Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
LUA98-169
r--• ' L-L.4.— 0 , JIB .__ y \iii.Hof_:, -- �.. , — > •a./ — F _.. ji\, — e , , • , i- AI/ -IN- =31 24rd-- 41.-E= riri--- m ,` ,, i,,*, - . -___....._ _ / ,40 -.,,,,7 .___.: -= h.. * _,.._,._ t ,_ 0,,,, ______ mo-.ialli* # ' ,.. • — ,s\ ril"71111/ .7 \ W, \,--1-1 1, 0c\c' ____, Igo .-. mow !III i . n - ii, 00.4 PROJECT IIIIIIIIIIIIo i1 f 2 n d , ' , LOCATION ! I / —i Q �, ' �.�------- •_ Ica SAO ep Al ) -- �� Vo/ r.11 .` ill . h. - \\.\ ..:\1111111111'‘.\-\\N-", .117 ! 1 - ,) \ \ , N •• . - 7/ A \7\r_... 1 -1 (3..) Cl ›. _.i mow _ — =6 ----LI_ , --1--- b,% NW - -.. 1111111.11%.W -...------1--j LEE & ASSOCIATES . ..-, car . �1. VICIITIrI1Y MAH ,/4" DESIGNED: DK DATE: 1/98 FILE NAME:TS-V1C �Y„'�y' DRAWN: JL/CAD CHECKED: JL SCALE: 1'=200' nap am. PArt. 1 I I z• , • i n PLMMf L15f ...p.M�i i On'. NMI 51Zt CAt.D. REMARKS O2 MESt i.VPLe 0 -B' DO is _ :•:::::;:::•:.c...•i. • ...�: Chi: i, O 2"Cr. OD 1 y ' gr r 111, \y7 �... q / fi IL b C CNw I`.i.�t� r&ar l I Gal. I / I\\ / I \ / I \ .••3 ///l —' M�R tatr:+cddu 1 Gr. 96"oc. 111 �. 5• 1 1 p yT'�11 e.�iG•�•' 9 2 Wi4rI ERIA o.c. I %1 RIMER �'`�, . �,�,J' KwyxLFi "5<N�5 FLONCG rLUM • 1 p ` ... �Y! 1c�xu 1 IfJ.IfNJG i�i;' ® 2, P(/rr15e LNJEL 5 Gr. 5'o.c. LOf - -- - 1® 0 I RowtnCLr llsuar� 2':CJ. DO / l B RScddr.ae.•EEm R'Lode.'•V.4nto' 24"-70"5 Gal. ‘ -.r1Rf't 11 KI 11 0 2 pki64i-,--,zaVI i/t 6'-10' DD ACE SUNSET BLVD. N. (S.R. 900) 110 SCII-E II 20' �� 1;C1„Ettt t Nir `r,' RE AT 2/5TRte RT. • - 0r '/Mm�ftA O NI/5NNAE:v nu 1 - .t R M]I 5 iRC M. p y :MI%sQX fII �f5 li 5. ��. Fw L. Wiy� , ✓a .��C i 'I'. Nb Et&•5 OR 1NY5. CD e TomC�++OI'D/iL rip. rMo.2 RII m e —2"MI.Ot 1C7►V1R5511a:. fINS"GR/DC. �crt�ti ~a lnrtarp (�'t� O twirl," x mr. 2"NLL44 TOP Met II �rfrRO2[578 - , ��N�rLL. sg: l• t.\.fpta. —IIII—I '"4�.P4"l},Q" ►KLTED �_ - � i►�%''"�� IIII=Ii � �_.� IIII - p — I" Ko vtRrrvrc• ��: S% I a it �61:11 ` I`li_III 1rp1Gw+^ '1 _IIII .�r.a ��W, • nIII eDiNe IIII .�e• �� IIII P I_I. __ill( ii �- 1i,1 rAmts.^Je""r _.... F'011•V rrt I. MI xz µr�wwae .i fi I31 1 n. �g r�pyft L� fI3e5• R21/2 CN-. 9 wrrKDt - r5,MOVL DlR-M ON rG' 1CIt7UOU5 T1 PLANTING & 51AKIN6 CONIFN2 1Tre pLANfNG ANn STAKING N15 Nf5 ®. .... .- ::r• r•TI•.A M'1 a fr ' ",,,,,',LA.',11.t/, '•I re• 00x itl t.IJW,,I1*OD fire UN:.WA Cl1/: V e VT "IOU S.i^![!t[nra1l!GY F.:.i:'t L:1f.4tl�fe,+ y sDM 10R n.oca ORAw CDC UTIJ+DAsn MY WA:[S VKK IDA It[IWCR/IIT 4/Q rI CI'. I141'I WATER Krell / / *"'A,,? I illl�1111111 e. 16...DOXR .,�` ° 1041 .7 enLlr.s Dox '' / �` r!I tRWAT1oItd0.LT[ AWAY R3 / v, 'r'hr,CEI_ ri(3 ,.,,,,••; • Faro tt?r•.ICM � `/' . r?: .. .:....r:•.. Al x0 e /A .� •�:n Y; O ALL OrIEp[T N) O %AVCO lwt 1.%1Eer jf a •OlioIls't s T cA m..re-v ` _ J L� %r w.n.,vu •L JI NAB '04 eT..�D we L%leer j AL p?i. ^ • •} S . it yc)Er cr1.11.10.l a slur r 'I / . .. • taro, !Id FOX Bop ._iL31 m .n, *cur Tt01 •� p � r 791L./ �y. / • lTi. P/ yy �e irt.i[o LraONo w ✓e▪•WV OrtilDRON ITrOMO F l / a .000 tEr.c[ n.nl,Ry .,. /�',.!/ \ d Li'T• �}�t( /!S� —t1_,rant LK 4. f•' j11//I ntorof[o LYb.n.wo / �C•� alio, ni� /• (�SCE NOTES. —,.—••••0•L.%wu LK ♦ /1jI // \ S 1 / .,�' a� /Cl/! 17C3 M1Ny Kw COI CO- POW*.KR COR OCTAL LOOP] CppC O• COK.IC r[ i / \ \ `� j't[37"L[//.__ // LLVJK LYI)rW ORIKWA. MO MINI KW GARD.eVrT[t NO 00000r /t(i /r1 / \ • .�J 49 MIAu COI La.L DARROt Coln I J �.-•�_ 'ilk' / ' WAN(ExT)TM IAKtOIT MR COL OCTAL FCC* _�me( C•IAKICM r vI i L / / _ J° /• .'li4r //`• exnrrr.ow-KAo v Lln LKs s sNi a OW aeauo ,i _ II*IARxM COT rAYOpti Wm/D[ T OF AWN LL D OKI .O• C+TC %. `44 / �F\\ .T. 30 '•.40. 1,.- ' v7 n nor,.K 7T`„ / `,� \ , •I ••I ' Q . non / / '� �� Y/�, f• ""4 T; .j o VIM[uvAlld 7:)m,-'C'y\ I A• CIF, Or R000.KRTICN. Cpr0t0.0171 , CW.t.'• 1 Pi LOW_LOG CotD DE,sr OO DI • �i/ / h COO.,OM WA.DR 04C OK/ TK %h ,, V'J UDAR RIKR ._ 1.. / / CLLVATId••Ae•It r.AW w t/CRN• r / w w 3'.CFI BURIED UTILITIES IN AREA CALL BEFORE YOU DIG 1-800-424-5555 911.11.1.1 wMf J•v s.yy,:;%t v.-.•'‘..' h"M[�1MJf '• ..- MAX)100n •O, MfAO,OIA.) •.„ )MJav})U), •aryr UT.,ANA* •••• Q IM 0 JAY .dX r V.....•". ..• ` X) rel..,Ill' Z • • N JAv JOSTO,)W.,.b Sf A m I , •• '07.2 ,•••.1 \ :7 ))o.,.r.rarwr Or.,MaSS • ' w Q006 • •r 1 'Te t)as 110.211. ,N. 0 a ra,M )JaI oI a u -.•-.••}✓' r a .ar•f. SW.w1T Tx n L. — { .).)r':i�". ..�' /- w ^tij A foot•rJ,..r Grim It .-a). >L). • ;. O[ •1 .3.-A.X .:•).., M • t. '�'".` (�..r t .r,:�.C._I �T ;::Q r, \' t)ri.r oli__LW''07566,C • :• A a • 1 �., y gl,lU.1l !OM ��i- 2 .01 1 J•x VW! .WI'• O v u I.55..TI 1)0,OOo« • • \ , •} • • /�� \ �1•wD11a)} O.r.J}T uro,aaaWo—ra— ••.. It'� - 4. ]•J,Wrr—,r— .'\1 ,111T1iL- • ?.. a r / O / \ \‘ 1 .. AJ'LIMN',Moots!—Ae— � ''1\ \' ','"p `;• \ 0-.h tArp,Owl \.'":\t� `. t 6006 JAt ICI }OJ IT.AwT��X) .IWJ A,a.)W.D.JJ.tM \ I)\. ' •I♦ / • / \\ ; ,•• )I)L)OJ O ).0O) A.Nw XJIr Cm }fIT.A•.•Iw wa,JJ,TM:.,Awanp d1•Tr,0 740613 L 1• I•I,'\ ` / / \ OW f0,}A.0 Y03 Yl) JJAIM �•;.\J, \ '' \ \ ,' /JAW air .a00 M)J JJa,Oa `rt. \ • �`t / \ \ ''•\' . *waora,,p a.w_� •00,•JAT)0}0.1)a 00[1vA,061H[)AAl)} J\• 0.• .I \ • \ \ • 0.0}d 1)CMJ 30 1riK ra•J,T,JN tNr-}al0•M T r.67 ,•\\ \ ` \ J� fit. •\ JICJ O'• }WO 6 JJ rrara v t b J•wr,•01)eA,TOJ•MJ,M,w). -mil'' • a•J won Jr, `J,, • .atD,l.•p•- '!t. /�� 1 ` .v:'+"• Soon O5Kw, „ ` \ C� '' i�r -•t jC. .a • ./. \SII Ali.. \ 1 if•.0ST,0> JA.).,},M`•.3 11-)1,3C -A �Y. `� '- );1 .13 Jro1 l ,..4.,,,,....,...,,,..:,.:,,s•eT-u, a'o)a..tr J+io CO.) l)1 -"......� ,0• y • ,,:"".-I.:f...:.' O 00 ICA)to GNJ 30.) '. DS••I ` \••+ - H, })v0 a10)0 TA.,OA0.0 :n ♦ ` S)v.) MOL) l.• ' 1` 1•• MAW I,MIS.IO.rav1Jl iV 1` -!{C.i� :r�. ; 't w 'p I8c` • A3RA HI 231TIJITU 031AU6 010 UOY 390138 JJAJ 222t-. -006-I 1 J •a C ~ 1111kf bit , S ___ al.__ _. 1 Li] LH __ I il __ . L__ -I I_-- - -1 t= l_ J L J 1-_� /, r Ir'LiTC OM Y 046" IY ff. 0 ri_ II_ [I] .._ Lt___.] . 1191 I- I 1 I I I 1 I „.s._ NORTHWEST ELEVATION fl� N.0 fl0C1 Mom. INN NO Ill f LW % O ff e' I •f• + No IllYM! k •u M!Y fflf J, I fM"1C PPP'JUL C.01.6 - •.^11 C \1 K•Y11140,!0. CJ6111 CTof a 1 11 e1k.n,w.. _l..�i.Z ::OUTFIWEST ELEVATLFl C...%) ..... 412.31 ,,,A7 10,•.„..,..\ • NIO :IMIIIIIIIIII"Ill' ' '. /....,,t, •e'le 5..". i 1 ‘,.. ••i,1. . __ _ _ _ - - -.- -- - . „IA.4.... t-1.1•2,...1.1.1•..rP.3.,2.f......T.A O•M•A•N LI I1 rNi IMs , 1IlI 17 1. i [ Lt1 11111j I1 !•ii• AZdra.v1.1 if,0/22.12 ' _ 1 i 1 Li.._ 1 I - H ..., 1-----I [Till F--7 1--- 1 [ -„a,22, III 00.4 rpr/4° `,. , • ,_ 1_, I 1 1 i___1 ___ I /___- 1____I' li__ I_ i I 1 .,t,..4 fAIL4r a 1., 1 I F----I I 1 1--- - 1 I . . . 212 IOW. 140IT A V 3J3 Te3WHTROl11I - •I 9- I l• 140TI1311 144 • n Hi.... .,, i _12 it [i] v• i..i.!...!!!...9_._. nu,s.4.4 t• _.. -•- ----- . _____.. __. ___ _ ____ _ 1——_._______ • i il I 12222.2 22/2.12212411,2 22.21 I 2.,22 ..• II •••*4 22/2.122.11 n n).,,„..„..... IIC.IT AV31.3 Ti'AWIITUOZ: it:-,,.:± i. = :4-:, : ri- 1 o� ,I ' -. ass` 2 =r � �''num :�I :::. _ .,. ,;5 -a r- .1,41? !fp F...." . c_p' ,-; ''.. -''' r . ,7. . -=1. :11 WA ._. ...ft.L.:0 roi 0 ito 0 0 0 okt,,,,,,,.„, I ___ .:. *. ► .�d may, VV"Iij$ 1 2 III r / •0 . L___ na' Y' �, PROJECT , •I:, . F-- rN - '.� ; 4 . _ 4oc _ -, ,/ ••\ .= D��yea r---r-J._ , = —~+i. —Hi S. LEE do ASSOCIATES RENTON INI' VICINITY MAI — �..... % •q•wp1 r INNCIO•C�•O••.• / e V. RENTON MI 0 [E] [1] [ I ' WM Oa v I "_,I [1__ 11... i _ ___.___ L_ .- 111 l I L-____I L_—I l 1- -- -.. u s •• ED I aid 1••-lhi •••,.‘,...7.,•••:,•-•••V• • M l _-- -( I__—J l—1 l—_ L__ 1 1- ._l x•1••r+•s �. c 1.•,..••••w I 60 I UI I.. LI UI L I _] ui I fl n.lr • =� L. 1 L.___l L 1 L 1 L__1 I _ __ 1 r .. I -11 M �LMX t1••0 r- • ^.1,11THEAST ELEVATON _TQ � Li �.•..Ml w.• -• _. • 4 4 w41•1> NO TFITHEASI ELEVATION NOt;.►lil►rV2l FFFAV 11011 's, C ' !� ' .I 1 ' 1998 •.4.aI•• a ECEIVEI:% P ..< a•CY Y• .7c`.11►►FV<1 EFEA IIr'1I YIM j • I. I 1 __I I - I I ----I I I= - I I I � fd I I,i I•r,I I1I ICI IH I ) I� iIF! I i I I 111 � x._... . ... 1 ):4Xe.' I ;1•'' _ E I I-i ? I I 1Li,li! 11( -�_ I ii 1 Is I ►. 11rCYVR..I NYYISW •.y.tJS II R:. .... s6.4swD. .I.I I — _—_—_ _ 1 1.1 A _1 1 I bi 1 1 F - 1 1 1- r e a ♦I i .a•IL OM Y rI ...7 , i<at.c..., • 'wain...�w. ��w w.v.•: r... a .Y•a.rYa•oa,✓ct ru•.n..• I 11 ii 7 % .t ,1illx� vo . ! W H Wz J 0 11 piji•-. 4 it? '-•:, II 1,--T BIZmaliFT7 i=iiii:cis ---- . ,,)7 .---.-_-_-______J 1/.0> ___„,..40,..„ _ •. �I alW ` 1i ` 1 „I ' I i1 Nanyj TiI .1 1 •r N„ II •1 9�r Y-��� :I i � � ; Illi?1 I 1i IIW1 MM 1 'M�- 'Ilr a 1 a © CITY OF RENTON -- Planning/Building/Public Works `./r� � - N 1055 South Grady Way - Renton Washington 98055 EY 2`'`' g ^ 0 ,3 2 ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED rOSTAAE Kraght, Benjamin J. 22725 -91st Way S. Kent, WA 98031 1352301020 CI. DELIVERABLE AS AGGRESSED UNABLE TO FOR'IVAK) _. RETURN TC s{'aNT . 4.:4:t5' r i ReinTbvh lv,n Zv Ste" Edwars,Dwight W&Carol J f' Harvego,Carol Elizabeth Butenko,Christopher R+Bonit 17454 SE 192nd Dr. ; ` 1521 N 3rd St. 1525 N 3rd St. Renton, WA 98058 :' , Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055 1352300980 t. 1352300990 1352300995 r Sharma,Vishnu Deo Arnold,Bruse C. Green,Kaylene " 16442- 111th Ave. SE 208 Factory Ave.N. 204 Factory Ave.N. Renton, WA 98055 ' Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055 1352301000 ,' . 1352301010 1352301015 pg Kraght,Benjamin J. Wood,Arthur Wautlet,Raymond 22725-91 st Way S. 1510 N Brooks St 1520 N Brook St. Kent, WA 98031 " Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055 , 1352301020 1352301025 1352301035 Luong,Ha . Dunn Lumber Northwest RT Burlington Northrn Santa Fe 1522 N Brook St. P.O.Box 45550 TAX Department Renton, WA 98055 ' .', Seattle, WA 98145 1700 E Golf Rd#400 4 Schaumburg, I160173 1352301040 1352300875 1723059006, 1723059172, 1723059006 Bitney,Dean W . Golden Palace Colonel,Richard C 2727 Mt.View Ave.N t, , 151 Sunset Blvd.N P.O.Box 2192 Renton, WA 98056 0 Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98056 1723059174 1723059074 1723059273 Ciambrone,Robert J.+Tiffany Windsor Park Estates City of Renton 11517 NE 107th Pl. Charles Kaplan , 1055 S Grady Way Kirkland, WA 98033 i 11100 NE 8th St.#800 1: Renton, WA 98055 Bellevue, WA 98004 �' 1723059089 1723059090, 1723059091 1723059005 141 51 7 + 1.' r r CIT' OF RF,NTON (Sit) Nal ' Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator May 15, 2001 Patryce Bernhard Patryce's Espresso 11830 SE 318th Place Auburn,Washington 98092 Subject: Parking Modification Request Patryce's Espresso at Renton Inn 219 Sunset Blvd. N. Dear Ms. Bernhard: This letter is sent in response to your request for a modification from section 4-4-080.F of the City's Parking Regulations in order to site an espresso cart within a required parking space at the Renton Inn. The cart will be mobile and will not require a building permit,but will require State and City business licenses and King County Health Department approval. Section 4-4-080.F.d of the Renton Municipal Code allows the Administrator to grant modifications from the parking standards for individual cases provided that the modification meets the following criteria(pursuant to RMC 4-9- 250.D.2): a. Will meet the objectives and safety,function,appearance,environmental protection and maintainability intended by 14e Code requirements,based upon sound engineering judgment; and b. Will not be injurious to other property(s)in the vicinity;and c. Conform to the intent and purpose of the Code; and d. Can be shown to be justified and required for the use and situation intended; and e. Will not create adverse impacts to other property(ies)in the vicinity. The cart is proposed to be sited within an existing parking space at the Renton Inn,a 34-unit motel. The motel currently has 35 existing spaces on-site. The parking regulations require one parking space per motel unit plus one parking space for every 3 employees. According to the project description in the original Renton Inn land use file, LUA98-169,the motel would only have one employee on-site at any time. The motel site plan was administratively approved with a total of 35 required stalls. The cart use itself would require only a single parking space for a total combined parking requirement of 36 spaces. The modification request is to allow two parking spaces less than required by the parking regulations. Analysis a) Will meet the objectives and safety,function,appearance,environmental protection and maintainability intended by the Code requirements,based upon sound engineering judgment. The proposed cart would not project into any required aisle way or affect any existing landscaping. The cart will comply with King County Health Department regulations and should have no negative impact relative to the environment. The cart is mobile and will be moved into the motel each evening and could be easily moved in order to allow for parking lot maintenance. If approved,it would occupy only a single parking space. Due to the staggered nature of the parking demand times for each use,the requested modification conforms to the intent and purpose of the parking regulations by providing sufficient on-site parking of the amount unto 1901 2001 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, Washington 98055 0'h..?}.. y�(� ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer °f `e 11 r".\ Patryce Bernhard May 15,2001 Page 2 necessary for the site. The proposal would also meet the objectives and safety,function,appearance, environmental protection and maintainability intended by code requirements,based upon sound engineering judgment. b) Will not be injurious to other property(s)in the vicinity. The prime parking demand time for a motel is in the evening hours and the cart's operating hours are proposed to initially be 5:00 AM to 2:00 PM daily. In the future,depending on the success of the venture,the cart may be open as late as 7:00 PM. The Renton Inn currently has an off-season occupancy rate of 55%to 80% and a summertime occupancy rate of 70%to 90%. Therefore,a reduction of two parking stalls is not anticipated to negatively impact surrounding business properties. c) Conform to the intent and purpose of the Code. See discussion under criterion number one. d) Can be shown to be justified and required for the use and situation intended. The Renton Inn currently does not experience high parking demand during the day and typically more than half of the motel's parking spaces are open and available during the day. The adjacent business, Super Pawn,is open from 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM and has extra parking spaces during the evening hours. The owner of Super Pawn has agreed to permit the motel to use one of its parking spaces in the evening when the pawn shop is closed. e) Will not create adverse impacts to other property(ies)in the vicinity. As stated under criterion"a"&"b",the proposed parking should not create adverse impacts to other properties in the vicinity of the motel. Decision The proposed use of one of the existing motel stalls during the day would not create a negative impact on the parking situation in the area. Likewise omission of the additional parking stall that the new retail cart would have triggered is not anticipated to produce any parking shortages. The parking modification for Patryce's Espresso at the Renton Inn site is approved subject to the following condition: The parking modification approval is revocable by the City upon a showing by adjacent property owners,or upon determination by the City of Renton that parking shortages attributable to the lack of motel parking are occurring. Appeal Process:Appeals of this administrative decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM May 29, 2001. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required$75.00 application fee with:Hearing Examiner,City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office,(425)430-6510. Sincerely, 144106Prz--- Gregg Zimtnermarf,Administrator Planning/Building/Public Works Department cc: Jennifer Henning, Principal Planner Neil Watts, Development Services Division Director PATRYCE ' S EXPRESSO CITY OF RENTON RECEIVED MAY 1 1 2001' May 11,2001 BUILDING DIVISION Renton City Hall—6th Floor 1055 South Grady Way Renton,Washington 98055 Dear Mr. Neil R. Watts: I am writing in regards to obtaining a parking modification at the Renton Inn for the usage of a walk up expresso stand. I plan to occupy only one stall at the location (Diagram A). Furthermore, I have asked the neighbors of Renton Inn,i.e. SuperPawn to let Renton Inn's night manager use their parking, since the two businesses reflect different hours of operation. Sincerely, iiib\ \11, bAlio Patti a Bernhard Owner / Manager 42k . U Utz , 4U/kb ith \jVQ0041‘641 . jOrOAS,L 3,_SCLA A Lf\o-t).yyv".31-ki 4 . Qv , cam, O 0) AsDAymy\olszA 9 0) 5L, '' .-\--k-oi\k, w\c‘ Uiln aiV\K4Az Yatiathim v\citsj h-SU/W ANL -P"kii\ \43) OViii3 01" ‘A--kiki ckcpAtr,9_N- At ut\amwin iy\(,),,,J NA),,,, i-Vuou v),Nou\stS \Awl si_ catt\th. rx 'Jot 6u_ 0,14_ )1\6 sue, w o\. doun p, \Ki oat- vAp S . 5\\ i t b w , kir. wpw\wioi,.. 111 c4\13jakwo 11830 SE 318TH PLACE • AUBURN • 98092 1 1' V PHONE: 253-887-7982• FAX: 425-687-11 73 DT4C--)2--4, A • p. •V• •• • 7°' •:, r." - i V155 n 0. I AC 1 �- _ ...mime _ _ _ _ _� _ Le I / 1 ?: I L1L1 \i 0 E 1 _1_ ,10‘... J___ 4awk. ,1,,. -Q ,�•. % %i c . F� Mri GC 1•• 1 ` 41 c i :! • 1 ryr tV i• ... .... L_L� ,•� �.` ' :::: :i:i 1444 4 ke__ __ __ i !...1 iill 46 .ii r//.1.".1•.r•-.:•:A ,,.. e.- z -ram 0 0 •'• '� CITY, IF RENTON ••aZ Planning/Building/Public Works Department J e Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator January 12, 1999 Mr. Jae Lee Lee Associates 1822 Field Place NE • Renton, WA 98059 SUBJECT: Renton Inn Project No. LUA-98-169,SA-A,ECF Dear Mr. Tseng: This letter is to inform you that the comment and appeal periods have ended for the Environmental Review Committee's (ERC) Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the above-referenced project. No appeals were filed on the ERC determination. This decision is final and application for the appropriately required permits may proceed. The applicant must comply with all ERC Mitigation Measures and Site Plan Conditions of Approval. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at(425) 430-7270. For the Environmental Review Committee, 2(catij47-K)--\7 • Lesley Nishihira Project Manager cc: Mr. Ming Tseng/Owner FINAL.DOC 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, Washington 98055 :: This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF.SERVICE BY MAILING On the 286 day of lec.ew oer , 1998, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Qe`'O av Qcc.t,S(Nia documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing V\ Av L. -TSekNol lac. Lee. (Signature of Sender) S50.0..lct._ k Sccl-er STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that ex-rA ZA,n , S e� {�..� signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for ttfe uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: vac. 3/ /ef) 9�5��iyn,e_c Notary Publi and for the State of thington Notary (Print) MAFVLYN KAMC! ICrf My appointment exppi e COMMISSION EXPIRES 6/29/99 Project Name: evkirvt IV\v Project Number: L IcZ `(b1 , Sty _w r ELe NOTARY.DOC REPORT City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works DECISION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW& ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION DECISION DATE: December 15, 1998 Project Name: Renton Inn Applicant: Ming L. Tseng Owner: Same as above File Number: LUA-98-169, SA-A, ECF Project Manager: Lesley Nishihira Project Description: The applicant is proposing to construct a 34 unit motel totaling approximately 14,458 square feet in gross floor area. The ground floor square footage of the building is 4,866 and is 3 stories with a height of 40 feet. The project will include 35 parking stalls as well as landscaping. The existing buildings on the site will be demolished. Project Location: 219 Sunset Boulevard North Exist. Bldg. Area SF: To be demolished Proposed New Bldg. Area SF: 14,458 sqft Site Area: 20.063 sqft Total Building Area SF: 14,458 sqft -g er , 7 RIP -1 ; NM 1 jitjahlinittillmmil.;, c_t/ ,:,\ ,1411.11 Kw.010 ,._.,... ,., , #40;m1 •ft- phig,,, ittirw ' ,, 40,,N.11, If •_# sT, p howl w4; - PAilitaiti* r -L 24, / PROJECT r�/�i!�I LOCATION f lailli fir.:' i-- / ( L...__ .___...,,,�.: ?O/P 141111111\i' ..1.: 1 .\_1 IV -:: ..,___\-----7 „, ,,, -Fp _ ..._ rt, .,111,) le 1 1%6, ,.i H,.. I,. lit __A _ 1 Ii 1 Project Location Map SITERC.DOC • • City of Renton PB/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Environmental Review Committee Staff Report RENTON INN L UA-98-169,SA A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF DECEMBER 15,1998 Page 2 of 9 PART ONE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND The applicant and owner, Ming L. Tseng, is proposing to construct 34 unit motel on a .46 acre site situated on two adjacent parcels. The motel will be three stories in height, 40 feet, with a total gross floor area of 14,458 square feet. The ground floor square footage of the building will be 4,866 square feet. The proposal includes 2,441 square feet of landscaping around the perimeter of the property as well as 35 parking stalls, two of which are ADA accessible. A manager's unit and an office will be located in the proposed structure. There are currently seven buildings on the subject site--the former Rubber Duck CB store and Yoko's Teriyaki, in addition to an office building, a storage building, and three buildings used for rooms for the existing motel. The proposal includes the demolition of all existing buildings on the site. The proposed development will have a total impervious area of 17,589 square feet, approximately 427 square feet less that the existing area of impervious surface. The proposal requires SEPA environmental review as well as administrative site plan approval. PART TWO: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW In compliance with RCW 43.21C.240, the following project environmental review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. A. Environmental Impacts The Proposal was circulated and reviewed by various City Departments and Divisions to determine whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed development. Staff reviewers have identified that the proposal is likely to have the following probable impacts: (1) Fire Prevention Impacts: The proposal will add new construction to the City which will potentially impact the City's Fire Department. A Fire Mitigation Fee, based on a rate of $0.52 per square foot of new construction, applies to all new construction in the City. The mitigation fee is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall pay the applicable Fire Mitigation Fee at the rate of $0.52 per square foot of new construction. The Fire Mitigation Fee is estimated at $7,518.16 and is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. Policy Nexus: Environmental Ordinance (SEPA), Fire Mitigation Fee Resolution and adopting ordinance. (2) Transportation Impacts: The proposal will result in an increase in traffic trips and is therefore subject to the City's Traffic Mitigation Fee. The proposal will generate approximately 25 new average daily trips. The Traffic Mitigation Fee is calculated at $75 per each new average daily trip • City of Renton PB/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Environmental Review Committee Staff Report RENTON INN LUA-98-169,SA A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OFDECEMBER 15,1998 Page 3 of 9 based on the ITE manual. The fee is estimated to be $11,436.00 (152.48 trips x $75 = $11,436). The fee is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall pay the applicable Traffic Mitigation Fee at a rate of$75 per each new average daily trip attributable to the project. The Traffic Mitigation Fee is estimated at $11,436 and is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. Policy Nexus: Environmental Ordinance (SEPA), Transportation Mitigation Fee Resolution and adopting ordinance. B. Recommendation Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommend that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINATION OF DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE NON- SIGNIFICANCE- MITIGATED. Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. XX Issue DNS-M with 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period with a Concurrent 14 day Appeal Period. C. Mitigation Measures 1. The applicant shall pay the applicable Fire Mitigation Fee at the rate of $0.52 per square foot of new construction. The Fire Mitigation Fee is estimated at $7,518.16 and is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. The applicant shall pay the applicable Traffic Mitigation Fee at a rate of $75 per each new average daily trip attributable to the project. The Traffic Mitigation Fee is estimated at $11,436 and is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Fire Prevention 1. The preliminary fire flow is 1750-2000 GPM based on the total square footage of the building. One fire hydrant is required within 150 feet of the building and one additional hydrant within 300 feet of the building. 