Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
LUA99-098
319W RENTON vv 1/28-23-5 \ 'i Ill AVA-r- - --/-4-4-A _\,,_.._._._._ 1E6-.) E A 8-23-5 RENTON 319E ., , .. ,• .. 1 - .T-1. ,-\.. t. \_ ...,,,.... t, _,,, - -a,,c.,...., .. ..,;____• . • 0\422 At.. MN.. : 1 MOCKUP•Lt.0 ‘ % . - l ' I 1• , Sqls,CTJE -, "F• "-A 11-,43-4 PT, .0 7 0 L \' -< .. ?3 ' 1..c. .•-..,,:..., z . .. . . • . • , 5 <, • .z. .,. A 4 1115 ' from.,w 57.Avz..) ' N. 8TH .-41-- - , 2 N.N. 8TH ST. , •. \ v. ( . • e , 1 i 2 , § .2-,- ,.. 1 r‘ ,... . CO— 6 7 9. 8 9 --41/7 i 41 a: ,•,, 4 ,t IH 61-. 1:10 4 ,- ,, I , 20,0„ VICINITY MAP I L ./.F. ,ei A114--1-3L—L•ke. • 1;4.— 'L— i __ cl; , — z ic -. a tel'Le „:. ' — -- -— 0. i ..‘•FP - - 11-- S I t 1 Z A LIJ r ' I k I A 2 `3. CIIM , • 43 p , '\7:44,11, ,- • ,f z . 1.11%,%APICEP ' II ' ..° , ' "z •„ 3. , z, - • ,• '''' 3 4 .9‘7-ii— ' . 3 2 II lw •., q , 4:2-. li_ . • • - P 1 . ' t .i. :. SA•0•3-11S t LI . ir u• el , . 7 PACIFIC COAST - e 'e0.,FP 47*,; /,.• - i 1 , „____ __ .. _:: tei.,... .,___ ____ i ,.. , . N "677-1 = 9 =ST 69 , . ".9..• 1 o 2:4,,R'jp:s .13,....1, . ,,r),.2„1 rit:::,•;`,4_. ' !b-1-,.--7-.:- -.39 \ie '.1War 11:Et •str7 /11E6M.I.MIE '340,_.5 [,- 1, M CO I , . A tni. •06 a eP M cm' . „ IdiTA sIM gs s to• ,i,,,,i . sk'8 Aw 4 al I= ,_E-?2_ 4 LW Ai MI .. 08 isi-ze Lir , - r7 ..' -eS CZ Ell 1 p . [IH 1 E[ I \ ' iftl LEI • ... ' - , .. • N ,• '. 5TH 57 . a +' - • , •:./W 'Fff]EiE oi 110:I '. '• 1 i..7 .. •.': - , lab, -NA,LK.s-Mil&EV...si,MIEV i 2 . ,.. - 1 '' Z * riF‘*1 mo rutima iiiil q.12[11:3 • ii- 4, • : ; "J 9!!!'...1111113 EFO LOZIZI 113 1.3 1-4-41.". •CI''' ct 0 e)9' 9 IVIED ni -•8..=11 El• Lai: ' ' i':' 1 ,7. 7, • ,itf 7 MiiP7,jk 39111113"M.111 . ,-1-----L----7:1 .f. t.,-4‘ , , . ,„. -nil' il:OuEE a T•Kli, • --- '''''"---- ---' '' — ,,,,„, --- By ,..•:(.6g :.:.:::.. I - MS= '477. 1 '1-7.:iri"ril- 'r2 S 111 rri i 21-i---37-.:71;471 4,-; ;7'..k'C.' f ..1-/,/,,,b< .:;:. 1 s'e x 9,Fig• 3 E. 'Ea PM CB rip miii.ril 3. . 141_...2, D, „, _ _ _, . _ ,-It. . . 1...: 1•11,11/112581:18 B34 . I ..- ''17.";:" :. .. , a5. °- -' 7 r ket 1 ' g:77.1 ;VA] - • • — — N.UNE CS NE VA.SW I/4 SEC.6 (S 8E3013.E N.AD.53/LI) 1 (BAD 63/911 a —At— IE:20T•to i) S 8927'25'E(PLAN BASIS OF BEARINGS) ��Gg�/��41C� N. Sth Street ,���g NN, E Re, — (-- — — S 892725 E _ 1016.11'(R.O.S.) N m m GIR (NM eE ) O L LEGALCRIPTION: O WE ArrACMO EI 4 c M r7 ACCESSOR'S PARCEL": s: , 122300-Cmle-04 .l i 9 2f1'" r .� m / ODw INFORMATION: �� MOW EMDING CCM MGM,EDITOR — t �, wzr --- m = �. I — — N PEA,EDue RAU I. 1 30' 3m / p I » e .- —I_ II 'ems.. — — —• ..DEe .""LEANN ' K EMT., }�� Mill — — — — — s6GI.E E. OCIYYCrC., �HS I S' 1 I ...I..J... . . — —::=— —Ii .� I STOR.eEI to; P : rol'll, �» s 5 j I 4 .,.. ..0- : ,., .i.p LOT COVERAGE:E AMA.11552 ON ,.6e• ,M DI II 1 I . / I u7WN•D."4 e.. ,An-erg. °.o' /s�ll e„� I 8 /,91 II L AREA,ME s. me vom Es �_ IM,ER,•Ian SURFACE AREA.SIMS EE. MST MOOR ER<Ie �.I - ® — / �/ I III BUILDING SETBACKS: D.. Eea SP M y fee p I°\ 6 PL. TER 's am..m.,oar I— I — SAT` •`(pa.W"'L�,�'� ° ewl TAM r raRlNa REAR YARD. s-" lxbgL�fraCOND R z4ees<IE.mmm OF..ac w•�" OM NM MS L / °+vR �� a I� r ,w .m reams a WNW 6r<3:omo a.. K I M Z :a>~/ I .. ( k . . is TOTAL WILDING APR, NW 6. ors" , A AM.IEMEED. `{1� n, PSPI"` / j//////%// j// \\ \\ ¢/�` `__'_JI�I E / ^ a;,Anuwrw'°w ,ee xn TOTAL µ, 0.1 CU V h II j �PAN^j // ` M ___A�. -z BE-za z ° /" e, q > If / r.� ,'f� eat DRANS. OR ICR RY. Q h� j I R-vsmo LOCATION, �ooN A / RER 6 GIE SURVEY / U CsOSLYS.OUTe / `EXIs eroR,DRPROGE Z � : _„� I _ j ETETEH R—— -- -i GENERAL NOTES: o � ■ � \\, �/ I //�_ nrz EEECEm®rGw H�unwMeraBEpAwN RAc aMex `eL .� ,JI �/ / EXISTING • « I / / OF THE WORK MALL Nelr �dE EL MN MEN*irr MD. W1Y11 wrN dLL d0R[Gte ! e4 �' 7,----. i. �► I 0ssi aI s�7, E BUILDING I 20.-C : i E I % / S. IErerinM FEMME. r PROVIDED AS R DRAM IN MILT ONCE, eRE°�s-"w.�,`»R� % =301 .„ 1 I OJT NE Iv.BE DRAW OR IDFDEIE.D O• F 1 0 o e»oR FAER b1HI^ALA,OR PRAMS. ARD/CR I // GA&ATED METER j IEP1 I '� / a» :/ // EXIST.AL. PANTO gvmG 6 MANsacruEx»MODULI rt FOR IEVIE+u Or TM w•ICE s----- / /I / OR TOTED OM-NAM 90° --- • � F CONCRETE A TO/COMM FACE-/ / - - RAGA✓ / I _ 1.A. .s`ALL EME+I OS FOR INTERIOR Aw EXTERIOR DOOM Z '' 1 y I 0" / // • I \ SECTION �I • ALL WORD.NENI.MAC_SE OP,RE,M6r(MALI,p AND INTION Z / AccoloNO� w A acn.ERe eEwlurla, nacrlaIL al • ^\ I I'. HP,j ( .,` ;. o I — r�.mwerae SHALL GUARANTEE ALL narzRAu A.o W ,s P� 1 r.\ / P�R „'-•`�_""`-• AriEr,.NCE e.ouER x*EAR NeXT,PA.v InLAL V W •\ Mr*w I �,c I. sQ mow'e cL• �- • D V[ .❖•�� R .c(� / P ...e,v......d,............m,_...°.. I".ALL urwc aNwL COMPLY wn,cl,r w Imzra IIE RH.w.L.Lro I • E, 1 AL ._.._.. .. `: ,..�J4: ._.�.._.._.._. .._..—I..L.._.._A. It IEalRsor,e- _ y k' \ ,'�..'�.. PROPOSED I �•••••••••••••p••••••• i MULL IRE EXTINGUE ERE NM RMA V. ,Zn ADDIRON I ° gig . . \��:�- IYCLIANO L AND ELECTRON MITTEN TO OE EIBmRD MDER NEW c •:••••• / GI ee'aurz ReR nr.ere,ewel xeIDN I*eIx Rwaerae E-Q `�' PANµC F.F. 30.1 E/ a • aye II''&1N^6'CHAIN LINK FENCE TO l6E GE _ _ __ • . N,..•....:::•.....:::::4�4i _.___—._ 6'MAIN•LINK FENCE° W i I.,.. NEW CONC. I CURB I '444 - •• - ••• /° I LEGEND — NOTESsuNEo SFCRM sue er OEeDs FOR R JJ Rs I •••/•• w K s.wzmaRmz. • IRI• I _I I .. / C �� I O® MANHOLES(SS/se) _ 0 DATUM ne _ Iw(M"zw.l°°'ron. Q N. bth Street,,, / • r g Ee — — °NE s, z LNAo n,1 "� '°'-2"' . / •O"-4" I / j o = _ GAS UNE MS TOPOCROPOOD SURVEY ORAMG ACCURATELY PRESENTS- s I SURFACE MIENS AHD PENNALLECON ASSOC.m.DOES NOT ACCEPT GIR,N.svE FENCE FEATURES LOCATED DURWG 1NE COURSE oF T.SURM ANY UNDERGROUND T tt P (E;o'.":A) _ ——— � —�� SITE PLAN MU]POREa_Va�OND..,. — _ Pe..LINK FENCE MEP.... WR INRa:i/xA/.s. NEW 6'CHAIN LINK FENCE R/-ri • GRAPHIC SCALE 0-34 SOME ,I ID CAS WM. "°°° "� ASSURE r�.e�ur FOR,NEAR ACCURACY aR IbN ,EN s. //�� 1229,>aai�.oRER91 SPOT ELEVATOR fi / - . . . e o c,sEo NONu.E T UNLESS OLLIERRISF NOTED STATED AS �",IKz NMEAMSETO o.mc TRAVERSE (�IK GMT " ro*'s/e'rs Re.R.sisuii .R•.W�E..o.0 FRaK s.Sl,t.s,S I -✓b ID I»xEss omwwsE s wAXWc R I•R!Ur ,En,NATAL ,S0W„ES DOM..ENGINEERS,INC. J°6 N._.SNI_ 1 0 O 04'-6 V4" © O (EkI3TING BUILDING) 1 I Tamar IMP SWIM 5 06 6 it 1 j V4" (NEW AQDITIONI ii S a:. Q:_o:: T:_0:� a:_y:':_a.: _m.� _o. _ 9 R�'x� = ti 1 1 �.N 1 1 1 I. 1 1 � ' H auras mar i. TOM I.I , EaIIPM'?STORAGE I �• r i'' i: ,..i' O )—warn"rau Buci u CRAM „ 1 uoe.un curt r eto4r,s*ones MOCK-UP BAY FABRI TICK OAT STORAGE ANS NEW STORAGE AND ey[m rF-U RMTRNEi4TATION ( U BUILD-LP BAY BUILD-UP BAY i.l Iii ro-Wi) a-Ic-u n Y YIl UP Y O 0.1 I I art wa.c H ea.r.nmas¢r Tc — m II IT r�olk rau e•,ry-e^ i ae I, M0.Lpl MReL MY.000v 'k I I � :e II I CUT M0.E M 7..,,,,T.na„ MtreYIK -v°000R 7 II II O— eye ` � 0 b OW rt1O� Mturioieow ie��w.N. ) Q GROUND FLOOR PLAN ol :IIIII I. 0_Illlll ll ' J IL O 1 i� I tu Vo J . -a i flw y w 9 42 {.1-,.. a 0 C) 0 Q' NEw ADDITION EXISTING BUILDING { NEW ADDITION 7 1-—— 7 I ---------------''HI )1 ——— s il il IIIIIIIIIII�I 1 111IPIII IF III IIIIPIIIIf I 31 1 t -1;it:11;1/ ,i MI I _b 7_ 1 i_ a IIJ INNTINar CAI.SOX DOT 4'GRAlIK EAST ELEVATION AA C y W rb ® O O O O O cdp' EXISTNG WILDING NEW ADDITION p„ )11111111111I1I 1 1111111111111111 1ItII11I11.111" ' Ar - t m- p, rowToi DOM I oosr. L. i � — - — _-_ _ a Nr DIOC MYOlT g TO MAT.DOT. F WEST ELEVATION a SCALE: /B".I'-0•' w w O CO NEW ADDITION 0 EXISTINGdIILDNG 0 0 NEW ADDITION O ii 1110000001011 I li /..__ ro � ruTw osr. §7 a NORTH ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: I/S".I'-0" SCALE, V/,•.I'-C:' A4 I 0 zD. 9 • O O M'-4 V4" ® •_ ii j 1� y V a o- X AP. l Illy o = . �- i e « o� Icy !,io ,O 1!11 i!1 N (l a9 d 0 0 D z eN lij.:;_pp If 13ii vi i.--•f_ ,,Ti{i:i =iil={_-if {flfx ilf 'if Ileg Iil,iilii11r -4. {.-{{• j =i`_€`I Utiiii'iIl illilI i a'_ Ii f € RENTON-KENWORTN SECOND FLOOR PLANure `��` b R D BUILDING EXPANSION w`� EngineeringJ �. w Technologies I + +.. ® ersa ISO aaow.re.wRrw iortw WA. Op. cibbw(LLS 's NYE TR =Y1] .it • �'-rat+-' oR.b SE -- �. 6 `r Rio a Minig . � I i 0: s"' AY C N ' a o CITY OF RENTON -,.1 Cl)mil. Planning/Building/Public Works 1055 South Grady Way - Renton Washington 98055 • JUL 0 29 I I •3 a ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED I rA,7W— : 4, il .,, 135230-1185-01 CHO GYU OONG 859999 1600 148TH AVE SE BELLEVUE WA 98007 _------_ , „,. ,6„ ...\ OTFLIVERAELEe.---- - 1 • - ,,__-:, ,. . i I/- inr I AS ADDRESSED ::: ., . # IMAM TO FORWARD '--''''-;4 LRETURN 10 SENDER %'-. .:, Wirlikw.e,- '710417\- #115 4 lia"hAdimaanwanum.uunhtmliA CnMMENTS 2�d s V . � q -098 ,EC.F 4 4 PTTTTTTTTTTTTTTf TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTtTfal 082305-9109-01 STATE OF WASHINGTON 667777 082305-9129-07 LILLEGARO LEONARO M 553628 LILLEGARD DOROTHEA 73-900 GRAPEVINE ST PALM DESERT CA 92260 082305-9148-04 STATE OF WASHINGTON 667777 082.305-9164-03 9ERGER CHRIS PGMARLENE 180634 ERERGER CHRISTOPHER JGCASEY L 410 SUNSET BLVD N PENTON WA 98055 VAN DYKE JERRY+KELLY 879999 346 GARDEN AVE N RENTON WA 98055 135230-0235-03 FETTEROLF DAVID W 829999 338 GARDEN AVE N RENTON WA 98055 135230-0240-06 JACOBSON COLLEEN 8 739999 336 GARDEN AVE N RENTON WA 98055 135230-0245-01 BRYANT MABLE 299999 334 GARDEN AVE N RENTON WA 98055 135230-0295-00 HENDERSON CORRINE E ET AL 669999 359 MEADOW AVE N RENTON WA 98055 135230-0300-03 SEE DICK 431759 1276 MARINE VIEW DR ANACORTES WA 98221 115230-0310-01 ONOFERSON RONALD J 509999 10653 CARNELL AVE S SEATTLE WA 9817E 135230-0315-06 PIEPER EARL R & FRANCES M 345 MEADOW AVE N RENTON WA 98055 135230-0320-09 THOMAS VERNIE E 341 MEADOW AVE N RENTON WA 98055 135230-0325-04 9ARRETT JOHN M 231775 339 MEADOW AVE N RENTON WA 99055 135230-0510-09 BACKMAN ERIK E+BIRGITTA E OO9999 14408 SE MAY VALLEY PO RENTON WA 98059 135230-0520-07 ROLLER ROBERT L 669999 35C MEADOW AVE N PENTON WA 98155 135230-0525-02 LORBEREGT FRANKIE L 699999 344 MEADOW AVE N RENTON WA 98055 135230-0530-05 MALESIS ENTERPRISES 871996 12865 SE 223RD PL KENT WA 98031 135230-0535-00 RORERTS PETER+MARIAN+ROLLER519999 336 MEADOW AVENUE NORTH RENTON WA 98O55 135230-0585-09 BACKMAN ERIK PEHR EBENHARD+78COO8 16408 SE MAY VALLEY RD NEWCASTLE WA 98059 135230-0595-07 MUNSON RONALD W+FLIZABETH A569999 8648 S 134TH ST SEATTLE WA 98178 135230-0605-05 MCCORMICK HUGH M+DELORES M 759999 343 FACTORY AVE N RENTON WA 98055 135230-0610-C8 GARDNER RONALD L 329999 337 FACTORY AVE N RENTON WA 98055 135230-1185-01 CHO GYU DONG 859999 1600. 148TH AVE SE BELLEVUE WA 98007 135230-1205-07 SEATTLE OPERA ASSOCIATION 969999 P 0 BOX 9248 SEATTLE WA 98109 135230-1225-03 FRANCIS AND BUTTNICK LLC 779999 204 1ST AVE S SEATTLE WA 98104 135230-1245-09 WALDENBURGER FRIEDEL C104 345 N 3RD PL RENTON WA 98055 135230-1265-04 TONDA ERNEST J 250809 528 EDMONDS AVE NE RENTON WA 98056 I3523C-1275-02 TPNUA ERNEST J 250809 528 EDMONDS AVE NE RENTON WA 98056 135230-1285-00 TERRY JOHN E ELIZABETH 1532 .MAR ION AVE RENTON WA 98055 135230-1295-08 FAKHARZADEN M HAOI 660758 PC BOX 78404 SEATTLE WA 98178 135230-1300-01 CITY OF RENTON 209700 200 MILL AVE SOUTH RENTON WA 98055 172305-9111-06 ALMONT GARRETT L 739999 10113 416TH AVE SE NORTH FEND WA 98045 172305-9122-03 TING CHAO-TSAN+MEI NWA 651183 13219 NE 10TH Pl BELLEVUE WA 98005 172305-9150-08 KING KENNETH 273975 350 SUNSET BLVD N RENTON WA 98055 722300-0105-00 THE BOEING COMPANY 650035 PO PDX 3703 M/S u1F-09 SEATTLE WA 98124 722300-0115-09 THE BOEING COMPANY 650035 PO BOX 3703 M/S 1:1F-09 SEATTLE WA 98124 756460-0055-04 THE HOEING COMPANY 650035 PO BOX 3703 M/S C1F-09 SEATTLE WA 98124 756460-0095-06 NIEMEYER CHARLES A II 809999 3605 334TH AVE S SEATTLE WA 98144 756460-0105-04 RENTON SCHOOL DIST 403 712777 435 MAIN AVE S RENTON WA 98055 756460-0170-04 RENTON SCHOOL CIST 403 712777 435 MAIN AVE S RENTON WA 9P055 ��,_. ... •.L.rf-M*11 6U035 PC BOX 3703 M/S V1F-09 SEATTLE WA 98124 082305-9176-09 PUGET SOUND ENERGY/ELEC 790503 PROPERTY TAX DEPT PO BOX 90868 BELLEVUE WA 9a009 082305-9197-04 PACCAR INC 1400 4TH AVE N RENTQN WA 98055 135230-0215-07 GOETZ MATTHEW M 159999 356 GARDEN AV N RENTON WA 98055 135230-0220-00 RUSSO JAMES J+EDNA 829999 350 GARDEN AVE N RENTQN WA 98055 CITY OF RENTON .L.7-1,g Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator August 31, 1999 Mr. J.A. Bredal, A.I.A. Pacific Engineering Technologies, Inc. 1300 Dexter Avenue North, Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98109 SUBJECT: Kenworth Research Lab Project No. LUA-99-098,ECF Dear Mr. Bredal: This letter is to inform you that the comment and appeal periods have ended for the Environmental Review Committee's (ERC) Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the above-referenced project. No appeals were filed on the ERC determination. This decision is final and application for the appropriately required permits may proceed. The applicant must comply with all ERC Mitigation Measures. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (425) 430-7270. For the Environmental Review Committee, Peter Rosen Project Manager cc: Kenworth Truck Company/Owners FINAL 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the ' day of ftlkolLt` , 1999, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing efieY��,i-att0--v documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing Department of Ecology Don Hurter WSDOT KC Wastewater Treatment Division Larry Fisher Washington Department of Fisheries David F. Dietzman Department of Natural Resources Shirley Lukhang Seattle Public Utilities Duwamish Indian Tribe Rod Malcom Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Joe Jainga Puget Sound Energy (Signature of Sender) `, dtra I✓ 5� � �v STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) \\ c I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that C7t71r�.clru, wee L signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the ulses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. / 40.44A /� lY• Notary- blic in and for the State of shington 1 MARILYN KAMCHEFF ANOTARY PUBLIC ► Notary (Print) MARILYN KAMCHEFF STATE OF WASHINGTON r My appointment expRisAPPOINTMENT EXPIRES:t5 29-03 COMMISSION EXPIRES a IE lfsiF ands Kev\wo*-k-k e•,c avck\ u_k:b Project Number: q9 - Dg , NOTARY.DOC CITY C, ' RENTON sal Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator August 11, 1999 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Subject: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC)on August 10, 1999: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED KENWORTH RESEARCH LAB LUA-99-098,ECF Proposal to expand the existing Kenworth Truck Company research and development lab. Two areas of the existing building would be expanded: a 60-foot by 60-foot first floor addition to;the south and a 20-foot by 60-foot first and second floor expansion along the northeast elevation. The total area of the building expansion would be 6,141 sq. ft. The total building area after expansion would be approximately 16,000 sq. ft. The height of the existing and new building expansion would be 24 feet. There are 13 existing parking spaces and the applicant would add two spaces with the expansion. Existing access to the site off Garden Avenue North would be unchanged. Location: 790 Garden Avenue North. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM August 30, 1999. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. If you have questions, please call me at(425)430-7219. For the Environmental Review Committee, Peter Rosen Project Manager cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division Larry Fisher, Department of Fisheries David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources Don Hurter, Department of Transportation Shirley Lukhang, Seattle Public Utilities Duwamish Tribal Office Rod Malcom, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (Ordinance) Joe Jainga, Puget Sound Energy agncyltr\ 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, Washington 98055 --- .. _�_l . CITY GA:' RENTON NAL I - ,, Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator August 12, 1999 Mr. J.A. Bredal,A.I.A. Pacific Engineering Technologies, Inc. 1300 Dexter Avenue North, Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98109 SUBJECT: Kenworth Research Lab Project No. LUA-99-098,ECF Dear Mr. Bredal: This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) and is to advise you that they have completed their review of the subject project. The ERC, on August 10, 1999, issued a threshold Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated with Mitigation Measures. See the enclosed Mitigation Measures document. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM August 30, 1999. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. The preceding information will assist you in planning for implementation of your project and enable you to exercise your appeal rights more fully, if you choose to do so. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at(425)430-7219. For the Environmental Review Committee, 01Qt* e ..,,,,..„ Peter Rosen Project Manager cc: Kenworth Truck Company/Owners Enclosure dnsmltr 1055 South Grady Way- Renton, Washington 98055 atThis nannr rnntaine 5(10L,rarvrlwri malarial 9(1/nnet rnnc,Imcr CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) • MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-99-098,ECF APPLICANT: Richard Jordal PROJECT NAME: Kenworth Research Lab DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to expand the existing Kenworth Truck Company research and development lab. Two areas of the existing building would be expanded: a 60-foot by 60- foot first floor addition to the south and a 20-foot by 60-foot first and second floor expansion along the northeast elevation. The total area of the building expansion would be 6,141 sq. ft. The total building area after expansion would be approximately 16,000 sq. ft. The height of the existing and new building expansion would be 24 feet. There are 13 existing parking spaces and the applicant would add two spaces with the expansion. Existing access to the site off Garden Avenue North would be unchanged. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 790 Garden Avenue North MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee equal to $0.52 per square foot of the building addition. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of Building Permits. CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-99-098,ECF APPLICANT: Richard Jordal PROJECT NAME: Kenworth Research Lab DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to expand the existing Kenworth Truck Company research and development lab. Two areas of the existing building would be expanded: a 60-foot by 60- foot first floor addition to the south and a 20-foot by 60-foot first and second floor expansion along the northeast elevation. The total area of the building expansion would be 6,141 sq. ft. The total building area after expansion would be approximately 16,000 sq. ft. The height of the existing and new building expansion would be 24 feet. There are 13 existing parking spaces and the applicant would add two spaces with the expansion. Existing access to the site off Garden Avenue North would be unchanged. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 790 Garden Avenue North Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. BUILDING Follow recommendations of the soils engineer. FIRE 1. The preliminary fire flow required is 1,750 gpm. Two fire hydrants are required. One fire hydrant is required within 150-feet of the proposed structure and one fire hydrant is required within 300-feet of the structure. 5-inch storz fittings are required on existing hydrants. 2. An approved fire sprinkler system is required to be installed throughout the structure. The proposed addition is not allowed to be built over the existing fire sprinkler supply main. AIRPORT The proposed building heights are indicated as 28 feet above present ground level. This will pose no problem to airport operations. CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-99-098,ECF APPLICANT: Richard Jordal PROJECT NAME: Kenworth Research Lab DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to expand the existing Kenworth Truck Company research and development lab. Two areas of the existing building would be expanded: a 60-foot by 60-foot first floor addition to the south and a 20-foot by 60-foot first and second floor expansion along the northeast elevation. The total area of the building expansion would be 6,141 sq. ft. The total building area after expansion would be approximately 16,000 sq. ft. The height of the existing and new building expansion would be 24 feet. There are 13 existing parking spaces and the applicant would add two spaces with the expansion. Existing access to the site off Garden Avenue North would be unchanged. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 790 Garden Avenue North LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM August 30, 1999. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: August 16, 1999 DATE OF DECISION: August 10, 1999 SIGNATURES: // r/?iq Greggi m rma ministrator DATE Departm n of P ning/Building/Public Works /a/ 7im pher , Ad in s rator DATE Community Se��, ?-70 ?7) • Lee W eel r, Fire Chief DATE Renton Fire Department dnsmsig CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-99-098,ECF APPLICANT: Richard Jordal PROJECT NAME: Kenworth Research Lab DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to expand the existing Kenworth Truck Company research and development lab. Two areas of the existing building would be expanded: a 60-foot by 60- foot first floor addition to the south and a 20-foot by 60-foot first and second floor expansion along the northeast elevation. The total area of the building expansion would be 6,141 sq. ft. The total building area after expansion would be approximately 16,000 sq. ft. The height of the existing and new building expansion would be 24 feet. There are 13 existing parking spaces and the applicant would add two spaces with the expansion. Existing access to the site off Garden Avenue North would be unchanged. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 790 Garden Avenue North Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. BUILDING Follow recommendations of the soils engineer. FIRE 1. The preliminary fire flow required is 1,750 gpm. Two fire hydrants are required. One fire hydrant is required within 150-feet of the proposed structure and one fire hydrant is required within 300-feet of the structure. 5-inch storz fittings are required on existing hydrants. 2. An approved fire sprinkler system is required to be installed throughout the structure. The proposed addition is not allowed to be built over the existing fire sprinkler supply main. AIRPORT The proposed building heights are indicated as 28 feet above present ground level. This will pose no problem to airport operations. CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-99-098,ECF APPLICANT: Richard Jordal PROJECT NAME: Kenworth Research Lab DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to expand the existing Kenworth Truck Company research and development lab. Two areas of the existing building would be expanded: a 60-foot by 60- foot first floor addition to the south and a 20-foot by 60-foot first and second floor expansion along the northeast elevation. The total area of the building expansion would be 6,141 sq. ft. The total building area after expansion would be approximately 16,000 sq. ft. The height of the existing and new building expansion would be 24 feet. There are 13 existing parking spaces and the applicant would add two spaces with the expansion. Existing access to the site off Garden Avenue North would be unchanged. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 790 Garden Avenue North MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee equal to $0.52 per square foot of the building addition. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of Building Permits. NoncE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: KENWORTH RESEARCH LAB PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-99-098,ECF Proposal to expand the existing Kenwor h Truck Company research end development lab.Two areas of the existing building would be expanded:a 60-foot by 60-fool first floor addition to the south and a 20-fool by 60-foot first and second floor expansion along the northeast elevation.The total area of the building expansion would be 6,141 sq.ft.The total building area after expansion would be approximately 16,000 sq.ft.The height of the existing and new building expansion would be 24 feet.There are 13 existing parking spaces and the applicant would add two spaces with the expansion.Existing access to the site off Garden Avenue North would be unchanged.Location:790 Garden Avenue North. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC)HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed In writing on or before 5:00 PM August 30,1999. Appeals must be hied In welting together with the required$75.00 application lea with:Hearing Examiner,City of Renton,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11B.Additional Information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office,(425)430-6510.M II` �y• { • • 111 \j\\\`a\• 1 i g:1 S • ..2_•_. ! '..— 4 II, ..I-,..--- ' -*_;' 1 I . 'O i 1 ,1 ,/,I 1 I' _ F I.I"—•r a Rill ._.,'SFr i'. ^�_ 1tr C• IG�.�// •e'' .' FOR FURTHER INFORMATION,PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON,DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT(425)430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file Identification. CERTIFICATION I, 'j 'ICE JVVEPAA , hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document were posted by me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on AaIC9Ii1S 1 I'?--, iq -- Signed: U ATTEST: Subcribed swom before me,a Nortary Public, ' or the State of Washington residing in ._1,t .�„ , on the — 'Y,day of .� %i �L, ILYN KAMCHEFF NOTARY PUBLIC Q 4 STATE OF:IN ' �i�"'n coM UISSION EXPIRES '. UU ff .,x NEr 2003 k MARILYN KAMCHEFF MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES:6-29-03 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Charlotte Ann Kassens first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of the NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETRMINTION SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON,WASHINGTON 600 S. Washington Avenue, Kent, Washington 98032 The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated for the fol- a daily newspaper published seven (7)times a week. Said newspaper is a legal lowing project under the authority of the newspaper of general publication and is now and has been for more than six months Renton Municipal Code. prior to the date ofpublication, referred to, printed andpublished in the English language KENWORTH RESEARCH LAB 9 � LUA-99-098,ECF continually as a daily newspaper in Kent, King County, Washington. The South County Environmental review to expand the exist- Journal has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the ing Kenworth Truck Company research and development lab. Location: 790 State of Washington for King County. Garden Ave.No. The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the South County Appeals of the environmental deter- Journal not in supplemental form)which was regularly distributed to the subscribers before must PMbe filedA in writing 19on or (andPP 9 Y before 5:00 August 30, 1999. during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee Kenworth Research Lab with: Hearing Eminer, C Rentonity of Rentokn, South Grady Way, Renton WAs 98055. Appeals xato the Examiner City Cler,are gov- as published on: 8/16/99 erned by City of Renton Municipal Code Section1055 4-8-1 from the 1 B. Additional process information regarding appeal may be The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of$43.13, obtained charged to Acct. No. 8051067 Office,(425)the 430 651So0. Published in theSouth County Journal August 16, 1999.6471 Legal Number 6471 / Legal Clerk, South County Journal Subscribed and sworn before me on this 1/Crday of 4 -, 19 C:62 -77—S- 44,xi, tt66Plp//,' oo��N f.1. FF�vAQ '17� � O . •%..