Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA98-114 ,.,...,., . .. --• ,......,_.• . ,!COMPOST.ROOFING . ,-- ia(ETEBROR LIGHT FIXTURE. , -• 1 1-,..V e.... „, .,, U. ! :Tr ...s.,CC.ROC.. 5/MI CEDAR F.CIA w/C.UnE13 '?... . I 2•4 GP TIXO ... , . 1 i'64.-2.,.. ) . IMMI _ • : , -rt , ...--643POST ff1/4.• T.CAP RAIL '1- —s•— _,,._ ,------.—_,_—_,—— ' : FALL ARCHITECTUR /-PAVEARIIT . , 1 ---, 1 ki p.TPHL--X i,,__,,, ...:=2-_MUM:r,(.:t -.., iffor:2„../ iT >-.\-:.s ED i 1..: 1..1 1.1 III,..li If•KM AIME 11// in' ;II,D..nu,ETABED ,II, 1•6 PINKS 0 6'0.C. — •-T.-.-'-a--31 ---0-..-,-,, ;- /DaTIG J.MI, Archit \ •UUII /:r-a-c/FTH. ,c7n7 1'. .\,.. .J. 1---AITFF1-1-":C716.—IFFH • • ,- ''IL------:7 tiliStO.bIalt.ME 165th911Str. 'f.TT01)RCM RAIL luau. FRONT ELEVATION . 1 1,!, , •--. r`-h----1-":.: --'ZIL--..-.T—- I 1 'I i-.4.1. / j SCALE.1/13.1-0 , . I. • I SZ.ABLEZ Si ad CEDAR AMIENG•Nalli P. ' .BARGE BOARD T„3 2Lj . . . '1 , _ ii-I, ,I , .I• •I• s . -...t': •12-1.5. §'-' 1: 1,, „ i 4d/ l'.•, , ,,T• ('I,,:) \''. i 1 i 1, \if!RYA= 4 11.41 •====-- -------=_,:-._-----:'. . .'FRONT ELEVATOR FI:TION' \ I 5.‘ 1/fuAsr°"cke sT l' - --- .1 —:c;,::„ -" DETAIL AT FENCE \ rI //ta--——— i. -41--... - _ ------ --ke, 11 i 'i\I 0 4 0 0 ,, I ') END ELEVATIONS , IT i'• \ I `,. .- • , • i ,-- 1 SCALE 1/111,1-0 '‘ 4- l'Ax, ‘ :: ;\ 1, M • ...,V I •STALL CAVORT-1 OM Iola,- T--- t,sE",r4E, A "• ,, I• sTArt cA/; rox ., IX MEET NY BEE CET,3/*1 ..- . f l 1. ' I 21.-EC I , IC-0' 131.-0. /' -,..t.?"--- --f.„, .irsi,..„...........„,..-STATOARII PRAIRICTI ,,.% 6 Mil WAKE- ti : Is 1 \ STALL,TYPICAL.....I,, /.., REE MET AT--1:: : ACCESSOIE PART* -,...__ . '' -.'''. . ' CHANTELL ,r_ 1 I 1 : - - ONG.CURB PER CTRL rows , Tirl \s, ---. 11'41 --irc,7, \ • 1. '\' : • FACE OF POST OD fLOI'ilt%oVIA II \ "? 1 '''')-3)-1 ) .:: : S 't'l—'11 for \ N (2) _ ______ -' .1'.,'--7-, V.') i ANNETTE DEMI a 1/ii ICI : .0&A\I ) IFF-71 • --, ... ) •I: : X / / ... TOP OF FOX Inn. -.--LXJ100ELED34.-X • 1 i `11!--7,---1/11' / 6'.03E ON.SIAS RR FR3Xlrf STILL ms) 2308 NE 24th S AT DOOR SIOE : , I ONE 3'TO 5'NOE . I : ._i q.: : 31 /. WA lintiogton 9Ik _ (ED . . * iii• * . I COI.INCINIE:413X."" 1SO/MO KRA% 'SW I I I:: : 41 ''••• i / .-•••••--ACCESSIX.E Ranx • - • 77---. ''L- .‘---#-151‘..., AB .: ..- ', —AB ''' ! '"---"`I'" ,..„7.,_ 'I.-44IYOft: '••• \.1 ..._ r1101/1117SEOE \ .3:i...0160ST,,SE I,I,I/ I 1 ...Dna..MUREX piTERNATONAL SYMBOI .... I .1 A/FFIII •' ...I4 ATHC., t nua.ttoo.-utou.n l' "riegaz- .4:000,..7- ' 1 FOUNDATION PLAN Of...nem. 7 „ , 1 . , ,p 03•91EP) .."' '11 .C,--..11•C ENTRY imam- -: \ i .,.. — WV NT DON •,. 4: i- - is'E SCALE:1/81.1-0 ,I, X-0.. 1 5_0.,I, y.,,,• ,L.,.CESS1BLE SR.. '•_/,.., I r_.c. SR.-411T11 RADE STAID RIM I , 14.11.4111.1 SLOPE OF „ :.." 1 iiri ) ',. _--k -... I aN,DIRECTION .......Cv \ ,,, ' 1 !"--,----•; — OS \EIN-0PM,V,Z2.('"' -____,; IEFE=I ----i- I %. ..,0,04-6 igioi , ) —.. ...1 ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS , CI; PRoRIX cow ' =Arm ,.., 3 :1...... 1=3A1=1. I--1€1,I-1.-1--.-11.4,_ ._. I , , BM .2 *\ -.--iEE / ,...-•- 1, 1051116:_..... ' ' 1. 1 cevox Mahal&SOE OF re'CIPTIr ..-...1 .. _ --- TS , ,e---_-----'-3_-)-•'-,—22.Ax 64T TCCUOWM 1. / 1 I-i igiew,7AtR4LE, T,O O.EXt.".FrSSIB°L7 L.CFNU/JRT2SIB •:::r •-, e _ 14.,•,— •T / ---._ .__0_ __._ //' :7. / / , l / ' / , L10 72-6. A " —°-'" '9'\/ AD-S / SITE PL...' A_. N ,.0.TO NCODO . r WALE i 20 FLOOR PLAN (2 STALL GARAGE WITH 8 STALL CARPORT) - T COO NW (FF.P)ACEE I..,..,........., ;I:I ElEY.00il SITE PLAN 12,0' SITE DETAILS it i itr -- r----------- 17 11 -II DO CIO mix co.c.n7DEFt. ,! ma 11E11 A 1 ,......_,.4nr ---;:, ow T's"'" 4 ggr,,-Tro-e,' -.,,' 2.-, eva TRASH BIN ENCLOSURE PrAi F ...017n • • E __ CHANTELLE APARTMENTS PRE-APP 98-29 I I / ° PART OF if NW 1/4 OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 23N, RANGE b'E 5E, WM MT) 6'YIN { 1 I • \ : / I ��0.A TN\N\`\\:... . O.Q. -r��-16• +ti��� .TW Y` 6.•g r-..-1 �� it.Ja.. �/ ' CURB AND CUTTER SHOWN \-SEE DETA,L'a•' Ise-- -Sr' �1—f 6 1 1 , AM-PMI TERATrt ��� YAB�ERU6ED Ea CURBS I s ._ 31]-- _T.- _�. __ ' �- A s,w EK"Equ.DI (SEE STANDARD PLANS) asil N WEL • —,—. s1 `— >w-.ua.�1►= - p���,s. -144, -: •A LP,-.7 L. SObi R I -_ _ i I �"� 1 1 \ E L. Ilan.PxR sxu.BE Pv.nn wr ro[.aE9,°OR NOR,as„IA«,a D/c.,NEr sxAu i { I I I I I `r. I E I« ` \ NW 2-1/EH EEEP Li 4 L7L. E f..S,B.IS I, I I .319:33 J oi > :Co,:BE 4r.�4�J GO,m Lxmu,ED. I I } I \�: E9 MICR.NON O. O WI,TR.OUT MY BE MIMEO g %;';/ -]IB DS , • 1 Y I k • E. S.W.k. MALL SE SSE w00.0 PROMS. �i6• /,/, TI II J�A913• I t t T, r,c Nu.Tw.r/,>LLr xxiEx.E. CEMENT CONCETE APPROACH /� I i T` I .,°rx wu eEo.°En n,..rxc ornce.r/ FOR DRIVEWAYS AND ALLEYS DETAIL AIA .� I nr uu,..,o.H ADOPTED STANDARD PLANS APPROACH N,TN qE'� L._t\�')- �°0 J RM. tar 9ATT•TE/96 MOSEE'NOTEHIC°5"B W E^ \ 4.n `-'6'1 P C OD"T.La/E ig I I_j 1'� ORO WAIF,ER01N SP PAGE:N06 �_ L 1 CC ., / I T r� —I " �'7- ._ _ _.. I'I DOSING ASPNKT_yYW !GUTTFA 0., IJJ 317.60 y • SAWCUT 's. y U �• { S,ar 1T.M • I nl • yOTES Q 4 • wsr wArEr,MINE wcxNEss d urcnrrR i / t\ { I • A I I ,,. __ I718,• i,-- Y _ I{ ---____-_ �' d' •OR 10 BEYOND EDGE OE OAw.C20 PA.K4ENt N 1.. 31 ,.. __,_,.y. t� 1 `\ 5551RE8TOWNtYUY !�— �' Il.ld FT_1 --_• 1 • °"aT.6. (-� M j9P R 6'CRUSHED ROOT J CC /%/ I H I 1 /rf9Y _ I CURB&GUTTER REPLACEMENT DETAIL G > y RESWIaK STREET YMIUY / I 1 I J1 A6{�I / '6� IA R �' 6••CRUSHED cxrr or MR.ADO E Rq PTED �•9.®,�N6 LEGAL DESCRIPTION < `G /�' I •I ,T: � { \?.� r ,h x.y LOT 4 REN.SP 384-79-791018900E L_.Ii ,pq ��SS— ,I, • ,y "°<, PARCEL NUMBER m /. I � . -i �"� .I`°�" ::St).16 SEE UtCI9TECNAL DRAWING SHEET'q2' ~ 1;' j 'r - ],6198 1 ,/ FOR TYPICAL BERM DETAIL 4T BU,LDINCS. II 1 162305-9120-06 ' I 0 -31T65 I ]16.�6 {I �/� QUANTITIES: F ' y 1_ %l" I 3 V--- I ]I6.°6 li / s/sue LOT SIZE: .89 ACRE /� a o..� E.P..3,).95`�. A I _ }t6Ne ; I J t g NAa w , ///, �1_T / / / ASPHALT PAVING: 11,724 S.F. f/ i/I/ I �' RiP-AP .., Av--,i gl w CUT: Z 1 ti� I I I L C ��. 3,6,.'.' .f65 U.N.4° J ,.-�, LLt °. �"\ a }91 /s/ FILL ..-1 13 LE 12'R PN;61R ` �� �'�'A \ ,�-31R.6�' y -� / -+ ��1d�' E.sus,� / IMPERV.AREA: 6 LE J6".CW 6 OOi C.B.p 1 SEE.4M��AtE/,',0/ ,.'.,/ o,, // / ••NOT FOR BIDDING PURPOSES Nnd �N 1E..>. iiii_ +I,. c6� , ��' . DEVELOPER: z .-- .-, .•j T2: s// s IGETAOK°WpEiM.KEi j ANNETTE DEMP$ Q _ :ass 6 a"y' 2308 N.E.241h STREET p,l 04N�"aW5- : ��0'. AW_v. / RENTON,WA 98056 MONDE 4' ��. _ -EON ,.A V /////s"' °/° y' (425)226-6632 • pTy�T'6P TZEN ��% 11A.i0'� 'co PEYOKwn 6 °/ % 'QCHi STAND i>-`. - • "9 it YEv?." . IT 7993B0EEWum*_ /iiii. I - - _ ,2'R Pt•19 �/S °/ 6 SITE ADDRESS: z_ CHANTELLE PLACE �CV T3•E' �` j ARCHITECT: '/° 1�N �R ✓ ° 2800 N.E. 3rd STREET d CI�v � /� 1 s/ I RENiON,WA 98056 C4' J/NY,N 3ra J ,1� �- 1 FALLS.W. 1 ARCHITECTURAL s = SEAS S.W. 981 STREET �� I SEATTLE.WA 96146 I'�'� °�i° TOM]n.Ero (206)431-7960 `e' VERTICAL DATUM / - 6 CffY OF RENiON a _GRR._...�- ids °-° ENGINEER: B.M.- JEFFFFERSON AVE N.W.ST. s. / GRAPHIC SCALE °/y� JOHAN OYE P.E. RRr`• -_ 'a in m �� 12202 PACIFIC AVE 5 Mk . __ o�-1gR9 TACOMA,WA 98444 ELEV.-99.1B3Y=326.304 ma .+d AE ,�vs 65In (253)537-8128 THIS PUN SET IS NOT 0 SURVEY. —1 101-0. q Ix O 1'' AA E 8 ..., —1a 11 O > _ _ © x B I'T `.I i 71 1.NF-A01 1 Bawd L Pall, Melded — e— - ' L`J ' t �a >Il53dYwil(PY 9nd' ® k Tw!ylaa MEN /— _- O8 —_ o _ -Lr -- - --- - —.= 4 — _ O END ELEVATION TYPE I FRONT ELEVATION — TYPE 1 7 i SCALE: 3/16".1'-0" SCALE: 3/16".1'-0" C j[J jANTE LLE TYPICAL EXTERIOR FINISHES TYPICAL CONSTRUCTION ASSEMBUES APARTMENTS SEE FEp'GIIOG SEE SHEET A13 FOR ASSELIELY DESCRIFONS ANNETTE DEWS 1 HOUO eUs f00P ©wm D i l SEEO D ..'s opso F1 n0OR RCEIl1NG ASSEMBLY w1 PARfY WALL ASSEMBLY wa EXTERIOR WALL ASSEMBLYHIRE RESISTIVE I HOUR FIRE RESISTIVE NON-RATED ` ,W ENCLOSuRES To HAVE HEAD wk1 ca 111ONS h a NANUFACTuRED 3113111G R2,T21.TRW WBLC VEM w eA. M. (i�.cF�"s:R SF z3 vnNc O i�zlnxi,� ®''FRS " ' I HOUR FIRE RESISTIVE I HOUR ORE RESISTIVE NON-RAZED ,W' 'v E°o[ouAim) O AN,COINER TR. ®r..&E rir . si OR FZ STAIR LANDING ASSEMBLY \ STMR ENCLOSURE WS E%1ERIOR WALL ASSEMBLY ©Cuss e'couoSnaN 1ET FREc "^ WALL ASSEMBLY AT RETAINING WALL ©ENNGIE ROOFWc O nNYL TSRAI AROUND (Fus.uN'UT O NON-RATED REFNWNG w.uL NON-RATED cN 2.1 CE T-TERs F3NON-RATED Rt ON x.e cEOAR FssnA 1 O SUE 0 a ne u,_ EXTERIOR DECK ASSEMBLY W3 INTERIOR PARTITION ROOF-CEILING ASSEMBLY O VINIL SASH MNCOwS- WC 0KR ST. SET DRENIAG x'cE ASSEMBLY YE wINDOw SDNEDULE ENTRY VA.LN 10'ROOF SUGSUXFO NofiZOFRAUY O NON-RATED OGUARD RAIL FLOOR SLAB ASSEMBLY xwooe I f !:1 �-- �' }----_. _._... . r\�.. "raR a RUTS A _ I— _—.._ .-� PA W. \ TOR a eEAr` S. - -� R. SM ^m * Iz -r_ - - Ix L 3 C =•i" 1 (III o•s IMTB L _ -- __ UNR B It i FNSI ilR.aQT.7 arFLP7 _ rriI NI.m��.=_ „Ilk •.OA Q� a 1 P b e PAro LTV. F1 A •.IIIII .;—.. — - - _ I Ii l� _ J FwsN noa I UNIT A 4 !IV IIIII! Nile �1� FDr+Ns� __ ____ ____ 1.__ > _- _ = _ _ _ - BUILDING ELEVATIONS '^1roR OF nAA ;,IIII `-- — BUILDING SECTIONS o — _ � _ __ C _ n oTo C k PAro UV. ink II I(�I!I II III aRORosm — _ _ I UNIT A - 5}.�E Mb *Fw9N FLOOR I UNIT AMVI a -aUNIT FIR.( 7-- ..__ {,,, v�IML' OuT __-...__— �I -- ]tS.Ae'0�. °"'"OOMOE `T _ 11 I f ..�, BUILDING SECTION A—A REAR ELEVATION — TYPE 1 ri a1 N SCALE: 3/16".1'-0" SCALE: 3/16"=1'-0" 1 li I'' n (vim--- \ /N m e c fAR SLOG OSR.00• HUGE :: it " 17 a x x I ® - = o 0 0 _- _ n 11 _L IIIIII iM - o ® 1 , =IL1111111111111III l 4 --- _ I O7 -IIiii!III -4 ..__ - I --- O — ------- -. -- Q'i il\_ - Et -n ❑ n NRENNIMI PROPOSED r mom I i— _ I r 1NDG ''tx. ''''" SHe" EUm RLE SG �.YE END ELEVATION - TYPE 2 1�'xOlVT-E'L�TATION - TYPE 2 ' ' CIIANTELLE SCALE: 3/16'-1'-0' SCALE: 3/16-.1'-0' APARTMENTS TYPICAL EXTERIOR FINISHES TYPICAL CONSTRUCTION ASSEMBLIES yE SEE SPE[fG110NS SEE SHEET A1J FOR ASSENRLT KSCRIM. ANNETfE DSIfPS 1'St- ertEmoR STAR Si TA r''Av S•ET F "NG FLOORRCEIUNG AS FIRE SEMBLY PARTY WALL ASSEMBLY EXXTERIOR WAIL ASSEMBLY 111 N-RATED { m w O OwiOu" '"stm°Ms TO ©wm SIDED GOMORNL I xF�EwSLOPm n"0°Foxs Fl TIVE W7 1 HOUR FIRE RESISTIVE W4 r. Er trams O&a w •cw ,2 uaE RENrrw v 2908 NE�24thtot _u LESS MAN u FLY.. `A'FREE "�` 1 HOUR FIRE RESISTIVE Q 1 HOUR FIRE RESISTIVE O NON-RATED ASSEMBLY �"'E mu D EMI.) ®ten CORNER TRw 13 xrr?.EF„r a FZ STAIR LANDING ASSEMBLY W STAJR W�ASSEMBLY RE WS ARETAININGEXTERIOR WALL HI CLASS B COWSRION F iNG OAR 2 sNiNc1E RGOFMG O w„ri rniu NROUNo NON-RATED NON-RATED w Do.s 14 a w N,NL NON-RATED 8 ova a cEuwDFA'u P a r No.wc POS g N FI cw- F3 EXTERIOR DECK ASSEMBLY W3 INTER OR PMTR ON R1 ROOF-CEIUNG ASSEMBLY AWL swPORTwc aaa ,5T a+EwNG x•Aea.E O s MOOR �LE DKR SRAM ROOF SasxE NON-RATED ASSEMBLY N ENTRY ORiio.10LLY MEASURED F4 FLOOR SUB ASSEMBLY ONmD GUARD RIVE _ „TOP M PLATE _E .. BR. CL CL ENTRY UNOING n :. I ®iLl 0 g -' ,l L nwsn IGOR Karr -- fi\ I' m ^�PNDe noon - _.. .,,TOP. LA ---i�Pc � � , Ili �� _— — — r rz >o 8,9 1 I�cL Cy ENTRY !AA r I�II'I, \ ," - — Ai PwsN li i�� I II 1 ..O m unNOn _ -_.- -- _ I BUILDING ESECTIONS 11 — TI :. ^.,`•lroiE �..;�II _ - -- ___ __ _ _. BUILDING SECTIONS F "�, IIIIIlil11 An 1r OE eiii N -_ ..4,_ J UT a cL DM unDIFDG ' UNIT c -� .,--,i�SH wo^ �u /11 \ ' - ?F»nw noon 49 BUILDING SECTION A-A © REAR ELEVATION - TYPE 2 Ai SCALE. 3/16":1'-0' SCALE: 3/16'ml'-0" . • - - "") k CAR loRK D •RF-141 ,, 1 '-'I• *.• $ - -' '--ti•' -+.4-!_^5___.! i--- 1."''' '''''''''' ''--- 411-4111%, ^-4% - --.1;E I - i$I-;-_,.., --Ail----1 • /1.,r",,' '' , -.4',•• --" ,.,..')'61 . s *.%•., ial•-"'",.f ' '6 .1 0 .. . I 1 ?-."' • 4 --.. j,„„'"----,. 1( --4 - . ,',,,-;- --i-L----1 -- .... , st.......--...,,, --„..,..,„, ,,.. . . , . 7 . , ,,,„.. ... ,, , •I •/,,,,,.. ,,, •-„.\-.,, 0,.. - ••,, •,,,, 0 '',,, - 7T,-"'"'•'•'•••...„_•,*: -„. f kZL••••._--4' 'Ila... iifir -, P•C ,i< t. +MO 1,0111D n V CP AAAAA "UIII Z1 ';',:;:''',,...'' Z.',\' '''', -. ' ' . . •:',,,,4R'''''' '''''''''''".-..'- :Z..-"Z''.---- '-'..164111.,4 . F.: .,,,* .•,',.' \ eti, ' ''" ' --.--,,Z;::,-"---,,ZT'-',.. N ' HO SER WAY A( ' - ..'•.,,,,. 4\.' F. ',,-,,,,,,,, ..,*,1,4%.%' / '',--4,-44 ,,,, ,„ "4 ,r_:::Dc ik17...-if'zir:••.,,,,a. — •"' / •liejlibp.4ifi•t" /AN,. ''- ,......•••••:''''""- •-•-.- 4•• .i c .s•,..:,,4..,....,. . -"," / . *-"*"4.., --,,'Z:,._.:„.riti.;4:-,,_7:, 1 , ,,w ''C..,,' „.. f,i 1 el —,---+--..--..,=,-r-'-`-',--. _ i• , • f'- ' . // s --';';'''''. --t 4'.----:-:---n---- -1_--,---,,:"."...,•‘,'S\ 4 le; ! ..:..........,...... 4*. ,11:j_.. OltIO:KlIV , r "REY OU,' DR. NE. , .....„,,,r,,,.^•'">„...---;.••XP., - ET/rP3? I , • ill a. " ' - '''' 1 ,.. . '. •i' 4 ,,, . htray :2-..4- . --0 izZ4‘... . o•-•-• ,c,-\--_,....._ /4,7.4.-..- _,,,.,__. ...._-_---;-___-- ..... - , , ‘9°4' ' ^ -_,- __esx''' i.'" ..1. ;-•"'--. ' .:.::-i4.14, 'P', '\‘•,,,..\--,,. 6'sr4rE HWY 465--4''."-'. 1F'''''-::-:--, --' PRI AVE. NE.t 44., ,1 il I i( ,,,:,.., --,,,a 04, a•-iy. ,4••••...••'••,••,•e,,,,31_:1 t..-• • &&""':4:„...,," .., V.:.; ,-,,,. ,„/ , ---,i- -,„,, ..„..„.• , %pr., rt ., '.-P WV6 .10. .\.\. ------------_,-:----7:1,9°'..:::X‘Hs'....5;_14,-1 \ —.- - -,-. , \ -....,,,, • . ..A.Nlis , 'pa AVE. '• .14: '"1 *\\)\ ,.. \' ' ----; -',. , \ iv, • ..... .- ,.. - , -. , .3, .• •, ----ed .. c. n ,. .! i4ii,.. - - i\f-,,,,,-,\ , ,A.,.-1;.,-%-_,-..4- --49,„,v,„,rt, ,,,,n-- ., •i,- Trii,n - • -,, „.2-_,-., ,..,:si ; \ ' ‘,.., ,,...-., , ...,,,..,„,,i.!•,,74...7.- , --••••, - r.., .,_•.2yN v.a..., - • 9•••" ' ' ' S, 4...:-''''''C° ACE ' 1‘4 ' : . . '"zan,-gi)al: ' 'rn , •, , -A ono a I e t, ,::qi.. ku, .t.,'. 1 '.,•••-cC4 _,'.4*,'', 17,,,-.r-"-.-[- -,q-., ' g , dv,0 is.x ,vil ,, 1.,f,...$.ej.... ar ‘.4-.- .A !., ; •• • c •._. -,..,,liti.c,,,,, "17,1• , ji,1 •-4`i,xt,4,,4-",;-'74•44,t...."Sie' ;:: .•; .J),"::: 17'4',Iitl , .- c poi l'. .•• '• ''- 'fi;41. 0 43b4, ' , .-i••''' ' 41. . '`•• ••s'A'i-' •-'''*: •• i '-1 t, ,, ;11 • . 0, 3 ..='1 :.t -A 1 7-•:. .-,!.. 1"v *0,0 ...! a . 1,. ' ' ' ...F.: -.'":'''''4‘.41`7,44.0A-•••'al •"..4 •ili . .? ;',‘. . ' . ''''-'•1-2" '' '''1:1 IV"t it 7.b • Ns•r's; • -ti—A '4-- I •,4 • :::,- , 6 . ,''. IP ' v'ilb.... * ' 42t =iit *',',T.' 4 .\--,\IP 0' f; A- ••- • Fr' .7';', "---' , 4,'we''. WINDSOR P L. . • -.' 3 14;4:_ 1!.-,:1!:?,.< .. '1.: i''' a ....; ‘• ' -,r-- Xi — . . • - '•— ••.'U6 •VIVI:4-,•411-3LIP-t. ' ' C---'' -• •:-!: -• , .-. - .- - - -----$:- V: - \ el '', ,aat '\: , .7., ' ' '029,'. - 4.1F" ,.4' ..e•i,...• 1'1: ...*t? ..' -'Mk, a _._•,,,,._... , . , • ' '" '' "1.‘: .,. •. ,':' ..9'12 ".,..er.'"%V',••• •AP-P441, . ,'314 ,- .i.• --..- ..-. ' ' .13 S . "`.1't- „,r= - , ,t.- ....., • • ' S' ..i .. 'A - • - ...'. --.4.:-.. .— i :' i- -, ,,,,w . ,., n ,.._ . --,,,,• ,.... cs ....0, . ' 7--:.- 1 : 1 '''''. ', • ' - .t.. " -- -t - F..- \ . ';• ,..,,, '',' r T•,‘,L . ,, . g ,I, -i,.: 4.1.,.•,' lls. \wt. , „ . . . . --,_ _ 0 0 , 40. A*A. ] -i E ' .' . -,.,- ••- 1 -•••-Is-•--- Ia \ 3N 't'-•• '41:'''•I''•‘ •V‘j.'1 . ' '4:,4 "V-/•"44 q a .0, - •,s;,, • ,,,,,,, , .. ,, tl 1 9 i 6 \ I ,...: ,_ .2 tail;, n i, ., .y. 1 a 1-, • 1..,••J i_,Lr.bii, 3 - . HARRINGTON ,. ,,,. $::.• ! ,..*;ii. t ,.?,..176: .i ,r4Atg fr.!'[04, ,A, ,.. t \ --., $-' ,,-,,,,,-•.,- . et-, PP; ,, : • `$ ...-1‘U -:E; 111 -LI El ?., ,..EZ;) X !WOE%2 PL—re a ::: f...* .41,. ' ' k i'.a ita ft 4:1 .44 ; -• i —• •• vi, 0 on,'' ..;NIk. , 'A ^'' ., : - ...-z 7,-.• 1=v:7 .,,,i ..,.T-.6,-_. 0_,-:\ , „,•=:•'..T''.; # :.7,- -., -..... i \,-A ,_,..._,....... . \ . ....,. . _ ,,,.., .,. , , 4 . , , , ., R, , 1 ,r•—•••••-,-,•;.%4,1- ' ' , ,/ ...• •c7§344,1.. . • ,..• „.„ , . Z— I ‘,, ,1 1 : 'VC . 4 ' 1 i ,-,- _ ' Cf- :, - 11 • ,\: _ \.i.,.. 1,, ___. ,.. ,, 1!, ' ! ,z,\.Its . - ,,,_ ., KIRKLA:455.0 AVE. ..1 i-t , ... i •, ________..„ ,. — N , • -KV p 1 a - . 1 '•-= - • . ... 1 d A 4 ' q--p -,,-,,/ •..,s c co :qv... 41 ME ssor q ' CI i ff, -• -_, f 1...1 N.E. 4 1ONROE AVE MONROE AVE N.E.E t I I I I I I 14;f • an . rg n ,?$,G c2 c WM 9 r iF - "-- — I": J .....-0,...-. li .• I-1 XLID1 NM ' igloo ti ., _,74 .3 .....-3 • -..-11 1 t LIE -E, 8- R ie.fgg ....P _ • az,”M I °I° 1" '..I •w P, • 1.tre • • l!i till L � 31L.4 3.L.....4 _� • • • A )• A ]R T N r S OE f 1 ❑❑ Mid I ha, trdil PROJECT TEAM: UNIT AREAS: CONTRACTOR COORDINATION NOTES: VICINITY MAP: I;" MIER. ONTTOT. NTENOME ro Ss. ,fai lea N UNIT d UNIT OEM/PATIO EDRERIOR MT • NR T E. ROTS SD6.N.iNN TO�A C.N.ST.0 Sh Nu SN8i6.�✓ru(11. N RENNIN.r Nose AREA (sass) AREA STORAGE AREA (uec) ®royr., °`0....9..a1u1i "�' "'"'"` 1 ' z -3 41 -‘ . (!u�,�ne-,4w 01T1C z 1z15 ss Ie _ GSIIOSr°°°wss1 PDR a 114T ME MO ouTFNED SCOT SAL PIT.noon T.I AN COMORE 4 WOW DEWS A/FM 1 1200 66 18 1122 N.ES Aem p OF Au.Nos.Elm a0,WAD.Co QILY wp am RATTER F 'vra.: 4 TM'1, @QAL U.nlwt'ICN WO O 2 NIaNYC I1IO11 CO..LL fO.CM *Am A/NC I 12m 18 66 1126 R6.....sNT.wmYwoL rc �l, r�M. .,0,, • P.O. O6 6EMM4 VA 96036 B 2 951 66 IB BBT OOD RECESSED GEOM.COMM! / j i j.. - N25 m-1An MIINo a i '8 Lk.I ADfYMS'NSRB3 C 4 1194 66 1B 1123 NATO.6 SOW "`"DUES [ Aa6 ITORPT RM.WAS.1C.d 372A •CONTACT:1 M nos C/FTH 3 1329 66 1e 1110 A Nu ESN R'm v' -1 � NEST w/FR+ 1 1179 ss 1e 111Die'„�"",mE1°.'ann/ia�E a.mam'�"n„ A i; ,� I .«E..w.a. MOIIECI: iyT.A3 2W IOW - D 1 933 68 IB e65 w ,ON OWNER jOW S 1A - �v E( ))ilw,W0u0EECE 1N Y (ypy� �O!►'"� .. _.Si. „ f106)242-6T.i 165ALE 9ME4o.AB"M[w(,swi]R) F� _ XE ""'V L ALT:6rDafNa UNIT MIX: aPOST.V6R 46OS A . LANDSCAPE MDIVE.1: wcTEAPEACE CCEOTR CTON.Cc O. emy24NNMsa. D.of ENNA.011 .a ® �iNE 4 C SIDrz. //I.N MS 6O006aRM NE N. UNIT TYPES UECOp9t°RAAA�a"n CAu11L v`03104C: a L. '''' - UT.12 036 A A/FFN A/lIC 8 C C/FTN 4(/FFN) D \ 71-3 _ )E E. I6 CONTACT RDRIN CAR. yak 9#E m a :0 CHANTELI Q$DOWER .10.1 OW P.E IXEL - BLDG 1 1 e 1 1 11 I E - ( - _ - , PACIFICROW 6 TYPE n TOTALS TRAM STUN 1W TO D�„N9 9POOSTOT FOR F APARTMEN9 Ns MCOa I.0/MY,nAnn0 MN. Y 2 1 1 z _ _ _ a CM.M.COMES. Nyap[Nn. - . 2 - - _ - 3 12 COYMF. PI SNRV 11.000 �... F RO sE r ANNETTE DIY. wI.Ownw 1.01 0 DPI: - =- et gi 2116 10ri1 ST.CI.I ► a,.��res -. � ,=a eD aa.aL s 66326 TOTALS 2J 2..4 3 1 .- .1e.._ 2908 NE 24t6' Ow)666-35ro caw MI FEET>C RCA NC.Dan9 C ATE Inks,hthigl06 N TOM SOILS ENGINEER OWN CCNSRATAIRF.MC. ENAE - BUILDING AREAS: NE MANS NATO MN rz TEN LINT ITO NOT�"�' ,e6136r RACE NE. SUITE 2M RDa MN TR LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 14 NODS N 93.R AM°°s.9 WW CE CONTACT W.www6s KINe`°:.,g°Rf.1."'�„"3. ...'"SA CNO..VI.NS"ftf4'..A69 d' 'w>'w..AM W. cow..No1E4.CCONIMES SEE ETT SEE wco.o w.to Gm.wl E.n.,4a.o.1 EN...r nK LOT COL 9P 36E-n-mo1ao01 ayAY.� 1I RI OCCUPANCY CR056/U� u1a LA. SPEC j1�51005 FOR O�n1E1 RECEPTACLES ALTO s.locs. GRIM.DOWSER 10.1 ORNARIEI. D. E./..A..w1.4..YP.m. O SEE.vrEsswFry STOGY O.TOWS ax cs2)eCww<.cic.aCawESEwn. UNIDMTY RACE'M 96466 21 PARCEL NUMBER: f 3 SW=;:" FAX TYPE d g g a TOTAL CONTACT:01LE 16/N6c P.E 1 1 2782/2671 2761/2653 2761/2653 8304/2912 ENERGY COMPLIANCE: ,e23.5-9,2E-oe 6ERND AMUSE 6-111E.AQOM14 WC. - 2 2 2250/2848 2729/2628 2729/2628 8206/1902 APARTMENT BUILDINGS: I03 NEW 0n S10a1 SAW C OW r[n TA 6903'e T.SW.MM.. e. Do..1oN TO CALCUL.FOR MX ICE G.,TA STATE ENERGY WOE.1994 SECOND EDITION 008 N1au OFFICE ammo 0ALMTO6 FLEE I.N56,61Z_asEO oN 505 FOOT4GE VALUES PEN PRES RPnE a9 a FOR R-+:r9E a-1, R MOM ED SEIM/ EDO'BUILD.STANONDS'-SET/GILT.1995 EDRION FOR BY ELECTRIC RESISTANCE 100 6 ZONE 1 U OCCUPANCYTIPS v,PAR,NME,S ARO.APOES. CLUNG PERCENTAGE DE HEATED FLOOR AREA SHEET INDEX: 22 SHEETS TOTAL DEFERRED SUBMITTALS: NCM 3PE :CRAZING fOA: 1. f00.SUPPRESSUPPRESSIMS.(IE SUPPRESSION MS LSt R 9Q1:LLEE.OESp FRfxL STA161N5. Y WC A 2. PPE ALM STSRN T9T d � I 2272 2299 2299 6870 927 142R SHEET M.ENERGYNOTES 1 WOCIRE DMa3DN S1STM CRAAGE I -/- 420/395 -/- 420/396 652 A0N.0I.m NOTES.DEW.NOTES.STRUCTURAL Nora 4. ELECTRICAL SYSTEM 2 2359 2389 2389 7137 977 13.25 C33 WIMLATDN A SOOOR AIR OMIT COOS E P UNOC 6151ry CARPORT 1 -/- 1156/1076 -/- 1156/1026 CPIgN w ASONECTUIE *VS[SOW.FOOT.RA U aC Ex W RR.WALLS: R-9 (NCLU.0 INTERIOR SR.GRACE PIRA) AI SW RAZE MD DETNS ESPYDED*WARM. { ED.N+.y _RASED or SCR f001NE VALUES PER 01AZI/ 8 N0: 00 04 00 40. N.X A3. THE 1 MOOR F1DON 6 FRAYING PURR NOTES A 5000U S IOW'BURDMG STANDARDS'-SET/001.1995 EDITION FOR 5.PE... R-10 X 24' AI TYPE,FIRST FLOOR A 1RN1N0 FLAB: NOTES A FCIEDUEF 118E v APANIwENR 000 6M.a. 000R5: 111 0.20 AS AWE 1 SECOND FL00R A MAW.PIANS: NOTES e"NFVRf1 - N TYPE 2 WON.FLOOR A FRAYING FRAYI PINS: NOTES A M.O. GENERAL / SITE STATISTICS: TYPE'FIRST RC.A RC. FRNIIO PLAN`' NOTES A SCHEDULES N ,WE 2 SECOND FLOOR AND FRANTIC PLAYS NOIES A SOC.. a NIIEMOR EIEVAPONS A OETAL6 NYESSIBINY DEG. 99DVBLkyaa WOVE COPS 'so.NO OttURANOES: R-I -NORM.MUMS Ot1ELDRpR(MOM 20 Nos PER ACE A10 AWE 2 CD6 ELEVATIONS A SECTIONS oIV 2306 NT 24n Al2 TYPE 2 M 9U6aN0 ELEVATIONS a sECroIS B STATISTICS Ra160 6w Nm1 ACE FINIS a'ar) 2 A13 c%75.41.ASSEDa. ru.10.08 A RODE DIVA* INDEX RDu Am6SR 26_1E 02 NO" S6 6 TMw'^C4 R-I BB0S ME(2-1/2)WON ME V.laawm ma.Ru. PMONQ SD..51Nu(rm) M sun A OE.OETNa MISC. NOTES • RICmaR NC 1-1D1n 6ERAAAMN ar6m1 00*81 M www(SNDYD)SwuS 2 its Doan A MOON OEMS s"ON NPA,3-N SWIM.SYS.S M¢POM O PER CM OE ROT.ODRMNCE. =POO(6TA .ewu a Me CUSE a FNsra DEGAS ALE PRO SYSi[•• F ❑❑ SITE MEAL OW AEL6(AaoN SE.) TOTAL RIM NOFD PIS UDC 310.10. A13 STRUCTURAL TOTAL DNIS x p.m RAT LIMSTRUCTURAL COWS U I P=WE TOE V.NON-RATED ODMTRucno T 1IFRAOIB ONERAGE N6MN5- 1AN SE. 1MD61nE ❑❑ IONIC OESENATCN R®wRAL ra11-009 69111(w2-5) prom A TOE Nat- 16m2 5s. L . ..1ArDSCNE RAN _ CVBa: INN MEOW IMMO CODE In STATE O AA NE5LDns NT.BIRD6D 1t ONTS, duarsm SOORNa- 1,166 ss. awe: Qom. INN TIKES Tx Car TYPE 1: 2 1/2 STORES/46'(M'.IN 6PA.4N reel.NO SAL 21N6 SE GAL FML FM IOW.ACCESSIBLE,O MP.O 1911(FEDERAL) TOE 2 2 1/2 SI_C/46'(36'.1r RM.red 9,.r) COTERAG[PROPOSED: SN 9911 UNSAY Ruse COC a-, E AST.ONa0 iOWE Y" ATE N O MOOR Mt AnED a5wm 1�MD EO(WIC ro5) P8YL40 wawa E.F.(845) : 9s9 C- OR..OR AND P PI PLAN TYPE 1: 2 1/2 STOWS/35-E- TOTAL OPEN AREA IMES .OA n,1N S.F. C-3 WORT SE31w RM4 118E 2 2 1/2=RES/3r-0• c 4 .TER SO"CONTROL RAN 723650003509 723650003004 Ludlow Gordon 0 + Susan C. Randall Charles K. 2908 NE 4th Street 402 Idex PL NE Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 329180070008 329180069000 Gores Larry James Blondino Sandra L. 2801 NE 4th CT 2805 NE 4th CT Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98056 329180062005 329180068002 Bautista Alberto B+ Teresita Millett D. 2809 NE Fourth Court 403 NE Index PL Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 162305910307 162305913301 Atlantic Richfield Company King County P.O. Box 2485 500A K C Admin Bld Los Angeles CA 90051 Seattle, WA 98104 162305913004 King County Admin Bldg 2_4 se 500 Fourth Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 10•.‘° ' S 162305911404 Ck 136 Atalantic Richfield Co. P.O. Box 2485 ..,,. oox Z485 Los Angeles, CA 90051 Los Angeles,CA 90051 162305911701 Renton Housing Authority 970 Harrington NE Renton, WA 98056 a p CITY OF RENTON lia Planning/Building/Public Works itr� '��� ��~ 1055 South Grady Way - Renton Washington 98055117;441 .. : AUf 12'9 8 '= .Q_.Z 9 ; ' uJ cr �`c�Cd"uZ ADDR RVI QUESTED '`�Sc 4 3 9 E I Q cPANI , sT4I} i cc cc i i�tS 1 1"-r�� /ti fig-�Slh,r.� r ', , : r- sut;E r�,, , , 7,,,,..7.) .�, 8L1i fir!Gt? A 162305913004 tlRI1¢ .tij i�1 ♦tt+ .t k f ;VI: �r..'k '. King County Admin Bldg `' ` =y/ 500 Fourth Avenue Seattle, WA 981040. ELIVERABLE T„-f -- tibb� `� t nnWS ", ��� id Li s t.S AD PESSED < r (� e c7 co '.4''3LE TO FCP'•;4RD �t� RETURN TO SENDER ". z VI t1 T� 47 .