2. Separate plans and permits are required for the fire alarm and sprinkler systems installation. Plan Review- Surface/Wastewater 1. Drawings to meet City of Renton Drafting standards. 2. A sewer cleanout to be provided 5 feet out from the building. 3. Show roof drain connection into system for storm drainage. 4. The sewer system development connection charge is $521.66. 5. No charge for storm system development connection. City of Renton PB/PWDepartment Administrative Site Plan Approval&Em nental Review Committee Staff Report RENTON INN L UA-98-169,SA A,ECF • REPORT AND DECISION OF DECEMBER 15,1998 Page 4 of 9 Plan Review- Water 1. One fire hydrant is required for each 1,000 GPM of required fire flow. Therefore, two fire hydrants are required for 1750-2000 GPM of required fire flow. 2. The water system development connection charge is $2,267.12. Plan Review- Transportation 1. Need to show parking stall dimensions on construction plans. 2. The plans are to comply with the City of Renton's drafting standards. Building 1. 1997 Uniform Building Code arch stamp, engineering stamp, soils report. Elevator lobbies, one hour construction. Planning 1. Underground sprinkling systems are required to be installed and maintained for all landscaped areas. The sprinkler system shall provide full water coverage of the planted areas as specified on the plan. 2. Wheel stops are required for all parking stalls on the periphery of the lot. The wheel stops must be two feet from the end of the stall for head-in parking. 3. Employee and compact parking stalls are required to be marked. All makings are to be of commercial traffic paint or equal material and are to be maintained in a legible condition. 4. Separate permits must be obtained for any proposed signage. Police 1. The most common occurring crime at locations such as this are theft from motor vehicle. Precautions should be taken to prevent this by having appropriate lighting in and around the parking areas. During and following the construction phase of this project, appropriate "No Trespassing" signs should be posted. All auxiliary entrances/exits should be security-accessed only (preferably security cards in lieu of keys). All units should have solid doors with deadbolts and peepholes for additional security for residents staying at the motel. PART THREE: ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION - REPORT & DECISION This decision on the administrative land use action is made concurrently with the environmental determination. A. Type of Land Use Action XX Site Plan Review Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Conditional Use Binding Site Plan Special Permit for Grade & Fill Administrative Code Determination B. Exhibits The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing: application, proof of posting and publication, environmental review and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No. 2: Drawing No. 1, Site Plan (Received November 25, 1998). Exhibit No. 3: Drawing No. 2, Building Floor Plan (Received November 25, 1998). SITERC.DOC City of Renton PB/PWDepartment Administrative Site Plan Approval&Envinental Review Committee Staff Report RENTON INN LUA-98-169,SA A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF DECEMBER 15,1998 Page 5 of 9 Exhibit No. 4: Drawing No. 3, Building Elevation (Received November 25, 1998). Exhibit No. 5: Drawing No. 4, Landscape Plan (Received November 25, 1998). C. Consistency with Site Plan Criteria In reviewing the proposal with respect to the site Plan Approval Criteria set forth in Section 4-31- 33(D) of the Site Plan Ordinance, the following issues have been identified by City Departmental Reviewers and Divisional Reviewers: GENERAL CRITERIA: a. Conformance with the comprehensive plan, its elements and policies; The site is designated Employment Area - Commercial (EAC) on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. The EAC designation is intended to provide for commercial and residential uses requiring large amounts of land and/or high visibility and access to large volumes of automobile traffic in areas outside of Centers and Center Downtown designations as well as ensure quality development in employment areas. The proposed development is consistent with this designation. The proposal is consistent with the following Employment Area - Commercial policies: Policy LU-168 - Employment Area - Commercial designations should only be located on, and have access to, streets classified as major arterials or above. The property has direct frontage to Sunset Boulevard NE, which is designated a major arterial on the City's Arterials Map. Policy LU-169 - Individual parcels should be encouraged to consolidate to maximize flexibility of site design and reduce access points. The applicant is proposing a lot line adjustment concurrently with the site plan approval that will consolidate the two adjacent parcels on which the proposed development is located. The proposal also includes the replacement of the two existing driveway entrances with one driveway in order to reduce access points to the property. Policy LU-176 - Increased demand for commercial uses should be accommodated through redevelopment and intensification of Employment Area - Commercial designations rather than expansion of those areas. The proposal is for the redevelopment of an existing motel and restaurant. The development will increase the amount of motel units as well as create a better lot design on a currently underutilized site. b. Conformance with existing land use regulations; The subject site is located in the Commercial Arterial (CA) zone. The proposed use, a motel, is a primary permitted use in the CA zone. The proposed development will have a height of approximately 40 feet and a 24% lot coverage by buildings. The proposal is under the maximum height level of 50 feet and maximum lot coverage of 65% permitted in the CA zone. The CA zone requires a minimum 10 foot building setback from the front property lines, as well as from arterial streets. The proposal includes a 78 foot setback from Sunset Boulevard NE, an arterial. The garbage collection area proposed is not adequate per code requirements and Waste Management Standards. The refuse and recyclable standards of the code require a minimum gate opening width of 12 feet and vertical clearance of 15 feet in order to provide reasonable access to collection areas for hauling vehicles. The site plan submitted is showing a gate opening of 8 feet. Furthermore, Waste Management will require pickup service three times a week with 4 yard wheel SITERC.DOC City of Renton PB/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Em rental Review Committee Staff Report RENTON INN LUA-98-169,SA A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OFDECEMBER 15,1998 Page 6 of 9 dumpsters for a collection area such as this. As a condition of approval, the applicant will be required to revise the site plan to accommodate the required 12 foot gate opening width. A screening detail plan will also be required. The detail plan will need to provide dimensioned elevations as well as a description of the materials to be used for the screening fence. Both plans will be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of building permits. The applicant will also be required to arrange for garbage collection three times per week at the site. The landscape requirements of the CA zone call for a minimum width of 10 feet along street frontages. A 10 foot wide landscape strip which includes street trees and shrubbery of adequate size and spacing is proposed along Sunset Boulevard for the majority of the property's frontage. The applicant is proposing a reduction of this requirement to 5 feet for the property frontage at the Northeast corner of the site only. However, further revisions to site plan in order to accommodate the required 12 foot width for the garbage enclosure may require the elimination of the landscaped setback for the property frontage at this portion of the site. The CA zone allows for the reduction of this requirement to zero feet through the site plan review process. Without the reduction, the applicant would not be able to meet the required parking for the use as well as provide an adequate garbage collection area on the site. As a condition of approval, staff will recommend that the landscape strip at the Northeast corner of the site only be reduced to zero feet. The revised site plan will be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of building permits. The proposed plan is showing a sign within the required landscaped setback along Sunset Boulevard NE and within the site triangle. In the CA zone, freestanding signs are required to have a minimum setback of 10 feet from the property line to the base of the sign. The sign may project into the required setback a maximum of 6 feet. In addition, signs are prohibited within 20 feet of intersections or driveways. As a condition of approval, staff will recommend the site plan be revised to eliminate the sign from the plan or to show the sign in an appropriate location. A separate sign permit must be obtained for all proposed signage. The CA zone also requires a pedestrian access connection from a public entrance to the street. Staff will recommend as a condition of approval that the applicant submit a revised site plan showing a clear, direct, pedestrian walkway connecting the entrance of the building to Sunset Boulevard. The revised site plan will be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of building permits. The parking regulations require one space per unit plus two spaces for every three employees. The proposal includes 35 parking stalls, 2 of which are ADA accessible stalls, for the 34 unit motel. The applicant contends there will only be one employee on the site at all times. Therefore, only one space is required in addition to those provided for the units. The employee space is required to be marked to clearly designate the space for employees. c. Mitigation of impacts to surrounding properties and uses; The subject site is surrounded by a variety of commercial developments, including retail service shops and restaurants. The proposal is to redevelop a site currently occupied by a motel and restaurant and construct a new 34 unit motel. Although the number of units will increase, the redevelopment of the site will not create any significant impacts over those currently existing to surrounding properties or uses. The site plan submitted does not show the existing 16 foot strip of City owned property at the rear of the site. The applicant will need to revise the site plan to show the City owned property and the correct boundary for the Burlington Northern Railroad property. The revised site plan will be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of building permits. SITERC.DOC City of Renton PB/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Environmental Review Committee Staff Report RENTON INN LUA-98-169,SA-A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF DECEMBER 15,1998 Page 7 of 9 d. Mitigation of impacts of the proposed site plan to the site; The proposal is not expected to adversely impact the site. There is no increase in impervious surface proposed over what is currently existing. Construction activities related to the proposed development will be required to utilize best management practices which will reduce potential construction impacts to the site. Currently, there is a dividing property line running perpendicular to the right-of-way through the site. The two adjacent parcels are under the same ownership and the proposed development will place the structure on the larger lot and utilize the smaller parcel for parking. In order to prevent the future sale of the parcels separately, staff will recommend as a condition of approval that the applicant record a lot line adjustment which removes the dividing property line and joins the two adjacent parcels into one lot. The applicant may also record a restrictive covenant which will prohibit the sale of the properties separately. e. Conservation of area-wide property values; The proposal will allow for the redevelopment of an existing motel in order to fully utilize the potential of the site. The proposal is anticipated to conserve property values in the vicinity. f. Safety and efficiency of vehicle and pedestrian circulation; There are currently two driveway entrances to the site off of Sunset Boulevard. The proposal will eliminate these driveways and construct one entrance 21 feet from the property line. The parking stall dimensions and aisle widths meet the minimum requirements of the parking regulations. The proposal does not present any impacts to vehicular circulation to and from the site. However, the CA zone requires a pedestrian connection from the entrance of the building to the street. Staff will recommend as a condition of approval that the applicant provide a direct, clear, and separate pedestrian connection in order to mitigate the potential impacts to pedestrians on the site. g. Provision of adequate light and air; The proposed development will allow adequate light and air circulation to the existing building and the site. h. Mitigation of noise, odors and other harmful or unhealthy conditions; The subject site is currently fully developed with the same use as the proposal. Noise and odor impacts in the vicinity will not have a significant increase over the existing development. The proposal is not expected to create any harmful or unhealthy conditions. Noise, dust, and odors which may result from the temporary construction on the site will be mitigated by the construction mitigation plan. i. Availability of public services and facilities to accommodate the proposed use; and The subject site is adequately served by public services and facilities. j. Prevention of neighborhood deterioration and blight. No deterioration or blight is expected to occur as a result of this proposal. XX Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. citron nnn City of Renton PB/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Em nental Review Committee Staff fReport RENTON INN LUA-98-169,SA-A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OFDECEMBER 15,1998 Page 8 of 9 D. Findings, Conclusions & Decision Having reviewed the written record in the matter, the City now enters the following: 1) Request: The Applicant has requested Environmental Review and Site Plan Approval for the Renton Inn, File No. LUA-98-169, SA-A, ECF. 2) Environmental Review: The applicant's file containing the application, State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation, the comments from various City departments, the public notices requesting citizen comment, and other pertinent documents was entered as Exhibit No. 1. 3) Site Plan Review: The applicant's site plan application complies with the requirements for information for site plan review. The applicant's site plan and other project drawings are entered as Exhibits No. 2 thru 5. 4) Comprehensive Plan: The subject proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Employment Area - Commercial. 5) Zoning: The Conditional Use as presented, complies with the zoning requirements and development standards of the Commercial Arterial Zoning designation. 6) Existing Land Use: Land uses surrounding the subject site include: North: CA zoned property (Pawn Superstore); East: Sunset Blvd N and CA zoned property; South: CA zoned property (Hair Salon, Massage and Spa, Restaurant); and West: Railroad Right-of-Way, CA zoned property, R-8 residential property. E. Conclusions 1) The subject proposal complies with the policies and codes of the City of Renton. 2) The proposal complies with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Commercial Arterial; and the Zoning designation of Employment Area - Commercial. F. Decision The Site Plan for the Renton Inn, File No. LUA-98-169, SA-A, ECF is approved subject to the following conditions. CONDITIONS: 1. The applicant shall submit a revised site plan showing a clear, direct, pedestrian walkway connecting the entrance of the building to Sunset Boulevard. The site plan must also be revised to eliminate the proposed sign in the required landscaped setback. The revised site plan will also be required to show the City property located at the rear of the site and the correct boundary for the Burlington Northern Railroad property. The site plan must be revised to show 12 foot gate openings for the garbage collection area and the reduction of the landscape strip at the Northeast corner of the property to zero feet. SITERC.DOC City of RentonPB/PWDepartment Administrative Site Plan Approval&Env iental Review Committee Staff Report RENTON INN LUA-98-169,SA-A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF DECEMBER 15,1998 Page 9 of 9 The revised site plan will be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. The applicant shall submit a screening detail plan showing elevations and building materials of the proposed screening for the garbage collection area. The screening detail plan will be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of building permits. 3. The applicant shall record a lot line adjustment which removes the dividing property line on the subject site or record a restrictive covenant which prohibits the sale of the properties separately. This shall be accomplished prior to the issuance of any occupancy permits. 4. The applicant shall provide a 4 yard dumpster with wheels on the site and arrange for adequate garbage collection with Waste Management. EFFECTIVE DATE OF DECISION ON LAND USE ACTION: SIGNATURES: // 1Z .' .Z J James C. Hanson, Zoning Administrator date TRANSMITTED this 28th day of December, 1998 to the applicant and owner: Ming L. Tseng 219 Sunset Boulevard N Renton, WA 98055 Jae Lee Lee&Associates 1822 Field Place NE Renton, WA 98059 TRANSMITTED 28th of December, 1998 to the following: Larry Meckling, Building Official C. Duffy,Fire Prevention Neil Watts, Public Works Division Lawrence J.Warren,City Attorney South County Journal Environmental Determination and Land Use Decision Appeal Process Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3),WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM January 11, 1999. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. SITERC.DOC • 8,ASI5 F' :,,E�ARINC•75 ®_ N6R+s2nv 56R+n::ct; LEGEND RCR,lO A OtLT I4'AE'T FaM>MASS ft:Xi ;Y�' • ro• PHC•E DOR M LOW. 4 MU:I. UNC.Si KAT ,\ Y.IT:'a'RI:MONIRI RR N S; \.OF IIAAO OWA UP UTILITY rOLE N. \ 1 SIGN '`,' me FLOOR GRAM \ \ Lbe CATCH WSM 'I, y/V• WATERVALVE / Mq FIRE HYDRANT f Q\ \. IIII 'II I'II wN. ,� WATER NETne 11 J / t ',AN, III 1III II'I.1I:PJI NO. NAIL/SOI wj,Q S6MS.'E .�'S' p STREET LIGHT ../. B VTLITDS DO% 1 / /1 ` t \' // GRm EI IRRIbAT10N coma_VALVE ' l rFYAt I/ 1 o GREASE TRAP 1 / INC. \ ti '',48•, -,, ow GAS METER / i h .` \`..tl' WD SANITARY NAHNaI.e / 41� / /FM:X. 14. \<14, • Faso NNEI4ADNr J. // . i/ �/ �``'`�`� / 171°'OS-'7oa 01 •\ AS NOTED r 's '�.: SCALE IN FEET O SET REDA"MO CAP 43 4.SL I/ �\. I/f2' s" COYLY-SO >O O ]O J STAYED lNR LSI3D6 IMD w x COM=NA_\''(/� I J p SET rI/wASIQ / roo ` T/ A. `, a w GO,. p STAYED lOR LS•Jb6r J :Y'J" � \ F:.iV :Rtr: SCALE f• 70' POUR AlEj LAP /•r r/ � ~� 4+ \ • NOT AGGVTEDI L �- �yI� / I;41IG4.♦ ~. ._4143`L f ®• NOT Ac[ErTFvire Deco 17 U LF or 6"f,/VC 5AN wit ;' { / /�— Jt !• 1- tT TY sr0 RE'LLAU DY)// CAP PER CI OF,•RENTEN STANOARU r/ / \\\ \` •' GONG. j Rs- 16'WOCO FENCE RITICNJ j i / / \\\'''' �. !/li ; —STORK LINE f^. PROPOSED •DSRS.FF.J1.0 �P t„S`/:f ,�,i{1.nnC� T! 'I/ Z. / �• \ / ;' % (1/�� NOTEY —34—SANITARY SEWER LME I `K t� / \ \\ / ., ,y a 7 I'W ORENC LINE / �'{ W / \ / 1S +;� 3. /1'rO INSTALL NEW CEIR GONG.DRIVEWAY PR CAR.DETAIL FOOT.] IQ.� :1 / ;st". ROOVE EXISTING DRIVEWAY MO INSTALL NEW C RO.GVTTR AND SIDEWALK / T / \ A�f A INSTAL cell CONC.CARRIER U.IRO EDGE d<GOILRCTE r/ I j(�'.r�I a it/ INSTALL CEO CONC.SIDEWALK /, ,/ / S • / Sf /� REPAIR EXISTING PAVEMENT PEW CAR.DETAIL FOOD i �/, _ % '/ .r • J i! WORE OF rAK1EM 44.1 / y 1 ?� - (.. EXISTING OVER-IEAD UTILITY LOWS SHALL RE IR(JER GROUO �1 r m // / V� / t/ OCAS NEW PARKING LOT PAYMENT SHALL DE Y OF ASPTR Cl.b'OVER 4"OF CSTc f�`\�t i --(\\ IE .,. / a •/j 4 �//; h TC T!X OF CA" 8q--tt�,�'' 999 FL FLOW LME / i ��\ ' ,/7 %/a rr re FwnHm noon /(' lyw re LA LA—' r' .�N., }k/j/ .t. '� 09 WOW ELEVATION 1/f / f ;$a ', / / i /; ...� , ', 7,/' i fCO / PAR;..tt E4. • w05 Nii.i / DENGH MARK. T• t • CITY OF RENTON VERTICAL CaNTROL1471 / 44' / •• E•40 , CG5 DISC STAYED X T64-PDT / 4./ •�" I1 IN COIL.COTO AT EAST END CI /x. / MOONSEN IYWEAOVERY ORIO6E OVER THE / k 1 I Si.� '''• /r ELEVATION.44]6 FT.I Aw MI • / ''',4,/c , J., M YL FILLED ram PR2 IN GCSE; BURIED UTILITIES IN AREA CALL BEFORE YOU DIG 1-800-424-5555 A . • '... AMARAL T COMPOLTICN 269242LE ROCELG,TYR. La OVER RA OPER.*CEDAR ARC CP TOLER ROSE n,STIR 24 NM R2C1 Soma TIP n n ir arm/eon eert e.,TPR ROIND FALLP GAZER PENT roe e•ShIVFON1 nen,TYR •I- .____ _ TOPER 2 11021 s s ARV OP RE*02 MY 0 . ........./.... * 0 i i * ..„ ..,.. ik 62 MAR I,MGM 111/ 0.1 NC[AMR ,seecnecurae, RENTON INN -; 'MD PLR 2 1103, — • 0 LORTAT ten,EFT 1 IL 0 1 , „1- _,1, 1, ›.....,TIP ExCEFT AY RcorDLesT ELEPATZN ,,,,,E,A0c...9TTROE00/1 TRH ARMED i 1 4— Fill • '1 1 _ e: ea I I I I I TEL$1,110001 Sbl,Dr/F. t t.MD Foe DP WI , 1 1 20 FLR 2 2121 ,4%-naruz-E-Ftn— M NEAVAC 1.2AT,7Tr. - H . —1 1 . . _ MU WALKWAY ROOT LEE Or— 1 I PRILCTERAL FOR CONSTRUCT. I.NaR RAMO , :2 LOWER ROCP I I I I I I I I I I I I 1.1 —1• (1 —12 t..LEO FLR ER 5102 I I NO* 5.SISTPLR2 W21 __:',......„..1 FE LAMER.2.TIRE'X'DOA I ! 1 EGRET § ! 1 4--i FE , ,...„,„.._...,.. IIE I I ..ti PIRLDILRAL 91.00 HID h — • — CalidDt 05 7--- FLOE. KEY WELT. SOUTHEAST ELEVATION _.. --„., ,AM C2 RIDGE IPA b 0 *ERD FLR 2 WM k,,,,DEC PLR 2P 22.2 I 4 1..-20 PLR.FAD WI 1 1 § 1 I 7ND FLR SP MDR ,..6.4 4'IT FIR 2 ELL § 4 4 , , 414CTLIPAL226 6 RAD 440 \ NORTHTHEAST ELEVATION • 1 rJ u a 6r ,6 So ♦ Are%OF ROUE AN L o 16 1 I] 1 j _. _ .03RO FLR a 1033 [ 4—, 1— r I-- 1--- _-.- � f..__ _.--I F . .._. I f -- JJ r'_3I Ellvanar ulL. ERR BF.iI➢ . n 1 ... _ - I - _ 0'Inert,vRYL CR J — - i_ J J - B SAR NI EIEVAnpI m I r .__ _ __.._ ----- — ELEVArCN QRT 1ST FLRre 51]III �Inert,LrP.hNB 306 C /. _I 1 _ 1 E-_ L J _____ ___ _ -__.__._ ____ _ SIRCRIRAL BLAB 40 . .___ �� I GRAM 435 NORTHWEST ELEVATION yea a RENTON Art OF RIDGE36b, INN 0 3160 RR IS 1033 % H II 6:0 0 0 II m 16 + —y 3RO RR SS.6R➢�t I\ r m 60 - U 1 T1D RR SF.l31W 1 ' - RI FLR re 5211 V-REFER 10 STRUCTURAL ORAYROS \ k FOR CANCPa AID OAU:WAT ROOF CA381neCrm I / :I^• �• / STRIOI10. 440 SOUTHWEST ELEVATION JJ ARROW L�L�gS�F�E�U�3 MA55 PLANT u5r 12 T10 HIG-1 MA OTV. NAME Size CONE,. REMARKS ' ;e. ;5.p. --— :::-- - :- 2 Acer pd� .n 6'-8' DD 1-1:1i. ... :Ai 1A'Al' SE matMAPLE 1 '�"' 5 Acar rubn.n'Pad Sweat d.' 2"C DO I . O R W En SSEr MA'Le - ... fC )71` fi 'NZ - ir .. 6 Ilex v-Nc em 111:i 1' I Gal. '6"o.c. I / I\ / 0 /I \ I I \ / 1 \ / I � /�j asregTJAA11vl 12 M tarl�lxlfdle I C.a. 561'ac. I_ p1 'I. TYPE-1rekik11TER 4;f 8 /YYX K�EImA 2 alai. 5'o.c. �I jl / '� : 0 I Pnrus5er�il� 'Kral V 8' DD KRAUTER VESIMUS FLOJrRICi�PLUM I I TYPE N i( �.::. PPS i �� 24 pkan NFL 5 O . 5'o.c. -- - 1® 0 1 Fyn. CHATITalcl EE LL PE weer' 2"Cal. PO //Cif ilk r'. 0 8 Tblododendren'Loder'5 WMte' 24"_50"5 Gal. TYFT 11 -- TYRE y���I �y-�{ I�d '^"'"EE ACE FRONTAL �-./ 2 EIv1ERALD Pla30RVITAE 8'-10' DD SUNSET BLVD. N. (S.R. 900) SCALE I"-20' 1406E R HOSE E - - �,� ',,-��lili, rf- ,, . "!' TIE Al 2/5 TREE Hr. -`I�j;r;�- ZX2 STAKES STANEV W r0P 7 Ri3K nPld.DROWf�NAf, •-_- , qI4ir� G111'Wl� rE Al 2/5 ilffie Hr. E FIJLLG SµOIL W/50% X S 2 XRMY i .ES. AIMPOR1En TOPSOIL. NO ROCKS OVER I". NO 12ED65 ORNATyWOS. 1bn,TOP OFQ2ME FL - f�MO�,p Of M / tlyr —2"MILO1 TOP 171M56NG. 2"MILCH TOP PRE _ 111 XO/P W9V-POIGVEN I F�M B 5 IX % XISf. -Ar45 5r0 py 55 p(�:,I-, DACKFILLcompAc CRIDE IIII rw or BAuFtI�g1 6ACKF„L I1�111111 /r` ;�% IIIII III Wtt1FM15HCXADE VERIFV PIT nRAI —IIIII— —ire IIII I_'1' r:i`� =111!r Nen IIII=IIII ,i '.IIIII VII \`z;,�Io•� 11111 III TTHAN6Pii.O IIIII,1111�/ ,IIIIIIIII BALL 1111111' ` Illlllii-11 E 115� OI EL = JJ MPxre. III—�� IIII': AS DELpyy, PLA, IIII_.IIII-IIIII=IIIIIME IIII Ild- 5%7- II DAL-ON COMPACTS _ _ _ I_ III nub1111111'III DACKELL MIX, = VE v PLlPJf Prf ROMP STAKES 12'' ° NS. I, _, lei '� 1 `III— MIN.