIT $ (NO. CU. YDS: ) PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ _ VARIANCE $ (FROM SECTION: ) _ PRELIMINARY _WAIVER $ FINAL _ WETLAND PERMIT $ ROUTINE VEGETATION — MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ BINDING SITE PLAN $ SHORELINE REVIEWS: _ SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ _ CONDITIONAL USE $ _ VARIANCE $ _ _ EXEMPTION $No Charge "ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ 'CQ•o 0 REVISION $ — AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I, (Print Name)1ins•64 Cy.//et44-drdeclare.that I am (please check one)_the owner of the property involved in this application, I'the authorized representative to act for the property ownet4p leesq tettach proof of authorization), and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted,`e,ic1 ell dis,true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. O_ -gS10N '',, A ri � ��/ / >=.. atgp6'�;v , ATTEST: Subscribed and swor to befor me, a Notary Public, in and �G/�tf r0✓I C� 7ri�cGi ./y t� *_ Is ,A. ; for the State of i,1�1ft-0i-4f�(&TDiding at (Nam of Owner/Representative) ; C� on the j day of Ua\� - 1s Alli� -,,:vk. ''ii,,,,,• ....xo�__ ignature of Owner/Re esentative) 'II °P yyA,N VV , 10 tS6f `\"`,,,-- (Signature of Notary Public) (This section to be completed by City Staff.) City File Number . ).O5 A AAD BSP ,CAPS CAP U CPA CU-A CU H 'C LLA MHP FPUD FP PP R ' RVMP .SA-A SHPL=A :I SHPI-H 'SP SM SME TP V-A V V-H .•W TOTAL FEES: $ 2 t z TOTAL POSTAGE PROVIDED: $ �f,2` � ' ,. MASTERAP.DOC REVISED 8/97 ML,L ♦/ tf POWELL DEVELOPMENT CO P0.Box 97070 Kirkland,WA 98083-9770 (425)828 i4 Fax(425)822-8297 July 19, 1999 Ms. Jennifer Henning CITY OF RENTON Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 RE: LOTS 2 AND 3 OF LOT 7 ORILLIA SUBDIVISION Dear Ms. Henning: By copy of this letter, I am hereby authorizing Bart Treece of Treece and Company to execute the City of Renton Application Forms on my behalf as Owner and Managing Member of Lot 2 and Lot 3 of Lot 7 for Powell-Orillia, Associates, L.L.C., a Washington Limited Liability Company. Should you have any questions, please give me a call at(425) 828-4444. Best personal regards, POWELL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY Peter W. Powell President PWP:jp cc: Bart Treece- Via Facsimile (425)822-8758 Lloyd W. Powell M.Oeter11999 corres10719-1*miler herning.doc david kehle architect PROJECT NARRATIVE PACIFIC GULF PROPERTIES — LIND AVENUE AND SW 39TH RENTON, WASHINGTON The project, being developed by Pacific Gulf Properties, is on lots 2 and 3 of a previous short plat of a Burlington Northern binding site plan. The site abuts the Home Base/Act III Theater with site access being acquired from Lind Avenue and the access drives on both north and south edges of the site. These two lots will either be consolidated or adjusted such that the lots will not bisect the building. Existing off-site improvements consist of a curb and gutter along Lind Avenue, curb, gutter and sidewalk along the south access road and curbing along the north access. The north access is in common with Farwest Steel and currently has a driveway cut at Lind Avenue. The southern access is a back exit for the Act Theater and there is a street cut at Lind Avenue. The proposed project will install a sidewalk along the frontage of Lind Avenue. The building footprint will be approximately 98,752 SF with an additional approximately 8,000 SF of mezzanines in three different areas. The building will be tilt-up concrete (painted), glass at office and mezzanine areas, with flat roof allowing for a 24' clear space inside. Loading docks will be in four recessed areas facing Lind Avenue with on grade access behind building. Office entries of glass also face Lind Avenue with two rows of parking in front. There are no specific tenants or uses at this time but warehousing, office and light industrial uses are anticipated. The project site includes a wetland created as a part of the Home Base project. This area is left untouched including its buffer. Detention facilities along with grass lined swales are planned for storm water and water quality with design to meet City standards. Utilities are available and will be extended to the building as required. The building will be sprinklered throughout with an on-site looped fire main. Fire Prevention: Our preliminary design indicates a looped fire main with fire hydrants. The building will be sprinklered for fire protection. Subsequent tenant improvements will be applied for separately as well as any high rack permits. Water: Please reference comments on fire prevention above for looped water system description. There is an existing fire hydrant in the northwest corner of the property along Lind Avenue. Additionally, three hydrants are to be installed with construction. Sanitary Sewer: Sanitary sewer service will be provided to an existing sanitary sewer stub-out in Lind Avenue. DEVELOPMENT PLAN:",L'NG CITY OF RENTON JUL 221999 12720 GATEWAY DRIVE, SUITE 116 RECEIVED (206) 433-8997 SEATTLE, WA 98168 FAX (206) 246-8369 PROJECT NARRATIVE For: Pacific Gulf Page 2 Storm Water: We are including a preliminary storm drainage report, which addresses the requirements per the King County Surface Water Manual. Due to site configuration, we have elected to use two detention facilities connecting to two separate storm water stubs at Lind Avenue. In so doing, the storm water collected from parking areas is less than one acre for each facility, hence, simplifying the construction and installation. Revisions to existing storm water facilities on Home Base is not anticipated. Traffic: Based upon the anticipated number of employees and trips, as well as the ITE data for Light Industrial facilities (the most similar use studied in ITE), trip generations will be as shown in the report prepared by The Transpo Group dated July 16, 1999. Parking: Calculation of maximum and minimum parking ratios yield the following: Maximum: Warehouse: 1/1500 SF x 64,052 SF = 50 Cars Office: 4.5/1000 SF x 42,700 SF = 192 Cars Total = 242 Cars Minimum: Warehouse: 1/1500 SF x 64,052 SF = 50 Cars Office: 3/1000 SF x 42,700 SF = 178 Cars Total = 178 Cars The proposal of 234 spaces falls within this range. During the review and approval process (site plan, and SEPA), building preload plan and application will be prepared and submitted for review and approvals. It is our intent to place a building preload after the SEPA appeal period and in the ensuing 4 to 6 weeks prepare, submit and receive necessary approvals and permit for foundation, building and site construction. We believe the information furnished is consistent with the submittal requirements for the requested permits and reviews. david kehle architect Z��o CONSTRUCTION MITIGATION DESCRIPTION PACIFIC GULF PROPERTIES — LIND AVENUE AND SW 39TH r •✓ . •v , RENTON, WASHINGTON O�/ Z',67 Pacific Gulf Properties would like to proceed in an expedited format to preload and then construct this project. With the submittal of the site plan approval documents and SEPA by July 15, 1999, we would anticipate submitting plans for the building preload permit in August 15, 1999, along with the building permit application on August 31, 1999. We anticipate SEPA, site plan approval and preload permitting to occur concurrently. The site grading and preload activity can then occur in August and early September with the preload placement being monitored and approved in October. At that time, excess preload material will be removed from the building area, spread on site as fill and construction of foundations and utilities will commence. It is anticipated that site paving could occur in November with final building shell construction completed in February of 2000. It is envisioned that construction, once begun, will be performed between the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. — or other hours as specified by City of Renton ordinances, six days per week. As with other facilities in the area either recently completed or under construction at this time, it is anticipated that the hauling and transportation routes will utilize the Valley Freeway/41st Street/Lind Avenue routes into the site and SW 34th/East Valley RoadNalley Freeway exits. During construction, minimization of dust, mud, noise and other noxious characteristics will be accomplished by the appropriate methods of sprinkling, washing wheels, street sweeping, all equipment is muffled and construction will proceed as expeditiously as possible so as to minimize the overall time frame. Transportation and traffic impacts are anticipated to be similar to impacts of nearby previously constructed sites. As always, the owners, contractors, and the engineer will work closely with City of Renton staff and building inspectors to address any anticipated problems in a speedy and efficient manner. 12720 GATEWAY DRIVE, SUITE 116 (206) 433-8997 SEATTLE, WA 98168 FAX (206) 246-8369 Transportation and Traffic Engineering PLANNING • DESIGN The Transpo Group July 16, 1999 TG: 99311.00 DEVELOPMENT PI-AN‘ CITY OF RENTON jut_ 2 2 1999 Mr. Bart Treece D Treece & Company RECEIVE 320 Second Avenue S, Suite 200 Kirkland, WA 98033 SUBJECT: PACIFIC GULF PROPERTIES BUILDING ON LIND AVENUE SW Dear Bart, The purpose of this letter is to provide some of the preliminary information relevant to the traffic analysis being conducted for the proposed Pacific Gulf Properties building on Lind Avenue SW at SW 39th Street. We are currently reviewing the scope of work with Neil Watts at the City of Renton, and hope to conduct the traffic analysis over the next several weeks, For your initial filing, this letter includes a brief description of the project and the trip generation for the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) checklist. Once we have completed the traffic study, we will coordinate through your office to submit the report to the City of Renton. Project Description The proposed project includes a new building of approximately 107,000 gross square feet. About 40 percent of the building space would be identified for office use, 30 percent for warehouse, and 30 percent for light industrial. The site is located east of Lind Avenue at SW 39th Street in Renton. Three access points are proposed for the site on Lind Avenue SW. The proposed north access would be shared with the existing access for Farwest Steel. The middle access would be a new driveway on Lind Avenue SW. The southern access would utilize the existing driveway for the East Valley Cinema site onto Lind Avenue at SW 39th Street. Trip Generation The trip generation estimate for the proposed building is based on trip generation rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers'(ITE) Trip Generation (6th Edition, 1997). Since the mix of uses in the building will vary between office, warehouse, and industrial uses, the trip generation reflects the projected amount of each. Trip generation was estimated for both daily and PM peak hour conditions, as shown in Table 1. The TRANSPO Group, Inc 11730 118th Avenue N.E.. Suite 600 Kirkland. Washington 98034-7120 FAX 425/825-8434 425/821-3665 Mr. Bart Treece The July 16, 1999 Transpo Page 2 Group Table 1.Trip Generation Summary for the Pacific Gulf Properties Building on Lind Avenue SW.1 Amount ITE Daily Daily PM Peak PM Peak Hour Trips 107,000 gsf Building (gsf) Trip Rate Trips Trip Rate Total In Out 40%Office Use 43,000 11.01 470 1.49 64 11 53 30%Warehouse Use 32,000 4.96 160 0.51 16 4 12 30% Industrial Uses 32,000 6.97 220 0.98 31 4 27 Totals 107,000 850 111 19 92 1. Trip rates from ITE's Trip Generation, 6th Edition(1997). Land Uses#710 for Office,#150 for Warehouse,#110 Industrial. As shown in Table 1, the proposed 107,000 gsf building would generation about 850 trips per weekday, with 111 occurring during the PM peak hour. The resulting in/out distribution at the site driveways would be 19 in and 92 out during the PM peak hour. I trust that the information included in this letter provides you the trip generation information needed for the initial SEPA checklist. Please call me if you have any questions related to the information included in this letter, or any aspect of the traffic study. Sincerely, The TRANSPO Group, Inc. 1 ill N/e/ti . Jeff L. Schramm Transportation Engineer \99V993111W PILETTE R 1.DOC ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST City of Renton Pacific Gulf Site Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.2IC RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your observation or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, of if a question does not apply to your proposal, write"do not know" or"does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal. or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of Checklist for Non project Proposals: Complete this checklist for non-project proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply".In Addition, complete the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions (Part D). For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project", "applicant", and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and r$,ep ieJarea,:., respectively. CITY OF RENTON Page 1 of 14 JUL 2 2 1999 RECEIVED A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proposed Project, if applicable: Pacific Gulf Warehouse 2. Name of applicant: Barton G. Treece, Jr., P.E. for Powell-Orilla (property owner) 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Contact: Barton Treece Treece& Company, Inc. 320 Second Ave. S. Kirkland, WA 98033 425- 822-2577 4. Date checklist prepared: July 14, 1999 5. Agency requesting checklist: Planning/Building/Public Works, City of Renton 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Construction commencing October, 1999 with completion scheduled for May, 2000. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. Lot Line Adjustment to delete lot line between Lots 2 & 3 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Site reconnaissance by B-Twelve and Associates (copy of report attached). 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. Lot Line Adjustmant 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. City of Renton-SEPA, site plan approval, Lot Line Adjustment building pre- load permit, grading and building permits. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. Construction of a 106,752 SF warehouse and office facility on a 7.39 acre site with parking stalls and related site civil and landscapiing improvement (see attached project narrative). Page 2 of 14 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Located in the southern portion of Renton in the Green River Valley; Lots 2 and 3 of the Pwell Short Plat B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (underline one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Maximum 1% c. What general types of soils are found on the site(for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. A soils report is provided as an attachment to this checklist. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No e. Describe the purpose, type and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. 25,000 cu.yds. of fill material to be imported to the site from local borrow pits. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Yes, soil erosion could occur in connection with the proposed development since the entire site, except the existing 70'buffer, would be stripped of vegetation. Even though the site is flat, erosion could occur during rain and/or wind storms that occur during the construction phase of the project. To minimize this potential for soil erosion, site preparation techniques would include temporary detention ponds and filter fences to reduce the impact of water runoff on the surface soil. Landscaping will be placed on all surfaces not covered with impervious materials. No significant erosion is expected following project completion. Page 3 of 14 g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (e.g. asphalt and buildings)? Approximately 65 %coverage. Total Site Area: 321,987 sf Building Area: 98,752 sf (footprint) Paving Area: 111,523sf h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Erosion and sedimentation controls such as interceptor swales, straw bale barriers, silt fences and straw mulch for temporary erosion protection of exposed soils should be applied during construction. Stabilized construction entrances and wash pads should be installed at the beginning of construction and maintained for the duration of the project. All erosion and sedimentation control measures shall be installed and maintained in accordance with City of Renton requirements. 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e. dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Development of the site, as proposed, would not result in any significant impacts to existing air quality. The primary impact from development of the proposed project are related to construction activities and future vehicle traffic. Dust generated from grading and construction vehicle activity would be a temporary nuisance in the general area, and will be controlled by appropriate pallitive measures. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to the air, if any: Transportation of materials on local streets would be controlled to minimize congestion during peak travel times. This would minimize secondary air quality impacts caused by reduced travel speeds. Dust produced by construction can be reduced by using a number of techniques. Areas of exposed soils such as storage yards could be sprayed with water, oils, or chemical dust suppressants. Areas that might be exposed for prolonged periods of time should be covered with suitable groundcover to prevent wind erosion. Materials carried out of the construction area by trucks could be minimized by; use of a sawdust mat as a transition zone from the construction site; wheel washing; washing or brushing truck undercarriages; and covering dusty truck loads. For soils that do escape the construction site on trucks, a daily street cleaning program for truck routes would help to minimize dust. Page 4of14 3. WATER a. Surface Water: 1. Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, or wetlands?) If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Yes, wetlands/ detention areas and their buffers, constructed with the Act III and HomeBase projects, exist in the easterly 70' of this site. 2. Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Yes, however all activities will be out side of existing buffers. 3. Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material, if from on site. Does not apply. 4. Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. The proposed project will not require the withdrawal of surface water. However, surface water drainage will he conveyed to the storm drain system in Lind Ave. SW, west of the project site. Surface water runoff will be directed to onsite water quality and detention facilities. 5. Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. According to the City of Renton Community Profile, 1989, the site of the proposed project is not within either the 100-year floodplain or floodway. The FEMA floodplain maps for the City of Renton depict the project site as being outside of the 100-year floodplain as well. 6. Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No waste material from the site would enter the City's storm drain or sanitary sewer collection system. Based on the preliminary grading and utility plans for the project, all surface water runoff would be collected from paved areas and roof tops by storm drains and directed to on-site water quality facilities. Page 5 of 14 b. Ground Water: 1. Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No 2. Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals: toxic or nontoxic; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Not Applicable c. Water Runoff(including storm water) 1. Describe the source of runoff(including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Future construction of buildings and site improvements would cover up to 65%of the site with impervious surfaces. This would result in strorm water runoff that would drain to the Springbrook Creek, which flows back into the Black River. 2. Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Surface water could be contaminated by runoff containing oil or gas from parked cars on the parking lot and streets servicing the proposal. However, surface water runoff will be directed into on-site water quality facilities. 3. Proposed measures to recuce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: On-site storm drainage and wate quality/detention capabilities. 4. PLANTS A. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs X grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation Page 6 of 14 B. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? All of the grasses and weeds on site except in the 70' buffer would be removed during the grading phase of construction. C. List threatened or endangered species know to be on or near the site. None known D. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: All new landscaping and irrigation systems would be installed per the requirements of the City of Renton landscaping ordinance. 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: crows& seagulls mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other : rodents fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: none b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None Known c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. None Known d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None proposed 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil,wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electricity-Lighting, HVAC, Natural Gas-heating b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: For the Pacific Gulf facility, energy conservation would consist of an insulated building envelope, HVAC with economizers, energy efficient light .fixtures. The State of Washington has adopted model conservation standards for new commercial buildings, and as the City of Renton has adopted these standards, this development would be consistent with these model standards. Page 7 of 14 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. None to our knowledge. 1. Describe special emergency services that might be required. Fire, Police and Ambulance services consistent with similar uses. No special services are required. 2. Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental hazards, if any: None required. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Traffic from SR 167 and local aterial(s) can be heard from the site, but would not affect proposal. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short time or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short Term - Construction related(6 months) 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. Long Term -Normal commercial traffic associated with a of/Icefwarehouse facility; daily 7:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., 5 days a week 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Mufflers on construction equipment during the construction period. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Site is vacant. Adjacent is a HomeBase Warehouse store, Act III Theatre and U.S. Rentals facility; surrounding sites are commercial and office uses. Page8of14 b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No c. Describe any structures on the site. None d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? IM f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Employment Area- Valley g. If applicable,what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Does not apply h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 5-200 employees would work in the completed project. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Not Applicable 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The proposed project is a concrete tilt wall building that is similar in size, design and scale to the other industrial, warehouse, and commercial buildings Page 9 of 14 in the vicinity of the site. The type of use proposed is also consistent with land uses adjacent to the site and in the surrounding area. 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None b. Approximately how many units, if any,would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Not Applicable 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? Maximum building height would be 30 feet at the roof ridge. Principle exterior material would be painted concrete tilt walls and glass. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Appearance of the site would change from a vacant and undeveloped area to an urban use. Views from adjacent commercial and industrial uses toward the site would change from vacant fields to views of commercial uses with parking lots. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: A landscaping strip along the public right-of-way, interior parking lot landscaping, as required, and perimeter landscaping consisting of a variety of trees,shrubs, and gound cover are proposed. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Exterior lighting for the improvements resulting from the proposed development would consist of wall lighting,parking lot lighting, with non- glare fixtures, and some signage. Any glare that may occur would happen at night. Page 10 of 14 b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No safety hazards from lighting would occur. The proposed landscaping along Lind Avenue could be designed to minimize glare from headlights on adjacent properties. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None to our knowledge d. Proposed measure to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: All outdoor lighting would be shielded and directed downward or upward so as to minimize potential intrusion on neighboring properties. 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Act III Theatre Complex on nearby site. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. None to our Knowledge b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. Not Applicable C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Not Applicable Page 11 of 14 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The proposed project is located on a vacant site that fronts Lind Avenue 510±feet south of SW 34th Street. The East Valley Freeway (SR 167) parallels East Valley Road two blocks to the east. The closest freeway interchange is located at SW 41st Street where freeway southbound on-and off-ramps are available. Northbound on-and off-ramps for SR 167 are located at SW 43rd Street. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Transit routes 153, 163 and 247 on Lind Avenue are accessed at the existing stop on the site frontage. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? 234+stalls-none eliminated d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). Sidewalks will be installed along the project frontage on Lind Avenue e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of)water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Approximately 850 ADT-generally7-9 a.m. and 3-5 p.m., please see enclosed report by the Transpo Group. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Impact Fees: The City of Renton has recently adopted an Impact Fee Program. As mitigation for a project's impact to the area transportaion system, the City of Renton requires an impact fee to help fund future capacity improvements within the City. Page 12 of 14 Local Off-Site Improvement: No local off-site improvements are recommended. Since the project does not degrade the level of service at any study area intersection for 1996 conditions, specific roadway improvements are not required. Frontage Improvement: Sidewalks will be provided along Lind Avenue. Transportation Management: Sidewalks will be provided along Lind Avenue consistent with City of Renton requirements. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No, however, the new development would require police and fire department services, as with similar type developments. The impact on schools and health services would be minimal since most new employees are expected to be hired form the local labor pool. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, If any. Not applicable 16. UTILITIES a Underline utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, waters refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Sewer: City of Renton Telephone: GTE NW Water: City of Renton Power and gas: Puget Sound Energy Refuse Service: Waste Management Page 13 of 14 C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Signature: Name Printed: Barton G. Treece, Jr., PE. Date Submitted: 7.t� • t). Page 14 of 14 11 POWELL DEVELOPMENT CO P.O. Box 97070 Kirkland,WA 98083-9770 (425) 828-4444 Fax(425) 822-8297 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING July 19, 1999 CITY OF RENTON JUL 20 1999 RECEIVED Ms. Jennifer Henning CITY OF RENTON Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 RE: LOTS 2 AND 3 OF LOT 7 ORILLIA SUBDIVISION Dear Ms. Henning: By copy of this letter, I am hereby authorizing Bart Treece of Treece and Company to execute the City of Renton Application Forms on my behalf as Owner and Managing Member of Lot 2 and Lot 3 of Lot 7 for Powell-Orillia, Associates, L.L.C., a Washington Limited Liability Company. Should you have any questions, please give me a call at (425) 828-4444. Best personal regards, POWELL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY Peter W. Powell President PWP:jp cc: Bart Treece - Via Facsimile (425) 822-8758 °k l i'3G �►" 7/i 9/9 9 Lloyd W. Powell M.:Ipeter11999 corres10719-1 jennifer henning.doc lauinkk. B-twelve Associates, Inc. 1103 W.Meeker St. (v)253-859-0515 Suite C (f)253-852-4732 Kent,WA 98032-5751 (e)info@b12assoc.com November 3, 1999 Mr. Peter Powell Powell Development Company 737 Market Street Kirkland, Washington 98033 vC4opM RE: Pacific Gulf Property - Wetland Delineation ' R T��—1Ai Wetland Mitigation area ���►i 0,y TON ��NG B-twelve Job#96-174 RED199,9 Dear Peter, 0 On September 23, 1999, I visited the mitigation project abutting the Pacific Gulf Property, located immediately behind the Home Base and the Theatre. I observed that all wetlands within this mitigation area are contained within, and to the east of the berm that is on the west side of the mitigation area. I delineated the edge of these wetlands using the methodology described in the Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual (WADOE, March 1997). This is the methodology currently recognized by the City of Renton and the State of Washington for wetland determinations and delineations. The wetland area identified would also be considered a wetland using the methodology described in the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (Environmental Laboratory, 1987), as required by the US Army Corps of Engineers. The wetland within the mitigation area is in two distinct areas separated by a berm oriented in an east-west position. The area on the north side of this east-west berm was delineated with pink flagging labeled A 1-A 12, and south of the berm, B1-B6. These flags were subsequently surveyed and plotted on the site plan by Horton Dennis & Associates, Inc. (see attached plan). If you have any questions or require additional information please feel free to contact me at (253) 859-0515 or at ed@b12assoc.com. Sincerely, B-twelve Associates, Inc. Ed Sewall Senior Wetland Ecologist File:Ed/96174-08.doc t -_______ RFNCHN ARK • ' • v SET BY OTHERS CENTER BOLT,FIRE HYDRANT SSMH -` `�'LA, EAST SIDE OF UNO AVE.S., 55MH 500'3 SOUTH OF S.W.34TH ST. Rue-17.11 _e'D 1 ELEVAi10N-19.44' CTR.FLOYAINE(W,S,EN)-6.61 I ' SIDE'WAIJI _51)MH p, - CURB • A. RIN-16.52 I.E.I2'CONC.(E)-9.32 , 0. ` _R I.E.12 PVC(9)-9.52 x' SOLO IW*1,STRIPE 0617 I.E.16Pvc(W)-9.52 "I • `_ p • I 1e w CURB - -• I�i a FHn _--� "� - ,1_= CURE!(AMER• j SET BY OTHERS cl / I _� w i - FIRE HYDRANT / \ HLB 16.8[ ASPHALT ELEVATION-20.16' ( I I / ,� IIII 3 -' '� ASPHALT / CURB!GUTTER I �� � II ; 16'W \ 4 li • I -T7-- _T �/6 W . 2-F 11..,L. •ELEC. 18'W I I TRAFFIC 5 IELNH / I R\R�\ \rslcl �\ j QTv oNm --il-/-_ ES,20'RAILROAD R/W I I--\\ 1 92063027 2�' - • 7., B C. C I SANITARY SEWER 20'UTILITY EMIT \ I 'I, / 36,729 salt. SET I 1 \ REC.N0.9208302896 :N 1 (-1.- O.x acres 'HC BUILDING lilt re STUB-OUT \\\\]]]] 7920 SETBACK UNE 1, \ 1-STORY V I UNO AVENUE SW (TYPICAL) tl I lil \ CONCRETE / BUILDING 46F0G � I I � I ./I S I �il I.E.12•PVV(SWl-I3.59 pp mewl I RIN-15.33 '- ,� m -DIRT I RI 15"PNC(SE,NW)-10.25 -17 I, •I (1� SOAR 31 ( / I.E.12-PVC((NE)-9.90 RR - 30'INGRESS,EGRESS t UIUJTY JI > I.E.18PVC(E)-9.80 'II I SNITCH ESN'T TO FAROEST STEEL CORP. I ,t LE 12'PVC((''AA)� 9.85 ( ■ ••i5u REC.NO.9603291895• 1�,� LE 12•CONC.(W)-9.54 I , 'vL / REC.NO.9607030996 I � _( 20.00'WIDE RAILROAD EASEMENT 24'BUILDING SETBACK me �'s/..‘, / C 11 I I '�� 1(I K C R N 6110210541 PO/REC.NO.6105040070 , I n /^.. /�� ) :I\\I PI 4. / p. J i. jai I I I ■ `t I II / I I /�/ P40 I I 11 1 ■. \\( 20.00'SIDE UTILItt EASEMENT ON� III I I 1 .. /�/SET PK NMI G� I 1 UI, II III 11� L I bAD 11 in I I J 'BOA 2334: I 11 ym{i I I `( \\ SDNM'A' \`�\� I I / I ti h r 1 `\ I 71 RIM 12'CONC.I 1/ 1 / \ / I �Nr I.E.1YCONC.(ESE)-15.74 •1 1' I/I ( I r/ \ 1 I ` LE 1YCONF(SSE)-13.52 I.E 12"CONC.I IH III v / I 'pA I3345'W�AC \\\/�/ I \ \\ I.E RESTRICT(OR-PULE'-10.92 I 12.94 1 • I \ Low EL.-16 I I 1. 1. .54'35"E(V. ,�\ \ 20'URUT'(ESM'T 1 \ 1 \ \ SDNH'B' 1(n I J t1,00-"' ) • REC.NO.y063026961 \ SOl1D UD-IBAa II I , 2'DdC' __\-_Vase,.//--1 // \ I, \ \\ I.E t2'P NE)-12x I ( P f 01'50'09' -_� \ 20'UTILITY ESM'T , \ - I( \\ Y\ \ 1 I� _ "'--'�"'f-/--r--`c%t7_/ I REC.NO.9206302696\ \ I ICI \\\� \\ - g' I I rd:TO I ( f./t' _ II REC.NO.511D o 0541 \ I IIIII ;\\\ \ NI I N. I/// „1 DMfl'a' 1� \, I ! � \\\\ \ WATER�l1AUT'r POND SDNH I 1 )I I III I I I I ___ /soNH"A- \ Y I ' `` \ \ RIN-17.75 II 111 I -'/ s I 1 `\" \\`• \ I.E 151PVC(NENW)-10.65 \� 'I I I m I I g I I Il - .;� \� \ \ `\ I I I 3 i t ill 3 I I III n_ :\(��� �\\\ OJ)/) \ `\ T I I I I till g 1111 a I I�, \\\• ��i/ \\ I 'I I ram. II II ailnn 3 nnI `__ _, _ . .11I11 lin lbw�'\ �\ IIIIII lull _ �-- ► I 1 r w,,Riitro r. ir Li I ■ \\\ LE.CAPPED 6•PVC(51-15.57 SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE Y \ r ■ ;`I\ PARCEL A The undersigned,a land surveyor,duly registered and licensed In the State of Woshingt I I \ Properties,Inc.,Powell-Orlllia LLC.. a Washington Limited Liability Company, TronsnatiorPON.l �,SEDIMENTSEDIMENT I I I \ ASPHALT SP 378-79 respective successors and assigns that: II(I) This land survey plat hoe been prepared based upon field work conducted.E 12"GONG.-,a.J6 A\ IE.12"CONC...15.70 ' 1U, 16 (II) The description of the property shown hereon corresponds to the boundarll I.E.CAPPED 6-PVC(N)-14.13 II 1\ /RHO.REBAR•CAP such description doses by engineering calculation; II \ (BI) The survey plat correctly show*the locotIone and dimensions of all Improve 1' flood plains,waterways,bodies of cote', fences.easements,rights-of-way,above-grow I I(/__ curbs,gutters,driveways,curb cuts, traveled ways,above-ground or otherwise apparent 1 items,located on,or appurtenant to,or affecting the subject property,that are of rec / or otherwise known to me; (Iv) All Information shown hereon Is true,correct,and complete; (v) The subject property contains 321,987 square feet,7.39 acres, and no sl LEGEND WATER OUAUTY POND n (vi) Ingress to and egress from the subject property Is provided by Lind Aver, public right-of-way maintained by the City of Renton; (vil) No portion of the property shown hereon Ilea within the 100-year flood ply a PAD MOUNTED TRANSFORMER a sl BURIED POWER MARKER 0. hazards as designated by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, the United State Development,or the Flood Insurance Administration. Reference: F.E.M.A.Map No.5303 0 UCUTY JUNCTION BOX 0 CATCH BASIN (nil) No improvements upon or adjacent to the property(or under me property BM•CAP 0 MANHOLE -EL SIGN e upon physical inspectionand without excavation)l constitute or ore subject to enn heremMRAY,1999 0 HANOHOLE )� UGHT STANDARD electric transformer and possible burled power lines)to or from it as shown hereon; -{ LAD ` y -1 STREET LIGHT ASSEMBLY 0 DECIDUOUS TREE (ix) No covenants,restrictions,or easements that are of record,discoverable to me have been violated in any respect. a--1Y-- TRAFFIC SIGNAL POLE N M N FENCE LINE 0 (3) This map or plot and the survey on which It is based were made(I)In c RAILROAD CROSSING GATE C BURIED GAS UNE Requirements for ALTA/AGSM Land Title Surveys,"jointly established and adopted by Al a-A+ RAILROAD CROSSING UOITS W BURIED WATER UNE 4,6, 7(a),7(b)(1), 7(b)(2), 8 through 11 and 13 of Table A thereof,and pursuant to c and AGSM and In effect on the date of this Certification)of an Urban Survey,and alas I T I TELEPHONE VAULT SD STORM DRAINAGE UNE • OII applicable laws. �t /y///p' O TELEPHONE RISER 59 SANITARY SEWER LINE h ,i?/h/q7 i' ® STORM DRAIN MANHOLE - P BURIED POWER USE �tf FRegb4trattlae o ve C w sure 5/21/99 A nlsµ1lawe .w ft., (I •••levees soma -40' A.L.T.A. SURVEY 9915.00 soma ow..e. ALJMLH sY no ADDED WETLAND AREAS A•B pe..__Lk___. ) OF 1 w[atm PRC rnmoL REV I I ON CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: June 4, 1999 TO: Jennifer Toth Henninger DEVELOPMENT PL/',pt;!;;,;G FROM: Arneta Henninger X7298 CITY OF RENTON SUBJECT: PACIFIC GULF WAREHOUSE JUL 2 2 1999 PREAPPLICATION RECEIVED East side of Lind Av SW at SW 39th St I have reviewed the preliminary application for this proposed warehouse generally located in Section 31-23N-5E and have the following comments: SEWER: • This project is not located in the Aquifer Protection Zone. • There is an 8" sanitary sewer main in Lind Av SW. • A sanitary sewer main extension will not be required for this project. • Any use in the building subject to oils or grease shall require the installation of a grease interceptor or oil/water separator as determined at the time of plan review. • If a fire sprinkler system is required then the floor drains are to be tightlined to the sanitary sewer system. C Sim • System Development Charges (SDC) are $0.078 per square foot These fees are collected at the time a construction permit is issued. WATER: • CiG. • The site is not located in the Aquifer Protection Zone. • The project site is located in the 196 Pressure Zone. • There is an existing 16" watermain in Lind Av SW. • Per the City of Renton Fire Marshall the preliminary fire flow is 4,000 GPM. The City Code states when the fire flows exceed 2,500 GPM, the fire hydrants shall be served by a main which loops around the building or complex of buildings and reconnects back into a distribution supply main. • PACIFIC GULF WAREHOUSE PREAPPLICAT June 9, 1999 Page 2 of 3 • A watermain extension will be required for this project. The size of this new watermain will be a minimum 8" in diameter, possibly a 10" dependent on the location and number of required fire hydrants. This new main shall be connected to the existing 16" watermain in Lind Av SW. • Any new construction must have a fire hydrant capable of delivering a minimum of 1,000 GPM and shall be located within 150 feet of the structure. This distance is measured along the travel route. Additional fire hydrants may be required to be installed as a part of this project to meet this criteria. • Water System Development Charges o $0.113 per square foot gro s area may be required if not previously paid. The De lopment Charges are coil ted as part of the construction permit. STREET IMPROVEMENTS: • This project will be required to install a six (6) foot sidewalk adjacent to the property line c and a six (6) foot minimum planter strip located between the sidewalk and curb on Lind Av SW. • The Transportation Mitigation Fee is $75 per daily trip generated.fr DRAINAGE: • A conceptual drainage plan and report is required with the formal application for the project. A content list for drainage report for conceptual drainage plan is attached. • There are storm drainage facilities in Lind Av SW. • All storm drainage plans shall be designed in accordance with the 1990 King County Surface Water Drainage Manual. • If there is 5,000 square feet or more of new impervious area subject to vehicular use (referring to the parking lot), a Biofiltration Swale is required. Detention may be required, depending on the calculations for the site development. • The Surface Water SDC fees of $0.129 (but not less than $385) per square foot of new impervious area may be required if not previously paid. GENERAL: • All required utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed Civil Engineer. • Permit application must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. The fee for review and inspection of these improvement is 5% of the first $100,000 of the estimated construction costs; 4% of anything over $100,000 but • PACIFIC GULF WAREHOUSE PREAPPLICAT June 9, 1999 Page 3 of 3 less than $200,000, and 3% of anything over $200,000. Half of the fee must be paid upon application for building and construction permits, and the remainder when the permits are issued. There may be additional fees for water service related expenses. See Drafting Standards. PGPA CITY OF RENTON ‘rcY °� FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU -p- MEMORANDUM L�'NTO DATE: June 3, 1999 TO: Jennifer Toth Henning, Principal Planner FROM: Corey Thomas, Plans Review Inspector SUBJECT: Preliminary Comments for Pacific Gulf Warehouse 1. The preliminary fire flow required is 4,000 gpm. Four fire hydrants are required. One fire hydrant is required within 150-feet of the proposed structure and three fire hydrants are required within 300-feet of the structure. A looped water main is required to be installed around the building. - 2. The fire mitigation fees are applicable at the rate of $0.52 per square foot of building: 106,529 square feet x $0.52 = $55,395.08 This fee is payable at the time of building permit issuance. 3. An approved fire sprinkler system is required to be installed throughout the structure. 4. An approved fire alarm system is required to be inst Iled throughout the structure. Veituio U Sr -o; Vo us, 4 5 �Ftcu, 5 i : 5. Fire department apparatus access appears adequate with the exception of turning radius near the southwest and southeast corners of the building. Inside turning radius is required to be 25-feet minimum. CT:ct pacgulf RECEIVED MAY 2 8 1999 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT. NEIGHBORHOODS AND STRATEGIC PLANNING MEMORANDUM DATE: ,j—2e_ f TO: Long Range Planning FROM: Jana Hanson, Development Services Division Director SUBJECT: New Preliminary Application: 12C(1(4( 664) LOCATION: -EG�S1�1cc✓ ),P A-v.e rs i , - St,) S-- PREAPP NO. 91 `4(0 Please review the attached preliminary project plans for consistency with applicable Comprehensive Plan Policies. Please submitsubmIyour written comments to P(7)/()/t6)-/ no later than �7, . Thank you. We will not be able to include comments received after this date in the presentation/summary we prepare for the applicant. 9( ken 'Q 2n ft-) CG'/,19 j 6 -�, 'JL. P i,l41 - (el h t nreann CITY OF RENTON PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: June 10, 1999 TO: Pre-Application File No. 99-46 FROM: Jennifer Toth Henning SUBJECT: Pre-Application Comments for Pacific Gulf Warehouse General. We have completed a preliminary review of the pre-application materials for the above- referenced development proposal. The following comments on development and permitting issues are based on the pre-application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision makers (e.g.,Hearing Examiner,Zoning Administrator, Board of Adjustment, Board of Public Works, and City Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by City staff or made by the applicant. The applicant is encouraged to review all applicable sections of the Renton Municipal rz% Code. , • 0 As we understand the proposal, a 106,529 square foot(98,529 s.f footprint) warehouse/office building is proposed on a 7.4 acre site generally located at SW 39th Street and Lind Avenue SW. The parcel is presently vacant and is located west of the Home Base Site and Act III theaters. 1. Zoning The project site is zoned Medium Industry(IM). Warehouses are permitted as a primary use. Stand alone office uses are not permitted in the IM Zone. However, administrative headquarters are permitted in the IM Zone as a secondary use provided that the offices are associated with a primary permitted use on the same site or a contiguous site. The office uses may be developed in conjunction with, or subsequent to,the industrial use. The office uses may serve the administrative needs of employees company-wide including those employees located on other sites. 2. Development Standards. _ In the IM Zone,the minimum front yard setback from arterial streets is 20 feet. Lind Avenue,SW is considered to be an arterial street. The minimum amount of landscaping width required along arterial streets is 10%of the lot depth or 20 feet, whichever is less, but in no case less than 10 feet. In the Green River Valley, an additional 2%of the entire site must be landscaped with natural landscaping per the City's agreement with the US Soil Conservation Service. The areas should be aggregated in one portion of the property and should not be dispersed throughout the site. Where possible,the required 2%landscaping for adjacent properties should be contiguous. \\TS SERVER\SYS2\COMMON\\\TS SERVER\SYS2\COMMON\DIVISION.S\DEVELOP.SER\DEV&PLAN.INGVTH\pacglfdoc June 10, 1999 Page 2 Outdoor storage, garbage, refuse or dumpster areas must be screened by a fence, or landscaping, or a landscaped berm, or some combination thereof(as determined by the Zoning Administrator) in order to achieve adequate visual or acoustical screening. Special screening is required for truck operations and impoundment yards --that is,a 6 to 10 feet high solid wall or sight-obscuring fence is required. 2. Parking and Loading Warehouse use requires one parking stall for each 1,500 square feet of gross floor area(gsf). Office use requires a minimum of 3 parking stalls per 1,000 gsf minimum and 4.5 stalls per gsf maximum. Calculations of required parking were not accomplished by staff,without a breakdown of the building use. You should note that for purposes of calculating required parking, certain areas can be deducted such as wall thickness, corridors, restrooms, shafts, lobbies and mechanical rooms. Standard parking stalls must be 9' x 20'. Compact stalls must be 8-1/2' x 16 feet. Compact stalls may be used for up to 30%of all use and 40%of designated employee use. An overhang of 2 feet is permitted, as long as the parking does not overhang into required landscaping. Wheel stops are required on the edge of parking lots. Vehicle circulation aisles must be 24 feet in width for two-way circulation. It appears that you will need to revise the parking lot to meet minimum standards. Loading docks are considered to be dock-high if they exceed 40-inches in height. Dock-high doors must have a minimum of 100 feet of clear area in front of the door for maneuvering. Grade level doors require a minimum of 45 feet of clear area in front of the door. ' ., 3. Environmental Review The project requires environmental review. A geotech study will be required. Since there are wetland and wetland buffer areas on the site, a current wetland delineation would be required with the project application. Environmental mitigation generally includes traffic mitigation fees, fire mitigation fees, stormwater conditions, erosion control measures. You should disclose the amount of grading anticipated and quantify this in cubic yards in both the project description and the checklist. 5. Site Plan Review. Site Plan Review is required. Since the proposal is greater than 25,000 s.f., a public hearing is held with the City's Hearing Examiner. The Examiner will consider horizontal and vertical arrangement of structures, circulation for pedestrians and vehicles, location of dumpsters, landscaping, light/glare, impacts to adjacent properties. 6. Schedule. The process for combined environmental/land use permits with a public hearing is approximately 12 weeks from the date of acceptance of a complete application. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS LAND USE PERMIT SUBMITTAL WAIVED MODIFIED REQUIREMENTS: BY: BY: COMMENTS: Calculations, Survey, Drainage Control Plan 2 Drainage Report 2 Elevations, Architectural AND 4 Elevations, Grading 2 Existing Covenants (Recorded Copy)4 Existing Easements (Recorded Copy) 4 Flood Plain Map, if applicable 4 Floor Plans a AND 4 Geotechnical Report z AND 3 Grading Plan, Conceptual 2 Grading Plan, Detailed 2 King County Assessor's Map Indicating Site Landscaping Plan, Conceptual,' Legal Description 4 List of Surrounding Property Owners 4 Mailing Labels for Property Owners 4 Map of Existing Site Conditions 4 Master Application Form 4 Monument Cards (one per monument) , Parking, Lot Coverage & Landscaping Analysis 4 Plan Reductions (PMTs) 4 Postage 4 Public Works Approval Letter 2 Title Report or Plat Certificate 4 Topography Map (5' contours)3 Traffic Study 2 Tree CuttingNegetation Clearing Plan 4 ) Utilities Plan, Generalized 2 '' Wetlands Delineation Map4 Wetlands Planting Plan 4 Wetlands Study 4 This requirement may be waived by: ���-tt 1. Property Services Section PROJECT NAME: Qd ktkC Lr PPOVLRUtS 2. Public Works Plan Review Section C� 3. Building Section DATE: 17_41 4. Development Planning Section h:\division.s\develop.ser\dev.plan.ing\waiver.xls **************************************************************** City of Renton WA Reprinted: 07/22/99 15 : 32 Receipt ******************************************************: .:******** Receipt Number: R9903540 Amount : 2 , 504 .29 07/22/99 15 : 32 Payment Method: CHECK Notation: 11955DAVIDKEHLE Init: CRP Project # : LUA99-105 Type: LUA Land Use Actions Parcel No: 125360-0065 Site Address : 3600 LIND AV SW Total Fees : 2 , 504 .29 This Payment 2 , 504 .29 Total ALL Pmts : 2 , 504 .29 Balance: . 00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 000 . 345 . 81 . 00 . 0007 Environmental Review 500 . 00 000 . 345 . 81 . 00 . 0017 Site Plan Approval 2 , 000 . 00 000 . 05 .519 . 90 .42 . 1 Postage 4 .29 -• G3 • 19T23N R5E W1/2 - SW 23rd Sty M r IH IH -cl IL W 7th St CA R SW 27th St , ` SW 27th St. J I ♦ / 1 I IM RC SW 29 h St ae w a i S6 Oth St. wz M H • N IH CA c AIL N ILi , - 167 34th St SW 34th St. • W 34th St. I IL L IH 70 co /. IL 6 I M- OSW 39th St. Q / u CA J - , IL 'S'vl 7 1MX�11tb1T 1st St. LM SW 41st St. CA1 C ' oi) . , 13 • 31 T23N R5E W 1/25 T o goo .00 _° ZONING 14600 c p'e'p"' AL SERVICES uam/9s 30 T23N R5E W 1/2 ZONING MAP BOOK • • as:r.raga�rc+,•„,, ►'alt.-.. e" ..1 ., 14.-:f-*.iiiirieisliiipiH::;;: : l' - r- 'iii. • kg____,_-._ trig 92. 15;1 93,' 455> calif 45 '�;"' 1 . I - ii'..;A:::.,..m ::if. v ,,..:„.:, 11:,141,..' 'co.; ..:40 ,,,,;,... ,,e14,.v.�odAn �tT -'' ie A ''� � °�� 26 T24tq R5E Pi,..:111111 iii:::iiiii::iii:::,i-:-:,].Eb:,.. ,, - ,,,_.!, ._.,.::,..:,,i,i,i,m,:, .4 . . . ,. 464 eigirA,1(1:1,4 it-1.2iiiiiiiiii r.r •• 6I :4- • .. c '7 � i 36 724N R4E (� M: -• RA,. ..N`41bE. t24N R5E : ',; 7 ,,, 4!fi•r•'7*Pri*, a-1.0"40„: I ,,,,,_ ,III 4i�'�:;:::�:;' J • �!�' ,1 '41'1'•"=.7 c: I ...,,,-1.4 c''.:. A 11.- 4 •�'Illli 307 :: 4E 08 tl. ,_ .• •_ .'fr Q , .J 1 rit t_ O\ ( i1' -:,„,:......, .:„ .• et t.;,,„..tr.;, -1 ��i� g_, I r i . IIM'YL`'f���� � �...zT23Nk5E 23,.tC I, ' < n , ��, rill 1110, :PAW '1%. i H.I� .,, 1 rill A. t ttiMhUtfik.x .,. .41.. V: ! I it 1 ... ‘..,41.;-.. , -0e. :!,:;,..iti,,,t, -re ,,,,,is-, IP !ill 4'iNi a Mil IY 5 -0x .' ---'-'. li T,2.3N�RSE :,, c A 14Et ?_,,, , 6'rAN,- i A't1�i 1 t r 70 ... : ., 81] ith.i E ... "►L�` '. '��V�°' 1•r' I 1G11f�' tIt. '��I UfirI� • Ek�l�l1 I I . XI( ,,, .'15 A iaookwiF, , .,,i,,_ Ok' 371 81,_ ION* ' 'ilig;int: --a", v:i r,4 -..vgi.a., Ll.cr-N --,: i, .4 . 4-4,,t,s, . ,-. ::,- --4,-- ft.,- A....=w ,_ ,3 T2 N R �r � RI �i�a�E��l . T23NVf5E ��``�Jhv ,��,22 T23N R5 23 T23N R5E e gin < EnicE �,I ©1 . i: !zt ;,TNR4. '. 1 —' — ' . d� ` z S R5E _ 26 23 1+ `• 1,�' i 1 `�_ I 511 � 6r0 I. .. —s�• 0:tirti.04 825;l — o . [..• ,, 7:. - l' .1 c.., ..: ...,, , :r '. Xy',. ---2 i �" 3b r3N°I(a T2 RSE ', a u3NIR5E ' 35 T23N 5E::�::: iii---:: .....in , 6011 i - 1 l•ANT(IER u. .. -- N.e'• IIII •(:).°1111111 FL IN ilf .0.4 833 mFyi!.!7.Tql___ 1, • 7774Iii IN �p�, {- _, '-te 22N R4E .r ••.I 6 T22 •5E 1 C .22N 4 SE 7_RSE ._\, 'c q—, li 2 T22N R5E - la KROLL ,P, Publicly Owned 1-1 Resource Conservation I—I Convenience Commi 1 ---- Renton City Limit! PAGE# n Residential 1 du/ac n Center Neighborhoo • n - Residential 5 du/ac I-7 Center Suburban —Adjacent City Limits en Residential 5 du/ac I—I Center Downtown r..1 (Grey Text) Prezones SECT/T. N/• f CDC Center Office Residential r�.; Automall District A ,` Residential Manufactured Homes a-a 1 .s ni Residential 10 du/ac n Commercial Arterial I•;•;•:I Automall District B r• R-ia Residential 14 du/ac Commercial Arterial Automall to PAGE o �6 N-i I Residential Multi-Family Infill n Commercial Office X INDEX w • Ian-NI Residential Multi-Family Neighborhood Center iM Industrial - Heavy a Z' ® Residential Multi-Family Suburban Center iM Industrial - Medium - -. RI ^ Industrial - Light N Residential Multi-Family Urban Center I I i Y I1 Public Use to a co t - ( ij) çi LANDAMERICA ,.t. " •Ad Title Commitment prepared for Mr. Lonnie P. Nadal Pacific Gulf Properties, Inc. Lind Avenue SW & SW 39th Street Renton, King County, WA File No 9918-0536 _\* N4G • \r‘J N4C C'04 °• t-Rvr *.i4" • • • • LonclAinerica Financial Group.Inc. 1200 Sixth At . Suite 1910 Seattle, WA 98101 Telephone 206-628-2822 800-232-8388 Facsimile 206-628-0631 If T COMMITMENT FOR ISSUED BY TITLE INSURANCE TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Transnation Transnation Title Insurance Company, an Arizona Corporation, herein called the Company, for a valuable consideration, hereby commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance, as identified in Schedule A, in favor of the proposed insured named in Schedule A, as owner or mortgagee of the estate or interest covered hereby in the land described or referred to in Schedule A, upon payment of the premiums and charges therefor; all subject to the exceptions and conditions and stipulations shown herein, the Exclusions from Coverage, the Schedule B exceptions, and the conditions and stipulations of the policy or policies requested. (See reverse side of this cover and inside of back cover for printed Exclusions from Coverage and Schedule B exceptions contained in various policy forms.) This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the proposed Insured and the amount of the policy or policies committed for have been inserted in Schedule A hereof by the Company, either at the time of the issuance of this Commitment or by subsequent endorsements and is subject to the Conditions and Stipulations on the back of this cover. This Commitment is preliminary to the issuance of such policy or policies of title insurance and all liability and obligations hereunder shall cease and terminate six months after the effective date hereof or when the policy or policies committed for shall issue, whichever first occurs, provided that the failure to issue such policy or policies is not the fault of the Company. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY has caused its corporate name and seal to be hereunto affixed by its duly authorized officers on the date shown in Schedule A. NOTE:THE POLICY COMMITTED FOR MAY BE EXAMINED BY INQUIRY AT THE OFFICE WHICH ISSUED THE COMMITMENT, AND A SPECIMEN COPY OF THE POLICY FORM (OR FORMS) REFERRED TO IN THIS COMMITMENT WILL BE FURNISHED PROMPTLY UPON REQUEST. I TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY ( (OPORA4D INSBy: X744.----- tg it �` SfPj,16 tg92 Chairman and Chief Executive Officer * 11R4ZeIZOF Attest: t ,( T � //(—" 'Secretary Commitment-WA Cover Fnrm 1004-252 (3-931 TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 14450 N.E. 29TH PLACE BELLEVUE, WA 98007 Prepared for: Transnation No. : 868340 Customer Reference: LANDAMERICA Escrow No. • Seller Powell 1200 6TH AVE. , STE. 1910 Buyer/Borrower Pacific Gulf Propertes SEATTLE, WA 98101 Attn: KATE MCCUSKER By radAjd For s-. - o t is or•er ca . (425 64. 858. /1-800-441-7701 JOHN W. ONES MARK S . NIKLASON CLA AI ' a LIER or J. JAY PUGH # (425) 646-8593) SCHEDULE A EFFECTIVE DATE: February 23 , 1999 at 8 :00 A.M. 1 . Policy or policies to be issued: Amount ALTA Owner' s Policy $1, 550, 000 . 00 Premium $3, 073 . 00 Standard Policy Tax $ 264 . 28 Proposed Insured: PACIFIC DEVELOPMENT COMPANY Total $3, 337.28 2 . Title to fee simple estate or interest in said land is at the effective date hereof vested in: POWELL-ORILLIA L.L.C. , A WASHINGTON LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY 3 . The land referred to in\this commitment is described as follows : LOTS 2 AND 3 OF SHORT PLAT NO. LUA-97-159-SHPL, ACCORDING TO THE SHORT PLAT RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 9805219013 ; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. Order No. 868340 SCHEDULE B REQUIREMENTS. Instruments necessary to create the estate or interest to be insured must be properly executed, delivered and duly filed for record. EXCEPTIONS. Schedule B of the policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following matters unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company. A. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed Insured acquires for value of record the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. B. Standard exceptions set forth in inside of back cover. C. Special exceptions : 1 . Real Estate Excise Tax pursuant to the authority of RCW Chapter 82 .45 and subsequent amendments thereto. the date herein, the tax rate for said property is 4K---e0178 . 2 . General Taxes, as follows, together with interest, penalty and statutory foreclosure costs, if any, after delinquency: (1st half delinquent May 1; 2nd half delinquent November 1) Tax Account No. Year Billed Paid Balance 125360-0062-04 1999 $9, 015 .72 $0 . 00 $9, 015 . 72 (Covers Lot 2) 125360-0065-01 1999 $12, 554 .22 $0. 00 $12, 554 .22 (Covers Lot 3) The levy code for the property herein described iq 2110 for 1999 . 3 . Noxious Weed Charge, as follows, together with interest, penalty and statutory foreclosure costs, if any, after delinquency: (1st half delinquent May 1; 2nd half delinquent November 1) Tax Account No. Year Billed Paid Balance 125360-0062-04 1999 $0 .85 $0 . 00 $0. 85 - (Covers Lot 2) . 125360-0065-01 1999 $0 .85 $0 . 00 $0 . 85 (Covers Lot 3) • Page 2 Order No. 868340 4 . Conservation (CON) Service Charge, as follows, together with interest, penalty and statutory foreclosure costs, if any, after delinquency: (1st half delinquent May 1; 2nd half delinquent November 1) Tax Account No. Year Billed Paid Balance 125360-0062-04 1999 $5 . 00 $0 . 00 $5 . 00 (Covers Lot 2) 125360-0065-01 1999 $5 . 00 $0 . 00 $5 . 00 / (Covers Lot 3) ✓ 5 . EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Company PURPOSE: Underground communication cable AREA AFFECTED: Portion of Lots 6, 7 and 12 in block 1; and Lots 5 , 6, 7, and 8 in block 2 of Burlington Northern Orillia Industrial Park of Renton Division I RECORDING NO. : 7905090844 6 . Restrictive covenants imposed by instrument recorded on May 4 , 1981, under Recording No. 8105040070 . 7 . ALL COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS, RESERVATIONS, EASEMENTS, OR OTHER SERVITUDES, if any, disclosed by recorded binding site plan of Burlington Northern, recorded under Recording No. 9206302696 . RIGHTS OR BENEFITS, IF ANY, WHICH MAY BE DISCLOSED BY THE RECORDED DOCUMENT (S) ABOVE AFFECTING LAND OUTSIDE THE BOUNDARY DESCRIBED IN SCHEDULE A. 8 . EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: uRAN'I'EE: Builiucy. Lon Northern Railroad Company, a Delaware corporation PURPOSE: Railroad purposes AREA AFFECTED: Railroad right-of-way located within the plat RECORDING NO. : 8110210541 (Partial release of easement recorded under Recording No. 9203200273) 9 . EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: -- GRANTEE: The City of Renton, a municipal corporation PURPOSE: Traffic signal operations and maintenance AREA AFFECTED: as described therein RECORDING NO. : 9206302701 • • Page 3 Order No. 868340 10 . RECIPROCAL EASEMENT AGREEMENT WITH COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: BETWEEN: Powell-Orillia Associates, a Washington general partnership AND: HCWA Realty Corp. , a Washington corporation DATED: June 30, 1992 RECORDED: June 30, 1992 RECORDING NO. : 9206302702 REGARDING: Reciprocal easements and covenants, conditions and restrictions First Amendment recorded February 8, 1996 under Recording No. 9602081399 . / 11 . EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: PURPOSE: Access over and certain utility rights AREA AFFECTED: as described therein RECORDING NO. : 9603291895 12 . AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: RECORDED: July 3, 1996 RECORDING NO. : 9607030996 REGARDING: Indemnification NOTE 1 : We are informed that Powell-Orillia L.L.C. is a Limited Liability Company (LLC) . A copy of the duplicate original of the filed LLC Certificate of Formation, the LLC agreement, and all subsequent modifications or amendments must be submitted to the Company for review. NOTE 2 : ---- --- -- _- - According to the application for title insurance, the proposed insured(s) is/are Pacific Gulf Properties . We find no pertinent matters of record against the name (s) of said party(ies) . _ NOTE 3 : There may be Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) Security interests filed with the Department of Licensing in Olympia affecting personal property, crops or agricultural facilities which are -- not covered by the policy to issue. • Page 4 Order No. 868340 • NOTE 4 : The above captioned description may be incorrect, because the application for title insurance contained only an address and/or Parcel Number. Prior to closing, all parties to the transaction must verify the legal description. If further changes are necessary, notify the Company well before closing so that those changes can be reviewed. Closing instructions must indicate that the legal description has been reviewed and approved by all parties. NOTE 5 : The following may be used as an abbreviated legal description on the documents to be recorded, per amended RCW 65. 04 . SAID ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS NOT A SUBSTITUTE FOR A COMPLETE LEGAL DESCRIPTION WITHIN THE BODY OF THE DOCUMENT. LOTS 2-3 S P NO. LUA-97-159-SHPL REC NO. 9805219013 END OF EXCEPTIONS Investigation should be made to determine if there are any service, installation, maintenance or construction charges for sewer, water, or electricity. In the event this transaction fails to close, a cancellation fee will be charged for services rendered in accordance with our rate schedule. CLE/erl ENCLOSURES : Sketch Vesting deed All recorded encumbrances Page 5 •r•.r•••• r••.T 1 ' I // L.E.;AL DCSr1+IPnoNs l �.�....+•c.+ .:._ ! /U\ �o ••• .rr I .� .�: : / PARCEL A LOT I •..a... j SEE ♦ SP J74-7f .........w •WNW•SI WINO r •11 a s�•rw• j I DETAI •A• a .•r maw.r,�..•ce. •:arr•.• wo•a - ..•a•••ir•r•a...i ri.� .r •.•:• 1 ' •.r.0 a RIM Mr r.1s.• - •�..••• r 7••1 a•a a- I / .v,•err• •••••••oral• 141.0. r U.a• •••O•••• :�.. •r -T- TT I •.v a tin=WV r.0 mtg.. arr j■` i , =i_ '--- — .: -T}•�, .••••a•.•••a•mr•d c .. . 3)r S I -- - 1 .••-r'UM"RNA •.a...� w•Mal �r 1 r•roan ': ---- ' 1 1 t Mt •r manor r n - tjS, I I-1_ ••wa•rt a• Oft r•.v. 4.1 • vo arm mama.•r••.r• ;9 rc r arw• .. ••c , aIe our.•tr •, Iwr••r1•/d.' PIR.Y r. •» -••_ _ +':i I v1 a•rr ••IM 0• ' rrnrl 1rr•••••ar•I•N r OIL • .r• 1 I S 0IL w r•m•t_1• L• w. m•ar •a M I, r u •s•a••••✓ a,IY r.or'Aar Nrr . 1.rt :•w a(.1 1�, 1 ,• W.t aw,1 fir• ,rr•1.Map r .r• J ^ r. ,,. , / 6 •as3.wl II2 LOT 2 o.a• : 4 Al r 1r.•r•••••• 1 r1..-. J _ : 1 •/ u w !I; (LW-f4-I3F-LLf) �••.~m..o T .• 3 •arara r.1 1 1 I d .'• •mare. ruo NEM IIe.Y 1 ►••..•••.•err a••r R' OCTAl. •w , f f-i f u r a>••••r •a r r nr WPM r DV• ••7-_-•I r•�r fir• ....I •n•••.•••OSLIr•••1•• • .w a a..c• I ; I l0) 7 J w 1 a•1�••.•••ry•wren ...• .rr•av•rr at,.5,4 1 • • I •O••K Siff PLAN Oa • 1•r. l• Nre•TI PA• &CP.• as 1r••w•• )[ ILr !or •••...r1•.•. a•s•.•w• e.t.a •••••.r• 1•111 O• • /II2••G7O4 NOW RNfIN • ma r rrMIr rrl a D,.r•••n.o a • 111 -3 /6I MO GI•-OJtoff•o•Lome.•r r• n $ u►II•I•�•Mae ar••16 • v I•Ma l'a�11I p1 - •or r•o I•mr•.u.rl.n. *NW; A.S r/•• IN i N. RIP•..r..ro •:&LAM m••II > •tlfraal••• ■ +m•.w a •v w.o I. • • ., . t - .- - - - - - I •i l rye r•I•••►.•roc T lilt! I• i DrOY I vrr•• a'. a•.r.v• p I •r•APO/PER PO•••.w 1.• Z . sal rrr r1•ar elm••' rue ba u•.err 1- • D a E • •a••w•4•\Loom 1••.0 MbY 1 rr•._••arl I MD - r.r•1 a r•0t r.._... ; - .1 .A1rrwlti....t.w LOT 3 : I COP..LAMP a•.r... •1•wow•r r 1•.••••r• I I ••Or w• , (t a r�r. _.r•...motor.•to"1 •O I 1' i IN w I I •sr>A •D I Ayr -'/ t I •tll..fin WORMS /, 1. 0ww•p�..o�i••••pr4• ., - ••wP.a rs•• • Yr••.rr WI.1.•IN•I. SW 3s TN 3 .•I OR •••I•••c • ? •s t.r...o.•1•w'1• ro•r•i. ••.n OMEN..At Poe STREET • ! / 'U,•r.ar.wan... •� u r is•f-•.11 a �T •� ..ar•.1•+r NISI r•. - i rrc s '�• !f{ ••r. ..•.a arc w•••.•. ` \ I. • ? au w oar••• L1Y-Id-►57-LLA .v r. ...a ra•C..c roc • ' L 1 `` / • .•I. •room I . .Ir r1 , r 1" [jinni COMM mac ILI-,NO-.00 / • I .r.. \ f' i.�1 •E 170 im•.• .. Nam.. •r11 r.r..•a GR-Y. I >r \` 15'_ .•nl0.l..r: f 1.•an•11,14I+ I I ..e.}J..1r..r•. �, I Ab 1 1!1.7. I Itil•a Y�L•-.•.ti emu:- I . .•.L LW-Ilo-o•o I G - t.PM.o•••ao•• If.D Iw.4.st I Ire y - - LAND SURVEYOR'S 1 ra• ..c f-)•I)0-000. •r•C - a.MO '•• - I I •matt T•.r. s•aonl A.1••..a nI .1♦1•L NB ••Norm• 'q 01.1•arm•sr.11 N01. NI IP2101 MCI Y••L w-:.:I l menicammuiesimiliss -- .-.. ••. ,•d LEGAL DC�CRIPTION r"� ,...c... • This sketch is provided, without charge, for your information. It is not intended to show all - matters related to the property including, but not limited to, area. dimensions, easements, en- croachments. or location of boundaries. It is not a part of. nor does it modity, the commitment or policy to which it is attached. The Company assumes NO LIABILITY for any matter related to this sketch. References should be made to an accurate survey for further information. ,v/ r-T���������r��rr�r�ruu�rr���������r��rnr����rr�r��rr�rr����nm��rr�rnnn��nr�m�r��rr�rn�r��in�urrrrrrrrnn�inm������n���r��r�nu�r����m�m�������n�nr��n������rr��r�rrrn�rr�r��r��r�� -44 NORTHWEST REGION Northwest Region WASHINGTON Park Place#1910 • Sixth Avenue at University Street Seattle,Washington 98101 Chelan-Douglas Counties (206)628-2800 700 N.Mission Street,Wenatchee,WA (509)662-4721 • • Clark County Agency Operations 501 S.E.Columbia Shores Boulevard Park Place#1910 Suite 500,Vancouver,WA Sixth Avenue at University Street (206)695-1301 Seattle,Washington 98101 • (206)628-2725 11, King County 1200 6th Ave.,Ste#100 Park Place Building Seattle,WA 98101 (206)628-4650 • TITLE AGENTS i� Kitsap County COMMITMENT FOR 9619 Levin Road N.W.,Silverdale,WA TITLE INSURANCE (360)692-4556 WASHINGTON • Benton • Clallam • Cowlitz •Franklin Okanogan County 700 Okoma Drive,Omak,WA (509)422-3490 Island • Jefferson • King • Lewis • Pierce County Pacific • Skagit • Whatcom• Yakima 6111 100th Street S.W. Tacoma,Washington (206)589-1488 OREGON • Benton • Jackson •Linn Snohomish County 2939 Colby Avenue,Everett,WA Marion • Polk • Yamhill (206)252-1156 • Spokane County North 720 Argonne Road,Spokane,WA ISSUED BY (509)922-2222 TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY • Thurston y 2625 Martin rtin Way,Olympia,WA (206)943-4150 • HOME OFFICE: OREGON 1700 Market Street I Philadelphia,PA 1 9103-3 99 0 Multnomah • Clackamus • Washington Counties 2200 US,Bancorp Tower 111 S W Fifth Avenue • Portland,Oregon 97204 (503)222-9931 B 1004-252A WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO:Fl. al I ALST'IN COURTNACF MACAI -AV&PROCTOR LLP Il 1000.,ECOND AVENUE,SUITE 3900 i SFATTLE,WA 9810.s-1045 O 4 ATTN: J.PARKER MASON O 1% 1 .11 at jilt 1 i 1 ti 1 ct 1 I Docum- ti Title: Quit Claim Deed al Grantor. Powell-Orillia Associates c Grantee: Powell-Orillia L.L.C. Ler;al Dr,r-iption: Abbreviated Legal Description: Lots 4,F and 7 of Burlington Northern,a binding site plan,according to the City of Rentor. Binding Site Plan recorded en r. under King County Recording No. 9206302696, in Volume 161 of Plats, W Page 8 through 11,Records of King County Full Legal Description: See below Assessor's Tax Parcel Nos.: 125360-0040-01; 125360-0050-08; 125360-0060-06 • Reference Nos.of Documents Released or Assigned: Not applicable • r c., t0 .. II', QUIT CLAIM DEED O • t THE GRANTOR, POWELL-ORILLIA ASSOCIATES, a Washington general partnership, pursuant to the dissolution of the partnership, conveys and quit claims to CT) POWELL-ORILLIA L.L.C., a Washington limited liability company, the following described real estate, situated in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington, I . together with P'1 appurtenances thereto: • Lots 4, 6 and 7 of Burlington Northern, a binding site plan, according to the City of Renton Binding Site Plan recorded under King County Recording No. 9206302696, in Volume 161 of Plats, Page 8 through I I, Records of King County. DATED this the 23 rd day of April, 1997. POWELL-ORILLIA ASSOCIATES, 1 A a Washin ton general partnership i tl■ 4 By U,—) Loyd owell,General Partner II BySill-Pi..fe • i Pe W.Powell,General Partner _ I X .8 ,G f 1366v36.11:3/31/97 •1• . QUITCLAIM ii r 1MASOMPOWhIDORIWA • s4`.t� V� STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. COUNTY OF y+yl/1� _ ) - ..� On this d day of ,1997,before me,the undersigned,a''ntny P IbI,, in and F:.)the State of Ww.'lington,duly commissioned and swom personally appeared Lloyd W. Powell, known to me to be the General Partner of POWELL-ORILLIA ASSOCIATES,the partnership that executed the foregoing instrument,and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said partnership,for the purposes ■ there,:mentioned,and on oath stated that he was authorized to :x.c;te said instrument. I certify that I know or have satisfactory e.:der.-e that the person appearing beibre me • and making this acknowledgment i'the person who.:true signature appears on this document. • WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the uay and yea,•in the..crta,cate above written. 4 azure . �a mile} 6e12 ztn�er NOTARY PUBLIC Print Name STATE OF WASH:NGTON _LANCE TZCHMACIIMACHER NOTARY PUBLIC in and fo the Stat f MY Aceovmn.nt E,q,+.i JUL 10.1998 Washington,residing at My commission expires 7' a,• • • Ln O tT STATE OF WASHINGTON ) 0 )ss. COUNTY OF ) On this C day of 4A .4iJ} ,1997,before me,the undersigned,a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington,duly commissioned and sworn personally appeared Peter W. Powell, known to me to be the General Partner of POWELL-ORILLIA ASSOCIATES the partnership that executed the foregoing instrument,and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said partnership,for the purposes therein mentioned,and on oath stated that he was authorized to execute said instrument. I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that the person appearing before me and making this acknowledgment is the person whose true signature appears on this document. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year in the certificate above written. - �>✓4Lf� LidhA/X.L eli-LJ Sgn re , NOTARYDUBh1C l?/C'e/ // ?��1JL�L� STATE o WASANGION Print Name JAN'CE n'f bode, t NOTARY PUBLIC is arrd f r e State f _ '4A ,r",.^1 ECM Jut to.Ip0/ Washington,residing at • My commission expires • d' itmeonM.3/31N7 •:• QUI!C1.AIM )A1AS)N\POWI I.I.u)NII.1.1, I PNB Res:- >* tom:, o, • Lsr. A-Y1.41' ( I v D��II \ ..rr � 1 1.1 • i a Y AY 9 '9"'- I EASEMENT . • FU53•1:)50 =r cantor, GLACIER PARK COMPANY, a Minnesota corporation, hereinafter =r 1 called Grantor, for and in consideration of Ten and No/100 Dollars ($10.00) to it ' a paid, and the agreements herein contained, does hereby grant to PACIFIC NORTHWEST BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, a Washington corporation, hereinafter called Grantee, an n w- easement for underground communication cable through, under and along the follo n ing described premises situated in King County, Washington: 0 A strip of land 10 feet wide located in Section T0, Township 23 R North, Range 5 East, M.M., lying parallel with, adjacent to and cr. easterly of the east line of the new alignment cf Lind Avenue l and being more particularly indicated in green on print marked ` Exhibit "A" and attached hereto. This easement is wade subject to and upon the following express con- ditions: I The Grantor, for itself and its successors and assigns, reserves all rights to use the property hereinbefore described for any and all purposes what- soever not inconsistent with the easement hereby granted when deemed necessary • or expedient to the Grantor. Rights reserved shall be so exercised as not to • damage or interfere with the easement as above defined. This easement is subject to all existing interests of third parties in said property of any kind or nature whatsoever and any and all extensions or renewals thereof. I1 'ibis instrument does not grant or convey unto the Grantee any rights or • title to the surface of the soil along the route of said permanent utility ease- ment except for the purpose of laying down, inspecting, restoring and replacing utilities; provided that any such work which shall disturb the surface of the soil shall be subject to the granting of a temporary construction permit granted by the Grantor. III The Grantee shall protect and save harmless the Grantor from any and all claims, demands, loss, daaage expense and liability of every kind and description I so including personal injury and for any damage to or loss or destruction of property whatsoever suffered by the Grantor, its -heirs, successors and assigns, or by any persons, firms or corporations, because of the construction andi'or maintenance of said facilities. lv In the event that said property :hall at any time cease to h. hfsw,I for utilit> purposes. or shall by operation of law or otherwise hec^tie vacated or abandoned, the easement herein granted- shall lamodiate'y cease and terminate with- out notice of other proceedings on the part of the Grantor and the Grantee, its successor" or assign'. shall Immediately reconvey said property to the i:rantor. , ' ') I !' • ' , .. :‘. .:::, ! I ‘ li / . / . ............. S I enAmt.,.II. W ®! . I t 1 ` I . , IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has caused this instrument to be •' executed by its proper officers and its corporate seal to be hereunto affixed this 27th day of November , 1978. • GLACIER PIRA COMPANY 1 By L,� P' , V�� i 0 ice sad t • 0 Attest ' / X.-Ctt ,�„._,._ ..`o`-`—' C Asst. Secretary 0' . I` ACCEPTED: PACIFIC NORTHWEST BELL TELE HONE COMPANY By Dirie n Ehai 1 is de Plant Attest: <<--r7-• Tree au iesietant ecretary STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) as. • County of Ramsey ) On this 27th day of November , 1978, before - me personally appeared J, C. Itenady and O. F. Steinhibel , • to ne known to be Vice President and Assistant Secretary of the corporation that executed the within and foregoing instrument and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation for the uses and purposes therein mentioned and on oath stated that they were authorlred to execute the raid instrument Ind that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set ay hand and affixed my official seal the day and yrar first above written. • _.......---,2_.......---,2 ,L...—YJ /I�y I otary u c in an or t e . a o M►unesota, residing i St. Paul. • t r s, . 7 Page 1 of 2 paps, 12. • I $ ,. 7905090844a • oI .a._ Gi :� . I .t. riii, .. S I:yG t { i1 dbJ f dCI I 1 I \ / • Jr us us /.q • , I I \\\ \�.-15 5 �/ O e / I1 823 - N. • tJ / f --- �t3-_ I \ 635 / al wJ N!N r /�;ii — — -- 8�5--- --Q B — e •°`' _ -605 !� i ���'�'A25 r 640 - ....1 NI I 60 5 ? "`� pC.1 N QN� I ��� g y' O -.-.U. Vr 665 1 _ 32 5 O " 1 . t+o — 1 5.5 - to ol CO NN , Ni t,+ y' r r, � O § O O, '' S OHO u - - 7 9 0 665 w isi . .-. -_— --.-- _------- i I f 'sill 1 1 '♦- , c !.5 34� 1 265 1 265 24i I i> \ f a in ii ; 1 i . �Od ^p/�O � `o /I\ I . I e ;'8 c°.'/As. `7J 1 /.; 1 n i • i hi . 186000 ' I r i� 15O COO� 275 �oi' h � \ %/ 16.5 1 % • 'Q { • / 1 1 !kJ i O I 400 _ . _ . .I Z.m 655 1 565 %I % i� ` R 1 ,`.. , I. p 8' 4OO I j 0 ��� ' 445O 3 85000� i .. • 2 1 , • 6875 '16.5•--- 965 --------J .. — 6 eo -- I ; --�5— I . sit • G // � 950I , % r i'l 715 .// � c/ _— _55- -- ---- 725 /' / / / / 0/' ,/ �J 1 214000d \1F' 0 /172500c� ,`=—i 1 / / / / / / {/ 700 f/ // b' '53 1 I ° �' S 14; 4(s/ Sr '� 1 � I J 12t�b —-— . i II i 1 - / 1 80 - OML,.s,X �:NDU�T:1,Z. r7�K ; RENTC , WA. — --1 10 a5E .�J T �l 5 N N.T . '. I // r'',M. M. �::JTTL . r ram' ;r• 9 •��o•:IU ' ,:fr7 ! / / •, / /. . -may.• .. .. wit 7 iId trt . iy Ii RES:III:NYE COVENANT r 17 CD THIS MENTOR( entered into between f,LAL:IER PARK COMPAYT. a Minnesota i_. ii corporation, hereinafter called 'Omer', and Brad Cunningham, an individual, L • •r,•: C Ul here+nafter called 'Purchaser', i : :;,.l WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Owner presently owns Lots A and 6, Block.2. Burlington !b rtn•r'rt:. penile Industrial Park of Renton Division I. according to plat recorded under Auditors No. 7809250902, King County. Washington; and WHEREAS, Purchaser desires to expand a building on Lot 5 of said ' Block 2, and the parties. as • result thereof. desire to establish setback requirements with respect to future building or buildings to be constructedon I 17. '+.. .. said Lots 4, 5. and 6. Block 2, of said recorded plat; NOW, THEREFORE. !Or ;:03 and valuable COnsiderltfon. the parties agree �.:: .-•.'... t as follows: j om.::.. .- 1. No building or structure shall be constructed or mainLarned on Chi- �1 smut', 24 f►rr of Int 6, And the rest 39 feet of Lot A. Block 2. of said recorded 15 1• — plat. t - emsJ 1 2. No building or structure shall be constructed or Iraintained on the i. - 4 :dst ?_ r..t of Cat 5, ree4 plat. y ;, j, TM+c averment snail bt Drndlnq uVon the heirs, successors and t r I n same c Iiii:.:. � f the ;ar•!es. 'er^I'+'•I"" ^r rnese covenants or any clanger a.t:•lns _ . S iI ir * .‘2 must be approved Dy the city of Menton. OATEN tors 22r.id _ � day or � : I'MEGLACIER PARK CUMPAN. I 1 e •r.•S 1 en - Fill i Attest: /" / A ..`.,y__ t • i �131STNsl Secretary . • 1:,: 7 • . 10 I'UNI IiA•,i K NIT 4 C :7 tH 'M; ti 1l / , II,: rl�,•t'r cKtic•.(y_•'i;._'_-- 3 in."""ll"r' I S I i ;. STATE In MINNESOT. ) County ut Ramsey ) is.- J :t 5: On this 22nd day of April , 1981, before me Personally appeared j r xpr.ly •IN rt. . Sur in t_ 1 .� known to be Vice President and Ass i tans ecretary, respectively of t - D :- GLACIER PARK COMPANY, the corporation that executed the within and forefoing J instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary { J act and deed of said corporation for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. r i J and on oath stated that they were authorized to execute said tnstrunt. i ! i•` I .n lI:T`:r.S vurOn rc herewithhave herern set my hand end affixed ape off•cial j J seal the day and year first above written. s 111 uuuaa•u► 'AAA /� 2 w t.u.t� Votary P•. is In and i•r t e 1 nauN•cou�+rr State o Minnesota, siding a yr taRan,.v l.:•,f va. 17,1}t� at sP Paul, itfOreVereerreetvermyseverrererrtX1111 rl ►y Commission expires t liovfrber 17. 191.5._ STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS COUNTY OF 0,14 ) Mil On this day personally e,,.. r+ Mfnre no fe7,an ("fA/01/1/ ,waH .et to me known to ha the individual described in arrwho executed the , within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that • stoned tho same as free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentione�— 1 G)'9EN under epr hand and of'1,ctal seal this .n(94 day of /� d i' (' '/I''2 ?. /a ; �l� • Notary PubTit in and for T I 1] Stated 1;a n n, residing tl tIII. Itll i . • Ilr 1 I vt u5 • - : 1 1 1 i',... ' . / I , I hpr,.0 Ury IVOL11611 PAGE la' I I KROLL MAY COMPANY,INC. SCATTLE• 161 8 BURLINGTON NORTHERN • FILE NO. BSP - 014-92 A BINDING SITE PLA[L ,0.1.. ,I, SIGNATURE PAGE . P't.-W"i: SECTION 30, TWP. 23 N. , RGE.5 E, WM. :. SECTION 31 , TWP. 23 N. , RGE. 5 E, W.M. ICATIO D[OXO CITY Cr RENTON KING COUNTY WASHINGTON 'i,..,,H,;•'4- KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS THAT WE. THE UNDERSIGNED, OWNERS ,..... y,r 73 IN FEE SIMPLE Or THE LAND HEREBY PLATTED, HEREBY DECLARE THIS PLAT AND DEDICATE TO nit PUBLIC FOANER, ALL ROADS, EAS DIENTS AND WAYS SHOWN HEREON WITH/ THE RIGHT TO MAKE ALL NECESSARY SLOPES FOR • CUTS AND FILLS. AND THE RIGHT TO CONTINUE TO DRAIN SAID ROADS AND WAYS OVER AND ACROSS ANY LOT OR LOTS, WHERE WATER MIGHT TAKE A ELIUSi NATURAL COURSE, IN THE ORIGINAL REASONABLE GRADING OI THE ROADS AND WAYS SHOWN MERLON. DEVELO►WENT OR CONSTRUCTION O/ ANY IMPROVEMENTS UPON THE REAL PRO►ERTY HEREIN DESCRIBED SHALL It IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE BINDING BNGTON NCMTNERH RAILROAD PN(PKRYIIS,HC GLACIER PANM D:JA►ANY , VRLI SITE PLAN APPROVED BY Tilt CITY OF RENTON OM "Ms,,}, IN'.-, AND A CELAwARE COVPORATICM A DELAWAR( CDRPpATION THE (FINAL PLAT) (FINAL ►LAMMED UNIT DEVELOPMENT) APPROVED BY THE } /� rr) CITT Or REN5OM OM 17/t , its. FYI )1.1.+'p� FYI '^' TOTS BINDING SIT! PLAN AND ALL 0/ ITS R[OUIR[M[MT/ SHALL !t It*: JICA PTV A• ..-i Its: 1/L 1 A.,..-.-.hi..j LEGALLY UIFORC[AILE OM ANY PIYRCNASEI OR OTHIER PERSON ACQUIRING AM INTEREST IN THE WITHIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY AND ALL PORTIONS OF THE PROPERTY IN THIS BINDING SITE PLAN ARE SUBJECT TO SETBACK STATE Or WASHINGTON) REQUIREMENTS Of VT/ OF RENTON SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE. Ism COUNTY Or KING ) T IS 1S TO CERTIFY THAT ON THIS ..1y DAY 0/ SAND ZIIRVIVIHR'Y crRTIFICATPI 1f1,2, BEFORE M[ r[RSOMALLT APPEARED 4 F - I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS BINDING SITE PLAN IS BASED ON THE TO ME KMOWM TO B NE, ..i O BURL NGTOM MOITN Rol PRO►ERTT SURVEY AS PREPARED BY BUSH. ROED AND MITCHINCS, INC., RAILROAD PROPERTIES INC., TM[ COA►ONA ION THAT EXECUTED THE AND RECORDED UNDER RING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 1110S15/00S, THAT THE WITHIN AND FOREGOING INSTRUMENT, AND ACKNOWLEDGED SAID INSTRUMENT BEARINGS AND DISTANCES ARE SHOWN CORRECTLY, AND THAT THE LOT TO BE THE FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT AND DEED Of SAID CORPORATION, CORNERS SHALL SE SET ON THE GROUND. FOR THE/USES AND PURPOSES THEREIN MENTIONED, AND ON OATH STATED • THAT - / L.•• -/ ,n..r.na .•.S,,-•!•..-� ....}AUTHORIZED I//7�. L TO EXECUTE SAID 1NSTRUN CNt, & '•F'%y ECM.../' (.1/•'AL+ IN WITNESS WHEREOF, SAID CORPORATION HAS CAUSED THIS INSTRUMENT 3Lr►RLY J. MCMANUS, P.L.B.2/OT2 BE EXECUTED /T ITS PROPER omen THIS -?•y P---- T DAT 0/ I - A-.2. IP • , � 5PPROVAI.3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I RAVE HEREUNTO SET Ill'NAND AND AFFIXED MT EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS 2.$' DAY 01 JVWP , 1/102 A.D. OFFICIAL SEAL THE DAT AND YEAS FIRST ABOVE WRITTEN. /11 YN�(9� I . , ADMIMICYNAYS 07 ,L MN M/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS N AAY PUBLIC Ill AND FOR Tit(STATE .. •.. •: Oy/WASMINGT'ON, RESIDING AT (,,Yfle STATE OFVASHINCTOM) (�•1:-r�� .`r./.p�[� )R• � 1 a- 'j3/// ASSESSOR'S CTRTIFTFATFI COUNTY OF RING ) ,,/ EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS 3 0 OAT OF J✓4 , IRKS A.O. T S IS TO CERTIFY THAT ON THIS r DAY or .....:.— IA lEroR[ MrT33axLL4 APPEARED �Q �,Q �f, C �`� AssusoR VIEFFrEITEE 'TO N[ KNOW TO SE TM ► GLACIER PANE COMPA- NY. THE CORPORATION THAT XLCUTLD THE WITHIN AND FOREGOING IN- STRUMENT, AND ACRNOWLEDGED SAID INSTRUMENT TO BE THE FREE AND • VOLUNTARY ACT AND DEED O/ SAID CORPORATION, FOR TIME USES AND IIMAMCF T72RiLTOt•S rPRTITtr17F1 N / R u ►OS C`3 THEREIN MENTIONED, AND ON OATH STATED THAT AUTHORIZED TOARE EXECUTE SAID 1NST RUMENT• I HEREBY crwrxrr THAT ALL F TY TAXES PAID, THAT ICE FOE MO DELINQUENT SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS CERTIFIED TO THIS OTFICE FOR IN WITNESS WHEREOF, SAID CORPORATION HAS CAUSED THIS INSTRUMENT COLLECTION, AND THAT ALL SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS, CERTIFIED TO THIS T BE EXECUTED SY ITS PROPER OIIICER THIS .4?4.1 DAT OF OFFICE FOR COLLECTION ON ANY OI THE PROPERTY HEREIN CONTAINED, 111!?. DEDICATED AS STREETS, ALLEYS, OR TOR OTH is PV/LIC USE, Ara PAID - IN rSLL TNT' .' DAT OF T.,.e . lB,ij. �,...•.11 I',)` IM WETNESS WHEREOF, I HAVE HEREUNTO SET NY NAND AND AFIIXED MT . \,t F• orrlCIAL SEAL THE DAT AND YEAR FIRST ABOVE WRITTEN. 'or/ICE 0/ FINANCE I .r to••Qi„C.:.•S/! / NOT Y PUBLIC•IN AND F R H STATE DIRECTOR, .IMG COUNTY DEPUTY, RING COVN'1'}!"1. : • ''� L/ .+1't OFFICE Or FINANCE 2S OFFICE OF FINANCE 5 ' Or SHI NGTOM, RESIDING AT /I` .. .'is'.!! L!-+.f.a+.rAND F 4..[.i-Icy' �'T''4:M RG1Ot �1,���••- -�/4'' '• DIRccroa or FINANCE ° I I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THERE AU MO DELINQUENT S►ECIAL ASSESSMENT! PARCEL A: AND THAT ALL SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS CERTIFIED TO TMS CITY TREASURER THAT PORTION 01 IURLINGTOM NORTHERN ORILLIA INDUSTRIAL PARE Or FOR COLLECTION OM ANY PROPERTY MERLIN CONTAINED DEDICATED FOR RENTON DIVISION I, AS PER PLAY RECORDED IN VOLUME 1011 OF PLATS, STREETS, ALLEYS. OR ER PUBLIC USE ARE PAID IN ►ULL. - _ PACES 12 MID 13, RECORDS Or DISC COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS /OLLOWSI •/ • }(J / BLACK 2; LOTS 1, I, 3, -•, 7 AND It AND LOT 2 or CITT OF RENTON ADJUSTMENT / V -'�1•-- , G/QZ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. LLA•014-SS, RECORDED UNDER RING COUNTY - b/Z RECORDING MO. S602139001/ DIRECTOR, CITY OF RENTON OFFICE Cr ►INANCE TOGETHER WITH THOSE PORTIONS OF RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY LYING . ADJACENT TO LOTS 1, 2. 3, X, 7, I AND S IN BLOCK I, AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT O/ BURLINGTON NORTHERN ORIISIA INDUSTRIAL PARE OF RENIOM EPCORDIMG rrRTTF7rNT71 9/Q i3 C.7 67 6 DIVISION I, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 1011 Or PLATS, PAGES 12 AND 13, RECORDS Of RING COUNTY/ FILED FOR RECORD AT THE REQUEST Of THE CITY OF RENTON THIS -fo DAY Or 7-,.... , IHf., AT H0 MINUTES PAST J °__- SITUATE IN THE CITT OF RENTON, COUNTY OF RING, STATE OF WASHING- AND RECORDED IN VOLUME .,/ O/ PLATS, PAGES Jr_....a_____, TON. _ - CORDS Or RING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. ?ARC DIVISION OF RECORDS AND ELECTIONS ~ PARCEL A N OF SHORT PLAT NO. 27/-7/, ACCORDING TO THE SNORT FLAT _ Q1•-+ RECORDED UNDER XING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 710124/0012 • SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY or KING, STATE OF WASHING- Tcrte Ala R..e TOM. WAGER SUPEEIMT ENT 0► ACCORDS (..''''''' ') 7 I OF • VOL. 161 i PAGE 9 I KAOLL IAA, COMPANY,INC. EATTLE 161 9 BURLINGTON NORTHERN = FILE NO. BSP - 014 -92 A OINPING SITE PLAN _ f NEW LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS �/{J SECTION 30, TWP. 23 N. , RGE.5 E. W.M. 7;1. SECTION 31 , TWP. 23 N. , RGE. 3 E. W.M. 1:;,f':^:1";•:.- t. CITY Of RENTON KING COUNTY , wASNINGTON `000T a.,Pj , 3GL11 UOI-11 ▪•.CIL 0 or CRT Of ICYTOl ROAR SLAT.0. )70.10, AO flCO.OII Tw•T.ORIec M elt a I or T,FLAT N O to 00O. •1016 eta NIl. vat.* tiro Coo.TT ■TTI/1NT AO. .IA .P 11Rn1•L Itj N.O,,R Ryon, .WR I.CTOo. 01KS10mn1 CAL Il AM 11, ATOM.Or IN fO.IrR. RLAw•. POuwF1 ▪ttlnli AT RC lofOUST Cmo Of LOT 0 Or SLOG 1 or Tot PLAT COmOCKIN AT Tot io,T.LA.t CONn N RAT I Or 1010 &LOWS 1: or wlLi Aston ........O&ILLIA IVOCITR LAL it,, N ROWS&ORS 1.10'I9•RR•IS,&TOO LA,'1./It Or La,. 1 u tt or •scOOS t0 eo, IM of PLATS. r 11 11, L<OOOO .1 IL L sin....Or W 1f SCS I a si ... I)10.1• TERI TCt OV • 0T1• .0, s Yt 'ASS* ARO TIRO .1. M COl10TT• T , TRACT 100TV 1.10•I4• SOOT•ttir TOR LAST rt.T )1.11 TAR TO Tot Oecn Seal.OF 10V1Rl•T .IIT ITSIRI LINT OI tall Lof•A IIRASCI N 11.11 RR TO A COR1.1 CONCATO TO RAKE POOR O••11•0t•Pan ALMPt MIS PORN StALI• 101.11 PINT Tot Pectins,'OATIN A WIN OF 111.11 PORI Root IC,tml*l1 TO TS TwM POINT N lilIO1N1 Tess or. 1.16.1at LAIR 116.M All ownowtSTOLT its.MIA Nos"M AMC DISTANCE O/11e.N/NR FIR, Rt. PROT Y0.11 FUIT/ TOT,', •NTi RNe0CI A CIRl1L AN...O/ 1 .0)..0• TV • POINT Or CoereWl 1•1.•11. OIST 210 Ion Ti Tot fafTl PAP.,. of TO.TTPlSTT .1.T Cu..!, OOTF••Trltl AtON A ROTC u0110 • RADIOS OP ITRRI TOI.C/Noun 10•)I•0/• lADT ALPa SAID 0AAc11 111.61 81,' • 1.11 TI.AA AW SIRtM Or ALSO IIT TenCa a comuu.AKLi A in TWO POINT 0/16..01R. or •RYAS•/ Ron POIR 1•09•I1• AAA, 104.11 •TAR A Ri 1O611. . AAAG,o or Moot /RV . STri, TNCR Rewfs 0/•90.11* LAST SOT OdfA1ST )/,DN SWANS,'R. .N...'ff.moot S410 RORP TwsR1■A Ra O�1RIN. Let certoivO 160...1 ORA..TACT. La LI, • LCLJ • TUT newt.N SLoa /Of Tel PLAT N 0.4100.P 1ee11.OA MIL. InAT Poo..N Stan /M MI OCAS OF 1.a m,..Iol+i MIL- LIA iso....lLL 1Aso N Sawa Li Letous= IN roUa1 IN or run. LS 11 I .01T1a1 TA.OF ffVlM avow.AD•Ros Ivow. IN O/PLAT. 8NLA II AR 11. I o..N LiR mPrIll. DLaSOOTO0. IYCI11O AS PMlu 11 u0 11, A.m.N as.MART.SYOS INO1ON. NK11In AS ,MAPS l M.O.. •1O11R1N •T TM Is1T1AAR DO.. SI L. I •I 1110 ILO. 1I C0 4ItCIN AT TINS SONToLAST canon N Ie? 1 0/ .All ILK, 1, ROC•Vern 01•o.•N• LAN 101.10 1ST?Ala.nI SAIT LINT N RSWI SOD.I•N•N•IAIT ALP.Tit TAN LIDS N loft I A.I N MSS LR I •01f1YtM N . 1./1 PM I.►CUM COACATS n nO Salo KL.CO I A lin&ILI N 1111.L1 PLR,Togo.P0VT1 01.11•II• 0.4710R111 PATEN • BASSOS OF SI.. fin/ Tuel ONnf1.T, ilR )11.11 'SR n Ill IMn OANI/Or 100Tso1IT II.T ITtRs I4OTw0OTa11. WO 0Y1S0LO A{Se Sail MO LS SAC PIIAKI OF Tea Dorn ll•)/•N•osOT Mel,IA.HOTS MMAOl1 IN.l' ',it's ...N In.Timm.•C_Tool Anti N N•1O•)1•n T.006nfaL4 To 1R&n I•.....• LAST 111.. SLAT. 1.0C1 PO.. IS•It•.1• DANII Of SOvyflRy Ion stern, neon wens Ol•10.11• otST 0a0T 1100.01 If11 Tote Moroi 1•M•Il•1RIt 111.N IIR T T■ ALY•1 Sall PAPS. 111.N EMT Ti TOO IDITILAN a10Oa1 N let•Of Mora NAM.N 111.TwO.T 11R&TUTS TOO.MOOTS N•I?•Ir• 1.10 PLO, II Toe.t1 Oat.11•1••l.t Volt WOO tel SA.Lilt N or.ALSO SAID...I. I....POST TO Tf TIM POI,'o1 annasNI 1Ai, let•A SI/TASCt O/ 91.11 FITS Ti A M0R CSKAOI Ti n) RC0c0 POOT1 1.10.11• SLOT 111.0* ran, Raft. DMT •oelitfR MA1100•WiM N 410.)1 FIST/ To.. DO.RsfLT ANS VCR 110.11 Forts ROWS t.OS Soo 1•N u•11•nut 11..N TROT T solo 1001 LYS •all COSTS Al AK II1TSPeI N $10.00 Ill Dorn OAs0[S1 Toot Scrr.66•111l1• LAST 1N.0I ISR Ti RA TWO RIo*1 A copyAL ANY N ll•ST•..•TO A POINT OI CO•VPaI Mot POI,'OI IK10.110. TANS MT elfin A LAO10I OF 466.I1 ROT, TASKS ALDN 0A10 . Cowell U LAC Daria1C1 Of 60.40 Ian TINT&A C.lT*AL 510.6L11 0/ IIT CONTAINS )1.040 SO.1M1 ran. •.•..•lilt T1K1 sown 61•14•41• PAR 111.1I SLR, nefn SOW. • 1•ST•1)•NIT 1O.06 Peril TOKE SOAR.61.10•47. LAST Ti Tel OOIRIN. LOT CO.RLIN 111.401 ROARS ORR. MET-I. Twat PeRia N Dlrl1 1 N tel PLAT N 1801813.100...sr MIL• Lit lano.firroIAL FAu N Rooms Al sRVNa to ROU. IN Of PLAT. .0411 II AR 11, "ROM N SIR Man....... 0f0C111O&a rowan. • • conCIN AT Tot &Lr 1t. ST M0A ONA Net L. I OF IA. u.001 I, tOf1t OnTMKO 1 , 1•.••N•WI.ALES TOSS LAN LISL N LAt I N LAis DLOCI I •IIRAftt or 111.06 Ptetl T1K1...TO 1...1.0i•VEST RAT rvfta of Ito. /Of OR PLAT OW WALTMTAN lOITIOI NIL- 111.06 Ftp, REWO MOM 1•11.0•0• SAO 1).l) FIR/ TARTS 1ORTO LLA 1mA.Tlai SUM DI 5OTa AS plan.IV rOI.MO 100 N FLAT. .....•f1• WOW' 101.01 ISR, To.Ct rtTTO 1•IS•00. ,SOT 41.// . runs Il•A 11, ►...OF LIST C1tMryT, VASARGTOO, OSufa.n AS PORI TACT DOOM Il•t1•1I.OUR 111.10 pin A TOO VCR LIP,N FOLIO.. RC LAIR O11.f1 FIR or tan elan 1 AR Tot ROI RIOT Or OK11- NINO, ROW,Aeon 1•0•N•LAt 011./1 Ion TO TWO ODOR Lilt or IIl1O0I00 AT tel 10OT1111T COUO1 OF LOT 1 OF SAID &LOCI Is L.1 of IRIS DLO.. I/ T,KI I..T 11.10•61•II.T ALSN •SAS RRC1 Orof1 I•N•N•ISOT ALAS TR LAST LUO or LOf 101 SAS■ Ow. AIMS AN In r11TSALT MOKAsi•Ra 210.11 Iln TO Tort 111 O LOCA I •OIOTLSCI Or 114.14 FOR, ROCS RAT. 11•00.11• VAR AA•OI■N LAN&TIRO, Toro. DI.n I•01•11•slit 211.4, ICRI )I1.14 rant Rea Dan 1.00•00• LAST 11.01 SIR, ROMS POPS& R.N.LAA011. tall LAlTt1Ll manta OW.00•10.10• oIR I11.01 11 11 11• 0tST 191.110 SIR, non' 00010 1.11•119• SLAT 41.1/ //R T Toe 0011R1e0 OW A eel-Taal.NO.CODCn?t Ti rail SIR PSRI ROWS POOR 11•00.11.OR/110.16 rill TO Toll MOST LIPS N ,U611.A RAN.Or 1.11.111 PIN. Intl No.L11N tn.cnn!C ViT Vol LAST M.S. Tsn Mo. 1•141•If• LA.Moos 1.111 lIn L71/ AN 0.. ran OOTnLT OF taIS LA,t.SL,1YN11 io 1•IISL Lint - .SLIP ,SOT n Il Pwf1 LIPS Or LOT 1 N tail 111OC1 11 Rowell TNuca tan 0KIR1N SIA M OW.01•N•01• LARI, ROCS SWIM. sour.•t•ls•.1• .At ItOW tall MOOR LINT 11.11 FAST T•TOOTS TALI 01.10 /tit SLON SAID 901OR T00010 A COOTS&L AMMO 0/ 000CSTI A Tel 10OT0 NATIN A 1.1.111 N N1.11 V•ns 0i•11•)•• TO roe 0101111N Or A COOfW NOVO CO.CLet TV TR • .or RATIO,•11.1M N 064.'1 ICRI ROCS M.RIISLT 50..0 Ion TtK0 ,AOTNLT ALONG SAID COOTS AA AK Ole/fort 110.11 Ian .LON MAID CVITI ROOMS,A (1OT5AL ANU OF 64•10•1l•I TIKi ToORICA A corr1Al•1U N 10.11•11•i R5 01 OW11 Mr•f0•1t•LAST loin. 11•10•11• VITT IT...1 /In TO SATO CAST OLN111 OF LINO 117.11 Fit: Tmid Frsn I•0.0•11•any u.N TOR, TOOK, LOUT. tetNO AA.n1 SKININ or A Roe&rsn wt CRT{COKAel TO Toe 07•/0.11•Sari 161.04 TAR A n/SOOIRIN. LAST MOUO A 8.11M N 10111.01 FIR IA SYIS&LIot T1000C.1 SAID I4:111.11f0 ORS 01.11.01•WONT), nnCI 00VT1R1LT A1000 LOT COWTSIel 111,111 0011111 ran. SAID CURT AN Ai DISTIL/Kt 01 11.11 FIST TO tel IO.R. LION Of Lot l of sass I1OCe a: n..co OWTI 00•00.16• [AST AL*. SAID u.R,1.1O1 21 TER! L sewn,I• • - RAT 1Ie..S Tr., ...DONo O es LAST 1 N•N A 1••)I'11• ST 101. . SARI Trott worm I....... LAST 141.11 POST A rag Ti00 POINT N sninan. LOT LVTA Or ))6./11 6421.0/PAR. I TUS T Poo..Or•Locs 1 N TO PLAT or 0.1LiK1P Rrilru MIL- • LI• I.OUTTOIAL rue or 1..0 Al ammo.Is POLY.. 1N or PLATS. Idir_Il -- ACT 11 Sae 13. ouw&Dt N Rit CODATS. I•o1111.-ll0, DC.PIDa LI PCLL0111 TAT POOTION N ILOa I N tel RAT Or oaLIOQA..&Mini,MIL. Li•IPOY.TIAL'AAA or Ion.AS Masora IN SOLON,AN N FLAT. 0000tOCI144 •T.r IOOTOtAST C0.011 Or LOT I OI SAIt D1SCO II PACTS II ISO 11, ASCO.N N Site I0mR,1.0s!IC?00, DLLCi!IO AS R1.e1 sown 1.10•00•or,'AIO.Y R1 LAST LIII Or LOT I Or 1•11 1OLAP01 LOCI) A DI...N 111.01/lit To Tel no.STIl OI IK1.11POt R0C1 Co1'T1a011 Fool t1.1I•48•• Ion 111.M1 Ir./ ROKI sort. T■ OO.R.tIOT ROOM 01 LOT• IN SATO SLAKE II • '.1•rtlT 11.11 I11T to n PORI.PO .05 or 60.0.1ST Ai. TI1K l .. 1•11• I..5 woo •1R AL.. Toll AR VifLT FOo1O0CATIec OI Stoll, T1t0CL 00It 61•l1•l1• DINT •LON SAID 05K10 IST.1/ SAID SATO LINO 111.41 FRR Ti TAR MRULT IIO/TTb/•D&1 AARCIN TOOT, TASK/ lOnTi 1.10011• at1T 116.06 TOLT1 TOIACI NOITS or Li.avow., Too..NOR.1•IT•1r•LAST 111.11 PRAT Ti•06T1 S•,1•01•rt•T 101.01 /CRC ',ROCS SOOT. 1.1.•18. VIlT 21..410 Moe-AIM Ti Tot IOVTISR lATIN A 1.6.1100 OI 11.06 FIR, nt0C1 SLR A Tot N0.0LKi1 O/IO.Ttffi!T.IR MR,'; TR CO NIT RI1140L1, PCOtLASTLALI, Sal WTALI SLOWS SAID CRRTC AO AOC EST •LOW SAID A •CSe 11.11 Itt?I T0..tt Noe,. DIRt5t1 O1./0 rt.Rroocl A C•1TOSL SNLO OF 0..00•N•TV nt 1▪, P f0.12 CAST 1Il.N IPRI TREE■Po1.1 00.11•91• OCR 101.61 IOVfILALT Sr Of.oRrV11T).n R01R/To..0017T41 Ir•/0.11• ROT, TCAtt PORTO 1.11•11• CAST 01.11 PCITI TRACT •ONTO LAST alit tall MONO RAMIS I0M.47 PITT A TAR t.o.T1PAR Co.. 0•01•l16 ICS,00.0) ft.TO Tot 000RC1R Conn OI LOT 1 01 CW MAID LOT•, ROCS Ae.RM 1.10•00•ASR•Ida Tot slut LINK OF 1A1C OLOCI I, Roc[•oo.11•10•Il• LAST LINT )0.00 F[R A Tot SAID LOT• A Dirt..DI 111.SO NOR n•OM.L0.CAr1 Ti TOT sofoLAlT Ceuta OF LOT 1 OF LAIC DLO. II REACT foots 11•01.11• 1WO 0/ )60.04 FIR, TnCO SOOT 'RIT A1e5C SAID M0w11 LID/ )01.1/ TER: ...cc Noe. 1o10•00 60yfootn0LT, MOO NTOTIALT Ate. SAID MVO U SAC OIOTLICI or IATT I.AS NCR, TMflct EMT,1.•I1•110 Off/1..70 tr.A RR 411.11 RR TrrUN A CORAL inLl Of It•3O•10•T T011.IKt1- r11T LINT oI RR LAST 1111.11 SIR 01 SAID DLOCt I1 Twaoct NOR NIN. 1.1•'N• CAST ALO.0 RID PLAT LINT 14).11 TER: ',RAC!, •Outs - • 1...9.11. LAST )01.10 TRR/ TRACT SOOT+ 1.1,09• •EMT 0).11 LOT Moral. 3O1.1f)10.1A•M It R. rfr7. ntoct IDLR1 u•0s•11• CA/T 11..0• PER: T+roCC so.T+ i•1e•es••rsT 1).•1 IrRI Rr.1 A.N.•.•e0.11• WT /1s..fart A RS nowt roll.or MKiorii. LOT CONTAINS III.III SWISS TILT. • 1 I. Sot(' . . - 1 VOL- 1161.1 F•ge KROLL MAP COLtP• . 16I BURLINGTON - NORTHERN a-z`• FILE NO. 8SP - 014-92 A FUNDING SITE PLAN _ =r', UTILITIES - ORIGINAL PLAT - OVERLAY 1. GJ SECTION 30, TW P. 23 N., RGE.5 E, W U. r;, SECTION 31 , TW P. 23 N. , RGE. 5 E. w M• •• ''.•.,;;,,, N • CITY Cr PENTON , KING COUNTY , WASNINGTON 10-_-c-. ..uu.roe rim 1 ux.�x S•H! 34 TH ST. /Y.tlt.Ot to.• r:�l,.iof)• t---- .... _ •- .now!' o.a, ( ... .'� r::°!. Y.T.: .wr • .•,,........- , O T: . ; I .0'I..OYJK.v.. IY.J--� •�:. : .r.O Y�-.;.[., 'L,w .0 t.0.3: l'F S I 40K fIn[t I.O.I..(/[.•L•, •»oo I Ir` t.OTxi..rases I .'g I Mi_10..1_. tYO,SP-378-79 .. ..•a i J 1 .� I 8 ; 1 $ PARCEL 8 -• LOT i • LOT 3 I • I 13I "• 8 a_p 6 / LOT I Il n.,r,1Y r, .. I a^ •try sons : - N0.0•t M.IL I ::3 SCALE ' I • 120. / I•■••• J' •4• .cni .0• s.w o !o Ip • 10�� j I ' / ;'9 LLCM. I I •RtT• ,� I )4 • 0/ MIMIC.14101.0 r. rPf.TO..•T I I - ••.'O' ,i --a'YTRn, [f.t TO t ■ I L. Y.ao STAY.. / CR•RO.•�>a0.r 0/• Yr. .AO..t••T.•L..• I 1 (►•nL( ,� / sot trxual.l. I .a. Snow 0...t1•w:.0 )...c! /� _ e•erlr..nw :t ,.....%�•. ........• geh a 1 Sign tAITAT tLn[.Yn'.L! 1 —q•Y 1S l:. 1 1 fn Y• TT. Tn0 rIC s la?001 •I-`• ..,-���y.••!p•.1 •.�.� —1 �• TN TYIII!LILM.T4.YY 1,.,`i /� t!1')0.r-t— ���..' �'• TS T..I/IO StwG • i — • ri-- t Q TY /Ynit Inn&.w N I b'YR�Or tw'r 10�T-- ;�� I i.•• • �•„L, [.R1T[S.T T•N 0004 f.,. J t01.■t VW 4/b•..N.t 01 t.. J T• Ttl.OM.S I I 10lh'•-••• NI..W.Ya1 F OOO..t.T w. ware. LtN`a MAW W ..., o,.10,...is 0 s It. imo ••.M COAT • I C7 w van"Vain Z I I.•f ODf.1RgRt. ��' l •I I v > 1 'I -t c;:I IN. vP Lam` • I 1 •• ..a ``�[,�: ,N II LOT P\ " `It 2 ;6 . ' JAI v• !� :: .a} S x� \!.i ~' a Y' of••r■n . i if T f C 0 f" t IW . J ,,i0s••• si ._) • +r I 'v7 T J i. LOTT • �• Is 2 L. M.P. Y IT - f0f Ti ••l .. :tg I ill: .Y 00' I. �q lain r—n.L4NTCAr.VTR ITT MeV I N•00 Y f ��• PI w' r p " .Y•014 t• II Mae CO4 NM ..•Y...N I1OC slY �.S s....1 • N IT..IL.rtfl ,'' II..IS 1.1 ;2 I 1 a • a J )O'Om?,tsar,nI.MVIW[.IT I W A[• •lO 1! n/netrchno•O. •• =VOW 0Im110O 0000•1r OS l•r an .Y[1-t[T v• • I• •ICPO r I L pa 0/01•0 •...., \n LOT• L ` I 1 • .)r, 4 1• •� 3 1 • •H ♦` PC..t•N-pr •j III100,00 SO IT •ji•. / III. 3 ` - -- to ` \ `\ ao arruTT runt TO.! 7 .• .S !o•1.4CO 0 r J•R.....m.e.r I•..t.. \ L O/T.n NO<Val.f. �Lj op'..R.O.O In 0 1 ..t A 1..0.N �N,.'A L..B nIIMWf-S11T OQwfwl nm10[. ' __-4 r.. '. N 01-. — _—� -t I A'11.1.1040•vr o....I.Pt. T a LOT 2 L.L.A-OL6-85 I ■.. lon' .Y Sr .- �. I r..FIIt4r YT1.O rp OIL r 14AbC10 •Y I W■ •N•N`�l• .1--0 u CC..I..YT.0. , • axslf S aTRITT fl,I0f•T rK-••• p!11 l•'O.••IDIpM O T..t 0,[Lr 11•-1 r lN-T,•,/•0. 5 . LOT oRi••1 g? LOT .,y r.• •T••..e III 13,v [•n T.•C tO'YTR.TT t...14 r[tT L370 0 ITi.Sf I NI TOOL. .t. +1' NO es:- slag• Ls1w.'le 1 • I S.W. -. ST ST. 1?0'00 tV horn0 MS b I •• • . I WL 161 PAGE-! it '� 1 KROLL µAP COUPA NT,INC. SEATTLE ,ur-Far" 161 f• nfcnte•L von? BURLINGTON NORTHERN mI •,▪te YIIJe.•tart •o. flex•YI..a :• •e.• won.. or..w• ,_ ftu...e.....ru - • A @1NDING 517E PLAN _ r� "CL1" " FILE NO. 85P - 014-92 '""1L mama. PARCEL CONFIGURATIONS N. T..fflt mama.se. T. Tt.O.t•....MY SECTION 30, TW P. 23 N. , RGE.5 E E. W.U. 1•°ac"^`u o • •O ono moo SECTION 31 • TW P. 23 N. , RGE.5 E, W.T.I. rw -- Nlltt[.mote:J.• N CITY OF RENTON , KING COUNTY , WASHINGTON r0 NOO.rm ...fUS.CO O IC•• :D Uf10 OK .t• I To•Il..ttt.D. •t•L•• ,.c.n L(.0\ S.W. 34 TN *MOWS..w• tot O ST. /sutt.eool. ':,p• Dy 1"I. -IOH IO Y•0-_--T �-{ -ti•I•]07l 1•.• •m0O I • 1 10(11.73 •.(•url elt7J - I . 1 tl' L•N M. I'R a • I 40•e OMIT r4r.it Ma I.•T ''T' ••If CO •-`- ' tr•fl.e1••T••U R 1 ^g l.wN 1 ••• I I •� • 1 o movr•. Tema I I Ir 1 II 1 • F-8 • 1 I LOT I/ 1 ' I 'E LOT /I II 8 �! 1 71 6 LOT I 0.'!!N II .. I a�w 3•t•U a ` Is: :p ,.D.O•(lot/t. ^S I i •r'. SCALE • I• • 120• • • b I'• '� �'� •NI •c•u e.S .02 F�_,-- le� :I I 1 I $[ , I it/ -1tLs-+• • t/ :II'I 1 yell0 .�♦ P� •Tt�t•eni v�/�•• (■Ifll•D•■ T•.e• 7 ` yT.! -�••� p, ,�,11L_ 1_•s;se .. _ y y: 1 / -1 -fit fe-�f• .7 so seems,tier 19973 •= W I f.R•rt•w/rN ODCWerf, � l •'• .13...••to'eve.;”(se a 10 t L•,D2t' • _'L 1 8 tts•Io w wm•aror I C7It t•t .r, I . • • !Iiqo : ,1, LOT -8 et 1 I try C9 •.fnlwn Y +8 • vile AWACS r. _: �,. La .I, 8 p iiS m•^ y' 1 J / Z ( told —1 r— • 1 Q J LOT ! I k. - • 1 • • 7 'E S 1.•anTa:raw 1 i L._ af•ns e.rlroas I 1 . Ma PII Ol It. —- y� �.�A i9 CI Irrf 000.r..r 1 • • •L •tll•c.(• ' I —e WI.Vc. •--`�18 11 75 ! �.ero:••1••ai "'t b •NOD'-. tt,, -.w•oo fl.{•1 a _yr•N_ •O' 1: 1 I I` •-f WO§M L1 . — � �L • 1 1 I x; ;R I Q :x-; • 1 a I W ,,! �S s I 1' a•;_ DEVIL ;� I I , Z 1••x' 1 j) • I J • ; 1, •.. I `L',1.2113 \ it i` LOT , G-tR-9t • 3 • f...,.... i. \v.•• N• •�\� (1•melt, i 7 1.11e ,l.tl• K•ttSTS,111 SO IT �; .i • 1 V• 'R ', A I.rILT Orl A It • • oo 1 i s m•q•a•\ \ 8$ I ,.2 .•res a.rtrmor •B A • :; V'Mr - �� L—Leo v_� \: t� £$ 'Iv j a `..o «.s.T5 � •:!..1:gf�:x• 'IO !-• — :: se, �Rftr.ar •— 1 I • MC. �'•INN I ...KC.31 -..� if 1 ♦ I TO-••tlo•0.K.I O•N/f0 R•1. lz 1 • r Al�,• ....yore[ '.fa : ••YILO•.• !t t••Lr to a rq...000.00N -91 p ____ 53 1.►r L-b tb•DCr Yr rot CO•CC(it A S - •Qt9•OTILOT UIt.UR • N•/'��" N..•I 00!I[. r •. IIrPr R�rD...O/M OOCWeIf ~, '� LK..f,•It.0••I TO TO flee • 8.' LOT °R1..18? LOT 1 row .(11 neD m•CC.0 ITC • o A 6 0 •I?8 4 8'2S _ I I I nmo is n a l ^ba+.omis rT-A - _ 1 ao.N oc s I �Og-zzi,e 0 ` ••P_. . IT .1 fN••i•s•. •; •_ In ll'1..•rl TO•S.Irt•1•0M0I •••••1 ••••ar'.i -�.N•r__I. -.'Le •t sty... Py TT •5'+belt•0]•.11. loot...-.. Iw•ii or t ww•IP Or e•.... •0.0.en•30. 1 • •toll.O• . W I[ @rrlw.r cy.rwlL [!ilex V•QLt!q TO �+A USm DD•t rn• .� L.., S.W. 41 ST ST. l,.rt D...,..l•KC r e•.II � , ooc••••1.0. . . ff WAITS •DODD.00.1 1 TTMt4 •R•etf l C. 0.K.Ileso oroc,Q.••t Mt Moo n0ll Ie001 SMCCT EASEMf f i1 The Grantor, GLACIER PARK COMP"NY, o Minnesota corporation, herein- after coiled Grantor, for oi.d in consideration of Ten and no/100 Dollars (S10.00) to it paid, and the agreements herein contoined, does hereby grant to BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, hereinafter called Grantee, eusen.e..t for roilrood purposes upon the following described premiss situated in King County, Washington: Parcel 1 - All that part of the SE1 SW; of Section 25, Township 23 North, Range 4 East W.M., lying east of the 100 foot right of way of Burlington Northern Inc., north of the _ th line of so:d section, west of o line parallel to and 267 feet east of the east line of -v said 100 foot right of way and southwesterly of o line lying 20 �• feet northeasterly measured parallel and rodioily and all that port of Lot 7, Block 9, Burlington Nor Ind Pk Renton II recorded :0 in King County records July 24, 1979, undo 7907240890 lying southwesterly o line lying 20 feet northeasterly measured parallel and radially from the following described centerline: Beginning at heodblock of No. 16 turnout of Engineer Survey Station 997+37.7 = 0+00; thence southerly through said No. 16 turnout to the left of Stecnco Spur Trock to beginning of curve of - Station 1+61 .5; thence along a 6°curve to'the left-through on angle of 2° 24' to o point of reverse curve at Station 2+01; thence along a 6° 00' curve to the right Through on angle of 5° 59' to Station 3+00.7 to end of curve and point of tangent; thence snuffled), along .aid gcnt to point of curve at Station 6+65.4; thence along 7° 30' curve to the left through on angle of 6° 22' to Station 7+50.3 to end of curve and poir' of tangent; thence along said tangent to beginning of curve at Station 7+67.6; thence southeasterly along 13° 14' curve to the lefr through an angle of 40° 04' to end of curve at Station 10-770.4; thence along o tangent to heodblock of Station 10.96.6 = 0-00 of lead track to Orillio Industrial Pork; thence along a No. 9 turnout to the left to heel of frog and beginning of curve of Station 0+81 .9; thence southeasterly an-! easterly along a 12° 30' curve to the left thrr.ugh on angle of 36° 48' 35" to end of curve and point of tongencv at Station 3+76.4; thence easterly 100 feet along said tangent parallel to one; dislor.ce 35 feet from the south line of Section 25, Township 23 North. Range 4 East W.M. and end of centerline and description. Parcel 2 - Railroad r:3hts of woy situated in Sections 30 ord 31, Township 23 North, Range 5 Eost W.M., located oll within the plot of Burlington Northern Orillio Industriol Pork of Renton Division I, recorded in King County records 9-25-78 undr '7909250902. Parcel 3 - Railroad rights of way situated in Section 30, Township 23 North, Range 5 East W.M. and Section 25, Township 23 North, Kange 4 East W.M., located all within said plot of Burlington Nor Ind Pk Renton I I. • 1. 1 . • - - _ IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grunt°, hos coined th;s instrunw•r+t to be executed b) its proper officers and ih co,x rute seal to be he/curio affixed this 13rh doy of _ October , 1981 ' :LACIER PARK COMPANY By e {1 President Attest: „ 't - /i�':':� A stunt Secretary G) - C) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. CO County of Romney On this 13th day of October , 1981, before me personally oppeored ' J. C. Kenody and R. J. Morin to me known to be President and Assistant Secretory-of the corporation that executed the -. .. within and foregoing instrument and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation for the uses and purposes therein mentioned and on oath stated that they were authorized to execute the said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporotion. IN WITNESS WHEREOF. I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my officio; seal the day and year first above written. • • ....,.....»«......... / . C.`.L•Ce- L ;. • . • • Notary Public in and for the State of Minnesota, residing of St. Paul. Retuxe to: Mr. R.D. Larson, !tanager tri Property Monagesaent, Burlington Northern R.R. TILED fir ?-.�:'' at ReQ�leSt Roos 720 Central Building Seattle, Washington 98104 "ram -- - .. ,- Aist • • S,. 1 � .__ . • C i • 1 • . i . rr-. o- PARTIAL RELEASE OF EASEMENT THIS INDENTURE,made this 3rd day of March, 1992, by and between the $ BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY(formerly Burlington s Northern Inc.),a Delaware corporation,GRANTOR,and BURLINGTON e NORTHERN RAILROAD PROPERTIES INC.,a Delaware corporation ,of 1011 Western Avenue,Seattle,Washington 98104,GRANTEE, WHEREAS,by Easement recorded in King County as Document No. 8110210541,Glacier Park CompaL,y,a Minnesota corporation'(predecessor in interest to Burlington Northern Railroad Properties Inc).granted unto Burlington Northern Railroad Company an easement for railroad purposes including the right to construct,maintain and improve railroad trackage over certain property located in the Orillia Industrial Park of Renton,Division 1,King County,Washington; GRANTOR no longer requires.a portion of said easement for _ _1 -_ l WHEREAS. railroad purposes and is willing to release unto GRANTEE all of its right,title and I interest in and to that portion of said easement; .. I NOW THEREFORE,the GRANTOR,for and in consideration of the sum of g C''r% One and No/100 Dolhrs($1.00),to it in hand paid,the receipt of which is hereby ; kt[ ti acknowledged,does hereby gUITCLAIM and RELEASE unto the GRANTEE,all of its right,title and interest in and to a portion of said easement shown shaded on the Nattached Exhibit'B" which said portion of easement shown on said Exhibit"B" Cr) encumbers the real property legally described on the attached Exhibit"A",both O attached bereto and by this reference made a part hereof; Cu ) IN WITNESS WHEREOF,said GRANTOR has caused this instrument to be s signed by its Director Operations,attested by its Assistant Secretary,and its J corporate seal to be hereto affixed on the day and year first above written. i. BURLINGTON NORTHERN 1 RAILROAD COMPANY BY Vf. X, (14..41 'i B.L.Nichhhhhots Director Operation is ATTE T: _BYiLu.#1r)1/4 I _ H. Vasq uez Assistant Secretary EXu1SE TAX NOT RED' ,gip -XJ:;Co Records Glvts a', g 7.1.NEINVIPOI ! • . W I, o ' STATE OF TEXAS ) IIlig v, )ss. • COUN'r'Y OFTARRANT ) • •. I On this 3rd day of March,1992,before me personally came B.L.Nichols, Director Operations,and V.H.Vasquez,Assistant Secretary,of the above named • t corporation,Burlington Northern Railroad Company,who are to me known to be _ such Director Operations and Assistant Secretary of said corporation and • to i ' acknowledged that they executed the foregoing instrument as such officers and as • "'. v L, the free act and deed of said corporation by its authority. J O 7LLCILLJ (trt..1 -1-- W I-i u. Notary Public. ::•;A. isi i 4"t'-• My commission expires: f zlzo f Q"1' _ •' • v' ... AA)t rsa+ou ..F.,": ' ►-W• 1 • Watery►tIL10 WY N Tway ' F-s• 1 z F- Tilia. Lotts...u.e err»CAN 30.MI - W Q7 N- .` W L- O , r. =p.-N { u.1-• C C -) CD i I.,, (NJ O) it O II 1 ' C . [ _ - 7 - .. .. .. - .- - _. '. • • EXHIBIT A • • PARCEL A: THAT PORTION OF BURLINGTON NORTHERN ORILLIA INDUSTRIAL PARK OF RENTON DIVISION• a: I , AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 108 OF PLATS, PAGES 12 AND 13, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY. DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: .LOTS 1. 2. 3,• 6, 7 AND 8 .IN BLOCK 2 .+s:'.:.. TOGETHER WITH LOT 2 OF CITY OF RENTON LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. LLA-016-85 RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 8602139001: ( • AND TOGETHER WITH ALL OF THE RAILROAD RIGHTS-OF-WAY LYING ADJACENT TO LOTS 1, • •.': CV 2, 3. 4, 5, 8, 7. 