Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
LUA99-137
l'illy_ S Vi 0 ____0 100_,../..7 ir ,"r- /6-°)__,. 1 J , 1:6bII,P i ',2'%/ i I ,.• 1 - 7/ 0 No , \ . m . r?.,, I 1 /, CI"pk S.-.eno �— / ', ///////,V//#V////i i,tff///7//,V///ZZ/f/////, /, Z NIll , 8 I:I i / i i 1 z eIXiv aKrrao wwnaE___ \\ \\ a 111 _ I I I ILaI,I «sroMN Nsra rw.ac �� ^` I PPP III i /r 1 I"• "� i E: E•,rc s-.az. I (�'i ii iiiii i/iiui iuiiu�v i 1 /nlA�i�i�nn.�iiiinniii�i�.6/iinQa d 1 / I ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ O I. i T� - 7JP • I. I = " �� 4 ❑ ❑ ❑ e ❑ d � 1 /CEMAI' 1 z I , l I z r J I I anar-� I I = ; i. I • .• n:i ,, Lwv H " a�Ow" I• .ru�.n II r w■cE""i°�E s_.eo I•;— I�_— IN391 IeellsalooE ,•rv(n aav"� .Jr.1IMN M- I ç!: r. Ec soma EL.71.1, w I , , I ,,, ..,„„,„.......,..,...„ f' E�.l I' (.I1C M-rr 06•22.111.0 OM MOM O.K.GA I. 1 ,��, , I I I �, = r 1 CB ( /E- A/ L."ncf-lcr,/' 71 I 1 1` I ", 111555"' s f I I ,e • �.a!1AREA DR. I .air¢-piir (s• N°1ir a•- —4 E_.Yx eo ♦• ei1_.e>�ao aror r l•er E rmr I 1 ie wa.a yD — . _mcw a me x ee a•. 29 " nf -.nr c r Cie(-.mr �c-.en. / - • E-.se.:, \J .w.o /T ra►E..nr II i I , �. AREA DRAM �' d' :r l � - c-.se.nBr7E 2 CB Oro �ss I 0 r src E..ar I op 1 , �I� c_ 'w, rx 3 a 'r I .. . A \L ___ i , _ , ff_.__-_ _ ,.... g s it 0 !.' a e ..----- :', EC„ard N. n • _ «am a d r u•WPM �r¢_.m°1�°•" n 142f1d AVENUE 8E • non n - rn n n n sMIDI IMSNI ' . •- WM MN 12. i ri• '••-.s.l ,a.V_ TEE r/OM w.c r rr ma•-.s�.o, a ouw aar re car.v.SAY MN q.0te• cwm(s-w.r r. ff- awd NW (rr ror s-.lr Ns/ COW N°N.n r' E.NY ■' CMG II COW•�It.• (l a/• 7Z. r l O/' :. �I In r rS-NC s-HE,' E.rr CLOD.Y.01.2. c fs• •....i• r It'MI f-.r.• (rr me s wxr FLI •4lrr EX arur•.ev ar¢n r r _,.M. L P EEE', ,''• g-•3� f.ray UTILITY PLAN/DRAINAGE CONTROL PLAN E PING•-ur-0• L II'COW f-.MA•O. r l CdG K-..r.0 L t;: f:NYU' •.y1.M RM WrQ.'LI UTILITY PLAN/DRAINAGE CONTROL PLAN SITE PLAN APPROVAL C4.0 DLR Group G / ` HAZEN HIGH SCHOOL RENOVATION AND AUDITORIUM ADDITION SUBMITALnm nrchi Blum Engineering Design e_ HAZEN HIGH SCHOOL PORTABLE CLASSROOMS 2004 1416141 /j I /- I PROJECT DATA -� _ PRS HAZETE NON GH SCHOOL n 1101 HOOUTAM AVENUE // / - NET glVO RENTON,WA 98059 /; /// / / - NE`� I FGAL DESCRIPTION /// ",.:I►�/�1�/ PROJECT SEE ATTACHED / / M _ / SITE PARGFL NIIMBFRS / / - SE 116TH ST 102305905] 102}0592]] / ASPHALT PAVEMENT __ REMOVE(E)ASPHALT 1023059012 1 ] _ / LANgNC 2E SLOPET i 2 PAVEMENT SIDEWALKS 1 B4 1023059292 k / / MAXIMUM EACH2' 2D I /f z 1023059201 5169]000]} 0 / • // 1 l SCOPE a WORK741 /r/ tt L �v—V Filia• ,t. N INSTALL(5 PORTABLE CLASSROOMSRAMPS. < <_ -- _ ( - '� g 6 SIDEWAL & ATED SITE&ELECTRICAL // / _ n xv MAP RELATED / / E A . H //'f �. R I`C I.. VICINITY W E IMPROVEMENTS \ 2 i�� / / n ' // TS SITE DATA U. '2a / / "' // • SITE AREA. 1,463.5]0 SF Z Z / / mac.." . ..= I// ® _t•.. (E)IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA. 595.811 SF -< DAa V. o -_ Imo(/..- IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA ADDED 3270 SF -I - `-emu -F�h-F'I PORTABLES 2688 SF `-I SD -- - i N' 38th AVENUE SE (DU VALL AVE.S.E.) _ RAMPS 432 SF W O. r 1 RAMPS Ip-- - -- I WALKS 150$F W y/ E / PORTABLES SEE AS - t,.'v 11- 20'SETBACK -I SURFAIMPERCE SA SURFACE AREA REMOVED 649 SF Z W I w / TOTAL PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS 598.432 SF W� PROPOSED L ACCESSIBLE PATH I SURFACE AREA 0 N I PARTIAL SITE PLAN I I I I I I I 1 I I I PARK NG$TA z • �T' SEE At 1lir ac ao 8 I I' ryl I I UREA.CONSTRUCT.TYPE PE DATA 2]9,]81 SN 1 I - USE: E/A21 I 1 PORTABLE DATA AREA (3)EA•896 SF=2688 SF -- -- TYPICAL PORTABLE DATA AREA. 896 SF MAX 20 SETBACK I HEIGHT 15 FT MAX R- I I CONSTRUCTION TYPE V-N O USE E INI A FIRE ALARM NO I FIRE SPRINKLER NO (n N I`• I I CONTACTS o 0 ......._. a ... • . 1 I RENER O=N 2 • I_ _ - •"_ �_~ RE20 NORTH 4NTON 0L 1H DISTRICT NO 403 0 J o ( NON,WA.98055 =U ,V - -Jr-` - -� "- -ty - - CONTACT BOB BROWN 4, - E \ -3 ! -- TELEPHONE.(425)204- 00 =J a I I) �-..- = 44 I ARCNIEFCT GO Ag �. -S r 1I I GR BOX 4ASS,AWAY ARCHITECTS W F �% FEDERAL WAY,WA 98063-4158 Q p w I I I CONTACT CALNN GASAWAY I d R II 1 II PR OSED L... / TELEPHONE: (253)941-4937 I + 1 -� P ABLES� jIQ IE I F. (253)941 5122 • • , 1 L EEH a �_ !tit ABBREVIATIONS II I I, 1 I GI 14 I (E) EXISTING ,{ } III FH FIRE HYDRANT r A. III IN GS t pi I P PORTABLE Wrt B I 1 I INDEX MN,z . I I I f II . T� `� M III.I Cl GENERAL INFORMATION,SITE PLANS W"'°^ I , '. '- 1 I AI FLOOR PLAN/NOTES 1 1. - 0 T A2 SECTION/NOTES I= t I, j- I I A4 DETAILSONS II A5 RAMP PLAN DETAILS I I • 1 M-I MECHANICAL PLAN W n m A. 1 E-1 ELECTRICAL PLAN etuf I.,00 'r< SA FOUNDATION PLAN/DETAILS/CALCULATION' 2 OVERALL SITE PLAN 8 Q.N I I II y HOOUTAM AVENUE E jIl e—e_s—o_ Yi, p, ii�l,,inii»iiiii n_ a,=WV" I it \ :!" -,:,,, o 0 • I ''''''.....) erc[J.war , I i O. 9 1 IDI `\ ' ,/////�10- ` <1, / 1 II %�_ rrrm cur<war , 11 , ; • , Iilri , 1 Q L10'AT er war , , • ,;,' , —] 1 �' Jll l 1 I I : j / - a CAM RN awar"" I % , r.•.<al cave, war • „,...„..,. 'r I 'I \t__,::=,,, 1 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑,/❑''" i I.' 1►/!i�nniAi,iiri niAllBini�i 35i II I II x I ''•I . I� ❑ ❑ ❑ G ❑ d ❑ % % 1 I ,I 1.I �� r I ao MA • II JJ...,r © I III I • — I r Wriest)"war w'_ I —— • .r v I • MC I w�s11[o11.G11001 I e I • . r..rr awwto now II il( ° ' .. ......,. If,MC S N.4•111. I OM N.: 1,W'1" • I _ • ... •. AR.041/441 it sf.AC t...Cr . . •1 a 1 : Ian i—riaiii: i ; • II I I Qamv �:nu• <r arr^nHI Il - ,��! [-.•• io [- ,I; _ r wm r�Ja«•. II 41 INN e Jr-u1.r I I r , w•o ''°° [-.xal • r re.c•r-i i wu w. � [ .nm N N•Illa „,,,, ‹..) Know ivillillit IlitA4044' YAW11, • , [ .xNTTIC 2 CC WO '•' ,-j I iret.•,L.._,4.1 y s•.1*irzstry I ' I . AMCOR • s , onsensir-*-- ter .. _—. ___ _________ - - .my _ afr Q arw a" "Am 4.41.110. Ile r" nw• , Q`a1w ry. ° etu•Wwq Q ap1 Nw " " • • " • Q WOO Mal "- er q..1 i u•"' i w:. r IS ox w..u.• (�y/a/•1�«/!<. ) m r/CM`AM ON i II me w.wlr�'�2fld AVENUE 8.E aro,, „ Q �, Ir µwan• r U CPC•..Y 1' [Il'our r..A.' <J•M Y wl, Q • a101 Nfv r v Mk r-MI.J' <<YY QQ�.«rI,� .YI p.J6Y• r N'Glt w-Wr <11.DI J-W.' r I.ICI M-Iwl.' Q aIW AY <11'aar Yeea I. r 1r-w.«IJ' <I/'a°IC'J waa' Q�,,.SUN a 1,me w wlr r u•me s.«ar r u'mr..axe• y umn• .ee n,r r1eLej_ 44 !a Nt, 111�. If Il MC•r..l[e• ?e l.c'i J1 1 f Q awl rw awc J_,e8• r UTILITY PLAN/DRAINAGE CONTROL PLAN 7 rsaa Rua w..r v/,s a A- , eaa LI DLR Group - UTILITY PLAN/DRAINAGE CONTROL PLAN SITE PLAN APPROVAL C4.0 Argescere Engineering Design --,/ HAZEN HIGH SCHOOL RENOVATION AND AUDITORIUM ADDITION SUBMITAL111.124410 �y E get E I d'I,:F. ,_'!'r' ::....i.i:_ „ �f$V i C °jc °' it la 4 11®;� +i ' s IMT1, AVL �_it k MALL AM. K6. -tE. I I 1. _ r Y • , ��,w _+`.�w':`.� '•suu.a•raoE �•fioew+rean - y- 1 l C _ M - q TkTaE ?..-:. may' ...__0 room. _�L. w • •, i t .8 r; L�[! Lkt a sy m I , l a {♦7 E- I - ems• • c„, i____L":_li, T. a� u m+ �-- , i ma, 1•A. 1+we „ 1N2N0.---vE='aSE" L:IOO1110.1'.=WE^6E2 �. 1+ 1i i YI �Ii. b 'P., E'' +� e il I ; g DI I+1 fi' L� _ •� P.L.1N_4..l)ta).Z0I : 44'. •_ [1. - E (I Ai! m I- m m m -< z v v r z 0 z - m m N 11 CO.1 Vicinity Map ^ I 11111 i rrrK DLR G p --- Hazen High School Renovation and Auditorium Addition •(r PrUrklt �Y1O-- r;eI aw. —aca.� r�a a , `t �r to i>iii fie — t�39rt !. 1]T� #! fi it +i me MI �F f ■ in 7Y:Ia�7��I i,®tLC 31. Nana; _�]. a ®mll:MK®."I7'7117 r:i�^"^® 1:7'7!7 `�.�.+1 �tl. r l i. I� ®'7u:1®® u•' I TTe:LP __ LBcu:7u^^r ^IrEg®�p3]�.Ir_ " n A. ,. ,s I. : uee _e �� - 'lliiui '' ; a..:A. _ .!II i MEN I�: ! <<' iltat IJfL11 . tr � i k µt I �®{�i© 71I sHJ7G1®I�. ysI� I _ iJL .L L_ ! M . � i !' n - �T I c — r _ 3Bl�MCI i 1 ri$II .I I I a .I Ei- :''�II'b. !H!�� ® _ 1 _ I , Ia . N. �_ � AR' NI' _ tY•:::.a.a• •Y.a.. k. S 1 I , i 1 1,--; ..,4.. i —€0 ,,..._ __,_ —.....,? — L=IT' 1_ 11 t ,-- EL£YAT/ONS A JE£T/Od/�:, .-1. ,yea 4 MEP RCM.ALL.31-7.010.107.063 Of MIK a IIIIIMEll - sec..om(Tort rr, m-._islm_i_.M.--iIi-=—.iI Mm..iM.n Rn.IMn.in.Mm,-EIIIlImIM=E = 0, 0 I m li,_111_ ,1' 1�1-111=i..1111■I 1■1 •, _...m�. Ai 0- —1-1 1.• --r,,.—,i2,r--'4.4, 0;,2.1.11-,_, TTE=.•-Ig.g=—.E-.:;1=._=.'--n_=-1,,—=.im_"p:.i ii-=_r.....=..•--_=•.1I1I._1_._=_._..—....._____-__-.j'z_41.,L1i • _ ._ .=I.II .I. . .—_1 i.....� .__ ,� ..g. ©'.. 0.. 00 0 402 -• —=== ,, ••,,��_ li n n_ . 1111 = A ; .- o ®South Elevation „ ®North Elevation 0 Mk 0 m , 0 , 1 0 „ v •� n o W o ®"'.� �"o 0-1• -o 0 o V ©'v VV w .. ; , v ;` �`. � �. o 0 ,3 a -.--.-1 7 IZE1 '0 CZ t -el. M=.. -0- --0- —® -0- ® 0- -0�-- -- 0 0, 0 • N 00 East Elevation c o O co n V al _c aa)) .7 !I1IIIIIIIIIIIIIlill@IIIIIII!IIIIIIIIIIhIII'lrIlII!IIIIIIIIIIIIIIfIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIP111Illgl'l l!IPIIIIIIIIIIPI(I1 C c _ _ a� z 1[1 I] lal arl an lana-D' 0 Ea_CI ,,,,,,,Az-_______ mil i i •' • I I 1 <•Ric I'�i,`e;61 Jr it ik.1 OM'M1== , , -0- 0 ._OO "' `0"' -0 0 0 0 . 0 East Elevation-Continued(Northern Portion) Partial North Elevation-Along O (3rtdlM 7 .t '''I'-'i ,I,. _ J.. fri in i o, J V Ew.__I °°•" 1522.111S1 °°•""• °•°• O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 tY i Door Types Relite Frames Storefront, Window, Louver Types 'J J SITE PLAN APPROVAL SUBMITTAL © 05' � - - o 9/24/99 v _,' v+ w' 0� ��rc!!;FR. /////////2,7TT/T/7//7// ,�;, //i/ i•q o j / „® R�)..:. / ///// MIME N arI .m.....o.. / 4 • ao• / / LEGEND .',;. Rn••' . 2°— / TOTAL SQUARE, FOOTAGE OF SITE 1,478,617 S.F./ 33.9 ACRES Q •� A 13- 10 ,� BUILDING/ FLOOR SQUARE•FOOTAGES 7 EXISTING'NORTHWEST S1JILDING 24,734 S.F. Q j EXISTING MAIN BUILDING— FIRST FLOOR 155,329 S.F. co j / PROPOSED-MAIN BUILDING— FIRST.FLOOR 9,412 S.F. O'L o % EXISTING MAIN BUILDING— SECOND FLOOR 68,977 S.F. J O j AUDITORIUM RENOVATION— FIRST FLOOR 19,500 S.F. c j I / AUDITORIUM RENOVATION—,SECOND FLOOR 1,829 S.F. -M0 Q AUDITORIUM RENOVATION- TOTAL 21,328 S.F. c w a TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF ALL FOOTPRINTS 208,975 S.F. a ;y A;, .!!w / ALLOWABLE BUILDING LOT COVERAGE 35% O 0 ACTUAL LOT COVERAGE 14% (p.r > C I _ / TOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACES 595,811 S F C j EXISTING TO REMAIN 558,806 S.F. Oa / PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS SURFACE 37,005 S.F. O— 9. / > O > LANDSCAPE L a) EKTYCL REV"Re* --DIROPCPC j -� ////////////////////////,////////////// SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING LANDSCAPING 36,100 S.F. O. V 0 OE eui�eRG*o MATCH EAST..'. lb, �� yy (n C ate• / \ / / PROPOSED INTERIOR PARKING LOT LANDSCAPING 24,465 S.F. — co 1... ��,� %} / PROPOSED PLAZA LANDSCAPING 17,975 S.F. O Co N • 6�'./4 .--v se. ���]�J TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE— PROPOSED LANDSCAPING 42,440 S.F. V =0 .i4�0i ti d _® 0 0 % N N o ,.e-. . ALLOWABLE BUILDING HEIGHT 30'—O' OR 2 STORIES (ZONE R8) N PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHT 38'-0" CO ca O � E, -� . 5_ ill .J Z IL / E'" j BUILDING SETBACKS REQUIRED BY CODE 20.-0" _ • " /�/TLH L/NF b,l'A E" yr ��T' °q,0°„� ✓ [ 1 SQUARE FOOTAGE OF WETLANDS N/A 6 , r•,,• '.�'.R,ei !" SQUARE FOOTAGE OF SLOPES GREATER THAN 40% N/A J ! 'i.0g % PARKING ANALYSIS ' ' 144.4) HAZEN HIGH S STALLS REQUIRED BY CODE 218 KM� o � FINISHED FLOU EXISTING PARKING STALLS— FULL 332 .41 � ELE✓AT/ON=472 EXISTING STALLS— ADA ACCESSIBLE 8 li B� � FULL PARKING STALLS— EXISTING AND PROPOSED 351 S�O�IA.E.. )aA / ADA ACCESSIBLE STALLS— EXISITNG AND PROPOSED 8 i��•'i� ,!i!:.i COMPACT STALLS— EXISTING AND PROPOSED 16 "' / //////////////////////// Al��;.; j TOTAL NUMER STALLS— EXISTING AND PROPOSED 375 �..... -- / j 40' BUS PARKING 10 Q wccateee*xu ..0 � - o / N/A C "u'e°°L°•"� A. STACKING SPACES FOR DRIVE—UP WINDOWS .w LAPEC.RC MEDIANS P•••' i py,�///i / L. ,•". I= Y, / /'1 CC J 0 61 SITE PLAN APPROVAL SUBMITTAL 0 �� 9/24/99 ®o / 7sj_ SC fM?fl /r/////////////rrr///r/r/r//////// / /7 /r///////Xlr/r//r///r///rr///////r///////r/r///rr -�-_ O EASTING PAWING STALLS � � 00 � � ; ® / a O I� % / 1EAST.ACCESSIBLE STALL p / H— ICOMMONS RENOVATION / W C L CO C / -IJ 't C HAZEN HIGH SCHOSL / 0 0 / �I F/N/SHED FLOOR / ° Z — / k' £LEVi T/ON=472.0' _/ =I „ C C / / d— a,iiiiiiiiiiiii o Q > 13 7T� I/ 1 •id a V CE to c ADMINISTRATIVE RENOVATION �y�y� t O1 I •;c♦� 0a. to •`i 4• •ii•♦vii•• 1 = NEW AUDITORIUM ADDITION 111111` +. .d♦• i.. / - Ai:Si:Kt:$♦♦. p•�•♦♦i;.,•.i...J 0-...4!O ®•4O OP,r�ir VAN'OW ••♦ ♦••••.♦•♦•♦ • .••••..♦ ♦/♦ s0•.•♦. •••♦• •♦••i ♦.•♦. o eve • �,1 111 oo,,.❖.r,A!:,.!Q4f .....*... ,i�•.••*,..♦♦. ••.♦♦„♦• ♦••♦•.♦>♦.p• :•.,♦••♦.0♦♦•i'♦♦♦♦•♦.w.♦ 4. _ -' �.m 41 47- ``� 4�4111 i,����"'�'/ �. PwS..•2%►.7 y rs� t[bK2:v►� 0-0:Gti:BEAROA:'<:: ..:�.-. .4At oAa-..:. ✓e.a o, � �. �4 .v 'lA. ° %�p% �2 �p .� •�• �. `�i per .� �, �i �p ie;`♦ wk p •\ 4 I' ' / by Av k••�4e J iS •♦ � • ♦ . 4 !► ,i / �9 ./OLE MO lrJtlYlK TO ADD STAR.AND VIIIIVIR IMMO.NOWSGU .OIDEWMfNODMO LOT. a- ADD Nd,aEa•wrr+a AtO MOW PLAYTIMES z•'AISLE ♦ >♦♦• „� erIZ98 mg �°Syr 7r' 7� N Attry.`."1 wne. ■ r:RAL PnwcN.x.ue ■ I ■ •�ii Oi �♦•�♦�♦���! all .■r,' �'' i♦♦♦ ♦•I ♦ . t I Epp .. ice' •i�'• Div ' ❖i s>•tiimisok > _ _ > ...♦♦♦� !4♦♦ ♦ e.�4 0♦^1•Oi•..•dor:N. :... :"ke •ei. v c.4 k•A R.,*• •►K .RS..% 6♦ •.. Ate, �, ��► ,1►- +914 ♦•i•i w>..ti..=.. ASSOCIATES _• !•. .♦• .•.•.w... , _ -� E2 /�..'!7.@0•dti,lr.:•:ew•V: bA,r�iNS4 AAG/7,R�,b'l.4sd+�M%�sati.v.:vv.,n_..psLO; r■AMD■bl>E.Cra l!Yl„ROM OUTGROWS. ..SOC.L RANT..ALatl,•3I0 AMA■K ._._____.I \ DORM aDNWLK YD al i _."CO _e_ ,Or__.-_-__._.-_-_____-.___ _-.-.-._.-.— __.- ___. ExISTWO S,DEWALK AND DUO TO RD..I . .--_ - O BCE DIOSWALE AND I EDI ADA RN.PS TO NARK.LOT A.0 ACCEM ORIK �- BCE. 4 2 n d AVENUE S.E. RANTING ALONG u20 AKNI GE ExISTNG ACCESS Suave NO CURDS TO 01'IAN cc 1 p G SITE PLAN APPROVAL SUBMITTAL © _� 9/24/99 SC!M?!! • —_—_ _— —.—._.__.--.._--__—_ _— —_— I O I i ; dl f O _ • 9. f f I RECYCLE r RR ' � y' / ':'//f/�f/f/U////f/�/ff/�/,/'/// i/. O ° co ENTRY DROPOFF D1ILDs.Te nATOH EAST..,1� 1 Q ff • U NACNUF4-�° io_•..E�i�� %%. : •j F 7 CN o 0 _ p..•c A, fn r .. ° o ° °�,_ +2�'a.J HAZEN HIG� (6 �— e c P"�i € i JI FINISHED ! 0 O ° I o ° i'.e� % W ELEl�A7/ON+ C C E I ° �' O :2:441 s oi i!'. I a V p 71—o 0 ° °—I—0 0 0 0— 10 PAl•CND STALLS X.r _--- I L 0 I I I La�rox.aEreETl.�eci.v+s i ,4a.....! ( o•— ai° wa c N2poII 1 j NEW AUDITORIU N O ° l// ///i/ co fC O ,�♦• .caawDlevn J = �'. z3.ITs' exuTlHo Tea•COURT OARS Sr REMA -•i� _Rimi ;3♦:♦: 6 i k` •• 1.4 ..• i 0 ''t V. I I -9.-- •a • —2 $+! �•�',��♦�•i;i..�.4 _'♦•i IOb�'. �, e IL 4 �'` IErA�,E Exl•TNG PARKING LOT.ADD NEW _ a i i y•♦t -- 1� ~',®®�♦`, ri ORzr ac awee.auwAuu AND MEDIAN PLANTINGS r • ,��a lia��4.v ei. ••,t'i� s♦•e�����-.���' ,?y t:1 AS KILL STALL..w AND MEDI STALLS ••♦ �' ♦^ryfii•♦s •1 A�L ` �i� S a�r 1-<ti 'Tv� • •�•♦e•♦•�o I `e�•j�� _ t'�NyOt •� e•+��.��-��`-1_I� A A.!• zr ♦i♦i' ••.••♦.•A ,'♦ 11� w— •9�♦p �•�°f♦.�i��y��s�� �.... .... ♦•q1•. •ii♦•AF•<`.1•'•'9. s s•cI- �y ♦ �---.4rOd���M �:t• 40, �•�•O• `y • • •• •.•.a-. Ow ••,...•.�_.ti �.w�A..w•Mw - O- G O -O— __ •.•.�?i!•�?•w�i��I%A♦i!•!i�ir.tiaO�•.-..e:•a� I �- IELCCAE EXISTING 1 190EtO�S N 19EANDEIlEY Di0aLLALE WTH IKVC' Q1tLIMrr11.5 = ACCEafLE Llllb RAMPS(T1T) LANDSCAPEDAREA AREA AND FOCAL rI.YeWa>!40.IASp Ave.!!E O EI _________________�. _ _—— IOVE EXDN TD.RICE -_____. . W E*� EMS..EVERGREEN TO I!I'IANT*r( r ADD ctam.Y SIDEWALK AND PLANTED °'A" 142ND AVE SE 142nd AVENUE 0 J J •; ; i',;"o, •; : 'k . '''' '1; ,, i,\,,., ; •- --- 1''''... --744C---' ,- '-',--.:1,:.:-,c-v L':.?-..,-,,,, /..fe-, - 'i,-4:1 SI•i. "... '„, •-.„..,\•'. •" '' C4 i _ ..A1 l'c.S,d., ri, , - 1 p ,: -.1...--.1 eg-.. 1-• V, ‘;‘, lib, = V ;.''•_..i'eI .• T....H 1L lt ' 1""4"-..474.-.,'"-:-•-'g--"1i, —\ I y ' i-.."'i .---- -- ,Af, ) --,-,r..= i • • 1,. 11 i,I.. =•11:*.,`— 4 . if ,, a 1 ,,,,,„! ,P •• I f ! 1 ip = •-r•-•: imtv,., ,r ° 4 • c 142,10=-WE- AL.- 1901.0. 11/E NE, /A, si . . ' 1 :,1 I I 1 , -.-1-‘• ;Alf. j...•:' ,)j ..—:ef• • i ;'' •; l' •••. .1 .44 4 I — i- - 1 Nb•idr6. 14:40:64 ° 1! 41'i-*I.i 7 .; -il ' _......111■11111 V9L.aV 9i /i—V7I PETERSON ROBERT D+ANNE L 769999 11041 142ND AVE SE RENTON WA 98056 032305-9174-06 BLACKSHAW DAVID 7N9999 11055 142ND AVE SE RENTON WA 98059 032305-9228-02 PEDERSON RACHAEL M 981952 2213 DUVALL AVE NE RENTON WA 98059 032305-9229-01 GESNER PHILLOP G C0176 11025 142ND SE RENTON WA 98055 102305-9002-05 KENNY MARTIN E SYLVIA 271913 18719 YEW WAY RO SNOHOMISH WA 98290 102305-9057-09 RENTON SCHOOL DIST 403 712777 435 MAIN AVE S RENTON WA 98055 102305-9072-00 RENTON SCHOOL DIST 403 712777 435 MAIN AVE S RENTON WA 98055 £VGJVJ-7Vf1-VJ RENTON SCHOOL DIST 403 712777 435 MAIN AVE S RENTON WA 98055 102305-9084-06 RENTON SCHOOL GIST 403 712777 435 MAIN AVE S RENTON WA 98055 102305-9099-09 MILLER RICHARD 319999 11228 142ND SE RENTON WA 98059 102305-9144-04 BROYLES WM E 11224 142ND AVE S E RENTON WA 98059 102305-9218-05 SCHWIESOW ROBERT+BAKER RINA569999 11246 142ND AVE SE RENTON WA 98059 COMMENTS Z44 q` i3 4 kit* ikile**i****Ard irf41ef#!riief�rie�le�r�rIrrkk■IrkIc�e�efI 032305-9054-01 NONIS GINO J 11038 142ND S E RENTON WA 98055 032305-9056-09 GESNER PHILLIP G C0979 11025 142NO AVE SE RENTON WA 98055 032305-9061-02 , CITY OF RENTON 869700 200 MILL AVE S RENTON WA 98055 u�c�u3-yua rut MARTIN DOUGLAS M+JOAN M 539999 11049 142ND AVE SE RENTON WA 98059 032305-9129-02 BERGESON CHARLOTTE J 929999 11027 142ND AVE SE RENTON WA 98059 032305-9146-01 MENDOZA RAFAEL F+MARY J 439999 14042 SE 112TH ST RENTON WA 98059 032305-9161-01 BLODGETT PATRICK A+CHERYL L159999 14218 SE 112TH ST RENTON WA 98056 1ULJU7-YLyL-U, RENTON SCHOOL GIST 403 712777 435 MAIN AVE S RENTON WA 98055 102305-9312-00 HAYES GORDON K 969999 803 341ST ST CT E ROY WA 98580 102305-9367-04 HILL JAY+NYSOCKI DORI A 509999 8418 S 112TH ST SEATTLE WA 98178 102305-9399-06 QUERIN VERDIE R 0N2371 23410 160TH AVE SE KENT WA 98042 516970-0073-03 RENTON SCHOOL DIST 403 712777 435 MAIN AVE S RENTON WA 98055 A p CITY _ F RENTON PlanningBuilding/PublicWorks Department Kathy Keolker-wheeler, Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator August 11,2005 Rick Stracke, Executive Director Facilities&Operations, Renton School District 1220 North 4th Street Renton,WA 98055 Subject: Site Plan Modification for Portable Classrooms at Hazen High School(LUA-99- 137,SA-A,V-B) Dear Mr. Stracke: The City of Renton has reviewed your request for a Site Plan Modification received July 21, 2005. The modification is requested for the placement of two 1,792 square foot double- classroom portable structures on the lawn area between the existing industrial arts building, classroom building,and gymnasium at Hazen High School at 1101 East Hoquiam Ave NE. The Site Plan regulations define minor adjustments or modifications to an approved site plan as changes which do not involve more than a 10% increase in area or scale of the development, which do not have a significantly greater impact on the environment and facilities, and which do not change the boundaries of the originally approved plan (RMC 4-9-200.H.). The revisions as proposed, appear to comply with the applicable development standards of the Residential—8 Dwelling Units per Acre(R-8) Zone. It has been determined that the revised proposed would not involve more than a 10%increase in area or scale of the development, and would not result in any significant environmental impacts above those analyzed under the previous development review. Therefore,the proposed modification to the site plan review is approved as a minor modification subject to the following condition: 1. The applicant shall provide a reduced(8%%"x 11") Photo-Mylar Transfer(PMT) of the modified site plan drawing to the Development Services Division prior to granting of the occupancy permits for the portables. This determination will be final unless a written appeal of the administrative determination is filed with the City's Hearing Examiner within 14 days of the date of this letter. See Section 4-8- 11 of the Renton Municipal Code for further information on the appeal process. Sincerely, • littfe°4te4M410—'fritrNeAt W Neil Watts, Development Services Director cc: Jennifer Henning,Principal Planner Project File: LUA99-137, SA-A,V-B 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 RENTON �� AHEAD OF THE CURVE :� This paper contains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer f11I ' BOND I� � Rk 11111• 00 Facilities & Operations Center %el - y17 Orl-iICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR vi.1 Telephone: (425) 204-4403 Fax: (425) 204-4476 403 July 18,2005 CITY OF RENTOI CEIVE RECEIVEr CITY OFRENTpN Jennifer Henning RECEIVED Principal Planner JUL 2 1 2uu Development Planning JUL 2 1 2005 City of Renton BUILDINGDIUISION BUILDING DIVISi0N, 1055 South Grady Way Renton,WA 98005 Project: Hazen High School Portable Classrooms 2005 Subject: Site Plan Modification—SEPA Lead Agency—SEPA Exempt Dear Jennifer: The Renton School District requests a modification of the approved site plan for Hazen High School,located at 1101 Hoquiam Avenue NE in Renton. The modification is for a change in the size,location and number of portable classrooms previously approved under a prior site plan modification. The proposed location of the portable classrooms is King County parcel number 102305-9278,within the larger 33.6 acre Hazen High School site. According to information received from City staff,the current site plan approval for Hazen High School was granted under Renton project number LUA99-137,SA-A,V-B,to allow the addition of a 650 seat auditorium and renovations of the commons and administrative areas. In 2004,a site plan modification was approved for three 896 square-foot portable classrooms on the lawn area between existing structures near the north end of the site. These portables were • not installed. A site plan modification was again requested and granted for the installation of two 896 square foot portable classroom structures on the northern parking lot. These portables also were not installed. Under the current site plan modification request,the Renton School District proposes to install two 1,792 square foot double-classroom portable structures on the lawn area between the existing industrial arts building,classroom building,and gymnasium. . The two double-classroom portable structures proposed under the current site plan modification have a combined area of 3,584 square feet. The increase in floor area represents less than 10 percent of the existing floor area of 296,217 square feet. The proposal will also result in fewer than five portable classroom structures on the site following the proposed improvements. Therefore,we understand that the proposal is eligible for a site plan modification rather than the full site plan process and does not require a conditional use permit. 1220 North 4th Street, Renton,Washington 98055 • r RECEIVED JUL 21 200 Jennifer Henning,Principal Planner,City of Renton BU'`O' D IviSot Page 2 July 18,2005 The Hazen High School site is zoned R-8,except for one parcel adjacent to 138th Avenue SE,which is zoned RM-N. The portable classrooms are proposed to be located in the R-8 portion of the site. Installation of the proposed portable classrooms will add 4,047 square feet of net new impervious surface. Building coverage will remain less than 13 percent. The portable classrooms will maintain a minimum 20 foot setback from all site boundaries. Associated site work will include the removal of about 180 feet of existing sidewalk,and the installation of ramps,landings,and electrical improvements. No other changes are proposed to the site design,existing structures,or utilities. Existing parking on-site totals 375 spaces. The proposal will not reduce existing parking supply. Section 4-4-080F.10.10.e of the Renton Municipal Code requires a minimum of one space per employee plus one space for each ten students enrolled. Hazen High School has a staff of about 88 employees and a student enrollment of about 1,200. According to the Code standard,208 parking spaces are required. Parking supply exceeds the code requirement by about 80 percent. The Renton School District is acting as lead agency for SEPA review of this proposal,as provided by the Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 197-11-926. The WAC grants authority to subdivisions of the state,including school districts,to assume lead agency status for projects implemented by the district. In accordance with the requirements of State statute,the Renton School District has adopted policies and procedures governing the SEPA process for District projects. The District's SEPA Procedures and Policies document is available upon request. Based on information in the project file,the lead agency has determined that the proposal to install two portable classrooms and ancillary facilities at Hazen High School is exempt from SEPA review. The Renton School District has adopted the categorical exemptions under WAC 197-11-800,which exempts school buildings of under 4,000 square feet of gross floor area and less than 100 cubic yards of excavation. The combined area of the portable classrooms and total excavation quantities are under these thresholds. The proposed site plan is enclosed. If you require additional information to process this application or have questions or comments on the categorical exemption under SEPA,please contact Owen Dennison of AHBL,Inc.,at(206) 267-2425. Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely, gig oehilia4., Rick Stracke Executive Director Facilities &Operations Enclosure: Proposed Hazen High School site plan C Calvin Gasaway,Greene-Gasaway Architects,PLLC Owen Dennison,AHBL,Inc. .► CITY F RENTON Planning/Building/PublicWorks Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor March 22, 2004 Rick Stracke, Executive Director Facilities and Operations Center Renton School District 1220 North 4th Street Renton, WA 98055 SUBJECT: HAZEN HIGH SCHOOL REQUEST FOR MINOR MODIFICATION TO APPROVED SITE PLAN (FILE NO. LUA-99-137, SA-A, V-B) Dear Mr. Stracke, - I am in receipt of your letter and attachments of March 3, 2004 wherein you request revisions to the approved Site Plan for Hazen High School. As your letter discloses, three 896 square foot portable classrooms are proposed to be installed on the Hazen High campus. The requested revisions are summarized below: 1) Three 896 square foot portable classrooms would be installed in the north/central portion of the campus. 2) Approximately 570 square feet of existing asphalt walkway and an 80 square foot tool shed would be removed. Renton Municipal Code Section 4-9-2001, allows minor adjustments to an approved site plan, provided: 1. The adjustment does not involve more than a ten percent (10%) increase in area or scale of the development in the approved site plan; or 2. The adjustment does not have a significantly greater impact on the environmental and facilities than the approved plan; or 3. The adjustment does not change the boundaries of the originally approved plan. Analysis of Request The site plan modifications requested and as shown in your March 3, 2004 submittals have been compared to the Site Plan as approved by the Development Services Division Director on November March 22, 2000. The new portable structures are proposed to be located in a grass lawn area on the north/central portion of the High School campus. Structures P-1 and P-2 are proposed to be located north of an existing accessible pathway, and P-3 the south of the path. The portables would be abutting existing school buildings located to the west and east, and a surface parking lot on the north. The existing school buildings would effectively screen views to the portables as seen from the east, south and west. 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 RENTON �� AHEAD OF THE CURVE • This paper contains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer March 22, 2004 • Page 2 The project site is zoned R-8, and all applicable setback and lot coverage standards would be met. Based on staff's analysis, I have determined the proposed revisions (Nos. 1 and 2 above) are within the parameters defined by Renton Municipal Code. Therefore, the proposed modifications to the site plan are approved subject to the following condition: 1. The applicant shall provide a reduced (8 1/2 x 11") Photo-Mylar Transfer (PMT) of the modified site plan drawing to the Development Services Division, prior to granting of the occupancy permits for the portables. This determination will be final unless a written appeal of this administrative determination —accompanied by the required $75.00 filing fee — is filed with the City's Hearing Examiner within 14 days of the date of this decision. Should you have any questions regarding this determination or the requirements discussed in this letter, please contact Jennifer Henning, Principal Planner, at (425) 430- 7286 s6 Sincerely, y. /t/16) "6. I" • : Neil Watts, Director Development Services Division cc: Jennifer Henning Jason Jordan LUA-99-137,SA-A,V-B • H:\Division.s\Develop.ser\Dev&plan.ing\JTH\Correspondence\hazen site plan modification.doc\cor • vr0441b• c.Noot Facilities & Operations Center . n` THEOF"FICEOFV � � y EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR '"Ium'', l. Telephone: (425) 204-4403 Fax: (425) 204-4476 403 March 3, 2004 G�t Retittorq MAR WI Jennifer Henning RECEIVED Principal Planner Development Planning City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton,WA 98005 Project: Hazen High School Portable Classrooms 2004 Subject: Site Plan Modification—SEPA Lead Agency—SEPA Exempt Dear Jennifer: The Renton School District requests a minor modification to the approved site plan for Hazen High School,located at 1101 Hoquiam Avenue NE in Renton. The modification is to allow the installation of three 896 square foot portable classrooms on King County parcel numbers 102305-9278 and 102305-9072. The proposed improvements are intended to increase capacity and decrease classroom size. The current approved site plan for the Hazen High School site was granted under Renton project number LUA-99-137, SA-A,V-B. The site plan approval allowed the addition of a 650 seat auditorium and renovations of the commons and administrative areas. Forty-three parking spaces were also added under that application for a current total of 375. The 33.6 acre site is zoned R-8,except for one parcel adjacent to 138th Avenue SE,which is zoned RM-N. The portable classrooms are proposed to be located in the R-8 portion of the site. Existing structures cover about 14 percent of the site. The three proposed portable classrooms total 2,688 square feet. This will result in a building coverage of about 14.5 percent,under the 35 percent maximum in the R-8 Zone. With the removal of 570 square feet of existing asphalt walkway and an 80 square foot tool shed,the project will add about 2,621 square feet of net new impervious surface over the approved site plan. The portable classrooms will maintain a minimum 20 foot setback from all site boundaries. Associated site work will include installation of ramps, connecting walkways and electrical improvements. No other changes to the site design,existing structures, utilities,access ways, or parking are proposed. 1220 North 4th Street, Renton,Washington 98055 Jennifer Henning,Principal Planner Page 2 March 3,2004 The classroom structures will be screened by existing buildings from the east, south,and west. From the residential area to the north,the classrooms will be partially screened by buildings and existing vegetation and will be over 200 feet from the property line. The Renton School District is acting as lead agency for SEPA review of this proposal,as provided by the Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 197-11-926. The WAC grants authority to subdivisions of the state,including school districts,to assume lead agency status for projects implemented by the district. In accordance with the requirements of State statute,the Renton School District has adopted policies and procedures governing the SEPA process for District projects. The District's SEPA Procedures and Policies document is available upon request. Based on information in the project file and after consultation with City staff,the lead agency has determined that the proposal to install three portable classrooms and ancillary facilities at Hazen High School is exempt from SEPA review. The Renton School District has adopted the categorical exemptions under WAC 197-11-800,which exempts school buildings of under 4,000 square feet of gross floor area. The combined area of the portable classrooms is under this threshold. The existing approved site plan and the modified site plan are enclosed. If you require additional information to process this application or have questions or comments on the categorical exemption under SEPA,please contact Owen Dennison of AHBL,Inc., at(206) 267-2425. Thank you for your assistance. erely, ck Stracke Executive Director Facilities&Operations Enclosures 1. Site Plan sheets approved under LUA-99-137, SA-A,V-B 2. Proposed Hazen High School site plan C. Bob Brown,Renton School District Calvin Gasaway,Greene-Gasaway Architects,PLLC Owen Dennison,AHBL,Inc. April 13, 2000 Ms. Lisa Johnson DLR Group 900 Fourth Avenue, Suite 700 Seattle, WA 98164 SUBJECT: Hazen High School Renovation/Addition Project No. LUA-99-137,SA-A,V-B Dear Ms. Johnson: This letter is to inform you that the appeal period has ended for the Administrative Site Approval for the above-referenced project. No appeals were filed. This decision is final and application for the appropriately required permits may proceed. The applicant must comply with all Site Plan Conditions of Approval. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at(425)430-7270. For the Environmental Review Committee, 7 Lesley Nishihira Project Manager cc: Renton School District No. 403/Owners FINAL .. lir& CITY F RENTON t>.u. Planning/Building/Public Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator Jesse Tanner,Mayor March 24, 2000 Ms. Lisa K. Johnson,AIA DLR Group 900 4th Avenue, Suite 700 Seattle,WA 98164-1006 SUBJECT: PARKING MODIFICATION REQUEST- HAZEN HIGH SCHOOL/FILE NO.LUA-99-137,SA-A Dear Ms.Johnson: We have received the attached request for modification of the Parking and Loading Ordinance for the above referenced project. Our evaluation and decision follow: Summary of Request The Renton School District has submitted a parking modification request (attached) from section 4-4-080F10e of the City's Parking Regulations. The request is to provide 157 • spaces more than the maximum number of on-site parking spaces permitted by code. Section 4-4-080Fd allows the Administrator to grant modifications from the parking standards for individual cases provided that the modification meets the following criteria (pursuant to RMC 4-9-250D2): a. Will meet the objectives and safety, function, appearance, environmental protection and maintainability intended by the Code requirements, based upon sound engineering judgment; and b. Will not be injurious to other property(s) in the vicinity; and c. Conform to the intent and purpose of the Code; and d. Can be shown to be justified and required for the use and situation intended; and e. Will not create adverse impacts to the other property(ies) in the vicinity. Background The applicant, the Renton School District, has requested a modification from the City's Parking Regulations in order to exceed the maximum number of on-site parking spaces permitted by code. The School District is proposing renovations to Hazen High School, including the addition of a new 21,329 square foot auditorium. The project also includes the reconfiguration of parking areas, which would result in an increased amount of on- site parking. Document2\cor 1055.South Grady Way Renton,Washington 98055 ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer March 24, 2000 Page 2 Currently, a total of 340 parking spaces exist on the subject site. The proposal would create 19 standard stalls and 16 compact stalls —for a net total of 35 new parking stalls. This would result in a revised total of 375 parking spaces for the property. Section 4-4-080F of the parking regulations requires the provision of a specified number of parking spaces based on the amount of square footage dedicated to specific uses. For the subject senior high school, the following parking ratio is applicable: • one parking space for each employee, plus one space for every 10 students enrolled. RMC section 4-4-080F10 states, "in determining parking requirements, when a single number of parking spaces is required by this Code, then that number of spaces is to be interpreted as the general number of parking spaces required, representing both the minimum and the maximum number of spaces to be provided for that land use". Based on this requirement and the ratio listed above, exactly 218 spaces are required for the site. The proposal to provide 375 spaces would have 157 more parking spaces than the amount permitted by code. In addition to the subject parking modification request, the proposal requires Administrative Site Plan Approval. The approval of the site plan will be contingent upon the approval of the parking modification request. Analysis a.) Will meet the objectives and safety,function, appearance,environmental protection and maintainability intended by the Code requirements, based upon sound engineering judgment. Even without the proposed additional stalls, the high school facility currently exceeds the amount of parking permitted by code. The number specified in the code is a singular number; a range is not provided. (For example, office uses are allowed a minimum and a maximum number of parking spaces per code. Such a range allows specific office uses to provide the appropriate number of spaces within that range to accommodate the needs of that particular use.) Properties are required to provide the minimum parking required for that use, but are not allowed to exceed this number without a modification from the parking regulations. The applicant contends that the current needs of the facility, in addition to the demands generated by the auditorium addition, require parking to be located closer to the new student entrance. No increase in trips to the site are anticipated, only a change in the location where parking would occur on site. As a result, the reconfiguration of the parking areas would create 35 more parking spaces than that which currently exists. Furthermore, all aisle dimensions, stall dimensions, pedestrian walkways, and landscape buffers would satisfy minimum code requirements. The approval of the parking modification would allow for the provision of additional parking spaces necessary for the safety, function, appearance, environmental protection and maintainability of the Renton School District's use of the property. The additional spaces are essential for the provision of sufficient off-street parking to meets the needs of the site and will, therefore, meet the objectives intended by the code requirements. Document2\cor March 24, 2000 Page 3 b.) Will not be injurious to other property(s) in the vicinity. The applicant would like to utilize space currently dedicated to parking areas in a more space efficient manner. There are no other potential uses for these portions of the site other than landscaping, asphalt paving, or to remain as is with existing parking. The additional parking spaces requested would not add any new impervious surface to the site and would not create any impacts to traffic flow or circulation. In addition, the applicant has utilized existing curb cuts in designing safe ingress and egress ways on the site. Street improvements would also be required along the project side of Hoquiam Avenue NE (west side). The provision of additional stalls may alleviate current conflicts over off-site parking during peak events by providing adequate parking for the school's use of the property. Therefore, the approval of the parking modification would not be injurious to other properties in the vicinity. c.) Conform to the intent and purpose of the Code. The parking provided on the subject site is intended to serve a multitude of uses at the facility, which occur at varying times of the day. The applicant contends that the parking ratio established by current regulations does not provide an adequate amount based on the present needs of the facility. For this specific use, the proposal to create additional parking in excess of the maximum permitted by code addresses the intent of the regulations. Therefore, the approval of the modification would conform to the intent and purpose of the current parking code. d.) Can be shown to be justified and required for the use and situation intended. Currently, the existing parking situation for the site often creates an overflow-parking situation that adversely impacts adjacent properties and rights-of-way. By providing additional parking spaces, the applicant is not only alleviating the current problem, but is also addressing the intent and purpose of the parking ordinance—to provide sufficient parking for the Renton School District's use of the site. The approval of the modification can be considered justified and required for the use and situation intended, especially when considering only existing parking areas and curb cuts would be utilized. e.) Will not create adverse impacts to other property(ies) in the vicinity. There would not be an adverse impact to surrounding properties by creating additional parking stalls where parking areas currently exist. The provision of additional stalls may serve to alleviate current conflicts over off-site parking during peak events and would not adversely impact other properties in the vicinity. Document2\cor March 24, 2000 Page 4 Decision The attached Hazen High School parking modification request is hereby approved. The approval of the modification will allow the applicant to provide a greater amount of on- site parking for the facility than the maximum number currently permitted by code. Appeals of the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 pm (two weeks from date of decision) April 7, 2000. If no appeals are filed by this date, the action will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Hearing Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. Sincerely, /6/1' /qe1 1a& Gregg Zi mkr an Administrator Planning/Building/Public Works Department cc: Mike Torgerson,Renton School District Jennifer Henning Lesley Nishihira DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITYOF RENTON MAR 2 7 2000 RECEI\'r Document2\cor ® DLR Group 900 Fourth Avenue, Suite 700 July 26, 1999 Seattle, WA 98164-1006 tel 206/461-6000 City of Renton fax 206/461-6049 Development Services Division seattle@dlrgroup.com 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Attn: Lesley Nishihira 425-430-7270 Project Name: Hazen High School Renovation and Auditorium Addition CL UY OFREN.�N'� 1101 Hoquiam Ave. NE, Renton WA 98059 SEP 3 () 1999 DLR Project#: 73-99-137-00 �+ Request for parking modification: RECEIVED Existing parking spaces—full- 332 spaces Existing stalls ADA accessible-8 Full Parking stalls existing and proposed-351 ADA accessible stalls-existing and proposed-8 Compact stalls-existing and proposed-16 Total number of stalls-375 The allowable spaces, mimimum and maximum per the zoning code is 218. As evident by the survey and the proposed site/landscape plans-the spaces included in this proposed count are located at various areas throughout the site. Much of the increase in parking spaces has been a result of restriping the southernmost lot by the tennis courts and the southern lot directly adjacent to the main building to reflect 90 degree parking versus angled parking,which provides additional spaces. Due to relocation of a student entrance through the addition of the auditorium and the remodeled Commons, these restriped spaces are providing spaces closer to the new entrance for daytime use,and to the auditorium for after school and evening performance functions. There is not anticipated to be an increase in number of trips to the site, but rather a change in the locations on site where parking will occur. The southern lot will provide a lot for students, freeing space for visitors in front of the main entrance. In the evening, this lot will provide parking adjacent to the auditorium. We feel that the proposal will: A) meet the objectives, safety, function, appearance, environmental protection and maintainability intended by the Code requirements. Aisle dimensions are maintained, and pedestrian access and landscape buffers are in excess of the code and provide a safe and well designed environment throughout each portion of the proposed development. B) Each separate area has been designed for safe entrance and exiting of the site, utilizing existing curb cuts so as not to impact adjacent properties in the vicinity. Street improvements will be added to the district side of the street, allowing for increased safety for the neighbors, while not infringing upon their property. C) The parking on the Hazen site serves a multitude of uses that occur at varying times of the day. The parking provided adjacent to the auditorium is intended to serve the requirements per the intent and the purpose of the code. D) By adding the auditorium addition necessitates that additional parking be provided immediately adjacent to it. Since existing parking areas were utilized to achieve this, we feel that this is justified and required for the intended use. The auditorium and school activities are nonconcurrent uses. Seattle Appleton Colorado Springs Denver Des Moines Farmington Honolulu Kansas City Milwaukee Minneapolis Omaha Overland Park Philadelphia Phoenix Pierre Portland Sioux Falls Tampa LTR.07 1 999parking modification.doc DLR Group E) Due to this reuse of existing parking areas and curb cuts, we feel that this addition will not create adverse impacts to other properties in the vicinity. Its convenient location to the areas in which it serves may in fact alleviate some of the conflict of on-street parking that might have been faced without this parking on site. Please contact us if you have any additional questions. Sincerely, DLR Group Lisa K.Johnson , IA Associate in the Firm cc: File LKJ/ctt DLR Group Seattle,Washington tel 206/461-6000 fax 206/461/6049 SITE PLAN APPROVAL SUBMITTAL Cv - �/ 9/24/99 ® 'C 10 0 10 .0 • 0 DO.. RECYCLE PAH.IIV,MOT n MOLD..TO MAT. xn.w\ 65 © 0o 00c0 lc -NIf :.N. o 1I = c Q\R4� -- a i . • o ° rR O O i" � `=f� HAZEN HIGY I > c 0 o p p` a a e- 'p er JIB FINISHED I 4 o m E�o CD co 4 II It x. I I E0 c ° O 'I 0 0-0° 0 °---0-- O• 1� eM�eLl iriLL o I I o ro Lro[c..e.eouru [y . ••• Ali: 'int OP o I I 1:I0I NEW AUDITORIU c i p o pasSs• o —o _p s •:J;i'c 141.4.... .-- I ��tiS`.1i�ia�. H;, ` ` TE1.444 CC.,Ole :::; • 1 '. I ' 1 ' • '' 'I •1 ' 1 .I . . I Wi! " .N,••••••.. MINIMIIIIfty,"4"NViVo"Nip 41144t: ��'---•T-3o ..:14(e: �..•.. NI r,riot.di�_r- 4 % 4, • J OW.AV!■xe\r n•..cw LOT,.DO Ten • _,..IiIHNIMMIlwitiff♦ {' �•� :.' [ CUTN.MOVR.Lxe.TOTV.. PLxxl. . :1;4131 �l:. , ,��'�+�wii��"�': usn++&wcEE. Lyy tl TyLI e�.LLe.Y CRrICI eTlLle S1 `� lAq., pSt` .p� ijkay 'v` SwOBIASP.- T/ 1.--- �/ '4. I04 0O w'-- ,gyp '',t`\ '�11,M• 1 , RJR...rw..... IX I v� 440 y[�{ � �•{.z•-o y�yylCg�s ;g /Z; ladA.A.► Or k`, , RELOCATE CortiTiO A. 1444•001e H nE.0[1.b WO...Ins ROCK MK1'W » CURD KCEEL! .0 MfM Me, LYpEGMED RRI[. YO.004 ILATITRNye 40,+6,.YO Ave.». U W Ev iREEx TO 4'un,rv�� ..DO O/Ei.S.e�DIWTLK L� E,44, .HD E14LANTEO TlO'"' 142ND AVE 5E I 142nd AVENUE 0 1 - - - - - - - - -—T SITE PLAN APPROVAL SUBMITTAL / � . .. 0 9/24/99 40 _ ,, , SCAtf M at, M a.w+�w 2 )0 1 1 LEGEND •)" ).. / j • TOTAL SQUARE.FOOTAGE OF SITL 1,478,617 S.F/ 33.'9 ACRES Q a le 'Y BUILDING/• FLOOR SQUARE'FOOTAGES ' W Q EXISTING NORTHWEST BUILDING 24,734 S.F. t ;�. ;�. m E r EXISTING MAIN BUILDING- FIRST FLOOR 155,329 S.F. PROPOSED'MAIN BUILDING- FIRST .FLOOR 9,412 S.F. .....1 •Q --�-- EXISTING MAIN BUILDING- SECOND FLOOR 68.977 S F. -- AUDITORIUM RENOVATION- FIRST FLOOR 19.500 S F. C j - AUDITORIUM RENOVATION- SECOND FLOOR 1.829 S.F. . < AUDITORIUM RENOVATION- TOTAL 21,328 S.F. CO --- TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF ALL FOOTPRINTS 208,975 S.F. N CO C 0 to��� 06; ALLOWABLE BUILDING LOT COVERAGE 35% m 0 ACTUAL LOT COVERAGE 14% lC le m I o TOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACES 595.81 I S.F O C C EXISTING TO REMAIN 558,806 S.F. E CC C • PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS SURFACE 37•00', ;F. ; m DIM,per, r LANDSCAPE a z p �sc.ca.•.rein rwm.wo.rt .,.i - i'i'.i - ''-/."' ' '•l -✓, SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING LANDSCAPING 36,100 S.F. E c c ;o. ! PROPOSED INTERIOR PARKING LOT LANDSCAPING 24,465 S.F. r-_ 0000 00 PROPUSED PLAZA LANDSCAPING 1 7,975 S.F. t.I.V ;% i TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE- PROPOSED LANDSCAPING 4',440 S.F. 0 _ 51ti9' % ALLOWABLE BUILDING HEIGHT 30'-0" OR 2 STORIES (ZONE PS'' C PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHT 38•-0" my- .. BUILDING SETBACKS REQUIRED BY CODE 20'-0•' — — ---A — E• _ �— �j`-,. _ N/TLN LWF L.'? _ . ,,. ,24"" "n,.o c 1 SQUARE FOOTAGE OF WETLANDS N/A E s, SQUARE FOOTAGE OF SLOPES GREATER THAN 40% N/A J ! •OI►�ej°ric•' PARKING ANALYSIS •''� STALLS REQUIRED BY CODE ='18 �i� Li►.ac�1 HAZEN HIGH S ,.' FINISHED FLOA EXISTING PARKING STALLS- FULL 332 Su,�eUc�cb £LE✓ATION=47e EXISTING STALLS- ADA ACCESSIBLE 8AssociArss FULL PARKING STALLS- EXISTING AND PROPOSED 351- .�R .. ADA ACCESSIBLE STALLS- EXISITNG AND PROPOSED ` Ci COMPACT STALLS- EXISTING AND PROPOSED I ;;;• .i,i.i: oR ; TOTAL NUMER STALLS- EXISTING AND PROPOSED 375 a 40' BUS PARKING I0 w•.wc.c.).�uu..« -� . el.OM,. STACKING SPACES FOR DRIVE-UP WINDOWS N,'A L 1 a SITE PLAN APPROVAL SUBMITTAL 0 jam ) 9/24/99 ® 7L • I / // // � i/ 7J � i / / �// /, .'/J ; —;I— D 0 0 0 0 • Ii J/ / I co D 000 00 I li) II E b Q II w a Q / I b - v —; M COMMONS RENOVATION. < ) v I O O Iv 't c �I ,• HAZEN HIGH SCHOC L D j FINISHED FLOOR Z 4 \ I C Q)C CD O a) a Eal I E o , , -------if. • •.• . . . .. ,:. -, . ,.. . .. �. • r O` 8 Q ,i/i / % ��i d — ; '� U II E cn ii1IIIIIIII •• ADMMNSTRATIVE RENOVATION , ti�„ '� r .rs ' AI�h a ll • • • • s'\ = o J,. -NEW AUDITORIUM ADDITION lI11 o:•.•,;,...•O i .a, •,��,•r.0.. ....Y.. '':. .•r.- ••s - .,,; #. ., �,♦ ...i.� •y �t'�:� v� C 1"11'1��II al:4 i iY,O••?j.:•,••4!,!••e••`•,••i•�.4..1.•:�•iR •i••••••;f:• 1,4•i•i i�•„4•••••,I,•i•••••• paa•401 i0•%0,•.• ,,•••iD•••••'�. -0 G) c e„► ■ / ' ` ,�1,,,' ate.•. •••••4.1.••!•!!�!•!•�QO, •••w•AO C!lw;!i!i .'•!•��i!•S�.d.:tdf; it.,1`G.•�!•,.►Q•1 t� l,•:\•k.❖!0:•4'r.�1a i 0;•.!•!•l y.._... C N p �iV'P o•. ,, ,����'',y��'���''`ia'� �1.:►Y v'. LJ�AZLJ/ —EL;/w\L ,w�/ ww nec..o wn.� '°— r Ie-sN tiNW •%Ir� S fit �i il/ / 1 ��I V�I f■M�i■ I I■� i11� 11100T1 nN1' Oss•..iy►dl!" ro•a♦x:•yr:+tM;.dt;x;•c9%Kuloccoc Oaa..►rog 0.isi•u i►41NC.MA•••.eo.v.!' 1 Li I .19,04,. ili n, N ,,` �' ,�111t�rf :f 9�,,,�,,���.''/' N. aMK.ro la iAixnw..woG ern, \ ADO M•owe•.W!SALMI AND MOAT RMRNas 31 Ka � :•�j,' =ft♦�IKIP„44�, �N. 4� —. Am.?..., D e. ■ St wu.awc.G aruu ■ ■ i!ii,• •ti��Sl��If•f♦I�����!���' �' •�i4 �.•i•i� iii .. I I �1 ' : .l• s••0.-.a !..tea r ^ �'' ' •p :�i•.. :� • �a i%•.Q SuswBLACX& t���•S 14.IMOO�••NC'NV:"!•� glib. y�� , / •44!•:� W' aep hid y� +�`>�7! ASSOCIATES �•4•..♦ '.'•• .m1 i i Afs r•►i•��•iii0� 10(�. ;•O .... d�i .. . .. tail... .. . .. ►�.�_.. '.. v. '�•O •_•'S fe ..Yia��KSP iWP�•ZA:�< �••: Am... 'ire .IEW X.e/NiA ;I_ NV ii0 •�•• . ••�••••••.: •. .•..••.;•••�..•.li< _ .•.aa•:�.►•a��•K.❖.•.�o.•,.�+••:! F.; •vr;.y.�•„ ..•. .w • ter ✓ ,` _\�� WPM 1 o SWOOP*WWI lal°�■eac aneserr.■ Q cy{ SO roc?,a.MI•w•yp■we0•.■'•■K l0M°0G KX10. APO o i_ ._.._•_._•_•_•Wes'Tos+or._._._.—. .—. I `[PIONS MDIVYIK..a GUI!TO leo,.W .D•.A..•♦O PAPP G LOi uD AUL.Dle,,. V lXilrO!W W VL!APO 4lDurl /xi•i.G ACCW PeK.10 QI.D.TO wtn•IN 142nd AVENUE S.E. � .�ti� K. IY J I I. C0!2Ctlirt.FIENCE DATE 3->0.00 NAME INMAL/ m 2 ,fV/41-1/NIWA /.A/n.i/3•X) CITY OF RENTON MV1NG do'I 171.ZZ Planning/Building/Public Works MEMORANDUM H A-r6oni 904 2? az DATE: March 20, 2000 TO: Gregg Zimmerman, Administrator FROM: Lesley Nishihira,Associate Planner(x7270)Vt'' SUBJECT: Parking Modification Request— Hazen High School/File No. LUA-99-137,SA-A Summary of Request The Renton School District has submitted a parking modification request(attached)from section 4-4-080F10e of the City's Parking Regulations. The request is to provide 157 spaces more than the maximum number of on-site parking spaces permitted by code. Section 4-4-080Fd allows the Administrator to grant modifications from the parking standards for individual cases provided that the modification meets the following criteria (pursuant to RMC 4-9- 250D2): a. Will meet the objectives and safety, function, appearance, environmental protection and maintainability intended by the Code requirements, based upon sound engineering judgment; and b. Will not be injurious to other property(s) in the vicinity; and c. Conform to the intent and purpose of the Code; and d. Can be shown to be justified and required for the use and situation intended; and e. Will not create adverse impacts to other property(ies) in the vicinity. Background The applicant, the Renton School District, has requested a modification from the City's Parking Regulations in order to exceed the maximum number of on-site parking spaces permitted by code. The School District is proposing renovations to Hazen High School, including the addition of a new 21,329 square foot auditorium. The project also includes the reconfiguration of parking areas, which would result in an increased amount of on-site parking. Currently, a total of 340 parking spaces exist on the subject site. The proposal would create 19 standard stalls and 16 compact stalls—for a net total of 35 new parking stalls. This would result in a revised total of 375 parking spaces for the property. Section 4-4-080F of the parking regulations requires the provision of a specified number of parking spaces based on the amount of square footage dedicated to specific uses. For the subject senior high school, the following parking ratio is applicable: • one parking space for each employee, plus one space for every 10 students enrolled. RMC section 4-4-080F10 states, "in determining parking requirements,when a single number of parking spaces is required by this Code, then that number of spaces is to be interpreted as the general number of parking spaces required, representing both the minimum and the maximum number of spaces to be provided for that land use". Based on this requirement and the ratio listed above, exactly 218 spaces are required for the site. The proposal to provide 375 spaces would have 157 more parking spaces than the amount permitted by code. \\CENTRAL\SYS2\DEPTS\PBPW\DIVISION.S\DEVELOP.SER\DEV&PLAN.ING\PROJECTS\99- 137.In\pkgmod.doc CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works MEMORANDUM DATE: March 20, 2000 TO: Gregg Zimmerman, Administrator FROM: Lesley Nishihira, Associate Planner(x7270) .`q' SUBJECT: Parking Modification Request— Hazen High School/File No. LUA-99-137, SA-A Summary of Request The Renton School District has submitted a parking modification request (attached)from section 4-4-080F10e of the City's Parking Regulations. The request is to provide 157 spaces more than the maximum number of on-site parking spaces permitted by code. Section 4-4-080Fd allows the Administrator to grant modifications from the parking standards for individual cases provided that the modification meets the following criteria (pursuant to RMC 4-9- 250D2): a. Will meet the objectives and safety, function, appearance, environmental protection and maintainability intended by the Code requirements, based upon sound engineering judgment; and b. Will not be injurious to other property(s) in the vicinity; and c. Conform to the intent and purpose of the Code; and d. Can be shown to be justified and required for the use and situation intended; and e. Will not create adverse impacts to other property(ies) in the vicinity. Background The applicant, the Renton School District, has requested a modification from the City's Parking Regulations in order to exceed the maximum number of on-site parking spaces permitted by code. The School District is proposing renovations to Hazen High School, including the addition of a new 21,329 square foot auditorium. The project also includes the reconfiguration of parking areas, which would result in an increased amount of on-site parking. Currently, a total of 340 parking spaces exist on the subject site. The proposal would create 19 standard stalls and 16 compact stalls—for a net total of 35 new parking stalls. This would result in a revised total of 375 parking spaces for the property. Section 4-4-080F of the parking regulations requires the provision of a specified number of parking spaces based on the amount of square footage dedicated to specific uses. For the subject senior high school, the following parking ratio is applicable: • one parking space for each employee, plus one space for every 10 students enrolled. RMC section 4-4-080F10 states, "in determining parking requirements, when a single number of parking spaces is required by this Code, then that number of spaces is to be interpreted as the general number of parking spaces required, representing both the minimum and the maximum number of spaces to be provided for that land use". Based on this requirement and the ratio listed above, exactly 218 spaces are required for the site. The proposal to provide 375 spaces would have 157 more parking spaces than the amount permitted by code. \\CENTRAL\SYS2\DEPTS\PBPW\DIVISI ON.S\DEVELOP.SER\DEV&PLAN.I NG\PROJ ECTS\99- 137.In\pkgmod.doc In addition to the subject parking modification request, the proposal requires Administrative Site Plan Approval. The approval of the site plan will be contingent upon the approval of the parking modification request. Analysis a.) Will meet the objectives and safety,function, appearance, environmental protection and maintainability intended by the Code requirements, based upon sound engineering judgment. Even without the proposed additional stalls, the high school facility currently exceeds the amount of parking permitted by code. The number specified in the code is a singular number; a range is not provided. (For example, office uses are allowed a minimum and a maximum number of parking spaces per code. Such a range allows specific office uses to provide the appropriate number of spaces within that range to accommodate the needs of that particular use.) Properties are required to provide the minimum parking required for that use, but are not allowed to exceed this number without a modification from the parking regulations. The applicant contends that the current needs of the facility, in addition to the demands generated by the auditorium addition, require parking to be located closer to the new student entrance. No increase in trips to the site are anticipated, only a change in the location where parking would occur on site. As a result, the reconfiguration of the parking areas would create 35 more parking spaces than that which currently exists. Furthermore, all aisle dimensions, stall dimensions, pedestrian walkways, and landscape buffers would satisfy minimum code requirements. The approval of the parking modification would allow for the provision of additional parking spaces necessary for the safety, function, appearance, environmental protection and maintainability of the Renton School District's use of the property. The additional spaces are essential for the provision of sufficient off-street parking to meets the needs of the site and will, therefore, meet the objectives intended by the code requirements. b.) Will not be injurious to other property(s) in the vicinity. The applicant would like to utilize space currently dedicated to parking areas in a more space efficient manner. There are no other potential uses for these portions of the site other than landscaping, asphalt paving, or to remain as is with existing parking. The additional parking spaces requested would not add any new impervious surface to the site and would not create any impacts to traffic flow or circulation. In addition, the applicant has utilized existing curb cuts in designing safe ingress and egress ways on the site. Street improvements would also be required along the project side of Hoquiam Avenue NE (west side). The provision of additional stalls may alleviate current conflicts over off-site parking during peak events by providing adequate parking for the school's use of the property. Therefore, the approval of the parking modification would not be injurious to other properties in the vicinity. c.) Conform to the intent and purpose of the Code. The parking provided on the subject site is intended to serve a multitude of uses at the facility, which occur at varying times of the day. The applicant contends that the parking ratio established by current regulations does not provide an adequate amount based on the present needs of the facility. For this specific use, the proposal to create additional parking in excess of the maximum permitted by code addresses the intent of the regulations. Therefore, the approval of the modification would conform to the intent and purpose of the current parking code. \\CENTRAL\SYS2\DEPTS\PBPW\DIVISI ON.S\DEVELOP.SER\DEV&PLAN.I NG\PROJ ECTS\99- 137.In\pkgmod.doc d.) Can be shown to be justified and required for the use and situation intended. Currently, the existing parking situation for the site often creates an overflow-parking situation that adversely impacts adjacent properties and rights-of-way. By providing additional parking spaces, the applicant is not only alleviating the current problem, but is also addressing the intent and purpose of the parking ordinance—to provide sufficient parking for the Renton School District's use of the site. The approval of the modification can be considered justified and required for the use and situation intended, especially when considering only existing parking areas and curb cuts would be utilized. e.) Will not create adverse impacts to other property(ies) in the vicinity. There would not be an adverse impact to surrounding properties by creating additional parking stalls where parking areas currently exist. The provision of additional stalls may serve to alleviate current conflicts over off-site parking during peak events and would not adversely impact other properties in the vicinity. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the Hazen High School parking modification request. The approval of the modification would allow the applicant to provide a greater amount of on-site parking for the facility than the maximum number currently permitted by code. Appeals of the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 pm (two weeks from date of decision) . If no appeals are filed by this date, the action will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Hearing Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)430-6510. cc: Mike Torgerson, Renton School District Jennifer Henning Lesley Nishihira H:\DIVISION.S\DEVELOP.SER\DEV&PLAN.I NG\PROJECTS\99-137.In\pkgmod.doc • LDLR Group 900 Fourth Avenue, Suite 700 July 26, 1999 Seattle,WA 98164-1006 tel 206/461-6000 City of Renton fax 206/461-6049 Development Services Division seattle@dlrgroup.com 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Attn: Lesley Nishihira 425-430-7270 Project Name: Hazen High School Renovation and Auditorium Addition -VELOPMENT PLANNIn 1101 Hoquiam Ave. NE, Renton WA 98059 CITY OF RENTON DLR Project#: 73 99-137-00 SEp 3 4 1999 Request for parking modification: RECEIVED Existing parking spaces—full- 332 spaces Existing stalls ADA accessible-8 Full Parking stalls existing and proposed-351 ADA accessible stalls-existing and proposed-8 Compact stalls-existing and proposed-16 Total number of stalls-375 The allowable spaces, mimimum and maximum per the zoning code is 218. As evident by the survey and the proposed site/landscape plans-the spaces included in this proposed count are located at various areas throughout the site. Much of the increase in parking spaces has been a result of restriping the southernmost lot by the tennis courts and the southern lot directly adjacent to the main building to reflect 90 degree parking versus angled parking, which provides additional spaces. Due to relocation of a student entrance through the addition of the auditorium and the remodeled Commons, these restriped spaces are providing spaces closer to the new entrance for daytime use, and to the auditorium for after school and evening performance functions. There is not anticipated to be an increase in number of trips to the site, but rather a change in the locations on site where parking will occur. The southern lot will provide a lot for students, freeing space for visitors in front of the main entrance. In the evening, this lot will provide parking adjacent to the auditorium. We feel that the proposal will: A) meet the objectives, safety, function, appearance, environmental protection and maintainability intended by the Code requirements. Aisle dimensions are maintained, and pedestrian access and landscape buffers are in excess of the code and provide a safe and well designed environment throughout each portion of the proposed development. B) Each separate area has been designed for safe entrance and exiting of the site, utilizing existing curb cuts so as not to impact adjacent properties in the vicinity. Street improvements will be added to the district side of the street, allowing for increased safety for the neighbors, while not infringing upon their property. C) The parking on the Hazen site serves a multitude of uses that occur at varying times of the day. The parking provided adjacent to the auditorium is intended to serve the requirements per the intent and the purpose of the code. D) By adding the auditorium addition necessitates that additional parking be provided immediately adjacent to it. Since existing parking areas were utilized to achieve this, we feel that this is justified and required for the intended use. The auditorium and school activities are nonconcurrent uses. Seattle Appleton Colorado Springs Denver Des Moines Farmington Honolulu Kansas City Milwaukee Minneapolis Omaha Overland Park Philadelphia Phoenix Pierre Portland Sioux Falls Tampa LTR.071999parking modification.doc DLR Group E) Due to this reuse of existing parking areas and curb cuts, we feel that this addition will not create adverse impacts to other properties in the vicinity. Its convenient location to the areas in which it serves may in fact alleviate some of the conflict of on-street parking that might have been faced without this parking on site. Please contact us if you have any additional questions. Sincerely, DLR Group 001%' (1‘."*".------411 Lisa K.Johnson , IA Associate in the Firm cc: File LKJ/ctt DLR Group Seattle,Washington tel 206/461-6000 fax 206/461/6049 �-lv SITE PLAN APPROVAL SUBMITTAL 0 << 9/24/99 ® L i. JO 0 Jn .0 awn.'owoom• ° ° �v r 0 o eu4o..a To Rea txHTW,u 4I. O isc ' L,) . • • °o I I II I 1 . ar O o �0/tikil J . ' Q1 •„ — 4.23 ,l ' p _. u,,,;,,�-'� NATCM— " — -- o *d P E > " HAZEN HIGI 1 O rC $".4. I II0 I Do-,______ �4:4 A`i2 _ • . . - 4 Q . • • . _ i ,_._ . 0.U O OI 1 — O--_—p_ I A I °I ° o *TALL 0 I ANJ .1oK..tKW.rti WIP 4 b ___ 4..,� • '" I NEW AUDITORIU o C u —I= —p AU1A 33 15' [x,3T.0 Tpµ>CGVI.T aR. V :fir: .e + ' 114- '6,445/0.%'4 i r,.--cit--..--.- 4,- Ap:.%-,. :di gigKP.vt[xHT[r rMC.G LOT,.OD KY - T , ..._._ +===�',;,` `. ti CORM.>"D[YYLK.A•,MOW.R.....1> t �1' .!r�ieA/ y �' `�`J9�.:,�f�-. $T:ux[ a RILL STALL*.r corrrcT a.Lu `! �`•`J riff �. ����.=� -S` Is s o&AC[5 ,,--2.• : ,r M.!rI%�. s o!.�`:�i!I �I%t 1 y i • f f: a- o a o— •A" - AM W a d KLCC.I x HA1410ltNAA e.1oc5.r.W..Y[uT•+ROM ancno."w t .CC[N�M.