�IMlO5L550LL B -1111-I TII""-IIIIIII111111 1I0ES DER 21/2F MgM.B�. 5144d'ENE0 E REMOVE DIR-A'ON TOP I/2 OF['ALL. I7CII2UOU5112 pLAN11N6 & STAKING, CONIF�12 1-M PLANTING ANP STAKING IJfS N.r.5. CITY OF RENTON....... ... ...... CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION' AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 2.gti) day of Decevytber , 1998, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing etc. d etevwit rukttervt 1 documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing Department of Ecology Don Hurter WSDOT KC Wastewater Treatment Division • Larry Fisher Washington Department of Fisheries David F. Dietzman Department of Natural Resources Shirley Lukhang Seattle Public Utilities Duwamish Indian Tribe Rod Malcom Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Joe Jainga Puget Sound Energy (Signature of Sender) 51,..KC i& • STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that .eat -le€46," 9?r_ c&o�� signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and volu Itary act forLthe uses and purposes • mentioned in the instrument. Dated: ► a.I 3 11 Q374m,,� Notary Publi 'n and for the State ouvvashington Notary (Print) .MARILYN KA,'1: !-I FFF My appointment expires• COMMISSION hXNllibS 6/29/99 Project Name: M h Project Number: L.%)t _cig '(ogi ' S 'ecr NOTARY.DOC 411 CITX )F RENTON „lL Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator December 17, 1998 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Subject: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on December 15, 1998: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED RENTON INN LUA-98-169,SA-A,ECF The applicant is proposing to construct a 34 unit motel totaling approximately 14,458 square feet in gross floor area. The ground floor square footage of the building is 4,866 and is 3 stories with a height of 40 feet. The project will include 35 parking stalls as well as landscaping. The existing buildings on the site will be demolished. Location: 219 Sunset Boulevard North. Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM January 4, 1999. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. If you have questions, please call me at (425) 430-7270. For the Environmental Review Committee, Lesley Nishihira Project Manager cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division Larry Fisher, Department of Fisheries David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources Don Hurter, Department of Transportation Shirley Lukhang, Seattle Public Utilities Duwamish Tribal Office Rod Malcom, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (Ordinance) Joe Jainga, Puget Sound Energy AGNGY•''' \ 1055 South Grady Way- Renton, Washington 98055 CIT' )F RENTON MINIM..IL ' ' Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator December 17, 1998 Mr. Jae Lee Lee Associates 1822 Field Place NE Renton, WA 98059 SUBJECT: Renton Inn Project No. LUA-98-169,SA-A,ECF Dear Mr. Tseng: This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) and is to advise you that they have completed their review of the subject project. The ERC, on December 15, 1998, issued a threshold Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with Mitigation Measures. See the enclosed Mitigation Measures document. Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM January 4, 1999. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. The preceding information will assist you in planning for implementation of your project and enable you to exercise your appeal rights more fully, if you choose to do so. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at (425) 430-7270. For the Environmental Review Committee, (241.44/,9 Lesley Nishihira Project Manager cc: Mr. Ming Tseng/Owner Enclosure DNSMLTR.DOG 1055 South Grady Way -Renton, Washington 98055 This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES AND CONDITIONS APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-98-169,SA-A,ECF APPLICANT: Ming L. Tseng PROJECT NAME: Renton Inn DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing to construct a 34 unit motel totaling approximately 14,458 square feet in gross floor area. The ground floor square footage of the building is 4,866 and is 3 stories with a height of 40 feet. The project will include 35 parking stalls as well as landscaping. The existing buildings on the site will be demolished. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 219 Sunset Boulevard North MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. The applicant shall pay the applicable Fire Mitigation Fee at the rate of$0.52 per square foot of new construction. The Fire Mitigation Fee is estimated at $7,518.16 and is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. The applicant shall pay the applicable Traffic Mitigation Fee at a rate of$75 per each new average daily trip attributable to the project. The Traffic Mitigation Fee is estimated at $11,436 and is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. The Site Plan for the Renton Inn, File No. LUA-98-169, SA-A, ECF is approved subject to the following conditions. CONDITIONS: 1. The applicant shall submit a revised site plan showing a clear, direct, pedestrian walkway connecting the entrance of the building to Sunset Boulevard. The site plan must also be revised to eliminate the proposed sign in the required landscaped setback. The revised site plan will also be required to show the City property located at the rear of the site and the correct boundary for the Burlington Northern Railroad property. The site plan must be revised to show 12 foot gate openings for the garbage collection area and the reduction of the landscape strip at the Northeast corner of the property to zero feet. The revised site plan will be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. The applicant shall submit a screening detail plan showing elevations and building materials of the proposed screening for the garbage collection area. The screening detail plan will be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of building permits. 3. The applicant shall record a lot line adjustment which removes the dividing property line on the subject site or record a restrictive covenant which prohibits the sale of the properties separately. This shall be accomplished prior to the issuance of any occupancy permits. 4. The applicant shall arrange for garbage collection at the site three times per week with Waste Management. A letter or contract from Waste Management establishing this pickup service will be required prior to the issuance of building permits. DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-98-169,SA-A,ECF APPLICANT: Ming L. Tseng PROJECT NAME: Renton Inn DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing to construct a 34 unit motel totaling approximately 14,458 square feet in gross floor area. The ground floor square footage of the building is 4,866 and is 3 stories with a height of 40 feet. The project will include 35 parking stalls as well as landscaping. The existing buildings on the site will be demolished. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 219 Sunset Boulevard North Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Fire Prevention 1. The preliminary fire flow is 1750-2000 GPM based on the total square footage of the building. One fire hydrant is required within 150 feet of the building and one additional hydrant within 300 feet of the building. 2. Separate plans and permits are required for the fire alarm and sprinkler systems installation. Plan Review- Surface/Wastewater 1. Drawings to meet City of Renton Drafting standards. 2. A sewer cleanout to be provided 5 feet out from the building. 3. Show roof drain connection into system for storm drainage. 4. The sewer system development connection charge is$521.66. 5. No charge for storm system development connection. Plan Review- Water 1. One fire hydrant is required for each 1,000 GPM of required fire flow. Therefore, two fire hydrants are required for 1750-2000 GPM of required fire flow. 2. The water system development connection charge is $2,267.12. Plan Review-Transportation 1. Need to show parking stall dimensions on construction plans. 2. The plans are to comply with the City of Renton's drafting standards. Renton Inn LUA-98-169,SA-A,ECF Advisory Notes (Continued) Page 2 of 2 Building 1. 1997 Uniform Building Code arch stamp, engineering stamp, soils report. Elevator lobbies, one hour construction. Planning 1. Underground sprinkling systems are required to be installed and maintained for all landscaped areas. The sprinkler system shall provide full water coverage of the planted areas as specified on the plan. 2. Wheel stops are required for all parking stalls on the periphery of the lot. The wheel stops must be two feet from the end of the stall for head-in parking. 3. Employee and compact parking stalls are required to be marked. All makings are to be of commercial traffic paint or equal material and are to be maintained in a legible condition. 4. Separate permits must be obtained for any proposed signage. Police 1. The most common occurring crime at locations such as this are theft from motor vehicle. Precautions should be taken to prevent this by having appropriate lighting in and around the parking areas. During and following the construction phase of this project, appropriate "No Trespassing"signs should be posted. All auxiliary entrances/exits should be security-accessed only (preferably security cards in lieu of keys). All units should have solid doors with deadbolts and peepholes for additional security for residents staying at the motel. CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-98-169,SA-A,ECF APPLICANT: Ming L. Tseng PROJECT NAME: Renton Inn DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing to construct a 34 unit motel totaling approximately 14,458 square feet in gross floor area. The ground floor square footage of the building is 4,866 and is 3 stories with a height of 40 feet. The project will include 35 parking stalls as well as landscaping. The existing buildings on the site will be demolished. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 219 Sunset Boulevard North LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM January 4, 1999. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: December 21, 1998 DATE OF DECISION: December 15, 1998 SIGNATURES: )9 Zi e cl � z/� _ / / 9� Greggmmerman, Ad istrator DATE / Department of Planning/Building/Public Works 7/<77k- Jim Shepherd, Fldmmis r'�for DATE Community Services Lee Wheeler, Fire C ief DAT Renton Fire Department l� DNSMSIG.DOC CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES AND CONDITIONS APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-98-169,SA-A,ECF APPLICANT: Ming L. Tseng PROJECT NAME: Renton Inn DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing to construct a 34 unit motel totaling approximately 14,458 square feet in gross floor area. The ground floor square footage of the building is 4,866 and is 3 stories with a height of 40 feet. The project will include 35 parking stalls as well as landscaping. The existing buildings on the site will be demolished. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 219 Sunset Boulevard North MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. The applicant shall pay the applicable Fire Mitigation Fee at the rate of$0.52 per square foot of new construction. The Fire Mitigation Fee is estimated at $7,518.16 and is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. The applicant shall pay the applicable Traffic Mitigation Fee at a rate of$75 per each new average daily trip attributable to the project. The Traffic Mitigation Fee is estimated at $11,436 and is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. The Site Plan for the Renton Inn, File No. LUA-98-169, SA-A, ECF is approved subject to the following conditions. CONDITIONS: 1. The applicant shall submit a revised site plan showing a clear, direct, pedestrian walkway connecting the entrance of the building to Sunset Boulevard. The site plan must also be revised to eliminate the proposed sign in the required landscaped setback. The revised site plan will also be required to show the City property located at the rear of the site and the correct boundary for the Burlington Northern Railroad property. The site plan must be revised to show 12 foot gate openings for the garbage collection area and the reduction of the landscape strip at the Northeast corner of the property to zero feet. The revised site plan will be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. The applicant shall submit a screening detail plan showing elevations and building materials of the proposed screening for the garbage collection area. The screening detail plan will be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of building permits. 3. The applicant shall record a lot line adjustment which removes the dividing property line on the subject site or record a restrictive covenant which prohibits the sale of the properties separately. This shall be accomplished prior to the issuance of any occupancy permits. 4. The applicant shall arrange for garbage collection at the site three times per week with Waste Management. A letter or contract from Waste Management establishing this pickup service will be required prior to the issuance of building permits. DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-98-169,SA-A,ECF APPLICANT: Ming L. Tseng PROJECT NAME: Renton Inn DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing to construct a 34 unit motel totaling approximately 14,458 square feet in gross floor area. The ground floor square footage of the building is 4,866 and is 3 stories with a height of 40 feet. The project will include 35 parking stalls as well as landscaping. The existing buildings on the site will be demolished. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 219 Sunset Boulevard North Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Fire Prevention 1. The preliminary fire flow is 1750-2000 GPM based on the total square footage of the building. One fire hydrant is required within 150 feet of the building and one additional hydrant within 300 feet of the building. 2. Separate plans and permits are required for the fire alarm and sprinkler systems installation. Plan Review- Surface/Wastewater 1. Drawings to meet City of Renton Drafting standards. 2. A sewer cleanout to be provided 5 feet out from the building. 3. Show roof drain connection into system for storm drainage. 4. The sewer system development connection charge is $521.66. 5. No charge for storm system development connection. Plan Review- Water 1. One fire hydrant is required for each 1,000 GPM of required fire flow. Therefore, two fire hydrants are required for 1750-2000 GPM of required fire flow. 2. The water system development connection charge is $2,267.12. Plan Review-Transportation 1. Need to show parking stall dimensions on construction plans. 2. The plans are to comply with the City of Renton's drafting standards. Renton Inn LUA-98-169,SA-A,ECF Advisory Notes (Continued) Page 2 of 2 Building 1. 1997 Uniform Building Code arch stamp, engineering stamp, soils report. Elevator lobbies, one hour construction. Planning 1. Underground sprinkling systems are required to be installed and maintained for all landscaped areas. The sprinkler system shall provide full water coverage of the planted areas as specified on the plan. 2. Wheel stops are required for all parking stalls on the periphery of the lot. The wheel stops must be two feet from the end of the stall for head-in parking. 3. Employee and compact parking stalls are required to be marked. All makings are to be of commercial traffic paint or equal material and are to be maintained in a legible condition. 4. Separate permits must be obtained for any proposed signage. Police 1. The most common occurring crime at locations such as this are theft from motor vehicle. Precautions should be taken to prevent this by having appropriate lighting in and around the parking areas. During and following the construction phase of this project, appropriate "No Trespassing" signs should be posted. All auxiliary entrances/exits should be security-accessed only (preferably security cards in lieu of keys). All units should have solid doors with deadbolts and peepholes for additional security for residents staying at the motel. AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Charlotte Ann Kassens first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of the SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL 600 S. Washington Avenue, Kent, Washington 98032 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE a daily newspaper published seven (7)times a week. Said newspaper is a legal RENTON,WASHINGTON newspaper of general publication and is now and has been for more than six months The Environmental Review Committee Non- prior (E to the date ofpublication, referred to, printed andpublished in the English language Sig C)has issued a tedfornthe n followingof 9Significance - Mitigated for the continually as a daily newspaper in Kent, King County, Washington. The South County project under the authority of the Renton Journal has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the Municipal Code. RENTON INN State of Washington for King County. LUA-98-169,SA-A-ECF The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the South County Environmental review for construction of a motel.Location:219 Sunset Blvd.North. Journal (and not in supplemental form) which was regularly distributed to the subscribers Appeals of either the environmental during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a determination (RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680) and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 LUA-98-169,SA-A, ECF PM January 4, 1999.If no appeals are filed by this date,both actions will become final. on: 12/21/98 Appeals must be filed in writing together as publishedwith the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, WA The full amount of the fee ch ed for said foregoing publication is the sum of$42.07 1055 South Grady Way, Renton re ov- 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are gov- Legal Number 5563 erned by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office,(425)430-6510. Publication Date:December 21,1998. Legal Clerk, South County Journal Published in the South County Journal G} December 21,1998.5563 Subscribe and swo efore me o t s -6 day of (-,4&_4---/ q 19 < / 0 `,{{{II111Iflib * s tiHF Notary Public of the State of Washington �o� �9FN`P residing in Renton NOTAgy • King County, Washington _._. _ c ��9 9 jO�BL\� o '��9� CN 1 0 :1��4%c '�'��v�IfW ASN;�NN NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. RENTON INN LUA-98-169,SA-A,ECF Environmental review for construction of a motel. Location: 219 Sunset Blvd. North. Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM January 4, 1999. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. Publication Date: December 21, 1998 Account No. 51067 , NOTICE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: RENTON INN PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-98-169,SA,A,ECF The applicant is proposing to construct a 34 unit motel totaling approximately 14,458 square feet in gross floor area. The ground floor square footage of the building is 4,866 and is 3 stones with a height of 40 feet The project will include 35 parking stalls as well as landscaping. The existing buildings on the site will be demolished. Location:219 Sunset Boulevard North. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. APPEALS OF EITHER THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION[RCW 43.21.0075(3),WAC 197.11-680) AND/OR THE LAND USE DECISION MUST BE FILED IN WRITING ON OR BEFORE 5:00 PM JANUARY 4, 1999. IF NO APPEALS ARE FILED BY THIS DATE,BOTH ACTIONS WILL BECOME FINAL APPEALS MUST BE FILED IN WRITING TOGETHER WITH THE REQUIRED 575.00 APPLICATION FEE WITH: HEARING EXAMINER,CITY OF RENTON,1055 SOUTH GRADY WAY,RENTON,WA 98055. APPEALS TO THE EXAMINER ARE GOVERNED BY CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 4-8-11B. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE APPEAL PROCESS MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE RENTON CITY CLERICS OFFICE,(425)430-6510. Impearyl --, twataty if .--- . rHirritor), ' J gi i .1 v_,Lyv, ,, / 4,6s IW' /. \atlOtftli oit -.__ .,, ,,L-,____,..,,,„ z,..,,,, ------1,1. -,, irg LJZJ1!;.'j ASSOCIATES RENTON INN VICINITY MAP FOR FURTHER INFORMATION,PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON,DEVELOPMENT SERVICES AT( 430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE DIVISION WITHOUT)PROP R AUTHORIZATION I - Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. CERTIFICATION I, 1,eS k ) 1 J i-a ch j , hereby certify that copies of the above document were posted by me in 7j conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on Wtiltc,(1,6,y 1 � rL eYv(O-w f , lqW Signed: ?19i /7- s) ) ATTEST: Subcribed and sworn before me, a Nortary Public, in and fo a State of Washington residing m 140.,, ,on the 3 t day of lag e • l ci p • MARILYN KAMCHEFF COMMISSION EXPIRES 6/29/99 .. ..." A,1 tlYJIPAM flews. : NOTICE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: RENTON INN PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-98-169,SA-A,ECF The applicant is proposing to construct a 34 unit motel totaling approximately 14,458 square feet in gross floor area. The ground floor square footage of the building is 4,866 and is 3 stories with a height of 40 feet. The project will include 35 parking stalls as well as landscaping. The existing buildings on the site will be demolished. Location: 219 Sunset Boulevard North. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. APPEALS OF EITHER THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] AND/OR THE LAND USE DECISION MUST BE FILED IN WRITING ON OR BEFORE 5:00 PM JANUARY 4, 1999. IF NO APPEALS ARE FILED BY THIS DATE, BOTH ACTIONS WILL BECOME FINAL. APPEALS MUST BE FILED IN WRITING TOGETHER WITH THE REQUIRED $75.00 APPLICATION FEE WITH: HEARING EXAMINER, CITY OF RENTON, 1055 SOUTH GRADY WAY, RENTON, WA 98055. APPEALS TO THE EXAMINER ARE GOVERNED BY CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 4-8-11B. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE APPEAL PROCESS MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE RENTON CITY CLERK'S OFFICE, (425)430-6510. tefiiII14ç':. \ w : .'. 12..-Edri wIrlimolvt„ 17--wr--,-4 rkg Imo -# 1 m i ,__. 51 ,,_ _,Li ,,t, PROJEPROJECT, LOCATION 6 / M __ `jam% 16;Pirris7N/_--„_.: i; —7--„:7-_-:-.z..„1, , ,,5,.,, l, LEE Lt i.SSOCiA.TES RENTON INN VICINITY MAP FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT(425)430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please include the project.NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. City o. .___nton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 101i COMMENTS DUE: DECEMBER 09, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-169,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: NOVEMBER 25, 1998 APPLICANT: Ming Tseng PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nishihira PROJECT TITLE: Renton Inn WORK ORDER NO: 78459 LOCATION: 219 Sunset Boulevard North SITE AREA: 20,063 sq.ft. I BUILDING AREA(new expansion gross): 14,458 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting SEPA environmental review and administrative site plan approval for a proposed 34 unit motel. The existing buildings on the half acre site will be removed and replaced with one, three-story building. The height of the building is 35 feet with a ground floor square footage of 4,866. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics • Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation • Environmental Health Public Services X _ Energy/ Historic./Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet 7.48 CFS Annually The most common occuring crime at locations such as this are theft from motor vehicle. Pre- cautions should be taken to prevent this by have appropriate lighting in and around the park- ing areas . During and following the construction phase of this project, appropriate No Trespassing signs should be posted (example attached. ) All auxillary entrances/exits should be security-accessed only (preferablly security cards in lieu of keys . ) All units should B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS have solid core doors with deadbolts and peepholes for additional security for residents staying at the motel . C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. ' t, `i.. Date Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Rev.10193 DEVAPP.DOC Trespass111"111H:ellril-nn USINES Enforcement WATCH • Quite often, business owners and managers are faced with crimes that occur on the property after the businesses are closed and the employees have gone home. Some of the crimes that occur are burglary, vandalism, graffiti, trespassing, drug dealing and robbery in the parking lots. There is a way for police and business owners to discourage these types of crimes from taking place on private property, and that is by enforcing the City of Renton's Municipal Trespass Code 6-18-10. In order for police to be able to make an arrest for Trespass, business owners or managers need to purchase signs and display them in conspicuous areas on the property. These signs need to include the following language: 1. Indicate that the subject property is privately owned and; 2. Uninvited presence on the specified property is not permitted during the hours the business is closed, and; 3. Violators will be subject to criminal sanctions pursuant to Renton City Code 6-18-10. MOST IMPORTANTLY-THE SIGNS SHOULD BE CONSPICUOUS FROM ALL POSSIBLE POINTS OF ENTRY TO THE PROPERTY, AND ALSO BE PLACED ON THE EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDINGS. This way when a suspect is arrested, he/she will not be able to claim as a defense that he/she did not know he or she was trespassing. EXAMPLES FOR TRESPASS SIGNS: NO TRESPASSLNG NO TRESPASSING This is private property. Persons without specific No Trespassing after business hours business are not authorized to be on the premises between (insert specific times). Anyone on the the hours of(insert the hours your business is closed). premises after business hours is subject to Violators are subject to arrest and/or citation for criminal arrest and/or citation for Criminal Trespass pursuant to Renton City Code #6-18-10.. Trespass and/or impoundment of vehicle. Per Renton City Code #6-18-10. By enforcing the Trespass Ordinance, business owners and police will be sending a message to criminals that they are not allowed to conduct criminal activity on the property. In making arrests for Trespass, police may be preventing the more serious crimes from taking place. COURTESY OF RENTON POLICE DEPARTMENT CRIME PREVENTION UNIT 4-.� 235 - 2571 City or Kenton Department of Planning/Building/Public v✓orks ENVIRONMENTAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Co• `vuc.fi,yt setAitce6 COMMENTS DUE: DECEMBER 09, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-169,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: NOVEMBER 25, 1998 APPLICANT: Ming Tseng PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nishihira PROJECT TITLE: Renton Inn WORK ORDER NO: 78459 LOCATION: 219 Sunset Boulevard North 1 SITE AREA: 20,063 sq.ft. BUILDING AREA(new expansion4oss): "4,458 sq.ftA 1 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting SEPA environmental review and administrative site plan approval form proposed 34 unit motel. The existing buildings on the half acre site will be removed and replaced with one, three-story ,iilding. The height of the building is 35 feet with a ground floor square footage of 4,866. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS v,04/ Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS ( A f G (/1 S`f d✓c-c.'r l tA 1 ) I (S ferofF . v ( d (010 • cs vl limo ciof c ✓i 5 (( Jc ,t�1s t/L We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. (7 6, I / 11'5 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 City or Kenton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works • ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Tv-tL la•},,.,_ COMMENTS DUE: DECEMBER 09, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-169,SA-A,ECF `�'� DATE CIRCULATED: NOVEMBER 25, 1998 ,� APPLICANT: Ming Tseng PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nishihira t` ttir PROJECT TITLE: Renton Inn WORK ORDER NO: 78459 LOCATION: 219 Sunset Boulevard North Q ` 2 Wt , SITE AREA: 20,063 sq.ft. BUILDING AREA(new expansion gross): 14',455$tsq.ft. 98 v SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting SEPA environmental review and administrative site plan appro<rigiAor a proposed 34 unit motel. The existing buildings on the half acre site will be removed and replaced with one, three-story buildi d% The height of the building is 35 feet with a ground floor square footage of 4,866. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation —Animals Use Utilities _ Animals Transportation L/- Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS r NNerd/ ` t to “.1 Lr'� r d-1- jai. ,-t t eJ� % [( C.'.- . J 'lat.r -- t.?zC� 1 U t-i 4' '� Ci•" Y1 S I- v u C t C 0 v, p ( `cam--L-c�-�j r C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS r 1 o to Gi'7 A-Sr-y Li `n%�- 7 7-4.; . t�J ; 'Fe -,,1 l' l h 7 C f' f-� h �._ } �Z is We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. y q Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC / Rev.10/93 • CaY � a,k �o•.» zr»� r a T t sP.QRTAio :1'V fr O FEE <•Y`>" ry:a�frw'.ro•+a.w;-,... wc,ri,;asxrr.•vr�iL.:�a.+vw..Cw..no.n-. ..+w • Project Name ReKtO N I N VI Project Address 2-Ic( 5uNStt F3M' • rV Contact Person Sete Lee. Address I a �2- Fieltt ?) /'J E Phone Number (206) - 4R2- 2730 • Permit Number LOA - cis?- 14q Project Description 3 4 to l t motel . ;A. ( 3 5 ,okra s oaceS xls�i ail 51-1( - o to lion l 4 °lilt hat 1150 t retail f .64D4 resrtauvaw7. Land Use Type: Method of Calculation: I 5� 3ZJ ❑ Residential 0 ITE Trip Generation Manual 114,cvn7r ❑ Retail 0 Traffic Study ,oast,(ON 1v .c. c1u�/y Non-retail Er Other - • -7.67 trips /w► ou. vaowt Calculation: Total exist, da►)� t`v,1s -77470 ott, "at (1)1(1.55) -1- (0•4190(S1,4i)(0,29) f (I.25o)(75.42)(o.L5) = y$.33 tV,ps 10!�e - 4,56/241 uu(A D illw lisps -iv) completed silt develo pt4vt 2a story (430- 81,e1 itzt, woo., (34)(7,47)(0.77) = 200, '8 I da14y 7r,Ps • 2e10 p✓i►«avr IV 7` lug) c4a,I y tv,ps a (too, i; (1I► ) - .33) = 152. 4 8 da►1 tviPs �ctuil (9ao) 2yel , ,o0orx wiari ( 152.0)05) = 11 ) L13) Transportation Mitigation Fee: 40 , 436. 6)0 Calculated by: Ndb() Date: Iz Z c� Account Number: t9 •- Date of Payment City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: s1/41.4,facel W . ec COMMENTS DUE: DECEMBER 09, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-169,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: NOVEMBER 25, 1998 APPLICANT: Ming Tseng PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nishihira PROJECT TITLE: Renton Inn WORK ORDER NO: 78459 2,.0P/iEJOON vI�� LOCATION: 219 Sunset Boulevard Northj/ SITE AREA: 20,063 sq.ft. BUILDING AREA(new expansion g k. 14,458 sq.ft9&99g SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting SEPA environmental review and administrative site plan ap fgva proposed 34 unit motel. The existing buildings on the half acre site will be removed and replaced with one, three-story 11SS The height of the building is 35 feet with a ground floor square footage of 4,866. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet e ' dt" ' t >L ( EF: Gt ( `/` l<eti-Li-c, t ) r �. 5f dALc -4. ) r> B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS a A 5-,C-4-1., er-. Cie J. vi o e. .n �v E 5 7q", ©L t Ciro /^,--i• r ® e3 © f d -s a t c( t,, �_ I 4 -r-=-®-ti-, ,r:, Sys-f-eiv>,-) fa F s D } W L d v 3 F vi C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS cnN N ec iii 011 1\_10 C (--1 a y-e$ e cis- 5+0v- ,, S i Sf�r�� Ile 2. p ' e- C e 4") We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to property assess this proposal. / 0 Authorized Re t sentative Date� /// Signature of Director o r Au h p DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 Cl to City c. .._nton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: DP. Iay\ Revs W '"-COMMENTS DUE: DECEMBER 09, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-169,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: NOVEMBER 25, 1998 APPLICANT: Ming Tseng PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nishihira PROJECT TITLE: Renton Inn WORK ORDER NO: 78459 r, f1r• LOCATION: 219 Sunset Boulevard North SITE AREA: 20,063 sq.ft. BUILDING AREA(new expansion gros's): 14,458 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting SEPA environmental review and adminrsiptye site plan approval for a proposed 34 unit motel. The existing buildings on the half acre site will be removed and replaced with ofre Oree-story building. The height of the building is 35 feet with a ground floor square footage of 4,866. �r yr(-" lJ A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet m 0 Ile, (/J P t Y' e, /%' ci c-7/ � 0 ! heAre- cv� � 7�i-vo (,z) ftYe l �' vz �c d s '7—� �/lre��� l 7 .7 kki E-d cJI' `�' ��f� B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS • • • C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS 0 s y 5 7 Ems-- IJ te;- ,ram C e, 6 ei We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: F�Y� prevevourvk COMMENTS DUE: DECEMBER 09, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-169,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: NOVEMBER 25, 1998 APPLICANT: Ming Tseng PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nishihira PROJECT TITLE: Renton Inn WORK ORDER NO: 78459 LOCATION: 219 Sunset Boulevard North „ 5 'MOP SITE AREA: 20,063 sq.ft. BUILDING AREA(new expansion gross): 14,458 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting SEPA environmental review and administrative site plan approval for a proposed 34 unit motel. The existing buildings on the half acre site will be removed and replaced with one, three-story building. The height of the building is 35 feet with a ground floor square footage of 4,866. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources _ _ Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet II� �,/ 14,000 Feet ;& NiJ o t- /i.(C1-3 • if).fe/ B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS ` d C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS a f/ucL," 09Ansi Cs2 5 We have reviewed this ap ication with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional informati n is needed to petty assess this proposal. 00� Signature of Director Authorized Representat Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 �Y S O CITY OF RENTON FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU MEMORANDUM DATE: November 30, 1998 TO: Leslie Nishihara, Planner FROM: Jim Gray, Assistant Fire Marshal 4 • SUBJECT: Renton Inn Project, 219 Sunset Blvd. N Fire Department Comments: 1. The preliminary Fire flow is 1750-2000 GPM based on the total square footage of the building. One fire hydrant is required within 150 feet of the building and one additional hydrant within 300 feet of the building. 2. A fire mitigation fee of$7,518.16 is required based on $.52 a square foot of the building square footage. 4. Separate plans and permits are required for the fire alarm and sprinkler systems installation. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. City o. ,._nton Department of Planning/Building/Public vVorks ENVIRONMENTAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: tr,...0V\ tc Ue0p a OMMENTS DUE: DECEMBER 09, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-169,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: NOVEMBER 25, 1998 APPLICANT: Ming Tseng PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nishihira PROJECT TITLE: Renton Inn WORK ORDER NO: 78459 LOCATION: 219 Sunset Boulevard North SITE AREA: 20,063 sq.ft. I BUILDING AREA(new expansion gross): 14,458 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting SEPA environmental review and administrative site plan approval for a proposed 34 unit motel. The existing buildings on the half acre site will be removed and replaced with one, three-story building. The height of the building is 35 feet with a ground floor square footage of 4,866. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation LancUShoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas whe ad ona eeded to properly assess this proposal. TTV-} It/3CV9 Signature of rector or Auth r¢ed Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 ti City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: payic.% COMMENTS DUE: DECEMBER 09, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-169,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: NOVEMBER 25, 1998 APPLICANT: Ming Tseng PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nishihira PROJECT TITLE: Renton Inn WORK ORDER NO: 78459 LOCATION: 219 Sunset Boulevard North SITE AREA: 20,063 sq.ft. BUILDING AREA(pew expansion gross): 14,458 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting SEPA environmental review and administrative site plan approval for a proposed 34 unit motel. The existing buildings on the half acre site will be removed and replaced with one, three-story building. The height of the building is 35 feet with a ground floor square footage of 4,866. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS 16 /0/7/4-- C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS , We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is nee d to properly assess this proposal. I .C f, Date / 02-H Signature oferector or At1th razed Representative DEVAPP.00c Rev 10/93 Proposed Mitigation Measures: yPN�Q�IThe following Mitigation Measures will likely be imposed on the proposed project.These recommended Mitigation Measures address project impacts not covered by existing codes and regulations as cited above. NOTICE OF APPLICATION 1. Fire Mitigation Fee-50.52 per square foot of new construction. AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON- 2. Traffic Mitigation Fee-$75 per each new average daily trip attributable to the project booed on the ITE manual. SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Ms.Lesley Nishihira,Project Manager,Development "-- »"�'Y• - Servicas'Division,1055 South`Grid Wa 'Renton,WA 98055,-b 5:00 PM on DeeemBer 9,'1998. if you have DATE November 25,1998 Y Y, Y ' `' questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail,contact LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-98-169,SA-A,ECF Lesley Nishihira at(425)430-7270.Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. APPLICATION NAME: RENTON INN • • CONTACT PERSON,' LESLEY NISHIHIRA(425)430-7270 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting SEPA environmental review and administrative site • plan approval for a proposed 14 unit motel. The existing buildings on the half acre site will be removed and replaced with one,three-story building.The height of the building is 35 feet with a ground floor square footage of 4,866. PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION PROJECT LOCATION: 219 Sunset Boulevard North OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED(DNS-MI:As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore,as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional ONS(M)process to give - ' notice that a DNS-M is likely to be issued.Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period.There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated(DNS-M).A 14 day appeal period will follow the Issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: November 19,1998 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: November 25,1998 IpI��(f� �j Permits/Review Requested: SEPA,Site Plan,Building ��I a�`-_ CT, r�`- '� 11 ,iu Other Pumas which maybe required: None known E (��qj A. • Requested Studies:`. - Drainage Report - tit + F ,�11. _ �Y R y0 V Location where application may `G � S 1��•��r//• tt,� be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, �. 1 4� �� - 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 I p 11fI�p�i-�- PUBLIC HEARING: Not required. !it ILO I`� t5� �S1�''-11 , . CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: l `-, / ' / Analytical process r ,c._- r Project consistency refers to whether a project is consistent with adopted and applicable development regulations,or In �L Ilirl /1�'a , their absence,comprehensive plan policies.RCW 36.709.110(2)(g)provides that the Notice of Application(NOA) Yt" p@ y'-_-1'I)- ` . - '' include a statement of the preliminary determination of a project's consistency with the type of land use,level of l��L1 ' g:- --;%, \-\\ 3 development,Infrastructure,and character of development if one has been made at the time of notice.At a minimum, 7(11 tit=-'�_ every NOA shall include a determination of the project's consistency with the zoning,comprehensive plan and L�.7 ;' ILt. \,tI a- development regulations. rr - - Land Use: The proposal is consistent with the Commercial Arterial(CA)zoning designation R I IiL? � \ as well as the Comprehensive Plan Map designation of Employment Area- - Commercial. Environmental Documents that •r RENTON INN Evaluate the Proposed Project: None VICI ITN MAP Development Regulations .o� Used For Project Mitigation: The proposal is subject to the City's SEPA Ordinance,Zoning Code, Public Works Standard's,UBC,and UFC. GENMALOT.DOC GENMALOT.DOC CERTIFICATION • z, 5 N iry 'flt , hereby certify that copies of the above document were posted by me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on \t<t1 t' e,tiu\l i 0.0v tniriov(9), II gf. • Signed: if 4 /1P -)3 ATTEST: Subcribed and sworn before me, a Nortary Public,in and fore State of Washington residing in ' , on the -ice day of ;r�x�-� . (�1 5 • • L"--//Y/ it.}-(A-/- 7lett2z)14---/.. Al . MARILYN KAMCHEFF COMMISSION EXPIRES 6/29/99 rs 7 � .r r•t— f Jl r_. e l :':3*"1" !'1114A : s" • , yG ft ate * f ��•s^ abr+c `}' rC .,4 .2ra r' •NTO • NOTICE OF APPLICATION ?On a ,„ um . i` AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON-! , 'ifm.o .: .- . :4 " 4N SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED "„ !In 1.. r'` ` DATE: November 25,1998 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-98-169,SA-A,ECF r d;f, • APPLICATION NAME: RENTON INN PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting SEPA environmental review and administrative site plan approval for a proposed 34 unit motel. The existing buildings on the half acre site will be removed and replaced with one,three-story building. The height of the building is 35 feet.with a ground floor square footage of 4,866. PROJECT LOCATION: 219 Sunset Boulevard North OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED(DNS-M): As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore,as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS(M)process to give notice that a DNS-M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated(DNS-M). A 14 day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: November 19, 1998 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: November 25, 1998 Permits/Review Requested: SEPA,Site Plan,Building Other Permits which may be required: None known Requested Studies: Drainage Report Location where application may be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 PUBLIC HEARING: Not required. CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Analytical process Project consistency refers to whether a project is consistent with adopted and applicable development regulations,or in their absence,comprehensive plan policies. RCW 36.706.110(2)(g)provides that the Notice of Application(NOA) include a statement of the preliminary determination of a project's consistency with the type of land use,level of development,infrastructure,and character of development if one has been made at the time of notice. At a minimum, every NOA shall include a determination of the project's consistency with the zoning,comprehensive plan and development regulations. Land Use: The proposal is consistent with the.Commercial Arterial(CA)zoning designation as well as the Comprehensive Plan Map designation of Employment Area- Commercial. Environmental Documents that 4fti Evaluate the Proposed Project: None Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: The proposal is subjectto the City's SEPA Ordinance,Zoning Code, Public Works Standard's,UBC,and UFC. GENMALOT.DOC Proposed Mitigation Measures: At>444:;,1 The following Mitigation Measures will likely be imposed on the proposed project. These recommended Mitigation Measures address project impacts not covered by existing codes and regulations as cited above. ,.,R..,Y,,,.... ., , 1. Fire Mitigation Fee-$0.52 per square foot of new construction. 7, t 111-1. ' • ' '/,'l c *af# ::_'- i r its " 1' 2. Traffic Mitigation Fee-$75 per each new average daily trip attributable to the, ,,„a.. x ,,,,,,a •uyt.t. ,40,,t; ,,x; P ,,7 � r x,;;. !.,: project based on the ITE manual. '.' `: . ,tA.-Tr4;sn-l�4 _ .— ta 5. • .' Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Ms.Lesley Nishihira,Project Manager, Development Services Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055, by 5:00 PM on December 9, 1998. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact Lesley Nishihira at(425)430-7270. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: LESLEY NISHIHIRA (425)430-7270 PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION jill:VI MEMO fi ---I V . .'4— tI---ic -----k:I Llikilm_it4V ..... , .--- . 04 :-_-ppAig....e, v..kle(' . ,,,,,, rov_.# !mil . ' 6/416%,�/ PROJECT LOCATION �/ HmiltilirL4'-'7 1.,...7.___1715 , \,_11 1 - 1 LEE & ASSOCIATES RENTON" INN- VICINITY MAP GENMALOT.DOC :•i::J:i:i•%!.:}..i:{}ii::: ..i:.::.::.:•i:iiii}, {:.:i:!.:!:::: is?ibi}:}i:iiii. :.::.::::::. ...... ...... ...:.........:....... ................. , . LO ME .T.SER...LCES... L. LAST OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS PROJECT NAME: rt.441ZA (h APPLICATION NO: LUR• 9$. 11091 SIA- Ft,LC-1" The following is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. The Development Services Division will notify these individuals of the proposed development. NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER Edwars, Dwight W&Carol J 17454 SE 192nd Dr. 1352300980 Renton, WA 98058 Harvego,Carol Elizabeth 1521 N 3rd St. 1352300990 Renton, WA 98055 Butenko,Christopher R+Bonit 1525 N 3rd St. 1352300995 Renton, WA 98055 Sharma,Vishnu Deo 16442- 111th Ave. SE 1352301000 Renton, WA 98055 Arnolctwerru,s ''. 208 Factory Ave.N. 1352301010 Renton, WA 98055 • Green,Kayt he 3 fe 204 Factory Ave.N. 1352301015 '4,4 " : Renton, WA 98055 Kraght,BeljamiriJ..t 22725-91st Way S. 1352301020 Kent, WA 98031 Wood,Arthur 1510 N Brooks St 1352301025 Renton, WA 98055 Wautlet,Raymond 1520 N Brook St. 1352301035 Renton, WA 98055 'LOPMENT PL.'.. Luong,Ha 1522 N Brook St. 1352301040 CITY OF F.E.i. Renton, WA 98055 l n,l ���5 Dunn Lumber Northwest RT P.O.Box 45550 1352300875 t, Seattle, WA 98145 1` ,c Burlington Northrn Santa Fe 1700 E Golf Rd#400 1723059006, 172305917 ECE V E TAX Department Schaumburg, II 60173 1723059006 Bitney,Dean W 2727 Mt.View Ave.N 1723059174 Renton, WA 98056 Golden Palace 151 Sunset Blvd.N 1723059074 Renton, WA 98055 Colonel,Richard C P.O.Box 2192 1723059273 Renton, WA 98056 Ciambrone,Robert J. +Tiffany 11517 NE 107th P1. 1723059089 Kirkland, WA 98033 Windsor Park Estates 11100 NE 8th St.#800 1723059090, 1723059091 Charles Kaplan Bellevue, WA 98004 City of Renton 1055 S Grady Way 1723059005 Renton, WA 98055 (Attach additional sheets, if necessary) (Continued) NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER • Applicant Certification I, l; , hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property (Print Name) owners and their addresses were obtained from: ,..City of Renton Technical Services Records , ... 4 71,,, C7 Title Company Records ; .E( ing County Assessors Records ��,,' Signed �� i� z� Date /J� /7 .40;- ,' (App icant) old s Nbt`�`�� a' , „3I NOTARY ATTESTED: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington, residing at vi<,Q r1Zg. on the (1 day of NOV eIA/)3E2` , 19 GO. Signed ,(/hd(,at. C - _ (Notary Public) 1 For City of>Renton' Use*'. .;;:;«::>:�:: ::•::::::>;::....................... . ............. .: CERTI ....:. .:. je"IZ y. fythat nottce5<of t he proposed>applreatlon were malled;;to:: ><<» e a h:ais C ed: ` _o ert .:owner'. ...>:>: ::< .:. ........ S >NOTAR .><::.::::::::::;;:.:< :::•::::::: A TTE ST S'bscrtb`ed and'isworr. before me :;a' Nota P ` ublic, 1�,-�t�d�foc;the State of VVashington residing at� ,,( ry +� , on he z day of 19 ,,. '.;;:..;: Sidii6d1',.'0:::Q::::,2.7....T4.Q.i.ii::04iim:::::',74.9:ii::: :,; '.' 1".....:::.'',:.:.....:i'i'::::::::::::::::::-::::i::: ::'ff:i::::.:.::.:::::.:::'i*if:*:'.:mi*.i'::......::.::'*:.:.::.:::::::::::.''''.:"'""""''''.."..."''''''''"'.::".'":'...:::::::::.'"":'::.