Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
LUA02-079
KOHL RV & BOAT STORAGE/LUA02-079 PARTIES OF RECORD Carl Magnuson 3400 E. Valley Rd. Renton, WA 98055 • I MICROFILMEC Last printed 07/11/02 8:38 AM NOTES N 1 PLANT LIST \`� INSTALL 4'TOPSOIL IN ALL LAWN AND PLANT BEDS. ` ° •e¢ , INSTALL 3: BARK MULCH IN PLANT BEDS. • PROVIDE ONE YEAR WRITTEN WARRANTY FOR ALL PLANTS AND LAWN. ___ emmAu CI O 8 LIQUIDAMBER STYRAGFLUA SWEETGUM INSTALL AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION PER IRRIGATION PLAN. il r WS .�� 2'CAL. 30'O.C. NO SUBSTITUTIONS. To n MEE OBTAIN ANY AND ALL REQUIRED PERMITS AND INSPECTIONS. rmnvsx 2%NATURAL LANDSCAPE CALCULATION r LAYER BARK ur • xmyu NICE a.w. / m ma 3 PINUS NIGRA AUSTRIAN PINE ' PLAN � ; 6'-7'HT. 30'0.C. TOTAL LANDSCAPE AREA PROVIDED•21,36E S.F. I►C. .oe u'Tw.,: ru.wTwW aux�Nw _ NO 2%OF TOTAL REQUIRED=427 S.F. r o-s. Ic¢ / �N _as,m 711 TOTAL NATURAL LANDSCAPE PROVIDED•18,041 S.F. m So^WR NU 1 TM O'a AP A REMOVEET 10 hiUJA PUCATA WESTERN REDCEDAR NWT NT WAS.s NONBAu n°i ' w,n ��. - 6'-7'HT. 30'O.C. TREE STAKING DETAILa� SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL CONIFEROUS TREE STAKING xra •T+ (13, 149 MAHONIA AQUIFOLIUM OREGONGRAPE 2 GAL. 6'0.C. 20'MOE GRAVEL EMERGENCY ACCESS W/20'SM1NG GATE ® 56 CORNUS STOLONIFERA REDTWIG DOGWOOD (NORMALLY LOCKED) IMPERIALS BINGO 2 GAL. 6'O.C. . r I I — . 0 50 PRTUGESE LAUREL •` _ 54808' �xa _ ,�J• I LAWN JB SODG OREGONAL 6'OROWN I I S_ _11i ' ,....J a.r..oa.r.,: / N BIOSWALE AND NATURAL AREA HYDROSEED T. XVI �p I ELYMUS GLAUCUS 40% "t�\ \ •PE FRO T. .TAL-00 \ .-EN RO T FESTUCA RUBRA I t : De A TAL=AC (RO. SL•-E M AL'00 I DESCHAMPSIA CAESPITOSA 10% i I I 11��. TO OR .) \ E B CK GLYCERIA gCCIIDENTALIS 2% i�2o W� YZIGACA R 1R s•Nc GATE I SEED RATE:BLB. 1,00E S.F. I I • - - - -_- - -- • 10-20-20 FERT.AT A RATE OF 8 L8./1,000 S.F. AL` y ON EXISTING FREEWAY WOOD FIBER MULCH AT A RATE OF 2,000 LB./ACRE %I` __�_ -- _- - - 110 '4 DRAINAGE DITCH INCLUDE'J'TACK IN MULCH. 1 I I LR ��„ I` ASPHALT _X ' �!0" PAVEMENT )6kp - ik:�a1 ID E DE- 'L '00 1,00 GRASS-LINED BI n.L..• „,0•D Q I I - �It• ` - .. OP TO OR .) . SWALE. 100'LONG, O WIDE G■ I ,, O TAIL SH SWALE SLOPE 0.3R(SEE DETAIL SHT.C3) of .. 0' r• Er I �i l� / ASPHALTCO - / PAVEMENT }I `�i:iiii ev 001 /////////////////////// . 1. D- wI . WALL O. 11.) •j� WALL UT FA E `^ f• Q f ill- . ASPHALT -_ _ >I *'. Olt �� PAVEMENT %.3 A. I.EXIST.DRIVEWAY I--I I 0. k'CURB DROP TO A REMAIN �I I mg 0'N1DE I� _ I�RIVEWAY /i _* (WITH MECH.GATE I. L� / , ,_ ,- • LDNC.I SIDEWALK • I I a e`{ II�ryy^� 71� SLUTe •. SL. .PTALFO. o III REEW I Y WI ' . I //~\DRAINAGE EXISTING FDI CHAY pp I� Gk SOUTH END AUTO WRECKING 2 Ell„�. LANDSCAPE PLAN LM'A, KOHL EXCAVATING : 5-21-02 Sheet KOHL RV AND BOAT STORAGE 3330 EAS T VALLEY ROAD ems, D.OL III EAGLE DESIGN Lo 1 RENTON, WA. 98055 1 PHONE.. (425)251-8820 26007 TEL.NE 426 BBB—BB�YON 1!(A91BN' _98053 2 g A PORTION OF THE SE 1/4, SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 23 N., RANGE 5 E., W.M. N 10"x6"TEE(FL) U 10"x4'TEE(FL) 1 i 1 (2)10"ADAPTER(FLxMJ) 6"G.V.(FLxMJ) 10"x4"TEE(MJzFL) W 4"G.V.(FLxMJ) • 4"G.V.(FLxMJ) Z 20'WIDE GRAVEL EMERGENCY 9 LF 6"D.I. CONC.BLOCKING IMPERIALS BINGO J ACCESS W/20'SWING GATE HYDRANT ASSY. a (NORMALLY LOCKED) • (2)CONC.BLOCKING FIRE SPRINKLER SYS. 12 FIRE .PRINKLER' SYS. C.B./5(TYPE 1) RISER SHED(6'X4') 1' RISE' SHED 6'%4' RIM: 20.0 10'90'BEND(MJ) i • e z I I ( ) IE: 18.5 CONC.BLOCKING o "E I •i, I . -� ----- -- ------- / • 548.08' m - --_'°z EXISTING FREEWAY DRAINAGE DITCH O `t EXIST.CURB DROP I IN a E1 _ IV s Z TO BE WIDENED FOR \ 1 I�_ �• v�,v ,© � ••TA ,1 � EAL BOOK ,I�I7 \\ I c Q EMER.ACCESS I I Ct Z I 20'WIDE t5'PUBLIC WATER EASEMENT(1YP) \\n �/ 'ic _ SWNC CALF . r .TO WATER FIRE SIIEDD I I I ` J Q ' • - 69 Lv to'D.I. • .P RaoFFLOW UNE: _ k CUT IN EX.12"C.I. j"" - " '-' ', 1 f I 1 !• I I1 6 T 0 C/ 12"x10"TEE(MJzFL) I o110'ESMrMI - - - _ _ _ _ _ /k., 1 I IILJ , �` _�� y • I I 10"x6'TEE(FL) 10'G.V.(FLxMJ) " —� a,�� (2)10"x4"TEE(FL) .b 2-12"COUPLERS 1 I I I a tr tD'DI. �[sl..gri ��``ilk `\I■ I I ( ) ( ) 2-12"D.I.SPOOLS it (2)10"ADAPTER FLxMJ CONC.BLOCKING S' ASPHALT I, ____� I I- 6"G.V. FLxMJ z o e I I I; Ia PAVEMENT '� I .I •i ■ I I (z)4"G.V.(FLxMJ) y ;` - QI I 1, \ ©® • P- •-OR '` L_�I I I II14 LF 6'0.1.E EI FlRE SPRINKLER SYS. !�, IDE` l '00 I (YDRANT ASSY.RISERSHED 6'%4' ,L,� 3 CONC.BLOKING�T GRASS-LINED RATON41y '' Q ° CB 4 TYPE1)-_ TYPIEa• OI 20. ASPHALT I I I (p RIM: 199 —� I I4• O BOTTOM.SWALE SLOPE:0.35(SEE Ps I _ 1• 1804 PAVEMENT `�'+ DETAIL SHT.C3 E IE: 16.78 e I I I ) �N O I r ,00n , �. I I ! _ , 5'HIGH ECOLOGY BLOCK WALL. -q5 >-" d' a I I 70P EL 419.50' ':�71' LLJI ! I! • ]' SOLID BL•• vL( // ' - N B.EL.EL 414.50' s,. 3 -J r WALL "•LIT FA E I' I I 1R 12"OUTLET: JI • I IE: 15.0' �,; * 0"x4"TE:(MJzFL) '° ae d° ASPHALT C,'N' I I --0-:,11 I 2 • G.V.(FL MJ) ' PAVEMENT 1% I I • W/OW RESTRICTOR ` C• Bo I E! I RIM: 19.5' I—I I o u 4 I I OVERFLOW: 17.5' g EXIST.DRIVEWAY e ; y+° ! A 1 IE 15.0' 14 CURB DROP TO \ REMAIN ��'30'WIDE .' 0 :0': Nt -,1 . I o\I' (SEE BET.SHT CS) R I DRIVEWAY ,- - "' 15'-so,wA, E-.Exr Tw -C•-C. --OC.' Ij = - �" I 1 1 I(WWTHiMEC � I I/ \ 5'HIGH ECOLOGY BLOCK WALL. 1 CUT IN EX. 12"C.I. • I , TOP EL: 19.75' I ib 12"x10"TEE(MJzFL) I % I I I I BOTTOM EL: 14.75' - 1 x.. 10'G.V FLxMJ 'oDNc.l slocwux U _ ( ) EnsT I 7 DRAINAGE DETENTION POND: g 2 12"COUPLERS iI EXISIf.a I OFT1cE I ��- .-x.>• 120'LONG x 12'WIDE(INSIDE) 2-12"D.I.SPOOLS I E.S To I I BOTTOM EL: 15.0 CONC.BLOCKING (TO R MAIN)I REu N N17,,irjr5E I I: MAX.W.L. 18.5 cIi FFEE DI It . 6'vVC ,. FR• TOP 19.5 WI - IM1°I \�� •AL SL��, TAD.°°N� 5. III IE. POND INLET s II e .�, uNDscAvic � — 1�..`` . L L. ,r IE: 15.0 rI =- --—- 541.99' -—-- r>$ - ,�.�+ /�I� EXISTING FREEWAY Q gy Q( FIRE SPRINKLER SYS. C.B.#3(TYPE 1) 10"x6"TEE(MJzFL) �, / �—DRAINAGE DITCH 9 g E I �u - • RISER SHED(6'X4') RIM: 20.0 6"G.V.(FLxMJ) C.B.#2(TYPE I%. I 7 WI - IE. 17.43 x 24 LF 6"D.I. RIM: 19.5 SOLID REAR PANEL WITH I// 3'LOCKING DOOR HYDRANT ASSY. IE: 16.12 CONC.BLOCKING \\• I k' I.WATER FEED I/ TO RRE SHED , 10'x4"TEE(MJzFL) FIRE SPRINKLER SYS. • -SOUTH END AUTO WRECKING 4"G.V.(FLxMJ) SHED RISER 6 o"D.I.SPOOL ('X4') CONC.BLOCKING ��o :p��i SITE DATA: GRAPHIC SCALEkw ` P ', , ow.0 Tn/ma I NO SPACES: 180 • KOHL EXCAVATING Y O CITY' RENTON' 113 COVERED RV SPACES (62.8%) (Mwe.1 s 3330 EAST VALLEY ROAD 1 PM-a R. DEPARTMENT OF PUBL. WORKS 61 OPENSO-A .2 _D SPACES (37 %) RENTON, WA. vows DRAINAGE AND PAVING PLAN SITE AREA: 4.13 ACRES PHONE: (425)251-8820 JAEGER ENGINEERING KOHL RV AND BOAT STORAGE SPACE SIZE: 12' x 40' (RV's), 12'x 22' & 20' (BOATS) 9419 South 204th Place Ixwalm JJJ JJJ/LS °• °n0/03FRE RARE ' SITE WILL BE LIGHTED USING ROOF MOUNTED FLOOD LIGHTS Phone No.(253)850-0934 amt. JJJ u°'. '"°° tiwa •ti "a ...3. Ff PM. °R Fox No.(253)850-0155 °ran°wR ��•...w ww•T C2.,5 u") CORRUGATED METAL ROOF A PORTION OF THE SE 1/4, SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 23 N., RANGE 5 E., W.M. 1 ----------- PROPERTY SITE DATA: E ° U• % 7 CEND;ALLORRUGATED D META` NO. SPACES: 184 / I 1 METAL Pos s j ti'� 113 COVERED RV SPACES (62.5%) i ��i 69 OPEN BOAT SPACES (37.5%) g vA & •z SITE AREA: 4.13 ACRES SITE co i ASPHALTCe SPACE IZE: 12' x 40'SURFACE ENTIREVS12'x 22' & 20' (BOATS) SITE WILL BE LIGHTED USING ROOF MOUNTED FLOOD LIGHTSE / o J TYP. COVERED SECTION LANDSCAPE CO CL SOLID CORRUGATED METAL WALL 20'WOE GRAVEL EMERGENCY VICINITY MAP Q U.I ACCESS W/20'SWING GATE NT5 C Q ~ SOLID METAL END WAG FIRE SPRINKLER SYS. (NORMALLY LOCKED) IMPERIALS BINGO SOLID REAR PANEL WITH RISER SHED(6'X4') SOLID REAR PANEL WITH FIRE SPRINKLER SYS. 3'LOCKING DOOR a 3'LOCKING DOOR I I RISER SHED(6'X4') re ' 5q�pg a� — SOLID MET,*END WALL = I #'D•4'90�E809WU e°"°°"°°'°P'°d'eeee•ab¢W hi.da 10'WIDE LANDSCAP STRIP goo-' -- - ems' O 9 I w ,✓'-d6d6,:w9QA, d4db Rxf6.986dbd�TbN°OTdp i Y N '. "`i` 266 • N ON. \ dvoc+wrl !; _ - EXIST.DRIVEWA4 I+ i �\ i 'I TO BE REMOVE • '72°SF ME-L B CK L EN -0 II •7 I -_ - _- _. -...TH \ 36 F� 16 ME L.°pF \ \ W ET B K \ IT' Z a Q■■■ zo'WDE 17 COVERED BACK-IN SPACES 0 12 z 40 EACH N1 o_ I: .,,,, NG oATE 10 COVERED BACK-IN SPACES 0 12'x 30P EACH ' I \ 1 0 0 STREET TREES,SHRUB' A F Id E FRONTPERENAGE LS FLOWERING ALONGI I�N. W - B. ,T i�`CK IN S��O 12'x •- __ \ t ,� \pi II III)I SOLID CORRUGATED METAL WALL Z - FRONTAGE ""((��77yy-yyy � E ilk 3.. :L' :Li . - \ ,yam ASPHALTlik oa°5F E IA QI3� PAVEMENT \�\��\\ ' .-MW‘• i, EXISTTNG TREE SCREEN <'JI F S I I a o. Gla► D `� �,� \�� 00 60° ° ivl TO FREEWAY Q I G ASPHALT 23 COVERED BACK-IN SPACES 0 12 z 40 EACH I I� I, ASPHALT eI o I II UD II CJI a PAVEMENT — - PAVEMENT &I ! ' i`E 1 ii < LC I I E n $ 7'HIGH SO a BLOCK 23 OPEN BACK-IN SPACES 0 12'x 20'EACH - / 1 11 ' Li I:1:Z WALL(Sa FACE j / ,05 flot, l I 3 J I I I • •`1 w WIRON TER //i±! • ///�j//®/j/////////ASPHALT mI K j i\I i 1ttJI < ,i F CE O ENTRANC A '0 ''VEMENT of --- iliIO >I ' I • 1? N 22 OPEN PULL THROUGH SPACES O 12'x 22'EACH / l - II�qq1 a oy7�' EXISTING FREEWAY �- (nI I I ,g>q V � �i� ® ',:7A S •R' �I _ �W II�DRAINAGE DITCH 'R1 I S- A RAC' .I ��, __\a�1 \I' QI '3P_0Yqp1,4� -/ / ® I EXISITNG TREE SCREEN IIII I I DRIVpWAY� �'', -,,\\II I� TO FREEWAY ASPHALT 22 OPEN BACK-IN SPACES O 12'x 22'EACH"- c M°� .. \, A PAVEMENT bla 1 CONC.$IDEWALx ! f EXISif. l5 ED CK-IN SPACES 0 12'z 46.5'EACH I S l ! NgI I I DR1/ AY . Ezm¢ \ 70 COVERED BACK-IN SPACES q12'z'•.5'EACH '� _ 1n T •(1.0R MAIN) RIDG.TD 6...., BL G; 4 w 3P FR NT, ET R F W I i I I REMAIN \ 81 66 •S • AL BA ( OF LO 71. SF •MEAL RORi ., I I ID REAR PANEL WITH :el IIII TO UBLE 3'LOCKING DOORS 1 e LANDSCAPING 25 ) E B CK ~ / • el _ _�_���_L_ 154 . � Il/ly «I II FIRE SPRINKLER SYS. FUTURE 5'WIDE_t 541.99' SOLID REAR PANEL WITH �1 e, I D METAL END WAG 1 RISER SHED(6'X4') LANDSCAPE STRIP 3'LOCKING DOOR \ // s J4° y ly ,,(,, r E AL END PALL I I 'F gI - SOLID REAR PANEL WITH SOLID CORRUGATED METAL REAR WALL t/ 3'LOCKING DOOR SOUTH END AUTO WRECKING FIRE SPRINKLER SYS. \4\\ / 7'HIGH SOLID SPLIT FACE CEM NT BLOCK WROUGHT IRON RISER SHED(6'X4') GRAPHIC SCALE/ baL e FENCE PICKETS I DRAM WPM II II I �I II II Il II Il Il II Il I I1 i■ MN ' 7 " °° a 1 1 1 I I I I I I l l I III III ""`""�T I I1 II II 11 II II (1 LI II I II II II I II ■■ ■•I KOHL EXCAVATING (aeaT) CITY OF' REIVTON 1 [ I 1 l 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I_II I I111 3330 EAST VALLEY ROAD in. N. DEPARTMENT or c WORKS III I l l l I III 1 I I I I I I E l l II��IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIii �" 25 SITE PLAN I 1 II l 1 1 [ I 111 I m PHONE: (425)251-8820 JAEGER ENGINEERING KOHL RV AND BOAT STORAGE 1 I I 11 III III I I l I I II 11 I I I 11 III I I II II ■■ - --MN 9419 South 204th Place sam: JJJ DAIS- e,p702 CAE NAME 1 J. ri, J. II .1 ,1, .1. „ .1. .1. . .1. .1. .1. a. .I. III 111 Kent, WA. 98031 JJJ/LS g TYPICAL FRONTAGE FENCE ENTRANCE FENCE Pho Ne.(zs3) 34 «« u. « ea „,„.K.„,„.K. ry errd nW Foxo No.(25J)850-0)550-0155 IwexOWR �p�-..« >Atr Cl oF.5 I - v U el el -1 limr BENS10NS. IIk i Q '':OT'' e: S rp-s.121 •nu, r ® ddd 71 co lBI W ::J:: ET-12) lT� QI H 7N/a geDA t. 1 - fI•I ® p®OSe-TT •any 1 12 t 11 e I Ipp A MIS % _ J.N 1.Janes L Reek �: 0.)1,4.111 XII* y m 6 9,y J i�O i i 4 CA y r3 e„u n=r�7 o ; ffi J 9 CI3h W I I Z 'A148.11f + tx4 Q = IKh J.M.Hawki 3 :.i _ SW ate T. ' SITE �e. cr I I o llVJl' ~ srova e3 tl 5om Younker C.W. \ 2en1k. y�; TIACI.• '.,�� `�a ?' 3 S.W. 29TH STa ` — — .� VI... ss -ma- _ - --L-_1'•._- ••= -- i ®LTeAr. ` "�- PARR 5 IfiI ST. Nb�Y� '6 U r hZ+✓ _ _- Zxr W �I a fAl e • • :`o` <�r vt �A4 - 4' fr III (Al Cr 1 a i0 VICINITY MAP w I Z I / 1l S.P.063.110 lel 0 \I N T.S. r J ' ~ I [ i! Se3T9.79 i I M.N.A. Haofinge �. /rolling. R e�\�D >• A Q e I i lI1❑.40 0 I ever_� j ta; I— 1 E[k t4s 621 Ac•3l''; :i U Q Q • k. �:T....n3L = -_-•/• Z III(9) Qe ? NI 10ENJ(t.30.. ® Inn -5 Wo �• •'ufv, 0 rl.1 C Q a a I 9.PLW-9e•06e 23-s._ • - , `.• 14AC �l Q -I Q I I I.-D�+Y (I� BLD.- I /� 33 0 Li1 •Q F, w It _ I I ,.a �+1 • wl ' Si --.1 3 O Btij II _'c_�r -• ----.•_ L = Normen(lima,. I : Y `` Q ''t r=-a„7I' I l3l I nIy%MIALS 1 & 0-• 3 • 1•firS Cr O I �' I . O T I 4 • " ,x BINGO 3 AC ..1 d'. .7.e ` Fa I� In 2 a T 1 I— wir II �_I I �.L i— $D 6A.. q"::: s.v Ha �W 131 ti. Y W O Q ; pew r z I _ 1�'Ial R p.' t Q c, L-.-.-.nur-- -h I �11= 11 KOHL. a M W e a' a • ?r3atq'P.TING f I Cyr 2 — II���. I.. Pete 6 Delores Kohl W %'� S aax I Progressive Investment Co I r_f,„ , , , . :::, ,, a I 1? ° 111 K : f', LUSA.. 3 w Cr 1.1 °) 1 x . 'ti.ix= 7 t c, I n m I•I G a V.la�XAt46- R ® FakI II• Z1 X 0§. 1.V. Farrell I ¢ �^� {/.�� John V Farrell ✓'1 cl„% 1� O O Ili 1 w.f.- a+/' Jj 'i ,4V Aa _ 'N anisAi CO N a 34TH \ w ST. ® ^' J f • c y srok. ® / Q y 1.1 �$ fnU x i sxx I hiss \ Ce li ® U j In -W M1 00 x s C I� N lee0�,1 :�3- 3.31 ac .t yJ7f"ice%OSSA< 141 Q O F, 1 I I V�-RtJT 8 Emilie 'urotli a tee, .4)./ - W 1- N r3 n o. J 2 ec 41 /' IAI 'C/ . -1 4 ee.34 ,[ r7 et .1Q�� r. CA -a.e,- - ' ,— •-r.Ly.>'' iS. Px.._.a:.a,..,e.' 4 .Jt a lifis4,I NY(' 3 Z.?. GRAPHIC SCALE 0,1 •.•-7•••• s..7 •,. 'AIx._Ju3?_.._��' -' '-1V.,• ,1. _,Is 4. :;: i v zoo 0 100 200 400 e00 _ f •I.� DATE 7/6/01 qII y , �..4& D B U "f i L I N G TON --- it - ,• J 3 s 1 err, = zoo n. SCALE r - zoo' 7 1; 2 .va I v e ) • h'r f DESIGN 0Y: JJJ a 9P.OH-el i ��' si NAME SSE •'^ i (3) 2 lifI`. w+Wx.er: JJHoward _Hawkins n,I�.�' �_z N �IRTHERN I n'• JAEGER ENGINEERING me No. J 9419 South 204th Place SHEETKent, WA. 98031 Phone No. (253) 850-0934 OF 1 Fox No. (253) 850-0155 O p CITY OF RENTON `��� c'�!�1 �� _";�'' Planning/Building/Public Works ¢a �Oleo , • I. 1055 South Grady Way - Renton Washington 98055 WN AL 1 �2 fr` O3 5 u¢ PB METER * ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED 7123i39 U.S. POSTAGE ; �V Music&Youth Organization Imperials\� 2003 SE Maple Valley Hwyae Renton,WA 98055 h tom' f i ` { F6PLfbikt):$t*5 :4=� s 'l i hiiiiii!ii iiiiii!liaiwi:ifidulihni„i \: 310 Return Address: City Clerk's Office 11 0City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way00 Renton WA 98055 20021206001928 CITY OF RENTON BS 23.00 PAGE 001 OF 005 12/06/2002 12:53 KING COUNTY, WA Title: UTILITIES EASEMENT Property Tax Parcel Number: 3 O23Q —7O7O Project File#: ( U(\ 02— 075 v3033 Street Intersection or Project Name: ko NL Rv Sir RAGF_ Reference Number(s)of Documents assigned or released:Additional reference numbers are on page Grantor(s): Grantee(s): 1. D C. FRo ERTl E s 1. City of Renton, a Municipal Corporation 2 • The Grantor,as named above,for or and in consideration of mutual benefits,hereby grants,bargains,sells and delivers to the above named Grantee,the following described property. Additional legal is on page of document (Abbreviated legal description MUST go hue) tea. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A water utilities easement over a portion of the southeast quarter of Section 30, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, Willamette Meridian, in the N City of Renton, King County, Washington. ti r., See Exhibit "A" for a complete legal description -cZ) 2602 - 0013 • H:WORMSI}:CRECORDIEASEMENT.DOC1 Page 1 FORM 03 000lbhJCA2-21.97 That said Grantor(s),for and in consideration of mutual benefits,do by these presents,grant,bargain,sell, convey,and warrants unto the said Grantee,its successors and assigns,an easement for public utilities (including water,wastewater,and surface water)with necessary appurtenances over,under,through,across and upon the following described property(the right-of-way)in King County,Washington,more particularly described on page 1. (or if full legal is not on page 1—Exhibit A.) For the purpose of constructing,reconstructing, installing,repairing,replacing,enlarging,operating and maintaining utilities and utility pipelines, including,but not limited to,water,sewer and storm drainage lines, together with the right of ingress and egress thereto without prior institution of any suit or proceedings of law and without incurring any legal obligation or liability therefor. Following the initial construction of its facilities,Grantee may from time to time construct such additional facilities as it may require. This easement is granted subject to the following terms and conditions: 1. The Grantee shall,upon completion of any work within the property covered by the easement,restore the surface of the easement,and any private improvements disturbed or destroyed during execution of the work,as nearly as practicable to the condition they were in immediately before commencement of the work or entry by the Grantee. 2. Grantor shall retain the right to use the surface of the easement as long as such use does not interfere with the easement rights granted to the Grantee. Grantor shall not,however,have the right to: a. Erect or maintain any buildings or structures within the easement;or b. Plant trees,shrubs or vegetation having deep root patterns which may cause damage to or interfere with the utilities to be placed within the easement by the Grantee;or • c. Develop,landscape,or beautify the easement area in any way which would unreasonably increase the costs to the Grantee of restoring the easement area and any private improvements therein. d. Dig,tunnel or perform other forms of construction activities on the property which would disturb the tsa compaction or unearth Grantee's facilities on the right-of-way,or endanger the lateral support facilities. tom► e. Blast within fifteen(15)feet of the right-of-way. This easement shall run with the land described herein,and shall be binding upon the parties,their heirs, • successors in interest and assigns. Grantors covenant that they are the lawful owners of the above properties ..y and that they have a good and lawful right to execute this agreement. By this conveyance, Grantor will warrant and defend the sale hereby made unto the Grantee against all and r i every person or persons,whomsoever, lawfully claiming or to claim the same. This conveyance shall bind the heirs,executors, administrators and assigns forever. IN WITNESS�\ WHEREOF,said Grantor has caused this instrument to be executed this /0 day of �-t` Z .4 x eC l • INDIVIDUAL FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT Notary Seal must be within box STATE OF WASHINGTON )SS oliitift. COUNTY OF KING ) ‘`` tvLv,S/,''' I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that DEo EJ `. . f\5g1oN ( I A J 01J signed this instrument and Q � OTA41 acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes t o !•_ = mentioned in in t �j++„ PUBLIC) imAijelAk. ' �oN �t►�` Notary Public in d for the State of Washington „;�r►#` Notary(Print) 1'ANt' LUsAIN My appointment expires: -3 AN. 30, Dated: 10 —10-20622 2e c2-oc13 H:\FORMS\KCRECORDIEASEMENT.DOC\ Page 2 INDIVIDUAL FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT Notary Seal must be within box STATE OF WASHINGTON )SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary(Print) My appointment expires: Dated: REPRESENTATIVE FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT Notary Seal must be within box STATE OF WASHINGTON )SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument,on oath stated that he/she/they was/were authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the and of to be the free and voluntary act of such party/parties for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. ev. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary(Print) My appointment expires: Dated: • CORPORATE FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT Notary Seal must be within box STATE OF WASHINGTON )SS COUNTY OF KING ) On this day of , 19_,before me personally appeared _ I to me known to be of the corporation that executed the within instrument,and acknowledge the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation,for the uses and purposes therein mentioned,and each on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary(Print) My appointment expires: Dated: 2Co2.OD' J H:\FORMS\KCRECORD\EASEMENT.DOC1 Page 3 FORM 03 0000/bh/CA2-21-97 , EXHIBIT"A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION (Must be stamped by a P.E.or L.S.) LEGAL DESCRIPTION WATER MAIN EASEMENT KOHL RV STORAGE YARD That portion of the south half of the of the north half of the northwest quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 30, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W. M., in the City of Renton, King County, Washington, Lying west of the westerly margin of primary State Highway No. 5, as established by deed recorded under recording number 5346368; except that portion lying within the right-of-way for East Valley Highway, described as follows: Beginning at the northwest corner of the aforementioned parcel; Thence S 01° 50' 49" W, 48.50 ft. to the Point of Beginning. Thence S 89° 31 ' 56" E, 295.55 ft., thence N 00° 28' 04" E, 15.00 ft., thence S 89° 31 ' 56" E, 10.00 ft., thence S 00° 28' 03" W, 15.00 ft., thence S 89° 31 ' 56" E, 158.63 ft., thence S 02° 54' 00" W, 226.07 ft., thence N 89° 27' 34" W, 460.01 ff., thence N 01° 50 49" E, 15.00 ft., thence S 89° 27' 34" E, 110.91 ft., thence N c v 00° 32' 26" E, 20.00 ft., thence S 89° 27' 34" E, 10.00 ft., thence S 00° 32' 26" W, 20.00 ft., thence S 89° 27' 34" E, 324.36 ft., thence N 02° 54' 00" E, 196.02 ft., thence N 89° 31 ' 56" W, 426.27 ft., thence S 00° 28' 04" W, 10.00 ft., thence N 89° 31 ' 56" W, 10.00 ft., thence N 00° 28' 04" E, 10.00 ft., CV thence N 89° 31 ' 56" W, 12.49 ft., thence N 01° 50' 49" E, 15.00 ft. to the — Point of Beginning. (=> -i@ Of WAS: G', ,:'. , zo. - A • •! . , , 9 - c:-, ;„ 0 ,\ 24t4,44 3,,4 0, .4., . loiv tcta e+1L ms , 1ojl ` I6/71 zoo zoo-2. -c t' H:\FORMST.CRECORDWASEMENT.DOC1 Page 4 FORM 03 0000/bh/CA2-21-97 . Map Exhibit 1, • I -- S 89' 31' 57' E 548.08' ---------------------- .-- 10.. -1 I IS' PUBUC WATER EASEMENT (TYP) r1 to 1 L J L. I l J O 1-Li r. T -- I 1 10'— I I qlI I I OIin i I II PO N 1 O 1 I 'M ZI I I I W CO ~ ;.� `=100' ,°�' SCALE: 1 CI ! vril 10' I n 1 1la ►71 J lc�V f1S. PUBUC WATER EASEMENT (TYP) J I N .— p %Mkk I IZ I C=II I01 t„ ! N 89' 27' 35` W 541.99' .1=3 . 1 • Zoo'L-cog 3 H:1FORMSTCR.ECORDEASERIENT.D0C1 Page 5 FORM 03 0000/bh/CA2-21-97 CITY IF RENTON Planning/Building/PublicWorks Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman RE.,Administrator September 3, 2002 Mr. James Jaeger Jaeger Engineering 9419 South 204th Place Kent, WA 98031 SUBJECT: Kohl R.V. and Boat Storage Project No. LUA-02-079, CU-A, SA-A, ECF Dear Mr. Jaeger: This letter is to inform you that the appeal period has ended for the Environmental Review Committee's (ERC) Determination of Non-Significance — Mitigated, Administrative Conditional Use Permit and Administrative Site Plan for the above-referenced project. No appeals were tiled. This decision is final and application for the appropriately required permits may proceed. The applicant must comply with all ERC Mitigation Measures and Conditions of Approval in accordance with the City of Renton Staff Report and Decision dated August 6, 2002. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (425) 430-7219. Sincerely, 1 S j Jason E. Jordan Associate Planner cc: DC Properties/Owner Carl Magnuson/Party of Record 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 RENTON ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE r AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Barbara Alther, first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of the SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION 600 S.Washington Avenue,Kent,Washington 98032 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON,WASHINGTON a daily newspaper published seven(7)times a week. Said newspaper is a legal newspaper of The Environmental Review general publication and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of Committee has issued a Determination of Non-Significance- publication, referred to, printed and published in the English language continually as a daily Mitigated for the following project newspaper in Kent, King County,Washington. The South County Journal has been approved as a under the authority of the Renton i legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the South County Journal(and Municipal Code. not in supplemental form)which was regularly distributed to the subscribers during the below KOHL RV AND BOAT STORAGE stated period. The annexed notice, a Construction o anewECF Construction of new RV and boat storage facility. Location: Kohl RV&Boat Storage 3328 East Valley Road. Appeals of either the environmental as published on: 8/12/02 determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of$66.75,charged to on or before 5:00 PM August 26, Acct. No. 8051067. 2002. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. The cost above includes a$6.00 fee for the printing of the affidavits. Appeals must be id .00 together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Legal Number 10689 Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 SoutA�� l�� '� 9805h Grady Way, Renton,xami WA /4�(//j 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Legal Clerk, South County Journal Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained Subscribed and sworn before me on this from the'Renton City Clerk's Office, ��day of /0!/ ,2002 (425)430-6510. aa'ttooIIstri ' , da. Published in the South County s`•N t..•N M FF4,o0'o / i I far-- c Journal August 12,2002.10689 ` ��,��°gsioN Fxp4... *.1m� Notary Public of the State f Washin on �:`c, V..Q; residing in Renton 4`` ‘�0 Ti R y us> King County,Washington Z ••,pq pint°� t,: a "10 a�� a O4dauaaiaiiaittaa+ i NO•11,CE ENVIRONMENTAL&ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION Posted to Notify Interested Persons of an Environmental and Administrative Action KOHL RV AND BOAT STORAGE LUA-02.079,CU-A,SA-A,EC F The applicant is requesting Environmental(SEPA)Review,Administrative Conditional Use Permit and Administrative Site Plan Approval for the construction of a new RV and boat storage facility.The storage facility would include seven buildings totaling approximately 60,000 square feet of building/covered storage area and approximately 21,000 square feat of outdoor storage area. Specifically,the applicant has proposed a total of 174 storage spaces,of which 111 would be covered and 63 would be open. Access to the project Is proposed from two driveways off of East Valley Road.Location:3328 East Valley Road. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE(ERC)HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT AND HAS ISSUED A DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (DNS-M). AN ADMINISTRATIVE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT(CU-A)AND SITE PLAN APPROVAL(SA-A)HAS BEEN ISSUED. APPEALS OF EITHER THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION[RCW 43.21.0075(3),WAC 197-11-680]AND/OR THE LAND USE DECISION MUST BE FILED IN WRITING ON OR BEFORE 5:00 PM AUGUST 26, 2002. IF NO APPEALS ARE FILED BY THIS DATE,BOTH ACTIONS WILL BECOME FINAL. APPEALS MUST BE FILED IN WRITING TOGETHER WITH THE REQUIRED$75.00 APPLICATION FEE WITH: HEARING EXAMINER,CITY OF RENTON,1055 SOUTH GRADY WAY,RENTON,WA 98055. APPEALS TO THE EXAMINER ARE GOVERNED BY CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 4-8-110. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE APPEAL PROCESS MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE RENTON CITY CLERK'S OFFICE,(425)430.6510. FOR ADDITONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE ADOPTED MITIGATION MEASURES AND/OR CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL,PLEASE CONTACT THE PROJECT MANAGER,JASON E.JORDAN,AT(425)430-7219. MIME 10, IMin MEW . I� It. ca C S1\ ICI �I Ial IE I� sak�}^K I g31g MCAW 1 M M.M,M M �•i - t.7 " TZECEn Ewc„aEEw,r.c DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please Include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. MARILYN KAMCHEFF 1 CERTIFICATION ' NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF WASHINGTON COMMISSION EXPIRES JUNE 29, 2003 11. I, E CdA , hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document were posted by me in conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on 222 _ • Signed: ATTEST: Subscribed an worn before me,a Notary Public, in and for the to of Washington residing ii sQ-A S-r1 ,on the 2 2-..7.. t day of Of 4. ZOOZ MARILYN KAMCHEFF MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES:6-29 03 Proposed Mitigation Measures: & Y O� 1. The applicant will be required to pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee based on$0.52 per square toot of new construction. L� ' 2. The applicant will be required to pay the appropriate Traffic Mitigation Fee based on$75 per net new average daily trip • associated with the project. ,,t� 3. Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Measures shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of e rLiNv�. representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project. 4. The applicant will be required to follow the recommendations contained with the Geotechn'Ical Engineering Study prepared for this protect with regard to the disturbance,preparation and construction of the site. NOTICE OF APPLICATION Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Jason E.Jordan,Associate Planner,Development AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON- Services Division,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on July 24,2002.It you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail,contact me Project Manager. • SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED(DNS-M) Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a parry of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: JASON E.JORDAN (425)430-7219 • DATE: July 10,2002 PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-02-079,CU-A,ECF,SA-A 'bpF APPLICATION NAME: KOHL RV AND BOAT STORAGE I,F PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant,Kohl Excavating,has requested to construct a RV end Boat A Storage area.The application will require environmental review(SEPA),an Administrative Conditional Use Permit end Administrative Site Plan Review approval. The proposed RV end Boat storage area has been designed to - _ I Include six covered storage buildings(totaling approximately 60,968 square feet)containing 113 storage spaces - ) �1 1L I and 67 uncovered storage spaces.The covered storage stalls are proposed to be 12 feet wide by 40 feet long end • _ 6 ! llet 'i f a i the uncovered storage stalls are proposed at 12 feet wide by 22 feet long. An existing 1,600 square foot office Is I 1 F�� }'�/ proposed to remain in the southwest corner of the property. Access to the site Is proposed from East Valley >i I Z I 1 i�Ij. ¢ ��� Road. — • 1��;��I .yam "Iv ��/) 1 PROJECT LOCATION: 3330 East Valley Road F�I I�OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE,MITIGATED(DNS-M):As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton 13 'uaIII 111[. ^R r: -., has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project.Therefore,as j „ 'm 1Q < a permitted under the RCW 43.21 C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS-M process to give notice that a DNS- I I t n t `I y ' M is likely to be Issued.Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment �lTix\., k 5 period.There will be no comment period following the Issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance- 1 I i 7R.F: g..g Mitigated(DNS-M).A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. _ ill PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: June 27,2002 I eel 1 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: July 10,2002 JI i : _ 111 1 r.C... ( Mr: @aI ,' !Permits/Review Requested: Environmental(SEPA)Review,Administrative Contlitional Use Permit, �`�`G J I 91 1 Administrative Site Plan Review w�Y IsOther Permits which may be required: City of Renton Building&Construction Permits - a11. 0111*i,,X' Y 3d jRequested Studies: WA lFv': -�rrJ,�tF , . • �$ Location where application may s e• u s o s— -.�i f, Nz5. .a` ..._. - i be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, I T,M ))1 .y,,.;I[ 1 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 I tJ a I'Mr "` 7x7 F JAEGER ENGINEERING PUBLIC HEARING: N/A ` - .-awe~.. CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Analytical process Land Use: The subject site is designated Employment Area-Valley(EAV)on the Citys Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map and Commercial Arterial(CA)or the Citys Zoning Map.The proposed use of the site,as a vehicle storage facility,is considered en AdminlstratNe Conditional Use in the CA zone. If you would like to be made a party of record to receive turther information on this proposed project,complete this form and return to:City of Renton,Development Planning,1055 So.Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055. Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Protect: Geotechnical Study,Traffic Study&Drainage Report File No/Name: LUA-02-079,CU-A,SA-A,ECF/KOHL RV&BOAT STORAGE Development Regulations NAME: Used For Project Mitigation: The project will be subject to the Citys SEPA Ordinance,Zoning Code,Public Works Standards,Uniform Building Code,Uniform Fire Code,and other ADDRESS: applicable codes and regulations as appropriate. • TELEPHONE NO.: NOTICE OF APPLICATION • NOTICE OF APPLICATION I MARILYN KAMCHEFF NOTARY PUBLIC CERTIFICATION STATE OF WASHINGTON i COMMISSION EXPIRES JUNE 29, 2003 I, lit , hereby certify that copies of the 1 above document were posted by me in conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on _ t j 101?i2Q7 t SignedOU I�� ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn before me,a Notary Public,in and for the tale of Washington residing int er 4-v\ ,on the 2Z day of GC u Zt007.— 1 (� I I '1 RILYN KAMCHEFF :NTMENT EXPIRES:6-29-03 CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the day of /4. t , 2002, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope contain pg documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing • ,e" ' (Signature of Sender) , STATE OF WASHINGTON ) Si SS COUNTY OF KING ) certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that 41) ✓e& De �a uw signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: ?a, n MAR4LYP KAIICHEFF ► Notary Public and for the State of Washincitbih ei NOTARY PUBLIC Notary(Print) STATE OF WASHINGTON en" KAMCHEFF COMMISSION EXPIRES My appointment a it JUNE 29, 2003 Project Name: I(.p 4 I 1 U a v.ci Project Number: L uil 0 z- -079 , Gu- /�_ ft rC F NOTARY.DOC ' I II AGENCY(DOE) LETTER MAILING (ERC DETERMINATIONS) Dept. of Ecology Larry Fisher Mr. Rod Malcom, Fisheries Environmental Review Section WA Dpt. Of Fish &Wildlife Muckleshoot Indian Tribe PO Box 47703 C/o Dept. of Ecology 39015—172nd Avenue SE Olympia,WA 98504-7703 3190— 160th Ave. SE Auburn, WA 98092 Bellevue,WA 98008 WSDOT Northwest Region Duwamish Tribal Office Mr. David Dietzman King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240 14235 Ambaum Blvd. SW—Front A Dept. of Natural Resources PO Box 330310 Burien,WA 98166 PO Box 47015 Seattle,WA 98133-9710 Olympia,WA 98504-7015 US Army Corp. of Engineers Ms. Shirley Marroquin Eric Swennson Seattle District Office Environmental Planning Supervisor Seattle Public Utilities PO Box C-3755 KC Wastewater Treatment Division 710—2nd Avenue, 10th Floor Seattle,WA 98124 201 South Jackson St, MS KSC-NR-050 Seattle, WA 98104 Attn: SEPA Reviewer Seattle,WA 98104-3855 KC Dev. & Environmental Serv. City of Newcastle City of Kent Attn: SEPA Section Attn: Mr. Micheal E. Nicholson Attn: Mr. Fred Satterstrom, AICP 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Director of Community Development Acting Community Dev. Director Renton, WA 98055-1219 13020 SE 72nd Place 220 Fourth Avenue South Newcastle,WA 98059 Kent,WA 98032-5895 Gary Kriedt Joe Jainga Metro Environmental Planning PSE—Municipal Land Planner KSC-TR-0431 PO Box 90868 201 South Jackson Street Ms: XRD-01W Seattle,WA 98104 Bellevue,WA 98009-0868 10, Last printed 11/19/01 11:34 AM V CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING ( ( On the O day of 111H , 2002, I deposited in the mails of the United State -,)a sealed envelope containing documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing �J 1i' v �� �'.� 4 <1 ( /. ✓ i • (Signature of Sender) STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) �l certifyI that I know or have satisfactoryevidence that /-/r�ci r0 e j J< Ba.-44 (^Jsigned this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: # , Zd _ op_ 17n C '4 MARL KAMCI-iEFF ► Notary Pub'c in and for the State of Washington NOTARY PUBLIC ► Notary(Print) MARILYN I(AMCHEFF STATE OF WASHINGTON ► My appointment a ,pirAp COMMISSION EXPIRES JUNE 29, 2003 r - Project Name: K I 1 U .rt 6.„sue Project Number: (—GI 141 D 1 0•,o ( u - s/ -A (P NOTARY.DOC • NooricE ENVIRONMENTAL & ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION Posted to Notify Interested Persons of an Environmental and Administrative Action KOHL RV AND BOAT STORAGE LUA-02-079,CU-A,SA-A,ECF The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review, Administrative Conditional Use Permit and Administrative Site Plan Approval for the construction of a new RV and boat storage facility. The storage facility would include seven buildings totaling approximately 60,000 square feet of building/covered storage area and approximately 21,000 square feet of outdoor storage area. Specifically, the applicant has proposed a total of 174 storage spaces, of which 111 would be covered and 63 would be open. Access to the project is proposed from two driveways off of East Valley Road. Location:3328 East Valley Road. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE(ERC)HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT AND HAS ISSUED A DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (DNS-M). AN ADMINISTRATIVE CONDITIONAL USE . PERMIT(CU-A)AND SITE PLAN APPROVAL(SA-A)HAS BEEN ISSUED. APPEALS OF EITHER THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] AND/OR THE LAND USE DECISION MUST BE FILED IN WRITING ON OR BEFORE 5:00 PM AUGUST 26, 2002. IF NO APPEALS ARE FILED BY THIS DATE, BOTH ACTIONS WILL BECOME FINAL. APPEALS MUST BE FILED IN WRITING TOGETHER WITH THE REQUIRED $75.00 APPLICATION FEE WITH: HEARING EXAMINER, CITY OF RENTON, 1055 SOUTH GRADY WAY, RENTON, WA 98055. APPEALS TO THE EXAMINER ARE GOVERNED BY •I CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 4-8-110. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE APPEAL PROCESS MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE RENTON CITY CLERK'S OFFICE,(425)430-6510. FOR ADDITONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE ADOPTED MITIGATION MEASURES AND/OR CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL,PLEASE CONTACT THE PROJECT MANAGER,JASON E.JORDAN,AT(425)430-7219. .I _ ' 1"e gt : a 1 , J o i—• w7--4' j -0 I' t i w W . i...c-1 L R 6r-• ... 'j Q 11z.c III ...-. ; 8.. "'. .1 ,�'Q,\ S• - @ ux I `_ - _ r �1 tit t , ,_ r _ ImoI ...,; :.Ii 7 : *, ! 11 rM r\ '$i` 7' ;'2 u, fl II - Ii,. „ , o—S o ' Ill a €€l ITE. .,... ,..,�1 S • r. '5 s i 1�E75 , e r ---."-- ' I i,°\-,"4:" i X ii iI "� x tr 1.1N I 1y 6'P GRAPHIC SCALE ',►_ _ara'.._._ i .4 VS: ii V :.ifin T err r B U 7' L I N 0 T O N --- / / ,,4� �u.-n �°�200. M _ I V_ .-, 1 I �� . V 1y� _i N C B TIN E B N - �".. M1."17 I JAEGER ENGINEERING :— h DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON,WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee has issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. KOHL RV AND BOAT STORAGE LUA-02-079,CU-A,SA-A,ECF Construction of a new RV and boat storage facility. Location: 3328 East Valley Road. Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM August 26, 2002. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. Publication Date: August 12, 2002 Account No. 51067 • f ii dnsmpub.dot I „ CITY F RF,NTON Plannin i g/Bu ldmg/PubltcWorks Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator August 8, 2002 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Subject: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on August 6, 2002: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED KOHL RV AND BOAT STORAGE LUA-02-079,C U-A,SA-A,ECF The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review, Administrative Conditional Use Permit and Administrative Site Plan Approval for the construction of a new RV and boat storage facility. The storage facility would include seven buildings totaling approximately 60,000 square feet of building/covered storage area and approximately 21,000 square feet of outdoor storage area. Specifically, the applicant has proposed a total of 174 storage spaces, of which 111 would be covered and 63 would be open. Access to the project is proposed from two driveways off of East Valley Road. Location: 3328 East Valley Road. Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM August 26, 2002. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required$75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. If you have questions, please call me at (425) 430-7219. For the Environmental Review Committee, i5 son . Jor an Associate Planner. cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division Larry Fisher, Department of Fisheries David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources WSDOT, Northwest Region Duwamish Tribal Office Rod Malcom, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (Ordinance) US Army Corp. of Engineers Enclosure 1055 South Grad Way-Renton,Washington 98055 RENTON Agency Letter\ AHEAD OF THE CURVE This paper contains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES & CONDITIONS APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-02-079, CU-A, SA-A, ECF APPLICANT: Kohl Excavating PROJECT NAME: Kohl RV and Boat Storage DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review, Administrative Conditional Use Permit and Administrative Site Plan Approval for the construction of a new RV and boat storage facility. The storage facility would include seven buildings totaling approximately 60,000 square feet of building/covered storage area and approximately 21,000 square feet of outdoor storage area. Specifically, the applicant has proposed a total of 174 storage spaces, of which 111 would be covered and 63 would be open. Access to the project is proposed from two driveways off of East Valley Road LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 3328 East Valley Road MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. The applicant shall follow the recommendations contained within the Geotechnical Engineering Report dated August 30, 2001, prepared by Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc. with regard to the disturbance, preparation and construction of the site. 2. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Traffic Mitigation Fee based on a rate of $75.00 for each new average weekday trip attributable to the project prior to the issuance of building and construction permits. 3. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee based on a rate of $0.52 per square foot of new commercial building area and is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. CONDITIONS: The Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Review for the Kohl RV & Boat Storage Facility, File No. LUA-02-079, CU-A, SA-A, ECF, is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall provide on-site parking signage, which identifies the guest/employee stalls and indicates that they are not for lease. This condition shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of final occupancy permits. 2. The applicant shall provide three additional Western Red Cedar Trees to be planted near the subject site's northeastern property corner. This condition shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of building permits. mitigationmeasures CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-02-079, CU-A, SA-A, ECF APPLICANT: Kohl Excavating PROJECT NAME: Kohl RV and Boat Storage DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review, Administrative Conditional Use Permit and Administrative Site Plan Approval for the construction of a new RV rI and boat storage facility. The storage facility would include seven buildings totaling approximately 60,000 square feet of building/covered storage area-and approximately 21,000 square feet of outdoor storage area. Specifically, the applicant has proposed a total of 174 storage spaces, of which 111 would be covered and 63 would be open. Access to the project is proposed from two driveways off of East Valley Road LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 3328 East Valley Road LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM August 26, 2002. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430- 6510. PUBLICATION DATE: August 12, 2002 DATE OF DECISION: August 6, 2002 SIGNATURES: m m�' Ac m nfi Gregg gg m istrator-6z--- DATE Departme t tfP(anning/Building/PublicAO 2- Works Jim epherd, Administrator DATE Co unity Services 09- Leevrueler, ire Chiel DATE Renton Fire Department dnsmsign •• i-,4111i1, CITY 1 F RENTON Planning/Building/PublicWorks Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator August 8, 2002 Mr.James Jaeger Jaeger Engineering 9419 South 204th Place Kent, WA 98031 SUBJECT: Kohl R.V. and Boat Storage i Project No. LUA-02-079, CU-A, SA-A, ECF Dear Mr. Jaeger: i This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) and is to advise you that they have completed their review of the subject project. The ERC issued a threshold Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with Mitigation Measures. Please refer to the enclosed Mitigation Measures document. Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM August 26, 2002. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. The preceding information will assist you in planning for implementation of your project and enable you to exercise your appeal rights more fully, if you choose to do so. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at(425)430-7219. For the Environmental Review Committee, Jason . Jordan Associate Planner ; cc: DC Properties/Owner Carl Magnuson/Party of Record Enclosure 1 ansmleuer 1055 South Grad Way-Renton,Washington 98055 R E N T O N AHEAD OF THE CURVE This paper contains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES & CONDITIONS APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-02-079, CU-A, SA-A, ECF APPLICANT: Kohl Excavating PROJECT NAME: Kohl RV and Boat Storage DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review, Administrative Conditional Use Permit and Administrative Site Plan Approval for the construction of a new RV and boat storage facility. The storage facility would include seven buildings totaling approximately 60,000 square feet of building/covered storage area and approximately 21,000 square feet of outdoor storage area. Specifically, the applicant has proposed a total of 174 storage spaces, of which 111 would be covered and 63 would be open. Access to the project is proposed from two driveways off of East Valley Road LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 3328 East Valley Road MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. The applicant shall follow the recommendations contained within the Geotechnical Engineering Report dated August 30, 2001, prepared by Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc. with regard to the disturbance, preparation and construction of the site. 2. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Traffic Mitigation Fee based on a rate of $75.00 for each new average weekday trip attributable to the project prior to the issuance of building and construction permits. 3. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee based on a rate of $0.52 per square foot of new commercial building area and is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. CONDITIONS: The Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Review for the Kohl RV & Boat Storage Facility, File No. LUA-02-079, CU-A, SA-A, ECF, is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall provide on-site parking signage, which identifies the guest/employee stalls and indicates that they are not for lease. This condition shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of final occupancy permits. 2. The applicant shall provide three additional Western Red Cedar Trees to be planted near the subject site's northeastern property corner. This condition shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of building permits. mitigationmeasures CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-02-079, CU-A, SA-A, ECF APPLICANT: Kohl Excavating PROJECT NAME: Kohl RV and Boat Storage DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review, Administrative Conditional Use Permit and Administrative Site Plan Approval for the construction of a new RV and boat storage facility. The storage facility would include seven buildings totaling approximately 60,000 square feet of building/covered storage area and approximately 21,000 square feet of outdoor storage area. Specifically, the applicant has proposed a total of 174 storage spaces, of which 111 would be covered and 63 would be open. Access to the project is proposed from two driveways off of East Valley Road LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 3328 East Valley Road LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM August 26, 2002. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430- 6510. PUBLICATION DATE: August 12, 2002 DATE OF DECISION: August 6, 2002 SIGNATURES: )2 Gregglim� m , Acinn of-istrator DATE De artmev`t f P annin /Buildin /Public Works p � 9 9 eyve)4____ f Jim epherd, Administrator 6AT Co unity Services Lee� ftse"le, ire Chie DATE Renton Fire Department dnsmsign CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES & CONDITIONS APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-02-079, CU-A, SA-A, ECF APPLICANT: Kohl Excavating PROJECT NAME: Kohl RV and Boat Storage DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review, Administrative Conditional Use Permit and Administrative Site Plan Approval for the construction of a new RV and boat storage facility. The storage facility would include seven buildings totaling approximately 60,000 square feet of building/covered storage area and approximately 21,000 square feet of outdoor storage area. Specifically, the applicant has proposed a total of 174 storage spaces, of which 111 would be covered and 63 would be open. Access to the project is proposed from two driveways off of East Valley Road LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 3328 East Valley Road MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. The applicant shall follow the recommendations contained within the Geotechnical Engineering Report dated August 30, 2001, prepared by Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc. with regard to the disturbance, preparation and construction of the site. 2. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Traffic Mitigation Fee based on a rate of $75.00 for each new average weekday trip attributable to the project prior to the issuance of building and construction permits. 3. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee based on a rate of $0.52 per square foot of new commercial building area and is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. CONDITIONS: The Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Review for the Kohl RV & Boat Storage Facility, File No. LUA-02-079, CU-A, SA-A, ECF, is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall provide on-site parking signage, which identifies the guest/employee stalls and indicates that they are not for lease. This condition shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of final occupancy permits. i 2. The applicant shall provide three additional Western Red Cedar Trees to be planted near the subject site's northeastern property corner. This condition shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of building permits. ii mitigationmeasures ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING NOTICE AUGUST 6, 2002 CONSENT AGENDA To: Gregg Zimmerman, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator Jim Shepherd, Community Services Administrator Lee Wheeler, Fire Chief From: Jennifer Henning, Development Planning Meeting Date: Tuesday, August 6, 2002 Time: 9:00 AM Location: Sixth Floor Conference Room #620 Agenda listed below. • - Kohl RV& Boat Storage (Jordan) L UA-02-079,CU-A,SA-A,ECF The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review, Administrative Conditional Use Permit and Administrative Site Plan Approval for the construction of a new RV and boat storage facility. The storage facility would include seven buildings totaling approximately 60,000 square feet of building/covered storage area and approximately 21,000 square feet of outdoor storage area. Specifically, the applicant has proposed a total of 174 storage spaces, of which 111 would be covered and 63 would be open. Access to the project is proposed from two driveways off of East Valley Road. Location: 3328 East Valley Road. i cc: J.Tanner,Mayor J.Covington,Chief Administrative Officer S.Carlson, EDNSP Administrator A Pietsch,EDNSP Director J.Gray, Fire Prevention N.Watts, P/B/PW Development Services Director ® F.Kaufman, Hearing Examiner L.Rude,Fire Prevention ® J.Medzegian,Council S. Meyer, P/B/PW Transportation Systems Director R.Lind, Economic Development L.Warren,City Attorney ® i REPORT City of Renton i Department of Planning/Building/Public Works DECISION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW& ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION REPORT DATE: August 6, 2002 ➢ Project Name: Kohl RV & Boat Storage Applicant: Kohl Excavating 3330 East Valley Road Renton, WA 98055 File Number: LUA-02-079, CU-A, SA-A & ECF Project Manager: Jason E. Jordan If Project Description: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review, Administrative Conditional Use Permit and Administrative Site Plan Approval for the construction of a new RV and boat storage facility. The storage facility would include seven buildings totaling approximately 60,000 square feet of building/covered storage area and approximately 21,000 square feet of outdoor storage area. Specifically, the applicant has proposed a total of 174 storage spaces, of which 111 would be covered and 63 would be open. Access to the project is proposed from two driveways off of East Valley Road. Project Location: 3328 East Valley Road Exist. Bldg. Area SF: 1,600 square feet Proposed New Bldg. Area SF: 60,086 square feet (existing office) (storage area) Site Area: 4.13-acres (179,903 Total Building Area SF: 61,686 square feet square feet) I 1 - p ad i . Ts7,4\w ce� s o ' W .o a ll 6 a �— 6avrf {i o I4..... ri$ Q r� G 66t 26T.. , .mow. .-- ° �,... �..� o. .. 6 j,,. LIA `6 i�� < .- I.4 ue il7 N6 B I1 f ' L''a i 1 -, I. Ac 5 it ' �' '' I 6 � I o �6 Jr-jll r Y .. l SITE - ...ra.. ,...�..I . i 6 I'Im ill z 1 r Re 1'B _ I /�' ' u. y ,;1 • ilik...js, 1 ..,.. f,t II } © trft. y t R ; �] iA 7"77F i cwwwc SCALE L I N G T O N 'i '�+ . i1 _• I is IV C N g R T N E R N .7 — w.�.. 3 JAEGER ENGINEERING 9.+rfM m 1a+n vi 1- 980J1� +o.(16JJ ef9 . _- rc.Mo.l36JJ A58-035 Project Location Map sit,cup&erc.doc ' City of Renton P/B/PW DepartmentAdmini: ve Conditional Use,Administrative Site Plan, oval& Environmental Review Committee Staff Report r� KOHL RV&BOAT STORAGE BUILDING LUA-02-079, CU-A,SA-A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF AUGUST 6,2002 Page 3 of 14 Plan and Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan prior to the issuance of construction permits. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall follow the recommendations contained within the Geotechnical Engineering Report dated November 8, 1999, prepared by Bergquist Engineering Services with regard to the soil disturbance, preparation and construction of the site. Policy Nexus: SEPA Environmental Regulations (2) Water Impacts: There are no surface water bodies nor wetlands located on the site or in the immediate vicinity of the site. Upon completion of the project, approximately 87% of the site would be covered with impervious surfaces. Drainage from the proposed RV & boat storage facility would be directed into the existing storm water system, while ground surface run-off will be directed to a separate basin with a high quality oil/water separator. Storm detention and water quality will be designed to meet minimum City requirements prior to the issuance of construction permits. The storm water run-off from the proposed development would be routed into a collection and conveyance system, located adjacent to Statue Route 167. The project would be subject to the 1990 King County, Washington Surface Water Design Manual, as modified by the City of Renton. The system will be sized to match the 100-year post-development 24-hour storm event through the detention system. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation is recommended. Policy Nexus: N/A (3) Transportation Impacts: According to the Traffic Impact Analysis submitted with the application, prepared by Christopher Brown & Associates, dated June 25, 2002, the proposal is consistent with current City transportation policy and is planned in a matter that is safe and efficient with existing traffic patterns in the area. The report indicates that the proposal, once completed, would likely create less trips that the construction storage yard operation currently in use. Therefore, the applicant concludes that a traffic impact fee is not required. However, staff has determined that the contractor's storage yard was never an approved use at the site; therefore, the applicant is subject to the traffic impact fees associated with the proposed development. The report indicates that the proposal would result in 19 traffic trips generated by this proposal onto the City's street system. Therefore, staff recommends that the applicant be required to pay a traffic mitigation fee. The Traffic Mitigation Fee is calculated at a rate of $75.00 per net new average daily trip associated with the project. The fee for this proposal is estimated at $1,425.00 (19 daily trips x $75.00 = $1,425.00). The fee is payable prior to the issuance of building or construction permits. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall pay the appropriate Traffic Mitigation Fee based on a rate of $75.00 for each new average weekday trip attributable to the project prior to the issuance of building and construction permits. I Policy Nexus: SEPA Environmental Regulations; Transportation Mitigation Fee Resolution No. 3100, Ordinance 4527 (4) Fire/ Emergency Services Impacts: The proposal would create 60,085 square feet of new commercial building area, which would potentially impact the City's Fire Emergency Services. Therefore, a Fire Mitigation Fee based Hi on a rate of $0.52 per square foot of new commercial building area would be required. The fee is estimated at $31,244.20 ($0.52 x 60,085 commercial square feet = $31,244.20) and is payable prior 1 to issuance of the building permits. sit,cup&erc.doc • City of Renton P/B/PW DepartmentAdmini: re Conditional Use,Administrative Site Plan i ,val& Environmental Review Committee Staff Report KOHL RV&BOAT STORAGE BUILDING LUA-02-079, CU-A,SA-A, ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF AUGUST 6,2002 Page 2 of 14 PART ONE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND The applicant, Kohl Excavating, is requesting Administrative Conditional Use Permit, Administrative Site Plan Approval and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the construction of a new recreational vehicle (RV) & boat storage facility. The complex would contain seven separate storage buildings containing approximately 60,000 square feet of storage space. The buildings would provide 111 covered storage stalls. The applicant has also proposed to provide approximately 63 uncovered storage stalls totaling approximately 21,000 square feet in area. The proposal would be located on the east side of East Valley Road, between SW 29th Street and SW 34th Street. The proposed storage buildings would be one story and approximately 17 feet in height. The perimeter buildings are proposed to be secure buildings consisting of metal walls on all four sides; however, the center buildings (G & F) have been designed with no exterior walls and would look more like a large carport structure. The site has currently been used as a contractor's storage yard. In addition, there is an existing 1,600 square foot office building, which is proposed to remain. The office building is located in the southwest corner of the property. The proposal includes associated improvements, including parking areas, landscaping, and utilities. The proposal, when completed, would generate a 87% impervious surface area, while connecting all storm water runoff into the City's existing storm drainage system. Project construction is planned to begin in late summer and end prior to the winter season of this year. PART TWO: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW In compliance with RCW 43.21C.240, the following project environmental review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. A. Environmental Impacts The Proposal was circulated and reviewed by various City Departments and Divisions to determine whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed development. Staff reviewers have identified that the proposal is likely to have the following probable impacts: (1) Earth l Impacts: The subject site is relatively flat, with minimal slope from the west to east, with a total relief of approximately 4 feet. Overall, the site slopes at less than 1 percent. Currently, the property is used as a contractor's storage yard with an existing 1,600 square foot office building located in the southwest corner of the site. According to the Geotechnical Report submitted with the application, prepared by Bergquist Engineering Services dated November 8, 1999, the soils consist of sandy gravel fill to a depth of one to one and one-half feet. Beyond the sandy layer, additional fill was found consisting of dark brown, silt sand and gravel with cobbles, broken concrete lumber and other i miscellaneous debris. Underlying this fill is two to four feet of thick brown peat. The report states that building foundations can be supported through the use of conventional spread footing foundation systems with at least a 3-foot-thick layer of well-compacted granular fill under all foundations, slabs, and pavement surfaces. The Geotechnical Report includes several recommendations regarding site preparation, foundations, and structural and utility designs — all of 1 which staff will recommend the applicant comply with in order to mitigate potential erosion impacts to the site. The proposal would require typical excavation work for the installation of utilities and the importation of fill material. Potential erosion impacts that may result from the proposed grading activities would be mitigated by existing code provisions, which require the approval of a Construction Mitigation '' sit,cup&erc • City of Renton P/B/PW DepartmentAdmini; ie Conditional Use,Administrative Site Plan i )val& Environmental Review Committee Staff Report KOHL RV&BOAT STORAGE BUILDING LUA-02-079, CU-A,SA-A, ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF AUGUST 6,2002 Page 4 of 14 Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee based on a rate of $0.52 per square foot of new commercial building area and is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. Policy Nexus: SEPA Environmental Regulations; Fire Mitigation Fee Resolution No. 2913, Ordinance 4527 B. Recommendation Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINATION OF DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE XX NON—SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS-M with 14 day Appeal XX Period. C. Mitigation Measures 1. The applicant shall follow the recommendations contained within the Geotechnical Engineering Report dated August 30, 2001, prepared by Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc. with regard to the disturbance, preparation and construction of the site. 2. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Traffic Mitigation Fee based on a rate of $75.00 for each new average weekday trip attributable to the project prior to the issuance of building and construction permits. 3. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee based on a rate of $0.52 per square foot of new commercial building area and is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. PART THREE: ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION - REPORT & DECISION This decision on the administrative land use action is made concurrently with the environmental determination. A. Type of Land Use Action XX Site Plan Review Shoreline Substantial Development Permit XX Conditional Use Binding Site Plan Special Permit for Grade& Fill Administrative Code Determination B. Exhibits The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Project (yellow) file containing: application, proof of posting and publication, environmental review and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No. 2: Drawing No. C1, Site Plan & Elevations (Received July 30, 2002) Exhibit No. 3: Drawing No. L-1, Landscape Plan (Received June 27, 2002) Exhibit No. 4: Drawing No. C2, Drainage and Paving Plan (Received June 27, 2002) Exhibit No. 5: Drawing No. 1 Neighborhood Detail Map (Received June 27, 2002) Exhibit No. 6: Page H3W of the City of Renton Zoning Map Book sit,cup&erc.doc ' City of Renton P/B/PW DepartmentAdminis 'e Conditional Use,Administrative Site Plan I. val& Environmental Review Committee Staff Report KOHL RV&BOAT STORAGE BUILDING LUA-02-079, CU-A,SA-A, ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF AUGUST 6,2002 Page 5 of 14 C. Consistency with Conditional Use Permit Criteria In reviewing the proposal with respect to the Conditional Use Criteria set forth in Section 4-9-030, the following issues have been identified by City Departmental Reviewers and Divisional Reviewers: 1. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Code & other ordinances The proposed use shall be compatible with the general purpose, goals, objectives and standard of the Comprehensive Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and any other plan, program, map or ordinance of the City of Renton. a. Comprehensive Plan, Its Elements and Policies The subject site is designated Employment Area — Valley (EAV) on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. The EAV designation is intended to provide for a mix of employment-based uses, including commercial, office and industrial development to support the economic growth of the City. The proposed RV & boat storage facility, is consistent with the following EAV policies: • Policy LU-212.1: Develop the Renton Valley and the Black River Valley areas as a place for a range and variety of commercial, office, and industrial uses. • Policy LU 212.8: Recognize viable existing and new industrial uses in the Valley, while promoting the gradual transition of uses on sites with good access and visibility to more intensive commercial and office uses. b. Zoning Code The site is also located within the Commercial Arterial (CA) zoning designation. The purpose of the CA zone is to provide suitable environments for "strip" commercial development. The CA zone provides for a wide variety of retail sales and personal/professional services primarily oriented to automobile traffic along designated major arterial streets. Vehicular storage facilities are permitted in the CA zone, subject to the approval of an Administrative Conditional Use Permit. In general, the proposal appears to be consistent with the range of uses permitted in the CA zoning designation. c. Development Standards Lot Coverage —The CA zone allows a maximum building coverage of 65% of the site area. In this case the site is approximately 179,903 square feet and the applicant is proposing to construct approximately 60,085 square feet of building, plus the existing 1,600 square foot of office space, which equates to a building lot coverage of approximately 34% (60,085 + 1,600 = 61,685 sf / 179,903 = 34%). With the addition of the proposed storage buildings, the site would remain within code requirements for lot coverage. Setbacks—The minimum front yard setback required in the CA zone is 10 feet, which can be reduced down to zero through the site plan review process. There is no maximum front yard setback within this zone. The applicant has proposed to locate Building A approximately 10 feet from the front property line (abutting East Valley Road), which is in compliance with the above-mentioned regulations. In addition, the applicant is required to provide a 10-foot wide rear yard setback, as the subject site is abutting State Route 167. There are no side yard setbacks required in the CA zone, provided that the subject site is not adjacent to a residential zone or a street. In this case, the subject site's side yards are not adjacent to a residential zone or a street. The proposal has been designed to comply with all applicable setback requirements. sit,cup&erc.doc 6 • City of Renton P/B/PW DepartmentAdminis a Conditional Use,Administrative Site Plan A, , val& Environmental Review Committee Staff Report KOHL RV&BOAT STORAGE BUILDING LUA-02-079,CU-A,SA-A, ECF _ REPORT AND DECISION OF AUGUST 6,2002 Page 6 of 14 Landscaping — The CA development standards require a 10-foot wide landscaping strip to be located within the front yard setback (abutting East Valley Road) and within the rear yard setback (abutting State Route 167). The applicant has elected to provide a 10-foot wide landscaping setback within the front and rear yard setback areas, as required by code. In addition, the applicant has proposed to provide an additional 10-foot landscaping setback abutting the subject site's northern property boundary and a 5-foot landscaping setback abutting the site's southern property boundary. The north and south landscaping setbacks has been designed to provide an additional screen to the neighboring properties, although not required by code. Building Height — The maximum building height permitted in the CA zone is 50 feet. The proposed RV & boat storage facility would have a maximum building height of approximately 17 feet, which is less than the maximum permitted within the CA zone. Parking — Based on the City's parking regulations, the existing office building would require a minimum of 3 to a maximum of 4.5 parking stalls for every 1,000 square feet of gross floor area. For the 1,600 square foot office, the amount of parking required would range from 6 to 8 stalls. In addition, the parking regulations require 1 parking stall for each 3,500 square feet of warehouse or storage space. In this case, the applicant is proposing 60,085 square feet of building storage space and approximately 20,861 square feet of outdoor storage space, which require 23 parking stalls. Combining both the office area and the storage area, a total of 29 to 31 parking stalls would be required by code. The applicant is proposing a total of 29 paved and striped customer/employee- parking stalls. All of the proposed parking stalls have been designed to be standard (9'X20') right angel parking stalls, with the exception of one ADA accessible stall located near the existing office building entrance and two parallel parking stalls located behind the existing office building. It should be noted that the two proposed parallel parking stalls are dimensioned at 20 feet in length and code requires a parallel parking stall of 23 feet in length. However, as there is sufficient room to provide the additional length, staff will require the applicant to enlarge the parallel parking stalls per code requirements prior to building permit approval. Finally, in order to ensure that visitor and staff parking stalls are not leased out to RV or boat storage customers, staff recommends a condition of project approval requiring the applicant to provide on-site parking signage, which identifies the guest/employee stalls and indicates that they are not for lease. Staff recommends that this condition be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of final occupancy permits. 2. Community Need There shall be a community need for the proposed use at the proposed location. In the determination of community need, the Administrator shall consider the following factors, among all other relevant information: a. The proposed location shall not result in either the detrimental over concentration of a particular use within the City or within the immediate area of the proposed use. The applicant has indicated that the City is in need of additional RV & boat storage R space, as there are not enough storage facilities within the immediate area to fulfil the demand generated for this type of use. In addition, staff is not aware of any other facilities of this type, which are solely dedicated to RV & boat storage within the immediate vicinity of the subject property. sit,cup&erc.doc • City of Renton P/B/PW DepartmentAdminist ?Conditional Use,Administrative Site Plan Ai 'al& Environmental Review Committee Staff Report KOHL RV&BOAT STORAGE BUILDING LUA-02-079, CU-A,SA-A, ECF _ REPORT AND DECISION OF AUGUST 6,2002 Page 7 of 14 b. That the proposed location is suited for the proposed use. The proposed location appears to be suitable for the proposed use in that it is appropriately located in the CA zoning designation. The site has been utilized previously as a contractor's storage yard, which would be discontinued to allow for the development of the storage facility. The proposed use, as a RV & boat storage facility, would not require significant alterations to the existing site and would be compatible with neighboring uses. 3. Effect on Adjacent Properties The proposed use at the proposed location shall not result in substantial or undue adverse affects on adjacent property. The following site requirements shall be required: a. Lot Coverage — Lot coverage shall conform to the requirements of the zone in which the proposed use is to be located. The CA zone limits building lot coverage to 65%. The applicant is proposing to construct approximately 60,085 square feet of storage buildings and utilize an existing 1,600 square foot office, which equate to a building lot coverage of approximately 34%. As previously noted, the proposed building lot coverage is less than the maximum allowed within this zoning designation. b. Yards — Yards shall conform to the requirements of the zone in which the proposed use is to be located. Additions to the structure shall not be allowed in any required yard. The CA zone requires a minimum landscaped front yard setback of 10 feet and a minimum rear yard landscaped setback of 10 feet (as the site is abutting State Route 167). The applicant has proposed to provide a 10-foot wide landscape setback in the front (abutting East Valley Road), rear (abutting State Route 167) and northern side property line. c. Height— Building and structure heights shall conform to the requirements of the ' zone in which the proposed use is to be located. Building heights should be related to surrounding uses in order to allow optimal sunlight and ventilation, and minimal obstruction of views from adjacent structures. The CA limits building height to 50 feet above finished grade. The applicant is proposing seven storage buildings that are not proposed to exceed a maximum building height of approximately 17 feet and would be limited to one story in height, which is substantially below the maximum height permitted in this zone. 4. Compatibility The subject property is located within a predominantly industrial area and is surrounded by other commercial/industrial structures. Specifically, the site is bounded by East Valley Road to the west, State Route 167 to the east, a bingo hall to the north and an auto wrecking yard to the south. Furthermore, the subject site has been used for a contractor's storage yard for '� the past several years. Therefore, staff does not anticipate the conversion of the property from a contractor's storage yard to a RV & boat storage facility would pose a negative impact i to the surrounding area. 5. Parking It Please refer to discussion under the Consistency with the Conditional Use Permit Criteria item number two as it relates to the subject site's land use zoning designation and applicable ,, sit,cup&erc.doc City of Renton P/B/PW DepartmentAdminisi s Conditional Use,Administrative Site Plan Ai ,. ._ial& Environmental Review Committee Staff Report KOHL RV&BOAT STORAGE BUILDING LUA-02-079, CU-A,SA-A,ECF d� REPORT AND DECISION OF AUGUST 6,2002 Page 8 of 14 development regulations (i.e. setbacks, lot coverage, building height, parking, etc.) pertaining to the proposed development. 6. Traffic According to the Traffic Impact Analysis submitted with the application, prepared by Christopher Brown & Associates, dated June 25, 2002, the proposal is consistent with current City transportation policy and planned in a matter that is safe and efficient with existing traffic patterns in the area. The report indicates that the proposal, once completed, would likely generate less trips that the existing construction storage yard operation. Therefore, the applicant concludes that a traffic impact fee is not required. However, staff has determined that the contractor's storage yard was never an approved use at the site; therefore, the applicant is subject to the traffic impact fees associated with the proposed development. The report indicates that the proposal would result in 19 traffic trips generated by this proposal onto the City's street system. Therefore, staff recommended as part of the environmental review of this proposal that the applicant be required to pay a traffic mitigation fee. The Environmental Review Committee is requiring the applicant to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee based at a rate of $75.00 per net new average daily trip associated with the project. The fee for this proposal is estimated at $1,425 (19 daily trips x $75.00 = $1,425.00) and is payable prior to the issuance of building or construction permits. 7. Noise, Glare The applicant has proposed to locate several metal storage buildings near the perimeter of the subject property. In order to offset any noise or glare impacts associated with the proposed development, the applicant has elected to provide a 10-foot wide perimeter landscaping strip adjacent to the north, east and west property boundaries. The landscaping strip has been designed to accommodate trees, shrubs and flowers, which would help minimize the scale of the proposed structures. It should also be noted that the proposed structures are limited to one story and would be approximately 17 feet in height, which would also minimize any impacts to neighboring properties. Noise levels are not anticipated to increase above existing conditions. 8. Landscaping The development regulations require the applicant to provide a 10-foot wide landscaping setback adjacent to the subject site's western (East Valley Road) and eastern (SR 167) boundaries. In addition, the City's development regulations require all development within the Employment Area —Valley to provide an additional 2% of landscaping throughout the project site. The applicant has proposed to provide several Austrian Pine trees, Portuguese Laurel shrubs and lawn within the 10-foot wide landscaping strip adjacent to East Valley Road. In addition, the applicant is proposing to provide a 10-foot wide landscaping strip containing Oregon Grape along the subject site's northern property boundary and a 5-foot wide landscaping strip also containing Oregon Grape along the site's southern property boundary. Lastly, the applicant is proposing to provide 10 Western Red Cedar Trees (planted 30-foot on center) along with several Redtwig Dogwood trees within the 10-foot wide landscape setback adjacent to State Route 167. However, staff does not believe that the 30-foot on center spacing of the Western Red Cedar trees would provide an adequate screen from State Route 167. Therefore, in order to limit the appearance of a large warehouse structure from State Route 167, staff recommends a condition of project approval requiring the applicant to provide three additional Western Red Cedar Trees to be planted near the subject site's northeastern property corner. Staff recommends that this condition be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of building permits. sit,cup&erc.doc ' City of Renton P/B/PW DepartmentAdminis.✓e Conditional Use,Administrative Site Plan I. _ Ival& Environmental Review Committee Staff Report KOHL RV&BOAT STORAGE BUILDING LUA-02-079, CU-A,SA-A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF AUGUST 6,2002 Page 9 of 14 d 9. Accessory Uses E i No accessory uses are proposed. In fact, the property is currently being utilized as a contractor's storage yard. However, upon project approval the subject site would be I converted to a RV & boat storage facility, which would be rented to the general public. The 4 proposed RV & boat storage facility is considered a permitted use in the CA zone, subject to the approval of an Administrative Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Review. o 10. Conversion As noted above, the subject site is currently being utilized as a contractor's storage yard, which was never an approved use at this location. The applicant is now requesting an Administrative Conditional Use Permit to convert the use to a RV & boat storage facility. ' Upon project approval, all activity associated with the contractor's office would be discontinued. 