8 AND 9 IN SAID BLOCK 2 AND ADJACENT TO LOTS 1 AND 2 OF CITY C'''7 OF RENTON LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. LT..A-016-85 RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY O RECORDING NO. 8602139001: AND ADJACENT TO PARCELS A AND B OF SHORT PLAT NO. CV CT) 378-79, ACCORDING TO THE SHORT PLAT RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 7909249001: SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING. STATE OF WASHINGTON. • PARCEL B: PARCEL B OF SHORT PLAT NO. 378-79. ACCORDING TO THE SHORT PLAT RECORDED UNDER KING COUN1Y RECORDING NO. 7909249001; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. • / • ` • • • • 21/47 i; 1 I MQI'IL. a t Ili. UVVUI•IGfls AnII1A✓ I1..vlV II, ..VJ.. �.LL/N• 11M1� Maw NVI•VI. Y II IS ".JE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. -, ./ I -, 92032002T3 1 �� L I MO AVE),IUE` i 1 1 r . o A I r 0 �• \$, tD A I I w 1 co \ A rii"•' - !ill . pi r A r A `�`?1--- si m . Z ()-. A v I� N k r 8 � EP [I 1 Z I` D L I .i . _ ' I CA5T V4L•L�Y 141�i9WAY D cic 1 0 & �- • • WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: Office of the City Clerk Renton Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 EASEMENT FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL <7 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE For and in consideration of Ten Dollars and other good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the GRANTOR, POWELL-ORILLIA ASSOCIATES, a Washington general partnership, hereby conveys and quitclaims to the GRANTEE, THE CITY OF RENTON, a municipal corporation of King County, Washington, a N3 perpetual, non-exclusive easement for traffic signal operations and maintenance over, upon and under the surface of the real property rg located in King County, Washington, more particularly described in CD attached Exhibit A, incorporated herein by this reference (the "Easement Property") . The Grantee, its successors and assigns, shall have the right, c without prior notice or proceeding at law, at such times as may be c O necessary, to enter upon the Easement Property for the purpose of C�2 constructing, maintaining, repairing, or altering, or making any C) connections with the traffic signal system to be located on the Easement Property, without incurring any legal obligations or liability therefore; provided, that any such construction, maintenance, repairs or alterations shall be accomplished in such a manner that the private improvements existing on the Easement Property or any other property of Grantor shall not be disturbed or damaged, and if disturbed or damaged will be replaced in as good a condition as they were immediately before the property was entered upon by the Grantee. Grantor shall have the right to fully use and enjoy the Easement Property, including the right to use the surface of the Easement Property if _ such use does not interfere with the installation, use and maintenance of the traffic signal system on the Easement Property. The Grantor may construct a road over the Easement Property but shall not erect any buildings or structures over, under or across the Easement Property as long as the traffic system on the Easement Property is in existence. This Easement shall terminate if the traffic signal system on the Easement LL Property is ever permanently abandoned by the Grantee. AT REQLrsr OF FLED D FOR RECORD , :CE CO. 1754/005:6/29/92:W516 MERICA'ITI'LE IN 1..yiw OrI l.E.1 'I1 `IS320 loath Ave. NE p Q. BOX 1493 1 o • L_� gellewe, WA 98� rut) BY: "A A -n-rr l� un � 11:L IIMVI4R� - This Easement is a covenant running with the land and shall be binding on Grantor, its successors and assigns. Grantor covenants that it is the lawful owner of the Easement Property and has the good and lawful right to execute this Easement. DATED this c,. day of June, 1992 POWELL-ORILLIA ASSOCIATES, a Washington general partnership By I Powe 1, r 1 Partner By P ter W. Powell, General Partner C N O GD C, N a, -2- 1754/005:6/23/92:DW516 Pow-Oril.Esse .7 n aid-2A inns - , STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. COUNTY OF KING ) On this 2 Co day of � _.) , 1992, before me, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared Lloyd W. Powell, to me known to be the General Partner of Powell-Orillia Associates, a Washington general partnership, the partnership named in and which executed the foregoing instrument; and he acknowledged to me that he signed the same as the free and voluntary act and deed of said partnership for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that the person appearing before me and making this acknowledgment is the person whose true signature appears on this document. WITNESS my hand and official seal the day and year in this certificate above written. \ • ,JANICE TECHMACHER b NOlory pLb°`STATE OF WASHINGTONNbTA1tY PUBLIC in and for e • ate f. h,canr l , a+on E" Washington, residing at ,July 10. 1994 My commission expires: 7-lD•9l CD 04 ^J t", GO O 04 0) -3- 1754/005:6/23/92:DY516 Pw-Orll.Esse B`ii 3? BY: TP.O&C.YIKA TL • • STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. COUNTY OF KING On this c day of , 1992, before me, a Notary Public in and for the Stat of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared Peter W. Powell, to me known to be the General Partner of Powell-Orillia Associates, a Washington general partnership, the partnership named in and which executed the foregoing instrument; and he acknowledged to me that he signed the same as the free and voluntary act and deed of said partnership for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that the person appearing before me and making this acknowledgment is the person whose true signature appears on this document. WITNESS my hand and official seal the day and year in this certificate above written. JANICE TLSCHMACHER N PUBLIC in and for Q ate of STATE O W TON Washington, residing at • A_‘e ►ay My commission expires: (0' col O O h2 -4- 1754/005:6/23/92:DV516 Pow-Oril.Eose F` aBY: TPIWERrk II KW-2n 4nnn . . • _.:: dir- . EXHIBIT A BUSH, ROED& HITCHINGS, INC. Legal Description far Traffic Signal Easement SIGNALIZATION EASEMENT DESCRIPTION THAT PORTION OF LOT 7 OF BURLINGTON NORTHERN, A��C66C[[ORDOINGBTO ODTHE HE BINDING SITE PLAN THEREOF RECORDED INRV VOLUME UME EKING COUNTY, F SITE PLANS, PAGES THROUGH )__. WASHINGTON, DESCRIBES-KS FOLLOWS: R SAID LOT 7; THENCE 001°50r'09NG EAST H18 S00 T FEET TALONG ETHE F NORTH AT TE EAST LINE THEREOF TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTHEAST HAVING A RADIUS .OF 120.00 FEET (A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID BEGINNING BEARS SOUTH 00°54'35" WEST) ; THENCE WESTERLY AND NORTHWESTERLY LE OF 109 . 33 FE ET ALONG SAD THENCE NORTHI 6°53'217V" WEST 173.08 FEET TO HETHROUGH A CENTRAL GBEGIN- NING OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 120.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY 25.92 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 12°22'37" TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGIN- NING; THENCE SOUTH 40°44'07" 19.96ALOG A LINE DIAL TO THE PRECEDING CURVE TO THEW BEGINNING OFET A NON-TAN ENT CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHEAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 35. 19 FEET (A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID BEGINNING BEARS NORTH 15°34'21" EAST) ; THENCE WESTERLY, SOUTHWESTERLY AND SOUTHERLY 57.57 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 93°44 ' 10" TO A POINT OF CUSP ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 7; THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERLY ALLINE T THE FOLFELOWING THE BOCOURSES: OF A CDTHENCE NORTH 11 50 11 r- CURVE CONCAVE TO THE WEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 806.74 FEET; N THENCE NORTHERLY 65.87 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL O ANGLERH A 04°40'41"G TRADIUSINT OF OF 5 c00 PFEE'TH A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE (A RADIAL LINE THROUGH C'� NORTHEAST HAVING A (ID SAID POINT OF CUSP BEARS NORTH 82°50'29" WEST) ; CCD4 THENCE SOUTHERLY AND SOUTHEASTERLY 43.16 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE 01 THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF . 0°3 9 '02"HEST TOHA THE HE BEGINNINGB OFF 135RE- VERSE CURVE CONCAVE TO THE 0 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY 33.52 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CEN- TRAL ANGLE OF 14°13'38" TO A RADIAL LINE OF SAID CURVE WHICH BEARS NORTH 40°44'07" EAST; THENCE SOUTH 40°44 '07" WEST 15.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. THE PARCEL DESCRIBED ABOVE CONTAINS 2,376 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. JE-34►A-Hick. POWELL DEVELOPMENT j * �pfWuh14- -/-. % BURLINGTON -NORTHERN BSP - ��A. WILLIAM A. HICKOX, P.L.S. • / BRH JOB NO. 91407.08/SUR54B JUNE 25, 1992 f '' 6 25-9z ° ' '' ST . ' YW1 R. �.k+ tRri in. a .- :�. 11 ts1.�. CAM `.. - :..._.,..... '.:.•.::: '. . :�.; ..;..'.• .:. .:-.. - ... .. .-....... ir . 8r SIGNALIZATION EASEMENT SKETCH PREPARED FOR POWELL DEVELOPMENT CO. WTC8NC OHO� i ff. e= 70•39'oz• SEAL 7 1 .35' tki' , ---L.43./6' II- 7989�C� • A. /4°/3'38" 1SH►NG Q \ /R=/35. A:at•�, • L=33.sz R. 806.74' (5 40'44'07'W(R) /5.00' L= 65.87' ��; A=/2.22137' PC; 1'� R= /20' kl ' ` ��.'T L. 25.92' om —540.44'07"W(,2) /9.96. Q vt _ % ; T.P. O.13. /'=50' R' 35 9'i0 \.0....qs..L' 57.57' 1 LOT ),. 7 0� Burlington Northern f3i ing Site Plan c Vol , Pgs. \▪b . - W • 4,/Og3 . G R. R. R.O.W. IQ CI S.CD 3��JaFw�y��40 ' • O N BUSH,ROED&HITCHINGS,INC. 01 1, CIVIL ENGINEERS i LAND SURVEYORS 1 % i�n7 16-5-1Z seArnc.w.vrw*ow 123-4144 f s R ' CLC YAM 91407.08 JUTE 26,1992 AL LATE dig Z ' EXPIRES 1/17/.1 • , 1 a.,. ..... //1,0 , - Fin : .I' 11101 2A inn') ' T 'TICE: I► THE DOCUP". i T..15 is.14E IS LIISS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE �I DUE TO l.._ JLITY CI: TETEE. ,r.GCUXE�'T. � � •:r ;� '.4.sW,-..,4+.•..:....,7 +mr., is .. �'. �r,: •:.'....'.• • 4‹.%' g(00/ 6/e6/rD67/ -// '(6.- •I. 9:Z06302702 yak 1j ioa • rf o rt' V r••o t. M ce i+ i n y, •, g ZIPO i • r-71 b: le IO N ' t O O 0 :Z1 (� • �_ O Ii� M A s OeµYC m L R r 94 ' • -- DI nos ,. al O � 1Nw r+i+e n� 00o~ r F it ► f. r I�' .:....,.....i....... . 1iij i Qr ~ xy.R i it' . le. __� i I WI M • j wA. hh z InMinaill RECIPROCAL EASEMENT AGREEMENT WITH COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS i11 t TABLE Or CONTENTS Paae r RECITALS 1 A. rC Property_ 1 • B. powell Property 1 C. $hoDoina Center 1 4 D. �r 1 E. purpose :W ARTICLS 1 - DEFINITION OT EXCLUSIVE BUILDING AREA AND COMMON u - - _ ..AREA... .. .. .. .. _ 2• - _ - • 1.1 Exclusive gnildina Area. 2 2. m 1.2 Common Area ,n• 1.3 ' Conversion to-Common Area ~ ARTICLE 2 - USE 2 z 2.1 prohibited Uses 2 2.2 Further Restrictions 3 ' Csl 2.3 permitted Uses 3 , j W P. ARTICLE 3 - BUILDINGS 4 ',ni▪ t,' ej 3.1 yocatioq 4 1p 3.2 Aire Protection 5 c ''J CD 3.3 Damage or Destruction -. 2 5 ,.,►.. ARTICLE 4 - COMMON AREA USE 5 • �' • • n..�... • sue- -a- 4. 7ran� o� u:s 5 • i;.:'' CI 4.2 Usq 6 :,,s- 4.3 cCe@a 6 - (a) NO Barriers •' , (b) $tacing tpr Construction 6 4.4 Limitations on Use _ 6 .•• (a) Customers 6 - (b) gmplovees 7 o (c) General 7 (d) S_F.2.2 7 0 4.5 Utility and Service Easements 7 i:�, 4.6 ,Signs 7 • '-' . 4.7 Qvteide Merchandising 8 .^ - ARTICLE S - COMMON AREA DSVSLOPXXXT 9 •. 5.1 Development Timing - 9 t r aoos:ei t 7it7:wn a MCIM-*y.rwt - • • O • 1 .,... • .=4K . . :•t,;� is r• •: Y.. ARTICLE 8 - COMMON AREA MAINTENANCE 9 6.1 MaintenangA_Ltspclards 9 6.2 Maintenance by Agent 10 ARTICLE 7 - INDEMNIFICATION, I:J8URANCE 10 1 7.1 Owner's Indemnification 10 7.2 Insurance 10 . 1 11 1 ARTICLE 8 - REALTY TAXES AND ASSE88).E JTB 1 8.1 Real Estate Taxes and Assessments 11 ARTICLE 9 - =INERT DOMAIN 11 9.1 Owner's Right to Award 11 9.2 Collateral Claims 11 9.3 Restoration of Common Areas 12 cL.) ARTICLE 10 -. CANCELLATION, MODIFICATION, DURATION 12 r= 10.1 Cancellation or Modification - - 12 - z 10.2 Duration _.. ._ 12 N ` H ARTICLE 11 - RELEASE YROX LIABILITY 12 . 11.1 Release from Liability 12 11 ARTICLE 12 - DEFAULT 12 � t 12.1 Default 12 W 12.2 Remedies for Default 12 1`W 12.3 Attorneys' Pees 14 12.4 Governina Law 14 1N ..“..$ ',, N ARTICLE 13 - NOTICES 14 • 1 VI 0 13.1 Notices 14 C . LE 14 - LENnER PPOTECT1ex 7S Cr.-• .. J+PTh • 1:;:11 r co)c 14.1 Lender Protection 15 -:- CD 15 _, 0 ARTICLE IS - GENERAL PROVISIONS '` ', N 15.1 No Covenant to Operate 15 CT) 15.2 Runnina of Benefits _ and Servitudes. Rights of ,.. ' •' Nuccessors 15 15.3 Not a Public Dedication 15 t 0 15.4 Document Execution and Change 16 W 15.5 No Joint Ventura 15 c 15.6 Reasonableness pf Corsent 16 IM 15.7 Lot 1 - 16 -- 15.8 .1iMiasroarti 16 - 15.9 No Consents 17 15.10 }1etlanda 17 "' 15.11 Let_7. - 17 1 • , -ii- • 17S</ouw16/1//92:DVS it Mt1M•Ap.nr1 { •' I . 1 _, ,." �at .0." • �' t'- - ., __ . . , -: -7�._ - 7 M l IZICIMMil ,,> � r �•, ;ice ,--T�- •-r-w,... a ��`. .� _ ..:,.. r..�i.t mac :-�'�'�'�.w_Frc:� ?t�?`;aK'b; fA"FP . . p,ECIPROCAL EASEMENT AGREEMENT VITA COVENANTS. CONDITIONS .AND RESTRICTIONS 1 This Reciprocal Easement Agreement with Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions ("Agreement") is made this 30th day of June, 1992, between BCSA Realty Corp. , a Washington corporation ("HC") and Porsll-Orillia Associates, a Washington_._ general partnership ("Powell") . RECITALS: 1 A. EC Property. HC is the fee owner of Lots 2 and 3 as legally described on Exhibit I, to this Agreement ("HC Property") and as shown on the site plan attached hereto asExhibit Ba( e Plan") . Such Lots may be referred to in this Agreementseparately cW.) _as _"Lot 2" and !'Lot.3"... - i - B. Powell Property. Powell is the fee owner of Lots 1, 4, 1n \ 6 and 7 as legally described on Exhibit C to this Agreement 1 ("Powell Property") and as shown on the Site Plan attached hereto as Exhibit B. Such -lots may be referred to in this Agreement 5 separately as "Lot 1", "Lot 4", "Lot 6" and "Lot 7". The reference in this Agreement to any "lot" in the Shopping Center shall refer cr C'? to each of Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 and 7. a C) -'I-.JZ C. Shopping Center. The HC Property and the Powell Property v,u•! Cs/ shall be referred to collectively as the "Shopping Center" in this Jo r Agreement. •-;,, C.0 D. Owner. The term "Owner" as used herein shall mean and • 1`y:`- (s.? refer to each person or entity which holds fee title to any portion Q) of the Shopping Center And any successor of such person or entity 1 • l'- ›- acquiring said fee title from such person or entity. The term - ;,,, "Owner", unless otherwise provided in this Agreement, shall not "� include any lender, trust deed beneficiary or mortgagee, nor any .~ ' 5 lessee, tenant or occupant of space in the Shopping Center. E. purpose. HC and Powell desire that the HC Property and the Powell Property be developeu subject to the easewents and the covenants, conditions and restrictions set forth in this Agreement. 0 a AGREEMENT:• _ i In '- . In consideration that the following encumbrances shall be binding upon the parties hereto and shall attach to and run with the HC Property and the Powell Property, and shall be for the :'' benefit of and shall be limitations upon all future Owners of the `" HC Property and the Powell Property and that all easements herein set forth shall be appurtenant to the dominant estates, and in consideration of the promises, covenants, conditions, restrictions, 1 -1- 175</oos c o/17/V21 w51 A MCW•apr.nrl , I 1 • w V!J 1 IS easements and encumbrances contained herein, HC and Powell do hereby agree as follows: i TERNS ARTICLE 1 DEYINITION OS EXCLUSIVE BUILDING AREA AND COMMON AREA f 1.1 Pxclusive Building plea. "Exclusive Building Area" as used herein shall mean those portions of the HC Property and the Powell Property devoted from time to time to landg othero ements (including canopies, roof overhangs, supportsas the (includingcard extensions not exceeding twelve (12) feet in depth) , may change from time to time as provided in this Agreement. "Building Service Areas" as used herein shall mean truck docks, compactor pads, utilities pads, pallet storage areas and receiving cs . 1 _ -areas_and similar service areas and.facilities constructed solely S,- . for_the use -of the building located within the Exclusive Building z Area. i v, _ 1.2 Co222 ea• "Common Area" shall be all of the Shopping ,x Center except the Exclusive Building Area, Building Service Areas, and outdoor sales areas (as described and permitted in Section 4.7 ' of this Agreement) as the same may change from time to time as . provided in this Agreement. ;')'- C) 1.3 conversion to Common Area. Subject to the rights of Owners 1, portions of the Exclusive Building Area V,10 - under this Agreement, those�i Q and Building Service Areas on the HC Property and the Powell �-'`�' el, property which are not from time to time used or cannot under the ,d-, LJD terms of this Agreement be used for buildings shall become part of Q the Common Area for the uses be converted itvedteheBacke to Er. x luarea ~ C' converted to Common Area may 1,:• 0) Building Area by its development as Exclusive Building Area, if, at the time of conversion back to Exclusive Building Area, it does not violate any of the terms of this Agreement. ARTICLE 2 - 178E 2.1 irohibit�d u&Q.fl• The owners recognize their respective y ;' customers' need for adequate parking facilities in close proximity c to their premises and the importance of protecting such parking CI o facilities against unreasonableongtr undue b e encroachmpatrons or®nt which is employees of - • =1� likely to result from long parking Y p , certain types of business establishments. As a consequence- - thereof, the Owners covenant.and agree that no part of the Powell Property shall be devct,:,a to the use or operation of a mortuary, theater, carnival, bowling alley, skating rink, amusement r billiard enter, electronic or mechanical games arcade, pc ' , batting parlor, bingo parlor or health club, and no part of the / E Shopping Cantor shall be devoted to the use or operation of a —2— MNl•liar•rr i • 17S1/OOS,4/t7/02,D%A5 _ . 1 i cuprimpi pornographic shop, adult book store, nightclub, or dance hall, or a tavern, cocktail lounge or any facility for the on-premises consumption of alcoholic beverages except as an incidental part of the operation of a restaurant or other food-related establishment. Each owner agrees to maintain on its cwn property parking of five stalls for each 1,000 square feat of Floor Area on such Owner's property, or the number of parking spaces required by applicable law, whichever is greater. "Floor Area".. as used herein shall mean the total number of square feet of floor area in the building, except that Floor Area of outside sales areas and of mezzanines and basements not open to customers and incidental to ground floor retail operations shall not be counted. The Floor Area of any building shall be measured from the outside face of all exterior walls and the center line of party or common walls. During any period of rebuilding, repairing, replacement or reconstruction of W a building, the Floor Area of that building shall be deemed to be r- the same as existed immediately prior to that period. - • z 2.2 Further Restrictiong. Except for the HC Property, no build_±ng rof any size on Lot 1, and no building on Lots 4, 6 and 7 which has � less than twenty thousand (20,060) square feet of ?loor Area, or i any portion of a building which has been segregated for a 1= particular user and which contains less than twenty thousand l►- (20,000) square feet of Floor Area, shall be used for the purpose a of selling home improvement items, including without limitation 1-+ lumber, hardware items, decor, fashion electrics, fashion plumbing, �`1- C floor coverings, millwork, window coverings, plumbing suppe , )v, ;' V. electrical supplies, paint, wallpaper, ceiling fans, gardening supplies and patio furniture; provided that the e,`-' • Q restrictions in this Section 2.2 shall not apply to sales of such i-';" C items where such sales are incidental to other nonprohibited uses 1,,►- CG and the gross receipts to the user from such prohibited uses, individually or in the aggregate, do not exceed ten percent (10%) + ,• ' « of the total gross receipts for all sales by such user on an annual ,,,)I: CI basis. Each user's sales shall be calculated separately. !' Notwithstanding the foregoing, the restrictions in this Section 2.2 �. shall not apply to (a) the following users: Best; Smith's Hume Furnishings; Krause's; Office Club; Office Depot; PetSmart; Pacific e Linen; Circuit City; Future Shop; Magnolia Hi-Fit Pier 1, or (b) to a. CD any other user which sells a product mix substantially similar to _,/- the product mix sold by any of the foregoing listed entities as of 0, , the date oe this Agreement. e, i . 2.3 permitted UM. Subject to the terms of this Agreement, ►+ typical shopping center retail, office and service uses shall ire permitted, including without limitation fast food restaurants (with drive-through windows) and banks or other financial institutions (with drive-through lanes) . - , -3- Irsc/O 5:6/17/92 D 6 - WA-Apr.roi - , • i . 'r •; L• :,• .�7 , was viti .��' ri .:3 f :+: _ � .;k moo ARTICL3 3 - BUILDINGS 3.1 IAcation. Notwithstanding the general depiction on the Site I Plan attached as Exhibit a of building areas on some of the lots in the Shopping Center, no owner shall have any restrictions under this Agreement on where a building may be located on an Owner's property or where Common Area shall be, except for the following: e (a) Any building on Lot 7 may only be located within that portion of Lot 7 which is crosshatched and designated "Lot 7 Building Area" on the Site Plan attached as Exhibit E. (b) Any building ° must Lotsb4 and more 6 and twenty (20) feet from the north property lines of feet from the east property line of Lot 4. _ (c) Any building on Lots 4 or of the Powell Property 1- must be at least twenty (20) feet from the north property lines of �_ Lots 4 and 6 and twenty (20) Meet from the east•property line of 1= Lot 4. '- (d) The first buildings constructed for long-term use on each of Lots 2 and 3 must be located substantially to the west of ►_- the north-south drive aisle line designated as "Initial Building < Area" on the Site Plan attached as Exhibit B. HC and Powell agree W .4 1.-- N that after the first such buildings are so constructed, any , f71 c) replacement buildings or expansion of existing buildings may be , ':1 r. located anywhere on such Lots 2 and 3 so long as such buildings i `+ w otherwise comply with any restrictions set forth in this Agreement. �iJ i'�:.., CD (e) Any building on Lot 1 must be located on the J . CD northerly half of Lot 1. ;.," - CI (f) All improvements in the Shopping Center must comply - with applicable governmental requirements. (g) The curb cuts and access areasthe north paroperty draw on n lines of Lots 4 and 6 and the east property line ofLot on the Site Plan attached as Exhibit B cannot be relocated, diminished or impaired. j.c) (h) No change can be made to the access driveway along S o the north property line of Lot 2 or the access driveway between %,� Lots 4 and 6, all as drawn on the Site Plan attached as Exhibit D. • - (i) NC shall at al,l times provide reasonable access from the driveway marked as "Access Driveway" at the north of Lot 2 to the access driveway between Lots 4 and 6 also marked "Access "- Driveway" as shown on the Site Plan attached such as Eg hibnerat a and generally in a north-south direction, provided ' • -4- . %CNN•P9r.n.1 - IrSi/OOS,6/17/D?:DV51A _ 1 2111.,WOO south access may be reasonably located upon any portion of the HC Property. i 3.2 yire Protection. Any building constructed on the Shopping Center with a gross building area, including mezzanines and basements, of twenty thousand square feet (20,000) or more, must be constructed with an automatic sprinkler system for fire protection. _All other buildings in the Shopping Center mast be constructed, maintained and used in a manner which will preserve the sprinklered a insurance rate obtained on any building required to have an automatic sprinkler system. a 3.3 pamace or Destruction. In the event of any damage to or .� Center, the Owner of destruction of any building in the Shopping the parcel upon which such building is located, at its election, at its "sole cost and risk and with al: due diligence, shall either (i) u _ restore or replace such building, subject to the provisions of this Io _ Agreement,_ or (ii) raze and remove all parts of said -damaged or- - - : destroyed building then remaining and-- the... debris resulting • _ • -therefrom and otherwise clean and restore the Exclusive Building 11-_ Area affected by such casualty to a level and clean condition; = provided that all parking and access on such parcel shall be 3 restored to its pre-casualty condition. ce ARTICLE 4 - CO)O(OH AREA USE v i 4.1 grant of Easements. Each Owner, as grantor, hereby grants 'tg'�' CD solely to the other Owners only for the benefit of said other J J N Owners and their respective tenants, and such Owners' and tenants' ,V CDcustomers, invitees and employees, a nonexclusive easement for i 1_... Ct roadways, walkways, ingress and egress, access, the parking of ),yt- (AD motor vehicles and use of facilities installed for the comfort and i O convenience of customers, invitees and employees on the Common Area ,, Cd of the HC Property and the Powell Property, as more particularly 1,n1= Cr) located and described on the attached Site Flan, of s the sat me noe t '" _, change from time to time. The foregoing gr s effective as to any lot which is part of the Shopping Center until 1...' construction is commenced on such lot. 4.2 Use. Subject to existing easements of record and the terms of o this Agreement, the Common Area shall be used for roadways, ",, walkways, ingress and egress, access, parking of motor vehicles, n loading and unloading of commercial and other delivery vehicles, _,n for driveway purposes, and for the comfort and convenience cf `- customers, invitees and employees of all businesses ane occupants ` - of the buildings constructed on the Exclusive Building Area. No long-term parking, park-and-ride, or storage of motor vehicle., is j permitted. - I ~ . 1 -5- NC1u,.Mr.n.1 1n<i00s,ainiv21D 6 . SEMI 4.3 Access. (a) po Barriers. No walls, fences, or barriers of any kind shallrt be constructedr or maintainedwhich shall preventr impair the use portion thereof, by any party or the free or exercise of any of the easements grantsd herein, orth and access and movement, including without limitation,t2 pedestrian Property; n; vehicular traffic between the HC Property Powell necessary provided, however, reasonable traffic controls, as may installed to guide and control the orderly flow of traffic, may be so long as access driveways to the parking areas in the Common Area are not closed or blockangel to the•Exclusivy e exception 9 Area provision and Common ! eal er (i) for Chang ' Area permitted by this Agreement, and (ii) for incidental encroach- menta ,by an Owner upon the CommoniArn eam of y �nur an Ownaer'srprope rty of,the or , Wa as provided in this Agreement, storefront barricades and similar - use the ladderscaffol poa obstruction of the Common Area, ii-; _ facilities resulting in temporary b z all of which are permitted hereunder so long as their use is kept Le, within reasonable requirements of - constructionor work s provided _ expeditiously pursued byan owner on its property, j in this Agreement. t Powell agrees that HC may (b) &taaina for Construction. Z eltemporarily use Lot 1 for HC's staging during the initial t, p construction of the building on Lot 2. HC agrees that Powell may J P. temporarily use that portion ofw Lot 3 to the east" oftohte Site as ,,, :.: t'l crosshatched and designated as Pol initiaStagil construction of the `^-' on CD Plan attached as exhibit $ during the JiJ r1 building on Lot 4 and the building on Lot 6. HC may to relocate the staging area for Lots or 6 of as suche Powell sing areaerty is of substantially . CDalternate location ao long • _ the same size and is not significantly more inconvenient lt�oyPowell "° than where the staging area was previously i,,,` using a staging area (i) shall not obstruct any access lanes on the +'''.-' Common Area; (ii) shall keep the staging area in a neat and clean i condition during its use; (iii) shall leave the staging area in a I.." neat and clean condition at the end of its use; (iv) shall use the .,. staging area only for the minimum amount of time necessary for constructions and (v) shall quit claim to the other narty the ;� benefitted. party's rights under this section for wh ) when the ich staging o w construction is completed on the propertyor CI 0 area is provided. - _ m,,, 4.4 imitations on Use. (a) Comets. Customers and invitees shall not bet permitted tted to park on the Common Area except while shopping business in the Shopping Center. r f -6- MCW•Ay,..v� - 1»t ions,6/17/97:OM& II . . 1SS® • (b) Emnloveea. Employees shall not be permitted to park on t*.a Common Area, except in the Common Area on an Own=kin property rty where the Owner has designated shs "dasignat and g approveT • Owners from time o time may mutually ey do not, each may "employee parking areas", however," if fpl yes parking areas"Owner itsy formally or informally designs own parcel for use by such Owner's emp loge s or the g,empl mees of such Owner's tenants. Notwithstanding he fo woyee a` j parking for the HC Property shall be permitted in the area represents generally the row of parking immediately adjacent to the 1 north property lines of Lots 4 and 6 or in the area which repre- sents generally the first four spaces of the six line of s Lot of parking immediately adjacent to the east property crosshatched and designated as "No HC Employee Parking" on the Site IPlan attached as Exhibit U. W (c) general. All of the uses permitted within the Common I'll" Area shall be used with-reason and judgment so as not to interfere . with the primary purpose of the Common.Area which•is to.provide for 12 , parking for the customers, invitees and employees of those businesses conducted within the Exclusive Building Area and for the • ►- servicing and supplying of such businesses. Public telophones are ipermitted within the Common Area. '-- (d) No Use gee. Persons using the Common Area in accordance E with this Agreement shall not be charged any fee for such use CAI without the written consent of the Owners unless such fee shall be "W d ordered by a governmental authority. If a governmental authority imposes a surcharge or regulatory fee on customer or employee jparkingspaces within the ;� parking or based on the number of i,,, Shopping Center or any other similar fee or charge, then the Owners {'-'" cl by mutual agreement shall use theirbest for tehfe Shoppingforta to i statute a " r. 0 uniform fee collection parkingsystem 1" I CsJ 4.5 Utility dnd Service Easementa. The Owners shall cooperate in ,' ` appropriate and proper easements for the , the granting of installation, repair and replacement of storm drains, sewers, utilities and other proper services in the locations generally as r 4, .., set forth in the plans attached_ hereto as Exhibit D necessary for the orderly development and operation of the Common Area and 1 ,• o buildings to be erected upon the Exclusive Building Area. The „'' owners will use their best efforts to cause the installation ns t alls Common of 0 the o such utility and service lines prior to any paving ,•, Area. Any Owner may relocate, at such Owner's sole cost and x "' expense, such utility and service lines so long as there the in rinimal - • Shopping interruption in service to any other prop y Center and there is the same or better utility service to the other ,; property in the Shopping Center after the relocation. • d �4.6 aII• Except for directional signs for guidance upon the Common Area, no signs shall be located signs advert the ieing n Area on the ebHC 1 Property or the Powell Property excepti 4 II A oc5:6/il/a2:e41A • e . 11 conducted thereon. No signs shall obstruct the access, ingress and egress points shown on the Site Plan, as the same may be changed from time to time only in accordance with the terms of this i Agreement. All signs shall comply with any governmental regula- tions. Any pylon sign on the Shopping Center must be of a quality comparable to pylon signs typically used by national retail tenants. One sign may be located on each of Lots 2 and 3 in the i locations designated on the attached Site Plan, as the sign , locations may be changed from tims to time by the Owner of the lot upon which such sign is located. The Owner of the HC Property 1 shall be responsible for the cost and maintenance of any sign on the HC Property. L4 Lots 1, 4 and 6 may each have a sign in the locations • ,.�,. _, designated_ on the Site Plan attached as gxjiibit El, as the sign z • - locations may be changed from time to time -by the Owner-of the lot _ f- -- upon which such sign is located, and the-Owner of the property upon - v' which the sign is located shall be responsible for the cost and .• f=.• maintenance of such sign. 2 One sign may be located on Lot 7 in the location designated on the attached Site Plan, which sign shall be constructed by HC. m Such sign shall be divided into three equal blocks, one on top of W • the other. Powell agrees that HC may designate the users for the ;1i top two blocks of the sign (which users must have businesses fv,�'•' conducted on Lots 2 or 3). Powell may designate the user for the !n bottom block of the sign, which user must be a business conducted J on Lot 7. HC shall pay two-thirds of the construction cost and i--",! C maintenance for such sign on Lot 7. Powell shall pay one-third of 1-!- N the construction cost and maintenance of such sign. A party's C3 share of the construction cost for the sign shall not be due. and !:.•s 0 such party's obligation to pay maintenance costs for the sign shall 1""... t') not commence until that party actually user the allocated space on ' 0 the sign. . . 0 .• •, , N Except for HC's use of the sign on Lot 7 as described in this CD •.- Section 4.6, no Owner of any of the lots in the Shopping Center shall have the right to use any sign on any other lot in the o Shopping Center, except with the consent of the Owner of such other g= lot, which constnt may be withheld in such Owner's sole discretion. 0 . x.m 4.7 Outside Merchandising. Except as provided in this Agreement, _ the selling, displaying or merchandising of goods shall not be _ conducted upon the Common Area. Each Owner or Owner's tenants may use the sidewalk immediately adjacent to the Exclusive Building Area on such Owner's property to the extent allowed by law for the 7 placement of shopping carts and for the display of merchandise being sold from the building on such property and for the sale of y food and nonalcoholic beverages from outdoor vending carts, -8- . 17i4/OOS,K17/91,OVS16 1KW•11er.ret I v._.�.; - . . • - -, I-n - - UMW • viommis ' '-..';, be provided the pedestrian use e sofch the e sidewalk shall not the ^�: unreasonably impeded by Y Notwithstanding t�'; applicable law, any - :- foregoing and so long as not prohibited by pP .• 1 Owner shall have the right to conduct occasional sales or may sell ,.,• Christmas trees within the Common Area located upon such Owner's ; parcel, provided that such activities shall not be conducted1d bywitany in fifty (50) feet of the property line of any property ,Lt- { Owner without the consent of such Owner, which consent may be withheld in such Owner's sole discretion, and such activities shall Vic* ingress and egress and traffic flow/drive r4:. not interfere with the change Iron time to time. '%�' areas of the Common Area as the same may `.. ARTICLE 5 - CO)O(O$ AREA DEPELOPI[SNT 5. Development Timing. When any building is constructed on 3 1 parcel, the Common Area on that parcel shall be developed at the u expense of.the_O ner of said parcel. _ z - - COMMON AREa XAINTENANCE z ' .. ARTICLE i '.' Following completion of the Common ;, = Area6.1 jai rovement StandaZ53d- p that Owner, at its sole °• ►- improvements on an Owners rope y, cost and expense, shall maintain the Common Area on its parcel in Ig ,-. first class ondition and repair and in without limiting the generality pof the fo egoing, liance with all . �oc )))J laws. applicable the maintenance shall include the following: in." U W 0 �, (i) Kaintaini�sg and repairing the surfaces in a level, smooth } • iJ u r. and evenly covered condition with installed e type of surfacingor �� G material and striping originally } such • 1-• cl substitute therefor as shall in all respects be equal in iw = C.p quality, use and durability; ►! 1 CD papers, debris, filth and refuse and washing • �;;:•� � (ii) Removing all pap , I•n r— 01 or thoroughly sweeping the area to the extent reasonably , �- •-• necessary to keep the area in a neat, clean and orderly �, condition, and free of snow and ice; "' (iii) Pla • cing, keeping in-repair and replacing any necessary - appropriate directional signs, markers and lines; t keeping in repair and replacing when 0 (iv) necessany, p 9 necessary, such artificial lighting facilities as shall be reasonably required;• - t •; _ (v) Maintaining any perimeter walls in a good condition and • state of repair; and (vi) Maintaining all landscaped areas and making such replacement of shrubs and other landscaping as is necessary. , i. -9- �a-.r.i i ,�.ioos,eit7ivt:o,is1e • , . }}I 6.2 aintenance by Agent. Subject to the revocable mutual It as an agent • agreement of the Owners, a third party may be appointed9 , of the Owners to maintain the Common Area sinthe else per sucn agency er as outlined , 1 in Section 6.1. Said third party may which fee is mutually acceptable to the Owners to cover supervision, management, accounting and similar services and which fee is to be allocated auong the Owners based on their mutual • -1%. -• , agreement. _ i ARTICLE 7 - INDEXQQrICATIO2(, INSURANCE 7.1 Owner's Indemnification. Each Owner ("Indemnifying Owner") i ,i hereby agreas to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the other Owners and other Owner's tenants from and against all demands, , I claims, causes of action or judgments, and all expenses and reasonable attorneys' fees incurred in investigating or resisting `'', _ the -came, for. bodily injury to.person, loss of life or damage to o _ • - property- (i).. occurring_,on the Indemnifying Ownerrs parcel,_ except z to the extent caused by the negligence or villfill 'act or omission v, • in whole or in part of any other Owner or the tenants of such other . = owner or the employees, contractors or agents of such other Owner ,'- or tenants, or (ii) occurring on another Owner's parcel if caused 1= by the negligence, willful act or omission of the Indemnifying i~ Owner or the tenants of the Indemnifying Owner or the employees, oc contractors or agents of such Indemnifying Owner or tenants. To W . the extent the Indemnifying Owner is liable with another person or entity for any demand, claim, cause of action rjudgment, he �`.., foregoing indemnity shall only apply tl portion thereof. I�� C jt:•., V, 7.2 Insurance. Each Owner shall obtain and maintain comprehensive i;., . fi2 general liability insurance during the term of this Agreement. The C limits of liability of such insurance bhall be nut less than Two +:;: •' y Million Dollars ($2,000,000.00) combined single limit coverage for ':.,,,'-- W injury to person, loss of life and damage to property arising out "'_; of any single occurrence. The dollar limit set forth above shall be increased on the commencement of the sixth (6th) year after the date of this Agreement and at five (5) year intervals thereafter by • agreement of the Owners who shall mutually agree by using reasonable limits wih eference 0to the limits of � . insuranceltor similar shopping centersrin King County, Washington. o ., HC may sell insure for its obligations under this Section 7.2 CD o provided that it maintains a net worth of at least $75,000,000 at _.' all times during such self-insurance and provides any other Owner -- • with satisfactory evidence of such net worth within ten (10) • . calendar dayc of such- Owner's written request therefor. Upon request, each Owner shall provide the other Owners with a copy of _ W a certificate of insurance evidencing such insurance. All Owners :: shall name each other as additional insureds on their respective policies (including during any period of construction) and shall obtain contractual liability insurance for their ljidemnification - • 10- gut•M..�.t 1�,a;oos,sit7io2,ovwta 1 MS COMARAMMI obligations under this Agreement. No policies may be canceled without thirty (�0) days notice to the other Owne subject to any ale insurance lesser period of time or other agreement by app • t companies. r, ARTICLE 8 - REALTY TAXES AND ASSESSMENTS - eal Estate Taxes and nasesament�• It is intended that all real $ assessments relating to any portion of the real estate taxes and Shopping Center or improvements thereon, or : ownership thereof, eOwners shall be paid prior to delinquency by thereof, including without limitation those taxes and assessments which are laviod against that part of the Common Area owned by each Owner. • Owner tails at any time to pay before delinquency • .It the event any •of its parcel or parcels, and taxesh or assessments lienonn portion the Common Area, then except - •• and a the may become a on ant... contested by judicial' or while the validity thereof is Leinq such taxes v1 administrative proceedings, any other Owner may pay cost, and _ and/or assessments together with interest, pia scoh taxes '`- in any such event the defaulting Owner obligated to pay for 'i and/or assessments shall promptly reimburse�sp naotier,er Ownercfor �- alld such taxes and/or untilssuchsreimbur8ement has been made the cc and other chargeson the defaulting W .:1 '`" C amount t5ereof shall constitute a lien and chargeto anybona fide1:-"- owner's parcel, subject and subordinate, however, or deed of trust made in good faith and for value then `'' (� mortgagethe assessing jN j , ;�, O outstanding against said parcel. If allowed by `; 52 agency, assessments may be paid in installments for the longest :.., td period •permitted so long as no delinquency occurs. - �'"- f4 AIITTCY•1I f - R1[INENT DOMAIN ® ! , .' C.;) herein shall be construed to ,,,= 9.1 Z ear's R{aht to "ard. Nothin a ants made to give any owner any interest in anyaward or payments another owner in connection with any exercise of eminent domain or transfer in lieu thereof affecting said other Owner's parcel or construed to give the public or any gcvernment any rights in the Shopping inntie. In of any part of exercise the Common Area, the in or award a transferb lieu t o? attributable to the la d and yovements of such to the Owner in teer thereof and �_ o Common Area shall be payableonly _ no claims thereon shall be made by the owners of any other portion ! of the Common Area. 9.2 ms Sra Cla • All other. O ners of the Common Area may file collateral claims with the _condemning authority for their losses which are separate and bpart from the value of the land area and improvements taken from another owner. . 1 -11- • MC1aA•A�r.rr1 _ • 1754/(45:6/17/92:06 1a . . 1 I 1 • . 9.3 f Cpgon Areas. The Owner of the fee of each portion of the Common Ara so con demnedommon shall pro o m owne repa d by it and restore the remaining portion I nearly as practicable to the condition of the same immediately prior to such condemnation oc transfer without contribution from any other Owner. 1 ARTICLE 10 - CANCELLATION, )[ODIYICATION, DURATION rr.,r-ei late on or ica�i4s• This Agreement may be cancelled orr modified only by o .1 the written agreement of all Owners of the Shoppir.g Center, which cancellation or modification agreement shall be recorded in the office of the Center r is located. ty No ownerer of shalltunrea unreasonably I whiche county in h the Shopping modification to this withhold or delay its consent to a proposed for Agreement. Without specifying other reasonable grounds f _ withholding consent, an Owner may withhold consent based on { z material adverse financial impacts to an Owners parcel in the , Shopping ping Center as a result of the requested modification. , Le, Unless otherwise cancelled and terminated as 1 e.2 $i>:3ition• permitted herein, this Agreement shall continue for sixty (60) i= years from the date of this Agreement and shall be renewed for ss all an •- unlimited number of successive terms of ten (10) years, Owners agree otherwise; however, al the easements granted in this Ic4W Agreement shall continue in perpetuity. J~ �',� - RELEASE YROX LIABILITY v, ARTICLE 11 •�� CD �' An rson or entity acquiring fee or J J 1 nn RP , ['') 11.1 RP from Liabili�Y• y � in Center shall be CD leasehold title to any portion of the Shopping t 0 bound by this Agreement only as to the parcel or portion thereof ?J~ N acquired by such person or entity. Such person or entity shall be • ,•;. " wi bound by this Agreement only during the period such person or entity is the fee or leasehold owner of etch parcel or portion thereof, except as to obligations, liabilities or responsibilities that accrue or are based on events which occur during said period. Although persons or entitles may be released under this section, t -' the shall continue to s, covenants be benefits a annd restrictions upon the Shopping s Agreement Center - � running with the land. n ARTICLE 12 - DtYADLT - Loc.' - ,� - `- 12.1 Default. In the avant of default or threatened default under te proceedings Agreement, e Owners b entitlede for full and adequate relief from the c nsequencesuof said default. ' 12.2 Romedies for Deiolilt• If the Owner of any parcel , during the term of this Agreement defaults in the full, faithful and punctual -1 2- Mcw•wr.rot t ncroos,ertrr�t�nvfte . K f i pe of anyobligation required hereunder and if upon the 1 expirationxpirtoc (30) days after written notice from any other Owner no thirtyth particularity the nature and extent of such Owner stating with default, the defaulting Owner has failed to cure such default, and if a diligent effort is not then being made to cure such default, then any other Owner ("Performing Owner"), in addition to all other remedies it may have at law or in equity, shall have the right to ( perform such obligation of this Agreement on behalf..- of such defaulting Owner and to be reimbursed by such defaulting Owner ` within ten (10) business days of demand therefor for the cost ` thereof with interest at eighteen percent (18%) per annum on the maximum rate allowed by law. Any such claim for reimbursement, I i together with interest as aforesaid, shall be a secured right and a lien shall attach and take effect upon recordation of a proper claim gf lien by the claimant in the office of the County Recorder +W of the county in which the Shopping Center is located. The claim - of lien shall include the following: (i)�the name of the claimant; o (ii) a statement. concerning the basis of the claim of the lien; z (iii) the last known name and address of the Owner or`reputed Owner -v+ • of the parcel against which the lien is claimed; (iv) a description_ = of the property against which the lien is claimed; (v) a = description of the work performed or payment made which has given = rise to the claim of lien hereunder and a statement itemizing the amount thereof; and (vi) a statement that the lien is claimed oe pursuant to the provision•of the Agreement reciting the date, book W • CD and page of the recordation hereof. The claim of lien shall be , ''W CD dely verified, acknowledged and contain a certificate that a copy ::i ., thereof has been served upon the Owner against whoa the lien is claimed, either by personal service or by mailing to the defaulting -' el Owner as provided in Article 13. The lien so claimed shall attach 1 from the date ofrecordationrbsuit, or y in the underpower of sale (which power � ount claimed thereby .0�- O and it may be enforced by other manner •° j (v lot hereby granted) , judicial foreclosure or in any C') alloyed by law for the foreclosure of liens. A Performing Owner is • _ ,n '- hereby granted the right to enter upon the parcel of the defaulting ,-' Owner for the limited purpose of curing a default as provided under • this Agreement. Any exercise of the power of sale or foreclosure • shall be conducted in accordance with the law=e c!the State te or I,. Washington applicable to the exercise of p'' ro riate foreclosures of mortgages and eeds of fht ttrust. iftappropriate,o a Performing Owner is hereby appointed f with lull right of substitution. §t exercising such power of sale, o Notwithstanding the foregoing, such liens shall be subordinate to z,n any mortgage or deed of trust given in good faith ai to dt fore valueen, now ' or hereafter encumbering the property j ich mortgage or deed of trust was recorded prior to the recording of the lien, and any purchaser at any foreclosure or trustee's sale (as ) n as any grantee b deedrnde d of trust shall take free and trustee's sale) under any first mortgage clear from any such then existing lien, but otherwise subject to MC1M•Ayr.n°1 17SG/an aw W92 01.61L • ems. 6 • the provisions of this Agreement. The failure of the Owner or ' Owners of any of the parcels subject to this Agreement to insist in any one or more cases upon the strict performance of any of the promises, covenants, conditions, restrictions or agreements herein, shall not be construed as a waiver or relinquishment for the future breach of the provisions hereof. - 12.3 Attorneys' Fees. In the event that suit is brought for the enforcement of this Agreement or as a result of any alleged default hereunder, the prevailing party or parties to such suit shall be entitled to be paid reasonable attorneys' fees and costs by the non-prevailing party or parties, including those on appeal and any judgment or decree rendered shall include an award therefor. 12.4 Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed and enforced L., by, and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of 4' - - Washington. _ - . ARTICLE 13 - E+OTICEE - 'n ►-. 13.1 Koticea. Notices made by the Owners pursuant hereto may be 5 served personally or via overnight courier or may be served by depositing the nano in the United States mail, postage prepaid, certified mail, return-receipt requested, addressed as follows: Z If to Powell: Powell-Orillia Associates ",_, 737 Market Street r, 3 C Kirkland, WA 98033 '•'CO .. J L CV Attn: Peter W. Powell CDCV r, With a copy to: Robert C. MacAulay ;.'- CO Alston, Courtnage, MacAulay & Proctor 17"; 0 1000 Second Ave., Ste. 3900 t cn Seattle, WA 98104 I,...: If to HC: c/o Waban Inc. { .. ,' 140 Orai.gefair Mall, Suite 100 " ' • Fullerton, CA 92632 1 ' Attn: Vice President, Real Estate s o ;`. With a copy to: c/o Waban Inc. g`�' One Mercer Road ,� L. Natick, KA 01760 ?'^_ Attn: Executive Vice rresident, Finance -_ i " Notice shall be deemed given when served personally upon or delivered by overnight courier to a person of suitable age and discretion, or if mailed, three (1) days after deposited in the c U.B. mail. I -14- - 1T54/OO5 a/17/?IiM/l6 kVA•AOr.n.) i . MN The foregoing addresses may be changed by written notice given pursuant to the provisions of this Section. ARTICLE 14 - LENDER PROTECTION 14.1 Lender Protection. This Agreement and the rights, privileges, covenants, agreements and easements hereunder with respect to each Owner and all parcels, shall be superior and senior to any lien _ placed upon any parcel, including the lien of any mortgage or deed of trust. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no broach hereof shall defeat, render invalid, diminish or impair the lien of any mortgage or deed of trust made in good faith and for value, but all of the covenants and restrictions, easements and conditions and other provisions, terms and conditions contained in this Agreement shall Ibe binding upon and effective against any person or entity ! -(including any mortgagee or beneficiary under a deed of trust) who acquires title to any parcel or any portion thereof by foreclosure, r - _trustee's sale,,..deed in lieu of foreclosure or otherwise. - - - f ;� - ARTICLE 15 - GENERAL PROVISIONS . - 1 15.1 No Covenant to Operate. Notting either expressed or implied, • 1 a contained in this Agreement shall obligate any Owner or any Owner's • ''-- tenants to continuously operate any type of business on its parcel. • I W • N 15.2 Sunning of BesefitS and Servitudes. Rights of Successors. The 1" CD easements, restrictions, benefits, and obligations hereunder shall v i ;: i~ create mutual benefits and burdens upon all the parcels of the "" N Shopping Center running with the land. This Agreement shall bind '`I O and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto, their respective "" C7 heirs, personal representatives, tenants, successors, and/or 1,,,f- 00 assigns. The singular number includes the plural and any gender •::., includes all other genders. '.)'= 03 15.3 Net a Public Dedication. Nothing herein contained shall be " deemed to be a gift or dedication of any portion of the Common Area to the general public or for the general public or for any public purposes whatsoever, it being the intention of the parties hereto that this Agreement shall be strictly limited to and for the purposes herein expressed. The right of the public or any person o to make any use whatsoever of the Common Area or the parcels herein • �,,: affected, or any portion thereof (other than any use expressly • "o allowed by a written or recorded map, agreement, deed or _ • _., dedication) is by permission, and subject to the control .lf the Owners. Notwithstanding any other provisions herein to the 1 - • = contrary, the Owners by mutual agreement may periodically restrict f ingress and egress from the Common Area in order to prevent a .1 prescriptive easement from arising by reason of continued public use. Any restriction on ingress and egress shall be limited to the minimum period nec'ssary to prevent the creation of a prescriptive ` ` -15- 1 e. • 1756/0016/17/92 i D016 KVA-Aer.na l I . • t 1 _ / — , . .. • •-r4 ►._ /' "4.. s • --.�.. ' •V:r.> "� ._ - n rr-V I_i 1 '- - NMI _ i • easement and shall occur at such a time as to have a minimum effect on the operation of the Shopping Center. 15.4 Document Execution and Change. It is understood and agreed 1 that, until this document is fully executed and delivered by the authorized corporate officers of the parties hereto, there is not and shall not be an agreement of any kind between the parties hereto upon which any commitment, undertaking once this document obligation i can lbe I founded. It is further agreed that, executed and delivered, it contains 'he ent{re agreement between I the parties hereto and that, in exec.ltino it, the parties do not rely upon any statement, promise or representation not herein expressed and, except as permitted by Section 10.1 of this r Agreement, this document, once executed and delivered, shall not be modified, changed or altered in any respect except by a written document executed and delivered in the same manner as required for u., this document. • - L.. . _ �_.. ... 15.5 No-Joint Venture. It- is not intended- by this Agreement to, i and nothing contained in this Agreement shall, create any f= partnership, joint venture or other joint or equity type agreement • I,- '>etween the Owners. 