*::::::.:':':::::::::' listprop.doc v 'f REV07/95 MARILYN KAMCHEFF COMMISSION EXPIRES C/29/99 2 4, CITX OF RENTON %NIL Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator November 25, 1998 Mr.Jae Lee Lee Associates 1822 Field Place NE Renton, WA 98059 SUBJECT: Renton Inn Project No. LUA-98-169,SA-A,ECF Dear Mr. Tseng: The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on December 15, 1998. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. Please contact me, at (425) 430-7270, if you have any questions. Sincerely, itU) ivrP75)-- Lesley Nishihira Project Manager cc: Mr. Ming Tseng/Owner ACCPTLTR.DOC 1055 South Grady Way - Renton,Washington 98055 CITY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION LAND USE PERMIT` MASTER APPLICATION PROPERTY OWNERS) PROJECT i.;.;:..:: N:.: FORMATION Note: If there is more than one legal owner, please attach an additional notarized Master Application for each owner. PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: NAME: Mi19 L. ise, n4-en1 1nri q PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION: ADDRESS: Za S�1Se4 9g��• Al • 2(°i Siti✓rse� (3(vd. keit/apt , Peftleni , tact- '1 has CITY: ! ZIP: 16 KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): et f?DTI l 72-30S 9 v7`7 l72 30S-9 0e.2_ TELEPHONE NUMBER: EXISTING LAND USE(S): ¢�ZS�271 - ► IS1 APFLICANT;tif rather than Owner) C67nr7140rCIOL./ PROPOSED LAND USES: NAME: iks At liVes- COMPANY(if applicable): EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: ADDRESS: PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): f-pf&y'manJ- Arm — &&&mere CITY: ZIP: EXISTING ZONING: i'ecga 4r1 r J C CA ) TELEPHONE NUMBER: ( r PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): CONTACT PERSON V / SITE AREA (SQ. FT. OR ACREAGE): L t-t-OPMENT P1 NAME: itt af- Lc( CITY OF REi+V'I ',. 20,ol,3 s:F. Nov 19 1998 COMPANY (if,BppRC� )" ��o�a�es PROJECT VALUE: RECEIVED j C ' Zvi ADDRESS: I vGL Field pi NE IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? .7(-fig I CITY: ZIP: RSpc 1(( 7'1 1 I IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA? TELEPHONE NUMBER: r L (leG)- 941 2-- 2-'7 3 c7 • PION OF PROP•E•RT•Y (Attach s _te sheet if necessar ) - • • • • APPLICATION & F� $ Check all application types that apply--City staff will determine fees _ ANNEXATION $ SUBDIVISION: _ COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT $ REZONE $ _ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ SPECIAL PERMIT $ _ SHORT PLAT $ _ TEMPORARY PERMIT $ _TENTATIVE PLAT $ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ _ PRELIMINARY PLAT $ SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ �,C'c�' _ FINAL PLAT $ — GRADE & FILL PERMIT $ (NO. CU. YDS: ) PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ VARIANCE _ $ (FROM SECTION: ) _ PRELIMINARY _ WAIVER $ _ FINAL WETLAND PERMIT $ ROUTINE VEGETATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ _ BINDING SITE PLAN $ SHORELINE REVIEWS: SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ _ CONDITIONAL USE $ VARIANCE $ / _ EXEMPTION $No Charge ✓ ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ 5 " REVISION $ AFFIDAVIT OF OWNR� HIP • I, (Print Name) ;soilL. r�ljyrP�, declare that I am (please check one) L the owner of the property involved in this application,_the authorized representativ to act or th_ roperty owner (please attach proof of authorization), and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. ATTEST: Subscribed and worn to before rT`e,, a t�lAtary Public, in and ql))1,1 . r the State of V� ridinga �(Name of Ownerepresentative)'') • , on the 1,b.da4 bf is Q rl k Yr n l 1 n 1/, j 47 a • i. (Signature of Owner/Representative) (Signature of Notary Public) 's 00f +„�� �r Vµ(3\ (This section to be completed by City Staff.) City File Number: 1/1/.01V "�(' ,�A AAD BSP CAP-S CAP-U CPA CU-A CU-H LLA MHP FPUD FP PP R RVMP SA-A) SA-H SHPL-A SHPL-H SP SM SME TP V-A V-B V-H W TOTAL FEES: $ 5G1-61. TOTAL POSTAGE PROVIDED: $ MASTERAP.DOC REVISED 8/97 (14_ 05 ../ CO..) / 7 /�l?et" _71, -e,„„t-- 632, of STATE OF WASHINGTON, ss. (Individual Acknowledgment) COUNTY OF L - Ca On this t 5T61 day of Nm1e•+N+ecat , ice, before me personally appeared �b M // A. CA.,GA 1..>J , to me known to be the individual—described in and who exequted the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledtged that the_signed the same as V z47 free and voluntary act and deed, for the\uses and purposes therein mentioned. I*I WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hair'f d affixed my Official Seal the day and year first above written. �/` Nota �P ♦' i • .nd for the State of Washington, residing at 'r I tbs.etief *14141.00 egttlf • • , 4^. •.7 • • • • • • • • • •. • .• • • . • 0S1*.emo LEGAL DESCRIPTION for Renton Inn 219 Sunset Blvd.N Renton, WA 98055 • 1723059077 BEG AT C/L OF PC R/W AT PT WH BEARS N 81-02-40 E 85.18 FT FR INTER BRONSON WAY N & RR AVE RENTON TH N 49-50-40 E 372.81 FT TO WLY MGN STATE HWY #2 TH ALG SD HWY NLY 100 FT TH TRUE BEG TH NLY 100 FT TH N 67-18-00 W 133.75 FT TH SWLY PLL TO C/L RY R/W& 36 FT THEREFROM 100 FT TH S 67-18-00 E TO TRUE BEG 1723059082 BEG AT C/L OF PC R/W AT PT WH BEARS N 81-02-40 E 85.18 FT FR INTER BRONSON WAY N & RR AVE RENTON TH N 49-50-40 E 372.81 FT TO WLY MGN STATE HWY#2 TH N 22-42- 00 E ALG SD WLY MGN 200 FT TO TRUE BEG TH CONTG 50 FT TH N 67-18-00 W 133.75 FT M/L TO PT 36 FT E OF & MEAS AT R/A TO C/L OF SD RY R/W TH SWLY PLL TO SD R/W 50 FT TH S 67-18-00 E 133.75 FT M/L TO TRUE BEG 4 ', 9 . `L a yVV LD-REN.DOC\ 9. PROJECT NARRATIVE • Project name, size and location of site Renton Inn. The proposed project site is a 0.5 acre area located in Section 17, Township 23 North, Range 5 East in Renton, Washington. The site address is 219 Sunset Blvd. N., Renton, Washington 98055. • Zoning designation of the site and adjacent properties Commercial Arterial and adjacent properties are also Commercial Arterial zone • Current use of the site and any existing improvements Property is being used for a motel, a teriyaki restaurant and a vacant retail space. • Special site features (i.e. wetlands, water bodies, steep slopes) None • Statement addressing soil type and drainage conditions Urban • Proposed use of the property and scope of the proposed development (i.e. height, square footage, lot coverage, parking, access, etc.) Proposed project involves a complete removal of existing buildings and a new construction of a 3 story (40.5' max) motel building to include approximately 33 motel units, an office, a manager's unit, and a laundry room on an existing commercial property located at 219 Sunset Blvd N, in Renton, Washington. Proposed site will have total 35 parking stalls. Total footprint area is 4,866.4 sf and total floor area is 14,458.4 sf. • Proposed off-site improvements(i.e. installation of sidewalks, fire hydrants, sewer main, etc.) Removal of existing driveway and replace with sidewalks. Replacement of fittings on existing fire hydrants located one in the front of site and another one in 120 ft. north of north property line. Replace existing 6" side-sewer line with new 8" line. New water meter will be install and 8" storm line will be connected to catch basin. • Total estimated construction cost and estimated fair market value of the proposed project Total estimated construction cost is $1,000,000 and estimated fair market value is $1,600,000. • Estimated quantities and type of materials involved if any fill or excavation is proposed Import of fill will be some topsoil for landscaping and crushed rock for base. • Number, type and size of trees to be removed None • Explanation of any land to be dedicated to the City None OPP;,<=NT FL'„ CITY OF R .i- NOV 1 U 1998 RECEIVED 10. CONSTRUCTION MITIGATION DESCRIPTION • Proposed construction dates (begin and end dates) Jan. 99 thru June 99 • Hours of operation 7 am to 5 pm • Proposed hauling/transportation routes To be determent later per City of Renton standards routes • Measures to be implemented to minimize dust, traffic and transportation impacts, erosion, mud, noise, and other noxious characteristics. Any short term impacts during construction (if any) will be minimized by using standard erosion control methods. Dust from construction activities would be mitigated by using dust control methods such as spraying the site with water and using a street sweeper (if needed). No impacts on traffic except during the off-site improvement construction, proper traffic control will be present to City for approval. • Any specialty hours proposed for construction or hauling (i.e. weekends, late nights) N/A • Preliminary traffic control plan Standard City of Renton traffic control plans are included in construction spec. \ r. •:NT CiIYUFf .i.1 pin'/ 9 1998 RECEIVED 13. PARKING, LOT COVERAGE, LANDSCAPING ANALYSIS • Total square footage of the site: 20,031 SF • Total square footage of existing area(s) of impervious surfacing: 18,016 SF • Total square footage of existing natural/undeveloped area: 2,015 SF • Square footage (by floor and overall total) of each individual building and/or use, Ground (footprint): 4,866.4 SF Second: 4,796.0 SF Third: 4,796.0 SF TOTAL: 14,458.4 SF • Total square footage of the footprints of all buildings: 4,866.4 SF • Percentage of lot covered by buildings or structures: 24.3 % • Total pavement square footage both existing pavement to remain plus new pavement proposed to be installed: None will be remain and New pavement square footage is 12,722.6 SF • Square footage of any on-site wetlands: None • Parking analysis to included the total number of parking spaces required and provided, number of compact and "ADA accessible" spaces provided, and parking space dimensions, For 33 unit motel: Required: 33 + 1 for employee = 34 Provided: Standard 22 ADA spaces 2 Compact 11 Total 35 • Square footage of landscaping for each area, for interior parking lot landscaping, and total Interior parking lot landscaping: 1,128 SF Total: 2,441.8 SF • Allowable and proposed building height Allowable: 50 ft max. Proposed: 40.5 ft • Building setbacks required by Code, and Front: 10 ft min. (0') Rear/Side: None • Proposed building setbacks, Front(East): 80 ft Rear(West): 5 ft Side: North -50 ft South -5 ft DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS LAND USE PERMIT SUBMITTAL WAIVED MODIFIED COMMENTS: REQUIREMENTS:; BY. BY. Calculations, Survey, Drainage Control Plan 2 Drainage Report 2 Elevations, ArchitecturalsAr,oa Elevations, Grading 2 Existing Covenants (Recorded Copy)4 Existing Easements (Recorded Copy)4 Flood Plain Map, if applicable 4 iti Floor Plans 3 AND 4 Geotechnical Report p. 2AND3 Grading Plan, Conceptual 2 Grading Plan, Detailed 2 King County Assessor's Map Indicating Site 4 Landscaping Plan, Conceptual,' Legal Description 4 List of Surrounding Property Owners 4 Mailing Labels for Property Owners 4 Map of Existing Site Conditions 4 Master Application Form 4 Monument Cards (one per monument), Parking, Lot Coverage & Landscaping Analysis 4 Plan Reductions (PMTs)a Postage 4 Public Works Approval Letter 2 Title Report or Plat Certificate 4 Topography Map (5' contours)3 Traffic Study 2 �? Tree CuttingNegetation Clearing Plan 4 G Utilities Plan, Generalized 2 N yJ f,,TA Wetlands Delineation Map4 G7 Wetlands Planting Plan 4N Wetlands Study 4 Y/,N This requirement may be waived by: / 1. Property Services Section PROJECT NAME: fZ&2 /17/') 2 Public Works Plan Review Section 3. Building Section DATE: //— /, C_ 7 4. Development Planning Section h:\division s\develoo.ser\dev.olan.ina\waiver.xls CITY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. ,_LOPrfEt4T PL''.'\; 1,` CtTY OF tam, 1 1838 RECEIVED • A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Renton Inn 2. Name of applicant: Ming L. Tseng 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Applicant: Contact Person: Ming L.Tseng Jae Lee 219 Sunset Blvd N. 1822 Field PI NE Renton,WA 98055 Renton,WA 98059 (425) 271-1159 (206) 992-2730 4. Date checklist prepared: October 20, 1998 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton, Development Services Division 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Construction in January 1999 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Level 1 Drainage Analysis 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Land Use Permit, Site Plan Review, Building Permit, Construction Permit. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. Proposed project involves a complete removal of existing buildings and a new construction of a motel building to include approximately 33 motel units, an office, a manager's unit, and a laundry room on an existing commercial property located at 219 Sunset Blvd N, in Renton, Washington. Currently, the property is being used for a motel, a teriyaki restaurant and a vacant retail space. Total footprint area is 4,866.4 sf and total floor area is 14,458.4 sf 7 • 12. Location of the propo Give sufficient information for a pers- `o understand the precise location of your propo project, including a street address, if ar Ind section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The proposed project site is a 0.5 acre area located in Section 17, Township 23 North, Range 5 East in Renton, Washington. 219 Sunset Blvd. N., Renton, Washington 98055. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); fla , rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) 1% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. urban (surface are 100% improved) d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Construction of motel, landscaping area, parking area and driveway may require some filling and grading, all material and method per City of Renton Standard. Import of fill will be some topsoil for landscaping and crushed rock for base. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. No. Any short term impacts during construction (if any) will be minimized by using standard erosion control methods. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 87% h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: No. Any short term impacts during construction (if any) will be minimized by using standard erosion control methods 3 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. There will be minor air quality impacts during construction of motel building or off- site improvement (if any). b. Are there any off-site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Dust from construction activities would be mitigated by using dust control methods such as spraying the site with water and using a street sweeper (if needed). 3. WATER a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. N/A 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No 4 b. Ground Water 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. N/A c. Water Runoff(including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters, If so, describe. There are no off-site drainage basins affecting this proposal. All storm run off is generated on site. Refer to attached drainage report. 2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: N/A 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? About 45 ft row of photinia and some annual flower bed c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: N/A 5 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: (see next page) (Bird hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other Coho salmon, Sockeye salmon, Chinook salmon, Steelhead trout, and Cutthroat trout. b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. N/A c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain N/A d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: N/A 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar)will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electric will be used for heating and A/C for each motel unit and lobby and natural gas for hot water tank. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. N/A c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Natural gas for hot water tank. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. N/A 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: N/A 6 b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Traffic and train 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short-term - During the construction within the City of Renton noise control hours Long-term - Minimal amount of traffic 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Construction will have restrictive hours per City of Renton Code 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Commercial b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No c. Describe any structures on the site. Property is being used for a motel, a teriyaki restaurant and a vacant retail space. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Yes, All the existing structures. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Commercial Arterial (CA) f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Employment Area -Commercial g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 2 to 4 7 j. Approximately ' many people would the completed proje ` -"splace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N/A Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: No change in land uses 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N/A 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. 40 ft, The principal exterior wall material will be stucco. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? From all directions c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Replace of un-present old building with new building 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Light from each motel units and parking lot light standards, at dusk. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No 8 c. What existing c"" .:e sources of light or glare may affect yoi__ --oposal? N/A d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Each unit will have windows cover and all the exterior light will be control to light the site only. 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? None b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: N/A 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. N/A c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: N/A 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Direct access to Sunset Blvd. N. and 1/2 block to 1-405 ramps. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? New-35 Existing -12 9 d. Will the propos quire any new roads or streets, or imp! -nents to existing roads or streets, not inc ig driveways? If so, generally descrit ndicate whether public or private? No e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No, Railroad on rear side of the site. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. 33X9.11 = 300 veh/day AM 33X.67 = 22 PM 33X.69 = 23 per ITE trip generation manual g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: N/A 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No Change from current use b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Building will be have sprinkler system. 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: 4SW 0atural ga ay refuse service, tteTepho , 4gialigio septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Connection of electric, natural gas, water, storm sewer, sanitary sewer and telephone services. C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: Name Printed: J,4,E Date: /f 0)- ls 10 ' D. SUPPLEMENTAL ; EETS FOR NONPROJECT ACTT( MS (These sheets should only be used for actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs. You do not need to fill out these sheets for project actions.) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? 11 Proposed mea to reduce or respond to such demand re: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: Name Printed: Date: 12 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 98_S4- 1 • CITY OF RENTON JUL 0 9 1998 RECEIVED MEMORANDUM DATE: al/�'� ' f* GI GI e? TO: Construction Services, Fire Prevention, Plan Review, Project Planner FROM: Jim Hanson, Development Services Division Director SUBJECT: New Preliminary Application: RENTON I N N LOCATION: 0-1 f SU NiS -T Sr1,1,JD N A meeting with the Applicant has been scheduled for //'•O0 , Thursday, r for one of the 6th floor conference rooms (new city hall). If this meeting is scheduled at 10:00 AM, the MEETING MUST BE CONCLUDED PRIOR TO 11:00 AM to allow time to prepare for the 11 :00 meeting. Please review the attached project plans prior to the scheduled meeting with the applicant. You will not need to do a thorough "permit level" review at this time. Note only major issues that must be resolved prior to formal land use and/or building permit application submittal. If you are unable to attend the meeting, please send a representative. Please submit your written comments to �, ��= at least two (2) days before the meeting. Thank you. • ►._ /F RECEIVEL J ti`CY O • �' CITY OF RENTON , �o� FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU MEMORANDUM DATE: July 13, 1998 TO: Leslie Nishihara, Planner e l►� FROM: Jim Gray, Assistant Fire Marshal VA SUBJECT: Renton Inn Project, 219 Sunset Blv . N Fire Department Comments: 1. The preliminary Fire flow is based on the total square footage of the the building. I will need this information to calculate the preliminary fire flow. One fire hydrant is required within 150 feet of the building and additional hydrants within 300 feet of the building. The total number of hydrants is based on the fire flow. 2. A fire mitigation fee is required based on $.52 a square foot of the building square footage. 4. Separate plans and permits are required for the fire alarm and sprinkler systems installation. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: July 17, 1988 TO: Lesley Nishihira 14-,Zez. FROM: Paul Lumbert SUBJECT: Renton Inn Preliminary Application Note on Preliminary Review Comments Contained In This Report: The following comments on development and permitting issues are based upon the pre- application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision makers (e.g., Hearing Examiner, Board of Adjustment, Board of Public Works and City Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on programmatic, site planning and other design changes made by the applicant. Sanitary Sewer: The site is served by an existing 15" sewer main located in Alley right-of-way at the west side of the site. The proposed building would require a side sewer connection with cost at $80/connection. The project will require a grease trap/grease interceptor if any food preparation will occur on site and the device must meet current UPC Standards. Sanitary sewer (SDC) fees of $0.078/sq. ft. of gross site area will be required. Water: The site is served by an existing 6" main located on the west side of Sunset Blvd. N. Additional water main/fire hydrants/DDCV Assembly will be required to meet Fire Code/Fire flow requirements as determined by the Renton Fire Department. Back flow prevention device will be required for domestic water service (3 floors high). Water July 17, 1998 Page 2 meters for domestic service, irrigation and fire protection will be required. The site is located in the 196 pressure Zone and has a static pressure in the main at 66 PSI (196- 43 site elevation = 153 x .43 = 65.79). The site is located in aquifer protection Zone I. Water (SDC) fees of $0.113/sq. ft. of gross site area will be required. Storm Drainage: The drainage system and temporary erosion control plans shall be designed in accordance with the 1990 KCSWDM as adopted by the City of Renton. Biofiltration will be required if more than 5,000 sq. ft. of new impervious surface subject to vehicular use is proposed to be constructed on site. The project will require a Level I drainage analysis to show impacts to the down stream system. Surface water (SDC) fees of $0.129/sq. ft. of new impervious surface installed on-site by the project Street Improvements: The site has existing curb, gutter, street paving, sidewalk and street lighting in place on Sunset Blvd. N. New concrete driveways will be required to meet current City Codes/Standards. A traffic mitigation fee of $75/trip will be required (current edition of the ITE trip generation manual will be used as a guide). General: Construction permit fees will be required for construction of water mains, side sewer, storm drainage system and street improvements.. The cost of permits are as follows: The first $100,000 is at 5% of the cost of the construction, the second from $100,000 to $200,000 is at 4% of the cost and the third all the amount over $200,000 is at 3% of the cost. Half of the fee must be paid upon application for building and off/on site utility and street improvement construction review. The remainder shall be paid when the permits are issued. h:pinrvu/In/rentinn CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works MEMORANDUM DATE: July 23, 1998 TO: Pre-Application File FROM: Lesley Nishihira, Assistant Planner, x7270 SUBJECT: Renton Inn, Pre-Application File No. 98-54 We have completed a preliminary review of the pre-application for the proposed development. The following comments on development and permitting issues are based on the pre-application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision makers (e.g., Hearing Examiner, Zoning Administrator, Board of Adjustment, Board of Public Works, and City Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by City staff or made by the applicant. The applicant is encouraged to review all applicable sections of the Renton Municipal Code. General The project site is located in the Commercial Arterial (CA) zone--see attached zoning map and CA handout. The proposed use, a 30 to 40 unit motel, is a primary permitted use in the CA zone. The Comprehensive Plan designation for the site is Employment Area - Commercial which supports this proposal. Comments 1. The minimum front yard/street setback of 10 feet is required to be landscaped unless reduced through the Site Plan Review process. The applicant will be required to submit a landscape plan showing species types and sizes of proposed landscaping at the time of formal application. 