�,; v-tu, s/-- :a2 1i11iiltlltill„tllllliliiiill,i lllilsiilfFslilti��ill11l!}11ltl,llf„I1i,1111,1 Cr CIT x• OF RENTON Wi '% Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator NOTICE OF INFRACTION DATE: 11/03/99 Infraction Index No. C99-0587 Location of Infraction: 2828 NE 3RD ST CHANTELLE LUXURY APARTMENTS Owner(tax-payer) : DEMPS ANNETTE Issued To: KEITH AND ANNETTE DEMPS Address: 2308 NE 24TH ST RENTON, WA 98056 An inspection of the above premises revealed infraction(s) of The City of Renton codes and ordinances listed below. The City would appreciate voluntary comp- liance or corrective action completed by: 11/22/1999 . Be advised, however, if voluntary compliance is not achieved, a Civil Infraction Citation MAY be issued, and civil penalties assessed in the amounts noted, for each and every day or portion of a day in which the infraction continues following the date and time set for correction. First Three Days of Infraction: $100. 00, per day. Second Three Days of Infraction: $200. 00, per day. Third Three Days of Infraction: $300. 00, per day. Each Additional Day of Infraction: $500. 00, per day. CODE SECTION CITED: RENTON MUN. CODE SEC. 4-4-040C4 DESCRIPTION OF VIOLATION: FENCE AND STONE PILLARS INFRINGE ON SIGHT DISTANCE CORRECTIVE ACTION: REMOVE THE TWO SOUTHERNMOST POSTS OF THE FENCE AT THE EAST PROPERTY LINE, AS WELL AS ALL CONNECTED LATERAL CROSS BEAMS AND PICKETS. THE TWO STONE PILLARS ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE INGRESS/EGRESS DRIVEWAY MUST ALSO BE REMOVED. IF YOU WISH TO REINSTALL THESE TWO STONE PILLARS YOU MUST FIRST OBTAIN PERMISSION FROM CITY OF RENTON TRANSPORTATION DIVISION AS TO WHERE THEY MIGHT BE PLACED. Issued By: ROBERT L. ARTHUR Land Use Compliance Inspector Planning/Building/Public Works Department Development Services Division Phone No. : 425-430-7269 DELIVERY METHOD [ ] hand delivered certified mail [ ] posted at site 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 This oaoer contains 50%recycled material.20%oost consumer �► - CITY „..IF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator September 18, 1998 Mr. David Fall Fall Architectural 4115 Southwest 106th Street Seattle, WA 98146 SUBJECT: Chantelle Luxury Apartments Project No. LUA-98-114,SA-A,ECF Dear Mr. Fall: This letter is to inform you that the comment and appeal periods have ended for the Environmental Review Committee's (ERC) Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the above-referenced project. No appeals were filed on the ERC determination. This decision is final and application for the appropriately required permits may proceed. The applicant must comply with all ERC Mitigation Measures and Site Plan Conditions of Approval. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (425) 430-7286. For the Environmental Review Committee, Jennifer Toth Henning Project Manager • cc: Parties of Record Mr. & Mrs. Keith Demps/Owners FINAL.DOC 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 era_-.---------•-:-- ,_a__.__:_: ,1„0, CITY OF.RENTON;; CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OFSERVICE BY MAILING On the 2"11 day of V kc u.ct , 1998, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing q a av- Dectsla-v\ documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing • Qav d Fall key avid lorvvAdc. tkotrs 'Cows lassvker Roce.Y- Lew is (Signature of Sender) rd% IC. Sc ,fir STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that l arc , signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for th(e uses and purposes mentioned l�>>in the instrument. Dated: c-c k, f ci5b � � L�;zyL.A� Notary Publi n and for the State of Washiratog Notary (Print) My appointmen COMMISSION EXPIRES 6/29/99 Project Name: C h3VCkGlIGi wA-k "I"' Project Number: Lua .90- 119 sic}_ ett NOTARY.DOC REPORT City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works DECISION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW& ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION DECISION DATE: August 25, 1998 Project Name: Chantelle's Luxury Apartments Applicant: David Fall (Fall Architectural) Owner: Keith & Annette Demps 2308 NE 24th Street Renton, WA 98056 File Number: LUA-98-114,SA-A, ECF Project Manager: Jennifer Toth Henning Project Description: David Fall, of Fall Architectural, has made application on behalf of Keith and Annette Demps, for the development of a 17-unit multi-family apartment project on a 0.89 acre site. The project will consist of three buildings, 2-1/2 stories in height, with parking for 32 vehicles. The proposal requires environmental review and administrative site approval. Project Location: 2828 NE 3rd Street Exist. Bldg. Area SF: N/A Proposed New Bldg. Area SF: 18,000 s.f. Site Area: 0.89 acres Total Building Area SF: 18,000 s.f. 7 I ��.Z � wf '1L1l , /y� �j \` `J/ W . . “ ! ,_.„L.;,_„., ,,_,. 04, • -._:;`,..7 '4:7:;:-. . 4 __0, ...._--141.1: Windsor ' ..° J FEaHPp.E. ili -a -* i �,i (���pIp:�Q I 1 High NE 4TH C.aI • w .'. r,.:el.V Park ¢., ,. x ,t. 1p _ �'ill 1?t 1 • al- I .2•r_ .... .— n. :\' �_ ' -__ 3-4TH Q _ T=+.+� __ _ •.�, L• / ..1 mi e Ixt4mN -- \ b. �nP extonN4 I 1 \ �p) / j COMMERCIAL a Lam,�'' rA0r05ED a 0 it NacH : - e \ ,•d ' : 04 Project Location Map SITERC.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Eni mental Review Committee Staff fReport CHANTELLF S LUXURY APARTMENTS LUA-98-114,SA A,ECF ' REPORT AND DECISION OF AUGUST 25, 1998 Page2 of 13 PART ONE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND The applicant, David Fall, has applied on behalf of Annette and Keith Demps for Site Plan Approval and Environmental Review in order to develop a 17-unit multi-family residential project on a site that is 0.89 acres in size. The proposal would consist of three structures, 2-1/2 stories in height. Two of the structures would be located on the rear of the subject site, and one six-plex would be located adjacent to NE 3rd Street. Parking would occupy the center and southeast portion of the site. The applicant's project narrative states that each building would contain six units, therefore, the proposal has the potential for 18 residential dwelling units. However, the applicant has stated that one of the units would be used for non-residential purposes, either as a management office, and/or recreation room for the residents use. Parking for 32 vehicles would be provided in garages, carports and surface parking lots. Access would be from NE 3rd Street. The project site is located in the Renton Highlands. Multi-family residential development (apartments) abut the site on the west and north, commercial development abuts the site on the east. NE 3rd Street defines the south boundary. Properties south of NE 3rd Street have been approved for residential development, but the projects have extended approvals, and homes have not been constructed yet. PART TWO: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW In compliance with RCW 43.21 C.240, the following project environmental review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. A. Environmental Impacts The Proposal was circulated and reviewed by various City Departments and Divisions to determine whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed development. Staff reviewers have identified that the proposal is likely to have the following probable impacts: (1) Earth Impacts: The project site is relatively flat, with a maximum site slope of 2%. The applicant has indicated in the environmental checklist that the proposal would include excavation of 1100 cubic yards of material onsite for the construction of building foundations. Approximately 220 cubic yards of structural fill would be imported and placed on the site in order to prepare the site for construction. The applicant's construction mitigation plan specifies the installation of temporary construction fencing and limitation of construction within the fenced area. In order to diminish the potential for erosion and to control sedimentation during clearing, grading and construction, the applicant would be required to provide acceptable temporary erosion/sedimentation control plans to the City, prior to the issuance of any construction permits. These plans are required per City Code, and do not require additional mitigation. A geotechnical engineering study was submitted by the applicant. The geotechnical study concludes that based on the subsurface conditions encountered at the site, the proposed SITERC.DOC City of Renton PB/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&En mental Review Committee Staff Report CHANTELLE'SLUXURYAPARTMENTS LUA-98-114,SA-A, ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF AUGUST 25,1998 Page3 of 13 buildings could be supported using conventional spread and continuous footing foundation systems bearing on native soils, or on structural fill used to modify site grades. Slab-on- grade or wood floors could also be similarly supported, provide recommendations of the geotechnical report are followed. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall follow the general recommendations of the geotechnical study (titled: "Geotechnical Engineering Study, Proposed Chantelle Apartments, 28XX Northeast Third Street, Renton ,Washington" by Earth Consultants, Inc., dated July 6, 1998). Policy Nexus: Environmental Ordinance (SEPA) (2) Air Impacts: Impacts to air quality can be anticipated to occur during construction and following the occupancy of the proposed project. Impacts during construction would include increased levels of airborne particulate (especially dust) from the disturbance of exposed soils. Construction impacts would be short-term in nature and would be mitigated through best management practices of the required temporary erosion control and sedimentation control plan (TESCP), and through the measures proposed by the applicant as specified in the Construction Mitigation Plan submitted with the application. These measures include watering of exposed surfaces to diminish dust impacts. Emissions from construction vehicles are regulated by the State of Washington and by City Code. Following construction, impacts would be associated primarily with vehicle exhaust from resident traffic. Vehicle emissions are regulated by the State of Washington. Overall air impacts would be relatively minor and would not be considered to warrant additional mitigation measures. Mitigation Measures: None required. Policy Nexus: Not applicable. (3) StormWater Impacts: The 0.89 acre vacant parcel would be developed with three buildings, parking facilities, landscaping, and driveways. The site drains to existing drainage facilities located in NE 3rd Street. Stormwater flows west toward Edmonds Avenue NE, approximately one- quarter mile downstream of the subject site. The proposal does not appear to present any impacts requiring mitigation beyond City Code requirements. Mitigation Measures: None required. Policy Nexus: Not applicable. (4) Transportation Impacts: The proposal for the development of 17-units of multi-family housing would generate additional traffic in the area both during construction and when the apartments are occupied. Construction traffic may include hauling of structural fill to the site and export of material. In order to mitigate potential impacts to the local and regional roadway network, hauling should be limited to off-peak hours, and should occur only between 8:30 a.m. to SITERC.DOC Cily of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&En mental Review Committee Staff Report CHANTELLE SLUXURYAPARTMENTS LUA-98-114,SA-A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF AUGUST 25,1998 1'age4 of13 3:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. The applicant has indicated that traffic control will be in place on an "as needed" basis during construction. The proposal would generate approximately 110 new average daily trips for the 17-unit apartment development. A Transportation Mitigation Fee is charged at the rate of $75.00 per each new average daily trip. The fee is estimated to be $8,250.00 for the proposal and is calculated as follows: 17 units x 6.47 trips per unit = 110 daily trips x $75.00 = $8,250.00. The fee would be due prior to the issuance of a building permit. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall pay the applicable Transportation Mitigation Fee, at a rate of $75.00 per each new average daily trip attributable to the project. The fee is payable prior to the issuance of the building permit. Policy Nexus: Environmental Ordinance (SEPA), Transportation Mitigation Fee Resolution and adopting ordinance. (5) Parks and Recreation Impacts: Development of the site with 17 new multi-family residential units would impact existing and future City park and recreation facilities throughout the City. In order to mitigate the impact of the development on the City's Parks and Recreation facilities, the City has adopted a mitigation fee of $354.51 per each new multi-family residential unit in the City. The fee is estimated to be $6,026.67 and would be due prior to the issuance of a building permit. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall pay the applicable Parks Mitigation Fee at the rate of $354.51 per each new multi-family residential unit. The fee is payable prior to the issuance of the building permit. Policy Nexus: Environmental Ordinance (SEPA), Parks Mitigation Fee Resolution. . (6) Fire Prevention Impacts: The proposal would result in the construction of 17 new multi-family residential dwelling units. Future residents would potentially have need for emergency services, which would incrementally impact the City's ability to provide fire protection services. In order to offset the impacts associated with development, all new residential construction is subject to a Fire Mitigation Fee. The fee is charged at the rate of $388.00 per each new multi- family residential unit, and $0.52 per square foot of new commercial or industrial construction. For the 17-units proposed, the fee is estimated to be $6,596.00, and would be due prior to the issuance of the building permit. In addition, the manager's unit/common recreation area would be subject to the Fire Mitigation Fee, and would be charged a Fire Mitigation Fee either equivalent either to an additional unit ($388), or, at the rate applied to non-residential development ($0.52/square foot). The Fire Prevention Division of the Renton Fire Department shall be responsible for determining the fee. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall pay the applicable Fire Mitigation Fee at the rate of $388.00 per each new multi-family residential unit. The applicant shall also pay the applicable Fire Mitigation Fee for the office/common recreation area. The fee shall be determined by the Renton Fire Prevention Division. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of the building permit. Policy Nexus: Environmental Ordinance, Fire Mitigation Fee and adopting Ordinance. SITERC.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Er mental Review Committee Staff Report CHANTELLE'S LUXURY APARTMENTS LUA-98-114,SA-A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF AUGUST 25, 1998 Page5 of 13 B. Recommendation Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommend that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINATION OF X DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE NON- SIGNIFICANCE- MITIGATED. Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. X Issue DNS-M with 14-day Appeal Period. Issue DNS with 15 day Comment and Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Appeal Period. Period followed by a 14 day Appeal Period. C. Mitigation Measures 1. The applicant shall follow the general recommendations of the geotechnical study (titled: "Geotechnical Engineering Study, Proposed Chantelle Apartments, 28XX Northeast Third Street, Renton, Washington" by Earth Consultants, Inc., dated July 6, 1998). 2. The applicant shall pay the applicable Transportation Mitigation Fee, at a rate of $75.00 per each new average daily trip attributable to the project. The fee is payable prior to the issuance of the building permit. 3. The applicant shall pay the applicable Parks Mitigation Fee at the rate of $354.51 per each new multi-family residential unit. The fee is payable prior to the issuance of the building permit. 4. The applicant shall pay the applicable Fire Mitigation Fee at the rate of$388.00 per each new multi-family residential unit. The applicant shall also pay the applicable Fire Mitigation Fee for the office/common recreation area. The fee shall be determined by the Renton Fire Prevention Division. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of the building permit. Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. General 1. Garbage and recyclable deposit areas and collection points shall be easily and safely accessible to hauling trucks. Fire Prevention Bureau 2. The preliminary fire flow is 2,250 gallons per minute (gpm) which requires one fire hydrant within 150 feet of the building and two additional hydrants within 300 feet of each building. 3. Separate plans and permits are required for the required sprinkler and fire alarm system installations. 4. Provide a list of any flammable, combustible liquids or hazardous chemicals that are to be used or stored on site. 5. The Fire Mitigation Fee will apply to the proposal at the rate of $388 per each new multi-family residential unit. Non-residential space for a proposed office/recreation area would be assessed at the rate of $0.52 per square foot of new construction. Refer to the Impacts and Mitigation Measures section SITERC.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department 110 Administrative Site Plan Approval&En$mental Review Committee Staff Report CHANTEYF'SLUXURYAPARTMENTS LUA-98-114,SA-A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF AUGUST 25,1998 Page6 of 13 of the staff report for more information. Plan Review -Water 6. A 16-inch water main is available in NE 3rd Street. 7. The proposal is located just outside of Aquifer Protection Area Zone 2. 8. The Water System Development Charge applies at $510 for each new unit. 9. The site is located in the Highlands 435 water pressure zone and has a static pressure in the main at 50 pounds per square inch (PSI).. 10. Water main extension, fire hydrants and DDCV assembly will be required to meet current Fire Code/Regulations per the City of Renton Fire Department. Plan Review - Sanitary Sewer 11. A 24-inch sanitary sewer line is available in NE 3rd Street. An 8-inch line is at the north property line. 12. The Wastewater System Development Charge applies at $350 per unit. 13. The side sewer connection to the proposed buildings are charged at $80 each. Side sewers are required to have a minimum slope of 2% to the right-of-way line. 14. A surface cleanout will need to be provided five feet in front of the building. Invert elevations should be shown. Plan Review - Stormwater 15. The Stormwater System Development Charge applies at $0.129/square foot of new impervious surface constructed on the project site. 16. A biofiltration system will be required if more than 5,000 square feet of new impervious surface subject to vehicular use is being installed on the site. 17. Storm drainage plan and temporary erosion/sedimentation plans must meet the requirements of the 1990 King County Surface Water Drainage Manual as adopted by the City of Renton. Plan Review - Transportation 18. New driveway access to the site will be required to meet current City Codes and standards. 19. One new street light will be required to be installed on the NE 3rd Street frontage to meet City Code requirements. 20. The Transportation Mitigation Fee will apply at a rate of $75 for each new average daily trip. Refer to mitigation measures. Parks and Recreation 21. The Parks Mitigation Fee will apply at the rate of $354.51 per each multi-family residential unit. 22. The proposed street trees specified should be replace with either Red Sunset or Scanlon Red Maple, to be planted at 30-feet on-center. All landscape materials installed in the public right-of-way is to be maintained by the applicant/owner. Strategic Planning 23. The density of the proposal appears to be 19.1 du/acre with 17 residential units. If 18 dwelling units were proposed, the density would be 20.2 du/ac. Allowable densities are a minimum of 10.0 du/ac and a maximum of 20.0 du/ac. Police Department 24. Police have provided comments regarding security of the site during construction and occupancy of SITERC.