*r�`S"�"j�'piy�.,/,91op Notary Public of the State of Washington Y �� t5,®TAR), ya residing in Renton �o `` o King County, Washington ,i,qJ 2 6 Z•. C't`.oa Os'.f,-Opti mA*►,,'•‘'%.,a NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. KENWORTH RESEARCH LAB LUA-99-098,ECF Environmental review to expand the existing Kenworth Truck Company research and development lab. Location: 790 Garden Ave. No. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM August 30, 1999. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. Publication Date: August 16, 1999 Account No. 51067 dnsmpub.dot STAFF City of Renton REPORT Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE A. BACKGROUND ERC MEETING DATE: August 10, 1999 Project Name: Kenworth Research Lab Applicant: Richard Jordal File Number: LUA-99-098, ECF Project Manager: Peter Rosen Project Description: Proposal to expand the existing Kenworth Truck Company research and development lab. Two areas of the existing building would be expanded: a 60-foot by 60-foot first floor addition to the south and a 20-foot by 60-foot first and second floor expansion along the northeast elevation. The total area of the building expansion would be 6,141 sq. ft. The total building area after expansion would be approximately 16,000 sq. ft. The height of the existing and new building expansion would be 24 feet. There are 13 existing parking spaces and the applicant would add two spaces with the expansion. Existing access to the site off Garden Avenue North would be unchanged. Project Location: 790 Garden Avenue North Exist. Bldg. Area gsf 9,921 sq. ft. Proposed New Bldg. Area gsf 6,141 sq. ft. Site Area 95,334 sq. ft. Total Building Area gsf 16,062 sq. ft. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Non-Significance, Mitigated(DNS, M) , _ 1 ..r.,__\., .. \; \\‘'..\_-.‘, iti 5r.!::,;°: "'N m �;!1�; ddrryy _ .�� q. {Il xl;l�: di tl 'm yy• 4 � w I If 1 ,zall'e, r44:-LbCOI z �' \ I I e II(eLgl �II'�oI���°,1'-1 � `�su• �o u_ r_7 y 1 fin` n L. Project Location Map :�I' :o r" % Ie i Ili / ercrpt.doc EEw gi I Ly' ., gyp°fp, r:.!';;in? i iv: Ff ttr Fb I... I, ,, f"1 y,,,, City of Renton P/B/PW Department Environmer eview Committee Staff Report KENWORTH RESEARCH LAB LUA-99-098, ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF AUGUST 10, 1999 Page 2 of 4 B. RECOMMENDATION Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINATION OF DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE NON- SIGNIFICANCE- MITIGATED. Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. X Issue DNS-M with 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period followed by a 14 day Appeal Period. C. MITIGATION MEASURES 1. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee equal to $0.52 per square foot of the building addition. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. BUILDING Follow recommendations of the soils engineer. FIRE 1. The preliminary fire flow required is 1,750 gpm. Two fire hydrants are required. One fire hydrant is required within 150-feet of the proposed structure and one fire hydrant is required within 300-feet of the structure. 5-inch storz fittings are required on existing hydrants. 2. An approved fire sprinkler system is required to be installed throughout the structure. The proposed addition is not allowed to be built over the existing fire sprinkler supply main. AIRPORT The proposed building heights are indicated as 28 feet above present ground level. This will pose no problem to airport operations. ercrpt.doc ' City of Renton P/B/PW Department Environmer 'eview Committee Staff Report KENWORTH RESEARCH LAB LUA-99-098,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF AUGUST 10, 1999 Page 3 of 4 D. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS In compliance with RCW 43.21 C. 240, the following project environmental review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. 1. Earth Impacts: The site is relatively flat and paved with asphalt. The building addition would replace existing pavement and erosion is highly unlikely. Potential erosion impacts that could occur during construction would be mitigated by City Code requirements for a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) and Construction Mitigation Plan, approved prior to issuance of Construction Permits. A geotechnical report was prepared by Hart Crowser, Inc. In accordance with the geotechnical report, the building addition foundation would be placed on concrete auger cast pilings. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are recommended. Nexus: NA. 2. Water Impacts: Site stormwater is presently collected in drainage lines and discharged to the City's storm sewer system in Garden Avenue to the west of the site and to North 8th Street north of the site. Because the site is currently paved and the building addition would replace existing pavement, no net increase in runoff is anticipated. Water quality may improve since existing asphalt pavement used by vehicles would be replaced by building rooftop. Presently, wastewater associated with remediation activities on the site is discharged to the METRO sewer system. If contaminated soil materials are encountered during excavation, stormwater which contacts contaminated debris would be collected, analyzed, treated (if necessary) and then discharged to the METRO sewer system. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are recommended. Policy Nexus: NA 3. Fire Protection Impacts: The proposal would add new construction to the City and would potentially impact the City's Fire Department. A Fire Mitigation Fee applies to all new construction at a rate of $0.52 per square foot of building. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to issuance of Building Permits. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee equal to $0.52 per square foot of the building addition. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Policy Nexus: Fire Mitigation Fee Resolution and adopting ordinance, Environmental Review (SEPA) 4. Transportation Impacts: The environmental checklist states that the building expansion would not result in additional employees nor additional traffic trips. The City's traffic mitigation fee is required only ercrpt.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Environmer 'eview Committee Staff Report KENWORTH RESEARCH LAB LUA-99-098, ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF AUGUST 10, 1999 Page 4 of 4 where development would result in an increase in the number of traffic trips on the local street system. Therefore, no traffic mitigation fee is required. There are 13 existing parking spaces and the applicant would add 2 spaces with the building expansion. The 15 parking spaces comply with the number of required parking spaces for both the existing building and the proposed expansion. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are recommended. Policy Nexus: NA 5. Environmental Health Impacts: The subject site is a remediated "superfund" site, with a clean-up plan performed under a consent decree with the State Department of Ecology (DOE). All excavations would be monitored and performed by certified environmental contractors. The contractor's health and safety plan would minimize the possibility of exposure to health hazards. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are recommended. Policy Nexus: NA 6. Land Use Impacts: The subject site is located in the Employment Area-Industrial (EAI) designation of the Comprehensive Plan and the Heavy Industrial (IH) zone. The manufacturing, processing, assembly of transportation equipment is allowed as a primary permitted use in the IH zone. The proposed expansion of the existing building is consistent with EAI policies and the development standards of the IH zone. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are recommended. Policy Nexus: NA E. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS The proposal has been circulated to City Departmental/Divisional Reviewers for their review. Where applicable, these comments have been incorporated into the text of this report as Mitigation Measures and/or Notes to Applicant. X Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. Environmental Determination Appeal Process Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM August 30, 1999. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. ercrpt.doc R.UM 9F 1[TA MT 1/4 MC.• p WW1.?c •.AD$3/* 1 MAD Wan 1 S B977'25.E(PLAN BASIS OF BEARINGS) J1R- - - - - -fig::«::r, m'TAR 3/. o.snc Y N. Sth Street emPQ-Y - - - - - _ S 09.2725.E _ _ 1016.11_(Rot) _ ' ^�•w«I- O LEGALDESCRIPTION: Via] M 0 .H ATTAasm WOO '{ • r7 AGGESSOR'S PARCEL•: �,� -ow•LoL r Or VE300-omm-a fI d r "� N,m„d� / _ CODE INFORMATION: f i / m.w. w i n..v Aar w.0 3 30' 30' I .. o Ii _ _ _ _ —1- I I,� •. - - - .L.R; PA(MAW �.L �,l2��).; r �_ •� I so E.sw.. ororocr aware nn.cran, allrre ��..1 il , I Yk+A' --w� I i 3`+ ,� /i mcorariwcriw «•Ta.Ao•, E)1'ii5 .� e I r LOT COVERAGE: ! J N 3WI;� MOOT. q ��Ali �' i j A III ........ ...Al ;i LOT CO.a.AW N• nlT'.TG,r No LOOMAP.ARA.....• MOOR AP DC / i° ) / I II i BI.IILDING SETBACKS: T.:.u: OW•:<WORSP .OK wp'�'' • / i. PL TER v.r.n ii -— I i�\`- r' / ,1I W'�'t'MOtNORMA ET NW ROM MsY d s - / (lb. A' \ . �\ / j��������� \ \\ /A\d / .MOO��• O.A.. g V .vl \ ` ("v YA� % //�\\\;` lyt /• II --��� `. _ami / OIOCR mAL A.SPOIVIAto• aw Ftif \ :a"°'FF.eIso ! j� �' i/ // r.F- „�, // .TaT.TOnY�Au. NO puma O r.,,•m«..O..,IO•A�.Ls.% A' / ADo'N .sn.... r a`°"<e Of Lo4T'On z 7, / j \:_; / ( j:a".� ... Ara. .,E W °°�'� I I % \ C�—— —�——— — I - GENERAL NOTES: t !. L DO MOT SCA.WOW. . MD VOW ALL POMO&WC MOW COPOITOR AT ON • {t— 3 i '11♦•_ 1 I . �// LaST«C j / . I ; WALL WC M r.a•..TO rAruwa..+I.0 YlN ALL Aware • qq .wo«c I / / M SOW DOOM«a.TTM•o. I��- ssq'.r]0..i • / f r.b l• v •• T 1 ! d/ > Tm'.TITM MAMMA GOTL.T6r AO...+®Y.DRAW- way • I / ♦� II NV/ I �.:•T--" S I ., li F� % cwnero wrAsar nw o,v pommy o / IRELtem4D '/ > - / WPM,MOM AG PAWS na+nAanEr ,TM, nwO/p ANDAa. S GAS NER\R (I/ 1 I / j / MINN11'CLAY OWN] �...K.+a.WOO.O.T.raw terlu•r OR qr�. Qr- / YDM s6Y11.•I� / //I / •YK.AG rY$ « O.MIOT!«ITN G�' RMY u!«.pRNL VYI.«CW C\ yo���oT y..OR FOR co OWITIVE WOWS c • � l_t_ --_I / /1'w-"—�'�— -.,� eo I/� , • c .o iE o.on.aw uauw Arow 0 IC ' \ II— % / ' �I — — uowr�r Ae►AVM «rim row"ILL eY«mev...�YT.Msur+nraR.rAn•m. / / / C, a .ay.ALL wa+aw WOO.row.ne.aw ro COMM COOP. '• 1 I / — I. -1I SECTION I • _ / I I ,, / I \_ I .UL,. ,r.-..-.- ALL •ACCORD..Wu n.,.n RR a.M WOW CTIWIM T Pi�O.:G�Y.;< _ 1 , ` .1 i0' . ro. ( �•': :'V / n. R `�:.� 7 ^7^ .riar.nu WOW •w.swrn WTI o.«r V<O y._.._.._.�.._ ._..`.. _.._.. � .._. I — ALL 1 �;s.:•: .. •'_ / _ 1_— _•—____ ,--Y-a== ROM.�„ aa.L.Y R am a e a,. .w„Y, 1 z ` ; D j •fit::;.{i�7•--:.:' . I L.»T�Lr..o.,..«Y..e,Y.. 13 a NAW C Egk F.F. 10.1 \..i❖:❖:❖::: . / e.TcoYhc.L MpARATE s ..,..• MOMS TO s ranTaa WOW i 'El.ST»a'aA«L«K FENCE To,aL nc / . i ``'' 0 Ill CONC. ` "� CURB .. ! I L[QrWD NOT=8: • Y 1 •I / Ma utl_ m c..,. ..Y.r r..ai wows ' t ^'° / a oA I o o mow .,Y al =- _ oATUY`W ow PO Mond^a` ;mow'Mos ~ D CL N, bth Stre t�.Tm, p• I "''"' / 'e-'" ! �• / '/ j POLL ® ..a . _SO- MIN.— a: a O°..:.`Sc.".:r�`O.tetalux AM.rar.Y,....O Ya.�r. I(;n'.�.'+r I I \ -�--_ / �m o::/.T.<.,�0...,,, — Ya as BO FFEMMES.1111.; .. :N OF::5EVE:µ a a' R .°�' =z—— -r= SITE PLAN .a./�.. - ..mn.ano Pow.Try .. ..an ro rarer ea NEW•O AW L.«FENCE ...... GRAPHIC SCALE ( 0-1 s�L / ror a...a, OF WS era..Na u.as a,Y.N. A I �1L� 660. • •1.Far T • r`s woos°s .•r E sw ww .�r awn,.00 sow..m�.'.FR o»TWO TO room �.....�.. ,�, '.s.,_ -n�_\, F r.r n u..Ls o*ua sr.o too n..c O 0.00. •ssm. m..rNc o‘ms.s.c. ^�•.'•'."`.Y /rrt.�wrrM m' Ss• .roe NM., i 0 O O 0 IM'-S V4" (DGST►L'OU4DNS) i !1L tl'-O" ]O'-D" 42•- " 0 ' tY-7 V4. t 1d-O' 1 W-7 1/4' K' ( 1 osna mown j AAA Fur aArol $ 6 BB off-IP I SKOP C 3 _AIM" (NEW ADDITION) ,al x = , �.� Nor r _ t{7fi11 EaxU 1 T STORAGE y� 0 i trE (\\y-�y (-0 mo e4. ONI rrM1.NN e / IMa me pqI YCrWQW I/ YOv[. o11a. /^� 5 MOCK-UP OAT F TKH OAT STORAGE AND NEW STORAGE AND F�V y[� r OF-I) WSTRIlTENTAT1ON V OVILD-Ir OAT OUIW-LP OAT 1.1 (S-IF-u lb-IR-v e 44 T t s .1 t !I, v Otr I` 8Q ' 1II 1 11 I7- � ~ �¢ V. II L CONFERENCE �� ii i M i1OR NM*0,u°ssr WA.:Dr II i nommrwnr.+►000lr OAS 11I= To ru,ox owns DOOM 0 z -4 J GROUND FLOOR PLAN al .1111111 e acme. va.r-m We IIII@' 8 LL 4 ri H i sIrc R • __ r.,•.r.,_ A2 ,. I »� 0 0 ... | , i 14 0 0 _,/ J. g ~ iii \ } Iol © § . it o �` � «» .0 ƒ \ P. "r | | | | 0 n 7 °m 0 z 1 Will fit:dit:: illiiitfif : i A:. i®t iI! !t +i1i 1 rjild Pill ' ��4 . ; ip,,,h4 .-, | RENTON—.�«. SECOND FLOOR PLAN P §c -- ' AMOK | RI UILoNGE¥4NI En e g gies — ____ __I `. § i O NEW ADDITION O O ExIeTNG OWLDNG O O 0 NEW ADDITION III iI Ii11hIIIR "IIIfIIII nil 'mum I I r_J 0 114101 —. } 'L l t ..—r�r �- LII� - _ — K_ _. _ 1y • . �.Q ... �OeNw CMS NM ���\.._ , EAST ELEVATION �0 (56810 ymr 0 O O O O EXISTING BUILDING NEW ADDITION 0 0..I W wa r___--- -- - ------- — ___------__T ___---- W 1 l a b =air l�lrnflflln(f TIRl If1 11R1- ' ` t II -- - I I -- -_ -_-- ...ma.. A/� -= =_ - --_ — — — — _ _e_ _ Nr.MR Purworrp TO MA.MDT. WEST ELEVATION 9GALE. VB"•1'-0" Ui W J W Ci O MEW 0 N ADDITION EXI STNG GWLDNG © O NEW ITI 0 ADDON ii W • °X IflhIIIIIIlluu1 IihIiliIhhIiIiIIiIiIiliIhIiIihlIiIiIililll' - i W- - us 6 MOOMOOOOHOIOIOIOOIMOIIOOMOHNOOIOMOMMOOM S 1 lusl 1 § i NORTH ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION BGALE: Ve".r-m" ecALE. ' .I'-O" Washington State Northwest Region Department of Transportation 15700 Dayton Avenue North Sid Morrison P.O. Box 330310 Secretary of Transportation Seattle,WA 98133-9710 (206)440-4000 July 6, 1999 DEVCITYOFRE"n'- Peter Rosen City of Renton JUL U b 1999 Development Services Division 1055 S Grady Way RECELV D Renton, WA 98055-3232 RE: SR 405, Vic. MP 4.70, CS 1743 LUA-99-098, ECF: Kenworth Research Lab Dear Mr. Rosen: Thank you for giving us the opportunity to review the Notice of Application for the Kenworth Research Lab, which is located at 790 Garden Avenue North in Renton. We have reviewed the subject document and have no comments. The project will not have significant impact on the state highway system. If you have any questions, please contact Don Hurter or John Collins of my Developer Services section. Don's number is (206) 440-4664; John's is (206) 440-4915. Sincerely, raig J. Stone, P.E. Area Administrator- South King CJS:jc JTC cc: file CITY OF RENTON f DEVELOPEN • MT;SE RV'CES:Ply ISIO N . LIST OF SURROUNDING PRO• P• ER• TY OWNERS ;within 300 feet of the subject site PROJECT NAME: KEN W©t TH-J TI2MCK COMi pAN y R ik D L.A .6 Xigtiltic:4-4 APPLICATION NO: LUA.cti . Oeva. ,R..10 The following is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. The Development Services Division will notify these individuals of the proposed development. 082305-9109-01 135230-0220-00 STATE OF WASHINGTON 667777 RUSSO JAMES J+.EDNA 829999 350 GARDEN AVE N RENTON WA 98055 082305-9129-07 135230-0225-05 LILLEGARD LEONARD M 553628 VAN DYKE JERRY+KELLY 879999 LILLEGARD DOROTHEA 346 GARDEN AVE N 73-900 GRAPEVINE ST RENTON WA 98055 PALM DESERT CA 92260 082305-9148-04 135230-0235-03 STATE OF WASHINGTON 667777 FETTEROLF DAVID W 829999 • 338 GARDEN AVE N RENTON WA 98055 082305-9164-03 135230-0240-06 BERGER CHRIS PEMARLENE 180634 JACOBSON COLLEEN B 739999 EBERGER CHRISTOPHER JECASEY L 336 GARDEN AVE N 410 SUNSET BLVD N RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 082305-9165-02 135230-0245-01 THE BOEING COMPANY 650035 BRYANT MABLE 299999 PO BOX 3703 M/S f11F-09 334 GARDEN AVE N SEATTLE WA 98124 RENTON WA 98055 082305-9176-09 135230-0295-00 PUGET SOUND ENERGY/ELEC 790503 HENDERSON CORRINE E ET AL 669999 PROPERTY TAX DEPT 359 MEADOW AVE N PO BOX 90868 RENTON WA 98055 BELLEVUE WA 98009 082305-9197-04 135230-0300-03 PACCAR INC SEE DICK 431759 1400 4TH AVE N 1276 MARINE VIEW OR RENTON WA 98055 ANACORTES WA 98221 135230-0215-07 135230-0310-01 GOETZ MATTHEW M 159999 ONOFERSON RONALD J 5D9999 356 GARDEN AV N 10653 CARNELL AVE S RENTON WA 98055 SEATTLE WA 98178 135230-0315-06 135230-0610-08 ' P.IEPER EARL R E FRANCES GARDNER RO- -- D L 329999 • 345 'MEADOW AVE N 337 FACTOR VE N RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 135230-0320-09 135230-1185-01 THOMAS VERNIE E CHO GYU DONG 859999 341 MEADOW AVE N 1600 148TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98055 BELLEVUE WA 98007 135230-0325-04 135230-1205-07 BARRETT JOHN M 231775 SEATTLE OPERA ASSOCIATION 969999 339 MEADOW AVE N P 0 BOX 9248 RENTON WA 98055 SEATTLE WA 98109 135230-0510-09 135230-1225-03 BACKMAN ERIK E+BIRGITTA E 009999 FRANCIS AND BUTTNICK LLC 779999 14408 SE MAY VALLEY RD 204 1ST AVE S RENTON WA 98059 SEATTLE WA 98104 135230-0520-07 135230-1245-09 ROLLER ROBERT L 669999 HALDENBURGER FRIEDEL C104 350 MEADOW AVE N 345 N 3RD PL RENTON WA 98155 RENTON WA 98055 135230-0525-02 135230-1265-04 LOBBEREGT FRANKIE L 699999 TONDA ERNEST J 250809 344 MEADOW AVE N . 528 EDMONDS AVE NE RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98056 135230-0530-05 135230-1275-02 MALESIS ENTERPRISES 871996 TONDA ERNEST J 250809 12865 SE 223RD PL 528 EDMONDS AVE NE KENT WA 98031 RENTON WA 98056 135230-0535-00 135230-1285-00 ROBERTS PETER+MARIAN+ROLLER519999 TERRY JOHN & ELIZASETH 336 MEADOW AVENUE NORTH 1532 •.MARION AVE RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 135230-0585-09 135230-1295-08 BACKMAN ERIK PEHR EBENHARD+78C008 FAKHARZADEH M HADI 660758 14408 SE MAY VALLEY RD PO BOX 78404 NEWCASTLE WA 98059 SEATTLE WA 98178 135230-0595-07 135230-1300-01 MUNSON RONALD W+ELIZABETH A569999 CITY OF RENTON 209700 8648 S 134TH ST 200 MILL AVE SOUTH SEATTLE WA 98178 RENTON WA 98055 135230-0605-05 172305-9111-06 MCCORMICK HUGH M+DELORES M 759999 ALMONT GARRETT L 739999 343 FACTORY AVE N 10113 4I6TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98055 NORTH PEND WA 98045 -172305-9122-03 756460-0055—n4 . TING CHAO—TSAN+MEI HWA 651183 THE BOEINC JMPANY 650035 13219 NE 10TH PL PO BOX 370J M/S u1F-09 BELLEVUE WA 98005 SEATTLE WA 98124 172305-9150-08 756460-0095-06 KING KENNETH 2.73875 WIEMEYER CHARLES A II 809999 350 SUNSET BLVD N 3605 334TH AVE S RENTON WA 98055 SEATTLE WA 98144 722300-0105-00 756460-0105-04 THE BOEING COMPANY 650035 RENTON SCHOOL DIST 403 712777 PO BOX 3703 M/S 41F-09 435 MAIN AVE S SEATTLE WA 98124 RENTON WA 98055 722300-0115-08 756460-0170-04 THE BOEING COMPANY 650035 RENTON SCHOOL DIST 403 712777 PO BOX 3703 M/S 41F-09 435 MAIN AVE S SEATTLE WA 98124 RENTON WA 98055 Applicant Certification I, JAN A. i3R AL-- , hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property (Print Name) owners and their addresses were obtained from: ❑ C,ity of Renton Technical Services Records - ❑ Title Company Records King County Assessors Records Signe Date a<//2 / cf . A licant ( rr ) No-r-401. F ATTESTED: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Nora P' icc, i�it"• qi fob, he State of Washington, residing at Sc.a=e. �� on till yp r "�11.<..:,�� , 19 57. Signed � _ '•.N� PUBLIC moo.O _ A (Notary Public) i,, •i',i,/ g2�.�'1��.` ,,1,t 0p WIAs\,�,,,�.� "'"For City of Renton-J�'�'`"�`�'�� CERTIFICATION OF MAILING • I, SOAck t. • $ccne.r, hereby certify that notices of the proposed application were mailed to (City Employee) each listed property owner on t,J.,.i 2 i (419 I Signed 5&V\dV . 14• St•'s...ley— Date: .41 2 11°191 NOTARY AITFST: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Pub .c, in and for the State of Washington residing at ca-,ri.4-8. on the 1Cl `h- day of �t_. _/ '.-`,._': >t__1; .5: „� Y, } «,i .. • t„-,:vivHEFF I' r � � NOTARY PUBLIC h Signed rYz-h,4 STATE or WAS!IINCTON ` lislprop.doc MARILYN HEFF COMMISSION EXPIRES REV 07/98 MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES:6-29.03 , JUNE 29, 2003 2 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public WorKs ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: stiliatel Loo_steuNcur, COMMENTS DUE: JULY 16, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-098,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 1, 1999 GIiYOr APPLICANT: Kenworth Truck Company PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen PROJECT TITLE: Kenworth Research Lab WORK ORDER NO: 78557 LOCATION: 790 Garden Avenue North SITE AREA: 95,334 sq.ft. (2.18 acres) I BUILDING AREA(gross): 16,062 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to expand the existing Kenworth Truck Company research and development lab. Two areas of the existing building would be expanded: a 60-foot by 60-foot first floor addition to the South and a 20-foot by 60-foot first and second floor expansion along the Northeast elevation. The total area of the building expansion would be 6,000 sq.ft. The total building area would be 16,000 sq.ft. There are 13 existing parking spaces and the applicant would add two spaces. Existing access to the site would be unchanged. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare • Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals _ Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS k)v C. ►M kit ti We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. k''eL( 1(4- -/6/Q9 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date devapp Rev.10193 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public WorKs ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:— port-.ah i:NI COMMENTS DUE: JULY 16, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-098,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 1, 1999 ..1+:19 t APPLICANT: Kenworth Truck Company PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen Cr , PROJECT TITLE: Kenworth Research Lab WORK ORDER NO: 78557 R1-1, LOCATION: 790 Garden Avenue North SITE AREA: 95,334 sq.ft. (2.18 acres) 1 BUILDING AREA(gross): 16,062 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to expand the existing Kenworth Truck Company research and development lab. Two areas of the existing building would be expanded: a 60-foot by 60-foot first floor addition to the South and a 20-foot by 60-foot first and second floor expansion along the Northeast elevation. The total area of the building expansion would be 6,000 sq.ft. The total building area would be 16,000 sq.ft. There are 13 existing parking spaces and the applicant would add two spaces. Existing access to the site would be unchanged. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing • Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Hlstorlc/Cuttural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS P - DL< E 11.1/ (II-ec /Is't 170 e +p/v ty? 7vi Cte►it vet ttot/ awytclPaitfc/ -fvriw► rke, pvcpoced. / 1 z..c Lio 7v -4 w i. l((uil�L(i ii ��.� ✓qNI ed t C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS I c) I v k 17 Vi<t epa We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. AJeJ((la -7/6 /qa Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date devapp Rex 1C193 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public WorKs ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: tat T VW\ Review- W61Zelc. COMMENTS DUE: JULY 16, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-098,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 1, 1999 APPLICANT: Kenworth Truck Company PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen en), OF PROJECT TITLE: Kenworth Research Lab WORK ORDER NO: 78557 ' REOnt LOCATION: 790 Garden Avenue North 4/4 - ; SITE AREA: 95,334 sq.ft. (2.18 acres) BUILDING AREA(gross): 16,062 sq,f••-• I/w(,, SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to expand the existing Kenworth Truck Company research and developilfe tl0p. Two areas of the existing building would be expanded: a 60-foot by 60-foot first floor addition to the South and a 20-foot by 60-fodtfirst,And second floor expansion along the Northeast elevation. The total area of the building expansion would be 6,000 sq.ft. The total building area would be 16,000 sq.ft. There are 13 existing parking spaces and the applicant would add two spaces. Existing access to the site would be unchanged. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS a wtwt - We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date devapp Re+.10/93 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ftvr. freU -iwv\ COMMENTS DUE: JULY 16, 1999-NTQN I APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-098,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 1, 1999 'F 1)CPT APPLICANT: Kenworth Truck Company PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen `'v� PROJECT TITLE: Kenworth Research Lab WORK ORDER NO: 78557 2 7999 LOCATION: 790 Garden Avenue North '-jC1 tit() SITE AREA: 95,334 sq.ft. (2.18 acres) BUILDING AREA(gross): 16,062 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to expand the existing Kenworth Truck Company research and development lab. Two areas of the existing building would be expanded: a 60-foot by 60-foot first floor addition to the South and a 20-foot by 60-foot first and second floor expansion along the Northeast elevation. The total area of the building expansion would be 6,000 sq.ft. The total building area would be 16,000 sq.ft. There are 13 existing parking spaces and the applicant would add two spaces. Existing access to the site would be unchanged. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element or the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water LightGlam Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet /Vcr . B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS -L7?---e- g---ciLadg v ��N - / 9`Ir We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to property assess this proposal. • ri a Date / Signature of Director or Authorized R p resent ai devapp Rev.10/93 • Y CITY OF RENTON °� FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU MEMORANDUM NrrO DATE: June 3, 1999 TO: Peter Rosen, Senior Planner FROM: Corey Thomas, Plans Review Inspector SUBJECT: Preliminary Comments for Kenworth Lab Expansion 1. The preliminary fire flow required is 1,750 gpm. Two fire hydrants are required. One fire hydrant is required within 150-feet of the proposed structure and one fire hydrant is required within 300-feet of the structure. 5-inch storz fittings are required on existing hydrants. 2. The fire mitigation fees are applicable at the rate of $0.52 per square foot of building: 4,883 square feet x $0.52 = $2,539.16 This fee is payable at the time of building permit issuance. 3. An approved fire sprinkler system is required to be installed throughout the structure. The proposed addition is not allowed to be built over the existing fire sprinkler supply main. CT:ct kenlab City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: AWrov 1 COMMENTS DUE: JULY 16, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-098,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 1, 1999 APPLICANT: Kenworth Truck Company PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen PROJECT TITLE: Kenworth Research Lab WORK ORDER NO: 78557 LOCATION: 790 Garden Avenue North SITE AREA: 95,334 sq.ft. (2.18 acres) I BUILDING AREA(gross): 16,062 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to expand the existing Kenworth Truck Company research and development lab. Two areas of the existing building would be expanded: a 60-foot by 60-foot first floor addition to the South and a 20-foot by 60-foot first and second floor expansion along the Northeast elevation. The total area of the building expansion would be 6,000 sq.ft. The total building area would be 16,000 sq.ft. There are 13 existing parking spaces and the applicant would add two spaces. Existing access to the site would be unchanged. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth ✓ Housing V Air V Aesthetics V Water ✓ Light/Glare Plants V Recreation v Land/Shoreline Use V Utilities y Animals V Transportation f Environmental Health V Public Services .,, Energy/ Historic/Cultural / / Natural Resources V Preservation I Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet None B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS None C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS The proposed building heights are indicated as 28' above present ground level . This will pose no problem to airport operations . We have reviewed this ap. cation with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where add al informati. p needed to properly assess this proposal.0 •el" JUlt'k /7 , ('u T Signatur of irector or Authorized Representative Date devapp Rev.10/93 ====-===-=== =-=__, - t , J_u w ' ___-====—_—====I I L..„1_ 9C.fl s,. - Lli `,�.!�I� , ,aii.T. 0 i....j ,, , . i-iHN__-___________ • ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: rs> ../j,..„„Lin.didici.mg , . 1 if ii ----::::::::::::2::::::::::::3-:::::::::_f_::::_::::::::::::::::::::::1_: . --------------- _-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_ wp„,....... r... rm. . 1 it .,„.......::::::::::::_y_:::::::::::::::::_::::::_1 11,1.4 i/14 IL :E i 7._.:___, , ... , ..„...::,-.::::::::::::::::::::::.. i ,.. i;iq;(-S4\ er * .: .61....ifir.::.:::Er.::.E.:::::::1:17:1:::::1:::::::"Ei:::::-4417:iLt_go/.14. 1 . . ! r-" A i * •V '4 \ ....LI r Aki I I ft. / OP -IN. ' " 1 ! L11. ill 0 -T.r...:':1117::::..--:::-.:Kli:-IE:17:-:..::::::E:r.::::.... "" =----1 rg3P/.7,..-irl*.1 1)*- , _....7.::EEE-E-1::::::::::::.:Iir / ' 1\4 4 I 4 4 h. I / ,N • l.0•• /1\--7.k'\ "t"\k' , , , i,,.. , .. .*_-_-E:_:_:::_::_:_:_::-:-::E=3:::::_:::::::::_::_::_:::_:_:_:::2::_:::____ .- ..." , '''.. ...)., _...... ___:-...]:::_::::_:_:::::::::::_::::_:_::::::=EE::::::::::;:::::-:::::::_:::•-iji. I 7 t 161 , 1 o ..-:-----__ 1111 _-:::_::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::- An.,_ ,1 pit -.,7 \ 4 ,,Ai tik: F4,-,-,y,' JA) ;:_tfiv:_-_,.....-....::::::.--"_,_:::::::_ J _:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::„::::::::::::::::::::-. .,..„„,„ , _ .. ,,, .:-::::::::::_, 0._:_:_,_:_,_:_:_:-._,_:_-_-___:_:_:_:_:_:_:_:_:_:__ „_:_:_:_,_,_:_:_:_:_,_:_,_,_,.......,_:_- ____, , ,AL_ A -_ %wimp', 6%2 -- - .._) -.to i _ _ ___ __X__ti=_YI_I_l! _ __ _ _ _ fi •i _it e j :::::::::::1-:::::::::::::--_-::::::::::::-:-::::::::::::::::::::::::::::-::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::-:-.:-:-:-:-:-:-: .1;:-=-.!-C1 Mikt, iat • 1 :::::::::::--_::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::_--:::::::E:E_:_:_:_:_:_:_:_:_:_:_:_:_x_:_:_:_:_:_:_:_:_:_:_:_:_:_x_:_:__ 7 ...- -..,,__.....4.31,j....wri 0\- ,= ,.: - 1‘ ---\1411:14-\--- . ma sit_ �.vE.:E:E:- :_:_::E..-.1::::::E::_::-:-::::E:3::::_:::_:::::::E:,__tit =-3 #Xy `. _'t} =_______ �ti.-.. ` Ir. i. R, tic ...vim.- --:::::::::::::::::-_-.46L---::::::::-:-:-.:-:.-.7-.:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-- -:::-:.-.7--7.-:-: , . IN i . Ts .:=.1. I I' 61784.-imott 7a_ I, LEL ' 1.-.}." ....,,4.44,444..44:-,7:::::::::::::::::_"::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::-..:::::::'Tr:::::::::::::: ''.. h kill 11 I Ilf I/mi-, l'''',_Illi, i..... ...... .1 _ t'..1 7 frzy ,441 P3"..4 , i r,<-1 (--' 7.\. --::::::::-::::::E:---:::-:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::_tE:Ea .:::::::::•::::::3-E::::::: riiplo 'I, 1 'I . ..., ilt!Iii ;1-Trinimillan ''•* --1 repp.---= 6 il P -1 : T-PAti' VOiL:::EE-1:E--:-.}::::::_::-::::::::::::::.-:::::-:::::::.f:E-::EF:17-::::}.-:_EE_E:-E:_:-:E.::::::::}:::0; \ "CI iti t __14 1.! 'e )714111!'__ A-1N tl ., if . r I 1''- _ imp,. Dr. ..",.----::::::,__-_-::::".::::„-E-:::_.__,E::E_E__E_E_E_,.-E-E"-,7,-_ . A. ,,,,,„.L.,x,,,, j,:_, ... : ,,,,r,4E, , „ ... , _ .. ,,,,, ji 0E100/0 Nu -,,iii m =I-, .-:-:,.......::-,;:i-- tkiiim 0&Ng II:ILIKIIIItui 0 li FEA, 1 T. .. �.. \to Nul r .._,_ l En °4 D.a I_ V • — , ..... .,..4Q.10-c-Ailiseing,,,n,, ,,,, . AI istuit I _ , ,.. ....z.J.! ,11; ' ;1 -t ,,, _ . i III ■ CD ma-Iii[II P ' 1 \ 4 e.24 I 1 -s wn � ooniiiri,;.,,--vri itV th I ... : \4 riatVg-ii2itto r n- -.,;c133.11m a ma s ,M- OHSVI! ;....,,, :‘,.: 1 i ri.2 ) k ''•101i0' I rp.W11:4 ... ill T u 11;ILA't4-ii--.-- ' t NEVI 1 ... orill-1 ,..., IIP I'll'ifil VA.'i fli irl iii, hi 0410!WIPP EV D gig MNM 11-10 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: pQ S COMMENTS DUE: JULY 16, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-098,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 1, 1999 APPLICANT: Kenworth Truck Company PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen PROJECT TITLE: Kenworth Research Lab WORK ORDER NO: 78557 LOCATION: 790 Garden Avenue North SITE AREA: 95,334 sq.ft. (2.18 acres) BUILDING AREA(gross): 16,062 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to expand the existing Kenworth Truck Company research and development lab. Two areas of the existing building would be expanded: a 60-foot by 60-foot first floor addition to the South and a 20-foot by 60-foot first and second floor expansion along the Northeast elevation. The total area of the building expansion would be 6,000 sq.ft. The total building area would be 16,000 sq.ft. There are 13 existing parking spaces and the applicant would add two spaces. Existing access to the site would be unchanged. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet - B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS 1.6 C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS 746 We have reviewed this application with pa ' ular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information' -eeded t pro rly assess this proposal._, ignature of Director or Author d presentative Date devapp Re+.10/93 I City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: .„0('' uchcin Sewices COMMENTS DUE: JULY 16, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-098,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 1, 1999 APPLICANT: Kenworth Truck Company PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen PROJECT TITLE: Kenworth Research Lab WORK ORDER NO: 78557 LOCATION: 790 Garden Avenue North SITE AREA: 95,334 sq.ft. (2.18 acres) BUILDING AREA(gross): 16,062 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to expand the existing Kenworth Truck Company research and development lab. Two areas of the existing building would be expanded: a 60-foot by 60-foot first floor addition to the South and a 20-foot by 60-foot first and second floor expansion along the Northeast elevation. The total area of the building expansion would be 6,000 sq.ft. The total building area would be 16,000 sq.ft. There are 13 existing parking spaces and the applicant would add two spaces. Existing access to the site would be unchanged. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air _ Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health _ Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS .L 4 f / � )L-LC)c-o) R?CU L+7 r✓ a n-0 1tf So � C r �""% , -t We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed (tt to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date devapp Rev 10/93 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: I'oitce. COMMENTS DUE: JULY 16, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-098,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 1, 1999 APPLICANT: Kenworth Truck Company PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen PROJECT TITLE: Kenworth Research Lab WORK ORDER NO: 78557 LOCATION: 790 Garden Avenue North SITE AREA: 95,334 sq.ft. (2.18 acres) I BUILDING AREA(gross): 16,062 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to expand the existing Kenworth Truck Company research and development lab. Two areas of the existing building would be expanded: a 60-foot by 60-foot first floor addition to the South and a 20-foot by 60-foot first and second floor expansion along the Northeast elevation. The total area of the building expansion would be 6,000 sq.ft. The total building area would be 16,000 sq.ft. There are 13 existing parking spaces and the applicant would add two spaces. Existing access to the site would be unchanged. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet .3\ CA C acid -Vco ��E c� iv .. •0,n \ ccnfiA le B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. �i. bnc v Signature of Director OrJthorized Representative Date devapp Rev.+.3/93 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: • C.t)www.c.. .0elcevWf(1OMMENTS DUE: JULY 16, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-098,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 1, 1999 APPLICANT: Kenworth Truck Company PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen PROJECT TITLE: Kenworth Research Lab WORK ORDER NO: 78557 LOCATION: 790 Garden Avenue North SITE AREA: 95,334 sq.ft. (2.18 acres) I BUILDING AREA(gross): 16,062 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to expand the existing Kenworth Truck Company research and development lab. Two areas of the existing building would be expanded: a 60-foot by 60-foot first floor addition to the South and a 20-foot by 60-foot first and second floor expansion along the Northeast elevation. The total area of the building expansion would be 6,000 sq.ft. The total building area would be 16,000 sq.ft. There are 13 existing parking spaces and the applicant would add two spaces. Existing access to the site would be unchanged. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water _ Light/Glare Plants _ Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS (7O LY i 55 u 5-r TL C- e ua"v ry i nlZ-- - Ott 1 yN?3-GcM ertPth`i pinery-7 , e7+-I!"�j 0 ti s I r\f T Cr Govv„Paces c'hr51 C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional-Wocnaa'on Is needed to properly assess this proposal. t,$ 1.411 � 7/90�� Signature of i ector or A orized Representative Date devapp Rev.10/93 CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: U'1'C •♦ Analytical process Project consistency refers to whether a project is consistent with adopted and applicable development regulations,or In ♦ c ♦ their absence,comprehensive plan policies.RCW 36.7013.110 2 include a statement of the (s consistency provdes that the Notice f l rid use.lev l of preliminary determination o(e t if on sasbm with the type of land use,level of development infrastructure,and character of development if one has been made at the time of notice.At a minimum, every NOA shall include a determination of the projects consistency with the zoning,comprehensive plan and development regulations. NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF Land Use: The subject site Is located In the Heavy Industrial(IH)zone.Transportation NON-SIGNIFICANCE MITIGATED DNS-M equipment manufacturing and assembly is allowed as a primary permitted use in ` , the IH zone.The proposal appears to comply with the development standards of the IH zone. Development Regulations DATE: JULY 1,1999, Used For Project Mitigation: The proposal will be subject to the City's Environmental Ordinance,Zoning Code LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-98-08e,ECF regulations, Public Works Standard's,Uniform Building Code. Uniform Fire Code,etc. These adopted codes and standards will function to mitigate project APPLICATION NAME: KENWORTH RESEARCH LAB Impacts. Proposed Mitigation Measures: The folios owing address Mitigation Measures will likely be Imposed on the proposed project These recommended Mitigation PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Proposal to expend the existing Kenworth Truck Company research and M development lab. Two areas of the existing building would be expanded:a 60-loot by 80.foot first floor addition to meproject impacts not covered by existing codes and regulations as cited above. south and a 20-foot by 80-foot first and second floor expansion along the northeast elevation. The total area of the building expansion would be 8.000 sq.I.The total building area would be 18.000 sq.ft. There are 13 existing parking 1.Fire Mitigation Fee-$0.52 per square foot of new construction. spaces and the applicant would add two spaces.Existing access to the site would be unchanged. 2.Tramc Mitigation Fee-975 per new average daily trip. PROJECT LOCATION: 790 Garden Avenue North Comments on the above application must be submitted In writing to Mr.Peter Rosen,Project Manager,Development OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICA ntal impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. abed this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail,contact Mr.Rosen at Therefore,as permitted undlikely the RCW 43.21C.110,the Clly of Renton Is using the Optional ONS(M)process to give (425)decision 19. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified notice that a DNS-M is likely to be Issued.Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are Integrated into of any decisi on this project. a single comment period.There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated(DNS-M).A 14-day appeal period will follow the Issuance of the DNS-M. CONTACT PERSON: PETER ROSEN(425)430-7219 PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: June 28,1998 I PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: July 1,1999 APPLICANT: Kenworth Truck Company,10630 NE 38°i Place, Kirkland,WA 98033;Mr.Richard Jordal;phone(425)828-5761 OWNER: Kenworth Truck Company Permits/Review Requested: SEPA Environmental Review Other Permits which may be required: Building and Construction Permits Requested Studies: Geotechnical Study - Location where application may _ be reviewed: Plannitg/Builtling/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, -- ' 1\9�ID 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 ` � 1 4 PUBLIC HEARING: Not required.Administrative review only. • ,) \ - moist pima,. f ;IL-=:IIa.-i' . 41► I SFr. •.. r!: f. p'- - 1 ._ kt -,��. {�( J�t�i41 ;.,..rrit Rw Wit. •Tx4 .is '',� i CERTIFICATION Poo,,,I, JCr , hereby certify that copies of the above document were posted by me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on ---'3`,gyp QJ d— ) l cl qc • ('1' --.*.-:)•----Signed: ATTEST: Subcribed and sworn before me, a Nortary Pu ic, in and for e State of Washington residing la y,., ,on the �[`t 2 day of MARILYN iC:-,MCHEFF )� f STATEO OFF WASHINGTON ���� COMMISSION EXPIRES MARILYN KAANCFiEFF - JUNE 20, 2003 MY APPOINtMENT EXPIRES:6-29413 Gsr'Y O� fiR NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE, MITIGATED (DNS-M) DATE: JULY 1,1999 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-99-098,ECF APPLICATION NAME: KENWORTH RESEARCH LAB PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Proposal to expand the existing Kenworth Truck Company research and development lab. Two areas of the existing building would be expanded: a 60-foot by 60-foot first floor addition to the south and a 20-foot by 60-foot first and second floor expansion along the northeast elevation. The total area of the building expansion would be 6,000 sq. ft. The total building area would be 16,000 sq. ft. There are 13 existing parking spaces and the applicant would add two spaces. Existing access to the site would be unchanged. PROJECT LOCATION: 790 Garden Avenue North • OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED(DNS-M): As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore, as permitted under the RCW 43.21 C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS(M)process to give notice that a DNS-M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated(DNS-M). A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: June 28, 1999 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: July 1, 1999 APPLICANT: Kenworth Truck Company, 10630 NE 38th Place, Kirkland,WA 98033;Mr.Richard Jordal; phone(425)828-5761 S(It+ OWNER: Kenworth Truck Company V Permits/Review Requested: SEPA Environmental Review Other Permits which may be required: Building and Construction Permits Requested Studies: Geotechnical Study Location where application may be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 PUBLIC HEARING: Not required. Administrative review only. genmalot CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Analytical process Project consistency refers to whether a project is consistent with adopted and applicable development regulations,or in their absence,comprehensive plan policies. RCW 36.708.110(2)(g) provides that the Notice of Application(NOA) include a statement of the preliminary determination of a project's consistency with the type of land use,level of development,infrastructure,and character of development if one has been made at the time of notice. At a minimum, every NOA shall include a determination of the project's consistency with the zoning, comprehensive plan and development regulations. Land Use: The subject site is located in the Heavy Industrial(IH)zone. Transportation equipment manufacturing and assembly is allowed as a primary permitted use in the IH zone. The proposal appears to comply with the development standards of the IH zone. Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: The proposal will be subject to the City's Environmental Ordinance,Zoning Code regulations, Public Works Standard's, Uniform Building Code, Uniform Fire Code, etc. These adopted codes and standards will function to mitigate project fir.: . impacts. . . Proposed Mitigation Measures: The following Mitigation Measures will likely be imposed on the proposed project. These recommended Mitigation Measures address project impacts not covered by existing codes and regulations as cited above. 1. Fire Mitigation Fee-$0.52 per square foot of new construction. • 2.Traffic Mitigation Fee-$75 per new average daily trip. Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Mr. Peter Rosen, Project Manager, Development Services Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055, by 5:00 PM on July 23, 1999. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact Mr. Rosen at (425)430-7219. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: PETER ROSEN (425)430-7219 PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION ____E-_L--H I---- '. V-... \ \Ai-, Itv,-.-.-ci 1. in 1......3 3\ .. \ 1 13, 4... \ \;\, .. . • - - 1. 1i.1. , gernabt gi { ,:. --.i '•;.- .!: (‘)/.. ' \ i f„,'., 5ft n. Wit. -- I IN I l k\ al rj'. .�. . 1 tie F fit'r�����`` � , S�I., P a CITY Ik.fiF RENTON tb :di Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator July 1, 1999 Mr. J. A. Bredal, A.I.A. Pacific Engineering Technologies, Inc. 1300 Dexter Avenue North, Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98109 SUBJECT: Kenworth Research Lab Project No. LUA-99-098,ECF Dear Mr. Bredal: The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on August 10, 1999. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. Please contact me, at (425) 430-7219, if you have any questions. Sincerely, Peter Rosen Project Manager cc: Kenworth Truck Company/Owners acceptance 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 :?::::::v:::::::::::::::::::::::::v?:::::::•:::::::..v:::::::::;}}??:•?}?:�:�:v}:�}?r:n)}:4', :::::::::::::::r.::::::::.}}}?:.;$:::::::.i}'ryy:»v:.Y::{.Y:::pi':.}.;,YY.,`. ::::.::.,:;t<::'.::•'...r..t...... .:,:::r:::::::.�: x:s%?>.a;;tt{. _.:. %::�,: .: ":-fk....r..., .......................................................... :.r. .... y ::/�;• ':' ..:r::, rk!::fr?:{�n:r.::v....s?r::ii}�:$:fXk::}'•..'::$$$::::$$::?.'•.'.cvY$::;:;:;<?,.`•s•:`s}:$;::;; ,--.<;-::.t..t.:.,{,.:.t-::.:t:{..,•::,�:.�:-.�:::::::::.:�::.:::�:..::�::::.�:.....,.::.::::.. ...<,t.:.r{.;y? ,1 b /� .0`.}�-p;�:;... .::rf-:::::,;..,f.i•:r?...f. ../•...;:.. t:.vf..::.o:::.,:....... 4...Y............. ..... c:r:;tt?•:{•.�......,..OLT::Y:�.�:•:L�IV��.I.�:.t,. ••.•<?t{•s:;•<•{tr. ..n.f... ,ttt...t..tt•.,t<{,t::,,•.::;:$:;:c:?:•o-i?%.iss;:.?}s;•sf•;?4.. ......,,.;. ........t.......v..................t.........: : ;;..:::.......t.. :..:.....:...t.........t.......r£t...:.:::::::::.................::::::...... • {.vL•:{n;:•}}-S'tit{:•}:ti•:4;•:4:�:ri:<:.?:;?? :.:::}:;.:i;.::•i$::�?:.::.:•.:.�:::.�:.:':::: .:,,.. .l..r.. .....};?n:4i:{•: ..:.......:.......................................... ...... ..... :: ...: ..: .. .. ... :. {;..;,}:...iv•. .t:.y:::::.v-:t}:{?4i:•i??':::::::::}i.?:::: •\}:{?{•Y:..,. vv\::f:v;:..v:. i'fhY+ff.{;}:.:41:'n.M.O..:<Y.: .:r/•r:vth+v'/::t :?:4vvv:.:.rr:}};r:.: �.ft.:,,,:•r.•:.::::....;•::r:.:::,::::::::.:.:.:.:...........::.:.:::::: ::::.:�::.�:::::::::....... r$•9.c':E2s. •:G.k}:r:?r??:{.:::.tfr,;yY.:..;>y Ri`}r: r:}}sas;::4;s>'s•{.Y::::.:n;;:a?:::fi ..:..:::....... ..... f�re:Y-Fl��f"4�tC�`R.I::Y�Gs{X���IIr.�':t•.!t�#.�71'•.�k`I%}t??:•::,•::: rS: t../...:tf:.: , {.;F ,< ....,.......................t.......,.......... .......................................'......., ::•::.......................:::::::::::::.:-:::::r::::::::,::::$-:?:::.f- .r:.:.}......:.r. .. ..}ri•.}.t: ................r..r.........................................................................:.......................................: .........v.n................ .,........... t...i:.x.. ,.......r.,t..vv..k'.r.:.. rr.k......n..::?.. ...t...... .......................... ...........r h.:r..t.......+.....r. ..........:..r..............u:nv::..r....r....x:::.....n........,}..:. .....v....,.....v .... }..rr.•.}i}'n;..{. .n...•v•.v?:::v.....................................................................................................................:.fi.....................n.�v.........rt...................t............r.........r................... ...........{.n.r. .... ... :... v:.Rt,•,..t•::.t•;:nv•.::v::.:k•:.v:.v::•:::.,•:;::::::.w::.v::::}::::::?::::;-??>: .. ........ t; ..{{...;;.}.....y..........{?••;:4},..:h q rr{F..}•;:rfF.vv,•.:G,'i.:r.}:4}iir?.J.:::vv.v. ... -..... ;.. ::. :: �!. };}•v. .:: .:7}f`/.•rvrw,f••} :tff v4f},. ..4}..:::::v;-.; .................... ..... .................................................... Y:. :j{ '.. :, ?:?•?: :'a .: ::i\Y.-}}:::}r}:w r:n•} t g ...Si. :� r.:::(��i.):;.yr .... , ....}.{. :: ?Y:h:�%S{: :.;/.,.::...... .+i'.: }Y'}.,.Y:}}tk t+•:..:...:.•:?::}..:?::r•::::a:;•::.:rw�..::::.;:{?�:a;:•a;:.:::?:•:.•::.::::.. ::: -:: .r: •?:, ::: :. '_.:; ..::,i? ..: .> :: ..: .:... ..t'.•:::.t•... ..G,'.�•-d:`...�::'`� rS:::Ysr....?::. .rf .a-.,?::" ..k:: r. ::•••:.:::..r:::.:::.�:::ss?;.:r>:•:sssss:�o-s:o->:o;:;>s::;::.:?:.>}: ?..r. :. .o} ::.. .... .. ...:.k:•. _-; ..? : •.:y.:{:art{... •>}Y::-:::.. ... t{.r.!+vp:n•:n::.�................... -: p.: ... ,: .:x: .,::?. .}h•}::::}n.:..^n:i' •xfr-: ..6.. .,ytitt.:.;?::::::•:::ti,...r.......:.::... .,r..}. ... :.r .La..• :.:G:. a:.a::.�:::':{.: .... ..........:.:::.:.:::::::::::;:::::::::::::.,:r::!lrr..:«r:.,:::r::s:.::..rrr r .r:....rr..r. ...r:rr:rrr........r........::•:....: .. .;?.:s. .t.-:.:.....,.....,-::::•::........�•:::.�::::::::::.:::::::::::::::...............::.........:.................................t.t........,.... t.t.........t..f:r..........................t...........,............r:..... :r....rr., .. ..:::...:::::::. ,:.;,..... .........:...................................:r...r.................................................................... f.......t..t...........t........t.....r....:L.r..r:.r.rr.r..r......... -::;:::0.:}?Y?Y:ii}}?i?:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.::::::::.�:::...::•::v::::::::::w.v}.v..v:vm•%^:O;?•}`• ......:vvv:nvv:::nv::::.v::::::::::nv:•• .........nnr.n,,, -...;................. x;:{;{ti::?(:{•}}'r':..r:.;..:.:v: ::itiJ'ry Y^??iii}}%:.?Yi'{,v?:?4Y}:?•}}}?%v;•}'•?}?y:•??v::•?'..::::.:::::::x::::.v::.v::::?.:.•::.::r.}iY.•}:¢?:::.v:::is{•??}•:::tv:::..v,.:•:ti?h:?{-Y4r:?{ti?4??:4:4?::}'F?::::w:.v::•:r::•: ::v.:.w:..:.n...f. ...:;...n..n...............r....r...r.:v.::.:.: .:r. :•:: w::. .:: . ..::v::;• .: .:. :. ..:. :... .n.,:...:::.........:v:r... .....:.....::......0...r..:..............nr...r..}.::•:::•::....,......:.. ... ... .... ..,..... n. .. :t. .: ...... :.. r,y:.... .}:•l�:t.•.}'}.'♦ '•:�✓�L'..r,,l.r.::'n::i:::.,}r'::;�::i':::$:$:'$:.:;$::: :•:'Lt•}:$.$:..'}v$,F,nr,t.:C.t.•�F,+f.::\?•.t: ,:.f,..:;f.:::vr:)+}:ri.^.....•;...... .... ....:...........t:.tw:x��:;�:•}:??.i?::.:. .?. ii ..{. ... .. {:••.:v: 'iti• -: .?:i: ...t�..r...r.\v::........:.:. :v.v.:.:f,•%•:tt}}'{?•}I?tivhv;,t•}r.;w:x::;.•;}::rr::r::.:rr:............ ... :. ... .:. ....: ;: .....�.r........ r....:..... ..... ...... :::. .::. ..: .. Y-.v :.: :: '. ... :v:. ' ,?: :. :•:v. ::: :: .�:. '. .:.::.}:•:f•S}:•:{::•:ti3}L}:•x:+ti.}:.tt${:.:ti{'•:•vv v::::v:{;...:::.••nvl:::. ::.{.:.xv;••:}}vriv:.iYYY}i}}:::.}:r: ;.•}:•}i;•i:4:•riri}::::: .J�.... .}.}:w•;.,)) .rk.v ,:ff..ri.:i:f..v:^::r.;:F':::rY.:::::. ♦..L..:.v.t.............::::$$:?{?;?{•Y}.n..... :+J,.. L:X•::rn.....f::;.:ti"-.: v}:4., r.f.... :•'.{:.ti•'•.t,7r...t.t•:::.}:: ..t..:FT ..4,•-.t•X r.Grt. . ::.v:4m::::L vw::::::.::;:•: :. .;..:.:. ::•} :�? i}}}: .. :. .:.. .:is :?:.}. .../.............+... t..ffr...i:J.i... .r$.}.?...n.LS.tt'.}i :::.vv::::?:..:........v.:vtnv?::�:{}:$$$:S<ii}:i$$S$�::::::i{:t;(:?::::$.......... .n � ..�.��. .C� �.�: :::w::w:f::•vY:;}::v:..}}.}v,{;{4:..}•.,r.r...��cc••.......r..$$Y:::::. ..............................t..........::•::::.v::::::::::::::::::::::::::;w::::.'.w:::::............................v.}...v..vt.'4 1.......t.................... Y... !.C\.........r .:v:::::::::••::•:::v::::;...::v::-..N:::::v::•:nv:v:•..r..::::r::::::.:.v:+.....:v.............::::••:::: ..............x::w::w:::::.v::n:v.:.rf.................................................::::::::::•::•::.v:::nv:::::nv:.nY�:.:..::::..::•..............t..l............ .. ... ............... ...n........... ...v. :!::•.?' :t?4ii:•:?:}:{??::is}:?.:?:•:is ii?i:?}:• '.::?i :•i:.r•: ;ii:}}}!{•}:itJ;t•Y:•?}}}}}}}:•r.�...$:}::•i:is .$'?:n:i::??i.i•?} ::.?»::.::::>::::>::.;:<>::>;..::::::.. .. ...PER'i'Y... .NER S :;:.:t.::t.$:t.}:.}$:?.}:.}:::$::.::.::.:,.::.;. :. OJECT..I v................:........ ......:.........:............:.:�.:t:...:.:...::::.�::::::.:�:..:::.�::::::::::.:::::::.::::�:.�:I.�:::,..v::::::..�::::::::::.:�:..... ............................:.::..::R..................:::..NFORMi47t.ON.::::.::::::::::::.: .....::::.:. Note 'If there 1s't Tote F rglt no Io of OW:flb leaao Mteeh oti.ddibotlei notanzbd M6ster.fkpplica4iorr<fof.eacFt'ownar...;: PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: NAME: Kenworth Truck Company Kenworth Truck Company Research and Development Laboratory PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION: • ADDRESS: 10630 N.E. 38th Place 790 Garden Avenue North Renton, Washington 98055 KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): CITY: Kirkland ZIP: 98033 722300 - 00100 - 04 TELEPHONE NUMBER: 425 - 828-5761 EXISTING LAND USE(S): .::: :::..:::. H-1 Heavy Industrial APPLICANT (if other than oer} > €wn PROPOSED LAND USES: NAME: Richard R. Jordal H-1 Heavy Industrial COMPANY(if applicable): Kenworth Truck Company EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: H-1 Heavy Industrial ADDRESS: 10630 N.E. 38th Place PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): H-1 Heavy Industrial CITY: Kirkland ZIP: 98033 EXISTING ZONING: . H-1 ,• TELEPHONE NUMBER: 425 - 828-5761 PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): COIUI`ACT fiEkSON ..... H-1 . . . . .......... .. ................ . .... ... ....... SITE AREA (SQ. FT. OR ACR:!:JLOPMENT PLANNING NAME: J. A. Breda!, A.I.A., Associate Architect 95334 square feet CITY OF RENTON JUN2d1999 COMPANY(if applicable): Pacific Engineering PROJECT VALUE: RECEIVED Technologies, Inc. $210,000.00 ADDRESS: 1 300 Dexter Ave. N., Suite 100 IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? No. CITY: Seattle ZIP: 98109 IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA? NO. TELEPHONE NUMBER: 206 — 281-7500 See attached. • • • a that:a l: . � taffi.w !'. ermr _ANNEXATION $ SUBDIVISION: COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT $ REZONE $ _ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ _ SPECIAL PERMIT $ _ SHORT PLAT $ _TEMPORARY PERMIT $, TENTATIVE PLAT $ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ PRELIMINARY PLAT $ SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ _ FINAL PLAT $ _ GRADE & FILL PERMIT $ (NO. CU. YDS: ) PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ _ VARIANCE $ (FROM SECTION: ) _ PRELIMINARY _ WAIVER $ FINAL WETLAND PERMIT $ _ ROUTINE VEGETATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ BINDING SITE PLAN $ SHORELINE REVIEWS: _ SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ _ CONDITIONAL USE $ VARIANCE $ /� EXEMPTION $No Charge i ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ tOO®.. 00 REVISION $ t AF IDAVIT. F OWNERSHIP....:.. :. I, (Print Name) U•A. k2b3L , declare•that I am (please check one)_the owner of the property involved in this application,Xthe authorized representative to act for the property owner (please attach proof of authorization), and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained end the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. , „tnnr►,,,, • J.A t�f/z�n� �� •;gStaN¢ Q'f ,��Subscribed and swornto before e, a Notary Public, in and �4Jrlli for' a Staff of k) j) 0 I esidin at (Name of Owner/Representative) NOTARY _ on the-2 t' day of N�o o' 19 Q�• Sign ure of Owner/Representative) cn PUBLIC',�i�`�!i?BEti�Z��C?�.` Qi�NA•c.l8ra`ate of N ary Public) (This section to.be'completed by City Staff.) City File::Number ,� ` ? A AAD BSP CAPS CAP U CPA CU A CU H LLA MHP IFPUD. :'FP:PP!iR >RVMP <SA A' SA H ::SHPL-A SHPLH ;:SP::.SM SMh TP,.: V-A' V-B V-Fi : V�' TOTAL•:FEES: $. 7`e y ., TOTAL POSTAGE PROVIDED MASTERAP.DOC REVISED 8/97 Kenworth Truck Company .. Environmental Review for Project Actions Narrative Page 3 LEGAL DESCRIPTION. PARCEL D - A strip of land 60 feet wide over and across the northwest quarter of the southeast quarter and the southwest quarter of the southeast quarter in Scction 8,Township 23 North,Range 5 East,W.M.,in King County,Washington, extending from the south line of North Eighth Strect(formerly Graham Street), and having a width of 30 feet on each side of and measured at right angles from the following described centerline: Beginning at the northwest corner of the southeast quarter of said Section 8, the north line of said southeast quarter also being the north line of North eighth Stree((formcrly\Vashington Avenue);thence S89°28'19"E along the north line of North Eighth Strcet(formerly Washington Avenue),a distance of 423.54 feet,thence S18°01'34"E,a distance of 63.28 feet to the south line of North Eighth Street(formerly Washington Avenue),the true point of beginning of this description. thence continuing S18°01'34"E,a distance of 72.26 feet to a beginning of curve; thence southerly along a uniform curve to the right,having a radius of 573.69, through a total angle of 19°01',a distance of 190.17 feet to the end of the curve; thence SO°59'26"W,a distance a 1,621.58 feet to a beginning of curve; thence southwesterly along a uniform curve to the right,having a radius of 819.02 feet,through a total angle of 22°50',a distance of 326.19 feet to the end of the curve; thence S23°49'26"W,a distance of 404.65 feet to a point on the north line of North Fourth Street(formerly Graham Street),which is 30 feet southeasterly, measured at right angles,from the southeasterly line of Block 13 of Car Works Addition to Renton; EXCEPT that portion(hereof lying northerly of the following described line: Beginning at the intersection of the centerline of Houser Way North(formerly Railroad Avenue),with the easterly production of the southerly margin of North Eighth Strect(formerly\Vashington Avenue);thence S18°01'34"E along said centerline,a distance of 72.25 feet to the point of a curve to the right,with a radius of 573.69 feet; - thence continuing southeasterly along the arc of a curve to the right,having a radius of 573.69 feet,an arc length of 190.71 feet to the point of tangency of said curve; thence N89°00'54"W,a distance of 30 feet to the westerly margin of Ilouscr Way North(formerly Railroad Avenue); thence northerly along the westerly margin of Houser Way North(formerly Railroad Avenue),a distance of 1.25 feet to a point on the arc of a curve to the right,having a radius of 691.78 feet,an arc distance of 102.18 feet easterly from the beginning of said curve,the true point of beginning of said line; thence continuing southeasterly along the arc of said curve,a distance of 77.94 feet to the easterly margin of said Houser Way North(forincrly Railroad Avenue),the terminiation of said line; AND EXCEPT the cast 10.00 feet of the south 395 feet thereof; Situate in the City of Renton,County of King,State of Washington. Containing approximately 135,579 square feet or 3.112 acres,more or less. TCITY OF RENTON - ENVIRONA...dTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Renton-Kenworth R&D Building Expansion Project 2. Name of applicant: Mr. Richard R. Jordal, Manufacturing Project Manager Kenworth Truck Company 10630 N.E. 38th Place Kirkland,Washington 98033 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: PACIFIC ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 1300 Dexter Avenue North, Suite 100 Seattle,Washington 98109 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING (206) 281-7500 CITY OF RENTON Contact: Mr. J. A. Breda!, A.I.A.,Associate Architect JUN 2 8 1999 4. Date checklist prepared: RECEIVED June 15, 1999 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton, Department of Planning/Building/Public Works- Development Services Division 6. Proposed timing or schedule(including phasing, if applicable): Construction would begin in the Fall of 1999 and would be completed by May 1, 2000. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. None are anticipated. 1 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLIC. f: 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Stipulation to Amend Consent Decree (08/19/94) Determination of Non significance,Amendment of Consent Decree for Paccar Remedial Action (07/27/94) Final Cleanup Action Plan and Consent Decree (11/8/91) Determination of Non significance, Paccar Remedial Action (06-13-91) Environmental Checklist (05/13/99) Feasibility Study (02/23/90) Remedial Investigation & previous site studies listed therein (09/01/89) Design Engineering Reports, Phases I-V Cleanup Construction Plans & Specifications, Phases I-V 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No applications are pending. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Building, Electrical, Mechanical and Plumbing permit from City of Renton 11. Give a brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the site of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) This proposal would cover the construction of a 40'x60' pre-fabricated metal building addition to the south side of the existing structure, and in architectural harmony with the existing construction. Two sets of rolling steel doors would be located on the ends of the addition for tractor/trailer access to the new area. The concrete floor would be supported on pilings or spread footings. This building is used by Kenworth to build and store prototype models of new products. The site will not be enlarged. Historically, this area has been a fenced and separate operation from the rest of the Paccar property. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. See attached Legal Description 2 Kenworth Truck Company Environmental Review for Project Actions Narrative Page 3 LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL D A strip of land 60 feet wide over and across the northwest quarter of the southeast quarter and the southwest quarter of the southeast quarter in Section 8,Township 23 North,Range 5 East,W.M.,in King County,Washington, extending from the south line of North Eighth Street(formerly Graham Street), and having a width of 30 feet on each side of and measured at right angles from the following described centerline: Beginning at the northwest corner of the southeast quarter of said Section 8, the north line of said southeast quarter also being the north line of North eighth Street(formerly Washington Avenue);thence S89°28'19"E along the north line of North Eighth Street(formerly Washington Avenue),a distance of 423.54 feet,thence S18°01'34"E,a distance of 63.28 feet to the south line of North Eighth Strect(formerly Washington Avenue),the true point of beginning of this description. thence continuing S18°01'34"E,a distance of 72.26 feet to a beginning of curve; thence southerly along a uniform curve to the right,having a radius of 573.69, through a total angle of 19°01',a distance of 190.17 feet to the end of the curve; thence SO°59'26"W,a distance a 1,621.58 feet to a beginning of curve; thence southwesterly along a uniform curve to the right,having a radius of 819.02 feet,through a total angle of 22°50',a distance of 326.19 feet to the end of the curve; thence S23°49'26"W,a distance of 404.65 feet to a point on the north line of North Fourth Street(formerly Graham Street),which is 30 feet southeasterly, measured at right angles,from the southeasterly line of Block 13 of Car Works Addition to Renton; EXCEPT that portion thereof lying northerly of the following described line: Beginning at the intersection of the centerline of Houser Way North(formerly Railroad Avenue),with the easterly production of the southerly margin of North Eighth Street(formerly Washington Avenue);thence S18°01'34"E along said centerline,a distance of 72.25 feet to the point of a curve to the right,with a radius of 573.69 feet; thence continuing southeasterly along the arc of a curve to the right,having a radius of 573.69 feet,an arc length of 190.71 feet to the point of tangency of said curve; thence N89°00'54"W,a distance of 30 feet to the westerly margin of Houser Way North(formerly Railroad Avenue); thence northerly along the westerly margin of Houser Way North(formcrly Railroad Avenue),a distance of 1.25 feet to a point on the arc of a curve to the right,having a radius of 691.78 feet,an arc distance of 102.18 feet easterly from the beginning of said curve,the true point of beginning of said line; thence continuing southeasterly along the arc of said curve,a distance of 77.94 feet to the easterly margin of said Houser Way North(formerly Railroad Avenue),the terminiation of said line; AND EXCEPT the east 10.00 feet of the south 395 feet thereof; Situate in the City of Renton,County of King,State of Washington. Containing approximately 135,579 square feet or 3.112 acres,more or less. ©1997 Thomas Bros.Maps •,••,..•f••Y:.Y:•:•::•:•<•:::: :: ':}'�,.°,' ' may\ 7� .. } ?�:k ii •o i ?z>?>?>`; to tit Iv iv 'iq';::; :;? >m .,2to �' 'am-- ::• :!r ;;: :• ti.•• ., ? = ,,z;< t g car, k, #� z^3 cu ik'i i,i a ��/� ,,,1:01.14: _rro CD �if.;tk•`.k:i ::;}•. �{g (Fj ii �/1 y,{ v,(� _k f/} 'y� h y O ......... .Mffiw:. .•$i• :•;Y:;;%<' P7 w` ....°�7` tfo�a::�.. ...........::<`Y"'•,N�r)' .?� y^'`•' •:is . . ..:. .. o ii> >:<:«::::}:..: ..:.: ..:: «::»»:} : :::;::.. .};:.;:.:.}:.:.:: :.::.}:;.::.}:.}::.:;..;:.}::k. ::..::; Ni a $7 TN ::.}:•::•:}. .;96 :•:::,e F::��'::S:Y• alb � •:::i::}:;}}•:.. •�373i:�:<;:;::{:•':: 1u'Td ^^--••r iiii01 pi �::{.}•. •':' : .> ':',, ...71:.. ...... .::: : ' •"fie `'l�t E:: :::'�� :::::... ... cp ::::......:.::.... ... �. 3u 13 �.�r":>����' � rat><:>::>><>::; � w::�'�;?�•L,, 03 n.J; i i::i:::• .:� W`.....:::::tip:YY:{•}:•}`�. . x.:::• :•i": ::•i:J:'.. .i:' ...:::.... v}:•Y}:�}:.}}}:{{{::.:. -., 4k{\� �}ti\\4V:'`' Y irii :::;:;;:; :: r:::: . :: `l: \t•.'`:{;J:•:t,. ':% 4 ... ':`C, \:\.uti\:,y.a•v {}. N ,•,�i. •:.::•:::i:a::::kk:;::::::::::: `•:::.::: . •• a�::::"1. , {.;: '•4\Q \ ,,:.•.•:?::'�k:. .v\.. J4.,.Ja,b"::;iii :,w{'•,i'M1 \..,b �'•Y �'ti}.:tti\}:•}'v'::C`:ii:�:4,:;};Y:.j•} k\v.:.Yk .Yb. v. k. ::v•• ::::::.v :: �'�/ :::. '"%.,K;}:;,v.:.nv".}}}}}4\:'t\\{.Y\•}\•k{....v.•............"v. ::ad...v\.... :''v'•S i'Ji:k:Fj}:{: ;ti'?::i k:i:Y�'.�'�:i::•:-ii:' . . :i •:;:.;..i:?::;:. :iiiiiii i i:;:?k:ii;::4;:iS�':%:>iiii::::ii:n 03 it ...x.;r.., ::: x .:v::4}\•':i ti.:4' �vY"'k:}i'ti ........ 4M.....,.}}:::�� kk::•:i}kk: � •::,k�••.,�..:{•../{,1;:'.}}+"'' {:;:i;: ':"'}:•Y,;:;: {.}:•. ,\ . 4 va:-v}ti vw.\\.\:t�>iii:ti'iivY,u\:\•.J;... `.•..�� zatio :: ::: , :J:Ja{•Y :?: ::.y::::::::::.:y::: :.is'ti•i:{.;: :. :. .................. • I ..::::.... �y¢�p�� • •4 iii1>:'^•^E00 �`,` :AR'i.. 01> y: x :%rf ;''}:•r:<v is i::{Y: L .. ��ylrx L. :.}:� •.v?4 IDS� ,,yy�� :.::%ti a (k .. 0.�... •:• ::(}. �!!: ... .... {,,{fi�ee :::,::11::.,:.t:::....... �': :i.'•' :ii>}�\}: : .' ;'may[. � 7:Fiii iiY:iiii:•iiiii is:::i:. �,: .'i}Y}}:•::::.::':'i. •::::?'•:'i: � ♦ � ... :::i)i:i:::i:'fii.......,, .. •::i:i::i::i :':i: :i::i.:is::'{.i:'iY:: :: iiiiiiiiiii �:;:... ..: o ..• .:.. ..} �i.Ir;;: +"` .'.''.''"�"n`�{';�. "' ' ::..:...{;:.. ':::;:.:.::.}. ::::. �. :.i:•}::{%.:..::i:ii::::;:::: i:i'::::9:ii:2:::i::iY:;;i ..;:i :. .: ::: :.�. .:. .:.:''::::i: :<::<:::i::i•:i::>::ii::iiii:iii:: :ti::::;:>::::::>::::::>::>::::: �:;i: >:;>}...:.;:i:.: �� lt4s41. =t; :�.�..aii:° .x :'•i%�� <.�:.'i<i '888��P'ER3'E40.�PlNBQ'.:.,y'.: i �> ,.x: x.. �` ::9 .. F' s �} :.:i:::i:ii::i::::: :::;is ..pyll'• Ff :\ {2 '3:;;::;;:::::i:%'ii:'<i:?":`'';:i:%.::':''.'::'rii:'ii:`•#i".<::{.' " '::i:%•`:•`::iS;;;%%#�%:�':: t�:� .. V :::i is%.:':" ...•': i:: :i':::'i!:1...i..:. ::i;:::i::'::::':::: .. . .:: .:. :.::.: .::::: :.... \„ 4,kv • '4 stk ........:..:. \k. \ ,„, , '��` Wiz':::;. > ... � •�Y : ikN,.� i S •. k i:i: rw ' MM v sk:�.\ Q, IiS •s. • q�`�,�g •{•istiJ:4 }::i:•i:J:J:J:•}:{:::ti^:{: C:•. :•:::::.{: ::i'::i:Y:iiii:': Nip kk� ti+" `�ti+vv ..::::..::.. • vv„vv,\\v, [• �>� . ::.:: iiiii;y Itia;ip x� t F,::.:';';;'i' ::.: ii�jy::v: �YY, • 4iJ �(pp�� :{ At 1 Jir :•• t •••14..:"': :i;.ii*Ak'''''"iri.•1;11.:::::;i:••;H•:.::'••• 2+� Z p., • —'--'::H7'W1,10! Al LA �t. }}�� : .':y.i;;•••� ii tea,. ...... • ' J 9 M :::is ::::�::.;�:::.:::•::::�:.�::;.:ow .„ .......... W ..-i TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLIC__ f: B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site(circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other: Generally flat with the exception that the North 25% of the R&D site along N.85th St. is raised approximately 3' above the rest of the property. (see the attached TOPOGRAPHICAL survey of the property for details). b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? There is a ramp on the East side of the property that allows access to the higher elevation along N. 85th St. (see attached TOPOGRAPHICAL survey of the property). c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Gravel, sand, clay, peat and fill. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. None. f Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Site is currently paved and erosion is highly unlikely. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction(for example, asphalt or buildings)? The entire site is currently covered with concrete or asphalt with the exception of 2 planter areas. The building addition will replace current asphalt pavement. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any. See response B.1.f 3 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLIC__.T: 2. Air a. What type of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Dust may be generated during excavation, but amounts will be minimized by special construction practices in compliance with the Health and Safety Plan. There will be some vehicle emissions from excavation equipment and trucks used for hauling. Air monitoring will occur in compliance with the Health and Safety Plan and Cleanup Action Plan. Occasional automobile and diesel truck emissions will be generated during operation of the facility. The levels of emission will not change with completion of the project and will be far below state levels. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. None known. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any. Sprinkle or water down site during construction to control dust. 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. There is no surface water body on the site in the immediate vicinity. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet)the described waters? If yes, describe and attach available plans. No 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None 4 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLIC1 2: 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. 6) Will the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. Presently,waste water from remediation is discharged to the METRO sewer system. Surface runoff during construction and facility operation will be discharged to the storm water system. b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No, except groundwater as required for remediation. All groundwater withdrawal will be discharged to Metro under current permit#292. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any(for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals ...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None. c. Water Runoff(including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff(including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any(include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Site storm water is presently collected in drainage lines and discharged to the City's storm sewer system in Garden Avenue to the West of the site and North 86 north of the site. All of the R&D facility currently drains north to Lake Washington via site storm drain and City of Renton storm drains. During remediation activity, storm water which contacts contaminated debris will be collected, analyzed, treated (if necessary) and discharged to the METRO sewer system. 5 A TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLIC f: 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Unlikely. Erosion control measures will be taken to prevent migration of contaminated debris. Contaminated storm water will be treated and discharged to METRO. Chemicals will be stored in contained areas to prevent runoff to the storm drains. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, or runoff water impacts, if any: See items c.1 and 2 above. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other _X_evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other X shrubs grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other _X_other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? None planned to be moved at this time. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Existing landscaping was designed for the road frontage along North 8th and Garden streets with trees and shrubs per the City of Renton codes as part of the facility. 6 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLIC.._.I': 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: ducks, geese mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: rabbits fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Unknown. It is believed unlikely that the site is part of a migration route. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy(electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar)will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. The building addition will require Natural Gas for heating and electricity for lighting and general power. These utilities already serve the existing building. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Energy efficient lighting and heating will comply with current codes. 7 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLIC_ 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. The construction of this building addition will be performed on a remediated "Superfund" site. All excavations will be monitored and performed by certified environmental contractors. The contractors health and safety plan will minimize the possibility of exposure to health hazards. 1) Describe any special emergency services that might be required. Emergency medical services might be required in the event of a construction accidental release of contaminated materials. This is addressed in the health and Safety Plan. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: All work will be done in accordance with the specific construction health and safety plans. Any off-site transport of contaminated debris will occur in accordance with state and federal regulations. A site-specific SPCC plan with emergency response and notification provisions has been prepared for accidental spills or releases. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment operation, other)? Does not apply. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short-term - Noise from operation of construction equipment and truck traffic would occur between 7:00am and 5:00pm, except to the extent curtailed by ordinance or other legal restrictions. Long-term - See 7.b.3 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Site generated noise is near zero. Occasionally, a tractor/trailer will make a delivery and leave or a prototype truck will come and go from the property. There are no plans to reduce this further at this time as traffic is sporadic. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The Paccar-Renton property is occupied by a Kenworth Truck Manufacturing plant, a Kenworth R&D facility, an office building in the southern portion of the site and a truck decking facility operated by Dallas and Mavis. 8 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLIC T: b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Not since the early 1940's.. c. Describe any structures on the site. The site has a Research and Development building measuring approximately 60' x 120'. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Heavy Industrial (H-1) f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Employment area - Heavy Industrial g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 5-15 people will be working full time at this facility. The completed project will not result in any additional employees in the foreseeable future. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N/A. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and project land uses and plans, if any: None necessary. 9 , TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT: 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? The existing structure and proposed addition are 24' in height. The proposed addition is designed to the same materials as the existing structure for aesthetic match. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None planned. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? None. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None planned. io TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT: 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Coulon Park and Lake Washington are in the vicinity. There is also a bicycle/jogging track surrounding the 80 acre property that this site is part of. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. This project would not displace a recreational area. During construction, however, the bicycle/jogging track that borders one side of this area would be temporarily disturbed while the entrance to this area is being reworked. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None planned. 13. Historical and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None. 11 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLIC. .!': 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The 82 acre Paccar Renton site is bounded by North 8th Street, Garden Avenue North, North 4th Street and vacated Houser Way. Access to the project site will be through any one of two gates just south of N. 8th Street on Garden. (See attached topographical plan) b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? The nearest bus stop is one block away. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? The existing parking space for 12 cars will not be disturbed. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of)water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed projects? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. There would be no increase in vehicular trips per day beyond current use. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any. None planned. 12 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT: 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services(for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None planned. 16. Utilities a. Circl- ' ' •- . -ntl available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse, ervice, telephone, sanitary sewe , eptic system, of . b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. All utilities required for this project are on the site at this time. C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: Name Printed: J. A. Bredal, A.I.A., Associate Architect Date: June 15, 1999 13 Pacific Engineering June 25, 1999 Technologies • Ms. Laureen Nicolay CITY OF RENTON Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton, Washington 98055 Consulting Services p�/ELOPMENTITY OF RENTO PLANNING Since 1960 C Joseph M.Bozick,PE,SE President Subject: Project Narrative � 1999 Proposed Expansion R& D Lab JUN 2 Kenworth Truck Company RECEIVED J.A.Bredal,AIA 790 Garden Avenue North Thomas d.Hamm AIA Washington 98055 Gordon D.Hjelm,P PE,SE Renton, E.Frank Hofmeister,PE,SE Mark A.Schaefer,PE,SE Arthur B.Schroeder,PE,SE Dear Ms. Nicolay: Associates In accordance with the City of Renton requirements for Land Use Permit, Master Application, we are submitting the attached application package for review and comment. A summary of the proposed project is as follows: The property is located on the southeast corner of North 8th Street and Garden Avenue North. A brief legal location would be a"PORTION OF THE NE '/4 OF THE SW t/a, SEC. 8, TWP. 23N, R. 5E. PORTION OF LOTS 3-8, PLAT OF RENTON FARM ACREAGE, VOL. 12, PG. 37". A complete legal description is attached. The site area inside the existing fence line is approximately 95,000 square feet. The use of the site and the existing structure is used by the Kenworth Truck Company for the development of prototype truck models. It is not anticipated that the use of the site will change in the near future. The current zoning designation is heavy industrial (IH). The City of Renton comprehensive plan designation is the same. The project consists of the expansion to the existing Kenworth Truck Company research and development laboratory. The subject building expansion is proposed to occur in two areas of the building. 1. The first floor will extend southward 60 feet by 60 feet wide. 2. The first floor and second floor will expand 20 feet wide by 60 feet long along the northeast elevation. The total area of the expansion is approximately 6,000 square feet. The total building area will be 16,000 square feet. The height of the existing and new building expansion is 24 feet. 99192 Itr City of Renton 6/25/99 1 1300 Dexter Ave.North—Suite 100 o Seattle,Washington 98109 Tel: [206]281-7500 o Fax:[206]281-4611 [800]621-7300 The site is relatively flat and is paved with asphaltic paving. Site drainage is provided by an existing storm drain system. The soil conditions under the asphaltic paving consist of black silty sand and brown organic silt. The new project will provide 14% lot coverage. The existing onsite landscaping will be preserved. It is anticipated that the project will cost approximately $200,000.00. The proposed improvements will consist of the same metal building materials that were used on the existing structure. There will be two overhead rolling steel doors on each end of the addition. In accordance with the previously prepared geotechnical reports the building addition foundation will be placed on concrete auger cast piling. Please call if you have any questions or require additional information. Very truly yours, PACIFIC ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGIES, INC. • J. A. Bredal, A.I.A. Associate Architect Enclosure: Legal Description 99192 hr City of Renton 6/25/99 2 Kenworth Truck Company ) Environmental Review for Project Actions Narrative Page 3 LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL D • A strip of land 60 feet wide over and across the northwest quarter of the southeast quarter and the southwest quarter of the southeast quarter in Section 8,Township 23 North,Range 5 East,W.M.,in King County,Washington, extending from the south line of North Eighth Strect(formerly Graham Street), and having a width of 30 feet on each side of and measured at right angles from the following described centerline: Beginning at the northwest corner of the southeast quarter of said Section 8, the north line of said southeast quarter also being the north line of North eighth Strect(formerly Washington Avenue);thence S89°28'19"E along the north line of North Eighth Strect(formerly Washington Avenue),a distance of 423.54 feet,thence S18°01'34"E,a distance of 63.28 feet to the south line of North Eighth Strect(fortnerly Washington Avenue),the true point of beginning of this description. thence continuing S18°01'34"E,a distance of 72.26 feet to a beginning of curve; thence southerly along a uniform curve to the right,having a radius of 573.69, through a total angle of 19°01',a distance of 190.17 feet to the end of the curve; thence SO°59'26"W,a distance a 1,621.58 feet to a beginning of curve; thence southwesterly along a uniform curve to the right,having a radius of 819.02 feet,through a total angle of 22°50',a distance of 326.19 feet to the end of the curve; thence S23°49'26"W,a distance of 404.65 feet to a point on the north line of North Fourth Strcct(formerly Graham Street),which is 30 feet southeasterly, measured at right angles,from the southeasterly line of Block 13 of Car Works Addition to Renton; EXCEPT that portion thereof lying northerly of the following described line: Beginning at the intersection of the centerline of Houser Way North(formerly Railroad Avenue),with the easterly production of the southerly margin of North Eighth Strect(formcrly Washington Avenue);thence S18°01'34"E along said centerline,a distance of 72.25 feet to the point of a curve to the right,with a radius of 573.69 feet; thence continuing southeasterly along the arc of a curve to the right,having a radius of 573.69 feet,an arc length of 190.71 feet to the point of tangency of said curve; thence N89°00'54"W,a distance of 30 feet to the westerly margin of Houser Way North(formerly Railroad Avenue); thence northerly along the westerly margin of Ilouscr\Vay North(formerly Railroad Avenue),a distance of 1.25 feet to a point on the arc of a curve to the right,having a radius of 691.78 feet,an arc distance of 102.18 feet easterly from the beginning of said curve,the true point of beginning of said line; thence continuing southeasterly along the arc of said curve,a distance of 77.94 feet to the easterly margin of said Houser Way North(formerly Railroad Avenue),the terminiation of said line; AND EXCEPT the cast 10.00 feet of the south 395 feet thereof; Situate in the City of Renton,County of King,State of Washington. Containing approximately 135,579 square feet or 3.112 acres,more or less. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE • • APPLICATIONSLAND USE PERMIT SUBMITTAL WAIVED • 1.1MODIFIED REQUIREMENTS BY BY ...•........ Calculations, SurveyDrainage Control Plan 2 • • Ja. Drainage Report 2 VC . - T10N-) .. .• • Elevations ArchIteCtUral3AN04 Elevations, Grading 2 Existing Covenants (Recorded y Existing Easements (Recorded Copy) 4 Flood Plain Map if applicable • . . • • Floor Plans G e otecbnic01 Report 2O3 • Grading Plan, Conceptual 2 Grading Plan Detailed 2 King Cbunty Assessor'rs Map Indicating Site 4 , ... Landscaping Plan ConceptuaI4 Legal Description 4 .. List of sutT.06nding.Pope.rlypWpers4 • • • • • •...•••• •• •••• Mailing Labels for Property Owners 4 Map of Existing Site Conditions 4 " • .• •• .• •,:.•• Master Application Form 4 ...„ . . Monument.carcs....(one....per.-nop4rnent) Parking, Lot Coverage & Landscaping Analysis 4 • • Plari Reductions (PMTs) 4 Postage 4 Public Works Approval Letter? •-)( Title Report or Plat-Certificate 4 Topography Map (5' contours)3 Traffic Study 2 Tree CuttingNeaetation Clearing Plan Utilities Plan, Generalized? ef-l`TIOLN ln-1( mes/Scc-,01. : Wetlands Delineation Map.: Wetlands Planting Wetlands Study, 1 This requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services Section PROJECT NAME: Public Works Plan Review Section 3 Building Section DATE: Planning SeGliQn T Unified Soil C11 isification (USC) System Soil Grain Size Size of Opening in Inches Number of Mesh per Inch (US Standard) Grain Size in Millimetres CO CO f '1 N — 0 0 0 — N n N — O O O O O O 1. N •`al) N \ CI 0 N t0 O O p O O O O O O O O O O N — P) t7 I 1 11 1 1 I ill I I I I I I I 1 T I I I I 1 Hill I l i I I J I 1 Ill t t I I I I " II ! 1 1 I 111 I l 11 ) I ill I I l l l l 1 1 I 1 I 0 0 O O 0 O O 0 O m 1D A N — m tO 1 A N 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O 0 0 O m 10 , 17 N - 0 O O O O 0 N Grain Size in Millimetres j . COBBLES GRAVEL SAND SILT and CLAY Coarse-Grained Soils Fine-Grained Soils JCoarse- Grained Soils G W GP G M G C S W S P S M S C J Clean GRAVEL <5% fines GRAVEL with >12% fines Clean SAND <5% fines SAND with >12% fines GRAVEL >50% coarse fraction larger than No. 4 SAND >50% coarse fraction smaller than No. 4 Coarse-Grained Soils >50% larger than No. 200 sieve j IfD I>4 for G W [D70:0ID101 G W and S W I so & 1= 53 G P and S P Clean GRAVE! or SAND not meeting Dio >6 for S W requirements for G rl and S W G M and S M Atterberg limits below A Line G C and S C Atterberg limits above A Line with PI <4 with PI >7 w Coarse-grained soils with percentage of fines between 5 and 12 are consicered borderline cases requiring use of dual symbols. D1O. D . and 060 are the particle diameter of which 10. 30. and 60 percent. respectively. 7m) of the soil weight are finer. Fine- Grained Soils - J M L C L 0 L M H C H 0 H Pt SILT CLAY I Organic SILT CLAY Organic Highly Organic Sails with Liquid Limit <50% Soils with Liquid Limit >50% Soils 1 Fine-Grained Soils >50% smaller than No. 200 sieve 60 1 1 1 I I ( 1 I :I 50 - C H x .j40 - I ; 30 - C L P V1 - ... N M H or 0 H r°° 20 - io - CL - ML ML i07 ' ., , , , , , , , 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 60 90 100 Liquid Limit -- Iu WATCROWSER J-4329 12/95 Figure B-1 LIQUID AND PLASTIC LIMITS TEST REPORT 60 CH or 0H 50 JCL or OL x 0 40 Z H • H u 30 H H U) a 1 a 20 HATCHED AREA IS I10 _ - ML-CL - • T1177-T1_ MLorOL MHorOH j 0 ' / 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 BO 90 100 1 LIQUID LIMIT Location + Description LL PL PI -200 ASTM D 2487-90 i • HC-1, 5-14 ML, Silt Depth: 67 .5'- 69 .0 ' 48 37 11 Nat . W.C .= 41% A HC-1, S-16 CH, clay Depth: 78 .7 '-79 .0 ' 51 27 24 Nat . W.C . = 34% ] • :1 :I Remarks: Project: R 6 D Building Addition )1 Client: Paccar :I Location: Renton, WA IJ-4329 4/3/95 :iii Figure 8-2 I ci6Anal ticalTechnologies,Inc. 560 Naches Avenue, S.W., Suite 101, Renton, WA 98055 (206) 228-8335 y Susan M. Snyder, Laboratory Manager • J1 I ATI I.D. # 504089 May 17, 1995 Hart Crowser, Inc. 1910 Fairview Avenue East I— Seattle WA 98102-3699 Attention : Roy Kuroiwa Project Number : 4329 11Project Name : Paccar R&D Building ►' Dear Mr. Kuroiwa: On April 26 , 1995 , Analytical Technologies, Inc . (ATI) , received one Tsample for analysis . The sample was analyzed with EPA methodology or equivalent methods as specified in the attached analytical schedule . The results, sample cross reference, and quality control data are enclosed. Sincerely, . prim 1-- Je e L. ettit Senior . Project Manager JLP/hal/elf allEnclosure 1- Corporate Offices: 5550 Morehouse Drive San Diego,CA 92121 (619)458-9141 4 Jl 1 / \ I n to iesIn Analyt�ca Tech o g c. ATI I .D. # 504089 SAMPLE CROSS REFERENCE SHEET CLIENT : HART CROWSER, INC. , PROJECT # : 4329 PROJECT NAME : PACCAR R&D BUILDING ATI # CLIENT DESCRIPTION DATE SAMPLED MATRIX 504089-1 R&D BLDG. 04/26/95 SOIL 1 a • TOTALS MATRIX # SAMPLES SOIL 1 ATI STANDARD DISPOSAL PRACTICE The samples from this project will be disposed of in thirty (30) days from the date of the report . If an extended storage period is required, please contact our sample control department before the scheduled disposal date. .1... • 2 ��AnalyticalTechnologies,Inc. ATI I .D. # 504089 ANALYTICAL SCHEDULE 41 1 CLIENT . HART CROWSER, INC. PROJECT # : 4329 PROJECT NAME : PACCAR R&D BUILDING ANALYSIS TECHNIQUE REFERENCE LAB L POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS (PCBs) GC/ECD EPA 8080 R [ARSENIC AA/GF EPA 7060 R CHROMIUM ICAP EPA 6010 R LEAD ICAP EPA 6010 R 1 EMOISTURE GRAVIMETRIC CLP SOW ILM01 . 0 R 1 r 1 i r� ry 1 r i r I R = ATI - Renton SD = ATI - San Diego PHX = ATI - Phoenix PTL = ATI - Portland - ANC = ATI - Anchorage PNR = ATI - Pensacola FC = ATI - Fort Collins SUB = Subcontract 4 3 di AnalyticalTechnologies,Inc. ATI I .D. # 504089 PCB ANALYSIS DATA SUMMARY ``CLIENT : HART CROWSER, INC. DATE SAMPLED : N/A 1 PROJECT # : 4329 DATE RECEIVED : N/A ROJECT NAME : PACCAR R&D BUILDING DATE EXTRACTED : 04/27/95 It LIENT I .D. : METHOD BLANK DATE ANALYZED 05/07/95 ,IrSAMPLE MATRIX SOIL UNITS : mg/Kg PA METHOD : 8080 DILUTION FACTOR : 1 ESULTS ARE CORRECTED FOR MOISTURE CONTENT 14 COMPOUNDS RESULTS PCB 1016 <0 . 033 CB 1221 <0 . 033 CB 1232 <0 . 033 PCB 1242 <0 . 033 PCB 1248 <0 . 033 CB 1254 <0 . 033 CB 1260 <0 . 033 41 SURROGATE PERCENT RECOVERY LIMITS vDECACHLOROBIPHENYL 108 20 - 138 ''> .IBUTYLCHLORENDATE 71 20 - 154 4 li!I 4 A Anal ticalTechnolo ies,Inc. Y 9 ATI I.D. # 504089-1 PCB ANALYSIS L.3 DATA SUMMARY CLIENT HART CROWSER, INC. DATE SAMPLED 04/26/95 DATE RECEIVED 04/26/95 DATE EXTRACTED 04/27/95 PROJECT # : 4329 PROJECT NAME : PACCAR R&D BUILDING CLIENT I .D. R&D BLDG. DATE ANALYZED : 05/07/95 SAMPLE MATRIX : SOIL UNITS : mg/Kg 1 EPA METHOD : 8080 DILUTION FACTOR : 1 RESULTS ARE CORRECTED FOR MOISTURE CONTENT r I COMPOUNDS RESULTS r PCB 1016 <0 . 036 PCB 1221 <0 . 036 PCB 1232 <0 . 036 PCB 1242 <0 . 036 riPCB 1248 <0 . 036 PCB 1254 <0 . 036 PCB 1260 <0 . 036 ISURROGATE PERCENT RECOVERY LIMITS DECACHLOROBIPHENYL 103 20 - 138 DIBUTYLCHLORENDATE 71 20 - 154 I I A I r x 4 V I II J /J AnalyticalTechnologies,Inc. 5 Al . ATI I.D. # 504089 PCB ANALYSIS -• QUALITY CONTROL DATA CLIENT : HART CROWSER, INC. SAMPLE I.D. # : BLANK �, PROJECT # : 4329 DATE EXTRACTED : 04/27/95 x� PROJECT NAME : PACCAR R&D BUILDING DATE ANALYZED : 05/07/95 -' SAMPLE MATRIX : SOIL UNITS : mg/Kg j, EPA METHOD : 8080 I I • DUP. DUP. SAMPLE SPIKE SPIKED % SPIKED COMPOUNDS RESULT ADDED RESULT REC. SAMPLE REC. RPD PCB 1260 <0 . 0333 0 . 333 0 . 354 106 N/A N/A N/A J CONTROL LIMITS % REC. RPD PCB 1260 74 - 120 31 1 SURROGATE RECOVERIES SPIKE DUP. SPIKE LIMITS 5' DECACHLOROBIPHENYL 109 N/A 20 - 138 DIBUTYLCHLORENDATE 103 N/A 20 - 154 r F p i I 6 i.4 L AnalyticalTechnologies,Inc. J • ATI I.D. # 504089 I:: PCB ANALYSIS QUALITY CONTROL DATA CLIENT : HART CROWSER, INC. SAMPLE I .D. # : 504067-4 PROJECT # : 4329 DATE EXTRACTED : 04/27/95 PROJECT NAME : PACCAR R&D BUILDING DATE ANALYZED : 05/07/95 w,SAMPLE MATRIX : SOIL UNITS : mg/Kg L- EPA METHOD : 8080 Lw. DUP. DUP. SAMPLE SPIKE SPIKED a SPIKED '' COMPOUNDS RESULT ADDED RESULT REC. SAMPLE REC. RPD ' PCB 1260 <0 . 0333 0 .333 0 . 353 106 0 . 356 107 1 CONTROL LIMITS % REC. RPD PCB 1260 55 - 131 31 j SURROGATE RECOVERIES SPIKE DUP. SPIKE LIMITS 197DECACHLOROBIPHENYL 109 111 20 - 138 DIBUTYLCHLORENDATE 88 91 20 - 154 7 7 1 i.. I 4 7 AnaIyticaITechnOIOgies,Inc. ATI I.D. # 504089 J. METALS ANALYSIS 1_ ICLIENT : HART CROWSER, INC. MATRIX : SOIL 1 ?ROJECT # : 4329 ',?ROJECT NAME : PACCAR R&D BUILDING ELEMENT DATE PREPARED DATE ANALYZED RSENICi; 05/02/95 05/03/95 [CHROMIUM 05/02/95 05/03/95 LEAD 05/02/95 05/03/95 9 7 3 i 4 Lrog k 8 AnalyticalTechnologies,Inc. ATI I.D. # 504089 3 METALS ANALYSIS DATA SUMMARY CLIENT : HART CROWSER, INC. MATRIX : SOIL PROJECT # : 4329 PROJECT NAME : PACCAR R&D BUILDING UNITS : mg/Kg RESULTS ARE CORRECTED FOR MOISTURE CONTENT ATI I.D. # CLIENT I .D. ARSENIC CHROMIUM LEAD 504089-1 R&D BLDG. 14 53 83 METHOD BLANK - <0 .25 <0 .50 <1 . 5 I 1 L. T. 1, 9 LAnalyticalTechnologies,Inc. ilATI I.D. # 504089 METALS ANALYSIS QUALITY CONTROL DATA CLIENT : HART CROWSER, INC. MATRIX : SOIL PROJECT # : 4329 : ?ROJECT NAME : PACCAR R&D BUILDING UNITS : mg/Kg SAMPLE DUP SPIKED SPIKE % I LEMENT ATI I .D. RESULT RESULT RPD RESULT ADDED REC. ASENIC BLANK <0 .250 N/A N/A 2 . 10 2 . 00 105 ARSENIC 504077-3 <0 . 624 <0 . 618 NC 2 . 32 2 .42 93 :HROMIUM BLANK <0 . 500 N/A N/A 44 .2 50 . 0 88 2HROMIUM 504077-3 12 . 6 12 .2 3 61 . 5 58 . 1 84 LEAD BLANK <1.50 N/A N/A 43 . 1 50 . 0 86 C,EAD 504077-3 <1. 78 <1. 76 NC 49 . 9 58 . 1 86 C = Not Calculable. r I Recovery = (Spike Sample Result - Sample Result) X 100 Spike Concentration RPD (Relative % Difference) = I (Sample Result - Duplicate Result) ! X 100 Average Result Oil )t 10 / ITethnol ies „�Jj Analyt�ca og Inc., il ATI I.D. # 504089 GENERAL CHEMISTRY ANALYSIS li'll CLIENT : HART CROWSER, INC. MATRIX : SOIL PROJECT # : 4329 PROJECT NAME : PACCAR R&D BUILDING LI DATE ANALYZED PARAMETER MOISTURE 04/27/95 I ?• [ \ I L L 1 I 1 11 1 ) AnalyticalTechnologies,Inc. ATI I.D. # 504089 GENERAL CHEMISTRY ANALYSIS DATA SUMMARY CLIENT : HART CROWSER, INC. MATRIX : SOIL PROJECT # : 4329 PROJECT NAME : PACCAR R&D BUILDING UNITS : % ATI I.D. # CLIENT I .D. MOISTURE 504089-1 R&D BLDG. 7 . 7 Irwr L... r OOP S 1 12 AnalyticalTechnologies,I nc. ATI I .D. # 504089 GENERAL CHEMISTRY ANALYSIS QUALITY CONTROL DATA I. CLIENT : HART CROWSER, INC. MATRIX : SOIL PROJECT # : 4329 PROJECT NAME : PACCAR R&D BUILDING UNITS : o i SAMPLE DUP SPIKED SPIKE ;` PARAMETER ATI I .D. RESULT RESULT RPD RESULT ADDED REC MOISTURE 504088-3 24 24 0 . N/A N/A N/A l r 1 L ( ___ I 1 iii L 1 Recovery = (Spike Sample Result - Sample Result) x 100 i '— Spike Concentration RPD (Relative o Difference) = l (Sample Result - Duplicate Result) : 1._ x 100 Average Result 4 , L. ".,:;2.,?': -•-•.KL—. .1<3L..—.. 6--.,..'.,Aap--. 1.--a1afit "ri l4�!"3`L''Y�. .wem'''.. ..--.--- ---.--....._ j • Hart Crowser, Inc. #V9C / oW Seattle, Fairview Avenue East Sample Custody Record DATE PAGE OFI . Washington East </3 Z, LAB NUMBER 4 TESTING N JOB NUMBER ¢ tu PROJECT MANAGER g I Kurt>I I,J�f Z TA c-�A R- RED 1t', z OBSERVATIONS/COMMENTS/ PROJECT NAME U COMPOSITING INSTRUCTIONS ). u. SAMPLED BY: o ...JJJ z LAB NO. SAMPLE TIME STATION MATRIX , I Pvb? , V205 lt.D WICIA' 351 1 N'N _ -Ti4/ JlA gb -FAT- _ RELINQUISHED BY DATE RECEI ED BY DATE TOTAL NUMBER METHOD OF SHrIPMENT I 1 0/ _ OF CONTAINERS 1 Q` Y-ti`I Jec_ • T A4A * SIGyo E SHIPMENT/HANDLING aA ::) SPECIAL p T ME IM �{.'1'tPr- TIME OR STORAGE REQUIREMENTS INT NAME RINTENAME COMPANY COMPANY RELINQUISHED BY DATE RECEIVED BY DATE DISTRIBUTION: • 1. PROVIDE WHITE AND YELLOW COPIES TO LABORATORY SIGNATURE SIGNATURE TIME TIME 2. RETURN PINK COPY TO PROJECT MANAGER PRINTED NAME PRINTED NAME 3. LABORATORY TO FILL IN SAMPLE NUMBER AND SIGN FOR RECEIPT 4. LABORATORY TO RETURN WHITE COPY TO HART CROWSER COMPANY COMPANY -�•♦ 1;.� r .jy,ry � ,It 1...'t iu l ,r + ,;t: � Y 4 n .. 7 �; r ,T ��"r d+y �i ,• yui t S`= .,r� tee lia.�sf .�• tax Y . i$Lr�vj, r k"tea •t n4 •..,i ';,•%M N 4ri <' , •^7. .'"' Styr ,r� s .L "a•-S.?k#rd 4j'o'•• .r-%,•471 y�+.,4 .,T' 'Ka &'k; -� i a+ , r" �i!Cl`' i ";t%+t.`��,+: -? ' i+�st? 'S 't �ir,„e4 r�-;.0i R,I ter i s i» ••••. ,.iol �'r�rn'T s•y^ < ! t • ,•,;,41-, �`• +.•, v,a.gr � i .' '� e�• rsi • , ,�, T fe• • fh �' t.•c,�r'r •. Is°`it i' `► .•.0';� Y• . ,�?:'9x`Qis`•tr r •�,'1�� ,t •�¢"` �4• ��, yytf V ,. r °- 1 t.*,�,r A-Y'r ``,,p;;.,t ..ta},�• •4#,' 4 ; P i, ,,L- `i� . "` b' • �.. ��a3Lkr • fy + `��tt '` r" ,'^ • �j �t• , 'e• i miii �+ , `fir• � }'. c. ti19 .r. ,t t,3• Z t r' o $ i • t� '14+'i�+J �` vR+ { c" ,�faaa��k��„yt_: .•�t 'u3�� .P t�" 'nS �.+ v A i j §�r1 i. ;f p � 9: ;.+, I -', 1a}� ,4c 4y ; lti i • a 11, U .t ' �. t {y ,y.} •Lyy' t. �! s`Y,P.24- ,.�,!,c�,(y t4 ,t'.�< Y .tt.:A�1i� a t , ` }�i"n 'r'. 5.1 r . k iSW"',1C f�h 4 "`fr r 1,,. t# gi. • , +R' •. ." .ly�Y �,`�, r• t,J.'�-� �`��'s�a'� `. 4 h'k, r^f`:r ErL� ,� t,t.i H��� � � [P y t t i.�iG, "rF,+ ' -C7" 1. { ; ! • rt Ajr'cm. 'z � 'reuL .'.rj� F .y •F' ' r`�t' t . •�'""'r�, .. . +-,'.• ?,w:"yam!7-r; „p�`.�4�177ii� �yry�I� '.'%`trD' �r y s.n -+ .. '6•t +� y ' �C_'` t 1! � f : t S' ,.- i,' Y.r. a,s"' i71,y 4'.1 e? ��, Y7r4146.fr'a ti e J j• ) Y+y. 1 9tw *. 3;•ti T'► , ' M, `ki .+`. v;., t fir} ' �y �i is° �z'11 , ? h �' '; •,at" y�' ' • s�L'� t •4 ,. •�`$,F� .i , ., 51,���' ` L - S c o^ti4° ,, ,..., 1�k Or a ' ri?` +i' � �r- �,��:•'.�1'lr'�' .'',�T�kj�y'�Yk�S�,�" .t �5r 'p, Aa�q� �,,�FySr•y�y,� � i n��,t'v4�`;. S- �,' G'i. � '�Y▪ .f�� '��i'� �..t t • :-'l +_. ♦ r.*,,,..,•-'.':: . .; •` 0Ab ..,:,..= . .4' ,„, 1p ii•Y T r,1%,..40.:rggS�. ''rs. 4*_,,,, ,t✓ r�"� .,a` +t.; '"t ' ; r+ ;-t. •ry.S j, •. • ..," .� f;T 1art�' ,,6 Y�4•, f t �`.vFiL.. • .-,- •C)nznl Cr�+ h(.fib" s�*s" '" '' •C +. r ,. ,•9F�,! .v • 4 y, yyyj1�� lid•� >. aF'4 L Y� to ,ix 4 ,x%'i aC 4 ',•v Y`'S7. .. it .Pr' - ' r.^ •�+ $ j1•40- k,k! J` r`�PV 'fr A. .i ij K '} ft fi� Ff' .`� + . t om may' (+, = NL Y . •, Y ate,ti"''3 •�i> My i b ..v ;�' '`tAA;h � '? !S' i` w b_• ,,t 4',,,i if,• . .4 i� r�� Ty. i4 ,'t M�.''^ , ,,,,, t k.A .� 4;••• r'L`' t,," f P&S "i�-. :± +' c� .-q• „�,� • >E '+4t'r;,-r 1.• is I'LF'" ,x�,�j a yert t a,�" � � 1 .',r�� , �ii'.ff'J ""'• �. '..�7r '�h� ,� Y � � r 5 ty, ir. 4� ,✓ � t• st9 'C "`t r +� c� N � 1- *.,'.,- ... V j>':"a >t�,.,y �1i .`'� �' ,1w(, r t r ; + a , _f ;4'i Y't ."F` �`•",t; :1 vfs x -. t 'r..r � � T1fC1'. � 7i � .� ,:Y. b � � 7• ,i.�a 'ir.� ,rjy y„ @..•{T1r',�`T•� •�. T � '. t s. ..t.��,rk a s•4�'�' � £ *,. ft- {1-. a ,ntl.`h' '�L""� tL', _ e Ra'4 r t r,ryt4 '}29 7 .x�� '#Y j,'N � i. ,!, tYy y. .oa w • .. R. '� x `°AT.I •� ' �: ,,, Yi,�'S'its- r+• - ,i !fTti'.'set ri. � 4 "a. ' -k .... i• .l 'r' +''i R, 4 :A$.�" £,4.`A i" _q' •+ •.:t' N 4� .1 •. t ,` ',"it++`'.,,-.-. ,; ::t_. .rr•�T Ti'F � '� r^:�`^ 4 i,: ' � • `Ft 'r „,- •:n • f � +bpi r y �•," w• !fK^ - C �ri '` :-r r ••s�•a � h';, p�f� . , ,�'e a `�� �• ra .- .r �i� ��Sl ; .y•,t jP 9 1• y 5Y>��,,�r�r�.� �"'�' `��.�g 'r,,a,, 7�� t ���� '�'Y'� "�'�` s.' .A• ,�,• `�'J�+�,,,, �i, �4+ �yy.i. �`...t r�•F1 'ft` �; T',, it`'1"tvzis' a!, .. *iii.� }, ,'IS 9 y� P• ..y'r yxi.. >r r •� y?'}tt +r-, p v�1' f _.,• Yr'6t,��•t rrl ,s +•� j ^s ,rY ` F't_""7 *' •'�4+..nt in 7•r!r' 1.k r act• T t t' i. J tq,Y 1, v ' J, fit '•L. +f � r+,• c b �1 t.. :y m. 4;a',{,', , Cy 'a, , z t. e '•%.1k"` y ' t .� 4 S1 it .. a• c,..i.?... S s ,yi e 1 �` `+�: E ,,3" �s w 4! { fi, , Al.. r :�.•.. •a,t, r 8 } ' .,ti ..r,,�"• r k , }1s "i y: �r�-t;+•`� y ' ' j ri t� y�� a Tl+ .a, sy +'��t ti' .. k.y. ,"Z �1s' �j .t. � �� �F n iti 1'v► �I ... t, i^iJ y, ,5" :e 7 , ',. •rX '+� !, 4 T '. r.:J P Z. h,iitiT •r''F� ..k 4- '' Y, ,, 'x`,'" i....,.. f�. 4 7 ,x s .1 �i•, v �f 7 ty Srry,;Pr { tf J'+Gyt � � sF ;�r�► v to rv, ' sli i •r r :wT. , >t /. a. .4.•,.+yi '=, Y _ 5,, t t .'�t , ::F ham P .„ .*,,� ? t ,�f r'E ���. •�$ �+' M� klt, �,`���.i �, ,.'`;� ' � .� L�^ �. ,�?Ta„ ''; e;II • •• • ,,JT,4-7. • ,, 'l' s t .4i ,r t4 t tiff,/ = INA a yj .44.r tlt '" i + *r *". n 'y xi+llt;` '1 , a •+, ''`y,.0'' ''' k,'' '14+ 1- �a l' :'xy�.' ..fir y�£4.` ,. ,, ,', fi '' p. ,7,,4 r E... ¢ it��':,:i• • .;,� 't•a ar #e T s'- 'J �i'`.! t. � ry My�.,�'yf Sk> � [ y 14 4�w.r . "y'.N. g�N•r`' �4Fy,.',', •aSyw- Y• y ,, •Ck'.,,' �� Ar'i x2 .'". l44Za''r��``�c�� ♦ . '•':qria,�1 i•.y a6 ,'( Y �'. .�4CT ,,}y.-- l 4' ✓r {fi7 bs4. +i M •:[,v�I,,44 .• 1? •',•',in••r? #,Ti• (n 5:� g,' t '4^' 1r4•-• ti �•�, 4'Cvy r:,}w "" z 0.'�r T - .' •lro-+,, '' ‘aT,->• v tat. 74n;; t ,�{ M ya`'' ���fQj.7,}'+ i%'4 h rr � i 1 +_ f `t�t•fir + '. g ^'"r�i t rr , • �`r` ,,;.?y' t�5^,Y 'tir Ya. c a :'i +fi. �y+,;(� Y W r +��At - � k `b �t •:- y ,,y.• j ri ?'".- ._ tt�,t��f�,,„., i. �( ?. fi t•• t,? 7 t ' , I, Y t -/ * ,Y'4.. ,i, C."'��,r dray- ;-7- ,--,• j 'Y7''- •.04444 y. • .i'l,i' 1 •9•OY ,1,,-'J^S1,,-.. ••� A" "4y N. l J. fi 'T : Y,'p+� rr .,i¢ -0„, 'IS"Y y �X.-. •!`,��, > :�` t r.�'<+i =+ y'•4.,,-f �t F" , .) Nj"r k4. ';''r'' Taf,. trst. ^. n • F(� �{ ., i 4'..a'.d t ',v•• . ,. AIy .. e ° ,t tw y�A , yo �S, t ``.i�ce�.. F, ,..ql t¢ ,4. sty,, #:---A? . `t. •ii..4• t '•3 a1"t 'r f • �,L'QMt'r •� ',r. � � �� � t.,,.,„••• • �t '4a• ,'r a_-x. 7' r '•4 s•# 53'c 7. �y. AA 7y� - t+K} -C.. 4'+" ,� . J. dt' :., ''• i+•+,ts ..y ,�•..'., r. ,� ,„.fe' }r`�''�;"'sX'.`t`_,!lsy )Y eC}� ' O''1'+ '�� 4 rL' iw` ty.r '� r �t ra *' .#3 ',rk M •p, vi`a+Lr"� n "�'y' '�fr' ..,r°' .4, "%`vr ^�+1?�,, ;+-�lSt �tti4.�' -s6 } ,i r 't ' ~ ��} . -r F .i1.+y' d;,,,,�'r •'`f+!'. vi + a' . • Y{�' � '!+i't' I • L i•, �'rJ+'•r'l'• '8O4,, • - , .rw-�•x>xj� *4' t k;e' -;{*d.,,,-�` F a fr 4 ►�y O y14'.• ./t., 4 4 ♦�' • r , +. M. ih , ^" ' 'F' T._Yrr•i T `xf`i t. • ••y�▪ 't•"oi.4.T+ • �N•• F' � _y"•",IA it ,�41. I•io i .t" y"- `4 y�T IFS"h} ,e`l et ,r+ ,y b +!`. . •,••tyl ..�.,F3TO���T.eW�•.ry �,!'S,'r T.i".�•l ""#p�a q ,lda'>.Q �^+i`" ��.� Y�a+�y -,r'4�,�k„t'F�..$u�7-,yt�{�a}.. C+,h•+'# 14 � `• O � O` -• at l r U M • j }f§.4, 7 7^,' Q�'' +i"G Q3�n r' `' 1�''! , " <= 4^, - �,`+ 'Yn jl, �' °gyp }.� '•t'�''� pya �S .X'ad' y.i,i*, Int �. � .. -�. .,° 1„ ar a:,,,L.M _ t�e''. f���tt,� � `*���. 8. ���"�J'r J,i • fK''li Eby, ;"..V//'i��', ,,Yw, �?�{6 e. u•! d '(q ,,;�+fyi4, '� �yy 'i cv y,.+ •5:.+ 8 ,,f'r�`;K #b .srt ♦ s� y rr } J�,�,v�.. rf�'�IJ t 6,r� `d4uh `f�•, • iF .vf^Fs.,N•^,{u5_ .i ..• 3w. y 4. R�yy ." i4'E' • ,'riS, a- s ,�at_y�/r' a�r, �, .1,,,, rS4 > •,. • :'f�• ' kmt,, •s� 1?, • `, • . _ _ ;` sY�•�f''� vsrf•iar.5 .: .: .,..,,v. .,,,. , ..„' .� . + '� '{• h."� roi'�' j j >y�,, A �'v;�i'^` ,fq ,. ,4tY!b y • �'s.,.• ., • .(` y .'� 4 r , ' S ,Y R1:i ) } r•,t.r„ ,'tom ~ + yy :t _ s' f �'. �`'. Yd. • 4.' fr., ..i. i` ,a ts' r. k�,, a •. dry' i :r'o >.'+,r '� i , .. `.';S'CiT J- -*i,�. K ,r ? r 1a *..= f� ;?-+,• +"rir am s,1 tq. w �'a, 4-,'1"{,r,y. . .� b rti if,,((•;�'_'Y i• Q''v=:. , " -, ''i�a.• r - ., - L 4..t .,t • :' •.0.- ,1'a r\ ka ;'' ,_, ,g „ r f .e`, S, retc '�.±t }�t'ifryy a't4. ,fr rtat4 ti{., --elf' "LF.+•.'."*;;G'4' ii4i4 w _ x - y.,rP�,1, ar ,ter "� , v "'i Lam y�^,`ry,' ➢1 a`�. ..y S .'t• r ,,,y ,t u• 7•'t�t..- 'fit. i+�?Z�f .,. ;... .•'- f,:.,7�b t .'•• 'i,,p141.,,„ti,~r, •C,i'}T,Yr7�0.+' Y.] 'ra,:-•f°' j �",lip,...„, •', v 't'�i,' k'- . -, ; �'R • l::., n:,'i +;try.:_ t `j,: a S '� 4j s7.= #'�'` �'t' 1 „t"axt4.." �:.dfi;� •:!� �lx '�y - ,,.-[. 4'_fty. ` .i g,L'4•yw �=,jY• k 4, `f+rM e`'K ,�� r �t l -,, w% y f. „ri- n x.':"Red wy , ",5� T,a 7 a•. -d�.��. , g x, 4 n t y' ,.+�'• �.,, DtY•W, k� i .;H i1 _ �` '+N4.74, {, 4 i,4, v P• rS'N+�. • 1 •t.4" j- ,,Ytt. y, . 1. $ ,� lv4. tt ., .• -•", r ,.� 'o Vr '�a'4Y�? �,� '4t, 4°"tzi.'S4.§ •a..'!.n .'. h: ' ~ ` ',• : !, � 4P -anti yr�t• �!- - p �. t r tt•. �i, r �F'r �` St' {C- � �@•t f i' e�,. 9:..F�•Fij';� "�` � �•r°• e,.'Cs t' �'�.•.y b 4 �° a s` • �.'�,` v7.=t.1 "_ t"h i3 i•�0Y' ay)y `:, '1t ,A r 4' .46 . '4•• -0 41'..''�•F°`. z's'''' ".F S l -.. r•�' �%' •� 11' s' 7"" ,, �' Y l i a R' 'tt1 T Y' 't`'F!,C'. ''�t.•r"; p '"r�'," �Y- r .. h •+• `!� ?'.:'k ,. F 'P• .��''t' • .7 . kif� y';.4?- ,1,',, ,,,,,. :'xa j;F14 'w'L'.", - r t E£j'•� ^'�"'rt'C' `?t4y '4: "C JA•`t4- . t• '1�� ' • '�'•' ,,r"�,•T,:, �`, ;; . 4w ;.. 1 L� a'u .4 Mre:W Ii r} E':� Yk, p ;f k71 It / t a � � fit � 4%i .t{• X': K °°r��t` �+ 7�t�at t �. 1r Allje� ,_JF 'r�'yr� r �Z •w^ F d • $L ea °j �' .► 'Jh• ...'' 'k il;""' ' '•^.{.I.' X .+{•.1+ + ft.. .MT--47.A11.0 -i! jf,',`X'f'1.''' .s,tk ie r,.[, ' •.- +F..yjl p `_/�. r '�'''-'v� %��t: .tP. ,,,t t #F'•t ' ,•Ly,..J . -�+ j, •.t yR .2,l i" •i•f'M, _- �« Q •':. "ii.` !x t ? L V'' .�`, ,"°rp t, „r -+:. �;1 d'r ..7' :;•Yf i • • • ,�,!s* ` ra,. ^?, � , aR '4, A. > *3i y.. •'" +f n T 7« ar$ ,•'r r,1 3',,q�t7{r +» >•t. • r„`µr .•S,ji'trt..k .4�,.' �..: . i rimer • +i. '51' ?i'trfi. '� ,r tiY+� +f'*<•y r f7 a+3.. • .. «S t..�, .••• _ / I.- v: t. �'{ iA ': y'iS Tro�L t� �` y+r+�'s} / y w+ :a �� "7�x�4 r,, `!,.. Y•f� `h✓, 53t •«>airwlJ"ry° .'�;l S r'`,..,S'. 1+ `a17 l! ''e' r.+,^�• : 1 imi HARTCROW Hart Crowser,Inc 1910 Fairview Avenue East Seattle,Washington 98102-3699 Fax 206328.5581 Tel 206.324.9530 Earth and Environmental Technologies CHEMISTRY LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT June 14, 1995 Roy Kuroiwa, Hart Crowser Project Engineer RE: PACCAR - J-4329 Attached are the compiled results from analyses conducted on a sample collected on April 26, 1995 and received on April 27, 1995. We performed extractions and analyses as indicated: Date Date Matrix Quantity Extracted Analyzed ► TPH-HCID Soil 1 4/28/95 4/28/95 This report contains the following: ► Analytical results for a soil sample presented on a dry weight basis. ► Data qualifiers. ► Results for method blanks. ► Recoveries for laboratory control sample. ► Analytical reporting limits. ► Copies of chain of custody forms. Seattle•Tacoma•Richland•Anchorage•Portland•Denver•Honolulu•San Francisco•Long Beach•San Diego•Mexico City A Hart Crowser J-4329 The following soil sample was analyzed, and results are presented in this report: R&D BLDG. HART CROWSER, INC. J•I ES HERNDON b•ratory Manager Was ington State Department of Ecology Laboratory Accreditation Number C134 Corps of Engineers Validation 4/14/94 Page 2 I. W, _' Hart Crowser J-4329 Analytical Results Results in ppm (mg/kg or mg/L) Duplicate Compound R&D BLDG. R&D BLDG. Matrix Soil Soil % Moisture 8% 8% Gasoline 10 U 10 U Stoddard Solvent 10 U 10 U Kensol 10 U 10 U Kerosene/Jet A 10 U 10 U Diesel/Fuel Oil #2 20 U 20 U Bunker C 50 U 50 U Oil 530 650 Unknown 10 U 10 U Total TPH Concentration 530 650 2-Fluorobiphenyl (surr #1) 105% 104% o-Terphenyl (surr #2) 101% 101% Hexacosane - nC26 (surr #3) 101% 101% Data Qualifiers U Not detected at indicated detection limit. - Below detection limit. J Estimated value below detection limit. B Also detected in associated method blank. M Unable to calculate recovery due to matrix interference. n/t Test not performed. n/a Not applicable. Surr Surrogate compound. Page 3 Is Hart Crowser J-4329 Method Blank Results in ppm (mg/kg or mg/L) Compound 04/28/95 Matrix Soil Gasoline 10 U Stoddard Solvent 10 U Kensol 10 U Kerosene/Jet A 10 U Diesel/Fuel Oil #2 20 U Bunker C 50 U Oil 50 U Unknown 10 U Total TPH Concentration - 2-Fluorobiphenyl (surr #1) 100% o-Terphenyl (surr #2) 97% Hexacosane - nC26 (surr #3) 97% I Page 4 Hart Crowser J-4329 Duplicates Relative % Difference Compound R&D BLDG. Matrix Soil Total TPH Concentration 20% Laboratory Control Sample % Recovery Compound 04/28/95 Matrix Soil Diesel/Fuel Oil #2 89% 2-Fluorobiphenyl (surr #1) 99% o-Terphenyl (surr #2) M Hexacosane - nC26 (surr #3) 98% Page 5 1 L, int Hart Crowser J-4329 Analytical Reporting Limits • Compound Soil Water TPH-HCID in mg/kg or mg/L (ppm) Gasoline 10 0. 2 Kensol 10 0. 4 Kerosene/Jet A 10 0. 4 Stoddard Solvent 10 0 . 2 Diesel/Fuel Oil #2 20 0. 8 Bunker C 50 2 . 0 Oil 50 2 . 0 Unknown 10 0 . 2 Page 6 _ —11101111-- — Hart Crowser, Inc. 1910 Fairview Avenue East Sample Custody Record DATE )1/24S-- PAGE OF / WIRTCROWSER Seattle, Washington 98102-3699 JOB NUMBER `T -5 2- 1 LAB N MBER TESTING cc cn �-r Korb;v_sc, �� �� w PROJECT MANAGER /' �- /� z PROJECT NAME TAv�-` 'g — g 7) "��L Z OBSERVATIONS/COMMENTS/ O COMPOSITING INSTRUCTIONS SAMPLED BY: 3 0 Jj� O Z LAB NO. SAMPLE TIME STATION MATRIX , ith BIA dAL/F5 . _Ria , tea, \ -N, 1 J _ yfiedctittitradE . 1 1 Q-vc-�c <� T - - n le_ ' ' J 7 1 _ RELINQUISHED BY DATE RECEIVED BY DATE TOTAL NUMBER MOF SHIPMENT �at Q(i f1F-CONTAINERS C 1 METHO SJ-� k.fe_� sl R L L� sl N u E SPECIAL SHIPMENT/HANDLING vl(�1 �p TIME 6"- y Z✓moo✓TIME OR STORAGE REQUIREMENTS PRI TED NAMEdG I, PRINir1 NA y�tib ���� COMPANY COMPANY RELINQUISHED BY DATE RECEIVED BY DATE DISTRIBUTION: 1. PROVIDE WHITE AND YELLOW COPIES TO LABORATORY SIGNATURE SIGNATURE , TIME TIME 2. RETURN PINK COPY TO PROJECT MANAGER PRINTED NAME PRINTED NAME 3. LABORATORY TO FILL IN SAMPLE NUMBER AND SIGN FOR RECEIPT 4. LABORATORY TO RETURN WHITE COPY TO HART CROWSER COMPANY COMPANY fk Panned On Rocycbd Papa y� •• • 4 t r .. � t -alb ,,td., i F.�'r• r. '� y+� s s-,•s :•` 3., �Ct,. e:4 ?'. •:!,‘' t 'Yeniylr •••r• v'�Y 1 tits n �`•'f.1 t s �y,. ' rn/ .•t k A fr, G ILI t �• ehp, ''i�t �"�••'a" 'y,�,{,�YR ;•a�aJ ; u%7vy ,�, r 2.,,f -t. 0::•:• + ,r-- M •+�.4 yF3,i • .r • t'-. t: a ♦a e • ; .y • y ' r, . ++wc.,.,-.., ••i•..,,.w.�.r..r'..+ •Y i"F Y 1'f'_.,65.,,- , . S ra �t• •r . ..1 ti S!c ," , .(. ;" ,^ ,, �, .., rfi# '7';, • 4 �. A�+�F���'.^ *�r>k a�, � '.5��,L�.x r .iy � r!`.•. SR,� Y J t •$ ,, a'r ,^Fa y•o h a,. �+._, ♦a23' y t ry,r„At., �-- $ � r ar-,, g�„':y } -� �« .t�t3y t t ,� t4 k''G � L'he'�.�¢' • , r 4 x-1,ti +.ry`IK �` tea• ,c.�` i t • '' � -r_.'` ?-,:,_„...-•,. ..,_,';' 1- a ! 7�y,5 :''3• ' Y ▪ .; i ? ;f.,•E„ �, ✓-ii,•.,:-jj�.•A�^V{ ""� �i ' .�'yi`'4i7f�Tj "�ttiy,l� ' xi V.I `I rr-t- r•''•.,. �',f: yK .,+ ,tt a• '� >ff l rar ��' k s r '-' • Ear't ..Envlro men.ta•rr hno oy a s''' t m 3 •t'' .ffi, ,� , ;'�,c�_' „ '' •Y'nr ;i ...k r7 , r '+t ta� � .x'': * r gir • ,a` , :74, Y,4;,kr't } 7 �'� +' v'' i'• ' "C.,• it..'y Y1,, t . �' ", 'r ( '°' { c?i ••r• h;,,h• i 'a e � '�3'• ,�'+c .{r� �°�' kti f,j },rM1 i '.t:T try�T ✓ r `_9r ' r t--•rM qyn fiR �` �q€ ,� j a 'Sa �� s rO�OtpOratE' ea Uar' 3�r�� , ,t a 42'4 :.r rrn .:', a V". if^ an i C ^ 1,• •f9f0o a_fte ea arte t j 4 + ,r` :, .aF t•" j .,,,,,,,,,,•..CrTrvWR"rFM ^ �$ � •.. - �rffr i s,x c:: J,.7.a +,�, a rfrY' r' 3ca., "s'wt v v �E g S �' ' atife i n on,98f02 699 ` hF t ti�K f��Y� ri.,' t 4 L▪ .�A;�+� t... � - 4 Vt . ,ti 7.•.N t-.' �` "?•,,,,,....-.,`fir .•t. .r' at t 63285 81 � 1. Y' , s- rt v 3 sc,' ,: ,,s 'C. s • a e/206.3249530 " `.t ,_+�, "} s � '', A.` ,�- .�, L , +fix Ly i.7 • .w� � 3�4�r �;,�, w` .�i•�u ,fir r ".tK• 'f �t. C'�«. r• x P,' �r.r w"�,: : - ., , C.• h', ?°Mi k r•1� <'iA,�i '�".tt'•k :'r' t X' au ti he t'4>` y{' r' �'r �i � � , r4.. t e 201 Jaa1 ,A enu 5b 04° � .-,. t. ? a Y; F,:r WW1+ s a �.:' a r ; t t.,� 3.•,i' t▪ '�! ve r r.TY .pe ,- ' -Y:: �' i '!-. i. kkfilar d Wa . 9935243431 a '�*. 4 i» , ,` 7','r Y ` 2 t +. �,• ..p, t �yt f. ', ::' .y t, fi'•x, w-Mft: ;▪ srk+ .ter„ '':N} r. " c't' f < •+ y\' k':. 'wsi . _a> 09b,4 03.r t'1� i_ i,�p `,tr tt,, �r�;. `?�t f ""ri`.•' k°",�vW""�'`. `tt.'1 .f'•.' F. it, �`5�• l f ►" �h" - „p "`'t' r ''�a' ''1 ..., ej'la 9d 4 ": ,t. '` +� �h aY, i„:r ,� .`.; s.�,o-�: r ..t:: t#v a* r t t r' ., n •�ir :,r^s�'! •..' 'draw �g z S r. Y c.��w+" 1 s'�"iry yFxY.^ zt t 4 t �ir'{+ �� Yy �y� { ..tc?��'4Rr s �«C "u {f� �$ h. ?4r 0.�'`' `"r 't I•�c 7 ' t "a r� ,fit . SO'l�nJ�l i e� ,tit.:, ,S��^�1 �7y�.t �� +,`U,�g` �f,�e;',i''.��} ��a'-�,+�as� i`'• ar'r'ra."�i�,`�� "� �',j�;�s�a �'t s a "°vr,; rt�� �°`"� • -r/An i5e4� !': '99ti =2 3 �.-7 '' yTth..: m.ti ?<''p'`.i... P '",. -k -1, v'�M ''a ,'`�. �' .n"`a.1- �'ff,'- bs�" . -.. :Y. p`'�.+k:41-": 1... i�,a.. ' "x ro r„ '�ii• 'x+• - v...5 rd✓,•,P+"rr ;f,,;;i:r .a �' �.Y tfi + a'�'i� -rY#. -. ` fipa' ' t�P' . Fa 907''27621 ,.3: n'` :,• r N �.. i '''• to y .",� � , 1• , � �• •;•,xd :�>c�3 v.- - . ,•, 6 7475 • , '- 'ri'{ wa 4Lire h• 4e'k j • e it,..* .*., ? !�,, ,, B.• l ,f t y rr-4„. _tv� qS J,t, r r, r a k s y.` xa ? }' =fit Yt 7$ �•. 5r'. x- . : t Y aV ,�� .� p i 5t L f1 r •abs l y . Five Ce tefp '''.• D•'. ' Say f= d0 . w %� , 1 k « F' ,. '; s'f• < �'",F1t •�',.�r.,,, ,, " ,„ .i, 5 t , 7k . .a�, ^+K',�„p••.. r , .'1"t a„,., t' ''t "r' •.r 3 u .�, i t .t:i �.1. '.rr ya . s?takt7�o C71MJo 970'�=86 r r , 4 �r "�k 'ram * ,k 4s�« n i •a>..'s,, r' r' F rl » ^ 1�,.� s s, twn., y,c v. ,i 9t. .°'a iv'�'4i' kuo'4t�. y,.;:. ° .i,"r '� 1. , 't.'".!,,.:''-tm ( a-', . 03620$91 x7, r� mo s t ?, v i Y D� r 1 f t r P f r, `'rr }y{-k71t3�`` , _i �'Fw i f-'st,r v t'" G,< .r t T t u, `{ F ,, v r t) M:"A !r -'., . '' ^P .",....; ' .t4• a k t.. is f.'• J,j. K.• 'r r. ll rww>' 8d a�'.-..;.--, -,' '' .- xi';• : �,jc-,, -,- ,:ii 4 Jr YP,,+ v ;mo'+ t�„.,'�.-, 'fin f ''•H,t t�''y,�e' -x J • ''" 4 rAT. �; y�,.''Ryt.' T tr2y .8� b ly,y. ..f- 7 .Y• .,F) 1 n�- ',� iJ'' t,1" G ry Yi. SM1 L -••r ;• f f,+2,=1;,.r • �R •• • iL 144., ,...rid iiJi U•M i 1 •Sourro-:Thee Sfreet l5ult2 20-.4 t c w+y I. • a . Sr -,f`a " 1 �T s z , k t•;, s{,, F'y�n., i " e' >,7' } if . aLR±y 'i` �.. t ite' -;,...,„'„:„,'IN Y�1a `' ;�a9 r s;Jp. ( ,••.,4- Hono/u�u,Hawaii'68133-4.328 i '. tF Y r4w- #s. M1' + T=�,,'. F Q N ".. 'r. ..,K } a+ • t S� .x t fi_ y fi+ Fax 808.52i 8876, ,."9 ;k a fir.:' a <'�r r AA C< :xk£ <$�1 �* ,, �:,Nr r �r r r i.:s 'u.rw f .•1," , l'3:-' "f't r''''w is :' �• .¢ 7 j �^S�'-a`„-Y kt, ",�' !y r u k ti ; t°, i" `�s .M �Px'x^nr., Te1808521r5955 •` r4,r•. W" ,,'F _ s ' ,+t .,n+ "{a"'' • <xa „1.' S y,,,,,,, z n '• t F �R at! 'IA..'" c ry. !F t a s a ur, ,8�'• �` ' •r ,•' • ,'$�<,4 'v w"L„' .,d",�F" _ . z t,^�t qY* .'t ` � ;1� •k"-!w y .R,i�a , r,s iy� -4 f�"'" �. �� �i''.�r,r -- ` '353 5aclamfitors'-1• r•5ultt�•11� • 1: i;."•:;' 1.1'• �ii:`,' �-,'".C3't• a`,1'' .. `f7'''kk-.'.:,� i •�tt `''r .w .. I "flis�st..'. ' '! •t i;: •a ti; 91:5 .,,ep;5,- - ,.,,, .p. Y"st,q,,44,-�A0 Q 3" +,1 '"•a. r'f •r �""a�'y ,py ,;� -'r +, i +�i :nmw, n"t:' S^'.{.Y�' :*a San Francisco;C-'lifomfa 941113624 .v ' ,t4 �r +.• c ,v ,h �'' e '''_ ,,. ,� n. rFiX 41539i.12 6- ,lt v rt..,,,,;• . �` r;« L`,`. x��°��y `"1"+, S " ?el 415.391 188f ' t ti S`• 7""w'. 7 r`' i w Ayo y s� a T a• _ ` i h s,�' y .w;•,..�4••' tr?..'.1 I �: m '"t,4,e .,•.*1:44tt• rt ' -i#.1wL",4.i!}< S ,4`f•,i. �.,�Y ) ,y,. , i�,ti) ..,. .. .: kM= 'S-v { +-•+,"A ; 17 "'i'r .rT, .•` t ai L\.� 4t.. ! {,v al" .. ,..One World Trade.Center,Suite23 '1 f. . `. �.. + r t ,� � tri a- , wr •a. ��+yti,,. ., aktttac .;_ ' • + y ' N. rf ,°r "Yr�� ,rx .n.''''t E' 1,ys, i r+ �; '� �s �-,t,-7F� y SS¢b hh Long Beach,California 90831 2300- x '} ? w v - k , c,,, •t• �, t i.' 4, +a � Nr y, ;, s.tfi „ Fax 310.495 6361<` s; ,: .s�;• �>artl �°`'�.. ,My��rS . .�+�' �:.N 1 � �, �� • f ;a y� 4h`� y� r`s 1.5,�,;•h Fax 310.4 5.636 + r a4 , �" , � � , +r,*�, $.tv � 1 a say ,..'Ixti� �'s"t 0,a, •y ',L, `� �S-t' r ti..n r�.,�7 ft t - ,t'' .a,r + 1-; a .r, ,,, Ft .., • t•S ''� ff. :t, rN '.'6• �^"•�. �t R.'r fi t ef.}t,y-r i.. ,.r. •4F� `t y d• 3wr, 501 l est'Broadwa;Suite 800 " r s a, r .p S a +r 3 { gf S�J•2 1 - `i fin, + ZS 1' , Y o'Ml` ti- 'dx 4• y 4 .ri •�`i. r"' San Dfego;California 92101 3546 a a< t � zt ''�' F1e t y afc'' ��5 : >er �� c w r , f 4> '1st r yr��a r " ti hi #r '�Lrn + t 9 +'::r `FaX 619.231.9754 3 �� ➢ . . 11 # s�+ te 33 r Tef• 619.2307252 � •t t k • • • 5 Hart Crowser de Mexico, S.A. de C-V E fie3r5 ' y▪'''�.2� § W r •d s'''r, .,ks.;4a t t '" } ` z 1 .'t , u d -�„ s 4?; fir. , olr jx Sf :`.'t . •si , Cale C o'wser e 32 v�i�bv c4,[ 0,1i r+y , i f , 4 '^ip� *Art.:...''' .r Co i Hf ddromo Condesa r f'Y , .,+, �. t 1 *, r r 'a. `• '. t ' P �l;. s s} �▪ a;t C v r e ' a; • t +i C f 06170 ME'6 C D F v :.. �;tp`• '' .;w t }, t ra+ +k� l�a '1 c "`** `t' Far 0617, 1�55•o� � ; ,▪ ,:.;, fir,' '',, ,, 4 Nt. +.t +? �,i'P��ti - ;+ • t.. tttwas r Y, 3 i Tel 525.2771155 + f t � k ;. t`,'' �s i 1� Ac ; � , } ant ▪ • _ S' ,•• ''4,ti? • ¢•, •a'k r .•, �, + `,u.,• tr4Villq s.k ..'4 r, f1 ''.,ti.l4 4;4a t.. n 1 Pincock,Allen&Holt: '. ;,r`-. ra /'F '1` `` ..' a14h<u it, • * ,, ` .--,'" ,,• A Division of Hart Cro a•Inc >�� `fir , '.3'a :+� toe n ;� i -, 4 f ' , a. t ,,s `s kbi h`. e'.. 1' 5{xr c 1 t{r s ' 1 •274 Union Boulevard,Su1 ;200s '� r;" x� c � �, � 1y° ^s r. r =,ma.s Lakewood Colorado 802281835 ,E t , `" • i • `•f T.. } r�•� ' Fax 303:9878907 s+rr r ',motif �� ,f4 a.rr ° 5,"dj '�,' R , w , ; "„t` � ��,44b�"ct;s< Te1303.9879 50 * h .. t d▪4, Y' F$, r tf'r r :• J v✓ ..e,p4. "v d t t u a �" + a:4 ,,'�+� .'' tr_+,'•�v jr` ��i2n"".'.•ti` ,I'' •° i+e'a r . + L rt, - '!`,t,i. "- fi g CP+� 9i. / .yfn •"�, '.N y it t y sa•'- ,a`9?,.. - w .v '4;`" '''' �+" �.. f fiv�es� • S r 'i f �•fi'$� r .fEuc i1SF.• •t'+ iCf', kJ Tit , ^' + yf yi a�' -'�+ .4 47,• t..+ ;y t rr i [ 1 u aa..c ,', .A' ,` sz'r`L a,�r k x !att V � H}' s „.r„ :4- r i � �y * ., y 4 t r �''� • �4 s ix `y,' � . . ' rd'x�3 '�i .1 ,�c f1�:'r r• . • <rty,.,.,t$"" `� �, t 4 y+u,7,. Sty t � "r f.q'4t opt ^'^V 'T'fli f J i 6 j '•' r '• h '•..., ..t,,,��J' �.ytYt . ',, r 2 4, ' t t�r 'ifo°e -1,•, .•. -r.',"".At:;: y'Yr- ,� .,y •y r ru*knsr.t ,i..4i fy,,�� • inted on led stock with ��� wraste using vegetable-based inks�o post consume/l r{= " �''�k'.4.-t 3 4 t Y �^�c,� r . r «. a v'^''1,. s. ,t^ z 4' '+ tc r�S`Bk- e f'r� 'h'�'�il+#e? "" r> ''^cSf- 111,r HARTCROWSB? Hart Crowser,Inc. 1910 Fairviewiew Avenue East Seattle,Washington 98102-3699 Fax 206.328.5581 3 Earth and Environmental Technologies Tel206.324.9530 J-4329 December 21, 1995 Mr. Bill Shinpaugh Manager DEVELOPMENT PLANNING Projectg CITY OF RENTON Kenworth Truck Company 10630 NE 38th Place Jt1N 2 u 1999 Kirkland, WA 98083 RECEIVED Re: Geotechnical Engineering Design Study Proposed Research and Development Building Expansion Renton, Washington Dear Mr. Shinpaugh: This letter report presents our geotechnical engineering g g recommendations for design and construction of the proposed Kenworth Truck Research and Development Addition at the PACCAR site in Renton, Washington. The information in this report is organized as follows: ► Our Understanding of the Project; ► Scope of Work; 1 ► Limitations of Our Work; ► Subsurface Conditions; ► Geotechnical Engineering Conclusions and Recommendations; ► Recommendations for Additional Geotechnical Services; and ► Appendices Addressing Field Exploration Methods and Laboratory Testing. 1 Seattle•Tacoma•Richland•Anchorage•Portland•Denver•Honolulu•San Francisco•Long Beach•San Diego•Mexico City Ern Lr Kenworth Truck Company J-4329 December 21, 1995 Page 2 OUR UNDERSTANDING OF THE PROJECT R&D Building to Be Expanded Our understanding is based on information from Arnold Lorvick of Pacific Engineering Technologies. We understand that the R&D building will be expanded roughly 40 feet south (see Figures 1 and 2). Maximum column loads will be 38 kips. The plans for the existing building, supplied by PACCAR, indicate that this structure is supported on 65- foot-long timber piles with capacities of 13 to 30 tons. We understand the existing building floor slab is an 8-inch-thick structural slab. We understand that the proposed floor slab for the addition will have an average pressure of 250 to 350 psf. SCOPE OF OUR WORK Our scope of work for this study included: ► Reviewing available existing subsurface explorations for current facility; ► Drilling one hollow-stem auger boring to a depth of about 98 feet; ► Completing geotechnical engineering analyses; and ► Producing this geotechnical engineering design report. LIMITATIONS OF OUR WORK Hart Crowser completed this work in general accordance with our proposal dated March 22, 1995. We performed this work for the exclusive use of the Kenworth Truck Company, and their design consultants for specific application to this project and site location. We completed this study in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical practices for the nature and conditions of the work completed in the same or similar localities, at the time the work was performed. We make no other warranty, express or implied. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS We assessed subsurface conditions based on one boring completed for this study designated HC-1 and two borings completed by others for the existing facility (see Figure 2). Subsurface soil conditions interpreted from these explorations and soil properties i . 1 NIX 11 71 Kenworth Truck Company J-4329 December 21, 1995 Page 3 I '° inferred from the field and laboratory tests formed the basis for developing the foundation design, and construction recommendations contained within this report. The nature and extent of variations between the explorations may not become evident ,� until construction. If variations then appear evident, it will be necessary to re-evaluate 1 the recommendations of this report. Details of the conditions observed at the boring I. locations are shown on the logs included in Appendix A and should be referred to for specific information. 21 Soils Observed at Addition Location Consistent with PACCAR Site Alternating and interbedded layers of loose to dense sand or soft to stiff silt, clay, and peat underlie the expansion to depths of about 80 to 85 feet. Figure 3 presents a generalized subsurface profile at the site. ■ The soil stratigraphy at the proposed building addition location is similar to that across the PACCAR site and can be divided into four groups, listed in order of increased depth: ► Upper Interbedded Soil. This material consists of alternating layers of loose to medium dense sand, very soft to medium stiff silt, organic silt, and peat to depths of 60 to 65 feet. This material would be responsible for any settlement of grade- supported structures. In boring HC-1 we observed a significantly thicker layer of very soft silt with peat than was observed by others in previous borings for the existing building. ► Intermediate Sand. This material is 4 to 10 feet thick across the site. It consists of dense to very dense sand with varying silt contents, and occasional lenses of organic silt. The unit is thinnest beneath the proposed building addition. ► Compressible Silts and Clays. This material is 15 to 25 feet thick and consists of stiff to hard, silty clay, sandy silt, silty peat, with occasional silty sand layers. This material would also be responsible for any settlement of grade-supported structures. ► Deep Sand. We encountered the top of this unit at a depth of 80 to 82 feet or an elevation of -52 to -54 feet at boring HC-1. It consists of medium dense to very dense, slightly silty to silty sand. S 1 NB Kenworth Truck Company J-4329 December 21, 1995 Page 4 Groundwater Observed at Depths of 2 to 5 Feet We encountered groundwater at a depth of 5 feet in boring HC-1 at the time of drilling. From our work at other areas of the PACCAR site, the near-surface groundwater level generally is higher in the late spring and mid-winter and lower in the late summer and early fall. However, it must be noted that fluctuations in the level of the groundwater occur due to variations in rainfall, temperature, and other factors. Summary of Chemical Analysis The upper 20 feet of cuttings from our soil boring were segregated from the remainder of the cuttings since they were the most likely portion of the soil column to be environmentally affected. The upper 20 feet of cuttings were placed in a drum, sampled, and moved to the south part of the site pending test results. The remainder of the cuttings were placed in three drums which were also moved to the south half of the site. The analytical results on a composite sample of the upper 20 feet of cuttings are (see Appendices C and D): ► Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (by Washington State Method WTPH-HCID): 530 and 650 mg/kg for composite and duplicate sample; nearly all of the TPH was quantified as oil; diesel was not detected above the detection limit of 20 mg/kg. ► Total Metals: 14 mg/kg of arsenic, 53 mg/kg of chromium, and 83 mg/kg of lead, all less than site clean-up action and hot spot action levels; and ► PCB compounds were less than detection limits. All drill cuttings (including those from depths greater than 20 feet) were placed in Land Treatment Unit 19. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS This section of the report presents our geotechnical engineering recommendations for the design and construction of the proposed expansion. We have developed our recommendations based on our current understanding of the project and on our subsurface observations. If the nature or location of the construction is different than we have I .. i NV All Kenworth Truck Company J-4329 December 21, 1995 Page 5 li assumed, Hart Crowser should be notified so we can change or confirm our recommendations. The following sections include general major headings that address geotechnical issues at the site. Minor subheadings introduce specific topics. The recommendations provided should be incorporated by the structural engineer into the foundation plans for the structure. :1 General Foundation Considerations Based on our experience at the site, a preload would probably be required for a shallow foundation system to be feasible. A preload is not a viable option because of the close proximity of the addition to the existing structure, i.e., a preload could induce downdrag on the existing structure's piling in turn causing settlement. Consequently, we focused our design study assuming that a pile foundation will be required. 1 The existing structure is supported with 65-foot-long driven timber piles. In our opinion, augercast piles are the most suitable pile type for this project. We considered driven timber piles but feel driven piles may generate potentially damaging vibrations during pile installation to the adjacent existing building. The one disadvantage of using augercast ■ piles is the disposal of potentially contaminated soils should they be encountered during pile installation. Based on assumed floor slab loading conditions of 250 psf, we determined that settlements of a slab-on-grade could be between 2 to 3 inches. In addition, the loads for a slab-on-grade may induce damaging settlements to the existing structure. Therefore, we recommend that the floor slab be designed as a structural slab. Site Preparation and Grading Initial site preparation should include stripping of all asphalt and miscellaneous debris. We make the following recommendations for site preparation in the building and/or parking areas: j ► For a structural slab, compact the exposed subgrade if possible to a condition that will support the temporary load of fresh concrete. Any unusually soft areas may need to be overexcavated and backfilled with structural fill as detailed in the Structural Fill section; I 1 NW AIM Kenworth Truck Company J-4329 December 21, 1995 Page 6 4 ► In pavement areas, compact the exposed subgrade to a dense, non-yielding condition. The subgrade should be proof-rolled and any soft areas overexcavated, and backfilled with compacted structural fill; ► Fill the site to final grade with structural fill where required as described under the Structural Fill section; and ti ► During periods of wet weather, limit equipment traffic on subgrades to reduce potential for disturbance. Pile Foundation Design—Augercast Piles We determined the vertical compressive, uplift, and lateral capacity for 16- and 18-inch- diameter augercast piles. The bearing layer previously used for the existing timber piles thins out from a thickness of 10 feet at the existing building to about 4 feet beneath the proposed expansion. We estimate that piles tipped at an elevation of -35 to -36 feet t, under a column load of 38 kips could settle up to 1 to 2 inches. This settlement would result from the relatively thin thickness of bearing layer and the underlying compressible silt, clay, and peat layers. Piles embedded 7 to 8 feet into the deeper sand unit (tip 3 elevation of-60 feet) should settle less than 1 inch under the design load of 38 kips. Vertical and Uplift Pile Capacity 1,.. The allowable vertical compressive and uplift capacities for the two different diameter augercast piles tipped at elevation -60 feet is presented below in Table 1. i Table 1 - Summary of Allowable Vertical Compressive and Uplift Pile Capacities/Piles Tipped at Elevation -60 Feet • "� 6o Pile Size Allowable Vertical Allowable Uplift Capacity in Tons Capacity in Tons j16-inch augercast 60 30 18-inch augercast 75 40 1 The allowable compressive capacities assume a factor of safety of 2.5 and the allowable uplift capacities assume a factor of safety of 2.0. To obtain the allowable uplift capacity a center rebar will need to be placed to the tip of the pile. 1 Kenworth Truck Company J-4329 December 21, 1995 Page 7 Lateral Pile Capacity Lateral forces developed during an earthquake or as a result of wind or other forces can be resisted by the passive resistance of soil surrounding the piles and the capacity of the pile itself to resist lateral loads. This section presents a recommended method of analysis and appropriate soil parameters for laterally loaded vertical piles. Lateral resistance and deflections of pile foundations are governed primarily by the lateral 1 capacity of near-surface soils and the strength of the pile itself. The design lateral capacity of the vertical piles will depend, to a large extent, on the allowable lateral deflections of the piles. Use of the procedure discussed below, incorporating the design charts on Figures 4 and 5, will allow the structural engineer to estimate the pile deflection and moments within the pile at any point at or below the pile cap for a given loading. Development of lateral pile criteria requires an assumption of the degree of fixity at the pile head by the structural engineer. A pile is considered free-headed if the top is free to rotate. If the top of the pile is fixed against rotation by embedment in a pile cap that is sufficient to develop a fixed-end moment, the pile is considered restrained and fixed-headed. We expect that the piling would be structurally connected to the pile cap and therefore fixed to a great degree against rotation. We recommend that the structural engineer evaluate the degree of fixity and then linearly interpolate between results outlined from Figure 4 (true fixity at head) and from Figure 5 (true free-headed condition). In addition to the pile head fixity condition, the following information is required to determine lateral pile deflections and moments: ill aNW LI 4 Kenworth Truck Company J-4329 December 21, 1995 Page 8 Moment and Deflection Equations: '- Free-Headed Condition Fixed-Headed Condition r. AY = AyPLrT3+BYMXXT2 Y = AYPXXT3 EI EI EI iiiiii M = Am P T + Bni M M = Am Px.x T r Where: Y = Deflection at any point at or below the pile cap, A:- M = Moment at any point at or below the pile cap, Pxx = Shear applied to the pile at pile cap (x-x plane), pti Mxx = Moment applied to the pile at pile cap (x-x plane), AY'BY = Deflection coefficients from Figure 4 or 5, 1-, Am,Bm = Moment coefficients from Figure 4 or 5, EI = Flexural stiffness of the pile, A.,. El ids T = Relative stiffness factor = nh 314 4,„- nh = Coefficient of variation of horizontal subgrade reaction, in pounds per cubic inch, 2T = Assumed depth to point of zero deflection. i . 1 A ILr Kenworth Truck Company J-4329 December 21, 1995 Page 9 Ease of horizontal subgrade reaction, nh, is related to the stiffness and density of the soil. The soil above about 2T (2 times the relative stiffness factor) usually controls the lateral capacity of the pile. For the existing fill and very soft silt encountered in this zone, we estimate an appropriate value of nh to be 8 pounds per cubic inch. 1 The coefficient of variation of horizontal subgrade reaction should also be modified for pile group effects. Table 2 outlines the recommended reduction factors depending on pile spacing. Table 2 - Pile Group Reduction Factors for Coefficient of Variation of Horizontal Sub grade Reaction 4 Pile Spacing in Direction of Subgrade Reaction Reduction Loading D = Pile Diameter Factor (R) 8D 1.00 6D 0.70 4D 0.40 3D 0.25 For the pile to develop fixity, it is generally considered that a total embedment of at least 4T (four times the relative stiffness factor) must be attained. With 4T or greater embedment the ultimate resistance to an applied lateral load is governed primarily by the strength characteristics of the pile and not the strength of the soil. In contrast, should the pile be embedded to a depth of only 2T or less, the ultimate resistance to lateral loads would be governed primarily by the strength of the soil with the pile acting as a rigid member (or pole). An embedment of between 2T and 4T would be considered an intermediate case, i.e., the ultimate lateral loading is dependent on both the soil and the pile strength. Augercast Pile Installation We make the following recommendations for augercast pile installation: ► Pile spacing should be no less than about three pile diameters center to center; I I 1 1 NW NI Kenworth Truck Company J-4329 December 21, 1995 Page 10 q - ► Piles installed within a 24-hour period should have a minimum spacing of 5-pile diameters; and YEN ► To evaluate augercast pile installation, the contractor should be required to provide a �. pressure gage in the grout line between the pump and the auger and some means of 8 determining the quantity of grout used per pile (stroke counter on the grout pump). In many cases, the augering action may tend to disturb the soils at the bottom of the drilled hole, resulting in decreased end bearing capacity. To reduce the negative effects of this disturbance, we recommend that the pile contractor be required to rotate his auger following ..,4 pumping of the first few cubic feet of grout and prior to auger withdrawal. This will mix any loose cuttings at the bottom of the hole with the cement, thus developing the end bearing capacity. s, Proper installation of augercast piles requires the appropriate care and experience on the part of the contractor. We recommend that all foundation contractors bidding on the project be 1 prequalified and be able to demonstrate proficiency and experience. 21 1 Pile Installation Observations 9 We recommend that the installation of all piles be observed by a geotechnical engineer or experienced technician. The observer would evaluate the contractor's operation, and collect and interpret the installation data. By careful observation of pile installation operations, we believe it is possible to confirm the predetermined penetration depth, monitor variations in subsurface conditions, and verify that the require penetration depths into the bearing layer are 0 achieved. In our opinion, such field decisions regarding installation would result in an economical and satisfactory pile foundation system. Field observations are particularly critical during the installation of augercast piles. As the completed pile is below the ground surface and cannot be observed prior to construction, judgement and experience must be used to aid in determining the acceptability of the pile. This not only includes our experience, but that of the augercast pile contractor who is familiar with such installations. We would utilize our experience with normal operating _ procedures from previous augercast pile installations as well as those established by the '' contractor for the current job, including installation sequence, auger withdrawal rate, '' grouting pressure, and quantity of grout used per pile. Variations from the established pattern, such as low grout pressure or excessive settlement of grout in a completed pile would make the pile susceptible to rejection. C 4 4 a, Ir ,,,,, Kenworth Truck Company J-4329 December 21, 1995 Page 11 A Potentially Contaminated Soil May be Encountered during Installation. Soil cuttings ... il generated during the installation of augercast piles at the site may be contaminated based on our previous experience at the PACCAR site. We recommend that cuttings be evaluated in the field to assess the potential level of contamination and disposal or treatment methods. See the subsequent Environmental Considerations below for more information. 41 Floor Slab Design As discussed previously, we recommend the floor slab be designed as a structural slab. A slab-on-grade could produce excessive settlements, induce downdrag on piles, and cause damaging settlement to adjacent structures. The structural slab should be underlain by a minimum 4-inch thickness of drainage fill. This layer serves as a capillary break and is intended to reduce the potential build-up of hydrostatic pressures below the slab. The floor slab subgrade should be prepared as described in the Site Preparation section prior to placement of capillary break layer. n, Drainage Considerations 0 We make the following recommendations concerning drainage: ► Provide a minimum of 4 inches of compacted free-draining (less than 3 percent passing - number 200 sieve based on the minus 3/4-inch fraction) well-graded sand or sand and gravel below the floor slab as a capillary break layer. If structural fill is needed beneath the slab to bring the site to grade, the structural fill can be considered a capillary break, if it meets the specifications. ► Provide minimum 4-inch-diameter perforated pipe surrounded by at least 6 inches of free draining, well-graded sand or sand and gravel as perimeter drainage around the building. Connect the perimeter drain to the capillary break layer. ► Provide drainage for any low areas, which may occur as a result of landscaping or other reasons. ► Grade the site in such a waythat surface water ater will not pond near the structure. , _ ► Slope roof drains to a suitable outlet away from the proposed building. Do not connect the roof drains to the foundation drainage.1'M. .,_ It ILr 4 Kenworth Truck Company J-4329 December 21, 1995 Page 12 0 Utility Construction The main concern with utility construction is the potential for additional settlement from consolidation of the very soft silt with peat. This settlement can occur if underground utilities are located at a depth where their weight and/or that of backfill affects consolidation. We have no information to date on the anticipated depth of utilities. Excavation for utilities could also encounter potentially contaminated soils. If contaminated soils are encountered in utility excavations we recommend that they be evaluated during construction to determine appropriate use or disposal actions (see Environmental Considerations below). Backfill of utility trenches should be placed in accordance with recommendations in the following section. Structural Fill 3 The f 11 w'0 o tng paragraphs contain general recommendations regarding selection, placement, and use of structural fill. Geotextile Fabric 4 Utility trenches in native soil on the PACCAR site are typically lined with a geotextile fabric and backfilled with import soil in accordance with an agreement with the Washington State Department of Ecology. We recommend checking with PACCAR on their preferred method of utility construction for this project. Selection The suitability of site soils or imported soils for use as structural fill is a function of the gradation and moisture content of the soil when it is placed. Soil with more than about 5 percent fines cannot be consistently compacted to a dense not-yielding condition when the moisture content is significantly above or below the optimum. Structural fill must also be 4• free of organic and other deleterious debris. On-site soils which are either native or industrial fill and are reused as structural fill need to be covered with at least two feet of cap material. A cap material is either import structural fill and/or pavement section. I I''' I 4 a' Kenworth Truck Company J-4329 December 21, 1995 Page 13 4 Placement Y Before fill control can begin, the compaction characteristics must be determined from representative samples of the structural fill. Any material to be used as structural fill should be sampled from the site or from the supplier's pit to determine the maximum dry density Iand gradation prior to placement of fill. A study of the compaction characteristics should include determination of optimum and natural moisture contents of these soils at the time of placement. Any fill placed beneath pavement areas should be placed as structural fill. Structural fill should be placed using the following criteria: ► Loose lift thickness should not exceed 10 inches; 1 ► Structural fill should be compacted to a minimum of 92 percent of the modified Proctor maximum dry density (as determined by ASTM D 1557 test procedure) below pavements except the upper 2 feet immediately beneath the pavement section which should be placed sa at a minimum 95 percent of the modified Proctor maximum dry density; ► Moisture content of the fill should be maintained within two percent of the optimum moisture. Optimum moisture is the moisture content corresponding to the maximum Proctor dry density; 3 Use of On-Site Soils Our exploration and borings completed by others encountered about 5 feet of primarily granular fill across the site. The granular soils were typically silty and contained organic material and occasional construction debris. Soil containing organic material is not suitable for use as structural fill. If on-site soils are unsuitable or construction activities take place during periods of wet Iweather, imported soils should be used as structural fill. ► For import site soils, use a clean, well-graded sand and gravel with less than 5 percent by 1 weight passing the No. 200 sieve (based on the minus 3/4-inch fraction); ► In wet subgrade areas, use a soil with a gravel content (material coarser than a U.S. No. 5 4 sieve) of at least 30 to 35 percent may be necessary; I I I `r Kenworth Truck Company J-4329 December 21, 1995 Page 14 During extended periods of dry weather, imported fill may contain as much as 30 percent fines, as long as moisture content is controlled within 2 percent of optimum and the material is not used where free-draining material is required. Pavement Design and Construction We recommend that suitable soil in a dense non-yielding condition underlie all paved areas. They may consist of: ► Undisturbed, in-place dense natural soil ► Existing soil that is currently loose to medium dense but is compacted in-place to a dense condition (per structural fill criteria); or ► Dense structural fill. We recommend the following: ► After the site is prepared, provide the following minimum pavement sections: • 2 inches of asphalt concrete over 4 inches of crushed rock for light traffic or parking areas; and • 3 inches of asphalt concrete over 6 inches of crushed rock in driveway and parking areas that will accommodate heavy trucks. ► Compact crushed rock to the degree recommended herein for structural fill. P g These pavement sections assume a properly prepared subgrade, free of loose, soft, or organic material. It is important to note that a granular fill layer with occasional organic material exists across the site to a depth of about 5 feet below existing ground surface. If left in place, decomposition of the organic matter may cause settling that may require long-term maintenance of the pavement. It has been our experience that proof-rolling with overexcavation of near-surface soft soils prior to pavement construction works well. As an alternative, however, all soils containing organics may be overexcavated and replaced with compacted structural fill. This would reduce the potential for long-term settlement and I I 4 M ff. 1r Kenworth Truck Company J-4329 December 21, 1995 Page 15 pavement distress associated with the settlement. However, overexcavating of all soils a. containing organics may not be economically feasible. Seismic Design Considerations An in-depth seismic study was beyond the scope of this study. However, sufficient design parameters can be estimated from other Hart Crowser seismic studies within the Puget Sound area. ,.,... The project site is located in a region subject to moderate earthquake activity (Zone III, r. UBC). Three earthquakes of a Magnitude 6.5 to 7.3 (based on Richter Scale) have been reported in northwest Washington since 1872. Response Spectra We understand that the Uniform Building Code's (UBC) normalized response spectra curves are the means of analysis for this project. The soil stratigraphy at the site is best modeled using a site coefficient equal to 1.5 (Soil I Type S3). The site is located in a Seismic Zone 3. Liquefaction NI Previous analysis completed for the Kenworth Truck Plant indicates that the PACCAR site is Y P not at significant risk for earthquake-induced liquefaction damage. Any liquefiable material at the PACCAR site would be loose sands in the Upper Interbedded Soils. Liquefaction analysis was previously performed for a magnitude 6.5 earthquake and a ground acceleration of 0.17g. We would anticipate under this magnitude earthquake that the pavements and utilities, could experience some damage from liquefaction-induced ground settlements. The damage from these settlements is not anticipated to be from the total settlements, but rather from the differential settlement common among isolated areas of liquefaction. Environmental Considerations All work performed within the boundaries of the PACCAR Renton site and below surface paving involving native soils/existing industrial fill must be performed by a qualified, 40- hour, trained personnel. Based on analytical results (see Appendices C and D) cuttings from L I Kenworth Truck Company J-4329 December 21, 1995 Page 16 boring HC-1, soil cuttings from either augercast pile construction or utility excavations, are suitable for placement on the site, north of the APA-line and below 1-foot of import structural fill or combination of import structural fill and pavements. We recommend PACCAR be consulted for their preferred method of dealing with potentially contaminated augercast pile cuttings and other excavated soils. 1 3 ADDITIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS Hart Crowser should be consulted during the remainder of the design phase to refine our recommendations as more information about project requirements becomes available. Recommendations: ► Provide Hart Crowser the opportunity for a general review of the final plans and specifications to verify that geotechnical recommendations presented herein were properly interpreted and implemented in the design and specifications. ► Retain Hart Crowser to provide geotechnical engineering services during construction phases of the work. This would include observation of the following: • Installation of augercast piles; • Evaluation of the suitability of on-site soils for use as structural fill; • Evaluation and placement of capillary break material; • Utility trench backfilling; • Assessment of pavement subgrades; • Evaluation of soil cuttings from augercast piles or site excavations to determine potential contamination levels and appropriate use and/or disposal; and • Other geotechnical considerations which may arise during the course of construction. The purpose of these observations is to determine compliance with the design concepts, specifications, or recommendations and to allow design changes in the event that subsurface conditions differ from that anticipated prior to the start of construction. I 4 4 - LI Kenworth Truck Company J-4329 December 21, 1995 Page 17 We trust this report will meet your immediate needs. Please call us if you have any Iquestions or if we can be of further assistance. Sincerely, HART CROWSER, INC. ?� Y ASJ��4/i �C. H/ti , jr' p �I 4 . , , 1�� 0 127870 O �' EXPIRES: ��6`91. ,bx,u,&ailli ',On C- JAMES H. KLEPPE, P.E. JOHN R. VERDUIN III, P.E. Principal Senior Project Engineer JHK/JRV:rah/sde PROPRESE.Ir Attachments: Figure 1 - Vicinity Map Figure 2 - Site and Exploration Plan Figure 3 - Generalized Subsurface Profile A-A' Figure 4 - Laterally Loaded Piles in Elastic Subgrade Deflection and Moment Criteria s Fixed-Headed Pile Condition Figure 5 - Laterally Loaded Piles in Elastic Subgrade Deflection and Moment Criteria 11 Free-Headed Pile Condition Appendix A - Field Exploration Methods Appendix B - Laboratory Test Program I Appendix C - Certificates of Analysis Analytical Technologies, Inc. Appendix D - Chemistry Laboratory Analytical Report Hart Crowser Chemistry Laboratory I Vicinity Map �r A I. ,..A . vST-1:.:. ,. /•/Ar' r [ ItF{ i t•.r. 1.1.1 IM MT. ST'Sr f ;: <D .o...,,... BEACH I q . ,,, ! N Iwo sr S s 5h. F' +y -r•[1,. KENNYDAL •• 1 xmo —y �` N rNl MC•V r 33 el51 i T 1• P Shy` I i I I.YI.'.-..I• �pTS, ST - I I): 'C�.• . .S I CO.rr.• TM ST " �PS� y4 ' LakeNIJIJ N nT» n :17: .„ IY -S.T: N' 4=NO-'39tn. _ .v __� _ __ --_-_ _-- __ __ _ _ — — _ _ __ ej P40YY �9J K,T` Y, " `\. srr"I srk[ •:�«+>I `� , Qa T�'a s hing ton ` glIr u "I" ^ e O.. .>f a '^ , `, �.ST _ �_,` I w( ATM ',01 .o m .i5! ' _ •• 4 `.,r r I NUr._Gl(5 5TIIII l e i ,i II i •. l •' \ '� i !L9 h , S eInl' �t .0 ,,„ Jr\l7 ,„ 1 Z i ,. ,i CRE SIGN ST 'ie ./©p©p� • +Y�'s��P r P !� _—__ __— — ____._ _ __ —__ I _ — Z w J.t' ; • NA2EL L ;, ST - �, '. .. S r z Mis 4�s� F� " c1J\PQ9 1 `we1 Z� r 5 w s e 1Q �' -Y• • Q �FOON MN ST. S .,r.000 ' 11't® r r` 1 f: v4 • O� .1�.,, �r� I ri .S alr Fb0NT41N ST .�T. .�;.. c �' 9_�' Z 1% T { T »[12TM •LE AWN $ t,w Sr 15M- . R W0' �S Q Is r. Ell_; �$T I • ,, 5T 'n rQ J� $.Ilil•r"� •T .:•-r sr , I >� N F © O S IISTNIn sr 1 $ 11$�• ' r '3'~ 's'7�- - : 5 N IISr" - I l7 t•.'" n Q ' /m s inrw �' a' •Nr I..u.tN , �''�.. fr. y b K. fr •.. s a " ST.. WA S • . >a' S ®Sr I P (:..ml.r S rr 11.�., S IIr.. Sf I `�' .[wrw C Tc •I� li• r.r» n 6'0�_ —��fT%I$>II) I��I .T '<—_n.»r V'/ L II9r»5 , f.1NrN -, h rTM REN+IIFON,•> hI \ '"�M A `•I20TA r q IT" _.-A sr �l c+ .111r o m >12p•rn i20..p 12 4 11 • 5 :III T - I f^ ' •� JQ, I $1 IST r " : > .�• e Q CS I '7Mu tTm Y �• I \ > �o a i a "s' 5 .22In15•,- +awl rry 1 ..o...[•f \N . +io YPi e 1 s u m)O\, ,. s.4;r . ! _ $ 123.0$7 �1\1 < .• \�, \\ m' ei dlfl Sr •o`e' r. MY•/•+O f•.al.! q3"oa <; �-�l Z1• 1110 I ST\\ I.t. •p s 12•rw I Sr r»tr it ` N T.• T __- 1 a 1' llllt»ST .. •u N —^-'.+• "'Renton sotnM `\ ; \. \\ ` t `yr" (t, a A '•( i hM �-T .IM.• � � 1 S sr N r..1 3 1 , zl I r n \ 9ry R [ '��e + S i� ' �T—I-r—I�a 'S.. t ;F A—LJ4r •JLLI1 ` - `• —— —a L' f Irrrw.lr V- I CI -' • • i Y.RIOM'^$ ` • '`IRr✓,• s•Irrw I . ,1:Ir .,. O ` ' N.S• �� N\ 4STS 150r" :°;ST I eflat» t4 O ',.; .... I `s 4.4 • � m� fTd w \ +C^ It IS11S _. em..A • ~NO-� At M• �. N • U_■.. l '` •i ri .•k, I-"_ EL, AIRPORT w `\I ' �„ r:�. u� 'rN. 0 '2 i I '1. fntfr(1 j 'a��v \[ ^ i . _ \C.br •r5 153.0 I 1 rt S TaIN= nr• . r •�,.' b Q fr.,.:' of <</l A. S ILrN 2's v _�� o.. �' �"! / 'a r�srt� KJNC 5 s v iiit,;:i7s._.iter.ite'lf.-::.4,.,:rt-sii.. 2ND •�o+�Q+'fiy \ilikal •L ��9d .' r.. ,:. .—., L-—s MIN_ f _ _ W'{ cP ►^)�i %, ��` �� i��\ r wr.IRS L .50..4. ..:'\ , IBLABM1;sr �'�� I ' $ 51 ..... . -�. ;\ RIVE' i,/ t EARLI t3t�l..„= , Al11 a> . • s, i• Ill r. :312::Hs'-'1' PE \y 6MdVGRTN`1� I f�+� f < f., _ 14e cas( co. .I 1 ' 1 I.. ; z - • 0 1/2 1 Scale in Miles F. i.s , N Alit" a HARTCROWSER J-4329 12/95 `\ Figure 1 I Site and Exploration Location Plan ` gNORTH 8TH STREET . (.. i A Y.1 -� X 1 -2 x x X x x Y x. a x w \ Existing Research and cDevelopment Building z x w _ cc ® B-1 111 f Q x x I Proposed Building Expansion r-- A' i Ix x x x z x X x i x x J Boring Location and Number 0 50 100 : — B HC-1 Hart Crowser — Current Study Scale in Feet ® B-1 Others — Previous Study A A' MIA Cross Section Location and Designation HI RTC?OWSER J-4329 12/95 .___ Note. Base map prepared from drawing developed by SSOE.Inc. 43 2 entitled Area A Existing Topography and Demolition Plan' undated. y. Generalized Subsurface Cross Section A-A ' A Proposed A Existing Building Addition 1-4 -41 -1 40 - - B-2 B-1 HC-1 Ground Surface 1 (33' SW) PI /��V& cj 3/23/70 ���� 3/23/70 V FILL -______- - 7 ATD 77,E 61 7 20 - � _ , Very soft SILT with PEAT t �, 3 - • Loose to dense. silty SAND with \ ` I occasional sandy SILT and PEAT • 2 = 6 7 � 0 �_ � — = 30 - Medium stiff to stiff PEAT � c —20 — Stiff SILT with interbedded silty SAND and PEAT = 20 — cv a) = 26 W �� M. 13 7l ��_ 7 - Very dense SAND and silty,gravelly SAND JSD/7 -40 - off Lenses of organic SILT _� �� SILT •] 44 — Jf Stiff PEAT = 41 _ �— �— ]P = 61' - -60 — Stiff SILT and CLAY 7/ = 62- 7 ______7 . -_____ �_ = 26 • - Very dense. silty SAND --50/5 —80 — --_ Note:Contacts between soil units are based upon interpolation between borings and Horizontal Scale in Feet represent our interpretation of subsurface conditions based on currently available data. 0 40 80 0 20 40 HC-1 Boring Number Vertical Scale in Feet (33' SW) Offset Distance and Direction in Feet Vertical Exaggeration x 2 Boring Location -I Standard Penetration Resistance in Blows per Foot A Water Level Ll HARTCRO WSLR J-4329 12/95 Figure 3 1 Laterally Loaded Piles in Elastic Subgrade Deflection and Moment Criteria Fixed-Headed Pile Condition (a) Deflection and Moment Coefficients 1 Deflection Coefficient. Ay .2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2.I I 1 • '/ 1 i T � i i .1,-- ' -- 2T 0 3 , ,1 1 3T I I i 4T �4 i 1 Moment Coefficient, Am —1 —0;8 —0.6 —0.4 —0.2 0 0.2 0.4 u, 1 I 1 I I .. .":1. . rt i I Thi \ I .1_ I i I Q_2'r a 2TI • I , 3T; i 1 3 i 1 4T1 1 I I I I I (b) Typical Deflection and Moment Curves II x Pxx Y M TPxx Pile Shear at Ground Surface 3; 1 7 T Relative Stiffness Factor i II I I A L Load Deflection Moment HARTCROWSER J-4329 12/95 Figure 4 - Laterally Loaded ^`les in Elastic Subg—de Deflection and Moment Criteria Free-Headed Pile Condition (a) Deflection and Moment Coefficients Deflection Coefficient (Ay ) Moment Coefficient (Am) -1 0 1 2 3 -C.1 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 I i 1 ' T i i .' , I T j I _' i . 4,: , C1 0 --..... i • T 2 ! r p '' I ./ a 2T • i / I Q. 2T o ! j 3/ o -+'' 3T 3 .r I I 3T ' I I I ; I 4/• ! / 4T I I 4T i , 5 I i i 5 1 Deflection Coefficient (BY ) Moment Coefficient (BM ) -1 0 1 2 3 -0.1 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 i - 0 I i .r•�.. 0 I 1 I I 1 J i I / ... T j I 1 T I I • ... i T 2 i i ..• I 1 p a2T t i 1 Q2T a) a� i 3T i ; � � I 3T f ' i i 4&5 •4 4T i i 4T [ j i ! 5 1 (b) Typical Deflection and Moment Curves Mxx Deflection Moment Pxx Pile Shear P x X at Ground Surface 11 X —X Mxx Pile Moment at Ground Surface E T Relative J Stiffness Factor ao A Ai I Loading J-4329 12/95 Figure 5 A Hart Crowser a, J-4329 APPENDIX A FIELD EXPLORATION METHODS .. . This appendix documents the processes Hart Crowser used in determining the nature of the soils underlying the project site addressed by this report. The discussion includes information on the following subjects: 6 ► Explorations and Their Location; ► The Use of Auger Borings; ► Standard Penetration Test (SPT) Procedures; and ► Use of Shelby Tubes. Explorations and Their Location Subsurface explorations for this project include one hollow-stem auger boring completed by Hart Crowser and two existing borings completed by others. The Hart Crowser exploration log within this appendix shows our interpretation of the drilling, sampling, and testing data. The depth where the soils change is indicated on the log. Note that the change may be gradual. In the field, we classified the samples taken from our exploration according to the methods presented on Figure A-1 - Key to Exploration Logs. This figure also provides a legend explaining the symbols and abbreviations used in the log. ILocation of Explorations. Figure 2 shows the location of explorations, located by hand taping or pacing from existing physical features. The method used determines the accuracy of the location of the explorations. The Use of Auger Borings One hollow-stem auger boring, designated HC-1, was drilled to a depth of 97.8 feet on April 25, 1995. The boring used a 3-3/8-inch inside diameter hollow-stem auger and was advanced with a truck-mounted drill rig subcontracted by Hart Crowser. The drilling was continuously observed by a Hart Crowser field representative. We prepared a detailed field log for the boring. The boring log is presented on Figure A-2 at the end of this appendix. i . Page A-1 ..„ Hart Crowser ' J-4329 1 Standard Penetration Test (SPT) Procedures This test is an approximate measure of soil density and consistency. To be useful, the results must be used with engineering judgment in conjunction with other tests. The SPT (as described in ASTM D 1587) was used to obtain disturbed samples. This test employs a standard 2-inch outside diameter split-spoon sampler. Using a 140-pound hammer, free-falling 30 inches, the sampler is driven into the soil for 18 inches. The number of blows required to drive the sampler the last 12 inches only is the Standard Penetration Resistance. This resistance, or blow count, measures the relative density of granular soils and the consistency of cohesive soils. The blow counts are plotted on the boring logs at their respective sample depths. Soil samples are recovered from the split-barrel sampler, field classified, and placed into water tight jars. They are then taken to Hart Crowser's laboratory for further testing. v In the Event of Hard Driving 1 Occasionally very dense materials preclude driving the total 18-inch sample. When this happens, the penetration resistance is entered on logs tl as follows: Penetration less than six inches. The log indicates the total number of blows over the number of inches of penetration. Penetration greater than six inches. The blow count noted on the log is is the sum of the total number of blows completed after the first six inches of penetration. This sum is expressed over the number of inches driven that ,,:z exceed the first 6 inches. The number of blows needed to drive the first six inches are not reported. For example, a blow count series of 12 blows for 6 inches, 30 blows for 6 inches, and 50 (the maximum number of • blows counted within a 6-inch increment for SPT) for 3 inches would be recorded as 80/9. II0 4 Page A-2 4 Hart Crowser J-4329 Use of Shelby Tubes To obtain a relatively undisturbed sample for classification and testingin P fine-grain soils, a 3-inch-diameter thin-walled steel (Shelby) tube sampler was pushed hydraulically below the auger. The tubes were sealed in the field and taken to our laboratory for extrusion and classification. Attachments: A-1 - Key to Exploration Logs A-2 - Boring Log HC-1 t i I I I 1 I i . Page A-3 6 0 Key to Exploration Logs Sample Description Classification of soils in this r.o_art is oaseu on visual field aria Ymoratiory :ose•vet ons rrnich hcluoe Oensitvjconsistenc/. 0 moisture condition. grain size. and plasticity estimates ana snould not De ':cnstrued to rnol•; ''eid nor IaooratOry testing unless presented herein. visual-manual classification methoas of .STM 0 2488 Here .sea as :n iaentificotion guide Soil descriptions consist of 'he ',illowina Density/consistency. moisture. :Dior, minor constituents. MAJOR CONSTiTUE>IT. 7cctiondi 'emcrks Density/Consistency * Soil density/consistency in Parings is related primarily to the Standard enetraticn Resis'cnce. Sod density/consistency in test Pits is estimated bored on usual ooservoUon and •s presentee parenthetically on the test pit logs. Stonaara Stcnoora approximate SAND or GRAVEL Penetration SILT or 'CLAY Penetration Sheor 0 Resistance (N) Resistance N1 Strength Density .n Slaws.-Foot Consistency in 3lows/Foot ,n iSF 1.4 <0.12 S Very loose 0 - 1 Very soft 0 - _ 4 Loose 1 — '3 Soft _ — 1 0.125- 0.25 Medium cense 10 - :0 Medium stiff 1 — , 0.25 - 0.5 Dense 30 - 50 Stiff 3 - 15 0.5 - 1.0 Very dense >5C Very stiff . '5 - 30 1.0 - 2.0 • •@ Hord >3r2i >2.0 it Moisture Minor Constituents Estimated Perceniaga Dry Little perceptible moisture . Not dentifiea in aescr Dtion 0 - 5 Damp Some perceptible moisture. orooaoly oelow optimum i Sligntly (covey. silt:. etc . 5 - 1-M'tMoist probably near optimum .moisture content I Clove,. ,illy, sonny. ?rdve,l? 12 - 30 'Net Much perceptible moisture. Drobooly above optimum ! •%try (clayey. slit+, e._.. 30 - 50 4 Legends i Test Symbols Sampling Test Symbols I Gs Grain Size Classification BORING SAMPLES � CN Consolidation ,-4., LJ Split Spoon TUU Trioxial Unconsolioatea _ndroined ElSheiby Tuoe TCU Triaxial Consolidated i;narained ni,: TCD Trioxial Consolidated Drcined ED Cuttings OU Unconfined Compression W Core Run DS Direct Shear ti- * No Sample Recovery K °ermeebility - P Tube Pushed. Not Driven PP Pocket Penetrometer _ TEST PIT SAMPLES I Approximate Comoresswe Strength in TSr 1. © TV Torvone $,. .. Grob (Jar) i Approximate Shear Strength in TSF u. 2 Bag I I CBR California Bearing Pa tic MD Moisture Density Pelct'cnsnip ShelbyE Tube F' . AL Atterberg Limits . I I 'Hater __ntent in Percent -- Groundwater Observations I 1 — Liau•d Limit jNatural p]] i l Plastic _,r^.t i ty✓�//i,J1tI1 Surface oeol I 1 PID Photoionizotion Reading CA Chemical Analysis {f Groundwater Level an Date i (ATD) At Time of Drilling Observation Well Tip or Slotted Section ! 1 u 1 ■s.?r II 0 Groundwater Seepece HARTCRON (Test Pits) J-4329 12/95 Figure A-1 1 —� Boring Log HC-1 STANDARD PENETRATION LAB Soil Descriptions Ground Surface Elevation ,n Feet 2E1.2 Depth RESISTANCE TESTS �n F�a; Sample • Blows per Foot � I 2 5 ICI 20 50 100 2 inches of ospholt concrete over verb TJ _ II u. dense, silty, very sandy GRAVEL. I II (FILL) = S-t _. _ • I -PP=0.35. 7TSF Very soft, wet, gray S;LT ,vith —5 I =tinterbedded seams of PEAT. _ pro ;i - •S-2 'I - / —10 l S-3 -15 _ I, I I,I C 5-4 I Ill 1 I r I III! I I.8 i., Loose to dense, wet, 'gray, silty, medium I _ I III I to fine SAND with occcsional stringers. L - II II! II of PEAT. I 5_5 - I!: 4 -25 tI . _ _ _ I � l I I i 1l \ I t L S-6 _ i III !: ';'. 