2. A pedestrian connection from the street to the building will be required per RMC section 4-31- 10.4D6b. 3. The required parking for a motel is one space per room, plus one space for every three employees. The site plan provided, which shows 34 spaces (there is no space for#20), meets the parking requirement for guest rooms, but does not allow for any employee parking. The site plan will need to be revised to accomodate parking for employees as well as two ADA accessible stalls. (The site plan is not clear as to whether spaces#1 and#2 are the required accessible stalls.) 4. The compact parking on the site (#23 through #35) exceeds the number allowed per code (see RMC section 4-14-6A4b2). Compact spaces are limited to 30% of the required parking-- approximately 11 spaces for this proposal. PRE9854.DOC\ 5. Please note the necessary revisions to accomodate the pedestrian connection, the additional emp:oyee parking and the elimination of compact stalls may require further modifications to the site plan (e.g., the current plan shows a parking aisle which meets the required width of 24 feet, however, revising the compact parking may require modifications to the building size in order to maintain the minimum aisle width). 6. There appears to be two separate parcels on the site. The applicant may want to complete a lot line adjustment to remove the dividing property line or record a restrictive covenant prohibiting the sale or development of the adjacent lot proposed for parking. With this property line intact, additional building setbacks and firewalls will be required. Permits Required The proposed development would require SEPA Environmental Review as well as Administrative Site Plan Approval. Both would be processed concurrently and would take approximately 6 to 8 weeks process time. Please refer to the application packet attached for submittal requirements and fees. PRE9854.DOC\ MEMORANDUM I JUL 1 0 998 ECO^lO.Mt �EbE OFt , J OCT,,;_ G, 1 DATE: q I g 1g TO: Long Range Planning FROM: Jim Hanson, Development Services Division Director • SUBJECT: New Preliminary Application: 12e/i L1Y1 Inn LOCATION: �I g Sik) U i' cI F4 Please review the attached preliminary project plans for consistency with applicable Comprehensive Plan Policies. Please submit your written comments to � no later than �V�y . Thank you. We will not be able to include comments received after this date in the presentation/summary we prepare for the applicant. C — �{1ec L / 2'72 o h C /C/ w1/% 2'4762/461. .04/7 - Ecort Sic:ry 1-,f7) 43-r•AS'Lc Yr7e'r!7 /1-5-L6.-)-N - Ci r 1n., .(tc,/� po, Zon;cr, C.� No 6'01.-t s5ue3 . STORM DRAINAGE REPORT FOR THE RENTON INN 219 SUNSET BLVD.N. Renton, WA 98055 November 10, 1998 _ of WAsk. adt ,v•A!' • IONAL I EXPIRES 2/12//P O ''T F1 . Li►Y t%iip191� 3 Cover.doc\ PROJECT OVERVIEW This project is the Renton Inn, a 34 room motel located at 219 Sunset Blvd N. Work will include the demolition of the existing Yoko teriyaki restaurant, the existing motel and the Rubber Duck CB building. The new construction will include a 4,866 s.f. motel, 35 stall parking lot and landscaping. The project site is on King County Tax Parcels 1723059077 and 1723059082. II. EXISTING CONDITIONS Soils on the site are identified by the SCS Survey for King County as. The SCS Description is as follows: Urban land is soil that has been modified by disturbance of the natural layers with additions of fill material several feet thick to accommodate large industrial and housing installations. The site will therefore contain hydrologic soil group C. EXISTING DEVELOPMENT AND DRAINAGE The site is currently comprised of a single family residence, a teriyaki restaurant, the former Rubber Duck CB Radio building, 3 small buildings used as motel rooms and a storage building located on a 20,031 s.f. lot. The existing drainage flows into onsite catch basins which drain to the City's storm drainage system in Sunset Blvd. N. OFFSITE AND DOWNSTREAM DRAINAGE There is no offsite drainage which discharges onto the site. The neighboring properties are fully developed with their own onsite drainage systems. See Core Requirement No. 2 for a description of the downstream drainage. III. DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS SUMMARY ON-SITE DEVELOPMENT AND DRAINAGE The new motel, parking lot and onsite walkways will occupy approximately 17,589 s.f. of the parcel's 20,031 s.f. The remaining area will be used for landscape purposes. Drainage for the new parking lot will be accomplished by the installation of two new type-IP catch basins which will be connected to the City's system in Sunset Blvd. N. OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS AND DRAINAGE No offsite improvements are proposed. 1 IV. DISCUSSION OF CORE REQUIREMENTS Core Requirement No. 1 - Discharge at the Natural Location The existing site is fully developed and has an existing storm system which discharges to the City's system in Sunset Blvd. N. The New development will remove the existing on-site system, replace it with a new one and discharge to the same City catch basin as the current system. Core Requirement No. 2 - Off-Site Analysis This downstream analysis was performed on November 10, 1998. The project sites new drainage system will drain into an existing City catch basin at the northeast corner of the site located at 219 Sunset Blvd. N. Runoff then flows south approximately 250 feet north via a 12" concrete storm drain located on the west side of Sunset Blvd N. Flows then continue west approximately 250 feet via a 24" concrete storm drain to Houser Way N. The drainage then travels north under Houser Way approximately 900 feet via a 24" concrete storm drain to the intersection of Houser Way N and N. 4th Street. The drainage continues north through the PACCAR site and eventually discharges to Lake Washington. The downstream conveyance system appeared to be in good shape and showed no evidence of drainage related problems (flooding, erosion, etc.). The system appears to have adequate capacity to handle the existing surface water runoff. Core Requirement No. 3 - Runoff Control The project is exempt from providing On-site Peak Rate Runoff Control per "Exemptions From On-Site Peak Rate Runoff Control", requirement No. 1-Negligible Peak Runoff Rate Increase. The existing site has an impervious area of 18,016 s.f. The proposed development will have a total imperious area of 17,589 s.f. The proposed development will contain approximately 427 s.f. less total impervious area. Therefore drainage flows will remain approximately the same if not decrease slightly. Core Requirement No. 4 - Conveyance System The new storm system will convey the 100 year design storm Core Requirement No. 5 - Erosion Sedimentation Control Plan An Erosion and Sedimentation plan shall be shown on the project plans. Core Requirement No. 6 - Maintenance and Operation Maintenance and Operation of the stormwater system for the site will be the responsibility of the Renton Inn ownership. 2 Core Requirement No. 7 - Bonds and Liability Bonds and liability insurance will be provided by the Renton Inn ownership. V. DISCUSSION OF SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS Special Requirement No. 1 - Critical Drainage Areas This site is not located in a critical drainage basin. Special Requirement No. 2 - Compliance with existing Master Drainage Plan There is no existing known Master Drainage Plan that includes this site. Special Requirement No. 3 - Conditions Requiring a Master Drainage Plan This project site does not trigger any of the thresholds that require a Master Drainage Plan. Special Requirement No. 4 - Adopted Basin or Community Plans The site is not in any known adopted basin or community plans. Special Requirement No. 5 - Special Water Quality Controls The existing site has approximately 11,627 s.f. of impervious surface subject to vehicular traffic. The proposed development will have 11,564 s.f. of impervious surface subject to vehicular traffic. Since there will be a decrease of approximately 67 s.f. of driveable area, the development is therefore exempt from special water quality controls. Special Requirement No. 6 - Coalescing Plate Oil/Water Separator The project site does not meet the criteria which require a coalescing plate oil/water separator. Special Requirement No. 7 - Closed Depression There are no closed depressions on the project site. Special Requirement No. 8 - Use of Lakes, Wetlands or Closed Depressions for Peak Runoff Control The project will not use a lake, wetlands or closed depressions for peak runoff control. Special Requirement No. 9 - Delineation of 100 Year Floodplain The project site is not within the 100 year floodplain. Special Requirement No. 10- Flood Protection Facilities for Type 1 and 2 Streams The project site does not abut a Type 1 or 2 stream and we do not propose to construct a new, or modify an existing flood protection facility. The site is therefore exempt from this 3 • requirement. Special Requirement No. 11 - Geotechnical Analysis and Report The proposed project does not meet the criteria that would require a geotechnical analysis as part of the civil plan review. However a geotechnical report is being prepared as a requirement for the City's Building Department and will be submitted at a later date. Special Requirement No. 12 - Soils Analysis and Report A geotechnical analysis and report are not required for this project. Special Requirement No. 13 - Aquifer Recharge and Protection Areas This site is in an Aquifer Protection Area. All construction materials shall comply with the City of Renton's Aquifer Protection Area Ordinance. 4 ICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPA 1800 COLUMBIA CENTER, 701 5TH AVE SEATTLE, WA 98104 Order No.: 531679 SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE Certificate for Filing Proposed Short Plat In the matter of the short plat submitted for your approval,this Company has examined the records of the County Auditor and County Clerk of KING County,Washington,and the records of the Clerk of the United States Courts holding terms in said County,and from such examination hereby certifies that the title to the following described land situate in said KING County,to-wit: SEE SCHEDULE A(NEXT PAGE) VESTED IN: MING LEI TSENG AND YEN CHIN-YIN TSENG, HUSBAND AND WIFE C! YOF",Pl "; EXCEPTIONS: SEE SCHEDULE B ATTACHED AlOV 1 9 1998 RECEI e, ED CHARGE: $200.00 TAX: $ 17.20 Records examined to October 28, 1998 at 8:00 A.M. CHICAGO I I I LE INSURANCE COMPANY I" - By / - MIKE HARRIS/KEITH EISENBREY Title Officer (206) 628-5623 SHPLATA/12-5-90/EK ICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPA Order No.: 531679 SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE A (Continued) LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL A: THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH HALF OF SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE MONUMENT AT THE INTERSECTION OF BRONSON WAY NORTH (A COUNTY ROAD) AND RAILROAD AVENUE IN THE PLAT OF CAR WORKS ADDITION TO RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 15 OF PLATS, PAGE 47, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE NORTH 81°02'40" EAST A DISTANCE OF 85.18 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTERLINE OF PACIFIC COAST COMPANY'S RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY; THENCE NORTH 49°50'40" EAST A DISTANCE OF 372.81 FEET TO THE WESTERLY MARGINAL LINE OF STATE HIGHWAY NO. 2; THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGINAL LINE NORTH 22°42' 00" EAST A DISTANCE OF 100 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGINAL LINE A DISTANCE OF 100 FEET; THENCE NORTH 67°18' 00" WEST A DISTANCE OF 133 .75 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO A POINT 36 .00 FEET, MEASURED AT A RIGHT ANGLE FROM THE CENTERLINE OF SAID RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY PARALLEL TO SAID RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY A DISTANCE OF 100 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 67°18' 00" EAST A DISTANCE OF 133.75 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL B: THAT PORTION OF SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE MONUMENT AT THE INTERSECTION OF BRONSON WAY NORTH (A COUNTY ROAD) , AND RAILROAD AVENUE IN THE PLAT OF CAR WORKS ADDITION TO RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 15 OF PLATS, PAGE 47, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE NORTH 81°02'40" EAST A DISTANCE OF 85.18 FEET TO INTERSECTION OF CENTERLINE OF PACIFIC COAST COMPANY'S RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY; THENCE NORTH 49°50'40" EAST A DISTANCE OF 372.81 FEET TO THE WESTERLY MARGINAL LINE OF STATE HIGHWAY NO. 2; THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE NORTH 22°42' EAST A DISTANCE OF 200 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGINAL LINE A DISTANCE OF 50 FEET; THENCE NORTH 67°18' WEST A DISTANCE OF 133.75 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO A POINT 36 FEET MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES FROM THE CENTERLINE OF SAID RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY PARALLEL TO SAID RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY A DISTANCE OF 50 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 67°18' EAST A DISTANCE OF 133 .75 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Order No.: 531679 SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B This certificate does not insure against loss or damage by reason of the following exceptions: GENERAL EXCEPTIONS: A. Defects,liens,encumbrances,adverse claims or other matters,if any,created,first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires for value of record the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. B. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. C. Encroachments,overlaps,boundary line disputes,and any other matters which would be disclosed by an accurate survey and inspection of the premises. D. Easements or claims of easements not shown by the public records. E. Any lien,or right to lien,for contributions to employee benefit funds,or for state workers'compensation,or for services,labor,or material heretofore or hereafter furnished,all as imposed by law,and not shown by the public records. F. Liens under the Workmen's Compensation Act not shown by the public records. G. Any service,installation,connection,maintenance or construction charges for sewer,water,electricity or garbage removal. H. General taxes not now payable;matters relating to special assessments and special levies,if any,preceding or in the same becoming a lien. I. Reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; Indian tribal codes or regulations,Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, including easements or equitable servitudes. J. Water rights,claims,or title to water. K. THIS REPORT IS ISSUED AND ACCEPTED UPON THE UNDERSTANDING THAT THE LIABILITY OF THE COMPANY SHALL NOT EXCEED ONE THOUSAND DOLLARS($1000.00). • SHPLATB/031694/soc CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY ICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMP)._ Order No.: 531679 SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B (Continued) EXCEPTIONS A 1. RIGHT TO ENTER SAID PREMISES TO MAKE REPAIRS AND THE RIGHT TO CUT BRUSH AND TREES WHICH CONSTITUTE A MENACE OR DANGER TO UTILITY LINES LOCATED ON PROPERTY ADJOINING SAID PREMISES AS GRANTED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 3357849. a AFFECTS: PARCEL B. c 2. RIGHT TO ENTER SAID PREMISES TO MAKE REPAIRS AND THE RIGHT TO CUT BRUSH AND TREES WHICH CONSTITUTE A MENACE OR DANGER TO UTILITY LINES LOCATED ON PROPERTY ADJOINING SAID PREMISES AS GRANTED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 3357850. n AFFECTS: PARCEL A. s 3. EXCEPTIONS AND RESERVATIONS CONTAINED IN DEED: FROM: JENNIE SARTORI, ERSILIA M. SBARBORO, KATHERINE E. SARTORI, AND LAURA G. SARTORI RECORDED: MARCH 8, 1940 RECORDING NUMBER: 3089820 AS FOLLOWS: ALL COAL, MINERAL AND OIL IN AND UNDER THE SURFACE OF SAID LANDS WITH THE RIGHT TO MINE AND REMOVE THE SAME BUT WITHOUT THE RIGHT TO ENTER UPON THE SURFACE OF SAID LANDS FOR SUCH PURPOSES, AND PROVIDED THAT GRANTORS SHALL PROTECT THE SURFACE OF SAID LANDS FROM ALL DAMAGES ON ACCOUNT OF SUCH MINING. P AFFECTS: PARCEL A. c 4. EXCEPTIONS AND RESERVATIONS CONTAINED IN DEED: FROM: JENNIE SARTORI, ERSILIA M. SBARBORO, KATHERINE E. SARTORI, AND LAURA G. SARTORI RECORDED: JANUARY 3, 1941 RECORDING NUMBER: 3139175 AS FOLLOWS: ALL COAL, MINERAL AND OIL IN UNDER AND UPON SAID PREMISES WITH THE POWER TO ENTER UPON SAID PREMISES AND TAKE ALL USUAL, NECESSARY OR CONVENIENT MEANS OF WORKING, GETTING AND TAKING AWAY SAID COAL OIL AND CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY HCAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMP. Order No.: 531679 SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B (Continued) EXCEPTIONS MINERALS. x AFFECTS: A PORTION OF PARCEL B. 5. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NUMBER 3950, ESTABLISHING A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT TO RECAPTURE EXPENDITURES FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO SUNSET BOULEVARD NORTH, ESTABLISHING THE BOUNDARIES OF THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT AND ESTABLISHING THE AMOUNT OF CHARGE THEREFOR, RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8605230898. A FEE IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,467.20 IS ESTABLISHED WITH RESPECT TO SAID PREMISES. AFFECTS: PARCEL B. K 6. DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTOR: JANET TSENG, A SINGLE PERSON, AS HER SEPARATE ESTATE, AS NOMINEE FOR MING-LEI TSENG AND YEN CHIN-YIN TSENG, HUSBAND AND WIFE TRUSTEE: CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY BENEFICIARY: EMMA CUGINI, A SINGLE PERSON, AS HER SEPARATE ESTATE AMOUNT: $ 92, 000.00 DATED: JANUARY 03, 1994 RECORDED: JANUARY 05, 1994 RECORDING NUMBER: 9401052047 LOAN NUMBER: THE AMOUNT NOW SECURED BY SAID DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERMS UPON WHICH THE SAME CAN BE DISCHARGED OR ASSUMED SHOULD BE ASCERTAINED FROM THE HOLDER OF THE INDEBTEDNESS SECURED. a AFFECTS: PARCEL B. rt 7. THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION IN THIS COMMITMENT IS BASED ON INFORMATION PROVIDED WITH THE APPLICATION AND THE PUBLIC RECORDS AS DEFINED IN THE POLICY TO ISSUE. THE PARTIES TO THE FORTHCOMING TRANSACTION MUST NOTIFY THE TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY PRIOR TO CLOSING IF THE DESCRIPTION DOES NOT CONFORM TO THEIR EXPECTATIONS. S H P LATB3/12-12-90/E K CHICAGO I I 1 LE INSURANCE COMPANY • [ICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMP/. / Order No.: 531679 SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B (Continued) EXCEPTIONS x NOTE 1: GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAID IN FULL: YEAR: 1998 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 172305-9077-08 LEVY CODE: 2100 ASSESSED VALUE-LAND: $160, 500.00 ASSESSED VALUE-IMPROVEMENTS: $ 10, 000.00 AMOUNT BILLED AND PAID: $2,215.30 AFFECTS: PARCEL A. o NOTE 2 : GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAID IN FULL: YEAR: 1998 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 172305-9082-01 LEVY CODE: 2100 ASSESSED VALUE-LAND: $80,200.00 ASSESSED VALUE-IMPROVEMENTS: $48,400.00 AMOUNT BILLED AND PAID: $1, 076.11 AFFECTS: PARCEL B. p NOTE 3 : A SURVEY HAS BEEN RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8412039001, A COPY OF WHICH IS HERETO ATTACHED. 0 AFFECTS: INCLUDES OTHER PROPERTY z NOTE 4 : THE FOLLOWING MAY BE USED AS AN ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON THE DOCUMENTS TO BE RECORDED TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF R.C.W. 65.04. SAID ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS NOT A SUBSTITUTE FOR A COMPLETE LEGAL DESCRIPTION WHICH MUST ALSO APPEAR IN THE BODY OF THE DOCUMENT: PORTIONS OF THE NORTH HALF OF SECTION 17-23-5. AS OF OCTOBER 28, 1998, THE TAX ACCOUNTS FOR SAID PREMISES ARE 172305-9077-08 AND 172305-9082-01. END OF SCHEDULE B SH PIATB3/12-12-90/EK CHICAGO 1 111E INSURANCE COMPANY • ' CHICAGO '1'1'1'LE i SURANCE COMPANY 1800 COLOMBIA CHNTER, 701 5TH AVE, SHATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104 IMPORTANT: This is not a Survey. It is furnished as a convenience to locate the land indicated hereon with reference to streets and other land. No liability is assumed by reason of reliance hereon. Northwesterly portion of Section 17-23-5 •—,,..r. - IS°7.30 I , rr r.raa y„ N. ITN T. a+....t I..T4.,. ,, .. a '. _Y; ' ; rZINN =Ipda 8® ' r , j ,4 rte. ..�. 7A�A• 9.'f• ®IBBBBBBB�1 -' I • *. * Mai ...?"''' . •ar,t LX.,:iW,z rg..,:wiligi , 0 ` IL YMION �. 111MI MT ii A illiti:,.r I. • • .w 26" .1 ,+, •'r ,,.. YI :., . A'N.hs; ss 30 —.- — Znil WIZa .O 1::1.tL _.r 7� 1 7aa 2 5 f _� • , '1 1• LI- ' 1 1-e*;''', 4 7 I VA' :V '.7 I estn° .4.:0..7 4' 'Inpelir'' N „..,• , i.4.11 z „. 1. .-1, i„. ., Tizwil . - ili `,r .er I , ./'.,.a. ,I. '' r a'z. .aM1..°i ,.. $W.1 yl •ti h • a,„•.„,a . ; . ra'�. r :.ramN. ..,�— E gm ,.. ' .BROOKS ST._ GI, r u .✓ I ,... 7 . [ _ a w a'. .al.K ... , . t M l a, u W II WI .4a 4 . i • '�? 13:1 al. V n a=� VVp • V •^ �_EirjIf/ l.y 1 -.. G• 000 u 1 w'ry°+ /..Z •u..'°°..° ..r.3 ,a or sir ! \��+ �, V'S . L b 7 II rw.• I.'..•la...: /l . 7a ,^7 .''''''" a a_ .r ©� •�.'' ;• © �j n. I „" /� S, ,1 .... N. ...« 2ND+.. ST. _ T.• ay. ✓� Y 4- A�{, , �' R • _. 7" St ,.13 ,V , •id, Z ar+moo ".07 • , L.„SF/. :4;... `Y�' „ 0. ....1• .•.•1 ..., ' t i • ,)1CJ ......• j .,wn ::.:P•.. .' I ,•• p4 ♦ '�'� M• I•. _ ... . r •` •• ♦1/ .r. ,a, a± .i.•i.° iB :t'„•• •SN4 •r. . I 4rO 1 a . : elk n — j ....• le• ,.; ;�! r J1 {�� ,Y e. s 4J r,1 i,r.J�j� IIc f - _ --{,,„ W 7 !I . .ski..,..t• ....,,,<.4 -.e. -----' ..... ... . ., .0,,, ,.,,Q.,, ..., 1 is . i... • ,.,÷4,. .-- , ,-- 4' t r a4:' 'r© ar le h J�� A MA P .. - - - First Arie-r,c . Tittr INSURANCE COMPANY ri r1 Filed f at_Request_of .O2_k1L To l OD Name MINC LEI 1SENl aND ' .N CHIN-YIN TSENc • c/o Paul H. Ch.•ng Address 10604 N.E. 57ch -` Kirklar.d, WA 98033 • - ` f`") :`�•—' - - cityandState \ / 1 5 D. 0 L t a' Statutory Warranty Deed THE GRANTOR FRANK REPENSHEK, as his separate estate for and in consideration of TEN DOLLARS AND OTHER VALUABLE CONSIDERATIONS in hard paid, conveys and warrants to MING LEI TSENC and YEN CHIN-YIN TSENG, husband and wife .he foliowiie described real estate,situated in the County of King ,State of \1'ashi4gtor.: - SEE ATTACHED LEGAL DESCRIPTION. S:hJEC. TO: All covenants, conditions, restric,ions, reservations and easementI(eff, CiTy KING COUNTY NO V EXCISE TAX PAID 9 1998 636675 r Dated this it h day of May ,19 81 r ti: ti N!►. .\• ai11� X`hJ!11Aa►�.1� t (srm.) "FRANK REPEN::,P.ii, (sa ) STATE OF WASHINGTON, ss. County Or this day personally appeared before me FRANK REPENSHEK to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the -'ithin and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he signed the same as his free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and ptuposes therein mentioned. GIVEN under my band and official seal this 8t h day of „av ,19 81 • • Nnt✓c Public in and for the State of f4•asningtoe, rending of .i. .-....!! ct E'• .•' irsrt 27. 'Ibwnsl.ip 23 1,brth,1--3-' •••••'".. :7-. I. ir.: I'r,r:r.,,j•, ,-.._-,: :r...3:"::- tit LcrIL-A-c3 .1F..- tollows: Ii.