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Ei nmental Review Committee Staff Report CHANTELLF'S LUXURY APARTMENTS LUA-98-114,SA A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF AUGUST 25, 1998 Page7 of 13 the project. These comments are being forwarded to the applicant directly. Airport Manager 25. The ground level elevation of the site is 320 feet above sea level, 141 feet above the airport horizontal surface. Low flying aircraft may utilize the airspace above the apartment development, at all times of the day and night, 7 days per week. Development Services 26. Building heights are limited to 2-1/2 stories and 35 feet in the RM-I Zone. The applicant shall be responsible for limiting building heights to 2-1/2 stories per City Code. PART THREE: ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION - REPORT & DECISION This decision on the administrative land use action is made concurrently with the environmental determination. A. Type of Land Use Action XX Site Plan Review Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Conditional Use Binding Site Plan Special Permit for Grade & Fill Administrative Code Determination B. Exhibits The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing: application, proof of posting and publication, environmental review and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No. 2: Drawing No. M-1, Neighborhood Detail Map (Received July 14, 1998). Exhibit No. 3: Drawing No. A-1, Site Plan (Received July 14, 1998). Exhibit No. 4: Drawing Nos. A-10 and A-11, Building Elevations (Received July 14, 1998). Exhibit No. 5: Drawing No. L-1, Landscape Plan (Received July 14, 1998). Exhibit No. 6: Drawing No. P-1, Floor Plan (Received July 14, 1998) Exhibit No. 7: Drawing Nos. C-, C-2, and C-3, Site Utility and Grading Plans (Received July 14, 1998) C. Consistency with Site Plan Criteria In reviewing the proposal with respect to the site Plan Approval Criteria set forth in Section 4-31- 33(D) of the Site Plan Ordinance, the following issues have been identified by City Departmental Reviewers and Divisional Reviewers: 1. GENERAL CRITERIA: a. Conformance with the comprehensive plan, its elements and policies; The proposal complies with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Residential - Multi-Family - Infill (RM-I) and the applicable policies of the Comprehensive Plan. SITERC.DOC City of Renton PB/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Er mental Review Committee Staff Report CHANTELLE'S LUXURY APARTMENTS LUA-98-114,SA-A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF AUGUST 25,1998 Page8 of 13 b. Conformance with existing land use regulations; The project site is zoned RM-I. Permitted uses include multi-family residential housing projects with net densities of from 10.0 dwelling units per acre minimum to 20.0 dwelling units per acre maximum. The net density of the proposal approaches the upper limit of allowable density. For the 17-unit proposal, a net density of 19.1 dwelling units per acre would result. If 18 dwelling units were developed on the site, then the net density would be 20.2 dwelling units per acre and would exceed allowed limits. The proposal depicts a potential for an 18th unit, as each of the three structures would contain six units. The applicant and owner have stated that one of the units would be used as a management office, recreation room, and common area for residents of the project. The City would need some assurance, such as through the recording of covenants to ensure that the project did not result in the conversion of the office into a dwelling unit. If the size of the property was increased through a lot line adjustment, then it is possible that additional units could be added without exceeding the permitted density range. Development in the RM-I Zone is required to maintain a minimum front yard setback of 20 feet, while the minimum rear yard setback is 15 feet. In the RM-I Zone, the sideyard setback is established based on the width of the parcel. For the subject site, the required side yard setback is 12 feet. The proposal complies with the aforementioned setback requirements. The maximum permitted height limit in the RM-I Zone is 35 feet or 2-1/2 stories. Additional height may be obtained through the Site Plan Review process depending on the compatibility of the proposed buildings with adjacent existing residential development. In no case shall the height of the residential structure exceed 45 feet. Additional height (up to 10 feet) may be permitted in the RM-I through the provision of additional amenities such as pitched roofs, additional recreation facilities, underground parking, and/or additional landscaped open spaces areas, as determined through the site plan review process. The proposal would result in three structures that are 2-1/2 stories in height. Two types of structures are proposed and are noted on the plans and elevations as either Type 1 or Type 2. The Type 1 structure are shown as 35'-7" in height from existing grade, but would be approximately 30 feet above proposed grade. The Type 1 structure would be located closest to NE 3rd Street. The Type 2 structures are shown as being 37 feet in height above existing grade, but would be approximately 32 feet above finished grade, and would be located on the north half of the site. The applicant has provided pitched roofs, gables and modulation to increase compatibility with surrounding development. c. Mitigation of impacts to surrounding properties and uses; The project application's environmental checklist notes that some southerly views from neighboring apartments may be obstructed with the proposal. The two structures proposed for the rear (north portion) of the site would be setback 15 feet from the property line, yielding a separation of 25 feet from the adjacent apartment structures. The impacts to the off-site properties are unavoidable unless either the orientation of the structures was changed, or additional setbacks were imposed. The applicant should address the relationship between the two sites, and staff will recommend as a condition of site plan approval, that the applicant provide a revised landscape plan which incorporates plantings or other means of providing a transition between the subject site and surrounding uses. d. Mitigation of impacts of the proposed site plan to the site; The applicant's landscape plan is not adequate for site plan review. The type and amount of landscaping is not sufficient for the proposed development concept. Staff will recommend as a condition of approval, that the applicant provide a revised landscape plan for the site, subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division project manager. The revised landscape plan would need to be approved prior to the issuance of any construction or building permits for the site. SITERC.DOC City of Renton PB/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&En mental Review Committee Staff Report CHANTELIF'S LUXURY APARTMENTS LUA-98-114,SA-A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF AUGUST 25, 1998 Page9 of 13 e. Conservation of area-wide property values; The proposal is intended to provide affordable housing within Renton. Additional attention to site amenities and landscaping would contribute to the conservation of property values. f. Safety and efficiency of vehicle and pedestrian circulation; The proposed single point access from NE 3rd Street is appropriate given the size of the subject parcel. The location of the parking on the site is appropriate and is generally separated from the pedestrian pathways. A pedestrian crossing area is provided across the parking area. As presently proposed, the circulation aisle between the carport parking and opposing stalls is substandard. The two-way circulation aisle must be a minimum of 24 feet in width. The applicant will need to revise the site plan to accommodate Code required minimum standards. It appears that sufficient area is available for the circulation aisle, however, the ADA accessible parking stalls may have to be relocated to provide an adequate circulation aisle. g. Provision of adequate light and air; The orientation of the two proposed structures on the north portion of the site would result in shade impacts to the adjacent apartment structures to the north. The separation would be approximately 25-feet between structures. Since the proposed buildings would be approximately 32 feet in height, additional setbacks from the rear property line would not improve access to light. Reorientation of one or both structures would improve the provision of light to buildings north of the site, but could result in other adverse impacts to buildings on the west or to the subject site. Staff is recommending as a condition of approval that additional landscape treatment be incorporated on the site in order to serve as a buffer or transition between the project and the existing apartment buildings. h. Mitigation of noise, odors and other harmful or unhealthy conditions; The proposed garbage and recyclables area would be located in the center portion of the site, and would be enclosed by a wood three-sided wall. The location is adequate and meets Code; however, staff will recommend that the applicant relocate the dumpster to an alternate location in an attempt to free up one additional parking space on the site. Staff will work with the applicant to relocate the dumpster to avoid noise and odor impacts to the residents and neighbors. i. Availability of public services and facilities to accommodate the proposed use; and Provided that necessary improvements are installed and fees paid, adequate public services exist to serve the proposal. j. Prevention of neighborhood deterioration and blight. No deterioration or blight is expected to occur as a result of the proposal, provided the recommendations for an adequate landscape plan are followed. 2. MITIGATION OF IMPACTS TO SURROUNDING PROPERTIES AND USES: The proposal would place two 32-foot tall structures on the rear portion of the site, 25 feet from the nearest apartment buildings to the north. Existing views to the south could be affected, and the scale of new apartments buildings would result in a substantial change in view for the residents of the existing development to the north. However, the City does not protect individual views, and the proposal is similar in height and scale to other multi-family apartment structures in the area. The proposal incorporates pitched roofs, modulated building facades and gables to break-up the mass and bulk of the proposed structures. Additional landscaping between the proposed buildings and the existing off-site structures would help to mitigate the impacts to off-site uses. SITERC.DOC City of Renton PB/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&En mental Review Committee Staff Report CHANTELLE'S LUXURY APARTMENTS ' LUA-98-114,SA A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF AUGUST 25, 1998 Page10 of 13 Vehicular circulation and parking would not adversely affect off-site uses. Mail kiosks, common areas, and trash receptacles are proposed to be located away from the off-site uses. Lighting would be placed for safety and security, no spill-over light impacts would occur. 3. MITIGATION OF IMPACTS OF A PROPOSED SITE PLAN TO THE SITE: The proposed structures would be oriented to take advantage of views to the south and an afternoon sun exposure. Three residential structures and one parking structure would be located on the site and would not result in an overconcentration of buildings that would adversely affect the subject site. The applicant has proposed that open space be landscaped and used as common area. Staff will recommend that the applicant be required to revise the landscape plan for the proposal to achieve an appropriate landscape solution for the site and transition/buffer between the site and adjacent development. Fences and walls are proposed as a means of defining the site edges and entrance. 4. CIRCULATION AND ACCESS: Access would be from NE 3rd Street via a single driveway approach. Parking would be provided for in garages, carports and surface parking lots. The applicant will need to revise the parking slightly to meet City Code requirements for an adequate circulation aisle that is 24-feet wide. Pedestrians would be able to use pathways on the site to circulate from NE 3rd Street into the site and between buildings. A crossing area is delineated where the pathway crosses the parking and circulation area. By revising the vehicular circulation aisle, the pedestrian circulation system could be affected. The applicant will need to coordinate with the Development Services Division project manager to ensure that appropriate pedestrian access is being provided on the project site. The City's Parking and Loading Ordinance requires a minimum of 1-1/2 parking spaces for each dwelling unit. In addition, 1 guest parking space is required each 4 dwelling units. For the 17 proposed dwelling units, 29.75 parking stalls is required. For the approximate 1,000 square foot unit to used as an office/recreation area for residents, additional parking is needed. This is based on the requirement for a minimum of 3 parking spaces per 1,000 feet of gross floor area of office. The Chantelle Luxury Apartments requires a minimum of 33 parking stalls to meet the City's Parking and Loading Ordinance. Thirty-two (32) stalls are proposed, and additional area is available on site both near the entrance to the proposal, and where the dumpster is proposed to provide the needed parking . The applicant will be required to provide at least one additional parking space on the site beyond the 32 spaces that are currently proposed. 5. SIGNAGE: The applicant has proposed a brick and concrete monument sign at the entrance to the apartment complex. The sign would incorporate elements of a wall that is shown on the Landscape Plan. The sign would need to meet the requirements of the Sign Code, and separate permits and review will be required. XX Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. SITERC.DOC City of Renton PB/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&En mental Review Committee Staff Report CHANTEI.I.F'S LUXURY APARTMENTS L UA-98-114,SA A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OFAUGUST 25,1998 Pagel 1 of 13 D. Findings, Conclusions & Decision Having reviewed the written record in the matter, the City now enters the following: 1) Request: The Applicant has requested Environmental Review and Administrative Site Plan Approval for development of a 17-unit multi-family residential project. The proposal would feature three structures, with 6 units in each of two buildings, while the third structure would have 5 residential units and a common office/recreation room for the use of the residents and manager. Parking for 32 vehicles would be accommodated on site in garages, carports and surface parking lots. 2) Environmental Review: The applicant's file containing the application, State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation, the comments from various City departments, the public notices requesting citizen comment, and other pertinent documents was entered as Exhibit No. 1. 3) Site Plan Review: The applicant's site plan application complies with the requirements for information for site plan review. The applicant's site plan and other project drawings are entered as Exhibits No. 2 through 7. 4) Comprehensive Plan: The subject proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Residential - Multi-Family - Infill (RM-I). 5) Zoning: The Conditional Use as presented, generally complies with the zoning requirements and development standards of the Residential - Multi-Family - Infill (RM-I) Zoning designation. 6) Parking and Loading Ordinance: The proposal would provide 32 parking stalls on the site. For the residential component 29.75 parking stalls are required. For the office/recreation room, an additional three (3) parking stalls are needed. The applicant will need to provide at least one additional parking stall to meet Code. Sufficient room is available on the site to provide the additional parking. 7) Existing Land Use: Land uses surrounding the subject site include: North: residential - multifamily residential; East: commercial; South: NE 3rd Street and vacant, and West: existing multi-family residential. E. Conclusions 1) The subject proposal generally complies with the policies and codes of the City of Renton. Revisions to the Site Plan as recommended below, if implemented, would result in compliance with the Parking and Loading Ordinance and landscaping provisions of the Code. 2) The proposal complies with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Residential Multi-Family Infill; and the Zoning designation of Residential Multi-Family - Infill. SITERC.DOC City of Renton PB/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&En !mental Review Committee Staff Report CHANTELLF'S LUXURY APARTMENTS LUA-98-114,SA-A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OFAUGUST 25,1998 Pagel of 13 F. Decision The Site Plan for Chantelle Luxury Apartments, File No. LUA-98-14, SA-A, ECF , is approved subject to the following conditions: CONDITIONS: 1. The applicant shall provide a revised Landscape Plan for the site, subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division project manager. The landscape plan shall incorporate a variety of plant materials (trees, shrubs, groundcover, etc.) that would define spaces on the site, diminish impacts between the new structures and off-site areas, and complement the development proposal for the project site. The revised landscape plan would need to be approved prior to the issuance of any construction or building permits for the site. 2. The applicant shall revise the Site Plan to provide parking and circulation aisles that conform to City standards. The revised site plan shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division project manager and shall be approved prior to the issuance of any construction or building permits for the site. 3. The applicant shall revise the Site Plan to provide at least one additional parking stall. The revised site plan shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division project manager and shall be approved prior to the issuance of any construction or building permits for the site. 4. The applicant/owner shall record a covenant to run with the property that prevents the conversion of the Manager's Office/Common Area to a residential unit, unless it can be adequately demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Development Services Director that the conversion of the unit is in compliance with all applicable City Codes. EFFECTIVE DATE OF DECISION ON LAND USE ACTION: August 31, 1998 SIGNATURES: 7J ----- es C.Hanson, Zoning Administrator date TRANSMITTED this 31st day of August, 1998 to the applicant and owner: David Fall Fall Architectural 4115 Southwest 106th Street Seattle, WA 98146 Keith and Annette Demps 2308 NE 24th Street Renton, WA 98056 SITERC.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Et mental Review Committee Staff Report CHANTELLF'S LUXURY APARTMENTS LUA-98-114,SA-A,ECF REPORTAND DECISION OF AUGUST 25, 1998 Page13 of 13 TRANSMITTED this 31st day of August, 1998 to the parties of record: Tony Ladner Renton Housing Authority PO Box 2316 Renton, WA 98056-0316 Roger Lewis Washington Office, Asset Development Branch-OAHMP 909 First Avenue, Suite 190 Seattle, WA 98104-1000 TRANSMITTED this 31st day of August, 1998 to the following: Larry Meckling, Building Official C. Duffy, Fire Prevention Neil Watts, Public Works Division Lawrence J.Warren,City Attorney South County Journal Environmental Determination and Land Use Decision Appeal Process Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM September 14, 1998. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)430-6510. SITERC.DOC IMPOST.KCMG '• EXRbDe VW nATIAIE \ fASn IflS._>Lf-1rmE YOa 0.1 CLASS'C COUP RarMC 5/t.e CO. ° - z { r/a:TRR A pcz / - t•.GP MY - , i 15 • L._y. /--tR. - �- '---_"-- __ _ ^ L3L - _ III • ^—, ^ ,—e•e PT POST - — `1 I.UP A. f3'_ _-_-,` �� /� 1 Pill II 1,1=IL1,El .b- -f_Yrta ■� ,r TRM-MSOE I r�3 .-�—+asaxr-rit:- ,, ,_. . 4 7717.`-• O❑..! ... A.U[Ni IIIfir.S.t TOP eAR—.. , ' .' -{+na�Uy1-Taint¢ ---„- IT•(PE 21__ J r rreDNEa xaECOOEDr 11 v—l�? � liil 1,,, liil II to RMMe C D.C. 'ram __ ='•/ i s-- n '�i I:d Iu t / In1 / •-r�f-'"-__,• ,�`7 -'T '0` • AREA! �� ��Muao Trosr-nMc/N -�� P.T....POST• `•• j-y 1.'' .'• • D ,��•" I al••' e•-o'ac. \ ltti xv- FRONT ELEVATION Tr+ 'c%ml ,I•. '1 ^c?.1 (K.1. es„w 1M°w P.T...r.a.NOON all. 1 SCALE:t/e-r-O �► -- --- _ s/m Fmu a/a®AR .. -ti e�i ., me -MsoE } �.'`� I I r •` +'� '"� aNlta eo.a aAa¢SOMA 1 ,..^. net DOGE I 1 v __ l" j/ __ I •; I- . -- GIs 'Zle 7 1:.__ =-\''' .• SAI,1 IMP ti, .r ,•• a scan 1.11 II •!by8FRONT ELEVATION SECTION ��I/ ,�,� y r-- '=I • - GARAGE BEYOND , R/ ,/ H.YIS a OM[CONC.wax 1M. ....... _-__.. ______ Fe P.T.POST 1 I • '_ ^- 1 I, I, ph DETAIL AT FENCE �,r———:F saris eNup1= ® K ow END ELEVATIONS v — O• I ` p l ,� SCALE,, .,-r 1 : .1 S cwsarr-I ISM Ils1►- /.._ em>s,a anMa , "`y II 9a1 AN II DFr:'N/A, l/ - II eE1.,e/M - 9'-e' +�9 te'-0• te•-D- te'-D• `' -t, SfAx°Mn Tnlprlq / e Sau C.RSE- {:: , •. •a`'. • r --1 , -�. , II,...., b CHANTELL 1 (I `""D APARTMENT -- I I CONC.CURB M1 ' � sr us- nA►'aDY- � • ,-,^. ,' .• MC a roar® CC+� OO y - b `11 b IYE .q `� " �1 o i ,� 5 tieaCPETti ITOT - - �� INø6a1 ,`t f / ANNBCI'S D61Q raP a rox.rrLL - ,r.rr m mnallo s •oy --- r.,m •/////,I, ,III,: : N /�.• `/ •- e; A•AlOyf fMe.:A,9 •i - x rTGM a nu+O , II xr.IN/M —— /V� f / E90E IR-E4ih S T°Oar SOF , „ ,DUITfo r 5' _ I V� k�,y,,, III i ��.� Ir 0 i Ii OW..m(w:w � 7 I „� I i. ' / �/ I - snar�a n Fs nr - • AOD:SSiIE NwR — � c s �J v 1� ARM xa•� E• p E cm' J •e MXT iRATAFG ed P T POSt SEr M ./•/ ,t ry I c . TR.,N�+1-MQM H"'�1'. Mi0 TALL Or WJIAC: Y•e0r£G N0.F r/ ^/ _. CMG.TILL M1ERw.ixMAL Svuea = i (DASH+) '' • FOUNDATION PLAN — I K0,7°r«o _ ( ,__� ► - I`+ .'€ ,¢;;f ' , SCAM 1/1�,-D` �Y-r f S•-D' +'-r ACCESS..SW. �1, ) __ 4.19+..j STALL WON ,StE STALL ARM♦ 1' r " I i� . -� rr i�� I te'-r ,R-0' P.O.TO a a M Ir 0 I —r" _-'•. mIII.ji uxFj iANci( °R ATr.MRECDDrI TYPE I I i'�' T ��•/,I /� C L ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS •IMDSEa,aET .� —.. - - - - I , • rw NxR '�'.� E.T. SCAM 1/e--r-G• , •, 1 -+ / / o'"•"reraM OOP • 5Ma rzNRC ilyRE�.PM' " ``M��-- "\ -....;ES sfF*Ts-s I .,�31a��_/ e i+u25 cxORu/ -it 1 3'+,E TT�R,aws `w'� � `, F,61NC i/ /• , e 1 1 Y /'11.9_ / ,o i�pt� / / CFDM w 11111A.: . .. — � REWIRED ooaeoEwx�j aw /- l}▪ �,._-D.i .. . T,-D- /N SITE PLAN IMIEMPI ., 2.C O. y'0E ° ALL 0IN 0.0}f AAA /'S'-' "`• "', '�, I {nO / SCALE: I...p. ! SOIR 1 V TD iM IOlsa FLOOR PLAN (2 STALL GARAGE WITH 8 STALL CARPORT) _ • SCALE,/W-,-0 SITE • r r WOMEN MDs. SITE DETAILS '1�sn.er NOTES ET -� - DO � `. ,I—•5 altos i ly—• — TM.au 1 T-5� `oruiseJ F�r aka A I TRASH BIN ENCLOSURE JL ,— CHANTELLE APARTMENTS PRE—APP 98-29 I '+.I PART OF; El NW 1/4 OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 23N, RANGE 5E, WM I �r L, sa9�r•rE T� � t y ___ J I, - a CURB AND GUTTER SHORAN sEE DMA"A" - - „�L ,.,g6R1,74rW R 674 @7T.-,T`1 \ " DNEVER.DINER""s f i8�-- T- a-�� ,... }L� r \ ALTERNATE l �� 40UMMr (SC S USED `_ ---_ •1..; AM—PM Qe...NTH ATAxrtA 6TR. \�/,wd,,,,,.R (SEE STANDARD PLANS) $ECTI N A _ __ • _ 4Yf_Y ei+Or'w NIEL I A - "••r- 1 18� � i. > Man.06 SAL.x nKxO NOT TO MUD ia'CF=a MS THAN.0 CK+K.SHALL i ' I � ��J' • :�I f�: Diu ,. ,,;- SHALT"'r. .CANTS9 TO Warr :;�. _.X TROT r.D..T.R.,•T A.,R.,C. T�1 �`�IT SCORE LINE --JE %/•'// I _"19� FF..]t6.t5 JF If fl ','.I s\. \ a. a�cxc�Trt oLwro CIA: o wmOr Txv..r0.\�•.'\1;• / w8rem 1 / 1' I'T' I i 31923! k I t__ T. ATTROACH CENT.. u.a n.OMAHA.meStPROCTORxrtw.c CEMENT CONCEIT APPROACH 4 I I TT I . ,;./..,,,..„. I I„'I,,, E_' ,�N .HoTx. TH wu x o+Moen n,. u.Ka.i FOR DRIVEWAYS MID ALLEYS APDEETAIILPROACH«M IL n 11 n ADOPTED 9r.NDAHL uONOLIT1RC CURB tL L_ I n c J crrc or NRnon yr n n:,z/r• SEE NOTF 5 U J �,.: :, DAS NYC TRD,x ,P PAGE:T0o9 I s i i ; , •Pk,K9 T LRr";ra It IA JR > i ` o //� I i f--Ep PArEUENT µ)-�1M �k Gu1CRw w P '! 1!a Pl WI ®N `• (1 7 a) 3)6D l)9,{ , 1 ,R a %f• ' I..�_ 3151f6 11). ( nl 5Ar1CU) I BQ1f,5: V ¢ • i /! ,, I I n ?S 1 __-___ -_ NMI RATO.FRSTNG aaaxEs:r arARR Z h E a • . `— I. i I I ��. �"J r-m aa-� 6I'" I .+.• 'Al \• •m LD aYDD Eax a ouuaG PAVEMENT %9 / I I ' I' � ' ARTEPoAL STREET wwuVY Y LL" 3!S6, 1 ]L).O9.-_ I 1 3"CLASS'B'AC. eQr�x++ N T. "' 6"ACRUSNEO ROCK LLRA ' I' II um� I:E a I'CLASS ErSTREET ACLNRYURB k GUTTER REPLACEMENT DETAIL ' 1 uss•e•Ac. OPTTD .xR•.0,vNs JLT s+.r y_ I "`y •"E S ED ROCK Mr or RANON )c tai•. LEGAL DESCRIPTION J A /�%.' ` E I s�5ei I A3,�. I It. y R "-I. 1 Om we ETm R SP PAM TO. Q 1 'l' L �' lT I 3 . I , / LOT 4 REN.SP 384-79-7910189001 m - • gr1 i�� 31o)D. . Sza� __- I S)� ': SEE`414041ECTUAL DRAWING SHEET-A: PARCEL NUMBER 1 •/! '� 5_ --vE -- p Weir 3 I'OR TYPICAL BERN DETAIL AT BIALDINGS. y-Vy • .:i; I +/ 162305-9120-06 ;.` >"r • ` . „�-3T)BS I 31646 i ! , ,/r" QUANTITIES: !, I 316.06 1' ,/ .,�~• LOT SIZE: .89 ACRE �'rh, f R^�M g A I /AI' R�'DM"a I r"TT +•,�; T,r s-T sTUY w / •� / ASPHALT PAVING: 1 t,72a S.F. 1 M lip oe 0.4 CUT: ;{ ./1 _ } , V "L /r Slage P N65�E4'�,. �:i.ui:Jr.;A� /' PILL: ;i;', / '-.! VI 13 Lr+Y•PVC W Is ' �! ;��_Iv'��\11* .P'� 1E'-PTV,,i / INPERV.AREA: ^. R LT 36•0 CKP••07 A� i'�// • •4 NOT FOR BIDDING PURPOSES CB.n m 1 �E. J.TyTA M� .vs. s�i �s' 0 LE..KKR R,NN. E Fk ,,--,I I \k'. j'.' A ;4` i, /' DEVELOPER: -_ r'N 04 I 'i . / s INSTALL SIN w.wi.k ANNETTE DEMPS Q .'t,X, r y ty, r. / kewe 6WI 2308 N.E.24th STREET E3, cajxDL ss� ngE a;:-j el. wI.ms• •. RENiON,WA 98056 tyPRoviOE��MM'' A5 �� i RI �;r� ,J /N o. (425)226-6632 of -[iC11TR5`TAND/,'•. _��•I n4.f ice'�' TRENOKWAY k �� O . Ir.r T.310M CALL%KRA. 3�9 it.YN•CUM.