[awe141In,rro, LJ^,..--[0 K no.0C.L n.o•cbs MX.*1,1.0 Ave..Y. MM."[xHT.p 1w+311 �/ e_T, K.+INK TO K.,a .IV> a +TY'1 .00 a. oLrK .00.01"011014,0111 I42ND AvE SE I 142nd AVENU11 p 1 ��� - - SITE PLAN APPROVAL SUBMITTAL 0 - - - 9/24/99 0 ��� � r ! • LEGEND �•.♦ b I c .).. ..1m. (`M ,° z 0 TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF SITE 1,478,517 S.F./ 33.9 ACRES •1 *- . otE 2' !NI BUILDING� FLOOR, SQUARE•FOOTAGES Q , EXISTING NORTHWEST BUILDING ' ' 24,734 S.F. c 20._- 7o. C .. : r EXISTING MAIN BUILDING- FIRST FLOOR 155,329 S.F. I PROPOSED'MAIN BUILDING- FIRST..FLOOR 9,412 S.F. J C !, EXISTING MAIN BUILDING- SECOND FLOOR 68,977 S.F. .r AUDITORIUM RENOVATION- FIRST FLOOR 19,500 S.F. C j AUDITORIUM RENOVATION- SECOND FLOOR 1,829 S.F. -€< i AUDITORIUM RENOVATION- TOTAL 21,328 S.F. d 0 TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF ALL FOOTPRINTS 208,975 S.F.o y W �,,� m IS�9t o . ALLOWABLE BUILDING LOT COVERAGE 35% sy..a/ ..... ACTUAL LOT COVERAGE 14% o -- c Sgc TOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACES 595,81I S.F. I EXISTING TO REMAIN 558,806 S.F. PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS SURFACE 37,005 S.F. >—0 Q r LANDSCAPE t w).*oirro. 36,100 S.F. a C> lCYCL.rAKO MOH NWT -- t. ✓, SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING LANDSCAPING E fn C o auLow To...*u e.uT.o . '_ Ll : a ❑ ❑ O � j PROPOSED INTERIOR PARKING LOT LANDSCAPING 24,465 S.F. 41 . b0000 ® o L0 t 'A'S> PROPOSED PLAZA LANDSCAPING 17.975 S.F. H ^Y`('jPat At, 0 0 2 TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE- PROPOSED LANDSCAPING 42,440 S.F. _) ° 11 %/./�;,- /.%•i/:i ALLOWABLE BUILDING HEIGHT 30•-0•• OR -' STORIES (Zi ENE RBI C m u JI` - - PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHT 38'-0'• =S Q.••,„-- - BUILDING SETBACKS REQUIRED BY CODE 20•-0•• e _ _ 4/TLN toil L-D _ Tw, _. T IV_ ,.”„ L�1 SQUARE FOOTAGE OF WETLANDS N/A e N. ' ,, .0.' SQUARE FOOTAGE OF SLOPES GREATER THAN 40% N/A J l 0 ---- - I.,N..4i •.; PARKING ANALYSIS �•� �iy0.:44) HAZEN HIGH S STALLS REQUIRED BY CODE 218 ,651 FINISHED FLOG EXISTING PARKING STALLS- FULL 332 ✓.rh,,. K ELE✓,CTION=47e EXISTING STALLS- ADA ACCESSIBLE 8 tc FULL PARKING STALLS- EXISTING AND PROPOSED 351 • ADA ACCESSIBLE STALLS- EXISITNG AND PROPOSED ■►. COMPACT STALLS- EXISTING AND PROPOSED 166 i'" "i ''/ /'" ./.�� TOTAL NUMER STALLS- EXISTING AND PROPOSED 11 375 a} + `�� i 40' BUS PARKING 10 d to rYRH6.TALL. ��� f .ccewLUTALL ra:11__ __ STACKING SPACES FOR DRIVE-UP WINDOWS N/A .To LrpCM reom..e - . . . oI . . - J �,rmco SITE PLAN APPROVAL 51_,IUMITTAL 0 .�-s 9/24/J9 ® . Yef!w/al M ww...-.R 1 /•/./.'////////////;//,A/•//,' Q 2I i/./ ' ,. / /„/////9 /' ,Y7/0 O O ,„ , p Co - , I 10 D 0 0 0 00 i � ; .•!,•TNr t1 Y7 3 1; 4b II p •DQ //i//// //// ///////////// liy :^/.�/i////i/".*//. - C H b —; I" COMMONS RENOVATION. t ) 1 O O c �I ® �/ I , liI T. r HAZEN HIGH SCHOOL '. • FINISHED FLOOR Q Z ( _l tiI ELEVATION-1720 �� o > TD _ -�. I ag U 0 • r . • I _ II����E� ADMINISTRATIVE RENOVATION 1 E c Noe 4,14 NEW AUDITORIUM ADDITION I'I • ° /.•�.�, :•: s .. 6•c •S•..♦.♦•� JuJ11 1•i i i S i• i i Oiyiy47•���Oi'i i i�i`�%♦i$�b•�•:�`•': �i0'...�'- �i�Oo.`•i,'i♦i�����•:s�•!7`1+�•�i�4�1,.• ••4�•�'iA♦.��••+.i N C o 1"'1'1...ie.,,•,♦•e i.••••♦.1 ••••• f'••♦•c•♦•c f •� Oc,•y.•�i•♦. ,•.•.♦•.•♦•♦rfi•1 VO4♦♦,�t ••••••.••♦♦i•IL. ,....,.O1 4. �i'�•i•�♦�•i•.�a•�! C C o !41„ ■ `I `„„'1 . • ♦�9.�.•�•..a•.♦•♦ ♦• i!.!i.a �...•.S±.♦!•. i0!JQ•1.4•�.♦;S♦!.4 ;• !._Aut!..•.irb�'.�iw '�►r�i,�♦BOA...... C N O • CO CD 0 *'Sl.E•.•s, '� y� A� ari I/1 MII I f��(1. I 0I�I 1 1 Iq .. PIP,.LANE 24 . ai„� ' Ij��I'�2 ���lam'4'"4"000 ,- - - -Mo '" / all. 411111. MIL Mk - • . Are 4..., •:.GR�,11,1; -w b- P. m, ••••iw=b.N;MKe wm17 s. •cd b!' / %I:4A xv NO) ;'. Z.1".. P." C./ I 111 i ' Li 1 s. ....... c? i I •` ' ■• 4�, .. ',7 .. t�M!o•OtY.LK TO ADD.!u DAMN•.Dl..cbRs ro MOWN RrO••• :.•.KL[ '..10. mt>•0IL20v3'♦t.4 �•. .e••o.t .•ninfeuuT:x,. '• •..„�_ .S0 wa.nfr Oi �I '� ■ 111 MU..u.cw•1qL• • I ■ , ♦� J� 'i: .•S •• e>•. �' •. �., ;♦.: •• I e6 *iPOi ►. Susw&.cas 1:1 ASSOCIATES ii . OP* .•. •• . y.:'"::' •♦i. • 44'.0i O•♦i••A ice. V•j-. ..hlti - -i00. :Wi�'�tc 0< .♦. .Aft .�!'� '.6b i� Age Jam.-. ,.,� ••�••.♦i�.ti♦i.�•i.....•i•..��;••R. i...� •••♦ _•��•�.1.♦• ha.A•l.:.i•1.?7�C�.♦♦ ♦•.A•:••'66'•��•' " ♦•'•.. •.?''' •�t'U.."W..' AAA un6wi.0 Maaw�♦UP •Nr.miftlwAINSPir !, - WIWEIMIRE Krone■T0.n•b.vim NOM OUNTO•r.e - IZ 2 rD ROD..,.•. 1T•.!•ALCM!K.o..t•.■K tkeTM•Ot..t*AND E I LI lx,.T.i]•ol4lA LK r0 O+.O TO.t01•W .D.R,vr!TO...w.LOT YO.CCLb•DTa.1 U !xTlTC tKV.•.I.L!ScTfDIYI !x♦T b.G.C..DRI/!YO Ou.*TO AVIAN 142nd AVENUE S.E. PL...ALDN• .�.■.!. Ce i • ! 61 CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the day of YY\0.ktin , 2000, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing e..eloortE Oectslo-v1 documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing IM 1 ke_ -To y?3e-vse-h 4 ev\ n S canool be st vt Lisa -3-01tYtsaYl 1JLR gwuto • (Signature of Sender) 301.h4nt.. r.STATE OF OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) �J I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that ,,q� �.6b, T'� . �� Pv �.tJ signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the ues and purposes mentioned in the instrument. b�U NOTARY PUBLIC Notary Public in nd for the State of Washingt STATE OF WASHINGTON Notary (Print) MARILYN KAMCHEFF COMMISSION EXPIRES My appointment Mf pROINTMENT EXPIRES:6-29-03 1.3NiE 2r",2003 Project Name: -cur) � Scrn00I RennUclTtav} I Hach-NI/ Project Number: i~OA . q 9 . Bi 1 S PI _W l V° NOTARY2.DOC REPORT City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works DECISION ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION DECISION DATE: March 22, 2000 Project Name: Hazen High School Renovation/Addition Applicant/Owner: Renton School District File Number: LUA-99-137, SA-A, V-B Project Manager: Lesley Nishihira Project Description: The Renton School District is requesting Site Plan Approval (SA-A)for the renovations proposed to Hazen High School. Approximately 11,907 square feet of the main building would be remodeled in order to create a commons area and improve the administrative wing within the school. Additional construction areas of approximately 26,812 square feet would also be construction for a new 650-seat auditorium and entrance additions. The project also includes the reconfiguration of parking areas, revisions to landscaping, and street improvements. Project Location: 1101 Hoquiam Avenue NE Exist. Bldg. Area SF: 249,040 sf Proposed New Bldg. Area SF: 21,329 sf Site Area: 33.9 acre Total Building Area SF: 270,369 sf Y n L�. :fit''� E L e a ?y ��' .. I - N. �.�, •� _. _.—Honsr IQi. 1118 s u - ; c, ' '..„ /, i, IT CENTRAL _ ,� � __ I�'. 9�- .•NI,NLANDS PLAZA. * ,,�� A �I ,� -- —a►`�_.•• . 4a ..°5' s ►: a T- .._t 5:—.--.ZI ..m,,.. ;i' ........ ' / s ... .�y� ,;� 41"i 1 m 1 ,- . a —� .av:«,•�•a.-t t-.i.,bra, :.-"'•Y^ MILE. Ile Ili • I --.�,--1—,.-__® ist �..•. - ( ., - :E . 2. Project Location Map sarpt City'of Renton P/B/PW Department Administ a Site Plan Approval Staff Report HAZEN HIGH SCHOOL RENOVATION/Auu,TlON LUA-99-137,SA-A, V-B REPORT AND DECISION OF MARCH 22, 2000 Page 2 of 6 PART ONE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND The Renton School District is proposing to perform renovations to Hazen High School, located in the Residential — 8 dwelling units per acre (R-8) zone. A major component of the renovation includes the addition of an auditorium to the southeast corner of the existing building. The auditorium is proposed at a building height of 38 feet. A variance from section 4-2-110A of the City's Development Regulations was approved by the Board of Adjustment October 24, 1999. The proposed auditorium addition would have a 19,500 square foot first floor (of which 17,400 square feet is new construction) and a 1,829 square foot second floor—for a total auditorium area of 21,329 square feet. The auditorium would be designed to accommodate approximately 650 to 680 seats. In addition to the auditorium, the renovation project includes the creation of a commons area within an existing courtyard, the remodeling of the administrative wing of the building, and the development of a new 9,412 square foot student entry plaza. The project also includes the reconfiguration of parking areas, revisions to landscaping, and street improvements to Hoquiam Avenue NE. A parking modification request was submitted with the application in order to exceed the maximum number of parking spaces permitted by the current parking regulations. The Renton School District has served as lead agency for the SEPA Environmental Review of the proposal. A Determination of Non-Significance — Mitigated (DNS-M) was issued for the project on February 18, 2000. The decision was followed by a two-week appeal period, during which no appeals were filed. The adopted mitigation measures include a Fire Mitigation Fee based on $0.52 per square foot of new construction as required for all new construction within the City. PART THREE: ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION - REPORT & DECISION This decision on the administrative land use action is made concurrently with the environmental determination. A. Type of Land Use Action XX Site Plan Review Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Conditional Use Binding Site Plan Special Permit for Grade & Fill Administrative Code Determination B. Exhibits The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing: application, proof of posting and publication, environmental review and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No. 2: Drawing No. CO.1, Vicinity Map (Received September 30, 1999). Exhibit No. 3: Drawing No. C4.0, Site Plan (Received September 30, 1999). Exhibit No. 4: Drawing No. A5.1, Architectural Elevations (Received September 30, 1999). Exhibit No. 5: Drawings No. L-1 through L-3, Landscape Plan (Received September 30, 1999). Exhibit No. 6: Page E6-W & E, City of Renton Zoning Map C. Consistency with Site Plan Criteria In reviewing the proposal with respect to the Site Plan Approval Criteria set forth in Section 4-9- 200E1 of the Site Plan Ordinance, the following issues have been identified by City Departmental Reviewers and Divisional Reviewers: sarpt • Cityof Renton P/B/PW Department Administ a Site Plan Approval Staff Report • HAZEN HIGH SCHOOL RENOVATION/AuulTION LUA-99-137, SA-A, V-B REPORT AND DECISION OF MARCH 22, 2000 Page 3 of 6 1. Conformance with the comprehensive plan, its elements and policies; The subject site is designated Residential Single Family (RSF) on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. The Comprehensive Plan contains policies that support the siting of educational facilities in residential designations in order to serve area residents (Objective LU-KK and Policy LU- 249). The existing high school, and therefore the renovation of the facility, is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. 2. Conformance with existing land use regulations; The subject site is zoned Residential at 8 dwelling units per acre (R-8). School expansions of up to 10% are permitted in this zoning designation subject to Site Plan Approval. The proposal's compliance with the development standards of both the R-8 zone and the parking regulations is discussed below. Setbacks —The R-8 zone requires a minimum street frontage and rear yard setback of 20 feet. The required side yard setbacks are 5 feet. The only modification to the existing building would take place on the east side of the site. The auditorium addition would result in a setback of approximately 45 feet from the site's eastern property line. Building Height — The R-8 zone restricts building height to 2 stories and 30 feet. The proposed auditorium addition, at 38 feet height, exceeds this requirement. Although all other aspects of the proposal comply with this requirement, the auditorium was required to obtain approval of a height variance from the Board of Adjustment. On October 27, 1999, the Board of Adjustment approved the auditorium facility's request to exceed the R-8 zone's height limitation by 8 feet. Lot Coverage — The maximum lot coverage allowed by buildings in the R-8 zone is 35%. The construction of the 19,500 square foot auditorium and 9,412 square foot entry way addition, in addition to the 40,063 square feet of existing building footprint, arrives at a lot coverage of approximately 14%. Parking and Landscaping — The site is currently developed with existing parking areas and landscaping. The project does include revisions to the existing parking areas, which would result in an increased amount of on-site parking spaces. As part of the land use application, the applicant has submitted a parking modification request in order to exceed the maximum number of parking spaces permitted by code. Staff will recommend as a condition of approval, that the applicant obtain approval of the modification request prior to the issuance of building permits. In the event the modification is not approved, the applicant would be required to revise the site plan so that it conforms to all parking code requirements. 3. Mitigation of impacts to surrounding properties and uses; The proposed remodel would not adversely impact surrounding properties and uses. Potential impacts to surrounding properties would be minimal considering the site is currently developed and no major modifications to the site are proposed. Potential short-term noise and traffic impacts would result from the initial construction of the project. Existing code provisions that limit construction work hours, and the applicant's construction mitigation plan, which indicates proposed work hours from 7:00 am to 7:00 PM, Monday through Friday, would mitigate these impacts. 4. Mitigation of impacts of the proposed site plan to the site; The proposal is not expected to adversely impact the site. No sensitive areas are located on or near the subject property. As indicated in the applicant's construction mitigation description, best management practices would be used to reduce erosion and sedimentation impacts to the site. sarpt • • Cityof Renton P/B/PW Department Administ 3 Site Plan Approval Staff Report • HAZEN HIGH SCHOOL RENOVATION/Auu,TION LUA-99-137, SA-A, V-B REPORT AND DECISION OF MARCH 22, 2000 Page 4 of 6 5. Conservation of area-wide property values; The proposal would allow the Renton School District to modify Hazen High School so that it is suitable for its use of the property. The project would provide much needed on-site facilities and is anticipated to conserve property values in the vicinity. 6. Safety and efficiency of vehicle and pedestrian circulation; The proposal includes the reconfiguration of existing parking areas on the site. The project would result in an increased amount of parking spaces, as well as pedestrian access and landscaping above current code requirements. All aisle dimensions, stall dimensions, and driveways have been designed safely and efficiently. 7. Provision of adequate light and air; The proposed additions are designed appropriately as to provide adequate light and air circulation to the building and the site. 8. Mitigation of noise, odors and other harmful or unhealthy conditions; It is anticipated that minimal noise and odor impacts would result from the initial construction of the site. These short-term impacts would be mitigated by the applicant's construction mitigation plan. The proposed development would not generate any harmful or unhealthy conditions. Noise impacts associated with increased traffic and activities resulting from the completed project would not increase above existing conditions. 9. Availability of public services and facilities to accommodate the proposed use; and There will be adequate and available public services and facilities to accommodate the existing and proposed development on the site, provided the applicant pay the required Fire Mitigation Fee, based on $0.52 per square foot of new construction, as imposed by the Renton School District's Threshold Determination issued February 18, 2000. The fee is estimated at $17,282.20 and is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. Otherwise, the proposal is not anticipated to significantly alter the demands for such services or facilities. 10. Prevention of neighborhood deterioration and blight. The proposal will serve to prevent neighborhood deterioration and blight by improving an existing development. XX Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. D. Findings, Conclusions & Decision Having reviewed the written record in the matter, the City now enters the following: 1) Request: The Applicant has requested Administrative Site Plan Approval for the Hazen High School Renovation and Addition Project, File No. LUA-99-137, SA-A, V-B. 2) Environmental Review: The applicant's file containing the application, State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation, the comments from various City departments, the public notices requesting citizen comment, and other pertinent documents was entered as Exhibit No. 1. sarpt • City'of Renton P/B/PW Department Administ Site Plan Approval Staff Report • HAZEN HIGH SCHOOL RENOVATION/AuuiTION LUA-99-137,SA-A, V-B REPORT AND DECISION OF MARCH 22, 2000 Page 5 of 6 3) Site Plan Review: The applicant's site plan application complies with the requirements for information for site plan review. The applicant's site plan and other project drawings are entered as Exhibits No. 2 through 6. 4) Comprehensive Plan: The subject proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Residential Single Family (RSF). 5) Zoning: The Site Plan, as presented, complies with the zoning requirements and development standards of the Residential — 8 dwelling units per acre (R-8) Zoning designation. 6) Existing Land Use: Land uses surrounding the subject site include: North Single family residential, zoned R-8, East: Single family residential, zoned R-8; South: Single family residential, zoned R-8, and West: Single family residential, zoned R-8. E. Conclusions 1) The subject proposal complies with the policies and codes of the City of Renton, provided all conditions of approval are satisfied. 2) The proposal complies with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Residential Single Family; and the Zoning designation of Residential — 8 dwelling units per acre. F. Decision The Site Plan for the Hazen High School Renovation and Addition Project, File No. LUA-99- 137, SA-A, V-B, is approved subject to the following condition: CONDITION: 1. The applicant shall obtain approval of the parking modification request pertinent to this application. In the event the parking modification is not approved, the applicant will be required to revise the site plan in order to comply with the parking regulations as adopted by the City of Renton. The satisfaction of this requirement will be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of Building Permits. EFFECTIVE DATE OF DECISION ON LAND USE ACTION: SIGNATURES: Q9-457A,__ Z6v Jan anson,Zoning Administrator date TRANSMITTED this 22nd day of March, 2000 to the applicant and owner: Mike Torgerson Renton School District Capital Projects Office 1220 North 4th Street Renton,WA 98134 TRANSMITTED this 22nd day of March, 2000 to the project contact: Lisa Johnson DLR Group 900 Fourth Avenue, Suite 700 Seattle,WA 98164 sarpt • City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administ Site Plan Approval Staff Report • HAZEN HIGH SCHOOL RENOVATION/Auu:TION LUA-99-137, SA-A, V-B REPORT AND DECISION OF MARCH 22, 2000 Page 6 of 6 TRANSMITTED this 22nd day of March, 2000 to the following: Larry Meckling, Building Official C.Duffy, Fire Prevention Neil Watts,Public Works Division Lawrence J.Warren,City Attorney South County Journal Land Use Decision Appeal Process Appeals of the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM April 5, 2000. If no appeals are filed by this date, the action will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)430-6510. Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Fire Prevention 1. The preliminary fire flow is 2750 gpm,which requires one fire hydrant within 150 feet of the building and two additional hydrants within 300 feet of the building. 2. The entire new and existing building is required to be fully sprinklered by City Ordinance. 3. Separate plans and permits are required for the fire alarm and sprinkler systems. Entire fire alarm system shall meet existing codes. 4. The Renton Fire Department supports any requests to exceed maximum number of permitted parking stalls. Parking at this location has been an enforcement problem in the past. Building 1. The project must comply with the current(1997) Uniform Building Code. Plan Review—Sewer 1. This project is located in the Aquifer Protection Zone 2. 2. There is an existing 8" sanitary sewer main NE 10th St. 3. No structures may be located over the sanitary sewer main. 4. Any use in the building subject to oils or grease shall require the installation of a grease interceptor or oil/water separator as determined at the time of plan review. Plan Review—Water 1. The site is located in the Aquifer Protection Zone 2. 2. The project site is located in the 565 Pressure Zone. 3. There is an existing 12"watermain in the (unimproved) right-of-way of NE 12th St. This watermain is a line that deadends at a fire hydrant. See City of Renton drawing#903 for the AsBuilt engineering plans. Plan Review—Storm Drainage 1. A drainage report was submitted with the formal application for the project and appears to be in order. 2. There are storm drainage facilities in NE 12th St. 3. There are storm drainage facilities in NE 10th St. 4. There are storm drainage facilities in Hoquiam Av NE. 5. A drainage control plan designed per the King County Surface Water Manual will be required for this project. If there is 5,000 square feet or more of new impervious area subject to vehicular use, a Biofiltration Swale is required, depending on the calculations for the site development. 6. The Surface Water SDC fees of$0.129 (but not less than $385) per square foot of new impervious area may be required if not previously paid. Plan Review—General 1. All required utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed Civil Engineer. 2. Permit application must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. The fee for review and inspection of these improvement is 5% of the first$100,000 of the estimated construction costs; 4% of anything over$100,000 but less than $200,000, and 3% of anything over$200,000. Half of the fee must be paid upon application for building and construction permits, and the remainder when the permits are issued. There may be additional fees for water service related expenses. See Drafting Standards. sarpt j,I,,, I I LL) r�, —•—•---• _ i �p e 1 ,,,—,,;, ——— ——— ————— l 1 O-e o-O---...azzzi„,a)? u o� i O I ❑ I ❑NM C,MOIS I ::•mcYs-ur C s l I ril\\ H1 ! I aPf �a 1 If I.WO CLAY C NYC l „ I1 II',' •I o • • I , ALw , i l • l l — I 1 n'aeeH",P' ,,, / 1 I I« i .[w u+m. +al . i uu,iii,u ,iuiiiiiiuiii�,i 5. 1 , V A►A ii,A.,,ii„ii�A►A,iiii r l • I ILri I. ' \ FI gM ,• t. . I I ❑ I I a I I L 71.a.i ' I • • II f:w:.ntA:r b -- — I �7M I. II -- a ...s i I I • \ ' ;— i NAM IHa,won �© �/ I , wawa.-.no• • I �Iap'.L,I� aHarrr w II• I I I I l I II I i S..L l-:r'.S. I • MI a-wl.lr LOOM.10 WM.Art 11111: I: g;:a MWOW La .I.®•L Alai 1• ,�I�, .K r i .e "[ 01.1 wo a- cal-WO/ row CM OS,MOP I f ` .[.LP • , t ,I I - - CC OWN NW I I S: ,�. WM eu •: ,.0 wr a nn�H""' �qyq,!r I IA• l a H.P. L l•wr l-Nit ,I 1 � o .wr �, /� _ . n..,o m[.o«-. a-en er dd..""YY 11[-w.m �I �i a•nP a..n.r r I.As real' I w r mil_«.m [ ' o :a. I L e•w r rs.l. &g� I i -w ar II '` •0 II I I i l"„K w l 1 rirle �111• � 4r,�.. � w�w.x' ��'t/�/, �. owe le I I em •• l�r�MII �/ �LHP.. I 1111111111/0 a oaa HOP ir• a owl HAw OW 0•0010 a H•PI Hs 142nd AVENUE 8.E. Ham• - 1- H • •---- a•owI ION "— r war aas, iIl'I 1:-wL r4 r�P .rL y� la[/un rr 4-' .��,eQa,owl H.w a AH[n MO MI aw,n' r IS'Aa.0 f-w..' L Or[0Oltl f aalle L I' sF-IHI�' C« I%CONCII I. MI arrr' L I,• rx r r r•ay.rI[.r r II.OC Al relr <ii•nPl rrL rH-err.NaL a ,,�,,,,/�rw ili••nxCPC a w CMrCOW S..r• CV'C.r f-w.r LO LOW..N..e a ulov HOe Lan nn-en ION 1•iPx"c`sr w.'O. I<ic.. •'-.ii'' 0/01 j1 . UTILITY PLAN/DRAINAGE CONTROL PLAN C K ,,, C.IVal.61” IF•WLIMIT EN -ram ILI _ Ads• UTILITY PLAN/DRAINAGE CONTROL PLAN SITE PLAN APPROVAL C4.0 DLR Group ''',...:"1 4 or� _ � �a. • ,,. „ p ( ` HAZEN HIGH SCHOOL RENOVATION AND AUDITORIUM ADDITION SUBMITAL -rr As— v" Wa d'-'rr `_i ---- ono.Iowa ` li la l;I. li in l= lli= I! � J!' IIiIi '= - -i ��� m,..,o�.., t1'ti�i ..� M-.11011M1.111—n !1st iiiiiii _= _._= _____1 i= 1_____. _ ____0_ IL____,.._,,, 1,___„„ _ _ ___ ___ __Jr= _ . -,_. ____ .ANION num WU AIOTAL ®South Elevation ,T' ®North Elevation O e 0 „t7 if) :' ,. 1 . 0'- ..,-,..c, °°°"a`" 13 E 3 . ! D maII,,�• - — 1 �r _ '.a.n,,....-..o c 17 4 O Mill _ 0.=,>�: _ •......� , tales tr!M try ram.=.1ff' i $i t r —� ?._ ,..,o>nn....,.o.,.,a�.... I C co ...„_.0,........,....__ cz--z, e O e e _...—•__= A= D0 OO =_— ';L . _ 0r— O -0,.. -0- -O -0,.. 0 O -_Om. LO.. 0 -0- 0- o East Elevation (.6 U n- 471 to 0 V ,v t I 1 I WI . .,i, rri •T N • > d�.k IIIII t� 'ti T a . —_( -• i E ____—..---L o - ,'� , w •fix SAS -i r. 3 -,,..,‘.- in . .,,, t ,:,.; .:..L . ...,...r_....;•,.._..,.,ii:„.,;,,,ii.,:,,v.„•:?k;-,4..?5'.,N.i',A..-i' ,.::H- ''L‘• 1 D DO DO — -; 11 ri WE ,- 00 00 00 =L . --O'-a Lay —0".• LO,.• "..0 0 o 0 . ®East Elevation—Continued(Northern Portion) (EllPartial North Elevation—Along Gridline 7 =L = - �^ I _ 1n mi iin . , — a = -r a I I , i DEL EMI ..id i IL -•- �� O O O O O O O ee eo oe 0 0 05 ce 1 Door Types Relite Frames Storefront, Window, Louver Types ■i■ J ---k---„,' . 4 SITE PLAN APPROVAL '"_,UGMII-1AL © =� • 9/24/9') __, 7, L W scuc.r/ref —1— 1— • ------ i r / RECYCLE PAvrei wp•wwn C 0 A euLow TO rum..[%w - '. , . ..,::-.....„ ,,_ . ,...:. .0 ®®O O o O 'D. ^ ,.„, :,:, � , O • = • JAE • OQ • o • Q 0 _ .7 r / u u, 1 1 O° ° : f'• O $11 ,,€1..;...;:. • ° 01•1Jl,:bl JI HAZEN HIGH ) c. al C ° °" e e • 2 0 ° I li e c ° !'� - F/N/SHED A ECE✓A7ON; C E 1 °f t�, _ _ 4f _{__I `j!Do O 0 -OI ° °--o-I-o o o �'.ro�..eaAn er.u. • i E fn C 0 , 1 I ,,, ... i.= O Itrie T ° I ° "'� NEW AUDITORIU C N 00 REAM ANC wan TO uAW. `�a4�..••i�.TT•: .a•ie =wl`�_J�'�v U4. ati` ..�.r. ,;�`•w� :ty am .• 111111C •� ARAN lb MEMO•AIeo.H Lrn:.Do.lAr 1 • ♦•�� v^", !`,` l '^l, gilill Ry-i i. COMO.EON1WEE*V Kelm'L...*WA - 1'' - -•.•AP:��� 3��./V. „�'���it'9r yt-- •NLLMAYArOPT.ACTSTALLS iit`. ` 4 1 iOW! 24' .a •• I 1 i0w/x.A.! a f"F�i'i�i i� a°_" II'1T'1I• ��l �•�• y`-� M�r�'rt 1i�i •P •'"` Ihi�JI'r`�i,r��y�:����<�c r ii• q�,.yam,►Ito _ '.. '/ 0- 9 G _0-- "d''•• •�a� *:4' `.4 N.'.4,•••• .• /!.\`•.\L -RELOCATE E.RETIRE 67 rir..xea H r.MOeaiN l,CMYLi SON woos MCAr>TTtl ACCa..aL,OA/RATE.nrl ..DjCA.eo A.l& no,oeAL RLA..r.w.ALCa.LOT..Nie K_ I .W.erta exwnn wn.ce �/ uwwIt .TOA� A...iTTr D) AD CLAW a'.o..c.. "D°'PLANTED MEDIAN I42ND AVE SE I 142nd AVENUE p - _ _ _ . SITE PLAN APPROVAL 'SUBMITTAL © G,---o. t _ 9/24/99 ___ ..T 2_R01Re. SCK!N/ICl i ::/. • LEGEND ¢a' •,,R'�' A m ; TOTAL SQUARE F00tAGE OF SITE 1,478,617 S.F./ 33.9 ACRES = 00- , ......„.„.... '1 �4$4 ,� / V. OUILDING/ FLOOR SQUARE•FOOTAG_,ES ' W Q ,n:� r„ n EXISTING NORTHWEST BUILDING ' 24,734 S.F. N i - EXISTING MAIN BUILDING- FIRST FLOOR 155.329 S.F. PROPOSED-MAIN BUILDING- FIRST.FLOOR 9,412 S.F. O C EXISTING MAIN BUILDING- SECOND FLOOR 68,977 S.F. J O o - - - 2, AUDITORIUM RENOVATION- FIRST FLOOR 19,500 S.F. C,0 %, AUDITORIUM RENOVATION- SECOND FLOOR 1,829 S.F. < I - % AUDITORIUM RENOVATION- TOTAL 21.328 S.F. CO d 0 o j TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF ALL FOOTPRINTS 208,975 S.F. 2f !0•! ALLOWABLE BUILDING LOT COVERAGE 35% m , ACTUAL LOT COVERAGE 14% o ! S p m '/ TOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACES 595,811 S.F. C C _ € EXISTING TO REMAIN 558,806 S.F. Q Oa `d 2 PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS SURFACE 37,005 S.F. m— TD 7 g > & t,o0Ro.a.. I-- "' LANDSCAPE O`L m Rec.uR.Ave.Re MOP"MO. -- ♦- /' ///L/////i!//////%1/.'//i / /"-/' a�Ci a.RLCM11'o.YTO4 Rxq.RG . ! I'� S �! SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING LANDSCAPING 36,100 S.F. G C =o• `oprotero 0 © 0 O 0 0 PROPOSED INTERIOR PARKING LOT LANDSCAPING 24,465 S.F. ��o 's 4.4:111: PROPOSED PLAZA LANDSCAPING 17,975 S.F. N f!,� j TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE- PROPOSED LANDSCAPING 42,440 S.F. a_c3 ❑ cr ❑ a aal . o ❑ �j � , ; , , //./ .. ALLOWABLE BUILDING HEIGHT 30'-0" OR 2 STORIES (ZONE RS) C Hp� PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHT 38.-0" m p Q""' BUILDING SETBACKS REQUIRED BY CODE 20.-0" - _ _ — �"_ /7:eN LOAF L-01 °E'< _ �.�� _ _ "',°"'°_ / L 2 SQUARE FOOTAGE OF WETLANDS N/A .$ 1 - ;•r SQUARE FOOTAGE OF SLOPES GREATER THAN 40% N/A N J 11 f , i PARKING ANALYSIS A �'1 i STALLS REQUIRED BY CODE 218 HAZEN HIGH S �♦� '.� � FiNiSNED Two EXISTING PARKING STALLS- FULL 332 / ELEVAT/ON=47 EXISTING STALLS- ADA ACCESSIBLE 8 Svswau«6 ASSOCIATES // FULL PARKING STALLS- EXISTING AND PROPOSED 351 ��__ __ ADA ACCESSIBLE STALLS- EXISITNG AND PROPOSED S s4 ;MI A COMPACT STALLS- EXISTING AND PROPOSED 16 W.. c / TOTAL NUMER STALLS- EXISTING AND PROPOSED 375 >Z b rNKM R14U it _ 40' BUS PARKING I 'A"R•R'"L`*TALL '�" /,/ STACKING SPACES FOR DRIVE-UP WINDOWS N/A (8 ! AO LA.MGA.R raw •• i t�ds�; 1 / - c....5 js. oIi 61 0 ( % �\ • SITE PLAN APPROVAL SUBMITTAL © IlL 11, 9/24/99 .v O ID - .. 7. O ® 1 / I /, ,//!/!1/,'JSJ////,'/1///////////1//•///,'/,'/./7/7V I I, ❑ o ❑ a / I „- 1 /71 C i P p Q i c / i b Z O / II J -0 a I I F iii Q v COMMONS RENOVATION I rn 17 < < « tc HAZEN HIGH SCHOOL O O j it f/N/SHED FLOOR o Z ! �I fLEV.1T/ON—17?.O / i r > C / i / .N / i C C E .♦/ I E �' o % I ! J 0— j `'" 111 L y ADMINISTRATIVE RENOVATION C 7111111111 !` `' NEW AUDITORIUM ADDITION :1'f11""" •„IA V.' i.X.? •♦4,1 (Sp 0 j� Ilimc '%, :♦iif 10.iiv :•;Ve0 i�i•♦•Oi��♦i i.: !....Ai♦i •4 irp�i"..At.V•rj4 ��y~14.loe i. �i ve..�•aE' •i'0 vvov.:.`' N y \° ■ ` ♦I41 O.O ♦ •. •• ♦ •♦•♦ ••I♦• • ♦•♦r•:I� >* • •• i. ♦•♦O_ `i::efp 0� ♦.r♦•. w-••�� .-e�•.♦ •w�!i�1♦:7 C.-O�..S.!.r..t�f.��a♦♦rl♦ ..pw��!♦t 1•Ae.{ ..•,.•..r;•�h AS �.7•�•�..-.!� Vi {r!i d� *ift�.1'4.�•�'�.h ���111� �'',•igio>—/„'1� T__ \;;:1/ _ le— co= O • ••. i r� Y 1/ 1 ill Ate' MIME. i-ummt II 1 -__1_ 416 T. t4 t 016..o vIK•.IR..M.O.LAM � �.4 7�.,'' .PP\N. '•A'••.SR•7''►e l;�, ne�YA :... ..AMA:.2,WANM.b;O. At 66.+.V 066.`MIA KT NO.::A • vialil ��,,.N1111110117886......11M' • ■■ �I wok .wib%i ,eII I' .> \ .1sA ro[H,eo[RrTw►Iwcw LOT, J •.♦.♦ IWO L .,li,' .•.a. 4Meo wArrL To Ioo NM aka•.wtlwLK►ro MOWN rLraw» x.rs�[ <♦i<,• ♦ • '���Ii.J.s ✓�v"•°�1 Y I ' `, �Ynr crie r■rtw. ■ n.LLL PM...aT..L,6 ■ • Ell • .. Mi••♦♦,Wi1•♦ ' :, •♦114t., ♦;iv •11:,• •� I I I a� IIII aT.uye I l I rela� ♦•i.�! ]0'-� SUSAN BUCKfl rim'• :. r�i %♦i •44, ♦w' i♦i�.. s♦i �J.:.. rr.�•� As s o c i nT e s .w�:�w'PJ::.*•.•• A,,,,,...AA .',AA,A •♦••6 ,... .. 40a' .■P '... .♦< - . 1.• 4,•�e ..•I 1.,..iA� Ay, /h .M, ♦ T o.►..ti..... � ,. ON�w•.. ♦ � A ,�r•:G.y:♦:...^:•�❖�,• �•.:••:<A•..gip<A d. �� v• • �v�.. .J•.v.-r A"K...v:. a4Tw�M pi.i>••wn sn.rW .aroa.6 S0I na a KIN NOCK CUTC....6 Zvi ac w•.,R.n .LP6 too AA!.r .Xi♦T.6•ioeruuc Iwo 1 I o ax66T.6 1110.6LK MO on TO NOV. L Ix../WM.•La.011.... IDI wra,•TO rIIRNi LOT re•TO owM U 142nd AVENUE SCY .E. RANT., K ax•Tw.aa»OMI.oP....t0....I J — 0 ; A D6 - 3 T23N R5E W 1/2 i [ tom" I ,- -4 RM—N---- ----- _ ../.. kill - NE 1 111�n StO ..u. :p �e n _ _ __ rig O r — _ - boo CD 11 -1frtill . --. !' M NE1 ' - �z _IL__ i R—i —{ i i _� '~ SE 118th St. '- a!th Ct. --- ------�--8 - _-I 6 Fil ...:::4 r_ .b - NE 8th St• I i 7.3 g IL— I ' 11 ' INIMEW .?-h: ! y - -- �, „J i= __ SE 121st St. I F tom`. f '!-' r-1,,.:, 1 " NE 6t: .� ,-- /, itii.24, Lb i _ - - _ -1 �R-14_ 0----,'6,4 pi R_ RM—I cr r - R-14 o "I.. c •K, L cg .T.1 —+rin -- ^C EC li 1 -4-1 -1L,a -5 �� L. . S _ NE5h _la._'.1_,._1 _ St. El _ tati > ♦� -- IIINIMINIEZ , .—-- 1 CS- — JCS - �� C S 1 -RT8 j1 ... — - R—110__St. I 2-NE 4th St T I [:1----- - .---i- ---1 1 . 0 1 : !_-__, ---; ! 1 H.'4 ' r-i'' [, i F6 . 15 T23N R5E W V2 ® 00 (11";) 48 °° E6 ZONING l` P/B/PW TICIEMCAL=VIM 10 T23N R5E W 1/2 .., ZONING MAP BOOK k A. `c *I.. 110 6 ,I -0 a ID biL. i.(4 ,t I of' .. . 1 VI-r:5,•5 ' ri4'ID- S� fLi ,- \ ,r:cle, gigiaii:,..6,:,vila:,,.., , ,,,,:,:,:.3,,E,:07:,0,/,,,, _ i i, 4., 4/t„, . 1......_...._., , \ . or ::::. :::::::::,::::::::::::4:::c2„:„., ,c3r.:::,,„,iirof,..„..ic,.., on OA'N ' loN ,...' • .1.C7 EE:::-:. \ . Fr, /;ni#471.11 titlittlip .7,g -16,10 464 M[111-8L1.e'N' 3E `'• E' 1.5''1 1►a . '* � ' i•124N R5E<... «la ` L r 4 .iglllli" I i! l.`. :‘ tb pi'Zii-:: :•] -:,:- -0.3'i:::'', :- .'kw•' - ,,1 Iii- A riAl V1E414' - ' ' i k -IL, -81 min' ii‘ti-',4'.4;i ;=.=. ,-?:-]:::!:]::.:M: .::.::::-:-.-1,_:1;1: :-.,. ffil rZ INF -I_II1 11e11g)/pIii,.r.„,iji,,,,P, 'kFir)r. Irk\ :` :: :; 'Ltd 1 ! � al1e��t001 �� ,;..' �� I'Marilikre --.Arigi5-.-1-'-'1,W \ . Clii l' I:k-',."1-'41 lif - Iris 6 '11.! ..a.tko ia3 I o/.a, f w .1 N 0 �.�\ L'\, d �CFrini Iw 1,//�Pr . rirs. ' ,,_ 11 .act -- - `!R5E pri ,4 3 0 . - f �.I�� �[ '. ' ", b- Imo„ (FibNip. Ike- , , � ,,. A Mild �. 5 r a ll _ �1 ' ! ! ' ; �t1pr ••vi 1. �, it Ef� _': �►t I Fr ,rfr hlv�'4 ii "'`'' ;--L U7kL1IJ1JI81YNW I- ta'--\‘ Met' . or A.*_-. ' ''.- keirf ,--- .. M, i 1 'fir "%%%fir i1otiete I� kik'. - - p. . �I�/`i�,l�'s 1 1di tr-�l ' .I a .'I..n`i' .✓ 22 T23N RE'.f7 23 T23N R5E'��e court., , „r� - f a a ! it . .10 :--I „dm, I.a..� !'"11 iftli 41 i ' 1 .0�F • III , • iwirial ir sil,- ;1::4- ;L..: A. p.?5,,r,. ...q,„ ,,,,, Is,,j F 712 ',',''',._'1,-`,'r."'''' '. __ it' :7 l' il-..r. -- ` 64 Y ti ppir 0._ e r,,, A:i r ,1:, 7,„ � ' Ir . :eft � ;} ii :T237 0-7, 14, (.41 833 :::':_i;- .. ..- jy.-.- -_,,,,::,.., lasaassaar /A:IJ' ., , . i2T22NR5E b�l���tir,ar r; r.er � -� , � --- --- `- -. KROLL RC Resource Conservation n Convenience Commercial IP1 Publicly Owned PAGE ,/ I R I Residential 1 du/ac n Center Neighborhoods ._- Renton.City Limits (R-5 Residential 5 du/ac CS Center Suburbans -Adjacent City Limits IR-e Residential B du/ac CD Center Downtown* rxx,(Grey Text) Prosciutto SECT/TOW WRANGE RMH Residential Manufactured Homes ClR Center Office Residential ��ii Automall District A I� Commercial Arterial .•.•.I Automall District B I R-ID Residential 10 du/se IR-l4 Residential 14 du/ac CO Commercial Office • For additional regulations in overlay district. not shown on this map, pious sea ANC 4-S. I RN-I Residential Multi-Family Infill IH Industrial - Heavy LiIRe-N Residential Multi-Family Neighborhood Center IN Industrial - Medium PAGE mi ? IRN-C Residential Multi-Family Suburban Center IL Industrial - Light INDEX IRN-U Residential Multi-Family Urban Center* P-I Public Use 0 0 m E • D6 . 3T23N R5E E1/2 • R 8 f SE 112th P1. SE 113th ----4 ,___ R-51 =--, Ij F - I I .... sI Q R 8 C.0 NE 1 t ' /// ' ,-.1 I �� 1 R : SE 117th m or T SE 118th _ 0 T::: tiJ C d Lc z M g Zej.E 121st St. o RM-I VD a; SE 124th ; F �111� �.� ci W Cs. U \ - d -L Q i , C S ---o- _ 00 R-J __ __ I --I1 NE 4 th •St. I I 1' �I ' I 1 78 � o F6 . 15T23NR5EE1/2 ? 2° ' ° E6 ZONING 11+� ,,v.•C). P/B/PW "�''6°"w"�° 10 T23N R5E E 1/2 EC,lob ZONING MAP.. BOOK . . `!""'"17 174 fr,,,.....-L Ui ff� . 92`r i 4 P 931 `mot tF yf li it 459 ` L AE. din I.''� Rio .�1� �I. / s e"# .. {A �� �� ni -, s- 't' l -1..— ' i.'NJ:� AO l 41,i l(:l 28,24 '" i} R*7.- '1 ' �,1 : ::_C !I3 ' f, Ty ' T 'j •, +` fin. . v i l4,_ -':-...-,,inf.--'::::!T-:,::::',:::.,:.:,,i:„;:7.,.,,,;:44:ili!'::F-ii i..:!,:l 7.!'",..OK:, i'7.,', ,,, % ,,,,,,„, 3,,••• , ?, _ 0 • .,:_.c7 .., u ,_ .r. ---:a..::: :::-:::::--]Kri:K-...,. .fp:::-:-,i. :..::j:s Eri-En.W.:E:P:� "��� .v..r+!,.,; C5Nr• .. I:TI24NR5E I : [Ili0� , <>;:=<s °' d• .may ;�1 e 71 s: 7 , v ., . . ; A ®.y, La ,, 3 �' 4 HiG ►/r 3� 3 R ;,�''� .�T23N R i ':7-1�, « ,� r4 q X•táT y, e r L 11�ti _,, ?! c -.' vl•IA-1 ks: 1 e,- J6C'1.• I y� [i,l t ii IQ'. . _ f th .1, ►` J 'rti ii.i:Sl l SE I li..1 i li r'i P� EL, -, 10 ill REE ,. i re (%ice4117,11 r �x ' r FF - :i• • .. . ., , :..tiip '• -'- --.,-L-fito. t 1 5 ,,z,,.. 4_ , Im , ,. __,)_Ar '.'::Ill i — - - s ' .-.:1). 7-,0,,,„ 1, ,...-:.4, w -...,-, E!, �►\Y r jig iilit r . . I� 2 mill �, ' ,"3',5 , �/ ,_ ` j1 ,r, . ! 371 I' 8 _'`t Wii,... ti V AL,N %--trii, 1,,,e‘,1,:i r , , I PAP i',76, ify., •'a L.,1,123IrI ltcd`1'di IN z >7�'' ' R t `- -` .1 a T23N R511•d 23 T23N R5E 24 ,,rt 1.4i — 0 1 :-fl. . _ 1e �1: ��a 8211J25 E iip i , • i ii -,..--f_ tat es-, l � _! r I " 1 23 R4E ��23 ] % _ I ' E 5E • 51 8251 7. ... �' 1 4 st;, t i 84 . % ,s. SYr 38 (r3NR� 1T2 a } l �E �' 6o i 3 O •V€. aa. 'A • f�r,3N E ' 35 T23N---_=_-_= 38 - 6� i .,......-- �S i' as__ 0;- ",,.;r'• I( 833 8 It . tea...:1I , jtip...„„_.:..,,..:..,.,_.. f� , . f22N R4E I - — :T2. 5 IrU :__:::i:::::E.-: iE,..::,:.; -2g1R E 4 ". �� -3 , R E� ,l 2 T22N R5E � KROLL RC I Resource Conservation n Convenience Commercial <Pl Publicly Owned R-1 I Residential 1 du/ac n Center Neighborhood* -- - Renton City Limits R-3 I Residential 5 du/ac n Center Suburban* - Adjacent City Limits R-e I Residential 8 du/ac r1 Center Downtown' (Grey Text) Prezones SECT/TOWN/RANGE ^ RMH I Residential Manufactured Homes I I Center Office Reaidentlal �iei' Automall District A a_a_ R-Ie I Residential 10 du/ac 0 Commercial Arterial I•;•j:1 Automall District D nCommercial Office • For additional regulations in overlay districts R-141 Residential 14 du/ac u not shown on this map, please see INC 4-3. 3 [RM-i I Residential Multi-Family Infill (-I Industrial - Heavy w Ice-el Residential Multi-Family Neighborhood Center 1—I Industrial - Medium PAGE a Z Residential Multi-Family Suburban Center I It I Industrial - Light Y INDEX as N co Residential Multi-Famlly Urban Center* 1-1 Public Um i le !� • . ..• con wry.-", t RK ..RuN (soot • el 0 .� Facilities & Operations Center viz s y OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR tZ Telephone: (206) 204-4403 Fax: (206) 204-4476 403 March 17, 2000 Washington Department of Ecology P.O. Box 47703 Olympia,WA 98504-7203 Re: Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance for the Hazen High School Remodeling and Auditorium Project On February 18, 2000, the Renton School District issued a Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance (MDNS) for the Hazen High School Remodeling and Auditorium Project (the "Project") under the Washington State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW. Copies of the MDNS and the Environmental Checklist for the Project were mailed to the Department of Ecology, The City of Renton, and Water District No. 90. Notice of the MDNS was published in the Daily Journal of Commerce and The South County Journal on February 18, 2000. Notice of the MDNS has been posted on the Hazen property. At the end on the 14-day public comment period, the only comments received were submitted by The City of Renton. The City stated in its comment letter that a fire mitigation fee would be required before issuance of a building permit for the Project. The City also stated that approval of an Administrative Site Plan Review for the Project would be required. No other comments on the SEPA MDNS were received. The Renton School District will complete all applicable Project permit approvals and will comply with all mitigation measures required for the Project. Sincerely, Rick Stracke Executive Director, Facilities &Operations DEVELOPMENT 'LANNING CITY OF RENTON Cc: Lesley Nishihira, City of Renton MAR 1 2000 Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Water District#90 RECEIVED RS:sa 1220 North 4th Street,Renton,Washington 98055 �• t . CITY 1 E' RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department J e Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator February 22, 2000 a• ja 14 IRA tOkAVA-:___ Rick Stracke 2 2 Renton School District f HEN IJ 1 Nei , z Executive Director, Capital Projects Office f L 7hi7i 1220 North 4th Street Renton, WA 98055 C.Z1t1 �- Subject: Hazen High School Renovation and Addition Project Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated Dear Mr. Stracke: The City of Renton appreciates the opportunity to comment on the Determination of Non- Significance—Mitigated issued by the Renton School District for the proposed renovations and addition to Hazen High School. We would like to offer the following recommended mitigation measure at this time: 1. The City of Renton requires a Fire Mitigation Fee for all new construction within the City limits. This fee is assessed through the SEPA Environmental Review process. A Fire Mitigation Fee based on $0.52 per square foot of new building area is required prior to the issuance of building permits for the project. The Fire Mitigation Fee is estimated at $17,282.20 (33,235 square feet of new building area x$0.52 = $17,282.20). The City of Renton requires a separate land use permit for this proposal. An application has been made to the Development Services Division for Administrative Site Plan Review. A decision will be issued on this application once the appeal period for the SEPA threshold determination has been completed. Please forward all documentation pertinent to the SEPA process for this project to Lesley Nishihira, the project manager. She can be reached at (425)430-7270. We look forward to continuing our work with you on this proposal. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Environmental Determination for the Hazen High School Renovations and Addition Project. Sincerely, Gregg Zimmerman,Administrator Planning/Building/Public Works Department cc: Mike Torgerson, Renton School District Jana Hanson Jennifer Henning Lesley Nishihira kl\ltVLRIfN S\(1FVFI CWP SFR\11FV&PI AN INc;\PRoJFCTsxgq-137.In\dnsm doc 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer • CITA . F RENTON ••+� Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator February 22, 2000 Rick Stracke Renton School District Executive Director, Capital Projects Office 1220 North 4th Street Renton, WA 98055 Subject: Hazen High School Renovation and Addition Project Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated Dear Mr. Stracke: The City of Renton appreciates the opportunity to comment on the Determination of Non- Significance— Mitigated issued by the Renton School District for the proposed renovations and addition to Hazen High School. We would like to offer the following recommended mitigation measure at this time: 1. The City of Renton requires a Fire Mitigation Fee for all new construction within the City limits. This fee is assessed through the SEPA Environmental Review process. A Fire Mitigation Fee based on $0.52 per square foot of new building area is required prior to the issuance of building permits for the project. The Fire Mitigation Fee is estimated at $17,282.20 (33,235 square feet of new building area x $0.52 = $17,282.20). The City of Renton requires a separate land use permit for this proposal. An application has been made to the Development Services Division for Administrative Site Plan Review. A decision will be issued on this application once the appeal period for the SEPA threshold determination has been completed. Please forward all documentation pertinent to the SEPA process for this project to Lesley Nishihira, the project manager. She can be reached at (425)430-7270. We look forward to continuing our work with you on this proposal. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Environmental Determination for the Hazen High School Renovations and Addition Project. Sincerely, /117/e e(Q7,,/ Gregg Zim rman, Administrator Planning/Building/Public Works Department cc: Mike Torgerson, Renton School District Jana Hanson Jennifer Henning Lesley Nishihira H•\n1VISIC)N S\nFVELOP SFR\DFV&PI AN ING\PROJFCTS\99-137 In\dnsm dac 1055 South Grady Way- Renton, Washington 98055 ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer Apv„D , , 0,00t . 5y Facilities & Operations Center � '• %.64 — - y OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR tT Telephone: (206)204-4403 Fax: (206)204-4476 403 _••hro March 17, 2000 Washington Department of Ecology P.O. Box 47703 Olympia,WA 98504-7203 Re: Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance for the Hazen High School Athletic Fields Improvement Project On February 18, 2000, the Renton School District issued a Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance (MDNS) for the Hazen High School Athletic Fields Improvements Project (the "Project") under the Washington State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW. Copies of the MDNS and the Environmental Checklist for the Project were mailed to the Department of Ecology, The City of Renton, and Water District No. 90. Notice of the MDNS was published in the Daily Journal of Commerce and The South County Journal on February 18, 2000. Notice of the MDNS has been posted on the Hazen property. At the end on the 14-day public comment period, the only comments received were submitted by The City of Renton. The City stated in its letter that they had no comments, but that a building permit for the Project would be required. The City also stated that approval of an Administrative Site Plan Review for the Project would be required. No other comments on the SEPA MDNS were received. The Renton School District will complete all applicable Project permit approvals and will comply with all mitigation measures required for the Project. Sincerely, pIANNING DE�co of RENTON Rick Stracke MAR 1 2000 'G Executive Director, Facilities & Operations RECEIVED Cc: Lesley Nishihira, City of Renton Water District#90 RS:sa 1220 North 4th Street, Renton,Washington 98055 6 7 CIT- OF RENTON `." Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator February 23, 2000 Rick Stracke Renton School District Executive Director, Capital Projects Office 1220 North 4th Street Renton, WA 98055 Subject: Hazen High School Athletic Fields Improvement Project Determination of Non-Significance -Mitigated Dear Mr. Stracke: The City of Renton appreciates the opportunity to comment on the Determination of Non- Significance—Mitigated issued by the Renton School District for the proposed improvements to the athletic fields at Hazen High School. At this time, the City has no comments regarding the proposed Determination of Non-Significance —Mitigated. The initial review of the proposal does not reveal any impacts which would require mitigation above and beyond existing code provisions. The City of Renton will require separate construction and building permits for the proposed improvements. No applications have been filed with the Development Services Division for this project. Please forward all documentation pertinent to the SEPA process for the athletic field improvements to Lesley Nishihira, the project manager. She can be reached at(425)430-7270. We look forward to continuing our work with you on this proposal. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Environmental Determination for the Hazen High School Athletic Field Improvements Project. Sincerely, ;'Li)ricc-iy 2--- i774/1/fizibz, ,/ Gregg Zimmerman, Administrator Planning/Building/Public Works Department cc: Mike Torgerson, Renton School District Jana Hanson Jennifer Henning Lesley Nishihira H:\DIVISION.S\DEVELOP.SER\DEV&PLAN.I NG\PROJECTS\99-137.In\dnsm2.doc 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, Washington 98055 ®This paper contains 50%recycled material.20%post consumer I CIT OF RENTON .. 6a Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesseballanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator CONCURRENCE February 23, 2000 u..172 a•a3•QD te•NiSKIKIRA'. 1JIiM/2•a Rick Stracke • -IF:N N I N G. Renton School District Executive Director, Capital Projects Office T. NANS0N �;, L/ZS 1220 North 4th Street Renton, WA 98055 Subject: Hazen High School Athletic Fields Improvement Project Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated Dear Mr. Stracke: The City of Renton appreciates the opportunity to comment on the Determination of Non- Significance— Mitigated issued by the Renton School District for the proposed improvements to the athletic fields at Hazen High School. At this time, the City has no comments regarding the proposed Determination of Non-Significance — Mitigated. The initial review of the proposal does not reveal any impacts which would require mitigation above and beyond existing code provisions. The City of Renton will require separate construction and building permits for the proposed improvements. No applications have been filed with the Development Services Division for this project. Please forward all documentation pertinent to the SEPA process for the athletic field improvements to Lesley Nishihira, the project manager. She can be reached at (425)430-7270. We look forward to continuing our work with you on this proposal. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Environmental Determination for the Hazen High School Athletic Field Improvements Project. Sincerely, Gregg Zimmerman, Administrator Planning/Building/Public Works Department cc: Mike Torgerson, Renton School District Jana Hanson Jennifer Henning Lesley Nishihira • • • • H:\DIVISION.S\DEVELORSER\DEV&PLAN.I NG\PROJECTS\99-137.In\dnsm2.doc 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer DEVELOPMENT PLANNING RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 403 CITY OF RENTON FEB 1 7 2000 MITIGATED DETER IENATION OF NONSIGNIFICANRECEIVED Hazen High School Renovation and Addition Project DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The Hazen High School renovation and auditorium addition project includes: (1) addition of a 650-680 seat auditorium (21,328 s.f.), (2) construction of a new commons area within the existing building and courtyard area, (3) remodeling of the administrative wing of the existing school building (9,971 s.f.), (4) reconfiguration of the existing staff/visitor parking areas, and (5) landscaping and street frontage improvements. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Hazen High School, 1101 Hoquiam Ave. N.E., Renton, WA 98059; Tax Parcel Number: U102305-9278. PROJECT PROPONENT: Renton School District No. 403. LEAD AGENCY: Renton School District No. 403. The lead agency for this proposal has determined that the proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This determination assumes compliance with all applicable state and local laws related to general environmental protection. This Determination of Nonsignificance is specifically conditioned on compliance with the conditions and mitigating measures described below. This information is available to the public upon request. CONDITIONS/MITIGATING MEASURES: 1. The Renton School District will require the following construction measures to mitigate any potential adverse impacts of the project during construction: a. An erosion and sediment control plan will be prepared and implemented with best management practices for identifying, reducing, eliminating, or preventing problems on site for preventing stormwater impacts off site. b. Erosion control measures will include filter fences, sediment traps, and rip-rap construction entrance, along with retaining existing paving around the construction area at the front of the building. c. Air emission control measures will include water spraying on the site to control dust, street cleaning of affected area streets, well-maintained gasoline and [3 20 1 2-0 80 5/SB003680489.DOC] -1- 2/14/00 I • C diesel engines, a ban on any burning, and promoting car and truck pooling to reduce vehicle emissions. d. Construction activities on the school site will be limited in area as much as possible in order to preserve existing vegetation. e. Noise control measures will include: construction equipment will be muffled and well-maintained; no equipment will idle longer than 30 minutes; equipment will be kept away from the site perimeters as much as possible. 2. The Renton School District will prepare and implement a stormwater drainage plan that will include open-air water quality filtration and subsurface water detention before discharge into the City of Renton stormwater system. 3. The Renton School District will prepare and implement a landscaping plan that will preserve as much of the greenbelt buffer of established trees as possible and will include the planting of new trees and shrubs on the site for aesthetic and visual separation functions, as well as for habitat and food source for wildlife. 4. The building plans will include energy conservation features for the heating and cooling systems and for the lighting system. 5. The building design will include exterior architectural features that will appear compatible with and enhance the design of the existing school building. 6. The on-site lighting will be designed to have limited dispersion and to focus light down; landscaping will shield off-site impacts of the lighting to the extent feasible. 7. The Renton School District will obtain and comply with all applicable permits and approvals for the development and construction of the proposed project. This Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2). The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted to the Responsible Official. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Rick Stracke POSITION/TITLE: Executive Director, Capital Projects Office ADDRESS: 1220 North 4th Street Renton, WA 98055 TELEPHONE: -25-2 -4470 SIGNATURE: DATE: Fe ruary 18, 2000 [32012-0805/SB003680489.DOC] -2- 2/15/00 RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 403 HAZEN HIGH SCHOOL RENOVATION AND ADDITION ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement(EIS)must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or"does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The checklist will be reviewed within 30 days. Delays may occur if you are asked to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impacts. A letter will be sent to you if additional information is needed. Therefore, it is in your interest to provide complete and detailed information the checklist. THE ORIGINAL SIGNED CHECKLIST MUST BE SUBMITTED AT TIME OF APPLICATION [32012-0805/SB003679677.DOC] 2/14/00 State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Hazen High School Renovation and Addition A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project: Hazen High School Renovation and Auditorium Addition 2. Name of applicant: Renton School District No. 403 3. Mailing address, telephone number of applicant and contact person: Mike Torgerson, Facilities Project Manager 1220 North 4th Street Renton WA 98055 Tel. (425) 204-4471; Fax (425) 204-4476 4. Date checklist prepared: February 9, 2000 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton, Department of Ecology 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Construction is scheduled to start 6/17/2000, with substantial completion on 8/15/2001. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. The Hazen athletic fields will be improved during the summer of 2000 as a separate project. A remodel and renovation of the remainder of the school building is planned for May, 2003 to September, 2004. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Geotechnical Engineering Report by PacRim GeoTechnical, Inc., May 12, 1999. Drainage Report by DLR Group, September 24, 1999. Traffic Analysis Report by Robert Bernstein, January 19, 2000. [32012-0805/SB003679677.DOC] -2- 2/14/00 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Site plan approval, sign approval, NPDES stormwater permit, building, mechanical, and electrical permits; height variance previously granted. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information or project description.) The Hazen High School renovation and auditorium addition project includes: (1) addition of a 650-680 seat auditorium (21,328 s.f.), (2) construction of a new commons area within the existing building and courtyard area, (3) remodeling of the administrative wing of the existing school building (9,971 s.f.), (4) reconfiguration of the existing staff/visitor parking areas, and (5) landscaping and street frontage improvements. 12. Location of proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If the proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range of boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Hazen High School, 1101 Hoquiam Ave. N.E., Renton, WA 98059 Tax Parcel Number(s): U102305-9278 Quarter: NE, NW; Section: 10; Township: 23N; Range: 5E [32012-0805/SB003679677.DOC] -3- 2/14/00 B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other: Terraced. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 5.6 percent. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example: clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Glacial till, consisting of recessional outwash, ablation till, and lodgement till. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Structural fill from a local commercial source will be placed under the new auditorium and parking lot, amounting to a total of 2,576 cubic yards import and 1,288 cubic yards export. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Minor erosion could occur as a result of filling and grading activities. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example: asphalt or buildings)? Approximately 40 percent. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Erosion control measures will include filter fences, sediment traps, and a gravel construction entrance, in accordance with City of Renton standards. Best management practices will be applied to control erosion and other impacts during construction. [32012-0805/SB003679677.DOC] -4- 2/14/00 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. During construction: normal diesel and gas emissions from construction equipment; dust during earthwork activities. During school operation: automobile and bus diesel emissions matching levels of existing school operation. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: During construction: water spraying on site to control dust, street cleaning of affected area streets, well-maintained gasoline and diesel engines to reduce emissions, ban on any burning, promoting car/truck pooling to reduce vehicle emissions. During school operation: promoting staff and student carpooling and bus ridership to reduce vehicle emissions in the area. 3. Water a. Surface: I. Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, salt water, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state the stream or river into which it flows. No. 2. Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans for this work. No. [32012-0805/SB003679677.DOC] -5- 2/14/00 3. Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in, or removed from, surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material and/or disposal site. None. 4. Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. No. 5. Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. 6. Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. b. Ground: 1. Will groundwater be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities of withdrawals or discharges, if known. No. 2. Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals . . . ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) is/are expected to serve. None. [32012-0805/SB003679677.DOCj -6- 2/14/00 c. Water runoff(including stormwater): 1. Describe the source of runoff(including stormwater) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Stormwater runoff from the new parking areas and new building areas will be collected by a tightlined system, detained and routed through a biofiltration swale, and discharged to the City of Renton underground system in Hoquiam Ave. N.E. 2. Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No. 3. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Stormwater runoff from impervious surfaces will be diverted to a biofiltration swale on site to provide water quality filtration before discharge into the City stormwater system. Stormwater runoff from other areas on the site (e.g., roofs) will enter subsurface detention pipes and tank before discharge into the City stormwater system. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: ✓ deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other ✓ evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other ✓ shrubs ✓ grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulirush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other ✓ other types of vegetation [32012-0805/SB003679677.DOC] -7- 2/14/00 b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Some existing ornamental trees, shrubs, and grass in the areas of new building and parking construction must be removed. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Existing trees will be preserved wherever construction and grading allow. New landscaping will be installed around parking areas and the school building, according to City of Renton standards. Native plant materials will be used where appropriate. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site, or that are known to be on or near the site: Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: crows Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: squirrels Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. All of Western Washington is in the Pacific Flyway; no migratory species are known to use the site. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any. As much of the greenbelt buffer of established trees as possible will be retained. New plantings of native conifers and shrubs will provide an attractive habitat and food source for wildlife. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Natural gas will be added to heat new spaces. Electricity will be used for lighting and cooling. [32012-0805/SB003679677.DOC] -8- 2/14/00 b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: The heating/cooling system will utilize energy-saving devices to reduce energy use, including a new control system and high-efficiency natural gas units. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. Normal hazards of oil and gasoline spills during construction. 1. Describe special emergency services that might be required (for example: chemical spills or explosions). None. 2. Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None. b. Noise 1. What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Normal school bus and automobile noise. 2. What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate the hours that noise would be generated by the site. During construction: normal noise from construction equipment during City-approved work hours. During operation: normal school bus and automobile noise. [32012-0805/SB003679677.DOC] -9- 2/14/00 3. Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: During construction: equipment will be muffled and well- maintained; no equipment will idle longer than 30 minutes. During operation: school bus idling will be kept to a minimum; carpooling and bus ridership will be promoted. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The existing Hazen High School is on the site. The surrounding neighborhood is residential and undeveloped. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Not for more than 30 years. c. Describe any structures on the site. An existing two-story high school building, consisting of a 155,329 s.f. first floor and a 68,977 s.f. second floor. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Residential, R-8. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Residential. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not applicable. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Hazen High School has approximately 100 teachers and staff employees. The school has a capacity for 1,400 students. [32012-0805/SB003679677.DOC] -10- 2/14/00 j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Not applicable. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The high school use and capacity will remain the same as the existing school. The renovated school will serve the same population area. The auditorium was part of the original school building plan, but is only now funded for construction. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether it would be high, middle, or low-income housing. None. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether it would be high, middle, or low-income housing. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas or chimneys? What is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? The tallest roof height will be approximately 38 feet, as approved by variance. The principal exterior building material will be brick veneer to match the existing structure. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: The materials of the new auditorium addition will match the existing building. The design of the new addition is more aesthetically pleasing while fitting with the height and lines of the existing building. The new [32012-0805/SB003679677.DOC] -1 1- 2/14/00 addition will be located in the level change and area reserved in the original school building plans. The new landscaping across the front of the building, as well as a cleaning and refurbishing of the existing facade, will enhance the visual appearance of the entire school building. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Pole parking lot lighting and automobile and bus headlights during the morning arrival and evening departure times. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard, interfere with views, or affect wildlife? No. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Pole parking lot lights will have limited dispersion. The lights are designed to focus lighting down on the parking area only, and the light source is not visible to the surrounding neighborhood. Parking lot landscaping will shield on-site headlights from shining on surrounding residences. 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? The Hazen High School athletic fields are available for public recreational use. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. A separate project, to be completed in the summer of 2000, will enhance the recreational opportunities by upgrading the Hazen athletic fields. [32012-0805/SB003679677.DOC] -12- 2/14/00 c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: The Hazen auditorium addition will be available for community use. A separate project, to be completed in the summer of 2000, will enhance the existing recreational opportunities by upgrading the Hazen athletic fields. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, or eligible for listing fil in national, state, or local preservation registers on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No. 41 b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. Not applicable. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any. None. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The site is served by Hoquiam Ave. N.E. (142"d Ave. S.E.). A school access drive follows the right of way of N.E. 126 Street. The proposed site plan separates bus and student dropoff and parking access points to help mitigate any traffic congestion in adjacent streets. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes. Hazen High School is served by Metro Transit dial-up van service directly to the school (Route 808). c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? The completed project will provide 375 parking spaces (343 full, 24 compact, 8 ADA-accessible), which is 43 more than currently on the site. [3 20 12-0 805/SB003679677.DOC] -13- 2/14/00 d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). As part of the project, both the project frontage on Hoquiam Ave. N.E. and the frontage on the remainder of the Hazen property will be upgraded with curbs and sidewalks, including the frontage of the intervening church property (not owned by the School District). No new road improvements are required by the project. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. See the attached traffic impact analysis. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Separation of school bus and student dropoff and parking lots, including their access to Hoquiam Ave. N.E.; increased parking close to the new auditorium; promotion of carpooling and bus ridership. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools)? If so, generally describe. No. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. The completed school building will be fully equipped with an automatic fire sprinkler system for increased fire protection. A new water service from Water District No. 90 will provide the necessary fire sprinkler water and pressure, while a new water line loop from the City of Renton water system will provide the necessary hydrant flow and redundancy. A new electrical service and transformer will be provided. All other services are existing and are not affected by the project. Easements will be provided to the City for protection and access. All applicable impact fees will be paid. [32012-0805/SB003679677.DOC] -14- 2/14/00 16. Utilities a. Identify existing utilities by name including: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. Electricity: Puget Sound Energy Natural gas: Puget Sound Energy Water: Water District No. 90 Refuse service: Waste Management Telephone: U.S. West Sanitary sewer: City of Renton b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general utility construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Electricity: Puget Sound Energy Natural gas: Puget Sound Energy Water: City of Renton, Water District No. 90 Refuse service: Waste Management Telephone: U.S. West Sanitary sewer: City of Renton Utility construction activities: A new water main loop and new hydrants, including fire sprinkler service; modification of the existing sanitary sewer to service the new auditorium addition; a new site drainage system provided; revised electrical, gas, telephone, and cable television services from existing taps. C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information true and complete. I understand that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Signature: Name Printed: Rick Stracke, Executive Director, Capital Projects Office Date Submitted: February 10, 2000 [32012-0805/5B003679677.DOC] -15- 2/14/00 ROBERT BERNSTEIN, P.E. Consulting Transportation Engineer/Planner R S D 403 JAN 2 4 2000 January 19, 2000 ECEIVE Mr. Tim Watterson CAPITAL PROJECTS Perkins Coie 1201 Third Ave, Ste 4800 Seattle, WA 98101 Subject: Initial Traffic Analysis for Hazen High School Auditorium Addition Dear Mr. Watterson, Per your request, I have prepared an initial analysis of traffic generation and traffic impacts of the proposed Hazen High School Renovation and Auditorium Addition project. This initial traffic analysis had two primary purposes: 1) to determine the traffic generation of the proposed project, and 2) to assess the potential impacts of the project-generated traffic on the street system. In preparing this letter/report, I visited the project site and vicinity, I spoke to City of Renton Planning staff, I met with Lindbergh High School staff and reviewed LHS auditorium schedules, and I spoke to Hazen High School staff(Principal Rich Stubrud). The results of my analyses and my findings/conclusions are reported in this letter. Project Description Hazen High School is located at 1101 Hoquiam Ave NE in Renton. The proposed project comprises several elements: i the addition of a 650-680-seat, 21,300-sfi auditorium; • the addition of a new 10,000-sf commons area within the existing building and courtyard; and • the creation of a new student entryway and the reconfiguration of the staff/visitor parking area and bus loading zone (the number of parking spaces will be increased by 13 spaces to a total of 330). Of the various project elements, only the new auditorium will generate additional traffic. Findings and Conclusions _ 1. The average daily traffic generation of the proposed auditorium is estimated to be 22 — 40 trips per day. 2. The vast majority of auditorium-generated trips will occur during evening and weekend off- peak periods. 1 "sf' = square feet (gross floor area) Robert Bernstein,P.E. Consulting Transportation Engineer/Planner Mr. Tim Watterson January 19, 2000 Page 2 Traffic Generation The primary source for traffic generation information is the nationally-recognized Institute of Transportation Engineers' Trip Generation Manual (TGM). The TGM contains traffic generation rates for a wide range of land use types, which are based on compilations of actual traffic counts collected at sites across the country. The TGM does not have traffic generation rates specifically for high school auditoriums, but it does report overall rates for high schools. These rates are reported in terms of trips per student, trips per school employee, and trips per 1,000 sf of floor area. None of these rates are applicable to the proposed project, however: since the auditorium project does not change student enrollment or school staff level, the trips-per-student and Trips-per-employee rates would give a traffic generation estimate of zero, and the floor-area-based trip rate is based on activity of the entire school and would significantly over-estimate traffic generation. Because the TGM does not provide applicable trip generation rates for the auditorium project, traffic generation estimates were developed using facility usage information for the Lindbergh High School auditorium. (Discussions with the Lindbergh HS auditorium scheduling coordinator, Ms. Nancy Ringis, and Hazen HS Principal Richard Stubrud indicate that use of the new Hazen auditorium — types of uses/users and frequency of use — will be quite similar to the use of the existing Lindbergh auditorium, as compiled in Table 1, attached.) Using the Lindbergh HS auditorium information, it was estimated that during a typical school year, the proposed Hazen HS auditorium will host 10 capacity events generating 500 new trips each, 10 partial-capacity events generating 200 new trips each, and five other meetings generating 200 new trips each. (These "new" trips are trips made by auditorium users for activities that do not currently take place in other rooms/facilities at Hazen HS.) The annual total of 8,000 new trips translates to an average traffic generation rate of 22 new trips per day over the course of a calendar year. (If averaged over the 260 weekdays in a calendar year, the average traffic generation rate would be 31 new trips per day; the average traffic generation rate would be 40 new trips per day if the annual trips are instead averaged over the 200 weekdays in a school year.) The vast majority of auditorium-generated trips will occur during evening and weekend off-peak periods. Rarely if ever will the auditorium generate new trips during the peak hours of traffic on the Renton street system or during the peak hours of student and staff travel to/from the school. Off-Site Street/Traffic Control Improvements The City of Renton generally does not require developments to fund specific off-site improvements; rather the City requires developments to pay a "fair share" of the costs of the street and traffic control improvements included in the City's Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) by paying an "impact fee." The impact fee is based on the daily traffic generated by the proposed development, and is set at $75.00 per daily trip. Robert Bernstein,P.E. Consulting Transportation Engineer/Planner Mr. Tim Watterson January 19,2000 Page 3 E If you have questions or if you need further information, please contact me. Sincerely, Robert Bernstein, P.E. TABLE 1 44 Lindbergh High School Auditorium Use: outside (non-LHS) users and/or after-school use number of events: number of events: ACTIVITY 1997-98 school year 1998-99 school year concert/drama production a) 13 9 drama production rehearsal a) 0 15 non-school group meeting a) 3 1 school organization meeting b) 4 4 student rehearsal/practice b) 6 45 school-related event b) 6 9 award ceremony/banquet b) 7 3 a) these activities would not occur at Lindbergh HS if the auditorium did not exist b)these activities would occur at Lindbergh HS in other rooms if the auditorium did not exist Robert Bernstein,P.E. Consulting Transportation Engineer/Planner L1EVECILOPTY OENTFRENTO PLANNNING FEB 17 2000 RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 403 RECEIVED MITIGATED DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Hazen High School Athletic Fields Improvement Project DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The Hazen High School athletic fields will be upgraded, including (1) complete reconstruction of the soccer field, (2) improvement of the baseball outfield, (3) enhancement of the track surface and edges, (4) irrigation of all fields, (5) drainage improvements on all fields, track, and tennis courts, and (6) installation of fencing around the fields. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Hazen High School, 1101 Hoquiam Ave. N.E., Renton, WA 98059; Tax Parcel Number: U102305-9278. PROJECT PROPONENT: Renton School District No. 403. LEAD AGENCY: Renton School District No. 403. The lead agency for this proposal has determined that the proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This determination assumes compliance with all applicable state and local laws related to general environmental protection. This Determination of Nonsignificance is specifically conditioned on compliance with the conditions and mitigating measures described below. This information is available to the public upon request. CONDITIONS/MITIGATING MEASURES: 1. The Renton School District will require the following construction measures to mitigate any potential adverse impacts of the project during construction: a. An erosion and sediment control plan will be prepared and implemented with best management practices for identifying, reducing, eliminating, or preventing problems on site for preventing stormwater impacts off site. b. Erosion control measures will include filter fences, sediment traps, and rip-rap construction entrance, along with retaining existing paving of the construction access to the fields, and early seeding of the fields by September, 2000. c. Air emission control measures will include water spraying on the site to control dust, street cleaning of affected area streets, well-maintained gasoline and diesel engines, a ban on any burning, and promoting car and truck pooling to reduce vehicle emissions. [32012-0805/SB003680492.DOC] -1- 2/14/00 d. Noise control measures will include: construction equipment will be muffled and well-maintained; no equipment will idle longer than 30 minutes; equipment will be kept away from the site perimeters as much as possible. 2. The Renton School District will prepare and implement a stormwater drainage plan for the soccer field reconstruction that will include subsurface water detention before discharge into the City of Renton stormwater system. 3. The Renton School District will prepare and implement a landscaping plan that will preserve as much of the greenbelt buffer of established trees as possible and will include new landscaping around parking areas for aesthetic and visual separation functions, as well as for habitat and food source for wildlife. 4. The Renton School District will obtain and comply with all applicable permits and approvals for the development and construction of the proposed project. This Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2). The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted to the Responsible Official. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Rick Stracke POSITION/TITLE: Executive Director, Capital Projects Office ADDRESS: 1220 North 4th Street Renton, WA 98055 TELEPHONE: 4 -4470 4x_riciza, SIGNATURE: DATE: Fe ary 18, 2000 [32012-0805/SB003680492.DOC] -2- 2/15/00 RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 403 HAZEN HIGH SCHOOL ATHLETIC FIELDS IMPROVEMENTS ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement(EIS)must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully,to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or"does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems,the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The checklist will be reviewed within 30 days. Delays may occur if you are asked to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impacts. A letter will be sent to you if additional information is needed. Therefore, it is in your interest to provide complete and detailed information the checklist. THE ORIGINAL SIGNED CHECKLIST MUST BE SUBMITTED AT TIME OF APPLICATION [32012-0805/5B003680088.DOC] 2/14/00 State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Hazen High School Athletic Fields Improvements A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project: Hazen High School Athletic Fields Improvements 2. Name of applicant: Renton School District No. 403 3. Mailing address, telephone number of applicant and contact person: Mike Torgerson, Facilities Project Manager 1220 North 4th Street Renton WA 98055 Tel. (425) 204-4471; Fax (425) 204-4476 4. Date checklist reP ared: P February 9, 2000 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton, Department of Ecology 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Construction is scheduled to start in June, 2000, with substantial completion by September, 2000, and full completion by June, 2001. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. A partial remodeling and auditorium addition project for Hazen High School will begin in June, 2000, and be completed in August, 2001. That project has a separate environmental checklist, project application, and permit review. A remodel and renovation of the remainder of the school building is planned for May, 2003 to September, 2004. [32012-0805/SB003680088.DOC] -2- 2/14/00 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Geotechnical Engineering Report by PacRim GeoTechnical, August 2, 1999. Drainage Report by DLR Group, November 16, 1999. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No. The Hazen renovation and addition project does not affect the athletic fields property. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Construction permit. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information or project description.) The Hazen High School athletic fields will be upgraded, including (1) complete reconstruction of the soccer field, (2) improvement of the baseball outfield, (3) enhancement of the track surface and edges, (4) irrigation of the soccer field, (5) drainage improvements on all fields, track, and tennis courts, and (6) completion of fencing around the fields. 12. Location of proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If the proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range of boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Hazen High School, 1101 Hoquiam Ave. N.E., Renton, WA 98059 Tax Parcel Number(s): U102305-9278 Quarter: NE, NW; Section: 10; Township: 23N; Range: 5E [32012-0805/SB003680088.DOC] -3- 2/14/00 B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other: Terraced. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 5.6 percent. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example: clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Glacial till, consisting of recessional outwash, ablation till, and lodgement till. 44, d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Approximately 1,500 cubic yards of local commercial source fill will be placed for the soccer field. Otherwise, on-site cut and fill relocation will be used. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Minor erosion could occur as a result of filling and grading activities. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example: asphalt or buildings)? None. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Erosion control measures will include filter fences, sediment traps, and a gravel construction entrance, in accordance with City of Renton standards. Best management practices will be applied to control erosion and other impacts during construction. [32012-0805/SB003680088.DOC] -4- 2/14/00 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. During construction: normal diesel and gas emissions from construction equipment; dust during earthwork activities. During school operation: None. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: During construction: water spraying on site to control dust, cleaning of access road, ban on any burning. During school operation: promoting staff and student carpooling and bus ridership to reduce vehicle emissions in the area. 3. Water a. Surface: 1. Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, salt water, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state the stream or river into which it flows. No. 2. Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans for this work. No. 3. Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in, or removed from, surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material and/or disposal site. None. [32012-0805/SB003680088.DOCI -5- 2/14/00 4. Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. No. 5. Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. 6. Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. b. Ground: 1. Will groundwater be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities of withdrawals or discharges, if known. No. 2. Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals . . . ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) is/are expected to serve. None. c. Water runoff(including stormwater): 1. Describe the source of runoff(including stormwater) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Stormwater runoff from the athletic fields will be collected and discharged through the existing drainage system, and treated in the new detention tank at the soccer field before discharge into the City of Renton storm sewer system. [32012-0805/SB003680088.DOC] -6- 2/14/00 2. Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No. 3. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Stormwater runoff from the athletic fields will be collected in a detention tank with a control structure for runoff control at the renovated soccer field. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: ✓ deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other ✓ evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other ✓ shrubs ✓ grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulirush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other ✓ other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Some existing trees, shrubs, and grass must be removed in the areas for enlargement of the existing soccer field. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Existing trees, including the undeveloped greenbelt, will be retained except in areas required for field improvements. New landscaping will be provided around parking areas, according to City of Renton standards. Native plant materials will be used where appropriate. [32012-0805/SB003680088.DOC] -7- 2/14/00 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site, or that are known to be on or near the site: Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: crows Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: squirrels Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. All of Western Washington is in the Pacific Flyway; no migratory species are known to use the site. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any. As much of the greenbelt buffer of established trees as possible will be retained. New plantings of native conifers and shrubs will provide an attractive habitat and food source for wildlife. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Not applicable. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Not applicable. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. Normal hazards of oil and gasoline spills during construction. [32012-0805/SB003680088.DOC] -8- 2/14/00 1. Describe special emergency services that might be required (for example: chemical spills or explosions). None. 2. Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None. b. Noise 1. What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Normal school bus and automobile noise. 2. What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate the hours that noise would be generated by the site. During construction: normal noise from construction equipment during City-approved work hours. During operation: normal school field use noise. 3. Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: During construction: equipment will be muffled and well- maintained; no equipment will idle longer than 30 minutes. During operation: none. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The existing Hazen High School building is adjacent to the athletic fields. The surrounding neighborhood is residential and undeveloped. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Not for more than 30 years. c. Describe any structures on the site. None on the athletic fields. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Not applicable. [32 0 1 2-0805/SB003680088.DOC] -9- 2/14/00 e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Residential, R-8. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Residential. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not applicable. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Not applicable. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? Not applicable. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Not applicable. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The improved Hazen athletic fields will be used in the same manner and in mostly the same intensity as the existing fields. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether it would be high, middle, or low-income housing. None. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether it would be high, middle, or low-income housing. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None. [32012-0805/SB003680088.DOC] -10- 2/14/00 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas or chimneys? What is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? A retaining wall will be a maximum of four feet in height. A perimeter fence will be a maximum of six feet in height. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? None. The athletic fields are not artificially lighted and are bordered by an undeveloped greenbelt. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard, interfere with views, or affect wildlife? No. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None. 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? The Hazen High School athletic fields are available for public recreational use. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. The athletic fields will be unavailable for use during the construction period. [32012-0805/SB003680088.DOC] -1 1- 2/14/00 c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: The recreational value of the Hazen athletic fields will be enhanced by the improvement project. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, or eligible for listing in national, state, or local preservation registers on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. Not applicable. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any. None. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The site is served by Hoquiam Ave. N.E. (142nd Ave. S.E.), via a school access drive that follows the right of way of N.E. 12th Street. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes. Hazen High School is served by Metro Transit dial-up van service directly to the school (Route 808). c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? The completed project will have the same number of parking spaces available for field use as currently available. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No. [32012-0805/SB003680088.DOC] -12- 2/14/00 e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. The completed athletic fields project will generate the same number of trips as the existing athletic fields generate. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: None for the athletic fields project. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools)? If so, generally describe. No. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None. 16. Utilities a. Identify existing utilities by name including: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. Electricity: Puget Sound Energy Natural gas: Puget Sound Energy Water: Water District No. 90 Refuse service: Waste Management Telephone: U.S. West Sanitary sewer: City of Renton b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general utility construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Electricity: Puget Sound Energy Natural gas: Puget Sound Energy Water: City of Renton, Water District No. 90 Refuse service: Waste Management Telephone: U.S. West 1 [3 20 1 2-0805/SB003680088.DOCJ -13- 2/14/00 111 Sanitary sewer: City of Renton Utility construction activities: The athletic fields improvement project only upgrades problem areas of the existing athletic fields, thus affecting I only the stormwater drainage lines. The soccer field is the only part of the project which involves full renovation and will include a subsurface stormwater detention tank. Irrigation will be added for all fields, supplied from the water services for the Hazen building. No other utilities are affected by the athletic fields project. III C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information true and complete. I understand that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. , J4— _) Signature: Name Printed: i Rick Stracke, Executive Director, Capital Projects Office Date Submitted: February 10, 2000 1 , I [32012-0805/SB003680088.DOC] -14- 2/14/00 ty ©, CITY F RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department 7 e Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman RE.,Administrator January 28, 2000 Rick Stracke Renton School District Capital Projects Office 1220 North 4th Street Renton, WA 98055 Subject: Land Use Applications for Hazen High School (File No. LUA-99-137) and Tiffany Park Elementary (File No. LUA-99-146) Dear Mr. Stracke: The purpose of this letter is to inform you, as discussed at the January 13, 2000 meeting between the Renton School District and the City of Renton, that the land use applications for the projects referenced above will remain "on hold" until the SEPA process for each has been completed. The administrative decisions currently pending will be made after the completion of the required two-week appeal period for the SEPA Threshold Determination. The Administrative Site Plan Approval will also need to be followed by a two-week appeal period prior to the issuance of any building or construction permits. Your efforts in the permitting process for these two projects have been greatly appreciated. I will be looking forward to another constructive meeting between the School District and the City next week. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me at (425) 430-7270. In addition, any SEPA documentation should be sent to the attention of Jana Hanson, Development Services Director. Sincerely, ii Zct3,7/ /A-1Lesley Nishiha Project Manager cc: Mike Torgerson, Renton School District Lisa Johnson, Hazen Project Contact Michael Grimit, Tiffany Project Contact Yellow Files 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 GPI This naner contains SO%recycled material-20%nest consumer — C i a . :°'.r: ?. •• <,.. CITY vF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator Jesse Tanner,Mayor December 10, 1999 Rick Stracke Executive Director, Facilities and Operations Renton School District No.403, Facilities Planning 1220 North 4th Street Renton,WA 98055 Subject: Hazen High School Renovations File No. LUA-99-137, SA-A,V-B Dear Mr. Stracke: On November 23, 1999, Mike Torgerson submitted documentation of the SEPA process conducted for the above referenced project as requested by the City of Renton. Based on the documentation provided, the appeal periods for the School District's Threshold Determinations of Non-Significance(DNS)issued for the Hazen High School projects, as well as the Tiffany Elementary School project, ended on October 25, 1999. Prior to the information submitted November 23ro,the City had not received any notification of the comment or appeal periods for these projects. Therefore, the City was unable to make necessary comments during the appropriate opportunity. According to WAC 197-11-340(2)(b)and 197-11-340(5)of the SEPA Rules (see attachments), the lead agency is required to send notice of application and notice of the threshold determination issued to"agencies with jurisdiction." We are concerned that the City was not properly notified as required by the SEPA Rules—not only for these project, but also for all of the School District projects within the City's boundaries. We request the School District, as lead agency, conduct the SEPA processes for the Hazen High School Auditorium and Playfield Renovations, as well as the Tiffany Elementary School Renovations, according to the SEPA Rules, and notify the City of Renton as required by law. This will require that the previous DNS be withdrawn and re-issued with the appropriate notification and comment/appeal periods. If you have any questions or have additional information regarding this matter, please contact me or Lesley Nishihira at(425)430-7270. Sincerely, Jana Hanson Development Services Director cc: Delores Gibbons, Renton School District Superintendent Mike Torgerson, Renton School District Tim Watterson, Perkins Coie Gregg Zimmerman, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator Jennifer Henning, Land Use Review Supervisor attachments 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 SEPA Rules (c) Several marginal impacts when considered together WAC 197-11-340 Determination of non-significance may result in a significant adverse impact; (DNS). (1)If the responsible official determines there will be (d) For some proposals, it may be impossible to forecast no probable significant adverse environmental impacts from a the environmental impacts with precision, often because some proposal, the lead agency shall prepare and issue a variables cannot be predicted or values cannot be quantified. determination of nonsignificance (DNS) substantially in the (e)A proposal may to a significant degree: form provided in WAC 197-11-970. If an agency adopts (i) Adversely affect environmentally sensitive or special another environmental document in support of a threshold areas, such as loss or destruction of historic, scientific, and determination(Part Six),the notice of adoption(WAC 197-11- cultural resources, parks, prime farmlands, wetlands, wild and 965)and the DNS shall be combined or attached to each other. scenic rivers,or wilderness; (2)When a DNS is issued for any of the proposals listed in (ii) Adversely affect endangered or threatened species or (2)(a), the requirements in this subsection shall be met. The their habitat; requirements of this subsection do not apply to a DNS issued (iii) Conflict with local, state, or federal laws or when the optional DNS process in WAC 197-11-355 is used. requirements for the protection of the environment;and (a) An agency shall not act upon a proposal for fourteen (iv) Establish a precedent for future actions with days after the date of issuance of a DNS if the proposal significant effects, involves unique and unknown risks to the involves: environment,or may affect public health or safety. (i)Another agency with jurisdiction; (4) If after following WAC 197-11-080 and 197-11-335 (ii)Demolition of any structure or facility not exempted by the lead agency reasonably believes that a proposal may have a WAC 197-11-800(2)(f)or 197-11-880; significant adverse impact,an EIS is required. (iii)Issuance of clearing or grading permits not exempted (5) A threshold determination shall not balance whether in Part Nine of these rules; the beneficial aspects of a proposal outweigh its adverse (iv) A DNS under WAC 197-11-350 (2), (3) or 197-11- impacts,but rather, shall consider whether a proposal has any 360(4); probable significant adverse environmental impacts under the A GMA ction. rules stated in this section. For example,proposals designed to (b) The r nsible official shall send the DNS and improve the environment, such as sewage treatment plants or vironm checklist to agencies with jurisdiction, the pollution control requirements, may also have significant department of ecology, and affected tribes, and each local adverse environmental impacts. agency or political subdivision whose public services would be [Statutory Authority: 1995 c 347 (ESHB 1724) and RCW changed as a result of implementation of the proposal,and chalk 43.21C.110. 97-21-030 (Order 95-16), § 197-11-330, filed give notice under WAC 197-11-510. 10/10/97, effective 11/10/97. Statutory Authority: RCW (c) Any person, affected tribe, or agency may submit 43.21C.110. 84-05-020(Order DE 83-39), § 197-11-330,filed comments to the lead agency within fourteen days of the date 2/10/84,effective 4/4/84.] of issuance of the DNS. (d) The date of issue for the DNS is the date the DNS is WAC 197-11-335 Additional information. The lead sent to the department of ecology and agencies with jurisdiction agency shall make its threshold determination based upon and made publicly available. information reasonably sufficient to evaluate the environmental (e) An agency with jurisdiction may assume lead agency impact of a proposal (WAC 197-11-055(2) and 197-11- status only within this fourteen-day period(WAC 197-11-948). 060(3)). The lead agency may take one or more of the (f)The responsible official shall reconsider the DNS based following actions if, after reviewing the checklist, the agency on timely comments and may retain or modify the DNS or, if the responsible determinessignificant adverse concludes that there is insufficient information to make its official that threshold determination: impacts are likely,withdraw the DNS or supporting documents. (1) Require an applicant to submit more information on When a DNS is modified, the lead agency shall send the subjects in the checklist; modified DNS to agencies with jurisdiction. (2) Make its own further stud including (3)(a)The lead agency shall withdraw a DNS if: y, physical (i) There are substantial changes to a proposal so that the investigations on a proposed site; ro osal is like to have si (3)Consult with other agencies,requesting information on p p y gnificant adverse environmental the proposal's potential impacts which lie within the other impacts; agencies' jurisdiction or expertise (agencies shall respond in (ii)There is significant new information indicating, or on, accordance with WAC 197-11-550);or a proposal's probable significant adverse environmental (4) Decide that all or part of the action or its impacts are impacts;or not sufficiently definite to allow environmental analysis and (iii) The DNS was procured by misrepresentation or lack of material disclosure;if such DNS resulted from the actions of commit to timely, subsequent environmental analysis, an applicant, any subsequent environmental checklist on the consistent with WAC 197-11-055 through 197-11-070. proposal shall be prepared directly by the lead agency or its [Statutory Authority: RCW 43.21 C.110. 84-05-020 (Order consultant at the expense of the applicant. DE 83-39),§ 197-11-335,filed 2/10/84,effective 4/4/84.] WAC(4/15/98) [Ch.197-11 WAC—p.15] SEPA Rules (b)Subsection(3)(a)(ii)shall not apply when a nonexempt [Statutory Authority: RCW 43.21C.110. 84-05-020 (Order license has been issued on a private project. DE 83-39),§ 197-11-350,filed 2/10/84,effective 4/4/84.] (c) If the lead agency withdraws a DNS, the agency shall make a new threshold determination and notify other agencies WAC 197-11-355 Optional DNS process. (1)If a GMA with jurisdiction of the withdrawal and new threshold county/city with an integrated project review process (RCW determination. If a DS is issued, each agency with jurisdiction 36.70B.060)is lead agency for a proposal and has a reasonable shall commence action to suspend, modify, or revoke any basis for determining significant adverse environmental approvals until the necessary environmental review has impacts are unlikely, it may use a single integrated comment occurred(see also WAC 197-11-070). period to obtain comments on the notice of application and the [Statutory Authority: 1995 c 347 (ESHB 1724) and RCW likely threshold determination for the proposal. If this process 43.21C.110. 97-21-030 (Order 95-16), § 197-11-340, filed is used,a second comment period will typically not be required 10/10/97, effective 11/10/97. Statutory Authority: RCW when the DNS is issued(refer to subsection(4)of this section). 43.2IC.110. 95-07-023 (Order 94-22), § 197-11-340, filed (2)If the lead agency uses the optional process specified in 3/6/95, effective 4/6/95; 84-05-020 (Order DE 83-39), § 197- subsection(1)of this section,the lead agency shall: 11-340,filed 2/10/84,effective 4/4/84.] (a)State on the first page of the notice of application that it expects to issue a DNS for the proposal,and that: WAC 197-11-350 Mitigated DNS. The purpose of this (i)The optional DNS process is being used; section is to allow clarifications or changes to a proposal prior (ii) T may be the only opportunity to comment on the to making the threshold determination. environmental impacts of the proposal; (1) In making threshold determinations, an agency may (iii) The proposal may include mitigation measures under consider mitigation measures that the agency or applicant will applicable codes, and the project review process may implement incorporate or require mitigation measures regardless of (2) After submission of an environmental checklist and whether an EIS is prepared;and (iv)A copy of the subsequent threshold determination for prior to the lead agency's threshold determination on a proposal, an applicant may ask the lead agency to indicate the specific proposal may be obtained upon request (in whether it is considering a DS. If the lead agency indicates a addition, the lead agency may choose to maintain a general DS is likely,the applicant may clarify or change features of the mailing list for threshold determination distribution). (b) List in the notice of application the conditions being proposal to mitigate the impacts which led the agency to considered to mitigate environmental impacts, if a mitigated consider a DS likely. The applicant shall revise the environmental checklist as may be necessary to describe the DNS is expected; clarifications or changes. The lead agency shall make its (c) Comply with the requirements for a notice of threshold determination based upon the changed or clarified application and public notice in RCW 36.70B.110;and proposal. If a proposal continues to have a probable significant (d) Send the notice of application and environmental adverse environmental impact, even with mitigation measures, checklist to: an EIS shall be prepared. (i) Agencies with jurisdiction, the department of ecology, (3)Whether or not an applicant requests early notice under affected tribes, and each local agency or political subdivision subsection(2),if the lead agency specifies mitigation measures whose public services would be changed as a result of on an applicant's proposal that would allow it to issue a DNS, implementation of the proposal;and and the proposal is clarified,changed,or conditioned to include (ii) Anyone requesting a copy of the environmental checklist for the specific proposal(in addition, the lead agency those measures,the lead agency shall issue a DNS. (4) Environmental documents need not be revised and may choose to maintain a general mailing list for checklist resubmitted if the clarifications or changes are stated in writing distribution). in documents that are attachments to, or incorporate by (3)If the lead agency indicates on the notice of application that a DNS is likely, an agency with jurisdiction may assume reference, the documents previously submitted. An addendum may be used,see Part Six. lead agency status during the comment period on the notice of (5) Agencies may clarify or change features of their own application(WAC 197-11-948). proposal, and may specify mitigation measures in their DNSs, (4) The responsible official shall consider timely is a result of comments by other agencies or the public or as a comments on the notice of application and either: esult of additional agency planning. (a) Issue a DNS or mitigated DNS with no comment (6) An agency's indication under this section that a DS period using the procedures in subsection(5)of this section; appears likely shall not be construed as a determination of (b)Issue a DNS or mitigated DNS with a comment period significance. Likewise, the preliminary discussion of using the procedures in subsection(5)of this section,if the lead :larifications or changes to a proposal shall not bind the lead agency determines a comment period is necessary; tgency to a mitigated DNS. (c)Issue a DS;or (7) Agencies may specify procedures'for enforcement of (d) Require additional information or studies prior to nitigation measures in their agency SEPA procedures. making a threshold determination. Ch.197-11 WAC—p.16] WAC(4/15/98) • SEPA Rules (5)If a DNS or mitigated DNS is issued under subsection (3)Regardless of any appeals, a DS or DNS issued by the (4)(a) of this rction, the lead agency shall send a copy of the responsible official may be considered final for purposes of DNS or mitigated DNS to the department of ecology, agencies other agencies' planning and decision making unless with jurisdiction, those who commented, and anyone subsequently changed,reversed,or withdrawn. requesting i copy. A copy of the environmental checklist need [Statutory Authority: 1995 c 347 (ESHB 1724) and RCW not be re�uculated. 43.21C.110. 97-21-030 (Order 95-16), § 197-11-390, filed [Sta Cory Authority: 1995 c 347 (ESHB 1724) and RCW 10/10/97, effective 11/10/97. Statutory Authority: RCW . 1C.110. 97-21-030 (Order 95-16), § 197-11-355, filed 43.21C.110. 84-05-020(Order DE 83-39), § 197-11-390, filed 10/10/97,effective 11/10/97.] 2/10/84,effective 4/4/84.] WAC 197-11-360 Determination of sig-nificance PART FOUR-ENVIRONMENTAL (DS)/initiation of scoping. (1) If the responsible official IMPACT STATEMENT(EIS) determines that a proposal may have a probable significant adverse environmental impact, the responsible official shall WAC 197-11-400 Purpose of EIS. (1) The primary prepare and issue a determination of significance (DS) purpose of an environmental impact statement is to ensure that substantially in the form provided in WAC 197-11-980. The SEPA's policies are an integral part of the ongoing programs DS shall describe the main elements of the proposal, the and actions of state and local government. location of the site, if a site-specific proposal, and the main (2)An EIS shall provide impartial discussion of significant areas the lead agency has identified for discussion in the EIS. environmental impacts and shall inform decision makers and A copy of the environmental checklist may be attached. the public of reasonable alternatives, including mitigation (2) If an agency adopts another environmental document measures, that would avoid or minimize adverse impacts or in support of a threshold determination(Part Six),the notice of enhance environmental quality. adoption(WAC 197-11-965)and the DS shall be combined or (3) Environmental impact statements shall be concise, attached to each other. clear, and to the point, and shall be supported by the necessary (3) The responsible official shall put the DS in the lead environmental analysis. The purpose of an EIS is best served agency's file and shall commence scoping(WAC 197-11-408) by short documents containing summaries of, or reference to, by circulating copies of the DS to the applicant, agencies with technical data and by avoiding excessively detailed and overly jurisdiction and expertise, if any, affected tubes, and to the technical information. The volume of an EIS does not bear on public. Notice shall be given under WAC 197-11-510. The its adequacy. Larger documents may even hinder the decision lead agency is not required to scope if the agency is adopting making process. another environmental document for the EIS or is preparing a (4) The EIS process enables government agencies and supplemental EIS. interested citizens to review and comment on proposed (4) If at any time after the issuance of a DS a proposal is government actions, including government approval of private changed so, in the judgment of the lead agency, there are no projects and their environmental effects. This process is probable significant adverse environmental impacts, the DS intended to assist the agencies and applicants to improve their shall be withdrawn and a DNS issued instead. The DNS shall plans and decisions, and to encourage the resolution of be sent to all who commented on the DS. A proposal shall not potential concerns or problems prior to issuing a final be considered changed until all license applications for the statement. An environmental impact statement is more than a proposal are revised to conform to the changes or other binding disclosure document. It shall be used by agency officials in commitments made by agencies or by applicants. conjunction with other relevant materials and considerations to [Statutory Authority: RCW 43.21C.110. 84-05-020 (Order Plan actions and make decisions. • DE 83-39),§ 197-11-360,filed 2/10/84,effective 4/4/84.] [Statutory Authority: RCW 43.21C.110. 84-05-020 (Order DE 83-39),§ 197-11-400,filed 2/10/84,effective 4/4/84.] WAC 197-11-390 Effect of threshold determination. (1) When the responsible official makes a threshold WAC 197-11-402 General requirements. Agencies determination,it is final and binding on all agencies,subject to shall prepare environmental impact statements as follows: the provisions of this section and WAC 197-11-340, 197-11- (1)EISs need analyze only the reasonable alternatives and 360,and Part Six. probable adverse environmental impacts that are significant (2)The responsible official's threshold determination: Beneficial environmental impacts or other impacts may be (a)For proposals listed in WAC 197-11-340(2), shall not discussed. be final until fourteen days after issuance. (2) The level of detail shall be commensurate with the (b) Shall not apply if another agency with jurisdiction importance of the impact, with less important material assumes lead agency status under WAC 197-11-948. summarized,consolidated,or referenced. (c) Shall not apply when withdrawn by the responsible (3) Discussion of insignificant impacts is not required; if official under WAC 197-11-340 or 197-11-360. included, such discussion shall be brief and limited to (d)Shall not apply when reversed on appeal. WAC(4/15/98) [Ch.197-11 WAC—p.17] SEPA Rules summarizing impacts or noting why more study is not Preparation of a SEIS shall be carried out as stated in warranted WAC 197-11-620. (4)Description of the existing environment and the nature • (5)Agencies may use federal EISs,as stated in Part Six. of environmental impacts shall be limited to the affected environment and shall be no longer than is necessary to [Statutory Authority: RCW 43.21C.110. 84-05-020 (Order understand the environmental consequences of the alternatives, DE 83-39),§ 197-11-405,filed 2/10/84,effective 4/4/84.] including the proposal. (5)EISs shall be no longer than necessary to comply with WAC 197-11-406 EIS timing. The lead agency shall first to potential commence preparation of the environmental impact statement SEPA and these rules. Length should relate as close as possible environmental problems and then to the size or complexity of to the time the agency is developing or is presented with a proposal,so that preparation can be completed the alternatives,including the proposal. (6) The basic features and analysis of the proposal, in time for the final statement to be included in appropriate alternatives,and impacts shall be discussed in the EIS and shall recommendations or reports on the proposal (WAC 197-11- be generally understood without turning to other documents; 055). The statement shall be prepared early enough so it can rmation serve practically as an important contribution to the decision however, an EIS is not required to include all info making process and will not be used to rationalize or justify conceivably relevant to a proposal, and may be supplemented by appendices, reports, or other documents in the agency's decisions already made. EISs may be "phased" in appropriate record. situations(WAC 197-11-060(5)). (7)Agencies shall reduce paperwork and the accumulation [Statutory Authority: RCW 43.21C.110. 84-05-020 (Order of background data by adopting or incorporating by reference, DE 83-39),§ 197-11406,filed 2/10/84,effective 4/4/84.] existing, publicly available environmental documents, wherever possible. WAC 197-11-408 Scoping. (1) The lead agency shall (8) Agencies shall prepare EISs concurrently with and narrow the scope of every EIS to the probable significant coordinated with environmental studies and related surveys that adverse impacts and reasonable alternatives, including may be required for the proposal under other laws, when mitigation measures. For example, if there are only two or feasible. three sin (9)The range of alternative courses of action discussed in focused on those. t impacts or alternatives, the EIS shall be EISs shall encompass those to be considered by the decision (2) To ensure that every EIS is concise and addresses the maker. (10) EISs shall serve as the means of assessing the significant environmental issues,the lead agency shall: environmental impact of proposed agency action, rather than the DS Invite a9 -affected tribes, and public comment on justifying decisions already made. (WAC 197ncy-11360). (i) If the agency requires written comments, agencies, Statutory Authority: RCW 43.21C.110. 84-05-020 (Order affected tribes and the public shall be allowed twenty-one days )E 83-39),§ 197-11-402,filed 2/10/84,effective 4/4/84.] from the date of issuance of the DS in which to comment, unless expanded scoping is used. (ii) If a GMA county/city issues the scoping notice with WAC 197-11-405 EIS types. (1) Draft and final nvironmental impact statements(EISs)shall be prepared;draft the notice of application under RCW 36.70B.110,the comment and final supplemental EISs may be prepared. period shall be no less than fourteen days. (2)A draft EIS (DEIS) allows the lead agency to consult (iii)The date of issuance for a DS is the date it is sent to vith members of the public, affected tribes, and agencies with the department of ecology and other agencies with jurisdiction, irisdiction and with expertise. The lead agency shall issue a and is publicly available. )EIS and consider comments as stated in Part Five. (b) Identify reasonable alternatives and probable (3)A final EIS(FEIS)shall revise the DEIS as appropriate significant adverse environmental impacts. rid respond to comments as required in WAC 197-11-560. An (c)Eliminate from detailed study those impacts that are not EIS shall respond to opposing views on significantsignificant. es the (d) Work with other agencies to identify and integrate nvironmental impacts and reasonable alternatives which the g .ad agency determines were not adequately discussed in the environmental studies required for other government approvals lEIS. The lead agency shall issue an FEIS as specified bywi e the EIS,where feasible. SAC 197-11-460. (3) Agencies, affected tribes, and the public should (4) A supplemental EIS (SEIS) shall be prepared as an comment promptly and as specifically as permitted by the idition to either a draft or fmal statement if details available on the proposal. (a)There are substantial changes to a proposal so that the (4)Meetings or scoping documents, including notices that .oposal is likely to have significant adverse environmental the scope has been revised, may be used but are not required. ipacts;or The lead agency shall integrate the scoping process with its (b)There is significant new information indicating, or on, existing planning and decision-malting process in order to proposal's probable significant adverse environmental avoid duplication and delay. ipacts. 'h.197-11 WAC—p.18] WAC(4/15/98) • ` 1- 131 Cy) { CITY OF RENTON , LL ; • Fire Department A.Lee Wheeler,Chief Jesse Tanner,Mayor November 17, 1999 • Mr. Craig Mason • Principal in the Firm DLR Group 900 Fourth Avenue, Suite 700 Seattle, Washington 98164-1006 Subject: Phasing of Construction of Hazen High School Dear Mr. Mason: This letter is in response to your letter to Lesley Nishihara,Associate Planner for the _ City of Renton, concerning your proposal on phasing the fire alarm and fire sprinkler -- systems during the construction and remodel of Hazen High School. Unfortunately,the Renton Fire Department cannot support your request. The Uniform Building and Fire Codes along with our city ordinance are clear in their requirements for the above mentioned systems. There are no provisions for phasing of these basic, minimum life safety systems. We do not feel that it is reasonable to delay the completion of these systems for over two (2)years time frame. The existing fire alarm system concerns us as it is antiquated, and given any major faults probably could not be repaired due to the age of the system. There is also a very high concern for the type of occupancy we are dealing with in this case, which has very high occupancy loads and minors involved. We are very careful in studying proposals such as yours as they tend to set precedence for others to follow. We have,many times in the past,upheld others to the same task we are asking of you. We try our utmost to work with all developers and contractors to coordinate fire system requirements into their buildings and schedules through such things as timely plans review and partial system inspections. We cannot, however waive any requirements of our ordinances. The Renton Fire Department will continue to work with you and the school district to insure that this project proceeds smoothly and reaches all of our goals in a timely manner. If you have any questions concerning this matter,please feel free to contact this office. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Sincerely, S Chuck Duffy Fire Marshal CD/jh . . .., ...__v!__.__ nonce /A'le\A7n 'lnnn /L'A V/A'2G\A'2 '71AA ® 176329 CITY OF RENTG,.. U.S. BANK OF WASHINGTON 19-10/21 AP RENTON BRANCH 1250 PAY $500 DOLLARS AND ZERO CENTS DATE 11/05/99 AMOUNT ********500.00 VOID AFTER 6 MONTHS To THE ORDER OF RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT 1220 N 4TH ST C )/.G RENTON, WA 98134 II' L7632911' 1: L25000L05D: 02L7 05E847(I' VENDOR NO VENDOR NAME CHECK DATE CHECK AMOUNT CHECK NO 600894 RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT 111/05/99 I 500.00 I 0176329 INVOICE I AMOUNT I INVOICE ( AMOUNT SE PA REVIEW 500.00 CITY OF RENTON • 200 MILL AVE S. • RENTON,WASHINGTON 98055 • PHONE(206) 235-2617 • FAX(206)235-2513 DP3111S2/93 _ City of�Renton Finance Department Request for Claims Date of Request f 0/aej/a[G1 Date Required A-SA P Requesting Department P/3/P Authorized Signature REASON FOR CHECK �F PO 'asp (4335 /kUAg41-13'1 Deposit Refund Name 1 E.N-T0N SG.1OD Di;Tpcikmount 451)d D r Finance Receipt No '. ggpq eq3 Receipt Date ef/3V/gl Other r Describe Circumstances Requiring Issuance of Check: A-p-p!i Cltiv►fi I�t S i�COYYCG 1cha,veA >er-v S&PA kC.vi C the SC h oo I r i`51—y)-0f vvflitbt US Lcad CHECK PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS Amount $ 5 0d, rU Charge to Account(s) pip,3. . .t. oo. 0490'1 /EN'V. REV. Payable To RE+, SG1100 DISTRI (0(0E/6 Address E % RSA PO 41- 11433S 1 1?,0 NOR-rH 4+4.- ST fl Mail Check to Payee 12-tF 14-1-O N, VvA 9S I i5t- �,1;Svl`�`I N I S H r H rf a/ Return to Dept: P EA)• S EAQV . X7a 4 Plr31 PW Soc Sec or IRS ID No Ei Other: CHECK AUTHORIZATION - Finance Department Use Only Approved Date El Claims Check No: CTY006/7/89 CITY OF RENTON BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT PUBLIC HEARING MINUTES OCTOBER 27, 1999 The following minutes are a summary of the October 27, 1999 hearing. The legal record is recorded on tape. CALL TO ORDER Boardmember Wallace led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and called the meeting of the Board of Adjustment to order. ROLL CALL OF BOARDMEMBERS Jay Wallace; Ralph Evans; Greg Guillen, George Feighner. Motion made and passed to excuse Boardmembers Jolly, Jim Jacques, and Briere CITY STAFF IN ATTENDANCE Lesley Nishihira, Project Manager; Karen Codiga, Recording Secretary. APPROVAL OF Moved by Evans, seconded by Guillen, Board approves the minutes of MINUTES June 23, 1999 as presented. Carried. PUBLIC HEARING This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in accordance with local and State laws, Boardmember Wallace opened the public hearing to consider the Hazen High School Variance (LUA-99-137, SA-A,V). Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing the original Exhibit No. 2: Site Vicinity Map application, proof of posting, proof of publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No. 3: Proposed Site Plan Map Exhibit No. 4: Elevation Map Project Description 1. Background/Project Description The Renton School District is proposing to perform renovations to Hazen High School, located in the Residential — 8 dwelling units per acre (R-8) zone. A major component of the renovation includes the addition of an auditorium to the southeast corner of the existing building. The proposed height of the auditorium addition, at 38 feet, is the subject of the variance request. Section 4-2-110A of the City's Development Regulations restricts building height in the R-8 zone to 30 feet and 2-stories. In order to provide the existing school with an on-site auditorium facility, the applicant is seeking a variance to exceed the height limitation by 8 feet. The proposed auditorium addition would have a 19,500 square foot first floor (of which 17,400 square feet is new construction) and a 1,829 square foot second floor—for a total auditorium area of 21,329 square feet. The auditorium would be designed to accommodate approximately 650 to 680 seats. The proposed building footprint would have a setback of 40 feet from the nearest property line (Hoquiam Avenue NE on the site's eastern boundary). There would be an additional Board of Adjustment Minutes October 27, 1999 Page 2 setback of 16 feet(a 56-foot total)from this property line for the portions of the building proposed to exceed the height limitation. Pursuant to the definitions contained in section 4-11-020, building height is measured from the average finished grade to the highest point of the coping of a flat roof. In addition to the requested variance, the proposal requires Administrative Site Plan Review and Environmental (SEPA) Review. The remainder of the proposed renovations would be reviewed under the Administrative Site Plan portion of the land use application. In addition to the auditorium, the renovation project includes the creation of a commons area within an existing courtyard, the remodeling of the administrative wing of the building, and the development of a new student entry plaza. The project also includes the reconfiguration of parking areas, revisions to landscaping, and street improvements to Hoquiam Avenue NE. The administrative review of the project will be conducted after the completion of the SEPA process, of which the Renton School District is serving as lead agency. Variance Criteria 1. City Code section 4-7-22.G.3 states the conditions under which a variance may be granted. Those conditions are listed below with discussion following each of the variance criteria. A. That the applicant suffers undue hardship and the variance is necessary because of special circumstances applicable to subject property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings of the subject property, and the strict application of the Zoning Code is found to deprive subject property owner of rights and privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity and under identical zone classification: The applicant maintains the development of an auditorium is essential for the continuing use of the property as a secondary school. Currently, the existing high school lacks the facilities necessary for large event functions and is forced to either utilize the gymnasium or hold events off-site. While the development of an auditorium would alleviate this hardship, the applicant contends the height limitation of the R-8 zone precludes the construction of such an addition. In order to accommodate the fundamental aspects of the auditorium use, a minimum height of 38 feet would be necessary for the proper function of the stage and seating areas. Without the essential overhead space, the stage lighting, sets, props, and other necessary equipment would not function properly and would possibly interfere with performance activities. The applicant also maintains that the strict interpretation of the zoning code would deprive them of the right to expand an existing secondary school in a manner that is necessary for the campus. In addition, the location of the secondary school within the R-8 zoning designation can be seen as special circumstances applicable only to the subject site. While the height limitation of the zone is clearly applicable to residential development, the standard is not appropriate for campus or school development. B. That the granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which subject property is situated: The applicant contends that potential impacts that would result from the proposed addition would be minimal to surrounding properties in the vicinity of the subject site, especially when considering the existing building as well as the location and design of the addition. The footprint of the auditorium addition would have an approximate setback of 40 feet from the nearest property line (Hoquiam Avenue NE). The portions of the building proposed to exceed the 30-foot height limitation would have an even greater setback from this street frontage (approximately 56 feet). In addition, the applicant has stated that"much care has gone into coordinating the massing of the new addition with the existing building so that it Board of Adjustment Minutes October 27, 1999 Page 3 ties into the existing school in mass and material." Since portions of the existing building currently exceed the 30-foot height maximum, the addition would not be out of proportion to the existing buildings. Although the addition would intensify the building mass along the site's eastern boundary, the development would be sufficiently setback and appropriately designed to reduce avoid adverse visual impacts to adjacent properties. Furthermore, the approval of the variance would not set a precedent for the residential development in the surrounding area and R-8 zoning designation. Therefore, the granting of the variance would not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is situated. C. That approval shall not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is situated: The properties in the vicinity of the subject site which are designated R-8 are mostly developed with single family residences. By virtue of student populations, the location of secondary schools are distributed in a regional manner. Therefore, there are no other uses within this area that would be able to justify the need for a 680-seat auditorium with a building height of 38 feet. Because the granting of the variance would not be applicable to residential development, it would not be considered a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is situated. D. That the approval as determined by the Board of Adjustment is a minimum variance that will accomplish the desired purpose: The applicant maintains that the requested 38-foot height is the minimum height under which the auditorium stage and seating functions could be accommodated. The applicant further contends that the additional 8 feet in height is proposed only for the portions of the addition where it is absolutely necessary for the required auditorium functions and would be applied only to the parapet area of the building above the stage and seating areas. Therefore, the approval of the variance would be the minimal variance necessary for the addition of an auditorium to the existing high school campus. AUDIENCE COMMENT/TESTIMONY: Boardmember Wallace asked for testimony from those in favor of the application: Mr. Craig Mason DLR Group 3100 E. Jefferson Seattle, WA Mr. Mason briefly reviewed the proposed variance and stated that the 38-foot portion of the building is over only the stage portion of the proposed auditorium. The height is required over the stage area for cables, lights, etc. Mr. Jack Connell Renton School District Facilities Manager 1220 North 4th St. Renton, WA Board of Adjustment Minutes October 27, 1999 Page 4 Mr. Connell voiced the Renton School District support of this project. Boardmember Wallace asked for testimony from those opposed to the application: There was no opposition. Boardmember Wallace called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. The public hearing was closed. DECISION: It was moved by BOARDMEMBER Feighner and seconded by BOARDMEMBER Guillen to approve the variance as requested for LUA-99-137,SA-A,V, based on the attached findings of fact and conclusions. ROLL CALL VOTE: Wallace -yes; Evans - yes; Guillen -yes; Feighner—yes. BOARDMEMBER WALLACE STATED: The variance is hereby granted as proposed and outlined in the findings of fact and conclusions. DATED this 27th day of October 1999. An appeal of the Board of Adjustment decision is governed by Title IV, Chapter 36, Section I, which requires that such appeal be filed with the Superior Court of Washington for King County within 21 days from the date of issuance of the decision. The land use decision is considered issued three (3) days after the City mails a written decision. The appeal period for this variance will end at 5:00 PM on November 21, 1999. PUBLIC HEARING This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in accordance with local and State laws, Boardmember Wallace opened the public hearing to consider the Normandy Ridge Variance (LUA-99-136, SA-A,V,ECF). Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing the original Exhibit No. 2: Site Vicinity Map application, proof of posting, proof of publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No. 3: Proposed Site Plan Map Exhibit No. 4: Elevation Map Project Description 1. Environmental Review and Administrative Land Use Approval The proposal requires SEPA environmental review and administrative site plan review in addition to the requested variance. These permit reviews will be conducted subsequent to the subject variance. Board of Adjustment Minutes October 27, 1999 Page 5 2. Variance Requested The applicant requests a variance from the Tree Cutting and Land Clearing Regulations to allow (2) street crossings to intrude into the required stream buffer. Section 4-4-130.C.4. restricts tree cutting and land clearing within twenty-five (25) feet of the ordinary high water mark of creeks. The site plan provides for the 25-foot wide buffer from the stream except for the two (2) road crossings. The westerly stream crossing occurs at the entry driveway to the proposed development off Talbot Road S. The second stream crossing is for the internal loop road and is located at the east end of the property. There was some question initially whether the drainage ditch on the site was considered a stream subject to the City's regulations. A wetlands evaluation and stream buffer report was prepared for the subject property by Habitat Technologies (report dated September 22, 1999). The report concludes that the drainage ditch on the site meets criteria for a stream and therefore is subject to the Tree Cutting and Land Clearing Regulations. The following description of the drainage ditch/stream is summarized from the report. The stream or drainage corridor on the site is an excavated ditch that flows through the center of the site in an east to west direction. The drainage ditch was excavated to convey overflow from a spring located at the toe of the slope along the east project site boundary. Flows from the ditch are released into the roadside ditch along Talbot Road S. Because the excavated ditch conveys "naturally occurring surface water" from the spring, it meets the criteria for designation as a stream. In addition, this stream meets the criteria for designation as a Washington Department of Natural Resources (WDNR)Type 5 Water(i.e. it does not provide direct habitat for fish and is less than 2 feet in width at the ordinary high water mark). The importance of this stream is in the protection of downstream aquatic resources and local water quality. On August 11, 1999 Mr. Philip Schneider, Area Habitat Biologist for the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife visited the project site. Mr. Schneider concluded that the excavated ditch would be considered a stream for purposes of site development. Any proposed work within the ordinary high water mark of this stream would require a Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA), approved by the Department of Fish and Wildlife. For approval of a HPA, the applicant would need to demonstrate that the proposed road crossing(s) is the only reasonable location for the crossing in terms of public safety and local engineering requirements. It will also be important to show that the method of crossing and the overall impact of any fill placed waterward of the ordinary high water mark is the minimum necessary to complete the project. Typically a crossing of this type of stream (i.e. intermittent and without direct fish habitat) can be completed using an oversized arch culvert. The site plan preserves the required 25-foot wide stream buffer except for the two road crossings. To compensate for the two proposed stream crossings, the applicant is proposing restoration and enhancement of the stream buffer. The applicant proposes to plant native species in buffer areas disturbed by the road crossings. The plantings would increase plant community diversity and complexity within the stream corridors adjacent to the new crossings. Variance Criteria: 1. That the applicant suffers undue hardship and the variance is necessary because of special circumstances applicable to subject property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings of the subject property, and the strict application of the Zoning Code is found to deprive subject property owner of rights and privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity and under identical zone classification: The drainage ditch/stream runs east to west through the center of the entire site. Development of the site would be severely compromised if the stream crossings were not allowed. The stream is therefore a special circumstance or condition of the subject property and the strict application of the Zoning Code Board of Adjustment Minutes October 27, 1999 Page 6 would deprive the property owner of development potential and rights and privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity and under the identical zoning classification. The project applicant has provided the following justification for the current road design: 1. The road forms a loop around the site and provides two separate access directions to each building, as desired/required by the Fire Marshal. Adequate and open site access to all buildings is a life safety issue,which has been addressed through the provision of this loop road. 2. The westerly stream crossing occurs at the development entry driveway along Talbot Road. This driveway is located directly across from the driveway serving the residential development on the west side of Talbot now under construction and is located to minimize traffic conflicts. Two separate driveways, each serving a separate segment of the site was not desired since the two new driveways would have been offset from the drive across Talbot approximately 100 feet or slightly more. These new driveways would have adversely effected the safe and smooth traffic flow in this area along Talbot Road, by increasing the number of driveways with driveway separation only slightly more than the minimum allowed. 3. The loop road provides safe on-site access to the common Recreation facility located in the northern site segment. Given the steep grade of the site, barrier free access to the Recreation Facility is provided by individual cars using the loop road. If this road were not available, residents would be required to access different parts of the site via Talbot Road,which would contribute to the congestion along Talbot Road. 4. The easterly stream crossing is not a true crossing and occurs at a poorly defined section between different stream segments. The crossing is located to minimize disruption of the existing stream and stream buffers. 5. Springbrook (Glacier Creek Apartments), located on the west side of Talbot Road,just south of this development was allowed a similar type road crossing across a small stream. The Zoning and use of the Springbrook property is identical to the zoning and use of this property. 2. That the granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which subject property is situated: The proposed road crossings would cross a stream that is actually a manmade drainage channel that directs seepage from a hillside spring across the site to a drainage ditch along Talbot Road S. on the west site boundary. The stream does not provide direct habitat for fish, so the installation of oversized culverts at the road crossings would not be materially detrimental to the stream habitat. Stormwater drainage from the roadway would be collected and routed to an on-site detention and water quality facility, avoiding direct discharge to the stream. The existing plant community along the stream is dominated by Himalayan Blackberries which has low value for habitat. The applicant's proposal to restore disturbed areas with native plantings would improve habitat values. The granting of a variance would not be detrimental or injurious to the subject site, to public welfare, or to property or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That approval shall not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is situated: Road crossings of minor stream tributaries are common in developments with stream/drainage features, especially with requirements for traffic control and fire safety access needs (i.e. life safety issues). Board of Adjustment Minutes October 27, 1999 Page 7 Springbrook (Glacier Creek Apartments) located on the west side of Talbot Road, just south of the proposed development, was allowed a similar type road crossing. The City has approved stream crossings where it is necessary to provide adequate access and a crossing is the most viable alternative to develop a site. Therefore, the approval of a variance for the subject proposal would not constitute a grant of special privilege that is inconsistent with limitations on other uses and properties in the vicinity or zone in which the subject property is located. 4. That the approval as determined by the Board of Adjustment is a minimum variance that will accomplish the desired purpose: The two proposed stream crossings are the minimum number required to provide necessary access through the site. One of the crossings occurs at the entry driveway which is located to be aligned with the driveway serving the residential development on the west side of Talbot Road S. The easterly crossing may not be considered a true crossing as it is located at a poorly defined section between two stream segments. The two stream crossings have been located to minimize impacts to the existing stream habitat. Approval of the variance would be a minimal variance from code standards for the applicant to achieve their desired purpose of developing the subject site. Boardmember Wallace asked for testimony from those in favor of the application: There was no one wishing to speak. Boardmember Wallace asked for testimony from those opposed to the application: There was no opposition. Boardmember Wallace called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. The public hearing was closed. DECISION: It was moved by BOARDMEMBER Evans and seconded by BOARDMEMBER Feighner to approve the variance as requested for LUA-99-136,SA-A,V,ECF based on the attached findings of fact and conclusions. ROLL CALL VOTE: Wallace -yes; Evans -yes; Guillen -yes; Feighner—yes. BOARDMEMBER WALLACE STATED: The variance is hereby granted as proposed and outlined in the findings of fact and conclusions. DATED this 27th day of October 1999. An appeal of the Board of Adjustment decision is governed by Title IV, Chapter 36, Section I, which requires that such appeal be filed with the Superior Court of Washington for King County within 21 days from the date of issuance of the decision. The land use decision is considered issued three (3) days after the City mails a written decision. The appeal period for this variance will end at 5:00 PM on November 21, 1999. Board of Adjustment Minutes October 27, 1999 Page 8 6. OLD BUSINESS: None 7. NEW BUSINESS: None 8. ANNOUNCEMENTS: None 9. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business, it was moved and seconded to adjourn. Meeting adjourned. ; -(N) J Wallace Actind Chairperson BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF RENTON In Re: Normandy Ridge Variance No. LUA-99-136, SA-A,V-B, ECF FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The applicant requests a variance from the Tree Cutting and Land Clearing Regulations to allow (2) street crossings to intrude into the required stream buffer. Section 4-4-130.C.4. restricts tree cutting and land clearing within twenty-five (25) feet of the ordinary high water mark of creeks. The site plan provides for the 25-foot wide buffer from the stream except for the two (2) road crossings. The westerly stream crossing occurs at the entry driveway to the proposed development off Talbot Road S. The second stream crossing is for the internal loop road and is located at the east end of the property. 2. The stream or drainage corridor on the site is an excavated ditch that flows through the center of the site in an east to west direction. The drainage ditch was excavated to convey overflow from a spring located at the toe of the slope along the east project site boundary. Flows from the ditch are released into the roadside ditch along Talbot Road S. Because the excavated ditch conveys "naturally occurring surface water" from the spring, it meets the criteria for designation as a stream. In addition, this stream meets the criteria for designation as a Washington Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) Type 5 Water (i.e. it does not provide direct habitat for fish and is less than 2 feet in width at the ordinary high water mark). The importance of this stream is in the protection of downstream aquatic resources and local water quality. 3. On August 11, 1999 Mr. Philip Schneider, Area Habitat Biologist for the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife visited the project site. Mr. Schneider concluded that the excavated ditch would be considered a stream for purposes of site development. Any proposed work within the ordinary high water mark of this stream would require a Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA), approved by the Department of Fish and Wildlife. For approval of a HPA, the applicant would need to demonstrate that the proposed road crossing(s) is the only reasonable location for the crossing in terms of public safety and local engineering requirements. It will also be important to show that the method of crossing and the overall impact of any fill placed waterward of the ordinary high water mark is the minimum necessary to complete the project. Typically a crossing of this type of stream (i.e. intermittent and without direct fish habitat) can be completed using an oversized arch culvert. 4. The site plan preserves the required 25-foot wide stream buffer except for the two road crossings. To compensate for the two proposed stream crossings, the applicant is proposing restoration and enhancement of the stream buffer. The applicant proposes to plant native species in buffer areas disturbed by the road crossings. The plantings would increase plant community diversity and complexity within the stream corridors adjacent to the new crossings. CONCLUSIONS: FROM THESE FINDINGS OF FACT, THE BOARD MAKES THE FOLLOWING CONCLUSIONS: Development Regulations Section 4-9-250.B.5. — The Reviewing Official shall have authority to grant a variance upon making a determination in writing that the conditions specified below have been found to exist: 1) That the applicant suffers undue hardship and the variance is necessary because of special circumstances applicable to subject property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings of the subject property, and the strict application of the Zoning Code is found to decision,rindings.doc deprive subject property owner of rights and privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity and under identical zone classification: The drainage ditch/stream runs east to west through the center of the entire site. Development of the site would be severely compromised if the stream crossings were not allowed. The stream is therefore a special circumstance or condition of the subject property and the strict application of the Zoning Code would deprive the property owner of development potential and rights and privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity and under the identical zoning classification. The project applicant has provided the following justification for the current road design: 1 The road forms a loop around the site and provides two separate access directions to each building, as desired/required by the Fire Marshal. Adequate and open site access to all buildings is a life safety issue, which has been addressed through the provision of this loop road. 2 The westerly stream crossing occurs at the development entry driveway along Talbot Road. This driveway is located directly across from the driveway serving the residential development on the west side of Talbot now under construction and is located to minimize traffic conflicts. Two separate driveways, each serving a separate segment of the site was not desired since the two new driveways would have been offset from the drive across Talbot approximately 100 feet or slightly more. These new driveways would have adversely effected the safe and smooth traffic flow in this area along Talbot Road, by increasing the number of driveways with driveway separation only slightly more than the minimum allowed. 3 The loop road provides safe on-site access to the common Recreation facility located in the northern site segment. Given the steep grade of the site, barrier free access to the Recreation Facility is provided by individual cars using the loop road. If this road were not available, residents would be required to access different parts of the site via Talbot Road, which would contribute to the congestion along Talbot Road. 4 The easterly stream crossing is not a true crossing and occurs at a poorly defined section between different stream segments. The crossing is located to minimize disruption of the existing stream and stream buffers. 5 Springbrook (Glacier Creek Apartments), located on the west side of Talbot Road,just south of this development was allowed a similar type road crossing across a small stream. The Zoning and use of the Springbrook property is identical to the zoning and use of this property. 2) That the granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which subject property is situated: The proposed road crossings would cross a stream that is actually a manmade drainage channel that directs seepage from a hillside spring across the site to a drainage ditch along Talbot Road S. on the west site boundary. The stream does not provide direct habitat for fish, so the installation of oversized culverts at the road crossings would not be materially detrimental to the stream habitat. Stormwater drainage from the roadway would be collected and routed to an on-site detention and water quality facility, avoiding direct discharge to the stream. The existing plant community along the stream is dominated by Himalayan Blackberries which has low value for habitat. The applicant's proposal to restore disturbed areas with native plantings would improve habitat values. The granting of a variance would not be detrimental or injurious to the subject site, to public welfare, or to property or improvements in the vicinity. 3) That approval shall not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is situated: Road crossings of minor stream tributaries are common in developments with stream/drainage features, especially with requirements for traffic control and fire safety access needs (i.e. life safety issues). Springbrook (Glacier Creek Apartments) located on the west side of Talbot Road, just south of the proposed development, was allowed a similar type road crossing. The City has approved stream crossings decision,findings.doc where it is necessary to provide adequate access and a crossing is the most viable alternative to develop a site. Therefore, the approval of a variance for the subject proposal would not constitute a grant of special privilege that is inconsistent with limitations on other uses and properties in the vicinity or zone in which the subject property is located. 4) That the approval as determined by the Board of Adjustment is a minimum variance that will accomplish the desired purpose: The two proposed stream crossings are the minimum number required to provide necessary access through the site. One of the crossings occurs at the entry driveway which is located to be aligned with the driveway serving the residential development on the west side of Talbot Road S. The easterly crossing may not be considered a true crossing as it is located at a poorly defined section between two stream segments. The two stream crossings have been located to minimize impacts to the existing stream habitat. Approval of the variance would be a minimal variance from code standards for the applicant to achieve their desired purpose of developing the subject site. DECISION: FROM THE FOREGOING FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS, THE BOARD ENTERS THE FOLLOWING DECISION: 1. The variance is hereby granted from the City of Renton Development Regulations Section 4-9-250.B.5. to allow (2) street crossings to intrude into the required stream buffer. The variance approval is contingent upon approval of the submitted site plan. DATED this 27th day of October, 1999. An appeal of the Board of Adjustment decision is governed by Title IV, Chapter 36, Section I, which requires that such appeal be filed with the Superior Court of Washington for King County within 21 days from the date of issuance of the decision. The land use decision is considered issued three (3) days after a written decision is mailed by the City. The appeal period for this variance will end at 5:00 PM on November 21, 1999. t itt-a .1- 54 _ f C Greg i en George Feighnee i� Teri Briere Jim Jacques ce_ - (A"------- 7419Sea J WIIlace Jim Jolly zt Ralp ans (* ---/''- --H.— decision,findings.doc BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF RENTON In Re: Hazen High School Auditorium Height Variance File No. LUA-99-137, SA-A,V-B FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The Renton School District is proposing to perform renovations to Hazen High School, located in the Residential — 8 dwelling units per acre (R-8) zone. The renovations include the addition of a 21,239 square foot auditorium at the southeast corner of the existing building. 2. The applicant is requesting a variance from section 4-2-110A of the City's Development Regulations, which restrict building height in the R-8 zone to 30 feet and 2-stories. The proposed auditorium addition would have a height of 38 feet, 8 feet greater than the maximum permitted height, only where necessitated by the function of the building. 3. The proposed building footprint would have a setback of 40 feet from the nearest property line (Hoquiam Avenue NE on the site's eastern boundary). There would be an additional setback of 16 feet (a 56-foot total) from this property line for the portions of the building proposed to exceed the height limitation. 4. Pursuant to the definitions contained in section 4-11-020, building height is measured from the average finished grade to the highest point of the coping of a flat roof. 5. In addition to the requested variance, the approval of the Administrative Site Plan and the completion of the Environmental (SEPA) Review portions of the land use application are necessary. CONCLUSIONS: FROM THESE FINDINGS OF FACT, THE BOARD MAKES THE FOLLOWING CONCLUSIONS: 1. City Code section 4-9-250B5 states the conditions under which a variance may be granted. Those conditions are listed below with discussion following about each variance. A. That the applicant suffers undue hardship and the variance is necessary because of special circumstances applicable to subject property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings of the subject property, and the strict application of the Zoning Code is found to deprive subject property owner of rights and privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity and under identical zone classification: The applicant maintains the development of an auditorium is essential for the continuing use of the property as a secondary school. Currently, the existing high school lacks the facilities necessary for large event functions and is forced to either utilize the gymnasium or hold events off-site. While the development of an auditorium would alleviate this hardship, the applicant contends the height limitation of the R-8 zone precludes the construction of such an addition. In order to accommodate the fundamental aspects of the auditorium use, a minimum height of 38 feet would be necessary for the proper function of the stage and seating areas. Without the essential overhead space, the stage lighting, sets, props, and other necessary equipment would not function properly and would possibly interfere with performance activities. The applicant also maintains that the strict interpretation of the zoning code would deprive them of the right to expand an existing secondary school in a manner that is necessary for the campus. In addition, the location of the secondary school within the R-8 zoning designation can be seen as special circumstances applicable only to the subject site. While the height limitation of the zone is clearly applicable to residential development, the standard is not appropriate for campus or school development. B. That the granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which subject property is situated: The applicant contends that potential impacts that would result from the proposed addition would be minimal to surrounding properties in the vicinity of the subject site, especially when considering the existing building as well as the location and design of the addition. The footprint of the auditorium addition would have an approximate setback of 40 feet from the nearest property line (Hoquiam Avenue NE). The portions of the building proposed to exceed the 30-foot height limitation would have an even greater setback from this street frontage (approximately 56 feet). In addition, the applicant has stated that"much care has gone into coordinating the massing of the new addition with the existing building so that it ties into the existing school in mass and material." Since portions of the existing building currently exceed the 30-foot height maximum, the addition would not be out of proportion to the existing buildings. Although the addition would intensify the building mass along the site's eastern boundary, the development would be sufficiently setback and appropriately designed to reduce avoid adverse visual impacts to adjacent properties. Furthermore, the approval of the variance would not set a precedent for the residential development in the surrounding area and R-8 zoning designation. Therefore, the granting of the variance would not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is situated. C. That approval shall not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is situated: The properties in the vicinity of the subject site which are designated R-8 are mostly developed with single family residences. By virtue of student populations, the location of secondary schools are distributed in a regional manner. Therefore, there are no other uses within this area that would be able to justify the need for a 680-seat auditorium with a building height of 38 feet. Because the granting of the variance would not be applicable to residential development, it would not be considered a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is situated. D. That the approval as determined by the Board of Adjustment is a minimum variance that will accomplish the desired purpose: The applicant maintains that the requested 38-foot height is the minimum height under which the auditorium stage and seating functions could be accommodated. The applicant further contends that the additional 8 feet in height is proposed only for the portions of the addition where it is absolutely necessary for the required auditorium functions and would be applied only to the parapet area of the building above the stage and seating areas. Therefore, the approval of the variance would be the minimal variance necessary for the addition of an auditorium to the existing high school campus. DECISION: FROM THE FOREGOING FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS, THE BOARD ENTERS THE FOLLOWING DECISION: 1. The variance is hereby granted from the Development Regulations, section 4-2-110A of the City of Renton Development Regulations, allowing the proposed auditorium addition for Hazen High School at a height of 38 feet. The Variance approval is contingent upon the approval of the Administrative Site Plan portion of the land use application. DATED this 27th day of October, 1999. An appeal of the Board of Adjustment decision is governed by Title IV, Chapter 36, Section I, which requires that such appeal be filed with the Superior Court of Washington for King County within 21 days from the date of issuance of the decision. The land use decision is considered issued three (3)days after a written decision is mailed by the City. The appeal period for this variance will end at 5:00 PM on November 21, 1999. . ""\. C. UuliGir—) reg u Ile George Feigh er 4— 2 n4— Teri Briere Jim Jacques c G�1 � J yVallace 4b -- m Jolly /./11,_z ,..,,,- Ralph ans I •• • CITY w_lF RENTON �r r ..LL planning�RiiiltlinQl_P_»hlir Wnrkc DPnartmPnt Jesse Tanner,Mayor Z 433 709 838 US Postal Service Receipt for Certified Mail October 28, 1999 No Insurance Coverage Provided. Do not use for International Mail(See reverse) CERTIFIED MAIL NO. Z 433 709 828 scpLR. Le___frzz,er Skee & u_beS //, i lie os ice,Sta P Code J9 // L 54 Postage $ Certified Fee Special Delivery Fee Ms. Lisa Johnson Restricted Delivery Fee DLR Group rn Return Receipt Showing to 900 Fourth Avenue, Suite 700 Whom&Date Delivered a Return Receipt Showing to Whom, Seattle, WA 98164 < Date,&Addressee's Address 0 TOTAL Postage&Fees $ SUBJECT: Hazen High School Renovation/Addition co Project No. LUA-99-137,SA-A,V-B E Postmark or Date Dear Ms. Johnson: ��-- The Renton Board of Adjustment, at its regular meeting on October 27, 1999, granted your request for a variance from City of Renton Development Regulations, Section 4-2-110A, allowing the proposed auditorium addition for Hazen High School at a height of 38 feet. The Variance approval is contingent upon the approval of the Administrative Site Plan portion of the land use application This is the only variance granted under this application and all other provisions of the Renton Municipal Code will apply. An Appeal of the Board's decision is governed by Title IV, Chapter 36, Section I, which requires that such appeal be filed with the Superior Court of Washington for King County within twenty one (21) days from the date of issuance of the decision. The date on which a land use decision is issued is considered to be three days after a written decision is mailed by the City. The Board of Adjustment decision will become final on November 21, 1999, 5:00 PM, if the decision is not appealed to Superior Court. If you have any questions, please contact me at(425)430-7270. For the Renton Board of Adjustment, Zif-4,(34 Lesley Nishihira +- Project Manager cc: Renton School District No.403/Owners BOAGRAJJT 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, Washington 98055 , 1 • • SENDER: I also wish to receive the follow- iA ❑Complete items 1 and/or 2 for additional services. ing services(for an extra fee): a) Complete items 3,4a,and 4b. E 0 Print your name and address on the reverse of this form so that card to you. 1. ❑Addressee's Addressat we can return this a) ` o Attach this form to the front of the mailpiece,or on the back if space does not • permit. 2. 0 Restricted Delivery r C Write'Return Receipt Requested'on the mailpiece below the article number. e 0 The Return Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered and the date ►� O delivered. a / 3.Article Addressed to: 4a.Article Number E. q3 3709 ���' cc E Ms. Lisa Johnson 4b.ServiceType u DLR Group $.Registered ❑Certified cc 900 Fourth Ave. , Suite 700 0 Express Mail 0 Insured c Seattle, WA 98164 0 Return Receipt for Merchandise El COD a 7.Date of Delivery Z OCT 2.9 1999 w Rece' ed By: (Print Name) 8.Addressee's Address(Only if requested and c cc fee is paid) co 6. narCiTp, dd isV!§rau�lgoe,y) i- 0 v/W� �'/I�VWPt�6jf` N orm 3811,December 1994 102595-9943-0223 Domestic Return Receipt ti ..4 • BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF RENTON In Re: Hazen High School Auditorium Height Variance File No. LUA-99-137, SA-A, V-B FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The Renton School District is proposing to perform renovations to Hazen High School, located in the Residential — 8 dwelling units per acre (R-8) zone. The renovations include the addition of a 21,239 square foot auditorium at the southeast corner of the existing building. 2. The applicant is requesting a variance from section 4-2-110A of the City's Development Regulations, which restrict building height in the R-8 zone to 30 feet and 2-stories. The proposed auditorium addition would have a height of 38 feet, 8 feet greater than the maximum permitted height, only where necessitated by the function of the building. 3. The proposed building footprint would have a setback of 40 feet from the nearest property line (Hoquiam Avenue NE on the site's eastern boundary). There would be an additional setback of 16 feet (a 56-foot total) from this property line for the portions of the building proposed to exceed the height limitation. 4. Pursuant to the definitions contained in section 4-11-020, building height is measured from the average finished grade to the highest point of the coping of a flat roof. 5. In addition to the requested variance, the approval of the Administrative Site Plan and the completion of the Environmental (SEPA) Review portions of the land use application are necessary. CONCLUSIONS: FROM THESE FINDINGS OF FACT,THE BOARD MAKES THE FOLLOWING CONCLUSIONS: 1. City Code section 4-9-250B5 states the conditions under which a variance may be granted. Those conditions are listed below with discussion following about each variance. A. That the applicant suffers undue hardship and the variance is necessary because of special circumstances applicable to subject property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings of the subject property, and the strict application of the Zoning Code is found to deprive subject property owner of rights and privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity and under identical zone classification: The applicant maintains the development of an auditorium is essential for the continuing use of the property as a secondary school. Currently, the existing high school lacks the facilities necessary for large event functions and is forced to either utilize the gymnasium or hold events off-site. While the development of an auditorium would alleviate this hardship, the applicant contends the height limitation of the R-8 zone precludes the construction of such an addition. In order to accommodate the fundamental aspects of the auditorium use, a minimum height of 38 feet would be necessary for the proper function of the stage and seating areas. Without the essential overhead space, the stage lighting, sets, props, and other necessary equipment would not function properly and would possibly interfere with performance activities. The applicant also maintains that the strict interpretation of the zoning code would deprive them of the right to expand an existing secondary school in a manner that is necessary for the campus. In addition, the location of the secondary school within the R-8 zoning designation can be seen as special circumstances applicable only to the subject site. While the height limitation of the zone is clearly applicable to residential development, the standard is not appropriate for campus or school development. B. That the granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which subject property is situated: The applicant contends that potential impacts that would result from the proposed addition would be minimal to surrounding properties in the vicinity of the subject site, especially when considering the existing building as well as the location and design of the addition. The footprint of the auditorium addition would have an approximate setback of 40 feet from the nearest property line (Hoquiam Avenue NE). The portions of the building proposed to exceed the 30-foot height limitation would have an even greater setback from this street frontage (approximately 56 feet). In addition, the applicant has stated that"much care has gone into coordinating the massing of the new addition with the existing building so that it ties into the existing school in mass and material." Since portions of the existing building currently exceed the 30-foot height maximum, the addition would not be out of proportion to the existing buildings. Although the addition would intensify the building mass along the site's eastern boundary, the development would be sufficiently setback and appropriately designed to reduce avoid adverse visual impacts to adjacent properties. Furthermore, the approval of the variance would not set a precedent for the residential development in the surrounding area and R-8 zoning designation. Therefore, the granting of the variance would not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is situated. C. That approval shall not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is situated: The properties in the vicinity of the subject site which are designated R-8 are mostly developed with single family residences. By virtue of student populations, the location of secondary schools are distributed in a regional manner. Therefore, there are no other uses within this area that would be able to justify the need for a 680-seat auditorium with a building height of 38 feet. Because the granting of the variance would not be applicable to residential development, it would not be considered a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is situated. D. That the approval as determined by the Board of Adjustment is a minimum variance that will accomplish the desired purpose: The applicant maintains that the requested 38-foot height is the minimum height under which the auditorium stage and seating functions could be accommodated. The applicant further contends that the additional 8 feet in height is proposed only for the portions of the addition where it is absolutely necessary for the required auditorium functions and would be applied only to the parapet area of the building above the stage and seating areas. Therefore, the approval of the variance would be the minimal variance necessary for the addition of an auditorium to the existing high school campus. DECISION: FROM THE FOREGOING FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS, THE BOARD ENTERS THE FOLLOWING DECISION: 1. The variance is hereby granted from the Development Regulations, section 4-2-110A of the City of Renton Development Regulations, allowing the proposed auditorium addition for Hazen High School at a height of 38 feet. The Variance approval is contingent upon the approval of the Administrative Site Plan portion of the land use application. DATED this 27th day of October, 1999. An appeal of the Board of Adjustment decision is governed by Title IV, Chapter 36, Section I, which requires that such appeal be filed with the Superior Court of Washington for King County within 21 days from the date of issuance of the decision. The land use decision is considered issued three (3)days after a written decision is mailed by the City. The appeal period for this variance will end at 5:00 PM on November 21, 1999. . ---\. C......)". k,A.A._e4"--) reg u le George Feigh er An-1-- Teri Briere Jim Jacques c_ t�1 r�-- 41� - J y V�allace Jim Jolly Ralp ans BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT STAFF REPORT OCTOBER 27, 1999 A. BACKGROUND APPLICANT: Renton School District PROJECT NAME: Hazen High School Auditorium Height Variance APPLICATION NO.: LUA-99-137, SA-A, V-B SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Request for a variance from the maximum height permitted in the Residential —8 dwelling units per acre (R- 8) zone (section 4-2-110A). The auditorium is proposed at a height of 38 feet, which would exceed the 30-foot height limitation by 8 feet. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 1101 Hoquiam Avenue NE °''- 1j}Ili .. � . - `-J '3 6 ' I" !-:.,,p" ---,---4 6 Lle . ; 4.1., ,,, IN - ,,, lic, ,...A . a f-.. ,,, l, ...., Er so MIGILADS PLAZA M °"'4.. ��^ l�M+�a- 1 -4- - .•�N-. J4 . , . i■ 1e . T � �.JC —.emu 01 is ^ qp , I i , ' _ - u- .... ...sir , -a _ r - -•a `".) . ` — I W fi jj 11�COMM 1 1 --Ti cir . _ a ,, t7 d I J ^Z^ boarpt I BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT STAFF REPORT HAZEN HIGH SCHOOL AUDITORIUM HEIGHT DANCE LUA-99-137,SA-A,V-B OCTOBER 27, 1999 Page 2 of 3 B. BACKGROUND The Renton School District is proposing to perform renovations to Hazen High School, located in the Residential — 8 dwelling units per acre (R-8) zone. A major component of the renovation includes the addition of an auditorium to the southeast corner of the existing building. The proposed height of the auditorium addition, at 38 feet, is the subject of the variance request. Section 4-2-110A of the City's Development Regulations restricts building height in the R-8 zone to 30 feet and 2-stories. In order to provide the existing school with an on-site auditorium facility, the applicant is seeking a variance to exceed the height limitation by 8 feet. The proposed auditorium addition would have a 19,500 square foot first floor (of which 17,400 square feet is new construction) and a 1,829 square foot second floor — for a total auditorium area of 21,329 square feet. The auditorium would be designed to accommodate approximately 650 to 680 seats. The proposed building footprint would have a setback of 40 feet from the nearest property line (Hoquiam Avenue NE on the site's eastern boundary). There would be an additional setback of 16 feet (a 56-foot total) from this property line for the portions of the building proposed to exceed the height limitation. Pursuant to the definitions contained in section 4-11-020, building height is measured from the average finished grade to the highest point of the coping of a flat roof. In addition to the requested variance, the proposal requires Administrative Site Plan Review and Environmental (SEPA) Review. The remainder of the proposed renovations would be reviewed under the Administrative Site Plan portion of the land use application. In addition to the auditorium, the renovation project includes the creation of a commons area within an existing courtyard, the remodeling of the administrative wing of the building, and the development of a new student entry plaza. The project also includes the reconfiguration of parking areas, revisions to landscaping, and street improvements to Hoquiam Avenue NE. The administrative review of the project will be conducted after the completion of the SEPA process, of which the Renton School District is serving as lead agency. C. VARIANCE DECISION CRITERIA Development Regulations Section 4-9-250B5— The Reviewing Official shall have authority to grant a variance upon making a determination in writing that the conditions specified below have been found to exist: A. That the applicant suffers undue hardship and the variance is necessary because of special circumstances applicable to subject property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings of the subject property, and the strict application of the Zoning Code is found to deprive subject property owner of rights and privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity and under identical zone classification: The applicant maintains the development of an auditorium is essential for the continuing use of the property as a secondary school. Currently, the existing high school lacks the facilities necessary for large event functions and is forced to either utilize the gymnasium or hold events off-site. While the development of an auditorium would alleviate this hardship, the applicant contends the height limitation of the R-8 zone precludes the construction of such an addition. In order to accommodate the fundamental aspects of the auditorium use, a minimum height of 38 feet would be necessary for the proper function of the stage and seating areas. Without the essential overhead space, the stage lighting, sets, props, and other necessary equipment would not function properly and would possibly interfere with performance activities. The applicant also maintains that the strict interpretation of the zoning code would deprive them of the right to expand an existing secondary school in a manner that is necessary for the campus. In addition, the location of the secondary school within the R-8 zoning designation can be seen as special circumstances applicable only to the subject site. While the height limitation of the zone is clearly applicable to residential development, the standard is not appropriate for campus or school development. boarpt BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT STAFF REPORT HAZEN HIGH SCHOOL AUDITORIUM HEIGH1 ;IANCE LUA-99-137,SA-A,V-B OCTOBER 27, 1999 Page 3 of 3 B. That the granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which subject property is situated: The applicant contends that potential impacts that would result from the proposed addition would be minimal to surrounding properties in the vicinity of the subject site, especially when considering the existing building as well as the location and design of the addition. The footprint of the auditorium addition would have an approximate setback of 40 feet from the nearest property line (Hoquiam Avenue NE). The portions of the building proposed to exceed the 30-foot height limitation would have an even greater setback from this street frontage (approximately 56 feet). In addition, the applicant has stated that "much care has gone into coordinating the massing of the new addition with the existing building so that it ties into the existing school in mass and material." Since portions of the existing building currently exceed the 30-foot height maximum, the addition would not be out of proportion to the existing buildings. Although the addition would intensify the building mass along the site's eastern boundary, the development would be sufficiently setback and appropriately designed to reduce avoid adverse visual impacts to adjacent properties. Furthermore, the approval of the variance would not set a precedent for the residential development in the surrounding area and R-8 zoning designation. Therefore, the granting of the variance would not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is situated. C. That approval shall not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is situated: The properties in the vicinity of the subject site which are designated R-8 are mostly developed with single family residences. By virtue of student populations, the location of secondary schools are distributed in a regional manner. Therefore, there are no other uses within this area that would be able to justify the need for a 680-seat auditorium with a building height of 38 feet. Because the granting of the variance would not be applicable to residential development, it would not be considered a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is situated. D. That the approval as determined by the Board of Adjustment is a minimum variance that will accomplish the desired purpose: The applicant maintains that the requested 38-foot height is the minimum height under which the auditorium stage and seating functions could be accommodated. The applicant further contends that the additional 8 feet in height is proposed only for the portions of the addition where it is absolutely necessary for the required auditorium functions and would be applied only to the parapet area of the building above the stage and seating areas. Therefore, the approval of the variance would be the minimal variance necessary for the addition of an auditorium to the existing high school campus. D. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the requested variance from Section 4-2-110A of the City of Renton Development Regulations. The variance allows the proposed auditorium addition for Hazen High School at a height of 38 feet. The Variance approval is contingent upon the approval of the Administrative Site Plan portion of the land use application. Transmitted this 20th day of November, 1999 to the applicant and owner: Renton School District(owner) DLR Group (contact) Mike Torgerson Lisa Johnson Capital Projects Office 900 Fourth Avenue, Suite 700 1220 North 4th Street Seattle, WA 98164 Renton, WA 98134 boarpt • • TR 11 a_,vim ♦ �-'; —__ 1-- a emu■ :!!�_ �:� a.. 411147,77 k i ,' - I = 0... ,.0 1 ■"■ Imo !E .o.n.c •• ...r nnnnnn„� tttttn,nnt� ,� Orr KISM0 ..o a —14 i lid _i III ■IIII Alf. �MI � "O NOT FLOOR MO .u. 0 © . .--Qt.. a 'O�m 0 s - �a . s n st21 iw nuLC+.^ 1.1�1 I - 1°m.m O‘MM O South Elevation ° ma-•— �,°• ,� ®North Elevation p p � 0 I 0 12 dse Ws& Q <S .' .,. "MOOR`t..O ,.,. E —o"' —a- o- U..Po. ..•IE tom.-._, •. Q ♦a=gib- — t�s s=w — i v .... — m — r _ _ 1�Ir,. rs=.•. i+�• N2_=.-M�ff!.it.r iff, ____.1 . ___ �I�y{1 I „m ., 0 a n°aM1� • = c •u 111 _ co NE � _ y c O C = _- _ __n_' ❑❑ ❑❑ f ,. . • . �. =1A'=/ =- Oa"Om_a d C O O -,-=GC� r1--• 0E OO g g 0 - „ - , - , —o. [- � -0. L . • uiL© c ®East Elevation •.. a (n r9 L w 2 rn c • c � � N �4 x = y :t x a r aw,, r., . ar J =r in CU m 2 1l1111 s� iri O .f" _. • --0"'• T ^0 00 0 0 O 0 . O East Elevation-Continued(Northern Portion) `� Partial North Elevation-Along Gridline 7 n H ®E. m . 0 0 0 0 00 00 00 0 0 0 C Door Types Relite Frames Storefront, Window, Louver Types Q rat,/r-1's rat,n- -r 61 • - 1 I 1L SITE PLAN APPROVAL SUBMITTAL © .� 9/24/99 ® 2,. AT O C IO SC•t!Jv ail ///////////i/ii/i///////i///i//i,:2 O I 0 ❑ O / i/ I .�/ ' i P :;i / ////'/'////_ _ Oi/ / i/ i aerorn�was.Ls Ip < / px�///////////////l///////////� i ///////////// � %% I I I -T COMMONS RENOVATION A� v o • 4 HAZEN HIGH SCHOOL ° Z 2 / yl FINISHED FLOOR > c / ti ELEVAT/ON�t7?-O / C C -/ it / \ 0 O '% (//<i/i/-i/ii��//�/�1G/�� ///•////•/://!/, /,-/•/// p g > i Ii �/ I/.3 3i # 1t flflflIj ADMINISTRATIVE RENOVATION i�'•••�^(1 t / J{} }jj,,2�� � �rr�. {F`• T 6 /• et� a•'1 Qn to :44 / i�IIIIIiIIIr•'avv . . use '.•:-v1.v J1., •/.// / / / // ♦.-.♦ ...•: / ,'?NEW AUDITORIUM ADDITION I'' 4. / JIl1 .••••i.i•OP: • :.•.. •••••..:0 4.0.".O••••••••i❖• '!••O•••••+*�•ati i•••••i•••••*•i••••i i-,,,,,,,c.o.",••••`i i••i i i•,,-..••i i i s •..,i i. lT a., V C o a „knolls IINA.•••�^��•VI,"•.•f•.44s'•••••.•`•,•••••'•••'u'0•••�••••�••i��•: ..•••a+•••.p•••••••!i••:•••••Tty•••••.'oe.••. i O••>•••i 7,•••P• ••• •••••.• ,` ` '. ,�1 „ t:" •.•• ,w•••-,...•.•• •1.,tet!14t1 ..Uw•.a!Y1mIt 4•,,f.!•et....• 0, .•a$!,im. ...! . ,:".41,,o,.z.....:.•.:.•- C •.f ■ C y. ,,;r•W 1 * {.+.., t "1( '\il pLd% �..--_gq/s!,,A4.LJs _ 4'74%.�t �/eT e.---- �e t •O••1: . i„Z #h"1 �` u .e`� A" •/.. /4 itfih ti.1.1Nag ji�I�T1, 1 III\ Ia-I 4�-II�_I0I 111I DI�_�IIII�tIIa: I/ I54 .�.,.� • ..K.6 D.O.bT.LMi • env+ '� fir' _ j1.�i'�I� •r t/-..re3 a rry 41:CS a.•50•MCP;O.:K &MCMo:4.,M,4 A.P.,•.+..tra$4.'f•a:Lf.44t-n�•A�@ itr hl ,7 a ' -•ii ' \ p:�-.•. �o I-(i<•�� �i4�T_ Mr •� �, �c �� •� �, sae v •i`• R/.e•TO OxTeO•w•T•0 PM.•s LOT. -. . �, r1 ■■ S�,I� ��4 3. f',0* nm.—... To ADO.a.aww..cau•L,<••To Tr�•n rL•rr.rw �.� •`i, �_ -r GJ► �4 '9 D AuwLa T..avt.T wy° ■ e]O N 02414..TALL• ■ ■ I i••', "";; �!1!�••'.' i•••••.• 4r- - :•�••\1••�' / �••. • •��eV.. L 1 L ASSO�IAT 5 •��.1• .::�. . �� fir., +�. •. •• .. ... . �p�, •;✓ W.0- ':.:::• :. O.!i.�••.: •..t••i i•.,:MMi ii,........- .0.. NO.. ..•iNPiV..v%4■iT i i P• NV." :.4 .6Y.�Nb.d� a4: %M,s /lb� :.:.:':..•:::::.4 i .•✓.!.a..-.%...0•.•.• • .:4t...',�./� ,�•:�..:�•��..R 4•y•.O�.❖ti�.44.�.� 's- �•r C.... .• ..•,a r✓n ... ,c •6� ��ir� � I _o PL.n•■.ga..woA,...�a --- ------ ---- ---- - ----- - -- I [><UT.G MDOIYLK YO 0l115 TO 1l.T•K Y.PLA..Y TO PASAD LOT NO ACCZM 0*01 MM.,Ob.•.L.SO.001•.. txMT.+6•CUM 00•••MO CYl.TO 0111....1 142nd AVENUE S.E.1NOC 'JtAf4 A'VE N� .�� M. Ce PUBLIC HEARING OCTOBER 27 , 1999 7 : 30 PM BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT 1 . CALL TO ORDER 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. ROLL CALL 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES (June 23, 1999) 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS SCHEDULED: • Hazen High School Renovation Variance LUA-99-137, SA-A,V Location: 1101 Hoquiam Avenue NE • Normandy Ridge Variance LUA-99-136,SA-A,V,ECF Location: 4914 Talbot Road South 6. When you are recognized by the Presiding Officer, please walk to the podium and state your name and address for the record, SPELLING YOUR LAST NAME. 7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 8. NEW BUSINESS 9. ANNOUNCEMENTS 10. ADJOURNMENT CITY vF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator October 27, 1999 Lisa Johnson DLR Group 900 Fourth Avenue, Suite 700 Seattle, WA 98164 Subject: Hazen High School Renovations File No. LUA-99-137, SA-A, V-B Dear Ms. Johnson: Thank you for clarifying that the Renton School District will be serving as lead agency for the above referenced project. Your refund request for the $500 application fee incorrectly collected for Environmental (SEPA) Review is now being processed (see attached forms). The refund process will take approximately 4 weeks. If you have any questions, please contact me at (425) 430-7270. Sincerely, 47/A4j 4';1-2?-51 Lesley Nishihira Project Manager Cc: Mike Torgerson, Renton School District Yellow File 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, Washington 98055 [�7 rv. .. ..o.r.,..rt� cnoi,e,.,,rinrl mororl 9f1%nncr rnnci imar City of Renton Finance Department Request for Claims Date of Request /D/as/o(ci Date Required A1SA-P Requesting Department P/a/ F' IN/ Authorized Signatu REASON FOR CHECK 34- Po - g43:; /v A Deposit Refund Name (--roN sit-1G0L Div..iciAmount 455-vc) QD Finance Receipt No gq o 3q , Receipt Date �j/� L/cf 9 Other Describe Circumstances Requiring Issuance of Check: /1) 11 C44'l t 1,t41 s i C erk- 1-i C1i i cet fev S&PA t 001 sclt aoi vwZ', G,� �y�n�� els Lead etgunCy. CHECK PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS Amount $ rJ- 00,C>U Charge to Account(s) �,345.I'i. C'U• C'OC).1 /EN'J. i EAj. Payable To FZFiNTONI SCt-IONI, DtS1-1'—ICE Address E% Rs D PO 2-7-0 N U cz.m 4 1— 5T fl Mail Check to Payee •VVA sic? t ?+ I H El/ Return to Dept: PEA) . X7,) P/ ) P v\) Soc Sec or IRS ID No 0 Other: CHECK AUTHORIZATION - Finance Department Use Only Approved Date 0 Claims Check No: CTY006/7/89 - e Fr. •**************************************************************** City of Renton WA Reprinted: 09/30/99 16 :48 Receipt **************************************************************** Receipt Number: R9904893 Amount: 1, 757 .92 09/30/99 16 :48 Payment Method: BILL Notation: RSD 94335 Init: CRP Project #: LUA99-137 Type: LUA Land Use Actions Total Fees : 1, 757. 92 This Payment 1, 757 . 92 Total ALL Pmts: 1, 757 .92 Balance: . 00 • **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 000 . 345 . 81. 00 . 0007 Environmental Review 500 . 00 000 . 345 . 81 . 00 . 0017 Site Plan Approval 1, 000 . 00 000 . 345 . 81 . 00 . 0019 Variance Fees 250 . 00 000 . 05 . 519 . 90 .42 . 1 Postage 7 .92 /r **************************************************************** City of Renton WA Receipt **************************************************************** Receipt Number: R9905390 Amount: -500 .00 10/27/99 11:47 Payment Method: REFUND Notation: REFUND BY FIN Init: LN Project # : LUA99-137 Type: LUA Land Use Actions Parcel No: 102305-9278 Total Fees: 1, 257.92 This Payment -500. 00 Total ALL Pmts : 1,257.92 Balance: .00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 000 . 345 . 81. 00 . 0007 Environmental Review -500 . 00 C(9 ..i3"I �y ) hiDLR Group t100 Fourth Avenue, Suite 700 October 19, 1999 Se.iluIu,WA YH164-100b it-I 1,,116/461•(1OQ(t City of Renton fax 244461.6(W) Development Services Division .r.:+ttlewedlrl;ntlzcorn 1055 South Grady Way Renton,WA 98055 Attn: Lesley Nishihlra 425-430-7270 Project Name: Hazen High School 1101 Hioquiam Ave. NE, Renton WA 98059 DLR Project#: 73-99-137-00 Regarding: SEPA Environmental Checklist Dear Lesley: This letter is to inform you that.Renton School District will be acting as a lead agency for the SEPA environmental review comment. The determination is currently advertised and out for review by the public, with comments due back November 1''. Questions regarding the comments may be directed to Mike •Vorgerson at the Renton School District Capital Projects Office, 1220 North 4'Street, Renton WA 98134,at 425.204-4470. Since the District is acting as lead agency, we ate requesting that the $500 fee paid on September 30, 1999 as part of purchase order #94335 be refunded to the Renton School District at this time. Please contact me if you have any additional questions or comments. Sincerely, DIR Gro i.isa J nson Associate in the Firm Cc: File , LKJ/Ih Seattle Applclnn ( 0l11/dtto Splint. I1envtlr I)e.Moines l arnunktt.n I loii,,lulu K,in'.i, C ily Milw.tukve Mlnneapoll. (ln.tha Uvtarl.tm1 I'.Itl: t'hitatlulllIIi.t I'Iti)Ctiik I'ii•rro Ptttllantl SIOUX 14111K Tampa S E P Al ester 1 0 1 999cityrenton,lkj.doc RENTON BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Board of Adjustment at its regular meeting in the Council Chambers, on the seventh floor of City Hall, 1055 So. Grady Way, Renton, WA, on October 27, 1999 at 7:30 PM to consider the following variances: HAZEN HIGH SCHOOL RENOVATION VARIANCE LUA-99-137,SA-A,V-B Project requires the approval of a height variance. A parking modification request is also included to exceed the maximum number of permitted parking stalls. Location: 1101 Hoquiam Ave. NE. NORMANDY RIDGE VARIANCE LUA-99-136,SA-A,V-B,ECF Request for a variance from the Land Clearing and Tree Cutting Ordinance to allow the street crossings to intrude into the 25-foot required buffer. Location: 4914 Talbot Road So. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Development Services Division, Sixth Floor, Renton City Hall. All interested persons to said petitions are invited to be present at the Public Hearing to express their opinions. Publication Date: October 15, 1999 Account No. 51067 BOAPUB October 14, 1999 OVA 1 • Lesley Nishihira C/�,F� I,. slil DLR Group City of Renton n 447-.:9,tilp 900 Fourth Avenue, Suite 700 Development Services Division C / ONattle,WA 98164-1006 1055 South Grady Way Ri:` Z999 tel 206/461-6000 Renton, WA 98055 CFI �17 fax 206/461-6049 j� Seattle@dlrgroup.com Project Name: Hazen High School (� 1 101 Hoquiam Ave. NE, Renton WA 98059 DLR Project#: 73-99-137-00 Regarding: Phasing of construction of Hazen High School Dear Lesley: The Renton School District is currently planning a full renovation to the Hazen High School that will bring the building in its entirety up to current code. Due to the availability of bond funds for the project as well as the necessity of maintaining school operations in the building during construction, the construction of the High School will be phased as follows: Phase I: Renovation of the H.S. Commons, Administration wing, and Auditorium addition from March 2000 through June 2001. Phase II: Remodel and Renovation to the remainder of the High School from May 2003 through September 2004. During the first phase, we are proposing that the fire suppression (sprinkler) system, the fire alarm system, and electrical service be installed per current code in phase I areas only. The fire suppression and fire alarm will be sized to accommodate phase II improvements. The new fire alarm system will be served by a new addressable panel, which will communicate with the existing panel via AutoDial to indicate alarm zones throughout the entire building and maintain the UL integrity of the new system. A second electrical service will be added to serve the area in phase I. During the remodel of the high school in the second phase, as the walls, ceilings, floors and other infrastructure are being renovated; the fire suppression and fire alarm system will be extended into the remainder of the building. The current electrical service, transformer and panels will be improved at this time to serve the remainder of the building, resulting in two services to the building. We are requesting that the building be permitted for phased construction per the timelines above, allowing the areas of the building per phase one to achieve occupancy at the end of its construction phase while the Phase II work is being executed. The fire alarm and fire suppression permit drawings for the entire building will be submitted with the phase I permit to ensure compliance, but wiii be executed in two phases. We feel this scenario not only ensures the life safety for the Hazen students but also maximizes the public funds committed to educational improvements for the Renton community. Sincerely, DL Grou raig Mas n Principal i the Firm CM/Igh cc: File • Seattle Appleton Colorado Springs Denver Des Moines Farmington Honolulu Kansas City Milwaukee Minneapolis Omaha Overland Park Philadelphia Phoenix Pierre Portland Sioux Falls Tampa City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Wws6 5ew(cis COMMENTS DUE: OCTOBER 19, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-137,SA-A,V-B DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBEIttlabpmENT SERVICES APPLICANT: Renton School District PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nishihir?ITY OF RENTON PROJECT TITLE: Hazen High School Renovation/Addition WORK ORDER NO: 78585 OCT U 6 1,,99 LOCATION: 1101 Hoquiam Avenue NE SITE AREA: 33.9 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A RECEIVED SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The Renton School District is requesting Site Plan Approval (SA-A)for the remodeling and auditorium addition of Hazen High School. Approximately 11,907 sq.ft. of the main building would be remodeled in order to create a commons area and improve the administrative wing within the school. Approximately 19,229 sq.ft. would be created for the 650-seat auditorium and new plaza entrance additions. The project also includes the reconfiguration of parking areas, revisions to landscaping, and street improvements. Due to the proposed height of the addition at 38 feet, the project requires the approval of a height variance from the Board of Adjustment(BOA). A parking modification request is also included to exceed the maximum number of permitted parking stalls. The Renton School District is serving as lead agency for the SEPA review of the proposal. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics _ Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS Ulf R E K/ P I ci 'I -7 v 0 c 1 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. / / ( 1/ 7 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date routing Rev.10/93 v City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: c. re preueskAtuni COMMENTS DUE: OCTOBER 19, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-137,SA-A,V-B DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 5, 1999 APPLICANT: Renton School District PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nishihira NTON FIRE DEPT PROJECT TITLE: Hazen High School Renovation/Addition WORK ORDER NO: 78585 "Tim,'BUREAU LOCATION: 1101 Hoquiam Avenue NE OCT 0 5 1999 SITE AREA: 33.9 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A n SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The Renton School District is requesting Site Plan Approval (SA-A)for t .emed �r, v auditorium addition of Hazen High School. Approximately 11,907 sq.ft. of the main building would be remodeled in order to create a commons area and improve the administrative wing within the school. Approximately 19,229 sq.ft. would be created for the 650-seat auditorium and new plaza entrance additions. The project also includes the reconfiguration of parking areas, revisions to landscaping, and street improvements. Due to the proposed height of the addition at 38 feet, the project requires the approval of a height variance from the Board of Adjustment (BOA). A parking modification request is also included to exceed the maximum number of permitted parking stalls. The Renton School District is serving as lead agency for the SEPA review of the proposal. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet se e B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS ---> z e?cccrs- fca e-/CA.AD .2.f •vice C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS a:cc a(/C..Sl d&1 eJ 11,t «c ss ??? We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Cl/IVArrir-"& //9? Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date routing Rev.10/93 0 rcY C�4 0 + CITY OF'RENTON - FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU NTO� MEMORANDUM DATE: August 5, 1999 TO: Laureen Nicolay, Planner FROM: Jim Gray, Assistant Fire Marshal. 1 SUBJECT: Hazen High School Addition, 1101 Hoquiam Av NE Fire Department Comments: 1. The preliminary Fire flow is 2750 GPM which requires one fire hydrant within 150 feet of the building and two additional hydrants within 300 feet of the building. 2. The entire new and existing building is required to be fully sprinklered by City Ordinance. 3. A fire mitigation fee of$17,282.20 is required based on $.52 a square foot of the new building square footage. -- I 4. Separate plans and permits are required for the fire alarm xid sprinkler syste,ms. . �ina__ c jaA , S y�f.Q,,,,.. l CI. rrle�t Q�I'S CB ,e3, Please feel free to contact me if ou have any uestions. 6, le�/4•v r/)e cyci-w.e,,,, S t/l p pdiZ.r a i.v, FZQ Tv e s 4-0 e x c ma„tc 1.ti..0 "vs Al "3 6� , ©.//� to e�w`1 ( ecta k/x,3 sh.(I s. P.r.zknvi cz 1-' �h)s I'o c c.A.-' Act"— L-e-Q-,, �.v e ns 4 2c e...ei e-A - p�LIB ,� lP`��. City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 0..v.k�S COMMENTS DUE: OCTOBER 19, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-137,SA-A,V-B DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 5, 1999 APPLICANT: Renton School District PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nishihira PROJECT TITLE: Hazen High School Renovation/Addition WORK ORDER NO: 78585 LOCATION: 1101 Hoquiam Avenue NE SITE AREA: 33.9 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The Renton School District is requesting Site Plan Approval (SA-A)for the remodeling and auditorium addition of Hazen High School. Approximately 11,907 sq.ft. of the main building would be remodeled in order to create a commons area and improve the administrative wing within the school. Approximately 19,229 sq.ft. would be created for the 650-seat auditorium and new plaza entrance additions. The project also includes the reconfiguration of parking areas, revisions to landscaping, and street improvements. Due to the proposed height of the addition at 38 feet, the project requires the approval of a height variance from the Board of Adjustment(BOA). A parking modification request is also included to exceed the maximum number of permitted parking stalls. The Renton School District is serving as lead agency for the SEPA review of the proposal. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water _ Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use _ Utilities Animals —. Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet j//42/1k aA,e, Atvez24170a,L4 B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS „liutAz arts. ar C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS dw �� /Go We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is n•-•ed to properly assess this proposal. irect -ce �� ,r'ir � - (o / Signature of or or Authorized •epresentative Date routing Rev.10/93 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: tWvtovvx bev *COMMENTS DUE: OCTOBER 19, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-137,SA-A,V-B DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 5, 1999 APPLICANT: Renton School District PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nishihira PROJECT TITLE: Hazen High School Renovation/Addition WORK ORDER NO: 78585 LOCATION: 1101 Hoquiam Avenue NE SITE AREA: 33.9 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The Renton School District is requesting Site Plan Approval (SA-A)for the remodeling and auditorium addition of Hazen High School. Approximately 11,907 sq.ft. of the main building would be remodeled in order to create a commons area and improve the administrative wing within the school. Approximately 19,229 sq.ft.would be created for the 650-seat auditorium and new plaza entrance additions. The project also includes the reconfiguration of parking areas, revisions to landscaping, and street improvements. Due to the proposed height of the addition at 38 feet, the project requires the approval of a height variance from the Board of Adjustment(BOA). A parking modification request is also included to exceed the maximum number of permitted parking stalls. The Renton School District is serving as lead agency for the SEPA review of the proposal. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS 517e: 15 063iL./\J/r/G-62 ocr-r7sft7_ Stry!-.C_� Fmv`t tr . Nv eolAc r t SSOLSS . ro� 5-r1S✓ttc2.t c_ 94../�-Ivry( n,c, C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date routing Rev.10/93 City o enton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: tatter COMMENTS DUE: OCTOBER 19, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-137,SA-A,V-B DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 5, 1999 APPLICANT: Renton School District PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nishihira PROJECT TITLE: Hazen High School Renovation/Addition WORK ORDER NO: 78585 LOCATION: 1101 Hoquiam Avenue NE SITE AREA: 33.9 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The Renton School District is requesting Site Plan Approval (SA-A)for the remodeling and . auditorium addition of Hazen High School. Approximately 11,907 sq.ft. of the main building would be remodeled in order to create a commons area and improve the administrative wing within the school. Approximately 19,229 sq.ft. would be created for the 650-seat auditorium and new plaza entrance additions. The project also includes the reconfiguration of parking areas, revisions to landscaping, and street improvements. Due to the proposed height of the addition at 38 feet, the project requires the approval of height variance from the Board of Adjustment (BOA). A parking modification request is also included to exceed the maximum number of permitted parking stalls. The Renton School District is serving as lead agency for the SEPA review of the proposal. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic./Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet I 1 UNPQ_C4' OYI POha ,A7wic.(2.4 B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. C . AA 11- to -`) Signature of Director or Au orized Representative Date routing Rev.10/93 CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: October 14, 1999 TO: Lesley Nishihira FROM: Arne ta Henninger X7298 k SUBJECT: HAZEN HIGH SCHOOL RENOVATIONS/ADDITION 1101 HOQUIAM AV NE APPLICATION LUA 99-137 I have reviewed the application for this proposed building generally located in Section 10- 23N-5E and have the following comments: SEWER: • This project is located in the Aquifer Protection Zone 2. • There is an existing 8" sanitary sewer main NE 10th St. A sanitary sewer main extension will be required by this project. The project will be required to extend the sanitary sewer main in NE 10th St across the full frontage p� of the parcel of land being developed. The project will also be required to install a f ' sanitary sewer main in Hoquiam Av NE across the full frontage of the parcel of land. The applicant does have the option of signing a City of Renton Temporary Service document agreeing to install the improvements at some future date in lieu of installing the improvements at this time. • No structures may be located over the sanitary sewer main. • Any use in the building subject to oils or grease shall require the installation of a grease interceptor or oil/water separator as determined at the time of plan review. oi r$ System Development Charges (SDC) are $0.078 per square foot. These fees are collected at the time a construction permit is issued. WATER: • The site is located in the Aquifer Protection Zone 2. • The project site is located in the 565 Pressure Zone. HAZEN HIGH SCHOOL APPLICATION October 15, 1999 Page 2 of 3 • There is an existing 12" watermain in the (unimproved) right-of-way of NE 12th St. This watermain is a line that deadends at a fire hydrant. See City of Renton drawing #903 for the AsBuilt engineering plans. Nr Per the City of Renton Fire Marshall, the preliminary fire flow for this project is 2750 GPM. Per the City of Renton code, fireflows that exceed 2500 GPM require the installation of a looped watermain around the building or complex of buildings. It appears that the site is currently served by Water District 90. The following comments are from the Water Division following my discussion with them on this matter. The subject property is within the City of Renton's water service area established by the East King County Coordinated Water System plan, which was approved by King County and by the Department of Health. Water District 90 (WD 90) currently provides water to the property from an existing waterline located in Hoquiam Ave NE (a.k.a. 142nd Ave. SE). The City of Renton currently has a 12-inch water main located in NE 12th St and Duvall Ave. NE. In order for the City to provide water service to Hazen high school property, the property owner or school district will be required to install a substantial amount of water main extension along Duvall Ave NE, NE 12th St. extension and around the high school buildings. These improvements may not be economically feasible at the present time for the proposed addition to the school. Therefore, the City will allow WD 90 to continue to provide water service to the school on a temporary basis subject to the following conditions: • Execution of a temporary water service area between Renton and WD 90 that will identify Renton as the long-term water service provider to the property and WD 90 as a temporary water service provider. • Execution of a temporary water service agreement between Renton and the School District for the future extension of Renton's water mains. • WD 90 will provide assurance to Renton that the district's water system can provide the required fire flow demand for the improvements as determined by Renton Fire Department. Results of hydrant flow tests and hydraulic analyses of the district's system shall be submitted to the City. • All water system improvements by WD 90 required for the proposed development shall meet Renton standards. STREET IMPROVEMENTS: • The City is not requesting that roadway improvements on NE 10th St or on NE 12th St be installed, however the applicant does need to make a formal application to the Board ‘AV, of Public Works to request a deferral. Staff will support a request to defer the street " r improvements on NE 10th St and on NE 12th St. •° Street lights will be required to be installed by this project. HAZEN HIGH SCHOOL APPLICATION October 15, 1999 Page 3 of 3 STORM DRAINAGE: • A drainage report was submitted with the formal application for the project and appears to be in order. • There are storm drainage facilities in NE 12th St. • There are storm drainage facilities in NE 10th St. • There are storm drainage facilities in Hoquiam Av NE. • A drainage control plan designed per the King County Surface Water Manual will be required for this project. If there is 5,000 square feet or more of new impervious area subject to vehicular use, a Biofiltration Swale is required, depending on the calculations for the site development. • The Surface Water SDC fees of$0.129 (but not less than $385) per square foot of new impervious area may be required if not previously paid. GENERAL: • All required utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed Civil Engineer. • Permit application must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. The fee for review and inspection of these improvement is 5% of the first $100,000 of the estimated construction costs; 4% of anything over $100,000 but less than $200,000, and 3% of anything over $200,000. Half of the fee must be paid upon application for building and construction permits, and the remainder when the permits are issued. There may be additional fees for water service related expenses. See Drafting Standards. HAZGF City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: S,lLGI w� r COMMENTS DUE: OCTOBER 19, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-137,SA-A,V-B DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 5/1LOPME M SERVICES APPLICANT: Renton School District PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nishihira CITY OF RFNTON PROJECT TITLE: Hazen High School Renovation/Addition WORK ORDER NO: 78585 OCT 06 1999 LOCATION: 1101 Hoquiam Avenue NE SITE AREA: 33.9 acres BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A RECEIVED SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The Renton School District is requesting Site Plan Approval (SA-A)for the remodeling and auditorium addition of Hazen High School. Approximately 11,907 sq.ft. of the main building would be remodeled in order to create a commons area and improve the administrative wing within the school. Approximately 19,229 sq.ft. would be created for the 650-seat auditorium and new plaza entrance additions. The project also includes the reconfiguration of parking areas, revisions to landscaping, and street improvements. Due to the proposed height of the addition at 38 feet, the project requires the approval of a height variance from the Board of Adjustment (BOA). A parking modification request is also included to exceed the maximum number of permitted parking stalls. The Renton School District is serving as lead agency for the SEPA review of the proposal. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS • We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is ee ed to property assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Da e routing Rev.10/93 City of R 1 Department of Planning/Building/Public bvuures ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: I ReVlfUJ - LJa"er COMMENTS DUE: OCTOBER 19, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-137,SA-A,V-B DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 5, 1999 APPLICANT: Renton School District PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley CITY OF RCNTON Nishira ELOPMENT SERVICES PROJECT TITLE: Hazen High School Renovation/Addition WORK ORDER NO: 78585 OCT 0 6 1999 LOCATION: 1101 Hoquiam Avenue NE SITE AREA: 33.9 acres BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A RECEIVED SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The Renton School District is requesting Site Plan Approval (SA-A)for the remodeling and auditorium addition of Hazen High School. Approximately 11,907 sq.ft. of the main building would be remodeled in order to create a commons area and improve the administrative wing within the school. Approximately 19,229 sq.ft.would be created for the 650-seat auditorium and new plaza entrance additions. The project also includes the reconfiguration of parking areas, revisions to landscaping, and street improvements. Due to the proposed height of the addition at 38 feet, the project requires the approval of height variance from the Board of Adjustment(BOA). A parking modification request is also included to exceed the maximum number of permitted parking stalls. The Renton School District is serving as lead agency for the SEPA review of the proposal. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is nee ed to properly assess this proposal. L�,€ 6 01 a / / 9 �/Signature of ctor or Authorized Representative Date routing Rev.10/93 • City of.......on Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:-n5poIn i COMMENTS DUE: OCTOBER 19, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-137,SA-A,V-B DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 5, 199EDp/Ft opmag SERVICES APPLICANT: Renton School District PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nishihira CITY OF RENTON PROJECT TITLE: Hazen High School Renovation/Addition WORK ORDER NO: 78585 OCT 0 6 1999 LOCATION: 1101 Hoquiam Avenue NE (gross):� RECEIVED SITE AREA: 33.9 acres BUILDING AREA : N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The Renton School District is requesting Site Plan Approval (SA-A)for the remodeling and auditorium addition of Hazen High School. Approximately 11,907 sq.ft. of the main building would be remodeled in order to create a commons area and improve the administrative wing within the school. Approximately 19,229 sq.ft. would be created for the 650-seat auditorium and new plaza entrance additions. The project also includes the reconfiguration of parking areas, revisions to landscaping, and street improvements. Due to the proposed height of the addition at 38 feet, the project requires the approval of a height variance from the Board of Adjustment (BOA). A parking modification request is also included to exceed the maximum number of permitted parking stalls. The Renton School District is serving as lead agency for the SEPA review of the proposal. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS Gat:tiad j(4.11k We have reviewed this applicatio with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas ere additional inform io is needed to properly assess this proposal. a 9t,Sig tur of Direc or or Aut orized Repres.411e ye Dat ) routing Rev.10/93 CITY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION LIST OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS within 300 feet of the subject site PROJECT NAME: HAZEN HIGH SCHOOL -1-Reinc la-±le11 APPLICATION NO: 1-0 A • 9q • I-31 , V- 5 , The following is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. The Development Services Division will notify these individuals of the proposed development. NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER Gino J. Nonis 11038 142nd SE, Renton 98055 032305-9054-01 Phillip G. Gesner 11025 142nd Ave SE, Renton 98055 032305-9056-00 City of Renton 200 Mill Ave S, Renton 98055 032305-9061-02 Douglas M. Martin 11049 142nd AVe SE, Renton 98059 032305-9087-02 Charlotte J. Bergeson 11027 142nd Ave SE, Renton 98059 032305-9129-02 Rafael Mendoza 14043 SE 112th St, Renton 98059 032305-9146-01 Patrick Blodgett 14218 SE 112 ST, Renton 98056 032305-9161-01 Robert D. Peterson 11041 142nd Ave SE, Renton 98056 032305-9171-09 David Blackshaw 11055 142nd Ave SE, Renton 98059 032305-9174-06 Rachael M. Pederson 2213 Duvall Ave NE, Renton 98059 032305-9228-02 Phillip G. Gesner 11025 142nd SE, Renton 98055 032305-9229-01 Martin Kenny 18719 Yew Way Rd, Snohomish 98290 102305-9002-05 Renton School Dist 435 Main Ave S, Renton 98055 102305-9057-09 Renton School Dist. 435 Main Ave S, Renton 98055 102305-9072-00 Renton School Dist. 435 Main Ave S, Renton 98055 102305-9077-05 Renton School Dist 435 Main Ave S, Renton 98055 102305-9084-06 Richard Miller 11228 142nd SE, Renton 98059 102305-9099-09 Wm E. Broyles 11224 142nd Ave SE, Renton 98059 102305-9144-04 Schwiesow, Robert & 11246 142nd Ave SE, Renton 98059 102305-9218-05 Baker, Rina Renton School Dist 435 Main Ave S, Renton 98055 102305-9292-04 Gordon K. Hayes 803 341st St Ct E, Roy 98580 102305-9312-00 Jay Hill & 8418 S 112th St, Seattle 98178 102305-9367-04 Dori A. Wysocki Verdie R. Querin 23410 160th Ave SE, Kent 98042 102305-9399-06 Renton School Dist. 435 Main Ave S, Renton 98055 516970-0073-03 Cam,FRE PIRA, SP3nNr°N SEC 1999 (Attach additional sheets, if necessary) (Continued) NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER Applicant Certification 1, .l e)%Te 5 ,J. 6bons , hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property (Print Name) owners and their addresses were obtained from: 0 City of Renton Technical Services Records 0 Title Company Records ® King County Assessors Records Signed ‘11-i1 o 5 Date ? - 9, (Applicant) NOTARY ATTESTED: S b cribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in an or t e State of Washington, residing at_ on the, Walay of , 19 Signed £ D otary Public) ****For City of Renton Use'**'' CERTIFICATION OF MAILING I, SA ;i hereby certify that notices of the proposed application were mailed to (City Employee) each listed property owner on C.)c=t_ 04, of I. c Signed .AJwrtlE.ktc. 5��;- c Y~ Date: CILt (\(< NOTARY ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in a lictifiesilae.Stastiailvijton residing at ':; on the / day ofCMARILYN r;` `kil • NO[A�v r J C Signed 2 � ) Gf '(.- — S c� ) c7 it e'l,-f SPATE OF WASHINGTON ✓ l"/ COMMISSION EXPIRES listprop.doc Rev 07/98 MARILYN KAMCHEFF .lU+ ? , 2003 MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES:6-29.03 2 C..4 1Y NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PUBLIC HEARING A Master Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NUMBER/NAME: LUA-99.137,SA.A,V-B/HAZEN HIGH SCHOOL RENOVATION/ADDITION PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The Renton School District is requesting Site Plan Approval(SA-A)for the remodeling and auditorium addition of Hazen High School. Approximately 11,907 sq.ft.of me main building would be remodeled in order to create a commons area and improve the administrative wing within the school. Approximately 19,229 sq fl.would be created for the 650-seat auditorium and new plaza entrance additions. The protect also includes the reconfiguration of parking areas,revisions to landscaping,and street improvements. Due to the proposed height of the addition at 38 feet,the project requires the approval of a height variance from Ore Board of Adjustment(BOA). A parking modification request is also included to exceed the maximum number of permitted parking stalls. The Renton School District is serving as lead agency for the SEPA review of the proposal. PROJECT LOCATION: 1101 Hoquiam Avenue NE PUBLIC APPROVALS: Administrative Site Plan Approval;Variance Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Ms.Lesley Nishihira,Project Manager,Development Services Division,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on October 19,1990. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail,contact Ms.Nishihira at(425)430-7270.Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. The data of Wednesday,October 27,1999,at 7:30 PM,has been set fora variance public hearing to review the proposed variance. The hearing,before the City of Renton's Board of Adjustment(BOA)will be held in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of City Hall,Renton,Washington. The applicant or representative(s)of the applicant Is required to be present at the public hearing.Interested parties are Invited to attend. !PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION DATE OF APPLICATION: September 30.1999 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: October 5,1999 DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: October 5.1999 NOTICE OF APPLICATION CERTIFICATION I, Le LexiN i ' l'u iYA , hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document were posted by me in a3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on Tie dAuq , O &I-v fit/✓ � 1qI 9 Signed: ATTEST: Subcribed and sworn before me, a Nortary Public, in and for State of Washington residing in g-, -79-7-1 , on the /as t, day of ( /411 MARILYN KAMCHEFF NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF WASHINGTON Comml.SSIQN EXPIRES J1;NE 2.9,2tK)3 MARILYN KAMCHEFF . -. ..� MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES:6-29-03 - i A . c + ��NT0� NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PUBLIC HEARING A Master Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NUMBER/NAME: LUA-99-137,SA-A,V-B/HAZEN HIGH SCHOOL RENOVATION/ADDITION PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The Renton School District is requesting Site Plan Approval (SA-A) for the remodeling and auditorium addition of Hazen High School. Approximately 11,907 sq.ft. of the main building would be remodeled in order to create a commons area and improve the administrative wing within the school. Approximately 19,229 sq.ft.would be created for the 650-seat auditorium and new plaza entrance additions. The project also includes • the reconfiguration of parking areas, revisions to landscaping, and street improvements. Due to the proposed height of the addition at 38 feet, the project requires the approval of a height variance from the Board of Adjustment (BOA). A parking modification request is also included to exceed the maximum number of permitted parking stalls. The Renton School District is serving as lead agency for the SEPA review of the proposal. PROJECT LOCATION: 1101 Hoquiam Avenue NE PUBLIC APPROVALS: Administrative Site Plan Approval;Variance Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Ms.Lesley Nishihira, Project Manager, Development SV( Services Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on October 19,1999. If you have questions 7 about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail,contact Ms.Nishihira at(425)430-7270. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. The date of Wednesday, October 27, 1999, at 7:30 PM, has been set for a variance public hearing to review the proposed variance. The hearing, before the City of Renton's Board of Adjustment (BOA) will be held in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of City Hall, Renton,Washington. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. Interested parties are invited to attend. PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION I I DATE OF APPLICATION: September 30,1999 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: October 5, 1999 DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: October 5, 1999 .... �� ,.,_, i'"-rf�° •' 9'•',0 .lid -,.i d .a.. I 41,; mil. I I ` . ,(.. .i Pr . •.,, ...1•I NOTICE OF APPLICATION t• CITY uF RENTON I. tr Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator October 5, 1999 Ms. Lisa Johnson DLR Group 900 Fourth Avenue, Suite 700 Seattle, WA 98164 SUBJECT: Hazen High School Renovation/Addition Project No. LUA-99-137,SA-A,V-B Dear Ms. Johnson: The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. You will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. The date of Wednesday, October 27, 1999, at 7:30 PM, has been set for a variance public hearing to review the proposed variance. The hearing, before the City of Renton's Board of Adjustment (BOA) will be held in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of City Hall, Renton, Washington. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. Interested parties are invited to attend. Please contact me, at(425)430-7270, if you have any questions. Sincerely, Lesley Nishihira Project Manager cc: Renton School District No.403/Owners acceptance 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, Washington 98055 e CITY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION LAND USE PERMIT MASTER APPLICATION PROPERTY OWNER(S) PROJECT INFORMATION Note: If there is more than one legal owner, please attach an additional,, notarized McBter Application for each owner. PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: NAME: 4 _ H twovAT IONJA p Ifot4'RIir rot4 4xt L. No. 410 PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION: ADDRESS: 11o1 E. t1cau`�hri AveG 12-24 14. 4T}� sn ierr 1,E. rD N ,wAt q$o�/SF� ��� � R��� KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): CITY: ZIP: (�v Li1oZ3o5-9278 TELEPHONE NUMBER: 425 ...2O4s 4470 EXISTING LAND USE(S): APPLICANT (if other than owner) G �_( ,+ PROPOSED LAND USES: 1YP NAME: t'1 l "rePreitrailA914 401061.• SE.roW PPS.. (PA*N51ON UP 1T, I0% 'F#L I COMPANY (if applicable): Jo.% EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: ENibt,i 'Pti'SIGr 5idl�•n�ia1 Sirs -Cal.p+li CMS) Co.P1r#4. ?Ptokl e a e. ADDRESS: PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): CITY: Tfu 1 'a6i ZIP: �_'t T EXISTING ZONING: .(� �I O IVN � l.8P� TELEPHONE NUMBER: 426 �"��4+ZO+ � 10 S '� PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): `-.J CONTACT PERSON "S �. SITE AREA (SQ. FT. OR ACREAGE): NAME: L/ i JOHoi.) A •*.ti COMPANY (if applicable): PR CT VALUE: G.2 million ADDRESS:A Urth Ave ,suite 70 IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? '+� Au 1 PER Flio1Gtlo3 ZONE. 2- CITY: � � ZIP: IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA? TELEPHONE NUMBER: None, oyVr) 2o&-4(s1 -4000 LEGAL UESCF I N ©F PROPERTY tAttach saps sheet if necessary (See alit44heti r ' TYPE tlFAPPLICATION &>FES s • Check!all application types that apply-City staff will determine fees _ANNEXATION • •: ' $ - • SUBDIVISION: ` , ' _ COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT` ,5 ' ` , _ REZONE • $ _ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ _ SPECIAL PERMIT $ _ SHORT PLAT $ ry _TEMPORARY PERMIT 4$, , . . ' —TENTATIVE PLAT $ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT- $ "A . ' ` _ PRELIMINARY PLAT $ •✓SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ 1000-°a — FINAL PLAT .: • . $ _ GRADE & FILL PERMIT $ (NO. CU. YDS: • ,. y •• ;.) r . o_ PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ 1/VARIANCE ' A^ $ 750. (FROM SECTION:`4-22!1lb °t 1 _ PRELIMINARY _WAIVER $ FINAL • _WETLAND PERMIT . . • $ — ROUTINE`VEGETArfIOTI Ry , , c MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ — BINDING SITE PLAN $ ' , °. . SHORELINE REVIEWS: '• , . ' _ SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ ' - CONDITIONAL USE $ 4 °6 _ A. VARIANCE $ • ' ` t — EXEMPTION $No Charcie 5/ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ Q — REVISION .$ q' - , AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP . i I, (Print Name) /preS 7,-6p-.,d4),Asd w eclare that I am (please check one)_the oner of the property involved in'this application, Xthe authorized representative to act for the property owner(please attach proof of authorization), and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in'all.respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. ATTEST: Subscribed and swan to before me, a Notary Public, in and a/o,- c 7, U•6QDi93 • ' . for the State of/11i. :.,,,residing at- (Name of Owner/Represe' ative) , on the,1irhday of I vC,� , ' i 9 / • (Signature of Over/Representative) n�(i (Signature o '����/'ot�ry Public) L (This sect►on to• be completed by City Staff ) City File Number: ` A AAD BSP CAPS •CAP U CPA..CU A CU-H I,L),,A MHP FPUD FP!PP R RVMP SA H SHPL A :'SHPL I-I .SRR' SM SME ;! TP V A V B V-H W . TOTAL FEES $ S 7.� TOTAL POSTAGE PROVIDED $ �. ' .. MASTERAP.DOC REVISED 8/97 ' ''' ° ' w' , , July 26, 1999 City of Renton Development Services Division-Development/Planning 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Attn: Lesley Nishihira 42 5-430-72 70 Project Name: Hazen High School Renovation and Auditorium Addition 1101 Hoquiam Ave. NE, Renton WA 98059 DLR Project#: 73-99-137-00 'Ic 1-2fA4- VN S&HOoU DISTR-t G-r t s TV SE-4 -Je As borip, A NC_1. Project Narrative wELOPMENT P 1. Hazen High School Cl7y OF RELANNIn, 1101 Hoquiam Ave. NE ON Renton,WA 98059 SEP 3 () 1999 Existing high school: Existing northwest building: 24,734 s.f. REcEivED Main building: First floor 155,329 sf(9,412 s.f. remodeled per this scope of work) Second floor 68,977 sf(2,495 s.f. remodeled per this scope of work) Total 224,306 sf (11,907 s.f.remodeled) Auditorium: First floor: 19,500 s.f. (17,400 s.f. of this is new footprint) Second floor: 1,829 s.f. Total site acreage: 33.9 acre (1,478,617 s.f.) 2. Zoning: R-8 3. Current use: high school 4. Special site features: N/A 5. Soil conditions: The existing soil conditions consist of fill brought into the site during the original building construction, and till that is native to the site. Both of these materials are relatively dense and do not allow for much infiltration. The drainage conditions therefore tend to be overland flow to the northeast. Much of the site is already paved and all runoff currently enters the city's storm drainage system through a series of catch basins and manholes interconnected through culverts. 6. Proposed use of the property and scope of the project: The Hazen High School Renovation/Auditorium addition involves the addition of a 650-680 seat auditorium, an existing interior courtyard (one of two) renovated to create a Commons area within the existing school, and renovation to the administrative wing of the existing school. Along the exterior, a plaza will be developed to the Auditorium and Commons, creating a new student entry and connecting the bus drop area and staff/visitor parking. The staff/visitor parking (immediately south of the school) will be reconfigured. The parking located adjacent to the tennis courts will be repaved and restriped. S iteapprovalnarrative092799.doc Page 2 Street improvements in the way of curbs and 5'-0" sidewalks will be added to the west side of 142"d Ave. SE (Hoquiam Avenue). Existing Fire Hydrants will serve the site. Allowable height: 30'-0" or 2 stories Proposed height: 38'-0" to accommodate height required by Auditorium (We are applying for a height variance with this submittal) Allowable building lot coverage: 35% Actual lot coverage: 14% (207,975 s.f./1,478,617 s.f.) Building setback required for R8: 20'-0" Actual setback: 40'-0" 7. Total estimated cost of construction: $6.2 million 8. fill/excavation quantities: 1,2888 cu. Yd. to be exported from below Auditorium Approximately 2,576 cu. Yd. of structural fill to be imported 8. Trees to be removed: Type Size Quantity Sweet gum 12" cal. 13 Sweet gum 20" cal. 27 Deciduous 12"-24" 11 Pine 18"-20" 9 Cherry 24" 2 Proposed new trees: Deciduous 2" cal. 89 Evergreen 6'-8' 18 9. Land to be dedicated to the City: N/A 10. Parking spaces 218 required by code 332 full spaces-existing 8 ADA accessible spaces (E) 351 existing and proposed spaces total 8 ADA accessible spaces 16 compact spaces-existing and proposed 375 total existing and proposed spaces (We are seeking parking modification w/this submittal) DLR Group Seattle,Washington tel 206/461-6000 fax 206/461/6049 � DLR Group 900 Fourth Avenue, Suite 700 July 26, 1999 Seattle, WA 98164-1006 tel 206/461-6000 City of Renton fax 206/461-6049 Development Services Division Seattle@dlrgroup.com 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Attn: Lesley Nishihira 42 5-430-72 70 Project Name: Hazen High School Renovation and Auditorium Addition 1101 Hoquiam Ave. NE, Renton WA 98059 DLR Project#: 73-99-137-00 ;VELOPMENT PIANNIn CITY OF RENTON Request for parking modification: � Existing parking spaces—full- 332 spaces SEP W,7 Existing stalls ADA accessible-8 Full Parking stalls existing and proposed-351 RECEIVED ADA accessible stalls-existing and proposed-8 Compact stalls-existing and proposed-16 Total number of stalls-375 The allowable spaces, mimimum and maximum per the zoning code is 218. As evident by the survey and the proposed site/landscape plans-the spaces included in this proposed count are located at various areas throughout the site. Much of the increase in parking spaces has been a result of restriping the southernmost lot by the tennis courts and the southern lot directly adjacent to the main building to reflect 90 degree parking versus angled parking, which provides additional spaces. Due to relocation of a student entrance through the addition of the auditorium and the remodeled Commons, these restriped spaces are providing spaces closer to the new entrance for daytime use, and to the auditorium for after school and evening performance functions. There is not anticipated to be an increase in number of trips to the site, but rather a change in the locations on site where parking will occur. The southern lot will provide a lot for students, freeing space for visitors in front of the main entrance. In the evening, this lot will provide parking adjacent to the auditorium. We feel that the proposal will: A) meet the objectives, safety, function, appearance, environmental protection and maintainability intended by the Code requirements. Aisle dimensions are maintained, and pedestrian access and landscape buffers are in excess of the code and provide a safe and well designed environment throughout each portion of the proposed development. B) Each separate area has been designed for safe entrance and exiting of the site, utilizing existing curb cuts so as not to impact adjacent properties in the vicinity. Street improvements will be added to the district side of the street, allowing for increased safety for the neighbors, while not infringing upon their property. C) The parking on the Hazen site serves a multitude of uses that occur at varying times of the day. The parking provided adjacent to the auditorium is intended to serve the requirements per the intent and the purpose of the code. D) By adding the auditorium addition necessitates that additional parking be provided immediately adjacent to it. Since existing parking areas were utilized to achieve this, we feel that this is justified and required for the intended use. The auditorium and school activities are nonconcurrent uses. Seattle Appleton Colorado Springs Denver Des Moines Farmington Honolulu Kansas City Milwaukee Minneapolis Omaha Overland Park Philadelphia Phoenix Pierre Portland Sioux Falls Tampa LTR.071999parking modification.doc DLR Group E) Due to this reuse of existing parking areas and curb cuts, we feel that this addition will not create adverse impacts to other properties in the vicinity. Its convenient location to the areas in which it serves may in fact alleviate some of the conflict of on-street parking that might have been faced without this parking on site. Please contact us if you have any additional questions. Sincerely, DLR Group 1 Lisa K.Johnson , IA Associate in the Firm cc: File LKJ/ctt DLR Group Seattle,Washington tel 206/461-6000 fax 206/461/6049 LDLR Group 900 Fourth Avenue, Suite 700 July 26, 1999 Seattle, WA 98164-1006 tel 206/461-6000 City of Renton fax 206/461-6049 Development Services Division seattle@dlrgroup.com 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Attn: Lesley Nishihira 425-430-7270 Project Name: Hazen High School Renovation and Auditorium Addition 1101 Hoquiam Ave. NE, Renton WA 98059 VELOPMENT PLANNIK DLR Project#: 73-99-137-00 CITY OF RENTON SEP 3 n 4gg9 Justification for variance request: RECEivEb Hearing Examiner/Board of Adjustment: We would like to request a variance with regard to allowable height. Within the R-8 zone, the height is restricted 30'-0" or 2 stories. Due to the height required to house an auditorium w/ full height stage, the height of the auditorium space would need to exceed this height by 8'-0" for a total height of 38'-0". As shown on the elevations submitted, the main elevation of the both the new and existing school complies with this the 30'-0" requirement for the majority of its elevation. It is only in the area required by the raised parapet over the auditorium and stage where the limit needs to be exceeded. A height of 30'-0" does not provide adequate height for this proposed use. There are areas of the existing school with similar conditions. In the existing building the elevation of the fan room (shown on A5.1) is 33'-3" as shown, where the function of the space has required a larger area. At the large instruction room to the north of the school, the building height is 36'-0" where the height was required to provide a lecture hall environment. The smokestack, which we will be removing as part of this scope, is currently closer to 100'to 120'. Much care has gone into coordinating the massing of the new addition with the existing building so that it ties into the existing school in mass and material. We feel it is consistent with the guidelines and codes by which the existing school have been built. As you review the elevations, you will see that the height of the school's main exterior throughout is consistently at 30'-0". The auditorium building complies w/ this rule, extending past it only where necessary for the function. Because of the stepped terrace at the entrance, it is only when the measurement is taken from the lowest terrace to the top of the highest parapet that the dimension becomes 38'-0". The relative height at the upper terrace is 34'-0". A) As indicated in the previous description, the compliance to the 30'-0" maximum height would be an undue hardship as it does not allow the function of the proposed auditorium to occur. We feel that the strict application of this Code would not be in keeping of what is permissible for a secondary school building with this zoning classification. B) The granting of a variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property. The auditorium has been designed by comply with the 1997 Uniform Building Code, and to meet all requirements as required by its area, height, building type and its specific requirements governing stages and assembly spaces within those sections of the Uniform Building Code. Seattle Appleton Colorado Springs Denver Des Moines Farmington Honolulu Kansas City Milwaukee Minneapolis Omaha Overland Park Philadelphia Phoenix Pierre Portland Sioux Falls Tampa LTR.071999variance request.doc LDLR Group C) We feel that this minimum variance does not constitute a special privilege inconsistent w/a secondary school use in an R-8 zone as shown by the existing high school. D) Approval of this variance would accomplish the height required for building an auditorium. The variance for height will be minimal in that it will be applied to the parapet area where this additional height is absolutely necessary to achieve the required function required by an auditorium. Please contact us if you have any additional questions. Sincerely, DLR Group • ik Lisa K.Johns , AIA Associate in the Firm cc: File LKJ/ctt II DLR Group Seattle,Washington tel 206/461-6000 fax 206/461/6049 July 26, 1999 City of Renton Development Services Division-Development/Planning 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Attn: Lesley Nishihira 425-430-72 70 Project Name: Hazen High School Renovation and Auditorium Addition 1101 Hoquiam Ave. NE, Renton WA 98059 DLR Project#: 73-99-137-00 Construction Mitigation Description Proposed construction dates (begin and end dates): March 22, 2000 through June 21, 2001. Hours of operation: Working hours will be limited to between 7am and 7pm. Site will be accessed through the existing curb cuts throughout construction. See attached phasing plan. Sedimentation control measures will be implemented on site to mitigate erosion control. v Pp'NNWr N���PM ON�oN StR G° c092799.doc LEGEND NOTES ;UST 2001 AREA A TYPE 1 ;UST 2001 C A"GTu' GULLY SPRRROEREO AREA ER PPE I OCCUPANCY A2.1 ETLLY SPRNOARED AREA C IWE 1 OCCWANCY E-I NUT SPRRROFREU LEOENO i MUR MILL OCCUPHKT SEPARATKIN --- ARE CR RATER STAGE CURTNN 1 HOUR[CUP/At-1 E //A iAH,,Te.urED • ASSIARD PROPERTY UNE Co C 0 Cu 0 --- C Q) 0 0 0 1: 0 1 ,C D - C) C Y a) N D 6 .q gi KEY PLAN De 2 G PLAN Bo vrolk. GiA0Ot Capital Projects Office '� FACILITIES AND OPERATIONS CENTER Telephone: (206) 204-4470 Fax: (206) 204-4476 403 September 30, 1999 Ms. Lesley Nishihira, Assistant Planner City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Dear Lesley: This letter is in response to the Preapplication Supplemental Information Memorandum of August 19, 1999. As part of our application, we are asking for a deferral regarding any additional sanitary sewer improvements. Please consider the following: The addition to Hazen High School is only adding the Theatre/Auditorium and related spaces that was anticipated in the original design, but not completed until now due to the lack of funding. Also, this addition ties into the school's existing on-site utilities and does not require any new sewer services. Further, due to the school's location and the terrain, the requested sanitary sewer improvements would not serve anyone, has been unneeded over the past 30-years since the school was built, and only of value to future development in the county. Therefore, the Renton School District hereby requests that this project receive a Deferral of Required Improvements per RCM 4-9-060 specifically for the off-site sanitary sewer improvements requested. We understand that the District's participation in these improvements may be required at a future time when the city expansion and development of adjacent property currently in the county may require it. However, at this time since we are at the city limits and the requested services would not be serving anyone, we feel that to take funding away from the school project is unnecessary and not in the interest of the Renton taxpayer. Sincerely, Gl`I Y ul� i:Li.,1 17 pD Mike Torgerson J Facilities Project Manager 1220 North 4th Street, Renton,Washington 98055 tie CZ TON 9( - 7b I.- CITY OF RENTON b l sTRI CT t S LP-#cD ' ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST P [ G` ' - Instructions for Applicants � This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best descriptions you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts . If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write Ado not know@ or Adoes not apply. @ Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations . Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe you proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. =VELOPMENT PLANNi°• A. BACKGROUND "` CITY OF RENTON 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Hazen High School Renovation & Addition E VEC 2 . Name of Applicant: Renton School District 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Capital Projects Office 1220 No. 4th Street, Renton, WA 98134 4 . Date Checklist prepared: July 19, 1999 5. Agency requesting checklist : City of Renton 6. Proposed timing or schedule: March 2000 , completion June 2001. 7 . Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain Athletic Field Improvements 8 . List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal, if known. None Environmental Checklist - page 2 9 . Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by you proposal? If yes, explain. No. 10 . List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for you proposal, if known. Building Permit, City of Renton 11 . Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of you proposal . You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Proposal to renovate Hazen High School involves an addition of a 650-680 seat auditorium (21,328 SF) , a new Commons Area within the existing building and courtyard (11,907 SF) and renovations to the existing administrative wing (9, 971 SF) . 12 . Location of the proposal . Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site (s) . Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. 1101 Hoquiam Ave. N.E. , Renton, WA 98059 The legal description is as follows : The east half of the east half of the northeast quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 10 Township 13 North, Range 5 %! East, W.M. , in King County, Washington, except the North and South 30 feet thereof: Also the North half of the west half of the east half of the northeast quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 10 Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. in King County, Washington, except the North 275 feet thereof, and except that portion conveyed to King County for street purposes by deed recorded under auditor's file No. 6387732: Also The west half of the northwest quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 east, W.M. , King County Washington, except the North, South, and East 30 feet thereof: also except north 132 feet of the South 264 feet of the North three-fourths of the southwest quarter of the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter of the said Environmental Checklist - page 3 section 10 . B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1 . Earth a. General description of the site (circle one) : Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other Terraced. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope) ? 5. 6% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck) ? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Glacial Till d. Are the surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe . No e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill . Structural fill will be placed under the new auditorium and parking lot. Commercial local source. 2,576 cy import and 1288 cu. Yd export f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction or use? If so, generally describe. Not if adequate best management practices are used. If BMP=s are not used, erosion potential is low. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or building) ? 40% (Building footprint/vehicular/nonvehicular) h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Silt fence, gravel construction entrance, sediment trap in accordance with the City of Renton Standards. 2 . Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i .e. , dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Construction equipment exhaust. No Burning will be Environmental Checklist - page 4 permitted. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Dust control by watering. 3 . Water a. Surface: 1) Is the any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands) ? If yes, describe type and provide names . If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. None 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. N/A 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material . N/A 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Environmental Checklist - page 5 No 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals . . . ; agricultural; etc. ) . Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable) , or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None c. Water Runoff (including storm water) : 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known) . Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe . Storm water runoff from new parking areas and new building areas will be collected by tightlined system, detained, routed through a biofiltration swale and discharged to the City of Renton underground piped system in 142nd Ave. S.E. (Hoquiam Ave. N.E. ) . 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe . No d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Biofiltration swale for water quality and detention tank with control structure for runoff control. 4 . Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: X deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other X evergreen tree : fir, cedar, pine, other X shrubs X grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plant: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants : water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other X other types of vegetation weeds b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Grass, trees and shrubs will be removed in areas of new Environmental Checklist - page 6 building, and parking construction. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None Environmental Checklist - page 7 d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: New landscaping will be provided around parking areas and school building. Native plant materials will be used. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: crow mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: Squirrels fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site . None c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project=s energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Gas fired furnaces will be added to heat new spaces. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe . No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impact, if any: Will use energy-saving measures to reduce HVAC system energy use. 7 . Environmental Health a. Are the any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemical, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe . No Environmental Checklist - page 8 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required: None 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None ji b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other) ? None 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other) ? indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short-term noise would be associated with demolition and construction of buildings during daylight hours, weekdays. Long term noise would be those associated with school during daylight hours, weekdays. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None 8 . Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? School facilities located on the site; adjacent properties are residential and undeveloped parcels. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No c. Describe any structures on the site. Existing Hazen High School d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? R-8 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Residential single-family (RS) Environmental Checklist - page 9 g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an Aenvironmentally sensitive@ area? If so, specify. None known I . Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? -1400 students + 100 staff j . Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None 1 . Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Preliminary project review with City of Renton Development Services Division. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. None b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None 10 . Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure ' s) , not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material (s) proposed? The tallest height of the proposed structure is approximately 38' from finished floor to top of parapet. The principal exterior building material will be brick veneer to match the existing exterior. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None Environmental Checklist - page 10 b. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None Environmental Checklist - page 11 11 . Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Fluorescent lighting in classrooms, normally 8 am to 4 pm, weekdays . b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None d. Proposed measure to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any? Cut off louvers on site lighting to reduce impact of lighting on neighboring properties . 12 . Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? School Athletic Fields b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None 13 . Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. None known b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None known c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None Environmental Checklist - page 12 14 . Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. 142'd Ave. S.E. (Hoquiam Ave. N.E. ) serves the site, existing and proposed driveways will allow access. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes, 0 distance, High School serviced by Metro Transit dial-up van service directly to the school (Route 808- 425-254-4701) . C. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? PIA The proposed number of stalls is 351 stalls (332 existing/8ADA accessible) . No stalls would be eliminated. 3754-0b4 ¶to US trll. (44011 eg St met 4 pra,poledi d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private) . None e . Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe . No f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Minimal increase as students and staff are same number to presently access this site. Evening trips would increase for Auditorium use, approximately 2-"3 nights per week. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any. None 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other) ? If so, generally describe. No b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on Environmental Checklist - page 13 public services, if any. No Environmental Checklist - page 14 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: Electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, cable T.V. , other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. City of Renton Utilities/WD 90 C. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge . I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: /dial-a/ )r . AL�!�44Q--2 Date Submitted: 9/„21/9 j • MEMORANDUM r 'VjV DATE: -/!r 2- a ! �9 TO: Construction Services, Fire Prevention, Plan, Review, Project Planner FROM: Jana Hanson, Development Services Division Director SUBJECT: New Preliminary Application: =L kIGU SWOL REt• —Mi1067 LOCATION: tot tInGXYAM 4\U tQC CT1at. PREAPP NO. �`I —(S A meeti w' h the applicant has been scheduled for 11 z A , Thursday, AU� kLtU , in one of the 6th floor conference rooms (new City Hall). If this meeting is scheduled at 10:00 AM, the MEETING MUST BE CONCLUDED PRIOR TO 11:00 AM to allow time to prepare for the 11:00 AM meeting. Please review the attached project plans prior to the scheduled meeting with the applicant. You will not need to do a thorough "permit level" review at this time. Note only major issues that must be resolved prior to formal land use and/or building permit application submittal. Please submit your written comments to LAU IR cOjQ( at least two (2) days before the meeting. Thank you. ciryOF REN tilN���, SEP 3 n 19 99 �EQ • �Y C� CITY OF RENTON FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU MEMORANDUM DATE: August 5, 1999 TO: Laureen Nicolay, Planner FROM: Jim Gray, Assistant Fire Marshal,, SUBJECT: Hazen High School Addition, 1101 Hoquiam.Av NE Fire Department Comments: 1. The preliminary Fire flow is 2750 GPM which requires one fire hydrant within 150 feet of the building and two additional hydrants within 300 feet of the building. 2. The entire new and existing building is required to be fully sprinklered by City Ordinance. 3. A fire mitigation fee of$17,282.20 is required based on $.52 a square ' foot of the new building square footage. 4. Separate plans and permits are required for the fire alarm and sprinkler systems. . Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. HAZEN HIGH SCHOOL PREAPPLICATION August 11, 1999 Page 2 of 3 WATER: • The site is located in the Aquifer Protection Zone 2. • The project siteis located in the 565 Pressure Zone. • There is an existing 12" watermain in the (unimproved) right-of-way of NE 12th St. This watermain is a line that deadends at a fire hydrant. See City of Renton drawing #903 for the AsBuilt engineering plans. • Per the City of Renton Fire Marshall, the preliminary fire flow for this project is 2750 GPM. Per the City of Renton code, fireflows that exceed 2500 GPM require the installation of a looped watermain around the building or complex of buildings. It appears that the site is currently served by Water District 90. The following comments are from the Water Division following my discussion with them on this matter. The subject property is within the City of Renton's water service area established by the East King County Coordinated Water System plan, which was approved by King County and by the Department of Health. Water District 90 (WD 90) currently provides water to the property from an existing waterline located in Hoquiam Ave NE (a.k.a. 142nd Ave. SE). The City of Renton currently has a 12-inch water main located in NE 12th St and Duvall Ave. NE. In order for the City to provide water service to Hazen high school property, the property owner or school district will be required to install a substantial amount of water main extension along Duvall Ave NE, NE 12th St. extension and around the high school buildings. These improvements may not be economically feasible at the present time for the proposed addition to the school. Therefore, the City will allow WD 90 to continue to provide water service to the school on a temporary basis subject to the following conditions: • Execution of a temporary water service area between Renton and WD 90 that will identify Renton as the long-term water service provider to the property and WD 90 as a temporary water service provider. • Execution of a temporary water service agreement between Renton and the School District for the future extension of Renton's water mains. • WD 90 will provide assurance to Renton that the district's water system can provide the required fire flow demand for the improvements as determined by Renton Fire Department. Results of hydrant flow tests and hydraulic analyses of the district's system shall be submitted to the City. • All water system improvements by WD 90 required for the proposed development shall meet Renton standards. CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works MEMORANDUM DATE: August 12, 1999 TO: Pre-Application File No. 99-65 FROM: Lesley Nishihira, Assistant Planner, x7270\; SUBJECT: Hazen High School Renovation/Addition We have completed a preliminary review of the pre-application for the above-referenced development proposal. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision makers (e.g., Hearing Examiner, Zoning Administrator, Board of Adjustment, Board of Public Works, and City Council). Although every attempt is made to ensure that these comments are complete, a more thorough examination of the project at the time of application submittal may reveal additional issues that may alter these comments or require additional review. I. General The subject property is located at 1101 Hoquiam Avenue NE. The proposed renovations include the addition of a 21,328 square foot auditorium, a new 11,907 square foot Commons area within the existing building and courtyard, 9,971 square feet of renovations to the administrative wing. The proposal will also create a new student entry way and the reconfiguration of the staff/visitor parking are and bus drop. The proposal would be less than a-10% expansion of the building square footage for the existing school. II. Zoning/Development Standards The site is zoned Residential at 8 dwelling units per acre (R-8). The R-8 zone allows for expansions of up to 10% for existing schools with Hearing Examiner Site Plan Approval. The project would be required to satisfy all development standards of the R-8 zone, including setbacks, lot coverage, and height limitations. Setbacks. The proposed addition would be along the site's frontage on Hoquiam Avenue NE. The R-8 zone is required to maintain a 20-foot front yard setback along streets. As shown on the plan, the proposed auditorium would have a setback of 40 feet from this property line—satisfying this requirement. The rear and side yard setbacks for the R-8 zone are not applicable to this proposal. Lot Coverage. Development in the R-8 zone is limited to 35% lot coverage by buildings. Based on the information provided, staff was unable to determine if the proposal satisfies this requirement. In addition to ground floor square footages of the existing school and addition, the total site area as well as the footprint of any accessory structures would be necessary in order to calculate lot coverage by buildings. Building Height. The SEPA checklist indicates a proposed height of approximately 40 feet for the addition —exceeding the maximum permitted height of the zone. Building height in the R-8 zone is restricted to 30 feet or 2 stories. However, the Zoning Administrator has determined that the development standards applicable to community facilities with a (P) suffix would apply to the subject proposal. These standards (attached)would allow the building to exceed the height limit of the zone by a specified amount provided the proposal satisfies specific requirements. Parking. Senior high schools are required to provide one parking space for each employee plus one space for every 10 students. In addition to the required spaces, one off-street space of an adequate size is required for any buses used for transportation. The SEPA checklist submitted indicates that PRE99651 0 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 1800 COLUMBIA. CENTER,701 5TH AVE,SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104 Order No.: 000537486 PROPERTY ADDRESS: WASHINGTON Your No.: HAZEN HIGH SCHOOL i. i.L. h n n n RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT NO.403 1220 NORTH 4T J U N H STREET 1 1999 RENTON,WASHINGTON 98055 L ATTN: KATHA4 1/1 Enclosed are your materials on the above transaction. If you have any questions regarding these materials, please contact us. Thank you for this opportunity to serve you. ««««««««««««««««««<»»>»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»> UNIT 10 -YOUR COMPLETE BUILDER/DEVELOPER SERVICE CENTER WE HAVE EXPANDED TO SERVE ALL YOUR TITLE • INSURANCE NEEDS RELATED TO LAND ACQUISITION.DEVELOPMENT FINANCING AND PROPERTY SUBDIVISION. MIKE HARRIS TITLE OFFICER (206)628-5623 (E-MAIL:HARRISMI@CTT.COM) KEITH EISENBREY TITLE OFFICER (206)628-8377 (E-MAIL:EISENBREYK@CTT.COM) STEVE KINSELLA .. CONDO COORDINATOR (206)628-5614 (E-MAIL:KINSELLAS@CTT.COM) CHRIS JOHANSON SENIOR TITLE EXAMINER BOB BLOEDEL SENIOR TITLE EXAMINER FAX NUMBER (206)628-5657 City Cs • CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY mt Fn [znnioz99 t ( t CHICAGO TITLE SSURANCE COMPANY 1800 COLUMBIA CENTER,7015TH AVE,SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98104 PHONE: 628-8377 FAX: (206)628-5657 ORDER NO: 537486 YOUR NO: HAZEN HIGH SCHOOL UNIT NO: 10 LOAN NO: , SUPPLEMENTAL COMMITMENT X ORDER REFERENCE INFORMATION SUPPLEMENTAL NUMBER 1 SELLER: PURCHASER/BORROWER: RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT LOAN NUMBER: PROPERTY ADDRESS: WASHINGTON Our Title Commitment dated 04/28/99 at 8 :00 A.M. is supplemented as follows : r THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION SET FORTH IN PARAGRAPH FOUR OF SCHEDULE A OF OUR COMMITMENT HAS BEEN AMENDED AS FOLLOWS: SEE EXHIBIT ATTACHED. z EXCEPT AS TO THE MATTERS SET FORTH HEREINABOVE, THE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY COVERED BY THIS ORDER HAS NOT BEEN REEXAMINED. AA JUNE 10, 1999 AUTHORIZED BY: KEITH EISENBREY CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY SUPPL-COM/RDA/0399 I CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Order No.: 537486 LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL A: THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE S)UTH 30 FEET THEREOF CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR ROAD BY DEFD RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 4797337; ALSO EXCEPT THE NORTH 30 FEET THEREOF. • PARCEL B: THE NORTH HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE NORTH 30 FEET FOR ROAD; AND • THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE NORTH 30 FEET THEREOF FOR ROAD; ALSO EXCEPT THE SOUTH 30 FEET THEREOF CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR ROAD PURPOSES BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 4836103 . PARCEL C: THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE NORTH 15 FEET; ALSO • EXCEPT THE SOUTH 132 FEET OF THE EAST 330 FEET THEREOF; ALSO EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING WITHIN THE EAST 30 FEET OF SAID SUBDIVISION CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR ROAD BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 3262476 . CHICAGO I i 1LE INSURANCE COMPANY 1ega1:/r1m/1218 96 "HICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMP. Policy No.: 537486 EXTENDED MORTGAGEE LEASEHOLD POLICY SCHEDULE A (Continued) LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL D: THE NORTH HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION SECTION 10, •TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE NORTH 275 FEET THEREOF; ALSO EXCEPT THE WEST 42 FEET THEREOF CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 6387732. PARCEL E: THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE NORTH 30 FEET AND THE EAST 30 FEET FOR ROAD; ALSO EXCEPT THE EAST 200 FEET OF THE NORTH 170 FEET OF THE REMAINDER; TOGETHER WITH THE NORTH 15 FEET OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE EAST 30 FEET THEREOF CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR ROAD PURPOSES BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 3262476 . PARCEL F: THE EAST 200 FEET OF THE NORTH 170 FEET OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED TRACT: THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN • KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE NORTH 30 FEET AND THE EAST 30 FEET THEREOF. PARCEL G: • THE EAST 90 FEET OF THE WEST 180 FEET OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED TRACT: THE NORTH THREE-QUARTERS OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY ^TIICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPA Policy No.: 537486 EXTENDED MORTGAGEE LEASEHOLD POLICY SCHEDULE A (Continued) LEGAL DESCRIPTION MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE SOUTH 264 FEET THEREOF. • PARCEL H: THE SOUTH 132 FEET Or THE NORTH THREE-QUARTERS OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE • NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE EAST 30 FEET THEREOF CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY BY PUBLIC ROAD BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 3261884 . PARCEL I: THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF THE EAST 30 FEET THEREOF CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR ROAD BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 3261884; ALSO EXCEPT THE SOUTH 30 FEET THEREOF CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR ROAD PURPOSES BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 4828068 . PARCEL J: THE WEST 150 FEET OF THE SOUTH 132 FEET OF THE EAST 330 FEET OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. PARCEL K: THE NORTH 30 FEET OF THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. PARCEL L: THE NORTH THREE-QUARTERS OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY ( '-TICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMP)_ Policy No.: 537486 EXTENDED MORTGAGEE LEASEHOLD POLICY SCHEDULE A (Continued) LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXCEPT THE EAST 30 FEET CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR ROAD BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 3261884; ALSO EXCEPT THE SOUTH 264 FEET; ALSO EXCEPT THE EAST 90 FEET OF THE WEST 180 FEET OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THAT PORTION OF SAID NORTH THREE-QUARTERS LYING NORTHERLY OF SAID SOUTH 264 FEET. , - PARCEL M: THE EAST 180 FEET OF THE SOUTH 132 FEET OF THE EAST 330 FEET OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE EAST 30 FEET CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR ROAD PURPOSES BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 3262476 . PARCEL N: THE SOUTH 530 FEET OF TRACT 6, JOSEPH P. MARSHALL TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 38 OF PLATS, PAGE 30, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Comr) kr 1J 1 GEOTECHNICAL REPORT PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS 1HAZEN HIGH SCHOOL 1 C..) RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 403 RENTON, WASHINGTON ti i 4 .s PacRim Project No. 079-001 May 12, 1999 Ca...) H . p NNIn ✓/ELOPMENT P� CITY OF REN�N Cori I SEP $ 199 1 RECENE'D C-11 U Pm"( , geotechnical engineering and applied "` earth sciences ,I �► TACIZIM GEOTECHNICAL I `w GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING AND APDLIED EARTH SCIENCES 1 10700 Meridian Ave. N., Suite 210• Seattle, WA 98133-Phone: (206) 365-8770•Fax: (206) 365-8405 May 12, 1999 PacRim Project No. 079-001 Renton School District No. 403 Capital Projects Office 1220 North Fourth Street ti Renton, Washington 98055 :.: Attention: Mr. Mike Torgerson IGeotechnical Report Proposed Modifications Hazen High School Renton School District No. 403 Renton, Washington I Dear Mr. Torgerson: I Submitted herewith is our Geotechnical Report, Proposed Modifications, Hazen High School, Renton School District No. 403, Renton, Washington. This geotechnical study was based on the scope of work outlined in our proposal dated March 30, 1999. At your request, additional copies of this report have also been transmitted to DLR Group. IWe appreciate the opportunity to provide geotechnical engineering services for this project. If you have any questions regarding the attached report, please do not hesitate to call Mike Byers or me at (206) 365-8770. Yours very truly, d PACRIM GEOTECHNICAL INC. v Harbans L. Chabra Principal 1 f: Hazen_HS rl.doc 71 1 1 GEOTECHNICAL REPORT .-I PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS I i HAZEN HIGH SCHOOL — RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 403 3 RENTON, WASHINGTON ri INTRODUCTION k • --1 At your request, PacRim Geotechnical Inc. (PacRim) performed a geotechnical engineering study related to the proposed modifications at Hazen High School, located at 1101 Hoquim LI Avenue Northeast in Renton, Washington. The approximate location of the project and general I site layout are shown on the Vicinity Map and the Site and Exploration Plan, Figure-1 and 2 respectively—The purpose of the geotechnical study was to explore and evaluate the surface and subsurface conditions at the site, and based on the conditions observed, provide recommendations pertaining to geotechnical aspects of the project. The proposed modifications include construction of a new auditorium, a paved parking lot, a paved bus drop-off-area, and installation of associated underground utilities. The location of the proposed auditorium is near the southeast corner of the existing school building complex, as indicated on IFigure 2. The proposed auditorium will have concrete slab-on-grade floors with exterior walls and columns supported on strip and spread footings. The proposed parking lot is south of the school, on property that the school district is in the process of acquiring. The proposed bus drop-off area will be near the northeast corner of the existing school building, in the vicinity of boring B-5 (see Figure 2). We understand the parking lot and bus drop off area will be paved with asphaltic concrete I pavement(ACP). As part of the auditorium and parking area construction, storm drain utilities will be installed. Storage capacity of the storm drain system will be provided by over sizing the pipes; no detention ponds or sedimentation basins are planned. We anticipate underground utilities will 1-1 be installed at depths of less than about 6 feet. 4 ,1 The scope of work for this geotechnical study was outlined in our proposal dated March 30, 1999, which was subsequently authorized by Renton School District No. 403 by Purchase Order No. 94320. Our work was accomplished in general accordance with our proposal. The scope of the geotechnical study generaltyyincluded a field exploration program, laboratory testing, geotechnical analyses, and preparation of this letter report. We note that our proposal included six borings. One of our borings,planned in the area of the proposed parking-lot(south of the school property), was not completed because the school district had not purchased the-property by the time of our investigation. The subsurface conditions in that area will be explored at a later date with a backhoe test pit. After our test pit has been completed, I Hazen HS rl.doc PACRIM GEOTECHNICAL INC. i PacRim Project No. ( 001 May 12. 1999 • will supply an addendum to this report describ ig encountered subsurface conditions and geotechnical recommendations related to the parking lot, as necessary. SITE CONDITIONS SURFACE CONDITIONS The school property is situated in a residential area on a north-south trending ridge in the Renton Highlands. The general topography in the site vicinity slopes mildly downward to the west, north and east. The site topography is generally composed of two relatively flat terraces separated by an approximately 5-foot high, east-west oriented bench near the middle of the property. The maximum elevation change across the property is on the order of about 10 feet. The proposed areas of development are relatively level lawn areas. r,. FIELD EXPLORATION AND LABORATORY TESTING On April 15 and 16, 1999, PacRim personnel conducted a subsurface explorations program at the site. This program consisted of drilling and sampling five exploratory borings (B-1 through B-5) to depths ranging from about 11 Y to 161/2 feet below the existing eround surface. Approximate locations of the explorations are shown on Figure 2. The exploratory borings were logged by a PacRim representative, whe also o&tai'ned soil samples at selected depth intervals in each of the borings. Appendix A contains summary logs of the exploratory borings and describes the field exploration methodology in greater detail. Laboratory tests were conducted on selected soil samples to characterize certain physical properties of the on-site soils. Laboratory testing included determination of moisture content, dry density, and grain size distribution. Testing of soil samples was conducted in our laboratory in general accordance with latest revision of appropriate American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) standards. Moisture content and dry density test results are displayed on the appropriate summary boring logs in Appendix A. Grain size distribution test results are presented in Appendix B. REGIONAL GEOLOGY AND SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS A published geologic map*of the project area (Waldren et. al., 1962,Preliminary Geologic Map of Seattle and Vicinity, Washington, Map 1-354, U.S.G.S.) indicates that, on a regional level, the site underlain by glacial till. Soils defined as glacial till typically consist of a heterogeneous, non-sorted mixture of sub-rounded boulders, cobbles, gravel, and sand in a matrix of silt and clay. The heterogeneous nature of the till is a result of it being mixed and transported before being deposited. Glacial till can be defined as lodgement till or ablation till, depending on whether the till has been overridden by glacial ice. Lodgement till is glacial till that has been overridden by one or more glacial advances, and is typically very dense and relatively Horn HS rI.doc 2 PACR1NI GEOTECHNICAL INC. :' PacRim Project No. 079-OC' '' May 12. 1999 i impervious. Ablation till was deposited as glaciers were retreating from the area, and therefore and was not overridden by glacial ice. Although ablation till can be similar to lodgement till in ., appearance, it is generally less dense and not as competent as the glacially consolidated lodgement till. 1 During our exploration program, a thin, surficial topsoil layer was encountered in all borings. 4 Beneath the topsoil, a relatively thin layer of undocumented fill was encountered in all borings. The undocumented fill was underlain by lodgement or ablation till, except in boring B-5,where it was underlain by recessional outwash, which in turn was underlain by lodgement till. The lodgement or ablation till was underlain by relatively fine-grained, glacially overridden sediments in boring B-3. Below are descriptions of the soil deposits encountered in our `} explorations in the order of stratigraphic sequence by which they were deposited, with the youngest unit described first. • Undocumented Fill—Undocumented fill was encountered beneath a thin topsoil layer in all borings. These soils consisted of medium dense silt and silty sand with j varying amounts of gravel and organic material. In boring B-5, the undocumented fill consisted of very soft organic silt and stiff silt. The thiclmess of the t undocumented fill ranged from about %-foot in boring B-2 to about 4 '/z feet in borings B-1 and B-5. The thickness of the undocumented fill was about 2 feet in borings B-3 and B-4. We presume the thicker layers of fill near borings B-1 and B-5 are related to foundation backfilling for the existing building and landscaping, respectively. Undocumented fill is characterized by varying consistency, low to moderate shear strength and moderate to high, variable compressibility. The 2 undocumented fill encountered in our explorations are considered moisture sensitive due to their relatively high fines content, where fines are defined as silt and clay material passing the U.S. Standard No. 200 sieve. I • Recessional Outwash—Recessional outwash was encountered beneath the undocumented fill in boring B-5. This material extended to a depth of about 8 feet, ,!-.1 and consisted of stiff silt with a trace of sand. Recessional outwash is characterized by low to moderate shear strength, moderate compressibility and moisture sensitivity. I • Ablation Till —Ablation till was encountered beneath the undocumented fill in borings B-2 and B-4,and varied in thickness from 3 to 4 feet. The Ablation till r i; consisted of loose t2S medium dense silty sand with gravel. Ablation till is characterized by moderate shear strength, low to moderate compressibility and moisture sensitivity. -1 • Lodgement Till - Lodgement till was encountered to the total depth explored in all borings except boring B-3, where it extended to a depth of 7'/z feet and was underlain Iby glacially overridden sediments. This material consisted of very dense, silty sand with gravel. Lodgement till is characterized by high shear strength, low 1 Hazen HS_rI.doc 3 PACRIM1 GEOTECHNICAL INC -# PacRim Project No. 0 01 May 12. 1999 compressibility and moisture sensitivity. Occasional silt interbeds were encountered within the lodgement till, suggesting that depositions of the fill occurred in an area that may have been influenced by glacial melt water streams. • Glacially Overridden Sediments—Glacially overridden sediments were encountered in boring B-3 beneath the lodgement till. These sediments consisted of dense sand with silt and hard sandy silt, and are characterized by high shear strength, low compressibility and moisture sensitivity. Groundwater was encountered at a depth of about 9 and 10 feet in borings B-2 and B-3, respectively. It should be noted that the borings were completed towards the end of the wet season, and we anticipate that the groundwater conditions on-site will change in response to rainfall, time of year and other factors. Perched groundwater conditions often occur within undocumented fill and above relatively low permeability, silty layers, particularly during the wet season. We expect that perched groundwater could occur during and after periods of precipitation at the interface of the lodgement till and the overlying soils. Given the relatively impermeable nature of the near surface soil across the site, we expect that temporary ponding of surface water could occur during and after precipitation events, and during the wet season. • CONCLUSIONS AND RECOivD ENDATIONS The results of our study indicate that the site is suitable for the proposed development,provided the recommendations presented herein are followed. The foundation supporting soil for the proposed auditorium is relatively close to the existing ground surface, and shallow spread footings are suitable. The pavement subgrade for the proposed bus turn around will require some special preparation to support the anticipated loads. Once the surficial vegetation is stripped from the site, the exposed soil is generally fine-grained and considered highly moisture sensitive. This could result in increased construction costs if earthwork is conducted during periods of wet weather. The exposed soil will also be susceptible to erosion during periods of wet weather. Suitability of the onsite soil for structural fill will also depend on weather during excavation and placement, and the contractor's care protecting the'exposed soil from moisture. Recommendations provided throughout this report specifically address design and construction of the proposed development given the subsurface conditions encountered in our explorations. SITE EARTHWORK Subgrade Preparation Subgrade preparation in areas supporting new fills, structures, and asphalt pavement should begin with the removal (stripping) of all deleterious matter, pavement, vegetation, and existing undocumented fill soil Old foundations and utilities should be removed from the proposed building foundation area. The depth of stripping can best be determined in the field when the soil is exposed, but for estimation purposes, the stripping depth in the footprint of the auditorium Hazen HS rl.doc 4 PACRIM GEOTECHNICAL INC. PacRim Project No. 0 7 9-001 May 12. 1999 will be on the order of 1 to 2 feet. We expect that thicker fill will be encountered next to the existing buildings. Exposed subgrade soils should be evaluated by the geotechnical engineer. For large areas, this evaluation should be performed by proof-rolling the exposed subgrade with a fully loaded dump 3 truck. For smaller areas where access is restricted, the subgrade should be evaluated by probing the soil with a steel probe. Soft/loose soils identified by the geotechnical engineer during subgrade preparation should be compacted to a firm and unyielding condition or over-excavated and replaced with structural fill, as described below. The depth of overexcavation, if required, should be evaluated by a qualified geotechnical engineer at the time of construction. Following the recommended proof-rolling and over-excavation pc©cess, a geotextile separator may be required in the vicinity of the proposed bus turn around area to stabilize portions of the subgrade prior to fill placement. Additional pavement support recommendations for this area are presented later in this report. Structural Fill Materials and Compaction Based on the results of our field exploration and laboratory testing program, we anticipate the on-site topsoil and undocumented fill will not be suitable for re-use as structural fill due to the high fines and organic content. These soils may be used as general fill in areas not sensitive to settlement, or for landscaping applications. Ablation till generally has a relatively high natural moisture content (probably above optimum moisture content) and may require moisture conditioning to be suitable for use as structural fill. Moisture conditioning can require extended periods of dry weather and sufficient room onsite to spread the material out to facilitate drying. Therefore, for planning purposes, we suggest that ablation till be considered unsuitable for reuse as structural fill. 71 Lodgement till is generally found near its optimum moisture content, and is suitable for re-use as structural fill provided it is placed and compacted while it is within 2 percent of its optimum moisture content. This can be accomplished during dry weather, but is very difficult during wet weather conditions. Therefore, if construction occurs during dry weather, lodgement till will likely be suitable for use as structural fill. Imported fill materials should meet the requirements for Gravel Borrow, as described in Section 9-03.14 of the 1998 WSDOT Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge, and Municipal Construction (WSDOT Standard Specifications). Soils with fines contents higher than 7 percent may be acceptable if the earthwork is performed during dry weather and the contractor's methods are conducive to proper compaction of the soil. The use of materials with a fines content in excess of 7 percent should be evaluated by the engineer on a case by case basis. If 3 Hazen HS rl.doc 5 PACRIM GEOTECHNICAL INC. 1 PacRim Project No. C )0 1 May 12, 1999 imported fill is to be placed during periods of wet weather, we recommend the gravel borrow specification be modified so the fines content does not exceed 5 percent. Structural fill soils should be moisture conditioned to within about 2 percent of optimum moisture content, placed in loose, horizontal lifts less than 8 inches in thiclness, and compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density (MDD), as determined using test method ASTM D1557 (Modified Proctor). Compaction of backfill material placed adjacent to below- grade walls should be accomplished using relatively light equipment so that excessive lateral pressure is not transmitted to the wall. A relative compaction requirement of 90 percent MDD is considered adequate for backfill placed within a horizontal distance of 5 feet from walls. The procedure to achieve the specified minimum relative compaction depends on the size and type of compacting equipment, the number of passes, thickness of the layer being compacted, 711 and certain soil properties. When size of the excavation restricts the use of heavy equipment, smaller equipment can be used, but the soil must be placed in thin enough lifts to achieve the required compaction. A sufficient number of in-place density tests should be performed as the fill is placed to verify the required relative compaction is being achieved. Generally, loosely compacted soils are a result of poor construction technique or improper moisture content. Soils with a high percentage of silt are particularly susceptible to becoming too wet, and coarse-grained materials easily become too dry, for proper compaction. Silty soils with a moisture content too high for adequate compaction should be dried as necessary, or moisture conditioned by mixing with drier materials, or other methods. Soils with significant clay content should not be used in structural fills. Wet Weather Earthwork The on-site soils are moisture sensitive and may be difficult to handle or traverse with construction equipment during periods of wet weather. Earthwork is typically most economical when performed under dry weather conditions. If earthwork is to be performed, or fill is to be placed in wet weather or under,wet subgrade conditions when soil moisture content is difficult to control, the following recommendations should be incorporated into the contract specifications. : .j > Earthwork should be performed in small areas to minimize exposure to wet weather. Excavation or the remaual of unsuitable soils should be followed promptly by the placement and compaction of clean structural fill. The size and type of construction equipment used may have to be limited to prevent soil disturbance. Under some circumstances, it may be necessary to excavate soils with a backhoe to minimize subgrade disturbance caused by equipment traffic; The ground surface within the construction area should be graded to promote run-off of surface water and to prevent the ponding of water; Hazen HS rl.doc 6 PACRIM GEOTECHNICAL INC. PacRim Project No. 079-001 May 12. 1999 1 X > Material used as structural fill should consist of clean, granular soil containing less than 5 percent fines. The fines should be non-plastic; 1 j > The ground surface within the construction area should be sealed by a smooth drum vibratory roller, or equivalent, and under no circumstances should be left uncompacted and exposed to moisture. Soils which become too wet for compaction should be removed and replaced with clean granular materials; > Excavation and placement of fill should be observed by the geotechnical engineer to verify that all unsuitable materials are removed and suitable compaction"and site drainage is achieved; and > Local best management practices for erosion protection should be strictly followed. BUILDING FOUNDATIONS Foundation Support jBased on the results of our exploration program, we anticipate that native lodgement and ablation till deposits will be encountered at or near the foundation level of the proposed auditorium. These soils are generally medium dense to very dense and should provide adequate support of the structural loads using shallow, conventional foundations. Isolated spread footings or continuous strip footings may be used to support the proposed auditorium, provided they are founded on the native lodgement and ablation till deposits, or compacted structural fill placed directly upon the native lodgement and ablation till deposits. We recommend a maximum allowable bearing pressure of 3,000 pounds per square foot(psf) for designing the footings. The recommended maximum allowable bearing pressure may be increased by 1/3 for short term transient conditions such as wind and seismic loading. All exterior footings should be founded at least 18 inches below the lowest adjacent finished grade; interior footings may be founded a minimum of 12 inches below top of slab. We recommend minimum footing widths of 18 and 24 inches for continuous strip and isolated column footings, respectively. j If a higher bearing pressure is desired, the footings can be founded entirely on undisturbed lodgement till, and an allowable soil bearing pressure of 6,000 psf may be used. This will require the emoval of ablation till beneath the footings. Assuming construction is cocomplished as recommended herein, and for the foundation loads anticipated, we estimate total settlement of spread foundations of less than about %z inch and differential settlement between two adjacent load-bearing components supported on competent soil of less than about '/< inch. We anticipate that the majority of the estimated settlement will occur during construction, as loads are applied. Wind, earthquakes, and unbalanced earth loads will subject the proposed structure to lateral forces. Lateral forces on a structure will be resisted by a combination of sliding resistance of its Hazcn HS rl.doc 7 PACRIM GEOTECHNICAL INC. PacRim Project No. ( 001 May 12. 1999 • base or footing on the underlying soil and passive earth pressure against the buried portions of the structure. For use in design, a coefficient of friction of 0.4 may be assumed along the • interface between the base of the footing and subgrade soils. A passive earth pressure value of 200 pounds per cubic foot (pcf) may be assumed in.design, provided footings are cast directly against competent, natural onsite soils or structural fill. The recommended coefficient of friction and passive earth pressure values include a safety factor of about 1.5. • 77 Foundation Excavations Footing excavations should be trimmed neat and the bottom of the excavation should be carefully prepared. Loose or softened soil should be removed from the footing excavation prior to placing reinforcing steel bars. We recommend that footing excavations be observed by the geotechnical engineer prior to placing steel and concrete, to verify that the recommendations of this report have been followed, and that an appropriate bearing stratum has been exposed. If footing excavations are open during the winter season or periods of wet weather, it may be helpful to provide a lean concrete mat or a layer of gravel to help preserve the subgrade after they have been inspected and until the footings are cast. If lean concrete is used, a 2-sack mix is recommended. If gravel is used to protect the footing subgrade, it should meet the gradation requirements for Class A Gravel Backfill for Foundations, as described in Section 9-03.12(1)A of the 1998 WSDOT Standard Specifications. Seismic Considerations The project site lies within Seismic Zone 3, as defined in the 1997 Uniform Building Code. Seismic Zone 3 includes the western portion of Washington, and represents an area of relatively high seismic risk. For comparison, much of California and southern Alaska are defined as Seismic Zone 4, which is an area of highest seismic risk. Consequently, moderate levels of earthquake shaking should be anticipated during the design life of the proposed improvements and the proposed structure should be designed to resist earthquake loading in accordance with the methodology described in the 1997 Uniform Building Code. Based on the subsurface conditions observed during our exploration program at the site, UBC s,_= Soil Type Sc may be assumed for the site. The corresponding normalized response spectra for the assumed UBC Soil Type is considered adequate for the site. Soil liquefaction is a phenomenon wherein saturated soil deposits temporarily lose strength and behave as a liquid in response to earthquake shaking. Soil liquefaction is generally limited to loose, granular soils located below the water table. The relatively dense nature of granular soils where shallow groundwater is present on site suggests a very low potential for soil liquefaction. • Hazen HS rl.d« 8 PACRI\1 GEOTECHNICAL INC. PacRim Project No. 079-00', - May 12. 1999 n • • footing Drains `-' The onsite soils are considered to be relatively impermeable. Therefore, the outside edge of all `..j perimeter footings should be provided with a drainage system consisting of 4-inch diameter, perforated, rigid plastic pipe embedded in a clean, free-draining sand and gravel meeting the 3 requirements of Section 9-03.12(4) of the 1998 WSDOT Standard Specifications for Gravel Backfill for Drains. The drain-pipe and surrounding drain rock should be wrapped in filter fabric (Mirafi 140N, or approved equivalent) to minimize the potential for clogging and/or ground loss due to piping. A typical footing drain detail is presented in-Figure 3. ,, n Water collected from the footing drains should be directed into the local storm drain system or -- other suitable outlet, and graded such that they do not collect or hold water. Roof downspouts and other drains should not be connected to the foundation drains. The footing drains should Iinclude clean-outs to allow periodic maintenance and inspection. Grades around the proposed structure should be sloped such that surface water drains away from the building. Roof drain discharge should not be placed immediately adjacent to footings. If roof drain spouts discharge water onto splash blocks, the splash blocks should be situated at least 3 feet away from the building line. Alternatively, roof drains could be tight-lined to the local storm drain system or other appropriate outlet. ICONCRETE SLABS-ON-GRADE Preparation of areas beneath concrete slab-on-grade floors should be performed as recommended Iin the Subgrade Preparation section. Prior to constructing concrete slabs-on-grade, surficial soils should be scarified to a minimum depth of 8 inches, moisture conditioned to within about 2 percent of optimum moisture content, and compacted to a firm and unyielding condition, to at Ileast 95 percent MDD, determined using ASTM D1557 (Modified Proctor). Scarification and compaction will not be required if floor slabs are placed directly on recently placed structural n fill. Li Interior slab-on-grade floors sliould be provided with an adequate moisture break. The capillary break material should consist of a minimum of 4 inches of free-draining, crushed rock or well- graded sand and gravel compacted to at least 95 percent MDD. The capillary break material should have a maximum particle size of 3/4-inch, with no more than 80 percent passing the No. 4 iti sieve and less than 5 percent fines (material passing the U.S. Standard No. 200 sieve). In areas where moisture will be detrimental to floor coverings or equipment inside the proposed structure, • a 10-mil polyethylene vapor barrier should be placed directly over the capillary break. Adequate precautions should be taken during construction to maintain the integrity of the barrier. A typical floor-slab sub-drain schematic is included on Figure 3. i 1 Hazen_HS_ri.doc 9 PACRIM GEOTECHNICAL INC. 1 PacRim Project No. 0 01 May 12. 1999 • PAVEMENT SUPPORT CONSIDERATIONS We understand that the bus turn around and parking lot south of the existing building will be primarily utilized by busses, light automobiles and pick-up trucks. Boring B-5 encountered about 4/2 feet of undocumented fill overlying stiff recessional outwash silt. The undocumented fill will be removed during initial stripping of the site, exposing recessional outwash silt as the subgrade. This silt has a high moisture content and will not provide sufficient pavement support for the anticipated loads. In order to accommodate the anticipated loads, we recommend placing a geotextile separator fabric over the approved subgrade and a minimum thickness of 2 feet of imported,granular structural fill compacted to at least 95 percent of MDD as determined by ASTM D1557. The geotextile fabric should consist of a non-woven,polypropylene fabric, Mirafi 160N or approved equivalent,placed with adjacent sheets overlapping at least 2 feet. Placement of the geotextile fabric and structural fill should be observed by the geotechnical engineer. Subgrade preparation in this manner should provide a firm and unyielding base to construct the pavement base and ACP section. Pavement materials and placement should conform to the 1998 WSDOT Standard Specifications. If soil conditions within the loop are found to vary from the conditions encountered in boring B-5, the geotextile fabric and/or portions of the fill may be omitted after verification by the geotechnical engineer. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES General recommendations relative to excavation and shoring, dewatering, pipe and vault bedding, and backfill are presented below. These recommendations generally apply to the utilities expected to be installed in conjunction with the proposed building modifications. We expect all utilities will be less than 6 feet in depth. Excavation and Shoring re Based on the soil conditions observed in our explorations, we anticipate that the on-site soils can be excavated with conventional excavating equipment; however, care must be taken during • construction to maintain stability of open excavations. The contractor should be aware that the on-site soils may contain boulders and may be difficult to excavate, particularly in the deeper portions of excavations. Maintenance of safe working conditions, including temporary excavation stability, is the responsibility of the contractor. All temporary cuts in excess of 4 feet in height should be sloped in accordance with Part N of Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 296-155, or shored. Most of the native glacial soils classify as Type A or B Soil and for planning purposes, we estimate temporary excavation side slopes will stand at inclinations ranging from 1H to 1V, to 3/4H to 1V (horizontal to vertical). These estimated cut slope inclinations are applicable to excavations above the water table only. If perched groundwater is encountered during Hazen HS rl.doc 1 0 PACRIM GEOTECHNICAL INC. s PacRim Project No. 079-00 .1 jvlav 12, 1999 7 construction, dewatering may be required to lower the groundwater table below the base of the excavation (see Excavation Dewatering). Vibrations created by traffic and construction equipment may cause some caving and raveling of the trench walls. In.such an event, lateral support_for the trench walls should be provided by the contractor to prevent loss of ground support and possible distress to previously installed utilities structures, and/or roadways. In areas where raveling of the trench walls occurs, or where sloped excavations are not feasible, such as near structures or other improvements, trench boxes will likely be required. General recommendations for design and implementation of temporary shoring systems are presented below. I > Trench boxes may be used to support excavations in the on site soils, provided the groundwater level is-below the base of the excavation and settlement sensitive structures and jutilities are not situated immediately adjacent to the excavation. > Where a trench box is used to support excavations in loose or disturbed soils, one or both sides of the trench is likely to cave against the box. The caving may extend out on either I side of the trench for a distance approximately equal to the depth of the trench. As a result, we recommend driving steel sheets between the trench side walls and the outside edges of Ithe trench box wherever the near edge of the trench would be closer than about 1.5 times the trench depth to settlement sensitive structures or utilities. The steel sheets should be I embedded several feet below the base of the excavation and bracing should be placed near the tops of the sheets to hold them apart I ➢ Precautions should be taken during removal of the temporary shoring system, to minimize disturbance of the pipe, underlying bedding materials, and native soils. • Excavation Dewatering Perched groundwater conditions may be encountered during construction, especially following an extended period of wet weather. If shallow groundwater is encountered during excavation, we expect that it can be controlled by using ditches, sumps, and pumps, provided excavations do not extend greater than a few feet below the groundwater level. Regardless of the dewatering system used, i-t should be installed and operated such that natural soils are prevented from being removed along with the groundwater. J If groundwater is encountered within sand deposits during construction, reasonable care should be taken to prevent groundwater from flowing in from the bottom of the excavation, thereby creating a "quick" condition. Under quick conditions, the density of the natural soils will be reduced, resulting in increased pipe settlement during and after construction. To reduce the risk I Hazen HS rl.doc 11 PACRIM GEOTECHNICAL INC. i •1 PacRim Project No. 1 001 jvlav 12. 1999 of creating a quick condition, we recommend the groundwater level be kept at least 2 feet below the bottom of the excavation in areas where sand is encountered. Pipe Support General recommendations relative to the bedding of pipe materials include: • Pipe bedding for rigid and flexible pipe should meet the gradation requirements of Sections 9-03.15 and 9-03.16 of the WSDOT Standard Specifications, respectively. • ➢ Prior to installation of the pipe, the pipe bedding should be shaped to fit the lower portion of the pipe exterior with reasonable closeness to provide continuous support along the pipe. > Backfill around the pipe should be placed in layers and tamped around the pipe to obtain complete contact. Pipe bedding material should be used as trench backfill to at least 12 `. inches over the top of the pipe, for the full width of the trench. In areas where a trench box is used, the bedding material should be placed before the trench box is advanced. > Where a trench box is used, we recommend that pipe restraint in the form of a cable and winch system be used inside the pipe so that the joints of previously laid pipe are not pulled apart as the trench box is advanced. Trench Backfill • In paved roadway or floor slab areas, we recommend that trench backfill consist of suitable onsite soils or select granular material meeting the specifications for Bank Run Gravel for Trench Backfill, as described in Section 9-03.19 of the WSDOT Standard Specifications. Our recommendations for re-use of onsite soil are presented in the Structural Fill Materials and • Compaction section of this report. We recommend that trench backfill placed more than 2 feet below pavement and floor slab subgrade elevations be compacted to at least 90 percent of the maximum dry density (MDD), as determined in accordance with ASTM D1557. The upper 2 feet of the backfill-should be compacted to at least 95 percent to provide an adequate subgrade for the overlying pavement section. In areas where several inches of backfill settlement can be tolerated, such as landscaped areas, backfill compaction could be reduced to 85 percent, except the upper 2 feet, which should be compacted to at least 9b percent. UNCERTAINTIES AND LIMITATIONS We have prepared this report for Renton School District No. 403, for use in design of this project. This report should be provided in its entirety to prospective contractors for bidding and estimating purposes; however, the conclusions and interpretations presented in this report should . Hazen Hs rl.doc 12 PACRIM GEOTECHNICAL INC. PacRim Project No. 079-00 Mav 12. 1999 not be construed as a warranty of the subsurface conditions. Experience has shown that soil and . groundwater conditions can vary significantly over small distances. Inconsistent conditions can occur between explorations that may not be detected by a geotechnical study. If,.during future site operations, subsurface conditions are encountered which vary appreciably from those described-herein, PacRim should be notified for review of the recommendations of this report, and revision of such if necessary. We recommend that PacRim be retained to review the plans and specifications and verify that our recommendations have been interpreted and implemented as intended. Sufficient geotechnical monitoring, testing and consultation should be provided during construction to confirm that the conditions encountered are consistent with those indicated by explorations. Recommendations for design changes will be provided should conditions revealed during construction differ from those anticipated, and to verify that the geotechnical aspects of construction comply with the contract plans and specifications. Within the limitations of scope, schedule and budget, PacRim attempted to execute these services in accordance with generally accepted professional principles and practices in the fields of geotechnical engineering and engineering geology at the time the report was prepared. No warranty, express or implied, is made. The scope of our work did not include environmental assessments or evaluations regarding the presence or absence of wetlands or hazardous or toxic substances in the soil, surface water, or groundwater at this site. O.O We appreciate the opportunity to be of service. G o61 �'r \. Sincerely, PACRIM GEOTECRNICAL LNC_ � oo58e 5)1z./ ci ISTER j �S`sJONAL E14G EXPIRES 12/11 / Ob H H. Haselton, P.E. Michael G. Byers, P.E. Project Engineer . Senior Engineer • Attachments: Figure 1. Vicinity Map Figure 2. Site and Exploration Plan Figure 3. Typical Perimeter Footing and Floor Slab Subdrains Figure 4. Typical Utility Trench Appendix A. Field Exploration Program Appendix B. Laboratory Testing I Hazen HS rl.doc 13 PACRIM GEOTECHNICAL INC. ''' PR067001 CDR _ . Puget ,�:'� , 1 `f ••�, 7,/...'• I Sound • • �• i Lai' Warlcin;ion --�ti--_ ri• -- .i.. ram- �/'/_ I .. -. - I '•I Seattle Bellevue •7.:1 NI* - �C� �,:, -,• !oozy (' 3 I . . • • West •o.� . Seattle Project .I; • .! `J 8 ,fir I �\ . .� i--- �(l J• ..'Boy� \ 1\\"s2. .� : t ,• . --. : SITE Park i . . I' ;- ..t • i L'•.•,.,"^`• ; • ' '"'"A •••,,,• •41:*.:17.1"-',.. . .,... .,,s''..SZ7A2.:/, '.:\:::* '.. •, •. ..•.. ./.:•.•:-..:77..,.4,:i...-..:....... - ...;:. ..,..... ...s, � at.ly; • s`r37r �•.:' � 1 �_ /` I •��` .�T�silsr• :�.I � �• ����. � u► i;- •, g . ... \.:,,a_Ls:::.:fr.::..:: : . 1. .......:..!,...-) ...-; ,-7....„------...4--, ,.., �' Imo- r i + rs 1 t I, t ti� FIbASd� .1. .�y �'T � ~4 �.��"' \ I, 1 l ��I ••ti „ ' i' '�, il• • 7:.:4"_L—..i� .— ' •;•_1_'' . . . `\ .. -'. ., �i ' rs sch • ' 1 I r/l "'' f ■■ �'Set' . ' �' .}Jam.i ; ;g} . , - . ' ..:. 12'.' .) ' >? i P • ! ` • .tG lril\P cosiri.ie~ I Par :l... I :( + II II .fJ J. \ i • t �N 1. �' at r 1, • .1 se.: • . .• ,. 28T71 I 1 ' sr!} , __ r •i . a `. 1'L ter 1' .. • �. , 1 .*? \ -- • . .. •,1-1 . .... . } SOURCE: Printed from TOPO! © 1997 Wildflower Productions (www.topo.com) - • El) SCALE IN MILES • 0 0.5 1.0 • Hazen High School Modifications Renton, Washington A Renton Scho©i District No. 403 } Ar'llik PACRIM GEOTECHNICAL INC. VICINITY MAP ::fr GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING AND APPLIED EARTH SCIENCES 141111111' Project No.: 079-001 FIGURE 1 PRo47002.CDR ing Boiler Room • &5, LEGEND • B-1 Approximate boring location and designation Source: Preliminary Site Sketch; DLR Group, 1999 Li �►' ations SITE AND • PACRIM GEOTECHNICAL INC. EXPLORATION PLAN GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING AND APPLIED EARTH SCIENCES 03 Project No.:079-001 FtGURE 2 ..1. PR047004.CDR is 1 Floor Slab --'• ,I> Vapor Barrier T 3 !.,4 Slope to Drain ...... .._ _ . _ A.,: _ - = __-. z 4 Inches 6 Inches - -.-.:1.-- _ - �` .,: Min. Min. - •:;' r- $ 0.0,o •0,o •o,o .0.0 .0.0 . 0. :0,0 •0.0 •of_';...1.4 .L tL,.+^'r.'S. o. N00 • oo • 00 • oo . 00 • oo • 0 • 0. o. sJ ,+t-rsyc o_o .0 ° .o o .o o .o o .o o -° 18Inches -•:4' 1 _ ° �` .o °o 0 00 0 00 0 °o 0 00° o • Min. � • <..^4-'..r_�:'�. \ 0o .0o .00 •00 .o0 •o .0 •o '= :��, gi:: �// o o_o • .0 o .0 • .0 o .0 O. o .o o .0 •_ -�— ;V 4 Inches Min. •°•0 ••0• n." •a1C ;f�7.4 414 \/ ° Diameter:° : ,o: . �� � / .0 • .0 .0 0 .0 .0 .0 • .0 .0 d1G ti� S .L }j •0 0 •0 0 •0 0 .0 t,c.�e .nc q--zl ;! ° ° .O /\/\/\/:/\/\/\/\/\, 2 Inches Alin. i ° ° o °° ° ' �i\�/>�/>�/ �, /,\./\�/ 4 Inches Max. °''` \..' 4 Inches c Min. 12 Inches Min. F LEGEND oSurface seal; native soil or other 0 Drain pipe; perforated or slotted PVC or no low-permeability material. other rigid pipe laid with perforations or slots facing down, tight jointed, with a ° i.`f ?D Gravel backfill for drains; positive gradient. WSDC Standard Specifications, Do not use flexible, corrugated plastic pipe. Section 9-03.12(4). . Tightline to positive, permanent discharge. i • si Capillary break; free-draining sand and Do not tie building downspout drains into gravel with less than 5% fines. footing lines. -- Filter fabric; Mirafi 140Nho;equivalent. • SCHEMATIC ONLY- NOT TO SCALE NOT A CONSTRUCTION DRAWING Hazen High School Modifications Renton, Washington al Renton School District No. 403 1 l' PACRIM GEOTECHNICAL INC. TYPICAL PERIMETER FOOTING AND db GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING AND APPLIED EARTH SCIENCES FLOOR SLAB S U B D RA 1 N S • Nam" Project No.:079-001 FIGURE 3 i PRD47003.CDR • Non-Roadway Roadway Areas Areas / V\`�'Y\\T•.n .. .s .r .. :°.•!I. :.! \ \ \ \ /' </<,\\ ' l\//.� \ \/ :'i \ ;j, ',ij, �� ''�:J'/\//' 'Varies .� C:0 95 ��G r\\z. CD .4...a.•.s,•..:...,. ,.•,:: ,:• 95 '• 2 Feet Vic. • A Backfill •'.••'•!a• :•�•;:,• .:••.: Varies • Pi pe P A Bedding Varies LEGEND N1 Asphalt cement pavement81 :J'_' Base material , :,: Backfill material (refer to text) • Bedding material; material type depends on type of pipe and laying . conditions. Bedding should conform to the manufacturers recommendations for the type of pipe selec'terd. SCHEMATIC ONLY—NOT TO SCALE 80 Minimum percentage of maximum NOT A CONSTRUCTION DRAWING laboratory dry density as determined by ASTM Test Method D 1557 (Modified Proctor). Hazen High School Modifications Renton, Washington Renton School District No. 403 Arlk PACRIM GEOTECHNICAL INC. TYPICAL UTILITY TRENCH • - GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING AND APPLIED EARTH SCIENCES 44111.10' Project No.:079-001 FIGURE 4 r. • 74 APPENDIX A of I FIELD EXPLORATION PROGRAM tai Subsurface conditions for the project were explored using a truck-mounted, Central Mining Equipment model CME-85 drill rig utilizing a 4 1/4-inch I.D. hollow stem auger. The drill rig was owned and operated by Gregory Drilling of Redmond, Washington and was under subcontract to PacRim Geotechnical Inc. for this project. 7. Five borings (B-1 through B-5) were drilled at selected locations on April 15 and 16, 1999 to depths ranging from about 111/2 to 161/2 feet below ground surface. The approximate locations of the borings are shown on Figure 2 in the main body of the report. Results of the exploration program are shown on the summary boring logs included in this appendix as Figures A-2 through A-6. Figure A-1 is a key to symbols and descriptions used on the exploration logs. 1 The explorations were located in the field by pacing relative to existing features shown on site plans supplied by DLR Group. The approximate ground surface elevations at the exploration locations were also determined based on the topographic maps supplied. The locations and elevations of the explorations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the methods used. ISoil samples were obtained from all of the borings at 2 1/2- to 5-foot intervals. Samples were obtained using a heavy-walled, 3 1/4-inch outside diameter split barrel sampler with interior rings. The sampler was driven into the soil a distance of 18 inches using a CME automatic trip, 300- pound hammer freely falling a distance of 30 inches. Recorded blows for each 6 inches of sampler penetration are shown on the boring logs. The blow counts provide a qualitative Imeasure of the relative density of cohesionless soil, or the relative consistency of fine-grained soils. Representative portions of the samples were placed in moisture tight plastic bags and/or 1 tubes and transported to our laboratory for further observation and testing. PacRim personnel were present throughout the field exploration program to observe the borings, iii assist in sampling, and to prepare descriptive logs of the explorations. Soils were classified in general accordance with ASTM D2488, Standard Practice for Description and Identification of Soils (Visual-Manual Procedure). The exploration logs in this appendix represent our 1 interpretation of subsurface-conditions observed in the field, and the results of laboratory testing. A TI Hazen Hs rI.doc Al- PACRIM GEOTECHNICAL INC. RELATIVE DENSITY OR CI ;ISTENCY VERSUS SPT N-VALUI LABORATORY TEST SYMBOLS COHESIONLESS SOILS COHESIVE SOILS 7 - Approximate AL AtterbergLimits Density N(blows/ft) Relative Density(%)Approximate Consistency N(blows/ft) Undrained Shear FC Fines Content _ Strength(psf) Very Loose 0 to 4 0 - 15 Very Soft 0 to 2 <250 GSD Grain Size Distribution Loose 4 to 10 15 - 35 Soft 2 to 4 250 - 500 MC Moisture Content Medium Dense 10 to 30 35 - 65 Medium Stiff 4 to 8 500 - 1000 MD Moisture Content/Dry Density Dense 30 to 50 65 - 85 Stiff 8 to 15 1000 - 2000 Comp Compaction Test(Proctor) Very Dense over 50 85 - 100 Very Stiff 15 to 30 2000 - 4000 SG Specific Gravity Hard over 30 >4000 CBR California Bearing Ratio RM Resilient Modulus Perm Permeability TXP Triaxial Permeability UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM Cons Consolidation VS Vane Shear MAJOR DIVISIONS GROUP DESCRIPTIONS DS Direct Shear UC Unconfined Compression Gravel and i► GW Well-graded GRAVEL TXS Triaxial Compression Clean Gravel A, UU Unconsolidated,Undrained Gravelly Soils —, (little or no fines) GP Poorly-graded GRAVEL CU Consolidated,Undrained ornorp Coarse More than '.:f ' CD Consolidated,Drained ... Grained 50%of Coarse Gravel with ',` GM Silty GRAVEL Soils Fraction Retained Fines(appreciable on No.4 Sieve amount of fines) GC Clayey GRAVEL SAMPLE TYPE . More than SYMBOLS 50%Retained Sand and Clean Sand SW Well-graded SAND • on No. Sandy Soils (little or no fines) a Std. Penetration Test(2.0"OD) 200 Sieve SP Poorly-graded SAND Size 50%or More Ring Sampler(3.25"OD) of Coarse Sand with ..�.:i.: SM Silty SAND Fraction Passing Fines(appreciable r//�j 8 California Sampler(3.0"OD) NO°4 Sieve amount of fines) !/ SC Clayey SAND i ML SILT , Shelby Tube Silt Fine and Liquid Limit % G Grab Sample Grained Less than 50% /CL Lean CLAY Clay _ Core Run Soils —OL Organic SILTor CLAY Non-standard Penetration Test 50%or More I I MH Elastic SILT (with split spoon sampler) Passing Silt IVI Liquid Limit No.200 Sieve and 50%or More C H Fat CLAY Size Clay OH Organic SILTor CLAY Highly Organic Soils L` PT PEAT GROUNDWATER WELL COMPLETIONS IIIMMIMMIll Concrete Seal j Note: Well Casing IwofiG Sample descriptions in this report are based on visual field Bentonite Seal and laboratory observations,which intlude density/consistency, moisture condition,grain size,and plasticity estimates, and Groundwater LevelT. MM...il .. should not be construed to imply field nor laboratory testing unless and Date ATD =At presented herein. Visual-manual classification methods Time of Drilling) of ASTM D 2488 were used as an identification guide. Where Slotted Well Casing laboratory data are available, soil classifications are in general AM, • accordance with ASTM D 2487.* Sand Backfill ..••.:�. r i d Soil Cuttings/Slough ri Hazen High School Modifications it Renton, Washington Renton School District No. 403 1 P ‘ PACRIM GEOTECHNICAL INC. KEY TO EXPLORATION LOGS w 41111181.• GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING AND APPUED EARTH SCIENCES Project No.: 079-001 FIGURE A-1 o BORING B-1 • — z c Remarks a) m �' -, a, 0 0 0 m and EP5-5g 3 E ny v coE > I Other Tests co o` a� m co o °; co Surface Elevation =468 feet w °' _., 4 ,Sod and topsoil. 1 6 1 I I , Medium dense, mottled light brown and gray,fine to 7 6_. - - ML I ; I medium sandy SILT, trace to little organics; moist. - - I (Fill) Becomes molted light b ue gray aria-Er-own, silty own, si 5 ;• - 1 ': SAND,trace organics, trace gravel. 2 127.0 10.4 6 X SM r 465- 8 /\ ..l:- Highly mottled organic layer at 3.5'. l:;t: Very dense, light brown, silty SAND, trace gravel, 6 ,7 - 5 - j occasional silt partings: moist. (Lodgement Till) 3 122.0 14.6 16 l . .- '. . 37 7� - - L . - I: ;: -460- 4 42 X SM i 50 L - - . _ _ i. Drills gravelly at 13 ft. -455- I,, - 15 - 1.17 \/ 1 Becomes light gray, occasional silt interbeds. 5 40 X - I - 50 /\ : :1.: U - - - -450- Boring terminated at depth of 16.5 feet. Ground water not encountered. - 20 - - - ti - - -445- �- 25 - - - - -440- Date Drilled: 4/16/99 Hazen High School Modifications Elevation Datum: Supplied Plans Drilling Method: 4.25" I.D. Hollow Stem Auger Renton, Washington Sampling Method: 300 lb. CME Automatic Hammer Renton School District No. 403 'k PACRnv1 GEOTECHNICAL INC. LOG OF BORING B-I SHEET 1 OF 1 . � GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING AND APWJED EARTH SCIENCES Project No. 079-001 FIGURE A-2 z N BORING B-2 - Remarks . c — 1.2 0 . ^ a� � ^ o Other Tests cn E o aM c_) in cn c v' D cn Surface Elevation = 468 feet w °' 1 4 sm \Sod and topsoil. r 1 15.2 4 XMedium dense, brown, slimy SAND, trace Erne gravel. , 5 and organic matter: moist. Fill)) - edium dense, brown, silty XNU, trace fine, - - 6 SM ; :.: rounded gravel; moist. (Ablation Till) —465— 2 117.9 12.2 6 - .. ....: Becomes mottled gray and brown, trace rounded 6 X . ...j.;,..: gravel, occasional blue-gray zones. - . 4 - 5 — •i:; Dense, gray brown, silty SAND, trace rounded _ 3 124.5 11.3 11 Z - - gravel; moist. (Lodgement Till) 16 . - : �B- jj . � . 7 — 10 — Becomes very dense, dark gray. - - - . 4 17 X _ - SM I. .: 20 (� .: .... . ' . is t - - '-455— — 15 — andoccasional 1/8 - - 9 Becomes mottled brown gray, 5 17 • inch fine to medium sand interbeds at high angles, - - 23 \high angle rust stains. �- - . —450— Boring terminated at depth of 16.5 feet. . Groundwater encountered at depth of 9 feet. . . — 20 — - - I - —445— - 25 — - i _ —440- - 30 — - . 7.] . . . . , . —435— _ — 35 — - 1. r - - - - —430— i f • Date Drilled: 4/15/9 Hazen High School Modifications Elevation Datum: Supplied Plans Drilling Method: 4.25" I.D. Hollow Stem Auger Renton, Washington Sampling Method: 300 lb. CME Automatic Hammer Renton School District No. 403 LOG OF BORING B-2 PACRIM GEOTECHNICAL INC. SHEET 1 OF 1 Nor GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING AND APPLIED EARTH SCIENCES Project No. 079-001 FIGURE A-3 6 .N BODING B-3 . - Remarks au _ c a) 0 o g ro and a0 =-- o a r " ccn� a� 73 725= o OtherT2sts CV/3 o gg CS m jn o n c.5 cn Surface Elevation = 464 feet w 1 Sod and topsoil. z-- 1 4 r, j,: "Medium dense, mottled light brown and gray, silty 4 ,\ - SM 1 :: SAND, numerous roots, occasional organics; moist. - - j• I: (Fill) Very dense, light brown, silty SAND with gravel, -6 — scattered silt interbeds; moist. (Lodgement Till) . GSD 2 15.0 17 X 31 /_\ - I•:'.jj•• -460- SM :I. ;.,1 10 i - 5 - 1 : Becomes numerous horizontal rust stains; moist to 3 16 wet. I . , 31 . v ! I' Dense, rusty brown,fine to medium SAND with silt, trace mica; occasional horizontal rust stains; wet. (Glacially Overridden Sediments) - _ -455- ATD i 7 - - 10 — _a 4 10 Z •I'SP 12 SM I - - _ 'I -450- - 15 - Hard, light brown, if ne sandy SILT, trace medium 6 \ ML sand, occasional rusty layers; moist. 5 - • 11 _ 18 Boring terminated at depth of 16.5 feet. Groundwater encountered at 10 feet. • - - . -445- - 20 - . -440- - 25 - - i y • - - -435- Date Drilled: 4/16/99 Hazen High School Modifications Elevation Datum: Supplied Plans Drilling Method: 4.25" I.D. Hollow Stem Auger Renton, Washington Sampling Method: 300 lb. CME Automatic Hammer Renton School District No. 403 LOG OF BORING B-3 "Ok PACRIM GEOTECHNICAL INC. 4 SHEET 1 OF 1 `r GEOTECHNICAL ENG VEERING AND APPLIED EARTH SCIENCES Project No. 079-001 FIGURE A-4 1 c z .N BORING B-4 Remarks c j a- o o and n0c.N °' 3 _ a > = o I cu Other Tests c� o am m co o a' D c� cn Surface Elevation = 468 feet w z'. 0 .� Sod and topsoil. .- J 1 1 1 -Very loose, brown, organic silty SAND, trace tine 2 /\ - SM i :; : gravel; moist. (Fill) 11 •. Loose, mottled brown and gray, silty SAND, trace 3 — - +•. fine gravel; moist. (Ablation Till) 2 109.7 20.1 2 ' -465- 5 x SM { ' ' - - ::j: - 5 ' , 7 �i . Very dense, mottled brown and gray, siltySAND, 3 122.9 13.1 13 trace fine gravel; moist. (Lodgement•Till) 27 A is v - 1: • -460- - 10 -ill _ 4 17 30 37 X SM : - - 1 : 1 ` . .k: -455- - .l. '.p j 1a �/' - 15 j.r Becomes dense, light gray, occasional pockets of 5 16 A I r sand with silt(SP-SM) and silt (ML). 17 , f I a Boring terminated at depth of 16.5 feet. -450 IGroundwater not encountered. II - 20 - - - - - . IT.L1 I - -445= - 25 - - P Y - - -440y d Date Drilled: 4/15/99 Hazen High School Modifications Elevation Datum: Supplied Plans Drilling Method: 4.25" I.D. Hollow Stem Auger Renton, Washingten Sampling Method: 300 lb. CME Automatic Hammer Renton School District No. 403 LOG OF BORING B-4 `'� � PACRnVI GEOTECHNICAL INC. . • SHEET 1 OF 1 `� GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING AND APPLIED EARTH SCIENCES Project No. 079-001 FIGURE A-5 BORING B-5 z ., _ fi Remarks a� c a) ) c� o g n� E _ Es E_ Q I Other Tests f9 .e f9 a °' m ' a' cn o �� c� m cn o � = c0 co Surface Elevation = 460 feet w 1 ; ' �, Sod and topsoil. , i 1 1 - — Very soft, light brown to dark brown, organic SILL 1 /'\ - - OL —_ •with fine to medium sand, numerous roots; moist. — - Fill) - - ;tiff,molt ee-- light brown andrust SILT-frace Ine — - - i —, sand partings,trace mica; moist to wet. GSD 2 93.2 30.0 3 - ML 5 �� i . . - Stiff, light brown SILT, with fine sand, occasional 2 i - 5 - I high angle, rust colored fractures, trace mica; wet. -455- 3 94.3 29.5 4 I (Recessional Outwash) 7 /\ - ML - - ;-� 1 - . 1 Very dense, light brown, silty SAND with gravel, . .•. ::.: subrounded gravel and sand; moist. (Lodgement Till) - 6 — - 10 - SM -450- • 4 18 1.. . ' 4 25 X . I:.r.• - - Boring terminated at depth of 11.5 feet. - , Groundwater not encountered. - 15 - -445- - 20 - -440- - 25 - -435- i v • Date Drilled: 4/16/99 Hazen High School Modifications Elevation Datum: Supplied Plans Drilling Method: 4.25" I.D. Hollow Stem Auger Renton, Washington Sampling Method: 300 lb. CME Automatic Hammer i Renton School District No. 403 LOG OF BORING B-5 PACRIM GEOTECI- ICAL INC. ' SHEET 1 OF 1 �� GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING AND APPLIED EARTH SCIENCES Project No. 079-001 FIGURE A-6 1 APPENDIX B j LABORATORY TESTING 'A • PacRim personnel performed laboratory soil tests in general accordance with the latest revision of 1.i appropriate ASTM test methods. We tested selected soil samples to determine moisture content and dry density, and grain size distribution. The test procedures and test results are discussed below. i MOISTURE CONTENT AND DRY DENSITY Laboratory tests were conducted to determine the moisture content and dry density of selected soil samples, in general accordance with ASTM D2216 and D2937 respectively. Test results are indicated at the sampled intervals on the appropriate boring logs in Appendix A. I GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION Grain size distribution was determined for selected samples in general accordance with ASTM D422. JResults of grain size analyses are plotted on Figure B-1. 1 I rJ i 1,i, F a l i.L4 Huen HS rl.doc B-1 PACRIM GEOTECHNICAL INC. i ^ '_*4? 1111114 ~° �' __� �^�00 � [- OW ONF mig ' � ` GRAVEL SAND ' Coarse- C -T �� —_ [-------- ���T CLAY' | «o/o� | «m | Fine � U3. STANDARD SIEVE SIZES 3^ 1'1/2" 15X� 3�^ #x #10 #20 #40 #80 #100 #200 100 ' | � nb ' ' ou ----- 1- _ | f | | � -� �__ 0O 00 ---- -- |------- ---�_-_ `--��~- _ - - '-- --' �- ' | �- | | --- i- - -- --' -' -' -- --'--- - � 70 �� ' - - --" [ |-- -- - -'--- --- - | - - - - ------- - - - - '- uu � � (N oo / � |- - --- -- -- ---- ------ - ------'---- ' c� 5O | | > "^ -�- -- `-|-- -- - j--- -- -|' �� . --| ------ -- ----------- - -- u' | \ | | | 40 30 a- 2O --- |-- [T--- - -- [---------- }-- -- -- -[ --l--- l-- ------- '--'- ' - �-'- - - ---- - ' 10 ----'|-- ----�--- - --- | -- - -- -�---| 1 -- ---- - - 0 | | | | | | | | � 50 10 5 1 0.5 01 0.05 0]]1 0.005 0.001 0.000s GRAIN SIZE |NMILLIMETERS SYMBOL SAMPLE DEPTH (R) CLASSIFICATION % MC LL PL P| % Gn»e| % Sand % Fh'uy 0 8'3 S'2 2.5'4.0 Light brown, oUiy SAND will gravel. 15.0 12.7 48.0 30.3 oo H'5 S-2 2.5'4]3 Gray brown SILT with fine k»medium sand. 30.0 0.4 7.0 02.6 - . r , � . �� T Hazen High School Modifications GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS I8cC�88 `�EOTE[�Nl[AL /���' Renton, Washington TEST RESULTS ~446W oso`snxwmAL ENGINEERING AND APPLIED EARTH SCIENCES Renton School District No. 4O3 Project No.: 079'001 Figure: B'1 ��� INVOICE REQ. 3T CITY OF RENTON t INANCE DEPARTMENT Date: From Department: Authorization (Name & Signature): clI3a ray fk V ELOVA-C-krr CtR Customer No.: Account Name: Dept. Contact: Check One Invoice Number: Original Invoice ❑ Credit Memo ❑ Debit Memo ❑ Invoice ► 1Title & Reference No.: v L I) 9 37 S t-tc P LA,J 1PcV «tkyEN J to60 M. i.rra(.. RED( vJ to A epr4 ��- C414 ZE 0 . q c6 Ef ccrtco L— Description: t-� 1;z . S . 0\1 ( NJ Account Distribution and Amounts >; Account Number Work Order/ Dollar Amount Function bO O . 31-5.. S< <c70.000 '5 310 BOO. ° oc ojt] Szo 6000-0 O o C3 - 3 I S r d oo 022- 'ZSO. 00 o O co - o , Sf q 7, cT 2- INVOICE TOTAL: V -7 S �].. 7 2-- Comments: Billing Address: RLNToN SCNOOL 01 1NR lci q03 vAckLrC«S .SZ ovEKA1-(oNS I tI S t t2E ��O� , A g805S DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS LAND USE PERMIT SUBMITTAL WAIVED MODIFIED COMMENTS: REQUIREMENTS: BY: BY: Calculations, Survey, Drainage Control Plan 2 Drainage Report 2 Elevations, Architectural 3 AND 4 Elevations, Grading 2 Existing Covenants (Recorded Copy)a Existing Easements (Recorded Copy) 4 Flood Plain Map, if applicable 4 Floor Plans 3 ANo 4 C Geotechnical Report2AND3 Grading Plan, Conceptual 2 Grading Plan, Detailed 2 King County Assessor's Map Indicating Site 4 Landscaping Plan, Conceptual4 Legal Description 4 List of Surrounding Property Owners 4 Mailing Labels for Property Owners 4 Map of Existing Site Conditions Master Application Form 4 Monument Cards (one per monument) , Parking, Lot Coverage & Landscaping Analysis 4 Plan Reductions (PMTs) 4 Postage 4 Public Works Approval Letter 2 Title Report or Plat Certificate 4 Topography Map (5' contours)3 o Traffic Study 2 Gli. Tree CuttingNegetation Clearing Plan 4 Utilities Plan, Generalized 2 Wetlands Delineation Map4 Wetlands Planting Plan 4 tNbN I" // Wetlands Study 4 //OW This requirement may be waived by: _ 1. Property Services Section PROJECT NAME: f'I. - ADD / `N 2. Public Works Plan Review Section 3. Building Section DATE: 0 4. Development Planning Section h:klivision.s\develop.ser\dev.plan.ing\waiver.xls **************************************************************** City of Renton WA Reprinted: 09/30/99 16 :48 Receipt **************************************************************** Receipt Number: R9904893 Amount: 1, 757.92 09/30/99 16 :48 Payment Method: BILL Notation: RSD 94335 Init: CRP Project # : LUA99-137 Type: LUA Land Use Actions Total Fees : 1, 757 .92 This Payment 1, 757. 92 Total ALL Pmts : 1, 757. 92 Balance: . 00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 000 . 345 . 81 . 00 . 0007 Environmental Review 500 . 00 000 .345 . 81 . 00 . 0017 Site Plan Approval 1, 000 . 00 000 . 345 . 81 . 00 . 0019 Variance Fees 250 . 00 000 . 05 .519 . 90 .42 . 1 Postage 7.92 If I , I PROPOSED DRAINAGE I A\ I CHARACTERISTICS n 1 1 V\ —f ~-t_--"r.-------fi==-- �.«- _-_ __ - - .i��====/_a===O \ ll\II l` Loi _ — — — — — — -9) \-:: 011 i Jld�//I - // ° ° °_®_ o- -- \ \• \ nI•� t I 1r----- I / I I 1 I \ \ - 1 1 \ r\ '-'�"1 III cI io__o� \`� II 1 II II \\ •\�� e ❑ ❑ ❑ W�'0),i +\\I / \\I !II to .P ... I I/ /. I I { I 1 \ \ ®� .a �� I I l l / \ 'fill" I `� � \ I /a1 1 / 110 \ / / \,_, \� i' • \ I ill}I' I11 � I I I \ \ \ - \ blll/I// ' /111 _ -+ I I 1 \ \ l j[/�//////////7 //////7///7/7777//7/////7/////7/////// 1 Illi0,4 ///11 \ X / 1/'` I ` \\ 1 1 \ --� 1 Ills' . __ ��1 / /1 ir � 1 1 JJJ�1' v ( , 1 II '1 % / 11 ';1 \ , y _ (1,\, , I Iyy„ / I III .1 -; / \ I \\! 4 d , ....- ...._,, 1 ` u+_ \/ / // / /, , 7 / I 11111 7-_. ,, q, 1 / 1 444 ft 0.,, / F ‘1 IIII / 1 / /� '.w-J\ / / I III I,r \\,\ \ `�- ir �-- ` ,. /I I I 1 ,s\ / ^\ ✓//////////// 1,////////////////////// I bi I I IjI 447•i\\ 1 NNt \ /' Id \`• / \ 1 y�I / //// �I IIIIIIII � \ 1 \ i' III \\? 1 \ i II II I 1 - / \ / _ L J 1 .01.: '1 \ 1\ 1 \\ I II' �,��� jI \l\\ \ ,�—��- _1 _,,, ,'n1 IiH'' \ //%- / / tt I:el • 11 1 / / `---'/ /' /Y k `:i11' I \ 11 \� 11 - �/ I I 'I,I 011! I I I \� �•te a.44 4.64LPL444.44 4/..1AL4444441.444i 14/ II !/I ..,/N {-{ J�� (� \ 11 I I il III' I :1° I I --� \\\ ,''`1, N '/�eI I ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ S ❑ ❑ YV1�/ %/////// /////////J/////////////f/J�////////// 1 I 11111 ii 1 \ "/' ,4 .-- ly, I , I I L� C �J y y ILA 110, j �i///J///J/////�- - I I I�I I 11 . 10` /- ' ,/ 1 I `.T 1 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ /, i 1 1 I // / i I pi'IIrl yo / I I�= cr.1 \ S ' . -'/ / J j I /,7777777777777777/7//////////i //////J////x'z/ 1 I p 11 I I \ 1 I�q1! / / ,- 1 I III \\ 1 0l ',- '/ '11 �I i IJ//� % % / \\ I/ 1\ I fill; I I ' /1 II I /^ 1 �1 % 1 • / ' • hill al C4I I 1iI1 \ ' r 1I HAZENHIGHSCHOOL % I / / IiIII_ _�` c / I / o1II, / / / F/N/SNEO -472. / I I II Ily\\ E���i��.s� i0 \ 4. \\ 11� .1i ,/ —�` : 1/"-7 / ELEVATION-4720' J/0I 'N --- IIII IP I /li :1 'I 11 \ ��� 1 1 I` //� 77 I; \/�f-'1 / , �_� II IS/7 n 1 I I ��- r sl I' 1 O 7% j ///////// - oii l j l i I i /' / I 7:1 { / /!/////////////////////////// / �/' I ' f�l11 I I41. / �t ), ' ter, `�� A:� b'i' . ''� ' ,A I . ' L'c`///Jl/ i / --�'i 1 I 1 I. -ii 1.- r I 1--- r_J ,; I • o I .''-- I I\ i 1 �+ / //////L / / /b7--e 1 IIIII / ,, can-mirra • I ,OMEN I / - v / ' �y I /J///fU/////J///J1/!/////////// ' , Y//// J/////////!/ ///�/////// /UU!//////�' '' / / XL--- 1' "- '�, I I � . c ..�u��� 1,, I �i' t �//////!///// -� v I ' Lv y '1 ' ' / 11J, ,,i,r r......_, ''''0 • I : /' ...WailrA op.... . \ /1 i' 1 1 V ��' l' ' i • _...,:;,,,s •-u.5„____-_ _,, __-- ,1 , , ' 1'I • /''I¢+I o '_ LI_. I _ I __�• I , I --' I • \ ''`'` `\\— ' / ' /� 7' \'\ \/ 11 I =I .4 7 .s....�i.e�ae�srrmrrr�rrt- r i Qz� ��' __\ _ 1"-.'T1——__ __—__—_ ./J'�1 --�1� -_ - 7 /-_ '\\ --_-/- ,.- � 9 ,--- --m- - '' - - '-- - �_— ' - 11 � �. -=--- — I -- --- - --- _�---_---- __—/_— --3- - - -- --- -- - - j+--- � _ \ 1 \ 1 1 ei9- ( ) CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 1800 COLUMBIA CENTER,701 5TH AVE,SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98104 Order No.: 000537486 PROPERTY ADDRESS: WASHINGTON' Your No.: HAZEN HIGH SCHOOL 'w arf, st ht yj i l9 �' RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT NO.403 1220 NORTH 4TH STREET I J U N 1 ' 1999 I RENTON,WASHINGTON 98055 ATTN: KATHY 1/1 Enclosed are your materials on the above transaction. If you have any questions regarding these materials, please contact us. Thank you for this opportunity to serve you. UNIT 10 -YOUR COMPLETE BUILDER/DEVELOPER SERVICE CENTER WE HAVE EXPANDED TO SERVE ALL YOUR TITLE INSURANCE NEEDS RELATED TO LAND ACQUISITION,DEVELOPMENT FINANCING AND PROPERTY SUBDIVISION. MIKE HARRIS TITLE OFFICER (206)628-5623 (E-MAIL:HARRISMI@CTLCOM) KEITH EISENBREY TITLE OFFICER (206)628-8377 (E-MAIL:EISENBREYK@CIT.COM) STEVE KINSELLA CONDO COORDINATOR (206)628-5614 (E-MAIL:KINSELLAS@CTT.COM) CHRIS JOHANSON SENIOR TITLE EXAMINER BOB BLOEDEL SENIOR TITLE EXAMINER FAX NUMBER (206)628-5657 ..=VELOPMENT PLANNII, CITY OF RENTON SEP 3 0 1999 RECEIVED CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY TITLEI7/RDA/0299 OCHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 1800 COLUMBIA CENTER,701 5TH AVE,SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98104 PHONE: 628-8377 FAX: (206)628-5657 ORDER NO: 537486 YOUR NO: HAZEN HIGH SCHOOL UNIT NO: 10 LOAN NO: SUPPLEMENTAL COMMITMENT 8 ORDER REFERENCE INFORMATION SUPPLEMENTAL NUMBER 1 SELLER: PURCHASER/BORROWER: RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT LOAN NUMBER: PROPERTY ADDRESS: WASHINGTON Our Title Commitment dated 04/28/99 at 8:00 A.M. is supplemented as follows : r THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION SET FORTH IN PARAGRAPH FOUR OF SCHEDULE A OF OUR COMMITMENT HAS BEEN AMENDED AS FOLLOWS: SEE EXHIBIT ATTACHED. z EXCEPT AS TO THE MATTERS SET FORTH HEREINABOVE, THE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY COVERED BY THIS ORDER HAS NOT BEEN REEXAMINED. AA JUNE 10, 1999 AUTHORIZED BY: KEITH EISENBREY CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY SUPPLCOM/RDA/0399 • * , a CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Order No.: 537486 LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL A: THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE SOUTH 30 FEET THEREOF CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR ROAD BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 4797337; ALSO EXCEPT THE NORTH 30 FEET THEREOF. PARCEL B: THE NORTH HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE NORTH 30 FEET FOR ROAD; AND THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE NORTH 30 FEET THEREOF FOR ROAD; ALSO EXCEPT THE SOUTH 30 FEET THEREOF CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR ROAD PURPOSES BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 4836103. PARCEL C: THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE NORTH 15 FEET; ALSO EXCEPT THE SOUTH 132 FEET OF THE EAST 330 FEET THEREOF; ALSO EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING WITHIN THE EAST 30 FEET OF SAID SUBDIVISION CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR ROAD BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 3262476. CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 1eaa11/r1m/121896 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMP_ Policy No.: 537486 EXTENDED MORTGAGEE LEASEHOLD POLICY SCHEDULE A (Continued) LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL D: THE NORTH HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE NORTH 275 FEET THEREOF; ALSO EXCEPT THE WEST 42 FEET THEREOF CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 6387732. PARCEL E: THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE NORTH 30 FEET AND THE EAST 30 FEET FOR ROAD; ALSO EXCEPT THE EAST 200 FEET OF THE NORTH 170 FEET OF THE REMAINDER; TOGETHER WITH THE NORTH 15 FEET OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE EAST 30 FEET THEREOF CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR ROAD PURPOSES BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 3262476. PARCEL F: THE EAST 200 FEET OF THE NORTH 170 FEET OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED TRACT: THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE NORTH 30 FEET AND THE EAST 30 FEET THEREOF. PARCEL G: THE EAST 90 FEET OF THE WEST 180 FEET OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED TRACT: THE NORTH THREE-QUARTERS OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMP; Policy No.: 537486 EXTENDED MORTGAGEE LEASEHOLD POLICY SCHEDULE A (Continued) LEGAL DESCRIPTION MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE SOUTH 264 FEET THEREOF. PARCEL H: THE SOUTH 132 FEET OF THE NORTH THREE-QUARTERS OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE EAST 30 FEET THEREOF CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY BY PUBLIC ROAD BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 3261884 . PARCEL I: THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF THE EAST 30 FEET THEREOF CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR ROAD BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 3261884; ALSO EXCEPT THE SOUTH 30 FEET THEREOF CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR ROAD PURPOSES BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 4828068 . PARCEL J: THE WEST 150 FEET OF THE SOUTH 132 FEET OF THE EAST 330 FEET OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. PARCEL K: THE NORTH 30 FEET OF THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. PARCEL L: THE NORTH THREE-QUARTERS OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMP_ Policy No.: 537486 EXTENDED MORTGAGEE LEASEHOLD POLICY SCHEDULE A (Continued) LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXCEPT THE EAST 30 FEET CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR ROAD BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 3261884; ALSO EXCEPT THE SOUTH 264 FEET; ALSO EXCEPT THE EAST 90 FEET OF THE WEST 180 FEET OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THAT PORTION OF SAID NORTH THREE-QUARTERS LYING NORTHERLY OF SAID SOUTH 264 FEET. PARCEL M: THE EAST 180 FEET OF THE SOUTH 132 FEET OF THE EAST 330 FEET OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE EAST 30 FEET CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR ROAD PURPOSES BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 3262476. PARCEL N: THE SOUTH 530 FEET OF TRACT 6, JOSEPH P. MARSHALL TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 38 OF PLATS, PAGE 30, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY © CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 1800 COLUMBIA CENTER,701 5TH AVE,SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98104 Order No.: 000537486 PROPERTY ADDRESS: WASHINGTON Your No.: HAZEN HIGH SCHOOL RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT NO.403 1220 NORTH 4TH STREET RENTON,WASHINGTON 98055 , MAY - .l 1999 ATTN: KATHY 1/1 Enclosed are your materials on the above transaction. If you have any questions regarding these materials, please contact us. Thank you for this opportunity to serve you. UNIT 10 -YOUR COMPLh 1'h BUILDER/DEVELOPER SERVICE CENTER WE HAVE EXPANDED TO SERVE ALL YOUR TITLE INSURANCE NEEDS RELATED TO LAND ACQUISITION,DEVELOPMENT FINANCING AND PROPERTY SUBDMSION. MIKE HARRIS TITLE OFFICER (206)628-5623 (E-MAIL:HARRISMI@CTT.COM) KEITH EISENBREY TITLE OFFICER (206)628-8377 (E-MAIL:EISENBREYK@C F.COM) STEVE KINSELLA CONDO COORDINATOR (206)628-5614 (E-MAIL:KINSELLAS@CTT.COM) CHRIS JOHANSON SENIOR TITLE EXAMINER BOB BLOEDEL SENIOR TITLE EXAMINER FAX NUMBER (206)628-9738 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Tn1.Ei7/RDA/0299 A HICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMP 1800 COLUMBIA CENTER, 701 5TH AVE SECOND COMMITMENT SEATTLE, WA 98104 Order No.: 537486 SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE Certificate for Filing Proposed Short Plat In the matter of the short plat submitted for your approval,this Company has examined the records of the County Auditor and County Clerk of KING County,Washington.and the records of the Clerk of the United States Courts holding terms in said County,and from such examination hereby certifies that the title to the following described land situate in said KING County,to-wit: SEE SCHEDULE A(NEXT PAGE) VESTED IN: RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 403 EXCEPTIONS: SEE SCHEDULE B ATTACHED CHARGE: $5 0 0.0 0 TAX: $ 43.00 Records examined to April 28, 1999 at 8:00 A.M. CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY By MIKE HARRIS/KEITH EISENBREY Title Officer (206)628-5623 SHPIATA/12-5-90/EK •` .,HICAGO riTLE INSURANCE COMP. Order No.: 537486 SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE A (Continued) LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL A: THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE SOUTH 30 FEET THEREOF CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR ROAD BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 4797337; ALSO EXCEPT THE NORTH 30 FEET THEREOF. PARCEL B: THE NORTH HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE NORTH 30 FEET FOR ROAD; AND THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE NORTH 30 FEET THEREOF FOR ROAD; ALSO EXCEPT THE SOUTH 30 FEET THEREOF CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR ROAD PURPOSES BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 4836103 . PARCEL C: THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE NORTH 15 FEET; ALSO EXCEPT THE SOUTH 132 FEET OF THE EAST 330 FEET THEREOF; ALSO EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING WITHIN THE EAST 30 FEET OF SAID SUBDIVISION CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR ROAD BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 3262476 . PARCEL D: SEE NEXT PAGE CHICAGO VILE INSURANCE COMPANY CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMP Policy No.: 537486 EXTENDED MORTGAGEE LEASEHOLD POLICY SCHEDULE A (Continued) LEGAL DESCRIPTION THE NORTH HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE NORTH 275 FEET THEREOF; ALSO EXCEPT THE WEST 42 FEET THEREOF CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 6387732 . PARCEL E: THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE NORTH 30 FEET AND THE EAST 30 FEET FOR ROAD; ALSO EXCEPT THE EAST 200 FEET OF THE NORTH 170 FEET OF THE REMAINDER; TOGETHER WITH THE NORTH 15 FEET OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE EAST 30 FEET THEREOF CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR ROAD PURPOSES BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 3262476 . PARCEL F: THE EAST 200 FEET OF THE NORTH 170 FEET OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED TRACT: THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE NORTH 30 FEET AND THE EAST 30 FEET THEREOF. • PARCEL G: • THE EAST 90 FEET OF THE WEST 180 FEET OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED TRACT: THE NORTH THREE-QUARTERS OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMP Policy No.: 537486 EXTENDED MORTGAGEE LEASEHOLD POLICY SCHEDULE A (Continued) LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXCEPT THE SOUTH 264 FEET THEREOF. PARCEL H: THE SOUTH 132 FEET OF THE NORTH THREE-QUARTERS OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE EAST 30 FEET THEREOF CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY BY PUBLIC ROAD BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 3261884 . PARCEL I : THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF THE EAST 30 FEET THEREOF CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR ROAD BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 3261884 . PARCEL J: THE WEST 150 FEET OF THE SOUTH 132 FEET OF THE EAST 330 FEET OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. PARCEL K: THE NORTH 30 FEET OF THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. PARCEL L: THE NORTH THREE-QUARTERS OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE EAST 30 FEET CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR ROAD BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 3261884; ALSO CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMP. Policy No.: 537486 EXTENDED MORTGAGEE LEASEHOLD POLICY SCHEDULE A (Continued) LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXCEPT THE SOUTH 264 FEET; ALSO EXCEPT THE EAST 90 FEET OF THE WEST 180 FEET OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THAT PORTION OF SAID NORTH THREE-QUARTERS LYING NORTHERLY OF SAID SOUTH 264 FEET. PARCEL M: THE EAST 180 FEET OF THE SOUTH 132 FEET OF THE EAST 330 FEET OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE EAST 30 FEET CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR ROAD PURPOSES BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 3262476 . PARCEL N: THE SOUTH 530 FEET OF TRACT 6, JOSEPH P. MARSHALL TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 38 OF PLATS, PAGE 30, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. • CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Order No.: 537486 SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B This certificate does not insure against loss or damage by reason of the following exceptions: GENERAL EXCEPTIONS: A. Defects,liens,encumbrances,adverse claims or other matters,if any,created,first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires for value of record the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. B. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. C. Encroachments,overlaps,boundary line disputes,and any other matters which would be disclosed by an accurate survey and inspection of the premises. D. Easements or claims of easements not shown by the public records. E. Any lien,or right to lien,for contributions to employee benefit funds,or for state workers'compensation,or for services,labor,or material heretofore or hereafter furnished,all as imposed by law,and not shown by the public records. F. Liens under the Workmen's Compensation Act not shown by the public records. G. Any service,installation,connection,maintenance or construction charges for sewer,water,electricity or garbage removal. H. General taxes not now payable;matters relating to special assessments and special levies,if any,preceding or in the same becoming a lien. I. Reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; Indian tribal codes or regulations,Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, including easements or equitable servitudes. J. Water rights,claims,or title to water. 1 K. THIS REPORT IS ISSUED AND ACCEPTED UPON THE UNDERSTANDING THAT THE LIABILITY OF THE COMPANY SHALL NOT EXCEED ONE THOUSAND DOLLARS($1000.00). SHP LATB/031 f94/soc CHICAGO III LE INSURANCE COMPANY .HICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMP Order No.: 537486 SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B (Continued) EXCEPTIONS A 1. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE & ST. PAUL RAILWAY COMPANY PURPOSE: ELECTRIC AND TELEPHONE SERVICE AREA AFFECTED: A NORTHERLY PORTION OF PARCELS B, E, AND F RECORDED: OCTOBER 23, 1918 RECORDING NUMBER: 1254827 a ASSIGNMENT OF SAID EASEMENT: DATED: JULY 27, 1955 RECORDED: NOVEMBER 10, 1955 RECORDING NUMBER: 4636034 ASSIGNEE: PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT COMPANY c 2 . EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT COMPANY PURPOSE: ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION AND/OR DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AREA AFFECTED: AN EASTERLY PORTION OF PARCEL A RECORDED: JULY 23, 1943 RECORDING NUMBER: 3324544 n 3 . EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: PURPOSE: DRIVEWAY AREA AFFECTED: AN EASTERLY PORTION OF PARCEL A AND A SOUTHWESTERLY PORTION OF PARCEL B RECORDED: OCTOBER 30, 1953 RECORDING NUMBER: 4392814 v 4. RESTRICTIONS CONTAINED IN INSTRUMENT: RECORDED: JANUARY 6, 1944, AND JULY 7, 1944 RECORDING NUMBER: 3358751, AND 3399480 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY • -HI CAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMP, Order No.: 537486 SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B (Continued) EXCEPTIONS AS FOLLOWS: SECOND PARTY AGREES TO GRANT TO KING COUNTY 30 FEET OFF THE SIDE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED LAND FOR ROAD PURPOSES IF AND WHEN DESIRED. v AFFECTS: PARCEL N. z 5. RIGHT TO MAKE NECESSARY SLOPES FOR CUTS OR FILLS UPON PROPERTY HEREIN DESCRIBED AS GRANTED IN DEED: GRANTEE: KING COUNTY RECORDED: SEPTEMBER 1, 1942 RECORDING NUMBER: 3261884 F AFFECTS: PARCELS H, I, AND L. c 6 . RIGHT TO MAKE NECESSARY SLOPES FOR CUTS OR FILLS UPON PROPERTY HEREIN DESCRIBED AS GRANTED IN DEED: GRANTEE: KING COUNTY RECORDED: SEPTEMBER 3, 1942 RECORDING NUMBER: 3262476 s AFFECTS: PARCELS C AND M. z 7. RIGHT TO MAKE NECESSARY SLOPES FOR CUTS OR FILLS UPON PROPERTY HEREIN DESCRIBED AS GRANTED IN DEED: GRANTEE: KING COUNTY RECORDED: SEPTEMBER 4, 1942 RECORDING NUMBER: 3262713 AFFECTS: PARCELS E AND F. • 8. RIGHT TO MAKE NECESSARY SLOPES FOR CUTS OR FILLS UPON PROPERTY HEREIN DESCRIBED AS GRANTED IN DEED: SHPIATF33/32-I2-90/EK CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY .HICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMP. Order No.: 537486 SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B (Continued) EXCEPTIONS GRANTEE: KING COUNTY RECORDED: AUGUST 27, 1957 RECORDING NUMBER: 4828068 L AFFECTS: PARCEL I. rr 9 . RIGHT TO MAKE NECESSARY SLOPES FOR CUTS OR FILLS UPON PROPERTY HEREIN DESCRIBED AS GRANTED IN DEED: GRANTEE: KING COUNTY RECORDED: SEPTEMBER 25, 1957 RECORDING NUMBER: 4836103 N AFFECTS: PARCELS A AND B. o 10 . RIGHT TO MAKE NECESSARY SLOPES FOR CUTS OR FILLS UPON PROPERTY HEREIN DESCRIBED AS GRANTED IN DEED: GRANTEE: KING COUNTY RECORDED: AUGUST 6, 1968 RECORDING NUMBER: 6387732 p AFFECTS: PARCEL D. Q 11. THE PROPERTY HEREIN DESCRIBED IS CARRIED ON THE TAX ROLLS AS EXEMPT. HOWEVER, IT WILL BECOME TAXABLE ON THE DATE OF THE EXECUTION OF A CONVEYANCE TO A TAXABLE ENTITY AND SUBJECT TO THE LIEN OF REAL PROPERTY TAXES FOR THE BALANCE OF THE YEAR FROM THAT DATE. TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 102305-9094-04, -9077-05, -9072-00, -9277-03, -9278-02, -9057-09, -9120-02, • -9201-04, -9292-04, -9084-06, AND 516970-0073-03 LEVY CODE: 2145 ASSESSED VALUE-LAND: $ NOT DISCLOSED ASSESSED VALUE-IMPROVEMENT: $ NOT DISCLOSED SHPIATB3/12.12-90/EK CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY .HICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMP Order No.: 537486 SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B (Continued) • EXCEPTIONS w 12. MATTERS DISCLOSED BY SURVEY RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8008289010, AS FOLLOWS: FENCE ENCROACHES SOUTHERLY OF THE NORTH LINE OF PARCEL N a 13. THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION IN THIS COMMITMENT IS BASED ON INFORMATION PROVIDED WITH THE APPLICATION AND THE PUBLIC RECORDS AS DEFINED IN THE POLICY TO ISSUE. THE PARTIES TO THE FORTHCOMING TRANSACTION MUST NOTIFY THE TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY PRIOR TO CLOSING IF THE DESCRIPTION DOES NOT CONFORM TO THEIR EXPECTATIONS. s NOTE 1: THE FOLLOWING MAY BE USED AS AN ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON THE DOCUMENTS TO BE RECORDED TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF R.C.W. 65.04 . SAID ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS NOT A SUBSTITUTE FOR A COMPLETE LEGAL DESCRIPTION WHICH MUST ALSO APPEAR IN THE BODY OF THE DOCUMENT: PORTIONS OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTH HALF OF SECTION 10-23-5, AND A PORTION OF TRACT 6, VOLUME 38 PLATS PG 30. AS OF APRIL 15, 1999, THE TAX ACCOUNTS FOR SAID PREMISES ARE 102305-9094-04, -9077-05, -9072-00, -9277-03, -9278-02, -9057-09, -9120-02, -9201-04, -9292-04, -9084-06, AND 516970-0073-03. END OF SCHEDULE B • S H P1ATR3/12-12-90/EK CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY i 4::::1 CHICAGO '1'1'1'LL. .NSURANCE COMPANY 1800 COLUMBIA CENTER, 701 5TH AVE (206) 628-5666 IMPORTANT: This is not a Survey. It is furnished as a convenience to locate the land indicated hereon with reference to streets and other land. No liability is assumed by reason of reliance hereon. . East % of the Northeast % West % of the Northwest % of the Northwest 1/ of the Northeast 1 Section 10-23-5 i I, t ,,.. ,D L__ s_ • S OI •,. 1 ♦ • 1 i , I co , � N Y a ; • d T 1 a1 • i ' . re i. I t . AMMOCr) il� ' _ i 6 I y I 0 iv rl)1 �.-6 rY ,w„ 1 � n-w•• •w L E.-;16TF1 ST, Y • I 1 .t 5Lee. I z 0 CHICAGO '111'1!. INSURANCE COMPANY 1800 COLUMBIA CENTER, 701 5TH AVE, SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104 IMPORTANT: This is not a Survey. It is furnished as a convenience to locate the land indicated hereon with reference to streets and other land. No liability is assumed by reason of reliance hereon. • ...... v• I ?� . II o aCT/ ... • rm.-7, ----- I ar• •••0 I I • yam• . I l - CO _ A y c�MI• •• N•1•U y 11 I .11 I NU ^mil? II •,a• I •'••r I. /\ ,_. ...... I • •- t;m T .• t.0• ? v.N t �•11• I 4t' 8 0).` ,,..• I I i '' aslo ? •Ma it .a• ? s w aS ,J,p1i,.�x.lr.x r J 3 / d��. ,, I W COUae•e ae.• t; •... i 7 — �'• 1—L7—.__,-. .as-'L.•—�a•taL—T. 1 I, ; .• ... I goat,'4 II N , ,ell 1'•c rr.••..cam• i t 0 ; • ..', . ; h AiJ . shAOY' A l a li . •••. .,,,a L NE wl esA�) --' ;{1�y.[ o / I) DO' k C.r..... •afs �r •� a a a \! X :i, ss.s �., i - N named• ....✓,"r., ..�la,M— ". �.... -1. ^' �� I • r.•..•....•.• I i I t '' 1'••s ,. rr 4r, 1 IOr t '.iltI I i .2 IV) t = ,, — °ail i' i t ' Y� ° oft' t, ,.,.•1 ,..�` t .. 7 . .' fq ,• , sow I ••: „ • 1J11 1 1•t11!6tou —W I,, 'J• y-.Y• . •••a 1' `, r LOT t� � •e1!t:' • O\ aL : yr�,.• 1,• d, year ,re ••s 'I _ r.'"ll I••' 'o� ,t { MIO • I+��a1 j1 r Ir f • �a . 1 '•.••!•N�/ •I,•,NI 1 ; Qf.•wf.awy J .•.�r.�.'I' l� T .I 4j1 I ; 1��"'I t ° : !4 i! 4 LOT 2, 'I: r' eti„ `,e''i.:r•••••",. I I.1 ,°, a •n:A•• ....PI.1' , I f' f� `� :;APO•, .. nr.'t ,� 1 j` .,.. IC ,‘ t.' ::•'``. ,%1•' LOT I :; ^t•.:.' t(Ct..;'•. i 1• •°° r J ;1 ill "" a i• it s p,`,, ; .t t c2 ,ii ---; Tt0 '•.� • i` [—•—:4 aaH eat. { ' �� ~j° • , ,• .'�� •..Z�G ry' ; j �; Met V\4• e,i 2 11 3 t < i •' C.• .) . , : c 1RCM IP 131•PS I, I0011U0/1 ION tI f10 n 1,110011atW, j it Lor! „ of Lor 30 t t LOT t t LOT♦ v �• f,, s� •rr w .... .•►n rr .•••7rr rw ,J�e s�/ ` -• • 5lieet- 2 2 MAP '-1 /30 JOSEPH P. MARSHALL TRACTS. ▪.,-, ..EC0'r'• SCALE t• -700 1• ri•...or•r nw DESCRIPTION Tw �,�o,TN( l T rA Of SEC ]D1wP 7N• SI...YT EnCEors COSER:Cun..Cp.03.ALL or C[ ALLCOVUSCS ANC ONCNOIONS•o(A3 SNOWN Ca T,C rKC d TNa3 R.T. ALL rONYYCNT]••C AS SNOW N ON f•CC Of TN13 PLAT. DECLARATION. • I M y 1 A + ` ,' ANOY ALL rC V En TICS(•/GENTS TN•T C.O.(vOCr•31GNCD.30 s(rw••waas•Ai o...0 • .Nr(C S•Y•LC 0•TNC..• D NO NEAEOr PLATTE NCREOT CEC.N.0 TN13 PLAT Of icoc YAM .. ,V N W SC FF. WN[a[Of IN•vC.E P[vNIO T>r...NO AND SIN.TM1!•LZ_ • I 'iSE?u 722.AOr,..,A _ ,..z I5 t I ACxNOw�EDGMENIT . 3TATt Dr L.LIr0SN1• 1 ss rN•i COON TT Of Lp ANGCLC3 P•�_- .•t.ra•r••ar �r .vrJ 13 TO C[•T;n TMAt ON TNT S }�!0••7• •7 0•7.6C MOr YE,INS VraO(O- w•n a(•-.: _•C}• Y•gN•u rO NE...00P TOOL 31-c E0.ANCTAaT o•JSL•C.P(a30N•_v•P v .^ +N(e(TSC1N Two E.E:JTEO TNA f Zar1;�.YG JE:-•°•'- .• •.n0•G.NOMLEOG[O TOPE . •..T-C71CNE0..OSE•LE0 THE S•YC AS 1•.3 V AJ.1•i..C. •NO DE[0 FOR THE YALTA.° 14 S `i 2 OVum33C3•NCOC:N YEN TI ON E0. •• , r1TN(31 VT NANO ANO Orr.C.I•SEAL INC CAT A.0 TC.a NAST AOOV N C w1NTtC �( !II iii n.a•r a rei n,r.•r 2i..•:a.rw..-_- 1( aIM;IVr•. r..n.N.'a •. •V•rN•.V.rrY • • 13 - 3 . `- FCSTRICT IONS. _yLar:wY.cNAPE•[ataN- r• PCOT.ON Or pT..S•L Crrror•..: O.r CWN(tlNJ _ `=....CT.CO ..y;_o oa•Esc- .•r•anto r• . 3t +a�CTEOTI RP•.E.-S far9.t a,;-�••° . ovine..Cr TN•S PLATSNALL -1 I u.rrr V•r ..• .r CJ••Y.CD Co••INCAaal0.Q- .c, sTATtO C•.TNLt PLR( • m« •• I OC LCS S TT.AN TN[••A•SIC•CO fO_T..0-. J L T•.LTS..TICS iL•T..(•f3.R•'•Ei•�5-. •:.i•�REAM 4E7a1.'.T USE.ANO.OL SV O:CCT TO TNL PRCV.S.ONS Of or Sv.J T'OV•C••••.L•h.fVTY OC•YE NCr[NtS 12 i' t 4 ,.Cv[TO f vo`•, i 'PI War ` [:Aw.NP0 AN0 AP••CVSD _ • a ; d-.. ' }„1.�._ .o.....•.....ar_rA,t•mw•sr.•�C• •r1 'r s, 10 =1` I I I ' •L% •ROVED'•••3_ r..O.T Or:.".Es• 0 •PA3. j\. �a. E • ••�� .1•T orirt.r.m..i•mi:a.at. r.•w i( ems' s•: 1-Coca•CC•..r•-+.•T... •...N L,•T Of. .CO.•Y•a SN•LL•a•CTS 1S NEREOV C -.SOP T••E.NG COVNTT+L•w..0 GCw SS:•TNy:0••LP r-LL!•O Mt s ___-lira:.•,- -704.i •, nts•••(:ruiaiwri w•iv • 7 • 6 32504.42 9 •• 8 , f1t CO rO•P(CO.O AT TNC PCOU[3T Y..L•iN;:C yY�No KGG•OCO CN Y:SS10N MY_ T _ _ •OLYYC 3• !i • .wt CS.•7 _ [.OATO .7:... S1CO••03 OF..r.G C,p VNTT.w•S.sOTON. Of PLATS.rAV1C.30• - a -aCO- . •IORRI S . �i. .r3.TTT an�r1 ....Late.. Or•...SMALL TRACTS IS PASCO YPONAN _.••r. lr M 1 NC•COT CC•T:.r•-•T• S Ps,•T Cf:CS[ Y i 1N a!t.•Y •nAT TN[D•STANCC3 ,nn .M•«-.•T_1 I .CTL A.SI:PVC••.:SV90••..S C.Cr I::•-0%3_•��,. n•i INC••• YEVTS_A•.C•[EN - -- ....Icat .'.•) n L- 471a:S•Na Ah._[S•R•S-MVN 1a•t_ •wall-�.:s-wC GAOJNO.MAT LM.L'V.1.? 1r , SST•..0`T M THE/OO...S 0CS OrT.(01 CSTAT JTIS.4O rIN[aCj.<yT10N3 GO AFINFNC. (cYPL�Ea•' PLATT1a•G. .:,,--rta•li ::=ECIN L•tin:• renroVD 0•019.•••N..ty•IA.sr••(••• ::::::•• • . v a•rw.t•rr.a+• •r ••• c ."'..-- • • • .� . / . A ji =r..:3ROEO 1\74...C? 73o i•-) Cl �. '; .......•...._REQUEST Of t U' t"64 FEF 04 AM 8 3 n q r r • R +.: v. IORRIS AUDITOR ttl1; NTY WASH. diAvnrpuTy , ,„ . . .t; - N - r : • y . • c x J5 i • . •oa.. 13S • - Statutory Warranty Deed • • THE GRANTOR ALBERT HA3R and CAROLTN PARR, husband and wife, . n` for and in consideration of Eleven Thousand Five Hundred and Mo/1(0ths Oollars...(t11,500.C^) in hand paid,conveys and warrants to R.111TON SCHOOL 0-'STRI7T NO. 1,C3, KI. cowry, F-'ASr.:Nr1TOF `-.' • the following described real estate, situated in the County of King , State of t((: Washington: `, The south 530 feet of Tract 6, Joseph P. Marshall Tracts, C according to plat recorded in voltage 38 of plats, page `�. 30, in King County, Washington. • 4 • _ l _.-ref e� —.ens ow Inn t'1G.t.nt twn t„IL,'Oil - i. ,..;,_ .\i' , 3 ._• ti: •-I ._ 46**.• '--;.,-7•444' • : : •„,4.• ..." 1 '- it I t ' . ' • "T;I:tit-S`e'• . •••••• ' ,,..„, I Sit 1.14111.•• . '4" ar'" ' .... 'It 4 S4 - `., I , : ONE DOLL1t !V1'►CWS ' NI •1U •� .. .I A• J :- Ope.w11taw. .t•t n • °octet flaw. + �.'T •. • . ;lb.....30- • .•-. •. ..i......u: . • 11:trd this 11th 'lay of 'rbruary, 1ctLL r .A - •./1� .. . 0. • ' _t St'At.1 • . :.ihert Harr •-• • .-.t 1 ,_ ' ..l?..At r • 77- . = CarolfnHarr ' ?STATE -oy:IC iSHINCTO. 1 • 5f t suoiy of ' -Ring - On this day personally appeared before me ALSEir HARR and CAP-C.-TN HAFP., h sba:1! a:..1 wire; - to me known to be the indiv.dual s described in and who ese-.used the within and foregoing instrument- and - acknowkdred that they signed the same as th.Lr free and voluntary act and deed, for the r►:'. toes and purposes therein mentioned. �' GIVEN under my hand and oNscial seal this // _ day oT)//_ p �•y ..., '_t_ tY�._i,._t.t A -_ ,Votary Prblie is and tor the State of Wotkiwgton. relnlinr at i •. 777. p 1 1:A OYg wauasl . . ow . ......... mlz,p 1C 0L4. 44thar . t;ort J sn 6 44 335e751 Jan 21* 4►3 -• JceopA ? atrrfhs11 fr to J&a.*$ _Jahatoa andwagaiyn 1 Johnson, ;:if fp741.11a .11and spbnyfli re sitilraa ' Att$sned rider . Trust No 6, J oe•A ? darshal 1.2rasta, asodg to . it t:,o: for 1L.1 Apia 4700 of u 320 pd sad Sal r,d1at110 ostas27thlf fob ,-ash " r sy s bcl.:.:un 1944Z, aad4,12.5Q eatIvi 28th of Jul 27 42, sal v1230 or .o.e ,lta1yhst until p;433.3) pa cosset of prin. After pays 1,233.33 onesst ;ria an ri1, az$ xts far$466.444 .A4.14_412.50 tthlf lnt54pe u:;dics � ::� eyts j itls inx 3a4a =`��0 d� ofttt.�a� 33 pd af,4s afsTn�ltslaad for road 6? aaroei taaraxtt toi:i� ' pke rs iCexdamagtlesit+.I . -p a.a4. u-.sena3 s4. s,1a 24 pay tlitazss*asestaoc tt from at .f z•p a.is a u es allaaaZarir st damage to t pt is cut id,r a .. - aloe to ode by ao4 arid saffielaatdd . ltr,a s Lhi ssssuae mad ;1*►3alorss for forfeiture— Ja.aitbl Ji 0,11.tion 6agol,7a 0 4 oltssan w eye P liana ei 1 riblAIMUI - 1,. : !;• •i:•:;:i i." • ,.I 751---2 :.A Cc malt a til 1L 4:2 a;;- .;01,a.4 ka;a.a lat L 3 -:from ap ad aoari.d t'.ii I (ti ) co..:104. at 24 44) mla p 00014 :,ioths a w u a a,a 6 4A 3 35875. f.1u D Jul '7-44 ~ 33 339,42P >--- Dao 30-42 ; 1( . $1 .10 Iv.= 01. e-t .�r-senpti. Z.4:r+a1:11 es :ail sap wilt to Jame lt:.d'oiatiOa Qai Aaega:l7n S.Isnaaos, hs i p a7 aad r to op ties Stirs t o k s 'rrsot Na 6 t►a Sapk ,P.ka a l.1 !tali moo to v al. 1 of pl at a ;g 30 r aafoilGo (Tis dad 1.tswe d s ak,3 t~j *ate;ies witls re Goat d t;d Tao 2 -4Z) :rose* P-Atra tales Los Astates Oa Col Dos y)42 :asap& P•lesraball. bet 11.1trsl:s np tar *l rea at Lea ,oLea as i941t 2).4% ( 3e «3i'elssa, 927 3sataard Slot OLt7) ,�t I l�ITS a 5-4 3 in'''" Poop•[NPCL(A LMClOAO47a0)110![NOC►slot. 1Ct*osrn DNpOUCN[ BUU8LU90 10 tU µO RR['IT NotD iHCpSTs Fil AD iHT PPO'[R7 OWNtgl on la 11{OO tliNty%DAHRp'9(()It AS 1 UPS(°t)fXL�[INWTT fl N IrreRr1gD THAI gPEAA1L ES T•IE PSN7 70~TDP OC 4 14YPOA Ari4 t'PI' lifll•[/lE LINCI RT1 - p(j���1')ITS N(I1W 1CO t0 PINt )71PFT AND MAN 14 TPAN5PLANTEO T`O ULAC 911511f7 IPp1 ICHOQ►RO,tDTT TO A LQA ON 101)N OC T)( eraRNTT UIE. TE TO ArEO THAT Culls.; MPAD LE S1ME0 NR SOON • COUTO co TAOl M Tor 11(.4"EE7A:s d r,w 9ty UN[TO MINIMA!CU11111R TRIO!moo OISIIIRBINO samara NON To•7 T-KIPAO[ RAN PLANTED O Wm,O CR I-I b�T QF (PISTON IIOU7[ 'NITM 7ACP I-1 LAST Q. AP.1 7 S Ica.d nil - ITd , { row 1tACP A 004 -- PryP R 7T AND OOt 10117M a • 11 s7 1. 71' 7,SOE I[ LIMED.AVt 10E 50 t OAR{W notr:ird,RTPAH, �/!.I PONLANO S 7'7 101 1/00•To T. PI 70P�,.a CgrN(l1.40 0 Y I A51 V IA000 I[MCE O.S!t0 TACK M!-"_�.-.-:.-/p`l d INC, - 10P Of PAX()Ma 111 ---N SS IV OI'W ISO IS___ - ,.� . 0 OP •• • 10,ftS i)H•![T 9APT1ORN ,E1 0!w071*TRIO .'Mu\ rlw dill. Kt MP Of SPNN • O Il NC1 CDPNEP PI W WIND 9AP 9 CAP NO/113 i J 02t FPS' V LINE 1 1111 H NOT[; I ') 1 9 CHAIN UN*IENCL 1 ti , Sit Sf10 POSTS SOT .. 111 •0 S.IN[IDF Of FAST 13 l e B i85 Wl[T S {OO Llllf G41 TH L , o _ 9 t k . 1 . 2 e �� i T\ih rr. x"k 8 8 Mw- 0 ..., i a «• a 1)3 ,I a - L I Li LEGAL DESCRIPTION -_ .� THE SOUTH S30.Of TRACT 9,JOSEPH R NMRSNALL TRACTS, ACCORDING TO PLAT RECORDED M VOLIME 39 OF He1rrr ■ P1ATS, PAGE 30,K WINO COUNTY, E �.D� V SHIN/TON. 9 lo.P onn A o oi.CAso Ja%-JWYi lie !; Twe.I!w•:R 5 iw... / OC ►CTNt ITT IT TWL S 1 / /NO.IOW ►100.0[. SW ' i -- Y -- 319 TS plot --Sif{![TUHL...•I-- - '1 1119*Q 9 99.31 or E RAT [IsIL 1d I,V1L Ils[DI) .—TO II oO•KR om) lOIMD`j[ILT•IL mass MSC 5L7/[0(TiM I N 9L•V O.a IVSCO TMs AS OASIS♦ON LFAPINOSI IR�•'FiDE Ti MOMNENT 11{17U IP[1 Awl U !IA WRNEN • SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE RECORDR'SCERTIFICATE BOUNDARY SURVEY THIS MAP CORRECTLY. REPRESENTS A SURVEY \P�;�;/01 FILED FOR RECORD THIS DAY Of � 198 AT M. IN VOLUME OF SURVEYS AT HAZEN HIGH SCHOOL NORTH FIELD MADE Br ME IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE RE- )1aq;�� pH PO. Al THE REQUEST OF QUIREMENTS OF THE SURVEY RECORDIN9 ACT � Y/,� F FOR RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 403 .•••. It- MICHAEL H. YUHL ; A.,,,� AT THE REQUEST Of RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT {�')1Il„0' BY YUHL S ASSOCIATES BELLEVUE 841-2B , •OS IN JULY I9B0 l 1 JULY 10, 1980 SCALE 1••SO• -- MGR. SIIPT Of RF C01j s - ' • • �j' � a rn 1'ay�"f�•'�''v. zry:.: r '�;1 _ yyr R• a~* - : tZ ' ats -.sass{- "1 • 'r ` •2 44 1�+ ip i. • Z�Ise =r < Yl '. "�.i. rE r G t 'ro _ .ss.i �:, f:�.- SEISINEW- . • CI_ ~OL-4 r', ".Zs •`` 41' fv cr i s 4 il S. ?AGE. yR' ' '4 ,;, > ;i . t.. .,rt e D( '.11, 4.••-• (_tt. • -:r:7a -.fr;'-._ 1 `;_. j'1: :•'d. •> ir.v r ''..t a C I • En • • C\t. : 1 :i, ... . ..— . • ... : \. /---1 Foam LSO -- Statutory Warranty Deed • THE GRANTOR GTz'NN •R. MILLIKAN and MERIi.YN L. MIL,IKAN, his.wife, / - for and in consideration of Nine Thousand Six Hundred and No 100the Dollars in hand paid, a.meys and warrants to :i-iiTON SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. h03 ( 9,GGC. trj -, - the following described real estate. situated in the County of King , State of \Vashingtnn: ■ The west half of the south half of the east half of the east half of the northeast quarter of the northwest quarter of section 10, ®: mom to'.:n nir 23 north, rnage S east, '•'.`.., in King County, '•'ashinfton, -- ''rC :?T the south 30 feet thereof convoyed to King County for road . by deed rec^rdcd under auditor's file 'co. L4797337,.and °YC= ® north i fei t rcr.•of.. \ NO :„....,'01 t Ni,,:,,,"...„.,'. ,, i.11r.a...".1k:or:: ...i...,.„ , y�,1�J �1� •.�J AjL :'.7'...... 7,,,, ,1 .. ....„....., ii,...... .... AfE Ho.j,_c `�s�Tt"'.._ s .. 10' _.4. ._ ''..)- . r.Or gliki.'1,. 'ig . NA, 141 NNN . ri iJ ,a. a.Is ` rsrrar:us.: ranwsat: �_ , I ra7nRNlisa,ip flu Moms la/s 10':4i :10 •i:::.:i, Dated this 11 th :lay of ,i une, 1?63 1 .,/. •1 F- 'a+-`L I -� 1Li�. o - .im At) ' r - ' u.rnn . \'i1:ikar. -. "-. `'uI ( l L' r / / // a .�, . .. . er�l �.�✓i1 i L. . ,.....1.." r�f.(�r.at t - i ..... ... , -..,......, $„,..,....-....„,..,„,,s.,I NI;I Ws, 1 (1 (1n this slay iwratmally appeared helore.mr Gi.`:;: et,, r:T1.i.IKAi: and Y"t•T r; v Lti,, hies .ife, • to me known to be the unhv:drulp described in and who ramified the within and foregoing instrument, and atknoaltderd that they signed the same a their free and voluntary act and deed, for the -;r" uses and purposes there.n mentioned. An , te,iGIVEN under my hand and official seal this If day n( /, tt,e„,X...../..t../Let—ese„........-e. ,Votary Prblk is end for the Stale of Wiahnitws, "` `5'' .. residing at '' . �L . `'„..-:-..,....,;An . ___f ..--- • . ---, . - - .. " - , .. * ...... ... ••• ,' ..-.-, . ... _ . , • • •..,+4-- .. • ._i..•••1_•_•"_-•% 7 _%" .4' 4____.....,...,....• .,,,;,-.•_....---.1.rif:r:-i.•-3 •'••••. ---y:-;-:!-- - ,-::.-„tfV. ' ,•S-v' .p..,e ,-'4..:.!•.:.-,i'--,•-..'-:-.•;.•.:;,-;..-7.,-.-1,--;-"-'!",,*.-."--..•...:n-r.:•'.'•t'--•'•r.i'.".,,;.;1•;.4.4,•-4•.:.'f,...;.i•,4`.1•;,•-•'1:.'.'!'2;--r.:.r•..t.:,',_/,.:S..:„•.y..Z...-."..:,,., r - a :..-7--,".--•-..,.--.,;f-.',........, -,__ ,. --'- • r. -4.'44:".;,7-.7-_•7.:-.74,- ...,-;":4•TrIt4Iiii-f '-' • . • • ...;'.:-.:`-' -i- t.".. -•''''? 4•.i.: '".2t$rj - r3",i-71.-- ------.----'" ,,-,- • '-' - ' e;..-A•41:: 7ir-:.:.,p‘.-',,•••••,;';_i•i--X1.40Z-45•14.7%, `*4.-Vb''' eta,- -. - ‘.. "-::,--'-",;:!'..%!;-'-7,`••::-"-..f,-.t.:"""•!• ,lir-. X si•:‘44-‘,. • '• - g:-.5- - - • . :. .-a ...2A'',*;:. .;;.•.,.-•:t'r..-%•-.21.f,t.:•I' tC:44111r-e % 141.-- -z-xf2.;4-f- --.1-yav- , ni rg'k"-'2;:'' tz . ri • -- - , _-....,„- -. - . -,..:,(.., .."-;-174:14'.::-0. -4 • "' ..owt?. • ..Z.- ,, - .... 1-: fiA - ' ‘' •,-: :Th'-i-F. ' ',:!* ' --- ,.. ,.. -.C4..t 1, ... , '342.01.•a•;'' -et • . ' •••.4 . Vi' -'*. ..,•••••: N -.0 • - r ..,-4.1.....-- - ---.).- ,-- .iii....A.4 . 4.y.•' ,.....:- ,*".?,,.• -'.• d• ' Ne' ••••,,• • -4 ''''*". ..-•---- ::-,41, =,- t;-t4,-•$, . -"t":"--- ',- ,, St-s"," -,-1-1 •, - .4`."..p_et. -5. - - •. •, ...it .ie,...-, ,,,,,,,n. .,-;,,, ,ii •., . 7.,,1!1... •4' -„,r,,, „,!. ,-k . • , . • .., - 1 A , - * ' • • --,-; •..it,. .• • - . • -. 7....,,s..,..,. . % S... .0.,5... 2. . . , . i '....... 1.4.•••'`11,... •,i -,:`,j . •.1••- 1::-= . -.;.•10 '.4- t-44 4 • VOL- "' 7•:77•::: EfIteSe•'. - ' -i•t.' '' ...'1)!'1 .. 'il• L ,r." IR .; r f4' •;-* 1:::::•oc'41; f-21;;;PACE=;,-- -,4-,vt,,,,4 ,.. ,,,I..- . 8.1,Q. .. , t.., . 4, -... i. ... #1: ,.,- _ - - . - ._ --.__. ...1 f,. . - 465;.Altikze4. . -'741."-:".»:-,--ILS.--r-r:441-411:ji'4%;:••ir:9•ct'''';'!.• 14-4. 1:.2"e-`• -' !lb' 4::•.t ::-- •--: b. • ,Ns 4ya ., • N 1, ' r - . : '-‘,-,C.: 14 - - ' 7'- '•4='' . iii k 1,,. .r, li'l .2MtW' ei-V»_.%:''':14.•1)-c:L.0., ,_'".4.3"-g'-f•i' gt7-'..--:r--,;21'.7" :" -:.Z. l`P -1 ,z '1. ''. "'• 3* . '', 1 •-, .. .-• 1 "•• • %-i kr,. ;: .-..9•- ';',"•?...7 ? 'tr'ist'''''""'",t`-• -• 91,4; ..T--•.... -•.v.1-....2...• •, z.,• cs, „;:,.-, 1,.,, ,,,t.....-,,, 1, •;., ., • . • ... ;i; ...,,:vx 10-6,ur..• ...• • .: -2 • .,-• t-•"-• •••' -----•0 ••P•I'• ' L1:i. 4 ...- . ._,.., - ... -.., 4 •',.T••,4'" 4-•--''', 1••••- • -'.,.r-A-.., 1--,-, • - • - .-,-• -,- - . --. •• ss.:kr ,---1••• 4I.-.F-3- c., • •• .s....--bi-7- 7.est, ...,-....4,1a.:,.-.1. ,.. t- .''"....".• ..'''' ' '• ' " u2,,a,..1. _ _tii, ic., ,... .„ NI•':"-: . -,' -,.- • ' -. ,•• . ' MM•7''--. ---iwi: " • It,---: .4.2-..F,14ri,Ft. .v .,..._ ' • 11 0"' ' -11;•3*--:::)''4, •:.'''`k.!"-`.....,••••••1,--II V2.-Sita.:,. -- 1 V.,•41:4 1..,_,,IP• .11/ _4e: ,--:m. s' 4•:. '1 •-- - . - - ...sr..•• -, •• ,•-,.e., •••;.,;,..-47,....g.!z•tyl.tt,„•t-, •• - _,, -e•• .' •-..-...,,,-2..eir....,x ------- g 1'e* ,* O.- • ::-.::"....kr."4:-'-i•-' ;•;•• j'i liri.Slt - 't" • ' ? Ui•';'0.4 J.- -__,- , I ;"-. .:. 4 `1.14?'. 2•', ' ',:. -1'. . - -• wer,, ,,, 13• ..,- - : , i. -141.... - F.-:_v.:T ; .;.;-a„,;;:t.".s."..64 i'-'47;re i':'-;:. '---.1 ' 2.,', 1 4,•.-1-1i- -'Z s' Sf ' ''''.. :; 7•7 • .,. ?;.:,.,:t.'e.;&. •-,•-;`.;--.-:,1- ' - ='..-- .,' ';',,-1•(-1" -` i.f.2- ,` '-, .---:- • ''' (/)' '" ' ., +-.."-*--;.rT,--'7'."-.7' . ----': t. ,- ' ..- -'-...,,-;', 1,,-"'-,7,.':'i.:"L.. • , `, , i , ' :,. ji -,1 i.-. ..!•••• - .-- • - .. ,._,..!1,-'1,_ , ...1 . .,,,.-:.p.. • f.'... -, , -_ , 1 •,,, ,-• , . : - - , . -- -• , • • -,-Ic .."4 • -•-.• 1.1:4--•:"- '"'-- " -'-';'"'"4"..--,11,'''.1r'..1 '••••• ' • • , - • -••'..• "_-•,-.-:-.1t•••••-••'-:.I.:••-•t• ,.-':-,•.•.. . •‘--. -.. - - '.•-. 1 ---._ •- -r-(7-$: . _ •, ..- . ••••_••'.-"!---,?''.. ,'. • . ' " • • , - . _ 1 '• .' - -• . . - •-•• ". - ':',.;-4 Statu tory Warranty- Deed. . - .. ,. . • • . •._ - - • -• ..: .. . ..s.-- • - . - .-- .. . • " I ' ' .. ' : - 1 .- ,.,..•-, , ,- -. . _. . st. THE GRANTOit ALLF.2: L. Eag.•,H, J . and J1.1117. Y. RUSH, his wife,• . _- . „ .... • • • _- , • for and consideration of" Twenty One Thousand and No/10Cths Dollars ($21,000.co) '.. .•-_, - - t - :-•:"- -- •• •• - -,a , - in hand paid.cnnseys and warrants to RFNTON SCHOOL DISTRICT NO.• 403 . - •• - • •.. • -• - - • ' . the following described real estate,situated in the County of King ,State of . .0 .-; Washington: , 1 • North half of east half o east half of northFast quarter of rorthwect • -,:.-1,--. -.:.; •,..-., quarter o' section 10, tow-ship 23 rlorth, rant e 5 cast., ::.'-'., ir: r..g _I County, *.asn t.ii7ton; -XC7.7r the nort,h 3C feet for road; and i•inEilingin Tast half of sot L half of east half of'east half of northeast -.7uarter .:•- .•- - • of northwest cntarter o: section 1.-i, tosrnshir'23 rorth, ra re• 1- east; • • - •• -- MEI -:::.- ''..:--=::-• in '-rit.t• ;aunty, ...:ashir.rton; ::•)7.7.F.:-T the nortii 30 fert thereof for and F.',1:,•-•T thr. szr.:th 30 feet thereof corve:,..ed to Fi.::ti: Co••nty for roa:: rAirrores by on d recorded under auditor's file ro. It.1361D3. . . pi 1160T•D r S 4 "..i.R. 41.4.•'r" :8 ...-•-•.****..**** .0 .....: .... -,.. .. . 1... ....-..- ...... .., . - . • * 1%...... iii.0:: ;-. : .fiC, ----,CiLav _..........._ f ' ' ; 1(1;-41-1Lalik c..1 • R:: --i-,. 741X .. f s', •-,•v.: =MI • : 'NW 11'(e•x_/5c.r7..,I--ti7 l7i'r..1-7.-.,7,.,:;:-•1,i:.:"1 i ii '-r.--„aJ.1_ %...s:'. •00,-°X VETANI'CesEc.S-,-•,'' ..'..'.'.'.a„.IlR,--,,.,,.-.... M..*NA..i 111•V•I1.nk.i..l.li7..•. . 7, idk .,..r. 1..1•),1 i..-,.,r) iI = %PIi0,,,n . : juL.i f.. 14" : r„„r„ . . . .„, i i ;Li....._... , .•-,--,,••'.•'•-..a-.•-•,,.- s-..,._,.•,-::"I.-.e:.-..,•,i •,k.,.• 44',•-' •-,;;;"ao.,,.. A :..,-*•s.---•.v. , i i ..,.. ma at; :':'-‘4.4,..- ' ..',- ....%l• • ,-,:,.. , ? / - , r =NE 5 - v „; ..z.... , ' • :---t-'.:-...,-- ''::4:.:1- ."','- . ' . . ' :•••‘.. . 1 .,,,.. i ..-- : •- -.--.-4'-. , • ..,;( 1..-• - 1 . 1.. 4,e6,‘ •,, ••.., V '... •f a. ' , ..0 ' (•,,,,,,lp,.....rvle .-%,.. , '• •'''' . " 1 II . ji%.:1111;itlf."' ' •al..f..nr•• - •• •SO I.0.••II•Ir- '.., .id jsrems1(on . • ."'"*2 - --' I,.1::Iii•I I TEN semis orr Doilik . .1 -- ,, - . *;'"-• - ---- '- - . ....1.......... • .--.-... 1/aird this • • llth day of June, 13 . .•,.i -, 1 . , .,.• . - .• -- • Alien 1..-Rutsi, 4.7 - '--"EALI . •116..".,- : ,./ , "1-• : '•4k -. • • -• • • - ... , _, ,,k) - , :'' - • , •, .•:"• ir,..4.44(..c.., ......(2t• 4"..4.J4-/s:...., (Ism I . .. ..... L .......... ••••.::•,. .: .‘,:-STATE OriltikillINGTON, I . .1 e Y. husi.., .." • . , • r ' '•.c clunty.'of, • xing 1 . _ .. .• . •• ••• - On this day personally appeared before me ALL"; L. R1131i, .1:-. and J'."7 Y. VS", hir wife, • mg __ to me known to be the individual n describes' in and who esecuted the within and foregoing hutrument, and acknowlidged that they signed the same as their free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. 0 , • • . . L . . , 1 /9‘w•q c. •‘. • CIVEN under my hand and official seal this // ••••P day oljg•--' (-444...- ' ' •- •• . - - • ... .... • -Notery Pub& ler She Stets el Wesbingtot, -• ":•:1" ' '' r: • • - • I ''.. : ..•:1'..:--' - •;-''4; . e'rr (11 rt.' •• 1.'•-,•,Oti•tf•-1. t''''''' ,' ''''' ' .. residing as - ...641,, ,,.., • •••., 70.4,„.-:. .,-.1,...... ..,,, ,...i, •_ .,., .....I • . : ,-i..„-.,--: • . • . 4 .... ,. ..... WL. rf,- -. ^7R.:.os.�, '3+.Z _ - +o.a�NTL• .;. v ,� ,f ` I iqf"1�, - - f` yt-•� 37 fteT'/ ''.Yltsr 1.Y"'s� r 1 ♦ k' ;.4,Sf _-':'-- F x•/ r 1� - • Si • ..t '.y� ,,}� %1 J r ,5 Een 1 11 v'...y,•. la.t tb' as.r +Y sae• �' ' "' >... c.. •ate--•-- .r .- -' - *.. =-'4. ;;iq 4.i. "iil,i._ = ,.., a- . ,, - . --,' ,.. -.,...,•er--tiriv.q.i, • 1-3- ....sq.-v.14 cY.-.,,lz .;.„-_,-;.. "..r R . • O 4 • c+4.. . Yv` A.196.1114 tilt.•barr. 7 4.Y'r"''n'�Sr .. 4...— ° a - 1 ; ..' .., i,; risk\ SRO• EPT A j1RR 5 AU91 ORs "f 9'.o' • - - tt' _ :`.,e ,k., ,•:I K z ' `} .tit;t3 COUNTY WASH. c V!-1 3 3 ' \ s , : . O:PUTY o jy� � 4, _ 2 t�f lJ"y • t � '' rr if I. IA '-` ' Statutory Warranty Deed '. �4: "a..A (r) THE GRA.\TOR WILLIAM B. BRANIN and V!P.LYN FRANCA, husband and wife, •.. ..,n " for and in caa,deration of Twenty One Thousand.Eight Hundred and No/100ths Dollars..($21,800.re) i ,�� =;ti o M in hand paid,conveys and warrants to REN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1t03 . We following described real estate,situated in the County of King ,State of aft. .. . '`= The south half of the noviwest :uarter of the rorthwest ;K ,_'.�•_, = quarter of thenortheast quarter of section 10, to.nship +=:a'.•" 23 north, range 5 east, W.. M., in King County, Washin ton a '•1 EPT the north 15 feet and EXCEPT.the south 132 feet of '` ''• '; the east 330 feet thereof; also EXCEPT that portion there- �; t; °flying within the east 3C feet of said subdivision cnn- _:_' 'rr~-^"-'; PI;.• veyed to King County for road by deed recorded under ;�'1--;: t. auditor's rile No. 3262.u76. - 1/A/1 " `r " i .Pmnst- 'a '• ( t� i �%�r1! .:fa.•.. 'I,-.+.• ;S"/•ir '{ t11tt irh' . yy(HC1Tfr�-,l G, �tf,,, .'f?;;y,,. !�4 S �,F .s; �- ;tiI ".”, ,y:�. � -. o• 6,, P � o ;-!; .� a `✓ s Sp�yy r C y f \ ....•A.A• -t ~ 1 S42 , ipin '• War, i .t �C7 !ark� r:y� Z ^,(o) S t-to ga lS� of fi + % •.a �h • .• . •t J�S - I 1 __ 1 .` .„ �'• :P.•` •'a•': wu'•.w. Rom.�"•.'.�. ' i 1:•. c+i+ou+t or+n/ art +e 0 - tt i y ut.":,L a {/��/ i i3 ".00, .� .�� .J=.C*VI uwt-.I. 7vr,+f0rrr irt9V� +": „4 1i'.I,:,,;I .�' TEI DOLLARS f two Mar 73t�•:. ... tr ~ :. npcu�r.rawi n Iar+ :.• .',�' . •.4 • .S• V Dated this 1st day of Nov ber, 196'2 • 01. b. ,%i,��T,,,.A.�•: i-'J.GC +.. • 1STSZt-•--�� (SEAL) •, • • : .P;' :`w.� • 7eT r n#n..-C�1.��- (SeAL) fir 4"Ei}T5\0ri WASHINGTONr i • } _ 4-�bdYiy�d}• King 1 • •,, ,. ,'- On this day personally appeared before me 'ILLIAM B. BRAN IN and 1(Pril.Y`l BRAND:, husband and wife, to me known to be the individual isdescribed in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and . !• acknowledged that ' they signed the same u their free and voluntary act and deed, for the , uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN under my hand and amcui seal this / -f- day of/%n a, 4 ,3ffiLill Notary he* - Jt Stott s/ Walagfws, f — :Ill 7---711/ - ; x;f�� r`} '��rft S. c 2494 : - ` •s +• 'l•*.•r{7� �i��+.-t. -? t•;.�� j , 7r . . • • _. : , '' � 7 T•a.� t ! il.� '1 } �• 7 } ( ` �3r^ti. ty,.1 i4 1.a.::� i_,j1"•..?^'iV _ k"a .t -44; }l s 'F 4Qbn-•bl � _ to, . -"AI :'mkt': -••,:.-(1-." (t4.:-.. ..-1.-.5.* .• - ,i IV::.1.. aelbib-.1--.. -,.7..ti•••' -.il..-1-14}. • -,..-,-. •f.. - ),1,,, -, .i:. . Rti - /,f- ftia. f * ,.'i7 }. 43 p t-j Z s i ` , 2` • '* i,Z.►, a �+�. lz 4' • -sai1t4e1 #• ' �i u T N .>- j r', 3 f ?^. '` a '_; ' 3 _! ~j. •,t, ii-`"'•10,-,-zi.'-e.,46"...i. . "c_.fi;:-.,':-c...'s"?.- . 1 - otinviviks1,,-.7,` •,-,,--A. tit. :r :,,, ..:. .7.:-_e: k 1 � } tom.- :# - � jam( -"',• _y� � JS } Icor Lsa 1 I� Statutort Warranty-Deed • THE GRANTOR LATER J. LCHR and LOUISE H. LOHR, husband and wife, for ar►1 is consideration deratioe of Eight Thousand and No/100ths Dollars ($8,OOJ.00) ;. • •'` in hand P .conveys and warrants to R/ITON SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 403 •• t,. the following desuibed real estate,dnuted in the County of King , state of IP �• The north half of the west half of the east half of the northeast C'• . quarter of the northwest quarter of section 10, township�,+ 23 nor;.h, range 5 east, V. M., in King County, Washington, EXCEPT the ^orth .', 275 feet thereof. 4 r4 t.. i atl .N4 •, • his - - rtUtl r'[1�1F4 1 - f�� /4 a rs it 1 I : tfii►ssirtl i, _7 I , y f raw �• .; ;mac O eq.• {{ Alt,:`,,,, i t4 1: • .... • ,' .;f'1 •t jp� i •:~ .1•4 v \at 1 G :� 'hIM1:MI:lt'.Nrt• ••- :,v.< , •�,.r ', is ‘' �, r �w t.• m IS • mj .� .iAO0lfl•11RCi - • ` —.- w /9� 3 .day of v , ,,:. Lester.J. Lohr tcut) r'-'�.- °' L;• z-. Louii i(g: ?..a r 1 ) .-Jk ./(,awt•) _' .:ara:: i .,* air, / itiiiTUN. -•• ...1rwr,,.�1 �} y �., .77, ei i a7{ ed e ,f LFS�$ J. LOIIR and LOUISE M. LOHR, husband and wife s • ';: ih to„ia latar� fr'ihko 1• asRibed`In'aad.do i'Yesa+tted'the wields sad foregoing 'gamiest, and : 2 1.u.t`,J :s +lei rie •at : their } her and voluntary act sad dad, In, the ` . :-.., 4,:r;,._7....z.t r;v,irkr)..,...:2 ...,-qt.,04..stlic,..-.j....„.,..:..-,',...*- • . . . ' '.j..--' ' .,•,7,•e -• ;..-... • . 44 I',-....,r7y„,„.. 7....,,,. „. „. ,....,,,,..,.:_:.....,:„...1 1 It-I,: .:.4. -:....,-;:'.'4''•'-' -. ,• ••••. , . "try im-ra `r ,,;,.',I, : �z., w.4 • s -'a•4. I,,.,,.y y ` }+ �af.. i t �1 i :.1 ) Aittalr Tom"", .*the.Sate ej 11'aakilttr i ✓ ,'t • T r#J•. p�.- r,�, • 7 y }r. •..�r+ �w 'Ar-;n""' 1 L • ; { 1 -.�.. e Y i-40'{[irT" C. {�a.... �1,,t ' 'r �i, t-. Y���K li.. i 'AI t f 1 e . v. 1 '.4 7�tF a 1s1.t,rgt,z 74t - �� 4 ' T ' -_.:;'��,y���yy ��r lti' .1141 ra w I� } T + r - IIfY_ er a F a {{ t Y'• t��s.r '.'t?'Lti`• -tf•'�i:.,t�'i5"i. '„)11 7 -4¢ f '' < `f.sh.:-Ji•t%.ti",; + r4.-97.Z.j.� 'rt7" 0 : . . .... -- N. V. ' -.'t'#. . rod . ". .••�,•.'.5 '••:, ,: 1 a :3O i : ¢' _ •ram � t. �4.: o Y:• 715� • - �: yFO° RT A --MIS t.UCdTt}$. ;i i:T'± i~ v3 g . ', •,r{ M .Hlh, CC:riTY WASH. N. t� . r_. 0 • t DEPUTY r g M t • foam LSI • StatutoryiWarranty.Deed • i. i THE GRANTOR LORRAINE V. LARSFN, a widow, 4 for and in consideration of Eleven Thousand Five Hundred and No/100ths Dollars...(31i,5O0.00) , i in hand paid,conveys and warrants to RENTON SCHCOL DISTRICT NO. I.03 • the following described real estate,situated in the County of King ,State of • Washington: oPARCEL A: North half of the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter of the northeast quarter of section 10,, township 23 north, range 5 east, ''•.u., .f' `~ in King County, Washington( =EFT the' north 30 feet and the east 30 feet for ,..:A `.f•:'_'"_ road, and FXCEFT the east 200 feet of the north 170 feet. till cd 'e. AF.CEL The north 15 feet of the south half of the northwest quarter of the • northwest quarter 'of the northeast quarter of section 1 , towr.shi,. ti t<"r 23 north, range 5 east, •;.M., in King County, Washington, FX.CZV the east 3() ii 4' feet thereof deeded to King County for road purposes by deed recorded under -- auditor' file N .. 3262676. t. :.;....,. .ww7 I ortu I, t' ,4r 4tiisa%ire .Mp,R` Rilerc`�,- —* .,; + pa. ',3 1 f` t. }�. s s' •.1 ,,ss tin _✓l ' I—. , l- Nei" f" f� 1. • .. L. MY +KL � , •J, e _ ... a ,.er.t � ' ti1F•Un!11K' "T7tri'iEi1`S! t. --. t "#c w li Dated this 11th day of November, 15:/3. - K ll.. .,,,,,W u u i„y,. .._ .,. , ,v..w2tp■t�ti �1: �. ' ✓/: ' )'�""'-e'" �(SLtL) .fir \!l?%Yrgatd= Y.orraine V. Larsen., widow, - • 4/1v is sh ins!.: vs/ . �l y r WASNINGTON, O'¢? •Kin a , 'a. lctr g, Os this day personally app:arsd betas me LORRAINE V. LARSEN, 'widow, _ to ass known to 1M the individual do gibed is and•wbo executed the within and foregoing instrument• , and 1 ', tts• aowh alpt desd test she : - ad the/awn as Cher free and voluntary.tct and dead, foe the • r ; use tad p..>>slwe Assamaaantlowed ;.' ` GIVEN rsdr o/brad and official seal tell // i_ I 9G.a x - s,• .Aliary.P Mk jM tM StWe of WesMgtoo, t :i r * •; -t r• 4e .tt. j r"/ �,-'4,y p''e, • w« a+ f r` II .: . : E va 45597` • • - 576.5550 ���1 �3 m I }� Co toE0 . 6' . Q v.fic.., - �t?UE4T jr ' W •z ts'„7 '�r .,�j i C� t i U F,. �;T,s ....• I•o 3 ., ` _ rjy; ,.iytY ,.1r7,3 ~ 3 o i OO_ In t' fir• II , Zc � 1TY 7 r Ti r N -. .s i- 1 : ii \A t'l • ih; •.. roar L5 ° .r t, Statutor y Warranty Deed .cw. THE GRANTOR , WILLIAM EDWARD LARSEN, Executor of the Estate of - LORRAINE V. LARSEN •tn- ..,. ...�it for and in consideration of TEN DOLLARS, and other good and valuable consideration 1,i'.;w't.,, . in hand oaid,conveys and warrants to RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT NO, 403 ;;dry[ \ -� the following described real estate,situated in the County of King , State of • � , r • Washington: i . The East 200 feet of the North i..) feet of the North Half irl-d r. of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest. Quarter of the �� ism- . , �;, - • • Northeast Quarter of Section 1.0, Township 23 North, !,1 : I �: . • , Rangy, :i East W. M. , EXCEPT the North 30 feet and the t%r,. j:. East 30 feet thereof. �' -_Ltd .- S '•c:.• " SUBJECT TO: Easements, restrictions and reservations of v --;: record, "• :• The Grantor for himself and for his successors and assigns does by these '•-" �a;s� presents expre..sly limit the covenants of this deed to those herein expressed, and ,_, - :"sar' excludes all covenants arising or to arise by statutory or other implication, and ,•' "rv' does hereby covenant that against all persons whomsoever la�tully claiming or to .• ,ba. claim by, through or under said Grantor or.d not otherwise,he will forever warrant • �,,+ and clt:fend thesaid described real estate. �`; �C Ham. h z ;• ' .. . ��:Ir �W ! Cho ..,.••, y:� i,e :r isc.:' �'71' ' S5� �' i'•?'/, yip �ii �•._y'�`. ,•'`. ; ;:�.��.� _ 4 = -'"7 -� .:a,ml :.z.a .•.) 5; _ hated this {o day of June, lcl64. .1" As... •.,"�' '•••�r- mar , / 1' ; e .�C _._ �..1.- I._.- n• •.•t%CAL) ti t % Executor of the Estate of Lorraine V. 1..srsen ''.k o d Si::TE OF t,t ASHINGTON, l iigjn:e. v .a•_ .� County of King -I10f-: rai.10: `_ !• s .i<i ivr.� On this day personally appeared before me WI L,LIA M EDWARD WA RD LA RSEN • to me,.knpvin ip,{�!iv individual d.crihed in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument. and . oatuLr f 1 ackgo Adgetf�hal . .. 1• Ae signed the same as his free and voluntary act and deed, fur the ,w, ' use*and purpoaea.thet•_io'mentioned. ! x~ ` "f VEN undef my 1t4ni and official seal this ...7t., day of Ju 964, �j 1 •:'(:-- •• •-i-.i.:!.;lf• Ar.„:„.ff'46(.... ° • 1 h'utary Prblic in arid/o► the Slate of fey tkia�,ow, a •:..•: residing at Renton " '_, lH 1:r 4 ,. UMW ;. c.. • iwp UM :fin,.+.'..h,'-•"-• : - �•-, .. . _ `��'X. P . e..�-r...•;....: 4 f'�,u r �I.yr ,s„ -• K _i i'f` .�.�.s _ 4.•i, ,' ... g { tR i `� �1lfIV ►+�4489 `. t1l ���T+ Y'C :• - 11 4 •H 'C- Yr�. • :-: .1 _ Y. O mo. w�•l M- N ii,„st :.� .. ti"V'. i' t. 1 iW f}....: 1.t 3p K. y-•- -. - f ' p .i 0 ' ' '• • i:A -(fir \ -' it ? 1'� 1 '_ /��,sx0y� .1-L •$. O r.7;.�' . ,. <'' 44' 1 RO T;" 3 C] li 61 . _.• a ti , diva Ce NTYts■.U NTGI, Q ~ + < z - '04,...--,tg � 'a. �- O r Rij� t„ • ., to . Zy r; DEPUTY-, le. v, - F „-• r. jq•.• _ _ • 3ti•.1 roan t }. :-rd:_• Statutory. Warrantyeed D • ".-;? . THE GRANTOR BIRTON B. BALDWIN and NANCY BALDWIN, his wife .; •441,"4%`•'"' tor Lad in consideration of Two Thousand and No/1DOths Dollars ($2,000.00) ,•" '- '+tr.- _ in hand paid,conveys and warrants to RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 403; KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; ! .•, a Municpal corporation; ."" '.'n,• ":% the following described real estate,situated in the County of King , State of ,. 3 y �! V.'&shinaton: i�: •*.•54 :e•• r. `;Nt^y.;z-t • The east 90 feet of the crest 180 feet of the south halt of the following described tract: �:4 V.Y The north three-quarters of the southwest quarter of the northwest quarter of t`e north- ""` x`'i`'•- :y: east quarter of section 10, township 23 north, range 5 east, W.M. , in King County, ri;•,• Washington, EXCEPT the south 264 feet thereof and EXCEPT the north 25 feet for road. 3s* ;" =it ', s �!..,41. L •'. iTi . y +.F.f• 4 're 4EY f ' JF s fi [1 11C3T. r � r •! trrA sY � .9 • . q e 4;4. AA-' .f ft:� rt. A• g \Lt._ lac. Yj..-fir a .1 _ y'1• t> .1.� ••i�M`� • 1+. •I=rt4 FV 7nr. .�1 wo YYW11W1• •.,,••.t�'i i.�'e N' ' .i. . . -�'= q� Dated this i 2 th day of March, 1/965 / r '" ^' r. ! /• 1 ,.i% .� /,/ " - ��.. r •.r�6G17z 1Z �(slatl .. ..�;+;S.;:? '`frrrtrn Tifw)� `I►t •c Y,, �� t"t'C -( �- tit (aa..t) �"�:'. � .'A,q Nancy Bald,$ln 1 ."`: *'!a1�r"• STATE OF WASHINGTON, r " t }}fi�t ss. t". •-:•- ' }v' County of K1ng ••t .,'n��;+lY.7; .'fie `,C' lr�44 ;; On this day perweelly appeared before me BIRTON B. BALDWIN End NANCY BALDWIN 1•. iKw t ..4 i• t, 'r• i to me known to be t tiis',� ' •dt crited in and who executed the within and Inrelott'R inarrunta.t, and ;t;_•,t. .'s.AT acknnwkdged that,`,Y°� �' lbw tame as their free and voluntary act and deed, for the •• ••SI f.�1+: s o � ILL' ✓%i J'o 'tom `' GIVEN uodei zYe` } e� 12Lh day of J4.�•rr.--- 1965. ram: ,' :t•i't•yt. • 6j ,J�k•�44�► Nve�-vwy Pr6lit !w ad Is,sh Stale of Wei ierbe. ..7?4. .-s—::.-..--:', .;-..1.117 :.,-:::'- '''Z;.'-i:',''' ;',;:•:•:itzf'-co.'RD';:-.7zr-.7.'ter'!,, --,:r.....::Zf-1:-'.:- -- - '-i'''' :::'.413 06 S,.,, _-"i L•-.-��3r.^x av,-- -', - 0 i ay, .. a—,1.a• � •i. 1•4.r _ it t I. . I. 4. - .. .,. : ..-,0,. i . ,..,., - ,, ... „ . ...,_.. . , , 1 .., : . . . .., . , „. ... . ,., .....--.-„,. .....Q,.. , ...,. , ,.....p ......,, , • ` VAR 19 8. 3� $ • I • N-.. `. R08ERT A.MOAT0Fi IP^ ' $ \ p t K(NG CC K v - �.. UNTY,fYASH. )ti o GLPU7Y , - \,,t J.- -'' ;rr ,• ro.0 Lea Statutory Warranty Deed - ...1:.,::•. wa:�' -" TILE GRA\TOR WILLIAM VINCENT SMITH, a single man - • (or and in consideration of Five Thousand Five Hundred and No/1O0ths Dollars (55,500.00) • .fs r, in nand paid, conveys and warrants to RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 403; KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON ^',, ., < f a Municipal corporation ;n;,;•;; the followir•--g described real estate,situated in the County of Kin , State of ;a Washington- 9 ^' �' '!sue a. 'K+ he south 132 feet of the north three-fourths of the southwest quarter at- of the northwest quarter of the northeast quarter of section 10. town- ram.- ship 23 north, range 5 east, W.M., in King County, Washington, EXCEPT a,,, ,-?. ;i; the east 30 feet thel eof conveyed to King County for public road by . 1 .• -� I ' ^• -•, - deed recorded under auditor's file No. 3251384. -; :,,; "fir,. — — _ 0 c. I x l� -fir yAx .1,r -I. E 1 j. i:;::-:;a 5 v, !;4 40434; lift anti ..:... :.1.. •r--.__•��Gt...t,i}I�� iara__ e♦ "1`;olOA w.• ot:e) -:E=$*'te • a ,?.-- �( • r 1 L�.ri14J ad! r to•!. �r� s4lls,1114,,IF� • YA.r1.'FS' reryi'sf. ,A 'r£yti. y V. Ir �9vJ•rrYMEAS. s7�"+7;� . :•tli v 9ttbt, J_ zt+-Rn �, K 3 4 re '` e a9Ca SF..... G( [' t:•sr • '�^•.[' ,a• ^': Ot "l).'t s l Itar:.�, .1•�� fib+ 1r!. h i t'z It r -ll_' a ,l i c 3 ;ttt z ' •y g. iF ttd c. 1 —.,. t ,.,. ;,l,4 j'f -+ :-.Pt...-;,. ,rS ' ,e-:7t s'a L•`t `sf it.r a o ` ' � Iet �1 ' •t-!'. 4►1f7• 'h. et_• / a' t o r or •:.: . ' t- :5 ` T . j' f : hS . . • iVne 1 13. Dated this 17th d.'of March, 1965 ,..1:rY KA,. ..-r i.,-.-4e::, 1 'Ys•y•.4Y A:I jf•ttfri.;—; William Vincent Sm,ch -;ti;:,,ur>.:°.' _ : � 1 _t suL) 44, • T STATE OF WASHINGTON, 'r'• ss. irr?h: •., 9t, .0.— Cocmy of King ��%�r On this day(*mortally appeared brio a me IT ,g. r,t •i *Teri •WILLIAM VINCENT SMITH �.`; r . . , . ,;: , l. xw4� ; to tie 1nown to be t•..--1:,- - ihed in and .rho executed the within and foregoing inwrument, and '!•',, .e a N ac.nowledgd) that •a,?r_"•a .e2.•„`'.Al"lama as H,.S free and voluntary act And deed, for the t�,'n', tv r''All ua�e sad pi rpoaos , ' s'.: *. .\p i •4 atict;.�t'.: - GIVEN under fT� �•• - er r�SaaottJri 17th day .=.0 ` ,��.,•h' r. "CLl�. ,,, �". :z of f�o lash.��455. ,. �`�' �" jL +.4'�' =J--=-,r, l•f Nosey !fk au ead Jar Ike State el Waslwgtea • S•''Pr 3TAl6 ,,, waist a1;:_Isegi , s va4b37 n�457 • v ' I • . . T 4. V f' 7� p iii 0 i • r co CA- t _ MTY ,•-N to o 4' LI i • .�• 1 r Z I s .- � _ •• • �r•: es .•,.......„...,.......... ti Foam LSC 1�, Statutory Warranty Deed •' y . ,, j THE GRA\TOR ` EDWARD H. KLEIN and GRACE G. KLEIN, his wife • i for and in consideration of Six Thousand Five Hui:.:red and No/100ths Dollars (S6,500.00) 'tz:; '`- p conveysRENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 403; KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON • w +• n itard aid, and warrants to �. � Municipal corporation ..0...a.....,,GIs the following described real estate,'situated in the County of _ . , .- -._ -Ong'-- _ , State of +'• r• �h+ �� ii'ashington• r The south half of the south half of the southwest quarter of the northwest • .`_ :.4`-'^ti quarter of the northeast quarter of section 10, township 23 north, range 5 �` ' _ ;;,, east, W.M. , in King County, Washington, EXCEPT that portion of the east 30 :; '0 . c\` ' feet thereofconveyed to King County for road under audito 's file No. 3261884. ' s`' •�.4� rti aroma '+y.'„K-•. .T. t t 1Q.\�E\/9�F.S. '4Ql�rsv,i.1�` - -,.•ram ose ` t,� ,. _:r«tN,1:,..• S ♦. '":'�''i C 4 C1t[rt??•' .t'74. IT�1•"4 :.+.6`.et sra�'r l , $ s e • xr It a.-! "' -7L r J`1 tl J I s' 'r. L£ 1 1 �.. •= k_ I- I. !� h".'I ? l 7 a n s �,,a.( ° ,�"' • ,�o d er! s r ,s '�".�-tom ` ' ,.-i-tt �a. `-a �M:,_ M \�' t . S _'• �3 r It S .�.t.5�`^-1�� ' ri"� y ,. / r o yr r y Tar-, F �. `, � r\, - - '-�-' x�• y Y f-A'v .raga i ' i �: 1;�u+sa1D s y•,�xaa :_„•-ew 7aS ...;- t'- •, {:" 3+ (lt'UifE "tl�S ma�y�,!! .4 ""t' .V . t7 •'•• .}" .•�:�. •�(!«�. tY} ,♦eS: .14:i.e.,' t l �T �.,A./.!A`• t A° No. c�, �,�� '''R • a 1. - 1 -f c. r P„ u,.•T. • era r< ' •-LL.,.,•54t� ' IJ:. r .C1. `a t••.t r 1 M. y•/11• 'I: "s i tiy. ` A:4 »_ '41 •" -1 Dated this ;8th day of ( arch, 1965 w.. . ' •i r 1 (H ^~ (sr.m.) et 1.R: Fdwar 4�K Ji.I\ h• I X ` /�, ." • isr"f ••,s. _:. ;;: ?yam'�5t0n r•" ',r''• Gr eyla. KT"C1 facA�) • .„-.. xt.;. ,I` :Sr.., tT T`#z i�. IAASHINCTON, =':" - -••`4fr. • '* uC\l ' ' •( SS. :T;'' . ••€ountj"$t• King `J r'`'' /''•'i, ,• ,'6A this day persormlly appeared before me EDWARD H. KLEINand RA•,'_,,,-:-..-,,,,,,, r C►•1. 1 GRACE G. KLEIN ,; "r ''1a me kndtt w n be the indiv;duri s described in nai who eteeutec' the within and foregoing ieatn meat, and A..• + rw d the ackwkdged that they "gnee same as their free and voluntary act and deed, for the 1f ~� `' uvca and pur,rxa the:eirs rn:r,tioned. ".i s m•,•+o ' GI I.EN under my hind and oirkial . tnia 18 t h do of 1 ''e � /March, 65. . **- f/ 4� + c_ \ s 1' - _ _ J ���,'t�� \(•'�nr� AOlosp PU�t i,sod Joe lkf Si.:A Of Witkfa $.a. Y -,� V J ` t f t.;1040rrjx. # .t r' +7r.•-- :' . . • - f �•. �C-:. '�-^ Z, u by �Gp y Tat a is r 7,F•`� t z� -i- r M: 3•` �•'r ••T• 5 ` '�4-y.• -�1 .'?„_ . ., I Fes' ' 1I �. ! • .: m - p t, ' RCCOke r _6. Q 1 Z ;' . i t. A y�L • Z:r C • • 0..,1.. (2:., . ...I.,. ill.;'.1...... ..'1...., ::: -1.:-.. ..-•'• • Pl. t i ..•�•,1 U L I•� ,F' r�,"j it 1 =•I - -••• • II. ICU r. :.\..1 _--_•• 1 g - �' y it o w ( '* • .:' • 2• 'r ! F • YI it ? i ; • - • '•! • . Statutory Warranty Deed _ TIIF GRANTOR JUL IUS'WEBER, a widower ' " '- !ur Ind in ornsideration of Two Thousand Five Hundred and No/100ths Dollars 1'52,500.00) r.- • RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 403; KING COUNTY, .•::H't;G'fl;., - In hand paid,conveys and warrants to ;ti'. a Municipal corporation • e follnwi";, described Tea! estate.s:tuated in the('uunry ui Ki no . Stat. •.. `'; t (1 a hint tun• I �^._a +` Pie west 150 feet of the south 132 feet of the east 330 feet of ter• rtc-r-l-:,i'- : -,,• quarter of the northwest quarter of the northeast,quarter of sec!.i s • i , :c'.•_r,- '`•` r ship 23 north, range 5 east, W'.I' ,-in King County, Washington. ir .u� - Yf .,� 1+7-'\ `it i,; /\\ •-.t ter • Pt .�"w::nwwri HAIlw 1I* ^�•y'`• •�..{rat i-� {. .. i j t:• •w,•.�v- '. \ -ram 41 I •7;..q.. r Aocu.rj Tin► OOCYAfMi st` \,%l` /-� -.. • ;• ic,..) . ii! • :-.. 1 IlET:i. cr-4 I t: • � uatedthi; 3Oth day of March, 1't_55 .. • .}i"7•►•7. •Julius Weber STATE OF' WASHINGTON, i - • :- -:: '�: •53. (. .t".1 uay of• , .•t Xing • 1 • • .. • On this day bvrsnnally appeared before me JUL IUS WEBER -` to me-known to be the individual described.inand.who executed the within and fnrrg„ing intrument, and 1 acknowledged that �`` ...a„• signed the same as HIS -free and voluntary act and deed, (or the ,:`'- '- uses and purtirp���tNtr2iQ 9TehUoned. j • • :• ' GIVF-141ider xvth:A�q-3 Official xa1 this ',Tt7 •`=1 day of t i c 5 / —��T •1 V • .t',o� ) r� .l Notary Public in and for the Slate of Wasiinglon, •,• "'`; J,ti,�•�uQ j �, residing a,. . s. .•4il, •s J .h `,� 3•, 7 sc. - '+,. mow.*.;a• +titI 4 • ...a k, r. Y""+'!1`I' y,`' sly . ,.; ;p; , }jam* ^g : s• s• .. rf s- K rtt ' `• _ r A '-.t,... 4*t'3 •. . S 4 ! ,. KING _ ' ; '=� � � , :Any LaU'Di?(: '.t•,.. I j_ ( g t-'�.. in •U tom.CEP iTy .i y I i cy i ,•f• roar L3a. •rrr_ 1p .... �t Claim Devi ,,,,• 74;, - -� THE GRANTOR EDWARD HUBERT KLEIN and GRACE GERTRUDE KLEIN, his wife ; rT • . 1 `•' who acquired title as Edward Hubert Kirin and Grace Gertrude Hornung , both ' 'r single pper.sQns ,at date of acquiring trtle end now married to one anotner. T.. ,: fbe and'in conatdersuon of •ra;: ; S1 .00 . . One and No/100ths Dollar• . conveyaadottitclainttoRENTON SC-HOOL DIS1RICT NO. 403, KING COUNTY , WASHINGTON a Municipal corporation. •� '`t :h�!ollowi;described rral eeta'e.situated to the County of � .�`6�1; 4 y Ring ; •lit State of Washington including any interest therein which grantor may hereafter acquire: it:...i 'ix bra .., The north 30 feet of the east half of the east half of the south •_._. half of the northeast quarter of the northwest quarter of section IG. ~ k� Y3; ,.ownsnip• c:3 north, range 5 east, W.M• . - King County, Washington . _ -+F .s gtor _ tom'• �J, s 4)::: r..... ..,. r'_....•/. #' 1• ►' ��~'Ism► v �'��. a 5;.'" 1 I -..4,41:4.0,: . 1...."'W 1:::• !... ;...:.: J v 1 z-kj../.2ttt� h cy r ,. •r r .7. •..!_.r.4. y Dates this 5th day of June, 1 9 G 5 ,%:.--,.1� ..Ft. 'irkM- �.tLcV' t -,ram i4-1,.tny,:h1� / C •V GAL \ -•`;!V:.;.,t . r KK (Sir .S•< "'EdNara hube t Tetn *`►•.. :h;t_ •:t • •M y .4,7 race G tr rude K e r n :.lt• '•^r' •1' t STATE OF. WASHING,T. 7.,• tt•... i.. :& t . i County of K I •Iq `i ,t•>• On.thla day personally appiared before the E D' A R D HUBERT K L E I N and GRACE C E R T R U r E K L E I i, s. �{ %:;' .MU Ito,tt)t.4M�rtt !o be the individual S described In and who arvtel the within end foregoing imtrurr>lnt, and .• seh+bylUdlred fat they a;�+ed the twine u their late�etl voluntary act and deed, for the 'el1 .a N'.�: i,-`"%i _therein me itlon:d• ta.; ;'•:•c•t: rt:.�'• .. . p (�IEh;Dade.my hand Ind official tra!lhi, 5 - d,t e�t e. �7G- ••ti 5 rills • •' hr`k O� i'iit,� Notary Pish is.+�e�for IA*Sits a u stow, -. IF A d Lop...wr -•�....... /jam,/ :. yR,•..: • • `.-q-r.� • � v.w-ate_ iI` . T ; ,- - {7`L .74.V.41, 4 --�._t•c.-_ -_. } .1.4.. _ l,y +r.::.e: -' ',i,1r --�s%c» •?,•j"'.�r. '`':a -V r r •. ^^ �'u',�,.,,t4^c•rt ..: .r;'!3,;r4f• ••,.?7. ;'=+Atoi. - - �9�" �' .tom_ _ •i �;c_• -4, .�: ►+ ,. y i.- st-.._.i;":"z s i'#•! :3 4 e )�� rw 4 3 '''' x .,..,„..../.... ... ,, ,"v',..� :pit" .K.-14-,:-ha..:, s`1'T� .eic•+v o' =' :"�'"r_'.- . v'_r"rF ` d - • r �'" "r'+.%i.t,, t! l r�. •T°�..Y.�y-4,�.`'° '4 ts'. ti-..r' sfr tlw''Yt7. w:a -n . llt 'i�- �,sa'` -tt' �n�i.T$3,' 'T�' ��bI N POR KING COUNTY p � i-' ' .rat ' . w - r 1 Y _ , .F"u :1 e;-• ice' s.. N'.v ri[ ` •. L• ' RmQTarSCHOOO 1 DIS.TRII+CT;AO'•L 443*y*`• !': fil;l. .. -•:+.c•): :,corporation, (Pf,,,"P'^^�jjjllllll Petitioner-Plaintiff, ..,„ i , _ xo. 642597 VS SJ o EARL C. BAYSINOER and ELLA LARUE •.i" c., 3AYSIK3R, his wife, JUDOI'2r.NT-ON VERDICT _ WATER DISTRICT NO. 90, AND - i. :.. ; • ,` : x, PUGET SOUND POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY, DECREE OF APPROPRIATION UNKNOWN HEIRS AND DEVISEES, if any, of any persona interested in the tz; • parcel, if deceased; and a 1 -`FK_. ` t UNKNOWN PERSONS, if any, owners of : : • y claimants, r-- L "`- `'I respondents-Defendants. �' II 3: .mac! ' i �` ( THIS MATTER having come on regularly for trial on the:Inter and- K-0. ,1;r. 1ytn da a of November 1 b before the undersi-ned g;r Y 9 5 �. judge o��`zhe • ;••r~!' O '` above-entitled court, sittingwithout a jury, ` ., -%!: J �, for the matter oi�' '' determining the Just compensation for the taking of the hereinafter -"''- described real property; the petitioner-plaintiff, Renton School -' vi.r i .r•., a4'( District No. 403 (King County), a municipal corporation, appearing "4_ c,.,- cS_ \ �\ by and through Charles 0. Carroll, Prosecuting Attorney for King : c� ' i _ County, and his deputy, Richard M. Ishikawa, and respondents- ;• ' • defendants, Earl C. Baysinger and Ella LaRue 3aysinge:, hi3 wife , a'_ r appearing by and through James V. Abbott, Attorney at Law; and it ` ;��5 ; - appearing that the respondent-defendant, Puget Sound Power and LightP14 '''' tit... ) Company having appeared in this action and filed a disclaimer of f - \ interest in this matter; and it further appearing that the respordent- Y.•r 1 - - = defendant, Water District No. 90 having appeared in this action; and - ,¢ Ms,, - y, w it further appearing respondents-defendants, Unknown Heirs and l W IN -,,,;. ........,:re.,... . •••I-: '_'- S . YJ..�.--w- .-r -. 1?- \f rr:': ..:.... .".�Y�y_!. yj':� �.L+ .4is�r�.#ys' -,+ l �1; z r� Y•.S� ��:n.Y �J�;1 n P ��},-•' �.tt E.a' °(rt�vF'ti'.'t••,,.� i�� •��1�.. '. ►" r^i cy •„...,'• ->_.:•w, _ `�.. •4i M.....' q ,t<�•ig v .was " t "_— T. T L. t'^s'�'t.r-• i'. if tiTi• .� Q.",-�� :- ( ,.;or1 rt,W',"• '•►S z.. -'• >• •V. t� r'•'•*"'' +Y tf_..,�`,.re"t���{ qw�n} f� ym ?-�.t,t.r pe,t�.• Y ;0 y't>-�' , h y ,tC ,'�r,y .p 1-.c + r.a—f� � 9. ` �Jd+�Grf1K ,. .!+ ...• 2. -..•• W: ti„,+:"` 7 •• if f-1i '+t'`1s+�S,,-Th _.. 4 ; 5c3$)!` w •" r',1 �.,y 1• _ `_ Devisees and Unknown Persona baying been duly served in the manner `Y- '�+ provided by statute and having failed to appear and being wholly w.. ilk '•'.'-.+' 7 in default; and the court having heard the testimony snd considered Iffil • ;,i' in the evidence introduced and being fully advised in the premises and • ;3 having rendered its verdict of $12,500.00 as the just compensation r`- • r'�l for the taking of the hereinafter described real property, -....f �sy, ,� NOW, THF.P.BPORE, 4v:,•,' IT IS Hr BY ORDERED, ADJUJDOED AND DECREED that tne respondents- Mt defendants, Unknown Heirs and Devisees and Unknown Persons have no - = .E:yy .=, i right, title or interest in the herinafter described real property. }t.'_ ...;.lam. , . - '� j; IT. IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the respondents- , s defendants, 'earl C. 3aysinger and Ella LaRue Baysirger, his wife, "��•V.-�,. 4 have and recover judgment in tne amount of Twelve Thousand Five y 1; ,�' :- Hundred Dollars ( $12,500,00) as just compensation for the taking, o.. 4C ,:; =:: the hereinafter described real property together with the bui1ain-s y4%= F Y g- c- Ir, i wart, '� _`I • J.ocate.. thereon:- :»- 4 ' � The north three-quarters of the scutnwest quarter of Y h; «,: the northwest quarter of the northeast quarter of ;;.,(r1.'- - F" i section 10, township 23 north, range 5 east, ..M. , ;:. ; "tea _n Kin County, Washington; EXCEPT the east 3c' feet as, g gEl cor.vey;d to King County for road by deed recorded . .� under !ditor 's file No. 3261384; and EXCEPT the �•. ;; y_ ett south 264 feet; and EXCEPT the east 90 feet of the �=' 1'4'" west 160 feet of the south half of that portion, of 1 said north three-quarters lying north of said south *r r�`1 264 feet. rI4.7 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the foregoing �'..,-z..-, r. award provided for herein is made subject to the payment of an, » a .. taxes, assessments and liens due and against said real property p'i:pr -.•• :• to tne entry of tnis judgment and decree of appropriation, and the L_•4* i. ^lerk of the Court _s a,ithorizec' to retain same from the award to de �` - 1 • '' paid to said respondents-defendants, Earl C. 3aysinger and Ella •, r . LaRue 3aysinger, his wife. z 1, .s -2- et' l • - s fat J'J �r. i1 1 w• tt: ._. _,_-_...._....-ems..:cr craft—aNrev -wi r 1: _ -+ : ,s''X. �'. a •. S .-z r,•-a e � S 0 t `,_ z , t 0; : itil'''�• k a -.=_ Z4:4 •: Syr-$!,V•7E'. yam - ., £ a .. 4 . i � ^Ti? df`st `` _' - ,•e • ` l tea'-i4t1.1 r , i.q,i syt - •J � -. y .. "-"ti.F`t �Y-.i�o�1! lc�A`�..)' Vs ;'w6�tr•�� �t¢F1� 1 • '- � 't, r`• " r . riCs e � i{ h jw _ 'ti• ey •, Y.r _ * . �¢ - . , � ,,J •1-: • 0,71, - �?`�5n t..A C�►GL y z�.fit ` . •.<Vt.-u.-JZ31'-, 0, i•�J} .- ;a11..,.• `y..t"• •�is r u - '.'r.�r� yam' _f, t3C �l i�i."�y • ,�,i ,� Q . y f -••x.may- .F. 1 y- ry -i . t� r 4, 4l' i 3'.i,,f{ .g LM. •:, . Icy ra` 4' ttr x, • . - ,.T`:1,4 T i, IT ''l• �.•• ,,.r that u n payment �D1�DQBD A�dD� D Po rfiA of the-S- fpovided for:.above_ to the-^terk ..f the Court, the title J4 and possession of-the aforementioned described real property situate • .-.. - -'_tea: '_ - in King County {iaahi ton with the located "`' � n3 n8 togetherbuildings Lr? thereon, be and hereby is vested in the petitioner-plaintiff and said • ' - petitioner-plaintiff is owner in fee simple of same and may at all .:.':.: I.. :• .., times thereafter use and possess said real property as against all _ 14..,;, parties known and unknown. _ ;' - +t_tl IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that upon payment of .SZ:: tiF. said award into the registry of this court, the Clerk thereof be and !:: is hereby directed to satisfy said judgment and to hold said award ., J Y4- for distribution to respondents-defendants, Earl C. yaysinger and �•' Ella LaRue 3aysinger,, his wife, subject to the payment. of any taxes, "' ... ,:t . assessments ar.c liens due and against the aforementioned. real :-- .�• ' : R, x •4N I �` -t. iX property by further order of cnis court. ...,-, '^,,' `.'°�1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, AD UDGED AND DECThEED that respondents- -rA _`A., defendants, 'Earl C. 3aysinger and Ella LaRu.: 3Qysinger, his wife, ;;•• j- • recover ?" . i recover their costs and disbursements herein to be taxed. •r;;�;:;. ..,, DONE IN OPEN COURT this 7 -- day of December, 1965 "`' ' :. ' tr: : .,:ante:. by : •r s—,.-:. t..•• _._::,,-tD M. 1Sn'IKAA .-. & -. ,.w.t D,:puty Prosecuting Attorney for King County jl•-,'C '- i ttorney for Petitioner-Plaintiff .' ..lit' ,'r:_-g.,:,;- Approved as • Form and Notice of Presentation Waived': 0,=' w'4(2-iVnits / 4Thi ! ' lit..... I A"•:; dbTT :,,.,,�'is T ' yyy�r::c..ji-•f or ResponJent-s-;. fCil--dam-�J ✓ay sinpeZ' ;;�.•• ��" F.. Approved as to Fors and Notice of Presentation Waived ; • T r=•" w c- / 0, !' n'vr LJG G. nOD.! ''#i is 3rIZhtr:ran, Holm, Bereiter and Stone '; cr-= :`f, Attorneys for Respondent-Defendant Water district No. 90 ..464,?`,- •�..;e r•� . ji eS -3- r / ( • kiit as / ra4.j.rC:.% t� fii jl s.t.;` :. � ti1L$1 alk � "�"st`y� A ..��. - I, .. 1 �r;�• ,r ' q. ,,. rj. S .� � .t ' '1'•.� ;J{: t.' .kl. •lj., .yi �:,�• t , ,i. � W itib'� 2i�• .FI•4•.• 1+. •i�Y ., �. ••+";'', ;, •77 O. .•.�tr 1�t f5:.' r t ! ?f r •r. t !• w { "" .: -..; 4 .d'i1a••,i.L i7' t•1i7'. • .•..•::..s •'1.1?..k i!,•is?,-__ 'i • . , ' .,k / 'alC;GSt'. N gill F 1.r + v vA te'atS'i 4y.ji'• • Qm , L Tr la y l`.�.r, rif• .l Id �. \ •cis ;�� ado o,9r ! 4, ,'_ r. t� � I: t., tt \P,All"--Ce\, 1%41* 1- • :cc 7l 4-Ay1� Q N‘,..-.C1`‘e,°.* ;l i1-k- `` `r 'c+r 1 `,� j:ft*" k44'i.y.1.:'0'— '-., `J•Z IY,��+L ttqq 16 1..1 et: .1.! '" 41-„e,..-IN lk%n • '• .,,4,1, ...-4.` ••• •• t•u.A • /, ' ' 0 . 111Z,.:\ e.., .,v'i \ • 1E., --A. - A • ‘., .• " k...N. ' 4 .::.':.:;.,,;'- tv,t.•':.'• ..0,.. • ''• • �k Q:�2 .,� • mow' � .1:.r• 'fi, % - /I. ' • -Ira kiti , -,,,,...?.... v :4,...„,!),,,.:,..40. Is, . i ‘, 1)1 ,...._. /. .,,.. . g.... • :,.'.. .....,,,:tt.. ;t q ' ,- cczu , S-6- 330 t.', i •�..t:y4�NyZ, .�ti.t 1 i i;tt •„'�VV'". i�si ti},1 .r .;. 'qu ir .' - Z,i.^ . i �:I• :( , • )` wt• S•Jt` o et•._i,i 11 T .S. i t,' t nr,.:t {,., t, J f, :'r'1'*' f'' r• '1. .f.,, ft., 't •••if ! r. t;i •.•t i'. % 1 .7y.%` ..�: P,i i " :i.1^r , :14.% ►!� ,,�/f;/i t, :rlt.;..:01k•• r �R !1 •.r 4 yy�'44.4.7. 41:'.r.' 4 .1. ji:t.7 ! j�?i5^t;r' " .�...r:1' �':• :.• r. ;i .;'�: ",s: • •. . .rf1 1 ,•t. .� . .. ..r#, •!1.•4: Sti ��i,��'`. rr�' ,+tf� C '�.i I,':'... r•s:. .� , � •l14y. .i:.�..i r:,�( 'r•'•i li.a„'4'•,f"y... a•:, q.... ` ,•r • !I • .. ..i., rY. `4 M1 rat. • ram. .,k.i 0• s r. 620 43 :,....,. *� \ 4 p 585 . -- tj ill .. ........ ___ ._ . ., . .,_. . C1 REC t a, \ • Q VOL : IF9b2 I;�¢a 0a i PAGE.. REGUEST OF '8 .. ! t` 11 ;p, - , .... �,f•, ,.1 `�.i 8 30 0 z z 8 , 1 . i ,.. r sl o I i . • C i , • a�7E r'<u ` g 1 I I Cr)• •� � AGucli r 4NT t",siS AUDITOR F-� t f,p Y O ( Z • '�7 KIN Y MASH ^^ . - ( c:i;.. 0 ►.. . - DEPUTY h'�'l d r9 J h I UESTOF - - - rJR RECORD AT REQ FILED AT'L.TITLE INS.CO. PIONEER 9 SECOND AVE. � CO... LSE _' SEATTLE.WASMIK.TON 9Statutory Warranty Deed -: Q' 1. jr. 1 THE GRANTOR JULIUS WEBER, as his separate estate, for and in c.•n••drratinn+.t Five Thousand Five Hundred ($5,500) Dollars RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 403, KING COUNTY , s ' in hand {,.lid.conveys and warrants to WASHINGTON, a Municipal corporation, the I,lit wing described real r•tatr,situated in the County of K i ng , State of ''•-'-`- Wa•hint;tnn 's'wlI- 1 . The east 180 feet of the south 132 feet of the east 330 feet of . - the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter of the northeast Ali quarter of section 10, township 23 north, range 5 east, W.M. , in King County, Washington; EXCEPT the oast 30 feet conveyed to King - County for road by d^,d recorded under auditor's file No. 3262476. Subject to easements , restrictions and reservations of r:cord. J • N8 r•r . -- to nn I1` I• o 'r T -_ . , .11• l � l+:+trdt�o: 24th �lay .,f July, 1967 •:...I. • Julius Weber t.►.,tt . •I \l i t li N•\�111\t:I+'\, / • ` .' • ' . , :..nt•. ..t' KInn 1.. ?',. r �. - - ., ++n 1ht•M., Iwt...n.dk .gq.eatell ht•t..tr mr Julies Weber • ...' r.•r .• ',: i,r( - • t.. rgq:VfoMo t,. h.. Ow n..tn:dral drv:dn•d m And %:.o .. .nit' the within and furrq..mg rnxtrnmrnt .end - • f .z= . _Y at}nnw*,,�j;ad�E:+.:e he Knrd the wn+r a, h i S frre and voluntary act and deed, for the Q; • a:: u•R.11'1�+Ir Lrgr. 1!u•1ra+ er ul,..nrd e. ,:;<�«g tavI.fr n'lrt n+, h.uul,soul ai,tw1.r.tl this ..1 •y . la,' •.f / �' /, • '•' • \fury Prhbr to and for Ike State o/ 11'arhlajtaa. .- +°~ +• reziriiat at /a '1 •. - '' v d II a�r++''LLJJ �i.� , --- - _.� ►__.... ..- .:•..... •. ...,.._ . - • •its _ -�.-,..< • . • s'1a a anent Oct 23, 18"9:351 LJ 12b48:3'J .tp ,ii la '}e a ni e W :►o rri ck and hi o • 2lrArias t' Kittle 1i !.arrick , of C of ___•, of ht nesota -. ... . �. o (ii.a ogo, Ui lwaukee a >t . Paul hai lwby ':omparty r.. a corp o " tho. a of 7.isconsin p 4o t.rr thetnaclvoo i,nd for their h r' ar'd lean/ rap, hby cony fro r p for th', sum of wI !'r. t }.c fright to erect e.cd mnir:tA1r. r.n :.lec Tra .oii aril. on -yet Am %try, alq And >t; the flg Igoe ri1s.11 prop sit :in ISN ;)t i-t- and 1.1,.gk 3f T11 both in :.ee 1. Tp 23 N 3f 5 -716 the cent in of ad t rnvnsmi a,i on system to be par to and 28 ft 3 of *Ole 1. ln or s 1 aka le Jd oS°Quo of 4 poles: and- -tam Jna(' trolley and trrnsm wires, anchors jam: guye ' :, r)ri thrk right to cl,! ,r trees from endanger;ing the 1.n ' !th.s ; e mg 4 anchors ` , `o '° Cer, f rerrio'•( XI . - ti :vyyt i ck 1:1 a:• kotter) ■e • or; i 3 by C orbs s;erri ck and his w i.i tti erri ck bet srke Oo')dtvin ?i rJ. and t' tiowor )inn r9s = t ' ust in, 1ii nn .:tlr.r' 1 , -' i ,1 by ;; rents A y..::i 1 .'.;.r inma ,act C 1. I 7't 2 ,1 F3 .! : 4. 12 5 4 i:213 .rep ; 7, 16 ,2,0r1 t And ')VC 11oi .1:'ook r rid t; 'rncr 1193. .kooi; ie of Jl..Ey::1orri , jr110 1 , rust :7 off'rj 2 r.n r C c to t= ...Si r l l ''t in t h e. f 1 S7, i•;j v r ,. 7 rtri 1:'1 Boston .;omp:any ' '= t'111t cat r.�t n 7 ; p,1rt f' Ftt No ", :aul UUalbr,mk • r ee fbi t;rcc,k ,1 b CI ri o o :t 1L- r; Po, 1�}iol brook hrtd ';r71 co _ r 4 lhrook 1 t J i �Yl'ie;l � i I . .,,; .1" r e X hn:rlor� .Ar 16, 21 ... id L./ : r;• r 1 .:.( i 1 .1 h o..lourni l 11:_ kite .:1 i 47 _• ;K'i :c!_ ,• ..yi A ♦G Yi. 1aT. v• . .>. ) s:�� - �,,.'' r• riAS �s BS Nov 1 -- '. 5� � � recur dings.; ��'�bo3%� Jul 27-55 $lo, ov i (Tax pd 20044.3,,) . • (NOTED ONLY) Chicago, Milwaui:eel St. Paul and z?aoitic .railroad Qo Par' , a Wis onsin carp 311C in int to Chit:ago, Nilw&ukee SD. ?au1 i Roi ay Compuuy to ?Suet 3our,i ?corer X 1,1 t Co 'pan , a Maas corp Yp sell5 del cy arj qc to sp all or the stor3 rt ti and int in and to r11,3 r 1 006 re and pencil prop boo in he,, L'arc:y.1 Dext or t:if rt or way used by tor ror the :naintec.anew and operati.cn cr gvox's 110 KV elect trans :,.ne supplying elect power ror the operation or the rly 11118, n3 of t le rt�;, ©�C', d • ; E- £; at ',he rack: zit the it cxua1rn e r•'a1J. ; L)72.tatien t` 'uget :►out: ror i'34 cwui $ ZLx �ht C iii the NE4 o4 r -t;. i.;ii in a 1:eY3e;a --j 'v,i'j" d ii' over, a rxi across: ni_ �i; �t.�'�v . t - 3' J •�- r11/ ='�1'✓ � 3 "� Cu1:li 3► Tp Cif - 1 ; s _ • ri (1Gt,,c; 7 ; ,,22;_; !' ._' - t � x r:'.. �'p Z-`i to a _ J61S: i4l' r t. :''- at': L;o:.iCi(:! •' V+er LLg it ;;o :•ie:,r x ,., .. A SeG P% 'rfl. tn tne w3rF. l poles , anchors , ,Er�L 3 and ;)',ter a—s . � r t[ie 116 c an :. l.ii 1oti: tm tht part ..gi rt Y.!?1,!r_ • ��. y ' f •ti4 •r _„ �3r rt, ..r ail• e,a r �...Y �. � A",W4. • 'Mr-4 �,,r =r�`.,.i r.«�.y,h." Af <.' " � r:;frI< i{, d,•` k: '[�L•i. r A.._• J.A 1 `�' •r,g r :4-'.tj:n�. {9 a ; • s.: fit,:r J•'." i L ;t . ••i••t yr•.r r •.I' r. •t•. t. - rd.:::�Yr y 'it!Iv y M ..!!•y�...r::•:: r i`-!'`• .i V.-::Y`�y..L• .; •�">s.. '.y. •f: ,.d' .r4 :�. •.;. ,,i:r ar'in.,S4,:e. •;;A.-!,•4:1 ' P'74!•!^Ai'<f.,-L!� .tfv f w'rl;i•ri,t tv. :.-•..*:;:: ..*..:1:�7-ff l' =••'a- �r -cam �� yr}:.:•' # '•- F G'•.:".v.`:.�g{ r, -:it►�s��••r•0:..r-."-,s%..4,..t_ f. n `•n'•1s' '- r j%« :.s, f..' ,.. �r w '•�• r4 5 7 i.p•..;`�t 4.r''•ys ll.r•,e- '1r 1,;.•"'n!4 h _'k1 . , 1. d,: y-:'s. _ • • ..te r. '2 -f r ":i__., 6, mart 46360342 2 ins(. Parcel El of part or tne rt or way 'used by the sttor tax' tne maintenaroe • and :operation or gto 's 110 FV elect trans t line supplying elect cower ror the operation or tne rly x trains or gtor d r; Beg at , nut not inc the steel terminal structure lao uporn ;he substation prop or the gtor in 131k 2 Sq:ithere Fifth 4dd to the town or Renton in the S1 t". or SE';, Sec 18-23-5 ;t) In a fierily awly dir over, a1g and across sd iec lb and Sac19 Tp 23-5 a:� Secs 24 €�rd�i ?a Tp 23-4 to a pt on the # ely i.ne or the rr rt cfway owned jol ntly by the gtor and the Oregon-Washington iecaiJ"road ac Navigation r Co and its lea ie9, ti,�ion k �io 1r Co perpendmcular1y I opposite Fail oad Engra Sta 427+u4. 7 t togtnr with wire ,, poles anchors guys and other a appurt of the 110 KV trans line l. cc on tht par ,: e sd rt o way des above , F. Reseruir}; to g tor the steel terminal structure Ioc upon r od substation prop ot" gtoI' o i S1k qx 2 Smlt{lei L,, l'ir t;h Add to T,,Join i Rentun , kcw t4Ctt3ned h o io 11.3t or conveyances , e3.r'lt3, . ik1e1'7:3e3 i':•uncL:iaes , et:; acquired uy rp i-nn ror its elect trans lie betw 2noqualmi0 2a11a nd black River Junction Some wc:t, are rec ahoa inE vole and pages and some nave Eot i •. et=in t:ev, ) t Ci*11 Pli},t4t Sound r'cer & L g,";Z CC) 20' Electric tt Seattle ; CJ1 • :74 ;• �ne.t.. ^at t ± ar . y - t r . ': rr r .�. rr•.:. h x. : ,r + -✓ '•w r t.> w _ gY, ;; yr � r4 Wi r4 4 .. 7 ` / 4ai 1 ' .rt. K JR 4 r �. ki0F _ .(a.,iX-g1n._;! ,tAd� L .:wie•3Y. ,1,41.,JG.. n...:r3! �!' .. w,* a - ,y.._ ••i • !.w .► ,71 '" ; ?.4 . .,-+i . • s ` 'I .art"` ii, Agent % /`' GY achaseatt atimt.te Wio t `r' 14 t Spa .I 4 i� e!► 231,as as f-. 1Ior tad e — ► stAa d"' -V , til **Os? -4,—ey x,250 kits siatearliao at a dBkh This sist it* sr:413W tiiiintittremde 76.1-4 eartaia /mits tit/ Ost 11.042 $* *a tad tta alb istscis ft, t to Cum atom sad rim it t ei 2092. olt cId"pg I7 ast N0 3276495. r!& a:v t or after la des of ter ld 1;13.1417'. SitiUt. i t ..ter. bita, Sci•sre, toc , ' '!: 3i Mtj for au blast Jag ma rel, of aa8 Bats *tricks& iisva Lortguisou tcenv Vsta 34.4.11 kr ?dal IteiTaltgacom Batt Zeamia 2.2s ea, tiw P. .bla aa l`ar aro xso eta is Yob "will Oa ap) Ziat t. ;12.3. 3 54& 'rod 1.4.14body end IiL a 2 .•: . Its I'n a B ae na Zrant — &a Yea ntle.r61 ..-' 6i�J. •1 a� §i of xi GI szik Mt't of 1 or J114I ? ,,a ar 5 tho tauter la .. a;4 t&s r la. Of a+li t st 'T 11;ir 'AIM :t 1 1 2 p' ;f ; 'ivvt for say blaffit{z �$1 ' r ittaly mita st► vi; !zed I..,-body a :3. 3.1tule itabdy ,fiver JO. 10-43 t "rtu . u;?ala s' z, fret a'duard np al; ran tei) s :a Ft 7 Vga. pp) .111.10 2.A74: Ad. 2 34.1164.) 3 245 5 3 1:4 i'u,,get +y sa a $sue � SAAq•r ( c,�1, a. 3 313�cmint; a• ey ® j E ea W •v Kam'► �XS.�. AZ ' VA is .ssO `al-maa in sar aspA ] 5 rt X.4 or 0'i o?' to Pt d,za 'Tp 2 ar 5 atra t4j• )r -- eaar bz'� }l.a ttf ads MA tt, • AJipi' r' v.L'l,t L}t, --- 611 Van a e�� ,Ipj�+..}4's �'slnyag rem iv-L,aetitai:, armt r,tok a go,cala Sat IA a:1014t:1 0 j}� Jul l --4ea3 by ";.Ga.yCis�zt1U� s d tTe `tl,s Ga t , � 7 :4153:rit �. V 1W; np `7db 4 74 3,i W dlt 'f'"" Y r+7t/ '9.iT { ap) r V6 f t d u 19--43 • • .;* -' I.!. - , Esmt Oct . 3.0 5 J 43928 i+ hi Oct 26 53 val con (Non txbi 1909605) Bertha E . Morrill , as her sep est, Alien L .Rush, Jr . and June Y . Rusn, hwf and Virgil M . Gooden and June M . Gooden, hwf and Benjamin E . hrsr:;Ina and Edith M. Eergsma, hwf and A . V. Blackman: a s_ngie man and Louise Marie Donnell to the present and future owners of below des land : . t'p grae. and cy to xpx present and future owners of • s . The l of Sj; of E` of E- of NEI of Noii of sect i0-23 ewm • 1 2,x _pep t ti-he. .N. 30 ft and the S 10 ft throf kcw and the N= of c. _ .. of NE7 of N'ri* of sectl0-23-5 e • n Except 30 ft on the N lei ._ la their s&a the right , prilh1.ege and authority impa.ve repa_r arid maintain an esmt for 10 ft driveway as now constr,�;: ted , located and now in use acros3 , over and upon th,-- � .� land locatedin 4Scw : " '. nt t, e E� of n , f - - E , f ,rE` ,..t' , ,' . .. i'i �: �., t�i 1 ` a) i G 1 L L.'L L 2 lr 1 f 1; `r i j t"I 4 .`4. . : i:. -2 - ewm Except the N L: ft and the S iW ft thro `:y - a:A; and c�, to the present and future owners of the '' S- -of Ed- of E_ of JEi of N'i4 of sect 10-2:5-5 e:vri ... _eot ti-ie N 30 ft and toe S 10 ft hrof and the N of •W.- Ai t on •- . .. i_ ..�f r�r.,,ty� of Nw of sect 1G-2_j `) ewm Except "G `' N in ::ow, the ._r s&a tiie right privilege and authority I ',. P s _mot sy - I __ .`- �• Ty�s+e'S €7; • i+.� a �rS 4 et i s .� :. a; •.,.. Z ♦Y� ��•':irs.+i = (• ..1 M '�y'a�R S �1•.'e�' /'�• -�f.r ;..yam yi `•`3 vN! � •:l, i � �.��a �G.^'s J! 4��FP ; '-JY "y� �- F'�x:�tF ��` ' Y � l/,� "� �+H ft�#�rr � ' `,.}�6 .�i riga ��'f� ,! .�.�f , •1.1"." .fir '"j-,•�.,4..;1214..'."T..:Y4"_.t% •-- etyt{i`'•`"i..n4f.t"..Yr.:.�r-.?.,-..+!:ra., •?s ':,;.:- .'s.=J�H '`;•`siar A.�: :.•X .:.:S!r . .a'- .=.f' N +r6 CIS C-; .-r U X O 4-3 I' 1.: a-.-4 •r1 E-4 r-i CO 0 U .C:n (d '`I nr r r,,) V) r-1 `' ' > ;4 0 I-/ (n tsa 0.• 1 C i:: r) :a. .1, c: �J 'rJ �LL.:. •.--1 3 4- C) I a) i•1 , 4 cl CO (Ti ti-1 •-i •.d Ia . r''- ' .�'1 G) (/ tJ Iq 'U C .C: 'rJ 4-< O '':. N 't S r) a-' '. CV C; S{ (]) 4) 7j s. S-, G1 U I: L� ^ i 4� O 1 4-) :13 .i•.: I; i U r4•1 a) •••-i (1 0 co ... r.. 4 • _ 6-1 U) 4--4 ( tJ .-1 1:5 fi ctj C) 0 .l> co .'i 'C.S 'CO •.•i `r ' r. -_r_-) 0 C) 0 1-) (U CV ;:3 0 r1) tC) 1) C1 CZ (• ti • N r 1 5.4 • t. f) 44 J 6) 'O r-1 '• .. 'i t. :> C . 1 � .s. ;-1 (Ti Z a) Ti U) 0) 1 F-4 CIS . C) c.-1 :• 1;1 •-1 • a) I a) ', Cr-4 C) 4-4 4- (1 4-4 ':) 44 a) --I C c) E 43• •-� C: 0 ,`. (....4 I .G $. 4. rid t0 4';-) ;1 '5 COi 1-) 'rj 4-) •.) !T -P a. ') .O :LI C) 0 5•1 a) .( • O „i:k•.' • �'�^ 11,rU '.. C r-';.t 'i.l .-1 C) :1 C Z, C.1 •.4 13 13 �-•I 1-1 f ci) ,:. .'T1 CTJ a) .(.. ' 5-1 c. CJ 'j '' 0 • i 0 i.„).1i a) •-i 6) ,tom .N 4) U 4-) 1 +-1 C: c1) 1) ;: CA :g .-1 i 3; 4-4 4) O () . C•) 0 .-1 1.) 1.1. 0 : ..O :»r) • 0 r•-1 F-1 4-•1 N ('J a) '. 1' (i) 4-4 1 4-) 14I ITS 0 :'. O fM 07 (1•4 > ,) r«-! i!'J 4 CZ '1) t 1 0 • 4 • C .. .,;(v 0 1 ,1 V Grp i-1 a) i 1 CO C_) ,rxf.'ti C ►:� C') (r.)r-r1*f s O c,-, F, c a) 1) 1.0'0 Sr: ao a) :J •,i.� r-1 'b ci ,}~.. 13 r i O .0 P. ✓ .0 :1 t.7 4- U) r-1 :.: ugh, • •• CZ L (: Z 4-' Z'' .P E '0 -c3 ') ); O :i •--1 1 S`I let -1-) cti O �• C/)P4!4 ,t •r-1 I: •.C-( I 1 CO 0 0 ' r' G/ O 4•-1 1� 4-) ••r:(,J ' 7-1 1,y) •.� a1 ... Ic'... It.,.... �`1 •9 `J •r-1 r~iN. 4) 0 G) ; 4-1 O .1 J �. O .0 > C r•i t►) s; ;r'�. �J a) (/) -I-) J-) ( P. 0 (Ti .0 a) 'L) . , ' E )-) 'CI C')-'i('J J-) 4-I 0 :i r4.4 .1.) :a C3 'O :� a) I�•�'/. co Q) 4•� e) ial 0 r-i >> .') 7 4-I .l.3 CA 0) a) 0' !~ ±.+y),ti `LS c i I-) O C. "C:3 ,- (1 •0 .0 co a) O C 0 tA) �,,.),,` ,-s • :z 0 (t3 a) VC.1 C'Alt C!) •.r-'1 •-. c • ':N J h() j.S a) ii .•i C) 4-1 ;i (ij .-i C) •-.: J C.) 0 (1 'Il 7-4 (1) Cl .11 f`') •r-i :). F•1 (C3 CU .0 U) •0,4 • 0 ?C ,,,1Z a) O > I1 (1) 4 CC) 4-) :i :r. F( 10 •--1 .1) 4 •-+1;V i-) c' •ri ;..1 f) 4-) 54 f: CA 4-) 4.' rr. 'r-1 C CS W) - C 4-1 4-4 4-) 4-) �-4 3) C,. a a.) O O • C.3 .1..) 'b 4- F 0 1 'O > J•) �� 'LJ .0 a) U --4 r. d Q4 () CI) 4-+ C.) 'd Cd '-) ) -1•3 C/) . r •1 i 1 >s'. a) (1 '--1 O P O 0-)--IN : .l.) .:•-4 :"ti CO 4 3 1r: of bi t • F-1 S-I .-I 0 C . f t.1 :;.1 '0 Cr•1 C 71-1 :.0 5.4 ,-1 ;' , 4-) tit C�i - C•Z U) .; U1 .0 ►: F+ C 4 1 ` . C) 'i i 4-) I 5-4 V) . (.-4 •l) CJ 0 C,) 4-) -1 (A •r i .0 0 R. 4, 0 I.. re-I /-• '71 Li) -1 O -1 -1 0 ., X (!) Ci v ci a) '`e•a 0 I).(N.1 4-1 c: _ a) F.( ':, w� •.••+• (1, > ''� t1 j 0t•, O C) C.) 1 :•? '7 )-� ;'J; ) 's0 > :) C) 0 :.4 .) L. 51 .C.: :�0 4) a: '~) CL 0 •i :.n ., ") F C:. ;0 s .i) (1). 0. ti 1) .-.1 .1 C,.. 12' -'. Li "1 C ';44.:;. E= 0 i-1 O,;?' 1:-.).!.-4 •,::: ..-1 :1j i.o : -, E :--r t'1 c. ..-1 . •.-i c 1,' JJ C• C. ;` •)) GI !'.: 'i) ') •73 . C) (1) C.) 1 1) .) 3) • 1 E `U 1 ..) .1) C4? C; C �.tg'ii' -1-) :1 E C'') cr•1 .;.) -i•Cr) 4) r), (:) • ! (-� ..-1 ••1 . . -) C, ;_•r :) "i$ 1 • 1" } ( Osszt. sl) Bvext efasentr aemaisslomsr Ps aahmo - ..w. Atlas% gassall it nasal; t Roboart ! Maras 4 3 naps GlstI Orson i itse ;gl 6 42 by Tem am1UL. A a 3 kehtlps aad''assioll a rloaat, tail duly olvats4 lull?lad sa ouging Qetyg k2 auao ©r , sad moot& stat4d i they we mad to ems el gust ky manor nor sst tocritof a om email*? two sal el a fs4 is t&s Mel slat sd la 4 IdI Aizsm AmsAt pp Vuessai 2s2$X Lo3►asmd t t . r 19 4)r E A::s +t 1n °epyar' I®aln 6454) 41 . DDept1 3261 a pt 1 42 41* i ati3s ,� 1 — card 11 N1si.a a )e b . . ' to Couatyof Itmatato of V ag Sp ors, rela, and is is op ?r3 sae of thavtiblla ?arovar as a Ili' t road sat higtuay ail Latiang se a Tan$ 30ft o SW at Asa o?4the314,sadtaa n)0ft of Uzi, € NWA oftta3 i of t ail is see 10 T. 2j {$ 5 *us, aea g 0.12 sstsrs3 al, ss/ clia use Rd* ft tisx right to .maga nas 4104a fez auto aadfills apattektuttiagptforad as es aEsilaarss dos right otn y Zdward ! hem kol, 3420 1 42 by zdvar4 3 Kloia 4o lig Aadars p arm alto(i �flt 2) 44 f a. ig F ➢ 3t Sept 1 42 j i > 3261115 •gee 2t 40 4111. 41.10 IrsamAt1.e3 Serasl D Lesley a vidmsz ooaio solo aza asp ptyas , esa% to .14 D Vilosi ttud Ethsi ai446 Wilms ate! 1 ?p ayn sad va rs to Wig 1'1! aliiaXr 4,410; 3r atiazusWis aillarost Villa Traata0vol IN pletspg 64, rams a;; seq. ea i 112.844 i4 atodt andcas la a ettidassral .z r_ss C!oa or rssi s a% *oat bat grant ar emdgramtass ala dtd like a; d t ha:,swan t* WI,' duos on lahxmtga imitiii®cr a: asitisoetIdasik C rfacoma, T0413011§3 n La Lila ;: ;rg &t *PI=0 x& a rant*** aJ 351.Mc er.A4greatco ray Fic-aai D U ++io, --n.a a ;?ty 4Q Jy bioroel D tisioley 3 vldouar as 4 901.0 artd�ap ptia;u1 est bf uJ3?rardi_ Haat ydp sss ats(NSaat 9 42) ai 39 3d®a crept ot; ai X b ldg lam • 'fieZ( 100ftc Zot :17 and 5 .1110itof ) Xas Half of Lot a� a1 in WI 12 2icwouroco. lsaSk* ac(vaz to y14).ti L1 :.ee i it yo1 2_2 tfpita pus 73rd t oe ads rel+in ~& ,b1im Ivor, 1.ug a$ 19420 by 'tale 2i3: , be T. ?roula nr" la for sus if r s ail a (.. a) Jun 2 M4 2 0 r D' Sep 3 1942 32t2475 Ai 2i 1942 310 (no stra411 art ) ilobert Aihaeon and Inert& Zoharon, 1.uf a d Victoria 1igabath ~t CaveattOs And: Gisaa WaPoicylietlranalt41.1, her has So Ma et recut ithasims s_ sia fp ey and q e fig des reati is coxictisi or Tang taxi Piero at of am Xa s 6 sad 7, b3 oeh , D nn? a; Mshlv.4 Prk Addition to the e of a, ksw (The sink of NV, of Sec. e g 19 N R 6 E. ?n Piero* . ) 20 to rt Johnson Ingrid Zokasoa Vie t e ria ilizcZetb Oa.®araugh Olean wealey Cevanalagh Ezies at law GT Toe Deceased katm. AM 25 , by £rob'rt Zdhn3on sad /Agrtd 3c1Jls irf, an+d Victoria Mliza at C;allaaaaell ant Glean ;:shy Cavatutugh, hJr hus, bat 4411a B.s12ekcir, np la and f .r at 't >.a r¢a $ 3 (az ) ;'377 29 19b3 YLS by b Zsbzacia, 4421 7oataaelle o i ti 2 elf, 2,42t 3q i9h,2 i,+ (11.0 311:x1 / atfiz el) +��� If�A �}} p, �f to (.!oz my �� : :'.A t o9 ::Fa tIm a fp 37s4 rola, and go to s-;.= fir uao c):' tit 9at.i -o farlylr as ; rublie • and gat is f rA The &mit 3c. 4 ttt cf tb.J c `rw; 'he 7.T34 of 100 T. 23 1494 . 3 ! +eta , oUni:id.&a':g 0,22 &ore tim to .e ace 3iop4s for out z and ;1116 upae abutttrIg rpt v.Jb ea ti4e or °.de iristt uf Ira i cp r �K API., 3 19420 tr Mrs welter, bar Pt. C . Anderson, nr 'a far st of vtzt rea at s (ne) . 23 1944 s 1.4 by J. R. Wit: Oltunt7 :: .d F 5iv.var - -'. , . of ass 9 tip ;3 ,a. sir . al. to_ de is iz1-';04' j_.- sst 30 :ta if e gel *It':•Uts's-ateetere,.x ;g,t:,' ttti. ssi ),nth a natrstted to be e. p .: to the ea tessi:-:Irt'2b+e::,* ,aside it' 1ecd Ade H ire41oy so nils, i as- :,If the mid Ada;Bt Bzsd3,o t wo --1.1ef., sal hest exed thee oyanse ia. pay suaM e of a4T tsrit • Thi, eyan a is a nd eat delVd to the ail a pt ua4ez t. .lv tilth.ty f ., ,r, end. is sead i� -wit*: , toted of s- eta:'ti- 0 + ntbzg- 'admr•to:.: - oy re est erle duly. si&nu+d. + z4 :to taii + atote of . Ads I Bradley. deed being probate Gauss. So 93 it Vas suprrt of the s :,: 4 - ;orke On rug191 ' ` Tkis dust d is gites bt-asn trr eit is ae2epted bar the grtees in xe a flan. ilia t►h,M s !kr ait za .eler dont us"- sd Malt 2rodley . es aaeller, sn-t t t. Ad grtilet. .as parchrs 4td° oh. oe, eboub •`est 27 1937 This deed in /40an Dy"greaior en id seoepted- by the 6rtee, ss o ell taxes end Dees* vah under the te,ras gird *oat a-re to be pd by grt*S,, and aub3_ to 84. siitAili It any plseed upon the rt pty bar tbru or under t yea"44 it,ztetto o7t-iti t of t� oleo eau ea by tared or under t,-.e 444' grantorsnd not othebsa vs d ?stern Westait as, pdar of tte est of Ads is radtey. daaed • keuAug )9 19242, try Letters X 7.estern es sitar or tie out o; Ada Bradley deed , bet Faui Dubaer a ; for Tao re : et a ne Deo 18 1944 tldby .gyp 1163$ 2 tb. figs" ',1. Sept 4: 1942 / }-.' . / �11 3 .V27U-' „i/ N F &apt 3 1942 0-i`and b i•nr } ` ��- L B A Webber :: ►o Count: of 'ice, el of en c. yp oy roll acV:a q a to sp for 40e of th a pub : air ev er as e pub rood a And ig3reey 31 _ tnt it rile.rsle. in w j the east )0 ft or the Ni 4' 'tip .w� or the :t41 or i..he lye.,; or sec 15 10 tep 23 a r 3 eve:: atg, O.a3 aoro :.i .3 . 1 aut+ ,3 4•: C.0.r.5.= .:. ._a) easement rim .f.eie11a -aheme rood alto to€olth 'with the rig?lt to make all neoeae slopes ior cuts and 3'il e upon tT e':.uttin , pt ain4 c a easi7.. aide Cr a^ dos ri6nt oZ woy in r doafort*ity eitb ataa, .erd pia a ,,lid S,•ewAf 1c boas �.^ h , Avb. prp.s kou: e1) 3 1942,Dy F. J; Wetber bar Pi C Aridarcori a p for ,c , rest et a r e Cot ::9 1944 t�td �,�r doe sus .� 1 . , s-- I rl ' �• i. - - I C J _ - r '1- Dept 4 19a2 Y�,' 'r) ,, ! , ij : . 3262714 6 -�_,t 3 1942. . Cit1zeg::sre4era2 :`sx1a s .�a Low: 4eetoelatioa of:;easttle l to 1 i 1 tIni r so:1 r ' e ai+'r K fp reel sat - erg-! diae lx.t4 dtrl re b 7 1940 -d by ap to rp for 200It flct 1 .1auxi cfa of Lewis: 9 1940 sago 3085401 ►ia:ir od- in ::ieok 1. 01 of cc: 2 86, with tool debt ' .tiby seotized coop al ei;i e'& aederel ''avi:, s A Loan resosla toa oftetle 3 z Ous4b,_aa, Tie* p; ;;:-- c . avail seat' i c:auSept 3 .942, by ti -. ushin. s slid C 1Tevoll vp aa.3 sally :.f ad carp 1 aorpor -- 1;44 rtae I,. Baines., a p roz van res at s (.:6 .�.::r old by .p _..... . 'Gk1) 4rl3 - y',r" i I. • . . • .. - -. . • . I ; . ••" .-' . . ... 'IA. -.. ,. . I .•--.• ---'1 • . • . . • •.i I . . I i 1 _ • . :. •.• • .. ,,.:-.•••,...F...vss-,-.,-74.:Ii....1.,"?:.;', Fig:-.;.:,,.-.,5,,,,::.,...., .. ,,..•.. .......,::::_,,,•,:..,...,;..,,,,;,,.,..,,.,;,,,7... .t...-,::,,,,it•f....lc.i.r2. ,,.77-...,:y5r,•:::::„:,,,,i:-.i!,.:,.;::::•.:...;r.,,.,:,...c...;.1.-i....,-..:...!..,,..,:.,:,•!'.;',•..z ,••.1':•••••'.'•!i., •'..!., '',...^4•,:' ,''',."•:•!-..i:.:1''-..ii::10,z:•..:::',,'4i.'.!•-;.•:•.1•'.;•.::,....''..-:••1-E7;.:... :;•••••••i:,;:f. :',. •,..:.'7.1'..•„..:'........,. z.;-.,;..•...-.7'!.-.-•.•'''.4.,:fr.: :;'•7 ii."''.•;;;Z:lz.•%':-';‘.......,•,;--.;,!•.?.7...•••:.:;:-.:;:. -,...;..:-.„.••.4,.-:..:•r... •-•••-'.*:.-47:::'::'"••••1,--.''i".•• %'1'.A f 70-3'...ir•I'`,...1.. ti•-.1• i. ......ir.''•' ••0": . . •.' •-1.•••-‘'.7.-'.'....'" -'.•-,-;',.---,-:•47.-::',..:•:--:..,:7:::%--t...,P1,..--_,....,,,.,••;,-..,•---,.••,,,•••.-F,7.1.-.:.- .-=..:-..,:,',...',,••,:i i---n--..r..e:•,.::,7:1,-.,.7••:',,'.••-..--.:!.k.i,..:- r:•-''•'7.'''.'c'•••,U.:-**-1•4'•••••-4,r.f t':.:. 1. •••.-T•-•:•••••,i • -•.• --.•••• sk!,.., .-•• •1--.....-:--,..-,,••-..•-•.;•:.:...-.f_-_,--....;.-..-...-.,..,_;,..;:.:.•.'-.,....i.,,...,--...,-.,... ..',..,•••••;-:-.,:..-,!..7,.:--- ...',.:1-.•••-,.,•,-.:-.5i..... ....,.. ...11..;..7...:2_-..,!,.14. •-:-:..-,...,....,......-livi.,.i....t,,t,•,.......,.:•-•.,.•.....t,!,,i;• ..4.,•;..c.,•;„p.,,,, , .•... ;. ,;„ „ ...., ••.. • ..,.%.. ...., -, i•4:•,%-li'":-.-r-;;:• -':`•.-::.°24;-:...,•.,;'••••' '0-•••'.'!":74:•-'t-7- 1,•::::4'..,!' ',.'-f.;:-.,:-.!.Q•;:',...-;:rf:?:`•i •:"::••••:----".•:-....-::•: ;t''•.,..;':'74',1741'..'-'k vi:':'•; :,1-‘;:.:-•••••••W '..-:1,.4i1".!•••::;i•!7'.,..';'•F..zi::.,1„,•••::j.i.-,•'?:?:::.P.S .;',.,F.7!.::,:.:.!)-•*-:;: 7 ilk'1.!.7,-...i!:L ..---..,-...---.:-.• !.--:-3.-,.,••,:',.',..-...-,:;'.:,•...;-•--:;•-:::-:-1 -',.::::...': '' ‘,.:: `,. ...,t;',!‘,-.--_, -,•-•.•:-f,,,...,',..:,: c!.1,-7113.4;.::::14:-!-!4.;!.. .,..*:-!.1.Y.::'4"1:4-0.;-4i•-tz,;-:,:•• •-if,;Iti-lic•i':•-iiii.5-X;1‘:1.-.;•;t:.,'..•t•••• ** 1:-. --•.-.•'-'::::* ,,,,.-....",'7-,..7:.:::;.:4!...!;•:: --:....i..;•.:-..;,: ::.....'f_'.:i'7,-....i?!:;,•tf.:;:14,11.:tf.Z.."•(••4:1:.....i.:';-;:.;"It,..;';':.;:.'•;-:',.'•:.\''',,r1a.,:':',Zi'14.,''•-_,..,.'.C.I.E'".1....fi f"(,..;17,';Of...,;•:..7:Z:,....r,!"7.1i'7.11'!..0ce'i;','::.''',...*:... i'•....,:;"',1,,,, •.• '-:.45•--,. .:,."" '',..'.:4't.•'. , . :,,,,•`•:-....,,..•.:"..,,),.K .'..I5.•fr:..... ......';„'...."..r.",•:',.0:1...r?"•:....,:,...,;:...1.1%:.,-... f.i7:::"'":}*'.0 0'-;....':.'.4',..ii..••3'.4?1-e:. ".!..'.'7,61,!...1.--::Y•;!...4 ..,:...t....b.. .r,.: ....'.4.."•'',.,;V.....i''"..•. "/"-•,'''''.,-...-."-'''',..... '‘"l'iL.;11.11...;'2"'',......''':;.;,,,...'•:::.Cli.".."?.'''7.42%'!",..3 6i:,':".-.:,.A.'••• ''':.'''...';e'i::-,:..A.;:!..t..4,r/,':".,,....).‘..itt,•!..;.„,.../.!_•:,.,%!!.:::.,.ri:‘'0,(!:.•.,,,,,....:...:.1:- i.:•*.i.•i•r::.....ri.ir ..,,-.....-.•--.•...;!.-tt.•.....,..•;1,••f.:r;-..',.,7,4...,,,:-'::-,:,....-•,-.3„:47.-.. ...,,,,...;',:f..;.;--...-rt.:J••••.;-;,....-:.....v.:II:A;,..,..-7,-...,...:,•,:?•;-:-_,.,-.:„....,-,71.,,....•.,,larp.,••:;,:-...,i...:.,.•-r,-.4.....-..;•„.:...?..4,-ie--,.7:....',":•:,.•:•,,i4't.r?),:J.47k:',•''•;'•:r'••• -,..:I,-'...•.-7'.i ...-:. •77":7 t-•. , ',.-•:,,f:"`.:*-:'.7-.:7-:....'..,!':?.'..i,....4:-.77.-,,,-..%,',.,.....,..••••..';',:',..c,'-:-,7'.••••,'E`.•-...,:.47'..AN'..:;....itn:-.:,1••..‘r.::.'':-7';`,i''.':'..i.'7:'.•-P i.:.4.,:-'.7`-'•-A'':.7.',.*'n‘,,-::•*.::•.F.-7,....7.i.;4:'-.I;1•:.••.i.•?:-..1...,::;;!:;':.''"?,.',..:::7;,:1;;:l.ji-•':%••••."'`,."::•••`,0.*;•7;-ri.,'.'-:.'...F.A.7::,.;''.':'•-•-::•:::re. .-,-,..,-.41 -,...,„..;........,-.:,--.,,......::z:::!,:l.-,••••':,.i..-A........;:.''•:;-••••:•.:•••••,;,,Z:v.)1.,....;:;:•.14,....-•:; ..••,...;..,f•4;%..,-,::::.-...-,:•:,?..,.;.:;;;••.‘,:.•••:.••••,;•.i of.:!.•.-•...1.4;:••!....•,"•:.••;'r;•.'•_•••;•.'...:i:i,,__,I;';:tur..,,'_;,.i,',..;*••.,.....',..,....,, .11 Ai!:••••••!•;;•!,1.,‘:!.'..t.: •..•••, •.A-•••• ., • -i•••..::.,::••:..,..";..'!A..:.'2,•':,:••:-'•••••.0,7'•••'....,'''',7".:•••••••.:-•:-',•::--.1'.4,.,•••••••.‘wl,:i2.,..4%21:7:;,.••••:...! '..•••ei-,-....':.Mate.t.,:•;•••`,1'4..7,..;.1,1;•-•.•';:;t!'^-•.-74....t%'.1.•'...V.,••.'2 c F:..:.i.i...?::.4;•412.7 r r:'..t.'1%•..S.."'',:41,•:.,;::;.',4i. .••••:'.'.,,‘N*.:7... -11.1;••;!•.;`.2*.•.' 7';4.;".;--..----,.:•••••• -Li-...;f:'.•.!-'•-,:i.cr-4::.•-•:::"•'.f.4*..*,•:::!;.,,,,l'z... -,..„.•••-:::-,••••'•:,&s_,,---..;,..-"••••••;,„'N,..,:;;;•.c4r-d_••••#,Virt.i-;•,-•;4..-A...2,r.:::-•••/1,..-• .:•;4•7:t•;--w•f,..,1••••4•::-.:.:•;i•j4••••;;;;,1.ow•E7":•.•;i1-#41'...:itt-';.•21.:ii•41"..f-.1fi•t::•1•••=4;-;,.."F•.ki"•;•:•.'11,.;...-:'i':•S--.'•.; , '7'.-...:'•--''• f.:.•,.....7.&',7*.::',i7;..-•.:;:rt:.r-.:,:,`.1-.i..,::i.:;:•:;,/k-a.:46:•7;:•",•.4.:%"“:5•••.4.1,.:?!:41•":,`".T:?-4it:?,:,',•:::1.•••,.:•71.22'.:7•tt:Ott i;;.1-Fi:•:"..;;,;;.;-:-t.;. "--;ii:,,:.17---.i'..•';:.:i.:eiii7,•,;,;:.t-ti.-5•4•;,,,..4',::,...,;,.":„....,.,,",E...i!...11-yic,.',!t;,;...:tk:Lky!Fq7,,,i1....!"?•4.41.',i,....;....;:.,'.. ,'....:•:•.-4,.:.'• ','*4r.;•'"7,?;':i..71::','"::;f:q.,.;',.!::Pi7.",,,,,:•.::.4::.i':''...:17••'.?!.fie..i:t47.f."!44:;.;:rii4iti.4•74•••::••if):• z•it,.•'.,.'7:,..:::?:i.;•.'•.1t:'!..'••74.•o.,. ...7i:r•A'S:If•.'''...,....d..;',•:!,11gfs'::;;;;It4NAr.tr;.;.z..4'.•••.::.7e,•„,:.:.......1:::-..,;'::47,,•3,i,:;•.-4.12.: '..!:•4.;..144,if.4-,.:i•,•,li;';,.7...•;;!•f..: ,..i.ii.,..."..-..•_, 1...-41.,-......4",....,,*-,..,•..„.„.•,..:11.,,,,•::•;.•_ ::.:--.•.-..,:,,,-;;;:t.,,..*ift,i.v.,-,.,•„,if..,.:5.;•14.1.'.••.;;11;,411..-'47..;'7.•;...':••4•::!••••-krNk7k.,t'd.'.1%,,,,.:44...-.t....).::.7,ty:-.:,•:;:r;!;"4..:.16 ;....r.!-.7'.i.'..;•:;:t - 4,...4::•••.'?;4*;,:::".'..,:::.1'. ".''':',..7::''. ..••••-1..,-,-.;:...!vt,z,.!,..r44-7'2•,•-..,:;.-.4.,.....:!: . .-,:,..7-,:.7.71;.11,.1.z.i..„!•,,,t.;•„.......,:•.07:•,...7.i..!:•;-:.i:.;,..:•,:,.:4.„,•:."•,•••, ,....,-,-'1.10,.1.`,..-%•,„7,,.....,,...,...AN4.:::,••;,!;,•:-•..7.,c;•....,.•:,:.r1-!..«...••••;,..:",-4.,•-•,_;.:,;.•:,,L1.,-,,...:;.r....:,',,-?...,.4:74.:..^..41 M:....116,4';,,i'i•2',s.•••• *:f'..;.1...,: ?".;'Z'''''''.::- ''"E;•:.•1'-':7:-;:f14t!'•',Z;!,11';61;';'-',Fr-..,::;::''''''56.'1•',:*.44:,4.4"..-9:7i.'1:!,'":'::•,:'.*;..9,-,"......44'1;7i.'.t!'.,.tf.:'!,:•,.:.::.41-..,' !):.?..,t.....:'..,,..;‘,..t.i.114.2V-4.i....i:;;;'::::.‘e-r.•.---,•: :.,..t...-•.-.... -....--„,,,....:-•4,,, ;-%•41:41-..::- .. -i-•,'4..•;„fi"::.•;, .,,,,„- :-.•.•:;'.,•,•-'4,14:". „ ,;..;:•‘,t1...i.t.-,14'i••.;,,r,..:•!•41,-,,.4:1.!-•-•t!...:••z•„ii..;'4:S,...,--7...4 7..•'.‘•',;:.',::.',.'i')!1.!. .. ?'-'.4-..!.'';':IY::.-*•';'.'.;:',*.'1..5'11:.i.1...1';'.'.;•,7*.-`,'.....7"..•'-.7'-...'-'.•:•.:;!'...."-....1:•'•:4-;••••••ii:.4.•='-':•-•f';'•••••?;•-!'-'-'i?ell..•-r- '-'1t•''..1r:'7•-•33fe;;13,;-•-kkii:iii:•'\0.:Z• z"-:'--•-•I'••!2'.'1'.-"•-c•*; •-4-42`i.;•-••••1•:1-7.-YF4;:•::•1•.-.-7.•'..FF....i.;,-::::• ,•*:::':::::?;•••1•:;:';'•-;••a«:1!'.%::•:::..,*,‘`-'';.•:-:;,i--„i•-•1:-:;1-'-'-•"';1•,:•-ki':.:.•...".•::'-...:.--.i•::',',-s•-.-:'_•'...:,'Ii.••-,.,?.'•...- , *J.,...,:".P;;;'t ',' ' ..1, .. e...t.44.:,....-....Y,....i...1.".:•4.•',,...',.'...,'...'''''"...''7...:::,,-• ....•'I'.!-:,,,Z;,. . s..,•:' .. .-'. ..-.•, ....'•' -",i,.4",-.!.?;••.;!,,t'...$:•.1.i'.:...!+,:::.,;',,,!;;:e 1`.1f.ri''t.".' .V••• •••••;c:•:i-i-i-..???..::•c. .f,•:1. . ,.-',•%.:',•'il-'4.:•;:'""?-7:•"•:ait..-•-•.*::.:1:'-'*.•1: .'- ' ' ' -1:: ."::',.---•-..-..".•'•. . . .... ..• - • 1 :•-...-,,,'.1::.-'. . - • ..:!...."-,7 , .. .. • . . . i • .- . .. . 4823068 •-• ...,•.?...-.• . : • F 7 D -Aug' . 7--)i- - . - . . f, ....f, • . • Aug 0.*..)( , $1.00 atid. btta t3 v,''''artle. , . • ... • A „i- '•- • ' . .. Edward E 7.-tttse _Klein' and GraiN.et 0 ikaft,t1, . .., .., .• .._ to COunty of King, .St: of --.:;-..•-..•-• •'--.-. ..-- . -- fp for coria1ratioti of . -.• -King,-- $1.00, . and istta to accrue--sm a 44828061-- S 30 Tt o a ..:1....1.: . • - • -;•,.:.•*............ . . . . ", NS:1 -;; . m f . -:gut. 6,4, ...iiiv._ ,of .5.06 10- 23-5 ew -...,...-...*;•! . _._.. .. Containing 0.45 "Aore M/L . . ri/m BE Iibth st. (132nd ,SE to- 142o4 ST) --zatab 1 r'., •-'''''' —56 ':','.,7 • f•.... tgwrigrit . to make .slcpes-- - -. ., •. ._.... •: • • . .... . , .- ... .• . xon. ok 3M •cit • _-1 • • ::•• ''- - .••-•'• ''• • rid by Brd ..., ..-ounty Comm , .,..;;....!,:_-•. • -..• - • •• -- -1, -. . • 4. ' ,...... . , ...! :...1.. .,_ ..•.. - ..... . • •• . . . . - ?,'-''.-•• .•••••,:.: .• - - , . .-••,:a. -.. • •. . ... . . . . _„ . . • -.. • . . • -. • • . • • - . • , . . • ,r• . .. . .. .. . - • ... . , .. • . .. • •' . • •... . . . . , . . .. . .. • --- - ; : . . . . . . . ., -. , .... .- . -- - -- .- .- • Driii"e•-..,--,::..1..;•:::.'4,.:.,-'f:; ,.'.-,..:..Z.'::.::-.....-..."!'•• :•:',..'':•e7.77..,'..-.. -4-r ..-''''..7'''''''-7'''''''"-..'' ,..,' - .....,..,;....:-:,... ...'•. :',. ';.•.:'::::i't.,'......'lit5!".:.•L:".it..::,,.';..74-i•••••:.. .7.-**.t.Vi„!7•-'•71.4:•5•.:..!1;"1,15'1,,- ... - . •,:, .. ..:.:,,,,17--;.."-'-'5•%11-47,..el,.'••-•,-;.5.1'...::i;"Y-..'t-•..;.,-;•71,..?..-.•-:•.;17'!..t.,,,, . ., •-);:r.:;,:t`....'g'•••••,-.7r,•:` '.-:.1•:-..*: •'..:•'•-.;:.:.,.--,":••,-•--- -,t „ . .. •.- . ....,...:-....7.....,,.:.;•.:i....,:-..i-,......:-...,;.;1.,.:•••••.;:::•:....?:1••.....". ,..?•;,-.,:-.-........F,.... AiriLiall11§132611=17 ill I. 411.....,10 • D Seo 25-57 4836103 Sep 9-57 ti. it ben - Allen D. guu}-3, Jr. and June Y, Bush to County of Kings 3tate of WashIngton Fp ay re1 and qo to op --- sm a,a 4836089 --- mHe S 30 f; of the Ez of �.A•1 sk o£ Ei of of Sec 10-23-5 erii cont 0. 11 ao rarl i SE 11.6tt St (132nd SE to 142nd 3E) es tar 10-29-56 togthr 141. h the rt -•-- Da1 ern as form to aig _— X CN OK (F1d by . of Co C;)r: ,t3 ) ,_S ) s i �%. E,- •a�sT-�"4. 4,,, d 7 N �"x-',t •_ �� 'i l�.''?{�tii'- 4. �:-mew YL'!^ ...,4.' hµ, ,.-noz•. ,y-,7, ,.n-N,-. R'�5 �_ ....4%t; tf• 2.-:4*{j �. ez. ` ,' ' .fi_r,�(�,, c .f c ',�'`..i ' r• ',' Z,•�t. ;�• i 0 n !.Srr"- '. ` - _::..2d^4� f t::.._`a: ,-. ..� fa • • r•�fR' .'.' 3:.a� ,r :. ad'- ..]sue... . . .. f ;, v r. �' . '. . . . ..'� - , a. •!: ■ + ' SCh4ol District !t403 6Z3 ;.- := • ° Sur• R� 10.23 5- 01 tO1 p : .. • . • ,,,. '1525 4th Ave. N. _ ' .. O.A.Q. TII17 (5) �12tY 5o er.Gon, :;n, QUIT-CLAIM DEEDN 1144 _ . T.L. 277 •••• ••. The graator.,,,...:._herein__ RENT011._S[`1100.L DSSTRZCT_NQy.A.Q3 • H. R. Johnson _._._..._xj./.4..Lntm1_lr-.. Wpsthingtnn By: Secretar of the Board of uirc`tors...._..._ for the consideration of...._-__.Qae_ a Thot,gnri, nnP � r3 nrPa j$1,1.OA_IIIIl.—.-. ---Dollars rN and also of benefits to accrue to it by reason of Lying oat and establishing a pub'_:road - through it.'..S bed, y—,release- , and quite'-..m_.X - g property,and which is hereinafter described.twave OD . CO to the County of..._......-._....__......_......King __--•-_---.....-State of Washington,for use of the Public • • forever,as a public road and highway,all interest in the following described real estate,viz.: — • . The w. 42 ft. of the N.E. 1 of the N.E. it of the N.W. 1 of Sec. 10, . - Twp. 23 N., R. 5 E.W.M., less the N. 275 ft. \ 1�I ,'I • included within a strip of land 84 ft. in width, having 42 ft. of such width on each side of a centerline described as follows; Beginning at _ the S.W. corner of the E. LI of the E. 11 of the S.W. k of Sec. 10, Twp. ' 23 N., R. 5 E.W.M. thence N. 0° 01 ' 17" E. along the W. line of said - subdivision a distance of 155.90 ft., thence along the arc of a curve _ a•'`i; -=-: . 1 to the left having a radius of 1 ,600 ft., a distance of 195.48 ft . thence . - N. 6° 58' 43" W. a distance of 214.56 ft. thence along the arc of a curve , to the right, having a radius of 1 ,600 ft., a distance of 195.48 ft . thence -a ti41 :l. 0° 01 ' 17" E. a distance of 482.58 ft., thence along the arc of a ,�i curve :o the right having a radius of 1 ,600 ft ., a distance of 195.48 ft ., • .ii thence N . 7° 01 ' 17" E. a distance of 216. 12 ft ., thence along the arc of !I a curve to the left having a radius of 1 ,600 ft . a distance of 195.01 ft., =! thence N . 0° 02' 22" E. a distance of 2,029.60 ft . , thence N. 1° 20' 15" E . a distance of 451 .99 ft . thence along the arc of a curve to the right '" having a radius of 1 ,600 ft ., a distance of 101 .54 ft ., thence N. 4° 58' 22" E. a distance of 465.68 ft . to a terminus on the centerline of the Renton-Issaquah Rd. in Sec . 3, Twp. 23N., R . o 5 E.W.M.E.W•M, at State Highway Sta. 176 + 74 .51 . _-_ Containing 0.37 Acres more or less . R!t•! 1 9 t h Ave . S .E. � :-3� (S.E. 128th St . to Renton-Issaquah Rd. ) i r .�v„ _s. *;-::..-••• Inuether with the right to make all necessary slopes for cuts and fills upon the abutting property and on each ride of said described right-of-way, iu conformity with standard plans and specifications for highway 1• purposes,and to the same extent and purpose as if the rights herein granted hod been acquired by condemnation proceedings under Eminent Doman statutes of the State of Washington, .:>. • -:. situated in the County of .._ .King. . ,Stets of Washington. Dated this. 13th day of October , A. D. 19.6fi. ... ' •' lc tt•13�p,ti. Renton School District No. 403 King County, Washington •?t•.:.�s.,..L ...C..'i e 'e<C_ t BY: S(Clc.R(.L. : ...i1LL.hial:i:J • �C ><s7t..t/v• r .111 IA pnigmommimmomm ImIlill1M1111111111 IIII liiIIIIIIIMPNIMIMMIIINIMIIINEIN tl' '- 5 ,- , J I EM a k STATE OF WASIiINGTX3N • 1 COUNTY OF.....K.nic • - On the .13th day of ____Oh_to.bPr , 19-6E4 before me,a Notary Public in V g. and for the State of Waahington,duly commissioned and sworn,personally• Ser--re-tary....af....the. Tkl-la re rxf Di T-0 r t.ar.2 to me known to be the individtioL. TO 1 described in iLLI d....-lata_execnted the within instrument and acknowledged to me that__...14 _____Itigned I and sealed the as a& his —free and voluntAry set and deed for the uses and purpose therein .11.1 mentioned. • Witness my hand and official seal the day and year fIrst,bovti-wr-1,1 en. s‘ • 's ti t* ....- . 1 -....... X,•c• -'-- --=--" - -. •.: '''' --,- Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing-at_ _...:-• ____....--71.-),' _..eiri .-........._.0/,....t •,_.. ..1. , , - • "ek' 4° . , ; l ; ,I r 3..5 .t A 3 ..4 ......111" i; A - . ir r, ' 11-, :.-'• 0 I --- 71 !; - ,\---- = r.-T-1 i s . cp, _, .... 0 ,,...; i .- I "". :7: , - c-, - 0. 5 •,$), .. 1.. . (....... , I - I - :-..RECORit_2 ... .. - - .. ..., _ I -5 3VOL 512.5 deest. ".--.----a!-- - .-1 . 11 • 1 < 7- '' 55,7 -'''.:1.r.t7 'c ."..' E _ • 1. 7,-. .•, ..i'. • '• C , _- ..., c-• •• "..`77 6• .11 17-- - Z - - 68 AUG PI, " lf 08 r- -A.. x '! ).•-• - 1 :_• ; •.: 1-, C.) 0 ill - ... -::-•*---,- I U - . • - . III (....... . --ROBE kt A ibRRI At::::"l'-.... r- . .. .... a. -: Y. AIN3 cc•Jhrst itAS,-, ...: '..--3 1:7..--.Z• II I I - 2 - ..g. cfPurvz 0 = •-• :7 a ._• II ': II --: 73 -6 .?:"Z. - -. Ci ;I = ', - - = _ :::. .... , • :-. ; -1-I a - il 5. ,.. ._ .3 a .7. ..: = = _ •.:. .. •.' .- . .I ....-_ 7 . . • .•-•- •• :.... 1.. --1:.L.-",.....•":4 : -,•• :-.:-.:1.1.-:.."1„- _.. ,,. -;.........,......,,,,,,,, i qe - 131 (9 ) DRAINAGE REPORT HAZEN HIGH SCHOOL ADDITION Project Number 73-99-137-00 RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 403 RENTON, WASHINGTON 24-4f (,SY wAsii ti 0�, vEt.oPM ENT co CITY of RENTon'n P f '; SEPS0mg 3STE RECEIVED SS'ONAL 046 [EXPIRE:: -llv•e0 J DLR Group Seattle, Washington (206) 461-6000 1 Project Overview INTRODUCTION The project consists of an auditorium addition to an existing high school, as well as interior renovation to portions of the existing school. The building addition will be connected to the existing high school through interior corridors. The facilities are owned by the Renton School District. The project is located in Renton, Washington and is bounded by the existing high school to the West, 142 Ave SE to the east,NE 12th Street to the north, and NE 10th Street to the south. Additional parking will be added south of the new addition and the parking area to the north will be reworked to better accommodate existing bus loading needs. No buildings will be demolished in this project. The existing parking areas to the south and north will be removed and reconstructed. A sanitary sewer main will be extended from the intersection of 10th and 140th East along 10t to 142nd. The main will then be brought down 142nd North to NE 12th Street. The sanitary main will be installed to City of Renton Development standards. Predevelopment EXISTING DRAINAGE CONDITIONS The entire property consists of approximately 34 acres, our project however only disturbs 5.67 acres. The portion of the site adjacent to 142"street tends to drain to the northeast. The remaining acreage tends to drain to the west. The existing site features tend to break up this 5.67 acres into three sub-basins. The first sub-basin (A) includes and runs north of the proposed addition 2.55 acres in size. The second (B), is directly south of the proposed addition 1.75 acres in size. The last sub-basin(C) is further south, bordered by the 10t and 142", and is 1.37 acres in size. The northern area(A) encompasses the main visitor parking, an existing concrete plaza, and several landscape islands. This area also includes an expanse of lawn approximately half and acre in size. These sub-basins meet up when they enter the municipal drainage system on 142"d Ave SE and flow off to the north. Sub-basin(B) currently acts as faculty parking as well as bus unloading. A fire lane runs along the northern edge of this parking lot. Adjacent to the fire lane is a large sidewalk 12' in width that leads into a concrete plaza with occasional planters. South of this sub-basin, along it's entire length is a neighboring property that divides sub-basin (B) from (C). The original construction drawings for this area show that all storm drainage is routed westward and then into the public system located in the 10th street right of way. The final sub-basin (C) encompasses a small parking lot and four tennis courts. As this area is divided from the rest of the school by a neighboring property it feels very remote. All drainage in this area is collected in a series of catch basins and routed into the public storm system along 142" street. This area has almost nothing in the way of vegetation or planters. EXISTING DRAINAGE r i CHARACTERISTICS _ n ----------------- `` „ - --«y__—_.tea----- r=� �•, .��`; -1 /iiii�/,,)/I. / �ii / - �� ��II\ '�' '\r irJ id/if \ ❑ ❑ I j 1 I 1 I \ ♦ —� I 111 1\ 1 \ \ I. ! o.--o \\ I / II I 1 1 \ `� ❑ ❑ 0 l0Ill11 1 \\I V I!! - ' I I / I I 1 1 1 \ \ _� ®�SIN -__ 1 1 1 I1 / -i I if / \�� \\ `I-❑I 1 / it / 1 1 G/ \ \10 \ \\ /� ``\ --- �\ //---\\ I 14�/ i Ill _-/�'11 // -\ yl II 11 \ / /////////�i IIIIIl' \ x— i I \ 11 \ - / 1 Illll .14 �/ PI ��I jjj..t��� \ 1 I 1 / 1 11 1IIii / // ir \ / ' / ` 7 1 I- rl 1----.- / / I IIII A / \ \\ I / I I �( / 1,111 / I •�__-/ / t \\'' II 1 / /' ' } / / 11 6 I I III / / 1 of - ,�/ / / / I IIII ,�w�c. / \ Ire-__ I 11l �l/ / / \ //// / / 11111 ,er N \1 / _/ _ Cf III /� 1 / /\ �\ / / I III I f\ \ 1 \ / I III / I I 1•1 / n\ //////////////// I III III' .' \ 1 \ // !d \\\ h\ \, \ d 11 / I : //// \1 IIIIIIII \, 1 1 \ , I \ ,: J \,, / �1I/ 1 \ /,f,\ / 11111 '\ I \\ i III \\ 1 \` I 0 I1j1 I \- i, \ , (ItT \\ r\I\l( 1. I. Milb\\ tI li. I ❑ II / i \` " )( Pdi�,ll - i I II \\ y J l / /.� e 1 \ / / / 15 ill s \•1I \`\ -'' 1/ \) �' IIII \�\\ '/ \ % P 1:11' II '1 /1 ( I 1 11 `\ �. ,•»' , I. I . / II 1 �"' /////>/ems//7/7/1)/////iiiii/7/i1iS)///////51// 3 \\ 1 Milli I (� I -—_ `\ �� 11 //____-- °I. _ 0 0 0 0 ❑ 0 1 1,Y / / 11 I P II111 / II I I I \N. ,/ I 1 ^ / P l�/Iw / //////////////// - 1 1 I sill II I / 11 / / 1 I IIII \ 1 • /�, /�/•I. ;I ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ / I I 1 , % j I 1 I �II I n I 1 \ / I 1 • ///////////////////////,TITS ////,/////)S'/% / 1 I IIII I I 'c i \\ .�O \ ��it' ,♦ It/ 14ill I� ❑ 11 / I II III l\J\ I. I \-� 11� I / //\��\ / 1IIl!II �t• i I /,, , / \ / \ IIII'h I ---_ c. 1 / /' \ / / IIII,1l`-- - 1 � ' /� I : \ / / 1 / ,111I I ' 1 ❑ HAZEN HIGH SCHOOL / 1 , IIII, ; I g FINISHED FLOOR / 1 o I I 'Ii1 \ I i �����.� \ l �. /, ❑ 1 \ ELLYA7/ON=+•7.O %� 1 ,'\ -J \`_-- 1olollj % ' I i:- II.r' C // \l to / /' I \ii " 0 I �,� ///////////////LO'/,Y//////// //!////!/� / Illi.i 11 I JI u I / /l////i/ , 1 I1 ' \ �_, III .' I o / / 1 11 //� / ...,�.,�;�1..-\ I —p 4 b11; .'�t ire I i 1 / i� /LL//��,//////. jr I l _-al I I 1 "'"/ c 1 I 1 �� c —_ I �' / /� t C /LL — — — i / // 11IIII / ��—I I 1111.ellitS - ' ,, y't % .L //////.////////////////////////// e e // c /�I I I il 'I f I/,,/ I- y C 1t�.�� — 1 .1' �1 I /�� ❑ ` n t .. A�t� ME iii 'y/ • r ti ■� , I , �--'u, \I jll 'ry // 1 4 11`��-/ �/ ✓� o �/ J / , III ���ww.�JJ! ���aaa.�uu��/ RII \\ �; \ '\ WilltillEA11110111111111111 � � t � 1 1�' _ 4 •\� \ � 1 I,�- u/ /''- \ :._ bame • l'' ' , 0 1 61 _1/ ,\1 : . 4.. //.... ..j/ 4416/"J I , h i :if L 4. c i . .. . i -9 _ems J____ .- - ...__.___q_ _�- -.___ _ q _--__-q-._.___=_ __--__-_-a .-__. _- \ — EXISTING LOT A v. EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA i .. . ACRE EXISTING LOT B frfrfr re WA _v.S1iuC. PERVIOUS AREA 005 ACRE EXISTING LOT C • EXISTING PERVIOUS AREA 0.05 ACRE EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA 1 .29 ACRE Postdevelopment DESIGN CRITERIA City of Renton Development Regulations (Title 4) 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual,1995 DETENTION SYSTEM The Santa Barbara Unit Hydrograph, a United States Soil Conservation Service (SCS), derived method will be used to develop rainfall hydrographs and calculate runoff. Software developed f by King County, Washington was used to calculate hydrographs and to size the detention system. DESIGN PARAMETERS The detention system was designed to handle flow according the following criteria: 2 year 24 hour storm (2.10") Postdevelopment runoff to match predevelopment 10 year 24 hour storm (2.95") Postdevelopment runoff to match predevelopment 100 year 24 hour storm (4.00") system to convey postdeveloped runoff. The postdeveloped runoff was designed looking at each sub-basin separately, in order to remain consistent with existing site conditions. In Sub-basin (C)the overall impervious area has been reduced by 435sf. This reduction in impervious area is consistent with the hydrographs in showing a net reduction of stormwater during all storm events. The reduction of impervious area in this sub-basin is all subject to vehicular traffic and is therefore, on paper, better for the overall quality of the stormwater system. No water quality or water quantity treatment is being done on runoff in this sub-basin The drainage characteristics of sub-basin (B) are remaining as is. Although the parking in this lot is being reworked, grades will be held to drain stormwater into the existing catch basins. This lot also has a net reduction of impervious area, approximately 7,800sf. Area subject to vehicular traffic on the other hand is increasing in sub-basin (B) by 4,000sf, this is 1,000sf below the threshold for water quality treatment. In this sub-basin as well, no water quality or water quantity treatment is being done. Sub-basin(A) is the only sub-basin where an increase in impervious area is being implemented. This lot also has an increase in area subject to vehicular traffic above the 5,000sf threshold. A detention system will be used to match pre-development runoff during the 2yr and 25yr storm events. The water quality is being achieved by treating the 2yr 24hr storm with a biofiltration swale. During the 100yr 24hr storm this swale will adequately convey the runoff with 0.5' of freeboard (C.O.R.D.R. 4-6-030E-3-f-ii). POST- DEVELOPED LOT A POST- DEVELOPED LOT B POST- DEVELOPED LOT C ' § (7:4 PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA 0.10 ACRE PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA 1 .27 ACRE Drainage Calculations CALCULATION SUMMARY 2 year, 24 hour rainfall: 2.10" 10 year, 24 hour rainfall: 2.95" 100 year, 24 hour rainfall: 4.00" Curve Number for Pervious Area: 86 Curve Number for Impervious Area: 98 Time of Concentration: 10 minutes (predevelopment & postdevelopment) Predevelopment Runoff(A) Undetained 2 year, 24 hour: 0.90 cfs 10 year, 24 hour: 1.40 cfs 100 year, 24 hour 2.05 cfs Postdevelopment Runoff(A) Undetained Detention Release 2 year, 24 hour(bypass): 0.31 cfs 0.31 cfs 2 year. 24 hour(contained): 0.74 cfs 0.59 cfs 2 year, 24 hour(Total): 1.05 cfs 0.90 cfs 10 year, 24 hour(bypass): 0.46 cfs 0.46 cfs 10 year. 24 hour(contained): 1.11 cfs 0.94 cfs 10 year, 24 hour(Total): 1.57 cfs 1.40 cfs 100 year, 24 hour: 2.21 cfs Predevelopment Runoff(B) Undetained 2 year, 24 hour: 0.83 cfs 10 year, 24 hour: 1.19 cfs 100 year, 24 hour: 1.63 cfs Postdevelopment Runoff(B) Undetained 2 year, 24 hour: 0.78 cfs 10 year, 24 hour: 1.14 cfs 100 year, 24 hour: 1.58 cfs Predevelopment Runoff(C) Undetained 2 year, 24 hour: 0.63 cfs 10 year, 24 hour: 0.91 cfs 100 year, 24 hour: 1.26 cfs Postdevelopment Runoff(C) Undetained 2 year, 24 hour: 0.63 cfs 10 year, 24 hour: 0.91 cfs 100 year, 24 hour: 1.26 cfs Detention Tank Diameter: 24" Required Volume from HYD program: 564 cubic feet Volume required x 30% increase: 733 cubic feet Volume provided: 234 if of tank: 735 cubic feet Control Structure: 12" Orifice Size 2.40"top (1.2' above bottom) 4.57"bottom Hydrograph Calculations ' . cv z - )5 s,Al (A) P/e- ,P 1/11,0.��,.7" hyd KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Surface Water Management Division HYDROGRAPH PROGRAMS Version 4 .21B 1 - INFO ON THIS PROGRAM 2 - SBUHYD 3 - MODIFIED SBUHYD 4 - ROUTE 5 - ROUTE2 6 - ADDHYD 7 - BASEFLOW 8 - PLOTHYD 9 - DATA 10 - RDFAC 11 - RETURN TO DOS ENTER OPTION: 2 SBUH/SCS METHOD FOR COMPUTING RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH STORM OPTIONS : 1 - S .C. S . TYPE-1A 2 - 7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 - STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: 1 S .C. S . TYPE-lA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ (YEAR) , DURATION (HOUR) , PRECIP (INCHES) 2 24 2 . 1 ******************** S . C. S . TYPE-lA DISTRIBUTION ******************** ********* 2-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 2 . 10" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ENTER: A(PERV) , CN (PERV) , A(IMPERV) , CN (IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 1 . 18 86 1 . 37 98 10 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA (ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC (MINUTES) A CN A CN 2 . 5 1 . 2 86 . 0 1 .4 98 . 0 10 . 0 PEAK-Q (CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL (CU-FT) . 90 7 . 83 13273 ENTER Ed: ] [path] filename [ .ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: haudne2 SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP c 2 . 95 ******************** S . C. S . TYPE-lA DISTRIBUTION ******************** ********* 10-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 2 . 95" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ENTER: A(PERV) , CN (PERV) , A(IMPERV) , CN (IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 1 . 18 86 1 . 37 98 10 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC (MINUTES) A CN A CN 2 . 5 1 . 2 86 . 0 1 .4 98 . 0 10 . 0 PEAK-Q (CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL (CU-FT) 1 .40 7 . 83 20445 ENTER Ed: ] [path] filename [ .ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: haudnel0 SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP c STORM OPTIONS : 1 - S .C. S . TYPE-1A 2 - 7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 - STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: 1 S .C. S . TYPE-lA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ (YEAR) , DURATION (HOUR) , PRECIP (INCHES) 100 24 4 . 00 ******************** S .C . S . TYPE-lA DISTRIBUTION ******************** ********* 100-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 4 . 00" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ENTER: A(PERV) , CN (PERV) , A(IMPERV) , CN(IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 1 . 18 86 1 . 37 98 10 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA (ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC (MINUTES) A CN A CN 2 . 5 1 . 2 86 . 0 1 . 4 98 . 0 10 . 0 PEAK-Q (CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL (CU-FT) 2 . 05 7 . 83 29615 ENTER [d: ] [path] filename [ .ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: haudne100 FILE ALREADY EXIST; OVERWRITE (Y or N) ? • S(4- /?G s,,/ (I) ivos—D<ve6pn v7 2 SBUH/SCS METHOD FOR COMPUTING RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH STORM OPTIONS : 1 - S . C. S . TYPE-lA 2 - 7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 - STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: 1 S . C. S . TYPE-lA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ (YEAR) , DURATION (HOUR) , PRECIP (INCHES) 2 24 2 . 10 ******************** S . C. S . TYPE-lA DISTRIBUTION ******************** ********* 2-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 2 . 10" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ENTER: A(PERV) , CN (PERV) , A(IMPERV) , CN(IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0 . 39 86 1 . 39 98 10 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA (ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC (MINUTES) A CN A CN 1 . 8 . 4 86 . 0 1 .4 98 . 0 10 . 0 PEAK-Q (CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL (CU-FT) . 74 7 . 83 10757 ENTER [d: ] [path] filename [ .ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: haudnc2 FILE ALREADY EXIST; OVERWRITE (Y or N) ? Y SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP c ENTER: A (PERV) , CN (PERV) , A(IMPERV) , CN(IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 2 0 .22 86 0 . 55 98 10 P DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA (ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC (MINUTES) A CN A CN . 8 . 2 86 . 0 . 6 98 . 0 10 . 0 PEAK-Q (CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL (CU-FT) . 31 7 . 83 4477 ENTER [d: ] [path] filename [ .ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 0 0 haudnb2 FILE ALREADY EXIST; OVERWRITE (Y or N) ? Y SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP n STORM OPTIONS : 1 - S . C. S . TYPE-lA 2 - 7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 - STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: 1 S .C . S . TYPE-1A RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ (YEAR) , DURATION(HOUR) , PRECIP (INCHES) 10 24 2 . 95 • ******************** S . C. S . TYPE-lA DISTRIBUTION ******************** ********* 10-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 2 . 95" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ENTER: A(PERV) , CN (PERV) , A (IMPERV) , CN (IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0 . 39 86 1 . 39 98 10 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC (MINUTES) A CN A CN 1 . 8 . 4 86 . 0 1 .4 98 . 0 10 . 0 PEAK-Q (CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL (CU-FT) 1 . 11 7 . 83 16001 ENTER [d: ] [path] filename [ . ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: haudncl0 FILE ALREADY EXIST; OVERWRITE (Y or N) ? Y SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP c ENTER: A (PERV) , CN (PERV) , A(IMPERV) , CN (IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 2 0 . 22 86 0 . 55 98 10 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA (ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC (MINUTES) A CN A CN . 8 . 2 86 . 0 . 6 98 . 0 10 . 0 PEAK-Q (CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL (CU-FT) .46 7 . 83 6717 ENTER [d: ] [path] f i l ename [ .ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: haudnbl0 FILE ALREADY EXIST; OVERWRITE (Y or N) ? Y SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP n STORM OPTIONS : 1 - S .C. S . TYPE-lA 2 - 7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 - STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: 1 S .C. S . TYPE-lA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ (YEAR) , DURATION (HOUR) , PRECIP (INCHES) 100 24 4 . 00 ******************** S .C. S . TYPE-lA DISTRIBUTION ******************** ********* 100-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 4 . 00" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ENTER: A (PERV) , CN (PERV) , A (IMPERV) , CN(IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0 . 39 86 1 . 39 98 10 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC (MINUTES) A CN A CN 1 . 8 .4 86 . 0 1 . 4 98 . 0 10 . 0 PEAK-Q (CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL (CU-FT) 1 . 56 7 . 83 22591 ENTER [d: ] [path] filename [ .ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: haudncll FILE ALREADY EXIST; OVERWRITE (Y or N) ? Y SPECIFY : C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP c ENTER: A(PERV) , CN (PERV) , A (IMPERV) , CN(IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 2 0 . 22 86 0 . 55 98 10 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA (ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC (MINUTES) A CN A CN . 8 . 2 86 . 0 . 6 98 . 0 10 . 0 PEAK-Q (CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL (CU-FT) . 66 7 . 83 9545 ENTER Ed: ] [path] f i lename [ . ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: haudnbll FILE ALREADY EXIST; OVERWRITE (Y or N) ? Y SPECIFY : C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP 1 S . C. S . TYPE-lA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ (YEAR) , DURATION (HOUR) , PRECIP (INCHES) 2 24 2 . 1 ******************** S .C. S . TYPE-lA DISTRIBUTION ******************** ********* 2-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 2 . 10" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ENTER: A(PERV) , CN (PERV) , A(IMPERV) , CN (IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0 . 21 . 03 86 1 . 72 98 10 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA (ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC (MINUTES) A CN A CN 1 . 8 . 0 86 . 0 1 . 7 98 . 0 10 . 0 PEAK-Q (CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL (CU-FT) . 83 7 . 83 11792 ENTER [d: ] [path] filename [ .ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: haudha SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP C ENTER: A (PERV) , CN (PERV) , A(IMPERV) , CN (IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 2 0 . 21 • 86 1 . 54 98 10 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA (ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC (MINUTES) A CN A CN 1 . 8 . 2 86 . 0 1 . 5 98 . 0 10 . 0 PEAK-Q (CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL (CU-FT) . 78 7 . 83 11172 ENTER Ed: ] [path] filename [ .ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: haudbn SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP n STORM OPTIONS : 1 - S .C. S . TYPE-lA 2 - 7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 - STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: 1 S .C. S . TYPE-lA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ (YEAR) , DURATION (HOUR) , PRECIP (INCHES) 10 24 2 . 95 ******************** S .C. S . TYPE-lA DISTRIBUTION ******************** ********* 10-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 2 . 95" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ENTER: A(PERV) , CN (PERV) , A (IMPERV) , CN (IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0 . 03 86 1 . 72 98 10 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC (MINUTES) A CN A CN 1 . 8 . 0 86 . 0 1 . 7 98 . 0 10 . 0 PEAK-Q (CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL (CU-FT) 1 . 19 7 . 83 17141 ENTER Ed: ] [path] f i lename [ .ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: haudbel0 SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP c ENTER: A(PERV) , CN (PERV) , A (IMPERV) , CN (IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 2 0 . 21 86 1 . 54 98 10 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC (MINUTES) A CN A CN 1 . 8 . 2 86 . 0 1 . 5 98 . 0 10 . 0 PEAK-Q (CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL (CU-FT) 1 . 14 7 . 83 16423 ENTER Ed: ] [path] f ilename [ .ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: haudbnl0 SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP n STORM OPTIONS : 1 - S .C. S . TYPE-lA 2 - 7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 - STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: 1 S .C. S . TYPE-lA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ (YEAR) , DURATION (HOUR) , PRECIP (INCHES) 100 24 4 . 0 ******************** S .C. S . TYPE-lA DISTRIBUTION ******************** ********* 100-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 4 . 00" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ENTER: A (PERV) , CN (PERV) , A(IMPERV) , CN (IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0 . 03 86 1 . 72 98 10 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC (MINUTES) A CN A CN 1 . 8 . 0 86 . 0 1 . 7 98 . 0 10 . 0 PEAK-Q (CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL (CU-FT) 1 . 63 7 . 83 23773 ENTER Ed: ] [path] f i lename [ . ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: haudbell SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP c ENTER: A(PERV) , CN (PERV) , A(IMPERV) , CN (IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 2 0 . 21 86 1 . 54 98 10 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA (ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC (MINUTES) A CN A CN 1 . 8 . 2 86 . 0 1 . 5 98 . 0 10 . 0 PEAK-Q (CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL (CU-FT) 1 . 58 7 . 83 22977 ENTER Ed: ] [path] f ilename [ . ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: haudbnll SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP • �L - ?6 $//t/ (c) R Dve/o /iilw 7// s STORM OPTIONS : 1 - S .C. S . TYPE-lA 2 - 7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 - STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: 1 S . C . S . TYPE-lA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ (YEAR) , DURATION (HOUR) , PRECIP (INCHES) 2 24 2 . 1 ******************** S . C. S . TYPE-1A DISTRIBUTION ******************** ********* 2-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 2 . 10" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ENTER: A (PERV) , CN (PERV) , A(IMPERV) , CN(IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0 . 09 86 1 . 28 98 10 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC (MINUTES) • A CN A CN 1 .4 . 1 86 . 0 1 . 3 98 . 0 10 . 0 PEAK-Q (CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL (CU-FT) . 63 7 . 83 9002 ENTER Ed: ] [path] f i lename [ . ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: haudce2 SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP c ENTER: A(PERV) , CN (PERV) , A(IMPERV) , CN (IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 2 0 . 10 86 1 . 27 98 10 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC (MINUTES) A CN A CN 1 . 4 . 1 86 . 0 1 . 3 98 . 0 10 . 0 PEAK-Q (CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL (CU-FT) . 63 7 . 83 8968 ENTER Ed: ] [path] f i lename [ . ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: haudcn2 SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP n STORM OPTIONS : 1 - S .C. S . TYPE-lA 2 - 7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 - STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: 1 S . C. S . TYPE-lA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ (YEAR) , DURATION (HOUR) , PRECIP (INCHES) 10 24 2 . 92 ******************** S .C. S . TYPE-lA DISTRIBUTION ******************** ********* 10-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 2 . 95" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ENTER: A (PERV) , CN (PERV) , A(IMPERV) , CN (IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0 . 09 86 1 . 28 98 10 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA (ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC (MINUTES) A CN A CN 1 . 4 . 1 86 . 0 1 . 3 98 . 0 10 . 0 PEAK-Q (CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL (CU-FT) . 91 7 . 83 13153 ENTER [d: ] [path] filename [ .ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: haudcel0 SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP c ENTER: A(PERV) , CN (PERV) , A (IMPERV) , CN(IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 2 0 . 10 86 1 .27 98 10 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA (ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC (MINUTES) A CN A CN 1 .4 . 1 86 . 0 1 . 3 98 . 0 10 . 0 PEAK-Q (CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL (CU-FT) . 91 7 . 83 13114 ENTER Ed: ] [path] f i lename [ . ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: haudcnl0 SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP n STORM OPTIONS : 1 - S .C. S . TYPE-lA 2 - 7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 - STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: 1 S .C. S . TYPE-lA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ (YEAR) , DURATION(HOUR) , PRECIP (INCHES) 100 24 4 . 0 ******************** S . C. S . TYPE-lA DISTRIBUTION ******************** ********* 100-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 4 . 00" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ENTER: A (PERV) , CN (PERV) , A(IMPERV) , CN (IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0 . 09 86 1 . 28 98 10 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC (MINUTES) A CN A CN 1 . 4 . 1 86 . 0 1 . 3 98 . 0 10 . 0 PEAK-Q (CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL (CU-FT) 1 . 26 7 . 83 18317 ENTER Ed: ] [path] f i lename [ .ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: haudcell SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP c ENTER: A(PERV) , CN (PERV) , A(IMPERV) , CN (IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 2 0 . 10 86 1 . 27 98 10 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC (MINUTES) A CN A CN 1 . 4 . 1 86 . 0 1 . 3 98 . 0 10 . 0 PEAK-Q (CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL (CU-FT) 1 . 26 7 . 83 18273 ENTER Ed: ] [path] filename [ .ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: haud cnll SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP ^C Detention Tank Calculations I: --- /?5-/;(/ (;41) PERFORMANCE: INFLOW TARGET-OUTFLOW ACTUAL-OUTFLOW PK-STAGE STORAGE DESIGN HYD: 1 . 11 . 94 . 94 2 . 00 564 TEST HYD 1 : . 74 . 59 . 59 1 . 11 320 STRUCTURE DATA: R/D TANK (FLAT GRADE) et 7 O 14. RISER-HEAD TANK-DIAM STOR-DEPTH TANK-LENGTH7 STORAGE-VOLUME 2 . 00 FT 2 . 00 FT 2 . 00 FT 180 . 0 FT 564 CU-FT DOUBLE ORIFICE RESTRICTOR: DIA (INCHES) HT (FEET) Q-MAX (CFS) BOTTOM ORIFICE : 4 . 57 . 00 . 800 TOP ORIFICE : 2 .40 1 . 20 . 140 ROUTING DATA: STAGE (FT) DISCHARGE (CFS) STORAGE (CU-FT) PERM-AREA (SQ-FT) . 00 . 00 . 0 . 0 . 20 . 25 29 . 4 . 0 .40 . 36 80 . 5 . 0 . 60 . 44 142 . 7 . 0 . 80 . 51 211 . 2 . 0 1 . 00 . 57 282 . 7 . 0 1 . 20 . 62 354 . 2 . 0 1 . 40 . 74 422 . 8 . 0 1 . 60 . 81 484 . 9 . 0 1 . 80 . 88 536 . 0 . 0 2 . 00 . 94 565 . 5 . 0 2 . 10 1 . 28 565 . 5 . 0 2 . 20 1 . 87 565 . 5 . 0 2 . 30 2 . 62 565 . 5 . 0 2 .40 3 . 44 565 . 5 . 0 2 . 50 3 . 75 565 . 5 . 0 AVERAGE VERTICAL PERMEABILITY: . 0 MINUTES/INCH SPECIFY: F - FILE, N - NEWJOB, P - PRINT IF/OF, R - REVISE, S - STOP r SUMMARY OF INPUT ITEMS 1) TYPE OF FACILITY: TANK 2) TANK DIAMETER (ft) , STORAGE DEPTH (ft) : 2 . 00, 2 . 00 3) VERTICAL PERMEABILITY (min/in) : . 00 4) PRIMARY DESIGN HYDROGRAPH FILENAME: haudncl0 5) PRIMARY RELEASE RATE (c f s) : . 94 6) NUMBER OF TEST HYDROGRAPHS : 1 TEST HYD 1 FILENAME : haudnc2 TARGET RELEASE (cfs) : . 59 7) NUMBER-OF-ORIFICES, RISER-HEAD (ft) , RISER-DIAM (in) : 2 , 2 . 00 , 12 8) ITERATION DISPLAY: YES ENTER ITEM NUMBER TO BE REVISED (ENTER ZERO IF NO REVISIONS ARE REQUIRED) : 0 INITIAL STORAGE VALUE FOR ITERATION PURPOSES : 5451 CU-FT BOTTOM ORIFICE : ENTER Q-MAX (cfs) . 8 DIA. = 4 . 57 INCHES TOP ORIFICE : ENTER HEIGHT (ft) 1 .2 DIA. = 2 .40 INCHES ITERATION COMPUTATION BEGINS . . . TRIAL TANK-LENGTH STOR-AVAIL STOR-USED PK-STAGE PK-OUTFLOW 1 1735 . 1 5451 1776 . 72 .48 2 1150 . 2 3613 1528 . 88 . 53 3 818 . 5 2571 1350 1 . 04 . 58 4 624 . 2 1960 1212 1 . 19 . 62 5 505 . 0 1586 1080 1 . 29 . 67 6 424 . 5 1333 990 1 . 39 . 73 7 369 . 8 1161 918 1 . 48 . 77 8 331 . 2 1040 860 1 . 54 . 79 9 302 . 5 950 812 1 . 60 . 81 10 280 . 6 881 775 1 . 65 . 83 11 263 . 8 828 746 1 . 70 . 85 12 250 . 7 787 722 1 . 73 . 86 13 240 . 4 755 703 1 . 76 . 87 14 232 . 1 729 686 1 . 79 . 88 15 225 . 4 708 672 1 . 81 . 88 16 219 . 8 690 660 1 . 83 . 89 17 215 . 1 675 650 1 . 85 . 90 18 211 . 0 662 640 1 . 87 . 90 19 207 . 5 651 632 1 . 89 . 91 20 204 . 4 642 625 1 . 90 . 91 21 201 . 8 633 619 1 . 91 . 91 22 199 . 4 626 613 1 . 92 . 92 23 197 .4 620 608 1 . 93 . 92 24 195 . 6 614 604 1 . 94 . 92 25 194 . 0 609 600 1 . 94 . 92 26 192 . 6 605 597 1 . 95 . 93 27 191 .4 601 594 1 . 96 . 93 28 190 . 3 597 591 1 . 96 . 93 29 189 . 3 594 589 1 . 96 . 93 30 188 . 4 591 586 1 . 97 . 93 31 187 . 6 589 584 1 . 97 . 93 32 186 . 9 587 583 1 . 97 . 93 33 186 . 2 585 581 1 . 98 . 93 34 185 . 7 583 580 1 . 98 . 93 35 185 . 2 581 578 1 . 98 . 93 36 184 . 7 580 577 1 . 98 . 93 37 184 . 3 578 576 1 . 98 . 94 38 183 . 9 577 575 1 . 99 . 94 39 183 . 6 576 574 1 . 99 . 94 40 183 . 3 575 573 1 . 99 . 94 41 183 . 0 574 573 1 . 99 . 94 42 182 . 7 574 572 1 . 99 . 94 43 182 . 5 573 571 1 . 99 . 94 44 182 . 2 572 571 1 . 99 . 94 45 182 . 0 571 570 1 . 99 . 94 46 181 . 8 571 569 1 . 99 . 94 47 181 . 6 570 569 1 . 99 . 94 48 181 .4 569 568 1 . 99 . 94 49 181 . 2 569 568 1 . 99 . 94 50 181 . 1 568 567 1 . 99 . 94 51 180 . 9 568 567 1 . 99 . 94 52 180 . 8 567 567 1 . 99 . 94 53 180 . 7 567 566 1 . 99 . 94 54 180 . 5 567 566 1 . 99 . 94 55 180 .4 566 566 2 . 00 . 94 56 180 . 3 566 565 2 . 00 . 94 57 180 . 2 566 565 2 . 00 . 94 58 180 . 1 565 565 2 . 00 . 94 59 180 . 0 565 564 2 . 00 . 94 PERFORMANCE : INFLOW TARGET-OUTFLOW ACTUAL-OUTFLOW PK-STAGE STORAGE DESIGN HYD: 1 . 11 . 94 . 94 2 . 00 564 TEST HYD 1 : . 74 . 59 . 59 1 . 11 320 SPECIFY: D - DOCUMENT, R - REVISE, A - ADJUST ORIF, E - ENLARGE, S - STOP d PERFORMANCE : INFLOW TARGET-OUTFLOW ACTUAL-OUTFLOW PK-STAGE STORAGE DESIGN HYD: 1 . 11 . 94 . 94 2 . 00 564 TEST HYD 1 : . 74 . 59 . 59 1 . 11 320 STRUCTURE DATA: R/D TANK (FLAT GRADE) RISER-HEAD TANK-DIAM STOR-DEPTH TANK-LENGTH STORAGE-VOLUME 2 . 00 FT 2 . 00 FT 2 . 00 FT 180 . 0 FT 564 CU-FT DOUBLE ORIFICE RESTRICTOR: DIA (INCHES) HT (FEET) Q-MAX (CFS) BOTTOM ORIFICE : 4 . 57 . 00 . 800 TOP ORIFICE : 2 .40 1 . 20 . 140 ROUTING DATA: STAGE (FT) DISCHARGE (CFS) STORAGE (CU-FT) PERM-AREA (SQ-FT) . 00 . 00 . 0 . 0 . 20 . 25 29 .4 . 0 . 40 . 36 80 . 5 . 0 . 60 .44 142 . 7 . 0 . 80 . 51 211 .2 . 0 1 . 00 . 57 282 . 7 . 0 1 . 20 . 62 354 . 2 . 0 1 . 40 . 74 422 . 8 . 0 1 . 60 . 81 484 . 9 . 0 1 . 80 . 88 536 . 0 . 0 2 . 00 . 94 565 . 5 . 0 2 . 10 1 . 28 565 . 5 . 0 2 . 20 1 . 87 565 . 5 . 0 2 . 30 2 . 62 565 . 5 . 0 2 . 40 3 . 44 565 . 5 . 0 2 . 50 3 . 75 565 . 5 . 0 AVERAGE VERTICAL PERMEABILITY: . 0 MINUTES/INCH Biofiltration Swale Calculations . l _ Calculations DLR Group Date Subject Computed Checked Project Name Project Number Page(of pages) n'7. , „:4f -/ c c /7 /2 -= /• H9A ) j/3 f> --z`' /c/9 S r zlJ�l� 5 W4,-( evs . ‘‘' - s l/ /.=-- V' „(. . 0 , 7?e 0-t � L Calculations DLR Group Date Subject Computed Checked Project Name Project Number Page (of pages) xdr — c/f ce- i3 = p G „ /_ 1 1 3..