-•::nn:ni: l• rnrnire—• _t :t.: int,--rnc.:-tic:-. o: Eionscr l..z.y .orth wounty 1-.,-.11roy.' Av,nul 17' '-l..., pl.: cf CAP WCPY.L ADCIT1ct: 7..7 REMOt., c_Loi.-ling to tt..• pl..-. tr...:•vi r:..--or;.,-i i n VO.i UTI.' .”..' of Flats, page 47, tvceroc: of Fir Co.:-..-.1.y, W..”.-:liingtr; ther.ce North Ell''02.1f!" Ecct rir-.1'.• ft-• t to ir.tersecticr of center lino cf Pacific Co,s,:-r (.:(171..7,r12.''E r.nilio-c, right of way; thence North 4925C*4.:" Ez:s.: 272.bl feet tc the Westerly mr.rginal line of state Highwiy No. 2; thence z•Icrrj sz ic Iv..s:Lrly rr. rgir.:.1 linr. North 2242 East 100 feet to the true point, of begir.ning; ther.co continuing along said Westerly ir.?rginal lin,:, 100 feei.; thence North 67'1E' West 133.75 feet, wore or less, to a point 36.0e feet, measured at a rigl.: angle free', the center line nf said railroad 0 .4 right of way; .4 thence' Southwesterly parallel to said railroad right of way 100 feet; U, thence South 67°18" East 133.75 feet, more or less, to the true point . .-1 of beginning. Situate in the City of Eenton, County of King, State of Washington. ... rr-----N ,..... ,,,, .A ("4-'/...• 3! • .1. .:! , . , ..: .- .•I '. ,',',- ' — .. . 1 . . — 1 ... ' i . 1 - ' '• . .„.-4 : -• •• . !'.'1'...4'....1 , ,,. :„ ..• 4; . .i•t' • , 4 •,• ;,-:11-1..P. i ;,,It„-• • , i ...- t .. .: .• 1 ' ' ilit., • , I ,.t. .z.. •, .. : tl; ' t•-.. ..:.; '• Itifkli.: . . -i I 7ra 'f 7' ... . ' ' : ..a ...•'.'.... . / /. . . .,.',A04;i:(•'‘,.'. !.. ' • ',a"..• 1 A. , ..,,,,I....1 .. ., • . - :4- t: 7.t. - 1 i.,:111614.:.7:5f,t 1,..1., ,..ii•-rli'tti!'' . ••••-i ',..,' '. - `- o TEES i,aa rROYIoso roe aseoaeu.0 Vela I 0 i FILED FOR RECORD AT REQUEST OF Independent Escrow Inc. Q 77 HELLS AVE. S., IC N Renton, WA 98055 0 t7 I order No. 274973-1 W • , i WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO MING-LEI TSENG * 211...Sunset Blvd. N. Renton, WA. 98055 - Escrow No. 93553 a iti l QUIT CLAIM DEED F. + N THE GRANTOR JANET TSENG, A SINGLE PERSON, AS HER SEPARATE ESTATE, AS NOMINEE TOR" M1 ' MING-LEI TSENG AND YEN CHIN-YIN TSENG, HUSBAND AND WIFE N c for and in consideration of NOMINEE TO PRINCIPAL o W conveys and quit claims to MING LEI TSENG AND YEN CHIN-YIN TSENG, HUSBAND AND WIFE N the following described real estate, situated in the County of Ring, State of Washington, r together with all after acquired title of the grantor(e) therein: t SEE SCHEDULE "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART OF BY REFERENCE. t' APPROVED IN PORN AND CONTENT BY: /"1 L r/t)'•c s 11i i .• 1 .i 1; ..- 1, chit o • a DATED: February 7, 1994 •.7gli4/Pir":74-i/Ma4 T TSENG i , -•( STATE OF WASHINGTON, /J I ss' :;3 County of +(iht& 1 . i I hereby certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that -- -4tJ 1 TSRNC- ,..-A is the person who appeared before mc,and said person acknowledged that(She_)signed this instrument and • acknowledged it to be 1-1 ERfree and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in this instrument. ::In rrrrr� Dated: oZ-7-9�I Q0VtJN$,y s • 1,31 '*). t j y E Notary Public in and for the State 11 Washington. ,r - residing ar SWntow- i 11;ViV..4.74tt al I•,.4% ...: N�0-.-- 'tlr appointment expires (0-19-977 4 i .,,ism,1171 11 4 rr4n....t• I o , TI1/11►AQ 1RDVIDRD TOR RECORDER'S Dili ► J FILED FOR RECORD AT REQUEST OF Independent Escrow Inc. _o 77 WELLS AVE. S., IC `T Renton, WA 98055 Order No. 274973-10 0 _,, 0 WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO 8 S MING-LEI TSENG 217 Sunset glvd. N. Oi Keaton, WA. 98055 of ; ti { Escrow No. 93553 p tNt\� '4 Q' QUIT CLAIM DEED 8 N THE GRANTOR JANET TSENG, A SINGLE PERSON, AS HER SEPARATE ESTATE, AS NOMINEE POf5 N j MING-LEI TSENG AND YEN CHIN-TIN TSENG, HUSBAND AND WIFE Cl for and in conoideration of NOMINEE TO PRINCIPAL *' W conveys and quit claims to MING LEI TSENG AND YEN CHIN-YIN TSENG, HUSBAND AND WIFH the following described real estate, situated in the County of Xing, State of Washington, • together with all after acquired title of the grantor(e) thereinl t I SEE SCHEDULE "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART OF BY REFERENCE. APPROVED IN FORM AND CONTENT BY: /"i L r i 11•c/ I a 0 DATED: February 7, 1994 -A IP,/11y' r�i-te'1rn JJ6NET TSENG J �4 _t yet • TE OF WASHINGTON ) ) as. ' NTY Or Ring ) 4 .n this day personally appeared before me JANET TSENG known to be the individual(e) described '. and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowleged that SHE signed the ',t' e an HER free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposee therein mentioned. :' VEN under my hand and official Beal thin day of Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at •:. yr —12 My commission expires: �; Af yr.: f. . _ ., r, 1n • O III =.1:1 oft .f I 1 . CIUICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.T.A.COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A Order 294245 • .`_ YoorNG.:CUGINI LEGAL DESCIU1 TTON laHIDTT t i A PORTION OF SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 22 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN ii R KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: 1•x) BEGINNING AT MONUMENT AT INTERSECTION OF BRONSON WAY NORTH (A COUNTY ROAD),.AND `[ RAILROAD AVENUE IN THE PLAT OF CM WORKS ADDITION TO RENTONI .( j; THENCE NORTH 01'02'40' EAST 05.10 FEET TO INTERSECTION OF CENTERLINE OF PACIFIC • .l COAST COMPAIY'S RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY; THENCE NORTH 49'50'40' EAST 372.01 FEET TO THE WESTERLY MARGINIAL LINE OF STATE HIGIRIAY NO. 2; THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE NORTH22'42' EAST 200 FEET TO TILE TRUE POINT OF V BEGINNING; ' THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGINAL LINE 50 FEET; THENCE NORTH 67'10' WEST 133.75 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO A POINT 36 FEET MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES FROM TIME CENTERLINE OF SAID RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY; 1 THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY PARALLEL TO SAID RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY 50 FEET; ' THENCE SOUTH 67'10' EAST 173.75 FEET, MOIRE OR LESS, TO TIME TRUE POINT OF,' i BEGINNING. . er a, CD f. • 'r • =mg psu (is, tasvg •_ •l) 's,saoa Iwl Z! •Lyjso;twv !Emma 10,1eo11 fI tom-9 sikx gai >ntsea seessu toy en RTTAg•O °'.s'% Jet 43114 •T2Tlsa goal ! TnTsuD T W A Et-It t 2Tom my Twygme Twit As ! 4% WI' ' 116 3F' aieI to 'rva -- ,to9,14 0o�sd� �'fs4u%s'•�,8 i! es iT 't'I Pe IIo Alt qs Wz •a •a i• $t Ala re es uZg t Po no LTA Ks !Lea; soevosig sap •tr min i0 Au inns es n/s or is lit itt Po oA3 (g0T9g11 siIia sr) WSJ VIP u oT Pg* L g Atto 3t tt s T.L9 x3 404 osz b rq% sT Si ;oTA0 sk/a •a 'si Ps is s1 wg% M tti SL•VVt .Pt•l9 i isay oft u szti.ts a 111 tuft g RA 1=4/ .t3 Pjg s409g is Al Tag Lt* *AS 0% si tEELC I 4%044, a % 20/0 'V * Pe s° °Z assus* *Ts je seTsosrsssu7 Inn os si IFT.0 t 1 „ o' ao.tIP a Rs tAl (.0"td L%uswo 9vTA L♦ sd '*letd CT to wigged ds PPY imz A rsa AT •Att pt0MT1SS Cas (; oj 40) !Wog Lst nos"sem so luZsseszesaj • t la stssm ..mos se ss;aasurso seta is sop ttosd si+sac ltaTo4 disc• 3; 01 Ws •s s las4s,re� %roof, •TTTood 0AI is v *AM a 0A4 sa 1PfTaT9EPS 11a e'3ITd = Ct d P• � . o*S gT 67,c%s Ai OT a 30 4i 05 /Ts Du � ,[saS )t s L3 :arm 37s scrips q, amm zo pus rem) 'Immo 'Qs *Al of sMUM,ssodsnd sail MUM, so= WWI as % ISa� ttozon e ,d; oti.L itIzoR3ov 'TIT I oUTta•_ t TeJnsi era OTtorjs stuilps '**T:toW i* Qtssls p44/u 1 os *al* V Uri 4TsT1110 'MAT Ttrrtn C211 41$ e:''r..L Ia! d'r,LcCC Ct-•TC u'sa sates z4 ' aoou'u-S5 f•v 1•nTv r• 'Itriar uosTI•LT 0% t ir1, c ri1i: 411.1i Ll'r`'1L•13 12991.IiC'.;IS 3" . . : .! • ._ • ...1‘. .• :.I- tila a� _ - i - -1: ,,1 i a' -1' / \ . 'sat Leo 31 43 ,- 1; duly 28 43 41.00. 3115?8$, /rank Rapo ib ck and Berbera I tapenshok, husk, and of, to United. States of Maria*, meting thru the Niderail PubLts 'Iusitig Authority. Theh underdtigat 4, herely grants t s ant sa osssat for seas line pas- poses tokiftalaklzk 8p, across, over and/or undo: the .toldee prop- arty sitinkaw: the holy 100 ft of the lily 150 tt of a 10-ft s strip in See. 17, ••y_. ?wp 2S ll.lt. S 34.11.11., parallel .to.,i-a4Joising on thc,east the •easterly line of -the 1'asilis O*SS8 Oompany'a A.R. lit of , ft strip bsini. note 'particular Mssaatols: Oonasssiaj at s'a la. .r as she intersection of BroII*a:3t "'i'o �. Ave,. La Car 'do she mod. to �,� T�s 13(County load) And yl,ilsr� ':1" 81,024i�0a a 85.18 ft to the inteaa*stion of the�*eater ,line 47, jof a NI d tt- RA. rt or way; th j 49'30'40' I )7241 ft to the 117 marginal ; • line of State Highway Ho. 2; th along od marginal lisp I22'42• I =: 250 ft; th 1 67.18' >r 149.75 rt to the lily line of sd R.R. rt of way at pt is the true pt r t imaisg; th 8 67.11, 8 10 ft; th Sty 10 ft distant to (at rt angles) urf= ) the sd Sly line of R.R.Oi re of ways* • the arly margin of the above dos Bronson Way; th Sly on ad Ely sir,s* gin so sd Sly line or R.K. rt of way; t8 Ulj on sd s .line of R.R. .r rt of way to the true pt of t ginning ,� The grantee shall have at all times that sight or tall and trio io- ;; H . sress to and agree., 'ram sad property for all purposes is sesaeetta ' f... with ad *assegai vitb the understanding that the grant.. shall be responsible for all unnecessary a it ceases greater sy the sz' ; , . erolso of the .rights and prit11 n ;, S heroin gat, ,, (ilk DRAB).''! , Prank set'+►nawelt, Grantor. f Barbara Rep nshdt, t, 01iat4l. •- ••. kew dul 28 43 Sy Prank Repeashek & darilara Rapes- .`▪ :. 411 shah, tar, of doss Dobson, Jr. , BP Baresat Linton as Peb 27 46 . • : ••• Attached is rider as follows! AA further eonsidara+tioa far :` ' t . this easement, the gra&tora shall hay. the right to•,mot suni- F: tarp sewers to the grantee's tzna& sass line. ,,tit'esysaes$Loa shall be for Lee benefit of the land over wh the whore dsaaribodl assonant runs. The Grantor &hull Goatract d ireetly Iadtai gal charges mude b,p the City o: Renton, tot stags sorrily', und with all rules and regulations of the Roston ewer Dya.ttusat. (filed Renton Sensing Authority, B. 89 Renton, Vat I.Z. Perry, M$),;;',MI . • . : 1,011 6 4,0 :08992J "oa t 4 1 .. : Co iri ' d 5Co st mart. ori, r ;ili!ti 'r ��ar��ro '".nt�ar:.^,� - -lartor i ac:d:.aLra --ertcr.. to i..aux .arac&nak in cv,rtar;. --e,)ar_sPhek nlAr fY gra c a c 3. 1 r,,_ LatoJ; ::a c.1 ::1g. aulNty In ►or► :1 yor:•c f 111o.3 17,tr 23:.e 5 ewm, df : neg at mon at i;tso of BronsondayUU.:rtht oo road)and Railroad wa in the N latuf4,n= :lurks 6ddtolentoa;th :i.81 .X.'43' d.85.18f t to int am ofoent uomgany's railroad ;tn g.496 53' ;0" 2.3'12.81ft tuthe wlyagn1 linaof -State alghway No2 ; th-1 ad w1yngn1 tiue:i.22.4E' 133, tto truepointof Jeg ;th cont el ad ttly mEn1 lineli)Jft ;thN.67•l0"1 133.75ft, a1,: _ a point a3C.0oft, mard at riphtan,gles,frot..t..ecent: lineofed railroad right of way ;th may tlt lid railroad rightof way 100ft; th 6 67.18'E 133.75ft , al,tothsta true paintof beginning 4 Provided aade=oept,however,that grantorsexospt fromtheoperation of thisdd ,and reserve untotheLeelyea ha,allooal,aineralancoil inandunde: the aurfeoe ofedlenda t«ithtnerightto sine andreaovethesame but with- outt:.eziga to enter upon;.he snrfaoe ofsd la2ds for such purpa, and ivd that grantors shailproteotthe surface ofsdlande fr a all damages onn000untof such mining d Jennie :.artori j �rsilia li Sbarboro Lat::erine ` Sartori Laura G Sartori Cityand coafaenFrano..;ooCoif Koh 5 403y Sannie Sartori,.-railiak SOarboro,Xatherine S Sartori and Lours 0 Sartori bf JohnJ Massa np for city and eats afrsd comer Aug :11tt.$ 43( !93) al i Philson 'o. tenton fld )yetco fteiNmilksal �t 32-4 crnt�- spa 3alavr .55 Ire:: .5C' t.-t .0 ry .. ';artcrrt , 1:rsilis '.:�$% 'acco and sitt'.• �,.me , ,.19:lt� , Y; r... o'crs of t.e� I, r3` Rill t. tent of Seeaie sertokt, Y?. !cam 44 a: : .ore dead and f:1..1is �bsr cr.1 , :.a:tf na �•tovanna� ei t .., F ter; or!, and irsars a,:•arto:i, t div t to Tinn Cugioi of Renton, ft Fp oy and )ter to .sop the fire in Ic oe A ptn of sto 17 Tp 23 cr 5 was nor* partie 4 tl Peg at man at iaternta of Brun can Way 1t (0e rapid) sod Railroad Ave in the plot of Car Weits add to lamps, th d Q1'01'4O' t 85.18 ft to interatn of easter In of :'aatfis Ovast Cat £Llreed rt of gay th 49°5O'40° it 3111.51 ft to the 1117 mare . la of 3$ats Rey is L A i to el:i Ltd elf anrgl la ti &EMS' It 240 ft to the true pot, t �, ! on cont ale ea wly mare lay 80 ft, ih I $V 18' a lhs.fb ft nrl to / r pt oadO0 f of ays tddsallyrt angles from pitt ad railroad hrteaster Xs of way SOot, tlt 3 ad -� railroad rt way, 67.18' 1 134.73 ft e+ri to true poll exeeptia ; sad rsaory a4 oats tom gtere thstr h exrs ado and sena oil Dual, oil end miasra7ls lying IN s.der and upon sd prows i.. with the vernier to eater upon ad prom and take all soma, less or convenis:.t skean of narking, getting and taking away es1 coal oil and '-inerals. This oenvayanaa is stada under and .:urcloant to a eartala ord.ir — of the suer cnurt of taw ontd on 'et 15-40 in tht certain rraoeod.isg . thin rending entitled La the nutter of this est o!' /fatale :Grtori also is as OioYs as !darter', daM, bains probate file Xs 4868d of the lilts of tar olio of ad mart. &ma :„Bortori amino Niarberbero NatMriee 3.3arterl;, as axes of the last will and toot of irmni a .artoii, alas ® ka as Gismos.* Sartori, deed S rsilia U.Sbartoro Indio Katherine C,Sartori., ind i v Lstura G.oartort, ilsdiv Marin Co ihil Nov l.4G b; Henry 7.8artori, Trailt' M.tsborbore and eatherine L,aart+sxl torso of toe Lest will en" test of Zonal* Se ort aloe SD as hievana. Sartori, deed, and 1-$ trailia M.t.barbor'o Sitbarin* &.Sartori end Lour C.Sertorl , eel dor4rn L.b'nrtiselll rp for Col res at San t',nrsel no 3-E5-45 (M12ea Dobsyoa k 8oa, Vii Ord Avu Reataa.) D Zan :5-41 5139174 _ .. ^ �. i O 4 i • ...�.� w 1 ..__.. • •� "K".i r 4 �: r:, "s '-�4`f�i� !. r� % 7 v�•.`'k4,, .:1• r.. �a+ katLe CERTIFICATE 1,the undersigned, Maxi n� E. 10 for Clark of the • __ + ,. 1ti.4.:.,; rti I1.:41•14.ut :ii C:, of Renton, Washington, certify that this Is a '^:e crdcorrect copy of C)r t Act Pit [_ tk°D. �4;O • "ry..r PK ; and Sued t r; 4 A r•r"ryl b�c. _ ,_r,ned 7 day of rr , rLf.cF �.IJ� THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON �-' r.rk ORDINANCE NO. 3950 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, ESTABLISHING A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT TO RECAPTURE EXPENDITURES FOR IMPROVEMENT TO SUNSET BOULEVARD NORTH, ESTABLISHING THE BOUNDARIES OF THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT AND ESTABLISHING THE AMOUNT OF CHARGE THEREFOR THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I: There is hereby created a special assessment district "or roadway improvements to Sunset Boulevard North, an area which is more particularly described as follows; t.^ See Exih.ibit "A" attached hereto which is attached hereto and mode a part hereof as if fully set forth herein. A map of the benefited area is attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein. SECTION It: Persons developing properties accessing onto S:.rr.set Boulevard North, or persons redeveloping property accessing onto Sunset Boulevard North, shall pay a fee for the privilege of accessing onto Sunset Boulevard North in addition to the payment of any utility connection permit fees and in addition to the general facllrty and trunk connection charge, the following addition3l fees: co • Based on the contract costs for installation of curb and gutter Z; 155.95/lineal foot), sidewalk ($14.00,square yard), storm drainage = '' •; I57.'%/lineal foot), street sighting ($15.16/lineal foot), and '+ •' uncFeyroundino ($15.47ilineal foot). FL.r properties on Sunset Boulevard North within the limits defined on the Exhibits. �+ SECTION II!: Monies paid by means of this special assessment district 'J • nV s shall be pain into the City's Forward Thrust Street Fund. (.I O• SECT ION IV: This special assessment district shall exist for a period o of ten ;la) years following passage of this Ordinance. ,154 t11: xZ �•j� s• � ga , ->e-.. is � •-1- -7%. r - v ...^P .3.2. r.S¢ t�y =•.t J -.'►4 ./ �, �r' A. '.0 tltl ' -r = kr f. .k j'Fr ! i y,t:. i^yi'B ,.. -...; '�' _°!'i Y y;;�:� .t+�r7S,A. r.w. %, F „ _ L: -d; `rtPS► :'r%,. •<ti4t. +h'_'wac: `c �.(' �n►r =± .. ;ate s- SIa ;�` '+- ;1-J a9rr. a R F i= . 4771,'; ORDINANCE NO. 3950 fL SECTION V: This ordinance shall be effective upon its passaae, approval and thirty days after publication. PASSE. BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 21st day of October, 1985. a . ,.,),_ 7,,, z ,,,A .-i-ii f e--x, Ell Marilyn • . tersen, Deputy City Clerk trill APPRCVED BY THE MAYOR this 21st day of October, 1985. rn :.i Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Lr) C-1 ; Ap ro'.ed a:,:, fcrr- r , • .i. • Lawrence J. 1';a,'rfer• City Attorney Date of Publication: October 25, 1985 I I r = d 7 L _ _ I 1 , 111 -2- ,.,., ✓+tr.:.1 rG. •••• �Cy yt !*.� aktert.: y'1475 1:i 7{ • #s �F• ^'ttt ;` .: "t�'� ' -"' �Y'7.t-15: 4:.r .f*' 11 ff.`}F.i4} `_x,,• .tc jt •ri.i s@"}r S�• s.•+'4.,r�:r-;c• ` •S a f.. -: ,.:C?ire .t' • • • wN: r�;c ;Z Cia1P:MLE t,0. 395C EXHIBIT A • Slfal ELK). N. E. 1Z14D IM411D%ENEENTS lTFh1 ND. p.IPfiCN F fCf LATEOIERS FE SEC tlon 17, Towrnship 3 ticrth, Pange 5 East. 0.00 L.F. $0.00 A portion of the N -th„txt c}rarter. Beginning st the Interserliat of C&'sty Road aid Patirnad Ave.; Thence N 81 02 4r)E, 85.18 feet; 'Thence N 49 50 4C E, 372.81 feet to the lesierly'erg In of State Highway flirter 2 and the True Beginning; Tierce N 67 18 CO W 133.75 feet wore cr less to a point 36 feet East faun the center line of the raiireed track; Thence SouttH,Ftiter l y aw parallel and 36 feet d!starce to salt certtrIIne Northerly ra-g In of State H;away tb. 2; 03 Thecae Easterly and Norther ly along said •• h icdway to tte True Beginning. Less Stale tl!g!wie.. Se:i►rn 17, ?c+r•st.ip 3 !orti:, Range 5 East I(b.00 L.F. 11373.4ir A per t r cry c= -ate r,t~,test quarter of the kr•thwcst warner. Eeg inn irtg at t;tc n-ure nt at the irtersectia of Carty Boa+ and Railroad Ave.; Thence N 81 02 40 E, 85.18 feet; Tierce N 49 50 40 E, 372.81 feet to the Neste:ly erg In cf State Hlgh,u} ttn •tr 2 tc the True&rlrr.irg; Thence along said ►testerly margin N 22 42 00 E 100 feet; Thence N 67 18 00 A 133.75 feet; Thence Souttwesterly parallel end a distance cf 36 feet fro r the miter-line of Right of ley Track 100 feet; Thence S 67 18 00 E 13.3.75 feet to tte.rue Etg!rning; Less State Hlgtr' . 3. Section 17, Tantcship 23 tbr-th,Rage 5 Eat. 1C0.00 L.F. S2934.40 6e3lnning at the centerline of Peclflc Coast . • Right of Way et a polr.t which beers N 81 02 40 E 85.18 feet fron the irrtersectlat of Branson Way N. and Pal!r cad Ave., Renton; Theme H 49 50 40 E 372.81 feet to the Westerly margin of C1ate Highway Pkrber 2; Therm along said nic+Hey northerly 100 feet; Theme True Beginrtiry; . Thee Norther ly ICC! feet; -.�• Thence N 67 18 00 W 1:.75 feet; Throe Scuthwester I y pare 1 ie r to center 1 Ina Bel Ivey Right of Way and X, feet tte efron 10L feet; Thence S 67 I8 00 E to the Tre Eegir ing. • • ' .3;p„S."a'r�" ��(x H•�1 '`-r'.+M '�` t�:'i-•'ri,.h�ef-.a.�-.Y,Y 6� � i.�... ."�,�T 1��csS "ey �` �. �?`� ..�•"� v; F{' y. •w`CY +. sJ!4�r ,4 _ ,,a,, .eg 4Z�•_E .•,�.> 5s:.`�iiw'f''(. '•�fj,,,,n, .e.�. r,G�. c'r .�_ � �� �` T-�" rt. - '�'- 44. ..-•• . a:n, r + '..� t Pf ORDI...1:CE ::u. 3950 4. Seel Ion 17, To.n-hip Z5 Ncrth, Range 5 Eact. 50.00 L.F. S1467.20 Beginning at the intersection of Canty Fond and Railroad Ave.; There N 81 02 40 E 85.18 feet to ite centerline of Pacif lc Coast Railway Right of Way; Theme N 49 50 40 E 372.81 feet to the Westerly aergIn of Stare Hlghv Reber 2; Thence N 22 42 00 E along said Nesteriy • in.-gln 2!0 feet to the True Dag innirr; Thence curt lnuirg 50 feet; Theme N 67 18 00 W 133.75 feet none or less toe point 36 feet East of and rreasu;ed at Right gargles to the centerline of said Rai Ivey Right of key; Them Sarthuesteriy pa-al lel to said Right of Kay 50 foet; Thence S 67 18 Ot,E 133.75 test acre a- less To the True P,,s ing. 5. Se_-tlui 17, Tanship North, Range 5 East. 10).00 L.F. S2934.40 Beginnirc at tte int section of the Ritnaey margin cf &rnson key ttY !, boor t re Wattriy rangir.of State 1114,..ey Neter Tune N 4'1 E aiag the higNey 441.93 feet to the True begin::g; There ccrl lr•ulna t; 22 44 31 E 1Q) feet hence N 67 15 29 k to tie Easter l y fang in of Fac l f lc Coast Right t of Fay; Thence Saatrcr;y along said Right of Hai to D a cclr.t t: 67 15 29 i+ fran the True Eegl nlrg; The.><t S 67 15 25_ to the True [zglrnlrg. 6. Section 17, Toirship 2.3 North, Range 5 East. 137.9E L.F. S2153.87 Beginning at tte Intarseetlai of the fts-therIy margin of irffsur, $y forth with tte hesl e i y rrar g in of State Highway Nrber 7; Thence N 22 44 3; E alcrn the high+ey 541.93 feet 10 the True Begirnirlc: Thence cu t ini Irg N 22 44 31 E 137.9E feet; Theme 1:67 1529Wto the East.ariywergin of Pao!fic Ccest Right of fray; Thence Sarttreriy a!ag said Right of Way to a point N 67 15 29 w frun the True Beginnirg; Tknoe S 67 15 29 E to the True Brgirrirg; 7. So-tics 17, Tarsi;, 25 North, Farge 5 East. 100.00 L.F. $1561.00 Be;lnr,irc at the IMersetim of the ttrttrr,-ly margin of Ere sn Fay tt.-th r!th the frry erly aargln of State Hignley ?trtEr 2; Them Iv 22 44 31 E atorg tore htgtrey 679.91 feet to tte True Begim I.7; Tana contlrJing N 22 44 31 E 1tX) feet; Tner 3 N 67 15 29 W to the Easter r y rrerrg I n c f tto Fa I f lc Coast Rlstrt of ray; Tu-ce Sa.t 1y almy said :iyn` of .ey to a point N 67 15 29 trap tte True a:gitttlrg; 1.-erne S 67 15 29 E to the True Eeg i m l rg lr„ Stale highway. :D; ..`J^ rA ; ' r'p w ,Y '� i : ` e � a . '� ti'- 4 . ' 1 .� fy r"1 . es 7rt . .*, : 4,A-, ...?K;: A 3.w1.c . _ �• •• 1,y4s g t ORDINANCE NO. 3950 8. Secticn 17, Township 23 North, Page 5 East. 225.00 L.F. $5170.50 A portion of the Nrthwest giar-fe- of the Northeast quarter; Beginning at the Intersection of the Ell Easterly margin of Pacific Coast Railroad Right of Way with the Nbrthxly margin of J Third Ave.N.; Thence Northeasterly along said Railroad Right of Way 225 feet; Thence S 67 15 29 E 16.4.58 feet to the iWesterly line of State Highway; Thence Southwesterly along said highway to the Northerly line of said Third Abe. N.; Thence Northwesterly along said Ave. 115 feet to the Beginning. Less Stale HIghwey. 1 9. Section 17, Township 23 Ncaih, Ram jet 5 East. 75.00 L.F. £2753.55 w A port!ch of the northwest qar:car of the tbrtteast quarter. Ettnnlr at the in/el-E.:Alan of toe Easter, Iy eercin of Pacific t tal In c !fight of y with the tbritrx'y rah^L: cf ?h.hrd Ave. N.; ?O Duce tbrite�=!riy Pict, s :a f'ai Irmd Rict:i of Way 225 feet to the True Pcirt cf Beginning; wt Thence tinuirtg Nortrea eriy 75 feet; _ Thence S 67 15 29E 56 I E f e' 10 the Wester l y lire of the State H;ge.a); ` Thence Swtt:wester I; elan s:io h.ichcy 75.46 feet; Thence N 67 15 29 R iO4._c :eet to toe Trio Ri !C:rt of Eeginnf:.3• 10. Sal ion 17, To n.q: p 23 tixth, Rage 5 East 103.61 L.F. S3693.09 e Et,ginning at the intersection of the Northerly margin c'. Bronson Play North wItth the Masterly margin of Slate Highway iirt r 2; Thence N 22 44.1 E along tie highway 1179.91 feet to the True Begirnlnc; Therm continuing N 22 4;31 E 100 feet; Thee e N 67 15 29 It to the Ezeter i y mrg i n o; Pacific Coast Right of Irby; Thera -'utherly along said right of hey to e point N 67 15 29 W from the True Eag Ion leg; Theme S 67 15 29 E to ore Tni,e E3eylrring. LI; Lfts State Highway'. 11 IF1 L. •-W!a,r`<k ._ �`j `S• » ;���r fh"�Al7�XrJ+i�j fv1 ' #L�,y'�s a,,,i.. rY • " K et y ' a lvi r , ' 4 Vs x 'Y •"To F - , ORDINANCE NO. 3950 11. Section 17, Tanship 23 North, Range 5 East. 160.51 L.F. 33689.36 A portion of the Nxihnt quarter of the Northeast quarter as follows; Beglnnirg co the Westerly line of State Hoed tr aber 2, 1315.17 feet Northeasterly as measured ac g the blest I ine of said road fray the Intersection with the centerline of First Ave. tbrth produced N 81 02 40 E 284.57 feet from the intersection with the centerline cr Feilroad Ave.; Theme Northeasterly aloha the west line of said road 100 feet; Theme N 67 15 29 W to the Easterly line of Pacific Est Relined Right of Way. These Southwesterly along said Right of hay Line 100 feet ware cr !ess to a point beginning N 67 15 29'vl of Beginr:!rg; Theme S67 15 29 E toEeginnirg. Less State Highway. 