11. Public Improvements No additional public improvements will be required for this proposal. Specifically, the City's utility departments have indicated that there are sufficient facilities within East Valley Road to serve the proposed use. D. Consistency with Site Plan Criteria In reviewing the proposal with respect to the Site Plan Approval Criteria set forth in Section 4-9-200 of the Site Plan Ordinance, the following issues have been identified by City Departmental Reviewers and Divisional Reviewers: 1. Conformance with the comprehensive plan, its elements and policies; Please refer to discussion under the Consistency with the Conditional Use Permit Criteria item number one as it relates to the subject site's Comprehensive Land Use Designation and applicable policies pertaining to the proposed development. , i 2. Conformance with existing land use regulations; Please also refer to discussion under the Consistency with the Conditional Use Permit Criteria item number two as it relates to the subject site's land use zoning designation and applicable development regulations (i.e. setbacks, lot coverage, building height, parking, etc.) pertaining to the I proposed development. 3. Mitigation of impacts to surrounding properties and uses; The subject site is currently being utilized as a contractor's storage yard; however, upon project completion the subject site would be converted to a RV & boat storage facility. It should be noted that the subject site is located in an industrial/commercial area of the City, which allows other intensive uses (warehousing, truck terminals, etc.). Nevertheless, the applicant has proposed to buffer the RV & boat storage use from neighboring uses by providing a 10-foot wide landscaping setback adjacent to the subject site's western, northern and eastern property boundary. In addition, the applicant has proposed to limit the storage buildings to one story and approximately . 17 feet in height. The proposed use, as a RV & boats storage facility, would require a secure area in order to protect customers recreational vehicles stored within the site. Therefore, the applicant has proposed to provide a 7-foot high fence along the entire perimeter of the subject site. The fence adjacent to East Valley Road would consist of a solid split face cement block wall, while the front (entrance) gate would be constructed of wrought iron fence pickets. A metal fence/wall would be •1 located adjacent to the remaining north, south and east property boundaries. The fence has been .1 designed to act as a final security measure as well as to screen the proposed use from neighboring , properties. i sit,cup&erc.doc City of Renton P/B/PW DepartmentAdminis......ve Conditional Use,Administrative Site Plan I wal& Environmental Review , Committee Staff Report KOHL RV&BOAT STORAGE BUILDING LUA-02-079, CU-A,SA-A, ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF AUGUST 6,2002 Page 10 of 14 4. Mitigation of impacts of the proposed site plan to the site; G 11 The proposal is not expected to adversely impact the site. There are no significant natural features, which would be impacted by the development. Construction activities would be required to utilize best management practices that would reduce potential construction impacts to the site. As stated in the applicant's construction mitigation plan, erosion control measures would be implemented as ?, part of the project. 5. Conservation of area-wide property values; The proposal would allow for the development of a new RV & boat storage facility that would potentially provide a needed service to area residents and businesses. As the subject site is e currently being utilized as a contractor's storage yard, staff expects this project to conserve or potentially enhance area-wide property values in the vicinity. 6. Safety and efficiency of vehicle and pedestrian circulation; The applicant has proposed to limit the number of driveways serving the site off of East Valley Road. Specifically, the site has been designed to provide one 30-foot wide driveway, which would serve customers and staff entering and exiting the site. This drive is proposed to be located in the southwest corner of the site, directly north of the existing 1,600 square foot office building. The applicant has proposed to shift an existing driveway located in the northwest corner of the property I approximately 25 feet to the south, which would be uses exclusively for emergency access. This drive has been designed to be approximately 20 feet in width and would be interrupted by a 20-foot wide gate just beyond the proposed driveway. The gate has been designed to be easily accessible by the City's emergency response units. The applicant has also attempted to design the traffic flow and parking stall locations in such a manner that would minimize any potential dangerous situations with storage customers attempting to simultaneously park their vehicles. This has been accomplished by providing wider storage stalls (12 feet in width) and by providing a minimum of 30-foot wide driving isles between structures and parking stalls. This, in turn, provides future customers with adequate maneuvering area when attempting to park or pull out their recreational vehicles. In addition, customer/guest parking is proposed to be located near the existing office building entrance and adjacent to the western I landscaping strip, which is situated away from the proposed storage buildings. 7. Provision of adequate light and air; Staff does not anticipate the blockage of adequate light and/or air to the subject site or to the I° surrounding properties. In fact, the building layout has been designed to provide adequate vehicular { maneuverability by providing large open spaces between structures, which also promotes air and light circulation. In additon, the applicant has proposed to limit the buildings to one story and F� approximately 17 feet in height. As the buildings are proposed to be limited in height, staff does not expect the structures to cast significant shadows or block normal air flow on neighboring properties. 8. Mitigation of noise, odors and other harmful or unhealthy conditions; The proposal is not expected to create any harmful or unhealthy conditions. Moreover, the subject site is currently being utilized as a contractor's storage yard and is located in an area of the City that allows many other intensive industrial and commercial uses. Therefore, staff does not expect the proposed RV & boat storage use to create additional noise and odor impacts above existing conditions within this area of the City. Noise, dust and odor, which may result from the temporary '1 construction of the site, would be mitigated by the applicant's construction mitigation plan. 9. Availability of public services and facilities to accommodate the proposed use; and The subject site is adequately served by public services and facilities. The proposal would not require the extension of services or further improvements. sit,cup&erc.doc " City of Renton P/B/PW DepartmentAdminisirauve Conditional Use,Administrative Site Plan/., _oval& Environmental Review Committee Staff Report KOHL RV& BOAT STORAGE BUILDING LUA-02-079, CU-A,SA-A, ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF AUGUST 6,2002 Page 11 of 14 10. Prevention of neighborhood deterioration and blight. As noted above, the subject site is currently utilized as a contractor's storage yard; therefore staff considers the conversion of the site to a structured RV & boat storage facility to be a benefit to the community and the existing neighborhood. Therefore, no deterioration or blight is expected to occur as a result of this proposal. XX Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. D. Findings, Conclusions & Decision Having reviewed the written record in the matter, the City now enters the following: 1) Request: The Applicant has requested Environmental (SEPA) Review, Administrative Conditional Use Permit Approval and Administrative Site Plan Approval for the Kohl RV & Boat Storage facility Project No. LUA-02-079, CU-A, SA-A & ECF. 2) Environmental Review: The applicant's file containing the application, State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation, the comments from various City departments, the public notices requesting citizen comment, and other pertinent documents was entered as Exhibit No. 1. 3) Conditional Use Permit Review: The applicant's Conditional Use Permit application complies with the requirements for information for Conditional Use Permit review, provided all , advisory notes and conditions of approval are complied with. The applicant's site plan and other project drawings are entered as Exhibits No. 2 through 6. 4) Site Plan Review: The applicant's site plan application complies with the requirements for information for site plan review, provided all advisory notes and conditions of approval are complied with. The applicant's site plan and other project drawings are entered as Exhibits No. 2 through 6. 5) Comprehensive Plan: The subject proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Employment Area —Valley (EAV). 6) Zoning: The Site Plan as presented, complies with the zoning requirements and development standards of the Commercial Arterial (CA) Zoning designation. 7) Existing Land Use: Land uses surrounding the subject site include: North: commercial property, zoned Commercial Arterial (CA); East: State Route 167, existing state right-of-way; South: commercial property, zoned Commercial Arterial (CA); West: East Valley Road, existing right-of-way. E. Conclusions 1) The subject proposal complies with the policies and codes of the City of Renton, provided all advisory notes and conditions of approval are complied with. 2) The proposal complies with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Employment Area — Valley (EAV); and the Zoning designation of Commercial Arterial (CA). F. Decision The Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Review for the Kohl RV & Boat Storage Facility, File No. LUA-02-079, CU-A, SA-A, ECF, is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall provide on-site parking signage, which identifies the guest/employee stalls and indicates that they are not for lease. This condition shall be subject to the sit,cup&erc.doc City of Renton P/B/PW DepartmentAdminis.......e Conditional Use,Administrative Site Plan A val& Environmental Review Committee Staff Report KOHL RV&BOAT STORAGE BUILDING LUA-02-079, CU-A,SA-A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF AUGUST 6,2002 Page 12 of 14 review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of final occupancy permits. 2. The applicant shall provide three additional Western Red Cedar Trees to be planted near the subject site's northeastern property corner. This condition shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of building permits. EFFECTIVE DATE OF DECISION ON LAND USE ACTION: SIGNATURES: A je(i ttia gl 2c02 Neil Watts, Development Services Director Date TRANSMITTED this 12th day of August,2002 to the owner and contact: DC Properties (owner) 3350 East Valley Road Renton,WA 98055 James Jaeger(contact) Jaeger Engineeing 9419 S 204th Place Kent,WA 98031 TRANSMITTED this 12th day of August,2002 to the following: Jennifer Henning,Development/Planning Larry Meckling,Building Official Larry Rude,Fire Prevention Kayren Kittrick,Public Works Division Lawrence J.Warren,City Attorney South County Journal Environmental Determination and Land Use Decision Appeal Process Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM August 26, 2002. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the ' required$75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Planning 1. The subject site is located within the Employment Area-Valley(EAV)Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation and within the Commercial Arterial (CA) zoning designation. 2. Vehicular storage facilities are permitted in the Commercial Arterial (CA) zone subject to an Administrative Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Review approval. 3. Within thirty(30) days of completion of grading work, the applicant shall hydroseed or plant an appropriate ground cover over any portion of the site that is graded or cleared of vegetation and where no further construction work will occur within ninety(90) days. Alternative measures such as mulch, sodding, or plastic covering as specified in the current King County Surface Water Management Design Manual as adopted by the City of Renton may be proposed between the dates of November 1st and March 31st of each year. The :i Development Services Division's approval of this work is required prior to final inspection and approval of the permit. 4. All landscaping shall be irrigated by an approved irrigation system prior to final occupancy permits. sit,cup&erc.doc City of Renton P/B/PW DepartmentAdminisL1auve Conditional Use,Administrative Site Plan oval& Environmental Review Committee Staff Report KOHL RV&BOAT STORAGE BUILDING LUA-02-079, CU-A,SA-A, ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF AUGUST 6,2002 Page 13 of 14 Fire Prevention 1. The preliminary fire flow is 3,500 gpm, one hydrant is required within 150 feet of the structure and three additional hydrants are required within 300 feet of the structures. Proposed 10-inch loop appears adequate with the addition of one hydrant and the relocation of one of the proposed hydrants required. 2. . Building E only is required to have an approved, monitored fire sprinkler system. Separate plans and permits are required for the installation of fire sprinkler and monitoring systems. All other buildings as proposed do not require fire sprinkler systems. 3. Fire Department access roadways are required to within 150 feet of all portions of the building exterior. Roadways are a minimum 20-feet in width with a turning radius of 45-foot outside and 25-foot inside. Secondary access road required. All roads required to be marked as fire lanes. Roadway proposed appears adequate. 4. Fire department dead-end access roadways over 150 feet in length are required to have an approved turnaround. 5. Provide a list of the flammable, combustible liquids and any hazardous chemical to be used or stored on site. Building 1. Building, Electrical, plumbing and Mechanical permits will be required. 2. Compliance with all 1997 Uniform Codes and 1999 NEC is required. 3. An oil/water separator is required. Plan Review—WATER 1. This project site is located in the 196 Water Pressure Zone. The static water pressure at the street level is about 79 psi. 2. There is an existing 12" watermain located in East Valley Rd (see City of Renton water drawing W-2220 for additional information). 3. Construction of a commercial building will trigger a separate review. Per the City of Renton Fire Marshall the preliminary fire flow is 3500 GPM. Additional plan review will be required at the time of building permit review. Additional watermain improvements including fire hydrants, a Fire Sprinkler system, and a DDCVA will be required to meet the fire flow demand as determined by the Fire Marshall. 4. The conceptual utility plan showing the 10" watermain loop needs to be modified to include one additional fire hydrant and to include relocating the fire hydrant on the east side to the north side mid parcel. There will be detailed plan review at the time of building permit submittal. 5. The project is not located in the Aquifer Protection Zone. 6. Water System Development Charges of$0.154 per square foot gross area may be required if not previously paid. The Development Charges are collected as part of the construction permit. Please note that any parcel that currently has water and or sewer service may be eligible for a prorated system development charge. Your project will be reviewed to determine how much redevelopment credit applies. Plan Review- SANITARY SEWER 1. There is an existing 10"sanitary sewer main located in East Valley Road. 2. Applicant needs to submit a sanitary sewer plan showing how they will apply sewer service to the building. 3. Permanent structures are not allowed over City utilities. 4. If the structures are treated as buildings and are required to have floor drains, then the floor drains are required to be connected to sanitary sewer subject to the installation of a grease interceptor or oil/water separator as determined at the time of plan review. 5. System Development Charges (SDC) are$0.106 per square foot. These fees are collected at the time a construction permit is issued. Please note that any parcel that currently has water and or sewer service may be eligible for a prorated system development charge. Your project will be reviewed to determine how much redevelopment credit applies. Plan Review- SURFACE WATER 1. There are storm drainage facilities in East Valley Road. 2. A conceptual drainage plan and report has been submitted and is under review at this time. 3. The Surface Water SDC fees are $0.183 (but not less than $525) per square foot of new impervious area. These fees are collected at the time a construction permit is issued. Plan Review—TRANSPORTATION 1. Construction of a commercial building would trigger a separate review. 2. The number and location of the driveways shown are acceptable to Transportation. The north driveway approach (' shall be reserved only for Emergency Vehicle Use. 3. Street lighting is required to be installed for this project on the public right-of-way. 1 4. All new electrical, phone and cable services to the site must be undergrounded. Construction of these franchise i! utilities must be inspected and approved by a City of Renton public works inspector prior to completion of the it building. sit,cup&erc.doc • City of Renton P/B/PW DepartmentAdministrauve Conditional Use,Administrative Site Plan f,r,.,oval& Environmental Review Committee Staff Report KOHL RV& BOAT STORAGE BUILDING LUA-02-079, CU-A,SA-A, ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF AUGUST 6,2002 Page 14 of 14 Plan Review—GENERAL 1. All required utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed Civil Engineer. 2. All plans shall be tied to a minimum of two of the City of Renton Horizontal and Vertical Control Network. 3. Permit application must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. The fee for review and inspection of these improvements is 5% of the first$100,000 of the estimated construction costs; 4% of anything over $100,000 but less than $200,000, and 3% of anything over$200,000. Half of the fee must be paid upon application for building and construction permits and the remainder when the permits are issued. There may be additional fees for water service related expenses. See Drafting Standards. Police 1. Please see attached police handouts. cu sit. P&erc.doc CORRUGATED O""`AD PETALR00f A PORTION OF THE SE 1 4, SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 23 N., RANGE 5 E., W.M. • PROPERTY SITE DATA: �.1 1 V % ETC CORRUGATED METAL NO. SPACES: 184 lu METAL POSTSIli i 1 j 113 COVERED RV SPACES (62.5X) y titer 69 OPEN BOAT SPACES (37.5%) II f 0 i 0 SITE AREA: 4.13 ACRES a O SPACE SIZE: 12' x 40' (RV's), 12'x 22' & 20' (BOATS) / (. ASPHALT SURFACE ENTIRE SITE SITE WILL BE LIGHTED USING ROOF MOUNTED FLOOD LIGHTS / o J TYP. COVERED SECTION LANDSCAPE m d SOLID CORRUGATED METAL WALL NCINITY MAP 20'WIDE GRAVEL EMERGENCY 0 ACCESS W/20'SWING GATE FIRE SPRINKLER SYS. 9 Z (NORMALLY LOCKED) SOLID METAL END WALL IMPERIALS BINGO SOLID REAR PANEL WITH t Q FIRE SPRINKLER 5Y5. 3'LOCKING DOOR RISER SHED(6'X4') SOLID' LOCKINGR DOOR PANEL WITH RISER SHED(6'X4'• ) ' ce I I g4gpg^-— — — -- -- .. =T m • / SOLID LIETA14 END WALL = — I ii, +eesa+w.va�SANWWA *Do0WNo,....NW .. ..10'WIDE LANDSCA mrr2aaa9zia-aenetemee.:mcav eaama<o-s¢ae.471+wr.ww•• — 9 MST.DRIVEWAt < �\ I TO BE REMOVED 7 ���ET ■ \\ 1 0 b $� I 1 WI S001 1ATE 17 COVERED BACK-IN SPACES O 12 40 A H 10 COVERED BACK-IN SPACES O 12'R 70I EACH ' ' \`\^ `: E Q Q STREET TREES.SHRUB- 1■ B I li S AND FLOWERING _ F PERENIALS ALL ALONG 1O `I W • R BACK-IN;SPACES O 12'x - m' '``, ,, I I I I N e6 FRONTAGE I i I ,, � I 1 SOLID CORRUGATED METAL WALL ;<: I ASPHALT " , "� •_►� _ W II 4N I ��,J PAVEMENT1111hWilln"����60 ,^�` O I EIDSITNc TREE SCREEN 1 w sp i I I oEXI a 3 u FH TO FREEWAY � te�a,,o. t _ Q I WN ASPHALT ••r •-I A. • x40 ACH ' I' ,,,,����qqqq It ASPHALT I co • !! I . a PAVEMENT PAVEMENT < • I I• 23 OPEN BACK-IN SPACES O 12'x 20'EACH z I�I I ! Ii Z WALL(a FACE//// ///4i ///,j///////// ,:w �/' Jm �s err I N C, J I.,I o IRON TER ASPHALT m x 11 jl �I'� < I F CE 0 ENTRAN B 'm - VEMENT F_____ I 1I y <I Itt O nl'o y i 22 OPEN PULL THROUGH SPACES•O 12'x 22'EACH = I z d F-- r „ ® .=4A S 4R• E \ I' /-'EXISTING FREEWAY (n I d".' 7; A R'ACC� `I. DRAINAGE DITCH W I AN SRI AFlr'V ® F J\ I I EO FREEWAY TREE SCREEN ,Lwr1H MEW, ) TO FREEWAY I w. WWWrnnl"r". ,� "� ASPHALT 22 OPEN BACK-IN SPACES O 12'x 22'EACH- alg/ o CONC.sOEwAu PAVEMENT _ NIn J 1 ' 9 !u EXIS1I. - _.-N SPA ES 0 12'x 46.5'EACH 10 COVERED BACK-IN SPACES q 12'�x 'S'EACH o I I a 3 ENV I I DRIB AY aRLE �I.L� n 1'T I I. (00 R MAIN) REi1uro ���_\ \ W �� ' EAL_ , IN I I r k I �,��� 8�R� A I (%1D REAR PANEL WIDTH I ,�__``` 1.'� rO�hUBLE 3'LOCKING DOORS m m I �I FIRE SPRINKLER SYS. FUTURE 5'WIDE 541.99 SOLID REAR PANEL WITH JI: sI -• •METAL END WALL RISER SHED(6'X4') LANDSCAPE STRIP ¢ 3'LOCKING DOOR \ I�/M�� �„>^+�°y` +' SOLID CORRUGATED METAL REAR WALL Sr7 Y tit S r 7 ,� SOLID REAR PANEL WITH lllfff C 3'LOCKING DOOR SOUTH END AUTO WRECKING FIRE SPRINKLER SYS. 7'HIGH SOLID SPOT FACE CEM NT BLOCK WROUGHT IRON RISER SHED(6'X4') GRAPHIC SC ' oE' — FENCE PICKETS I en..NMN I lil It1 I 4 1 I t Il I 11 I I ■■ ■■ oa,,,.MORD„T j I ? i !E I.I II I I I I I J � � I I . I 111111111111111111111111111111111.• ; ; KOHL EXCAVATING . IIDEPARTTME OF RENToN fr JJ30 EAST VALLEY ROAD MA-s n.RENTON, WA. 98055I■I�I■I 1 1 I SIlE PLAN ll1M�= f III PHONE: (425)251-8820 JAEGER ENGINEERING KOHL RV AND BOAT STORAGE 1 I I I I IUIUIUI I I I I ■■ ■■ W: I I 1 9119 Kent. W. 4th Place emo, ,w �,,,,� — �. �. .1, ��� �I� 11� Kent, WA. 98031 3.u/L5 w TYPICAL FRONTAGE FENCE ENTRANCE FENCE Phone No.(253)850-0934 u ""` "m Ra mw. w AAA AAR For No.(253)850-0155 wwown wm:Cl m:5 _.. ___. _. ___.. __. - :_ _ —_ ...-r: -... _ • • NOTES .4 '. �\ �i PLANT UST INSTALL 4•TOPSOIL IN ALL LAWN AND PLANT BEDS. aeo•,eue a INSTALL 3: BARK MULCH IN PLANT BEDS. + ' ..� PROVIDE ONE YEAR WRATI WARRANTY FOR All PLANTS AND LAWN. —�{/ •'TMa 8 UWIDAMBER STYRACIFLUA SMEETWM INSTALL AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION PER IRRIGATION PLAN. �'RRwnewpni U CAL R O.C. NO SUBSTITUTIONS. e•. .i` OBTAIN ANY AND ALL REQUIRED PERMITS AND INSPECTIONS. - 1.¢STAKE litr 2><NATURAL LANDSCAPE CALCULATION r una YAK tow. '^,LL'Tearm 3 PINUS NIGRA AUSTRIAN PINE LANDSCAPE AREA PROVIDED•21,360 S.F. 1� roam•�,.,., �- ruWA eAw, �• n.c, 6'-7'HT. 30'O.C. ICE TOTAL2%OF TOTAL REWIRED-427 S.F. ..1 -!v 410 EDa* TOTAL NATURAL LANDSCAPE PROVIDED•18,041 S.F. In ' `. m e •AAA. •'•'w 10 THUJA PLICATE WESTERN REDCEDAR >.mnru ��� rog R /��� 'a i 6'-T HT. 30'O.C. TREE STAG DETAIL SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL CONIFEROUS TREE STAKING ED 149 AMMONIA AWIFODUM OREGONGRAPE 2 GAL. 6'O.C. 20'WIDE GRAVEL EMERGENCY ACCESS W/20'SWING GATE IMPERIALS BINGO ® 56 CORNUS STOLONIFERA REDTNIG DOGWOOD (NORMALLY LOCKED) 2 GAL. 6'O.C. A I - i+ • I 0 50 PRUNUS LUSITANICA PORTUGESE LAUREL I , ,i .` x. I �J LAWN JB SOD OREGON GROWN I I� • s TMBIOSWALE AND NATURAL AREA HYDROSEED T. .rAL •�I, Altos . DC A LIlk EA• (R•, SL:-E I ••M-EAL,-00? ' OP"A �( DESCHAMR AR S { ''� I CAESPITOSA 1 �. ,�(���- - - \• _ TO E B CK0 GLYCERIA OCgDENTALIS 2% ,25�1TE BECKMANNIA SYDGACHNE 176 1. -D RATE• T. T1A S.F. I I \.1 • • 10-20-20 FEAT.AT A RATE OF 8 L3./1,000 S.F. EXISTING FREEWAY WOOD FIBER MULCH AT A RATE OF 2,000 LB./ACRE emi lk 101 t' i �,:� DRAINAGE DITCH INCLUDE•J•TACK IN MULCH. T I tF,,, I link ASPHALT \ a o'/� PAVEMENT , ik' I (•! EN DE M L _ CRASS-LINED BIOFS.TRATION • •11 (R F OP TO OR \ _ SWALE. 100'LONG,12'N1DE _go! ) ♦I/ 4 �.�r OEBAIL SHT.S 3)LF SLOPE:0.3f:(SEE • �I • ASPHALT I I _ ,!`j1\ PAVEMENT • J I I '(, . �� ` 1.Xl b50LUD BLOa ///////////////// '^ N Q *`;"4.IF o ASPHALTT FA A �I l► PAVEMENT -._T,-1' EXIST.DRIVEWAY I, 1 CURB DROP TO REMAIN 'I I I wAi 30'WIDE "half" II DRIVEWAY -ly (WITH MECH.GA / • {.•CONG.'Si0EWALK • . pp-. ,,. 1 i} EXIS(f. I 1 •kl•� E�5I�� `DRIB AV I arsltE I • I=I >fl I (.0 R MAIN)I Ik'l .- W +__ ___7 D� _ ___ _ .•' I j! ..� L ME �3NN` -E FRe I bI I ,�I�ry; J��w Ilk \����S • ` TAL ROC1 110 J ,-,w1r I 541.99 .•�'� /� I ` /J{: I `F RI • \ ' // \DRAINAGEEXISTING FDI CHAP { Jo SOUTH END AUTO WRECKING Z s L....0*.hc Me Nue LANDSCAPE PLAN , KOHL EXCAVATING •.. 5-21-02 Rube KOHL RV AND BOAT STORAGE 3330 VALLEY ROAD 1a"• ' • 3L EAGLE DESIGN IN.•r O.B.L. L - RENTOW,(425) 98055 �� ' PHONE 251-8820 Br 28007 NE 27LA DR. REDMOND,R'ARI@TOTON 06069 2 Revise* TEL. (425)B98-8633 FAX (420 e•e-21e4 • • A PORTION OF THE SE 1/4, SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 23 N., RANGE 5 E., W,M. • U N 10'x6'TEE(FL) 10'x4'TEE(FL) ( B 1I (2)10'ADAPTER(FLxMJ) 6'G.V.(FL,MJ) 10'z4'TEE(MJ0FL) W 4'C.V.(FLAW) 4'G.V.(FLoMJ) O 9 LF 6'D.I. IMPERIALS BINGO Z 20'WIDE GRAVEL EMERGENCY CONC.BLOCKING Q ACCESS w/20'SWING GATE HYDRANT ASSY. FIRE SPRINKLER SYS. C) (NORMALLY LOCKED) (2)CONC.BLOCKING D. • C.B./5(TYPE 1) RISER SHED(6'%4') FIRE .•RINKLER SYS. RIM: 20.0 10-90'BEND(MJ) • Kn (7 I I RISE' SHED(6'X4') _ IE: 18.5 • M, 2 r 1 • CONC.BLOCKING 0 Q I I -- -- 548.08' - / • 03 0- 1 t I t _ - -A j EXISTING FREEWAY • CD ` I1L ,V ,�e�A�14► � � r. ••EAL gar _ `,1 •E1I \\ 1,..........„—.EXISTING Z TO O Q EXIST.CURB DROP iiiik. �II I Q EMERE ACCESS FOR D; Z I ,�� 2a GCE "—IS'MAW WATER EASEMENT(110) 4'WAlER ilm I I \` SWING 0'M a¢ J E♦ AR to DJ. V I ro F�st[o ( ROW LINE: 2 rt CUT IN EX.12"C.I. - I I E: 414.7 YQ 12'x10"TEE(MJxFL) I I I ia.ta MK 10•°'I' I E.,yI i t I I I 10'x6'TEE(F7) t 10'C.V.(iLxMJ) I I I .IF to•D.I. •, �•• gist •w -- (2)I0"x4"TEE MJ) 2-12'COUPLERS I I I I" 6'G.V.(FLxMJ) 2-12'D.I.SPOOLSTIIV a • CONC.BLOCKING ' I $' ASPHALT �____� lkIX , '1 ,( - • II (2)4'G.V.(FL%MJ) 0 hy 11 I I PAVEMENT �Alkl\ 11:111X Mfg'. I I t i 14 LF 6'D.I. 1 0 E I FIRE SPRINKLER SYS HYDRANT ASSY. hH I ;I; - RISER SHED 6'%4' 1 ; I (3)CONC.BLOCKING W r Q I 1I GRASSUNED BIOFlIiRAl10N M n $ C.B. (TYPE 1J C.B. TYPE 1 Iill KD O TOEL 56O SWAIEGSLOPE: .31{(SEE L� OI RIM 20.0 �� •'PP ASPHALT /6( )__ I 1 U Ar I I _ PAVEMENT "!, RIM: 19.5 I I00. I I� ) W b E¢ I' 18.04 IE: 16.78 •<a 1 I OETAIL SHT.C3 1. 6~L WI tuna /// // sy A I 1 ,. e- 5' 101 ECOLOGY19.0' LOCK WALL. 13 3 J 'I' ! WALL•.SOT FA. //////////j/// 6 // '- I . - BOTTOM EL: 414.50' ' _ 12'OUTLET: • I I 'J7_iw' IE: u.o' < I ( ) g S" AR 6' ASPHALT g,f' I I __ \ C.B. 1wE 2-54' rcI ,`I 10'x4'TE: MJAFL a I I I ` e G.V.(FL MJ) a PAVEMENT I I w/FLOW RESTRICTO)R 1I i I C. .BLO I ti 1 I \\ I' RIM:19.5' },N,, EXIST.DRIVEWAY I I �^ - , / I I - H • IE: 15.0' 5 OVERFLOW. 17.5' , 1 CURB DROP TO 'I, - I -'� SEE GET,SHT C3 REMAIN ��'30'WIDE - :r �• it . ICI I 1�©ial DRIVEWAY _ _I 1 I (YATH1dECf}� )n 14 TOP 5'IEYBLOCK WALL•:/ I BOTTOM EL: 14.75' J}, 1Yz10'TEE(MJxFL) IOgin I • •� =• - • J III DRAINAGE DETENTION POND - 2••1 .•caclaocw _ 10'C.V.(FLx1AJ) >; E%I51f. I °�,T� ' :ea t20'LONG x 12'WTDE INSIDE 2-12'CWPLERS aI I • (INSIDE) 1 2-12'D.I.SPOOLS /6 DRIB AY I ALA:.To 1 ' I BOTTOM EL: 15.0 CONC.BLOCKING NI I (.0 R MAIN)I ...1' 1 o �\ Y •'-EN R• 'A A �___ d /- a`•••_ III' MAX.W.L: 18.5 Isc:21.11 I�" $PVC BL'G. ME L CK • SLi � •` FR. Tilat, I TOP: 19.5 cI LANoscraxc • �•.e t- �.,. • tt �'M TAL r ��'�-� I 12'POND INLET • ' e '. IE: 15.0 AtI t 99 —" n �- -•"""--'-=-=1 —— 14 EXISTING FREEWAY FIRE SPRINKLER SYS. C.B.#3(TYPE 1) 10'x6'TEE(MJzFL) T�, /J�f—DRAINAGE DITCH 1 till I 1y1 RISER SHED(6'X4') RIM: 20.0 24 LF 6(ELJUJ) RIM:/2.(TYPE ). 1// I 1r G' IE: 17.43 CC" SOLID REAR PANEL WITH HYDRANT ASSY. IE: 16.12 3'LOCKING DOOR CONC.BLOCKING I1 • To PK stm \ Ill t 10'x4'TEE(MJxFL) • SOUTH END AUTO WRECKING 4"G.V.(FLAW) FIRE SPRINKLER SYS. m 10'D.I.SPOOL RISER SHED(6'X4') CONC.BLOCKING 44s SITE DATA: GRAPHICSCALE NO. SPACES: 180 A 113 COVERED RV SPACES (62.8%) KOHL EXCAVATING ,,O1t CITY OF RENT ON OF PUBLIC WORKS 6/ OPEN GOAD SPACES (37,2%) J330 RENTON,T WA.LL EY 98055ROC Wa.z n DRAINAGE AND PAVING PLAN SITE AREA: 4.13 ACRES . PHONE: (425)251-8820 JAEGER ENGINEERING KOHL RV AND BOAT STORAGE SPACE SIZE: 12' x 40' (RV's). 12'x 22' & 20' (BOATS) 9419 South 2046,Place ommew JJJ A. 98031 JJJ/Ls mot ''° ' wwoc _ SITE WILL BE LIGHTED USING ROOF MOUNTED FLOOD LIGHTS Phan.Na(253)850-0914 mxm JJJ g w. Romol •r NM We Fox No.(253)850-0155 ,rnMwa =.tc t- wa..C2.,5 • __ , _ . . _ . _. _ .._. . . _. _ _. . . . __ _ . ,____., .. ___ __._ . .. EY h;6:t 4tir.II • 'I I v l'l _ --I PENSIONS: • r I N REVISIONS: lel Q :'Q+: rg�121 r E W <.-f • IPJ m W. tee, - i Tilt • Q �j > aA ®III -� y I I'' ma O .. ee Os♦-77 ,efo 12 ii I I I 11 I P • J.N.L Je.u,L.Kook I 5 CA • !1 ,"„ 4 7 W J M i tllk 2S - I I Z • Inl ®uo A. O ; IKh J.M.Hawkins 1 2 ' SW c T W SITE d CC I I o / z-- �m1�-�- —fl woo, _ y , Orn I/"' / Ee091•at a Sem feenMer E.W.\ \ 7al A. y Q ,,,c,., ' (J 0 S.W. 29TH s ST.; 2'°�+i ti.. —-' s es 1.7e A,. c �` nea 7,'. x i� �, -„i+_._._.. - -rt 'e `� $ S stet ST. Nb N r3 W iw w z.. c Za.a F (Al B �c..ea �`�` - S I X III Inl iz I kk ` �a• - — = I• I I w/ _ t. �!6 VICINITY MAP I.. f.,•.OLI•f0 lal L�.� N T.S. f' "I I I- it I ill--14" ;P. Le vt-Tf I. - '� N.H.A. Hastings �_ Haann3. to �-k B 8 I I• / o I i iI, I ,eTr-7 u1 V CL [N AL t J I 0 I�I(BI 54 L 1 I swA.. u.' O 1 a ei p trc kk e - 'u,ID_-.'-.-• Ali 1 UI ® 0 V. NIA .' I.l 0 �7-.T..:.s-•.:r"- - Z Er _a. ICE,�� 3.. M A Pi1r 1 CC J w LP LOA-94.064 2]�•._ ur !'7. NAC //�r. M I d I III . Q I P-D`NY ..Db, .. " a _ JJ V W k W I e If I , i.l�- a: .._ii L. _-'I Nerma.dMlmorc I PM ®�S Q p !. II . I 1Ll I/�PE�,7sLT I 8 0 " ‘'�$ P. o fh i - wG03444I ;1 d" ` Fe Z O I I I ~ 114H� ,"„ T� �DOI.YL A. 8 l^.;. MS JJ 13"fin— is W CC Q D•nry a / L.e nr-n t 4 I II o 1h a \ �' \ \ \ � o m 1.-.- `� I�i = I.. .. Fele L Delores Kehl ✓` 6 a J 5 �" '"" I Progressive- Investment Ca I 11 �, ce j SITE. i. i plryl F ii a 11 = lD cc,^,��,�� t '1JIn-, st I • • F I �'^ END I.0l AL. .,a , • m I•I in y Y ps,-,70 WRELJ'aN6- ® """MMM Fah Z i• I 9., J.Y. Farrell R �� (J' 1 I I x ❑ _e Z QO ,rJ j�I DW1 - L, `' John V Farrell ✓ �. 1r o 0 i.M Ac. _ 'H anishi 34TH \ l I I` w—. ^® 1. a-a %K. ss__ Q W ro N CO 44 Ne„ I Erb NCH I © i ,....) 3 �j L eA . . • k N II I 6a,1•Ic ) 3.31 M. 1 1 ,f •1%0304 IL,JZ 1 N I 1, f V�AF� 6.s6 miGo®aroHi , ,•AF Y- Q O N 14,4 3 t, n J :1-/-) .t�, / I e IA( is W:;: O Ce • ..... /� IAI I� e/ J '4:. LIII? • T Yn'1 >„ I IC ...., na4Y'" - rL.__:r:.:....•e•_ Ji w W RAP CA _ 2.•_ _>u,t_•-_._. . ....� —'aP -„ , a� §L200 0 100 20o H Swop 800• V D 'i DATE: 7/6/01 r 2 r B U I I L I N G T O N 0) • / * i** 4144 (D1fe') _ w�' j K �� `A,. +S. 1 inch ••200 ft. SCALE: I. 200' a /, r�q••j� �.. DRsw.BY: JJJ 5 il, NOME SC (9 Howaro t V•V y If ENGINEER: APP.BY: _ N R THERN Hawkins ! r J A E G E R ENGINEERING JDBHe. J 9419 South 204th Place nrrT Kent, WA. 98031 Phone No. (253) 850-0934 OP 1 Fox No. (253) 850-0155 G3 - iy i 23N R5E W 1/2 , 1 L j I L C� SW 23rd St, i IHi IH �,�� IL �I 7th St C A SW 27th St.: SW 27th St. R / 1 Ill II II 1 li IM ' ll - II R C SW 29�th St 'i 1- i! i x x SOth St. I �!_ N N I / 1, �o g .-H I + 1-3 In 1 1 i I N I j l' _ 7i N l IH '1CA pd IL IL i II-I--- pi i I 0 S'el-E i; W 3 th St. 34th St S $'W 344th St!.i IL �, IL % IH `� 7 ycu E ricl IL IM SW'39th St. LI CA IL / , vl IM IM A.st St. SW 41st t, A! I3 • 31 T23N R5E W 1/2 GOY o 48 oa H 3 B ZONING ---- Renton tiny Lfmttp t® � ivtoP/B/PW TECHNICAL SERVICES 30 T23N R5E W 1/2 5330 Eyjvc‘ ZONING MAP BOOK .: .,..,.., lafirmi!ip.ofi diNEEig :-: ,455-(nriv:41,;-itip , .:„,: :.:::„„:,„:,:;:,:,:,„ , , w.ki_o • . it-V. 4_59 L.------. . , 1 ...._._ '--it...( ITIO o, r I meiiidalu*,.1., , _‘: IL...4 4 . •...4.1111- • . t, Wig iar:-:i.-::11 -, at i7- oii: :--2ma aziLi:- larliw.;,; R.':,. 28 T24N R5E mon • 0: ,, •:,:,::„.. •...„.,,:„..:... ._,44 3.:,:1,14119 / 1 • ,, ; . k 711/4 A 71 Irk . ^ • 1 464 j .,‘, k :-:.,]:,:. . . --- . ,• -.-----.- ::::-74. , iv Imilt 10.‘ ca : • „II , 1 tp, . ::,eie.r..,F.1., iiiAl VC - .=.',MI 46 a :.-_-______ (A . ._. trldifiRSEls.„- di. •1;100. -,401116ENIN'I' - _ 35 ,4N R5E ill-lakirlifI14-0111 :::::_::;taillkii;TifieraFrifille: eili *V. , k !1:-;. EmIllriliif i.--41 i `a -.-.,,E: :: -: %-\I1111"11 ' co int p)ip IIIIIIit-V,.:•41 -::-:ir,..-:i-::.:., ,,,:,,..• rz lika,.2. at, P.! Irbil v.r.!--„,_ :, ..:,:.,:i5, :,]-:,;, ,:,;,.,?:, , AN illiOP'iltAlrze' ;' 1111... . nittimokaPV X*4". ' ;M -rii-]:i]Allili11.11111V gr, 4{1; &k.All o.%).ml,,i.ai.'•4+2042245M5d:::K''''i:::::::':. MEILAILIPIMEraiRri.4 Sift, -11A—lk 'trope rtir•-z-Eira.;-,x,w e;, -47.,.._ Foriptwirr. ,1 -- -- -.In hr.ks 7 rill I ,, OP 111=t-itaziA II,4 •--''''' , ... , (411\V"" iir : Edmic•,0 41101 EI:, -,' i ji kilfil . 1...' titan , ''ll i MLR ii=muidgit, irimit.k.:A ‘ Xi ift!' -M1111111 kW'AA 1.1111147;z: .\ v ie___', 11_5411111:alr-ilaT, Fillir/ 11X01)1 1111&LINT:int ..1-1 i, . A LV---4.7.--r *...1 ijkaii .0 - ' • Li_. ) ..: .,.„,‘„.4.i .. .,, , if El II . leNrimi pe,01,0-911111111,macipis ,112.1,1111114 itillicitapj %inn . ut-ip lit .;,...f.•uwEii.mbal,,titt„.11-.: Irt.t.i.:a m,triA,, 5_, zer--Nin mnpms..-1,07_,Ijuriiiivigy, -triwo _r•prlom . imul Aromai,#.00..k.. , ,,,,, 0 • goii,..gin_ 811 171.2 or* _ — ...airli. ,watiAtiii. 'w II, Da•,.5F.1111 IS lb ka mi._ ari...._•,..sp..._,...iv ArAbil ,,,.-rg oleo,,o, '_ _, , sow 'NW-.ss,•-. 1•j . . ,go\i „. "' :a 14, ropr,o)ii k larELI- ,- ',• t''''' I ijigii--11 ,ali'i!INI; !,,g...:. ,.:,.: .tsoilidisigniti..4, , • 1. ce1 vi • Mtakf---zwiarrIAMI TR •& -741 81 Lai." "21:"71 '111 '7 t4c ,i*,#_1_ -=:.•wor' - 'ro,-,,,- norqsa? , 1 _ r,i ...w .,---.7aa "-NI:4 , 4 • ',-- „,.,T.i, N, ' al •--,, - AA *to AII [Ipikl)7A 4%-.11'i:411 .1*.10, TO ia INF*ertk-_.--E ii: ii, -.11;:41 IN. 11611111 ‘Th-- -. litli"rf 'N',... 22 723N,-- , - ',' '" 23 723N R5E E III .11,1 Irt Am tillio_unliffsvii-ity..- -11,-Empir i‘ A 0 IIII 41 1 1 ) 131 Vi wit' .mrimma.....1- ..---A*144k t-:-44.-74Lii&k. : ApTtall op, ,. 1 iipr . iii-6.4.116r,'Li•_ 'N iiEl.i7---4 v-- A -- i,i7‘. - - 111 1 -ia 111.'1"...•'i 'in 0,4,P I ' " PO e - .4,,r riat, fp-i, VAL .. thii' AVEIII y , R EPA -` - 1 4f1 NI - '...'1% 4E •aJ LINZ.' itlt". , t444`----- --- gre•tii''''iL _ 26 -7F. ,1, • '-'I MOM Liii 511 i ;RD 17101 t 9111101 I! 0 825! _ tiN ',_ la P NW- SWAY'4, , r --......11 ! r,,,:. , , .11,-:, )7 hi&fib.. -,-.4,-,•---;;-tr le I iiiiii 4 W§lE. • ' ip . , : 16, , _ 1 • :a , 1 , i • p .1. '6allilliklir iii.11.111:f":6-;2'3N'A.. i it i. EE,3N-a.:_lti • • t iv 1.4 t. t. 7as--:_11.9, 6:11' • . 1.1 •'s kai •016.....1.1. E • ' 833 r ,---:-----:-:.EM:E5- ' 1 '''!"•111 rdL*Tiq r . -' . A in ,rlitilli 1 , . it r Am. 10 _ NY j -K:i:i:i:i3 0: --.. 22N R4E er, _ , , 4, . min „I. vitt . .----1* .... 2 722N R5E MMENNININIIMMINiamomm ......-..---,............,..........—........."1.—...- HFNIDRNTrel MIXED USE CENTER • May Include Overlay Districts. See Appendix TT 1 RC Resource Conservation ti Center Neighborhood. maps. For additional regulations in Overlay I Districts, please see RUC 4-3. r----1 I R-1 I Residential 1 du/ac Center Suburban. IR-5 I Residential 6 du/ac r-i Center Downtown* (P) Publicly owned I R-8 I Residential 8 du/ac I-1 Center Office Residential ----Renton City Limits I—I Residential Manufactured Homes falltiERCAIL - -Adjacent City Limits FT Residential 10 du/sc Commercial Arterial. swum,Book Pages Boundary pm 1-7 Commercial Office.CEO Residential 14 du/ac KROLL co Residential Multi-Family Infill f-1 Convenience Commercial r-i Residential Multi-Family Neighborhood Center INDusTR. PAGE# PAGE IRM-C I Residential Multi-Family Suburban Center I IN I Industrial - Heavy SECT/TOWN/RANGE IRN-U I Residential Multi-Family Urban Center* El Industrial - Medium INDEX 1 IL I Industrial - Light c le) f City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public vvorks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEE REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 'O C2 COMMENTS DUE: JULY 2 002 APPLICATION NO: LUA-02-079, 4-A, SA-A, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JU ,2002 APPLICANT: Kohl Excavating PROJECT MANAGE . Jason E.Jordan PROJECT TITLE: Kohl RV& Boat Storage WORK ORDER NO. 77008 LOCATION: 3330 East Valley Road SITE AREA: 4.13 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): 60,968 SF SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL:The applicant, Kohl Excavating, has requested to construct a RV and Boat Storage area. The application will require environmental review(SEPA),an Administrative Conditional Use Permit and Administrative Site Plan Review approval. The proposed RV and Boat storage area has been designed to include six covered storage buildings(totaling approximately 60,968 square feet)containing 113 storage spaces and 67 uncovered storage spaces.The covered storage stalls are proposed to be 12 feet wide by 40 feet long and the uncovered storage stalls are proposed at 12 feet wide by 22 feet long. An existing 1,600 square foot office is proposed to remain in the southwest corner of the property. Access to the site is proposed from East Valley Road. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water LightGlare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet 32 (:a/14) 10 -day/cL 1 Ccifac htc eon)m B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additionalelqutIA information is needed to property assess this proposal. -te-02-- Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Routing Rev.10/93 PROJECT LUA 02-079, CU-A, SA-A, ECF Kohl RV & Boat Storage City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL &DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET (Continuation) POLICE RELATED COMMENTS 32 Police Calls for Service Estimated Annually CONSTRUCTION PHASE To protect materials and equipment it is recommended that all materials and tools be locked up when not in use. The site will need security lighting and any construction trailer should be completely fenced in with portable chain-link fencing. The fence will provide both a physical and psychological barrier to any prospective thief and will demonstrate that this area is private property. Construction trailers should be kept locked when not in use, and should also have a heavy-duty deadbolt installed with no less then a 1-1/2"throw when bolted. Glass windows in the trailer should be shatter-resistant. I also recommend the business post the appropriate "No Trespassing" signs on the property while it's under construction (flier attached). This will aid police in making arrests on the property after hours if suspects are observed vandalizing or stealing building materials. The use of off-duty police officers or private security guards to patrol the site during the hours of darkness is also recommended. COMPLETED BUILDING - facilities One of the most common occurring problems at self storage are locks being cut on the storage units themselves. Access is gained either by following customers onto the property or by scaling the fence that may be surrounding the storage complex. Theft from storage facilities can be deterred by explaining to customers the disadvantages in letting unknown individuals onto the property, and to also invest in a good lock. Landscaping around the exterior of the building should not be too dense or high. It is important to allow visibility. Too much landscaping will give the building the look of a ;I fortress and possibly give a burglar sufficient coverage to break into the buildings, especially during the hours of darkness. � ,n. Trespass r,_,. IPwxsA®oogG !i I: USINES ' Enforcement WATCH Quite often, business owners and managers are faced with crimes that occur on the property after the businesses are closed and the employees have gone home. Some of the crimes that occur are burglary, vandalism, graffiti, trespassing, drug dealing and robbery in the parking lots. There is a way for police and business owners to discourage these types of crimes from taking place on private property, and that is by enforcing the City of Renton's Municipal Trespass Code 6-18-10. In order for police to be able to make an arrest for Trespass, business owners or managers need to purchase signs and display them in conspicuous areas on the property. These signs need to include the following language: 1. Indicate that the subject property is privately owned and; 2. Uninvited presence on the specified property is not permitted during the hours the business is closed, and; 3. Violators will be subject to criminal sanctions pursuant to Renton City Code 6-18-10. MOST IMPORTANTLY-THE SIGNS SHOULD BE CONSPICUOUS FROM ALL POSSIBLE POINTS OF ENTRY TO THE PROPERTY,AND ALSO BE PLACED ON THE EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDINGS. This way when a suspect is arrested, he/she will not be able to claim as a defense that he/she did not know he or she was trespassing. EXAMPLES FOR TRESPASS SIGNS: NO TRESPASSING NO TRESPASSING This is private property. Persons without specific No Trespassing after business hours business are not authorized to be on the premises (insert specific times). Anyone on the between the hours of (insert the hours your business is premises after business hours is subject closed). to arrest and/or citation for Criminal Violators are subject to arrest and/or citation for Trespass and/or impoundment of criminal Trespass pursuant to Renton City Code#6-18- vehicle. Per Renton City Code #6-18- 10.. 10. By enforcing the Trespass Ordinance,business owners and police will be sending a message to criminals that they are not allowed to conduct criminal activity on the property. In making arrests for Trespass, police may be preventing the more serious crimes from taking place. COURTESY OF RENTON POLICE DEPARTMENT CRIME PREVENTION UNIT 4 3 0 - 7 5 2 1 City of Renron Department of Planning/Building/Public WorKs 9 ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET tl REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: < J(�✓7L A(,�./(j(� �(,/,�,l��C/ COMMENTS DUE: JULY 24, 2002 APPLICATION NO: LUA-02-079,CU-A, SA-A, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 10,2002 APPLICANT: Kohl Excavating PROJECT MANAGER: Jason E.JordarRCITY OF v ECEIVVED PROJECT TITLE: Kohl RV& Boat Storage WORK ORDER NO: 77008 LOCATION: 3330 East Valley Road JUL 1 0 2002 SITE AREA: 4.13 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): 60,968 SFBUILDING DIVISION SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL:The applicant, Kohl Excavating, has requested to construct a RV and Boat Storage area. The application will require environmental review(SEPA), an Administrative Conditional Use Permit and Administrative Site Plan Review approval. The proposed RV and Boat storage area has been designed to include six covered storage buildings(totaling approximately 60,968 square feet)containing 113 storage spaces and 67 uncovered storage spaces.The covered storage stalls are proposed to be 12 feet wide by 40 feet long and the uncovered storage stalls are proposed at 12 feet wide by 22 feet long. An existing 1,600 square foot office is proposed to remain in the southwest corner of the property. Access to the site is proposed from East Valley Road. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS A Q'/ ' ` We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional inform on is neede toproperl a ess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative ei/VNDate ?.‘j" 3/ e2.) Routing Rev.10/93 City of Rt...._.. Department of Planning/Building/Public .. ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: �' an � II- COMMENTS DUE: JULY 24, 2002 APPLICATION NO: LUA-02-079,CU-A, SA-A, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 10,2002 APPLICANT: Kohl Excavating PROJECT MANAGER: Jason E.JordarsiTY or RENTON RECEIVED PROJECT TITLE: Kohl RV& Boat Storage .. WORK ORDER NO: 77008 LOCATION: 3330 East Valley Road JUL 1 5 2002 SITE AREA: 4.13 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): 60,968 SF UILOING DIVISION SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL:The applicant, Kohl Excavating, has requested to construct a RV and Boat Storage area. The application will require environmental review(SEPA), an Administrative Conditional Use Permit and Administrative Site Plan Review approval. The proposed RV and Boat storage area has been designed to include six covered storage buildings(totaling approximately 60,968 square feet)containing 113 storage spaces and 67 uncovered storage spaces.The covered storage stalls are proposed to be 12 feet wide by 40 feet long and the uncovered storage stalls are proposed at 12 feet wide by 22 feet long. An existing 1,600 square foot office is proposed to remain in the southwest corner of the property. Access to the site is proposed from East Valley Road. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare __ Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS Jet_ 044/, We have reviewed this application with particular attentio to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information needed to pr perly a sess this proposal. -- / 7 6 7j Signature of Director or Authorized presentative Date )14 Routing Rev.10/93 A TY O + .et CITY OF RENTON FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU MEMORANDUM DATE: July 24, 2002 TO: Jason Jordan, Associate Planner FROM: Corey Thomas, Plans Review Inspector SUBJECT: Kohl RV & Boat Storage Project MITIGATION ITEMS; 1. A fire mitigation fee of$31,703.36 is required based on $0.52 per square foot of building area. FIRE CODE REQUIREMENTS: 1. The preliminary fire flow is 3,500 gpm, one hydrant is required within 150 feet of the structure and three additional hydrants are required within 300 feet of the structures. Proposed 10-inch loop appears adequate with the addition of one hydrant and the relocation of one of the proposed hydrants required. 2. Building E only is required to have an approved, monitored fire sprinkler system. Separate plans and permits are required for the installation of fire sprinkler and monitoring systems. All other buildings as proposed do not require fire sprinkler systems. 3. Fire Department access roadways are required to within 150 feet of all portions of the building exterior. Roadways are a minimum 20-feet in width with a turning radius of 45-foot outside and 25-foot inside. Secondary access road required. All roads required to be marked as fire lanes. Roadway proposed appears adequate. 4. Fire department dead-end access roadways over 150 feet in length are required to have an approved turnaround. 5. Provide a list of the flammable, combustible liquids and any hazardous chemical to be used or stored on site. CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: July 24,2002 TO: Jason Jordan FROM: Arneta Henninger X7298 SUBJECT: KOHL APPLICATION LUA 02-079 CU SA 3330 EAST VALLEY ROAD I have completed my review on the above application located in Section 30, Township 23N, Range 5E and have the following comments. WATER: • This project site is located in the 196 Water Pressure Zone. The static water pressure at the street level is about 79 psi. • There is an existing 12" watermain located in East Valley Rd (see City of Renton water drawing W-2220 for additional information). • Construction of a commercial building will trigger a separate review. Per the City of Renton Fire Marshall the preliminary fire flow is 3500 GPM. Additional plan review will be required at the time of building permit review. Additional watermain improvements including fire hydrants, a Fire Sprinkler system, and a DDCVA will be required to meet the fire flow demand as determined by the Fire Marshall. • The conceptual utility plan showing the 10" watermain loop needs to be modified to include one additional fire hydrant and to include relocating the fire hydrant on the east side to the north side mid parcel. There will be detailed plan review at the time of building permit submittal. • The project is not located in the Aquifer Protection Zone. • Water System Development Charges of $0.154 per square foot gross area may be required if not previously paid. The Development Charges are collected as part of the construction permit. Please note that any parcel that currently has water and or sewer service may be eligible for a prorated system development charge. Your project will be reviewed to determine how much redevelopment credit applies. Kohl Application East Valley Road SANITARY SEWER: • There is an existing 10" sanitary sewer main located in East Valley Road. • Applicant needs to submit a sanitary sewer plan showing how they will apply sewer service to the building. • Permanent structures are not allowed over City utilities. • If the structures are treated as buildings and are required to have floor drains, then the floor drains are required to be connected to sanitary sewer subject to the installation of a grease interceptor or oil/water separator as determined at the time of plan review. • System Development Charges (SDC) are $0.106 per square foot. These fees are collected at the time a construction permit is issued. Please note that any parcel that currently has water and or sewer service may be eligible for a prorated system development charge. Your project will be reviewed to determine how much redevelopment credit applies. STREET IMPROVEMENTS: • Construction of a commercial building would trigger a separate review. • The number and location of the driveways shown are acceptable to Transportation. The north driveway approach shall be reserved only for Emergency Vehicle Use. • The Traffic Impact Analysis is currently under review at this time. • Transportation Mitigation Fees of approximately $75 per net new trip are required to be paid. • Street lighting is required to be installed for this project on the public right-of- way. • All new electrical, phone and cable services to the site must be undergrounded. Construction of these franchise utilities must be inspected and approved by a City of Renton public works inspector prior to completion of the building. STORM DRAINAGE: • There are storm drainage facilities in East Valley Road. • A conceptual drainage plan and report has been submitted and is under review at this time. \\DAEDALUS\SYS2\USERS\AHENNING\Projects\KohIGF.doc\ajh Kohl Application East Valley Road • The Surface Water SDC fees are $0.183 (but not less than $525) per square foot of new impervious area. These fees are collected at the time a construction permit is issued. GENERAL: • All required utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed Civil Engineer. • All plans shall be tied to a minimum of two of the City of Renton Horizontal and Vertical Control Network. • Permit application must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. The fee for review and inspection of these improvements is 5% of the first $100,000 of the estimated construction costs; 4% of anything over $100,000 but less than $200,000, and 3% of anything over $200,000. Half of the fee must be paid upon application for building and construction permits, and the remainder when the permits are issued. There may be additional fees for water service related expenses. See Drafting Standards. cc: Kayren K. III \\DAEDALUS\SYS2\USERS\AHENNING\Projects\KohIGF.doc\ajh 1 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 6.0rip' r 4�J lOn ,)Q/Vices COMMENTS DUE: JULY 24, 2002 OITY Or rICPJTp", APPLICATION NO: LUA-02-079,CU-A, SA-A, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 10,2002 RECEIVED APPLICANT: Kohl Excavating PROJECT MANAGER: Jason E.Jordan JUL 10 2002 PROJECT TITLE: Kohl RV& Boat Storage WORK ORDER NO: 77008 LOCATION: 3330 East Valley Road BUILDING DIVISION SITE AREA: 4.13 acres BUILDING AREA(gross): 60,968 SF SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL:The applicant, Kohl Excavating, has requested to construct a RV and Boat Storage area. The application will require environmental review(SEPA), an Administrative Conditional Use Permit and Administrative Site Plan Review approval. The proposed RV and Boat storage area has been designed to include six covered storage buildings(totaling approximately 60,968 square feet)containing 113 storage spaces and 67 uncovered storage spaces.The covered storage stalls are proposed to be 12 feet wide by 40 feet long and the uncovered storage stalls are proposed at 12 feet wide by 22 feet long. An existing 1,600 square foot office is proposed to remain in the southwest corner of the property. Access to the site is proposed from East Valley Road. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS V LI / / 7 / -4,c5re'-- .a p- e......12"...7-LA,L.4.4.A.4.4„.7\ We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly/assess this proposal. — �0 �i-Z (.. �.? 2.S C;I2 Signature of Director or Authorized ive Date Routing Rev.10/93 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: FI vo Pre VPA fine COMMENTS DUE: JULY 24, 2002 APPLICATION NO: LUA-02-079, CU-A, SA-A, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 10,2002 APPLICANT: Kohl Excavating PROJECT MANAGER: Jason E.Jor n PROJECT TITLE: Kohl RV& Boat Storage WORK ORDER NO: 77008 • LOCATION: 3330 East Valley Road JUL 1 0 2002 SITE AREA: 4.13 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): 60,968 SF__ SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL:The applicant, Kohl Excavating, has requested to construct a RV anii Boat Storage area. The —J application will require environmental review(SEPA), an Administrative Conditional Use Permit and Administrative Site Plan Review approval. The proposed RV and Boat storage area has been designed to include six covered storage buildings(totaling approximately 60,968 square feet)containing 113 storage spaces and 67 uncovered storage spaces.The covered storage stalls are proposed to be 12 feet wide by 40 feet long and the uncovered storage stalls are proposed at 12 feet wide by 22 feet long. An existing 1,600 square foot office is proposed to remain in the southwest corner of the property. Access to the site is proposed from East Valley Road. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet C1 C Li 4,..4,0 B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 14-1 Ill/42. Signature of Director or Authorized Repres ative Date Routing Rev.10/93 TY . + CITY OF RENTON FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU 9. MEMORANDUM DATE: July 15, 2002 TO: Jason Jordan, Associate Planner FROM: Corey Thomas, Plans Review Inspector SUBJECT: Kohl RV & Boat Storage Project MITIGATION ITEMS; 1. A fire mitigation fee of$31,703.36 is required based on $0.52 per square foot of building area. FIRE CODE REQUIREMENTS: 1. The preliminary fire flow is 3,500 gpm, one hydrant is required within 150 feet of the structure and three additional hydrants are required within 300 feet of the structures. Proposed 10-inch loop appears adequate with the addition of one hydrant and the relocation of one of the proposed hydrants required. 2. Building E only is required to have an approved, monitored fire sprinkler system. Separate plans and permits are required for the installation of fire sprinkler and monitoring systems. All other buildings as proposed do not require fire sprinkler systems. 3. Fire Department access roadways are required to within 150 feet of all portions of the building exterior. Roadways are a minimum 20-feet in width with a turning radius of 45-foot outside and 25-foot inside. Secondary access road required. All roads required to be marked as fire lanes. Roadway proposed appears adequate. 4. Fire department dead-end access roadways over 150 feet in length are required to have an approved turnaround. 5. Provide a list of the flammable, combustible liquids and any hazardous chemical to be used or stored on site. City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public WorKs ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: pa r k.3 COMMENTS DUE: JULY 24, 2002 APPLICATION NO: LUA-02-079,CU-A, SA-A, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 10,2002 APPLICANT: Kohl Excavating PROJECT MANAGER: Jason E.Jordan1111 PROJECT TITLE: Kohl RV& Boat Storage WORK ORDER NO: 77008 LOCATION: 3330 East Valley Road SITE AREA: 4.13 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): 60,968 SF SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL:The applicant, Kohl Excavating, has requested to construct a RV and Boat Storage area. The application will require environmental review(SEPA), an Administrative Conditional Use Permit and Administrative Site Plan Review approval. The proposed RV and Boat storage area has been designed to include six covered storage buildings(totaling approximately 60,968 square feet)containing 113 storage spaces and 67 uncovered storage spaces.The covered storage stalls are proposed to be 12 feet wide by 40 feet long and the uncovered storage stalls are proposed at 12 feet wide by 22 feet long. An existing 1,600 square foot office is proposed to remain in the southwest corner of the property. Access to the site is proposed from East Valley Road. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 F t atmea4tec2-6) B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS 1 C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS 1' We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and ve identified areas of probable impact or areas w re additional inf rmation eeded to proper! assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Routing Rev.10/93 fi ,1TY OF RENTON 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Printed: 07-25-2002 Land Use Actions RECEIPT Permit#: LUA02-079 Payment Made: 07/25/2002 11:02 AM Receipt Number: R0204218 Total Payment: 500.00 Payee: DC Properties it, Current Payment Made to the Following Items: Trans Account Code Description Amount 5020 000.345.81.00.0017 Site Plan Approval 500.00 Payments made for this receipt Trans Method Description Amount Payment Check 1078 500.00 Account Balances Trans Account Code Description Balance Due 3021 303.000.00.345.85 Park Mitigation Fee .00 5006 000.345.81.00.0002 Annexation Fees .00 5007 000.345.81.00.0003 Appeals/Waivers .00 5008 000.345.81.00.0004 Binding Site/Short Plat .00 5009 000.345.81.00.0006 Conditional Use Fees .00 5010 000.345.81.00.0007 Environmental Review .00 5011 000.345.81.00.0008 Prelim/Tentative Plat .00 5012 000.345.81.00. 0009 Final Plat .00 5013 000.345.81.00.0010 PUD .00 5014 000.345.81.00.0011 Grading & Filling Fees .00 5015 000.345.81.00.0012 Lot Line Adjustment .00 5016 000.345.81.00.0013 Mobile Home Parks .00 5017 000.345.81.00.0014 Rezone .00 5018 000.345.81.00. 0015 Routine Vegetation Mgmt .00 5019 000.345.81.00.0016 Shoreline Subst Dev .00 5020 000.345.81.00.0017 Site Plan Approval .00 5021 000.345.81.00.0018 Special Permit Fees .00 5022 000.345.81.00.0019 Variance Fees .00 5023 0 .00 5024 000.345.81.00.0024 Conditional Approval Fee .00 5036 000.345.81.00.0005 Comprehensive Plan Amend .00 5909 000.341.60.00.0024 Booklets/EIS/Copies .00 5941 000.341.50.00. 0000 Maps (Taxable) .00 5954 604.237.00.00.0000 Special Deposits .00 5955 000.05.519.90.42 .1 Postage .00 5998 000.231.70.00.0000 Tax .00 Remaining Balance Due: $0.00 CITY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION LIST OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS within 300 feet of the subject site PROJECT NAME: kZ©HL, CoAd BOAT' �TUR E APPLICATION NO: L-1/1 N 07-079 OU '/I 5,0 ' , E Lf- The following is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. The Development Services Division will notify these individuals of the proposed development. NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER I. Lecuyer Farn ly LLC 149CO ;n e-rurbn eve.S. 12.53-(80- 0030 210 Sec* le, LOA . 98I(043 12-.53ad - 003Z 2 . B r4kke. Fmr Q S4 z. H o nos 170\rt (axe (ZS"3 80 - (Do 13e- (e\1 ie_, LPt . 3. Don L . Ta+r-o 3 zU 1 S. 3o2305-- `�o►`-t Re , ( t)tas- . `lS 4 . CA-N of ReAr\(-Dr Io6S s . C-sr y Wo.> 30 WP aSI: 302-346- ((� 5 . C � . Mast, sv,\ 9's S. 138B^ 302_3 9s- 90607 Se co-4-te_ I I(o a to • _Lvnr -t�s vs c. 200 3 (e. \lo ite _ f-I� � � �-vl �'� �'�0 S 5 Y 3o Z3 ate- �0 70 yo uk C . i c R� DEVELOP? �. CITy '41INNING JUN2 ? . RECEIVED (Attach additional sheets, if necessary) (Continued) NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER Applicant Certification R-M FS .3 NE-GE-lQ, , hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property (Print Name) owners and their addresses were obtained from: ,t Title Company Records ❑ King County Assessors Records Signed Date (Applicant) NOTARY ATTESTED: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington, residing at on the day of , 20 Signed (Notary Public) ****For Cityof Renton t4,u, ARILYN KAMCHEFF CERTIFICATION OF M dicaTAR'Y PUBLIC STATE OF WASHINGTON hereby certify that notices of the Q OtRA ailed to (City Ernp1oyeej Jt y 29, 2003 each listed,pfopprty owner on���,� `,l a/i Signed � �`% - r Date: NOTARY ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing at aX r , 1 on the l r z. day of ) 20 l t' r ._ a- y Signed ) ) :` r A 64- MARILYN KI4A I( listprop.doc � ACHEFF REV 03/00 MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES:6-29-03 2 fetroScan/King (WA) Owner : Lecuyer Family L L C Parcel# : 125380 0030 09 111 Site :3351 E Valley Rd Renton 98055 Sale Date :05/07/1996 Mail : 14900 Interurban Ave S#210 Seattle Wa 98168 Sale Price Use : 195 Ind,Warehouse Asd.V :$4,238,600 Lgl :BLK 1 LOT 2-3 BURL N ORILLIA IND Q : SW S :30 T:23N R : 05E Bedrm : Bth F3H: / / Stories: 1 BldgSF:97,322 Ac:2.78 YB:1996 Ph: Owner :Lecuyer Family L L C Parcel# : 125380 0032 07 Site :3351 E Valley Rd Renton 98055 Sale Date :05/07/1996 Mail : 14900 Interurban Ave S#210 Seattle Wa 98168 Sale Price Use :316 Vacant,Industrial Asd.V :$359,100 }t} Lgl :BLK 1 LOT 2-3 BURL N ORILLIA IND Q : SW S : 30 T:23N R :05E Bedrm : Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: 1.65 YB: Ph: Owner :Brekke Properties Parcel# : 125380 0034 05 Site :3051 E Valley Rd Renton 98055 Sale Date :08/24/2000 Mail :8592 Hunts Point Ln Bellevue Wa 98004 Sale Price :$1,950,000 Full Use :223 Ind,Industrial,Gen Purpose Asd.V : $1,728,800 '1 Lgl :BLK 1 LOT 2-3 BURL N ORILLIA IND Q : SW S :30 T:23N R :05E Bedrm : Bth F3H: / / Stories: 1 BldgSF: 30,498 Ac: 1.69 YB:1996 Ph:425-451-1511 n Owner :Tatro Don L Parcel# :302305 9019 02 d Site : 3211 Talbot Rd S Renton 98055 Sale Date n Mail : 3211 Talbot Rd S Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price : b Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $262,000 Lgl : STR 302305 TAXLOT 19 POR OF S 1/2 Q : SE S :30 T: 23N R :05E Bedrm : 5 Bth F3H:2 / /1 Stories: 2 BldgSF:3,500 Ac: 6.32 YB:1930 Ph:425-255-0329 E Owner : City Of Renton Parcel# :302305 9062 08 Site : *No Site Address*Renton Sale Date :07/01/1986 Mail : 1055 S Grady Way Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price Use : 300 Vacant,Residential Asd.V : $94,000 Lgl : STR 302305 TAXLOT 62 POR OF W Q :SE S : 30 T:23N R :05E Bedrm : Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: 6.47 YB: Ph:425-228-3568 Owner :Magnuson C A Parcel# :302305 9067 03 .h Site : 3400 E Valley Rd Renton 98055 Sale Date Mail :918 S 138Th St Seattle Wa 98168 Sale Price Use :216 Ind,Service Bldg Asd.V : $1,118,500 Lgl : STR 302305 TAXLOT 67 POR OF S 1/2 Q : SE S : 30 T:23N R : 05E Bedrm : Bth F3H: / / Stories: 1 BldgSF:4,000 Ac: 5.65 YB:1996 Ph: 206-242-2535 Owner :Magnuson C A Parcel# :302305 9067 03 4' Site : 3400 E Valley Rd Renton 98055 Sale Date Mail :918 S 138Th St Seattle Wa 98168 Sale Price Use :216 Ind,Service Bldg Asd.V : $1,118,500 Lgl : STR 302305 TAXLOT 67 POR OF S 1/2 Q : SE S :30 T:23N R :05E Bedrm : Bth F3H: / / Stories: 1 BldgSF: 1,160 Ac: 5.65 YB:1996 Ph:206-242-2535 Owner : Imperials Music&Youth Organization Parcel# :302305 9070 08 Site : 3100 E Valley Rd Renton 98055 Sale Date :03/30/1994 Mail :2003 SE Maple Valley Hwy Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price :$1,250,000 Full Use : 166 Pub,Club Asd.V :$2,082,100 Lgl : STR 302305 TAXLOT 70 PORTION OF N Q : SE S :30 T:23N R :05E !' Bedrm : Bth F3H: / / Stories: 1 BldgSF:20,000 Ac:4.20 YB:1994 Ph:425-228-4506 l', Information compiled from various sources.Real Estate Solutions makes no representations 7etroScan/King (WA) Owner :Dc Properties Parcel# :302305 9090 04 Site :3330 E Valley Rd Renton 98055 Sale Date :01/05/2000 Mail :3330 E Valley Rd Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price . Use : 106 Off,Office Building Asd.V : $1,130,700 Lgl :STR 302305 TAXLOT 90 POR OF S 1/2 Q : SE S :30 T:23N R :05E Bedrm : Bth F3H: / / Stories: 1 BldgSF: 1,600 Ac:4.27 YB:1969 Ph: Owner :City Of Renton Parcel# : 302305 9119 0/ Site : *No Site Address*Renton Sale Date . Mail : 1055 S Grady Way Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price : Use :300 Vacant,Residential Asd.V :$38,000 Lgl : STR 302305 TAXLOT 119 LOT 4 LESS Q :SE S : 30 T:23N R :05E Bedrm : Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac:2.73 YB: Ph:425-228-3568 Information compiledfrom various sources.Real Estate Solutions makes no f P representations • (cY 0 t, oR • .41 "P�NT�� NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON- SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (DNS-M) DATE: July 10,2002 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-02-079,CU-A,ECF,SA-A APPLICATION NAME: KOHL RV AND BOAT STORAGE PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant, Kohl Excavating, has requested to construct a RV and Boat Storage area. The application will require environmental review(SEPA),an Administrative Conditional Use Permit and Administrative Slte Plan Review approval. The proposed RV and Boat storage area has been designed to include six covered storage buildings(totaling approximately 60,968 square feet)containing 113 storage spaces and 67 uncovered storage spaces.The covered storage stalls are proposed to be 12 feet wide by 40 feet long and the uncovered storage stalls are proposed at 12 feet wide by 22 feet long. An existing 1,600 square foot office is proposed to remain in the southwest corner of the property. Access to the site is proposed from East Valley Road. PROJECT LOCATION: 3330 East Valley Road OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE,MITIGATED(DNS-M): As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore,as permitted under the RCW 43.21 C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS-M process to give notice that a DNS- M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance- Mitigated(DNS-M). A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: June 27,2002 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: July 10,2002 Permits/Review Requested: Environmental(SEPA)Review,Administrative Conditional Use Permit, Administrative Site Plan Review Other Permits which may be required: City of Renton Building&Construction Permits Requested Studies: N/A Location where application may be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 PUBLIC HEARING: N/A CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: • Analytical process Land Use: The subject site is designated Employment Area—Valley(EAV)on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map and Commercial Arterial(CA)or the City's Zoning Map. The proposed use of the site,as a vehicle storage facility,is considered an Administrative Conditional Use in the CA zone. Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Geotechnical Study,Traffic Study&Drainage Report Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: The project will be subject to the City's SEPA Ordinance,Zoning Code,Public Works Standards,Uniform Building Code,Uniform Fire Code,and other applicable codes and regulations as appropriate. NOTICE OF APPLICATION Proposed Mitigation Measures: 1. The applicant will be required to pay the opriate Fire Mitigation Fee based on$0.52 per square t of new construction. I 2. The applicant will be required to pay the appropriate Traffic Mitigation Fee based on$75 per net new average daily trip associated with the project. 3. Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Measures shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project. 4. The applicant will be required to follow the recommendations contained with the Geotechnical Engineering Study prepared for this project with regard to the disturbance,preparation and construction of the site. Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Jason E. Jordan, Associate Planner, Development Services Division,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on July 24,2002. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail,contact the Project Manager. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: JASON E.JORDAN (425)430-7219 PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION ., 1 J" i! .a. ;' r.......,,.._.© ; ;�.. ... rt7 1 i CA J IZz' •.. ►.:A�� 0 1„y41Y+ .N.. ai it o �— ›.. . 9 , ..a. .SW MX •ST.s _?._ ,,...6„,,,Sen _ €,,to, , 11' I t t,...tt 1 I G III.1 CC l i } \> . u ! ; h = 0 ,SiHJ I t_:. E,� a' r' ..... -. .e v �NWff -. i1 •z 414 - il- �. 0 t of b I - i c 1z� 'i ? - G w n..A 5. I m i .. _._'. l 9 Js I.;y F E J. ... M 5 r fry.0 .w..a of ]\ III . 4- i8 51TE i" fg Ect m a r o< \1 1II i e i a��o vE ..,e R , "hB 2 _ 6 G z o 0 . 3ATN Y ST.1,. —.,.-. 9\ K u�..r ,,m m i .I �/i VPFM1r �, Y".III ...0 uc. 1 2 0 ' ',/'ry I�\l �i . i ((( Air-R. Yn� CA Tl':�Y �(� GRAPHIC SCALE e U 1 --- . t11�q►�J{-r" ,.;a -... 1•-2ar L 1 N ' _G T, O N ""a. W 3 ., , ..� JJT-- M J • ' ..�_ 37r1 i i NOTE e,AsE i ; 'q w.w ��,�. "•.••— N Qi R T N E R N I " "_' •a JAEGER ENGINEERING a� 9119 South 201th Place ea �_ Kent. WA. 98031 ant No.(135)t130-0 w —L— iam i Na.(253)350-015555 If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project, complete this form and return to:City of Renton,Development Planning, 1055 So.Grady Way, Renton,WA 98055. . File NoJName: LUA-02-079,CU-A,SA-A,ECF/KOHL RV&BOAT STORAGE NAME: ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO.: NOTICE OF APPLICATION I %y r ) CITY Alt RENTON ..ii Planning/Building/PublicWorks Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator " 11 July 10, 2002 i Mr. James Jaeger Jaeger Engineering 9419 South 204th Place Kent, WA 98031 SUBJECT: Kohl R.V. and Boat Storage Project No. LUA-02-079, CU-A, SA-A, ECF 1 Dear Mr. Jaeger: The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on August 6, 2002. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. Please contact me, at (425) 430-7219, if you have any questions. Sincerely, 4. Jason . Jordan Associate Planner cc: DC Properties/Owner dLLtlpldl i.el 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 R E N T O N 6)This paper contains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE l3zo0 CITY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION LAND USE PERMIT MASTER APPLICATION PROPERTY OWNER(S) ( PROJECT INFORMATION NAME: PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: D C PRo PetR-r-t s B0Prr STbRPtGE_ ADDRESS: 333 0 tsts.-r \bNLLE•( Rotes PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION AND ZIP CODE: CITY: ZIP: _ 3330 �A r VI LL-E`{ ROAD RLNTa q�OsS R1-�MTt91-1, WPr• 446065- TELEPHONE NUMBER: KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): 642S) Zs l - es 2-0 APPLICANT (if other than owner) 302 3o5- 9Og O EXISTING LAND USE(S): NAME: CON STRUCT10 N O FPfc.- 4 HARD KOHL, Ex CAN PrT1 NC. PROPOSED LAND USE(S): COMPANY(if applicable): RN. 4 6or .r S PtcEF yps2D EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: ADDRESS: .F 3330 EflrSI- Va•L1_6y ROAD •SED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION CITY: ZIP: b3 D(If f�L�.t' PLANNINON K EI-cro t� NTON E TELEPHONE NUMBER EX 41C.2 7N C A 42.$) zs-I - sa o z PREGEWED IG (if applicable): CONTACT PERSON µ� SITE AREA (in square feet): 1 79 17ci3 { NAME: SQUARE FOOTAGE OF ROADWAYS TO BE DEDICATED I' .TP 40 el TPrEG P. E• FOR SUBDIVISIONS OR PRIVATE STREETS SERVING THREE LOTS OR MORE (if applicable): COMPANY(if applicable): ETA EGER ECG NONE PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET ADDRESS: ACRE(if applicable): NPt 941 s. ��- Prc-EP� NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS(if applicable): CITY: ZIP: I`A K ErvT' \IV No . b0.3 NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS(if applicable): TELEPHONE NUMBER AND E-MAIL ADDRESS: NA (253) la so-Oct 34, ek.3s@aol.com masterap.doc Revised January 2002 I OJECT INFORMATION (cor___..iued) NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): PROJECT VALUE: 4 4SOt 00 c7 NPs SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF BUILDINGS(if applicable): t,,i(i ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL None- BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): i\iA. ❑ AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA ONE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL ❑ AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA TWO BUILDINGS(if applicable): (008 tog, SF ❑ FLOOD HAZARD AREA sq.ft. SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL ❑ GEOLOGIC HAZARD sq.ft. BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): ❑ HABITAT CONSERVATION sq.ft. I WO cF ❑ SHORELINE STREAMS AND LAKES sq.ft. NET FLOOR AREA OF NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if ❑ WETLANDS sq.ft. applicable): /oO,Q be SF NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW PROJECT(if applicable): ( LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (Attach legal description on separate sheet with the following information included) SITUATE IN THE SF- QUARTER OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 2-3 , RANGE 5, IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES Check all application types that apply -- City staff will determine fees. ANNEXATION(A) $ SHORELINE REVIEWS _COMP PLAN AMENDMENT(CPA) $ _ _CONDITIONAL USE(SM-C) $ X CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT(CU-A,CU-H) $ _1,000-UQ _EXEMPTION(SME) $ NO CHARGE f--ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW(ECF) $ JD0.0 _SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT(SM) $ GRADE&FILL PERMIT(GF) $ VARIANCE(SM-V) $ (No.Cu.Yds: ) $ REZONE(R) $ SUBDIVISION ROUTINE VEGETATION $ _BINDING SITE PLAN(BSP) $ MANAGEMENT PERMIT(RVMP) _FINAL PLAT(FP) $ _SITE PLAN APPROVAL(SA-A,SA-H) $ _LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT(LLA) $ ,SPECIAL PERMIT(SP) $ _PRELIMINARY PLAT(PP) $ TEMPORARY PERMIT(TP) $ _SHORT PLAT(SHPL-A,SHPL-H) $ _VARIANCE(V-A,V-H,V-B) $ (from Section: ) $ Postage: $ .2.r--7,?- WAIVER(W) $ TOTAL FEE $ OTHER: $ AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I I, (Print Name) Deis Ors C 10,,;j6 j ia,,6;,.r✓ declare that I am (please check one) _the current owner of the property involved in this application or X the authorized representative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization)and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that -a`` ' a6q3a./ Jd:1Crc3 (,.h(iS-f,c,a.S i1 signed this instrument and ac , �,i,,it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and pure .` ?,5t0N �Ss me Toned in the instrume t. `'� (Signature of Owner/Representative) / rI r `..Q 4"2 t e. l Notary Public in and for the State of Washington pc�! ‘ E *1 (Signature of Owner/Representative) Notary(Print) 7 lm b e r I y Sh 44(e r r` is nt`� Myappointment expires:9-Z 7 'O 2 '.``'`.("' tti.`y masterap.doc Revised January 2002 ✓ELOPMENT SERVICESAPPLICATIONS DIVISION WAIVER OF SUBivII ITAL REQUIREMENTS Furl LAND USE LAND USE PERMIT SUBMITTAL WAIVED MODIFIED COMMENTS: REQUIREMENTS: BY: BY: Calculations, Survey 1 Density Worksheet 4 Drainage Control Plan 2 Drainage Report 2 Elevations, Architectural 3 AND 4 Elevations, Grading 2 • Existing Covenants (Recorded Copy)4 Existing Easements (Recorded Copy)4 Flood Plain Map, if applicable 4 Floor Plans 3 Ar1D a Geotechnical Report 2 AND 3 Grading Plan, Conceptual 2 Grading Plan, Detailed 2 King County Assessor's Map Indicating Site Landscaping Plan, Conceptual4 Legal Description List of Surrounding Property Owners 4 f Mailing LabeIs or.Propert Owners 4 Map of Existing Site Conditions 4 Master Ap plication Form 4 Monument Cards (one per monument) Parking, Lot Coverage & Landscaping Analysis 4 Plan Reductions (PMTs)4 Postage d' Preapplication Meeting Summary 4 PublIc WorksApproval Letterz Rehabilitation Plan 4 yr This requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services Section PROJECT NAME: �f l C .O J am'✓ 2. Public Works Plan Review Section _ 3. Building Section DEVELOPMENT PLANQaE: / 2 61 4. Development Planning Section CITY OF RENTON JUN 2 1 2002 RECEIVED h:\division.s\develop.ser\dev.plan.ing\waiver.xls REVISED 5/17/00 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISIC WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS LAND USE PERMIT SUBMITTAL —WANED''''.' MODIFIED COMMENTS. REQUIREMENTS: • # BY: Screening Detail 4 Street Profiles'2 Title Report or Plat Certificate 4 • Topography Map (5'contours)a • Traffic Study 2 Tree CuttingNegetation Clearing Plan Urban Center Design Overlay District Report 4 Utilit ies•Plan G enera sized Wetlands Delineation Map 4 LLt O - WetlandsPlanting Plan'4 Wetlands Study 4 Wireless: A Ppl�icant Agreement Staternenl 9 iAb•3 °` . Inventory of Existing Sites 2ANa3 Lease Agreement, Draft 2 AND 3 Map of Existing Site Conditions 2AND3 Map of View Area 2 AND 3 Photosimulations 2AND3 This requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services Section PROJECT NAME: 2. Public Works Plan Review Section 3. Building Section DATE: 4. Development Planning Section h:\division.s\develop.ser\dev.plan.ing\waiver.xls REVISED 5/17/00 A �1 of C�7), RFgirING KOHL PRO PROJECT NARRATIVE AND STORAGE SUN???oo? RFCF/V Fp The proposed project is a 4.13 acre parcel along the east side of East Valley Road, just south of the existing Imperials Bingo Hall. The site address is 3330 East Valley Road, Renton. The existing property is currently being used as the office and construction yard for Kohl Excavating's field operations. The zoning of the property is Commercial Arterial (CA). The adjacent properties are also zoned the same. The zoning across the East Valley Road is Heavy Industrial (IH). The rear or east property line is the State right-of-way line for SR 167. There is a large drainage ditch just within the State R.O.W. that runs all along the east side of the freeway. Full utilities are available within East Valley Road. Water and sanitary sewer service will be provided by the City of Renton. The site has existing water and sewer services. There is no need for additional sewer service, as the proposed new storage space covers will not have any plumbing. The water system will be improved with a new 10" water main loop within the site to provide fire flow to 3 new hydrants and the fire sprinkler systems within each new building. The frontage road, East Valley Road, is fully improved with curb, gutter and sidewalk. No additional frontage improvements are proposed. The existing driveway curb cut near the south property line will be used for the new primary access point. The existing driveway near the north property line will be relocated approx. 10' to the south to provide a second emergency only access point. The new curb cut will be constructed to City standards. The parking lot and driveways will be surfaced with asphalt that will drain to many central catch basins. There will be 6 new buildings with each building being a roof and 3 sides to provide covered storage spaces. 5 of the buildings will be along the north, east and south property lines. There will be one central building that will not have any sides, a roof only. The surfacing under the buildings will also be asphalt. There will be a fire accessible driveway loop through the site and adjacent to all of the buildings. There are no trees on the existing site. There are a few cottonwood trees just east of the site along the freeway ditch. The existing site is covered with a thick, compacted gravel surface. The site is basically flat. It is situated at an elevation of 20 ft. using City of Renton datum. There is a slight drop near the east property line into the 1►: ditch along the freeway. The site will not be graded except to adjust the existing surface to allow for drainage flow to the catch basins. The proposed onsite drainage system will utilize onsite detention storage and biofiltration. The biofiltration swale will be located along the east property line and treat the drainage just before its discharge into the freeway ditch. There is a "finger" of the freeway ditch that protrudes into the site along the north property line. This finger of the ditch will provide a discharge point for the site drainage without having to perform any construction on the State R.O.W. The 6 proposed buildings will total 61 ,000 sq. ft. There will be 180 storage spaces, with 113 being covered and 67 being open. The amount of impervious surface is 3.62 acres. aq id ELOP EVCf7Y OF E LAAIN Arron, ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST JUN 2 7 2002 Purpose of Checklist: RECEIVED The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21 C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly,with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully to the best of your knowledge. In most cases,you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write"do not know"or"does not apply'. Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline,and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for non-project proposals: Complete this checklist for non-project proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply". IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For non-project actions, the references in the checklist to the words"project","applicant", and "property or site"should be read as"proposal","proposer", and "affected geographic area"respectively. 2 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Evaluation For Agency Use Only A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: fi Kohl RV and Boat Storage Facility 2. Name of Applicant: Kohl Excavating 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Owner& Applicant: Contact : Kohl Excavating James Jaeger, P.E. Ivan Christianson Jaeger Engineering 3330 East Valley Road 9419 S. 204 Place Renton, WA. 98055 Kent, WA. 98031 (425) 251-8820 (253) 850-0934 4. Date checklist prepared: May 22, 2002 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton Planning Department. 6. Proposed timing or schedule(including phasing, if applicable): Begin construction in summer of 2002, or as soon as possible after receiving all required approvals. Project will continue with most work being performed during Fall/Summer of 2002. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. There are no plans for future additions, expansion or further activity related to or connected with this proposal. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. A Geotechnical analysis of the existing soils and bearing capacity has been performed. A storm drainage analysis and report and a traffic analysis have also been performed. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. 3 Applications and approvals will be required for the water system construction from the City of Renton. A building permit and a Public Works site development permit will be required, all from the City of Renton. 11. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. The proposed project will convert an existing construction company equipment yard into an RV and boat storage facility. The property has a total area of 4.13 acres and is zoned CA. There are no sensitive areas on this property. The finished project will have 6 "buildings" or enclosures to • provide covered spaces. None of the buildings will be totally enclosed or climate controlled. There will be 180 total stalls,with 113 of them being covered. Access to the site will be from East Valley Road. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency,you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Location: The property address is 3330 East Valley Road. It is located on the east side of East Valley Road and west of the SR 167 freeway. It is located in Section 30,Township 23 N, Range 5 E., W.M. The property tax number is 302305-9090 Legal Description: That portion of the south half of the north half of the northwest quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 30,Township 23 north, Range 5 east, Willamette Meridian; in King County, Washington; Lying west of the westerly margin of Primary State Highway No. 5, as established by deed recorded under recording number 5346368. Except that portion thereof lying within the right of way for East Valley Highway. ie 4 B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (under line one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes mountainous, other. b. What is the steepest slope on the site(approximate percent slope)? The steepest slope on the site is approximately 5%, along the east side of the property, next to the freeway ditch. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Soils investigation discovered that much of the site is covered with a sandy fill material. The native soils are alluvium deposits that are generally found on the Valley floor. No agricultural or farmland. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. None. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. No substantial grading will be required on this site. Minimal grading will be necessary to shape the parking area for drainage flow prior to paving. p This grade adjustment will be less than 1 ft. There will be the typical cut for utilities and drainage detention pond. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. ' Yes, during rainy construction periods erosion could occur on un-protected disturbed surfaces, however the flatness of the site would make any runoff unlikely. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? The impervious surfaces for the proposed project will include the new asphalt paving that will cover the entire site, less the landscaped perimeter areas and the drainage facilities. The total impervious surface percentage is 87.7%. The total impervious surface amount is 157789 SF. 5 h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: 11 Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth include temporary and permanent erosion and sediment control measures as specified within the King County Surface Water Design Manual. Temporary erosion and sediment control measures include the I' installation of silt fence or hay bales, sedimentation pond, interceptor ditches, seeding or mulching exposed surfaces that are expected to remain as such for long periods of time, the application of water to exposed surfaces during dry seasons for dust control. Permanent erosion and sediment control measures include seeding exposed pervious areas for vegetation. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e. dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Dust (suspended particulates) and construction exhaust emissions to the air will occur during the temporary construction period. Automobile and other vehicle emissions will result from the completed project from the storage project users. No quantities are known. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? if so, generally describe. In general, there are no off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect the proposed development. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Contractors will be required to implement standard practices for dust 11, suppression such as the application of water to exposed surfaces, during construction. Standard exhaust filters will be on the construction equipment. 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. The freeway drainage ditch is along the east side of the property. No sensitive area waters are near the project. 6 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No sensitive area waters are in the area. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No surface water withdrawals or diversions are proposed. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. The site is not located within a 100-year flood plain. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. The proposal does not involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters. b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No groundwater will be withdrawn and no water will be discharged to groundwater as part of this project. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, If any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, chemicals, agricultural: etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. f' No septic systems. City of Renton provides complete sewer service. c. Water Run-off(including storm water): 1) Describe the source of run-off(including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. 'ii 7 Storm water run-off from all impervious surfaces will be collected in parking lot catch basins and directed into a piping system. The pipes will .11 direct the water to detention pond and then a grass-lined biofiltration swale. It will then be discharged to the freeway ditch at the northease . corner of the site. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Waste materials, such as road oils/contaminants, could enter the surface water if they are introduced into the system and are not removed by water quality facilities. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and run-off water impacts, if any: Best Management Practices proposed for erosion/sedimentation control during construction. Facilities for drainage control including detention ponds will be used. Facilities for water quality enhancement such as a biofiltration swale, catch basin sumps, and oil/water separators will be used. 4. Plants 11 a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on site: deciduous tree: No trees on the site. evergreen tree: No trees on the site. wet soil plants: None water plants: None other types of vegetation: Some landscaping shrubs around the existing office building and along the street frontage. b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? No vegetation will be removed. This site is used as a construction company storage yard and is completely cleared. The existing landscaping will be used in the new project if feasible. . c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site None are known. 4. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Much of the completed landscaping will be new shrubs and small trees. The only landscaped areas will be around the perimeter. 8 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: X Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: crows, robins X Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: squirrel, rodents, rabbits Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: Eastern gray squirrel and songbirds are typical of western Washington forests and residential neighborhoods. b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. No threatened or endangered species are known to be on or near the site. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. The Puget Sound area is part of the Pacific Flyway. Birds that inhabit the area vary seasonally due to migrations. However, the area is not part of a larger, permanently preserved migratory bird habitat. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None. 1, 6. Energy and Natural Resources i" What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. The energy needs for the project site will be met through services offered by Puget Sound Energy. Puget Sound Energy will be servicing the project site with electricity. These services will be used for lighting and electrical outlets. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: The contractors will comply with applicable City of Renton and other applicable local energy conservation requirements, such as the UBC. 7. Environmental Health 9 a. Are there any environmental health hazards,including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. 44 There are no known environmental heath hazards that would be of potential concern during construction of the proposed project. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. It is not anticipated that there will be any additional demand for special emergency services to serve the site as a result of the proposed project. Typical emergency services such as fire, police, medical may be required as is typical for any construction project. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: f Since there are no known environmental health hazards associated with the project, no measures are proposed. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project(for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example:traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. The operation of construction vehicles on-site during grading, sitework and the construction of the proposed structures will cause a short-term increase in daytime noise levels in the project vicinity. Construction would take place during normal hours for construction as permitted by the City. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Contractors will be required to confine on-site construction activities to daytime hours, in accordance with City ordinances. Equipment will be equipped with mufflers. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The existing site is a construction company storage yard. It was previously graded and is now covered with compacted gravel and a few concrete slabs. There is an existing small one-story office in the southwest corner. The adjacent uses are the Imperials Bingo to the north and South End Auto Wrecking scrap yard to the south. i 10 b. Has the site been used for agriculture? if so, describe. No. c. Describe any structures on the site. Existing single story,wood frame office building in the southwest corner. 11 d. Will any structures be demolished? If so,what? No. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? CA. Commercial Arterial. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Commercial g. If applicable,what is the current shoreline master program designation of the I�l site? The site is not within a Shoreline Environment. Has any part of the site been classified as an"environmentally sensitive"area?If so, specify. No. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Anticipated to have a single caretaker during business hours. This person may be part-time. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans,If any: The proposal is consistent with site zoning and Comprehensive Land Use Plan Designations for the property. Building setbacks are in accordance with the City of Renton requirements. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided,if any? Indicate whether high, middle or low-income housing. No new housing units will be provided. 11 b. Approximately how many units, if any,would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle or low-income housing. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Not applicable. 10. Aesthetics What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas:what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? The tallest height of the proposed storage area cover structure is 19'. These structures will be made of corrugated metal sides and roof. The existing office is and will remain wood siding. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? No views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: No such measures will be needed since no such impacts are expected. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? The proposed project will install building (roof) mounted spot lighting as necessary to provide security and safety for the entire project. The light and glare will slightly increase during the night as the result of the proposed project. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? None that we are aware of. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Existing off-site sources of light and glare in the project vicinity would be from streetlights and motor vehicles operating on adjacent roadways. These sources or light and glare are not considered to significantly affect the proposed project. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light or glare impacts,if any: Any flood lights that are installed will be low-glare, directed down. 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? it 12 None. Not applicable. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None is proposed. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. There are no known places or objects listed for, national, state or local preservation registers within or near the project. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. There are no known landmarks or evidence of historic; archaeological; scientific; or cultural importance located on or near the site. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None proposed. !+ 14. Transportation I' a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed rl access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The proposed site plan shows access from East Valley Road. All internal traffic will use 30' wide driveway aisles. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? The site and its immediate surroundings are not served by public transit. The nearest public transit site is approx. '/2 mile to the southeast. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? The completed project will provide 180 parking spaces for large vehicles, boats and RV's. No existing parking spaces will be eliminates. The existing office parking spaces will remain. i 13 d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). The frontage road, East Valley Road, is fully improved and will not need any new improvements. No internal roads are proposed. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of)water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Not known. A traffic study is being prepared and will estimate the traffic generation for this site. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Traffic mitigation fee will be paid as required by the City. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Possible need for fire protection if one of the stored vehicles, or buildings caught fire. No other services will be needed. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. The required impact fees will be paid. The finished storage facilities will added to the tax base to provide tax support for the public services. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Proposed utilities for the project include the extension of water, and electricity within the facility. Sewer and water: City of Renton. Telephone: Qwest Electricity: Puget Sound Energy li 14 C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: i Date Submitted: it I'. JUSTIFICATION FOR APPROVAL ��c lfAvih. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT JV aFAFMoNwiHe ;, N2iisECE ? A. Comprehensive Plan and Zoning: $. The comprehensive plan shows this property as having the Employment Area Valley land use designation. Within this designation, the property is zoned Commercial Arterial. The City Council mapped the Commercial Arterial zoning in the Valley in order to provide opportunities for property owners to re-invest and upgrade the properties bordering the freeway. The concept at that time was to discontinue industrial uses in this area and encourage more intensive commercial uses, which could take advantage of freeway visibility and access. Title IV, Chapter 2 Land Use Districts defines the purpose of the Commercial Arterial zones as "to provide a suitable environment for commercial development. The CA zone provides for a wide variety of retail sales and for personal/professional services primarily oriented to automobile traffic along designated major arterial streets". The proposed use meets the intent of the code by providing a commercial enterprise that benefits from the proximity to the SR 167 freeway and the East Valley Road. The proposed vehicle and boat storage yard is a good transition between the existing South End Wrecking "salvage" yard immediately to the south and the Imperials Bingo hall immediately to the north. A retail "strip" center would not flourish in this location due to the adjacent uses and the low traffic volume. This facility will provide a commercial venture that is suited to the specific location. B. Community Need: Many new subdivisions that are being constructed within the City now are required to have a homeowners association. This is a common by- product of almost every new residential development. A requirement of the homeowners association is the establishment of codes, covenants and restrictions (CCR's). Within most of these "rules" are provisions that boats, RV's and other ancillary vehicles cannot be permanently stored on the lot. This forces many residents to seek nearby, off-site storage accommodations for their boats, RVs, etc. Generally, the most common pV provider of these storage spaces are within self-storage complexes. However, if there is a waiting list for the vehicle storage spaces, those with a storage unit will get preference. This forces many people to rent a storage unit just to get a vehicle storage space. The proposed project will provide only the vehicle storage spaces. This will provide a supply of the vehicle storage spaces that are becoming more in demand. The facility will be secured with perimeter fencing and will provide fire protection measures such as sprinkler systems within the enclosures, inside fire hydrants and fire lanes. Even the covered vehicle spaces will provide an amenity not found in many existing storage yards. The proposed facility will allow the future patrons to pay only for what is needed and will also provide the additional security of the fenced yard with fire protection. The location of the site is ideal for the vehicle storage. It is near a freeway ramp and the East Valley Highway is a wide, paved road with very little traffic volume. The trailers and RV's can access this location without having to navigate through many intersections and traffic. ,. C. Effect on Adjacent Properties: There are two adjacent properties. The Imperials Bingo Hall is adjacent to the north. This facility is used on an infrequent basis. There is a large parking lot next to the subject property line. The proposed vehicle storage yard should have no effect on the use and desirability of the bingo operation. The property to the south is the South End Auto Wrecking yard. Needless to say, the proposed project will not detract from this use. The storage yard will be an improvement to the construction yard that is existing at the site. The heavy equipment and construction materials were not aesthetically pleasing and the construction trucks were noticeable as they passed. The proposed storage complex will be an improvement. 1II CONSTRUCTION MITIGATION DESCRIPTION The proposed construction for this project will occur in two phases. The sitework that involves the drainage, paving and water main will be completed under a paving permit for the existing construction yard. The construction of the buildings will be constructed under a separate building permit issued after the C.U.P. is approved. I� begin sitework construction: June, 2002 complete sitework: July, 2002 begin building construction: August, 2002 complete building construction: September, 2002 The hours of construction will be established by the City. Typically these hours are 7:00 AM to 6:00 PM on weekdays. Weekend work may be allowed if requested and approved by the City. The construction transportation route will typically be along East Valley Road from the south. Dust control will be practiced using watering of the ground surface as necessary. Other transportation impacts will be mitigated by using flaggers when work is being performed within the right- of-way. A traffic control plan will be submitted to the City. A rock pad construction access will be used to assist in keeping the mud off the City street. The contractor will use a street sweeper when necessary to clean the City street. 1) 1/c rypMFNT ,/ OFAFAiTpNNiNG RECE e0 ♦ • DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON JUN 1 7.2002 C�op��.�o RECEIVED C MEMORANDUM /610N DATE: TWA/ l (,, ?-9D TO: Construction Services, Fire Prevention, Plan Review, EDNSP, Project Planner FROM: Neil Watts, Development Services Division Director SUBJECT: New Preliminary Application: KOHL, RV 4' SOS S1Q 't iE PA-GIL-17` LOCATION: 3030 "SST 'JA-tA f fit v'I PREAPP NO. O L-0 1 ' A meeting with the applicant has been scheduled for / 00 , Thursday, A v6 U ST , in one of the 6th floor conference rooms (new City Hall). If this meeting is scheduled at 10:00 AM, the MEETING MUST BE CONCLUDED PRIOR TO 11:00 AM to allow time to prepare for the 11:00 AM meeting. Please review the attached project plans prior to the scheduled meeting with the applicant. You will not need to do a thorough "permit level" review at this time. Note only major issues that must be resolved prior to formal land use and/or building permit application submittal. Please submit your written comments to L at least two (2) days before the meeting. Thank you. WJ a atit ( OrJeve •, f ('01 c� f1�� ✓� lc) r Sew , Co 17, C 1997 c • {(bly u _ H:\Division.s\Develop.ser\Dev&Plan.ing\Template\Preapp2 Revised 9/00 • ti 0 G . " ® , CITY OF RENTON FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU N/A/TO MEMORANDUM DATE: July 18, 2001 TO: Lesley Nishihira, Planner FROM: Jim Gray, Assistant Fire Marshal 9e SUBJECT: Kohl RV & Boat Storage, 3330 East Valley Rd Fire Department Comments: 1. The preliminary fire flow is 4250 GPM, one hydrant is required within 150 feet of the structure and four additional hydrants are required within 300 feet of the structure. 2. A fire mitigation fee of$32,190.08 is required based on $.52 per 1,1 square foot of the new building square footage. 3. Separate plans and permits are required for the installation of dry sprinkler system for both buildings and fire alarm sprinkler monitoring equipment. 4. Fire Department access roadways are required to within 150 feet of all portions of the building exterior. Roadways are a minimum 20 in width with a turning radius of 45 foot outside and 25 foot inside. The plan as submitted does not comply with this requirement. 5. All internal circulation roadways shall be clearly marked as Fire . Lanes. A secondary emergency access is required. 2 ( t.,cAtr ,nnuk . 6. Provide a list of the flammable, combustible liquids and any hazardous chemical to be used or stored on site. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. � y 15 Is' 4z CD ti\ic4) 1,1- V\ ‘t • • August 2, 2001 Page 2 Street Improvements: The site has street improvements, curbs, gutters, sidewalk, street paving and street lights in place. New proposed driveway will be in accordance with current codes/standards. Traffic mitigation fees of $75/trip will be required. General: Construction permit fees will be required for construction of water mains, sewer, storm drainage system and street improvements. The cost of permits are as follows: The first $100,000 is at 5% of the cost of the construction, the second from $100,000 to $200,000 is at 4% of the cost and the third all the amount over $200,000 is at 3% of the cost. Half of the fee must be paid upon application for building and off/on site utility and street improvement construction review. The remainder shall be paid when the permits are issued. 1 d I'. �I' . 1 Kohl RV& Boat Storage Facility Pia-.,pplication Meeting File No.01-075 f2ve,c). f 4y\ G�. CN1 August 2,2001 �'�— Page 2 of 2 The project would construct metal canopies around the perimeter of the site that would include metal backings. Also proposed is the installation of a wrought iron fence to be used in combination with the existing landscaping along the site's street frontage. The metal structures would appear to comply with the screening requirements. However, verification of adequate landscaping to accomplish effective screening would be necessary along the site's street frontage. In addition, all landscaped areas must be a minimum width of 5 feet and must include underground sprinkler systems. At the time of formal application submittal, a detailed landscape plan indicating the location, sizes, and types of the proposed plantings will be required. Pedestrian Connection — All development in the CA zone is required to provide a direct and clear pedestrian connection from sidewalks to building entrances. The formal application will need to indicate the location, width, and materials for the required pedestrian walkway on the project site plan. Parking — The parking regulations require a specific number of off-street parking stalls based on the amount of square footage dedicated to specific uses. For this project the following ratios would be applicable: • 1 space for every 2,000 square feet of area dedicated to storage use, and • A minimum of 3 to a maximum of 4.5 spaces for every 1,000 square feet of office space. The formal application submittal would need to include a detailed parking analysis in order to staff to verify the proposal provides the appropriate number of spaces for employees and visitors to the site. Signaoe — The City Sign Regulations permit wall signs at a maximum size equivalent to 20% of building façade it is applied to. In addition, one of the free standing sign (pole, monument, roof, or projecting) is permitted per street frontage. The size of the free standing sign is not to exceed a total of 300 square feet in area, including all faces (e.g., 150 square feet per face for a two-faced sign). Free standing signs are limited to a maximum height of 40 feet and must comply with the required setbacks of the zone. A separate sign permit is required for any proposed signage. Permit Requirements: The proposal would require Environmental (SEPA) Review and Administrative Site Plan Approval. The review process would be completed in an estimated .!.- frame of 6 to 8 weeks once a complete application is accepted. The application fee would be 41,500, $0.34 per mailing label required for notification to all property owners within 300 feet of the si e. "lease refer to the attached application package for a complete list of the submittal requirements. -c)kg,\,R ! In addition to the required land use permits, separate utility construction, building, and sign permits would be required. The review of these permits may occur concurrently with the review of the land use sty ()'1 V permits, but can not be issued prior to the completion of any required appeal periods. R Before the land use application may begin the review process, any applicable ordinances amending the code must be in effect and have completed all necessary appeal periods. Fees: In addition to the applicable building, construction, and sign permit fees, the following mitigation fees would be required prior to the issuance of building permits: • A Transportation Mitigation Fee based on $75 per each new average daily trip attributable to the project; and • A Fire Mitigation Fee based on $0.52 per square foot of new construction. A handout listing all of the Citys Development related fees in attached for your review. cc: Jennifer Henning - �j \Q* Y'\O,> t Pre01-075\ CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: August 2, 2001 TO: Lesley Nishihira Az FROM: Paul Lumbert SUBJECT: Kohl RV & Boat Storage Facility Preliminary Application Note on Preliminary Review Comments Contained In This Report: The following comments on development and permitting issues are based upon the pre-application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision makers (e.g., Hearing Examiner, Board of Adjustment, Board of Public Works and City Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on programmatic, site planning and other design changes made by the applicant. Wastewater (Sanitary Sewer): The site is served by an 8" main, located in East Valley Road. proposedp . Water: The site is served by an existing 12" main, located in East Valley Road. New water main, fire hydrants or fire control system must meet fire flow and current fire codes/regulations per Renton Fire Department. New meter for irrigation service will be required and must meet current U.P.C. codes/standards. Surface Water (Storm Drainage): The drainage plan and temporary erosion/sedimentation control plans shall be in accordance with the 1990 K.C.S.W.D.M., per City of Renton. Surface water (SDC) fees of $0.183/sq. ft. of new impervious surface added to the site will be required. CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works MEMORANDUM 11 DATE: August 2, 2001 TO: Pre-Application File No. 01-075 FROM: Lesley Nishihira, Senior Planner, x7270 SUBJECT: Kohl RV & Boat Storage Facility General: We have completed a preliminary review of the pre-application for the above-referenced development proposal. The following comments on development and permitting issues are based on the pre-application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant and the codes in effect on the date of review. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision-makers (e.g., Hearing Examiner, Zoning Administrator, Board of Adjustment, Board of Public Works, and City Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by City staff or made by the applicant. The applicant is encouraged to review all applicable sections of the Renton Municipal Code. The Development Regulations are available for purchase for $50, plus tax, from the Finance Division on the first floor of City Hall. Project Proposal: The subject property is addressed as 3330 East Valley Road, located north of SW 34th Street on the east side of East Valley Highway. State Route 167 also borders the site on the east side. The proposal is to construct 184 stalls intended for the long-term storage of recreational vehicles and boats. Improvements to the site include asphalt paving, striping, landscaping, and utility connections. Covered structures are also proposed and would consist of a 14-foot tall metal posts and frame, as well as a metal back for those located along the perimeter of the site. Zoning: The subject site is zoned Commercial Arterial (CA) on the City's Zoning Map. The site is also designated Employment Area — Valley (EAV) on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. Currently, outside storage of vehicles (large or small) is not permitted within the CA zoning designation. However, as indicated by Strategic Planning staff, a code amendment to establish the proposed use as a permitted use in the CA zone is currently under review. The pending code amendment must be completed prior to the submission of a formal land use application. Development Standards: The proposal would be required to comply with all applicable development standards of the CA zone and the parking regulations as explained below: Lot Coverage -The CA zone allows building coverage at a maximum of 65% of the lot area for projects not providing structured parking. Buildings containing structured parking are permitted to cover 75% of the lot area. The proposal would result in building lot coverage of approximately 38% (estimated 68,461 combined square feet of building footprint over the 179,902 square foot/4.13-acre site). Setbacks — The CA zone requires a minimum landscaped setback of 10 feet from all street and freeway frontages. No rear or side yard setbacks are required unless abutting property designated with residential zoning. No other setbacks are required in the zone unless abutting residential zoned property. The proposed structures appear to maintain the required setbacks from all property lines. Height—The site plan submitted indicates proposed building heights of 14 feet for the metal canopies. This is within the CA zone's maximum permitted height of 50 feet. Landscaping/Screening— In addition to the landscaped setback requirements along the site's west and east property lines, an additional 2% of the site area must be dedicated to natural landscaping. Outdoor storage areas must be screened from adjacent or abutting properties and public rights-of-way. This requirement would apply to the entire site. Christopher Brown 0 Associates " 9688 Rainier Ave. S. Seattle, WA 98118-5981 (206) 722-1910 Fax (206) 722-1909.} R/V & Boat Storage Facility 0 3330 East Valley Road C noc�,1 ✓6A, F74ONN/NG, 442 Renton �C&i Fo Traffic Impact Analysis King County k +' j72141,1, ', r June 25, 2002 I 1 « , a,s;i..1,. s• 4. 0 . v.y. rexptFes 9 ' 1 Traffic Engineers 5 Transportation Planners R/V & Boat Storage Facility Renton Traffic Impact Analysis Table of Contents Introduction 1. Location 1. Traffic Characteristics 3. Trip Generation 3. Horizon Year 5. Street System 5. Traffic Distribution 7. Horizon Year Volumes with Project 7. Annualized Horizon Year Forecast 7. Mitigation Fees 10. Capacity Analysis 11. Adverse Consequences and Mitigating Measures 12. l' Conclusions 12. List of Figures 1. Vicinity Map 2. 2. Current P.M. Peak Hour Volumes & AWDT 4. 3. 2004 P.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes without Project 6. 4. Traffic Assignment 8. 5. 2004 P.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes with Project 9. List of Tables I Gross New Trip Generation 5. II Net New Trip Generation 5. III Levels of Service 11. Appendix P.M. Peak Hour Field Count, E. Valley Road/SW 34th Street Levels of Service Christopher brown CAS Associates 9688 Rainier Ave. S. Seattle, WA 98118-5981 (206) 722-1910 Fax (206) 722-1909 ' 1 RN & Boat Storage Facility 3330 East Valley Road Renton Traffic Impact Analysis Introduction At the present time the Kohl Excavating Company uses the above addressed site for business related office functions and for equipment storage. The site has an area of some 179,793 square feet and is zoned for CA uses. It is proposed to convert the site from an open gravel surfaced equipment storage yard into a formal mini-storage yard with particular emphasis on R/V and boat storage. For these purposes new sheds and/or open carports will be constructed to provide all-weather storage and, in addition, open storage for taller vehicles and boats on trailers. Weather protected storage units will total 111 with an additional 64 stalls being set aside for the open storage units. In essence, the storage facility will provide space for a total of 175 R/V's and/or boats with trailers. The existing 1,600-gsf-office building is to remain and will continue to be used for office purposes. Site access will also remain, as presently existing, except secure gates with tenant access locks will be incorporated. While the type of commercial activity remains essentially the same a Conditional Use Permit is being sought. This traffic study is being provided as a component of the application for the Conditional Use Permit. Location The site is located on the east side of the East Valley Road— a modern 3-lane arterial street with overhead illumination, curbs, gutters and sidewalks - about a block to the north of the intersection with SW 34th Street. It is between the existing Imperial Bingo hall and South End Auto. South End Auto includes an automobile junkyard and a radiator repair shop with other auto related repair/parts businesses. On the west side of the road, across from the site, is the Burlington Northern Industrial Park that includes warehousing and light manufacturing facilities. The site location is shown on the Vicinity Map, Figure 1. Christopher brown f?S Associates 9688 rainier Ave. 6. -1- 6eattle, WA 98118-5981 (206) 722-1910 Fax (206) 722-1909 .--. .... S 132ND ST 444 Pal 2ND i.., s TriLiam g.'"ST ..,.•' . --S . ITsn°:,2 re,_,tf p-o__—RS_m.T-4"-`4...? !--"'-S' -Ai''-•R s7''•E'7HN-':S T-TO-O N.Is.`,Nt,•• r.I,Ist,S.L rr :L - S 4c B .t Il—cI,usA.,A,T,N.44-,,w,,','„ar,-.rI.'M v'A''‘,-)t s..4,Z...•--'c''''1 ".L•I BERT Y4 7 '1/7 .„Fi',,..9'I4 v>1-44-' N ()VLIOMNT .444 li•.`'.4*-: LANGSre 9'-"L4r-4,r0N- --'1'.-- : --. '3 «- 2 D ST/ ' ,,, cEDAR ..„: t j 4,4:? CEMETERY SE 2ND,,PL 4, •or a.. ,_.•a e N- Pt A, ;..sr yip iq''t .„ MO • ' ,,, '... ...- .% ci: ii.' •.' ,-,UAW°. ' '"' .< 4--m-e- ...,Os ''-- .1'S"'"' •••• FS' . . ---RIVER -PARK •••• ' Pum• 4."------ 7.- 4 •-•...0 :-... ,..,. -‹ wooer' ,I / ':—.72.!:.---70.• ite 5044 <,E.Ar-=-2---P -4 3, • 7%7'--••'>'`';'; -;,,S1-!._44: . . V ---,if!"1"4"7"- , S 3RD 14. c":' iv ST "'". ' - 4-„.x..,.-- ;.. ----• °''''i '' 1.•;3".'PH:4: ;fr,'". ,,AS;-.am. — ,is --J PIAZZA 00 ", _' ,e..,. . ST \ qz 3 SU ,4" •'9,-,--2,, -`4TH o''''ST '<, ii: .-§ sm., 4,---:....,-44„'''t.FRED '3,,,r‘.10 S " ;::-''•I''' TOWNS . Ars rt54 -°TN cT '' s 1.--' 0'.MEYER 'P' laiI4 3, ,,,".eit S P41'.1. a._,! jat-g t:•-A,. • ..• c,,,,,,, L.. .i,,,, ,,„.1.,, < • ,„..,,,,,,, ,, ,___.... .... ,,..„... ..„.: RE„nw.mai Oil,-ir ..,.:,..... :S w 5TH ST • ' ' . ,‘,0 #p • :..: -I ,s sill l'r , ig, ,..„..--",CENTER _:: ----E: .2. -,, , )„ L . s/ /-' ,• .saue47 .-1 '',,5 i = '.'' .1,- .i> ! •.., 4-RR '------.6.i.-- • . z....;...c ,,._S 6TH ST si, 11211•17 i:S„,5,:„,6%ST 1.444,1", 6::' --'''''.' 6THS"Cil ;...0 '''' j'../ 4... „., t ) sw / rrif i\ eirif CT i---1---1- ..c.„,,, .2 1 '.=a ; PAR" •i 4. sk , 7. ' g • .'12°3 .i...-1\.,s4rt \ 1 .- a!F. tii '. ''-- I • ' Z., in 7e .. / RICEIR ,r E 'IC) --' W02,411- h §, g' 1 z g. -i ri ir., . , •i.,,—ARNOLD ...c t - ---1---7---- - •.0-4' 6c10 ,,er"b' --P-'- . 91 VILLAGE IOTIt W' i PARK I -I r,s,f \,,,N '....-------- * --sri 1\ci• g. 43.:94. _---- el C 6 S RENTON VILLAGE • . - 30‘)• 121 '- Hamar PL / -'' \ .1..". n\i "." I/Lit: ........2.--- -----°'' ..e. ----- :-: IS\4_-••------c:1 a,_13.1_1_4 .... /2 ;r,.... 73 .. p 84 • .:Pe l' - 7.4 ,11•1•1•ms., ''' --1. wwww .:,.....„, ,,,, ,....2,, ,x: -- ----------. m • i \1 prig" \ i7zzar...Az l'' lispi cr, trc, . i,.z 4. ••• GAT1 i va isrw:i gs. sr L SW . ii." N f sw • ST . !T 40, ) 20 11, r4 1 I ?,-, '' S 16TH ST - ''. 4,,..--/ s\J` S ". \ Z/ . \ SE,.51611__L•Lft.07 r- •v • ,' ,,r1 <IP''", r• '.. , tS[117111 .-a : —...a ‘,.(yl.•..i\ t ng. ,r 4 -SW19TST i\ tos 1:Y... 1,Z7 4,... I N.FS S 19TN 1 sr kir • .,,,,,„, 11 1 er.;:yok `T * -.,w1.94, sT t 00 14 •Z.mtsr ...c ^-,,, 1 puGET ,p,.....„ .#49/4.9,:?;qx7 4,s-e., N - 1 1 cc; i 4. ,cc = [REEK ,•,,, ti i.be SW.'...."2IST ST ,,, urnAws i',7,,.lsj I ..„ g S 2710-171.7 Ul SW 23RD sT S 23RD ' " N' ST -4'5-.F.T7u gis „F„21ST 2,"' .:'/..j.. I !, SE 21ST ST . .4 e , . HID I • .; VI • . . >* \ I 162ND re' .1i ST ; L,_, 2.•,:t IVAt VIA S • I,. ._-__...... -J ' ,. , 1 • .a la '- - -ri'll ,* , .INN,.-c.'s, ', I IrE 1 -• , L44 , •-• -. ti)• •or ›. Si 1.,,.. , -, -.3,,,,,,s e. ,.... i . .g. SE 164TH - ST ..• SW I •27TH ST•lio ,Ver, ' .. 5 27TH ST ku,i09C: ST 47c. tr•=-CC e,,,.---- ',7,<. ,: ,-- vl • 12 ...,1.- s 2Erni-•,, T::, ty,!8 SE 165TH I S s 2rm --r. S 4.1,-- tiso a , 51 If s1...,i - iumunosis * .2": i .,"211711 ..1`•,_ _,...--..- •, a., ,. -., .? Ar A.:.47 ,,,,,u RENTON t,..„ WETLANDS -Tt. 4' '.--- A N 4 CI L, ,.4 !' -n t .e. '2.. 1,..?--- •,-,\ osE 166Th SET 1 29T14'ST •C .c .4 l'irc w 29TH ST = g ..., all . SW • 1 - i-‹ ?4 .col A. • :.' \W-"cr ''..Tr) !"-: ,, - -. SE II S..31ST ST MrCT -= •C "c •--,la-t - , V , : ST 1\\.,,,\ \.,•" , rs, 3111) SIII33RD ST 1 11 , pc 4'PL ..‘--3apt g! = .. "I. SE 1 SE 169TH 1_17s0ETH16s9illi P.I.. .... .. sT .:V.. ,__.._I...c ''. .- = .- sE 170TH < , "J ilk. .40 1 III . - - = •. T —ea Tr ' :•-• ,:., CO ,--, -",=E.SW mr = \i 34TH. ST 1,...,„„,..„ g - - N. E ST o .--. - 1- - ko I 34 Th.". ST S gliSS:11..2,4. '- s., .--. 172ND ST ' ...c S ,-,E 172ND ST '. SE1TNOS' ... 're'''S. ' • RENTON I 0`" caUX t tn .. ' ST& ck.4' .t,-. W , 1 = it i.36n, ,. g."! , •••,:' SE 173RD ST ani 138114 1617EMIS -1 , 37TH ST S tt<St MTH ST '‘.- ' ...,y7/11 sr .-.T ,.,1 Rs -iiiiii- -LI " :!"1.4 '(,, ; FS h SE 175TH - 1 gi SW 35TH ST wfTLANDS rcr .314 •si s ,. '" Li: r",f"' SE-t• e• 176TH sT , 11 SW la I a" 1 41ST ST , s.‘ ' c0 --- •-• - • . : :%,'' ' •-: ;.--, -.-- _:".•• s 17mi ST.":"..• E(..1 __a , .1. ..f. Fi 1 1,11 P t •••. ..P, (= •••;E S 2 Z .:._'• = . 'I ' -- Pt i! ,I I• FIGURE 1 i Vicinity Map (- 1 Christopher brown ,g5 Associates 9688 1 S.2ainier Ave. Page 2 \ „ _ // 8eattle, WA 98118-5981 (206) 722-1910 Fax (206) 722-1909 l' Traffic Characteristics Current peak hour traffic volume data was gathered in the field in early June under clear, sunny and dry weather conditions. No adverse elements existed to skew the data. Current traffic volume data is shown on Figure 2. The data of Figure 2 also shows the current p.m. peak hour traffic volumes now found at the existing Kohl Excavating Company site. For clarity, and since the volumes are so small, they are assumed to be at only one driveway although there are two driveways present, one for the storage yard and one for the office. Trip Generation Trip generation for a site that is exclusively scheduled for R/V and boat storage was obtained in the field at the boat storage yard at the north end of the Shilshole Bay Marina operated by the Port of Seattle and also with weekday p.m. peak hour observations at the Covington Mini-storage that also has (open) RV storage on-site. On Tuesday, June 6, 2002 at the Shilshole Bay Marina no vehicles entered or left the dry storage yard where boats on trailers are stored. There are 74 boats on trailers stored in this yard that is proximate to the boat-launching ramp. However, small sailing dinghies are also stored on the floating docks to the west of this dry storage yard. There are 98 sailing dinghies stored on these floats. In summary, the Shilshole Bay Marina has storage for(98+74) 172 boats. This is considered a worst-case comparison since these are all very close to the water and have exceptionally easy access to Puget Sound. Over the p.m. peak hour of the street on June 6th a total of fifteen (15) vehicles entered or left the Shilshole Bay Marina with persons that were observed using (launching) the sailing dinghies on the floating dock. With a vehicular demand of 15 for the 172 boats that are stored at the marina, of particular interest on a sunny summer day as distinct to a stormy, wet, winter day, the average weekday peak hour demand for stored boats was, accordingly, 8.7 percent. Continuing, over the p.m. peak hour of a sunny Wednesday afternoon (June 5, 2002) there were no RV vehicles observed entering or leaving the Covington Mini-storage site. The average weekday p.m. peak hour demand for R/V usage was zero (0%) percent. Note that it is likely weekend and Friday R/V demand may be higher over the peak hour of the street but, as a traffic impact study, only the average weekday is considered and this limits observations to Tuesdays, Wednesdays and Thursdays. Chri&topher brown CS Awociates 9688 12ainier Ave. S. -3- Seattle, WA 98118-5981 (206) 722-1910 Fax (206) 722-1902 • 0 b o Burlington 3� Northern Industrial Imperials Bingo Dark 1� N D Northern Driveway to site nk is gated and not shown. Site Access CIS d � M � South End Auto, north driveway N rri I South End Auto, south driveway SW 34th Street Cj 140 \` FIGURE 2 Current P.M. Peak Hour Volumes & AWDT Christopher [gown 0 A59ociaLe8 -4- 9688 Qaiilier Ave. S. beattle, WA 98118-5981 (206) 722-1910 Fax (206) 722-1909 As a closing comment: with the above field data being gathered under summer-like conditions, as distinct from spring, fall or winter where adverse weather may prevail that would thus impact travel demands for these kinds of recreational uses, the foregoing observations for trip generation purposes must be considered the worst case. For the 175 R/V's and/or boats with trailers to be stored on the site, assuming 100 percent occupancy, the worst-case trip generation with a maximum use rate of 8.7 percent is derived, below. TABLE I Gross New Trip Generation P.M. Inbound 5 vehicles/hour P.M. Outbound 10 vehicles/hour Since there were 4 outbound vehicles and one inbound vehicle already observed at the site, as shown on Figure 2, the net new trip generation from Table I is then extracted. TABLE II Net New Trip Generation P.M. Inbound 4 vehicles/hour P.M. Outbound 6 vehicles/hour Horizon Year The project will be developed in a single phase and should be completed within one year, perhaps even by the end of 2002. Assuming about two years for leasing all spaces the horizon year, for the purposes of this study, is taken at 2004. The horizon year traffic volumes without the project are shown on Figure 3. These assume a growth rate of 2.4 percent per year based on WSDOT (ADC) count station on SR 167 at MP 23.7. Street System The immediate fronting arterial street serving the site is the East Valley Road. As noted earlier this is a 3-lane facility with a center 2-way, left turn lane. 1 :)111111 Christopher brown Cn Associates -5- 9688 12ainier Ave. 8. \\ Seattle, WA 98118-5981 (206) 722 1910 Fax (206) 722-1909' CO 0 Burlington 7 42,, Northern Industrial Park \-0 �l Imperials Bingo l • Northern Driveway to site RIis gated and not shown. A Site Access LI 20 Mr 5 I �3 y South End Auto, north drivewc:.y • • t C South End Auto, south driveway kSir4 3 1)SW 34th Street 6 NI ?C'.. \\ k.. 43( FIGURE 3 Year 2004 P.M. Peak Hour Volumes Without Development (4 Chri8topher brown CS Amociate8 9688 Iainier Ave. S. -6- Seattle, WA 98118-5981 (206) 722-1910 Fax (206) 722-1909__,1 Close by the nearest intersection is at SW 34th Street. This is a STOP sign controlled intersection therefore allowing through traffic on East Valley Road. Indeed, all minor streets entering the East valley Road are STOP sign controlled. The project will have three access points—one serving the office building and one that will be gated and serve the tenants. A smaller manually opened gated entrance, unlike the main access that is mechanical opened, will be located on the northwest corner of the property. Not being mechanically opened it is not expected to be well used. It is merely a supplemental access that can serve for emergency purposes. At the project site there are no entering sight distance (ESD) issues. Trip Distribution The net new traffic generated by this R/V and boat storage site as shown in Table II will be distributed onto the adjacent arterial street system primarily to the north and the south via the East Valley Road. The traffic distribution and assignment of site-generated traffic is based on the Analogy Method and is established by referencing the current directional travel demand at both the existing site and the nearby adjacent driveways. This method is described in detail in Transportation and Land Development, Vergil G. Stover and Frank J. Koepke, 1988, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). The assignment of traffic based on this trip distribution is shown on Figure 4. Horizon Year Volumes with Project The 2004 traffic forecast with the project completed and assumed to be fully occupied is shown on Figure 5. The data of this figure combines the 2004 forecast of Figure 3 with the peak hour data shown on Figure 4. Annualized Horizon Year Forecast From a traffic study done for the Mini-Shamrock Corporation attendant to their 403-unit facility at 10528 SE 256th Street, Kent, the following trip parameters may be of interest. Christopher brown 0A& ociate8 9688 Rainier Ave. S. -7- Seattle, WA 98118-5981 (206) 722-1910 Fax (206) 722-1909 Burlington / Northern y Industrial Imperials Bingo Park O Nr:3 o D Northern Driveway to site I is gated and not shown. 1` 2 C7 2 A Site Access 2 1 South End Auto, north driveway N r01 0 1 I, I South End Auto, south driveway ki 0 SW 34th Street Qe_:/o 1 • o 0 FIGURE 4 Traffic Assignment Chrietoplier brown 0 Amociate8 _g_ 9688 Rainier Ave. &. (Seattle, WA 98118-5981 / (206) 722-1910 Fax (206) 722-1909 (Q i 0 Burlington /�j� t.ly Northern Industrial \-‘- ) II•1 Imperials Bingo Park *9 4. (--, M Northern Driveway to site Iis gated and not shown. is] A Site Access p (:)( iv I South End Auto, north driveway t 1.-\ Kly I South End Auto, south driveway k.(Is 3 ) c ) SW 34th Street 10 1,.1 P.71 I k NY ik �J FIGURE 5 Year 2004 P.M. Peak Hour Volumes With Development Christopher brown CS Associates -9- 9688 Qainier Ave. 6. 6eattIe, WA 98118-5981 c (206) 722-1910 Fax (206) 722-1909 j These were derived from daily reports extracted from their computer system. • Permanent staff on site. 1, typical • Leased space average occupancy rate. 84.6 % • Mechanical gate operations. Key Pad • Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 45 trips/day based on a 14 day count • ADT Rate 0.11 daily trips/leased unit • Average p.m. peak volume (DHV*) 5.7 trips/hour based on a 14 day count • DHV Rate 0.01 peak hour trips/leased unit * DHV—Design Hourly Volume, typically the p.m. peak hour For the proposed R/V and boat storage facility the annualized average daily traffic is more likely to be in the order of: 0.11 daily trips/leased unit X 175 stalls = 19 trips per average weekday Similarly, based on the above annualized data, the average weekday p.m. peak hour will be in the order of 0.01 peak hour trips/leased unit X 175 stalls = 2 p.m. peak hour trips Table II on page 5 described the typical p.m. peak hour traffic volume estimates based on the Shilshole Bay Marina dry storage yard and dinghy floats as having 4 vehicles per hour inbound and 6 vehicles per hour outbound. The harbormaster at the Des Moines Marina advised that typically, when the weather is bad, they have few tenants using their launch facilities. While all their dry storage units are 10X25 and have individual locked doors for security, boats are launched from their dockside crane and sling. He indicated that little if any activity takes place when foul weather is in the offing, especially in late fall, winter, and spring. Fishing is seasonal for the hardy souls who engage in this sport. Thus, the data from the Mini-Shamrock Corporation facility in Kent provides the most appropriate data for traffic mitigation fee estimates in that they are annualized over a year and are not based on only a fine, sunny, summer day. Mitigation Fees The typical traffic mitigation fees in the City of Renton are $75 per new or added ADT. Moreover, from the above there are an estimated 19 annualized average daily trips. Christopher brown Cn Associates 9688 rainier Ave. 6. -10- &cattle, WA 98118-5981 (206) 722-1910 Fax (206) 722-1909 These 19 new ADT's are for the new site when it is developed as an R/V park and boat storage yard. Indeed, it is based on an assumed 100 percent occupancy rate. More likely than not, as with the Mini-Shamrock Corporation facility in Kent, the occupancy rate will be in the order of 84.6 percent so that the actual annualized ADT will be (19 X 0.846) sixteen (16) trips per day. However, the existing Kohl Excavating site has 5 p.m. peak hour trips, as shown on Figure 2, and an estimated ADT of 36 trips per day, based on the ratio of p.m. trips to ADT for Land Use Code 110,Light Manufacturing. Clearly, the conversion of an on-going active commercial site into a more passive site devoted to only recreational vehicle or boat storage uses will have fewer average weekday trips. As a consequence, the proposed project is in essence a mitigation measure. It will reduce the ADT from about 36 trips per day to 16 trips per day. In turn, the reduction in ADT implies that it is not subject to traffic mitigation fees since the traffic demands are les than produced by the current site. Capacity Analysis Capacity analysis is in accordance with the 2001 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM). The analysis was accomplished using the 2001 HCM software produced by the McTrans Center at the University of Florida. The software is used under license to Christopher Brown, P.E. The results of the analysis are noted on below in Table III. When reviewing the following LOS summaries, note that the computer input and results • are included in the Appendix. The appendix computations for the STOP controlled intersections and driveways show only the worst case LOS. TABLE III Levels of Service Intersection 2002 2004 2004 Current Without With Use New Use New Use East Valley Road/SW 34th Street C C C 17.2 sec. 17.9 sec. 18.0 sec. East Valley Road/Site Access B B B 13.4 sec. 13.7sec. 15.0sec. Christopher brown fg5 Associates 9688 Rainier Ave. S. -11- Seattle, WA 98118-5981 (206) T22-1910 Fax (206) 722-1909_; Adverse Consequences and Mitigation Measures This project will not induce any adverse traffic impacts. In fact, the new site usage converts an active site into a passive site with resulting fewer average daily trips. Even using the highest possible peak hour trip generation, data associated with boat launching facilities found on warm, sunny, summer days, no adverse traffic conditions will result. The levels of service will remain unchanged. Since there is no change in actual site access there will continue to be good entering sight distance (ESD) and so no adverse consequences will result by vehicles exiting the site. 1 Conclusions The following conclusions may be drawn from this study update. • The existing Kohl Excavating Company at 3330 East valley Road is considered a light industrial business in terms of its equipment with related office functions • The site has an area of some 179,793 square feet and is zoned for CA uses. • The proposed development as an R/V and boat storage yard will conform to the immediate neighborhood as it has currently developed. It is not considered a different land use in a traffic context. • The road network under review in this TIA includes the Valley Road from SW 34th Street past the neighboring sites. • At the present time the fronting arterial street has adequate capacity. • There are no published traffic generation data in any of the editions of Traffic Generation. • For the boat storage portion of yard, trip data was obtained on a sunny June day at the boat storage yard located at the north end of the Shilshole Bay Marina. No boats from the dry storage area on land were used. Only sailing dinghies located on a nearby float were used. There were 15 p.m. peak hour trips. Thus, that data is considered a worst case representation • For the RV portion of the yard, observations were made a. the Covington Mini- storage where some R/V's are stored. No trips were observed during the p.m. peak hour. • Since there are already trips associated with the present site usage, the net new traffic for proposed R/V and boat storage facility was computed based on the worst-case observations at the Shilshole Bay Marina. This amounted to 4 inbound and 6 outbound vehicle trips per hour. • The time when the project is complete and fully occupied is taken at the year 2004. This is the horizon year for the TIA. Christopher brown 0" Associate8 9688 rainier Ave. (S. -12- (Seattle, WA 98118-5981 (206) 722-1910 Fax (206) 722-1909� • The traffic assignment of site-generated traffic is based on unrestrained observed current p.m. peak hour turning movements. These will be representative of the future travel by R/V and boat storage tenants. • Current and future levels of service are all well within acceptable ranges: none is worse than LOS 'C'. • At the main entrance serving current and future yard there are no apparent entering sight distance (ESD) issues. • Since the City of Renton has a traffic mitigation fee schedule based on the average daily traffic an estimate was made of both future and current ADT. • For the R/V and boat storage yard the expected annualized ADT (including summer, fall, winter and spring seasons) is computed at 19 trips. • The ADT of the existing facility is estimated to be at least 36 trips. • Since the new site usage will reduce the amount of traffic on the arterial street system it is in fact a mitigation measure of an by itself The traffic reduction is (36-19) 17 trips per day. • Since the new traffic is less than the existing traffic there are no net new average daily trips. • The mitigation fee is $75.00 per new ADT. • Since there is no new ADT, in fact there is a reduction in ADT, there is no mitigation fee. 1,1 • No adverse traffic conditions are projected and no traffic mitigation measures are required. 1111 -13- Christopher Brown Cn Associates 9688 Rainier Ave. S. \` Seattle, WA 98118-5981 �� (206) 722-1910 Fax (206) 722-1902 I y R/V & Boat Storage Facility Renton 1 Traffic Impact Analysis 1 Appendix Table of Contents 1. P.M. Peak Hour Field Count, E. Valley Road/SW 34th Street Levels of Service E. Valley Road/SW 34th Street Current Volumes KOHL-C1P 2. b, E. Valley Road/SW 34th Street 2004 w/o Project KOHL-H1P 3. E. Valley Road/SW 34th Street 2004 w/Project KOHL-P1P 4. 1, E. Valley Road/Site Access Current Volumes KOHL-C1P . 5. E. Valley Road/Site Access 2004 w/o Project KOHL-H1P . 6.. 1 E. Valley Road/Site Access 2004 w/Project KOHL-P1P , 7. . The following are for information only; not used in study at Table III E. Valley Road/Imperials Bingo Current Volumes KOHL-C1P 8. E. Valley Road/Imperials Bingo 2004 w/o Project KOHL-H1P 9. E. Valley Road/Imperials Bingo 2004 w/Project KOHL-P1P 10. 1-r.A.INN C Chri&topher brown CtS ABsociates . 9688 12ainier Ave. �. Seattle, WA 98118-5981 (206) 222-1910 Fax (206) 722-1909/ , 1 T RAF FIi VOLUME SUMMA . r-7 c.:2.`T U -2' f - t DATE -&ilt /2.2oo2 DA`f ithel INTERSECTION OF : EAAje ''4d AND flit! .T`7/Ailh'cf TIME -?y-5 TO 37/- P =. PEAK HOUR �s- t..;r,,c vn,:e•s=- o..: 1---H-Cc Ljn,c ,--rin t.c-; -.:E - J T I ME ..1:-Lvi 2-i71 ' .p.?`,V4 . LSR , L I S R I L S 1 R L F S R 1 < 4t ,3'— ‘iUt) t. / I I 1' 0 1 16 D I a l 0 a I /col O "i1° ( q ' - / / I 1 F I DI 10 I, / 1 (7I6 I o I/Y2I , .z.z- zi/r - 4/901, 0 I l8 1, II o I - I9/ IZ I, / 1/0/ If f10 4/. ---yV, . / / 0 0 1 8 / I /2 L / zz& g /s-- I i , S 1:I o 016 fl / I, o 7 I / z . - ,S1s 1 / /7 0 0 13 , - / I 1 I, 0 /231 2a '- I 1._ I 1 I I I 1 _ T , Vrt) - 3' 6 I, 9 ;?3I 9 I I o /6 2y I g 1 2 69o1 .3-- - /4avy piI I I . I 1 ► I Iw _ T/v�hJ 2dy 0 0 i 51 8 I I 3I _ ..?ayl o a I, I H 8 I 1 _. I yexl a 1 , I I, o T I 1 / i l - 2 I I - I I I lf- I ' _ lf. c. 1 0 i I I I / I 1 / 1 _ Acres 1)'4n41 I 1 12- I - _hilt 22 /0 01 I O 12/ I c ( D I G ZI 0 , _ I 1 I, I I 1 I I I I I I 1' 1, C ! 1, 1 I i, I 1 1 I ; . I I 1 I I I, I I 1 I t . TOTALS L I 1 1 I I I I . of TOTAL\ , i ti Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst C. V. Brown Intersection E. Valley Road/SW 34th Agency/Co. Kohl Excavating Site Jurisdiction City of Renton Devel. Date Performed 6/21/2002 Analysis Year 2002 i' Analysis Time Period P.M. Peak Project ID East/West Street: SW 34th Street North/South Street: E. Valley Road 1 Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period (hrs): 1.00 1 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound 1 Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 16 324 0 0 470 5 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 17 360 0 0 522 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 — -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 0 a Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 0 0 0 3 0 35 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 3 0 38 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 5 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 1 0 1 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L R v (vph) 17 3 38 C (m) (vph) 1050 299 547 v/c 0.02 0.01 0.07 95% queue length 0.05 0.03 0.22 Control Delay 8.5 17.2 12.1 LOS A C B Approach Delay -- -- 12.4 Approach LOS -- -- B file://C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\Local Settings\Temp\u2k4.tmp 6/21/2002 ; • Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst C. V. Brown Intersection E. Valley Road/SW 34th Agency/Co. Kohl Excavating Site Jurisdiction City of Renton Devel. Analysis Year 2004 without Project Date Performed 6/21/2002 Analysis Time Period P.M. Peak Project ID Kohl Excavating East/West Street: SW 34th Street . North/South Street: E. Valley Road t Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period (hrs): 1.00 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound , Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 17 340 0 0 493 5 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 18 377 0 0 547 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 — — 0 -- — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 0 '' Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 0 0 0 3 0 37 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 3 0 41 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 5 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 1 0 1 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length,and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L R v (vph) 18 3 41 C (m) (vph) 1028 281 529 v/c 0.02 0.01 0.08 95% queue length 0.05 0.03 0.25 Control Delay 8.6 17.9 12.4 LOS A C B Approach Delay -- -- 12.8 Approach LOS -- -- B file://C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\Local Settings\Temp\u2k4.tmp 6/21/2002 Two-Way S top Control Page 1 of 2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst C. V. Brown Intersection E. Valley Road/SW 34th Agency/Co. Kohl Excavating Site Jurisdiction City of Renton Devel. Date Performed 6/21/2002 Analysis Year 2004 with Project Analysis Time Period P.M. Peak Project ID Kohl Excavating East/West Street: SW 34th Street North/South Street: E. Valley Road Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period (hrs): 1.00 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 17 342 0 0 493 5 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.90 • Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 18 380 0 0 547 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound "` Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 0 0 0 3 0 37 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 3 0 41 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 5 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 1 0 1 Configuraticn L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L R v (vph) 18 3 41 C (m) (vph) 1028 280 529 v/c 0.02 0.01 0.08 95% queue length 0.05 0.03 0.25 Control Delay 8.6 _ 18.0 12.4 LOS A C B Approach Delay -- -- 12.8 Approach LOS -- -- B file://C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\Local Settings\Temp\u2k4.tmp 6/21/2002 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 2 rli TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst C. V. Brown E. Valley Road/Site Intersection Agency/Co. Kohl Excavating Site Access bevel. Jurisdiction City of Renton Date Performed 6/21/2002 Analysis Year 2002 Analysis Time Period P.M. Peak Project ID Kohl Excavating East/West Street: Site Access - One Driveway North/South Street: E. Valley Road Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period (hrs): 1.00 1 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 16 324 0 1 470 0 11 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 360 0 1 522 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 — — 0 — — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration TR L T Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 2 0 2 3 0 35 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 2 0 2 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 ' 0 5 — Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 , RT Channelized 0 0 I Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 0 Configuration LTR Delay, Queue Length,and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LTR v (vph) 1 4 C (m) (vph) 1210 435 v/c 0.00 0.01 95% queue length 0.00 0.03 Control Delay 8.0 13.4 LOS A B Approach Delay -- -- 13.4 Approach LOS -- -- B file://C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\Local Settings\Temp\u2k17.tmp 6/21/2002 i Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 2 i TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst C. V. Brown E. Valley Road/Site Intersection Agency/Co. Kohl Excavating Site Access Devel. Jurisdiction City of Renton Date Performed 6/21/2002 Analysis Year 2004 without Project Analysis Time Period P.M. Peak Project ID Kohl Excavating East/West Street: Site Access - One Driveway North/South Street: E. Valley Road Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period (hrs): 1.00 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume I 16 344 0 1 486 1 0 1 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.90 • Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 382 0 1 540 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration TR L T Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 I 12 L T R L T . R Volume 2 0 2 3 0 35 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 2 0 2 0 - 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 5 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach I N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 0 Configuration LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LTR v (vph) 1 4 C (m) (vph) 1188 416 L• v/c 0.00 0.01 '95% queue length 0.00 0.03 Control Delay 8.0 13.7 • LOS A B Approach Delay -- -- 13.7 Approach LOS -- -- B file://C:ADocuments and Settings\Administrator\Local Settings\Temo\u2k13.tmn 6/21/2002 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst C. V. Brown E. Valley Road/Site Intersection Agency/Co. Kohl Excavating Site Access bevel. Jurisdiction City of Renton Date Performed 6/21/2002 Analysis Year 2004 with Project ,i, Analysis Time Period P.M. Peak Project ID Kohl Excavating East/West Street: Site Access - One Driveway North/South Street: E. Valley Road Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period (hrs): 1.00 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street I Northbound Southbound .: Movement 1 2 1 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 16 343 2 2 489 I 0 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 381 2 2 543 0 11 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided " RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 1 1 0 . Configuration TR L T Upstream Signal 0 1 0 Minor Street I Westbound Eastbound a Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 j' L T R L T R Volume 4 0 2 3 0 35 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 _ 1.00 0.90 1.00 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 4 0 2 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 ' 0 0 0 5 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 0 Configuration LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service I Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 I 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LTR I I v (vph) 2 6 C (m) (vph) 1187 367 v/c 0.00 0.02 95% queue length 0.01 0.05 Control Delay 8.0 15.0- LOS A B Approach Delay -- -- 15.0- Approach LOS -- -- B i 1file://C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\Local Settings\Temp\u2k13.tmp 6/21/2002 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst C. V. Brown E. Valley Road/Imperials Intersection Agency/Co. Kohl Excavating Site Bingo S;, bevel. Jurisdiction City of Renton i Date Performed 6/21/2002 Analysis Year 2002 Analysis Time Period P.M. Peak Project ID Kohl Excavating East/West Street: Site Access - One Driveway North/South Street: E. Valley Road Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period (hrs): 1.00 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments , Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 I 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 1 327 1 2 460 3 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 I 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1 363 1 2 511 3 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 ( I 0 Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound I Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 1 0 0 6 0 10 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1 0 0 6 0 11 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 • 0 5 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 " RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 H1 12 Lane Configuration L L LTR LTR v (vph) 1 2 1 17 C (m) (vph) 1062 1206 261 403 v/c 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 95% queue length 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.13 Control Delay 8.4 8.0 18.8 14.3 LOS A A C B Approach Delay -- -- 18.8 14.3 Approach LOS -- -- C B file://C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\Local Settings\Temp\u2k17.tmp 6/21/2002 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Genera! information Site Information Analyst C. V. Brown E. Valley Road/Imperials r Intersection Agency/Co. Kohl Excavating Site Bingo i, Devel. Jurisdiction City of Renton Date Performed 6/21/2002 Analysis Year 2004 without Project Analysis Time Period P.M. Peak Project ID Kohl Excavating East/West Street: Site Access - One Driveway North/South Street: E. Valley Road Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period (hrs): 1.00 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 I 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 1 344 1 2 460 3 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Houny Flow Rate, HFR 1 382 1 2 511 3 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street I Westbound I Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 1 0 0 6 0 10 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1 0 0 6 0 11 °, Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 5 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 • Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR 1 LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L LTR LTR v (vph) 1 2 1 17 C (m) (vph) 1062 1187 253 397 v/c 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 95% queue length 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.13 Control Delay 8.4 8.0 19.3 14.5 LOS A A C B Approach Delay -- -- 19.3 14.5 Approach LOS -- -- C B file://C:ADocuments and Settings\Administrator\Local Settings\Temp\u2k17.tmp 6/21/2002 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst C. V. Brown E. Valley Road/Imperials Intersection Agency/Co. Kohl Excavating Site Bingo • Devel. Jurisdiction City of Renton Date Performed 6/21/2002 Analysis Year 2004 with Project Analysis Time Period P.M. Peak Project ID Kohl Excavating 1 East/West Street: Site Access - One Driveway North/South Street: E. Valley Road Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period (hrs): 1.00 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 1 343 1 2 476 3 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1 381 1 2 528 3 I Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized I 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 1 0 0 6 0 10 i Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1 0 0 6 0 11 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 5 i i Percent Grade (%) 0 0 I Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR i, Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L LTR LTR v (vph) 1 2 1 17 C (m) (vph) 1047 1188 246 387 v/c 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 95% queue length 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.14 Control Delay 8.4 8.0 19.7 14.7 LOS A A C B Approach Delay -- -- 19.7 14.7 Approach LOS -- -- C B file://C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\Local Settings\Temp\u2k17.tmp 6/21/2002 Berggist Engineering Services 32240 8th Avenue SW PO. Box 25804 Federal Way, Washington 98023 Federal Way, Washington 98093 Phone: 253.661 .7658, Fax: 253.661 .1399, e-mail: RBergqu510@aol.com November 8, 1999 Mr. Ivan Christianson DC Enterprises, LP 3330 East Valley Highway OEVELOPME Renton, Washington 98055-4065 Cr7yOFAEivrorgN►NG JUN272002 Re: Subsurface Exploration and Engineering Analysis Proposed Silver Dollar Casino RECEIVED 3330 East Valley Highway Renton, Washington BES Project Number: 99141 Dear Mr. Christianson: II Bergquist Engineering Services is pleased to provide this report of the geotechnical exploration for the referenced project. Our services were performed in accordance with BES Proposal Number 14099, dated October 4, 1999. The attached report summarizes project and site data, describes the services we performed, and presents our recommendations regarding foundations, lateral earth pressures, and earthwork. The appendix of the report presents site maps, boring logs, and explanatory aids Based on our exploration and engineering analysis, the proposed one-story, casino building may be supported on conventional spread-footings founded on at least three feet of structural backfill if the site is properly preloaded. Individual column and continuous wall footings may be designed using a net allowable bearing capacity of up to 2,500 psf. All footings should be founded in structural backfill that will replace the undocumented, rubble- containing fill currently on the building site. To reduce post construction settlement and the effects of soil liquefaction, we recommend that the site be preloaded prior to erection of the building. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION Proposed Silver Dollar Casino DC Enterprises, LP Renton, Washington BES Project N )er 99141 , Report 1 Specific recommendations relative to the structural backfill, preload, and design and construction of this project are presented in the attached report. The subsurface conditions and recommendations presented should be verified during construction. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you. If you have any questions concerning this report, or if we may be of additional service, please contact us. Sincerely, . 1)E Bergquist Engineering Services I EXPIRES � v Richard A. Bergquist, P.E. Principal ii a 1 GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION PROPOSED SILVER DOLLAR CASINO ' 3330 EAST VALLEY ROAD RENTON, WASHINGTON 1.1 PREPARED FOR: DC ENTERPRISES, LP BY: Bergquist Engineering Services BES Project Number: 99141 , Report 1 1. INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of our geotechnical exploration and engineering evaluation for the proposed Silver Dollar Casino to be constructed at 3330 East Valley Road in Renton, Washington. The location of the site is shown on the Vicinity Map in the Appendix of this report. The geotechnical evaluation was performed by Bergquist Engineering Services (BES) to provide information or recommendations regarding: • seismic design considerations including liquefaction potential, • allowable bearing capacity and depth of suitable foundation systems with estimated settlements,• lateral earth pressures and friction coefficients, • earthwork, and • site preparation. Delores Christianson, president of DC Enterprises, LP authorized our work by signing and returning a copy of BES's Proposal Number 14099, dated October 4, 1999. i . I TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 I1 . 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2 3. SCOPE OF SERVICES 2 I4. SITE CHARACTERIZATION 2 4.1 Surface 3 I4.2 Subsurface Soil and Groundwater 3 5. DISCUSSION 4 I6. RECOMMENDATIONS 4 6.1 Seismic Considerations 4 I6.2 Foundations 4 I 6.3 Cast-in-Place Concrete 6 6.4 Earthwork 7 I 6.4.1 Excavation 7 6.4.2 Site Clearing 7 6.4.3 Foundation Preparation 7 6.4.4 Slab-On-Grade Preparation 9 li 6.4.5 Materials 9 6.4.6 Placement and Compaction 10 6.5 Drainage 10 6.6 Groundwater 11 6.7 Construction Observation and Testing 11 II 7. REPORT LIMITATIONS 12 APPENDIX Vicinity Map Al Site Plan A2 Boring Log A3 Boring Log Notes A8 Unified Soil Classification System Al 0 Notes Al 1 • Proposed Silver Dollar Casino November 8, 1999 Renton, Washington BES Project Number 99141, Report 1 r 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Final site grading and building plans were not available at the time this report was prepared. The project description is therefore, based on information provided by Jim Jaeger of Jaeger Engineering, Rocky Kohl of DC Enterprises, LP, and on a drawing entitled VICINITY MAP prepared by the firm of Commercial By Design and revised on 9 September 1999. We understand that the proposed single-story, 200-foot long by 100-foot wide casino building will be constructed on about 4.1 acres at 3330 East Valley Road in Renton, Washington. It will be constructed as a concrete, slab-on-grade building with high-bay, pre-cast, tilt-up, concrete walls. The finished floor elevation will be one to two feet above the existing ground surface elevation in the area of the proposed building. Maximum column loads are estimated to be 40 kips and maximum perimeter wall loads are estimated to be 3 kips per lineal foot. Maximum floor loads are estimated to be about 100 pounds per square foot. As shown on the SITE PLAN presented in the Appendix of this report, the proposed building will be situated near the east edge of the property. At-grade parking will be provided on the west, north and south sides of the proposed building. 3. SCOPE OF SERVICES The scope of services included a reconnaissance of the site by the geotechnical engineer, a review of geologic literature, drilling and sampling four borings, and developing these engineering recommendations. The engineering recommendations and advice presented in this report have been made in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical-engineering practices in the area. 4. SITE CHARACTERIZATION The information presented in this section was gathered by BES personnel for geotechnical engineering purposes only. This site characterization does not and was not intended to address the presence or likelihood of contamination on or around the site. Bergquist Engineering Services Page 2 of 12 Proposed Silver Dollar Casino November 8, 1999 Renton, Washington BES Project Number 99141, Report 1 4.1 Surface ' At the time of our exploration, the surface of the site was relatively flat with a surface elevation of about 20 feet above mean sea level. In general, the surface of the site was covered with ' gravel. The only vegetation on the site was present along the east boundary and consisted of brush and weeds. A 1 ,600 square-foot, single-story, office building was located near the southwest corner of the site. The area west of the office building was covered with asphaltic !' ' concrete pavement. The area east of this building and essentially the southern half of the roughly 4.1-acre site was being used as an equipment and material storage yard for Kohl ' Excavating, Inc. The northern half of the roughly 4.1 -acre site was being used as a storage area for construction and landscaping materials. 4.2 Subsurface Soil and Groundwater The subsurface soil and groundwater conditions at this site are described in the following paragraphs and are presented graphically on the boring logs in the Appendix of this report. The stratification lines indicated on the boring logs represent the approximate boundaries between soil types. Actual boundaries may be gradual and the transitions may not be easily discernible during site excavation. I i In general, the ground surface at the site of the proposed casino building was covered Sandy GRAVEL fill to a depth of one (1) to one and one-half (11/2) feet. As indicated by the four borings, the subsurface soils within the footprint of the proposed building consist of fill to a depth ranging from four (4) to seven (7) feet. The fill consists of dark brown, Silty SAND to GRAVEL-SAND-SILT with cobbles, broken concrete, lumber, and miscellaneous debris. Underlying the fill, a two- to four-foot-thick layer of brown PEAT (PT) was encountered. This ' PEAT is very soft with "N-Values" ranging from weight-of-the-rods to about three blows per foot at natural moisture contents ranging from 91 .6 to 226.8 percent. Underlying the PEAT and extending the full depth of exploration, alternating layers of gray, very loose to loose SILT (ML) and gray fine SAND (SP) were encountered. The "N-Values" of these soils ranged from weight of the rods to 9 blows per foot. The natural moisture content of ranged from 25.3 to 67.6 percent. Groundwater was encountered in each of the borings at a depth of about five (5) to six (6) feet below the ground surface. Groundwater readings in granular soils, such as those encountered on this site, are generally accurate even after short periods of observation. Bergquist Engineering Services Page 3 of 12 . Proposed Silver Dollar Casino November 8, 1999 Renton, Washington BES Project Number 99141, Report 1 Whereas, the groundwater level in fine-grained (silt and clay) soils may require several days of observation before it becomes stable and accurate. 5. DISCUSSION The recommendations presented in this report are based on our understanding of the project as presented in the Project Description Section and on the assumption that the subsurface conditions encountered in the borings adequately represent conditions near and between the exploratory borings. Because project conditions regarding type and location of structures and foundation loads can change and because subsurface conditions are not always similar to those encountered in the borings, the geotechnical engineer must be contacted for review and possible revision of the recommendations if discrepancies are noticed. lu 6. RECOMMENDATIONS The following sections of this report present recommendations regarding foundations for the structure, slabs-on-grade, and for earthwork, excavations, drainage, and groundwater. 6.1 Seismic Considerations According to Figure No. 16-2 of the 1997 edition of the Uniform Building Code (UBC), the project site is in Seismic Zone 3. According to Table 16-J of the UBC, the site soil profile is �p best represented by a Soil Profile Type SF. Seismically induced settlement of the foundation soils may occur; however, such settlement will probably affect relatively large areas so that differential settlements over the short foundation distances associated with this project will likely be within tolerable limits. The soils below the water table at this site are probably susceptible to liquefaction; however, if the foundation and earthwork recommendations presented in this report are followed the risk of catastrophic failure will be minimal if not remote. 6.2 Foundations Design and construction of the proposed building on this site is influenced by several factors including: (1) the presence of uncontrolled, rubble-containing fill to a depth of about seven Bergquist Engineering Services Page 4 of 12 Proposed Silver Dollar Casino November 8, 1999 Renton, Washington BES Project Number 99141, Report 1 I � feet below the surface, (2) the presence of a layer of very soft, highly compressible PEAT beneath the fill, (3) the presence of very loose to loose silts and fine sands extending to considerable depth, and (4) the presence of a shallow groundwater table. Uncontrolled, debris-containing fill and PEAT soils are not suitable for support of the type of structure planned at this site. Total and differential settlement of the structure could be excessive if the foundation loads are not transmitted to stronger, more competent soils below the site or if underlying soils are not improved or densified. The foundation loads could be transmitted to more competent soils with a pile foundation system. However, we understand that the cost of a pile foundation system for this project would be prohibitive. Therefore, some method of soil improvement should be used to reduce total and differential settlement of the proposed building should be implemented. There are numerous methods available to improve the subsurface soils to reduce post construction settlement of the proposed building. Some of the available methods, such as soil densification by vibro-displacement, and soil densification by preloading would be viable alternatives for this site. Methods such as dynamic compaction, compaction grouting, and permanent soil freezing will not be discussed because of their cost or incompatibility with this site. We recommend that the subsoils be improved with a combination of removal and replacement and preloading of the site. If the earthwork and preload recommendations provided in this report are followed, a spread footing foundation system placed on at least three feet (3) of structural backfill may be used to support the proposed building and floor slabs. Individual column and continuous wall footings founded on at least three feet (3') of structural backfill may be designed using a net allowable bearing pressure of up to 2,500 psf. If the recommendations in this report are followed, total post construction settlement of the foundation will be about two inches (2") with differential settlement of about one inch (1 ") The recommended minimum dimension for individual column footings is 24 inches and the recommended minimum dimension for continuous wall footings is 18 inches. The allowable bearing capacity may be increased by one-third for wind and seismic loads. Perimeter footings should be at least 18 inches below finished grade for frost protection. Interior footings should be at least 12 inches below finished grade. Finished grade is the top of finished floor for interior footings and lowest adjacent grade for exterior footings. Bergquist Engineering Services Page 5 of 12 'i Proposed Silver Dollar Casino November 8, 1999 Renton, Washington BES Project Number 99141, Report 1 r backfill, Lateral earth pressures for design of foundations, or short retaining walls with level and without hydrostatic pressures or surcharge loads, may be calculated using the equivalent fluid pressures presented below: Active: Undisturbed subsoils 45 psf/ft. Compacted granular soils 40 psf/ft. Passive: Continuous footings in structural backfill 350 psf/ft. Column footings in structural backfill 400 psf/ft. An ultimate coefficient of friction between footings and structural backfill bearing soils of 0.55 may be used to resist lateral foundation loads. If passive earth pressures are used in conjunction with base friction to resist lateral loads, reduce the ultimate coefficient of friction to 0.45. A factor of safety of 1 .5 should be applied to these values. Reinforcement of footings and stem walls to reduce the potential for distress caused by differential foundation movements should be evaluated during design. The size, quantity, and location of reinforcement should be determined by a qualified engineer. All footing excavations at this site should be inspected by the geotechnical engineer prior to concrete placement and preferably, prior to placement of reinforcing steel. 6.3 Slabs-on-Grade Slabs-on-grade should be supported on the structural backfill recommended in this report. All concrete, especially slabs-on-grade, should be placed at minimum water-cement ratios on moistened surfaces and properly cured to minimize shrinkage, cracking, warping, and curling. Concrete slabs should be allowed to cure adequately before subjecting them to full design loads. Where moisture sensitive floor coverings are going to be placed on slabs-on-grade, polyethylene sheeting should be placed on the granular base to act as a vapor barrier. In addition, the floor covering should not be placed until the concrete floor has cured sufficiently. Bergquist Engineering Services Page 6 of 12 Proposed Silver Dollar Casino November 8, 1999 Renton, Washington BES Project Number 99141, Report 1 I 6.4 Earthwork The recommendations presented in this report are predicated on fulfillment of the following earthwork recommendations. 6.4.1 Excavation: Conventional, excavating equipment is expected to be suitable for the proposed foundation and shallow utility excavations. Side slopes of excavations deeper than ' four (4) feet should be no steeper than one and one-half (1 .5) horizontal to one (1) vertical (1 .5H:1 V). Federal and state governments promulgate rules and standards regarding ' excavations that must be followed. If the dimensions of the site prevent the use of maximum slopes of 1 .5H:1 V, the slopes must be stabilized or shored to facilitate safe excavations. The geotechnical engineer should be contacted if such techniques are going to be employed. I 6.4.2 Site Clearing: In general, any loose soil (fill or native), remnant asphalt or concrete pavement and portland cement concrete floor slabs, and other deleterious materials must be removed from the project area prior to construction. After site clearing, the exposed surface Ishould be graded relatively flat to allow for proper subgrade preparation but sloped slightly to allow good surface drainage. The entire surface of the subgrade should be rolled with a ' steel-drum roller to tighten the surface soils to enhance surface runoff. Buried utility lines will be encountered and buried structures or debris may be encountered during site clearing. When such objects are encountered, the geotechnical engineer should be notified immediately for additional recommendations. Generally, buried objects will be removed and the resulting excavation will be backfilled with imported soil (see Table 6.1) and compacted in accordance with Paragraph 6.4.6 of this report. 6.4.3 Foundation Preparation: The intent of the recommendations provided in this report is to place the shallow foundations and interior floor slab on structural.backfill that has been preloaded to reduce post construction settlement. Accordingly, the undocumented fill beneath the proposed building should be removed to a sufficient depth to provide at least three vertical feet of structural backfill beneath the footings. Based on the assumed finish floor elevation and recommended foundation depth, we estimate that about three (3) feet of the existing undocumented fill beneath the entire building site will need to be removed and replaced with structural backfill. The excavation to remove the undocumented fill should extend laterally at least ten feet beyond the projected outside edge of the proposed perimeter Bergquist Engineering Services Page 7 of 12 Proposed Silver Dollar Casino November 8, 1999 Renton, Washington BES Project Number 99141, Report 1 I footings. The geotechnical engineer should inspect the surface of the excavation created by Iremoval of the undocumented fill prior to placement of structural backfill to ensure that organic debris and other deleterious materials have been removed. The surface of the excavation should then be compacted with a vibratory, steel-drum roller to a relatively unyielding surface. The excavation may then be backfilled to design subgrade elevation with structural fill meeting the criteria presented in Paragraphs 6.4.5 and 6.4.6 of this report. Once the structural backfill is placed, the building site should be preloaded and allowed to settle prior to construction of the building. Soil used to create the preload may consist of native or fill soil found on-site or imported soil capable of producing uniform pressures over the entire building site and for a distance of at least ten feet beyond the perimeter footing edges. In order to provide for lateral drainage of surface water and groundwater from beneath the preload, a twelve-inch (12') thick blanket of clean, free-draining granular material should be Iplaced on the entire area to be preloaded prior to placement of the preload material. Soils used for the preload should achieve a moist unit weight of at least 115 pounds per cubic foot. Depending upon the type of soils used for the preload, some cornpactive effort may be required to achieve the recommended minimum unit weight. Side-slopes of the preload ' should be constructed on a slope of 1 horizontal to 1 vertical (1 H:1V) with the crest of the slopes at least ten feet beyond the outside edge of the perimeter footings. The preload ' should be of uniform thickness with a height of at least four and one-half (4.5') feet above the design subgrade elevation. Primary consolidation of the underlying soils within significant influence of the preload is estimated to take six to eight weeks. The actual length of time that Ithe preload is in-place should, however, be based on actual settlements measured by the use of properly installed settlement plates. A minimum of five settlement plates (one in each corner of the building and one in the center of the building) should be placed on the surface of the structural backfill and maintained during the life of the preload. The settlement plates should be monitored using standard level ' survey techniques. During placement of the preload, the elevation of the settlement plates and adjacent top of preload fill should be determined at least twice a day (once in the morning and once in the evening). Once the preload fill is placed, the elevation of each of ' the settlement plates should be determined once a day for the first week and once every IBergquist Engineering Services Page 8 of 12 Proposed Silver Dollar Casino November 8, 1999 II Renton, Washington BES Project Number 99141, Report 1 I I I seven days thereafter for the remainder of the preload period. Bergquist Engineering Services 1 Ishould approve the fabricated settlement plates prior to installation, observe their installation, ;j oversee monitoring of the elevations, and evaluate the settlement data to determine when ,i 'I Iprimary consolidation has been attained and when the preload soil may be removed. 6.4.4 Slab-On-Grade Preparation: Specialized treatment of the soil beneath the interior Islab-on-grade floor of this project is not anticipated. Because, if the recommendations provided in the previous section of this report are followed, the entire slab-on-grade floor will I be supported on structural backfill. i i I6.4.5 Materials: In general, because of their moisture sensitivity, the site soils are not suitable for use as structural fill or structural backfill. Structural fill and backfill soil should be I imported and conform to the gradation presented in Table 6.1 , and be approved by the 1 geotechnical engineer prior to use. A sample of the proposed structural backfill soil must be delivered to the geotechnical engineer at least 72 hours before the contractor intends to use Iit. ,u I TABLE 6.1 GRADATION REQUIREMENTS FOR STRUCTURAL FILLii eri _ I4S-StQndcnrd_Ate - ._— Pecent-assing_ i 3-inch 100 I I3/4-inch 50-100 I No. 4 25-65 I I No. 10 10-50 i No. 40 0-20 i I No. 200 0-4* *Note: The percent passing the No. 200 sieve is based on the I I weight of the material passing the 3/4-inch sieve. 1 1 I If construction is performed during the wet season, a granular base or work blanket may be required. Granular materials used as a work blanket should conform to the gradation Ipresented in Table 6.2, and be approved by the geotechnical engineer prior to use. I IBergquist Engineering Services Page 9 of 12 I Proposed Silver Dollar Casino November 8, 1999 111 Renton, Washington BES Project Number 99141, Report 1 I 11 ITABLE 6.2 GRADATION REQUIREMENTS FOR WORK BLANKET ...=_ k S Standczrd SieVe_t - r T rtdhf[ftassing I I 4-inch 100 � I No. 200 4 maximum* *Note: The percent passing the No. 200 sieve is based on the I Iweight of the material passing the 3/4-inch sieve. l I I6.4.6 Placement and Compaction: All fill and backfill materials should be placed in relatively horizontal loose lifts not exceeding 10 inches in thickness and compacted to at least I95 percent of the modified Proctor (ASTM 1557) maximum density at moisture contents within two (2) percent of optimum. The specified compacted density and moisture content of I each lift must be verified by test, prior to placement of subsequent lifts. Placement on frozen ground should not be attempted. I6.5 Drainage I, Good drainage is considered critical to the performance of earth-supported structures such Ias foundations, slabs-on-grade, and pavements. Therefore, construction grades and final site grades should be designed to prevent water from ponding in areas on or adjacent to Ifoundations, slabs-on-grade, pavements, and retaining walls. Infiltration of water into foundation and utility excavations should be prevented during construction and throughout I the life of the project. 1 A perimeter footing drain-system consisting of a rigid, perforated pipe surrounded by pea I Igravel is recommended. The pea gravel should be separated from the surrounding soil by a ! U filter fabric. The collected water should be tight-lined away from the building to a suitable Idischarge system. Roof and surface drains should be provided but they should not be connected to the footing-drain system. I Where pavement does not immediately abut structures, slopes, with an outfall of at least three I (3) percent for a minimum distance of ten (10) feet from exterior footings, should be provided. I IBergquist Engineering Services Page 10 of 12 I Proposed Silver Dollar Casino November 8, 1999 Renton, Washington BES Project Number 99141, Report 1 During excavation for and placement of the structural backfill and during placement through removal of the preload soils, adequate erosion control measures should be installed and maintained. These measures may include the installation of silt fences and/or hay bales at appropriate locations to collect sediments. 6.6 Groundwater The groundwater level at this site is shallow and should be expected to fluctuate due to seasonal variations and man-made alterations made to the watershed. Therefore, the contractor should be responsible for mitigating any groundwater conditions that may be encountered during construction to keep the excavation dry. 6.7 Construction Observation and Testing The recommendations presented in this report rely on adequate observation and testing of construction materials and procedures by the geotechnical engineer or his qualified representative. At a minimum, the testing program should include: • Observation and review by the geotechnical engineer of site clearing and review of all foundation excavations to evaluate whether actual conditions are consistent with those encountered during exploration. • Observation by the geotechnical engineer of placement and overseeing monitoring of settlement plates in the preload. • Observation by the geotechnical engineer of placement of the footing drain system to ensure proper installation. • Observation and testing of placement and compaction of all fill and backfill materials to evaluate compliance with specifications. • Field inspection and laboratory testing of materials and field inspection of methods as required by the appropriate Uniform Building Code. Typically, this includes inspection of placement of reinforcing steel; inspection and testing of Portland cement concrete to evaluate compliance with specifications regarding slump, temperature, air content and strength; and inspection of structural steel. Bergquist Engineering Services Page 11 of 12 'I Proposed Silver Dollar Casino November 8, 1999 I' Renton, Washington BES Project Number 99141, Report 1 I 7. REPORT LIMITATIONS The recommendations presented in this report are for the exclusive use of DC Enterprises, LP I for the proposed casino building to be constructed at 3330 East Valley Road in Renton, Washington. The recommendations are based on the site surface and subsurface information gathered by Bergquist Engineering Services and on design details for the project provided by Jim Jaeger of Jaeger Engineering, Rocky Kohl of DC Enterprises, LP, and on a drawing entitled VICINITY MAP prepared by the firm of Commercial By Design and revised on 9 September 1999. If there are any revisions to the plans or if deviations from the subsurface conditions noted in this report are encountered during construction, BES should be notified immediately to determine whether changes to the foundation recommendations are required. After the plans and specifications are more complete, the geotechnical engineer should be ' provided the opportunity to review them to check that these engineering recommendations have been interpreted properly. I 000 I ' Bergquist Engineering Services Page 12 of 12 I I I I I Z w I /A,' ..,m Sr SW lip sT D �� RCNIWY Z h nw < ` uBERTY in' n - yt "' � Q 5M : d Z PN _ Rr - ti, ,. -t S --I 2N i e.,PAS( _`CEDAR ,� ;. _ . I >AN< '.. L ,, 100 N < 900 F. a • --.-RIVER PARK sw pp ". S3RD liIST < 8, / :�� _ 15 IV • `lRiitlas 900..."_ _.. .:2/i 90C1rieriMr yam, S 6 li� a,, s Q ,.f N FRfD ?s � _' •� J SR rR alim MEYER S tT+ �/ w wtdt • 4S,c ' REXlt1N P 5TH 3 ST y CENTER L �ff g `�y i I �� ler RR �I I� < S 6TN 5T P; ' ��► 167 fill3L ,_, y' I OA, SY 7TF1 V�(W�",.` 6TH S 0. E • Apt a l � 1t _ KIR�_ Nst +� <I PARK■ Q`t • c11, GATE t > RID ? 515 W ` • It 1 4. r MICtfI. t _ "� �1AGE �� ARNOLD , I , ► I 1 �; � � SPARKS , I • 1�W R ON UGE PL I ` 2�S hC111DAY I �����ig � 13SH +.INN ❑ FEW s�4a5 0 / �� i MJ ��._._.r- C j4 Z .......-- c 405 i' a 20 8/41 w 'a .I _PAcr. ds15TH � 16TH ST ,T _ ST... _ 4O0 'C ... s $ S 16TH ST y�� s f '161 n r- r.i`A. .<, V & frr r. ,pry L ,s- y is _H . sc r���� I 19TH ST �19 STD �� - I iF _ jer�,_~CT S 19TH ST sTALBOT +ids N PARTNER N S 2. -PLzoTHNICC .V ,�, PpLUM6 i„ �1� asr s tir PARK 1 ' I. L. PUGET %Is 14.1 CREE. y Si 21ST ST // 4.... '� ^isT S ch215T .�" wETLAR05 a u� ,_ CTHt N s RD _ SM 23RD ST S _23RDgig ST _. x e E - I . 1 0 P zr 1 mats �' NW7 ti * ►A. I.LJ W N G �.�. �' S. �. 1 r, SW 27TN < ., 3 ST a gym,Q S Q, t S 27 ?W SE 1 I ST 1fi`' Li 7� vS lai 109OO �„Si r. SIrTH :TN ��S �Sµ •�� < .2 R WINO' T: . PL s t '0 4J .t 8 29TH ST < 29TH ST '20 s,, � s S 1 , L rr E I ST _ 3'a SE 167TH n � S F. I al I 30 4 ' y, _ R N�: j tit "Amnia .. �.�'< s 7w Or ♦maw \' sE•31ST ST Ct,. 4 29w •..n ' +rrt uns S31 1Q PE S" I a $S SE 169TH I 91 33A0 ST i J�iv I df`. OL f $E-(17OTH ST i co d SY4TH STANT, 34TH ST S 't` SE 10800 `ys �J� ST RfX/AM o CREE� • "'Sr •k ,., S 15 �; s, .WK/is 4 1 I VICINITY MAP Proposed: Silver Dollar Casino gergquist Engineering For: DC Enterprises, LP Location: Renton,Washington Services SE9 Project Number:99141 I Date: November,1999 Al II j. B3 , 131 I I m Proposed Building ' j. 1 1 1 I ' ® 1 134 B2 1 1' I ! ' ii ! 1 ' ' !, I ! , i j Planned Pa 1ng Area ! ! 1 ! I I ! , ! N ! Property Line East Valley Highway SITE PLAN Proposed: Silver Dollar Casino For: DC Enterprises, LP Bergquist Engineering Location: Renton,Washington Services DES Project Number:99141 Date: November,1999 A2 .1 Berc list Engineering Services I Log of Boring 1 IProject: Proposed Silver Dollar Casino Drill gig: Mobile 1324 Location: Renton, WA boring Size: 8"/HSA I DES Project No.: 99141, RPT. 1 Drilled By: Gregory Drilling, Inc. Date Drilled: October 21, 1999 Logged Dy: IZ. A. Dergctuist, PE Approximate Ground Surface Elevation: 20 feet I Sample _ N-Value i7eptb Wad Description and USC-� — �#eet I �um6er and � lou--5/,4" Cr+i ent I; - Gi4s rf -Ati m m_. fiyze no .« 1AU -- 7.4 _ _ 0 Dark brown SAND(SP) with gravel,cobbles,broken — I — concrete,lumber(Fill) — _5_ 255 14 7.3 _5I _ 355 WIZ 226.8 _ Brown PEAT(PT) I _10_ 455 1 217.0 _10 • 45.5 _ I - Brown SILT(ML) occasional thin seams of fine sand,occasional thin layers of organic materials — _15_ 555 449.7 _ _ _ 38.6 _ Gray,fine SAND(5P) — — Gray SILT(ML) — _20_ 655 6 33.8 —20_• Gray,fine SAND(SP) _ _25 755 WIZ 52.1 Gray SILT(ML) _25_ Log of Boring continued on next page. A3 Berc list Engineering Services Log of Boring 1 Continued Pe h 5mple �{ `Value V�a_ter t2ek� n1 �� I = Number and i3lo+ec5� Content - �t aeon Type - 25 755 WR 52.1 I _25_ — — ML Gray SILT( ) _ I _ _30 Gray SAND-SILT(5M) _30_ — 855 2 27.0 — 5— _55_ ' — 955 5 28.2 — Gray,fine SILTY-SAND(5M) _40_ �— ' — 1055 9 25.3 Gray,fine to medium SAND, (5P) _45_ 45_ 1155 8 26.5 End of boring. — 50 _50_ A4 Berc list Engineering Services 1 I Log of Poring 2 IProject: Proposed Silver Dollar Casino Drill Rig: Mobile 524 Location: Renton, WA Boring Size: 8"/H5A I BE5 Project No.: 99141, RPT. 1 Drilled By: Gregory Drilling, Inc. Date Drilled: October 21, 1999 Logged By: R. A. Bergquist, PE Approximate Ground Surface Elevation: 20.5 feet I _ � � am-Ig- �Tt�e- — _ ��� Mgr_ �_� a _ 1AU -- 3.4 _ Brown,Silty SAND with gravel,broken concrete, _ I _ trace lumber(ML) (Fill) _5— 255 4 8.8 —5_ I 355 2 91.6 _ P Dark brown PEAT(PT) — 10 455 4 119.4 10 IGray SILT(ML) — _15_ 555 9 39.6 _15_ Gray fine SAND(5P) — I I _20_ 655 7 38.0 Gray SILT(ML) 20 - Gray fine SAND(5P) I - - I25 _25_ I A5 I Berg st Engineering Services I Log of Boring 3 ii IProject: Proposed Silver Dollar Casino Drill Rig: Moblie D24 Location: Renton, WA boring Size: 8"/H5A I DES Project No.: 99141, RPT. 1 Drilled By: Gregory Drilling, Inc. Date Drilled: October 21, 1999 Logged Dy: R. A. Dergooist, PE Approximate Ground Surface Elevation: 19 feet L 5a mire 0V _ Rept r -- - � Le cr fGro�nr - 1 G . Vtieet} lum erana_ t � -- =—CT.A i a jg -- _ - E pi. _ — 1AU -- 14.4 — I _ Brown,Silty SAND with gravel, brokeen concrete, _ 255 5 11.5 bricks,and lumber(Fill) — I _5— 3SS 2 109.8 brown fine SAND(SP) 5_ _ O Hr. T._ I — Brown PEAT(PT) _ I Gray SILT(ML) 10_ 4SS 9 38.4 _10_ Gray to dark gray,fine SAND (5P) _ _15_ 555 4 -- _15 •_ III Gray SILT(ML) — 0 — Gray SANE)(OP) — 655 3 26.1 _20_ 67.6 Gray SILT(ML) — End of boring. _ _ — d 25 _25_ I A6 I 1 Berc list Engineering Services I I Log of Boring 4 I Project: Proposed Silver Dollar Casino Drill Rig: Mobile 1324 11 Location: Renton,WA Boring Size: 8/HSA 1 I BES Project No.: 99141, RPT. 1 Drilled By: Gregory Drilling, Inc. Date Drilled: October 21, 1999 Logged Sy: R. A. 5ergquist, PE Approximate Ground Surface Elevation: 20 feet 11 it rri-p(eu t v-o e e I De I -=.Ns7 F Qa c---A- --4140` FTrnSerc1ows illtfee ''- vr� e ; z .;. can . ._' _ M yt? = Fa _ 1AU -- 7.2 _ __ Brown,GRAVEL-SAND-SILT,broken concrete,trace I _5— 255 -- -- lumber(Fill) — 0 Hr. _5_ I355 11 73.9 brown GRAVEL-SAND-SILT(Fill) _ I 10— 455 3 92.5 Dark brown PEAT(PT) 10— • 40.2 _ 1 Gray SILT(ML) with interbedded — seams of fine sand — _15_ 555 4 32.1 _15_ _ — — III Black SAND(SF) _ 20_ 655 4 30.0 20_ 41.9 Gray SILT(ML) — End of boring. — _25— —25— A7 I l II 1 BORING LOG NOTES These notes and boring logs are intended for use with this geotechnical report for the Ipurposes and project described therein. The boring logs depict BES's interpretation of subsurface conditions at the location of the boring on the date noted. Subsurface conditions ' may vary, and groundwater levels may change because of seasonal or numerous other factors. Accordingly, the boring logs should not be made a part of construction plans or be used to define construction conditions. The approximate locations of the borings are shown on the Site Plan. The borings were located in the field by measuring from existing site features. Boring Size/Type" refers the diameter and type of auger used. "HSA" denotes hollow-stem auger. "SSA" denotes solid-stem auger. "BA" denotes bucket auger. "Sample Type" refers to the sampling method and equipment used during exploration where: • "AU" indicates a bulk sample taken from the ground surface or from the auger flights. • "SS" indicates split-spoon sampler with 1 -3/8" inside diameter and 2" outside diameter. ' • "DM" indicates Dames and Moore split-spoon sampler with 2-1/2" inside diameter and 3- 1/3" outside diameter. "Blows/Foot (N-Value)" refers to the number of blows from a 140-pound hammer falling 30 ' inches required to advance a standard sampler one-foot or a specified distance. Refusal is 50 blows for less than six inches or 25 blows without advancing the sampler. "WR" means that the sampler advanced due to the weight of the drill rods. "WH" means that the sampler ' advanced due to the weigh of the rods and hammer. "Moisture Content" refers to the moisture content of the soil expressed in percent by weight as ' determined in the laboratory. 'I "Description and Classification" refer to the materials encountered in the boring. The descriptions and classifications are generally based on visual examination in the field and laboratory. Where noted, laboratory tests were performed to determine the soil classification. ' The terms and symbols used in the boring logs are in general accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System. Laboratory tests are performed in general accordance with applicable procedures described by the American Society for Testing and Materials. I "7" Indicates location of groundwater at the time noted. ' A8 I I IBORING LOG NOTES continued ITERMS for RELATIVE DENSITY of NON-COHESIVE SOIL I Term Standard Penetration Resistance "N" Very Loose 4 or less Loose 5 to 10 IMedium Dense 11 to 30 Dense 31 to 50 Very Dense Over 50 blows/foot I I TERMS for RELATIVE CONSISTENCY of COHESIVE SOIL Term Unconfined Compressive Strength I Very Soft 0 to 0.25 tons/square-foot (tsf) Soft 0.25 to 0.50 tsf 1 Medium Stiff 0.50 to 1 .00 tsf I Stiff 1 .00 to 2.00 tsf 11 Very Stiff 2.00 to 4.00 tsf IHard Over 4.00 tsf • IDEFINITION of MATERIAL by DIAMETER of PARTICLE Boulder 8-inches+ ICobble 3 to 8 inches Gravel 3 inches to 5mm Coarse Sand 5mm to 0.6mm IMedium Sand 0.6mm to 0.2mm Fine Sand 0.2mm to 0.074mm ` I Silt 0.074mm to 0.005mm Clay less than 0.005mm ii I I IA9 1 11 I IUNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (USCS) COARSE GRAINED SOILS L (Less than 50%fines. Fines are soils passing the#200 sieve.) IGROUP SYMBOL DESCRIPTION MAJOR DIVISIONS GW Well-graded GRAVELS or GRAVEL-SAND mixtures, less than 5%fines. I GP Poorly graded GRAVELS or GRAVEL-SAND mixtures, less than 5%fines. GRAVELS Silty GRAVELS,GRAVEL-SAND-SILT mixtures,more More than half of coarse fraction is larger IGM than No.4 sieve. GC than 12%fines. Clayey GRAVELS,GRAVEL-SAND-SILT mixtures, more than 12%fines. I Well-graded SANDS or Gravelly SANDS mixtures, 5W less than 5%fines. 5P Poorly graded SANDS or Gravelly SANDS mixtures, I less than 5%fines. SANDS Silty SANDS, SAND-51LT mixtures,more than 12% More than half of coarse fraction is smaller 5M fines. than No.4 sieve. I SC Clayey SANDS, SAND-CLAY mixtures,more than 12'% fines Note:Coarse-grained soils receive dual symbols if they contain between 5 and 12 percent fines. I FINE-GRAINED SOILS (More than 50"/fines. Fines are materials passing the#200 sieve) 11 GROUP SYMBOL DESCRIPTION MAJOR DIVISIONS I ML Inorganic SILTS,very fine SANDS,ROCK FLOUR,Silty or Clayey SANDS Inorganic CLAYS of low to medium plasticity,Gravelly SILTS and CLAYS ICL CLAYS,Sandy CLAYS,Silty CLAYS,Lean CLAYS Liquid limit less than 50 OL Organic SILTS,or organic Silty CLAYS of low Iplasticity Inorganic SILTS,Micaceous or Diatomaceous fine MH SAND5 or SILTS,Elastic SILTS I SILTS and CLAYS CH Inorganic CLAYS of high plasticity,fat CLAYS Liquid limit greater than 50 OH Organic CLAYS of medium to high plasticity PT PEAT,MUCK,and other highly organic soils Highly organic soils ,i Note:Fine-grained soils receive dual symbols if their limits plot left of the"A"Line and have a plasticity index(PI)of 4 to 7 percent. UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM Bergquist Engineering Services 1 A10 JAE 'ER ENGINEERIT - 3 9419 S. 204 PLACE - KENT, WASHINGTON 98031 4 PHONE (253) 850-0934 Fax (253) 850-0155 June 12, 2002 1 DRAINAGE ANALYSIS AND TECHNICAL REPORT KOHL EXCAVATION CONSTRUCTION YARD PAVING 3330 EAST VALLEY ROAD RENTON, WA. PREPARED FOR: Ivan Christianson Kohl Excavating 3330 East Valley Road oEvc► of rpLA NN Renton, WA. 98055 M pN NG (425) 251-8820 SUN 2li 2002 1 RECEIVED PREPARED BY: 1 James J. Jaeger, P.E. 0 W ;. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. OVERVIEW II. DRAINAGE DATA SHEET III. OFFSITE DRAINAGE IV. PREDEVELOPED DRAINAGE V. DEVELOPED DRAINAGE VI. DETENTION POND DESIGN VII. CONVEYANCE SYSTEM VIII. EROSION CONTROL ji OVERVIEW The proposed project is a 4.13 acre parcel along the east side of East Valley Road, just south of the existing Imperials Bingo Hall. The existing property is currently being used as the office and construction yard for Kohl Excavating's field operations. Equipment and materials are stored and within the gravel surfaced yard. The site is zoned commercial arterial and is surrounded by other industrial uses. The rear or east property line is the State right-of-way line for SR 167. There is a large drainage ditch just within the State R.O.W. that runs all along the east side of the freeway. Full utilities are available within East Valley Road. Water service will be provided by the City of Renton. No additional sewer service is required. The site has existing water and sewer services. Permits applications are being prepared for a RV and boat storage yard within this entire site. This future storage facility will utilize metal coverings for approx. 66% of the site. These coverings will be set over the proposed asphalt pavement. The existing office will remain. The frontage road, East Valley Road, is fully improved with curb, gutter and sidewalk. No additional frontage improvements are proposed. The existing driveway curb cuts will remain. The entire gravel lot and driveways will be surfaced with asphalt. There are no trees on the existing site. There are a few cottonwood trees just east of the site along the freeway ditch. The existing site is covered with a thick, compacted gravel surface. This surface was necessary to support the construction equipment that had been using the site. An old aerial photo from March of 1974 of this site was obtained to confirm that the site was cleared and used a construction yard at that time. The site is basically flat. It is situated at an elevation of 20 ft. using City of Renton datum. There is a slight drop near the east property line into the ditch along the freeway. The site will not be graded except for the removal of an old preload fill that would have been used for a previous building application. The proposed drainage system will utilize onsite detention storage and biofiltration. The biofiltration swale will be located along the east property line and treat the drainage just before its discharge into the freeway ditch. A portion of the flows within the subject property line. This portion of the ditch will provide a discharge point for the site drainage without having to perform any construction on the State R.O.W. The drainage system will be designed based on the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual, with current updates. Page 1 of 2 King County Building and Land Development Division TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET PART 1 PROJECT OWNER AND PART 2 PROJECT LOCATION PROJECT ENGINEER AND DESCRIPTION Project Owner 1(014L. E...X CAN IaTl N G Project Name Ko H t_ N Address 3336 ESA. VALL��{ RD. RF--170p Location phv(Kt 6- Phone 42S- 2S 1- ef$2O 6DST Township 2-3►.i Project Engineer'Pr nES \JAEGER Range S Section se- 30 - Company tNF-F.IzlN6, Project Size 4.)3 Address Phone 'KW? S. 2£ PL.,le vet'1 'NAM Upstream Drainage Basin Size d AC PART 3 TYPE OF PERMIT APPLICATION PART 4 OTHER PERMITS I I Subdivision I I DOF/G HPA 0 Shoreline Management I1 Short Subdivision I I COE 404 k. Rockery .1 Grading I I DOE Dam Safety I I Structural Vaults• Commercial I I FEMA Floodplaln Li Other I Other I I COE Wetlands I I HPA PART 5 SITE COMMUNITY AND DRAINAGE BASIN Community C T1 OF R-frot Drainage Basin Low C� R1vR (SPRIK/GeRsoote- CREEK) PART 6 SITE CHARACTERISTICS FT River 0 Floodplain - 0 Stream I I Wetlands I I Critical Stream Reach I I Seeps/Springs - I I Depressions/Swales rl High Groundwater Table [ 1 Lake - 1-1 Groundwater Recharge I 1 Steep Slopes _ (1 Other 0 Lakeside/Erosion Hazard PART 7:SOILS Soil Type Slopes Erosion Potential Erosive Velocities FPS I Additional Sheets Attatched 1/90 b • Page 2 of 2 King County Building and Land Development Division TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET •ART 8 DEVELOPMENT LIMITATIONS , REFERENCE LIMITATION/SITE CONSTRAINT • I I Ch.4-Downstream Analysis I ,1 ; Pts ID t=*2eW0.1 If>11,11 f I - - 1 1 [ [ I Additional Sheets Attatched ' PART 9 ESC REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS DURING CONSTRUCTION FOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION I Sedimentation Facilities Stabilize Exposed Surface ,KT- Stabilized Construction Entrance ,[ cr Remove and Restore Temporary ESC Facilities Perimeter Runoff Control 11- Clean and Remove All Silt and Debris I I Clearing and Grading Restrictions Ensure Operation of Permanent Facilities Cover Practices [ I Rag Limits of NGPES (X Construction Sequence ri Other ®, Other SILT Fi .AwG •ART 10 SURFACE WATER SYSTEM Grass Lined Channel I I Tank I I Infiltration Method of Analysis .1%.:‹ Pipe System I ( Vault (—] Depression S B h H Open Channel I I Energy Dissapator I I Flow Dispersal Compensation/Mitigation I I Dry Pond I I Wetland Li Waiver of Eliminated Site Storage I I Wet Pond I I Stream Li Regional Detention NOn9` 1 Brief Description of System Operation C-0 Ilec o-n ty fa...30-0 _.--ori.0.0ce. 4 Ybo r J ` 1 _bt0s11. S pp . -11\ , de*e hm-, emd_ ra.\ bto 47--'0-le- Facility Related Site Limitations Ell Additional Sheets Attatched • Reference Facility Limitation PART 11 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS PART 12 EASEMENTS/TRACTS (May require special structural review) I I Drainage Easement I I Cast in Place Vault I I Other I J Access Easement Retaining Wall C] Native Growth Protection Easement —I Rockery>4'High [] Tract I I Structural on Steep Slope L] Other •ART 14 SIGNATURE OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER I or a civil engineer under my supervision have visited the site. Actual site conditions as observed were incorporated into this worksheet and the attatchments. To the best of my knowledge the information provided _ �i/ • ' �.:- �L here is accurate. .fY • . ••, 1/90 656 $EL ---- MAP - -A -- - — --- _— —_ 626 _ _.. ® - si, < M 11 AIYNnmu Y. tr _ ..,..,..,?,.,„,,v.,•' i 7: 1 1:4111: $ z Y <bl[fMfEMlu 'jJ / N l ` n #'� s ::I 3zl AIR vARF j�� f I MINDS �� .ii 1 MID.i Ant �N►41N sr Z ;s a°'"nwn • 111 a� ' .PL I �s. i 5 q a 1 4y:� 'Y im-n?y 1MN S'1 m t.� x - ► A� NE c �i;. i—��l:onlf�.1 gl�p � . ,f,� A elii lc- ST - • j `` `n 1 1E B V $ E '` / ,• / '}� r 7 rpm Pi• �� W r NI wow / Grp 1 0a5 $ r�. \c/ '�y7Nw' llll�gR 9 S f. 128TH S1 •• Z i'0 w RI a 1- MI it 4TH< z ST 19Q� / A� ST LLS ir HIINI . r.. 11•00 / z a PFylpy 11 s�4oTie 1 < w n AE lilt? 1 <���( ♦ s — ]111M5 5gI �1 9t _ T-A O RENTON f�lw �� wLrta„ — ; W :3: sr5i• • ST I g' 3-` S .31 TGDIN "a l6 '_ 11D0,��©� ',?� N tr 5 -� *.13`?TN i 1 ski 7 - RENTON= v, m !;)'> .Pp NT �� d 't g\.sw 1-•S'_ _A k_2No 18 cn < lP � ▪ _ / ortvEr Jil/ al,.. _s..iv 1 h` --`_ J = S 2N1 S wiigimpigJ� R CF[MR ,, eARx J CEMETERY s, �SE1A�IbL1W at 'LQ PL 100 90D ti mitt4 V1 RIYEIt - 'PARK hhik, Sii •t- I / A�A S 3RD f. 1 2 : ° ' \ • ' S a p .---.---,/ c KF900SSW SUN i� � % S � TH s SI � I IT4 ST ' I ' A77i ! _ .i * `ky • T1SE, eSTxC7 n FRE $►M ', S I =w d a �� � p �4fin . F „ ° •' A ,_ • s srN � N7„. y CENTER.......* N tIllt RENTON• ,gg — . IL VI SM_ i 71H Jy DI ©v bs"o enl $ E 1TH r 1'4 0I IV i /RIDE IWO� y �• •ENTON VILLAGE 10 ``�P .. • . 0SH - � I.1 "�' i ST Sr1 Q i .._ AN CENTER sr x 5� ' GATE�CPp �+ E I •104H_.. i GRp - 5- • S Rs TON VILLAGE PL `R R1i` — ,_.w-- -','- a 304 27H.,,.- HOL(LNY ��m INN L.0 4'.. 744E. - ,s„,_i_s2 --a:. 47_, imi 0 0 ________.ok‘10 - g. • ---1I gg Q a . ' S �NMI! �c 20 GATE Syj• 16TH 61z� ST p �• �o� s i I _ s S 16TH 5T �" G d 1y, ? SE I _ < -'> s ..�. il , � SE '16THG . m. m W OP �"'i � - .. Vier y .. R311 t;-1„ OK' g I C7 r ` ��I S 18TH 25 <sE ., , 'a SW 19TFI ST 19 ST , _ °'r s S 19 gT ��'y�t],�1 3 �94 ST N 'LL.I PANTHER N 0 I PL � ,"' •y7". M�' C gi _ xtp <1''Ln «�3 tag roL t�'• :;,. I CREEK <Nasl s < SN 215T ST ,n DD PUGET 4-C d eR,A'1 !� . 5 _?, G r C z15I S'� aC�B �. .-. hit CT'1 $T -.. �. I a G as 51�!1 57 "' SM 23kD S7 S 23RDnI ST _ tsE zNUA---- . _ `� t. ffG ww+ + r 2 MID I� k ;� . :$" J ffE! (J # R�If 'F Z 26= ■ IN 1 62NO<'I i _ II; y--� }- _.-11 G r < SW '27TH '--' .ti i sT t b sly S ti i S 27TH ST ., 1 4TH 1110ST — sT. S �p r iovor; W 5 Dlri "v p8TN,�.1,1. TSA-�7 - I S 29IN�,57<' ` w SE 165VTON i WETLAA[iS -T 1 PLCt. M ._.1661H SE t 2sn1 5I a'" vs Ti_..,$ $T 51 167TN SI Wr II 29TH ST S. Jy 5; , n N ei < 30 -� • Qc: CT Q M 1 $, .MEEK SEST ST S 1 < il • 1.; war ; $ SE169THLSE1691Hift • SW :iTM I -ST R ®3ATH ST$ J T. SE �0 172ND _- ST ' SE 72ND ST I f - �T ice. ....q(�lc� -- -I SF c RENTLW I .o CREEKNib S ` 1 N1$1 515 as 're 4' '. 74 N SN 1 .Zi 51'�S - ' SF 173NO SI_ (ST N , STH Liu- �TWYDS C Spl ST S >I 17An1 Sr__ 8; FS ��I "'ILR.7 J SW 3s,m Si 1„/ TUhDs1� y � \$�,y r SE 17SrHD 1 S 176TH. -- JOIN3 x 8 :;: SN e4` 41ST 5Ts1< s Ir. dI :I : ?inh1t !- SNEn _.0INPL.. e r P1 r>»E j= sEE\ 686..E,, • JIJI1-�_;-1'��zi 1,_• 'i 4 I l-IL C......h,HI lilt _ cal oU�� r',el; J �� ' - L /is ll9 t • % i ;� I11141 i �� %` LUMBER %% 2 MARKET t; —I 11 II 10 J tX 1 s,Y, 2 sr•'\ ) roN• Kl��rs"�s. ii,` I oi (3 1;1` 7 8 0,- de 0 l\ f a In IX 'A ; W. 30TN sr 4� 1 CRAIG TAYLOR Eou,Pwen yr co. F4--- 1% i72 ',vv. _z T /A'Y, N, • //.,. 0*.O. 3 illii 5- ' 40..... At ell 5_2) tli I% • SOUTH CND 1 Ai �,% - -- -,N Auto WRECKSNG lb 3 4 TH STREET _____--__4 ( ;% • 1ikk, t I io ivr. :� :: flee�•v✓ 1 III RED a wHIre 0. . , l :; 4 2 , 8 J n coNsr. co. go 5 . II f 4 461 1111Y— JONArnANS ;, ,� WARENOUsts j1� �J1rlt ,s� �\ 1 CO h er Wit 4 • tit k.Ieiv• Iv ;; #Agave. am itilen III f .� �� 2 .T PR. -osEO 4_4-'4 /73 •?�.v.< ► /1.37M1✓ r'�f/ is 67 lt:s �� 1 20 58 W S. .5 4- - • • aaaa. ass • h+ �K+ :! I. • I 20 4* N.N. A. }1asfin 95 NpSlin3g to ` . - t u 22 kl ' , , , r 5.80 Ac. 621 Ac105CAt. i 'rYy • !3 In r.1 fti Ai:.; t , \ 7- . Norman Gilmore l4l [. .. 0 - 0.46 At 3 Z7Ac e_: ?Lis -:-.-_:;---7("ZZol i !::-.1 ::: ® S.P. 187-78 -_ = :. ..., "IA\ ro: `n :111.4"se.tle 7 it too �1t S t� V,� . _g .. IT. Pelt it Delores ohl,� ( Fro9re55ive 1nvc3}mtnl Coat. 3lAer f.::. --I, ..7-1 - , IO84Ac '�1 t r:. ,\\ .. . f.: _• ' . : ....: __Io5Ac. Ja i-. ' r. �� cf s (� fj cFadden c "� J. Y. Farrell • ` ' A ~ Ei eft. V. Farrell i� - -. i .i. t:::: Ey q. ___ 6 A�. IJakanl5hi 1 I- S?UAc _ -' to I. 1`E j1°l • oL yi 1 or O A c -T t ''1-Y 3.3i A . 2 _ wQ+ rlcn+t. .n . ----171-------------: ' i III 1 .. :. ... I I -Th I I I I I! I 1'1 I I I ll 1 I 1 1 , II I M RC 11 , . _......14 11 SW 2h S 9tt 1 - s ,_ ri 1 II i I S6 iOth St. ; III11 ,. _. I I I I H 1 , i • --_ I 1 1 • -—"It--- ______ • .._._ I! tre 1, ___ ,. ,, ....._.. .. . ' . 1! , SW 34th St 1, I _ 7 ; i L.. .1w 341th t,.1 , 1 1 I li \ , J- Till- \ IH • / // \ / cc, •\,.// - . rzi ci) \/ IL -,z4 • h-T-1 'KV / / / •,•_, / ccs , r- >. F4 CLI th St. • _. -- --i-M u m ! . . / . \... .. C A ..\ Ma.. — 1 ' I M --/M SW 41st t. PII A 1 • i , 1 > Iv ' 1-3-▪ TALBOI46.4 • LIFT S 4611 2 Gk r v� 7 ti 5319 > 5 \ \, a au m .73eliwo J Co 3 t \ . I -12' 8,--------SW-27th-St----- , \f416-R **milieu, 021 1Co , \ \ 10 SW th St fa l I 1 -- -8'_ �_.B__ 3) i •2j- _ 11 2 ` Om' �_� 23 N PO. I �-�_I SW 30th St , i I (1016-' 1 I +24 Pilo I ; j I j• 1 0 3 i Imai. 0A25 N 1 SITE j I i O604 IS wI ' Ie7 8'I 0 I ' EAST VALLEY I b . .....i _-_- _ ___ _ 1LIFT)STATION 6,4 --' -.31— SW-34 th-St--------29 Ir10 I / 8' 3°- 6. . ) I•41 i toil lor w I •42 / 6. I / i • 0175 _ •.►-'�'-•43 I 1 CI 35 > 34 > ) h �, *' / 908 ' 907 CI 38 V 8' Q W 2 $07 I '_� 2 9COS 806 36 39 J I Oa 37 805 51� - 52 • 4 804 s 90S 55 1 . 04 CID lig !.C.fill 70* CID . ; ii ct u 11 01 i4 ,e \-, 1.01. li 1 / ..% -•.. IX " I 5 i C-° / Z\D 8" § fib ill E.- EADr. -- O l : I co e --1C_/) R-tp ;7 ..., 1 • 17...) I!"- t . _Ind Av-! SW _ t .8. —...._10.....,,,,t... .-..-_....._....._....)- e,....._.4„._ ........... .4. 16:1..,_ ' 4.,...._......_ i .g. - ...w...,....;. 8 Li .......aug.4.3.g: '... 5••-• 1 , 8 ,... I -fo : 1-1•-..„, , 1 § 16" A 16" i ir ar 16„ i --lf lc i 24" is 1 I it. m... • ii • .,.. co_ ,....,. . 1_. N. 1 8 - \ A s . - " a i icz )D 1 1 ........... 10 81'1140. • 12" • ....... _.. *.•,_,_-Or. —1-4}1-55- _r-- 1 0" § ' ' k i El 12 -2 \ 1-6' r7: • . . apwilirit\D : • 14: .... s....,...5i? 0 gi •ea I . --,7 -.. 4 p, P • • : •..i_ C. 1 0" C-.- 1 L1 A ei- ..., j •,..1 s' 12" IS RI. a — _ - ' • c 8" 16 .:) •fia - '-• : C/) ono. * • • ...... . • • ....t. ...........1-------T7T'w7;wtl c•-•,- • •••I 14 „ot a es ,...., - icy • . _,... co. co_ ._ E Valley, Rd. a r*) .::. 4 t 12" 1 i$ 12" E a . .L. • — B... .......... ......._ 1 ..,_. . ..,, g:•• ___...*...... .... r ' j• _ . ..- 6... , 10.---...._..?...e- -.111, .2...41..._T.....4...-/, .- •-..1 ••• "0-- - / r___I 1 co •- 4 T z IMIPIKI'Ci C°. • CD § • a V .41,§ 7 • . ::::5•Ag„,...s.les. i".g..-1--'-.L--.:/----.....,........„.., .. . ......-- ....,,,..- t ..............., _.....,........ •-•............. ...............-- .-- -..... , ............._..„............., .................,..................„.....„.,....„ ••••••• ....w. -........,..,....„.,.....„..... . .......... . ----,44,-=.....-0,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,t,:::::`-if•-.;•::,,„,.......,::::,........?v:-.ybn....".i.,,,..x.•'''''''''''''''''' .'''''...e.:.4 .'''''''. ....• . ....- „..., I ' .........." .........''''''''",................ \--- 2 • Z/I a 0££S ....... .___. ta fi 1 I i r f. f f fii_Ii.i f U—I-J.1.L illiffiffifliff}i III. OFFSITE DRAINAGE A. UPSTREAM DRAINAGE The upstream drainage contribution to this site is negligible. This site and all of the surrounding properties are flat. They all have drainage systems or are graded so that they drain into either the frontage road on the west side or the freeway ditch on the east side. There are no pipes or ditches that discharge onto the site. Both the freeway and the frontage road have their own drainage systems the keep runoff from entering the site from the east or the west. In summary, there is no off-site drainage that enters this property. B. DOWNSTREAM DRAINAGE The drainage from the site will be discharged from the detention system into the biofiltration swale and then into the existing "finger" of the freeway drainage ditch that is at the northeast property corner. The freeway ditch parallels the SR 167 freeway within the west shoulder. It has several lateral ditches to the west that connect to the drainage system within East Valley Road. This on-site finger of the freeway ditch extends into the property and is within the site boundary. At this location along the freeway ditch, there is also a culvert entering the ditch from the east, from under the freeway. This culvert is identified as pipe #26,F6=8. The freeway ditch is approx. 8 ft. to 10 ft. wide and 5 ft. to 6 ft. deep. It is grass-lined and has stable sides. The ditch flows to the south for approx. 800 ft. and then turns west within one of the lateral ditches towards East Valley Road. This lateral ditch is approx. 500 ft. long and drains into a pipe and type 2 catch basin along the east side of East Valley Road, just north of SW 34th St. The piping then flows approx. 80 ft. to the north and intersects with SW 34th St. The drainage then turns west and flows within the piping along the north side of SW 34th St. for approx. 2200 ft. where it discharges into Springbrook Creek. Springbrook Creek runs to the north and to the east and drains into the Green River. The site is within the Lower Green River drainage basin. The system appears to be able to accommodate peak flows for most of the smaller event storms. There is a history of backwater occurring within the entire area during large event storms. The detention system for this site will restrict developed peak flows to the level of the peak predeveloped flows. There will be a 30% sizing factor within the detention pond as an added benefit to the downstream system. �... • 0 c-o3•9af �J 1 __�4� i i) i . ° ^11 -lam`-�1---_.� j/1 �`-ram>✓ �' r---;.,......7 ii.--. ,. ,.. , , :00v, i 1 ,. , , , • , ;/ - ) — t .. '/I, ii , , .._ ,_. c , 1 1-0'92-..--0 cz 0 Oc5.9 " V., • �r9a It .,4 , a 'Q t �d1--p,„(rgi C � � '1 L' ® . L� IMFo � ` r� • r ? Q i? : r'.11.9',I.. (......4/;_,34, l' — I , a Oj `�J O / a . --\„,....\./..,--; c 7,....7 i 7)...../„...\\..—ir,E.__-----, .1 .virr,i/ il Li j '---7. )) j \ -N-C- l.'' l p c cr9r_ lJ �_ , , , _______n ( - 1 '( C_Th t''' 41 J`?C---=`; ° )] c- "(----•"---- - i [ It' ,ffr1fT;L: I/ V 1 �C 9r9z. I ) .. ..... _� I n 1 9i • ç j I I Ik t ij 1 \ J1i c_l ( .11192 ci 8-9111ya j �1 i SUSI L-.1.rj• • ( it' 2 / i l '�- D Ti, cJ �ir I( �- €= am----, i Ilro /I i i )) ,j0c$Zict 1 hi 9 .y ' �., 1-90 9a LI I- I Z d i --, I • a-Llai,..N., ,.. j ,i) 1 1 ....----'..- 'J i 1 1z-st a. J_ o R) `h-!a•9a}S 41-0c AS 1,( I ) I1 I 9 cr9z I ' I' (� 94)92 t-t779a • V'}4 c-sls2I : : c%, • a-►ria �) L 10 d \ c-►Y9i l r `_--- /v1 t I ►J w 1 \ \,) 11-►l,= o V 1 i= 1 • 1 1 . .I. �_.,\I o 1 �-.t,a .I 9-►tsa II fl cam`-. o IL Jr'-►o u \ \? (% >,1 1 tAa ,r�'I �� I 1.�►d9aJ � 0 i \ ) ►a9a . '`!,,121-►t9.., C_►! I 'Ic-► 17—n w_ v p, ( _ _ _ i�} r - v - J a-►�9i 149a ►-► 9a. , r-.Z-4f-7-.,—1.1..)..) (.Ij\ '" " tii 1-►l92 /� _ c. - {f i— s ,,I !,I. ' . ,i., \ 1 () .._7,7__.)- ",I,'I//Ii",I) \ 61-0192 ii J) i t-q 1 -f a•crl d 1l r,;;l o1�ct '��f�. 1 \ , \,,, / re- ---r----, c .,-7--. ..........,:;s_-,c -,_7,-.1. - 1 i re, cTT t9a d i _ —till - 1 . . • i 1 • . . • ‘11 (( CT NI --iss-R This document is a pi- guaranteed to sury a( 1 F LOQD FL I's-1 1•1, city purposes only nd information available a s This material is owned a The City of ‘_;‘,.....rdji .•:--/,,, •. N ./ -Ez '' " •.• fter" —i --‘1" 4 4 '' th4 , rn Nk > ...,_. 0 1 -... ----,.... ...-----,...-,. .... *-----.•-, _, v, . 4,> ,3 . -: .. •-• , '1) •dle . c,-;•- - • •••• cD :: ' .,.;:wg:i*i:i:,1*i:i*:::ii:i:..,*i:iiiiiiiiim.,..... ,ii.i;lii, .: .:e ./..!. : ....,,„„),_.. • ...: _, . , Aihigait \ . .41. ,, ,:.::,:„.::::„.:,.:.:,.......,.....:.:.,.....:„...1:::„:„...,.:.;.: —r--- - •:,:.:•::::::%:::•::::::.::::::::::::::::::::::::•::::::::::%::::$:::1:•::1::::::N: ../., :::::::::::::::::::::::•:•:•:.:•:.:.:•:.:•:.:.:•:•:•:...:•:.:•:.:—:•:•:•:•:4•:.:.• . k..: '. . :;. ,,,,.,.:O.W1 V.,:v>,.*:. .$•• :::,.............:Vo:•:.1:•:.:•:.:•:•:•:•:•:•:.:.:•:•$:•:.:•••:•%., ' . .. 'is ::::::::::::::::::::4•:.*:•:...:•:.:•:::::I:Tr:"'''''.k.••••••• c ::) • . .\ i41....,'. . .i..r.:; .:^. .;ii ii1offar . ',.s,qR- 24p g sy, :., A .,::: ::: ::! *ii:::itii''' 1. :::::i::,:*:,,,X,':.1::•:•:•:.I.N.:•:.:.:.:.:.:•:•:•:•:•;•:.:4.1.:, ,,. ............. jAti,E^EAST RD . '')..N. :-:.' ' tAtiji . -- C1 qf).;.•.>. 2.4.ilvt., 7:i,,ii4iiiiiiiiiii:iiiiiigiri,i*iiii:i:i:i:i,:i*i:i: ,...... ...,..... .....,.„,...,.........„........... t .:: '':;..:': : 1': ::'; .:: :: .::::.:::'...:.: :. 1.......4 ...•011 ...........ruspeonalaii ' :. I iliiiNiiniii:IiiMg::? ,*:::i::::::::::::::.00i::i...1..:. = SI k WIPP' ..... 411114.161MIIMI OM miipAININIMM wan a ra ,,:::;;;'::::•.;::,:yiyi:.::.;.:.::.:1:,:i:,::::::. ./..... 111111116 ..',....:::!:.:%,,,iiii1:11:11iiii:• :.• ...:•:•:•:.::!... .., ... .....• ill11011. BENSON HWY ...P4' ftabWi •••••"--- ....7. . •-...... ., ...---- ,J • rr-1.- ,...., , , .1' 1111111111111111111.MONDS AVE ..): ( 116th AVE 41-. / , bil 4'4, b 1 •R, 9 1.11, NU ••••4°- L .•. . °' 140th AVE SE t. l 01.1VALL AV WE I r. i 4 409 o a 1 ;4' -17 „. I 0 •,: iiiio o NO All :;;•• r9 .........:::::tiii. ......:iii:li:iii:!:i:::!i:0:$.: •:!::,:!: . ..!:.!:::, , e..:4:•::•!:•:•:•:•::k:•••„,:•:.:•:%•:•::,:.:•::•:•s:.:. k:. o .1::':::$411!i•R:r::.ii:.....-...4:.•,:;::,::;;;;;;I:::::::::.:!.:i::.::.:1::.:.:::!•,::•:...:q... /fri / / Ill i.:.::::.,*:*.ii,li::.:•ilii.i.i. :,*.,,,........ .(,, i 'il .:;:::::sii, i • a V . .. ,.;:giiiiii$Piiiili• . .1 tl ff. iiiiiir ,tc ,,,, ,•••• •• . t •- . _tc : * .Niiiii1`. 'Q • i \--__7 -- ' `10• • .... •" 44 in. ,.....--- ,••• , /.' isr, -.. :::: .:::• IV. PREDEVELOPED DRAINAGE The existing site is a gravel surfaced construction yard. There is a small office building on the site and several small concrete slabs. The site has been used for many years (30+) as a construction yard. Over the years, numerous layers of gravel have been placed and replaced on the site and compacted by the construction vehicle traffic. This has occurred over the entire site. I have obtained an old aerial photo from March of 1974 that shows the site being used as a construction yard. There were no trees or landscaping on the site at that time nor is there any now. The existing runoff from the west half of the site flows into existing catch basins within the gravel yard. It is then piped into the drainage system within East Valley Road. The drainage from the east half of the site sheet flows to the east and into the freeway ditch. The site is extremely flat. The erosion control plan shows the existing catch basin locations and the existing topography of the site. The existing drainage analysis was performed using the "Waterworks" hydrology software and its summary tables and charts are attached for reference. The methods outlined in the King County Surface Water Drainage Manual were used as guidelines. Following this page are the data sheets used for the computer input data. The computer summary sheets for peak flow and time of concentration calculations are also attached. Below is a brief description of the existingdrainage p 9 characteristics: Time of concentration: 13.77 minutes 2 year peak flow: 1.00 CFS 10 year peak flow: 1.74 CFS 100 year peak flow: 2.59 CFS total area: 4.13 acres pervious area: 3.88 acres curve number: 91 impervious area: 0.25 acres curve number: 98 5/ 8/02 Jaeger Engineering page 1 KOHL RV AND BOAT STORAGE DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS PREDEVELOPED HYDROGRAPH SUMMARIES BASIN SUMMARY , BASIN ID: A10 NAME: PREDEVELOPED, 10 YEAR SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 4 . 13 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE TYPE1A PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION • 2 . 90 inches AREA. . : 3 . 88 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10 . 00 min CN • 91 . 00 TIME OF CONC • 13 . 77 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 AREA. . : 0 .25 Acres CN • 98 . 00 PEAK RATE: 1 . 74 cfs VOL: 0 . 70 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min �I BASIN ID: A100 NAME: PREDEVELOPED, 100 YEAR SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 4 . 13 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs f RAINFALL TYPE TYPE1A PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION • 3 . 90 inches AREA. . : 3 . 88 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 . 00 min CN • 91 . 00 TIME OF CONC • 13 . 77 min IMPERVIOUS AREA # ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 . 20 AREA. . : 0 .25 Acres CN • 98 . 00 PEAK RATE : 2 .59 cfs VOL: 1 . 02 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min } PREDEVELOPED,ID: A2 NAME: 2 YEAR SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 4 . 13 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE TYPE1A PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION • 2 . 00 inches AREA. . : 3 . 88 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 . 00 min CN • 91 . 00 TIME OF CONC • 13 . 77 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 AREA. . : 0 .25 Acres ' CN • 98 . 00 PEAK RATE: 1 . 00 ' cfs VOL: 0 .41 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min ii E.- tDRAr!Ks NC-"t` - R L) e.Nrk- - a.orGeCUrect. "S 2 S t - ct ert-e-1 o p met• c e� ., "L.fi w(j( n o'�' rwec-2 ss `�U t v\ ��e. —4n ern rinexj V� �1-s cure-- f 1 �Ttrec� 5483 .0(6 5a-I.R )( 3 Z-ct , 43 t 3 3c9 .3'L Z 2 54--5 ,0 4 ( 329r •dd4,� ci ca S . cvR\t err ' 11 . 2 cr'- Sl'�e- Sbk S co V re- r D c31--v-• I v 1 `U r) QS , r by 4 e USDA So.! v o n Se4rvt s - .� haz c V rvoz_b(e_ \Nic roles G -�o up . FE;r +In,s (k " � �©o s L u �� p t,e.�� (, ek ssc eeY 2 . 7.rn9ervioos .sU r cm.r.c , sik s o-'t c.e.. = Z 5 v± LQ(e O -I- ► e03 SF 10-i3(0 .5i== 0. 2_s . 3 . FeArvIous ``Ins s\'1-"e has )4eer. Vse �' �'`' t rniaAn S{-c I \cce.rc.Q ro r 6 ve-Vr 3o 7 9-s 0\ Does-Lct_A h > S ems„ -vim 41A i s o g s fe t-F C. 'L 0LN\ '\'h<Z 2.-Xn hre.. . rem = 4 , 13 Inc. / C _ `� I 1c S� _ vO/�.sZ b s� -f L. C MO-f� t f k Z _ u'd '2 \tii Q' Z _ 2(3- 't S-l\-,i I n C4f;reria 4,0 4_w_.,,4- ay. e-o aas S a U W L L Qc2 s, .1 - $,, - 12 : ac4-0(S �Cncvr c j. 1) 14. I 0 ? »-zs4QQ-J File Basin Hydrograp Storage Discharge Le pool 3 5 SHEET FLOW CALCULATOR - INITIAL 300 FEET DES Mannings Sheet Flow • 0.0600 ARE Flow Length (ft) • 230.00 iG HOICES RAI 2 yr 24 hr rainfall ( in) : 2.00 TIM Land Slope ( ft/ft) • 0. 0130 TIM COMPUTED TRAVEL TIME (min) :( 13. 77 RAI TYPICAL MANNINGS VALUES FOR INITIAL 300 FT A ABS BAS Smooth Surfaces • 0.011 STO Fallow Fields of Loose Soil Surface • 0.05 Y Cultivated Soil with residue cover (s<=0.2 ft/ft) : 0.06 PER Cultivated Soil with residue cover (s>0.2 ft/ft) . : 0. 17 ARE Short prairie grass and lawns - • 0. 15 CN Dense grasses • 0.24 Bermuda grass • 0.41 Range (natural) • 0. 13 PEA Woods or forest with light underbrush • 0.40 PEA Woods or forest with dense underbrush • 0.80 TOT FlOKey: QUIT F5Key: CLEAR Jete Pgl lit I PRE-ID t van , OF CO►.I c 1 114. 0 K! V. DEVELOPED DRAINAGE The drainage from the developed site will collect on the asphalt parking area or on the roof of the future new buildings. It will then be directed into catch basins placed throughout the site. The catch basins will be piped into the detention pond, located along the east property line. The proposed detention pond will be an open pond with retaining walls on the sides. The pond will discharge into the biofiltration swale, also along the east property line. The biofiltration swale will discharge directly into the ditch along the east side of the freeway. The detention pond will be sized based on the standard detention requirements for the City. The pond flow restrictor will release the pond discharge at a rate not to exceed the 2 year predeveloped peak flow while retaining the 2 year developed peak flow. This is the same for the 10 year and 100 year peak flows. A 30% additional volume factor of safety is added to the detention pond design volume. The biofiltration swale will be sized to treat the 2 year predeveloped peak flow. Similar to the existing condition, the SBUH hydrograph method was used to determine the peak flows for the various storm events. A level pool analysis was performed to evaluate the pond performance during the various required scenarios. The computer data sheets for the developed flows follow this page as well as the works sheets and the time of concentration calculations. A brief summary of the developed drainage characteristics are: time of concentration: 6.30 minutes 2 year peak flow: 1.58 CFS 10 year peak flow: 2.38 CFS 100 year peak flow: 3.27 CFS total area: 4.13 acres pervious area: 0.51 acres curve number: 90 impervious area: 3.62 acres curve number: 98 �i DEN E01=> DRf13-1 1 1 rat . PRE! e_ s te.- cur-ems w l\i c.J,E, s YTS soome._ u c r u seA -fir- -e-- �r�e- X e,( area_ o.. -t s. Arrea._ 4. l3 c,. C.A.) R\ - tomeRS ( , SE).(` �' e. Urb�� (u .kr Z . e�r-�t co os sU r �.�; 9 a� �3 QC9csorcD Sm.Q..xu-c(ars', Si x .50f)` = I 57 g3> .s1= = 3.(p z b) Pexviovs 4 , i3 - S.(02- = o, S 1 P}c.- C 1`M e OT eN\C Uv1t` -10 Ose L . 3 'Mt fie s c o-,sn M k Y m T Y 04_ �Te p l, .�spPuuv Pt Ls I = 2.c7 \r Pio io = Z i n 3 Pb - 3, 9 t . Pam... I , � ; Ss S 2 0,0 _ Z .35 Crs 3 00 3,2:1 5/ 8/02 Jaeger Engineering page 1 KOHL RV AND BOAT STORAGE DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS DEVELOPED HYDROGRAPH SUMMARIES BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: B10 NAME : DEVELOPED, 10 YEAR SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 4 . 13 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE TYPE1A PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION • 2 . 90 inches AREA. . : 0 . 51 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 . 00 min CN • 90 . 00 • TIME OF CONC • 6 . 30 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 . 20 AREA. . : 3 . 62 Acres CN • 98 . 00 PEAK RATE: 2 .38 cfs VOL: 0 . 89 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min BASIN ID: B100 NAME : DEVELOPED, 100 YEAR SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 4 . 13 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE TYPE1A PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION • 3 . 90 inches AREA. . : 0 .51 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 . 00 min CN • 90 . 00 TIME OF CONC • 6 .30 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 AREA. . : 3 . 62 Acres CN • 98 . 00 PEAK RATE: 3 .27 cfs VOL: 1 . 23 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min BASIN ID: B2 NAME: DEVELOPED, 2 YEAR SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 4 . 13 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE TYPE1A PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION • 2 .00 inches AREA. . : 0 . 51 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 . 00 min CN • 90 . 00 TIME OF CONC • 6 . 30 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 . 20 AREA. . : 3 . 62 Acres CN • 98 . 00 PEAK RATE: 1 . 58 cfs VOL: 0 . 58 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min File Basin Hydrograph Storage Discharge Level pool ; 3eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee ; o MULTIPLE ORIFICE ° o DISCHARGE STRUCTURE ID: 1 ° O 0 °Name: FLOW RESTRICTOR ° °Peak Dsgn Release Rate : 2 . 59 cfs Orif /flow/elev ° °Orifice Coefficient . . . : 0 . 62 Dia (in) /cfs/ ft ° °Lowest Orifice Dia (in) . . : 5 . 25 5 . 25 1 .45 cfs ° °hl : Outlet to 2nd Orifice: 1 . 80 16 . 80 ft ° °Second Orifice Dia (in) . . : 4 . 00 4 . 00 0 . 61 cfs ° , °h2 : 2nd to 3rd Orifice. . . : 1 . 10 17 . 90 ft ° °Third Orifice Dia (in) . . : 4 . 63 4 . 63 0 .54 cfs ° °h3 : 3rd to 4th Orifice. . . : 0 . 00 ° °Fourth Orifice Dia (in) . . : 0 . 00 0 °h4 : 4th to 5th Orifice. . . : 0 . 00 0 °Top Orifice Dia (in) . . : 0 . 00 0 ; o 0 °Elevation of Lowest Orifice • 13 . 00 ° °Outlet Elevation • 15 . 00 ° °Max Elev Above Outlet • 18 . 75 ° °Stage-Disch Increment • 0 . 10 ° o 0 Av°PGUP PGDN F3 : Get F6 : Delete F10 : Exit 0 Cuaeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeef 11 File Basin Hydrograph Storage Discharge Level pool il J2eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee; ° 0 II °Rectangular vault 0 °Trapezoidal basin ° °Underground pipe 0 °Sto list ° 3eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee; ° o RECTANGULAR VAULT ° 0 o STORAGE STRUCTURE ID: 1 0 0 o Of °Name. : DETENTION POND 0 °Length (ft) 92 . 00 0 °Width (ft) • 12 . 00 , .,, ° °Starting Elevation. : 15 . 00 ° °Max Elev of Vault . . : 19 . 00 ° °Stage-Sto Increment : 0 . 10 °Structure Vol (cf) . : 4416 . 00 o Ac-ft . : 0 . 10 0 o 0 °PGUP PGDN F3 : Get F6 : Delete F10 : Exit ° aeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeef Available Memory remaining: 204008 bytes Current Data Set Name : \KOHLRV.bsn De,,f'Ph+1 v`r1 Pcr\c) (.1 C) l a -ed .D._s 142.4\ : 9 2'1 MC, 3o% s z, v1 -g, r-, I , 30 2�= I lc? ,(o L)s�. 1�' (` 06 I 1 File Basin Hydrograph Storage Discharge Level pool J2eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeI r ° 0 °Rectangular vault ° il °Trapezoidal basin ° °Underground pipe °Sto list ° 1 3eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee; ° o RECTANGULAR VAULT ° ° o STORAGE STRUCTURE ID: 1 ° 0 I o °eeeeef °Name . : DETENTION POND ° •°Length (ft) 92 . 00 ° °Width (ft) • 12 . 00 ° °Starting Elevation. : 15 . 00 0 °Max Elev of Vault . . : 18 . 75 0 °Stage-Sto Increment : 0 . 10 ° °Structure Vol (cf) . : 4140 . 00 ° !i o Ac-ft . : 0 . 10 ° �! O ° i °PGUP PGDN F3 : Get F6 : Delete F10 : Exit ° a1 aeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeef 1 Available Memory remaining: 204008 bytes Current Data Set Name: \KOHLRV.bsn File Basin Hydrograph Storage Discharge Level pool Jaeger Engineering 2eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee ; 3eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee; o ROUTING COMPARISON TABLE ° o MATCH INFLOW STO DIS PEAK PEAK OUT 0 o DESCRIPTION PEAK PEAK No. No. STG OUT HYD ° ' O ° °2 YEAR EVENT 1 . 00 1 .58 1 1 16 . 77 0 . 99 11 ° ' °10 YEAR EVENT 1 . 74 2 .38 1 1 17 . 82 1 . 69 12 0 °100 YEAR EVENT • 2 . 59 3 .27 1 1 18 . 75 2 .59 13 0 O 0 O ° O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 aeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeef ' Available Memory remaining: 204008 bytes Current Data Set Name: \KOHLRV.bsn 5/ 8/02 Jaeger Engineering page 1 KOHL RV AND BOAT STORAGE DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS LEVEL POOL ANALYSIS SUMMARY LEVEL POOL TABLE SUMMARY MATCH INFLOW ST DI <-PEAK-> STORAGE < DESCRIPTION > (cfs) (cfs) id id <-STAGE> id VOL (cf) II 11 2 YEAR EVENT 1 . 00 1 .58 1 1 16 . 77 11 1951 . 35 10 YEAR EVENT 1 . 74 2 . 38 1 1 17 . 82 12 3114 . 67 i 100 YEAR EVENT 2 .59 3 . 27 1 1 18 . 75 13 4137 .41 • Trapezoidal Channel Analysis & Design Open Channel - Uniform flow Worksheet Name : KOHL RV STORAGE Comment :jBIOFILTRATION SWALE - 2 YEAR DESIGN STORM Solve For Bottom Width Given Input Data: Left Side Slope 3 . 00 : 1 (H:V) Right Side Slope 3 . 00 : 1 (H:V) Manning' s n 0 .350 Channel Slope 0 . 0200 ft/ft Depth 0 . 67 ft I, Discharge 0 . 99 cfs — 2.- ,Tr . k3 C 1 Computed Results : 52, Bottom Width. . . . 2 . 25 ft Velocity 0 .35 fps �� �� 1 Flow Area 2 . 85 sf ,,_�Flow Top Width 6 .27 ft I /'_____,Flow Wetted Perimeter. 6 .48 ft 1 / Critical Depth 0 . 17 ft J Critical Slope 3 .4994 ft/ft / Froude Number 0 . 09 (flow is Subcritical) / , .1\4101 - wka7- , - D\e- toot i 2_� L0.2� = 2. . Sc-- no Use- tz 60 v*He) 1 1 1 Open Channel Flow Module, Version 3 . 12 (c) 1990 Haestad Methods, Inc. * 37 Brookside Rd * Waterbur Trapezoidal Channel Analysis & Design Open Channel - Uniform flow Worksheet Name: KOHL RV STORAGE Comment :CiIOFILTRATION SWALE - 100 YEAR CAPACITY Solve For Depth Given Input Data: Bottom Width 8 .50 ft Left Side Slope 3 . 00 : 1 (H:V) Right Side Slope 3 .00 : 1 (H:V) Manning' s n 0 .030 I Channel Slope 0 . 0020 ft/ft i' Discharge 3 .27 cfs 11 I Computed Results : it Depth 0 .34 ft Velocity 1 . 00 fps 1 Flow Area 3 .26 sf Flow Top Width 10 .55 ft Wetted Perimeter 10 . 66 ft Critical Depth 0 . 16 ft I Critical Slope 0 . 0246 ft/ft Froude Number 0 . 32 (flow is Subcritical) I I I n j c_otax.__Aj•N( CX.vN) � j 10 I ,oD F P <_ Z 0 �1 s k - l , o 6---f)k(-1) 1 piDL)_) ckoc ii-, ---- 0 , 34- � t � ' Co�Y I I Open Channel Flow Module, Version 3 . 12 (c) 1990 Haestad Methods, Inc . * 37 Brookside Rd * Waterbury, Ct 06 j. VII. CONVEYANCE SYSTEM The drainage piping was sized to accommodate the 100 year developed flows as identified in the developed drainage section of the report. All of the conveyance piping will be 12" diameter CPEP pipe. This pipe is the corrugated polyethylene pipe, double-walled, smooth interior, such as ADS N 12 or equal. Piping within the front portion of the site will have a minimum slope of 0.5%. The piping in the rear of the site will have a minimum slope of 1.0%. The front piping will collect a little less than 50% of the site drainage. The front area is 390 ft. long compared to the 542 ft. property length. This is 72% of the site area. The corresponding peak 100 year flow for this area is (.75)(3.61)=2.71 CFS. The piping that will carry this front parking lot flow is from CB #3 to CB #2. The slope of the 12 CPEP pipe is 0.5%. At this slope, the capacity of the pipe is 2.73 CFS (refer to the following computer summary sheet). The minimum slope of the pipes in the rear (east) portion of the site may carry the entire site flow. The 100 year flow for the entire site is 3.61 CFS. The pipes in this area have a minimum slope of 1.0%. The capacity of the 12" CPEP at 1 .0% is 3.86 CFS. This is greater than the 3.61 CFS. Thus, all of the pipes can handle the 100 year developed drainage flow from the site. Circular Channel Analysis & Design Solved with Manning' s Equation Open Channel - Uniform flow Worksheet Name : Comment : , I Solve For Full Flow Capacity Given Input Data: Diameter 1 00 ft Slope 0 . 0050`ft/ft Manning' s n 0 . 012 Discharge 2 . 73 cfs _ I Computed Results : Full Flow Capacity 2 . 73 cfs Full Flow Depth 1 . 00 ft Velocity 3 . 47 fps Flow Area 0 . 79 sf Critical Depth 0 . 71 ft Critical Slope 0 . 0069 ft/ft Percent Full 100 . 00 a Full Capacity 2 . 73 cfs QMAX @. 94D 2 . 94 cfs Froude Number FULL Open Channel Flow Module, Version 3 . 12 (c) 1990 Haestad Methods, Inc . * 37 Brookside Rd * Waterbury, Ct 06708 • Circular Channel Analysis & Design Solved with Manning' s Equation . � Open Channel - Uniform flow Worksheet Name : Comment : Solve For Full Flow Capacity Given Input Data : . —� Diameter 1 . 00 ftJ Slope �b . 0100 ft/f> Manning' s n 0 . 012 — Discharge 3 . 86 cfs Computed Results : Full Flow Capacity 3 . 86 cfs Full Flow Depth 1 . 00 ft Velocity 4 . 91 fps Flow Area 0 . 79 sf Critical Depth 0 . 84 ft Critical Slope 0 . 0097 ft/ft Percent Full 100 . 00 0 Full Capacity 3 . 86 cfs QMAX @. 94D 4 . 15 cfs Froude Number FULL i I Open Channel Flow Module, Version 3 . 12 (c) 1990 Haestad Methods, Inc . * 37 Brookside Rd * Waterbury, Ct 06708 VIII. EROSION CONTROL SYSTEM This site is extremely flat along with the surrounding properties. There will be no grading involved with the development of this site. The only grading will be the removal of the pre-load fill within the old building site footprint. Thus, the potential for any erosion is slight. The erosion control system was designed to eliminate any onsite runoff from entering the adjacent properties or right-of-way. In order to accomplish this, a silt fence will be installed. Because the site is so flat, perimeter or intermediate interceptor swales would not be practical. This site is not expected to generate any runoff from the site because it is so flat. The silt fencing will be placed only at the northeast corner, where the existing freeway ditch is nearby. No other property lines are susceptible to erosion. There is no clearing involved since the site has no existing vegetation. • V0/1J/LUNG 1J:Ji) 1't%A LUJOJUL! UJ V11 fi'1N1 VJ qy UVL • vV/10/LUUL 1L:4o rAA CHICAGO TITLE BELLEVUE 1-11 002 CI" ..t-»O TITLE INSURANCE C `... ANY 10500 NE STH,91700,fiE I.EWE,WA 98004 iJ A.L.TA.COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A Title Unit: ETU Phone: (425)646-9883 Fax (425)646-9879 Order No: 1009010 Officer. EASISIDE TITLE UNIT Your No.: DC PROPERTIES AMMWM Commitment Effective Date DUNE 7,2002 at 8:00 A./vL 1. Policy or Policies to be issued: ALTA Owner's Policy Amount: $0.0 0 1992 STANDARD Premium: BUILDER SALE - STANDARD RATE Tax Proposed Insured: Policy or Poficics to be issued: Amount: $0.o o ALTA Loan Policy Premium: 1992 EXTENDED TEIM SIMULTANEOUS LOAN RATE Proposed insured: Policy or Policies to be issued: Amount: $0.00 ALTA Loan Policy Premium: Tax: Proposed Insured: ? ate or interest m the land wbich is covered this Commitment is: z. The by PEE SIMPLE DEVELOPMENT PLANNING 3, Title to the estate or interest in the land is et the effective date hereof vested i CITY OF RENTON n: DC PROPERTIES, A WASHrNGTON LIMITED PARTNERSHIP JUN 2 7 2002 RECEIVED 4. The land referred to in this went is described as follows: SEE ATTACHED LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT AI vw Rnc'oaa&/tt►an/M99 JUN-13-2002 THU 01:33PM ID: PAGE:2 06/13/200Y 13:35 FAA 25385WI r5 U ! nr1i US UUs ��..� ic.co rna CHI CAGO TITLE BELLEVUE j003 � I - I CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA.COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A (Continued) Order No.: 1009010 Your NO_: DC PROPERTIES LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT (Paragraph 4 of Schedule A continuation) THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAME'1aE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING WEST OF THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY NO. 5, AS ESTABLISHED BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 5346368; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING WITHIN THE RIGHT OF WAY FOR EAST VALLEY HI GHWAY. CLTAL:MM/RL1A/0999 _TI IM-17-21 2 TI-II1 Gil -?-ZPM Tfi! oor_r.7 06/13/2002 13:35 FAA 2o3t t do oil ntni 119UV4 BELLEVUE CHICAGO TITLE tc.ca rn1► �0O4 CI-HCAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY ILL.TA.COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B OrderNo.: 1009010 Your No DC PROPERTIES Schedule B of the policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following matters unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company. GENERAL EXCEk rIONS A_ Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. B. Encroachments,overlaps,boundary line disputes,or other matters whichwould be disclosed by an accurate survey and inspection of the premises. C. Easements,or claims of easements,not shown by the public records. D.Any lien,or right to a lien,for contributions to employee benefit funds,or for state workers' compensation,or for serviced,labor,or material heretofore or hereafter furnished,all as imposed by law, and not shown by the public records. E. Taxes or special assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the public records. F. Any service,installation,connection,maintenance,tap,capacity or contraction charges for sewer,water, electricity,other utilities,or garbage collection and disposal. G.Reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; Tndian tribal codes or regulations,Indian treaty or aboriginal rights,including easements or equitable servitudes. H. Water rights,claims,or title to water. I. Defects,liens,encumbrances,adverse claims or other matters,if any,created,first appearing in the public records,or attaching subsequent to the effective date bereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires of record fox value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS FOLLOW amosL I I THM-17- RM Tlal l M1 .77PM Tf PAfF:4 06/13/2002 13:36 FAA Lb3800U-lib Ull ALN1 La LEI UV° - ice.�a rear CHICAGO TITLE BELLFVUE 1005 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A_L.TA.COMMITMENT l SCHEDULE B (Continued) OrderNo.: 001009010 '! Your NO.: DC PROPERTIES SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS A 1. COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS CONTAINED IN INSTRUMENT: RECORDED: FEBRUARY 15, 1979 RECORDING NUMSER1 7902151017 • 2. RELINQUISHMENT OF ACCESS TO STATE HIGHWAY NUMBER 5 (SR 167) AND OF LIGHT, VIEW AND AIR BY DEED TO THE STATE OF WASHINGTON: RECORDED: OCTOBER 27, 1961 RECORDING NUMBER: 5346368 • 3. PAYMENT OF THE REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX, IF REQUIRED. THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SITUATED WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF LOCAL TAXING AUTHORITY OF CITY OF RENTON. PRESENT RATE IS 1.78%. ANY CONVEYANCE DOCUMENT MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY THE OFFICIAL WASHINGTON STATE EXCISE TAX AFFIDAVIT. THE APPLICABLE EXCISE TAX MUST BE PAID AND THE AFFIDAVIT APPROVED AT THE TIME OF THE RECORDING OF THE CONVEYANCE DOCUMENTS, • 4_ GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT I ' FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YV R (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES) : YEAR: 2002 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 302305-9090-04 LEVY CODE: 2110 ASSESSED VALUE-LAND: $ 1,116,000.00 ASSESSED VALUE-IMPROVEMENTS: $ 14,700.00 GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES: BILLED: $ 13,127.63 PAID: $ 6,563 .82 UNPAID: $ 6,563.81 CLTAA'.sal/RDAjm99 MN-17-PM? THII A1 :7s4PM ID: PAr,F:5 II Uti/13/ZUUZ 13:3ti 1AA Z5360b8110 1;11 RLr 1 ( LpjUUb CHICAGO TITLE BELLEVUE E1006 I CHICAGO IDLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.T.A.COMMITMENT SCIEDULE B (Continued) Order N o� 1009010 YYourNo_: DC PROPERTIES SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS • 5. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT FOR DC PROPERTIES, A WASHINGTON LIMITED PARTNERSHIP. ✓ NOTE: A COPY OF THE PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT, AND AMENDMENTS THERETO, IF ANY, MUST BE SUBMITTED. • 6. ANY CONVEYANCE OR MORTGAGE BY DC PROPERTIES, A WASHINGTON LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, MUST BE EXECUTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT AND BY ALL THE GENERAL PARTNERS AND THEIR RESPECTIVE SPOUSES AS OF THE DATE OF ACQUISITION, OR EVIDENCE MUST BE SUBMITTED THAT CERTAIN DESIGNATED PARTNERS HAVE BEEN AUTHORIZED TO ACT FOR THE PARTNERSHIP, s 7. TITLE IS TO BE VESTED IN PERSONS NOT YET REVEALED AND WHEN SO VESTED WILL BE SUBJECT TO MA_L-I RS DISCLOSED BY A SEARCH OP THE RECORDS AGAINST THEIR NAMES. • 8 _ TO PROVIDE AN EXTENDED COVERAGE LENDER'S POLICY GENERAL EXCEPTIONS A THROUGH D WILL BE CONSIDERED WHEN OUR INSPECTION AND/OR REVIEW OF SURVEY, IF REQUIRED, IS COMPLETED_ A SUPPLEMENTAL COMMITMENT WILL FOLLOW. a 9_ ISSUANCE OF THE ADDITIONAL PROTECTION ENDORSEMENT FOR HOME OWNERS WILL BE CONSIDERED WHEN OUR INSPECTION OP THE PROPERTY IS COMPLETED. A SUPPLEMENTAL COMMITMENT WILL FOLLOW. NOTE 1; 1 THE LOAN POLICY TO BE ISSUED WILL CONTAIN THE ALTA 8.1 ENDORSEMENT. 1 L NOTE 2: EFFECTIVE JANUARY I, 1991, DOCCMENT FORMAT AND CONTENT REQUIREMENTS HAVE BEEN IMPOSED BY WASHINGTON LAW_ FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF THE DOCUMENT BY THE COUNTY RECORDER OR IMPOSITION OF A $50.00 SURCHARGE. FIRST PAGE OR COVER SHEET REQUIREMENTS: 3" TOP MARGIN CONTAINING NOTHING EXCEPT THE RETURN ADDRESS. 1" SIDE AND BOTTOM MARGINS CONTAINING NO MARKINGS OR SEALS. 1 TITLE(S) OF DOCUMENTS. RECORDING NO. OF ANY ASSIGNED, RELEASED OR REFERENCED DOCUMENT(S) . GRANTORS NAMES (AND PAGE NO. WHERE ADDITIONAL NAMES CAN BE FOUND) . GRANTEES NAMES (AND PAGE NO_ WHERE ADDITIONAL NAMES CAN BE FOUND) . cr.TACMD2/RaA/r JUN-13-2002 THU 01:34PM ID: PAGF_:6 UU/1J/LUUL 1J JI 1'AA LJJV JVJ I I J 1.1 l 11iii\I VJ l£/l Ulf emu, CIIICAGO TITLE BELLEVUE R1 007 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.T.A.COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B (continued) Order Na_: 1009010 Your No.; DC PROPERTIES SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION (AND PAGE NO. FOR FULL DESCRIPTION) . ASSESSOR'S TAX PARCEL NUMBER(s) . RETURN ADDRESS (IN TOP 3" MARGIN) . **A COVER SHEET CAN BE ATTACHED CONTAINING THE ABOVE FORMAT AND DATA IF THE FIRST PAGE DOES NOT CONTAIN ALL REQUIRED DATA. ADDITIONAL PAGES: 1" TOP, SIDE AND BOTTOM MARGINS CONTAINING NO MARKINGS OR SEALS. ALL PAGES: NO STAPLED OR TAPED ATTACHMENTS. EACH ATTACHMENT MUST BE A SEPARATE PAGE. 1ILL NOTARY AND OTHER PRESSURE SEALq MUST BE SMUDGED FOR VISIBILITY. FONT SIZE OP 8 POINTS OR LARGER. THE FOLLOWING MAY BE USED AS AN ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON THE DOCUMENTS TO BE RECORDED TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIIREMENTS OF ROW 65,04_ SAID ABBREVIATED LEGAL, DESCRIPTION IS NOT A SUBSTITui'E POR A COMPLETE LEGAL DESCRIPTION WHICH MUST ALSO APPEAR IN THE BODY OF THE DOCUMENT: PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST. END OF SCHEDULE B cLTncMea/xnivcvs JUN-13-2002 THU 01:34PM ID: PAGE:i ,/13/1002 13:35 FAA Z53651i8775 uu 1t1V1 l,J v A.,. LVVG 14.GO rAA CHICAGO TITLE BELLEVUE liti003 � � I CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A (Continued) Order No.: 1009010 Your No: DC PROPERTIES LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT (Paragraph 4 of Schedule A cantnination)- i THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMEf'i'E mERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING WEST OF THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY NO. 5, AS ESTABLISHED BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 5346368; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING WITHIN THE RIGHT OF WAY FOR EAST VALLEY HIGHWAY. DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON JUN272002 RECEIVED I I' r,1mtov muivoe+9 PAGF:7 __TY OF RENTON 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Printed: 06-27-2002 Land Use Actions RECEIPT Permit#: LUA02-079 Payment Made: 06/27/2002 10:49 AM Receipt Number: R0203726 Total Payment: 1,500.00 Payee: DC PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Current Payment Made to the Following Items: Trans Account Code Description AmouuREIQpME r pLa 5009 000.345.81.00.0006 Conditional Use Fees 1, 000.00 ln'OF EN1'O/4441AYG 5010 000.345.81.00.0007 Environmental Review 500.00JU Payments made for this receipt RECEIVED Trans Method Description Amount Payment Check #1071 1,500.00 Account Balances Trans Account Code Description Balance Due 3021 303.000.00.345.85 Park Mitigation Fee .00 5006 000.345.81.00.0002 Annexation Fees .00 5007 000.345.81.00.0003 Appeals/Waivers .00 5008 000.345.81.00.0004 Binding Site/Short Plat .00 5009 000.345.81.00.0006 Conditional Use Fees .00 5010 000.345.81.00.0007 Environmental Review .00 5011 000.345.81.00.0008 Prelim/Tentative Plat .00 5012 000.345.81.00.0009 Final Plat .00 5013 000.345.81.00.0010 PUD .00 5014 000.345.81.00.0011 Grading & Filling Fees .00 5015 000.345.81.00.0012 Lot Line Adjustment .00 5016 000.345.81.00.0013 Mobile Home Parks .00 5017 000.345.81.00.0014 Rezone .00 5018 000.345.81.00.0015 Routine Vegetation Mgmt .00 5019 000.345.81.00.0016 Shoreline Subst Dev .00 5020 000.345.81.00.0017 Site Plan Approval .00 5021 000.345.81.00.0018 Special Permit Fees .00 5022 000.345.81.00.0019 Variance Fees .00 5023 0 .00 5024 000.345.81.00.0024 Conditional Approval Fee .00 5036 000.345.81.00.0005 Comprehensive Plan Amend .00 5909 000.341.60.00.0024 Booklets/EIS/Copies .00 5941 000.341.50.00.0000 Maps (Taxable) .00 5954 604.237.00.00.0000 Special Deposits .00 5955 000.05.519.90.42.1 Postage .00 l 5998 000.231.70.00.0000 Tax .00 CY OF RENTON 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Printed: 06-27-2002 Land Use Actions RECEIPT Permit#. LUA02-079 Payment Made: 06/27/2002 10:51 AM Receipt Number: R0203728 Total Payment: 2.22 Payee: JIM JAEGER 3EVELuPMENT Current Payment Made to the Following Items: Trans Account Code Description Amount Pl ANNING 5955 000.05.519.90.42.1 Postage 2.22 CITY OF RENTON JUN 2 7 2002 Payments made for this receipt RECEIVED Trans Method Description Amount Payment Cash 2.22 Account Balances Trans Account Code Description Balance Due 3021 303.000.00.345.85 Park Mitigation Fee .00 5006 000.345.81.00.0002 Annexation Fees .00 5007 000.345.81.00.0003 Appeals/Waivers .00 5008 000.345.81.00.0004 Binding Site/Short Plat .00 5009 000.345.81.00.0006 Conditional Use Fees .00 5010 000.345.81.00.0007 Environmental Review .00 5011 000.345.81.00.0008 Prelim/Tentative Plat .00 5012 000.345.81.00.0009 Final Plat .00 5013 000.345.81.00.0010 PUD .00 5014 000.345.81.00.0011 Grading & Filling Fees .00 5015 000.345.81.00.0012 Lot Line Adjustment .00 5016 000.345.81.00.0013 Mobile Home Parks .00 5017 000.345.81.00.0014 Rezone .00 5018 000.345.81.00.0015 Routine Vegetation Mgmt .00 5019 000.345.81.00.0016 Shoreline Subst Dev .00 5020 000.345.81.00.0017 Site Plan Approval .00 5021 000.345.81.00.0018 Special Permit Fees .00 5022 000.345.81.00.0019 Variance Fees .00 5023 0 .00 5024 000.345.81.00.0024 Conditional Approval Fee .00 5036 000.345.81.00.0005 Comprehensive Plan Amend .00 5909 000.341.60.00.0024 Booklets/EIS/Copies .00 5941 000.341.50.00.0000 Maps (Taxable) .00 5954 604.237.00.00.0000 Special Deposits .00 5955 000.05.519.90.42.1 Postage .00 5998 000.231.70.00.0000 Tax .00 Remaining Balance Due: $0.00