Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA99-141 COMM MILYWILN iluli FR FR 11111€- .I€- 111111111€_ I-.1€- 111111/11 _®®® IIII11 as L • 'El El EB On .„NELLEN„ MEI == Filli.. .. .. Fi= mi Fin Fr9 -- .. .. . m . . rinmr_mr LI a i --- RI :LS MORE a. a —_- -- -_-_ —_—_ —_—_ —_ *—��■r_=ram - ■1■�.t■■ ■■ 11 ❑❑1■�■i �� s_■■■�I��I■ 1 6 a o cc E I I dlTwi ro PIKPMED WM* /' main MINI a) 1 L aH _6 62 STEEL CANOPY I WEST ELEVATION - BUILDING 'A �• as w.. L. 77xn ems (1) or.Z \ r _ ,oM — — I— F I - I-14 , z .E ® m — — [1 — II —__= --, __.- ri : tR i R. ® ®� _- NOM mrw saoa s.�r 1=-----_ ___ -_—___-_ _-- - - I _I t yam..f 3 fiLL 1 I _ A _ . I I <_ I r - �,�r 4--- : ;1 - „ ti� a —� uu uu uu uu -- _ II I ❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ _ ISB. i i aE: 10/0199. 8rrE PLAN APPROVAL .,_ WEST ELEVATION - BUILDING 'B' A5.1 99017 C i ! 1. UTILITIES NOTE: lli I ALL PROPOSED STORM WATER AND 1 SANITARY SEWER DRAIN LINES, WATER i h SERVICES, AND FIRE PROTECTION LINES SHALL BE CONNECTED TO EXISTING UTILITIES WITHIN THE CITY R/W. LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE FURNISHED BY THE OWNER. ojf ,,1 • /27/99 N 01'30'48" E 560.05' (560.09' CITY OF RENTON) nos �'ti �1 I LIMITS OF S. BURNETT ST. [WORK �x Is ��� s z 'o ' N 11' 411.14 (60 nm_ U i l 11111111111F II : I i �� 1/7 •1214" , A .. l= j *o re maw., .� k.1- F� AST.ft... : • PROPO U L I c _ 1 1 1,Z " 11.1 co°' S. i S / cn J 1 c0 A ... 1 I 1I I :I � � 1 � f II Eiu = m. 0, w z V wLI //////////////// �4 — } ALLEY :� T w o z I i ti •. .7 iiiiiill:/�iiiiiiiiiiiiifi*iiiiiiiiiiiiiriiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiJ I a s / ti „ r., f o I 1 4 // I m �'4 i .1.71.11.14134 MUMPS w W VI P. o F SITE PLAN ID W SHT CI JOB NO:99-4519 _- . ^`'`qr s:$ k•ci e, B:.S,A"iwL sa"µv e. � B :r% 2c tl:." 3'•%?,°°t •`e .p7 y„ ""` .,� .. < . ...,. a• s� 1a< r µ.• fie° t . 0 I. \..0 t, m ,t•i 1p4v; s"<< t y IZ,, L ,ii.. •`"•'L 2 / a"t `.""'�r ,'y,v:° ° e`%' u. 'tT..� ''� u, 61:1 3. ��,1 a� 9. CT:.•L �r1,'"' `tif ,. <T.•a• I :sr•ef' •l° i °�,� "16� s. • :Sr. ! •v � 9 w °o sl Vp1` °pod 9: �l'a�1 >..�'� ,p° r e ram', '�"/_ I O , ,i� s.:.. 91 w •®. ®g' O ikq V -''' - I" .;°'z L • ';' I .M' ,..°1 _T O•' '': :4. / ¢,© _> w.. S sr p:,s�1 s mj�o+✓ 9 al'�:t1L� �., 9" \" 1 _ - •5E1 y ;4._ ,�1 \ . • :`d_ `•t:•a Z ns••1 .,z�• 6.. ���{- F p .000 o pl9oiIONv'r :tl ,°`a.v < �: ��'I tl :•ayx lean ,...,-+• �v�- 4.700 q+ . ,•'.. rim" • ,l . ..'a ...:r. ei, to eel '/(A ., tt ,nrar f„•�• � .. ;.sNa • . NI • °a.'' S•• .I"/ °"1 t: •91 :�.i a^' � »�..,\ I» _ t hr ••t +_ )•,..° • 6'» a •4 '..H,...• i .(,It" p<, z• �, 1 z: .si . !,°tt, t' adf i e`; a II.4#t _°a. -t' - ;"`. " has s 0 0°°.. /y/ l µr• o•...L,_ ��.•;O .. d' - 1 ti' aFp rE rps•'�t :Pet., ; W ,+: ', ca .rd•Mw1 �{,„/`d03 0?.,r �i y 0� Erld p°•<E" �, yoz° >"p,r \ .t � � : •: : » t ✓'..1�'.. �.a 7 , 01.6 1 .. '. >su S u • „t*% 's S e'is Cl) Htsn�oip� 'a ,yam cx•"o-"'�'v �."" �}'t 0 �F.+a �y,�y� .r f11Y�l.SYI» »li(1A51�` r 44 ix� t ply . s• .sii s Z1= 4O'' ,..'• ,` _ "`s3I 1 calffl "M �`» illi ,2 'o e 11 'e 9• .sir awl l a .��'..9��� s I..' ." •` ` n;4• et. CEM a•• i mmg }',i ! j• - 9 I I ' ,s I:, : ••_omor ,d, c of 4Zr 9 t i ', :NEE, �1 e a,. :' a r $ min • . :+.... i' . ' ; �/rMW S•O,,V`",,L y •�S�N •11�� L' ' • rani • riEN1 EMI CUM MN ��OO' ,." - r \ •9 .^ .� r'° a ;.z ' i y3 p'' 9 v .sly�T. >�� ro s'.� � 3 r �.y t ,. �•' \�`�4, .•• ` / f 'w'-. :%t< ,•I°s . `�% - $�' ,c:°w1� F'rriifl � � =aCY•n� .` ' tl ,96,,,...x� '.`\ x. \ ,�,p,a c s'H' • x a s a aril' ♦, no: -~i : al °�t,..z..<,erow Y ."t7 4-':t u '- �'`�. , O° a 1 •,y 5M' +'`',ds4.. c 6 1Z S ` 1; )11 � `p .. s ..,.ss ski'• i �\ ids"1 9`a $ V.a1,,>' , p,p, ,yv<s' _ ` '''o'' p 'AEI j2 ++ Nall ��` �����0i.. xd'. 01°..jp Ssl . 4�bS /V•/r«ar 1 t: t II �3.0�L 1 t y tl>„I „, 1` /).• n: °•iiiiwirl ,. ''-- lb 1 ,u .1 .:'• •( •. • atlS _ s.a - is O.1., r-s . r ..` ..1 t .a nil N" 'p'bl..' 019 `�.. f9 fwi. � e. ESE via'<usy. ..z. aa'b'i,g, ®id�.d�15i(fi :s, '.nI-144»I»• �', ~»I- h»Il„ �`•. ,.1'• sa °I I� A. IWl ;�4a,.•s .Sn ,uaW ai as•'" s 3 . y �.a ,r. at c .•%ws.�.l_i . '� t 0� i ;�'tl Ip�r t u ill 7 L f,f/ "'4 . is,.,.+�• Yr Q• to,. GI , \i. ? M' r . • sl,rp+E' w ' •cI 1, /( l a+' 1I'P/ F�O�tt .4s Sall-i ' v� `ta/e, t, .. .S g liZe l a 1 ®/:�•o'�'6 ' . .99110°I'1- 9• I" Cif 1111 k t,NF 0 , ? 4 C b3Alb z I .a r i D, '. grail11.F°1" ` ._„ t- :ap` `+ ® MI M�.1';n �,�:.�/�� ,• ,�� t Y `'� bb03J a. .11 -.®I °' mil • :910.9 I1 <^°.i1 S ,t u .91 '�,w IX,1 N aa, R V t.�. � f���'.�� IS t', SPUME �zr. ryry 3� �.e� <`^ ,610 _a ..!'r'z'i II VZ IfiE 1 .1.* .� 9• 1 �Ifi'I'''I,r.✓c s • Sc* Ji'Ir ., °e oil.„ec•A, 191 Svf g °r =if ,g Boz,; 17 ,.a • MEM� t.. __ --..i.s1� I „� .w ;, Tv . , a — .NSA ,.+.a w ,xo 0.0Mr_ .. .t 4 f-:I 'lilt- 6 „.a., z.—.....s--re IsC N 003SI S LW a / ♦ ta,` f � _ '✓ � • a e .• m a, c.: _ •,...... � e 4 aT . • 9aa yw.• �r .- ' 4.1it- • t11! , 1 I ` laauai t : : w / y > r • 'g s- ,Egi 12 ' t p i °�• I 0Ar 21tIMMe : I 1 ,•,Ifs 9., / a q - G. v ✓^ ' ° . .° { ,am r z J m m t ,� „r 1 e. `, •yam N.0 • - _ T• e Q I ` a> a\ 'i' •I -0. .., z d , t'S t "• •. ..t.I . • ' ' i f L I0° *.hpa iv -- ca wI x_ L_ > 7 • Il << f nellyzi rm. �• 9p`"4 0"1M�B 1. 3� Y° • ~Y-j1__ • I,a{-r• S c. . Im - ®j <:u.....4 �Or b' ®, d �:1 <[•.,, • : isA. jJ ' tat St X At.• ®.a. `', �` "I• I. a.,° wi'''.7)-1-7175..!: e I� f lY tt�' I °,,;' ,F ' °,.. d....I N.. :. • 1 ( ,µ t 1'' s+'t.: � \ ~\>.1.: , ,. , 1;,. _6•_ ._.� _k .r.:11.*, I: <'s•t 14'...'I� irver-- I i 1 ., SHERIDAN - RENTON LEGAL DESCRIPTION LAND USE COMPLIANCE REFERENCE PROJECT INFORMATION: INDEX OF DRAWINGS LOTS I Arn 2,AND LOTS 3 rua'AyW S.NauSGE. SITE AREA Nal N r 51 ACRES, TOS ADDRESS Da,A110 MET.RAT O M TOW O ROE..A330025 G r0 TIE PLAT A T RECORDED.l YDLlPE I OF PLATS.PAGE,G5 N KING 5,50.1.r _,,DA, CI, WA ARCHITECTURAL "A" 5'FEET O LOTS 3 CRElICIA.L DOWTaw(CD, aDOLIG1 6.«aIASIVE CONVEYED TO TLE COT CIF RENTO'FOR r u6E.0Lmsm caRleecial_RESIDemx.P45000 OWNER SECTION 0 COVER SKEET LEY DT OECD RECORDED umEw IecaoFG NEVER 4332611. ALLOYED �COOHERCIAL.RESIDENTIAL,P.XNG NA, AD/ TITLE/COvER SWEET,PRO.,NFOR,CN ADOES,S..0 m„300E.au.ae m. .-3I-I0.1D3 NacnE IEGwT ALLOYED. SECTION 1 SITE INFORMATION PRCPG,ED, K'(SEE 0.111.01140 ELEVATIO0./ Den Doll •• Ch bed. All SITE PLAT TAX ACCOUNT NUMBERS 3,0 .3II0.D4LOT,COVERAGE, AL PROPOSEED.y� F. r,e.,3:..�5 SECTION BUILaNOPL KING CONY...ORS T.NO.: 1]350-]140-02 a 31 IOID]SETBACKS IIEOLIRED AT GRADE.N O! LEVEL GARAGE PLAN-NCR, TI3G0-]E5-H PROPOSED AT GRADE:NC. GI LEVEL GARAGE PLAN-SCR, Q ,]>se-E'I0 _ CONSULTANTS: W LEVEL GARAGE PLAN-NDR 12350-E110-06 PROPOSED PODVE�,K RI LEVEL FOSL LOOK RAN-BUILDING 030 A 4.2345 RI FLOOR FLAN- C Al 0 AA R2 LEVEL FLOOR PLAN-BUILDING A .31 wlas LANDSCAPING: D.NONE ARCHITECT: LEVEL FLOOR LEV FLAT'R PLAN-csLDSG e E PROPOSED.3000 EP AT RI LEVEL COURTYARDS A,-AARET ARCWITEDTS AI.R5 LEVEL FLOOR PLAN-BUILDIRG A C ATTACH. CD CC WOOD 62...•ROOF PLAN-BUILDING A OPE E LOUSY.REGA DESIGN GUIDELINESRIG WIT MD O s0..500 SF, WAY.EUIrE MI, -OOLONG e 0 PROPOEED,5]00 SF CONTACT.,COT?PARET A]Sb ROOF PLAN EULONG S A-u 3c aR6TIEEr PARRS. REGUIRED NOESECTION 6 BUILDING ELEVATIONS C '� a<,rarGAl®.3 ACCESSIBLE 5 FAR.EMAIL wp m Asa EFT ELE A DNS - •.5 VICINITY MAP PROPOSED RE6IDEN.1 ., A NOR 0. TOTAL RESIDENTIAL ED CIVIL ' ," '''....IWO PAR,ANO ROE,r °ID°RD P uwITA- w,ILLE HY NE SECTION D BUILDING SECTIONSO yl ACCExilxEr 35 5 _ F. _ - I TOTAL PAR,AND RIDE 6e CONT.,RAY MILLER CIVIL (^ ‘ RA.PROM..2. P1wE• - - CI PRELm+vnR-�.i_m PLAN ^ hid! -' Y FERVIa.E 9UfFACE m rEn,D TOTAL WILL DE RESIDENTIAL, a HAIL. •.y: Ae.: LANDSCAPE .� w.IDEn LEVEL PLANTS.PLAN V ExRT R LTI RI LEVEL PARTING RAN-SCUTw -�PROPOSED.Eo+ NAM MR, 0I: 9800133 e?] RI LEVEL PLANTING PLAN-NOR, j.,.,, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS: . CITY CONTACT SURVEY q - I -r .D N Fax TeE� a, - UNIT AREA SUMMARIES ▪ : OS/S51.2w DP�..PWDa R E s ---SS! RESIDENTIAL • .•ny..d 134Nsc0• _ �� 'S DNrt'RFBA .010 IDS AREA QR AREA TOTAL NOTE — •'• .. Y 503 Er D q»R. Nam SURVEYOR71 _ _ •..--__ ,BD ID m ,]! r I. CI, BUILDERS COwp1LTIIG 45 ...EYING _ IC 6E0I0 ,]5 SSE R ADDRESS AMR SE.WTw CT. WPC m/I ISA BA 1!S Sn,R 1a,b 002 NORTu S/IS WA »e.0 C roe .0 WO. R R),b ERR, m VAR � ---�•••••.: u� m/]m prrt puts I A A RI,b NI-1000 ` 'A1 m/1 m m ]�T e3 A.IR GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER . • CHIC TS I TS1E R ]ON 5ty1Sui.Y. .. CI, Dpilevaa.WA THE SITE , REDHRDAL,OLSL N aER CONTACT.MFKM..,,. _- I FLOOR AREA SUMMARIES : /1 •- PLOD! DESCRIPTION AREA NOTENAME CITYOF RENTON _ z - •••• 6i LEVEL GARAGE .OAAM PADRE: Sum A30-m 3 .er E..e 6]LEVEL REEIDI]OIAL S,0 .� GI LEVEL GARYIµ E». NAME: S /' Ar, . GI LEVEL ]0 PADRE 1 ` 5Y,ffiffi GI LEVEL RESIDENTIAL rNO,]35 E11S RESDENTI RILEVEL AL "AV o / / E -1 \ RESIDENTIAL R b LEVEL RESIDENTIAL 21.312 =/ e..•L bLEKL 213e SCR. F 6.1>A 1 POTS: 10/6/1259 887E PLAN APPROVAL JI IrT/V AO.1 Ac Cr.V', S��rn:++0l MOTT OFPIGE God' 1 AT 1 . 0 0. hh i ��o►oo \°oo� � I � _L� � f I,If u if s • . i! . , ii I, IT ir ff. • we. d > C_ 7 <I _,l it* }_1_='_ -°! .I ! I 11 1 a!I to `�-aq' spy, T OJ < ,- „„or, c 0,0 ''✓►sa'il —L --=I In 1 V' ��. ++ ////�� i./� .� —��_ _— - e:e1;�0�- ` �yi �. /ICJ C� `— l_._ ' , 4O!{�11A,2 ,:e7 = �rnp���_ O(A` pnTn\ I� I 'Ali 1 a INS' Key s4Nntr1 Nam. common None Pty. sire Ke Scientific Nam. common Nam. OSy. Sae Inn GSA_ i t I I��-_`7.v.L 1, Trees Y CU Rhododendron: °� Cl __ .. ..-._ - __.___ • I'�//' -- don...o.cr.. o..N:n.Ki cwnw 00 sa nt «[" a> `'t"' cp.a.nm,da donne Emt.n Daa..oa m 10-1r m 40 Imabelax c.9.e Te e..Te Cod. 00 c 2e Maw e Oa I off+ , RMoroa.,aan'Ch. a Coro. m 2.hue. (/1 E �., �N / oo.aY.,.a.oato o..•T. m 8-7 t C 51....o-.n Room.• w.�om Cho. m lo-z.•nu.a. / O pi p0/t I�,�,, +tg f� c.aeonw.m''",,,m Km...T. m rr nc C.eoe..en.eon firer aP.Saw Coo.. m lo-u Muse _ YI�t l �t lrsl_ Pm...c Weser' Nmoet r1•.r.R.en m e-r ht o00.0 0 o RD....E..1.HOW Elamem NaCC.Mo.. m 61i hue. T Z ��. I,/, `� Stec:im 5e, boa..an..�Y CO 5-01 nt eno dentrm Jut' Jo.Rho., �t m 15-z.•hoer }JR{i •( 'J ' Prune.w 9.. oMt [ts.v.. 00 61V to gharoy.�yon P.1u' PlY RneCe 00 16N•h_a p 07:-1 Ire.,, \ •o.o r:+ .Ia,r.e.Yel. 00 e-IS ht.ere 1 w,oem.�eo.bon.=u.a.Ymtwr Hon...Y a. .v..Caa. m fez.•my... p 9 � ," to.Pdrnae.n N Japan.Ym1w wield ran 00 o-Kr Ill Q.'°'}0 Rrom4M5 Deem haw oow2 lout Ruch m a-2.-nuee, V �� I V ,�Pa«ow,. ,��wePY.w.qY ti m o-a m o o Ceaw,.an Rob. ev,�aw Wade m rs-1s•nr�r mn.d.dMm SmnN SOP.Cade m 12-15"hypo Shrubs: Cododn..Tor.S1.nor woof.So..0*H..50 m u-2e-Law 1 p.. /• i/ M b. onto st.a.e..r Sum m .D0• � e noe.awm Oe 0*04l eYv CYn.dnmt Veto wtoea 00 O-2.'hum, a`1'' 11'•J � Irk" M�a robe•cemeecte Como,,,,Aecy,,,amen m 5 od�t c •eloa.n.on'Jon or♦ Jon Deena Pow . m »3c•nu•er $ t—. � � • r ern...t...a.s.nee doom T �..d m sad Del Caaaa.,.r,'a.n.no.Seer Ceretma.on..Code. m 12-1 nua . ..,. , •,. .WLeetre o o Some. E. 5 oa Sant ' 10.. .m Stolet Won... scent.ma.mode 00 12 15•Miter : yr 'el ... Petntea f.UttWa DoK m 5 ad centfil Cnroemenon Sou..Iv C.Stoner Swa.C.Sloop.Caae 00 16N•h.. Menu comae0 Wean Doer 1,.m4,Saar••fie .s...m m sad cant ()SAD Nw4W.1.on 0do.Yammer Ye.Xemr Cede 00 162 Myer ••Ln'd.`o . Sem*i.none Cornoact Skimno 00 m- 00o Iendoa.,trm°.a Anntw Oea Amp.Cede. 00 t2.er Myer LL :.•I%~, 5.e....toed.. n.coco,10 m 5 ma ob. ° Co.ro.Wrm Wndl.u.• ebroee.Code 00 10-;r'Memo i c• v6m,..roaa0 Da,;e'.v,.0,�, N Q Rha lea 'Anna Ro..mdm.y Mho Ro..wnro,.v Cove 00 563e'Myer J a�e±� .RmY so a Ra walmre.m 5 r Azalea: — F. •�eb tic.nadb Hdiwacr s.wtnre m ed Amite 1Nn.9re Ituvn•.1. m I2-IY'h1400 C WV. _„c.,1..,.rn SI 4 e** coati ae•.,a. More,ree,NAM Azalea CO 12-15••hum 2 1 • Arena sa45ara n m 5 gal am CtIDa Azaw E.... Own Dee nprb Az* m 12-15'•h.. o 0o n«..,ma A.e.P.P-Seefde Denvoote Redo SVn,d.Como Azalea 00 12-15''h14p i g 0 o o C .arean,de 00 2 d•y,� �� AaWe flee 9,a' 41wn.00d X10rN 00 1a Is"Hl4 7,4v D...Demo 00 2 ad®t Azdm waireno Sea C.dro.,2 H20.1 2 n.4 m m 12-Is"n 4p_ d QY'b e...b L as boo' CO a ad w,1 Ardea Story Goonnoca 11 .4 m 12-15'n1d•p b' _De.OaS�. &u•• an.. °"°" 00 5 ad An.mob.. .. COOo.dran nd'wmm W 1215'kb.e e'a'"'••m.m Da.1 done vn. 00 r2e•.us Goundcover F' 1 I •ArclwtoP•yo.ado Klnb.nnick 1 yd,2 •NOTE- fuwaa.aa TO 01111R THROUGHOUT ALL BEDS AT 1120.0. nro 10/011M SITE PLAN � APPROVAL 1 gale o pu /T,� sf I „ y SCALE I/5" = I' // \ lei ......•....fir,.Mom.Ilk MN 0ee01-r NORTH 99017 2 0 a r ri AI 1 04°, • ow env oen. WI . . T 4. lath. . i . . . i I . • I IIre 1 Elia': I � R o 50 as�d -. -_ .oa ,fr R0 • • 1 } Iase1 -- _ U - • t li ^ n , Fes--- --I '�< 8, J 2IF •p 0� 4 416 1) p© boa` / a r s O �A ••. - I•:�'1d2-011.440 _. r'.. ,I 8-all (,I•' c tom: / • • ooEic. "`LL.$LL1� �'A �!'� •_ Ike I . • © g aaC rI p 1404i p.I.iç1tø © 0 __ • 1 • �.' _O �O w 'PIA PR , 01 D_4{1)V '\ / Ro Alb ©,,, am Wb , ' Key xRPtNk N . Ca.Pnen N . are S• Key 'I"'Na.M Ca..Name a. Size J o Trees Rhododendron: Ghame...e.a Cr.. 9.2...1..ti.• W 64 m 6 M odoa..aen.M..TN' two 1 Mmo. 00 a}2."Step �, eves A.Ent.Os..eM W PTV m ':a Is.a0en>m Ghlen/ .aa R1ee0> 00 •-2 n..o. 1,,�+■% 0ock n.MOwata O..T. W YQ M C7�' MwOeO.Nm'P✓°�oN.I Obab�MaOo. m IF31"M.a G...E Dock...men�.en .......r W 4T M . M.eoOn.en ile.9...I 00•Biw M.Oa CO I-IT nl.or ,�>�, 1 Ilipm. seem Roan.oan' Nam..M�ma�.Pl. W 0.00 M,.me.,n,�,cll sewn MAP. eb.e.0 Hoe... 00 rl2-m.�. / \ • � n.... +�� m R%Yb Mwam.wm'Jar' ..a Rt.. 00 A42.•nNp `/ ..R r ^.� •8.e tell r�.�y�M. m 4q M M.a0n.r P.JY.' P.LY.Mwa. W M-2."Sle.. ■ Aw sac+maan ....Ay.. m .q M.Y Q'Rh Moaa..en H..A.v�Yea.lategi.' Hen.J.L C...en..Rh* CO 10-2Y'St.o. A0.P.•m..n ee.ww II...wMl.teen m Fq M. I Maa.4M1 Ctwen La.. Oo.en tdr Rno0o. CO 163."nteor o Q A..poMMu. A}ww...1.4 vpl..rN W Fq M Rs*Panmo' Rennie M.O.. CO 12-IS•Step Shrubs: aaea...m Son. SAPS. Mwao. W 12-IS"nt.w. g• e M4o0..1m Pee.,...5 Rev.Spatlw Mae. CO W3,Step r 1Tti ANatw ..o SIE*Ir Y W mar � McaeaMon q.n.drnl MS. 01 02.00 5 YTit•Moan 00 M-N"St.or `J POO .maw aw....'c..wacte. r t........ 00 S es rent Q7213 Meaoa.,e.,'Ain Ort.M Jan Den..Rhea 00 30-De"Step , p,9 Pt..lance..'Otto W�l.Y err twee. 00 e-wed Mo...1 00.1.1.c.� O..t....Mea, 00 M-2v'Stec. • 33 (e(e . can.Ye•'a... are.C.d. 00 5 r cent � A1.1..nbcn Sw..t Pena. sw...Pena.Mwe 00 12-15"n4p CSO• Potent.. f. !Pus Deaf N.Mw.birth,am 0000 p W Gent RA YMw.1101 Yea.Hann. ode. 0 Pao.RSede. 000 1*.-z."n .I .1t.eM.l Pww Rho...00 13. O 0 Rhom De at e.m. Dee NA..RSA. 00 12-Ie•h.. o �ea� .ao.0000..aa..e .... m S..nit 0000 Modoa.n.on'ena.vn' W.a...n Rhodo. 00 MN'nt.or T _ VY....n us— gp M-2.• Q Maa.a.n*0 Anna Raw lattn.Y Ana Roe.MIN..Rh.. W 50-3O'MA. // . wa...... 'a:...P err _ Azalea: boy b`1 ` w.arwl .�..lr.o WO N•ww a. Ream Ado CO 12-5'Mop MR 00 a co,* �.t a�ow. ES 4 0."e.,' Arra�, t..ma.r WAS�..z lard Awe. 00 a-u"Step SCALE I/5" I' 10/0e. IV ..f.a.aW... W.ea a. _ ADA1.e Ever. 01.n 0!•BOR.Awo 00 i2-15'Md o o„go .. CO 5 ee e.a •NIAD ••Y••q•W Se..gm.. 14...}..,a.Do...Aww CO 12-r 11UI� SITE PLAN W 2 w... Aww Pow ee0 Dr.aa.N.5 4 Aww 00 Ix-e'Mep NORTH APPROVAL a.n.a�pe� .s` 00 2 ea®t Aw.e t...y me R-.. _ m.aalwn. W 12-Ie•my. 9o...t Pr Ow' .r err• m 2 m wet WO Aww S..Y .wre.a M..N Aww CO 12-LY SUB, plop P..U... ...y W S..ma .� Aww..... 111...rat lam 00 fx-1S•Meer. •<••q• Owl 1.PIP DO 1.x NM GroUnd0over 5;; L�1 R 1 . . I I •A.e...y.,Y..w ar R.im:..0 W 1.a x.. •MOM q..OMOIX TO 4Da.THROUGHOUT ALL BEDS AT CRC 99017 E] El EE1 El El ® ® ® ® ® ®. .Ea 19-SW unmuunnnlmuuuuuumnuun nn mm�uuumuuunlnuunnnul10111110101111111111111011111111111111111111010110111011 o1111101111111111111111111111111111111111 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 = cu O 1 C 1 EAST ELEVATION — BUILDING 'A' = cr.S ..O ,/,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,t,,,,_,,,,./61.111661, — \\ rC — — — / 1 — ei-0 • U) flT- -fFr I—I + I— — .otin • ® ® ® i 1 l El El II 1 .i, ! — ., MIL� 1 1 NMQQ, ® El ® ER ® ®® 1616 iC IPrtL � Ifi �S 1 R Id L �m IM. 1)1-1 4,frLL 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111rz • „ IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1IIIIIIIIIIIII11111111111 , = . 9 F SITE PLAN �,E,�L 9 APPROVAL EAST ELEVATION — BUILDING 'A' _ A5.2 aeon - NM 114N4 // 11.WOO - TO PLATE ❑ El DI El El El n _,....... 8 A — L1 H _ CC • NORTH ELEVATION - BUILDING 'A' as MEM,SWAT. F.L.OP / // ''' ® NM MRS WS z m riE .�. n emu_ .� ® El El ® ® OE s .,.,. _,,,,___......... -. if: . : d; 0 E.s.w,. �.�GII U. I MOE WV.. �, ��A BITE PLAN _ - LEVEL APPROVAL NORTH ELEVATION - BUILDING 'B' A5.3 99017 V �� ' , '` \/,. ' MIMMIN ' rue Atvikooto -<••• , t ' •,:* 1%0.! ,ua• girrag a p.,:--1\ 1 i‘h.,4 1411.1 !i `' ' II ql‘tit" 'Y 's'allif111101 hgk 1 i.1-i-V.; : 7, I ‘V":. ' .�:- -—I. ® J- ocic, NOIN32I0411 a r4.. •�i��',i;!.,i „!U� !Lt a ��i 1 w ; ,i. 4--- _ _�o 4, •t‘ . .. ._,.:. . . i 1,. arm in. lai' MIN i 4 , . , Li.... .\--,„ . .. „,... , 4, lip. .,, fli :' w ii 41:1' 1: 1 . J;,P.. '"" ligiiinv .•........... .11_ .... . &Liu Mat -: -.4mtg- ‘: 1:PrAIAPAR! M mt. Iiiiiiiii A��� 'L Rent. • 73.1.: \ .-, ,,,144,,,1111 mow ilia ... m-7— 41111.-71--.64 --""."-- 4 t y� '= w~,r WSJtI41 ` rr 0 . (NO a �� �./-,1 suso 5e T' HH - I`f•I Northrn Santa Fe Burlington CITY OF RENTON RENTON CITY 1700 E Golf Rd#400 200 Mill Ave S 233 Burnett Ave S Schaumburg,IL 60173 Renton,WA 98055 Renton,WA 98055 Alvin John Yokel Thomas Williams WASHINGTON MUTUAL SAVGI 30925 Webster Rd E 13329 SE 253Rd PI 1191 2Nd Ave#950 Eatonville,WA 98328 Kent,WA 98042 Seattle,WA 98101 WASHINGTON MUTUAL SAVIN Jerry&Janice King William Duff 1191 2Nd Ave#950 31620 176Th Ave SE 308 Washington Ave Seattle,WA 98101 Auburn,WA 98092 . Mukilteo,WA 98275 Kenneth Imel&Garnet Templin-Imel PORCELLO BLDG SUPER SHOPS INC 306 Williams Ave S 1817 Jones Ave NE PO Box 8457 Renton,WA 98055 Renton,WA 98056 San Bernardino,CA 92412 James Rosa Tuyenl Pham&Bao Ngoc Nguyen CUGINI LAND&TIMBER CO 2724 Benson Rd S 1000 N 33Rd St PO Box 359 Renton,WA 98055 Renton,WA 98056 Renton, WA 98057 REBECCA'S FOOD ENTERPRISE Robert&Beverly Delancey Robert Delancey 808 S 3Rd St 8464 Island Dr S 8464 Island Dr S Renton,WA 98055 Seattle,WA 98118 Seattle,WA 98118 Mrs.Umberto Barei CDE PARTNERSHIP FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS&L 322 S 15Th St 217 Wells Ave S PO Box 360 Renton,WA 98055 Renton,WA 98055 Renton,WA 98057 FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS&LO C L Custer BELMONDO FAMILY LIMITED POBox358 PO Box 358 1835NE12ThSt Renton,WA 98057 Renton,WA 98057 Renton,WA 98056 U S BANK OF WASHINGTON Alex Cugini Jr. Roger Gavin 2800 E Lake St#Lake00 611 Renton Ave S 700 S 3Rd St#896 Minneapolis,MN 55406 Renton,WA 98055 Renton,WA 98055 Jerome Alan Kavesh REN FOUR INC U S WEST INC 6526 153Rd Ave SE PO Box 59 6300 S Syracuse Way#700 Bellevue,WA 98006 Renton,WA 98057 Englewood,CO 80111 US WEST INC LB RENTON PARTNERSHIP BANK OF AMERICA NT&SA 6300 S Syracuse Way 212 Wells Ave S#A PO Box 37000 Englewood,CO 80111 Renton,WA 98055 San Francisco,CA 94137 RENTON COMMERCE CENTER GOOD PARTNERSHIP PO Box 1113 613 S 3Rd St#A Renton,WA 98057 Renton,WA 98055 REN-FOUR, INC. DIRECTORS: 229 WILLIAMS AVE. SO. ADMINISTRATOR: PAUL W.HOUSER.SR. P.O. BOX 59 DIANE M.DOBSON WYMAN K. DOBSON RENTON, WASHINGTON 98057-0059 DAVID T.DOBSON (425) 255-8641 CITY OF RENTON FAX (425) 228-0288 AUG 2 9 2001 ECEVED CITY C ERK� OFFICE August 24, 2001 Neil Watts, Director Development Services Division City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton WA 98055 Via Facsimile @ (425) 430-7300 Re: Metropolitan Place (Sheridan Mixed Use Project), LUA99-141 Alley Usage Dear Mr. Watts I am in receipt of your July 9, 2001, letter and thank you for the prompt reply to my previous letter. However, we have outstanding concerns which have not been addressed by the City and which we ask for immediate attention to. 1. JOINT MEETING: In your letter you indicate our firm, as well as the other corresponding property owners were invited to a joint meeting regarding the alley easement. We received no such invitation from the City. The meeting you had with Jerry Kavesch of Renton Western Wear was brought to our attention my Mr. Kavesch. After speaking to Mr. Kavesch regarding our concerns of the alley usage, he indicated he had a meeting scheduled during the last week of April. It was our understanding from Mr. Kavesch that each individual property owner along the alley-right-of-way would be invited to a separate meeting and no joint meeting was currently scheduled. He mentioned the possibility of our attending his meeting which was not a possibility due to conflicting schedules (his meeting was within a few days of our speaking and we already had appointments set). The request for a joint meeting has never been dealt with. 2. CORRESPONDENCE and RELATED INFORMATION: On February 2, 2000, we made request to Peter Rose for Notice of all proceedings in this matter be mailed to us. There have been a number of items which we have seen 2nd hand which never were forwarded to us. We would like to know how we were excluded from the loop of communication. On April 19, 2001, • &c ed•-u u.do e. ThA-r"-4-44-0 (F) Wyman Dobson of Ren Four mailed you correspondence which never received direct response to it. I received a partial response in your recent letter, but not all issues of Mr. Dobson's were addressed. As Mr. Dobson's April 19th letter pointed out, when this project first started, we were completely left out of the loop. As we believe USWest (now QWest) was as well. When ultimately contacted after some verbal agreements had been reached between part of the parties, we agreed to cooperate but expected to be totally informed of all proceedings subsequent thereto. We are once again being left out of the loop. 3. EXPIRATION OF EASEMENT: We do not understand how the City of Renton can unilaterally extend the easement use of the alley without our permission and the permission of the other adjacent property owners who executed the initial temporary easement. The easement by it's terms, has clearly expired back in April of this year and the city unilaterally has no right to extend it. It was our understanding that at the individual meeting with Mr. Kavesch, discussions were made for extension of easement paperwork to be drawn up. However, it is going on four months since that meeting and neither Mr. Kavesch or any of us here at Ren Four have seen any paperwork nor heard any further information regarding the extension of this easement. 4. DAMAGE TO PARKING AREA: In your letter, you indicate the following: "In reviewing Mr. Dobson's letter, he expressed concern related to the condition of pavement behind the Ren-Four Building, which was not scheduled for replacement by the Metropolitan Place contractor. Photographs taken prior to the commencement of construction activities for the Metropolitan Place project indicate preexisting damage to the concrete pavement in the alley behind the Ren-Four Building. • Regardless, it is now our understanding that Dally Homes has agreed to repave the entire alley." However, in speaking with both the project manager as well as the sight manager for this Metropolitan Place Development, they both acknowledge damage was done to our parking area during this construction and development. I would hope in the future you would check with the parties involved before rendering your opinion on damage as a "picture proof fact" that the damage was not caused by the construction and development - especially when the two managers have already indicated they knew about the damage being their responsibility. Regarding the damaged areas, there is an area which has had paving placed over it (within the past month) which the two managers indicate was previously depressed but obviously "broken" during this project. There is an additional area which did not have any paving done to it toward the southerly end of our parking area which is depressed which the sight manager indicates was probably done when a crane was parked in our back parking area and set up for the unloading of equipment from that area. When discussions were first approached regarding the granting of an easement, the alley right-of-way and private parking areas for Ren Four as well as Renton Western Wear were never differentiated. During these discussions, Daily Construction agreed to repave the "entire alleyway." It isn't until the time has come to undertake the repaving of the alley that the City and Daily Construction have changed their tune to differentiate between the alley as alley right-of-way and alley private parking. We were under the impression the entire alley would be repaved - including the private parking which has been used for alley right-of-way during the construction of this project and has excessive wear and tear as well as damage due to the granting of this easement. We would request that, especially considering the damage done to our private parking area because of this construction and easement, that the entire parking area be repaved. 5. OFF SITE PARKING. We just received notice from Daily Homes (see copy of letter attached) that they will not be paying for our parking across the street after 08-31-01, yet in the same letter they indicate the alley won't be paved until some time in September. What part of the alley are they talking about -- the original alley, the easement for the alley or the alley and private parking area? How can they discontinue our off site parking until the paving is completed? It is our opinion that we have been more than patient with the city and Dally construction during this Metropolitan Place development. We are all for the responsible development and growth for the City of Renton. However, we feel as a small business owner we have been taken advantage of in this matter. We have put up with continuous blockage of our parking area, construction equipment using our parking area for the development and construction, damage to our vehicles from construction materials not properly removed from the alleyway, not to mention or list the number of times our power and phone lines have been knocked out of commission due to the construction. We concur in Renton Western Wear's request for a joint meeting and their concerns regarding the continued use of the right-of-way and the condition of the right-of-way. We also ask for clarification of the intent of repaving the alley. Very truly yours REN FOUR, INC. Diane M. Dobson-Rebar Enclosure(s) cc: Renton City Council Kathy Keolker-Wheeler Dan Clawson Mayor Jesse Tanner Jerry Kavesch, Renton Western Wear II • y." CITY _)F RENTON mil $" .P Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator July 9, 2001 Ms. Diane M. Dobson-Rebar Ren-Four, Inc. P.O. Box 50 Renton, WA 98057 Re: Metropolitan Place (Sheridan Mixed Use Project) LUA99-141 Dear Ms. Dobson-Rebar We have received a copy of your letter dated July 9, 2001. In order to respond to the concerns expressed in Mr. Wyman Dobson's letter of April 19, 2001, a meeting was held to which all owners of property along the alley between South 2nd and South 3rd Streets and Burnett and Williams Avenue South were invited. Our understanding was that Mr. Jerry Kavesh spoke with Mr. Dobson, who could not attend the May 1st meeting. Topics of discussion at the meeting included extension of the easement agreement, construction scheduling, and repaving of the alley. In reviewing Mr. Dobson's letter, he expresses concern related to the condition of pavement behind the Ren-Four Building, which was not scheduled for replacement by the Metropolitan Place contractor. Photographs taken prior to the commencement of construction activities for the Metropolitan Place project indicate preexisting damage to the concrete pavement in the alley behind the Ren-Four Building. Regardless, it is now our understanding that Daily Homes has agreed to repave the entire alley. Preliminary paving was to take place starting today. Final repaving will not take place until construction of the Metropolitan Place building has been completed. If this issue is of continuing concern, please contact the project planner, Elizabeth Higgins, at 425-430-7382. You may contact Mrs. Higgins if you, or Mr. Dobson, have other concerns related to this project. Sincerely 1\le4(2/0 Neil Watts, Director Development Services Division 4I1tp 901 2001 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 0' ca Cyr,+,...,11 • • • • • tl ilb Utlt 22,2C, 1 Mr.Wyman Dobson Ren-Four Inc. <PO Box 59 Renton:WA 98055 RE:Daily Homes construction impact;alternate parking. Dear Mr. Dobson, Please be informed that effective August 31st we will no longer provide alternate parking for your -firm at the Midtown Building as we have during these last several months while construction activities were underway. We will be paving in the alley in early September and upon completion of this activity access through the alley will return to a more normal level. We thank you for your patience and cooperation. Sincerely, Jim Schmidt Project Manager Daily Homes Inc. jas • July 16,2001 Renton City Council Minutes Page 234 Vacation: Timing of Street Councilwoman Keolker-Wheeler discussed the necessity for a final decision on Vacation Decision&Related a street vacation being made prior to the required public hearing on the related Land Use Action,Code land use proposal. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY KEOLKER- Revisions WHEELER, COUNCIL REFER MATTER TO COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE. CARRIED. Citizen Comment: Dobson- Councilwoman Keolker-Wheeler requested that Administration respond to a Rebar—Renton Western Wear letter dated July 9, 2001, from Diane M. Dobson-Rebar,REN-FOUR,Inc.,PO Alley Status(Sheridan Mixed Box 59, Renton, 98057,regarding the status of the alley adjacent to Renton Use Development) Western Wear between S. 2nd and S. 3rd Streets. Community Services: Public MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER,COUNCIL Address System Improvements REFER MATTER OF PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS AT CITY FACILITIES, INCLUDING THE USE OF PORTABLE MICROPHONE IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS, TO THE COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE. CARRIED. King County: Jail Contract Councilwoman Keolker-Wheeler requested a status report on the jail contract negotiations with King County. Chief Administrative Office Covington reported that Police Chief Anderson is a member of the jail negotiation team and stated that reports would be presented to Council during the next informal Committee of the Whole. Councilman Persson encouraged the City to investigate the possibility of charging King County when Renton holds its prisoners as King County does when it holds Renton prisoners. Legislature: Legislative Responding to Councilwoman Keolker-Wheeler's inquiry regarding the City's Districts Redistricting in position on the redistricting of legislative districts, Chief Administrative Officer Renton(from 6 to 3) Jay Covington said that after Council discussion of the matter in March, it was decided that the City should encourage the Washington State Redistricting Commission to consider reducing the number of legislative districts in Renton from six to three. He reported that a letter stating that position was sent to the Redistricting Commission, and a joint letter urging the Commission to consider the reduction of districts to be signed by the City, Renton School District, Renton Technical College,Valley Medical Center and the Greater Renton Chamber of Commerce is being drafted. Mr. Covington reported that Mayor Tanner and Economic Development Administrator Sue Carlson were planning on attending the August 2nd meeting on the matter, and he noted that the letter would be completed in time for the meeting. Mayor Pro Tern Clawson said he would also be available to attend the meeting. Finance Committee Announcing a potential conflict of interest on the next item, Councilwoman Human Resources: Keolker-Wheeler excused herself from the meeting. Time: 8:42 p.m. Administrator Positions Finance Committee Chair Parker presented a report regarding the compensation Reclassification study for Department Administrators. The Finance Committee recommended concurrence in the staff recommendation to approve the reclassifications of the Administrator positions. If approved,the following positions will be reclassified from grade m43 to grade m49. Effective July 1, 2001,the Administrator positions will be placed in salary grade m49 with a monthly salary range of$7,610-$9,273. Current incumbents Susan Carlson, Economic Development Administrator; Victoria Runkle, Finance&Information Services Administrator; James Shepherd, Community Services Administrator; Michael •:: CITi JF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator July 9, 2001 RECEIVED Ms. Diane M. Dobson-Rebar JUL 1 1 2001 Ren-Four, Inc. MAYORS OFFICE P.O. Box 50 Renton, WA 98057 Re: Metropolitan Place (Sheridan Mixed Use Project) LUA99-141 Dear Ms. Dobson-Rebar We have received a copy of your letter dated July 9, 2001. In order to respond to the concerns expressed in Mr. Wyman Dobson's letter of April 19, 2001, a meeting was held to which all owners of property along the alley between South 2nd and South 3rd Streets and Burnett and Williams Avenue South were invited. Our understanding was that Mr. Jerry Kavesh spoke with Mr. Dobson, who could not attend the May 1st meeting. Topics of discussion at the meeting included extension of the easement agreement, construction scheduling, and repaving of the alley. In reviewing Mr. Dobson's letter, he expresses concern related to the condition of pavement behind the Ren-Four Building, which was not scheduled for replacement by the Metropolitan Place contractor. Photographs taken prior to the commencement of construction activities for the Metropolitan Place project indicate preexisting damage to the concrete pavement in the alley behind the Ren-Four Building. Regardless, it is now our understanding that Daily Homes has agreed to repave the entire alley. Preliminary paving was to take place starting today. Final repaving will not take place until construction of the Metropolitan Place building has been completed. If this issue is of continuing concern, please contact the project planner, Elizabeth Higgins, at 425-430-7382. You may contact Mrs. Higgins if you, or Mr. Dobson, have other concerns related to this project. Sincerely lje4,0 Neil Watts, Director Development Services Division 1901 e-2001 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 a)This paper contains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer • REN-FOUR, INC. DIRECTORS: 229 WILLIAMS AVE. SO. ADMINISTRATOR: PAUL W.HOUSER,SR. P.O. BOX 59 DIANE M.DOBSON WYMAN K. DOBSO ������ RENTON, WASHINGTON 98057-0059 DAVID T.Do (425) 255-8641 FAX (425) 228-0288 JUL 1 1 2001 REHTONC1TYtIL. CC) July 9, 2001 Neil Watts, Director Development Services Division City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton WA 98055 Via Facsimile @ (425) 430-7300 Re: Metropolitan Place (Sheridan Mixed Use Project), LUA99-141 Alley Usage Dear Mr. Watts On April 19, 2001, we wrote to you (a copy of that correspondence is enclosed for your reference) and have yet to receive a response back. Will you kindly advise us when we can expect to receive a reply to this letter. Very truly yours REN FOUR, C. fP • Diane M. Do son-Re ar Enclosure(s) April 19, 2001 Neil Watts, Director Development Services Division City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton WA 98055 Re: Metropolitan Place (Sheridan Mixed Use Project), LUA99-141 Alley Usage Dear Mr. Watts Thanks to Jerry Kavesh, from Renton Western Wear, we received a copy of some recent correspondence relating to the use of the alley right-of-way. We are astonished regarding two aspects of the correspondence. First, we don't understand why a copy of all recent correspondence was not sent to us. By way of a letter to Peter Rose on February 2, 2000, we requested that Notice of all proceedings in this matter be mailed to us. Secondly, we do not understand how the City of Renton can unilaterally extend the easement use of the alley without our permission and the permission of the other adjacent property owners who executed the initial temporary easement. The easement by it's terms, has clearly expired and the city unilaterally has no right to extend it. When this project first started, we were completely left out of the loop. As we believe USWest (now QWest) was as well. When ultimately contacted after some verbal agreements had been reached between part of the parties, we agreed to cooperate but expected to be totally informed of all proceedings subsequent thereto. We are once again being left out of the loop. We concur in Renton Western Wear's request for a meeting and their concerns regarding the continued use of the right-of-way and the condition of the right-of-way. We also have some personal concerns concerning the parking area to the rear of our building which has been used by heavy equipment during the construction period which has resulted in damage to our parking area. Very truly yours REN FOUR, INC. Wym n K. Dobson, Director P.S. I personally have picked up several nails in the alleyway to the rear of our building which are outside of the fenced area, which I presume came from the Dally Homes Construction site. cc: Kathy Koelker-Wheeler, City Council Dan Clawson, Council President Mayor Jesse Tanner Jerry Kavesh, Renton Western Wear June 11,2001 7_ Renton City Council Minutes Page 184 matter of how the mitigation money associated with the agreement will be used to the Transportation Committee. MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER,COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. (See page 182 for Transportation Committee report regarding usage of mitigation money.) Planning&Development Planning&Development Committee Chair Keolker-Wheeler presented a report Committee regarding the Aegis Development Agreement. In the 2000 Comprehensive Plan Planning: Development amendment cycle,a Land Use Map amendment and rezone were approved for Agreement Changes,Aegis one parcel, subject to the conditions of a Development Agreement between the Capital International&T and City,the property owner,and a developer. The Development Agreement E Investment specified allowed uses, self-storage and office,and special development regulations applicable to development of the site. The Development Agreement also included a conceptual site design. Consistency with this conceptual site design is required for approval of site development proposals. The formal application for development diverged in several ways from the schematic designs included in the Development Agreement. After review of those proposed changes,the Committee found consistency between the current proposal and the Development Agreement approved by the Council. Therefore, no Council action is necessary to amend the Development Agreement. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Council: Pavilion Building& Councilwoman Keolker-Wheeler requested status reports on the following Renton Western Wear Alley items: repairs to the pavilion building,and use of the alley by Dally Homes Status Report Request adjacent to Renton Western Wear. ORDINANCES AND The following resolutions were presented for reading and adoption: RESOLUTIONS Resolution#3508 A resolution was read authorizing temporary street closures at Houser Way S. Public Works: Eastside and Morris Ave. S.,Houser Way S. and Burnett Ave. S., and Morris Ave. S. at Interceptor Project, Street S. 7th St. for the installation of 72-inch diameter pipe for the King County Closures Eastside Interceptor Restoration project. MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution#3509 A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into an Transportation: SW 7th St& interlocal cooperative agreement with the Washington State Department of Lind Ave SW Traffic Signal Transportation(WSDOT) for grant funding to install a traffic signal at SW 7th Design&Construction, St. and Lind Ave. SW. MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY NELSON, WSDOT Grant COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution#3510 A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into a local Transportation: East Valley Rd agency agreement supplement with the Washington State Department of Rehabilitation,WSDOT Grant Transportation(WSDOT) for additional grant funding for the East Valley Rd. rehabilitation. MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY KEOLKER- WHEELER,COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. The following ordinance was presented for second and final reading and adoption: June 11,2001 Renton City Council Minutes ( Page 183 1 study the intersection of S.4th St. and Burnett Ave. S. for possible improvements. 2. Metro mitigation funds in the amount of$325,000 to be placed in the Street Overlay account to be used to reconstruct Lind Ave. SW from SW 43rd to SW 21st Streets. 3. Funds in the amount of$325,000 be transferred from reserve fund #502.000000.005.5140.0070.04.000000 to contingency fund account titled Reserved for South Renton Project. 4. Metro mitigation funds in the amount of$60,000 be placed in the Reserved for South Renton Project fund. MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Public Works: Eastside Transportation Committee Chair Persson presented a report regarding the Interceptor Project, Street Eastside Interceptor Project traffic control and street closures. King County Closures Metro will be installing approximately 1,800 feet of 72-inch pipe in the area of Houser Way S.,Burnett Ave. S., and Morris Ave. S. The contractor will begin mobilization October 2001, and construction is scheduled to begin approximately January 2002 with completion anticipated by November 2002. The project will take approximately fourteen months to complete. Street closures will include the intersections at Houser Way S. and Morris Ave. S.,Houser Way S. and Burnett Ave. S., and Morris Ave. S. at S. 7th St. The intersection at Houser Way S. and Morris Ave. S. will be closed in or about January 2002 for nine months. The intersection at Burnett Ave. S. and Houser Way S. will be closed in or about April 2002 for four months and Morris Ave. S. and S. 7th St. will be closed in or about April 2002 for five months. S. 7th St.will be open to the public only on weekdays from 5:30 a.m.to 8:00 a.m., westbound and 3:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.,eastbound. Additional angle parking will be provided on a temporary basis along the west side of Moms Ave. S. between S. 6th St. and S. 7th St. during the closure of Morris Ave. S. The Transportation Committee recommended the following: approving the requested street closures at the intersections at Houser Way S. and Morris Ave. S., Houser Way S. and Burnett Ave. S., and Morris Ave. S. at S. 7th St.; temporary parking at Morris Ave. S. and S. 7th St.; and adopting the resolution authorizing the temporary street closures. The Committee further recommended that the contractor provide ten days advance warning by posting large signs along the travel route advising of the closure and detour routes,that emergency and pedestrian access be maintained at all times,and the approved traffic control plan be implemented and maintained by the contractor to the satisfaction of the Transportation and Development Services Divisions. MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER,COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. (See page 184 for resolution.) Utilities Committee Utilities Committee Chair Briere presented a report concurring with the staff Public Works: Eastside recommendation that the Memorandum of Agreement by and between the City Interceptor Project, Memo of and King County for the Eastside Interceptor(ESI) Section 1 Capacity Agreement with King County Restoration Project be approved by the City Council and that the Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the agreement and adopt the resolution regarding this matter. The Utilities Committee has referred the April 23,2001 Renton City Council Minutes Page 134 Mitigation Fund will be used to cover the cost of this position for the duration of the project. MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY NELSON,COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Finance: Vouchers Finance Committee Chair Parker presented a report recommending approval of Claim Vouchers 191986— 192406 and two wire transfers totaling $1,939,809.09; and approval of Payroll Vouchers 31010—31235 and 534 direct deposits totaling$1,010,743.43. MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY NELSON,COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Utilities Committee Utilities Committee Chair Briere presented a report recommending concurrence CAG: 01-024,Water Well in the staff recommendation that Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to EW-3 Replacement,Prospect execute the contract with Prospect Construction, Inc. in the amount of Construction Inc $814,719.42 for the construction of the Replacement of Water Well EW-3 project. The Committee further recommended that the additional $400,000 needed to complete the project be funded through a utility bond issue scheduled for issuance this year. MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY KEOLKER- WHEELER,COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. ORDINANCES AND The following resolutions were presented for reading and adoption: RESOLUTIONS Resolution#3502 A resolution was read supporting the County-wide Emergency Medical King County: Emergency Services(EMS)levy—2002 to 2007 (Medic One). MOVED BY CLAWSON, Medical Services(EMS)Levy SECONDED BY CORMAN,COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution#3503 A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into a Transportation: Logan Ave local agency agreement for the design and subsequent phases of the Logan Ave. Bridge Seismic Retrofit, Bridge Seismic Retrofit. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY WSDOT Grant NELSON, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS Councilwoman Keolker-Wheeler reported receipt of a letter from Jerry Kavesh, Development Services: Renton Western Wear, 724 S. 3rd St.,Renton, 98055,regarding the condition Sheridan Mixed-Use of the alley in use during the construction of the Sheridan mixed use Development in Downtown& development(SA-99-141). She requested that the Administration investigate Alley Closure the status of the alley and report back to Council. Council: Training Session in Councilwoman Keolker-Wheeler announced that she has been asked by the SE Africa(Keolker-Wheeler) State Department to train women in South East Africa to be more effective in local government. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL ADJOURN. CARRIED. Time: 10:10 p.m. MARIL J. TERSEN,CMC, City Clerk Recorder: Michele Neumann April 23,2001 Renton Western DECEIVE® 724South Third See( Inc. Renton,WA 98055 APR 1 9 0 0 0 1 Fax: 425-255-7711 Phone: 425-228-6170 x17 renlorm RENTONCITYCOUNCIL Ewa: 'err' . com April 17, 2001 Neil Watts, Director Development Services Division City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 RE: Metropolitan Place (Sheridan Mixed Use Project), LUA99-141 Alley Usage Dear Mr. Watts: I thank you for your including me in your distribution of your April 9, 2001 letter to Jim Schmidt of Dally Homes. However, I am greatly concerned that the City of Renton is again proceeding with alley agreements without coordinating with all the involved parties. Last year,the parties that utilize the alley entered into a legal agreement(see note 1) granting the City of Renton a temporary easement on their private property. These agreements permitted the City to grant Daily Homes temporary use of several feet of the alley to accomplish excavation and construction of the Metropolitan Place basement and first floor concrete parking structures. The agreements were specific in that the alley disruption would not exceed 39 weeks and were based on the Daily Homes construction schedules (see note 2). Burnett Street was to be used as the staging area and access to the project for the rest of the construction project and the alley was to be restored and reopened at the end of the 39-week period or within 30 days following substantial completion of the parking garage (see note 2). In fact, Daily homes actually completed the parking structure ahead of schedule as the result of the mild and dry winter weather. Renton Western Wear acknowledges that Daily Homes has endeavored to be a good neighbor and everyone has cooperated to make the original agreements regarding the use of the alley work. However, the closure of the adjacent parking lot for Qwest reroofing has significantly affected alley access during the increased Dally usage of the alley to unload upper floor materials that were supposed to be staged and accessed from Burnett Street. The condition of the alley has also significantly deteriorated since the upper floor construction started. Material debris, including sharp objects and nails, are thrown down to the alley floor often coming to rest outside of the Dally fencing. I believe this disregard to proper disposal material handling is the direct cause of three flat tires to Renton Western Wear vehicles. d CITY JF RENTON ea ''',`-., Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator April 9,2001 RECEIVED Jim Schmidt APR 0 9 :4UU1 Daily Homes 3316 Fuhrman Avenue East Seattle,WA 98102 RENTON CITYCOUNCIL Re: Metropolitan Place(Sheridan Mixed Use Project),LUA99-141 Alley Usage Dear Mr. Schmidt: Thank you for your response to my letter sent to Mr.Daily,regarding use of the alley between Burnett Avenue South and Williams Avenue South in Downtown Renton. Following consideration of the points you have made,I have determined that the use of the alley right-of-way may continue by Daily Homes. This decision is based on the following factors: • Construction of the street and sidewalk in Burnett Avenue,on the west side of the Daily project, has just commenced and will continue,precluding the availability of the west side of the project for building construction access. • Puget Sound Energy(PSE)has yet to install a vault and conduits in the alley. • There are safety issues associated with completion of the east side exterior facade of the Daily building that would be reduced if the fence were to remain in place. • Daily proposes to inspect the alley,with representatives from the City, following construction work by PSE. The City of Renton appreciates the effort that Daily Homes has made to keep businesses in the area running smoothly with minimal conflict during the construction of the Metropolitan Place project. We are also concerned,however,that blockage of the alley by both Daily Homes and Qwest will continue to inconveniencg businesses along the alley. In addition,the fencing off of the adjacent parking lot as a staging area for the re-roofmg of the Qwest building has exacerbated the situation. Please be aware that allowing the fence to remain so that the conduit may be placed beneath the pavement of the alley does not mean the fence will be allowed to remain blocking the public right-of-way for an indefinite period of time. If you have any questions, you may contact Elizabeth Higgins,Senior Planner, at 425-430-7382. Sincerely, II DD JJ -- Wl I Neil Watts,Director Development Services Division cc: Planning&Development Committee Members Larry Meckling,Building Official . Susan Carlson,EDNSP Administrator Neil Maune,Building Inspector • Jennifer Henning,Principal Planner Jerry Kavesh,Renton Western Wear Elizabeth Higgins,Senior Planner 1901_2001 1 ncc Cn„th ( rariv Way-Renton_ Washington 98055 c5:%', /1�` Pc-RA' E41.Ke- VA-1 E L q CITY OF RENTON ..la. Planning/Building/Public Works Department 1 Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator March 15, 2001 RECEIVED Mr.Don Daily 5 CU01 Daily Homes 3316 Fuhrman Avenue E RENTQP1C1TYCOJNCIL Seattle,WA 98102 Re: Sheridan Mixed Use Development(Metropolitan Place),LUA-99-141,ECF,SA-A Alley Closure Dear Mr.Daily: As you are aware,the City of Renton negotiated an easement agreement between Daily Homes and owners of property and businesses that abut the alley in downtown Renton adjacent to the Metropolitan Place apartment building. This agreement has allowed Daily Homes to use the public right-of-way during construction of the Metropolitan Place parking garage. In addition, although it was not part of the easement agreement, the parking lot between the Qwest building and the"Cedar River Brewery"has apparently been used,when the alley has been blocked during construction,as an alternative access to the south portion of the alley.' It has recently come to our attention that the property owner of the"Cedar River Brewery" property has fenced their parking lot,thereby,prohibiting its use when the alley is blocked. Apparently,this has increased inconvenience to businesses that use the alley for deliveries. The agreement between the City of Renton,Daily Homes, and the adjoining property owners stated that the easement would expire,"30 days following the substantial completion of the parking garage of the Metropolitan Place Apartments, scheduled for completion 36 weeks after commencement of demolition of the existing buildings on the site." It was the understanding of all parties that"substantial completion"meant pouring the concrete floor of the upper level of parking garage. Therefore,this letter is to notify you that the full right-of-way of the alley,between South 2nd Street and South 3rd Street, and between Burnett Avenue South and Williams Avenue South,will need to be restored for public-use by April 7,2001 (36 weeks from the demolition permit date). If you have any questions,please call the project planner,Elizabeth Higgins, at 425-430-7382. Sincerely, G&T Neil Watts,Director Development Services Division cc: - ' Larry Meckling,Building Official Susan Carlson,EDNSP Administrator Neil Maune,Building Inspector • Jennifer Henning,Principal Planner Jerry Kavesh,Renton Western Wear Elizabeth Higgins,Senior Planner attachment • 1901 -2 Vallr CITY )F RENTON LL <_. Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator Apri19,2001 1 IECEWED Jim Schmidt APR 0 9 all] Daily Homes 3316 Fuhrman Avenue East Seattle,WA 98102 RENTONCITYCOUNCIL Re: Metropolitan Place(Sheridan Mixed Use Project),LUA99-141 Alley Usage Dear Mr. Schmidt: Thank you for your response to my letter sent to Mr.Daily,regarding use of the alley between Burnett Avenue South and Williams Avenue South in Downtown Renton. Following consideration of the points you have made,I have determined that the use of the alley right-of-way may continue by Daily Homes. This decision is based on the following factors: • Construction of the street and sidewalk in Burnett Avenue,on the west side of the Daily project, has just commenced and will continue,precluding the availability of the west side of the project for building construction access. • Puget Sound Energy(PSE)has yet to install a vault and conduits in the alley. • There are safety issues associated with completion of the east side exterior facade of the Daily building that would be reduced if the fence were to remain in place. • Dally proposes to inspect the alley,with representatives from the City,following construction work by PSE. The City of Renton appreciates the effort that Dally Homes has made to keep businesses in the area running smoothly with minimal conflict during the construction of the Metropolitan Place project. We are also concerned,however,that blockage of the alley by both Daily Homes and Qwest will continue to inconvenience businesses along the alley. In addition,the fencing off of the adjacent parking lot as a staging area for the re-roofmg of the Qwest building has exacerbated the situation. Please be aware that allowing the fence to remain so that the conduit may be placed beneath the pavement of the alley does not mean the fence will be allowed to remain blocking the public right-of-way for an indefinite period of time. If you have any questions,you may contact Elizabeth Higgins,Senior Planner,at 425-430-7382. Sincerely, A/4 U f Neil Watts,Director Development Services Division cc: Planning&Development Committee Members Larry Meckling,Building Official Susan Carlson,EDNSP Administrator Neil Maune,Building Inspector Jennifer Henning,Principal Planner Jerry Kavesh,Renton Western Wear Elizabeth Higgins,Senior Planner A,•.V 1901 2001 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, Washington 98055 rr �- � ,v�,l�� K U ►'-�01,1=E - WEB 1, , C(I-I R 9 CIT1 OF RENTON W' • • --� • ,.LL ` Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator March 15, 2001 RECEIVED Mr.Don Daily Irltit{ i 5 1U01 Daily Homes 3316 Fuhrman Avenue E RENTONCRYCO(JN 1L Seattle,WA 98102 Re: Sheridan Mixed Use Development(Metropolitan Place),LUA-99-141,ECF,SA-A Alley Closure Dear Mr.Daily: As you are aware,the City of Renton negotiated an easement agreement between Daily Homes and owners of property and businesses that abut the alley in downtown Renton adjacent to the Metropolitan Place apartment building. This agreement has allowed Daily Homes to use the public right-of-way during construction of the Metropolitan Place parking garage. In addition, although it was not part of the easement agreement,the parking lot between the Qwest building and the"Cedar River Brewery"has apparently been used,when the alley has been blocked during construction,as an alternative access to the south portion of the alley. It has recently come to our attention that the property owner of the"Cedar River Brewery" property has fenced their parking lot,thereby prohibiting its use when the alley is blocked. Apparently,this has increased inconvenience to businesses that use the alley for deliveries. The agreement between the City of Renton,Daily Homes, and the adjoining property owners stated that the easement would expire, "30 days following the substantial completion of the parking garage of the Metropolitan Place Apartments, scheduled for completion 36 weeks after commencement of demolition of the existing buildings on the site." It was the understanding of all parties that"substantial completion"meant pouring the concrete floor of the upper level of parking garage. Therefore,this letter is to notify you that the full right-of-way of the alley,between South 2nd Street and South 3rd Street, and between Burnett Avenue South and Williams Avenue South,will need to be restored for public'use by April 7,2001 (36 weeks from the demolition permit date). If you have any questions,please call the project planner,Elizabeth Higgins, at 425-430-7382. Sincerely, 10a717- Neil Watts,Director Development Services Division cc: Larry Meckling,Building Official Susan Carlson,EDNSP Administrator Neil Maune,Building Inspector Jennifer Henning,Principal Planner Jerry Kavesh,Renton Western Wear Elizabeth Higgins,Senior Planner extuAted attachment 1901:'-2001 1055 South Grady Way Renton,Washington 98055 , '� • APPROVED BY ' • CITY COUNCIL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Date - ," COMMITTEE REPORT June 5,2000 Sheridan Mixed-Use Alley Closure(DaIlyHoines,Metropohtan'PlaceApartments) (Referred January 10,2000) -` - The Planning & Development Committee recommends approval of a temporary closure of the public right-of-way portion of the alley that lies between, and parallel to, Burnett Avenue South and Williams Avenue South, between South Second Street and South Third Street for the construction of the lower level parking garage of the Metropolitan Place Apartments with the following conditions: 1. Access easements must be executed by Ren-Four,Inc.,Renton Western Wear,and US West to benefit American Drapery,Daily Homes,Ren-Four,Inc.,Renton Western Wear, and US West. The City of Renton Attorney will provide easement agreements to all parties for signature. 2. Daily Homes will provide advance notice to all businesses when complete alley closures will occur (closure of both the public right-of-way:and the realigned travel lane). 3. Daily Homes will provide four (4)..comparable.parking spaces for Dobson-Houser-Davidson Attorneys and two(2)parking spaces for Renton Western Wear. 4. Daily will ensure that the travel lane located in the access easement is of sufficient width to allow the passage of vehicles,except when"full alley closure"occurs. 5. If full alley closure coincides.with.Tuesday am pick up of refuse,Daily Homes will be responsible for relocating dumpsters so that they are accessible to Waste Management Inc. If Daily Homes fails to provide such assistance and if``push out''charges are assessed to businesses,they will be paid to WMI by Daily Homes. 6. Daily Homes will provide a forklift truck capable of lifting anticipated deliveries to US West. 7. Daily Homes will restore the alley following construction to comply with City of Renton standards. 8. The reopening of the public right-of-way will follow termination of the access easement agreements thirty(30) days following substantial completion of the parking garage,unless all parties agree to an extension of the agreements. NOTE:The specifics of each condition are Iocated in the attached memo dated June 2,2000. 4-(Al A Kathy olker-Wheeler,Chair Timothy J.Schli r,y e Cha' Dan Clawson, tuber (iC : • • • Return To: City Clerk's Office City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055-3232 TEMPORARY LICENSE AGREEMENT THIS TEMPORARY LICENSE AGREEMENT (this "Agreement") is entered into this day of /42;. , 2000, by U S WEST Communications, Inc., a Colorado corporation ("Owner"), and the City of Renton, a municipal corporation (the "Licensee"). For good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged by Owner, Owner hereby grants to Licensee a temporary license ("License") on, through, over and along a certain portion of Owner's land (the "Property"), which parcel is described in the attached Exhibit A (the "Licensed Premises"), for purposes of public ingress and egress (the "Use") during the construction a parking garage and related facilities (the "Construction") affecting Licensee's property, which is adjacent to the Property. The term of the License granted under this Agreement shall commence as of the date of this Agreement and shall continue until the earlier of the following: (a) 30 days after completion of the Construction; or (b) one year from the date of this Agreement. After such expiration, this Agreement shall be of no further force and effect, except those provisions which specifically survive expiration or other termination, as provided herein. However, if at any time during the term of this License, Licensee fails to fulfill any of its obligations hereunder, and such failure continues for five days after notice of such failure is given to Licensee by Owner, or, if such failure is a type that cannot be cured within five days and Licensee fails to commence to cure such failure within such five-day period and diligently prosecute the same to completion, then Owner may terminate this License with 24-hours' notice to Licensee. Licensee shall ensure the Use of the Licensed Premises is (a) in a safe and orderly manner; (b) in a manner that meets all local, state, and federal laws; (c) in a manner which does not interfere in any way with the use of existing structures, roads, or other improvements of Owner that are necessary to the use of the operational portion of the Property; (d) completely within the Licensed Premises; and (e) at Licensee's sole cost and expense. Owner warrants that no new building, structure, or other above-ground or below-ground obstruction that may interfere with the purpose for which this License is granted will be placed, erected, or installed upon the Licensed Premises during the term of this Agreement. However, Owner does not waive any right to use or enjoy the Licensed Premises, but during the term of this Agreement, Owner shall use the Licensed Premises subject to the rights granted to Licensee pursuant to the License granted herein. TTC/U120-158 U120-158 TEMPORARY LICENSE.DOC • Licensee shall use the Licensed Premises for no purpose other than the Use. Licensee shall be responsible for all injuries and damages to persons or property arising from Licensee's use of the Licensed Premises or any acts or omissions of Licensee, its contractors, agents or employees. Licensee hereby covenants that any and all work performed by Licensee in connection with this Agreement shall be done with care, and any of the surface, curbs, driveways, gutters, and other improvements or landscaping on or abutting the Property or Licensed Premises that are damaged or disturbed during the use of this License shall be promptly restored at Licensee's expense. In effecting any such restoration of the Licensed Premises, including existing improvements and/or landscaping, any restoration of said improvements shall be of the same quality of construction and materials used by Owner for the original construction. Subject to any statutory limits on liability or governmental immunity granted to Licensee, Licensee shall be liable and responsible for any and all claims, actions, causes of action, suits, damages, losses, costs, or expenses, which arise out of or in connection with the License granted herein, except to the extent the same is attributable to the gross negligence or willful misconduct of Owner, its employees, or agents. Except to the extent caused by the gross negligence or willful misconduct of Owner, Licensee releases, waives, and discharges Owner from all liability to Licensee for any and all- loss or damages arising out of or in connection with the License granted herein. Licensee shall maintain comprehensive general liability insurance covering its obligations to Owner under this License with liability limits and coverage satisfactory to Owner. A certificate of insurance evidencing such coverage shall be provided to Owner prior to any entrance by Licensee or its employees, agents or contractors onto the Licensed Premises. Licensee may satisfy such obligations through a program of self-insurance. Licensee hereby waives its right to assess Owner for reimbursement or otherwise of any cost or expense incurred by Licensee to restore or repair the condition of the Property or the Licensed Premises for damage resulting from the Use. Licensee's obligations set forth herein shall survive the expiration or earlier termination of the License granted herein. This instrument contains the entire agreement of the parties concerning the subject hereof. There are no other or different agreements or understandings concerning the subject hereof between Owner and Licensee or their agents. TTC/U120-158 2 U120-158 TEMPORARY LICENSE.DOC Owner and Licensee have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above. OWNER: LICENSEE: U S WEST Communications, Inc., City of Renton, a Colorado corporation a municipal corporation By BY Name DAvc 0 Do r-i/f�_'/i— N Jesse Tanner Title R � r'1,+ a9c #_ e Mayor Approved as to Form By Counsel to Owner: Fish , weetbbm & Levin, P.C. • By �'✓l�° �f 7 4 1 Dae '?,"(� TTC/U120-158 3 U120-158 TEMPORARY LICENSE.DOC On t ' 7 day of , 2000, before mtpersonally appeared /.(/4- --CI W7' Ge/`c_2 td me known to be the /f,' / 4 Leey� of the cor oration that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and a kn>; o edged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and an oath stated that — he w authorized to execute said instrument. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. ,0 a4 .44‘ ° s Printed Name: 72-4/ ,o� V Notary Public in and for the s e of v%\ Washington, residing at , e- cZ 11,,,,,,,,,, My appointment expires: //�..' /C',3 -ea.,PWASr`' On this //.Gt da of , 2000, before me personally appeared _C44a, ` to me known to be the of t WCity of Renton that executed the within and foregoingment, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said city for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and an oath stated that= he w .authorized to execute said instrument. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. ot/ Printed ame:44 ./!J!d J Pc-raced Notary Public in and for th state of Washington, residing at My appointment expires: / f-- D 1/ TTC/U120-158 4 U120-158 TEMPORARY LICENSE.DOC EXHIBIT A Legal Description of the Property The west 10 feet of Lots 14 through 17, all in block 25, Town of Renton, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 1 of Plats, page 135, records of King County, Washington. Situated in Section 18, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. TTC/U120-158 A-1 U120-158 TEMPORARY LICENSE.DOC L.UA- 1 4 1 ) 5H-li,etr / ;y A CIT ''F RENTON IA Office of the City Attorney Jesse Tanner,Mayor Lawrence J.Warren MEMORANDUM To: Elizabeth Higgins From: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date: June 21, 2000 Subject: Construction Covenant—METROPOLITAN PLACE I have reviewed the above-referenced document and the same is approved as to legal form. Lawrence J. LJW:as. cc: Jay Covington A8:174.53. Post Office Box 626 - 100 S. 2nd Street - Renton, Washington 98057 - (425)255-8678 :: This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer June 5, 2000 Renton City Council Minutes Page 198 L) "Department of Transportation officials met with the neighbors in the Shattuck and Talbot Crest residential neighborhoods and offered to stage and conduct its work in a manner that the neighbors found acceptable. The neighborhoods therefore withdrew their opposition to the variance. The Department of Transportation shall supply the City with a summary of the concessions given to the neighbors, such concessions shall be attached to the variance as additional conditions as if fully set forth." MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Noting this is a highly contentious project,Councilman Parker hoped that the State will expedite its completion to the greatest degree possible. ADMINISTRATIVE Chief Administrative Officer Jay Covington reviewed a written administrative REPORT report summarizing the City's recent progress towards goals and work programs adopted as part of its business plan for 2000 and beyond. Items noted included: * Citizens are invited to an open house on potential improvements to the I-405/NE 44th St. Interchange on Tuesday, June 13th, from 4:00 to 8:00 p.m. at the Renton Senior Activity Center. * At a recent meeting of the Employment Service Providers Network, Renton's Community Resource Directory was nominated as one of the best available community resources. * More than 1800 bridge enthusiasts gathered for a four-day competition at the Renton Community Center over Memorial Day weekend. * Jailer Christopher Dement recently graduated number one in Practical Testing in the Corrections Academy Class of the Washington State Criminal Justice Training Commission. AUDIENCE COMMENT Kristen Bamford Wynne, 701 Fifth Ave. Suite 6100, Seattle, 98104, Citizen Comment: Wynne— representing Renton Western Wear,said this business continues to have Sheridan Development& questions and concerns about the language of some of the conditions of Temporary Downtown Alley approval for the temporary closure of the public alley lying between Burnett Closure and Williams Ave. S.,and S. 2nd and 3rd Streets. Ms.Wynne submitted a memo which requested changes or clarification to seven of the eight conditions. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL SUSPEND ITS RULES AND ADVANCE TO THE PLANNING& DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT ON THIS SUBJECT. CARRIED. Planning&Development Planning&Development Committee Chair Keolker-Wheeler presented a report Committee regarding the Sheridan mixed-use development temporary alley closure(Daily Development Services: Homes,Metropolitan Place Apartments). The Committee recommended Sheridan Development& approval of a temporary closure of the public right-of-way portion of the alley Temporary Downtown Alley that lies between,and parallel to,Burnett Ave. S. and Williams Ave. S., Closure between S. 2nd and S. 3rd Streets, for the construction of the lower level [Li I parking garage of the Metropolitan Place Apartments with the following ' t conditions: 1. Access easements must be executed by Ren-Four,Inc.,Renton Western Wear,and US West to benefit American Drapery,Daily Homes,Ren-Four, Inc.,Renton Western Wear,and US West. The City of Renton attorney will provide easement agreements to all parties for signature. 2. Daily Homes will provide advance notice to all businesses when complete June 5,2000 Renton City Council Minutes Page 197 requested noise variance nights to 15 in the vicinity of the Holiday Inn Select, and seven in what is referred to as the freeway section. Since the committee, in considering this variance, is required to consider City Code Section 8-7-8.D concerning availability of practicable alternative methods, the application is deemed amended to reflect this lesser request. The Board of Public Works Findings,Conclusions and Decision should be amended as follows: 1. Finding of Fact#5 should be expanded by adding,prior to the last sentence thereof,the following language: "Substantial daytime closures of traffic lanes along SR-167 and Rainier Ave. S. would prevent business customers from having access to various businesses, including the Holiday Inn Select. As well, the Holiday Inn Select,depending on its location for business,adjacent to I-405 and SR-167, is located in a heavily traveled section of road from which it benefits by visibility and heavy pass-by traffic. Inherent with that benefit comes the detriment that occasional roadway improvements and repairs will be necessary." 2. Finding of Fact#7 should be amended by adding the following language: "The Department of Transportation has voluntarily limited its number of requested variance days to 15 adjacent to the vicinity of the Holiday Inn Select, and seven in the freeway section." 3. The Decision should be modified with the initial sentence reading as follows: "The noise variance,as requested,is granted for 15 days in the vicinity of the Holiday Inn Select, seven days in the freeway section,and 14 days from Grady Way to S. 2nd Street." 4. The Conditions to the Decision should be modified as follows: Condition G)should be modified to read as follows: "After receiving a complaint from a single-family resident, the applicant will be required to take further mitigation measures such as,but not limited to, insulating the windows or providing motel accommodations." Condition H) should be modified to read as follows: "A 24-hour staffed notification phone line shall be posted,and a notice of the phone number hand- delivered to residents in the Talbot Crest and Shattuck residential neighborhoods to call in complaints or voice concerns." Condition I)should be modified to read as follows: "Applicant shall be required to give ten days' prior notification to two individual groups— 1)the Holiday Inn Select,and 2)the Talbot Crest and Shattuck residential neighborhoods. FURTHER,the night work within the area of the Holiday Inn Select should be limited to a maximum of no more than 15 nights; and the portion of the work through the freeway section will be limited to seven nights." The following additional Conditions should be added to read as follows: J) "Work in the vicinity of the Holiday Inn Select,requiring use of the noise variance,should not begin until August 1,2000." K) "Noise-generating activities,including grinding and paving, in the vicinity of the Holiday Inn Select shall commence directly in front of the hotel as early in the evening as possible,and work away from the hotel as the night progresses. Vibratory roller equipment cannot be used directly in front of the hotel." June 5,2000 Renton City Council Minutes Page 199 alley closures will occur(closure of both the public right-of-way and the realigned travel lane). 3. Daily Homes will provide four comparable parking spaces for Dobson- Houser-Davidson Attorneys and two parking spaces for Renton Western Wear. 4. Dally will ensure that the travel lane located in the access easement is of sufficient width to allow the passage of vehicles,except when"full alley closure"occurs. 1 5. If full alley closure coincides with Tuesday a.m.pick-up of refuse,Daily Homes will be responsible for relocating dumpsters so that they are accessible to Waste Management,Inc. If Daily Homes fails to provide such assistance and if"push out"charges are assessed to businesses, they will be paid to WMI by Daily Homes. 6. Daily Homes will provide a forklift truck capable of lifting anticipated j deliveries to US West. 7. Daily Homes will restore the alley following construction to comply with City of Renton standards. 8. The reopening of the public right-of-way will follow termination of the access easement agreements 30(thirty)days following substantial completion ' of the parking garage,unless all parties agree to an extension of the agreements. The specifics of each condition are located in a memorandum dated June 2, 2000, which is incorporated by this reference.* Councilmember Keolker-Wheeler reiterated that,as the Planning& Development Committee report states,the specifics of each condition are spelled out in a memo to the Council from Gregg Zimmerman, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator. She said the only issue raised • by Ms.Wynne which is not addressed in this memo is the potential need for an easement from the property owners of the former Cedar River Brewery. Sue Carlson, Economic Development Administrator, said that access to and from this property is assured since Daily Homes has leased the 4,000 square foot area directly adjacent to the alley. Elliott Kavesh, 724 S. 3rd St.,president of Renton Western Wear, explained that the business would appreciate a distinction between the time when the alley will be partially restored and reopened, and the time when it will be fully restored,as these dates will likely not be the same. *On the advice of the City Attorney,it was MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER,COUNCIL AMEND THE COMMITTEE REPORT TO ADD THE WORDS "which is incorporated by reference"AT THE END OF THE FINAL SENTENCE OF THE REPORT. CARRIED. MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY NELSON,COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT AS AMENDED. CARRIED. Citizen Comment: Anderson— Duane Anderson,PO Box 88745, Seattle,WA, 98138,noted that the SEPA Merlino Annexation&Rezone review for the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment for the Merlino property in the Black River conservation area was completed on March 28th, with the subsequent appeal period expiring on April 14th. Claiming that no SEPA determination and appeal notice was provided to those living within 300 feet of the property, as required,Mr. Anderson asked that this issue be 1 June 5, 2000 Renton City Council Minutes Page 200 reopened and notice provided at this time. Mayor Tanner replied that the City will check its records to ensure that proper public notice was provided in this case. Principal Planner Rebecca Lind clarified that the subject property is already prezoned, and the annexation is exempt from SEPA notification requirements. Citizen Comment: Stone— Don Stone,PO Box 78593, Seattle,WA, 98178,president of the West Hill Merlino Annexation&Rezone Community Council,called the City's attention to a large structure on the Merlino property which appears to be full of crushed concrete. Noting that part of this structure lies a mere 350 feet from a salmon-spawning stream,he was concerned that lime may be leeching into the ground in this area. Adding that King County cannot locate permits for this work,he asked that Renton postpone action on the Merlino annexation until King County investigates this matter. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. Appointment: Board of Ethics Mayor Tanner reappointed Gerry Marsh,437 Williams Ave.N. #107,Renton, 98055,to the Board of Ethics for a four-year term expiring 12/31/2004. Council concur. Community Event: Renton Executive Department requested waiver of permit fees for 2000 Renton River River Days Fee Waivers& Days activities endorsed by the Renton River Days Board of Directors. Staff Banner Installations additionally sought authorization to install River Days banners on City light poles from June 26 through August 15. Council concur. CAG: 00-018,Epoxy Injection City Clerk reported bid opening on 3/07/00 for CAG-00-018,Epoxy Injection for City Hall Post-Tensioned for City Hall Post-Tensioned Slabs; three bids; project estimate$54,000;and Slabs, ECA&Associates submitted staff recommendation to award the contract to the low bidder,ECA &Associates,Inc., in the amount of$44,795. Council concur. Parks: Facilities&Custodial Community Services Department recommended hiring additional personnel to Support for City Hall Fourth provide facilities and custodial support for the tenants leasing the fourth floor Floor Tenants(New of City Hall. Expenditure in the amount of$69,862 for these positions will be Personnel) provided from rental income. Refer to Finance Committee. Plat: Manson, Duvall Ave NE, Development Services Division recommended acceptance of a deed of Deed of Dedication for Road dedication for additional right-of-way for widening Duvall Ave.NE for public Widening(SHP-98-188) road use as part of the Manson Short Plat(SHP-98-188). Council concur. Plat: Buttar Property,NE 4th Hearing Examiner recommended approval,with conditions,of the Buttar St&Niles Ave NE(PP-00- Property Preliminary Plat; 17 single family lots on 4.2 acres located in the 6000 016) block of NE 4th St.and Niles Ave.NE(PP-00-016). Council concur. King County: Trans-Valley Transportation Systems Division recommended approval of an interlocal Study Participation,CAG-00- agreement with King County to participate in the Trans-Valley Study which will study transportation needs in the Renton Valley and surrounding areas. Refer to Transportation Committee. MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE Correspondence was read from Don Custer,Centennial Advisory Committee Citizen Comment: Custer— Chairman,and Sonja Mejlaender, Special Event and Volunteer Coordinator, Downtown Beautification requesting consideration of a hanging flower basket beautification program in Program downtown Renton. MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL REFER THIS MATTER TO THE COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE. CARRIED. HellerEhrni.n ATTORNEYS June 5, 2000 Kristen Bamford Wynne kbwynne@hewm.com (206)389-4280 Main(206)447-0900 C I fY O F R t i JTON Fax(206)447-0849 Randy Corman President 36851-0001 JUN U52J City of Renton City Council L 1055 South Grady Way RECEIVED Renton, WA 98055 CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Re: Temporary Alley Closure for the Metropolitan Place Apartments Dear President Corman and City Council Members: We write to comment on the requested temporary closure of the public alley which lies between Burnett Avenue South and Williams Avenue South and South Second Street and South Third Street and on the conditions of closure proposed in the City of Renton Planning/Building/Public Works Memorandum (the "Planning Memorandum"). We write on behalf of Renton Western Wear("RWW")which is located at 724 South 3rd Street in Renton. This proposal is of significant importance to RWW due to the fact that it receives deliveries of merchandise critical to its business on a daily basis through the public alley. The proposed temporary closure and conditions on the closure set forth in the Planning Memorandum are the result of meetings between the City, Dally Homes, Renton Western Wear and other property owners all working together to find an acceptable solution to the issues created by the proposed closure. While RWW supports the concept embodied by the proposal set forth in the Planning Memorandum, it does continue to have questions and concerns about the language of some of the conditions of approval on the closure. This letter sets out those issues. We respectfully request the City Council's assistance in resolving these few remaining issues. Condition 1. In regard to condition 1, RWW seeks clarification of whether the construction by Dally Homes is likely to foreclose access to the current public right-of-way from South Second Street. If access from Second Street into the current public right-of-way is restricted, RWW believes that an easement may be needed from the property owners of the Old Cedar River Brew Pub. If such an easement is needed, this proposal is not viable without the concurrence of the owners of that property. Condition 2. It is RWW's understanding that Dally Homes has agreed to give written notice (by facsimile) to the businesses at least 5 days in advance of complete alley closure. Heller Ehrman White&McAuliffe LLP 701 Fifth Avenue,Suite 6100 Seattle,WA 98104-7098 www.hewm.com Seattle Portland Anchorage San Francisco SiliconValley Los Angeles San Diego New York Washington D.C. Hong Kong Singapore Affiliated Carnelutti Offices: Milan Rome Paris Padua Naples HellerEhrma Randy Corman A TTOR NEF , June 5,2000 Page 2 This is the agreement which was reached between Daily Homes, the City and the property owners on Thursday, June 1st. In order to reflect that agreement, we would appreciate a revision to the condition which requires written notification (by facsimile) at least 5 days in advance of any such closure. Condition 3. It is RWW's understanding that two parking spaces will be provided to it free of charge at the Renaissance Building. This was agreed to by Daily Homes. We would appreciate a revision to this condition to reflect this agreement. Condition 4. The vehicles of concern in this condition include 18 wheel trucks. It is RWW's understanding that this condition is intended to ensure that the access easement is of a sufficient width and design to enable the safe transit both forward and in reverse by the 18 wheel trucks which make deliveries to the business operating on that alley. Condition 5. This condition as currently drafted is limited to "Tuesday am" waste pickup. RWW believes the condition should apply to the "regular garbage pick-up by Waste Management, Inc." in the event that the date or time for such pick-up is changed by Waste Management, Inc. for any reason. Condition 6. RWW has no questions or comments regarding this condition. Condition 7. It is RWW's understanding that the public alley will be restored upon completion of construction of the parking garage lid rather than completion of the entire project. The language of this condition is unclear in this regard. Assuming a 30-day time frame to complete the restoration is reasonable, RWW requests that this condition be revised to read as follows: "7. Daily Homes will restore the alley within 30 days following substantial completion of construction of the parking garage lid and such restoration shall comply with City of Renton standards." Condition 8. RWW is concerned that the language of this condition is unclear. RWW believes that the easements must remain in place until the public alley is reopened and that the easements should terminate only after that has occurred. Consequently, we believe the condition should be revised as follows: "8. The public alley will reopen following substantial completion of the parking garage lid and restoration of the public alley. The restoration shall be completed and the alley reopened within 30 days of substantial completion of the parking garage lid. The easements shall terminate when the alley is reopened, unless all parties agree to an extension of the easement agreements." HellerEhrmar Randy Corman A T T OR NE V , June 5,2000 Page 3 RWW has one concern not addressed in the Planning Memorandum. That concern relates to any damage which may occur to the easement property as a result of the increased traffic on that property arising out of this temporary alley closure. To the extent that any damage does occur which impedes traffic through the easements, RWW believes that the City or Daily should take steps within a reasonable timeframe to repair that damage so as to enable the continued free flow of delivery trucks through the alley. RWW believes that such work should take place within 2 days of any such damage. An issue discussed at the meeting on June 1st was the cooperation required by all parties in order to enable continued delivery of products and services during the construction of the Daily Homes project. Daily and the other property owners agreed to work together to temporarily move trucks and construction equipment to permit other alley passage and generally continue the "good neighbor" cooperation that currently exists for the mutual benefit of all users. The City staff discussed designating an"ombudsmen" at the City to whom the parties could turn in the event that the cooperation breaks down for any reason. RWW continues to believe that all parties would be benefited by the designation of such an individual at the City. Finally, in regard to schedule, it is RWW's understanding based on the meeting with Dally Homes and the City that the alley will only be fully closed (public alley and realigned travel lane) on days when concrete is being poured. Dally estimated that this would take place on approximately 14 days within the 34 week construction schedule. Also, RWW understands that the total closure is not likely to exceed 5 hours on any given day. In light of the 34 weeks projected by Daily for the construction and the additional 4 weeks possibly needed to restore the alley, it is RWW's understanding that the alley should be reopened by March 15, 2001. This schedule, as set forth by Daily, is a schedule with which RWW can live so long as the conditions on the alley closure as discussed above are met. We greatly appreciate this opportunity to comment on the proposed temporary alley closure. We also wish to thank Elizabeth Higgins and other City of Renton staff members who have worked with us to find an acceptable solution to the alley closure issues. Very truly yours, Kristen Bamford Wynne 139734 vO1.SE(2ZT$01!.DOC) 6/5/00 6:52 PM(36851.0001) • APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Date G - o� COMMITTEE REPORT June 5,2000 Sheridan Mixed-Use Alley Closure(Dally Homes,Metropolitan Place Apartments) (Referred January 10, 2000) The Planning & Development Committee recommends approval of a temporary closure of the public right-of-way portion of the alley that lies between, and parallel to, Burnett Avenue South and Williams Avenue South, between South Second Street and South Third Street for the construction of the lower level parking garage of the Metropolitan Place Apartments with the following conditions: 1. Access easements must be executed by Ren-Four,Inc.,Renton Western Wear,and US West to benefit American Drapery, Dally Homes, Ren-Four, Inc., Renton Western Wear, and US West. The City of Renton Attorney will provide easement agreements to all parties for signature. 2. Dally Homes will provide advance notice to all businesses when complete alley closures will occur (closure of both the public right-of-way and the realigned travel lane). 3. Dally Homes will provide four (4) comparable parking spaces for Dobson-Houser-Davidson Attorneys and two(2)parking spaces for Renton Western Wear. 4. Dally will ensure that the travel lane located in the access easement is of sufficient width to allow the passage of vehicles,except when"full alley closure"occurs. 5. If full alley closure coincides with Tuesday am pick up of refuse,Dally Homes will be responsible for relocating dumpsters so that they are accessible to Waste Management Inc. If Dally Homes fails to provide such assistance and if"push out"charges are assessed to businesses,they will be paid to WMI by Dally Homes. 6. Dally Homes will provide a forklift truck capable of lifting anticipated deliveries to US West. 7. Dally Homes will restore the alley following construction to comply with City of Renton standards. 8. The reopening of the public right-of-way will follow termination of the access easement agreements thirty(30) days following substantial completion of the parking garage, unless all parties agree to an extension of the agreements. NOTE:The specifics of each condition are located in the attached memo dated June 2,2000. e r _ Kathy olker-Wheeler, Chair Timothy J. Schli r, V e Cha. Dan Clawson, tuber CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works MEMORANDUM DATE: June 2,2000 TO: Randy Corman,President City Council Members FROM: Gregg Zimmerman,Administrator STAFF CONTACT: Elizabeth Higgins,X7382 SUBJECT: Request for Temporary Alley Closure During Construction ISSUE: To temporarily close the City's portion of the alley for the construction of the lower level parking garage for the Metropolitan Place Apartments. This alley lies between, and parallel to, Burnett Avenue South and Williams Avenue South, between S. Second Street and South Third Street. Requests to close portions of public streets and other rights-of-way for various periods of time require approval by the Renton City Council (RMC 9-9-3). NOTE: For the purposes of this report, "alley closure" refers to the closing of the existing public right-of-way necessitating use, by access easement agreement, of private property as a realigned travel lane. The term "complete alley closure" refers to the temporary (estimated duration up to 5 hours) closure of both the public right-of-way and the realigned travel lane. BACKGROUND: The Metropolitan Place Apartments is the third project constructed by Daily Homes and furthers the City's effort to revitalize downtown Renton. The project will have 90 apartments on top of a garage with 150 Park `n Ride stalls and 90 resident parking stalls. The residential portion will be in two buildings of three stories each over the garage and be surrounded by landscaped courtyards. There will be approximately 3,500 square feet of street-level commercial/retail space. The site plan for the project was approved December 16, 1999,and a condition of the approval requires Council approval of the temporary alley closure. Negotiations are in progress with King County regarding the 150 Park `n Ride stalls associated with this project. This contract with King County is necessary for the project to proceed. As with any redevelopment, there are anticipated to be temporary inconveniences to the surrounding neighbors at various times during project construction. The challenge is providing a quality project, within time and budget, which also has the least amount of negative impacts to the surrounding neighbors and other construction projects planned in the area. The timing of this project is critical and work must begin by June 15, in order to avoid delay of the Metro transit center construction (Burnett side). It is anticipated that the lower level parking garage will require approximately 34 to 36 weeks for construction. The original site plan included full alley closure for the duration of the construction of the project. Upon researching alley use of existing well-established businesses, it was determined that the alley is unique in that it has a high volume of activity associated with the businesses located in this area. With the assistance of the businesses that use the alley, Daily Homes and the City have explored a number of options to minimize the impacts of this project on the neighbors. These options included different construction methods, temporary delivery locations, as well as a temporary realignment of the alley. In addition, this project encountered another unique obstacle, a fiber optic cable system that is located in the public right-of-way in the alley. This fiber optic cable is CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works MEMORANDUM June 2,2000 Page 2 the central switching for Renton, dial tone, long distance and data service lines. The location of the fiber optic cable system, necessitates cautionary measures in order to protect them during the construction. The lease with King County requires 150 parking stalls with specific dimensions and lanes with specific turning radii. In order for the project to achieve these requirements, and also work with the depth of City lots in this portion of town, it became necessary to construct lot line to lot line. This provides the required number of stalls, the turning radii required, and space needed for the ramp between parking levels. The original construction plan requiring complete alley closure in order to "open cut" at a one-to-one (1:1) slope for the underground garage foundations, has been revised due to the presence of the fiber optic cable system that lies on the west side of the alley within a few feet of the Metropolitan Place property line. The construction plan has been changed to a combination of shoring and open cut methods. For this reason, the alley will only be closed intermittently, rather than completely, for the period of time required to demolish the existing building and build the underground portion of the garage. For this portion of the project, the travel lane of the public right-of-way is needed. Alternatively, the construction method of full shoring also reduces the feasibility of the project, due to higher construction costs. NEIGHBORING BUSINESSES' ISSUES: Businesses that use the alley include American Drapery; Dobson-Houser-Davidson Attorneys, and other businesses in the same building, which is owned by Ren-Four, Inc.; Renton Western Wear; and US West. Issues raised by these businesses include the relocation of alley parking spaces, the use of alley for pick up and deliveries and other services (mobile paper shredding, etc.), the ability for garbage dumpsters to be relocated or otherwise made accessible for Waste Management, Inc.,and advance notice of temporary full-alley closures. These issues have been addressed in the following manner: Relocation of Alley Parking Spaces: Daily Homes will provide alternate parking spaces in the following manner: a. Four (4) spaces will be provided for Dobson-Houser-Davidson Attorneys in the 222 Building, located at 222 Williams Avenue South. A verbal agreement with the owner of the 222 Building has been reached for the lease of these spaces. If these are not ultimately available, spaces considered comparable by Dobson-Houser-Davidson Attorneys will be provided. b. The City of Renton will sign one parking space on the west side of Williams Avenue South, adjacent to the Ren-Four Building at 229 Williams Avenue South (location of Dobson-Houser-Davidson Attorneys)for"disabled parking only." c. One parallel parking space will be retained in the alley, behind the Ren-Four Building at 229 Williams Avenue South, for disabled driver parking. d. Daily Homes will provide two (2) parking spaces at the Renton Renaissance Building for use by Renton Western Wear. Issue paper(rev).rtfl CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works MEMORANDUM June 2,2000 Page 3 Use of Alley for Pick Up and Delivery and Other Services: Daily will ensure that the travel lane located in the access easement is of sufficient width to allow the passage of vehicles, except when "full alley closure"occurs. Access to dumpsters by Waste Management Inc. WMI): It is anticipated that WMI will be able to access dumpsters in a normal manner, unless full alley closure coincides with Tuesday am pick up of refuse. In event the latter occurs, Daily Homes will be responsible for relocating dumpsters so that they are accessible to WMI. If Daily Homes fails to provide such assistance and if"push out"charges are assessed to businesses,they will be paid to WMI by Daily Homes. Full Alley Closure: Daily Homes will provide advance notice to all businesses when complete alley closures will occur(closure of both the public right-of-way and the realigned travel lane). Notification will take place in the following manner: a. Notification will be made by facsimile sent by Daily Homes to the designated contact person for each business. b. Notification will be five days in advance of closure, unless weather-related delays necessitate rescheduling closure. c. Businesses will have the responsibility of forwarding the message to the secondary contact in the firm if the primary contact is unavailable. The heaviest delivery of goods (up to or exceeding 3,000 Ibs) is to the US West building. Due to the nature of the items, the method of delivery (by truck-mounted crane), and location of receiving area (through doors opening directly to the outside of the building from the second and third floors) the deliveries must continue to occur at the same location in the alley. By moving the travel lane of the alley, the stabilizing legs of the crane may not be able to function due to the reduced width of the alley. For this reason,the following plan has been proposed: Assistance with US West Deliveries: Dally Homes will provide a forklift truck capable of lifting anticipated deliveries to US West. This assistance will be provided in the following manner: a. The forklift will be located at the Burnett Station project site (S. 4th Street and Burnett Avenue South) until the demolition and excavation of the building at the Metropolitan Place construction site is complete. Upon start of foundation work, the forklift will be relocated to the Metropolitan Place construction site. b. While the forklift is at the Burnett Station, if prior notification of delivery is received by Daily Homes, the equipment can be moved to the alley and be in place at the time of the delivery. c. If prior notification is not received, the on-site project manager at the Burnett Station site can be notified that the forklift needs to be relocated to the Metropolitan Place site. d. If the delivery truck cannot wait the short period of time it will take to move the forklift, the delivery can be made adjacent to the alley and a worker from Daily Homes posted to watch the delivered items until the forklift arrives to move the items into the building. Issue paper(rev).rtI\ CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works MEMORANDUM June 2,2000 Page 4 In addition to the above, a key issue is the granting of access easements by Ren-Four, Inc., Renton Western Wear, and US West to benefit all parties. These easements would allow temporary realignment of the travel lane onto the private property of Ren-Four, Inc, Renton Western Wear, and US West and allow continued use during alley closure. Unless a negotiated extension is put in place, the access easement agreement will expire thirty (30) days following substantial completion of the parking garage. These issues have all been addressed and suggestions made by both the businesses and Dally Homes on how they can be resolved. All parties have expressed the desire to cooperate and the conditions attached to the recommended approval (see below)have been reviewed by the parties involved. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning & Development Committee recommends that the Council approve that the public right-of-way portion of the alley that lies between, and parallel to, Burnett Avenue South and Williams Avenue South, between South Second Street and South Third Street be closed temporarily for the construction of the lower level parking garage of the Metropolitan Place Apartments with the following conditions: CONDITIONS: 1. Access easements must be executed by Ren-Four, Inc., Renton Western Wear, and US West to benefit American Drapery, Dally Homes, Ren-Four, Inc., Renton Western Wear, and US West. The City of Renton Attorney will provide easement agreements to all parties for signature. 2. Dally Homes will provide advance notice to all businesses when complete alley closures will occur(closure of both the public right-of-way and the realigned travel lane). 3. Dally Homes will provide four (4) comparable parking spaces for Dobson-Houser- Davidson Attorneys and two(2)parking spaces for Renton Western Wear. 4. Dally will ensure that the travel lane located in the access easement is of sufficient width to allow the passage of vehicles,except when"full alley closure"occurs. 5. If full alley closure coincides with Tuesday am pick up of refuse, Dally Homes will be responsible for relocating dumpsters so that they are accessible to Waste Management Inc. If Dally Homes fails to provide such assistance and if"push out" charges are assessed to businesses,they will be paid to WMI by Dally Homes. 6. Dally Homes will provide a forklift truck capable of lifting anticipated deliveries to US West. 7. Dally Homes will restore the alley following construction to comply with City of Renton standards. 8. The reopening of the public right-of-way will follow termination of the access easement agreements thirty(30) days following substantial completion of the parking garage,unless all parties agree to an extension of the agreements. Issue paper(rev).rtf\ t.‘,.. ". i.,. i4‘.11::' 21 I Al : ;"° ' .:.... *t' .S2"'I;...')....*LT". . i7.4 i,t. m..=.1110 I .0.essrma •N'ts.. ..4 •'•-I''... . „, ., _ t . • -, 'iptle„-A------- •..„4 . ,,.,.. 1112M,M1111111111 I liddillhilli ja :O. 6I .-R.O.-..1.',14•\1;114-1, ' • ....‘i. '''.. • V WHITWORTH AVE. :• V V -----, ,St 'Z' `''':'r-t- •IIIIINSIMIgt, iimiill" ..LI.,,,Tiroah .., ::........- 1 0> NIINIM k 0 EEME k---t•-. . ...kid.M\ W 1 ,„...=.:.P.M. L111.01= ' -`?::-- ,....= R k.-7_ t, t :. 0 . -,1 les . OM NRIS ATE S. \. .., ....Ili -"-• - , ••........., . 111111111F-riali-tra „-.. ...„... , , .....--,. ' ',' '' •\WPM= M EZNE a. ; CI, 3 ,\11' . 41...'r"."' -ma .... .CI '. ;.....r.:. ........ ...1.".X1d,. %,.. .1%R s: 11 III aim 1 _ ,,f..k. a iltr:,,,A, r•-..•-f.a. ,, -1 (i‘ 2414'1 "«i -'•-• • ."'t To SW h9, .....7- - . ;:: . . .,...:., ,-,,,," . . .. ...... 1 .,, 1 ....-il 4--vt., ---NIPIC-•-. >. , -.,. . =• . I libitum: , .„ .,,,, 8 0 .„N.‘i 41.:1. IV: ast: M,134. 0..• SIMMERS OF VS. •4,./ S i ISIS 1 ,0-. 1. . •,.. ..•• ,• • • z r 1 t • , ..'....,.-9 •.. ,, __1.• IL '7,---• . •" .w.! : MK ' ' •••-r•Jr.V V,:W.I r i- . '-',..--v,-• 56 96C0 -•A. ; i 1;• ‘i ' .: rpiL\_, ' , ilmori . ,, ...?:,4,-,,,.!77,4.A-,..-5 ,, T . - ' li"p-7..c 1.1.'..'''.2 •I-,4te\ r • t i '., veti)04 r•.: P•t47- ..:.. RVOT VI, ... e..,!i••_•......1 .AWIMAillOwIL, •',.783930 .... i ,_.. 4 •eq.,. , RS' ' %.• '\ -1.1:"..4 41.4781114 tt I me •1::' WM.,: ol'Irrk, Z.44 Fin '"MIIINEhr. ,IP ‘7:4.:,...T.i...; ,. IR?: Irl r......._:' .. 5 .:.4.41 ''' • %,%. .1.-• •la , __..------ %"'•• ... -.4 'A I Bt. T. „.„. , . 9u PIZ/7 _ .; /r -- "Altramal I--71-- a....---4 I' ' .- ..':::."../.----:-L-•-•--•--A"'"--"'' • • BURNETT AN,E.....,...; VIZ 723150 , , . •• .. /,' .,„ . ,,,. T r,-'1'A- 1 •••• •,, ''••• - • - I 02 N., ...." . *7.)19:A/ ;:' 4• A :. •1‘,/, • I • • „, , . el eillEllin mullsrall 11.1 ;1 --...-. JA"'tyit , ''Iti(t,;•%. '`4.‘ 1::!617 VA lirkalli: 1 IINIUME1441M.._.,s-•&____. ,-„ ,,. _ _ ----,-4\•-----------...... , . ,, - -r ' • . •: , . \ . , ilt 7 ) ,.,-•:.,.. cd .1 2, a V* 2..:... ..;.-i.2'2.c .' . 1"%.2 4.N. V/ - 1••r Zji; t z.f ij a' .z., : "4.: . ',QT..1';..1•0.:--\*.T. 4tt.'...lzy.t •t TI:1•• • lama=,t ...-.,. , , „,.6„ i „ ,. .. . . ... ,......... . ,/E. , . 1.. ,„... : „,,L,A.,..,,,.., „..„. . ..1 ‘ . wAns A ,...,,,,s ATE ,S‘,.. .r 74 :::biliglik" '..111'3' T.:. El t : ....,,,,.. ... . ,. ... 4 .,:',. i .._:: _• * ,i,, -...itoi I". ,z.. v,,,. ,i.,,,,, •rk.„,....:.,g......,-- P:i Itc It'i..c3r ,A4t, 11::.,.,. _111111 !ilk- ..112_,Rippli .N -.1 i '`..111191111 - 10' '''•i -A---4---,_i Ifi•.1,J. 4' f•A V . 2 . ,,,_ .. '' A-magemormososam, ' / 1,4••••- 1 1 :' ' .4 •, ;re. .1./.? • g:11, gri it.. . . • - N, - - - .-, %. 4t 4 1 4 '..t a .-i, .1 :-.. A-1 I '•°'... 1111' i TS.‘I:,• 16..%. •Qc.. .-• .4, e .. , r ! -7, .,. 'f '2 1 • 'Yr"), 1 Nii WELLS AVE. AVE. ‘A.S.0.A -4.•••Ot tA• RENTON . • , 4.3150 Ilawc AVE S$ • • , % t • • • 07 . . 0 • gm ....' . 7 - , ./3 tt: ' " - ' ' - ' ' , . :j•.ri , , , , , NEI \,,ack ,, - 1----. - "N,-'''t-- A'A •A ‘4‘:.; 1 •F:: \itelle4O1 :t ...1 1111111 Illolik --- •. - N-A____ :._---- -- .,: ...,,,-, -:...-,ic)-1, e ri ...-.1 . i• , . ... - .. ...-rt•,,.., \ • •,,,,, •.i7, ... 11111111-1.g--14 111, iv::::-;:341111 r,..\,, I.. li iiV A I Ni ^:'''''••• '‘.cIN7-4,,, sr 4' 4,,,.,/,','r'0,t:,'`i. .'' . ,,..-u- .2 § ,,,,„,:a._ ;z IIIEW:,rfli4 . V t en .1...!!;.- 3. . °.. . •,...,..... / ••..' -%\\.71 • • ? _ It SNIIIIIMME-6 1111 _ gy . ...:s.40.,gisite,;,."- • -• . - !• :' ,. -. ,\ ,t, 111110 1: rISI,N "li..11 'cl'• Y. ,,..:0: ,,i ')..1:.k.'''./":1; ---;.-'''.,:1- : -•-'" I 1.:: 1.741,11419.11111:11711314"..... O... lativedx;. , ,....e. /.....1„... /:..,./,/,,...... x.t. ....,, E:L:. • 1:7 . • :-`---5 : -, ; : '•"•••>-:. -4, ...i. . ... .... . . ,f•.": 1-: k..`',,"`... .,-;!. ,,,\ t " i :. : : z • .- . ant ..... alinutionn I & ' .,g Az...- , ] . • i • ,.....„. ... "...........A.-.. k•• ''''.•••:".••••,„ ,,,,.. ,E• i i Is/ ,..7;" t .mo. Wt. 9. ... ••:::••• A l• / ,,,,„,1- .. li;;;;;:::,• ' / ././AS/4. . •AS:•‘":‘,';‘/....17 -, .......••,..V. III 111,13.'1 ' .. . .., ' '• i.p. :t• 111111.1*iil k''-. .sl :'.•la: /...1'.//1 ••:/ 1:7‘ . ‘i't 1." ..... 1 ii AM ' -..... -,N.;"V / \e •. „AiIMIL, - : ,...• :... . ., .. .....„: : .: ., . .. ,.... .. .., .....ighirimi:--7.- • .11, st, -'.:i . 75---.‹,e i ,. v ,z,.. . .. 1 sr :vv.,. ..,• „„,,,/ ... ,,, .,,. PARK llemilAnzu, .•t't1' • hat/. ,,: ': .--);,,,.,.../ • ',....,\ „„, . -.. i•,,, c'ts . : ...,........... ,.. Lt., .-... . A e,,,,At , „. .L" . ,,,,..j.„.•: ..; 4, 40_ ..,• . .:, . . . a r..1 ••. .„.• ,,./e / ....\. 4.0 ••• I..'I • I I . 1 • t • '. 1 - - - 4. .S.,. :A..7... T.11 /1 :AS..A 'Zi - 0 ' 0• •.: -N %. ': : •• • - • A' • A • AA % 1!:\..A A.-1..r.1• 1 • 1 • 1 -r--4 t S 1 It UTILITIES NOTE: 1. ALL PROPOSED STORM WATER AND 1.1 SANITARY SEWER DRAINLINES, WATER SERVICES, AND FIRE PROTECTION LINES SHALL BE CONNECTED TO EXISTING UTILITIES WITHIN THE CITY R/W. LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE FURNISHED BY THE OWNER. f-- . ii t , , ,,y) N 0130.48"E 560.05. (560.09 CITY OF RENT0_141. 1,4,4 n. -LIMITS OF /p. I 1...., S. 13(1101r1"I' ST / WORK ,., <-. - o 44, N 1 41144. ,.: V. ' giii 1 , 12g5t' 1 6 0 0 C4‘ • • 1 C.; ,,..: t• TO re Glittitt•ED ...., \ I N. 1 r RtNi:g0' V : • ,.,."...,,,,. '' :I PROPOSED BUIL3IN6 \ A;,:,,".i :00= (H '-i':„>c,i:"....,,I.„},,,,,-„i,..,' f, l, ,it, ', t, ,,... .1-._.........."•.•/..•"•/w/• ,J..,0'.1 ir1. 1 I1 I.«..0.1-,; "-II.4 •J0`J.t,...rI0.t,-."I.--,-,I)I.' III. Z !i1 g!it20E..F- .1 flc 0 ig — -:- _--0? __.- E-•I ALLEY :„.. ,..., :13.,.0 • LA. Z I . 0.C.) §..--.-c - ,, • m ›. 4= 2 9.4 7.4 = 9 d al cr) :a z SITE PLANS PLANA), z a a ... OUT Cl JOB NO:99-4519 1 EE � 1 �'� �% `, CIT' OF RENTON ' Hearing Examiner Jesse Tanner,Mayor Fred J.Kaufman February 29, 2000 CITY OF RENTON F E B 2 9 2000 RECEIVED CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Mr. Jerry Kavesh Renton Western Wear, Inc. 724 S Third Street Renton, WA 98055 Re: Sheridan Mixed Use Development No. LUA-99-141, SA-A Dear Mr. Kavesh: This office has reviewed your letter of February 26, 2000. This office has no authority to reopen or extend appeal periods for Administrative Determinations, nor any inherent power to investigate whether or not the legal requirements regarding notice were followed. As a side note, any alley vacation is a matter that will be decided by the City Council after a public hearing. If this office can be of further assistance,please feel free to write. Sincerely, \CfiLLA_ k_ce_r.„„ Fred J. Kaufman Hearing Examiner cc: Mayor Tanner Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer Larry Warren, City Attorney Marilyn Petersen, City Clerk Peter Rosen, Development Services 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 - (425)430-6515 M E O U [ I • Renton Western Wear,Inc. ric O724 South Third Street ill FEB 1 Renton,WA 98055 2 9 j�!'_;'f Fax: 425-255-7711 Phone: 425-228-6170 x17 CM'OF RENTON E-Mail: IeRY@rentonww.com HEARING EXAMINER February 26, 2000 Hearing Examiner City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 RE: Sheridan Mixed Used Development#LUA-099-141, SA-A, ECF Dear Hearing Examiner: We have been advised to appeal the approval of the Land Use Report of December 14, 1999 regarding the Sheridan Mixed Used Development#LUA-099-141, SA-A, ECF. We request that the appeal process be reopened based upon lack of timely and proper notification of the Land Use Report by the City of Renton. We further request that all affected businesses and property owners be provide timely notification of the land use report and the formal appeal process. The particular issue we are disputing is the staff recommendation to close the alley between Burnett and Williams. As detailed in our January 4, 2000 letter to the Renton City Council, this alley is critical to the operation of our business and alley closure would place an undue burden upon Renton Western Wear. Sincerely, J Kavesh Renton Western Wear, Inc. VP/General Manager Cc: Wyman K. Dobson, Ren-Four& Dobson, Houser& Davidson Dick Wilson, American Drapery George Chappel, US West C:UK Documents\RentonAlley\021100Hearing Examiner.doc LAW OFFICPS b BSON, HOUSER & DAVIDSON f v WYMAN K.DOBSON,P.S. 229 WILLIAMS AVE. SO. DAVID C.DOBSON PAUL W.(BUD)HOUSER,Jr. . P.O. BOX 59 (1918-1995) FRANK V.DAVIDSON RENTON, WASHINGTON 98057-0059 JOHN W.DOBSON OF COUNSEL: (425) 255-8641 (1907-1999) PAUL W.HOUSER,Sr. FAX (425) 228-0288 OidtLOF;,�E NT Clry OF ON vi REN February 2, 2000 F'7 0 2000 RECEIVED Mr. Peter Rosen, Project Manager Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton WA 98055 Re: Land Use #LUA-99-141, SA-A, ECF Application names - Sheridan Mixed Use Development • Gentlemen I write this letter on behalf of Ren-Four, Inc., who is the owner of the building located at 229-231 Williams Avenue South. The rear of our property which contains several parking spots for our tenants abuts the alley which is to the east of the applicants proposed development. Late last year, we became aware of the above application and proposed determination of non significant use. We were advised of the matter by an adjoining property owner. We looked for the posting of Notice of the Application on Williams Street and found none. There was no posting observed in the alley. If the city code does not require notice mailed and/or served on adjacent property owners on a project of this sort, it is our belief that the city ordinance should be changed to require such notice. We understand that there was a notice posted on Second Avenue and Burnett Avenue. Our property, fronting on Williams, did not provide us reasonable, nor adequate notice, by the postings on Second Avenue and Burnett Avenue. We find it difficult to believe that we as an adjoining property owner did not receive direct notice of the application at the time the same was submitted to the city. We have examined the application and it is our opinion that because of the size of the project, the amount of projected tenants and the ingress and egress of the number of cars that are contemplated via Second Avenue will have a significant impact on the adjoining property and on the traffic on Second Avenue. We are also concerned about the alley access from the project be restricted so that the ingress and egress traffic to the current users of the alley not be increased. We understand that there were some negotiations between the city and a couple of the other adjacent property owners and there was a suggested temporary expansion of the alley-way for delivery service to those two businesses which would eliminate the parking behind our building. We are willing to cooperate with all of the adjoining property owners with respect to this issue providing that equivalent substitute parking is provided for our tenants/employees i.e. in the old Cedar River Brewery parking lot or the old Peoples Bank parking lot. We would expect equivalent parking to be provided to us, no further from the office than these two referenced lots. We close after dark and must furnish to our tenants safe parking. Our other concerns include that of the duration of time needed to complete the project. We would expect that there be a definite deadline date with surety bonds posted to guarantee the same. We are also concerned about our garbage pick up and any added costs associated therewith be paid with appropriate security for the payment of the same. We would request that notice of all proceedings of this matter be sent to us at the following address: Ren-Four PO Box 59 Renton WA 98057-0059 (425) 255-8641 (425) 228-0288 facsimilie. Sincerely W Dobson P.S. At a counsel meeting late in December, Kathy Koelker-Wheeler suggested that a notice of the application be sent to all of the adjacent property owners/tenants. To date, we have received no such notice. January 10,2000 Renton City Council Minutes Page 7 ADMINISTRATIVE Chief Administrative Officer Jay Covington reviewed a written administrative REPORT report summarizing the City's recent progress towards goals and work programs adopted as part of its business plan for 2000 and beyond. Items noted included: * The State Department of Health has approved Renton's Wellhead Protection Plan for its water supply through April 30,2005. * The City of Renton's community services scholarship program, administered by Human Services and the Parks Department,awarded 82 scholarships made possible by donations from many community organizations. * The New Year Winter Fitness Extravaganza,held Jan. 5th,provided demonstrations in yoga, aerobics, and kick-boxing along with other wellness and exercise information. AUDIENCE COMMENT Jerry Kavesh,owner of Renton Western Wear, 724 S.Third St.,Renton,98055, Citizen Comment: Kavesh— said although downtown business owners look forward to the Sheridan mixed- Sheridan Mixed-Use use development project,those who use the alley between Second and Third Development in the from Burnett to Williams don't want this access closed. Mr.Kavesh explained Downtown&Alley Closure that his business frequently uses the alley for deliveries and other purposes. He asked that his comments be considered along with his belief that if the alley is closed,Dally Homes should be required to provide monetary mitigation to Renton Western Wear for business disruption and increased operating costs resulting from the closure. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. Appointment: Municipal Arts Mayor Tanner appointed Renne Saling, 17560 SE 136th St.,Renton, 98059,to Commission the Municipal Arts Commission to fill a vacancy for a three-year term which expires on 12/31/2001; and appointed Marie Brown, 2000 Benson Rd.#115- 350,Renton, 98055,also to the Municipal Arts Commission to fill a vacancy for a three-year term which expires on 12/31/2002. Refer to Community Services Committee. CAG: 99-160, 1999 Sewer Lift City Clerk reported bid opening on 12/07/99 for CAG-99-160, 1999 Sewer Lift Station(Talbot Crest) Station Replacement project; 13 bids; engineer's estimate$298,925.00; and Replacement,Hisey Const submitted staff recommendation to award the contract to the low bidder,Hisey Construction,Inc., in the amount of$236,965.20. Council concur. Parks: Former City Hall Community Services Department requested authorization to demolish the jail Building Jail and Basement and police portions of the ground floor of the former city hall building at 200 Demolition Mill Ave. S.to complete conversion of the building for high-tech office space. Refer to Community Services Committee. Parks: King County Funding Community Services Department recommended approval of an amendment to to Purchase May Creek Open an interlocal agreement with King County for open space funding to accept up Space to$200,000 in matching funds which Renton will use to acquire open space property along May Creek near I-405. Council concur. (See page 9 for resolution.) Parks: Glenn Property Community Services Department recommended approval of a purchase and Acquisition(May Creek) sale agreement with John W.Glenn Jr. and Ellen L. Glenn for approximately 1/2 acre of land along May Creek between I-405 and Jones Ave.NE at the negotiated price of$140,000. Council concur. January 10, 2000 Renton City Council Minutes Page 8 CRT: 99-011, Holmes v Court Case filed on 12/23/99 in King County Superior Court on behalf of Inez Renton Holmes,a resident of King County,alleging personal injuries and unreasonable search and seizure after being stopped by Renton police officers on 12/25/96 while driving her car,which was incorrectly listed as stolen. Refer to City Attorney and Insurance Services. Development Services: Development Services Division recommended approval of the request from Request for Release of Chuck Kim,president of Q-1 Corporation, 1160 Industry Dr., Seattle,98188,to Restrictive Covenant(Q-1 remove a restrictive covenant on property located on the south side of Grady Corp,Grady Way& Way,250 feet west of Oakesdale Ave. SW,as the property has been rezoned Oakesdale) and the covenant is inconsistent with development standards in the new zone. Refer to Planning&Development Committee. Annexation: Morrison, SE Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department 128th St requested a public hearing be set on January 24,2000 on zoning for the Morrison Annexation(40.56 acres located north of SE 128th St.). Council concur. Streets:N 8th&Houser,Deed Property Services Division recommended accepting a Deed of Dedication from of Dedication from Boeing The Boeing Company for the corner rounding N. 8th St. and Houser Way N. (the public street was constructed in 1989 but lies partially on Boeing property). Council concur. Added Item 8.j. Finance&Information Services Department requested approval of the Finance: Special Projects reclassification of the Special Projects Specialist from Grade 20 to Grade 24, Specialist Reclassification retroactive to July 25, 1999. Council concur. MOVED BY SCHLITZER, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE Correspondence was read from Al Blake,Cedar River Hangar Limited Citizen Comment: Blake— Partnership, 749 East Perimeter Rd.,Renton, 98055,regarding Boeing's Municipal Airport Apron"C" turnback to the City of Renton portions of Apron"C"which were previously Leases used by his business for tiedown space. MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY SCHLITZER,COUNCIL REFER THIS LETTER TO THE TRANSPORTATION(AVIATION)COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Citizen Comment: Kavesh— ' Correspondence was read from Gina Kavesh,representing Renton Western Sheridan Mixed-Use Wear, 724 S.Third St.,regarding the proposed closure of the alley located Development in the behind the business. MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY KEOLKER- Downtown&Alley Closure WHEELER,COUNCIL REFER THIS LETTER TO THE PLANNING& DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Citizen Comment: Perry— Correspondence was read from Shannon Perry, American Drapery,700 S. Sheridan Mixed-Use Third St.,also regarding the proposed closure of the alley related to the Development in the Sheridan mixed-use development project in the downtown. Ms.Perry was Downtown&Alley Closure particularly concerned with the potential for interrupted telephone service due to excavation projects in this area. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, S(A- —CACI— (- ( SECONDED BY SCHLITZER,COUNCIL REFER THIS LETTER TO THE PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Councilmember Keolker-Wheeler asked that all property owners and tenants who would potentially be affected by this matter receive notice of the meeting date and time at which the committee will consider this subject. She also asked that US West be given the same information. OLD BUSINESS Transportation Committee Member Parker presented a report recommending Transportation(Aviation that Council approve the Boeing Company's release,to the City, of rRenton , , :,. ( v I V417 • r o "Quality at Reasonable Prices" 724 South 3rd Street Renton, Washington 98055 (206) 255-3922 Renton City Council City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 January 4th 2000 Re: Land Use#LUA-99-141, SA-A, ECF Application name— Sheridan Mixed Use Development Dear Renton City Council Members: I am writing this letter to request and recommend that the Renton City Council disapprove the Land Use Report request to close the public alley adjacent to the Sheridan Development. In response to the City of Renton's Environmental Review and Administrative Land Use Action report dated December 14, 1999 for the Sheridan Mixed Use Development Project I offer the following comments: Page 14 of the report states that"Staff has spoken to Ms. Kavesh and these measures would satisfy her primary concerns." Though this is technically correct,the only conversation that I had in regards to our objections with the city was of a more exploratory nature than a firm solution. Renton Western Wear, Inc. can accept a loading zone on South 3`' street as temporary arrangement but there are significant operating costs associated with this potential solution that are not addressed in the study nor did Mr. Rosen and I discuss these costs in our only conversation regarding a front access loading zone on South 3rd Street, dedicated to Renton Western Wear. Renton Western Wear's warehouse receiving and shipping is located on the second floor of the building with up/down warehouse conveyer belt and staircase located at the rear doublewide doors accessing directly onto the alley. Truck incoming and outgoing deliveries at the alley access are directly loadable to/from the conveyer and are within full security vision of employees loading and unloading trucks in the alley. A front loading zone would require transferring boxes&pallets through the retail space that: (1) is disruptive to our retail use; (2)requires physical modification to aisles and fixturing for transportation dolly clearance; (3)results in severe carpet wear and possible carpet damage; (4) requires partial breakdown and repackaging of merchandise to pass through single door openings; (5)requires additional employee(s)to transport merchandise . through the retail store and an additional employee to provide security watch at the 3`d Street loading zone while other employees are transporting the merchandise to or from the back conveyor. My letter also addressed the need for the permitting to specify the level of alley restoration to comply with city paving requirements while assuring full alley access immediately after completion of the foundation construction phase and the need for alternative parking for the loss of parking spaces behind the building. Neither issue appears to be addressed within the Land Use report. I am also concerned as to whether there is any incentive for this projected to be completed within the time frame as outlined and alley access returned to as quickly as possible Please note that Renton Western Wear,Inc. agrees that for Dally Homes to move and return garbage dumpsters to and from 3`d Street for Waste Management pickup is a reasonable and acceptable mitigation. Renton Western Wear assumes that Dally Homes will also be responsible to pay any additional fees from Waste Management associated with this temporary solution. We are also concerned as to the reliability of a construction crew rolling out dumpsters in a timely manner and request additional assurance that resulting charges occurring for any special pick up due to non-performance by the crew will paid by Dally Homes. Renton Western. Wear, Inc. hereby reaffirms our previous written protest to closing the alley. Based on the page 14 paragraph 3 statement that shoring would reduce the parking garage width 2 feet and possibly impact 66 parking spaces which I am assuming is based on Metro design criteria and probably is also based on zero infringement upon the alley. As an alternative, I suggest that the City further investigate and attempt to modify the Metro criteria or Dally regain the 2 feet by being permitted to shore 2 feet into the alley instead of proceeding with a 1:1 ten foot deep cut. A 2-foot shoring cut would easily retain sufficient alley width for truck access if alley parking were prohibited. According to the Land Use report, the applicant has proposed a 1:1 cut for the excavation solely to avoid the expense of shoring the excavation cut. My position, and hopefully that of the Council, is that the applicant's desire to avoid shoring expenses should not be allowed to transfer the resulting economic penalty to an uninvolved adjacent business owner. However, if the City Council decides to proceed with the alley closure option,then Renton Western Wear, Inc. requests the City Council to require Dally Homes to provide monetary mitigation to Renton Western Wear, Inc. for business disruption and increased operating costs as may be negotiated or arbitrated between the parties prior to Council approval for closure of the public alley. As another issue, I want the Council to know that I appreciated the prompt hand delivery of the Land Use Action report when I telephoned Mr. Rosen on December 27th, 1999 to request status of the Development application. However, I was bothered that I had not automatically been included on the report distribution particularly since I had formally responded to the application. (I have attached my previous correspondence for your reference). I do hereby request that I, and other adjacent property owners, be pre-notified of all future public hearings regarding this application and be provided timely documentation of City decisions and actions. Thank you. Sincerely, Gina Kavesh(Treasurer) P.S. I also feel the need to alert the City that the recently placed alley markings for the location of U.S. West fiber optic cables and PSE power cables shows that a 1:1 excavation would overlay a significant portion of the cable runs whereas a 2 foot shoring cut appears to avoid the cables. In as much as I am unaware if a 10 foot deep excavation risks the Renton telephone communication lines, I can only request further City assurance that the businesses and residences served by the downtown U.S. West cable network will not be interrupted by the construction. Attachments: (a) Renton Western Wear, Inc. October 26, 1999 letter to Mr. Peter Rosen (b) Renton Western Wear, Inc. October 7, 1999 letter to Ms. Sue Carlson Cc: Mr. Peter Rosen, Project Manager Ms. Jana Hanson, Zoning Administrator /i,Rentofl •-- .,- i .. -- [ -v. _,... ,, or‘c.t.tz, 4 a 1 • r ea "Quality at Reasonable Prices" ' (206) 255-3922 :'724 South 3rd Street Renton,Washington 98055 Mr.Peter Rosen,Project Manager "`• ; tr:4r Development Services Division `' 1055 South Grady Way Renton,WA 98055 -._ October 26, 1999 .....o....3, 44. Re: Land Use#'LUA-99-141, SA-A,ECF , ;:'' Application name—Sheridan Mixed Use Development Dear Mr.Rosen: _ I am concerned about the above referenced project impacting the daily, ongoing,retail business of Renton Western Wear,Inc. unless the building permit conditions are explicit . to keeping the adjacent alley open to delivery truck traffic. _ : 47,..:,,, :,..,... 4'* I have attached the letter I sent to Ms. Sue Carlson,Economic Development Director of "`, the City of Renton,and request that it be included as part of my formal comments for this t ' " ' .. , application. The letter details my concerns and possible mitigation actions that should be �_ �=�4: - ':• addressed and/or required prior to approval of the application. It should be noted that Ty= although I thought I had agreement with Mr. Don Daily on many of the paragraphs within 1_ •s t=- the letter,Mr.Daily has written to advise me that the meeting was informational only and '"a'' his comments were to only discuss potential ways our concerns could be mitigated. n? I appreciate Mr.Daily's legally appropriate response that he did not make any '',�. agreements,decisions or promises to Renton Western Wear,Inc. during our meeting. "`-. -However,I also believe our requests and discussions as reported in our letter are f reasonable and should be made part of the City's formal approval conditions and �r. . mitigation actions. I would be pleased to meet with you and Mr. Daily to further discuss �J1� the issues in detail and attempt to find mutually satisfactory solutions that can eformally ' implemented by the permitting processor by legal Agreements of Understanding -' between the involved parties. ,.•- • . t , . • .¢ ' ,, •, • My letter also reports several agreements made by Ms. Sue Carlson on behalf of the City ;:+Y of Renton. I hereby request that your office also be-involved with implementation of • ' those agreements to assure that the City behaves as a single agency protecting the rights t .r. of all contiguous property owners and users of the alley. sY� ; • Sincerely, , Gina Kavesh • >,tj Treasurer . .'t.•''=_--- Cc: Sue Carlson • - r� . Don Daily .,n4•. ta° tr,'!;.ilgt? • • a It• .,a.t • YztY; r�.--- r _e. :. • %4R 1 • l C'i • • } "r ' • (111': I t• •- • r im "Quality at Reasonable Prices" 724 South 3rd Street Renton, Washington 98055 (206) 255-3922 Sue Carlson-Economic Development Director City Of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton,WA 98055 October 7, 1999 Dear Sue, This is to confirm the agreements and decisions that were reached during the meeting between Renton Western Wear,Inc,Daily Homes,Inc.American Drapery Inc.and you during our meeting of September 30, 1999. Daily Homes anticipates construction on the Good Chevrolet location to begin approximately March 2000. The foundation construction will take place in the public alley behind Renton Western Wear, Inc.and American Drapery and the foundation construction is expected to last 12 to 16 weeks. At completion of this foundation work the alley will be re-paved back to it's original width.The final building will not infringe into the overall alley's width. As discussed,this alleyway is a vital delivery route for both Renton Western Wear,Inc.and American Drapery and can not be blocked nor obstructed for any length of time without serious financial ramifications for both businesses. American Drapery and Renton Western Wear,Inc.are prepared to take any and all necessary actions to ensure that this construction process does not adversely affect their businesses. In order alleviate undue hardship on our business and the construction process Don Daily of Daily Homes Inc.and you,representing the City of Renton,agreed to following items: Renton Western Wear,Inc.and American Drapery would be kept informed of construction and demolition schedules. The trench,necessary to pour the foundation-of the new building,which would run the length of the alley to the property line of American Drapery would be constructed so as not to impede passage of large delivery trucks. The City agreed to be responsible for negotiating with U.S. West and the Attorneys at Dobson, Houser&Davidson to prohibit parking on their adjacent alley property during this 12 to 16 week construction period to enable passage of delivery trucks. The City also agreed to negotiate and arrange alternative parking solutions for U.S.West,Dobson, Houser&Davidson and Renton Western Wear,Inc.to replace the parking eliminated for the 12 to 16 week period. (The City will provide four all day parking spots for Renton Western Wear, Inc. corporate officers since their current alley parking will be blocked by the construction and the route delivery trucks will be forced to take through the alley.) Don Daily advised that he expected the trench width to be somewhere between 4 to 9 feet wide,depending upon soil samples,and that the remaining alley access, including protective safety fencing for the trench would be sufficient for 18 wheel delivery trucks to safely deliver down the alley. Daily Homes Inc.agreed to inform Renton Western Wear, Inc and American Drapery of the width of the trench prior to construction. . dicated.that the U.S.West My subsequent review of the alley�nn ar a that effectively reduces the algley width and must be has a concrete,two oot wide,protrusion within their parking thatconsideredo when evaluating ckthe passagerc clearances. require stt is possible,tructural retaining depending t dprotect against cave-in that to provide track clearance the or soil slumping caused by heavy has significant vehicle nderground c forces or ab ing within hel water ialley that needs to be y attention that U.S.Westg • considered during excavation. The City or Daily Homes will contact Rainier Waste Management dud' fees line accessibility ed es Waste for garbage&recycle pickups. Daily Homes agreed to pay any'pushDraperyerican dum bye Waste Management for garbage and recycle pickup accessibility will of Renton Western Wear,Inc.and be maintained throughout the total responsibility for .. duration of this project. they are ballyp Homes ischede that that alley on Saturday,Sundaycess needs to be 1cted during and Holidays construction, not to interfere with responsible for scheduling normal weekday truck deliveries to Renton.Western Wear,Inc.and American Drapery. th Sue Carlson accepted responsibility to coordinate with all responsible Offices to assure and at building permits,project approval documents and vehicle safety es enforce the understandings and agreements o8oy�above.$The hip the City will lley during tha investigate t trenching establish the minimum safe clearances required errnissible trench width and shoring period atid,thereby establish the associated maximum ppermitting willn alsos ring the requirements to be included within the building permits: The City p g re-paving requirements,including fill,surface, foundation drainage canand schedule, construction phase. to return the alley to full access immediately after.completion of We did not discuss alley access once the foundation work has been completed and other work has begun. if necessary,we will then need to revisit these accessibility issues if Dally Homes requires any temporary restrictions that could impede our access. We certainly appreciate the investment Mr.Dilly and the City has made in Downtown Renton and hope that we all benefit from these exciting changes. Please advise receipt of this letter and concurrence of the above agreements and actions. Sincerely, • Gina Kavesh Treasurer • Cc: Don Daily (Daily Homes,Inc.) Dick Wilson(American Drapery) Paul(Bud)Mouser Jr.(Dobson,Houser,&Davidson) US West ,„-7:0),,, CITY TF RENTON City Clerk Jesse Tanner,Mayor Marilyn J. Petersen January 13, 1999 Ms. Gina Kavesh, Treasurer Renton Western Wear 724 South 3rd Street Renton, WA 98055 Re: Letter regarding Sheridan Mixed Use Development; LUA-99-141 Dear Ms. Kavesh: At the regular Council meeting of January 10, 2000, the Renton City Council referred the referenced letter regarding closure of the public alley adjacent to the Sheridan development to the Planning and Development Committee for review and recommendation. When this topic is scheduled on the committee agenda, the Council secretary will notify you. If I can provide additional information,please feel free to call. Sincerely, Marilyn . P t rsen City Clerk/Cable Manager cc: Mayor Jesse Tanner Council President Randy Corman Gregg Zimmerman, P/B/PW Administrator 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 - (425)430-6510 / FAX(425)430-6516 ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer /- /o - 4-0 tl DOeP (.o,e,��- • . po• ' CORPORA-� VD NATIONAL SALES OFFICES �G��� AMLIRILCAN I k- . 700 South Third Street, Renton,WA 98055 1160 DRAPERY BLIND CARPET Mailing: P.O. Box 896, Renton,WA 98057 EMPLOYEE OWNED (425)255-3893 1-800-234-4106 FAX(425)255-5266 or 1-800-669-7193 LYNNWOOD (425)670-1270 BALLARD (206)781-4993 MARYSVILLE (360)651-2500 REDMOND (425)861-1804 BELLINGHAM (360)676-1121 1-877-770-7755 SPOKANE (509)534-8000 1-800-274-4105 PORTLAND,OR (503)234-6868 1-800-234-4109 January 7, 2000 Renton City Council City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way CITY OF RENTON Renton, WA 98055 Re: Land Use#LUA-99-141,SA-A,ECF JAN 1 0 2000 Application name-Sheridan Mixed Use Development RECEIVED CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Dear City Council Members, I am writing-regarding the proposed closure of the public alley adjacent to the Sheridan Development. Let me start by saying how dismayed I am by the fact that I received word of this proposal from a neighboring business. As a retailer who will be directly impacted by the project, I feel we should be notified of all aspects of the development. In fact, in a conversation between myself, Gena Kavesh (Renton Western Wear), Sue Carlson and Don Daily on September 30, 1999,we were indeed assured we would be kept abreast of all stages. While closure of the alley will cause inconvenience and considerable expense to our company, the possibility of telephone disruption is of great concern. Our business relies almost solely on telephone communications for our revenues. In fact, we have a telemarketing division that sells exclusively over the phone. We also have a network of computers that connects are Renton location with our Indiana and Renton warehouses and our Portland store. We are anticipating the connection of our other 5 locations within the next 3 months. Any considerable down time of this system would be catastrophic. We would like to know if US West has been contacted and whether they feel a 1:1 cut for excavating would indeed impact their cables. Please let this letter serve as notice that we would like to be added as a party of record and be informed of all issues through the completion of the project. I look forward to hearing from you regarding US West. Sincerely, 3101I16Y1 AA.A.4/ Shannon Perry Secretary Cc: Gena/Jerry Kavesh, Renton Western Wear • 07) CITY OF RENTON L MIMI i,j City Clerk Jesse Tanner,Mayor Marilyn J. Petersen January 13, 1999 Ms. Shannon Perry, Secretary American Drapery/Blind/Carpet P.O. Box 896 Renton, WA 98057 Re: Letter regarding Sheridan Mixed Use Development; LUA-99-141 Dear Ms. Perry: At the regular Council meeting of January 10, 2000, the Renton City Council referred the referenced letter regarding closure of the public alley adjacent to the Sheridan development to the Planning and Development Committee for review and recommendation. When this topic is scheduled on the committee agenda, the Council secretary will notify you. If I can provide additional information,please feel free to call. Sincerely, Marilyn J. e n City Clerk/Cable Manager cc: Mayor Jesse Tanner Council President Randy Corman Gregg Zimmerman, PB/PW Administrator 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 - (425)430-6510 / FAX(425)430-6516 ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer Iik tt497 vr- • r "Quality at Reasonable Prices" 724 South 3rd Street Renton, Washington 9805u LOPMENT PtANN1NN$25) 228-6170 CITY OF RENTON QJ AN 04 2000 Renton City Council RECEIVED City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 January 4th 2000 Re: Land Use#LUA-99-141, SA-A, ECF Application name--Sheridan Mixed Use Development Dear Renton City Council Members: I am writing this letter to request and recommend that the Renton City Council disapprove the Land Use Report request to close the public alley adjacent to the Sheridan Development. In response to the City of Renton's Environmental Review and Administrative Land Use Action report dated December 14, 1999 for the Sheridan Mixed Use Development Project I offer the following comments: Page 14 of the report states that"Staff has spoken to Ms. Kavesh and these measures would satisfy her primary concerns." Though this is technically correct, the only conversation that I had in regards to our objections with the city was of a more exploratory nature than a firm solution. Renton Western Wear, Inc. can accept a loading zone on South 3rd street as temporary arrangement but there are significant operating costs associated with this potential solution that arc not addressed in the study nor did Mr. Rosen and I discuss these costs in our only conversation regarding a front access loading zone on South 3`d Street, dedicated to Renton Western Wear. Renton Western Wear's warehouse receiving and shipping is located on the second floor of the building with up/down warehouse conveyer belt and staircase located at the rear doublewide doors accessing directly onto the alley. Truck incoming and outgoing deliveries at the alley access are directly loadable to/from the conveyer and are within full security vision of employees loading and unloading trucks in the alley. A front loading zone would require transferring boxes&pallets through the retail space that: (1) is disruptive to our retail use; (2)requires physical modification to aisles and fixturing for transportation dolly clearance; (3)results in severe carpet wear and possible carpet damage; (4) requires partial breakdown and repackaging of merchandise to pass through single door openings; (5) requires additional employee(s)to transport merchandise • • • • • through the retail store and an additional employee to provide security watch at the 3rd Street loading zone while other employees are transporting the merchandise to or from the back conveyor. My letter also addressed the need for the permitting to specify the level of alley restoration to comply with city paving requirements while assuring full alley access immediately after completion of the foundation construction phase and the need for alternative parking for the loss of parking spaces behind the building. Neither issue appears to be addressed within the Land Use report. I am also concerned as to whether there is any incentive far Lids projected to be completed within the time frame as outlined and aUev acoc.sq retp cd to Lost:i Ie Please note that Renton Western Wear,Inc. agrees that for Daily Homes to move and return garbage dumpsters to and from 3id Street for Waste Management pickup is a reasonable and acceptable mitigation. Renton Western Wear assumes that Daily Homes will also be responsible to pay any additional fees from Waste Management associated with this temporary solution. We are also concerned as to the reliability of a construction crew rolling out dumpsters in a timely manner and request additional assurance that resulting charges occurring for any special pick up due to non-performance by the crew will paid by Daily Homes. Renton Western Wear, Inc. hereby reaffirms our previous written protest to closing the alley. Based on the page 14 paragraph 3 statement that shoring would reduce the parking garage width 2 feet and possibly impact 66 parking spaces which I am assuming is based on Metro design criteria and probably is also based on zero infringement upon the alley. As an alternative, I suggest that the City further investigate and attempt to modify the Metro criteria or Daily regain the 2 feet by being permitted to shore 2 feet into the alley instead of proceeding with a 1:1 ten foot deep cut. A 2-foot shoring cut would easily retain sufficient alley width for truck access if alley parking were prohibited. According to the Land Use report, the applicant has proposed a 1:1 cut for the excavation solely to a void the e :e `a .��'. ! ,�,,;:� the I _. t oit w.. �`,:'S r Y: ...,..:" -nd i.`.,,y�.>!'.Mi�a.: It of tb.`:. � ii:Y., is � .,ic: : �� u v':a.0 ': " a...:"a -.,Y,� Council, is that the applicant's desire to avoid shoring expenses should not be allowed to transfer the resulting economic penalty to an uninvolved adjacent business owner. However, if the City Council decides to proceed with the alley closure option,then Renton Western Wear, Inc. requests the City Council to require Daily Homes to provide monetary mitigation to Renton Western Wear, Inc. for business disruption and increased operating costs as may be negotiated or arbitrated between the parties prior to Council approval for closure of the public alley. As another issue, I want the Council to know that I appreciated the prompt hand delivery of the Land Use Action report when I telephoned Mr. Rosen on December 27th, 1999 to request status of the Development application. However, I was bothered that I had not automatically been included on the report distribution particularly since I had formally responded to the application. (l have attached my previous correspondence for your reference). I do hereby reclu.est that I, and other adjacent property owners,be pre-notified of all future public hearings regarding this application and be provided timely documentation of City decisions and actions. Thank you. Sincerely, Gina Kavesh(Treasurer) P.S. I also feel the need to alert the City that the recently placed alley markings for the location of U.S. West fiber optic cables and PSE power cables shows that a 1:1 excavation would overlay a significant portion of the cable runs whereas a 2 foot shoring cut appears to avoid the cables. In as much as I am unaware if a 10 foot deep excavation risks the Renton telephone communication lines, I can only request further City assurance that the businesses and residences served by the downtown U.S. West cable network will not be interrupted by the ;.ots trz=.ction. Attachments: (a) Renton Western.Wear, Inc. October 26, 1999 letter to Mr. Peter Rosen (b) Renton Western Wear, inc. October 7, 1999 letter to Ms. Sue Carlson Cc: Mr. Peter Rosen, Project M.aaages Ms. Jana Hanson, Zoning Administrator • lik-sJ, enton '' r ® °A's!197 •— "Quality at Reasonable Prices" 724 South 3rd Street Renton, Washington 98055 (206) 255-3922 Sue Carlson-Economic Development Director City Of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton,WA 98055 October 7, 1999 Dear Sue, This is to confirm the agreements and decisions that were reached during the meeting between Renton Western Wear,Inc,Daily Homes,Inc.American Drapery Inc.and you during our meeting of September 30, 1999. Daily Homes anticipates construction on the Good Chevrolet location to begin approximately March 2000. The foundation construction will take place in the public alley behind Renton Western Wear,Inc.and American Drapery and the foundation construction is expected to last 12 to 16 weeks.At completion of this foundation work the alley will be re-paved back to it's original width.The final building will not infringe into the overall alley's width. As discussed,this alleyway is a vital delivery route for both Renton Western Wear,Inc.and American Drapery and can not be blocked nor obstructed for any length of time without serious financial ramifications for both businesses. American Drapery and Renton Western Wear,Inc.are prepared to take any and all necessary actions to ensure that this construction process does not adversely affect their businesses. In order alleviate undue hardship on our business and the construction process Don Daily of Daily Homes Inc.and you,representing the City of Renton,agreed to following items: Renton Western Wear,Inc.and American Drapery would be kept informed of construction and demolition schedules. The trench,necessary to pour the foundation of the new building,which would run the length of the alley to the property line of American Drapery would be constructed so as not to impede passage of large delivery trucks. The City agreed to be responsible for negotiating with U.S.West and the Attorneys at Dobson,Houser&Davidson to prohibit parking on their adjacent alley property during this 12 to 16 week construction period to enable passage of delivery trucks. The City also agreed to negotiate and arrange alternative parking solutions for U.S.West,Dobson, Houser&Davidson and Renton Western Wear,Inc.to replace the parking eliminated for the 12 to 16 week period." '('The City will provide four all day parking spots for Renton Western Wear, Inc. corporate officers since their current alley parking will be blocked by the construction and the route delivery trucks will be forced to take through the alley.) Don Daily advised that he expected the trench width to be somewhere between 4 to 9 feet wide,depending upon soil samples,and that the remaining alley access, including protective safety fencing for the trench would be sufficient for 18 wheel delivery trucks to safely deliver down the alley. Daily Homes Inc.agreed to inform Renton Western Wear,Inc and American Drapery of the width of the trench prior to construction. • My subsequent review of the alley indicated that the U.S. West building has a concrete,two foot wide,protrusion within their parking area that effectively reduces the alley width and must be considered when evaluating truck passage clearances. It is possible,depending on soil conditions, that to provide truck clearance the trench will require structural retaining to protect against cave-in or soil slumping caused by heavy vehicle forces or natural water conditions. It also came to my attention that U.S.West has significant underground cabling within the alley that needs to be considered during excavation. The City or Daily Homes will contact Rainier Waste Management and determine accessibility for garbage&recycle pickups. Daily Homes agreed to pay any'push out' fees charged by Waste Management for pickup of Renton Western Wear,Inc.and American Drapery dumpsters. Daily responsibility for garbage and recycle pickup accessibility will be maintained throughout the total duration of this project. Daily Homes is aware that if alley access needs to be restricted during construction,they are responsible for scheduling that work on Saturday,Sunday and Holidays so as not to interfere with normal weekday truck deliveries to Renton Western Wear,Inc.and American Drapery. Sue Carlson accepted responsibility to coordinate with all responsible City Offices to assure that building permits,project approval documents and vehicle safety issues are all compatible and enforce the understandings and agreements noted above.The City will investigate and establish the minimum safe clearances required for 18 wheel trucks within the alley during the trenching period and thereby establish the associated maximum permissible trench width and shoring requirements to be included within the building permits: The City permitting will also specify the re-paving requirements,including fill,surface,drainage and schedule,to return the alley to full access,immediately after completion of the foundation construction phase. We did not discuss alley access once the foundation work has been completed and other work has begun. If necessary,we will then need to revisit these accessibility issues if Daily Homes requires any temporary restrictions that could impede our access. We certainly appreciate the investment Mr. Daily and the City has made in Downtown Renton and hope that we all benefit from these exciting changes. Please advise receipt of this letter and concurrence of the above agreements and actions. Sincerely, Gina Kavesh Treasurer • Cc: Don Daily (Daily Homes, Inc.) Dick Wilson(American Drapery) Paul(Bud)Houser Jr.(Dobson,Houser,&Davidson) US West f %Renton ,, . ,, ,, , , , • �- 6 v— r ®e "Quality at Reasonable Prices" . 724 South 3rd Street Renton,Washington 98055 (206) 255-3922 jj,a7rt 8(Y f, t, A- Mr. Peter Rosen,Project Manager Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 October 26, 1999 . Re: Land Use#LUA-99-141, SA-A, ECF Application name—Sheridan Mixed Use Development Dear Mr. Rosen: I am concerned about the above referenced project impacting the daily, ongoing,retail business of Renton Western Wear, Inc. unless the building permit conditions are explicit to keeping the adjacent alley open to delivery truck traffic. 4, ' I have attached the letter I sent to Ms. Sue Carlson,Economic Development Director of k,1 the City of Renton,and request that it be included as part of my formal comments for this application. The letter details my concerns and possible mitigation actions that should be addressed and/or required prior to approval of the application. It should be noted that although I thought I had agreement with Mr. Don Daily on many of the paragraphs within the letter, Mr. Daily has written to advise me that the meeting was informational only and k. his comments were to only discuss potential ways our concerns could be mitigated. I appreciate Mr. Daily's legally appropriate response that he did not make any agreements,decisions or promises to Renton Western Wear, Inc. during our meeting. ., However,I also believe our requests and discussions as reported in our letter are .r,: -0 reasonable and should be made part of the City's formal approval conditions and ' .N mitigation actions. I would be pleased to meet with you and Mr. Daily to further discuss . the issues in detail and attempt to find mutually satisfactory solutions that can be formally implemented by the permitting processor by legal Agreements of Understanding x ''• ' between the involved parties. L • ya.: :n. •' „ •:. My letter also reports several agreements made by Ms. Sue Carlson on behalf of the City of Renton. I hereby request that your office also be involved with implementation of those agreements to assure that the City behaves as a single agency protecting the rights of all contiguous property owners and users of the alley. Sincerely, Gina Kavesh Treasurer Cc: Sue Carlson Don Dally City of Seattle Paul Schell, Mayor Seattle Public Utilities Diana Gale, Director DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON JAN 04 2000 December 30, 1999 RECEIVED Bob Gambill Seattle Public Utilities Real Property Services- WTR do 10th floor mail room Dexter Horton Building 710 Second Avenue Seattle, WA 98104-1714 Mr. Peter Rosen City of Renton Planning/Building/Public Works Department 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 RE: Sheridan Mixed Use Development— LUA-99-141,SA-A,ECF Dear Mr. Rosen: Thank you for including Seattle Public Utilities (SPU) in your circulation of notices for development projects. The purpose of this letter is to provide notice that; The Seattle Public Utilities operates 3 major water transmission pipelines in close proximity to this project: (See attached exhibits) • Cedar River Pipeline#1 (CRPL#1) is located in South 2"d St. It is 66 inches in diameter. • Cedar River Pipeline#2 (CRPL#2) is located in South 3rd St. It is 66 inches in diameter. • Cedar River Pipeline #3 (CRPL#3) is located in South 3rd St. It is 51% in diameter. These 3 transmission pipelines supply most of the water for the King County population living south and east of Lake Washington. Due to the volume of water in these pipelines, if they should be breached the damage to the surrounding area could be significant. SPU should be consulted if any of the following work is to be performed in the vicinity of these pipelines. (Call SPU's Lake Youngs Headquarters at 425-255-2242 at least 48 hours in advance) • Locating by potholing. (must be supervised by SPU) • Excavation_nr construction.__ Dexter Horton Building, 10th Floor,710 Second Avenue,Seattle,WA 98104 Tel:(206)684-5851,TTY/TDD:(206)233-7241,Fax:(206)684-4631,Internet Address:http://www.ci.seattle.wa.us/util/ An equal employment opportunity,affirmative action employer.Accommodations for people with disabilities provided upon request. • Operation of heavy equipment. (Pipe protection may be needed if unusually heavy equipment crosses the pipeline) Utility installations which cross, or are in the proximity of, our pipeline: • Utility crossings of our pipeline should be at a right angle to it, or parallel with the centerline of a controlling intersection. • We prefer 10 feet of horizontal separation from our pipeline for parallel installations. • There should be at least 12" of vertical separation between our pipeline and another water line, or cable, and at least 18" of vertical separation between our pipeline and a sewer line or storm drain. • Catch basins should not be located within 10 feet of our pipeline. Shallow curb inlets can be closer than 10 feet if the drain line diverts the water to a catch basin at a remote location. • Ductile Iron (joints pressure tested), Steel Pipe, or a Steel Casing should be used for all utilities which cross our pipeline. If Ductile Iron is used, one section must be centered on our pipeline so that the section joints are not over or under any portion of our pipeline. Information SPU may need • Three copies of scalable Plan, Section and Profile drawings that show the planned improvements in proximity to our pipeline. These plans will be reviewed for comment by SPU Operations. • The planned start and finish dates. Information the developer/contractor may need • As-built plans of our facilities can be obtained from the City of Seattle Vault which is located at the 8th floor of the City of Seattle Municipal Building, 600 - 4th Ave., Seattle, 98104. Jack Tipton is the supervisor. His number is 206-684-5132. • The plan numbers are: CRPL #1 is #777-313, CRPL #2 is #860-56, and CRPL #3 is #777-298. If anyone connected with this project should need additional information please contact me at 206) 684-5969 or e-mail bob.gambill@ci.seattle.wa.us. Sincerely, :)6)'7) di*" Bob Gambill Sr. Real Property Agent Copies: To File, Joe Mickelson Attachments: Diagram, showing approximate location of CRPL's #1, #2, and #3. • 3 I 8 • 327 i \ 0 \ \\ \ \\,\, , , 1 N.I¢ ST. 1 1 / 1I J 1 P, E N T O N co I • ' I o �o 1 1 1I 6•MES � 'P o',pox MS >_ I R P O R T Psy. 581 k M� IC METERS '� `-` • to BO£I N G CO. i V ,` v.,,,„AI M1149554 ,\ i '0•, I i 5. AIRPORT I ' r AY az-w R QR R Si.raa \ . WSo.7`/LL/K!/(t JT 0 Q I i \ ] \ So.TOB/N L'r jit 5o. IV ST: _ 12"MAINS ONE BY 0.vlcT /A S T. BOO MG" h• ui in JR. HIGH N " Q 48O HIGH N • , s SCHOOL UI ; 10 >in9 per In _ _ •Wir/On ♦6'N dQ.nil 1 N /sG,n 1,59 l. '� .x''�" 19T c ;q' . I . in 30PL.RrW `O, ' r� sil.. �'/J C ..lS„6R M' . RELiNtD vaun Plan N TT7 21 ♦t y1 'P1nx/r. _ •_-�� . :T P�3 6!0te "SlJ`o.2/pt lt•N •. i [ 1 __ p __ ��.�s�1 ` \ 3 2 8 H 1444"l 2, RELINED �t ES�y ..1 t � i o!E Pierr N • •_ Va,i1t p1aA ''[ A LS'N `J '.'i�' •.L�� cw Hp 111-313 LSN h5 .4800395. B.O.a 'P 3 A.tt~ SS t..e #�i Izrt ��u �i Q +2d..e. ,..;_st.).. (... / RELINED <. . A� £v��[v.w 1Nu ill 860-36 . pmM N. is‘I . I fE 4 `� " wM Sa,jno. -6 r. 0 --3.,..- ,...,, a`. acre w dot Al C M i3.K..[lr V 1 .S\N 3 m PL. VI / 5o r Q � � m I .sn +mil ,,T 1 Iti I I I r— - ,' .. \ 7-1)9 . 3. 2 n tioq / -, _ . .,r1=-- " ss's \ \,.._-' F___. _ , u: s. Ilil ssj , \ 8 *" ...1 ECI , ,,, ,,%''3 18 I C H 0 ni_ D l(S T R, I '.•,I ,l1, ---L L\ _ - emMEs.I .g11li1i7 L __ , „ , .9 60 — 0 - 3M af:aRl .. 0 1 r 421)• ) - t 8 in , 1 , 1 , t..i I 1 2 • L-----;,,„ 'Alf.$ ' Om a 9 Milil 1 , 20.75 Ac. _a ,5., , , . SIN•se am / i • ------ 'Si , • I. . .- 10 its •lin f c / Cg.*:9_ .,. . _$. • .. L.. . , 11111".41.41/111/1 .,K op, ..-- f r iv Itii,i 'la ---- -n-,--- g a, (r) ' AK ic10 1:1 lot A •• , ileTLA a, -:-Ti---7-4 r. 40 b 1., 1.4 -._, p I,- W1117111ffifiti : I k5 I.i 7 /20 '4‹c:'.4444254111t,,,, ' : ! all, -4________ .• ' `-' `1.----7, - :4.11 I I 2 I 9 •: 12 * 6' . ., %I' 1 g' W5 ,‘, ,...1 . OM ___g____ , imi :, . ,t ,..., _ 6 ?,. an 11 ,os ti 7••, ' Z• . , 1 4<ipLCC,N 6 • 7°5C4 ". ›,3'*•x....-- --C)14-' allit4t4iii't :; Lii=TS 5 • • HV 6 * ma so uppi 213k 220 ti i• -----z...--- IP 4 'eONI ,N . \ 1 1 . --a •' 5 . . -_____ 1 •• d roc -,---3-----.;,‘ 0;• 'v. 0 w.5",-,, ' F--:-:-::"%alai. ,a TL 184 1%1--A.— -1'-1 ,a; _ •_.:-•• ,,M NI,i.; Z ,lot. ---:::'lb-. ', 3'1 16. , On 14 ies.A- FANNING Li 4 - • -,-3 it, 1,,: ' 4 ! i iamb,.-1.4.-.....„ L:a.,p3t p-3- 1-p ? I -21 6 t. - • /••-. j u) 1 -,-, -::.:,*4%. 9 -127'. • ' !. . . , • •4; AT:n, odOME II .WINNIni' 51 4, ,. .,,." .- 1151-t;:::.::,t..:..€(.:3---_ , ,90‘ _-, . p is', ro 5'4 ,..... S• ,0 l C C. . 34D ST c_-,o 9 . ---,:z-s:.z.,. 1,--------... — - ,i_ ___ . -,- ., -...------ — ... . ., MIMI- 1 -iid '-`1111 1,1,1 in 0 „ , 4J -I 4U ,41,- 44 0 i sf i en ;3-sli 42' r' illiV-11 fill , 41111 4 3 7. 1 memo unagills . Ai]. 1 K., -----lelifi _... . 6 u i Mr al AY r_ , 7 •la . ElEi 7 'lie. ...... . 1. "a 4 irE ----- - • . 8 23KEI, , in 8 rim [23 3 1 ilita .nu 8 v 23 g (51 . ,..i .rimui st f iiiE1 ..._ . - 3 1 22 • . rap ,...: ct- -.D gifill 9 1 t DIA i :0 9.i kti elk., 01'4 1._ 1/ 321 i0 4 2i IMI . - Egl IC le giE : 14.711W • 320 10"j 21 ‘ • 0.6.17R-.6. 323 cii,v7c1 :1324:q II - Egli' • Eirim ,„ Jul 10 ac,.. • . m, II , 327 ' • 1:9 1 i Eli) . ------- I -.'i Edi 19 a 12 , •• • 01 IP ii 0 D., . HiJRCii _. ______ 40 13 g, :3 al • . 336 i3 13 i 8 II.4,4v rgripill.. 'ENO ____: ,,,,_ I., 7 slet. !pa__ I, 4111911111111 go 14 i --I. 3" WilliarliZ -I 15-1 kiKaimila sill:EEO Illgitiii! . 20 15 ffr,7P'--, : . ;35thrf...13 4TH X ST ,- .. .%,,,, ToNKIN ,, c.,,,,,c • A al" ..rcir ',Pi— LL1 " gia- - 6,-, [,,,,/,• ,4„„. _ .., SO 7$S- . 0---- . 44 0t 1 1 IESE• qt-i-i .)-5-, • 172 -. - - '• ) :..-1-1-- le) % fig.! ' 1 ,-- • . L 1. 4 19E3- . co 3 22 Mit .V • ....,,, lig, a 1 r.#0.0.00--' so FiZT :Em a, . 4 fig tr -•-r.' LEEnIl-786."2 1I19S7 t71nE 9.•,., r --.I-1I1T'-68a.--.-j-.4,-.z-:t-•=-. ..-60-.i4t-m.-.-i-4."•7-0--41,-01--56‘ .-.-/,'''-.'.‘'../cr'?•'.??. ....• . - -47.ki OP_P 5 rtW-i-SpJ,-• - -:: , il 1415 - ar < -,, z 4 r--10-• .-43---igF Ct 1.-; 5,1113 ,- c .., Fil. 7 ... 1., -- --.3-1-44 __ .1 • /.. f • — AXE % :/g3 8 EN ia ,,,,, .. i •,- 4.9iri • FInt 0 $ 14 dm• . '-4 14-3 iln ,-4.‘qg ••• „-.'"-4- 3 '.1 . ;.. 9 'a -' ti ct • El 10 •11 i3 M- c •' ' F2 9 i•i, 01 El '7, Jo r , gyi 10 ,.... ,,, , 'I, . . • 'game 17046 , cub.= s'`'. '5" •- ' ';'T . • . . CITY IF RENTON ..12214 Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator • January 4, 2000 Mr. Charles Laboda Daily Homes, Inc. 3316 Fuhrman Avenue East#100 Seattle, WA 98102 SUBJECT: Sheridan Mixed Use Development Project No. LUA-99-141,SA-A,ECF Dear Mr. Laboda: This letter is to inform you that the comment and appeal periods have ended for the Environmental Review Committee's (ERC) Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the above-referenced project. No appeals were filed. This decision is final and application for the appropriately required permits may proceed. The applicant must comply with all ERC Mitigation Measures and Site Plan Conditions of Approval. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (425)430-7219. For the Environmental Review Committee, gk,s Peter Rosen Project Manager cc: Daily Homes, Inc./Owners Sheridan Properties LLC FINAL 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, Washington 98055 • CITY OF.:.RENTON • CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION • AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING::. On the 1-11�' day of Dec- --v- , 1999, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing 1 �oVt Dec,is documents. This information was sent to: Name `` Representing Y\e-1rl�3vn 'RD tpeOttcs3 Ciao- tk oc DikiaLt ttovinei (Signature of Sender) Sav Lt 14 • - STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that 5( ,,.ar o. 'k_ 5� �, signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the' uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. ZZ MARILYN KAMCHEFF Notary Public in nd for the State of Was i ton NOTARY PUBLIC Notary (Print) MARILYN KAMCHEFF STATE OF WASHINGTON My appointmerW INTMENT EXPIRES:6-29-03 COMMISSIONIONEXPIRES .' JUNE 29, 2003 Project Name: Srie)(Lcan tiv\ 3(.12AUS e. oeUtiorti .7 Project Number: LUf\. 99 , 14l , SPt -6 I Lai" NOTARY.DOC .! 1 City of Renton REPORT Department of Planning/Building/Public Works & ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW& DECISION ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION REPORT DATE: December 14, 1999 Project Name: Sheridan Mixed Use Development Applicant: Daily Homes Owner: Daily Homes File Number: LUA-099-141, SA-A, ECF Project Manager: Peter Rosen Project Description: Proposal to demolish the existing Good Chevrolet auto service building and construct a 4-story mixed use structure with a basement. The proposed building would contain a Metro park and ride with 150 stalls, 90 multi-family residential units with 90 stalls of associated parking, and approximately 4,100 sq. ft. of commercial area. The proposal is subject to design guidelines under the Urban Center Design Overlay Regulations. Project Location: 232 Burnett Avenue S., Burnett Avenue S. between 2nd and 3rd Avenue S. Exist. Bldg. Area: Not provided. Proposed New Bldg. Area: 83,000 sq. ft. residential 77,000 sq. ft. parking garage 4,100 sq. ft. commercial 164,100 sq. ft. total Site Area: 42,061 sq. ft., 0.97 acres Total Building Area: NA \.1 Aj M "'iii��ffff�� ��..1,,� 'q,� nw� i a /.:4",j`—ttti*, e.'!_.. �i1/V ., mil/ �• -ly' :�...i' .-\ `— i r ...1 •\ ,t . - V If - . oLC! :.. a" I Tr: ra 0 t Ma MCC no '•. l�cJ61 7 mg .. :, •:.• plliQ1,'. ✓gyp �® ma : ., : -,:.• .• A nQ IRE . Iv/ '' a... . A ,, ' .• w: --,, -1..:..1,1 -t- : I� ICE& '' t gm l® $ CM ..n •'• ■ g . : , .r T A .. % maim i,Ffr' isNiebleiiiiai R Win a • .� . It , c •. `_ on. ,o "N. :`Q. . of ao .. i 'i O./ . ' 8 i_ '` • :° , dI , At`. ��. TT*!'s e'i ' y^;••4-- .a{ . . p, F�.! ,.,eot, .."xo t i p - ma`s t r t r+ r / .� Project Location Map ` - i° T ;- r i,J �.* A,r{ ,.' SITERC.doc "'SSSSS —�- ' .;.J1 a .,, /.li:\+sy,. i '" ..f, x,�,•. �0/f;�,,.._.•. •.I�c.o`Nt .,.,b^ `.'.i" . �: A• City of Renton P/8/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Environs 9l Review Committee Staff Report • SHERIDAN MIXED USE DEVELOPME!i LUA-99-141, SA-A, ECF ' REPORT OF DECEMBER 14, 1999 Page 2 of 22 PART ONE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND Proposal to demolish the existing Good Chevrolet auto service building and construct a 4-story mixed use structure with a basement. The proposed building would contain a Metro park and ride lot with 150 stalls, 90 multi-family residential units with 90 stalls of associated parking, and approximately 4,100 sq. ft. of commercial area. The upper three building stories would be for the 90 residential units and would be constructed as two separate buildings on top of the parking garage structure. Landscaped courtyards above the parking garage would break up and surround the two residential buildings. The residential floors would be accessed from three lobbies, two on Burnett Avenue S. and one on S. 2nd Street. The Metro park and ride would be located at the street and basement levels. Auto access to the parking garage would enter off S. 2nd Street. The parking garage would have a pedestrian link to the adjacent transit center on Burnett Ave. S. Parking for the residential units would be at the basement level and would be isolated from the Metro parking. The 4,100 sq. ft. of commercial space would be located at the corner of Burnett Avenue S. and S. 2nd Street. The proposal is subject to design guidelines under the Urban Center Design Overlay Regulations. PART TWO: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW In compliance with RCW 43.21C.240, the following project environmental review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. A. Environmental Impacts The Proposal was circulated and reviewed by various City Departments and Divisions to determine whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed development. Staff reviewers have identified that the proposal is likely to have the following probable impacts: 1. Earth Impacts: The subject site is basically flat and the site is covered with an existing building. The lower level of the parking garage would require excavating approximately 10 feet below the existing grade. No fill material is expected to be imported. The applicant has not provided an estimate of the quantity of material anticipated to be removed with excavation. A geotechnical report for the proposal has been prepared by Geotech Consultants, Inc. (dated July 2, 1999). Soil borings on the north area of the site encountered medium dense to dense, gravelly sand at a relatively shallow depth. The southern borings encountered loose sands to a depth of about 20 feet, overlying medium dense to dense sands. Groundwater seepage was encountered at a depth of 19 feet. The geotechnical report concludes that the proposed building could be supported on conventional spread SITERC.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Environi al Review Committee Staff Report • ' SHERIDAN MIXED USE DEVELOPMEN, LUA-99-141, SA-A, ECF REPORT OF DECEMBER 14, 1999 Page 3 of 22 foundations on the northern portion of the site, however, it would require piers for the southern portion. The transition between the two foundation types will not be known until the excavation of the site occurs. Therefore, the structural plans should include details for both types of foundation systems. Considering the soil and groundwater conditions, and the proximity of buildings that are probably supported on conventional foundations, the geotechnical consultant recommends that augercast concrete piers be used as the deep foundation system. The proposed structure includes one level of subsurface parking. This would require excavation approximately 10 feet deep for the area of the building footprint. The geotechnical report recommends an excavation cut of a maximum inclination of 1:1 (horizontal:vertical) for temporary slopes above groundwater at the subject site. Shoring would be required where this inclination cannot be maintained. The applicant proposes to maintain a 1:1 cut for excavating along the east and west sides of the proposed building to avoid the need for shoring. The proposed building has a zero setback to property lines. Therefore, the excavation cut would extend approximately 10 feet into the Burnett Avenue S. street right-of-way and also 10 feet into the public alley abutting the site to the east. Impacts related to the street and alley closures are discussed below under the Transportation element. The existing Good Chevrolet building on the site is directly abutting the American Drapery building to the south. The applicant is proposing soldier-pile shoring along the south building elevation to support the American Drapery building. At this time it is not known whether the American Drapery building is supported by a deep foundation system or a conventional foundation. During design of the shoring system, the foundation of the adjacent building would be determined. Surcharge loads from the adjacent structure would be considered in the shoring system and also incorporated in the design of the permanent building wall. Regardless of the measures taken to reduce ground vibrations and to limit the size of the excavation, with an excavation of this size there is always some risk of causing settlement in adjacent, conventionally supported buildings and on-grade elements. The geotechnical report recommends the following measures in order to document conditions, protect the applicant, and to monitor construction impacts: 1) Complete a thorough documentation of the condition of surrounding buildings, pavements and sidewalks prior to beginning demolition activities. 2) Install benchmarks on neighboring buildings to monitor them for settlement. These benchmarks should be placed and initially surveyed before building demolition starts. 3) Caution the demolition contractor to minimize strong impacts, such as breaking up large pieces of concrete by dropping them or striking them with the excavator bucket, wherever possible. 4) Monitor the shoring walls for movement as soon as the soldier piles are in place. To minimize the potential impacts of construction on surrounding properties during excavation, staff recommends that the applicant be required to follow the recommendations of the geotechnical report. Potential erosion impacts that could occur during construction would be mitigated by City Code requirements for a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) and Construction Mitigation Plan, approved prior to issuance of Construction Permits. SITERC.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Environr 31 Review Committee Staff Report SHERIDAN MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT LUA-99-141, SA-A, ECF REPORT OF DECEMBER 14, 1999 Page 4 of 22 Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall follow the recommendations of the Geotechnical Engineering Study, dated July 2, 1999, prepared by Geotech Consultants, Inc., regarding design criteria for foundations and retaining walls, excavation and shoring measures, etc. Policy Nexus: Environmental Ordinance. 2. Water Impacts: A preliminary storm drainage report for the proposal has been prepared by Group Four Inc. (dated October 4, 1999). The site is presently covered with a building structure that would be demolished for the proposed structure. As the site is currently impervious, no net increase in runoff is anticipated. Runoff from the proposed structure would be collected and conveyed underground to the existing storm sewer conveyance system. According to the drainage report, the existing downstream drainage system should be adequate, as the volume of runoff would not be increased. The covered parking garage would have floor drains connected directly to the sanitary sewer system. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are recommended. Policy Nexus: NA 3. Fire Protection Impacts: The proposal would add new construction to the City and would potentially impact the City's Fire Department. A Fire Mitigation Fee applies to all new construction at a rate of $388 per multi-family unit, and $0.52 per square foot for the commercial area of the building. The basement parking area is included in the fee for the residential part of the building. The Fire Mitigation Fee for the 90 multi-family units is estimated to be $34,920 (90 units X $388 = $34,920). Fire mitigation fees for the commercial portion of the building is estimated to be $2,132 (4,100 sq. ft. X $0.52 = $2,132). The total Fire Mitigation Fee is estimated to be $37,052. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to issuance of Building Permits. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee equal to $388 per multi-family unit and $0.52 per square foot for the commercial area of the building. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Policy Nexus: Fire Mitigation Fee Resolution and adopting ordinance, Environmental Review (SEPA) 4. Transportation Impacts: Auto access to the parking garage would enter off S. 2nd Street. The parking garage has two levels, a basement level and a street level. A Metro park and ride would be located at the street and basement levels and would include 150 parking stalls. The parking garage would include 90 stalls for the 90 residential units and this parking would be isolated from the Metro parking. The parking garage includes a pedestrian link to the adjacent transit center on Burnett Ave. S. The residential floors would be accessed from three lobbies, two on Burnett Avenue S. and one on S. 2nd Street. The proposed multi-family, commercial development, and the park and ride would result in an increase in the number of traffic trips on the local street system. The amount of additional traffic that would be generated is not anticipated to result in a significant impact on the local street system. A Traffic Mitigation Fee will be assessed based on SITERC.doc • City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Environr 11 Review Committee Staff Report SHERIDAN MIXED USE DEVELOPMEN, LUA-99-141, SA-A, ECF REPORT OF DECEMBER 14, 1999 Page 5 of 22 the number of average daily trips attributed to the proposed development. The number of trips is based on standards from the ITE Trip Generation Manual. The applicant will be credited for the traffic trips estimated from the existing auto sales and service building on the site. Plan Review staff estimates a total net increase of 553.24 average daily trips. The Traffic Mitigation Fee is calculated to be $75 per average daily trip. The Traffic Mitigation Fee is thus estimated to be $41,493. The parking garage includes 90 parking stalls for the 90 residential units. The subject site is located in the Downtown Core Area which specifically exempts development projects from on-site parking code requirements. Parking Regulations outside the Downtown Core Area require 1.5 spaces per multi-family unit and then 1 guest parking space per 4 dwelling units. If this standard were applied to the subject proposal, 158 parking spaces would be required. The project site is located directly across from the new Renton Transit Center. It may be assumed that residents of the proposed project would utilize transit at a proportionately higher rate. As part of an agreement with Metro, the applicant would provide transit passes to project residents. The applicant proposes to maintain a 1:1 cut for excavating along the east and west sides of the proposed building. The excavation cut would extend approximately 10 feet into the Burnett Avenue S. street right-of-way and also 10 feet into the public alley abutting the site to the east. The excavation along Burnett Avenue S. is planned to coincide with City work on the transit center and street/utility improvements. Therefore, the City has already planned for closure of the east lanes of Burnett Avenue S. The applicant would need to apply for and receive approval from the City Council for closure of the public alley to the east of the proposed site. Staff will recommend conditions for approval of the alley closure to ensure that adjacent businesses would be able to receive deliveries and trash pickup during the 3 to 4 month duration of the alley closure. The applicant has submitted a Construction Mitigation Plan stating that construction hours would be limited to 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. Monday through Saturday. Truck hauling hours are limited to between 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. under the Development Guideline Ordinance in order to avoid conflicts with peak hour traffic. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of $75 for each average daily trip attributed to the project. The traffic mitigation fee is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. Policy Nexus: Transportation Mitigation Fee Resolution, Environmental Ordinance. 5. Parks and Recreation Impacts: The proposal would result in construction of 90 multi-family residential units. Future residents would make use of existing and future City park and recreation facilities throughout the City. In order to mitigate the impact of the development on the City's park and recreation facilities the City has adopted a mitigation fee of $354.51 per new multi- family dwelling unit. The Parks Mitigation fee is estimated to be $31,905.90. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall pay a Park's Department mitigation fee of $354.51 per multi-family dwelling unit. The Parks Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. Policy Nexus: Parks Mitigation Fee Resolution, Environmental Ordinance. SITERC.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Environr, it Review Committee Staff Report SHERIDAN MIXED USE DEVELOPMEh, LUA-99-141, SA-A,ECF REPORT OF DECEMBER 14, 1999 Page 6 of 22 6. Environmental Health/Noise Impacts: A Phase 2 Environmental Site Assessment was prepared for the subject site by Geotech Consultants Inc. (dated July 14, 1999). The report was completed due to the prior use of the property for an auto repair garage and body shop. The results of borings indicate no large-scale impacts due to the use of USTs and hydraulic hoists. However, localized pockets of potential contamination may exist that were not detected in isolated explorations. Because of the extensive excavation planned, the report concludes that the construction budget should include some contingency for assessment, analysis and disposal of soils that may contain detectable contamination. Development of the site would result in noise impacts. These impacts would be limited to the construction phase of the project, estimated to be have a total duration of approximately 14 months (March 2000 to May 2001). The applicant has submitted a Construction Mitigation Plan which includes measures to minimize construction impacts. Construction equipment noise would be mitigated by muffling equipment as required per standard construction standards and dust would be controlled using best management construction practices. The noise impacts are not considered significant due to the limited duration of the construction period and mitigations restricting the hours of construction and minimizing equipment noise. Construction of a part of the building foundation is likely to include augercast concrete piers to extend through the loose soils underlying the site. The geotechnical report recommends this type of deep foundation construction to minimize the impact of ground vibrations during the earthwork and foundation construction on adjacent buildings. Future residents of the proposed project would be subjected to noise and activity normal to an urban center. The project site is located beneath a heavily traveled aerial route utilized by aircraft approaching and/or departing Renton Airport. Aircraft fly at low altitudes over or in the near vicinity of the site. Noise from aircraft could impact future residents of the apartment proposal. The applicant should consider this impact and incorporate insulation and sound-deadening design materials. After completion of the project, there would be noise impacts of increased traffic and impacts from activities normally associated with an introduced residential population. The Comprehensive Plan and zoning envisions downtown Renton as an urban center with a variety of residential and commercial uses developed at a high-density, intensity level. The potential conflicts between uses and impacts of airport and transit noise were known factors with the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan and zoning for downtown. The potential noise impacts on residents are not considered of a significant magnitude to warrant imposition of mitigation measures. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are recommended. Policy Nexus: NA 7. Land Use and Aesthetics Impacts: The subject site is located in the Center Downtown (CD) Comprehensive Plan map and Zoning designation. The proposal includes multi-family residential, commercial development, and a park and ride use which are consistent with the policies of the Comprehensive Plan and the uses permitted in the CD zoning designation. Potential impacts of residential construction and uses in the downtown were evaluated during the process of adopting the Comprehensive Plan and implementing zoning in 1993 to 1995. It is anticipated that the proposed residential and commercial uses would be compatible SITERC.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Environr it Review Committee Staff Report SHERIDAN MIXED USE DEVELOPMEty, LUA-99-141, SA-A, ECF REPORT OF DECEMBER 14, 1999 Page 7 of 22 with existing, surrounding land uses and the future land use types envisioned under the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code. The average height of the proposed building at the parapets is approximately 45 feet above the ground level. The maximum building height is 50 feet. Therefore, the highest building elevation would be approximately 95 feet above sea level, which meets the Airport zoning horizontal surface height limit of 179 feet above sea level. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are recommended. Policy Nexus: NA. B. Recommendation Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINATION OF DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE NON- SIGNIFICANCE- MITIGATED. X Issue DNS-M with 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Issue DNS-M with 15 day Period. Comment Period followed by a 14 day Appeal Period. C. Mitigation Measures 1. The applicant shall follow the recommendations of the Geotechnical Engineering Study, dated July 2, 1999, prepared by Geotech Consultants, Inc., regarding design criteria for foundations and retaining walls, excavation and shoring measures, etc. 2. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee equal to $388 per multi- family unit and $0.52 per square foot for the commercial area of the building. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 3. The applicant shall be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of $75 for each average daily trip attributed to the project. The traffic mitigation fee is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. 4. The applicant shall pay a Park's Department mitigation fee of $354.51 per multi- family dwelling unit. The Parks Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. SITERC.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Environs it Review Committee Staff Report SHERIDAN MIXED USE DEVELOPMEt LUA-99-141, SA-A,ECF REPORT OF DECEMBER 14, 1999 Page 8 of 22 Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. BUILDING Use the current UBC Code, 1997 edition. FIRE 1. The preliminary fire flow required is 6,250 GPM based on Type V, 1-hour construction with a 4-hour wall on south side. One fire hydrant is required within 150-feet of the structure and six additional hydrants are required within 300-feet of the structure. The fire flow may be reduced by going to a more restrictive type of construction. 2. Separate plans and permits are required for the installation of the fire alarm and sprinkler systems. 3. The basement parking area will need standpipes, exit stairwell enclosures and ventilation. PLAN REVIEW EXISTING CONDITIONS WATER -There are existing water mains in Burnett Ave. S. and S. 2`d St. ranging in size from 8-inch to 24-inch diameter. The proposed project is not located in an Aquifer Protection zone, but is in the downtown 196 pressure zone. There are fire hydrants in the vicinity that may be counted towards the fire protection of this site, but are subject to verification for being within 150 or 300 feet of the nearest corner of the proposed building. SEWER—There are existing 8-inch and 12-inch diameter sanitary sewer mains serving this site. STORM - A preliminary storm drainage plan per King County Surface Water Design standards has been submitted with the application. Downstream public drainage facilities exist in city streets. STREETS — Full street improvements including, but not limited to paving, sidewalks, curb and gutter, street signs and street lights exist and are required to be brought up to City of Renton standards if damaged or missing. The City of Renton will place new constructions with improvements planned for the new transit center and Burnett Avenue S. CODE REQUIREMENTS WATER 1. The System Development Charge shall be determined upon final sizing of the domestic and fire services for the building. Credit for the existing services to the building will be allowed under the redevelopment ordinance. SANITARY SEWER 1. The System Development Charge shall be determined upon final sizing of the domestic and fire services for the building. Credit for the existing services to the building will be allowed under the redevelopment ordinance. SURFACE WATER 1. The System Development Charge shall not apply as no new net impervious surface is created with this project. PLAN REVIEW - GENERAL 1. All plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. 2. A construction permit is required for each side sewer connection. Separate water permits for the domestic and fire vaults and meters are required. When plans are complete three copies of the drawings, two copies of the drainage report, a construction estimate, application and appropriate fee shall be submitted to the SITERC.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department 4dministrative Site Plan Approval&Environn it Review Committee Staff Report SHERIDAN MIXED USE DEVELOPMEh, LUA-99-141, SA-A, ECF REPORT OF DECEMBER 14, 1999 Page 9 of 22 sixth floor counter. 3. Franchise utilities construction requires separate permits by each owner utility. AIRPORT The proposed project is located beneath a heavily traveled aerial route utilized by aircraft approaching and/or departing the Renton Airport. The airport is open for use by aircraft 24-hours per day. Residents of the premises throughout the 24-hour period may hear the noise made by these aircraft. This should be considered during insulation and sound deadening design determinations. The proposed project is located within 10,000 feet of the runway, beneath the 179—foot elevation above sea level height restriction. The maximum building height is 50 feet. Therefore, the highest building elevation would be approximately 95 feet above sea level, which meets the Airport zoning horizontal surface height limit of 179 feet above sea level. POLICE 82.80 Police Calls for Service Estimated Annually(mixed use structure) CONSTRUCTION PHASE Theft from construction sites is one of the most common reported crimes in the city. To protect materials and equipment it is recommended that all materials and tools be locked up when not in use. The site will need security lighting and any construction trailer should be completely fenced in with portable chain-link fencing. The fence will provide both a physical and psychological barrier to any prospective thief and will demonstrate that this area is private property. Construction trailers should be kept locked when not in use, and should also have a heavy-duty deadbolt installed with no less than a 1-1/2" throw when bolted. Glass windows in the trailer should be shatter-resistant. I also recommend the business post the appropriate "No Trespassing" signs on the property while it's under construction (flier attached). This will aid police in making arrests on the property after hours if suspects are observed vandalizing or stealing building materials. COMPLETED BUILDING Each residential unit should have solid core doors, preferably metal or metal over solid wood with peepholes and heavy-duty dead bolt locks. The bolts need to be at least 1-1/2" in length when extended and installed with 3"wood screws. Lower unit sliding windows, including glass patio doors, will need additional locks; these locks will need to secure the panes from being pried out of the frames vertically. This means the locks will need to be placed into the top or bottom of the frames, in addition to any lock that limits horizontal movement. Alarm systems are recommended for each residential and business unit. Solid walls in any stairway or decking should be avoided; this would serve to limit the visibility and provide a place for a criminal to hide while waiting for a resident to return home. Each unit should have their individual unit numbers listed clearly with the numbers at least 6" in height of a color that contrasts with the color of the building and preferably placed under a light. In addition, there should be some directive outside the building for visitors. This will also aid police or medics who respond to a call in finding the unit that they need to go to. The underground parking will assist in protecting resident's vehicles from auto theft and theft from motor vehicle, but additional care should be taken when it comes to lighting the area. It is suggested that any Metro Parking be at street level solely. Having the underground parking for Metro passengers could invite trespassing from non-residents, but would also encourage theft from motor vehicle, which is already a burgeoning problem at area Park-n-Rides. It is recommended that the residential areas be secured with controlled entrances to dissuade trespassing of non-residents. Landscaping in and around the exterior of the property should not be too dense or high. It is important to allow visibility. Too much landscaping will give the property the look of a fortress and make the residents feel isolated, and could also possibly give a burglary sufficient coverage to break into a business or obtain access to the residential units inside. SITERC.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Environn it Review Committee Staff Report SHERIDAN MIXED USE DEVELOPME!, LUA-99-141, SA-A, ECF REPORT OF DECEMBER 14, 1999 Page 10 of 22 PART THREE: ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION - REPORT & DECISION This decision on the administrative land use action is made concurrently with the environmental determination. A. Type of Land Use Action x Site Plan Review Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Conditional Use Binding Site Plan Special Permit for Grade & Fill Administrative Code Determination B. Exhibits The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing: application, proof of posting and publication, environmental review and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No. 2: Drawing No. 1, Cover Sheet/Project InformationNicinity Map, (Received September 7, 1999) Exhibit No. 3: Drawing No. 2, Site Plan, (Received September 7, 1999). Exhibit No. 4: Drawing No. 3, G-2 Level Garage Plan - South (Received September 7, 1999). Exhibit No. 5: Drawing No. 4, G-2 Level Garage Plan - North (Received September 7, 1999). Exhibit No. 6: Drawing No. 5, G-1 Level Garage Plan - South (Received September 7, 1999). Exhibit No. 7: Drawing No. 6, G-1 Level Garage Plan - North (Received September 7, 1999). Exhibit No. 8: Drawing No. 7, R-1 Level Floor Plan - Building A (Received September 7, 1999). Exhibit No. 9: Drawing No. 8, R-1 Level Floor Plan - Building B (Received September 7, 1999). Exhibit No. 10: Drawing No. 9, R-2 Level Floor Plan - Building A (Received September 7, 1999). Exhibit No. 11: Drawing No. 10, R-2 Level Floor Plan - Building B (Received September 7, 1999). Exhibit No. 12: Drawing No. 11, R-3 Level Floor Plan - Building A (Received September 7, 1999). Exhibit No. 13: Drawing No. 12, R-3 Level Floor Plan - Building B (Received September 7, 1999). Exhibit No. 14: Drawing No. 13, Roof Plan - Building A, (Received September 7, 1999). Exhibit No. 15: Drawing No. 14, Roof Plan - Building B, (Received September 7, 1999). Exhibit No. 16: Drawing No. 15, West Elevations - Buildings A and B, (Received September 7, 1999). SITERC.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Idministrative Site Plan Approval&Environn I Review Committee Staff Report SHERIDAN MIXED USE DEVELOPMEN, LUA-99-141, SA-A, ECF REPORT OF DECEMBER 14, 1999 Page 11 of 22 Exhibit No. 17: Drawing No. 16, East Elevations — Buildings A and B, (Received September 7, 1999). Exhibit No. 18: Drawing No. 17, North Elevations — Buildings A and B, (Received September 7, 1999). Exhibit No. 19: Drawing No. 18, Building Sections A-A & B-B, (Received September 7, 1999). Exhibit No. 20: Drawing No. 19, Preliminary Utility Plan, (Received September 7, 1999). Exhibit No. 21: Drawing No. 20, R-1 Level Landscape Plan, (Received September 7, 1999). Exhibit No. 22: Drawing No. 21, R-1 Level Landscape Plan — South, (Received September 7, 1999). Exhibit No. 23: Drawing No. 22, R-1 Level Landscape Plan — North, (Received September 7, 1999). Exhibit No. 24: Drawing No. 23, Boundary & Topographic Survey, (Received September 7, 1999). C. Consistency with Site Plan Criteria In reviewing the proposal with respect to the Site Plan Approval Criteria set forth in Section 4-31-33(D) of the Site Plan Ordinance, the following issues have been identified by City Departmental Reviewers and Divisional Reviewers: 1. GENERAL CRITERIA: (1) CONFORMANCE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, ITS ELEMENTS & POLICIES The site is designated Center Downtown on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. The intent of the designation is to "create a balance of land uses which contribute to the revitalization of downtown Renton" and to "reinforce downtown Renton as the regional commercial district in the City". (Objectives DT-A and DT-B) The proposal is consistent with the following Downtown Element policies. Policy DT-1. There should be a mix of uses, including retail, office, light industrial and residential, which generate the demand for goods and services. The proposed residential, commercial and park and ride uses are appropriate to the CD designation. The residential and park and ride uses would generate a demand for goods and services. Policy DT-3. Development and redevelopment of Center Downtown should strive for urban density and intensity of uses. The net density of the proposal is 93.75 units per acre. Policy DT-5. Redevelopment of the downtown area should be encouraged to maintain and revitalize the downtown core. The proposal would revitalize the central downtown area providing a park and ride to complement the transit center. The residential component would aid in creating a 24- hour residential population in downtown. Policy DT-6. The redevelopment of downtown Renton as a multi-use Urban Center should be encouraged to create a center for the community. SITERC.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department %dministrative Site Plan Approval&Environs I Review Committee Staff Report SHERIDAN MIXED USE DEVELOPMEN, LUA-99-141,SA-A, ECF REPORT OF DECEMBER 14, 1999 Page 12 of 22 Policy DT-8. Development in the Center Downtown designation should conform to the Downtown Renton Association's Vision. The proposal is consistent with the DRA's Vision. Policy DT-15. Mixed use office and residential development may reach heights of 6-10 (medium rise) stories depending on other applicable ordinances (i.e. seismic considerations, airport flight patterns, and aquifer protection areas). The proposal is considered low-rise (1-5 stories in Downtown Element). The proposed residential density is near the maximum permitted. Policy DT-22. Maximize the use of existing urban services and civic amenities and revitalize the City's downtown by promoting medium to high density residential development in the downtown area. Allowed densities will conform to the criteria for Urban Centers in the countywide policies. Policy DT-23. Mixed use development where residential, commercial and office uses are allowed in the same building or on the same site, should be encouraged in downtown areas that are suitable for residential development. Incentives should be developed to encourage future development or redevelopment projects that incorporate residential uses. The mixed use proposal accomplishes the objectives of the above-stated policies. Policy DT-24. Net residential development densities in the downtown area should achieve a range of 25-100 dwelling units per acre. Where parcels are less than one half acre no minimum density is required. The proposal density of 93.75 dwelling units per acre meets the high-end range of the policy. Policy DT-28. Unusual attributes of the downtown - cultural opportunities, views, historic development pattern, mix of uses, proximity to the river and transportation amenities -should be used to site residential uses downtown. The proposal is well sited with respect to existing downtown amenities; particularly the proximity to the Transit Center, downtown park, Cedar River, etc. Policy DT-29. Parking should be structured whenever feasible and serve more than one use. Policy DT-30. The existing supply of parking should be better managed to encourage joint use rather than parking for each individual business. Policy DT-38. All future development and improvements in downtown should emphasize non-automobile oriented travel both to and within the downtown while maintaining an adequate amount of parking for regional retail customers. Transit and parking programs should be integrated, balanced, and implemented concurrently. The parking garage provides parking for both the residential units and a Metro park and ride. This structured parking would provide for the joint uses. The Metro park and ride would support the Renton Transit Center in encouraging opportunities for non-auto traffic in downtown. Policy DT-40. Site and building design should be pedestrian/people oriented with provisions for transit and automobiles where appropriate. Policy DT-47. Parking lots and structures should employ and maintain landscaping and other design techniques to minimize the visual impacts of these uses. SITERC.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department \dministrative Site Plan Approval&Environrr I Review Committee Staff Report SHERIDAN MIXED USE DEVELOPMEN, LUA-99-141, SA-A, ECF REPORT OF DECEMBER 14, 1999 Page 13 of 22 Staff will make recommendations regarding the façade of the parking structure along the street frontage with the review of the proposal according to the design guidelines. (2) CONFORMANCE WITH EXISTING LAND USE REGULATIONS The subject site is located in the Center Downtown (CD) zoning designation. The purpose of the CD zone is to provide a mixed-use commercial center serving a regional market as well as adjacent residences. Uses include a variety of retail sales, personal and professional services, and multi-family residential dwellings. The CD zone allows multi-family residential uses as a primary permitted use at densities ranging between 25 and 100 dwelling units per net acre. The code also specifies that multi-family residential development may be located in a mixed use building of commercial and residential uses. The proposed project includes 90 multi-family dwelling units on a 42,061 square foot site, calculating to a net density of 93.75 dwelling units per acre. Development Standards The subject site is located in the "Downtown Core Area." Projects within the Downtown Core Area are exempt from most development standards of the CD zone; including parking requirements, setbacks, lot coverage and landscape requirements. Building Height - The CD zone allows a maximum building height of 95 feet. The average height of the proposed building at the parapets is approximately 45 feet above the ground level. The maximum building height is 50 feet. The highest building elevation would be approximately 95 feet above sea level, which meets the Airport zoning horizontal surface height limit of 179 feet above sea level. Landscaping - There are no landscape street frontage requirements for buildings located in the Downtown Core Area. Street trees will be planted in front of the site as a part of the improvements for the Transit Center. The proposal includes several landscaped courtyards at the residential Level 1, above the parking garage. The courtyards would be accessible for the use of the apartment residents. The courtyards break up the mass of the residential buildings. Parking - There are no parking requirements in the Downtown Core Area. The proposal includes a parking garage that provides 90 parking stalls dedicated to the 90 residential units. This equals a ratio of 1.00 parking spaces per dwelling unit. Outside of the Downtown Core Area, the Parking Code requires 1.5 parking spaces per multi-family dwelling unit and then 1 guest parking space per 4 dwelling units which would equate to a total of 158 parking spaces. The commercial portion of the building (4,100 sq. ft.) would require approximately 17 parking spaces if it were outside the Downtown Core Area. The lower parking counts may be justified by several factors. Staff has previously evaluated parking demand for multi-family projects in the downtown core and concluded that lower parking ratios are justified based on: 1) proximity to transit facilities and 2) the large majority of units (72 out of 90) are studio or 1 bedroom units and the smaller units would have fewer occupants resulting in less cars. Many other jurisdictions have lower parking ratios for smaller apartment/condo units and also for units located in downtown cores. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) reviewed and approved of a parking ratio of 1.25 spaces per unit for a multi-family residential project on S 4th St. and S. Burnett Ave. The subject project is located directly across from the new Renton Transit Center. It may be assumed that residents of the proposed project would utilize SITERC.doc • City of Renton P/B/PW Department ldministrative Site Plan Approval&Environrr, I Review Committee Staff Report SHERIDAN MIXED USE DEVELOPMEN, LUA-99-141,SA-A,ECF REPORT OF DECEMBER 14, 1999 Page 14 of 22 transit at a proportionately higher rate. As part of an agreement with Metro, the applicant will provide transit passes to project residents. In addition, residents and guests may utilize the Metro park and ride lot during non-commute hours. Urban Center Design Overlay Regulations. All attached residential (multi-family) development and commercial/residential mixed use development in the Center Downtown (CD) zone requires design review according to the minimum standards and guidelines listed in the Urban Center Design Overlay Regulations. Staff analysis and recommended conditions are provided in a report section following site plan review. (3) MITIGATION OF IMPACTS TO SURROUNDING PROPERTIES AND USES; The subject site is located in the center of downtown Renton and is surrounded by commercial uses. The proposed uses (multi-family residential, commercial and park and ride) are not expected to adversely impact surrounding properties. In fact, the mix of uses, particularly the residential use, is clearly supported by Comprehensive Plan policies and envisioned for the revitalization of downtown Renton. Construction activities on the site would result in impacts on surrounding properties, especially due to the close proximity of adjacent buildings and uses. As presently proposed, the public alley bordering the subject property to the east would need to be closed because the excavation cut for the parking garage would extend approximately 10 feet into the alley. Several businesses utilize the alley for product deliveries, garbage pickup and access to parking. Gina Kavesh of Renton Western Wear has written a letter expressing specific concerns of losing alley access for deliveries and waste pickup. The applicant is proposing a 1:1 cut for the excavation to 1) avoid the expense of shoring the excavation cut and 2) because shoring would reduce the width of the parking garage by 2 feet. The applicant must meet minimum parking stall/aisle dimensions for the Metro park and ride garage. Reducing the width of the parking garage by 2 feet would eliminate approximately 66 parking spaces, thereby reducing the feasibility of the project. The alley would need to be closed for a 3 to 4 month duration during construction. Closure of the public alley would require approval of the City Council. Staff recommends two measures to address the construction impact of the alley closure: 1) A truck delivery/loading zone be posted along S. 3rd Street in front of American Drapery and Renton Western Wear and 2) The applicant shall be responsible for moving garbage dumpsters to S. 3rd Street for pickup once per week. Staff would recommend these measures to the City Council as conditions for approving closure of the public alley. Staff has spoken to Ms. Kavesh and these measures would satisfy her primary concerns. Staff also contacted Waste Management, the solid waste purveyor, and they prefer this to present conditions. The alley is only 10 feet wide where entering S. 3rd Street and therefore garbage trucks presently have to back out of the alley to S. 2nd Street. Construction activities would result in some noise, dust and traffic impacts on surrounding properties. These impacts would be limited to the construction phase of the project, which is estimated to be have a total duration of approximately 14 months (March 2000 to May 2001). The applicant has submitted a Construction Mitigation Plan SITERC.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department administrative Site Plan Approval&Environrr I Review Committee Staff Report SHERIDAN MIXED USE DEVELOPMEN, LUA-99-141, SA-A, ECF REPORT OF DECEMBER 14, 1999 Page 15 of 22 outlining mitigation measures to be employed for minimizing dust, noise and traffic impacts during construction. The building foundation would consist at least partially of augercast concrete piers to extend through the loose soils underlying the site. The geotechnical report recommends this type of deep foundation construction to minimize the impact of ground vibrations during the earthwork and foundation construction on adjacent buildings. The American Drapery building directly abuts the existing Good Chevrolet building and the proposed structure on the south. At this time it is not known whether the American Drapery building is supported by a deep foundation system or a conventional foundation. Surcharge loads from the adjacent structure would be considered in the shoring system and also incorporated in the design of the permanent building wall. Regardless of the measures taken to reduce ground vibrations and to limit the size of the excavation, with an excavation of this size there is always some risk of causing settlement in adjacent, conventionally supported buildings and on-grade elements. The geotechnical report recommends the measures to document conditions and to monitor construction impacts for the protection of both the applicant and adjacent property owners. The size, bulk and height of the proposed building would be greater than most existing buildings in the immediate vicinity of the site. However, the applicant is proposing building articulation/modulation and architectural details to create interest and reduce the appearance of the overall mass of the structure. The proposal is consistent with the CD zone provisions and the zoning anticipates a departure from the existing conditions and land use patterns in downtown toward a more intensive use of properties. The potential conflicts between different uses and scale of uses were evaluated with the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan and zoning for downtown. A residential population in downtown is encouraged to provide a customer base to complement existing and future commercial development. (4) MITIGATION OF IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN TO THE SITE; The subject site is covered with an existing building and no significant natural or human- made features are present on the site that would be impacted by the proposed development. The proposal would construct a building covering 98.9% of the site area. The proposal would upgrade utilities and stormwater facilities thereby mitigating impacts associated with development of the site. (5) CONSERVATION OF AREA-WIDE PROPERTY VALUES; The proposed mix-use development is expected to increase property values in the vicinity of the site. Adding residential population to downtown would improve the customer base for commercial businesses and this is also expected to increase property values. (6) SAFETY AND EFFICIENCY OF VEHICLE AND PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION; The proposal does not include a road access to the interior of the site. Auto access to the parking garage would enter off S. 2nd Street. The parking garage has two levels, a basement level and a street level. A Metro park and ride would be located at the street and basement levels and would include 150 parking stalls. The parking garage would include 90 stalls for the 90 residential units and this parking would be isolated from the Metro parking. The parking garage includes a pedestrian link to the adjacent transit SITERC.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Idministrative Site Plan Approval&Environs I Review Committee Staff Report • SHERIDAN MIXED USE DEVELOPMEN, LUA-99-141, SA-A, ECF REPORT OF DECEMBER 14, 1999 Page 16 of 22 center on Burnett Avenue S. The residential floors would be accessed from three lobbies/entries, two on Burnett Avenue S. and one on S. 2nd Street. The proposal is expected to generate 1,132.5 average daily trips. The existing auto sales/service use is estimated to generate 579 trips. Therefore, it is estimated that the proposal would result in approximately 553.5 new average daily trips on the local street system. This is not anticipated to result in a significant impact. The applicant would be required to pay the applicable traffic mitigation fee (estimated to be $41,493) for the additional trips generated by the proposal. (7) PROVISION OF ADEQUATE LIGHT AND AIR; The residential buildings comprise the upper three stories of the proposed building. The residential buildings are on top of the parking garage and the building mass is broken up by interior landscaped courtyards. This allows adequate natural light and air to reach all the residential units. The height of the proposed building is not expected to cast significant shade impacts on surrounding buildings. (8) MITIGATION OF NOISE, ODORS AND OTHER HARMFUL OR UNHEALTHY CONDITIONS; It is anticipated that the most significant noise, odor and other potentially harmful impacts would occur during the construction phase of the project. The applicant has submitted a Construction Mitigation Plan which provides measures to reduce construction impacts such as noise, control of dust, traffic controls, etc. The proposed development would not generate any harmful or unhealthy conditions. There would be noise impacts of increased traffic and activity that are normally associated with a residential population. (9) AVAILABILITY OF PUBLIC SERVICES AND FACILITIES TO ACCOMMODATE THE PROPOSED USE; AND There are adequate and available public services and facilities to accommodate the proposed development. A discussion of existing utilities and planned improvements is provided in the advisory notes section of this report. The applicant will be assessed fire, traffic and park mitigation fees to compensate for the increased demand on public services. The City will be constructing the Transit Center and related Burnett Avenue S. street and utility improvements concurrent with the planned schedule for construction of the proposal. To ensure construction coordination and minimize impacts and duplicative efforts, staff recommends a condition that all utility construction be coordinated with the City of Renton Burnett Avenue S. improvements. All services should be installed and in place, including any franchise utility installations, prior to the final lift of pavement for Burnett Avenue S. (10) PREVENTION OF NEIGHBORHOOD DETERIORATION AND BLIGHT. The proposal would redevelop and improve a site that has been in use as an auto sales/ service facility. The investment in the area and the added presence of a residential population would serve to prevent neighborhood deterioration and blight. SITERC.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department administrative Site Plan Approval&Environn I Review Committee Staff Report SHEkIDAN MIXED USE DEVELOPMEN, LUA-99-141, SA-A, ECF REPORT OF DECEMBER 14, 1999 Page 17 of 22 X Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. D. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION Having reviewed the written record in the matter, the City now enters the following: 1) Request: The applicant has requested Environmental Review and Site Plan Approval for development of the Sheridan Mixed Use Development. 2) Environmental Review: The applicant's file containing the application, State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation, the comments from various City departments, the public notices requesting citizen comment, and other pertinent documents was entered as Exhibit No. 1. 3) Site Plan Review: The applicant's site plan application complies with the requirements for information for site plan review. The applicant's site plan and other project drawings are entered as Exhibits No. 2 through 24. 4) Comprehensive Plan: The subject proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Center Downtown (CD). 5) Zoning: The site plan as presented complies with the zoning requirements and development standards of the Center Downtown (CD) Zoning designation. The subject site is located in the Downtown Core Area, which specifically exempts development from on-site parking requirements, and lot coverage, setback, and landscape requirements of the CD zone. 6) Existing Land Use: Land uses surrounding the subject site include: North: McClendons Hardware; East: Commercial, US West Communications, Law offices, Renton Western Wear., Commercial; South: American Drapery; and West: Burnett Avenue, Transit Center, Commercial. E. Conclusions 1. The subject proposal complies with the policies and codes of the City of Renton. 2. The proposal complies with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Center Downtown (CD) and the Zoning designation of Center Downtown (CD). 3. Specific Land Use (e.g. Site Plan Approval) issues were raised by various City departments. These issues are addressed in the body of this report. 4. The subject proposal requires design review according to the minimum standards and guidelines listed in the Urban Center Design Overlay Regulations. Staff analysis and recommended conditions are provided in a report section following the site plan review. SITERC.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department administrative Site Plan Approval&Environn I Review Committee Staff Report SHERIDAN MIXED USE DEVELOPMEN, LUA-99-141, SA-A, ECF REPORT OF DECEMBER 14, 1999 Page 18 of 23 F. Decision The Site Plan for the Sheridan Mixed Use Development, File No. LUA-99-141, SA-A, ECF, is approved subject to the following condition. 1. The applicant shall receive approval from the City Council for closure of the public alley to the east of the proposed site. Staff recommends that City Council approval of the alley closure include the following conditions: 1) A truck delivery/loading zone be posted along S. 3rd Street in front of American Drapery and Renton Western Wear and 2) The applicant shall be responsible for moving garbage dumpsters to S. 3rd Street for pickup once per week. These conditions would ensure that adjacent businesses are able to receive deliveries and trash pickup during the alley closure. The applicant shall obtain City Council approval for closing the alley prior to issuance of building permits. 2. All utility construction shall be coordinated with the City of Renton Burnett Avenue S. improvements. All services shall be installed and in place, including any franchise utility installations, prior to the final lift of pavement for Burnett Avenue S. EFFECTIVE DATE OF DECISION ON LAND USE ACTION: SIGNATURES: 141_2 Jana Han Zoning Administrator date SITERC.doc • City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Environn !1 Review Committee Staff Report SHERIDAN MIXED USE DEVELOPMEN i LUA-99-141, SA-A,ECF REPORT OF DECEMBER 14, 1999 Page 19 of 23 URBAN CENTER DESIGN OVERLAY REGULATIONS 1. BUILDING SITING AND DESIGN i. Pedestrian Building Entries — The minimum standard requires buildings to be oriented to the street with clear connections to the sidewalk. A primary entrance of each building shall be located on the façade facing the street. The proposal is a mixed-use project with three uses: a Metro Park and Ride, residential and commercial. The entries for each of these uses face Burnett Avenue S., the primary street fronting the project. Both Buildings 'A' and 'B' have primary entrances facing the street. The applicant's narrative describes that each of the building entries are identified with a canopy and unique, prominent architectural treatment to the building elevation at that location. The Park and Ride and residential entries are each marked with a tower and the commercial entry is emphasized with storefront glazing. The entry to the parking garage is located off S. 2nd Street away from and subordinate to the pedestrian entries facing onto Burnett Avenue S. The building elevations submitted by the applicant do not clearly indicate canopies or architectural elements that mark entries, as prescribed in the design guidelines. The applicant should submit plans showing architectural details for the entries along Burnett Avenue S. to demonstrate that entries would be clearly marked with canopies, architectural elements, ornamental lighting, or landscaping. IL Transition to Surrounding Development — Careful siting and design treatment is necessary to achieve a compatible transition where new buildings differ from surrounding development in terms of building height, bulk and scale. The following design elements shall be considered to promote a transition to surrounding uses: • Setbacks at the side or rear of a building may be increased in order to reduce the bulk and scale of larger building and so that sunlight reaches adjacent yards; • Building proportions, including step backs on upper levels; • Building articulation to divide a larger architectural element into smaller pieces; • Rooflines, pitches and shapes. The proposed development holds the street edge with no front setback similar to the existing building on the site. The current building on the site is one story and the adjacent buildings on the block are two stories. The proposed building is 4 stories, with a maximum building height of 50 feet. Although the proposed building would be taller than surrounding buildings, the immediate area is likely to change as incremental redevelopment occurs. Comprehensive Plan policies encourage taller buildings and more intensive use of properties in the downtown core. The CD zoning allows for a 95 foot height limit. The apparent bulk of the proposed building is reduced by stepping back the upper building levels and breaking up the three upper stories of the residential building into two distinct buildings over the parking garage. A 32 to 37 foot wide courtyard separates the Buildings 'A' and 'B' above the one-story garage base. Building 'A' is setback approximately 12 to 15 feet from the parking garage base along Burnett Ave. S. and 13 feet from the rear property line. Building 'B' is typically setback 4 to 6 feet from the rear property line and has only a minor 4 foot deep setback in the articulated bays along the upper street façade facing Burnett Ave. S. The street facades of both Building 'A' and 'B' are articulated along Burnett Ave. S. every 26 feet with at least a 4-foot indentation. The only exception is the entry elements which are 38 feet wide. This modulation of the street façade divides the larger street elevation into architectural sub-elements that will help to reduce the apparent bulk of the building. The proposal complies with the minimum standards of this criterion. SITERC.doc • City of Renton P/B/PW Department 4dministrative Site Plan Approval&Environn l Review Committee Staff Report SHERIDAN MIXED USE DEVELOPMEN, LUA-99-141,SA-A,ECF REPORT OF DECEMBER 14, 1999 Page 20 of 23 2. PARKING, ACCESS, CIRCULATION i. Location of Parking - No parking shall be located between a building and front property line or street side of a corner lot ii. Structure/Garage Parking— No minimum standard. Guidelines state that parking entries should not subordinate pedestrian entries and should not dominate the streetscape. Parking garages should be architecturally compatible with the residential portion of the building. The parking structure should be enclosed or screened through any combination of walls, decorative grilles, or trellis work with landscaping. Garage parking should be secure. The street side of parking garages in the CD zone should incorporate retail or service commercial facilities. There is no surface parking proposed. All parking is contained within the building. The proposed building is built to the property line or to within 3 feet of it on both Burnett Ave. S. and S. 2nd Street. The parking garage entry is located on S. 2nd Street, away from the street frontage of Burnett Ave. S. and subordinate to the primary pedestrian entries on the street. Commercial space is provided at the northwest corner of the proposed building effectively anchoring the corner of Burnett Ave. S. and S. 2nd Street. The commercial space would also screen the lower level parking garage. The street-facing façade of the garage is faced in brick veneer, an attractive material that is compatible with the residential portion of the building. There are highly visible garage portals facing Burnett Ave. S. and the applicant has indicated that the openings would be infilled with a screen pattern and window mullions that echo the residential building. Decorative treatment of the garage openings is essential along Burnett Ave. S. for compatibility with the residential portion of the building above and to maintain a pedestrian friendly streetscape. The applicant should submit a product sample of the screening for the garage openings for staff approval, prior to issuance of building permits. The vehicle entry to the parking garage is off S. 2nd Street. Most of the parking in the garage is for the Metro Park and Ride. Therefore, the garage needs to remain open to be accessible to the public. The residential parking would be separated from the Metro parking by a secured fence and gate. 3. LANDSCAPING/RECREATION/COMMON SPACE i. Minimum Standard—Attached housing developments of 10 or more dwelling units shall provide a minimum area of common space or recreation area equal to 50 square feet per unit. The common space area should be aggregated to provide usable area(s) for residents. The project consists of 90 dwelling units, which would require 4,500 square feet of common space. The proposal includes 5,200 square feet of common area. The common areas include an exercise room, a conference center, and several outdoor courtyards located at the first residential level on top of the parking garage. There are essentially two landscaped courtyards, one 3,920 sq. ft. and the other 1,150 sq. ft., in addition to a number of other smaller more linear landscaped open spaces along the perimeter of the building. All of the common areas would be open and accessible to all residents. The courtyard areas would utilize landscape planters and trellises to create a separation between private outdoor areas of the first level units and the common courtyards. The courtyards have either a western or eastern exposure. The courtyards would be located at a level above the street, away from vehicle hazards and affording privacy to residents. The proposed common areas comply with the minimum standard and guidelines of this criterion. SITERC.doc • City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Environn 11 Review Committee Staff Report • SHERIDAN MIXED USE DEVELOPMEA : LUA-99-141, SA-A,ECF REPORT OF DECEMBER 14, 1999 Page 21 of 23 4. BUILDING ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN i. Building Character and Massing - Minimum Standard — All building facades shall include modulation or articulation at intervals of no more than 40 feet. All the street-facing building facades above the first story base garage structure include modulation as well as articulation with a variety of building materials, colors, etc. The first, street level does not include extensive modulation of the building footprint, as the objective is to provide more of a hard urban edge. However, the street level facade does include some modulation and use of materials to articulate the façade and meet the criteria. At the street level, the building follows the front property line with a step back of 3 feet at several locations. A variety of finish materials as well as canopies that project over the City sidewalks are used on the street front elevations. In addition, the courtyard at the first residential level cantilevers over the public right-of-way to further break up the street elevations. The facade along Burnett Ave. S. is further broken up with garage openings with screen material. The residential levels are articulated with balconies, decks and cornices. A variety of building materials including brick, vinyl siding, and metal siding are proposed to provide visual interest. The proposal complies with the minimum standard and guidelines of this criterion. ii. Building Rooflines - Minimum Standard — Building rooflines should be varied by emphasizing dormers, chimneys, stepped roofs, gables, prominent cornice or fascia, or be broken or articulated to add visual interest to the building. Although the roofs of these two buildings are flat, they have been articulated with varying parapet and ceiling heights. The roof is broken up by clerestory dormers, which provide vaulted ceilings in the living areas of the top floor units. The building roof is further modulated with tower forms at both the main residential and Metro Park and Ride entries. The proposal complies with this criterion. Building Materials - No Minimum Standard— Guidelines state that exterior finishes should add visual interest and detail and be made of material that is durable, high quality and easily maintained. iii. The base of the building is faced with durable materials including brick veneer, stone and concrete. The upper portions of the building use "lighter" appearing materials, vinyl siding, stucco and metal siding. The proposed building materials meet the guidelines of this criterion. SITERC.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department 4dministrative Site Plan Approval&Environn 1 Review Committee Staff Report SHERIDAN MIXED USE DEVELOPMEN, LUA-99-141, SA-A, ECF REPORT OF DECEMBER 14, 1999 Page 22 of 23 Decision The Sheridan Mixed Use Development, File No. LUA-99-141, SA-A, ECF, is approved according to the minimum standards and guidelines of the Urban Center Design Overlay Regulations, subject to the following condition. 1. The applicant shall submit a product sample of the screening for the garage openings/portals for staff approval. Decorative treatment of the garage openings is essential along Burnett Ave. S. for compatibility with the residential portion of the building above and to maintain a pedestrian friendly streetscape. Development Services Division staff shall approve the screening prior to issuance of building permits. 2. The applicant shall indicated the architectural details on building plans to demonstrate that the building entries along Burnett Avenue S. are clearly marked with canopies, architectural elements, ornamental lighting, or landscaping. EFFECTIVE DATE OF DECISION ON LAND USE ACTION: SIGNATURES: 12,h624q' '----7 Jan,x"Hanson, Zoning Administrator date TRANSMITTED this 16th day of December, 1999 to the applicant and owner: Sheridan Properties P.O. Box 935 Renton, WA. 98057 Charlie Laboda Daily Homes Inc. 3316 Fuhrman Ave. E. Seattle, WA. 98104 TRANSMITTED this 16th day of December, 1999 to the following: Larry Meckling, Building Official C. Duffy, Fire Prevention Neil Watts, Public Works Division Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney South County Journal SITERC.doc • City of Renton P/B/PW Department 4dministrative Site Plan Approval&Environn t Review Committee Staff Report SH'ERIDAN MIXED USE DEVELOPMEI\,i LUA-99-141, SA-A, ECF REPORT OF DECEMBER 14, 1999 Page 23 of 23 Land Use Decision Appeal Process Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3),WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decisions must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM January 3, 2000. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. SITERC.doc I SHERIDAN - RENTON LEGAL DESCRIPTION LAND USE COMPLIANCE REFERENCE PROJECT INFORMATION:r'.,0,....LbaK. INDEX OF DRAWINGS iKEEP, LOTSI APO 2 APO LOTS, n.RAT OP PO raw CP IlMaL ACCORD*.TO i.e PLAT s�AREA .lal s rni.VaEe. !OR ADDRESS :•eleoN IeeaoeD N voLl•e M.PLATS.PARRS�».N.A•G Eo..o cLASECA,IMrA Weser v D.A.A.w ARCHITECTURAL 'A' i .EPICS.r•!EASTY R[r A LOrp S COMERCIK DDwiWN(CD/ CC, •R.,WA 506\2I S.ECL.VE CahfrnD,O ME an OP•ENNTON FOE 1. ALL,x DEED RECORDED wOEw RECORD.HEexw 057411. AuaiID MOPED USE NCLImOG ea vereoeL roso NneL.PA•eun OWNER SECTION 0 COVER SHEET PPOPOSED: COMETECIAL.IeSae.ruL.PARKING 1.9 D.,N em. .01 TM.coves S.EEr.PROJECT efM..ATIM. ..N-e1Dl Sm4n00E 5501 .4L04D. 0/11 • S r..N..N A.E.pw•.OP Pwa O5ED: •A'(SEE WILD..ELEVATORS/ Orr Xi:0.14 SECTION 1 SITE INFORMATION m -1OIDA LDi COKN.•Y. ALLOYED 'r'E' R0 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBERS PROPOSED.„s; "M"5,711.101 beG. SECTION 2 A,I SITE PLAN PLANS cIG cowry YSCSeo.S T.ND: TSeEa-m0 w A N-M1Dl K1e.10Es. •lalneED'AT G•L.oe:uDNe LEVEL GARAGE FLAN./MEL GARAGE PLAN•50,..12350-280-01 'npCpfD AT GRADE.NPR Al 4�LfKl GARAGE RAN-sW*N Q 10 CONSULTANTS: K<4...GEKAN-NoRm RECOPIED . O LEVEL ROM,RAN-COLD.*A .-Y e1D1£45000 yy SOJ S Al.RI LEVEL FLOOR PLAN.S4LD•G p 5- °' am ARCHITECT: Nw M LEKL Rose KY-MELDING. PROPOSED: M AT.LEK1 COJEITAIOS ��A LEVEL FLOOR KY-anLDep G *•a5N-NAw¢r e.D.irEcrt IU LEVEL FLOOR Kw-NLLDn4• /•� ATTACHED ED AMONG DESMN GICELNES . •EaI. Sro UNIT .bee Y) vw NCR.*SUY,purtf x K ROM -W SLDSG 0 (tea ACE EmNE14NTA PIClY.YED:Sf]a K !N x TO ISEan • 0 CC ..I CCN,AC,.YAri NARK, Nib.GCE PLAN.MOLDING 0 VICINITY MAP V 'r a.•.eEi.A.PAR.* PROPOSED STANDARD 40 �r Iww e: SECTIONS BUILDING ELEVATIONS CO-T ` ACCESSIBLE 5 TOTAL�NDwnx ee OO W er.i p .M An] EAST v.i1wp-MOLDINGS.• Q) 1 F_ .N:......,p i CIVIL: .»N�M�e„•eLev.rp-a•�LDNrp..e FF E EVI �, rArec Arm WIDE er SECTIONS BUILDING SECTIONS ,1 P S LL.+!wT�A- Nr,uf w..NE. AC euIL000 xcilo.S.-..o-> 'I TOTAL PARR Aro.x so Y MIL110. LER CML TrnAL..InLNG PROPOSED.IY INeNE. ter-pu.a.. PRELIMINARY UTILITY R. C _ tD Nemo MACES SILL eE SNARED W,I IENDENTSAL. : .Dr-lA]-.xu nI£RVIa1p sus<A¢, fxNrw.:Icon Y'9P•ee• LANDSCAPLID RI LEVEL PLANT•45 PLAN In E i .. .n•.._ cci s. I ENaIOSED:Ioall LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS:NAYIE uLl.1 RI O LEKL PLANTING PLAN-ewrN [ I l ADDRESS•1mfSyv. SIRS* SURVEY Sm1 �LEKL RANTING Kul.r•ORtN CITY I I r =DNr.c, P.nv*IP. 1 e,1 soNDAwr•TOSOGRA.•Ic pAN.E. 4 i e f UNIT AREA SUMMARIES aE: ,vp,.a.:u. {{S r--.—iw••._L:._._ ---- I RESIDENTIAL •.o .us,SN,oS \ •u\ . P_ UNIT YTFB DESCRRDON AREA SURVEYOR.0 w.Www44141 m.: E Swa GET AREA T1045 NOTES •\ •"'• .-.. - u SING sn • ww a•e,ln II I - I DIM R,b NAIL POLDERS CONSULTING A•m S..ertrlra 1 se nw el Y ED/I m .e NS RI WA R 1D,b CONTACT.wLLluf bIIKEY '� _ 1 R! SO/IPA m Lh00 NL SD.IU CI 14 '•i•i. a.lx PO 11 m m s ysi A.Ns P.M. I.xu mI.TSSsCM' NORM BOO.� I n 8011m ME Ih'r �p•b GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER _ f•.w. A it �ED fD 1Em ,„ n»Rp.b THE SITE __ 6�_ � ADDRESS Ma%�1� ` _. �\ Eel~y rrII * SOS An.Mare $I I ..•... I 1 ds...l^`_ fmDENmL1eEY N.•aE. 1 FLOOR AREA SUMMARIES PAR OM/,.,.b, : i1. `\\•�.. .'.. FLOOR DRECRH•IION AISA NOTES CITY OF RENTON N EKL _ �� �/ \�.• '• ' 6 LlVeLML AGSM I•IpE: tgsl.Nf SSSI = o NS..�. `A F N.r•^ m LEVEL ca*ewGAL WO EShM Hue. `N Ee..:r I GI LEVEL RESCENTIAL WO • 1 A LEVEL SIAp11SL pN ]4 � �jt'. • -A..••..A. IO LEKL INOpSiuL X AeY whe. GTE: 10/s/Nras SITE PLAN APPROVAL ,i+t '►ry/•,- A0.1 • SCAkm.++I °°°n OFFIG •• 60C;l' VM'UOIUOJ SOWOH 4112C 0e90 xi.rszn ej a 1188i00 MN pg. ....,0016 $ 1 • �. irerH.s,nou3, dCC - '',m 11 uo11►aZI - uMp1_►3LIS sin NO114137830 AB 1 31V0 U_ SOUTH 2ndySTFyr _ _ S 88123'28°E 300.12 ' ''• S 88'23'4N E 300.14 ;ITY OF REP f.R .Ff� ..R S.. ` • w • � K S 88123 � O 39.59 s — (¢ Il - ' s I I a en 11t4) Sr- 12 $ I H v • IIIe. I. in �d` •L', 8 23 29° E 40.1 ,N E dill . LIDA i I C' IL ' -- • 1, III A g aa. is a• ' ' I01o� R• .. W.9 u 74 .. ..� �°..� 1,. i ,._ i.._- iii i ...■ iron III a 1 \ u III! IIjIIIiI1IIIVhijF1 i1"l OilJ H!: • . ._. _. II I 9 Ili I.iIC,1` Z iis5iiiiwii:iw:niiiii:eaiti0's::-..-M....'I1k 1II111111,uam.:INL J u ri re r, m iii iii t . El 1 iiiiii (Kill it .ir -.1-11111kilkilitiR lif -: ......:,..,..,!..:_, 81 I ci< I;: : 8 o I \ .. r i ; Yi Ia A C: b I -Ail. II f M., ik.*�� 1: i7`iiii::e:: :_ a■ ;.n�.n 1 sm f • L14.. ,,..! 164 Iles \ l I k :: ►r° io? ° 111E .1.i aIi .a ,:. !iI, _ u' ? eye r~� i I!' _ 71 mlbil1_Ili 1i1 I Ilte31 + "%Him!!\ STREET =' - NM WI. a.9• ® ER ® ® ® ® S w696 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 -J 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 111 1 111 11,11111111111111111111 111111111111111111111111110111111 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 , 11111111111111111111111111111111111111 II o C (1) 0 ———————————— — W uu 1 EAST ELEVATION - BUILDING 'A' c MAL MOO 'O VMS M. ..COP.�\ .4 a.r ® ERFR FF I ® I , . ...R .9.9 z 0 ALLS IER EEI El - -..., ER BEI = =E _ 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiii11111111111 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 \_.,,,,t El:o.�u9r H I a,c 1o/e/1909• ——— I 817E PLAN — �usi APPROVAL • . • EAST ELEVATION - BUILDING_ _'A' A5.2 rrc.�•.rr 99017 • Flo �� — _ u �, —r — r,41 i, .- , + I 3 efd0 • / • I Y I iell e I I,' - I 11 ,I I Al60 1 j; I ,I; I. , • ` (III! m i — .ham `r- , • I ,11 }i V� �'L 0° t C IP r. • .._ m Ibeirirmri ��r d0vvc`v dr+w •©Cr ,>•04;0 �a©v©w • s 1 • 1/,' Rf if _ • 'C3 �o•�_ , �e... T --. • It Key Stbn.lf0 None Common None Qty. Size Scientific Nolte Common Nome ay. Size {.. "O,f�� I ii (L7 '/`yY tees: Key Rhoaoaenaro,: 4) v, Q. _I • I - 01ane.o40 .'O.tlV 51md.Min.fa. 00 M nl *fib , Q) °a I t 5a .... ....e..t.n Do.. 00 10-n m ...a...,y ovew. Ch{* 00 tir Nun �/� E • ` Ot� ,til Dor.WO . 1 ow T. T. 00 4T t t b'�O�'dm WmobM MmaM.FnoO.. CO b 3.-nt{p V/ O Dow ..411k., �\ lit, : �o� w,.e.e..n.,£1i m.a NoceV clam.u�N.ee.Rho. CO a r nu.w 2 -�f/,�. +�. u c M.._.a .�R.e 00 aT it (( ` Irk _.) Siww nano. Jmm. CO WIZ t Q'T•. byp.pnym'vent' bsY Rn.Jn. OD N-3v nt4p T FS�. I•"* � � P.un`c..a�Mb.1) own.flavor*.stet CO 6q N. '� #-•��� (�r �� d ., dmm.a 1ma. •WV.L M. �@yy'• e. Hm�.w.n Yea.Moll.. 1iulyi.mYe.Yant.es.10.s0. ro 1�o-z.•nth �'`�� '-l•1 Ac.y ma Opv�.w Moo.*900�l 1wn 00 6q AL Cam. gn. ban Oc..I tome On .LKw 0. 00 b-3."nlypr CI p�. I f> w 0 A....m.um +sane..Yap..upryl..M 00 aq.t nm.on=• Ron...mo. 00 a-15•.ta.9. Rho...an Sap.. Soa.Y....o 00 13-15".tt.r 1 IP. Shrubs: mlo on n.p.SpanO.. w.p.Sp.1as..sae 00 1e-20.le.a. G' 1 ::°0DO A.A. R...Elam oD 50-se b..e.a..e..•p...Fe on...M. CAW....n..Rho. OD 1e-3.-nose. S a Else NanOFa aan..tim R:Omeattl Co....boranlr Ban.m 00 5 ap owl eboa ......on'.a Doc. An D.i...neao. 00 W.nt{p'A II 11/�� _ pogo enwa..........4.Lon. am w�...1..r Do 5 e.owl xn.am..a..a.+.tmw Ow, ............. m"1en.-.us. e s Mb a Oamta' f3.m00A Con. 00 5 Else wnt .11o00..bm ScW..on.. S.a1.l.ma.D..00. CO,13-1Y else. , • '/./,.1�T� .� I �. J.o.an.11e sane,DNa Nam D. t N 00 s w coot 47�i b.oe.e.wan Sour.AD s1m.a.• Sow VIZ, Rl Rh. CO b-3.-.1oc. R 0 ,moo• N.1mw eta lbws Da. . ....ay seem CO 5 se omt C .1....ism'vole.Monet.. Rolm Mown...om. CO b-3.-... _li - $10nmb t b0..• _Cn. 15i5nmb 00 nu• w......0 1 Don).00 0.o Amo...b.oaa _CO,a-1e•mass -;J.seem. ' •tremme 00 53.d corn a owl 95 ..wa.o..bm"mama' in,.80.b..0. 00 b-3.•ills r. J E'�aC vie 1 Wn 1 . m*o met'0I. 03 U Q Elea moan Woo.aa a N./ Arm Row Yen v;mom CO 065a-.l..m 3 f- •C •s��pp•• w epos Drawing se L.A. pOpfip 3 am seen.A.dw 00 13.13".lYp OpO� am.Organ C.w 0h 5 gel"om. C .0..'Wean. M.a{.a.T Mle.b Area 00 13-15"nt.s. =• C.w�ma v Do..A.. oD S 9e.ml Q�0 A so xr...t• ♦��� a..1 D.My..A.as 00 13.15 10.p „ .. OOOOo • ._Jae•...Hair 00 9d cant ' A ..T1•p.Spn1a....P.M ...1.Sp...Can..Md. 00 13-IS•'m..s . Omlm eesv sa ___� 00 2 W cant 9550 Aadw Aar O. ...wood Nlab ...l 00 13-15".1He. .- S.."• mi..mr _ QfuD .,....M01.b.•e Maaaa.l6m 0.4.. CO 3.m.'.lap_ Dow..'Rom OW .a.,Son,00 CO,2 a..ant 00:120 Az.m'A.r, 0r..t.esa 01 1* 1 IC MYp o ICSUFI YM.w n... 0.21 0 Na 00 IF 00 5 SY S. oundcover b.emU.Mm ndwn p 00 W.I4pr Ham'_ 1--1 •wnam..l.o.ore u.. q.b5.13 00 1 qy N•.c •MOM N,NNoao.s.iD OCCUR l..gll•Wn ALL®S AT If'Gt D.1F. 10/04/99 SITE PLAN APPROVAL • Desk., Two Four/Two sLo F. SCALE I/5" = I' I`:112 N.......w...v.•...1.rwa.nl..some.per... 1*—sees.,.awes..e.m..1-KM NORTH 99017 Tab. n� b--=031..0_,\ or I Elri Ei FR y= m d m 7 0.= OM ,m ,ia m 171= == _._____ T g On El RR ,..EFLELLEIELEllain. == = Fl ,_,..., . ,---_,\I_ i rin ,i=tE, . ______ E/ L,,....i,_._ In•••11••••1.11. -----' f—II-1 F-1 '111=IL /mi. -- -- -- - 1 I -L—IL� _ i5 I [ 1Ell . 1❑ �1 II I I 11 _ _ H E i 1 I n,as .' CO LEAL WEST ELEVATION - BUILDING 'A' WE- al b ' aba �: r..b. O �o.rat Ta�.�\ co — —*� C I == == , , =E .c.-, _ .. ..... _ Li ...i.i_ a..n.EOM grall 1 1 1 EH on nn m Im, „,,_, _ A IEHL _.... ....... . If' III Dana uo.a.,o,i , . E9 f., *,,- ,,. --c-. -#IT; -_te a_. •!II•IIVI _i l _ = I J „�M 3gg ' i 1 , - I m c i_ ,_-_ -i I I , i•, , I' I ,S Ili . MOO `__ I/ �� I :�■■ ❑❑II=IIMI MI INN�❑❑ _ oNM MI ; E __IL — \ I— I .... i ...-, WEMEE 8rrE PUN APPROVAL • Ta.to.. WEST ELEVATION - BUILDING 'B' A5.1 . • aeon i i i I UTILITIES NOTE: �I I. ALL PROPOSED STORM WATER AND 1 SANITARY SEWER DRAINLINES, WATER i I; SERVICES, AND FIRE PROTECTION LINES SHALL BE CONNECTED TO EXISTING UTILITIES WITHIN THE CITY R/W. • LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE FURNISHED BY THE OWNER. (SITED 7/27/99 oa,,, 1.4 . N 01'30'48'E 560.05' (560.09' CITY OF RENTON) LIMITS S. BURNE'I"I' SI'. �� [WORK ,,.... ... , OF 1f7.,. w• - - O '' N I130'4_• "Y_410Q4 VI.,R L•,./ - - 1 I aE1P BE oe.�wrnKcal �� _ .. \ \\ ,�oee oanwEc r,! o H 6' /.' / PROPOSED BUfLDI!,16 _ — "- 1 CC " ' ig ;• C m I Z • I/ , C3.-% 7 I SI ,ig i 6'O i I r 7.2 nic° 41, 1 1,..,..i. i 1 i xMI 0 o I? /////// 7 ..' ' .'1.' ALLEY T w n, c. `,, Z / S V�/////////// I —3 , N D ..rn . c a ` SITE PLAN C4 SOT CI JOB NO:99-4519 L .r e srn � ra rwr — - - ammi ♦ .o urt - Mira - 11111 ° ° 111111 wr 0 D. wen Amor ME MM MN NM ==!!__ IIIII , a -- MEMO ■ • I !!U!• = C 1 1 C mux f: . NORTH ELEVATION - BUILDING 'A' C ctc wri CZ Ora ll..0 M. / //- '/ co..aa nrr �// ,^ rn 0 a,a MEE - - FT-I- - �/f _r~ o uen — ■_■■y■_ T i T{""� PPM nnr IR . r i ® __. ® ' ® JP R� _- .., fi _ + — $3 pg. iCdg'ffi r. ___ MOMS AM MVO=Mai I I WI10,6,r9. -_ -.-__ SITE PLAN APPROVAL NORTH ELEVATION - BUILDING 'B' A5.3 09017 • , 'ls Z it 1,4111 I • t 1 Mk u I i Irk �. E, `! i ( I3► III n I l-Il it _ 1 !l ii 1. e ( A 88882888888888888888 88= =88888 «'R.i, 6,. al t! *itliti l ;“ ttili U. .-yygN; F - ► 1 �� '' .9§911l9!! I <Hil -_ 1, 1,,� iUI IiI IQ IE11 ■'bip '\ N ji, rg ..,, ,, 4y:gFQ�y� �C��' ri, . 1► 11i1 R ` d r. L _ .��iO��� '1 ;9 R 8 =! a mod% tE e— I = Ili!' i it fCI 1;11p/1¢1 i1 f ausi ••ses i �- ;� A�©0CM C,\>a'_-oI!—_._e ,— 'rel,© il _,2# ..i. ;) g ,rg • �ooeo oiiI 0000 8 88888888 888888888888888888888 4 \,\`'0 Ammo 0 �a p a Us$4$3u ZswstKff +F 4�gfiy ssM; a1 FFFFFFF f_ n fiff � FFF(e(Q(F p4F FFppteFFFFFF££rr£ aGta V\I -i 99944444994419Q4 • 'i II .. • • l�© •1 MO ,� I 1 ti i P v .14--- `.1 ; 1/1 .'r/ CL7C11. F mil_p �i - - i • - 1 overt.,0004000c,; 1 B ed/o,:+oe0000ao to-, MATCH LI I . . . 0 0 0 . 0 Z ...3.�rr „,,rN erne n eye 1C I n+wH etch A e.n i- f Q i A 1116 D Y DOTE BY DESCRIPTION r— 0m Sheridan - Renton m —a A _ T4DM.,s.H:Ir.Lr , , r, � o JJ �T. •a.g y, J" j D Z 8 rBW.,.,Washington 9E005 \,'; ~ (4n)4BI-6E7e ••Fax(425)wl-Dsw Ily Homes Renton, WA .• ' -"�o CITY JF RENTON -It Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator December 16, 1999 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia,WA 98504-7703 Subject: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee(ERC)on December 14, 1999: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED • SHERIDAN MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT LUA-99-141,SA-A,ECF Proposal to demolish the existing Good Chevrolet auto service building and construct a 4-story mixed use structure with a basement. The proposed building would contain a Metro park and ride with 150 stalls, 90 multi- family residential units with 90 stalls of associated parking, and approximately 4,100 sq.ft. of commercial area. Location: 232 Burnett Avenue S., Burnett Avenue S. between 2nd and 3rd Avenue S. Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3),WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM January 3, 2000. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. If you have questions, please call me at(425)430-7219. For the Environmental Review Committee, eke), Peter Rosen Project Manager cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division Larry Fisher, Department of Fisheries David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources Don Hurter, Department of Transportation Shirley Lukhang, Seattle Public Utilities Duwamish Tribal Office Rod Malcom, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (Ordinance) Joe Jainga, Puget Sound Energy agencyltr\ 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, Washington 98055 dz. '' sirApr CITY ,..F RENTON v,, "J"' Ma N, Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator December 16, 1999 Mr. Charles Laboda Daily Homes, Inc. 3316 Fuhrman Avenue East#100 Seattle, WA 98102 SUBJECT: Sheridan Mixed Use Development Project No. LUA-99-141,SA-A,ECF Dear Mr. Laboda: This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) and is to advise you that they have completed their review of the subject project. The ERC, on December 14, 1999, issued a threshold Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with Mitigation Measures. See the enclosed Mitigation Measures document. Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM January 3, 2000. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430- 6510. The preceding information will assist you in planning for implementation of your project and enable you to exercise your appeal rights more fully, if you choose to do so. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at(425)430-7219. For the Environmental Review Committee, eA, ) ..„ Peter Rosen Project Manager cc: Daily Homes, Inc./Owners Sheridan Properties LLC Enclosure dnsmletter 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, Washington 98055 �a_ - --_...„ . . . ..__. CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES AND CONDITIONS APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-99-141,SA-A,ECF APPLICANT: DaIly Homes PROJECT NAME: Sheridan Mixed Use Development DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to demolish the existing Good Chevrolet auto service building and construct a 4-story mixed use structure with a basement. The proposed building would contain a Metro park and ride with 150 stalls, 90 multi-family residential units with 90 stalls of associated parking, and approximately 4,100 sq. ft. of commercial area. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 232 Burnett Avenue S., Burnett Avenue S. between 2nd and 3rd Avenue S. MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. The applicant shall follow the recommendations of the Geotechnical Engineering Study, dated July 2, 1999, prepared by Geotech Consultants, Inc., regarding design criteria for foundations and retaining walls, excavation and shoring measures, etc. 2. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee equal to $388 per multi- family unit and $0.52 per square foot for the commercial area of the building. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 3. The applicant shall be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of $75 for each average daily trip attributed to the project. The traffic mitigation fee is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. 4. The applicant shall pay a Park's Department mitigation fee of $354.51 per multi-family dwelling unit. The Parks Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. Sheridan Mixed Use Development LUA-99-141,SA-A,ECF Mitigation Measures & Conditions (continued) Page 2 of 2 The Site Plan for the Fourth and Burnett Apartments, File No. LUA-99-090, SA-A, ECF, is approved subject to the following condition. 1. The applicant shall receive approval from the City Council for closure of the public alley to the east of the proposed site. Staff recommends that City Council approval of the alley closure include the following conditions: 1) A truck delivery/loading zone be posted along S. 3rd Street in front of American Drapery and Renton Western Wear and 2) The applicant shall be responsible for moving garbage dumpsters to S. 3rd Street for pickup once per week. These conditions would ensure that adjacent businesses are able to receive deliveries and trash pickup during the alley closure. The applicant shall obtain City Council approval for closing the alley prior to issuance of building permits. 2. All utility construction shall be coordinated with the City of Renton Burnett Avenue S. improvements. All services shall be installed and in place, including any franchise utility installations, prior to the final lift of pavement for Burnett Avenue S. The Sheridan Mixed Use Development, File No. LUA-99-141, SA-A, ECF, is approved according to the minimum standards and guidelines of the Urban Center Design Overlay Regulations, subject to the following condition. 1. The applicant shall submit a product sample of the screening for the garage openings/portals for staff approval. Decorative treatment of the garage openings is essential along Burnett Ave. S. for compatibility with the residential portion of the building above and to maintain a pedestrian friendly streetscape. Development Services Division staff shall approve the screening prior to issuance of building permits. 2. The applicant shall indicated the architectural details on building plans to demonstrate that the building entries along Burnett Avenue S. are clearly marked with canopies, architectural elements, ornamental lighting, or landscaping. DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-99-141,SA-A,ECF APPLICANT: Daily Homes PROJECT NAME: Sheridan Mixed Use Development DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to demolish the existing Good Chevrolet auto service building and construct a 4-story mixed use structure with a basement. The proposed building would contain a Metro park and ride with 150 stalls, 90 multi-family residential units with 90 stalls of associated parking, and approximately 4,100 sq. ft. of commercial area. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 232 Burnett Avenue S., Burnett Avenue S. between 2nd and 3`d Avenue S. Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. BUILDING Use the current UBC Code, 1997 edition. FIRE 1. The preliminary fire flow required is 6,250 GPM based on Type V, 1-hour construction with a 4-hour wall on south side. One fire hydrant is required within 150-feet of the structure and six additional hydrants are required within 300-feet of the structure. The fire flow may be reduced by going to a more restrictive type of construction. 2. Separate plans and permits are required for the installation of the fire alarm and sprinkler systems. 3. The basement parking area will need standpipes, exit stairwell enclosures and ventilation. PLAN REVIEW EXISTING CONDITIONS WATER -There are existing water mains in Burnett Ave. S. and S. 2nd St. ranging in size from 8-inch to 24-inch diameter. The proposed project is not located in an Aquifer Protection zone, but is in the downtown 196 pressure zone. There are fire hydrants in the vicinity that may be counted towards the fire protection of this site, but are subject to verification for being within 150 or 300 feet of the nearest corner of the proposed building. SEWER—There are existing 8-inch and 12-inch diameter sanitary sewer mains serving this site. STORM -A preliminary storm drainage plan per King County Surface Water Design standards has been submitted with the application. Downstream public drainage facilities exist in city streets. STREETS — Full street improvements including, but not limited to paving, sidewalks, curb and gutter, street signs and street lights exist and are required to be brought up to City of Renton standards if damaged or missing. The City of Renton will place new constructions with improvements planned for the new transit center and Burnett Avenue S. • Sheridan Mixed Use Development LUA-99-141,SA-A,ECF Advisory Notes (continued) Page 2 of 3 CODE REQUIREMENTS WATER 1. The System Development Charge shall be determined upon final sizing of the domestic and fire services for the building. Credit for the existing services to the building will be allowed under the redevelopment ordinance. SANITARY SEWER 1. The System Development Charge shall be determined upon final sizing of the domestic and fire services for the building. Credit for the existing services to the building will be allowed under the redevelopment ordinance. SURFACE WATER 1. The System Development Charge shall not apply as no new net impervious surface is created with this project. PLAN REVIEW - GENERAL 1. All plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. 2. A construction permit is required for each side sewer connection. Separate water permits for the domestic and fire vaults and meters are required. When plans are complete three copies of the drawings, two copies of the drainage report, a construction estimate, application and appropriate fee shall be submitted to the sixth floor counter. 3. Franchise utilities construction requires separate permits by each owner utility. AIRPORT The proposed project is located beneath a heavily traveled aerial route utilized by aircraft approaching and/or departing the Renton Airport. The airport is open for use by aircraft 24-hours per day. Residents of the premises throughout the 24-hour period may hear the noise made by these aircraft. This should be considered during insulation and sound deadening design determinations. The proposed project is located within 10,000 feet of the runway, beneath the 179—foot elevation above sea level height restriction. The maximum building height is 50 feet. Therefore, the highest building elevation would be approximately 95 feet above sea level, which meets the Airport zoning horizontal surface height limit of 179 feet above sea level. POLICE 82.80 Police Calls for Service Estimated Annually (mixed use structure) CONSTRUCTION PHASE Theft from construction sites is one of the most common reported crimes in the city. To protect materials and equipment it is recommended that all materials and tools be locked up when not in use. The site will need security lighting and any construction trailer should be completely fenced in with portable chain-link fencing. The fence will provide both a physical and psychological barrier to any prospective thief and will demonstrate that this area is private property. Construction trailers should be kept locked when not in use, and should also have a heavy-duty deadbolt installed with no less than a 1-1/2" throw when bolted. Glass windows in the trailer should be shatter-resistant. I also recommend the business post the appropriate "No Trespassing" signs on the property while it's under construction (flier attached). This will aid police in making arrests on the property after hours if suspects are observed vandalizing or stealing building materials. Sheridan Mixed Use Development LUA-99-1 41,SA-A,ECF Advisory Notes (continued) Page 3 of 3 COMPLETED BUILDING Each residential unit should have solid core doors, preferably metal or metal over solid wood with peepholes and heavy-duty dead bolt locks. The bolts need to be at least 1-1/2" in length when extended and installed with 3"wood screws. Lower unit sliding windows, including glass patio doors, will need additional locks; these locks will need to secure the panes from being pried out of the frames vertically. This means the locks will need to be placed into the top or bottom of the frames, in addition to any lock that limits horizontal movement. Alarm systems are recommended for each residential and business unit. Solid walls in any stairway or decking should be avoided; this would serve to limit the visibility and provide a place for a criminal to hide while waiting for a resident to return home. Each unit should have their individual unit numbers listed clearly with the numbers at least 6" in height of a color that contrasts with the color of the building and preferably placed under a light. In addition, there should be some directive outside the building for visitors. This will also aid police or medics who respond to a call in finding the unit that they need to go to. The underground parking will assist in protecting resident's vehicles from auto theft and theft from motor vehicle, but additional care should be taken when it comes to lighting the area. It is suggested that any Metro Parking be at street level solely. Having the underground parking for Metro passengers could invite trespassing from non-residents, but would also encourage theft from motor vehicle, which is already a burgeoning problem at area Park-n-Rides. It is recommended that the residential areas be secured with controlled entrances to dissuade trespassing of non-residents. Landscaping in and around the exterior of the property should not be too dense or high. It is important to allow visibility. Too much landscaping will give the property the look of a fortress and make the residents feel isolated, and could also possibly give a burglary sufficient coverage to break into a business or obtain access to the residential units inside CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-99-141,SA-A,ECF APPLICANT: Daily Homes PROJECT NAME: Sheridan Mixed Use Development DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to demolish the existing Good Chevrolet auto service building and construct a 4-story mixed use structure with a basement. The proposed building would contain a Metro park and ride with 150 stalls, 90 multi-family residential units with 90 stalls of associated parking, and approximately 4,100 sq. ft. of commercial area. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 232 Burnett Avenue S., Burnett Avenue S. between 2nd and 3rd Avenue S. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM January 03, 2000. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: December 20, 1999 DATE OF DECISION: December 14, 1999 SIGNATURES: g immer an, Ad nistrator D T D partment of Plannin Building/Public Works 4t S Jim Shepherd, A ' 'stator DAT Community Services Lee Wh eler, Fire Chief DATE Renton Fire Department dnsmsignature 4 CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES AND CONDITIONS APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-99-141,SA-A,ECF APPLICANT: Daily Homes PROJECT NAME: Sheridan Mixed Use Development DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to demolish the existing Good Chevrolet auto service building and construct a 4-story mixed use structure with a basement. The proposed building would contain a Metro park and ride with 150 stalls, 90 multi-family residential units with 90 stalls of associated parking, and approximately 4,100 sq. ft. of commercial area. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 232 Burnett Avenue S., Burnett Avenue S. between 2nd and 3rd Avenue S. MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. The applicant shall follow the recommendations of the Geotechnical Engineering Study, dated July 2, 1999, prepared by Geotech Consultants, Inc., regarding design criteria for foundations and retaining walls, excavation and shoring measures, etc. 2. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee equal to $388 per multi-family unit and $0.52 per square foot for the commercial area of the building. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 3. The applicant shall be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of$75 for each average daily trip attributed to the project. The traffic mitigation fee is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. 4. The applicant shall pay a Park's Department mitigation fee of $354.51 per multi-family dwelling unit. The Parks Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. The Site Plan for the Fourth and Burnett Apartments, File No. LUA-99-090, SA-A, ECF, is approved subject to the following condition. 1. The applicant shall revise the landscape plan: 1) to provide street trees with tree grates along South 4th Street, 2)to add shrubs for additional screening of the parking garage, without creating hidden spaces posing a safety issue. The revised landscape plan shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division, prior to issuance of building permits. 2. The applicant shall revise the site plan to provide a minimum 20-foot wide alley from South 4th Street to and along the entire west side of the proposed structure. A minimum 14 foot vertical clearance will be required in the alley as clearance for fire trucks. The revisions are subject to the approval of the Development Services Division project manager and must be accomplished prior to the issuance of the building permit. All utility construction shall be coordinated with the City of Renton Burnett Avenue S. improvements. All services shall be installed and in place, including any franchise utility installations, prior to the final lift of pavement for Burnett Avenue S. DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-99-141,SA-A,ECF APPLICANT: Daily Homes PROJECT NAME: Sheridan Mixed Use Development DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to demolish the existing Good Chevrolet auto service building and construct a 4-story mixed use structure with a basement. The proposed building would contain a Metro park and ride with 150 stalls, 90 multi-family residential units with 90 stalls of associated parking, and approximately 4,100 sq.ft. of commercial area. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 232 Burnett Avenue S., Burnett Avenue S. between 2nd and 3`d Avenue S. Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. BUILDING Use the current UBC Code, 1997 edition. FIRE 1. The preliminary fire flow required is 6,250 GPM based on Type V, 1-hour construction with a 4-hour wall on south side. One fire hydrant is required within 150-feet of the structure and six additional hydrants are required within 300-feet of the structure. The fire flow may be reduced by going to a more restrictive type of construction. 2. Separate plans and permits are required for the installation of the fire alarm and sprinkler systems. 3. The basement parking area will need standpipes, exit stairwell enclosures and ventilation. PLAN REVIEW EXISTING CONDITIONS WATER -There are existing water mains in Burnett Ave. S. and S. 2nd St. ranging in size from 8-inch to 24-inch diameter. The proposed project is not located in an Aquifer Protection zone, but is in the downtown 196 pressure zone. There are fire hydrants in the vicinity that may be counted towards the fire protection of this site, but are subject to verification for being within 150 or 300 feet of the nearest corner of the proposed building. SEWER—There are existing 8-inch and 12-inch diameter sanitary sewer mains serving this site. STORM -A preliminary storm drainage plan per King County Surface Water Design standards has been submitted with the application. Downstream public drainage facilities exist in city streets. STREETS — Full street improvements including, but not limited to paving, sidewalks, curb and gutter, street signs and street lights exist and are required to be brought up to City of Renton standards if damaged or missing. The City of Renton will place new constructions with improvements planned for the new transit center and Burnett Avenue S. Sheridan Mixed Use Development LUA-99-141,SA-A,ECF Advisory Notes (continued) Page 2 of 3 CODE REQUIREMENTS WATER 1. The System Development Charge shall be determined upon final sizing of the domestic and fire services for the building. Credit for the existing services to the building will be allowed under the redevelopment ordinance. SANITARY SEWER 1. The System Development Charge shall be determined upon final sizing of the domestic and fire services for the building. Credit for the existing services to the building will be allowed under the redevelopment ordinance. SURFACE WATER 1. The System Development Charge shall not apply as no new net impervious surface is created with this project. PLAN REVIEW -GENERAL 1. All plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. 2. A construction permit is required for each side sewer connection. Separate water permits for the domestic and fire vaults and meters are required. When plans are complete three copies of the drawings, two copies of the drainage report, a construction estimate, application and appropriate fee shall be submitted to the sixth floor counter. 3. Franchise utilities construction requires separate permits by each owner utility. AIRPORT The proposed project is located beneath a heavily traveled aerial route utilized by aircraft approaching and/or departing the Renton Airport. The airport is open for use by aircraft 24-hours per day. Residents of the premises throughout the 24-hour period may hear the noise made by these aircraft. This should be considered during insulation and sound deadening design determinations. The proposed project is located within 10,000 feet of the runway, beneath the 179—foot elevation above sea level height restriction. The maximum building height is 50 feet. Therefore, the highest building elevation would be approximately 95 feet above sea level, which meets the Airport zoning horizontal surface height limit of 179 feet above sea level. POLICE 82.80 Police Calls for Service Estimated Annually(mixed use structure) CONSTRUCTION PHASE Theft from construction sites is one of the most common reported crimes in the city. To protect materials and equipment it is recommended that all materials and tools be locked up when not in use. The site will need security lighting and any construction trailer should be completely fenced in with portable chain-link fencing. The fence will provide both a physical and psychological barrier to any prospective thief and will demonstrate that this area is private property. Construction trailers should be kept locked when not in use, and should also have a heavy-duty deadbolt installed with no less than a 1-1/2" throw when bolted. Glass windows in the trailer should be shatter-resistant. I also recommend the business post the appropriate "No Trespassing" signs on the property while it's under construction (flier attached). This will aid police in making arrests on the property after hours if suspects are observed vandalizing or stealing building materials. Sheridan Mixed Use Development LUA-99-141,SA-A,ECF Advisory Notes (continued) Page 3 of 3 COMPLETED BUILDING Each residential unit should have solid core doors, preferably metal or metal over solid wood with peepholes and heavy-duty dead bolt locks. The bolts need to be at least 1-1/2" in length when extended and installed with 3"wood screws. Lower unit sliding windows, including glass patio doors, will need additional locks; these locks will need to secure the panes from being pried out of the frames vertically. This means the locks will need to be placed into the top or bottom of the frames, in addition to any lock that limits horizontal movement. Alarm systems are recommended for each residential and business unit. Solid walls in any stairway or decking should be avoided; this would serve to limit the visibility and provide a place for a criminal to hide while waiting for a resident to return home. Each unit should have their individual unit numbers listed clearly with the numbers at least 6" in height of a color that contrasts with the color of the building and preferably placed under a light. In addition, there should be some directive outside the building for visitors. This will also aid police or medics who respond to a call in finding the unit that they need to go to. The underground parking will assist in protecting resident's vehicles from auto theft and theft from motor vehicle, but additional care should be taken when it comes to lighting the area. It is suggested that any Metro Parking be at street level solely. Having the underground parking for Metro passengers could invite trespassing from non-residents, but would also encourage theft from motor vehicle, which is already a burgeoning problem at area Park-n-Rides. It is recommended that the residential areas be secured with controlled entrances to dissuade trespassing of non-residents. Landscaping in and around the exterior of the property should not be too dense or high. It is important to allow visibility. Too much landscaping will give the property the look of a fortress and make the residents feel isolated, and could also possibly give a burglary sufficient coverage to break into a business or obtain access to the residential units inside CITY OF RENTON Planning / Building / Public Works MEMORANDUM DATE: December 9, 1999 TO: File FROM: Peter Rosen SUBJECT: Sheridan Mixed Use Development—LUA99-141, SA-A, ECF I have spoken to Dan Bridges and Steve Aiton of Waste Management(phone#206-243-4050 ext. 860) regarding the issue of garbage pickup for Renton Western Wear and American Drapery during alley closure for the Daily project. Waste Management is presently unable to drive their trucks through the narrow(10-foot wide)alley outlet onto S 3ra Street. They drive in from the alley off S 4th Street and then back out. Garbage and recycling pickup is once per week on Tuesdays, early morning. They suggested that a satisfactory solution would be if someone wheeled the dumpsters to the curb on Monday evening for Tuesday pickup. Steve said they could provide locked containers for the patrons. Charlie Laboda of Daily Homes said his workers could be responsible for moving the dumpsters to the street. I plan on recommending this as a condition for City Council approval of the alley closure. AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Charlotte Ann Kassens first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of the SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL 600 S. Washington Avenue, Kent, Washington 98032 a daily newspaper published seven (7) times a week. Said newspaper is a legal NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION newspaper of general publication and is now and has been for more than six months ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE prior to the date of publication, referred to, printed and published in the English language RENTON,WASHINGTON continually as a daily newspaper in Kent, King County, Washington. The South County The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non- Journal has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the Significance - Mitigated for the following State of Washington for King County. project under the authority of the Renton The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the South County Municipal Code. Journal (and not in supplemental form) which was regularly distributed to the subscribers SHERIDAN MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a PU ,SA-A,ECF Proposal 41 to demolish existing Good Chevrolet auto service building and con- Sheridan Mixed Use Development struct a 4-story mixed use structure with a basement. Location: 232 Burnett Ave.So. as published on: 12/20/99 Apals of e t enronmnl e - minationpe iRCWeith 43.r 21.0075(3), WACta 197- 11-680] and/or the land usevi decisione must The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of$46.00, d in writing on or before 5:00 PM Janbeuary 3, 2000. If no appeals are filedd by this date, both actions will become final.ter Appealsfile charged to Acct. No. 8051067. . must be filedhe in writing together Legal Number 6995 a with:with Hearing therequired Examiner$75.00, Citypplication of Rentfee on. '�� 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA Legal ou my JOurnal 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are gov erned by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional informatior regarding the appeal process may be Subscribed and sworn before me on this, - day of , 19 ,`-1 obtained from the Renton City Clerk'; Office,(425)-430-6510. Published in the South County Journa December 20, 1999,6995 �`�oO�,�• e r••�1 fps p�,�9 // .c I//.t/ J/l/I�t�\ �1 0.(,// (/L/f./Lj� No t�` Notary Public of the State of Washington (/ 4: residing in Renton ,' - King County, Washington '1111FO•2 6.... ....? ,�`, �: F l'JASy‘ ��i,a NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. SHERIDAN MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT LUA-99-141,SA-A,ECF Proposal to demolish existing Good Chevrolet auto service building and construct a 4- story mixed use structure with a basement. Location: 232 Burnett Ave. So. Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM January 3, 2000. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430- 6510. Publication Date: December 20, 1999 Account No. 51067 dnsmpub.dot INO-1110E ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: SHERIDAN MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-99.141SA-A,ECF Proposal to demolish the existing Good Chevrolet auto service building and construct a 4-story mixed use structure with a basement.The proposed building would contain a Metro park and ride with 150 stalls,90 multi-lamily residential units with 90 stalls o1 associated parking,and approximately 4,100 sq.ft.of commercial area.Location:232 Burnett Avenue S.,Burnett Avenue S.between 2 and r Avenue S. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE(ERG)HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of either the environmental determination[RCW 43.21.0075(3),WAC 197-11-6801 and/or the land use decision must be filed In writing on or before 5:00 PM January 3,2000.If no appeals are filed by this date,both actions will become final.Appeals must be filed In writing together with the required 575.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner,City of Renton,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055.Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11B.Additional Information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office,(425)-430-6510. ?. .• .y ` iN �! I Omd- im 3r 00 2..-J • 2I Al frt1 . 5�a '�F-j`� 1nns� �k • . p, • Pi avail I �AP L7 G F� _ ErS nail amm]m AV m!E v Pillti.aPJfas-J�iml lo.Lm� p'r�_z� ;P'� lardaJL - ei,-.. 4••ems ._Sla p am9 ilea aaggp r •o ��� I p ma camas maims-1 • V amaa 6GITA1 Soles •v rd a41� amp Wit ERI ere fie alali0 le. =! sup 9aaceaOetram 1;aO BNS' • d' sows are.= mg ra 1r. nisziSIM I rorT.t jl.rc rasa ra DZ41:-.:11.5f r"" .p IBG•eN t a ra °`Sx9° a. "pr" ,[ arm. aw J f is-arA flea rt abate i1:ak me alA 1 lZJ CI.Kd _ arr:�. esZ 0� alas !: ( r-ins G,.:°� =MC.yy6 1ia . ( NM OGi�nr .II'�r,I it m �^ aSJ'IILO �Jtttra � . znn 1 ate- �r� asm FOR FURTHER INFORMATION.PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON,DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT(425)430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please Include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. CERTIFICATION I, ,'e1GA ('-4FtJp Cl.i , hereby certify that copies of the above document were posted by me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on 'p.Ex,.ervt.p3arc_ 1 w , 1`i 9 `i • Signed: ,...6� ATTEST: Subcribed and sworn before me, a Nortary Public, 71 oar the State of Washington residing in t,2-, e, - , on the IN A day of 4 Y MARILYN KAMCHEFF NOTARY PUBLIC /9'") a`u-( cA� STATE OF WASHINGTON COMMISSION EXPIRES JUNE 29,2003 . MARILYN KAMCHEFF !YY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES:6-29-Os V 1\ra , ..�UlI DEVELOPMENT PLANNING I CITY OF RENTON NOV 2 9 1999 DALLY HOMES RECEIVED INCORPOR ATED ■ November 24, 1999 "Exceptional Quality Timeless Value Peter Rosen Project Manager City of Renton Planning Dept. 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Via FAX(425) 430-7300 RE: Sheridan Mixed Use Development Project No. LUA-99-141,Sa-A,ECF Dear Peter, This letter is written per your request to address the option of shoring at the alley. As you are aware, tilt:proposed project is a 90 unit apartment over a two level parking garage. The garage is over sized to accommodate a Metro park and ride. This will be the first project of it's kind inccrporating an urban park and ride in a parking structure. In order to make this work for Metro; they have given us minimum lane widths, minimum parking stall size and minimum number of stalls to be designated as Metro stalls. The project as designed meets the minimums as directed by Metro. By shoring the alley, the side to side width of the parking garage will be reduced up to two feet. This will eliminate approximately 66 parking spaces. (stalls 12-44 level one, and stalls 60-81, and 138-148 level 2) These spaces could be replaced by parallel spaces but as stated above, the current design is at the Metro minimum for number and size of spaces. Reducing the size of the parking garage would kill the project both from an apartment and Metro perspective. Please contact me if you need any further information. �i rely, yHom sInc .r, arlie Labo Vice President 3316 FUHRMAN AVE.E. • SUITE 100 • SEATTLE,WA 98102 • (206)328-3770 • FAX(206)328-6909 • #DALLYHI120L7 to recycled paper VELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS LAND USE PERMIT SUBMITTAL WAIVED MODIFIED COMMENTS: REQUIREMENTS: - BY BY: Calculations, Survey, Drainage Control Plan 2 Drainage Report 2 4,3 YLQ,: Elevations, Architectural 3 AND 4 Elevations, Grading 2 tiv'' d&c ' g .t�ttl Existing Covenants (Recorded Copy)4 Existing Easements (Recorded Copy) 4 Flood Plain Map, if applicable 4 Floor Plans 3AND4 Geotechnical Report 2AND3 �,3/ Grading Plan, Conceptual 2 21) Grading Plan, Detailed z ,`� # King County Assessor's Map Indicating Site 4 Landscaping Plan, Conceptual., Legal Description 4 List of Surrounding Property Ow.ners4 Mailing Labels for Property Owners 4 Map of Existing Site Conditions Master Application Form 4 Monument Cards (one per monument) , Parking, Lot Coverage & Landscaping Analysis 4 Plan Reductions (PMTs) 4 Postage 4 Public Works Approval Letter2 \tr'_ ` Title Report or Plat Certificate 4 Topography Map (5' contours)3 Traffic Study 2 AL77 Tree Cutting/Vegetation Clearing Plan 4 Utilities Plan, Generalized 2 ' �EFu vJ I ?,c xA •,' .,w,c� k-t7c►ktt01,> Wetlands Delineation Map 4 Wetlands Planting Plan 4 Wetlands Study 4 x0,t4 This requirement may be waived by: O� C\N O 10jg�J 1. Property Services Section � PROJ QNAME: ` kC-l2i(UNV.) 'NM- USt; 2. Public Works Plan Review Section 3. Building Section GCj° DATE: G 117 it/ 4. Development Planning Section h:\division.s\develop.ser\dev.plan.ing\waiver.xls 4 CITY OF RENTON Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Planning Jesse Tanner,Mayor Susan Carlson,Administrator October 26, 1999 Gina Kavesh, Treasurer Renton Western Wear 724 S. 3rd Street Renton, WA 98055 Dear Gina: I received your letter dated October 7, 1999 and I disagree with your premise that decisions and agreements were reached at the September 30th meeting. The purpose of the meeting on September 30th was to give you preliminary information about the possible redevelopment of Howard Sheridan's property and to discuss your issues and concerns, not to negotiate formal agreements. I felt that the meeting was productive and that you clearly articulated your concerns about blockage of the alley during construction and how that would affect both Renton Western Wear and American Drapery. This is a legitimate concern and the City will work with you and Dally Homes to mitigate the potential impacts. However, this project is still speculative. A final decision on whether to purchase the property and build the project will not be made by Dally Homes until sometime in mid-November. Once that decision is made, it will be appropriate to work out a formal agreement between Dally Homes and the adjacent property owners on how the construction impacts will be mitigated. The items mentioned in your letter are good place to begin the discussion,but there might be additional things that can be done and better solutions once all of the facts are known. I will contact you and representatives of American Drapery to set up a meeting once a final decision is made to move forward with this project. Sincerely, Susan Carlson EDNSP Administrator Cc: Mayor Tanner Jay Covington Don Daily Peter Rosen 1055 South Grady Way= Renton,Washington 98055 *nt0n , .- o "Quality at Reasonable Prices" 724 South 3rd Street Renton, Washington 98055 (206) 255-3922 DEVELOPMENT PLANK INC" CITY OF RENTON Mr. Peter Rosen, Project Manager OCT 1999 Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way RECEIVED Renton, WA 98055 October 26, i 999 \T Re: Land U e % LUA-99-141, SA-A, ECF Application name- Sheridan Mixed Use Development Dear Mr. Rosen: I am concerned about the above referenced project impacting the daily, ongoing, retail business of Renton Western Wear, Inc. unless the building permit conditions are explicit to keeping the adjacent alley open to delivery truck traffic. I have attached the letter I sent to Ms. Sue Carlson, Economic Development Director of the City of Renton, and request that it he included as part of my lbrmai comments for this application. The letter details my concerns and possible mitigation actions that should be addressed and/or required prior to approval oof the application. It should be noted that although I thought I had agreement with Mr. Don Daily on many of the paragraphs within the letter, Mr. Daily has written to advise me that the meeting was informational only and his comments were to only discuss potential ways our concerns could be mitigated. I appreciate Mr. Daily's legally appropriate response that he did not make any agreements, decisions or promises to Renton Western Wear, Inc. during our meeting. However, I also believe our requests and discussions as reported in our letter are c.�_ formal � a .• a iewsoihable and should made part of the Cu%r'.i approval conditions and mitigation actions. I would be pleased to meet with you and Mr. Daily to further discuss the issues in detail and attempt to find mutually satisfactory solutions that can be formally implemented by the permitting process or by legal Agreements of Understanding between the involved parties. My letter also reports several agr;,cmcnts made by Ms. Sue Carlson on behalf of the City of Renton. 1 hereby request that your office also be involved with implementation of • those agreements to assure that the City behaves as tt single agency protecting the rights of all contiguous property owners and users of the alley. Sincerely, Gina K.avesh Treasurer Cc: Sue Carlson • Don Daily *nt011 . :-•, t w. 471? :- • r®® "Quality at Reasonable Prices" 724 South 3rd Street Renton, Washington 98055 (206) 255-3922 Sue Carlson Economic Development Director City Of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton,WA 98055 Dear Sue, This is to confirm the agreements and decisions that were reached during the meeting between Renton Western Wear,Inc,Daily Homes, Inc.American Drapery Inc.and you during our meeting of September 30th 1999. Daily Homes anticipates construction on the Good Chevrolet location to begin approximately March 2000. This construction will take place in the public alley behind Renton Western Wear, Inc.and American Drapery and is expected to last 12 to 16 weeks.At completion of this foundation work the alley will be re- paved back to it's original width.The final building will not infringe into the overall alley's width. As discussed this alleyway is a vital delivery route for both business and can not be blocked or obstructed for any length of time without serious financial ramifications for both businesses.(Statement about easement goes here)Both businesses(American Drapery and Renton Western Wear,Inc.will take any necessary action to ensure that their businesses are not adversely affected by this construction process. In order alleviate undue hardship on our business and the construction process Don Daily of Daily Homes Inc.and you agreed to following items: Renton Western Wear, Inc.and American Drapery would be kept informed of construction and demolition schedules. The trench necessary to dig for the foundation of the new building would run the length of the • alley to the property line of American Drapery. • The width of this trench will be somewhere between 4 to 9 feet wide. Width to be determined based on soil samples. Daily Homes Inc.will inform Renton Western Wear,Inc and American Drapery of the width of this trench prior to construction. This trench will be fenced or somehow blocked such that large delivery vehicles or individuals can not drop into the trench. In order to allow delivery traffic to have alley access parking within the alley will be prohibited. The City will contact US West and negotiate an alternative parking solution for their vans and trucks. The City would correspond with US West regarding the limited access to the alley during this 12 to 16 week time frame. The City will contact the Attorneys at Houser,Dobson&Houser and negotiate a parking alternative for their office. • The City will provide 4 all day parking spots for Renton Western Wear Inc. corporate officers since their current alley parking set aside will be blocked both by the construction and the route delivery trucks will be forced to take through the alley. Daily Homes Inc.will work with Truck drivers that they are associated with to ensure that the width left over in the alley will be wide enough to back an 18 wheeler truck down. The City or Daily Homes will contact Waste Management Rainier and determine accessibility for garbage&recycle pickups. Daily Homes will pay any'push out' fees charged by Waste Management for pickup of Renton Western Wear, Inc. dumpsters.Accessibility for garbage and recycle pickup will be maintained throughout the duration of this project. We did not discuss alley access once the foundation work has been completed and other work has begun. If necessary we will then need to revisit these accessibility issues if Daily Homes requires any long-term access that could impede access. We certainly appreciate the investment Mr. Daily and the City has made in Downtown and hope that we all benefit from these exciting changes. Sincerely, Gina Kavesh Treasurer AL ,/ DALLY HOMES I N C O R P O R A TED ■ "Excepusnal Quality-Timeless Value" October 19, 1999 Gina Kavesh,Treasurer Renton Western Wear 724 S. 3rd Street Renton,WA 98055 RE: CONSTRUCTION IN ALLEY Dear Gina: I am in receipt of the copy of your letter dated October 7, 1999 to Sue Carlson. Please be advised, it was my understanding that our meeting of September 30, 1999 was to give you early speculative information concerning the potential development of Howard Sheridan's property and its effect on the alley. At no time during that meeting did Dally Homes make any agreements, decisions or promises to Renton Western Wear. At the meeting we discussed issues of transportation through the alley during construction that may effect the contiguous properties to the alley and'potential ways they could be mitigated. As I stated in the meeting once we know that there will be construction on the Sheridan property and when construction plans are completed, we can discuss the issues in detail and attempt to find solutions. Sincerely, DALLY HOMES, INC. Donald F. Dally President cc Sue.Carlson, Irr".•._ .is,� ja. ... w .)�..�...._ �.., -.;•'.TJri ..�,. *wr 1.'�.' - 3316 FUHRMAN AVE.E. • SUITE 100 • SEATTLE,WA 98102 • (206)328-3770 • FAX(206)328-6909 • #DALLYHI120L7 t4) recycled paper Renton • . • `r. :- ( :-• • o "Quality at Reasonable Prices" 724 South 3rd Street Renton, Washington 98055 (206) 255-3922 "'PLANN1N L - OF RENTOAM Mr. Peter Rosen, Project Manager OCT 4 " 1999 Development Services Division RECEIVED 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 October 26, 1999 Re: Land Use # LUA-99-141- SA-A. ECF Application name- Sheridan Mixed Use Development Dear Mr. Rosen: am concerned about the above referenced project impacting the daily, ongoing, retail business of Renton Western Wear, Inc. unless the building permit conditions are explicit to keeping the adjacent alley open to delivery truck traffic. I have attached the letter I sent to Ms. Sue Carlson, Economic Development Director of the City of Renton, and request that it be included as part of my formal comments for this application. The letter details my concerns and possible mitigation actions that should be addressed and/or required prior to approval of the application. It should be noted that although I thought I had agreement with Mr. Don Daily on many of the paragraphs within the letter, Mr. Daily has written to advise me that the meeting was informational only and his comments were to only discuss potential ways our concerns could be mitigated. I appreciate Mr. Daily's legally appropriate response that he did not make any agreements, decisions or promises to Renton Western Wear, Inc. during our meeting. However, I also believe ou'requests and discussions as reported in our letter are rer.srliAlc arvi :hould ';_ ;v.,,1p i-,,:rt nff.he form& approval conditions and mitigation actions. I would be pleased to meet with you and Mr. Daily to further discuss the issues in detail and attempt to find mutually satisfactory solutions that can be formally implemented by the permitting process or by legal Agreements of Understanding between the involved parties. My letter also reports several agreements made by Ms. Sue Carlson on behalf of the City of Renton. I hereby request that your office also be involved with implementation of those agreements to assure that the City behaves as a single agency protecting the rights of all contiguous property owners and users of the alley. Sincerely, Gina Kavesh Treasurer Cc: Sue Carlson Don Dally `rRenton . I , V , f". ' © "Quality at Reasonable Prices" 724 South 3rd Street Renton, Washington 98055 (206) 255-3922 Sue Carlson-Economic Development Director City Of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 October 7, 1999 Dear Sue, This is to confirm the agreements and decisions that were reached during the meeting between Renton Western Wear, Inc, Daily Homes, Inc.American Drapery Inc.and you during our meeting of September 30, 1999. Daily Homes anticipates construction on the Good Chevrolet location to begin approximately March 2000. The foundation construction will take place in the public alley behind Renton Western Wear, Inc. and American Drapery and the foundation construction is expected to last 12 to 16 weeks. At completion of this foundation work the alley will be re-paved back to it's original width. The final building will not infringe into the overall alley's width. As discussed,this alleyway is a vital delivery route for both Renton Western Wear, Inc.and American Drapery and can not be blocked nor obstructed for any length of time without serious financial ramifications for both businesses. American Drapery and Renton Western Wear, Inc.are prepared to take any and all necessary actions to ensure that this construction process does not adversely affect their businesses. In order alleviate undue hardship on our business arid the construction process Don Daily of Daily Homes Inc. and you, representing the City of Renton,agreed to following items: Renton Western Wear, Inc. and American Drapery would be kept informed of construction and demolition schedules. The trench,necessary to pour the foundation of the new building, which would run the length of the alley to the property line of American Drapery would be constructed so as not to impede passage of large delivery trucks. The City agreed to be responsible for negotiating with U.S. West and the Attorneys at Dobson, Houser& Davidson to prohibit parking on their adjacent alley property during this 12 to 16 week construction period to enable passage of delivery trucks. The City also agreed to negotiate and arrange alternative parking solutions for U.S. West, Dobson, Houser&Davidson and Renton Western Wear, Inc. to replace the parking eliminated for the 12 to 16 week period. (The City will provide four all day parking spots for Renton Western Wear, Inc. corporate officers since their current alley parking will be blocked by the construction and the route delivery trucks will be forced to take through the alley.) Don Daily advised that he expected the trench width to be somewhere between 4 to 9 feet wide,depending upon soil samples,and that the remaining alley access, including protective safety fencing for the trench would be sufficient for 18 wheel delivery trucks to safely deliver down the alley. Dally Homes Inc.agreed to inform Renton Western Wear, Inc and American Drapery of the width of the trench prior to construction. My subsequent review of the alley indicated that the U.S. West building has a concrete,two foot wide,protrusion within their parking area that effectively reduces the alley width and must be considered when evaluating truck passage clearances. it is possible,depending on soil conditions, that to provide truck clearance the trench will require structural retaining to protect against cave-in or soil slumping caused by heavy vehicle forces or natural water conditions. it also came to my attention that U.S. West has significant underground cabling within the alley that needs to be considered during excavation, The City or Daily Homes will contact Rainier Waste Management and determine accessibility for garbage&recycle pickups. Daily Homes agreed to pay any'push out' fees charged by Waste Management for pickup of Renton Western Wear, Inc.and American Drapery dumpsters. Daily responsibility for garbage and recycle pickup accessibility will be maintained throughout the total duration of this project. Dully Homes is aware that if alley access meds to be restricted during construction,they are responsible for scheduling that work on Saturday,Sunday and Holidays so as not to interfere with normal weekday truck deliveries to Renton Western Wear, Inc.and American Drapery. Sue Carlson accepted responsibility to coordinate with all responsible City Offices to assure that building permits,project approval documents and vehicle safety issues are all compatible and enforce the understandings and agreements noted above.The City will investigate and establish the minimum safe clearances required for 18 wheel trucks within the alley during the trenching period and thereby establish the associated maximum permissible trench width and shoring requirements to be included within the building permits. The City permitting will also specify the re-paving requirements, including fill, surface,drainage and schedule,to return the alley to full access,immediately after completion of the foundation construction phase. We did not discuss alley access once the foundation work has been completed and other work has begun. if necessary, we will then need to revisit these accessibility issues if Daily Homes requires any temporary restrictions that could impede our access. We certainly appreciate the investment Mr. Daily and the City has made in Downtown Renton and hope that we all benefit from these exciting changes. Please advise receipt of this letter and concurrence of the above agreements and actions. Sincerely, • Gina Kavesh Treasurer Cc: Don Daily (Daily Homes, inc.) Dick Wilson(American Drapery) Paul(Bud)Houser Jr.(Dobson, Houser,&Davidson) US West • • A r"AbIq411 r 11111 1111 111111.1...1 sus DALLY HOMES INCORPOR ATFD ■ "Exceptional Quality'-7imelea.v Value" October 19, 1999 Gina Kavesh, Treasurer Renton Western Wear 724 S. 3rd Street Renton, WA 98055 RE: CONSTRUCTION IN ALLEY Dear Gina: I am in receipt of the copy of your letter dated October 7, 1999 to Sue Carlson. Please be advised, it was my understanding that our meeting of September 30, 1999 was to give you early speculative information concerning the potential development of Howard Sheridan's property and its effect on the alley. At no time during that meeting did Dally Homes make any agreements, decisions or promises to Renton Western Wear. At the meeting we discussed issues of transportation through the alley during construction that may effect the contiguous properties to the alley and potential ways they could be mitigated. As I stated in the meeting once we know that there will be construction on the Sheridan property and when construction plans are completed, we can discuss the issues in detail and attempt to find solutions. Sincerely, DALLY HOMES, INC. Donald F. Dally President cc: Sue.Carlson .• .�.'•yam $o.E is f LiGL�CA% 41e•i' `:. 2 t i 't.. .. 3316 FUHRMAN AVE.E. • SUITE 100 • SEATTLE,WA 98102 • (206)328-3770 • FAX(206)328-6909 • #DALLYHI120L7 ® recycled paper Washington State Northwest Region ., Department of Transportation 15700 Dayton Avenue North Sid Morrison P.O. Box 330310 Secretary of Transportation Seattle,WA 98133-9710 (206)440-4000 October 28, 1999 ac2F� Peter Rosen cc City of Renton Of) . �'�if' f Development Services Division 1055 S Grady Way Ck• ' 1999 ' v Renton, WA 98055-3232 t/F Co RE: SR 900, MP 10.97, CS 1712 LUA-99-141, SA-A, ECF, Sheridan Mixed Use Development Dear Mr. Rosen: Thank you for giving us the opportunity to review the Notice of Application for the Sheridan Mixed Use Development,which is located at 232 Burnett Avenue S in Renton. We have reviewed the subject document and have no comments. The project will not have significant impact on the state highway system. If you have any questions,please call John Collins at (206) 440-4915. Sincerely, raig J. Stone, P.E. Area Administrator- South King CJS:jc JTC cc: file City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMEN fi��L & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIE SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: r`c c.c� COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 5, 1 ' •9 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-14 A-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 22, 1•.• APPLICANT: Daily Homes PROJECT MANAGER: Peter '.• PROJECT TITLE: Sheridan Mixed Use V. - .•ment WORK ORDER NO: LOCATION: 232 Burnett Ave. So., between 2nd&3r. SITE AREA: 42,061 sq.ft. I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to demolish the existing Good Chevrolet auto service building and construct a 4- story mixed use structure with a basement. The proposed building would contain a Metro park and ride with 150 stalls, 90 multi-family residential units with 90 stalls of associated parking, and approximately 4,100 sq. ft. of commercial area. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet (FS annual// Q ale ed Cllminen — B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where addition I information is needed to properly assess this proposal. e Signature of Director or Autho Representative Date routing Rev.10/93 PROJECT LUA-99-141, SA-A, ECF 232 Burnett Avenue South City of Renton Department of Planning/ Building/ Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET (Continuation) POLICE RELATED COMMENTS 82.80 Police Calls for Service Estimated Annually(mixed use structure) CONSTRUCTION PHASE Theft from construction sites is one of the most common reported crimes in the city. To protect materials and equipment it is recommended that all materials and tools be locked up when not in use. The site will need security lighting and any construction trailer should be completely fenced in with portable chain-link fencing. The fence will provide both a physical and psychological barrier to any prospective thief and will demonstrate that this area is private property. Construction trailers should be kept locked when not in use, and should also have a heavy-duty deadbolt installed with no less then a 1-1/2" throw when bolted. Glass windows in the trailer should be shatter-resistant. I also recommend the business post the appropriate"No Trespassing" signs on the property while it's under construction(flier attached). This will aid police in making arrests on the property after hours if suspects are observed vandalizing or stealing building materials. COMPLETED BUILDING Each residential unit should have solid core doors, preferably metal or metal over solid wood with peepholes and heavy-duty dead bolt locks. The bolts need to be at least 1-1/2" in length when extended and installed with 3"wood screws. Lower unit sliding windows, including glass patio doors, will need additional locks; these locks will need to secure the panes from being pried out of the frames vertically. This means the locks will need to be placed into the top or bottom of the frames, in addition to any lock that limits horizontal movement. Alarm systems are recommended for each residential and business unit. Solid walls in any stairway or decking should be avoided; this would serve to limit the visibility and provide a place for a criminal to hide while waiting for a resident to return home. Each unit should have their individual unit numbers listed clearly with the numbers at least 6" in height of a color that contrasts with the color of the building and preferably placed under a light. In addition, there should be some directive outside the building for visitors. This will also aid police or medics who respond to a call in finding the unit they need to go to. Page 1 of 2 • PROJECT LUA-99-141, SA-A, ECF 232 Burnett Avenue South City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET (Continuation) The underground parking will assist in protecting resident's vehicles from auto theft and theft from motor vehicle,but additional care should be taken when it comes to lighting the area. It would be my suggestion that any Metro Parking be street level solely. Having the underground parking for Metro passengers could invite trespassing from non- residents,but would also encourage theft from motor vehicle, which is already a burgeoning problem at area Park-n-Rides. Proper lighting will help residents feel safer traveling to and from their vehicle and will help protect the vehicles that will be parked at these locations. I would strongly recommend a security entrance at the residential parking level. Additional parking areas could be provided outside the building for non-residents and/or visitors.) It is recommended that the residential areas be secured with controlled entrances to dissuade trespassing of non-residents. Landscaping in and around the exterior of the property should not be too dense or high. It is important to allow visibility. Too much landscaping will give the property the look of a fortress and make the residents feel isolated, and could also possibly give a burglary sufficient coverage to break into a business or obtain access to the residential units inside. Page 2 of 2 rit, Trespass USINES Enforcement WATCH • Quite often, business owners and managers are faced with crimes that occur on the property after the businesses are closed and the employees have gone home. Some of the crimes that occur are burglary, vandalism, graffiti, trespassing, drug dealing and robbery in the parking lots. There is a way for police and business owners to discourage these types of crimes from taking place on private property, and that is by enforcing the City of Renton's Municipal Trespass Code 6-18-10. In order for police to be able to make an arrest for Trespass, business owners or managers need to purchase signs and display them in conspicuous areas on the property. These signs need to include the following language: 1. Indicate that the subject property is privately owned and; 2. Uninvited presence on the specified property is not permitted during the hours the business is closed, and; 3. Violators will be subject to criminal sanctions pursuant to Renton City Code 6-18-10. MOST IMPORTANTLY-THE SIGNS SHOULD BE CONSPICUOUS FROM ALL POSSIBLE POINTS OF ENTRY TO THE PROPERTY, AND ALSO BE PLACED ON THE EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDINGS. This way when a suspect is arrested, he/she will not be able to claim as a defense that he/she did not know he or she was trespassing. EXAMPLES FOR TRESPASS SIGNS: NO TRESPASSING NO TRESPASSING This is private property. Persons without specific No Trespassing after business hours business are not authorized to be on the premises between (insert specific times). Anyone on the the hours of(insert the hours your business is closed). premises after business hours is subject to Violators are subject to arrest and/or citation for criminal arrest and/or citation for Criminal Trespass pursuant to Renton City Code#6-18-10.. Trespass and/or impoundment of vehicle. Per Renton City Code #6-18-10. By enforcing the Trespass Ordinance, business owners and police will be sending a message to criminals that they are not allowed to conduct criminal activity on the property. In making arrests for Trespass, police may be preventing the more serious crimes from taking place. rvY COURTESY OF RENTON POLICE DEPARTMENT CRIME PREVENTION UNIT -N 235 - 2571 i City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: w\6vn:L 4 /-LktOMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 5, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-141,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 22, 1999 APPLICANT: Daily Homes PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen PROJECT TITLE: Sheridan Mixed Use Development WORK ORDER NO: 78591 LOCATION: 232 Burnett Ave. So.,between 2nd&3rd g �- SITE AREA: 42,061 sq.ft. I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A Eroyv 2 5 1919 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to demolish the existing Good Chevrolet auto service build'•• ,aye adrtstru.,ct a 4- story mixed use structure with a basement. The proposed building would contain a Metro park and no 'Op stofis 90 multi-family residential units with 90 stalls of associated parking, and approximately 4,100 sq. ft. of commeibat . . A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date routing Rev.10/93 • L4 _ CITY OF RENTON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, NEIGHBORHOODS,AND STRATEGIC PLANNING MEMORANDUM DATE: November 8, 1999 TO: Peter Rosen FROM: Don Erickson SUBJECT: Design Review Comments for Sheridan Mixed-use Building We have reviewed the subject application for consistency with the City's draft Multi-family Design Guidelines and found that in most areas the project complies quite well. There were, however, a couple of areas where either there was insufficient information to know whether the guidelines intent was being met, or, in the case of screening of parking areas it was felt that this had not yet been accomplished. The guidelines speak directly of the desirability of wholly screening parking garages located under a building through the combination of walls, decorative grilles, or trellis work or screening facades with landscaping and using architecturally compatible building materials to the residential portion of the building. In urban contexts, such as downtown, it is more likely that decorative grilles may be employed to screen parking areas visible from abutting sidewalks than bermed landscaping. The applicants, in this case, have indicated that the screening of the ventilation portals abutting the Burnett Avenue South sidewalk will be through the use security fence (chain link?) panels. We believe given the location of these portals along sidewalks being widened and beautified with decorative paving and lighting for transit riders as well as the introduction of expensive transit shelters, every effort should be made to use decorative screening such as that illustrated in the guidelines under B.3.C. Presumably, if the building designers understand the context they will want to employ screening that is more decorative and fitting of this location. Attached are our comments using the same matrix that the guidelines use. In fact, the guidelines are in the left column with our comments in the right. This format also facilitates quick reference back to the illustrations for one's convenience in cross-referencing. If you have any questions please let me know. Thanks, cc: \\TS SERVER\SYS2:\COMMON\-Document3\d • ILLUSTRATED MULTI-FAMILY DESIGN GUIDELINES Sheridan — Renton Development by Daily Homes; Thomas Harkey, Architects A. Building Siting and Design 1. Pedestrian Building Entries Reviewer's Comments A. Minimum Standard—Attached buildings Both Building"A" and `B"are oriented to Burnett shall be oriented to the street with clear Avenue with major entries facing on to the street connections to the sidewalk. A primary with connections to the sidewalk. These proposed entrance of each building shall be located on entrances are prominent,two-story elements that the façade facing the street. Such entrances will be easily identifiable by passersby. shall be prominent,visible from the street and connected by a walkway to the public sidewalk. (Modifications may be allowed as specified) B. Entries from the street should be clearly Both entries have canopies for weather protection marked with canopies, architectural and articulated cornice lines for visual interest. In elements,ornamental lighting, or addition, each corner entry element has a decorative landscaping. Entries from parking areas lattice type screen at the third story window at the should be subordinate to those related to the southwest corner of each building. street. The entry to the parking garage is located at the north end of the building on Second Street and is subordinate to the pedestrian entries on Burnett Avenue. C. Features such as entries,lobbies, and Entries to both Building"A"and Building`B" are display windows should be oriented to the oriented to the street right-of-way. Both buildings right-of-way; otherwise, screening with art have portions of their facades at ground level features such as trellises, artwork,murals, devoted to at-grade parking garages which are landscaping, or combinations thereof, should currently shown as being screened with"security be incorporated into the street-oriented fence". façade. Staff believes trellises, artwork or landscape screening could be employed to enhance these multiple openings to the parking garage without impairing security. D. Pedestrian pathways from public sidewalks Since building entrances abut the sidewalk both for to primary entrances, or from parking lots to the residential and commercial portions pedestrian primary entrances shall be accessible and pathways are not applicable in this case. should be clearly delineated. ATTACHED HOUSI ►L___•N GUIDELINES 2 11/04/99 A. Building Siting and Design, continued 1. Pedestrian Building Entries, continued Reviewer's Comments E. Multiple buildings on the same site should See comment above. Although there are two incorporated elements such as plazas, residential buildings they sit on a common base that walkways, and landscaping along pedestrian connects them at streetlevel. pathways to provide a clear view to destinations. F. Ground floor units should be directly Not applicable in this case since there are no ground accessible from the street. floor units. The ground floor is devoted to building lobbies,parking garage and some commercial space in the north end of Building`B". There will be approximately 4,100 sq. ft. of commercial space in this building, facing Burnett Avenue and Second Street. 2. Transition to Surrounding Development The two residential buildings depart in form from Careful siting and design treatment is necessary Don Daily's first building across the street in that to achieve a compatible transition where new they do not have decorative sloped roof elements. buildings differ from surrounding development Given that the texture of area changes to the east to in terms of building height,bulk and scale. The more flat roofed mixed-use retail, service, office following design elements shall be considered and residential use structures this form seem to promote a transition to surrounding uses: appropriate here. The four-story buildings will be slightly larger than surrounding buildings but the surround context is apt to change over the coming years as incremental redevelopment takes place. A. Setbacks at the side or rear of a building The residential portion of Building"A" is setback may be increased by the reviewing official approximately 13 feet from the rear property line. in order to reduce the bulk and scale of This sets the residential portion of this building larger buildings and so that sunlight reaches back from the Telephone Co. Building across the adjacent yards. alley. The residential portion of Building"B"is typically setback 4'-6' from the rear property line which indents along its northern portion 35' to the west away from the alley to avoid an existing building that will remain. Along 2nd Street the setback is 6'. ATTACHED HOUSING DESIGN E TES 3 11/04/99 A. Building Siting and Design, continued 2. Transition to Surrounding Development, Reviewer's Comments continued B. Building proportions, including stepbacks Along Burnett Avenue,Building "A" sets back 12'- on upper levels often helps to reduce the bulk 15' in the central portion of the building above the and scale of larger buildings; first-story base structure which houses the parking garage and building entrance. This terrace will be landscaped with Japanese Maples and scrubs, which will be visible from the units above and pedestrians across the street. The residential portion of Building `B"has only minor 4' deep setbacks in the articulated bays along the upper street façade. Both buildings,however, are separated by a 32'-37' wide courtyard above the one-story base element. C. Building articulation to divide larger The street facades of both Building"A" and Building architectural elements into smaller pieces; "B", except for the entry elements which are 38' wide, are articulated along Burnett Avenue every 26' with at least a 4-foot indentation. This modulation of this street façade divides the larger street elevation into architectural sub-elements that will help to reduce the apparent bulk of the building. D. Interesting roof lines utilizing pitches and Although neither Building"A"nor Building `B"has shapes such as gabled or hipped roofs. sloped roof elements the cornice line of both buildings has been broken up horizontal plane. Roof top elevations are shown to vary at least 8' in height, creating a variated roof line. This will further increase visual interest and help reduce the apparent bulk of the two buildings. E. Relationship to the street for entryways and At street-level,building entries are level with the setbacks; and/or sidewalk. This is appropriate for a commercial zone. ATTACHED HOUSI )1 N GUIDELINES 1111/ 4 11/04/99 A. Building Siting and Design, continued 2. Transition to Surrounding Development, Reviewer's Comments continued F. Use of architectural details or features Both buildings use articulated bays albeit not"bay such as bay windows,dormers,porches, windows". Some units will have individual finish materials,recessed entries, other balconies while others will have sliding doors with elements common to surrounding "spanish balconies. Finish materials vary from brick development. veneer at street level to multi-colored vinyl siding and metal siding elsewhere on the building. Although these latter materials have not traditionally been used in the surrounding area they will help break up the apparent mass of the building and add visual interest to the surrounding area. B. Parking, Access, Circulation: 1. Location of Parking Reviewer's Comments A. Minimum Standard—No parking shall be No parking has been provided between the located between a building and the front buildings and the street property lines along Burnett property line or the street side yard or a Avenue South and South Second Street. corner lot. 2. Design of Surface Parking A. Where multiple driveways are necessary, Not applicable. The only parking garage entry is provide landscaping to separate and located on the secondary for this project, South minimize the impact on the streetscape. Second Street. The garage entry has been pulled as far east as possible nearly abutting the existing alley, which will remain open. ATTACHED HOUSING DESIGN L TES • 5 11/04/99 B. Parking, Access, Circulation, continued 2. Design of Surface Parking, continued Reviewer's Comments B. Surface parking areas should be screened No surface parking is proposed for this by landscaping and/or fencing from development. surrounding properties. C. Lighting shall not spill onto adjacent Exterior lighting has not been indicated on the properties and lighting should incorporate elevations. Sconces on columns at street-level or cut-off shields to prevent off-site glare. fixtures in the canopies could increase street illumination and safety. Likewise, security lighting on the alley side might be warranted. 3. Structure/Garage Parking Reviewer's Comments A. Parking garage entries should be designed As noted above,the garage entry has been located at and sited to complement,but not the northern end of the base building near the alley. subordinate the pedestrian entry. If It is not near any pedestrian entry and has been possible, locate the parking entry away pulled away from the storefronts at the corner to from the street,to either the side or rear of reduce conflicts. the building. B. Parking garage entries should not It is difficult to tell from the submitted drawings dominate the streetscape. whether the garage door is decorative or purely utilitarian in design. If possible the entry should be pulled back a sufficient amount so that cars waiting for the garage door to open do not block the sidewalk along South Second Street. ATTACHED HOUS111110D] iN GUIDELINES 6 11/04/99 B. Parking, Access, Circulation, continued 3. Structure/Garage Parking, continued Reviewer's Comments C. Parking at grade under a building shall Although much of the at-grade and below grade minimize the apparent width of the garage parking areas are screened by building elements entries and the volume of parking by being such as entryways and commercial frontage there completely enclosed within the building or still remain 142 feet of structured parking that is wholly screened through any combination of exposed to Burnett Avenue South behind security walls, decorative grilles, or trellis work with fence type openings. landscaping. Staff encourage the applicant to consider the use of decorative grilles, screens to support vines, or other landscape devices such as pyramidal evergreen shrubs to visually soften these openings. D. Garage facades should be screened with Please see previous comment. landscaping or bermed with evergreen landscape materials. E. Parking garages should be designed to be The highly visible portions of the lower level architecturally compatible with the parking garage is screened with commercial space residential portion of the building. Use at the northwest corner of the garage as well as with similar forms,materials, and details to the entry lobbies to the two residential buildings enhance garages. that are sited above it. In addition the street facing facades of the garage are faced in brick veneer, a durable and attractive material. With a more decorative treatment of the garage portals visible on Burnett Avenue South, the parking garage can become more architecturally compatible with the residential portion of the buildings above and pedestrian friendly. F. Garage parking should be secured with Although not indicated it is assumed that the garage electronic entries. entry will be electronically secured. . ATTACHED HOUSING DESIGN L 1ES • 7 11/04/99 B. Parking, Access, Circulation, continued G. The street side of parking garages should Reviewer's Comments incorporate one of the following uses in street-facing facades: 1. Retail or service commercial uses in the Although not all of the street facade of the parking Center Downtown (CD) zone. garage is faced with retail or service uses,nearly 2/3rds of its combined S. 2nd Street and Burnett Avenue S. facades is devoted to non-parking garage uses. 2. Facilities or services for residents, like Both residential buildings "A" and `B" have lobbies recreation rooms, or building lobbies. at street-level. In addition, there is a Metro lobby in Building`B", to the north. 3. Residential units that have access directly to Not applicable. None of the residential units in this street. development have access directly to the street since the first level is devoted to parking,building lobbies, and commercial. ATTACHED HOUSI )] iN GUIDELINES ' 8 11/04/99 B. Parking, Access, Circulation, continued 4. Vehicular Access Reviewer's Comments A. Parking lots and garges should be As noted above the applicants have achieved this accessed from alleys or side streets where bringing the access to the garage in from South 2nd possible. Street near the entrance to the alley at the northeastern corner of the building. B. Driveways shall be located to be visible The proponents are providing only one entrance to from the right-of-way but not impede the parking garage which is itself bisected with the pedestrian circulation on-site or to adjoining first half serving Metro and the second gated half properties. Where possible,minimize the serving the residents. number of driveways and curb-cuts. Staff have suggested that the door or gate of the garage be pulled a sufficient distance L 16') so that cars waiting to enter do not block the sidewalk. 5. Pedestrian Circulation A. Developments should include an integrated Access to upper courtyards,parking, and lobbies is pedestrian circulation system that internal to the building and relies on a combination connects buildings, open space, and parking of stairs, corridors, and lobbies. areas with the adjacent street sidewalk system. B. Pedestrian pathways should be delineated The applicant is encouraged to provide delineated separate from vehicle circulation by using a pedestrian pathways in the parking garage to variation in paved texture and color, and/or increase pedestrian safety. Such corridors are often landscaping. delineated with painted yellow stripping over a painted green background. ATTACHED HOUSING DESIGN E TES 9 11/04/99 C. Common Useable Open Space 1. Common Useable Open Space Reviewer's Comments A. Minimum Standard—Attached housing The applicants are proposing slightly over 50 sq. ft. developments of 10 or more dwelling units of open space per unit. The 90 units would have shall provide a minimum area of common 5,200 sq. ft. of open space, or about 57 sq. ft. per open space or recreation area equal to 50 unit. square feet per unit. The common open • space area should be aggregated to provide There are essentially two landscaped courtyards, usable area(s) for residents. The required one 3,920 sq. ft. and the other 1,150 sq. ft. in open space may be satisfied with one or addition to a number of other smaller more linear more of the following elements: open spaces along the perimeter of the building. 1. Courtyards,plazas or multi-purpose There are three or four small courtyards proposed on green-spaces. the roof of the parking garage for resident's use. 2. Upper level common decks,patios, See comments above. terraces, or roof gardens. 3. Pedestrian corridors dedicated to passive All common open spaces are separated from the recreation and separate from the public public street system since there are located one- street system. story above streetlevel. ATTACHED HOUSI ): iN GUIDELINES 10 11/04/99 C. Common Useable Open Space, continued A. Minimum Standard, continued Reviewer's Comments 4. Recreation facilities including but not limited to tennis/sports courts, swimming pools, exercise areas, game rooms, or other similar facilities. 5. Children's play space. No children's playspace has been indicated on the landscape plan for the open spaces. This may reflect the fact that these are typically smaller units oriented to young singles, empty nesters, and childless couples. B. Location and Layout of Recreation and Open Space—The location, layout, and proposed type of open space or recreation area shall be subject to approval by the Development Services Director. The Director shall consider the following guidelines in approving the required open space or recreation area. 1. Open space areas shall be centrally The roof top landscaped courtyards appear to be located so they are near a majority of units, centrally located and accessible to residents of both accessible and usable to residents, and Building"A"and"B". As new development occurs visible from surrounding dwelling units. in the area the spaces at the back of the building could become visible to residents in new mixed use buildings on Williams. • ATTACHED HOUSING DESIGN ___D TES 11 11/04/99 C. Common Useable Open Space, continued 2. Open space areas should be located to take Given the strong urban context for this project and advantage of surrounding features such as zoning which allows 90-foot high buildings, the building entrances, significant landscaping, proposed courtyards could have reduced solar unique topography or architecture, and exposure. solar exposure. The courtyards/open spaces fronting on Burnett Avenue South have the best chance of receiving prolonged solar exposure since there will never be large buildings directly across the street if the Transit Center,the Pavilion Building and Piazza are built as planned. 3. Children's play space shall be centrally Not applicable. See comments above. located, visible from the dwellings, and away from hazardous areas like garbage dumpsters, drainage facilities, streets and parking areas. 4. No required landscaping, driveways, Not applicable to this application. parking or other vehicular use areas can be counted toward the common space requirement. 5. Required yard setback areas shall not count There are no required yard setback areas in the toward outdoor recreation and open space Downtown Core Area where this project is located. unless such areas are developed as courtyards,plazas or passive use areas containing landscaping and fencing sufficient to create a fully usable area accessible to all residents of the development. 6. Decks,balconies and private ground floor These do not appear to have been counted in the 50 open space shall not count toward the open sq. ft. per unit common open space calculation. space/recreation area requirement. 7. Other required landscaping, and sensitive Not applicable. area buffers without common access links such as pedestrian trails, shall not be included toward the required recreation and open space requirement ATTACHED HOUSE E N GUIDELINES 111110 12 11/04/99 D. Building Architectural Design 1. Building Character and Massing Reviewer's Comments A. Minimum Standard—All building facades All street facing building facades above the first shall include modulation or articulation at story base structure have been modulated as well intervals of no more than 40 feet. articulated using different building materials, colors, etc. The back(east elevation)of building "A"has not been modulated nor has the southern half of the eastern elevation of Building`B". The northern portion of Building`B"that will be visible from South 2nd Street has been modulated. B. Intent—Building facades should be modulated and/or articulated with architectural elements to 1)reduce the apparent size of new buildings,2)break up long blank walls and add visual interest, and 3)enhance the character of the neighborhood. The following methods of building modulation and articulation should be used such that the combination of features meets the intent of this provision. A variety of modulations and articulations should be employed to add visual interest and to reduce the bulk and scale of large projects. 1. Building Modulation—building The applicants appear to have met these minimum modulations shall be a minimum of 2' in standards where modulation has been provided. depth and 4' in width. Alternative methods to shape a building such as angled or curved facade elements, offset planes, wind wall, and terracing,will be considered,provided that the intent of this section is met. 2. Building Articulation—The following methods of articulation should be used in combination to project a residential character: ATTACHED HOUSING DESIGN ___I✓ TES • 13 11/04/99 D. Building Character and Massing, continued a. Articulate each interval with features such Building element intervals facing public streets have as a balcony,bay window,porch,patio, been articulated with balconies in some cases, deck, or clearly defined entry. decks,cornices,variable height floors, changed surface materials, etc. b. Provide a pedestrian scaled element for Most elements have pedestrian scaled windows at each interval such as a lighting fixture, the residential levels. trellis, or other landscape feature. c. Provide architectural features such as A variety of features have been provided that meet indentations, overhangs,projections, this guideline. cornices,bays, canopies, or awnings. d. Use of material variations such as colors, A variety of building materials including brick, brick or metal banding, or textural vinyl siding and metal siding are proposed to help changes. visually break up the facades of the buildings and provide visual interest. e. Use of artwork or building ornamentation Although none have been included staff are (such as mosaics,murals, grillwork, suggesting that decorative grills possibly be sculptures,relief,etc.). incorporated on the streetside of the parking garage where open portals will look into the garage. ATTACHED HOUSE F N GUIDELINES ` 14 11/04/99 D. Building Character and Massing, continued f. Use of recessed building entries,plazas or A number of these features have been provided courtyards, or seating and planting areas. including courtyards,building lobbies, and landscaped setbacks. 2. Building Rooflines—Building rooflines Although the roofs of these two buildings are flat, should be varied by emphasizing dormers, they have been articulated with variated parapet and chimneys, stepped roofs, gables,prominent ceiling heights. This will create a more interesting cornice or fascia, or a broke or articulated roof line than if it were all the same elevation or roofline. height. A. Rooftop equipment screening should use The applicant has not yet indicated how roof top materials that are architecturally compatible equipment will be screened. with the building. 3. Building Materials—All building exterior The applicant has not yet provided this level of finishes should be durable, of high quality, detail for this project. easily maintained and add visual interest and detail. Materials that have an attractive texture,pattern, or quality of detailing are encouraged. ATTACHED HOUSING DESIGN ) ES 15 11/04/99 D. Building Character and Massing, continued A. Guidelines for Exterior Finish Materials Reviewer's Comments 1. Siding should reflect in texture and color An noted above the applicant is proposing brick typical Northwest building patterns like veneer facing at street-level and vinyl and metal wood siding and shingles,brick, stone, and siding above. terra-cotta tile. 2. Metal siding should always have visible This level of detail has not yet been provided. corner moldings and trim. 3. Concrete walls should be enhanced by This level of detail has not yet been provided. texturing, coloring with a concrete coating or admixture, or by incorporating embossed or sculpted surfaces,mosaics, or artwork 4. Concrete block walls should be enhanced This level of detail has not yet been provided. with textured blocks and colored mortar, decorative bond pattern and/or incorporating other masonry materials. ATTACHED HOUSI )] iN GUIDELINES 16 11/04/99 D. Building Character and Massing, continued 5. Stucco and similar troweled finishes This level of detail has not yet been provided. should be trimmed in wood or masonry and should be sheltered from extreme weather by roof overhangs or other methods. City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 'p(,u,l COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 5, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-141,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 22, 1999 APPLICANT: Daily Homes PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen PROJECT TITLE: Sheridan Mixed Use Development WORK ORDER NO: 78591 LOCATION: 232 Burnett Ave. So., between 2nd&3rd SITE AREA: 42,061 sq.ft. I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to demolish the existing Good Chevrolet auto service building and construct a 4- story mixed use structure with a basement. The proposed building would contain a Metro park and ride with 150 stalls, 90 multi-family residential units with 90 stalls of associated parking, and approximately 4,100 sq. ft. of commercial area. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet • 4i ;/ a/2/7/11/w i'S7 arc o l G u m. / 'lie(AI( f B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS ,,,(/),„6, 2/Karivi-1.-/7 - cit_a- (-A(--L-1 ,_,/ 1-(/72'7 - a Y'LL Mej/C1J tSe/I24- a s S f" 1 c G ,4- /7C-� . _CODE-RELATED COME TS c -(7 c_4<)Wk �� , G! G aCI • �� 16c -moo ( 2x7 .e A°rA" i We have reviewed this application with particular attention to th se areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas whey additional information ' eeded to properly assess this proposal. 17 1 a4C --- I-1/7/ nat re o irec or or Aut o ized Representative Date routing Rev.10/93 CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM Date: November 6, 1999 To: Peter Rosen From: Kayren K. Kittrick, Plan Review Subject: Sheridan Mixed-Use Development LUA-99-141, SA-A, ECF EXISTING CONDITIONS WATER - There are existing water mains in Burnett Avenue S and S 2nd Street ranging in size from 8-inch to 24-inch diameter. The proposed project is not located in an Aquifer Protection zone, but is in the downtown 196 pressure zone. There are fire hydrants in the vicinity that may be counted towards the fire protection of this site, but are subject to verification for being within 150 or 300 feet of the nearest corner of the proposed building. SEWER - There are existing 8-inch and 12-inch diameter sanitary sewer mains serving this site STORM - A preliminary storm drainage plan per King County Surface Water Design standards has been submitted with the application. Downstream drainage facilities exist in city streets and public facilities. STREETS - Full street improvements including, but not limited to paving, sidewalks, curb & gutter, street signs and street lights exist and are required to be brought up to City of Renton standards if damaged or missing. The City of Renton will place new construction with improvements planned for the new transit center and Burnett Avenue CODE REQUIREMENTS WATER 1. The System Development Charge shall be determined upon final sizing of the domestic and fire services for the building. Credit for the existing services to the building will be allowed under the redevelopment ordinance. SANITARY SEWER 1. The System Development Charge shall be determined upon final sizing of the domestic and fire services for the building. Credit for the existing services to the building will be allowed under the redevelopment ordinance. SURFACE WATER 1. The System Development Charge shall not apply as no new net impervious surface is created with this project. TRANSPORTATION sheridan gf 1. A Traffic Mitigation Fee of $75.00 per additional Average Daily Trip shall be assessed. This fee has been calculated based on a total of 553.24 new trips for a fee of$41,493. PLAN REVIEW - GENERAL 1. All plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. 2. A construction permit is required for each new side sewer connection. Separate water permits for the domestic and fire vaults and meters are required. When plans are complete three copies of the drawings, two copies of the drainage report, a construction estimate, application and appropriate fee shall be submitted to the sixth floor counter. 3. Franchise utilities construction requires separate permits by each owner utility. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS 1. All utility construction shall be coordinated with the City of Renton Burnett Avenue improvements. All services shall be installed and in place, including any franchise utility installations, prior to final lift of pavement for Burnett Avenue. sheridan gf tc qve 11 City of Department of Planning/Building/Public worKs ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:S 1 `� Yalu,- COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 5, 1999 °Rye APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-141,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 22, 1999 nt-s., ION APPLICANT: Daily Homes PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen QCI- 75 1399 PROJECT TITLE: Sheridan Mixed Use Development WORK ORDER NO: 78591 BUILD LOCATION: 232 Burnett Ave. So., between 2nd&3rd ''vim UI V ITN SITE AREA: 42,061 sq.ft. BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to demolish the existing Good Chevrolet auto service building and construct a 4- story mixed use structure with a basement. The proposed building would contain a Metro park and ride with 150 stalls, 90 multi-family residential units with 90 stalls of associated parking, and approximately 4,100 sq. ft. of commercial area. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS �F J%IAO D ABC 1� l i ke I ti We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additionall. information is needed to properly assess this proposa Kdaiikc,k (/(1, k Sig u e � of Director or Authorized Representative Date routing Rev.10/93 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:— c fu -allQy1 COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 5, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-141,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 22, 1W9y OF RFA-q-r•` APPLICANT: Daily Homes PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen Pi''" PROJECT TITLE: Sheridan Mixed Use Development WORK ORDER NO: 78591 OCT 2 5 1999 LOCATION: 232 Burnett Ave. So., between 2nd&3rd SITE AREA: 42,061 sq.ft. BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A Bu�L.�IfIVIa UIV151VN SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to demolish the existing Good Chevrolet auto service building and construct al 4- story mixed use structure with a basement. The proposed building would contain a Metro park and ride with 150 stalls, 90 multi-family residential units with 90 stalls of associated parking, and approximately 4,100 sq. ft. of commercial area. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS 5 L ATrAC-1 t CAicoLAT1oL SN(=EN -t Wtell-tc 6AWE) 1t/(o I Ci y We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. I/CO 1 qf Sig fia of Director or Authorized Representative Date routing Rev.10/93 y�Y • U � � • bh aY rit);„,„.,--ctiWaittirAas. w- w.evu � .v�+-••� f:<!'W.wI.FYvI /L.w�,+w.i�1..MXYw�•'v`l�'.:�YMA.4`r/leM I`�.��_w- 0 4l.W.rV NNFEE Project Name 5hcv!d4 A40e ( U.d/De di _ Project Address 232 3u✓nc ri Ave- S. • Contact Person C hew 1.-c:bocfq Address Phone Number 206 - 328 3770 E X7` 2// • Permit Number L 0A. - � l - 1 y Project Description De o e//570(i 4u7O sa ks/5c✓%e 1,10(l ,000 sf ) d coN57vua ' 51O/ vu,xer.' u4,,c hl axit 610 uci,7) 4 >I,100 s.f. cv14,00- rr,41 SP A150 METRO a� a-'f vide -fc-) 150 5P4c.el Land Use/Type: Method of Calculation: Ex;51"u/ ' " ° sceks4evv,L.( - 1 �Residential a ITE Trip Generation Manual See 7/1216 1ra�7 ORetail 0 Traffic Study a-�a stay Non-retail CI Other i Ik«' Uses - 5<.e fit 2 gy- R�sic�r•r7i«� - 4.62 /ael Calculation: ,/se hasccl ov1 aveve'le V e-'41k . - 1-10,67 fa4 iovv , 24`7c pVi i .y rat,Ed ateA et 4I4 S(zC �— — - y Purf - I.T6-(40) [CifZDvO (14-2326)) _nO, : )(ZG.27)4 �57,Z2)1 (/ ) = 57q.25 r/ps raiz 7G 4 r0U-\(o.z5) 4.5 r1,s � spucz I�)cw vsc ' (4,62)(gOr) - (4U,G7)( ro" � ) t (U.5)(160) = cl"ail„1 �/es Re S,L('_Ni,K,1 Cv:N,lieva(1.ce P $�,ca{ )Jet duly tv)A3 7 (1!3z -1-1q)- (57q.2 ) = 553,214 tr,os - AZ 175 r2 tv7p ( $75) (565.2U) _ $4/,443 Transportation Mitigation Fee: '-/ 443- `'(2 Calculated by: ma a a/c( / Date: AJ _ Z I q'79f Account Number: 1OS. 5 ?q. 3180, 70. 00. Date of Payment • . City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ( R.evter LI_ -aJIy- COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER A19 4 r>99rw.-►'TON APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-141,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 22, 19g9 APPLICANT: Daily Homes PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen flr•T 1999 PROJECT TITLE: Sheridan Mixed Use Development WORK ORDER NO: 78591 nd v, .w�.7�BUILUli1N LOCATION: 232 Burnett Ave. So., between 2 &3rd QN SITE AREA: 42,061 sq.ft. I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to demolish the existing Good Chevrolet auto service building and construct a 4- story mixed use structure with a basement. The proposed building would contain a Metro park and ride with 150 stalls, 90 multi-family residential units with 90 stalls of associated parking, and approximately 4,100 sq. ft. of commercial area. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS SEE. tA O -AT—� k k I toll We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Sig ma'-� of Director or Authorized Representative Dat routing 'J Rev.10/93 - City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: r-' a vt+tctit COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 5, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-141,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 22, 199PRE DEPT APPLICANT: Daily Homes PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen PROJECT TITLE: Sheridan Mixed Use Development WORK ORDER NO: 78591 OCT 2 2 1999 LOCATION: 232 Burnett Ave.So., between 2nd&3rd Rh Lt.