12. Section 17, Toalshlp 23 Nor:h. lance 5 East. 170.00 I.F. $E243.25 5eginnirg at the Irrtersect:al of the South 'rsrgin cf Fourth Ave. ftr h with the .ti 1te1er i v rang In of State Highway Nitta- 2; Thence S 9 4'0 59 h along the highway 47.65 foci; Thence aiorg a curve t; t e ricrrf having a . radius of 722.64 feeat a distance of 164.70 feet; i� Thence S 22 44 31 l 67.65 feet; '` The1C,... t:67 15 29 k to the Eas'er I y rrarg In '• of Pacific CcJst Right of Fey; Thence ttrtherly along said Right of hay to a point S 89 37 58 W frar the Beginning.; Thence N 69 37 58 F to the Bs imirg,; • 1.ss Southwesterly ICt) fret thereof. Less State klgheey. ! Section 17, Tar..shtp 23 forth, Faroe 5 East. S0.00 LI. 34695.00 i A pc-t len of the Northwest µ,a-ter of the Northeast quarter. Beolnning at the Intersection of Railroad Ave. and 8racan ►key; .11rThence N 70 33 4)E 4fb feet; Thai N 22 44 40 E 784.69 feet to the True k • eg Point of EeginnIng; Thence cut inuirg N 22 44 40 113 feet; Pence S 67 15 2) E to the i ester l y uerg i n o; Fr Wary State Highway t srbtr 1; Tierce Scutt iy a!rg :ato wargIn to a point S 67 15 20 E c`. .ire True Port of Beginning; Theme t.67 '.5 2.•it to t:e True Point of �ya.r Burg lr•.I n3. Lars S`atu Fuel_. tj "x :ti• :-1 • •7 Y'Y!'^i7:7 :" x_ aF r ee•c*ramie• - (.;:*w 'A a+ - 1.:' air -S.71,r r•;?r`%fty„ ;t;r,.. �c,, . t " " 4 S. .r ?' P`-.1 r+ "#*' , ti t - :1) -c ro i : Y `,*k . Tx!Y yh�., -`?J v P psi 44.?, ;,,It'.' i '.42;',a ,l-f�m,l'7- i� ,t-?+-, '-.y_r i' ,--•4.. .T5 - : .as?� .-:J- .''� i;�.:-_.,c.. .;J?.: '. 111: N ,' ORDINANCE NO. 3930 • A. .:" 14, Section 17, Township 23 kith, Range 5 East. 230.40L.F. S12,000.i8 A portion of the fbrthu st qwa-ter of the fbrttrsast Tarter. Beginning at tie intersection of Railroad Ave. and 9ronsan hey; Thane N 70 33 40 E 408 feet to a point ai the Southeasterly line of State Hlghwray N hoer 2; Thence N 22 44 47 E, 897.69 feet to the True Point of Beginning; Thence S 67 15 20 E 300 feet; • Thence N 22 44 40 E 212 feet; T1uceN67 1523W300 feet; Thence S 22 44 40 W 212 to the True Point of Begirnirg. Less State Highnrey s 15. Section 17, Township 23 North, Page 5 East. 80.00 LI. $4174.16 A portion of tha ftrt!'uest quarter of the fbr-tteast quarter. Beginning at the Intersection of the ,-. centerline of Railroad Ave and Erotism Way North. In Car Watcs Addition; Ttrdl_N C 34 40 E 4e8 feet toe point on the Easter i y I ire of Sunset Hlgfway; r; Thenx N 7 '.E 40 E 1109.69 feet to he r i. True Point cf Bog!rnl,-g; s ,'. Theme ccrrinuirg N 22 44 40 E 80 feet; O There S 67 15 20 E tc the Westerly line of •.0 Pr imni State Hichwey Piste- 1; .? T`erae S7i..ths y a'7-ne raid Westerly line to a point S 0 i`_ 2J E of the True Foini of Beginning; Thane N 67 15 20 W to tie True Point of Beginning. 1... 16. Section i7, Township 23 North, Fage 5 East. :i�0.42 L.F. $1354.96 = A portion c4 the krtiuest quarter of the Ptrttneect quarter. .-,- &inning N 7ii 33 4)E 408 feet from the ti intersect i n of Rai I road Ave and Brrnsnn Way th; Theme na-tt,ly e!ag 're Easterly line of the State ad 1109.69 feet to:tie True .. Road of beginning; !'r, Thence S 67 15 20 E to the Westerly line of ,,, State Hlabtcy tLyter 1; Thence fertherIy ale, said highiey to a point S 80 15 20 E from a point en fhs Easier l y l 1 ne of Stale Red Rater 2, WO Is 100 feet Souttei iy of to ttxth line of the sUPdivislon; There t: 80 i 5 2U N to State Ibed Renter 2; r Thence San*terly eicrg said rood to the '. True Point cf Beginning. Less Sunh.rtterly 80 feet. TV= :J' e , y i ? J..• T , .- `9. k 4.Vc- :!.1`M ..t1: 400.1mFg- 1, 1 vKr,rat ! = c by k 'as•J.w �e ;3 ".*i , t � `s - . . n ,,y .rs � - . . .r' ib -R � -a•-'- tr tt;t �" k s1 fr „ -r . r,,7 ty _,p�c. .b:t? ` Zw - . �< s ta � •F. ., � ;*r4* . •C �. 4t., - st•til �' . w1 „r -� . .N + J y r�,K,a4: ' i.h- , PIK*. a� L i•c11e•i • •. • . , , , - ,*. • ... s . . , a 1111 • Ok01NA C E NO. 3950 I 17. Secilon 17, Township 25 hbrih, Range 5 East. 50.00 L.F. S2608.78 w A port ion of the ttstttest qwa t r described as follows: Beg inn i rg at the I nlersect l ar of Railroad Ave and Bronson Way girth In the plat of the Car htxlcs Addition; Thane N 70 33 40 E 408 feet to a point aw the Easterly rrergIn of the highway; Tixrce N 22 44 40 E along the easterly Ipi margin of said highway 1302.69 feet to a �!f point of curve; Thence ai curoe to the left a radius of 603.69 feet 136.97 feet to a point of Tom; -hence N 9 44 40 E 10.45 feet to the True Point of E+eginnlrg; Thal kx S 80 15 20 E i 20 feet; Ili Thence N 9 44 40 E 59.23 feet; Thence N 84 38 23 if 12).35 feet to the Easterly rtergin of highway; w___ The ce S 9 44 40 M a!ar, said Easterly warsin 50. feet io the True Point of `I Eau!nniry- Lebs State hia.waJ. [mom 1E. Section 17, Teenshlr 25 Nzr'h, range 5 Eait. 5C.03 L.F. 25C8.78 A portion of the ftrthe st quarter —11 detcr:,:ne as '.cl iaws: Eeginning at the hwter ectiar of Railroad Ave. and ftaucn May North In the plat of o0 the Car hort.s Addition; -Deice h 70 33 40 E 405 feet to a tclnt a tee '-&-.1 r i y :'Fret;in cf Surset Highway; r�} h N 22 44 40 E along Easterly margin J of the highway 1302.69 feet to a point of C'� c:rveture; 7 .o Theme an a csre to the left a radius of "-- 603.69 feet 136.97 feet to a point of ta,eit; Trace N 9 44 40 E 60.45 feet to the True Feint of 13rolrnlrg; 11 Thence S 84 38 23 E 12)35 feet; Theme N 9 44 40 E 59.20 feet to the hbrth line of the Section; Thence N 88 58 40 M along said section Ilne 121.40 feet to the Easterly margin of the n 12Ney; Thence S 9 44 40 M along said lrw9ir, 50 feet to the Point of Beginning. Lis State Highway. • ,:.J•��rzy .'' c'-;T '��' i 5� ••. f ,4c t} ,7..A tL. f 4.'4:7 •� •.. .._•. ,, ^vi$77 tar' %Zs, '-•. . ~ *St 1 7 •� �y,J.-s: i�� ' ti'=•�q, r• t' :, r3o.{i f7.� {�3. . -?,t �' :, i• * ,'.n- .` ,jr + �}- a•, 63 !.�f••'f'`'tf�3F� `- `W"(�i.• • ORDINANCE NO. 3950 ' 19. Section 8, Township 23 North, Raiye 5 Fast. 115.00 L.F. 56000.32 Eeginnirg al a F,oint 470.09 feet West of the S u#8ast corner of tie Southwest guar-ter of the Southeast quarter; Theme e N 11 03 40 W 168.29 feet; Tie N 60 05 40 W to the Easterly berg i n of State Wad Nutter 2; Theme Southerly alag said Bergin to the South line of the sibdivislon; There East 319 feet nrse or less to the Beginning. Less Pr livery Stale Highway Reber 1. Less the N rtFeasteriy 140 feet. 20. Section E, Township 23 North, Range 5 East. 115.00 L.F. 58087.54 The Northeasterly 140 feet of the following: 4 Eeginnirg 470.09 feet West of the rtutherst corner cf the Southeast giarta of the Sartteest q,a<ter; Tice N 11 03 40 M 1EE.29 feet; T encc t+60 05 40 W to the Easterly aerg in f State Road txats 2; Theme `utterly aiurg said'9!n to the South line of the Sidi;!s1on; Tnaer_ East 319 feet ra'e a las to the ✓_ Eeg Inning. Less Prirery State Highway rrtrber 1. r 21. S -t!cn 8, Tanshlp 23 tlrth, Range 5 East. 133.78 L.F. S6980.31 ;crt!cr of the Sartnuest qiarter of ttu Ec,:iteast quarter der lbed . tol lams: Feg i nn i rg at the Satteest corner; Thence N 89 Zb 47 W 470.09 feet; Ttrere N 11 03 40 W 168.29 feet to the Point of Beginning; Thence N 66 05 40 W 227.58 feet more a \ less to the Scutt»ster l y'erg in of State `-y Nlgtwey Nirber 2; .i, Thence►ortheaster l y a lag said cip Southeasterly aergln 117.60 feet; Theme S 48 57 50 E 1E0 feet; Thence S 11 03 40 E 74.22 feet more a• leis to the True Pbint of Beginning. 1111 Less State Highway together with Lot 15 Ble k 1 Mindsar HIIls Addition Correctiu Plat. Less State HIghwe:y. Y�e V t THIS SPACE PIOVIDCD FOR SICORDSA•. MI FILED FOR RECORD AT REQUEST OF Independent Escrow Inc. 108 Factory Avenue N., Suite 3 Renton, WA 98055 order No. 294245 AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO Name EMMA CUGINI Address 353 VUEMONT PL. NE. City,State,2ip RENTON, WA 98056 • Escrow No. 93553 - DEED OF TRUST (For Use in the State of Washington Only) THIS DEED OF TRUST made on January 3, 1994 ,between • JANET TSENG, A SINGLE PERSON, AS HER SEPARATE ESTATE AS NOMINEE FOR MING-LEI TSENG AND YEN CHIN-YIN TSENG, HUSBAND AND WIFE ,GRANTOR, whose address is 219 SUNSET BLVD. N., RELATOR, WA 98055 and CHICAGO TITLE 1800 COLUMBIA CENTER ,TRUSTEE, whose address is 701 FIFTH AVE., SEATTLE, NA 98104 and EMMA COSINI, A SINGLE PERSON, AS HER SEPARATE ESTATE ,BENEFICIARY, • • whose address is 353 VUEJ(ONT PL. NE., RENTON, WA 98056 , WITNESSETH: Grantor hereby bargains, sells and conveys to Trustee in Trust, with power of ale, the following described real property in King county, Waehingtonl N • SEE SCHEDULE -A- ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART OF BY REFERENCE. L' SUBJECT f0: SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A FART OF BY REFERENCE. 0 -CASH OUT DATE NOT TO HE EARLIER THAN THE END OF THE FIFTH YEAR OF THIS AGREEMENT UNLESS THE PARTIES AGREE TO AN EARLIER PAYOFF DATE. ' t ,A�sROVED IN FORM AND CONTENT BY: (. L , J v. , ,- 1 1i: which real property is not used principally for agricultural or farming purposes, together with ,all the tenements, hereditaments, and appurtenances now or hereafter therounto belonging or in • any wise appertaining, and the rents, issues and profits thereof. This deed is for the purpose of securing performance of each agreement of grantor herein contained, and payment of the sum of Ninety Two Thousand Dollars and NO/100 ($ 92,000.00) • with interest, in accordance with the terms of a promissory note of even date herewith payable ' tc Beneficiary or order, and made by Grantor, and all renewals, modifications and extensions thereof, and also such further sums as may be advanced or loaned by Beneficiary to Grantor, or any of their successors or assigns, together with interest thereon at such rate as shall be I agreed upon. 1 TO PROTECT THE SECURITY OF THIS DEED OF TRUST, GRANTOR COVENANTS AND AGREES: I. To keep the property in good condition and repair; to permit no waste thereof; to complete any building, structure or improv.a.nt being built or about to be built thereon, to restore prdaptly any building, etructure or improvement thereof which f may be damaged or destroyed; end to comply with all laws, ordinance., regulation*, covenant., cooditlooe and r.etrictioos affecting the property. 1. To pay before delinquent .11 lawful tam and open the property, to keep the property free and clear of all ctb.r I charge., liens or en0uahraeree impairing the eerurity of this Deed of Truet. l • I. To keep all buildings no.or hereafter erected on the property described herein continuously insured against loss by fire or i other hazards in ao amount not to lase than the total debt secured by this Deed of Trust. All policies shall be held by the 1 Beneficiary, and be in such eapaniee as the beneficiary may approve and have loss payable first to the S.oeficiary, as its interest may appear, and then to the Grantor. The amount collected under any Ineuranre policy may be applied upon any indebtedness hereby secured in such order as the beneficiary shall determine. Such application by the beneficiary ■h.11 not cause discontinuance of any proceedings to foreclose this Deed of Trust. 10 the event of for.clo.ur., all right* of the Grantor in LPD-22 00'OI Hd f00 SO1073tl 0803 OMIM Wd OO:IS:EO 002-S01016 v ire uranee policies then in force •he11 page to the purc haeer at the fared o.ure •ale. 4.To defend any action or proceeding purporting to affect the eecvrity hereof or the rights or powers of beneficiary or Trustee, end to pay all coati end exps..., including eoet of title"arch and attorney'• tee. in a reasonable amount, in any ouch action or proceeding, and in any cult brought by beneficiary to foreclose this Deed of Trust. 5. To posy all costs, fens and eapet.e. In connection with this Deed of Trust, including the expense• of the Trustee incurred in enforcing the obligation secured hereby and Trustee..and attorney'. tee. actually incurred, as provided by statute. a. fihould Grantor tail to pay when due any taws, lneurance premiums, lien., encumbrsneee or other charge. •gninet the property hereinabove described, beneficiary may pay the ease, and the amount en(mid, with interest at the rot. est forth in the note "cured hereby, shall be added to and become • pert of the debt ..curd in this Deed of Trust. IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED THAT: 1. In the event any portion of the property Le tenon or deaeged in en eminent doemin proceeding, the entire aaeunt of the ward or each portion" be nee oo.ary to fully satiety the obligation hereby, shall be Amid to beneficiary to be applied to said obligation. 2. Dy accepting wysent of any eves secured hereby after its due deter heneficiery de.. not we've its right to require prompt payment when due of all other some •o accused or to declare default for failure to so pay. ). The Trustee ena11 reconvey ell or any part of the property covered by this Deed of Trust to the person entitled thereto on written request of the Grantor and the beneficiery, or upon satisfaction of the obligation secured and written request tar reconveyancs cede by the Beneficiary or the person entitled thereto. a. Upon default by Grantor in the payment of any indebtedna.. . eur.d hereby or in the performance of any agreement contained herein, all sums secured hereby shell immediately become due and payable at the option of the beneficiary. In such went end upon written requeat of beneficiary, Trustee ehall sell the trust property, in accordance with the Deed of Trust Act of the State of Washington, at public auction to thn highest bidder. My Wean except True["may bid at True tee'. eels. Trustee shall apply the proceed* of the mole an follow., Ilt to the map.n.e of the eel., including a reasonable nable Trustee's Lee and attorney.. fee; (2) to the obligation eecurd by this Deed of Trust; (3I the surplus, if any, shall b.distributed to the p.ceeee entitled thereof. 5. Trustee 01411 deliver to the purchaser at the male Lt.deed, without.warranty, which shall convey to the p.roheeer the in con..t In the property, which Grantor had or had the power to convey at the time of hie•`eution of this Deed of Trust, end ▪ a. he may have acquired thereafter, Trustee..deed eh•11 recite the tents showing that the eel.was conducted in compliance with all the regal rea.nt. of low and of this Deed of Trust, which recital shall be prima feel. evidence of such compliance and conclusive evidence thereof in fever of bona fide pureha.ar and encumbrancer• for value. a. The power of ode conferred by this Deed of Trust end by the Deed of Trust Art of the state of Weehington is not an gods/wive remedy; b.o•ficery may c.e.• this Deed of Trust to be forecio.•d a. a eortgege. 7. In the event of the death, incapacity, disability or reeignetion of Trustee, Beneficiary asp Appoint in writing a cucce..or Cruetee, and upon the recording of each appointment In the mortgage records of the county in which [hie Deed of Trust 1. recorded, the eucc.aeor trustee shell be neeted with all power.of the original trustee.The trusts. i. not obligated to notify any party hereto of pending sale under any other Deed of Trust or of any action. or proceeding in which Greeter, Trustee er beneficiary shall be •party unlesa such action of proceeding is brought by the Trusts.. e. This Deed of Trust applies to inures to the benefit of, and le binding not only on the parties hereto, but on their heir., dense es., legot •daininetratora, ecutor• and as e iqn . The tare eeneflel.ry •hall soon th.holder end Owner of the not• encored hereby, whether or not need as Beneficiary herein. 0 JANET TSEHG // N LI O 1-4 0 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) • ) es. Q)COUNTY OF King on thin day personally appeared before me JANET TSEHG to be known to be the individual(s) described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowleged that SHE signed the same as HER free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. icALI /� ` 1J GIVEN under my hand and official seal on this 401 day of 71-47-�,` , II aaaatar.e lrett,r f t it 1,;. /1 4'! • f!, .,� Notary Public in and for tho state of Washington, residing at )�_ hLa 1K,fc[.' - .! NOTA'WY u —tom r2 My Appointment Expires 6"/9—t77 L U, PUBU- \ ♦.• ryryl '.e REQUEST FOR FULL RECONVEYANCE Do not record. To bo used only when note has been paid. TO: TRUSTEE. The undersigned is the legal owner and holder of the note and all other indebtedneoe secured by the within Deed of Trust. Said note, together with all other indebtedness secured by 4 said Deed of Trust, has been fully paid and satisfied; and you are hereby requested end directed, on payment to you of any sums owing to you under the terms of said Deed of Trust, to 4 cancel said note above mentioned, and all other evidences of indebtedness secured by said Deed of Trust delivered to you herewith, together with the said Deed of Trust, and to reconvey, without warranty, to the parties designated by the terms of said Deed of Trust, all the estate now held by you thereunder. Dated: 19 4E.a 1 - 0 �S � 6IJ • o 0 CHICAG O TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A1-.TA COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A Order No: 294245 Your No: CUGINI LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT A PORTION OF SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, WORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT MONUMENT AT INTERSECTION OF BRONSON WAY NORTH (A COUNTY ROAD), AND RAILROAD AVENUE IN THE PLAT OF CAR WORKS ADDITION TO RENTON; THENCE NORTH 81'02'40" EAST 85.18 FEET TO INTERSECTION OP CENTERLINE OF PACIFIC COAST COMPANY'S RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY; THENCE NORTH 49'50'40" EAST 372.81 FEET TO THE WESTERLY HARGINAL LINE OF STATE HIGHWAY NO. 2; THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE NORTH 22'42' EAST 200 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT 0P BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGINAL LINE 50 FEET; -g THENCE WORTH 67'18' WEST 133.75 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO A POINT 36 FEET MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES FROM THE CENTERLINE OF SAID RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY PARALLEL TO SAID RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY S0 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 67'18' EAST 133.75 FEET, HORS OR LESS, TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. tr Ili rJI 11N O • 4..L . I" I j. OIICAG01171L'INS URANCECOMPANY WLIAOW/III1i0/mC 0 EXHIBIT n" TO NOTE AND DEED OF TRUST DATED l-3-944 OPTIONAL PROVISION: Q. After maturity, or on default, this Note bears interest at the rate of 1E per cent per annum, until default has been cured. 46 tdl'ht 0 0-A:.Tr — �c n . • e SELLER INITIALS: OUTER �.i OPTIONAL PROVISION: 5_ LATE OVS. If any payment to the Note is not node within /a days of its due date. Maker agrees to pay a 1at�,charge equal to percent of the=rant of such payment, or G' S 50.cc) d D1SR.I'late paynent charge shall be in addition to all other ranedies available to Ibider and tit fi;sl ar uits received iron buyer alter such late charges are due shall be applied to the late charges. / SELLER INITIALS: WYCR yl0 e,Gr gri lte 1 • 0 id In OPTIONAL PROVISION: 6. BUYER TO PAY TAXES AND INSURANCE. Buyer shall pay taxes and insurance when due to the appropriate collecting agency and provide proof of same to seller. • SELLER INITIALS: OUTER • l' Page /• x. 1 n • •+u t�N 4/Z/i ;.N, _. S( IZo39 , ase . ..._ el _ • .4'� 1 ice• _ .. - �r ..a` , J ..`: i1/4 tee.,• •ip. _ il1F• `r::•:.: ,•••••••—•-". . •' ,...> \----\._,,•%..... r• I"4.. • 1 d •,• 0 , •-•1i• -- •• • y- a • 'v - y° ri e• 8 .Ls ti . p `y'. `'' ', t, I. ,( '� =if% I Rt h r,c ',Is, w. J,• ...• 4/, • i . A.f•.l,•. aoat KM / ' .... .. :: �•• y• I. r{ ram. 43. 1 I •/ '/1 sANwg,Ma n` �,.._ e!.: .-••• •I l,NhN1.:... • L1 I: .. y•• f5•15. t ' :': • MON MORUrwPR 401AID 0 MON MONUMENT SR e•NNT Ma'NTI•,l ovum •t.Dk LEVNIIT - NDT CS SPINS PC, 171.446.69 1611,MT 63 1350.11.E MON M 101AD MOM WAPITI ARE 111600 DOT PANNAR01 NM 6RK1 PT 171.650 11 1,{{i.p117 I553•1113 Na MONUMENT CASE AND 050 ALL COOIAINA • r1553.66 1 MD MOM RI CALCUUATED •A A E¢OND DRDER TRAV1Rft Et T/EEN {R11x1 POT ITS.667)1 I,M).K76. S Ip*D ams. Ni OM ANNDD CAS EM-1/meSNNNOTON ELM BLAME • MON RI bAD COOSOiI.7E STSTEM USW. SR100 PC. ITS.EE1 EI 1,M1,1N 21 }1l3 Mal Si 4RD 0E00►0 C. 179.140 M 1.1 5.1E1 S6 746611 0101T. SDR M "MD S1r0►T. 179.141 Li 1.41112.114 1/ 1+E710 PT 1N •7•i{• POT AIo. SR10D PC 1b.1E1 b i,M]!N>• I1.S:EA R .41.3E•SSI MON M ROAD 111100 PT. 160,52160 1,013.375 66 13.4641►T R - •11.66.E POT AND 111I100 POT 1b.5E11119 T1411.57340 1146 SS .� 00 lOA•+I•1C•A P 11E1.10311 ►M1,N713 006 Ni • 11.0 MON IN ROAD11 6 •22.6E 6 AND MON IN ROAD ' 0R700 PT.•A.P. 1411.1191 31 4,6N,tM S1 E1-13 11J•NkI 1c •PT - 1b.S101! 1.151317 N .I5.5' 11.71 55 BP /r5 IO 1b 4D •N•79 6 Alo Mors M 5y,6 R PC 110,472 45 1,E43,3111 71 111•53 P7``641 • .13.961 LID NON IN Rq,D 1►T. 100#00.SI 1.163.643.N H•1 1 iR •1}11.71 AND Npp 11 POND 111100 PC 142.049 53 1,/64.15101 13.3705 POT Ni •121•S73 PC A.E PEP. M ROAD RECORD OF SURVEY WASH INGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SR900 L RID SURVETOR OR CIVIL ENGINEER CERTIFICATION RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE Tins M c•rr•cNP re. • survey well• 1/ the DeP•rlei•nt .•'Troop ert•IIon • teer•rynoote wit% 16• re0uir•1.1Mr1 •r too Stare/ Recording Br. ,t ,19 •,_--__M +W 1+ {�� / �y `''•° '°' ' «° ""' "— JCT. SR169 TO JCT. SR405 I T•`T .` 3.1nte TLLlv'fy /rL/'•(�^ ----- — •. Sea of of sego fl the ••foes. of I L 5 orD'E R.g,1.•N•n N, Iyoe:_ _ SHEET 1 OF 2 SHEETS r J j i? _ �- Pis;,,t,N .1•414 TUT! 1NF lI[fMo5 --- i --23N.R.5E.W.M. ,s... ` \.., -of5//203900/ y1/�li•A i i' i-\-1 \ 10 _ - I • EIT y .1 .�y. O MON wr rorw�+R/'Kr 1 i :, •pMV.1aMT4 ME NOW MOT aLya+MDIN IL•7 1. i , . PP;• CAN a10 COVO ALL COOaDIMaTat afar CGLCML•IED \'_ IMO.• ec•OM Oapetl sTo.. *NW aa/11KM II8t "aTI r - •Viglr._ .4. +. 'll'.NC MIS rut atw#�gIwTOM *NW niwa a w.TS ...._ 7 ` . aR!aw MIIp - • T.II N,L I.,W M. �` - C . - - -- - Go)+.L.M4,Sac.1Z ...... f. • ammo— yyL7)t.1f UI`pl,f• a Y70f wI «40 i •,/, �T. •L1)1.71 yat1MN RM1 •IOI aROaD L.:_______ I a f to RC WOIM M 1•►7,t/7 ••M. K • x ,`a • ••M• MOM to MAO f • / aq atO 0 1aa1,M7K a NNW K 0 �, ••-•^Nn 1y .1' . MUSS. Mr Ic. 17R a)l.l IM).MS Oa D4 MOr IlifllgiD .yr ./ . M, w •)•f'7r = i'. e` ./ VOW r/aattcior I�s.we�a �wi. m1 a s 7 moo' «IaO l a „J./ «I STOUT 0wR)ac1lor Inwf. T.fat.w)pe ptorlsartirr a��aalILaota sr .•IOw so tOaD •• IM7, 7) 01••m1�. I MINI COT 11f•«.T e a"SWISS VD MOM.ow MAD 1 &I119** , NNW PT 179.ISMS ¶w1•O7317 , *w•TN131110 MOM.« RO.D �j i . )Y1O'Wit NI • I RECORD OF SURVEY WASH INGTON STATE • DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION • Lap 11a1vaVOa OS CIVIL 100111101 1w1070611100 RMCCOO WS aaT 1IICa1TI SR900 T•r rr♦ .«MSS •«t••.o • ww► a•. h IM. p.et.LT .t T emort•t1«I r trr«wtat• •�1�1'►t r•�Illr•I.M15 •1 1•t Wr.t1 Irr•rii.a ACT. +w Ci_,� . lo f•.rta. l� r. •M* .1— —N •••• .1 Me el JCT SR169 TO JCT. SR405 fry 1. « C a R.gat,•1b• M. .1y0lr 1 T""''�' layarlicocii SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS,'s r, **************************************************************** City of Renton WA Reprinted: 11/19/98 13 : 33 Receipt **************************************************************** Receipt Number: R9806857 Amount : 1, 505 . 76 11/19/98 13 : 33 Payment Method: CHECK Notation: #1007 TSENG Init : CRP Project # : LUA98-169 Type: LUA Land Use Actions Parcel No: 172305-9077 Site Address : 219 SUNSET BL N Total Fees : 1, 505 . 76 This Payment 1, 505 . 76 Total ALL Pmts : 1, 505 . 76 Balance: . 00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 000 . 345 . 81 . 00 . 0007 Environmental Review 500 . 00 000 . 345 . 81 . 00 . 0017 Site Plan Approval 1, 000 . 00 000 . 05 . 519 . 90 . 42 . 1 Postage 5 . 76 1 I., ,.. ' .. , , , / ",.,-..-',,,Y1.7,,..:....„'. :,,,,.. m, 1 ,, \\ • a t.,, la 7 \ 1A%; , qiii ,,, \., \„,,,.\wt ' " tu ` t,, „it lim \. , ,., :..,,,„:„ iv. . i ..,„..11 „ ,-,,,,,,,,,,,,„,,,,.:,,,, ,, .,, , 1 yik *go 0 14!\_ ( 7 , .. 4 . i,,. wiz 7 , 1,1_,_... n f' trio . r► �` ' .. . Ba Et-i , ///-17 ''' \ , 1 at au ifit- 1-1 ,, , , \ .. . ,. , i ii, , .7,7 0, ,-, 1 Nil \ 1.. , ..! if immi Iry n iimig / I'�+ii!>•)1\\' 'L7/ 'L1/ ' /U f r �4, r ,„ ill;' i ,,, , , , ,. .,, „... of t, .d _ ``----\, ‘ if y -r ....., __. It 1 %%Sp- . c: .:)—.. _ (I.) I %.) II: (t)-- .---..a) Ilik VP ' ' 'N, ,,,,t .......... i \ \Ili . 1 \ . „ ...._..._. . ....i .. , ..........=„. .„....„, .=, gori,t,f! ..40, : r 1 I it :" / 411; __::: 11.1 ifT, . ...i _i_Ti..___.: =--- . :.. ..._,j__—____ In.._ ,........t. / ______ g....., ''%1.1.>:'°°11°:\. 1 : Viiiii • ta 11*7.71 ,41: *: 1...( ..." r T /' + ... ri ,.._,_. _I. 10 1* , .. .... .... • ,_ 7._ 00,40,41 , _43,. la / . _ - PROJECT/I" 1 - .__1 2nd LOCATIONI J$4m 1-Le prig 4".4 -k--r\ - �•0/ i6 gi i 'N.... ---- i -----„," ,., _ _ .......„ 4,1%.,,, pc/ _.___.\\, , \ III i \\.... _ 11/4p)tif .... U : IIL1 . j—. E. la rnmimmen:.\*N''' , 1 gra Kr cu LEE & ASSOCIATES - EN TON I NN v: cINITY M Ai-) DESIGNED: DK DATE: 1/98 FILE NAME:TS-VIC DRAWN: JL/CAD CHECKED: aSCALE: 1"=200' FIELD BOOK: PACE: