Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA99-120 .x. ORIGINAL • vottovl BEFORE THE CITY OF RENTON • CITY COUNCIL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION FOR RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT SITE PLAN AND VARIANCE APPROVAL FOR THE RENTON HIGH MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF SCHOOL MODERNIZATION PROJECT APPEAL FROM THE HEARING EXAMINER'S DECISION FILE NO. LUA-99-120, SA-H, V-H • [32012-0805/SB003670.1381 2/7/00 I. INTRODUCTION A. Why the Appeal? This is an appeal of one condition of the Hearing Examiner's approval of the Site Plan and two Variances for the Renton High School remodeling and Performing Arts Center ("PAC") addition. In granting the variance to increase the maximum front setback for the PAC so that it will match the main building setback, the Hearing Examiner also required the elimination of a small, 12-space parking lot on the South 2nd Street side that would provide parent and visitor access to the main building, dropoff for the PAC, and parking for disabled persons. Because this small parking lot is essential to implement the School District's building security and personal safety plan by separating student, staff, and visitor access to the school, the School District is appealing to the City Council to remove the condition and restore the small parking lot. While there is clear evidence from the public hearing on the project and in the Hearing Examiner's record supporting approval of the small parking lot, the School District also recognizes that it may not have given sufficient emphasis in its testimony to the Hearing Examiner of the necessity of the small parking lot for the District's security and safety plan, leading to the Examiner's emphasis on the parking lot itself, and its location, and not on its critical function in the District's overall plan for the School and Performing Arts Center. Even so, we are satisfied that the testimony and evidence in the record of the hearing provides sufficient basis to grant the appeal and restore the parking lot. B. Project Description The Renton School District proposes to demolish the east wing of the Renton High School and to construct a Performing Arts Center in its place. As part of the project, vehicle parking, school bus dropoff/pickup, and pedestrian access to the school will also be reconfigured to improve building security and personal safety. In addition, significant renovation of the school building interiors will be carried out. The PAC will replace the existing east wing of the high school building. It consists of 16,500 square feet of floor area, is situated to be aligned with the existing main building façade, and is designed to match the "gothic revival" appearance of the existing building. A new student and event access and parking area, consisting of a 203-space student parking lot, a separated school bus dropoff/pickup area, and a new student building entrance, will be created north and east of the PAC. A small, 12- [32012-0805/SB003670.138] 2/7/00 space parking area (the issue on appeal) is proposed on the South 2nd Street side of the PAC to provide short-term visitor access to the school building, passenger dropoff for the PAC, and some parking spaces designated for disabled persons. The student parking lot will serve for general PAC parking during non-school hours. All areas will be landscaped according to City standards. C. City Approval of the Project The Renton High School project required Site Plan Review approval and two Variances from the applicable development regulations: (1) that the Performing Arts Center may exceed the maximum 25-foot front yard setback on South 2nd Street in order to match the existing main school building setback, and (2) that the project may utilize the existing 10-foot landscaping strip along the South 2nd Street frontage, which is partially on City property, instead of relocating the landscaping entirely within the school property. On November 18, 1999, the Renton Hearing Examiner approved the Renton High School project Site Plan and granted the two Variances, subject to three conditions: 1. The applicant shall eliminate the parking area in front of the arts center addition and may add or enhance a dropoff lane along the curb subject to review and approval of the City. 2. The applicant shall be required to provide an evergreen landscaping theme along the east margin of the site and erect or enhance a wall or fence that can buffer the uses located east of the subject site. 3. The applicant shall continue to explore methods of preserving the Redwood trees that currently provide a focus around the entrance to the main building. D. Appeal from the Hearing Examiner's Report The District has no objection to Conditions 2 and 3 and will fully comply with those requirements. Condition No. 1, however, is based on several specific errors contained within the Hearing Examiner's Report and Decision. Conclusions reached by the Hearing Examiner concerning the small parking lot on the South 2nd Street side of the school building were not consistent with evidence and testimony in the hearing record. [32012-0805/SB003670.138] -2- 2/7/00 Moreover, the Hearing Examiner's Report did not acknowledge, nor did the Decision indicate, that: 1. The applicant's burden of meeting the variance criteria is lower for "area variances" like the two variances granted for Renton High School than is the burden for "use variances." 2. The proposed small parking lot is indispensable to the School District's plan to separate building access and to promote security and personal safety. 3. The proposed small parking lot will be landscaped consistent with applicable standards and will neither violate the spirit of the Land Use Code nor contradict the spacious setting of the Renton High School. 4. The proposed small parking lot will provide the closest access to the school building and the Performing Arts Center for parents and persons of disability. 5. Including the proposed small parking lot with the variance is the "minimum necessary for relief' because Renton High School is unique and because eliminating the parking will be detrimental to the public welfare. 6. The proposed small parking lot is an integral part of the School District's setback variance request, along with the setback of the Performing Arts Center to match the original building. For these reasons, the School District respectfully requests that the Hearing Examiner's Condition No. 1 on the Site Plan and Variance approval, which requires the elimination of the small 12-space parking area on the South 2"d Street side, be stricken, and that the small, 12 parking space parking area be restored to the Renton High School project at its proposed location. II. DISCUSSION A. Decision Criteria for Granting a Variance Under the Renton Municipal Code, the Hearing Examiner has the authority to grant a variance if all of these four decision criteria are met: a. That the applicant suffers undue hardship and the variance is necessary because of special circumstances applicable to the subject property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings of the subject property, and the strict application of the Zoning Code is found to deprive subject property owner of rights and privileges enjoyed [32012-0805/SB003670.138] -3- 2/7/00 by other property owners in the vicinity and under identical zone classification; b. That the granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which subject property is situated; c. That approval shall not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is situated; d. That the approval as determined by the Hearing Examiner or Board of Adjustment is a minimum variance that will accomplish the desired purpose. RMC 4-9-250B(5) B. The applicant's burden of meeting the variance criteria is lower for "area variances" like the two variances granted for Renton High School than is the burden for "use variances. " Courts and commentators have distinguished between "area variances" and "use variances" in the application of variance criteria to specific requests for variances from development regulations. An "area variance" is one which does not change the specific land use but provides relief from dimensional requirements such as setback, lot coverage, or height limitations. A "use variance," on the other hand, allows an otherwise unpermitted land use. 6 Washington State Bar Ass'n, Real Property Deskbook §97.7(3)(a) (3d ed. 1996). The difference is significant because "courts generally approve area variances upon a lesser showing of hardship or practical difficulty than is required for a use variance." Martel v. City of Vancouver, 35 Wn. App. 250, 256 (1983). "A less stringent showing of hardship or "practical difficulty" is generally applied to requests for area variances."1 Cummings v. City of Seattle, 935 P. 2d 663, 667 (Wash. App. 1997). The School District requested two "area variances" for the Renton High School project—one to exceed the maximum setback distance in the Center Downtown zone, 1 Although stating this general rule,the court then distinguished this case on its facts because of the wording of the particular variance ordinance and because the ordinance did not permit use variances at all. Cummings at 667. This case was subsequently dismissed upon reconsideration, based on a settlement agreement by the parties. 1997 Wash. App. Lexis 1671 (Oct. 6, 1997); 1998 Wash. App. Lexis 689 (May 1, 1998). [32012-0805/SB003670.138] -4- 2/7/00 and the other to utilize the existing landscaping strip on the school frontage to meet the applicable development standards, rather than relocating the landscaping. Applied to the Hearing Examiner's decision on the Renton High School setback variance, the "lesser showing" rule for such an "area variance" should have required the Hearing Examiner to grant the School District's request for the setback variance without the condition requiring elimination of the small parking lot, because the District had made the showing of hardship related to the necessary function of the small parking lot. The Hearing Examiner's Conclusion No. 15 stated that "[t]he proposed parking pushes the variance limits and is not the minimum necessary for relief" This conclusion was based on a stringent hardship criterion that did not include the small parking lot for visitor and disabled access as the minimum necessary, along with the setback increase, to effect the District's building security and personal safety objectives. Based on the evidence and testimony in the hearing record, the standard for an "area variance" would have included the small parking lot on the South 2nd Street side. C. The proposed small parking lot is indispensable to the School District's plan to separate building access and to promote security and personal safety. In the Hearing Examiner's Report and Decision (November 18, 1999), the Hearing Examiner's Conclusion No. 12 stated that: While the goal of serving the front entrance of the main building with parking is intended to encourage use of the front entrance and appears congenial, the front entry can serve students, teachers or parents who arrive on foot or via transit. This Conclusion misses the fundamental School District objective in designing the small parking lot on the South 2nd Street side: the small parking lot is a key element in reconfiguring access to the high school buildings in the important interest of building security and personal safety for the students and staff. At the public hearing, Guy Overman, the School District's architect, stated to the Hearing Examiner that [o]ur initial criteria for the design of this safe plan was first and foremost to provide separation of access . . . . Anyway, our concern that this [the current access] created a very disruptive and very unsafe circumstance, and it was our goal to separate access for these different functions. [32012-0805/SB003670.138] -5- 2/7/00 (Hearing Transcript at 20)2. Mr. Overman presented the separation of access and circulation plan in detail, including the function of the small parking lot on the South 2nd Street side to separate visitors from the student entrance and to provide dropoff and short-term parking for visitors and persons of disability. Mr. Overman emphasized that this small parking lot is essential to the functioning of the school program and that this parking lot is limited in function and small in size. (Hearing Transcript at 20). Under the School District's plan, all student ingress and egress is to be from the student parking lot to the north and east of the Performing Arts Center. All teacher and staff access will be from the west parking area. Parents and other visitors are to use the small parking lot on the South 2nd Street side and the main (tower) entrance. The School District has determined that only by separating access to the high school can security and safety be improved. Thus, the small parking lot on the South 2nd Street side that was eliminated by the Hearing Examiner is indispensable to the School District's security and safety program and to the District's variance request. D. The proposed small parking lot will be landscaped consistent with applicable standards and will neither violate the spirit of the Land Use Code nor contradict the spacious setting of the Renton High School. In the Hearing Examiner's Report and Decision (November 18, 1999), the Hearing Examiner's Conclusion No. 12 stated that: "The proposed parking at the front of the arts center is inappropriate" and "contradicts and contravenes the spacious setting"; and "to . . . violate the spirit of the code and allow parking in this additional setback would be inappropriate." This Conclusion is apparently based upon the Examiner's conclusion that the code's intent regarding the maximum setback requirement in the CD zone is only to avoid "strip-style development," even at the unique public facility of Renton High School. At the public hearing, Peter Rosen, representing the City of Renton staff, responded to the Hearing Examiner's concerns about the small parking lot on the South 2nd Street side as bringing a "strip commercial aspect" and being a "visual intrusion" by stating to the Hearing Examiner that "from the staffs perspective it [the small parking lot] doesn't really violate that [aesthetic] intent [for the performing arts 2 The citations to the Hearing Transcript in this memorandum refer to a transcription which was prepared by Perkins Coie from the tape recording of the Public Hearing and which therefore is not an"official"Hearing Transcript of the Public Hearing. A copy is attached as Exhibit A. [32012-0805/SB003670.138] -6- 2/7/00 center], and that it's not really an expansive parking that's in front." (Hearing Transcript at 12). Mr. Rosen pointed out to the Hearing Examiner that "[i]t's a fairly narrow [lot]. It's not like you have a large expanse of parking between the street and the building. It's really just a drive lane and one level of angled parking . . . . And you do retain the front, the landscape frontage." (Hearing Transcript at 12). In other words, Mr. Rosen and the Planning Department concluded that the small parking lot will not be visually obtrusive, that it will be screened by landscaping, and that it will not violate the aesthetics of the historic school building or the new Performing Arts Center. The small parking lot on the South 2nd Street side, with 12 parking spaces restricted at all times, will serve a unique public facility and is not an emulation of "strip-style" commercial development that the City of Renton is properly attempting to curtail. The variance is intended to recognize unique situations and not to apply a "one size fits all" approach to code compliance. The small size, the restrictions, and the landscaping of the proposed parking area will not violate the spirit of the code and will not contradict or contravene the spacious setting. E. The proposed small parking lot will provide the closest access to the school building and the Performing Arts Center for parents and persons of disability. In the Hearing Examiner's Report and Decision (November 18, 1999), the Hearing Examiner's Conclusion No. 13 stated that: Since most of the parking for the arts center is located as close, if not closer, on the east of the new addition, reserved accessible or handicapped parking can be located in that eastern lot. In fact, the handicapped parking in the east (student) parking lot would be approximately 200 feet from the closest doors to the school and the Performing Arts Center, while handicapped spaces in the small parking lot on the South 2nd Street side would be approximately 80 feet to the PAC doors. Similarly, handicapped parking spaces in the east (student) parking lot could be as much as 400 feet from the school administration offices in the main building, versus a maximum of 200 feet from the small parking lot on the South 2nd Street side (see attached drawing, Exhibit B).3 3 This drawing includes the Renton High School modernization plan prepared by the Renton School District architects, but this particular plan was not a Hearing Examiner exhibit. The drawing is included for illustrative purposes in connection with the discussion of access issues. [32012-0805/SB003670.138] -7- 2/7/00 At the public hearing, Guy Overman, the School District's architect, testified that: the visitor parking that occurs in the front of the building on 2nd Street is essential for several reasons. You've noted the potential access for handicapped . . . . We are [also] providing this short-term parking in the zone in order for parents to visit administration with an easy in-and-out access to that location. (Hearing Transcript at 20-21). Mr. Overman was emphasizing that the small parking lot on the South 2nd Street side is significantly closer to the school administration offices for parents and disabled persons than is the student parking lot to the rear of the new Performing Arts Center. The Renton High School project design included the small parking lot on the South 2nd Street side to provide easy access for disabled persons and for people being dropped off, as well as for short-term parking. The small parking lot fulfills the Americans with Disabilities ("ADA") and the Renton Municipal Code requirements of making public facilities more accessible to disabled persons, as well as to parents, patrons, and citizens. F. Including the proposed small parking lot with the variance is the "minimum necessary for relief" because Renton High School is unique and because eliminating the parking will be detrimental to the public welfare. In the Hearing Examiner's Report and Decision (November 18, 1999), the Hearing Examiner's Conclusion No. 15 stated that: "The proposed parking pushes the variance limits and is not the minimum necessary for relief." The purpose of a variance is to provide relief in situations of hardship due to unique characteristics of the property, where there is no special privilege that is inconsistent with other property in the vicinity and the public welfare will not be harmed. Renton High School is a unique property within the Center Downtown zone. It is a public facility which is unlike any other within the zone. Building security, student safety, and public accessibility are improved by the creation of the small parking area on the South 2nd Street side. The public welfare will in fact be advanced by including the small parking lot. At the public hearing, Peter Rosen, representing the City of Renton staff, evaluated the proposed variances for the Hearing Examiner with respect to the variance criteria. (Hearing Transcript at 15-18). Mr. Rosen noted, among other things, that the setback variance was necessary because of the undue hardship that would otherwise result due to the special circumstances of the high school's campus [32012-0805/SB003670.138] -8- 2/7/00 setting within the downtown Renton zone. (Hearing Transcript at 15-16). "Staff and applicant feel that the proposed building would be overpowering if located within the required setback distance, and that the dropoff/short-term parking area would need to be eliminated." (Hearing Transcript at 17). In other words, Renton High School is a unique property in downtown Renton,justifying a variance, and eliminating the small parking lot would be detrimental to the public welfare. The small parking lot on the South 2nd Street side is fully within the purposes and criteria for granting an "area variance" from the development standards. The small parking lot is an essential component of the "minimum necessary for relief." Eliminating the small parking lot would be detrimental to the public welfare. G. The proposed small parking lot is an integral part of the School District's setback variance request, along with the setback of the Performing Arts Center to match the original building. In the Hearing Examiner's Report and Decision (November 18, 1999), the Hearing Examiner's Conclusion No. 16 stated that: The reason for this variance is based on the desire to match the generous, open setback on the original building for the new architecturally similar arts center; to allow the grand architectural Gothic Revival style to be viewed as it was meant to be viewed — across an expansive open space. The parking lot is intrusive and it appears to defeat the basis of the variance." In fact, the School District's reason for requesting the setback variance was (1) to match the Performing Arts Center setback with that of the existing Renton High School main building, and (2) to allow for the creation of the small parking area on the South 2nd Street side. Viewing the architecture of the school building is a splendid amenity, but it was not the sole reason for the setback variance. At the public hearing, Guy Overman, the School District's architect, stated to the Hearing Examiner that, while "architectural respect" for the Gothic Revival architecture of the main school building was an important feature of the project, the key consideration of a variance is the impact or hardship that it has on the district. The orientation that I described earlier at circulation is the most efficient approach to aligning this building. If it were pulled forward, the footprint of the building would undoubtedly increase and spend money on bricks and mortar rather than program of the facility . . . . [T]he dropoff access for both the patrons of the theater and the [32012-0805/SB003670.138] -9- 2/7/00 parents of the students . . . will be impacted by moving the building forward. (Hearing Transcript at 22). Thus, while aesthetics was important, the function of the building, the safety concerns and the circulation patterns were the main reasons for the setback variance. Thus, the School District requested the setback variance for the Performing Arts Center for two functional reasons: (1) to match the setback of the existing Renton High School main building, and (2) to allow for the creation of the small, 12-space parking lot on the South 2nd Street side that will facilitate the separation of access and security for the school and the improved accessibility by parents, patrons, and persons of disability to the school building and the Performing Arts Center. Both reasons are integral to the School District's project and the setback variance is essential to both purposes. H. The small parking area on the South 2"d Street side meets all the area variance criteria and therefore should not be eliminated as a condition of the setback variance approval. In summary, there is clear and convincing evidence in the record to support approval of the small parking lot. The project with the small, 12-space parking lot included meets all of the applicable decision criteria for granting an area variance. • Because of the location of Renton High School within the Center Downtown zone, the strict application of the Zoning Code to preclude the small parking area on the South 2nd Street side will create an undue hardship for the School District in preventing implementation of its access separation plan for building security and personal safety. • Permitting the small parking area on the South 2nd Street side will not be injurious to other properties or detrimental to the public welfare. In fact, the parking area's functions will advance the public welfare. • Approving the small parking area on the South 2nd Street side will not be a special privilege relative to other properties because Renton High School is a unique public facility within the Center Downtown zone. • The setback variance including the small parking area is the minimum variance that will accomplish the School District's purposes of reconfiguring building access in the interest of building security and personal safety. [32012-0805/SB003670.138] -10- 2/7/00 See RMC 4-9-250B(5) (decision criteria for granting a variance). There is ample evidence submitted into the Hearing Examiner's record that the small parking area meets all of the variance criteria, and that it is an indispensable element of the remodeling project and of the Variances granted. When on appeal from a Hearing Examiner decision the City Council determines that a substantial error in fact or law exists in the record, the Council may modify, reverse, or remand the decision. RMC 4-8-110F(6). Based on the importance of this 12-space parking lot along South 2nd Street and the evidence and testimony in the record demonstrating that the variance criteria are satisfied, the District respectfully requests that the City Council grant this appeal and restore the small parking area to the Renton High School project. DATED this 7 day of February, 2000. Respectfully submitted, PERKINS COIE LLP By - Richard E. McCann Wayt T. Watterson Attorneys for the Renton School District [32012-0805/SB003670.138] -1 1- 2/8/00 E X H IA s T NOT AN OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT EXHIBIT A TRANSCRIPT RENTON HIGH SCHOOL MODERNIZATION HEARING OCTOBER 26, 1999 Examiner: I'd like to call to order on Tuesday, October 26, 1999 session . My name is Fred Kaufman and I am here to examine City. Sitting by me is Marilyn , she does reporting of public proceedings. Representing Development Services this morning is Peter Rosen, City of Renton. They testified as necessary. Copy of today's agenda is posted outside the Chamber doors. There also should be copy of the agenda and copy of the recommendation to the Examiner available on back credenzas. Whoever has not picked up one of those items they can do that now. The purpose of this meeting is to hold public hearing on the applications pursuant to Ordinance No. 3071. This hearing constitutes the hearing of the City Council. This is the only public hearing to be held on the matter unless the matter discontinues. A brief consideration of Board appeals to the City Council will only consider the evidence submitted today. Unless they request additional time conclusions 14 days in today's hearings. In all replies and these are recommendations to the City Council in all the matters decision I issue is final. Although for the record on today's agenda, our final decisions with the Examiner. You may again ask for reconsideration or appeal. Further information about the appeals and reconsideration procedures is contained in the Examiner's Report. Copies of the Examiner's Report will automatically be sent to all parties of record, that is anybody who in today's hearing will be a party of record and will receive a copy of the report. If you don't testify at today's hearing but would like to become a party of record at the close of the step up and give us your name and address. The procedure we follow is I called the application and those who have to testify today following affirmation. respond I do. At that point Mr. Rosen will go to the preliminary report, after that the applicant and supporting testimony will be permitted. This opposition and request will regarding a request, there'll be an opportunity for that. During the course of the proceeding I may ask questions and again other members of staff may testify as necessary. If there are no unresolved questions the hearing will be closed. If for whatever reason [32012-0806/SB993370.250] 2/9/00 NOT AN OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT there are unresolved questions the hearing will be continued to . As I indicated the hearing is recorded, we ask anybody who testifies to step to the podium, state your name, spell your last name, mailing address including the zip code. If you speak again for whatever reason,just restate your last name so on the tape we can tell who's testifying at that point. This is an administrative hearing. We the strict rules of evidence so please anything you say should be relevant. Please avoid repetitious testimony. The only item on this is land use agenda is the Renton High School Modernization program or project. The file is LUA 099 120. It's a site plan approval (hearing examiner) along with two variances, one for setback and one for landscape shortage standards. The property is located at 11220 NE, that's the school district office. The project itself is located at 400 S 2nd Street in the City of Renton,just off Rainier Avenue. All those who's going to testify please raise your right hand. You've to that now , so answer I do. I do. Examiner: Thank you. Mr. Rosen Rosen: Good morning, Peter Rosen, City of Renton Development Services. Proposals for modernization of the Renton High School. The high school was built and expanded in phases from 1931 through 1969 and there is the existing campus just approximately 25 acres and several buildings that are involved in the proposal. Before I continue I failed to enter Exhibits into the record so I'll go back and do that. Exhibit 1 will be the yellow file which provides proof of publication and posting of the site, another information that is pertinent to the proposal and official information. Exhibit 2 will be the neighborhood detailed map, Exhibit 3 site plan, Exhibit 4 the landscape plan, Exhibit 5 will be the south building elevations, Exhibit 6 will be the SE NW building elevations, Exhibit 7 will be the north building elevations and Exhibit 8 will be the east elevations. Examiner: Thank you, Exhibit no. 1 is the yellow file, 2 the vicinity map, 3 the site plan, 4 landscape plan, no. 5 is the south elevation, no. 6 was the SE and NW elevation, 7 was the north and 8 was the east elevation. Then we can additional exhibits after the meeting. [32012-0806/SB993370.250] -2- 2/9/00 NOT AN OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT Rosen: I have a plan here that is in color but I think it provides just the summary of, I don't have the 8.5 x 11 stuff on the overhead but if I put it up here will you be able to see it, or? Examiner: No. Rosen: Now, why do I that? Examiner: Why don't you let me look,just get a general . . . it will be Exhibit No. 9, whatever it is. Rosen: Okay. What it shows is the . . . in this hatched outline is the existing footprint of the building on the site and what it shows is that the project was moved to east wing of building A which is the main high school building and the east wing extending off the main high school building will be demolished and replaced with the Performing Arts Center which is in the other outline. Also what it shows is that building A would be subject to significant modernization to the interior. I had to go back and say that really the only change in the existing footprints of the building on the site would be the demolition of the east wing of building A and replacement with the Performing Arts Center. What this plan shows us is the levels of modernization that are being proposed to the remainder of the buildings that the main building, building A would have significant modernization, I guess it would be the northwest wing of building A would have to go moderate modernization. Building B which is to the north of building A would undergo minimum modernization to interior mechanical electrical systems update and then building C which is at the very north end of the site oriented toward south Hogen(?) would be converted, would be conversion of classrooms to a warehouse interior and that building would possibly be used for interim classroom starting construction but that would be modified to serve as a central warehouse storage facility at the conclusion of the project. Examiner: Okay. So the only, facade changes also would be minimum facade changes on these other buildings or is it all facade along the building A frontage and I guess, west facade of the building, I mean, east facade of the building, where the performing arts . . . Rosen: I'll let the applicant address the modifications to the facades. Obviously, the Performing Arts Center will be a new facade and my understanding [32012-0806/SB993370.250] -3- 2/9/00 NOT AN OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT is that there will be some facade update of building A, along the south elevation. Is that correct? Applicant: That's correct. We will be . . . Examiner: Why don't I let you testify to that after we get it all in order of the names associated with it. I have trying to ask if this office and the proposal Renton High Interior?? Modernization is really not before us as part of the site plan, I guess. On really discuss the footprint and the facade treatment of the complex, which is basically the performing arts building and the removal of the old east wing, I guess. But I just wanted to ask Payne??? if there is also facade treatment changes that might be at issue and then we can get to that in the course of the process. Applicant: I would add that with Building A in the, I guess it would be the northeast corner of the Building, is an existing boiler room and there is also the large smoke stack that comes up and the smoke stack and the boiler room would be replaced as part of this project. Examiner: Okay. We will probably get to that, because I am not sure I understand the airport's comments and the implications of those comments. Because the smoke stack is 48 feet tall, the building will be 50 feet tall and they wanted the smoke stack gone without a building being there, but it is in a different location as I understand it. So, there is a sloped one-way take-off landing zone that has to be protected or should be protected. And I not sure whether or not the new building does or does not violate that slope off the south ? ? airport. And I am sure Mr. Rosen will get to that to some extent. Applicant: Yeah, we can address that. Also, in terms of circulation there has been some changes and for that I could put up a site plan up on the overhead here. Not incredibly readable, but . . . Examiner: Before we do that, is this represented by one of the site plans that Applicant: Yes. The colored site plan is—this is the equivalent of that site plan. Examiner: Okay. Rosen: It's Exhibit 3. But I wanted to indicate with this is just the changes in circulation and parking that's on the site. Presently buses enter the site off of South 2nd and there is a somewhat of a street that's to the west of the existing high school building A that goes through from South 2nd to [32012-0806/SB993370.250] -4- 2/9/00 NOT AN OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT South Tobin. So buses enter off of South 2„d and they exit off of South Tobin there. And with the proposal what would occur here is basically this would be closed as a through street through the site, and head-in parking is added along the sides there. That's one first changes. I will also note that the applicant is showing a location for four portable classrooms that would be along that corridor. They are not anticipating that portables would be needed, but the proposal does include some undergrounding of communication and electrical connections and so it is part of this proposal and part of the reason for that is so that they wouldn't have to come through the permit process to add portables in the future. Examiner: So there were no portables being proposed at this time that will actually appear on-site? Rosen: That's correct. It basically would be a site plan that would then allow them to add the portables without going through a permit process in the future. Examiner: And let me see if I understand this. The circulation pattern of the buses will now turnaround ... Rosen: Right and come back out the south — I will continue you with the circulation Examiner: Okay. Rosen: So what has been modified then is that now buses will enter off of Logan Avenue and yes there is this turnaround so it's at the very northeast corner of Building A would be located a bus turnaround and with that also there is now they have expanded a parking area that is on the east boundary of the site. That parking area would have access from South 2nd as well from that Logan Avenue south driveway. So that is an expanded parking area that is to serve students and faculty. And then in addition I can focus in on this one area. In addition, they are proposing a drop-off and visitor short-term parking area that would be off of South 2nd street just to the south of both the Performing Arts Center and Building A, so this would be another circulation change here that would allow a pull-off from South 2nd for short-term parking and drop off. As was mentioned, the proposal requires two variances from development standards of the Center Downtown Zone. The Performing Arts Center would exceed the maximum front yard street setback of the CD zone which is 25 feet for buildings over 25 feet in height. The [32012-0806/SB993370.250] -5- 2/9/00 NOT AN OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT Performing Arts Center would be set back approximately 82 feet from South 2nd Street, so you can see on the map here this is the front property line and so they are achieving the maximum setback of the CD zone. In addition, the zone requires a minimum 10-foot wide landscape strip along street frontages and what exists today is a landscape strip along South 2nd Street that is 10 feet in width. You can see that the property line basically bisects the middle of the landscape strip so essentially 5 feet is on the school site property and 5 feet is within the right-of-way. The Code requirement is for an on-site landscape strip, so with only having 5 feet existing on the school property, the School District is asking for a variance from the 10-foot landscape standard, 10- foot wide landscape standard. In terms of environmental review, the Renton School District assumed lead agency for conducting an environmental review and issued a determination of nonsignificance on August 27, 1999, and the appeal period ended September 14 and there were no appeals filed. There were not mitigation measures that were imposed as part of the DNS, so no SEPA environmental mitigation measures are applicable. In terms of consistency with site plan criteria, the first one is conformance with the Comprehensive Plan. The subject site is located in the Center Downtown Comprehensive Plan designation. The policies of the downtown element do not specifically address schools or a Performing Arts Center. However, the total is consistent with the goals and objectives of the downtown element. One of the goals is to foster development of downtown into a revitalized urban center. The Performing Arts Center is intended to be available to the community as well as serve as a school auditorium facility. And its proximity to downtown would provide an amenity that complicates the growing residential population and expansion of businesses downtown and the proximate location to downtown is very appropriate for a cultural arts facility such as the Performing Arts Center. In addition, the modernization of the high school would secure the presence of the school at its existing location of the school campus and I will pull up a vicinity map here because the school campus really serves as a buffer between the more intensive uses of downtown and the north Renton residential neighborhood. Another goal of the downtown element is to promote and improve downtown identity, which is fostered through quality design of three ? ? buildings and amenities and if you look at the elevations of the Performing Arts Center it is consistent with the character of the existing high school building which has historic [32012-0806/SB993370.2501 -6- 2/9/00 NOT AN OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT qualities to it and the building foreman?? and the details and materials would improve the downtown identity. The next criteria is conformance with the existing land use regulations. The site is located in the Center Downtown Zone. As we mentioned, the major change in terms of building footprint would the demolition of the east wing of Building A for the construction of the Performing Arts Center. In terms of the development standards, the lot coverage? of the buildings would be 15.3% and the zone allows for 65%. I have already mentioned the front yard street setback which the Performing Arts Center exceeds the maximum 25-foot setback. We will be discussing that in more detail with discussion of the variance but the reason for placement of the Performing Arts Center is basically to be consistent with the alignment of the existing Building A and I would also note that the Performing Arts Center is actually moved closer to the street than was the east wing. So it is essentially decreasing the level of nonconformity of the existing building. In terms of—there is no side yard setback required in the zone and there is no rear yard setback, except that the CD lot is adjacent to residential designation on the Comp Plan which is the case here. There is residential designation to the north of the site across Tobin, South Tobin Street. But the zoning administrator has determined that because the proposal is not affecting that portion of the site, the site is over 25 acres and particularly the activities are really focused on the south portion of the site, so the zoning administrator determined that the landscape setback would not apply along the north property boundary. Examiner: But the change to the use and I know that I said that interior changes weren't really significant as far as site plan review, will the deliveries of materials, foods to a warehousing-type storage area at the north end of the site, affect that or will it be occurring sort of through the bus circulation pattern? In other words, will there be more hub-bub at the north facade of the building where landscaping might help buffer that type of use? Rosen: I will have the applicant address how deliveries would occur there. I would also add, I didn't bring a zoning map along with me, but if you go out to the site along South Tobin there right across from the site it is really not residential in character. It is largely—there is quite a mix of uses there, so its far from being—it is not really residential. I will put up the zoning map here which what it shows is that there is residential zoning across Tobin on the northeast part of the school site. On the northwest part of the school, on the south side of Tobin, there is also a [32012-0806/SB993370.250] -7- 2/9/00 NOT AN OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT little row of single-family zoning, but then on the north side of Tobin there is commercial zoning. But there is quite a mix of uses along south Tobin. There is offices, multi-family; so it is not strictly single-family uses along there. Examiner: The tennis courts are located sort in the north-central part of the site? Rosen: That's correct. The tennis courts would be located approximately in this area of the site. Examiner: No, they are on Tobin, I know that. At least some of them are, I think. Rosen: Oh, yeah; okay, I am sorry, they are in this portion of the site right here. Examiner: I'll have to express the fact that I know the site; I have walked past the site a number of times in the past, not only just for this review. Rosen: Okay. In terms of landscaping, we have discussed the requested variance for along the street frontage of South 2nd Street. The CD Zone also requires a 15-foot landscaped visual barrier where a commercial lot is abutting . . . Discussion Okay this is the zoning map, not the Comp Plan. Do you want that too? This is the zoning map and that is what we are referencing for this purpose. The CD zone requires a 15-foot wide landscaped visual barrier where a commercial lot is abutting property zoned residential, so you can see at the very northwest corner of the School District property there is a small row of single-family zoned and it is largely single-family housing there. On the School District site there are athletic fields that are abutting that zoning and they would not be affected at all by what's being proposed here. Again, the zoning administrator determined that this zoning standard would not apply to that unaffected portion of the site considering that the large majority of the proposal is focused on the south portion of the site. Examiner: And these are not variances then, these are . . . Rosen: No. These are basically determinations by the zoning administrator, not written. Examiner: Not written? Why aren't they variances from the Code requirements? Rosen: I am sorry? [32012-0806/SB993370.250] -8- 2/9/00 NOT AN OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT Examiner: Why aren't they variances from Code requirements? Why is the 10-foot landscape strip along the frontage a variance and why are these not variances? Rosen: Well, what we looked at in making that determination is basically the affected portions of the site and there is precedence here for with other large sites that have been in the city for instance with the Boeing site where they are doing something on a portion of the interior of the site. There is residential abutting an adjacent to the Boeing site and we don't require them to put in a landscaped strip along the unaffected portions of the site. So there is some precedence there and what was evaluated was where the focus of the activity is being proposed. In terms of building height, the maximum building height of the CD zone is 95 feet. This property also has a P-suffix which is really not applicable to this proposal. It allows 15 feet of height of additional height permitted above the underlying zone, provided that pitched roofs are used. The proposal—the maximum height of the building would be 56 feet, so it is under the allowed height of the zone so it really doesn't need any kind of what the P-suffix would provide. Examiner: Could you point out on the elevation drawings the 54 foot and the 56 foot of the penthouse? Rosen: Yeah. Okay, this is the top height of the Performing Arts Center roof right here, which is 54 feet 3 inches. And then the penthouse is basically a part—it's behind the clock??, it's behind Building A and that would be 56 feet 3 inches. I would note that the existing front parapet of Building A is 6 feet 8 inches. So, they wouldn't be building up to the highest level that exists. Examiner: Does anybody know the airport's view on this? Rosen: The airport was very pleased that they are removing the smoke stack. There are memos in the file to that effect. Examiner: That I know; I have read that. But they also indicate that, again, that slope that takes off from the airport and rises. Because they say it is not consistent across the site and obviously it is not because the site is fairly deep. I just want—obviously the new structures are not going to be taller than the parapet, but I am trying to figure out if there is any nonconformity. I imagine the FAA will intervene if there is any kind of problems . . . [32012-0806/SB993370.250] -9- 2/9/00 NOT AN OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT Rosen: That's correct. My understanding, well I don't know if this is in the horizontal area which the concern is 179 feet above sea level is what the concern is there. I don't know if this is actually closer in to the airport than that zone or not. But the only comments that we did receive from the airport was that there pleased with the fact that they are removing the smoke stack and the fact that the Performing Arts Center is below the height of the existing school facade there were no comments as to the height of the new construction. In terms of parking, there is presently 289 spaces of parking on the site. The proposal would add 167 parking spaces in that, principally along the east parking lot that I indicated. I would add that that presently serves as a parking lot; it is just being expanded. You can see the outline of the east wing that's being removed to allow for expansion of that parking area, and then there'd be additional parking that is added along that corridor that's to the west of the buildings. So there'd be a total of 456 parking spaces. The parking code regulations require one space per employee plus one space per ten students; should add also that there is a parking requirement for busses only if they're kept at the site, and the school district does not keep the busses at the facility, though there is some bus parking area provided near the turnaround for the busses. The environmental checklist estimates 90 to 100 staff persons at the school site with approximately a thousand full-time students, and the maximum design capacity of the school is 1,400 students; accordingly there would be 230 to 240 parking spaces required under the parking code. The performing art center has 549 fixed seats, and parking regulations would require one space per four fixed seats or 138 spaces. So, if you added that to the 240 it would be 378, so the amount of parking still exceeds all the uses, the sum of all those uses. It is anticipated that public events at the Performing Arts Center would occur in the evening, and would not overlap with the school parking needs. The applicant has requested a parking modification because the number of proposed spaces exceeds the number that's required, and parking modifications are a decision of the Administrator of Planning Building Public Works. We haven't forwarded the parking modification to the administrator at this point yet any decision on that. Examiner: And uh, I'm not sure of this, but this site is outside of the exempt area? I know that certain areas downtown do require . . . Rosen: That's correct. It's outside of the downtown core. Just outside I should add. [32012-0806/SB993370.250] -10- 2/9/00 NOT AN OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT Examiner: something. Rosen: Yes. Right. Logan and Examiner: I wasn't sure where that ran, but. Rosen: Yeah. In terms of the plan criteria's mitigation of impacts to surrounding properties and uses, the modernization renovation of the school buildings is not expected to adversely impact surrounding properties. It's a large 28-acre campus, and buildings that are proposed for major renovation are not immediately adjacent to surrounding uses. The only change that we noted is along S. 2nd for the Performing Arts Center. Discuss the changes in bus and vehicle circulation patterns on the site, there would be the new entry off of S. Logan, and there are single-family residences that are abutting Logan that would be abutting the east property line of the school district site. I would add that those are basically non-performing uses to the zone in that single-family residences are not. It's zoned CD, so there are existing single-family residences, but they are not conforming to the zone. In order to, what the environmental checklist, it estimates that there'd be approximately 300 primary vehicle trips per day, 200 diverted link or by-pass trips per day. Staff is recommending that, the school district has provided a landscape strip between the parking lot and the adjacent residents or abutting residences actually, and its been, the planting plan shows deciduous shade trees and some shrubs and staff are recommending a condition that the applicant revise the landscape plan to provide for better screening of the parking area from the backyards of those residences. The next criteria is mitigation of impacts of the proposed site plan to the site. As I mentioned there are only minor changes to the footprints to the existing buildings. The proposal would improve circulation on the site by eliminating that through street to the west, or through corridor to the west of the existing buildings. Also the addition of the drop off area and, would be an improvement to the circulation on the site. Presently there is a very small pull off in front of the school site for, that's used for loading and unloading, and this would allow people to actually pull off of S. 2nd Street unto the school property. Examiner: Is this also going to provide parking or just pull off? Rosen: It provides short-term parking as well as pull out. [32012-0806/SB993370.250] -1 1- 2/9/00 NOT AN OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT Examiner: I guess the question I have probably involves this and coupled with the variances, the concept of the CD zone, and while the site may not be appropriately considered, it's obviously in the zone, is to avoid the strip commercial aspect. Bring the building closer to the street. Avoid parking in front of the building, doesn't this kind of violate that premise in the good site design plans, shouldn't be at least, um . . . ? Rosen: Well, if you look at along south, the context of this site in terms of it being a large school campus as well as a, the appearance of the building is obviously a public facility, and really the intent of that code standard for the CD zone is to create a pedestrian district in the CBD in the commercial area of downtown. Although this falls within its, it's to the North end of it, and um, there's on the north side of S. 2nd Street, there's really no businesses that fronts the street. Examiner: asking for the aesthetic purposes of the zone, which away, make sure the streetscape looks pretty nice, either, hopefully nice commercial building or store front, or in this case, the performing arts theater, and doesn't this parking area, pull off area, isn't it a visual intrusion into what otherwise looks like a fairly well designed site plan. Rosen: It's a fairly narrow. It's not like you have a large expanse of parking between the street and the building. It's really just a drive lane and one level of angled parking, so I don't know exactly what the dimension is, but it's probably somewhere like 45 feet wide, or possibly less. And you do retain the front, the landscape frontage, and so, from staffs perspective it doesn't really violate that intent, and that it's not, it's not really an expansive parking that's in front. The proposal does add a significant amount of landscaping and improve the student court yard area between Buildings A and B as. Just shown on the site plan. There are several existing large redwood trees that are in front of the entry to the school, and the applicant has indicated the removal of those redwood trees being necessary for the modernization and for the work on the , and staff is just urging the school district to attempt to preserve these large specimen trees if possible. The next criteria is conservation of area-wide property values. The modernization and renovation would conserve or improve area-wide property values. The next criteria is safety and efficiency of vehicle and pedestrian circulation. We've already discussed the circulation changes and a staff [32012-0806/SB993370.250] -12- 2/9/00 NOT AN OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT analysis of it, that, is that the proposal would improve the overall circulation on the site. That what's being proposed is a positive for both vehicle and pedestrian circulation. The next criteria is provision for adequate light and air. And there are adequate set backs and distances between existing and proposed buildings to allow for adequate light and air to reach the buildings. The next one is mitigation of noise, odors and other harmful or unhealthy conditions. The proposal would not result in noise, odors or other harmful and unhealthy conditions. The construction activities would generate noise; however, construction hours are limited by city code and the construction activity would be temporal in nature. The terms of the next criteria is availability of public services and facilities. There are adequate public services and facilities to accommodate the proposed school modernization and the Performing Arts Center. The applicant will be required to bring the building into compliance with present fire and building codes with renovation of the buildings. Examiner: There was some question about the service to the site that will be done, I guess that's required by code? Rosen: Yes. That would be done as required by code, and can be accomplished. It's nothing that would be really a constraint in terms of the ability to serve that site. We have Anita from Plan Review who could address that further if you wish. The last criteria is prevention of neighborhood deterioration and blight. As I mentioned before, the modernization of the high school would secure the presence of the school at its existing campus location and it's considered that the presence of the high school and the addition of the Performing Arts Center in the downtown area would serve to prevent neighborhood deterioration and blight. Staff recommends approval of the Renton High School Modernization Project; the site plan, with the condition that the applicant revise the landscaped plantings along the east property boundary to better provide visual screening of the parking area from the abutting single-family residences. That the revised landscape plan should be subject to the approval of development services division prior to issuance of building permits. [32012-0806/SB993370.250] -13- 2/9/00 NOT AN OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT Examiner: Might a wall be an appropriate buffer also? Currently, I assume not that much occurs in the evening hours off the east end of the building, and the Performing Arts Center with its, what is it, 150-car parking lot or whatever the parking complex is over there, will be getting out, I would presume there would be evening performances on Fridays and Saturdays ' if not Thursdays, that might, and I realize the zoning is a little suspect on the west east edge of the complex, but still there are single-family homes and people getting in and out of cars is always something that disturbs residential neighbors, engines starting, doors slamming? Rosen: Well the, a large portion of the parking is closer to the Performing Arts Center. You would assume that people would park as close as possible, and so, it would be away from those properties. Seems like its more of a visual issue then it is noise, and that frequently, residences would prefer a landscape screen as opposed to a solid wall along their back property, which is what the staff is recommending on that. I'll go into the two variances now. Examiner: This is the hard part. Rosen: It is? The first one is for the maximum front yard street set back. The zone requires a maximum set back of 25 feet for buildings over 25 feet in height. And the Performing Arts Center would be set back 82 feet from the front property line, which obviously exceeds the maximum set back requirement. As we noted, the existing high school building exceeds the maximum set back standard. And the east wing of the building that the Performing Arts Center is <<end of side 1 of tape 1>> further; so, the Performing Arts Center would decrease the level of nonconformity with maximum set back standard. And uh, I think I've already explained the landscape standard [interrupted] Examiner: Okay, where is? Is it across the entire facade, or is just by that parking area? Why can't they comply? Rosen: The landscape standard? Examiner: Yeah. Rosen: Basically its an existing condition. And, in order to comply, they would have to replace the entire existing sidewalk along the entire frontage of the property. Add five feet of landscaping and replace the sidewalk. [32012-0806/SB993370.250] -14- 2/9/00 NOT AN OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT And, staff thinks that to correct that nonconforming condition is really incommensurate with the project proposal, and that would essentially pose a hardship. In terms of the decision criteria for the [interrupted] Examiner: Okay. So the current sidewalk is on the subject site as opposed to on the right of way? Rosen: That is correct. The first variance criteria is that the applicant suffers undo hardship. The variance is necessary because of special circumstances applicable to the subject property including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings of the subject property and that the strict application of the zoning code is found to deprive the subject property owner of rights and privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity and under identical zone classification. In terms of the front yard street set back standard, the new Performing Arts Center, besides being used for some community events, it is intended to replace the existing auditorium in the school. There is obviously a need to link the Performing Arts Center with the high school building in terms of programming and functions as well as a need for a linkage for the ancillary support systems of the buildings. And this necessitates locating the new building along a corridor and access that is consistent with the existing high school building. Examiner: But if you rotated 45 degrees toward the street, you'd at least have less of a variance need. Right now its sort of set as a diamond to 2nd. If you rotated it 45 degrees toward the street so the connecting corridor became a straight line. Obviously, I'm not making myself clear. Instead of being a diamond, yeah, we could have a square with the façade straight onto S. 2nd. Aesthetically it wouldn't be as nice. I'm having problems. That's why I said it would be difficult. We have enough area. It's very hard to justify variances and to show undo hardship, cause I don't want to create a precedence, and we have turned down other variances, not necessarily for anything quite this large. Rosen: Well, you have to show undue hardship based on special circumstances of the property. And the staff believes that there are special circumstances in terms that this is a large school campus, it's an institutional setting, and really the additional set back is justified in terms of the height of the buildings, and it would be, the building being 54 feet it could really be overpowering if located within the [interrupted] [32012-0806/SB993370.250] -15- 2/9/00 NOT AN OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT Examiner: Except the CD zone allows us 95-foot tall building right on the 10-foot set back or 25-foot set back. Rosen: Yes, again though that is really zoning that is intended for the CBD where you have the buildings, where you have a continuous line of buildings that is intended to be right up to the street frontage. And, again, this is a school campus, and to really showcase the architecture and the appearance, it's viewed better set back further from the street. That's staffs opinion on it and also the applicant's. Examiner: Do we have any historic regulations? Rosen: We don't have historic regulations. So really, we consider the setting for the overall site and the size of it and the size of the building and the function to be the special circumstance that's associated with this property that justifies a variance from the maximum set back. As well, if it was to comply with the maximum set back, it would eliminate the front drop off short-term parking area, and our transportation and review staff has indicated that, that as being beneficial for and being favorable over the current situation which is just a very small pull off, off S. 2nd. This, especially with a Performing Arts Center. This would be an improvement. That would have to be eliminated to bring the building into compliance with the maximum set back. Examiner: Could we limit that drop off area to handicapped access which might create more of a special circumstance? Rosen: I think that, I don't think there would be. I don't think there's anything in terms of the city's position that would be troublesome of limiting that. I don't know if the school district might have some concerns about that. Examiner: testify. Rosen: Yep. Then to discuss the landscape standard under this criteria. As I mentioned, the applicant would have to tear out the existing sidewalk to install additional landscape with the only new work in this area is the addition of the drop off lane and short-term parking, so basically you have an existing non-conforming condition, and also, it would basically offset the sidewalk from the other, the alignment of the sidewalk along S. 2nd. So, staff considers the existing condition of the site to present a [32012-0806/SB993370.250] -16- 2/9/00 NOT AN OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT special circumstance and that correcting that non-conforming condition would present a hardship that's in commensurate with the project proposal. The second criteria is the granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is situated. Under the front yard street set back, the granting of the variance would not be materially detrimental to public welfare or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity. The approval of the variance for the new Performing Arts Center structure would maintain a set back that's consistent with the existing 68-year old high school structure, and the existing set back and building location are appropriate for the scale and proportion and architecture of the building. Urn, as mentioned previously, staff and the applicant feel that the proposed building would be overpowering if located within the required set back distance, and that the drop off short-term parking area would need to be eliminated. That would be detrimental to student and public use of the facilities. In terms of the landscape standard, the granting of the variance would allow for the retaining of the existing sidewalk and landscape configuration. If landscape were expanded, the sidewalk would be off set from existing alignment only on the school property, and this could pose a hazard or an inconvenience to pedestrian and vehicle safety. So, therefore, the variance would not be materially detrimental to public welfare or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity. Criteria three is that the approval shall not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with limitation upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is situated. The school campus is a setting that's unlike any other neighboring property. The historic nature of the school buildings and the building scale that in proportion to the site merit special consideration. Therefore, approval of a variance would not constitute a grant of special privilege. For the landscape standard, the applicant is, again, is requesting a variance simply to retain the existing non-conforming condition. The proposal does not include, does not require any street right of way improvements, and so therefore, there's no requirement to modify this area of the site. I should add that we analyzed, staff was analyzing this in terms of whether there is a code threshold for when a site development or modification to an existing building or site is required to [32012-0806/SB993370.250] -1 7- 2/9/00 NOT AN OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT bring a nonconforming landscape standard up to compliance with the code. And there really is nothing in the code. The only analogues situation is in the parking code, which if you have a nonconforming parking situation, it would require an expansion of the building over one-third of what's existing for a development to have to comply with the code requirement. So, if you were to use that as a similar threshold in this case, obviously the proposal is not expanding the existing high school over one-third. If you were to use the same logic, they wouldn't have to bring the landscape standard up to conformity. The last criteria is the approval is a minimum variance that will accomplish the desired purpose. The new performing arts center is proposed in alignment with the existing and nonconforming 1931 high school structure. As I mentioned the alignment is necessary for connection of facility systems as well as to connect the function of the high school and the performing arts center/auditorium. The requested front yard set back variances is a minimal variance necessary to accomplish the desired purpose of adding a drop off short-term parking area and aligning the performing arts center with the alignment of the existing school building. In terms of the landscape standard, the variance would allow for continuation of the existing condition of the landscape strip and sidewalk. As I mentioned the code doesn't include the threshold for when expansion or renovation requires correcting of nonconforming conditions. The applicant is not requesting a lesser standard for new construction,just to maintain what is existing and the configuration of the existing landscape strip and sidewalk are consistent along the entire block. Therefore, what's being proposed is a minimum variance from the landscape standard and the staff recommends approval of both of the variance request. Thank you. The applicant or representative? If someone can step to the where Mr. Rosen was speaking. Give us your name, spell your last name, give us a mailing address for staff report to go. Overman: My name is Guy Overman. I'm with Northwest Architectural Company. I'm the architectural project manager on this project. The company address is 2201 6th Avenue, Suite 1405, Seattle, WA 98121-1832. Examiner: Thank you. Overman: I'd like to cover some of the issues that were brought up in Peter's discussion and background project. I sure would like to cover them in the order of discussion. My first concern or issue was the façade [32012-0806/SB993370.250] -18- 2/9/00 NOT AN OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT development. I like to elaborate on that issue. The existing 1931 Gothic Revival architectural style of the building was to be respected as part of the design program. Our intent to designing the project was to integrate with that architecture but as part of it we needed to functionally upgrade the façade to give it an extended life, 30-40 years. In doing so we needed to replace the windows on the façade with historically accurate but more technologically functional window profiles that will keep the building from deteriorating over time. The brick work on the façade needs to be examined and analyzed by our structural engineers to make sure they will be restrained in a seismic event. As part of that the brick work likely needs to be tuck pointed upgraded. One of the concerns we have relative to that issue is the location of these redwood trees at the, their positioned right here on either side of the entry. They are extremely close to the foundation of this building in order to ensure that this building will last the extended 30-40 years that is anticipated by the program and quite possible longer than that, 50-70 years. It's our recommendation that these trees be removed. They are, I'm sure from the original architect's design intent overscale at this point, they are overgrown, and the root system on trees of this size is pretty much a reflection of the height of the tree and the distribution of the root system puts significant pressure on foundation and is potentially degrading it. The other concern we have with these trees is that these tuck pointing and upgrade of the seismic upgrade of the façade could be compromised in terms of safety for the construction team to perform these operations of these trees at a minimum would have to be cut back significantly in order to accomplish these operations in a safe efficient manner and that would potentially damage the trees irreparably and our concept for this location is to remove the trees and replace them with a tall linear type tree in a similar location. The architecture pretty much demands that with the original intent of the original architect and we want to respect that but we wanted to put in a proper perspective and scale rather than the overgrown condition that exists. The next issue I wanted to respond to was the concern about loading access with the new function of a warehouse. I'd like to use this machine, I'd like to focus on that area if we could. This controlled access loading zone relative to the development of this building as a central warehouse and food storage facility is actually an issue that will not change the delivery frequency that currently exists at the school. The Renton High School is a central food facility for the district. As part of our program is we are to upgrade the system in Building B to be more efficient as a central food facility but the frequency of delivery to the satellite facilities in the district would not [32012-0806/SB993370.250] -19- 2/9/00 NOT AN OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT change. The improvement that we are addressing here is a controlled access of the loading zone or back of the house of the facility to keep students out of the zone and provide a safer environment. It should be noted that the existing district warehouses is no less than a half a block away from this location so the impact to the immediate neighborhood is essentially no different. Moving on to other issues, the safe intent in general. We have several issues that we wanted to accomplish. entire safe line. Examiner: Mr. Rosen, maybe you can show him how to use this so he can go up and down if he needs to. Overman: Our initial criteria for the design of this safe plan was first and foremost to provide separation of access. We have five separate types of traffic that it was essential that we separate to provide a safer and smoother access to the building. The current access to the building is pretty much focused along this thru driveway here and represents substantial chaos at this point. The buses arrive and go through this access, the loading operation occurs in the back through this access here, the student parking occurs in this zone over here providing access at that location. Examiner: By that you refer to the Tobin. Overman: Right. And staff parking in this zone here is also impacted by this through development. Examiner: Off of 2nd. I'm just doing that because the tape doesn't reflect where you're pointing to so I just try and clarify locations. Overman: Thank you, I understand. Anyway, our concern that this created a very disruptive and very unsafe circumstance and it was our goal to separate access for these different functions. The current arrangement or proposed arrangement for access is the staff parking is deadended here, is controlled gate access necessary for the Fire Department to provide flow through at the center of this roadway but on day-to-day basis the controlled access on this west side of the school will provide for staff parking in the zone and provide that it's access off of 2nd Street and exited off of 2nd Street. The Visitor Parking that occurs in the front of the building on 2nd Street is essential for several reasons. You've noted the potential access for handicap, I think this is an excellent use for this, however, we would like to provide a limited number of parking spaces in there because in this corner of the building, which is the northwest corner of the building. [32012-0806/SB993370.250] -20- 2/9/00 NOT AN OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT Examiner: Southwest. Overman: You're correct. Southwest is the main administration function of the building. I was stressed when I visited this site originally when we did our interview and was determined that this historic entry to the building is practically dysfunctional. They might as well have locked the door. I'm sure that wasn't the original intent for the architect and because of the change in society to a more of automobile oriented circulation the reason ifs not used is there's not direct access to that entry through the automobile. We are providing this short-term parking in the zone in order for parents to visit administration an easy in-and-out access to that location, we're developing a new entry on the lower side, actually on the main floor level of this facility, this new access point beneath the stairs will come directly from the parking. Without that direct access this original entrance of the building will once again become dormant and we find that to be something that doesn't respect the historic architecture of the building. That covers the visitor access. The other parking that we have in this zone here is for student access. • The consolidation of the floor plan of the building was essential to create essential point for students to access the building. This is a security consideration and is part of the program. The entrance occurs right here between the performing arts center and building A. Now it was our intent to provide the major access for students in this parking zone and students that arrive by bus to be at the same location since they all enter that particular entrance. But we did not want to integrate the bus traffic with the student traffic for obvious reasons. There's conflict there. So we provided bus access off of Logan and is dedicated for that purpose. The student access comes off on 2nd Street. This entrance off of Logan Street is in fact an existing parking entrance for staff currently so we're not redeveloping this access. It already exists. So loading operation is described either, the earlier was separated intentionally and is access off Tobin Street, there is also staff and potentially student overflow parking off Tobin Street. All these different parking zones create good public good of the site. We have additional parking in this zone for access to the tennis courts here as well as parking on 2nd Street which is more dedicated to public use of the fields, softball fields. The next issue I'd like to cover involves the variance considerations. The orientation of the performing arts center is rotate as such for several reasons. First and foremost, direct access from the school building A is [32012-0806/SB993370.250] -21- 2/9/00 NOT AN OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT at this location where the main student entrance is. The more formal public access to the Community Theatre is at the front of the building, in the drop-off zone off 2nd Street. These two access points created a dynamic with the theater located in the center and internally we don't have floor plans of this but the theater is rotated on this 45-degree angle and has two entrances at the corners. The access from the school is one entrance, the access from the street is the other. A symbolism of community, harmony with the district is actually integrated with the rotation of this design. The other purpose of its rotation is this corner over here on Logan Avenue and 2nd Street is the point of which the central business district urban center ties into that corner. The orientation to that corner as you can see by a private development to the south of the high school is also toward that center. We intend to use similar light fixtures, similar paving patterns, it's part of our attempt to integrate with the Downtown redevelopment. ? If I could add, what he's referencing to. improvements that were done on Logan Avenue, street trees and the fixtures. Overman: Hence, the orientation of this site of the performing arts center to the school relative to the setback issue would be disrupted by maintaining the required setback of 25 feet. As Peter noted earlier, the drop-off access for both the patrons of the theater and the parents of the students, the main entrance to the building will be impacted by moving the building forward. The architectural respect that I discussed earlier, the Gothic revival architecture demands that the tower on the main building be the most dominant feature of the complex. By moving performing arts center forward, that dominance due to everybody's prospectives of visualization of the building is pulled out of balance and is disrespectful to the main tower. The key consideration though of a variance is the impact or hardship that it has on the district. The orientation that I described earlier at circulation is the most efficient approach to aligning this building. If it were to be pulled forward the footprint of the building would undoubtedly increase and spend money on bricks and mortar rather than program of the facility. It was our intent to maximize the money for the educational program. The landscape variance on the sidewalk relative to the 10-ft. requirement is an issue that we feel again is a hardship to the taxpayers' efficient use of the bond money. This sidewalk exists at this location, the orientation of the sidewalk is familiar to the community, the movement of that sidewalk since it's not being impacted by construction is an expense that should not be a high priority when we are truly [32012-0806/SB993370.250] -22- 2/9/00 NOT AN OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT attempting to develop this facility utilizing every dollar possible for the education program. Examiner: I understand that, unfortunately and you're probably aware of this being an architect. In this case, economics is not a justification for a variance but I'll consider the other issues that were raised, certainly. Overman: Ok. I believe I've covered most of the issues that were discussed. Were there issues you wanted me to respond to specifically? Examiner: Well, I've raised the Airport and I have a feeling I'll obviously defer to them unless you know more about that. Overman: No, that is a good point. I appreciate you reminding me of that. The existing smoke stack is probably the height presentation. Examiner: Well there's the height of the smoke stack and then there's the height above sea level and those are sort of mixed. Overman: Right. The height of the smoke stack, the 40 feet smoke stack is really the height above as it comes out of the building itself So the relative height of the site. It is the total of element on the site, taller than the 66-ft. tower, which is the tallest portion of the architecture of the building aside from the smoke stack, so there's 40 feet as really described in the stack itself and the fact that it comes out of the boiler building which is on the, which is a two-story building itself is what's here. So by removing the smoke stack it is a significant reduction in the height of the entire building and as the Airport has recognized the increased safety issue. The other issue your Honor has reminded me is the issue of this landscape request by Zoning Department to improve the landscaping into the Logan Avenue residences that are nonconforming use. Examiner: I think staff is generally concerned with using deciduous trees as a buffer since they lose their leaves in the winter time and prevent, at least provide no visual barricade, never mind the sound performance of any kind of tree. Overman: That is understandable and I think we can amend the type of landscaping that we put in there to improve the circumstance. However, we are concerned about being a good neighbor to these residences. This [32012-0806/SB993370.250] -23- 2/9/00 NOT AN OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT existing fence is right up the property line and has no setback currently. It is a parking lot existing so it's not to say that when they bought these houses that they weren't aware of the circumstance and we're not changing that circumstance. However, in our attempt to improve the situation for them we have pulled the parking lot back to provide a landscape buffer there. I believe the ordinances relative to buffers discuss the possibility of 15 feet of landscaping for a 5-ft landscape zone with a solid barrier. Examiner: That would be were commercial property that's the residential zone. So that standard wouldn't apply. Overman: That's good(?) and in the spirit of that, we are proposing this landscape setback of 5 feet and we are willing to put a solid barrier on the fence. I do think this has the potential to block headlights at an evening event and would probably help mitigate the sound. What we would like to do is the chainlink fencing that exists in these areas putting solid slats— cedar slats—in the fencing to create this visual barrier would be our proposal along with carnivorous-type vegetation that would year round be a buffer. That's what we feel is a fair and equitable response to this adjacency. Examiner Thank you. Is there further testimony in support of the application? Okay. I will wait for City Staff. Woman: Okay. Examiner: Is there further testimony in support from anybody other than the applicant or City Staff? Is there any testimony in opposition to the request? If not, why don't we have City Staff testify. Thank you. [End of Tape 1, side 2] [Begin Tape 2, side 1] Knokes: I am Betty Knokes, Economic Development Director for the City, and I have been very involved in the performing arts center project and actually out promoting that in the community. A couple of things have come up as we were out marketing the project. The first thing was that we were able to with the design of the building have the cost only be $1.5 million for the performing arts center project; where like in Kent for the same kind of project, it is $15 million. So the whole goal was to be able to tie it to a joint use so the school can use—it could be a [32012-0806/SB993370.250] -24- 2/9/00 NOT AN OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT magnet program for the arts, but the public could also use it without having different configurations, different doors, those kinds of things. The other thing that we are finding out and we have had I believe about $225,000 of commitments and most of those are $1,000 or less signing? commitments from the public. Everybody has been very interested in maintaining a campus environment. They like the setting of Renton High School. There has been a lot of discussion to make sure the parking is close to the facility, especially for people that you know that can't go that far for walking distances. So those are some of things that came up right from the very beginning and I think that how it has been presented at least these diagrams are what we have been promoting to when we take it out, they have been very much in favor of both the landscaping being more than normally allowed, the building being set back further. Guy did mention to you that they are picking up the street- scape feeling for the downtown, so they will be tying that into the project so that we will make connections to the revitalization that we are doing. Examiner: Thank you. ? do you have anything? Man/Heninger?: The only issue I really raise was the water mains. There may be some other issues public works has on driveways and other things like that. Woman: In wishing to address your concern about the water main, this was an issue that Plan Review?? had discussed with the Applicant early on in the process, and it can be handled very easily during the normal plan review process. A water main extension may be required and that will easily be discussed and handled during the regular planning review for this project. Heninger?: The driveway curve cuts that are appropriate? Woman: I do not have any concerns about those items at this time. Examiner: Okay. Woman: A full plan review will be handled later on in the project. Examiner: Is there any further testimony? I will ask for some additional time, but I think the report will be out in a timely fashion, but I will ask for some additional time. Mr. Rosen??/quist? [32012-0806/SB993370.250] -25- 2/9/00 NOT AN OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT Rosen: Just wanted to add one comment about the parking area in the front. There are 12 compact stalls and the width of that area is essentially 45 feet, 48 feet. Examiner: Thank. Thank you for your patience and I am glad we were able to accommodate this one after the first hearing this morning. [End Tape 2, side 1] [32012-0806/SB993370.250] -26- 2/9/00 CO wxx-m-I- ' novi,w.10 > Exhibit B --1',---------- ,----- �_ .-N.. - -- ------ -- - NOTES II. i : l �l ' If' { ! { ' '. .. I I- _ w c=- ■uanNo c I r I ' 1 I -- �•., � I O 1 . Proposed small parkinglot on the South 2nd Street side 4- '1 . -4 �' .---- - = - . - — --- ——I _ -4 w p 1 , �rrr _ _ > of the Renton High School and PerformingArts Center. }' r ' x--•^ 0 -. " ;�" — 1 U' g 1 ,- y _ 11 0 �' i t �a? n I i _; 1 r z 2. Proposed student parking (and Performing Arts Center "' 1 ,.�� : �==' .w-. �''.' ��-� { parking) lot of the east side of the Renton High School ` � �" ,;Y --�-- 1 _ 1 ••••••• ...„.")campus. 1 `" - { V 1 \ ,' / 1: 3. Student entrance to the Renton High School, and access =I:.», s� I. T ��y , // "�•� ' �� � . . to the Performing Arts Center from the parking lot, after ''-T�`\``-- _.°-.., '""""`°"'�°" mairmit�` /; __ I ----� the modernization project. �' '/% �r- A I_ ""ia 1 r k :•111:4 / School, for '" 111. ''�'� - -- 1 k 4. Front (tower) entrance to the Renton High ' ==' �''�'�' a' 1 '= 'i • 1 77 parents and visitors. .•`�° •' : •ll , •� iiiiippr____ _ ___ :r;r' fir. •, .7 , % .•� •i 5. Front entrance to the Performing Arts Center for proposed • 4 '''�'"'''�'' ""°" -- _ i I, , dropoff and handicapped parking. ' 1 f er:i ,.*K. t x — , '„ 6. Proposed Performing Arts Center addition. -::::t "'•' - .•.••. ,> . , �..._- -_J U t- 7. Administration area of the Renton High School. - • ,� �` r — /; '' . ,..„, .....1 -1 I § x-.4 �....V.V.*/ �'.!•• •• • 1 -� 8. Access from the handicapped spaced in the student �" '' "�'''• �� '�' 6 N Di► a:'? .. . • ,,�1 -..... •••� ... �: + — , / O lic • parking lot--approximately 200 feet to the closest doors j , . T.,...• - -� p . to the school and the PerformingArts Center and �O a 4. _J-k eU11J»+ci n�lr�lallmo .+. —] tr= i a s i' approximately 400 feel from the school administration offices. , -t...1-�� t_ �w �^ (P ) h -' r.9. Access from the handicapped spaces in the proposed small -� `= _ _ , -_-_ _ •'• R-I ; ' �__ , 1,�T parking lot on the South 2nd Street side--approximately 80 I i_-,a- 1,,.. VW:+J • feet to the front entrance to the PerformingArts Center and • - • • • 1i approximately 200 feet from the school administration offices. >, :, — .... ....1 J _� �'' 1 South 2nd Street .ice. ....^. >� `• -----M W T. -- --_ "— , , �� � ��`, ! � 1 �.,� ,'y{/�' ICI b 1 � I � , , ��` ..a.n)-qo•i (.2) :W 1 2Or ,. 3 1 r ,w; 0y, 1 J) 1o,.. 1o .. p. • reLdival a• . .O 0 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY el " /24 y 1800 COLUMBIA CENTER, 701 5TH AVE, SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104 Order No.: 537484 Unit: U-10 Property Address:WASHINGTON Your No.: RENTON HIGH SCHOOL RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 403 pE1/ELOPMENTPINN�NG 1220 NORTH 4TH STREET C�T(OF RENTON RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 AUG 2 0 1999 Attn: KATHY 1/1 RECEIVED Enclosed are your materials for the above transaction. If you have any questions regarding these materials, please contact us. Thank you for this opportunity to serve you. UNIT 10 - YOUR COMPLETE BUILDER/DEVELOPER SERVICE CENTER. WE HAVE EXPANDED TO SERVE ALL YOUR TITLE INSURANCE NEEDS RELATED TO LAND ACQUISITION, DEVELOPMENT FINANCING AND PROPERTY SUBDIVISION. MIKE HARRIS TITLE OFFICER (206) 628-5623 (E-MAIL: HARRISMI@CTT.COM) KEITH EISENBREY TITLE OFFICER (206) 628-8377 (E-MAIL: EISENBREYK@CTT.COM) STEVE KINSELLA CONDO COORDINATOR (206) 628-5614 (E-MAIL: KINSELLAS@CTT.COM) CHRIS JOHANSON SENIOR TITLE .EXAMINER BOB BLOEDEL SENIOR TITLE EXAMINER FAX NUMBER: (206) 628-9738 ** EXCISE TAX CHANGES ** ** EXCISE TAX CHANGES ** ** EXCISE TAX CHANGES ** City of Tukwila' s' excise tax rate is increasing to 1.78%- for documents dated December 1, 1998 or later. The old rate of 1.5396' will continue to apply to documents dated prior to December 1, 1998 . CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY nrLET/1O.17.91/SC CHICAGO iTI'LE INSURANCE COMP 1800 COLUIBIA CENTER, 701 5TH AVE SEATTLE, WA 98104 Order No.: 537484 SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE Certificate for Filing Proposed Short Plat In the matter of the short plat submitted for your approval,this Company has examined the records of the County Auditor and County Clerk of KING County,Washington,and the records of the Clerk of the United States Courts holding terms in said County,and from such examination hereby certifies that the title to the following described land situate in said KING County,to-wit: SEE SCHEDULE A(NEXT PAGE) VESTED IN: SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. SEVEN, AS TO PARCELS A AND B; AND RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 403, AS TO THE REMAINDER. EXCEPTIONS: SEE SCHEDULE B ATTACHED CHARGE: $500.00 TAX: $ 43 .00 Records examined to February 22, 1999 at 8:00 A.M. CHICAGO 111LE INSURANCE COMPANY By MIKE HARRIS/KEITH EISENBREY Title Officer (206) 628-5623 SHPLATA/12-51I0/EK .:HICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMP.,.. Order No.: 537484 SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE A (Continued) LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL A: THAT PORTION OF THE H. H. TOBIN DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 37 IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE STONE MONUMENT AT THE INTERSECTION OF SECOND AVE. AND BURNETT ST. IN THE TOWN OF RENTON; THENCE WEST IN EXTENSION OF SAID SECOND AVE. A DISTANCE OF 447.12 FEET; THENCE NORTH A DISTANCE OF 30.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH ALONG THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF MOTOR LINE ADDITION TO THE TOWN OF RENTON A DISTANCE OF 576.52 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTHERLY MARGIN OF THAT CERTAIN TRACT HERETOFORE DEEDED BY C. R. ADSIT; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHERLY MARGIN OF SAID TRACT A DISTANCE OF 375.3 FEET; THENCE SOUTH A DISTANCE OF 584.5 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE WESTERLY EXTENSION OF THE NORTHERLY MARGIN OF SECOND AVENUE; THENCE EAST A DISTANCE OF 375.3 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL B: THAT PORTION OF THE H. H. TOBIN DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 37 IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT WHICH IS 2165 FEET NORTH OF AND 645 FEET WEST OF THE CORNER COMMON TO SECTIONS 17, 18, 19, AND 20, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SAID POINT BEING 260.07 FEET EAST OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SMITHERS FOURTH ADDITION TO THE TOWN OF RENTON; THENCE NORTH 00°03'20" EAST A DISTANCE OF 567.68 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 89°56'20" WEST A DISTANCE OF 375.3 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°03'20" EAST A DISTANCE OF 583.97 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88°59'20" WEST A DISTANCE OF 366.0 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°03'20" WEST A DISTANCE OF 600.08 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°18' 13" EAST A DISTANCE OF 741.3 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL C: THAT PORTION OF THE H. H. TOBIN DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 37 IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF A 2 ACRE TRACT CONVEYED TO DAVID C. MITCHELL SEE NEXT PAGE CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPi-. I Policy No.: 537484 EXTENDED MORTGAGEE LEASEHOLD POLICY SCHEDULE A (Continued) LEGAL DESCRIPTION BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 189971, SAID POINT BEING 1077.12 FEET WEST AND 1136 .52 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BLOCK 25 OF THE TOWN OF RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 1 OF PLATS, PAGE 135, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID MITCHELL TRACT A DISTANCE OF 140.4 FEET TO THE PRODUCTION SOUTHERLY OF THE EAST LINE OF SHATTUCK STREET NORTH AS DEEDED TO THE CITY OF RENTON UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 941263, AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE WEST A DISTANCE OF 50 FEET; THENCE NORTH A DISTANCE OF 275 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF TOBIN AVENUE; THENCE EAST A DISTANCE OF 50 FEET TO SAID PRODUCED EAST LINE OF SHATTUCK STREET NORTH; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID PRODUCED LINE A DISTANCE OF 275 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL D: THAT PORTION OF THE H. H. TOBIN DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 37 IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A STONE MONUMENT ON THE SOUTHERLY MARGIN OF THE CITY OF SEATTLE PIPE LINE RIGHT OF WAY A DISTANCE OF 174.62 FEET EASTERLY FROM THE CITY OF RENTON CITY LIMITS, AS IT EXISTED ON JULY 28, 1943, ON THE BLACK RIVER; THENCE NORTHERLY AT A RIGHT ANGLE TO SAID SOUTHERLY MARGIN A DISTANCE OF 144 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY MARGIN OF SECOND AVENUE; THENCE SOUTH 89°04'45" EAST A DISTANCE OF 3.06 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 00°36' 00" EAST A DISTANCE OF 410.41 FEET; THENCE NORTH 17°54'48" EAST A DISTANCE OF 154.51 FEET TO A POINT SOUTH 88°13' 00" EAST A DISTANCE OF 23 .64 FEET FROM THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF VICTORIA KELLY ADDITION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 23 OF PLATS, PAGE 24, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE NORTH 88°13' 00" EAST ALONG THE PRODUCED SOUTHERLY MARGIN OF SAID ADDITION A DISTANCE OF 260.07 FEET TO A POINT ON THE CENTERLINE OF SHATTUCK STREET PRODUCED NORTHERLY A DISTANCE OF 637.60 FEET, MORE OR LESS, FROM ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE CENTERLINE OF SECOND AVENUE PRODUCED WESTERLY; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 88°13' 00" EAST A DISTANCE OF 154.57 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°46' 55" WEST A DISTANCE OF 602.98 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY MARGIN OF SECOND AVENUE; THENCE NORTH 89°56' 00" WEST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY MARGIN A DISTANCE OF 118.61 FEET TO- A POINT OF CURVE; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 416.06 FEET AN ARC DISTANCE OF 135.73 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVE; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 684.70 FEET AN ARC DISTANCE OF 210.10 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY CHICAGO I'I ILE INSURANCE COMP. Policy No.: 537484 EXTENDED MORTGAGEE LEASEHOLD POLICY SCHEDULE A (Continued) LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL E: THAT PORTION OF THE H. H. TOBIN DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 37 IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A STONE MONUMENT ON THE SOUTHERLY MARGIN OF THE CITY OF SEATTLE PIPE LINE RIGHT OF WAY A DISTANCE OF 174.62 FEET EASTERLY FROM THE CITY OF RENTON CITY LIMITS, AS IT EXISTED ON JULY 28, 1943, ON THE BLACK RIVER; THENCE NORTHERLY AT A RIGHT ANGLE TO SAID SOUTHERLY MARGIN A DISTANCE OF 144 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY MARGIN OF SECOND AVENUE AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 89°04'45" WEST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY MARGIN A DISTANCE OF 36.94 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°36' 00" EAST A DISTANCE OF 559.46 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY MARGIN OF VICTORIA AVENUE, 62.36 FEET WESTERLY FROM THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF VICTORIA A. KELLY ADDITION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 23 OF PLATS, PAGE 24, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE SOUTH 88°13' 00" WEST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY MARGIN AND SAID MARGIN PRODUCED A DISTANCE OF 86 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 17°54'48" WEST A DISTANCE OF 154.51 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°36' 00" WEST A DISTANCE OF 410.41 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY MARGIN OF SECOND AVENUE; THENCE NORTH 89°04'45" WEST A DISTANCE OF 3 .06 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL F: THAT PORTION OF THE H. H. TOBIN DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 37 IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF A 2 ACRE TRACT CONVEYED TO DAVID C. MITCHELL BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 189971, SAID POINT BEING 1077.12 FEET WEST AND 1136.52 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BLOCK 25 OF THE TOWN OF RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 1 OF PLATS, PAGE 135, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID MITCHELL TRACT A DISTANCE OF 144.4 FEET; THENCE NORTH A DISTANCE OF 275 FEET; THENCE EAST A DISTANCE OF 44 .4 FEET; THENCE SOUTH A DISTANCE OF 122 .5 FEET; THENCE EAST A DISTANCE OF 165.2 FEET; THENCE SOUTH A DISTANCE OF 152 .5 FEET; THENCE WEST A DISTANCE OF 65.2 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF THEREOF, IF ANY, LYING WITHIN THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMP. Y Policy No.: 537484 EXTENDED MORTGAGEE LEASEHOLD POLICY SCHEDULE A (Continued) LEGAL DESCRIPTION DEED FROM THE RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 403 TO GEORGE FABRE AND PAULINE FABRE, HUSBAND AND WIFE, UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 4596645, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THAT PORTION OF THE H. H. TOBIN DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 37 IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS : BEGINNING AT A MONUMENT AT THE INTERSECTION OF LOGAN STREET AND TOBIN AVENUE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, (SAID MONUMENT BEING ON THE CENTERLINE OF TOBIN AVENUE) ; THENCE WEST ON SAID CENTERLINE OF TOBIN AVENUE A DISTANCE OF 700 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 30 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF TOBIN AVENUE; THENCE WEST A DISTANCE OF 60 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 01°47' 00" WEST A DISTANCE OF 122 .5 FEET; THENCE WEST A DISTANCE OF 40 FEET; THENCE NORTH PARALLEL TO THE EAST LINE THEREOF A DISTANCE OF 122 .5 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF TOBIN AVENUE; THENCE EAST ON THE SOUTH LINE OF TOBIN AVENUE A DISTANCE OF 40 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL G: THAT PORTION OF THE H. H. TOBIN DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 37 IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS : BEGINNING AT A POINT 65.2 FEET EAST OF THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF A 2 ACRE TRACT CONVEYED TO DAVID C. MITCHELL BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 189971, SAID SOUTHEAST CORNER BEING 1077.12 FEET WEST AND 1136.52 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BLOCK 25 OF THE TOWN OF RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 1 OF PLATS, PAGE 135, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE NORTH A DISTANCE OF 155 FEET; THENCE EAST A DISTANCE OF 80 FEET; THENCE SOUTH A DISTANCE OF 155 FEET; THENCE WEST A DISTANCE OF 80 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL H: THAT PORTION OF THE H. H. TOBIN DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 37 IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT 414 .6 FEET EAST OF THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF A 2 ACRE TRACT CONVEYED TO DAVID C. MITCHELL BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 189971, SAID SOUTHEAST CORNER BEING 1077.12 FEET WEST AND 1136 .52 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BLOCK 25 OF THE TOWN OF RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMP I Policy No.: 537484 EXTENDED MORTGAGEE LEASEHOLD POLICY SCHEDULE A (Continued) LEGAL DESCRIPTION THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 1 OF PLATS, PAGE 135, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE NORTH 300 FEET; THENCE EAST A DISTANCE OF 145.20 FEET; THENCE SOUTH A DISTANCE OF 300 FEET AND PARALLEL TO THE FIRST LINE; THENCE WEST A DISTANCE OF 145.20 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THE EAST 60 FEET THEREOF; ALSO EXCEPT THE NORTH 25 FEET FOR STREET PURPOSES; ALSO EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF DESCRIBED IN DEED FROM THE RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 403 TO JOHN PLESE AND FRANCES PLESE, RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 4002996 AND RERECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 4006047, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THE WEST 4 FEET OF THE EAST 64 FEET OF A TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT 414.6 FEET EAST OF THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF A 2 ACRE TRACT CONVEYED TO DAVID C. MITCHELL BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 189971, SAID SOUTHEAST CORNER BEING 1077.12 FEET WEST AND 1136.52 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BLOCK 25 OF THE TOWN OF RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 1 OF PLATS, PAGE 135, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE NORTH 300 FEET; THENCE EAST A DISTANCE OF 145.20 FEET; THENCE SOUTH A DISTANCE OF 300 FEET AND PARALLEL TO THE FIRST LINE; THENCE WEST A DISTANCE OF 145.20 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL I: THAT PORTION OF THE H. H. TOBIN DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 37 IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THE SOUTH 155 FEET OF A TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT 280 FEET EAST OF THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF A 2 ACRE TRACT CONVEYED TO DAVID C. MITCHELL BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 189971, SAID SOUTHEAST CORNER BEING 1077.12 FEET WEST AND 1136.52 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BLOCK 25 OF THE TOWN OF RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 1 OF PLATS, PAGE 135, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE EAST A DISTANCE OF 134.6 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED TO RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 403 BY DEED RECORDED DECEMBER 23, 1949, UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 3970324; THENCE NORTH ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT A DISTANCE OF 300 FEET; THENCE WEST A DISTANCE OF 134.6 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO A POINT NORTH OF THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH A DISTANCE OF 300 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CHICAGO TIT LE INSURANCE COMPANY CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMP, Y Policy No.: 537484 EXTENDED MORTGAGEE LEASEHOLD POLICY SCHEDULE A (Continued) LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL J: THAT PORTION OF THE H. H. TOBIN DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 37 IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THE SOUTH 155 FEET OF THE EAST 60 FEET OF A TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT 414.6 FEET EAST OF THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF A 2 ACRE TRACT CONVEYED TO DAVID C. MITCHELL BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 189971, SAID SOUTHEAST CORNER BEING 1077.12 FEET WEST AND 1136.52 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BLOCK 25 OF THE TOWN OF RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 1 OF PLATS, PAGE 135, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE NORTH A DISTANCE OF 300 FEET; THENCE EAST A DISTANCE OF 145.20 FEET; THENCE SOUTH A DISTANCE OF 300 FEET; THENCE WEST A DISTANCE OF 145.20 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL K: THAT PORTION OF THE H. H. TOBIN DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 37 IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT 145.2 FEET EAST OF THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF A 2 ACRE TRACT CONVEYED TO DAVID C. MITCHELL BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 189971, SAID SOUTHEAST CORNER BEING 1077.12 FEET WEST AND 1136.52 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BLOCK 25 OF THE TOWN OF RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 1 OF PLATS, PAGE 135, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE NORTH A DISTANCE OF 155 FEET; THENCE EAST A DISTANCE OF 134.8 FEET; THENCE SOUTH A DISTANCE OF 155 FEET; THENCE WEST A DISTANCE OF 134.8 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; AND THAT PORTION OF THE H. H. TOBIN DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 37 IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT 145.2 FEET EAST OF THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF A 2 ACRE TRACT CONVEYED TO DAVID C. MITCHELL BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 189971, SAID SOUTHEAST CORNER BEING 1077.12 FEET WEST AND 1136.52 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BLOCK 25 OF THE TOWN OF RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 1 OF PLATS, PAGE 135, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE NORTH A DISTANCE OF 155 FEET; CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMP-.. . Policy/No.: 537484 EXTENDED MORTGAGEE LEASEHOLD POLICY SCHEDULE A (Continued) LEGAL DESCRIPTION THENCE EAST A DISTANCE OF 44 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH A DISTANCE OF 145 FEET; THENCE EAST A DISTANCE OF 90.8 FEET; THENCE SOUTH A DISTANCE OF 145 FEET; THENCE WEST A DISTANCE OF 90.8 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THE NORTH 25 FEET THENCE OF THE LAST DESCRIBED TRACT FOR STREET PURPOSES. PARCEL L: THAT PORTION OF THE H. H. TOBIN DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 37 IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT 145.2 FEET EAST OF THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF A 2 ACRE TRACT CONVEYED TO DAVID C. MITCHELL BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 189971, SAID SOUTHEAST CORNER BEING 1077.12 FEET WEST AND 1136.52 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BLOCK 25 OF THE TOWN OF RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 1 OF PLATS, PAGE 135, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE NORTH A DISTANCE OF 155 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING: THENCE EAST A DISTANCE OF 44 FEET; THENCE NORTH A DISTANCE OF 145 FEET; THENCE WEST A DISTANCE OF 44 FEET; THENCE SOUTH A DISTANCE OF 145 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THE NORTH 25 FEET THEREOF FOR STREET PURPOSES. PARCEL M: THAT PORTION OF THE H. H. TOBIN DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 37 IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT 1512.72 FEET WEST AND 1136.52 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BLOCK 25 OF THE TOWN OF RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 1 OF PLATS, PAGE 135, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE WEST A DISTANCE OF 72 .6 FEET; THENCE NORTH A DISTANCE OF 275 FEET; THENCE EAST A DISTANCE OF 72 .6 FEET; THENCE SOUTH A DISTANCE OF 275 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL N: THAT PORTION OF THE H. H. TOBIN DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 37 IN THE NORTHEAST CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPr_ �C Policy No.: 537484 EXTENDED MORTGAGEE LEASEHOLD POLICY SCHEDULE A (Continued) LEGAL DESCRIPTION QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT 670 FEET EAST OF THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF A 2 ACRE TRACT CONVEYED TO DAVID C. MITCHELL BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 189971, SAID SOUTHEAST CORNER BEING 1077.12 FEET WEST AND 1136.52 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BLOCK 25 OF THE TOWN OF RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 1 OF PLATS, PAGE 135, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE NORTH A DISTANCE OF 75 FEET; THENCE WEST A DISTANCE OF 110 FEET; THENCE SOUTH A DISTANCE OF 75 FEET; THENCE EAST A DISTANCE OF 110 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; PARCEL 0: THAT PORTION OF THE H. H. TOBIN DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 37 IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF VICTORIA A. KELLY ADDITION TO THE CITY OF RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 23 OF PLATS, PAGE 24, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE EAST A DISTANCE OF 290.4 FEET; THENCE SOUTH A DISTANCE OF 100 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH A DISTANCE OF 175 FEET; THENCE EAST A DISTANCE OF 96 FEET; THENCE NORTH A DISTANCE OF 275 FEET; THENCE WEST A DISTANCE OF 16 FEET; THENCE SOUTH A DISTANCE OF 100 FEET; THENCE WEST A DISTANCE OF 80 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL P: THAT PORTION OF THE H. H. TOBIN DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 37 IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT 217.80 FEET WEST OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF A 2 ACRE TRACT CONVEYED TO DAVID C. MITCHELL BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 189971; THENCE NORTH A DISTANCE OF 129.00 FEET; THENCE WEST A DISTANCE OF 72.60 FEET; THENCE SOUTH A DISTANCE OF 129.00 FEET; THENCE EAST A DISTANCE OF 72 .60 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING WEST OF A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND 5.00 FEET CHICAGO I I ILE INSURANCE COMPANY CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMP / Policy No.: 537484 EXTENDED MORTGAGEE LEASEHOLD POLICY SCHEDULE A (Continued) LEGAL DESCRIPTION EASTERLY OF, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF LOT 16, BLOCK 1, VICTORIA A. KELLY ADDITION TO THE CITY OF RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 23, OF PLATS, PAGE 24, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, AND NORTHERLY OF THE EASTERLY PRODUCTION OF THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 16. PARCEL Q: LOTS 13, 14, AND 15, BLOCK 1, VICTORIA A. KELLY ADDITION TO THE CITY OF RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 23 OF PLATS, PAGE 24, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. PARCEL R: THAT PORTION OF THE H. H. TOBIN DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 37 IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF A 2 ACRE TRACT CONVEYED TO DAVID C. MITCHELL BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 189971; THENCE WEST ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THE OLD FULLER PLACE A DISTANCE OF 72.60 FEET; THENCE NORTH A DISTANCE OF 129.00 FEET; THENCE EAST A DISTANCE OF 72.60 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID 2 ACRE TRACT; THENCE SOUTH A DISTANCE OF 129.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL S: LOT 16, BLOCK 1, VICTORIA A. KELLY ADDITION TO THE CITY OF RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 23 OF PLATS, PAGE 24, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; AND THE WESTERLY 5 FEET IN WIDTH OF THAT PORTION OF THE H. H. TOBIN DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 37 IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING EASTERLY OF SAID LOT 16, BLOCK 1, AND BETWEEN THE EASTERLY PRODUCTIONS OF THE NORTH AND SOUTH LINES OF SAID LOT. PARCEL T: THAT PORTION OF THE H. H. TOBIN DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 37 IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT 280 FEET EAST OF THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF A 2 ACRE TRACT CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPr_ Policy No.: 537484 EXTENDED MORTGAGEE LEASEHOLD POLICY SCHEDULE A (Continued) LEGAL DESCRIPTION CONVEYED TO DAVID C. MITCHELL BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 189971, SAID SOUTHEAST CORNER BEING 1077.12 FEET WEST AND 1136 .52 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BLOCK 25 OF THE TOWN OF RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 1 OF PLATS, PAGE 135, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE EAST A DISTANCE OF 134.5 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF A TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED TO RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 403 BY DEED RECORDED DECEMBER 23, 1949, UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 3970324; THENCE NORTH ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT A DISTANCE OF 300 FEET; THENCE WEST A DISTANCE OF 134.5 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO A POINT NORTH OF THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH A DISTANCE OF 300 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THE NORTH 25 FEET THEREOF FOR STREET PURPOSES BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 245468; ALSO EXCEPT THE SOUTH 155 FEET THEREOF. PARCEL U: THAT PORTION OF THE H. H. TOBIN DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 37 IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT WHICH IS THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTERLINE OF SECOND AVENUE AND SHATTUCK STREET IN THE CITY OF RENTON; THENCE NORTH 00°35' 00" EAST A DISTANCE OF 637.60 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88°13' 00" WEST A DISTANCE OF 346.07 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 88°13' 00" WEST A DISTANCE OF 314.43 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 29°35' 15" EAST A DISTANCE OF 188.65 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 07°50' 15" EAST A DISTANCE OF 164.31 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°24' 00" EAST A DISTANCE OF 195.49 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°36' 00" EAST A DISTANCE OF 318.96 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF, IF ANY, LYING WITHIN THE BED AND SHORES OF THE BLACK RIVER AS THEY WERE SITUATED WHEN SAID RIVER CEASED TO BE A NAVIGABLE STREAM. PARCEL V: THAT PORTION OF THE H. H. TOBIN DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 37 IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF A 2 ACRE TRACT CONVEYED TO DAVID C. MITCHELL CHICAGO 1I 1 LE INSURANCE COMPANY CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMP! f POIiCy No.: 537484 EXTENDED MORTGAGEE LEASEHOLD POLICY SCHEDULE A (Continued) LEGAL DESCRIPTION BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 189971, SAID SOUTHEAST CORNER BEING 1077.12 FEET WEST AND 1136 .52 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BLOCK 25 OF THE TOWN OF RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 1 OF PLATS, PAGE 135, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE EAST A DISTANCE OF 62.5 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH A DISTANCE OF 300 FEET; THENCE EAST A DISTANCE OF 80 FEET; THENCE SOUTH A DISTANCE OF 300 FEET; THENCE WEST A DISTANCE OF 80 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THE NORTH 25 FEET THEREOF FOR ROAD PURPOSES; ALSO EXCEPT THE SOUTH 155 FEET THEREOF. PARCEL W: THAT PORTION OF THE H. H. TOBIN DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 37 IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT 72.60 FEET WEST OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF A 2 ACRE TRACT CONVEYED TO DAVID C. MITCHELL BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 189971; THENCE WEST ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THE OLD FULLER PLACE A DISTANCE OF 72.60 FEET; THENCE NORTH A DISTANCE OF 129.00 FEET; THENCE EAST A DISTANCE OF 72.60 FEET; THENCE SOUTH A DISTANCE OF 129.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL X: THAT PORTION OF THE H. H. TOBIN DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 37 IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF A 2 ACRE TRACT CONVEYED TO DAVID C. MITCHELL BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 189971, SAID SOUTHEAST CORNER BEING 1077.12 FEET WEST AND 1136.52 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BLOCK 25 OF THE TOWN OF RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 1 OF PLATS, PAGE 135, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID MITCHELL TRACT A DISTANCE OF 194.40 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH A DISTANCE OF 275 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF TOBIN AVENUE; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE A DISTANCE OF 4 FEET; THENCE SOUTH A DISTANCE OF 275 FEET; WEST A DISTANCE OF 4 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. CHICAGO 1111E INSURANCE COMPANY CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMP:=.. ' Policy No.: 537484 EXTENDED MORTGAGEE LEASEHOLD POLICY SCHEDULE A (Continued) LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL Y: THAT PORTION OF THE H. H. TOBIN DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 37 IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF TOBIN AVENUE, 20 FEET WEST OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF A 2 ACRE TRACT CONVEYED TO DAVID C. MITCHELL BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 189971; THENCE SOUTH A DISTANCE OF 122.5 FEET; THENCE WEST PARALLEL WITH TH SOUTH LINE OF TOBIN AVENUE A DISTANCE OF 83 .81 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF A TRACT OF LAND DEEDED TO GEORGE FABRE AND PAULINE FABRE, HUSBAND AND WIFE, BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 2104714; THENCE NORTH 01°47' 00" EAST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID TRACT A DISTANCE OF 122.5 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF TOBIN AVENUE; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE A DISTANCE OF 80 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL Z: THAT PORTION OF THE H. H. TOBIN DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 37 IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF A 2 ACRE TRACT CONVEYED TO DAVID C. MITCHELL BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 189971; THENCE WEST ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THE OLD FULLER PLACE A DISTANCE OF 72.60 FEET; THENCE NORTH A DISTANCE OF 129 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH A DISTANCE OF 146 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF TOBIN STREET IN THE CITY OF RENTON; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE A DISTANCE OF 72 .60 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID 2 ACRE TRACT; THENCE SOUTH A DISTANCE OF 146 FEET; THENCE WEST A DISTANCE OF 72.60 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL AA: THAT PORTION OF THE H. H. TOBIN DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 37 IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF TOBIN STREET, 20 FEET WEST OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF A 2 ACRE TRACT CONVEYED TO DAVID C. MITCHELL BY DEED RECORDED CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMP I Policy No.: 537484 EXTENDED MORTGAGEE LEASEHOLD POLICY SCHEDULE A (Continued) LEGAL DESCRIPTION UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 189971, SAID NORTHEAST CORNER BEING 1077.12 FEET WEST AND 1411.52 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BLOCK 25 OF THE TOWN OF RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 1 OF PLATS, PAGE 135, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE SOUTH A DISTANCE OF 122.5 FEET; THENCE EAST A DISTANCE OF 85 FEET; THENCE NORTH A DISTANCE OF 122.5 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF TOBIN STREET; THENCE WEST, ALONG SAID STREET MARGIN, A DISTANCE OF 65 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL AB: THAT PORTION OF TRACT 7, SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL MAPS OF RENTON SHORE LANDS, AS SHOWN ON THE OFFICIAL MAPS THEREOF ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC LANDS AT OLYMPIA WASHINGTON, LYING NORTH OF THE WESTERLY PRODUCTION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF THAT PORTION OF THE H. H. TOBIN DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 37 IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTER LINES OF SECOND AVENUE AND SHATTUCK STREET IN THE CITY OF RENTON; THENCE NORTH 00°36' 00" EAST A DISTANCE OF 637.60 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88°13' 00" WEST A DISTANCE OF 346 . 07 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THIS DESCRIPTION; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 88°13' 00" WEST A DISTANCE OF 314 .43 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 29°35'15" EAST A DISTANCE OF 188 .65 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 07°50' 15" EAST A DISTANCE OF 164 .31 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°24' 00" EAST A DISTANCE OF 195.49 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°36' 00" EAST A DISTANCE OF 318.96 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL AC: THAT PORTION OF THE H. H. TOBIN DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 37 IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF A TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED TO LUCINDA AND JOHN WILLIAMS BY JOSIE JANOSKI BY DEED DATED JANUARY 22, 1909, AND RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 594247; THENCE EAST A DISTANCE OF 80 FEET; THENCE SOUTH A DISTANCE OF 100 FEET; THENCE WEST A DISTANCE OF 80 FEET; THENCE NORTH A DISTANCE OF 100 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Order No.: 537484 SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE.B This certificate does not insure against loss or damage by reason of the following exceptions: GENERAL EXCEPTIONS: A. Defects,liens,encumbrances,adverse claims or other matters,if any,created,first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires for value of record the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. B. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. C. Encroachments,overlaps,boundary line disputes,and any other matters which would be disclosed by an accurate survey and inspection of the premises. D. Easements or claims of easements not shown by the public records. E. Any lien,or right to lien,for contributions to employee benefit funds,or for state workers'compensation,or for services,labor,or material heretofore or hereafter furnished,all as imposed by law,and not shown by the public records. F. Liens under the Workmen's Compensation Act not shown by the public records. G. Any service,installation,connection,maintenance or construction charges for sewer,water,electricity or garbage removal. H. General taxes not now payable;matters relating to special assessments and special levies,if any,preceding or in the same becoming a lien. I. Reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; Indian tribal codes or regulations,Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, including easements or equitable servitudes. J. Water rights,claims,or title to water. K. THIS REPORT IS ISSUED AND ACCEPTED UPON THE UNDERSTANDING THAT THE LIABILITY OF THE COMPANY SHALL NOT EXCEED ONE THOUSAND DOLLARS($1000.00). SHPIATB/O318 4/soc CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY .:HICAGO I'U LE INSURANCE COMPS ! Order No.: 537484 SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B (Continued) EXCEPTIONS A 1. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: CITY OF RENTON PURPOSE: TRUNK SEWER AREA AFFECTED: A PORTION OF PARCELS R, W, AND Z, AS DESCRIBED IN SAID INSTRUMENT RECORDED: JUNE 22, 1922 RECORDING NUMBER: 1628000 s 2. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: CITY OF RENTON PURPOSE: PUBLIC UTILITIES (INCLUDING WATER AND SEWER) AREA AFFECTED: A PORTION OF PARCELS A, H, I, AND J, AS DESCRIBED IN SAID INSTRUMENT RECORDED: FEBRUARY 1, 1971 RECORDING NUMBER: 7102010228 c 3 . EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: CITY OF RENTON PURPOSE: PUBLIC UTILITIES (INCLUDING WATER AND SEWER) AREA AFFECTED: A PORTION OF PARCELS C AND D AS DESCRIBED IN SAID INSTRUMENT RECORDED: JUNE 27, 1985 RECORDING NUMBER: 8506270560 4. EXCEPTIONS AND RESERVATIONS CONTAINED IN DEED FROM THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, WHEREBY THE GRANTOR EXCEPTS AND RESERVES ALL OIL, GASES, COAL, ORES, MINERALS, FOSSILS, ETC. , AND THE RIGHT OF ENTRY FOR OPENING, DEVELOPING AND WORKING THE SAME AND PROVIDING THAT SUCH RIGHTS SHALL NOT BE EXERCISED UNTIL PROVISION HAS BEEN MADE FOR FULL PAYMENT OF ALL DAMAGES SUSTAINED BY REASON OF SUCH ENTRY; RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 5655162 . z RIGHT OF STATE OF WASHINGTON OR ITS SUCCESSORS, SUBJECT TO PAYMENT OF COMPENSATION THEREFORE, TO ACQUIRE RIGHTS OF WAY FOR PRIVATE RAILROADS, SKID ROADS, FLUMES, CANALS, WATER COURSES OR OTHER EASEMENTS FOR TRANSPORTING AND MOVING TIMBER, STONE, MINERALS AND OTHER PRODUCTS FROM CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMP, Y Order No.: 537484 SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B (Continued) EXCEPTIONS THIS AND OTHER PROPERTY, AS RESERVED IN DEED REFERRED TO ABOVE. ✓ AFFECTS: PARCEL AB. c 5. ANY PROHIBITION OR LIMITATION OF USE, OCCUPANCY OR IMPROVEMENT OF THE LAND RESULTING FROM THE RIGHTS OF THE PUBLIC OR RIPARIAN OWNERS TO USE ANY PORTION WHICH IS NOW OR HAS BEEN FORMERLY COVERED BY WATER. a AFFECTS : PARCEL AB. ✓ 6. PARAMOUNT RIGHTS AND EASEMENTS IN FAVOR OF THE UNITED STATES FOR COMMERCE, NAVIGATION, FISHERIES AND THE PRODUCTION OF POWER. J AFFECTS: PARCEL AB. • 7. THE PROPERTY HEREIN DESCRIBED IS CARRIED ON THE TAX ROLLS AS EXEMPT, HOWEVER IT WILL BECOME TAXABLE ON THE DATE OF THE EXECUTION OF A CONVEYANCE TO A TAXABLE ENTITY AND SUBJECT TO THE LIEN OF REAL PROPERTY TAXES FOR THE BALANCE OF THE YEAR FROM THAT DATE. TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 000720-0060-06 LEVY CODE: 2100 ASSESSED VALUE-LAND: $ NOT AVAILABLE ASSESSED VALUE-IMPROVEMENT: $ NOT AVAILABLE L AFFECTS: SAID PREMISES EXCEPT PARCELS Q AND S. M 8 . THE PROPERTY HEREIN DESCRIBED IS CARRIED ON THE TAX ROLLS AS EXEMPT, HOWEVER IT WILL BECOME TAXABLE ON THE DATE OF THE EXECUTION OF A CONVEYANCE TO A TAXABLE ENTITY AND SUBJECT TO THE LIEN OF REAL PROPERTY TAXES FOR THE BALANCE OF THE YEAR FROM THAT DATE. TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 380600-0065-02 LEVY CODE: 2100 ASSESSED VALUE-LAND: $ NOT AVAILABLE ASSESSED VALUE-IMPROVEMENT: $ NOT AVAILABLE x AFFECTS: PARCELS Q AND S. SHP[ATB3/12-12-90/EK CHICAGO 1111E INSURANCE COMPANY .:HICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPA. Order No.: 537484 SHORT PLAT CER HEICATE SCHEDULE B (Continued) EXCEPTIONS o 9. THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION IN THE DEEDS UNDER WHICH PARCEL U IS VESTED, RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBERS 4540447 AND 4540448, CONTAINS AN ERROR. THEY SHOW A CALL "THENCE NORTH 80°13'00" WEST A DISTANCE OF 346.07 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING". THIS CALL SHOULD READ "THENCE NORTH 88°13' 00" WEST A DISTANCE OF 346.07 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING" . P 10. THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION IN THE DEED UNDER WHICH PARCEL AA IS VESTED, RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 5095542, CONTAINS AN ERROR. THE CALL THEREIN WHICH READS "THENCE WEST ALONG SAID STREET MARGIN 20 FEET" IS UNNECESSARY AND GARBLES THE DESCRIPTION. O 11. THE FOLLOWING MATTERS DISCLOSED BY SURVEY RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8702039007: FENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF PARCEL A ENCROACHES WESTERLY OF SAID EAST LINE; AND GARAGE APPURTENANT TO PROPERTY EASTERLY OF PARCEL A ENCROACHES ONTO AN EASTERLY PORTION OF SAID PARCEL A. x 12. THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION IN THIS COMMITMENT IS BASED ON INFORMATION PROVIDED WITH THE APPLICATION AND THE PUBLIC RECORDS AS DEFINED IN THE POLICY TO ISSUE. THE PARTIES TO THE FORTHCOMING TRANSACTION MUST NOTIFY THE TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY PRIOR TO CLOSING IF THE DESCRIPTION DOES NOT CONFORM TO THEIR EXPECTATIONS. s NOTE 1: THE FOLLOWING MAY BE USED AS AN ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON THE DOCUMENTS TO BE RECORDED TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF R.C.W. 65.04. SAID ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS NOT A SUBSTITUTE FOR A COMPLETE LEGAL DESCRIPTION WHICH MUST ALSO APPEAR IN THE BODY OF THE DOCUMENT: LOTS 13-16, BLOCK 1, VOLUME 23 PLATS PG 24, AND A PORTION OF TRACT 7, 2ND SUPPLEMENTAL MAPS OF RENTON SHORE LANDS; AND THAT PORTION OF THE H. H. TOBIN DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 37 IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 18-23-5. AS OF FEBRUARY 22, 1999, THE TAX ACCOUNTS FOR SAID PREMISES ARE 000720-0060-06 AND 380600-0065-02. END OF SCHEDULE B SHPLATB3/12-12.90/EK CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 0 CHICAGO '1'1'1'LL INSURANCE COMPANY 1800 COLUMBIA CENTER, 701 5TH AVE, SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104 IMPORTANT: This is not a Survey. It is furnished as a convenience to locate the land indicated hereon with reference to streets and other land. No liability is assumed by reason of reliance hereon. H. H. Tobin Donation Land Claim No. 37 Victoria A. Kelley Addition to the City of Renton 23/24 Second Supplemental Maps of Renton Shore Lands Southerly portion of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 18-23-5 .... 'w J....t 1.:Y LM.._ l..a.l_. AY— . mo'. + . ^r;' 772930 If I�•I _ ' 630•.5,1 '1� i , I t I 1 -. x.; I I S fi!"fr rid a' •�`.�" S 4S TtLLICUN' ST. }e �- ��� on. - .i.J]-t Ir ,�1 Q3 I ... I fs✓.I.:Ai y ij .s'�eJ� S! s��l,w.o JiI i.� I 1 .Ai '° 'w»} ���.�3 < n.}l ll °�\i ,. ©tN , > s p ; D��37 00-' ST 3 _1 lir./it+.‘ r ...' N '11CTOA_• 4vE 'I ? P ir ' a. I — } -- ' ° �u_li.iy, I i/,raml• P y � r,lJ% t �fn�1 O �^ ' V. 4 ' •s a•,it • te,,F it I •• ';• C E .; Iy" • ••i- C •. f ,.. }I2 j ,, •',' I.20 ' " 4,, ' 2. t • 1 Ise.'; SECOND s V .. ' ` I . �•1-1. �.,;4 I S. sEcoNc sT I7C I LINE'O r� _ ...�. ._., .i "�� ICI C ...• >ati7 u • r ' , • ✓�'' `J u MAP • • 5 9 '4 th,i4ratili"tort ..,. 5_11-7. REN TON 1 TO THE TOI OF UhrT3:6 K/NG COUNTY 14 95H.. . J„ -- THIRD SFr c c •o e w+r. N ea•afc JO ♦O 04' .J r DESGRIPTiOM This p/al of,jM'Mera 4 d Ae.r 'me Te..^of r7•nron-.ee..P.ta a A.va-1 of/end Os tee/ N'irl et M.•e.rnern Joe- se I draeroeed ea fd/e..e' 1 P/63 INl A'or'T.of o^d!OS D .nI eN•Mr 4 .7 Beq.n.any a/a of NRJf.W Nmg Lew+n/rvmsw.•Ja.d goon, r,ona o m.'o onoa"p 2e of 7..a 2J d•d oa 5....Mera 2.11 Add. w/o Me T•+^ofP... ryoer J t• A•1•••• r.P. !Me R.owl of..sy of me G- N ir!comm.'e!a efJ Jrfi•r ro me nerin er/y More.^. dine^n N O'/J'K row; Csn M•^r•JO••J'C eJ•26'M'.eve.6J.!eel: Rw. M.we. S.6?•'6'N/Cl'l�•I.' Me^ee S :i L PJ. /6 tier NP/ete'•f e•g'nn:n7_71I.Acre�ie p Z /043 re feel. Mono• N.6f•4 re J awes,. wee ors mP.n M• /.r d..nenauw..aryeera '1 ..w ew.a 60 fie,So.,*.fend JO .r rh vn./ea. M,a Me NE rMn•r.f G/sea/ .4. rQME rl 7h.loMo•444m.P•••'•1./M./ ..y fee♦ N•esl of Je d pr.nl of Degrn'•"y In° Min , c. eaeDEDIGAT10Nn✓ e..nar Q a AlS.n.Mws. n lee J•M./. MIN n y Mot/froImhof", men 6 Meae Pr 4 M Add.w.n r.me To...•.f R...Mo.do'wd odI m n'ne..e// Y Mr-olreen. ® •!Me/end..nerve .n M.a 3M.'ea ra ae of M•Pue/.a f ✓ M.,,e r vwd eo hereby d.d.eml.w•M. .fe./•O ar l Ci Jw...n roof/Ae.. ro ••r n.y...MO!!am/Mra 24 day la rfOJ f-N.3.n'M..• to E. ✓.•v ee.,ar.n.w. INIII,, 7G I I O I ACKNOWLEDGMENT • Ma . I F _'� 0 Jro;of•✓eJAmghNr�S J d e dayeF Ocn b•r A V 12 Q - I D G my of Army fend Mel on rl.m 2 awm sew Q 3 a.'r'•'w•n• and re...Ma Jlore ofW 9 .fare',lc Me undira.oned a Nero y P..dhe.n nir.r•d.'e/ WOJAeed `O./!OJ D 3.....w•rJ.een••wne...ro ea.Na. J 1 ny.... edfr.ator•y my /.en of✓/or and ne 00000../edeed Mom end o e M• lor. eid•e ocl end deea fr lee use./W f' end..w• • .^• ma A.a!••end r•/ nrory • ar 1111111 QI I w•J.Vned end a.v/ed Me J j 1. 14 p✓rp 050$*Woo" m Poo/rond.lre.r/Jam/M•day end year in Mra e.rNlu/.dies,ee.re o My �.-- ..r'.•n IN M,•f...... N./ary P✓6Nc in a^d fie Me Srol.of Waihn:twofer., • Arc;Pled,A.i J.d day J /^per\`> [aa n•d and ovar.red Ner ear NQ.-trot C�.pr•�w• I'� /Asa Jr.deyo/.Nee.QQ./!OJ L/�let 301 o FOURTH �Z P.V E.O \- . Ca".ey J..r.•y.r CAa'. ' NA0•- ro— Q J C/erw df_f..F Fe•Oe/1 pa P.ny. \ "toorleot_0•,,,za-lt-1,•"iPfP9— 0 II `� 4 I y, 27B436r7te Ner.J'16J et'�ST:n.Po•rN / e/Rogue.,"of E Al S'..Jnera ..;n 4.5••oonly w..A. (t. and tor dP s n ✓•///ofP/ n Poq•/D- R.corda el g '... AM. end.....dR .gCo.¢.4Q=R'0a7. .,,7 caany.vrd.A. ---- IF 4 la it E.F. ay —— a,,e.y g 17 $• I 9 16 $ V 10 IS $ Jo v • II j4 If• f>J �• Y 3o' 10i e • Iz t , s ,.`, P•P . • IJ /y,5' Y. P' a 's �' ., r ;F`' 9te 59� _. VY' .,dn,•r«.,J.G ' 2 4 VIICOII A A KETITLU 0 • �• WO 'g`Hm CITY OF RENT ON • }.✓tout: 1"—100, lia,,sFcn,iZ .rl�cr dc.Gould. Civil EndinfoznAta.1*. g • ?iQ l . LT isi P L.A. . '�' w kt cs ii.l i..t.-LA!T a1J ao R;(.' 'J iC \ - e �+TOBIN --AV ENUE \ b •- 1 —'--4--srza _ -r— - zt \ O\ � ., sw J7 Jr �l rr Js Js ..,7 .M/ �rw� tz,,,,,,,,,,,,a,.,,,,,„.,,,„„,„ � 6( \.9ja W ,ti6 7 6 J s J 2 /18 v k to and for the totr of troXington, �`. t 1 r duty F mt7JMnea on J a'n, a nett .fee"- Ie •� ceth /hat on the/9 ida e/Sedl e r \\a \ w " /9/7, 6t sane//q,!enp�oral defcrr,ro ee \\y\-67 8 9 ti Y �9 A� // /2 O !l hi. /6 h totn ktw„7'/p de ff�e,a e aup/w.SoJ 9 e# a,. p/atandoeacahon td,M,en/hLroQfrrx../ty \�\\\\\ Q • `%a r 7ent J attached ond,vno,ochr,pw/eO dtb iro teat he,raj artornew,n tact fer!Jn e1/yand +�\\ - .•1 Jr �r Jr Jr ,7r y J7 Z - "'cry A.,e /,ha,Wf andtha/ nerto7 it„,,�W eo /na e'ert on fho oav rled,v,th h4�o/tor ar NmeG�rm- \ �� rv,tfar7.7:l ,an6ttvrtheJam1//Yy"6.//e1/yi7444m/eortd N,\L\:�% VICTORIA AVENUE A to me rh ne/rcc curt ry and ot• nett infret h()e elt otr- e`•"n�\\ --- J ee',cf C ✓�1 cy m fact to the ao.d bier anaoedii.olron m tento oft- \' \ , • prnado/J and the adlo al me tree end rp/untan/aeo? deed'of Jaid Lt.ffe//y andY,cto-,a et HJe//u for the sect and \�� •�\\ �11T p 1 • ,.�5.! 5�17 p rpeiv mennonea, Jo,D ohrhothemor/e.,,,CDaµgo.v/ed - \ J:?o;gc men,a,attdrx tear Juo lento/to/tie acme koynvnt cp- \\\\\\ 1 o r es pear ng en Jo,o�of o/teemed bertha �woi"er' 6rrna,dermyhcndondtcio/Jeat/hu/9!'dayafJep/erbv./9/7• ,,. "ueLw i ,bon A/Yrighl�� ...0 * f XjM n..e'.iJetihtt7.A.'i d f ESCRIPTION DEDICATION ICl TION ACKNOWLEDGMENT The initio/point of this plat is/Yorth/4/152, Know all men by these ores4n/s/ho//the c5tote of ash 11 J s�/ to certify that• on anal crest/6fZ 92 Jr from o sandstone mon- under,7tgne ,,attorney/ act for D.f.Ke//ono' DauntyotKiq J ument 60kt.crest of the Sirccyner of Block f ctorio/1./Ie/tu(his Nile) who are theory er,�.t ore la of Renton Town /te,from rr n Jtaa5 follows:- f.cto,o to e/n Add to h G ty at Re oo n t under ion d of Public m a be heK3tote land embraced in f ia/cr //fJ f fhtsp/atotaddee- ottrash trash; commissioned and J�w-agor,.ar b e. to the e 5/ ator c.wu h rit hence or.,o4tash,do�yjera ,dec ace Q Kelly,to me known to bete/nd, bin Ave.to ono bank a took h i} a k h u-- or/lotion lie f and her tl dedicate/e the caeca the a/y came ! n but caster/y o on the east bola'�tocti/t%�' pith fie forerer p/�sI tads andot/eus p/btfedthere- rr ua whole namce�cr J�ubscr/ cwal//eo t edger? tyotr�, her 42S t to a point 273'south t E 63r thence ail c a%o hand m ne a produ i to the s b ne ea herd hat on a'an t sea/ea'thesame ar his tree ow tau addition thence / s d ced !u h fr parallel mmvenu49apo torpbe- the right to mine, uo hereby p ocure'thehsame ses herein meact ntionhand ed ed for thep uses and Pvrpn- i ginning.south from o q q /9!"day of under rmy ha/a d f. gtnnin .A////n To /n's Donation Claim s37i7 �C. at on t me hetr6fter. 4//distances orrcvshcwn Given underm ordond ffi'eia/lea this /6-Z -S. on plat A /n ty//noes this whereof hereuntoLem set mu ,r Sias A./rri tit Approved , the Attorney of the Gi'ty of8en/an hand aridseo/4is/9'--"dayat'Jeptembrt9/72.0 ; R" ,yddry P�6%o for/he S/dfe of this 202 day of jeptemam e t9/7A."D. D f./rel/ ,,TiA,. ild ar m,day in ee//k. Dave/6pby iiCtorian..Ket/y C/y A/fwrney by ir.D fret/y /3274/6 ittorney to/ac/fd o..rifet/y.,,,./ 1,6,+a,tde,5, Filed for record t the reques of P Finiyonl/�.v this by the Engineer n, the Cifyafllenton i/mess 2 pod u / din D.t ot 21nin/Jesp e 24 this ZO!"ddy of c5cpteI!6 it rnick 9/7 / 1.G.Porker p W. G.lrg/hear t1��rored b /he Counci/oft Git of&n/oft Accords of/ling County,/rash. y City Engineer this ZO?_ria ofiept,/9/7 Nauman/3f./tamale// of RFy irm. Tonkime by G Go n,/y At ida.- A.6cFmmer, V�� o Afoy>a//heCi&of/,ea/o+ Depvfy SEAL i' 9bN - :# .: :,, '7'Z.....k',..1;}.r..SS tri!.... i.,•..:-, -.. ,,,..•:, ,,....i.:. ;.1% g.•,,' . - .7..,,_ -_-. _.;,-,.•.:- '' - a . • -.....„„ -. nil. i cr,,,---.-n:• ;•-•: 7 -'' - rri• 7 1.911 62 740368 " :;ar ij 1911 ',,3 ?rico , ,- :3e-t• q, Xdwin ';', 2mithers 7-'re4 1 5mithors rind Ada Thorna all cr 76ntQn 7 t o tioitool Distriot No• Soven 't) 7„,:-.*: - • f p o ani w to w p the fol tioo 1:24 in zcw be at the e.tene IzeA ot t2so into? of fleeoa4 Av . 024 Burnett .. .._ St. in the Taw,rJ of Tiooton run tb west in entonsion of 64 ;. eacnd ih ,:.-:;,.,•,,i..:, -..., Ives 447•1R ft.• th nrorth_30.11.. to the iarno pt of bog run tli tite 'moot Niri;2 01 9410t4',*,-lino sad to tho 11Nroa of RtrIt '--: -,'::i.,--.-7;, 'I.--2-: • 576,3k .ti *Twit .. 1 to. the Oti f oorl : ftit - - -:------CtatV 4 • , ;ItorotOfties:. '.; _.:•-,-,4:.,,,,,,,,.•.-:-.--. ._„ ,.. , .4-, , • at by t IL',. - i.iran 144:•41r45, 4,- •,::-. ..-"... .,,, i4,-'.;::.ai:j1.•,.....-,-= th sonth.-:-1 - : 'CS,* 11.1*-'741et-Z,:- ‘ .-...:..., 111011t, - - • -' - '. -::---::11.410.,P$41Pill . ., ---.•.',.: of-.tit livo •-:-'_:th'-'. •ftt-e7. iftsaa, ft. .tir: , _s... -- : . - Os g cry i : . - - --r-t-.;YF-...'--;, -,.. - •-- - -:, ,-,- ,,f-,.;-_-:,..-.: -•, .• - ,;.i_ -.---F0-..:•.-- • 7.' . ' '.; •k* 1 NI Midi, -X alialMATS -- : 5`riiii: ft,Switheri - .:- A4o Titr0 .• 1911 by 'PZ8 7143 -441: AT bf "ova if Renege •rlp filr w At Penton A 1 (4% 1 al ri 1913 Iff fi.ti by 7 T Talbott Renton V TeDP iiik r.. - ''7 ''''-' 7. _ .. .— 1T.e.r- .e �rf•'. .^."! -a ��7. ��r • --T^• ..t •r+JY `�I• .. ._. ... ...•"..M1 ..-2•• -. . .... ...— ..:�.::• "..::t.1 thsrd ,• _"1i.: D.L:5:.:m.r.c , : a :L:.- r.��1 _.:_.,.:•.:V. _ 5.. ..o*.. ,:c. �:;itt;ci L:IaL1Io«..{: 4. ..try( . -., 1'3I and .%r: to tp r.ha fdxQ j, 041'1 Tht ptn of the To'cir: ton CL. mr.ire pe.rt.t c f; k` oes;: rt:zh Se 21.1S ft r4 off` ar_4 G4:5 ft 17 of :c.o ror ucezzta to :=r3la .i 17-A3-19 end-20 Tp 2 nr- .'r"e�ti rows, ,d pt -?.4e3n", -26G.09 ft o of •i the rs oor of.. mt tl±.t2s t h... 9d to the town. of nent:n, ran th F J"J:t"2tr^ 2'5Vt. ft to they trrar Poi), ' ti N 89° 56'20" ti 3755.3 ft a `` th 7! 04*C392�" 3 Z,S3.97 MI th II' ;3`G5, i4t)" w ix66.O :t, t 0`03* i rs^ 7 500. 5f:a thk39-9wiv1741..3fttoDobaant5co ;::i an Inkat rmbj to 4.1. esm`t to the Uhi sen.1'.i1 on et. roe !1y` u . for *hi..gh tub ton pomp :ales. • Th:ia eQntoysaee Imo it fulasl cr.! tht oertaiA colt 4to may 1:-•29 4tsrtr®tf13g th a abidvio dad 22v and :13 antsj to erg and all txx ant tteax to tht Leaoms it iiiu1 thriti rt:t:say�enl to sd date. SL'ei!: P. itaters =+ ?Liu 1 ..&ai Lhe.•a I . Ada Thorne 1:oR '..:ay I.3-a by t::iwin :.s:riltt tu, Pala 13bera sw sit d3 'fiorne, bet' :'!saes l'.Wt3.kinG rp for trig rea et s•tnntcn rs tt.? -33 .. T1 tip VI*. C t pbe ll. Minton l • z 4-4. ,7 � . :`T: .1 '43 ,1%1t. 051 tzar. •jY si'+ It' ' �'aI it Mit00.111I U.anti .e tZailt ..•0 ty f,'is i;:t ;. r.: Tht :;tg at trio ffiv.ry Tobin L;03. Cislit d f; ‘-3-1s,i at :il.§ so nor of A 2 nc tt Glad to un1.0 oltit4lsol1 kS bead roc 3s rol 254 of de eds ;(1 140 r.,as of aid car iki, pg hey :C ..e,2 tt i* affi 11)6,32 rt t of tot ore 4i2. oz Bit 23 T or &oit gat aQ3 to p1 s* tact rya $,n vol I Jt ar.. plats Pi 1l rso of :sd Co, t W aig tto S IA a sa Uito,holl 'ft .b0 ft is +tko yrolootiats et y of tile 7: la et 5►b ttc+tic d't !t as deeded to • the � r# Fist ou, h f dsad ro: is TIts1 eV of dsodos pg 1:6 =der a cd filo 0 No 942.26) rag ccr $4 Co, and ate Oa* pods th, h 501 ft. tit I 271, ft to t toa a is of :Cobii Lrd, tt/ 11 R ft to ad prom . l t':a sk % M, takaolgs1 mstto Z75 rt tt taus p1of bag geb,j to olsob ttssr3 .liA *sat groat ad Ia Gai/Aso. m1 & Qt. two. &3.y •. i'de did Atii 20...111 zoo itti 3 i-14 ta cal 1tt4 ate taatti , 74 rider end -:} ilia Nrst 12329524 Igis AntQ is su43 to Use fa zoliscp as revs sat $t tm-wit; • v ....•Y41�lr• - J v v I / 1iz k it t 4* r t, o S IA:4,,;'t943 k.al nrilaa :iTt r a rsi ages ysi pia b..x1 •h t i• ;. rartoo r rt to olzas i.rtio L Aal, 3zca14 ssvz: w alaz mad wa..*. :.zx i.ae tarti ytt prem. Zari4 g.iteratil 3rnts far 21.4,3 tir Da.Tiii Vidake11 azA 3;111a 1.4it 11. *et �•..'�rai 12n D? fox !'w Z02 sti 441IIti,12 liar 6•r la CA =%61:1#08 a `on 04A o11) C. gi.�v-i._ 7hz..•1^.. .�A�. „y.�h t;•�i.Tv T+ti` 1t 4+;. •!:i':;�.;, 12aai� H r k`i r�-�.��:t -�v1Vei d .+ ga br u • y ..G ` r L 23 i r - i kd a co .;4ci ..;,G :al.i. *1 DiotrI Z a w.J3 a f,:.:.a!2:a Jr ' ,:! s:“2,Ittli,S J$' 1.14 llat ti':+ "'hi1K`.J'.Lw+I4431 yJiaLr1C'a ..:. 7. -ulla of ,:a4 t Df rr. e) fip 4 ta421Z resit ilAnim F'Ornuf iisazy li 8aii ,ia tlaaa�1&i A )7, 4�:2zn><2.:irat&zu ata. i?Assicgtztimeaof sor s pl.;w lip :rt. 2Vricy 174.611ft ti: fra, ci Lydf 4 en:r,.. ;Ai%iiits oelAoc liiver; tei iithlyajt a xtg::L a:- ,CLa ivad .. rsg.:► 1.4 4't 401.n4 N "0:f siottp g Ave; Ilia 89.44'4Y' t: 3.06 ft totustz'ttai t a;'beg; tto C.36' g 410.4L ft; tk V L7'54'48' i54.31:i So 3 ply south 444,1,s OD 3 2$.64 tt fr'ss.thass a a2 of r iatl zt&.• 4.til'i lam a:11 23 kat4 14 pg 14 sa.ts ; th ; 46101.3'0J¢ E cs.R ;:r og o,e4 ';oath (i misoia4 a da aaAn 't to apt aaxstoosat i.11m" oraaatta sg at rra.tmoc.t nihl,j 647,40fX liaS1 fromita iata►asiitht►heost/9t arttlimaof syoonadvrc imadssod %ly tMos% 4 selp , I► 15 .57f;;Cta., 3444155" T 6D2.9+llfa tstaaa s naf aaaardaVt)th ‘49(-448CIPO W a3.ed ti atol /.411.ft to pt '; f ovrva tbaaa earn, totAtrigltaitiba sad st 4160$ tt,135.7;ft taw pl otri at ee auc fe1 tham+a •rive tathalsft vita as radius az t34.74 ft 213..U3 ft tea apt snag; Itaati 6.12 sor*a` al Alla D utter% Saia►taof Ada j+.:Di'ns t.402,14 D bh slim 1.zoautaw ksa hi]. 21 3 !'y ].La a 8retiithara tf thitth aaip i.au n +4nu'og:ta(N ; 341. 15 bo`a kg JL1 22 43 "y 047)r0 itk+3c.Lar 4= bt t:eavatof'da hors* Itt Lit �' 3aa6az* mp areset a(Dt fs'a 7 44►laiis;rmaten , , 17- D Jul 2S 4, Tu.'. 21 43 0l. al..t D Siali4Isrs a ,i ctou ar a mad Gsarc.a C 'xtonl.sr =For t:�cat OfAdt Y1132 to ROAL2DatX0131 Dist zio t etc 403 a iaaL arp /.f thsat ofin re suissa$rxr Wail :otha Aant:a424!sauI. Diattiat ==4 7 * sxsns.rp0f In Pram uasry g'eoe is joutiAlioGialm No 37 c d f i Boa a t aye soa. et tho south zgameolt7ufasoltlelipa Liao r.lght arum/ 174.62 ft sly traml►noei4ofamtau sit,; L1ai:to tiaolax laver; tb !:al., at a 214At a 4,10 is ash saws 11,4 ft astka sr. .ar .bat.4 hso,at 4,/ t.a trn.o p t atn*as i ta at 390,10 W a1 at k 24111 36.% ft.; tha 4 3. a a 579 4 ft to a pi sattsa aut:uetaf Tiataria A7s;41206 fl alf frua6 tits zo 4ar or nets:La i; 14117 cdd as r+oadl 2) ;flats 24 p rasa r [V4 tb e615413'00' i slay : tt-:04^w Lr.e:rttsit.t:ase.mt g2sr{earad 8e Zb to . 17•54'46" 'V 1. s5.11:;tAL 043 i0Je 4 410. 1_ft totilim N mgn of a. 11111 ..414=41 s?c i.:1 49°04.45" 5 71< :1 ft tatnvtaa':s 540 j.iu '� Z� a) i �`� r fl f1( i lb .._.. L Lac r-44 54 74E15 . . 4,:4Q 5-4..i i10. 4.1,:5 i_3f. ;e1 .(:k) 3-t " - --- ' %avid Mitchell and ;Tulle 1,:tcb&;1, .At 4. �a naantot3 Sohool Disl:riat No 403 King County., va Liiat•.on it- 3Jp ay end wrr to up the hire in kov Tht certain pta o:f the Verify !.Tobia Don -%Iaixe d 1'1 i---, Bag at the se aor of a 2 as tt axed to DsT1d 0 .E/tonsil '0y clued ?-eQ to vcl 254 of deeds. pg 1110 r*o of lead Cos ad 344, ueia6 1077.12 Dt 1 and `.. 11,6.52 ft N of the arcs oar of B1k 25 Town of Le.a.ton, ace to pletatkot ::.% . rea is prat 1 otvRtets p; 135 rso 4f 3d 0o, th b el.g toe S In of ads Mt7.ahell tt 3.44.4 ft, WI N 275 Tt, th h 4. .4 ft, th 3 122.5 ft, th 3 ' 165,2 ft, ski 152.5 ft, th W 65.2 ft to pob ` David 1ltohsll Tali* 1Utoha;.l kale Dee 22.1.4 i ► I:Avid &iteb.i1 �pd d11ia 1:1toholl, b t.Z.Conklia nip for es ran et fientan is less 6'-4F, ( Tore Dobson :.Son, Renton) L Deo 29. �' 3b? 9� - faro i 5.4�ti 1D. l.l0 i:ex 1. c••C - o r V 9. '- i `V s - L10 Ot0V i 1 J / /^ D Apr 293397269 , , 99 War X8 0.00 $1.10 Srt $1.00 at Fred Tomer and WITurser, hoe tp moo School Pizt1Ct ' O3 Ling Ccy, 3ta1:a It ashington fp eye aid wawa to ap the Zi re sit kor ?ht prt of the Bears D. Tobin Donation Claim No. 37 dat Haw 65.2 'ft Y of the W; aorot a 2 sore tr fi ed to D. C. Mitchell *f Charles Dry Apr 26 00 ad or being 1077.12 ft R and 1136.52 ft Wtad the SW oar of k 2S of the Tina of Rid, scedg to prat thraf roodd in iol 1 of plate pd 135 revs of ad co th 1155 ft th 1 80 ft th S 155 ft th W 80 ft to tob Prod Qnsa r 0 nary ruiner ksw Lir 18 49 IV h� ?!> ear aWi3 Mary Turns? b! ?s 3foisoasJs'. up for sa rs filtomicse Os Pb* 37 500. up 911 3rd Al'o Banton, ern fid _._.. " (-`-1 • —4? 3 9-4 j ,`,10.00 }' `r b11 S2.CJ:J 5z. ... . Auguaton, is ri lC s l s *Ti carp ;,'r Renton .�4�'2rJZ`rXa�a"� � $ ta i4e and bars to 3p * 4it is c. , m Qaf C oaeor�c ing at ,; ?; 4i4 .6 ft _ : Pt:f of H Et Tobin D� . 3fl ccrn of ,2-acres O" la eyed tO bavid C Mitchell by 6r thn an Apr 2,e--19 0; th IN 300 ft; th E 145.20 ft; th ; 300 ft .nd parallel to 1st line; ' i` 145.20 ft to pbb, EEC E ':O ft thereof; EEC therefrom & 25 ft itOr.,0 6 purple. -► :� .: . �..:�, a widow, be S ( Schau ie$ np for wn . key Asa It.-49 �� to � t an 3!3 $base t. reps at Renton (nit 4-�'12' r h f1 • o Q~ ASoo#atea, 'tc . !id s':ao ,t-; Y • 7. Apr 10 50 41103192 •: • Apr 6 50 $1o,00 t2, + 't *2.50 3t • . 'Ivor Wiliam and Liza Culp a s, Serf r.Vm and :r.� A:; 10 "44 end repA ?4 It dates of rsacng title .. .. to Renton School D'act 003co rp eas and raro to sp the fd s+e sit ken ...: ?tat of notry Fable motion Claim eat' .r : S 155 ft of a tr of land dcf Dap 2l30 ft E of the3X esor of & two as tr of land eyed to Dav:d C. •'; %. Kitchell shell by Charite Sri en Apr 26 00 by dd r+edd under and filo No. I8997 .. r of ad ao; th R 1314.6 ft to the 3i *ore the t.: of lai eyed to inton Mina Distrtek No. 403 by dd reddd Dee 23 49 snider and file U. 39 0324; th ,J sing the Yly In e3' sd tr 300 ft th V 134.6 'y ft more or lass to a pent X of to pob th S 300 ft to the rw Vilitmno Zits& Williams .. Lisa Willy tw Ayr b 50 by Ivor Williama and Liza Williams bf Thomas S. Dobson np form roe Renton (ns Vwb 15*) L Tax Dobson a Son Pontoon, wn fId sr D Apr 10 �, �*0031 3 =, - Mar 11 50 410.G0 $1.65 t rt $1.50 st `\, - art Piss and Fitness Ply, h�xf to Pnntsvn Scheel Dist?iOt #03 haw s school dlatiot of the lot ate tea and wars to ep the Ure sit long `7; r.: i , Tht prt of Busy R.Iobtn plats Clair def The 3155ftofthat 60 ftoftt? Landdef 754aj 4111.6 ft g o the 133 esroft two zero tr of land eyed to Darid C Kltrhell by aarlim1..pr 26 00 sd nor being 10;.12 ft -' and 1116.52 ft N of the SW ear of blk 25 of the Town of Renton aedg to J 812�3$�r�®d in vol IL 3 �0 ft 16e Y ley#20 ft to tl�a��ob pc 135 roes of sd op; th ]a 300 ft t - John ?1st* Frances Plea* Vow Mar 11 50 by bf ThomaP 3. Dobson np 1'Urwn ante Renton (no Fob 1 54) Ton tie+ iTh ton, era fld Moo \)t J tit J Jul 15 50 4 03 5841 Jun 20 50 $10.00 $3.85 "irt *3.50 at A thux* Sdt trds, -Ne11i.e Edwards and Arthur Edwards, Jr. to Renton School District No. 403 , Xing County, Washington fp cys and tars to sp the fd re sit key: An undiv ed 1/6th int each in ana to: j Tr As daf: Tht prt of the Henry Tobin Do iti+�a Clain No. 37, daf Baap 145.2 ft E of the SE eor of a VON core tract eyed "to D. Mitchell by Charles Bruhn Apr 26-00 ad cer"being 1077.f2 ft W and 1136.52 ft if of the -SW aorof-blk 25 of the Town if Rsntdn, acodg to plat throfreodd in 'col 1 of plats pg135 roes -of sd "os; th 1155 ft th E 134 .8 ft th 3 155 ft th W 134 .8 to thepob Tr 3: daf: Tht prt of the Henn H. Tobin Donation Claim Ic. 37, daf " Baap 145.2 ft E of the SE oor of a MK do "acre tr eyed to D. C. itohell by Cbsrles -?ruhnt Apr-26 00 ad nor being 1077 ;12 ft W and 1136.52 ft I of the SW oorof tills 25 of the Town of-Renton - aecdg to plat throf r.cdd in vol 1 of plats pg 135 rocs of ad co; thNl55ftthE44ftto the true pobthIll ftth290.8ft - th S 145 ft th W $90.8 ft to the true pob Except tbeJ 25 ft thief • rserved for street purposes. Arthur Edwia rd s Nellie Edwards _ Acommati_ tb) Arthur Edwards, Jr. coo 40358 41--2 kow Jun 20 5 ) by Arthur E. Edwards, Xellie Edwards and Arthur 3dwadis, Jr. -bt Thoocar S. Do son np for wn ro8 Renton (no Feb 1 54) 141 Toe Dobson & Son 911 3rd bye Renton, wn td STao fb • a D Jul 15 50 2C35 3142 May 27 50 412211 .83 $1.65 in -$1.50 at Arthur E. tEdwaa!s, Guardian of the Estate of lipry A. Priebe, ,e Incompetent, purstant to thtsertain order of Court dtd gay 27 50. to Renton 3chOol Distiot No. 1103, kcw fp oya and wars to ap the fd re sit kale An undivided 1/6th int in and to: Tr A: dal*: — Tht prt--ant dee as in 8 l--(both pareels) Arthur E. ands, Gnairdian of the Estate of Xary A.Priobt, ittaoapticent kow ray 27 50 by Arthur E. Edwads, Guardian of the Zatate of Mary A. Priebe, 2ticaipetent bf Agnes N. Riotiadnd np Sutra res F. (na NW 1 54)fl1 TcsCobson & Son 911 3rd Ave Renton, m fld 3Tco fb 1 fT JJ/ D Jul 15 50 40358 3 May 27 50 1124219.66 $2.2:2175 in $2.50 at - Arthur E. Mardis, -Guardian of the Estate of Henry Prisbs and Alfred Priebe, incompetents:, pent to :ht certain order of C curt •d t d May 27 50 to Renton School Distrtct Ho. 403, key fp Sys and wars to sp the fd re sit kcur. An andivied-2/6ths int in and-tot Tr A; daft --sm des as in 841--(both parcels) Arthur E'. Zdsrards. Mardian of the EstatS - of Henry :°rillsbe araa Alfred Priebe, ineoap- etents.km( May May 27 50 by Arthur E.-Edwao ls, Guardian of the Estate of - Henry Priebe and Alfred Priebe, incodpetents bt Agnes L. Richmond np form res S (na May 1 5111)Mi Tom Dobson 8c Son 911 3rd Ave S'wu fld &To o fb I ` J E11zabetn L . ����un.- 51 by Fy.ea _ �lr a1: Lt.,i ac.. Acapulco Co Guerrero Mexico Feb 1. cl= ,es ;� hwf, ces %%pj,ulig2=41: 1t-i, and Elizao th :� S'�'Co (rytL a t Acapulco' c apulc O na n 3e*b r L ?1 4112649 .. Feb o 51 $7 5 . t1 .10 IRX Stx R� thel Ratkcwski, furnrly Rachel ?r{'=re Renton 'i {..'i f o r �i mo t. ��cc S yy, t.. c �L .E� ! � .i7 t. •, 1�J . �ii3, r'_'.rysv� a:� '!eY' sole iw ►�jNr (7; 'F' fp cg4w to ►i f fire .r h,4 f, porn: i<<.i y��nr r , _� ;? ' D;•n_'i ' on t• •t'r" l ' -e? tF1 •1 'I..L i � � r a� �.. at pt 145. 2 _ o.: toe l s:•. c urnr' of ? two i.c 'e t a eyd to ID c Mitchell ''l r t-, Apr 2' .,; - - � ��} _ ..:: ..az _ �, I i, _'��l.c ..a 'v _ w.J G!i 7 .3�?I'' •'.?;i.2`i� �L'_! i' � f't 1 and }..' _':�.:. :;,,. t r, cP the 3W uoi iix iI' .Bi of:ft J'{ the, TCiw Rentcn %:i;r?.g to plat thrf re i . :1 1 i .^ts r 135 r c of J i. ; t S true tit F 4.tj. tr.' 14 4;2, i-{. th W X44 ft th S 145 ft tu true pot ; L'+xce pt be `!_'? 25 ft the ref reserve for street pur 'oae2); S -.Y. ,��'.:�.,- .. .._ F',�i i���l i•�".:i t�. a «,1i 4"'r•!J.'.. t• 1'li?che.:- i`e . ;. Santa 1i '.' t V 'r . :i,].jf Feb 5 by ;::`l.rlel .'Rutkow:i `i Y''•�tis..u'iy cii."', Priebe, `!e f P . r" Ott"!a .:ji fur tJhilr .r-y. ' J commsn eg_pi rc,. F' ' . :' (M T kill% - 4112620 5� 4'.4.i)G 4 tx c guardian FPS 0' G. $` . a�ia].fd Feb 3 51375,,.�r. . as duly appo�rted ,ant to that Certn i__....F ro7�fiOT: pur .. �_„" gi'1�1 --- mwalmimmu.- D Feb :);.: 51 4112650 Feb 3 51 .r-_,'75 liao . 0 .4G 4.)4.(1C, otl Arthu-.4 siz. FAwf.tnis, as duly appot.rted valfd and acts clarlt9n of M :ry A . Priebe, an incompetent person pureunt to that r;ertn rr ,:cf cou-t 51, C!..4use No. 4.:-)1(s3, rec of kr:w Art::_.r * . 1,;14,s, ,s d-,Ily appntd qu,)11fd gre-.1 ,:ctg guardian of E . Henrl, Priebe c..:11,: .L...fred Priebe , ineompetent rversons pursant to th ertn ,rder of coo.rt dtd J , 5 51 07vuElF- No. 71381 rec of ir(116 to il.nti...1. 01:11,: ol "Jistrit ro , 403, 1.ccw fl: cP-w to so flre ::=14.; in That portn of Henry -'. . Tobin i on.?.tion Claim No. r daf : .r.:,e .; at tt 145 -2 ft H o-:' the S..8 cornr of a.- two-13re tt cyd to M: tchell b-s; Cba-les a,-1.:Ihn, or 26 U0 sd .;ornr Ilei!‘g _ 77 . 12 cornr of Block 25 of the T'Ain of Renton acr-!,7, tc., tilt tilri 1.4.--c Vol ] I' lats ,,?t,, 135, tee of sei 3o; th V 155 1:t. tr% to - 4L ft; ',11 l'.. 1---.: ft tb th LJ 15 1—_, v._, „ , ,-..0, : cc:L.it -',cle -1 :7',-- ,. . cf vet eo: for ,,trect p'Arp.„.se6 ; . . r . EdwarA6 as 6uly aTionf!. --.pr-, t(4 r.,uardir. o"' ry .),‘tee ,;uarlian oi H.:_nry Incompeten i..'.=r1.;on kcw FWD 3 51 by hrtLur 7 , Elw,.:rs duly ar,Dntr!' qualfd guarddan, of Mr y r.. rebe , Henry %nd A-fred Priebe _ Priece klm (coritd im eL ) , --,,...... .4e,..,,,.... , bt.. .gskv-,--,4--4•60- .r.e.,..: ,. .. . Lr1. „ _ ,_ 12o50 - 2 all Incompetent Persons, bet i fmges N . Ricnmor I 1 -k•P 'pea at s ns May 1 54 im, m _ , , i for wn ..enton,Wr 7: 3TC0 klm \r- .......... D Feb 28-51 4112787 Nov 20-50 $10 $2 .20 irs $2 st Mary Mu3sacco, as her sep est To Renton School District No. 403, King County, State of Wash_nzton fp cy8 ane wars to sp tte fig re sit in kci Baap 1512 .72 ft W and 1136.52 ft N of the SW cor of blk 25 of Town of Renton, ace to plat throf recd in w1 1 ;,fplats, pg 135, reeds of ad co; ;h W 72.6 ft; th N 275 ft ; th E 72.6 ft; th 3 275 ft to the pob, in Secf18, tp 2 N R 5 E WM Mary Muaauc000 key/ Y Dec 9-50 by Mary Massucao bef E. M. Conklin np for xn res at Renton (ns Mar 7-52)Ail to Tom Dobson & Son 911 3rd Ave Renton, Wn *RES* J i D Aug 4 -52 42`)96 4 Jul -5 $10. $6.60 Iro $6. eta( '1'X k"D 055205 Anzio F LAvir$1 ►i wri n►t her sop ppty to Renton School niat;r1et #k03 King County Wohington fp Cy and w'1rr to hp the tOre sit in koit That ptn of the Donntian Lind O1aim of Diana B blathers freely Dimnn B Tobin a wd r%nd the }oiro at :,ow of henry N Tob doss daeignAted nm O1mi$ Xo. 37 . anM baying is saoi 17, hand, 19 twp 23 N R I WM (WI Imp p (70 It of tho Rg ooa+ of A 2 Aori tr of nd sold to D C Mitohsll by Charlos Fran 'd Apr 26- 1900 Osd oor by 1077 .12 ft W And 1136. 52 ft X of the 0 oor or Bik 2 in Town of 1anttx: at per pits that zoo in Vol 1 of pits on pg 135 rea or singc�o) th M ,5rhthW110ftth 375 ft thS110 rt to trio poly sat in the C of Renton kOw. X o n ok ml to Tom Dobson & sori 911 3rd 4. Rohtnn Wn f 1 t1 by _ 11T0 1413 • l 4 D July 14 54 .sw:•• June 25 54 $10 `c.8. 0 IRS 8 ,O�;.� 3TX t� ' Hannah Oja a w1do to Renton Schcc1 District No 403 King County, State of Washington, a nun Corp C & W Ptn of H M 'robins Donation Claim daf: Beg at the NE cor of Victoria a Kelly Addn to the c of Renton Vol 23 of Plats pg 2 % roc of s4 co; th 290.4 ft- th 3 100 ft to true pob; th 3 175 ft; th 8 96 ft ; th N 275 ft; th U 16 ft; th S 100 ft; th W 80 ft to the true peb XCN OK M1 Tom Dobson & Son 911 3rd Avo Renton Wn Fid by STCO hb r 0 ,.i . i.• .. ' Fred f•Iarcr:ecti and Max'61•:Sri r..��� . a�'chett i, .::;: to Renton .,°;(:GL,Z District No 4V3 Kin. Cu ni j State of :t13int;ton 3 'flUni..L a1 corpn cy & w That portion of fenry H. -Wobl Donation Claim No 37, degc a3 roi3 : Bet.; at a ,: ;. 217 . 80 ft ','l of the SW cor of t'Y, acre tract of a.'+x land cy to David C. Miteheii b y deed Feed :radar and ;'lie No 189971 , rec of ad co th N 12' t th W 7 2.GG% ft th S i2y.LO th L. 72'.F;.. :'t- to pob ; exc po:•tic;n t::or lyin of a r: parallel wi and ;.OU ft ily of meaLlu:e:: at right angles to the Ely in of lot 16, in Olt: 1 of victoria A. K,.11y Add. to city c:' Renton, acc.Drd to plat f rof in vol 23 of pits, pc, 24, rec o_ad co and Nly of the Ely production of the Sly In cf . d lot lt;, ac:n oi: Fly ..3TC (M1 - Tor Doo3on b: Son sill 3rd ave Renton, Wn 0jr J�� 1ja ti -4 - •L' ♦ ♦ :o 4 �_ J tip_ • ( t:ix shown ) uzur?el Delau.'enti, also inown a3 Ja-o, elaurent 1 : a bachelor on April %' - and Theresa Dela::rtnt - h.if on April lv - 1 date of acurin` title to Renton, School District Nc 403, King Coo" a municipal corpn cy & w • Lots i�. and .14, and 15 bits 1 Victoria A. :teiiL Addition to city of Klditimxx Renton, according to plat thof reedit vol ,✓ of pits page 24, rec of sc.: co ):c n o f 110 (t41 - Tom Dobson Son :.i .;rd ave Flo STO ci ij • • 12;7 11/4.y :.ir:.�. .,;: a *ik ryf . ; -'+aa•-�. ; �.-;j.;. �; �_ C. �. . ... i"S. :r. •• �`:"{.i••'�?r `r' YY � � .'_F � r .t i`W ��::'.7• r• �':- �'4`���. - :..�T,..; ,.�y�� ti�P .•r.TL• � , .+•!?•';. ..kj - �. 1 4 44 �v).: AugJul 5trx Jean M. McCollum and Lee Roy McOcillum,her nus nuw and on Feb 24-54 date of acqrng title to Renton School Diatr:.ct N o. kO3 , King County State of Washington,a municipal corp c&w Tht por of Henry H.Tobin Donation Claim No. 37,df : $eg at the SW cor of a two-acre tt of land conveyed to David C. Mitchell,by dead recdd in t vol 254 Dp 140 roes of sd county; th W on the S In of the Old Fuller Place 72 . 6Oft ; th N 129.0Oft ; th E 72.60:t to the W lr of sd two- acre tract ; th S 129.00rt to the pob x c n ok Lake Co Montana Aug 5-54 by Jean McCollum and Lee Ro McCollUm,bef N. G. Cherry npfor Mont rea St Ignatissx(ns ) commexpra Aug 29-55 Mlto Tom Dobson & Son 911 3rd Av Renton Wn; Pid bySTCO vls "J� �yQr E-.. t. D A► s 23-5k OAX 4478285 10 Jun 23-54 $10.00 $101i. ira 4i.QQ gtx laus-enti end Corot DE�1aurQnc:, hwf �a etoRenton School to District N*. 403 ECW a 0iur.iaipa1 oorp • :: t 16. .blk :1 Victoria A. Katlly; Add to the City ot. il let . $sntvn .. 3V 4 e Pa and tbla�-W1y 5 ft in Iitd oth* ptn of Rater Tobin ;',100onatioiCiais No. 37 lyim k3r`' of lot 16 bik I ad victoria A. Kelly z Add to the C of S Renton and t►etw the 317 production of tho N and 3 linen i of ad let. "1."16 xera ok .. ',�• . i t 0 m1 to Lora Do son & Son. =tag Retlton,tin gQe •KI1 r \, J • DF-c 2 2-5 4 _ '- • D- 1-54 $1 l': . irs $13 50st: ( xxy.p No tax sr.a ed ) Ivor Williams and LizaWilliams, nw, to Renton School Distr ct No . 403, KCW, a municipal Corp C and 'W` That portion of the Henry Tobin Donation Claim, deLcribed as follows; 32eginnir3 at a pt 280 ft E of the SE cor of a two acre tract of land conveyed to David C. Mitchell, by Carle4 Brun on Apr 26-1900 by deed' recordedunder auditors file ,#189974 th E 134.5 ft to the SW cor of a tract of land conveyed to Renton School Dist . Noz 403 by deed recorded Dec 23-49, under Auditors file No. 3970324; th N along the Mt Wly line of sd tract 300 ft; t;i W 134.5 ft, m/1 to a pt N of the pob; th S 300 ft to the pob; Except the N ft thereof conveydd t for st . purposes by deed recorder under auditors file No. 245468; and Ex:.ept the . 15c-, ft thereof . XCN OK Ml to Tom Dobson & Sons 911 7rd Ave Riftx Renton Wn . Jhk • • ti ti ^r .0 C7 •' 4.st" ':�11'I1j;t,.iJC'i p,:• i.0;. ..r';.. rl.:.#..� .4-j; L+p ... _ r.•.. ,.....e. ".i rai=:f '��•�• �r '.:eji. iJ i,r.µ:.t: w�i:T �^i i �'�'2 3�.r`.y:S 2�. :�'�..�-rwaY•}.,''i-Y.;�I 7.r r r y!•�`;� � � j:.:A i� ��:� ')���. 1 L.� .r.�: y 4 -"�P.._{+p. . 2 Y y1,` 17'L t r C� Y'i=. ,• .;+_ :r 4 0 i.) Oa i . 4: 4; 4 _L. ',ir 1",;' . _ Y2 . . _ : .• ( x.- 4. ....i t__ i Henry Mudf.•.23 and 1;11r1. .it.t!_$ 1,(..uCq , nwf i to Renton ScnoCL Diotrtut No. 40.. Ki r.6 County , wa ;,ii-.6toci An u.ndty one-half Int i n and to tna fig; deand ppty : heap whop la tt,e L itrectn of the cntt: In of :;eean,0 Avenue and Shattuck Street in the City of ilenton, kcw, r. rc; th N O ' E 63y .6Ottt' th N 6O°13 ' W i46.07ft ;p the true pob ;th .. .S °35 1,5 h 18t�. u5 ft ; tn 765O' 15" E 1b4 .31 ft ; th S / I - / 89°241 L 195 .E+9 ft ; Lt. NU°36' E 318 , ycft to the true pou , EXCEPT EICEPT per tthof, If any ,wL'6h,Ln the bed and snores of the black Kiver au they were sit when ad river ceased to be / a navigable strum. c�A.t...., ...„.., r << o ; 3 ' Z-Iir 3/`ti' ' raj i i xci; o;-: ) M,Rito Tom �baon x 6on +i1 3d Av Rentor.,Wn; lid b} STCC 146506 via • Ocl O 1" Jtst •Sfl .al7:. .3.•:'!CN!..z 47:..�,. .lS:r:�•t�'h r.,��.a Y` ..�.'i�A�'�.` ilL. "_r '���•;ii ••• '.•: ..i'• +K•••t-• .�.i.�..••;•! - .',�.- I• Y..f7tt- i;• tr a.y • •• '.•.i:' ih • �.,. •.a. '1 L• .t. �!, •�� r.'. � i a�t1 :IC v �'et"r H. L•' : �•. .l '•� .�:''�•.'1. .-_ .':5• . '.r ri'•t..rq y*{•:'E''/'ri•'.� ` •,��. •j• �i• +'.t�..r ,. '" y1. .d ti t �,::� >' :•'.w:� ' rf ,Y _ 4�:,r!i_� 11.''4. r t r.r` 4. at''••' •: a�..if 1j ••>i i:.i'"'- ..i, `'f ,4 . r I i-itr,rj M weo , sumac:!o. of tr:e eat, of Jos.4,n Moue.: , ,:.:..0 to Renton School. District No . King Coil►.:ty. iad:rilatc;r. :I! o LI :,vy V An undiv one-half fat in and to tnta f'lg deabd pptj : .� liatap whch is the 1.ntraetn of tree cntr In of Second Ave and Shattuck Street La the City of Renton, kcw, rng th N O 353 E I.37.oGft ; th N80'13' W 346.0'(ft to the true pob; th entnff, N 884131 W 3114 . 43 ft ; - th S 2942J5115" $ 188.65 ft ; th S 7"50115" E 164 .31 ft ; tb 6 b9°241 195.49 ft ; th N ;,;°3b 1 E . 318. yvf t to the true pob , composing 1 .8 a•;res mrl This deed i:: g.1.ven pursuant to Order Confirming Sale a,,trd on Nov in the ;,uperior Curt of the State of j Washington, Cause No. 132507 in the matter of the est of -Juseijh MoEiea , dcsd irm x r n ok Mita Tom Dobson • Sor;z y11 ;d Av RentaQWn; r'ld oy STCO I vla(\ {�.i:tV `�,t Yii r����h‘.•w , .. ... v. / ` ;ti•• •.Y�. .. .r.i .Y,. ..nio' •'i d.:'..•� + :,Y�i�. .}Y 0 f ` ., i �w 0 0 Isg D A p • r 11 - 4x.0 r~ 4 a^`'3qr, ar ,,Pr ',5 $iU• GO 11. �� ii•a : 10.50 stx it . D Fred Turner and Mary Turner , rwf to B henton School D.atrict No. 4t43 kcx ht to of t. e henry h. Tobin lionation Claim No.37 inaec 18- 2345 ewe. , kcw dar: beep 1077, 12 ft X W and 1136.52 ft N of the SW cor of ' blk 25 Town of Kenton vui 1 pits p& 135 kow; sd pt being the c D SE corof tnttwo mu g acre tract oY land conveyed to David C. Mitchell oy deed recdd underaud 'e f1 No.189S71; th E . . 62.5 ft to thetruepob th N 300 ft th E 80 ft th S 300 ft th • k W 80 ft to thepoc; axe trieN 25 ft throi' for road purposes and as exc the S 15-) ft t:.rof 0 tri Zen ok alto Tom Dobson & Son Renton, Wn f idby STC0 #k68818 gde R E iminiarilkori J ' J i; .,0 . 0 x J e �' . ;.,, `` , . . • .... - - _ -. _ f `v<< /Y ,�s a _ /` • y f c"d "e.'„larly 'r f orIs •(CI.�.e: 71 -R': Y� 11 - ..3 ... ' the 8 ove-er.- t1eC court for a decree c- 1 10 the ^iz:.ntiff, Renton - _. N . 7. €c ea•.i r.- ti,y an.., throughC- i!35 C. • 7:- - _^-ec•.tir1 Attorney, end the a:.ou It of , awarded for the taking having been C9t3r".`L l8d --rn jury, and a verdict Navin teon mmmw ._.1.0 V the"eir1 I'.,8vii�t been s nec, to tree court that the award r,. "::. L.'.. . .. ...e._� ¢,-,_ _� appearing..:_ '. r 2a a ::ud:-..r.ent as teen paid to the Clor'.'! of the 1111 n t 1.einE fully advised in the premises, ncii, irml ray« ;,.:. _ •� be �• -.:.F.. •C^ JR "� L'J..�.� AND DE R::LL3 t:-!3t. t.^.5:'C •'7.1fa ^ r red and conveyed to the plaintiff, Renton ,110 _ tafrr` ",ct V 3, the foi10 i described premises in }#yp:;, :,:unLy. b 4,1 fix$ ; �` =.. __ 2err? ? =c�,n Donation Claim -.�7; �, J '-esCr_cea as follows: / 'xt'" feet Kest Of the EOI:�:l- -'`l , - e• two-acre tract of land co;,vP:.e; 'pan- aria W1,n� .•��•;,. cfa ±' it�. •r nL_ :: 1 C. ::'tch'11 recorded d '', by deed r:Q under ... ,,� . '• _� r .'r_o ? C. 1 ,c rl, recor?s cf said a. Y:'K' i. .e ce west cr the south line cf the Old 11 - :4 _ feet; thence north 129.JC feet; -`.ce f; -'-o. east -2.C_ fee thence south 129.00 feet ...re, 'Y " : '--rii.,,;,-•y,--.4.,-Lv-:-1,,,,.:.. l','Itt 'OE,r . ,--.,avir..... • ' '",z,.,-VNIrg.,--A71-1.4.,7'14,.-1,p,74..i. ;•;-.','.”....,..4irv,Tp!.....!--.--- I., ., .,..,..,.,,,,,c,,,,...,4 itt . , , . -r,^1/2,F- ' vt,pz tc ,-..f.r>r, 41.-3-,,, AN:-,.74.11,40 . .4%. ..,..;::., ,, 31111.111.119 :,_:4%.,i-, .,, n %, 4 • . % ...." '.' : ,,,,ya- ,,j,* - 2.••;,,,C,A,4.7,I.-NO '.:, , ......b INT- 42 •• ••••1' , - ,-.et• .. ,-. 4.••-•n--... ..:,.•,i,..-024.,,...—P. - • „.. • . . ' . si. •. -. '.- `.- • •.• c" .., .. • •.1 • ,: •f I 'i n• ., '. • .1 . r .. •;i D • ... .r ••f ':-. ••i .' •• .1 ;I . ..-I ': :•. , . • . . •• t•• ,t, .•1..J .‘g •• • :I ! . . (t •t 'S ••, , ,t •)I .- VI ' .1' ll • e ,c•t ....• • • i , .- \ . ,.. • e•... • . c , 1 N.. .. ..,. -t: .- ... .,. k., k c: x,, , •,1 % 1 ‘..c's • ( I tr2 iS7.: ().-.)c2 1 0 A ] .,.. ,. Ivor.,A, '. V...1,,• .... . • . •, • • ' il'4''•1 • . ... ,, • , , i • ,••• ‘• P...iffr y 4,,,:es-, •,-;., 3 4, •,:,6 t,14.4. t:L....,, :. . „ , ,,t...., ' . ,4:, ',•, , .. , ' ;1,1'AV ,_,,,t,.• 's •^ • . . . . . .. . .,. ,.....: 4.........,..... .,,e.,....:„..7.,,,,...,• :, , . . • . • . . :.,.c., . ,?..---„ i -, V'Ya. 5" 1; l �',�y�L'V iiriv j. •r4V i iif• "A-,• +a g: ;:Y.V'�j..`.,.4,r,j,,,VV ;•`�. ••tigo,4rr.— :-r' �;4•42 t '; fir• :n thti JU'` . in ?r `� ., ,i T , _i L. "'` _;ientorf_ I1. . . .. , ,.. . � r.Ju_ ;T :tobinrion Wi.laon and Marian W lson, hw, t};,. Pirs2 Ve,.er'al . vir:gu LURn A3soclatlof ">'• pt Renton , a cnr.p, Court or(,-.1 r 3 tht t nere De and Is nby app:op and `,rid ,i to the plrr, liz nton School 2)ist No 403 the rdre In kew Tht k. t1, ore Henry H.Tob, n Don C1a !m No 37 d f; ;Zap 72, 60 ft U of the SW oor c.:' a 2 ac tt of ld c d to David C Mitchell Dy deed rep, urderf and rile No 189972 rec •-'.. ad Co th W on the S line cf tht' Old :caller P1 72. 60 rt, t?l - N 1^9.00 rt, th E 72. h0 rt, th 3 129. 00 rt to the poi_ Cart to be: true Iopa by Co C1h Jul 16-55 (M2Ja� �. k M. ,3wayer, 60'_ Co- ity a) p{ 1 . u CS; Mi.. «1 ' 4.4, .lam 4"''.* . �� � • •... � ' ` i• ,• �. . "1ti 4 � • i'•.i t •r..;4;.44. ��r ..,,^••fit � i 'r +• *' ". . 7:f•.'e-..'f: • ,. �"\ .. �:1 44• :• �....': J 1 .� •; :.. •' 14 r..�r.._.. t r, •t.4 `r!:...•ti•f•f trl env find all leasehold ietprvte and sppug*erdanza ni-,w °:- or hi'afti r owned bl.• the eitgur sndplaoad upon ad 1eaaeu: .., prom by t rit tgo,s . ri ' ; r ! ' .. 2 . Feraan3 1 pty : z`;` All leasehold issprita and appurtenancea,fix:ure,a, ..,: furnitue, machinery and equipment t of whatsoever nature now or hrafter owned or used by theatgcr in cunneci.ion with '. its operatiar. of a shake pronesss.ng business upon the a ,v -`' desud leasehold, including buv not limited to, shake - manufacturing aaohtnsa, else squipmont, rotors, etc . -_ , =:„;41 A/at of Koh is aatAirok forth.. hrio wch covers, machinery, motorr, blowerar., sa1*$s., office fiqUipaent eta , , tsp of $30,000 with int thran free dt unt11 pd at the rate of 6% pa act) to cod pbl on or bet90 dys trial dt of sd note - , . Non of the personal y:y consisting of leasehold i mprvtq .: ®aofireryy or agaipsfont shallbe removed tra the place abv . named without the written consent of the mtgamee . The mtgor shall have tuts rightto sail the a?,v iry - • 0 and tfelien of tie otg snail extend tothe proceeds derived free ach sales and any accounts oraatd with respect to such . ales . This lets is nub only to Cil dtd Oot1-5 gvn by the► atgor to Prank . **torsion, Jr. and only to theuctantof p speoif los1.4 included in sd atg . ,;• (can 't)res $. . .. _ ' ' . . * • ' . f -j,i :4 ••r.,'. . tili. •1/ � '!7r• i►ZI*_••i.I.• �r:t".,�:� •• ^ ;• /. h�' `Sr,,.a tf • •.'. ..j...dam' : �r�.�• ?. :•I:G.' � ,� 1!—'t!. -t 4. D Jug. lza ,!,;44 . Jul _ -55 4,11, - : David Mitchell and Julia ?�ttc`�el1 , hwf 7 • • To Renton School Dttstz•'_et No . 403, hind County , �s _ Washington - cy and war Thatptn of Henry H. Tcbin DC daf : Beg at the S E cor of a 2 acre tt u d to DevidC. Mitchell by deed read invol 254 of deedapg U0, edpt being 1077.12 ft W and 1136.52 ft N of tt the SW oar of bik 25, Town of Renton, 1 of platapg 135, th W alg the S lnoted Mitchell ttl 194.40 ft ;o the true pobj th N 275 ft tothe S 1n of Tobin Ave; th B alg ad S in 4 ft ; th S 275 ft ; th W 4 ft to the truepob 2on ok Ml to Tom Dobson do Son 911 3rd Ave , Renton,Wn *RES* • i�7 is '4- '.•y• f'f r s �: •'.pr '_' a ., D Juts b$b-•>b £,y 14-5b $1C $12.1110 ire$11 at �, �`. . • .- , • George Fabre and P uiina tebre , hwf it To Renton School District No. 403 ! cy end war II e Thatptnof thoHenry H. Tobin Donation Claim No. 37, tp 23-5 3WM aft Beep anths S that TCbin Are, ' 20 ft M of the N3 oar of a two acre tt deeded to David Mitchell by Chao . Bruhn on Ppr 26 -190° by deed reed in vol 254 of deeds pg 140; th 3 122. 5 ft ; th W plw the S 2n of Tobin Ave 83.81 01 ,214 ft, rarl, to he SW oar of a tt of 1*nddeeded to George Pabre ier and Pauline Pears, hWf by daed tiled under and is fl Na 2104714; th N 1°47 ' 3 wlg theW inof ad tt 122.5 ft to to S In of Tobin Ave; th S alg ad S in 80 ft to the pub . G� • xon ok • • e M1 to Tom Dobson & Son • ;�11 3rd Ave, Renton f ld byy STco Ns #517294 'ABS. 1 n \\ ) l Z ti JL • • D Se 1�5'j48315884 ' ••,.-� p 48315 • Jiul 15-57 $10 $4.95 ire $4. 50 at Jean M* McCollum .arid Lee Roy . McCo'.1;t, elh To Renton School District No. 403 cys eoci wars That ptn of Henry. fe. Tobin Donation Claim NO 374 daf. Beg at the SW ecr of a two acre tt or land oyd to'€.avid. - ! C . Mitchell by deed. reed 3 nv o1 254 Or- deeds pg 140., th W on the S in or t eoid Fuller. Plebe 72.60 ft ; -th N 129 ft t o the true -bob; to _N 14c ft t.othe S inof Tobin St in the: City of Renton; th Le al ad- S in 72 .60 ft to the is W in of ad two acre Tract; tt' S 146 ft ; th W 72.60 -f t to the true pob uc- Montana Jul 31-57 by Jean M. McCollum and Lee Roy RT ColIum bef N. G. Cherry np for 3t.. Ignatius, Montana (nos Auf 29-58 - MI to Tom Dobson&.-X .Son, f ld by SToo :#5.4: 028 *RES* • 1( • /- . . .. •r—_ _•.....:r. " - .._ ._NI.• _`. - •.: _z_ __ --tom_ - ...y VOL t��to PAC!') 0 w- V • •... • • . i. ,. A RECDP.CFO C_ - % . ' „:a�: 0: VOL -�.: - , ypars............ :EC. -_T CC • -%: .. C `\( - t ' ± • . L� C (it;l .26 Pb 3 09 a \\... ..\ , ITa �c,;<>o L� (i08ERT A. MORRIS t d0ITOR nt °`' �E C. MG COUNTY WASH. REco*° \Hs��t �--gip s r. DEPUTY OW , ,�•JNpt1TA, Qo � € O Z / Cu cw _J<^t11iJ� B. ‘, ..S D N g d .�Q .n 0 rY1 Fwm 467- I-RE: I::• (4 q ' % / Statutory Warranty Deed /TI•lE GRANTOR S, DAVM MITC?-t'ELL and JULIA MITCHEEIL, hi s w ife, • for and in consideration of T=; f.ND NO/100 DOLLi:nS, and other rood end value-le consider in hand paid,-conveys and warrants to RE::PQN SCHOOL DI S. I:T NO. 1.40 3, a asuni ri•-e1 a t c:, :.y cornoretion T'T the following described real estate, situated in the Cuunty of Kin c_ , State of • --• . Washington: T at -0ortion o" t;e Donation Lanc Cl rim of Di sna S-*,i triers, aoec:arraai "orn--1" Diana E. Tebt_r, a widow, ono the Heirs at Lewyof =enr} h. ( ._'f�; • • eeceased desi-nated as Cloin No. 37 end being in Sect ons • .a•'• ' 17, 1- and 14, Town-hip 23 North, Rance 5 Last 14.1'., deacrihed a • •,'•DNA rO_lowa: • :.W:,...MI: t Re,inrinc on the South line of Tobin Street.at a point 20 feet . •• < t of' the Northeast corner of a 2 Acre tract of—lend sold to D. - C. by Cherles cruhn dated April 26, 1900; (said corner `e-_Zt- 10' .12 feet 'nest and 11111.52 feet North of the Southwest col•ner of' El '-. 25 in the Town of Renton, as per nlat thereof recorded in aacugi•.•. ,' ".• • Volume 1 or Flats on prve 135, records of King County); :fence ..est .,'_`- 344'4 alon - said street tonr7in 20 feet;J thence South 122.5 feet; thence V. • '� cost ?-; feet; thence North 122.5 feet to the South line of Tobin \ g z street; thence est,k glow,. said Street rtergin, 65 feet to the point `';; . of becinninc; situate in the City of Renton,. County of hin�-, �tr,te "'••' ( n" \•avh?n-tan_II el f- is „,„• _ . by wyPi7;:)j J� '0'.•7, '':. : - • O Dated this U 22n day`of Oe t obe ,19 59. C s>fl G O 4 M .- • —1 �..._--- (mot-) • Z. 1 ti'�aii~ • act.' r LL!�..t %..(itit.) r r' _ilViL�.��*6RT NNGTON• . ,.. appeared before ate David Mitchell and Julie Mitchell, his wife :. • ' . _ s'Rw,,�aur • to zse se bee tfe individual a described In and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and �� t ' the s.:-e as • • actao.leajc�fiat - they aimed their free and voluntary act and deed, for the • '� j uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN under my hand and official seal this22rid dayof Ober 19 59. �tiJttiN�� . fa :fa,.:s Sisic o/ ita iiagtow,- - ..s:d;••[at Renton . .--: ,a i . �1� LAND/wily `isfwas!g 1! f MU. . •. STATE Or WASHINGTON • • t. IN CONSIDERATION OF_.-__ ($6,106_35),-_-..- __........_.__.........._.............. .. .. • N Six Thousand One Hundred Six and 35/100 Dollars, • I: the receipt hereby grant, • of which is hereby acknowledged,the State of Washington does bargain, sell a and convey unto.. .... ... - --- RENTON._S.cH UL 41STRL4.T_.NO.....403_.its. -._-_.-...._. _ -• • • heirs and assigns, the following described tidveae shore lands of the firs: class, situate in front of the • • - . Ci Renton King; • .,sty of -_._.......-..-- --- .... -- - -..snow---.........._..._.. ..T--_.County, Washington, t • • 1 . • • That p..)rtion of Tract 7, Second Supplemental :'naps of Renton Shore Lands, as shown * or the official raps thereof on file in the office of the Commissioner cf public Lards at Olyapia, 'a'ashington, lying north of the westerly production of the south line of that • • y portion of the H. H. 7ooin D.L.C. No. 37 in Section ld, Township 23 North,- Range 5 East. 1,',N,. described as follows: . • • Corrnencing at the intersection of the centerlines of Second Avenue anc. Sh:lr.tuc:. Stree: in the Ci: of F.e.:ton and run:ir.s thence ^' 361 C 637.60 inc:, the.:c.• Yc 3.� 13' I.: :It,?7 ice: the true '1oir.t of ,e'I'r:ir.., of phis (is:scrintior, ccrtinuin�, - ' t,c,ce % 3. I.' ,Ir .l Tee: tner•.ce `. 2j' 35' t,'• E 1 .,,.f.5 •ect t''er.e S 7' 50' 15" E . 1L1 .31 fret, tltc.c. _ 2r ' E 195.1:9 feet, arc :^erect• ,. 0' :61 C,,1.., ft... the _ try.. alit of ..e,ir.nir, ------ ------------- -- -- - ------ - - . - .- . - -- lso -Ttle a .,G hoo re wait •_..bed d.ait su et bse to as(re s- p. soot of I-' or, 11:o ..•f tl a.n. e.•,.. for• of IS .to.n r. r•-.l. ...el, . made.•d .YI rha shall be as ameba(upon tree(rant.•Poda0T•uecea.or In IDterwt of sand Contr..as though tel nut at 1.•nstn`le• .I. and. turner. . • Subject.In any Len or ben. that maw an.or be rn.lyd Ja.on.qurnre..1 or pursuart to the pr.nl•...r.•.f an oat..1 II'. 1+t1.1a:we of the Stale of Waaks(t,at. retitled -'An Am p[wcnbut the oda at moue. .• tW.•.lnt the toe. 1 navbratn.n n v he row .•te-t by pn- rote contract.prorldmS for Inns upon tate .ad abbrs. Ir+Y Mlnatoad to the,.late,ttaata( nthb.M-r as a.-t .•..and. Del....wow to th. stat.'approved Ilfarch S.I .. being chapter Pb at the$.su.m Leo.of 1471 e . - • "The meow hereby expressly sada.earepts am raarrve•..ut of In.(ran•hereby.made unto itself.Its s•agodo n and:e.l••D•forma,.all • orb (area e..a:.sq.a,minerals and Courts of every same.label Or deberlp:-on ar:J rh.rh ma.he In or spun.ad:and.ato.sr ilese tbed.K am, port thereof.and the mint to ear.ore tn.pine to.suers OIL Saar,cool owes moral. sD.l 1 ash. am Ir •lo t.e rib. eapre..ls saves wad i e..^rs-.snot sae the mast h.t.bp rude unto Its•,, rt..orn.aaor.and.saltn• tarever the right to orator hr Itself It. .err•- .!.,-awns and • a..t.upset said W.J.or any rat.n parts(tar-..' al ant awl all t•n•r. for for purr....of orogo mutt.Jew.l.y.•t.and a.•.\wile r• .tt.rrr.•n. . • an.1 (.air.[ rut .ad ay. .,.Inc Mg,:r•rn all fottt AI, good. also!- . ante,its and fort... and to that rn.l :n fu Iti.r ....••-•ls • •..ewe. •.1 It,[raga henell•.math.tmt..stall It.sure u••n rind dent!. 1•rs.! Ire dent los lie In.I !Weill.. •.twit. and •.I•tts..• at mos • all to,..-.to ernes. n.ttrurt. n.atat•L1 and boo all•Wrs bu.Illri• n.aeb.nrr) fads and roil,.at..••na ••.NI.hat..."-non.such All an.! to rem in no said lands r any pals thereof for the b.s-tma..•f:r.u.Ir.t sot to orrup. •. much .•( .sul I.rl.l• a• I.... Os D• '..n- •ttant ter it,,.usrwafut pr atoasa- a.wl of amen(nalrst b.ah r•t .•tsertt,..pre ' rs ry I..:loll I :-ell r st . y.r...•, •r.la •:tie . r I... . L• •4 "y a:•, bt.and In.to I to and a.rr sad lards rheths r 1.- Y M n rr1 .. n.s•4..r Dot se..•.n..ho. • _. e in.ro . ns- nt t..ran&r bear. A nandi and eltete•41 the doorplate.also,rn..,of it,.pt.grm. aM rich.:.1:..-I r.(.•e .s rr•,rs r.. P.....,•.fe l Th.tt n..In.:M.•1..11 U-es.Trio treat,thus r .- It• -an.s s'•ernatnun br It Stale . e.ts•d a [•. .11.1, p.... ..• r t Ina• I.e-t . aa ht to• soot. , • .tar.• to. pa 1.• - the• :tar a.nd u ••st p wh•twroth11..• rlr h y ta l• Ire f...\.rd•• tl..- ♦ .I•... .. • rQ ... . ..r sutr.t t'.'I.- •..tot.! 1',1! patty.rot . f••a•l d!-r_td ssntarned b.'lad..rn.r.1., rrao,n..f rahw :rp..n sa-I'art 1 - • • TO 11A1•E AND TO 11OI.11 the said pr••rnt..I's. wall their,:opartelinnets.lfrl'o the sand _ — RE'Cr.;!. SCI'OGt DIST?ICT 1.1, 1 is i!rlr.sat:d assigns purl err. %V!TNES' the St•al of the State, a'li.rt i this e .>a day of `��l�t�.•. _ /- • - • . • • , • r I SEALl �c: .I f y'1, t % - • -Attest: . c • • /a "i • !r , , ., . - ° k�\M/ / nrs7a • Secretary..l stare. ••.L• yr -. C. pool,. • ` ./ yet App.Na 2157 %C a I/']V State recora of Tide Land Deeds.Vob•m.' 23 . :'age 427 ..+- ,.{ .:..- Cont.No. - . • •.s•d roe RKO.d , ..It . ..- r• i7+ et: JC .�• CJa Q of / ,e f Y . S.F.Na."•S IY.67a *OR Ri .( MCQZIS !awry. A.A.,. C/1/ LL_, ..• lE, 7 21E yF'i -o s5s28'a =- . 1 ✓. 1,r o� ;, ;i.. ., -' q . WARRANTY DEED f .._ti ✓ , . . ; THE GRANTOR, WILLIAM FRANK BERRY, individually, as Attorney_; i • in Fact for CARL H. 'SMITH and BARBARA JANE CROFTS, and as Executor` ` of the Estate of GLADYS MARIE BERRY, Deceased, being King County `ti' Superior Court Cause No. E198458 for and in consideration of Seventeen Thousand Seven Hundred 4. Seventy Five Dollars ($17,775.00) in hand paid, -conveys and warrants • • ,r to RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 403, a municipal corporation organized v under the laws of the State oft shington, • the following described real estate situated in the County of King, State of Washington: �? %Y- - That portion of the H. H. Tobin Donation Claim described •i as follows: ` . Beginning at the Northwest corner of a tract of land conveyed to Lucinda and John Williams by Josie Janoski ' by deed dated January 22, 1909 and recorded in Volume 581 of '. • . Deeds, page 314, records of said county; thence East 80 feet; thence South 100 feet; thence West 80 feet; thence North 100 • feet to the point of beginning. i NO SALES TAYAIID this ]*/h day of August/ 1 9. • L� Ft,'S5thM �l st 2 21 IAH FRANK BERR • M. J. R. WIL_IAM , Individually, as Attorney in Fact for CARL aer. H. SMITH and BARBARA JANE CROFTS; and as ' ' Executor of the Estate of GLADYS MARIE .-' , . ng County Superior Court Cause No. E198458. STATE OF OREGON ) ) ss. COUNTY OF LANE ) On this day of August, 1969 before me the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Oregon, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared WILLIAM FRANK BERRY, to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument for himself, individually and as Executor of the Estate • of Gladys Marie Berry aid as Attorney in Fact of Carl H. Smith and 1� Barbara Jane Crofts, also therein described and ackncwledg=d to me :hat he si;r.ed ant sealed the same as his voluntary act and doed and az the _re and voluntary act and deed of the said Carl H...Sfiifth .no Barbara Jane Crofts, for the uses and purposes therein m@T'd's in: on oath stated that the appoir.rm:ent as Executor of the:,'ia .e-: nO • :he Fcwer of Attorney authorizing :he execution of this ir:';trument '''w^/ have not been revoked and that the said Carl H. Smith and'Larber}3, , 4. s . • ;ne Crofts are now living. • •.. •' • .4I NESS my hand and official mal hereto affixed the ¢ay arid • '0; 1 • �c _-ir :his certificate above written. 0 , ��/_(,• -+-1/f� --_ - ''•— .a - for '-; tare of ��� � •- •1'� •.'" ! - Notary ��lic in and o- � =. iJJ1 r?� .ding' at i aR c rrtsna styT agecatu afw!W7 Nactildhad tistateare at?V .•ad t'.CCetara•T r,•tag bon rum Oee••:I. aAeh 'r . (".,I_o,. J 4 2. �rc �rr-' ----.� \ Coss !/ r7 �� --- LOT j I ! igiamarst ti 1;# C,�.- : _12 _,If_ jC)),f „ /. I J Sgenefr Day , Ms_ . Yr. T, C614._ • A /rDATED+ {, ;` ''`4.604 4.7 . . tY<LYh�s 1 `, f !• 1.i) ;_I—�G Cl --- , ' i =• Acrob Li4 � FILED I ; 7 � rn. L ,-' - VV 16 .4d d a A co. we. ! 1� `r ` ,! , / ..".. ri- ., . t 1./.1.-t.ecc :"%i4 1 }`fir ••l �t!1 N. P,i,.d�a►LAs S Ji'. + rer.gel ' KY. Nyi s :. G b s r cam---R r-/'r. MOW I. p. k �'a big dic !aged is K. Ci ii'at '. •';1 -.- L ' t A b ---_—V,c.l. .L� ..S�S.irL/ _7_n.1 1. •�� . (!^I t I L. L _I4, c ?. 2..W if•? •• .. ' • __ 4Q. t1.A1/iw.f ll_ ..c)! •-t L c�� s� 111 f t �el� •7. �• �611—d—_ `—/ ;21 4*-2.4 ..ie• .. %, .�..L...0 . ='-^.- — --.4- — _C. , f...f- Z- ,.Y�_ - .f.,LIL�Z__.�o L.' L1t_ 1..Z. _1it- .a�P. _ .�v..C%_.... ---1 i •' P,. ^a. 4•1 •. J 3h�' OA 24.-•4 f A a C a_O lC2 ti �..t , , a"^tidetl�`�_-fG !.. a P. • -;` .. r,i. -.. p7orf...i.rr •.aes, r. Als.•. to+Mti.:s�.nw#q.:lLI.aI..., crawls1..ptetoo.aq� o'n '.. • .w - s a i.1.. .b } •r RY s i' I ' .f� j. }- It j y ��y�, "'it..' +7•L I ..,: �}� r •t' ..S �y / t i 1•x f. 7 i it a ^� �'. i.:' ., sC7r Sf---.�f{ 4 xi)9Fr : ! 4- qqti t r+ tti i�,11=' • �l i i 4 gr,04 1', .r N .4 i„-.,tIt�`` ,..';a 't, r .i..tt 7-. .• q . 't • .r V (Ih,jq'_••!r tb. .1 gin'. ,+ ri� r ,.- , x' r -it:.'`gt;5y 1 r r •i w� yi/•.., E I -. a v. . s ` 1 X !AA.• ....... s•C(+• • 'w', +: 5- . k 4 r .. ' �? 1 i s }x .'y''„I j 91. i�l• i' 7 I .4, i ' . JJJ000 ..�: t' t'1'4 tCt, JC .4.,.1'•' `Y '+�(ti`}, V! i' 1 yr t: ai1� a • • t' ,-',..• . 1'• t '�7 `ltri tf • • x ,j;r 1 • Me. •,11 SIT t o ,�y .T.i'' Ir•`.,,r' ri ti' i t *�..: ajw. 1 �� 4 hl. i m • �k� � 4 jIt' i I.1 �yq� [. •, l d +�. At = _ A. ,, 7 , tip r, ,I . ,T. ',i y $ , r ti t. f 1 r. t'.c.i i ,; 1 i r • 7 K 2.f�1 ,t •• yy�.y. ... ,, f 1 - 1't K,l �, kthil •+ ki.f is +� ,jj��J 11 � 5 1 �`1 - 7.. t pr YY. - i• .1 - ,f i:t it ".al {1171 ! 7-yS ,{ f., '.dy rwitr � 1 �571•.'. j},�� )) ( 1`, f t ;tt511'1 1i 7 • ;' t r t t • t •ts.. a I K' ' i'i`1 .,., i'.I+y,i 14`-.j ,' � 1 jy�, ty F li . 1 .. • I. ti ii' i 4..`"f1 r•t t 1. L -,i.. £{ I1. t ., t'i) 1 .y +d. 1 hi� 1 i ,• g A�' ii .4 s pp 1 '� I)1',,1 12 If l :`G I':+ Q s_6 r tr 7 rL • •i , 4 Si I: "1� NtT1 i iM#-J ;[I,j; •••;:j) r-, T .Iy • 11 • rvr+ ti • f•In r ' x 7 , l:r r•Ir ',.i.., erl., ".'t i :ji v.,id 1,; •rl +^ �, ;:.. 1• YrI ., 1• '...""�'` r p .. r .,. ,, 1- uai r ..% ,1.i i • r' 3 I I '� • , a ?. d4 ram' x J�ry�,p' .,. I ` 1 4 n l Zrt 1 I i ky �+l - !lle�e f • 1 T. • • `- a7 , nj 7 • a p " •s r ,. '1 5 l7 7g1` F ' i. { b { {ail 1. " • , 7 � I' , `/ . ' 0- = r.tl 7, t •t !t ! ..1 tr i'Y, , .. �J 11} I , y.. 1 iS it , J7 1 I is l "� 1iF "' 7 ,Ni- t I I` y�i Z,�' v'�L L i''^TT t �1, �( Y Y SsAI •,1 t[° V7 �.. '7 I . t• 'ir I. ,1}y a.,0 t. A• +'At 0:: 0, i el.-;,t ,_7:1 I !t44j d 1� i ' 4- .-'I ',r,o�1:„Vw}+ jr A �i r , 4,„' _ I ' I.k , �' #t ..'f?1 I,r1ra, ii. i F� 7_Ir,`f'''I I`-}0, '' r h; 1^j it ••t' 'Jl,e t`s;i 'MV• 44 i P:"1°;1 '.4 •I l i. c'4 V.:-.4':;..�1` `F ',1.7 1 IdY i � '�.p. i } ..t � r ,r'�II.. .•' f• et, s .• �,1" �• 1 1h'a 1 'bir ',�ji III i I.-''; I.•.'s * 'h .,, ( � p t..f ;.' 1 t n.'• r I 4 lit 11 tI•I ' w 1• :: I�."{i • II • t c 4:' Pk". Y '� ? • j1} S' • • p•f!7 3...71 ti11 '71 W l.'I•'+�' c 'rf,' '+if4>4 . 1 iIr .., , 1 1`� v9,1. f (' i'_ 4•''~1 • i t ii,' 7 i t '1 ti : tI $ :2 '�i5 9. i 1 �,,� ',�• u'x _'; i„{+ir. , q r,. iR .t $ T; 1 t^ • ` •11..4• I411 _f,,,,tt • ,.•{pr"�t •• •ti. ry fir'' i, +' ,il•b r ',1 1�•1 1 '!t'l.9> >r :`y,,t�'�' i'�i . i J ,, it v � T�d'�r1, lY t � 1 ,, r i 5+^ria i • �, �m i }, a 1 s f I IT;ht1� e r 4� 1+ raF I}i a`' ,.. a ).. ,ta la !, sr. .. t:1T:.r i'• ! ,„It!. + • i r t 4"''W's p' !'•�'7 _ Ir,�r at try 2•,i: I•. •'P'@,r , ly'.' .;.... ..-4. f'k5 {� • s r a ' 11;“1 s .I b 4.f`r`..,-, a-1� '1 i'(j�.'i�L• Yet it 11. r ii'Y 1 r ' • ' 4 I i l'. t, I 'r,�i/, i ,.:1 W 13' k t i Y f 7 ' I. 11�4;;.,,,,-:' +r•; � 1 11 I„e .s,^, i',rifiik.:. _. -µ1.J qn ,,, 4.1- ; j I, ehi s +� r = r$1. II i�' r 5 d; Ve ' t le .'t Y I i i' • ssY 1 '� i 1'r J F nr •I ,1 rt 1 -r ,SP = 1 11 IF.Il r, .'14- :,,, `{ y. kd r, '":,. •r 1' " N I. F.. j 'y. • I i !S- ql : i i;IC= .r" e-"1 7, r a•*•" 1. I:1 1 (j,61'1,1; .,'I'r[ i. ,-..4' — t,i •;:i�r. 't'�:{ f.n _ '� 1.; "5 '{ate n s > r-' 'I..'1 f '.1 r°:1 ,,•♦. r 1. , • I • ! ..:!.,- .f I ((1�� r j1 '. -T7I r. . t• + • „ '• .. • !' .. j li r 1 11 01 +-r 5 4(., i-y ] 11 '•I n 1 .. ' • r.• II g: '• ij C AO: S '4•qq f ri I 5 • +I ' -• . 1. 7 .J• • jlr t` t+,l ah t 1 $. L a t'.. .y 71. �f I I i' .n�i •:'� •;,ft I I .i, Y •.I•. 10 ' t, r' 1 D D • f�k4 t • 971 ry • .i y, s �w rli L: •l �A+ j j ♦.t' ; 7 .} • k,•if -4•l•4<)r • j•4i S,._ ,,4 e_'Ll •, .t - • i _^` IIE¢}l. �• _ 5 _ 4 +• ,}, Zr •• + -..,A., x 'lW7T x L g ^�.eo f \ !! -?r3 D `�,`4e� � rr 'j:S c i» i sj+.^r'R" ' {"�n', rr '•S J 7yx , ha , aI•nit•'t 2 +t.. 's i s 2b �i. ,} ,,,V- S .4 ' s + /4.••i0 ,9 it't . Ir a sa $. "` b'J @Sit.:. i�,'4. $y�o•S �.K^rt > A.a eF F 4. 1 'Y N S Yd�'}A .•J • 10 f y. '1a , - <} 1 ,. .. ` yi'' '4i r 1 W Y as•>i`. ly S,X.';r„ _ if a '4 p !d a XE xI'F g x'& '> `k'�'+A - wi .. ••�t x ' YF to 5-'3�t'.41 '. r ku 1,0e•rr �i ,A �f .L"' t,',', wS, k e y t•<4 i ' ; " y t t:%r•.'' �Ar'�'S k.. +• he 14. ". kti ';$� � x� °�i1� p`s ¢`°" yx y�'"y 7R i,, s`f s ey • •• `f 2 i+,ii ai" $ .,'i}0i+ tga ykj•v,pih,i itt X 3k t F .4 •s, aM 3*,arekz Y 1, •r y . y rt i {; 1" .f'l5 $F�"v 7.ds.%,:',4�ii,. Yr fd`".a,} °I � '1 A'xx e Y F'4 .' ;? i.• � � 1 1 4 ,t -1 1 A .7*14 Ffy` 1 ' s � ... ,4 ., �' '4 C'��' t. Ji f ,h 4 'r,- $ .e.e.i S.36u.. g t' !� o T ''A,,n�•,a '• ��5 sia• '� �.s.a }'y�, y' 42. .. 'i T a w 7e T 'k' •' 'V rt .. 4 a,.,.p .r4F;10;, qx.._t�+,`s ;' .Arr°b A• `�a3.f.,i {r 73a,= r t t,,, aF. �'A a-, . J F $,n..a ,. 7& r"s� a..f .y 'j ei`.s g. a' , •9p .`'e' .'S .. "it t i A:1 •�x Y 5 y.yp Ol.,�;- • A c+ C tlC'IL.‘'• ; Yts„u�+ i 41.1 } u f,0 440 r k..i',ik,4. 'dei*7 D `;r!Z, y'� , r2")', �"a".0 M , ," '�_.'y t . a ry,„„"'l kFr,.ci !� r 0:,, •',, . ry.•1'x.okr, ! 1fi> •'..1, ipl '''v r _ F.h 1 � a 7 "�> A�'�e�D• Aas•�,.v �' '� !�'' �� b �' r �,n ti � r• t v fit, . ., f p A' lotte y i Fr 21 q ;,4, •f .gam.'Ak"'�W�, o .4.• q 3, 'P. y.'�M• •J. } .Y: v;; 7:a9F� f r; ;.. 1 :rr Y �i t v,v,.. .Kit,-41� r +P.4letl y�'-- a 4,11 11Q `•t� j, 5 t :::N'F7 'f!?' ,, lrT yy ' i'•-. t,.—.!-A-d Bp 2) '�� '.,• ,„. �. l" ri'V..:-,,t ,. �a a,5t •s: 7•�v�f ."3J yf. v° b .' i - ta `'. t '. c"r,..iti,f.s y rt x 'S5}Ei,V �� +L "; 'f w a�,!•�9�^5A�;k .},,i k ".15 r:U fv ,Y , }'}h.yp t 4X,+ 'Vi,y.°f° !; ��t,�T yr 1 �$ �1 �'�.1M,'.TbxC :�,{q ; f r t s tla °�++�x ' s+° w " ,bc r �`tt.�M ss 't�. rN rg :gyp,• + r Pon ,. �... ,. 4•a'.-er*# W4 err:'A a> • . �' r St � '� e�.e� "aJ{ygxX a, q { S t g #4s Rs ,k 7es �, .s {,,S i t,bvu '�1 A',3t({,� fit' ny� F K i q '1 5 4 1 D .Y ! a3 i [ `S.iR. jT " 'S J �f H , &:"tidy 4.10 r Ic' iyFjti,7-,,,,,,-IV,-4),, ... g,1 3P P" a ��a ,�pi �. a'' .a•�5' • `t y A,�3+ fry Y,, r• €y4��t 1 t ar1, a �,..? it w� ESLi ft7,Y 5ift a?• i ta' •i''Astiri.- .I 7t-t,'�y.•v 14.4,1 tyC`Yi 'j { 4 }4•'4.4 {s Pam".. 'I r: ' I.idf Z }J �r ° } .t 1.� ` 1 �/{tq f !w`r'1 S � A 7 � {§, 1 } a; . $Y „ '? 0-t"��D et??15 k : e, $: eyfg� •2 ..:;, i s.t t q °t y:ef* e• '• a -' e r x r L if' ,.+ F q d D ' r^ � J �r i� � iv Y:� -5 i r i. . t �• t 3F g yip z�`1 v�'.,{SS 1 ® "6J �` +.�4>< 6�o 'sr n e u J` f F + .. r aT` g>L1't '�'42 .. k >�.. T'`i o-..'44 r , Fil i e. `,'ip,.t. ,4'4�, .t V #S' a 1 T�''e a r X 5 .1 `v :ti r•74, R 'D9 a' ,3 r b �' t r ? r,„'1vafi a 2 �e, Aso x a • �Ir • �«'t v,.¢..24 •Tao. f.. s ,, :Nw '•; i at kl 1 �.» • .,. t, ,,,) ><-y 4 7 ,3 /2 afkv;v..y�'i KTi,Asf �r. ' ,./ �.'• Y41,4 'k,+ a [s.rrt f ,��.� .p� t t l ii Ss3 € !} N t D '» • ` r, yes i t ^7:_ , '!�. �� to 8A"''.!y`1`, :'' +' +vt f •.i`^pi' 1 ,s- 'f' }, a i a: a,S4i` gSE "` ', ... !` t fit , .,,,.- r 1 �P v F,+"i } ,- < yy�� I�++ y ,St ftti Y f.4 v a .� D .,+ J .i aIt* :t '�5i'1:$ arb C .W. l �X...(• kr �r.1' 'a� )SF ' ` •�A %¢ Li '�'k'fi:i '�•«S..lt ?>'? v�lk "i ;fix 4` n _ ery..h i>A , t.Y Sta ,.v' 44. .+y - s f 4 `v } t xg f"'!!#rk�YL t.t i:. `i;:kii, •:•C J-',R.Lr a ?,D _•- y • i-:7 YA.' y, ii'•" 2I .' j D. A.74- ..t . , `t{ry� z' .k '?2•-• K tii'. {,6 .. ,(.• �!S a lt, a 'f K� 'SCi 3 4 x , n.•.k; ,,.rto 'a'4�' a:, z?. .L. :...t J '' .14o xr '.♦ '�L•' st1 :! • y4ta �,;! �6y c; 2ae�#Rtv .�. 1 9 at r a.•� ?t z• iM� ! +k : w4 . v ts4, S •' t' hid a ; f. to , sD i l$•,!£ 7�{ � i •t 'F. !� y, ro+�� ,�? n f �� y a.�1ar i '#b 4 t ,-,.,,,I, Q .0 '1 ' f d` s \ S.y,4 •t 5.7 aip 2y'�y�i 4f 1 d<i f ..re {'r •+ yyr .' N ' Yr D.rr,°x+?`� . t`4 ti.t 7�r )e G C-..71A4 `SeAf�.�Y i Z'/.kf i 'I Meta N • �� r ,� j.4 'a; E.S A a 4'3 il.l , r., -?m �,17•4.k['y.:,•! *_.t. ,'•tl { [ .e 4 .' . • t .-. i y Y 7 ' i t 1 fi4�a >' ?t3 e i y 4 9 n. s t { 2 • ' A s, a e r + • k 41 i • '. ' 4 _ • r • • D Plc! ?,b 2-09 594247 1 • Dtd 3600. Joain Ja noeski yid of John Jarioski dead of Rnnta n K C I 4o Luc : n 11111:ms and Sohn Williams 1i h Pp cb a c e to sp ha f did ]leer: U Un iv t int in the fol daochd prcperty: 96 ft of the 1 end of tha, f•tld : Coracng at a pt on the $ line of the lily part of 47 se tt of the H H Tobin Donertion Clain eyd to ;tery,_ :,. w Tobin n; dd recdd in vol 38 of dds p all raoolds of s4 ; . ; tr• ` • K C, 3 pt being 1077.12 ft W. and 1136 .32 ft I of -Us SW oor. of ' j 1x :15 of the Town of Renton, run th a1 sd. ft; r,'^ r 300 ft; th par wi th`ed y •line H 40' ft; th ft pt of ber, -.ivppting snd r4wirving Warn, the H 25 f r 7 , j»J & C.. COT : (Yrt?re in fte; Foca rt to uall and ry; quiet s p >.. . ro- . f f 1, and C W. es a ig seal lck !sr* flu: 22-49 1r4, JJ a *1d. bit (3ldney .T Williams, np f • rim at Renton. OM) . (7ld v t res of Rp Henry fla s Burke, Bl• • .) • • is C .. .. t _ . J J Yin _ . :_?r. , 1_r: . .._,i .ti. . 7. , �, :.3 :-_ , tZ, the ... it, ,f (.:It ‘r. . t!-F." CC : 27,_ 4.515 �'t r? r tt: f <.:1 :i i x 1 : 44. JJ ft went of V-e C..r. :: socn 17 In : ,3 u;..i t::: _rc., "..'. n r e 4: 71 e� tEl „,:. t: a r.ir' czr ;.t- --:::. rs.. .xt;'. i i t7 1' t`Irt ...rre:ttDn; N.0 r•.ir. th• soJ0 -ing 13" at;st 64.56 ft tr t':,• no mar gl Line of tre _ Seett..t' :ert :n „nd otithern ?:; r,/.)f any; th no 71deg 58'.:3 . '= treat tJ. .d ::arg1 lint.-95.86 rt to thePC of a e lrva to the 1�ft; t`: fol :.Or E, 1 carve i:•E th a red u3 of 624.69 ft thru 8 sweep of 17 deo; 52,' 0_" 1"_.12, ft to tb . . ; th sa Si deg 31134" 1 a4.4J. ft To the eaat r�ef,nder line of '31sckiiver; to no 2 ' deb 4t',: 20'3V west al ad., .andar__11 64.05 ft; ,tb, so 89 deg 5,'.` 34"; $ J eq.08 1't to thei'4 4f r. uurVe t�1ar_ th4, tisphtt th follow ad earn. 3 Vlb--2 with h tl :'a :: lII of 6$4.69 ft th."u d sweep of 17 deg 53' Ot" $12.76 , ft t;: ;..h,:r';.c of oaarTe to the /tft; th :`allots ad carve tst h a ra.lbt .;f 4;; ..YrS ft thr4 a' :aweey •of i dog 46 ' 15" 141.64-ft to the ' . 4.; t.. so c9 �:est, ib' lh"` seat 87.GO ft to the pob 0 tt i.ao tit ;:::rtrt of land :y.:ng bnt •t a east hank of 31= ok .-r. : . "Met, t.:.e east meander .0 nt- of ad river and thenbove ass north esa:1 bU a rF.i i;.nos .axtainiied iiy tathe 'eant bank of Isb ek river i hoobcve ZI!S ;p to be u:.,.d f sr the LI.u1p of a endin , SeeanJ `y eve rat t t) titecit t7 1a.k.I is Jude Thorne k.S:'eldi :_: ualthars z11t9:) i tb e?ss 1.. -.1- :,.: t. .• E,.::; :;a.i.i', :.:espt 23 1925 by .'trin:: a--it: ers, r:ndt i:11aC :.r:.it:".c ra, bvI F 51 ik eocr, .-Ip fink ad co gin'• at rs erA) 20 1:131 • .:cw .a _ la2U by t;.dar sr.as, •ref ,:eas0T tilliacte, tip! :a an res r t . 7 n 1. r.:i . ,:.i 1 1.ii;1 _ '.): ., , :Ii;L.1a,., 6 tt7 r,). 8.) / r` .:if --rx �r wn 1.m .) wn n✓I c... fY f Q.I ♦1 to Y...4 1,-...N -.. . -.-�.�- __ __ - . ,�I.��7T 11,. 'jai 1 Li S c o 'I w k U tp2` 350 17,C0may., _�" = 11 0 $10.Ct) 44.-14 Rentoe Sehvel Dirttet /do. 403 kow a achaol diatr! et of the lat clean to Job P r and Prances Plege '( eye and warn to ap theft re eit kow ti ,.Y Tht prt oar fnry Pi.. 'Tobta Den&tio2 Claim No.. 37 dal* • -- -Tba w $ ft of the B 60 ft of a tr of land daf :_. Pea? 414.5 ft X if the SE dor of a two sale tr of land aired to David C. D ttob*11 by Chnfles Bembn am Ap23 26 00 and ear being 1077.12 ft W is U1136.52 ft N of the SW tor of bJbc 25 sot the, T t' n of 7enton, aced to plat throf r. id In vol 1 of plats Dg 135 rtoa of ad on; th H 300 ft th AS 145.20 ft th j i ft th W less tospo55b � h— • M 25 ft t rof reserved "f 'Poses sad TWW ad corp Liss ennead t3i t atr to be clad by its proper Mars • . and !tee, al to he hrt i t• arty e tsn Schott:, Dlatlist i t03 Zing Csuty, Sty of Washingto Dubaon, pros cp s2 3. 11. Jon. awry >taer %ar 27 50 bT George R. Dobson and H. B. Johnson pre and secy of aby sd asrp (af)bf thous. S. Dobson np for 'on res RAnton (os Feb 11) r.1 TovDcbson Rmtan, ant f1A moo • ro c ,. J li3 t ` J .1 also re, in vol 2528 Mpg 379 __ D Apr 17 50 4OO6Sd ,7 O4 • tick 11 cO .10 Renton School District Nun, 403, Zing County, St of An, a school dirt of the 1st class to John puss and Yranass ?limo ( al re-rsa of 4002996 vol 2930 Pft 357 to shoe :orp sl of Linton 3choo Dist No t,03 st2n2ik straa9) • -' .t M'4i';, 74 ` `lsa'"` �.�„��/i ;'Q P-. ' ;iti l-P.S rgr: ' L,10 ) :i' �Iy .- ' :., 5:4'_, . P7-17:'.} .^I • 'T ; �,-.y,,,*q '.. �. y� ' .twk 4 C`Jyi�Y `t•,'ik+-r:: ''ii +_ i a eiitw� •• ;•572 '•.i '.'if.r ^.r'..:;.0. .iti ,j, .�f 7c Gi 'pi- '{ •..t � :'.trt ` ,: L..h .�, ^:..,tL�-..u .,.p}r L''.;;;f '"• dYif: ,- ��t.•• ,r.�e yyf_ 3f G•1 y' , ;. .,, .! #�r-..,.4t:s i' gift ig ..4 itj:.!l.v.m. J +-r etinn .rr Ii ,;yr...,1,•sAt!` .;. �r.44tA a ;i,J,•�A _0, . ,, r .f ,Itli 1 4 .t. , ht,r,t)t: .:o;;....)1 L'Aati . .. t. :,,r:; ✓ , &;.:I: . ,,; . , Al- iJ 'it!•?L'4'f .rrs3b1'1? ad:: L'-.t'!I. 1.:1': .'dui'' LiW .. :! Tit ptr' at th3 1.t. C.M..I`.:.iit:l1 two acre tt :.n Henry :I. TL': i Don Claim No 37 d r; Beir, at a iaurl at the ir.teratn or Logan at anti T u'r. Ave in the C or Renton, Wanh (ad coon beine on the oent •r line . of Tooin Ave) th run W on ad center line or Tob_n ? ;e ;raC' r.• th a 30 rt tc, the S line of Tobin Ave, tb W 60 rt to ttii. tpab, th S 1:117 ' W 122. 5 2 2x37►x ft, th W 40 ft, th i; ,e pit the 3� : irto thor 122. 5 ft to the S line of To+i�in .. .; Avei th is 2'l S 11n.' or Tobin Ave 14o rt to the tpnb `--s: l'h..a deed u made to d iacl.a i.m ti of gt .r,. if aby, to t nl i..:t. or the above fie: prop cyed to Gtt oz�'e :abre a rid L a. ..i..rie :'•ar'?'t' t' .h ...i re:: urJet` a l.ki r tl iii =._•7,.1 . ... k76':. Wf:ti i lr.,v .. :left _.1• . ' e a . .ie ( : p 'C• .,_tied `vim .:ent� : :t,u:.,i al31, ,:c• itu-,g by dee') rc undor and r:.ie No Z 13 �N - . y La ! rr r, ?? .. r r :.. X�.:, (:r. �; _�, � . fc;. L ?3a;1 + i 'r;:; and , ,.ec (names a�: t a .. ) =• j _ 1-1 'Si --- 1 0`� ' �,�,. ,t �. �'•..V'�;1 �'' . s•• �1: 4.l[ .i �` 'i•: :" � �, I...�R. t. . ,.a;a .� ." .. �:y, `fir {,.,;f�►ti• :;.ter• .. ��� , ; +%% • % � •� t " '_.��s..� w.a( ;,±•.,,"eai�:•.'; `,: t) Jul 23-5 ,.i �•:. Jul 14-55 ;1 , 0G cry tamp no tax . Renton School L"latirlcL No. 403 KCW - to George Jabre and PeaL +ne Pubre hw rareaerd at 3356 148 4+59664.) to show corporate . seal 1E,tt out by tap • fit ^ ^ - _z - --.. - — ..- . ---- --- —^_._._ - -3 A. .G rant-ofit,,2os snt •- ` ' ". . • Pi Jun S'.2-82 9-14 7 628000 • ,- Rey 2.305:2 / ,-�k , < ] avr nsi f Prank B.,r,ej acre rt i rnd itery D..l aur�rd i. •ha, ?ranci ~``:-.:. `� ;J ,, and Gabri•01 .Del aur.r I iiY of ner on • .� " .t O Th41:›tl , - <ui. a arms carp of 3d el a 2 �. gor. -' _ pp-in »t .21% nd the 1nII al at ioilt`of 'a. Y" for the us* . .., • 4 of the`•.rp Wy the -al.•do hby grant .end ay .ihw sir and to r4_ .-1 ':7 ,, •: its s: and a the rt t o go upon and coast el-sill saint al n a- `. -. i'• .- }1'.' > ;,, trunk .'tower_ running from the 2� si4e t t.h4 ; 8 side of the ` -. t- " pro' himaft.wr•.des t 0-wit .* • ',1 1. 'a 4� '.-. ' ft:4.a f'the s'a e•or of a tao'a tt •sold ••by('1,Char1� - , CO*an Z i,5: f1 , r ' - g: :Bruhn Vs :a y0e. on.MJ 19Dt3-•.4ad<=aror- EeinR <1. 7rQ.2 •!'t A• 1 • , -$ p•-• . `or and .113d.52,_.ft .1 of to.:•sir,eor of, Elk'-25 in the own of i. x ?',•�• v Rent onn1- tti-1 273 ft , -th.3 -145.20 ft, tf -•8 275 ft,- th wc146.20 ft ' ; to tho 1.1 of b.c and t)t rt at all resaltl. tines tci + cZupao the ' -4. ;,-• ei tt dr 1d tO •oak• a)] need4 repairs*rand the spc-44krales to do •..:- i..-* ` -:r as little damaiCagbto the growing crops as ;doetibl +�4`• • I } :" The 1 tM hby amrase t o put a "Y• in-the yelper at A�pt` riwar.st t a }} • r the rite of the .fp nitht eti rve thfor - - `' • ?rank 8•Del rur•nt i a41r , , Frsa es s Del sun 4+rs I T. _ 0a�rriw2 Del rurent i - ; -'_ : :;:.;s - begs Ma,I 23-22 by Frank 8.Del cur ant i--.and Francis :gel sur*r�t-i, and �_j G ab ri el Di)aurent i. bet' L o; Davis q, for we r e s at ors : : Rase o • ` ::` s ass May 24-26 (NI City of itent on, )tart on, l'ash) :`<7 a'",: y_ Y - 001 tO _i ? `'`:�0 • ^ am (i * 11 ' EASEMENT i 11 I .ilt THIS INSTRVENT, made this 2139ay of Jdruazi 1St_a_; CO CV by and between _ and O FtmtJn Scdool District No. ta: and C% and { and INP hereinafter called "Grantor(s)", and the CITY OF RENTC , a Municipal Corporation of King County, Washington, hereinafter called 'Grantee". WITNESSETH: That said Grantor(s), for and in consideratit.,.. _` the sum of $1.00 (one i and no/le0ths dollars) paid by Grantee, and other valuable considers on, do esby these presents, grant, bar;;lln, sell , convey, and warrant unto the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, an easement for public utilities (including Ilia hater and sewer) with necessary appurtenances over, th►^'!,:h, across and upon the following described property in King County, Washington, more particularly described as follows: That portion of the H. H. Tobin Donation Claim No. 37, in Section 18, ='F`h . . Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., ring County. Washington, more particularly ;`' described as follows: BEGINNING at the intersection of the centerlines of S. Tobin Street and • ' '. Logan Avenue S., in the City of Renton, Washington; thence South 0°53' 30' West • • `,-. • along the centerline of said Logan Avenue S. =30,.00 feet; thence North 88° 13' 00" West parallel to said South Tobin Street 206.55 feet to the true point of beginning; — . thence continuing North °13'00' West 15.00 feet; thence South 0° 46' 45 i:sst V': '.'? + 166.72 feet; thence South 36° 51' 45" West 320.36 feet; thence South 53°08' 15" East 1y.y.•_1. 15.00 feet; thence North 36° 51' 45' East 325.25 feet; thence North 0' 46' 45" East ku ';' 44 1 171.34 iieet to tbs true point of beginning. —JO .•{ :: ;;,7; ". SRE Ek1IIBIT "A" r• .�; h- . :A, 1I' Togf:her with a tencorary construction easer;en t _escribed as %- ? r . •:': i�r�� dUrit'y r.:t, ..._ :r a.t Said fxsacrar^r construction easement Wall re�a and until such time as the utilities and appurtenances '-e.e o'en eccc;;;:._ ' .— w. +r .f� oparatian and maintenance by the Grantee bi:t rot `.'r ,•r# t if • '" I t Said heretofore renti^red grantee, its successors or assigns, shall r 1 �� nave the right, without prior notice or proceeding at law, at such times as `" nay be necessary to enter upon said above oesc;ibed property for the purpose C of constructing, maintaining, repairing, altering or reconstructing said C,J utility, or making any connections therewith, without incurring any legal icY4- obligations or liability therefore, provided, that :uch construction. main- ; firing, repairing, altering or reconstruction of such utility shall be accomplished in such a manner that the private improvements existing in the right rights)-of-way snail not be disturbed or damaged, or in the event they are disturbed or damaged, they will be replaced in as good a condition as they were imrediately before the property was entered upon by the Grantee. The Grantor shall fully use and enjoy the aforedescribed premises. including the right to retain the right to use the surface of said right-of-way if such use does not interfere with installation and sain.tenance of the utility line. however, the grantor shall not erect buildings or structures over, under or across the right-of-way during the existence of such utility. _ ''ihis easement, shall be a covenant running with the land and shall be bind- OeO� .en the Grantor, his successors. heirs and assigns. Grantors covenant that • .,t. t�i*• *y,1re the ful owners of the above properties and that they nave a good and .�.�- fknrtgfit execute 's agreement. S(Z..t.,1.1 n try az,;.;. an o r �.- era 9 9 t Shelby Hey, Sege•- and r- - ( and 1 and • STATE E OF W:SHINGTON ) SS MUNTY OF KING ) ^,; _ Do this 21st day of January , 197 .before are, the undersigned, a f4- .L `,:nary Public in and for the State d Washington, duly commissioned and sworn ;.. prrsoca11y appeared Roger I. Lewis and Shelby Bewley to era known to be the Preside<'.t and Secretary , respecti7aly, "_ -. c'_ Renton School District "1o. 403 the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to he the free and volurtary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and pereoes' therein mentioned, and on oath stated that they are authorised to execute the said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of maid eorperetion. - WITI S vn hand and official seal hereto affixed the day sad y�s*r in tnia certificate above written. 4-1 ''''- '�f". xc'� 1 notary nubile in an for ere Sta of .)^~ aashington, residing at Hearten: % �_ �f% E)'c'' a - i'..• '_ P!1',I r CC e F4 ft L - •� .: - u.-.._ta+.r...s.rr�r.Ai tea.�aa�.....<.wra .+s.sww ,Yvi4. r.w r 94111444.........-- .or .N----rrlm•- rTp5. 1. hT..• • t. 4 Y 1 71.0 20 i 0228 i • 41 dII'iyYlb-IV I ill ; . a ECiAY tafS y aelP ak/ a, merit[Jac 642•MLl/r • I ' i '?4.' ' .91/O 1 of 71+1t It fri lraew m JAnov CtA/0 ova Pi. /u.L c J)OV Iq Rx t1 bvi,*r,An2tng, (IIK.+r S4i 37 $ A4../ril/o COuvr>, nm,S/mnfra/ Anti M<rr6icAIttr ' ; �I W I O,t s C/i!O AS l• '..L : 0,4KM4' Ar me:I4/11f4Sia rx?�/Of 17,f C4WU t,4uf S ' 12y A t� d .a 1talav snttlr AMID AooA4I.I.44/cAI A,ill INCair Of 4.3:t/lat/RMtf4YIAfkki• 7 J ~� 3 rj n+rurr S o• •�')' AtaK nee CYih-1 lnvi or-S4 LaSM/ 4 NVI 4 do-AO fill; O .`t ^v ui + T„rI/CI ✓/1f41pO'N ^+uLClt t S✓O S 7t 1aI Tlllilr to $s ltlr lD Ti.1 ntAt b ( �:Z — g 1 40.,r a 066.xww; 11M[Mx CLKItMKA4.0 Al l.t'IDA7'N 44,32 0r4r; 1NINC4 J ov4 41V I L V i' I t4•.1T AiIr; iWAMcr S as$F 4i Siam'/ar; 704A/G/ .SJ P'$t /loo fslr • , p i »Ib,cf 11 Ai to Ay, Sti PS,I.tr rPrsMGL A/O'K•.ts f /)l 1V riff JM 114 WI 4 mai,'':7 4114,04414.4404. t . / I F_I1 t . • s GU ,�;� / I1R1!'.NIVI/mom.$CJ,ka01( • is Rio,a. 7U�Mwf di:S1.aur . . . ..... P' oArt*Il dos • Reduced Print r--, / E,N •if Mow Art J. 44.0ev,wa.raro00..1 mi. . +t .y1p1. JACK ELLER ASSOCIATES, Ir,c. Do Not Scale -- , ' () civt engineers land surveyart �.• I - ''" 1..a.Myr.M ... , . . Y.• •�.. ,y. . .Y:c... - '. -- ... ..... 1 ,fir r. { ., • L I ., ' "`••-•:?"'-',,,",',- • !:".1711T.'t*.;rf, •..,-4.. • •• ••—• ... - ••:'•"'",--'!' •'.. c1;,,,y.:..,::. ,f.a. •• ... :::, - , . • , ' . • , .... 1 ••.„ ,;•A•l'ael.kfil'•-‘. • '`5' •,1,,... ' . .. ....•• '.. .t •.4, :tl.t"'1,•'..• • .}'?' ,., , .,. ' ,' • 1..............,......4........awedilowlilpt•~1 Wotan;...............mcoma0 • • 1111IIIIMMI110•11.111.10•11i1INIMMUNVINIMMI11121~.111101L,IMIIMIN MS. . Ffil--1.-71 F o a 0 i 7 • 0228 UT— RI 4.0C • , 1 71()201 • , . I . . ,. • 1 . ••.; I . ... . I • - , . I . • Is ..'. • . . , I . I i , 1 •D••<",., A C.r-el • X PI • PI • !: C) •• (l C3 ; 0 ;., rn r.cn 5i —I ta 4 , , -...- • 0 1,) 1,s • riLft for Record at Amuest oi ..,,....:•:: Ut4I F"1"f".\-- ........_ - til •.m., •,•.:▪ CI .;..I .r.7 • V) 40 10 C rn 1/) •-I can ,I YI •L.,. .. ' rAtt • .1 1: 4.4616.171' ON M 'PAL BZNU I" . 2 • • I -illaitlatuA •.. . !,• 1 IsManom- ll" . . .•• •• - • • / • . •••s'...;. , . ..''..... ... • ',, ...).•*.••• •, r....,i, . .. . r•,- ..40..:,1 . .. '' ... '.7)-.... • . • '';‘144 .• Q004 . -s .! ,•!.1 4 V l 14!„. 4 to t .IS......lit,,rui .,%,,,,,,.‘.I,i...A,t, .1!: •4;••;, s*,:;.....1'.1:1'44VVf.`•,;:f...`11,,;',4I'A......‘ v• . ._. . - L'1 tV• .,• ' • ..s• ••" Ll ' T ••'''.get.'•,•,•••'''..-1 '• .••NTrit•.•••:t- ,.6',4;••,•!•,%:'..4",jW., /. 1.:.' ...;•1..4,e:3 I.Jp• \I ,--.; .-ia r, Ils •-.•• ,... .-.„ I',%'4.:,• '.1.• ,• . II.k:v '... .,...' .. .:•1.,..'...... '1, .•:•.;i•..• .:,; .!., • .. , • • , I , . , ,, ,.. , ,.1;., ,.., ..,. .1.,..„.• I . .. .• .....r.•? ...,, II.; 1..le te. J e• •••• • .‘ •• " ' lki'It,'s I.,...' ....: . •..1.0.• • ,:t',.''':-.'n.',',:-:.'•• :.•%''..: .., .• " ' .•' , . .';•:. . . •.... 4 :•,, •• .(„4 r•' , :.•;* .• ... ' Pet••••'4,•:,..,'•..1.•••• ( ••.',4'.%;•;•;•41.1"; . N'S•b.."'.! 6'..'•' ....f.-lao: .t.' r...,14:., •. . ...1. A • .•,. I. , t 1....... .... .. z • •. .i., i•0-1.:., , ..r.: r..f....,f -i?Ifyitcrii4 • UTILITIES II • EASEMENT THIS INSTRUMENT, made this 6thday of June 1985 by and between and RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 403 and City of Renton and and hereinafter called "Grantor(s)", and the CITY OF RENTON, a Municipal Corporation of King County, Washington, hereinafter called "Grantee". WITNESSETH: • That said Grantor(s) , for and in consideration of the sum of $ 1.00 paid by Grants.., and other valuable consideration, do by these presents, grant, bargain, sell , convey, and warrant unto the said Grantee, its p successors and assigns, an easement for public utilities (including water and sewer) with CD r,cessary appurtenances over, through, across and upon the following described property 0 in King County, Washington, more particularly described as follows: T CA A strip of land 20.0 feet wide 10.0 feet each side of the following described centerline F more particularly described as follows: 11t Beginning at the intersection of Shattuck Ave. S. and S. Tobin St.; thence West 5.0 feet along the centerline of S. Tobin St.; thence South 30.0 feet along a line parallel to 5.0 feet westerly of the southerly extention of the centerline of Shattuck Ave. So.; thence continuing southerly along said parallel line a distance of 875.0 feet more or less to the north margin of S. 2nd St. and the terminus of said centerline. 85/06/27 80560 8 RECO F _ 4.00 CASHSL ****4.00 55 m rn A zvm r m c,c ' rn < - co ro. - Z = o • FlDEO FOR RECORD AT REQUEST OF 10111111111711111 IVE St UEII-I kr, Said heretofore mentioned grantee, its successors or assigns, shall have the right, without prior notice or proceeding at law, at such times as may be necessary to enter upon said above described property for the purpose of :onstruct- ing, maintaining, repairing, altering or reconstructing said utilities, or making any connections therewith, without incurring any legal obligations or liability therefore, provided, that such construction, maintaining..repairing, titering or reconstruction of said utilities shall be accomplished in such a manner that the private improvements existing in the right(s)-of-way shall not to disturbed or damaged, they will be replaced in as good a condition as they were im'.diately before the property was entered upon by the Grantee. The Grantor shall fully use and enjoy thl,aforedescribed premises, including the right to retain the right to use the surface of said right-of-way if such use does not interfere with installation and maintenance of the utilities. However, the grantor shall not erect buildings or structures over, under cr across the right-of-way during the existence of such utilities. This easement. shall he a covenant running with the land and shall be binding on the Grantor, his successors, heirs and assigns. Grantors covenant that they are the 1 I. ful own s of e above properties and that they have a good and lawful right xecuted4I• a. ,- - a../, • ent. it 4% Ill and Superintenft and and and O GO u; O C4 2 CORPORATE FORM: c�� O un ciD Washington ) STATE OF ) SS . COUNTY OF King ) • On this Sixth day of June , 19 85_ before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington , duly commissioned and sworn personally appeared Gary F. Kohlwes and • to me known to be the Superintendent and respectively, of Renton School District 4C3. the corporation that executed the fore- going instrument. and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he is authorized to execute the said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year in this certificate above written. ` .51(4% i Lary 0.757 c in and for the S to of Washington , residing tRenton • ......... A _:. ► 1 1 l - 1 NI I$ V f E 2C39007 11 1. s./24s j SS V. V . iv N ,i1 s nl 91/O. C 0, 6. t- 1 'O,a W N I'32'45'E 9'r/ AVE —}— ,30.01 ,f N I Y -OOAT�50.36'W 101.36vo I t a A E.Vs- ' I iOS.02 — W 16.90 RtMC - O yIR 103.86 50.68 En m • o of - 50.0 c" -- O C fit � N • Z 75.10 -• -_ I E.noun 11 a) I or. �wy�ni:n;O .A 01 I ('_ 11 n , 10 9 aW AJ es. fir. to in o t= 0IO I CO 00 CO m ,nm „mm Nm p„o , Ea.porop. "' I `;""".,,,w' N 1— — —i- • 50 00 N I'32 45.E 50.00 f• • — — ♦D �, ,IL Ed.f 6• lonco SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE. THIS MAP CORRECTLY REPRESENTS A SURVEY MADE BY ME • OR UNDER MY DIRECTION IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS RECORDING CERTIFICATE OF THE SURVEY RECORDING ACT AT THE REQUEST OF RUDY SEI/4 NE I/4 SEC 18 TWP.23N.,R.SE.,W.M. STARKO✓ICH IN NOV. 986 KENNETH J.OYLER C.E. aL.S. 255-5050 FILED FOR RECORD THIS__-_DAY OF A.D.1987,AT-__M.,IN '. P.O.BOX 2258 RENTON WA. 98056 BOOK.__OF SURVEYS ON PAGE____AT THE REQUEST OF •w'" f)'`,l SURVEY LOTS 9 8l 10 KENNETH J.OYLER.L.S. �� 14,� � c _ cs� _ MOTOR UNE ADDITION MANAGER SUPT.OF RECORDS "' CE TIFICATE No 5 24 RENTON WA. 4w�� EXPIRATION DATE 3-8-87 SCALE I"•20• °'A's""" 86018 • Y :it 1 PERKINS COIE LLP 1201 THIRD AVENUE, SUITE 4800•SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98 1 0 1-3099 TELEPHONE: 206 583-8888• FACSIMILE: 206 583-8500 WAYT T.WATTERSON 206-287-3483 wattw@perkinscoie.com February 9, 2000 Marilyn J. Petersen, City Clerk City of Renton CITY OF RENTON Renton City Hall FEB 1 0 2000 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 RECEIVED CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Re: Renton School District Appeal of Hearing Examiner's Decision Dated 11/18/99 on Variances for Renton High School Modernization Dear Ms. Petersen: Enclosed is the Renton School District's Memorandum in Support of Appeal From the Hearing Examiner's Decision, in the matter of the application for Site Plan and Variance approval for the Renton High School modernization project, File No. LUA-99-120, SA-H, V-H. An original and three copies of this Memorandum are enclosed. The original is for inclusion in the official file. Please transmit the three copies to the members of the City Council Planning and Development Committee: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Tim Schlitzer, and Bob Edwards. Please advise me when these copies have been delivered to the Committee members. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, Wayt T. Watterson Enclosures 61 4scx- Of IUC)`' d,), kr)-\(11)k-ltC2- WTW:aw [32012-0806/SB003679.875] ANCHORAGE BELLEVUE BOISE DENVER HONG KONG LOS ANGELES MENLO PARK OLYMPIA PORTLAND SAN FRANCISCO SEATTLE SPOKANE TAIPEI WASHINGTON, D.C. STRATEGIC ALLIANCE: RUSSELL&DuMOULIN, VANCOUVER, CANADA } 11 - l10 `) • t k• 1 • SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION AND PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT PROPOSED RENTON HIGH SCHOOL RENOVATIONS AND ADDITION RENTON, WASHINGTON ��,oc pk ,�0�9 PREPARED FOR of c* V4 ev Renton School District No. 403 PROJECT NO. KE99087G APRIL 1999 CORPORATE OFFICE 911 Fifth Avenue,Suite 100 Kirkland,Washington 98033 ASSOCIATED (425) 827-7701 EARTH FAX (425) 827-5424 SCIENCES, INC BAINBRIDGE ISLAND OFFICE 179 Madrone Lane North Bainbridge Island,WA 98110 (206)780-9370 FAX(206)780-9438 SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION, GEOLOGIC HAZARD, AND PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT PROPOSED RENTON HIGH SCHOOL RENOVATIONS AND ADDITION 400 SOUTH SECOND STREET RENTON, WASHINGTON April 19, 1999 Project No. KE99087G I. PROJECT AND SITE CONDITIONS 1.0 INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of our subsurface exploration'and geologic hazard/geotechnical engineering study for the proposed renovations and addition to Renton High School. Our recommendations are preliminary, in that the final scope of the renovation project has not been determined. The final scope of work will be based, in part, on the assessment of existing pile foundation systems that is contained in this report. The existing site layout and the area of the currently proposed theater addition are presented on the Site and Exploration Plan, Figure 1. We recommend that we be allowed to review the contents of this report once the scope of the renovation has been finalized, in order to confirm or modify the geotechnical recommendations contained in this report to reflect the final design. 1.1 Purpose and Scope The purpose of this study was to provide subsurface data to be utilized in the preliminary design and development of the above-mentioned project. Our study included reviewing available literature, excavating exploration pits to expose and allow inspection of selected existing foundation piles, drilling test borings in the area of the proposed new addition, and performing geologic studies to assess the type, thickness, distribution, and physical properties of the subsurface sediments and shallow ground water conditions. Geologic hazard evaluations and engineering studies were also conducted to determine suitable geologic hazard mitigation techniques, the type of suitable foundation, allowable bearing pressures, anticipated settlements, floor support recommendations and drainage considerations. This report summarizes our current field work and offers hazard mitigation and development recommendations based on our present understanding of the project. 1.2 Authorization Authorization to proceed with this study was granted by Mr. Jack Connell of the Renton School District, by means of Renton School District Purchase Order No. 94301. Our study was accomplished in general accordance with our scope of work letter dated February 22, 1999. This 1 report has been prepared for the exclusive use of the Renton School District and their agents, for specific application to this project._Within the limitations of scope, schedule, and budget, our services have been performed in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering and engineering geology practices in effect in this area at the time our report was prepared. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. 2.0 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION This report was completed with an understanding of the project based on preliminary site layout and design drawings/sketches referenced as Advance Planning and Research for Architecture I, Pages 1-3 (undated), provided by the District for our use. Present plans call for construction of a new theater, measuring approximately 75 feet by 75 feet, attached to the east end of the existing Aa, building. The existing Ae building would be demolished in its entirety to accommodate the new theater. The existing boiler house building will also be demolished. The remainder of the buildings on-site will be renovated by demolishing the interior, providing structural upgrades,and constructing new interior improvements. An existing covered parking area north of the A, building may also be enclosed to form new interior space. The plan for interior upgrades is contingent upon confirmation that the existing piles beneath the affected buildings are in serviceable condition, as well as upon estimates of the approximate vertical and horizontal load bearing capacities that may be assumed for existing piles. Assessment of the feasibility of using existing piles to support newly renovated buildings is contingent upon both geotechnical and structural design factors. Our geotechnical assessment of existing foundation piles at selected locations beneath the A. and AW buildings is included in this report. Future investigation of the piles supporting the gymnasium may also be provided. If existing pile foundations are found to be unsuitable to allow renovation of the existing buildings to current building and seismic codes, more comprehensive reconstruction may be planned. The property was situated in the 400 block of South Second Street in Renton, Washington. The site was occupied by an existing high school with associated parking, driveways, sidewalks, athletic facilities, and other improvements. The site is relatively flat, with overall estimated vertical relief of less than 5 feet. The existing school is made up of six buildings and a boiler house. The various buildings have a complex history of construction and renovation that has been researched in detail by Chalker, Putnam, Collins, and Scott, the consulting structural engineer, and was summarized in their report, dated April 9, 1999. Briefly, it is understood that each of the buildings is supported by a pile foundation system. We understand that no records depicting the details of the type of pile (wood, steel, concrete), diameter/thickness of piles, or lengths of piles were found for the A.and A,,, buildings. 3.0 SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION Our field study included excavating four exploration pits to expose existing foundation piles at selected locations around the perimeter of the Ate,and An buildings, and drilling four exploration 2 borings at the location of the proposed new theater. Our observations on the condition and approximate capacities of selected foundation piles are included in a later section of this report. The various types of sediments encountered in the exploration borings, as well as the depths where characteristics of the sediments changed, are indicated on the exploration logs presented in the Appendix. The depths indicated on the logs where conditions changed may represent gradational variations between sediment types in the field. If changes occurred between sample intervals in our borings, they were interpreted. The locations of our field explorations were determined by approximate measurement from the known site features shown on a site plan provided by the District for our use. We did not have a recent topographic survey for the site at the time of our field work. The conclusions and recommendations presented in this report are based on the exploration pits and exploration borings completed for this study. The number, location, and depth of the explorations were completed within site and budgetary constraints. Because of the nature of exploratory work below ground, extrapolation of subsurface conditions between field explorations is necessary. It should be noted that differing subsurface conditions may sometimes be present due to the random nature of deposition and the alteration of topography by past grading and/or filling. The nature and extent of any variations between the field explorations may not become fully evident until construction. If variations are observed at that time, it may be necessary to re- evaluate specific recommendations in this report and make appropriate changes. 3.1 Exploration Pits Exploration pits were excavated with a tractor-mounted backhoe. The pits were excavated to allow direct observation of existing piles beneath the Aw and A„ buildings at selected locations. The pits allowed direct measurement of pile butt diameters, and soundness testing of the tops of timber piles. Photographs of the exposed piles are appended with this report. 3.2 Exploration Borings The exploration borings were completed by advancing a 4'A-inch inside-diameter, hollow-stem auger with a track-mounted drill rig. During the drilling process, samples were obtained at generally 2- or 5-foot depth intervals. The borings were continuously observed and logged by an engineering geologist from our firm. The exploration logs presented in the Appendix are based on the field logs, drilling action, and inspection of the samples secured. Disturbed but representative samples were obtained by using the Standard Penetration Test procedure in accordance with ASTM:D 1586. This test and sampling method consists of driving a standard 2-inch outside-diameter, split-barrel sampler a distance of 18 inches into the soil, with a 140-pound hammer free-falling a distance of 30 inches. The number of blows for each 6-inch interval is recorded, and the number of blows required to drive the sampler the final 12 inches is known as the Standard Penetration Resistance ("N") or blow count. If a total of 50 is recorded within one 6-inch interval, the blow count is recorded as 50 blows for the number of inches of penetration. The resistance, or N-value, provides a measure of the relative density of granular 3 • soils or the relative consistency of cohesive soils; these values are plotted on the attached boring logs. The samples obtained from the split barrel sampler were classified in the field, and representative portions were placed in water-tight containers. The samples were then transported to our laboratory for further visual classification and laboratory testing, as necessary. 4.0 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Subsurface conditions at the project site were inferred from the field explorations accomplished for this study, visual reconnaissance of the site, and review of topography provided in both published geologic literature for the site and vicinity, and in a topographic survey completed approximately 35 years ago. As shown on the field logs, the exploration holes generally encountered fill materials overlying natural deposits of recent alluvium. The following section presents more detailed subsurface information organized from the upper (youngest) to the lower (oldest) sediment types. 4.1 Stratigraphy Fill Fill soils (those not naturally placed)were encountered in each of the borings and exploration pits. The fill ranged in thickness from 3 feet in all four exploration borings, to greater than 81 feet in the exploration pits . As noted on the exploration logs, the fill consisted of loose, moist,brown, silty, fine to medium sand with trace organics and minor amounts of rubble and debris. These materials appear to vary in both quality and depth across the site. Since the quality,thickness, and compaction of the fill materials is low and variable, the fill is unsuitable for structural support. Recent Alluvium Natural soils beneath the fill materials generally consisted of very loose to loose, moist to saturated, mottled brown, mottled gray and gray, silty fine sand with trace gravel, although some very soft to soft silt layers were also encountered. This material is interpreted to represent recent alluvium(river-deposited sediments), which is consistent with the geologic setting of the site near the Cedar River, and near the former location of the Black River, which was previously located on the west edge of the site. The Black River channel on the site was diverted and filled to form the existing athletic fields west of the school. Gravel content of the alluvial soils generally increased with depth; however, the depth at which more gravelly alluvium was encountered varied significantly at different exploration locations on the site. With increasing gravel content the materials generally become more dense, and will, in our opinion, provide suitable support for properly designed foundation piles. The upper, loose and occasionally organic alluvial deposits should not be utilized for foundation support. 4 4.2 Hydrology Ground water seepage was encountered in all of our exploration borings, and one-of our exploration pits at the time of our field study. The depth:of seepage ranged from 4 feet to 131 feet, and probably indicated both shallow perched ground water occurrences and more extensive aquifer conditions beneath the site. Variations in ground water levels should be expected in response to changes in on- and off-site land usage, season, precipitation, irrigation, and other factors. 4.3 Existing Pile Observations . We observed existing foundation piles beneath the A„and AN,buildings at selected locations. The locations were chosen based on access, utilities, and other constraints, to provide a general assessment of the type and condition of piles beneath these buildings. It should be noted that we observed only two piles beneath each building, and that all of our observations were made at the building perimeters. Variations in foundation construction techniques may be present between our exploration locations, or in portions of the buildings that were not accessible for exploration. The conclusions contained in this report were based on the data that was available to us, from the construction history produced by Chalker, Putnam, Collins, and Scott, and from our on-site observations. If any discrepancies are noted between future observed conditions and those assumed for the purpose of preparing this report, we should be allowed to review the new information, and either confirm or modify the recommendations presented in this report. Building A„ Exploration pits EP-1 and EP-4, located on the west side of building A„, each exposed one treated timber pile beneath a perimeter foundation element. The general configuration of the foundation system included a foundation wall, with a relatively wider grade beam at the base, supported by foundation piles connected to the bottom of the grade beams. Each of the piles was photographed, and selected photographs from our reconnaissance are included in the Appendix. Measurement of the pile diameters with a hand-held tape measure indicated pile butt diameters immediately beneath the grade beam connection of approximately 12 to 13 inches. We also used an increment borer to core a 0.2-inch-diameter sample of each wood pile. The cores indicated that the distance from edge to center of the piles was 6 to 614 inches, and that the depth of penetration of creosote treatments varied from approximately 0.3 to 0.7 inch. In general, the wood cores recovered from the piles appeared firm, sound, and free from visible weakness. Based on conventional estimates of taper of douglas fir timber piles, namely tapering by 1 inch in diameter in a length of 10 feet, and assuming a tip diameter of 9 inches, we anticipate that the piles we observed beneath the A„ building are on the order of 25 to 30 feet in length below the grade beams. 5 Building Ate, Exploration pits EP-2 and EP-3, located on the west and south sides of building Aw, respectively, each exposed one precast concrete pile with an octagonal cross section. The piles were located beneath a grade beam in the case of EP-2, and beneath a pile cap in the case of EP-3. The piles generally appeared symmetrical; however, it was typically only possible to measure the diameter in the orientation parallel to the edge of the grade beam or pile cap. Each of the exposed piles measured approximately 13 inches from face to face (of the octagonal cross section) in the direction parallel to the pile cap or grade beam. We have no way to determine the length of the concrete piles; however, for the purpose of preparing the pile capacity estimates,we have assumed a concrete pile length of 30 feet. 6 April 19, 1999 Project No. KE99087G II. GEOLOGIC HAZARDS AND MITIGATIONS The following discussion of potential geologic hazards is based on the geologic and ground water conditions as observed and discussed herein. The discussion will be limited to seismic hazards. 5.0 SEISMIC HAZARDS AND RECOMMENDED MITIGATION Earthquakes occur in the Puget Lowland with great regularity. Fortunately, the vast majority of these events are small and are usually not felt by man. However, large earthquakes do occur as evidenced by the 1949, 7.2 magnitude event and the 1965, 6.5 magnitude event. The 1949 earthquake appears to have been the largest in this area during recorded history. Evaluation of earthquake return rates indicates that an earthquake of a magnitude between 5.5 and 6.0 will likely occur within the next 8 to 12 years. For this site, we have considered two types of potential geologic hazards associated with large seismic events: 1) surficial ground rupture, and, 2) liquefaction. The potential for each of these hazards to adversely impact the proposed project is discussed below. 5.1 Surficial Ground Rupture Generally, the largest earthquakes which have occurred in the Seattle area are sub-crustal events with epicenters ranging from 50 to 70 kilometers in depth. For this reason, no surficial faulting or earth rupture as a result of deep, seismic activity has been documented to date in this portion of King County. Therefore, it is our opinion, based on existing geologic data, that the risk of surface rupture as a direct result of tectonic motion impacting the proposed project is low. Surface rupture can also be caused by substantial liquefaction settlement. Liquefaction is discussed below. 5.2 Liquefaction The shallow, loose, sandy sediments below the site are considered to have moderate to high risk of liquefaction during a seismic event of the magnitude that could be expected for the Seattle area. The deeper gravelly alluvial sediments, which will support pile foundations that are installed in accordance with this report, and which probably support existing foundation piles, are considered at low risk of liquefaction due to their relatively high density and coarse grain size. Therefore, we did not complete a site specific liquefaction analysis, since the existing and planned buildings are or will be supported by foundation elements that do not derive their support from soils that are anticipated to have a significant risk of liquefaction. 7 In addition, considering the thickness of liquefaction-prone sediments, the vertical distribution of sediment types, and estimated consolidation under seismic conditions, ground surface rupture as a consequence of liquefaction appears to be unlikely, in our opinion. However, a definitive analysis of the potential of ground surface rupture as a result of liquefaction was not completed for this study. 5.3 Seismic Design Factors The following seismic design factors are based on the subsurface conditions observed during our exploration program, and on the 1997 Uniform Building Code, Chapter 16. The site is located in Seismic Zone 3, with a soil profile type SE. This corresponds to a Seismic Zone Factor (Z) of 0.3, a Seismic Coefficient (Ca) of 0.36, and a Seismic Coefficient (Cv) of 0.84. 8 April 19, 1999 Project No. KE99087G III. DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS 6.0 INTRODUCTION Based on the information gathered during our site investigation, we have developed approximate load bearing capacity values for existing timber and concrete piles at two selected locations below the An and Aw buildings, respectively. This data, together with the studies performed by others, should provide the structural engineer with sufficient information to evaluate the feasibility of upgrading the existing buildings using the existing foundations. Subsurface conditions observed in our explorations confirm that the site is underlain at shallow depth by fill soils and native sediments that are loose and variable, and would not provide adequate support for conventional shallow foundations. The following report sections provide recommendations for new pile foundations for the proposed theater building, and for the "infill" area north of the Aw building. 7.0 EXISTING PILE FOUNDATION CAPACITIES Based on our observations of the butts of four piles, as described above, and on subsurface conditions observed in our explorations, we have developed the following table that presents the approximate pile capacities for the An and A,,, buildings' existing piles. It should be noted that these estimates were based on limited information and on assumptions of pile lengths, diameters of piles we did not observe, and other values. The assumptions were based on the best information available to us when this report was written. Changes in the assumptions made to develop the pile capacity estimates would result in changes to the resulting estimated capacities. Estimated Existing Pile Load Capacities Building Allowable Vertical Ultimate Vertical Lateral (Tons)3 Compressive (Tons) Uplift (Tons) An (Timber Piles)1 20 4 1.75 Aw, (Precast Concrete Piles)2 40 12 3 Notes: 1. Assumes a pile length of 25 feet, pile diameter of 12 inches at butt and 9 inches at tip. Assumes 5 feet penetration into bearing layer with N=21. 2. Assumes a pile length of 30 feet,pile diameter of 13 inches, and assumes 10 feet penetration into a bearing layer with N=21. 3. Assumes fixed head condition and 'r_inch of allowable deflection. Seismic factors as presented in Section 5.3 should be applied to pile foundation designs. 9 8.0 SITE PREPARATION • We understand that the new theater is to be constructed in the location of the existing Aebuilding. The Ae building and associated buried utilities, along with any other structures in the area of the new building, should be removed from the footprints of the new theater and infill area. Any demolition waste that is left in the new construction area may cause difficult or impossible pile installation conditions, resulting in costly delays and modifications to foundation plans at the time of construction. Any depressions or low areas that result from demolition should be backfilled with structural fill as discussed under the Structural Fill section of this report. In our opinion, stable construction slopes should be the responsibility of the contractor,and should be determined during construction. For estimating purposes, however, we anticipate that temporary, unsupported cut slopes in the loose fill and alluvium can be made at a maximum slope of 1.5H:1V to 2H:1V (Horizontal:Vertical), depending on ground water conditions, surcharges, and other factors. As is typical with earthwork operations, some sloughing and raveling may occur and cut slopes may have to be adjusted in the field. In addition, WISHA/OSHA regulations should be followed at all times. The on-site soils contain a high percentage of fine-grained material that makes them moisture- sensitive and subject to disturbance when wet. The contractor must use care during site preparation and excavation operations so that the underlying soils are not softened. If disturbance occurs, the softened soils should be removed, and the area should be brought to grade with structural fill. Consideration should be given to protecting access and staging areas with an appropriate section of crushed rock or Asphalt Treated Base (ATB). If crushed rock is considered for the access and staging areas, it should be underlain by engineering stabilization fabric, such as Mirafi 500X or equivalent, to reduce the potential of fine-grained materials pumping up through the rock and turning the area to mud. The fabric will also aid in supporting construction equipment, thus reducing the amount of crushed rock required. We recommend that at least 10 inches of rock be placed over the fabric; however, due to the variable nature of the near-surface soils and differences in wheel loads, this thickness may have to be adjusted by the contractor in the field. If the existing asphalt paving on-site is to be used for construction access, damage to the surface from traffic loads that exceed the pavement design values should be expected. We anticipate that most or all of the pavement area on-site that is used for hauling demolition waste, construction materials, and fill or export soils, will require renovation. Depending on the extent and nature of the damage, renovation may consist of laying a sealant or stabilization fabric and a pavement overlay. Badly damaged areas may require reconstruction from the subgrade up. 9.0 STRUCTURAL FILL There is a possibility that structural fill will be necessary to establish desired grades. All references to structural fill in this report refer to subgrade preparation, fill type, placement, and compaction of materials as discussed in this section. If a percentage of compaction is specified under another section of this report, the value given in that section should be used. 10 After overexcavation/stripping has been performed to the satisfaction of the geotechnical engineer/engineering geologist, the upper 12 inches of exposed ground in building and sidewalk areas should be recompacted to a minimum of 90 percent of the modified Proctor maximum density, using ASTM:D 1557 as the standard. Pavement subgrades should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the same standard for all materials shallower than 2 feet below finished grades. If the subgrade contains too much moisture, adequate recompaction may be difficult or impossible to obtain and should probably not be attempted. In lieu of recompaction, the area to receive fill should be overexcavated if necessary, then blanketed with washed rock or quarry spalls to act as a capillary break between the new fill and the wet subgrade. Where the exposed ground remains soft and further overexcavation is impractical,placement of an engineering stabilization fabric may be necessary to prevent contamination of the free-draining layer by silt migration from below. After recompaction of the exposed ground is tested and approved or a free-draining rock course is laid, structural fill may be placed to attain desired grades. Structural fill is defined as non- organic soil, acceptable to the geotechnical engineer, placed in maximum 8-inch loose lifts, with each lift being compacted to 95 percent of the modified Proctor maximum density using ASTM:D 1557 as the standard. In the case of roadway and utility trench filling, the backfill should be placed and compacted in accordance with current local or county codes and standards. The top of the compacted fill should extend horizontally outward a minimum distance of 3 feet beyond the location of structures or roadway edges before sloping down at an angle of 2H:1V. The contractor should note that any proposed fill soils must be evaluated by Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. (AESI) prior to their use in fills. This would require that we have a sample of the material 48 hours in advance to perform a Proctor test and determine its field compaction standard. Soils in which the amount of fine-grained material (smaller than No. 200 sieve) is greater than approximately 5 percent(measured on the minus No. 4 sieve size) should be considered moisture- sensitive. Use of moisture-sensitive soil in structural fills should be limited to favorable dry weather conditions. The on-site soils generally contained significant amounts of silt and are considered moisture-sensitive. In addition, construction equipment traversing the site when the soils are wet can cause considerable disturbance. If fill is placed during wet weather or if proper compaction cannot be obtained,a select import material consisting of a clean, free-draining gravel and/or sand should be used. Free-draining fill consists of non-organic soil with the amount of fine-grained material limited to 5 percent by weight when measured on the minus No. 4 sieve fraction. A representative from our firm should inspect the stripped subgrade and be present during placement of structural fill to observe the work and perform a representative number of in-place density tests. In this way, the adequacy of the earthwork may be evaluated as filling progresses and any problem areas may be corrected at that time. It is important to understand that taking random compaction tests on a part-time basis will not assure uniformity or acceptable performance of a fill. As such, we are available to aid the owner in developing a suitable monitoring and testing program. 11 L . 10.0 FOUNDATIONS Due to risks of greater than normal settlement, deep foundation construction is recommended for support of the new theater building and infill area. Shallow foundations are only recommended for small, lightly loaded ancillary retaining walls less than 3 feet tall, such as landscaping walls, stairs, and ramps. 10.1 Shallow Footings Spread footings may be used for support of lightly loaded ancillary structures such as stairs and short retaining walls less than approximately 3 feet in height. Building foundations, and other settlement sensitive structures should be pile supported. Shallow foundations should be supported by a layer of compacted structural fill at least 2 feet thick, and which extends at least 2 feet horizontally beyond the edges of all sides of the foundation elements. If subgrade conditions are wet, soft, or very silty, a geotextile fabric, such as Mirafi 500X or equivalent, should be used to segregate the new fill from the silty subgrade. The new fill material that is to support lightly loaded shallow foundations should be compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of the modified Proctor maximum dry density. With subgrades prepared as recommended, allowable foundation bearing pressures of 1,000 psf should be used. It should be noted that the area bound by lines extending downward and away from any footing at 1H:1V must not intersect another footing or intersect a filled area that has not been compacted to at least 90 percent of ASTM:D 1557. In addition, a 1.5H:1V line extending downward and away from any footing must not daylight,because sloughing or raveling may eventually undermine the footing. Thus, footings should not be placed near the edge of steps or cuts in the bearing soils. Anticipated total settlement of lightly loaded footings founded on approved structural fill should be on the order of 1 inch, and differential settlement may approach the total settlement. However, disturbed soil not removed from footing excavations prior to footing placement could result in increased settlements. All footing areas should be inspected by AESI prior to placing concrete to verify that the design bearing capacity of the soils has been attained and that construction conforms with the recommendations contained in this report. Such inspections may be required by the governing municipality. Perimeter footing drains should be provided as discussed under the section on drainage considerations in this report. 10.2 Augercast Piles Cast-in-place concrete piles (Augercast) may be used for support of the new theater. Augercast piles should also be used to support new walls used to create the infill north of the Aw building. Piles for the infill area will require the use of specialized low-overhead installation equipment. We recommend that the placement of all piles be accomplished by a contractor experienced in their installation. Soils of alluvial origin may have gravel lenses, boulders, or logs present in them. Similar obstacles could be encountered in fill soils. It may be necessary to have a backhoe present during pile installation to dig out obstacles and backfill the excavation prior to drilling piling. 12 • Because of the variable nature of the subsurface soils, it is inappropriate to give exact pile lengths. However, we estimate pile lengths to be on the order of 25 to 35 feet. Final pile foundation construction recommendations should be based on actual structural requirements, which were not available at the time this report was written. The following pile design values should be used for planning purposes only, and should be modified when actual structural requirements are available. Higher and lower values for vertical and lateral load bearing capacity are possible by varying pile design. Augercast piles with a minimum diameter of 18 inches will be capable of supporting axial compressive loads on the order of 50 tons when embedded a minimum distance of 10 feet into the lower, dense gravel, bearing stratum. Allowable design loads may be increased by one-third for short term wind or seismic loading. Anticipated settlements of pile supported structures will generally be on the order of ' inch. Each pile can be assumed to provide a 15-ton uplift capacity, provided the minimum pile length and embedment are achieved. The uplift capacity does not include the weight of the pile. It should also be noted that augercast piles may be required to penetrate thin dense and/or gravelly layers that are not considered to be of sufficient thickness and areal extent for support of the structure. A thin soil horizon of this type was encountered at depths between approximately 10 and 17 feet in boring EB-4. It is expected that pile installation at this site will encounter variable conditions, and that considerable field judgement on the part of the geotechnical engineer and special inspector may be required. We anticipate that pile lengths may vary between approximately 25 and 35 feet to achieve the required embedment into the dense bearing layers. In any case, no piles shorter than 25 feet are recommended. 10.3 Lateral Pile Capacity Although the majority of lateral resistance to wind and seismic loading will be generated by the grade beams, the piles will provide an additional capacity of 7 tons (applied at the pile top). This capacity assumes a fixed head pile with '/a inch of allowable deflection at the ground surface. A depth of fixity at 18 feet should be assumed for pile reinforcement design. Piles within 10 feet of another pile along the direction of force should be considered to be in the zone of influence and the lateral capacity of only one of these piles should be used in design. If the lateral contribution of the piles is more critical to the practical design of the structure, we can provide a comprehensive lateral pile analysis. Such an analysis would present lateral pile capacities taking into account the interaction between piles. Selected lateral deflection and moment values for fixed-headed, 18-inch-diameter augercast piles, based on a maximum applied lateral load of 7 tons at the top of the pile, are summarized in the following table. These values were calculated in accordance with Non-Dimensional Solutions for Laterally Loaded Piles with Soil Modulus Assumed Proportional to Depth, by Reese and Matlock: 13 Moment and Deflection vs. Depth for 18-Inch Augercast Pile 1 Depth below Pile Cap (Ft) Moment (1,000 Ftlb) Deflection (in) 0 -70 .5 5 -7 .35 10 +17.5 .12 15 +12.5 0 20 0 0 Notes: 1. Based on Applied Lateral Load of 7 tons, and on fixed-head conditions. 10.4 Pile Inspections The actual total length of each pile may be adjusted in the field based on required capacity and conditions encountered during drilling. Since completion of the pile takes place below ground, the judgment and experience of the geotechnical engineer or his field representative must be used as a basis for determining the required penetration and acceptability of each pile. Consequently, use of the presented pile capacities in the design requires that all piles be inspected by a qualified geotechnical engineer or engineering geologist from our firm who can interpret and collect the installation data and examine the contractors operations. AESI, acting as the owner's field representative, would determine the required lengths of the piles and keep records of pertinent installation data. A final summary report would then be distributed, following completion of pile installation. 10.5 Passive Resistance and Friction Factors If grade beams and foundation walls are placed on grade and then backfilled, the top of the compacted structural backfill must be horizontal and extend outward from the footing for a minimum lateral distance equal to three times the height of the backfill, before tapering down to grade. With backfill placed as discussed, footings may be designed for passive resistance against lateral translation using an equivalent fluid equal to 225 pcf , neglecting the upper 2 feet of embedment below the ground surface. Passive resistance values include a factor of safety equal to 3 in order to reduce the amount of movement necessary to generate passive resistance. The friction coefficient for footings cast directly on undisturbed, loose to medium dense, recompacted soils may be taken as 0.32. This is an ultimate value and does not include a safety factor. Since it will be difficult to excavate these soils without disturbance, the soil under the footings must be recompacted to a minimum of 90 percent of the above-mentioned standard for this value to apply. 14 • 11.0 FLOOR SUPPORT Due to the loose subsurface soil conditions, and the corresponding risk of unacceptable floor slab settlement, we recommend that the floor be supported on:the pile foundation system. The floor slab should be underlain by a capillary break layer consisting of 4 inches of pea gravel or washed rock. Alternatively, a material could be selected so long as it is free of organics, demolition waste, and other deleterious materials, and possesses a grain size distribution that matches the following criteria: 100 percent passing the 2-inch sieve, 0 to 70 percent passing the US number 4 Sieve, and 3 percent or less passing the U.S. number 200 Sieve, based on the fraction passing the US number 4 Sieve. The floor should also be provided with an impervious moisture barrier. If interior moisture sensitive finishes are planned, a waterproofing layer is also recommended. • • 12.0 DRAINAGE CONSIDERATIONS All retaining and footing walls should be provided with a drain at the footing elevation. Drains should consist of rigid, perforated, PVC pipe surrounded byy washed pea gravel. The level of the perforations in the pipe should be set approximately 2 inches below the bottom of the footing, and the drains should be constructed with sufficient gradient to allow gravity discharge away from the building. In addition, all retaining walls should be lined with a minimum 12-inch-thick washed gravel blanket, provided over the full-height of the wall, that ties into the footing drain. Roof and surface runoff should not discharge into the footing drain system but should be handled by a separate, rigid, tight line drain. In planning, exterior grades adjacent to walls should be sloped downward away from the structure to achieve surface drainage. 13.0 PROJECT DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION MONITORING At the time of this report, site grading, structural plans, and construction methods have not been finalized and the recommendations presented herein are preliminary. We are available to provide additional geotechnical consultation as the project design develops and possibly changes from that upon which this report is based. We recommend that AESI perform a geotechnical review of the plans prior to final design completion. In this way, our earthwork and foundation recommendations may be properly interpreted and implemented in the design. We are also available to provide geotechnical engineering and monitoring services during construction. The integrity of the foundation depends on proper site preparation and construction procedures. In addition, engineering decisions may have to be made in the field in the event that variations in subsurface conditions become apparent. 15 We have enjoyed working with you on this study and are confident that these recommendations will aid in the successful completion of your project. If you should have any questions, or require further assistance, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. Kirkland, Washington • 4� w E o 4 .•r o is! "Sib 0 it. �235.,0 �9 4.) - .C,• s�' JSTE? G.. `TONAL EXPIRES 11 /2:±, . Kurt D. MerE. Project Geologist Senior Geotechnical Engineer Ronald . Parker, P.G. Principal BWG/mb KE99087G1 4/1/99 mb-WPS 16 ♦ 1 M • LEGEND ; _ EP-1 III Approximate location of exploration pit EB-1 • Approximate location I of exploration boring I 4 ----L ! it I )I • \\... _ (,,,,/ 11 i II 1. r- i / t 1 I` III\ 11 II I ' ` ? 2F1 ! 1 .-- \ i -)I -, 13 m 0, N Q 0 0A t 0 t ' 0 130 260 O ,_ REFERENCE: ROTH HILL. FEET O .K FIGURE ASSOCIATED ?��SCIEN 8CIENCE8, INC 4 LOG OF EXPLORATION PIT NO. EP-1 This log is part of the report prepared by Associated Earth Sciences Inc.(AESI)for the named project and should be read together with that report for complete interpretation.This summary applies only to the location of this trench at the time of excavation.Subsurface conditions may change at this location with the passage of = time.The data presented are a simplfication of actual conditions encountered. a) DESCRIPTION _ Topsoil and grass. 1 — Loose, moist, brown, fine SAND, little silt, tract to little fine gravel. (Fill) 2 — — 3 — 4 _ I 5 — 6 — — i 7 — 8 — 9 --1 Exploration pit terminated at approximately 8.5 feet _ No seepage; moderate caving 0' -8.5'. 10 — 11 12 — 13 — 14 — 15 — 16 17 — 18 — 19 - 20 Renton High School Project No. KE99087G Renton,Washington March 1999 0, LU a la ASSOCIATED Logged by: BG EARTH SCIENCES, INC Approved by: • LOG OF EXPLORATION PIT NO. EP-2 This log is part of the report prepared by Associated Earth Sciences Inc.(AESI)for the named project and should be read together with that report for complete interpretation.This summary applies only to the location of this trench at the time of excavation.Subsurface conditions may change at this location with the passage of _ time.The data presented are a simplfication of actual conditions encountered. a a) DESCRIPTION Loose, moist, mottled brown, silty fine SAND, little to some fine gravel. (Fill) 1 — 2 — 3 — 4 — • 5 — _ —I 6 — Exploration pit terminated at approximately 5.5 feet _ No seepage; no caving. 7 — 8 — 9 — 10 11 • _ 12 — 13 - 14 — 15 — 16 — 17 — 18 — 19 — 20 Renton High School Project No. KE99087G Renton,Washington 0. March 1999 JIM W C9 ASSOCIATED Logged by: BG EARTH ir SCIENCES, INC Approved by: CkN iNs LOG OF EXPLORATION PIT NO. EP-3 This log is part of the report prepared by Associated Earth Sciences Inc. (AESI)for the named project and should be read together with that report for complete interpretation.This summary applies only to the location of this trench at the time of excavation.Subsurface conditions may change at this location with the passage of time.The data presented are a simplfication of actual conditions encountered. m DESCRIPTION Grass and topsoil. 1 _ Loose, moist, mottled brown, silty fine SAND, some fine gravel. (Fill) 2 — 3 — 4 — 5 — 6 - - Exploration pit terminated at approximately 6 feet 7 _ No seepage; no caving. 8 - - 9 10 — 11 - - 12 — 13 — 14 — 15 — 16 — 17 — 18 — 19 — 20 Renton High School Project No. KE99087G Renton, Washington March 1999 W a 0 gi /NW ASSOCIATED Logged by: BG EARTH SCIENCES, INC Approved by: LOG OF EXPLORATION PIT NO. EP-4 • This log is part of the report prepared by Associated Earth Sciences Inc. (AESI)for the named project and should be read together with that report for complete interpretation.this summary applies only to the location of this trench at the time of excavation.Subsurface conditions may change at this location with the passage of time.The data presented are a simplfication of actual conditions encountered. a DESCRIPTION _ Topsoil and grass. 1 — Loose, moist, brown, fine SAND, little silt, some fine gravel. (Fill) 2 3 — 4 — 5 — 6 — 7 — 8 Loose, moist, brown, fine SAND, little silt, some fine gravel. (Alluvium) 9 — 10 — 11 Exploration pit terminated at approximately 11 feet 12 Incipient ground water @ 11'; no caving. 13 14 15 —1 16 — • 17 • 18 _ 19 — 20 Renton High School Project No. KE99087G Renton,Washington March 1999 0 ASSOCIATED Logged by: BG EARTH g F SCIENCES, INC Approved by: !iyQ LOG OF BORING NO. EB-1 Sheet 1 of 1 Date drilled March 11, 1999 Elevation (ft) 35 � N a) E 3 DESCRIPTION a co _ co m 0 o co F- 0 a Grass and topsoil. S 1 T 6 Moist, dark brown and tan (mixed), siltyfine SAND and—fine SAND, ace silt, with trace fine _ gravel. (Fill) Wet, mottled tan, silty—fine SANND. (Recent Alluvium) 5 S-2 T 1 ° 10 S-3 I Saturated, gray, fine sandy SILT (NP). (Alluvium) 15— S-4 I 9 Gray and brown, silty fine SAND. (Alluvium) Brown, fine to coarse sandy, fine GRAVEL, trace silt. (Alluvium) 20— S-5 26 25- S-6 36 grades to dense 30— S7 37 Bottom of boring at depth 31.5 feet 35- 40— This log is part of the report prepared by AESI for the named project and should be read together with that report for complete interpretation. This < summary applies only at the location o(this boring and at the time of drilling. Subsurface conditions may differ at other locations and may change at this location with the passage of time. The data presented is a simplification of actual conditions encountered. a arc?,: rik ASSOCIATED Renton High School • Project No. SCIENCEARTH ES,SCIENCES, INC Renton,Washington • KE99087G • I I. - 7 LOG OF BORING NO. EB-2 Sheet 1 of 1 Date drilled March 11. 1999 Elevation•(ft) 35 N N_ (.1) ' n P E a o DESCRIPTION co m o F— a Grass and topsoil. _ S-1 I 8 Moist, -6r d dark gray mixed, silty fne SARD. (Fill) 5 S 2 To Wet, mottled brown, fine sandy SILT. (Recent Alluvium) • S-3 T o Wet, interbedded gray, silty fine SAND and fine sandy SILT. (Alluvium) 15 S-4 I 5 Wet to saturated, brown, silty fine SAND. (Alluvium) 20_ S 5 20 Wet, brown, fine gravelly, fine to coarse SAND, trace to little silt. (Alluvium) 25- S-6I 1 25 30_ S-7 19 35— Bottom of boring at depth 35 feet 40— ai m m rn This log is part of the report prepared byAESI for the named project and should be read together with that report for complete interpretation. This < summary applies only at the location of thisboring and at the time of drilling. Subsurface conditions may differ at other locations and may change at this location with the passage of time. The data presented is a simplification of actual conditions encountered. rg "Mk ASSOCIATED Renton High School Project No. EARTH Renton,Washington KE99087G SCIENCES, INC '' a h LOG OF BORING NO. EB-3 Sheet 1 of 1 Date drilled March 11, 1999 Elevation (ft) 35 4, N a L E E- DESCRIPTION m m n v o a o In a- S-1 T Grass and topsoil. I 5 Moist, dark gray, silty fine SAND. Till) - I 5— S-2 I Damp, brown, fine SAND, trace silt. (Recent Alluvium) 10_ S-3 25 Moist, mottled brown, fine to coarse sandy, fine GRAVEL, trace silt. (Alluvium) _ I 15— S-4 I 5 Saturated, mottled brown, fine SAND, some silt. (Alluvium) 20— S-5 I 18 Saturated, gray, fine SAND, some fine gravel, coarse sand, trace silt. (Alluvium) 25— S-6 123 Saturated, brown, fine to coarse sandy fine gravel, trace silt; fines content not representative due to washing. 30-1 S-7 40 Saturated, brown, fine SAND, little to some fine gravel, trace silt. (Alluvium) 35— S-8 — 25 Bottom of boring at depth 36.5 feet 40— (1, m m o This log is part of the report prepared by AESI for the named project and should be read together with that report for complete interpretation. This summary applies only at the location of this boring and at the time of drilling. Subsurface conditions may differ at other locations and may change at this location with the passage of time. The data presented is a simplification of actual conditions encountered. ASSOCIATED Renton High SchoolEART Project No. ISCIENCES KE99087G , INC Renton,Washington 94. . I. • LOG OF BORING NO. EB-4 Sheet 1 of 1 Date drilled March 11, 1999 Elevation (ft) 35 d) CV N N -0 E a -2 DESCRIPTION m co ❑ o co I- o_ N Grass and topsoil. Moist, dark gray, silty fine SAND, trace brick. (Fill) 5 S-1 — 9 Moist, mottled brown, fine gravelly, fine to medium SAND, trace silt. (Recent Alluvium) • 10 S 2 26 Damp, mottled brown, fine to coarse sandy, fine GRAVEL, trace silt. (Alluvium) 15— S-3 123 grades with little to some sand 1 20 S-4 4 Wet, gray, silty fine SAND, trace organic. (Alluvium) 25_ S-5 I 2 30 S-6 119 Saturated, gray and oxidized brown, fine GRAVEL, trace silt, little fine to coarse sand. (Alluvium) 35_ S-7 38 Saturated, oxidized brown, fine GRAVEL, some fine to coarse sand, little silt. (Alluvium) 40— S-8 e ' 53 Bottom of boring at depth 41.5 feet • 2. This log is part of the report prepared byAESI for the named project and should be read together with that report for complete interpretation. This osummary applies only at the location of thisboring and at the time of drilling. Subsurface conditions may differ at other locations and may change at this location with the passage of time. The data presented is a simplification of actual conditions encountered. a ASSOCIATED Renton High School Project No. EARTH KE99087G s SCIENCES, INC Renton,Washington J E3 • 7 TZ3N R5E E 1/2 • ) , -1:—i7-07-14ce.' 1 :m—I 1 ' , \ 1 0-14 io /.- LI , . cA IL ( P ) , \'—il 3rd P . i \ , , , \ \ ' , / cow . co CO 1 CA ) ,.....,....--....... co, ',. \ __.1 1111 P — 1 , \.. --.. . , / IQ-) I 4 , › \\ \ Rir:s) \ ., .. ...:,...,____ ) Airport, Way e . 1 NN \ R -8 "-- d 1 ..-1 N N R-8 ' . a) , !CAI ! IS -i I illie.11111 It \ N / x ., • , , I —1 N „ N N / Fri \ I 1 I eliA I I I I I I I _ , 1 1cr. ---I I CA , —.. hil 13 1--STTotla St, 1 1 , ----1 1 Hi 1 °- -CD . I P • i .-\- c , t . \ 16 1:7Z1.1 --L, H 1 I r rel-13 1 t i 1 R-18 1 a 1 1"--cC. - _____ 1-1,4 "lij 1 - ____. letOto Ili i c'r) CA ' • ...... .... N N ---1 10 0 11\ 1 RM , ..__. 7-U Pt --10 ..Z4, C D ( P ) , .i,_ ._._ _. ,,., , RM- ! I ' d s - 1 r C A 6. H .---- los ....., , ! - -I -C • • I • ' i - ! ,-. i RM-U pig 1 . 12, • S 2nd St CD CD . ____ to S 2nd Sf. / v. , • _ . ..._.,.,...r 110 - , ... r1=MI 10 I I I I .- --• 1 . “-n 1 1 1 r • - . 1 -- -‘, -CD- , Ii l'i ..._ . ... ... . ........._ O '') ;..._ ) , . --- &J..— --1 • CD . u. ..... I f ._C A _ .-11-LI,_C. D I -fin— CD ---• " • il, 04 i ...... --,...•-• 4 " 1 i - - TY--/-1 . C14) -.-- ----z----4a) CD CD --. iu. i o A , / ! , ---------- S 3rd St.! CD-c4 CI* I:4- .11............-------.. 1 i r . tO • *.- I I , i , - • 1 ! ba „- II/ -10WPI" ! : 1 : ! ! CD CI) u) CD1 ' ci) CD ' , , A . , 1 I -4—) , I . 1 —12 1Cri • , ‘ Pl. ---0 — ....._.0411plor ••••••mr lonm .m. a ‘‘.. ----•"\ - I.! CD CD(P) e \N$ \ \. . • - -N CD 0-- CD 9 ‘ 1 is \ \ \ -- , \ \ \..., • .. -S •S ..' cn. :-17.: ---\ - cp.- 0 -A. ...........-- ,, D CD :-- cip icri-7) \ .----- , .(?).-., C A CDCo CD CD , .- he :.-.-.r7 . (:)\ ,e5_-- .____ CD "JD CD 49 .•+%7„.: __..... ___._ _........ ,„ CD . \ \ ,..,, •-'". \ C.v --- • -- • .-- CD \ et .: X. - --- - --. .' '' ' ' D al CD(155 _ --- .-1 > 1-- - \ 7: ti.. i' \\ ..' . CA ,, ..,.% 0..c. _ •. ,...s , .01•••••••,IMM•11•1 •••11=11•11•1,•IIMIMMINI 11•111•1•1 1•1111•11 _.... Cn Cn : -... 1 ta k '''. ..•• , :, T ::::::. a -2_ M__ - .1.-E - 1=1 D.-- ---1 i._ -.M •X Mil x._ P x_ • ____ _i ecs ._-:-"r `i ___z_-_- ai 1 . __.-. - •- -! ..--,...•-•- CI) D-..____ 4--> _x -.(._.., - - ix__ 7.__ 6- li- . •i -- 1 - , • t .............. -.2 al WS +++ 11 C A !,- ce " Ce . • 1 S , .1.+++4.• II A wo .7' h, ' ./ \\,... ÷ 4. + • . _1...m. .. .. ..... .., /....... • ..\ 4. + 4. + ,+ + + _• i --) • _ 1 I 1 r Ai , + + _Ts ,+ pnypw TECHNICAL sERvicits G3 - 19 T23N R5E E 1/2 -ON 0 0 ,.? ZONING ii_ni '''P/1.7 yr.% .e'ND./ 12/1.0/943 ? 1; ;?0 4/0 1:4800 F3 18 T23N R5E E 1/2 u r.p.. - o CITY OF RENTON o , -%2, . : Wz... 1 ••LL Planning/Building/Public Works 1055 South Grady Way - Renton Washington 98055 i v.) ►- a :'r,;;,`, w Q 3g ,►ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED a tiSPOKA rDMUIR + 130600-000D_oz RENrON SCHOOL 435 MAIN AVE SDISt 403 RENTON WA T 712777 RENT435 980552040 1798 20 09/20/99 FORWARD TIME EXP RTN TO SEND :RENTON SCHOOL DISTRI 300 SW 7TH ST RENrON WA 98055-2307 Aet V"p. 1111tlSllidklfildfilillaudilailllddd lidfnhIII ci p CITY OF ENT vN o �_: NA Planning/Building/Public Works ` ash"' �� '. 1055 South Grady Way - Renton Washington 98055-- SEP 0 3 9 9 _j•aaa « 0 .3 O g a PB METER * ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED a 7204260 s POSTAGE NOT DELIVERABLE AS ADDRESSED UNABLE TO FORWARD_ NO SUCH# ATTEMPTED,NOT KNOWN REFUSED _ INSUFFICIENT ADDRESS MOVED,LEFT NO ADDRESS e // DECEASED UNCLAIMED BOX LOSED, NO FWD __�/ VACANT �1 NO RECEPTACLE 7`� INITIALS �l)RTE 722930-0020-00 7",`�'` FATTORE ROBERT L 809999 109 S TILLICUM ST � RENTON MA 98055 i�� NOT BE/l'ir' i r:'_t t ^'Q•^�,� ,,,..4 _ i {�F',F$n>i) 1 d3S L tS Ar Ut 'MAPLE Y', S,:'''.,'�,`,) co 4 ! rn Wry �, L t f LRETURN T:l ; P:r'Cl 7 �.2-.6•G. i i i i iii { { �� { { {{ { { { { { { 1� i a s t {?It{,t t ttt t tt tt? t ? t ?t ? t t?t ._..._.__.. __ . _ Z i�?�?if??�=.t1????i?iti{?1?itil?! a 0 CITY OF RENTON a �,;.. .---.;. T••+i Planning/Building/Public Works REASON ca ®/~� 055 South Grady Way Renton Washington 98055 unclaimedHECK �-�''�''� °C ►- SO 161$ �:�mil—Aly - 0 3 Q 5 fp Refused _ r,• ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED Attempted Knp =555r5►►►►' Tjp42bp U.S. POSTAGE No Sueh Nor - , No Such Office In State _Do not remail in this envelope BERT ROBERTS 'J. 999999 1 - 1/4-) 4 280 HARDIE AVE SW ` Q /\ RENTON WA Ck' le y'. ,. i \ A C,.; ) 1.j . _- . ,J±i1\,4, , 1 `4T 0 .' l 7? .4 `rl'- k ii1..1,4,11„?:F M I,Hj IF i!j 2I j I31 y „ p CITY OF RF,NTON o r t �uYi�►. ,;, w r� fail Planning/Building/Public Works • s „ • 1055 South Grady Way - Renton Washington 98055 w ►- SEP 4��81 Q .3 Q 5 • i ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED a w PBMS lq ; 7204260 U.S. POSTAGE , NOT DELIVERABLE AS ADDRESSED UNABLE TO FORWARD NO SUCH# ATTEMPTED,NOT KNOWN REFUSED INSUFFICIENT ADDRESS_ MOVED,LEFT NO ADDRESS DECEASED UNCLAIMED BOX CLOS NO FWD VACANT' NO RECEPTACLE INITIAL j TE#�/ t � kV 1 722930-0.020-00 FA TTORE R08ERT L RENTS TILLICUM ST 809999 FT DELIVEREBLE "e 1r66/'"`� AS ADDRESSED . �” / d3S a 98055 I UNABLE TO FQRWAR RETURN TC1.SENDER K VllC��, �'!$i 's:.2s2 (iiiiduidi,,,,titutiiniliifi,eii►lii,iEi{ietlliiiliiiilii;{iliillitlifill cy © CITY 0— _ ENTON o N - ,,�= : , .It Planning/Building/Public Works "' ®s�'" le og �r�•;a F.1055 South Grady Way - Renton Washington 98055 co SEP 0 3 9 9 ��_ 5 CC CC ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED a'" JO 4260 U.S. POSTAGE 09 04 99 FCM F'RESDRTE1) SEA IA 981 182305 —9077-07 R1279 rn �\ ilu KWAI SHUN6 H SUE !\ WESTWIND MOTEL 98040 HERER ISLAND WA ,_ ._. 'A MO.,74 2.76 2 U 11111111111!i!it 11 iU1111111111111'!!111LI 111 II!11111;!i a 0 CITY OF RENTON ir- ' ..2 ....._____...=.8- ci Planning/Building/Public Works tt 1 cc ,.., /fllow AI 70 0 ri.;7 Vil • * r) SEP 03'99 Oe.4f 411 :: 0 3 0 5 1055 South Grady Way - Renton Washington 98055 _ - - Accian . _ : 4 ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED _ PB METER - . !I . • 7204260 U.S. POSTAGE tr ii' 090494 4pEs * DRJED SEA WA 981 4, e eht147**0 iite 4tte stea /rep 4 op A,•Sile„.401a,„ ,....***%*, .11C, Pe..•• lko '710cbeitt 4°1 t gil! law 00 , _, .. •.- - - ,,;;„,-'0 L.:" ' 410 Stich $6, 410,,j0%, 1 5.,„030,. ../ 9 569600-024 ., BERT ROBERT 5 . . 17021, Ofeeep I ..' -el/4 411 ••.,, 280 HARDIE AVE SW RENTON WA -- 4,,:i, ,,,,,',,2,,,.: , 8' 055 orksiree••••„, 4 ebiez.„.... wobe- ,,, • _ svA-0-1-0,514322213222- 1.\11111\11\iiii1111111111\11Mii ii1;11:1!1,1,11,1,111;:11:::1:1,IIIHM:11,:a - -, © CITY OF RENTON r.. •41. Planning/Building/Public Works W n ��r..� ,T 1055 South Grady Way Renton Washington 98055 W I- SEP 0 3 9 9 00—� `amalimee••••••••••morl : Q 3 0 g a� • ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED a PBM6TER * 7204260 U.S. POSTAGE _, - 1'L,j_ �Y1'- 380600-0065-02 RENTON SCHOOL OIST 403 712777 435 MAIN AVE S RENTON WA RENT435 980553002 1798 14 09/09/99 FORWARD TIME EXP RTN TO SEND : RENTON SCHOOL DISTRI 300 SW 7TH ST RENTON WA ' t O55-23O/ RETURN TO t SENDERj { / ) ! j J iJ ! SarS a -2',2 •4:L' ij i i 1 u� 4 1 1 1 I� 1 1lliliiltlltil .LI 11!!i�1�1�117iltll)Fliil Ii?iii ti i! iliiiiifiiiilii .i _REVIsIOP 17 f 5 .1 JI-1 l t - OSOUTHEAST P.A.C. ELEVATION - - �,__ � f. _.. _. J 0 • _ , 1- o� x1- 0 t O O EAST P.A.C. ELEVATION « = o I eie7 xe« 1ro -r-o g O `o 80. i gHO . 5 W Z 'i s cc Q w '.. [__ti,=jrI_.I ! I MATERIALS LEGEND t, 'Ir 71/1•-/ n - mi:inn I Z � t o x-seoez _ IIFlIIII 'II ,w�K.A<m..c F1Ev—z y I e,.o.., f L �„ ,: STUCCO MS....,cn..s DAM co GE ONORTHWESTo.P.A.C. ELEVATION A ELEVATIONS 2 >-,•••°"•°'.•,•'• WALE:1/11`-to• ...:4.---i*V ''''T 4-: ':* i -''''COI lif .11 4, 4•-: : ' -,'N4 -•%.--- 4 % I. , f a [12k..,//,:igt.' " - - . 4 ,---4- --1•60., . 44. Rpie .,i..,..4 • / / , .• '15 i ; . . I. Jr I ,7, -4--..• I)4 6' _.....rn ..,,^ -ZE. -., '447 •'im.I....1E1 '"14y,anew A AIM ' :''' , .. • • STEVE;ISI AVE NW-414.1 f g 1 1 k-.114•, -.,.,.ir 0---4.-;,,,,,....41tir ..itilikr,,,,viailm, IA PAM.'E - i'IV rt ori at 11,3 114,*..._ , • ..s, /;•7 -1,_,. 1 ti,,,r="M iM.' • ,, r' 4-] wArIEM •1 py:',17!, tit.4 ov "Ilyt ••;:-.1.4• 0.....,ttr..k. i, , „,, , .... . 11 1 k't?' 1%, t' N',• -%-- „..../4.,: ilir . ..,,,,, , „ ,,,,,,,,„. , ......... i. . AVE. 7AW. , ,I 7 soommin. ,-,--,?4,4, -: ,''-..t._ ° '' VI ; ' *V4912.11 PE ;P --P" kaA, ..'tir ,u.A f•.:g 1-..., .1: . lie r'ars.i k ' ' .. •_., fi .. ,..4. „. , ,a....illt;,4 Nor r .. „t: , . .i, :'N'il A', - . ;. . • 1 .• r , ' `;',„ ° --wtrir ,ft-•,..gx.44/I g,4 All -- 1.4 , 4,0,cal, :::::.., •....,AVE. .. NW. Is' 14 j.,1 Kr.1.71,1111M 1 1 , ! ,y IA...••_,=, . ,, .1:1 1.„je i ,I,Lialakia•ra., 32111.17,t.[ , _........,.., . .. , 2,,„„ „,„„,,,cons .=1, * x„i . . • . -.,-,•:, °2111 11411 ' '1 ,-, .•. p 4, ....141rodliiirillp. Era" 1 .40.,e',..e._;..,`11."---4 V '"'''''.77fr:„.....,,, ',,,,. \ 114 ., lejith i italeihr t a. .. = .1 ' ' ' . -, • 4, at . 1 , _ . .„.lig'Poljizir. - TAYLOR AVE. N.W I • L...._ 1111 ii ,4P ( ..4. 1 •-1 ,-— :44 1-•• _ .ra.11§1 I leijOr. !Ii.-,t, • .t.--7.-e % t 1 , e . t.4 I I I . .4 \, . ! ,,,.-•-\4__11,1), 'I,,,, ..,.T_ ,Ili illtli '47.1'4,-. 1; "1"\.,\Ty-".... ..,.,0 ,-.„--- ..-, %,;',7t,‘ - .,141t-liik • 'ill:'AVE. ,, 7 4.A. 1.4...AROSE rb .447 • . , „ , „.Ai MI u., 4, .., 11 ' i t r ,-,.. -,,0 ,,, \ . 1 ra ft, Ilia . ill S •113. ' ' . N f , i. ! *5 r....way r stet( n :::_-- r.,---4•==. 1 , r-.-,-__ ',-t ..‘,'', .‘ ,.;i . , . Ill q'..1. • ,•r,,,ext El .. ,. 0 ilt 0000.40...-:- % \,:';'',..: •- ill .. 1:11;ipiiiiime'e',A31,-81, .0 ,,- b- . - ......,,,.. .. ..,,;‘,.....1.„•, -•,,,,,: r",,_. v.' v.-4 -.: . 947 4,r,---• e LANE 00 AVE .. S. • r.? .., s'''' '11 73 g'''1 ' . ,.,. ,1 I sMP'"!-'''' 'Pr"411, WS, . 111 • I ii " . ..,•'-'i..1-rizaw l '''1 L'2. =•.1 kali.i , ,s, — .. .-, •1 ra E.,,,2 U 0 '141. gg 1 " l'ill-Ild ,,,'-' it 7 main ,,,, idt Fn. •,;„"..:;-_,. k.1,Pf L 'i :F-,.-, •r9.3 »rm.' ',‘, I INfinliggi c"card...14-irl— An; %4- ? , ,, 13 it I 6H TTVCA:1 _, a letclit#1911.,;',48-1 - MY'.-wp•ig i :-------_------- --------,.‘1,,..• 41.E5iN - 0 i _q_._,__n _. .1 ,( __.„__ i,_,. , . wt. , n, r "Cr : Tr:3 ---- ! WAIMMI s . . . Y4h._ - he : ,,,, 615,...1 ‘;;:::,' LO...p j- r `11=1:1=t-i• m IA 6 m'l PA"'1:4-Trildirl'i 4 ". : FM '4'4-%'•---1 k /, - .4.1111WRC:;-W7 • ..—I---- *..."1(O di.e/ttiAigg t tiak.rx,.,t a iir blii- -&---. i § :,. . - P. . ' ..i•I-i iiia r' -,-• . .. .-, \ \ ras .41,,,...•-„I E_3- I ..•;\_,,,7c/1 -I ''........----"-- -II -"`'• Elli.ii A' i'l'r & to.,:..4P ely oi W .„'' ,r40.1 ••• Z;;' ....-‘-"--- %pp....iii i - ri i I 4 r'''.5:1- '.."''\wt5-•1 .,-.,'.1r'rinirri:: ir.••••-,jr: 1, • mils. _., el..7 4_ *14:2 ttlagrilbi-42 FA.5741/! m., . 1 ?,. lw.,•••., "I'MIE 6:11.1.4",;;:.e..1'I:L--1 Ns/a IA ''', „. ) dmi• 08'11 -----jis; . :':''---"-/-11::/t,:la..114.:12s,, ____;; 111ri lin3 I." lq-t. --- '' ' 4P SA3'''''" ir '..i'.s— I;ki.TIP/7 / )‘ '', Ii161.;11."-in \ . iigigg-Am ...11, _ . . .. L.FPf.41,o, ,% • E: ,11,. , ","„.1 ..,,,,,rilremdc.......__ t/11,%i...,_ \ 1K T..._,.5.,,:j.-IL cst T•_.. ..., p ri, 1 u:.:1 ... lv,4 1141113444a41*---144. '' 111/gt:.'411-1 , 7 ‘f6.!4* . 1 ' 'L7... '... BURLINGTON NOFTHERN INC ,, -,tiv4e4-4- . i I -/ . • , -=;',;;;-4.-.-., k': •t * ,,t,..., .,...„ ., Z.\ ; :ILL, •.--'' • • • --.I - ,V: ,. „ .;,0...,' . '9 I., '43 .\\•ET T AVE. # S. '. 1 e e„..• 4 4.445 / lit 0;x i ,,, ,,,,. im........ _0 re Mimi-him. N "Ir--t-rzra-9-----C44-,,b.:I-I-I:4:4r:'-'7171' ' "7''7.."__dL.. ' afiell. i ti- 3 .g . '..,. -• 1 4% s .---1:——,'-TOWNE T .———AVE—•—•—IV--e.;"-4 lal'egir71'.45 -Tr''''''5 41:111ti.,.'cl'IA,‘i1A;411.d.1 /- 4. .E •..,,,_=....viily; .1s,,iiniz.ar i WILLIAMS.y i AVE • 4 1 S' - . . ,. .,.., • ,..,.... wi Is... _..v... ,..,s , ,.-1 .. r . .- Ct.I-I!!4 641ff'7)rix _itgyligi/4 MAININUI"'''-:...I. .. -4v 6 i JikEhrmk 1-, t"I— ePt- li"II M°13"Aifo kilifitliTPLIR""Tic''''' '''. .'1 z -,. -W/LL/AMS AVE , N ,IA ''•0 A.. e :•, '\ .P.:4.:P Lilt ig EPI r 11 _el 5114 .* 4,•3 /:-S, --'‘4..G-r: , :;Id ii.;-..,Are1-2-11',._ WELLS AVE = s i 5. ../Q ,,,, o•i!,. - • 4..cs1,,,• or:Er 1_ 0 111111,1-116B " - 1•Yi:4111141110ICK 2j..-2"F• 14,6y-r! 1101 -.,i,I1 glEriiiiiit '4:till Irsevm . '''ti4, 'r '' 1"211° ', -H14.1at''3'.1./ "I'''''N'n • ., II ,...-.. .4* .,„... ,. ., . MA/N . AVE ':.,d S '91. '6. . , ,,,,,ur AuggiviR'53E1EN-iiig,'51 MICD1-2 41 . Minn I. q irifiv ., -, , ib,o•Te.wit• 4.-yo r .,.„ 44 r o 4.,;...,____... . .... . ----____,_t„. '....6%Jr211•07 I.z•lir-4•:'1--‘-,,,n: .17*It'll), -• 1..'e 06...Ntf'. AAWEDEN Eit121:1nlifilt]q, ,VrffironE:lit,, •___ _ '4, .••••• ,-441.,I lilt,-..iiimiz,„•, ., - ,, „,• R_ pEL Ly ...' A VE N ••"•••••%,... A71 1. :kr l'4110 .-1 ,-I . ' ',.., .t Eli.11.4110011111727,:!1'52: #,IL:09211.4"09.1 MILL • ,AVE -•••••""Ny , rw 2OG P:1710k1 CAMaig *:‘''''''' C..- 1101,11111 Icv-VrioN'•10: - - ,, rn (4 rffEr5iiiil kt"iiil:(1i rt ki-i'W.TUFiii fl._i41 .6119bt,:ks :\ , xilik 7-"*.--tF4 :/",'"f .' ' PARK AVE 'IN Ivr- si‘,71:' % ' N;!.. '4) /;/".- a----'-.' ..ttigi;'"7-i411141.1:1--r--411-' ,(•:-•"—"'." - 4 . .,- ..., ., , yp ,,,,• ,-- * i \\\' • rz`'4* 1.:'`. E :-, .:- •.7,,,', 0, 1111g1 . '9.•••,'I °ly'S I 4 — 1 , I fihil, .,,,,..z. _ 41 ,le q ...; \ f, -,,- -74 ; '1/4.1. -"Por?"... 1 ' u;ri ts•901F4 OM a 0 ril , .0 1 s"4. ."" 1 1 -ei _11-111MIMIng. ". ,s\ ''Y ..,,,",-..--, - „. '.._\:,; . -__.4%-Is•41.' - '' s • ' ' - CARDEN AVE N 4. 'Th Milli 61.411:! p -/' -.7-wit ,.. • 4,-c. , : \\\ IN'', ; 11::::tf:11:1611a,' Triiiiliqle 2 F.::0321E; i \• -sek, ' -i i / i 11 ) 1- • , , on ••s. otwn.,..asag.• '/ 1511161;%4•. . ' -Plh .411:110M1 ra IV lel a a 0 1. I *. ZO 2WEEE MEADOW AVE N r., ___ .i. ., ,1 ' r• .N,_ : i Ilk\ '•-.Z...t•-•., - (.' 1 % Hillpf gni.::15 ..:0.r•-2 ( '.'1 Elk%.5112:121EN ifigiliELIK ,.,, ... ,4a S ,.., , '. .:'•, 4' s FAC TORY •. AVE e N ... •. ,,5 „,..- :.,- ,,oa0 l• l' ,,,7 o P. 'f''' ' 2"9'g 1 kil i ;33 ,e i I' IP On ti /* Is , •.* -____+ y.- •7).,,,,,c,"•.•,._.. -',.,-..,<.. ..c./wm,).1..„.,.. ---,.,.:‘,2- .: c.,,,B., . 11 I I II —_ L Cn I ' I J Imo 1 L / 61. 0.4) I I r L l: I'III : I1ffl - gi • , a°i mp 1 1 1 ltF � SEE i -ill 1 F- I'll F� 1 1` I ../ [ r ' J --I GT I __ I - 4 r'---;-) i , ,..._ . i4 , !!! I I I( E� El I 1 J+ kP' 1 ' II Y"1 I�' li 611 - N, ill hv7 1E5753a'a Q•I N� ryh,,L `, '�M `l •Jr�`��+ . -'L'Sa_o_ ., ! I I r - - - - - - �,,�W� lit _ ,,,_ ii'- iiiI' e 11 lE f Ei Il lr E! 1 ' � "4 f •.... I I - '21 I'IE _ RGaa,. .. o ti a • uI I f- II 1 � py� -aII l las 5 1 J .-- h l 104�J. IPA II eyl �' il LI � t _ I, 'O p . y 6g to.X. � ..• !'' I I ( `� �114, 9` _` ',1 +0!." ..sk.;,� ' - Ir i III i;1 = i e ' ti -0�- 11r 11 a I' 4-.-,n 1 1 I,1 e T _ d ad Iiiii:„.. I °_ III a` I, II I �•11� II • \V A\ '.. Z'' 1 1 t I- 11 n, .".,-' �� a 0 ,1� 1 f 1 Dn C'^ is_ J �� �a l , ( j 1 I I 0 s _ — .. : I I I itS I I' I I I I I _ I— v I _ I l l. ,;. 4 A• I I I RI 9 I I I I I I I I I I I I O A T I I I I 13 I -13 I I I UK I .m I I I I 8 6 m 1 W I I IE I I I I i.Se;•1 <P I I DOGAN_ 1 Z f G.W.W:. ' :R t Z t i_{I t '�., ...,snag YGGER.RUGON i4 71 1.. 4/1 ° d5d:( 6'VII RENTON HIGH SCHOOL We �.. ! 911P' r� SITE PLAN APPROVAL SET _ t ylg `Ii(� RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT f40S 1 C 1 `.`-+', RENTni.WASHINGTON INFO "" �•,' "`a IPm' , 1 1 I- 1 I 1 r^ I 7 I ' 1 NIIll ' 1 1 I s Rg MINI 8 Ili-,--_ 7 Si !!! 55aa 88 t €g�€gFg Y le I /� , A S6� n " 8M §�a_ p °qt ata� i!��e88tl"5'S�f888° p� �, n 711 111111iiiiill ' rIll # !'"1e ia!!a III i ; its` il I„•, , id i if' bil P� aEg ii!I lir!' f _ - - — � 11 Ij _�I_ 1 `i1 I. )1 ii. I', q ,1 i i k- N. II T ) (A Ili . pi , ' __ I I t 0 a . - -- - -= -la w� f _,- - - _ - -gig- 7 --- M 16— _ I ; =-�_, _ II �d°I .1' - . ® Y . f f) g bra -- - --- -- T: .) i)lir.i, -, . - ,.. I il i f 1 ■� 1� I� - 4 411mum11. 5� I i,Ii :moo\ III I ti � ,,.� .•::::::•:•:::::.:+ii.:•:::•::.• 4)1 t h,# . la —-- — 1 (- Ei � �� `- , # �4�'�" 4 V IU ��c _ 1 I;I \ 7Plits Il , `"% I j m 6'.= 1 bf-,€) ill N 0 - ;-, , 1::::: €c Ii ... `i 6 1 I • I 1111 I I IIP. ::,...;;;.:::c•:4 i-ki l 1 _ I HI �i J i __7. I . 11 i g! \ L J I I ,i,' l'i f , •••• 1 i r- ;4‘%! ' :(/) 0.1 a IIT a 1 - --,--�:� -- ,ate-- =r r---"— -IT—mewl—c. .n0 f II N 1 I I ii I1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I II 1 —I I M S I I I 1 I Nxa m I I ' .. �� I r; 0 § L-—IMA 14 AVE---0-: --- Z l Fr eN A. > •e E-4 1 ,�_. NwN s�Noa 400cRNizA.�oN A 1 D S ° d�S1 �1I Ifs, RENTON HIGH SCHOOL We ! SITE PLAN APPROVAL SET i£s pp i t§a. QI�(� RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT,M103 Y • �'l y iix tw A ,^".-, RENTON WASHINGTON INFO r•'n �•�•im�m�u REVISIONS II I n� u: ell In I!,,i l'II I11 I.11111 • u no in in n NIEN BM ■ ■ • • • II 4.---17i,`,4- , , lj E, — — . No . I -_®— MI- ... �... � . '� iiii BB �I. 0000 0000,0000 u -1°ERHE.000000°0 —0000— - - - - __- 0000 - - OEAST ELEVATION Scale: I/S'.1'-0' r.r.— IIIflllll' I-ilXgl!!I'�Illllr� n. s I111 1 "0 0l* oi- ha'l '_-� o" .- . ems _ • �� 0 IC = CON • ■ —i- 6 �L!J_! - - - ,t 0O z u _ _ram ■>•I■>• z ® -. L MIN . y 2 4z3.�, ill 8 Z urarr�r zvid.trr rri JT\_ 5 Ili 5 ¢ 6 0000 0000 C ,F.Ic4 ®00000000l I O �..2 EAST ELEVATION r���%�' Scale: /e'-r-o' MATERIALS LEGEND rw.P-980.2� EIFV-a IS �y". ..eau camiaw WU,90. !�y _T_•17P Eo CJO D.rt 8-16-99 A . ELEVATIONS 4 .._,Mot,,.-.,._ SCALE:vS.-V-Ir REVISIONS e Al nCllaal 1.I IliEl III. I. ,_ .. III MM•••I I 171 -- iri _ 1 1 ElI1I III I ' IS IH a '; wl= E °I= _1= as111. . ,... „_ OWEST COURTYARD ELEVATION tLYOt sod.: 1/a•-1'-0• t R4.o„4,1[ ,„i,1 .ib1t" e u-,0- I - —I .. I rwnwu>E I , "ZITa A / V 5 II�--Ir' .. �. • O l • • Emu:: 1i " ::a::s..—. .: : -. ..... .a M .3II s: 11 all II• II - o yam, �� i is s €asaIl•:::a;; ....sail:::Na: sie s =•a: s t., i o :: .. } ii ,, =•=m i� F 2 �� s: II sill.. ... eee s.:: sill imsoi easIlss:E _ C7 0 ; - ■ms Mil igloo O21 M'1.�1 $N Ea �1� _ o O z 3 ME MI e r11 ' I l ( iPI- 1 8Zww 5 W= :�� . L i CE cr H _ —L- 1 OEAST COURTYARD ELEVATION Sock 1/a•..1.-0. MATERIALS LEGEND 7 rurnm al.asa hN 2-99092 ASH 1� 1 coma..IE1lV zwo I AIR�WO uron [ASTMS MAMMALS •-16-99 • sl CM E.TEPILISED ASPHALT.00,104 PATH. 0 -,.,o A ELEVATIONS 5 SCALE I/S•-C-0• REVISIONS 9.-N-Y 05i.Y-C L , :'. TOW . 41, i I _ { I ii 1 �r • �: ::: :1S1:11 1MI1M1EM1M1MIM V - V - - V 'T iN 11 if t I -- •d,, • O WEST ELEVATION „Vo' r III ii I + e ®� o : >EXTIVUSE 1I a _¢ I IIII I i rt rt r� U F IE n / 77 A f • Z /I V I V 1 V IL—I HIr "�• I Y �.-_ f `� _• 0 o 7717 . � Ii 1 n „I I III _ „1 „1 . , =• o= 3 si il N on aimon • NNE g --------.. ---=E E --=-- E ,__. , _. _ _ . ,....... _ .._ _ _._ _ ____ _ .1 _ _ _ ___ _ _ __, ______ _ . 1 .. . . ,___...-- -r-,L,-. . ,_ _. , T.\/-,2 MATERIALS LEGEND NOS SEAR SAW OWEST ELEVATION _ �i>mi«, „ 2 x9t t/e -t'-o 51..9440.ao ..m NO 2-98092 riLE ELEV-8 .a Ou 1 CVw1W61E0 SAL SRO ORA. AIR U J9 ,1301 c.a 8-16-99 a1u9t9 DIVING uArzmNs ,,.1F.1 R ASP.?RCO5.9 9.,M. 9 .64.5p A ELEVATIONS 6 ---•,••,•,• SCALE yM-r-0• * eECT1ON 18.'MP 23 N,ROE 5 E•WM. .evarows Call before you Dig if-eoo z;aza-ssss ��r_�, W Foe —- -—s ragraa-_ i y zi /11 r II , '^ _NISIIIS ._ r ' Er gll r , m 1 II_ ecc 1 3 ,..,0,,, RPM I a COO.IND) Pk mnw r 1• SR 031 RAS FOR WOW.01 Of ad gym, : I, 1:9 WV Of li irill i e^'-1.-— ' —1. u.,ten, �--}( // -__I \.. Fe N W f vsrw .0 a �AI O 9 Vme vfeece912C, '/ , W $ ,, ..1111111, a• i Ii i rwm�.a' _� tiri ��s.nwn \ , `.� 1 • M of x�M4common come.p / a� _ . ` W 3nvn 5 4 GailmitYWarri OIL II 111W 1 �_ 411 , 0. z YBOB3 __ .. .. ice . v _ s� _ — sue _ A . � .—C1.3 REVISION. .�. 2 "=.:::::-.L.1... 0 1 3 f wTATAIc a iNMI a� xwwi�o-mmwmaman rm l 4� T Imfi7PI .WIWIFSIW CIF I mISI _ .....00 : - 4_. 1 r �j . , 11I , I 3.1 III ONORTH ELEVATION Sede: 1/8•-1.-0- w . - .rMus (,) 1 ` a .. .I• air.. • 0 J# F 1 I;,li� 1Ilu'�I,aC1l�,I JIIII1 11 hil,l [liii ii/ .o CD N H Had--,i 1 � � E � E o =Iu,—:r., 1_ i865z.±f. == o [1 .--.i,,, �� ; ® Got ; 0 r - N Z W �y 00 T �4, 00 U --L • - ONORTH ELEVATION Y MATERIALS LEGEND , "p1,,,,W :,VOMID-ea ..-+,o.nan • b.z-aaoaz' nu iv-3 111111111E111 m .,��.K ¢ w AIR CHECKED e-la-aa 01871.0 WV.. IMCit.,o„m WNW.OMA ..,,. >_C.,,,W A ELEVATION. 3 >-...n.c...,..,. SCALE,,.•-T'• REVISIONS ` • I IE). ,• rainiCAOF ill XLII■I rt.ravy O r y a .e 1 1 v II rd li -- a _ti at __IL II 11 li. no :::: , IME in: , lip n. gma;gai 1 _ ,n n, ne • �f� e1e eee e•e ® �A� T ® ® ^� V f RENTON HI6N SCHOOL IA r F__ 1l1 111 III moil;; 11 ... 1�1 .. L. 11111 H. IN ,,, Ill 10 111 III ��� ��� _ �. .. ._ fir .... 8 riilliAi 8 •IaIN _ �I�I� — — 8 I1 g SEE EEi is• ■N0000 00 00 00 00 r, 1 ❑O00 _ 000000 0❑00 ❑. � �-_-_- ..f e �--�- �rT' . >.6 — _00 on on no. 1..... .Y t' Mbl l :_ . • • \ 1I OSOUTH ELEVATION Scale: 1/8•-r-0 Cn ri :_.li4.NL+afi xar •Y epea. -.. _—_.. Iji a y • i '1 IIM ME MO II woe ' TT ®" II 0HL i _,.... ___ illo00l00 , _ ll ____, —1 II F00oor_ I l ' 1 PAX „ SALVAGED IA.COTA OSOUTH ELEVATION MATERIALS LEGEND E2,911E Swill IN I'-0• µlint)vn,MAC i s*u.wm IMP ...,m cwart NO 2-9 092 V FILZ 0EV-I e.e ou 1III�II�I��II1I�III1I M..G..,fD i(i.E.a.. 7 i D GIR PC.STUCCO [AWING WIIERVLS ,E.,, . a,a �..e ._p. A �� ELEVATIONS 1 .�....-•o.-....+a SCALE 1/S'-1'-0' MAR. 20. 2000 12:25PM P 2 FROM : LJE I SMAN DESIGN P: T1NE NO. 206 3221799 -.i,; �:'s�r a asi. ■I sigh • ,•7 H U1V 1 rvr,rB Landscape Architecture Slre Planning Developmental Planning March 17, 2000 Mr. Jack Connell Project Manager Renton School District 1220 North 4th Street Renton, WA 98055 RE: Recommendation for Redwood Trees NAC#2-98092-3Aa Dear Jack, Pursuant to the request of Peter Rosen, the Senior Planner, the Architect has asked me to evaluate the reasons why we have elected to remove the redwood trees at the main entry rather than leave them or trim them back to a proportionate size. It is clear these trees have overgrown their intended size relative to their proximity to the building, and will only continue to get larger in time, conceivably 30'taller and 20'wider. These trees now have exceeded the height of the building and are pressing against the facade, Left unattended they will eventually grow together and completely cover this important building entrance and block out classroom light. The architect has asked our opinion as to whether we can trim the trees to enable construction activity and long term maintenance to occur on the masonry and windows of the building . This is not recommended, for a number of reasons, the first being the amount of trimming required to provide adequate building clearance would give the trees an unnatural appearance and greatly reduce their aesthetic value. Secondly, the severity of pruning required would increase the risk of infestations of pests or diseases. This hard pruning would also be required on a semi-annual basis as the trees try to regain their natural form. This repeated pruning would further increase the trees susceptibility to health problems. The root systems of these trees are also at risk of damage. This is supported by site evidence, showing that these trees are putting underground forces on the existing foundations of the stairs and building. This could cause both structural damage to the building and damage to the health of the tree. There is also trenching required for the new Fire Protection Service lines and riser in very close proximity to the eastern tree. Finally, the actual construction required for the building in the immediate location of the trees could cause them serious harm. Spillage and slop from re-tucking the bricks and the cleaning and sealing of the building could damage the trees. Since you noted the taxpayers have voted the bond money to extend the life of this facility for 40 to 50 years, its would be most appropriate at this time to replace these trees with a relatively mature species at a distance from the building that will not provide these conflicts in the future. We feel we have done that with our landscape plan, providing the same classic columnar entry experience the original architect had intended, using similar, if not exactly, the same species and variety of tree existing. wo A REC 11ED Sincere .1e0 MAR 2 0 2000 Nick Hagan Landscape Architect BUILDING DIVISION cc: Guy Overman, NAG Greg Stack,NAG N:\2-98092\3\A\3Aa-TreeAnalysis 000317 February 21, 2000 Renton City Council Minutes Page 55 month for juvenile intervention hearings. Mr. McGuire added that the court has also modified its processing of parking infractions. These are now tied to the state's Judicial Information System,which enables the court to process payments more quickly and better follow up on delinquencies. Mr.McGuire expected this change to result in increased compliance with parking regulations in Renton. Mr.McGuire then described several projects which the court will undertake in 2000,including a warrant reduction project,an update of the jury management system, and a review of the processes used to collect delinquent fines. He concluded that Renton's Municipal Court judges each hear an average of over 9,800 cases annually,while King County District Court judges average only 7,500. Responding to Councilmembers Persson and Keolker-Wheeler,Judge Jurado agreed that the problem of having to provide interpreters for defendants,as noted by Mr.McGuire,is likely to continue in the future. The judge added that another complication arises when the court mandates counseling or other services for a non-English speaking defendant, since various statutes and case law have determined that in such situations,the court mandating the treatment must also provide any interpreter services needed to conduct the counseling. APPEAL Planning&Development Committee Chair Keolker-Wheeler presented a report Planning&Development regarding the Renton High School Modernization appeal. The Committee Committee convened on February 17,2000,to consider the appeal by the Renton School Appeal: Renton High School District of the Hearing Examiner's decision dated 11/18/99. Modernization The appellant operates Renton High School, located at 400 South Second Street. The subject project would modernize Renton High School and add an approximately 16,500 square foot building on the site. The new building would be the locus of a new performing arts center. The proposal also requires the approval of two variances. The Hearing Examiner approved the project,with three conditions,only one of which is on appeal: that the applicant eliminate the proposed parking area in front of the arts center addition facing South 2nd. The Committee found that the school district is attempting,by this request, to separate the parking for visitors from the parking lot for students and teachers for security reasons and to accommodate disabled persons. School security is of considerable importance to the Committee,especially in these times of violence in the schools. The Committee found that the Hearing Examiner committed a substantial error of law in applying the variance criteria to this"area variance." Because this is an area variance,the burden to prove hardship is less stringent than that imposed by the Examiner. Additionally,the Committee found that the proposed location for visitor parking is the minimum necessary to accomplish the goal of the school district to facilitate security and accommodate disabled parking. The Committee recommended that the City Council reverse the Hearing Examiner's decision relating to the condition to remove the small parking area to the south of the new arts center,and uphold the decision in all other respects. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY SCHLITZER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. ADMINISTRATIVE Chief Administrative Officer Jay Covington reviewed a written administrative REPORT report summarizing the City's recent progress towards goals and work APPROV:!) BY CITY COUNCIL PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Cate—2 COMMITTEE REPORT February 21, 2000 Renton High School Modernization Appeal File No.#LUA-99-120,SA-H,V-H (Referred December 13, 1999) The Committee convened on February 17,2000, to consider the appeal by the Renton School District of the Hearing Examiner's decision dated 11/18/99. The Appellant operates Renton High School, located at 400 South Second Street. The subject project would modernize Renton High School and add an approximately 16,500-sq. foot building on the site. The new building would be the locus of a new performing arts center. The proposal also requires the approval of two variances. The Hearing Examiner approved the project,with three conditions, only one of which is on appeal: that the applicant eliminate the proposed parking area in front of the arts center addition facing South 2na The Committee finds that the school district is attempting,by this request, to separate the parking for visitors from the parking for students and teachers for security reasons and to accommodate disabled persons. School security is of considerable importance to the Committee, especially in these times of violence in the schools. The Committee finds that the Hearing Examiner committed a substantial error of law in applying the variance criteria to this"area variance." Because this is an area variance, the burden to prove hardship is less stringent than that imposed by the examiner. Additionally,the Committee finds that the proposed location for visitor parking is the minimum necessary to accomplish the goal of the school district to facilitate security and accommodate disabled parking. The Committee recommends the City Council reverse the Hearing Examiner's decision relating to the condition to remove the small parking area to the south of the new arts center and uphold the decision in all other respects. ettthi (A)k/212/2„ Kathy K- ker-Wheeler, Chair Timothy J. Schr e ice-Ch it Dan Clawson,Member RUU-44- U3.1 7AM rrtum rtcn i nn J1!1VV V I J I , ,.n1 II., J .-- -- - • - Post-lt"Fax Note 76'' loae'c -9/ peg°es i -tom e T ( o./Oeptt J , Co. e'/ Phone w p / Phor eg,eZ5 r + ',/—41'71--7:l F�#�D6''ilf`�l. 7 1 7 P IAj�✓N Y�f 771 7K/ 2 • 18d57_, -- 4,G4 NOTICE OF DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Renton School District No. 403 issued a determination of nonsignificance (DNS) under the State Environmental Policy Act Rules (Chapter 197-11 WAC) for the selected demolition. restoration, reconfiguration, and modernization of Renton High School proposed by Renton School District No. 403. After review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the agency, Renton School District No. 403 has determined this proposal will not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. Copies of the DNS and Environmental Checklist are available at no charge from Renton School District No, 403, 1220 North 4th.treet, Renton, WA 98055. The public is invited to comment on this DNS by submitting written comments no later than September 15, 1999 to Rick Stracke at the above address. • MAR 2 0 2000 BUILDING DIVISION SEP-14-1999 16:55 CITY f HENIUN Pbr 4eD ' ( 41 • CIT' OF RENTON Planning/Buiiwng/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator September 14, 1999 Mr. Jack Connell Renton School District—Capital Projects Office 1220 North 4th Street Renton, WA 98055 SUBJECT: RHS PERFORMING ARTS CENTER—DETERMINATION OF NON- SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) Dear Mr. Connell: The City of Renton appreciates the opportunity to comment on the Determination of Non- Significance issued by the Renton School District for the proposed Performing Arts Center at Renton High School. We would like to offer the following comments at this time. The proposed project would result in the demolition of the 48-foot high smokestack topped with' a lightning rod. Presently these features are considered to be obstructions at the south end of the airport. The top of the smokestack is 134 feet above sea level,which is 105 feet above the airport elevation. The removal of the stack is considered to be beneficial and would increase safety for aircraft arriving to or departing from the Renton Municipal Airport. A departure runway safety area extends southward 1,000 feet from the south end of the runway. This safety area extends southward and upward from the runway end at a slope of 20:1. Any proposed construction should not extend above the slope of the safety area.Additional information regarding the safety area may be obtained by contacting Gail Reed,Airport Manager at(425)235-2591. The City of Renton requires Fire Mitigation Fees and Transportation Mitigation Fees for new development, and these fees are applied through the SEPA environmental review process. With regard to the Fire Mitigation Fee, credit is given for the existing building area to be demolished. No Fire Mitigation Fee will be requested, since the area to be demolished exceeds the area of new construction. In addition,the Transportation Mitigation,Fee will not be requested, as the proposal would result in fewer seats than in the existing auditorium, and less building area. Separate land use permits are required by the City of Renton. Application has been made to the Development Services Division for Site Plan Review. A public hearing has been tentatively scheduled for October 19, 1999 before the City's Hearing Examiner. Peter Rosen is the project manager for the land use permits. He can be reached at(425)430-7219. C A1FMPIGZIFi 13DN3.D0C1.1�'f 105'5 South Grady Way-Renton. Washinatnn 9R(15 SEP-14-1999 16:55 CITY OF RENTON PBPN 425 4i1 (241 r.e3 September 14, 1999 Page 2 We look forward to continuing our work with you in this proposal. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the environmental determination for the Performing Arts Center. Sincerely, 7C 43/ Gregg Zimme an,Administrator Planing/Building/Public Works Department CC: Jana Hanson Peter Rosen Jennifer Toth Henning C:\TEM P\OZRHSANS.DOCVnj f r �• rioa, RE ON SCHOOL DISTRICT # 403 Z2�'p 300 S.W. 7th STREET PURCHASE ORDER NO. _ RENTON, WA 98055 CP000128 . .,.�_ 403 Purchasing 425 204-2250 FAX 425 204-2258 Accounting 425 204-2395 FAX 425 204-2383 Ship to: Vendor: FACILITIES AND PLANNING SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT #403 PO BOX 130 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING 1220 NORTH 4TH STREET KENT, WA 98035-0130 CITY OI=RENTON RENTON, WA 98055 MAR '; 4 2000 Mark for: RHS, 009 , WO 84985 Vlail Invoice in Duplicate to: RECEIVED ATTENTION: It is understood that the Vendor assures compliance with Slate and �v-- Federal guidelines and regulations regarding non-discrimination against any RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT employee/student on the basis of race,color,national origin,sex,or handicap in ATTN ACCOUNTS PAYABLE recruitment,hiring,placement,assignment of tasks,hours of employment,levels of 300 SW 7TH STREET responsibility and pay. Harassment of any employee/student with regard to race, color,national origin,sex or handicap is strictly prohibited. DATE: 02/28/00 VENDOR NO. 602192 Page 1 of 1 REQ. NO. C000139 ITEM NO QUANTITY UNIT DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE EXTENSION )001 300 EACH Please run this advertisement in your 1 . 00 300 . 00 issues of March 8 & 15 , 2000 and mail affidavit of publication to : Rick Stracke Executive Director, Facilities & Operations Renton School District No . 403 1220 North 4th Street Renton, WA 98055 RENTON HIGH-NOTICE OF ACTION SUB TOTAL 300 . 00 NO EXPRESS OR FREIGHT COLLECT SHIPMENTS ACCEPTED. SALES TAX 0 . 00 NOTICE TO VENDORS: As a part of this contract of sale between Renton School District PO TOTAL 300 . 00 and the Vendor,it is specifically agreed that payment for all goods and services satisfactorily rendered shall be mailed to the Vendor or made available to the Vendor RENTON CH STRICT#403 within sixty(60)days of receipt of goods and services or properly completed invoice, whichever is later. The Renton School District requires MSDS(Material Safety Data Sheets)be included terials Manager with all applicable items purchased. Date , RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 403 NOTICE OF ACTION Renton High School Modernization Project Notice is given under SEPA, RCW 43.21C.080, that the Renton School District and the City of Renton took the actions described in (2) below on the dates indicated in (2) below: 1. Any action to set aside, enjoin, review, or otherwise challenge such action on the grounds of noncompliance with the provisions of Chapter 43.21C RCW (Washington State Environmental Policy Act) shall be commenced on or before April 5, 2000. 2. Description of agency actions: a. SEPA Determination of Nonsignificance by Renton School District — August 27, 1999 b. Notice of Application by City of Renton — September 2, 1999 c. Notice of Application (Revised) by City of Renton— October 8, 1999 d. Site Plan Approval by City of Renton Hearing Examiner—November 18, 1999 e. Setback Variance Approval by City of Renton Hearing Examiner— November 18, 1999 f. Landscaping Variance Approval by City of Renton Hearing Examiner— November 18, 1999 g. Setback Variance Condition Appeal (parking area on North 2nd Street restored) granted by Renton City Council—February 21, 2000 3. Description of proposal: The existing Renton High School will be modernized to accommodate current curriculum needs and activities. The existing east wing will be demolished and replaced with a new Performing Arts Center, consisting of 16,500 square feet of floor area. Vehicular circulation and building access, including a new student parking lot and a visitor parking lot, will be reconfigured to improve building security and personal safety. [32012-0806/SB003683333.DOC] -1- 3/2/00 4. Location of proposal: Renton High School 400 South 2nd Street Renton, WA 98055 5. Type of environmental review under SEPA : a. Environmental Checklist —August 9, 1999 b. Determination of Nonsignificance —August 27, 1999 6. Documents may be examined during regular business hours at: City of Renton Development Services Division Renton City Hall, 6th Floor 1055 South Grady Way Renton, Wa 98055 7. Name of agency, proponent, or applicant giving notice: Renton School District No. 403 Capital Projects Office 1220 North 4ch Street Renton, WA 98055 8. • otice is filed by: ck Stracke Date xecutive Director Capital Projects Office Renton School District No. 403 (32012-0806/SB003683333.DOC] -2- 3/2/00 j AIRPORT WAY / I S. TILLCUY SRiEET _�- 1 L S. TOO STREET rIIw v r�is ,imt:43 ' , ,,loT � NON O LLIO r v t t I N • d Wd013/130 ' ' f, ` tt0,40.3!g .t,,,, .,.. ` i 1 1 u l, } iis , ,t., r ". y ., I '. ryy , �jL+�y 4 LjLdL • l S. SCOq STREET � I i r S. THIRD STREET * \ t # � 15l I I RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 403 NOTICE OF ACTION Renton High School Modernization Project Notice is given under SEPA, RCW 43.21C.080, that the Renton School District and the City of Renton took the actions described in (2)below on the dates indicated in (2)below: I. Any action to set aside, enjoin, review, or otherwise challenge such action on the grounds of noncompliance with the provisions of Chapter 43.2IC RCW (Washington State Environmental Policy Act) shall be commenced on or before April 5, 2000. 2. Description of agency actions: a. SEPA Determination of Nonsignificance by Renton School District—August 27, 1999 b. Notice of Application by City of Renton—September 2, 1999 c. Notice of Application(Revised)by City of Renton—October 8, 1999 d. Site Plan Approval by City of Renton I learing Examiner—November 18, 1999 c...r_.,,,L V...:.,..,.a Annnwni by City of Renton 1learine Examiner—November 18, 1999 Federal Aviation Administration AERONAUTICAL STUDY NORTHWEST MOUNTAIN REGION, ANM-520 No: 99-ANM-2083-OE 1601 LIND AVENUE, S .W. RENTON, WA 98055-4056 ISSUED DATE : 02/25/00 1A3 Z P JACK CONNELL 09 20 RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 403 1220 NORTH 4TH STREET RENTON, WA 98055 ** DETERMINATION OF NO HAZARD TO AIR NAVIGATION ** The Federal Aviation Administration has completed an aeronautical study under the provisions of 49 U. S .C. , Section 44718 and, if applicable, Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations, part 77 , concerning: Description: BUILDING RENTON HIGH SCHOOL Location: RENTON WA MAR 2 0 2000 Latitude : 47-28-54 . 00 NAD 83 Longitude : 122-12-41 . 00 Heights : 71 feet above ground level (AGL) BUILDING DIVISION 91 feet above mean sea level (AMSL) This aeronautical study revealed that the structure does not exceed obstruction standards and would not be a hazard to air navigation provided the following condition (s) , if any, is (are) met : Based on this evaluation, marking and lighting are not necessary for aviation safety. However, if marking and/or lighting are accomplished on a voluntary basis, we recommend it be installed and maintained in accordance with FAA Advisory Circular 70/7460-1J. This determination is based, in part, on the foregoing description which includes specific coordinates, heights, frequency (ies) and power. Any changes in coordinates, heights, frequency (ies) or use of greater power will void this determination. Any future construction or alteration, including increase in heights, power, or the addition of other transmitters, requires separate notice to the FAA. This determination does include temporary construction equipment such as cranes, derricks, etc . , which may be used during actual construction of the structure . However, this equipment shall not exceed the overall heights as indicated above . Equipment which has a height greater than the studied structure requires separate notice to the FAA. This determination concerns the effect of this structure on the safe and efficient use of navigable airspace by aircraft and does not relieve the sponsor of compliance responsibilities relating to any law, ordinance, or regulation of any Federal, State, or local government body. A copy of this determination will be forwarded to the Federal Communications d 1� C 'S -)F RENTON miLL MIMP �`✓N4City Clerk Jesse Tanner,Mayor Marilyn J. Petersen February 23, 2000 Mr. Richard E. McCann Perkins Coie LLP 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4800 Seattle, WA 98101-3099 Re: Renton High School Modernization Appeal; File No. LUA-99-120, SA-H, V-H Dear Mr. McCann: At the regular Council meeting of February 21, 2000, the Renton City Council adopted the recommendation of the Planning and Development Committee recommending that the hearing examiner's decision be reversed relating to the condition to remove the small parking area to the south of the new arts center. In all other respects, the hearing examiner's decision was upheld on the referenced matter. A copy of the Planning and Development Committee report is enclosed for your records. If I can provide additional information or assistance,please feel free to contact this office. Sincerely, Marily . ersen City Clerk/Cable Manager cc: Mayor Jesse Tanner Council President Randy Corman Peter Rosen, Development Services Division Fred Kaufman, Hearing Examiner 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 - (425)430-6510 /FAX(425)430-6516 ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer • APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Date g COMMITTEE REPORT February 21, 2000 Renton High School Modernization Appeal File No.#LUA-99-120,SA-H,V-H (Referred December 13, 1999) The Committee convened on February 17,2000,to consider the appeal by the Renton School District of the Hearing Examiner's decision dated 11/18/99. The Appellant operates Renton High School,located at 400 South Second Street. The subject project would modernize Renton High School and add an approximately 16,500-sq. foot building on the site. The new building would be the locus of a new performing arts center. The proposal also requires the approval of two variances. The Hearing Examiner approved the project, with three conditions, only one of which is on appeal: that the applicant eliminate the proposed parking area in front of the arts center addition facing South 2nd. The Committee finds that the school district is attempting,by this request, to separate the parking for visitors from the parking for students and teachers for security reasons and to accommodate disabled persons. School security is of considerable importance to the Committee, especially in these times of violence in the schools. The Committee finds that the Hearing Examiner committed a substantial error of law in applying the variance criteria to this "area variance." Because this is an area variance, the burden to prove hardship is less stringent than that imposed by the examiner. Additionally,the Committee finds that the proposed location for visitor parking is the minimum necessary to accomplish the goal of the school district to facilitate security and accommodate disabled parking. The Committee recommends the City Council reverse the Hearing Examiner's decision relating to the condition to remove the small parking area to the south of the new arts center and uphold the decision in all other respects. / 6441 — 1 Kathy K- ker-Wheeler, Chair v Timothy J. Schl. e ice-Ch it Dan Clawson, Member • December 13, 1999 Renton City Council Minutes Page 439 Councilman Edwards added that while Renton had already pledged to revisit this subject next year,in the meantime I-695 was approved which has greatly complicated matters. He noted that the question remains as to which population of voters would vote on a proposed increase in ISD impact fees which would affect only a small portion of Renton residents. City Attorney Lawrence J.Warren concurred that the answer to this question is yet to be determined. Citizen Comment: Wilcock— Everett Wilcock, 11831 — 164`h Ave. SE,Renton, said that Renton should not Issaquah School District be able to allow growth without ensuring that the necessary infrastructure is Impact Fees financially provided for. He said the impact fee adopted by Renton is not sufficient to meet ISD's six-year capital facilities plan, although Renton adopted this plan by reference in its own Comprehensive Plan. City Attorney Warren explained that although this is true,according to the Growth Management Act the only program which requires concurrency between jurisdictions is transportation planning. He added that the subject of school capital needs and how these are planned for could be taken up as an inter-governmental rather than a concurrency issue. Councilman Schlitzer spoke to the problem of boundary conflicts between the Issaquah and Renton school districts,which differs from the boundary between the cities of Renton and Issaquah. Saying that Renton School District has indicated that it does not cost$18,000 to ensure school capacity for each single family dwelling,he emphasized that Renton is able to handle its growth without imposing any school impact fees at all. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. At Councilman Edwards' request, item 7.d. was removed for separate consideration. Appeal: RPI Retail Building at City Clerk reported appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision affirming the Renton Center,Ted Abernethy ERC's approval of the site plan for the RPI retail building at Renton Center; (SA-99-082) appeal filed on 11/29/99 by Matthew D. O'Conner,representing Ted Abernethy (SA-99-082). Refer to Planning&Development Committee. Appeal: Renton High School City Clerk reported appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding the site Modernization(Site Plan and plan and variance application for the modernization of Renton High School; Variance),Renton School appeal filed on 12/02/99 by Richard E.McCann and Wayt T. Watterson, District(SA-99-120) representing Renton School District(SA-99-120). Refer to Planning& Development Committee. City Clerk: 1999 General City Clerk submitted the 1999 General Election canvass results from King Election Canvass Results County Records&Elections,as follows: Mayor,Jesse Tanner(8,340- elected); Council Position No. 3,Kathy Keolker-Wheeler(7,875 -elected); Council Position No.4,King Parker(8,175 -elected); Council Position No. 5, Toni Nelson(5,287-elected)and Heidi Carlson(4,567); Council Position No. 7,Dan Clawson(4,403)and Don Persson(5,289 -elected). Information. CAG: 99-068, SW 27th St Surface Water Utility Division submitted CAG-99-068, SW 27th St. Culvert Culvert Replacement, Replacement; and recommended approval of the project, authorization for final Scoccolo Const pay estimate in the amount of$4,817.40,commencement of 60-day lien period, and release of retained amount of$29,593.20 to Scoccolo Construction, Inc., contractor, if all required releases are obtained. Council concur. Comprehensive Plan: Transportation Systems Division recommended review of updates to the Transportation Element Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan. Refer to Transportation Updates Committee. CIT} t,F RENTON COUNCIL AGEivA BILL Al#: .b . SUBMITTING DATA: FOR AGENDA OF: 12/13/99 Dept/DivBoard....City Clerk Staff Contact Marilyn Petersen AGENDA STATUS: Consent XX SUBJECT: Public Hearing Appeal of Hearing Examiner's Decision regarding Site Plan Ordinance &Variance Application for the Modernization of Renton Resolution High School. File No. LUA-99-120,SA-H,V-H Old Business EXHIBITS: New Business A. City Clerk's letter Study Session B. Appeal(12/02/99) Other C. Hearing Examiner's Report&Decision(11/18/99) RECOMMENDED ACTION: APPROVALS: Refer to Planning and Development Committee. Legal Dept Finance Dept Other FISCAL IMPACT: N/A Expenditure Required Transfer/Amendment.... Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated SUMMARY OF ACTION: Appeal filed by Richard E. McCann and Wayt T. Watterson of Perkins Coie LLP,representing Renton School District, accompanied by required fee received on 12/02/99. CIT1 DF RENTON City Clerk Jesse Tanner,Mayor Marilyn J.Petersen December 7, 1999 APPEAL FILED BY: Renton School District Representative: Richard E. McCann and Wayt T. Watterson of Perkins Coie LLP RE: Appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision dated 11/18/99 regarding the Site Plan and Variance Application for the Modernization of Renton High School located at 400 S 2nd Street. File No. LUA-99-120, SA-H, V-H. To Parties of Record: Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Renton City Code of Ordinances, written appeal of the hearing examiner's decision regarding the site plan and variance application of the above referenced site has been filed with the City Clerk. In accordance with Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110F, within five days of receipt of the notice of appeal, the City Clerk shall notify all parties of record of the receipt of the appeal. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the written appeals and other pertinent documents will be reviewed by the Council's Planning and Development Committee. The Council secretary will notify all parties of record of the date and time of the Planning and Development Committee meeting. The recommendation of the Committee will be presented for consideration by the full Council at a subsequent Council meeting. Attached is a copy of the Renton Municipal Code regarding appeals of hearing examiner decisions or recommendations. Please note that the City Council will be considering the merits of the appeal based upon the written record previously established. Unless a showing can be made that additional evidence could not reasonably have been available at the prior hearing held by the Hearing Examiner, no further evidence or testimony on this matter will be accepted by the City Council. For additional information or assistance,please feel free to call me at (425) 430-6502. Sincerely, Marilyn J. Pe sen, CMC City Clerk Attachment 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 - (425)430-6510 /FAX(425)430-6516 ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer City of Renton Municipal le:Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 110-A als 4-8-110C3 Any appeal shall be filed in writing. The written notice of appeal shall fully, clearly and thoroughly specify the substantial error(s) in fact or law which exist in the record of the proceedings from which the appellant seeks relief. (Ord. 4353, 6-1-92) 4-8-110C4 The notice of appeal shall be accompanied by a fee in accordance with RMC 4-1-170, the fee schedule of the City. (Ord. 3658, 9-13-82) 4-8-110E8 Unless an ordinance providing for review of decision of the Examiner requires review thereof by the Superior Court,any interested party aggrieved by the Examiner's written decision or recommendation may submit a notice of appeal to the City Clerk upon a form furnished by the City Clerk, within fourteen (14) calendar days from the date of the Examiner's written report. (Ord. 3658, 9-13-82) 4-8-110F: Appeals to City Council - Procedures: 1. Notice to Parties of Record: Within five (5) days of receipt of the notice of appeal,the City Clerk shall notify all parties of record of the receipt of the appeal. 2. Opportunity to Provide Comments: Other parties of record may submit letters in support of their positions within ten (10) days of the dates of mailing of the notification of the filing of the notice of appeal. 3. Transmittal of Record to Council: Thereupon the Clerk shall forward to the members of the City Council all of the pertinent documents, including the written decision or recommendation, findings and conclusions contained in the Examiner's report,the notice of appeal, and additional letters submitted by the parties. (Ord. 3658, 9-13-82) 4. Council Review Procedures: No public hearing shall be held by the City Council. No new or additional evidence or testimony shall be accepted by the City Council unless a showing is made by the party offering the evidence that the evidence could not reasonably have been available at the time of the hearing before the Examiner. If the Council determines that additional evidence is required,the Council shall remand the matter to the Examiner for reconsideration and receipt of additional evidence. The cost of transcription of the hearing record shall be borne by the appellant. In the absence of any entry upon the record of an order by the City Council authorizing new or additional evidence or testimony, and a remand to the Hearing Examiner for receipt of such evidence or testimony, it shall be presumed that no new or additional evidence or testimony has been accepted by the City Council, and that the record before the City Council is identical to the hearing record before the Hearing Examiner. (Ord. 4389, 1-25-. 93) 5. Council Evaluation Criteria: The consideration by the City Council shall be based solely upon the record,the Hearing Examiner's report, the notice of appeal and additional submissions by parties. 6. Findings and Conclusions Required: If, upon appeal of a decision of the Hearing Examiner on an application submitted pursuant to Section RMC 4-1-050F1 and after examination of the record,the Council determines that a substantial error in fact or law exists in the record, it may remand the preceding to Examiner for reconsideration,or modify,or reverse the decision of the Examiner accordingly. 7. Council Action: If,upon appeal from a recommendation of the Hearing Examiner upon an application submitted pursuant to Section RMC 4-1-050F2 and F3, and after examination of the record,the Council determines that a substantial error in fact or law exists in the record, or that a recommendation of the Hearing Examiner should be disregarded or modified,the City Council may remand the proceeding to the Examiner for reconsideration, or enter its own decision upon the application. 8. Decision Documentation: In any event, the decision of the City Council shall be in writing and shall specify any modified or amended findings and conclusions other than those set forth in the report of the Hearing Examiner. Each material finding shall be supported by substantial evidence in the record. The burden of proof shall rest with the appellant. (Ord. 3658,9-13-82) 9. Council Action Final: The action of the Council approving, modifying or rejectirt, a decision of the Examiner shall be final and conclusive, unless appealed within the time frames uric6r subsection G5 of this Section. (Ord. 4660, 3-17-1997) PERKINS COIE LLP 1201 THIRD AVENUE, SUITE 4800•SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98101-3099 TELEPHONE: 206 583-8888• FACSIMILE: 206 583-8500 RIC'HARD E.McCANN CITY OF RENTON (206)583-8618 mccan@perkinscoie.com DEC 0 21999 RECEIVED December 2, 1999 CITY CLERK'S OFFICE oo P r" City Clerk City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Re: File No. LUA-99-120, SA-H, V-H Dear City Clerk: Attached is the Renton School District's Written Appeal of the Hearing Examiner's Decision to the Renton City Council on the above-referenced file. Also attached is the Renton School District's Memorandum in Support of Appeal from the Hearing Examiner's Decision and Request for Oral Argument. The required appeal fee of$75.00 is enclosed. Please acknowledge receipt of this Appeal with notice to all parties of record. Thank you for your attention. Very truly yours, Richard E. McCann REM:sab Enclosure cc: Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer Sue Carlson, Administrator, Economic Development, Neighborhoods, and Strategic Planning Betty Nokes, Economic Development Director Larry Warren, City Attorney [32012-0805/SB993360.016] ANCHORAGE BELLEVUE BOISE DENVER HONG KONG LOS ANGELES MENLO PARK OLYMPIA PORTLAND SAN FRANCISCO SEATTLE SPOKANE TAIPEI WASHINGTON, D.C. STRATEGIC ALLIANCE: RUSSELL&DuMOULIN, VANCOUVER, CANADA . CITY OF RENTON 4 DEC 0 2 1999 APPEAL RECEIVED CITY CLERK'S OFFICE HEARING EXAMINER WRITTEN APPEAL OF HEARING EXAMINER'S DECISION TO THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL FILE NO.: LUA-99-120, SA-H, V-H APPLICATION NAME: Renton High School Modernization Project The undersigned interested party hereby files its Notice of Appeal from the decision or recommendation of the Land Use Hearing Examiner, dated November 18, 1999. 1. IDENTIFICATION OF PARTY APPELLANT: REPRESENTATIVE (IF ANY): Name: Renton School District Name: Richard E. McCann Address: 1220 North 4th Street Wayt T. Watterson Renton, WA 98055 Address: Perkins Coie LLP 1201 Third Avenue, 48th Floor Seattle, WA 98101 Telephone: (425) 204-4475 Telephone: (206) 583-8888 2. SPECIFICATION OF ERRORS (Attach additional sheets, if necessary) Set forth below are the specific errors of law or fact upon which this appeal is based: CONCLUSIONS: (Please designate number as denoted in the Examiner's report) No. 12 Error: The Examiner's Conclusion that: "While the goal of serving the front entrance of the main building with parking is intended to encourage use of the front entrance and appears congenial, the front entry can serve students, teachers or parents who arrive on foot or via transit," is in error because it misses the fundamental School District objective in designing the small parking lot on the South 2°d Street side. The School District intends the small parking area as a key element in reconfiguring access to the high school buildings in the important interest of building security and personal safety for students and staff. All student ingress and egress is to be from the student parking lot to the north and east of the Performing Arts [32012-0805/SB993340.275] 12/2/99 Center. All teacher and staff access will be from the west parking areas. Parents and other visitors are to use the proposed small parking area and the main (tower) entrance. The School District has determined that only by separating access to the high school can security and safety be improved. The proposed small parking area eliminated by the Hearing Examiner is indispensable to that security and safety program. Correction: The Hearing Examiner's Conclusion on the function of the proposed small parking area should recognize what the School District is attempting to implement in the interest of building security and personal safety for the students and staff. The small parking area on the South 2"d Street side is indispensable to separating building access for students, teachers and staff, and parents and visitors. No. 12 Error: The Examiner's Conclusions that: "The proposed parking at the front of the arts center is inappropriate" and "contradicts and contravenes the spacious setting"; and "to . . . violate the spirit of the code and allow parking in this additional setback would be inappropriate." are apparently based upon the Examiner's conclusion that the code's intent was only to avoid "strip-style development"—even at the unique public facility of Renton High School—which is clearly erroneous. This small parking area on the South 2"d Street side will contain 12 spaces restricted at all times. This small parking area is not an emulation of"strip-style" commercial development parking that the City of Renton is admirably attempting to curtail. The "architectural and design integrity" of the high school building and its setting will remain intact, as the Examiner's Conclusion No. 12 intends. Correction: The Hearing Examiner's Conclusion on the impact of the proposed small parking area should recognize that this parking area will serve a unique public facility and is not a "strip-style" commercial development parking lot. The variance is intended to recognize unique situations and not to apply a "one size fits all" approach to code compliance. The smallness, the restrictions, and the landscaping of the proposed parking area will not violate the [32012-0805/SB993340.275] -2- 12/2/99 spirit of the code and will not contradict or contravene the spacious setting. No. 13 Error: The Examiner's Conclusion that "Since most of the parking for the arts center is located as close, if not closer, on the east of the new addition, reserved accessible or handicapped parking can be located in that eastern lot" is in error. The proposed small parking area on the South 2"d Street side is, in fact, substantially closer to the high school administrative offices and to the Performing Arts Center than is the new student parking lot to the east. The Renton High School project design included the small parking area to provide easy access for persons of disability and for people being dropped off, as well as for short-term parking. The proposed small parking area on the South 2"d Street side fulfills the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Renton Municipal Code requirements of making public facilities more accessible to persons of disability, as well as to parents, patrons, and citizens. Correction: The Hearing Examiner's Conclusion should recognize the greater proximity of the proposed small parking area on the South 2"d Street side for persons of disability as well as for access by parents, patrons, and citizens. This parking area fulfills code requirements for accessibility, and in addition separates parent and visitor access from the student parking lot. No. 15 Error: The Examiner's Conclusion that the proposed parking lot "pushes the variance limit and is not the minimum necessary for the relief" is in error. The purpose of a variance is to provide relief in situations of unique hardship where no special privilege is inconsistent with other property in the vicinity and the public welfare will not be harmed. Renton High School is a unique property within the Center Downtown zone. It is a public facility which is unlike any other within the zone. Building security, student safety, and public accessibility are improved by the creation of the small parking area on the South 2"d Street side. No precedent is established by a variance allowing the setback and the small parking [32012-0805/SB993340.275] -3- 12/2/99 area. Granting such a variance does not push the variance limit and is definitely the minimum necessary for relief. Correction: The Hearing Examiner's Conclusion should state that the small parking area on the South 2nd Street side is fully within the purposes and conditions for granting a variance from development standards. In fact, eliminating the small parking area will be detrimental to the public welfare. No.: 16 Error: The Examiner's Conclusion that the reason for the variance is based on the "desire to match the generous, open setback on the original building for the new architecturally similar arts center; to allow the grand architectural Gothic Revival style to be viewed as it was meant to be viewed — across an expansive open space" is in error. The School District's reason for requesting the setback variance is (1) to match the Performing Arts Center setback with that of the existing Renton High School main building, and (2) to allow for the creation of the small parking area on the South 2"d Street side that will facilitate the separation of access and security for the school and the improved accessibility by parents, patrons, and persons of disability to the school building and the Performing Arts Center. Viewing the architecture of the school building is a splendid amenity, but it is not the reason for the variance. Correction: The Hearing Examiner's Conclusion should state what the School District's reason for requesting the setback variance as part of its Renton High School Performing Arts Center and remodeling project. The School District's reason was to match the existing building setback and to allow for the creation of the small parking area. DECISION: (Please designate number as denoted in the Examiner's report) No. 1 Error: The Examiner's Decision to a require the elimination of the small parking area on the South 2"d Street side of the high school is in error. [32012-0805/SB993340.275] -4- 12/2/99 ) Correction: Based on the corrected Hearing Examiner's Conclusions, the Hearing Examiner's decision to approve the Renton High School project Site Plan and to grant the setback and landscaping variances should be corrected by also allowing the proposed small parking area on the South 2"d Street side. 3. SUMMARY OF ACTION REQUESTED: The City Council is requested to grant the following relief: (Attach explanation, if desired) X Reverse the decision or recommendation and grant the following relief: Uphold the variance for the increased front setback, including the small parking area on the South 2nd Street side. Modify the decision or recommendation as follows: Remand to the Examiner for further consideration as follows: Other PERKIM COIE LLP Bygelo&AO. /Z �u�.�.�/ w L� ! 97 Richard E. McCann Date Wayt T. Watterson Attorneys for the Renton School District NOTE: Please refer to Title JV, Chapter 8, of the Renton Municipal Code, and Section 4-8-110F, for specific procedures. [32012-0805/SB993340.275] -5- 12/2/99 , BEFORE THE CITY OF RENTON CITY COUNCIL IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION FOR RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT SITE PLAN AND VARIANCE APPROVAL FOR THE RENTON HIGH MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF SCHOOL MODERNIZATION PROJECT APPEAL FROM THE HEARING EXAMINER'S DECISION FILE NO. LUA-99-120, SA-H, V-H AND REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT [32012-0805/SB993340.185] 12/2/99 I. INTRODUCTION The Renton School District proposes to demolish the east wing of the Renton High School and to construct a Performing Arts Center in its place. As part of the project, vehicle parking, school bus dropoff/pickup, and pedestrian access to the school will also be modified to improve student safety and personal security. In addition, significant renovation of the school building interiors will be carried out. The Performing Arts Center, which will replace the existing east wing of the high school building, will contain 16,500 square feet and is designed to be aligned with the existing building façade and to match the "gothic revival" appearance of the existing building. A new student and event access and parking area, consisting of a 203-space student parking lot, a separated school bus dropoff/pickup area, and a new student building entrance, will be created north and east of the Performing Arts Center. A small, 12-space parking area is proposed on the South 2nd Street side of the Performing Arts Center to provide visitor access to the school building and dropoff for the Performing Arts Center. The student parking lot will serve for Performing Arts Center parking during non-school hours. All areas will be landscaped according to City standards. The Renton High School project required City Site Plan approval and two Variances from the applicable development regulations: (1) that the Performing Arts Center may exceed the maximum 25-foot front yard setback on South 2nd Street in order to match the existing building façade location, and (2) that the project may utilize the existing 10-foot landscaping strip along the South 2nd Street frontage, which is partially on City property, instead of relocating the landscaping entirely within the school property. On November 18, 1999, the Renton Hearing Examiner approved the Renton High School project Site Plan and granted the two Variances. The Hearing Examiner approved the Site Plan and Variances subject to three conditions: 1. The applicant shall eliminate the parking area in front of the arts center addition and may add or enhance a dropoff lane along the curb subject to review and approval of the City. 2. The applicant shall be required to provide an evergreen landscaping theme along the east margin of the site and erect or enhance a wall or fence that can buffer the uses located east of the subject site. [32012-0805/SB993340.185] 12/2/99 ti 3. The applicant shall continue to explore methods of preserving the Redwood trees that currently provide a focus around the entrance to the main building. Condition No. 1 undermines a major objective of the overall Renton High School remodeling project—separating access to the building for students, staff, and visitors in order to enhance building security and personal safety. The School District appeals that condition on the Hearing Examiner's project approval to the City Council, for the following reasons: 1. The proposed small parking area is intended for building visitors only, so that all visitors to the school will be separated from students and staff and will be restricted to the front (tower) entrance to the school, to promote building security and improve personal safety for the students and staff. 2. The proposed small parking area will provide the closest access to the school building and the Performing Arts Center for persons of disability, under the policies of the Americans with Disabilities Act. 3. The proposed small parking area will only contain approximately 12 parking spaces that will be restricted at all times to visitors and persons of disability. 4. The proposed small parking area will be fully landscaped consistent with applicable landscaping standards and consistent with the appearance of the remainder of the existing school building façade facing South 2nd Street. 5. The proposed small parking area located in front of the high school building is consistent with the intent at the time of the rezone of the school property from Public Use to Center Downtown (Public "P" suffix) to treat the property as a unique public facility and not as just another downtown parcel. 