15 15.6 Reasonableness of Consent. Unless otherwise provided herein, I'- whenever an Owner's agreement or approval is required under this 1z Agreement, such Owner shall not unreasonably withhold or delay such 1....,,_ C) agreement or approval. .,s .,� ,,;; 15.7 Lot 1. Powell intends to develop Lots 1 and' 7 in the future, I';� N although there are no current plans for such development. Other ,�,�' G than the terms of this Agreement, no Owner may place any {"';' restrictions on the development of Lot 7. Powell agrees to not J';"- t0 commence the processing of any governmental entitlements for • ; ' CD construction on Lot 1 until the earlier of (a) that date upon which ,; ;. ,. N HC has commenced construction of improvements on Lots 2 and 3; or 07 (b) that date which is two (2) years from the date of this -' Agreement. Prior to any development of Lot 1, Powell will he required to obtain applicable governmental approvals. Powell's development of Lot 1 shall be subject to site plan approval by the Owner of Lot 2, which approval will not be unreasonably withheld or ..o delayed. In connection with any development on Lot 1, Powell agrees to not disrupt the traffic flow on Lot 2, not diminish any utility services provided to Lot 2 and not provide any off-site amenities to obtain approval for development :n Lot 1. -HC agrees __' . that in connection with any development on Lot 1, Powell may make ! cur', cuts directly opposite and to match the curb cuts on Lot 2 which are directly opposite' the south border of Lot 1, as _. designated on the attached Site Plan _and as the same may change ' from time to time, all such work at Powell's sole cost and expense. a 15.8 Counterparts. This Agreement may be signed in any number of counterparts, all of which together shall constitute one document. 4 ' - -16- . ' I714/005:A/17/97:05151A MC4-Asr.rel I i ti . - . - , . .,. . .1,..,,,, ,.,.,,,,.;!....::,7.....•....`,.'. ',•.r,:1:..•-• ..' -. •. • '.•.. . I • IWy -;--i :i0;314i.,-"4":,,...?..- 4ak-Iek*Al.'•f';e's44r.A-AZ?::ii.eit.t.A.:••••:-.f;-::'.-!"....e,ea;eee-t'elt.7.:z•:•".“' •et-fe'cr.teee---•-.k —... .:: ;a, ir Only the original counterpart signature and notary pages need be recorded with one copy of this Agreement. v 15.9 No Consents. Except as provided in this Agreement, Ir coverer, bythis Agreement is not development on any property ' subject to any consent from or to HC or Powell. All development will be subject to satisfaction of applicable lot coverage, i density, parking and other zoning and land use requirements of any governmental authority with jurisdiction. 15.10 Wet:ends. As part of the governmental approval for develop- ment of the HC Property, the Owner of Lot 7 must provide and agrees to provide to the City of Renton one or more easements for wetlands preservation of approximately 65 feet in width, or such greater area as required by the City of Renton for the development of the HC Property as such development is currently approved by the City ,, of Renton. Powell understands that the legal description for the • '. wet'ands preservation easement is as currently set forth in - attached -Exhibit F. Such easement will be recorded separately. _ All costs associated • with the maintenance of the wetlands ?. ^ '' preservation area on Lot 7, except real property taxes, shall be paid by Lots -2 and 3. The wetlands easement area shall be maintained to a standard designated by SC. '' 15.11 Lot 7. Powell, as Owner of Lot 7, hereby conveys and quitclaims to the other Owners in the Shopping Center for the JF- benefit of the Shopping Center a perpetual, non-exclusive easement ',_, CN2 for ingress and egress, and access over and across that portion of • 6 O Lot 7 legally described in attached exhibit E ("Driveway Easement J C.. Property") . The costs to maintain the Driveway Easement Property „C) CD shall be shared prorate by all the property in the Shopping Center, ".' 0 provided that no lot is obligated to contribute to maintenance '4 N costs for the Driveway Easement Area until construction commences "- IC) on such lot, and then only for such lot's prorate share of mainte- rnance costs thereafter. The prorate share shall be the percentage �;� which the square footage of a lot upon which construction has - -. commenced bears to the total square footage of all lots in the .- ,' Shopping Center upon which construction has commenced, except Lot 7, which square footage shall be deemed to be 30,000, and ,- Lot 1, for which the lot square footage shall be determined based • S on the buildable area of the lot, excluding property dedicated wetlands preservation and similar to the method used by Powell to o determine the build�+ble arer. for Lot 7. The s following hie Section 4 lootages for lot size shall be used for pureo _ "' 15.10: Lot Square - . . _ Lot Footage W Lot 2 445,313 Lot 3 586,312 . Lot 4 35,000 - Lot 6 35,000 Lot 7 30,000 -17- MOM•Air..1 _t /04SrA/17/92rpVf16 - - • r .. { .:• + _,c. , r. .'(.Jyf..afi..„ a=Y . rt �.??TT�F �AH•wM r • 44 .. '•t '" - .51_'Y r us rt • ' i t'P+w.; yQ'�3 '$)__AI..F'.• •:14 s! �...•42... f•.Ya tJrs*...-S jT t „"-.ai,..AVi4,..4 r~ L'i:/4'!1 mot. f..N:,l:N;, ,,.if• �r Il%s 1 HC shall maintain the DriNsway Easement Area to a standard as designated by HC in its reasonable discretion. If an Owner obligated to pay a prorate share of such maintenance costs fails to do so within ton (10) business days of written demand therefor accompanied by substantiating invoices, then interest on the unpaid `• amount shall bear interest at eighteen percent (18%) per annua until paid and the other Owners shall have the rights and remedies • provided in Section 12 of this Agreement. • IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this 1 Agreement. pOWEL7rORILLIA ASSOCIATES, a HCWA REALTY CORP., a Washington Washi,• on ene •1 partnership corporation I, By o • . Powell • s r G Partner - - - Its I By `� �_ A . .... Peter W. Powell Its ..' General Partner EXBIBITB I ei A - Legal Description of HC Property �' •+ CD B - Site Plan W f C - Legal Description of Powell Property ' N D - Utility Plan d' E - Driveway Easement Area „1 F - Wetlands Preservation Easement Area -L , i G — IL r t— Y C ��1 J l - • C. in • • —18- ' InVOQ31u17/92tDVS1• KVA•M,.not .. ITS.•i i •�: - •' ^f lY 4'{r•.. F��a•a1_.A,;.ti-.a•..'4• �. 4 - • • • t i STATE OP WASHINGTON ) \ • ) ss. COUNTY OP &.1_ ) On this 2•7rit day of 640te- , 1992, before me, a Notary . i . .;`` ., Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared Lloyd W. Powell and Peter W. Powell, to K. partners of POWELL-ORILLIA ASSOCIATES, me known to bra the general • '' the partnership named in and which executed the foregoing instrumned the same - ent/ and thsy a �act and deed od to mef said partnershipt si for the . as the free and °therein mentioned.uses and purposes I certify that I know or haVe satisfactory evidence that the persons appearing before me and making acknowledgment are theJ on this document. ' persons.whose true signatures appear _ . • a -WZTNES$. my hand and' official•veal the day and-year in this certificate above written. . •' . y ' ���OiHy, NOTARY PUBLIC in and for e S e of .�`�.•` �yl '+.,� Washington, residing at"Nik % • 40ft0' T 'I, My commission expires: /St-/ _ J ` y ta••10 \.c;Ca N • • _7 • 0 , a -19- rpM-A®r.n.1 • 1/.54 XSt6/1I/9lrOV51A . . • t f, sast7106 • • BC shall maintain the Driveway Easement Area to a standard as designated by BC in its reasonable discretion. If an Owner obligated to pay a prorate share of such maintenance costs fails to do so within ten (10) business days of written demand therefor accompanied by substantiating invoices, then interest on the unpaid asount shall bear interest at eighteen percent (16%) per annum until paid and the other Owners shall have the rights and remedies provided in Section 12 of this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this i 1 Agreement. POWELL-ORILLIA ASSOCIATES, a HCWA CO . , a Washington ::inr: generalpartnership co Powell _. I Prestcic. ni' _ r,•. _ _. - General-Partner o -- = Peter W. Powell ... ..•••r. �- General Partner Its s ZIBIBIT$ W • A - Legal Description of HC Property - ►-U B - Site Plan W N t C - Legal Description of Powell Property O D - Utility Plan -J„D U E - Driveway Easement Area � , F - Wetlands Preservation Easement Area i` 0 • t.: i,▪... ,.. O i ,' v W S •^ - _ r- •i ,� W ,J r , , , -16- IC • 1756/0010417/92: 16 • • g¢F • i. - -- ' ' ; ' "' 'v..' •.'`1.1-.'.......•''7-4"'Ow:,7:. ,."....v?, -....0-,',....4•7.1,0e.: KK y 1 M •,- y`� IL , .!;" • k ram c. . 4_t.Y' �.1 e t �,?�x(y. ,� ' • SWIM , - C;a/i-ornt i c_ . STATE OF WASHINOTOti ) • ) ss. COIINTY OF OYe-1 n�( ) On this r� day of �tir*e , 1992, before me, a Notary i Public in and for th:i, State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared Jahn F. t...tvY a:xi to me known to be the Pyrs i Ci and . of ECWA REALTY CORP., the corporation named in and whichexecuted the foregoing instrument; and they acknowledged to me that they signed the same as the free and we therein meat act and of said corporation for the uses and purposes I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that the persons appearing beforn a making on this documenis tIDent are the persons whose true signaturesappear _ - o = WITNESS my _hand and ..official seal the day .and- year in this certificate above written i= 0� i� - — _ NOT PUBLIC in and for the State o! . residing at "',0-Pz' .C cMy commission expires: 9-i°1:S W • J►— J J N 1 141,46-.1II Mowry PI —C 1 v' • 0 ; }r'. oswoot OOUWTY 1 w i` V) , �• .• mf c Goo.a to+a�+% , : r 0 ,i,).- N . ! . i`_ y t O W O W 1 tJ 1-- _20- • I7S4/00Si0/11/4?IplStb hCli1 kir.ro) t CW .: Ljj+eY? �,At!t,r k.. *v r +•'�). Y r.1 1 �• !_ �•, .�. �.'~. .. •• '/tav!{TPs�:t_q��(?-' � �,r�`','4• 4,�Y%i� •].f1'' �. -�.�•'�i L ..y�1.,. L9R. } - • • 00 • • • • • EC shall maintain the Driveway Easement Area to a standard as • N. designated by HC in its reasonable discretion. If>s cots an Owner to • obligated to pay a prorate share of such maintenance do so within ten (10) business days of written demand therefor accompanied by substantiating invoices, then interest on the unpaid amount shall bear interest at eighteen percent (18%) per annum until paid and the other Owners shall have the rights and remedies r^., provided in Section 12 of this Agreement. • IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement. • pOWELL-ORlLLIA ASSOCIATES, a HCWA REALTY CORP. , a Washington . ....-: Washington general partnership corporation •' B t By Lloyd W. Powell t�,s�sMt General Partner Its • By _ - Peter W. Powell It>s �o r.,t ,�,�,,,,�.,; General Partner ' • A - Legal Description of HC Property ,.- g - Site Plan 'W C - Legal Description of Powell Property U D - Utility Plan �u G E - Driveway Easement Area • ,`, r- p - Wetlands Preservation Easement Area J 1- N • „ r W ..F- 0 N o J . 0 L., V C r -18- , MC1M-�t.tr) 1714./C t6/17/02tD 16 ... •• '••• r••• ' • ', s.: 4-!w,...^Z.4.n/1"trioV`.3'f r•q•.4 3i»; siil"•''''V:. P, .4 0 7 : . • • ss. I COUNTY or ) On this day of , 1992, before re, a Notary Public in and for the Statee g Wa hington► duly commissioned and sworn, permonally appe to me known to be the the corporation maned in and respectively, of RCWA REALTY CORP., which executed the foregoing instr% Lant; and they acknowledged to n me that they signed the same as the free and voluntary act and deed i of said corporation for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. ,I • I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that the . • persons appearing before me and making this acknowledgment are the i ' persons whose true ;,ignatures appear on this document. ' _. WITNESS my hand and official seal-the -day and year. in this. - -_ above written. certificate ,// Jf `M } M ' NOTARy(/PUBLIC in ar,�d E,Dr the ate of residing at y coma ce on expires:. • s . µARY T.SIATTERY • Moiety ruMic ' My Commission Expires Match 12.1293 • . • ' • N ' 0 N • in •CO p CI J D 7 �. -2 U- uee,,.,,r.n., ir,4ioos3u»ivatanu 1 ' ..,.; p .r^I:..; 13('� M�' t Fyn' t i.• R D ... �','� �_J �_,j! t v.t•'��sa r1 r -....,•-...,v,.. . '4 '•C` „Lj,tit ••'e. •:::r..L. 4 • - .... . • 1TICE: I= THE DOCUP 7 T•'IS r '.KE IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE l i .3 DUE TO '1: _ .•i•LITY C= TFi COCUMEliT. 1 . i , • a;, l: 9206302702 . -ir 51 5 4.:' g 1;, i 41, 41 Cr +. 1 I I i • '/:" . '. ; i i 'i H . -, c il. a k'• to a i ... t 4 • ow `y1.L• , M1 :--}fr n ;,.*5.r i ......_,...-- .....'...Y • is • ' • t _ . S.W.34TH STREET - - - t il Cor - 11 (.' I I j er . , .) aft 71: r I • O • 1 i • I • lot .�Y, y .1i , 1 i j _ / C , I I ' I - 1Vpi.' 1L-• , ,1 1 "''C�``�C/��'��-- _ III: "' I < 1 t..� ® „ii_�WplltWwpUIlA1..111glt' ;i.1ll1 M1111.113 _X_ .'.:' L rm t..I..P. r.srcx • 1 i...,l 1t 1 1 1 i p d Dili .. .,, , • C.I1..- . i,,. .... .•......... . ',V 01.11, I !. cps� _ . ._ _•.: II WU1lIIl«:11i!>t1 kall >il' - . _ t� • . i s- ���� 11 WWUir:Wl!l1 'Iwo• I. 1 p i ��n 1 C' SITE o !: -BA putottrtfi a:�I� 1 r:�, C: tI I-2 ; -----:=.:--; .5.,.•.._...._ !. 1- _.... ._ ... . ..... •• ... Ill"• , t:.: „ . j. I j . : 1. . - ell _1 i ", -_ 1 ;,11111111-wll '1Jr1 i I �, _ • • O -- ' i11n11111'�Ililnllh dinRil�y J I , \ ]i \\ �'�• IN. '4-- • _ ii i-Iii-V '�`i Giiit i 1 `� 1 . �� �� •l . 1.' i • I �'�_. ._.__._._._ •'-•- •� R�I w ��.. ..' is j i I. 0 I ` ,. sie, .41mr--4., •• ;win .i [ a y , !i': Lot 1 tiiiiiiinhe4 A01 A PAM i ::-.) lit_._ NRA I.% 'VAX11[TM. IllI ..=- I1, . r -----t-----------1-4'--- --- -}-2L.— "--- .,.. ------- -- --- t �. • r- STREET SITE PLAN I ` •o .. J.W. 1S , T KEE 1".4® -a� 0 --'--.-.-. • ,.'• 1 1. .: - i 1 , . . , _ IMMIX ,...._.... .. .... , Li." , S W 34TH STREET- -- -- --- - - - - - -.- 7 iI.. ., , ili t i ! I . 1 i .. • 1 I i, L , • r• 1 ,_ ; 11111101111 • . I : 1 - .' litteletri3 •• i > 11 i I i , ' DA • : • I -. . i . " -.7:-=:•—••.— i = . ...... . I I • I , i!I , - -• '' '. . i ..- ...- , ,,..._. 1 — 1 WI •T'ENIIIIIIIZWNgif ter.MVE:rit....441 1-.. . , . . , :-..-.......,.-4., .. Igt 401040011,4* 1.i 1_ .. i F.---...:th.....•:-=...*:.^. I _. "A, se mar-- ' II • i : 1 _.................. • ' - 7.5 - • , ,r,siArsrti al c.•ev i _ _....._ r. 1 , :,. ,..,........ r. : .., tz.......: r. , li _. ...... . il 5, 1 ,,,, .1: L _ ...,.. I . 7:.+ -.1.+. . __. • v.) 1 - . 1, -.-.-:-....-:.--:.-F.L.......• -- - 1 - i • .. • i.c.0 ....Irmo ••••• . ."... ... IL...". 111211/"Erilli IltUnkliallOn . .. I 1 . 0 1 • r i IIIMM .....r.........6u ,, 1 -Iirf . . . L...I • CNI SIE PLAN I , -....;_ii=a447:1_11Zri I ' _„,...,-. 1"1310'-0" 1:11 I • I )- J 111111111141111144111=1-11Ws ''''' ' 4.•==nra .'"a"'":::r-:-.5.:-.,AN i I. 1 • _ i• ' ...101: X it ‘ a.i. . ••• •• , ..... ••••..... e/ ' ............ •-• i 'CD • f.="..... ... .... .. . '1 • ra..._ ; .. ,.., . , no' . g e"• ' ' I . : 1 - - .... 7---: ,.........- I I. ---.• -. ... .. . ..- . i I, -..---..-....: 7 . i. all a: II 1 ' • 1---) , ..::::::::1 rz....r.: 1 i, ::74.'-'',..a= 7..... . . . I . ... - - .- - ' ' -7,11111111-r , .1. - 1 2 . .....) ', ...--"---. - / : •—....— ph' . .—......-. . i • iirt:o"... 1.fiCW22.X I I I , •••:. I I I, i. ' • •••., I .I f ! 1 \ IN 11. S i I ..". ;fillinir:infillit: aTInfirA 0 will 1 - • 1,,,‘' ! 1 \ \..., , •amr-- 8111-1-M-1-1-+ Hill aN , • . , •,_. : 1, • " (5) \ .. _ ,„r., .4-4-a 1.!•i • ' ,1:..r./I- . • Nillitiga=4.11 • .7- -.-. - X -- ------ • , .L. ,401414:41:11411: .- 1., _.,.. i . . •. . • „ AO!A PA/ft • .. .- . ,....r4ir. P . I .AL 0 1 (9 1 3 ,ir ,, ... n L.) ii:• 'ifiltireitiir X.•'''• '••• • :-.--.- - -I-t•-•• ---:..:-...:-. ------Lf--J---- --- I '••• i ...•: . . - -.. -.-.. -....-....-. _ W • .- -- =.---7...---- -....- ,-------...--......----.----..---.- ..-...-...-........-- , , C‘ W 41S T SI REET ...., c_ SITE PLA, I , ., . )1i . ra40'-0 's 11 r . -..% • - PNtlee0 ' - • 3.1 11) L, TX;it 1043 . • I f. thalV . . i.3 b . Saititotit, • YHT3r1j3 - i . . - - - .-•• . - . _,. _ ... ' as . , anomaessaa....a......oraiditi - 1 ......=...,- -- - - • - - S.W.34TH S-7L- 1 _ ..... .. • ,, . i , ;. , sr. ri C r 1 • I . I l• II . I 9 • I I '.- '..-- • r•- / . .• : • i > 11. . 1 0 I < I : ,,_......- -7// .1aIi- •-'• ,....... ...;"...0.000#0#1/ .............ra• . ''''• . .' Opel,.Ira• Lais , _ i . - --_6-_- --_-- _ . = } 11111. i ,_ r ..t -- *44.1 i PEW .. ..."'iMMiliiIIPOIMEMILWEIMER L MilliMp. .161"'11 1 • r .-. ! — r. riiileatlailil i - i • ... LIMMil i - • : 1 r,ao.uctrio 0 iCEE------ --1,IdailuilliWiiii : 1 i , • r 1 '-.. .:1 • i .. i =17.--- , __...-_=-:. .• ,, 7 g • - - if . , r-7 .• u., zr. ... .• • -1 ..— - 1 ..• i r..--rz:...-•:..... --- ., i- -.- ....--- * , ' i I Int STA.11171=4 'I 0 Tv; I • , • ;:. .F.:._.. =:-- . 1 • • ...... _ . iliti ... 1:1 .1:4 : • . i . 11 . , . , . . r I .. CD I ••••••••...ma.II. Imo• .....,........••••••v..• . • r'2•11.497.1 11 LUWURI:1111111111, fl i _ - IN• I ir.=-...r. :---7- • rc"- I . •- CV Co 1 ; --., al...1 .......... •web- I ==iiiii WIL10144101111 cn SITE PLAN [ i! ...11M7ra 1.* CD 1"■40'-0" j iiishati,..z..:-.2— 11=11 iiii.M.111111.1rIlimisor ot , tr......., , . c4 , ..... —-- 1 ..,.. - . ..11! cr) mob i F-1---- :V. • NU i . -•'"" 1--, -. •—I 11 .:÷7-3.-:-...74=..6: .• ,...---". • .._/- PI" 11 01i0 .9MMlliii . ! ...-...--.=-:. .--..:..- • ;I. •• ':-7- ("...) ..) , ! ..........- . ..... e. ....'\ . /Kir • 4 71.. ..a111. 1 kii • i • 4-1 ..i I : ! -\., -_, ....- I ;11111111112"1111111- Ili. iffillifl'. I') I' • ''. 1 rtl.111r IMP 1%.,, •ea I ••••••••11i . ..•/ ... , 1 •-v, N... . . , _., I; N,s, . . (..) . -----N a. .-- • -. • . —4- ..,..- ._,.._._._ _._._ ._... iiiiagarowitrii7 .4 " ..;.. i. -.4 • ;. rit 1 . :-\— ---- \,i ...r---..-'. ..V.Igi. '•r- 1 \-._ \---- ---- Rilli, a a VII 4 klagmarilla m•........1 I • .0., w.eduilill. • gus........usammq ., , • . , il 1 IIPmr....z. 8114:14 5 '•1 I .• ' ..,t•P.1 ' 1 :11.ike• 3; ..r! ; .. ..,) • El )2(t pi n J 'NAME I•14. ,,,i, . ifit-i; i . . W.P"Kt K1 lir 44 7:41 . -• —-—7—1--— —•--—7.----t—i- — • : .... , • 1"040'-0" • -- • ..., •:: • • 4.17 C 4. PG 1 .•-i b ) I_ al-mot a . • ,,. _ . . . _ ,- • - • •• .• ' . - - I . • -- - i;Vic: :Ng' L'ut.! 7 : T :::-'ai. ?S LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE 1 ,.3 DU_ TO •1 _ ',ITT ',F Te_ CG:e4v,EST. . 41... .ram f, • 9206302702 '•E:.`. '� ;' •`:- • i • , I. 4.... ,....it,:.., ...:.... . .... ... . ,.:.,.,.. "......r.t••... .. ..,.t •. ; , a. , ..,.....,.„i.,....4,•.;•:.71.1'..,1:'..........t:..,; :i! bi 17‘ • . 0 i 1 i 5 6 i•.', :•.,,: ;.r:� ' 11 V i 1..AtdH 1 "L'i}. : i! i W .:-:-.v't.**:,it':-•'-.‘,1:'.:•,::''..t.::::'' 0 . • C i 3 ..,,.....:., ,,:::,-,...,.......•::..-.... ... . • •.. • . r 0 1 • ' , , .S DUE 10 1 _ .. L. f '...r Ir.- .,U.U.•ahI. 1 tom- ...�to...vy . _.__1 3 . - -1 9206302702 c__— -- —--- _ _ 0 .O b;..I -��-- i� . ,r,• Ullilll�lll—ti +;:L �� / --N id' AII�I1fl `JNIa�/�i`J AdVNIWIlAdd �` � I r �, __,I l op III I, iii,,,=-',x —I11 lidiArr xi III , IA 11114.TO)."Mriftli =,......,,, ,•:-.1.::-", • --..pr. flEk 9. • N I I 3 , , _ '11 I i 01-0 j• ; / \A .i, .1am .A�1 : II ng 1 ..:E-4- L I L ling 11J' '.IWDI:� ( '-'4.'�:I I ..- r. - rii r ii bilp I MD 1.401.41Mi wol -4,4, .fraEr -..vjg '1 J.\ 7 IVI ��r / • lard v 1or+ Y ••w- J Il c . I _ L i, \ . I{ . . 0 z)\ rE � , I f.I i ® I 13Sf15 NI K MS • ......—.. ,_ _ _ / \ -tom` P_A :— 1 _. _...-__ (--- r' i . g r . . .,,, a cn i1h !t CD O K i I - ---•--- -- N. Z yr -- - - - '` r .s Ali - - Q? T ': r _. it ..: > f 1 . it: It 1 kr ili ifL•4011 . i . 1:06 \ r N Imoom. , . �i " v. �. • � � 1 .�.- �o .Q If 1 It1 . 111. 'It r nr Irit.7. .9r I: a I i t .. 1 w �w�llw��ww w w Y • / aidli • Nib Aril V. I IIIIV '••••in• memo IVIVIVII 0. !k. „: . , ,,, ' Tii.4.1 e , -.' ,dA . CiLlft-, i I .„, 1 ----_, --- - -es"LIteai......i...iirmaziai'll....2.M-i . ..iva..,..---_—___,----5...., •rn._,,......, . 1..7_ _._______. pai I CAST VAIIEr H6iw A7 IT!I 1 -:1 SL,ln r1URN 5. ASSOCBATL�S PACE .REMB RS P REHOUSE - LI a`3iii3 'A6iT[cTi rortv+ .'L..�--iD.:Y�.fy7_,, ,� / M N[ ..n Sam v rm m�II,.� v..►WOtr. . CS1.«4.::L ,� gii15 if P. • I - 1 w. _- . . BU.H. ROED a HITCHINGS. INC. • EXHIBIT E ACCESS EASEMENT DESCRIPTION THAT PORTION OF LOT 7 OF BURLINGTON NORTHERN, ACCORDING TO THE • BINDING SITE PLAN THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME /Cl OF BINDING SITE PLANS, PAGES THROUGH /./ , RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, . 1 WASHINGTON, LYING WITHIN A STRIP OF LAND 30.00 FEET IN WIDTH, HAVING 15.00 FEET OF SUCH WIDTH ON EACH SIDE OF. AN EASEMENT CEN- • • I TERLINE DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THENCE NORTH COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT '; 01°50'09" EAST 18.00 FEET ALONG THE EAST LINE THEREOF TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF SAID EASEMENT CENTERLINE AND THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTHEAST HAVING A RADIUS 120.00OF FEET (TRADIAL E THROUGH BEGINNING 00 00°54'35" WEST) , HENCE ALONG SAID CENTERLINE THE FOLLOWING THREE • . - - THENCE WESTERLY AND NORTHWESTERLY 109.33 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 52.12'09"; THENCE NORTH 36.53'17"' WEST 173.08 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 120.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY AND WESTERLY 83.40 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 39°49'13" TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 7 AND THE IERMINUS OF SAID EASEMENT CENTERLINE, AND FROM SAID TERMINUS SAID r-INT OF BEGIN- = NING BEARS SOUTH 49°02'54" EAST, 352:66 FEET DISTANT. t, TETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF SAID LOT 7 DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: J OG i “' BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE NORTHERLY MARGIN OF THEI. STRIP DESCRIBED ABOVE AND SAIL' WESTERLY LINE OF LOT 7, SAID POINT ,. OF BEGINNING BEING THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE WEST ► .�5 • HAVING A RADIUS OF 2043.79 FEET (A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID 01 BEGINNING BEARS SOUTH 83°06'18" EAST) ; THENCE NORTHERLY 25.85 -. O FEET ALONG SAID CURVE AND WESTERLY LINE AS SHOWN ON SURVEY •:� RECORDED IN VOLUME 80 OF SURVEYS PAGE 156, RECORDS OF SAID KING • 04 COUNTY, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 00°43 '29"; THENCE SOUTH O 83°49 '47" EAST 8.80 FEET ALONG A LINE RADIAL TO THE PRECEDING CURVE TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE TO THE o GD NORTHEAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 35.00 FEET (A RADIAL LINE THROUGH ~ CD SAID BEGINNING BEARS NORTH 82°50'29" WEST) ; THENCE SOUTHERLY AND oNJ SOUTHEASTERLY 43.16 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE ,^ OF 70°39'02" TO SAID NORTHERLY MARGIN OF THE STRIP DESCRIBED - • ABOVE AND A POINT OF CUSP WITH A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTH HAv'ING A RADIUS OF 135.00 FEET (A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT OF CUSP BEARS NORTH 26°30'29"- EAST) ; THENCE WESTERLY 32.76 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE AND NORTHERLY MARGIN THROUGI! A CENTRAL ANGLE OF . 13°54 '21" TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; - / ‘ I/2 • 1 0 0 aSk BUSH, ROED 8c HITCHINGS, IN:- ` ALSO TOGETHER WITJ THAT PORTION OF SAID LOT 7 DESCRIBED AS FOL- LOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTHWESTERLY MARGIN OF THE STRIP DESCRIBED ABOVE AND SAID WESTERLY LINE OF LOT 7, SAID POINT •• 1 OF BEGINNING BEING THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTH- WEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 105.00 FEET (A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID i BEGINNING BEARS NORTH 14°07'06" EAST) ; THENCE EASTERLY AND SOUTH- EASTERLY 71.46 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE AND SOUTHWESTERLY MARGIN = THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 38°59'37" TO A POINT OF TANGENCY ON SAID SOUTHWESTERLY MARGIN AND A POINT OF CUSP WITH A CURVE CON- CAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 35. 19 FEET (A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT OF CUSP BEARS NORTH 53°06'43" EAST) ; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY, WESTERLY, SOUTHWESTERLY AND SOUTHERLY 80.63 FEET_ ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 131°16'32" TO THE EASTERLY PROLONGATION OF A RADIAL LINE TO SAID WESTERLY LINE . OF LOT 7 WHICH BEARS SOUTH 80°46'54" EAST; THENCE NORTH 80°46'54" WEST -2.60 FEET TO SAID WESTERLY LINE OF LOT 7 AND THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE TO THE WEST HAVING A RADIUS OF • 2043.79 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY 52.70 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE AND WESTERLY LINE 0 F LOT 7 AS SHOWN ON SURVEY RECORDED IN VOLUME 80 OF SURVEYS, PAGE 156, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLF OF O1°28'39" TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. `- N THE SIDELINES OF THIS EASEMENT SHALL BE SO SHORTENED OR LENGTH- ;,, O j t`• ENED SO AS TO TERMINATE IN SAID EAST LINE AND SAID WESTERLY LINE , , (V OF LOT 7. J O ,•• Cl SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON CD O THE PAPCFT. DESCP.IBE[ _ BOVE CONTAINS 1^' I 272 SQUARE ET FE (0.(0."., ACRES) , MORE OR LESS. ` i- _ POWELL DEVELOPMENT BURLINGTON NORTHERN BSP A, C WILLIAM A. HICKOX, P.L.S. o ` 3w�o�w,Acy�'�p+ BUNE JOB,NO. 91407.08/SUR54B ,-- 40 0 • 2 ; �� 5• iy REVISED JUNE 26, 1992 ,, ; / ' 6 s 4,1t:.n� ; Z6 9z %1 i IIMPES Lin.r 2/2 1- 1 1 -- • f Mary . c BUSH, ROED& HITCHINGS, IN . '51. EXHIBIT F:::.7 -..'"1:::;'. 4 SOUTH WETLAND DESCRIPTION THAT PORTION OF LOT 7 OF BURLINGTON NORTHERN, ACCORDING TO THE :•• BINDING SITE PLAN TH,F.REOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 4 / OF BINDING SITE PLANS, PAGES d"- // , RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, _ DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: Y C: BEGINNING AT THE CORNER COMMON TO SAID LOT 7 AND LOTS 2 AND 3 OF . SAID BINDING SITE PLAN; THENCE NORTH 88•09 '51" WEST 75.00 FEET; ;: THENCE SOUTH O1.50'09' WEST 383.62 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 55.26'54" 1 { EAST 3.99 FEET TO SAID EAST LINE OF LOT 7; THENCE ALONG SAID EAST 1 i LINE THE FOLLOWING TWO COURSES: , . `: ti - THENCE NORTH 28.33'51" EAST 159.29; THENCE NORTH 01.50'09" EAST ;.r._. c� 243.51 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. o i - _ SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. h . `i.�: • THE PARCEL DESCRIBED ABOVE CONTAINS 23 , 833 SQUz.RE FEET (0.55 ;x • ACRES) , MORE OR LESS. , POWELL DE'.' LOPMENT BURLINGTON "ORTHERN BSP j6 WILLIAM A. HICKOX, P.L.S. I-"- • 04 JUNE 2, 1992 u WC J M A-Hie,. 91407.08/SUR54B ,-,, i' � fA•s411 ,O J 3' o + T ► Q. rCA v V . T r11 I, m .+ 040 i O W 0 L.J x n _ i w u r • • A. • - r.+ ia.k:+iaia•.i'r.lY` ;'41.,i....•;•.:,:.: Q Y"., 7_. ,• I 6 .•••••• •••••.`.:. vowNew •::.. • '••••• . . ..,'i .• .• I N . . ,. . .... \j.) ' /40' Rol/rood Rio?I t of Woy 1.1.1...,1 i '.. • • t:-'1 r i ... 1,..;'--.II ....... , • i ..,.,... ... tiJi • • ....: 1 •rz ::.;:i •••••.e.'N. I t :',..." . ..:$. . .., . A•'...:::.; • •-• r t."11)..0• *ez... . ..-. :....•,1::. , >h ' . ..;,_.. ,....: f.".ilk..).., .....- ''.:'i.tZ.. . ' .; •••• 1 4..,..... .-. X 1 1•".1 l''.:•'_,•Z4: . • • 1 ' ,...::. •.-.7-:•= .. i:;7:; • - •f•• P O.B No Y 1.• s . Scale 1 ;',..4%.• z:.k;:.... i .•-•.• I I I 6e'09'.5/'FY•,..,•...•:::".. : :;• ..41,:•-• •-•• k':•.*.:1 1,- 7500' eq 1.,%.; • .-• 0 1.••• s• ..- 72:.,1 • • " 1 1•• i CV ./.....(..)i i ;-• *8 LP Y..e...)7... s'?• 4....., . 0 - ‘D ti t .• ,;:.:bt: • - - • ..:•...' . ..7..: • 0 0./ • • •-..-.....F.- 2 ,••••••••• ? CT) .:••.:.; ! • 1. • .• . i,-) .4, ; ••••.•':;:. i',I* li 8 R 0) : • • i lei .. •t.• = •-.,. • ,_ I . 6) \A. ..• :. ::•;----..., 5 . 5 55'26'54°E---. 4 fo(i.). ...-. : 3 99' - I • •I..t • . 40, . • .-....7- .L•J ...•-,.;.. i ft)12 %%) .1.0 . • ;Le) ..' • ....... c.) t,.. .,:.• ..„:.-. 1—“-..' / \-.,,_; I • I• ... I • :, t.;:'' 1 . :-..:....; h.:....: .,.... .:...- • •• SOUTH WETLAND SKETCH __ ,- •- POWELL DEVELOPMENT .--• t...) '•."-•• S'' BuRiNG-roN NofrN BINDING SITE PLAN i f CM . . • . . ....J 1•A A•if/ ‹,0....-........._....0+ - . .' -by viksifit,' •...9i..• sq. vtn'ciii4, .. A. •' "Js rtg.V.• 111 ..qr - 1 ..,..: .... ,,, •.. .., ,,,„ PRE 0 : 7,\ , ! ..••1 I t5r 2.11 \,:t\s„,,:r..1..4:.t...,:r!.;•:-/.4:::::',,:::::1.4:4) § BUSH,ROED a HITCHINGS,INC. - i . / i a) SEAL ;7, CIVil ENGINEERS a LAND suRvEroPs • . . - . • IIKI TLC wASHIPKITON •;)•••• J0840.0407.08 68-92 CLC WAN 1. f)144 1 NU?14- /SAfiNG1° . •477-...?•-.V...11:7".V77.f. • . • •,- I I •• I • ••...... I ' —. . - -. .. . -. .. - - .. ._. .. ... ..—.- .. • . _ .... -•- 9 • r r • • . MTPaesa • Alb BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS, I'!C. • EXHIBIT F NORTH WETLAND DESCRIPTION • THAT PORTION OF LOT 7 OF BURLINGTON NORTHERN, ACCORDING TO THE BINDING SITE FLAN THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME / / OF BINDING SITE PLANS, PAGES —!, , RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: • • BEGINNING At THE CORNER COMMON TO SAID LOT 7 AND LOTS 2 AND 3 OF • • SAID BINDING SITE PLAN; THENCE NORTH 881,09'51" WEST 70.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 01'50'09" EAST 472.81 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID • LOT 7; THENCE SOUTH 87°50'47" EAST 70.00 FEET ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 7; THENCE SOUTH O1'50'09" WEST �. 472.42 FEET ALONG SAID EAST LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. v1 --THE-PARCEL DESCRIBED ABOVE -CONTAINS '33,083 SQUARE FEET (0.76 _ .:,..• ' = ACRES) , MORE OR LESS. - 4 POWELL DEVELOPMENT BURLINGTON NORTHERN BSP W . WILLIAM A. 3ICKOX, P.L.S. W 2 MA N! JUNE 2, 1992 I�, _ `�� c� 91407.08/SUR54B �.,.04 wow O� ,JJ trt i•• Oro �..� CD . y t 2 r. is . CV'AE3 3l17l • O W CD O x .n • ' I 1! 4 ' • ..--. . 4.0111WWW ...---- ..- - S 87'50'4•7• -., '.: 1• cii'l 111411141 40 I• ...."11V •. 0 e• : .r....irt..., LI' ?-1 .I. - ..I ...pas Nt . U.) • 111 4 ,•,4 , 1 2 :— LOT ..., 111 o ..... ›.. • •;.. , 0.4.- 415 —r4 k • 'cC. 9-. 1,.. k n... (-.)1.•,1 ,b. t•:::, , . • ,....... . \ . . R OB. r No Scoie 1 1 I N • .7000.-•:., N 880'51'Y1 N 66'09'5eise 1 N N IC ...:-• 1:-i • ) I X 1 •- i cl .. - I - . - . . - 0.4 . .. ... . . . . • . °I %.("-:1 . I . • , ",11-4 y..— ....t t....1,1; I ::.•...- i cb 1•1 li„,y,1 I . C....) Eh ..... • . 4...1j.1 : i 2 / kr) . I.. •.?.. 0..4' J / . , I . 5 --... / . , r . De • ...,.140, / ..,, --.1 { • • t OIL t..1 ! \\•••'• I 7•._ I - - I, i I - . • " : NORTH WETLAND.- SKETCH , - . • . 1,....! ._ ... ....0 POWELL DEVELOPMENT _ __ =I— §'= EKFILINGTON NORTHERN BINDING SITE PLAN w rz 4 A.fp •f ,\‘• 't VIA.4.--.. 0 • .. - 4 r 0' v r • b WTCHoz. • w - .ti .4444 PRUNED BY; . — • cr°134;rI, % • , r . • tO r BUSH,ROED& IiITCHINGS,INC. 4) 1-61.7TERO 4'64' CIVIL ENGINEERS&LAND SURVLYORS i i SEAL I: KOMI,WhIII44•0 T OH 313 0.418 \4.11141.I.A14). . k 11111,41.3 win14- "e" J08 Ni:).9$4Cr7.00 et-849 at wan • • AISHINGI° • . . • % . . _ . • — . —. . ... - • . t— 7. -...... . • PIRBT AMENDMENT TO 1 RECIPROCAL EASEMENT AGREE::nnNT $ J This Amendment is made and entered into by and among / 1 HCWA Realty Corp. , a Washington corporation ("tiV") , Powell- i?' Orillia Associates, a Washington general partnership ("Powell") , .. Eastgate Theatre, Inc. , an Oregon corporation ("Pastaate") , Peter W. Powell ("P, Powell") and Lloyd W. Powell ("1.. Powell") . I RECITALS M HC and Powell previously have entered into a Reciprocal F Easement Agreement with Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions dated June 30, 1992, and recorded in the Official Records of King County, Washington, under Fee No. 9206302702 (the "Agreement") . A Powell subsequently conveyed Lot 1 (defined in the Agreement) to P. Powell and L. Powell who own Lot 1 as equal tenants in common. Contemporaneously with the execution of this Amendment, sii Eastgate is acquiring Lot 3 (defined in the Agreement as modified g by the lot line adjustment mentioned below) from HC. In 1) conjunction with that acquisition, the parties hereto (singly, an "Owner", and collectively, the "Owners") desire to clarify and restate certain provisions of the Agreement. AGREEMENT .?- Therefore, in consideration of the premises and other valuable consideration, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Owners agree as follows (unless otherwise indicated, all capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings as are attributed to them in the Agreement) : ir 1. Each of the Owners warrants and represents to the other Owners that the warranting Owner owns fee title to the , portion of the Shopping Center listed below and that the CI warranting Owner has not created, assumed, or acquiesced to any C, indebtedness secured by liens encumbering the portion of the Shopping Center owned by such Owner : Cr) O N OWNER L2. CD L. Powell and P. Powell Lot 1 Ul CI HC Lot 2 Eastgate Lot 3 Powell Lots 4, 6 _ 1- and 7 The Owners also acknowledge and agree that the common boundary between Lot 2 and Lot 3 has been modified by Lot line adjustment reflected in Lot Line Adjustment Map recorded in the Official Records of King County, Washington, under Fee No. )511299006. run FOR R CORI) AT REQUEST OF — 1 - FIRST AMENDMENT TO RECIPROCA'. 1'KA'�'SL'NER1Cp7T�F ��' 1Rp,N� EASEMENT AGREEMENT lrwwitourks/1EIJ+�tiali i� CO. T 3'11 l(rall AVE. NE P O. BOX N9a • � BEUIVUE. WA 9t0)9 :A. .. 6 . ' / (I) ' -- • + 1 .. A 11 L IL s YIRBT AMENDMENT TO i RECIPROCAL EASEMENT AGREEWEili f This Amendment is made and entered into by and among :gl / HCWA Realty Corp., a Washington corporation ("lc") , Powell- 1 ✓0 orillia Associates, a Washington general partnership ("Powell") , Eastgate Theatre, Inc., an Oregon corporation ("Eastgate") , it Peter W. Powell ("P. Powell") and Lloyd W. Powell ("J., Powell") . RECITALS HC and Powell previously have entered into a Reciprocal Easement Agreement with Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions dated June 30, 1992, and recorded in the Official Records of King County, Washington, under Fee No. 9206302702 (the "Agreement") . A Powell subsequently conveyed Lot 1 (defined in the Agreement) to P. Powell and L. Powell who own Lot 1 as equal tenants in common. Contemporaneously with the execution of this Amendment, Eastgate is acquiring Lot 3 (defined in the Agreement as modified by the lot line adjustment mentioned below) from HC. In M conjunction with that acquisition, the parties hereto (singly, an "Qwner", and collectively, the "Owners") desire to clarify and restate certain provisions of the Agreement. AGREEMENT Therefore, in consideration of the premises and other valuable consideration, the sufficiency of which is hereby (-›`-, acknowledged, the Owners agree as follows (unless otherwise indicated, all capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings as are attributed to them in the Agreement) : 1. Each of the Owners warrants and represents to the other Owners that the warranting Owna: owns fee title to the portion of the Shopping Center listed below and that the CI Ch warranting Owner has not created, assumed, or acquiesced to any Ch indebtedness secured by liens encumbering the portion of the r4 Shopping Center owned by such Ownei : ao OCV OM. L4 t O L. Powell and P. Powell Lot 1 CD CI HC Lot 2 Eastgate Lot 3 Powell Lots 4, 6 and 7 The Owners also acknowledge and agree that the common boundary between Lot 2 and Lot 3 has been modified by Lot line adjustment reflected in Lot Line Adjustment Map recorded in the Official Records of King County, Washington, under Pee No. 9511299006. FILET) F:)R R:XCORI) AT REQUEST OF 1 1 - FIRST AMENDMENT TO RECIPROCAL FRANSAMERI 1 ti EASEMENT AGREEMENT mewl IJ) A. k CO. J S1l) 1)KTN AVE. NE PO BOX 1493 BEL ZVLJE.W Xf9 iitaliwimmiliwirsim 9$ v . • , .. : ,. 1- p i1 2. The third 3enten^.e of Section 2.1 of the Agreement , is deleted and the following scbstituted in lieu thereof: Th Owner of each Lot agrees to construct and maintain parking on its Lot to serve the improvements erected from time to time on such Lot equal to the greater of (i) the number of parking spaces required by applicable law at the time that building permits are issued for the improvements to be I constructed, or (ii) the following ratio: 1.421 Parkins Ratio Lots 1, 2 & 3 4.1 stalls for each 1,000 , square feet of Floor Area Lots 4, 6 & 7 5.0 square feet forlls 1,000 feetof Floor Area Notwithstanding the foregoing parking requirements, if Cr) any portion of Lot 3 is developed for the purpose of Cn operating a cinema, then such portion of Lot 3 shall be N-4 served by parking stalls equal to the greater of (xi CT the.number of parking stalls required by applicable law p with respect to theatre use at the time that building (4 permits are issued for the improvements to be O constructed, or (y) one (1) parking stall for every 01 CZ constructed, (4) seats in the movie theatres erected on Lot 3; provided, however, that if applicable law permits less intense parking for cinema use (i.e. , one (1) parking stall is allowed to serve more than four (4) seats in a r.inema) after Jrnurry 1, 2006, then the parking within such portion of Lot 3 that is used for the operation of a cinema may be reduced to the level permitted by applicable law so long as such reduction in parking does not materially and adversely affect the parking within, or use of, Lots 4 and 6. 3. Sectior 3.1(4) is amended by adding the following sentences thereto: 11 2:otr.ithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, the Owners acknowledge and agree that Lot 3 may include development of up to three (3) outlot pads (the "Lot 3 Fads") , each containing yip to 6,000 square feet of Floor Area, and such Lot 3 Pads may be situated anywhere within Lot 3 as the Owner thereof may designate from outtime • so long as the en me do not (i) ntimect the building setback lines created by Section 3.1(b) of the Agreement, and (ii) lie west of the north-south line dividing the • portion of Lot 3 which is currently zonsd 2 - FIRST AMENDMENT TO RECIPROCAL isewirov�viro3wai.m7n EASEMENT AGREEMENT 4 ■ s I commercial arterial from the portion zoned medium industrial, such line being sit.,a,..,- approximately 140 feet west of the west right-of-way line of East Valley Highway and coinciding with the eastern boundary of Lot 47 provided, however, that such east-west limitation regarding the location of the Lot 3 Pads (x) shall not be applicable if Eastgate is precluded from constructing a cinema on Lot 3 and opening the same for business, and (y) shall not apply to any Pad lying south of a line coinciding with the northerly boundary of Lot 4. The Exclusive Building Area for Lot 3 shall be deemed to include the Lot 3 Pads. One of the Lot 3 Pads currently is expected to be developed in the portion of Lot 3 that lies near the intersection of Southwest 41st Street and f a East Valley Highway (the "South Pad") cinema is erected on Lot 3 by Eastgate and opened for business, then Eastgate agrees, solely for the benefit of the Owner of Lot 4, not to erect any improvements on the South Pad prior to January 1, 1999, other than such improvements as may be necessary to use the South Pad area for parking purposes; this covenant of Eastgate is solely for the benefit of Lot 4 and may be enforced only by C.) the Owner of Lot 4. CI Cl 4. Section 4.1 of the Agreement is hereby deleted and r4 (1'J the following substituted in lieu thereof: O 4.1 Grant of Easements. Subject to the 0 provisions of Section 15.13, each Owner, as . O jj � grantor, hereby grants to the other Owners, C) for the benefit of said other Owners and their respective tenants and such Owners' and tenants' customers, invitees and employees, a nonexclusive easement to use, for the purposes of obtt'ning access to and from the Shopping Center, ,.he roadways and walkways situated in the Common Area and any facilities which mry be erected in the Common Area for the general 'se of customers of the Shopping Center (such as mass transit shelters) , all as more particularly located and described on the attached Site Plan, as the same may cnange from time to time. The ill ° - foregoing grants of easements are not effective as to any Lot which is part of the Shopping Center until construction is • commenced on such Lot. 3 - FIRST AMENDMENT TO RECIPROCAL ' ��� � � EASEMENT AGREEMENT Y y . .. - ji . ' E III The effect o_ this amen!'.m?.nt of Section 4.1 is to eliminate the III cross-parking easements formerly contained therein which created cross-parking easements among all Lots in the Shopping The Owners acknowledge and agree that the parking areas contained within their respective Lots shall be sufficient to service all parking needs of the improvements to be constructed therein and that they do not require parking easements over ttheh Owe Lots eofhereby the • other Owners. To give effect to the foregoing, s oe,easements Owner were quitclaims to the other Owners the p 9 created by Section 4.1 of the Agreement. Eacr Owner agrees to ' execute such additional documents and to give such zui�her , assurances as may be necessary to properly document the agreements of the Owners set forth herein from time to time. The Owners agree to use their reasonable efforts to prevent their respective tenants and customers, and the customers ofsstheir respective tenants, from using the parking another Lot. 5. The second and third sentences of Section 4.3(b) of the Agreement are deleted and the following substituted in • lieu thereof: Eastgate agrees that Powell may temporarily G7 use a portion of Lot 3 situated to the east CI of Lot 4 (out of and a part of the area Cl cross-hatched and designated as the "Powell Staging Area" on the Site Plan attached as • X Exhibit B to the Agreement) during the O initial construction of the building on Lot 4 CD and the building on Lot 6, provided that: (i) Eastgate has not constructed or commenced the construction of building improvements on the Lot 3 Pad situated in the Powell Staging Area at the time that Powell requests use of the Powell Staging Area for o:her purposes st 4 permitted herein; (ii) the or 6, as the case may be) previously has been • developed to the end that it is not available to serve as a sta-ling area (each of Lots 4 • and 6 to serve as staging areas for the other Lot ur._il they are developed) ; (iii) the portion of the Powell Staging Area to be used is no more than 10,000 squere feet in size and is bounded on the west, south and east by the west, south and east boundaries of the Powell Staging Area; (iv; Powell obtains all • permits required to be obtained from applicable governmental authorities to allow ® it to use the designated staging area; and (v) Powell holds Eastgate harmless from all claims, causes of action and liabilities which may be- asserted against Eastgate by • reason of Powell's use of the staging area. 4 - FIRST AMENDMENT TO RECIPROCAL 7swwi a7vz�7w3ww�wexon n r• �I 7 EASEMENT AGREEMENT • 6. The fourth paragraph of section 4.6 is deleted and the following substituted in lieu thereof: One sign may be located on Lot 7 in the location designated on the attached Site Plan. Such sign shall be divided into three equal blocks, one on top of the other. Any of the Owners of Lots 2, 3 or 7 initially may elect to construct such sign at the sole t expense of the Owner electing to initiate 1 such construction. The Owners who do not I undertake the initial construction nhofcsuc such may 4 sign (Powell, HC or Eastgate, as be) shall be entitled to use one of the sign blocks to advertise their respective businesses by reimbursing the constructing Owner for one-third of the cost of construction of the sign. The constructing Owner shall have sole control and use of each sign block until such time as an Owner 10, 1 entitled to use a sign bloc( elects to 1 contribute its one-third share of construction costs and use the sign block allocated to it. If HC elects to participate in the use of such sign, HC shall be entitled n to use the top block of such sign to advertise its business on Lot 2; if Eastgate C�1 elects to participate in the use of such 4.4 sign, then Eastgate shall be entitled to use (T the middle block to advertise its business on O Lot 3; and if Powell elects to participate in Cthe use of the sign, then Powell shall be (: entitled to use the bottom block of the sign 07 to advertise its businesses on Lot 7. The Owners participating in the use of the sign shall be obligated to share in the cost of maintaining the sign in proportion to the 1 number of sign blocks utilized by them. An 1 Owner shall have no obligation to pay any construction or maintenance costs with respect to such sign unless and until such Owner elects to . .,e the space on the sign allocated to it. No businesses may be advertised on such sign other than the I businesses conducted on Lots 2, 3 and 7. 7. Section 13.1 is amended by changing HC's address to: HomeBase, 3345 Michelson, Irvine, California 92715, Attn: ° Vice President Real Est:te; and adding thereto Eastgate's ill 45 address: 919 SW Taylor, Suite 900, Portland, Oregon 97205. 8. Section 15.10 of the Agreement is deleted and the following substituted in lieu thereof: t S - FIRST AMENDMENT TO RECIPROCAL swwiroo+zu�m»vw�uxu�.n EASEMENT AGREEMENT a• s • r • • l: .. ` _. _ .. - I` i • 15.17 li �lands• (a) Easement G a ts. Subject to the reservation set forth nto HC cec inn l5 10(bt, Powell hereby grants a perpetual easement appurtenant to Lot 2 (the "Hc Easement") over and across the portion of Lot 7 described in FxhibiI_"A" at attached hereto. Subject to the reservation set forth in erection 15 10(bl , Powell also • grants and conveys to Eastgate a perpetual easement appurtenant to Lot 3 (the ". Tst4g Easement") over and across the portion of Loc 7 described in Exhibit "13" attached hereto. Subject to the reservation set forth in 1 �. Section 15.10(bl , Eastgate hereby grants to • Powell a perpetual easement appurtenant to " wll Easement") over and • Lots 4 and 6 (the Powe across the portion of Lot 3 described in Exhibit "C" attached hereto. The HC, Eastgate and Powell Easements (the "Easements") may be used by the Owners of the Lots benefitted thereby (Lots 2, 3, 4 and 6, respectively) to provide wetlands mitigation, C7 storm drainage and storm water retention to Cl• serve Lots 2, 3, 4 and 6, respectively, in ro compliance with the requirements of the City of Renton and any other governmental • `r authorities with jurisdiction over the • CD authorities and use of Lots 2, 3, 4 and 6. CD N The improvements which have been erected or may be erected by such grantees in, on and • Q) under the land encumbered by the Easements (the "Easement Arels"1 may include (without limitation) bioswales, retention ponds, filtration systems, storm sewers, storm drains, and similar facilities. The HC Easement shall be appurtenant to and for the benefit of Lot 2 and shall run with title to Lot 2, regardless of whether any subsequent instruments of conveyance covering Lot specifically identify the HC Easement therein. The Eastgate Easement shall be appurtenant to and for the benefit of Lot 3 and shall run with title to Lot 3, regardless of whether any instrument of conveyance covering Lot 3 specifically identifies the Eastgate Easement. The Powell Easement shall be appurtenant to and for the benefit of Lots 4 and 6 and shall run with title to Lots 4 and 6, regardless of whether any • instrument of conveyance covering Lot 4 or Lot 6 specifically identifies the Powell Easement. The respective grantees of the Easements (the "Grantees") shall responsible for maintaining any drainage, 6 - FIRST AMENDMENT TO RECIPROCAL• isw�wIroovtL1mDvuetAwS3Wn�1 EASEMENT AGREEMENT .4r'i •S #! .ice. •.-•.. ;.i.F.' jR-'.. .i I • /"., •�"�i4,"�►• -W. ` • .. • • • • -„r!• . , w retention and other wetlands facilities • constructed thereon to the standardo designated by the City of Renton. The grantors of the Easements (the "Grantors") may not undertake any use of the Ea:em.nt Areas which would inhibit or interfere with the uses permitted to be undertaken thereon by the Grantees. The Grantors and subsequent owners of fee title to the land encumbered by the Easements shall be and remain liable for payment of all real property taxes levied against the land encumbered by the Easements; provided, however, that any Owner benefitted by an Easement may pay such taxes for the account of any Grantor or its successors who fail to pay the same. Powell, HC and Eastgate agree to execute such additional documents and to give such further assurances as may be necessary to properly document the creation of the Easements to facilitate the CIdevelopment of Lots 2, 3, 4 and 6 as C7 contemplated herein. (b) Easement Reservations. Eastgate reserves the right to u'se the portion of the Easement Areas O situated in Lot 3 in common with the Owners of C1 Lots 4 and 6 to provide wetlands mitigation, storm O drainage and storm water retention facilities to serve Lot 3 and any improvements which may be CI constructed on Lot 3 from time to time. Powell reserves the right to use the Easement Areas situated in Lot 7, and the Owners of Lots 2 and 3 shall grant the Owner of Lot 7 easements over and across the drainage and wetlands facilities described in Exhibit "D" (the "Lot 2 Easement Area") , and Exhibit "E" (the "Lot 3 Easement Area") as hereinafter provided, all to be used in common with the Grantees to provide wetlands mitigation, storm drainage and storm water retention facilities to serve Lot 7, provided that the following conditions and covenants are satisfied in connec 'on therewith: (i) the proposed use of the Easement Areas -situated in Lot 7 and the Lot 2 and Lot 3 Easement Areas ? (collectively, the "Mastrr Easement Area") and the J1�. wetlands and drainage facilities constructed G) therein by Eastgate and HC, respectively (collectively, the "Drainage Facilities") must be e approved by all governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Drainage Facilities, Horton Dennis & Associates, Inc., or such other engineers as are engaged by the Owner of Lot 7 and approved by Eastgate and HC (the "Engineers") , and a second civil engineering firm doing business in the 7 - FIRST AMENDMENT TO RECIPROCAL EASEMENT AGREEMENT anvwime vlmmcww n3im7.7) r • iiii ..„ Seattle metropolitan area (the "Second Engineers") • selected by the Owners of Lots 2 and 3 and engaged . .. at the expense of the Owner of Lot 7; (ii) the use of the Drainage Facilities by the Owner of Lot 7 • must be implemented in a fashion that will not interfere with the ongoing use and operation of the Drainage Facilities or reduce the capability of the Drainage Facilities to serve Lots 2 and 3; (iii) the Drainage Facilities to be used to serve any portion of Lot 7 situated north of the Driveway Easement Property (the Eastgate ur HC { Drainage Facilities, as the case may be) shall be "''' determined by the Engineers and the Second Engineers; (iv) the Drainage Facilities will not • be used to provide storm water retention and drainage services to the portion of Lot 7 situated south of the Driveway Easement Property (" out Lot 7") ; (v) no use may be made of Lot 7 which involves the manufacture, use or release of • Hazardous Substances other than the operation of a • gasoline service station on South Lot 7 (no • CI • gasoline service station being permitted on North Lot 7) and customary use of cleaning solvents and rl the like in compliance with Environmental Laws (as .-4 used herein, the phrase "Hazardous Substances" T, shall mean all hazardous, toxic, infectious or O radioactive substances, wastes or materials listed, defined or regulated by any Environmental O Law and specifically also shall include petroleum, C.) oil and its fractions, asbestos, urea- Formaldehyde, and polychloribiphenyls; as used herein, the phrase "Fnvironmental Law" shall mean all Federal, state anci. local statutes, regulations and decrees pertaining to the protection of any 1 aspect of human health or the environment that are now or hereafter applicable to the Shopping '' Center) ; (vi) should any of South Lot 7 be used for the purposes of operating a gasoline station, 4 then, in addition to complying with the • requirements of applicable laws, the Owner proposing ..o construct such gasoline station shall . i require that such service station facility be operated by, or licensed by, one of the major oil companies, and shall obtain from the operator of the service station either an indemnity or insurance policy from such cperator for the Hi benefit of the Owners of Lots 2 and 3 (and subject to their advance written approval, which will not be unreasonably withheld) which protects them from •- loss, damage, liability or expense resulting from the operation of such service station facility and any Hazardous Substances which may be released or emanate therefrom; and (vii) the Owner of Lot 7 • shall pay, in advance of its use of the applicable 8 - FIRST AMENDMENT TO RECIPROCAL EASEMENT AGREEMENT iswwI10092v 103)9V14A W631077.71 . ., , ' L _4• li :.b '. ': . .•' w•. 6 • i Drainage Facility, its proportionate share of the • original cost of constructing the per`i'n of the Detention Facility used for outfall purper^b `ased i on its projected use of the Detention Facility. To the extent that any of the obligations of the Owner of Lot 7 set forth in subparagraphs (i) through (vii) above contemplate continuing or ongoing performance, the Owner of Lot 7 shall be obligated to comply with such obligations so long t as it uses the Easement Areas. If the Owner of Lot 7 elects to use the Drainage Facilities, then the Owner of Lot 7 also shall be obligated to construct, at its sole cost and expense, any improvements to or enlargements of the Drainage Facilities required to accommodate its use thereof. All costs of maintaining and repairing the Drainage Facilities other than repair costs resulting from the negligence of an Owner or its - I agents or employees (which shall be paid for solely by such Owner) shall be paid by the Owners a) sharing the use of such Drainage Facilities in proportion to the gross number of square feet of COland owned by each Owner which is served by the 1 r„4 Drainage Facilities. If, as and when the CZ conditions set forth herein are satisfied, the O Owners of Lots 2 and 3, as applicable, shall grant (v easements to the Owner of Lot 7 over and across O the Lot 2 and 3 Easement Areas, consistent in form CD and substance to the grants made in Section 15.10(al and the terms of this section 15.10(b) . 4 (c) Additional Provisions Regarding Lots 4 and 6. To facilitate Powell's use of the Eastgate Drainage Facilities to provide drainage services tc Lots 4 and 6, the su-face drainage system to be installed in Lot 3 will be designed and constructed to accommodate those drainage needs according to the design requirements of the Enginenge designers. Powell and constructionlofraastormnd pay water for the collection system to serve Lots 4 and 6 running from a catch u..sin Situated on Lot 3 to a boundary of Lot 4 or 6, such work to be done simultaneously with the installation of a drainage system on LoontLot Noher benefiteofork Lotsay be 4 andu6d en 3. after completion of the initial drainage system. The bioswale and outfall components of the Eastgate . III O Drainage Facilities shall beiizudtohserve Lots 4 and 6 and Powell shall pay yEastgate incremental cost of increasing the size etofmi such ch by facilities to serve Lots 4 and 6 (as dthe Engineers) as and when such work is completed. Lots 4 and 6 shall be subject to the use 9 - FIRST AMENDMENT TO RECIPROCAL u�zuim»vuAwnlan� EASEMENT AGREEMENTi,i • l• • • • • restrictions .et forth in Section 15. i0(b) (vl and ••' (vi) . 9. Section 15.11 of the Agreement is amended by deleting the square footages of each Lot shown therein for purposes of calculating proportionate shares of the maintenance costs of the Driveway Easement Area, and substituting the following in lieu thereof: 1�:. $QOARE F?017%3E • Lot 1 to be determined* { Lot 2 486,190 Lot 3 535,094 • • Lot 4 35,000 Lot 6 35,000 Lot 7 30,000 • CI *The square footage of Lot 1 for purposes of this provision shall be determined in accordance with Cl the provisions of Section 15. 11• . T, O 10. The first sentence of the second paragraph of • CSection 15.11 is deleted and the following substituted in lieu thereof: CI The Owner of Lot 3 shall construct a private roadway within the Driveway Easement Property in accordance with the requirements of the City of Renton. The Owner of Lot 3 ehall maintain the Driveway Easement Area to a reasonable standard as designated by such Owner in its reasonable • • discretion, and the other Owners shall be obligated to contribute their proportionate share of maintenance costs as set forth herein. 11. The Agreement is amended by addirg the following• provisions thereto: • 15.12. 4„1atei Agreement. Contemporaneously with the • • execution of this Agreement, Eastgate and HC have joined in the execution of a Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions and Grant of Easements and Quit Claim of Certain Parking Easements which is to be filed for record in • the Official Records of King County, Washington (the "yeclaration") . As between the Owner of Lot 2 and the Owner ® of Lot 3, the to n.�s and provisions of the Declaration shall ® supersede and prevail over the terms and provisions of this ._ Agreement to the extent of any conflict or inconsistency between the provisions of the Declaration and the provisions of this Agreement or to the extent that any provisions of the Declaration are more burdensome than the provisions of • 10 - FIRST AMENDMENT TO RECIPROCAL 1 ' S iro)au►uweu�7)EASEMENT AGREEMENT • • • •�•' this Agreement. Lots 1, 4, 6 and 7 are not encumbered by any provision cf the Declaration. 15.13 Expansion of Lot 7 Building Area. The Owner of Lot 7 may develop the portion of Lot 7 lying north cf the Driveway 11.10 jyEasement Property ("North Lot 7") provided that the following covenants and conditions are satisfied: (i) if access to North Lot 7 shall be obtained via the Driveway Easement Property, then the square footage of Lot 7 to be used for purposes of calculating shares of maintenance costs under Section 15,11 shall be modified accordingly; (ii) notwithstanding anything to the contrary ciontained in Gpct;on 2,1 of the Agreement, all parking aryu applicable law to serve any improvements constructed on North Lot 7 shall be contained wholly within North Lot 7 and shall be deemed sufficient if in compliance with applicable law; (iii) the Owner of North Lot 7 shall construct and maintain a fence or other barrier along theof the Easement Areas to prevent the customers and invitees of the Owner of North Lot 7 from crossing or entering upon C) the Master Easement Areas; (iv) in addition to the other uses prohibited by the Agreement, no use may be made of C'7 North Lot 7 which would involve the manufacture, relereleasement se, disposal or use of Hazardous Substances; ( ) any T undertaken upon North Lot 7 shall be completed in compliance C4 with all applicable laws, including (without limitation)t the N requirements of the Army Corps of Engineers; (vi) improvements to be constructed on Lot the Common shall Aexceed LID C) 45 feet in height; and (vii) no part other than the Driveway Easement Property may be used to . provide access to North Lot 7 and the Owner of North Lot 7 hereby quitclaims to the Owners ofo tots ts 2 andt and 3tall they all easements created by ,Section 4.1 encumber Lots 2 and 3. The consent of the Owners of Lots 2 and 3 with respect to development of North Lot 7 set forth herein shall not constitute a waiver of any rights which those Owners may be entitled to assert with respect tc future development of North Lot 7 in their capacities as the owners of adjoining property. l .14 Exchange of Lotc Eastgate and Powell may elect I to exchange the South Pad arba tor Lot_ 6, The Owners of Lots 1 and 2 hereby approve of such exchange and agree that Eastgate and Powell may enter into and consummate an agreement to teat effect without the necessity of obtaining any further consent of the Owners of Lots 1 and 2 with respect thereto provided 1 that any improvements to be constructed upon the South Pad after completion of such exchange shall not not excee P d a fsht In eegenerallthe building c envelope Pad shall be generally in the configuration shown on exhibit "F" attached hereto and any signage erected on the South Pad shall not materially impair the visibility of the HC Building from ground level at the 11 - FIRST AMENDMENT TO youvisiRECIPROCAL �� � EASEMENT AGREEMENT • . .1 ,intersection of South:'est 41st Street and East Valley Highway. If, as and when sach exchange is consum. ited, . the land acquired by Eastgate shall be subjected to the • terms of the Declaration and the land acquired by Powell shall be released from the terms of the Declaration and the Owners shall execute such documents as may be necessary to evidence the foregoing. Notwithstanding such exchange, the lot designations used herein shall be transferred such that the South Pad thereafter shall be referred to as ''Lot 6" pw.poses of this Agreement and the land formerly �•, designated as Lot 6 shall be referred to as part of Lot 3. 15.15 Utility Easement. Powell, as Owner of Lot 7, hereby grants and conveys to the other Owners, for the benefit of the Shopping Center, a perpetual, non- exclusive easement over and across the Driveway • Easement Property for the purpose of installing, C) operating, maintaining and replacing, from time to CO time, storm sewer, sanitary sewer, electrical, gas, rq telephone, cable and other utility lines to serve improvements to be constructed in the Shopping Center. O04 Any work undertaken in .the Driveway Easement Property at the behest of an Owner to install or replace any utility lines shall be done in a good and workmanlike manner at the sole expense of such Owner and in a manner that will not unreasonably interfere with the use of the Driveway Easement Property by the other Owners. 15.16 Pre Restrictitins. Nu purLion of the Shopping Center shall be used for any of the following uses or purposes: a. Any use which would constitute a public or private nuisance. b. Any use which generates noise or sound that is objectionable due to intermittence, beat, frequency, shrillness or loudness (other than noises typically associated "it:, a home improvement store or theatre/cinema) . c. Any use which would gener.te excessive quantity of dust, dirt or fly ash.- d. Any use involving a heightened risk of fire, explrsion or other damaging or dangerous hazard, including the storage, display or sale of explosives or fireworks. e. Any distillation, refining, smelting, agriculture or mining operations. 12 - FIRST AMENDMENT TO RECIPROCAL EASEMENT AGREEMENT montiv ovtvnm) ►mooan7) . #' •I s� •" gyp,. . M .i;. � I• •�! 14 • .• ' , •- f. For the purpose of operating L. mobile home or trailer court, labor camp, junkyard, stock yard .,; ::•tmal raising business. 1 g. Any drilling for and/or removal oL subsurface substances. h. Any dumping of garbage or refuse, other than in enclosed, covered receptacles intended for such purpose. i. Any mortuary or similar service, establishment. j. Any commercial laundry or dry-cleaning plant; provided, however, thisprohibition shall not be applicableabl to any premises if oriented to pick up and delivery by 11. ultimate consumer and there are only nominal on-site supporting facilities. k. Any automobile body and fender repair work. 1. Any flea market, swap meet, "second hand" store or "s•Atplus" store. Gr) adult book store or any so-called "sin" uses n• Any qpornographic Cl including (without limitation) nude dancing, 1,•1 displays, displays of "X-rated" materials or films, massage GC parlor or off-track betting facility. O CD GC 15.17 Additional North Lot 7 Uses. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in Sections 2.1 or 2.3 of GC anything Agreement, North Lot 7 may be used for the purposes of operating a bowling alley, skating rink, health club or bingo parlor or for industrial, warehoue or ig ht manufacturing uses, if permitted by applicable law. No other amendment or modification is made or intended to be made to the Agreement and the Agreement, as modified hereby, shall remain in full force and effect as therein written. II ® - 12A- FIRST AMENDMENT TO RECIPROCALi _ p.wi,oannm»v►��wasoa�.71 EASEMENT AGREEMENT • . : .. ..- . • ...0'., E .. t Executed in multip'.e courterparts to be effective as ofill ; the 8th day of February, 1996. i , POWELL: • Eastga atre, Inc. , n Powell-Orillia Associates, a :reg poration Washington General Partnership By ' Name: y By: Title: Lloyd W. Powell, General Partner tic: HCWA Realty Corp. , a Washington By: 111 corporation Peter W. Powell, General Partner p, POWELL CI By: C') Name: Title: ..-- ..-I Peter W. Powell LC Omm L. POWELL O By: rj:3 Name: Cl Title: Lloyd W. Powell EXHIBITS: "A" - HC Easement "B" - Eaatgate Easement "C" - Powell Easement • "D" - Lot 2 Easement Area "E" - Lot 3 Easement Area • "F" - South Pad Envelope STATE OF OREGON ) ss. - County of WP(.40,11 -) This instrument was ack ow ed•e• before me thi= day • of , 1996, by I.. ' . . as . . :I:i''.i , • of Eas gate Theatre, Inc. , an 0 -g• •, p• ti• n,/ llirlf of -- the corpora ion. cn�:.4 JACY.!E WILKES �Iri�i • �'-.'±+�� c.-.r r- i `- �,':a1.'do c:• MyT:.mmission ExpirreeGON c� -- •• 13 - FIRST AMENDMENT TO RECIPROCA .ti i EASEMENT AGREEMENT m`"'1107/2511m3.43i^M 634O 7.6) Execu in multiple counterpartsto ba eff.:=•.---' as of the day of G 6. PAIcTc:ATE'• EastgeteTheatre, Inc., an Powell-orillia AS$OCiates, a Washington General i Oregon corporation Partnership By: By: -------------- Title-:----______-------------- General \ . Time: Lloyd W. Powell, Partner HCWA Realty Corp. , a Washington By: peter W. Powell, General corporation Partner t r By: i. , [Ct Name: Tills' peter W. Powell CI _ le POWELL C) Cl By: r4 Ness: • X Title U well 0 O Lloyd W. Po CD "A" - HC Easement "Jr - Eastgate Easement 01 mc0 - Powell Easement -1 „D■ - Lot 2 Easement Area :,I "Ew - Lot 3 Easement Area i, .T. - South Pad Envelope ' STATE OF OREGON ) es . - County of This instrument was ackno.ledged before me this _ day of --� atre, Inc., ll oa a a o of Eastgate Theatre, In an Oregon corporation, the corporation. III es NOTARY PUBLIC TOR OREGON My Commission Expires: 13 - FIRST AMENDMENT TO RECIPROCAL a,.,, n$ms9vw►�eru•m7st EASEMENT AGREV A • 1 . E - • /I • . Executed in mu'.tiple counterparts to be effective as of . the 8th day of February, 1996. LASTGATE: POWE2.T4 Eastgate Theatre, Inc., an Powell-Orillia Associates, a • Oregon corporation Washington General Partne hip • Title: -- -- BY: /fyyy ) l\ • L1oy�b W, Powal�l, General Par IX: '` HCWA Realty Corp., a Washington By: j corporation Pater W. Powell, General Partner Iby: L POW= ! Cr: Name: C? Title:Ct - - - - - Peter W. Powell 1-4 --' CD By:O Name: r, • Title. - //��i �, (� \ ., 1 Lloyd W. owell EXHIBITS: u "A" - HC Easement "B" - Eastgate Easement • "C" - Powell Easement "O" - Lot 2 Easement Area "E" - Lot 3 Easement Area "F" - South Pad Envelope STATE OF OREGON ) - County of ) as. 1 This instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 1996, by of Eastgate Theatre, Inc., an Oregon corperation, on behalf of the corporation. NOTARY PUBLIC FOR OREGON My Commission Expires: 13 - FIRST AMENDMENT TO RECIPROCAL EASEMENT AGREEMENT • • � ;ram• . �!•r •,.�.v . • . . . t _ �...-. FIEg-Q7-'% 16:07 ID:5C}1.K1HE-W 1 LL 1 p•601J T . h0:503-796-2DH0 f}413 P13 Executed in multiple counterparts to be effect.;;" .s of the 8th day of February, 1996. MA12A1II: !WELL: Eastgate Theatre, Inc., an Powell-Orillia Associates, a Oregon corporation •Washington General Partnership • By: • Wane: By: _ Title: Lloyd W. Powell, General Part .1V BC: HCWA Realty Corp., a Washington By: Corporation Po or W. Powell, General • Partner By: Name: CI Title: CI 'P 1• . Powell Cl By: CD Name:CD Title: CD Lloyd W. Powell CD C) ZXNIBITS: "A" - BC Easement "B" - Eastgate Easement, "C" - Powell Easement "p" - Lot 2 Easement Area "E" - Lot 3 Easement Area "P" - South Pad Envelope STATE OF ORLGON ) ) es. County of ) This instrument was acknowledged before no this _ day of , 1996, by , as of Eastgate Theatre, Inc.: an Oregon corporation, on behalf of No the corporation. NOTARY PUBLIC FOR OREGON My Cocmissio; Expires: 13 - FIRST AMENDMENT TO RECIPROCAL EASEMENT AGREEMENT eimumwmaumaeammamm • • i ;' •I �I 1 . .. y N . ... i .- - , CO$}[OUWFALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS ) sg COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX / a On , before me, a ear or ea d state, persona ly pp r �� Notary puDlio In S er personally known to me (or p ,W�+ Edward J.as aevidunca', to b.' t:a uereoT.Y, • O. to pe on the s o pa s theory ...... , ' _ whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and his/her/ r �Nl i J.:. •. acknowledged to me that he/she the same nithe r `` w and that by tlil c a authorised capacity, upon behalf of whit d` _ x instrument, the person, or the entity ,, executed the instrument. �� • person acted, �X •.., u►%.•`r hand and official seal. •. . •. wITtaESS my , • • JypubltTh ° said States rlCOMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS ) as. CD COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX ) 4 CV , a Notary CD On F b, before me, CD x s hate, personally appears Cl Publicaiuuiuri• IIK personally known to m (or proved •� ffii��ll � r person � to me on the bas s o sa s theory evidence) to be the whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and p••\`EY _- acknowledged pthandat hthat bye/she xhis/herecuted tsignature nile same in ith.�P authorised capacity, behalf of whi the `,�`� , • instrument, the parson, or the entity upone: executed the instrument. '+ parson acted, °' tLi ��- i: a WITNESS my hand and official seal. • . • �, ,_.. Notary Public in an for s id Std.,. CA' • ' M/C.0.,.....,.., Lnd....,... �J. I S_7 'mow 14 - FIRST AMENDMEN" 'O RECIPROCAL ptwnr0urtf,�amM, ,A EASEMENT AGREEMENT • STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) es. • County of ) On this day of , 1996, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public-in and for tne State Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared Peter known to be the person who executed this instrument in his individual capacity and as General Partner of Powell-Orillia • Associates, a Washington general partnership, the partnership that executed the foregoing instrument, aid acknowledged the instrument to be his voluntary act anddeedr voluntary t and of thatpartnershipfortheeuseseandd purposes therein mentioned, and on oath s':ated that he was authorized to execute the instrument on behalf of the partnership. WITNESS my hand ar.d official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above written. C) C) NOTARY PUBLiC in and for the State C7 1-4of Washington, residing at U; My Commission Expires: O fV O STATE OF ARIZONA ) es. county of Mt/=c cAP-) On this •2 day of ---Idi 2 f.4 tX 1:96, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public In and fddtt the State of Arizona, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared Lloyd W. Powell, known to be the person who executed this instrument in his • individual capacity and as General Partner of Powell-Oril1ia Associates, a Washington general partnership, the partnership that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the instrument to be his free and voluntary act and the free and voluntary act and deed of the partnership for the uses and 6. purposes therein mentioned, eau on oath stated that ho was authorized to execute the instrument on behalf of the partnership. • WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above written. _ e -_ 1,.2- ,,?. ir el e*-it . , '�="'� ► NOTARY/ PUBLIC in and for the State „....N.,,..,.�..• - ' of Ar :one, residing at , -, p My Commission Expires: edt ,' /`/ / / 15 - FIRST AMENDMENT TO RECIPROCAL EASEMENT AGREEMENT wen,puma,1 coywhu H oarn or - , - 1 , . . iii ._ _. I� 4 ft1'3P15 y . • • FFJ 97-•So :5:0b I D:jQ.JRI E-W I LL I ft1SCN TEL PD:503-796-2900 f 1 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) • ) ss. County of ) On�thi7s�_l_ day of �dec �,-—, 1996, before me, the • • undersigned, a Notary Public in and stir the State PofeWars. Pgto , duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared known to be the person who executed this instrument in his • a 1 individual capacity and as General Partner of the.11 Orilliip Aasor' __..s, a Washington general partnership, ne the that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledgedand 1 �~• voluntary instrument to be fre ryact n his free ddeedof thatvoluntary partnershiptfordth euseseand th e aautthorized toeexecutoin ithedinatrument and on aon behalf ofathe was partnership. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above written. Cl NOTARY MIX i yATfOf�MW�,,►,���1�� N ARY PUBLCC in and for the S ate• n �..� At 10.1991 of Washington, residing at [ �/ CMy Commission Expires: •/ • STATE OF ARIZONA ) ) as. Cl • County of ) 1996, before me, the • on this day of , undersigned, a Notary Public In and for the State of Arizona, duly commisaionsd and sworn, personally appeared Lloyd W. Powell, • known to be the person who executed this .l..strumeat in his individual capacity and as General Partner of Powell-Orillia Associates, a Washington general partnership, the partnership that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowl.Jged the • instrument to be his free and voluntary act and the free and voluntary act and d nd of that partnership for the uses and purposes therein sentioned, and on oath stated that he was •• authorized to execute the instrument on btthali of the ' partnership. _ WITNESS my band and official sail hereto affixed the • day and year first above written. • NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State • of Arizona, residing at My Commies/cm Expires: . 15 - FIRST AMENDMENT TO RECIPROCAL EASEMENT AGREEMENT wienmmemememaemedema •I •. .. 4` - . it- •Ft . t. •h�.l�S!a a w I .Ir'.� .4."'A��. -' 1{� , ,.ram a ry. . 'T'�:. 4 e f .. , \, • • . _ I 02/06/1996 16:57 2068228758 H D A 'PAGE 02 Horton Dennis&Associates,Inc. , HDA Consulting Engin in,Planners&Surveyors EXHIBIT"A" -BC EASEMENT THAT PORTION OF LOT 7, BURLINGTON NORTHERN BINDING SITE PLANIROUGH (BSP-014-92).PER MAP RECORDED IN VOLUME 161 OF PLATS, 11 INCLUSIVE, UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 9206302696, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY,WASHINN MORE PAR CUSLARLY UF�SCRIBED ASTOWNSHIP FOLLC?W7S.'H, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., BEING BEGINNING AT LONG THE NORTHEASTOF D LOT 70.00 FE7; THENCE NORTH ET; THENCE SOUTH 87°50'47' WEST A glik 01'50'09' WEST PARALLEL WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 7 A DISTANCE OF c•.I I 553.6E FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88'09'51' EAST 70.00 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 7; THENCE NORTH 01'50'09' EAST ALONG SAID LINE 553.30 FEET TO O✓ 1 HE POINT OF BEGINNING. Q CONTAINING 3E,744 SQ. FT. MORE OR LESS. cD (7) ... U. . „... I , - _____it 20 Sscorl�Aroma South, �r1�J, Washington-98033, Phone (20d) 822-2525, Fx (206) d22-d7S1 • W/ • swira •..♦.. !bru/�^'A:ZI:�':nWka:.r. i``/c�. • Fijimmisragigem ■ ' • 82/06/19"S 161s'• 2d66220750 H D A PAGE 03 Norton Dennis&AYSOcI4teS,Inc. HDA Cry- .-.ng Engineers,Planners&Surveyors EXHIBIT "B" -EASTGATE rAE NIENT THAT POP .1ON OF LOT 7, BURLINGTON NORTHERN BINDING SITE PLAN (BSP-014-"1), PER MAP RECORDED IN VOLUME 161 OF PLATS, PAGES 8 THROUGH ! 11 INCL►.SIVE, UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 9206302696. RECORDS OF KING r COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SITUATE IN SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE I 5 EAST, `'• M., BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: ICOMMEVCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 7; THENCE SOUTH I 01°50'09' 'WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE THEREOF 553.30 FEET TO THE POINT OF c-) ! BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID EAST LINE SOUTH 01'50'09' c') ! WEST 162.63 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID LINE SOUTH 28'33'51' I WEST 155.64 FEET; THENCE NORTH 01'50'09' EAST 301.64 FEET: THENCE SOUTH • 88'09'51' EAST 70.00 TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. • O • O CONTAINING 16,249 SQ. FT. MORE OR LESS. CD • o. r‘ - • 011 uro Sag= Wiwi/7 • • 20 Second A►eniie Sorts, Kirkland Washington Q033, Phone (206) 821-2525, Farr ( 06) 822•8758 . . .� ( JWlasd • Maset-Ase • tardrs r t71�4S • .,�rfw .a►•1�..r L`! • .r` • ••es- • od.♦ , •F `-: ' �. •-• • a ` PAGE 04 02/06/1996 16:57 2068220756 H D A Horton Dennis&Associates,Inc. HDA Consulting Engineers,Planners&Surveyors EXHIBIT "C"-POWELL EASEMENT • THAT PORTION OF LOT 3, CITY OF RENTON LOT LINE UNDER RECORDING NUNT MBER RECORDED IN VOLUME 106 OF SURVEYS,PAGE 180, 9511299006, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON, SITUATE IN SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W•M•. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 3; THENCE SOUTH 88'09'51'EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE THEREOF 113.15 FEET; THENCE SOUTH C)► 01'50'09'WEST 426.54 FEEP; THENCE NORTH 89°05'25"WEST 211.54 FEET TO THE cl► WEST LINE OF SAID LOT; THENCE ALONG SAID WEST LINE NORTH 01°50'09' ,' EAST 71.99 FEET; THENCE NORTH 28'33'51'EAST CONTINUING ALONG SAID LINE ;L' 218.70F ;T HEN POINTENORTH OF BEGINNING.9' EAST CONTINUING ALONG SAID LINE 162.63 FEET CONTAINING 64,976 SQ. FT. MORE OR LESS. iter"fir,„,• ' u,i� emsO erlei 4 I . - 20i 1 Second Avenue South, Kirkland, Washington 98033, P (206) 832.2525, Far (206) 822-8758 ifigirs/ • Ws.rrdbr • Dairs '+�I. 1. t ....iiiiiiir k _ .. . r J�/06/1 lo::? 2008220750 H D A PAGE 05 i Horton Denus&Associates,Inc. HDA Consulting Engineers,Planners&Surveyors ` EXHIBIT"D" -LOT 2 EASEbffNTJEA \ THAT PORTION OF LOT 2, CITY OF RENTO80.UNDER RECORDING NUMBER LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 106 OF SURVEYS, PAGEI 9511299006, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, SWASHINGTON, SITUATE SECTION I TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE5 E . W.M., BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNIN G AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 2; THENCE SOINNING UTH I 87'50'47'EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE THEREOF 83.38 FEET TO THE C) I OF A CURVE,CONCAVE TO THE NORTHWEST,HAVING A RADIUS OF 605.87 FEET; I THENCE IN AN EASTERLY DIRECTION ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, PASSING rl I THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 02°48'55' A DISTANCE OF 29.77 FEET; THENCE 'T, ' p SOUTH 01'50'09'WEST 553.40 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 2; THENCE 0 I NORTH 88'09'51' WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE 113.15 FEET TO THE WEST LINE p I OF SAID LOT; THENCE NORTH 01'50'09' EAST ALONG SAID WEST LINE 553.30 c.+0 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CI CONTAINING 62.577 SQ. FT. MORE OR LESS. 4".4il. . M .-- - 1717111) eissir _ . WOOFS • 20 Second Avenue South, Kirkland, Washinvton 98033, Phone (206) 822-2525, Fax (206) 822-8758 Crilli l • Mr i 4 • Amity . _ .. ..„r--- 7•(.g!'.•V71:1-0 a ,4..aj.i• • • • .� .. '" i ft 02/.06/1996 16:57 2068220758 H D A PAGE 06 \ . Horton Dennis&Associates,Inc. HDA Consulting Engineers,Planners&Surveyors IEXHIBIT"E" -LOT 3 EASEMENT AREA ' ITHAT PORTION OF LOT 3, CITY OF RENTON LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT AS ' RECORDED IN VOLUME 106 OF SURVEYS,PAGE 180,UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 9511299006, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY.WASHINGTON,SITUATE IN SECTION 30, ' TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 3; THENCE SOUTH p) ' 88°09'51" EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE THEREOF 113.15 FEET; THENCE SOUTH C' ' 01'50'09'WEST 426.54 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°05'25'WEST 211.54 FEET TO THE ' WEST LINE OF SAID LOT; THENCE ALONG SAID WEST LINE NORTH 01'50'09' x ' EAST 71.99 FEET; THENCE NORTH 28'33'51'EAST CONTINUING ALONG SAID LINE N . 0 FEET; THENCE NORTH FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.EAST CONTINUING ALONG SAID LINE O I 162.63 CO CONTAINING 64,976 SQ. FT. MORE OR LESS. • • ` •f .\tit L uagO • / a/s/irl _ II e 0 Second Avenue South, Jantlend, Washington 98033, Phone (?o6) 822-2525, Far (206) 822-8758 • Wenatchee • Avian :e;: f I . . I • .. .. 1 lJ1 p ..•. iia= 3= (ram—+- _l iI'.•,.' " is •...:, \ I — __— .:.. N0150'12'E - 20.00' — — �' W . .•• Ar ,= ..:. :: : :1= I zTillill iii iiii ' Z � - • •Ill = Bt ? cc 1\ E.1 .. T . .. . a..2..: elf it, . .7 `' Gv7<G'31 ..J $ - v No130'12� - 210.00' z —� a = a r .! rf = N et1 N01-50'12'E - 210.00' — — c = o - = r 0 VI N6817'07'W - 1L.66' .o t — — .• 4 = N q .1 CI) i 1 C - - lil a L�4•n�"f �� + I - . N ° $ z /401'50'04'E - 210.00. z "., "VW'owns rw _ y%�•- II. 1 g - . - - neon a..aar.. I H v If J I I _ — p- — 's. L 1 e, _ • P �4•IesRE , ,_, ___, vl I E 1 4 1 C .44/::•-. ' I i,.,„ _, 4 1 . ,,,....._,......._ . fla II(ll(Ill(111111(lifl(Illlflll(ll(lilllllll� :: ids 1111111 EL... . . 'E\--N66'49'43 - 39.11' N013o'09'E - 768.04' - - - - - -- �yrfit b+t' F GCCIS0Z09G EAST VALLEY H I G H W , ,•q • , . I I - t i .AFTER.RECORDING RETURN TO PETER POGIELt o 737 MARKET ST KIRKLAND, A. 98033 EASES AGREEMENT This Easement Agreement ("Agreement") is made on this 1 q day w , and between PORELL-ORILLIA IS�IATES, a ¶ r� of March, 1996 by "Grantor" and T71RWE8T STEEL ; '' Washington general partnership (" Grantor") CORPORATION, an OM - corporation ("Grantee") • Grantor and :.- Grantee agree to all of the following terms and conditions, o including the recitals. I SSCTIOX 12 REGIT r • 1.1 Grantor owns that certain real property (the "Servient ', 1 -- Estate") described as follows: - .' • Lot 7, Burlington Northern, a binding site plan, .; according to City of Renton Binding Site Plan recorded June 30, 1992 in Volume 161 of Plats, Pages 8 through 11, j` :, y inclusive, under_King County Recording No. 9206302696. •i "Dominant • 1.2 Grantee owns that certain real property (the cl described as follows: r') Estate") (` 5 Lot B, Burlington Northern, a binding site plan, according to City of Renton Binding Site Plan recorded : wr,. June 30, 1992 in Volume 161 of Plats, Pages 8 through 11, � . . L� inclusive, under Ring County Recording No. 9206302696; ,0::; and parcel A of Short Plat No. 378-79, according to the short ;!.... plat recorded under King County Recording No. 7909249001. .,•7.':,: l•�i' 1.3 Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a description of what '�' “ shall hereinafter be referred to as the "Easement Property". The :•�,; ,•', rt is a portion of the Servient Estate. Attached +r •t�.- he Easement Property - *��. ihchibit A-1 is a drawing showing the Easement Property ..: �'.. hereto as — with crosshatching. - . 1.4 Grantee wishes to have access over and certain utility ;�' ,?�?• 2. rights under the Easement Property. Grantor is willing to grant •.:2-•,?r such rights to G; •.ntee on the terms and conditions contained in i7e ;';;t.„" this Agreement. ,:• aECTION 2 a ORP!r Ot E71RV)I� '` -. J 2.1 Subject to the other terms and conditions outlined in - this Agreement, Grantor hereby grants to Grantee a non-exclusive . ._.. easement over and under the Easement Property for purposes of (1) r ' pedestrian and/ obtaining or vehicular ingress to and egress from the Dominant EState and (2) ,S;;to time installing and • i • `;• .' from time maintaining in the subsurface of the Easement Property storm sewer, - •:.`, • .,,,4: ;.:'•1- FILED FOR RECORD AT REOUENJ*014 °: ' UFaom+Esr �CES ;;}(NOT RLCU�3EAnoN TITLE INSURANCEco. ' • N..Kcng cc..Rscada Mimeo 320 10STH AVE NE %-f• PO.BOX 1493 DI_. L )L1- .4 BELLEVUE.WA 98009 , : [ j • 1.C -,.- . — y . %„;, sanitarysewer, electrical, gas, telephone, cable and other utility systems serving the Dominant Estate. Such easement rights shall '.:i hereinafter be collectively referred to as the "Easements". 2.2 Grantor represents and warrants that Grantor is the owner • of the Servient Estate and has the right ogrant the Easements, • • and that, subject to the terms of this Agreement, e right to quietly enjoy the Easements. • 3at":=::.1. 3: DURATIOn .Q7_ The Easements granted in this Agreement shall be perpetual in • duration. SECTION 4: CONSTRUCTION OF ROAD 4.1 In consideration for the above grant of the Easements, Grantee hereby agrees that it will commence on or before that day which is ninety (90) days after receipt of the requisite whichever buildin s ilding permit(s) or removal of the required surcharge, and complete (subject to force majeure delays beyond Grantee's • reasonable control) on or before that dato which is one (1) year after the commencement date, at Grantee's soletexcend , the eoroad oad improvements depicted on Exhibit B, incorporated herein by this reference (such road improvement Pork • `1 shall hereinafter be referred to as the "Road Work") . Grantee ,L shall pursue diligently and in good faith the requisite permit(s) ' and the commencement and completion of the required surcharge work • 7 so as to yield a commencement date for the Road Work that is as - close to the date of this Agreement as is reasonably possible. • d , Grantee shall cause the Road Work to be completed raid manner, in accordance with all applicable laws T regulations and without undue delay once the Road Work has commenced. In addition, Grantee agrees to keep the Servient Estate • free of any liens arising out of or related to the Road Work, and if a lien is nonetheless filed against the Servient Estate arising • out of or relating to the Road Work, Grantee ag..eea to p.'omptl:' post a bond at Grantee's expense in accordance with the terms of RCW 60.04.141, as the same may be amended, so as to release the • Servient Estate 'rom such lien. Before signing any construction contracts--for all or any portion of the Road Work, Grantee shall submit the name of the proposed contractor or contractors to • Grantor, together with copies of the proposed construction review' and approval schedule(s) ,of Grantor,of which approval slhal l the not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. 4.2 HCWA Realty Corp, a Washington corporation ("HCWA") is -- • the current owner of Lot 2, Burlington Northern,e Pan r binding site plan, according to City of Renton Binding 30, 1992 in Volume 161 of Plats, Pages 8 through 11, inclusive, _2_ euoet� • T3661C53:3/2E/ob 5UCJ./P01ELL/fAR1#4T , • . { 2 under King County Recording No. 9206302696. A port'.nn tonfdtherroad d described in Exhibit—It will cross over an existing storm water retention outfall pipe installed by HCWA. Grantee and Grantor hereby jointly and severally agree to indemnify in and hd HCWA and its successors, assigns, agents, employees liabivittolees harmless from and against any and all claims, damages, losses and expenses (including attorneys/neys' s oiincurred r any way with or without litigation or on appeal) arising out related to any damage to or interference with the functioning such pipe caused by the Road Work, use of the road or any utility installation or maintenance work undertaken by on or on behalf of Grantee or Grantor. Grantor and Grantee hereby agree that HCWA has y d that HCWA may given osuficint n f thise indemnity consideration though for t it s nissmnnot n a party to this Agreement. BBCTIOM S t 21T1'.IZ'IE8 5.1 Except as provided in Section 5.2, any utilities installed under the Easement Property for the benefit of the Dominant Estate shall be installed at the sole expense of Grantee and shall be maintained ins a course, Grantor elects to condition at the eiexpelse of aof Grantee. Similarly,ndr of above) the Easement Property, such shall be stalle under (orgood condition at Grantor's sole ;,7 installedse. andi maintained i a g installation or repair C: expense. Prior to commencing any utility t JD work and prior to Grantor connecting to any utiliwi system thin } gri installed by Grantee pursuant to Section 5.2, the party 4 to cCI v perform the installation, repair ora connection work (hereinafter 2 referred to as the ',Working Party ) shall (1) provide uD party with a written description of the work' in question T (including, but not limited to, information regardingga time location/layout, sizing and invert) , as well as the proposed reasonableim frames within which the work will be done and (2) good faith efforts to accommodate reasonable timing 1 agree visiono ns proposed by the other party (the Working Party conduct the work in question after normal business hours if the work will materially interfere with either access or alle provision of utility services to the other party's parcel) . an the Working Party shall (1) take reasonable steps to mini izeston any disruption to the .:;:her party caused by the work in qu in d(2) complete the work in a good and workmanlike .maw eroveand in accordance with all applicable laws and regul ovens to Grantee is the Working Party, Grantee shall not loll anyr hensted to be filed against the Servient Estate arising out the work in question, and if such a lien is nonetheless Grantes fills against the Servient Estate, Grantee shall, expense, post a bond in accordance with the terms of RCW 60.04.161 • so as to remove the lien from the Servient Estate. If the utility work in question will damage any of the RoadlWrk improvements, the work the Working Party shall, promptly after completion oin 1366/053:3/28196 .y rAsON rt pry, /pfL1/FAII EST :51 . .. . r. d °II _ :ril . _ _ question and at the Working Party's sole expense, repai r and priorcto thhe Road commencement of the work inents to hque tion on they were in P 5.2 Grantor, at Grantor's expense, shall at all times be entitled to tap into or otherwise connect to any utility system installed by Grantee or for the benefit of the Dominant Estate state III without paying any latecomer's charge, -upntor does not ureimbursement payment, provided that (1) over the utility system in question c:r material:, diminish • its service to Grantee and (2) any maintenance expenses incurred in connection withany utility yeishall ctelit between Grantor and Grante inpoportiontothrrespeivamountsof •• usage of the system in question (however, if the maintenance woo is required due to the negligence or intentional misconduct the 73 either party, that party shall bear all repair expensesond maintenance is required at a point in the utility line in questionnot 8 that no longer serves one of the parties, the party erved shall not be required to participate in the repair or maintenance expenses) . Moreover, Grantor shall be entitled to require Grantee • to increase the capacity of one, some or all of the utility systems .t being installed by Grantee to accommodate Grantor's use, p rothat (a) Grantor pays for all additional expenses relating to such oversizing and (b) Grantor advises Grantee of its election to oversize a given utility system prior to the commencement by Grantee of the installation of such system (in other words, once cl O the system has been installed, Grantor shall no longer have the right to require oversizing) . s VECTION 6: MAINTENANCE Of ROAD WORE IMPROVEMENTS 6.1 The Road Work improvements shall be maintained by the . • parties in a good, safe, clean and presentable condition and all • costs incurred in such maintenance shall be split between the parties on a pro rata basis based on the rati° of he to t°the total tal floor area in all buildings located on a party parcel floor area in all buildings located on bcth the Dominant Estets and the Servient Estate. Until such time as a building is located on the Servient Estate, Grantee, at Grantee's expense, shall have the • • right to undertake, say required maintenance work without any notice . toSe or consent f►ei Ger . shall a building havetha rights located on the to undertake any Servient Estate, either party shall do so without first required maintenance wory, but hee workfin question, the proposed advising the other party timing for such work, the proposed contractor or contractors who will perform the work and the estimated cost thereof. If the other party reasonably objects to the proposed timing, cost (including • allocation thereof -- sc_e Section 6.2 below) or contctor parties or rhtle 0 need for the maintenance work in question, endeavor in good faith to settle their differences before the work is commenced, and if they are unable to do so, they will implement • cn:cmrTc 13M/053:3/2S/% �. pNUU/PO EII/f J EST ti below in section 6.: to I procedure described If the thee arbitration P in question is reasonable. shah,. determine whether the objectionobjection is reasonable, i. may ro riate order under the circumstances ;:e.g., it change in Arbitrator determines that the commencement of the work, enter the appropriate delay in the coam tf the pursuant, a to then ordern contractor, bidding, disproportionate sharing order that ® work tertractor, etc., or it may terms of section 6.2 below, need not be done at all). the foregoing, however, any maintenance of 6.2 NotwithstandingnegligenCe or intentional misconduct ofshall work required by , to ees, tenants. agents or invitees, party, or a party sb�uch party• be paid for solely y accordance with done in 6.3 With regard to maintenance work instigating party swath thein terms the otherons 5.2 or 6.1 for itl share of the cost of such work work within eighty party s after completion of such (180) day shall be and, if one hundred beg noiced is Grantor, such invoices contractor who and, the party shallo washa rrespons byl a forfu thel e woken in question.n. The invoiced party z y itsspproirat work in of the st in question within fifteen!(15)the 1 x pay pro rhea nstigating p rty c mplies with the terms fails to r+ immediatelys after the instigating If the invoicedth a in question =� Preceding period, rate of C, make suet payment within such 15 day Seattle First cn O shall begin to accde interest at the rate sion the prime charged at the time in ( by per annul, from interest aMain Branch, plus five percenta ant. Inm National Bank, period through the date of ipayment. party, the end of such uch c 15 laim y r reimbursement by shall be a secured addition, any above-described interest, recordation of togetheria with shathe ll attach and take effect upon in the right and a lien claim of lien by the invoicing partyi the below-describedde Recorder's Office. The claim of lien shall include the fRing County (i) the name of the claimant;(i(i))the last statementknown concerning the basis of the claim of the lien:owner of the parcel noncerningreputed agai name and address of the owner or a description of the real (v) a descriptionn of property wagainse�ich i e claimed; (iv)laimed; rise the the woe agperformedainst or payment made which has given to e the work a statement itemizing the amplrt nt th of lien hereunder andr of this thereof; and this a statement that thet a reecordationm o shallths Age terms of thisclaimof Agreement reciting acknowledged thereof has been serves.: upon the Agreement. The of lien shall be duly service contain a certificate that a copy either by personal owner against whom the lien is claimed, to such owner by certified mail sent from King or • Co by mailingin n. The lien so claimed shall attach andfro from date o reY, Washingto claimed thereby of recordation solely a the amountwhich power is hereby enforced by suit, under power of sale other manner allowed by li granted) , judicial foreclosure or in any zummTc _S. moDwookudran "11112111111111111F - I { V 1. . t law for the foreclosure of liens. Any exercise of the pow er of :4- sale or foreclosure shall be conducted in accordance with the e1laws s of the State of Washington applicable to and exercise of pow. of sale in or foreclosures of mortg gd f the trustee. I • appropriate, the invoicing party is hereby appointed for purposes of exercising such power of sale, with full right of • substitution. Notwithstanding the foregoing, such liens shallibe l be subordinate to any mortgage or deed of trust given ingod fai h and for value now or hereafter encumbering the property trlIrt was recordedb tr the lien, provided such mortgage or deed of • prior to the recording of the lien, and any purchaser at any foreclosure or trustee's sale (as well as any grantee by deed in lieu of foreclosure or trustee's sale) under any prior mortgage or d ear from any such then existing of trust shall take buerwise subjectetonthelprovisions of lien, t h this Agreement. 6.4 If the parties are unable to resolve their differences as shall be issue resolvedaris resolvedg by out singlecarbit dispute rator arbitration before the ,n American Arbitration Association under thel Commercial rom date Arbitration Rules modified as follows: (i) m of0 demand days; for arbitration to final award shall not exceed thirty (30) Y ri n (ii) the Arbitrator shall be chosen by the American Arbitration c Association without submittal of lists and subject to ll enge only for good cause shown; (iii) all notices mayF be by .z other electronic communication with later confirmation in writing; C) (iv) the time, date and place of the hearing id shall be there set yhall thic Arbitrator in his or her sole discretion, pn vbe at least five (5) days prior notice of the hearing; (v) there shall be no post-hearing briefs; (vi) there shall be no disco"•ery except by order of the Arbitrator; end (vii) the e Arbitrator enall issue his or her award within aeveul daysclothe of the modified be hearing. Any of the above provisions may be stipulation of the parties. The decision of the Arbitrator shall be final and non-appealable and enforceable in any couir of competent jurisdiction. The parties hereby release the Arbitrator from any and all claims or possi.ile claims against the ?sbitrltor based on the decision of the Arbitrator. The prevailing party in the proceeding shall be ..warded reasonable attorneys' fees, expert and non-expe:-41 witness costs and expenses, and other costs and expenses irourred in connection with the arbitration, unless the Arbitrator for good cause determines otherwise. The costs and fees of the Arbitrator shall be born= by the non-prevailing party, unless the Arbitrator for good cause determines otherwise. SECTION 7: CROSS-INDEMNITY Each party to this Agreement hereby agrees to indemnify and __ ® hold the other art harmless from and against any and all claims, party damages, liabilities and expenses (including attorneys' fees incurred with or without litigation or on appeal) arising out of or • . 1366/053:3/26/% -a- tau uwrau wF ST related to the use of the Easement • property by the in any way its employees, tenants, agents or invitees. es, ;.la2.Ilitiss indemnifying party, foregoing, if the claims, daasg il es Notwithstanding are caused by the concurrent negligenceeach expenses so arising agents or invitees, cf and par their employees, tenants, to the extent of the both pantie, the other only enter, tenants, indemnifying shall arty'indem own negligence or that of its agents, tuna and enplmneeyinr party foregoing indemnity is spa empresses or invitees. The expressly intended to constitute a waiver c�88 extent necessary to unity complete indemnity for the under the indemnified party withRaW, to the extent of provide the party's employees, negligence of the indemnifying the subject of specific negotiation theirw negligence. the joint and several between the parties. Notwithstanding liability language vis a vis HCWA, as outlined in Section 4.2 anyclaims made by HCWA under the Section 4.2 indemnity shove, between Grantor and Grantee in accordance with ; shall be allocated i the terms of this Section 7. 1 n ee3ov1TioM OZ_BZ4na C: BBCTTODi e i reserves the right to use the Easement Property x, . .1 Grantor hereby the right to construct improvements CI however it wishes (including struc such use does -.. on,ounder and above the Easement interfere provided Grantor hereby unreasonably interfere with Grantee's above- nrt materially Easements. In addition, not granted rights under the reserves all other rights in and to the Easement Property anted to Grantee herein. i specifically granted { All of the terms and conditions of this Agreement bs binding hall run with the land and shall inure to the benefit of, assigns, personal representatives and upon, the the parties h reto, including without limitation all subsequenth ue of owners Dominant and Servient Estates and all prsl ownersthro through eounder them. . persons claiming to this Agreement consults an attorney in 1�.1 If enforce party Agreement, the prevailing order to erforco- y �' : the terms of this 1►4r the non-prevailing party shall be entitled to reimbursement a cnable costs and attorneys' party of the prevailing party fees are incurred wi..h or fees, whether such costs and attorneys' inconsistent with without litigation or on appeal (to the extent over ith the terms of Section 6.4 shall governddescribed in ther foregointh g, regard to the arbitration procedure foregoing Section 6.4) . EllfBelT4 -a- iixrAm+esT i 1. .� - G• , PX3g-4.7Ilk ---- .2 L - • I0.2 This Agreement constitutes the entire3 parties with s•,� pi oni any °p ct o o the E?sement Property. Neitherernp of other partr written PertY• the other or the principals, agents,representation made Party is III Agreement.partyless This repan employeess expressed inaffiliates the the this nts between Agreement supersedesesressed in writing in Phis Agreement may be mends pertaining t the Easementprior written Parties, amended only by a writing ed Property.y both 10.3 No claim of waiver, to any provision , consent or acquiescence withins respect party and in writing.Party has expressly made against eith or acquiescence g'noIn such latter event, consented or acquishall apply to anywaiver 10.4 This future action or inactiont between and input is the result o bet Conseenqu an put from both parties ! substantial n cv `� the lair Y� this Agreements and their respective intent o! the language be construedpective counsel. not f and or or against guage contained in accordance with .y mechanical function any Party, regardless herein as a whole n of drafting th Agreement. 10.5 who performed the 10.5 I! either party 1 party may o all rights under this Agreement Both equity,exercise anynrights and remedies •e at law i part partiesy acknowledge the right to sue for specific available law Y have available to and agree that it isnecessary ry that for specificit as necessa performance. remediesperformance, a potential remedy the i' that each each However, before exercising any rights to suer the parts shall give the other io and default (5) business days prty written ghts or and thirty (30) days to cure a non-monetary to cure a monetary of default cannot moneta rY default cure default ca party reasonably be cured Within suchdefault a non- monetaryy and is providedthedefaulting that the cure is have a longer3�' day of a thereafter diligently Period of ti>te to at the expense default a to punon su commenced in tha 30 day reriod t that of the non-defaulting party monetary default that a cured agree e that the non-defaulting party shall hve the parties hereby e expenseg ion, to cure ion-mane theebY obligaof the defaulting part defaults of th right,h but not th cured within tie Y if the ' shall have . required timethe defaulting party at the extent the tee lien rights outlined frame)ab" the non-defaulting not terms of this sectionre in Section 6,3 g party 10.5 inconsistent with the _ th the 1366/053:3/28/96 ' 11- EA96IFT4 4-1 44 Ll' ti • g terns of Section 6 above, the terns of Section 6 s).411. govern vit..:1 respect to the natters dealt with in Section 6) . SERWErgE: imarmis POEELL-ORILLIR ARROCIJTU, PUAISST STEEL CORPORATION, a Washington general ay. 0 re.y°'^ corporation, parts By: By:09.62. (1- . Its: c: I!/ fnk.� Its: (/. r c C 7 Ic 1 ,953:1/211,% • .• . .t . • ..• • • •. A... _ ..,.. • �, :...:_ y a • / . . A...; , STATE OF WASHINGTO) ) ss. - -i• COUNTY OF KING ) I On this 8 day of � ,�✓ , 1996, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, • duly commissioned and sworn personally appeared P� u1 LtJ aL'Q , known to me to be the ,//,e.,c�.,•/ of POWELL-ORILLIA ASSOCIATES, the partnership that executed the fe .7egoing instrument, and akn d dgof he BOA nstrunent to be tbe ther free and voluntary on oath stated that he/she vas purposes therein mentioned, and authorized to execute said instrument. I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that the person appearing before me and making this acknowledgment is the person whose true signature appears on this document. • WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year in the certificate above written. • signature 6-74eG L 679KN« • ;f5 ►riot r..+ C) . NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State'-of. •••.• 1 Washington, residing at ' =• , ' My commission expires 7 /0/ a7: a,,, w , C�! 1 ! ••-el,•� r•g. r C'5 .l p'. ', �•0 , ti ' .i • :D ••Jf•;.;My* O • • • , osl: .,o- EA918SIT4 • PAAUH1/POEWfMdEST • . - I STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. COUNTY OF KING ) On this 2 8 day of .� , 1996, before me, the undersigned, aot Nary Public and for the State of Washington, dulycommissioned and sworn personally appeared . , known to me to be the I. of FARWEST STEEL CORPORATION, the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the `. purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute said instrument. I certify that i know or have satisfactory acknowledgmentthat the the person appearing before se and making this person whose true signature appears on this document. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year in the certificate above written. o: LA tee/ 4 C FNeM • e4 Print Name C9 NOTARY PUBLIC in anddand atr a State of Washington,r] My commission expires iv . i c, ' .i T % o„ '?� a' S ' j 1 � : • - § -11- Ea sorrc MOCAMMMULAIMMUIT •_ r • tit ` -.�.r,�s..a+•r+o-ma.+.. ..r.....-....asra� =; _ .., .... II . .- .. ,,, . ..., . LI i - _ . ili .. . EXHIBIT A THE EASEMENT AREA_IS DESCRIBED AS A PORTION OF LOT 7 ACCORDING TO THE BURUNGTON NORTHERN BINDING SITE PLAN AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 161 OF SURVEYS AT PAGES 8 THROUGH 11, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: ! COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAIL)LOT 7. T:4ENCE cn1'TH 87•50'47" FACV "LONG THE NORTH LINE THEREOF 268.86 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 87°50'47" EAST 42.37 FEET: THENCE SOUTH 46'34'27" 11 WEST 22.39 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 130.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 37'09'39" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 84.32 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 83'44'06-WEST 224.17 FEET TO THE WEST UNE OF SAID LOT 7 AND THE EAST MARGIN OF UND AVENUE;THENCE NORTH 02'09'37" EAST ALONG SAID WEST LINE 30.33 FEET;THENCE NORTH 83'44'08" EAST 219.73 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 100.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 32'59'28'AN ARC DISTANCE OF 57.58 FEET TO THE NORTH UNE OF SAID LOT 7 AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING. • I CONTAINING 9,126 SQUARE FEET OR 0.21 ACRES MORE OR LESS. :7'i cN r) 5 s •• a i°pmral.isa 1, 1 • .. 1 1 t i t I :;. • 1 • s . I - 1 l iii I 1 . �.__--- /- -- monism r Iwl ova tag ///_- '. i f r 1 ,, '/ IKA TO K OIGYATLO ITO I / OCT17fn011 i}g1A0(/l/JIOfCNMO /,'/I 1MMU11 4d. 11.02If1:1 I P I 11A1011.1 LIEU...MOO • 1 o • SMLT Y u■Ta �•�/ . ® �, . a Nerscr4rw •"*". / ,/,?../ 0:!..),#LI!‘1011. ot ct s310.7 •arrn.f....._.,4-8.32 cnc��� I I / nnc'Ja�•PONT or et.moo ,-, 4/ ,,it/7s'•'to , .1 - pa 1.4 I O ■ x I I I /ntc "'LC. ��>C43 _ r —� +® 111_t 7 de'�:' '� T6d4T'W ,. TIT LX IYsd - •r _ilWIPD .,11T-1101,& ..,...r•-•• .. --x �,�_��0, . • 1 `=I����laI.= ii i- 1�� o(Tano.. 4 ( �/,ry p/ 3 :'P,.-� / 1 O TYPE II JJCC641L�`T,�SL I 4.---► [X 1d UTi1T1[91T. 1 SOD T'MO C I TOP (ZN, wss•ALT ` DISWW0 30'SAILP0 o Mit T 1I• PM. 11 II 1 $ ImfJ11S3/L01163[SYT. 111 • OC OCTC111104 Swim cc cmo,sink/mitt / • . LR MC I CS 040UCIA34 •T 1�f' : ' 1 • Leh_ • 4 J .. • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • 6 • • • =••••••••••••••• • • • . 7 Oa I. • . 1 , 4. r RIK COMPACWO 00114 AIPTIALT CONCIER. is.11. •-•••• 1m4.COMP/CUD OMR CRUSIRD ROM MSC OR 4-los.COMPACIED 00.141/.30/4M.4 MATO SA$( TYPICAL SECTION ACCESS DRIVEWAY ON LOT 7 TO FARWEST STEEL 0NO WAIL •': '4.3! g69IGZCO9G 4. 9 ., • .** =sm.. .1 •r *A,. • • ••••'•- ' 404. ' •• I . . • , • • • , •Vie) • •`• • • • • • . .• • • • • 4.11•1. • 4. • • •• • When re.:orded return to kola C MacAulay.Fly. Almon,Courtnage.MacAulay c.1'ru�tor 1.1.1' \ �.c I U00 S,,ood Avenue.Suite 39141 Seattle.WA 91(104-14'S ' INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMEN- y o This Indemnification Agreement ("Agreement") is made effective S as of the 28th day of May, 1996 by and between POWELL-ORILLIA ASSCOIATZO, a Washington general partnership ("BOA") , and FARWEST STEEL CORPORATION, an Oregon corporation ("FSC") (individually, an "Indemnitor" and collectively "Tndemnitors") , on the one hand, and HCWA REALTY CORP. , a Washington corporation ("HCWA" or E "Indemnitee") , on the other hand. Indeanitors and Indemnitee agree to all of the following terms and conditions, including the recitals. SECTION 1: RECITALS. 1.1 The Indemnitors entered into an Easement Agreement in March, 1996, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A ("Easement Agreement") , under which Easement Agreement POA grants do easement to FSC over that certain real property (the "Servient Estate") described as follows: 8 "Lot 7, Burlington Northern, _.-a _ binding site plan, according to City of Renton Binding Site Plan recorded June 30, 1992 in Volume 161 of Plats, Pages 8 through 11, inclusive, under King County Recording No. 9206302696. " Ci) which easement ("Easement") is for the benefit of the land owned by C) FSC (the "Dominant Estate") described as follows: GI O "Lot B. Burlington Northern, a binding site plan, t') according to the City of Renton Binding Site Plan C) recorded June 30, 1992 in Volume 161 of Plats, Pages 8 through 11, inclusive, under King County Recording No. C) 9206302696; and (1) CI Parcel A of Short Plat No. 378-79, according to short plat recorded under King County Recording No. 7909249001. " 1.2 The Easement Agreement _runs with the land and grantb certain indemnities to HCWA ender Section 4.2 of the Easement Agreement coverin': certain cl .ims, damages, liability, losses and expenses arising out of or in any way related to any damage through interference with the functioning of an existing underground storm water retention out fall pipe ("Pipe") installed by HCWA across the Servient Estate for the benefit of that certain real property (the "Benefited Estate") owned by HCWA currently and described as follows: "Lot 2 , Burlington Northern, a binding site plan, according to t�.a City of Renton Binding Site Plan recorded June 30, 1992 in Volume 161 of Plats, Pages 8 Page 1--INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT ;t 111 y;':A *G e3. V1 'ley .•• through 11, inclusive, under King County Recording ho. 32U6302696. " 1.3 As HCWA wants its indemnity rights Lr' er Section 4 .2 of the Easement Agreement set forth in a separate indemnification agreement and the Indemnitors are willing to set forth such agreement, the parties are entering into this Indemnification . Agreerent to reflect the terms and conditions of such . Indemnification Agreement. SECTION 2: GRANT OF INDEMNIFICATION RIGHTS. 2.1 The Indemnitors, hereby jointly and severally agree to I indemnify and hold HCWA harmless from and against any anti all claims, damages, liabilities, losses and expenses (including attorneys' fees incurred with or without litigation or on appeal) arising out of or in any way related to any damage to or interference with the functioning of the "Pipe" caused by the Road ' Work, use of the road or any utility installation or maintenance work undertaken by on or behalf of either Indemnitor. For purposes of this Agreement, the term "Road Work" shall have the meaning given it in the Easement Agreement. 2.2 The indemnity granted in this Agreement shall be perpetual in duration. Further, all the terms and conditions of '7 this Agreement shall run with the land and shall inure to the nbenefit of, be binding upon, the successors and assigns, personal p representatives and heirs of the parties hereto, including without C) limitation all subsequent owners of the Benefited, Dominant and O Servient Estates and all persons claiming through of ender them. NN SECTION 3. MISCELLANEOUS. `I 3.1 If either party to this Agreement consults an attorney in order to enforce any of the terms of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reimbursement by the non-prevailing party of the prevailing party's reasonable costs and attorneys' fees, whether such costs and attorneys' fees are incurred with or without litigation or o-. appeal. 3.2 Except for the Easement Agreement, this kgreement constitutes the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the indemnification rights of CWA. Neither party is relying on any " oral or writtc.-i representation made by the other party or the A 1 principals, agents, employees or affiliates of the other party unless such representation is expressed in writing in this Agreement. Except for the Easement Agreement, this Agreement -- supersedes any prior written egret ments between the parties pertaining to such indemnification rights. This Agreement may be amended only by a writing signed by both parties. Nothing contained herein shall affect an Indemnitor's rights to seek Page 2--INDESNIFICATION AGREEMENT I 0 :r. !::a.. vi,•5..;'i''jfF..q... .q-,.. Ct# .t-!•`..�,0 y_.K.. ,i1 .:r',.: ,,4.4. .. payment reimbur-sment or contribution from the other Indemr.itL under th:a yr -:ement Agreement. 3.4 No claim of waiver, consent or acquiesce- c_e with respect to any provision of this Agreement shall be made against either party unless such party has expressly waived, consented or acquiesced in writing. In such latter event, the waiver, consent or acquiescenco shall not apply to any future action or inaction. 3.4 Any demand, or notice given under or in connection with this Agreement shall be in writing and served either personally or sent by registered or certified nail, postage prepaid, addressed as follows: To: FSC Farwest Steel Corporation Attn: David Forester P.O. Box 889 Eugene, OR 97440 With a copy to: Robert A. Stout Hershner, Hunter, Andrews, Neill & Smith, LLP P.O. Box 1475 Eugene, OR 97440 40 To POA: Powell-Orillia Associates 1 Attn: Peter Powell Q) 737 Market Street O Kirkland, WA 98033 With a copy to: Robert MacAulay O Alston, Courtnage, CO MacAulay & Proctor, LLP • 1000 2nd Avenue, Suite 3900 01 Seattle, WA 98104-1045 To HCWA: HCWA Realty Corp. c/o Home Base 3345 Michelson Irvine, CA 92715 Attn: Vice President, Real - Estate With a copy to: Waban Inc. One Mercer Road Natick, MA 01760 Attn: Vice President - General Couiael •q Page 3--INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT e • iY �.1 rM :A,'��' c r.l"•. "'��.rl 1 i� 7 ..G j•'t ac. ....!.✓�Y t'•.'� . . .Lt^� �!. f►�!�••rb.��Ya.. .e.0-e Or to suc► other address as the parties may diet in w•.it1 ilg. If mail -e, the demand or notice shall be deemed delivered t.;.o (2) Jays it is placed in the mail. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date aboie written. POWELL-'J:.ZI.LIA ASSOCIATES, YARWZBT STEEL CORPORATION, • a Washin on general partnership an Oregon corporation By: Its: �,c ar/t.,l� :/An# ,rt,_ Its: ll�1 RCMP. REALTY CORP. , a Washington corporation s y: i - 1 Its: Authorized By: Its: • v7 It Page 4--INDEPQ'IFICATION AGREEMENT .: ; F •♦ •' f �I Li'.1 i' _'�? ��k .1{..�.�w:�.�� l- .l.�.. -��-..�.A t: �w STATE OF WAS'-'NGTO2i ) ) ss. COtZ'TY v? Juha ) . On this O day of May, 1996, before ma, the undersigned, a Notary Public-£and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn personally appeared }� -� (L%, - 66c•�, L' , known to me to be the Cc tFz1 L nd.Y i1W of POWELL-ORILLIA ASSOCIATES, the partners`iip that 4xecuted the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said partnership, for the purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he/she was authorized to ex,4eute said instrument. . I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence tht•t the person appearing before me and making this acknowledgement is the person whose true signature appears on this document. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year in the certificate above written. { x7 oft-. ma Oi WASHINGTON Pir H... o o o yw�CEnSC►�rvll�GtEa ► NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State o ►•Y^DOcint war EFpYp M 10.1 m 0 of�,,� ashin , residing at CZ My commission expires 7. 74 . 9.,,K G7 O C,) O O C:D Page 5--INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT • • t .,..i r _ 1 t, I4,7. .r,e...*l�:.s s ......J,.I T. .,..a:ir-•. t •-. . a.. .,r,_s. y•%!�',...�in.3.C`f J :: • .. . <�_ *a common/EALre or Mxssacsosirrs ) ss. L%'T' Y OF MIDDLESEX ) Tee.. • On this 041, day of Mel, 1996, before mr:, the undersigned, a Notary Public in the Cosioawealth of Massachusetts , duly commissioned and sworn personally appeared known • to me to be t • p, H A f. the • corporation execu ed the gpi SId4ft trument, ' and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act j• and deed or said corporation, for the purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute said instrument. i I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that the r person appearing before me and making this acknowledgement is the person whose true signature appears on this document. i WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year in the certificate above written. ss..W.. E i I s•� Luc- e, E_ Ra Iey NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the CoasoavealtbCZ 1 Cr) of ssach setae residing at lift, j"` sc�,i (N t LA_ ,URIC mtn, My comma sion expire P�`bfic f 30. 1999 0 N i 0 CD ;T w N 1 . • Page 6--INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT r t f . . 0.._ .e.i _`. •.. Kr:.t 4,. .. ;•i+ r a. ...1 .r a. t4::'fvia a i.n t:.rw .:: . 4 ST7 -E OF OREGON ) ) ss. COli27'I Y OF LANE ) • On this or-l4h day of May, 1996, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Publican and for the Stat of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn personally appeared ')44 R . ¶ rcS+ Y , known to me to be the V c - reSid of FARWEST STEEL CORPORATION, the corporat on that executed the foregoing i. instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and ` voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the purpores therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he/she was authoriz s: execute said instrument. I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that the Y person appearing before me and making this acknowledgement is the person whose true signature appears on this document. t WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year in the certificate above written. cwnc1.'u•sfu „• �'� - e-, :' • NY WAVIERMYwiss+oH piapiaoy1r7la CD • issioN E p REs mAy p.nee Not NA.. (;) NOTARY A UBLIC in and for the State Cr) of O� o , residing at O c�Y o as m� G«),r1 ' 0) My an noires '-9.91 i O O `tt c f Page 7- -INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT - a 0. 41. ` • • ::g; v:,: s` ar . .:....,1. ►v v aarv, TV r1 -, .:I •' il.11 142S1! .. ' • i •f'.' LT1a.AYD, RA, f60J1 ► !f z..,•.•T"j 1211X.l.i. lay=11.1= `. • '• . +,; This Basaaaat Agreas•nt (nAgr.tleut1) is sae- .,a this .� da.0 • • _ • � •••_.• i• of''1Iarch, 1996 by and b.tv-An uuv-a�Lllt Ass 'Jcl, 1i -Y "; ;;;:t i:.'Washin0ton general psrtnarsh1p '"Gr.rtor") axed i]U11T STIYL 3 n� ,CGJZBOTI zoi, aw Al oorpor: Han ;•lrnnt•a-) Grantor ant pp '� • 'Grants: •grad to 111 of the following taros and conditions, W including the recitals. . 1 ZSII It 1LlclrALs • 'eq. ` 1.1 Grantor owns that oertain real property (tha "Serviant i ' ' sstats") dascribad as follows: *• i 1 . • ...... :I.... Lot '7, Burlington northern, a binding sit* plan, 1 according to City of Renton Binding Bite Plan racorded ( 1 CI Juna 30, 1992 in Volume 161 of Plats, Pages 6 through 11 • . ( • .4 inclusive, under Xing County Recording No. 9206302696.E ql . 1.2 Grantsa owns that cart.ain rail property (the "Dominant .1 Estate") deaoribed as follovsl 1 •1 i ....'c Lot E{ Burlington Northern, a binding site plan, 1 d,p according to City of Banton Binding Sits Plan recorded 1 - June 3D, 1992 in Volume 161 of Plats, Pages 6 through 11, j inclusive, undar Xing County Raoording ho. 9206302696; • :-. and i • Pascal•A of.Short Plat No. 37s-79, aocording to the short . • plat retarded under Xing County Recording Ho. 7909249001: t 1.1 Attached hereto as Trhibtt A is • description of what • -j CZ • Stull hereinafter be referred to ■e the esas.sant Property.". • m. ; Zs.esant Property 1s • portion of the Serviant tst•ts. Attached r hereto as ►.yhtbit A-1 is ■ drawing alloying tb. Baseyeat Property C.) witA croaatstabinq. ("I •1.4 Grant. r.. wishes to hay. s000ss ove and oertain utility rights under the Baaeser,t Property. •Grantor, i+ r1111nq to grant' 1 such.rightl to Grant.. on the terse and conditions contained in O this Agresrent. i.LCTioc tt GR.0 0? zx a f 2.1 Sob .ot to the cther terms and conditions outlined in •thin Agrasaenc, .Grantor hereby grants to Grants. a non-■Yclu■ive usam.nt over and under the iaaaaant Property for purposes of (1) • obtaining pedestrian snd/oz vahioular ingrass to and .grata from 3 • the Dominant rstate and (2) from tiro to tins installing and *alnt•ining in the subsurface of the Eaaeaant Property storm sever, uwariaravw •1. FILED t'OR RLCORD AT RSWUES7Ztet4 }• uuatvraatvren+ttt [XCISEii.xNOT REQCA.4FLrRANZATIoS TITLE U UL1NcL.ca va' C+.Maev Dr limn 31t1 mum AVM h3 '`��4\ rrn a BEiLEVUE WA 91TA , 1 / • • • - IPA EXHIBIT a il • Page 1....of ,t. a .,ti ,' .rey� • v. Ire, ner • ': sn oars: electrical, . : • syst.sis rerritq the Doa1Mr `ite Ruch eas•a.nt rights ah..11 • to a* tie "fast roc-• {; ', hsrelJsatt+r be oollrctively referred :. . . •,' Grant ear iY t11a 'jv1 er. . ' ',`y l.2 Grantor represents and*parents reheat ,;".al;t.' to grant the L+►s.,a.ts. • :-s;4of'�„ sarvieat Estate and has the `&Sl'? esnt, �l^.nta• has the ,+r3 kn4 that, subject to the terL• of the { . Ff ,{;right.to quietly enjoy the easements. ; $ 2 l ct_f t r101/ 07 ': ' • tad in toil Lrjraamant shall be perpetual in :t �j xasasants•gran • ??`duration• ' 1 .Y.: ' 4.1 In oonsidvratlon for the above grant of the ruesants, z,:: i '' that hereby agrees it rill oaa•snoe on or before that dry a dare after receipt of the requisite building .'.:;Vwhieh'is ninety (90) Y . wblchevar is 3at.r, i .lparait(s) or removal of the required surobarg • • • : and plats (subject to force aajeurs delays beyond Grantee'. •��i•..rsasonabls control) on or before that data which is on. (1) year after the camaancaaaot data, at Grantee's ial�ttaohnse, Tito and anent' depicted cat pelt bit n, ;�xiniorporated barsin by this reference (sue road liprovaraant work • ▪ --''rba11 hereinafter be referred to as the 'Road work"). arant$e ' shall pursue diligently and in good faith tha raquirlt• perait(s) • •;..and the ooraenoesant and oospl•tiao of the required surcharge work R • so es•to yield a ocamancer•nt date for the Road Mork that is as ' close to the data of this A{Treesant as is reasonably pos.ibLa. O •- X Grantee shall •cause the Road Work to be completed in a good.and • ', wor)caanlika tanner in in accordews with all applicable law and ` # • n:regulatio and iribut undue delay once the Road Work has t cvneenoad. Ia addition, Grantee *grew; to keep the Jervisnt Locate • free of any 1i.ns .arisinq out of or related to the Road Work end - 1f a lien is nonetbalus filed against the • as tees nt ttooparzosyt]y (� , out of or relating to the Road Work, 9 of , j ;, � CI post a bond at Grantee's expanse in accordance with to the tors,ase tof i • RCS? 60.04.111, all the Saxe hay•b. ns•nd•dr construction O 6.rvi.nt Estate free such lien. afore signing a a Ito:ny comae shall coatrnots for all or any portion of the Road C7 • . submit the nose of the proposed contractor. or contractors ito Grantor, together with copies of Cb. propoeed • • ;1 Grantor, (r) and rohedul•(s), all of which shall ill t to not be review and approval of Grantor, which app :.7 Unreasonably withheld or delayed.. f 4.2 )iCW7' Realty Corp,'a Washington corporation ((9IC1lh") is . •• the current owner of Lot 2, .burl tan Iorthern, a binding sits plan, a000rding to City of p.amton binding site Plan recorded June l of sthrough 11, inrlYsive, • '• 70, 1992 in Volume 61 Plats, Pages "• .1- eiiusit ' rwu.yra�alJ,u+ j • / . . . . . . .:' . .:. r.. , T��Y • e EXHIBIT i j t'a e 30(_I '.•:w1 Stiti /: �ti1 e•a:.;'.X.4,.•;•wine°. ..* ,{��..,•„,.... , . !L;; s,r..:c.a(.,;N.1. ,:��..(1�' �� ./ a • under Kinp rsunty Raaord.g An. 170630764fi. A portion c, 'it's road' . ' daacribed jr, irnibit A will c•E: ,s o.er an existing unv,r.,"ound . .:>.,storm vatar rat/intim cattail pips insta:l.1 by HCKA Grantee anti • :. Cantor hereby jointly and asverally ogre's to indemnify end n,ld . '.'X= and its successors, assign, zT5nta, scployaen and ineltase Wireless from and against any and all c t_ma, daxngee, 11ab111tiu, losses and expanses (including attoxr../a• fees incurred with or 1 without litigation or on appeal) ....rising out of or in any way .'—related to any damage to or intarfsrenoe with the functioning of such pip. caused •by the Road Work, use of the road or any utility installation or naintrnance work undartakan by on or on behalf of Granter or Grantor. Grantor and Grantee hereby agree that 1icih has • "'given sufficient oonsidaration for this indeanity and that 14CXA say • rely on this inaasnity even though it is not a parts •to this Agreement. - . Sienla% St t7TILITTE2 • F . . 5.1 Exoapt. as provided in Section 5.2, any utilities . installed under the iaseaant Property for the benefit of the • r, Dominant zatate shall be installed at the sole expanse of Grantee •and shall be n&ixrt- .r d in a good condition at the sole expena. of 4 Grantaa. Sisilarly, of o,ourss, es it Grantor .lt. to.install any k,utilities,under (or above) the it Property, ouch shall be ' ' ti.initall.d and r.aint.in.d in a good condition at Grantor's vole • vn1•n•' expense. Prior to commancinr any utility Installation or repair m• Work and prior to Grantor connecting to any utility system 9-4-• Rinstalled by Grantee pursuant to Section 5.2, the party wishing to • parfors the installation, repair or connection work (bsreinaftar !•.retorted to as the "Working Part •) shall (1) provide the other . . •tg:,• party.' with a written description of the . work in cuastion • • oI . (includingq, but • not lir.ited to, information• regarding . • •:,•; location/layout,. airing and invert), as well as the proposed ti*a . • r : franks within .hioh the work vill•b. don. and (2) use reasonable • • •..: good •faith .r ct_a to .ccooxodate reasonable tieing revisions . • . • .•proposed by t other party (the Working Party .ball agree to 0) oonduct the work in question attar noraal buaineaa hours if•.the Cn • work Will materially inter-fare with tither stomas or the provision • O of utility ■srvioeu to the other party'. parcel). In 1..1 avente, . • the'Working Party shall (1) take reasonable. steps to sinisise•any• • • •'•• disruption to the other party caused by the work in gneetion and •• ' . • (2) complete the work In a good and vorkaanlike harmer and in accordance with all applicable laws and roc/Illations. Moreover, if Granter is the Working Party, Grantee shall not allow any Liens to C.,C., . • ' ;. be filed against the S..rvient Estate miring cut of or related to CI v�,ths r. Vora in Question, end if each a lien is onatheless filed . • Against the z.rvient Istata, Grant.. shall, at Grantee's sole • '.•,,,,♦rpensi, post a bond in accordance with the taraa of PZW 60.04.161 . so is to resove the lien from the 6arvient Lstate. If the utility work in qu.stlon.vill dasase any of the Road Work i*prov.sants, the i. • Working Party ab-11, promptly after completion of the work in• •+:•!T3U/eS3rsluM •3- uiewt6 • •• .SZ- i • • • II • • .�ti - ^ i _• ,:Co.."'. i ;. ti ;r H. ` ,.....s J' ice:• • .� EXHIBIT •t'j 1 • • . . 'tfr• .c;). Page Hof•.t, '"�' .. �..,.f r and • fi, • at tDs riozkln4 Pa-�'� tba tom!t 1.os► t'I•y war* =d • i • •. reply.oa zwv.vts . ■ti.... : I i prior t t Roo ray t of tS• work in G� ooaae b� *.i. I ' ,• ;trios to the nholl at ell tines. e: • ; 6:l 'Grantor, at Grantor's " `a c--luvet to any utility sYU�� entice t0 Grantee or t into or � t o �--V toe tlla Dominant 'rt :^ j i the benefit 1 installed by any i la `d E` :) art-ten Qo°s not without paying •'rei7'btuw•0t Dtili y provide! sties,ca rs iall �� it:, .,, the utility system' in .� gaper-JAI,,ass .a`' i •• • its aszvic• to crantas��(utny ility sl shall be split between• <� ion Cry anytoe to thiir respective amounts , 'Grantor ash �arctse in proportion gosition ()swayer, it the sa myna o t i .usage• ntto the a•911q ar intantional sa oo it the repair shall bear all erPe s ■soon eisrtvir party a point in utility 7D Y ino in t■ezvsa that � spiv • me of tba D in t2�s rtpair or „aintenancs ,. . { • rs ra, r D U to require• •shall not zcit tar "Will b or all of the utility rdvl� eO� � � me, Do such a ` �s�aa the up capacity to Gran-are In bsi tranto by t° a es relay { ((a Gsarstor yaps for all additional t its CI that o�+ersis* and (b)utility r slt m p Cranto th• Doss' a iven unlitr system prior.•s (in °U"s words, once ' CI orator' 4 tion o! such sy shall 1�q•r have the Grontoa of tan installation Grantor •'. c�7t•. has been ins tyto require oversislnff)• . • rovenente shall bs saintained by the oork icl presentable condition and all 6.1 • 'it* Road oats, clean awl D lit batveen the yard■$ in a d in' shall be P • costs incurred in ouch sib ed an the ratio of ttss total floor.N on a pro seta basis on a party's pascal to the • 1 CD • �K it all builds located on both the•D®iMct r,tats and . tine a building is located on floor area t all buildings til ouch t tha nsrYient ' Grantee at Croatia!" expanse, shall have the tha BKviant ist+t•• irod m,intansrtios work without anf native 2 O right to sent from any Grantor. ld is looatad•on tha t (') consent fro• Grantor. � w• r ,t to nnd■rtsks any . l , • O : servient rotate, either party 'hall do so -!'hoot first� (� •• required *alntanancs tusk, but of the work v�orkyin question, t� �� • O advingf r s otter party contractor or contractors f. It tha other cn tlsfnq for each work, t1» e ,iatea cost �`r14t (includll+g , r will persons �' work and proposed tieing,• party r��ly obj•cL to the D p•lov) or oantz*eLor or the:, alloaatiun thsreof a see Section rin question, the parties shall n•ad !� the Qafaith to baton' the work 4 wiaavor in good faith to estU.e their dSltaraacesy will inp c,' is ooaa•no•d, and it th•y az' unable to do so, wa.,a •' _. • 4 ' : V. I � EXHIBITa . Pale of Jj IP r—. ^ c.a to • 'tom arbitration prtoetl••ra describe,: below in Foction action in goes`-io t I. raesaraabL, If the dtr..raat• t t.raher .neth that ob evtlon le :es•.A•bla, it shalt •`. • : ter the appropriate tbaL the j 3- elate order under the aircasatanue (...g.1 it aY enter tie bidding, • t of the work, a cht nge '= orntr ct.or, a • daisy in onth j of aa$t h• purras.tt to tho ' ponts•aotor, a disproportionate sharing cede: CJ:1t the cork •` : terns of section 6.2 below, etc., or it U) ,. '.,.Dead net be done at all). the forego�l► however, any saintenanae 6.3 M°tvithst e7o t7 or intentional tisoonduot of a • pa , or a p by the nogl ttnanU► agents or inviteea, shall or a party s employeesr • ye paid for solely by such paztY• •: • 6.3 With regard to maintenance work done i-n acoordanoe with • }:.the torsi of Sections 5.2 or 6.1 above► the instigating party shall such work ti invoice the other party for LUs after coaDl share of the etlon t o! each work • . within one hundred fight' (160) day ' `• and, if the party being invoiced is Grantor, each invoice' shall be tacecapa•ried bya full lien release fro& the general contractor who l •'.;1r: tion. she invoiced party' shall was responsible for the work in of question within fifteen (13) j t its pro rate share of the coot in m ; parlies with the tarns of tee • =: •dame ittat the instigating party If e invoiced party fails to immediately preceding senteacs. T : �.taa the sun in qusationke.soch payment within such 15 day period, it rate of '.'shall begin to scorns interest at the rate of the pnats Ti f • : .. 6 •.inttrast as charged at the ties in quaetion by Sels'• . -Mational Dank, Main Branch, plus five percent (St) par ennae, froe q the date of. paya*ot. It the and of such 15 day period throoa�sent by the invoicing party, • •,i•addition, any such claim for r.isburs shall bei • secured : together with the ebow-described take interest, recordation of ::: right end a lien shall attach and the invoicing party Sr toe' • the Derv-dascrlbad aisle of lien by -' Xing county Recorder's office. The claim of lien shall include the '• :?•following: (1) the rase of the claisantt (ii) .a etitaaent • Concerning the basis of the claim of the lien; ( i) the last•• nown ' O uses and address of the 'owner or reputed owner 0 •against which the lien it claimed; (iv) a description or the reel • • property against which the lien is claimed; (v) a description of • tbs work perfora.d, or payment eada which has given rise• to the ' there of lion hereunder the lien isnt claimed pursuant to the o • r:_ th • ereof,terl and (vl) ''' the terse of this A.greeeent reciting the recordation number of this ' +� • igreament. The olais of lien shall be duly uoknnwlodged and shall "contain a certificate that ■ copy thereof bee ;,Ben served upon the • owner against whom the lien is claimed, sithc: by personal service •• or by sailing to such owner by certified tail sent fros Ting county, washington. The lien so claimed shall attach from the date : of recordation solely in the ancunt claimed thereby and it.may be • ' enforced by suit, under power of sale (which power is hereby • granted), judicial f•reclosur• or in any other tanner allowed by t• uammt t3u,7naioM }: rypau,ur++Krt • s t • -r-irir•• • 1 . • . . . • . • i .4 • . .�. EXHiB)T Pape . f � tie • �o '. .. r^t, r r 1t L Z .ter a r7.-: , . i • uLarciss of the p�'!� or %. lkW for the for'•olosure of liens. aocord•-oo t ow la or •'•iale or foreclosure shall be ooe uctsd the •rare• �= f" -r' �i • of the State of Ilashingtoo apglisu�blo and evade of trust.. 2f sa.i in or foreClovLea of aor`gaq a. d.,oin the trustee spy rpose, the ercioia4 partyof sale, With full rig`'•. .._ fox l�sposes of exerci�irq "um power a toregoie�4, tuck liens sr•11 b.. • subordivtioa. any m hataodinq ups sa tit givsa in goo with t• to any mortgage or deed of lac- eA • • alas now or hxzwaftar such ring t.'a p 7s t ranocedIt , to ore Haar P of the liar and any puzoosser at any r to the recording antis by deed in " � prior or trnst•+'r sale (as vs.{1 as any �prior mortgage or 1Lsa of for.alosur• or txuste4'r sale) under• anyys than !heisting or deed of o shall' ubke fro.ecta to tba provisions of f this 1.=eurant. • 1l,ep, but otbarviM subject 6.4 If the paitias are unable to resolve their dlffareno.+ as to an issue arising out of Sections 5.2, 5.1 or 6.2, the dispute .ball be resolved by single-arbitratorarbitration oci Arbitration before the VI American Arbitration Aswalation under Lira from rat• f ration 111. sa :.forea :modified es follows: (i) s all:moat exceed thirty (30) days: for arbitration to final he choean by tea American Arbitration en (ii) tbs Arbitrator shall eot to challenge • CI .' onlyAssociation without submittal of lists notice „ by telephone or `• pn17 for good cause shown; (iii) nay writing/ • ca other electronic ooimmication rats later cons shall a in by the c p: •. (iv) the tine, data and plaoe of the bearing s a that that. shall be Arbitrators in his (or5 hers prilo or or notice of the bearing: (v) there be at least five {S) �y bleats: (vi) tsars shall be no discovery 1 shalp be no demob thevie the Arbitrator sba11 apt by order of Arbitrator: and (vii) the close c.f the ; lastiss his or her sward wit saran pr7)ovisions say be roditlyd by • basrin•7 •Any of the above p • 'stipulation of the partial. Ibs decision of the Arbitrator shall be final end diction. thee and a4 hereby fe in leas the Arbitrator • . from sent and all TA+ psAgainst the Arbitrator Lrpa ■ny and all claims or possible claims . 0) based on the decision of the Arbitrator. Tha attorneys/prevailing aili g party om the proceeding shall be awarded revand fees, costs and Cr) • and non-■rpert vitnass costa and expenses, ro expanses incurred in connection with the arbitration,. unless the, . C7 • 'Arbitrator for good tarns detarsin•s otharviso. The costs and.feis CD , of the Arbitrator shall be borne by the non- revalue^n party,. unlaas thscArbitrator for good cause dstsralnsa oth•rvira. • 't •periox 71 ca¢15-21nrI dosnify CILacb party to this lgrsament hereby agrsas 'to in and: i • • bold the other party barsless fro& and against any and all claims,' damage's, liabilities and aupensae (including attorneys' faeu • incurred with or without litigation or on appeal) arising out of or', r t1fgl/di7tVuA4 ` iWnNL 1 • • _ • . . • M • I EXHt8 Al .v.., Pegs JL a! je ; i�;`e L i S•-t r -� .o. 0. 1: I^ �� r ., t'� h� � • ,4,:, . *-. il. .;. in ally voy relet•rd to the urn of the !servant Prop)' ..1 ti-' 41r2 � 4ryinq party; its esployeoe, t.nti, agents or invitees. • :,'Motrithetending the foregoing, it t... t. .sisa, damages, lint.'':..'.^+ . �"a�ensaa so arising are caused oonosrrent uI�s71 ',anoe of • . both parties, their employees, , agents or invit4::, each shall irndeanify the other only co tha att.ant If ?As . indemnifying'party's own negligence or thlt -f it- agents, taaants, J en 1Plr►a dr invitase. ?ba foregoing and .-! is .Saar, i�y� expressly intends', to constitute a salty: ofh pa n+o.r+ar7 under industrial Insurance Title Ii Rd, to e • ' r. provide the indesnified party with a couplet* indeanit' for the , znegiiq.nos of the itndsumityilog party'+ employees, ly..s, to the is negotint ation tiof 1 ' their uegligeno., and has bean the subject ofop . : between the parties. rtotwi the joint end several 3 ' liability language via a vls BC1tM, as outlined in S.otion 4.2 _ ' above; any claims sada by WO under the section 4.2 iodeanity . ' ,.: shall be allooated between orsntor and Grantee in accordance witt5h ..the terse of this Section 7. f c 4/renter hereby reserves the right to use the easement Property • -eat - however it wishes (including the right to construct improv.seats rl :t• nn) coder and above the Ls.soent ?a',perty) provided such as. does T '.granted rights unde or r the unreasonably interfere Inn addition,th Grunt.or h rshy reserves all other rights in and to the samesent Property not' "specifically ',ranted to Grantee herein. . d9QY'I Z II IOOCEs)Old 1119_0lIQI8 All of tha.terse and conditions of this Agreesont &hull tun • i with the land and shall inure to the benefit of, and be binding ; upon, the successors snd aseigne, personal repr.Yss�tatiyes and , •• b.irs of the parties berate, including without liaitation all . . ■ube.quant owners of th. Dominant and servient Estates andL•all ' • CD persons c1a1ainq through or tinder thee. , G7 plc rioht i a t lciscal t txrooI : 10.1 If either party to this Agreement oonsults ar "tonney in 0 ' order to enforce any cf the terse of this Agree entr the prevailing party shall be entitled to reimbursesant by the non-pr. eili.q • . —. party of the prevailing party's reasonable oorta. and attorneys'•'J teas, whether lunch mote and attorneys' fs...are incurred with or (1.) - without litigation or on appeal (to the extent'inconsistent with #: Cl the foregoing, the tares of c.ction e.4 shall govern over the foregoing with regard to the arbitration procedure described in .• , aact.ion e.4). • .i : ►ia{nrs iY2LN •I• WOOld y . 1 . • 11012 ,111:r• _ -.. ' • ..EXNIOIT A r Page of '_.. .• ' • X rf,.% _ • `� ,:•' i i• , ,;,a . '''.f.;er'. !.•-.,l Y.. .r`A i s '40 .•• .:jp':,L lc s i • ' IC.2 T.sa Agrceoent constitutes the .ntlre agr..mart of to. •parties with respect to t'u wavelet 4eoparty. Xeithar party is relying on any oral or vritt•vi r epr•.r•ntatiof made.' y L. other party or the principals, agents, earplr'`e or afti'1 ties' of trot . • other party aimless svdi rtpr.santation is caaraased an writir{ in • this kgr.essrt. This Arirtilbeist d•1p.rs.d4a any pri-.r L c is between the parties pertain_s r ti, the tas.rnnt Property. • 1e .gressant may be &sanded only )h a writing signed by both • parties. 10.3 Xo claim of waiver, consent or acquiescence with raspsr.t • to any proriaiai of this Agressant shall be sada against either party males ouch such party has sxpr saly valved, oonsaatad or . aogaieso.d Lavritia.. In such latter avant, the waiver,.00nsent . or soquiesca.oe stall not apply to any future action or inaction. . • ' 10.4 This Agr.aayst is the result of substantial negotiations • between and itrpot fro* both parties and their raapectivc coura*l. . Consequently, is Agrassent shall be construed in accordance with el the fair intent of the language contained herein as a whole, and • 41 not for or against any party, regardie.s of who p.rfornad the op5 ••bechanioal function at drafting this Agrea.ant. • tit 10.5 If either party defaults under this Agree ant, the other c party nay exarcisa any or all rights and remedial' available at Iaw (p or in ►quity, including the right to sue for opacities performance. v) both parties acknowledge and agree that it is necessary that each party have available to it ■e a potential remedy the right to sue • for specific parfornanoe. However, before exercising any rights or { ' rea.di.s, each party shall give the other party written notic. of l • the default and five (5) busina*s days to cure a sonstary'default t and thirty (30) days to cure a non-sonatary default (if ■ non- •:•aoawtary default cannot rwonably be cured within such 30 day • ••'•r period, the defaulting party shall bave a longer period of ties to • cure'provided that the care is cose.nced within the 30 day period :.7 • and is thareartat diligently pureuad to completion). In the .vent 1, '' of a sonatary,default or a non-sonstary default that is cured at it 0, . ;�• the • ct the non-defaulting party (the parties harsh./ sore. ?� 0 ,., that the non-defaulting party shall have the right, bat-not the . ,� 0 !•• obligation, to cure non-sonatary defaults of the other party at the •. • arpenas of the defaulting party if the defaulting .arty has not 0 .enured within the required ties frame), the non-d.rauitin? party shall have the lien rights outlined above in Section E.3 (to the O extant the terns of thin Section 10.5 are inconsistent with the 11 j! �M r:. i'I'• .{ 3. . 1 .. ° 1,. r ...ExHIBIT.4c ....:• . ?age to - ..... ;. . .. ... .levee N......r...w ...a. .......w...._._ . . - . 1 ' . . - ' • . • • • • % • •••• • I •• . ' 1 • . • . . - , , 1.11 .••. • .:,. . .• 1.4.arati of itocilon 6 above, raa terse of il•tctIzo 6 shall logror.• u :Y. ...respeot to the sitters dealt with la 36etlon 6). •• ....'22Aitallti =MI, ' ...I . .:POIVIII MOOCUISILII, Y.1.--nair v1 trz commerztair, , • , a Ila general kg,j. ttl..._..,... eazpos•atet, ; •— •BY, Ily:PC9,a 2111.01"C- . . ; . • Its' _..G.fa2...qA-052165A4.e Itaii ("A f 9-4...-1.........••••‘• • • .. . -• . • VI ' CP.'•. • . co, ..: • w4;: P••• . . el • 0 . • . 43 . cra . • • •• . ! • • (.0 CI . .. 0) CD . . • •• • : .. . . . / CI • • . C'.) • , i 0 (.0 • . • I • • • . . . • • • CI - .• . . • .• • . • • . • ..• • .• ' ..•.. . ..... p. tiodAsJarties ... . LAMM• • . MASPSICI.I.M/ANSI . • . • • • I . ' - . . • • • . . •• . • ' • • • . . . .. .• • • • ... . • • - .• _— . • • • • - . • . • . • • • . • • • • . . • •. • . • • • • • -.. allii • . Isokfteed..13.. . • . ., • . •••%. 1;.,;-'.:.'..titii:14.4.7.- •• • • • .•• .0 . • • • . EXHIBIA Pap," of --...r.;.:-, --t,- , -..• -. •- - . 4 ,.. •..- • ..,.-- ,...-- -,../..f.. -. , ',„•,;.:•-4.. ,::-....,-:..6‘..---,-,s..,., . ... _ . •,.-. _‘,.. ,vt- -- v.vit-.. '.4 4..j:-..--i':—.' ."_;•4Aff.ii: ---',e;:i...'..;''''' --'''''' ''''' ... '- P.. "-"`" '''%":1',1•4*./.1 •. • •-..,.!..v-,•'f,....••, ,r...%•,••••-.•-4,•t,.. %.,..., . sr ( • • ^ n 3 1. 1 of tLSZ U oTw, ) ) 1. • `•: •cn this .g day of , 19f6, bc::es xe, t.w .• . .-tndarsigned, a Mo�nr]' Pcblie anC >c•r tisa state of reshiagtx, •.•dul oosisainaed end sworn personally F7�t� r , known to as to 1.a Lae T�� • CIAffil, the p .xscataQ Um& •'r•tng and aaknowledq said ia+ts rtt,o 1 . ::the from and voluntary act and dead of Laid partnership, tor r lzpos�s thstaif a�tioned, and on oath stated that ba/ahe was • a Odsad to emaciate said inetruaant. i I carts that I know • or bawls satisfactory evidence that the • • " q before to and slaking this aUmowlsdgesnt 1a the - p �t whose signature appears on this docusent. [IlfU9 my band asd Official meal berate affixed the day and • ,.year is the oartificata above written. / _ • • Its.... C,,T�/ f '... , •• a '• in roSLIO in and for • /t teal'"!, I ' r laabiogton, residing at �:... i.„'t . • CI ;• xy maxi mite:* expires �i‘.. ' • O sI if. •.. .to �•i.- �•• • t V �j • rl �cV� • 1 CD • 1 0 0 . 0 . ' • c, ?: , • .. I • . Is t14//Q7/1Itlr*$ •w' • WOWS • • wra ttik uituwort • - • • @r .I . i • • • • Pago ..1.0.-";11k.; . .r i - s 1 -. :1 'y./ ti .w ..t• I....'•...J t . .I •,St• •'•1 ../. ..•. •'. ....♦ .i - -'111.•.w w-V ...•'• ' - JUTS oT x:.t soi ) ) W. • • aomrir Or uWa . ) . + OD this Z t day of ► 1!!i, >'tora s� tTe .!ndersigned, a 'rotary lblii ii 'otter t i Atst of waahirgton, ! .duly commissioned and iwrn patsooa.ly appeared�F. /.-- of riras't � cau0 .�A, the corporati to se o at onthatazacuted t e 1 . l fors9Oing instrument, and acknowledged tha said instrument to ho , tha free and voluntary act and dad of said corporation, for the s therein santioaed, and co oath stated that as/s?sa was . auc orri:sd to *reacts said instrument. t I certify that X know or have satisfactory s.idenos that the pars, -Na aapsarim before as and raking this eckoovledgaant is the parswa rn5oossss true aignatnra appears on this document. wI?7rs.$ my hand and official ssal hereto affixed tbs day wld rear in tha cestitioate above vrittan. tn • IIz�nt mama �f4kr..� c1 1lpVX1' PV31.IO in and for •s state of • 1 n Washington residing at ._.� v Xy oosmiialon expires 0fy • .- . i kb • • •• L.:•d lc ;,^'1. • t,D .v, . ) +... r. ' ; 1 • 0 • ., '4 ' i 4 • !. is • • i ; 064.0t4 /=iv% •n• Moot • bliow•onu.naasst • • • • • friVartian TWIN . .• • • • ' f :`: 9 '•I `.; • • i • .. ..-..-:,:,,,,.:,...,,:,•;:: •9 c,l.,( 4 I s 1 1 ,tummy.A AtA.'/OftT10H Of UT 7 AcooRO HC I—I s � l• • T o'1-1:IUFt1NO TON MOT)r1W WOW)GTf FLAN As titC0f.roo 1N vou)';l le 1 01 su tV2Y$ AT FAOCS I THAOt1GH 11. ROCO 10N FAg Of 0 COL).'TY. Wn,.SNzhfcr :1 ' Di$CIIOND AR►OLtOwlr • • . COitlt9faq AT The NOKT1fWllf COfa�OF tNW LOT 7.tltttiS7 fi0UT11 s7'c4'4r EAr/iL,ONO TM NORTH Will 110040f 26s.ed p r TO THs ►0 OP u0r+UN3 •• • t�f1.1Ct CO►(TWINO 5011T14 s7.54'4r O J 42.37 F'a i THWC3 SOUTH 4S•34'27' • 1+30.00?UT THROOOH A=VAin 21.711 FUT TO TKI AL A$OL!CLAY! r00'w AN c sTANC2 of 14.32 • MIT;TREKS SOUTH s3.44`OC Weal 224.17 FRT TO Tas wen urn OF SAO LOT 7 WET P,30.33 PM)THRi�i MATH 1'44'00'°!AST210.73 PEFT TO TNC WRORNF NO .` U OP A CUM TO THi LIFT HAV/F3 A ur*is OF 100.00 r T Tti A CiPerIA.ANOLb .4. OF 32•Ss•7l'AN MC csITANCI OF 17.1 s PUT TO THE MO1ST11 lN[OR Iwo LOT 7 AND •Tel FOOIT OF slr3swe4NO. 1 COWTARSIO 9,124 SOUM1 FUT Oft 0.21 ACAdS IJOP1 OR L1l1. . g • Of O i O tj.: S CD . . • • bMtk .'. • . N I •• tOgIrselds T1s+ • il I••.• ,�ji •.. • '�• EXHIBIT_ A Page 1-1.. a1A` • N. • • • 3607030996 • _r 9603291895 I. • • i • % ‘110Pb.41‘7.-4. : • �••- .. 1 ��� � �.��gawp .-•ice..In•i . _____._,_._ ___;..:_-,e-_..e.-7,.„..._____ _ illIE111111111,21111111111111110r", • WigAirr . .;,...........j tre.or..“ ,........:...--roo • =grr.;l..i4.- • \14'1)- 0 �i .rarn•ro / 1 . `i/. v A,dYpC[1M I ?,...-.1 - : • .s.1 11 ::. / / ' -.i...",:z.—=. / I's\ 1 i• • •,•4...IL.►..s. ..{11 ••,••i.• .3•I -•• • ..... . r 11 - 10 q • .. . EINIIIIIIMIAMI I 11 • . .., ..'.. •::$, . .:4 •.1 . • • •.. • • .0• • • 00, • 00 • • - • =all. - 0 i 0 • • • • . • •• • • • • . . • 1 . i • t • • k• 7 •• .4- •• • • •.• • ..A.Er— • • I• • i... 3. . • .., • e .. • • • 00 • • 4. . %" • .1.1.11MENE9r • • • • . • • • . •• • • • • • • • A I i • •., • 1 k. • • • 4'• 14 ctori • • • . • .'iLg 11 i1M16 00 1 •• • • •::&•••C•.• . • 4 Ill. .1; I1.. •.• . ,. • • d ... 1.0 ., . • a . & CP) • •• . 0 • se • I• li el . lir . . • o . . . • o . . . . 4 e . •. I .......... • C) • I. t . • • . . .. • . . e it * , t It I .. . '1 • . . . I.., • . , .• . i . .. . • 4 , • . • • . r . . • algINPUNI UM it • ,.. 0 I or. ••• . 9 i j• •. 0• toi. I 1 ' ( / •0. .: • ..); .4 I • • •'II . • • ANINIMPLIMIlill"1111111111111111.' • I I • a •' 9 0 .0 i• . .. W.e 0 0 V. .. • • ..- • • 0 • • • :. • . • • • 0 • • . • • 1 • • . . • •• " .-., .,. .....••. • . 0 P •ir toga. ' • Mb 0 • I .• .• EXHIert a , . - -,-- , ... . POPage .M.04 r 1 . - ,., •. . • ,..........,31____ ,i 1 , . .. i‘., *me .. . 9 1 i MTN. P.01.3 '•i'.• ' $ ... ▪ 4 ir;terr.rriftalk-e.I. . . -. . • - • • •. ' . - ' - •:. •'' ...: •: •' .1.1:'cf:4t-Ft...;4.i.A• 4,i-.4 . •-, ..:41T-. ..,1.=:...,.'.:Aut .•-• • •• • • .• ...,. . A • a '�• .T ' POWELL SHORT PLAT MAP r.r LUA-fl7-ISO-sHPL .. LEGEND - CA,., oto. LAID-30-0320 S(C.30. M.13Y., IK(.S(., M.Y. cur or IrEI+FON. KING COUNTY, WASHwuroN •a•, LEGAL DES(3tIPnoNs : DECLARATION �U•• �� I .•/ LOf t .1.0•Ass Mr r1 MY••[S/M 11 M•1 f MI 1..ass,mass > MI. SEE PARCEL A a•r.t•1••aw.11 root•r I oq.S.1•[D o•rMil a M 1••O:••,...:.:si0 - SP 37a-it •1...a•■..�.II ti 0( Or`:..mac•�'� DO't011 mass[•901 I .l p�oro A. e�t 4' DETAIL 'A' _.o r:r:ter'.•.•r nw%.a1 r r1 orr.a• .ao'a r•c.ca•,!Suss,Io•C•3•,raoo•• .s v,w.�4'�• r weMS V(/I.1•I 101Y M•a./.K •1• o. r aN1 I ' / ow.41 >-1 • 1'a.•M. mint•.•MatKS•..• .•OM•f S.Wy.Pl ........M 00 .a art.W o W.1.1 r• •M K 11•[[COMM•M..•CCOO•.rC( O. 411M w.�o'Naarr nt MOMS 014,004.0 SI •0V15.(MW.[ •.1YIr• /rrrOT - ...II Al•1V4a'O•.a r, V.11 ',o 11a -111 --' St m _ now �, r I _ r 11.�..41�n�>rl .�Y�r wwir WC +WW1.. 1 a.1„1•riryi...�w`r'.v1.� •.iri�..•aia o` wti.-�--�� I ]] •a� r++.0011.�s ass............r r.,•. `'„\,`' , _ •.. 0 1 y moo M w or r W mom,/ oo 1 Vr. r t.a[t-(`,...oft 01.��•.r 1 1 • •�••ar `/ moo or try Y R1 V M•a.1 O worm40 N• am.= .10.'. t. 5� I �' , LOT 2 LOT : •.w.� .• / - 6 YK tsuUa••ta�rM•=urlu�+nr• �r..r. _ v...r.I/t/ , •1 ~y.W.a. 7i1, (lW-/•-177-L1/) w••�ra..a�o..ow m.M'a�•�.�i~ •.•+�..r w 11�[.1...r,.<vn .i•u1 a.i`.14 y<`�rate. .mar++- DETI.t 1 t/.� , ac raa•• I _r'_r ama•1.11 lain•a,=1.1 .•n do n•Mi.•r• •.w.0••Y ...J 1 11.0•0 y�1 I or/or•w,1 of we lj•••"a1. ��r r •.a.t, 1 tor 1 J s .•o+.�...r+.•TM. v ,1 a t...• r a FO•00 VT( /[.•a(Ow ..�11..,� o a ..oar ool i am ..s•soma r a oat -�••••••+w /t4R.•LIJM MO•M(/• - .a�,r cm. ...1 0 4 ti•roan u r•I0••n q 000.40.a 1 1] a mo...a r•o. corm/ .•1M 1...................1..r..4. - •L a� 41/•_tJ �1 S '••0 01.-11 R C..••o.W.a o.�•N11 r n n1,Mr.i. _�`}{a_-�i it� i z [ 91 Mao w••p. .M•[CY+ ..[v w Yomr - •r ro•�.irow.rr....•.!r_•_ rla ./ �• > 1 S • tom rV.�'.0 0•cum ..v..ol.M r � ___- . �. r. � � S.7♦D' ` I •a1.r' • . •1W •••tine.r....c woos.=•. 0•e ..... �..r �/r.. ............ r t•�; �Imlay 4�•/ H1aY 1--- - -- -- a•e•0••.'. Ir w et. 00 or Mom' S'•1.S- t r tsar car>1• , .seas • 2 `x 1„,.r,,,F1.M sass.w'0.111✓.1 .Y. eV..r C 6 w,r .a r11 u•a M.uw•win r.,win.. ...1.,rr1l ] • y 40..•MO 1.41• 1.111.••...1. 1.1.0 a.0•. eats QQ�sti9oi3 • ,.,• .0.1• s .41 Ir a.r.�' .••.r .....r_ l v" T 2 -' >1 •....[•••MO...•••••••• Loin 3: "••r moor. t I •./•Vera {�.a,•t 41 wYM;111 M.Mrio M seas.• M ...mar.•.� .1�r; APPROVAL OW S�TM •• O L si•WO.w•a *I. ..•....o .11 ammo... •Or•Sa•t1a a MI R rw1CA.•lo.c/n+ac n1EET sass a••••..I I ( ,•a„ ^j (Ol J '.I.., u1,,=. W.v.r o 41 1:."«e s•.:. •rr•o.to W._tea.aI Ail_--11 Sl oo/r Op ot _�•LLA�/� . / ' \ t- +` f�a . •ow• /. t (tW-II-137-L11) .m Moo moo moo 01 w1.•1.1 .u.• ' M.... - 11qq``� +7 J• ~\,� < , i ao..�c (wool 0 cry 0 11..1.r Moots) I • ' • 7 A; I • •, ,a. II I MAIM a//A//Ooan(,.c :: r' ' ' •k. ��� alaY111.,area•• .•c ,u-1w-,a , • . -' • r--f vo 1.a.... So.1. 1aw••1 w4 1Cwt4 Y1.-IC, I !•• �.` `\ ^.8; Ill ammo r M01,-4N1 ••G C0M11 O1/41001r a•4[SW.1n 1 F.an,n.S(..• tn, I A6 (,»)u7•Hu Comm.w err ore Wm 2/mar r A4y___n1( ,ut.w wio I.r1ro.•no a•.1.1(, I G 3n, LAND SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE 01$Caw„Moms* oi.t,tom C...1,•..«.o n•a•..0 SI)•.Iu-woo•mat c _ 1 I--r rliax• .oar s..o.�-.l...moo...... /t rJC....1. J�,v ..A..r ® I.>•rY.AJ 0 M yW.bW .I maw w<..1.r.w�• A as •r..r. .a MON M•awl,•1• ••• Y • ••• 100 300 >moor Iv1 w IRrNfS .IN/ AEC0900•G NO T -- S r•.a O . Jr . SC..t•a:.tin RECORDER'S CERTWICA1E .... �,( ,.,,w LEGAL DE:CRtvnON : 1,, a.�-.. ••,• .•c..1c C.C .rr/..CC ..•10.•rasa W. w•M ..•1• . H aim.*0..••moo mower•era••1.. OOSTMG/AI411: :,O.. n .I.I.a.,.M. 1 r•r1 w 1Mr ...... sass w.••. - w w.wow.., r.ra• on1•woroo Om.•\AYin. • aga.Nom• lo[ of mar••r M1.a M•..a.M .,• .a•F10 w ,t.n••R1 .sins•.!•• -COO , 41.i�•• 10%0 N•I 4 d•. •..R +11•1.. tins. am••r ra•.r. '�„, ./ ••a>yaw. It I au...man.mac W 1r•r1 N O..w 1 I..•t rr..n r. amain 11•,I,a,.M6r� maw• rnN SHEET I 0l 1 I 95-1°5 (y) i z TERRA ASSOCIATES Inc. '* "' Consultants in Geotechnical Engineering, Geology and Environmental Earth Sciences June 9, 1999 Project No.T-3707-2 PLANNING Mr. Curtis Miller DEvE1-OpMENT NTON Pacific Gulf Properties, Inc. CITY oF RE 4220 Von Karman, Second Floor tin 2 2 1999 Jt Newport Beach, California 92660-2002 RECEIVED Subject: Geotechnical Study Lind Avenue Warehouse Building 3600 Block of Lind Avenue Renton,Washington Reference: Geotechnical Report, Commercial Laundry Facility,prepared by Terra Associates, Inc., dated August 15, 1997 Dear Mr.Miller: As requested, Terra Associates, Inc. has completed a geotechnical study of the subject site. The site is located between the 3600 and 3900 blocks of Lind Avenue in Renton, Washington. A Vicinity Map showing the location of the site is presented as Figure 1. PURPOSE AND SCOPE We previously completed a geotechnical study for the planned construction of a building in the northern portion of the site. Our findings and recommendations are summarized in the referenced geotechnical report. The purpose of this study was to obtain additional subsurface information and provide geotechnical recommendations specific to the design and construction of the currently planned warehouse building. Our scope of work for this project included conducting four electric cone penetration tests (CPTs) at the site and preparing this report. The CPTs obtained detailed soil resistance and pore pressure profiles of the soils encountered beneath the site. Using the CPT and previous test boring data, we performed analyses to develop geotechnical recommendations for project design and construction. 12525 Willows Road, Suite 101, Kirkland, Washington 98034 Phone (425) 821-7777 • Fax (425) 821-4334 • terra@terra-associates.com • Mr. Curtis Miller June 9, 1999 Specifically, this report addresses surface and subsurface conditions, contains the results of our analyses, and provides geotechnical recommendations for the following: • Site preparation and grading • Foundation alternatives • Settlement and liquefaction • Slab-on-grade floors • Lateral earth pressure • Utilities • Pavements • Drainage PROJECT DESCRIPTION Pacific Gulf Properties provided us with a conceptual site plan(Scheme 9A) dated April 20, 1999. Review of the site plan indicated that the subject project will consist of constructing a warehouse building encompassing 100,500 square feet. Loading dock and parking areas will be located along the western and eastern margins of the building. The building floor slab will be constructed at an elevation two feet higher than adjacent parking lot grades. We anticipate that site grades will be raised approximately two feet for parking lot construction. The buildings will be constructed using 24-foot concrete tilt-up wall panels. Perimeter wall loads could approach 4 to 6 kips per foot with interior columns carrying 80 to 100 kips. We expect that floors constructed at dock-high grade could impose loads of 250 to 300 pounds per square foot (psf). Access drive and loading dock areas will likely receive relatively heavy truck traffic loads. The recommendations contained in the following sections of this report are based on our understanding of current design concepts. We should review project drawings to verify that our recommendations have been properly interpreted, and be given the opportunity to develop supplemental recommendations if required. SITE CONDITIONS Surface We conducted a surface reconnaissance at the site on May 27, 1999. The site is located between the 3600 and 3900 blocks of Lind Avenue in Renton, Washington. The site is bordered to the north by an equipment rental facility and to the west by Lind Avenue. A warehouse facility borders the site to the south. A theater complex and home supply store border the site to the east. Paved access roads extend from Lind Avenue eastward along the northern and southern site margins. A railroad spur lies adjacent to the northern property line. Project No. T-3707-2 Page No. 2 Mr. Curtis Miller June 9, 1999 • The flat site is currently open and cleared of primary vegetation. The northern portion of the site consists of a dirt surface. Fill has previously been placed over a small area in the northern part of the site. Fill thickness ranges to a maximum of two feet. The northern part of the central area contained a pile of stumps and debris. No standing water was noted in the site at the time of our visit. Site,vegetation consisted mainly of wild grasses. Assorted shrubs were present along the western property line adjacent to Lind Avenue. Shrubs and small deciduous trees were also located in designated wetland areas in the site's eastern margin. Subsurface On May 19, 1999, our exploration subcontractor, Northwest Cone Exploration, performed four Electric Piezo- Cone Penetration Tests in the proposed building location. The tests were performed to depths ranging from 30.0 to 31.5 feet below existing site grades. The approximate locations of the CPTs are shown on the Exploration Location Plan,Figure 2.' Plots,of the cone data are attached as Figures 3 through 6. Soil logs interpreted from the cone data, along with estimated Standard Penetration Test values (N60), are attached as Figures 7 through 10. Boring logs from our previous field exploration at the site are contained in Figures 11 through 13. The CPT-1 location was pre-drilled through dense fill soils to a depth of six feet in order to facilitate pushing of the cone through the upper, relatively dense layer. The cone and test boring data reveals that fill consisting of loose to dense sand and silty sand underlies the site to depths ranging from 4.5 to 7.5 feet 'A 2.5 to 5,0-foot thick layer of very soft to soft clay and organic clayey silt was encountered beneath the fill in the CPT and boring. locations_ The soft clay and organic silt are underlain.by sand to silty sand to the entire depth of the borings and cone penetration.tests. SPT and cone resistance values indicate the sands are generally medium dense, and become dense with depth: . Pore pressure measurements during cone testing indicate that groundwater is present at a depth of about nine feet below the existing site grades. The test borings showed groundwater at depths of 2.5 to 6.5 feet The Geologic,Map of the Renton Quadrangle, King County, Washington, by D.R. Mullineaux(1965), shows that the soils are mapped as peat(Qlp). ,The native clay and sands'underlying the fill at the site correlate better with the description of the nearby mapped.alluvium(Qaw). GEOLOGIC HAZARDS Seismic The Puget Sound area falls within Seismic Zone 3, as classified by the 1997 Uniform Building Code (UBC). Based on the soil conditions encountered and the local geology, Table 16-J of the 1997 UBC indicates that a soil profile type of SD should be used in structural design. Project No. T-3707-2 Page No. 3 Mr. Curtis Miller June 9, 1999 We reviewed the results of our field investigation and assessed the potential for liquefaction of the site's soils during an earthquake. We conducted a liquefaction analysis as part of our previous study at the site using methods outlined in Ground Motions and Soil Liquefaction During Earthquakes,by Seed and Idriss (1982). Our previous analysis indicated that an approximately five-foot thick layer of medium dense silty sand, observed in Test Boring B-2 at a depth of 12 feet, would probably liquefy under severe earthquake ground motions and moderate ground shaking of significant duration. The cone penetration tests encountered soil layers that have an equal or smaller potential for soil liquefaction than those shown in Boring B-2. Accordingly,our previous liquefaction analysis remains valid for this project's larger site area. As noted in the referenced report, we do not believe building foundations would be subject to a bearing capacity failure resulting from soil liquefaction at the site. However, building settlements of up to one and one-half inches may result upon dissipation of excess pore pressures generated during a seismic event. Erosion The soils encountered at the site consist of Snohomish silt loam (So) as shown on the Soil Conservation Service (SCS)maps of the area. Due to the flat nature of the site, these soils will have a low potential for erosion when exposed. DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS From a geotechnical perspective, it is feasible to construct the warehouse building on the site, provided the recommendations presented in this report are incorporated into the project design and construction. The primary geotechnical design concern at the site is the presence of a 2.5- to 5.0-foot thick layer of compressible soft clay and organic silt. Analysis indicates that, if unmitigated, compression of this layer under the proposed fill and building loads will result in unacceptable levels of building settlements. It will be necessary to induce the settlements prior to construction to mitigate potential settlement-related impacts to the structure. This may be accomplished by surcharging the site with a fill pad placed at least three feet higher than the final building pad elevation. In our opinion, with the implementation of a surcharge program, the building may utilize conventional spread footing foundations and slab-on-grade floors constructed on the existing medium dense to dense fills. As discussed above, ground settlements ranging up to one and one-half inches could result from shaking during a severe earthquake. If spread footings are utilized, the owner must be willing to accept the risk of liquefaction- related settlements occurring at the site and the potential impacts to on-site structures resulting from those settlements. Because the expected settlements due to liquefaction are relatively small, we anticipate that settlement-related impacts to the building constructed with tilt-up panels would include relatively minor cracking in walls and foundations. If the owner is unwilling to accept the risk of the liquefaction-related settlements, the building foundations and floor slabs should be supported on augercast piles. Project No.T-3707-2 Page No. 4 Mr. Curtis Miller June 9,1999 The following sections provide detailed recommendations regarding the above issues and other.geotechnical design considerations. These recommendations should:be incorporated into the final design drawings and construction specifications. We should review the final plans so that we can modify or provide additional recommendations as required. Site Preparation and Grading Following clearing, the fill surface should be proofrolled with heavy construction equipment prior to placement of additional fill. Soft yielding areas should be overexcavated to firm bearing soil and replaced with structural fill. Where excavations to achieve firm conditions are excessive, use of a geotextile fabric such as Mirafi 500X in conjunction with limited overexcavation and replacement with a structural fill may be considered. Typically, 18 inches of clean granular structural fill over the fabric will achieve a stable subgrade. Our previous laboratory test results showed that the existing fill was a few percentage points above its optimum moisture content at the time of our investigation, and that some of the fill contained up to 13 percent fines. These soils may difficult to compact if the moisture conditions cannot be carefully controlled. Care should be taken to ensure..that exposed surfaces of the on-site fill do not become disturbed by construction traffic during wet weather conditions. Because of their moisture sensitivity, the ability to use these soils as structural fill will depend on their moisture content and the prevailing weather conditions at the time of construction. It will be difficult to achieve proper compaction of these soils when their moisture content is above optimum. When the moisture is excessive, the soil can be dried by aeration in order to reach a moisture content that will allow for proper compaction. When properly moisture conditioned, it is our opinion that the existing fills can be used for fill below footings, pavements,and building floor slabs. We recommend that imported structural fill required to achieve site grades consist of inorganic granular soil meeting the following grading requirements: Maximum Aggregate Size 3 inches Maximum passing the No.4 Sieve 75..percent Maximum Passing the No.200 Sieve 25 percent (Based on the Minus 3/4-inch Fraction) (see following narrative) If fill placement takes place during wet weather or if the moisture conditions of the fill material cannot be controlled,we recommend importing fill soil that conforms with the above gradation, but with the maximum amount passing the No.200 sieve reduced to five percent. Project No.T-3707-2 Page No.5 Mr. Curtis Miller June 9, 1999 Structural fill materials should be placed in uniform loose layers not exceeding 12 inches and compacted to a minimum of 95 percent of the soil's maximum density, as determined by ASTM Test Designation D-698 (Standard Proctor). The moisture content of the soil at the time of compaction should be within two percent of its optimum, as determined by this ASTM method. Prior to constructing foundations and floor slabs, we recommend that a Terra Associates representative be on-site to probe or observe proofrolling of the subgrade to determine if any isolated soft or yielding areas are present. Soft or yielding areas should be overexcavated and filled to grade with structural fill or crushed rock. Surcharge and Settlements As discussed, for spread footing foundation support and slab-on-grade construction, we recommend placing a surcharge fill pad over the building area. We do not believe it is necessary to place a surcharge of fill within the parking and access easement areas. However, we recommend that the structural fill required in the pavement areas be placed as soon as possible to allow time for consolidation of the compressible layers and reduction of potential settlement impacts on pavement and utilities. The site grades should be raised with structural fill placed and compacted as outlined in the Site Preparation and Grading section. Once final building grade is achieved, an additional three feet of fill should be.placed as a surcharge. This surcharge fill does not need to meet any special requirements other than having a minimum in- place unit weight of 120 pounds per cubic foot(pcf). However,it is advisable to use a good quality fill to raise grades in other portions of the site,such as parking and driveway areas, if necessary. We recommend extending the surcharge pad a minimum of five feet beyond the building perimeter, and then it should slope down at an inclination of 1:1 (Horizontal:Vertical). The estimated total primary settlements under the recommended surcharge range from four to ten inches across the building area. These settlements are expected to occur 8 to 12 weeks following full application of the surcharge loading. The actual period for completion and magnitude of the primary settlements will be governed by variations in subsurface conditions at the site. The rate of consolidation can be accelerated by installing sand or wick drains at regularly spaced intervals throughout the pre-load fill pad. Alternatively, an additional thickness of fill surcharge will accelerate the rate of primary settlement. Terra Associates,Inc.can provide specific recommendations for either option if acceleration of the surcharge settlement period is desired. To verify the amount of settlement and the rate of movement, the surcharge program should be monitored by installing settlement markers. A typical settlement marker installation is shown on Figure 14. The settlement markers should be installed on the existing grade prior to placing any building or surcharge fills. Once installed, baseline elevations should be obtained with subsequent readings of both the fill height and marker obtained every two days until the full height of the surcharge is in place. Once fully surcharged, readings should continue weekly until the anticipated settlements have occurred. Project No.T-3707-2 Page No. 6 • • • , Mr. Curtis Miller June 9, 1999 It is critical that the grading contractor recognizes the importance,of the settlement marker installations. All efforts must be made to protect the markers from damage during fill placement. It is difficult, if not impossible, to evaluate the progress of the surcharge program if.the markers are damaged or destroyed by construction equipment. As a result, it may be necessary to install new markers and to extend the surcharging time to ensure that settlements have ceased and building construction can begin. Building foundations may be constructed at final elevations upon completion of the surcharge program. The geotechnical engineer should review the settlement monitoring data to. verify that primary, settlements are completed prior to foundation construction. We estimate that post-construction settlements under building loads will range to a total of one inch, of which three-fourth inch will be,differential in nature. The majority of these settlements-will occur as the building loads are applied during construction. These settlements will occur independently of the potential liquefaction settlements previously discussed: Foundations The building may be supported on conventional spread footing foundations bearing on structural fill placed and compacted as recommended in the Site. Grading and Preparation section. We recommend that a.minimum thickness of four feet of existing compacted fill or structural fill be present below the footing construction. Perimeter foundations exposed to the weather should be at a minimum depth of 1.5 feet below final exterior grades. We recommend designing foundations for a net allowable bearing capacity of 3,000 psf For short-term loads, such as wind and seismic, a one-third increase in this allowable capacity can be used in structural design. For designing the structure's foundations to resist lateral loads, a base friction coefficient of 0.4 can be used: Passive earth pressures acting on the side of the'footing and buried portion of the foundation stem wall should also be considered for resisting lateral loads. We recommend calculating this lateral resistance using an equivalent fluid weight of 350 pcf. At perimeter locations, we recommend not including the upper 12 inches of soil in this computation because they can be affected by weather or disturbed by future grading activity.: This value assumes the foundation will be constructed neat against competent fill soil or backfilled with structural fill as described in the Site Preparation and Grading section. The recommended lateral resistance value includes a safety factor of1.5. Slab-on-Grade Floors With site preparation completed as described in the Site Preparation and Grading section,new structural fill soils should be suitable for supporting slab-on-grade construction. With the anticipated floor loads, we estimate that floor slab settlement due to'imposed static loads will,range from one-fourth to one-half inch. ,The floor movements should be entirely differential with respect to the foundation construction. For slab thickness design with respect to floor deflection due to point loadings,a subgrade modulus of 300 pounds per cubic inch(pci)may be used. Project No.T-3707-2 • Page.No. 7 Mr. Curtis Miller June 9, 1999 We recommend placing a capillary break layer immediately below the floor slabs. The capillary break layer should consist of four-inches of clean, free-draining sand or gravel which has less than three percent by weight of material passing the No. 200 sieve. This layer will guard against wetting of the floor slab due to the underlying soil conditions. Where moisture via vapor transmission is not desired, a polyethylene vapor barrier should be placed on the capillary break layer. To aid in uniform curing of the concrete, we recommend placing two inches of clean uniform sand on the vapor barrier. Lateral Earth Pressures The magnitude of earth pressure development on cantilevered (unrestrained) or restrained retaining walls will partly depend on the quality of the wall backfill. We recommend placing and compacting wall backfill as structural fill. Below improved areas, such as pavements or floor slabs, the backfill should be compacted to a minimum of 95 percent of its maximum dry unit weight, as determined by ASTM Test Designation D-698 (Standard Proctor). In unimproved areas, the relative compaction can be reduced to 90 percent. To guard against hydrostatic pressure development, wall drainage should also be installed. A wall drainage detail showing drainage installation is given on Figure 15. With wall backfill placed and compacted as recommended and drainage properly installed, we suggest designing unrestrained walls for an active earth pressure equivalent to a fluid weighing 35 pcf for horizontal backfill. An at-rest earth pressure equivalent to a fluid weighing 50 pcf may be used in design of restrained walls. The above earth pressure values assume that no other surcharge loading, such as traffic, adjacent buildings, or soil back slopes, will act on the wall. If such conditions will exist, the imposed loading should be included in the wall design. Friction at the base of wall foundations and passive earth pressure will provide resistance to lateral loads. These values are contained in the Foundations section of this report. Draina!e Surface Surface gradients should be created to direct runoff away from the building, and should drain towards suitable discharge facilities. With the exception of paved areas adjacent to the structure, we recommend providing a gradient of at least three percent for a minimum distance of ten feet from the building perimeters. In paved areas adjacent to the building,a minimum gradient of one percent should be provided, unless provisions are included for collection and disposal of surface water adjacent to the structure. Subsurface We recommend installing a continuous subsurface drain along the outside lower edge of the perimeter building foundations where landscaped areas are located adjacent to the structure. In our opinion, perimeter footing drains will not be required where paved areas extend to the edge of the building, or if floor slab elevations are higher than the adjacent outside grades. Project No.T-3707-2 Page No. 8 Mr. Curtis Miller June 9, 1999 The foundation drains and roof downspouts should be tightlined separately to an approved discharge facility. Subsurface drains must be laid with a gradient sufficient to promote positive flow to a controlled point of approved discharge. Utilities Where utility lines are to be excavated and installed in the paved areas, we recommend placing all bedding and backfill in accordance with APWA and all applicable local and state specifications. As a minimum, backfill placement and compaction should be in accordance with the recommendations given in the Site Preparation and Grading section of this report. Where utilities will occur below unimproved areas, the degree of compaction can be reduced to a minimum of 90 percent of the soil's maximum density as determined by the referenced ASTM standard. Because of the potential for long-term settlements, utility pipe joints and connections should be flexible and allow for up to one inch of differential movement. Pavements Suitable support for pavement construction will be provided by subgrade soils prepared as described in the Site Preparation and Grading section. Regardless of the obtained compaction results, subgrades must be in a stable non-yielding condition prior to paving. Immediately prior to paving, the area of the subgrade should be proofrolled with heavy construction equipment to verify this condition. The required pavement thickness is not only dependent upon the supporting capability of the subgrade soils, but also on the traffic loading conditions that will be applied. For light commercial vehicles and typical passenger vehicle traffic,the following pavement sections are recommended: • Two inches of asphalt concrete(AC) over six inches of crushed rock base (CRB) • Two inches of AC over four inches of asphalt treated base (ATB) For heavy truck traffic areas, we recommend the following pavement sections: • Three inches of AC over six inches of CRB • Three inches of AC over four inches of ATB If there is a potential for pavement construction to be delayed until the wet winter months, the subgrade soils must consist of a clean granular material (wet weather fill) as described in the Site Preparation and Grading section. In addition, we strongly suggest that the subgrade be further protected by placing a layer of ATB, on which construction traffic could access the project without excessively disturbing the subgrade soils. The ATB thickness should be four inches for this purpose. Repair of failed ATB areas should be anticipated prior to final paving. However, the overall integrity of the subgrade soils will be considerably less impacted if this protection is provided. Project No.T-3707-2 Page No. 9 Mr.Curtis Miller June 9, 1999 Over time, some longitudinal and transverse cracking of the pavement should be expected. Cracks in the pavement should be sealed in a timely fashion to prevent excessive surface water infiltration into the subgrade soils and degrading their supporting capabilities. ADDITIONAL SERVICES Terra Associates, Inc., should review the final design drawings and specifications in order to verify that our earthwork and foundation recommendations have been properly interpreted and incorporated into project design and construction. We should also provide geotechnical services during construction in order to observe compliance with the design concepts, specifications, and recommendations. This will also allow for design changes if subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated prior to the start of construction. LIMITATIONS We prepared this report in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering practices. This report is the property of Terra Associates, Inc. and is intended for specific application to the Lind Avenue Warehouse Building project in Renton, Washington. This report is for the exclusive use of Pacific Gulf Properties,Inc. and their authorized representatives. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. The analyses and recommendations presented in this report are based upon data obtained from the test borings drilled on-site. Variations in soil conditions can occur, the nature and extent of which may not become evident until construction. If variations appear evident, Terra Associates, Inc. should be requested to re-evaluate the recommendations in this report prior to proceeding with construction. We appreciate the opportunity to provide geotechnical services to you on this project. We trust the information presented is sufficient for your current needs. If you have any questions or require additional information,please call. - P`j Sincerely ; ,,o�WAS �*f' TERRA ` e` ,i . I t << Kevin P.R ii 4 o a e q '47'k, Project Engi ' .�•�'In* - -013.- fr 7 ty r r►"�l,,,31r yi; ' ssr Theodore J. Schepper,P.E. Principal Engineer Encl: Figure 1 -Vicinity Map Figure 2 -Exploration Location Plan Figures 3 through 6—Cone Penetration Test Logs Figures 7 through 10—CPT Soil Logs Figures 11 through 13—Test Boring Logs Figure 14—Typical Settlement Marker Detail Figure 15—Retaining Wall Drainage Detail Project No.T-3707-2 Page No. 10 q DEIy�} a\ .i I I SW 5 ;tram ynua zR ��.. ,uuao 1 •b s' ti .. ` p)44' :`' 4 5T ,n WV 1 CENTER / PNK ' al •`i_% :$�Syll. 1' G� ■ S RE NTON VILLAGE PL y,, \ NTO N• - CLINT; � ST BG f_ \`` \N. ZY �•�,t vilitivid INN N 5 cost 40,r I. . : gg l51• 5T '4f \ s \.\ �N — g" �I z / 8 Sye 0Y• �w` - - — � ! — F. �. , �\ r ,s,,,, T4I15"—� ( .'�.a ATi�JYic,611 i' 20 S `e SW IO , - `¢��15TN -4 .t ' p ST < ST _- IntA 1. I S 16TH STI S illpEC00.- ,� iB r��ycfoi 3 m isHim..,II < 5T 14•.� - -. �q -SW 19TH ST i 19 v v,, PI sr 0 :•MS I o � £ I "ST b srAt50T , w1 1\ \ Y C 1� "a"c' S 20) n A101,ttc 9 S 7 emu' P KWY : an '< _if vARx 11 P 'P�* Ors I ceEu " sr "zlsr s UGET z ce eacEy I ` e RD I.P 'F Y si! BAKER a 1 VI I I SW 23RD ST- S_23RO N ST 1 �. / T / ' Y ' a. r pp M ' P'rr MID • J r 1 T ^� '` ,' ' ' NTON ,P K ITH - �� .l3s iP.,. Fr:�s" z. I5 .2rTH STa E 11 1 1 \N 1 e,f- , <e5 S»rx-sr 1 'EAT R i TRECK 1NOpf • 'S Pt-�2,1, 9q>1 ,y.:R , e E s TRECK \ ! T I 0 N 4,-,..Tai 'WETUNOS Y� ," me" `N \ .E 166TN:_sE a»nTij sr < ^v,, 1 ,r W 29TH ST . •>{`. pK.f'+S oT n '• u ST s E 1! S \ v 2fAI ■ / REN77M' I 4;"; / i -G\, Tp`Y` a I . - g, au t WETLANDS. S T E r � R, _ <'`Z9o, \ -- i1IT _ •a. W .....I s 4'; a1 Pl , _ ��. _ SE I)0`. S \ u- 101111 y ANTHER. ei RA `1 �_ � 3dTH ST 5 �•�. SE 1 2H0'� 3TTPST S ,.., SE 17.0H 7,7\ 4 BLVD ' I J:II SW Sy a aF -d 1 CREEq g �S S D oa M A'OSST23 ^ 3 1 �$ TITr y �' IB `PS Ts _ J� OF SECR./ 1 RI LLA < � - ' Q, � N x IR 1/ i�' S 1) p, nlLp 6.,:i.ar -a'a e e 1 ®��14� ^' �� '_i o �.. a- SE ma 1� W`43RD y `ST / Q"0 7` \!s STtuaR Pn) �I ? Leon sE sE 1e TH I;, H z `SW 1 J® 3 ' �® S 43RD �I w W a c H g '' tern 1 (SE 180TH ST) 1 IfiiT`S 9•��.G' Yam. -) tE tef4 e1 1 I. / c�� ayr sr SE=< �Ilk.RIVERS! s 1BZN0 65. FABFLT' � <'/ •� � `;-4�� }- g s�, g I ki y D• i ST S 1B2ND ST 6O' �'1 L)J ElI -■ s 45TH x +;c t _'2 •cd •�32 to * SE It a I a` Tom..¢•< •In s` 184TH ST ,o! 1�' 7 ,d'�c 3- - iA x A 184TN C i SE I&)H_ 1 BLn I5T ,: -Po;:}K IT ' , ' , I', r SE 4' d SE 6, c S 186TH ST. vs N 1 Z:!T _ _��:.E,�i _ 11ii11�ST B ��J' /FMsE lain S S 1B8TH ST. / z -',1 , C. ST _Z. ') --— ® 1 sEleeHw R 515 cot( s�r1S 190TH 5800 190TH ST S 190TH ST f- CT T SE <9onlc emu' .is a,a soT1 L y. 2,.... ;:1 19eM Si ---� SE 1901M K __ S_ 1192ND _ ST __ _ 1<I 1.2ND sr I 're 19o1H 0' 2< S 2ND ST S SSTH T F I92ND- ^ST SE 3I gc„ .,.../ xi ST I --'I ^1 �: s . SW 194TH ST 2j SW 194TH ST . _ "ildlik... l9.H a mm P �, ae n Mall =1 ! I $T I -' S 196TH ST S 196TH ST ...,s..1 L ) L SE 1 6TN iI 5T SE I '< I i 1 500 n N'" I y S S 198TH ST T�4y•, d„1 SPRINOIBRo3k > I< Ni c <198TH ST 5Z119BTN ST. v,r-7- s i s19e I SE 31 ,S 200TH' 5 ml 200TH ST < ,, S 6 * 200TH 8 -ST }, ^Ij $ :�ixl SE ST 1 200TH Si ST N N a z:i'" • 9800 _ " :�� $ *` x W I g,� 55 ti D tt „S S 202ND ST I , • i..5T. SPi 202N0 ST .,.0 0 i)�I >. s ti € ----- 1 1 ,a 20JRD"; : 203RD ST..I g i w"IIP li 2004 H ST <I. 2 3 <I ' <I 91-1 .1 —_. SE`I=i"I aB04THg.1 cr. .1 REFERENCE: THE THOMAS GUIDE, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, PAGES 655, 656, 685 AND 686, 1999 EDITION. VICINITY MAP mess TERRA LIND AVENUE WAREHOUSE BUILDING si ASSOCIATES RENTON, WASHINGTON • Geotechnical Consultants Proj.No. 3707-2 Date JUNE 1999 Figure 1 _9.C_ RIoa.II • " 1 w 9,. -. _'r 2�' • —wso — •�I�lil . A9R.T il\ 1 9� �' 1 nly' I ILitt, I \I -- �an�a aT ^.O.N iNIRARY..,, , 1 X10 11 11R0 MDIUC SW .III \ CONCRETE / , 9U10910 TI fM 1 SpU N I', PW-15.3] i 1 0 - m 1- ^-'I R91.16.73— ! iiJ ' ` _ - � `)'`�\ SCUD.U0-192{ �w-,,.75 , frI CII111kr1-1‘ kii„ \ 1ER OWL/IY nORO I `11g11`Ig 1� II11 1 ,11111-1 IllI111l II , .` X2 1llll i I111_K_�1,{, �`t- ;_ I - \ , sN . =i l i I 1,, I i '„ ^ PARCEL A 1 i i, ,,` A9M.1T SP 378-79 7innki- 111 If; II wATEA APPROXIII QVALITV PO 1 00 OlIO LEGEND: -$- APPROXIMATE - APPROXIMATE REFERENCE: BASE PLAN PREPAR EXPLORATION LOCATION PLAN DENNIS & ASSOCIA1 LIND AVENUE WAREHOUSE BUILDING 1 OF 1, DATED 5/: RENTON, WASHINGTON DRIVEWAY PER SITE CLIENT, DATED 4/2( Proj.No. 3707-2 Date JUNE 1999 Figure 2 • Cone Penetration Test - CPT-1 Test Date:May 19,1999 Operator :Northwest Cone Exploration Ground Surf.Elev.:0.00 Location :Pacific Gulf Properties Site:Lind Avenue This test probe predrilled to 6 feet through sandy gravel fill Water Table Depth:9.00 Qt(tsf) Fr. Ratio(%) PWP(tsf) Ic N60 (blows/ft) 00 60 120 180 240 300 0 1 2 3 4 5 -1 0 1' 2 3 4 1.0 1.6 2.2 2.8 3.4 4.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 - 3 Mir 12 00 .o w � 15 I _c 18 21 1 24 27 30 Qt normalized for Fr Rots 100'Ff(Qt•Sigmav) After leffedea and Davies(1991) After 1efferies and Davies(1993) unequal end area effects Gamma z 120.3 pcf - Ic<1.25•Gravelly sands 1.25<Ic<1.90-Clean to silty sand 1.90<lc<2.54•Silty sand to sandy silt 2.54<Ic<2.82•Clayey silt to silty clay 2.82<Ic<3.22-Clays PROJECT NO.3707-1 DATE:May 20,1999 DRAWN BY:Keith Brown Terra Associates, Inc. FIGURE 3 Cone Penetration Test - CPT-2 Test Date:May 19,1999 Operator :Northwest Cone Exploration Ground Surf.Elev.:0.00 Location :Pacific Gulf Properties Site:Lind Avenue Dissipation test performed at 8.5 feet in clayey silt Water Table Depth:9.00 Qt(tsf) Fr. Ratio(%) PWP (tsf) Ic N60 (blows/ft) 0 60 120 180 240 300 0 1 2 3 4 5 -1 0 1 2 3 4 1.0 1.6 2.2 2.8 3.4 4.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 0 3 -) ' 4'. 9 — c 12 be W m c 15 'EL [ o S 18 • 21 24 27 \ t . • 30 Qt,wnoslized for Fr Ratio=100'F/(Qt-Sigmav) After Jelleries and Davies(1991) After Jefferiea and Davies(1993) unequal end area effects Gamma=120.3 pcf Ic<1.25-Gravelly sands 1.25<Ic<1.90-Clean to silty sand 1.90<Ic<2.54-Silty sand to sandy silt 2.54<Ic<2.82-Clayey silt to silty clay 2.82<Ic<3.22-Clays PROJECT NO.3707-1 DATE:May 20,1999 DRAWN BY:Keith Brown Terra Associates, Inc. FIGURE 4 Cone Penetration Test - CPT-3 Test Date:May 19,1999 Operator :Northwest Cone Exploration Ground Surf.Elev.:0.00 • Location :Pacific Gulf Properties Site:Lind Avenue Water Table Depth:9.00 Qt(tsf) Fr. Ratio (%) PWP (tsf) Ic N60(blows/ft) 0 60 120 180 240 300 0 1 2 3 4 5 -1 0 1 2 3 4 1.0 1.6 2.2 2.8 3.4 4.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 3 C.--'" ' . 9 I - -----"-.-.-% 12 to 15 a. 18 21 24 27 30 Qt normalized for Fr Ratio=100'F/(Qt-Sigmav)- After Jeffenes and Davies(1991) After Jetlerin and Davies(1993)unequal end end area effects Gamma=120.3 pcf Ic<1.25-Gravelly sands - 1.25<Ic<1.90-Clean to silty sand 1.90<lc c 2.54-Silty sand to sandy silt 2.54<le<2.82-Clayey milt to silty clay 2.82<Ic<3.22-Clays PROJECT NO.3707-1 DATE:May 20,1999 . DRAWN BY:Keith Brown Terra Associates, Inc. FIGURE 5 • Cone Penetration Test - CPT-4 Test Date:May 19,1999 Operator :Northwest Cone Exploration Ground Surf.Elev.:0.00 Location :Pacific Gulf Properties Site:Lind Avenue Water Table Depth:9.00 Qt(tsf) Fr. Ratio(%) PWP(tsf) Ic N60 (blows/ft) 00 60 120 180 240 300 0 1 2 3 4 5 -1 0 1 2 3 4 1.0 1.6 2.2 2.8 3.4 4.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 3 12 1111 oa c 15 t 0. m 18 21 _ 24 27 30 Qt normalized for Fr Ratio=I00'F/(Qt-Sigmav) -After Jeffedes and Davies(1991) After Jefferie,and Davies(1993) unequal end area effects Gamma=120.3 pcf Ic<1.25-Gravelly sands 1.25<Ic<1.90-Clean to silty sand 1.90<lc<2.54-Silty sand to sandy silt 2.54<Ic<2.82-Clayey silt to silty clay 2.82<Ic<3.22-Clays PROJECT NO.3707-1 DATE:May 20,1999 DRAWN BY:Keith Brown Terra Associates, Inc. FIGURE 6 CPT-1 Soil Log Logged by: NWC Date: 5/19/99 Approximate Elev. 17' Consistency/ a Estimated Moisture Soil Classification Relative Depth E N60 Content Density (ft.) P (%) Pre-drilled to 6 feet. No CPT data. - _ 5 Silty sand to sandy silt. Loose 2 Clay. Very Soft - 1 Sand to silty sand. — 10 6 Medium - Dense - 16 — 15 14 Gravelly sand. - 24 Medium —20 23 Dense - 23 Sand to silty sand. -25 29 Dense _ 34 —30 32 Terminated at 31.5 feet. Groundwater indicated at 9 feet. CPT SOIL LOG TERRA LIND AVENUE WAREHOUSE BUILDING t ��`niallm ASSOCIATES RENTON, WASHINGTON Geotechnical Consultants Proj. No. T-3707-2 Date JUNE 1999 Figure 7 CPT-2 Soil Log Logged by: NWC Date: 5/19/99 Approximate Elev. 17' Consistency/ EEstimated Moisture Soil Classification Relative Depth E N. Content Density (ft.) in (%) FILL; sand to sandy silt. - 12 Medium - Dense 25 5 9 Clayey silt to clay. Very - Soft _ 2 Sand to silty sand. — 10 11 14 — 15 13 Medium _ Dense - 15 —20 17 26 —25 26 Dense - 34 30 32 Terminated at 30.5 feet. Groundwater indicated at 9 feet. CPT SOIL LOG TERRA LIND AVENUE WAREHOUSE BUILDING 1 ���`` ` ASSOCIATES RENTON, WASHINGTON Geotechnical Consultants Proj. No. T-3707-2 Date JUNE 1999 Figure 8 • CPT-3 Soil Log Logged by: NWC Date: 5/19/99 Approximate Elev. 17' Consistency/ a Estimated Moisture Soil Classification Relative Depth E Nso Content Density (ft.) (2 (%) Sand to silty sand. Medium Dense - 3 to - Dense - 44 — 5 24 Loose - 3 Clayey silt to clay. Soft - _ 10 2 Sand to silty sand. Loose _ 5 Gravelly sand. — 15 24 Medium Dense - to - Dense - 29 —20 30 25 —25 26 Sand to silty sand. Medium Dense to 28 Dense - -30 30 Terminated at 31 feet. Groundwater indicated at 9 feet. CPT SOIL LOG immTERRA LIND AVENUE WAREHOUSE BUILDING 6 ��` ASSOCIATES RENTON, WASHINGTON Geotechnical Consultants Proj. No. T-3707-2 Date JUNE 1999 Figure 9 CPT-4 Soil Log Logged by: NWC Date: 5/19/99 Approximate Elev. 16' Consistency/ a Estimated Moisture Soil Classification Relative Depth E N60 Content Density (ft.) (%) FILL; gravelly sand to sandy silt. 7 Loose - Dense - 30 - Loose 5 3 Clayey silt to clay. _ Soft _ 3 Sand to gravelly sand. — 10 5 24 —15 17 Medium _ Dense _ 25 —20 21 20 —25 24 Sand to silty sand. - Medium - Dense - 28 Terminated at 30 feet. Groundwater indicated at 9 feet. CPT SOIL LOG mossTERRA LIND AVENUE WAREHOUSE BUILDING t ��``\\" ASSOCIATES RENTON, WASHINGTON Geotechnical Consultants Proj. No. T-3707-2 Date JUNE 1999 Figure 10 Boring No. B-1 Logged by: KPR Date: 7/17/97 Approximate Elev. Consistency/ a (N) Moisture Soil Description Relative Depth E Blows/ Content Notes Density (ft.) ft. (%) Fill;gray-brown silty medium SAND with Sampled cuttings some gravel,moist. (SM) Medium dense - Fill;brown medium SAND with silt and some 18 5.6 gravel,medium dense, moist. (SP-SM) - 1 Becomes water-bearing at 4.5 feet — 5 Loose _ I 4 9.0 Gray organic clayey SILT with peat fibers, saturated, low plasticity. (OH) Very soft 2 72.0 Pp<0.25 tsf LL=55 — 10 PL=32 Black silty fine SAND, saturated. (SM) Medium dense - PI =23 10 28.1 Black fine SAND with silt,water-bearing. 20 27.0 (SP-SM) Medium dense _ - 15 • Black silty fine SAND with interbeds of fine Medium dense 23 31.0 black sand,water-bearing. (SM/SP) -20 Black silty fine SAND interbedded with layers of black fine to medium sand,water- Dense - 30 32.0 bearing. (SM/SP) _ —25 _ Three feet of sand Black fine to medium SAND,water-bearing. heave at 27 feet. (SP) Dense 35 26.6 Flushed with water. Test boring terminated at 29 feet. Groundwater seepage encountered at 4.5 feet. Hole plugged with two bags of bentonite chips mixed with cuttings. BORING LOG TERRA COMMERCIAL LAUNDRY FACILITY tosfr ASSOCIATES RENTON, WASHINGTON Geotechnical Consultants Proj. No. T-3707 Date AUG 1997 Figure 11 Boring No. B-2 Logged by: KPR Date: 7/17/97 Approximate Elev. Consistency/ a (N) Moisture Soil Description Relative Depth E Blows/ Content Notes Density (ft.) ci ft. (%) Fill;brown fine to medium SAND with silt and gravel fill cuttings at surface, moist. (SP-SM) _ Fill;brown fine to medium SAND with silt Medium dense - IF 24 8.5 and some gravel, moist to wet. (SP-SM) Dark gray-brown organic silty CLAY, — 5 Pp= 1.0 tsf fractured to 5.5 feet,wet, low plasticity. Medium stiff _ 5 51.2 (OL/CL) Pp<0.25 tsf Gray organic clayey SILT with peat fibers, DD=70.5 pcf saturated, low plasticity. (OL) Soft LL=41 Black silty fine SAND,saturated. (SM) Loose 5 67.3 FL=31 r 33.1 PI= 10 Dark brown-gray silty very fine SAND with — 10 if interbeds of non-plastic sandy silt,saturated. Medium dense _ 10 27.8 (SM/ML) Dark brown-gray silty very fine SAND, 10 27.5 saturated. (SM) Medium dense _ — 15 15 32.5 Black silty fine SAND,saturated. (SM) Medium dense - _20 Drills denser Black fine to medium SAND interbedded with layers of dark gray-brown, non-plastic Very dense 53 27.3 sandy SILT,water-bearing. (SP/SM) —25 Black fine SAND with silt,wood fragment at 1.5 feet of sand Dense heave at 27 feet 28 feet,water-bearing. (SP-SM) 46 26.7 Test boring terminated at 29 feet. Groundwater seepage encountered at 6.5 feet. Hole plugged with two bags of bentonite chips mixed with cuttings. BORING LOG TERRA COMMERCIAL LAUNDRY FACILITY t ��` ` ASSOCIATES RENTON, WASHINGTON Geotechnical Consultants Proj. No. T-3707 Date AUG 1997 Figure 12 • Boring No. B-3 Logged by: KPR Date: 7/17/97 Approximate Elev. Consistency/ a (N) Moisture Soil Description Relative Depth E Blows/ Content Notes Density (ft ) ft. (/o) Fill;brown silty fine SAND with gravel _ cuttings at surface, moist. (SM) Fill; gray silty medium sand with gravel, Medium dense _ _saturated. (SM) IF 17 14.4 Fill;gray medium SAND with silt and gravel, Loose — 5 12.9 water-bearing. (SP-SM) _ 8 52.0 Dark brown organic clayey SILT with peat Medium stiff fibers,fractured,saturated. (OL) Pp<0.25 tsf Brown, organic SILT with wood Very soft 1 94.1 DD=27.8 pcf fragments and peat fibers,wet, low _ plasticity. (OL) As above, but non-plastic. (OL) Very soft — 1 0 5 22.6 Black,silty,fine to medium SAND, saturated (SM..00se _ • Black medium SAND,water-bearing. (SP) Dense 34 25.1 — 15 Sand heave into auger at 17 feet. Black medium SAND,water-bearing. (SP) Very dense _ 62 29.4 Flushed with water. —20 74,* As above. (SP) Very dense 10 12.8 —25 As above. (SP) Dense 40 32.8 Test boring terminated at 29 feet. Groundwater seepage encountered at 2.5 feet. Hole plugged with 2 bags of bentonite chips mixed with cuttings. * Erroneously high value due to heave filling sampler prior to drive. BORING LOG mumTERRA COMMERCIAL LAUNDRY FACILITY 6 ���` ASSOCIATES RENTON, WASHINGTON Geotechnical Consultants Proj. No. T-3707 Date AUG 1997 Figure 13 STEEL ROD PROTECTIVE SLEEVE • r r r r r • • HEIGHT VARIES ; r •• • • • • • SURCHARGE .. (SEE NOTES) ..• .. SURCHARGE •: OR FILL : OR FILL • .. : r I W NOT TO SCALE NOTES: 1. BASE CONSISTS OF 1/2" THICK, 2'x2' PLYWOOD WITH CENTER DRILLED 5/8" DIAMETER HOLE. 2. BEDDING MATERIAL, IF REQUIRED, SHOULD CONSIST OF CLEAN COARSE SAND. 3. MARKER ROD IS 1/2" DIAMETER STEEL ROD THREADED AT BOTH ENDS. 4. MARKER ROD IS ATTACHED TO BASE BY NUT AND WASHER ON EACH SIDE OF BASE. 5. PROTECTIVE SLEEVE SURROUNDING MARKER ROD SHOULD CONSIST OF 2" DIAMETER PLASTIC TUBING. SLEEVE IS NOT ATTACHED TO ROD OR BASE. 6. ADDITIONAL SECTIONS OF STEEL ROD CAN BE CONNECTED WITH THREADED COUPLINGS. 7. ADDITIONAL SECTIONS OF PLASTIC PROTECTIVE SLEEVE CAN BE CONNECTED WITH PRESS—FIT PLASTIC COUPLINGS. 8. STEEL MARKER ROD SHOULD EXTEND AT LEAST 6" ABOVE TOP OF PLASTIC PROTECTIVE SLEEVE. 9. STEEL MARKER ROD SHOULD EXTEND AT LEAST 1" ABOVE TOP OF FILL SURFACE. TYPICAL SLI I LEMENT MARKER DETAIL TERRA LIND AVENUE WAREHOUSE BUILDING hiseums ASSOCIATES RENTON, WASHINGTON Geotechnical Consultants Proj.No. 3707-2 Date JUNE 1999 Figure 14 12" MINIMUM WIDE FREE—DRAINING GRAVEL SLOPE TO DRAIN \\Vii: •• .:. ... .:. ..... •: • . ... . .: ... . . .,. .. .... _ sz, . . . . . .. ...• . .. ... ... . ...,. . .... ... ....•• _ 7 EXCAVATED SLOPE Vil; . • •' ' . .. _ (SEE REPORT FOR APPROPRIATE • ._ INCLINATIONS) ‘44.4 _i= COMPACTED STRUCTURAL kliiii • • .•••.. .. ..•. • •••• . .:. ,. BACKFILL Viik:•! ....v.e.---...:,10:;...;.• -......,;,. ..•_ 7 ,A A A, A .\ s N , 11140‘xxV(74:1Ratiakt:Ztit:Ii: . I ' "% �% ." .. \,, 12 OVER THE PIPE 4 DIAMETER PVC 3" BELOW THE PIPE PERFORATED PIPE NOT TO SCALE RETAINING WALL DRAINAGE DETAIL .,.,••:.K``. ".. TERRA LIND AVENUE WAREHOUSE BUILDING `• • • ASSOCIATES RENTON, WASHINGTON • Geotechnical Consultants Proj.No. 3707-2 Date JUNE 1999 Figure 15 6t6HOS ((1) PACIFIC GULF WAREHOUSE PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT City of Renton, Washington Prepared for: Treece & Company, Inc. Engineering and Development Consultants 320 Second Ave. South, Suite 200 Kirkland, WA 98033 Prepared By: �opM Nicole E. McWhirter cin'oRE-FAr f�f JfvG �,v Reviewed By: 'Mt 2 2 l9gg Barton G. Treece, Jr., P.E. RACE//EQ G• 'FRE,. r po �© O� WAS ETERSON .x w ,at 4,,.' CONSULTING JarH fly 0 ENGINEERS )? 27505 'c) act L6,-PIS T V*v 67 320 SECOND AVENUE SOUTH sZonAi,Er {'�� KIRKLAND, WASHINGTON 98033 OFFICE(425)827-5874 FAX(425)822-7216 EEXP RES 5/2/0 July 20, 1999 PCE Job No. TREC-0019 1 Page 1 of 2 King County Building and Land Development Division TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET • PART 1 PROJECT OWNER AND - 'PART 2 PROJECT LOCATION PROJECT ENGINEER AND DESCRIPTION , Project Owner Old�Lt,- '�'0(z ItLP► Project Name I f'\CAS'1C, CbULE 1NAR6NDa Address Location oZ311l Phone -! \ Township Project Engineer 1D1C--mescE Range 5E 30 Company TRt C CoM �N P = Section Project Size `7.39 AC Address Phone 390 ter:cci,su Upstream Drainage Basin Size AC ram . 9 17 00- 3 PART 3 TYPE OF PERMIT APPLICATION ::PART 4 OTHER PERMITS . 1 1 Subdivision I I DOF/G HPA Shoreline Management I I Short Subdivision I I COE 404 11 Rockery r5it Grading I I DOE Dam Safety I I Structural Vaults ® Commercial I I FEMA Floodplain I I Other I I Other I I COE Wetlands I I HPA PART 5 SITE COMMUNITY AND DRAINAGE BASIN Community I3C01270 TVi C rry CYP Drainage Basin. $Lvki. "9-avt✓R Svc.--bick N1 (ILL ee.N PART 6 SITE CHARACTERISTICS River I I Floodplain Stream I>Q Wetlands I I Critical Stream Reach I 1 Seeps/Springs I 1 Depressions/Swales I I High Groundwater Table I I Lake -- Li Groundwater Recharge I 1 Steep Slopes -- LI Other I 1 Lakeside/Erosion Hazard PART 7 SOILS Soil Type Slopes Erosion Potential Erosive Velocities RAW i ; b% Lou> [_] Additional Sheets Attatched 1/90 r � Page 2 of 2 King County Building and Land Development Division TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET PART 8 DEVELOPMENT LIMITATIONS REFERENCE LIMITATION/SITE CONSTRAINT I I Ch.4-Downstream Analysis I I I 1 I 1 I I f I ( 1 Additional Sheets Attatched PART 9 ESC REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS DURING CONSTRUCTION FOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION 1 1 Sedimentation Facilities 'C'l Stabilize Exposed Surface X1 Stabilized Construction Entrance IX] Remove and Restore Temporary ESC Facilities 15<I Perimeter Runoff Control IXI Clean and Remove All Silt and Debris Clearing and Grad ng Restrictions .X) Ensure Operation of Permanent Facilities Cover Practices I 1 Flag Limits of NGPES Construction Sequence I I Other I 1 Other PART 10 SURFACE ATER SYSTEM fxl Grass Lined Channel I 1 Tank I I Infiltration Method of Analysis 1?<1 Pipe System Vault I I Depression 513U.V\ 11 Open Channel 1 1 Energy Dissapator I I Flow Dispersal Compensation/Mitigation h<I Dry Pond I I Wetland I ) Waiver of Eliminated Site Storage lx1 Wet Pond 1 1 Stream I I Regional Detention Brief Description of System Operation IigR,(1-h r O --c -4) �(�lSs SLAalQ„S dei-eonitton - aC%\c{-Vt. Facility Related Site Limiiations 0 ( 1 Additional Sheets Attatched Reference Facility Limitation PART 11 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS PART 12 EASEMENTS/TRACTS (May require special structural review) <I Drainage Easement I Cast in Place Vault I 1 Other Access Easement I I Retaining Wall I I Native Growth Protection Easement I l Rockery>4'High I J Tract I I Structural on Steep Slope I Other PART 14 SIGNATURE OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER I or a civil engineer under my supervision have visited the site. Actual /16 site conditions as observed were incorporated into this worksheet and the I attatchments. To the besi of my knowledge the information provided here is accurate. Syn.an . 1/90 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. PROPOSED SITE CONSTRUCTION 1 II. EXISTING CONDITIONS 2 III. DEVELOPED CONDITIONS 2 IV. CORE REQUIREMENTS 7 A. CORE REQUIREMENT#1: DISCHARGE AT THE NATURAL LOCATION 7 B. CORE REQUIREMENT#2: OFF-SITE ANALYSIS 7 C. CORE REQUIREMENT#3: RUNOFF CONTROL 7 D. CORE REQUIREMENT#4: CONVEYANCE SYSTEM 7 E. CORE REQUIREMENT#5: TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN 7 V. SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS 8 A. SPECIAL REQUIREMENT#1: CRITICAL DRAINAGE AREAS 8 B. SPECIAL REQUIREMENT#2: COMPLIANCE WITH AN EXISTING MASTER DRAINAGE PLAN 8 C. SPECIAL REQUIREMENT#3: CONDITIONS REQLIIRING A MASTER DRAINAGE PLAN 8 D. SPECIAL REQUIREMENT#4: ADOPTED BASIN OR COMMUNITY PLANS 8 E. SPECIAL REQUIREMENT#5: SPECIAL WATER QUALITY CONTROLS 8 F. SPEC::AL REQUIREMENT#11: GEOTECHNICAL ANALYSIS AND REPORT 9 G. SPECIAL REQUIREMENT#12: SOILS ANALYSIS AND REPORT 9 VI. DETENTION 9 VII. WATER QUALITY 10 VIII. OFF-SITE ANALYSIS 10 IX. CONCLUSION 11 APPENDIX A—HYDROLOGIC PARAMETERS & DETENTION CALCULATIONS SCS Cuive Numbers Table WaterWorks Data Output 2, 10 and 100-Year Isopluvials Black River Sub-Basin Map & Summary APPENDIX B—OFF-SITE BACKWATER ANALYSIS StormCad Data Output Peterson Consulting Engineers Page i Preliminary Drainage Report for Pacific Gulf Warehouse July 20, 1999 I. PROPOSED SITE CONSTRUCTION The proposed project is the construction of a 106,752 SF warehouse and office facility with associated parking and landscaping on approximately 7.39 acres. The site is located within the City of Renton at the 3900 block of Lind Avenue SW, south of SW 34th Street (see Vicinity Map below). More specifically, the site is located within Section 30, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M in King County, Washington. Existing development adjacent to the site includes railroad tracks and U.S. Rentals, bounding the site to the north; Home Base retail store and a wetland and detention berm bounding the site to the east; undeveloped land to the south; and Lind Avenue bounding the site to the west. Based on the results of an onsite detailed soil content analysis completed by Terra Associal es, the site contains alluvium soils (Qaw). This soil type contains several layers of silty sand fill, and displays characteristics of moderately high runoff potential. The soil qualities closely resemble those defined as hydrologic soil class C per the King County Surface Water Design Manual (SWDM). SW GRADY WAY i/41&- SW 16TH 11111. k ST h W J> 3 2 tiz J C W SW 27774 sr SW 34TH ST I.-SITE CARR RD SW 43RD ST VICINITY MAP (NOT TO SCALE) Peterson consulting Engineers Page 1 Prelintina,_v Drainage Report for Pacific Gulf Warehouse July 20, 1999 II. EXISTING CONDITIONS The existing site contains sparse grasslands and relatively no vegetation. There are several small shrubs along the western boundary of the site. A portion of the site, approximately 1.25 Acres, contains an existing wetland buffer and will not be disturbed as part of this project and excluded in the detention calculations. There are also portions of the site which are detained for in the existing condition and are not included in detention calculations. The onsite drainage patterns generally sheet flow from the east to the west at relatively flat slopes (1% to 3%). The existing basin area, 5.57 Acres, used in the WaterWorks analysis has been delineated on the Existing Conditions Map on Page 3. The hydrologic parameters are summarized below and the existing peak flows for the 2, 10 and 100-year, 24-hour storm events are summarized in Table 1 on Page 6. The existing conditions area was modeled using an existing S.C.S. curve number (CN = 90) for grass cover on 50% to 75% of the area. Please refer to Appendix A for the Curve Numbers table and WaterWorks data output. Total Area= 5.57 Ac Pervious Area= 5.57 Ac CN=90 (grass cover 50-75%) Time of Concentration= 18.28 min. Reach 1: 160' Sheet Flow @ 2.00%; 'n' = 0.40 (grass) III. DEVELOPED CONDITIONS The proposed site will consist of a 2.45-Acre warehouse and office facility with parking/paved areas and landscaping. The onsite drainage will be divided into two hydrologic basins (See Developed Conditions Map on Page 4). The southern portion of the site will comprise onsite Basin 'A'. Runoff generated within Basin 'A' will be routed to approximately the midpoint of the southern boundary of the site, into a combination detention/wet pond, via grass swales and a tightline system. The northern portion of the Peterson Consulting Engineers Page 2 100' 0 100' iniiiiiiMil SCALE: 1" = 100' e�i _�— / .,. -•anal I ' - , WIIII i i6'W II 1111 •\ J 111 Y TO FAR WEST _ �r STEEL DETENTION ►,[�l -FACILITY It jAREA=0.42 AC ii. TI0N I I ' ►!1( if �I \ � � Ir \ I1I. ,> , I I I L �II I I � � , \ \\,... III - - - -( -r ,.,i ,\1I/ - (il �A;�• TEN�RERECE ING AND COMPANY PMENT CONSULTANTS 1 320 2nd Ave.South,SnA.200 KIRKLAND,WASHINGTON 98033 PHONE(N25)822-2577 FAO(425)822-8758 CITY OF RENTON W w' DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PACIFIC GULF WAREHOUSE EXISTING iCONDITIONS MAP ff DESIGNED: B.G.T. DATE: 7/20/99 FILE NAME:EXIMIT,9 DRAWN: R.S.G C _.� CHECKED: B.C.T. SCALE 1'= 100' f"'^^^-- W PAGE 3 - N BY APPR. M7E APPROVED: sozcrm .,,n.c ww: _.._ r i ei 1 � PROPOSED DETENTION I al r r' Itif VAUL T r --D-sfl-- , - - in_. 100' 0 100' j '�, �� ` SCALE: 1" = 100' 11 jail�l1 I i . ail/ga' ii1i TO EX/S l 161KIIIII — SYSTEM l �ii, ill! m :fig' 4 Y, �u:, �� AREA=0�13 , L z:.L.. I VI J \ �h��.;n�::N.�<n�;�4�:;.,; III, �� s : r: 11 TO FAR WEST : ?:..it''''' ''''' * A r k l' 1 �2 ,'''' g: 1 �, STEEL DETENTION ►►�'' 'FACILI TY Arl '� /AREA=0.42 AC L ,1i J.s,: g ,. + ( ,I � . ' ''I 1 I0 i Ii.`� \ If 1 1/ 1 r .,. , 74.5,.!,,.:..,,, .,,,,y i i1'= =' =.:: .:�.'; ., 1IM I I I II=__ N`.:'. . _ ` 1 \�\ \\ \ I I I II 40541 ii,,,,1/4„, ,. N. .,/, t 11 ilL ___ _,._ in nw II 4 . A j Ns I 1 I '\ ' ill II '\ v -!' g FT. TREECE COMPANY ENGINEERING AND DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS 1 320 2nd An.SnAI,SdN 200 KEIKUM WASHING/ON 90033 PHONE(425)122-2577 MAX(425)022-175E CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PACIFIC GULF WAREHOUSE DEVELOPED CONDITIONS MAP DESIGNEIR BAT DATE 7/20/89 FILE NauE IX'IJRE19 DRAWS. RS.0 CHECKED: dC.T. SCALE.' 1"+ 100' rq--' PAGE 4 - BY APPR. DATE APPROVED: C. Preliminary Drainage Report for Pacific Gulf Warehouse July 20, 1999 site comprises hydrologic Basin `B'. Runoff generated within Basin 'B' will be conveyed via a grass swale and tightline system to a combination detention/wet vault. An onsite hydrologic analysis was completed for both of the onsite basins utilizing the WaterWorks software to determine the 2, 10 and 100-year, 24-hour peak flows generated by the developed conditions, see output in Appendix A. The hydrologic parameters are summarized below for Basin A and B and peak flows presented in Table 1 on Page 6. Basin 'A' Area= 2.88 Ac Pervious Area= 0.25 Ac a CN=86 (landscaping) Impervious Area= 2.63 Ac CN=98 (pavement & roofs) Time of Concentration= 5.00 minutes (minimum) Basin `B' Area= 2.69 Ac Pervious Area= 0.25 Ac @ CN=86 (landscaping) Impervious Area=2.44 Ac @ CN=98 (pavement & roofs) Time of Concentration= 5.00 minutes (minimum) Both the northerly and the southerly detention basins will discharge into an existing 60- inch storm drain within Lind Road via two existing storm drain stubs coming in to the proposed site. A detailed discussion of the proposed storm drain system is discussed in the section within this report entitled "offsite analysis." Two on-site storm detention facilities will be provided, as discussed in the previous section, to limit the on-site runoff to quantities defined by the existing drainage condition hydrologic analysis. Peterson Consulting Engineers Page 5 Preliminary Drainage Report.for Pacific Gulf Warehouse July 20, 1999 Precipitation Site runoff and water quality treatment rates were calculated using WaterWorks software with the SBUH KC24HR, 24-hour storm event. Precipitation was determined from the King County SWDM Manual Isopluvial Maps for the 2, 10 and 100-year, 24-hour storm events, see Appendix A. Precipitation rates are: • Water Quality Design Storm: 0.65 inches • 2 Year, 24 Hour Storm: 1.95 inches • 10 Year, 24 Hour Storm: 2.85 inches • 100 Year, 24 Hour Storm: 3.90 inches TABLE 1 - � .:.... :.::...:::.:.. :. _ ..-.-:.:::i.ii:i:'::....�.:..::.:.v::i::i::::i:::i:::..Y.:iiiii'..�•r.:::•i'rj:iiy?i.'•i ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Existing Basin 2-year 1.21 1.95 5.57 0.49 10-year 2.26 2.85 • 5.57 0.86 100-year 3.54 3.90 5.57 1.31 .:....... ... . .... : Developed Win,'A 2-year 1.34 1.95 2.88 0.39 10-year 2.04 2.85 2.88 0.61 100-year 2.86 3.90 2.88 0.85 Water. .Q. uality 0.34 0.65 2.88 . ........... .. . . .0.10 �. 2-year 1.25 1.95 2.69 0.37 10-year 1.90 2.85 2.69 0.56 100-year 2.66 3.90 2.69 0.80 Water Quality 0.32 '0.65 2.69 0.09 • • Peterson consulting Engineers Page 6 Preliminary Drainage Report.far Pacific Gulf Warehouse July 20, 1999 IV. CORE REQUIREMENTS A. Core Requirement#1: Discharge at the Natural Location The proposed onsite conditions and patterns emulate those of the existing site conditions. The developed onsite runoff will be routed via surface flow within the onsite street/parking section, stored within two onsite detention facilities and discharged to the west into an existing storm drain within Lind Avenue. The development runoff will be discharged at two locations to approximate the existing sheet flow conditions. B. Core Requirement#2: Off-site Analysis An existing 60-inch storm sewer system is located within Lind Avenue. An outfall storm drain system will be constructed for each of the onsite detention facilities that will serve to connect to two existing storm drain stubs adjacent to the site (see detailed discussion within Section VIII, entitled "offsite analysis"). C Core Requirement#3: Runoff Control Runoff control will be provided for the warehouse and office facility by constructing two onsite detention facilities capable of capturing the developed peak flows and releasing them at the existing condition peak runoff rates for the 2, 10 and 100-year, 24-hour storm events. A detailed discussion of the design and calculations for the volume of the detention basin is included in the next section. D. Core Requirement#4: Conveyance System The proposed onsite conveyance system, grass swales and tightline system, will route runoff to a detention/water quality facility prior to being released from the site. E. Core Requirement#5: Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control Plan An erosion and sediment control plan, which will serve to minimize soil erosion/sedimentation during the proposed site construction, will be prepared for the Peterson Consulting Engineers Page 7 Preliminary Drainage Report for Pacific Gulf Warehouse July 20, 1999 final submittal of the warehouse and office facility improvement plans. Temporary erosion and sediment control Best Management Practices (BMP's) will be implemented during the project construction phase. BMP's will include perimeter protection silt fencing (where necessary), temporary sediment ponds, stabilized construction entrances, catch basin protection, and permanent cover protection (landscaping). V. SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS A. Special Requirement#1: Critical Drainage Areas The site is located within the Black River Sub-Basin, Green River Basin (See Black River Basin Map and Summary in Appendix A). This basin is not defined as a critical drainage area in the '92 King County Surface Water Design Manual. B. Special Requirement#2: Compliance with an Existing Master Drainage Plan Not applicable to the Pacific Gulf Warehouse site. C. Special Requirement#3: Conditions Requiring a Master Drainage Plan Not applicable to the Pacific Gulf Warehouse site. D. Special Requirement#4:Adopted Basin or Community Plans The site is located within the Black River Sub-Basin, Green River Basin (See Black River Basin Map and Summary in Appendix A). E. Special Requirement#5: Special Water Quality Controls The proposed project will create approximately 111,500 SF of new impervious area subject to vehicular traffic. A wet pond and wet vault have been designed to meet this special requirement. Special Requirements #6-#10 are not applicable to this site. Peterson Consulting Engineers Page 8 Preliniinmy Drainage Report for Pacific Gulf Warehouse July 20, 1999 F. Special Requirenzent#11: Geotechnical Analysis and Report Terra Associates, Inc., have prepared a Geotechnical Study dated June 9, 1999, copies have been submitted to the City of Renton as part of the SEPA submittal. G. Special Requirement#12: Soils Analysis and Report • Terra Associates, Inc., have prepared a Geotechnical Study dated June 9, 1999, copies have been submitted to the City of Renton as part of the SEPA submittal. VI. DETENTION A hydrologic analysis of the site was completed in order to determine the required on-site detention necessary to eliminate negative downstream impacts due to development. An analysis was completed utilizing the WaterWorks software to determine the existing and developed runoff rates for the 2, 10 and 100 year, 24-hour storm events. The runoff rates were then used to determine the corresponding Basin A and Basin B required detention to generate release rates equivalent to those produced by the existing conditions, see Table 2 on page 10. Additionally, the WaterWorks-software was utilized to determine the required detention storage volume, as well as the required dimensions of the discharge facility. The WaterWorks output is included within Appendix A and indicates that the required on-site detention volume is approximately 3,988 cubic feet and 3,575 cubic feet for the Basin A and Basin B detention facilities, respectively. Basin A detention facility will be approximately 45 feet long by 45 feet wide pond at the maximum water surface, providing 22,000 cubic feet. This detention facility is designed to detain runoff as delineated on the Developed Conditions Map on page 4. The proposed detention outfall system will be a 12-inch storm drainpipe, which will connect to the existing 15-inch storm drain stub which outlets to the existing 60-inch storm drain on the West Side of Lind Avenue. Peterson Consulting Engineers Page 9 Preliminary Drainage Report for Pacific Gulf Warehouse July 20, 1999 Basin B detention facility will be approximately a 40-foot long by 15-foot wide vault, providing 3,600 cubic-feet. This detention facility is designed to detain runoff as delineated on the Developed Conditions Map on page 4. The proposed detention will outfall via a 12-inch pipe connecting to an existing 12-inch storm drain stub (from the 60- inch pipe) crossing Lind Avenue. TABLE 2: RELEASE RATES 2-Year 1.21 0.63 0.58 1.21 10-Year 2.26 1.16 1.10 2.26 100-Year 3.54 1.80 1.73 3.53 VII. WATER QUALITY The water quality volume was calculated based on the water quality design storm per City of Renton Standards. This volume of runoff is determined from the tributary sub-basin proposed developed conditions using a water quality design storm event having a precipitation equal to one-third of the two-year, 24-hour precipitation. Basin A Required Dead Storage Volume = 4,405 CF Dead storage will be, provided under the live storage depth in the combination detention/wet pond. Basin B Required Dead Storage Volume = 4,091 CF Dead storage will be provided under the live storage depth in the combination detention/wet vault. VIII. OFF-SITE ANALYSIS As shown in Figure 3, an existing 60-inch storm pipe is located within the north half of Lind Avenue. Two existing storm pipe stubs extend from the existing 60-inch storm pipe adjacent to the site; one 24-inch stub at the southwest corner of the site, and one 15-inch Peterson Consulting Engineers Page 10 Preliminary Drainage Report,for Pacific Gulf Warehouse July 20, 1999 going in to a 12-inch stub located at the midpoint of the western boundary. The outfall pipe from the southerly detention facility will consist of approximately 40 LF and will connect to the 24-inch lateral stub. The northerly detention facility will discharge into a 12-inch pipe and will be extended approximately 270 LF to the southwest to the 12-inch lateral stub. Both of the stubs will contribute flows to the existing 60-inch pipe. The report entitled "Drainage Calculations for U.S. Rentals," completed by Concept Engineering, indicates that the City of Renton recognizes a tailwater condition in the 60- inch diameter pipe within Lind Avenue. According to information within the report, development projects within the area are required to base their conveyance analyses on a 2-year tailwater elevation of 14.6 (NAVD 88). Converted to the vertical datum used for the warehouse and office facility, the tailwater elevation is approximately 11.26 feet. This tailwater was adjusted for our site location by using the 60-inch gradient and the distance from the U.S. Rentals site. The StormCad program by Haestad was utilized to determine the hydraulic grade lines of the two storm drainpipes discharging 2-year developed site flows. The StormCad output is included in Appendix B. IX. CONCLUSION Based on the information contained within this Preliminary Drainage Report, the construction of the proposed warehouse and office facility is not expected to create a negative impact on the existing adjacent areas. Peterson Consulting Engineers Page 11 APPENDIX A HYDROLOGIC PARAMETERS & DETENTION CALCULATIONS KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL TABLE 3.5.2B SCS WESTERN WASHINGTON RUNOFF CURVE NUMBERS SCS WESTERN WASHINGTON RUNOFF CURVE NUMBERS (Published by SCS in 1982) Runoff curv' numbers for selected agricultural, suburban and urban land use for Type 1A rainfall distribution, 24-hour storm duration. CURVE NUMBERS BY HYDROLOGIC S GROUP LAND USE DESCRIPTION A B }C D Cultivated land(1): winter condition 86 91 94 95 Mountain open areas: low growing brush and grasslands 74 82 89 92 Meadow or pasture: 65 78 85 89 Wood or forest land: undisturbed or older second growth 42 64 76 81 Wood or forest land: young second growth or brush 55 72 81 86 Orchard: with cover crop 81 88 92 94 Open spaces, lawns, parks, golf courses, cemeteries, landscaping. good condition: grass cover-on 75% or more of the area 68 80 86 90 fair condition: grass cover on 50% to 75% of the area 77 85 90 92 Gravel roads and parking lots 76 85 89 91 Dirt roads and parking lots 72 82 87 89 Impervious surfaces, pavement, roofs, etc. 9R 98 98 98 Open water bodies: lakes, wetlands, ponds, etc. 100 100 100 100 Single Family Residential (2) Dwelling Unit/Gross Acre % Impervious (3) 1.0 DU/GA 15 Separate curve number 1.5 DU/GA 20 shall be selected 2.0 DU/GA 25 for pervious and 2.5 DU/GA 30 impervious portion 3.0 DU/GA 34 of the site or basin 3.5 DU/GA 38 4.0 DU/GA 42 4.5 DU/GA 46 5.0 DU/GA 48 5.5 DU/GA 50 6.0 DU/GA 52 6.5 DU/GA 54 7.0 DU/GA 56 Planned unit developments, % impervious condominiums, apartments, must be computed commercial business and industrial areas. (1) For a more detailed description of agricultural land use curve numbers refer to National Engineering Handbook, Section 4, Hydrology, Chapter 9, August 1972. (2) Assumes roof and driveway runoff is directed into street/storm system. (3) The remaining pervious areas (lawn) are considered to be in good condition for these curve numbers. 3.5.2-3 11/92 7/21/99 4 :22 :36 pm Peterson Engineering Consulting page 1 BASIN A - PACIFIC GULF WAREHOUSE PRELIMINARY DETENTION CALCULATIONS BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: Al NAME: 2 YEAR EXISTING SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 5 .57 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE KC24HR PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 1 .95 inches AREA. . : 5 . 57 Acres 0 . 00 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10 . 00 min CN • 90 . 00 0 . 00 TC - 18 . 28 min 0 . 