11 I F '30 7 Medium stiff to stiff, wet, brown, fibrous - II PEAT. S-7 _ - I _35 I! l •309 - Gravels? CI I ; — 4-inch-thick organic SILT layer. - S-8 0 4 • _40 - I li '`.°) • Stiff, wet, gray SILT with interbedded - S-g I P _ I \ • • •374 -PP=0.75 to 1.5 TSF silty SAND and PEAT. —45 • I TV=0.5 I _ I TV 5-10 0 - I • —50 5-11 6 _ -55 ( I I' II I. - A • - Ili ••177 S-t28 • -60 I Ill • I 5 20 • 50 100 • water Content Percent ` M it1. Refer to Figure A-1 for explanation of des�r.ptions = and symbols. HAI?TCROWS 2. Soil descriptions and stratum lines are in;e•oretive _ and actual changes may be gradual. ,J_4529 4/95 • 0.e r ' 3. Ground water level, if indicated, is at tine .if dr:11:no C (ATD) or for date spe 'ified. Level may . w-th time. Figure A-2 • 1/2 i Boring Log HC-1 0 STANDARD PENETRATION LAB Soil Descriptions Depth RESISTANCE TESTS 1 in Feet Somple ♦ Blows per Fo,• —60 1 2 5 '0 20 50 100 t = \ Very dense, wet, gray, slightly silty. _ i grovelly SAND. _ S-t3 - iI • >50/5 4 feet of heave. —65 I ; II (Stiff), wet, gray SILT with stringers of Ili organics. •5-14 - I'' I -AL. PP=0.5 5 feet of heave. —70 I TSF (Stiff), wet, brown, silty PEAT. _ i! `�\ •5-15 O. - /145 1 foot of heave. - I! —75 i (Stiff), wet, gray CLAY with rootlets and _ i truce stringers of slightly sandy SILT - S-16 , PI i' I I-AL. I, I I PP= .25 —80 1 to .5 - II A Very dense, wet, gray, silty to very silty _ I I TSF l; Tv=0.5 SAND with interbedded SILT and CLAY. TSF to - S-17 0 - I!i • • 0.7 —85 I - S-18 �i - ; . I I - l 1; Medium dense to very dense. Net. _ _ gray-brown, slightly silt✓, fine to medium SAND. - •S-19 " I 20 feet of heove. —95 ii Il 8 feet of heave. _ •S-20 - I • +50/5 Bottom of Boring at 97.9 Feet. l' Completed 4/25/95. —100 II !I —105 I I —110 - - l. II 1 —115 _ I —120 t 1 2 5 `J 20 50 100 v • water Conten! :n Percent 1. Refer to Figure A-1 for e'planation of descriptions and symbols. f I 2. Soil descriptions and ay oe lines ore interpretive H/IRTCRO .. v and octual changes moy be grladual. ME z , 3 Ground water level, if ind _:ted. •s at time of drilling 51, (ATD) or for date speciie: Level may vory with' time J-4329 4/95 7 ■ Blow count may not be r__ esent:t:ve due to heave Figure A-2 2/2 Y ::•y yz, t.., - * S•�Cr N.•,'-*<'i" '-..1!t,,x_,�Pam. • '..'. ,rv'ih:,r""SS :..k ty�1 y.• Y. 4+ C'- :'"••••tirM+?t l .4.,v,,f.�: 't 5t .a .'•:.. i✓ J Via✓ '+w'�r; , ..•t!F z'S' .4S,,•t v iii, •s :.:C'• r Y• `f a r° o r, aF y,ti 4 ti w` r k4 i �.Sli�'t•; r- Y.,ti. >ri i... t•4 ?? tX 4 <Y l w t'r r{) tF a � ��r �1v!�.� yam,. ��'p�} c a,.. Y a.kS"0,. e?Y. A-..e. 4.y4y• j�,F 1 y f},.' T.,,�e -r 5t��y ,1 ^r• ri,;. 3�r .tY" `� ^•�S_ M+a �rvj•• t•4• r~ c »'yv w�� '3✓.`. ''♦ y °f t X feet `.,1C i5l,s A_,.J tr 3f`.1 �'}'r'" ,,, :w �_. `�` . + rxd.':•A r rid N- ? y r t 3 t ��.- ) �• +� ,� r. '0Y. S,.-. �• ., t r,,.3 1i.,, l•Y�'c^ :� fi i-i• r a.•• {'4,'4 { ,.1 e..:y .ye�' .F") ., - f..ir n.4..: ji,ci, .- }. v V.r+ 4. :L: y r 7�' ♦ <-. ,'. -' w:. --• ..iv. ,, ) YY Jjrr�,•',,.1'F , r;-:i16: 4< r" 4T .,<<t 'A i ^ L>• 4�� T' ?..F 1 .�', k 4 • �h ! Ya� �� ? 1'�y r t 4 lix...T'F� nr., '1 4 ✓. f••.1' > .r �-N'x e• r } ) s•^ tj ♦ r u.,r�''. :. .,;•,!.r.L S -re t n 7• •'rh;y�siyr C i 'X`1,;?!y. •'t. -'•�r a:. ,G'" :c -.tdt7lr•.. tFy I i•rS r Gv.�f:•-CS il+,•,t ' N . .,�m -.y.r x�At � -, ,� )1:,, at'S(..wr�r�17'~ �tl:�:» .t �+ * � '�� .i F`777 •�'H�i�.r:�J r•. 1 'r.^•„Ft/r • 5_`� t�- �t'., v' at ,, ->! .•`",�. 1.444,..e,, �S'.it I~ Ru•o•it,.7..++ s, J r.�a .e r•L r. ,4i...1 • -1-4 . s a ♦ > , 2, ,t rt� q a , e `va t+ ..i't: r-^r 4r r,�) •C� r f •;. rt �:f�4 � .Sr�r, '•�Fj',:,.t J' 'y"• '•'..Y,yi.•;:!^ �•"„Y.,• w: !:�", �: ��(' .++,. '.^.4•��'•a`�•�,• '7Yi. .`i ,r-i' \ ±.('a ) 7 , t. l �, ►t ,+�"1 +'rr . +r••S , r' -vM.l r,'1 ' '' �„5_j•, 3, ' `k`' J -I. ,<-,. '���r :.6 .stltYk s S r ,�r,,�` .s"��'�aK •`r7, 'x'4�- t • pl Z. -.Fir�ti:`;`��+,`• :G.,i+'.fbF♦;•f1 �'z'.•„s� ltia,?,n i2.r{+.i1dMt �,.,,r�. kM •tf"' r{�8�i r,. '?r k..ri' il•`..'q .F. •t Ly yzYJ;�x tit '.t` 'tx z� <ti,•. -i .R; »A`-4 i•"3 , _r<4"�5�c..- S. '+„ci' •*Try " A .r: - z .+s s r.. �'• 4; .+)_e., ,r _ rf. .� s r y,' ♦`^` sa � ,1, ;'r'S,4ti yF,. f'' i'+�..,:-,.:f%).+, - ..i `1•;� ';� • a.g-,c•fiZ.. -..-r: f .„ ,.. *4: ' '• .1 •.,; .s.i,,,,"•;i'.ty t s. -.%..7 eiii s,'- ♦tir �4xN y?,'a dt! :' ,s csA'. '.A.'#,} ;td;?: :,,, �" .,1,( r c A a "" 3` .1a2 a r•'� ;Ir.',t u`_.vj1" ': yt..'"J]}��'aa,,•�a�,, .i` r� sr L' Lr� iL 'S. ) 1r q�;r,.,y :1 a. ,d �C!�+y.7'r( `+`,...,rr`�, ,••. jN 4. .. , ti ..1)•,,.. <p� "Lt� ) r•...r.,•T-. d-'+J .c. %0. f-.r.;i: 7).,,}FM 7('; j, •�, ,4r :i,l,!•�I }:�.': +[ k,i �, ��.l,r•:y.�� A•x/�." '•4 t n•,>< .r) .r•vrs. ,,gyp, yy;;.� �r +• 1��.�.,:..r r, I a•u. r »h.r S - l c , •+. - 4. ! '!.. .V$7" �,.,. vt. F"'. ..'•tr,J.? a ,Q♦ 'i'. 4ii.... til. Mice. .,t. . + r �, T.✓ 1. ,•. •:Stir + h.. V ;:''tq.;is.s Y _" to z - a•ti r v -... - rl 'L P Y.'S. 4- .. r r ' • ., !t.,, I .•.' y•y'... .r `1� l `.^ `.tom 7' 'S ;i d a. >1 .,.�4t ` yJT }•,y t Jt'.a VA J� !•r l } ,4!:! r YAIk • % `V.tL ✓ '} -'' r- +� J '2r.'. F yr r � }'f- .�r y'O SH�:. ,r ,s t;r,,, / Jl,t M�<�,i' iS y�`A��',,S�,' ,.'a• ..v�.�+r s T i♦ �x I M'r?'r'..",,, t� I •e � ♦i}n °'ij,,t ar% r r,•. J Tie' -i n 4 r > ti (.♦ `v f 7 I'+ , t` ,k .r' :} }�>d 4 rl. ��,,+ rk ! ,t: ✓r :n � P•? '' r, -L,. ✓ .i r. .Ci• •5. t l S t i Y•S ,^'. + C Jj ay y'4 A ir:,w 7,4:1 q ,r , 7:: it #. S. 'Y rV....7 _. .�';t,,,�rt•}f. ,-M i',•t t'CR rfP. . K )q.'4,F 3•l,1r':1. 'tr__ .. :1`5.. <Y.. S.,.Zt{>~_.U.I.,,7N.yhi+ ,..•i'� '+d rl � '." tyr 'Y i'r aa::,?,;: .."+' � i3. *�...},�,• ). y ( t w .y. r 4 :r +_ / ►' r •I+L 7 i.+ 'r ) :� r { f,q.� • i�t�.'y% � :3 ('p�.>ka::;,� �.c5`4`' a� -�u rr "'� >z,•��•-u, �;{�,y �r,.i "'�: s r.,v a+'. j••t � I,:.,� r .r M ti'r`•rl 'f+ '.'l•. ...,,ii1;,- �� >'"�4 ' r"i td a �i .4- > ya.:?. 4 r E -,. SrL` t n -Y- ; - r 4: ,i '�3�2r. �;.•fF� .Z, •' T 't"� +kt .u' ;r r( r�"� i,':n r*.♦$' 1.�}••.Lt�.'4�' r�4q'_ �� ra.�.A t � �, s . 3 .r_: ^•�y ':t'.. *! r =Ka{)• " .,t~°.r 0.• �i., t `C:' 7f .. F r'�I 1 1.t'+ ee•r.:{ .„2,,i R I-'r t �sri t.. ✓r •,.,..�-•- i�W f♦i,t',Y,'iT'•.t�. ry >�y, ♦ r i t{.3,�� .yr �-�r r ry"'�'�' �r »♦:��n o c,+ - 7� tad..!; �. )k�: f jrQ,S k4 >•rK•S,f..SNY♦'''..Yx�T>1 1.w 1'r , L lr�:�(•Y. r,t • �Y-Y( ` 7. -',.. •r �.q r s s• ff > ` N. I.'5mn .Yr d tyJ 7 F r t • •t!lr4 r`+ Y r fl. + S ,. f i t • • • • rv} 3 1•`a ..Sift,'.. „5av;v 4? � $1,•s f.r 41 :r »F�,4,.- ,. m zi i•fe„ `ko a• t�£s`.i; 5 4,':}; .i','}.'.I ca 1:+.5;r..r,'+'-•yN+�p,�'v% s+}"tt taC Sf�T{a f�•.'�' ,r:r'1•ti d�asr;'L'-7r� � $ .7 �� .. �- +,•.1,'�• �'Y: Y•S,�v,tt.`t,. , 4Y. . ♦ r,r♦ ,y t. F ,-.kr rJ •, 1 .yi i'4✓.r 1ti5 �.`s"j• 'i- r .: 'Y'.. • ,.-, r, , l'.9 `i•" ti 4:1�' '.it•v k<R a,eh r.'Tr „' ,v, • .� . ?;4 .sea Y r...,'. '�<u J ,.t. •"�•jj _r ♦ ti.- • + y ••� ,rM rr T+i f, `''. ?"<�`-�,y,4C<�,��'� :".r�� ,��yy>y t, "5.ry" ..�:: �a,�l.4t.-.,415•4�7c`�s '����syrrr7lr'L' r.Y:Ir� x,;+l • • w�"t,,,rEX.rr..�r ,��. k4 "! .i tV :'a t' i ..4.',t MT �r'k• rt -,+ti,/+' ?i"flj'f. ,4' .,r5!fi�,• *t4,4, '7lcxs�s'♦irih:',.:mod"i`Js" J�•, • • ri ,..V.:f'r -'04X#i/'"E�'.w,. -IA t^ b d '�r<t •`T ,.i 4i':'r4- .let,,,... :1.,,,, ,„,„.. T. r t,'Sti . �,'+'..f"'.a i. .i ' ,„.„.,,L . ,,� t rf ,,r• lar .'f• r .lad s .,.w, a"i .;,, . ilss 'rca Y ,,A 7 , o-,.1 j t , tv F" m nrS vi" i 4 `ats r L, "t h ♦k,F }'fa}`,t: ,r •,.. � t a R*P r +.rG,}'! S a 1.1..Z.Ye l,, is -4 ha <t r _ •hr )•5 o rf " a S 57 f 1, .t{ [ , l r- ykl .� yb.h F S CI, r d. t'� S.` ,t, , APPENDIX'B ''.r r�y�t�7.. Sze,. +_ t1 St'�,?gr, / r i ', Tr w"`+bi. .,,. J,y �' . l4 SyTP1 r `aa a. .�•r'4X � i., t}�. r�>S. tt�e G`a'e.r+i i' � �''<•} �ri' r'Yu ,r ,M ,$'tl+� ♦. .::. .., ... < �•}a .- ...„., $s�` .' �. �`" ''' ✓ '�' J•' !� ; a� LABORATORY TESTING PROGRAM .,•*t ' >i iKi'r . rr(`)P •�" Y rta v 1,r•ry it :i' bt 4y.;, 'S•n�^{*-'Sn f'!.*4. X + y -� t rr.!,.t•Y,,;' 4'. r `.Y£.fJ- '�,,pi" S'! Z i Y ra�'t-.,, �.- \.*�.<<✓4r'a, ls. e• "+t �,,,'t:dk i+v`N a �'S♦ .'" r i 4 X� i ag tt'i 1 "r' tit 'r4 i ..•. �`1 ' 'it.✓:F.` P 0 It ;14. , (s,M1 4 r•}er., ' • • d ti�a ,:;.# ° •. �t .r')i. r'r+'...v.� r y .fr' rA t,ti lt. i i-4*-.^a 111- i • 4•i'hfrw.L(.f" >`y x ii;.• -.F;. ! y•i trr ,r� ��, ! y, S i r`i' 1.Li•.i> .•.Yff r71.•k' „ri 4.,♦,r ,�', +'(j T .,4 ^ 4. ,k.,3 T fy..<t l rr l .i +y.n';j r , a e'�-ss';r.n.►` 4X:. 74 ,. ,. AA ;;CV, 5„ +_ttz '4 yf.;1 '� y f •K 4 ~ j,W.?. .;.MTI <�+`f t ry ,o,Y 3�r 7"i,+.ly. .>i'• i;• r >ti.,A? �1,Gtwft a- ' �;{t:" 3 h 5,✓ +`lam ,m,� t� � ,•+�,F.•1� M",+wYl._� A� f'k: 4 jJr�y `Ca 1 _: 'J 'S 'j`S .♦ - s1� i �r s rt �,14 ,it s ^}. �5 ?. - Pg.. '-1... .iI .. g4 ; ta:. s� ti ,....,' & 4�^1 b f ....s ,,,,A, r3, '; ,�'cr r,.y•s r „� T,.,ya ra r ',•irY r� r 5i 4d.4'i" ld. t.r 4.R7�♦Y S,� .r is t+'.S i c(,k?..�Z^i7. :.t,�:,t r ,�, c�4a"%e �•'a,.,.,_r i.�,, i }r Q'r k +``7 .Rp•�`( r`-1:)..4,.?. �-,�a�..�ti t y 5�,•+�,�.-. ter. 1�,',r..:-;',t.4•..:11r 3Y/4,.>.ay SY<.?e"r'IF{ ''-'„X'„'i-pi ry'1r �t 4 r.r •s J>tiifr 4 . e }e' `':t, i'F;•. >' A ea' ',+f T a !' Wi .,a r .q��, yt4,�R�,t' {�.i t;.,•1:;+„ ,•.r'; ':r n i.r :s�t",.w�; %i;`i J•s�!'afi (. ,,r•. , rA + J r !, ,s i.,'t 1 v. ,. y:7 ir• ;,..t''r•+ �'< Y , 3; .+J �Sv�;>.+ :w- �, y1� �' 4K^ �y } 4 � /h e .I�f'k,ll rb � ';:'�i�?i. �,v- r ,a y.rr, � :` _ Y# ,••i+y Y•��_. :+~"•'�� ! !� -, S• ,� -l., '�" 4:ri R_,�Y Ft f u.,'r•'�>9. �? ✓_{,,ru .7--. yr f• yr.t a 'F r .e ti.X4 -•:3 ;.., -•' �kr .• y ?y .r:tr!..:_ • .ff's, .?! I y )0.r.: i+4,• r" ,+fir yrar 't.`,YT'7 Y wJs.I'. w•f{.e, .•. tip, A,Jf4r,'aJ-. J-w •):„..,•''..• l +. ry. Ft. e,w ti. .3.1a,Z nK afy.r• .,a7 n J r^+'•..» t ✓.1st t r• h a r .4 '�S�SJ•=y` i. Tom.C-;.qi t'': f 0•4~X,z',•�':: L.rrt (.\' .•i4 .dar.;,, 'y J•� s T y4 `+f >if r- r� may,•+'� .i c w'l .� r r �..I> a r r A !!?h;i �.�,,,(� ti ,P�XC.-f't l'`' .r • ., �' t +-'fylye.,, ,�y+_ f ,t�h.r`-ih'`T -:ra 'r. ..5.r v7 •µ •• i (v`w.•3,r.. .i..w. ',w, .. 1r .,,.'.xy 2``,,.(..+,L r t :..i M�s.l b y i r j. „r ti i nr i` ✓y f.�,.9,v,,1.i,.,,;,•'Sr* •7 f�:•,•xv♦in•.. •�• ,l✓ti'E'('y �%=;a��if.-1,. L.l U iy...0.4 +f r +. r•v)r:sk t ' } h'„''`�. +Y V.: �,.r l' 5r`• '• ;- ,� •b" « r " 'J YY k •'� 5 sr r a I•+0L,',„;..L• rC',• ,}.t ♦ •,tr,N 4. Z' yi" r 5 . ' q.K .ri•>s !ii .ai;• �{' „tnr ,',,;9 „ tom`,r > •r. '♦ h"!• "', tt s't.^u..-,--- .1'b.:t^',.�•c. .4 ;�fi� ',0;ti3,'�;i.� g.. .,,,, tln lFy. t 3,� > ta`'^�•'g. '4'7 00,,,k r., saly :5, r-.. is `7-.F..�.ri- 'tit4t 4'(`tiv -. '� ♦ �''''.":l'� t•{' .t "ee . 7e` ,y� s. ?. e. f.k s ,l:,r''r f;, � .t,•. v, .fit: �S*+, r r "'' J,. /!i,Y{Y�.•r•:>kf�A «'ram -- x' �;.p!:s,,>�r."� -r$♦' 'S`{R�"''�7r''•1 t�.!�� ''" +•^�� .� �. "`! '(3M* .�y;,a•Tr z!� ^l^T' y { J� ;,.ia yi t '� 4. ' i.. .C � ai f.;- h_ti,. ,',i++lf` fr v rr f 1, .i Y fi �'7��T <ey,r'♦.� r � t' �,u.•r.e r'�` y�'}. pp:: ! �,�i+�".•,�'5.��`.`w���tf w�.k�e�r.� .i�,dt"'•a;}.'4 ° r, �}rba.�<���'ira '`°r"�"i'[,'S'+ ,•.�7�+,y1... r;.��.>}+iA;�,...e.. 5� 1> r 75}fv a� 4 F "f2 :; `:i".yf'�}•. 7 ztfi�n`;•w' f ryv .•1, y,. [. }r Jtir1t.'."?..".> ..i r.3d)'; i.�A�:IN<.I A�r"y,',•tC,'"::yy�� .,{,�f 1tf��1,rw, P�^.✓-i'ta'�','•.:.0 aid�1 4''hLA''lik :,. ",.YRrEh ensy•s;f"' �:.n v .:,ryj•Y .wv„'4.r!'" v .? 5z,'.. ,'itr! "•hy �.:'•?ri;.i r1• �,•�. ��9 �, i, .c�x � ry <. .•} J`e ', .1 rr"t ' `� t 1 3, �; S a tr��+; �i {ts +.at :t• { .,i W`�,LL,A..z . .�'r,..�•c„r` aW•c f,' x" ;Yt:� � ✓_-•�S`i.(� a: ISi T lip.,' ' c r: u s Jf` ... •r) NS s}i t•., ,•t:3 A;; r $ ,1 � :il ,a v� ufv I .i J>�n<i��i..ra...--. ♦ ,�t. c� YfL tt :,t.�Tt.•Feir'•rrr':`.�t.:•(=' r i r^ti ✓ ,t,. �e�l>r!,`y..';F.:"ft:i.•zy F ,j;F.',�f(�X�1F(��,". t 7' ff° ff,,'-'S;t•)^`l.�s a°+fi;, 1- ,« ,2 r �1r , .t•e.. r ..- 1.�'"' '' r, S ri•a!" !♦ j 7,. r -Yr•' t,i, :., � e .T'. Qi 5.'r I a ,`:.. A 1 � -ft 5J i4z7, •y. ♦l.'?: +; J •au;. ,r:;;r.' i 6.'?:1; CI.-.d�t Y-' . .... -�'a >F +;t.z :-.:: T z. L 'i} T S ! t %" 3C 'r ! r' I.. t•v,J` .�a/Jl• �`,� tenf,ti �r+,.r...i a`>-.•.T?,•"'i:rt.:r:- � �'v<I?.,Yt�r .t['-�'.+' .n.r�t 5.� n�. ,K� ,r?-s •Sr -e �, j'' i,� r�rr,l � II:,...,:.+r -t Y�,:..�•• • ':T it „f•Y„ a, .,•.r.��t•.s.- 'a:�`?'!y:J`'d rs`"�a,.txi .t T •4s•' 1.j3 ;;"::} i r `"r j4<.i r'♦.;r y,1 H++ '� , . +`•" `!s . j i;/,.": w �S+ 't�. r.:.-..,. tt-- 99�e i •}�+• ' is e� '* r' •J. .F J t A Aie`:ti: .+n� ri°ha-�C•i o,r. �t �ti )» r„c ri,q`r=7• „�.�yF•+i'Yrf+'e`3t;, y its^I.r tz,{ni•i �.t•tiy �: r� �t.•<� >.�le.i.'t, G � f� a r :>r .r1-�f. �.i?;!� a;';''' Prr.n a < at ti a : . •w:, §�y�i a s. t„ h t.;l,�I t ' .` 1 . '}.t c `it .. %n;.*''a" t'x*^r�rMi f_wyyL�i'D;��tJ"�' °�,ti,,.yry } ,e+ _,{. :`"t+'', �'%t a�rr+'i.'F:.rya�7 l;, F�/,� r�`�:.tLx�Ty +:SL •..' rvt,v';5,:rt-t fK a'r, J Y �" ��i:R,t r`. y ys'',a5% .•rwi.ii,.hi`P' •.IVe,�i ,.?.if si.v., -`r' _^+!h },. ker 2. i Apr w.. hr ! ..& ���i. ♦ 4 F .r Gi"w. f •♦•i�"'•K••.,�`, r Lbf•-,�"1'}'W=?••• t Fri{r;i�'a a .•. 1i .ry'r- >. 14 R r. 'Yi,rr�-a'.y• :ix ra •t T+s•••- d .y� - Tt♦{. , ro 3 J? -.�;.:-,;Ifi•`.: ,t'k. . ,�I-1 ti `✓ahK :.l.',._F.•' ,>.i:; Al :r F �x ,ic,c .t ss'` tice.+aiay,_.1.(.4* .'r, 3''F-r �i •:4trT,-y,; ti - .•ri '0f•.tt {�i. ><. -.r� i y,, 5r,•;;,- r,i1(,r `)�i `"T7 ar •r .(i t a ,p ..•4,' -) �'. :I. .: <r'-t r at..; T,.�'n✓ ! .• 7 u r 7� :.,,fy 4 17 .n> ,1, i t Y i i ',c l y ,,,rn y is+d__yy{{ r't.rx �l: )i i•• :t: ;s't f t;., 7 �.,,;.;.'. • ,..' r,r'Ll.�'� f y >"._' •rij7+i#yu ks �,- '1 v n'd .+};b,e,'[tY.F ) L Mh'4M. S`. ti'• ���,r ti� .j.. �. ( ,-r� t.S '•iF� 3-P'!:°``M1 ` ''i .4 •+i�?:.K`i+r5'[.5)•,:'1•,♦fi.•fkAlr.t*r11.••t,.l:�i;-7')1 14",+?ii�tft ,,"•r,?K. ry. *5tiyr• r •`t :tl• �Ct - -;/" ,^'t s'r.`4 +1 ;j.i.e vF .r.. rFr r� itM s _wri • i,( •nN'w 1 1^'S fi '17F✓., '�h ) ;%:, t 't: --1-rp,.r ,: fir• ��r f^• <.1, ^+v�„-,'.:.�•�•� �.�:,� �utS!�^• •k. � 'Ke�r;. ;Y♦riT,♦ y�r�,{,tyv!tr.i h �', � •ai � :• ` ..r �;' .tF � •+t t, kS(`�' ,( i�t-`�>w•'t�`r+L>.Yr t"+i 2 S `?i 4, il. +> w',rF'1'7 .t> .n e ;04 •r ✓j1 Jrn( ,t ra Y) + �', ,., :r-. r, - ,. 2S. ,[, iy jj,I.A,•..<f a'.a P�'••r i A /' t ri.'r•.;d:'V;5 2r.c .r�n Y)J: 11 y ,. •...5.'•• y .'i,L r , •'' �. ` ,, •r 1 y '' :" a ••1.. /' ',��F, Kk-.,q. •'4: F•.ir x7, >j,1, ti/v. ':� K. '4:. ,1.,�'✓�' :'r.,a'" .,:•, y,L Zl .T„i,•� "dir 1. .,�. ,4r - S$. of .. _ 1„•. t.. •/l'r i' .. .N.-.��f.r �: Y�Y. ICY _?Stir,�int� 'r"fi• ':.,I:• ,�'T ls4.r�I'�-iit�••n. l� `` � F �` tr-.' �,`ia� i�:"`'r,. '>W if.,rr�i•r1';zrsy •�?+r � _N 'k�M' i F YL J► nr M r,f •.'S �"��, .i�lir C..er'S,era. �''rC'+.�♦�� �,r�'4 �,� if'j xi.l Sot _-Y+',(,j.`�`�;�r•! 5.+ , �'_'S4 y r:�u � f��:X� :y n,. �Y-(1f .y�` .{ lE�" �v.i 'b��bt µ".r`�^h�.Lt47�1'�'(''rl� :a+'�+ 'i+^-fir�(' .> 1.��;,.,?Me;`if`i p• . tit Y.�; •,, -• h r .ri F'dV �n• .� .w•?i LJ +:,: :`rr'- Z .•,k r •1. n;s r, w F ' '' •rr t z• .t•hr'.-•. .a„p;:•Mre�kl=tes',,�{'J•,!a..jrS. ;.`.Y:a .JwrJr,-'L u ♦ttfr.,•rr.A 1 7 }t '(,;t1 ytYrj i., ai'.•/S �,3 : r.Tgr �.i'.? ;11,1�(:S`F: r^T r• y f < rr is :� hrl.5.,L'eyS✓i)• i ,•,'i. }. 'Y ;" 1Sx,-r-.. r_'4v:,...r7 }} ✓}+ iife,"r'f- yj al.+ ".:.u•'rt.::2�v; :�kt,: .lea '1 -`!L+°Y- ',* ..,."`9 +1.. r1v;". f �` Y_A. rk 3• t',�. 4 ti`‘ .,� 7 y+.n'.an '* /"� tri '+,.,z t +„ rF" ,3+ n+'• Ct L ^'#- •... -♦. -.f i' s. it, r .�- •'t t P t••.1 'j'il • �'..k .i •ny £Fc. . x fr.:.ti - 7�r >7 P •..... 't 'r:.ti13t�•wT} q,''. 4 V r n 4. l 3 j ri T f. .'t,t 3�{``, art ty.. Yyi�pT;+ - pY..•, sa r., 9 - 7 k, r e: ryryS ;,.. ' .....-yT,e,71,k1 ,r. ,•.,7 1.k .,tr� .'tr..T-', TS;•..;y .tit"'i c1F,y! wLr ,ta.�-.Yr y 'tl••r, ti,, .. II it frr I7.f.'rd i 4hr•, J' 1� :7- •4ki,:: ,Ff'r' Ar•' f+T+~ ,'?r f rrPl:; rt.ky,,.; Lk -+s,> + i ,R,..! _ nE• , 3:•<YB.r:Siff, 7.: r :-S ':'. < f r-,r .x %k t, L. 1D 11f }'..`Ai•>` R ;•i . .r jA ? r•.�.-� a..•'?.y,y.,. ,r} F J' • �,;r - v,�': .. ,r:�•, i J .♦1 It .� ti r t , . . .:5•� ,.( � •J"� �`y-) , ti. f+'-.•�l•.ra i s e r M.'IA•,•:ct. l•* ;y44:14. >fL'hi�:.> r•11.•�J t, 't J�M f!^k•4- ?.1.a 't -" !r .. •r 1d AJ.�, 4 Jam.� Y� }� r -, tY t�<� �.rr ':1c_� t �+.i• c y fl•,.. � ,,,•�,; ,� y, �C t r '♦, '`- ati+ N � � i S .m. � 4r{y-..:j e v .., r EF :��. ,rt J. . ,.,r,+ _4 e, !y .. N t. .. !!yy,,�� •t>• ' �1 li•.t _1,'.1 .Y 1ti1,. .t,. ± i ?5 rT r + I I r`-^, fi i.. ,. t 1 J- '1. },, . ].L`C.f f +"`Mi'; `�,tx K ,i1 .yr r.r.`.1't1 ♦ t.Y.-0 i i/y�Y�X+'+,1^'T J�3�r,�L gy-T 9(1,{, i�3I',.�,�.Mt,� 7:✓�, � ��� t- Zt .e�r A � ' t S e 1, -1r��.¢ �{�}v ,eP� 'l11!^. f Y Nr Yi V:.I.'.•{ t�R j..4t: �,: -1i Y. M-�r S rP1 �'` i. - :1: ,.'. .'I +Y st !• .!.7ff 'it rF"S. k..y/ :t 1A,4 s A% Nei o •a,, ,f. { ri�L,.sr i••S adr � {ro L v! ri' 'i••�'••' •:Y a ¢:•y`?; 4• ,,. y. .�}�.• �• . ,.. . .'t.l-r:-5 - .r..V• '„f'ryy r,, ,i'f• A••,.,S C LY) y iy`.r ,, yy ',e `,...' _ { i'; i>•: _'Sr ./ ;iX•i%.,�'e' k.: p� id.• 1 " ` ..,.•�S,rFt ,7 �' +a.:x �t,=.�b a ;.\: �A•.�-L lt.,�,..y..• ry'•gy !- r �� t •.�C .+.!+cY1f )lf� �4 a:Y♦i Y•-�`.S�-"w�.yiV.. 'i-' -.'',,,,•1 r',.'•(ti'�64., t; -}r ''n,,•4Y i..z! '�t,+`-,1;'?.'.ti'r r:�•1':In".4 K'1;3 � � 1 "`�`= _n"',A:. ti l:y.r...!♦• r'6•' .«: .4,.,, (I .t71,.�ti�..•.",✓`,,,t'"F" .4.,• „.1,; 1:",•f,-i..,Fr.a. 4;f3,• A4•f� Jrrt . -S•' .we irJ '�` '�) �f. s 5 •.,(, !`"'•�.�7•r..4 .♦ ,Ilr,...,�' ua„ i. ,. rf 3i�CT `'�,• ;-.� Y:C��;?a r 2d �i i .x'c\• di •^.;• •a uP ,r J, r .V ,r•:. WWW k•,;.: r,Yl r h.+rr ti �Y41.. +... .rL. '^„�7 •4-k � 't !it/q :,,,i .r5 ,. t 4- z r•J.:f ' n ,.Y:t+•i:4••rk; t .- fr v. ' . r:r .+;..ts s , rt , . et i- ti• .,t,�z •>'� �•;,•t r v s..;r>.ar. }t' Fiq 9f. s.,yr 3t, n �'r-.y t•t'•• re\.-I,i :tit.ax >.N 7`rl A ♦ 4ti. . .t,.,•.,7Sy r,Lrt w-- 7.r`!`rr �" tY -rk-t-a^'l 7.d 5 N•'yyam��c �* rfF,FS tl ;"j'S.v+:•.; t•...y * w L t're r .t• 1 f- yy •a""-SA , 'i'1t.4?4`�,riT tl, •,cyi'M yyS:'"w y, .s` .(,r"•.1,.,inp t ' t d. r .,'v1 y r _2K Yr7( / k .S.1-44 C y ,1:e.4 M ,T .,�._ � 't rt'�'1..; it- • �> ,i. i:i i V. 'f.. � i .f r -'•� �< r.ya1!'i•,.y�.• Sa'7;-..t ... +rL r rt ✓� .i �•+y.N�,r �• r,; .Si. !t 5 ,,.- ,i +'1 t J�...A rt P� p' 1. L zr".r +c t°' ��y, ••,i Q+ ' .• +; i'i .*Fik` 'fi- e.F ", 1 Ki-I l'.0.'iN', .!/- r `G :A • '.. L ril r ` , • {i'r�•':e•i'l.'✓. 1Pts.i4 7l >.. ',, s f.._ .3 5ii Y yS1i4'J k .T F.vs , k s , ._• t Z r .r 3 s r c ; e� ••31,,. ar l+� �•nt.,.,¢,v..y,5,,,, q at �1+� ;- l`„y J'r'=i• ✓ A ^� 4 ,4 r ♦.r}r ts: !y 4. 2 4 r { .,- r n't r� aT. i,: y ; F: ,t� ��}Y,,,,r� + ��' .r;, r •, �.�i!+ti .;. S ,��,.�.r y.} � v.��z 1,. ♦'✓.a. ,« +'4 w,�, r t ^tF �:1, +3T''� � P ! rw.^w•w 1;:. S w .V ,t•'. I ,1 W `: a d : '•"S i i Si ,', rr , t .';r q.r ♦ `• ,. R to t Fjr 1• t' • ..• �'fY r• C•ry' ,y 15'. , W .y r ri {.,> 4 T r'( a '�; 4. d t .n. •.s s ,r eS'�cc.�•`7 Y;J fi 7 f ern tr f 4 " :+r5 i y,� ,r •d", r ,a ,x•i♦ i y .,••.., s, ,, ✓�. ;$• �J1Y wIt r titer I .r+1G 1 1.4r' 1 'eu ..r' t .... e ♦ ..r s a i;;-,k,a t jr�c'e� '�,',Ifi•!. •t$3'{t� ^t•,1 n7Ar�`,r. {it; �'a i7a�,r fir,,:)'`'fi, f,;,rn' t14'<5: ui'� „i r _i '" rz41 a, '.Y. ;y^,.� J1 ,, ,'.� 5 ••r ++ . •ud�`�i;; J`'.CtS�.••• . ,ai.7`i•rm "Y..r. i '.., '.d:';'•it . irL>'K t'�'q:.',�1t t,:h YVt C/'ri,41:,I•rinx'•+ >ti� +6 a'iyGG 7 +'4n�.„t:`?i ..;-?J 4,- rs ,.L`• .,. +..;,$! 'ltr,0,, arr%. Sir..i.trais `i"�ii ».'r t-•rJ'.: .'1 . w' •'F11 "fAu.1r+.` %41.,v"V7,..•'4 r... V..t�',y '.f+ i .4.?:'. t4,,vh •`A S';•`1 'l ',4xF '�';( `, . - '. A,!. Li.J 4.. 'S+"f.•,. rr we•)4.. ;;; _f!..i sr?• W:r.yf<.-et!iX't?ky, }.w . +i .�,�ti.,'•�{v.. 1¢'l {.' K4'!I .rrT ',o 4 S tti �f r�',.J,"I C.- r'^i.4 i,...�(, .s N1•f'\.y.d',,.,r?`N.•.w :.4y'k^�'Aw>'k� ;r'.'"'•'arh.r -^,,,7 'r'- s,;���r...lt .;d,, r.�, .ri...`�iy�fp ti YM. aN � '�,: a4•f`� •,i, J�y` y�' ,�✓a-1 )�... �'�, >•'i .'b Lsa�a ! Z R�_i� ` :.'� fryl, } ,Fe v ? .•'-'-`t .'N:i i:'`�'+:T.Y:r xsi4' ?"'r '" , a '% ;•" S •1 i-�IN Farr 'i ♦.r,�, �' S ,.S n.`I . „ ar ;.. I 6+•" �;: 7f 7r Yr k'y.,'+K y, -Y.TY y,tN efl'f'.' a`q 1:-•+Y :•ic,'""..'�•,,i.+ rti.v.A' _ i t F + °�r`t i� 'M- .�t ,v, t y .'.:3:{:,;;. ,y 'ti 1,, 'r.s rj�,, 5 , ,, ,,, •4,. ,1cL, .f: ,, y�•'4�!` c".tr �H M�.t ,. 1 x r. r ,-1,; ..1} 0. ;'i1,,.q,4 31•' ,It+,e'< .'< .T '•j..F r}>" t+i 9�!' T_.�" i'+.'i�" 4r '1-� -i >'7'it :1C}1� fix 1•a :GL.+•r Y. ,Irfi. '1.lfi'r ss' ; T" r `i rri7+ ''YV+�' L y♦ "�t' q y+"Jtrs cns 4h.�C.ar "SFt�iF rr� a t1� ;i f. +,t�•.w�? 'fi"�s�rr•?�;!x t1'' `i<p'�;%' �:.•{ ; 4"^ 1 >w 'A r�+.„' r ' t.:t o sew' aryl `f. y„• .t' r` ,,r. 4 n Vct M i.t. � 6 i'itf t .r ;"°� ws• Ir .� )y .� ,s g i'y�•„.. t•J. fr rf n>, �,.�i�1,. .r, � J. ��in +s'•:x �'�'. + ;`1,!-• X V +a.. Jrs ' t „,, S f JE¢ f;.•„~+rt r. % .'t n 4; xg,•=', !�lt! y'W.tt,,•-. F:4 t. -las.f ZiNbrt?••sks , iY t 's" t�;. tytrr r z'Y 7t:;".''>";:r i'F 14• s >.,r �} •fF l:',.i. .,� �'i'�Gy,, x.:r t. K�� �t,t,;... Oti'ir r Y,L �+ �`., i ryrt �.,. r.�Fy7.� � 15L. ?� � tv � W ..t�^ �.:�.,f,�` bf?`�� -S 3 1".��. F 'hF ( �-^" P n f L� ��-6a �•'�' ,'4'i�e L. -':� t ,,-,,t,, R t c, a .1:4, ,,,,;•i �19:k,a w•,{,.1.T' 'f i a;\,r fr- 'sr. $•i?{r�'' }r 7,.ry+- •c^"f;••';i•F`.4,,i 'i' f 7,•ttM' 1T-�'-4`:;- t. peat 1., ro � r �..r, x �,? r''1 p. t x � '�- -. !. .Syr r'S � � .•S '3-ri �Is t.'�s;.�.u;,;i:.,. .t ,*,.., r ex r r `-. yd• R a,t•X• ' ';"aiy ,t •f•:4, L. fi`.:; - v '." S. r`r.i. ,bs.10 !;, ,:Hilt£ }. ':+fit.^;: ': +-- • tt??f t,?7f^ '`T?"l.��t..aD jj� z1, •f„(fry.'. .;.rjlrn y S+i�..r .,.`f'�� t, ,i,+ � 4_ '!t ,y i wi�:< k r v �,:r r„ i .ir Y.L: !, -.Al; r ^'> ?iq:;t") 1. P+'•ii•. .1 f4•. ►+.i Nr `:� bL;'.tri 4.n1,w-4.d{f^f-'J f •i w 1T.:, 'e 3n kt •f r •.. .' r f.t•,^L +« •i 4 . r.. '�.>„s ..." •'"5� � ,�!•c�'<". .. + n ' h. ti Y - r♦ 6nxt v"' J r l�� ,+f r"� .y .•. `Jt �>`h r' r .! ,,s:.y.hr. ')i'+,v, j g .w i v ti, N � T.r i r .�' •e ti.•f1_r.t�S; r kp..a {S,.:4, ,v?:•i"`Se T'k:C !! ;'''�•,.rrt 5"t,5r`r }r,,•5 �.: • ,,,,,t. r a 1, ".y J b' e ? ?.-f Y�'+t a ,r ii- ti•i. r ?4( ,.e.i.,"i.:�"..y�yVt iL.:'';-'{:j'w,J,ct A:i i.,i n fit,,3` : .,�' }T 3 {l:',:1 i:- ,4 �:•�+.•'1,�f r r rr:s.- '+r ±� r:�`i• -••,.a:�-t,?;)•itP�. uy11'`t�"',” Wy v� '4:It,': -•q•rtf/�.: 4 ir+. v.►F`4y., •4• df(j+ ryr,:.,, FX rMt.. yJ 1r;;}J -r•♦w..i b r t� 1 . ,a•.�...1•,�.,w7. y••-•:i'. Ae S r r :a . r;: Lr2•I" '• w a 4�` ti 5Y r•. a -, t.it 1 : r . 3. r ter i e ,;f .4),... r•>i i '� t f:�y k S. t' .• , t. , r \ r.5: , - 1 - - Y-' i•'�' y'"r "br 3,:I•Yr. Y 'itilK,f•. „rv+:' ... - ;1' SP • '° 1 ri'k r i,r.ctr• : M'`ZJO S v���g�',fit v't•-4,+• '' ,r A•, ,' ,. �i'^i4 .�rr' stir f,,,,,-.,4t t rn �!T<` lZ S,c Yti 4 3A)' >5 ',"..a+ .a ".,i r..,�[...G^S�i '.'• rr .4.-e•_a.,.•t•o. '�` I r'° 'T �T, .V-- r F Fa h , -Y C 1.l 1 ;.,* rig•,. r• 'r -Y �i+j ? � <•k. „1t,..'S$. t3'i 4t' ?.' ���i � X 'r` :t. . •+t!•`..': .,, ,,fir�.-i S .±. + '�t�L!'+,i., �:1 ,, .:.0• jg, `_ d 3 it r fi7*4+*k '" 14�, p ',,.A:k xt'.-,Y. . j: C lr i t:i•"-�:'`°� C �'< t✓ ..+J��gK...ys `� ��C11�F�J ',,`,,ml',t�Pa.'�a ♦:vr';,M r• ;s,'r' ¢"'rrvr 5?t'�+� Y�7�- �,,� �5',�, 1�...f';,. c. �..''�,' ',�.�h..f:,� t�`.�v i �r,7+�"'�. _ �t..,',i,,��y.,s•'�7-1^ rs!1i:t ,ti SA,-3 !.`' _•'�,rr,t! �,."4,•:;, ,: •.'(' Gz, :�" 4'r ' t ;L'•t i` ,.._+"'S,:ra,�: •.,,:„.,t rr e' ♦ AWa k r Ff�rf�F)A :{,sW `Y';•fi°rv:N�;.'t. _',. � �� ��• r a .axe y 'ttiyn'.,A\.,,$�v • r'.��' ::sty •',-'1 � ��% t r > ,� ! -,. '•+P i i4 nt:a'♦y. •5 a � , I 7 lr• a 5 ,+^i. i � •r.-...0..,Y�e,'•t"Ikt.Ai••r' . K ;ei`� `,r?>., r ae,..fY•Y+`: •1{•,�f:.•�' '� i -�ryi �i j, i! 'L.,1 .1 nt r�r. (},,r R,^.}. 1 'Yt� �' • {+rr -/ �' ^.:P W dp."y, A �. '�`KY, f`ri'iM ti Y F^,rot'•�i•�' �j .7•t,-It�i✓ ,;M..�1•/' r�.)�/i•. t�'1F.f,¢\��•t,♦."..)•[�\r.�t�' .i.,..yi'(✓b,.✓'w,.i,j rl.'.%.�i,�•,r„A M :/r•Lj(�.•✓.y.( - ri- . l fi . yY+Gt�Y .4. ,.4�F ti,.1 5✓' .s .'i} r•ili•` .... htfri4 'f A '4 1, ' ,-1 S , -,,t ,.t +43 .ta"'.i.._ s•- n�rr x� N �' * d iN(.Ttt r h-k j7Vt ,yr.Sr Y(, ..t ",f "tr,i„i ra•R k i:\ 1 1 u Y f';,f �1t:�'t'r•-.,�eY 'Y:r`>' ?�'i'H!'ii . )1, I:- rt y.,A. :''`� •f t 1 ,rr <S., :'i f ., %:� ,41,++ r !+ •z'':;' n: a d,. ' i r ti 5 . �t" w ,. +Sie' ,�.. .S ,..'x � :t.. -.t.. r, .p.. �r r „ r ♦yY M#;+•.,4 ,h n .a. lY y 1 .4 ro ,.�.♦� 45' xy. +,i �,r i"4. ' r7t♦.:,"r r K•): 'airy:- « t <5; hSt,",g '-s•'t• r• br'r r.7,., Y a .a} r 14 a r••ir .',.•t^ t U .•••r;t- ,-;F ,j � ,''8T,♦3. .ts,+� c� r.; '... ",: • • - rr f.. �..,17 ;- 'r r"f:i:r,: . :z., r i. +w, , t •;;: %+ t >2'; .;?ai'. wOiGF: r s � y a>, Jr .f .4 Y. � tt /yL '}a , .,.. i ,_.d, A- '4 r ty,,�,�;r;•.. -.'. 1LE,.J !.i +~`,••."'9-ra.�' "14'"�yi,,•,A 4 •>�+G7" �.l,5.0.)"K'ylf frr'')-J: Yr•+ .rt N S}.:.'s:'f:.n,;. r f QfS.Rr';:�';. � :.'�1'.,;;.'..-•*:', ..F ftiv L1A tlly r !•*kr. .: <i'"%4''L. 6 :fFf'':+�'•Z 1►•.ztj.' ,t•!;*'a:uw y;'?er�<<'QJ..1,.•�,7p1'.Vi+':� T.• w.•, CYi `• ry,..:,•S•i-?.1'i• t.� f.. �. jf...''. try .NL 'Tr,Le • ,•r. H ti ..:': ate', •,..4 .} i. i iffF( . t±:..4•,,•+'.tiir'.)-::••*V.,gyp,' ,y..I,R...4,6f'rfi•t �i.S 4 -�J'r,a,t' ,.0, Jv aY,•• ? ir5}r .•r,. : or.--. TY♦ .Ct, rS i »1j l•.:' ♦e+e i-4ihtil•••' t,- t t'•r ii•a. T..nj' r >,P:,,i 7 `n, t i1 „r Y. -C'i• , •,•.:• j•'{Y ik., '�k. •. r)r ,rt' t.• f r•,: "✓> •�f! _ J? r t .x v..f. ':.�a_ i •F,.� -.?• +4,'1 •+ yr i, •a ) fy.'. (' 4 + .C( f C; .t r , y • „r;. P��;. 1 Y, .•i,j,7 �-i:,W,i. {A1 may,„� ti}` :;t�••r'f� r' +� i.'r^�'; R ,1�, '!i• r J" 1 P',;i l.•7 ,f,`.•.Jt• ar(.?.. F' err, y-, ✓ .f'.'�5.5:, . Hart Crowser J-4329 APPENDIX B LABORATORY TESTING PROGRAM A laboratory testing program was performed for this study to evaluate the basic index and geotechnical engineering properties of the site soils. Both disturbed and relatively undisturbed samples were tested. The tests performed and the procedures followed are outlined below. Soil Classification Field Observation and Laboratory Analysis. Soil samples from the explorations were visually classified in the field and then taken to our laboratory where the classifications were verified in a relatively controlled laboratory environment. Field and laboratory observations include density/consistency, moisture condition, and grain size and plasticity estimates. 4 The classifications of selected samples were checked by laboratory tests such as Atterberg limits determinations. Classifications were made in general accordance with the Unified Soil Classification (USC) System, ASTM D 2487, as presented on Figure B-1. Water Content Determinations As soon as possible following their arrival in our laboratory, water contents were determined for all samples recovered in the explorations in general accordance with ASTM D 2216. The results of these tests are plotted at the respective sample depth on the exploration logs. In addition, water contents are routinely determined for samples subjected to other testing. These are also presented on the exploration logs. Atterberg Limits (AL) We determined Atterberglimits for two fine-grained soil samples. The g P liquid limit and plastic limit were determined in general accordance with ASTM D 4318-84. The results of the Atterberg limits analyses and the plasticity characteristics are summarized in the Liquid and Plastic Limits Test Report, Figure B-2. This relates the plasticity index (liquid limit minus the plastic limit) to the liquid limit. The results of the Atterberg limits tests are shown graphically on the boring logs as well. Attachments: Figure B-1 - Unified Soil Classification (USC) System Figure B-2 - Liquid and Plastic Limits Test Report ,3 Page B-1 **************************************************************** City of Renton WA Reprinted: 06/28/99 13 : 10 Receipt **************************************************************** Receipt Number: R9903087 Amount : 1, 016 . 50 06/28/99 13 : 10 Payment Method: CHECK Notation: 31309PACIFICENG. Init : CRP Project # : LUA99-098 Type : LUA Land Use Actions Total Fees : 1, 016 . 50 This Payment 1 , 016 . 50 Total ALL Pmts : 1, 016 . 50 Balance : . 00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 000 . 345 . 81 . 00 . 0007 Environmental Review 1, 000 . 00 000 . 05 . 519 . 90 . 42 . 1 Postage 16 . 50