6. The proposed small parking area located in front of the high school building is consistent with areas adjacent to the east and south that are within the Downtown Core Area, which has no maximum front setback requirement. These reasons are presented in greater detail in the sections that follow. [32012-0805/SB993340.185] -2- 12/2/99 II. DISCUSSION A. The proposed small parking area is essential to the School District plan to separate building access and to promote security and personal safety. The safety and security of students and staff is of paramount concern to the Renton School District. Recent incidents around the country have focused attention on securing school buildings and restricting building access to students, staff, parents, and a few others with reason to visit school buildings. A major School District objective in the Renton High School project is to provide separate entrances to the building for students, staff, and visitors so that school personnel could better regulate access to enhance safety and security. The new student entrance by the student parking lot and bus dropoff is intended to concentrate student ingress and egress at one point. Teachers and staff will access the school building from the west parking area. The small parking area on the South 2nd Street side is intended to accommodate parents and other visitors to the building for entry at the main tower entrance. In the absence of this front parking area, such visitors will have to park in the student lot, use the student entrance, and find their way to administrative offices within the building, potentially causing difficulties for the visitors and for school security. While it is unfortunate that school administrators must redesign buildings and building access because of building security and personal safety concerns, the School District is compelled to accord a very high priority to these concerns in today's environment, especially for high schools. The Renton High School project, with the new Performing Arts Center and the student parking and bus dropoff reconfiguration, presents the opportunity to redesign the school building access to increase security and safety for students and staff The small parking area on the South 2nd Street side is an indispensable element in this redesign. Without this small parking area, visitors cannot be separated from students and staff and thereby be more closely monitored. This important objective for the small parking area was not recognized in the Hearing Examiner's Conclusions. Therefore, in the interest of student and staff safety design, we request that the Council remove the Hearing Examiner's condition that eliminates the small parking area from the Renton High School project. [32012-0805/SB993340.185] -3- 12/2/99 B. The proposed small parking area will provide the closest access to the school building and the Performing Arts Center for persons of disability. The Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA") requires the reservation of parking spaces for persons of disability in the most accessible locations to building entrances. The City of Renton adopted this requirement in its parking code. RMC 4- 4-080F(8)(e). The Renton High School project design included the small parking area on the South 2nd Street side to provide easy access both to the high school front (tower) entrance and to the front entrance of the Performing Arts Center for persons of disability and for people being dropped off, as well as for short-term parking. This small parking area is substantially closer to the high school administrative offices and to the Performing Arts Center than is the new student parking lot to the north and east of the Center. Both the Renton High School and its Performing Arts Center are unique public uses within the overall downtown area of the City of Renton. They are public resources for parents, patrons, and all citizens. The proposed small parking area on the South 2nd Street side fulfills the function of making these public resources more accessible to parents, patrons, and citizens with physical disabilities or who are being dropped off at the school or the Performing Arts Center. Such access should not be denied because of rules that were intended to apply to commercial business areas throughout the rest of Renton's downtown. The Hearing Examiner's Conclusion No. 13 acknowledged the goal of accessibility, but it determined that parking and access for visitors and persons of disability through the student parking lot was sufficient. This important objective for the small parking area on the South 2nd Street side was thus rejected. Therefore, in the interest of accessibility, the School District respectfully requests that the Council remove the Hearing Examiner's condition that eliminates the small parking area from the Renton High School project. C. The proposed small parking area will contain only 12 parking spaces that will be restricted at all times. The proposed small parking area on the South 2nd Street side of the Renton High School has been designed to serve only limited functions—as a dropoff area and as a short-term parking area for building visitors and persons of disability. All parking spaces will be restricted to those uses at all times. This parking area is not an emulation of"strip-style" commercial development parking that the City of Renton is admirably attempting to curtail. See Hearing Examiner Conclusion No. 12. [32012-0805/SB993340.185] -4- 12/2/99 I Once again, the proposed small parking area will serve the unique public resources of the Renton High School and its Performing Arts Center. The 12 restricted parking spaces and dropoff area will make these resources more accessible to more citizens of Renton. D. The proposed small parking area will be landscaped consistent with applicable landscaping standards and with the appearance of the existing school building facade. The proposed small parking area on the South 2nd Street side will be landscaped in compliance with the requirements of RMC 4-4-080F(7) on parking lot landscaping. There is existing landscaping in front of the gothic facade of the main Renton High School building. Both components of the South 2nd Street side landscaping will be coordinated so that the "aura of gothic scale" and the "spacious setting" will be preserved and enhanced. The "architectural and design integrity" of the high school building and its setting will remain intact, as the Hearing Examiner's Conclusions intended. See Hearing Examiner Conclusion No. 12. In addition to the preservation of the high school building's design integrity, the proposed small parking lot on the South 2nd Street side will actually add to the average citizen and visitor's sense of the main building because the parking and dropoff area will appear congenial and approachable and encourage the use of the front entrance, as noted by the Hearing Examiner. Hearing Examiner Conclusion No. 13. Thus, the combination of appropriate landscaping and approachability will enhance the sense of beauty conveyed to the City far more than retaining the building in its current state. E. The proposed small parking area is consistent with the City's intent at the time of the school property rezone to treat the property as a unique public facility. Until 1995, the Renton High School property was zoned as Public Use, with development standards applicable to that zone which would fully permit the requested Performing Arts Center setback and the small parking area on the South 2nd Street side. The City of Renton undertook a process in 1993 and 1994 to convert all Public Use property classifications to conform to the zoning classifications of the surrounding properties. The Renton School District participated in that process because of its numerous public facilities in Public Use zoning. While the focus of the process was on development standards and notice procedures for public facilities located within residential areas, the School District was repeatedly assured that special development standards would apply to its properties which would allow the same flexibility as it previously had. [32012-0805/SB993340.185] -5- 12/2/99 A / The Planning Commission and the City Council approved a "P-suffix" overlay zone that applies to Renton High School and other Renton School District properties. However, the P-suffix overlay development standards include only relief from the height restrictions of the underlying zone, because of the focus on residential zones. The approved P-suffix overlay zone did not address the issue of maximum setback requirements in the CD zone and how it would adversely affect School District properties—even though allowing the School District the same development standard flexibility as it had previously enjoyed under Public Use was the clear intention during the process, as evidenced in numerous correspondence and meeting minutes. Renton High School is a unique public facility that happens to be located in the CD zone. The CD development standards overly restrict what the School District may reasonably do to improve its property, in direct contradiction of the assurances the School District received during the rezone process. In such a situation, a variance to rectify the problem is fully justified, but the Hearing Examiner granted it with a significant condition that undermines major School District objectives in seeking the variance. The small parking area is essential to the School District objectives in its modernization and improvement project for Renton High School. Such a parking area was permitted under the previous development standards and should be permitted for the same public facility now. F. The proposed small parking area is consistent with adjacent areas within the Downtown Core Area that have no maximum front setback requirement. The Downtown Core Area overlay zone that modifies certain development standards of the underlying zone for properties located within the area. RMC 4-2- 120C(15). One modification is that there is no maximum front setback requirement for properties zoned CD that are located within the Downtown Core Area. RMC 4-2- 120B. Other properties within the CD zone, such as the Renton High School, are subject to a maximum front setback. The Downtown Core Area designation abuts the Renton High School property on the east and on the south. If the high school property had been included in the Core Area, it would not have needed the setback variance and the small parking area would have been allowed. Therefore, the small parking area should be allowed as part of the granted setback variance for fairness and consistency with the privileges of the surrounding properties. [32012-0805/SB993340.185] -6- 12/2/99 p III. REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT In order to adequately present these issues to the Council, and to provide an opportunity for the Council to obtain answers to any questions it may have, the School District respectfully requests an opportunity to present an Oral Argument to the Council on this Appeal. DATED this 2nd day of December, 1999. Respectfully submitted, PERKINS COIE LLP B4 44-4-r �� Richard E. McCann Wayt T. Watterson Attorneys for the Renton School District [32012-0805/SB993340.185] _7_ 12/2/99 November 18, 1999 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION • APPLICANT: Renton School District Renton High School Modernization File No.: LUA-99-120,SA-H,V-H LOCATION: 400 S 2nd Street SUMMARY OF REQUEST: To modernize Renton High School, and to construct 16,500 square foot performing arts center. The proposal also requires approval of two variances. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Development Services Recommendation: Approve with conditions DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REPORT: The Development Services Report was received by the Examiner on October 19, 1999 PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Development Services Report,examining available information on file with the application,field checking the property and surrounding area;the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The following minutes are a summary of the October 26, 1999 hearing. The legal record is recorded on tape. The hearing opened on Tuesday,October 26, 1999,at 10:05 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of the Renton City Hall. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing the original Exhibit No.2: Vicinity map application,proof of posting,proof of publication and _other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No.3: Site plan Exhibit No.4: Landscape plan Exhibit No.5: South building elevation Exhibit No.6: Southeast-northwest building elevation Exhibit No.7: North building elevation Exhibit No.8: East building elevation The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by PETER ROSEN,Project Manager,Development Services,City of Renton, 1055 S Grady Way,Renton,Washington 98055. The applicant seeks site plan approval for the modernization of the existing Renton High School,and construction of a new Performing Arts Center(PAC). The 25-acre campus is located in the downtown area and is surrounded by residential and Pe Renton School District Renton High School Modernization File No.: LUA-99-120,SA-H,V-H November 18, 1999 Page 3 building and the east wing which the PAC is replacing exceed the maximum setback. The PAC building would be located closer to the front property line than the existing building,thus decreasing the level of non- conformity. The applicant also requests a variance from the 10 foot wide landscape requirement strip along S 2nd Street. Currently five feet of the landscape strip is within the City's right-of-way with an adjacent sidewalk. In order to comply with the code,the applicant would be required to move the entire existing sidewalk along the entire frontage of the property and replace it with landscaping. Staff feels that this requirement is incommensurate with the project proposal and would pose a hardship upon the applicant. Mr.Rosen detailed the variance criteria which the applicant must meet, including undue hardship,detrimental affect upon public,granting of a special privilege,and whether the proposal is a minimum variance. Staff concluded that the granting of the variances was appropriate and that the applicant met the required criteria. Guy Overman,Northwest Architectural Company,2201 6th Avenue,#1405, Seattle,Washington 98121, applicant representative herein, elaborated on the facade development of the design,including the historical style,integration of the new design and the current condition of the structure. It is being recommended that the redwood trees located at the front entry be removed as they are overgrown and putting significant pressure against the foundation. The seismic upgrade of the facade could also be compromised by these trees. Mr. Overman described the different traffic patterns and parking requirements for the facility. Regarding the variance requests,Mr. Overman explained the orientation of the PAC to the site and other adjacent uses. The orientation of the PAC to the school and the architectural features of the new complex would be disrupted by maintaining the required maximum setback of 25 feet. The removal of the smoke stack and the ultimate height of the building were discussed,as well as the landscaping buffers located on the eastern portion of the site. Betty Nokes,Economic Development Director,City of Renton, 1055 S Grady Way,Renton,Washington 98055, spoke regarding the PAC and its importance to the community. One of the goals was to tie it to a joint use with the school,and the design of the building and the landscaping had received good public support. Arneta Henninger,Development Services,City of Renton, 1055 S Grady Way,Renton,Washington 98055, responded that a water main extension may be required,but it will be handled in the plan review process. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak,and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 11:40 a.m. FINDINGS,CONCLUSIONS &DECISION Having reviewed the record in this matter,the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: • 1. The applicant,Renton School District,filed a request for approval of a Site Plan for school renovation together with a variance from setback provisions and a variance from landscape provisions. 2. The yellow file containing the staff report,the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA)documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit#1. 41 Renton School District Renton High School Modernization File No.: LUA-99-120,SA-H,V-H November 18, 1999 Page 5 14. The CD zone permits buildings to be 95 feet high or 110 feet if zoned with a P-suffix which the site has. The proposed changes will have a maximum height of 56 feet. None of the additions will exceed the height of the existing structure. There will be a variety of roof heights across the campus with clock tower and gables and dormers on the performance center. Height limits are subject to review by the FAA since the campus is located in the Renton Airport's flight corridor. It does not appear that the new construction will intrude into the protected slope corridor. As noted, a taller smokestack will be removed. 15. The existing complex is served by 289 parking stalls. The applicant proposei adding 167 stalls mainly east of the performance center. The complex would have a total of 456 stalls. Staff has calculated that the proposal would require 240 stalls for design capacity. The arts center requires 138 stalls. Staff noted that the arts center and the rest of the complex probably will not have overlapping parking needs, meaning the arts center generally would function when the school is not in session. Providing excess parking requires administrative review. The Public Works Director has yet to rule on the deviation from parking standards. 16. Staff noted that the parking on the east abuts residential uses located along Logan Avenue. Deciduous trees and shrubs were proposed. While the zoning in that area is CD, staff recommended that they be protected from noise impacts by additional fencing and landscaping and the applicant agreed to bolster efforts along the eastern boundary of the subject site. 17. The applicant proposes altering circulation patterns to separate passenger vehicles from school bus arrivals and departures. The interior roadway west of the main building will be divided ending the existing through-circulation. Buses will now arrive and enter and exit a closed loop accessed from Logan. Buses will generally not be parked on campus. 18. Staff has recommended that the large Redwood trees that flank the entrance to the main building be retained if possible. The applicant proposes removing those trees since they would make work on the front of the building more difficult and appear to be placing pressure on the foundation. 19. The southernmost point on the facade of the proposed arts center would be aligned with the current main building. It would be set back 82 feet from the street. The CD Zone requires buildings to be set back not more than 25 feet from the property line. The intent is to avoid strip commercial development where the parking becomes the foreground and the commercial facades are removed from pedestrian paths. The east wing that would be demolished actually exceeds the required setback by even more. 20. The applicant has applied for a variance to allow the new arts center to be set back more than 25 feet from the front property line to integrate it into the campus design. The proposed setback would be 82 feet. 21. The code requires properties in the CD zone to provide ten(10)feet of landscaping along street frontages. The applicant proposes to maintain the existing landscaping and sidewalk arrangement. Currently five feet of the existing landscaping is located on the subject site and five feet is located on the public right-of-way. A sidewalk is located interior to this landscaping on the applicant's property. The applicant has applied for a variance to allow the current landscaping and sidewalk arrangement to continue as it is. If the landscaping were provided as required,the sidewalk would have to be relocated at the curb line. 1, • ' Renton School District Renton High School Modernization File No.: LUA-99-120,SA-H,V-H November 18, 1999 Page 7 would not be sufficient to screen those uses,particularly in the evening hours when the arts center would be attracting patrons. The applicant shall be required to provide an evergreen landscaping theme along this margin of the site and erect a wall or fence that can buffer the uses located east of the site. 5. The proposed design carries over the Gothic Revival architecture of the original high school building. The design opens up the east side of the campus and provides a variety of visual elements including the very modulated and articulated arts center as well as the clock tower. The closing of the through-road located immediately west of the main building will also lessen the impacts on the subject site. The proposed removal of the Redwood trees will alter the focus around the main building,and the applicant should continue to explore methods of preserving those trees. Mature trees of this size and nature are hard to replace. 6. The development of the site will probably have an impact on the properties to the east of the site since traffic, including bus traffic,will be transferred to that area of the campus. This will be offset by the lessened impact on the properties north of the site where lessened bus traffic will result. 7. The new circulation patterns appear to be safe. They separate out the bus and general vehicular traffic. Pathways are provided for pedestrians through the parking areas and connecting to the school. 8. The campus buildings all observe reasonable setbacks from property lines or adjacent property. The way the arts center is attached to the.main building,by a lowrise corridor,and the angular orientation of the arts center will permit light and air to reach more of the main building. 9. Adequate City infrastructure is available to serve the subject site and its new development. Variance to Exceed Required 25 Foot Front Yard Setback 10. Variances may be granted when the property generally satisfies all the conditions described in part below: a. The applicant suffers undue hardship caused by special circumstances such as:the size, shape,topography, or location where code enforcement would deprive the owner of rights and privileges enjoyed by others similarly situated; b. The granting of the variance would not materially harm either the public welfare or other property in the vicinity; c. The approval will not constitute a special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other property in the vicinity;and d. The variance is the minimum variance necessary to allow reasonable development of the subject site. The applicant's property appears ripe for the variance requested subject to eliminating the parking lot in front of the arts center. 11. The subject site's primary building,the High School building, is set back 82 feet from the street. It represents an earlier style of grand architecture where the building was set on an expansive lot. The building style is Gothic Revival. The building is a focal point with a large front lawn or open space tio Renton School District Renton High School Modernization File No.: LUA-99-120,SA-H,V-H November 18, 1999 Page 9 are located on the public right-of-way and five feet are on the applicant's property. Relocating the sidewalk would mean moving it closer to the street. There would be less intervening landscaping or a smaller parking strip to buffer pedestrians from road traffic. In addition,currently,the "public sidewalk" is located on the applicant's site which is also unusual. It appears the applicant accommodated pedestrians prior to the City installing sidewalks in this area. 19. Approving the variance will not harm the public nor other property in the vicinity. The total landscaping will be 10 feet as required by code,only it is not entirely provided on the subject site. The applicant has ceded its property for a public walkway and in turn can benefit from landscaping on the public right-of-way. 20. Due to the location of the sidewalk on the applicant's property already, it would not grant the applicant a special privilege. 21. As indicated above, if the parking lot proposed for the front of the arts center is eliminated,this variance may be unnecessary. The variance would allow development of the subject site with a safe sidewalk location and adequate landscaping. 22. In conclusion, in the main the proposal will both upgrade and extend the life of a unique and beloved institution,the Renton High School,while adding a valuable addition to the cultural life of the City. As noted,the variances appear justified but subject to eliminating the parking lot in front of the arts center and adjusting the landscaping as reasonable. DECISION: The Site Plan and Variances are approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall eliminate the parking area in front of the arts center addition and may add or enhance a dropoff lane along the curb subject to review and approval of the City. 2. The applicant shall be required to provide an evergreen landscaping theme along the east margin of the site and erect or enhance a wall or fence that can buffer the uses located east of the subject site. 3. The applicant shall continue to explore methods of preserving the Redwood trees that currently provide a focus around the entrance to the main building. ORDERED THIS 18th day of November, 1999. FRED J.KA HEARING E R TRANSMI i hD THIS 18th day of November, 1999 to the parties of record: Peter Rosen Guy Overman Betty Nokes 1055 S Grady Way 2201 6th Avenue,#1405 1055 S Grady Way Renton,WA 98055 Seattle,WA 98121 Renton,WA 98055 • ii • I i I •,•..:: • ilVi .•• �`'J...JAI.f q.-'• -/V`/• 11 br.f�6 l•_r ' � • t:y; a: �IQfi ';yLs �j;!'•I I '^ s { ab L;¢`0 r • + • • �_ = r t • •t'' •. • • � � '�' l � 1.� . Sri , i y. +.. .ti'+• , . • • •„.„.......:. •• •. ......,..::. .• 1,,,, .....„,•„,,,.., .....„,, ,,,,- z , ...:. . •,„..:.... . . •,. . 74 • •• . , • .. .., i '''.• 4.,Wc.".4 leilgt1.44 ... • .•.• • • • •.. • •.,.. ., . it %\'t.'4,„„.-• AwIr •oreporsot a L-,1 _ ,.• , • -• 1 >t ;p-ri4-tV-i.rr,:/ai"F.Ai..lcMIitih PZ11.li.Rg...,I 1ieiz.,1 t � . ;ice f _ L o a'�.a . ••,• ' • I rj„ s•._Y' .Lr:. �rop w.. u" : C' 4#1 j .,4:•.:..' j••i•..1y 19a4». aYn'..C�"u ��Bie ��RIi9'LY71�; /../(/. .--; . ( u rF\_.7f���yt'F! u • D •q yGy y r. .' fit: t >,t`i p.Putdi ate' .; - 1 ' ••. • • '.. • ''. Ito's. .e.c. \ ,,... 1 ...\ - i . , ..,„,,,,wa: . • • w• 1 / / /.i - ;•'•.. ::. 2 • • _. 4. . •• 0' • • . r, • •• • MVI.IO.. .;4 r--liF .• ...• . i - .a..mrsa.s.w�', I m 1111. ffiY'i Np1W1Y..rt.a...l.[ •"'C'>�iT� �I1f■1� I I i] B®© p 'I I.' lil it .U' - • Fk • ' I ' ---?t:''' = 7., 14_037,,,v. ...e.,0 Li On li' alt II Ii ll ll 11 11 11 11 ll ll 1 11 I: ®®®I �, '�'��' I I[ f Ilr NT4N Mlex i4NooJl _I_ _ . a b • I I I . o . �� • - 00000 100000000 I • . o"oa"o1. _ "" o0 0" "", 00 ]L oal� H1. r' ,00 00 00 00, • i i OSOUTH ELEVATION ScINc I -I'-0• - • • ee•••rar...e.. • ,',f . • ` • 99G6@p11111111fIlE liffC�VII111VVIII6IWI!99111�VIIWIIIIsw iblit,;J•r'• rp:rv.1r� —mil r� ' l �{11124 f�IflljNjlrfFi.F:r t.2.y o% ri?r rrfj'7. f r, rJJ1{ljfifi rt ��� rklll�jJl�jlftli fl�liiijlt{�ft►lrallrfjf rr {l�rrllJ irrdrrr, • - U,- Fj�'rf f,F!l�.104,te t V�ii... r'a • r,;.rrJJitli,er?i!►f1141�,� r?Ifr�.,.r,lj.{r+�rret:.ttieflaf�lJ.�lr ,.trl i fs ■nvss. fr'Yibirp:t..., .. ...ea.,• _ CC b!rlrJtrJtrli7�tJr. •.rrT1r'J?r'!�1 J 7 • 13' a rifrrlrt{r?11?GJL1!•. t' iVI!,ri�ii rritllli{u?rG►lJl{IlIIJ!{rLrL:tn{�rri:{t!..—.r 7&:lJr!}:{r ir&'lutr..... Cana ton. U r i.61421167'rrj}1! g cula IJ' mig •'_''',y50� i:; #+l kr . —�3.'�°r� U co n .SR.iL, _:.�u { '}, le W.V{{.LYS .1X.7.41 ffie t. 'S :}.7- " ;{CV{ �lr „,,,„ w+}'ir.....0:x{ m vx �{:. �r 4•.x.:4n.:, b • «•J}•1V :{L nium t�,j{1:::{:T:rl�}�'l.•raw,u .. �,,.. 'arn."{ ru . J. c • JlfI f r {� : un° :il^C::::::...Y�rr� t.J� p.• , {::�•�' � — — .triN fits' v;{t . .., ^r riSAtri .,". .,:t:: f,�,ak-a,";: - : a '1p7p��}�'1 , 4•t 1 i k':.,X,•emaw r.?LL, auw :r r: {� J �aFx • "Fill I1I' • fry r•t rr! 1.{f,. i{{v : � i J sp.f I:41'V.} r••r'. w .I �. . .Ic b "I ill ,, tef,i rj fi 1�..v§.1..'74 ri ; . 3ir. •r! rr 1, ,, 1 ,h.. n.„. ,! ,1.:),Allot'.4 in ��® l ,0 N. thiVi lek its +} • to ? °e.i. R v...,7 i r I r!{11 1 < :i9 rr �, l .ram ...twirl,. a`.i.''. rdmitlbulu' •-•� c1rat./r..hMb:11 ti./ ,1 .'4fg. I, II ijk1 , y� I .� 1 i .Y; , t,`�� 'f L�� Il:lt. ' ?tti a.�.l:.-� ., r." r i �°' l ! � f 1 f'i}„t r 6' ,i':r ' ' ii it pi l'I x� I v J�ei � + 3 I Y 4 '1,51,4M e1 J L I r r f � 7 r!t.. 1�if.J , e , r,!�ti w�a�J���J��I� iroyfi, f JJ ..., s �k1�� r r �r , ,I ;lykr��J��d10�1�1���� t}�r+iJr<jl{r{;I � ir Jt''J S'S1 ' ; �; r r r:"' ! {� rrl1� !r al •,l"J1{ jirC?zFr bwW* ! . Ia r�!r 6d1�1 � °:: 7 r!-_` �'I II r 1: n 5 " s �:'. CC fJ tJ 1.�JJ. ,I AlI I .1 1 rt:1J1 ll.�J11 �� t:lL III' 4f t�.'::7 '•• p y 11e�a 1111 riw f€ �� ,:. 2 Q �__�_ilrill a�� >�;�_. •e:_ ate .�a:� txo ��. 1I..�.r-ra'�.... s q r 1n10i • u�y I� "f ,, t.l y. -_oa oonip�n� a,? �, i ®� �� ,�' IIIIII �, _ ®ry�/�� illlii _FLingsg,uvi,i.i. U® .,,, ,A 'J } DOlOO � •I.!1Y� ,,iilj �;I;Yd ���� ' :,�' I}�7 VJIrtl` y ' � �2 f:;,��•�x �I�I�N�I�'h'����' oo as 3:�!E°;i���'.'.«tl:��1! ®I ■ 1�1� �� ,..,- �rEl00I�0I,01r,� �'' I� �'?;•? 1s:?�E"$;e:,'.�•�'�'�r���. 11 ® RIlKEIVEMiZ1NI9E _ist. ;'�a�,00,aa. o,_M ... MEN � ..� , . LL....e...MOB I...L..• - MaM r . lO IP . O .a.:s a.wu um w.Orr• SOUTH ELEVATION MATERIALS LEGEND plug UP 2 :•.u...N 2. • I:t ""w.". .r mots ..[d 7-.e01 • • . Ir tl4. nt R2v-1 • {:, ' ..' ...•. III III NI "'"'''r„e~ imI,ite IMI ai .-le-M • WOKS lIIIN!'; ...1.Inv.Avow,es. *mud .- A euiA-r.. 1 December 7, 1999 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. COUNTY OF KING ) MARILYN J. PETERSEN, City Clerk/Cable Manager for the City of Renton, being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says that she is a citizen of the United States and a resident of the State of Washington, over the age of 21 and not a party to nor interested in this matter. That on the 7th day of December, 1999, at the hour of 5:00 p.m your affiant duly mailed and placed in the United States Post Office at Renton, King County, Washington, by first class mail to all parties of record, notice of appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision filed by Renton School District, representated by Richard E. McCann and Wayt T. Watterson of Perkins Coie LLP (File No. LUA-99-120, SA-H, V-H). . arilyn . P t rsen, City Clerk/Cable Manager SL.J C ,p AND SWORN TO BEFORE me this 7th day of December, 1999. i.i` ...., 10r a frTA :\4:eGvn V1 tiipl y '':P•• s n and for the State of 1as -1110 ;4esiding in s i CITY CLERK DIVISION Send Copies To: �zi1 161 Date: CITY ATTORNEY 19 CITY COUNCIL COMMUNITY SERVICES/PARKS stut (, JA dri EDNSP/ECONOMIC DEVELOP. FINANCE/INFO SERVICES � 64401 �,_ `f" FIRE DEPT/FIRE PREVENTION �,�I �"I / HEARING EXAMINER HUMAN RESOURCES/RISK MGMT HUMAN SERVICES LIBRARIES MAYOR/EXECUTIVE MUNICIPAL COURT PLANNING COMMISSION 41 POLICE CODIFIER NEWSPAPER PARTIES OF RECORD Planning/Building/Public Works: `��niM.!/1�I►14."-• ADMINISTRATION ( AT AIRPORT jeot. 14n DEVELOPMENT SERVICES rrw.("�",��/�,i TRANSPORTATION SERVICES j UTILITIES&TECH SERVICES 1, "` iiO4/11�" " / 1 r. IP, �'� ®09I5 JasE1 slagei ssaippy ®J12nAtt! �U Peter Vosen, Senior Planner Guy Overman Betty Nokes ,Development Services 2201 6th Avenue, #1405 EDNSP Seattle, WA 98121 Arneta Henninger Renton School District Dr. Bruce Williams Development Services Attn: Jack Connell 128 Rainier Avenue S 1220 N 4th Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055 Richard E. McCann Perkins Coie LLP 1201 Third Ave., 48th Floor Seattle, WA 98101 Pi24-61 Po, CZ _tom 7) C09I5 aoJ aaeldwaa asf -:,N,ry'z - rvo„V1(_ Nf 1 ws wis1aayr, paaj yfoowS 4 CIT. OF RENTON rs City Clerk Jesse Tanner,Mayor Marilyn J. Petersen December 7, 1999 APPEAL FILED BY: Renton School District Representative: Richard E. McCann and Wayt T. Watterson of Perkins Coie LLP RE: Appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision dated 11/18/99 regarding the Site Plan and Variance Application for the Modernization of Renton High School located at 400 S 2nd Street. File No. LUA-99-120, SA-H, V-H. To Parties of Record: Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Renton City Code of Ordinances,written appeal of the hearing examiner's decision regarding the site plan and variance application of the above referenced site has been filed with the City Clerk. In accordance with Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110F,within five days of receipt of the notice of appeal, the City Clerk shall notify all parties of record of the receipt of the appeal. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the written appeals and other pertinent documents will be reviewed by the Council's Planning and Development Committee. The Council secretary will notify all parties of record of the date and time of the Planning and Development Committee meeting. The recommendation of the Committee will be presented for consideration by the full Council at a subsequent Council meeting. Attached is a copy of the Renton Municipal Code regarding appeals of hearing examiner decisions or recommendations. Please note that the City Council will be considering the merits of the appeal based upon the written record previously established. Unless a showing can be made that additional evidence could not reasonably have been available at the prior hearing held by the Hearing Examiner,no further evidence or testimony on this matter will be accepted by the City Council. For additional information or assistance,please feel free to call me at (425) 430-6502. Sincerely, Marilyn J. Pe sen, CMC City Clerk Attachment 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 - (425)430-6510 / FAX(425)430-6516 ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer City of Renton Municipa de; Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 110 - ).„Jals 4-8-110C3 Any appeal shall be filed in writing. The written notice of appeal shall fully, clearly and thoroughly specify the substantial error(s) in fact or law which exist in the record of the proceedings from which the appellant seeks relief. (Ord. 4353, 6-1-92) 4-8-110C4 The notice of appeal shall be accompanied by a fee in accordance with RMC 4-1-170, the fee schedule of the City. (Ord. 3658, 9-13-82) 4-8-110E8 Unless an ordinance providing for review of decision of the Examiner requires review thereof by the Superior Court, any interested party aggrieved by the Examiner's written decision or recommendation may submit a notice of appeal to the City Clerk upon a form furnished by the City Clerk, within fourteen (14) calendar days from the date of the Examiner's written report. (Ord. 3658, 9-13-82) 4-8-110F: Appeals to City Council - Procedures: 1. Notice to Parties of Record: Within five (5) days of receipt of the notice of appeal, the City Clerk shall notify all parties of record of the receipt of the appeal. 2. Opportunity to Provide Comments: Other parties of record may submit letters in support of their positions within ten (10) days of the dates of mailing of the notification of the filing of the notice of appeal. 3. Transmittal of Record to Council: Thereupon the Clerk shall forward to the members of the City Council all of the pertinent documents, including the written decision or recommendation, findings and conclusions contained in the Examiner's report, the notice of appeal, and additional letters submitted by the parties. (Ord. 3658, 9-13-82) 4. Council Review Procedures: No public hearing shall be held by the City Council. No new or additional evidence or testimony shall be accepted by the City Council unless a showing is made by the party offering the evidence that the evidence could not reasonably have been available at the time of the hearing before the Examiner. If the Council determines that additional evidence is required,the Council shall remand the matter to the Examiner for reconsideration and receipt of additional evidence. The cost of transcription of the hearing record shall be borne by the appellant. In the absence of any entry upon the record of an order by the City Council authorizing new or additional evidence or testimony, and a remand to the Hearing Examiner for receipt of such evidence or testimony, it shall be presumed that no new or additional evidence or testimony has been accepted by the City Council, and that the record before the City Council is identical to the hearing record before the Hearing Examiner. (Ord. 4389, 1-25- 93) 5. Council Evaluation Criteria: The consideration by the City Council shall be based solely upon the record, the Hearing Examiner's report, the notice of appeal and additional submissions by parties. 6. Findings and Conclusions Required: If, upon appeal of a decision of the Hearing Examiner on an application submitted pursuant to Section RMC 4-1-050F1 and after examination of the record, the Council determines that a substantial error in fact or law exists in the record, it may remand the preceding to Examiner for reconsideration, or modify, or reverse the decision of the Examiner accordingly. 7. Council Action: If, upon appeal from a recommendation of the Hearing Examiner upon an application submitted pursuant to Section RMC 4-1-050F2 and F3, and after examination of the record, the Council determines that a substantial error in fact or law exists in the record, or that a recommendation of the Hearing Examiner should be disregarded or modified, the City Council may remand the proceeding to the Examiner for reconsideration, or enter its own decision upon the application. 8. Decision Documentation: In any event, the decision of the City Council shall be in writing and shall specify any modified or amended findings and conclusions other than those set forth in the report of the Hearing Examiner. Each material finding shall be supported by substantial evidence in the record. The burden of proof shall rest with the appellant. (Ord. 3658, 9-13-82) 9. Council Action Final: The action of the Council approving, modifying or rejectin, decision of the Examiner shall be final and conclusive, unless appealed within the time frames unr4er subsection G5 of this Section. (Ord. 4660, 3-17-1997) PERKINS COIE LLP 1201 THIRD AVENUE, SUITE 4800•SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98101-3099 TELEPHONE: 206 583-8888• FACSIMILE: 206 583-8500 RICHARD E.McCArrrr CITY OF RENTON (206)583-8618 mccan@perkinscoie.com DEC 0 2 1999 RECEIVED December 2, 1999 CITY CLEtiy�'`.JFrICE .0o P 'Y` City Clerk City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 • Re: File No. LUA-99-120, SA-H, V-H Dear City Clerk: Attached is the Renton School District's Written Appeal of the Hearing Examiner's Decision to the Renton City Council on the above-referenced file. Also attached is the Renton School District's Memorandum in Support of Appeal from the Hearing Examiner's Decision and Request for Oral Argument. The required appeal fee of$75.00 is enclosed. Please acknowledge receipt of this Appeal with notice to all parties of record. Thank you for your attention. Very truly yours, Richard E. McCann REM:sab Enclosure cc: Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer Sue Carlson, Administrator, Economic Development, Neighborhoods, and Strategic Planning Betty Nokes, Economic Development Director Larry Warren, City Attorney [32012-0805/SB993360.016] ANCHORAGE BELLEVUE BOISE DENVER HONG KONG LOS ANGELES MENLO PARK OLYMPIA PORTLAND SAN FRANCISCO SEATTLE SPOKANE TAIPEI WASHINGTON, D.C. STRATEGIC ALLIANCE: RUSSELL&DuMOULIN,VANCOUVER, CANADA CITY OF RENTON DEC 021999 APPEAL RECEIVED CITY CLERK'S OFFICE HEARING EXAMINER WRITTEN APPEAL OF HEARING EXAMINER'S DECISION TO THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL FILE NO.: LUA-99-120, SA-H, V-H APPLICATION NAME: Renton High School Modernization Project The undersigned interested party hereby files its Notice of Appeal from the decision or recommendation of the Land Use Hearing Examiner, dated November 18, 1999. 1. IDENTIFICATION OF PARTY APPELLANT: REPRESENTATIVE (IF ANY): Name: Renton School District Name: Richard E. McCann Address: 1220 North 4th Street Wayt T. Watterson Renton, WA 98055 Address: Perkins Coie LLP 1201 Third Avenue, 48th Floor Seattle, WA 98101 Telephone: (425) 204-4475 Telephone: (206) 583-8888 2. SPECIFICATION OF ERRORS (Attach additional sheets,_if necessary) Set forth below are the specific errors of law or fact upon which this appeal is based: CONCLUSIONS: (Please designate number as denoted in the Examiner's report) No. 12 Error: The Examiner's Conclusion that: "While the goal of serving the front entrance of the main building with parking is intended to encourage use of the front entrance and appears congenial, the front entry can serve students, teachers or parents who arrive on foot or via transit," is in error because it misses the fundamental School District objective in designing the small parking lot on the South 2nd Street side. The School District intends the small parking area as a key element in reconfiguring access to the high school buildings in the important interest of building security and personal safety for students and staff. All student ingress and egress is to be from the student parking lot to the north and east of the Performing Arts [32012-0805/SB993340.275] 12/2/99 spirit of the code and will not contradict or contravene the spacious setting. No. 13 Error: The Examiner's Conclusion that "Since most of the parking for the arts center is located as close, if not closer, on the east of the new addition, reserved accessible or handicapped parking can be located in that eastern lot" is in error. The proposed small parking area on the South 2"d Street side is, in fact, substantially closer to the high school administrative offices and to the Performing Arts Center than is the new student parking lot to the east. The Renton High School project design included the small parking area to provide easy access for persons of disability and for people being dropped off, as well as for short-term parking. The proposed small parking area on the South 2"d Street side fulfills the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Renton Municipal Code requirements of making public facilities more accessible to persons of disability, as well as to parents, patrons, and citizens. Correction: The Hearing Examiner's Conclusion should recognize the greater proximity of the proposed small parking area on the South 2"d Street side for persons of disability as well as for access by parents, patrons, and citizens. This parking area fulfills code requirements for accessibility, and in addition separates parent and visitor access from the student parking lot. No. 15 Error: The Examiner's Conclusion that the proposed parking lot "pushes the variance limit and is not the minimum necessary for the relief" is in error. The purpose of a variance is to provide relief in situations of unique hardship where no special privilege is inconsistent with other property in the vicinity and the public welfare will not be harmed. Renton High School is a unique property within the Center Downtown zone. It is a public facility which is unlike any other within the zone. Building security, student safety, and public accessibility are improved by the creation of the small parking area on the South 2"d Street side. No precedent is established by a variance allowing the setback and the small parking [32012-0805/SB993340.275 1 -3- 12/2/99 Correction: Based on the corrected Hearing Examiner's Conclusions, the Hearing Examiner's decision to approve the Renton High School project Site Plan and to grant the setback and landscaping variances should be corrected by also allowing the proposed small parking area on the South 2nd Street side. 3. SUMMARY OF ACTION REQUESTED: The City Council is requested to grant the following relief: (Attach explanation, if desired) X Reverse the decision or recommendation and grant the following relief: Uphold the variance for the increased front setback, including the small parking area on the South 2nd Street side. Modify the decision or recommendation as follows: Remand to the Examiner for further consideration as follows: Other PER COIE LLP By gc--elet-t.r Richard E. McCann Date Wayt T. Watterson Attorneys for the Renton School District NOTE: Please refer to Title JV, Chapter 8, of the Renton Municipal Code, and Section 4-8-110F, for specific procedures. [32012-0805/SB993340.275] -5- 12/2/99 BEFORE THE CITY OF RENTON CITY COUNCIL IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION FOR RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT SITE PLAN AND VARIANCE APPROVAL FOR THE RENTON HIGH MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF SCHOOL MODERNIZATION PROJECT APPEAL FROM THE HEARING EXAMINER'S DECISION FILE NO. LUA-99-120, SA-H, V-H AND REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT [32012-0805/SB993340.185] 12/2/99 3. The applicant shall continue to explore methods of preserving the Redwood trees that currently provide a focus around the entrance to the main building. Condition No. 1 undermines a major objective of the overall Renton High School remodeling project—separating access to the building for students, staff, and visitors in order to enhance building security and personal safety. The School District appeals that condition on the Hearing Examiner's project approval to the City Council, for the following reasons: 1. The proposed small parking area is intended for building visitors only, so that all visitors to the school will be separated from students and staff and will be restricted to the front (tower) entrance to the school, to promote building security and improve personal safety for the students and staff. 2. The proposed small parking area will provide the closest access to the school building and the Performing Arts Center for persons of disability, under the policies of the Americans with Disabilities Act. 3. The proposed small parking area will only contain approximately 12 parking spaces that will be restricted at all times to visitors and persons of disability. 4. The proposed small parking area will be fully landscaped consistent with applicable landscaping standards and consistent with the appearance of the remainder of the existing school building façade facing South 2nd Street. 5. The proposed small parking area located in front of the high school building is consistent with the intent at the time of the rezone of the school property from Public Use to Center Downtown (Public "P" suffix) to treat the property as a unique public facility and not as just another downtown parcel. 6. The proposed small parking area located in front of the high school building is consistent with areas adjacent to the east and south that are within the Downtown Core Area, which has no maximum front setback requirement. These reasons are presented in greater detail in the sections that follow. [32012-0805/SB993340.185] -2- 12/2/99 • B. The proposed small parking area will provide the closest access to the school building and the Performing Arts Center for persons of disability. The Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA") requires the reservation of parking spaces for persons of disability in the most accessible locations to building entrances. The City of Renton adopted this requirement in its parking code. RMC 4- 4-080F(8)(e). The Renton High School project design included the small parking area on the South 2nd Street side to provide easy access both to the high school front (tower) entrance and to the front entrance of the Performing Arts Center for persons of disability and for people being dropped off, as well as for short-term parking. This small parking area is substantially closer to the high school administrative offices and to the Performing Arts Center than is the new student parking lot to the north and east of the Center. Both the Renton High School and its Performing Arts Center are unique public uses within the overall downtown area of the City of Renton. They are public resources for parents, patrons, and all citizens. The proposed small parking area on the South 2nd Street side fulfills the function of making these public resources more accessible to parents, patrons, and citizens with physical disabilities or who are being dropped off at the school or the Performing Arts Center. Such access should not be denied because of rules that were intended to apply to commercial business areas throughout the rest of Renton's downtown. The Hearing Examiner's Conclusion No. 13 acknowledged the goal of accessibility, but it determined that parking and access for visitors and persons of disability through the student parking lot was sufficient. This important objective for the small parking area on the South 2nd Street side was thus rejected. Therefore, in the interest of accessibility, the School District respectfully requests that the Council remove the Hearing Examiner's condition that eliminates the small parking area from the Renton High School project. C. The proposed small parking area will contain only 12 parking spaces that will be restricted at all times. The proposed small parking area on the South 2"d Street side of the Renton High School has been designed to serve only limited functions—as a dropoff area and as a short-term parking area for building visitors and persons of disability. All parking spaces will be restricted to those uses at all times. This parking area is not an emulation of"strip-style" commercial development parking that the City of Renton is admirably attempting to curtail. See Hearing Examiner Conclusion No. 12. [32012-0805/SB993340.185] -4- 12/2/99 The Planning Commission and the City Council approved a "P-suffix" overlay zone that applies to Renton High School and other Renton School District properties. However, the P-suffix overlay development standards include only relief from the height restrictions of the underlying zone, because of the focus on residential zones. The approved P-suffix overlay zone did not address the issue of maximum setback requirements in the CD zone and how it would adversely affect School District properties—even though allowing the School District the same development standard flexibility as it had previously enjoyed under Public Use was the clear intention during the process, as evidenced in numerous correspondence and meeting minutes. Renton High School is a unique public facility that happens to be located in the CD zone. The CD development standards overly restrict what the School District may reasonably do to improve its property, in direct contradiction of the assurances the School District received during the rezone process. In such a situation, a variance to rectify the problem is fully justified, but the Hearing Examiner granted it with a significant condition that undermines major School District objectives in seeking the variance. The small parking area is essential to the School District objectives in its modernization and improvement project for Renton High School. Such a parking area was permitted under the previous development standards and should be permitted for the same public facility now. F. The proposed small parking area is consistent with adjacent areas within the Downtown Core Area that have no maximum front setback requirement. The Downtown Core Area overlay zone that modifies certain development standards of the underlying zone for properties located within the area. RMC 4-2- 120C(15). One modification is that there is no maximum front setback requirement for properties zoned CD that are located within the Downtown Core Area. RMC 4-2- 120B. Other properties within the CD zone, such as the Renton High School, are subject to a maximum front setback. The Downtown Core Area designation abuts the Renton High School property on the east and on the south. If the high school property had been included in the Core Area, it would not have needed the setback variance and the small parking area would have been allowed. Therefore, the small parking area should be allowed as part of the granted setback variance for fairness and consistency with the privileges of the surrounding properties. [32012-0805/SB993340.1851 -6- 12/2/99 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. County of King ) MARILYN MOSES ,being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and states: That on the 18th day of November ,1999, affiant deposited in the mail of the United States a sealed envelope(s) containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. Signature: C- C2 C • SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this / 6 p day of A.011 , .1999: 7 L*QA/V1A 14 (1( 421-(q. Notary Public i and for the State of Washington, residing at - , therein. Application, Petition, or Case No.: Renton High School Modernization LUA99-120,SA-H,V The Decision or Recommendation contains a complete list of the Parties of Record. NOTES RECEIPT DATE lain/ q9 P NO. 4 4 2 0 p RECEIVED FROM ` �RR IWS �OT E U_ ADDRESS Java 3rd /We 40ki El ;Pa tti-e WA q?lbI $ Dv FOR Appal LUA- 9R— tao AMT.OP CASH el*#bo Ltg a3 ACCOUNT AMT.PAID CHECK 16 OD BALANCE MONEY BY /14 i'Jj m 4 h vt DUE ORDER 01899 RFDI.FORM®eL8o2 APPEAL November 18, 1999 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION APPLICANT: Renton School District Renton High School Modernization File No.: LUA-99-120,SA-H,V-H LOCATION: 400 S 2nd Street SUMMARY OF REQUEST: To modernize Renton High School, and to construct 16,500 square foot performing arts center. The proposal also requires approval of two variances. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Development Services Recommendation: Approve with conditions DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REPORT: The Development Services Report was received by the Examiner on October 19, 1999 PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Development Services Report,examining available information on file with the application, field checking the property and surrounding area;the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The following minutes are a summary of the October 26, 1999 hearing. The legal record is recorded on tape. The hearing opened on Tuesday,October 26, 1999,at 10:05 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of the Renton City Hall. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing the original Exhibit No.2: Vicinity map application,proof of posting,proof of publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No.3: Site plan Exhibit No.4: Landscape plan Exhibit No. 5: South building elevation Exhibit No.6: Southeast-northwest building elevation Exhibit No. 7: North building elevation Exhibit No. 8: East building elevation The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by PETER ROSEN,Project Manager,Development Services,City of Renton, 1055 S Grady Way,Renton,Washington 98055. The applicant seeks site plan approval for the modernization of the existing Renton High School,and construction of a new Performing Arts Center(PAC). The 25-acre campus is located in the downtown area and is surrounded by residential and Renton School District Renton High School Modernization File No.: LUA-99-120,SA-H,V-H November 18, 1999 Page 2 commercial zoning. The proposed project is to demolish the east wing of building A,the main high school building,and replace it with the new PAC. That is the only change in the existing footprint of the buildings on the site. Building A would be subject to significant modernization to the interior. Building B,north of Building A,would undergo minimal modernization to interior mechanical and electrical systems. Building C would be a conversion of classrooms to a central warehouse facility. In building A there is an existing boiler room with a smoke stack which will be removed. There will be changes in circulation and parking on the site. It is proposed that a current driveway west of the main building will be closed to through traffic,and a new bus access and related loading area will be constructed off Logan Avenue northeast of building A. There will also be an expanded parking area on the east boundary of the site which will have access from S 2nd as well as from Logan Avenue. A new visitor short-term parking and drop-off area is proposed off S 2nd south of the PAC. The proposal requires two variances from development standards of the Center Downtown(CD)zone. The PAC would exceed the maximum front yard street setback of 25 feet for buildings over 25 feet in height. The PAC would be set back approximately 82 feet from S 2nd Street. In addition the zone requires a minimum 10 foot wide landscape strip along street frontages. The existing strip is 10 feet in width,but the property line bisects it with 5 feet on the school site property and 5 feet in the right-of-way. The code requires a 10 foot onsite landscape strip. The Renton School District conducted an environmental review of the project and issued a Determination of Non-Significance,with no mitigation measures imposed. No appeals were filed. The Comprehensive Plan designation for this site is Center Downtown(CD)and the policies do not specifically address schools or performing arts centers. However,the proposal is consistent with the goals and objectives of the downtown element such as revitalizing an urban center. The PAC is intended to be available to the community as well as serve as a school auditorium. In addition,the modernization of the high school will secure the school's presence at this location,and it serves as a buffer between the more intensive commercial uses of downtown and the residential neighborhoods. The development standards of the CD zone such as lot coverage,building height and parking have been met. Front yard setback and landscaping requirements have not been met and are the subject of variance requests. The Zoning Administrator determined that the landscape setback requirements along the north and northwest portions of the site do not apply as they are unaffected by this proposal. Existing on-site parking is 289 spaces. The proposal would add 167 spaces,for a total of 456 parking spaces. The applicant has asked for a parking modification because the number of proposed spaces exceeds the required number of parking spaces. The modernization/renovation of the school is not expected to adversely impact surrounding uses. The proposal would change the existing bus and vehicular circulation patterns,particularly to the east of the site. The applicant is proposing a 10 foot wide landscape strip consisting of deciduous shade trees and shrubs between the parking area and the abutting residences. Staff is recommending a condition that the applicant revise the plan to provide better visual screening. The applicant is also proposing removal of several large redwood trees in front of the entry of building A. Staff would urge the applicant to preserve these large trees if possible. Staff is recommending approval of the modernization project, subject to the condition that the applicant shall revise the landscape plantings along the east property boundary to provide better visual screening between the parking area and the abutting single family residences. Regarding the variance requests,the applicant requests a variance from the maximum front yard setback of 25 feet. The PAC is proposed to be set back 82 feet from the front property line. Both the existing high school Renton School District Renton High School Modernization File No.: LUA-99-120,SA-H,V-H November 18, 1999 Page 3 building and the east wing which the PAC is replacing exceed the maximum setback. The PAC building would be located closer to the front property line than the existing building,thus decreasing the level of non- conformity. The applicant also requests a variance from the 10 foot wide landscape requirement strip along S 2nd Street. Currently five feet of the landscape strip is within the City's right-of-way with an adjacent sidewalk. In order to comply with the code,the applicant would be required to move the entire existing sidewalk along the entire frontage of the property and replace it with landscaping. Staff feels that this requirement is incommensurate with the project proposal and would pose a hardship upon the applicant. Mr. Rosen detailed the variance criteria which the applicant must meet,including undue hardship,detrimental affect upon public,granting of a special privilege,and whether the proposal is a minimum variance. Staff concluded that the granting of the variances was appropriate and that the applicant met the required criteria. Guv Overman,Northwest Architectural Company,2201 6th Avenue,#1405, Seattle,Washington 98121, applicant representative herein,elaborated on the facade development of the design, including the historical style, integration of the new design and the current condition of the structure. It is being recommended that the redwood trees located at the front entry be removed as they are overgrown and putting significant pressure against the foundation. The seismic upgrade of the facade could also be compromised by these trees. Mr.Overman described the different traffic patterns and parking requirements for the facility. Regarding the variance requests,Mr. Overman explained the orientation of the PAC to the site and other adjacent uses. The orientation of the PAC to the school and the architectural features of the new complex would be disrupted by maintaining the required maximum setback of 25 feet. The removal of the smoke stack and the ultimate height of the building were discussed,as well as the landscaping buffers located on the eastern portion of the site. Betty Nokes,Economic Development Director,City of Renton, 1055 S Grady Way,Renton,Washington 98055, spoke regarding the PAC and its importance to the community. One of the goals was to tie it to a joint use with the school, and the design of the building and the landscaping had received good public support. Arneta Henninger,Development Services,City of Renton, 1055 S Grady Way,Renton,Washington 98055, responded that a water main extension may be required,but it will be handled in the plan review process. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 11:40 a.m. FINDINGS,CONCLUSIONS&DECISION Having reviewed the record in this matter,the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant,Renton School District, filed a request for approval of a Site Plan for school renovation together with a variance from setback provisions and a variance from landscape provisions. 2. The yellow file containing the staff report,the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA)documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit#1. Renton School District Renton High School Modernization File No.: LUA-99-120,SA-H,V-H November 18, 1999 Page 4 3. The Renton School District assumed lead agency status for this proposal and issued a Determination of Non-Significance(DNS)for the subject proposal. 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5. The subject site is located at 400 South 2nd Street. The site is the location of Renton High School. The subject site is located on the north side of South 2nd. It is bounded by Logan Avenue South on the east, South Tobin Street on the north and Lake Avenue South on the west. 6. The subject site is part of the original townsite of the City of Renton. 7. The subject site is zoned CD(Center Downtown). 8. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of urban core uses,but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the Plan. The plan does call for revitalizing the urban center of the City. 9. The entire campus is approximately 25.84 acres and includes a variety of campus buildings on the center and east portions of the site and the ball fields on the north and west portions of the site. 10. There are a number of aspects to the modernization proposal. Some of the changes will be external and visible while others will be interior to existing buildings or generally not visible. The applicant proposes demolishing the existing east wing attached to Building A,the original high school building, replacing it with a new dual purpose performing arts center and auditorium. The exterior of the original building will be restored with tuckpointing,etc.,and the boiler building and tall smokestack would be removed and replaced by a new vocational wing. They will be modifying the interior of Building B (gymnasium and food service commons)and Building C(vocational complex). The applicant proposes changes to the traffic circulation and parking configuration. The applicant will also equip the site to support possible portable structures if student population requires them in the future. 11. The most prominent change will be the removal of the existing east wing and its replacement by the 16,500 square foot Performing Arts Center. This component will be attached to the main building by a narrow,one-story corridor. The performance center will be aligned with the front of the existing high school building. The building will be positioned so that it is angled to the normal front facade line. It will be diamond shaped in contrast to the main building. It will have articulations and a complex and varied roofline. The finish will match the"gothic revival"appearance of the original building. A new clock tower will be added to the new vocational wing and should be visible to the rear and between the main building and performance center. 12. The new portable pads will be located to the west of main building and east of ball fields. They will be placed in the area of the old through driveway that bisected the site in a north to south direction. There will be four pads with two north and two south of the centerline of the site. 13. The new student and event parking area and a circulation-separated school bus access lot will be located east of the performance center. The parking area will contain 203 parking stalls. It will be V-shaped, following the angled lines of the performance center. It will have an access from S 2nd at its southeast corner. A second access will be at its northeast corner off of Logan. This second entrance will also provide the ingress and egress driveway for the looped bus drop-off lot. Renton School District Renton High School Modernization File No.: LUA-99-120,SA-H,V-H November 18, 1999 Page 5 14. The CD zone permits buildings to be 95 feet high or 110 feet if zoned with a P-suffix which the site has. The proposed changes will have a maximum height of 56 feet. None of the additions will exceed the height of the existing structure. There will be a variety of roof heights across the campus with clock tower and gables and dormers on the performance center. Height limits are subject to review by the FAA since the campus is located in the Renton Airport's flight corridor. It does not appear that the new construction will intrude into the protected slope corridor. As noted, a taller smokestack will be removed. 15. The existing complex is served by 289 parking stalls. The applicant proposes adding 167 stalls mainly east of the performance center. The complex would have a total of 456 stalls. Staff has calculated that the proposal would require 240 stalls for design capacity. The arts center requires 138 stalls. Staff noted that the arts center and the rest of the complex probably will not have overlapping parking needs, meaning the arts center generally would function when the school is not in session. Providing excess parking requires administrative review. The Public Works Director has yet to rule on the deviation from parking standards. 16. Staff noted that the parking on the east abuts residential uses located along Logan Avenue. Deciduous trees and shrubs were proposed. While the zoning in that area is CD, staff recommended that they be protected from noise impacts by additional fencing and landscaping and the applicant agreed to bolster efforts along the eastern boundary of the subject site. 17. The applicant proposes altering circulation patterns to separate passenger vehicles from school bus arrivals and departures. The interior roadway west of the main building will be divided ending the existing through-circulation. Buses will now arrive and enter and exit a closed loop accessed from Logan. Buses will generally not be parked on campus. 18. Staff has recommended that the large Redwood trees that flank the entrance to the main building be retained if possible. The applicant proposes removing those trees since they would make work on the front of the building more difficult and appear to be placing pressure on the foundation. 19. The southernmost point on the facade of the proposed arts center would be aligned with the current main building. It would be set back 82 feet from the street. The CD Zone requires buildings to be set back not more than 25 feet from the property line. The intent is to avoid strip commercial development where the parking becomes the foreground and the commercial facades are removed from pedestrian paths. The east wing that would be demolished actually exceeds the required setback by even more. 20. The applicant has applied for a variance to allow the new arts center to be set back more than 25 feet from the front property line to integrate it into the campus design. The proposed setback would be 82 feet. 21. The code requires properties in the CD zone to provide ten(10)feet of landscaping along street frontages. The applicant proposes to maintain the existing landscaping and sidewalk arrangement. Currently five feet of the existing landscaping is located on the subject site and five feet is located on the public right-of-way. A sidewalk is located interior to this landscaping on the applicant's property. The applicant has applied for a variance to allow the current landscaping and sidewalk arrangement to continue as it is. If the landscaping were provided as required,the sidewalk would have to be relocated at the curb line. Renton School District Renton High School Modernization File No.: LUA-99-120,SA-H,V-H November 18, 1999 Page 6 22. A number of administrative determinations were made regarding the campus. Since most of the external changes were concentrated along the south and east portions,the administrator found that the landscaped rear yard provisions of the Code were not applicable along the north boundary of the subject site. A fifteen foot visual buffer is required where a commercial property abuts a residentially zoned property. This occurs on the northwest corner of the subject site where the sports field is located. Since no changes were proposed to this area of the site,the administrator found the provision inapplicable. Normally, buildings adjacent to a residential zone may be 20 feet taller than the height permitted in that residential zone. There is residential zoning along north boundary of the site. The administrator found the provision is not applicable to buildings not abutting the north property line. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The site plan ordinance provides a number of specific criteria for reviewing a site plan. Those criteria are generally represented in part by the following enumeration: a. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; b. Conformance with the Building and Zoning Codes; c. Mitigation of impacts on surrounding properties and uses; d. Mitigation of the impacts of the proposal on the subject site itself; e. Conservation of property values; f. Provision for safe and efficient vehicle and pedestrian circulation; g. Provision of adequate light and air; h. Adequacy of public services to accommodate the proposed use; The proposed use satisfies these and other particulars of the ordinance. • 2. The Comprehensive Plan recommends this area for Center Downtown uses. While schools are not necessarily mentioned,they are permitted. In addition,the arts center is the type of use generally found in the urban core. It will be a new urban focal point that is compatible with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The proposed modernization generally complies with the Zoning Code regulations including height limits,proposed uses and most setbacks. As noted above,the applicant has applied for two variances from setback and landscape provisions. These issues will be discussed below. Compliance with Building and Fire Codes will be determined when a building permit is submitted. The buildings are being brought up to current codes. 4. The Zoning Administrator has found some landscape or setback provisions do not apply to the subject proposal due to the location of the majority of the work. In these areas,there will be no change to the external appearance or change in impacts. The development of the new parking and bus access areas along the east margin of the campus can have an impact on the residential uses located on the west side of Logan. While these properties are zoned for commercial uses in the main,they are developed primarily with residential uses deserving protection. The applicant's proposed deciduous landscaping Renton School District Renton High School Modernization File No.: LUA-99-120,SA-H,V-H November 18, 1999 Page 7 would not be sufficient to screen those uses,particularly in the evening hours when the arts center would be attracting patrons. The applicant shall be required to provide an evergreen landscaping theme along this margin of the site and erect a wall or fence that can buffer the uses located east of the site. 5. The proposed design carries over the Gothic Revival architecture of the original high school building. The design opens up the east side of the campus and provides a variety of visual elements including the very modulated and articulated arts center as well as the clock tower. The closing of the through-road located immediately west of the main building will also lessen the impacts on the subject site. The proposed removal of the Redwood trees will alter the focus around the main building,and the applicant should continue to explore methods of preserving those trees. Mature trees of this size and nature are hard to replace. 6. The development of the site will probably have an impact on the properties to the east of the site since traffic, including bus traffic,will be transferred to that area of the campus. This will be offset by the lessened impact on the properties north of the site where lessened bus traffic will result. 7. The new circulation patterns appear to be safe. They separate out the bus and general vehicular traffic. Pathways are provided for pedestrians through the parking areas and connecting to the school. 8. The campus buildings all observe reasonable setbacks from property lines or adjacent property. The way the arts center is attached to the main building,by a lowrise corridor, and the angular orientation of the arts center will permit light and air to reach more of the main building. 9. Adequate City infrastructure is available to serve the subject site and its new development. Variance to Exceed Required 25 Foot Front Yard Setback 10. Variances may be granted when the property generally satisfies all the conditions described in part below: a. The applicant suffers undue hardship caused by special circumstances such as:the size, shape,topography,or location where code enforcement would deprive the owner of rights and privileges enjoyed by others similarly situated; b. The granting of the variance would not materially harm either the public welfare or other property in the vicinity; c. The approval will not constitute a special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other property in the vicinity;and d. The variance is the minimum variance necessary to allow reasonable development of the subject site. The applicant's property appears ripe for the variance requested subject to eliminating the parking lot in front of the arts center. 11. The subject site's primary building,the High School building, is set back 82 feet from the street. It represents an earlier style of grand architecture where the building was set on an expansive lot. The building style is Gothic Revival. The building is a focal point with a large front lawn or open space Renton School District Renton High School Modernization File No.: LUA-99-120,SA-H,V-H November 18, 1999 Page 8 serving to accentuate the building. The building,its campus,and setback are unique. Preserving this tradition and the showcase to display this architecture requires that the building setback line of the new addition,the Performing Arts Center,match that of the existing building. Otherwise,the sweep of the front lawn terminates just east of the older building. The viewer's eye would be stopped dead by a building wall 57 feet closer to the street than the gothic edifice of the older building. A variance to maintain this tradition on the campus is appropriate. • 12. In this case,the purpose of the CD Zone's required maximum setback is to focus trade and commercial uses along the pedestrian and street frontage. It is intended to avoid strip style development where the building facade is separated from the street and sidewalks by parking. Moving the arts center to the rear and aligning it with the main building will not harm either the public or neighboring properties. But for the same reason the variance is appropriate to maintain this aura of gothic scale,the proposed parking at the front of the arts center is inappropriate. It contradicts and contravenes the spacious setting. It would replace the traditional sweeping lawn with a mix of parking lot,cars and landscaping. Of additional importance the variance avoids Zoning Code CD standards which are intended to not only pull buildings to the street but avoid parking immediately adjacent to the street. So to allow this building to violate the mandated 25 foot setback for valid architectural and design integrity reasons and then violate the spirit of the code and allow parking in this additional setback would be inappropriate. 13. While the goal of serving the front entrance of the main building with parking is intended to encourage use of the front entrance and appears congenial,the front entry can serve students,teachers or parents who arrive on foot or via transit. Since most of the parking for the arts center is located as close, if not closer,on the east of the new addition,reserved accessible or handicapped parking can be located in that eastern lot. In addition,more general parking is located west of the main building. It appears that it is located not much further from the front of the main school building than the proposed parking. In this day and age it seems unnecessary to encourage car use,and those who arrive by car can walk the short additional distances. If need be,the current drop-off lane could be improved or enhanced. 14. Approval of a variance for this very unique structure and campus will not create a special privilege. 15. The proposed parking pushes the variance limits and is not the minimum necessary for relief. The minimum is to provide a landscaped foreground that closely approximates that found in front of the main building. 16. In summary,the reason for this variance is based on the desire to match the generous,open setback on the original building for the new architecturally similar arts center;to allow the grand architectural Gothic Revival style to be viewed as it was meant to be viewed-across an expansive open space. The parking lot is intrusive and it appears to defeat the basis of the variance. It alters substantially the viewscape. It defeats the mirroring of the lawn and open space found in front of the main building. Further, it introduces front yard parking which is discouraged in the CD Zone. Variance from the South 2nd Street's 10 Feet of Landscaping 17. The criteria are the same as found above in Conclusion 10. The applicant's property appears ripe for the variance requested although the elimination of the parking lot may permit additional landscaping to meet code. 18. The unusual juxtaposition of the applicant's lot line,the public street and the location of the existing sidewalk and landscaping create a hardship. There is already ten feet of landscaping,although five feet Renton School District Renton High School Modernization File No.: LUA-99-120,SA-H,V-H November 18, 1999 Page 9 are located on the public right-of-way and five feet are on the applicant's property. Relocating the sidewalk would mean moving it closer to the street. There would be less intervening landscaping or a smaller parking strip to buffer pedestrians from road traffic. In addition,currently,the"public sidewalk" is located on the applicant's site which is also unusual. It appears the applicant accommodated pedestrians prior to the City installing sidewalks in this area. 19. Approving the variance will not harm the public nor other property in the vicinity. The total landscaping will be 10 feet as required by code,only it is not entirely provided on the subject site. The applicant has ceded its property for a public walkway and in turn can benefit from landscaping on the public right-of-way. 20. Due to the location of the sidewalk on the applicant's property already,it would not grant the applicant a special privilege. 21. As indicated above, if the parking lot proposed for the front of the arts center is eliminated,this variance may be unnecessary. The variance would allow development of the subject site with a safe sidewalk location and adequate landscaping. 22. In conclusion, in the main the proposal will both upgrade and extend the life of a unique and beloved institution,the Renton High School,while adding a valuable addition to the cultural life of the City. As noted,the variances appear justified but subject to eliminating the parking lot in front of the arts center and adjusting the landscaping as reasonable. DECISION: The Site Plan and Variances are approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall eliminate the parking area in front of the arts center addition and may add or enhance a dropoff lane along the curb subject to review and approval of the City. 2. The applicant shall be required to provide an evergreen landscaping theme along the east margin of the site and erect or enhance a wall or fence that can buffer the uses located east of the subject site. 3. The applicant shall continue to explore methods of preserving the Redwood trees that currently provide a focus around the entrance to the main building. ORDERED THIS 18th day of November, 1999. \(0_4_t_ FRED J. KAU MAN HEARING E R TRANSMITTED THIS 18th day of November, 1999 to the parties of record: Peter Rosen Guy Overman Betty Nokes 1055 S Grady Way 2201 6th Avenue,#1405 1055 S Grady Way Renton,WA 98055 Seattle, WA 98121 Renton, WA 98055 Renton School District Renton High School Modernization File No.: LUA-99-120,SA-H,V-H November 18, 1999 Page 10 Arneta Henninger Renton School District Dr. Bruce Williams 1055 S Grady Way Attn: Jack Connell 128 Rainier Avenue S Renton,WA 98055 1220 N 4th Renton,WA 98055 Renton,WA 98055 TRANSMITTED THIS 18th day of November, 1999 to the following: Mayor Jesse Tanner Gregg Zimmerman,Plan/Bldg/PW Admin. Members, Renton Planning Commission Jana Hanson,Development Services Director Chuck Duffy,Fire Marshal Sue Carlson,Econ. Dev. Administrator Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Larry Meckling,Building Official Transportation Systems Division Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer Utilities System Division Councilperson Kathy Keolker-Wheeler South County Journal Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 15 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m.,December 2, 1999. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure,errors of law or fact,error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen(14)days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant,and the Examiner may, after review of the record,take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV,Chapter 8, Section 16,which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk,accompanying a filing fee of$75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department,first floor of City Hall. If the Examiner's Recommendation or Decision contains the requirement for Restrictive Covenants,the executed Covenants will be required prior to approval by City Council or final processing of the file. You may contact this office for information on formatting covenants. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte(private one-on-one)communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. • 7. k'r \0 9 iy Y•ili fir.,'' 'itts �,____ �.If •, ,. ^•� I,A1144 ' F4.1, ' �,•fi „....,,. t+ , p• •�.:: '�•,i I a SLq�• ••• M =ik ',.. '9, i( VO tl . '070......_ • ;01.. ...-.•\>.jtig•,s,-.1.,w lot 1 •: JI 1 I� of . `! { ESQil Tfr i `na,,._Iz ii 5 .......„ ,0, ALs .. Fj1;0 � ;{ ile =N 4t114 IEy d'r i ,� 7F" ,el•Qo/, 1'M!!rl•VC:i y•I ilr& t'_:,.i710P O. +f ezr �!}} rzli irk ,l-i' •,�°,., '` .:�3''h•+4 i �.lir �4 •'r• ,\off ®- +lj!!-I:;p1 i.." d':t ti • i"4 rdRT , . �..�.... /. a :�• ..0, f' y7w}.y F7 I ' I I I V/I I,., .Z r r 1 1 1 � �j{� r j t }'I'tttrt ;(f}�PIiI ['� Imo(' ,ai ..t( i i; L iii —II 1 , f, Aw It'd a :s. "\.ii _ -- —_ —__' I I�T■iI If' I' , tinlifill pill ill a c e l:-,: . �� • I i � - a.a .. . a £ = i'::,,m �t "', ascx max, sa xav�-f x.� _ - ,. ,,: ,` _El. n C1 Cif' 1. 1 ;P.1 tk i.if ii,:1 .,,,q tte,irsit---te-121.- 1 ii „.. n -,1 ,„ ,...t.:;;.e.,:ti 111111111111111401 I€{ rifri{►(i(r(j �I ;�� ;� iii!L...,.::::::...;.,.::,,,:., ti II, I; l _ `D - ;1,at { t t a � __IrTil I e� :�..{t[ fflit ,ij tI(r, �' r .. r � Y >. :.%ti.,.,. ,., ❖ 1 1 . tf!/ I ii t,la2pn , ♦V'.•'' •.•.♦ ''.:ak .�.�] 11T�I (' .a. .' jll 4: �j1 5::�eiwo yy- i I• �� I• II /1 ;'!, V' fh, i i4 I I gi4. '1 III II �U!•� y `� . 1 111 sA5 '''''11...111.4"\ Iiii:: i 17;`1{', . i • , -1 :,:�°fat :,{?':'w`.:• 'Iv° a F I17t11 gyp, • t e '. -.Ai.'$;3,: :•; I�+ — 1 ;1:0 1 i i ., 1,7; 0, ., '' lik ! I It' \\ i a I i \ \s �• .•� �\C i 7 z , , i ,- ... ,,(f).„4-e...,,,,- -.7A, ,, _ : CD pp J . I� `,.s•+ J -1 `'lam ae (j/. 71'I \;\\��, I . 1 fl 0 s i�q^ ,j., ... - I III ! ;:"I �)I\ ���� - n� 5 r?�'.'. I I LQI ! I II},Ifl I_III!_!:nll !II! IL!( -".,1", ' y; —r---1 I •It! I j 1 i I I I I , I I �I :�:i e+ j -0 8 I I I f I �s 1I� f I I I I I I I , .�� I I f I I , w,a �. I .so I I I 1 1 I �� 4`i1'0 i I I f I I 6i i° I D g L__1 -� J I f- I ILoGAN-AVE---LS'::'I � "----1• •ww a.• 1 L li ill!! ,.a scwoa..mr...•.nw i r I {E�'`. Fi h�, RENTC IH SCHOOL We : -"''"' PLAN APPROVAL SET O 2 & I! RENTON ,11.DISTRICT#400 it ?.I a I\ � a.tow..•s .rto C � '� •R eavuaoN• • 1031 1 w e .. -w,1L4 7:1_4 I-1F I 'L An PHomant �mr.m..r .an:srrr i ICE` • E. r �'� ��'lll I ! 00© h!9111UI,1��ii'ii i ]IIIllilp�d�l �ioi.'i�llq'p lllll!���ll II IIII II1 III �� ii II' i!�I 0 —� 0 s 1V <J UL l ju 'UV 1 I UW�q 69oaDCoa r1ei;.. ;tI {;. r ` ?e{f��r ',fcx:r ..r-,,+,rr' r is .w � �a r r r• y^fi i �Y ©0© 11f1111111 if1.1111111 11111111E � �� F ' ®I�,® . • - n E,I1. F •„.-Jr.f;;-.2.._\ f IrIn:iI.i.ffi—.11_a7,•a.1J. r 00 . E pIlil r�rl ii II 1E I1 11 r 3 a ® ` REMTOH NIBN 54NOOL 11 1 111 E. I]. 11 Il li 1-1. ...m m _ _ .�^pp°�gp�q�. t d E .--, g .1 �11 Jl 8 "....7i.1.=-...I 1p....4•, - �..� 00 00 00I 00 00 00 00 M... oa o0 00 00 00 00 00 . . _. II J! 1Li! y „}l - • ,o°Oo o�°U 0 , .;I7 it i .1 i11 ;I I.. , ;i r I. f1' OSOUTH ELEVATION ', s<d. t/A'.t'-0' • • MINK.PO.HoVN •99Ba11111111111111111181111111111IIIIIVQ1111111298111NII11Wd1111P ll"rt .t1. 'r'.r tfit. . Y „7r • Y:r:r}Elff+late rt.� r • J 12./g %7litq j �hr10r2 Up J�I�J lrrr �f}r�rr !llrr�t/jJJ fr�rrrrrr++r rJyy'r7r��.jjl rr!lrrlll t rr O dr r.t5Mr.5r r r ,.r lr..! rf:rr.r!' r rp.MA fh 11� l'h#.1 rr ltF ft l!0 '., 7lt r itr i 1 at. !1,larrtre,,,Y.. .: 0 V J?�N ;.r +fF�rr' 'T'ri i.!r_ .• rF?i' ` urrrri'rrrri�li�lr?rllri.•r4 u:v., �iilrr?i^iYb�thtrrrntr rifrrrdrlllf+iiri!rr r��l7trtr .�Yr`5 u Jjl ��. _cc sirir.r� ii �'l#r! f N m �f}�I ' rrri —.1 rl 1a '°� - .v w Y 5 :hSY U!- co ^ rS.As'. �-: 1 :14,4 xv r nii*X.}y,-.?' ;r. :g:r::.c.;.:;n.r., f,-�9r• to rr r r rr r r+�•ra4. , { 5s•v �r' ' '• , § ,- rrr hrtrrlrl',+r�ft•Nfkri{41 ' }'r' < ,tiw F.: }4 r} r,,dii,641)00 fi fer' '. •, •'E:: �4x ! F f.E rtri Ft r. J...r ks is1/4 A 4 ' ij•rgrr i rr.rz2 f.• _;i t.:> _ __ c" . r tr r ri tr r3 s -j. :rt Jr l rrt try ru �.::..f: 3•. x €s ' ,.,.; s:::: sx?�_.___ [' s rrrr !}jrrsJr3.rlrs ; S ?t r-Art\ -- .•rrsrr.rr.,«r �3 r:-r ;. sr l ?'0''4:r:.'P •'.r! ! .r. ti O �r ,!' J z .r. �Jtr. +.:s�s' .a:: � i � t; f it!! ri, �:�r� r ii .r��f.Q'11�r ��' i i !.rt, P i::.P.:. .r.. •r, .F.r �la II .� r _� w::= :E:r _, ilt r. z :r -r• ® it1IllIb i �r ;whit, 'i. �,�•: w r,f. a irr EII E in- r ill 6 ii Y. O r Evi _. f lire -- i. l �oo ''s 711111 1 :. `i S€#:::it ;Es;37:�.j}i:>:' :i4•:•;'a:,:> v....: I 00 00 i — 7-. - -I i K®N i :i ti ..... ■ae=.we � E tip :..:g pi) 1� �:....:E::::. :::. i� .t yiii ll nrna rne.MO WHOM fcca r•_. WI O N '"�'� •.r„7F"'..�, ffrmna Nm• • arv.-fff_con• Y ��' fufros taw•o,Efu } ,2 SOUTH ELEVATION Sc t/e'.I'-o' MATERIALS LEGEND im i« i,n E': R•i-_m - .rNW to.ottS .W 9-98092 «rt ElLvt ,,: 5, ...�. L, ii If �K,.�9 „A }}{ • 9wo v, D-16-99 SNOW ,.inxc..vauf • • ELEVATIONS 1 ,REVISIONS qrr tirffh ilk r r r + 7 rr r r 7Xrrf'{JlTflif l !rid. r jj fitJ;ri 4l iyiii,w• kt rN�� r' g rrfi fil[ li ii i r�1+f`'+J l7rlf Jr itl l�fjjT fjl l rf ijyififjrrlr i+ r r{}+rr+, 1'fr11F r�« IIN '' I,, '' •e S.S y r :•.:AVIVC d.ViY:h7Yt:','_• r'.,....�..,:r. ..., niY e _- -- � 55��^..i','-5yrr:.. �1 2{�h N •'� r'•tiUOPf qy�,� , -_�• r• :lRr:"f'r•. _ ir rti ::¢ns v wri:il r.•xli..ivl� p"'j r< it w a: A. — �i flik ..:32:2X.2;iiii+: !ss : '' ::} x� •{i. :}�-- E: ° f,� _ --f{!i?�:(l�ff���'~:ril'" .--r'° ° r!w :r s ~Ak: r,:}k:..r� :`3: in, —. _._ — - >0 Hi:ilr= 's~ tiff:ter 24.4:: -;.4vs;a ni.. • _ r.. r r '.gi L, r. s yr iv y:}:=:if.` F r f ral 7eXi ' p '®®® 1::J L '�� 'i R:..9f trf r.mir— -- 2.~ � +4 r:,r» .rr is# • r K $14 r r }}� .,,t s < MOE . ••Ill 34 ti 11if 21•r } • Ii rr9J7'rrtr`r-llr4 lri rt ?r. rrlirfi{frzFrfiifr TPii Ifi+t:rr �,'r ®®n !hill ! ® p>-: .IN �, k r,r�p,yrf7,::. 4 J ))� it 1�0:_ aFj jrf�� 99999N F k;.,k 1. ::ui •-. ::'••!•- k�x $.2 d„.yE it , T xIlli !.#k:: ,,,. ..�', a "c� 22„ .?<:E 'Tt.".`% r y4 .¢ii dY:.j' N ,r :#. rii"a,•' 'a § ?i s�' r ��. li�:j::0.E: <y:�:�•i'�>.<�E :i..,<:..: i s uE'' .fa 'R+�< 4.>j:'�3� i..k �.<, .xk;y #s� ':F �:I .,•3!:,;! o i'°Q . `t,:-• a e,6 #c oil k ,$ ,10 .. , .x#!#.:�`: r.2.#.a,.,�s,j;> %r s•. ' 7 .. ...r <^4�: ZY a•, :�.< .E. c�, .!s re+01i iigilil0�:7!:'.''d I. 3!,: y 32:,.�-r:. x## �- - .:<-_ .. s,- ._ M q .� ..<. .... .: ,2.w,; .¢� ). .'2:: •`£EE !•'�> <:Sinoa iz?i :':. vz < # : sus '.3:x -. .. !` _ ag":: a dT•'x>;; ( y %9.<:E. ::f.^x:E x' %:::' C x 3 f Sh#!: girim gp� ... . .. .. .. .. • ., i :E¢:. .vsF!:: i!>�.y<<p.i:�l��y:. .y# ,..?kr�ii:!xif,'i!:�!,�•' k:•J./y: . .. .. .• .:- .real:,. 'S!:i�":•'�.�. R?,.w...>�:-. ! .. .ii • • • 0 NORTH ELEVATION xi.. r/e--E'-o• III it le I ill!, II HI li . . ......s... 0._ .,„ �l .‘ , . 8 _o • ❑ I®i ixrrr j? fi rw1a lTr jRt l tY f _ = o , 3;»i><;';jr€�•j- :g 35;^"yia7.,?..,'.s!::S"...9i l':3YE!'::'Y E>2£` 3!:Y;:t£i(�EE;iF i'�£#£ -- <_ f — _ X S w gg :::.!..`:;.i°.::'t s2k:',!;YE3� f<,. ! ':`sEx,.. . s .>.`. , >..''r... S!: -r -,' �` �«� �.• fix. xt�y ei .� ' 11. .11. ,11 . O NORTH ELEVATION - MATERIALS LEGENDSUM IP, n•<�. nu iiy.••••?;!i{i n"ew wa MOO 2-98092 rh: morn w aEV-] .•r 9-19-99 • MOM :r,...«M,"."•„.9014 ...,.. r-v-,. A frrr>r.^ 3 +.�>�........ ELEVATIONS SCALE:Ur-r-0• teltAA P1(-° 4100 �� CITY OF i�.ENTON ��� INVOICE DATE ACCOUNT INVOICE CUSTOMER REF PAYMENT DUE FOR INFORMATION CALL 10/14/99 r10-0056 009313 11/18/99 PW Dev Svc- (425) 430-7283 RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 403 For Your Informal; Facilities & Operations 1220 N 4TH ST RENTON, WA 98055 DESCRIPTION AMOUNT LUA 99-120 Variances (2) for Renton High School Hearing Examiner variances to allow performing arts center to be located beyond the maximum front/street setback and to allow less than 10' of landscaping along the street. PO #94399 Total amount due: 500.00 F0RM3127 10/94 PLEASE REFERENCE INVOICE NUMBER WITH PAYMENT Finance Department • 200 Mill Ave. S. • Renton, Washington 98055 di I I 4101° CITY OF:RENTON• i CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION ;! AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the r day of OOcXobe.1r' , 1999, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing �r�Y tie a,nw� tRkownntvuu - documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing .3a(--t, Cott\ae-k1 "Qe.V.�Y‘ Sc� 0 IS�VICr+ d V evvvkn_in Ro\rt-V\w e St" f cArti+e W. (Signature of Sender) 5-Cl Ad-K(.-‘4- Se- - STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for thees and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Notary Public i and for the State of W s ton ?;., NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF WASHINGTON Notary (Print) MARILYN KAMCHEFF COMMISSION EXPIRES My appointment MfitfigOINTMENT EXPIRES:6-29-03 JUI IE 29, 2003 Project Name: ReN\ov\ " .8‘n Sc-kitooI YVVodeirvtit9.tto-in Project Number: Lv . 9`t o IZOI S R -I4 , E(e NOTARY.DOC City of Renton PUBLIC Department of Planning/Building/Public Works HEARING PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: Public Hearing Date: October 19, 1999 Project Name: Renton High School Modernization AA plicant/ Renton School District ddress: Capital Projects Office Attn: Jack Connell 1220 N. 4` Street Renton, WA. 98055 Owner/ Renton School District Address: Capital Projects Office 1220 N. 4` Street Renton, WA. 98055 File Number: LUA-099-120, SA-H, V-H Project Manager: Peter Rosen Project Description: Proposal for modernization of the existing Renton High School. The existing east wing of Building 'A' would be removed for construction of a new 16,500 square foot Auditorium/Performing Arts Center (PAC). There would be extensive interior modernization of the principal school building, Building "A". The project would include systems upgrades and minor alterations to the Gymnasium/Food Service Commons building, Building "B". The existing Vocational building at the north end of the site may be used for interim classrooms during construction, but would be utilized for central warehouse/food storage after completion of the project. The proposal requires approval of two (2) variances from development standards of the Center Downtown (CD) zone. The proposed Performing Arts Center would exceed the maximum front yard/street setback of 25 feet for buildings over 25 feet in height. The applicant also requests variance approval from the minimum 10-foot wide landscape strip required along streets. Project Location: py 400 S. 2nd Street }�FQ , I -p. . . ,ICi Y OFITO4CIPORT d i _ $!,: i :}}-,- It 1 � 4 ,� i -�sfir•Jp�IY�%�t1si!�.,�a��.t�6y,,fG�{4:�it�",� i,f•«.•• �Ct + t 1— d. '� �LOE� � m2� C{,ii11 I,j� ; '-' 1 - ." El 1/.4 ' 'L3 r ---=[I'M - '‘-‘,, Ir4334f4E: ,.,: . •,j ' I!iiii, .ri•i;71 Y�'� J ai • [. + ". b st r•arp:ACEN 4A'•a9:411 !'E7nw�tR,�; m ..1:7;:f\ E/. , rip :eV,..e.t,.....gt,l/Imo'TEM ' 4T 'p _.- w:.t.a�'i'i. -rt..-� -: of iL' L $ .te . ...' ,..:4 '7.,-14- ji • 0,,.. ,, , '"'"•-•c:,t---, . ,1":. .41- •itek..71,1 f 10,ii "it:; riZa. ,.7,,,,,,: %.,",„,,,- - X - . .' a/ � ®kl y l � r. :221 i11 0F a F3P L -i.. .7' I ' I� 3- ;'•l i I F .Ole City of Renton P/B/PW Department . .;liminary Report to the Hearing Examiner RENTON HIGH SCHOOL MODERNIZATION LUA-99-120, SA-H, V-H PUBLIC HEARING DATE: OCTOBER 26, 1999 Page 2 of 10 B. GENERAL INFORMATION: I. Owner of Record: Renton School District 2. Zoning Designation: Center Downtown (CD), Public Use Zone (P-1) 3. • Comprehensive Plan Center Downtown Land Use Designation: 4. Existing Site Use: High School 5. Neighborhood Characteristics: North: Single family residential, Office, Multi-family residential East: Single family residential, Commercial South: Commercial, Church, Multi-family residential West: Commercial 6. Access: S. 2nd Street, Logan Ave. S. 7. Site Area: 25.84 acres 8. Project Data: area comments Existing Building Area: 320,000 sq. ft. New Building Area: Total Building Area: 295,400 sq. ft. C. HISTORICAL/BACKGROUND: Action Land Use File No. Ordinance No. Date Annexation Incorporated 1901 Comprehensive Plan 4597 02/20/95 Zoning 4404 06/07/93 D. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE: 1. Center Downtown (CD) Use Table, Section 4-2-070M 2. Center Downtown (CD) Development Standards, Section 4-2-120B 3. Public Zone (P-1), Section 4-2-090 4. Site Plan Review, Section 4-9-200 Hexreport.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Jiminaty Report to the Hearing Examiner RENTON HIGH SCHOOL MODERNIZATION LUA-99-120, SA-H, V-H PUBLIC HEARING DATE: OCTOBER 26, 1999 Page 3 of 10 5. Variances, Section 4-9-250 E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: 1. Downtown Element F. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND Proposal for modernization of the existing Renton High School. Built and expanded in phases from 1931 through 1969, the high school is housed in several buildings on an existing campus adjacent to the Renton Central Business District. The proposed project would remove the existing east wing (the "Junior High") of Building 'A' for construction of a new Auditorium/Performing Arts Center (PAC). There would be extensive interior modernization of the principal school building, Building 'A.' The boiler building area (northeast corner of Building A) and the smokestack would be replaced with a new vocational education wing. The project would include systems upgrades and minor alterations to the Gymnasium/Food Service Commons building, Building 'B.' The existing Vocational building at the north end of the site may be used for interim classrooms during construction, but would be utilized for central warehouse/food storage after completion of the project. The proposal would revise existing access and parking areas. A new student and event parking area (203 parking spaces) would be developed in the east portion of the site. A new bus access and related loading area would also be constructed in this area of the site. A small visitor parking/drop off area would be added adjacent to the main school and Auditorium/Performing Arts Center. The existing road between the school and playfields would be utilized for separate parking areas at the north and south ends, eliminating through traffic. The proposal includes locations for four (4) future portable classrooms. Although it is not anticipated that the portables will ever be needed, the proposal includes underground communication and electrical connections as a contingency should enrollment exceed projections. The portable classrooms are located in the parking corridor to the west of the school buildings. The proposal requires approval of two (2) variances from development standards of the Center Downtown (CD) zone. The proposed Performing Arts Center would exceed the maximum front yard/street setback of 25 feet for buildings over 25 feet in height. The Performing Arts Center is setback approximately 82 feet from S. 2nd Street. The applicant also requests variance approval from the minimum 10-foot wide landscape strip required along streets. The proposal maintains the existing landscape strip along the S. 2nd Street frontage, which includes 5 feet of landscaping on the subject site and 5 feet, improved in the street right-of-way. 2. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Renton School District assumed lead agency status for conducting the environmental review of the proposal. The Renton School District issued a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) on August 27, 1999. The appeal period for the threshold determination ended on September 14, 1999. No appeals were filed. Hexreport.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department _liminary Report to the Hearing Examiner • RENTON HIGH SCHOOL MODERNIZATION LUA-99-120, SA-H, V-H PUBLIC HEARING DATE: OCTOBER 26, 1999 Page 4 of 10 3. COMPLIANCE WITH ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (SEPA) MITIGATION MEASURES Not applicable. No mitigation measures were imposed with the Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) issued for the project. 4. STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS Representatives from various city departments have reviewed the application materials to identify and address site plan issues from the proposed development. These comments are contained in the official file, and the essence of the comments has been incorporated into the appropriate sections of this report and the Departmental Recommendation at the end of the report. 5. CONSISTENCY WITH SITE PLAN APPROVAL CRITERIA Section 4-9-200.E. "The Hearing Examiner and City staff shall review and act upon site plans based upon comprehensive planning considerations and the following criteria. These criteria are objectives of good site plans to be aimed for in development within the City of Renton. However, strict compliance with any one or more particular criterion may not be necessary or reasonable. These criteria also provide a frame of reference for the applicant in developing a site, but are not intended to be inflexible standards or to discourage creativity and innovation. The site plan Review criteria include, but are not limited to, the following:" (5) GENERAL CRITERIA: (1) CONFORMANCE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, ITS ELEMENTS & POLICIES The subject site is located in the Center Downtown (CD) Comprehensive Plan designation. Policies of the Downtown Element do not specifically address schools or a Performing Arts Center. However, one of the Downtown Element Goals states: Foster the development of downtown into a revitalized urban center. The Performing Arts Center would serve the community as well as provide a school auditorium facility. The summary statement for the Downtown Element discusses encouraging an appropriate mix of uses and encouraging development at greater intensities. The Performing Arts Center would provide an amenity for downtown that would complement the increasing residential population and expansion of businesses. The proximate location to downtown is most appropriate for a cultural/arts facility. The modernization of the high school would secure the presence of the school at its existing location. The school campus serves as a buffer between the more intensive commercial and residential uses of downtown and the residential north Renton neighborhood. Another goal of the Downtown Element is to: Promote an improved downtown identity which is fostered through quality design of the streetscape, buildings and amenities. The architectural design of the Performing Arts Center is consistent with the character of the existing high school building. The building form, architectural details, and materials would improve the downtown identity. Hexreport.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department . ._liminary Report to the Hearing Examiner RENTON HIGH SCHOOL MODERNIZATION LUA-99-120, SA-H, V-H PUBLIC HEARING DATE: OCTOBER 26, 1999 Page 5 of 10 (2) CONFORMANCE WITH EXISTING LAND USE REGULATIONS The subject site is located in the Center Downtown zone. The major change to the existing building footprint would be the demolition of the east wing of Building 'A' for the construction of the Performing Arts Center. The following discussion provides an analysis of the proposal's compliance with the development standards of the CD zone: Lot Coverage - The lot coverage of buildings on the total site area would be 15.3% and the CD zone allows a maximum of 65%. Front Yard/Street Setback—The CD zone requires a minimum building setback of 15 feet and a maximum setback of 25 feet for buildings over 25 feet in height. The proposed Performing Arts Center would be setback approximately 82 feet from S. 2nd Street, thus exceeding the maximum setback. The proposed Performing Arts Center is designed to line up with the existing high school in terms of a street setback. The applicant is requesting approval of a variance from the maximum setback requirement. Side Yard Setback—None required. Rear Yard Setback—No rear yard setback is required except if a CD zoned lot is adjacent to a lot designated residential on the City Comprehensive Plan. In this case, a 15-foot wide landscape strip or a 5-foot wide sight-obscuring landscape strip with a solid 6-foot high barrier is required. There is residential property adjacent to the north of the subject site, across S. Tobin Street. The proposed school modernization and construction is focused on Building 'A' which fronts on S. 2nd Street. The overall school campus is over 25 acres in size and the proposal would not affect the north area of the site that is adjacent to the residential designation. Therefore, the Zoning Administrator has determined that the landscaped setback would not apply along the north property boundary of the subject site. Landscaping — The CD zone requires a 10-foot wide landscape strip along streets. This landscape strip is required on-site, exclusive of right-of-way improvements. The proposal maintains the existing landscape frontage along S. 2nd Street. This includes only a 5-foot width on the school property, and 5 feet on the adjacent street right-of-way. The applicant is requesting approval of a variance from the street landscaping requirement. The CD zone also requires a 15-foot landscaped visual barrier where a commercial lot is abutting property zoned residential. The subject site abuts residential property in the northwest corner with existing sports fields. The proposal would not alter the sports fields and the Zoning Administrator has determined that the zoning standard does not apply to that unaffected portion of the site. The parking code requires 5% interior parking lot landscaping. All the parking areas comply with this standard. Building Height—The maximum building height of the CD zone is 95 feet. Properties that have a"Public Suffix" (P)are permitted an additional 15 feet above the height permitted in the underlying zone, provided that pitched roofs are used. The proposed building height of the Performing Arts Center is 54 feet and the new penthouse would have a maximum building height of 56 feet. The proposed building heights comply with the height limit of the CD zone and the height provision of the 'P' suffix is not applicable. A building adjacent to a residential designated lot is allowed to exceed the height limit of the adjacent residential zone by 20 feet. The northern part of the school campus is adjacent to a residential zone, across S. Tobin Street. No new construction is proposed on this portion of the site. The new building construction is oriented toward S. 2"d Street. Therefore, the Zoning Administrator has determined that this height provision does not apply to renovation of'Building A' or to the construction of the Performing Arts Center. The proposed project would result in the demolition of the 48-foot high smokestack topped with a lightning rod. Presently these features are considered obstructions at the south end of the airport. The top of the smokestack is 134 feet above sea level, which is Hexreport.doc CO of Renton P/B/PW Department . ..;liminary Report to the Hearing Examiner RENTON HIGH SCHOOL MODERNIZATION LUA-99-120, SA-H, V-H PUBLIC HEARING DATE: OCTOBER 26, 1999 Page 6 of 10 105 feet above the airport elevation. The removal of the stack is considered beneficial to the safety of airport operations. Parking — Existing on-site parking is approximately 289 spaces. The proposal would add 167 parking spaces, principally in the east parking lot and along the road/parking corridor to the west of the building. There would be a total of 456 parking spaces with implementation of the proposal. Parking regulations require 1 space per employee plus 1 space per 10 students enrolled. In addition, if buses are kept at the school, 1 off-street parking space is required for each bus. Buses are not presently or planned to be kept at the high school. The environmental checklist prepared by the applicant estimates 90 to 100 staff work at the school site with approximately 1,000 full-time students. The maximum design capacity of the school would be for 1,400 students. This would require approximately 190 to 200 parking spaces for existing staff and student levels and 230 to 240 parking spaces for the design capacity. The proposed Performing Arts Center (PAC) would have 549 fixed seats. The parking regulations require 1 space per 4 fixed seats or 138 parking spaces. Public events in the PAC would occur during the evening and weekends and it is not anticipated to overlap with school parking needs. The applicant has requested a parking modification because the number of proposed spaces exceeds the required number of parking spaces. Parking modifications are a decision of the Administrator of Planning/Building/Public Works. (3) MITIGATION OF IMPACTS TO SURROUNDING PROPERTIES AND USES; The modernization/renovation of the school buildings and the construction of the Performing Arts Center is not expected to adversely impact surrounding properties or uses. The school buildings are situated on a 25-acre campus and the buildings proposed for major renovation are not immediately adjacent to surrounding uses. The only change in the existing footprint of the buildings would be the demolition of the east wing of Building 'A'for the construction of the Performing Arts Center. The proposal would change existing bus and vehicular circulation patterns on the site. Presently, school buses enter the site off S. 2nd Street and go through the site on the road/parking corridor to the west of the school buildings before exiting the site onto S. Tobin Street. A new bus access and related loading area would be constructed to the east of the school building and accessed off Logan Ave. S. The applicant estimates there are 24 total bus trips (12 buses in the morning and 12 in the afternoon) per day. The proposal would also expand a student and event parking lot on the east portion of the site. This parking area would be primarily accessed from S. 2nd Street, with another access from the Logan Ave. S. driveway. The environmental checklist prepared by the applicant states the existing school generates approximately 300 primary vehicle trips and 200 diverted link and by-pass trips per day. Single family residences abut the east property boundary of the subject site and would be impacted by the vehicular traffic and parking associated with the school. The landscape plan indicates a 10-foot wide landscape strip between the parking area and the back yards of the residences. The landscape strip is proposed to be planted with deciduous shade trees and shrubs. The applicant should revise the plantings to provide better visual screening of the parking area from the abutting residences. (4) MITIGATION OF IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN TO THE SITE; The proposed modernization/renovation of the Renton High School would not adversely impact the school campus site. The only change to the footprints of buildings would be the demolition of the east wing of Building 'A' for construction of the Performing Arts Center (PAC). The proposal would improve circulation on the site by eliminating the existing through road connecting S. 2nd and S. Tobin Streets, improving a bus drop-off area to the east of the buildings, and adding a south parking lot for visitor drop-off and parking. The proposal would add landscaping to the site and improve a student courtyard Hexreport.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department ,,,liminary Report to the Hearing Examiner RENTON HIGH SCHOOL MODERNIZATION LUA-99-120, SA-H, V-H PUBLIC HEARING DATE: OCTOBER 26, 1999 Page 7 of 10 between Buildings 'A' and 'B'. The applicant proposes removal of the existing, large redwood trees in front of the high school entry. Staff urges the school district to attempt to preserve these large specimen trees. (5) CONSERVATION OF AREA-WIDE PROPERTY VALUES; The proposed modernization/renovation of the high school would conserve or improve area-wide property values. (6) SAFETY AND EFFICIENCY OF VEHICLE AND PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION; As discussed previously, the proposal would change existing bus and vehicular circulation patterns on the site. Presently, school buses enter the site off S. 2nd Street and go through the site on the road/parking corridor to the west of the school buildings before exiting the site onto S. Tobin Street. A new bus access and related loading area would be constructed to the east of the school building and accessed off Logan Ave. S. The applicant estimates there are 12 total bus trips per day. The proposal would also expand a student and event parking lot on the east portion of the site. This parking area would be primarily accessed from S. 2nd Street, with another access from the Logan Ave. S. driveway. The proposal would also provide a south parking area for visitor drop-off and short-term parking. The site plan includes sidewalks for pedestrian circulation throughout the site. The proposed changes to circulation patterns and the configuration of parking on the site are improvements over the existing conditions on the site. (7) PROVISION OF ADEQUATE LIGHT AND AIR; There are adequate setbacks and distance between existing and proposed buildings to allow for adequate light and air to reach buildings. (8) MITIGATION OF NOISE, ODORS AND OTHER HARMFUL OR UNHEALTHY CONDITIONS*, The proposal would not result in noise, odors or other harmful or unhealthy conditions. Construction activities would generate noise. However, construction hours are limited by City Code and the construction activity would be temporal. (9) AVAILABILITY OF PUBLIC SERVICES AND FACILITIES TO ACCOMMODATE THE PROPOSED USE; AND Adequate public services and facilities are available to accommodate the proposed school modernization and Performing Arts Center. The applicant will be required to bring the buildings into compliance with present fire and building codes with the renovation of the buildings. (10) PREVENTION OF NEIGHBORHOOD DETERIORATION AND BLIGHT. The modernization of the high school would secure the presence of the school at its existing campus location. The school campus serves as a buffer between the more intensive commercial and residential uses of downtown and the residential north Renton neighborhood. The continued presence of the high school and the addition of the Performing Arts Center in the downtown area would serve to prevent neighborhood deterioration and blight. Hexreport.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department . ..,liminary Report to the Hearing Examiner RENTON HIGH SCHOOL MODERNIZATION LUA-99-120, SA-H, V-H PUBLIC HEARING DATE: OCTOBER 26, 1999 Page 8 of 10 G. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Renton High School Modernization Project File No. LUA-99-120, SA-H, V-H subject to the following conditions: (1) The applicant shall revise the landscape plantings along the east property boundary to provide better visual screening of the parking area from the abutting single family residences. The revised landscape plan shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division, prior to issuance of building permits. EXPIRATION PERIODS: Site Plan Approvals (SA): Two (2) years from the final approval (signature) date. 6. VARIANCE A. Proposal The applicant requests approval of two (2) variances from development standards of the Center Downtown (CD) zone. The first variance is to allow a front yard/street setback to exceed the maximum setback standard of 25 feet for buildings over 25 feet in height. The variance request pertains to the proposed Performing Arts Center (PAC), which would replace the existing east wing of Building 'A.' The PAC building would be setback 82 feet from the front property line, exceeding the maximum setback of 25 feet. The existing high school building is non-conforming to the code standard. The PAC building would be located closer to the front property line than the existing east wing of Building 'A', thus decreasing the level of non-conformity with the maximum setback standard. The applicant also requests a variance from requirements for a minimum 10-foot wide landscape strip along streets. There is presently a 10-foot wide landscape strip along the site frontage of S. 2nd Street, but 5 feet of the landscaping is located within the street right-of-way. An existing sidewalk is adjacent to the landscape strip. The landscape strip as required by code must be provided on-site. Therefore, the applicant is requesting a variance from the landscape standard. Approval of the variance would allow the existing landscape strip and sidewalk to remain. B. DECISION CRITERIA The Reviewing Official shall have authority to grant a variance upon making a determination in writing that the conditions specified below have been found to exist: 1. That the applicant suffers undue hardship and the variance is necessary because of special circumstances applicable to subject property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings of the subject property, and the strict application of the Zoning Code is found to deprive subject property owner of rights and privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity and under identical zone classification: Hexreport.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department . ._.iminary Report to the Hearing Examiner RENTON HIGH SCHOOL MODERNIZATION LUA-99-120, SA-H, V-H PUBLIC HEARING DATE: OCTOBER 26, 1999 Page 9 of 10 Front Yard/Street Setback Standard —The east wing of Building 'A' would be demolished for construction of a new Performing Arts Center (PAC). The new PAC would be inextricably linked to the existing high school building, both in terms of the programs and functions of the high school as well as the common facility and ancillary support systems. This necessitates locating the new building on a corridor axis connecting the two structures. The additional front yard setback is appropriate to maintain and enhance the campus setting of the school property. The intent of the maximum setback is to promote pedestrian access and to foster a central business district environment. The school property is located along S 2nd Street which is a wide boulevard and there are few other commercial businesses on the north side of the street. The maximum setback requirement is not appropriate to apply to the large scale of the school campus and the PAC building. The additional setback would allow landscaping in front of the buildings and would better showcase and honor one of the City's best historic buildings. The additional setback provides an opportunity to locate an off-street drop-off and short-term parking area, which is a great traffic safety improvement compared to the existing pull-over lane with space for 3-4 cars. Landscape Standard — The existing landscape strip meets the minimum width of the code standard, but 5 feet of the landscape strip is located in the street right-of-way. The applicant would have to tear out the existing sidewalk to install the additional landscape width. The only new work proposed in this area of the site is the addition of the drop-off lane/short term parking area. The existing conditions on the site present a special circumstance of the property and correcting the non-conforming condition would pose a hardship that is incommensurate with the project proposal. 2. That the granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which subject property is situated: Front Yard/Street Setback Standard — The granting of the variance would not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity. The approval of the variance would allow the new PAC structure to maintain a setback consistent with the existing 68-year old high school structure. The existing setback and building location are appropriate for the scale, proportion and architecture of the buildings. The proposed building (54-foot height) would be overpowering if located within the required setback distance. In order to meet the maximum building setback, the proposed drop-off, short-term parking area would need to be eliminated. This circulation feature is an improvement over existing conditions and its elimination would be detrimental to student and public use of the school and PAC facility. Landscape Standard — The granting of the variance would allow for retaining the existing sidewalk and landscape configuration. If the landscape were expanded to comply with the code standard, the sidewalk would be offset from its existing alignment, only along the school property. This could pose a hazard or inconvenience to pedestrian and vehicular safety. Approval of the variance would not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That approval shall not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is situated: Front Yard/Street Setback Standard - The school campus is a setting unlike any neighboring property. The historic nature of the school buildings, and the building scale in proportion to the size of the site merits special consideration. Therefore, the approval of a variance would not constitute a grant of special privilege. Hexreport.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department liminary Report to the Hearing Examiner • RENTON HIGH SCHOOL MODERNIZATION LUA-99-120, SA-H, V-H PUBLIC HEARING DATE: OCTOBER 26, 1999 Page 10 of 10 Landscape Standard — The applicant is requesting a variance to retain the existing non- conforming condition of the landscape strip. The proposal does not require street right-of-way improvements and does not modify this area of the site. The code does not include any specific threshold for when a site development or modification to an existing building/site is required to bring a nonconforming landscape up to compliance with the code standard. 4. That the approval is a minimum variance that will accomplish the desired purpose: Front Yard/Street Setback Standard — The new Performing Arts Center is proposed in alignment with the existing (and nonconforming) 1931 high school structure. This alignment is necessary for the connection of facility systems between the buildings and to connect functions of the high school and PAC. Therefore, the requested front yard setback variance is the minimum approval necessary to accomplish the desired purpose of the school district. Landscape Standard — The variance request would allow for continuation of an existing nonconforming condition. The City Code does not have a threshold for when an expansion or renovation requires correcting of nonconforming conditions. The applicant is not requesting a lessor standard for new construction. The configuration of the existing landscape strip and sidewalk are consistent along the entire block. Therefore, the proposal is a minimum variance from the landscape standard. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the two (2) variance requests for the Renton High School Modernization Project File No. LUA-99-120, SA-H,V-H. Hexreport.doc City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: djele-S COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 16, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-120,CU-H DATE CIRCULATED: SEPTEMBER 2, 1999 APPLICANT: Renton School District PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen PROJECT TITLE: Renton High School Modernization WORK ORDER NO: 78573 LOCATION: 400 South Second Street SITE AREA: 25.84 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for modernization of the existing Renton High School. The east wing would be removed for construction of a new 16,500 square foot Auditorium/Performing Arts Center. There would be extensive interior modernization of the principal school building, Building "A". The project would include systems upgrades and minor alterations to the Gymnasium/Food Service Commons building, Building "B". The existing Vocational building at the north end of the site may be used for interim classrooms during construction, but would be utilized for central warehouse/food storage after completion of the project. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics _ Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet Lji/leAk_ B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS In ( k • 67,4 , (. 0/2'1", 166 C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS ate, 7/j-Le/7/ riMe / We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertis and have identified areas of probable impact or areas wheriadditional information is n9Jded to properly as ess this proposal. • ,t 4-v ri/r Signature of Director o-r Authori ed Representative Dat Rev.10/93 roulingform PROJECT LUA-99-120, CU,H Renton High School Modernization City of Renton Department of Planning/ Building / Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET (Continuation) POLICE RELATED COMMENTS No New Construction = No Additional Calls for Service CONSTRUCTION PHASE Theft from construction sites is one of the most common reported crimes in the city. To protect materials and equipment it is recommended that all materials and tools be locked up when not in use. The site will need security lighting and any construction trailer should be completely fenced in with portable chain-link fencing. The fence will provide both a physical and psychological barrier to any prospective thief and will demonstrate that this area is private property. Construction trailers should be kept locked when not in use, and should also have a heavy-duty deadbolt installed with no less then a 1-1/2" throw when bolted. Glass windows in the trailer should be shatter-resistant. I also recommend the business post the appropriate "No Trespassing" signs on the property while it's under construction (flier attached). This will aid police in making arrests on the property after hours if suspects are observed vandalizing or stealing building materials. Page 1of1 ' .�� Trespass it USINES Enforcement WATCH • Quite often, business owners and managers are faced with crimes that occur on the property after the businesses are closed and the employees have gone home. Some of the crimes that occur are burglary, vandalism, graffiti, trespassing, drug dealing and robbery in the parking lots. There is a way for police and business owners to discourage these types of crimes from taking place on private property, and that is by enforcing the City of Renton's Municipal Trespass Code 6-18-10. In order for police to be able to make an arrest for Trespass, business owners or managers need to purchase signs and display them in conspicuous areas on the property. These signs need to include the following language: 1. Indicate that the subject property is privately owned and; 2. Uninvited presence on the specified property is not permitted during the hours the business is closed, and; 3. Violators will be subject to criminal sanctions pursuant to Renton City Code 6-18-10. MOST IMPORTANTLY-THE SIGNS SHOULD BE CONSPICUOUS FROM ALL POSSIBLE POINTS OF ENTRY TO THE PROPERTY, AND ALSO BE PLACED ON THE EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDINGS. This way when a suspect is arrested, he/she will not be able to claim as a defense that he/she did not know he or she was trespassing. EXAMPLES FOR TRESPASS SIGNS: NO TRESPASSLNG NO TRESPASSENG This is private property. Persons without specific No Trespassing after business hours business are not authorized to be on the premises between (insert specific times). Anyone on the the hours of(insert the hours your business is closed). premises after business hours is subject to Violators are subject to arrest and/or citation for criminal arrest and/or citation for Criminal Trespass pursuant to Renton City Code #6-18-10.. Trespass and/or impoundment of vehicle. Per Renton City Code #6-18-10. By enforcing the Trespass Ordinance, business owners and police will be sending a message to criminals that they are not allowed to conduct criminal activity on the property. In making arrests for Trespass, police may be preventing the more serious crimes from taking place. ^Y r COURTESY OF RENTON POLICE DEPARTMENT CRIME PREVENTION UNIT 14"-'i� 235 - 2571 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: I— ..W1t\oWtiC, DU&&t ,IOMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 16, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-120,CU-H DATE CIRCULATED: SEPTEMBER 2, 1999 APPLICANT: Renton School District PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen PROJECT TITLE: Renton High School Modernization WORK ORDER NO: 78573 LOCATION: 400 South Second Street SITE AREA: 25.84 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for modernization of the existing Renton High School. The east wing would be removed for construction of a new 16,500 square foot Auditorium/Performing Arts Center. There would be extensive interior modernization of the principal school building, Building"A". The project would include systems upgrades and minor alterations to the Gymnasium/Food Service Commons building, Building"B". The existing Vocational building at the north end of the site may be used for interim classrooms during construction, but would be utilized for central warehouse/food storage after completion of the project. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics _ Water Light/Glare _ Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet i _14,000 Feet _ __ B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS N c..) eUL.I L` I SSL • C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS C► ct: NLC1 r1(zi1/tNLcr\2 PL rl10usc HEic.tl"T r/U5r teeUtr I}0}ci-/7 (raC We have reviewe this ao ication with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas wher- additional inf ion r ed to properly assess this proposal. rn Signature ire orAuthoriz eprl5sentative Date / routingform Rev.10/93 CITY OF RENTON PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: September 6, 1999 TO: Jennifer Toth Henning FROM: Gail Reed, Airport Manager SUBJECT: Renton High School Performing Arts Center The Environment Checklist, submitted by the Renton School District for the Renton High School performing arts center, indicates that two structures will be demolished,the two story Junior High building and the 48 foot tall smoke stack. The smoke stack and the lightning rod atop the stack is presently listed as an obstruction at the south end of the airport. The height to the top of the stack and lightning rod is 134 feet above sea level,which is 105 feet above the airport elevation. The removal of this smoke stack is desired as it will increase safety for aircraft arriving to or departing from the airport. A departure runway safety area extends southward 1,000 feet from the south end of the runway. This safety area extends southward and upward from the runway end at a slope of 20:1. Care should be taken to insure that new construction does not extend above the slope of the safety area. cc: \\TS SERVER\SYS2\COMMON\C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\RHSPERFI.DOC City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: PiWpov COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 16, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-120,CU-H DATE CIRCULATED: SEPTEMBER 2, 1999 APPLICANT: Renton School District PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen PROJECT TITLE: Renton High School Modernization WORK ORDER NO: 78573 LOCATION: 400 South Second Street SITE AREA: 25.84 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for modernization of the existing Renton High School. The east wing would be removed for construction of a new 16,500 square foot Auditorium/Performing Arts Center. There would be extensive interior modernization of the principal school building, Building"A". The project would include systems upgrades and minor alterations to the Gymnasium/Food Service Commons building, Building "B". The existing Vocational building at the north end of the site may be used for interim classrooms during construction, but would be utilized for central warehouse/food storage after completion of the project. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation XX Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet yes 14,000 Feet yes A Notice of Proposed Construction, FAA Form 7460-1, must be submitted. B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS The smoke stack on the High School property is listed as an obstruction by the FAA. The removal of the stack during the proposed project is welcomed by the Airport. There is not one-height limit, as mentioned in the application as being 90 feet. The height limit is lowest at the north end of the property and highest at the south end, on a 20: 1 slope. The Airport Runway Protection Zone extends south of the airport from the departure runway end a distance of 1,000 feet, as shown on the attached RPZ page. C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have v ed this ... ation with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas wh r a ditiong_I in . ati.di needed to properly assess this proposal. f�/l 0 •47 it O. Reed, Airport Manager Se 2, 1g99 Signature 'ector or Authorized Representative Date rouUngform Rev.10/93 ��Y o CITY OF RENTON FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU MEMORANDUM DATE: September 3, 1999 TO: Peter Rosen, Senior Planner FROM: Corey Thomas, Plans Review Inspector SUBJECT: Code-related comments for Renton High School 1 . The preliminary fire flow required is 4,000 gpm with one fire hydrant within 150- feet of the structure and three hydrants within 300-feet of the structure. A looped fire main is required to be installed around the building. Existing fire hydrants can be used if they are up to current standards or can be brought up to city standards by adding 5-inch storz fittings. 2. The fire mitigation fees are applicable at the rate of $0.52 per square foot of increased building area only, if any. 3. An approved fire sprinkler system is required to be installed throughout the building. An approved standpipe system is required in the building. 4. An approved fire alarm system is required to be installed throughout the building. 5. Fire access is required on the north side of the building in order to meet section 902.2.1 which requires access to within 150-feet of all points of the building. Roadways are required to be a minimum 20-feet wide with turning radius of 25-feet inside and 45-feet outside. CT:ct rhs CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: September 7, 1999 TO: Peter Rosen FROM: Arneta Henninger X7298 kk SUBJECT: RENTON HIGH SCHOOL 400 S 2ND ST APPLICATION I have reviewed the application for this proposed buildings generally located in Section 18- 23N-5E and have the following comments: SANITARY SEWER: • This project is not located in the Aquifer Protection Zone. • There is an 8" sanitary sewer main in S 2nd St. • There is a 12" and a 15" sanitary sewer main in S Tobin St. • There is a 8" sanitary sewer main in Logan Av S. • There is a 15" sanitary sewer main through the middle of the site. • The conceptual utility plan appears to be in order. • Any use in the building(s) subject to oils or grease shall require the installation of a grease interceptor or oil/water separator as determined at the time of plan review. • System Development Charges (SDC) are $0.078 per square foot. These fees are collected at the time a construction permit is issued. Please note that any parcel that currently has water and or sewer service is eligible for a prorated system development charge. Your project will be reviewed to determine how much redevelopment credit applies. WATER: • The site is not located in the Aquifer Protection Zone. • The project site is located in the 196 Pressure Zone. RENTON HIGH SCHOOL APPLICATION September 9, 1999 Page 2 of 3 • There is an existing 8" watermain in S 2nd St from Lake Av S to Whitworth Av S. • There is an existing 12" watermain in S 2nd St from Whitworth Av S to Burnett Av S. • There is an existing 8" watermain in Lake Av S. • There is an existing 12" watermain in S Tobin St. • There is an existing 10" watermain in Logan Av S. • There is an existing watermain through the middle of the site. The City does not have any records on this watermain. The applicant will need to verify the material and exact location of this watermain. This is important since one of the buildings will be required to tap into this main for the new sprinkler system. If the main is not in good condition and if it is smaller than an 8" it will need to be replaced by the applicant in order to utilize it for any additional water usage. • The watermain that is located on the easterly side of the site currently ends in a fire hydrant. This lead to the fire hydrant is 6" in diameter. If this fire hydrant is needed to meet the project site's fireflow requirements then this pipe will need to be replaced by the applicant and upsized to a minimum 8" in diameter. • Per the City of Renton Fire Marshall, the preliminary fire flow for this project is 4,000 GPM. (This includes credit given for a sprinkler system.) Any new construction must have one fire hydrant capable of delivering a minimum of 1,000 GPM and shall be located within 150 feet of the structure and two additional hydrants (also capable of delivering a minimum of 1,000 GPM) within 300 feet of the structure. This distance is measured along the travel route. • The water conceptual utility plan is not approved. The conceptual water utility plan does not take into account the above three notes. A new watermain extension may be required for this project. • The existing water service lines and/or meters may need to be relocated and/or upsized to comply with current City of Renton code. • Water System Development Charges of $0.113 per square foot gross area may be required if not previously paid. The Development Charges are collected as part of the construction permit. Please note that any parcel that currently has water and or sewer service is eligible for a prorated system development charge. Your project will be reviewed to determine how much redevelopment credit applies. STREET IMPROVEMENTS: • This project will not be required to do any street improvements for this site. • This project will not be required to do any additional street lights for this site. , RENTON HIGH SCHOOL APPLICATION September 9, 1999 Page 3 of 3 DRAINAGE: • A conceptual drainage plan was submitted with the formal application for the project. It generally appears to be in order. A Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan shall be submitted for review and approval prior to any permits being issued for demolition or construction. • There are storm drainage facilities in S 2nd St. • There are storm drainage facilities in Lake Av S. • There are storm drainage facilities in S Tobin St. • There are storm drainage facilities in Logan Av S. • The Surface Water SDC fees of $0.129 (but not less than $385) per square foot of new impervious area may be required if not previously paid. GENERAL: • All required utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed Civil Engineer. • Permit application must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. The fee for review and inspection of these improvements is 5% of the first $100,000 of the estimated construction costs; 4% of anything over $100,000 but less than $200,000, and 3% of anything over $200,000. Half of the fee must be paid upon application for building and construction permits, and the remainder when the permits are issued. There may be additional fees for water service related expenses. See Drafting Standards. RENHSGF City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:Cohsl-yuChcm Sev�tLt� COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 16, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-120,CU-H DATE CIRCULATED: SEPTEMBER 2, 1999 APPLICANT: Renton School District PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF-RENTON PROJECT TITLE: Renton High School Modernization WORK ORDER NO: 78573 LOCATION: 400 South Second Street SEP 0 3 1999 SITE AREA: 25.84 acres BUILDING AREA(gross): RECEIVED SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for modernization of the existing Renton High School. The east wing would be removed for construction of a new 16,500 square foot Auditorium/Performing Arts Center. There would be extensive interior modernization of the principal school building, Building "A". The pro ect would include systems upgrades and minor alterations to the Gymnasium/Food Service Commons building, Building "B". The existing Vocational building at the north end of the site may be used for interim classrooms during construction, but would be utilized for central warehouse/food storage after completion of the project. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS C We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to property assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date rou6ngform Rev.1 Ci53 SECTION*TWP 23 N,RCE 5 E,WM ...au Call 6 before you i ill 1-800-424-5555 -............ - SCALE T-40' rzwzr.r ;4,N out ROL ,Oa.1.RA .03 1.-1.MO.MRS ,11100.oxfui inn VISO..10.4 WNW ems NM KT UP 0 Irma am I ''..-1.-• Elsi zzu.r.==.:=1 ........ NM...mit ',WM.,•a ,OM mut R. • • q NM Pa MN VOA Mo. 1 1 1 ...... 1 I II i . • ---- -7.1".. ____ -. I as. ______-__ 1,. .,___, , . .1 , 1 . .. - I' •• , -,;.,,,ii ---7"--: -- - i . l' I I, 1.1111: 141 i'''•,ir ',.. I, , I: 1•1, '.; ' 44*, 0 0 Ka...0 Nu 11.0. ......". I I. ....... ammo sr r fa ma .1 RAMO* - ' 1 .... i . I ••••••^1N i Z .... ^ .,..." ... ".... ;.. Ce / ,E ..0111 ,' .-* '.•• imrs • - . .-'"ln I:j--- ".' rAiligroi . irim---- -1 a. • I—I i i! i ,-, ,..- '--- '--•/"—`---7-___ ___ ._:,____-, ......, . - • —— • listR.iii 71- . . ,, ,' ,,., ,,' ..-i. •.• < T ": .—.- LEBO •WM ReS IA C um_ Awl 84840 waa. . 10 0••••••V 1,ItIO 1 O. ; „j•/ 2, _ _____ /./ ereii*N'y 0001 ra. 7.. • .. /y_ '', ..... i V...` ,..t;•::„.'OP...... L I ,....J' ....,•,... ./......... CAW 0.1Av ._.., MLI . . Y/ .....-44... • ..A• . t'.-t'., ,'-'r 'a'" 0,... I • • . If- _._ ft.L. • . I .0 likk SIM Mimi um _ _ . =LT Oa r LON WM . 1 " \..... --.— , 10.0010. IMIUM OWN P.•••• '1, 1 ...4...,.., .1111.•15. [ -..--",'-- / N.. '.1..i....t..,.1,,..,,;,,, c... • :'.7.±:.. A Irk .' .: ..,. . ' s/ ., ;-.......0 -I T, OAK ems .. 1;........I, WO, go.c.,. :: •• 2 t'" yin.5f.10., • • \ 4. .. ., _+-r S .. - 0 E .ottf•REA In• ) <0,,,-,•-•C x a , .. '. ,'. ' •-1 -Lk 1 '..i 0-. —0 .3.•0.0.• ® __ :-..E, f i 0 6 El"--, 3'2,:f)1 i- v ,..?...r, , .2 0 2 4 .. ..... . — ' : .--- ...., /....4 ,,•,',%: \c • I-.0 q ; I.- r': _..------' <, • . / / ..•'. _ - , ;z,i 6 -,----€;) , i .....li... '.I t'r[°-: 0110••WOVE .0.''* . . 71 so nm : •6: •...• X ,..C.31.• "i • •tt-- -4-- ' 1 7 ... . .. . . E q 9 1 -- 7 771:4 T r .4-- ;",-,,,1,'414, 4.' •!g 1 c- WNW 01006 g59 ./ r' '•-. ' :14:Iiirti FIT°., .iliiiirAll ,Eail !.. fa as••••0 .4 t Itl. 1 ..... . I r IN Ilea , . 40*. OIM.. Mr ' 11 .1.-i1.1•TA.:: It . . . • ii,‘ : I • .' • ' / • 1 - BA .00 Po 0.1.001 - 116. .' . . • ...1.:14..4 i' 'r,..,'I'.°;1.''..-..t..4.:.' , . . . 'lg. 11' .:;t::1 ' /111E.. ...illt%kt. .9 44. ' A.•• “re• i 44.0.ir • Jillil. 1. ! rirl.11.._ ••••••,-...........mih„ D.rt I-01-94 i - •.- . .. _ -- ''.-- ——.1.-i— rt; 1--7— ---.° ... % ' ..sailf .---• A 1..-- • * CO. 1 1 .., ...*, al.- LS' - • .0. I . V -7 '). it, 7d` ---1 - •:( :,-•• -1)- —.___,--- i • • IC ill: . ...-.............. )• __FIE V1151.111: -�'- — Sr T-T -- --I - —om i _ ■ 1 �- I I I • �. Ili' V IE I I I I°' ? T J `ti I I II i r �, //,{?) I I I mP P /) ICI • I I I IMP ' M I I f I ,• I 1 1 I I • I I I I- I W -1- -I--1-J—_L__1 1 maaae 9� _ I _ -J IW,.., ;': I- . I- .:t.... I cc • I c III i y . �1 ' • • I 1 < I !. 5 , , ,, ,....___ JJ ,i, 1g7 r>11_, .....„�-rPARII G,LOT COVERAGE,LANDSCAPING ANALYSIS: (.)w.nwE 1 1 1 ! / ��—- • +1 TOT...ARE FOOTAGE OF r.■IE1F'a1s..s.a L .. • 1 • L / % 1I r W E)roT.•UWIE ROOTAGE or WNW.A�aLva■■f•ACE ALEA Aw.EE.t ��� F / 1)TOTAL SO ARE FOOTAGE OF FWOW).NTURAUUWIEVEOFEG AMA ILA ___ ,• / .)MI EFOOTAGE■,'FLOOR NO OVERALL TOTAN OF EACH EEEVITANL T , E.anw •OWLL.WSam•WWI al_WI r.ar LL.Fwe••.,1J1E.1. I� - NRDI107 / TOT.■EGEO'A':Eni.t I i ____ /% or a� - P ■■GOT.Is Om•KM LL.WI bs-MAID al. // I 1-I,� I �1 TOT E■GE01I:WW1•1 L _ /, %I ————-I roT.E■GNGC VAN.. / { 1 TOT WIARE FOOTAGE R TE FOOTPRINTS OF ALL■GM.two/LL / / .� •_ 1-r . L.)FFRCHRWE OF LOT COVERED R M1M0E d STRUCTURE.1.ER ,q., / 7)TOT.MNE.ENT*WARE FOOTAGE EOM EMTEO FAVBBR TO FEWR •ii i••'•♦ I w HEw FAVBE,R FI.DFG®TOW EeTAR�aFt.a I ;*:. . �* Wf• - / / - I i LI BODAFIEAG[CF WY UI■1F PEnAEIt wA -• ———— 1 -,, TOTAL MOWER OF WAIL RaaEG:WWr II •.�✓✓ • .::!.•✓.•.:•:❖i•��� - �� / • �- I LR Ii•F... •ars-tat ll.r.ww r,fs.wN T/11 p. ••. • •�, / / - •I I t � TOT.NEWER OF VALLS FnonDeEo WWr - I '••. •' ^ •r••:✓••J •:•:�•�� d I ct • I .IGNECAPPEO WAua rFa 1 NW ER ••• I : (•40 E /4 O: "° -� r /•. �I 1 J■, rout caws WALLA FRuoEE¢E WY W&rw MIN • IIi �e• ,f rat/ �•+�.Fr'-•'•Y'J�i`� __ _-_ /, I1. I TOT.u n.11 FRaro�n+r = IN ::::::: r! /.r r t-A:►V••f IP RNOROMy V.I.LWSWOE:I.V II •,, ••�__ .l:l�.::.:.::•' •_—___� L 1 ��� DUfALT■.q RWALL ALL OEB■01E�•IR.,f II' •• • ••�•��i•i:%• ••'••••�•i'i i� w1 ROWE FOOTAGE OF WOOER FA■■O LOT LAIWCROWL I :4::✓ • •.•••..•_ - - r--- • T t RORINE■aT LOW WW1 LL FoRs,W.1 Landem IEy _.. ASS EEtTRAFl0T:,41ELLFr•1AV J.LoiY.r■y A/ ,411::rd L 1 ♦ L-�� • WAN STAR ROT:Weal WAG A T1E..ROW..OW) �/, •O•.ry •• ■ WET RELIC LOT:MOO LL Fr•1EV al Lon...ME a �f'ii✓...- , ��•••. ! - • . I�. ��——___ _ i ~din,WELL Fr.Ak LL wrap.D"' I ..� U tt f 4. V.✓✓✓i I�•i LW ERROR LOT.RAP al M1..',.,TALL La.a•w1111y .I. �, • - 1' / TCR.POgCLOFPAVEOEEWLL o f ••.i• •� " '_'.moo l • f,■'�--�of� FN: ! 91 l01nE0 LOTt.dCXE@ilM 4IE �••�/ '.- ••y1 �•, / , I I • I ———— h EdRO LOT LAFOfCAFEWIL Am a/ EGRwWDTAGEv1A.GrvE Ell w.tw•1FsWW4 ■� �7 t. L +• AMLEW NEWT:ES IL RROWRO GWR.1i'NE' ^ FNEEpO lTE•bRI N" TtI . b OWV.os LL L RW1 RF !E.lr...H D.....i Ow ,' ii �(.W.moFlww wW:.or....Pgs•• F►FI• VKV� , _ =., —'1 !J•eol.1 ,`� ` F:wvw.AFs.AF.sV L - '1�� , ,. :_J 9 �-�r-- C • , �' ''C7 O . RWvw•15 A Mode.1•Yr.1.s•War•le RSMFr A,W P! ■ ., —.y,> , ■ ' ' p •,.> • .`v-z �/ l Sx S PULSING W - - • -- •Ls~ g,g—, .i F 'fit... , ¢a 1. A -).`,_�r�F• _ r r, T! I /• ' SST �! �. L ,.. '.�"L�T�.. •'I f 1 • 77 121 liV _- N — - l y- C: DC� o�c:ri74s Y ✓ �5��.+___.. "=f_ r ••I J S. 2N D ST-rr: — - _ >o JiJ c , E` , E., L..,,A ly it E-.. t-.. t:'+ 1.�. E.i Iwi E� �.,• 1•..i. Up OM MM. o " A. 1-AWI SCALE Y•40' NORTH _ aa,o Dan N1 M• 10 ea A SITE PLAN 1.0 M I -�i I J-- I 1 , J 1--, r- , I�1 L i r I &' 404 2 it II 7 1 I `ui1j fl. ��#r(i! p-,,,,-1a` - I { - ' I I - RI II rmia,„, , Be isTO it iI / , - ii - ----- t - -- J f IP L�'� IiI � �f �� a ; ' lal,( It I t ICI ;! ! ( I. _� 'INN. D D. " 1 , t it 1 1-9- .zjn a^dr i�E --ii g�4 .3:..II. Nx., f " yf_,t • _1 EEi — ( ,I ii , . _�. --Isms ' P c ' ? r I -Pi' 1 1:d //l � m��ii � '«�� -`:O9p re / i� wwF�T— � �s — �,; •, lt idY a lt. ,i $204�8^.:Y�3R�4_�:' � I J _1 irei 0 ''"Irnrall" 2 lilit4 larEr:2 I. '-'0 i1 i !� - ( ► 1 !II11I'jj cif �� � i i ' I. _' D c'"0 I,I� 110 P I Cla; 11t ,1 ' .:4 p , ...:....:. ...: ;1� •..... -rya i 1.�a;/..,1 _ II . , ,; i , errM1'1 .� I[ ,. 1 ,i1.. Y r i '`sa ?-s . I. ih F IFS1 �' 1 /,I� ' 1c ork';�• � , i Y / N/ ' I 1 � 1 Cr. �1 I \ '/ 1 1 :t ,.*n..o' L.....;•:::::-:.kiie I ii::i i:!;;..i: ., ill I.. I ' 1�� CI . r -n :S::'It i, 170 i• �'.:7; ``•i�d� f+ a 7 l•' ..��` t � is 1� � f� �4T�� �1 •� ! `' �S'yiS 1, N �` - `I . �1 I i 1' 10 hI; I. ` ,,,. ,' I -, I mo` '- �. Ike i ; N ' - 0 1 Hil Tr— �� • LJ,i,, ---- .,.. ... 1 : 11 ..t; 1 , `Nll�i1ill,. a Z � I• \ '. \ J eido r' 6 )f\ �4 — Ye . - I I I I I I I I I 1 I I :s+ "7; -0 8 f1 I 1 lI Ill I 1 I I I I I I tR r 1 1 I I 1 I 1 I f i 1 1 1 1 --1 1 1 1 I 1 1 frt.. s$. 1i: 0 § Li L--I-LOGAN-AVE---1-Si---j-----L---- ----- i_ 1 1 ',.;2 G-a I , ..SCHOOL u00M1,2.TOa `-, I • r ° azs 1`LAI RENTON HIGH SCHOOL We �.. SITE PLAN APPROVAL SET , r` O i i.!6 �� REHTON SCHOOL DISTRICT >r103 REVISIONS LiVn u: III dill II III II 11� Iglu Is ::: E7.7,11 ,1 1 I© ___ _, _ ® ® ® _ [1 RE NTON NI6X SCHOOL 1 �s F ' ! III MII II It 111 11 UII 8 u 4 IT • M I M i •�°� o- : II II — 00 00 00 00 — - 00 0. ao 00 • _ �..� • i i .m m o0 00. 1 I I 1 n 77 61d1d1� ��. t.— 4: , i • •"-5"i „ OSOUTH ELEVATION • IIII IIIIIIIIIIIII ' I1 IIIIIIVIIIIIVI i' IIIIII IN fir+f r h-:,;:,,7 " ;r ,N, ° ' • :urag?,3xr k' rT rf++� o o • .r rr, 7tr}rrr"N rf fi l +- PJ r� r rfr r3 rie4rrllJrFlr rrj!¢rr r rrrj rrGr�.,p O t r r f� rr rr . rJ .,r r, r t r f Irrr r r r r rr.0 { f.tf1 trr rr,,.. o r r"rt r, 1r err.•. «r ,: N ���. rhl4I i__® �� r- x+r�5�r.:r"r r.� r r r , �� 2 r -..,"r "rr'r rr7r-r'-{r7~,. ..sx tafii+a rx s l ,._ U co 0 El !i! fFk " 1 `.rrt}�.rr7ar4°r 1W. % — _ 1i!! g� ii,%..tl.;1.Y� ,i _ ZO.lPrrrl,1rrrrrrr r ,/ _ ®® !f 7f rrr7'+rrrr r r rr17i-Pri•FRk-T;i7Allak r J � _ 11 i1�1 ref I{g}��x I §O :r // A 111, , ,,. __,._ , , I. A,1.-i.:., ____721pm. ....... e t__ _ 11 tt _.1. DO MI 311 �. mR. W..No.WIN Mak .N.A®TO m.. . I ...... , m: , SOUTH ELEVATIONMg xd.: t/N'-to' MATERIALS LEGEND u� O " ,i n"oNe I""resN ▪.0 2-9SOi= • t]EV-t IIIIVIIIIIIIIVII �rE°0'LL� ` C motto GJO S-t6-99 rrjrit » ....O..O.+.�,N .... ap H. A s••^a+ e..,.,. ELEVATIONS 1 SCALE:NE-1'-O' ' REVISIONS ` 01 .rs` 1 , irrfaimirl hill l i �7® - ._�—� YI _ it �711 IL ■ '. 4. n� . OSOUTHEAST P.A.C. ELEVATION rBtl!'fFt!,?74 ,.?lrrkr�ft5r?4i,A,' .''_:: '6r'rip ip? �"FitiT>'tr4:. : •~'�cr{',,F 44:, .- , IMI n _ h 0 1- �'^�''�`7 •i mow... "-' Ili EAST P.A.C. ELEVATION =U U +`.. O So lAr-I-O' ,.,.. Z h Ho -Z Z I CL¢ . 3 a ontri- a =E'.� I. j [ MATERIALS LEGEND r/�/; - SUM 1405 MOT...96121 z-,eo.z V_z I num Ng ONORTHWEST P.A.C. ELEVATION "°'"° °" °° A Sods: 1/e'-I'-0' .�.-w-...,.. ELEVATIONS 2 • SCALE:I/S'-T-0' IIeVwaM8 • 1e ,r-ri rtr glig'j r''+rr'l.^?.;,fir:f... ��a��� II1I,i .T►f'r^:j•rf:rf:r....J}y.�,:.rF,l:,.F'.��„,':,r� ',.,.,...,..,.._....,..,..... - :r, 'rr.T lTf »+,.:.... ,i'l'TT„rrJj.irrr.,Jl7rrifr'?ii'rr,:r';r.i,r!r't!tf?ii�1r�?r iir?{ .;'r.ct L ..,. P.1:..._..__...._.. — :..... • ._ s: r...,.r.,...r.,r r.,;r:r:...... -.imfr�,`�:,7.Tr 1;r�r h'rf „1,.;r.L r+Jr�`.t-r:r r .r si 1rr.r:;.rr:......rx:rJa .ar:,._.. �• t r. hvr -- -;rn avt a � :h .eO — - r.4.. lTrrf r o EN ®i10i I® i® T 04't1 .t7 J _ 7 1 Tf�Y� _T�. a 17P 4. ilI!' flTfl ......� 1...�. !I j �-=� �-=� '_ 'ryl s... h1l ® €ei ■MIIrs ill ■Il1Mll oel�sI 1ls� lA1111i ONORTH ELEVATION - sca.: ,/e•-r-o' • !Ili0} h i I' =o - __ . 01- ' co_h _ O Wff ''—' I Imo_ 1 =J Lam. ) - — < __ 8 Iol 1' I®I _W X .r t;ir;r?7�jlr,"r?i?r.T4i r =lT�rt"..13.?WiNifYrHi�Inn,F�r'f P.4F irif i / a ; •, itf}f10,00.r rif'l ithi li fiijti� r{. {�},fryli�f?lflr ff:r i.,0l'fii /, Iff — W W �Il�� �_.._ 00 Up I [I B - 11 11 -1T=-. ONORTH ELEVATION MATERIALS LEGEND :2'4'A: .......o- ...gym cva.. ..2-9e092 nt ¢cv-3 • .1 e � m..,�.,m.... o.R 8-1e-99 I ...... �. ..�.. .. �b A ELEVATION. 3 ....�........ .CALL ME-T.O. AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Charlotte Ann Kassens first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of the SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL -- 600 S. Washington Avenue, Kent, Washington 98032 Legals HEARING a dailynewspaper seven (7)times a week. Said newspaper is a le al NOTICE OF PUBLICNGEXAMINER published9 RENTON HEARING EXAMINER newspaper of general publication and is now and has been for more than six months RENTON,WASHINGTON 99 prior to the date of publication, referred to, printed and published in the English language A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular continually as a daily newspaper in Kent, King County, Washington. The South County meeting in the Council Chambers on the Journal has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the seventh floor of City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way. Renton, Washington, on State of Washington for King County. October 19, 1999 at 9:00 AM to consider The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the South County the following petition: Journal (and not in supplemental form)which was regularly distributed to the subscribers RENTON HIGH SCHOOL MODERNI- ZATION during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a LUA-99-120,SA-H Proposal for modernization of the existing Renton High School. Location:400 South Renton High School Modernization Second Street. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Development as published on: 10/8/99 Services Division, Sixth Floor, City Hall, Renton. All interested persons are invited The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $34.50, to be present at the Public Hearing to express their opinions. The project charged to Acct. No. 805106 : manager is Peter Rosen.(425)430-7219. Publication Date:October 8,1999 Legal Number 6671 Published in the South County Journal October 8, 1999.6671 Legal e , ou County J mal G Subscribed and sworn before me his ! day of—��,L._—, 19 / / otilttttN 0 _ �.-*,*+ ONF 4;•••0�S Notary Pu is of the State of ashington NOTARY `� s_ residing in Renton -•- • = King County, Washington N 1' 'BUD L1C O ��O�IVJA S N``��\\ 1111111 E F REVISED PUBLIC AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION NOTIO HEAR IN EXAM N RRING RENTON RENTON,WASHINGTON Charlotte Ann Kassens first dulysworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of theA RentonPu Hearinge Hearing willExaminerb held ab the at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the of Cit , 1055 South SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL GradyhWay,r Re ntony,Hall Washington, on October 26, 1999 at 9:00 AM to consider 600 S. Washington Avenue, Kent, Washington 98032 the following petitions: RENTON HIGH SCHOOL MODERNIZATION a daily newspaper published seven (7)times a week. Said newspaper is a legal LUA-99=120,SA-H,V-H newspaper of general publication and is now and has been for more than six months Proposal for modernization of the existing prior to the date of publication, referred to, printed and published in the English language Se Stgh School. Location: 400 South Seccoonndd Street. continually as a daily newspaper in Kent, King County, Washington. The South County Legal descriptions of the files noted Journal has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the above are on file in the Development State of Washington for KingCounty. Services Division, Sixth Floor, City Hall, g y Renton. All interested persons are invited The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the South County to be present at the Public Hearing to Journal (and not in supplemental form)which was regularly distributed to the subscribers express their opinions. Publication Date: October 12,1999 during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a Published in the South County Journal October 12.1999.6708 Renton High School Modernization as published on: 10/12/99 The full amount of the fee char for said foregoing publication is the sum of$40.20, charged to Acct. No. 80510 . Legal Number 6708 Legal Cle , S th ounty Journal Subscribed and sworn before on this day of0C1— , 18 / ‘` �p•E.••N yti���i Notary Public of the State of Washington ♦ O .•,,SSION • G i 'o��` � �;$*••• � residing in Renton • NOTARY FN •.• King County, Washington _._ • pu , C Nr N�•y 9� • L' B H0 :. '� �. i,�1/'0"WA f,N��6``p CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OCTOBER 26, 1999 AGENDA COMMENCING AT 9:00 AM, COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 7TH FLOOR, RENTON CITY HALL The application(s) listed are in order of application number only and not necessarily the order in which they will be heard. Items will be called for hearing at the discretion of the Hearing Examiner. PROJECT NAME: 10:00 AM Renton High School Modernization PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-99-120,SA,V PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Proposal for modernization of the existing Renton High School. The east wing would be removed for construction of a new 16,500 square foot Auditorium/Performing Arts Center. There would be extensive interior modernization of the principal school building, Building "A". The project would include systems upgrades and minor alterations to the Gymnasium/Food Service Commons building, Building "B". The existing Vocational building at the north end of the site may be used for interim classrooms during construction, but would be utilized for central warehouse/food storage after completion of the project. The proposal would revise existing access and parking areas. A new student and event parking area (203 parking spaces)would be developed in the east portion of the site. A new bus access and related loading area would also be constructed in this area of the site. A small visitor parking/drop off area would be added adjacent to the main school and Auditorium/Performing Arts Center. The existing road between the school and playfields would be utilized for separate parking areas at the north and south • ends, eliminating through traffic. The proposal requires approval of two (2)variances from development standards of the Center Downtown (CD)zone. The proposed Performing Arts Center would exceed the maximum setback of 25 feet for buildings over 25 feet in height. The Performing Arts Center is setback approximately 75 feet from S. 2nd Street. The applicant also requests variance approval from the minimum 10-foot wide landscape strip required along streets. The proposal maintains the existing 5-foot wide landscape strip on the subject property along the S. 2nd Street frontage. The variance requests would be reviewed by the Hearing Examiner concurrent with the site plan review. Location: 400 South Second Street. Agnda • REVISIONS I.. -. M ii Iti I 'I'INN,I Illlllllplgtl�llllil - HII�II 1 �l • i �I r• .1i 7 r r r r '?r'?w�r +.r ..rt. ?r..;�� � 'r� .. E. PP I - HI E. 00...,:,.,T ,II S• IAI IH _ VII ..„ t: r ._r. 0000 E i II 2222 2222 1 0000�oo oo 0000 13 O EAST ELEVoATION 1 r .a.as am• I Il Irk IIIIII ill: Or •• +i• I; co rz 1 MINI tili� ���i a _ LB © •. _ _ � �O I b rr r r,7. ,?rrr ,.r1 i r• .. :—_f— - --- ---- ----- _ 25- • 8 ai r Midi: J� it t .. t. ,�.. • o 117,. __ ,NIinlill :iiIHI ----itslia -..--.__.� .r_r • 000 ; Jr.xr.d?!,?7r?r7dlrr?!??i;r _..- - Z I- � r ,r �� fib— -- 5_ W W 3 yam ' _ i `a .=`.--,. _ _ su"�' 13 mwr.wo M . �'rr ;,'„ iitlliillii ■liii MIN Mil —mom EE7E tit tli Iti ' in Hi! I t!I ,r � � 0 EAST Iro r ELEVA-oTION _ 1_9, ` MATERIALS LEGEND _ iial«Muir r.,.oum..0 r..rm CP.OILR .a 2-96092 nu uEv-4 ONAM ad. Eii{,Mg ' ',li'ii�, w...c.rm rrr m.c oso®GO e-re-99 EigKM. ..,,.. .-,-N.. A ELEVATIONS 4 .--.�...+...^- SCALE:Ur-Y-0• d . tee . •i• 1'= :::i: ali ' L�.IIA�I _ I� _ mom= II •.D;,,,, ,. 2'sel pI - !� Ili g — • `III I I` • r� 1 Ell! 9 :lilt?. El 116III = :_ =I0 =ill= C IEIIN : MN MINI • • OWEST COURTYARD ELEVATION • Scale: ix-r-D• 110111.6. ~ e-- I I I ` • • :.I. I i o 11 1 .I : Efl I } G t! ' . 1 �k tx}.-It�� illilri i! ] ,..1.4 T- t} it JS ,F...i I I ..... ..... ....... . U)- N N #' t}i;! L:: r t t!I1 t:'. : 3 1 i 1 1 •, Is �S if!1L h.I iilEai �..... A C O i it::ii 111 i(( 1'r 1, 1i 1 Ij `I f ! I 1►1 e�ii/1 i!i Irf (!Q I i I 1k lil.l�l1 II tIl Ill It, I:i 11 Ii -_.__..�, 8 Z o d t ' Z,n N go= ; .°° • 5 I—O 0 EAST COURTYARD ELEVATION scd« t/e•-r-o• MATERIALS LEGEND SUM 1.0 nu nEV-e coma YR . III,, oD.,D • "' ': K.K.n. .o �K. a V o .,.. A .—...:.....,. ELEVATIONS 5 SCALE:1,S•-T-ce (REVISIONS ' •. • :, Alt :u!i II:— _ . — �- 1 t. ji s tg t. d i•'1ii E1 II,x:!:u::{;{: 4 .:.:i':: {'r t,.r ,tI - ;1 �.r — 1= u = iFli i,.-, EH.i:} Iif i:::. \' // \. - \/ /, �/ �/ . , � ' - -1, 1` • . \..' 1 1 v I11 . :, ,, r , t/ 'lI 1 ,, f_ ,11 ,i. 1,; i. , !.... 1, , r11,.. 1- -11-..-11,...:1 :II. . ,1„1,:=,_. 11 i � �. 1. iI}iT � !'at- t t lF . � I .»:� • g',t OWEST ELEVATION f E , _m, m ■m O0 ro 1 li 1 00,A A.., rt,p. ,• o'- an 1111 pi = t _ � � .Ei ± ±H[ - i1F Ril l �� = uo = F L L will III ' H i1 it ;i f;-�, , w z z 8 1 CC CC W l'afflm• 1 III i III m iii ui mil �� . � I I MATERIALS LEGEND OWEST ELEVATION 't�tw-.- 2 ,. _ :..b...a .� ortrt Imo:«._.., sum.: .o s-.eo.z EUV-. IM 0.001U III' li m''''''''Kr,.m.c totAloo am YR CatGJO ..rt .-16-99 SIVCCO • A ELEVATIONS 6 u vE ....�.....,. SCALE: .-I.-0. RENTON HIGH SCHOOL MODERNIZATION pp VARIANCE REQUEST CRITERIA 4,f F�1r FILE: LUA 99-120 007 pFRFNTa NNE l`179 N 'yc 9 1. The Renton School District is seeking a variance to Code Section 4-2-120B, Page 2-1 which allows a maximum front yard/street setback of 25-feet for buildings over 25-feet in height, in the CD zone. a. The east wing of the existing school is scheduled for demolition and a new auditorium/theater will be built in its place. The facility systems and ancillary support spaces are being upgraded by community/City contribution to equip the facility to also function as a community Performing Arts Center(P.A.C.). Because of the importance of this space to the programs and function of the high school, the new construction must be located with a strong, efficient connection to the existing 1931 structure. This necessitates locating the new building on a corridor access connecting the two structures which sites the P.A.C. 82-feet setback from the property line compared to the 96-foot setback of the existing 1931 structure. This additional setback not only more sympathetically diverts attention to and honors the historical significance of Renton's original high school and one of the City's best looking buildings, but also provides an opportunity to locate an off-street drop-off and short term parking area, which is a great traffic safety improvement compared to the existing pull-over lane with space for 3-4 cars. b. The granting of this variance would allow the new structure to maintain a setback situation that has existed at this location for 68-years. The school campus has always maintained a park-like atmosphere in this setback area promoting a refreshing, light, open air, tree-lined boulevard complementing the large historical nature of the structure. A building of this nature and size is not overpowering as it might normally be if it were not located as it is to maximize the distance of approach. The setback and location have always produced an appropriate distance by which one can admire the scale, proportion, order, rhythm, and style of the architecture. c. The historical nature of the facility merits special consideration as this situation is unlike any of its neighboring properties. In consideration to the surrounding properties, the building scale is proportional to the site size and the setback is an appropriate factor in this relationship, therefore, this setback should be granted. f Variance Request Criteria Page Two d. The requested and indicated setback is minimal and appropriate if the community is at all interested in maintaining the visual impact of the historical nature of the site to optimal advantage. The efficiency of the connection and function of the new structure to the 1931 structure would also be severely compromised if the setback were not granted. 2. The Renton School District is seeking a variance to Code Section 4-2-120B, Page 2-155, which requires a minimum landscaping width along streets of 10-feet in the CD zone. a. The sidewalk in question was an existing situation at the time the Code was written and is not indicated as part of the new work on the submitted plans. The only new work in the area is the addition of the drop-off lane/short term parking in the area of the entry to the school and the Performing Arts Center. The sidewalk is in good condition at its non-conforming location and the expense of relocating it 4-feet north was not budgeted and is not an effective use of tax dollars targeted toward educational support facilities. The present amount of landscaping in the building setback area and tree lined boulevard already creates a soft, park-like setting for the building which should more than satisfy the intent of the Code. b. Granting the variance will allow the District to maintain as much of the "original" building and site work as practical, maintaining one of the City's best examples of gracious, elegant building settings. It maintains more than the desired landscape open space to soften the street and sidewalk paving in its existing condition. c. Approval will allow this pre-existing condition to remain and maintain the popular setting of this historical community building. We think any building situation such as this deserves no less consideration. d. This is indeed a minimal impact non-conforming situation and would, as a variance, also be minimal. Plug 4 - A , 3 Title 197 WAC ECOLOGY, DEPARTMENT OF (COUNCIL ON, ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY) Chapter 197-11 WAC SEPA RULES WAC 197-11-970 Determination of nonsignificance (DNS). O� C0pA, ENTP WAC 197-11-970 Determination of nonsignificance (DNS). Off,T1 RFN ONNI - 1999 DETERMINATION OF N0NSIGNIFICANCE C . Description ofproposal The project consists of the modernization of the existing 320,00 square foot Renton High School which was built in phases from 1931 through 1969 and which housed as many as 3200 students in the 1970s. The project will remove the existing east wing (the "Junior High" constructed in 1941) and replace it with a new (Over Proponent RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 403 Location of proposal, including street address, if any Renton High School 400 South 2nd Street Renton, WA 98055 Lead agency RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 403 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030 (2) (c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. 0 There is no comment period for this DNS. This DNS is issued after using the optional DNS process in WAC 197-11-355. There is no further comment period on the DNS. EX This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by Responsible official RICK STRACKE Position/title Phone EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, FACILITIES & OPERATIONS 425-204-4403 Address 1220 North 4th Street, Renton, WA 98055 Date Signature 8/27/ 9 (OPTIONAL) fcl You may appeal this determination to (name) RICK STRACKE at (location) Renton School Dist. No. 403, Facilities & Operations no later than (date) 9/14/99 1220 North 4th Street by (method) Written Renton, Wa 98055-1539 You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. .../om_cgi.exe?clientlD=65629765&hitsperheading=on&infobase-wac.nfo&jump=197-11-970&s 8/12/99 ).GFRFN TINNING lacc Oer 1 1999 NOTICE OF DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE �O Renton School District No. 403 issued a determination of nonsignificance (DNS) under the State Environmental Policy Act Rules (Chapter 197-11 WAC) for the selected demolition, restoration, reconfiguration, and modernization of Renton High School proposed by Renton School District No. 403. After review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the agency, Renton School District No. 403 has determined this proposal will not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. Copies of the DNS and Environmental Checklist are available at no charge from Renton School District No. 403, 1220 North 4th Street, Renton, WA 98055. The public is invited to comment on this DNS by submitting written comments no later than September 15, 1999 to Rick Stracke at the above address. OELOPMENT CITY pF RENTONNING OCT12 1999 RECEI VEp STATE OF WASHINGTON - KING COUNTY 109536 —ss. Renton School District 4/403 No. HIGH SCHOOL. Affidavit of Publication RENTON SCHOOL The undersigned, on oath states that he is an DISTRICT#403 ,r4e, authorized representative of The Daily Journal of Commerce, a NOTICE OF t DETERMINATION OF`' �J daily newspaper, which newspaper is a legal newspaper of general NONSIGNIFICANCE,i' circulation and it is now and has been for more than six months RENTON SCHOOL TRICT NO. 403 issued a (Mai prior to the date of publication hereinafter referred to, published in mination of nonsignifictr e the English language continuously as a daily newspaper in Seattle, (DNS) under the State Envif a- mental Policy Act Rules (CFigic.: King County, Washington, and it is now and during all of said time ter 197-11 WAC)for the selected was printed in an office maintained at the aforesaid place of DEMOLITION, RESTORA- TION, RECONFIGURATIQN,; publication of this newspaper. The Daily Journal of Commerce AND MODERNIZATION ..OF! was on the 12th day of June, 1941, approved as a legal newspaper RENTON HIGH SCHOOL" Q- bythe Superior Court of KingCounty. by RENTON SCHOOL' P DISTRICT NO. 403. After re- view of a completed enviiim- mental checklist and other•...in- The notice in the exact form annexed, was published in regular formation on file with the aien- cy, RENTON SCHOOL D issues of The Daily Journal of Commerce, which was regularly TRICT NO. 403 has determined I distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The this proposal will not hav,e al annexed notice, a probable significant adverse,m}-I pact on the environment. Copies of the DNS and Envi- ronmental Checklist are PMDNS:94398/REMTON able at no charge from KR,gN TON SCHOOL DISTRICT:NO. 403, 1220 NORTH 4th STRE,E%, was published on RENTON, WA 98055. The.p}I- lic is invited to comment on iss 1 DNS by submitting w it�ttgn 08/31/99 comments no later than Sep- tember 15, 1999 to Rick Strack "p! at the above address. Date of'publication in the--Se- attle Daily. Journal of Com- merce,August 31, 1999. 8/31(109586) The amount of the fee charged for for•goin: publication is the sum of 3 , which ou •a •een paid in full. Subs ibed and sworn to before me on 08/31/99hvovA Notary Public for the State of Washington, residing in Seattle Affidavit of Publication Vff1 -• L N O O C RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT NO.403 . 5 0 Capital Projects Office � 1220 North 4th Street O ` Iti'll Renton, WA. 98055-1539 il.:o z v xiTelephone (425)204-4475 ' T n Facsimile (425)204-4476 CA'. y �.d,,,,NtuluN",� L403 document transmittal '. To: City of Renton Tel: (425)430-7219 Development Services Division—Development/Planning ATTN: Mr.Peter Rosen, Senior Planner Fax: (425)430-7300 From: Jack Connell Date: 10/12/99 Re: RENTON HIGH SCHOOL—MODERNIZATION Site Plan Review/Variance Request Criteria 2. — FILE: LUA 99-120 n 0 O ') CC: Rick Stracke m J► 0 fm 2 0%2 Documents Transmitted: 14 2 • One(1)copy of Variance Request Criteria, consisting of two(2) pages regarding maximum allowable setback and landscape setback requirements in the CD zone. • One(1)copy of WAC 197-11-970, Determination of nonsignificance (DNS)Form, completed for the Renton High School -Modernization Project, and dated 08/27/99. • One(1)copy of the text of the published"Notice of Determination of Nonsignificance." • One(1)copy of the"Affidavit of Publication"of the"Notice of Determination of Nonsignificance"for the Renton High School Modernization Project. Notes: Per our telephone conversation last Thursday,attached is the written criteria supporting the granting of both Variances requested by your department. I have also included copies of the SEPA process forms that we had earlier discussed. Please call if you have any questions or need additional information. I •. -K4 CITY JF RENTON .. . 11% Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator October 8, 1999 Mr. Jack Connell Renton School District 1220 N. 4th Street Renton, WA 98055 SUBJECT: Renton High School Modernization Project No. LUA-99-120, SA-H,V-H Dear Mr. Connell: As I discussed with you by telephone, the Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application requires two variances from development standards of the Center Downtown (CD)zone. The proposed Performing Arts Center would exceed the maximum setback of 25 feet for buildings over 25 feet in height. The Performing Arts Center is setback approximately 75 feet from S. 2nd Street. The CD development standards also require a minimum 10-foot wide landscape strip required along streets. The proposal maintains the existing 5-foot wide landscape strip on the subject property along the S. 2nd Street frontage. Please supplement your existing application submittal with a justification for the variances, according to the decision criteria in Section 4-9-250.B.5.,which I faxed to you yesterday. The variance requests will be reviewed in a public hearing before the Hearing Examiner concurrent with the site plan review. Please note that the public hearing has been delayed one week, to October 26. In order to maintain this hearing date, please submit your variance justification by October 12. Please contact me, at (425)430-7219, if you have any questions. Sincerely, e*e, Peter Rosen Project Manager cc: Guy Overman, Northwest Architectural Co. revisedaoo.doc 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, Washington 98055 65 This oaoer contains 50%recycled material.20%post consumer NOTICE OF REVISED PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, Washington, on October 26, 1999 at 9:00 AM to consider the following petitions: RENTON HIGH SCHOOL MODERNIZATION LUA-99-120.SA-H,V-H Proposal for modernization of the existing Renton High School. Location: 400 South Second Street. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Development Services Division, Sixth Floor, City Hall, Renton. All interested persons are invited to be present at the Public Hearing to express their opinions. Publication Date: October 12, 1999 Account No. 51067 ihexpubrevised CJ0$1`Y 44rP NOTICE OF APPLICATION REVISED OCTOBER B.1999 A Master Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NUMBER/NAME: LUA-99-120,SA-H,V-H/RENTON HIGH SCHOOL MODERNIZATION PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Proposal for modernization of the existing Renton High School. The east wing would be removed for construction of a new 16.500 square foot Auditorium/Performing Ans Center. There would be extensive interior modernization of the principal school building.Building W. The project would include systems Sery Vocational onal buildingdes and or at the alterations end of the se may be Gymnasium/Food d for'nter Commons im classroomsbuilding, during cBuilding structtiion,but The would existing be utilized for central warehouse/food storage after completion of the project. The spaces)would be existing proposal would revise developed in the east portion olathe site`As new bus accessna d drelated I adingevent parkinga eaareawould also Ibe constructed in this area of the site.A small visitor parking/drop off area would be added adjacent to the main school and Auditorium/Performing Ans Center.The existing road between the school and playlields would be utilized for separate parking areas al the north and south ends.eliminating through traffic. The proposal requires approval of Iwo(2)variances from development standards of the Center Downtown(CD)zone. The proposed Performing Ans Center would exceed the maximum setback of 25 feet for buildings over 25 feel In height. The Performing Ads Center is setback approximately 75 feet from S.2n4 Street. The applicant also requests variance apstrip foot roval widefrom the landsapetnimum strip on thfoot wide e subject landscape along the S.ed 2"a°loSntreetefrontage. The variance requestsewxisting 5- ould be reviewed by the Hearing Examiner concurrent with the site plan review. The Renton School District is assuming lead agency status and will be conducting the Environmental Review(SEPA)on the subject application. PROJECT LOCATION: 400 South Second Street PUBLIC APPROVALS: Site Plan Review,Variance Approval—Hearing Examiner Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Mr.Peter Rosen,Project Manager,Development Services Division,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on October 22,1999. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail,contact Mr.Rosen at (425)430-7219. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. This matter is scheduled for a public hearing on October 26,1999 at 9:00 AM,Council Chambers,Seventh Floor, Renton City Hall,1055 South Grady Way,Renton. II you are interested in attending the hearing,please contact the Development Services Division,(425)430-7282,to ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled. If comments cannot be submitted In writing by the date indicated above,you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments on the proposal before the Hearing Examiner. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional information by mail,contact Mr.Rosen at(425)430-7219. I PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION DATE OF APPLICATION: August 20,1999 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: September 2,1999 DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: September 2,1999 Revised September 18 1999 Revised October8, 199£ I1, 4 Fr lit. ww d i k 7-3-" a , t r` a FllrT 41 CERTIFICATION • I, �VJ�z 1 },� , hereby certify that copies of the above • document were posted by me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on (Q l R- (9ct Signed: _ ATTEST: Subcribed an sworn before me, a Nortary Public;in and for the State of Washington residing in , on the l Z f k day of 0.1 rfA • MARILYN K4 CHEFF • 77 OL a2 yt NOTARY PUBLIC • STATE OF WASHINGTON COMMISSION EXPIRES • JUNE 2,2003 MARILYN KAMCHEFF r, .. .w.. . MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES:6-29-03 JY�t October 7, 1999 covag Bruce E.Blackmer,AIA Mr. Peter Rosen Dole S.Brookie,AIA City of Renton Robert J.Grossman,AIA Planning & Land Services Colin R.Jones,AIA 1055 South GradyWayA.Fred King,AIA Steven J McNutt,AIA Renton, WA 98055 R.G.Nelson,AIA Benson A.Nielsen,AIA RE: Renton High School Modernization #2-98092-4Da William M.Podobnik,AIA g Richard A.Salogga,AIA City File#LUA-99-120 Gregory J.Stack,AIA SUBJ: Revised Site Review Application Keith M.Comes,AIA William W.Rash,AIA Bruce B Turner,PE Dear Mr. Rosen: Please find the attached documents, which revise the original Site Review Application to include (4) future classroom portables. This submittal consists of the following: 1. Project Narrative Revised — (11) copies. The fifth paragraph of this narrative, describing the future portables, is new. 2. Site Plan, Sheet A1.0 — (11) copies, (1) colored copy, (1) PMT. Revised to indicate future portable locations. 3. Conceptual Landscape Plan, Sheet L1.0 — (11) copies, (1) colored copy, (1) PMT. Revised to indicate future portable locations. Please call me at(206)441-4522 if you have any questions regarding this submittal. Sincerely, DEVELOPMENT PL gNN1NG Steve McConnell, RA C�n'OFRENTON Project Architect SE r & 1999 RECEwc Enclosures D cc: Jack Connell, Renton School District N:\2-98092\4\D\4Da-RevSiteReviewCoverLetter-991005.doc Offices in Seattle,Spokane, and Coeur d'Alene 2201 Sixth Avenue Suite 1405 Seattle,Washington 98 1 2 1-1 832 TEL 206-441-4522 FAX 206-441-7917 EMAIL nac@nwarchco com WEBSITE www.nwarchco com NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, Washington, on October 19, 1999 at 9:00 AM to consider the following petitions: RENTON HIGH SCHOOL MODERNIZATION LUA-99-120,SA-H Proposal for modernization of the existing Renton High School. Location: 400 South Second Street. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Development Services Division, Sixth Floor, City Hall, Renton. All interested persons are invited to be present at the Public Hearing to express their opinions. The project manager is Peter Rosen, (425)430-7219. Publication Date: October 8, 1999 Account No. 51067 hexpub (6) ,,, ..„,,,,,,,y. NOTICE OF APPLICATION A Mester Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NUMBER/NAME: LUA-99-120,SA-H I RENTON HIGH SCHOOL MODERNIZATION PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Proposal for modernization of the existing Renton High School. The east wing would be removed for construction of a new 18,500 square foot Auditorium/Performing Arts Center. There would be extensive interior modernization of the principal school building,Building W. The project would Include systems upgrades and minor alterations to the Gymnasium/Food Service Commons building. Building'W. The existing Vocational building at the north end of the site may be used for intenm classrooms during construction,but would be utilized for central warehouse/food storage after completion of the project. The proposal would revise existing access and parking areas. A new student and event parking area(203 parking spaces)would be developed in the east portion of the site.A new bus access and related loading area would also be constructed In this area of the site.A small visitor parking/drop off area would be added adjacent to the main school and AudiorlumlPenonning Arts Center.The existing road between the school and playlields would be utilized for separate parhi g areas at the north and south ends,eliminating through traffic. The Renton School District is assuming lead agency status and will be conducting the Environmental Review(SEPA)on the subject application. PROJECT LOCATION: 400 South Second Street PUBLIC APPROVALS: Site Plan Review—Hearing Examiner Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Mr.Peter Rosen,Project Manager,Development Services Division.1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on October 1,1999. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail,contact Mr.Rosen at (425)430-7219.Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. This matter is scheduled for a public hearing on October 19,1999 at 9:00 AM,Council Chambers.Seventh Floor, Renton City Hall.1055 South Grady Way,Renton. If you are interested in attending the hearing,please contact the Development Services Division,(425)430-7282,to ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled. If comments cannot be submitted in writing by the date indicated above,you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments on the proposal before the Hearing Examiner. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional information by mail,contact Mr.Rosen at(425)430-7219. !PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION J DATE OF APPLICATION: August 20,1999 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: September 2,1999 DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: \,otember 5..19�r9yy9 Re ised SeppleAmb 18,1999 iif4P�iiAI 1,.. - 'f 7 7 al1 `�. .,4 l:i ( �Y • f 'f� 1�1 Ti a. 4 ''I a '✓ r .l vt .e;,- I•' 4). rsf9F -:i r ( `. INNk • CERTIFICATION I, � ICCIIotci , hereby certify that copies of the above document were posted by me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on >1 ni%3eY1--- I(P i I r i G 9 • Signed: ,�,—ATTEST: Subcribed ` 1 ,worn before me, a Nortary Public,krin-tor 1 e State of Washington residing 40,i ram_ , on the 3r)77.,day of ,,• 14 15 . • / / J &irn NOTARY KAA�CHEFF 4 G�'� OTA: PURL I N STATE OF WASHINGTI MARILYN KAMCHEFF COMMISSION EXPIRES MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES:6-29-03 JUKE 21, 2pp3 + jifie + .0 NOTICE OF APPLICATION A Master Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NUMBER/NAME: LUA-99-120,SA-H/RENTON HIGH SCHOOL MODERNIZATION PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Proposal for modernization of the existing Renton High School. The east wing would be removed for construction of a new 16,500 square foot Auditorium/Performing Arts Center. There would be extensive interior modernization of the principal school building, Building "A". The project would include systems upgrades and minor alterations to the Gymnasium/Food Service Commons building, Building "B". The existing Vocational building at the north end of the site may be used for interim classrooms during construction, but would be utilized for central warehouse/food storage after completion of the project. The proposal would revise existing access and parking areas. A new student and event parking area (203 parking spaces)would be developed in the east portion of the site. A new bus access and related loading area would also be constructed in this area of the site. A small visitor parking/drop off area would be added adjacent to the main school and Auditorium/Performing Arts Center. The existing road between the school and playfields would be utilized for separate parking areas at the north and south ends,eliminating through traffic. The Renton School District is assuming lead agency status and will be conducting the Environmental Review(SEPA) on the subject application. PROJECT LOCATION: 400 South Second Street PUBLIC APPROVALS: Site Plan Review—Hearing Examiner Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Mr. Peter Rosen, Project Manager, Development Services Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton,WA 98055, by 5:00 PM on October 1, 1999. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail,contact Mr. Rosen at (425)430-7219. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. This matter is scheduled for a public hearing on October 19, 1999 at 9:00 AM, Council Chambers, Seventh Floor, Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton. If you are interested in attending the hearing, please contact the Development Services Division, (425) 430-7282, to ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled. If comments cannot be submitted in writing by the date indicated above, you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments on the proposal before the Hearing Examiner. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional information by mail,contact Mr.Rosen at(425)430-7219. PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION DATE OF APPLICATION: August 20, 1999 J I NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: September 2,1999 cP LICAT ;,� _ e r r 2, 1`9�r •Revised S 16, 1999 ' ;, DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLx1ICATION: September 2, 1999 Revise_d SeptemberU _ , D V .. ...4 - 7 4,. p ..2,,,tip*. 04).-lo V\ • .. i i1 p0 O _�11.�I � y, Pfd 7 F L�; ^� - •fd..J y I- �6 I — .�-.a I.;fr C 1 '�!'Rit T ; •i.iy \ /l \ �-r I 7'�"i I.""�r Snn"� 3����*9T'l1hII111111.J' h' q r r .+ r �'f /.,` �C i�. .9 8• i EI..'s il`'�i, ,h,, � 3". ' �L ;I,•rt+ ,' : •, • L.•y,1/ r, � \\1\ b • 7.i , '!it :44 ' / \ c,5 F',711—.147,7•',"k.7.-41.)15;,;:All%7f1 .-,' .°7•.;4" 4,... • . '''°' ....V. -—---'': '' •. appnotice lzls 1 , HT TKOWashington State Northwest Region Department of Transportation 15700 Dayton Avenue North P.O. Box 330310 Sid Morrison Seattle,WA 98133 9710 Secretary of Transportation (206)440-4000 September 17, 1999 Peter Rosen JEV�pMENT PLA NN1N`' art OF RENTO City of Renton 1999 Development Services Division SEA' , 1055 S Grady Way RECEIVED Renton, WA 98055-3232 RE : LUA-99-120,CU-H Renton High School Modernization Dear Mr. Rosen: Thank you for giving us the opportunity to review the Notice of Application for the Renton High School Modernization, which is located at 400 South Second Street in Renton. We have reviewed the subject document and have no comments. The project will not have significant impact on the state highway system. If you have any questions,please call John Collins at(206)440-4915. Sincerely, F02 raig J. Stone, P.E. Area Administrator- South King CJS:jc JTC cc: file CITY OF RENTON PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: September 6, 1999 TO: Jennifer Toth Henning FROM: Gail Reed,Airport Manager SUBJECT: Renton High School Performing Arts Center The Environment Checklist, submitted by the Renton School District for the Renton High School performing arts center, indicates that two structures will be demolished,the two story Junior High building and the 48 foot tall smoke stack. The smoke stack and the lightning rod atop the stack is presently listed as an obstruction at the south end of the airport. The height to the top of the stack and lightning rod is 134 feet above sea level,which is 105 feet above the airport elevation. The removal of this smoke stack is desired as it will increase safety for aircraft arriving to or departing from the airport. A departure runway safety area extends southward 1,000 feet from the south end of the runway. This safety area extends southward and upward from the runway end at a slope of 20:1. Care should be taken to insure that new construction does not extend above the slope of the safety area. cc: \\TS SERVER\SYS2\COMMON\C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\RHSPERFI.DOC City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 1'.0..Yk4 COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 16, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-120,CU-H DATE CIRCULATED: SEPTEMBER 2, 1999 APPLICANT: Renton School District PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen PROJECT TITLE: Renton High School Modernization WORK ORDER NO: 78573 LOCATION: 400 South Second Street SITE AREA: 25.84 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for modernization of the existing Renton High School. The east wing would be removed for construction of a new 16,500 square foot Auditorium/Performing Arts Center. There would be extensive interior modernization of the principal school building, Building "A". The project would include systems upgrades and minor alterations to the Gymnasium/Food Service Commons building, Building"B". The existing Vocational building at the north end of the site may be used for interim classrooms during construction, but would be utilized for central warehouse/food storage after completion of the project. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural • Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS 67,4 /Up ta ,"—e31 C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS ,6e>t.. 7Fe /t We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertis and have identified areas of probable impact or areas whert*additional information is nodded to properly as ess this proposal. }v Signature of Director or Authori ed Representative Dat roulingform Rev.10/93 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Wont ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 1%tkce COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 16, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-120,CU-H DATE CIRCULATED: SEPTEMBER 2, 1999 APPLICANT: Renton School District PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen PROJECT TITLE: Renton High School Modernization WORK ORDER NO: 78573 LOCATION: 400 South Second Street SITE AREA: 25.84 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for modernization of the existing Renton High School. The east wing would be removed for construction of a new 16,500 square foot Auditorium/Performing Arts Center. There would be extensive interior modernization of the principal school building, Building"A". The project would include systems upgrades and minor alterations to the Gymnasium/Food Service Commons building, Building "B". The existing Vocational building at the north end of the site may be used for interim classrooms during construction, but would be utilized for central warehouse/food storage after completion of the project. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet n �,,{ n,, 14,000 Feet o ac , i iu ICI( Ca\\3 B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. CUl• . Q(JSignature r•. or Authorized Representative Date routingform Rev.10/93 PROJECT LUA-99-120, CU,H • Renton High School Modernization City of Renton Department of Planning/ Building/ Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET (Continuation) POLICE RELATED COMMENTS No New Construction =No Additional Calls for Service CONSTRUCTION PHASE Theft from construction sites is one of the most common reported crimes in the city. To protect materials and equipment it is recommended that all materials and tools be locked up when not in use. The site will need security lighting and any construction trailer should be completely fenced in with portable chain-link fencing. The fence will provide both a physical and psychological barrier to any prospective thief and will demonstrate that this area is private property. Construction trailers should be kept locked when not in use, and should also have a heavy-duty deadbolt installed with no less then a 1-1/2" throw when bolted. Glass windows in the trailer should be shatter-resistant. I also recommend the business post the appropriate"No Trespassing" signs on the property while it's under construction(flier attached). This will aid police in making arrests on the property after hours if suspects are observed vandalizing or stealing building materials. Page 1 of 1 ...ri - �-� Trespass USINES Enforcement WATCH • Quite often, business owners and managers are faced with crimes that occur on the property after the businesses are closed and the employees have gone home. Some of the crimes that occur are burglary, vandalism, graffiti, trespassing, drug dealing and robbery in the parking lots. There is a way for police and business owners to discourage these types of crimes from taking place on private property, and that is by enforcing the City of Renton's Municipal Trespass Code 6-18-10. In order for police to be able to make an arrest for Trespass, business owners or managers need to purchase signs and display them in conspicuous areas on the property. These signs need to include the following language: 1. Indicate that the subject property is privately owned and; 2. Uninvited presence on the specified property is not permitted during the hours the business is closed, and; 3. Violators will be subject to criminal sanctions pursuant to Renton City Code 6-18-10. MOST IMPORTANTLY-THE SIGNS SHOULD BE CONSPICUOUS FROM ALL POSSIBLE POINTS OF ENTRY TO THE PROPERTY, AND ALSO BE PLACED ON THE EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDINGS. This way when a suspect is arrested, he/she will not be able to claim as a defense that he/she did not know he or she was trespassing. EXAMPLES FOR TRESPASS SIGNS: NO TRESPASSING NO TRESPASSING This is private property. Persons without specific No Trespassing after business hours business are not authorized to be on the premises between (insert specific times). Anyone on the the hours of(insert the hours your business is closed). premises after business hours is subject to Violators are subject to arrest and/or citation for criminal arrest and/or citation for Criminal Trespass pursuant to Renton City Code #6-18-10.. Trespass and/or impoundment of vehicle. Per Renton City Code #6-18-10. By enforcing the Trespass Ordinance, business owners and police will be sending a message to criminals that they are not allowed to conduct criminal activity on the property. In making arrests for Trespass, police may be preventing the more serious crimes from taking place. r COURTESY OF RENTON POLICE DEPARTMENT CRIME PREVENTION UNIT -N 235 - 2571 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public bvorres ENVIRONMENTAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: WV\o 1L IDeUckeiNkja0MMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 16, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-120,CU-H DATE CIRCULATED: SEPTEMBER 2, 1999 APPLICANT: Renton School District PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen PROJECT TITLE: Renton High School Modernization WORK ORDER NO: 78573 LOCATION: 400 South Second Street • SITE AREA: 25.84 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for modernization of the existing Renton High School. The east wing would be removed for construction of a new 16,500 square foot Auditorium/Performing Arts Center. There would be extensive interior modernization of the principal school building, Building "A". The project would include systems upgrades and minor alterations to the Gymnasium/Food Service Commons building, Building"B". The existing Vocational building at the north end of the site may be used for interim classrooms during construction, but would be utilized for central warehouse/food storage after completion of the project. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS c.Y t Sgut`3 . C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS Gt4Ccr(. i'& rl67-41>i1•-llc _ PLs1'YTFto&J M£icat7 A cail r".1.5-r At t1 14t-1r d7-c ra4c..-7 , We have reviewe this ap lication with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas whe additional inf ion t ed to properly assess this proposal. P5/39 Signature-6f ire or Authoriz ep sentative Date routingform Rev.10/93 i 70 -- co' A ao . , , ,, cp fl D 179 CI, -K - 83 d E '3 co o 0 7)C3[71:30 Diallo 0: P o 0 . 0C:2 II b 80,`" kil:E:n ti sifto) Cl . 4CI ❑ tb b O ❑pd NB ❑ o❑ !' in el D R 0 0 0 (1)E3_2.....9.46.4.d. .11! ;0501 G' \\ Ri h K> ...--- ) —---.. ...,-6-m-I-1-1 1 ,-... ,-,-. ...:-,moil/1i f _ ���!�► �w�%ram" ° % .. -:-�0 �;/1�4mialliaMI� . 1 -1P.!.....alqW/iibill1"- 4114111111Will___Ltill101 r�" ,orb ..,� .�-. 0011.14.7. orwrApoirocetp,4 , as ••••• -- - . .. w' '' --isIV __ _______-__i:„.. ... . •p=ri rial 11 I I Ivrc ...i....a a&.•0 ON I 0 III i•r 0 0 0 r 1 111 II I 11 I I I I a 1rJ 111N11 .I III irril I.1 1 I tirrill 10111-1614121101.1- 11111111 1111111 b..ri - l rzrgit —...."..--01-11"."---rn, 17- 0 in /1/// ris aro, i ___ ______- _, ,.., . -..- ■ ;..° fn.�Y � . • a - 3, . a ►Y . Y ,•0 �/1IIIASIVrrill - 11 --;!'�■ = W . ate- 11011111.11151111111161 .�.-� , Ili a .�i*� �6: ;fir ' 0111010 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: A-Wpol '— COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 16, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-120,CU-H DATE CIRCULATED: SEPTEMBER 2, 1999 APPLICANT: Renton School District PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen PROJECT TITLE: Renton High School Modernization WORK ORDER NO: 78573 LOCATION: 400 South Second Street SITE AREA: 25.84 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for modernization of the existing Renton High School. The east wing would be removed for construction of a new 16,500 square foot Auditorium/Performing Arts Center. There would be extensive interior modernization of the principal school building, Building "A". The project would include systems upgrades and minor alterations to the Gymnasium/Food Service Commons building, Building "B". The existing Vocational building at the north end of the site may be used for interim classrooms during construction, but would be utilized for central warehouse/food storage after completion of the project. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities — Animals Transportation XX Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet yes 14,000 Feet _y e s A Notice of Proposed Construction, FAA Form 7460-1, must be submitted. B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS The smoke stack on the High School property is listed as an obstruction by the FAA. The removal of the stack during the proposed project is welcomed by the Airport. There is not one-height limit, as mentioned in the application as being 90 feet. The height limit is lowest at the north end of the property and highest at the south end, on a 20: 1 slope. The Airport Runway Protection Zone extends south of the airport from the departure runway end a distance of 1,000 feet, as shown on the attached RPZ page. C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have v wed this ... ation with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas wh r a dition6n . ati•di needed to properly assess this proposal. • ed, Airport Manager Se R, 1QA9 Signature 'ector or Authorized Representative Date rouungform Rev.10/93 7,?:_.7::_.:::-,::::::_:._::::_::_,_,_-,__....__ . /. .. ILS'..;:i6,11) ' "" Q',A A E 0 r. _ _ __________ _ 63 ' 1,.f -_-_-__,=_-_-_-_-___,:_,___I .A Ili -ir-,5,... _____-_::::::::::::::::::::::::::::__ . Nail --H-H-:-:-:-:-:-_,::::::_=_:_:_:_,_:_:_:_:___ \ .i ,.,,:: 5.:•:.:-.,:_:-,:3,-,-„-,:::::::,::::::::-.,,,, ------ ------------- ----- — ------—=--= !�.! k Cif 22:111, 01w - \..... :111111110". •II PA.Po Illt .=--C. PIP,t-----\--., M.N =_—__====_—= _=___ = -= - =- = -== 'IkIIti, ,: =_ ' ''''''.-6:7---:-..-EZ-EEE-:::::_--E1-f-:::: ::__-- --EEEE:_::::_;---1:-.--iEEE:t.:.*.R.:;__---::::::::::_::-_1::::::_gl--.......E.:._:::: ----,--ZE:-F_•__:*1-_-:;", .."._ 1 •,,-i I 113 64. • '''. C I fr1111. .ija .. it,11..ti) L D- ' ==_=_=== ============= tEtE::::::::tE:::::-: g 1 tri,1 , • 1 .,, p- 6 1w1tlkc\i-1) mrrime N.... _1 ,,ter`s�f 1`-'\--\71 wi,71$ ,weq,,,zw:',' . s-cc.7.31..._:E.:::::::::::::-:::::__::::::::_.-±_::::--__-_-::::.:__:::_::::::::::::::-:::::::::::_:::::-:::-:::::FaV:: s‘ IR ,,, i i , •-• 15 ii;I', ,.1r; _i 2.. '-' -94 p. - id - NEN u• ibsr' o , ' Pill ?I EMI4 '".. us j 1 0-k". elj3.C:41 ''' ..2(',,f- tir 4 . . ,,\ .. v 017:Ito. 7t9,:, tili :I . . .c .LB7,--1,-: ;9$; •. ii ?ii l •1•pg ' \ �' .1� �� - •' iii�rl hf ip NE I,_ rR. V1‘01.4)1,mli [11111WWFIk , 1,.. ..„. 1Jt eri ll. Iv •- ��V �le1 i r- _DMA Aili X ■-la w-I �r , 1'. �N u �/1�'.1:`:k�111 u. • C�,.--.- `, _A. .Q,W c ,a wir joir :_ L o ®� 4'is :firm"s ..I - g. IN- irivri IUI M ®� ?:!: _ ,� ;i kipi�1 It l�1'.,. M N N Z-10® g0. Agipii N.-,41047.,f,ifc ,,,, , 1161.:112r-ilf . 1 - ---- . , •J: ___...."ipwall r.,. _ t ,.ii.r...t. 1:. - fiq hi\\,4,416.- 1 C JA, '---111.7,17!: :.- ./ -l'ikollit,474.11Eqr.m___:_..ii,:41- .r.-1. �n 1.0.11}i of air. P. • _ 8.1rf, iwolit. . 0 ;,,,N..... , ( ; 41111P a4§ I.eS 2 Y61.; . •� )'. 1 ■ 6 [ . 1 ,,, a i 1:""-;-A ‘ _ . \\• • A: WO � ,t. 1 p 4:a?",11. �• ` t �i ' ` t I __ .U . Ag •_• ._ ..N NI— i aJ —"Oa i 111,711.1.1°M ..T Ill 11,,,..I ,._,,‘ .--I ,i Ft,f,-,, , ILL I I P* -1 C° MI : 1 lilfigt:41.', '-'' 11 1 [I tri-iiikt al 1 I I/ gil'ii 1 E\,,\,-- s izoli-7., -0 . 1 F .i :1N} cC.l 1 Nw 1 ! __ F1-Hr {yy , �— Z...%1' !,U T;•.• E t 11 !,, , r�,l ,.,.. •� .-. •-• I N A d . .tA . an J.& ..„ IIJI , �1-�, gy EV.29' ELEV 29.5' EIEV.50' IRM EI 2.5°CUM(EM te'CIEAR(EN) "�+ 2e.s'CLEAR(E/ll) J a 'EL-� . 0 E 0 :I I I— c „,,„ L. 4 Li? 1 r . 11111 � I� &I j___ \ 1 x1fH • \� liTHO 1 i C3! 0 a EV.2e.e' Ci EIEv.26.9 Ll:: - - __-"4111 , frtIF ):* iJt ; : BLAST PM I N 0 n 1 JD . or E '1 O Eft 14I% AOORE PROPERTY-LET i 123'0.EM(EA))1T1T1 - ELEV.JI' TTTTTrl ibti 77 cIEAR(EN) LIEU 29' t 2.5°CLEAR(EN) RUNWAY 33 )w f • n it U.S.GPO:1993-0.347.827 fs 0 + .: ., ,... NOTICE OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OR ALTERATION §77.13 Construction or alteration requiring notice. §77.15 Construction or alteration not requiring notice. (a) Except as provided in §77.15, each sponsor who proposes any of the following No person is required to notify the Administrator for any of the following construc- construction or alteration shall notify the Administrator in the form and manner bon or alteration: prescribed in§77.17: (a) Any object that would be shielded by existing structures of a permanent and (1)Any construction or alteration of more than 200 feet in height above the ground substantial character or by natural terrain or topographic features of equal or greater level at its site. height, and would be located in the congested area of a city,town, or settlement (2)Any construction or alteration of greater height than an imaginary surface extending where it is evident beyond all reasonable doubt that the structure so shielded will outward and upward at one of the following slopes: not adversely affect safety in air navigation. (I) 100 to 1 for a horizontal distance of 20,000 feet from the nearest point of (b)Any antenna structure of 20 feet or less in height except one that would increase the nearest runway of each airport specified in subparagraph(5)of this paragraph the height of another antenna structure. with at least one runway more than 3,200 feet in actual length,excluding heliports. (c)Any air navigation facility, airport visual approach or landing aid, aircraft arrest- (ii) 50 to 1 for a horizontal distance of 10,000 feet from the nearest point of ing device, or meteorological device, of a type approved by the Administrator, or the nearest runway of each airport specified in subparagraph(5)of this paragraph an appropriate military service on military airports,the location and height of which with its longest runway no more than 3,200 feet in actual length,excluding heliports. is fixed by its functional purpose. (iii) 25 to 1 for a horizontal distance of 5,000 feet from the nearest point of (d)Any construction or alteration for which notice is required by any other FAA regulation. the nearest landing and takeoff area of each heliport specified in subparagraph (5)of this paragraph. §77.17 Form and time of notice. (3) Any highway, railroad, or other traverse way for mobile objects, of a height (a) Each person is to notify the under §77,13 (a) shall which,if adjusted upward 17 feet for an Interstate Highway that is part of the National (a)send oneerrs executed who form set requiredt FAA Form 7460 Administrator Notice of ProposedConstruction System of Military and Interstate Highways where overcross r are designed for or Alteration,to the Manager,Air Traffic Division,FAA Regional Office having jurisdiction a minimum of 17 feet vertical distance, 15 feet for any other public roadway, 10 over the area within which the construction or alteration will be located. Copies of feet or the height of the highest mobile object that would normally traverse the FM Form 7460-1 may be obtained from the headquarters of the Federal Aviation road, which aver is greater, for a private road, 23 feet for a railroad, and for a Administration and the regional offices. waterway or any other traverse way not previously mentioned, an amount equal to the height of the highest mobile object that would normally traverse it, would (b)The notice required under§77.13(a) (1)through (4) must be submitted at least exceed a standard of subparagraph(1)or(2)of this paragraph. 30 days before the earlier of the following dates— (4) When requested by the FAA, any construction or alteration that would be in (1)The date the proposed construction or alteration is to begin. an instrument approach area(defined in the FAA standards governing instrument (2)The date an application for a construction permit is to be filed. approach procedures)and available information indicates it might exceed a standard However, a notice relating to proposed construction or alteration that is subject to of Subpart C of this part the licensing requirements of the Federal Communications Act may be sent to the FAA at the same time the application for construction is filed with the Federal (5)Any construction or alteration on any of the following airports(including heliports): Communications Commission,or at any time before that filing. (i)An airport that is available for public use and is listed in the Airport Directory of the current Airman's Information Manual or in either the Alaska or Pacific (c)A proposed structure or an alteration to an existing structure that exceeds 2,000 Airman's Guide and Chart Supplement feet in height above the ground will be presumed to be a hazard to air navigation (ii)An airport under construction,that is the subject of a notice or proposal on and to result in an inefficient utilization of airspace and the applicant has the burden file with the Federal Aviation Administration, and except for military airports, it of overcoming that presumption.Each notice submitted under the pertinent provisions is clearly indicated that that airport will be available for public use. of Part 77 proposing a structure in excess of 2,000 feet above ground,or an alteration (iii)An airport that is operated by an armed force of the United States. that will make an existing structure exceed that height must contain a detailed showing directed to meeting this burden.Only in exceptional cases,where the FAA concludes (b) Each sponsor who proposes construction or alteration that is the subject of a that a clear and compelling showing has been made that it would not result in an notice under paragraph(a)of this section and is advised by an FAA regional office inefficient utilization of the airspace and would not result in a hazard to air navigation, that a supplemental notice is required shall submit that notice on a prescribed form will a determination of no hazard be issued. to be received by the FAA regional office at least 48 hours before the start of the construction or alteration. (d) In the case of an emergency involving essential public services, public health. or public safety,that requires immediate construction or alteration,the 30 day require- (c) Each sponsor who undertakes construction or alteration that is the subject of ment in paragraph (b) of this section does not apply and the notice may be sent a notice under paragraph(a)of this section shall,within 5 days after that construction by telephone, telegraph, or other expeditious means, with an executed FAA Form or alteration reaches its greatest height,submit a supplemental notice on a prescribed 7460-1 submitted within five (5) days thereafter. Outside normal business hours, form to the FAA regional office having jurisdiction over the area involved,if— emergency notices by telephone or telegraph may be submitted to the nearest FAA (1) The construction or alteration is more than 200 feet above the surface level Flight Service Station. of its site;or (e) Each person who is required to notify the Administrator by paragraph (b) or(c) (2) An FAA regional office advises him that submission of the form is required. of §77.13, or both, shall send an executed copy of FAA Form 7460-2, Notice of Actual Construction or Alteration,to the Manager,Air Traffic Division,FAA Regional Office having jurisdiction over the area involved. ADDRESSES OF THE REGIONAL OFFICES Western Pacific Region Southern Region Great Lakes Region New England Region HI,CA,NV,AZ,GU KY,TN,NC,SC,GA,AL, ND,WI,MI,SD,IL,OH,MN,IN MA,NH,VT,RI,CT,ME Western-Pacific Regional Office MS,FL,VI,PR Great Lakes Regional Office New England Regional Office Air Traffic Division,AWP-530 Southern Regional Office Air Traffic Division,AGL-530 Air Traffic Division,ANE-530 15000 Aviation Boulevard Air Traffic Division,ASO-530 2300 East Devon Avenue 12 New England Executive Park Hawthorne,CA 90260 3400 Norman Berry Drive Des Plaines,IL 60018 Burlington,MA 01803 Tel.310-297-1365 East Point,GA 30344 Tel.312-694-7568 Tel.617-273-7143 Mail Address: Tel.404-763-7646 Southwest Region Eastern Region AWP-530 Mail Address: NM,TX,OK,AR,LA NY,PA,WV,VA,DC,MD,DE,NJ P.O.Box 92007 Federal Aviation AdministrationWo Southwest Regional Office Eastern Regional Office Los Angeles,way PostalA Center Southern Regionali ASOffice Air Traffic Division,ASW-530 Air Traffic Division,AEA-530- Los CA 90009 Air Traffic Division,ASO 530 4400 Blue Mound Road JFK International Airport Alaskan Region Atl n�GA30320 Fort Worth,TX 76193 Fitzgerald Federal Building AK Tel.817-624-5534 Jamaica,NY 11430 Alaskan Regional Office Northwest Mountain Region Mail Address: Tel.718-553-1228 Air Traffic Division,AAL-530 WA,OR,MT,ID,WY,UT,CO Department of Transporation Fax:718-553-1384 222 West 7th Avenue Northwest Mountain Regional Office Federal Aviation Administration Anchorage,AK 99513 Air Traffic Division,ANM-530 Fort Worth,TX 76193-0530 Tel.907-271-5893 1601 Lind Avenue,SW Central Region Mailing Address: Renton,WA 98055-4056 NE,IA,MO,KS Federal Aviation Administration • Tel.206-227-2530 Office Alaskan Regional Office Fax:206-227-1530 Central RegionalIg :l Arc ran City of Re,rtu,i Department of Planning/Building/Public ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ''‘Ye Pre t 1�'t'�O'V COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 16, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-120,CU-H DATE CIRCULATED: SEPTEMBER 2NflitsfRE KEPT APPLICANT: Renton School District PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen AU PROJECT TITLE: Renton High School Modernization WORK ORDER NO: 78573 SF P n 3 19, LOCATION: 400 South Second Street - SITE AREA: 25.84 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for modernization of the existing Renton High School. The east wing would be removed for construction of a new 16,500 square foot Auditorium/Performing Arts Center. There would be extensive interior modernization of the principal school building, Building"A". The project would include systems upgrades and minor alterations to the Gymnasium/Food Service Commons building, Building 'B . The existing Vocational building at the north end of the site may be used for interim classrooms during construction, but would be utilized for central warehouse/food storage after completion of the project. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS No C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS s-QQ ctiLC.4 moo. q/3b, We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 7//t/ / /?? Signature of Director or Authorized I presentative Date ro gngform Rev.10/93 ' w CITY OF RENTON t`�Y O FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU AIN MEMORANDUM DATE: September 3, 1999 TO: Peter Rosen, Senior Planner FROM: Corey Thomas, Plans Review Inspector SUBJECT: Code-related comments for Renton High School 1 . The preliminary fire flow required is 4,000 gpm with one fire hydrant within 150- feet of the structure and three hydrants within 300-feet of the structure. A looped fire main is required to be installed around the building. Existing fire hydrants can be used if they are up to current standards or can be brought up to city standards by adding 5-inch storz fittings. 2. The fire mitigation fees are applicable at the rate of $0.52 per square foot of increased building area only, if any. 3. An approved fire sprinkler system is required to be installed throughout the building. An approved standpipe system is required in the building. 4. An approved fire alarm system is required to be installed throughout the building. 5. Fire access is required on the north side of the building in order to meet section 902.2.1 which requires access to within 150-feet of all points of the building. Roadways are required to be a minimum 20-feet wide with turning radius of 25-feet inside and 45-feet outside. CT:ct rhs CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: September 7, 1999 TO: Peter Rosen FROM: Arneta Henninger X7298 itij SUBJECT: RENTON HIGH SCHOOL 400 S 2ND ST APPLICATION I have reviewed the application for this proposed buildings generally located in Section 18- 23N-5E and have the following comments: SANITARY SEWER: • This project is not located in the Aquifer Protection Zone. • There is an 8" sanitary sewer main in S 2nd St. • There is a 12" and a 15" sanitary sewer main in S Tobin St. • There is a 8" sanitary sewer main in Logan Av S. • There is a 15" sanitary sewer main through the middle of the site. • The conceptual utility plan appears to be in order. • Any use in the building(s) subject to oils or grease shall require the installation of a grease interceptor or oil/water separator as determined at the time of plan review. • System Development Charges (SDC) are $0.078 per square foot. These fees are collected at the time a construction permit is issued. Please note that any parcel that currently has water and or sewer service is eligible for a prorated system development charge. Your project will be reviewed to determine how much redevelopment credit applies. WATER: • The site is not located in the Aquifer Protection Zone. • The project site is located in the 196 Pressure Zone. b. RENTON HIGH SCHOOL APPLICATION September 9, 1999 Page 2 of 3 • There is an existing 8" watermain in S 2nd St from Lake Av S to Whitworth Av S. • There is an existing 12" watermain in S 2nd St from Whitworth Av S to Burnett Av S. • There is an existing 8" watermain in Lake Av S. • There is an existing 12" watermain in S Tobin St. • There is an existing 10" watermain in Logan Av S. • There is an existing watermain through the middle of the site. The City does not have any records on this watermain. The applicant will need to verify the material and exact location of this watermain. This is important since one of the buildings will be required to tap into this main for the new sprinkler system. If the main is not in good condition and if it is smaller than an 8" it will need to be replaced by the applicant in order to utilize it for any additional water usage. • The watermain that is located on the easterly side of the site currently ends in a fire hydrant. This lead to the fire hydrant is 6" in diameter. If this fire hydrant is needed to meet the project site's fireflow requirements then this pipe will need to be replaced by the applicant and upsized to a minimum 8" in diameter. • Per the City of Renton Fire Marshall, the preliminary fire flow for this project is 4,000 GPM. (This includes credit given for a sprinkler system.) Any new construction must have one fire hydrant capable of delivering a minimum of 1,000 GPM and shall be located within 150 feet of the structure and two additional hydrants (also capable of delivering a minimum of 1,000 GPM) within 300 feet of the structure. This distance is measured along the travel route. • The water conceptual utility plan is not approved. The conceptual water utility plan does not take into account the above three notes. A new watermain extension may be required for this project. • The existing water service lines and/or meters may need to be relocated and/or upsized to comply with current City of Renton code. • Water System Development Charges of $0.113 per square foot gross area may be required if not previously paid. The Development Charges are collected as part of the construction permit. Please note that any parcel that currently has water and or sewer service is eligible for a prorated system development charge. Your project will be reviewed to determine how much redevelopment credit applies. STREET IMPROVEMENTS: • This project will not be required to do any street improvements for this site. • This project will not be required to do any additional street lights for this site. RENTON HIGH SCHOOL APPLICATION September 9, 1999 Page 3 of 3 DRAINAGE: • A conceptual drainage plan was submitted with the formal application for the project. It generally appears to be in order. A Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan shall be submitted for review and approval prior to any permits being issued for demolition or construction. • There are storm drainage facilities in S 2nd St. • There are storm drainage facilities in Lake Av S. • There are storm drainage facilities in S Tobin St. • There are storm drainage facilities in Logan Av S. • The Surface Water SDC fees of $0.129 (but not less than $385) per square foot of new impervious area may be required if not previously paid. GENERAL: • All required utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed Civil Engineer. • Permit application must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. The fee for review and inspection of these improvements is 5% of the first $100,000 of the estimated construction costs; 4% of anything over $100,000 but less than $200,000, and 3% of anything over $200,000. Half of the fee must be paid upon application for building and construction permits, and the remainder when the permits are issued. There may be additional fees for water service related expenses. See Drafting Standards. RENHSGF City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Plate ReVieI.°—U bt* COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 16, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-120,CU-H DATE CIRCULATED: SEPTEMBER 2, 1999 APPLICANT: Renton School District PROJECT MANAGER: Peter RosenE1/ELOPMENT SERVICES CITY Or RENTON PROJECT TITLE: Renton High School Modernization WORK ORDER NO: 78573 trm LOCATION: 400 South Second Street 511' U 3 19,9 SITE AREA: 25.84 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): EIVED SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for modernization of the existing Renton High School. The east wing would be removed for construction of a new 16,500 square foot Auditorium/Performing Arts Center. There would be extensive interior modernization of the principal school building, Building"A". The project would include systems upgrades and minor alterations to the Gymnasium/Food Service Commons building, Building "B". The existing Vocational building at the north end of the site may be used for interim classrooms during construction, but would be utilized for central warehouse/food storage after completion of the project. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS Jet 4_,---A----z-iii-----/--------d C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where ditional information� is ne ded to properly.assess this proposal. /i2y �11-- 1i't./ii / Signature of Director or Authorized Representa 7,r5 Date routingform Rev.10/93 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:5 ce; Wa..SictocItir COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 16, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-120,CU-H DATE CIRCULATED: SEPTEMBER 2, 1999 APPLICANT: Renton School District PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rose7iEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF RENTON PROJECT TITLE: Renton High School Modernization WORK ORDER NO: 78573 LOCATION: 400 South Second Street SEP 0 3 1999 SITE AREA: 25.84 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): RECEIVED SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for modernization of the existing Renton High School. The east wing woului ye removed for construction of a new 16,500 square foot Auditorium/Performing Arts Center. There would be extensive interior modernization of the principal school building, Building "A". The project would include systems upgrades and minor alterations to the Gymnasium/Food Service Commons building, Building "B". The existing Vocational building at the north end of the site may be used for interim classrooms during construction, but would be utilized for central warehouse/food storage after completion of the project. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare - Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services __ Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS -J-J2) , -v..--, We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where a itional information is needed to property assess this proposal. Q /y- Signature7iL �—/ /� Q `/of Di ctor or Authorized Repre6ftative Date routingform Rev.10/93 • City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:Mativ4,00-alurK� COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 16, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-120,CU-H DATE CIRCULATED: SEPTEMBER� OPMENT SERVICE APPLICANT: Renton School District PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen CITY OF RENTON PROJECT TITLE: Renton High School Modernization WORK ORDER NO: 78573 SEP 0 3 999- LOCATION: 400 South Second Street SITE AREA: 25.84 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): RECEIVED SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for modernization of the existing Renton High School. The east wing would be removed for construction of a new 16,500 square foot Auditorium/Performing Arts Center. There would be extensive interior modernization of the principal school building, Building"A". The pro ect would include systems upgrades and minor alterations to the Gymnasium/Food Service Commons building, Building "B". The existing Vocational building at the north end of the site may be used for interim classrooms during construction, but would be utilized for central warehouse/food storage after completion of the project. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where addition 'nformation is needed t properly assess this proposal. ,./5/2Y Signature of Director or Authorized Re resentative jr(/ ./ Date routingform Rev.10/93 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:Cowtyuc: S€v C. COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 16, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-120,CU-H DATE CIRCULATED: SEPTEMBER 2, 1999 APPLICANT: Renton School District PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY-CPRENTON PROJECT TITLE: Renton High School Modernization WORK ORDER NO: 78573 LOCATION: 400 South Second Street SEP 0 3 1999 SITE AREA: 25.84 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): RECEIVED SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for modernization of the existing Renton High School. The east wing would be removed for construction of a new 16,500 square foot Auditorium/Performing Arts Center. There would be extensive interior modernization of the principal school building, Building "A". The project would include systems upgrades and minor alterations to the Gymnasium/Food Service Commons building, Building "B". The existing Vocational building at the north end of the site may be used for interim classrooms during construction, but would be utilized for central warehouse/food storage after completion of the project. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water LightGlare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date routingform Rev.1C/93 CITY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION LIST OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS within 300 feet of the subject site PROJECT NAME: RENTON HIGH SCHOOL APPLICATION NO: LUA - . I7=0 k CU —t--f The following is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. The Development Services Division will notify these individuals of the proposed development. NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMB 4Op CM'04441- d PLEASE SEE ATTACHED LISTINGS 40 NTONti1S1iNO Fc ',999 (Attach additional sheets, if necessary) *********#***************#$####*###*#*1k##$#*+*****######****#*#*##****$**$****1 +- k BATCH NUMBER: EV COMMENTS �. k CUSTOMER NAME RENTONSCHOOLDIST 000720-0004-05 000720-0008-01 SAFEWAY INC 931653 BROZOVICH FRANK 6 DARLENE 459999 C/0 C P T S 01563 66 WILLIAMS AVE S 1850 MT DIABLO BLVD 0250 RENTON WA 98055 WALNUT CREEK CA 94596 000720-0013-04 000720-0014-03 CANIPAROLI LOUIS J 521121 MILLER BERTHA 081649 84 LOGAN AVE S 1307 N 32ND ST RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98056 000720-0015-02 000720-0016-01 MILLER BERTHA 081650 PROVIN WILLIAM D 910553 1307 N 32ND 81 LOGAN AVE S RENTON WA 98056 RENTON WA 98055 000720-0017-00 000720-0029-06 THARP JOHN J+JULIET J+WATAN269999 HARPER ENGINEERING CO, INC 799800 ARTHUR M 200 S TOBIN ST 423 S 3R0 ST RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 000720-0030-03 000720-0031-02 SALVATION ARMY THE 669999 EUMAN BESSIE M C1079 111 QUEEN ANNE AVE N 0300 220 S TOBIN AVE SEATTLE WA 98109 RENTON WA 98055 000720-0032-01 000720-0033-00 HAIGHT HARRY E LIVING TRUST339999 HEALY MARTIN+ANNE 679999 _ 61 SIIUTTUCK AVE S 314 S TOBIN ST RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 000720-0075-09 000720-0078-06 STARKOVICH RUC- 603840 OAGDAN RONILO A+ALMA M 82 810 N RIVERSIC )R _ _6 S TOBIN ST RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 000720-0080-02 000720-0114-02 HUNTER BILL 360833 ROOT ROBIN 7= 215 S TOBIN 20632 108TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98055 KENT WA 000720-0119-07 000720-0127-07 SAFEWAY INC ST4 1563 802198 FORREST CHRISTOPHER K 9= C/O CPTS 509 S TOBIN ST 1850 MT DIABLO BLVD Z250 RENTON WA WALNUT CREEK CA 94596 000720-0131-01 000720-0134-08 BAREI MRS UMBERTO REDMOND MARILYN L 43 322 S 15TH ST 2914 108TH AVE E RENTON WA 98055 PUYALLUP WA 5 000720-0141-09 000720-0144-06 CITY OF RENTON 772629 BIG FIVE HOLDINGS INC 34 200 MILL AVE S 2525 E EL SEGUNDO BOULEVARD RENTON WA 98055 EL SEGUNDO CA 9 000720-0148-02 000720-0155-02 STARKOVICH RUDY 603840 TEUNG YAOTA C+CHIOTA CHAO 93 810 N RIVERSIDE DR 11130 CORNELL AVE S RENTON WA 98055 SEATTLE WA 9 000720-0167-08 - 000720-0171-02 NICKELS PAUL. M 769999 MORTON BRENT 8 74 P 0 BOX 46405 827 NW 65TH ST SEATTLE WA 98146 SEATTLE WA 9 000720-0172-01 000720-0176-07 LIGHTFOOT JOSEPH+MARYLYN C 959999 TOBACCO THOMAS C+JANA 91 3300 ISLAND CREST WAY 1701 LAKE AVE S MERCER ISLAND WA 98040 RENTON WA 9 000720-0179-04 000720-0188-03 BIRD GLORIA E 831599 CITY OF SEATTLE PUBLIC UTIL88 8722 S 121ST WATER DEPARTMENT SEATTLE WA 98178 710 2ND AVE 9TH FL SEATTLE WA 9 000720-0211-04 000720-0213-02 SAFEWAY INC STORE 40489 820259 HOUSING AUTHORITY 83 C/O CPTS CITY OF RENTON 1850 MT DIABLO BLVD 4250 PO BOX 2316 WALNUT CREEK CA 94596 RENTON WA 9 182305-9067-09 182305-9070-04 DENNYS INC 840508 TONKIN FRANK J 06 RASH : 200-47-01920 3300 MAPLE VALLEY HWY PO BOX 1600 RENTON WA 9 182305-9080-0Z Id&505-Y111-04 WILSON GLADYS " 251491 .LIAMS BRUCE T 71 1414 MONROE AV JE tr106 i RAINIER AV S RENTON WA 98056 RENOTN WA 9 182305-9171-02 182305-9204-03 HSUE KWAI+LEE-YUH 079999 WITTERS M K 7515 SE 71ST 12820 84TH AVE S MERCER ISLAND WA 98040 SEATTLE WA 9 182305-9236-05 380600-0005-05 WARREN LAWRENCE J 809999 PASTOLERO EDWIN V 69 100 S 2ND ST 2568 S GRAHAM ST RENTON WA 98055 SEATTLE WA 9 380600-0010-08 380600-0015-03 HARPER 0 J 019999 GUDMUNDSON DARRELD J 91 200 S TOBIN 102 LAKE AVE S. RENTON WA 98055 RENTON, WA 9 380600-0025-01 380600-0040-02 PAGLIA ROSE ADELE 239999 ROBERTS J BERT 91 117 S TOBIN ST 10900 RAINIER AVE S RENTON WA 98055 SEATTLE WA 9 380600-0045-07 380600-0065-02 GUDMONDSON DARRELO J 344927 RENTON SCHOOL DIST 403 71 102 LAKE AVE S 435 MAIN AVE S RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 9 380600-0085-08 380600-0095-06 ALLERS-BAKER EVANGELINE R 504117 ALLERS-BAKER EVANGELINE R 50 6808 RAINIER AVE 6808 RAINIER AVE GIG HARBOR WA 98335 GIG HARBOR WA 9 380600-0115-02 380600-0120-05 GRAY MARY 609999 ALLERS-BAKER EVANGELINE R 50 25711 SE 208TH ST 6808 RAINIER AVE MAPLE VALLEY WA 98038 GIG HARBOR WA 9 569600-0010-06 569600-0030-02 RENTON RENAISSANCE APTS 949700 PERFECTION TIRE PARTNERSHIP43 LIMITED LIABILITY CO 205 LOGAN S 3316 FUHRMAN AVE E RENTON WA 9 SEATTLE WA 98102 ' 569600-0075-08 569600-0080-01 CITY OF RENTON 839700 CITY OF RENTON 83 200 MILL AVE SOUTH 200 MILL AVE SOUTH RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 9 569600-0085-06 569600-0090-09 JASPER LORRAINE G 869999 WILLIAMS THOMAS H 90 30925 WEBSTER RD E 13329 SE 253RD PL EATONVILLE WA 98328 KENT WA 9 569600-0140.09 569600-0145' RIFFLE GARY M+LINOA R 809999 RIFFLE GAkT M+LINOA R 809999 16846 188TH AVE SE 16846 188TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 RENTON WA 98058 569600-0150-06 569600-0155-01 LU KHANH CONG+HOA THI LU-V0902511 MUNSON RONALD W C 'ELIZABETH343751 13414 SE 85TH ST 8648 S 134TH ST RENTON WA 98056 SEATTLE WA •• 98178 569600-0160-04 569600-0165-09 RIVILY THOMAS A+MARGARET A 1N3598 PRINGLE EDITH E 876667 17035 300TH AVE NE PRINGLE ETHEL M DUVALL WA 98019 117 LOGAN AVE S RENTON WA 98055 569600-0169-05 569600-0170-02 KOWING TERRY L 691858 KOWING TERRY L 600160 109 LOGAN AVE S 109 LOGAN AVE S RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 569600-0180-00 569600-0185-05 WINSTON ROBERT ANDREW+LISA 739999 WINSTON LISA J+ROBERT AN0RE179999 103 LOGAN AVE S 103 LOGAN AVE S RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 569600-0190-08 569600-0200-06 GAROT EUGENE 0 411594 WASHINGTON MUTUAL SVGS BK 601618 PO BOX 5001 C/O KOLL CORPORATE SERVICES KENT WA 98004 1191 2ND AVE STE 0950 SEATTLE WA 98101 569600-0210-04 569600-0215-09 WASHINGTON MUTUAL SVGS BK 601618 KING JERRY M+JANICE E 282389 C/O KOLL CORPORATE SERVICES 31620 176TH AVE SE 1191 2ND AVE STE 0950 AUBURN WA 98002 SEATTLE WA 98101 569600-0220-02 569600-0225-07 KING JERRY M+JANICE E 282396 MC LUEN AARON+LYNOA 859999 31620 176TH AVE SE 117 BURNETT FL S AUBURN WA 98002 RENTON WA 98055 569600-0235-05 -< s. 5b96(�0-0245-03;�'." ',; :• .;." ai :a•„ r{I(y SIGETTE MARY LOU 869999 BERT ROBERTS.•J. 999999 116 LOGAN AVE SOUTH 280 HARDIE AyE,:,SH RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA `Y ,' .!11/8055 569600-0250-05 569600-0255-00 BIRD G ROBERT C0381 GEBENINI VIVIAN J 930314 8722 S 121ST 106 LOGAN AVE S SEATTLE WA 98178 RENTON WA 98055 569600-0260-03 569600-0261-02 STAUFF RICHARD J 102009 STAUFF RICHARD J+BETTY J 919999 13813 139TH AVE SE 13813 139TH AVE SE 7229/0-0020-00 722930-0595-- FATTOKE RCBERT L 809999 FRASIER CH ;TINE 512620 109 S TILLICUM ST SEVERYNS WILLIAM RENTON WA 98055 PO BOX 836 RENTON WA 98057 ` 722930-0600-08 722930-0600-81 HEITMAN RUBY V R1079 HEITMAN RUBY V 349800 ' 50 LOGAN AVE S 50 LOGAN AVE S RENTUN WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 722930-0610-06 722950-0030-03 CITY OF RENTON 4N9700 GRAY MARY 609999 CITY HALL 200 MILL AVE S 25711 SE 208TH ST RENTON WA 98055 MAPLE VALLEY WA 98038 722950-0061-05 722950-0063-03 HSUE KWAI+LEE-YUH 079999 WILSON PETER H 882628 7515 SE 71ST 24333 35TH AVE S MERCER ISLAND WA 98040 KENT WA 98032 722950-0064-02 722950-0072-02 HSUE KWAI-SHUNG 1N0027 BAREI MRS UMBERTO 110 RAINIER AVE S 322 S 15TH ST RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 784180-0005-06 784180-0015-04 PUTMAN MARY ANN 715027 FAKHARZADEH M HADI 660758 4422 42ND AVE SW PO BOX 78404 SEATTLE WA 98116 SEATTLE WA 98178 784180-0025-02 784180-0035-00 PERFECTION TIRE PARTNERSHIP4310�1 RENTON RENAISSANCE APTS 949700 205 LOGAN S LIMITED LIABILITY CO RENTON WA 98055 3316 FUHRMAN AVE E SEATTLE WA 98102 784180-0045-08 784180-0065-03 RENTON LUTHERAN CHURCH 687777 SEARING TIMOTHY J 500864 200 WHITWORTH AVE S 01143-001 KEESLAR CHRLES R RENTON WA 98055 211 MORRIS AVE S RENTON WA 98055 784180-0075-01 784180-0080-04 RENTON LUTHERAN CHURCH 687777 RENTON LUTHERAN CHURCH 687777 200 WHITWORTH AVE S 01143-001 200 WHITWORTH AVE S 01143-001 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 784180-0085-09 784180-0085-90 WORLD ASSOCIATION FOR CHILD419999 WORLD ASSOCIATION FOR CHIL0409800 PO BOX 88948 PO BOX 88948 SEATTLE WA 98138 SEATTLE WA 98138 784180-0090-02 784180-0135-09 BLACKWELL BEVERLY ANN 699999 FIRST CH OF CHRIST SCIENT 687777 215 WHITWORTH AVE S 220 WHITWORTH AVE S 01134-001 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 S NOTICE OF APPLICATION A Master Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the ry Public Approvals. PROJECT NUMBERINAME: LUA-99.120,CU-H I RENTON HIGH SCHOOL MODERNIZATION PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Proposal for modernization of the existing Renton High School. The east wing would be removed for construction of a new 16,500 square foot Auditorium/Perlorming Arts Center. There would be extensive interior modemizatlon of the principal school budding,Budding'A".The project would Include systems upgrades and minor alterations to the Gymnasium/Food Service Commons budding,Budding B.The existing Vocational budding al the north end of the site may be used for Interim classrooms during construction,but would be utilized for central warehouse/food storage after completion of the project. The proposal would revise existing access and parking areas. A new student and event parking area(203 parking spaces)would be developed in the east portion of the site.A new bus access and related loading area would also be constructed in this area of the site.A small visitor parking/drop off area would be added adjacent to the main school and Audilorkan/Perfomiing Ms Center.The existing road between the school and playhelds would be utilized for separate parking areas at the north and south ends,eliminating through traffic. The Renton School District is assuming lead agency status and will be conducting the Environmental Review(SEPA)on the subject application. PROJECT LOCATION: 400 South Second Street PUBLIC APPROVALS: Conditional Use(CU)Permit—Hearing Examiner Comments on the above application must be submitted In writing to Mr.Peter Rosen,Project Manager,Development Services Division,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 96055.by 5:00 PM on September 24,1999. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mad,contact Mr. Rosen at(425)430-7219.Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. This matter is scheduled for a public hearing on October 19,1999 at 9:00 AM,Council Chambers,Seventh Floor, Renton City Hall,1055 South Grady Way.Renton. If you are interested in attending the hearing,please contact the Development Services Division,(425)430-7282,to ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled. If comments cannot be submitted in writing by the dale indicated above,you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments on the proposal before the Hearing Examiner. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record end receive additional information by mail,contact Mr.Rosen at(425)430-7219. IPLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION ' DATE OF APPLICATION: August 20.1999 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: September 2,1999 DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: September 2,1999 r 1c 41,'1,„;16F'''1 V.1 II\ ---i-ii.Cfit.14 kl r‘i.''tk.,';';..0 `ems x ^x�l 6 I i ; 4 1-.VN ! V tio a0V101> . CERTIFICATION I, \TEM CO.,( ;; j i --, hereby certify that copies of the above document were posted by me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on :S7f1DAWIC .: j iei • Signed: 1� �.,yC,_,� ATTEST: Subcribed and sworn before me, a Nortary Public, in o£ r e State of Washington residing in , on the 1y r/1. day of (YYi'I '��/ *Ze--1-1--,-,__Iii,-6f_ MARILYN 4t1,I�PCHEFF NOTAR`r' PUBLIC STATE OF WASHINGTON MARILYN KAMCHEFF COMMISSION EXPIRES MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES:6-29-03 ,!L N.r- 4, 2003 e NOTICE OF APPLICATION A Master Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NUMBER/NAME: LUA-99-120,CU-H/RENTON HIGH SCHOOL MODERNIZATION PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Proposal for modernization of the existing Renton High School. The east wing would be removed for construction of a new 16,500 square foot Auditorium/Performing Arts Center. There would be extensive interior modernization of the principal school building,Building"A". The project would include systems upgrades and minor alterations to the Gymnasium/Food Service Commons building,Building"B". The existing Vocational building at the north end of the site may be used for interim classrooms during construction, but would be utilized for central warehouse/food storage after completion of the project. The proposal would revise existing access and parking areas. A new student and event parking area (203 parking spaces)would be developed in the east portion of the site. A new bus access and related loading area would also be constructed in this area of the site. A small visitor parking/drop off area would be added adjacent to the main school and Auditorium/Performing Arts Center. The existing road between the school and playfields would be utilized for separate parking areas at the north and south ends,eliminating through traffic. The Renton School District is assuming lead agency status and will be conducting the Environmental Review(SEPA)on the subject application. . PROJECT LOCATION: 400 South Second Street PUBLIC APPROVALS: Conditional Use(CU)Permit—Hearing Examiner Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Mr. Peter Rosen, Project Manager, Development Services Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055, by 5:00 PM on September 24, 1999. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail,contact Mr. Rosen at(425)430-7219. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. I c� �'1 This matter is scheduled for a public hearing on October 19, 1999 at 9:00 AM, Council Chambers, Seventh Floor, Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton. If you are interested in attending the hearing, please contact the Development Services Division, (425) 430-7282, to ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled. If comments cannot be submitted in writing by the date indicated above,you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments on the proposal before the Hearing Examiner. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional information by mail,contact Mr.Rosen at(425)430-7219. PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION DATE OF APPLICATION:. August 20, 1999 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: September 2,1999 DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: September 2,1999 Win. [e k :,1 r� 1��. ^i1$4•. •• ' �^.; ��! �ieIS4.4I aMtn%i '7 1 4,M1 "X \::,...,_ -,-W ... ,'- , 41; Ott ;l:' .7 i''','il,,1,1;r.,.eN' " v+_-- • r i II� , r14 TUT :'r � �. ' 1 �• - �74 , .ri , , � ,� t1 g ' ' .*ili ; ? N,s� 11!-,ate& erg Zj'W 11111VNIe 44 _ : k, / / l;,•'7•[•1'rj-;t:g.,-4,:,_, ,_r,.,,, :, . •.1 _.ci L,.r:,, , . i. . { i J A + ;1 i t•>I au 4, ,sue h' _*.:. : , ..:.•►- e n 4,41:„_ ,.I ! ,),�-'a :2 `ice;+w..k., �i l �. I ' ��" appnotice %�y r IA I1V"., , l CITY OF RENTON x' �, Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator September 2, 1999 Mr. Guy Overman Northwest Architectural Company 2201 Sixth Avenue, Suite 1405 Seattle,Wa 98121-1832 SUBJECT: Renton High School Modernization Project No. LUA-99-120,CU-H Dear Mr. Overman: • The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. You will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, Washington, on October 19, 1999 at 9:00 AM to consider the proposed Conditional Use (CU) Permit. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present ' at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you one week before the hearing. Please contact me, at(425)430-7219, if you have any questions. Sincerely, Peter Rosen Project Manager cc: Rernton School District/Owners accentance 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 Thie n�nn.nnnfninc U1o%rnrvnlnil,, .i.I Oflo ...o,......o,,...o. CITY REf�1T' ,DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION" LAN USE PERMIT MASTER APPLICATION PROPERTY OWNERS) > ;,: :PROJECT IN�'ORMATEON;> . Note If;there is,,more than one legal owner please attach;an add flonel: notarizedMastor%Application for:each owner PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: NAME: Renton School District Renton High School Modernization Capital Projects Office PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION: ADDRESS: 1220 North Fourth Street 400 South Second Street Renton, WA 98055 • CITY: Renton, WA ZIP: 98055 KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): ' 000720-0060-06 TELEPHONE NUMBER: EXISTING LAND USE(S): 425-204-4475 School .... .................................................................................................................................... ...................................................................................................................................... ARP,LlCA'NT.(if:other than 'owner) PROPOSED LAND USES: NAME: SAME Same COMPANY (if applicable): EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: Center - Downtown ADDRESS: PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): Same CITY: ZIP: EXISTING ZONING: CD (P) TELEPHONE NUMBER: _,r PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): N \�v CONTACT PERSON Same ••nn � `pN CLS SITE AREA (SQ. FT. OR ACR 'G0O� NAME: Guy J. Overman 25.84 Acres wl PROJECT VALUE: 6°'/ V COMPANY (if applicable): Northwest Architectural Co. $ 27,300,000 ADDRESS: IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? 2201 Sixth Avenue Suite 1405 No CITY: Seattle, WA ZIP: 98121 -1832 IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA? TELEPHONE NUMBER: 206-441-4522 No 0 CHI.CAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 1800 COLUMBIA CENTER, 701 5TH AVE, SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104 Order No.: 537484 Unit: u-io Proper/ Address:WASHINGTON Your No.: RENTON HIGH SCHOOL RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 403 1220 NORTH 4TH STREET RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 Attn: KATHY 1/1 Enclosed are your materials for the above transaction. If you have any questions regarding these materials, please contact us. Thank you for this opportunity to serve you. UNIT 10 - YOUR COMPLETE BUILDER/DEVELOPER SERVICE CENTER. WE HAVE EXPANDED TO SERVE ALL YOUR TITLE INSURANCE NEEDS RELATED TO LAND ACQUISITION, DEVELOPMENT FINANCING AND PROPERTY SUBDIVISION. MIKE HARRIS TITLE OFFICER (206) 628-5623 (E-MAIL: HARRISMI@CTT.COM) KEITH EISENBREY TITLE OFFICER (206) 628-8377 (E-MAIL: EISENBREYK@CTT.COM) STEVE KINSELLA CONDO COORDINATOR (206) 628-5614 (E-MAIL: KINSELLAS@CTT.COM) CHRIS JOHANSON SENIOR TITLE EXAMINER BOB BLOEDEL SENIOR TITLE EXAMINER FAX NUMBER: (206) 628-9738 ** EXCISE TAX CHANGES ** ** EXCISE TAX CHANGES ** ** EXCISE TAX CHANGES ** City of Tukwila' s. excise tax rate is increasing to 1 .78% for documents dated December 1, 1998 or later. The old rate of 1 .53% will continue to apply to documents dated prior to December 1, 1998 . CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY TITLET/10.17.91/SC AGO IITLE INSURANCE COMPJ-_ .Y .....J COLUMBIA CENTER, 701 5TH AVE SEATTLE, WA 98104 Order No.: 537484 SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE Certificate for Filing Proposed Short Plat In the matter of the short plat submitted for your approval,this Company has examined the records of the County Auditor and County Clerk of KING County,Washington, and the records of the Clerk of the United States Courts holding terms in said County,and from such examination hereby certifies that the title to the following described land situate in said KING County,to-wit: SEE SCHEDULE A(NEXT PAGE) VESTED IN: SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. SEVEN, AS TO PARCELS A AND B; AND RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 403, AS TO THE REMAINDER. EXCEPTIONS: SEE SCHEDULE B ATTACHED CHARGE: $500.00 TAX: $ 43 .00 Records examined to February 22, 1999 at 8:00 A.M. CHICAGO I I ILE INSURANCE COMPANY _72z By MIKE HARRIS/KEITH EISENBREY Title Officer (206) 628-5623 SHPLATA/12.5A0/EK .:] kGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPi r' Order No.: 537484 SHORT PLAT CER 1'1MCATE SCHEDULE A (Continued) LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL A: THAT PORTION OF THE H. H. TOBIN DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 37 IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE STONE MONUMENT AT THE INTERSECTION OF SECOND AVE. AND BURNETT ST. IN THE TOWN OF RENTON; THENCE WEST IN EXTENSION OF SAID SECOND AVE. A DISTANCE OF 447.12 FEET; THENCE NORTH A DISTANCE OF 30.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH ALONG THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF MOTOR LINE ADDITION TO THE TOWN OF RENTON A DISTANCE OF 576.52 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTHERLY MARGIN OF THAT CERTAIN TRACT HERETOFORE DEEDED BY C. R. ADSIT; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHERLY MARGIN OF SAID TRACT A DISTANCE OF 375.3 FEET; THENCE SOUTH A DISTANCE OF 584.5 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE WESTERLY EXTENSION OF THE NORTHERLY MARGIN OF SECOND AVENUE; THENCE EAST A DISTANCE OF 375.3 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL B: THAT PORTION OF THE H. H. TOBIN DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 37 IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT WHICH IS 2165 FEET NORTH OF AND 645 FEET WEST OF THE CORNER COMMON TO SECTIONS 17, 18, 19, AND 20, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SAID POINT BEING 260.07 FEET EAST OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SMITHERS FOURTH ADDITION TO THE TOWN OF RENTON; THENCE NORTH 00°03'20" EAST A DISTANCE OF 567.68 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 89°56'20" WEST A DISTANCE OF 375 .3 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°03'20" EAST A DISTANCE OF 583 .97 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88°59'20" WEST A DISTANCE OF 366 .0 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°03'20" WEST A DISTANCE OF 600.08 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°18' 13" EAST A DISTANCE OF 741.3 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL C: THAT PORTION OF THE H. H. TOBIN DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 37 IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF A 2 ACRE TRACT CONVEYED TO DAVID C. MITCHELL SEE NEXT PAGE CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY ( :AGO TITLE INSURANCE COMP,_ Policy No.: 537484 EXTENDED MORTGAGEE LEASEHOLD POLICY SCHEDULE A (Continued) LEGAL DESCRIPTION BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 189971, SAID-POINT BEING 1077.12 FEET WEST AND 1136.52 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BLOCK 25 OF THE TOWN OF RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 1 OF PLATS, PAGE 135, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID MITCHELL TRACT A DISTANCE OF 140.4 FEET TO THE PRODUCTION SOUTHERLY OF THE EAST LINE OF SHATTUCK STREET NORTH AS DEEDED TO THE CITY OF RENTON UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 941263, AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE WEST A DISTANCE OF 50 FEET; THENCE NORTH A DISTANCE OF 275 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF TOBIN AVENUE; THENCE EAST A DISTANCE OF 50 FEET TO SAID PRODUCED EAST LINE OF SHATTUCK STREET NORTH; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID PRODUCED LINE A DISTANCE OF 275 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL D: THAT PORTION OF THE H. H. TOBIN DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 37 IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A STONE MONUMENT ON THE SOUTHERLY MARGIN OF THE CITY OF SEATTLE PIPE LINE RIGHT OF WAY A DISTANCE OF 174 .62 FEET EASTERLY FROM THE CITY OF RENTON CITY LIMITS, AS IT EXISTED ON JULY 28, 1943, ON THE BLACK RIVER; THENCE NORTHERLY AT A RIGHT ANGLE TO SAID SOUTHERLY MARGIN A DISTANCE OF 144 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY MARGIN OF SECOND AVENUE; THENCE SOUTH 89°04'45" EAST A DISTANCE OF 3 .06 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 00°36' 00" EAST A DISTANCE OF 410.41 FEET; THENCE NORTH 17°54'48" EAST A DISTANCE OF 154 .51 FEET TO A POINT SOUTH 88°13' 00" EAST A DISTANCE OF 23 .64 FEET FROM THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF VICTORIA KELLY ADDITION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 23 OF PLATS, PAGE 24, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE NORTH 88°13'00" EAST ALONG THE PRODUCED SOUTHERLY MARGIN OF SAID ADDITION A DISTANCE OF 260.07 FEET TO A POINT ON THE CENTERLINE OF SHATTUCK STREET PRODUCED NORTHERLY A DISTANCE OF 637.60 FEET, MORE OR LESS, FROM ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE CENTERLINE OF SECOND AVENUE PRODUCED WESTERLY; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 88°13' 00" EAST A DISTANCE OF 154.57 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°46' 55" WEST A DISTANCE OF 602 . 98 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY MARGIN OF SECOND AVENUE; THENCE NORTH 89°56' 00" WEST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY MARGIN A DISTANCE OF 118.61 FEET TO. A POINT OF CURVE; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 416.06 FEET AN ARC DISTANCE OF 135 . 73 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVE; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 684 .70 FEET AN ARC DISTANCE OF 210 .10 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY ( AGO 1TILE INSURANCE COMP, .Y Policy No.: 537484 EXTENDED MORTGAGEE LEASEHOLD POLICY SCHEDULE A (Continued) LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL E: THAT PORTION OF THE H. H. TOBIN DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 37 IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A STONE MONUMENT ON THE SOUTHERLY MARGIN OF THE CITY OF SEATTLE PIPE LINE RIGHT OF WAY A DISTANCE OF 174.62 FEET EASTERLY FROM THE CITY OF RENTON CITY LIMITS, AS IT EXISTED ON JULY 28, 1943, ON THE BLACK RIVER; THENCE NORTHERLY AT A RIGHT ANGLE TO SAID SOUTHERLY MARGIN A DISTANCE OF 144 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY MARGIN OF SECOND AVENUE AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 89°04'45" WEST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY MARGIN A DISTANCE OF 36.94 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°36' 00" EAST A DISTANCE OF 559.46 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY MARGIN OF VICTORIA AVENUE, 62 .36 FEET WESTERLY FROM THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF VICTORIA A. KELLY ADDITION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 23 OF PLATS, PAGE 24, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE SOUTH 88°13' 00" WEST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY MARGIN AND SAID MARGIN PRODUCED A DISTANCE OF 86 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 17°54'48" WEST A DISTANCE OF 154.51 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°36' 00" WEST A DISTANCE OF 410.41 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY MARGIN OF SECOND AVENUE; THENCE NORTH 89°04'45" WEST A DISTANCE OF 3 .06 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL F: THAT PORTION OF THE H. H. TOBIN DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 37 IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF A 2 ACRE TRACT CONVEYED TO DAVID C. MITCHELL BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 189971, SAID POINT BEING 1077.12 FEET WEST AND 1136.52 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BLOCK 25 OF THE TOWN OF RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 1 OF PLATS, PAGE 135, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID MITCHELL TRACT A DISTANCE OF 144.4 FEET; THENCE NORTH A DISTANCE OF 275 FEET; THENCE EAST A DISTANCE OF 44 .4 FEET; THENCE SOUTH A DISTANCE OF 122 .5 FEET; THENCE EAST A DISTANCE OF 165.2 FEET; THENCE SOUTH A DISTANCE OF 152 . 5 FEET; THENCE WEST A DISTANCE OF 65 .2 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF THEREOF, IF ANY, LYING WITHIN THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY ( :AGO TITLE INSURANCE COMP. Y Policy No.: 537484 EXTENDED MORTGAGEE LEASEHOLD POLICY SCHEDUT.R A (Continued) LEGAL DESCRIPTION DEED FROM THE RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 403 TO GEORGE FABRE AND PAULINE FABRE, HUSBAND AND WIFE, UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 4596645, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THAT PORTION OF THE H. H. TOBIN DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 37 IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A MONUMENT AT THE INTERSECTION OF LOGAN STREET AND TOBIN AVENUE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, (SAID MONUMENT BEING ON THE CENTERLINE OF TOBIN AVENUE) ; THENCE WEST ON SAID CENTERLINE OF TOBIN AVENUE A DISTANCE OF 700 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 30 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF TOBIN AVENUE; THENCE WEST A DISTANCE OF 60 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 01°47' 00" WEST A DISTANCE OF 122 .5 FEET; THENCE WEST A DISTANCE OF 40 FEET; THENCE NORTH PARALLEL TO THE EAST LINE THEREOF A DISTANCE OF 122.5 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF TOBIN AVENUE; THENCE EAST ON THE SOUTH LINE OF TOBIN AVENUE A DISTANCE OF 40 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL G: THAT PORTION OF THE H. H. TOBIN DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 37 IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS : BEGINNING AT A POINT 65.2 FEET EAST OF THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF A 2 ACRE TRACT CONVEYED TO DAVID C. MITCHELL BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 189971, SAID SOUTHEAST CORNER BEING 1077.12 FEET WEST AND 1136 .52 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BLOCK 25 OF THE TOWN OF RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 1 OF PLATS, PAGE 135, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE NORTH A DISTANCE OF 155 FEET; THENCE EAST A DISTANCE OF 80 FEET; THENCE SOUTH A DISTANCE OF 155 FEET; THENCE WEST A DISTANCE OF 80 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL H: THAT PORTION OF THE H. H. TOBIN DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 37 IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT 414 .6 FEET EAST OF THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF A 2 ACRE TRACT CONVEYED TO DAVID C. MITCHELL BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 189971, SAID SOUTHEAST CORNER BEING 1077.12 FEET WEST AND 1136 .52 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BLOCK 25 OF THE TOWN OF RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY C AGO TITLE INSURANCE COMP.,. Policy No.: 537484 EXTENDED MORTGAGEE LEASEHOLD POLICY SCHEDULE A (Continued) LEGAL DESCRIPTION THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 1 OF PLATS, PAGE 135, INKING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE NORTH 300 FEET; THENCE EAST A DISTANCE OF 145.20 FEET; THENCE SOUTH A DISTANCE OF 300 FEET AND PARALLEL TO THE FIRST LINE; THENCE WEST A DISTANCE OF 145.20 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THE EAST 60 FEET THEREOF; ALSO EXCEPT THE NORTH 25 FEET FOR STREET PURPOSES; ALSO EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF DESCRIBED IN DEED FROM THE RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 403 TO JOHN PLESE AND FRANCES PLESE, RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 4002996 AND RERECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 4006047, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THE WEST 4 FEET OF THE EAST 64 FEET OF A TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT 414 .6 FEET EAST OF THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF A 2 ACRE TRACT CONVEYED TO DAVID C. MITCHELL BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 189971, SAID SOUTHEAST CORNER BEING 1077.12 FEET WEST AND 1136.52 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BLOCK 25 OF THE TOWN OF RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 1 OF PLATS, PAGE 135, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE NORTH 300 FEET; THENCE EAST A DISTANCE OF 145.20 FEET; THENCE SOUTH A DISTANCE OF 300 FEET AND PARALLEL TO THE FIRST LINE; THENCE WEST A DISTANCE OF 145.20 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL I: THAT PORTION OF THE H. H. TOBIN DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 37 IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THE SOUTH 155 FEET OF A TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT 280 FEET EAST OF THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF A 2 ACRE TRACT CONVEYED TO DAVID C. MITCHELL BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 189971, SAID SOUTHEAST CORNER BEING 1077.12 FEET WEST AND 1136 .52 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BLOCK 25 OF THE TOWN OF RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 1 OF PLATS, PAGE 135, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE EAST A DISTANCE OF 134 .6 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED TO RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 403 BY DEED RECORDED DECEMBER 23, 1949, UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 3970324; THENCE NORTH ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT A DISTANCE OF 300 FEET; THENCE WEST A DISTANCE OF 134.6 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO A POINT NORTH OF THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH A DISTANCE OF 300 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY AGO TITLE INSURANCE COMP, Y Policy No.: 537484 EXTENDED MORTGAGEE LEASEHOLD POLICY SCHEDULE A (Continued) LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL J: THAT PORTION OF THE H. H. TOBIN DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 37 IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THE SOUTH 155 FEET OF THE EAST 60 FEET OF A TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS : BEGINNING AT A POINT 414.6 FEET EAST OF THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF A 2 ACRE TRACT CONVEYED TO DAVID C. MITCHELL BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 189971, SAID SOUTHEAST CORNER BEING 1077.12 FEET WEST AND 1136.52 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BLOCK 25 OF THE TOWN OF RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 1 OF PLATS, PAGE 135, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE NORTH A DISTANCE OF 300 FEET; THENCE EAST A DISTANCE OF 145.20 FEET; THENCE SOUTH A DISTANCE OF 300 FEET; THENCE WEST A DISTANCE OF 145.20 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL K: THAT PORTION OF THE H. H. TOBIN DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 37 IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS : BEGINNING AT A POINT 145 .2 FEET EAST OF THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF A 2 ACRE TRACT CONVEYED TO DAVID C. MITCHELL BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 189971, SAID SOUTHEAST CORNER BEING 1077.12 FEET WEST AND 1136 .52 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BLOCK 25 OF THE TOWN OF RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 1 OF PLATS, PAGE 135, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE NORTH A DISTANCE OF 155 FEET; THENCE EAST A DISTANCE OF 134.8 FEET; THENCE SOUTH A DISTANCE OF 155 FEET; THENCE WEST A DISTANCE OF 134.8 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; AND THAT PORTION OF THE H. H. TOBIN DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 37 IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS : BEGINNING AT A POINT 145.2 FEET EAST OF THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF A 2 ACRE TRACT CONVEYED TO DAVID C. MITCHELL BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 189971, SAID SOUTHEAST CORNER BEING 1077.12 FEET WEST AND 1136 .52 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BLOCK 25 OF THE TOWN OF RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 1 OF PLATS, PAGE 135, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE NORTH A DISTANCE OF 155 FEET; CHICAGO I I I LE INSURANCE COMPANY • �- C AGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPr.. . Policy No.: 537484 EXTENDED MORTGAGEE LEASEHOLD POLICY SCHEDULE A (Continued) LEGAL DESCRIPTION THENCE EAST A DISTANCE OF 44 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH A DISTANCE OF 145 FEET; THENCE EAST A DISTANCE OF 90. 8 FEET; THENCE SOUTH A DISTANCE OF 145 FEET; THENCE WEST A DISTANCE OF 90.8 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THE NORTH 25 FEET THENCE OF THE LAST DESCRIBED TRACT FOR STREET PURPOSES. PARCEL L: THAT PORTION OF THE H. H. TOBIN DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 37 IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT 145.2 FEET EAST OF THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF A 2 ACRE TRACT CONVEYED TO DAVID C. MITCHELL BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 189971, SAID SOUTHEAST CORNER BEING 1077.12 FEET WEST AND 1136.52 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BLOCK 25 OF THE TOWN OF RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 1 OF PLATS, PAGE 135, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE NORTH A DISTANCE OF 155 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING: THENCE EAST A DISTANCE OF 44 FEET; THENCE NORTH A DISTANCE OF 145 FEET; THENCE WEST A DISTANCE OF 44 FEET; THENCE SOUTH A DISTANCE OF 145 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THE NORTH 25 FEET THEREOF FOR STREET PURPOSES. PARCEL M: THAT PORTION OF THE H. H. TOBIN DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 37 IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT 1512.72 FEET WEST AND 1136. 52 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BLOCK 25 OF THE TOWN OF RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 1 OF PLATS, PAGE 135, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE WEST A DISTANCE OF 72 .6 FEET; THENCE NORTH A DISTANCE OF 275 FEET; THENCE EAST A DISTANCE OF 72.6 FEET; THENCE SOUTH A DISTANCE OF 275 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL N: THAT PORTION OF THE H. H. TOBIN DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 37 IN THE NORTHEAST CHICAGO 111 LE INSURANCE COMPANY 4. ' k- C N.G0 TITLE INSURANCE COMP.-. i' Policy No.: 537484 EXTENDED MORTGAGEE LEASEHOLD POLICY SCHEDULE A (Continued) LEGAL DESCRIPTION QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS : BEGINNING AT A POINT 670 FEET EAST OF THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF A 2 ACRE TRACT CONVEYED TO DAVID C. MITCHELL BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 189971, SAID SOUTHEAST CORNER BEING 1077 .12 FEET WEST AND 1136.52 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BLOCK 25 OF THE TOWN OF RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 1 OF PLATS, PAGE 135, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE NORTH A DISTANCE OF 75 FEET; THENCE WEST A DISTANCE OF 110 FEET; THENCE SOUTH A DISTANCE OF 75 FEET; THENCE EAST A DISTANCE OF 110 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; PARCEL 0: THAT PORTION OF THE H. H. TOBIN DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 37 IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS : BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF VICTORIA A. KELLY ADDITION TO THE CITY OF RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 23 OF PLATS, PAGE 24, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE EAST A DISTANCE OF 290.4 FEET; THENCE SOUTH A DISTANCE OF 100 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH A DISTANCE OF 175 FEET; THENCE EAST A DISTANCE OF 96 FEET; THENCE NORTH A DISTANCE OF 275 FEET; THENCE WEST A DISTANCE OF 16 FEET; THENCE SOUTH A DISTANCE OF 100 FEET; THENCE WEST A DISTANCE OF 80 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL P: THAT PORTION OF THE H. H. TOBIN DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 37 IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS : BEGINNING AT A POINT 217.80 FEET WEST OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF A 2 ACRE TRACT CONVEYED TO DAVID C. MITCHELL BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 189971; THENCE NORTH A DISTANCE OF 129. 00 FEET; THENCE WEST A DISTANCE OF 72.60 FEET; THENCE SOUTH A DISTANCE OF 129.00 FEET; THENCE EAST A DISTANCE OF 72.60 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING WEST OF A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND 5. 00 FEET CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY t 4 C'--"5,GO ITI'LE INSURANCE COMPi. / Policy No.: 537484 EXTENDED MORTGAGEE LEASEHOLD POLICY SCHEDULE A (Continued) LEGAL DESCRIPTION EASTERLY OF, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF LOT 16, BLOCK 1, VICTORIA A. KELLY ADDITION TO THE CITY OF RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 23, OF PLATS, PAGE 24, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, AND NORTHERLY OF THE EASTERLY PRODUCTION OF THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 16. PARCEL Q: LOTS 13, 14, AND 15, BLOCK 1, VICTORIA A. KELLY ADDITION TO THE CITY OF RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 23 OF PLATS, PAGE 24, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. PARCEL R: THAT PORTION OF THE H. H. TOBIN DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 37 IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF A 2 ACRE TRACT CONVEYED TO DAVID C. MITCHELL BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 189971; THENCE WEST ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THE OLD FULLER PLACE A DISTANCE OF 72.60 FEET; THENCE NORTH A DISTANCE OF 129.00 FEET; THENCE EAST A DISTANCE OF 72 .60 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID 2 ACRE TRACT; THENCE SOUTH A DISTANCE OF 129.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.. PARCEL S: LOT 16, BLOCK 1, VICTORIA A. KELLY ADDITION TO THE CITY OF RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 23 OF PLATS, PAGE 24, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; AND THE WESTERLY 5 FEET IN WIDTH OF THAT PORTION OF THE H. H. TOBIN DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 37 IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING EASTERLY OF SAID LOT 16, BLOCK 1, AND BETWEEN THE EASTERLY PRODUCTIONS OF THE NORTH AND SOUTH LINES OF SAID LOT. PARCEL T: THAT PORTION OF THE H. H. TOBIN DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 37 IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS : BEGINNING AT A POINT 280 FEET EAST OF THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF A 2 ACRE TRACT CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY C ---:AGO TITLE INSURANCE COMP)-_ I Policy No.: 537484 EXTENDED MORTGAGEE LEASEHOLD POLICY SCHEDULE A (Continued) LEGAL DESCRIPTION CONVEYED TO DAVID C. MITCHELL BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 189971, SAID SOUTHEAST CORNER BEING 1077.12 FEET WEST AND 1136 .52 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BLOCK 25 OF THE TOWN OF RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 1 OF PLATS, PAGE 135, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE EAST A DISTANCE OF 134.5 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF A TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED TO RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 403 BY DEED RECORDED DECEMBER 23, 1949, UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 3970324; THENCE NORTH ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT A DISTANCE OF 300 FEET; THENCE WEST A DISTANCE OF 134.5 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO A POINT NORTH OF THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH A DISTANCE OF 300 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THE NORTH 25 FEET THEREOF FOR STREET PURPOSES BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 245468; ALSO EXCEPT THE SOUTH 155 FEET THEREOF. PARCEL U: THAT PORTION OF THE H. H. TOBIN DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 37 IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT WHICH IS THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTERLINE OF SECOND AVENUE AND SHATTUCK STREET IN THE CITY OF RENTON; THENCE NORTH 00°35' 00" EAST A DISTANCE OF 637.60 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88°13' 00" WEST A DISTANCE OF 346.07 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 88°13' 00" WEST A DISTANCE OF 314.43 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 29°35' 15" EAST A DISTANCE OF 188.65 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 07°50' 15" EAST A DISTANCE OF 164 .31 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°24' 00" EAST A DISTANCE OF 195.49 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°36' 00" EAST A DISTANCE OF 318 . 96 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF, IF ANY, LYING WITHIN THE BED AND SHORES OF THE BLACK RIVER AS THEY WERE SITUATED WHEN SAID RIVER CEASED TO BE A NAVIGABLE STREAM. PARCEL V: THAT PORTION OF THE H. H. TOBIN DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 37 IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS : BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF A 2 ACRE TRACT CONVEYED TO DAVID C. MITCHELL CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY • C AGO TITLE INSURANCE COMP. I Policy No.: 537484 EXTENDED MORTGAGEE LEASEHOLD POLICY SCHEDULE A (Continued) LEGAL DESCRIPTION BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 189971, SAID SOUTHEAST CORNER BEING 1077.12 FEET WEST AND 1136 .52 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BLOCK 25 OF THE TOWN OF RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 1 OF PLATS, PAGE 135, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE EAST A DISTANCE OF 62.5 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH A DISTANCE OF 300 FEET; THENCE EAST A DISTANCE OF 80 FEET; THENCE SOUTH A DISTANCE OF 300 FEET; THENCE WEST A DISTANCE OF 80 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THE NORTH 25 FEET THEREOF FOR ROAD PURPOSES; ALSO EXCEPT THE SOUTH 155 FEET THEREOF. PARCEL W: THAT PORTION OF THE H. H. TOBIN DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 37 IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT 72.60 FEET WEST OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF A 2 ACRE TRACT CONVEYED TO DAVID C. MITCHELL BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 189971; THENCE WEST ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THE OLD FULLER PLACE A DISTANCE OF 72 .60 FEET; THENCE NORTH A DISTANCE OF 129.00 FEET; THENCE EAST A DISTANCE OF 72 .60 FEET; THENCE SOUTH A DISTANCE OF 129.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL X: THAT PORTION OF THE H. H. TOBIN DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 37 IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF A 2 ACRE TRACT CONVEYED TO DAVID C. MITCHELL BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 189971, SAID SOUTHEAST CORNER BEING 1077 .12 FEET WEST AND 1136 .52 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BLOCK 25 OF THE TOWN OF RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 1 OF PLATS, PAGE 135, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID MITCHELL TRACT A DISTANCE OF 194 .40 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH A DISTANCE OF 275 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF TOBIN AVENUE; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE A DISTANCE OF 4 FEET; THENCE SOUTH A DISTANCE OF 275 FEET; WEST A DISTANCE OF 4 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY k_ Cl AGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPA. / Policy No.: 537484 EXTENDED MORTGAGEE LEASEHOLD POLICY SCHEDULE A (Continued) LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL Y: THAT PORTION OF THE H. H. TOBIN DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 37 IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS : BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF TOBIN AVENUE, 20 FEET WEST OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF A 2 ACRE TRACT CONVEYED TO DAVID C. MITCHELL BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 189971; THENCE SOUTH A DISTANCE OF 122 .5 FEET; THENCE WEST PARALLEL WITH TH SOUTH LINE OF TOBIN AVENUE A DISTANCE OF 83.81 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF A TRACT OF LAND DEEDED TO GEORGE FABRE • AND PAULINE FABRE, HUSBAND AND WIFE, BY DEED RECORDED-UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 2104714; THENCE NORTH 01°47' 00" EAST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID TRACT A DISTANCE OF 122 .5 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF TOBIN AVENUE; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE A DISTANCE OF 80 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL Z: THAT PORTION OF THE H. H. TOBIN DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 37 IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS : BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF A 2 ACRE TRACT CONVEYED TO DAVID C. MITCHELL BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 189971; THENCE WEST ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THE OLD FULLER PLACE A DISTANCE OF 72.60 FEET; THENCE NORTH A DISTANCE OF 129 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH A DISTANCE OF 146 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF TOBIN STREET IN THE CITY OF RENTON; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE A DISTANCE OF 72.60 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID 2 ACRE TRACT; THENCE SOUTH A DISTANCE OF 146 FEET; THENCE WEST A DISTANCE OF 72.60 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL AA: THAT PORTION OF THE H. H. TOBIN DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 37 IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF TOBIN STREET, 20 FEET WEST OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF A 2 ACRE TRACT CONVEYED TO DAVID C. MITCHELL BY DEED RECORDED CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY w, • • C AGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPi l Policy No.: 537484 EXTENDED MORTGAGEE LEASEHOLD POLICY SCHEDULE A (Continued) LEGAL DESCRIPTION UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 189971, SAID NORTHEAST CORNER BEING 1077.12 FEET WEST AND 1411.52 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BLOCK 25 OF THE TOWN OF RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 1 OF PLATS, PAGE 135, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE SOUTH A DISTANCE OF 122 .5 FEET; THENCE EAST A DISTANCE OF 85 FEET; THENCE NORTH A DISTANCE OF 122 .5 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF TOBIN STREET; THENCE WEST, ALONG SAID STREET MARGIN, A DISTANCE OF 65 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL AB: THAT PORTION OF TRACT 7, SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL MAPS OF ,RENTON SHORE LANDS, AS SHOWN ON THE OFFICIAL MAPS THEREOF ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC LANDS AT OLYMPIA WASHINGTON, LYING NORTH OF THE WESTERLY PRODUCTION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF THAT PORTION OF THE H. H. TOBIN DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 37 IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTER LINES OF SECOND AVENUE AND SHATTUCK STREET IN THE CITY OF RENTON; THENCE NORTH 00°36' 00" EAST A DISTANCE OF 637.60 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88°13' 00" WEST A DISTANCE OF 346 . 07 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THIS DESCRIPTION; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 88°13' 00" WEST A DISTANCE OF 314 .43 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 29°35' 15" EAST A DISTANCE OF 188.65 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 07°50' 15" EAST A DISTANCE OF 164.31 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°24' 00" EAST A DISTANCE OF 195.49 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°36' 00" EAST A DISTANCE OF 318.96 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL AC: THAT PORTION OF THE H. H. TOBIN DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 37 IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF A TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED TO LUCINDA AND JOHN WILLIAMS BY JOSIE JANOSKI BY DEED DATED JANUARY 22, 1909, AND RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 594247; THENCE EAST A DISTANCE OF 80 FEET; THENCE SOUTH A DISTANCE OF 100 FEET; THENCE WEST A DISTANCE OF 80 FEET; THENCE NORTH A DISTANCE OF 100 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CHICAGO 11 LE INSURANCE COMPANY CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Order No.: 537484 SHORT PLAT CER I INCATE SCHEDULE B This certificate does not insure against loss or damage by reason of the following exceptions: GENERAL EXCEPTIONS: A. Defects,liens,encumbrances,adverse claims or other matters,if any,created,first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires for value of record the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. B. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. C. Encroachments, overlaps,boundary line disputes,and any other matters which would be disclosed by an accurate survey and inspection of the premises. D. Easements or claims of easements not shown by the public records. E. Any lien, or right to lien,for contributions to employee benefit funds,or for state workers'compensation,or for services,labor,or material heretofore or hereafter furnished,all as imposed by law,and not shown by the public records. F. Liens under the Workmen's Compensation Act not shown by the public records. G. Any service,installation, connection,maintenance or construction charges for sewer,water,electricity or garbage removal. H. General taxes not now payable;matters relating to special assessments and special levies,if any,preceding or in the same becoming a lien. I. Reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; Indian tribal codes or regulations,Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, including easements or equitable servitudes. J. Water rights,claims,or title to water. K. THIS REPORT IS ISSUED AND ACCEPTED UPON THE UNDERSTANDING THAT THE LIABILITY OF THE COMPANY SHALL NOT EXCEED ONE THOUSAND DOLLARS($1000.00). SHPLA7B/031634/soc CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY .:H GO ITILE INSURANCE COMPA. Order No.: 537484 SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B (Continued) EXCEPTIONS • A 1. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: CITY OF RENTON PURPOSE: TRUNK SEWER AREA AFFECTED: A PORTION OF PARCELS R, W, AND Z, AS DESCRIBED IN SAID INSTRUMENT RECORDED: JUNE 22, 1922 RECORDING NUMBER: 1628000 2. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: CITY OF RENTON PURPOSE: PUBLIC UTILITIES (INCLUDING WATER AND SEWER) AREA AFFECTED: A PORTION OF PARCELS A, H, I, AND J, AS DESCRIBED IN SAID INSTRUMENT RECORDED: FEBRUARY 1, 1971 RECORDING NUMBER: 7102010228 c 3 . EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: CITY OF RENTON PURPOSE: PUBLIC UTILITIES (INCLUDING WATER AND SEWER) AREA AFFECTED: A PORTION OF PARCELS C AND D AS DESCRIBED IN SAID INSTRUMENT RECORDED: JUNE 27, 1985 RECORDING NUMBER: 8506270560 D 4 . EXCEPTIONS AND RESERVATIONS CONTAINED IN DEED FROM THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, WHEREBY THE GRANTOR EXCEPTS AND RESERVES ALL OIL, GASES, COAL, ORES, MINERALS, FOSSILS, ETC. , AND THE RIGHT OF ENTRY FOR OPENING, DEVELOPING AND WORKING THE SAME AND PROVIDING THAT SUCH RIGHTS SHALL NOT BE EXERCISED UNTIL PROVISION HAS BEEN MADE FOR FULL PAYMENT OF ALL DAMAGES SUSTAINED BY REASON OF SUCH ENTRY; RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 5655162. RIGHT OF STATE OF WASHINGTON OR ITS SUCCESSORS, SUBJECT TO PAYMENT OF COMPENSATION THEREFORE, TO ACQUIRE RIGHTS OF WAY FOR PRIVATE RAILROADS, SKID ROADS, FLUMES, CANALS, WATER COURSES OR OTHER EASEMENTS FOR TRANSPORTING AND MOVING TIMBER, STONE, MINERALS AND OTHER PRODUCTS FROM CHICAGO 111LE INSURANCE COMPANY C] k.GO TITLE INSURANCE COMP,. Y Order No.: 537484 SHORT PLAT CER Tit-TCATE SCHEDULE B (Continued) EXCEPTIONS THIS AND OTHER PROPERTY, AS RESERVED IN DEED REFERRED TO ABOVE. AFFECTS: PARCEL AB. a 5 . ANY PROHIBITION OR LIMITATION OF USE, OCCUPANCY OR IMPROVEMENT OF THE LAND RESULTING FROM THE RIGHTS OF THE PUBLIC OR RIPARIAN OWNERS TO USE ANY PORTION WHICH IS NOW OR HAS BEEN FORMERLY COVERED BY WATER. a AFFECTS : PARCEL AB. • 6. PARAMOUNT RIGHTS AND EASEMENTS IN FAVOR OF THE UNITED STATES FOR COMMERCE, NAVIGATION, FISHERIES AND THE PRODUCTION OF POWER. J AFFECTS: PARCEL AB. • 7. THE PROPERTY HEREIN DESCRIBED IS CARRIED ON THE TAX ROLLS AS EXEMPT, HOWEVER IT WILL BECOME TAXABLE ON THE DATE OF THE EXECUTION OF A CONVEYANCE TO A TAXABLE ENTITY AND SUBJECT TO THE LIEN OF REAL PROPERTY TAXES FOR THE BALANCE OF THE YEAR FROM THAT DATE. TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 000720-0060-06 LEVY CODE: 2100 ASSESSED VALUE-LAND: $ NOT AVAILABLE ASSESSED VALUE-IMPROVEMENT: $ NOT AVAILABLE L AFFECTS: SAID PREMISES EXCEPT PARCELS Q AND S. rt 8. THE PROPERTY HEREIN DESCRIBED IS CARRIED ON THE TAX ROLLS AS EXEMPT, HOWEVER IT WILL BECOME TAXABLE ON THE DATE OF THE EXECUTION OF A CONVEYANCE TO A TAXABLE ENTITY AND SUBJECT TO THE LIEN OF REAL PROPERTY TAXES FOR THE BALANCE OF THE YEAR FROM THAT DATE. TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 380600-0065-02 LEVY CODE: 2100 ASSESSED VALUE-LAND: $ NOT AVAILABLE ASSESSED VALUE-IMPROVEMENT: $ NOT AVAILABLE AFFECTS: PARCELS Q AND S. SH PIAT133/12-12-90/EK CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY h,- ' t .:H GO TITLE INSURANCE COMPA Order No.: 537484 SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B (Continued) EXCEPTIONS • o 9. THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION IN THE DEEDS UNDER WHICH PARCEL U IS VESTED, RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBERS 4540447 AND 4540448, CONTAINS AN ERROR. THEY SHOW A CALL "THENCE NORTH 80°13' 00" WEST A DISTANCE OF 346.07 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING" . THIS CALL SHOULD READ "THENCE NORTH 88°13' 00" WEST A DISTANCE OF 346.07 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING" . p 10. THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION IN THE DEED UNDER WHICH PARCEL AA IS VESTED, RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 5095542, CONTAINS AN ERROR. THE CALL THEREIN WHICH READS "THENCE WEST ALONG SAID STREET MARGIN 20 FEET" IS UNNECESSARY AND GARBLES THE DESCRIPTION. 0 11. THE FOLLOWING MATTERS DISCLOSED BY SURVEY RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8702039007 : FENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF PARCEL A ENCROACHES WESTERLY OF SAID EAST LINE; AND GARAGE APPURTENANT TO PROPERTY EASTERLY OF PARCEL A ENCROACHES ONTO AN EASTERLY PORTION OF SAID PARCEL A. a 12 . THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION IN THIS COMMITMENT IS BASED ON INFORMATION PROVIDED WITH THE APPLICATION AND THE PUBLIC RECORDS AS DEFINED IN THE POLICY TO ISSUE. THE PARTIES TO THE FORTHCOMING TRANSACTION MUST NOTIFY THE TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY PRIOR TO CLOSING IF THE DESCRIPTION DOES NOT CONFORM TO THEIR EXPECTATIONS. s NOTE 1: THE FOLLOWING MAY BE USED AS AN ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON THE DOCUMENTS TO BE RECORDED TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF R.C.W. 65.04. SAID ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS NOT A SUBSTITUTE FOR A COMPLETE LEGAL DESCRIPTION WHICH MUST ALSO APPEAR IN THE BODY OF THE DOCUMENT: LOTS 13-16, BLOCK 1, VOLUME 23 PLATS PG 24, AND A PORTION OF TRACT 7, 2ND SUPPLEMENTAL MAPS OF RENTON SHORE LANDS; AND THAT PORTION OF THE H. H. TOBIN DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 37 IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 18-23-5. AS OF FEBRUARY 22, 1999, THE TAX ACCOUNTS FOR SAID PREMISES ARE 000720-0060-06 AND 380600-0065-02. END OF SCHEDULE B S H P IAT333/12-12.90/EK CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY . 0 CH_ICAGO '1'1'i'LL TRANCE COMPANY -- 180.0•COLIIMSIA CSNT%R, 701 5TH AVE, SHATRZS, WASHINOTCH 98104 IMPORTANT: This is not a Survey. It is furnished as a convenience to locate the land indicated hereon with reference to streets and other land. No liability is assumed by reason of reliance hereon. H. H. Tobin Donation Land Claim No. 37 Victoria A. Kelley Addition to the City of Renton 23/24 Second Supplemental Maps of Renton Shore Lands Southerly portion of the Northeast 1/i of Section 18-23-5 -I .,:.r..:.._......:.. I 1 poos A .r r• ���E I ' Idie•., ! •- • S TILLICUN' eIIl ST y(((m[ • N w • . 1S • •i . ' ..' < I r - i ll� r I Q i .:a >r a. I � � C$ S u I ; r„ I1 it .Iem's l3 1 I • p dI I . + � Qe' 1 +1`_y l . µre 9 ' lY.'.? ,.. : �r1 I - ,' , _ n � gel ae ,n — 57�HlI S. ..TQtI/.f:, ‘)' lT .. .^ it :..., , ',� D�"37 og7w I. ST �7 �•\oti I 1'V • ®I i _ H__ •nC ORIg AVE }} I ! $ `. '' a —_I r- -- ' - a z I • . i • I n . I tl..l 4` I t L' ��. 51!2 f,.f 3 . W ,O ,_ti �s. w SECOND 5- , t 2 4 `��..zyy S. SECO ND 5-. MAP SITE PLAN APPROVAL J v� ° h&cturdl PROJEC.: Renton High School Modernization #2-98092-4C CITY OFNTPLgNNING a� ,>s Renton School District RENTON a J DATE: October 7, 1999 SEP 0 6 1999 Bruce E.Blackmer,AIA .V 9. PROJECT NARATIVE REVISED RE �CE� Brookie,AIA ED Dale S RobertJ.Grossman,AIA Cohn R Jones,AIA The project consists of the modernization of the existing 320,800 s.f. Renton High School. Built and A.Fred King,AIA Steven J.McNutt AIA expanded in phases from 1931 through 1969, the facility is housed in several buildings on an existing R.G.Nelson,AIA campus adjacent to the Renton Central Business District. While originally one of the largest high Benson A.Nielsen,AIA schools in the state, the construction in the late 1960's of two new high schools in the district severely R c'hord A.Saloggolk,A!A reduced the population of Renton High School. It currently houses approximately 940 students. Gregory J.Stack,AIA The site is zoned Center Downtown with a"P"suffix for public use CD(P). The adjacent properties are Keith M.Comes.AIA Center Downtown CD ommercial anesenal-8 - . e ro ect when William B. W.Rosh,AIA ( )' Arterial C CA( ), d Ridti R8 Th ( ) P J Bruce B.Turner,PE modernized will continue its use as a secondary school. The proposed project will remove the existing east wing (the "Junior High" constructed in 1941) and replace it with a new Auditorium/Performing Arts Center. In the original 1931 tower building, the interior will be gutted and completely reconstructed, including the conversion of the original auditorium space to a multi-story Student Commons surrounded by the library,academic and administrative spaces. There will be extensive modernization of the 1950/1962-north wing as academic space. Demolition of the existing boiler building will provide room for the reconfiguration of the 1969 central area addition for academic space including infill of the lower level for vocational facilities. The project will include systems upgrades and minor alterations to the Gymnasium/Food Service Commons building. All buildings swill receive seismic upgrading to FEMA 178 standards. The existing Vocational building at the north portion of the site may be used for interim classrooms during construction, but will be excluded from normal academic use by the high school and utilized for central warehouse and food storage by the District at the completion of the project. The maximum proposed new building height • (54'-2")or penthouse(56')will be well under the allowable building height of 95'. The total proposed lot coverage at completion would be 15.37%. All fire hydrant on site or adjacent to the site,serving the site will be upgraded with storz fittings. Any revised hydrant locations on site will be provided with the required easements to the City. The 4,000 gpm fire flow required on site can be accommodated in this area. No work is anticipated at the existing playfields and north parking areas on the western portion of the relatively flat site. There will no significant grading of the site; consequently there should be minimal erosion during construction. There are no wetlands existing on the site. The Geotech report describes the site soils as loose gravely fill over loose alluvium. Drainage from impervious areas will be collected using catch basins and roof drains and discharged to the public storm mains on South Second and Tobin streets. The existing road between the school and playfields will be utilized for separate parking areas at the north and south ends with the elimination of through traffic. A new bus access from the east and a related loading area will be developed. New student and event parking will be developed at the east portion of the site. A small visitor parking and drop off area will be developed adjacent to the main school and Auditorium/Performing Arts Center entrances. Site lighting will comply with the local offsite glare limitations. The visitor drop off at the Performing Arts Center will consider using lighting compatible with design concept lighting proposed at the downtown civic center, one block away. Offices in As in the planning of all school replacements, modernizations,and upgrades,the Renton School District Seorrle,Spokare attempts toprovide a "contingency" for the projected student enrolment capacity, byplanning, and Coeur d'Aie P a Y designP � indicating, and providing underground communication and electrical connections, for as many as four 2201 Sixth Ave--e "future" portable classrooms on each school site. This responds to the visual and safety concerns by Sucre 1405 avoiding temporary overhead wiring, and provides an planned and anticipated response to the always Sao rz l-1 a32 nzr-or. last minute emergency of possible fluctuation of anticipated enrollment. Although it is not anticipated TEL 206-441-4522 FAX 206-441 917 EMAIL naclgnwarchco N;EBSITE www nwarchcc.cam SITE PLAN APPROVAL PROJECT NARATIVE/CONSTRUCTION MITIGATION DESCRIPTION October 7, 199 that these "Portable Classrooms" will ever be needed, a pre-reviewed, anticipated location could expedite the final approval process. They would be provided from the District's inventory of newer portable structures,approximately 26'x 35'x 13'high in size,and be used for instructional purposes. The design of the facility will maintain and enhance the historic exterior of the original school building, with the new Auditorium/Performing Arts Center designed to recycle elements of the demolished Junior High entry and generally be sympathetic to the design character of the adjacent original building. The current schematic design responds to the currently established Maximum Allowable Construction Cost of$26,086,223 plus an additional$1,217,212 of construction funds provided by the City of Renton for upgrade of the Auditorium to a Performing Arts Center. 2-98092/4/C/4Ca-SiteRev2Proj Sum-991005 DEVELOProVaNT FiANNINc�CITY OF RENTON OC T 0 e, 1999 RECEIVED Page 2 SITE PLAN APPROVAL _ , 1 thiktud PROJECT: Renton High School Modernization #2-98092-4Ca Renton School District omp..'J Ps DATE: August 20, 1999 PARKING MODIFICATION Bruce E.Blackmer,AIA Dale S.Brookie,AIA • Robert J Grossman,AIA The parking requirements for the Renton High School Modernization are based on Colin R.Jones,AIA several different event scenarios. As an operating secondary school with an A.Fred King,AIA Steven J.McNutt,AIA enrollment of 1400 students and a minimum of 102 staff personnel, the parking R.G.Nelson,AIA requirement would be based on 1 car/10 students and 1 car/1 staff or 242 cars. This does Benson A Nielsen,AIA q William M.Podobnik,AIA not consider the 12 visitor, 15 service, 12 bus, 120 student overflow, and 55 public Richard A Salogga,AIA parking spaces for a total of 456 provided on site. Gregory) stack,AIA Keith M.Comes,AIA William W.Rash,AIA An evening performance at the theatre that has 549 fixed seats would require lcar/4 Bruce B Turner,PE fixed seats or 138 parking spaces. If an evening or weekend event were to occur in the existing Gymnasium, the parking demand would be calculated based on 1 fixed seat for each 18" of available bleacher seating. This calculates to approximately a 2000 seat capacity. At a ratio of 1 car/4 fixed seats, this would be 500 parking spaces. Neither of these events would require a simultaneous demand for parking on the operating school. The design proposal is providing 456 parking spaces. It is the Design team's contention that the assembly use of the Gymnasium is primarily for school assemblies, physical education programs and other school functions such as a dance. Occasionally it is used for a Basketball game, a Volleyball, Wrestling or Gymnastics tournament that may demand the full capacity of the available parking on site. In a small urban High School Campus setting, adjacent to the downtown core and transportation center, it is not reasonable to provide the full lcar/4 fixed seats requirement. The campus has the capacity to provide an additional 40 to 50 temporary parking spaces in Bus loading areas and service courts (not in required fire lanes) that could supplement the striped parking, Our assumption is other patrons will arrive by school buses (the opposing team or tournament participants) , metro buses or park in neighborhood parking in the downtown core. The School District's proposed modernization has added approximately 150 striped parking stalls on site to accommodate these various activities, but it considers its primary use to be that of an operating secondary school and not a Sports facility. We believe this quantity of striped parking will appropriately accommodate it various uses. If you have further questions or considerations concerning this parking evaluation,please call Sinc ely, i y Offices m Seattle,Spokane, Guy J. rman, AIA DEVELOPMENT PLANNING and Coeur d'Alene Associate Principal Architect CITY OF RENTON 2201 Sixth Avenue Northwest Architectural Co. Suite 1405 2-98092/4/C/4Ca-ParkMod-990816 AUG 01999 Seattle,Washington • 98121-1832 RECEIVEDTEL 206-441-4522 FAX 206-441-7917 EMAIL nac@nwarchco.com WEBSITE www.nwarchco com LCITY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENTSERVICES DIVISION ENVI•RONMENTAL CHE• •CKLIST PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: " This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In'most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or"does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Renton High School Modernization. • 2. Name of Applicant: Renton School District: Capital Projects Office-Jack Connell 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Applicant: Agent(if applicable): Renton School District-Capital Projects Office Northwest Architectural Company 1220 North 4`h Street 2201 Sixth Avenue,Suite 1405 Renton,WA 98055 Seattle,WA 98121-1832 Attn: Jack Connell Attn: Guy Overman,Project Manager _ Tel. 425-204-4475 Fax 425-204-4476 Tel.206-441-4522 Fax 206-441-7917 4. Date checklist prepared: August 9, 1999 5. Agency requesting checklist: Renton School District 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Bid Award—Summer 2000 Completion-July 2002 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Topographic survey of existing conditions. Geotechnical investigations report. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. City of Renton-Building and related permits Department of Health Approval 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. The project consists of the modernization of the existing 320,800 square foot Renton High School which was built in phases from 1931 through 1969 and which housed as many as 3200 students in the 1970's. The project will remove the existing east wing (the "Junior High" constructed in 1941) and replace it with a new Auditorium/Performing Arts Center. The Boiler Building and smoke stack will be replaced with a new vocational education wing. The remaining buildings will be modernized to accommodate Environmental Checklist current curriculum needs and is designed for a student population of 1400. A portion of the existing Building C(see attached site plan)will be converted to use as the district warehouse. The current 25.84 acre site will not be enlarged. The existing play field areas will remain essentially untouched, with the site areas around the buildings being reconfigured to provide additional on-site parking and to separate bus, student, staff, and delivery vehicles. In the vicinity of the buildings, new landscaping and pedestrian areas will be developed. The existing tennis courts will be replaced. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. 400 South 2"d Street Renton,WA 98055 B. ENVIRONMETNAL ELEMENTS: 1. Earth: A. General description of the site (circle one): flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other Flat. B. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Two Percent(2%). C. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. The Geotechnical Report describes the site soils as loose fill over loose alluvium. D. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No. E. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. No significant grading is proposed for the project.Cuts will be made for pavement areas and approximately two(2)feet of fill will be placed for the PAC building. F. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Erosion is not anticipated due to the flatness of the site and minimal grading. 2 Environmental Checklist G. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Existing impervious coverage is approximately 11.5 acres. At completion of the project, coverage will be approximately 12.7 acres.The site coverage will be approximately 49%. H. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or'other impacts to the earth. A temporary erosion control plan using Best Management Practices(BMP) in accordance with the City of Renton will be implemented. Erosion control measures will include catch basin protection and stabilization at construction entrances. 2. Air: A. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Dust and air disturbance will be limited to site work and the immediate area around the addition. Site work is limited to modification of parking,landscaped,and pedestrian areas. B. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odors that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No. C. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Normal construction phases dust control measures for site work. 3. Water: A. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands): If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. None. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. N/A. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. N/A. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-yar floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. 3 Environmental Checklist 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. B. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: domestic sewage; industrial, containing any toxic chemicals; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) is(are) expected to serve. None. C. Water Runoff(including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Runoff from proposed pavements and roofs will be collected using catch basins and roof drains.Runoff will be routed to the existing storm drainage system and discharged to the public storm mains in South 2"d and South Tobin Streets. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No. D. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Detention will not be required for this project due to the negligible increase in impervious area and peak flows.The proposed project has a net decrease in parking areas and therefore is not required to provide water quality treatment. 4. Plants: A. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: X deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other. X evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other. X shrubs. X grass. pasture. crop or grain. wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other. water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other. other types of vegetation. B. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? 4 Environmental Checklist Some overgrown ornamental shrubs and a limited amount of grass and shrubbery areas at revised parking areas will be removed,and additional shrubs and grass installed where existing paving is removed at courtyard and building entry areas. C. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site: None known or observed. D. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Landscape islands will be added at courtyard area between buildings. 5. Animals: A. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site. Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: Songbirds Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: None Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: None B. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. C. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No. D. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None. 6. Energy and Natural Resources: A. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electric lighting and power,gas hot water and heating. B. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. 5 Environmental Checklist C. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Existing Buildings Aw and Ac will be upgraded to meet current energy code requirements. New and rehabilitated mechanical systems at all buildings will generally replace less efficient older systems. The new Performing Arts addition will meet current energy code requirements and will replace the existing energy inefficient "Junior High"wing. 7. Environmental Health: A. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No - any chemicals used in the science laboratories are the same as presently being used in the existing high school. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required: None. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: N/A. B. Noise: 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Traffic on adjacent city streets; aircraft from Renton Airport to north of site. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short term construction noise limited to daylight hours. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impact, if any: None. 8. Land and Shoreline Use: A. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Site is an existing High School. Property adjacent to school includes commercial in most locations, with some single and multifamily residential at the east and southwest sides. B. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe: No. 6 Environmental Checklist C. Describe any structures on the site: Existing one to three story High School buildings, constructed in phases between 1931 and 1969, • totaling 320,800 square feet. Construction is a mixture of masonry, steel frame, and wood frame construction. D. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Removal of 20,203 s.f. two story "Junior High" building. Removal of 2,893 s.f. boiler room/smoke stack. E. What is the current zoning classification of the site? CD(P). F. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Center-Downtown G. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A. H. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive"area? If so, specify: No. I. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Occupants in remodeled project initially will be approximately the same as at the existing school. Approximately 90-100 staff will work at the site. Approximately 1000 full-time equivalent students will occupy at the completion of the project,with a maximum design capacity of 1400 students. J. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. K. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N/A. L. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Existing area is essentially developed at this time. Exterior character of building will remain essentially unchanged. 9. Housing: A. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. N/A. B. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. 7 Environmental Checklist N/A. C. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N/A. 10. Aesthetics: A. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? Existing tower element at Building Aw is approximately 47'-9" tall. Height of existing Gymnasium Building(Building B)is approximately 50'-6". B. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. C. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None applicable. 11. Light and Glare: A. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce?What time of day would it mainly occur? Supplemental exterior lighting of parking and pedestrian areas will be installed for after dark use and safety. B. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. C. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. D. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: N/A. 12. Recreation: A. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Playfields on the site are available for community use. B. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: N/A. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation: 8 Environmental Checklist A. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe: No. B. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. Local cultural significance of the existing 1930 portion of the High School building. C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Building exterior will be renovated, and existing (non-original) windows replaced with new windows replicating appearance of original windows. 14. Transportation: A. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the exiting street system. Show on site plans, if any. The site is served by the existing Renton city street grid. Visitor parking, staff parking, and primary student parking will be accessed off of South 2"d Street. School bus access and egress shall be off of Logan Street. Supplemental student parking and most service access will be by separate entrances off of Tobin Street. B. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Nearest public transit stop is located at both east and west corners of the "Super Block" on Second Street,East and 'A block west of the site on Second Street. C. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? The total on-site parking will be approximately 396 spaces.Existing on-site parking is approximately 289 spaces. D. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private): No. E. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe: No. F. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicated when peak volumes would occur. Traffic generally occurs Monday through Friday from September to June with peak volumes occurring from 7:00-7:30 AM and 2:30 PM. the completed project will not generate a measurable change in the existing vehicle trips or traffic volumes. The existing school generates approximately 300 primary vehicle trips and 200 diverted link and by-pass trips per day. For periodic special evening events at the Performing Arts Center or the Gymnasium, vehicle trips are anticipated to be in the range of 100 to 300 maximum depending upon the event, occurring in the 6:00 PM to 10:30 PM time period. 9 • Environmental Checklist G. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Improved on-site parking and vehicular access. 15. Public Services: • A. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe: No. B. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impact on public services, if any: No. 16. Utilities: A. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other Electricity,natural gas,water,refuse service,telephone,sanitary sewer,stormsewer. B. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed: Electricity: Provided by Puget Sound Energy. Existing electrical service will be upgraded. Natural Gas: Provided by Puget Sound Energy. Natural gas service will be installed. Water: Provided by City of Renton. Existing water service will have on-site upgrades. Refuse Service: Provided by City of Renton. Telephone: Provided by US West. Existing telephone service will be upgraded. Sanitary Sewer : Provided by City of Renton. Existing sewer service will be used with on-site upgrades. Storm Sewer: Provided by City of Renton. C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. OWNER/AGENT SIGNATURE: Guy Overm , A-Northwest Architectural Company DATE SUBMITTED: August 9, 1999 10 COUGHLINPORTERLUNDEEN (DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CRY OF RENTON Fax Cover Sheet AItiJR *0 4999 RECEIVED To: City of Renton Date: August 11, 1999 Attn: Neil Watts Project: Renton High School Fax No: (425)430-7300 Project No: C990030-03 By: Nina Cousins No. of Pages Including Cover: 3 Original Will Not Follow. Neil, Per our recent telephone conversation,I am sending you this request for several items to be waived and/or accepted at the conceptual level for the Site Plan Approval submittal for the Renton High School Renovation project. The project is currently in the Design Development phase with building permit submittal scheduled for May 2000. The School District would like to start the Site Plan Approval process as soon as possible, in order to have time to incorporate any potential review comments prior to the Construction Document phase. Due to the currently early stage of project design,we request that the Drainage Report and Grading Plan portions of the Site Plan Approval submittal package be waived at this time. We also request that conceptual level drawings be accepted for the Drainage Control Plan and Utilities Plan portion of the submittal at this time. The project site is currently developed with the existing Renton High School. It is our understanding that site drainage design will need to meet the requirements of the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual. Based on these standards,and due to a negligible increase in impervious area, it appears that neither detention nor water quality treatment facilities will be required for the proposed project. The existing site topography is fairly flat. We do not anticipate significant grading to occur for the proposed project. Our final grading plan will consist of proposed pavement spot elevations and contours to meet and match existing conditions. Per the preapplication minutes and our conversations with Arneta Henninger, street improvements and a Traffic Study are not required for this project. 21 7 PINE STREET • SUITE 300 • SEATTLE, WA • 98101 • TEL: 206/343-0460 • FAX: 206/343-5691 COUGHLINPORTERLUNDEEN Please indicate the following items to be waived on the Waiver of Submittal Requirements for Land Use Applications form: • Drainage Report • Grading Plan • Traffic Study Please indicate the following items to be either waived or accepted at the conceptual level on the Waiver of Submittal Requirements for Land Use Applications form: • Drainage Control Plan • Utilities Plan We anticipate submitting the Site Plan Approval package on Monday August 16, 1999. Please fax a copy of the signed waiver form to Guy Overman of Northwest Architectural Company at(206)441- 7917 by Friday August 13. We appreciate your assistance. If you have questions or comments, please contact Nina Cousins at (206)343-0460 or Guy Overman at(206)441-4522. Thank you, Nina Cousins 21 7 PINE STREET • SUITE 300 • SEATTLE, WA • 98101 • TEL: 206/343-0460 • FAX: 206/343-5691 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS LAND USE PERMIT SUBMITTAL WAIVED MODIFIED COMMENTS: REQUIREMENTS: BY: BY: Calculations, Survey, ,x Drainage Control Plan 2 xs Drainage Report 2 • Elevations, Architectural3ANo4 �< Elevations, Grading 2 Existing Covenants (Recorded Copy)4 Existing Easements (Recorded Copy) 4 Flood Plain Map, if applicable 4 —= Floor Plans 3 ANo 4 Geotechnical Report z AND 3 Grading Plan, Conceptual 2 Grading Plan, Detailed 2 King County Assessor's Map Indicating Site Landscaping Plan, Conceptual4 Legal Description 4 List of Surrounding Property Owners 4 Mailing Labels for Property Owners 4 Map of Existing Site Conditions Master Application Form 4 Monument Cards (one per monument) , Parking, Lot Coverage & Landscaping Analysis 4 Plan Reductions (PMTs) 4 Postage 4 Public Works Approval Letter2 Title Report or Plat Certificate 4 Topography Map (5' contours)3 X Traffic Study 2 l(,'k L(,/, Tree Cutting/Vegetation Clearing Plan 4 xUtilities Plan, Generalized 2 /u Wetlands Delineation Map 4 Wetlands Planting Plan 4 Wetlands Study 4 This requirement may be waived by: ��" � /1 s�,j�B�inL/SC% ����1. Property Services Section PROJECT NAME: 2. Public Works Plan Review Section x� i�3 C6r1 3. Building Section DATE: 4. Development Planning Section h:\division.s\develop.ser\dev.plan.ing\waiver.xls INVOICE REQUEST CITY OF RENTON FINANCE DEPARTMENT Date: From Department: Authorization (Name & Signature): /0-Wt` '99 P5Pw Ce,YOM"- 2l4 Customer No.: Account Name: Dept. Contact: l/n02 Se"‘ 0/3 3 Lanai /V/�1 Check One Invoice Number: POD qq 3qq Ong l goice 1K Credit Memo ❑ Debit Memo ❑ PO# q4 invoice Title & Reference �N�(jo../:/ 7\J1 // Ate(. /y//�/ /\j/"//}I/ -1P1 Description: , mnz2r /r `10 ���� fro'" %y�M rr,c� � Gcv,b6erztk,,60--/-0 ohab&i_a__0(ia-(6taieztaen0),i4 (144e/ii ___/W>>608/2-14—, iff--1g, gwe see Account Distribut►on and Amounts Account Number Work Order/ Dollar Amount Function 'S' AZ,3qy,3/, PO. r:2lq 50 Zz 5Z6.o0 INVOICE TOTAL: Comments: Billing Address: gl,; ) „Wiz( Disfi'Y(J • ` IIGINAL VENDOR COPY L_ • DATE RENTON SCHOOL .1JISTRICT N0403 '. August 17., 1999 •x.. U • 94399 ,iit /I� s ,: . ._ '- - 5 fxs ; c a a ,mac.,.0 b. y ,'., • • PURCHASE ORDER DELIVERY REQUIRED I.ANNING 8 _.N/A --DESI%p getn0 TERMS Ci'N � 9 -.Net 30 Days TO: -1+"R" 4� 10 WS (VENDOR) CITY OF RENTON a r,000 °f FINANCE DEPARTMENT Gei V 10 ( _'200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 403 TEL: ( ) FOR BILLING ONLY NO INVOICES ACCEPTED SHIP TO: WITHOUT P.O.NO.REFERENCE 11 RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 403 Facilities & Operations SEND ORIGINAL INVOICE AND TWO COPIES TO: 1220 North 4th Street RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT Renton, WA 98055 BUSINESS OFFICE Phone: 425-204-4403 Fax: 425-204-4476 435 MAIN AVENUE SOUTH RENTON,WA 98055 F.O.B.POINT (VENDOR DELIVERY CHARGE 1 EE REVERSE 13 ❑ POINT 5) YES El (ENTER AMOUNT BELOW) J 14 QTY 15 UNIT 16 ITEM NO. 1, NOUN-ITEM DESCRIPTION 18**✓ 19 UNIT PRICE 20 TOTAL PRICE Miscellaneous services including plan review and permit fees far Renton High ; �= School $10 NOT _TO 0,000.00 x�1 � �. � � � x , . .- .. .-_ .. .. _ .... .. _.�.� :..�..�:�� ;. �,�..,. .�..�• -- , ,,�..��.. EXCEED •-: , -a „4 , - . rxr <y,-;• - ..s-sae a -. . ... • .. - � N: a s, ,... .e a,.�,:. w k,.� .�r. �... ♦::=.�„s,-�- __ .. ,> .. F r,. t._r. .„,„ ^are{ .Yr.., ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Ark, ,^.. - - -, - ,is 1 M -tic a}t ,i ,,, $"ggti •4 - .. . 21 22 DEL.CHARGE PRICE SOURCE(CHECK ONE) r NOT TO EXCEED (NTE)AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO 10%OR SUB TOTAL 10.0,000.()() QUOTATION NOT TO EXCEED ( $50.00,WHICHEVER IS GREATER;SUBJECT TO ANY EDU- J SALES TAX BID DATE I X I (N T E) \ CATIONAL DISCOUNTS. GRAND TOTAL $Lao;non_on * ISSUED BY PURCHASING DEPT.ONLY • PURCHASING DEPARTMENT • • :• -f4OL DIST.N403 235-AIRPORT WAY **FORM OSHA 20 MSDS REQUIRED RENTON,W• :8055(206)204 50 23 REQUISITION NO. 4 " • BUDGET YEAR(IF OTHER THAN CURRENT) .. --.,. •, v ' - FUND CODE 09-00-22-722--1-28 . e LYNNACUN ` - • - . . - DATE • MATERIALS•MANAGER **************************************************************** City of Renton WA Receipt **************************************************************** Receipt Number: R9905080 Amount : 500 . 00 10/11/99 11: 06 Payment Method: BILL Notation: RSD #94399 Init: LN Project #: LUA99-120 Type: LUA Land Use Actions Parcel No: 000720-0060 Site Address : 202 S 2ND ST Total Fees: 2 , 538 .94 This Payment 500 . 00 Total ALL Pmts: 2, 538 .94 Balance: . 00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 000 . 345 . 81 . 00 . 0019 Variance Fees 500 . 00 AIIIIGINAL VENDOR COPY DATE . RENTON SCHOO LISTRICT N0403 August 17, 1999 * :0 'NO. ' ' - _ :. 94399 PURCHASE ORDER 5 DELIVERY REQUIRED P�0NING 8 N/A - PME $ TERMS Net 30 Days To: ,o� NO" 99 (VENDOR) CITY OF RENTON C or000,0� FINANCE DEPARTMENT F���E�V�� s Z Il • 200 Mill Avenue South Wd ' Renton, WA 98055 003 TEL: ( ) FOR BILLING ONLY NO INVOICES ACCEPTED SHIP TO: WITHOUT P.O.NO.REFERENCE RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 403 Facilities & Operations SEND ORIGINAL INVOICE AND TWO ► COPIES TO: 1220 North 4th Street RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT Renton, WA 98055 BUSINESS OFFICE Phone: 425-204-4403 Fax: 425-204-4476 435 MAIN AVENUE SOUTH F.O.B.POINT (VENDOR DELIVERY CHARGE RENTON,WA 98055 �2 PEE REVERSE 3 POINT 5) YES ❑ NO (ENTER AMOUNT BELOW) 14 0TY 15 UNIT 16 ITEM NO. 17 NOUN-ITEM DESCRIPTION 18**✓ 19 UNIT PRICE 20 TOTAL PRICE Miscellaneous services including plan review and permit fees for Renton High School NOT TO $100,000.00 r > t EXCEED , s.� stAi: a,..af,,`.. a ,. �4 - ;..a,,,,_ _ rasa �„ "S e`ci arki= a .- y9. '". ma's ay' q's 1 - ; 574R„ h' ems. 'ES, X x'}-0 Y - cif .0 .Bi3 n 21 22 DEL.CHARGE PRICE SOURCE(CHECK ONE) NOT TO EXCEED (NTE)AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO 10%OR ` SUB TOTAL QUOTATION NOT TO EXCEED $50.00,WHICHEVER IS GREATER;SUBJECT TO ANY EDU- 11 10U,000"00 BID DATE X (N T E) CATIONAL DISCOUNTS. SALES TAX GRAND TOTAL $100,000.00 * ISSUED BY PURCHASING DEPT.ONLY PURCHASING DEPARTMENT **FORM OSHA-20 MSDS REQUIRED✓ COL DIST.#403 235-AIRPORT WAY RENTON,W• :8055(206)204 50 23 REQUISITION NO. BUDGET YEAR(IF OTHER THAN CURRENT) I • ----- FUND CODE 09-00-22-722-1-28 LYNNACUN DATE MATERIALS-MANAGER PSS 050 11/96 TERMS AND CONDITIONS ON REVERSE SIDE INVOICE REQUEST CITY OF RENTON FINANCE DEPARTMENT Date: From Department: Authorization (Name & Signature): 0 919 p/ pw ,9.vvices. Customer No.: Account Name: Dept. Contact: /inlY) (5 00( DiSS7/27Gt ./40.3MU/re/7 NiCaay Check One Invoice Number: /po # ff3?9 Original Invoice )4 Credit Memo 0 Debit Memo 0 9 Invoice Title & Reference No.: '-v q '- 120, -7 Description: \-4eo-r v -Cxcvn i ne,f- Sc c. nar, c,(7 feu) SChooL rzemovati ate. Pam- or rYi Arts cam, 14W-a0, &' -N Account;Distribution and Amounts Account Number Work Order/ Dollar Amount Function Qom. 34S, 3/.00,00(1 5020 $ O.OO COO, 05457q. ay. 4,2, l 595C s 2e,q INVOICE TOTAL: $a,038.9t-1- Comments: Billing Address: 061, D S-fnct #03 [220 N. 4 5/Ieet sS 400 4111 **************************************************************** City of Renton WA �ea . Receipt ***************** * ****************************************** Receipt Number: R9904144 Amount: 2 , 038 . 94 08/20/99 16 : 01 Payment Method: BILL Notation: RSD 94399 CONNEL Init: CRP Project #: LUA99-120 Type: LUA Land Use Actions Parcel No: 000720-0060 Site Address : 202 S 2ND ST Total Fees : 2 , 038 .94 This Payment 2 , 038 .94 Total ALL Pmts: 2, 038 .94 Balance: . 00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 000 . 345 . 81 . 00 . 0017 Site Plan Approval 2, 000 . 00 000 . 05 . 519 .90 .42 . 1 Postage 38 . 94 • �(° est j.nttec�tuid PROJECT MEETING o� ag BUILDING AND FIRE CODE REVIEW MEETING #2 D61/ELOFII,IE PRE APPLICATION MEETING Cl7y PLANNI OF RENTON Ilk. Bruce E Bloc • PROJECT:Renton High School AUG 2 0 Dole s.B a.-e ..- 1999 RoberiJ Gr_s 2-98092 — 4Da /JJ Colin R Jo-_, DATE: April 29, 1999 2:00pm RECEIVED A. Fred Kira = =- seven PLACE: City of Renton Building/Planning Dept. e. IN ATTENDANCE: h ' Peter Rosen Senior Planner Development Services Corey Thomas Plan Reviewer/Inspector Fire Prevention Bureau Kelh;r Co - . = Arneta Henninger Engineer Specialist II Development Services \.'.. _• Bruce E i,:r - Betty Nokes Economic Dev. Director EDNSP Jack Connell Construction Supervisor Renton School District Nina Cousins Project Civil Engineer CPL Engineering Greg Stack Design Principal Northwest Arch. Co. Guy Overman Project Manager Northwest Arch. Co. The Design team formally requested this meeting in order to review the design and planning that affect the complex modernization of Renton High School. Plans were submitted April 7, 1999. The City Departments reviewed the plans and Peter Rosen distributed copies of the comments submitted (See attached). Code issues were discussed in the previous meeting with the City. Each department that reviewed the plans elaborated on there comments and answered questions from the design team. Discussion: 2.1 Fire Prevention Bureau Issues 2.1 .1 Corey ran calcs and determined 4000 gpm fire flow will be required on the site. The mains in the area will likely be able to supply this demand. Existing hydrants in servicing the High School can be used, but must be upgraded to current standards by adding a 5"storz fitting. Hydrants must meet distance requirements (See attached notes). If hydrant locations are revised, new hydrants will be installed at the revised locations. 2.1 .2. The fire mitigation fees are due at time of building permit pick-up. 2.1 .3 An approved fire sprinkler system and standpipe system is required in Buildings Aw, Ac, An and the PAC only. Building B, may not require additional fire extinguishing systems depending on the extent of development. Fire alarms will be required. See Ordinance 4547. Subsequent to our meeting Corey confirmed if the current fire alarm : is in working order only the nevi or modernized portions of B will require an upgraded fire alarm system unless it exceeds the development limitations of Ordinance 4547. 2 2.1 .4 Corey clarified the north side fire lane access will be necessary in the courtyard area between the main academic building and Building B. This access can travel 150' from the last roadway without a turnaround. This area must be stripped a minimum 20' wide under Project Meeting Minutes Code Review#2 Pre-Application Renton High School • April 29, 1999 Page 2 current regulations. If the design team would like to propose alternatives to this requirement, they must contact the Fire Marshal. 2.1 .5 It is likely more than one Fire Department connection and/or riser on the Sprinkler system will be necessary. The Design team can tap into the sprinkler system at nearly anywhere on the system. 2.1 .6 A Post Indicator valve (PIV)will be required. 2.1 .7 Any hydrant that is located on site but not necessary for fire protection requirements, need not be upgraded. 2.2 Sewer Issues 2.2.1 Nina noted new sanitary side sewers might be installed based on the reconfiguration of buildings, internal plumbing uses, and the new Performing Arts Center. 2.2.2 A separate landscape meter should be considered to avoid unnecessary sewer charges. Renton does not use deduct meters. 2.2.3 No new sanitary mains will be required for this project. 2.3 Water Issues 2.3.1 If the tap from the main is less than 50', the Double Detector Check Valve Assembly (DDCVA) can be located inside the building. 2.3.2 A 3/4" bypass meter will be located on the DDCVA. 2.3.3 The design team will investigate the status of the unidentified water main just west of the school buildings. If this main must be upgraded, it may be possible to protect the site from 2nd Street and Tobin with dead end 8" minimum pipe. The fire protection hose distance limits will govern this configuration of pipe. 2.3.4 Records indicate meters were installed in 1963 and 1980. Arneta did not know how many meters there were. Arneta noted she would review the utility records to determine how many account records there are. The number of accounts corresponds to the number of meters. 2.3.5 If there is no increase in aggregate water meter size, Development fees will not be triggered. If the aggregate meter size is increased, credit will be given for the aggregate size of all meters currently serving the site. The district will be charged just for the net increase. 2.3.6 Add a separate landscape meter. 2.4 Drainage Issues 2.4.1 Nina noted the net impervious area of the current design will not trigger detention requirements. Arneta confirmed the City uses the • 1990 King County surface water manual for detention and water quality. 2.4.2 Nina noted that relative low slope natural drainage to the west may make it difficult to provide bio-filtration locations where the need is greatest. The example of the east event parking area does not have a viable location for a bio-swale. Nina asked that the City consider the use of a wet vault. Arneta asked for further evaluation to determine what could be done. • Project Meeting Minutes Code Review#2 Pre-Application Renton High School • April 29, 1999 Page 3 2.4.3 The surface water Site Development Costs (SDC) will be charged on the net increase of impervious area. Nina estimated this may be as much as 1 acre. 2.4.4 Arneta confirmed all utility and drainage documents must be prepared using the City of Renton drafting standards. No exceptions. 2.5 Zoning Issues 2.5.1 Peter noted the CD(P-1) suffix development standards will require public notice of the adjacent property owners within 300'. The owner will obtain records of the adjacent owners at King County or a title company. 2.5.2 Peter noted any CD zone adjacent to residential zoning will require a Site Review in the context of a Public hearing. Jack expressed frustration at this requirement. When the school district agreed to support the City's request to change the zoning designation of P-1 to CD(P-1 ) it was understood there would not be any revised requirements. Peter did confirm a P-1 zone (without the suffix designation) can process the site review administratively. Betty was going to futher check into this situation. Peter distributed the format requirements for Site Plan Approval. 2.5.3 The site plan review process takes 12-16 weeks. The SEPA review must be processed in order to have a public hearing. Jack confirmed the School District will be the lead agency on the SEPA review. If attendees would like to make corrections or additions to the minutes, please contact Guy Overman of Northwest Architectural Co. by May 20, 1999. Otherwise this will stand as full record of discussions, decisions, and directions in this meeting. cc: All present Rick Stracke, RSD Bob Grossman, NAC Steve McConnell, NAC Jeanne Rosenow, NAC Nina Cousins, CPL Civil Engineers Stacey Young, BCE.Mech. Engineers Steve Savage, CPL Structural Engineers Paul Jones, Huntley-Pascoe Elec. Engineers Dave Andrews, Weisman Design Group Michael Yantis, MYA Acoustical Engineers Peder Knudson, Knudson/Benson Attachments:City of Renton Memorandum , Fire Prevention Bureau 4/13/99 City of Renton Memorandum, Utilities/Drainage 4/18/99 City of Renton Memorandum, Planning/Building 4/29/99 N:2-98092\4\D\4Da-min4-29codereview2PreApp-990429 • cn 7- 32. MEMORANDUM ee44 - ' . °ti DATE: AML_ v i c( v/6., ti TO: Construction Services, Fire Prevention, Plan Review, Project Planner FROM: Jim Hanson, Development Services Division Director ' SUBJECT: New Preliminary Application: f�TOO -<<E 1 s rr-�,oL op az4 LOCATION: LWO 200 A meeting with the applicant has been scheduled for 2=00 PV1 , Thursday, A l.1tl_2C( for one of the 6th floor conference rooms (new city hall). If this meeting is scheduled at 10:00 AM, the MEETING MUST BE CONCLUDED PRIOR TO 11 :00 AM to allow time to prepare for the 11 :00 meeting. Please review the attached project plans prior to the scheduled meeting with the applicant. You will not need to do a thorough "permit level" review at this time. Note only major issues that must be resolved prior to formal land use and/or building permit application submittal. If you are unable to attend the meeting, please send a representative. Please submit your written comments toE-- I at least two (2) days before the meeting. Thank you. • r • - _ 1�Y o CITY OF RENTON I� f> FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU `� MEMORANDUM DATE: April 13, 1999 TO: Peter Rosen, Senior Planner FROM: Corey Thomas, Plans Review Inspector SUBJECT: Preliminary Comments for Renton High School 1. The preliminary fire flow required is 4,000 gpm with one fire hydrant within 150- feet of the structure and three hydrants within 300-feet of the structure. A looped fire main is required to be installed around the building. Existing fire hydrants can be used if they are up to current standards or can be brought up to city standards by adding 5-inch storz fittings. 2. The fire mitigation fees are applicable at the rate of $0.52 per square foot of increased buildingarea only, if any. 3. An approved fire sprinkler system is required to be installed throughout the building. An approved standpipe system is required in the building. 4. An approved fire alarm system is required to be installed throughout the building. 5. Fire access is required on the north side of the building in order to meet section 902.2.1 which requires access to within 150-feet of all points of the building. Roadways are required to be a minimum 20-feet wide with turning radius of 25- feet inside and 45-feet outside. CT:ct rhs • CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: April 18, 1999 TO: Peter Rosen FROM: Arneta Henninger X7298 kok SUBJECT: RENTON HIGH SCHOOL 400 S 2ND ST PREAPPLICATION I have reviewed the preliminary application for this proposed building generally located in Section 18-23N-5E and have the following comments: SEWER: • This project is not located in the Aquifer Protection Zone. • There is an 8" sanitary sewer main in S 2nd St. • There is a 12" and a 15" sanitary sewer main in S Tobin St. • There is a 8" sanitary sewer main in Logan Av S. • There is a 15" sanitary sewer main through the middle of the site. • A sanitary sewer main extension will not be required by this project. • Applicant needs to submit a sanitary sewer plan showing how they will apply sewer service to the new addition. • Any use in the building subject to oils or grease shall require the installation of a grease interceptor or oil/water separator as determined at the time of plan review. • System Development Charges (SDC) are $0.078 per square foot. These fees are collected at the time a construction permit is issued. WATER: • The site is not located in the Aquifer Protection Zone. • The project site is located in the 196 Pressure Zone. RENTON HIGH SCHOOL PREAPP' '"ATI# April 21, 1999 • Page 2 of 3 • There is an existing 8" watermain in S 2nd St from Lake Av S to Whitworth Av S. • There is an existing 12"watermain in S 2nd St from Whitworth Av S to Burnett Av S. • There is an existing 8" watermain in Lake Av S. • There is an existing 12" watermain in S Tobin St. • There is an existing 10" watermain in Logan Av S. • There is an existing watermain through the middle of the site. The City does not have any records on this watermain. The applicant will need to verify the material and exact location of this watermain. This is important since one of the building will be required to tap into this main for the new sprinkler system. If the main is not in good condition and if it is smaller than an 8" it will need to be replaced by the applicant in order to utilize it for any additional water usage. • The watermain that is located on the easterly side of the site currently ends in a fire hydrant. This lead to the fire hydrant is 6" in diameter. If this fire hydrant is needed to meet the project site's fireflow requirements then this pipe will need to be replaced by the applicant and upsized to a minimum 8" in diameter. • Per the City of Renton Fire Marshall, the preliminary fire flow for this project is 4,000 GPM. (This includes credit given for a sprinkler system.) Any new construction must have one fire hydrant capable of delivering a minimum of 1,000 GPM and shall be located within 150 feet of the structure and two additional hydrants (also capable of delivering a minimum of 1,000 GPM) within 300 feet of the structure. This distance is measured along the travel route. • The existing fire hydrants need to be fitted with stortz fittings to bring them up to current City code. This needs to be done by the applicant as a requirement of this project. • The existing water service lines and/or meters may need to be relocated and/or upsized to comply with current City of Renton code. • Plan review recommends an additional meeting with the applicant once the scope of work and architectural drawings are well defined. • Water System Development Charges of $0.1 13 per square foot gross area may be required if not previously paid. The Development Charges are collected as part of the construction permit. STREET IMPROVEMENTS: • This project will not be required to do any street improvements for this site. • This project will not be required to do any additional street lights for this site. RENTON HIGH SCHOOL PREAPP' TCATIO 411. April 21, 1999 Page 3 of 3 DRAINAGE: • • A conceptual drainage plan and report is required with the formal application for the project. A content list for drainage report for conceptual drainage plan is attached. • There are storm drainage facilities in S 2nd St. • There are storm drainage facilities in Lake Av S. • There are storm drainage facilities in S Tobin St. • There are storm drainage facilities in Logan Av S. • A drainage control plan designed per the King County Surface Water Manual may be required for this project. If there is 5,000 square feet or more of new impervious area subject to vehicular use, a Biofiltration Swale is required, depending on the calculations for the site development. • The Surface Water SDC fees of $0.129 (but not less than $385) per square foot of new impervious area may be required if not previously paid. GENERAL: • All required utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed Civil Engineer. • Permit application must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. The fee for review and inspection of these improvements is 5% of the first $100,000 of the estimated construction costs; 4% of anything over $100,000 but less than $200,000, and 3% of anything over $200,000. Half of the fee must be paid upon application for building and construction permits, and the remainder wheri the permits are issued. There may be additional fees for water service related expenses. See Drafting Standards. RENHSPA O CITY OF RENTON . Planning / Building / Public Works MEMORANDUM DATE: April 29, 1999 TO: Pre-Application File FROM: Peter Rosen, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Renton High School Modernization - Pre-Application File#99-32 We have completed a review of the pre-application for the proposed Renton High School Modernization. Listed below and attached on several sheets are our preliminary findings. Although every attempt is made to ensure that these comments are complete, a more thorough examination of the project at the time of application submittal may reveal additional issues that may alter these comments or require additional comments. Zoning. The subject site is zoned Center Downtown (CD), with a Public Zone (P-1) suffix. Expansions of existing schools by less than 10% are allowed as a primary use, with Site Plan Review approval. The proposed auditorium/performing arts center represents less than a 10% expansion of the existing square foot area of the school. The site is located outside the boundaries of the Downtown Core Area. The P-1 zone suffix requires public notice of property owners within a 300-foot radius of the site, 60 days in advance, if the proposal involves a "proposed change of use of the premises.' This does not appear to be relevant because the auditorium is part of the school facilities. Development Standards Setbacks- For buildings 25 feet or less in height,there is no front yard/street setback required. Buildings over 25 feet in height require a 15-foot front yard/street setback. There are no side or rear setback requirements in the CD zone. Landscaping - The CD zone requires a street frontage landscape strip with a minimum width of 10 feet. The 10 feet of landscaping is required on the subject property, landscaping within the street right-of-way does not apply. The Parking and Loading Ordinance requires landscaping equal to 5% of the area of a parking lot over 10,000 square feet in size. The parking area would have to be brought into compliance with this standard if the building is expanded by more than one-third of the existing building area. Building Height- Maximum building height is 95 feet. • Lot Coverage -The lot coverage for buildings may not exceed 65% of the total lot area. Parking - The Parking and Loading Ordinance requires schools to provide 1 parking space per employee and 1 space per 10 enrolled students. The pre-application indicates 175 existing parking spaces for students and 60 spaces for staff parking. The proposal to add an auditorium/performing arts center would not expand the school capacity for students. Outside, public use of the facility would occur primarily during non-school hours. The existing school parking is sufficient to cover parking requirements for the auditorium use. The parking code requires 1 parking space per 4 fixed seats or 1 space for each 100 feet of floor area of the main auditorium or place of assembly, whichever is greater. The proposal includes 550 seats, which would require 138 parking spaces. Therefore, no additional parking would be required. Renton High School Modernization Permit Requirements. The proposal would require SEPA environmental review and Site Plan Review. Commercial zoned properties, (the subject site is zoned Center Downtown) that are adjacent to a single-family zone require a public hearing before the Hearing Examiner. The SEPA environmental review would be conducted first and the public hearing would follow after the end of the SEPA appeal period. The permit process would require approximately 14 to 16 weeks from the time of a complete application. SEPA Environmental Review - A SEPA environmental checklist must be submitted with the application materials. The applicant is responsible for disclosing accurate information regarding potential environmental impacts associated with the proposal. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) will review the proposal, consider mitigation measures, and issue a threshold determination. Site Plan Review: Site Plan Review is required for all development proposals (which meet SEPA thresholds) in the Center Downtown (CD) zone designation. Site Plan Review evaluates site layout elements including the building orientation, pedestrian and vehicular circulation, parking, and landscaping. A proposal is also analyzed for compliance with the code and compatibility with adjacent uses. Site Plan Review evaluation criteria are listed in Section 4-9-200 of the Zoning Code. cc: Jana Hanson Renton High School Modernization O IMO **************************************************************** City of Renton WA Reprinted: 08/20/99 16 : 01 Receipt ******************************************************x;c******** Receipt Number: R9904144 Amount: 2 , 038 . 94 08/20/99 16 : 01 Payment Method: BILL Notation: RSD 94399 CONNEL Init : CRP • Project # : LUA99-120 Type: LUA Land Use Actions Parcel No: 000720-0060 Site Address : 202 S 2ND ST Total Fees : 2, 038 .94 This Payment 2 , 038 .94 Total ALL Pmts : 2 , 038 .94 Balance: . 00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 000 . 345 . 81 . 00 . 0017 Site Plan Approval 2 , 000 . 00 000 . 05 . 519 .90 .42 . 1 Postage 38 . 94