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 TcReach - Sheet L: 160 . 00 ns : 0 . 1500 p2yr: 1 . 95 s : 0 . 0200 PEAK RATE: 1 .21 cfs VOL: 0 .49 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min BASIN ID: A2 NAME: 10 YEAR EXISTING SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 5 .57 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 .00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • KC24HR PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 2 . 85 inches AREA. . : 5 .57 Acres 0 . 00 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 . 00 min CN • 90 . 00 0 . 00 TC • 18 .28 min 0 . 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 PEAK RATE: 2 .26 cfs VOL: 0 .86 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min BASIN ID: A3 NAME: 100 YEAR EXISTING SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 5 .57 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • KC24HR PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 3 .90 inches AREA. . : 5 .57 Acres' 0 . 00 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10 . 00 min CN • 90 . 00 0 . 00 TC • 18 .28 min 0 . 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 PEAK RATE: 3 .54 cfs VOL: 1 .31 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min BASIN ID: B1 NAME: BASIN A - 2 YEAR DEVELOPED SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 2 . 88 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • KC24HR PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 1 . 95 inches AREA. . : 0 .25 Acres 2 . 63 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 . 00 min CN • 86 . 00 98 . 00 TC 5 . 00 min 5 . 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 PEAK RATE: 1 .34 cfs VOL: 0 .39 Ac-ft TIME: 470 min 7/21/99 4 :22 :36 pm Peterson Engineering Consulting page 2 BASIN A - PACIFIC GULF WAREHOUSE PRELIMINARY DETENTION CALCULATIONS BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: B2 NAME: BASIN A - 10 YEAR DEVELOPED SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 2 . 88 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE KC24HR PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 2 . 85 inches AREA. . : 0 .25 Acres 2 .63 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 . 00 min CN • 86 . 00 98 . 00 TC 5 . 00 min 5 . 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 . 20 PEAK RATE: 2 . 04 cfs VOL: 0 .61 Ac-ft TIME: 470 min BASIN ID: B3 NAME: BASIN A - 100 YEAR DEVELOPED SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 2 . 88 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE KC24HR PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 3 . 90 inches AREA. . : 0 .25 Acres 2 .63 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 . 00 min CN • 86 . 00 98 . 00 TC • 5 . 00 min 5 . 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 PEAK RATE: 2 . 86 cfs VOL: 0 .85 Ac-ft TIME: 470 min BASIN ID: B4 NAME: BASIN A - WATER QUALITY SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 2 . 88 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • KC24HR PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 0 . 65 inches AREA. . : 0 . 25 Acres 2 .63 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10 . 00 min CN • 86 . 00 98 . 00 TC • 5. 00 min 5 . 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 PEAK RATE: 0 . 34 cfs VOL: 0 . 10 Ac-ft TIME: 470 min • 7/21/99 4 : 19 :48 pm Peterson Engineering Consulting page 4 BASIN A - PACIFIC GULF WAREHOUSE PRELIMINARY DETENTION CALCULATIONS HYDROGRAPH SUMMARY PEAK TIME VOLUME HYD RUNOFF OF OF Contrib NUM RATE PEAK HYDRO Area cfs min. cf\AcFt Acres 1 1 .212 480 21261 cf 5 .57 2 2 .262 480 37342 Cf 5 .57 3 3 . 544 480 57108 cf 5 . 57 4 1 .340 470 17203 Cf 2 . 88 5 2 . 040 470 26395 cf 2 .88 6 2 . 856 470 37221 cf 2 . 88 7 0 .340 470 4405 Cf 2 . 88 8 1 .246 470 16013 Cf 2 . 69 9 1 . 899 470 24589 Cf 2 .69 10 2 . 662 470 34693 cf 2 .69 11 0 .386 470 3996 cf 2 . 69 14 0 . 630 500 17203 cf 2 . 88 15 1 . 160 500 26395 cf 2 . 88 16 1 . 801 500 37221 cf 2 . 88 17 0 .602 500 16013 Cf 2 . 69 18 1 .100 500 24589 cf 2 . 69 7/21/99 4 :19 :49 pm Peterson Engineering Consulting page 5 BASIN A - PACIFIC GULF WAREHOUSE PRELIMINARY DETENTION CALCULATIONS STAGE STORAGE TABLE TRAPEZOIDAL BASIN ID No. BASINA Description: PRELIMINARY DETENTION POND Length: 45 . 00 ft. Width: 45 . 00 ft . Side Slope 1 : 3 Side Slope 3 : 3 Side Slope 2 : 3 Side Slope 4 : 3 Infiltration Rate: 0 . 00 min/inch STAGE <----STORAGE----> STAGE <----STORAGE----> STAGE <----STORAGE----> STAGE <----STORAGE----> (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- 10.50 0.0000 0.0000 11.90 3397 0.0780 13.30 8050 0.1848 14.70 14157 0.3250 10.60 205.21 0.0047 12.00 3686 0.0846 13.40 8436 0.1937 14.80 14654 0.3364 10.70 415.90 0.0095 12.10 3980 0.0914 13.50 8829 0.2027 14.90 15159 0.3480 10.80 632.12 0.0145 12.20 4282 0.0983 13.60 9230 0.2119 15.00 15674 0.3598 10.90 853.97 0.0196 12.30 4590 0.1054 13.70 9638 0.2213 15.10 16196 0.3718 11.00 1082 0.0248 12.40 4905 0.1126 13.80 10054 0.2308 15.20 16728 0.3840 11.10 1315 0.0302 12.50 5226 0.1200 13.90 10478 0.2405 15.30 17268 0.3964 11.20 1554 0.0357 12.60 5554 0.1275 14.00 10910 0.2504 15.40 17817 0.4090 11.30 1799 0.0413 12.70 - 5890 0.1352 14.10 11349 0.2605 15.50 18375 0.4218 11.40 2050 0.0471 12.80 6232 0.1431 14.20 11797 0.2708 15.60 18942 0.4348 11.50 2307 0.0530 12.90 6581 0.1511 14.30 12252 0.2813 15.70 19518 0.4481 11.60 2570 0.0590 13.00 6938 0.1593 14.40 12716 0.2919 15.80 20103 0.4615 11.70 2840 0.0652 13.10 7301 0.1676 14.50 13188 0.3028 15.90 20698 0.4752 11.80 3115 0.0715 13.20 7672 0.1761 14.60 13668 0.3138 16.00 21302 0.4890 7/21/99 4 : 19 :49 pm Peterson Engineering Consulting page 6 BASIN A - PACIFIC GULF WAREHOUSE PRELIMINARY DETENTION CALCULATIONS STAGE DISCHARGE TABLE MULTIPLE ORIFICE ID No. BASINA Description: CONTROL STRUCTURE Outlet Elev: 10 . 50 Elev: 8 .50 ft Orifice Diameter: 5 .1445 in. Elev: 11.40 ft Orifice 2 Diameter: 4 . 9805 in. Elev: 11 . 80 ft Orifice 3 Diameter: 4 . 6875 in. STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> (ft) ---cfa (ft) ---cfe (ft) ---cfa (ft) ---cfa 10.50 0.0000 11.90 1.5143 13.30 2.8599 14.70 3.7101 10.60 0.2271 12.00 1.6677 13.40 2.9293 14.80 3.7633 10.70 0.3212 12.10 1.7983 13.50 2.9969 14.90 3.8157 10.80 0.3934 12.20 1.9156 13.60 3.0629 15.00 3.8674 10.90 0.4542 12.30 2.0238 13.70 3.1275 15.10 3.9184 11.00 0.5079 12.40 2.1250 13.80 3.1908 15.20 3.9687 11.10 0.5563 12.50 2.2206 13.90 3.2527 15.30 4.0184 11.20 0.6009 12.60 2.3115 14.00 3.3135 15.40 4.0675 11.30 0.6424 12.70 2.3984 14.10 3.3731 15.50 4.1159 11.40 0.6814 12.80 2.4820 14.20 3.4316 15.60 4.1638 11.50 0.9311 12.90 2.5624 14.30 3.4892 15.70 4.2112 11.60 1.0543 13.00 2.6402 14.40 3.5457 15.80 4.2580 11.70 1.1555 13.10 2.7156 14.50 3.6014 15.90 4.3043 11.80 1.2446 13.20 2.7888 14.60 3.6562 16.00 4.3501 7/21/99 4 : 19 :49 pm Peterson Engineering Consulting page 7 BASIN A - PACIFIC GULF WAREHOUSE PRELIMINARY DETENTION CALCULATIONS LEVEL POOL TABLE SUMMARY MATCH INFLOW -STO- -DIS- <-PEAK-> STORAGE DESCRIPTION > (cfs) (cfs) --id- --id- <-STAGE> id VOL (cf) A-MATCH 2 YEAR 0.63 1.3.4 BASINA BASINA 11.27 14 1728.36 of A-MATCH 10 YEAR 1.16 2.04 SASINA BASINA 11.70 15 2853.05 cf A-MATCH 100 YEAR 1.80 2.86 BASINA BASINA 12.10 16 3988.45 cf 7/21/99 4 :31 :37 pm Peterson Engineering Consulting page 1 BASIN B - PACIFIC GULF WAREHOUSE PRELIMINARY DETENTION CALCULATIONS BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: Cl NAME: BASIN B - 2 YEAR DEVELOPED SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 2 .69 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE KC24HR PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 1 . 95 inches AREA. . : 0 .25 Acres 2 .44 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10 . 00 min CN • 86 . 00 98 . 00 TC 5 . 00 min 5 . 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 . 20 PEAK RATE: 1 .25 cfs VOL: 0 .37 Ac-ft TIME: 470 min BASIN ID: C2 NAME: BASIN B - 10 YEAR DEVELOPED SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 2 . 69 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE KC24HR PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 2 .85 inches AREA. . : 0 .25 Acres 2 .44 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 . 00 min CN • 86 . 00 98 . 00 TC 5 . 00 min 5 . 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 . 20 PEAK RATE: 1 . 90 cfs VOL: 0 .56 Ac-ft TIME: 470 min BASIN ID: C3 NAME: BASIN B - 100 YEAR DEVELOPED SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 2 . 69 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 , 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE KC24HR PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 3 . 90 inches AREA. . : 0 .25 Acres 2 .44 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 . 00 min CN • 86 . 00 98 . 00 TC • 5 . 00 min 5 . 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 . 20 PEAK RATE: 2 .66 cfs VOL: 0 . 80 Ac-ft TIME: 470 min BASIN ID: C4 NAME: BASIN B - WATER QUALITY SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 2 . 69 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE KC24HR PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 0 . 65 inches AREA. . : 0 .25 Acres 2 .44 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 . 00 min CN • 86 . 00 98 . 00 TC 5 . 00 min 5 . 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 . 20 PEAK RATE: 0 .32 cfs VOL: 0 . 09 Ac-ft TIME: 470 min 7/21/99 4 : 31:37 pm Peterson Engineering Consulting page 2 BASIN B - PACIFIC GULF WAREHOUSE PRELIMINARY DETENTION CALCULATIONS HYDROGRAPH SUMMARY PEAK TIME VOLUME HYD RUNOFF OF OF Contrib NUM RATE PEAK HYDRO Area cfs min. cf\AcFt Acres 1 1.212 480 21261 cf 5 .57 2 2 . 262 480 37342 Cf 5 .57 3 3 . 544 480 57108 cf 5 . 57 4 1.340 470 17203 cf 2 . 88 5 2 . 040 470 26395 Cf 2 . 88 6 2 .856 470 37221 cf 2 . 88 7 0 .340 470 4405 Cf 2 . 88 8 1 .246 470 16013 cf 2 . 69 9 1 . 899 470 24589 Cf 2 . 69 10 2 . 662 470 34693 cf 2 . 69 11 0 .315 470 4091 Cf 2 . 69 14 0 . 630 500 17203 Cf 2 . 88 15 1 . 160 500 26395 cf 2 . 88 16 1 .801 500 37221 Cf 2 . 88 17 0 .580 500 16013 cf 2 . 69 18 1 .101 500 24589 cf 2 . 69 19 1. 729 500 34693 cf 2 . 69 7/21/99 4 :23 :27 pm Peterson Engineering Consulting page 3 BASIN B - PACIFIC GULF WAREHOUSE PRELIMINARY DETENTION CALCULATIONS STAGE STORAGE TABLE RECTANGULAR VAULT ID No. BASINB Description: PRELIMINARY DETENTION VAULT Length: 40 . 00 ft . Width: 15 . 00 ft . voids : 1 . 000 STAGE <----STORAGE----> STAGE <----STORAGE----> STAGE <----STORAGE----> STAGE <----STORAGE----> (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- 10.50 0.0000 0.0000 12.60 1260 0.0289 14.70 2520 0.0579 16.80 3780 0.0868 10.60 60.000 0.0014 12.70 1320 0.0303 14.80 2580 0.0592 16.90 3840 0.0882 10.70 120.00 0.0028 12.80 1380 0.0317 14.90 2640 0.0606 17.00 3900 0.0895 10.80 180.00 0.0041 12.90 1440 0.0331 15.00 2700 0.0620 17.10 3960 0.0909 10.90 240.00 0.0055 13.00 1500 0.0344 15.10 2760 0.0634 17.20 4020 0.0923 11.00 300.00 0.0069 13.10 1560 0.0358 15.20 2820 0.0647 17.30 4080 0.0937 11.10 360.00 0.0083 13.20 1620 0.0372 15.30 2880 0.0661 17.40 4140 0.0950 11.20 420.00 0.0096 13.30 1680 0.0386 15.40 2940 0.0675 17.50 4200 0.0964 11.30 480.00 0.0110 13.40 1740 0.0399 15.50 3000 0.0689 17.60 4260 0.0978 11.40 540.00 0.0124 13.50 1800 0.0413 15.60 3060 0.0702 17.70 4320 0.0992 11.50 600.00 0.0138 13.60 1860 0.0427 15.70 3120 0.0716 17.80 4380 0.1006 11.60 660.00 0.0152 13.70 1920 0.0441 15.80 3180 0.0730 17.90 4440 0.1019 11.70 720.00 0.0165 13.80 1980 0.0455 15.90 3240 0.0744 18.00 4500 0.1033 11.80 780.00 0.0179 13.90 2040 0.0468 16.00 3300 0.0758 18.10 4560 0.1047 11.90 840.00 0.0193 14.00 2100 0.0482 16.10 3360 0.0771 18.20 4620 0.1061 12.00 900.00 0.0207 14.10 2160 0.0496 16.20 3420 0.0785 18.30 4680 0.1074 12.10 960.00 0.0220 14.20 2220 0.0510 16.30 3480 0.0799 18.40 4740 0.1088 12.20 1020 0.0234 14.30 2280 0.0523 16.40 3540 0.0813 18.50 4800 0.1102 12.30 1080 0.0248 14.40 2340 0.0537 16.50 3600 0.0826 12.40 1140 0.0262 14.50 2400 0.0551 16.60 3660 0.0840 12.50 1200 0.0275 14.60 2460 0.0565 16.70 3720 0.0854 7/21/99 4 :23 :27 pm Peterson Engineering Consulting page 4 BASIN B - PACIFIC GULF WAREHOUSE PRELIMINARY DETENTION CALCULATIONS STAGE DISCHARGE TABLE MULTIPLE ORIFICE ID No. BASINB Description: CONTROL STRUCTURE Outlet Elev: 10 .50 Elev: 9 .50 ft Orifice Diameter: 3 .5801 in. Elev: 13 .40 ft Orifice 2 Diameter: 3 .3633 in. Elev: 15 . 00 ft Orifice 3 Diameter: 3 .2344 in. STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> (ft) ---cfs (ft) ---cfs (ft) ---cfs (ft) ---cfs 10.50 0.0000 12.10 0.4400 13.70 0.7903 15.30 1.3406 10.60 0.1100 12.20 0.4535 13.80 0.8260 15.40 1.3836 10.70 0.1555 12.30 0.4666 13.90 0.8584 15.50 1.4233 10.80 0.1905 12.40 0.4794 14.00 0.8885 15.60 1.4607 10.90 0.2200 12.50 0.4919 14.10 0.9168 15.70 1.4962 11.00 0.2459 12.60 0.5040 14.20 0.9436 15.80 1.5302 11.10 0.2694 12.70 0.5159 14.30 0.9692 15.90 1.5629 11.20 0.2910 12.80 0.5275 14.40 0.9938 16.00 1.5945 11.30 0.3111 12.90 0.5388 14.50 1.0176 16.10 1.6252 11.40 0.3300 13.00 0.5499 14.60 1.0405 16.20 1.6550 11.50 0.3478 13.10 0.5608 14.70 1.0628 16.30 1.6841 11.60 0.3648 13.20 0.5715 14.80 1.0844 16.40 1.7124 11.70 0.3810 13.30 0.5820 14.90 1.1055 16.50 1.7401 11.80 0.3966 13.40 0.5923 15.00 1.1261 11.90 0.4115 13.50 0.6995 15.10 1.2360 12.00 0.4260 13.60 0.7497 15.20 1.2928 7/21/99 4 :23 :28 pm Peterson Engineering Consulting page 5 BASIN B - PACIFIC GULF WAREHOUSE PRELIMINARY DETENTION CALCULATIONS LEVEL POOL TABLE SUMMARY MATCH INFLOW -STO- -DIS- c-PEAK-> STORAGE DESCRIPTION > (cfs) (cfs) --id- --id- c-STAGE> id VOL (cf) B-MATCH 2 YEAR 0.58 1.25 BASING BASING 13.28 17 1667.77 of B-MATCH 10 YEAR 1.10 1.90 BASING BASINS 14.88 18 2625.69 cf B-MATCH 100 YEAR 1.73 2.66 BASINS BASINS 16.46 19 3575.19 cf • KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL FIGURE 3.5.1C 2-YEAR 24-HOUR ISOPLUVIALS ...."----- ::::irlillir.-4:4111-41-rel.Ili --- .. 'E---- A' .;/ '-' "--...-- Atirrig*6d 42, at ram .• . pi „..... -(' S gill1 I y] 0 PI i adi1I +tea' Ingfei � tillki � b-�p /49 'jinkeoliagill - t ,.Q,41iirEill. ilillil s . .. - /9. / '%.-Igiiiikatior . : -Pk .91111% iip • • 'VI ,! 4 cb 2.Q R! �i wa�— .z � � "r� P*._ �-Liziklirfste .-.. a rkwikk vii . If ,f O sir, e :..,. R&iii��, �� "gl:ry �da ll+..WIlin� Ai A .10 . ... Ate ,V40111iLsommemp Siil,, 1.•lia 1 ''' I iiiii It;AIFT-400Z-airmatemarm •.4gro .44k,.'.. t... _ it , .. g t .--. -4-rov,,,•;:t,7--- ,,,t7,1,-- - ---0167.6:4-,1y . if "4-torirp-71 , 'II T I�) of -, , J J I Alil�� —R_:: _gpm_ai 1\ ,:liiii*,_.,4!..,A1,.... ,,, t. _ *lik ! ,— • Mut \I . 16. - _ .110ANN,, .-- . - ws- or- A,, „ ! .. .. ,simp:31404.1. 4_,Ist‘x..(___. 1 .. .. .,.,. , - - caillirak iii; kk .u.---\.‘„ : 4,-- '.-- 4 i ,,., f ,., i, lei flaw 4_ No ____,,,,, . - _ ..,,,,,N ‘,‘ ...„, , \ ' -116.2141:*:10.--1.74:79MNISONNII," . . , vq4 . ,.... _ c'jIi: 64 V ti• ler ,titigt, Ithp, - ." Wm. : - ''',:,.. UPI= i . '') 1;4t. - 4 / ,.,\ 411114-7- oes MIR+ MOM '.. '--\,'' . ,44....‘ - i_,,,- .., \ 1 t ilikalk It, AtiirEIMPlabt a br ki Iagram/ i • / 1,191111IM • 11- • rf Iir ,4 , �, I„trill 41114 . d ,.. _ JkAiiiiip.„ .Arm,. i 1 • _ ; __ ,\_., J-- ,.,. ,----. 0111 11 - 1 lot , . i-l_l\p,_---h',_,a•.- ', ,l-a'....h,f N ry 41 pk-.riN1l1Iti!lA lINMI,KIAIiA k‘71a4 a1,. f,tf4 Vr _ i1N , tee_0or1•1,r 1r 4, .. IF , ,, ,r- • , %Nair "...fir r - ' N . ..% VEMBILIA . . , . 2-YEAR 24-HOUR PRECIPITATION Winkling • ,.:r, ,•3.4�' ISOPLUVIALS OF 2-YEAR 24-HOUR 4' ." ,itaWy� - 3! TOTAL PRECIPITATION IN INCHES r . 02 0 1 2 3 4 S 6 7 8 MILS ` 1:300,000 3.5.1-8 1/90 KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL FIGUREy 3.5.1E 10-YEAR 24-HOUR ISOPLUVIALS \ 2-! ---- r. _• c• / vi --=?--- ----- — —— -- ---- --------- il,c\lapiwiF% i took 1 2.3____ 1 .-iir It 7 45111 4111) ' --*Agraillitt - i' 6-- 4 i illidi to �25 i - -MAiria fikeirrop 1 , ,„,41140140plippip vt(---,,pr ..„.., „ 0. i_ -4,, 1 /04 - i . 2.8 ilhub4.- kvallimPr ---1 Zidt 119.Viraill # 7 ' ---- itlifekr. ' `�, _ , ,,,,,,,,,,,,, .... ,, ,J,,,,„.‘,,,,,,,p. -,:..--.....,-- -.............., it--' : r .,„ „,,, 4. 1- ..,,. .4.-1,14 i i . 1' $'4 „Immo ', ITN ‘, a.... 4 ,7)1( limi „IrAmtraiLlit . -4 ' vju":811b ' ii, ' Io^ I . ,InfW1 1,1 �l9� r • W l� :� y , -vto — Pit I 4" 'W ' 43; ,'—''' ' -Nr / 7--; moil ii 1 _•-•L.A. b.,. k . ...14N‘ ,44.fi, 33 ! _ - -\ Rea* 1N\ N. _ 71.--tooks lik. Iii Niii.,--" mile . .- -4 :14. !lib\Mk Ag41,,,WwirTit 41. / . 7‘ urimbilt -Sosarliolx.:\i, ki\ qi? ,' .. \N._ ••,•44230.41440,6, _-_-_.-1, 1.- -- _.-*-arA, _, , \ pi 411MPIL ri fill i Milk _.`,:_„' t 4*$ r Ltd> 1/4•flik‘,2,. ., 771 , tltatt :I" -)--- '' , to, Bre ,....4.' Irk\ I 1/4.:1111.1111i . 11 Vi len .' t 41- /1 t' 1115jOr 1` lialir I r) m.. ir• Erg ii, ‘Vetilla , cis I& r..� �• 4 'Iir rEpli, ,,ie Al - .1. \ \ , - ,;-- ;. . i , ,, , .. I . ..\ .-) rfilegi \" °14611 - ''1 #' Pr 3 - - I 1 41A5101111 OF14111111' ' Li- li \-.. _ , --...J- -- Wrifilli 011111/640 i \-I, _ - 'x \-•.-- ettima;k111111.4iN Lii-- IA/04 1 - IlTir 1%''' . \ '— r• raw:trilikt. , it • ,_ .. ( .id. Likii. ailic, anqpiisA „ -, , r, __ 'k, Nr,_;an fr imafty 0,4 A k ,iallkif, it/ 10-YEAR 24-HOUR PRECIPITATION I , , KPAN C: frilmailititilir lilt. ! ` 3.4�" ISOPLUVIALS OF 10-YEAR 24-HOUR � �� �� I -lit. -.4 TOTAL PRECIPITATION IN INCHES �O veo 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Mlles Jv ,�lb' et 1:300,000 3.s.1 to �Rh I/90 40 KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL FIGURE 3.5.1H 100-YEAR 24-HOUR ISOPLUVIALS . t1.9.--- --itrorr -41,A 1 - , ., 6 • 2 A PrivurifieNia I.e....Jai-1,o, As. •-• v-- , /V..; Valtiel %V 3 1t11611111117450.1/241"1r17m1al-: ��� 'tea3 3 i�� � � 1 ��► rS,4 -. �, i� rA � II � e 7 amp_ 11111 owl 4. ' N.klirgiP4t • -Viiiiii - -1 4,,iMP Y r . '' I 411714- - -: i %.1ft 4dlirrA9k 244v 43 il ,,..._.,..7",__O, . A pp- 0...w...._ -..,-,...--..., . Ai ,,_ ' 464/ __ / ad 4. • F,5.,, .'kwil" •M - 11.E * i. • 47, co _.: .,::::_.- . , • . F.irta:self::; 00.0,, ___Lisois_iiroit., ..0 ...-Q 1 P'a ' ' - V.01601-' w:( it. +, - -,-.-... IL A„A„„,,a,„0, _...901VIINNIMMONNINJC x dlikk 1...lii 1 ` ' [r.- -tos,4VAM,01111=p0011.111101•11 •''' • ,* 'V. '.:* 40701707. Illb""Abli" S � Is4nd 1 ifir la ' - (it All 9,7°....81.1-00111.... . 1 4t 6 ....: Orli it k 1 '(\'' ,,:)/..7 I 4 it\1 4.41 -s . ‘1 141 rap. '11W'-411.-tp> ;g11%.1 k _ k. gaii aiSk\k i,---.:= *br �► ‘r.\ ../=.t...:-- - - low 4 _ . ..... . If l � a , .,, .,_ 0 tiii.:4011111_. „ .,---0- Vhdism.r.7",-„-sbN• r i\ / : <, • . Ari . AVE 1 • %-, — s 11 fluill. Pig- ., ,;;,--- - :' Pi ' I'm iit . ci :110-all ili, ok Np_ ,..„,- , , ,..gu ii,,, . A L,3114 di MIMI ' ' Wiwi 'o,i. 01"711 Ep En : 1 L.4 I I lki)I INAL.::14 li I i ii\ii‘_ . .1.- 1 1 1 ' . ' 11401:, ° ''' - itki ovir Ntokitiq A 4 °F . ., '' F- ',)/;e" • Ilmilwr - roPellitt - 3 r mill %rel. . 1 .. Ion. __c_, .• _ , ,...... : icsion NI ircolirotoolow 1 ;. ; i ,_____,._ 1,441,111,0 ,„,opig -4 .6sic ".. api wsq .,,, 4. .,_ _____.. ..,. 4,,,A=4,01,..rtlf Ariii.a400 .4., , _ : .• ,. 111110'. t irNwsk,40 --=...- ' , Wiiri a -1011KMV \ /,,,,, ►, •4,.. V' I ist•Ir\-\„4,14790( t .,-, • /; , :) .P7'' , 10,4„„. ,, . . . ii.,_: 7); -..,:_f_._ _.. ._.- . Amway! . F i x . .t .vrarAt . ',/, . toe c) . ...., , _ to:c) nx c, --442marmoir. i ..._, _, - )0-YEAR 24-HOUR PRECIPITATION 1� WA�� SI 6•�- 3.4 ISOPLUVIALS OF 100-YEAR 24-HOUR 1)1%�. 414 ;/ TOTAL PRECIPITATION IN INCHES �,� -� �` ' . S•S 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 B Mlles - 3.5.1-13 �` �O 1:300,000 ,,1 , 1/90 i:\ __ ( �,� 1-T _a a - ilk"' A J,`��tE113r�L ' BLACK RIVER BASIN ° 4Rr•-� ^>... -�,._-,I�f-t:-5 u\-1---1- -1��."11• . •� + -.•' g •1 .._...iiiiatii 1 ' Basin Boundary X-. �� /,- "f`� ::1 irEA ���' .® _ —•R Subcatchment Boundary -�_. ,, IQ � r>�f=w •*\,.-T'L'Tf����� " �a ' O �Collection Point r r °� o , I{aO4 ( •[iry�' 'a• . ,t_ sf /� --1� Stream op ,' ' - " 1 ,� '- [il • o \y, tr�_�_,_., 0006 Tributary Number —�41 'Tukwila. @., (r ,, ' „ 1 A A; q<,ir ray t, \ • I� F. �, `�;; ;: i r.:.x • 00301 Proposed Project \ ,,� r 1?, firl in.Sowh . 4. ,i, 00� \ Xr , '=i • � 'ij-. l enfrr t , I t1 •I ps 4. —',' 1--1. ! '.- -7 '‘,„ r h-- -5-L21-1 % ; .'-.: - ...-1/4J-71,1,1,,,.,..-..,,,IF. 4.. ,•7- ••• .5! , r r 4, r----4 ..__ -." %. --,,11-1-„1.-; tom... OO i J nr '" Ii t y I fldilla )1' , J .I. �- �\ l. R ncc r ; rr ( L/�' O Cr ,, 1.. I. u ayppoa. Li • July,1987 7 '-., --_� • 1i ' c, rt_ �. t e a , I . I, ,r l 1. r' + ''r.. 1,ie_ ra.t.?/ 1_ / O=1 :F• �• �.� ,, 1. ,h,. I : /.� _.. tea' •,--{ 1,..v„1 .9t 1 i Y S Mr �/ , O YQ '• _:'.' ._ � l ap , ,IL Alit:;.. h,... Ll.J ., 1t1,J1. , w+ r - o ' :r 1 - _ / ,4 ... a. F. i.=Zi ,Ali'l l'ir4-4 .. . 4.4 I T J -r.` , , r / oI r ; �_ o 1.;sY, -1 , A 2 01.4... ','`EIS _ SI ' � ` 030 `rrilt r � r , I �3 "� =, '; I � OD 90tfiC5 � 1 s , J t t „ _ r..WO,YW • — / ' ,Q 0 .,� � �I f I q t"J g. ?, � ,,,,,;,,,,.7,- � / m i tttll � '�N ;• 1. e t -,u ' % • - tV -CC ' r_i II(nunt rk t, ___— .._! O •;;,., . Des moues - I••'"'°unrr id., .•° M' r, rtlLP . ' y \) _ . ,,,., viiiNii•NummekT , I' %' Its ' r • { v..',(1,--.,...":.- ` + / p • — \` (two N26 I DO. 4 1 !t-i } F:r i .) c. ' e T �-.t '( a.r' �• / Yt r J •. \ "i O O 7v�.'1 t k. \r '. ir • ,. O �' \' I r.- L H4x,dnxn i �q// 1 .c•t `1, .1�, /. { „�.,�. . i 4 '�., fu lwrl v. I6 II'�J i�-r i \ 0yo, t ;' 1: 1--•"' �' e ? I ,----\ 51 I Gr c,:• i `1 • 1 1 I/ 1 I I 4 i.' '• t1 ' J _I i ,mot i 1 _1s� It i V. t� • RECONNAISSANCE REPORT NO. 14 BLACK RIVER BASIN JUNE 1987 Natural Resources and Parks Division and Surface Water Management Division King County, Washington P:BR.TOC/mlm King County Executive Tim Hill King County Council Audrey Gruger, District 1 Cynthia Sullivan, District 2 Bill Reams, District 3 Lois North, District 4 Ron Sims, District 5 Bruce Laing, District 6 Paul Barden, District 7 Bob Grieve, District 8 Gary Grant, District 9 Department of Public Works Parks, Planning and Resources Don LaBelle, Director Joe Nagel, Director Surface Water Management Division Natural Resources and Parks Division Joseph J. Simmler, Division Manager Russ Cahill, Division Manager Jim Kramer, Assistant Division Manager Bill Jolly, Acting Division Manager Dave Clark, Manager, River & Water Derek Poon, Chief, Resources Planning Section Resource Section Bill Eckel, Manager, Basin Planning Program Larry Gibbons, Manager, Project Management and Design Section Contributing Staff Contributing Staff Doug Chin, Sr. Engineer Ray Heller, Project Manager & Team Leader Randall Parsons, Sr. Engineer Matthew Clark, Project Manager Andy Levesque, Sr. Engineer Robert R. Fuerstenberg, Biologist & Team Leader Bruce Barker, Engineer Matthew J. Btuengo, Geologist Amy Stonkus, Engineer Lee Benda, Geologist Ray Steiger, Engineer Derek Booth, Geologist Pete Ringen, Engineer Dyanne Sheldon, Wetlands Biologist Cindy Baker, Earth Scientist Di Johnson, Planning Support Technician Robert Radek, Planning Support Technician Randal Bays, Planning Support Technician Fred Bentler, Planning Support Technician Consulting Staff Mark Hudson, Planning Support Technician Sharon Clausen, Planning Support Technician Don Spencer, Associate 'Geologist, Earth David Truax, Planning Support Technician Consultants, Inc. Brian Vanderburg, Planning Support Technician John Bethel, Soil Scientist, Earth Carolyn M. Byerly, Technical Writer Consultants, Inc. Susanna Hornig, Technical Writer Virginia Newman, Graphic Artist Marcia McNulty, Typesetter Mildred Miller, Typesetter Jaki Reed, Typesetter Lela Lira, Office Technician Marty Cox, Office Technician P:CR TABLE OF CONTENTS I. SUMMARY 1 II. INTRODUCTION 1 III. FINDINGS IN BLACK RIVER BASIN 2 A. Overview 2 B. Effects of Urbanization 4 C. Specific Problems 5 IV. RECOMMENDATIONS 7 A. Expand existing and/or construct additional R/D facilities 7 B. Preserve wetlands on plateau to provide natural storage 7 C. Protect steep valley walls from erosion and landslides 7 D. Reduce sedimentation in streams along valley floor 7 E. Enforce prohibitions against dumping domestic trash 7 F. Increase the overall effectiveness of surface water management 8 V. MAP 9 APPENDICES APPENDIX A: . Estimated Costs A-1 APPENDIX B: Capital Improvement Projects Rating List B-1 APPENDIX C: Detailed Findings and Recommendations C-1 P:BR.TOC/mlm • SUMMARY Black River Basin, located in south King County, is named for a river that ceased to exist in 1917, after major alterations to river systems were made to build the Lake Washington ship canal. The reconnaissance was conducted along the streams and tributaries still remaining in this basin. Development in the basin in and around the cities of Kent, Renton, and Tukwila has produced extensive areas of impervious surface, which are expected to double by the time the basin reaches its development capacity. Storm runoff from impervious surfaces is drained through pipes and discharges in some cases directly into the stream system. Field investigation of problems in the Black River Basin revealed that volumes and rates of stormwater flows have contributed to serious acceleration of erosion of streambanks and lower slopes and have produced downcutting and landslides in some places. Sedimentation resulting from these processes has, in turn, clogged existing conveyance systems, rendering many of them ineffective, and destroyed fish habitat for spawning, rearing, and migrating. In addition, the general inefficiency of the basin drainage system has increased the potential for flooding. Another problem cited was visibly poor water quality resulting from large amounts of domestic trash placed in streambeds and from commercial/industrial runoff, particularly near the Longacres Racetrack in Renton. Recommendations for action in the Black River Basin include: 1) expanding R/D facilities and preserving wetlands to assure adequate stormwater storage, 2) taking measures to protect steep valley walls from erosion and landslides 3) reducing sedimentation on the valley floor with sediment traps, 4) increasing enforcement of regulations against the dumping of trash into streams, and 5) increasing the overall effectiveness of surface water management in the basin through doing more maintenance of facilities, continuing intergovernmental agreements, lowering volumes and rates of release for stormwater, and other measures. II. INTRODUCTION: History and Goals of the Program In 1985 the King County Council approved funding for the Planning Division (now called the Natural Resources and Parks Division), in coordination with the Surface Water Management Division, to conduct a reconnaissance of 29 major drainage basins located in King County. The effort began with an initial investigation of three basins -- Evans, Soos, and Hylebos Creeks -- in order to determine existing and potential surface water problems and to recom- mend action to mitigate and prevent these problems. These initial investigations used available data and new field observations to examine geology, hydrology and habitat conditions in each basin. Findings from these three basins led the King County Council to adopt Resolution 6018 in April 1986, calling for reconnaissance to be completed on the remaining 26 basins. The Basin Reconnaissance Program, which was subsequently established, is now an important ele- ment of surface water management. The goals of the program are to provide useful data with regard to 1) critical problems needing immediate solutions, 2) basin characteristics for use in the preparation of detailed basin management plans, and 3) capital costs associated with the early resolution of drainage problems. The reconnaissance reports are intended to provide an evaluation of present drainage con- ditions in the County in order to transmit information to policymakers to aid them in deve- loping more detailed regulatory measures and specific capital improvement plans. They are not intended to ascribe in any conclusive manner the causes of drainage or erosion problems; instead, they are to be used as initial surveys from which choices for subsequent detailed engineering and other professional environmental analyses may be made. Due to the limited amount of time available for the field work in each basin, the reports must be viewed as P:BR/jr 1 Black River Basin (continued) descriptive environmental narratives rather than as final engineering conclusions. Recommendations contained in each report provide a description of potential mitigative measures for each particular basin; these measures might provide maximum environmental protection through capital project construction or development approval conditions. The appropriate extent of such measures will be decided on a case-by-case basis by County offi- cials responsible for reviewing applications for permit approvals and for choosing among com- peting projects for public construction. Nothing in the reports is intended to substitute for a more thorough environmental and engineering analysis possible on a site-specific basis for any proposal. III. FINDINGS IN BLACK RIVER BASIN The field reconnaissance in Black River Basin was conducted in February 1987 by Ray Heller, resource planner; Ray Steiger and Doug Chin, engineers; and Matthew J. Brunengo, geologist. Their findings and recommendations are presented here. A. Overview of Black River Basin Geographic and land use features. Black River Basin is generally bounded on the north by the cities of Renton and Tukwila and on the south by the city of Kent. The western and eastern boundaries are formed by the Green River and 116th Avenue SE, respectively, in this southern King County basin. The Black River, which gives its name to this basin, actually ceased to exist in 1917, when the Lake Washington ship canal was built and the level of Lake Washington was lowered, cutting off flow to the Black River. The 28-square-mile basin investigated by this field team includes what remains of the network of tributaries that formerly connected with the Black River. The Black River Basin is split nearly equally into an eastern upland plateau and a western floodplain in the Lower Green River Valley along State Road (SR) 167. The floodplain is almost wholly contained within the cities of Tukwila, Renton, and Kent, where extensive development in the last two decades has changed the landscape from a rural farming area to a commercial and industrial one. While open space and farming still exist here, the area will be infilled, primarily by a combination of commercial, industrial, and some multi-family complexes, by the year 2000. The King County Comprehensive Plan shows that the upland area will be developed at urban densities. This transition is already in progress, with commercial developments emerging along the Kent-Kangley Highway (SR 516), the Benson Highway (SR 515), and the Carr Road-176th Street SE-Petrovitsky Road corridor. Multi-family land use occurs in the uplands also and surrounds commercial developments. New single-family units are being built throughout most of the eastern upland portion of the basin. The amount of impervious surface is expected to nearly double between 1985 and the time the basin is fully developed. This will require strict controls on surface water discharge to assure prevention of further degradation of the stream system, which has already begun to exhibit adverse environmental impacts resulting from urbanization. Other factors of concern in this basin are those sensitive areas occupied by wetlands, streams, floodplains, coal-mine zones, and landslide zones. Mostly located in the eastern portion of the basin, these areas have already been damaged by the effects of develop- P:BR/jr 2 Black River Basin (continued) ment. Details of the damage, along with suggestions for mitigation, are contained in later section of this report. Dominant geologic and geomorphic features. Black River Basin consists of the part of the Duwamish Valley east of the Green River and the western edge of the Covington drift plain, a plateau underlain by glacial deposits. Small creeks, which flow across its rolling surface, have eroded deep, narrow ravines up to 1.5 miles into the plateau. Downcutting is migrating headward in the upper reaches, and erosion of.banks and lower slopes causes landsliding in the canyon walls, most of which are naturally unstable. Both of these processes are accelerated by increased flows attributable to urbanization. Sediment is deposited where the streams flow onto the valley floor. The surface of the Covington drift plain is dominantly basal till, mantled in places with recessional outwash or deposits of post-glacial lakes. Near the edge of the plateau are several lenses of sediment deposited adjacent to a glacier lobe in the Duwamish Valley. Older sediments are exposed in the ravines and bluffs. In the north, unconsolidated sediments lap up onto the southern limb of the Newcastle anticline; sedimentary and volcanic rocks crop out in the bluffs north of Panther Creek and form the Renton. Talbot, and Earlington Hills in the northern end of the valley toward Tukwila. Coal was mined from this area from 1853 until the 1940s. The Duwamish Valley is part of a trough carved into the drift plain during the last glaciation; it later became an arm of Puget Sound. A catastrophic mudflow originating on Mount Rainier approximately 5700 years ago dumped massive amounts of debris into the trough. This and other events, plus the deposition of alluvial sediment, expelled the salt water. Through the nineteenth century, the combined White and Green Rivers meandered through the valley. Near Renton, the Cedar River flowed into the Black which drained Lake Washington and flowed into the Duwamish. Beginning in 1906 a series of changes was made to these river systems. The Cedar River was diverted into Lake Washington, and the White River was diverted south to the Puyallup. The Black River itself ceased to exist. Geomorphic processes in the Black River Basin are most active on the western edge of the plateau. Lakes and wetlands formed here in the poorly drained swales. Where conditions of drainage and percolation are appropriate, small streams flow between the drumlins, eroding deep ravines into the unconsolidated sediments in the process. Over time, the ravines have been widened by mass-wasting of their walls (a process aided by groundwater) and erosion by tributary creeks; their upper ends have migrated their upstream into the plateau. Sediment carried by these streams was deposited in the Duwamish trough; after the trough became an alluvial valley, small fans formed on its edge. Hydrologic and hydraulic features. There are three distinct geographic features asso- ciated with the hydraulics of Black River Basin: the plateau east of the Lower Green River Valley, the steep (5-35°) erosive hillsides, and the flat floodplain of the valley floor. Mill, Garrison. Springbrook, and Panther Creeks, as well as three small, unnamed tri- butaries (0023, 0006B, and 0006C), all originate from locations on top of the plateau. Panther Creek originates from Panther Lake and the surrounding wetlands. The P:BR/jr 3 Black River Basin (continued) remaining tributaries originate primarily from surface water stored in natural depressions and wetland areas along the top of the hill. The surface water is collected and routed generally north and west via natural swales, open roadside ditches, culverts, and pipelines within street rights-of-way and, finally, down the steep hillsides to the valley floor. Mill Creek, located at the southernmost end of the Black River Basin, flows north between the,Green River and SR 167 and then.crosses under the highway at various locations. Mill, Springbrook, and Garrison Creeks continue north along the west side of SR 167 and eventually combine as Springbrook Creek before being pumped into the Green River through King County's Black River pump station. Tributaries 0006B and 0006C flow north independently down the hillside adjacent to Interstate 405 and into Renton, where they enter the city's storm drain system. Habitat characteristics. The use of natural streams for urban stormwater conduits has had a detrimental effect on most stream systems in the Black River Basin. Increased stormwater release rates that are higher than streams can convey without problems have resulted in extensive erosion, sedimentation, and landslides. Water quality problems caused by domestic garbage placed in streams and point discharges of pollutants are additional factors. What is striking about this basin is that these habitat problems exist everywhere. While some problems are worse than others, their impact on the fish habitat of each stream examined was profound. No fish were observed in any streams during the investigation. For this reason it is surprising that the fish counter at the Black River pump plant located on Monster Road (through which all water in the basin is discharged into the Green River recorded 84 fish entering the stream system in 1986. While this figure is higher than that for fish counts in the previous five years, it is significantly lower than historical levels or the potential levels that might be achieved if streams were in better condition for spawning. The current habitat conditions offer little hope for the future of these salmon runs. To reach spawning areas fish must first pass through an open flood-control drainage ditch for a minimum of five miles. This ditch has no vegetation or pool protection for fish to take refuge against predators or water-temperature increases. In addition, water quality is visibly poor. The eggs of fish that do reach spawning territory are likely to be smothered with sediment or washed out during heavy rainstorms: If these problems associated with development worsen, stream systems will probably be left biologically sterile. Reversing this pattern of degradation is dependent on revising the policies and priorities in the planning and zoning activities, the develop- ment review processes on the Surface Water Management programs of King County, Renton, Tukwila, and Kent. B. Effects of Urbanization in the Basin The existing upper reaches of the Black River Basin were once heavily vegetated, and natural depressions retained much of the surface water. Water was released slowly then, and the stream systems could convey flows easily. Development has brought about the removal of this vegetative cover and filling of the natural depressions. Many streams are now being piped. Impervious surfaces are increasing and will eventually account for 50 percent of the basin's surface area. In general, surface water is entering natural systems at a faster and higher rate than before development accelerated two decades ago. P:BR/jr 4 Black River Basin (continued) • Earlier discussions pointed out the serious effects this is producing in the form of ero- sion and sediment transport to lower stream reaches. Additionally, sedimentation decreases the efficiency of the entire basin drainage system by filling culverts and chan- nels. This in turn increases the potential for flooding. The city of Kent removes an estimated 1,100 cubic yards of sediment annually from its sediment facility at Mill Creek Park. The Washington State Department of Transportation also employs a regular cleaning schedule to remove gravel and sediment from its culvert under South 212th Street on Tributary 0023. Sediment from Springbrook Creek has been transported downstream from the erosive hillside to a pri- vate trout farm west of Talbot Road and rendered it inoperative. Similar examples occur throughout the basin along the bottom of the steep hillside and east of State Road 167. Erosion is further accelerated by drainage outlets from developments and public areas. Discharge from a pipe into Garrison Creek adjacent to Benson Road freefalls for approximately 10 feet before scouring the ravine it enters. Similar erosion occurs on Tributary 0006B where water is discharged from the Fred Nelson Junior High School across Benson Road to the top of a severely eroded ravine. An onsite detention facility downstream at the Victoria Hills housing development accumulates large amounts of sediment. Its capacity is decreasing, and the function of the facility is threatened. The development trends in this basin mean that land for regional R/D facilities will become more difficult to obtain at the same time that erosion and potential for flooding are increasing. Additional problems may arise if existing onsite R/D systems malfunction from improper design or construction or from lack of maintenance. An onsite facility for a privately developed trailer park, located west of the Benson Road adjacent to Garrison Creek, exemplifies the potential hazard. Unstable fill was placed on the steep ravine and an R/D pond built on its edge. The fill becomes saturated when the pond is in use, and tension cracks in the fill along the slope indicate potential failure. Such an event would add large amounts of sediment to the drainage system. Development may create similar problems elsewhere if the proper design, construction, inspection, and maintenance of R/D facilities is neglected. C. Specific Problems Identified Black River Basin exhibits serious problems throughout its system, with exceptions only in the south fork of Springbrook Creek and on Panther Creek in subcatchment 10. The most significant problems noted by the field team during its investigation are listed below. 1. Stream channel erosion accelerated by the routing of runoff from developed areas into streams. Major problems exist in the ravines, where streams are cutting into till at the upper ends of canyons and as.sociated landsliding and surface erosion occur (see section 3 below). Although these processes have been taking place naturally for a long time, increased runoff from developing areas on the plateau is causing acceleration of the erosion. a. The worst cases of erosion observed include those on Mill Creek (0005). P:BR/jr 5 • Black River Basin (continued) Garrison Creek (0022) and its tributaries (0023, 0024, and 0025), the north fork of Springbrook Creek (0021), and Panther Creek (0006). b. Prominent examples of gullying at drainage-structure outfalls are in Mill Creek (0005), Springbrook Creek (0021), Panther Creek (0006), and below Benson Road on both Garrison Creek (0022) and Talbot Creek (0006B). c. Examples of accelerated downcutting resulting from increased runoff from developing areas are located in Talbot Creek and two small streams (0064A and 0006C) in Renton. 2. Landstiding associated with stream erosion in ravines, as a result of steep slopes and saturated soils. Instability generally takes the form of rotational failures or debris slides triggered by stream undercutting. In many cases, natural instability is exacerbated by filling and/or by construction on canyon walls; for example, a new fill above Garrison Creek at Benson Road is failing, and old fills are being under- cut. All of the ravines should be considered landslide-hazard areas. The same is true of the bluffs at the western edge of the plateau, even though there have not been many problems yet. These are moderate to steep, landslide-susceptible slo- pes, especially in the northern (Renton) and southern (Kent) ends of the basin -- the area under the most development pressure. 3. Damage to (or destruction of) habitat due to: a. High flows and high velocities, which remove macrophytes and benthic orga- nisms, plants, insects, and possibly fish. Visible evidence of high velocities was noted on all the streams in this basin except the south fork of Springbrook Creek. b. Sedimentation from excessive erosion, which is filling pools, choking spawning gravels, and in some cases filling stream beds to the point of making channels impassible to fish. All of the four big stream systems in Black River Basin exhibit this problem. The Kent parks department annually removes 1,100 cubic yards of material from Mill Creek. A large sediment flow has filled the Springbrook Creek stream channel to a depth of approximately 5 feet, and Panther Creek just north of Valley General Hospital has a large alluvial fan. c. Visibly poor water quality: 1) Large amounts of domestic trash have been deposited in these stream canyons. Mill Creek has become a dump for appliances at river mile 9.60, and Garrison Creek appears to be more of a landfill than a creek at 1.30. Such practices have a detrimental effect on water quality as well as the visual quality of the environment. 2) Commercial and industrial enterprises are producing runoff that causes many streams to be oily, turbid, and sudsy. Springbrook Creek (Trib. 0005 at RM 1.30), flowing under the bridge of Southwest 16th Street just east of Longacres in Renton, is one of the worst examples noted. The Western Processing facility just upstream has been identified as a source of toxic wastes entering both surface and groundwater systems. P:BR/jr 6 • Black River Basin (continued) IV. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ACTION Habitat, erosion, landsliding, and flooding problems in the Black River Basin can be addressed by the measures identified below. Most of the solutions listed here will mitigate specific problems observed during field investigation or will prevent similar problems in the future. However, additional recommendations have been included to suggest administrative or regulatory measures that would increase the overall effectiveness of surface water management in this basin. A. Expand existing and/or construct additional regional R/D facilities on the plateau in order to control storm flows that originate there. Site facilities upstream of the four large creek ravines that are experiencing the worst damage. Facilities should be regional in scope and should follow the general specifi- cations outlined in Appendix A of this report. These will impede the direct conveyance of runoff into the steep, naturally erosive ravines, thereby reducing erosion rates that result in sediment transport and slope instability and that damage habitat. B. Preserve wetlands on the plateau to provide natural storage. In addition, reconsider Panther Lake for use as a regional R/D site. Although the lake has been classified as a #1-C wetland, the amount of storage it offers is substantial with a moderate addi- tional (.25-to .50-foot) fluctuation in depth. - C. Protect steep valley walls from erosion and landslides caused from direct discharges of stormwater: 1. Tightline discharges or provide other appropriate nonerosive conveyance over steep hillsides; provide energy dissipation at the outfalls. This has already been done at several points on Mill Creek (Tributary 0005) with good results. 2. Consider rerouting flow in cases where tightlining or other methods are not feasible. For example, runoff from the area southeast of Springbrook Creek might be piped down Southeast 200th Street rather than routed into the north fork (0021) as it is now. 3. Lower the potential for landslides by restricting development in and along the tops of ravines. In particular, strongly discourage filling along the edges; the fill at Benson Road above Garrison Creek (0022) will probably have to be removed. D. Reduce sedimentation in streams along the valley floor in cases where sedimentation is not adequately prevented by R/D and other upstream measures. In extreme cases (probably including Panther Creek [0006]), construct sediment traps (with convenient access for removal of accumulated material) at points where streams flow onto the valley floor. E. Increase enforcement of regulations against the dumping of domestic trash into ravines and stream channels. The Seattle-King County Health Department and the King County office of Building and Land Development should be asked to investigate this ongoing problem and to take appropriate action when violators are identified. P:BR/jr 7 Black River Basin (continued) C� F. Increase the overall effectiveness of surface water management in the Black River Basin: 1. Continue cooperative intergovernmental arrangements between the cities of Tukwila, Kent, and Renton; the Washington State Department of Transportation; and the King County Surface Water Management Division to identify and propose solutions to habitat and hydraulic problems in the basin. These efforts should include de- veloping cost-sharing agreements where capital improvements are required. 2. Evaluate and reduce, if appropriate, the volumes and rates of release for stormwater originating from developments. Present release rates and volumes are causing erosion, sedimentation and habitat problems. 3. Increase the maintenance and inspection of existing King County and city drainage systems to ensure that they are functioning properly. 4. Encourage public participation in maintaining water quality and in stormwater management in the basin, including citizen action projects to clean trash from streams and education about citizens role in maintaining clean water and stream systems. 5. Perform more detailed and comprehensive hydrologic/hydraulic analysis of all drainage systems within the basin to determine how the existing facilities will function under existing and future flows. 6. Prepare a comprehensive basin plan with participation by all agencies concerned with surface water management in the basin. The plan should assess the econo- mic, hydrologic, and habitat impact of individual projects on a basin-wide scale. t P:BR/jr 8 APPENDIX B OFF-SITE BACKWATER ANALYSIS Beginning Calculation Cycle Discharge: 0 . 32 cfs at node DET-1 Discharge: 0 .32 cfs at node J-1 ,' Discharge: 0 .32 cfs at node Outlet-1 Beginning iteration 1 Discharge: 0 .32 cfs at node DET-1 Discharge: 0.32 cfs at node J-1 Discharge: 0.32 cfs at node Outlet-1 Discharge Convergence Achieved in 1 iterations: relative error: 0. 0 ** Warning: Design constraints not met. ** Problem: Flooding in system Information: Outlet-1 Known flow propogated from upstream junctions . Violation: P-2 does not meet minimum velocity constraint. Information: J-1 Known flow propogated from upstream junctions. Violation: P-i does not meet minimum cover constraint at upstream end. Information: DET-1 Flooding condition. Calculations Complete ** Analysis Options ** Friction method: Manning's Formula HGL Convergence Test: 0. 001000 Maximum Network Traversals: 5 Number of Pipe Profile Steps: 5 Discharge Convergence Test: 0.001000 Maximum Design Passes: 3 Network Quick View Hydraulic Grade Label I Length I Size I Discharge 1 Upstream 1 Downstream I P-1 40. 00 12 inch 0.32 14.53 11. 63 P-2 78 . 00 24 inch 0.32 11. 63 11. 63 Elevations 1 Label 1 Discharge I Ground 1 Upstream HGL I Downstream HGL I DET-1 0. 32 14.30 14.30 14 .30 J-1 0.32 16. 90 11. 63 11. 63 Outlet-1 0 .32 16. 94 11. 63 11. 63 Elapsed: 0 minute (s) 3 second (s) Project Title:Unifirst Commercial Laundry Facility Project Engineer:Harold Peterson d:data\projects\trec0004\unifirst.stm StormCAD v1.0 10/01/97 04:39:49 PM Haestad Methods,Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 (203)755-1666 Page 1 of 1 S le Outlet- 1 P-2 j _ i • P- I DET- I Project Title:Unifirst Commercial Laundry Facility Project Engineer:Harold Peterson d:\data\projects\trec0004\unifirst stm StormCAD v1.0 10)02/97 07:48:07 AM Haestad Methods,Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06709 (2(33)756-1666 Page 1 of 1 Combined Pipe/Node Report ,.' Pipe Upstream Downstream Length Inlet Inlet Inlet Total Inlet Section Capacity Average Upstream Downstream Constructed Node Node (ft) Area C CA CA Discharge Size (cfs) Velocity Invert Invert Slope (acres) (acres) (acres) (cfs) (ft/s) Elevation Elevation (ft/ft) (ft) (ft) P-1 DET-1 J-1 40.00 0.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12 inch 11.27 1.35 14.30 10.30 0.100000 P-2 J-1 Outlet-1 78.00 N/A N/A N/A 0.00 N/A 24 inch 16.00 0.13 10.30 9.91 0.005000 Project Title:Unifirst Commercial Laundry Facility Project Engineer:Harold Peterson d:\data\projects\trec0004\unifirst.atm StormCAD v1.0 10f02/97 07:47:24 AM Haestad Methods,Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 (203)755-1666 Page 1 of 1 f• Outlet • P-7 J-4 rm P-5 J-3 P-4 J-2 P-3 • —DET-2 Project Title:Unifirst Project Engineer:Harold Peterson d:thaestad\stmc\uni.stm StorrnCAD v1.0 10/02/97 07:46:05 AM Haestad Methods,Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 (203)755-1666 Page 1 of 1 • Beginning Calculation Cycle , Discharge: 0. 89 cfs at node DET-2 Discharge: 0. 89 cfs at node J-2 ' Discharge: 0. 89 cfs at node J-3 Discharge: 0. 89 cfs at node J-4 Discharge: 0. 89 cfs at node Outlet Beginning iteration 1 Discharge: 0. 89 cfs at node DET-2 Discharge: 0. 89 cfs at node J-2 Discharge: 0. 89 cfs at node J-3 Discharge: 0. 89 cfs at node J-4 Discharge: 0. 89 cfs at node Outlet Discharge Convergence Achieved in 1 iterations : relative error: 0.0 ** Warning: Design constraints not met. ** Problem: Flooding in system Warning: No Duration data exists in IDF Table Information: Outlet Known flow propogated from upstream junctions. Information: P-7 Surcharged condition Violation: P-7 does not meet minimum velocity constraint. Information: J-4 Known flow propogated from upstream junctions. Information: P-5 Surcharged condition Violation: P-5 does not meet minimum velocity constraint. Information: J-3 Known flow propogated from upstream junctions. Violation: P-4 does not meet minimum cover constraint at upstream end. Information: J-2 Known flow propogated from upstream junctions . Violation: P-3 does not meet minimum cover constraint at downstream end. Information: DET-2 Flooding condition. Calculations Complete ** Analysis Options ** Friction method: Manning's Formula HGL Convergence Test: 0.001000 Maximum Network Traversals: 5 Number of Pipe Profile Steps : 5 Discharge Convergence Test: 0 .001000 Maximum Design Passes: 3 Network Quick View Hydraulic Grade Label I Length I Size I Discharge I Upstream 1 Downstream I P-3 155.00 12 inch 0.89 15 .40 12.48 P-4 100.00 12 inch 0.89 12.48 11.54 P-5 18.00 12 inch 0.89 11.54 11.53 P-7 60.00 15 inch 0.89 11.53 11.52 Elevations Label I Discharge 1 Ground I Upstream HGL I Downstream HGL I DET-2 0.89 15.00 15 .00 15.00 J-2 0.89 16.50 12.48 12.48 J-3 0.89 16.10 11.54 11.54 Outlet 0.89 16. 94 11.52 11.52 J-4 0.89 16.14 11.53 11.53 Elapsed: 0 minute (s) 4 second(s) Project Title:Unifirst Project Engineer:Harold Peterson d:Uiaestad\stmc uni.stm StormCAD v1.0 10/01/97 05:11:09 PM Haestad Methods,Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 (203)755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Combined Pipe/Node Report 1 r- Pipe Upstream Downstream Length Inlet Inlet Inlet Total Inlet Section Capacity Average Upstream Downstream Constructed Node Node (ft) Area C CA CA Discharge Size (cfs) Velocity Invert Invert Slope (acres) (acres) (acres) (cfs) (ft/s) Elevation Elevation (ft/ft) (ft) (ft) P-3 DET-2 3-2 155.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12 inch 4.89 3.08 15.00 12.08 0.018839 P-4 J-2 J-3 100.00 N/A N/A N/A 0.00 N/A 12 inch 4.90 2.11 12.08 10.19 0.018900 P-5 J-3 J-4 18.00 N/A N/A N/A 0.00 N/A 12 inch 2.52 1.13 10.19 10.10 0.005000 P-7 J-4 Outlet 60.00 N/A N/A N/A 0.00 N/A 15 inch 4.57 0.73 10.10 9.80 0.005000 Project Title:Unifirst Project Engineer:Harold Peterson d:\haestad\stmc\uni.stm StormCAD v1.0 10/02/97 07:44:47 AM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 (203)755-1666 Page 1 of 1