% k CURBk WTTER / �•� SITE ADDRESS: z .�7•+r.PVC••Los i �.... II /• I. F CHANTELLE PLACE A / i CURL ��vr�Ae� �•F'' /'•' •f - ARCHITECT: 2800 N.E. 3rd STREET d ' I�v T�RFjCA� �� / • RENTON.WA 98056 �• u/ate/�3rd S /s - FALLS.W.ARCHITECTURAL1th 4ALL S.W. 106th STREET E.7 ,I sj/• 'bI� SEATTLE.WA 98146 ��I 206 431-7960 ( j ,VERTICAL DATUM - I Teu lt)ro ! •/ _ k ( ) \y;CHI Of RENiON wLr�, '"r_._. 6v:Hw ��� 9' ENGINEER: a.m.-IEDN F1936 0 N.E.4th ST. viz., -°- ��� _ GRAPHIC SCALE &1EFFCRlON AVE kW. _�T s • JOHAN OYE P.E. A AL,- 1.-y—G - s� `- :�__._—�� 12202 PACIFIC AVE S ELEV.-99.R6lB=716.704 AID r ..I TACOMA,WA 98444 C_1 e ` _ I' ?tlIN (253)537-8128 7Ni$PLAN SET IS NO!a SuavEr. 1. I • 0.0. I R 15 B1.1 IP L © _: 11 Y ,1 76 El OE-� - IS Swami INti AM 0 = —'1f 1 kni L NI, Milted ri TT o _ .. 11111Ililll -F - i- o � - = _ — �_ , = - a T = T T T T o _ = _ -=--- - - _ -- n END ELEVATION — TYPE 1 FRONT ELEVATION — TYPE 1 ' SCALE 3/16'.1'-0- SCALE. 3/16-_1.-0' CHANTELLE APARTMENTS TYPICAL EXTERIOR FINISHES TYPICAL CONSTRUCTION ASSEMBLIES for SEE SPEC/KOONS SEE SKR All 10R ASSEN180°ESCR1fOHS ANNETTE DEMPS [n[w0P w.us •iarcrv.SrFP rU L..° 1 HOUR FIRE RESISTIVE 1 HOUR FIRE RESISTIVE NOFI-RARED �«• O7 AlanpwpiNc s.uN ©'""'E SEED faPROR'& 11 aoPrO Nror Fl FLOOR-CEILING ASSEMBLY Wl PARTY WALL ASSEMBLY W4 E%TERIOR WALL ASSEMBLY 1.1^'' 2308 NE 24th St. ENuos0.F5 so IDR4 (p p i(M+vu CbY[p6 ��'.y'-A� �u u[SlathilEACTURPxVD""' O Yb w/1-UP ®;tilt sEM w/_SL `.oi to. .gom m.N R rTslmc r!l FNR 14MME iwEA I HOUR FIRE RESISTIVE NON-RATED 1P uvE0'`Wo O8 IEEE 000 ET tow ®E C vm[. si. FZ 1 r R L FIRER QSTAR WS faE[ iPG STAIR LANDING ASSEMBLY A WALL SSEMBLYRE AT FOITERETNNING WALL RIOR WALL ASSEMBLY ©CUTS'RNOOrrt+G crz,T. sr 0 NNR fMw...„, .N+oovs 10 REEIIY M'G wPELR NON-RATED NON-RATED NON-RATED ©a+°�?mcE°Mwso.E acu uA.�uc cosl ® g vEM na w- F3 EXiEfUOR DECK ASSEMBLY W3 INTERIOR PARTIIgN R1 ROOF-CEILING ASSEMBLY [ wProanCl Hoot wr pPE»iNc 1' o.E ASSEMBLY vNr-'.""w crso - P5 o+Ew s'NP SURFACE 5EC W1pOw sbcdnE Ems+ N 10 StE,wREO NON-RATED O WO GUARD EAR. NORICN F4 ROOR SCAR ASSEMBLY RIME ail\r. r ,,,,, 12 tt , — ri PAm w. ° �I 10P OF axANA F- f-__F___- -- ❑ I - ._I w 1 u I- --- _ -- I I u t CQ I unr a .� I �• uNR B t\ \ E[a --- ---. Ir III s q -_ _ _ �a 1�--� ® •Iii >; e M w. _ 0II .Drat Ar` - BU___- 1 - r _❑� ID i-l � s44 I :; - _ _ -- Q w mu.r[0ori. UFNT WFT1[ 1 y[J LINT A •�- _. - ' _—. I-- _ _Iv r • C qq rl I. MI mg.ovag Q ��Y� ��lE��V/J tlsxs0+r BUILDING SECTION A—A REAR ELEVATION — TYPE 1 SCALE: 3/T6-.1'-0- SCALE. 3/16-.1'-0- IT R @ I O EAST BM ]SAW' ES aDC:JS]M A°�©- N y y : lirtni_ :rill © �' 1.- PALL ICE IL R :_ le ,... O _ y � �e � ❑❑VILL Architect .r _ I5 ■ _ i t55, udMun BIM 0 Q _-=- — __--- == = ._adre,�rra � 1\ -- o © �I�I-N � l o _ i 10 _: _ :: _ _- =a _ _ _ Ie. MO 1 _ 11 • REST aoc,DrE.1r0,Ammo;Am*END ELEVATION — TYPE 2 FRO7VT—E'LEVATION — TYPE 2 4W 41V CHANTEI LE SCALE: 3/16'o1'-0- SCALE: 3/16'=,'-0' TYPICAL EXTERIOR FINISHES TYPICAL CONSTRUCTION ASSEMBLIES IK ST.E SREC0CADONS SEE STEEL.IS FOR.6.SE1ar OESCRPTAORG ANNETrE DEMPS 1 HOUR FIRE RESISTIVE i HOUR FIRE RESISTIVE NON-RATED O suRrtp�pt0°s*ERR ©'�'^ R. 631En°� c°yrD; fl FLOOR-CEILING A.ORREY Wl PARTY WALL ASSEMBLY W4 EXTERIOR WALL ASSEMBLY ..... I�.I m.w zWm,NE I Wun II uvLOSS ES TO NAPE PEAS R'i°E COMiMM6 Cpw uaE,Exr Ri z.t © I HOUR FIRE RESISTIVE O NON-RATED u..Rc rwE. rR. 0 .�I•w 12 rxr rxcE vExnw"uEi 1 HOUR FIRE RESISTIVE WS Ma io r00 ©MIK WIPER ER TRY 13 6T7,01�R- i O STNR LANDING ASSEMBLY STNR WALL ENCLOASSEMSURE AT R'NNIN RETAINING ASSEMBLY Osnva,RP'%JNL— wui DN,NpuMD OVER O WMS NON-RATED NON-RATED NON-RATED O gr.Tr s GUrfERs m ®g.oErn RUE cw- F3 EXTERIOR OECR ASSEMBLY W3 INTERIOR RARTRION R1 HOOF-CEILING ASSEMBLY 3 Dx x.e aaw EASCu SFiu wo twc POST r'WMRtRc Si MT ROOF a Al1ouF ASSEMBLY O MILL SASH RSCIORS- 0100 PO Sr4R Sfiat wASUR SEE WOOS SGEWtE DPW ID•11 MEASURED O NON-SLED OxanzanruEL f4 ELOOR SLAB ASSEMBLY 5 Ram GUARD PAL I . 2- 1IPl!1114 t . .,___,__,___________,_._.._ . .. ___ _ .__ _ ___,-,., _ . _ _, iimmta ��i I UNIT D nil .a� (III• W� a _ - �T 7 _ - ___a III Irk. 7 — df1 r���; T T 1' r- r n BUILDING ELEVATIONS h �Illlll' j�1 ,UNIT C -- -_ ` i .- t -- aUILDINOTE$SECTIONS eau �1 ,� n n ❑ o Peo.'A ii III .1 Ihhh1i!! CJ s.RRSH UNITC ODII /N9\ AA V7 [A 1 MI igh MI \AEI IJ Irk BUILDING SECTION A—A lazy REAR ELEVATION — TYPE 2 SCALE. 3/16"'.I'-0- SCALE: 3/16'=1'-0' 1 L CURRENT PLANNING.DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the zett day of Pu,qust , 1998, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing SRC. deTevriMv‘a touts documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing Department of Ecology Don Hurter WSDOT KC Wastewater Treatment Division Larry Fisher Washington Department of Fisheries David F. Dietzman Department of Natural Resources Shirley Lukhang Seattle Public Utilities Duwamish Indian Tribe Rod Malcom Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Joe Jainga Puget Sound Energy (Signature of Sender) SIPALtiaL. k. STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that, '„fit,-at . <`P-t signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for theses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: l_l e,t .Q S; / j 8 ( -72 7 � J Notary Publi ' and forState of the f Wa ton h V �� Notary(Print) My appointme i . COMMISSION EXPIRES 6/29/99 Project Name: Ghukettc. LV.keyLi Wp11, Project Number: LupT. 9Q• 114, S1Pr-KE,e[ • NOTARY.DOC CITY OF RENTON ;. Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator August 27, 1998 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Subject: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on August 25, 1998: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED CHANTELLE LUXURY APARTMENTS LUA-98-114,SA-A,ECF David Fall, of Fall Architectural, has made application on behalf of Keith and Annette Demps, for the development of a 17-unit multi-family apartment project on a 0.89 acre site. The project will consist of three six- plex buildings (17 dwelling units and one office unit), 2-1/2 stories in height, with parking for 32 vehicles. The proposal requires environmental review and administrative site plan approval. Location: 2828 NE 3rd Street. Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM September 14, 1998. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)430-6510. If you have questions, please call me at (425) 430-7286. For the Environmental Review Committee, J Ixtr, fif-fAivv.n Jennifer Toth Henning Project Manager cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division Larry Fisher, Department of Fisheries David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources Don Hurter, Department of Transportation Shirley Lukhang, Seattle Public Utilities Duwamish Tribal Office Rod Malcom, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (Ordinance) Joe Jainga, Puget Sound Energy AGNCYLTR.DOC\ 1055 South Grady Way -Renton, Washington 98055 �► ....Y CIT' OF RENTON . Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator August 27, 1998 Mr. David Fall Fall Architectural 4115 Southwest 106th Street Seattle, WA 98146 SUBJECT: Chantelle Luxury Apartments Project No. LUA-98-114,SA-A,ECF Dear Mr. Fall: This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) and is to advise you that they have completed their review of the subject project. The ERC, on August 25, 1998, issued a threshold Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated with Mitigation Measures. See the enclosed Mitigation Measures document. Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM September 14, 1998. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)430-6510. The preceding information will assist you in planning for implementation of your project and enable you to exercise your appeal rights more fully, if you choose to do so. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at (425) 430-7286. For the Environmental Review Committee, i Jenrfifer Toth nning Project Manager cc: Parties of Record Mr. & Mrs. Keith Demps/Owners Enclosure DNSMLTR.DOC 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 Thic nanar rnntainc F(1%racvrlari malarial 2n%fast consumer DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-98-114,SA-A,ECF APPLICANT: David Fall (Fall Architectural) PROJECT NAME: Chantelle Luxury Apartments DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: David Fall, of Fall Architectural, has made application on behalf of Keith and Annette Demps, for the development of a 17-unit multi-family apartment project on a 0.89 acre site. The project will consist of three six-plex buildings, 2-1/2 stories in height, with parking for 32 vehicles. The proposal requires environmental review and administrative site approval. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 2828 NE 3rd Street MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. The applicant shall follow the general recommendations of the geotechnical study (titled: "Geotechnical Engineering Study, Proposed Chantelle Apartments, 28)X Northeast Third Street, Renton, Washington" by Earth Consultants, Inc., dated July 6, 1998). 2. The applicant shall pay the applicable Transportation Mitigation Fee, at a rate of$75.00 per each new average daily trip attributable to the project. The fee is payable prior to the issuance of the building permit. 3. The applicant shall pay the applicable Parks Mitigation Fee at the rate of$354.51 per each new multi-family residential unit. The fee is payable prior to the issuance of the building permit. 4. The applicant shall pay the applicable Fire Mitigation Fee at the rate of$388.00 per each new multi-family residential unit. The applicant shall also pay the applicable Fire Mitigation Fee for the office/common recreation area. The fee shall be determined by the Renton Fire Prevention Division. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of the building permit. The Site Plan for Chantelle Luxury Apartments, File No. LUA-98-14, SA-A, ECF , is approved subject to the following conditions. CONDITIONS: 1. The applicant shall provide a revised Landscape Plan for the site, subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division project manager. The landscape plan shall incorporate a variety of plant materials (trees, shrubs, groundcover, etc.) that would define spaces on the site, diminish impacts between the new structures and off-site areas, and complement the development proposal for the project site. The revised landscape plan would need to be approved prior to the issuance of any construction or building permits for the site. 2. The applicant shall revise the Site Plan to provide parking and circulation aisles that conform to City standards. The revised site plan shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division project manager and shall be approved prior to the issuance of any construction or building permits for the site. 3. The applicant shall revise the Site Plan to provide at least one additional parking stall. The revised site plan shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division project manager and shall be approved prior to the issuance of any construction or building permits for the site. 4. The applicant/owner shall record a covenant to run with the property that prevents the conversion of the Manager's Office/Common Area to a residential unit, unless it can be adequately demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Development Services Director that the conversion of the unit is in compliance with all applicable City Codes. DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-98-114,SA-A,ECF APPLICANT: David Fall (Fall Architectural) PROJECT NAME: Chantelle Luxury Apartments DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: David Fall, of Fall Architectural, has made application on behalf of Keith and Annette Demps, for the development of a 17-unit multi-family apartment project on a 0.89 acre site. The project will consist of three six-plex buildings, 2-1/2 stories in height, with parking for 32 vehicles. The proposal requires environmental review and administrative site approval. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 2828 NE 3rd Street Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. General 1. Garbage and recyclable deposit areas and collection points shall be easily and safely accessible to hauling trucks. Fire Prevention Bureau 2. The preliminary fire flow is 2,250 gallons per minute (gpm)which requires one fire hydrant within 150 feet of the building and two additional hydrants within 300 feet of each building. 3. Separate plans and permits are required for the required sprinkler and fire alarm system installations. 4. Provide a list of any flammable, combustible liquids or hazardous chemicals that are to be used or stored on site. 5. The Fire Mitigation Fee will apply to the proposal at the rate of$388 per each new multi-family residential unit. Non-residential space for a proposed office/recreation area would be assessed at the rate of$0.52 per square foot of new construction. Refer to the Impacts and Mitigation Measures section of the staff report for more information. Plan Review-Water 6. A 16-inch water main is available in NE 3rd Street. 7. The proposal is located just outside of Aquifer Protection Area Zone 2. 8. The Water System Development Charge applies at $510 for each new unit. 9. The site is located in the Highlands 435 water pressure zone and has a static pressure in the main at 50 pounds per square inch (PSI).. 10. Water main extension, fire hydrants and DDCV assembly will be required to meet current Fire Code/Regulations per the City of Renton Fire Department. Plan Review-Sanitary Sewer 11. A 24-inch sanitary sewer line is available in NE 3rd Street. An 8-inch line is at the north property line. 12. The Wastewater System Development Charge applies at $350 per unit. Chantelle Luxury Apartments LUA-98-114,SA-ECF Advisory Notes (Continued) Page 2 of 2 13. The side sewer connection to the proposed buildings are charged at $80 each. Side sewers are required to have a minimum slope of 2% to the right-of-way line. 14. A surface cleanout will need to be provided five feet in front of the building. Invert elevations should be shown. Plan Review-Stormwater 15. The Stormwater System Development Charge applies at$0.129/square foot of new impervious surface constructed on the project site. 16. A biofiltration system will be required if more than 5,000 square feet of new impervious surface subject to vehicular use is being installed on the site. 17. Storm drainage plan and temporary erosion/sedimentation plans must meet the requirements of the 1990 King County Surface Water Drainage Manual as adopted by the City of Renton. Plan Review-Transportation 18. New driveway access to the site will be required to meet current City Codes and standards. 19. One new street light will be required to be installed on the NE 3rd Street frontage to meet City Code requirements. 20. The Transportation Mitigation Fee will apply at a rate of$75 for each new average daily trip. Refer to mitigation measures. Parks and Recreation 21. The Parks Mitigation Fee will apply at the rate of$354.51 per each multi-family residential unit. 22. The proposed street trees specified should be replace with either Red Sunset or Scanlon Red Maple, to be planted at 30-feet on-center. All landscape materials installed in the public right-of-way is to be maintained by the applicant/owner. Strategic Planning 23. The density of the proposal appears to be 19.1 du/acre with 17 residential units. If 18 dwelling units were proposed, the density would be 20.2 du/ac. Allowable densities are a minimum of 10.0 du/ac and a maximum of 20.0 du/ac. Police Department 24. Police have provided comments regarding security of the site during construction and occupancy of the project. These comments are being forwarded to the applicant directly. Airport Manager 25. The ground level elevation of the site is 320 feet above sea level, 141 feet above the airport horizontal surface. Low flying aircraft may utilize the airspace above the apartment development, at all times of the day and night, 7 days per week. Development Services 26. Building heights are limited to 2-1/2 stories and 35 feet in the RM-I Zone. The applicant shall be responsible for limiting building heights to 2-1/2 stories per City Code. NoTlriz • ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION • PROJECT NAME: CHANTELLE LUXURY APARTMENTS PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-98-114,SA-A,ECF David Fall,of Fall Architectural, has made application on behalf of Keith and Annette Damps,for the development of a 17-unit multi-family apartment project on a 0.89 acre site.The project will consist of three six- plex buildings(17 dwelling units and one office unit),2-12 stories in height,with parking for 32 vehicles. The proposal requires environmental review and administrative site plan approval.Location:2828 NE 3rd Street. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of either the environmental determination[RCW 43.21.0075(3),WAC 197-11-680]and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM September 14,1998. If no appeals are filed by this date,both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required$75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner,City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office,(425)430- 6510. • •�i•e'>e°i�v; i �q`��,i•.N f +�-,{may e7 !,./ 1 1 e 6-gf *f L--:;-_=_`;IPA r...Arr1. ,. , rp FI ei, •. . ,1 ,. k ,. ... , _ . .. 6 ,,. ., .___,..,..,_,, i • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION,PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON,DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT(425)430-7266. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please Include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. CERTIFICATION ��I, litot/T7 , hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document were posted by me in -3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on 4 60-r Z/iif • Signed: ��? Y� ATTEST: Subcribed and sworn before me, a Nortary Public,in and for the State of Washington residing i"i-f-5.2.-, --. , on the -3`h day of / `lW / )CG MARILYN KAMCHEFF COMMISSION EXPIRES 6/29/99 NoincE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: CHANTELLE LUXURY APARTMENTS PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-98-114,SA-A,ECF David Fall, of Fall Architectural, has made application on behalf of Keith and Annette Demps, for the development of a 17-unit multi-family apartment project on a 0.89 acre site. The project will consist of three six- plex buildings (17 dwelling units and one office unit), 2-1/2 stories in height, with parking for 32 vehicles. The proposal requires environmental review and administrative site plan approval. Location: 2828 NE 3rd Street. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM September 14, 1998. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-118. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430- 6510. r7e/t.(7 '''' i -4".;''Q•-•'''' :''"‘...V'lt'-.."3:31T:j';'-r0 -' ''''.* '''''''. 8 I i 1. i ^ 4 9 a5 r .WMbr • iEaUN . r.E< ,c /.P imis gg I 'I �I. Hilb I i R , N „i ST J'HSA?'S' M�Nt. ..ELT D. � ' r(� eo•.,',a . . I .:. Elft411Nb l —L \ A— PAa RTMENTS ._. b. L. 4 I. ej rncitora4� ' z' T. j j- APARTMENT', r1_ �� i r 1 ---\ NA4TH .I _ ,d•' d `T FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT(425)430-7286. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION IPlease include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. I CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-98-114,SA-A,ECF APPLICANT: David Fall (Fall Architectural) PROJECT NAME: Chantelle Luxury Apartments DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: David Fall, of Fall Architectural, has made application on behalf of Keith and Annette Demps, for the development of a 17-unit multi-family apartment project on a 0.89 acre site. The project will consist of three six-plex buildings, 2-1/2 stories in height, with parking for 32 vehicles. The proposal requires environmental review and administrative site approval. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 2828 NE 3rd Street LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. Environmental Determination and Land Use Decision Appeal Process Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM September 14, 1998. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: August 31, 1998 DATE OF DECISION: August 25, 1998 SIGNATURES: Uzi G 6 ire, - �'- $—7 g gg Zimmerman, Administrator DATE epartment of Planning/Building/Public Works c---_,C----___- -5--(11 ,.." (NO ) Jim Shepherd, Adminirator DATE Community Services (._—- • / e Lee eeler, Fire Chie DATE Renton Fire Department DNSMSIG.DOC • DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-98-114,SA-A,ECF APPLICANT: David Fall (Fall Architectural) PROJECT NAME: Chantelle Luxury Apartments DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: David Fall, of Fall Architectural, has made application on behalf of Keith and Annette Demps, for the development of a 17-unit multi-family apartment project on a 0.89 acre site. The project will consist of three six-plex buildings, 2-1/2 stories in height, with parking for 32 vehicles. The proposal requires environmental review and administrative site approval. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 2828 NE 3rd Street MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. The applicant shall follow the general recommendations of the geotechnical study (titled: "Geotechnical Engineering Study, Proposed Chantelle Apartments, 28)0X Northeast Third Street, Renton, Washington" by Earth Consultants, Inc., dated July 6, 1998). 2. The applicant shall pay the applicable Transportation Mitigation Fee, at a rate of$75.00 per each new average daily trip attributable to the project. The fee is payable prior to the issuance of the building permit. 3. The applicant shall pay the applicable Parks Mitigation Fee at the rate of$354.51 per each new multi-family residential unit. The fee is payable prior to the issuance of the building permit. 4. The applicant shall pay the applicable Fire Mitigation Fee at the rate of$388.00 per each new multi-family residential unit. The fee is payable prior to the issuance of the building permit. The Site Plan for Chantelle Luxury Apartments, File No. LUA-98-14, SA-A, ECF , is approved subject to the following conditions. CONDITIONS: 1. The applicant shall provide a revised Landscape Plan for the site, subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division project manager. The landscape plan shall incorporate a variety of plant materials (trees, shrubs, groundcover, etc.) that would define spaces on the site, diminish impacts between the new structures and off-site areas, and complement the development proposal for the project site. The revised landscape plan would need to be approved prior to the issuance of any construction or building permits for the site. 2. The applicant shall revise the Site Plan to provide parking and circulation aisles that conform to City standards. The revised site plan shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division project manager and shall be approved prior to the issuance of any construction or building permits for the site. 3. The applicant/owner shall record a covenant to run with the property that prevents the conversion of the Manager's Office/Common Area to a residential unit, unless it can be adequately demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Development Services Director that the conversion of the unit is in compliance with applicable City Codes and policies. DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-98-114,SA-A,ECF APPLICANT: David Fall (Fall Architectural) PROJECT NAME: Chantelle Luxury Apartments DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: David Fall, of Fall Architectural, has made application on behalf of Keith and Annette Demps, for the development of a 17-unit multi-family apartment project on a 0.89 acre site. The project will consist of three six-plex buildings, 2-1/2 stories in height, with parking for 32 vehicles. The proposal requires environmental review and administrative site approval. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 2828 NE 3rd Street Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. General 1. Garbage and recyclable deposit areas and collection points shall be easily and safely accessible to hauling trucks. Fire Prevention Bureau 2. The preliminary fire flow is 2,250 gallons per minute (gpm) which requires one fire hydrant within 150 feet of the building and two additional hydrants within 300 feet of each building. 3. Separate plans and permits are required for the required sprinkler and fire alarm system installations. 4. Provide a list of any flammable, combustible liquids or hazardous chemicals that are to be used or stored on site. 5. The Fire Mitigation Fee will apply to the proposal at the rate of$388 per each new multi-family residential unit. Non-residential space for a proposed office/recreation area would be assessed at the rate of$0.52 per square foot of new construction. Refer to the Impacts and Mitigation Measures section of the staff report for more information. Plan Review-Water 6. A 16-inch water main is available in NE 3rd Street. 7. The proposal is located just outside of Aquifer Protection Area Zone 2. 8. The Water System Development Charge applies at $510 for each new unit. 9. The site is located in the Highlands 435 water pressure zone and has a static pressure in the main at 50 pounds per square inch (PSI).. 10. Water main extension, fire hydrants and DDCV assembly will be required to meet current Fire Code/Regulations per the City of Renton Fire Department. Plan Review -Sanitary Sewer 11. A 24-inch sanitary sewer line is available in NE 3rd Street. An 8-inch line is at the north property line. 12. The Wastewater System Development Charge applies at $350 per unit. Chantelle Luxury Apartments LUA-98-114,SA-ECF Advisory Notes (Continued) Page 2 of 2 13. The side sewer connection to the proposed buildings are charged at $80 each. Side sewers are required to have a minimum slope of 2% to the right-of-way line. 14. A surface cleanout will need to be provided five feet in front of the building. Invert elevations should be shown. Plan Review -Stormwater 15. The Stormwater System Development Charge applies at $0.129/square foot of new impervious surface constructed on the project site. 16. A biofiltration system will be required if more than 5,000 square feet of new impervious surface subject to vehicular use is being installed on the site. 17. Storm drainage plan and temporary erosion/sedimentation plans must meet the requirements of the 1990 King County Surface Water Drainage Manual as adopted by the City of Renton. Plan Review-Transportation 18. New driveway access to the site will be required to meet current City Codes and standards. 19. One new street light will be required to be installed on the NE 3rd Street frontage to meet City Code requirements. 20. The Transportation Mitigation Fee will apply at a rate of$75 for each new average daily trip. Refer to mitigation measures. Parks and Recreation 21. The Parks Mitigation Fee will apply at the rate of$354.51 per each multi-family residential unit. 22. The proposed street trees specified should be replace with either Red Sunset or Scanlon Red Maple, to be planted at 30-feet on-center. All landscape materials installed in the public right-of-way is to be maintained by the applicant/owner. Strategic Planning 23. The density of the proposal appears to be 19.1 du/acre with 17 residential units. If 18 dwelling units were proposed, the density would be 20.2 du/ac. Allowable densities are a minimum of 10.0 du/ac and a maximum of 20.0 du/ac. Police Department 24. Police have provided comments regarding security of the site during construction and occupancy of the project. These comments are being forwarded to the applicant directly. Airport Manager 25. The ground level elevation of the site is 320 feet above sea level, 141 feet above the airport horizontal surface. Low flying aircraft may utilize the airspace above the apartment development, at all times of the day and night, 7 days per week. Development Services 26. Building heights are limited to 2-1/2 stories and 35 feet in the RM-I Zone. The applicant shall be responsible for limiting building heights to 2-1/2 stories per City Code. AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Charlotte Ann Kassens first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of the SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL 600 S. Washington Avenue, Kent, Washington 98032 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION a daily newspaper published seven (7) times a week. Said newspaper is a legal ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE newspaper of general publication and is now and has been for more than six months RENTON,WASHINGTON prior to the date ofpublication, referred to, printed andpublished in the English language The Environmental mReview Committee r►9has issued a Determination of Non- continually as a daily newspaper in Kent, King County, Washington. The South County Significance - Mitigated for the following proct Journal has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the Municipalnder Codehe authority of the Renton State of Washington for King County. CHANTELLE LUXURY APARTMENTS The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the South County LUA-98-114,SA-A,ECF Journal not in supplemental form) which was regularly distributed to the subscribers Environmental review fora development of (andPP g y a 17-unit multi-family apartment project. during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a The proposal requires environmental review and administrative site plan appro- val. Location: 2828 NE 3rd St. Chantelle Luxury Apartments Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision as published on: 8/31/98 must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM September 14, 1998. If no appeals are The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of$38.40 filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing Legal Number 5114 together with the required$75.00 applica- - / zi tion fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are / - ;4e'� governed by City of Renton Municipal v` Code Section 4-8-11B. Additional informa- Legal erk, Stu ounty J mal tion regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office,(425)430-6510. Subscribed and sworn before me his 2�ay of '�', 19 9K Published in the South County Journal j August 31,1998.5114 Citt-t----------'' / -/ tie�•an/IV' SUM F,�i•••% 1i, Notary Put�lic of the State of Washington :cps p07ARr 9Fs•: residing in Renton _r _ King County, Washington N: Wt!9 `I0••c_314j• •C1110•:• c,~��` i����7°f'WASN`;•` NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee has issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. CHANTELLE LUXURY APARTMENTS LUA-98-114,SA-A,ECF Environmental review for development of a 17-unit multi-family apartment project. The proposal requires environmental review and administrative site plan approval. Location: 2828 NE 3rd St. Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM September 14, 1998. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4- 8-11B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)430-6510. Publication Date: August 31, 1998 Account No. 51067 dnsmpub.dot Rug 21 98 01 : 41p JoF on Braund Design Gro (2nR1248-6589 p. 1 FALL ARCHITECTURAL; August 21,1998 David J. Fall 4115 S.W. 106th St. Seattle, WA 98146 (206) 242-6376 I (206)431-7960 City of Renton Public Works Municipal Building Renton, WA 98055 (425) 430-7286 office (425) 430-7300 fax RE: Chantelle Apartments Ms. Henning, Pursuant to the City of Renton Residential Multi-Family Zone (RM) requirements concerning building height (4-31-8 / 8.), I would like to further define the amenities that may apply to the proposed height of the apartment buildings in our project. In arriving at the building height measurements shown on sheets Al 0 (type 1) and All (type 2), I measured from the lowest existing grade elevation to the highest point on the ridge of the roof. These measurements indicate a height that is slightly beyond the standard 35'. Finish grade is aproximatly two feet higher at these points, therefore the finished building heights will actually be less than 35'. The buildings themselves have several features that reduce the impact of over- standard heights such as pitched roofs that are designed for interest and reflect the modulation of the building masses. Both building types have 1-1/2 story elements against the main 2-1/2 story mass that further reduce the aparent size of the buildings. In general, the buildings are very appropriatly designed and scaled to fit into the RM zone. In the interest of clarifying other concerns about the project, I would like to correct some parking design discrepancies on sheet Al and I would also like to indicate our current thinking about the design of a Manager's office and Common area. The parking layout has been through one or two revisions since preliminary submittal to the City of Renton, and there are a few left over notes on the Site Plan on sheet Al. Please ignore the "4 stall carport" note as there is no covered parking in that area currently. Covered parking now consists of(2) garage stalls and (8) carport stalls, all on the east portion of the parking layout. The Manager's office, currently located in the eastern building type 2, will shift to the opposite side of that building. Rather than design it as a living unit, which conflicts with Rug 21 98 01 : 41p JoF on Braund Design Gro (2nc1248-6589 p. 2 City of Renton zoning regulations (ref. sheet A6), we will propose a plan for various common facilities for use by tennants, in addition to an office for the manager's use. Please see the attached sketch. I hope this letter clarifies our intent and serves to bring the project more in keeping with the desires of the community as represented by the City of Renton. Thankyou and feel free to call with questions. ncerel , 4 avid J. l cc. Annette Demps • iy"—V Nv-nerg 2 -Z 41 9N 1� R jr CC a C r 1.'I v ^ -Li, Leiln r 4wr� i,V 1 a...te` Cr.: o o • 1! I 1 t E 'I o Z'p 5� Arita - , --),97.149---- E. ..(44/0-r- , i = !ct —cw-t).tr _,----_n ...„ 6r -2.7.:1) • a c62- d dY'7,° }4) C . )-9• i 1 -- �. tC -NVIi e- f ptirW*`v'} (1 nil \O City Menton Department of Planning/Building/ Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Pol`GG COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 20, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-114,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: AUGUST 11, 1998 APPLICANT: Keith Annette Demps PROJECT MANAGER: Jennifer Toth Henning PROJECT TITLE: Chan Ile Luxury Apartments WORK ORDER NO: 78412 LOCATION: 2828 NE 3rd Street SITE AREA: 0.89 acre I BUILDING AREA(gross): 18,000 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: David Fall, Fall Architectural, has made application on behalf of Keith and Annette Demps, for the development of a 17-unit multi-family apartment project on a 0.89 acre site. The project will consist of three six-plex buildings, 2- 1/2 stories in height, with parking for 32 vehicles. The proposal requires environmental review and administrative site plan approval. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet Eda/na eoname/2-f� ' 254"c f B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where dditional information is needed to properly ssess this proposal. /7/ e X I'Y) 7,i- Signaftire of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Re, 10/91 000 JTJc%z❑.❑❑0❑❑❑❑.❑❑❑000❑e❑❑❑-❑❑❑j❑000❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑ 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000001:00000000000000000000000O0000000000 000000000000 POLICE RELATED COMMENTS Citi/1GG- / /4*. 15.64 Police Calls for Service Estimated Annually CONSTRUCTION PHASE Theft from construction sites is one of the most common reported crimes in the city, especially in the highlands areas. To protect materials and equipment it is recommended that all materials and tools be locked up when not in use. The site will need security lighting and any construction trailer should be completely fenced in with portable chain-link fencing. The fence will provide both a physical and psychological barrier to any prospective thief and will demonstrate that this area is private property. Construction trailers should be kept locked when not in use, and should also have a heavy-duty deadbolt installed with no less then a 1-1/2"throw when bolted. Glass windows in the trailer should be shatter- resistant. I also recommend the business post the appropriate "No Trespassing" signs on the property while it's under construction (flier attached). This will aid police in making arrests on the property after hours if suspects are observed vandalizing or stealing building materials. COMPLETED BUILDING Each unit should have solid core doors, preferably metal or metal over solid wood with peepholes and heavy-duty dead bolt locks. The bolts need to be at least 1-1/2" in length when extended and installed with 3"wood screws. Lower unit sliding windows, including glass patio doors, will need additional locks; these locks will need to secure the panes from being pried out of the frames vertically. This means the locks will need to be placed into the top or bottom of the frames, in addition to any lock that limits horizontal movement. Alarm systems are recommended for each unit. There should not be any solid walls in any stairway or decking that would serve to limit the visibility and provide a place for a criminal to hide while waiting for a resident to return home. Extra security lighting needs to be installed in the parking lots, along the sidewalks, in the stairways, and between the buildings. Measures should also be taken to provide additional lighting for the common trash-dumping site. Each unit should have their individual unit numbers listed clearly, on the outside of the buildings as well,with the numbers at least 6"in height of a color that contrasts with the color of the building and placed under a light. This will aid police or medics who respond to a call in finding the unit they need to go to. Additional lighting should also be provided in the mail kiosk, as well as a trash can to dissuade littering. Landscaping in and around the exterior of the property should not be too dense or high. It is important to allow visibility. Too much landscaping will give the property the look of a fortress and make the residents feel isolated, and could also possibly give a burglary sufficient coverage to break into a unit. PROJECT LUA-98-114, SA-A, ECF Chantelle Luxury Apts. City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL&DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET (Continuation) Page ❑ PAGE 020 of❑ NUMPAGES \* MERGEFORMAT 020 ❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑ ❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑ Trespass Jy �rt l: USINES Enforcement WATCH Quite often, business owners and managers are faced with crimes that occur on the property after the businesses are closed and the employees have gone home. Some of the crimes that occur are burglary, vandalism, graffiti, trespassing, drug dealing and robbery in the parking lots. There is a way for police and business owners to discourage these types of crimes from taking place on private property, and that is by enforcing the City of Renton's Municipal Trespass Code 6-18-10. In order for police to be able to make an arrest for Trespass, business owners or managers need to purchase signs and display them in conspicuous areas on the property. These signs need to include the following language: 1. Indicate that the subject property is privately owned and; 2. Uninvited presence on the specified property is not permitted during the hours the business is closed, and; 3. Violators will be subject to criminal sanctions pursuant to Renton City Code 6-18-10. MOST IMPORTANTLY-THE SIGNS SHOULD BE CONSPICUOUS FROM ALL POSSIBLE POINTS OF ENTRY TO THE PROPERTY, AND ALSO BE PLACED ON THE EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDINGS. This way when a suspect is arrested, he/she will not be able to claim as a defense that he/she did not know he or she was trespassing. EXAMPLES FOR TRESPASS SIGNS: NO TRESPASSING NO TRESPASSING This is private property. Persons without specific No Trespassing after business hours business are not authorized to be on the premises between (insert specific times). Anyone on the the hours of(insert the hours your business is closed). premises after business hours is subject to Violators are subject to arrest and/or citation for criminal arrest and/or citation for Criminal Trespass pursuant to Renton City Code#6-18-10.. Trespass and/or impoundment of vehicle. Per Renton City Code #6-18-10. By enforcing the Trespass Ordinance, business owners and police will be sending a message to criminals that they are not allowed to conduct criminal activity on the property. In making arrests for Trespass, police may be preventing the more serious crimes from taking place. 1Y � COURTESY OF RENTON POLICE DEPARTMENT -�� CRIME PREVENTION UNIT 235 - 2571 • City !en ton Department of Planning/Building/F,.,,„. Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: �%%TO ,9— COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 20, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-114,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: AUGUST 11, 1998 APPLICANT: Keith &Annette Demps PROJECT MANAGER: Jennifer Toth Henning PROJECT TITLE: Chantelle Luxury Apartments _WORK ORDER NO: 78412 LOCATION: 2828 NE 3rd Street SITE AREA: 0.89 acre I BUILDING AREA(gross): 18,000 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: David Fall, Fall Architectural, has made application on behalf of Keith and Annette Demps, for the development of a 17-unit multi-family apartment project on a 0.89 acre site. The project will consist of three six-plex buildings, 2- 1/2 stories in height, with parking for 32 vehicles. The proposal requires environmental review and administrative site plan approval. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth ✓ Housing ✓ Air ✓ Aesthetics ✓ Water r Light/Glare ✓ Plants ✓ Recreation ✓ Land/Shoreline Use ✓ Utilities ✓ Animals / TransportationI.— Environmental Health ✓ Public Services ✓ Energy/ 1 Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment YE-5 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet NO The ground elevation of the site is 320' above sea level , 141 ' ABOVE the airport Horizontal Surface. Low flying aircraft may utilize the airspace above the apartment development, at all times of the day and night, seven days per week. Approval of this development shall be considered an acknowledgement that the use is compatible with the operation of the airport and the use of the airspace surrounding the airport. B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS None C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS None We have reviewed this applicai.n with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additi.-. information i- eded to properly assess this proposal. ' 'I , r .� i8( tq�'S Signature o rector or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.I•, Re. t0/93 CITY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION MASTER APPLICATION PROPERTY OWNER(S) PROJECT INFORMATION • Note: If there is more than one legal owner, please attach art additional notarized Master Application for each owner. PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: NAME: KEITH AND ANNETTE DEMPS CHANTELLE LUXURY APT HOMES PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION: ADDRESS: 28xx NE 3RD STREET 2308 NE 24TH RENTON, WA 98056 KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): CITY: ZIP: RENTON 98056 H 162305-9120-06 TELEPHONE NUMBER: EXISTING LAND USE(S): 1 ate« 425-226-1444 VACANT LAND 32 / ASL APPLICANT (if other than owner) PROPOSED LAND USES: NAME: DAVID FALL APARTMENT COMPLEX COMPANY (if applicable): EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: FALL ARCHITECTURAL N/A ADDRESS: 4115 SOUTHWEST 106TH ST. PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): N/A DEV! I CITY: ZIP: EXISTING ZONING: �"�`�` NT ni SEATTLE 98146 Ci7y )� n�1y v • RM-I TELEPHONE NUMBER: Jill (206) 242-6376 PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): N/A ' CONTACT PERSON SITE AREA (SQ. FT. OR ACREAGE): NAME: DAVID FALL .89 ACRE OR 38,804 sq ft • COMPANY (if applicable): PROJECT VALUE: FALL ARCHITECTURAL $1 ,355,517. ADDRESS: IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? 4115 SOUTHWEST 106TH T. YES CITY: ZIP: SEATTLE 98146 IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA? TELEPHONE NUMBER: 206-431-7960 NO 206-242-6376 ----_- --_ - P-_ A Oh Yi.'f: ,__________- _______________ :_:-._:_:_:_:_:_:_:_,_,_:_,_:_:_,..:_: f. ! , /I : i 17\--:::-:-.:-.:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-.:-7.-:-:-:-.:-:.-.7-.:-.7-_- ...';1''' ---------------7.-:-:-7.-:-:-:-.:-:-H-- 'IIIINI li 7 I .Ilk I 1 , L' it.y! ., 1:::_=_-4-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-.-.-:-:-.-7.-:-----_-_-_-_-1-_-ktr—c--------------noAll i,.,±_ JF16:\ _=___=_-=__ {/}}rw irrir�__r_____�r===___ --_----__ �_ .L.�.. •ilif �1 __M_a ram . r-z==-- - "==__==___.- _- 1 :=PIMP ` - - " . , fee 1 •E-.:-:-:-:.---.7-:-:-Z-:-:-:.-=-:-:-:.-7.-:-:----:-:-:.-7.-:-:-:.-:-:-.:-:-:-:-2-:-.:-:-:-:-.7-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-2-:-7.-.:-:-.7-:-.7-:-:. Ili-=".1. -: U \ _ 11;1111.1,___,\_____ .. -::::_:-::::::::::_::_::_:::;-::::::_-:_:_::-:_z_::_::_:_:::::;:_l__--:::::t2=3::-4-arty ::::-::-..-;_::_::_:::::_:‘," gilliT ." — Pli V:::E:::::;E:::::1:::::::E:::::::::::::::::: ::;:fy t.7:E.C.:.......r....:---H,:,:.:-...-----...:.y.r.r.E.........:,:=---- - 11 I I• • i k k \ I r. n\ s 26,--.1,.__-----7---:----::::::K.:35:K.g.-_v::::::33::::KKH:::::::::3-K.:E.::::::::.:F.:8E:K.:::-.0.7 :::::::::::::::NA ir . m.1.,.-...f. t...„,- .. ‘‘, ,. ...-....,04, ..1 „e____,-z- • .1 1 7 ._. ajj, . • k0 21... -7., • 1, , Ira j, u N sow( )6,-; --:-:-:-:-:-:-7.-__,:-:-.:-:-:-:-:-:-.:-:-.-.-2-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:- _:_:_:_:_:_:_ ,Poff o�►��o���o.�==_____== -=__=_-_____ = =f. REF 49 . 2. .- rrarg .. J gram- .� o - _-------- ftii a Y arc oo M -=_ =---- 1 i M1 �l--- 11111 • .... t4.11 ji ....•Ink aall(M Ei . . . \\7 C'... -e;h114.l'r,A1 121::4-1111. . f- I—! I..r. r CTJ e.7I t/1)11 211 U ELT 1:1 .-. IT. IJUOIri-1-1)..TI-L-Sa . 1' ' . zr.,, 14. ... . ix ...t,c _____, E____IrTin -i X „I "(Cik. L l• . t.- -- l-liu ,: II II -�21,,L ■1:= un QR7, A . _ a-a I.+ IL .... �� �i1 C1_�..�4�7Y_ •. jilt . ro. - ate! willi.if • a �• O � . f v-. T. r �• ►� •' Y • Y AI �,� eii_ .C �!I�. er > iii ,o,< a o�. -14: , • ,ram( �, ®� Val!h* L 1:�:: iI, - fop MI- /` 1 h 1 I ---, -,T" Jqrt:1.4- . ifill .0,41/ Aili-oli " ' FE � • .° ft,:1111"WAf i n �. Allipp ` � � � Itil�a( �F . 0NIT ems-, ± _ ..., tfr i Pr 11 gi , ., . r c, 11 i 1 i 1 ,I,,,,Tcom TA"`itz4 7„ ,_, 40 (/ 11115.111..c, ...0.. ..._ ,-.4. im It-to- ----,,,,'17-. ,,..,,,_ I,.,,,,,,..,,,,,--,,,,,..., ' 111111111111% W-I , ,,_,.. , , __ .,„ si,,,,„„_,,,—, \Ili; si., .. . ' \ 2t11.;•-;;;arlicmi IC1!ri-.-11 )(1 7 . [ C° 1 ".1 rilai'.7-4/- 11 1 Irbli'. . lir; -i \\\\ r44 ' 6 11:11. .., • AM. 113ift./.11t,,,, 1p, . )-,. , , cr' 4 IA U.. 1 IlI If 1 �� irgMIMM./� .Y- I IIIIrlipl1,17,4 IL' Mot. C0 I 1 f cgt.I_Ail .-. L.27 I a' i iii(i' , • i [if Or. , \.,, IL A oi al fY , u�^ i 1 II / n \� / // J jA-'. 4,i, 4 • NAP ' Sr 1� UU I`��(,UI� ,.., 4 ..[ a TIIIIII lPiic--: .J... ` i ,�+ , tY MS ( � Yl"fP _ r. 1 af w TM" �1.•". 1.P-P h . r-� r' \ _ 6 1 ., $ ....... ,•,..,.'.:M_.^e .. ' ,84•62-6•3 _.•: 24 ..2,...> ..0-.„,i/<v,,,,• r 5 7ne.4 6 z L,9;•,,,0,/28b1r4',7.:;,5-,',,0,-. ,,,, "•••4•.9...,.j C....T....I.p %.?i'c 4•,'" -----..,.......... .., ° A L P 0 III ,- ‘N- ,,(s.' ,c` ...-• '. 22 =;.,' ; • . pl 46 ' 62 ;-••: i.-.TF-.- • VOG - TE I • , ,i• 0. _.; 15 5 „.1,.. 0 ,r-44,-, ..., .....- , '-^ 52 53 ,i 54 F.. 99.5 4 • --.•- .• I 4"." .1 In ---- -- TO" INS' -7,.. dO 16 63'6 r.\5•‘' '" &-o. ..-Li g 1 FEm\I'D r• .\z,-,, ---, ,-§, e,' ..:•1' ,- 0 74.4 ,,,,, irti 4-- 4-1V. J-2 55 vt-9 63.. tsvys,, , - • . ; 0., 0,) 4%7 ,u 1.1 I C 4 L ... ,., It , * e.., N.E. 4TH CT , ,,N, 4 ; 69 s.°X %,,,i °vI. .: .i'i Aom. scot,. 7: .6- (24 7 , 1 L'U .I.' t.^.7,2• " 1' 75 '3045' t It.. ,4_412 --.• ., L.. t z % b i tr • :. 0 1,.. ....,,z.,-,, 1 1 -- 80 '-•• 79 78 77 * 76 -a- 75 64 :?-% ;; _ 75 .1 it175. 74.44 79•48 i .l.?"--,z"- qz-lz -) . 75 76.:3 ...LW 5 '.. ico 4, 6o v*, :5IZ.0; _ 31'' ...41,..!.: '‘.:+ t"‘.." •rr!•Ik-! .....kv,-....... .. . E.4.,:... .`!;',.:ii..-...,*.,--- -;-7=4.TH ,,...m.,....c,--, -... 777-7,,--,.--.FisTrri-..4-.42.:7•_.-nt.:47. -1.0!.,..`"r•Tr s'.-411ri?!..P'4.?"." .'15."""it's;!..,..a .;*!:71'int.....,...,.,,.. tur1.-Lin...Lr-Lj.I ti:,iitl,....Y.1) ,"'-'-' ," ! Z r ke Az .CT 0 RV, k"[Itir I , - ; • . ------- S.R.373-79 I . 1 ..., ....,_. ; •-,• . ....: ww.,-?- ... - /// /.., .;1_ IAD •.. , ..,.., _ ;______ ., ,,,,, (I, • .„,.. ,..,6 ........ ,, „ ... 382-79 , 41, 1 fir6) ' . I ..1 - 1 'I iCoot.:. 1/40°_,......961•/ t I // 8 0, 12`...,, 1, ---i IN Ill , , , Ft g I P' 6 .1 t 1Y--. ‘\\••• i/ ry P A . . I i • S.P. 23-88 / :•::' r , ) (3 (4) ., w. 1 I 1 i 4 ! • I . i /37Z8 I A /.3/62 /, (4M N6 .....% .. , . STATE AfillAKTH EN nip 1 10.54 Ac :57z IP. 0,50"1,0 5.6- (.0. 001-7° i 1i i; 19 / / / ,-;-,-; 1 q / / _ __-- I, / ------ - -N I / / 1 I 'S ..--""--'---'---------------"-- " g° '' 6 klOTIN6 1i ........ / 111114-1 / 1•1. - ___-------- r.---- ,3.,-s,, / TINO GUGINI .0 KING COUNTY / 03 couNi, .z t. / / // /FIRST INVEST I ; i -1 os6 co,RIO 1444 Ac AppdagaNsAire„ , / _. ,.1/ / / i g DP° ..... IF• , ...- 50°P5 ' // ALBERT S. BALCH 1 / I 14 05 1-• Ac. 2 L__I / /,. / t, L. E E / / :- ! / / A V //I / • / ,/' i I/ I / 41,// -.•.,.)., .I4 o / r e i • fi 1 •------- 1695.70 I _ 452 / / //,' / —---"--- City enton Department of Planning/Building/Fuiuc;Works ENVIRONMENTAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 1:)a4,46 COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 20, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-114,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: AUGUST 11, 1998 APPLICANT: Keith &Annette Demps PROJECT MANAGER: Jennifer Toth Henning PROJECT TITLE: Chantelle Luxury Apartments WORK ORDER NO: 78412 LOCATION: 2828 NE 3rd Street SITE AREA: 0.89 acre BUILDING AREA(gross): 18,000 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: David Fall, Fall Architectural, has made application on behalf of Keith and Annette Demps, for the development of a 17-unit multi-family apartment project on a 0.89 acre site. The project will consist of three six-plex buildings, 2- 1/2 stories in height, with parking for 32 vehicles. The proposal requires environmental review and administrative site plan approval. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS Ca)77/7)-10c/ - ' 'p` a�iazr-A-doiv cy-72u� .aea — ��'`��� � � ,lie rl-�G=� � e� � Co�.P�- 4 ,&.-2 ON 61° I35 5/ C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS ee�/3 C- / K We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additio sal information is need to properly assess this proposal. (7)-2C-r> /2/77Y big ure of Director or uth rized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Re, tOras City ... .?enton Department of Planning/Building/, u.,,,c Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: *.ohcV►ot tc_ Pekteto Nt COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 20, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-114,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: AUGUST 11, 1998 APPLICANT: Keith &Annette Demps PROJECT MANAGER: Jennifer Toth Henning PROJECT TITLE: Chantelle Luxury Apartments WORK ORDER NO: 78412 LOCATION: 2828 NE 3rd Street SITE AREA: 0.89 acre ( BUILDING AREA(gross): 18,000 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: David Fall, Fall Architectural, has made application on behalf of Keith and Annette Demps, for the development of a 17-unit multi-family apartment project on a 0.89 acre site. The project will consist of three six-plex buildings, 2- 1/2 stories in height, with parking for 32 vehicles. The proposal requires environmental review and administrative site plan approval. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where ad -' nal informa ialt i eeded to properly assess this proposal. ,,, V I(//9 Ki., Signature of r tor or Auth r' ed Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev 10/93 Net density for the Chantelle Apartments: A density determination is dependent upon the number of units to be built. With this development, it is stated to be "an 17 unit apartment project with a Manager's unit on a site of 0.89 acres." So, depending on how you count the"Manager's unit,"this development is either 17 or 18 units. Basing calculations on 17 units, the net density would be 19.1 du/ac. Basing it on 18 units, net density would be 20.2 du/ac. R ! RT FIRE PREVPENTO - Fi Tirp E BUDFPREAU City or Kenton Department of Planning/Building/f-uu.i; Works ENVIRONMENTAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REV E-r/z � ET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: --tve fte1lek'Cf rP COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 20, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-114,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: AUGUST 11, 1998 APPLICANT: Keith &Annette Demps PROJECT MANAGER: Jennifer Toth Henning PROJECT TITLE: Chantelle Luxury Apartments WORK ORDER NO: 78412 LOCATION: 2828 NE 3rd Street SITE AREA: 0.89 acre I BUILDING AREA(gross): 18,000 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: David Fall, Fall Architectural, has made application on behalf of Keith and Annette Demps, for the development of a 17-unit multi-family apartment project on a 0.89 acre site. The project will consist of three six-plex buildings, 2- 1/2 stories in height, with parking for 32 vehicles. The proposal requires environmental review and administrative site plan approval. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet �(<i B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS ,Pt C. CODE-RELATED Add We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is eeded to property assess this proposal. 077/ igna of Director or Authorized presentative Date DEVAP .DOC ✓✓✓ Re+.10/93 O et CITY OF RENTON FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU - NTC� MEMORANDUM DATE: August 12, 1998 TO: Jennifer Toth Henning, Planner FROM: Jim Gray, Assistant Fire Marshal V SUBJECT: Chantelle Luxury Apartments, 2800 Blk. NE 3rd St. Fire Department Comments: 1. The preliminary Fire flow is 2250 GPM which requires one fire hydrant within 150 feet of the building and two additional hydrants within 300 feet of the each building. 2. Separate plans and permits are required for the required sprinkler and fire alarm system installations. 3. Provide a list of any flammable, combustible liquids or hazardous chemicals that are to be used or stored on site. 4. A fire mitigation fee of$6,984.00 is required based on $388.00 per unit. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL &DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Reviewing Department Water Comments Due: AUGUST 20, 1998 Application No.: LUA-98-114,SA-A,ECF Date Circulated: August 11, 1998 Applicant: Keith&Annette Demps Project Manager: Jennifer Toth Henning Project Title: Chantelle Luxury Apartments Work Order No: 78412 Location: 2828 NE 3rd St. Site Area: 0.89 Acre Building Area(gross): 18,000 sq. ft. A. Environmental Impact(e.g.Non-Code) Comments No Comment. B. Policy-Related Comments No Comment. C. Code-Related Comments Water main extension, fire hydrants and DDCV assembly will be required to meet current Fire Code/Regulations per City of Renton Fire Department. The site is located in the 435 pressure zone and has a static pressure in the main at 50 PSI (435 P.Z. - 317 elevation of the site x .43 - 50.74 psi). The site will require three(3)fire hydrants (one within 150' of the buildings and two additional within 300'). Fire flow has been determined by the Fire Department to be 2,250 GPM. Water (SDC) fees of $510/unit will be required. "24t/0: 4.sii-f4,7r Zaf Signature of Director or Author d Representative Date Chntel 1 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL &DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Reviewing Department: Transportation Comments Due: AUGUST 20, 1998 Application No.: LUA-98-114,SA-A,ECF Date Circulated: August 11, 1998 _ Applicant: Keith&Annette Demps Project Manager: Jennifer Toth Henning Project Title: Chantelle Luxury Apartments Work Order No: 78412 Location: 2828 NE 3rd St. Site Area: 0.89 Acre Building Area(gross): 18,000 sq. ft. A. Environmental Impact(e.g.Non-Code) Comments No Comment. B. Policy-Related Comments No Comment. C. Code-Related Comments New driveway access to the site will be required to meet current City Codes and Standards. One new street light on NE 3rd street frontage will be required and must meet current City Codes and Standards. Transpiration mitigation fee of$8,250 will be required. See attached mitigation fee calculation forms. 8.17-98 Signature of Director or Authoriz Representative Date Chntel2 • n . + , ,::„.. . . ..��s::'..: . .......„.„:„..u.„......„,.....„....,..„....,..........„...,.....:. y„ ._... , ,40/4" %lb . r ft rilii•I T.1 ^ �, �`7°�>:gC^,•Vt•�9 b.—'t."•NJ%oN.Ge:.fo.'v.. .uww�7•",lcrK +' «r.pw..vr..s-�r�py .. .. , Project Name C i'laIA-1 e Ire /ci y toil Apt 5 Project Address Z`e Z t -- ) ' . e.e t Contact Person mliti F<c II Address '-I I 1 rj S W 106111 St ) Se4f( I l ILI 6 .. Phone Number (206) -- 21-I 2 - C 37 6, • Permit Number L OA - 61 S - I 14 Project Description 17 vs!, t c,pav ova c_c,u./th,f ( 3 blc,16s ) cz,� pcof k rcc} -fc;- 32 klz lnncleS , Land Use Type: • Method of Calculation: lip avtseit (22v0 0/Residential (�' ITE Trip Generation Manual eAcie 31 I 0 Retail 0 Traffic Study 7 t 0 Non-retail 0 Other �'4 ''i' • Calculation: Net tfteu> avevacje aa►It tv'os — (i7)((,.47) = LID dad,' to p5 4 t $ 7 ') (2 ) GtctIhi -trip .. C I(D ) ( $751 = 1 82 50.• o� . Transportation Miti ation Fee: S 2 SO. o6 Calculated by: ta wearr Date: g/12/q g Account Number: - 105. 5qq. 31W 70. DO. Date of Payment • City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL &DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Reviewing Department Surface/Wastewater Comments Due: AUGUST 20, 1998 Application No.: LUA-98-114,SA-A,ECF Date Circulated: August 11, 1998 Applicant: Keith&Annette Demps Project Manager: Jennifer Toth Henning Project Title: Chantelle Luxury Apartments Work Order No: 78412 Location: 2828 NE 3rd St. Site Area: 0.89 Acre Building Area(gross): 18,000 sq. ft. A. Environmental Impact(e.g.Non-Code) Comments No Comment. B. Policy-Related Comments No Comment. C. Code-Related Comments Surface Water(Storm Drainage) Storm drainage plan and temporary erosion/sedimentation plans must meet the requirements of the 1990 KCSWDM as adopted by the City of Renton. A Level I drainage analysis of the existing system 1/4 mile downstream with special attention to any identified problem areas will be required. A biofiltration system will be required if more than 5,000 sq. ft. of new impervious surface subject to vehicular use is being installed on site. Surface water (SDC) fees of $0.129/sq. ft. of new impervious surface constructed on the project site: Wastewater: Sanitary Sewer Sidesewer Connections to the proposed buildings will cost$80/each Wastewater(SDC)fees of$350/unit will be required. /Z a-- / 7--78 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Chntel City`,. ,.anton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:' 1vyctu6Y1 stY‘itG,GB COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 20, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-114,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: AUGUST 11, 1998 APPLICANT: Keith &Annette Demps PROJECT MANAGER: Jennifer Toth Henning PROJECT TITLE: Chantelle Luxury Apartments WORK ORDER NO: 78412 LOCATION: 2828 NE 3rd Street SITE AREA: 0.89 acre ) BUILDING AREA(gross): 18,000 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: David Fall, Fall Architectural, has made application on behalf of Keith and Annette Demps, for the development of a 17-unit multi-family apartment project on a 0.89 acre site. The project will consist of three six-plex buildings, 2- 1/2 stories in height, with parking for 32 vehicles. The proposal requires environmental review a6d administrative site plan approval. /Ty A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS •a; 04, .. Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable 7o Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment rirt Minor V"9 Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary s,fimacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing 11„„2 Air Aesthetics 3/0 Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to property assess this proposal. C Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev 10/93 • CITY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION LIST OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS within 300 feet of the subject site A4Z4C(AAY 4i-4.-S PROJECT NAME: .��"r/'c s /- Cr L./c•e- APPLICATION NO: LUA 'qa ' 114 , SIR-A %c ! The following is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. The Development Services Division will notify these individuals of the proposed development. NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER ( A-—'ra-c t+ea L, s 1—) ii1/41 $ .Vi CITY OF Kr— ...L. : w t‘k ,,,,.� -,.y • JUL. 1 A. tj:38 Via._ +4 ..�' -�sAW r j l 1� (Attach additional sheets, if necessary) (Continued) NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER Applicant Certification I, '/t)/Y€T1 D>�h'1 PS , hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property (Print Name) 44���������� owners and their addresses were obtained from: .:��W. Rai ���� CI City of Renton Technical Services Records S �' ", 0 Title Company Records ? �'is '• �; gr. King County Asses ors Records i I i .s - e. Si ned� +�.v�-�-1 "-✓ �.-,,ti(� Date (o/ ,9� �s '•��• �.�' g / 7� s4a.a• .: (Applicant) III �,,`,w"`•�. NOTARY ATTESTED: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washi.•ton, residing at — on the �j i H day of �'u�f 19 a . Signed (Notary Public) **** *** For City of Renton Use CERTIFICATION OF MAILING I. V'+C1al� . ' hereby certify that notices of the proposed application were mailed to (City l~mR..[oyee) each listed property owner on > 4 Signed .ltG ,i .• Date 11 NOTARY. ATTEST: Subscribed' and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in nd for the State'of Washington residing a on the '4 A day of (/ iLs Signed listprop.doc REV 07/95 MAR I L', ` COMMISSION EXPIRES 6/29/99 2 723650003509 723650003004 Ludlow Gordon 0 + Susan C. Randall Charles K. 2908 NE 4th Street 402 Idex PL NE Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 329180070008 329180069000 Gores Larry James Blondino Sandra L. 2801 NE 4th CT 2805 NE 4th CT Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98056 329180062005 329180068002 Bautista Alberto B+ Teresita Millett D. 2809 NE Fourth Court 403 NE Index PL Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 162305910307 162305913301 Atlantic Richfield Company King County P.O. Box 2485 500A K C Admin Bld Los Angeles CA 90051 Seattle, WA 98104 162305913004 162305906206 King County Admin Bldg T &E Investment Inc 500 Fourth Avenue 353 Vuemont PL NE Seattle, WA 98104 Renton, WA 98055 162305911404 162305911503 Atalantic Richfield Co. Atlantic Richfield Co. P.O. Box 2485 P.O. Box 2485 Los Angeles,CA 90051 Los Angeles,CA 90051 162305911701 Renton Housing Authority 970 Harrington NE Renton, WA 98056 • Proposed Mitigation Measures: ,l. Tee following Mitigation Measures will linty oe Unposed on the proposed project.These recommended Mitigation 'l 0 Measures address project impacts not covered by existing codes and regulations as cited above. ♦ A ,A I♦ 1.Traffic Mitigation Fee:equivalent to$76 par each new average weekday trip attributed to the proposal. r�SY /O 2.Fire Mitigation Fee:equivalent to$388 per each new multiaamity residential unit. 3.Parks Mitigation Fee:equivalent to$354.51 per each new multi-family residential unit. NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF 4.Geotechnlcal Study Recommendations:follow recommendations of geotechnical engineering report for the construction of site infrastructure and future building foundations. NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED 5.Stormwater:applicant may be required to exceed King County Stormwater Manual requirements. Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Ms.Jennifer Toth Henning,Project Manager, DATE: AUGUST 12,1998 Development Services Division,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on August 25,1998. II you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact Ms.Henning at(425)430.7288. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-98-114,SA-A,ECF record and will be notified of any decision on this project. APPUCATION NAME: CHANTELLE LUXURY APARTMENTS ' CONTACT PERSON: JENNIFER TOTH HENNING (425)430.7288 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: David Fall,of Fall Architectural,has made application on behalf of Keith and PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION Annette Demps,for the development of a 17-unit multi-family apartment project on a 0.89 acre site. The project will consist of three six-plea buiktings(17 dwelling units and one office unit),2-1/2 stones In height,with parking for 32 vehicles.The proposal requires environmental review and administrative site plan approval PROJECT LOCATION: 2828 NE 3rd Street OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED IONS-MI:As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore,as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS(M)process to give notice that a DNS-M Is likely to be issued.Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period.There will be no comment period following the Issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated(DNS-M).A 14 day appeal period will folios./the issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPUCATION DATE: July 14,1998 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: August 12,1998 •T.?"'p\;�i r- y- u" 1 �.,+ -y♦, • ) i Per mits/Review Requested: Environmental Review(SEPA),Site Plan Approval,Building Permits a'd i - � 4 •. Omer Permits which may be required: Not A Applicable • ' :!" `• l YPP �, �1.�;,e�'j� Fr... �� Requested Studies: Level 1 Downstream Analysts;Geotechnical Engineering Study j' ,�---.::,,,ter= Location where application may \''`�-l^'!l1'':•`.7, r•"C.,' 1 lL ) " C i- be reviewed: Planning/Building/Pubic Works Division,Development Services Department, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 /4a PUBLIC HEARING: Nopublic hearingIs required for this type "q of land use application. I• -lye - • aa•ReM CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: t \ . - I r�raRt1Y. i Zoning: Residential MultFans -Will(RM-Q—The RM-I Zone permits net densities of \ ?Kamm �.. - I�I 10 dwelling units per acre minimum,to 20 dwelling units per acre maximum. : "1>' i---Anwar" B - I I The maximum number of dwelling units permitted on the parcel would be 17. .-'T ' r r The application Is for 17 apartment units and either an office or recreational I room for residents.The proposed structures comply with setbacks established l through the RM-I Zone. - l�,j , . Environmental Documents that \', r , ,i T` �-1 Evaluate the Proposed Project: Geotechnical Engineering Report,Level I Drainage Analysis Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: The proposal is subject to the City's SEPA Ordinance,Zoning Code,Public Works Standard's,Uniform Building Code,Uniform Fire Code,etc.These adopted codes and standards will function to mitigate project impacts. • cENMnLorooc GENMALOTDOC , CERTIFICATION I, 54,nokt) YNA1 InV11A i , hereby certify that > copies of the above 3 conspicuous places on or nearby document were posted by me in the described property on cAS-i- 12, 1'015 • Signed: W ..,� U✓✓ I-h ATTEST: Subcribed and sworn before me, a Nortary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing iri ?1,0.71,41.1,1 , on the /,,eD'. day of % /55T T i77 GL -e /2-- 4-2-)1 V (1-tyr MARILYN KAMCHEFF COMMISSION EXPIRES 6/29/99 • " ppiAtk* Gtil Y �� NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE - MITIGATED DATE: AUGUST 12,1998 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-98-114,SA-A,ECF APPLICATION NAME: CHANTELLE LUXURY APARTMENTS PROJECT DESCRIPTION: David Fall, of Fall Architectural, has made application on behalf of Keith and Annette Demps, for the development of a 17-unit multi-family apartment project on a 0.89 acre site. The project will consist of three six-plex buildings (17 dwelling units and one office unit), 2-1/2 stories in height, with parking for 32 vehicles. The proposal requires environmental review and administrative site plan approval PROJECT LOCATION: 2828 NE 3rd Street OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED(DNS-M): As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore,as permitted under the RCW 43.21 C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS(M)process to give notice that a DNS-M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated(DNS-M). A 14 day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: July 14,1998 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: August 12, 1998 Permits/Review Requested: Environmental Review(SEPA),Site Plan Approval,Building Permits Other Permits which may be required: Not Applicable Requested Studies: Level 1 Downstream Analysis;Geotechnical Engineering Study Location where application may ,.s (P► be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, V 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 PUBLIC HEARING: No public hearing is required for this type of land use application. CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Zoning: Residential Multi-Family-Intill(RM-l)--The RM-I Zone permits net densities of 10 dwelling units per acre minimum,to 20 dwelling units per acre maximum. The maximum number of dwelling units permitted on the parcel would be 17. The application is for 17 apartment units and either an office or recreational room for residents. The proposed structures comply with setbacks established through the RM-I Zone. Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Geotechnical Engineering Report,Level I Drainage Analysis Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: The proposal is subject to the City's SEPA Ordinance,Zoning Code,Public Works Standard's,Uniform Building Code,Uniform Fire Code,etc. These adopted codes and standards will function to mitigate project impacts. GENMALOT.DOC Proposed Mitigation Measures: The following Mitigation Measures will likely be imposed on the proposed project. These recommended Mitigation Measures address project impacts not covered by existing codes and regulations as cited above. 1. Traffic Mitigation Fee: equivalent to$75 per each new average weekday trip attributed to the proposal. 2. Fire Mitigation Fee: equivalent to$388 per each new multi-family residential unit. 3. Parks Mitigation Fee: equivalent to$354.51 per each new multi-family residential unit. 4. Geotechnical Study Recommendations: follow recommendations of geotechnical engineering report for the construction of site infrastructure and future building foundations. 5. Stormwater: applicant may be required to exceed King County Stormwater Manual requirements. Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Ms. Jennifer Toth Henning, Project Manager, Development Services Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055, by 5:00 PM on August 25, 1998. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact Ms. Henning at (425) 430-7286. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: JENNIFER TOTH HENNING (425)430-7286 PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION I "�f ':. . Z Jr NC NTN Ci�'.,, i'1,'S'. �'r• •I I 1I Milli - 1 , '.X.)o C ` 1 �� :.. .yam ri :rN E - -.TN 1 'SI_^--l+tr___ _ '�..�..i•� fY. gyp. 4 tw`- J:.� ,L. EktSTINb ' r - -- '. i. y�D•� EXii.rIN6 tI \ •i��>' PRoRneO j• . . g �y. APFa�MEVrS a W .... I \ . GENMALOT.DOC 4� ` , CIT OF RENTON ;iii`- , Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator August 12, 1998 Mr. David Fall Fall Architectural 4115 Southwest 106th Street Seattle, WA 98146 SUBJECT: Chantelle Luxury Apartments Project No. LUA-98-114,SA-A,ECF Dear Mr. Fall: The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on August 25, 1998. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. Please contact me, at (425) 430-7286, if you have any questions. Sincerely, c - Pv)7 nifer Toth Henning Project Manager cc: Mr. & Mrs. Keith Demps/Owners ACCPTLTR.DOC 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer • ITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION MASTER APPLICATION PROPERTY OWNER(Sj PROJECT INFORMATION Note: If there is more than one legal owner, pease aftaah an.add�tional notarized Master Application for each owner PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: NAME: KEITH AND ANNETTE DEMPS CHANTELLE LUXURY APT HOMES PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION: ADDRESS: 28xx NE 3RD STREET 2308 NE 24TH RENTON, WA 98056 CITY: ZIP: KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): RENTON 98056 H 162305-9120-06 TELEPHONE NUMBER: EXISTING LAND USE(S): 425-226-1444 VACANT LAND APPLICANT (if other than owner) PROPOSED LAND USES: NAME: DAVID FALL APARTMENT COMPLEX COMPANY (if applicable): EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: FALL ARCHITECTURAL N/A RM -t ADDRESS: PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAb AP DESIGNATION (if applicable): 4115 SOUTHWEST 106TH ST. D� N/A C/TY of NT 1 % CITY: SEATTLE ZIP: 98146 UI EXISTING ZONING: // RENT0N 'NG RM-I t1 L 14 1998 TELEPHONE NUMBER: PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): (206) 242-6376 CONTACTP.ERSON N/A SITE AREA (SQ. FT. OR ACREAGE): NAME: DAVID FALL .89 ACRE OR 38,804 sq ft COMPANY (if applicable): PROJECT VALUE: FALL ARCHITECTURAL $1 ,355,517. ADDRESS: IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? 4115 SOUTHWEST 106TH ST. YES CITY: ZIP: SEATTLE 98146 IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA? TELEPHONE NUMBER: 206-431-7960 NO 206-242-6376 • LEGAL DESCRY __�N OF PROPERTY (Attach epar sheet �f npee sary') . Lot(s) 4 of City of Renton Short Plat No. 384-79, recorded under Recording No. 7910189001, records of King County, Washington. SITUATE in the County of King, State of Washington. • TYPE OF: APPLICATION & F ES Check all application ypesthat apply -City:staff will determine.f ees _ANNEXATION $ SUBDIVISION: COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT $ _ REZONE $ _LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ SPECIAL PERMIT $ _ SHORT PLAT $ _TEMPORARY PERMIT $ _TENTATIVE PLAT $ • CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ _ PRELIMINARY PLAT $_ SITE PLAN APPROVAL $( .Gt, _ FINAL PLAT $ _ GRADE & FILL PERMIT $ (NO. CU. YDS: ) PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ _ VARIANCE $ (FROM SECTION: ) _ PRELIMINARY _WAIVER $ _ FINAL _WETLAND PERMIT $ _ ROUTINE VEGETATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ BINDING SITE PLAN $ SHORELINE REVIEWS: _ SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ _ CONDITIONAL USE $ _ VARIANCE $ _ EXEMPTION $No Charge _ ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ 6/20. REVISION $ AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP KEITH AND ANNETTE DEMPS �01,6 I, (Print Name) , declare that I am (please check one)x the owner of the property involved in this epplicatio,rii$A�''Wie$ authorized representative to act for the property owner (please attach proof of authorization), and that the foregoing statements'aed,wetp'her contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief:; L: " r � `it V• W L12 ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me;ar . r: Ptr ml(n..ant7 KEITH DEMPS AND ANNETTE DEMPS • for the State f .'//�/ residing at, on the :.• �0 (Name of Owner/Representative) �i; e/ 'day of xA Nr /�/� Y� ✓lam 1 �- JL_rY (Signature of Owner/Representative) (Signature of Notary Public) (This section o be completed by City Staff ) City fills Number p '"� AAb BSP CAPS CAP U C> A CU A CU H EC LLA MHP SPUD 'FP PP . .. PI SA-A, SA H SHPL A SHP,L N . SP SM . S(VL TP.,,V A V H W TOTAL FEES S1f, } TOTAL POSTAGE PROVIDED: $ ,, r MASTERAP.DOC REVISED 8/97 City of Renton July 8, 1998 Planning / Building I Public Works Municpal Building 200 Mill Ave S. 3rd floor Renton, WA 98055 Re: PROJECT NARRATIVE; Site Plan Review / Chantelle Apartments (see Pre-ap Meeting Summary 98-29, dated 4/1/98) To whom it may concern, The proposed project; The Chantelle Apartments, is an 17 unit apartment project with a Manager's unit on a site of .89 acres (38,804s.f.), located at 284e NE 3rd Street in Renton. The site is currently unimproved and vacant. The site is featureless and is flat except for some moderate slope down toward 3rd Ave. There are two structures off- site to the North with South facing views that may be partially obstructed; and there are two structures off-site to the West with limited Southeast views that also may be partilally obstructed as a result of the proposed project. The proposed apartment project will consist of three 6-plex buildings ,2-1/2 stories in height, with a total of 32 parking stalls provided. Two of the parking stalls will be in partitioned garage spaces and eight of the parking stalls will be sheltered by a carport. The property will be enclosed by a six foot high wood fence and there will be a screened dumpster area for refuse pick-up. Other accessory structures will include a mail kiosk toward the center of the site and an entry sign at the access driveway through the east half of the site served by an existing curb-cut on NE 3rd Street. I hope that I have describe the proposed project in adequate detail for your review purposes. t nkxo ENT P►P I'I'4 `NG DEVECOPM l OF RENTON David J. F I �UL 1998 RECEIVED Construction Mitigation Construction Dates: Start 01-Sep 98 End 30-Apr-98 Mon 6:OOa 6:OOp Tues. i6:OOa 6:OOp co,\, Hours of Operation: Wed. )6:OOa 6:OOp c.r, Thur. !6:00a 6:OOp "P Fri. '6:OOa 6:OOp 0 �;, °L ate �� S l� Haulin /Trans rtation Routes: All Hauling and transportation will take place utilizing main streets only. The primary route will be to utilize 3rd street,from Rainier Ave. Traffic/Dust Minimization: Traffic and dust will be kept to a minimum by installation of a temporary fence and limiting all construction to the site within the fence and keeping all dirt work wet minimizing dust. Specialty Hours: Sat. 6:OOa 6:OOp Sun. - - Traffic Control Plan: -Official Traffic Study Not Required- If there should be an impact, there will be traffic controllers on site EXHIBIT"A" EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS AND UTILITIES AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS AND UTILITIES OVER THAT PORTION OF LOT 4 OF CITY OF RENT ON SHORT PLAT NO. 384-79, AS RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 7910189001, SAID SHORT PLAT BEING A PORTION OF THE NW '/+ OF THE NW Y• OF SECTION 16, T 23 N.,R. 5 E., W M., SAID EASEMENT IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT THAT IS N 73°35'57'E 91 76' FROM THE SW CORNER THEREOF;THENCE N 1°08'26"E, 72.08', THENCE N 88°51'34"W, 74',THENCE N 1°08'26'E SO'; THENCE S 88°51'34"E 74'; THENCE N 1°08'26"E 14'; TIIENCE S 88°51'34"E 67'; THENCE S 1°08'26"W 12';THENCE N 88°51'34"W 22'; THENCE S 1°08'26"W 137.93', THENCE S 63°09'28'W 10 14';THENCE S 73°35'57"W 37.80' TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPT ANY PORTION THEREOF LYING WITHIN TRACT"A" AS SHOWN ON SAID SHORT PLAT. r 13 �CpY Jk1 - 1° 1,,,8 ReCeINI )v r , 7 f,.. LL A rd.ct 125 •22G• 1 F Rom CZ.„,,a. GALL. Re! CNAI.JTaLL1i 4PTs, i 1 I N82'12�42"W — . �. or . IM MO MI MP ter. � MP �� Oa MI �.�.� ..�� 165.75' I 1 I I II I I 1 I w N88'51'34'W ''' I I S8 67.00' g I I il NBB'S1'34`W z " Nr8831'34'W z N 74.00' I 22.00' I L.,1 I.1;, 1 (.4 M 0 O N z W I I N O I o D a � TO z i W 1 I N h 1 I as . r�1 ' O z N88•51'34'W 74.00' 1 I I 1 i I I IW 1 1 O _ 1 I Pig / zI 0.0 0 N63 h5 93 I I / 1 I N�i650'� N6�°`b r-�/� J7 e gym " 1 Ig'I e %. 1 •'� • j/o 2 e rf PDtNYDa P�a0t►JNlNtio Rl3nucltp cm 1 i I ( \ ILLL1 LA r////i/i2 � rJ— I T M g7?47 UC e'� . 0 0. _x• — r— _tes'Ii,'i= • 4^'--t`.M4—_7.1 _= — - -- \\ I I 1 a I \ I I �� I I \ I 1 I 1 I 1 I I 1. I {\� 1 - IHi ' Ii 11 ` /j 1 1i1 /1 I l := n I 1 1 ► ,_- `ARE L Z e 1.3� /� a III ,✓ r . N 1 L_� N885ji4 �T .. i /LT li 7 t.a1 Bp WATER \ �� � \/ I3/4 TYP_ I \ 11 l i Cytt OF RENTON I \ w / J \ WATER I ETER TYP. I \ "NC ' • I% I \ t C.O. 1 ' $ e* 311011 D I.P. DOMESTIC WATER Ii 1 a3j `+„� \..\ 'to' I Of TUTU CHECK IAE4E r;; 4'/;D.I.P.11 cp Q .u'•?:� \ • 4 1 N 1 \ A r- & METER -'~' --——— `'\ f 811( REDUCER l; \ d I "Y• — 6 D.I.P. Wli•• 1 1 \ --�— MEM \\ MEP1 1 ?I' �1 D E, 1 -.. L . M6851 3 2 'Z I • T-OFT \ 74.00' II, " I I 'r—\ - II7T' ,�L� \ Iq O /, A 1 ao 1 ` \1 k/ ci \ I \ 1- ` 1\L.• •I I IFH /269 1 IF-011.. -, •,, ,,41 I06 N..\bi T DOUBLE C¢1ECK v • \�. �9 9' ucrco cro I:lvncr 'f► �p", I- % i ` v \ �';4 • /4�G\1.01 NS O / o II x \\ .�'Ni \Zg 56 G t ,\/ I:01 \ / // S 110 �•1111111111111... + // ,`cam / / / do CITY OFrRENTON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or"does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. SIT F,1-1 Gay OF 3U1,- 14 1'''8 REGE V .D Environmental Checklist A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: 4P. Putcr'-xt5 2. Name of applicant: 4V lb J , e,a4(rcc rui_AL 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: '-((; Sw • i 006 •a4-Z Co 3 7 4. Date checklist prepared: -T / �/ c 5. Agency requesting checklist: G(Tr--/ O it ce i~L•-°( 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): 60.1.6,Mc;1(174 ,1,4cd / (Tff 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. jo 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. 101.rE]y ,t'c,'(A't.4.1-1.�4.t'-7/4% 55c - ,t i7 Sv2vf i?,-a IAjcj<Z_ .4VC, J- ' u (T 5I5— T7Z( w19 c.c.) <c 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. /vc' 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. c'(LD/<)G - C i�y cF � iY?rJ 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. 7 g; Uv,T ,y ��. 7711 -.uT 1'iZ0)c T 4 C IZ J 2 Environmental Checklist 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit arty plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Q 'e y� ' Z� x x ti 4071c4110 c(/C( ',r5 - B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other FLAT- . b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) 2 07 0 c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. G ,7`.9 t-; S 9 v 9o(L < duff 7-67 d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. /t,c e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. )(6.4 UA7av (cov -i fd:v' ( 6/reixru e4 L Fitz /44c"rc i & f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. NoFJZoco LJg L� �/i 7bm164U / '2 (eve;IE/C?7,A1J "4-77 v([1 "4-4"1/4 7 • g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 5-6 � d 3 Environmental Checklist h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: — /tom / 441.T7c/ •476 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: • 3. WATER a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. /iia, 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. /0 � 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. ,L1r� , 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known./1i 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year flood plain? If so, note location on the site plan/Li/4 4 Environmental Checklist 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. it,'ig b. Ground Water: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. 4)4 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; .industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. 7/f4_ c. Water Runoff(including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters, If so, describe. gu,ccct<f ' 2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. ,L;c) d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other X shrubs )( grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? 6,299e, i ec' 47/ ,'_e tl . 5 Environmental Checklist c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. A/J/1 d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: e0.2ev;.49 Ce9 Ve ' /.31--c2ti c v(�E` . T✓�r ) (�/? 6.4L,ev2 �j1gP.Q1 Es GLL�r�C LJ 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: (see next page) ;t /- Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site./1,//fi c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain A,A d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. 6772ic /-/ re b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. ,A-'O c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: 0)(--1 !-f//L'6 7p A- 7-;f 7 E <<it-�'C�L��f LGJ'�'c' L c ¢1 L(`j C.c 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 6 Environmental Checklist a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. L" 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: 1 f1 G,4'U67D,,l cry? /00 414 b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? t%T 7 ?4 cf( .4,1/9 - c7- 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic,. construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. (0v,77-uc C, -' - Cc.4•� 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Glut( / /-'C cf S7r2C-"f r`S 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE /L%< a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? S,te I5 VdC€rif/ aydyfyna4 nor-rig I-, G vn vy►tir-t�u, to ea St. 1a b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. e'774.77,1 Nvv c. Describe any structures on the site. "ifri• d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? 44ridathitt 71 tail -0. / ty /'1d // Kni — f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? /2-64 14ft fiW1 fray /Ce /l//� 7 Environmental Checklist g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A- h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. N° i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? j //19 k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: • /U/i4 I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. +� Mr 0i2L`C- iNC�-'vl{ l-Fov�i<'t-'lo (J v b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. AA,,,L' c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: A.' 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. (/i ti4_ 4+4/ ge(0 I r 3"7' cc; i 6,(72. 4,)F b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? ,4,).pit ev;---a E_L, N'e llaLl .0'((JCS ./1 P41-n ect.tr- aut 4) u c-Trz4 c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: J /6'J rite 5 ciL'C1,./ �4L'�UL¢ �!✓ Ark..O /CCf= ("4l2/f 8 Environmental Checklist 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? ,44/Avc4W4 6 '362 S7-4AJ�5 Coc.g7� b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? i,.)o c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? 4A.5g :e,c) C,.9,11.44ee°c"ii1 L llinJ✓E.�YF.c CE S' �?� �QG 770 7 ' i 4764i d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: ogfej,r-, r1,y,C) efl( 12. ` RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? ,t de,>16,.t)R7 •�,C 7w7 ./r1 R-9Y ti cG, - `T CGf< <c%toe'C- b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. ,t-'c: c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. ;c,J o b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. (_; c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: ti'-,4 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. 77-7/c 'e i.-//7-$ 9 Environmental Checklist b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? V� c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? -3 2 /12c9L)e -� d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private? ,,,Le e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity- of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. ice) f. How many vehicular trips per day would be gen ted by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. e 4Ffe e;Tu...) g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: ,v .-t_ 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. ,t1i/ur,t,141.; b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. ive C Z 7e,N./ (-1;0 4Cc rt'G7G7 lc-c9,c) c 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. 10 Environmental Checklist b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. 6 12417r,.) ti,Ub /lo u1: c" .ti p A-64A (yeti r rdiA-; `rG tA7`i (,LjT, pt.) Gt.C,`4 L fi(j4 , Q ern(ee 7-7 . CUA r an.r `rG e t i.0 / C. SIGNATURE " u��i � ,/t/a/A� rev,,�> , c,T. � f, . I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non- significance that it mi ht issue in reliance pon this checkl' t should there be any willful misrepresentation or w Iful lack of f II disci ure on my part. Proponent: Name Printed: 74 L. Date: -7 - ( ./ ' 11 Environmental Checklist D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEETS FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (These sheets should only be used for actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs. You do not need to fill out these sheets for project actions.) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water;.emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, flood plains, or prime farmlands? Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: 12 Environmental Checklist 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: • 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non- significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: Name Printed: Date: REVISED 9/94 13 • � n �7 �I 7i.IM k , `�•3»T t I,_ .4! au ia611 �. r ttr.�. :' !4: I f xY -4 s ti•99 / ir T arip NE k, , • 4 1H Y ' ail:1 ) ` L! r t r L • ! Y � , j�0 t �1 ,` 2i � r,6Y 1 aa�'d 4: j� �J ,l a 111 1! M ' '1' �:• (! air ®' I` �+jj' i}s: jji �E:!I'� '._` • .'3.'s:fr Lri'lly:.:1...1'1'....:4:11101.1.1.,' IOj k5E! . i � 't:�r ; ki Ai Y. } {j ' �} °:'f a ftt :1 ;' yY: �>F�Ft .. s , : vwafaul.: 4j� t. ir ;'� I'� `i,r' �� .ti`I `, , ' •Ftaf!• f 11� , 1ii<• it •3.l'-. AV �••1 �� to , t , & .. r, IN*EX PL.YIOEX AV r.M I m �y t3. 1Z •• Z r �1 7'' 1 (m . 'PKIAHD AV H. al I :! t,�::; ,• , es ; : Ill ,?� • • :3*4",!..• ft•it.," r';',,..i's V 0 j. NRQE� AV NE M0 i j •8 ► ay} . •y Or.Oa u m +a . i• - ran , . r - 1 .e �G • f r..; 5 .•} se b c.: ; ` •N f4 tit :..t a f , _- S 4 t ';At ,, lA y`i a ,l �y* ''1j`lat Y tii r `J F m 1�0. `Fii i ! .. 1. A H I. �i, • 2$ `tA s:, QUEER,AV s' NE 1 E * * • � �, ► Old Rep. iC 'Title, Ltd. PLAT CERTIFICATE • Order No.: 310584 Unit: 3 Date: May 14, 1998 at 8:00 a.m. Fee : $ 250.00 Sales Tax: $ 21.50 Total: $ 271.50 FOR INFORMATION AND ASSISTANCE ON THIS ORDER CONTACT: SEATTLE OFFICE Lisa Gosciejew, Senior Title Officer, Unit Manager Kim Kazmirski, Title Assistant Cindy Hoogerhyde, Title Assistant Telephone: (206) 689-5643 Fax: (206) 682-0152 1201 Third Avenue, Suite#1410, Seattle Washington 98101 Your Title Officer can assist you with properties in both King and Snohomish Counties Reference: ANNETTE DEMPS .2308 NE 24TH ST RENTON WA 98056 Ladies/Gentlemen: In the matter of the plat submitted for your approval, the Company (Old Republic National Title Insurance Company) has examined the records of the County Auditor and County Clerk of King County, Washington, and the records of the Clerk of the United States Courts holding terms in said County and from such examination hereby certifies that the title to the following described land, Situate in said King County, to-wit: // o - ! Or: ►IT Pi I . CITY OF F.Zi Vested in: JUL 1 tt 'LJ8 KEITH DEMPS, SR. and ANNETTE B. DEMPS, husband and wife RECE� ED Legal Description: SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "A" FOR LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS, SEE ATTACHED: 310584 Page 1 EXHIBIT "A" Lot(s)4 of City of Renton Short Plat No. 384-79, recorded under Recording No. 7910189001, records of King County, Washington. SITUATE in the County of King, State of Washington. END OF EXHIBIT "A" 310584 Page 2 SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS: 1. RIGHTS OF PARTIES IN POSSESSION and claims that.may be asserted under unrecorded instruments, if any. 2. NOTICE OF ADDITIONAL TAP OR CONNECTION CHARGES: For: Water, Sewer and/or Storm and Surface Water Utilities Amounts and charges for which have been, or will be Levied against said property. Recorded under Recording No. 9606210966. Specific amount not disclosed. 