^ e SITE AREA: 42,061 sq.ft. BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to demolish the existing Good Chevrolet auto service building and construct a 4- story mixed use structure with a basement. The proposed building would contain a Metro park and ride with 150 stalls, 90 multi-family residential units with 90 stalls of associated parking, and approximately 4,100 sq. ft. of commercial area. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation • Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet /d0 /114 t- ��a�fs • 4(j 7 B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS /0Q- C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS / _ We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where a,ditional informal'. , is needed to properly assess this proposal. /# 699 Signa • DirectorAutho 'ed R-•resentative Date routing / Rev.10/93 TY + © + CITY OF RENTON FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU MEMORANDUM DATE: October 26, 1999 TO: Peter Rosen, Planner FROM: Jim Gray, Assistant Fire Marsha sal - SUBJECT: Sheridan Mixed Use Building, Fire Department Comments: 1. The preliminary fire flow is 6250 GPM based on Type V 1 Hr. construction with a 4-hour wall on south side. One hydrant is required within 150 feet of the structure and Six additional hydrants are required within 300 feet of the structure. The fire flow may be reduced by going to a more restrictive type of construction. 2. A fire mitigation fee of$55,252.00 is required based on $.52 a square foot of the commercial square footage and $388.00 per unit of the residential portion of the building. The basement parking area is included in the fee for the residential part of the building. 3. Separate plans and permits are required for the installation of the fire alarm and sprinkler systems. 4. The basement parking area will need standpipes, exit stairwell enclosures and ventilation. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. • City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: (ClAS jt Se.q,Vt r COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 5, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-141,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBE}99 APPLICANT: Daily Homes PROJECT MANAGER: Peter(ICY' {Jy ,• PROJECT TITLE: Sheridan Mixed Use Development WORK ORDER NO: 7 91 ' ?S LOCATION: 232 Burnett Ave.So., between 2nd&3rd ���w,, 7999 l., SITE AREA: 42,061 sq.ft. BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A "-*1 v,�.: SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to demolish the existing Good Chevrolet auto service building atonstruct a 4- story mixed use structure with a basement. The proposed building would contain a Metro park and ride with 150 stalls, 90 multi-family residential units with 90 stalls of associated parking, and approximately 4,100 sq. ft. of commercial area. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air • Aesthetics _ Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS C t r U. .c . 14 / 7 c a We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. ' ( ' 99 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date routing Rev.10/93 CITY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION LIST OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS within 300 feet of the subject site F' ` ` PROJECT NAME: PGA L`� ��� /T�t tc-yVOlt‘4--et 1 APPLICATION NO: I--U -9 i ` t The following is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. The Development Services Division will notify these individuals of the proposed development. NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER aft-zta-1 O, ti A ��• ��jNQb .N • / 0� Oi, Ato 18,9,9 :0. gib _� .4i V 4•� s :1;46 wog • M'101 ••• �• '•••.•••••• (Attach additional sheets, if necessary) (Continued) NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER - Applicant Certification ('1JiirilV L44i Pdg- hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property (Print Name) owners and their addresses were obtained from: D City of Renton Technical Services Records lir Titl Company Records D Ki g County Assessors Records /'( D/L vY �� 17 •'��,1p��' .. Signe Date .•' 0 NE' � (APp' ant) 4'.3.004. '•./ NOTARY :Icr4.41!:." i + ..►' , • ATTESTED: ubscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for th4 0 of a , residing at e., on the 1 111 day of G U a tit,' J (i Signed ,�.1 .�-. :�0 Q-�"Q-.0 �• **",��'Of'Nt ••• (Notary Pubic) ****For City of Renton Use**** CERTIFICATION OF MAILING I, _'_VA ( 'e ;- , hereby certify that notices of the proposed application were mailed to (City Employee) each listed property owner on ° 1 a7 Signed p'A ,5 t G,,, '. , _ Date: NOTARY ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing ate t 0,-) on the . _._day of Q r .,r .. ,%; Signed 1 / —` T• . �i a` OTATZ Jr t1VA311INGTON listprop.doc MARILYN KAMCHEFF y COMMISSION EXPIRES REV 07/98 MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES:6-29-03 t` JUN=20,2003 2 ******************************* * Search Parameters * ******************************* * King (WA) * 09/27/1999 * 00:00 :00 ******************************* Parcel Number. . .48 723150 2185 723150 2085 723150 2210 723150 2220 723150 2225 723150 2245 723150 2265 723150 1970 723150 1979 723150 1825 723150 1830 723150 1845 723150 1850 723150 1870 723150 1875 723150 1880 723150 1900 723150 1905 723150 1910 723150 1920 723150 1930 723150 1935 723150 1940 723150 1755 723150 1820 723150 1770 723150 2370 723150 2271 783930 0230 783930 0240 569600 0050 569600 0055 569600 0065 569600 0070 569600 0075 569600 0080 569600 0085 569600 0090 569600 0105 569600 0115 569600 0120 569600 0200 569600 0210 569600 0215 182305 9262 # 1 • * . MetroScan / King : --- All . Owner :Burlington Northrn Santa Fe Parcel # :182305 9262 02 Site :S 2 Burnett Renton Sale Date . Mail :1700 E Golf Rd #400 Schaumburg Il 60173 Sale Price . Use :422 Pub,Parking,Commercial Lots Asd.V : $211, 900 Lgl :STR 182305 TAXLOT 262 ABANDONED Q:NE S:18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories : BldgSF: Ac: .64 YB: Ph: # 2 * MetroScan / King * Owner :City Of Renton Parcel # :569600 0050 07 Site :233 Burnett Ave S Renton 98055 Sale Date :07/07/1995 Mail :200 Mill Ave S Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price :$900, 000 Full Use :403 Pub,Automotive,Retail Asd.V :$23, 800 Lgl :BLK 2 LOT 1 MOTOR LINE ADD TO Q:SE S:18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories : BldgSF: Ac: .05 YB: Ph: # 3 * MetroScan / King * Owner :City Of Renton Parcel # :569600 0055 02 Site :233 Burnett Ave S Renton 98055 Sale Date :05/02/1997 Mail :233 Burnett Ave S Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price :$1, 000, 000 Full Use :403 Pub,Automotive,Retail Asd.V :$377, 000 Lgl :BLK 2 LOT POR MOTOR LINE ADD TO Q:SE S:18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF:23, 740 Ac: .67 YB: Ph: # 4 * MetroScan / King * Owner :City Of Renton Parcel # :569600 0065 00 Site :233 Burnett Ave S Renton 98055 Sale Date :05/02/1997 Mail :200 Mill Ave S Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price :$1, 000, 000 Full Use :403 Pub,Automotive,Retail Asd.V :$47,500 Lgl :BLK 2 LOT 4 MOTOR LINE ADD TO Q:SE S:18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories : BldgSF: Ac: .11 YB: Ph: # 5 * MetroScan / King * Owner :City Of Renton Parcel # :569600 0070 03 Site :233 Burnett Ave S Renton 98055 Sale Date :05/02/1997 Mail :233 Burnett Ave S Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price :$1, 000, 000 Full Use :403 Pub,Automotive,Retail Asd.V :$47, 500 Lgl :BLK 2 LOT 5 MOTOR LINE ADD TO Q:SE S:18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: .11 YB: Ph: # 6 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Renton City Parcel # :569600 0075 08 Site :233 Burnett Ave S Renton 98055 Sale Date :11/03/1997 Mail :200 Mill Ave S Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price . Use :403 Pub,Automotive,Retail Asd.V :$47, 500 Lgl :BLK 2 LOT 6 MOTOR LINE ADD TO Q:SE S:18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: .11 YB: Ph:425-235-2500 # 7 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Renton City Parcel # :569600 0080 01 Site :233 Burnett Ave S Renton 98055 Sale Date :11/03/1997 Mail :233 Burnett Ave S Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price . Use :403 Pub,Automotive,Retail Asd.V :$47, 500 Lgl :BLK 2 LOT 7 MOTOR LINE ADD TO Q:SE S:18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: .11 YB: Ph: # 8 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Yokel Alvin John Parcel # :569600 0085 06 Site :204 Logan Ave S Renton 98055 Sale Date :03/03/1998 Mail :30925 Webster Rd E Eatonville Wa 98328 Sale Price . Use :403 Pub,Automotive,Retail Asd.V :$47, 500 Lgl :BLK 2 LOT 8 MOTOR LINE ADD TO Q:SE S:18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: .11 YB: Ph: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. # 9 . * - MetroScan / King : ---- * Owner :Williams Thomas H Parcel # :569600 0090 09 Site :603 S 2Nd St Renton 98055 Sale Date . Mail :13329 SE 253Rd P1 Kent Wa 98042 Sale Price . Use :403 Pub,Automotive,Retail Asd.V :$211, 300 Lgl :BLK 2 LOT 9-10-11 MOTOR LINE ADD Q:SE S:18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:1 BldgSF:2, 908 Ac: .40 YB:1963 Ph:253-631-0149 # 10 * MetroScan / King * Owner :City Of Renton Parcel # :569600 0105 02 Site :215 Burnett Ave S Renton 98055 Sale Date :01/12/1998 Mail :200 Mill Ave S Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price :$210, 000 Full Use :108 Res,Single Family Residence,Comm Us Asd.V :$125, 900 Lgl :BLK 2 LOT 12-13 MOTOR LINE ADD TO Q:SE S :18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:2 BldgSF:2, 628 Ac: .29 YB:1908 Ph: # 11 * MetroScan / King * Owner :City Of Renton Parcel # :569600 0115 00 Site :219 Burnett Ave S Renton 98055 Sale Date :07/07/1995 Mail :200 Mill Ave S Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price :$900, 000 Full Use :403 Pub,Automotive,Retail Asd.V :$59, 500 Lgl :BLK 2 LOT 14 MOTOR LINE ADD TO Q:SE S:18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: .14 YB: Ph: # 12 * MetroScan / King * Owner :City Of Renton Parcel # :569600 0120 03 Site :219 Burnett Ave S Renton 98055 Sale Date :07/07/1995 Mail :200 Mill Ave S Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price :$900, 000 Full Use :403 Pub,Automotive,Retail Asd.V :$59, 500 Lgl :BLK 2 LOT 15 MOTOR LINE ADD TO Q:SE S:18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: Ac: .14 YB: Ph: # 13 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Washington Mutual Savgings Bank Parcel # :569600 0200 06 Site :150 Logan Ave S Renton 98055 Sale Date :12/01/1993 Mail :1191 2Nd Ave #950 Seattle Wa 98101 Sale Price :$1, 267, 600 Full Use :404 Pub,Bank Asd.V :$680, 000 Lgl :BLK 4 LOT 1-2 MOTOR LINE ADD TO Q:NE S:18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:2 BldgSF:7, 294 Ac: .45 YB:1968 Ph: # 14 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Washington Mutual Savings Bank Parcel # :569600 0210 04 Site :150 Logan Ave S Renton 98055 Sale Date :12/01/1993 Mail :1191 2Nd Ave #950 Seattle Wa 98101 Sale Price :$1,267,600 Full Use :404 Pub,Bank Asd.V :$68,400 Lgl :BLK 4 LOT 3 MOTOR LINE ADD TO Q:NE S :18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: .20 YB: Ph: # 15 * MetroScan / King * Owner :King Jerry M & Janice E Parcel # :569600 0215 09 Site :126 Logan Ave S Renton 98055 Sale Date :02/05/1987 Mail :31620 176Th Ave SE Auburn Wa 98092 Sale Price :$240, 000 Use :408 Pub,Clubs,Business,Labor,Fraternal Asd.V :$212, 100 Lgl :BLK 4 LOT 4 MOTOR LINE ADD TO Q:NE S :18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:1 BldgSF:6, 100 Ac: .19 YB:1958 Ph:253-630-7933 # 16 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Duff William E Parcel # :723150 1755 00 Site :801 S 3Rd St Renton 98055 Sale Date :12/09/1996 Mail :308 Washington Ave Mukilteo Wa 98275 Sale Price : Use :251 Com,Retail Store,Less Than 10K Sqft Asd.V :$252, 600 Lgl :BLK 21 LOT 1 RENTON TOWN OF Q:SW S :17 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:1 B1dgSF:5, 968 Ac: .13 YB:1964 Ph:425-347-7153 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. # 17 . * MetroScan / King : ---- * Owner :Imel Kenneth;Templin-Intel Garnet L Parcel # :723150 1770 01 Site :308 Williams Ave S Renton 98055 Sale Date :07/14/1999 Mail :306 Williams Ave S Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price . Use :431 Pub, Postal Services Asd.V :$649, 100 Lgl :BLK 21 LOT 2 THRU 9 RENTON TOWN OF Q:SW S :17 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:1 BldgSF:11, 236 Ac: .86 YB:1938 Ph: # 18 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Porcello Bldg Parcel # :723150 1820 01 Site :811 S 3Rd St Renton 98055 Sale Date . Mail :1817 Jones Ave NE Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price . Use :252 Com,Retail Store, 10K-25K Sqft Asd.V :$710,400 Lgl :BLK 21 LOT 10-11 RENTON TOWN OF Q:SW S :17 T:23N R: 05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories :2 BldgSF:18, 150 Ac: .27 YB:1940 Ph: # 19 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Super Shops Inc Parcel # :723150 1825 06 Site :801 S 2Nd St Renton 98055 Sale Date :12/30/1983 Mail :5363 S Kenyon St Seattle Wa 98118 Sale Price :$190, 750 Use :252 Com,Retail Store, 10K-25K Sqft Asd.V :$373, 100 Lgl :BLK 22 LOT 1-2 RENTON TOWN OF LOTS Q:SW S :17 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories :1 BldgSF:10, 660 Ac: .25 YB:1946 Ph: # 20 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Super Shops Inc Parcel # :723150 1825 06 Site :801 S 2Nd St Renton 98055 Sale Date :12/30/1983 Mail :5363 S Kenyon St Seattle Wa 98118 Sale Price :$190, 750 Use :252 Com,Retail Store, 10K-25K Sqft Asd.V :$373, 100 Lgl :BLK 22 LOT 1-2 RENTON TOWN OF LOTS Q:SW S :17 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories :1 BldgSF:14, 560 Ac: .25 YB:1946 Ph: # 21 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Super Shops Inc Parcel # :723150 1830 09 Site :Wells Ave S Renton Sale Date :12/30/1983 Mail :PO Box 8457 San Bernardino Ca 92412 Sale Price :$190, 750 Use :401 Pub,Parking,Associated Asd.V :$51,400 Lgl :BLK 22 LOT 3 RENTON TOWN OF LESS Q:SW S:17 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories : BldgSF: Ac: .12 YB: Ph: # 22 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Rosa James D Parcel # :723150 1845 02 Site :208 Williams Ave S Renton 98055 Sale Date . Mail :2724 Benson Rd S Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price . Use :425 Pub,Restaurant,Lounges Asd.V :$168,600 Lgl :BLK 22 LOT 4 RENTON TOWN OF LESS Q:SW S:17 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:1 BldgSF:5, 790 Ac: .12 YB:1952 Ph:425-255-0831 # 23 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Pham Tuyenl;Nguyen Bao Ngoc Parcel # :723150 1850 04 Site :226 Williams Ave S Renton 98055 Sale Date :06/10/1997 Mail :1000 N 33Rd St Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price :$573, 000 Full Use :262 Off, l-3 Story,5K To 15K Sqft Asd.V :$570, 600 Lgl :BLK 22 LOT 5-6-7-8 RENTON TOWN OF Q:SW S:17 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:2 BldgSF:11,200 Ac: .51 YB:1954 Ph:425-271-1580 # 24 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Cugini Land & Timber Co Parcel # :723150 1870 00 Site :800 S 3Rd St Renton 98055 Sale Date :07/08/1991 Mail :PO Box 359 Renton Wa 98057 Sale Price . Use :251 Com,Retail Store,Less Than 10K Sqft Asd.V :$169, 200 Lgl :BLK 22 LOT 9-10 RENTON TOWN OF W Q:SW S:17 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:1 BldgSF:6, 732 Ac: . 09 YB:1910 Ph: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. # 25 . * MetroScan / King : ---- * Owner :Rebecca' s Food Enterprib Inc Parcel # :723150 1875 05 Site :804 S 3Rd St Renton 98055 Sale Date : 06/19/1989 Mail :808 S 3Rd St Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price : $85, 000 Use :425 Pub,Restaurant,Lounges Asd.V :$120,400 Lgl :BLK 22 LOT 9-10 RENTON TOWN OF W Q:SW S:17 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories :1 BldgSF:3, 600 Ac: .09 YB:1927 Ph: # 26 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Rebecca' s Food Enterprises Inc Parcel # :723150 1880 08 Site :810 S 3Rd St Renton 98055 Sale Date :05/28/1992 Mail :808 S 3Rd St Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price . Use :251 Com,Retail Store,Less Than 10K Sqft Asd.V :$127, 700 Lgl :BLK 22 LOT 9-10 RENTON TOWN OF E Q:SW S:17 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories :1 BldgSF:5, 080 Ac: .07 YB:1927 Ph: # 27 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Delancey Robert C & Beverly Parcel # :723150 1900 04 Site :824 S 3Rd St Renton 98055 Sale Date . Mail :8464 Island Dr S Seattle Wa 98118 Sale Price . Use :252 Com,Retail Store, 10K-25K Sqft Asd.V :$291, 900 Lgl :BLK 22 LOT 11 RENTON TOWN OF Q:SW S:17 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories :2 BldgSF:11, 280 Ac: .13 YB:1910 Ph:206-723-8795 # 28 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Delancey Robert C Parcel # :723150 1905 09 Site :S 3Rd St Renton Sale Date :09/19/1983 Mail :8464 Island Dr S Seattle Wa 98118 Sale Price :$56, 500 Use :401 Pub,Parking,Associated Asd.V :$54, 000 Lgl :BLK 22 LOT 12 RENTON TOWN OF Q:SW S:17 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: Ac: .13 YB: Ph:206-723-8795 # 29 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Barei Mrs Umberto Parcel # :723150 1910 02 Site :227 Wells Ave S Renton 98055 Sale Date . Mail :322 S 15Th St Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price . Use :252 Com,Retail Store, l0K-25K Sqft Asd.V :$259, 000 Lgl :BLK 22 LOT 13-14 RENTON TOWN OF Q:SW S:17 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:2 B1dgSF:8, 880 Ac: .27 YB:1924 Ph:425-255-5345 # 30 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Barei Mrs Umberto Parcel # :723150 1910 02 Site :227 Wells Ave S Renton 98055 Sale Date . Mail :322 S 15Th St Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price . Use :252 Com,Retail Store, lOK-25K Sqft Asd.V :$259, 000 Lgl :BLK 22 LOT 13-14 RENTON TOWN OF Q:SW S:17 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:1 BldgSF:1,400 Ac: .27 YB:1955 Ph:425-255-5345 # 31 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Barei Mrs Umberto Parcel # :723150 1910 02 Site :227 Wells Ave S Renton 98055 Sale Date . Mail :322 S 15Th St Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price . Use :252 Com,Retail Store, 10K-25K Sqft Asd.V :$259, 000 Lgl :BLK 22 LOT 13-14 RENTON TOWN OF Q:SW S:17 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:1 B1dgSF:1, 400 Ac: .27 YB:1948 Ph:425-255-5345 # 32 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Cde Partnership Parcel # :723150 1920 00 Site :217 Wells Ave S Renton 98055 Sale Date :07/01/1999 Mail :217 Wells Ave S Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price : $460, 000 Full Use :252 Com,Retail Store, 10K-25K Sqft Asd.V :$294, 100 Lgl :BLK 22 LOT 15-16 RENTON TOWN OF Q:SW S:17 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories :2 BldgSF:13, 005 Ac: .25 YB:1908 Ph: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. # 33 . * MetroScan / King : ---- * Owner :First Federal Savings « ,n Parcel # :723150 1930 08 Site :213 Wells Ave S Renton 98055 Sale Date :08/31/1988 Mail :PO Box 360 Renton Wa 98057 Sale Price :$90, 000 Use :401 Pub, Parking,Associated Asd.V :$51,400 Lgl :BLK 22 LOT 17 RENTON TOWN OF LESS Q:SW S :17 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories : BldgSF: Ac: . 12 YB: Ph: # 34 * MetroScan / King * Owner :First Federal Savings & Loa Parcel # :723150 1935 03 Site :209 Wells Ave S Renton 98055 Sale Date . Mail :PO Box 358 Renton Wa 98057 Sale Price . Use :242 Com,Retail Strip, l0K To 25K Sqft Asd.V :$690, 800 Lgl :BLK 22 LOT 18 RENTON TOWN OF LESS Q:SW S:17 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: .12 YB: Ph: # 35 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Custer C L Parcel # :723150 1940 06 Site :209 Wells Ave S Renton 98055 Sale Date . Mail :PO Box 358 Renton Wa 98057 Sale Price . Use :242 Com,Retail Strip, 10K To 25K Sqft Asd.V :$616, 500 Lgl :BLK 22 LOT 19-20 RENTON TOWN OF Q:SW S:17 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:1 B1dgSF:10, 918 Ac: .25 YB:1968 Ph: # 36 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Belmondo Family Limited Par Parcel # :723150 1970 09 Site :124 Williams Ave S Renton 98055 Sale Date :12/30/1993 Mail :1835 NE 12Th St Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price . Use :251 Com,Retail Store,Less Than 10K Sqft Asd.V :$320,600 Lgl :BLK 23 LOT 5 & 6 RENTON TOWN OF Q:NW S:17 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:1 BldgSF:5, 000 Ac: .24 YB:1967 Ph:425-255-6836 # 37 * MetroScan / King * Owner :U S Bank Of Washington Parcel # :723150 1979 00 Site :820 S 2Nd St Renton 98055 Sale Date . Mail :2800 E Lake St #Lake00 Minneapolis Mn 55406 Sale Price . Use :404 Pub,Bank Asd.V :$1, 082, 000 Lgl :BLK 23 LOT POR RENTON TOWN OF S 10 Q:NW S:17 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories :1 B1dgSF:8, 742 Ac: . 88 YB:1967 Ph: # 38 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Cugini Alex Jr Parcel # :723150 2085 09 Site :710 S 2Nd St Renton 98055 Sale Date :06/10/1986 Mail :611 Renton Ave S Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price . Use :253 Com,Retail Store,25K+ Sqft Asd.V :$1, 783, 800 Lgl :BLK 24 LOT 5 THRU 15 RENTON TOWN Q:NW S:17 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:1 B1dgSF:35, 936 Ac:1.51 YB:1981 Ph:425-255-1281 # 39 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Gavin Roger J Parcel # :723150 2185 08 Site :700 S 3Rd St Renton 98055 Sale Date :04/04/1989 Mail :700 S 3Rd St #896 Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price . Use :411 Pub,Retail,Department Asd.V :$745,300 Lgl :BLK 25 LOT 9-10 RENTON TOWN OF W Q:SE S:18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:2 BldgSF:34, 500 Ac: .26 YB:1955 Ph: # 40 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Kavesh Jerome Alan Et Al Parcel # :723150 2210 07 Site :710 S 3Rd St Renton 98055 Sale Date :03/03/1989 Mail :6526 153Rd Ave SE Bellevue Wa 98006 Sale Price :$245, 000 Use :252 Com,Retail Store, 10K-25K Sqft Asd.V :$365, 500 Lgl :BLK 25 LOT 11-12 RENTON TOWN OF Q:SE S:18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:1 B1dgSF:16,480 Ac: .26 YB:1954 Ph: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. # 41 , * MetroScan / King : ---- * Owner :Ren Four Inc Parcel # :723150 2220 05 Site :227 Williams Ave S Renton 98055 Sale Date . Mail :PO Box 59 Renton Wa 98057 Sale Price . Use :262 Off, l-3 Story, 5K To 15K Sqft Asd.V :$330,400 Lgl :BLK 25 LOT 13 RENTON TOWN OF LESS Q:SE S:18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories :2 BldgSF:8, 807 Ac: .13 YB:1946 Ph: # 42 * MetroScan / King * Owner :U S West Inc Parcel # :723150 2225 00 Site :225 Williams Ave S Renton 98055 Sale Date . Mail :6300 S Syracuse Way #700 Englewood Co 80111 Sale Price . Use :622 Ind,Utilities, Public,Garage/Electri Asd.V . Lgl :BLK 25 LOT 14-15 RENTON TOWN OF Q:SE S:18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:3 BldgSF: 31, 500 Ac: .26 YB:1966 Ph:303-220-7600 # 43 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Us West Inc Parcel # :723150 2245 06 Site :225 Williams Ave S Renton 98055 Sale Date . Mail :6300 S Syracuse Way Englewood Co 80111 Sale Price . Use :622 Ind,Utilities, Public,Garage/Electri Asd.V . Lgl :BLK 25 LOT 16-17 RENTON TOWN OF Q:SE S:18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:2 BldgSF:20, 975 Ac: .26 YB:1981 Ph:303-220-7600 # 44 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Lb Renton Partnership Parcel # :723150 2265 01 Site :201 Williams Ave S Renton 98055 Sale Date :02/20/1996 Mail :212 Wells Ave S #A Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price :$354, 555 Full Use :425 Pub,Restaurant,Lounges Asd.V :$728, 900 Lgl :BLK 25 LOT 1 & 2 & RENTON TOWN OF Q:SE S:18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:1 BldgSF:6, 270 Ac: .48 YB:1960 Ph: # 45 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Bank Of America Nt & Sa Parcel # :723150 2271 03 Site :300 Burnett Ave S Renton 98055 Sale Date . Mail :PO Box 37000 San Francisco Ca 94137 Sale Price . Use :404 Pub,Bank Asd.V :$1, 517, 000 Lgl :BLK 26 LOT 1-6 & 12-15 RENTON TOWN Q:SE S:18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:1 B1dgSF:10,439 Ac:1.25 YB:1981 Ph: # 46 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Renton Commerce Center Llp Parcel # :723150 2370 03 Site :715 S 3Rd St Renton 98055 Sale Date :12/12/1997 Mail :PO Box 1113 Renton Wa 98057 Sale Price :$400, 000 Full Use :252 Com,Retail Store,10K-25K Sqft Asd.V :$405, 500 Lgl :BLK 26 LOT 16-17 RENTON TOWN OF Q:SE S:18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:1 B1dgSF:11, 160 Ac: .27 YB:1928 Ph: # 47 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Good Partnership Parcel # :783930 0230 08 Site :617 S 3Rd St Renton 98055 Sale Date :03/24/1997 Mail :613 S 3Rd St #A Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price :$360, 000 Full Use :251 Com,Retail Store,Less Than 10K Sqft Asd.V :$494, 300 Lgl :BLK 33 LOT 1-2 SMITHERS 1ST ADD TO Q:SE S:18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:1 BldgSF:9, 336 Ac: .24 YB:1942 Ph: # 48 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Good Partnership Parcel # :783930 0240 06 Site :611 S 3Rd St Renton 98055 Sale Date :03/24/1997 Mail :617 S 3Rd St Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price :$360, 000 Full Use :251 Com,Retail Store,Less Than 10K Sqft Asd.V :$203, 000 Lgl :BLK 33 LOT 3-4 SMITHERS 1ST ADD TO Q:SE S :18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories :2 B1dgSF:5, 730 Ac: .22 YB:1923 Ph: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. etroScan / King (WA) • Parcel Number Owner Name Site Address YB Owner Phone 182305 9262 02 Burlington Northrn San S 2 Burnett Renton 569600 0050 07 City Of Renton 233 Burnett Ave S Renton 569600 0055 02 City Of Renton 233 Burnett Ave S Renton 569600 0065 00 City Of Renton 233 Burnett Ave S Renton 569600 0070 03 City Of Renton 233 Burnett Ave S Renton 569600 0075 08 Renton City 233 Burnett Ave S Renton 425-235-2500 569600 0080 01 Renton City 233 Burnett Ave S Renton 569600 0085 06 Yokel Alvin John 204 Logan Ave S Renton 9 569600 0090 09 Williams Thomas H 603 S 2Nd St Renton 9805 1963 253-631-0149 569600 0105 02 City Of Renton 215 Burnett Ave S Renton 1908 569600 0115 00 City Of Renton 219 Burnett Ave S Renton 569600 0120 03 City Of Renton 219 Burnett Ave S Renton 569600 0200 06 Washington Mutual Savg 150 Logan Ave S Renton 9 1968 569600 0210 04 Washington Mutual Savi 150 Logan Ave S Renton 9 569600 0215 09 King Jerry M & Janice 126 Logan Ave S Renton 9 1958 253-630-7933 723150 1755 00 Duff William E 801 S 3Rd St Renton 9805 1964 425-347-7153 723150 1770 01 Imel Kenneth;Templin-I 308 Williams Ave S Rento 1938 723150 1820 01 Porcello Bldg 811 S 3Rd St Renton 9805 1940 723150 1825 06 Super Shops Inc 801 S 2Nd St Renton 9805 1946 723150 1825 06 Super Shops Inc 801 S 2Nd St Renton 9805 1946 723150 1830 09 Super Shops Inc Wells Ave S Renton 723150 1845 02 Rosa James D 208 Williams Ave S Rento 1952 425-255-0831 723150 1850 04 Pham Tuyenl;Nguyen Bao 226 Williams Ave S Rento 1954 425-271-1580 723150 1870 00 Cugini Land & Timber C 800 S 3Rd St Renton 9805 1910 723150 1875 05 Rebecca's Food Enterpr 804 S 3Rd St Renton 9805 1927 723150 1880 08 Rebecca's Food Enterpr 810 S 3Rd St Renton 9805 1927 723150 1900 04 Delancey Robert C & Be 824 S 3Rd St Renton 9805 1910 206-723-8795 723150 1905 09 Delancey Robert C S 3Rd St Renton 206-723-8795 723150 1910 02 Barei Mrs Umberto 227 Wells Ave S Renton 9 1924 425-255-5345 723150 1910 02 Barei Mrs Umberto 227 Wells Ave S Renton 9 1955 425-255-5345 723150 1910 02 Barei Mrs Umberto 227 Wells Ave S Renton 9 1948 425-255-5345 723150 1920 00 Cde Partnership 217 Wells Ave S Renton 9 1908 723150 1930 08 First Federal Savings 213 Wells Ave S Renton 9 723150 1935 03 First Federal Savings 209 Wells Ave S Renton 9 723150 1940 06 Custer C L 209 Wells Ave S Renton 9 1968 723150 1970 09 Belmondo Family Limite 124 Williams Ave S Rento 1967 425-255-6836 723150 1979 00 U S Bank Of Washington 820 S 2Nd St Renton 9805 1967 723150 2085 09 Cugini Alex Jr 710 S 2Nd St Renton 9805 1981 425-255-1281 723150 2185 08 Gavin Roger J 700 S 3Rd St Renton 9805 1955 723150 2210 07 Kavesh Jerome Alan Et 710 S 3Rd St Renton 9805 1954 723150 2220 05 Ren Four Inc 227 Williams Ave S Rento 1946 723150 2225 00 U S West Inc 225 Williams Ave S Rento 1966 303-220-7600 723150 2245 06 Us West Inc 225 Williams Ave S Rento 1981 303-220-7600 723150 2265 01 Lb Renton Partnership 201 Williams Ave S Rento 1960 723150 2271 03 Bank Of America Nt & S 300 Burnett Ave S Renton 1981 723150 2370 03 Renton Commerce Center 715 S 3Rd St Renton 9805 1928 783930 0230 08 Good Partnership 617 S 3Rd St Renton 9805 1942 783930 0240 06 Good Partnership 611 S 3Rd St Renton 9805 1923 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. ODYL% dY Land Use: The project site Is located in the Center Downtown(CD)zone and Center Downtown Comprehensive Plan Map designation.The site is also located inside 4. + the Downtown Core Area. The proposal appears to be consistent woh the r development standards of the CD zone and Comprehensive Plan policies. - Development In the Downtown Core Area is exempt from parking requirements, front/street setback,landscaping,and lot coverage standards of the CD zone. The proposal will be reviewed under the Attached Housing Design Guidelines. NOTICE OF APPLICATION Density: The proposal includes 90 residential units and would have a net density of 93.75 dwelling units per acre.The CD zone allows a residential density range of 25 to AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON- 100 dwelling units per acre. SIGNIFICANCE(DNS) Environmental Documents that Environmental Checklist. Evaluate the Proposed Project: Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: The proposal will be subject to the City's Environmental Ordinance,Zoning DATE: October 22,1999 Code,Subdivision Ordinance,Public Works Standard's,etc. These adopted codes and standards will function to mitigate project impacts. LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-99-141,SA-A,ECF APPLICATION NAME: SHERIDAN MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT Proposed Mitigation Measures Used for Project Mitigation: The Tleasuresaing Mitigation Measures will likely be Imposed on the proposed project. These recommended Mitigation PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Proposal to demolish the existing Good Chevrolet auto service building and construct a project impacts not covered by existing codes and regulations as cited above. 4-story mixed use structure with a basement. The proposed building would contain a Metro park and ride lot with 150 stalls,90 multi-family residential units with 90 stalls of associated parking,and approximately 4,100 sq.S.of commercial 1.Traffic Mitigation Fee-$75.00 per new average daily trip attributed to the proposal, area. 2.Fire Mitigation Fee-$388.00 per new multi-family dwelling unit The upper three levels would be constructed as two separate buildings for the 90 apartment units. Landscaped courtyards are proposed al the first residential level above the fee- parking garage.The residential floors would be accessed 3.Parks Mitigation from three lobbies,two on Bumett Avenue S.and one on S.2".Street. $354.51 per new multifamily dwelling unit. The Metro park and ride would be located at the street and basement levels. Auto access to the parking garage would enter off S.2 Street.The parking garage would have a pedestrian link to the adjacent transit center on Burnett Ave.S. Parking for the residential units would be at the basement level and would be isolated from the Metro parking. Comments on the above application must be submitted In writing to Mr.Peter Rosen,Project Manager,Development The 4,100 sq.ft.of commercial space would be located at the comer of Bumett Avenue S.and S.2n°Street. Services Division,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on November 12,1999. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail,contact Mr.Rosen at the number listed below. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of PROJECT LOCATION: 232 Burnett Avenue South,between 2n°and 3rd record and will be notified of any decision on this project. OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE,MITIGATED(DNS,M):As the Lead Agency,the City of CONTACT PERSON: PETER ROSEN(425)430-7219 Renton has determined that significant environmental Impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore,as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS(M)process to give notice that a DNS-M is likely to be issued.Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M am integrated into !PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION I a single comment period.Them will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated(DNS-M).A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. — ' • __ .-.a PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: September 7,1999 yy pfr 4. ._ •I ik 4. NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: October 22,1999 .`yk}I)' p'aianK .7 �UD�gF1 ae 3� APPLICANT: Daily Homes,Inc.3316 Fuhrnan Ave.E.#100,Seattle,WA 98102 \`,`� Y7 ai1t14/113�I ��F: w's ` '4 `\S LaS[ (It1l1si ,. OWNER: Same as Applicant •�•\b=L e''1�171�i4"5dI1 Lx - 4-iI■ia`' MM �11�I�py �� --.•1,- Permits/Review Requested: Environmental(SEPA)Review,Site Plan Review(Administrative) pp op�Apet�;s� Y.,?;7 a)2 Attached Housing Design Guidelines r1 ��. 51vlp,y1@�a . AllgjSE i`r �-% r,1- `t` �I_ 1,TI���� �r��■�L�`JoaC�1: Other Permits which may be required: Construction and Building Permits C�y ' iiA41� 'I ,..�- 0a�yr Requested Studies: Geolechnical Engineering Study,Preliminary Storm Drainage Report 'MINN 1Pliglill Location where application may f __ i.t ), a t be reviewed: Planning/Building/Publicouth Works Division,Development Services Department. •eiHs!leett ce.vap,I�p •eeer�'aeees -'ap Q'p e111A,' , 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 ��ap[� p�p¢� �yi .;tr�� Iti� • -- PUBLIC HEARING: Not Applicable.Administrative review only. ke9UER-'�1r> a 11'11"•" 851,���� 01111'1! d e��1 !'` '+� aw`ee CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: • ,,J /:' Analyticalrocess 1111111���I�i 4 • - '1, , W\i' •.•• Project consistency refers to whether a project is consistent wily adopted and applicable development regulations,or in , NOW e ■ _a._. .� ,y ,r; their absence,comprehensive plan polices.RCW 38.708.110(2)(g)provides that the Notice of Application(NOA) •G0� �� IRAIAO pO�Iy�/q��l�`®lr�yAlp - e:,,�' /Y.,%'s.N Include a statement of the preliminary determination of a project's consistency with the type of land use,level of lrJk1 ell [1 \H,r development,Infrastructure,and character of development it one has been made at the time of notice.At a minimum, l� �O�Ilaii 4 �\ .:I�tlptlg3 �� k }-AU'� // 1 Xi every NOA shall include a determination of the project's consistency with the zoning,comprehensive plan and ��, { ) 51 ia� T, Lli.. �.& SF".' t i development regulations. _1-'�• ,r d@8 6. z;riff fi il6 `�9 1 + '�r!8�I am,�m,rt anmaaas —' ; .6Y9d`�: • CERTIFICATION c_1) .----7 I, ,t r- \ X-s c 0 v-N , hereb certify that �) copies of the above document were posted by me in conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on 1 6' / - /c1C /4/9 n Signed: L , .a,--N ATTEST: Subcribed and sworn before me, a Nortary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing iif -1, )t A-,^ , on the 4.'t-1., day of '8 U. ]c c!`l MARILYN Kr SMCHEFF —2/Y1 (Y /,___. ierG -v-L rylb*— NOTARY PUBLIC OF WASHINGTON MARILYN KAMCHEFF COMMISSION EXPIRES JUNE 2E), 2003 MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES:6-29-03 "-• . T� �u iR)... NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON- SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) DATE: October 22,1999 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-99-141,SA-A,ECF APPLICATION NAME: SHERIDAN MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Proposal to demolish the existing Good Chevrolet auto service building and construct a 4-story mixed use structure with a basement. The proposed building would contain a Metro park and ride lot with 150 stalls,90 multi-family residential units with 90 stalls of associated parking, and approximately 4,100 sq.ft.of commercial area. The upper three levels would be constructed as two separate buildings for the 90 apartment units. Landscaped C f courtyards are proposed at the first residential level above the parking garage. The residential floors would be accessed 1 from three lobbies,two on Burnett Avenue S.and one on S.2nd Street. The Metro park and ride would be located at the street and basement levels. Auto access to the parking garage would enter off S.2nd Street. The parking garage would have a pedestrian link to the adjacent transit center on Burnett Ave.S. Parking for the residential units would be at the basement level and would be isolated from the Metro parking. The 4,100 sq.ft.of commercial space would be located at the corner of Burnett Avenue S.and S.2nd Street. PROJECT LOCATION: 232 Burnett Avenue South,between 2nd and 3rd OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE,MITIGATED(DNS,M): As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore,as permitted under the RCW 43.21 C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS(M)process to give notice that a DNS-M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated(DNS-M). A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: September 7, 1999 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: October 22, 1999 APPLICANT: Daily Homes, Inc.3316 Fuhrman Ave.E.#100,Seattle,WA 98102 OWNER: Same as Applicant Permits/Review Requested: Environmental(SEPA)Review,Site Plan Review(Administrative) Attached Housing Design Guidelines Other Permits which may be required: Construction and Building Permits Requested Studies: Geotechnical Engineering Study,Preliminary Storm Drainage Report Location where application may be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 PUBLIC HEARING: Not Applicable. Administrative review only. CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Analytical process Project consistency refers to whether a project is consistent with adopted and applicable development regulations,or in their absence,comprehensive plan policies. RCW 36.70B.110(2)(g)provides that the Notice of Application(NOA) include a statement of the preliminary determination of a project's consistency with the type of land use,level of development,infrastructure,and character of development if one has been made at the time of notice. At a minimum, every NOA shall include a determination of the project's consistency with the zoning,comprehensive plan and development regulations. genmailout Land Use: The project site is located in the Center Downtown (CD) zone and Center Downtown Comprehensive Plan Map designation. The site is also located inside the Downtown Core Area. The proposal appears to be consistent with the development standards of the CD zone and Comprehensive Plan policies. Development in the Downtown Core Area is exempt from parking requirements, front/street setback,landscaping,and lot coverage standards of the CD zone. The proposal will be reviewed under the Attached Housing Design Guidelines. Density: The proposal includes 90 residential units and would have a net density of 93.75 dwelling units per acre. The CD zone allows a residential density range of 25 to 100 dwelling units per acre. Environmental Documents that Environmental Checklist. Evaluate the Proposed Project: Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: The proposal will be subject to the City's Environmental Ordinance, Zoning Code, Subdivision Ordinance, Public Works Standard's, etc. These adopted codes and standards will function to mitigate project impacts. Proposed Mitigation Measures Used for Project Mitigation: The following Mitigation Measures will likely be imposed on the proposed project. These recommended Mitigation Measures address project impacts not covered by existing codes and regulations as cited above. 1.Traffic Mitigation Fee-$75.00 per new average daily trip attributed to the proposal. 2.Fire Mitigation Fee-$388.00 per new multi-family dwelling unit. 3.Parks Mitigation fee-$354.51 per new multi-family dwelling unit. Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Mr. Peter Rosen, Project Manager, Development Services Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055, by 5:00 PM on November 12, 1999. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact Mr. Rosen at the number listed below. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: PETER ROSEN (425)430-7219 PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION '‘‘:.\IP.'::-4--.'/4e.1____INE5,11 La ins it •••••`. co ;:'' -'.. --1.w la iltlhg --I ' - I rii S�t ` lii , a cy"r. '�+�`�c+ •. L ' p t` � 1kin I!1 '!L � '' A "* It Mkgging �*` i �bt,I.l . �4�� �.0' I ti� �FR�EN�TON 8`'°° .1 -�---� .` L � p Its -1 Mit ' r 014 .' , 1 NI,i_L__.,.... .. 1., ._,,t, , ., /.7,./ genmaibut �i ; ?az j �C '\ ®�� p �� ! t ;• 47, CITX OF RENTON .111' Planning/Building/Public Works Department MIMED Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator October 22, 1999 Mr. Charles Laboda Daily Homes, Inc. 3316 Fuhrman Avenue East#100 Seattle, WA 98102 SUBJECT: Sheridan Mixed Use Development Project No. LUA-99-141,Sa-A,ECF Dear Mr. Laboda: The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on November 23, 1999. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. Please contact me, at (425) 430-7219, if you have any questions. Sincerely, 6)(1.. Peter Rosen Project Manager 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, Washington 98055 ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer : CITY OF'RENTO.I4 : : : . V€LOPMENT S VIGiw DIV SIGN D U PERMIT : 1.:.,im,ui:,•in1; :z. :;iin. m:;n1.1i,:!iim•!iimii,.fifiA:sT.ER''''''APPL.IcAT I N'. -....... .....-........-*. •••• :' - - :-:' - .. .. . .. .. ............ ........... . . ....... . ......... ...... ........ ....... . . . • PROPERTY OWNERS) _ pFtt7:JECT iNFOR1VlATON Note: if there is more than one fags& owner, please attach er additional notarized Master Application far<eacft owner. r '' PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME:� g NAME: palvirr Shericidl. M ced UJ(/ 100 PROPERTY/PROJECT A�DD-RESS�(S))/LLOCATION: ADDRESS: / 31 (/tkrr4ivtln !, E' g32` OUVr✓�et( r `vs .b e -N CITY: ZIP: KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): Y� lr )�k g61a� � 31� 2 ss-a� �Z31s� 1. TELEPHONE NUMBER: EX(7S�NSG11 ND US S)•.�a DS- • (gt(,). 3 7 (.7 ....,,,,-....:..............-.:.:. V -ow r v►v s h y h .APPLICANT (, other than ownerY:i: .. ::<> : 5-h01d 1 / 7 i'7.� L.h-' C. PROPOSED LAND USES: go NAME: �'�'`�� �,( _ 3-Mrabe. COMPANY (if applicable): EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: 017 ADDRESS: OEVEL� OC•" T U i� for q3s- PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE P ENT ppplicable). NtN for SEP 0 1999 CITY:R 2,. t - 1 ZIP: 9,05 7 EXISTING ZONING: . P RECEIVED TELEPHONE NUMBER: 20o �3 f PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): ..:.. .. .COINTACT PERSON::. G-j-� . ...,..:.....:,:.....:............................................................. ......................................................... +•a��.F.���°�� SITE AREA(SQ. FT. OR ACREAGE): a NAME:.• ♦ 9/)' • bpct / .f .:/tcs.t . La 4,z, Oce I <sE. : ....„ . _ ., . .,, 4c.s, .,.. . . • . . . COIGIP.�I lY (if appli.aa'ble):t PROJECT VALUU�E,::7 134,k.ilic.it_sa r 6. 0 c„, v, ) • ADDRESS'• ZAw °.1' �31 � ���r(n^�N f\--lt E 'l: " �� IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? CITY. .7e6I1...c [,.J tirz,,: 7gI( v ... IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA? TELEPHONE UMBER: Ki' 2-b-(A3g\ - 3--/ -)0 )(-a ( f LEGAL DESCRI; DN OF PROPERTY ;(Attach sepal sheet if necessary) > . , k /4-4-1-°t6L'el _ . • • TYPE;OF APPLICATION & FEES Check ail application types teat apply City staff will determine fees _ANNEXATION $ SUBDIVISION: _ COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT $ _ REZONE $ _ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ _SPECIAL PERMIT $ _ SHORT PLAT $ _TEMPORARY PERMIT $ _TENTATIVE PLAT $ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ _ PRELIMINARY PLAT $ SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ /Opp.e9t _ FINAL PLAT $ _GRADE & FILL PERMIT $ (NO. CU. YDS: ) PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ _VARIANCE . $ (FROM SECTION: ) _ PRELIMINARY _WAIVER $ _ FINAL _WETLAND PERMIT $ ROUTINE VEGETATION — MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ _ BINDING SITE PLAN $ SHORELINE REVIEWS: _ SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ _ CONDITIONAL USE $ _ VARIANCE $ — EXEMPTION $No Charoe X ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ 5'G0.06 REVISION $ AFFIDAVIT 0'.F OWNERSHIP- I, (Print Name)Ci 1Ar 11e L46j<uieclare that I am (please check one)_the owner of the property involved in this application, the authorized representative to act for the property owner(please attach proof of authorization), and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. - �%**Z E N. ✓•••••� A 4 / (r� . f ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before� •Nd I( / �` for the State of L'-' 4:SYhr-+-Aireciding,at • `_. • to .. e of Owner/R=.resenta •.e) 5-e<= 1c._ ' ,on the ly ita�i. 0 R • ()abbe( 19 t : 1 ..• _ i a 4' A.. _1 Ain i " - (SFen.ture of Ow_ :•resentative) 0 /5-C-X +tt`0 .t.:i?r••�\7.+•,• (Signature of Notary Public) ••.•F WAg,••• (T)is section to be completed by City Staff ) City.File Number ., -' A AAD BSP CAPS CAP U CPA CU A CU.-H ECF LA MHP.. .FPUD FP PP R RVMP S ..A SA H SHPL A SHPL H SP SM SM>T. .TP V A V H W`. TOTAL;.FEES....S: .. TOTAL P:O.STAGE:PROVIDEID :.$::f. .... ::..::<>;:: > : ;;:: >;: :::: :: : MASTERAP.DOC REVISED 8/97 ��0 33 EXHIBIT A Legal Description of Premises The West 75 feet of Lots 1 and 2, and Lots 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8, Block 25, according to the plat of the Town of Renton recorded in Volume 1 of Plats, page 135, records of King County, Washington; Except the East 5 feet of Lots 3 through 8 for alley deeded to the City of Renton under Recording No. 4332679. REAL ESTATE PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT PAGE 1 [23538-00021BA990350.075) 5/3/99 4:33 PM OCT-I_7-:I.999 il71:G1_ FPOf9 D&11,_, Homes Iric T-i 252?52017 P.OD QCT d 199g 25 57 I ❑F RENT N .1 ,3p r i P.E'2 4 ' _ Q t1=, - a.P .•rt,y� n:r • d S.- l•+�v . f-: a�y1� `I nF '' r s.{y' t s,. - a r ' f'', i C, M ,c Air ti 3'w r t.i s r€ g. 3. u w�,.. ,,�, �i i{,ilc�z •C,,��i i al l 'r"� 'tY �. L+.0 `�' ;r e w !N � ..�... i,'"i'LL i b `.s�" 1,......V'-',.e, ), 41" r 'i , C yin lo�" -k . ,, , 't 8r , , .,-:",.'1;'‘ I L��w S 7 V'; 1 r �� 1 �i 't y,y&�. is ( d, „r. Iy, .f p'p�{! '''`NO w. e "' +•' t2;!' 1$� ` i ' g 'd M�! '1' 11 3- r 2 4' Hu �7 t,A: 4 t.iG, . i, ,2) k yY•ro,N�, H ' m .I 9 'w 1 ,d" �,,, � � J R j,.• in, A.. ft i !F i�+ ••41.:r 1 2 T'`yf.,..4, G .i..<. klt. ) p �,�`•--• '1� . . k Imel: Crks` �• ,. 'M., {A,,, „,gy • j a Jkiii1.4, 0 ,, .4 -ri' y�1PIT- jty,'H , sy5 :"1"tl _ }••"f.'O ,11 -it". .. 1,. l ,0'-•,.��'e-' a• � ' .:, r": ° ." ' ,"" °' :lr ` 1* � PRa.IECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: NA 6 1ericlm Mixed Use.- ' t1°P1 - I-I E v2-( D A r..7 ?2Up(R-T,0 S ; PROPERTY/PROJECT AdDaE61sss3/f+OCATIONs ADDRESS: . 0 e. 14iwrr1 e f' .5 be{i /e r~i''`4 KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NU MEER 011: CITY 9P: °/ g o S 7 1,23 ts-0 -2140- C7 2_ �j�t,4�1��Dp' #e' -o TELEPHONE NUMEEM: p tINIkTia llSt/70-V 4 C g 3 5 �O O ° VoicaritGf ti"" , 'J ki"DW rt0" �s '1 D I NAME: Ina.r t I e.. L-a ai • . V i' PROPOSED WVD UBI S: go 0i t f+v+sn-c.s - II ��? I xty.J 4) ` di)• comport III icsb*v)! E;KNTINO COMPREHENRIVE PLAN MAR DESIGNATION; O/\ '1,U( t 1 J V '-- IVI C. cep AnDalsal 0 a •- PaOPOSED COMPREHEN$IVSP 1' . i egeig Pfli.ahi.l: 3) Le FkAry:tvrvia,k, /hit, F- tt- 200 WA- SEP 0 7 199: CITY: ZIP• EXISTING ZONINCt • ( .t �r ��1d, 60 RECEIVED Ti i NONE NUMBER: ' 0( 9 3 2 - 3~1- 0 PROPOSED ZONING Of opP>icoblaf: ..• yyI� '$7 ++Y� y�t�yib FI pM ..• 'y"'•�r, 1 SITE AREA MO-FT.CFI ACREAGc"I; C/7 . F Air,. NAME.0'y •14 aii:r r• !,, p F ti YJ } P OCr 1 R STD NG coil Y,(if ap4T 1.h; . .• 'ROJDCi`VALUE: RC 199 oJa rtt?..• I CR11CVlCta3 iVF• >;a�'AW ,•,, ACDR �w 13 THE$ITi LOCATED IN THE RCIUIFER PROTECTION AREA? -- }�1/01(erg l� 'QC • hi 0 CITY- e, t + ._- _-.416/1 - IS se,THE srrelR ACTED iN ANY OTHER rYPp of MEN1' ENViRforiALLY TEIEPI ZONE MSER: ! - V _ Or:T-13-1999 1 :0? FRL!I`1 iii,1 1i_r Hnr,rs In- TCi 42523F2L117 F.it i Of T 12-199e 1- 58 1MA ,•WMv: ,.• - ' .4... .-_._. RIFT sec or'acA • ..,_ tt iliy� P.�Y:!t i5"h }L t'T�g�/ i,rA it >. --:-. gf v• n f ik' r't , *7` ,1" ifitd�.',,x J1'i ir F r IP'S s ��'rq^}} df _ x P'Al_ `` C s , ''•, �P y s2i'1 p• A !/Hill , ANNEXATION - SUBDIVISION; �_COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT $�•�_y —REZONE $ l LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT _SPECIAL.PERMIT $_,____� _SHORT PLAT TEMPORARY PERMIT $_. ,,,_TENTATIVE PLAT ✓_CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ PR8.1MINARY PIA- SITE PLAN APPROVAL $� ! r*jNAL PLAT $ GRADE&FILL PERMIT s � `- — (NO. CU.YDS; ) PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $_„_,._._ —VARIANCE $._.-- (FROM SECTION; ) PRELIMINARY —WAIVER 3 _FINAL WETLAND PERMIT _ $_. -- �_ROUTINE VEGETATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: M,_ MANAGEMENT PERMIT $— _BINDING SITE PLAN $ SFIORELINE REVIEWS. SUBSTANTIAL 9 _"CONDITIONAL USE $ VARIANCE $ r'"~ ..,_ � EXEMPTION ONO C IICIIC ENVIFCNMENTAL REVIEW $ —REVISION $- ---- _- --- z. 7-43ti,aj �...� '. ,`d. ",'i tP 6 dip ' d�k�.N .. ,M.. •— hn 4 ik ..`' � . .a L - 4. ,ry•;11 .A i, iAleW. '.ker� 4 I,IFtint Netttei ,declare that I am Weise Check ono the owns at the property Involved in tr?ie alpoI cetivn,__the nuThoriard repr e* tetive to ect for the p'aparty OW,for tales*. moth proof of ai orizntlon),and that tM tamping staterrknte end'enermrin herein contained and the ia+famnett!on herewith submitted ere in ell rerpeete tnio and cerraCt t5 the beset of any Fngwledge end belie!,`,��te+, 1 H S p', .,,,.1,,,,. 0 % /��" ATrEsT: subecrl end sv:an to before me I)FrY Star +rle, e-e-t�u f-<<-ee-- w ��r7vv' f` the.$1,sta of residing at : M 'WI741� t� ;rt = L o Ovvrtar/Aepi•esentative) 0 �II.o I ,a the,(,3_d y� `�41+. " V :y N....,.. =.4 +t�i"10ti4IbIt (Signature o' Owner/I�iepresentativel :�...•••��', (St ure of NO. Public) `, I' Y dot 0 p 1:, At 'dY`t��`�o`%.` t,, ', .e..-7 S:S.. ,, MZlti •.,a,, .44,40 Z , _ iA ,�+r,4 Yi 3, , x y,,.,`r f v , .1/M�•• n 8 Yr""'4 y, 'M�tlt« ; f L n�r� , *t' - _ur , 3,Akat , tat l ^v. , +: A fS. 3 y, r { ,, grant ,1 1fitW t , t" - ;.die k ;r714.4,-.44,11tZ,i't :y, 1, n6 F 1' S n .� i,` -f,,rt+k, 1Ci S` '` k t+a a !, ._ _. ts`V + U-.. 11y, kxI -dr ' t'� ▪• IMMSlEMP.DOC 1SE0 tUB7 - TIT•PL ,',a TOTAL P,03 October 14, 1999 Construction Mitigation Description Sheridan Mixed Use Project 232 Burnett Avenue South Renton, WA The construction of the two level parking structure with three levels of wood framed construction is scheduled to start Mid March 2000. The anticipated schedule length is 14 months. Hours of construction activity are regulated by the City, but typically 7am—6 pm Monday thru Saturday. Hauling routes will be approved by the City of Renton, but anticipated loading trucks on Burnett,to 2nd,to Rainier to 405. Measures to minimize dust,traffic impacts, erosion,mud, noise and other noxious characteristics will be typical of this type of construction. The site will have a silt fence around the perimeter,but because the site will be excavated, it is unlikely that any dirty water will leave the site. Mud left on the street will be cleaned up immediately, and the street cleaned by street sweeper as needed. All construction equipment will be properly muffled to keep noise to a minimum. Traffic will be controlled using licensed flaggers and proper signage as needed. Please contact me if you have any questions. Charlie Laboda Vice President DEVELOPMENT PLANNING Dally Homes Inc. CITY OF RENTON (206)328-3770x211 OCT 15 1999 RECEIVED THOMASAHARKEY h i October 6, 1999 oLCPti1ENJ- Cl�T CF REN QNNING SEP 0 , 1999 RECEIVE Development Services Division D 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Re: Project Narrative for Site Plan Approval Submittal for Sheridan Mixed Use Building 13400 Northup Way Suite 30 PROJECT LOCATION / EXISTING CONDITIONS Bellevue,WA 98005 The proposed Sheridan Mixed Use Building is located at 232 Burnett Ave. S. The T 425.401.6828 project site is bounded by Burnett Avenue South on the west, by South Second Street on the north, by an alley on the east and by the American Drapery building to F 425.401.0630 the South. The site is the old Good Chevrolet site in downtown Renton in the Commercial Downtown zone (CD). All parcels adjacent to the site are also in the CD zone. The site is approximately 42,000sf. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The project will include the demolition of the Good Chevrolet building on the site and the construction of a four story mixed use structure with a basement. The building will contain a metro park and ride containing 150 stalls, 90 residential units with associated parking of 90 stalls and approximately 4100sf of commercial area. PARKING Metro Parking will be provided at the street level and in the basement. The parking will have a pedestrian link to the adjacent transit center. Traffic to the parking garage will enter off Second Street. The basement will contain the residential parking which will be isolated from the metro parking. COMMERCIAL The 4100sf of commercial space will be provided at the corner of Burnett and Second with entries off Burnett, The exact use of this space has yet to be determined. 99017_corresp_consult_juris_10-6-99siteplan.doc RESIDENTIAL The upper three levels will be developed as two separate buildings and will contain exclusively residential uses with a total of 90 apartment units. These units are flats ranging in size from 525sf studios to 978sf two bedroom two bath units. The majority of the units will be one bedroom one bath. Landscaped courtyards are proposed at the first residential level above the parking garage with cantilevers into the Burnett and Second Street right of ways in order to help modulate the building and provide separation between the residential use and the bus traffic below. The residential floors will be accessed from three lobbies. Two on Burnett and one on Second Street. STREET IMPROVEMENTS Street improvements along Burnett Avenue South will be coordinated with Merritt and Pardini's plan for the adjacent Metro transit center STATISTICS Total lot coverage at grade: 98.9% Total area of parking 77,000sf Total area of commercial 4100sf Total area of residential 83,000sf Estimated Construction Cost $6,900,000. Estimated Fair Market Value $12,000,000. Estimated Quantity of Excavation 14,000cy Average height of building at parapet 46' Sin erely, 7Kent Smutn Project Manager 99017_corresp_consult_juris_10-6-99siteplan.doc THOMASAHARKEY Architects DEVELOPMENT PLANNING October 8, 1999 CITY OF RENTON OCT 15 1999 RECEIVED Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Re: Response to Attached Housing Design Guidelines The following is a summary of the Renton Attached Housing Design Guidelines 13400 Northup Way with respective responses as relate to the proposed design: Suite 30 Bellevue,WA A. BUILDING SITING AND DESIGN 98005 1. Pedestrian Building Entries: T 425.401.6828 This standard requires buildings to be orientated to the street with the primary F 425.401.0630 building entrance prominently located on the facade facing the street. This is a mixed-use project with three uses, Metro Park and Ride, residential and commercial The entries for each of these uses faces Burnett, the primary street that the project faces. Each of the entries is identified with a canopy and unique,prominent architectural treatment to the elevation at that location. The park and ride and residential entries are each marked with a tower and the commercial entry is emphasized with storefront glazing. The entry to parking is located of 2'd away from the pedestrian entries on Burnett. 2. Transition to Surrounding Development: Careful siting and design treatment is necessary to achieve a compatible transition where new buildings differ from surrounding development in terms of building height, bulk and scale. The proposed development holds the street edge much as the existing building does now. The current building on the site is one story and the adjacent building on the block is two stories. The proposed building is 4 stories, with a maximum height of 50'. This is much lower than the 95'height limit allowed for this site. In addition the apparent bulk of the project is reduced by breaking the building into two distinct buildings above the first level Levels 2 through 4 are also set back from the street and further modulated with recesses for decks. 99017-Corr_Consult_10-8-99siteplan B. PARKING,ACCESS, CIRCULATION 1. Location of Parking: No parking shall be located between a building and the front property line or the street side yard of a corner lot. The proposed building is built to the property line or to within 3'of it on both Burnett Avenue and South 2'd Street. All parking is contained within the building. 2. Design of Surface Parking: NA 3. Structure/Garage Parking: Parking entries should not subordinate pedestrian entries and should not dominate the streetscape. Parking at grade shall be completely enclosed within the building or wholly screened. Parking garages should be architecturally compatible with the residential portion of the building. Garage parking should be secured. The street side of parking in the CD zone should incorporate retail or service commercial, facilities that can be used by the residents or units that have access from the street. The parking garage entry to the project is located away from both Burnnett and the commercial space that fronts on the intersection of Burnett and 2'd thus making it subordinate from the primary pedestrian entries to the project. The parking at grade is enclosed with openings that are infilled with a screen pattern that will be similar to the residential window pattern above. Most of the parking provided is for the Metro Park and Ride and needs to remain open to be accessed by the public. The residential parking is separated from the Metro parking by a secured fence and gate. The parking at grade does incorporate space that will be used as retail or service commercial at the corner of Burnett and 24 . 4. Vehicular Access: Parking garages should be accessed from side streets. Driveways should be located to be visible from the right of way and not impede pedestrian circulation. Minimize the number of driveways and curb-cuts. The only parking garage entry is located on the secondary street for this project, South 2"d Street. The entry is directly off 2'd making it directly visible from the street. The parking garage entry location will not impede the primary pedestrian circulation, which will be on Burnett. 99017-Con_Consult_10-8-99siteplan 5: Pedestrian Circulation: Developments should include an integrated pedestrian circulation system that connects buildings, open space, and parking areas with the adjacent street sidewalk system. Pedestrian pathways should be delineated separate from vehicle circulation. The entries to the proposed building are located at the properly lines therefore the project utilizes the adjacent right of ways for pedestrian circulation. There are no pedestrian pathways that intersect vehicle circulation on the site. C. OPEN SPACE 1. Common Open Space Attached housing developments of 10 or more dwelling units shall provide a minimum area of common open space or recreation area equal to 50 square feet per unit. This project consists of 90 dwelling units, which would require 4500 f open space. The proposed project provides 5200 f of open space. Areas provided include an exercise room, a conference center available to all residents and several common courtyards located at the first residential level All of the courtyards have either western or eastern exposure and are surrounded by units thus providing surveillance to the open space. At one level above the street the courtyards are located away from all vehicular hazards. D. BUILDING ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN 1. Building Character and Massing All building facades shall include modulation or articulation at intervals of no more than 40'. The proposed building utilizes a variety of modulation and articulation. At the street level the building follows the front property line with a step back of 3' at several locations. A variety of finish materials as well as canopies that project over the cry sidewalk are used on the street front elevations. In addition the courtyard at the R1 level cantilevers over the public right of way to further break up the street elevations. Walls at the garage area along Burnett are broken up with openings, which contain screen material that is further broken down by steel members, which take on the pattern of the residential windows above. Above the street level the building is modulated such that there are no elevations longer than 40'on the street sides. 99017-Corr_Consult_10-S-99siteplan 2. Building Rooflines Building rooflines should be varied by emphasizing dormers, chimneys, stepped roofs,gables, prominent cornice or fascia, or a broken or articulated roofline. The roof on this building is broken up by clerestory dormers, which provide vaulted ceilings in the living areas of the top floor units. The building roof is further modulated with tower forms at both the main residential and Metro Park and Ride entries. 3. Building Materials: Building exterior finishes should be durable, of high quality, easily maintained and add visual interest and detail. The base of the building is faced with durable materials, brick, stone and concrete. The upper portions of the building use "lighter"appearing materials, vinyl siding, stucco and metal siding. Sincerely, MS Kent mutn Project Manager 99017-Coa_Consult_10-8-99siteplan G E O T E C H July 2, 1999 CONSULTANTS, INC. 13256 NE 20th Street, Suite 16 JN 99212 Bellevue,WA 98005 (425)747-5618 6%1/ FAX (425)747-8561 oA F c/"GFRFN CNN Daily Homes, Inc. Sep ,7 7bN Ns 3316 Fuhrman Avenue East, Suite 100 /� 1999 Seattle, Washington C��I/ Attention: Charles Laboda �Q Subject: Transmittal Letter— Geotechnical Engineering Study Proposed Mixed-Use Building 232 Burnett Avenue South Renton, Washington Dear Mr. Laboda: We are pleased to present this geotechnical engineering report for the mixed-use building to be constructed at 232 Burnett Avenue South in Renton, Washington. The scope of our work consisted of exploring site surface and subsurface conditions, and then developing this report to provide recommendations for general earthwork and design criteria for foundations, retaining walls, and temporary shoring. This work was authorized by your acceptance of our proposal dated June 10, 1999. The subsurface conditions of the building site were explored with four test borings within the footprint of the proposed structure. The northern borings encountered medium-dense to dense, gravelly sand at a relatively shallow depth. The southern borings encountered loose sands to a depth of about 20 feet, overlying medium-dense to dense sands. Groundwater seepage was encountered at a depth of 19 feet. The proposed building could be supported on conventional spread footings on the northern portion of the site, however, it will require piers for the southern portion. The transition between the two foundation types will not be fully known until the excavation of the site occurs. Therefore, the plans should include provisions for both types of foundation systems. Temporary cantilevered shoring will probably be necessary on all sides of the excavation. The perimeter shoring could be used to support the exterior building walls, eliminating some piers in the southern portion of the structure. This would also reduce the potential for noticeable differential settlement in the perimeter walls. The temporary shoring along the southern building line may need to underpin the adjacent structure if it is found to be supported on a conventional foundation system. 411 I ti; Daily Homes, Inc. JN 99212 July 2, 1999 Transmittal Letter— Page 2 The attached report contains a discussion of the study and our recommendations. Please contact us if there are any questions regarding this report, or if we can be of further assistance during the design and construction phases of this project. Respectfully submitted, GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Ltd Marc R. McGinnis, P.E. Associate SES/MRM: alt GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. • • GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Proposed Mixed Use Building 232 Burnett Avenue South Renton, Washington This report presents the findings and recommendations of our geotechnical engineering study for the site of the proposed mixed use building in Renton, Washington. The Vicinity Map, Plate 1, illustrates the general location of the site. The development is currently in the early phases of design. We were provided with a site plan and a layout of the first three levels of the development. Based on these plans and conversations with Charlie Laboda of Daily Homes, Inc., we anticipate that the development will consist of one level of subsurface parking below a level of parking and commercial space at approximately the current grade. Above this mixed-use level will be three floors of residential space. SITE CONDITIONS SURFACE CONDITIONS The property consists of two rectangles and is located on the southeastern corner of the intersection of 2nd Street South and Burnett Avenue South. The site is approximately 46,000 square feet in size and is flat. Currently the lot is developed with two structures thaf are separated by a covered drive connecting Burnett Avenue South and the adjacent eastern alley. These buildings are of masonry construction and were used in the past as a body shop and service center for automobiles. Based on the observed signs of settlement cracking in the walls, these buildings are anticipated to be supported on conventional footings. Immediately to the south of the site is a two-story masonry building. The surrounding sidewalks and the east alley have settled relative to the foundations of this building. Also, it appears that the structure on the subject site has dropped relative to the wall of this adjacent building. It is therefore likely that the south building is supported on deep foundations. Across the alley to the east is a two-story building occupied by US West. East of the northern end of the site is a paved parking lot used by a small restaurant situated farther to the east, across the alley. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS The subsurface conditions were explored by four drilling test borings at the approximate locations shown on the Site Exploration Plan, Plate 2. The additional explorations shown on this plan were geo-probes completed for our environmental study. The results of these environmental explorations are summarized in a separate report. The field exploration program was based upon the proposed construction and required design criteria, access, the subsurface conditions revealed during drilling, and the scope of work outlined in our proposal. The borings were drilled on June 17 and 18, 1999, using a hollow-stem auger drill designed for use in low headroom situations. Samples were taken at 5-foot intervals with a standard penetration sampler. This split-spoon sampler, which has a 2-inch outside diameter, is driven into the soil with rcn rtru r.nniCt II TANTC IN(: Daily Homes Inc. JN 99212 July 2, 1999 Page 2 • a 140-pound hammer falling 30 inches. The number of blows required to advance the sampler a given distance is an indication of the soil density or consistency. A geotechnical engineer from our _ staff observed the drilling process, logged the test borings, and obtained representative samples of the soil encountered. The Test Boring Logs are attached as Plates 3 through 6. Beneath the concrete floor slab of the existing building, the northern borings (B-1 and B-2) encountered medium-dense to dense, gravelly sand at a relatively shallow depth. This competent, granular soil extended to the bottom of both borings. The southern two borings revealed loose sands to a depth of about 10 feet. Beneath this was a loose, silty sand that contained thin silt layers. Medium-dense to dense sands were not encountered until a depth of approximately 20 feet in these borings. The soils encountered in the borings are alluvial deposits laid down by rivers and streams that have meandered through the Renton Valley following recession of the last glaciers. The denser sands encountered near the ground surface in the north borings and below a depth of 20 feet in the south borings have been deposited by more rapidly flowing water. Logs are occasionally found in these alluvial soils, as exhibited by Boring 3. The final logs represent our interpretations of the field logs and laboratory tests. The stratification lines on the logs represent the approximate boundaries between soil types at the exploration locations. The actual transition between soil types may be gradual, and subsurface conditions can vary between exploration locations. The logs provide specific subsurface information only at the locations tested. If a transition in soil type occurred between samples in the borings, the depth of the transition was interpreted. The relative densities and moisture descriptions indicated on the test boring logs are interpretive descriptions based on the conditions observed during drilling. Groundwater Groundwater seepage was observed at a depth of 19 feet in three of the borings. The test borings were left open for only a short time period. Therefore, the seepage levels on the logs may not accurately indicate the static groundwater level. However, the current level of the regional water table is likely near the 19-foot depth of observed seepage. It should be noted that groundwater levels vary seasonally with rainfall and other factors. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS GENERAL Based on the information from our borings, the construction of the proposed building is, in our opinion, feasible from a geotechnical engineering standpoint. However, due to the variable subsurface conditions, the building may need to rest on two types of foundations. The building could be supported on conventional spread footings on the northern portion of the site, but will require a deep foundation system for the southern portion. Considering the soil and groundwater conditions, and the proximity of buildings that are probably supported on conventional footing, we recommend that augercast concrete piers be used as the deep foundation system. These piers would be embedded into the medium-dense to dense sands. The transition between the two foundation types will not be fully known until the site excavation occurs. Therefore, the structural plans should include details for both types of foundation systems. GFOTFCH CONSULTANTS.INC. Daily Homes Inc. JN 99212 July 2, 1999 Page 3 • The proposed structure will utilize one level of subsurface parking. This will require approximately 10 feet of material to be removed from the footprint of the building. Temporary shoring will likely be needed around the majority of the excavation. An inclination of 1:1 (Horizontal:Vertical) is the maximum recommended for temporary slopes above the groundwater at the subject site. Where this cut cannot be made within property lines or if temporary excavation easements cannot be obtained, shoring will be required. Surcharge loads may need to be applied due to the adjacent structures to the south and east. However, if the adjacent structure to the south utilizes a deep foundation system, this may not be necessary. During design of the shoring system, the foundation for these adjacent buildings should be determined. Surcharges from adjacent structures and streets must also be incorporated into the design of the permanent building wall. The exterior walls of the structure could be hung on the shoring piles. This serves two purposes: 1) it would eliminate some of the augercast piers in the southern portion of the building, and 2) the use of the same foundation system to support the entire perimeter wall reduces the potential for noticeable differential settlement along the walls. If this system is utilized, the vertical loads from the building would need to be incorporated into the shoring design. The garage floor can be supported on the native sands. Where the slab rests on the looser soils in the southern portion, some slight settlement relative to the foundation walls may become apparent over time. If this is not acceptable, the slab should be supported on the piers. On-grade slabs in the south end of the building should be reinforced with rebar if they are not carried on the foundation system. This reduces the potential for large cracks when differential settlement occurs. Regardless of the measures taken to reduce ground vibrations and to limit the size of the excavation, with an excavation of this size there is always some risk of causing settlement in adjacent, conventionally supported buildings and on-grade elements. In order to protect against unsubstantiated damage claims from neighboring property owners, we recommend the following: • Complete a thorough documentation of the condition of surrounding buildings, pavements and sidewalks prior to beginning demolition activities. • Install benchmarks on neighboring buildings to monitor them for settlement. These benchmarks should be placed and initially surveyed before building demolition starts. • Caution the demolition contractor to minimize strong impacts, such as breaking up large pieces of concrete by dropping them or striking them with the excavator bucket, wherever possible. • Monitor the shoring walls for movement as soon as the soldier piles are in place. Geotech Consultants, Inc. should be allowed to review the final development plans to verify that the recommendations presented in this report are adequately addressed in the design. Such a plan review would be additional work beyond the current scope of work for this study, and it may include revisions to our recommendations to accommodate site, development, and geotechnical constraints that become more evident during the review process. CONVENTIONAL FOUNDATIONS The northern portion of the structure can be supported using conventional continuous and spread footings bearing on undisturbed, medium-dense to dense gravelly sands, or on structural fill placed GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Daily Homes Inc. JN 99212 July 2, 1999 Page 4 above this competent, native soil. See the later sub-section entitled GENERAL EARTHWORK AND STRUCTURAL FILL for recommendations regarding the placement and compaction of structural fill beneath structures. We recommend that continuous and individual spread footings have minimum widths of 16 and 24 inches, respectively. They should be bottomed at least 18 inches below the lowest adjacent finish ground surface. The local building codes should be reviewed to determine if different footing widths or embedment depths are required. Footing subgrades must be cleaned of loose or disturbed soil prior to pouring concrete. Depending upon site and equipment constraints, this may require removing the disturbed soil by hand. Some overexcavation may be required below footings to expose competent, native soil. Unless lean concrete is used to fill an overexcavated hole, the overexcavation must be at least as wide at the bottom as the sum of the depth of the overexcavation and the footing width. For example, an overexcavation extending 2 feet below the bottom of a 3-foot-wide footing must be at least 5 feet wide at the base of the excavation. If lean concrete is used, the overexcavation need only extend 6 inches beyond the edges of the footing. The following allowable bearing pressures are appropriate for footings constructed according to the above recommendations: Allowable Bearing Condition Bearing Pressure Placed directly on competent 3,000 psf gravelly sand. • Supported on structural fill 2,000 psf placed above competent, native soil Where:(i)psf is pounds per square foot. Lateral loads due to wind or seismic forces may be resisted by friction between the foundation and the bearing soil, or by passive earth pressure acting on the vertical, embedded portions of the foundation. For the latter condition, the foundation must be either poured directly against relatively level, undisturbed soil or be surrounded by level structural fill. We recommend using the following design values for the foundation's resistance to lateral loading: Parameter Design Value Coefficient of Friction 0.40 Passive Earth Pressure 300 pcf Where: (i)pcf is pounds per cubic foot,and(ii) passive earth pressure is computed using the equivalent fluid density. We recommend a safety factor of at least 1.5 for the foundation's resistance to lateral loading, when using the above design values. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Daily Homes Inc. JN 99212 July 2, 1999 Page 5 AUGERCAST CONCRETE PIERS Augercast piers are installed using continuous flight, hollow-stem auger equipment. Concrete grout must be pumped continuously through the auger as it is withdrawn. We recommend that augercast piers be installed by an experienced contractor who is familiar with the anticipated subsurface conditions. An allowable compressive capacity of 50 tons can be attained by installing a 16-inch-diameter, augercast concrete pier at least 10 feet into dense to very dense sands. For transient loading, such as wind or seismic loads, the allowable pier capacity may be increased by one-third. We can provide design criteria for different pier diameters and embedment lengths, if greater capacities are required. The minimum center-to-center pier spacing should be three times the pier diameter. Based on our boring information, we estimate that pier lengths of up to 25 to 30 feet below the excavation level will be required in the south portion of the building to achieve adequate penetration into the bearing soil. We estimate that the total settlement of single piers installed as described above will be on the order of one-half inch. Most of this settlement should occur during the construction phase as the dead loads are applied. The remaining post-construction settlement would be realized as the live- loads are applied. We estimate that differential settlements over any portion of the structures should be less than about one-quarter inch. We recommend reinforcing each pier its entire length. This typically consists of a rebar cage extending a portion of the pier's length with a full-length center bar. Each pier can be assumed to have a point of fixity at 12 feet below the top of the pier for the computation of lateral load resistance. The loose soil against the piers can be assumed to have a design passive earth resistance of 200 pounds per cubic foot (pcf) acting on two times the pier diameter. Passive earth pressures on the grade beams will also provide some lateral resistance. If structural fill is placed against the outside of the grade beams, the design passive earth pressure from the fill can be assumed to be equal to that pressure exerted by an equivalent fluid with a density of 300 pcf. SEISMIC CONSIDERATIONS The site is located within Seismic Zone 3, as illustrated on Figure No. 16-2 of the 1997 Uniform Building Code (UBC). In accordance with Table 16-J of the 1997 UBC, the soil within 100 feet of the planned bottom of excavation is best represented by Soil Profile Type SD (Stiff Soil). The dense to very dense soils that will support the foundations are not susceptible to seismic liquefaction. SLABS-ON-GRADE The subsurface garage floor may be constructed as slab-on-grade atop the medium-dense to dense, silty sands, or on structural fill. The subgrade soil must be in a firm, non-yielding condition at the time of slab construction or underslab fill placement. Any soft areas encountered should be excavated and replaced with select, imported structural fill. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Daily Homes Inc. JN 99212 July 2, 1999 Page 6 • All slabs-on-grade should be underlain by a capillary break or drainage layer consisting of a minimum 4-inch thickness of coarse, free-draining structural fill with a gradation similar to that discussed in the following section, PERMANENT FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS. PERMANENT FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS Retaining walls backfilled on only one side should be designed to resist the lateral earth pressures imposed by the soil they retain. The following recommended design parameters are for walls that restrain level backfill: Parameter Design Value Active Earth Pressure * 40 pcf Passive Earth Pressure 300 pcf Coefficient of Friction 0.40 Soil Unit Weight 130 pcf Where:(i)pcf is pounds per cubic foot,and(ii)active and passive earth pressures are computed using the equivalent fluid pressures. " For a restrained wall that cannot deflect at least 0.002 times its height,a uniform lateral pressure equal to 10 psf times the height of the wall should be added to the above active equivalent fluid pressure. The values given above are to be used to design permanent foundation and retaining walls only. We recommend a safety factor of at least 1.5 for overturning and sliding, when using the above values to design the walls. Restrained wall soil parameters should be utilized for a distance of 1.5 times the wall height from corners in the walls. The design values given above do not include the effects of any hydrostatic pressures behind the walls and assume that no surcharges, such as those caused by slopes, vehicles, or adjacent foundations will be exerted on the walls. If these conditions exist, those pressures should be added to the above lateral soil pressures. The potential for surcharges from the adjacent southern and eastern buildings will depend on their foundation designs. The surcharge due to traffic loads on the streets or alley behind a wall can typically be accounted for by adding a uniform pressure equal to 2 feet multiplied by the above active fluid density. Heavy construction equipment should not be operated behind retaining and foundation walls within a distance equal to the height of a wall, unless the walls are designed for the additional lateral pressures resulting from the equipment. The wall design criteria assume that the backfill will be well-compacted in lifts no thicker than 12 inches. The compaction of backfill near the walls should be accomplished with hand-operated equipment to prevent the walls from being overloaded by the higher soil forces that occur during compaction. GFOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Daily Homes Inc. JN 99212 July 2, 1999 Page 7 Retaining Wall Backfill and Waterproofing Backfill placed behind retaining or foundation walls should be coarse, free-draining structural fill containing no organics. This backfill should contain no more than 5 percent silt or clay particles and have no gravel greater than 4 inches in diameter. The percentage of particles passing the No. 4 sieve should be between 25 and 70 percent. If the native sands are reused as wall backfill, a drainage composite should first be placed against the walls. The purpose of these backfill requirements is to ensure that the design criteria for a retaining wall are not exceeded because of a build-up of hydrostatic pressure behind the wall. The top 12 to 18 inches of the backfill should consist of a compacted, relatively impermeable soil or topsoil, or the surface should be paved. The ground surface must also slope away from backfilled walls to reduce the potential for surface water to percolate into the backfill. The sub-section entitled GENERAL EARTHWORK AND STRUCTURAL FILL contains recommendations regarding the placement and compaction of structural fill behind retaining and foundation walls. The above recommendations are not intended to waterproof the below-grade walls. The performance of any subsurface drainage system will degrade over time. Also, groundwater drainage patterns can change, even if seepage is not evident in the temporary excavation. Therefore, if future moist conditions or seepage through the walls are not acceptable, waterproofing should be provided. This typically includes limiting cold-joints and wall penetrations, and using bentonite panels or membranes on the outside of the walls. Applying a thin coat of asphalt emulsion is not considered waterproofing, but will only help to prevent moisture, generated from water vapor or capillary action, from seeping through the concrete. EXCAVATIONS AND SLOPES Excavation slopes should not exceed the limits specified in local, state, and national government safety regulations. Temporary cuts to a depth of about 4 feet may be attempted vertically in unsaturated soil, away from property lines, utilities, and existing structures, if there are no indications of slope instability. Based upon Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 296, Part N, the soil above the groundwater table would generally be classified as Type B. Therefore, temporary cut slopes greater than 4 feet in height cannot be excavated at an inclination steeper than 1:1 (Horizontal:Vertical), extending continuously between the top and the bottom of a cut. Flatter cuts, or excavation shoring will be necessary adjacent to traveled lanes of the street and alley, or near existing utilities. The above-recommended temporary slope inclination is based on what has been successful at other sites with similar soil conditions. Temporary cuts are those that will remain unsupported for a relatively short duration to allow for the construction of foundations, retaining walls, or utilities. Temporary cut slopes should be protected with plastic sheeting during wet weather. The cut slopes should also be backfilled or retained as soon as possible to reduce the potential for instability. Please note that sand can cave suddenly and without warning. Contractors should be made especially aware of this potential danger. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Daily Homes Inc. JN 99212 July 2, 1999 Page 8 TEMPORARY SHORING Cantilevered soldier pile walls will likely be the most efficient and economical method for providing excavation shoring. Soldier Pile Installation Soldier pile walls would be constructed after making planned cut slopes, and prior to commencing the mass excavation by setting steel H-beams in a drilled hole and grouting the space between the beam and the soil with concrete for the entire height of the drilled hole. Due to the presence of groundwater within 10 feet of the bottom of the excavation, the contractor should be prepared to case the holes or use the slurry method if caving soil is encountered. Excessive ground loss in the drilled holes must be avoided to reduce the potential for settlement on adjacent properties. If water is present in a hole at the time the soldier pile is poured, concrete must be tremied to the bottom of the hole. As excavation proceeds downward, the space between the piles should be lagged with treated timber, and any voids behind the timbers should be filled with pea gravel or a sand and fly ash slurry. The prompt and careful installation of lagging is important, particularly in loose or caving soil, to maintain the integrity of the excavation and provide safer working conditions. Additionally, care must be taken by the excavator to remove no more soil between the soldier piles than is necessary to install the lagging. Caving or overexcavation during lagging placement could result in loss of ground on neighboring properties. Timber lagging should be designed for an applied lateral pressure of 30 percent of the design wall pressure, if the pile spacing is less than three pile diameters. For larger pile spacings, the lagging should be designed for 50 percent of the design load. If permanent building walls are to be constructed against the shoring walls, drainage should be provided by attaching a geotextile drainage composite with a solid plastic backing, similar to Miradrain 6000, to the face of the lagging, prior to pouring the foundation wall. These drainage composites should be hydraulically connected to the foundation drainage system through weep holes placed in the foundation walls. Soldier Pile Wall Design Temporary cantilevered shoring with a level backslope should be designed for an active soil pressure equal to that pressure exerted by an equivalent fluid with a unit weight of 35 pcf. Traffic surcharges can be accounted for by increasing the effective height of the shoring wall by 2 feet. Existing adjacent buildings may exert surcharges on the proposed shoring walls, depending on their foundation designs. Slopes above the shoring walls will exert additional surcharge pressures. These surcharge pressures will vary, depending on the configuration of the cut slope and shoring wall. We can provide recommendations regarding slope surcharge pressures when the preliminary shoring design is completed. It is important that the shoring design provides sufficient working room to drill and install the soldier piles, without needing to make unsafe excessively steep temporary cuts. Cut slopes should be planned to intersect the back side of the drilled holes, not the back of the lagging. Lateral movement of the soldier piles below the excavation level will be resisted by an allowable passive soil pressure equal to that pressure exerted by a fluid with a density of p.FC TFr.H CONSULTANTS,INC. Daily Homes Inc. JN 99212 July 2, 1999 Page 9 350 pcf. This soil pressure is valid only for a level excavation in front of the soldier pile; it acts on two times the grouted pile diameter. Cut slopes made in front of shoring walls significantly decrease the passive resistance. This includes temporary cuts necessary to install internal braces or rakers. The minimum embedment below the floor of the excavation for cantilever soldier piles should be equal to the height of the "stick-up." The vertical capacity of soldier piles will be developed by an allowable shaft friction of 800 psf acting along the embedded length of the soldier pile. If the soldier piles are used to support the south end of the building, the frictional resistance should not be assumed to start above a depth of 10 feet from the bottom of the excavation. Because the piles will likely require casing or slurry methods, end-bearing should be neglected. The above values assume that the excavation is level in front of the soldier pile and that the bottom of the pile is embedded a minimum of 10 feet below the floor of the excavation. The concrete surrounding the embedded portion of the pile must have sufficient bond and strength to transfer the vertical load from the steel section through the concrete into the soil. DRAINAGE CONSIDERATIONS We recommend the use of footing drains at the base of all footings and backfilled earth retaining walls. These drains should be surrounded by at least 6 inches of 1-inch-minus, washed rock and then wrapped in non-woven, geotextile filter fabric (Mirafi 140N, Supac 4NP, or similar material). At its highest point, a perforated pipe invert should be at least 6 inches below the bottom of a slab floor or the level of a crawl space, and it should be sloped for drainage. Drainage should also be provided inside the footprint of a structure, where a crawl space will slope or be lower than the surrounding ground surface. We can provide recommendations for interior drains, should they become necessary, during excavation and foundation construction. We anticipate that the foundation walls will be constructed against shoring walls. Where this occurs, a drainage composite should be placed against the lagging prior to pouring the foundation wall. Weep pipes located no more than 6-feet-on-center should be connected to the drainage composite and poured into the foundation walls or the perimeter footing. A footing drain installed along the inside of the perimeter footing will be used to collect and carry the water discharged by the weep pipes to the storm system. All roof and surface water drains must be kept separate from the foundation drain system. For the best long-term performance, perforated PVC pipe is recommended for all subsurface drains. Groundwater was observed during our field work at an approximate depth of 19 feet below grade. If seepage is encountered in an excavation, it should be drained from the site by directing it through drainage ditches, perforated pipe, or French drains, or by pumping it from sumps interconnected by shallow connector trenches at the bottom of the excavation. GENERAL EARTHWORK AND STRUCTURAL FILL All building areas should be stripped of surface vegetation, topsoil, organic soil, and other deleterious material. It is very important that existing foundations and slabs from the existing GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. Daily Homes Inc. JN 99212 July 2, 1999 Page 10 buildings be removed before site development. The broken concrete could be reused as structural fill, if desired. Structural fill is defined as any fill placed under a building, behind permanent retaining or foundation walls, or in other areas where the underlying soil needs to support loads. All structural fill should be placed in horizontal lifts with a moisture content at, or near, the optimum moisture content. The optimum moisture content is that moisture content that results in the greatest compacted dry density. The moisture content of fill is very important and must be closely controlled during the filling and compaction process. The allowable thickness of the fill lift will depend on the material type selected, the compaction equipment used, and the number of passes made to compact the lift. The loose lift thickness should not exceed 12 inches. We recommend testing the fill as it is placed. If the fill is not compacted to specifications, it can be recompacted before another lift is placed. This eliminates the need to remove the fill to achieve the required compaction. The following table presents recommended relative compactions for structural fill: Location of Minimum Fill Placement Relative Compaction Beneath footings, slabs 95% or walkways Behind retaining walls 90% 95% for upper 12 inches of Beneath pavements subgrade; 90% below that level Where: Minimum Relative Compaction is the ratio, expressed in percentages, of the compacted dry density to the maximum dry density, as determined in accordance with ASTM Test Designation D 1557-91 (Modified Proctor). Structural fill that will be placed in wet weather should consist of a coarse, granular soil with a silt or clay content of no more than 5 percent. The percentage of particles passing the No. 200 sieve should be measured from that portion of soil passing the three-quarter-inch sieve. LIMITATIONS The conclusions and recommendations contained in this report are based on site conditions as they existed at the time of our exploration and assume that the soil and groundwater conditions encountered in the test borings are representative of subsurface conditions on the site. If the subsurface conditions encountered during construction are significantly different from those observed in our explorations, we should be advised at once so that we can review these conditions and reconsider our recommendations where necessary. Unanticipated soil conditions are commonly encountered on construction sites and cannot be fully anticipated by merely taking soil samples in test borings. Subsurface conditions can also vary between exploration locations. Such unexpected conditions frequently require making additional expenditures to attain a properly constructed project. It is recommended that the owner consider providing a contingency fund to accommodate such potential extra costs and risks. This is a standard recommendation for all projects. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. Daily Homes Inc. JN 99212 July 2, 1999 Page 11 This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Daily Homes, Inc., and its representatives, for specific application to this project and site. Our recommendations and conclusions are based on observed site materials and selective engineering analyses. Our conclusions and recommendations are professional opinions derived in accordance with current standards of practice within the scope of our services and within budget and time constraints. No warranty is expressed or implied. The scope of our services does not include services related to construction safety precautions, and our recommendations are not intended to direct the contractor's methods, techniques, sequences, or procedures, except as specifically described in our report for consideration in design. This report should be provided to any future property owners to inform them of our findings and recommendations. Additionally, this report should be provided in the project contract documents for the information of the contractor. ADDITIONAL SERVICES In addition to reviewing the final plans, Geotech Consultants, Inc. should be retained to provide geotechnical consultation, testing, and observation services during construction. This is to confirm that subsurface conditions are consistent with those indicated by our exploration, to evaluate whether earthwork and foundation construction activities comply with the general intent of the recommendations presented in this report, and to provide suggestions for design changes in the event subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated prior to the start of construction. However, our work would not include the supervision or direction of the actual work of the contractor and its employees or agents. Also, job and site safety, and dimensional measurements, will be the responsibility of the contractor. The following plates are attached to complete this report: Plate 1 Vicinity Map Plate 2 Site Exploration Plan Plates 3 - 6 Test Boring Logs GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Daily Homes Inc. JN 99212 July 2, 1999 Page 12 We appreciate the opportunity to be of service on this project. If you have any questions, or if we may be of further service, please do not hesitate to contact us. Respectfully submitted, GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Scott Stevens Geotechnical Engineer R 11'zcG of \ti A sJ1J j�r 27845 L' FCJS' V,O G � NAi. .r . ' 7/2/97 EXPIRES Marc R. McGinnis, P.E. Associate SES/MRM: alt GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. . .. r % I1-T- / I \ i •nNUIs I _ �. 0 'z.,N 5 to�J* 17t S I=RJ K m , i Blaxrrw,H �`� i N z - r = ®Nf ,."� M��Tq T ^ Prat6TH e '~viND,Tt :,[ .436rN Si 1. 'v�Craw RUIN ? } :/'. PL N 'P �^, `Y`m '•'. 9... ST H RrMIL < Z 2 / g BP:,`'0'! omfi, � h. ,oSttsA o Rwrar / EvP� HEZ [ 9 rs� / " ■ru N Ilir' 1 /c �F tnnxo e7: I Z,56■ S 126TN P t; p API 'r NS STMIIN r op 1} % i/ \` > LI '� f • S 900 ,� ST,ie .',DR. rot NorLE r rHrC 128TH ST i� 111111 4TH = ST n HILLS' 8200 Ian- D • 1100 4, ar 2500 'Q�` T= �r t ` 2�� ?gam Z S<< MOTH sr �j E, _ . fill&A .': 3RD lity:A. 405dFiro iimme {-.. i Ii mi-a it -pia RENTON "���(♦AN1_17=m i �. _ �IF �n all N V AIR'ORT� WY ��® - n a �J?`'� \�� �0 1 S 132ND ■ ��9.sr ' � sr� �® `' / NE 3 �'yc N iiii,,c-. ;^- l AIN'®ai` TOBIN74:Liam - 1100w g �/ it,,,„,,, 4. £ S ��qy < ..rt'C S i VICTORI. 300 Q v"cl� DNS� 7 • E r'S . ` Y+"'N� N 18 RENTON=4 nu /M�;•:LIBERTI CEDAR • < 1R><IMr. 4......., �+ W HS t < I i = OLIY£T iff $ ANG. S 2N0 g ST, Ln ''PAR' ,mu. cENETERr L�•. "��vita YNJi� �` .per, ..: 0 $ 3RDL'`��� 169°* 9:w6� ey R a 1141111/110,44._. 900 , . ,. �— RENTS P1AP c,, — b .o dc S 5v rN Ci PO •A wIN ~ ��/ \ \�`-- {� "1 ^ RC 2 crag L + >rsE S 6TH STg .6* I 1. 0 'Per sae, ___--- _ RwNritlEA .. SW 7TH�Iii 7 S •TH ST11. S 7TH CT iv tnIO <./, 8 ♦ ,1 , ..o ` II^ D a ato G�'�y 515 I I _E �`}`,�� E = F�. J I �5 5 'ENTON VILLAGE "-.•�6y LN O W I 1 w H ST .Rp�V Wy cr),--- F CENTER J 61 101E PM .4"`' 51 a ei e E R I' SW ® ■ S R: TON VILLAGE PL S 11TH ST C Rio WO HOLIDAY _ 'sF ' CFO \� PR f �� THE ST INN C��` 405 I - �•• �JF. • 2 c ♦ JCS y —405 I z altil 20 urt sr �<ISTN "�." iP\, SE 1 SW i 16TH I ST SW .:.scar �i STo- x y yr ``E••` � 'cfp j6,�T. a, d00 16TH S� a 8 S 16TH ST ° Z. E. �0.S Y sr yeel - S to k allhi.�. • 5�,.> THJ <' ����, y4 i vi 3 ,ueoI 1 c v v+ G �`' LSF+N CT b SW 19TH ST "nwrY N F ST , p ✓e`„" = s' ., 0. zA;.' a S 19TH ST 4.-TALB07I I-, nl8rN PL▪TT 5�D4 sr N' y 20TM ., fHIL( O?r S n4 n^ „pl r� u� ' 4.. 1 .e�N.A is I r PL Imo Do " PUGET ° e ` },.S�000rrf I B d� = y rii i 5 22N0 i SE 21sT W J j ET `,-(rQ pt..W SE •2ND PL-, 215T ST IS(• 60T V, t . "" SW 23RD ST S _23RD ST? .W a I Njg 2."'r'_ r��� '< E�7O"T+"3`tl :MID ! ''.* N N 4 'SE I W ,-V.._, 4.', � ='-- A �C S 62ND< < T ST a -- -J_I'" c ' r s� '26T i---- - _ "90 Q Q f. z6Tv ri i,s �\2 y s 1 S E. y 4, SE 163RD ST— O SW > 3 5,S `,r4 ^a ti. 1 ` SE 1.4TH — ST " SE 164TH .. 27TH P �'sT1TH ST ST IL 2RTH�APfsslT�gBtH CT '�c 28r- :v 10900 N_ 15E0065TH `!Jeiy 117005 • I S TN CC , : S t 0 -'1 a ' j , TT rl$ 's 9M u . 166TH�` -►--'_•'1'T < >ST .,„• -= f. x 29TH ST 5 4 t�.. 5.... PL s ST 15EI57THsT < SE a 166TN PL N 30 7 44 Q-x'= TH OCT H N 1 < ^ a 1-- S[1671 5~ 5W 30TH g ; s ._ SE 0S :x I ST • .. SE ]1ST ST 1sr cr »-< < 29 l.s = J SW 33R0 ST I I t, 4132N0 PL• _ '� $SSE 169TH L ZI SE 169TH ` �✓io ✓ R. = I w ) �' 1 F SE. llOTH ST 9 170TH iT ST "N ♦y S .4. AV < `, to i,r, 167 z „ Jr' lf`aTis sr ill T �\%. VICINITY MAP --- GEOTECH 232 BURNETT AVENUE S CONSULTANTS RENTON, WA Job No.7 Doter Logged By, Plots, ` --"" _ ' 99212 _ , JUNE 1999 1 2nd STREET S (R 1-&- ——I k- B 1 I I Ii II I -- - - -1 N B-2 sli w i Z I w ' ! P-1 0 P-3 a of I- i PROPOSED I- ' BUILDING w cP-4 0 P-2 I CO 0 , P-7 I / I � 1 Ii 1 i s B-3 P i 0 9 P-8 1 I I B-4 9 L-------- - --� EXISTING LEGEND: BUILDING 50 APPROXIMATE BORING LOCATIONS 0 APPROXIMATE GEO-PROBE LOCATIONS SITE EXPLORATION PLAN GEOTECH 232 BURNETT AVENUE S CONSULTANTS RENTON, WA I 99212 1 DUNE 1999 I 2 °� BORING 1 ��. ,s0 )'St4° ti.0 5 9€' ,S(2" v�° 5° � Description Concrete slab Light brown, gravelly SAND, medium- to coarse-grained, damp, medium- - dense 5 -- 24 1 10 — H=4.74% 29 2 15 — 50/6" 3 - becomes very dense SP — becomes wet 20 = 50/6" 4 I - becomes less gravelly • 25 50/4" 5 30 — 37 6 - becomes brown, medium-to coarse-grained, dense * Test boring was terminated at 31.5 feet during drilling on June 17, 1999. * Groundwater seepage was encountered at 19 feet during drilling. 35 — 40-- BORING LOG GEOTECH 232 Burnett Avenue South CONSULTANTS,INC. Renton, Washington 1Job: Date: Logged by: IPlate: 99212 June 1999 SES 3 ice;` 5 0° BORING 2 ,4y2, s°'� \V,aroti��\o �{ a 4���5G5 9 ( 5 Description Concrete slab Light brown, gravelly SAND, fine- to medium-grained, damp, medium- - dense 5 - - 62 1 - becomes dense 10 — 47 2 15 — 11 3 - becomes less gravelly, medium- to coarse-grained SAND, medium- SP dense 20 — 56 4 1 - becomes gravelly, wet, very dense 25 50 5 1 - becomes less gravelly 30 — 50/6" 6 1 * Test boring was terminated at 31 feet during drilling on June 17, 1999. * No groundwater seepage was encountered during drilling. 35 — 40— BORING LOG GEOTECH 232 Burnett Avenue South CONSULTANTS,INC. Renton, Washington Y - LJob: I Date: 99212 June I Logged by: ' Plate:4 I I - - o� BORING 3 9'21c< � \) Description Concrete slab Light brown, gravelly SAND, medium-grained, damp, loose 5 4 1 SP - becomes light gray/brown mottled, silty SAND, fine-grained, moist 10 — M=34,990 11 2 Light gray, silty SAND with silt layers, fine-grained, very moist, medium- - dense 15 — 11:21.7 SP 14 3 SM 20 _ 16 4 1 Light gray SAND, fine-to medium-grained, wet, medium-dense 25 _ 31 5 I - becomes medium- to coarse-grained SP 30 - 44 6 I 50/4" 7 • -wood debris and log * Test boring was terminated at 33 feet due to Auger refusal during 35 — drilling on June 17, 1999. * Groundwater seepage was encountered at 19 feet during drilling. 40— BORING LOG GEOTECH 232 Burnett Avenue South CONSULTANTS,INC. Renton, Washington IJob: ( Date: I Logged by: ' Plate:5 99212 June1999 SES BORING 4 ,0\e/�tio ,kRe.,< 0 04, Description -\Concrete slab Light brown, slightly gravelly SAND, medium- to coarse-grained, damp, loose 5 — SP 10 1 10 — 144.2% 26 2 I Light brown, silty SAND with silty layers, fine- to medium-grained, moist to very moist, loose 15 �' K 37.0%e 5 3 ' SP SM 20- 23 4 1 - becomes medium-dense, wet 25 1f26.7n — 50/6" 5 Light gray SAND, medium- to coarse-grained, very dense 30— 50/6" 6 1 - becomes less gravelly SP 35= 50/6" 7 1 40— 50/6" 8 ' 40.5= * Test boring was terminated at 40.5 feet during drilling on June 17, 1999. * Groundwater seepage was encountered at 19 feet during drilling. BORING LOG •- GEOTECH 232 Burnett Avenue South } CONSULTANT'S,INc. Renton, Washington 'Job: Logged1s I Date: I by: I Plate: 1 Ir 99212 June1999 SES GROUP FOUR, Inc. 16030 Juanita-Woodinville Way NE Bothell, Washington 98011 FAX(206)362-3819 (425) 775-4581 •(206)362-4244 e-mail:info @grp4.com PRELIMINARY STORM DRAINAGE REPORT Sheridan - Renton Mixed Use Project 2ND and Burnett Renton, Washington Prepared For: Daily Homes, Inc. 3316 Fuhrman Avenue, Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98102 206-328-3770 Prepared By: Group Four Inc. 16030 Juanita-Woodinville Way NE -v4p Bothell, WA 98011 Cm,FFNTp 206-362-4244 SFP• RFi 7-0At ING October 4, 1999 '`�Cc 7 l999 I A SR'a lr 4 w +) EXPIRES 10l's 9/0 I I SURVEYING ENGINEERING PLANNING MANAGEMENT Existing Conditions The site is located at the NE corner of the Burnett Avenue South/2nd Street intersection. It is currently occupied by a building structure which was used as a car dealership and is now vacant. The structure will be demolished for the current project. Drainage from the structure enters the existing street drainage system. Proposed Use The site will be developed as a residential/commercial project with 2 levels of underground parking. Proposed utility services (storm, sewer, water, electricity, etc.) will be served by existing services. Erosion Control The existing building structure will be removed for the proposed structure. The existing storm sewer conveyance system adjacent to the site will be protected from silt-laden runoff. Surrounding streets will be keep clean from dirt and debris. Drainage Runoff is currently discharged from the building rooftop, then drains into the existing street system. Runoff from the proposed structure will be collected and conveyed underground to the existing storm sewer conveyance system. As the site is currently impervious, no net increase in runoff is anticipated. The existing downstream drainage system should be adequate, as the volume of runoff will not be increased. • I UTILITIES NOTE ALL PROPOSED STORM WATER AND SANITARY SEWER DRAINLINEB, WATER i SERVICES,AND FIRE PROTECTION LINES • L CONNECTED TT UTILITIESSHAL WITHIN THE CITYO REXIS/W. LOCATIONSBE OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE FURNISHED BY THE OWNER. — --------•'2 6) CO � l I IVIED 7/27/99 _`_____ __. N DI'70'1d_E 560.05' (560.09'CI OF RENTON1`-----•—'-- •op -.._ ,,,r MIC S. BURNETT ST. WORK OF II r/ V 1 -..• —=,' - - - - - - ,..:‘,4,'. '. •-•- ,- :'.-.'-',:t.,7.72177.;:tri* .14...44-,,.?..4; fx .DOD'� sd Y dF i t i • $ j /� j Y Ilp 4 ;v G^ ry, Ar v P OPO DUFtDI ' 9 E is x ' I MrtJ O N/ "''' ^1 ' - " -''." ' . En DOOM........, t /� % SITE PLAN a r _1/ a„T c, 109 NO: • 0CHICA G-O TUTU_TL_ . URANCE COMPANY• f 1800 COLCre,7:A CENTRE, . 701 5THH AVE (206) 628-5666 1/t IMPORTANT: This is not a Survey.. ];t is furnish:d as a convenience to.ocate the land indicated hereon with referetur..e to streets :oxd other ian& No liability is assumed by reason of reliance hereon. TOWN OF RENTON . .._ 6.6.4r-rk-- 1 —t--' 1 io ,� , ° �� Oa �t i P--1' , • e. : 1A • y1�'y tit 1.'/ 7, /3 • A L 17 a 4 `� . 4 N • if o m trh �7 . k . sirs ,�` . >w ew `‘v ,o, !ro it , U A M • Zil z ,fin tih di 0 1l',1,hel ! �, ° �• � do - .--:14.:1 54, I•••• • g ; a Q a ,�� ly ,t ;5h�, �i`f f h / , tl . t;'a /z Bra' 3� S-Tr in ri r.. )7n i . ,. - 1 MA, g o b a N . d O V d d 41,- ' . ; t---•:1-- .1-- --r...;11.70 1 , illilij' ; ..-:;7. go 1 • . . . ) • . i i I__L. __ _____Ir , • ate•,.. • 1 . 4' Al- ' 11-;'::. , _, .,____ I T—1-, —I— 1 IS,o. r ---- Ts7. I �. ZI 39 l i_ i i�- i }' I ,.. - I 1 .. .i_..-.�.riw.- .Iw...•+•....•/..r../. ...� :_i._._T__ •.I 1 1 . 1 i f 1 { 1 / {i S r y w ` 1.......:_ 1 1II i j i I j 3 l • I _I I 1 t I 1 i •o • • V. r r i :of:4 0....YL....". _to. P- JP.....r :e .�r_ GAI0C11UCU rage 4. I 1 / TOTAL P.04 C AUG • rsy�; MEMORANDUM • DATE: 40W a 0 VH TO: Construction Services, Fire Prevention, Plan, Review, Project Planner FROM: Jana Hanson, Development Services Division Director SUBJECT: New Preliminary Application: a(EMDN It VSVU11 J t 1g LOCATION: 200 'LOCK or 90muk & coif cfZN' PREAPPNO. 9q -k'I A m''e�eet,in _with the plican�ilas been scheduled for I (=OO A� , Thursday, � Y� a�- j , in one of the 6th floor conference rooms (new City Hall). If this meeting is scheduled at 10:00 AM, the MEETING MUST BE CONCLUDED PRIOR TO 11:00 AM to allow time to prepare for the 11:00 AM meeting. Please review the attached project plans prior to the scheduled meeting with the applicant. You will not need to do a thorough "permit level" review at this time. Note _only major issues that must be resolved prior to formal land use and/or building permit application submittal. Please submit your written comments to LKU LtN E JL \( at least two (2) days before the meeting. Thank you. 6?-1(' A"644-4-469-e DAlEIOPMENT p CITY OF REN ONNING OCT 15 1999 RECEIVED qa7/Ff - -Preapp2 - �� f^ 0< Y O� + ` ® CITY OF RENTON FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU ��lv�o MEMORANDUM DATE: September 2, 1999 TO: Laureen Nicolay, Planner FROM: Jim Gray, Assistant Fire Marshal ii2"SUBJECT: Sheridan Mixed Use Building, Fire Department Comments: 1. The preliminary fire flow is 6250 GPM based on Type V 1 Hr. construction with a 4-hour wall on south side. One hydrant is required within 150 feet of the structure and Six additional hydrants are required within 300 feet of-the structure. The fire flow may be reduced by going to a more restrictive type of construction. 2. A fire mitigation fee of$55,252.00 is required based on $.52 a square foot of the commercial square footage and $388.00 per unit of the residential portion of the building. The basement parking area is included in the fee for the residential part of the building. 3. Separate plans and permits are required for the installation of the fire - alarm and sprinkler systems. 4. The basement parking area will need standpipes, exit stairwell enclosures and ventilation. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. City of Renton InterOffice Memo To: Laureen Nicolay From: Kayren K. Kittrick Date: September 14, 1999 Subject: Sheridan Downtown Mixed Use PreApplication Review NOTE ON PRELIMINARY REVIEW COMMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS REPORT: The following comments on development and permitting issues are based on the pre-application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision makers (e.g. Hearing Examiner, Boards of Adjustment,Board of Public Works and City Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by the City or made by the applicant. WATER • 1. There are existing water mains in Burnett Avenue S and S 2nd Street ranging in size from 8- inch to 24-inch diameter. The derated fire flow in the vicinity is modeled between 2500 to 6000 gpm with a static pressure of 66 psi. 2. There are fire hydrants in the vicinity that may be counted towards the fire protection of this project, but are subject to verification for being within 300 feet of the nearest corner of the building. 3. The proposed project is located in the 196 water pressure zone and in Aquifer Protection Zone 2. 4. The Water System Development Charge (SDC)will be triggered with the installation of new additional meters for serving the site. Redevelopment credit will be figured for the existing use. SANITARY SEWER 1. There are existing 8-inch and 12-inch diameter sanitary sewer mains serving this site. 2. The Sanitary Sewer SDC will be triggered with the installation of new additional meters for serving the site. Redevelopment credit will be figured for the existing use. SURFACE WATER 1. A limited level one drainage study and report is required proving the entire site is impervious and therefore the new construction will not trigger any of the King County Surface Water Design Manual thresholds for retention/detention/water quality. 2. The Surface Water SDC is assessed based on the total new impervious surface square footage as reflected in the final design. The proposed project does not trigger this fee. TRANSPORTATION 1. The traffic mitigation fee of$75 per additional generated trip shall be assessed per the ITE manual for this use,with credit for the previous use on this site. Sheridan Downtown Mixed use • PreApplication Review 09/14/99 Page 2 2. Full street improvements including, but not limited to paving, sidewalks, curb & gutter, street signs and street lights are required to be brought up to City of Renton standards if damaged or missing. The City of Renton will place new construction with improvements planned for the new transit center and Burnett Avenue. Coordination of entry and utility services is required immediately for inclusion in these plans. 3. All wire utilities shall be installed underground per the City of Renton Undergrounding Ordinance. If three or more poles are required to be moved by the development design, all existing overhead utilities shall be placed underground. PLAN REVIEW 1. A construction permit is required for utility services and any driveway construction. When plans are complete three copies of the drawings, two copies of the drainage report, a construction estimate and application fee shall be submitted at the sixth floor counter. A fee worksheet is attached for your use, but prior to preparing a check it is recommended to call 425-430-7266 for a fee estimate as generated by the permit system. CC: Neil Watts CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: September 15, 1999 TO: Pre-Application File FROM: Roy Publico, (425) 430-7289 SUBJECT: Sheridan Mixed-Use Building Pre-App#99-81 We have completed a preliminary review of the pre-application for the above- referenced development proposal. The following comments on development and permitting issues are based on the pre-application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision-makers (e.g. Development Services Director). Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by City staff or made by the applicant. The applicant is encouraged to review all applicable sections of the Renton Municipal Code. General: The subject property is located at the 200 block of Burnett Avenue S. The proposal calls for the construction of a four story, mixed-use structure on an _ approximately 0.96 acre site. This is the former Good Chevrolet site. The upper three levels will be developed as two separate buildings and will contain 90 apartment units. The units will range in size from 525 square foot studios to 1100 square foot two bedroom/two bath units. The majority of the units will be one bedroom/one bath. The applicant also proposes 4,100 square feet of commercial space located at the corner of Burnett Avenue S. and Second Street. Zoning: The subject site is zoned Center Downtown (CD). The purpose of the Center Downtown Zone is to provide a mixed use commercial center serving a regional market as well as adjacent residences. Uses include a wide variety of retail sales, personal and professional services, multi-family residential dwellings, recreation and entertainment uses and some light industrial uses. The minimum residential density for the CD Zone is 25 units per net acre and a maximum of 100 units per net acre. Net density is determined by subtracting the environmentally sensitive areas and public right-of-way from the gross site area. Sensitive areas include wetlands, streams, steep slopes, geologically sensitive areas, greenbelts, and floodplains. As proposed, 90 units would result in a net density of 93.36 dwelling units per acre. There are no sensitive areas or city right-of-way that must be deducted on the subject site. The 90 units at 93.4 dwelling units per acre meet the density range for the CD Zone. Lot Coverage: The project site is located in the Downtown Core Area. Proposed lot coverage for this site would be 98.9%. Since lot coverage in the downtown core can be as high as 100%, the proposal complies with allowable lot coverage. Minimum setbacks: There are no minimum front yard, rear yard, i r side yard setbacks in the Downtown Core Area. The proposal extends to property lines. Height: The maximum height permitted for structures in the CD Zone is 95 feet, except for uses located within the Federal Aviation Administration Airport zones designated under RMC 4-3-020, airport related Height and Use Restrictions. In this case, no building is allowed to exceed the maximum heights allowed by that Section. According to the pre-application materials submitted, it appears that the proposed building would be 46 feet in height at the building parapet. The overall height above sea level (ground elevation plus building height) would be approximately 92 feet, which is below the maximum height of 179 feet established by the airport restrictions. Access/Parking: Access would be directly off Burnett Avenue as well as South Second Street. Since the site is located in the Downtown Core Area, the project is exempt from parking standards, however parking is considered through environmental review. The applicant is proposing a Metro park and ride containing 150 parking stalls as well as 90 parking stalls for residential use. Site Plan Review/Permits Required: Since the project is greater than four dwelling units but less than 100 and is located within the Center Downtown (CD) Zone, Environmental Review and Administrative Site Plan Approval are required. Both land use permits can be reviewed concurrently in an estimated time frame of 8 weeks, assuming no appeals are filed. The attached application package provides a list of the necessary submittal requirements. The land use application fee is $1,500.00 plus postage costs (33 cents per mailing label). A building permit (and associated sign, electrical, plumbing, and mechanical permits) will also be required. At the applicant's option, the building permit may be submitted simultaneously with the environmental/site plan application. The processing time for a building permit is approximately 10 weeks. Criteria considered under Site Plan Review include: conformance with the Comprehensive Plan and existing land use regulations; mitigation of impacts to surrounding properties and uses; mitigation of impacts of the proposed site plan to the site; conservation of areawide property values; safety and efficiency of vehicle and pedestrian circulation; provision of adequate light and air; mitigation of noise, odors and other harmful or unhealthy conditions; availability of public services and facilities to accommodate the proposed use; and prevention of neighborhood deterioration and blight. Specific criteria the decision-maker will consider are included in RMC Section 4- 9-200E, _and the applicant is encouraged to review these criteria with regard to the proposal. Specific comments are not provided at this time, due to the level of detail provided with the pre-app submittal. We would be happy to discuss specifics of the proposal as the design progresses. Design Guidelines: The City Council, on September 13, 1999, adopted Interim Design Guidelines for attached housing project proposals located in the Residential Multi- Family — Urban (RM-U) and Center Downtown (CD) Zones, where those proposals trigger environmental review. The guidelines describe minimum design standards that project proposals must meet, and provide direction and guidelines for elements and features that should be included in the design. A copy of the design guidelines will be provided to you at the pre-application meeting. Generally, the guidelines address: building entrances, parking, open space, and building/design. Environmental Review: Environmental (SEPA) Review will also be required for this project. A SEPA checklist listing the necessary submittal requirements as well as the required fees is included with this packet. The 0.96-acre site is not indicated as sensitive on the City's flood hazard, wetlands, erosion, coal mine, slide hazard, greenbelt, and aquifer protection area maps. Impact Mitigation Fees: The following mitigation fees will be imposed through environmental review and are payable prior to issuance of a building permit. • A Parks Mitigation Fee of$354.51 per each new multi-family residence • A Transportation Mitigation Fee of $75.00 per each new average daily trip (based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Manual, Fifth Edition) • A Fire Mitigation Fee of$388.00 per each new multi-family residence Formal Land Use Submittal: As part of the formal land use submittal, we will need more detail on the Site Plan. Property lines, property line dimensions, as well as alley width were not shown on the preliminary site plan. We will need a more detailed Neighborhood Detail Map as well. Submittal requirements detailing the specifics and number of copies needed are included in this package. ....� :.. ....asi:^:;:::iiri.•:.�::i:i:::.':i`.ii.'i:'::::i ij`''y „ D W RKHEE . .:. . . ::.: 1. Gross area property: 1. i{2;00 0 square feet 2. Certain areas are excluded from the calculation. These include public roadways and sensitive areas*. Total excluded area: 2. square feet 3. Subtract line 2 from line I for net area (or total of lot areas): 3. Li 2,000 square feet 4. Divide line 3 by 43,560 for net acreage: 4. ° .16 Lf acres 5. Number of dwelling units (d.u.) planned: 5. units 6. Divide line 5 by line 4 for net density: 6. 73,312 d.u./acre q 0 lots would result in a net density of 73. 343 dwelling units per acre. * Sensitive areas are defined as "areas not suitable for development which are included within the City's greenbelt, geologically hazardous, wetlands, or flood plain regulations." (City Code Section 4-31-2: Definitions DENSITY.DOC • RECEIVED AUG 3 1 1999 • ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT. NEIGHBORHOODS. AND STRATEGIC PLANNING MEMORANDUM DATE: 400051 b O tcrq TO: Long Range Planning FROM: Jana Hanson, Development Services Division Director //��-- SUBJECT: New Preliminary Application: S R(l4N IML O [ V(�LU�& LOCATION: z ) QUk< •0v euVWCIT Poi S_ (6c coRN 2-N0 PREAPP NO. 91 ' S' • Please review the attached preliminary project plans for consistency with applicable Comprehensive Plan Policies. Please submit r written comments to �U e�t : IV • no later than (4QLK' �Lf' . Thank you. We will not be able to include comments received after this date in the presentation/summary we prepare for the applicant. 04-) 51 i C- IS 06,3)6,Ni tyr C i`r\ITa2 00 t- v-ro wn/, A,v r-v CI) . DovSit; I S ou7 UNIZ S //}c.2�z I H ee n('c k _ t S c_c- 4.5,S rC�?rv7 WIT►A 7FI-e ( 0L-I�c,I��'�3 o OWN7O i) .,r e'L�` Gov 1 of T 1-1- ) e2 t:1-\ery 5\V t�l R/V ``ya_ S �f1 TCG L �l�✓/vi/l;C` - preapp , • ; IF-7,,.i-r,•..,!..4fil ci-zit0,1..-- ' -4"1-4ustlif.\ i ,...-- • ..,-,,•;'F-1.',7*' \'4, -\;• 4.1":.‘417, t- ,\ • . • \ 1\ ,K>.• 7 1111;.'' _ 's.,-.i-....;:. :•,1-:... ' or ,..,t s- .. •4 1,1‘,-. Imo 1 " :iil Al l'.'-- ‘. - Arno . • .. :v-.. i,-,-,, , _ __,_ J ..% It .. -.,, ::,,,k..::J°.3.-. . ,: 1- ''t ,.,.. ,---- '. \--• - --..i. ' • . . ' . -:-.:•:‘,..z!,\"%al-' ,,N.....jtr:: --cc ."''' '''''‘...- .c."";.-." `:-.6 .i -'7""--mt g t''' ....:„ ,..„„ -?•--3.0.77,1....gLA •,....„.._„;;---- 11.4 T"'.. MI"' T 1 , .:-:,, 1 1---:', --'----%._ .' , -Zi,;'-''''' - f' -1111 _ ...-:-• -i` .,.,`° . ,,, „ .. _ ..' 1 'v'-‘ 1'14'6' ..-ztlaii4bfro%•,.. .: . "1 .;11'-''ReW;m41;;',.-4,10 '' - na950 *flritiMai -21 • - '''' 11111 -4"..-'''''''-.-Cs- .'! '''.4" intilliaji% • 9A ; -k I it liallatior 1: Z''4 . ',.. .o vo •-.4 MSC ' 12 -7;", s cs-N. ca.-- I.,•I, _--L' 4 1 I ol 11152g1 1. , -r• L------T ',tip, ti .i'• t**--•-- 4\ ?• ' NM -Z. ''' 4\ ,,,j. < ti 1)5 i ii 51 illgiCACY's I-'4.....-- , • ',...\•._--At--.••-.... "` .. •I• t ,-.>•0.___; 1,-,-.#:.\ . 1 W"...4 tik, .•,... \D. _ 1-2 f ' ------- _-• _ t -;'' . • t - '.; • :i. t.1 \ ‘...•:', ; • ..: <:', .(*. illipligni ME: 1 * . 4,5HATT '-' "'eft ' = =Pi MEI • r . •z I -•k-': ',1• i‘'''N- 1 g le02111! Mr- ' ' ..N.1,-. -)%.1...LT\ , 4'''' --4,, Mar "•-•;', ' 4...."- , ;,,, \ __,•,.,.....„- ., i! i.,.,, L.,, . _ ... .,V-T. • W ..1 iS ••,, V HITWORTH AVE. t. ' lib,'07 • gals 2 ...- Nil mi : A fficAlli . ...., .. q. .`..,,...N, . •,,N_.,,2 Nif4:1,!,t)i SIN . . S71, giar A77.....-'4 •'•.,. .-Lm zu=, -..,... mect TN 7 t_. 4.// ll .. n .,,' IT ER .,,,,Ii*.it% .4115 s""1.i•-st\ Zs.%..--- v....,- . , .MI1 , h• i ' ts..;,,d L.- ... .- ..:?.t. . . • s 7---t.I% ...-:' t%.*11* P.143 Eno .. ........,,, ,„„.. ,,,,• .,. .,t .. .. ,• .„, , , .. •-.: . ..-.).,,,,--,› ......•.., , •, - , -... :r. •_..L. =a -akilmv ;: .•.11.0113 i .-, g Ilr_11 s ... s •s.S., , 11:: ‘A::::*1:cotA,N•.:. ,1.. :. 1 1.. ..........IIMIIIjqj„..rl41174111c, ''''r- It:Z:1 I '''''.17\ , r•-mr.-1-1-A ,,, \ f4 _. •,...N. -,-...,.....f4,.... •- ..: 4.k......... 10.:i,:, cA ..,„.,.. ..,. .....1 ;.L.,,..„,. s;*.t.,s.-.1 „kifx:vi:_..1,blit...s. , ®-• .. 1 • . , -ATTuat--. ' 4.:>;.- •.,.,.• t. *.• '-!' --' . - - -...; - - -47.„„ °Go,-.--t•--- . W. .".569C40 -4 SS, X,, EMS I .4 9/4 AO•M ma VI U ,. 01191E14 • ti\el-, 1\ jd't EAP-\ °:,,,y7Ncv. kFl‘ l'Cl."- \-783930 .... IIIIEIGIIIIII !pa Kf ANNINENNI i 04„ . %,.._ f iiiimiL ,,,..- 11 . .... ,„. •.... ihmifill ENE. 1111 .• ,B•N Z.!.-' • ' . no , am., „.,.,. ,.. -5;l'•4'1‘••-•.- . 44't<; N::•., 1 cosrunr.s.zwz v t t ,. r, _.,ib,.stv.i i:.-al....:-.4., 7-* ..., --.. ,"/ ••••7 X MN! *1 ..-71_... t ".* Ta3.150 „ „Mt!:- 1 BURNETT IN,E. ., .. KEM21, E ''' ".rD" "'-'. ' • ; -tc.-..I% '‘.. • . I ...1,u& -t-F. RA 111 111 1 ...7,„: .... '.1'"' ,..;,,:.::: . - •A' ' - s " ' 'INCW" i'4‘.-• *-- dr ,.. c3A, .E\ON --7•Z Bo i ;•S. ' 4. d,i, 't-r 1 •-• '-..t.-1 ,-__ . -.... Alai 1 4 8' .- 4: 'N. . ..44. • ', . 1 4,.. ,,,,fk ,...... . -1 i i-3.,,, ..... „v._ ..(....,i. .,..A'• P a<4, milliffnemouvagg 1 L-11.1; 1g. f./ .,-- : le. z QT-i ..-VOW:Yrf%).'' 11 n" nutimmoungi...I:.Iv 1.: i .: • :. . . . ,.,..., . ,„ _, .„,.,„.,.1..,.,„ t ? Nits A , • WILLIAMS AvE. 4 % : ..i "" " " 2: " ," *1. ''•O' .. Ilti C• .... •• . ‘V Ni• /, N v.h. 4-.4.s.'I'ttl,h-111410.1ihi.% /4 , z4,,1_1,,_,N,...:‘ _:$: :111ii'S.'"' , -..., -,:l '--"":.-z‘!i ,.-',. .'t .*,.. A A:*;.• i - ...14._,.._Li..-27-.4.- ... 1111 v,,,. 1 , ,-•, ....--- I s•t ‘ 10 -, . . . ' i-, I bug '$N, ''''{,IV! ,,n• ti 71 6 cg\ It. agil 10..., 111 4.:.41%6 (f. .Q.7., • e , ,di" ,• t „,-,... , . . .- r• ; ; ,....• NI •• •; . • " • " I* , ',/ T. T, T, T. .... 3 ; 3. • ''' . - . 3 " ' ' ' •. ,•,, - . . ..o . .. . .• ..-, An. V 0'A ot's3 4 RENTON - • .3150 / '..i./ • - .; • f . L. F. - t. ..-.., :4 a,.---7:-• t% ; . ,. p, Expept... .;.. •A°1 N so. N.1 . ,.... ., , ; .; ; : ',,-. " ".t-=2 " " • " " --‘9,'' ' ' 1 lamil t ..,N.•./ 9C25iAil*JI4'. -.' 111 \ r :‘,-,;\.-,• 1 ii - ..4, ',,, ': 0 . 1 e.... . .• 6.-,\•• -....;i • 'i.), --1111 IR ..:41 :. ii „ ... ,. >, III = • \ 1- - .,'•;',-1 ‘-,'ix\ lilt 1 iii.,, G. 1.!it..4.1,1...1:. -.,,.. - 915 N% ,'. ,''''''''.617*-.1•-? -ITN l't 1:1411 AL tt IA 1 A 4., ...., . ., NAN. AVE a . , .,,,,,,,,,,,„,„„ , ,., t . "‘4111111PM kt • Oil ', tea t3t•L11 1:g t:t . - ' ib 1,,,_ . _I / (.1.,,ir 40 t .4,,,,,,,:. \t's •11 \ I Al': iNk. 11111111%•sl\114., 11 111/9.....iimil: Ell j ,:14`../Ht,.::.7, ".-.11";‘,. : :0, • ..'A• . " ......5.„:. Om "-:,, p ...iridildisi 1 bh-ch.: ., ,,,.* •.. ITZ -- 4/ : - r: - ke‘•i •-•. •t "... f......-..r: .4.: ,,,....-**•• .,-• 3 a =. : •, . . 7. r, • , ,...al °..ote ;.."'i"// 4,711,1'' • ,...E2 lig ..„1„..,.....i........„,„ ........,,,,..,..,.. . 4. / ,. .a. /34;" v .MILL AVE it .. ...3... ---rt-1.-- 7. / • /.:It 44Fir,.,,, P.W. . - i.t_• .T. : /..:/ ',Y.! TT, Ts, 1 . . • • ...;\-N, :•-•......,.....•:7. ./.' .../ : '‘..: --'‘....., .. 191111.00,.:,, .-4,4.., -, • ./: „., i :----.. ‘: ._ . ... 1„,/.11 \,1,..10!" .. .. „.... ,..,‘,I. :..,•..1.5y4.2 ;: 7,-p..‘..,:i.• ,... .:'.._. :•... ',:.4.i,ilaI• I V : - •Aw•_ -..,_ ,.1Euzimil,-,,%I vvs• ,.. ... N.,, is- _ _ .... , ,...,Emile ,,...;!: 44; 3 1. s,-,,'\ '..o'i u u g '../."/ A A .!. '.. I.. . '=- . , •s . : : ..... ."'"?.4...'.- --. :2 -,, .0 INNER ., .,.. ,.: ., . , .,. n CEDAR AVE B.........Alr' 7.7.7 •%.*V-2-, ,...... 1 , '1;1!•14" , • « ,., "...e 4$ . 4'4.OVIle :. « ... \ ••"...:?: : .PS 1 •c:„.‘ ,.!..„ /..7, .?' 'i '4•••11, ."'Ti... I 1..,,:N !....0 .% ' 13 9 s . -•vO 7.,4_.. .1 1: ..,.. \,,,- -4:'..7'-', •: 'I t' • ' :IN .".6 1%11 1".•1.'r,,s-- 't.? l'' r.•\ ‘‘.! k•e. ''....•' . ';.Z., • • 411* ,_ %. Is „ „ 4.:S.,_ • , , 1% 4%'"VZ• •44 (2) I ''Z • S4. • t?' fr N"..k,, . / ,, .. .* I.,' •S/•1"74,q/ '4v " '4-s• f . . PA NY.. ,,•Ifs:" ,,T•RAC TS ti', t*,,I Vi N' ; A 4 -cst ' 'ezi".---- 11 ---,. •,...i. 44 ?,,1 ENVIRONMENTAL KLISTAIIIII PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or"does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions ont ilIrcies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and • egiapp ' should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. 17YOFREN DN'\'iNG OCT 1 5 1999 RECEIVED Environmental Checklist A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicabl • yhertgQn All J�ceA (i5e 1' ,6i o VaAr G- 4 i ke> 2. Name of applicant: alai t !vanes 1ric. 3. Address and.phonp number,of applicant and contact person: Giver (ice lA boG4cc- :;3 I CP - (,c r tm a v, Ave E # 100 eic-t-i-i-c-- , Inl A 9.6 ( o 2- (z--ri Ge) 32g - -"no ?( --11 4. Date checklist prepared: 5. Agency requesting checklist: 61+7 o-f- Ile r Pr ev40mPnt Servrres Ddvl'sio/L 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Cern S ' is i oi-\ 5-t--ors- ( jo 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. N"? 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. 6c o I c k , ,rt.-,Y+ Phr I l w{cri w►evvca..,c -per r 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. ( 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. 6( lay, rro vCc ( Gtl (dtif) 1f-rvi ff 11. Give brief, complete/description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. t/onAile)-don of cr0 ararl-ment 00s in 3 5iorys over a f-- grad e, eark 5'frveh e, over beisern erf /eve,! pa►-k;sy, Tot-at res►drri*t t1 area ereb 5.,y6e,5P-. 7ofa/ Perkily yet ra 6 area inolJ► 60#1 aijrdcIe— n baseMe✓�" ca 77QOOJ,5 rnmereittl 5 are of 4-/oO5P is Qn�C I Q 1J rove l eS k rahi. a l 96 p �' 2 • Environmental Checklist 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications r lated to this checklist.- „ 1c*i Avvn u,e', +WeC4- t Z- Sow . vt /I It Sot t.-+'1. 3 r,Q s"1Ye A B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other • 1 b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. t t'c' •+c, t'11 ry � 1�(� ( ,se_/1 C� d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe.t\jt' LJ Ge vi s-IYN.ch ' i.h G{,4-e.-4 Ova 1 t 1-c e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate antities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. N, �'+II pros f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. ��. aXGuU �-Ch,ok) Wbt,l. OGc-4 aVY'ir e�v1:rir� g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 9ci h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: ritiri (-AA -fbc -11Nto 1 3 Environmental Checklist 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. rt t:k.( -t 11Y `f'CIA t Lo✓►511V t Cri b. Are there any off-site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: 3. WATER a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. i 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. NA- 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. �o 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year flood plain? If so, note location on the site plan. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. Iv o 4 Environmental Checklist b. Ground Water: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. tI c. Water Runoff(including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters, If so, describe. w► . orm d r wi 1I be C0IIQ<fd2 1!1 d +3povI-'s or rain wad-er /er/e/'3 anee cirrae fo 6'4y wbllfrdratram Sys torn, 2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: I ( +yx 04- Co vSt Ltc t7vl°. II 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: Ajoite, deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other — evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs ram: grass �J pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? 194- c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. NOPQi d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: 5 Environmental Checklist 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: N00./ Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other b. List,, /I any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. it evhct b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. ND c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Tp� a f - k �v ©c Cr vi 5+yt ch a), `? I 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. 1\1'9 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Tr f L,IL 1(1, link( ( -"Yi'.e' covtst �f�OVN K 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: 1 ,09i&O °f "Htit Sfire, cavl 51'Vv>!CMaV\ 6 Environmental Checklist b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hoursp noisee'wouulld come from the site. p 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: �I l 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent pro ernes? Ao/ i -,how rvor►\ iV re--(n Ouse b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. e 1 Lc7 c. Describe any structures on the site. YL�O ���� �� 611 5f1;r C MCC( h(oCC WGtA✓s°- 2/ ,�J� d. Will any structures be demolished? If so,what? kf-c-� CalA (C Dm 0 e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? ef24VtZ-e 1)013/Vt0 h CO)) f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? 9. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? OA- h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. , tv i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 4-c/L) 7 Environmental Checklist j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: 1(`�L nt-c I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: bbitlo vit Ste '[cc / (4 re'rind 9. HOUSING PrEr VIDNi "` a. Approximately how many units would be provided,provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. cl0 mi,ddl� I'n( niei uni f5 b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income'housing. - I NV vnif5 Pam{Jmin�feet c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: AM- 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. Tallest- he,hr ii 501-Prorn /IrsAeef jtac 1 �Jvi�c�in9 e)t+-ertor will be,/ sonry) C61trefe1 Sri'bef Cen'iPflt6iinq cid Vinyl sick NI b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? 1100_, c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? 0►^2� b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? 8 Environmental Checklist c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? N d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: N/A 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recre tional opportunities are in t e immed' to vicinity? On 6 t Cep .fie-rOot. .o o , Lot ct, _ rarY k- , k. fL. /Lf1/4,k,e, WA— . b. Would the pro osed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. N� c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. ,kC b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. AiPezi , c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: 01' 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site lans, if any. (,(A'mg/15( All'i— , i. - ,'3"--11-- 5filed/ S• TttAv A? Si-h(t,' Kaiinw-K- (i-li -- 40 b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest ransit stop? ..0„., ....... xjJ c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? �Lk, f__, 9 Environmental Checklist d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private? e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. (A/►` k11/0 W v\ g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any:/ 15. PUBLIC SERVICES 131/ta fg a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. -1-(,1 f 1 ct" c�{ —A C S +t(p o-E c ' cki°'am, b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. tr,,1 1111hytticr 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currently a able at the site: a ctnc ty natu gas cfr use a 't sew r se system, service, tele once, s ni � , tic p b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. - n / �� l re trek 6 Jt jii a v U,/-lX(/.Gt//�CnJ C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non- significance that it might issue in reli.lice upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentatioi of willful lack of full d'-c osure on y part. --, Proponent: ✓ � / - r Name Printed: ft Date: i n q gi 10 Environmental Checklist D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEETS FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS These sheets should only be used for 'actions involving decisions on policies, plans and irograms. You do not need to fill out these sheets for project actions.) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? flan Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? (70 (� ba \- 1 1WC , �i of- Coll ' c Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: Tut P 6 —f—ks Styh oft e� 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, flood plains, or prime farmlands? Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: 11 Environmental Checklist 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? kti)(Q) ffivrity007kftin, ca,, k,urat Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: it k '{-1)(Pkikitk U 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lea -,agency may withdraw any declaration of non- significance that it might issue in relian upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentati for iliful lac of full dis sire, n my art. 079 Proponent: V?Name Printed: (( / Date: ENVCHLST.DOC REVISED 6/98 12 September 7, 1999 Parking and Transit Proposed Mixed Use Project/Metro Park and Ride 232 Burnett Avenue South Renton, WA The proposed project is to construct 90 apartment units in three stories of wood construction over an at grade parking garage over a basement level parking garage. There will be 90 parking spaces exclusively for the apartment units. In addition, there will be 150 parking spaces designated for a Metro Park and Ride. Within the parking structure, a total of approximately 120 spaces to be set-aside for Park and Ride use by 6am every weekday morning and 30 additional spaces will be available by 8am. At other times during the day,these spaces will be available for resident parking. In addition, all residents of the 90-unit apartment building will be given a Metro Bus Pass for their use. DCL OP �'OF REN ONN1NG N SEP � 7 1999 RFC��V �D PHASE 2 ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT Proposed Mixed-Use Building 232 Burnett Avenue South Renton, Washington G E O T E C H July 14, 1999 CONSULTANTS, INC. 13256 NE 20th Street,Suite 16 ' JN 99212E Bellevue,WA 98005 (425)747-5618 FAX (425)747-8561 Daily Homes, Inc. 3316 Fuhrman Avenue East, Suite 100 Seattle, Washington 98102 Attention: Charles Laboda Subject: Phase 2 Environmental Site Assessment Proposed Mixed-Use Building 232 Burnett Avenue South Renton, Washington Dear Mr. Laboda: We are pleased to present this report for the mixed-use building to be constructed at 232 Burnett Avenue South in Renton, Washington. This report was prepared in accordance with the terms of our proposal dated June 9, 1999. Our methodologies, findings, and conclusions are summarized in this report. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Prior to our Phase 2 subsurface explorations of the site, we completed historical research of the property. Sources reviewed for information on site and area development and land use included historic aerial photography, recent and historical maps, resources of the King County Assessor's Office and Washington State Archives, and interviews with people familiar with the site. We also completed a reconnaissance of the property to look for evidence of potential contamination in the form of soil stains, odors, vegetation stress, discarded drums, or discolored water and we reviewed a search by Vista Information Solutions, Inc. (VIS) of available state and federal government records. Our research indicated the following potential areas of environmental concern regarding the subject site: 1. The property has been used as an automobile repair garage and body shop since the 1930s and 1940s. The historical uses of the property conceivably had the potential to expose the site's soil and/or groundwater to hazardous substances from practices that, while common at the time, could have resulted in contamination by current state and federal standards. 2. A heating-oil tank was removed from the subject site in the mid-1980s. We were told that no contamination was found at the time of tank removal, however, we were unable to obtain any documentation regarding laboratory results of soil samples that were to collected from the tank excavation. 1 Daily Homes, Inc. JN 99212E July 14, 1999 Page 2 3. A waste-oil tank was installed around 1987 in the southern service garage. Reportedly, the tank was of double-wall steel construction and had a leak detection monitoring system. During our site reconnaissance, we observed the presence of the tank monitoring system. The tank was removed in 1996 and we were told that no contaminated soil was found in the tank excavation. Again, we were not provided with any documentation to confirm these findings. 4. The subject site has several underground hydraulic hoists located in the central and southern service garages. One of the hoists is reportedly in poor working order. A floor drain is also located in the central service garage, which is connected to an underground oil sump also located in this portion of the building. 5. One confirmed contaminated site is located adjacent, and upgradient, to the east of the subject property. The US West site, located at 225 South Williams Street, is listed with confirmed contamination of soil and groundwater by diesel-range hydrocarbons. Review of available reports on file at the WDOE indicated that, as of 1992, the contamination had not spread to the west, into the alley. It also appeared that the petroleum- contaminated soil was limited horizontally to beneath the US West building. Two groundwater monitoring wells were placed in the alley adjacent to the subject site, downgradient of the confirmed contamination. The reports on file indicated no petroleum hydrocarbons were detected in these two wells. Also, reports on file indicated that the contaminated soil was going to be bioremediated in place. However, it is important to note that no current information regarding the US West site was available for review. The potential remains for the contamination to extend southwest to the subject property. In addition to the Phase 2 subsurface explorations completed on the subject property, the two adjacent wells should be sampled and tested for petroleum hydrocarbons. We were not provided access to these wells. SCOPE OF WORK The Vicinity Map, Plate 1, illustrates the site and vicinity. We advanced seven Stratoprobe holes for environmental assessment of the subsurface and drilled four borings for geotechnical purposes. The seven Stratoprobe holes were performed in areas of anticipated environmental concerns including the aforementioned hydraulic hoists and the underground storage tanks. The geotechnical borings were advanced near the corners of the existing building and property extents. The locations of the holes performed on the site and the general layout of the property are illustrated on the Site Exploration Plan, Plate 2. METHODOLOGY Soil Sampling, Stratoprobe, and Drilling Procedures The Stratoprobe direct-push sampling equipment consisted of a truck-mounted hydraulic and percussion drive point sampling system equipped with 2-inch-inner-diameter rods. These rods advanced four foot-long 2-inch-inner-diameter split spoon samplers. The samplers were driven into the subsurface until groundwater was reached. Typically, the depths of the soil probes were approximately 20 feet below grade. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Daily Homes, Inc. JN 99212E July 14, 1999 Page 3 The drilling equipment for the geotechnical borings consisted of a self-propelled mounted drill equipped with 4-inch-inner-diameter, hollow-stem augers. The soil was sampled with a standard penetration sampler driven 18 inches at 5-foot intervals, using a 140-pound hammer in general accordance with ASTM Method D-1586. Soil samples from the Stratoprobe holes and test borings were transferred from the sampler directly to sterilized glass jars with Teflon-sealed lids furnished by the project laboratory. The samples were stored in an iced chest at the site and taken to the laboratory in the chest. Each jar was labeled as to boring number, sample depth, and field personnel. EPA-recommended sample management protocol, including the maintenance of chain-of-custody documentation, was observed at each stage of the project. Groundwater Sampling The Stratoprobe sampler allowed for direct groundwater sampling. Once to groundwater depth, the direct-push rods are retracted slightly and a stainless-steel screen was inserted to leave a screened interval. This provides access for a small tube that allows a low-flow peristaltic pump to bring the groundwater to the surface through the rods. The samples were poured directly into preconditioned bottles furnished by the project laboratory. Groundwater was typically encountered approximately 18-19 feet below grade. The Stratoprobe test holes were advanced to approximately 20 feet below grade. The summary below explains the reasons for the boring locations and depths within the building. � ...r d• -r v�i v y t � fl� �'"»A�zM .� -t $j w. a,� a _ ,y Fr . `?.>@rcX+'fi t��,�,r. Boring#,�, Placement Jushiicat�o r,Sample Depth � ��.ri;`Just�ticat�on_for depth o>�ampfle ` y ; P-1 Near Hydraulic Hoist/ Near 8'-12' / 18'-20' Hoist approximately 10'-12' below grade/ former paint booth areas Near groundwater level. P-2 Near Hydraulic Hoist 8'-12' Hoist approximately 10'-12' below grade. P-3 Near Hydraulic Hoist 8'-12' Hoist approximately 10'-12' below grade. P-4 Near Hydraulic Hoist 8'-12' Hoist approximately 10'-12' below grade. P-5 Near Hydraulic Hoist 8'-12' Hoist approximately 10'-12' below grade. P-6 Near former UST location 18'-20' No obvious indications of contamination in field screened soil samples. Groundwater approx. 19' below grade. P-7 Near former UST location 18'-20' No obvious indications of contamination in field screened soil samples. Groundwater approx. 19' below grade. During drilling, a field log was made by the project environmental engineer for each boring. Information recorded versus corresponding depth included soil classification (Unified Soil Classification System), color, texture, moisture, seepage zones, odors, and iridescent sheens. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. Daily Homes, Inc. JN 99212E July 14, 1999 Page 4 Laboratory Analyses Based on the background information reviewed for the site, hydraulic and waste oil are the probable petroleum products. There was also an indication for the possible presence of solvents due to the existence of paint booths. Soil and groundwater samples were evaluated according to the analysis outlined below: Quantitative Analysis Diesel and Oil: Washington Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon - Diesel (WTPH-D) for diesel- and oil-range hydrocarbons. The lower detection limit for this test is 20 parts per million (ppm) for diesel in soil, 40 ppm for oil in soil, and 0.2 ppm and 0.4 ppm in water for diesel and oil, respectively. Solvents: EPA Method 8021-B for solvents. P-1 (18'-20') was the only sample tested by this method. This analytical approach is intended to provide a basis for comparing the site environment to existing standards offered in the Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA), Chapter 173-340, Washington Administrative Code. FINDINGS Surface The property consists of two rectangles and is located on the southeastern corner of the intersection of 2nd Street South and Burnett Avenue South in Renton, Washington. The site is approximately 46,000 square feet in size and is flat. Currently, the lot is developed with two structures that are separated by a covered drive connecting Burnett Avenue South and the adjacent eastern alley. The general layout of the property is illustrated on the Site Exploration Plan, Plate 2. The northern portion of the building was utilized for body shop repairs and painting. The portion of the building below the covered drive was the maintenance shop. This is the location of the hydraulic hoists and USTs in question. Subsurface The soils encountered in the borings are alluvial deposits laid down by rivers and streams that have meandered through the Renton Valley following recession of the last glaciers. The denser sands encountered near the ground surface in the north borings and below a depth of 20 feet in the south borings have been deposited by more rapidly flowing water. The test boring locations are illustrated on the Site Exploration Plan, Plate 2. We also refer the reader to the borings logs, appended as Plates 3 through 9, for the specific conditions encountered at each probe/boring location. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Daily Homes, Inc. JN 99212E July 14, 1999 Page 5 Groundwater was encountered during drilling at approximately 18 to 19 feet below the ground surface in each of the borings. Monitoring wells were not installed in any of the Statoprobe holes or borings. Results of Laboratory Analysis The soil and groundwater samples tested yielded non-detectable levels of diesel-range hydrocarbons. The soil sample tested for solvents from P-1 yielded non-detectable levels. The detection limits analyzed for by the laboratory are below state and federal action limits for soil and groundwater. The laboratory reports documenting the analyses have been appended. CONCLUSIONS The results of the borings appear to indicate no large-scale adverse environmental impacts have occurred on the site due to the use of the USTs and hydraulic hoists. Even though all samples analyzed in our explorations contain no detectable hydrocarbons, localized pockets of potential contamination may exist that would not be detected in isolated explorations. The results given only indicate soil quality for the depths and locations noted and analyzed for. Because a fairly extensive excavation is planned, the budget should include some contingency for assessment, analysis, and the disposal of soil that may contain detectable contamination. Soil that even has a mild petroleum odor is typically not accepted at disposal sites, requiring that it be hauled to an approved facility. The current extent of contamination from the adjacent eastern property is not known. We were only able to review a report from 1992 at the Washington Department of Ecology. At that time, it did not appear that the contamination plume had extended onto the subject site. Based upon the results of groundwater analysis at two locations, P-6 and P-7, it appears that contaminated groundwater has not migrated onto the subject site. The adjacent property owner should be contacted regarding more current information. It should also be requested that they allow us access to their monitoring wells to retrieve groundwater samples. LIMITATIONS This report has been prepared for specific application to this project in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill normally exercised by members of the environmental science profession currently practicing under similar conditions in the area, and in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in our proposal dated June 9, 1999. This report is for the exclusive use of Daily Homes and their representatives for specific application to this site. No warranty is expressed or implied. If new information is developed in future site work, which may include excavations, borings, or studies, Geotech Consultants, Inc. should be allowed to re-evaluate the conclusions of this report and provide amendments as required. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Daily Homes, Inc. JN 99212E July 14, 1999 Page 6 • The following documents are attached to complete this report: Plate 1 Vicinity Map Plate 2 Site Exploration Plan Plates 3 - 9 Stratoprobe Logs Appendix Laboratory Results We appreciate our opportunity to provide environmental consulting services on this project. If you have any questions, or if we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact us. Respectfully submitted, GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Scott Stevens Environmental Engineer wAS,1, 4,0 /. ,Q 19660 9 icy 4 OISTE0' �� �SSIONAI•E�G /1y/ / 'EXPIRES 8/17/ 99 1 James R. Finley, P.E. Principal SES/JRF: alt GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. !'YS y, • J S 1=i. .lm jr•l Ifif1`l w:r. !� z N = l 6TH \ . I f '}1i'•YIV1.^04 I~ . CC ■ /Y� r m ��a 5tx Sr Z v CI:...M. < '2 1 '.�l /{ S� ..1�` \r/E t ,�..r' / S K m `, j i �i.K, SZ ~ ma z z z /] .t dot. `°NE W !' �s ` r SIB A .Imr.7m I I.- ' Z ri.w fi" liars. 5't .momrn H HST / c• �E. J{.� ' 5 26T+• ` 1 I ^ o Y / rs Stwttw i� )9,x,'"/ ,+. �,a ,, < CIT $ c aY1�1 o ?i! T < 1E13 K ~ ilNOS ST MThOSOR oat,.,E. rc. S J• 128TH 2 ST . y •:.,' av1 I 4TH 3 m ST 4 �`a N/(�AR4 1 2500 'c > oy iL EC ®�Y� 3PD < ®�/ 4�j t 5< iron' St i 1 L+®, O RENTCAV �IN��IM _ i ��. w : ,......f .§. 'a '�j - Pt N V AfR'ORT AIRPORT \©®� � sr� o gy h� ' �0 1 `1 _ WY 3 S .32N. sT I a ■ s TILLICI• dT '� z y: RLUc4' 1100 :�^,rrc,� �4 I ' TOBIN ST�4., „sr t �� t S '�ly.e. z 1 Sw I 1L at S Sili C OR1, �� ¢ r.�. t�L' e� 17 i \ T . ' p RENTON v \ .'`{?� \�Utlxi e. 1 H� �' N d:,,j1.1r.t 1011$ :. rM L78ERTi tCELMR `z < OLIYET. c. S' 2ND h PARK RIVER g crrrirr .41 13 ''''. : 900 y�7Rol ra. Y RO rl• ST,�� ®,, ! v. - - N t s� .rrc. S 3RDpil �•:t :� 169 V boa [e ENO =�.�.a900....—� /i. 900 W } SUNSINO s b ������V i ',, , s ?F BN s►I to rr 0 y.f` .® STH 7c ST Bc^ S I T E. e;O � y f fAilL I G�:� ERR iita,11 :Nrr .? -® < s 6rH sr F1—_ s ii.c, SW 7TH y 167 �w �' Z S 7TH T -s , tN8 ��iI 1 ♦ _ 3 z-z„ s = �I'<1 D Gw'G 515 � �=. " E - ek- - 16 I ,y� CNTON VILLAGE S ARNOLD, �.� Sp I SW W�N '�` CfMI(R /JJ - inn gi p'- PARK''" �,Sfl 0 ei f A I k 1 It ST I•G�D� ■ S R.ITQN mina PL r' S1 S IItH st f E Rio Cf sar F I N INN 7. �\ .. I..I ramie * �, 7. 405 q_ s. _.�i1 .� • • 1."ME 20 T� c —405 SW 1 ' s- 1srH � '` cow << �c''' •`'.. SW 16T1{ I I ST Sr t • _ r. � • � O S. ••. 94• 16� ;/ o q0 16TH ST :��� s I erN ST Iii �, St =w 4<3F c� tr: t s „ \F z 3 u 1 t ol,-. - S 18TH rr 19 'i`+;s.. J I IM~I .` ST A o Jr.�ri�_,S. �•J't � �• -SW 19TH Sr ouK,.1% Inv Y , o 47at =a . �." <:.�SI.:. 1-1-11 G S 19TH STS ap TAL80I, Y +'I d`�i�` cr f :�,�: M. I,U :O ra ., PSI S n^ ml . Y.r,f "r a � , CC i r 1100 PUGET J� p+,'" a. ? ';t �+ a e� rm q2 •' aE 21 1: LC VJ iJ 1::is : - C 71ST St 'F ,50TH. , - `^ SW 23RD cr S _23RD" i ST= j 1. LIi( ._'___•.'r-=".41:•' , •!most A e 'MID i \ i'1' ` r b r e,r M rwout.3 e \ E. 62N0< i ST ._ i > __I ti �'' �1 • iM1•.f.a '1 eCT h S 1 U 1 W SE :'S'D ST N ti 1 1 aTH - - v) SW < ,- `;•.•., - ° S 21TH ST� ST SE 164TH 27iH /� t+ T`i �\\ ::::.:—..1. 7 u11100 <i, 11700, • ST S �s,F,`. N CT - \��teT :,,,,IN: 1^- SE 1'.SrH J.'T1 '� rcf+' '<S '" S " 1551H•.; � < In ` Si ::-.4 f:..d ?TH ST y`a`��ouaJ.`'; rl 'r� W ST _ z St ` - S[=:55r11 Pt; `. 30 a k — N GPI�a�. !pia CT ' Na f - _ Q1==tsL sal I ST S •]1ST Sr ISr CT 5. < w e� - ! i7' �j 7:a0 rl `^ =''SE :53TH L - SE 1'.9ri ', I �A -: 73aD ST I I `.� 1�~ SE`-r1,:"- ST - " ST , 0, v, �� yy 17C-1. <1 • VICINITY MAP GEOTECH 232 BURNETT AVENUE S CONSULTANTS RENTON, WA I _ I Joe No., I Dale:UNE 1999 Lowe/By: Plots 1 99212 J i GEOPROBE BORING P-1 964 ��a_\� 5°���� r Description \Concrete Slab — 1 Light brown SAND, fine- to medium-grained, dry, loose to medium-dense _ - becomes medium-grained 5 - some gravel 2 — - becomes gravelly, slightly silty 10 --- 3 SP — 4 15 - becomes damp to moist — I 5 N% - becomes wet - becomes medium-to coarse-grained 20 — * Boring completed to 20 feet on June 16, 1999 using the GeoprobeT'" sampling system. Continuously sampled from 1 foot to 20 feet below ground surface (bgs). * 1 Indicates sample interval collected for possible laboratory analysis. * No visual or olfactory indications of contamination in soil. * Depth to groundwater CZ ) measured at approximately 19 feet bgs at time of drilling. BORING LOG GEOTECH 232 Burnett Avenue South �` CONSULTANTS,INC. Renton, Washington iN A ._� IJOE b No: ae: . I I July 1999 SES 3 1 { GEOPROBE BORING P-2 sod �5C Description \Concrete Slab Light brown SAND, fine-to medium-grained, dry, loose to sp medium-dense - becomes medium-grained with trace gravel 5 — 2 111 I Light gray/brown, silty SAND with silt layers, fine- to SP medium-grained, moist, medium-dense SM 1111 10 — 3 Light gray, gravelly SAND, medium- to coarse-grained, -' moist, medium-dense 4 SP 15 5 20-- * Boring completed to 20 feet on June 16, 1999 using the Geoprobe'T^ sampling system. Continuously sampled from 1 foot to 12 feet below ground surface (bgs), then from 18 to 20 feet. * ' Indicates sample interval collected for possible laboratory analysis. * No visual or olfactory indications of contamination in soil. * Depth to groundwater ( ) measured at approximately 18 feet bgs at time of drilling. BORING LOG GEOTECH 232 Burnett Avenue South �` CONSULTANTS, INC. Renton, Washington IJ0b99212E DJuly 1999 ILoggseEdsby: ' Plate: 4 1 ll GEOPROBE BORING P-4 �� ro� 5ae�c�SG� Description \Concrete Slab _ 1 SM Light brown, gray, mottled, silty SAND, fine-grained, moist, loose- to medium-dense Light brown SAND, medium-grained, damp, loose- to 5 — medium-dense 2 SP 10 — 3 Reddish-brown, silty SAND with silt layers, fine- to medium-grained, moist, medium-dense SP 4 SM 15 — -becomes gravelly 5 Light brown, gravelly SAND, medium-to coarse-grained, I SP wet, dense 20— * Boring completed to 20 feet on June 16, 1999 using the GeoprobeTm sampling system. Continuously sampled from 1 foot to 12 feet below ground surface (bgs), then from 18 to 20 feet. * Indicates sample interval collected for possible laboratory analysis. * No visual or olfactory indications of contamination in soil. * Depth to groundwater ( ) measured at approximately 18 feet bgs at time of drilling. BORING LOG GEOTECH 232 Burnett Avenue South CONSULTANTS, INC. Renton, Washington { . Job No: Date: Logged by: Plate: 99212E July 1999 SES 6 GEOPROBE BORING P-5 ��4 ro�� � ti Description Concrete Fill 1 Light brown/grayish, silty SAND, fine- to medium-grained, dry, loose-to medium-dense 5 — -with silty layers 2 `- - becomes finer grained SAND, moist to wet 10 — 3 Sp [SM 4 15 5 I -becomes dark gray, wet, dense 20 — * Boring completed to 20 feet on June 16, 1999 using the GeoprobeT"^ sampling system. Continuously sampled from 1 foot to 12 feet below ground surface (bgs), then from 18 to 20 feet. * 1 Indicates sample interval collected for possible laboratory analysis. * No visual or olfactory indications of contamination in soil. * Depth to groundwater ( 7 ) measured at approximately 18.5 feet bgs at time of drilling. BORING LOG GEOTECHI4 232 Burnett Avenue South , CONSULTANTS,INC. Renton, Washington I Job No: IDate: 'Logged by: I Plate: 7 99212E Jul 1999 SES GEOPROBE BORING P-6 5afi�\,0 SG� Description Concrete 1 SP Light brown SAND, fine- to medium-grained, dry, medium- dense 5 _ Light brown, silty SAND with silt layers, fine- to medium- grained, moist, medium-dense 2 - becomes gray/brown 10 — 3 SP SM 4 15 — 5 - becomes gray, denser, very wet 20— * Boring completed to 20 feet on June 16, 1999 using the Geoprobem, sampling system. Continuously sampled from 1 foot to 12 feet below ground surface (bgs), then from 18 to 20 feet. * 1 Indicates sample interval collected for possible laboratory analysis. * No visual or olfactory indications of contamination in soil. * Depth to groundwater ( ) measured at approximately 19 feet bgs at time of drilling. BORING LOG GNSULT EOTECH �` 232 Burnett Avenue South CONSULTANTS,INC. Renton, Washington _ Job No: Date: Logged by: Plate: 99212E July 1999 SES 8 GEOPROBE BORING P-7 c)e4�� �aro�c so, Description �SG$ Description \Asphalt and concrete Light brown, silty SAND, medium-grained, dry to moist, medium-dense 5 - -. 2 - becomes reddish-brown/light brown, loose 10 — 3 SP SM 4 - becomes gray/brown, fine-grained, medium-dense to 15 -- dense •- 5 20-- * Boring completed to 20 feet on June 16, 1999 using the GeoprobeT"' sampling system. Continuously sampled from 1 foot to 12 feet below ground surface (bgs), then from 18 to 20 feet. * 1 Indicates sample interval collected for possible laboratory analysis. * No visual or olfactory indications of contamination in soil. * Depth to groundwater ( Z) measured at approximately 19 feet bgs at time of drilling. BORING LOG GEOTECH 232 Burnett Avenue South CONSULTANTS, INC. Renton, Washington Job No:99212E Jury I Date:1999 l LoggedS 9 by. Plate: I l SE APPENDIX Laboratory Results GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. TRANSGLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL GEOSCIENCES NORTHWEST, INC. 800 Sleater-Kinney SE, PMB #262 Lacey, Washington 98503-1127 Mobile Environmental Laboratories Telephone: 360-459-4670 Environmental Sampling Services Fax: 360-459-3432 June 30, 1999 Shannon Spencer Ross Geotech Consultants Inc. 13256 NE 20th Street Suite 16 Bellevue, WA 98005 Dear Shannon Spencer Ross: Please find enclosed the analytical data report for the Good Chevrolet Project in Renton, Washington. StrataProbe services were conducted on June 16, 1999. Soil and water samples were analyzed for Diesel and Oil by NWTPH-Dx/Dx Extended on June 17 & 18, 1999. The results of these analyses are summarized in the attached tables. All soil values are reported on a dry weight basis. Applicable detection limits and QA/QC data are included. An invoice for this work is also enclosed. TEG Northwest appreciates the opportunity to have provided analytical services to Geotech Consultants for this project. It was a pleasure working with you, and we are looking forward to the next opportunity to work together. Sincerely, Sherry L. Chilcutt Vice President QA/QC FOR ANALYTICAL METHODS GENERAL The TEG Northwest Laboratory quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) procedures are conducted following the guidelines and objectives which meet or exceed certification/-accreditation requirements of California DOHS, Washington DOE, and Oregon DEQ. The Quality Control Program is a consistent set of procedures which assures data quality through the use of appropriate blanks, replicate analyses, surrogate spikes, and matrix spikes, and with the use of reference standards that meet or exceed EPA standards. When analyses are taking place on-site with the mobile lab, the need for Field Blanks or Travel/Trip Blanks is eliminated. If there is going to be a delay before sample preparation for analysis, the sample is stored at 4° C. ANALYTICAL METHODS TEG Northwest Labs use analytical methodologies which are in conformity with U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Washington DOE, and Oregon DEQ methodologies. When necessary and appropriate due to the nature or composition of the sample, TEG may use variations of the methods which are consistent with recognized standards or variations used by the industry and government laboratories. TPH-Gasoline, TPH-Diesel (Gasoline and/or Diesel, Modified EPA 8015, NWTPH-Gx and NWTPH-Dx) A check standard is run at the beginning of the day. 1) A close standard is run at the end of the day. 2) Both open and close standards must be within 15% of the continuing calibration curve value. All samples are prepared with a surrogate spike, and the recovery must be between 65% and 135% unless high sample concentrations interfere with the determination of the recovery percentage. A duplicate sample is run at a rate of 1 per 10 samples. At least 1 method blank is run per 20 samples analyzed. TRANSGLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL GEOSCIENCES NORTHWEST, INC. GOOD CHEVROLET PROJECT Renton,Washington GeoTech Consultants,Inc. Client Project#99212A Analyses of Diesel & Oil (NWTPH-Dx/Dx Extended)in Soil Sample Date Surrogate Diesel Oil Number Analyzed Recovery(%) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) Method Blank 6/17/99 101 nd nd Method Blank 6/18/99 127 nd nd B-1 8-12' 6/17/99 81 nd nd B-2 8-12' 6/17/99 110 nd nd B-3 8-12' 6/17/99 101 nd nd B-4 8-12' 6/17/99 87 nd nd B-5 8-12' 6/17/99 94 nd nd B-6 18-20' 6/18/99 103 nd nd B-7 18-20' 6/18/99 81 nd nd B-7 18-20' Dup 6/18/99 82 nd nd Method Detection Limits 20 40 "nd"Indicates not detected at the listed detection limits. "int"Indicates that interference prevents determination. ACCEPTABLE RECOVERY LIMITS FOR SURROGATE: 65%TO 135% ANALYSES PERFORMED BY: Sherry Chilcutt DATA REVIEWED BY: Michael Korosec QA/QC FOR ANALYTICAL METHODS GENERAL The TEG Northwest Laboratory quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) procedures are conducted following the guidelines and objectives which meet or exceed certification/-accreditation requirements of California DOHS, Washington DOE, and Oregon DEQ. The Quality Control Program is a consistent set of procedures which assures data quality through the use of appropriate blanks, replicate analyses, surrogate spikes, and matrix spikes, and with the use of reference standards that meet or exceed EPA standards. When analyses are taking place on-site with the mobile lab, the need for Field Blanks or Travel/Trip Blanks is eliminated. If there is going to be a delay before sample preparation for analysis, the sample is stored at 4° C. ANALYTICAL METHODS TEG Northwest Labs use analytical methodologies which are in conformity with U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Washington DOE, and Oregon DEQ methodologies. When necessary and appropriate due to the nature or composition of the sample, TEG may use variations of the methods which are consistent with recognized standards or variations used by the industry and government laboratories. Purgeable Volatile Halocarbons (Chlorinated Hydrocarbons, EPA 601/8021B) A calibration standard is run at the beginning of the day. The standard must be within 15% of the continuing calibration curve value. The standard is rerun at the end of the day. All samples are prepared with a surrogate spike, and the recovery must be between 65% and 135%. At least 1 method blank is run per day. TEG NW SEATTLE CHEMISTRY LABORATORY (425)957-9872,fax(425)957-9904 TEG Job Number: S90622-1 Client: Geotech Consultants Client Job Name: Good Chevrolet Client Job Number: 99212A Analytical Results MS MSD RPD 8021 B,pglkg MTH BLK LCS B-1 B-1 B-1 B-1 Matrix Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Date extracted Reporting 06/22/99 06/22/99 06/22/99 06/22/99 06/22/99 06/22/99 Date analyzed Limits 06/22/99 06/22/99 06/22/99 06/22/99 06/22/99 06/22/99 Chloromethane 250 nd nd Bromomethane 250 nd nd Vinyl chloride 250 nd nd Chloroethane 250 nd nd cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 250 nd nd 1,1-Dichloroethene 250 nd 93% nd 104% 87% 18% Methylene Chloride 250 nd nd trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 250 nd nd 1,1-Dichloroethane 250 nd nd Chloroform 50 nd nd 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 50 nd nd Carbontetrachloride 50 nd nd 1,2-Dichloroethane 250 nd nd Trichloroethene 50 nd 115% nd 119% 117% 2% 1,2-Dichloropropane 250 nd nd Bromodichloromethane 250 nd nd cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 250 nd nd trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 250 nd nd Chlorobenzene 250 nd 115% nd 86% 83% 4% 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 50 nd nd Tetrachloroethene 50 nd nd Dibromochloromethane 250 nd nd Bromoform 250 nd nd 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 250 nd nd 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 250 nd nd Bromobenzene 250 nd nd 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 250 nd nd Dibromomethane 250 nd nd m-Dichlorobenzene 50 nd nd p-Dichlorobenzene 50 nd nd o-Dichlorobenzene 50 nd nd Benzene 50 nd 101% nd 98% 92% 6% Toluene 50 nd 94% nd 89% 86% 4% Ethylbenzene 50 nd nd Xylenes 50 nd nd Surrogate recoveries: Bromochloromethane 99% 114% 106% 113% 114% 1,4-Dichlorobutane 98% 100% 100% 101% 103% Bromochloropropane 76% 118% 78% 69% 66% Trifluorotoluene 97% 97% 99% 97% 99% Bromofluorobenzene 98% 100% 100% 100% 99% Data Qualifiers and Analytical Comments nd-not detected at listed reporting limits na-not analyzed C-coelution with sample peaks M-matrix interference J-estimated value Results reported on dry-weight basis Acceptable Recovery limits:65%TO 135% Acceptable RPD limit:35% Page 1 of 1 (,:k TRANSGLOBAL CHAIN-OF-CUSTOL RECORD ENVIRONMENTAL egGEOSCIENCES SCI o(D2 2 — i CLIENT: 6 co 1 C CIA ro'-la II lc.' DATE: 677'. 4 t PAGE ( OF I ADDRESS: l3 S C. A/ -O fx, Sl' vel/e✓ve 4-• PROJECT NAME: ' 'ooc( C6-cJfoa• PHONE `If• -177- 56/8 FAX: q) 747- 8sG( LOCATION: al'' 130("ciYc Ave' )u-/ ge4,-4u1 S ' s �feva�� CAOLLEECTE TION 6/�G CLIENT PROJECT #: q4 is A- PROJECT MANAGER: 4KM �f^cep COLLECTOR: o e SN G, - ill �o Aar `/ v oo e° 4� ,i p / NOTES E •E E, '\ '''''YvZoZSam le oyycopy \_ y yAQaSample Number Depth Time Type Container Type -P Py 4 o - 0--1 17-.w I `f; i , So: ( No f,uei cj* . _ P (Xceg} letl.q, RELINQUISHED BY(Signature) DATE/TIME RECEIVED Y(Signature) DA glE SAMPLE RECEIPT LABORATORY NOTES: ( �yr LA- In u cl�b �l.Po e / ap/4,4/ i v.-go- irr Cir) 1' ).___l' to'ZZ•9q TOTAL NUMBER OF CONTAINERS ,.....5; ct<j2".A.........„„-- RELINQUISHED BY(Signature) DATE/TIME RECEIVED BY(Signature) DATE/TIME CHAIN OF CUSTODY SEALS Y/N/NA r SEALS INTACT?Y/N/NA �-r h (. TAT RECEIVED GOOD COND./COLD I SAMPLE DISPOSAL INSTRUCTIONS OTEG DISPOSAL 0$2.00 each 0 Return 0 Pickup NOTES: CAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMP/. 10 COLUMBIA CENTER, 701 5TH �. Title Unit: U-06 SEATTLE, WA 98104 Phone: (206) 628-5610 A.L.TA. COMMITMENT Order No.: 544387 Fax (206) 628-9717 SCHEDULE A Officer: DARYL/ROGER/BARB/PAUL/DAVID Your No.: SHERIDAN PROPERTIES Commitment Effective Date: APR IL 2, 19 9 9 at 8 :0 0 A.M. 1. Policy or Policies to be issued: ALTA Owner's Policy Amount: $0.0 0 1992 STANDARD Premium: NON-RESIDENTIAL PRIOR POLICY RATE Tax: Proposed Insured: � A4,/� O�r R 1 s ��T tiN414NG 1,98 Policy or Policies to be issued: # O Amount: $0 .0 0 ALTA Loan Policy Premium: Tax: Proposed Insured: Policy or Policies to be issued: Amount: $0.0 0 ALTA Loan Policy Premium: Tax: Proposed Insured: 2. The estate or interest in the land which is covered by this Commitment is: FEE SIMPLE 3. Title to the estate or interest in the land is at the effective date hereof vested in: SHERIDAN PROPERTIES, L.L.C. , A WASHINGTON LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY 4 . The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows: SEE ATTACHED LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT CHICAGO InLE INSURANCE COMPANY WLTACOMA/080995/RLK CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A (Continued) OrderNo.: 544387 Your No.: SHERIDAN PROPERTIES LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT (Paragraph 4 of Schedule A continuation) THE WEST 75 FEET OF LOTS 1 AND 2, AND LOTS 3 THROUGH 8, INCLUSIVE, BLOCK 25, PLAT OF THE TOWN OF RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 1 OF PLATS, PAGE (S) 135, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE EAST 5 FEET OF LOTS 3 THROUGH 8, INCLUSIVE, CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF RENTON FOR ALLEY BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 4332679. CHICAGO I11LE INSURANCE COMPANY cuacma6/1-15-97/rlm CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B OrderNo.: 544387 Your No.: SHERIDAN PROPERTIES Schedule B of the policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following matters unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company. GENERAL EXCEPTIONS A. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. B. Encroachments, overlaps,boundary line disputes,or other matters which would be disclosed by an accurate survey and inspection of the premises. C. Easements, or claims of easements,not shown by the public records. D. Any lien,or right to a lien,for contributions to employee benefit funds,or for state workers' compensation, or for services,labor,or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, all as imposed by law,and not shown by the public records. E. Taxes or special assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the public records. F. Any service,installation,connection,maintenance,tap, capacity or construction charges for sewer,water, electricity,other utilities,or garbage collection and disposal. G.Reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; Indian tribal codes or regulations,Indian treaty or aboriginal rights,including easements or equitable servitudes. H. Water rights,claims, or title to water. I. Defects,liens,encumbrances,adverse claims or other matters,if any,created,first appearing in the public records, or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS FOLLOW CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY WLTACOMB CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA.COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B (Continued) OrderNo.: 000544387 Your No.: SHERIDAN PROPERTIES SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS A 1. EXCEPTIONS AND RESERVATIONS CONTAINED IN DEED: FROM: KIRBY T. DEVERILL AND MAE E. DEVERILL, HUSBAND AND WIFE RECORDED: JUNE 13, 1958 RECORDING NUMBER: 3000106 OK AS FOLLOWS: RESERVING OIL AND MINERAL RIGHTS. a AFFECTS: PORTION OF SAID PREMISES c 2 . AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: BETWEEN: RICHARD C. STOREY AND HARRY G. STOREY AND: HAYDEN WILLIAMS AND RUTH WILLIAMS, HIS WIFE; AND JOHN SWANSON AND MARGARET SWANSON, HIS WIFE RECORDED: NOVEMBER 26, 1954 RECORDING NUMBER: 4512191 REGARDING: BOUNDARY WALL , a 3 . PAYMENT OF THE REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX, IF REQUIRED. THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SITUATED WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF LOCAL TAXING AUTHORITY OF CITY OF RENTON. PRESENT RATE IS 1.78%. ANY CONVEYANCE DOCUMENT MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY THE OFFICIAL WASHINGTON STATE EXCISE TAX AFFIDAVIT. THE APPLICABLE EXCISE TAX MUST BE PAID AND THE AFFIDAVIT APPROVED AT THE TIME OF THE RECORDING OF THE CONVEYANCE DOCUMENTS. s 4 . GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES) : CHICAGO I I fLE INSURANCE COMPANY dtacmbl/1-5-97/rlm CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 544387 Your No.: SHERIDAN PROPERTIES SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS YEAR: 1999 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 723150-2140-02 LEVY CODE: 2100 ASSESSED VALUE-LAND: $ 67,500.00 ASSESSED VALUE-IMPROVEMENTS: $ 56,700.00 GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES: BILLED: $ 1,663 .31 PAID: $ 0.00 UNPAID: $ 1,663.31 AFFECTS: THE WEST 75 FEET OF LOTS 1 AND 2 NOTE: IF THE TAX AMOUNT IS NOT EVENLY DIVISIBLE INTO TWO PAYMENTS, KING COUNTY WILL REQUIRE THE HALF PAYMENT BE ROUNDED UP TO THE NEXT CENT. FAILURE TO ROUND UP THE HALF PAYMENT MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF THE TAX PAYMENT BY THE COUNTY. 5 . GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES) : YEAR: 1999 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 723150-2155-04 LEVY CODE: 2100 ASSESSED VALUE-LAND: $ 51,700.00 ASSESSED VALUE-IMPROVEMENTS: $ 8,200.00 GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES: BILLED: $ 805.22 PAID: $ 0.00 UNPAID: $ 805.22 AFFECTS: LOT 3 c 6 . GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF CHICAGO III LE INSURANCE COMPANY dtacmb2/r1m/1.15.97 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA.COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 544387 Your No.: SHERIDAN PROPERTIES SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES) : YEAR: 1999 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 723150-2160-07 LEVY CODE: 2100 ASSESSED VALUE-LAND: $ 103, 500.00 ASSESSED VALUE-IMPROVEMENTS: $ 68, 000.00 GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES: BILLED: $ 2,294.53 PAID: $ 0.00 UNPAID: $ 2,294 .53 AFFECTS: LOTS 4 AND 5 NOTE: IF THE TAX AMOUNT IS NOT EVENLY DIVISIBLE INTO TWO PAYMENTS, KING COUNTY WILL REQUIRE THE HALF PAYMENT BE ROUNDED UP TO THE NEXT CENT. FAILURE TO ROUND UP THE HALF PAYMENT MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF THE TAX PAYMENT BY THE COUNTY. 7. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES) : YEAR: 1999 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 723150-2170-05 LEVY CODE: 2100 ASSESSED VALUE-LAND: $ 155,200.00 ASSESSED VALUE-IMPROVEMENTS: $ 113,500.00 GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES: BILLED: $ 3,591.67 PAID: $ 0.00 UNPAID: $ 3,591.67 AFFECTS: LOTS 6, 7 AND 8 NOTE: IF THE TAX AMOUNT IS NOT EVENLY DIVISIBLE INTO TWO PAYMENTS, CHICAGO IIILE INSURANCE COMPANY cltacmb2/r1m/1-15-97 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 544387 Your No.: SHERIDAN PROPERTIES SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS KING COUNTY WILL REQUIRE THE HALF PAYMENT BE ROUNDED UP TO THE NEXT CENT. FAILURE TO ROUND UP THE HALF PAYMENT MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF THE TAX PAYMENT BY THE COUNTY. I ' 8 . UNRECORDED LEASE, INCLUDING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: LESSEE(S) : GOOD CHEVROLET, A WASHINGTON CORPORATION DISCLOSED BY: DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8612311575 J , 9. DEED OF TRUST AND ASSIGNMENT OF RENTS AND/OR LEASES, AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTOR: KENNETH M. NIEMAN AND BARBARA A. NIEMAN AND HOWARD L. SHERIDAN AND DIANE J. SHERIDAN, D/B/A GOOD PROPERTIES, A WASHINGTON GENERAL PARTNERSHIP TRUSTEE: PETER E. PETERSON, WILLIAMS, KASTNER & GIBBS BENEFICIARY: GENERAL MOTORS ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION AMOUNT: $ 1,500, 000.00 DATED: DECEMBER 30, 1986 RECORDED: DECEMBER 31, 1986 RECORDING NUMBER: 8612311577 THE AMOUNT NOW SECURED BY SAID DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERMS UPON WHICH THE SAME CAN BE DISCHARGED OR ASSUMED SHOULD BE ASCERTAINED FROM THE HOLDER OF THE INDEBTEDNESS SECURED. x MODIFICATION OF DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: DATED: FEBRUARY 10, 1992 RECORDED: FEBRUARY 25, 1992 CHICAGO IIILEINSURANCE COMPANY cltaanb2/r1m/1-15-97 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA.COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 544387 Your No.: SHERIDAN PROPERTIES SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS RECORDING NUMBER: 9202250728 L MODIFICATION OF DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: DATED: MAY 5, 1992 RECORDED: JUNE 9, 1992 RECORDING NUMBER: 9206091583 rr MODIFICATION OF DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: DATED: JUNE 23, 1995 RECORDED: JULY 7, 1995 RECORDING NUMBER: 9507071005 x RESIGNATION AND APPOINTMENT OF SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE: RESIGNED: PETER E. PETERSON APPOINTED: CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY BY: GENERAL MOTORS ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION RECORDED: JULY 7, 1995 RECORDING NUMBER: 9507071006 o MODIFICATION OF DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: DATED: DECEMBER 29, 1995 RECORDED: JANUARY 18, 1996 RECORDING NUMBER: 9601180199 P ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: ASSUMED BY: SHERIDAN PROPERTIES, L.L.C. CHICAGO I I ILE INSURANCE COMPANY cltacmb2/r1m/1.15.97 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 544387 Your No.: SHERIDAN PROPERTIES SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS RECORDED: MARCH 10, 1999 RECORDING NUMBER: 9903103036 0 10. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AGREEMENT FOR SHERIDAN PROPERTIES, L.L.C. x NOTE: A COPY OF THE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AGREEMENT, AND AMENDMENTS THERETO, IF ANY, MUST BE SUBMITTED. s 11. ANY CONVEYANCE OR MORTGAGE BY SHERIDAN PROPERTIES, L.L.C. , MUST BE EXECUTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AGREEMENT AND BY ALL THE MEMBERS AND THEIR RESPECTIVE SPOUSES AS OF THE DATE OF ACQUISITION, OR EVIDENCE MUST BE SUBMITTED THAT CERTAIN DESIGNATED MANAGERS/MEMBERS HAVE BEEN AUTHORIZED TO ACT FOR THE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY. r 12 . TITLE IS TO BE VESTED IN PERSONS NOT YET REVEALED AND WHEN SO VESTED WILL BE SUBJECT TO MATTERS DISCLOSED BY A SEARCH OF THE RECORDS AGAINST THEIR NAMES. NOTE 1: EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1997, DOCUMENT FORMAT AND CONTENT REQUIREMENTS HAVE BEEN IMPOSED BY WASHINGTON LAW. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF THE DOCUMENT BY THE COUNTY RECORDER. FIRST PAGE OR COVER SHEET: 3" TOP MARGIN CONTAINING NOTHING EXCEPT THE RETURN ADDRESS. 1" SIDE AND BOTTOM MARGINS CONTAINING NO MARKINGS OR SEALS. TITLE(S) OF DOCUMENTS. RECORDING NO. OF ANY ASSIGNED, RELEASED OR REFERENCED DOCUMENT(S) . GRANTORS NAMES (AND PAGE NO. WHERE ADDITIONAL NAMES CAN BE FOUND) . GRANTEES NAMES (AND PAGE NO. WHERE ADDITIONAL NAMES CAN BE FOUND) . ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION (AND PAGE NO. FOR FULL DESCRIPTION) . ASSESSOR'S TAX PARCEL NUMBER(S) . RETURN ADDRESS (IN TOP 3" MARGIN) . **A COVER SHEET CAN BE ATTACHED CONTAINING THE ABOVE FORMAT AND DATA IF THE FIRST PAGE DOES NOT CONTAIN ALL REQUIRED DATA. ADDITIONAL PAGES: CHICAGO I'IlLE INSURANCE COMPANY cltacmb2/rlm/1-15-97 �'y CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 544387 Your No.: SHERIDAN PROPERTIES SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS 1" TOP, SIDE AND BOTTOM MARGINS CONTAINING NO MARKINGS OR SEALS. ALL PAGES: NO STAPLED OR TAPED ATTACHMENTS. EACH ATTACHMENT MUST BE A SEPARATE PAGE. ALL NOTARY AND OTHER PRESSURE SEALS MUST BE SMUDGED FOR VISIBILITY. FONT SIZE OF 8 POINTS OR LARGER. THE FOLLOWING MAY BE USED AS AN ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON THE DOCUMENTS TO BE RECORDED TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF RCW 65 .04 . SAID ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS NOT A SUBSTITUTE FOR A COMPLETE LEGAL DESCRIPTION WHICH MUST ALSO APPEAR IN THE BODY OF THE DOCUMENT: PORTIONS OF LOTS 1-8, BLOCK 25, TOWN OF RENTON, VOLUME 1 OF PLATS, PAGE 135. END OF SCHEDULE B CHICAGO I I I LE INSURANCE COMPANY dcacmb2/r1m/1-15-97 ID CHICAGO TITLE SURANCE COMPANY f 1800 COLUMBIA CENTER, 701 5TH AVE (206) 628-5666 1/I3 IMPORTANT: This is not a Survey. It is furnished as a convenience to locate the land indicated hereon with / reference to streets and other land. No liability is assumed by reason of reliance hereon. TOWN OF RENTON to Ai( f 5 /2 40 . //5 20 ti / Z° ttl I f .� 3 00 : T,'2° �' /e ti . 21, A _ 4 , 1 , ¢ , h hd° o 4 h k ; ram': 5 ti•,9 k ,1,�° ,�119 /6' < N 2:5 _ `" 111 \ ii f 4 in ro - - �h� titii �4 — r n :1 - r+ tih°,Yc ; y�c¢ Zo a B <,'ti, 0 MM /3 cu. _ 9 /0 I 06 s o ! ' Nf6 i n z b / O B6d 3�— CT , m p---y • • • - -� - ' S. • .-. ,...,..ter-,.r.., .. .- ....- • • • ` .0 { • • When Recorded,Return To: R Gerard Lutz Perkins Cale cn 411-1O8th Ave.N.E.,Suite 1800 Bellevue,WA 98004 As Oa � G Document Tide(s)(or transactions contained therein): a 41 1. Quitclaim Deed a3 M 2. 3. • r-i La Reference Numbers)of Documents assigned or released: (or pe _of (s)) CPO Grantor(:)(Last name first,then first name wd initials): 1. Sheridan,Howard L. 2. Sheridan,Diane J. 3. Q Additional names on page_»..of document. Grantee(:)(last name first,then first tame and initials): 1. Sheridan P,upc,tie,L.L.C. 1. 3, 0 Additional names on page—of document. Legal Description(abbreviated: i.e.,lot,Mode,past or saline,township,rinse) Pos..Lott 1 and 2,and Lots 3 through$,Block 2.5,Town of Renton Additional legs1 on pap l of document. Assessor's Pzvperty Tax PuzeWAttzaai Numbers 723 1 50-2 1 40-0r2;72 3 1 50-2 1 5 5-04;723150-2160-07;773150-2170-05 Qtl[TCLAl 4 DUD ?AM l (2:3333.000341A990539.1:461 3/9,)9 t.F .era--- . • U • . • t • • ea . QUITCLAIM DIED GRANTORS,HOWARD L.SHERIDAN and DIANE 1.SHERIDAN,husband and wife,for One Dollar and other good And valuable consideration,convey and goiialm to SHERIDAN PROPERTIES,L.LC.,a Washington limited liability company,the following-deacnbed real property situated in King C'xwmty,Waahingtnq together with all alter-acquired title of Grantors therein: The West 73 feet of Lots 1 and 2,and Lots 3 through 8,inclusive.,Block 25,Plat of the Town of Renton,according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 1 of Plats,page 135,records of King County,Washington: Except the East 5 feet of Lots 3 through 8 for alley deeded to the City of Renton under Recording No.4332679. DATED this day of,24ttt2h 1999. GRANTORS: lih.1:.Sshsidan (_ .."--" • • en Deane 1.Shen O STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss- COUNTY OF KING ) .M. On this 2. .d a1 of 1999,before me,a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington,duly commissioner rsvocq personally appeared Howard L.Sheridan and Diane I.Sheridan,to Q me known to be the individual,who executed the within and foregoing instrument,and acknowledged that they Vgi signed the same as their free and voluntary act and deed,for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. 09 GIVEN UNDER my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year in this certificate first above written. jr 110Ti4� Name- 1►' " b,•...r j Notary Public and for the Stitt of Washington,residing it: r'�'fua RxnA� e` vtd..04 iko' My commiaeion expires; �/`�r/ 3 F ;vr�illit ., QutrcI Ant DEED FADE 1 I2:3731aooarati990”0.02 ": _ yyy, • • TO THE i E TONYIL Of Be J r • orz • I /NG CO. !'YASH. I ! _I_.y.LD So .¢c 11nu1.loo rccr C ;THIRD — —ST.:, • 3u c,., c .....�s a , ST. I:lj. b I .,I • , .. .. r----___ w DESCRIPTION rn ;; • Ti",p/o/of-Sro. 11: a least 'e•9/e=FOO/r,pN r e T wN or AC NTONocc.'pe, a • a a •F I of/and desce,o,.> a fe✓br Bcq,e ,ngpo/aporn/ .,..,feel Nor/h of I �1- I WI r >a pr fee/ ,r..f of//.. Caenaeee...,..an to Jac/.an, ,r-,e-,.end ae of 1.•1 [_ '.. --ti . w s/aen,,e as N e.... rI AI/any Gou''/y Wosh^ So.d poser' be.nq „o rs.e. ' 1{{ •_I ' .�I feet o%n9 f,o wa,f of b/oew•r.r, o,a To.. .gun thane. S.a•ro•e., > I _ /o fh > e. ;s'y,no//ere of s/eP of Mom.pre/'a/ore doodad �. r 9 Y o soo• rhe.+c_ h,he non/ I.' I •, --�'• �, I w,rh uNP tP5.5 a,1 a . fsl of /o .>/ of s i • curt. /heeegh coo fear.fhanea J.• a'.a'esr e .test..bny tn. Sou//. morq.n o/S.<//.S/esar aner the North'mason, o/ /e«f of/ond h s aJ 1 _ foie a_edsa to Cord Gone, thence N e•,a'r tree feet. thane Al as..r'C. li 1:1'` J„loot to . o/beq.nninq .<csof.frq pee/eons nano/ofo.s eon' t,ea few . e as • I inr- Ai/-- the,c ond os.n n oa nano'. of ray ono'.nd.co%er h..aen as ,/.oars. - nq/e. //donna e ,on •s/,.e/s one o//rya ores o. 'Loon wean .:ff �'1 r y ,e 33 2. I I ,obt The /.fie/,ao,n/of rhos,o/or. .s the N E.Corner o/B/och ..o rh,eh ,s i _ • I eo feet Sou/h of and as f at w s/ of boron-sewn? e,here/ofo.b ,bran'. 20 !I) 11,,.,1 � I 14. DEDICATION ., , ,a If I /{,r a//'non by those•,oe.sen/s/fro/ era. E.e,..w M 5,,,,V/era. a I , //,a,,,✓omen a r.'Soroh✓a,..ss hu r.fe, Themes J.Themes serer Many✓. ....1 I Thon es fr,s rife.John ,W Tho...es end L.::s,..Theerros h,s note,and Easton? I;,4 . , I ,e JIlitra C..o ond Mo.ye..f£roes•h,. rife,oweroes /er f.. ma/e of/he hand en- 1;.r1 1 bearsd ,n 1h,s•S...rn,ns/Lr Aoo.r,o, ro>n,Tern• or Air,roN'do hseoLy ;•( • • � doe/crew tins swot.and do heeeby ded,co/. to the use of the pub/fc for _ 9F F I 'a vligrj 1.' r er.. rho srre.fs and o//sses s/.orn /he .4 I }� I / r,fn. , rher,o/ w/rote h.ee..n/a set orate frond enr seo/s II FOURTH ST�;> y• 4u ST th., 9 " da• y of/.beuery A.G /90/ `i i CIF .Erasmvs.MS/..i/fsea_. I ' 1 • /na„es ///Oars✓arms r i ,- c%`- i F.G.S.ni/her.------- -Sash✓orros .. '. • fj Da rid.C.L a w<s•__... Thomas.J..Thorr.o:_._ p •�i • �� �- -/ R.T.Lawa Mont'✓..Thomoa........q.� Ci ', j.• /1 • I i R.L.T/to/,,e .._ ✓oh,..N;.The,nss._--.- / / i /7.L.7hoerrs..__.__- .Lusis.d.Tho,rms q � is titers s to roeA Cdraro somas-- _ '.RRRiii /•. . %s./' s: I y M egeret,Z,t-ons.-__-�� 1.�'::j . •ia / ACKNOWLEDGMENT 4 S/oto ofGYosh,ny/on]s. • Caue.ty ot/finq f f - .� Y ♦.• I 95 Eta if ear nrbe.ed that per "hi. ,•'^day of':- • 7 a. } i - Febeuoey AO. /90/ be.fors ,.>a fire uner.s.gnad.a✓ast.ea of Peoca •�. L/ocfad quo/l od a•sciona in ond for the SA.Ie of,reah,nq/o...p✓sane//y doppsor_d eea ono.•M Smo/Ames.41//.bm✓ons: dSoeofr✓or..as his r.le. L, • t r l a i Thomas✓ Therms ono Mary./Thomas h,s 10,. her II.'Thorns sera L.i L. i i Thomas his r,fb and famed Lean. ore Morgerof Eeons hs r,�.to re e Is L. r Anown to be /he hd.r,eruo/s o seethed ,n ono rho esaeufed Ma ter. 1 F dad eaLon of p/of pond they ac/nor/edysa to me that' th s,ynea and ;., .1 • s I. WI a_ o a ey u ..a ,1 • o/.d /h s /h.,a /,rs ond vo/unfoey wet stood for proose.,,.e.:.....s_e.a'y • f ' Z' W/ass my hone and offs../sac//he day one, yes. ,n fhis i0 1a frI e.r/if,po/o f.,/ ebora rrv//or R.L.Theresa ' ,: �. 16 m I I ✓.sites of/he P o oily and ' II r. ••. I ,_ L foe/r.ny Coen/y Stole of �I 1 11 F- -�� M'e.h.nq/on r.,,dm7 of Aenfen �, •,. . • i ;FIFTH ST.: I I St ST. pfaunel ;il .. ,. . _ r__-______ {/,opeo✓cd by lhs Booed of Co..nfy Cem.rr..s.en_.. >h... sc••dey e/ S 24 '. March AO/.o/. l .o.<+•• rj:F' • r ' L.C.SmfL. '71 2 LI- as I p.✓.Ser./h t'.; ,m Board .r.Ce.Comm.:noea ij; I 22 f'4 - • 20512r.• i 4 a, LI I ,,-,/,‘, t.R�-coed of rho eep..as/ of£sere sr.ihs a JAD. 1 F; a/s pot/ .f,w ass eseo dad ,n V L otP/e/- pyou ra !'' y"F • �,C1 s 20 I Reco.as a/Hera Co .rosA ,• �/� ( / • I. • • �1 G. 3) i a f ./ - - °%�,/at' I I. I :/. , e ! I I c. ' ,i, I ~_' I 1 y .'.I I 1 r ,: , ,IJ� �. / i. SIXTHI1 .. • • ST. : I • d ,. • era+a Q. CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY tILED POR RECORD AT REQUPST OP CHICAGO TTTLE INSURANCE COMPANY THIS SPACE PROVIDED POR RECORDER'S USE 1800 COLUMBIA CENTER, 701 5TH AVENUE SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104 WHPN RECORDED RETURN TO ATTN: SUE CARLSON CITY OF RENTON 200 HILL AVENUE SOUTH RENTON, WA 98057 isiii,-11. 7 • 432682 •f g i _ STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED THE GRANTOR HOWARD L. SHERIDAN AND DIANE J. SHERIDAN D/8/A GOOD PROPERTIES, A WASHINGTON GENERAL PARTNERSHIP .1" ' CD (or and in consideration of CD TEN DOLLARS AND OTHER GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION :'• w • Y I I rr O in band paid,conveys and warrants to THE CITY OF RENTON, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION r 1 — the following described real estate situated in the County of KING State of Washington: , 0 1\ LEGAL DESCRIPTION ATTACHED HERETO AS EXHIBIT "A" AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A • �: PART HEREOF AS IF FULLY INCORPORATED HEREIN. c' t: `; SUBJECT TO: EXCEPTIONS SET FORTH ON ATTACHED EXHIBIT "8" AND BY THIS REFERENCE pre j MADE A PART HEREOF AS IF FULLY INCORPORATED HEREIN. !. q 4. I CI I • r / C. , _� 1 Dated: c 7 „ti := cV Ai V i l} 0 t '�/ corvfe., !ti ,64,...s. .ZZ 1 • aN iuAn '' `` 1 mA v �1 // , � �C c�= D J. St3ERIDRN J 4.1 STATE OF A HINCTON �' a'$ COUNTY OF BB 8 ON THIS k DAY 0 cc 1 BEYORE HE, THE UNDERSIGNED, A I NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR TH TATE WASHINGTON3,,NULY COMMISSIONED AND SWORN, E PERSONALLY APPEARED HOWARD L. SHERIDAN AND DIANE J. SHERIDAN, KNOWN TO HE TO BE THE ` INDIVIDUAL(S) DESCRIBED IN AND WHO EXECUTED THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED THAT THEY SIGNED AND SEALED THE SAME AS THEIR FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT AND DEED, FOR THE USES AND PURPOSES HEREIN NTIONED. • 1 8 PRINTED NAME: , ";i t\,\PN 'I?) 0f ..7 NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHING rS O - E RESIDING ATc p � :Q•,��� CB. •1 C o HY COMMISSION EXPIRES ON \ \O'G a NJ. E1436914 07/07/95 16020_00 900000.00 vanomn/2 /ax i _--_._.— -_ . " d i , r q-•• .•>��'�` :o`�i; . °'N "lwr�; /4tu$i; is • i' CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Escrow No.:432682 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION The land referred to is situated in the State of Washington,County of RING ,and is described RUOMM as follows: PARCEL A: LOTS 6 AND 7, BLOCK 1, SHITRER'S SIXTH ADDITION TO THE TOWN OF RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 26 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 47, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; '1' TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF THE ALLEY ADJACENT TO SAID LOT 6 VACATED BY CITY OF • I RENTON ORDINANCE NUMBER 2779, WHICH ATTACHED BY OPERATION OF LAW. _ . PARCEL B: • A LOT 1, BLOCK 1, MOTOR LINE ADDITION TO RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, )p RECORDED IN VOLUME 9 OF PLATS, PAGE(3) 50, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. • PARCEL C: . i .!Z s. LOTS 2 THROUGH 5, INCLUSIVE, BLOCK 1, MOTOR LINE ADDITION TO RENTON, ACCORDING TO -- .0 THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 9 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 50, IN KING COUNTY, 4.. WASHINGTON. •:. PARCEL D: ti t•: LOT 14, BLOCK 2, MOTOR LINE ADDITION TO RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, V RECORDED IN VOLUME 9 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 50, IN RING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; ii.•. EXCEPT THE EAST 6 FEET THEREOF CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF RENTON FOR STREET PURPOSESTO '�• 0 BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 910189. .!• wl PARCEL E: Q` ._. •;• O E . LOT 15, BLOCK 2, MOTOR LINE ADDITION TO RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, CD RECORDED IN VOLUME 9 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 50, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; +::,•:: 'n EXCEPT THE EAST 6 FEET THEREOF CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF RENTON FOR ST, COREET PURPOSES 1;: BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 910200. la1".', PARCEL F: LOT 1, BLOCK 2, MOTOR LINE ADDITION TO RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, c '.j RECORDED IN VOLUME 9 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 50, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, MORE 1 t PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS THAT PART OF BLOCK 2, SAID MOTOR LINE ADDITION TO •'.f RENTON, LYING SOUTHERLY OF A LINE WHICH IS PARALLEL WITH AND 66 FEET SOUTHERLY "?( 1::, I FROM THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOTS 2 AND 18 OF SAID BLOCK 2. .:'' PARCEL G: Ji:::,�i Sr:. ; LOTS 16 AND 17, BLOCK 33, SHITHER'S FIRST ADDITION TO THE TOWN OF RENTON, P:.• ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 9 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 17, IN RINC h. .I COUNTY, WASHINGTON; ♦, ' EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF SAID LOT 16 CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF RENTON FOR STREET, etr?'{ ALLEY AND ANY OTHER PUBLIC US6S RND PURPOSES BY DHED RECORDEb UNDER RECORDING IFJ.%( I NUMBER 7401170345. PARCEL H: LOTS 18 THROUGH 21, INCLUSIVE, BLOCK 33, SHITHER'S FIRST ADDITION TO THE TOWN OF f 1 ' ' RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 9 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 17, i I IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. • • CH I CAG 01TILH INSURANCE COMPANY (: • �V:r ti.l t. '7 :�R ;' 11 . , . l ' L { ;: iT . % c : �z'i1•: ' r' 101 fa ;. . _ d , , ?_r .:.1l: ..t::4 • ,•,,,! ) ,;•+ • CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY gi Escrow No.432682 i-'' L : . EXHIBur B I •S,'. 4 SUBJECT TO: macem 1 1. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: RESERVED BY: CITY OF RENTON PURPOSE: UTILITY �� AREA AFFECrEJ: VACATED ALLEY WITHIN PARCEL A . RECORDED: JUNE 18, 1973 RECORDING NUMBER: 7306180482 ' SAID INSTRUMENT BEING CITY OF RENTON ORDINANCE NUMBER 2779. 2. AGREEMENT AND THE TERNS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: BETWEEN: CITY OF SEATTLE, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION h;. `AND: PEOPLES NATIONAL BANE, TRUSTEE UNDER t. ' WILL OF J0NN SWANSON AND HAYDEN v'• WILLIAMS ESTATE - RUTH WILLIAMS, JERAY y•. HOLMES AND CAROLYN HOLMES, CO-EXECuTURS Et: ef RECORDED: JANUARY 6, 1984 ": • RECORDING NUMBER: 8401061023 4� REGARDING: PERMIT TO USE A PORTION OF CITY'S 66 z;:. _ $ FOOT WIDE CEDAR RIVER PIPELINE RIGHT OF tit : t WAY ADJACENT TO PARCELS B AND F r'.'' ., O O 3. RIGHT OF THE PUBLIC TO MARE NECESSARY SLOPES FOR CUTS OR ,^ , Ul FILLS UPON SAID PREMISES IN THE REASONABLE ORIGINAL GRADING OF ;''� : STREETS, AVENUES, ALLEYS, AND ROADS AS DEDICATED IN THE PLAT. t:::A AFFECTS: PARCEL A t" 4. ENCROACHMENTS, OVERLAPS, BOUNDARY LINE DISPUTES, OR OTHER Po.,� MATTERS WHICH WOULD BE DISCLOSED BY AN ACCURATE SURVEY AND + :"-I'' INSPECTION OF THE REAL ESTATE. ;:. . M_I.,. y• 1• .•l Oel A:.:1 • f. • CHICAGO TTILB BISURANC8 COMPANY v!f: 2,..,.11-im:„a-. _ 1,,.,.1',ttr':+!1.:•'•`•7: - ,• .., 1 .,-,,1,LFi• SN7 .iiLt,c..i� �tiz't�isn��it,4�'Lrn . . . • • • • • • • —71 . ,.61-vrtC_70 �I " ' MEMORANDUM OF GROUND LEASE 9Eras7 This Memorandum is made this 7 day of July, 1995 by and between the City of Renton,a municipal corporation of the State of Washington("Landlord"),and Sheridan Properties, L.L.C.,a Washington limited liability company("Tenant"). cr.) Tenant and Landlord have entered into a Ground Lease dated July 7 , 1995 •1 (the"Ground Lease"). t` 0 p 1. Property Description. The property demised by the Ground Lease is that certain property situate in the City of Renton, County of King,State of Washington, more particularly described in Schedule 1 attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein, together with all buildings,structures and other improvements now or hereafter located thereon and the appurtenances thereof(the . "Premises"). 2. Term. The term of the Ground Lease commenced upon the date of its • execution and shall end(unless extended pursuant to Section 1.B of the Ground a r• Lease)at 12:01 a.m. on the second(2nd)anniversary of the commencement date. it Pursuant to Section 1.B of the Ground Lease,provided Tenant shall not then be in default under the Ground Lease,Tenant shall have the option to extend the term of the •o j Ground Lease for five(5) successive terms of one(1)year each upon the same terms ti and conditions contained in the Ground Lease. V Y" 8 _, ) 3. Tenant's Option to Repurchase. Under Section 12 of the Ground [• -_ Lease, in the event Tenant determines it will not,prior to the expiration of the Term, "' relocate Tenant's automobile dealership to another location described in the Ground m Lease, then Tenant shall,upon expiration of the Term(or such earlier date as Tenant '•* shall specify) purchase the Premises from Landlord pursuant to the terms of the 8 Ground Lease. E . 4. Subject to Ground Lease. The terms of this Memorandum are subject • in their entirety to, and shall be controlled by,the terms and provisions of the Ground Lease. • • . E 8 tz g i- g PAGE I "I� li- t00000-000011.1.05Ia30.007t 7/6977:02 .r .I,�l 1-�..... . .. . +' I _ : ,,i,iC..,•:,/x::!ti),'-o.i)rv.,ir..iCl.•,.}itc'f5•.,,,,: • /110411116 • 111/ • • 6tal IN WITNESS WHEREOF,Landlord and Tenant have executed this Memorandum on the day and year first set forth above. Landlord: City of Renton,a municipal corporation of the State of Washington By: C�>,�� �•�1� Ear Clymer Its:Mayor Tenant: Sheridan Properties, L.L.C. By:de-0722e/Howard L. dan Its: Manager • o x:; vI STATE OF WASHINGTON ) z; ) ss. ti COUNTY OF KING ) 4' THIS IS TO CERTIFY that on this 7iI day of , 1995,before me,the undersigned,a notary public in and for the state of Washington, duly t, commissioned and sworn,personally appeared EARL CLYMER,to me known to be the Mayor of the City of Renton, a municipal corporation that executed the within and foregoing instrument and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said City for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he was authorized to execute said instrument,and that the seal affixed,if any,is the corporate seal of said City. PACES • (00000-0000/uA911950.007( 7/6955:02 pm • meEm t IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official I 1 seal the clay and year in this certificate above written. '''.. r. '`�P,•g.0.pf ti.' Print LISi9 EPff //S Q _•v; it - .: Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, VI' 11e ;ram=. residing at Prt�K +1 :,i 1' My commission expires: /fl—/`/-97 a ‘ pFi�, ,� I . • STATE OF WASHINGTON ) {I ) s s. °� COUNTY OF KING ) On this day of 1995,before me,the undersigned, a Notary Public in and forth ate of Nashington,duly commissioned and sworn, , personally appeared Howard ,Sheridan to me known to be the person who signed as Manager of Sheridan Properties,L.L.C.,the limited liability company that executed o the within and foregoing instrument,and acknowledged said instrument to be the free • ,: cand voluntary act and deed of said company for the uses and purposes therein :,: r- mentioned,and on oath stated that he was duly qualified and acting as said manager 0 of the company,that he was authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal o affixed,if any,is the seal of said company. :n ' WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year in this • r certificate above written. 4a _' S 11 cam` %.\\4., \?,1r`• ;"i:,I t Print N l .0 r 1 �5`�G• NotaryP lic in d for the State of Washington, Q • • '. t—to.'� residing aP—• c. S :.,,., h��)- �t�r'' My commission expires:\-k.A)- — i i PAGE3 7161933:02pro t00000-0000NA93 1 E30.007 1: l,:Y'r RS] • Schedule 1 PARCEL A: LOTS 6 AND 7, BLOCK 1, 3MITHER'S SIXTH ADDITION TO THE TOWN OF RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 26 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 47, IN KING COUNTY, 'b WASHINGTON; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF THE ALLEY ADJACENT TO SAID LOT 6 VACATED BY CITY OF R6NTON ORDINANCE NUMBER 2779, WHICH ATTACH BY OPERATION OP LAW. 0 PARCEL B: LOT 1, BLOCK 1, MOTOR LINE ADDITION TO RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 9 OF PLATS, PAGE(3) 50, IN KING COUNTY, NASHINOTON. pl. PARCEL C: LOTS 2 THROUGH 5, INCLUSIVE, BLOCK 1, MOTOR LINE ADDITION TO RENTON, ACCORDING TO � C. THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 9 OP PLATS. PAGE(S) 50, IN KING COUNTY, L CD WASHINGTON. CD r, PARCEL D: CD LOT 14, BLOCK 2, MOTOR LINE ADDITION TO RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, CD RECORDED IN VOLUME 9 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 50, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; O) EXCEPT THE EAST 6 FEET THEREOF CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF RENTON FOR STREET PURPOSES BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 910189. PARCEL E: LOT 15, BLOCK 2, MOTOR LINE ADDITION TO RENTON, ACCORDING TO TEE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 9 OF PLATS, PAGES) 50, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE EAST 6 FEET THEREOF CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF RENTON FOR STREET PURPOSES BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 910200. ]f PARCEL F: LOT 1. BLOCK 2, MOTOR LINE ADDITION TO RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 9 OP PLATS, PAGE(S) 50, IN KING COUNTY, I( SHINUTDN, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS THAT PART OF BLOCK 2, SAID MOTOR LINE ADDITION TO �} RENTON, LYING SOUTHERLY OF A LINE WHICH IS PARALLEL MITE AND 66 FEET SOUTHERLY FROM THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOTS 2 AND 18 OF SAID BLOCK 2. PARCEL 0: LOTS 16 AND 17, BLOCK 33, SMITHER'S FIRST ADDITION TO THE TOWN OF RENTON, ,. ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 9 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 17, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; y, EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF SAID LOT 16 CONVEYED TO THE CITY OP RENTON FOR STREET, F;..: ALLEY AND ANY OTHER PUBLIC USES AND PURPOSES BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING ' NUMBER 7401170345. ( �. PARCEL H: • LOTS 18 THROUGH 21, INCLUSIVE, BLOCK 33, SMITEER'S FIRST ADDITION TO THE TOWN OF RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 9 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 17, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. :. •i. •7 ^,•a • ,f411 , - "z ,^':>••i, • 1tip' ,r 05/11/1999 16:Z7 FAX 2066289717 CTI COBERCIAL UNIT 6 21012 0 HICAGO TTTLu�t�7SURANCE COMPANY /13‘ 1600 COLVMSIA CENTER, '701 5TH AVE (205) 628-5666 t ]MPCRTA : This is not a Survey. It is furnished as a convenience to locate the landiadicated hereon with reference to streets and other land. No liability is assumed by reason of reliance hereon. TOWN OF RENTON ,r� o ,,t n Ptif- ' 1 ( • ' f 75 /2 tilrl06 -za fro90" P • gli /9 : by tia0es '� A y 1 4 17 v. at 1 �4 ° 0' N g in i : ,... ' 16 `:1 l ul . o h i ..Z t, y9 a,2 = f J� d- J , D A f D J/5 \3' - ; i/ No :.... • • 12o na 2.i,At •51. 13 -wax) B4� •r_ ST, ro I [ i7e i -- ... 1 . MAr ******::************************************************ A******** City of Renton WA Reprinted: 10/07/99 11 : 11 Receipt **************************************************************** Receipt Number: R9905035 Amount: 1, 511 . 55 10/07/99 11: 11 Payment Method: CHECK Notation: #2755 DALLY HOME Init : LN Project # : LUA99-141 Type: LUA Land Use Actions Parcel No: 723150-2170 Site Address : 232 BURNETT AV S Total Fees: 1, 511.55 This Payment 1, 511. 55 Total ALL Pmts: 1, 511.55 Balance: . 00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 000 .345 . 81. 00 . 0017 Site Plan Approval 1, 000 . 00 000 . 345 . 81. 00 . 0024 Conditional Approval Fee 500 . 00 000 . 05 . 519 .90 .42 . 1 Postage 11. 55