3. GENERAL TAXES, PLUS INTEREST AND PENALTY AFTER DELINQUENCY; 1ST HALF DELINQUENT ON MAY 1; 2ND HALF DELINQUENT ON NOVEMBER 1: For year: 1998 Amount Billed: $ 2,524.28 Amount Paid: $ 1,262.14 Parcel No.: 162305-9120-06 Levy Code: 2100 Assessed Valuation: Land: $ 191,600.00 Improvements: $ 0.00 NOTE: Taxes may not always be divisible into two equal half payments. The higher amount($.01 more) is always due on the first half payment by April 30th. The odd cent(s) must be rounded upward. Second half is usually $.01 less. CONSERVATION DISTRICT CHARGES, as follows; together with interest and penalties after delinquency: Year: 1998 Levy Code: 9430 Amount Billed: $ 5.00 Amount Paid: $ 2.50 4. DEED OF TRUST to secure an indebtedness of the amount stated below and any other amounts payable under the terms thereof: Grantor: Keith Demps, Sr. and Annette B. Demps, husband and wife Trustee: Chicago Title Insurance Company Beneficiary: Emma Cugini, a single woman as her separate estate Loan No.: Undisclosed Amount: $135,000.00 Dated: February 25, 1998 Recorded: March 4, 1998 Recording No.: 9803040610 310584 Page 3 5. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: Grantee: City of Renton, a municipal corporation, its successors and assigns Purpose: Wildlife habitat, flood control, public access, landscaping and public utilities (including water and sewer)with necessary appurtenances Area Affected: Southeasterly portion of said Premises Recorded: April 13, 1988 Recording No.: 8804130367 Refer to the record for full particulars. 6. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: Purpose: Sanitary sewer Disclosed by: Plat of said Addition Area Affected: Northerly portion of said Premises 7. RESERVATIONS AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: Contained in Deed from: State of Washington Recording No.: 2060096 Reserving to the grantor all oil, gases, coal, ores, minerals, fossils, etc., and the right of entry for opening, developing and working the same, and providing that such rights shall not be exercised until provision has been made for full payment of all damages sustained by reason of such entry. No examination has been made as to the present ownership or encumbrances of the reserved mineral estate. Right of the State of Washington or its successors, subject to payment of compensation therefore, to acquire rights of way for private railroads, skid roads, flumes, canals, water courses or other easements for transporting and moving timber, stone, minerals and other products from this and other property, as reserved in Deed referred to above. 8. COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS, EASEMENTS, DEDICATIONS, NOTES AND RECITALS, if any, contained on Short Plat recorded under Recording No. 7910189001. NOTE 1: The liability of the Company under this Plat Certificate shall be limited to the amount of actual loss sustained by the addressee because of reliance upon the information set forth herein, but in no event shall such liability exceed the fee paid for this Plat Certificate. JCl/gmc 310584 Page 4 - 4 * OLD REPUBLIC TITLE, LTD. * �c * ATTACHED ARE COURTESY COPIES OF DOCUMENTS FROM PRELIMINARY COMMITMENT 3/0SY 171 COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS IF ANY, BASED UPON RACE, COLOR, RELIGION, SEX, HANDICAP, FAMILIAL STATUS OR NATIONAL ORIGIN ARE DELETED UNLESS AND ONLY TO THE EXTENT THAT SAID COVENANT (a) IS EXEMPT UNDER CHAPTER 42, SECTION 3607 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE OR (b) RELATES TO HANDICAP BUT DOES NOT DISCRIMINATE AGAINST HANDICAPPED PERSONS. 1201 THIRD AVE.#1410 SEATTLE,WA 98101 (206)625-1952 FAX (206)689-8547 2910 COLBY AVE.#100, EVERETT,WA 98201 (425)258-5050"(800)370-4022 FAX(425)258-4825 • AFTER RECORDING MAIL TO: • MR. AND MRS. KEITH DEMPS, SF' • 2800 BLOCK OF NE 3RD ST. Renton, WA 98056 ti ti STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED - . - - Escrow No. 1325-98 \' ____ Lcji .1.4 Title Order No. 496364 THE GRANTOR EMMA CUGINI,A Single Woman As Her Seperate Estate for and in consideration of Ten Dollars and other good and valuable consideration in hand paid, conveys and warrants to KEITH DEMPS,SR.and ANNETTE B.DEMPS,Hus5:.nd and Wife the following described real estate, situated in the County of King, State of Washington: Lot 4, CITY OF RENTON SHORT PLAT NUMBER 384-79, recorded under recording number C 791018'3001, in King County,Washington. w Assessor's Property Tax Parcel/Account Number(s): 162305-9120-06 Subject to easements, restrictions, reservations. covenants and conditions of record as shown on attached Exhibit "A" and by this reference made a part hereof. Dated: February 25. 1998 ,riv C." (Lk r` {era, 1 EMMA CUGINI J State of Washington }SS. County of Kinq I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that EMMA CUGINI is/are the person(s) who S appeared before me, and said person(s) acknowledged that SHE signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be HER free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in this instrument. Dated: i . 1 < /) (� Notary Public in and for tie State of Washington ;Y Residing at NA tYL } My appointment expires /Gil/O i rog LPB 10 EiS96929 03/04/98 2537.00 165000.00 . f I. EASEMENT AS DELINEATED AND/OR DEDICATED ON THE FACE OF THE SHORT PLAT. '� PURPOSE: SANITARY SEWER AREA AFFECTED: NORTHERLY PORTION OF SAID PREMISES 1 i 5 2. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: li GRANTEE: CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE AND ST. PAUL RWY CO PURPOSE: ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION SYSTEM AREA AFFECTED: THE DESCRIPTION CONTAINED THEREIN IS NOT SUFFICIENT TO DETERMINE { .72 EXACT ?^ ... . PROPERTY 1:2 . RECORDED: OCTOBER 8. l.•I ' RECORDING NUMBER: 1251411 f . t I C SAID EASEMENT HAS BEEN MODIFIED BY INSTRUMENT. RECORDED UNDER. RECORDING NUMBER 7309190290. 3. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: 1 GRANTEE: CITY OF RENTOIJ, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION. ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS I I PURPOSE: WILDLIFE HABITAT, FLOOD CONTROL, i PUBLIC ACCESS. LAND SOAPING, AND i PUBLIC UTILITIES (INCLUDING WATER AND SEWER) WITH NECESSARY C APPURTENANCES i C AREA AFFECTED: SOUTHEASTERLY PORTION OF SAID A m PREMISES RECORDED: APRIL 13, 1988 — RECORDING NUMBER: 8904130367 I y,,1 • _4 4 EXCEPTIONS AND RESERVATIONS CONTAINED INDEED FROM THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, WHEREBY THE GRANTOR EXCEPTS AND RESERVES ALL OIL. GASES, COAL. ORES, MINERALS, FOSSILS, ETC., AND THE RIGHT OF ENTRY FOP OPENING. DEVELOPING AND WORKING THE SAME AND PROVIDING THAT j SUCH RIGHTS SHALL NOT BE EXERCISED UNTIL PROVISION HAS BEEN MADE i FOP FULL PAYMENT OF ALL DAMAGES SUSTAINED BY REASON OF SUCH ENTRY: I RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 2060096. FIGHT OF STATE OF WASHINGTON OR ITS SUCCESSORS, SUBJECT TO PAYMENT OF COMPENSATION THEREFORE, TO ACQUIRE RIGHTS OF WAY FOR PRIVATE RAILROADS, SKID ROADS, FLUMES, CANALS, WATER COURSES OR OTHER. EASEMENTS FOR TRANSPORTING AND MO'JING TIMBER, STONE, MINERALS AND V',THER PRODUCTS FROM THIS AND OTHER PROPERTY. AS RESERVED IN DEED PEFEPRED TO ABOVE. '.-'.....) !ITS, CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS AND EASEMENTS CONTAINED 1N i N,TPIA.IF.NT: i PE:.' I. '(OPDED: 25, 1971 I RECORDING NUMBER: 7105250544 I - '%EIIAi:'rs. CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS. DEDICATIONS. AGREEMENTS AI:D tY_TES. AS CONTAINED iN CITY OF PE:NTON SHORT PLAT NUMBER 3H4-'I" jj��!!����r°°r:'r:',''..''��� ,- '."1?L'ED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 79101139001 . 1 -- =.PHB AND CONDITIONS OF NOTICE OF CI;AP(;E:: BY WATER. SEWER, ,.::[..,:F wri ;TM AND SURFACE WATER. UTILITIES, RECORDED UNDER RECORDING (!"HOER .',0621096E r • .. r 1 AFTER RECORDING MAIL TO: EMMA CUGINI 353 VUEMONT PL. RENTON, WA 98056 • i A DEED OF TRUST ,. (For use in the State of Washingtcn o :'i) Escrow No. 1325 98 Title Order No. 49636 •4 \\": .,. -, --r THIS DEED OF TRUST,made this February 25, 1998 ,between KEITH DEMPS. SR. and ANNETTE B. DEMPS.Husband and Wife .GRANTOR. : whose address is 2800 BLOCK OF NE 3RD ST.. Renton, WA 98056. CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPAMY .TRUSTEE. whose address is 1800 COLUMBIA CENTER, 701 FIFTH AVE. Seattle, WA 98104. and x C EMMA CUGINI, A Single Woman As Her Seperate Estate .BENEFICIARY. .•fl whose address is 353 VUEMONT PL., RENTON, WA 98056 C WITNESSETH: Grantor hereby bargains,sells,and conveys to Trustee in trust.with power of sale,the following described real i ., property in King County.Washington: i (-) i Lot 4, CITY OF RENTON SHORT PLAT NUMBER 384-79, recorded under recording number l 7910189001. in King County, Washington. 'r - • , Assessor's Property Tax Parcel/Account Number's): 162305-9120-06 CIE i which real property is not used principally for agricultural or farming purposes.together with all the tenements.hrreditaments j and;.ppurte:nances now or herealter!hereunto belonging or in any wise appertaining.and the rents.issues and profits thereof ` o This:lend is fro the purpose of securing performance of each agreement of Grantor herein contained.and payment of the.: ,. of ONE HUNDRED THIRTY-FIVE THOUSAND AND 00r100 DOLLARS IS135,000,001 with interest. in 4 a::cnrdance with the terms of a promissory note of even date herewith,payable to Beneficiary or wife:,and made by Grantor. .1., and ah r.•newals Idtcations,and extensions thereof,anJ also such further sums as may be advanced or loaned by Beneficiary .P iar i.e.-odor or;,Iry of their successor,or assigns,together with interest thereon at such rate as shall be agreed upon. 4 To protect the security of this Deed of Trust.Grantor covenants and agrees: T. l,.nyi th.•prig,erfv in good condition and repair; to permit no waste thereof' to complete any building, structure. or -- ,r:,tirc:.,r.i.rr.t hero:;tiurt or shoal In Ire built thereon,I,.restore promptly any building.structure.or improvement thereon which dery be leirielp"t^r rteattOyed and to comply with all laws, ordinances. regulations.covenants.-conditions, and restrictions ,.f!e.:tlr ii me property r' y - I •i••n l..•':ri•dehreluent oil inproperty wtul taxes and assessments upon the property:to keep the free and clear of all other 1 .tiery,•s liens r r encumbrances ere p,n.iri j the security of this Deed of Trust. s 2 T.,Ie.'',all tit;ililirt4S up.v or hereafter erected on the property des:ribed herein continuously insured against loss by lee of ,.thee fiatanls ei.,u,n.uunt rot less than thu total debt secured by this Deed of Trust.All policies shall beheld by the Beneficiary Xg r✓ and be in such i:•itiipmues as the Beneficiary may approve and have loss y,as its interest nta'y payable tint to the Beneficiary, a- appear.find than to the Grantor.The amount collected under arty insurance policy may be applied upon any indr.btednoss hereby 3t1 ...exitedin surd,order as the Beneficiary shall determine.Such application by the Beneficiary shall not cause discontinuance of tS .iris praceell.ngs le.ham:lase this Deed of Trust.In the event of foreclosure,all rights of the Granter in insurance policies then i a,t..r.a shall pass to the purchaser at the lorrrclosure salesr c 4 T•,r0•1.•ret..n• I...„r prurytedinq Isurporteig to affect the seci,r:ty her-of or the rights or powers of Beneficiary or Trl:st.e .x oriel 1.,Pa.all urest• ..nil•vpm1,11% mr:lurhplj Cost of title search and aaerney s te es in a fora:pnatle arnOUnt,in an,r Sur:1.e: 5 ';i e.iaiq .r.n.1...r, suit lirouljh hwa t try Bene .: ry to foreclose this Deed of Trust t .l' }i .. •.• ,. .'I. f, !••••• flit ,,l DOT%all.,i.fir.ectiiin with this Cecil ul Trust,incluOetg the inspenst/5 it the Trusl•te.nrurrite . in,1:'n' 't"in i�•r�•.•i;;rl-d her Belly and Tfl/titre!and•111 ornery s Ieny aC ill•sty incurred.aY prle\'Ided by statute ci •. r.houlrt:if did . Ind Ii.Iiay :.1••n du-.thy lasts. a5S.lsyp,.rits ins.:faaCe prrtmrurn:,bens encurirlita.o.eS or Other charges •r'}..nst the property hereinabove described.Beneficiary may pay the same,and the amount so paid.with interest at the rate set fr-.+[rt in the note secured hereby. shall be added to and become a pan of the debt secured in this Deed of Trust. IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED THAT: 1 In the event any portion of the property is taken or damaged in an eminent domain proceeding,the entire amount of the award or such portion as may be necessary to fully satisfy the obligation secured hereby, shall be paid to Beneficiary to be applied to said obligation. By accepting payment of any sum secured hereby after its due date. Beneficiary does not waive its right to require prompt payment when due of al!other sums so secured or to declare default for failure to so pay. 3 The Trustee shall reconvey all or any part of the property covered by this Deed of Trust to the person entitled thereto. on written request of the Grantor and the Beneficiary, or upon satisfaction of the obligation secured and written request for reconveyance made by the Beneficiary or the person entitled thereto. 4.Upon default by Grantor In the payment of any indebtedness secured hereby or in the pert orm:.nce^!_?".' •:r n herein, all sums secured hereby shall immediately bocci-.• .'•.io and payaU_at tho Gpaui o: •.:,,r Serieliciary. In such event anc upon written request of acm i iary,Trustee shall sell;i.. •:ust property, in accordance with the Deed of Trust Act of the State of Washington, at public auction to the highest bidder.Any person except Trustee may bid at Trustee's sale.Trustee shall apply the proceeds of the sale as follows: (1) to the expense of the sale,including a reasonable Trustee's fee and attorney's fee: (2) to the obligation secured by this Deed of Trust;and(3)the surplus, it any, shall be distributed to the persons entitled thereto. 5.Trustee shall deliver to the purchaser at the sale its deed,without warranty, which shall convey to the purchaser the interest in the property which Grantor had or had the power to convey at the time of his execution of this Deed of Trust, and such as he may have acquired thereafter.Trustee's deed shall recite the facts showing that the sale was conducted in compliance with all the requirements of law and of this Deed of Trust, which recital shall be prima facie evidence of such compliance and conclusive evidence thereof in favor of bona fide purchaser and encumbrance's for value. 6.The power of sale conferred by this Deed of Trust and by the Deed of Trust Act of the State of Washington is not an exclusive remedy; Beneficiary may cause this Deed of Trust to be foreclosed as a mortgage. 7 In the event of the death, incapacity, disability, or resignation of Trustee, Beneficiary may appoint in writing a successor trustee, and upon the recording of such appointment in the mortgage records of the county in which this Deed of Trust is recorded,the successor trustee shall be vested with all powers of the original trustee.The trustee is not obligated to notify any party hereto of pending sale under any other Deed of Trust or of an action or proceeding in which Grantor,Trustee,or Beneficiary shall be a party unless such action or proceeding is brought by the Trustee. 8 This Deed "r Trost applies to, inures to the benefit of, and is binding not only on the parties hereto, but on their heirs. devisers, legatees, administrators, executors, and assigns. The term Beneficiary shall mean the holder and owner of the note secured hereby, whether or not named as Beneficiary herein. Dated: February 25. 1998 v KEITH DEMPS, SR. ANNETTE B. DEMPS State of Washington }ss. County of King I certif.; that I know or have satisfactory evidence that KEITH DEMPS, SR. and ANNETTE B. DEMPS is are the persons) who appeared before me, and said person(s) acknowledged that THEY signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be THEIR free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in this instrument. t` Dated. • l L 1i \\!• r Notary PubIiQ in and for the State of Vt;asiiing;cr Residing at .l My appointment expires i • , j 4 i REQUEST FOR FULL RECONVEYANCE Do not record.To be used only when note has been paid. . TO:TRUSTEE The undersigned is the legal owner and holder of the note and all other indebtedness secured by the within Deed of Trust.Said note, together with all other indebtedness secured by said Deed of Trust,has been fully paid and satisfied:and you are hereby requested and directed,on payment to you of any sums owing to you under the terms of said Deed of Trust,to cancel said note above mentioned, and all other evidences of indebtedness secured by said Deed of Trust delivered to you herewith. together with the said Deed of Trust, and to reconvey, without warranty, to the parties designated by the terms of said Deed of Trust,all the estate now hold by you thereunder. Dated: , 19 • I I r C tPol C e+ C ti •ke • {at t` W-938 —et - EXCISE TAX NOT REWIRED Co. Dadxn uTILITIEs rl '-^- Deputy ZASEMENI THIS INSTRUMENT, sada this lSf' day of lY24_r4.- , 19a17. by and between • EMMA CUGINI • • hereinafter called "Crantor(s)', and the CITY OF RENTON, a Municipal Corporation QDof King County, Washington, hereinafter called 'Grantee'. O ' WITNESSETH: "'- That said Grantor(s), for en in consideration of the sun of $ 1.0) .�=, paid by Grantee, and other valuable consideration, do by these presents, grant, C bargain, sell, convey, and warrant unto the said Grantee, its successors and =� Ul assigns, an easement for wildlife habitat, flood control, public access, land- scaping, and public utilities (including water and sewer) with necessary appur- tenances over, through, across and upon the following described property in King i 1 County, Washington, more particularly described as follows: J, i e 1 EASE ENT FOR SOUTHWESTERLY FIRE HYDRANT I An easement in Lot 4 of the Tino Cugini Short Plat No. 2 recorded under Auditor's i File No. 7910189001, said Short Flat being in the Northwest quarter of Section 16. Township 23 North, Range 5 East of the Willamette Meridian, City of Renton, King County, Washington, said easement being 7.5 feet each side of the following • described centerline: : 4 ! BEGINNING at a point in the Southerly line of said Lot 4 that is Southwesterly, 13.50 feet along said Southerly line from the Southeast corner of the afore said ; Lot 4; THENCE North 27' 26' 27' West, 10.20 feet to the TERMINUS of this centerline. 1 _$ Q1 4. I Z r • t //11 � 1C _C t 11,iv .'. ' 1'-,:: 11"T i.irfl XIII t .;,�NCpil Bliw. ' i 1 1964.42 I a� T Said heretofore mentioned grantee. Its successors or assigns, shall have the right. without prior notice or proceeding at law. at such times som yobetruct- necessary to enter upon said above described property for the purpose ing, maintaining, repairing, altering or reconstructing said utilities, or making any connections therewith, without incurring any legal obligations or liability therefore, provided, that such con:truction, maintaining. repairing, altering or reconstruction of said utilities shall be accomplished in such a manner that the • private.irprovements existing in the rights)-of-way shall not be disturbed or damaged, they will be replaced in as good a condition as they were immediately before the property was entered upon by the Grantee. The Grantor shall fully use and enjoy the aforedescribed premises. including the right to retain the right to use the surface of said right-of-way if such use does not interfere with installation end maintenance of the utilities. However. the grantor shall not erect buildings or structures over. under or across the right-of-way during the existence of such utilities. This easement. shall be a covenant running with the land and shall be binding en the Grantor, his successors, heirs and assigns. Grantors covenant that they are the lawful owners of the above properties and that they have a good and lawful right to execute this agreement. EMMA CUGINI l.' w.,? Imo `. CDCl SFr •r- . Cl ql STATE OF 1lAS}i1NGTQN ==gin • COUNTY OF KING I, the undersigned, a notary public in and for the State of Washington, hereby . certify that on this Is'day of YNn P2c-" 19e:personally appeared l 4 before re �r •'? J i and i. a ti and and ; to me known to be individual CO described to end who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that -�..,_ i signed and sealed the same as .f free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. i , i t . Diary u c n and for he State of Washington. residing at( s- 1-- '� i ; Y?.P_: G:L w Wmixa, :1a luxe, . .•••• —_ _ _-_ _—_ . _ I struoed. anc uckn a :o me that they signed and sealed the instrument as their fro. and vo1• rn.,ary act and deed _ e uses and purioses therein mentioned. 'ITT SS my hand and offleial seal hereto affixed the day and :ear in this certificate late. written. H. I. Notarial Seal) 1. H. "VES i t Notary Public in and for the State of (Cos. Ex. Jan. 31, 1929) ' i (I. R. S. :.50 attached and cancelled) T.ashington, residing at Coapeville c Filed for record a: request of B. J. ;Melton, Aug. 17, 1925 at 29 min past 10 AM D. E. FERGUSON. County Auditor s . $ _ Si- :.< 2059619 EARL A. PHILLIPS, et u- 0 TO WARRANTY TEED i W. C. SDTTON TEE GPANTOPS EARL A. PHILLIPS and DOROTHY M. PHILLIPS his wife both of Seattle Washington et for and in consideration of Ono Thousand (41000.00) Dollars in band paid, convey and warrant to W. C. i SD'1TON a widower of Seattle, Wash the grantee the following described real estate: Lot Nine (9) and the West Ha1f (West ir) of Lot Eight (8), in Block Nine (9), 2nd addition , to Lam Union. Subject to a contract of perches° of same by William P. Kane and Geneva Kane Ms wife ! which contract we hereby assign to W. C. Sutton. Situated in the County of King. State of Washington. • ;Vv }, - Dated August 15th, A. D. 1925. ;,,:,: i Signed in presence of EARL A. PHILLIPS q'y: DOROTHY M. PHILLIPS a ':: STATE OF WASHINGTON ) a ' F�, ))SS " COUNTY OF KING 1: THIS IS TO CERTIFY, that on this 15th day of August A.D. 1925 before me the undersigned a . notary public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn personally cane EARL A. fi!:::. PHILIIPS and DOROTHY M. PHILLIPS his wife both of Seattle Washington to ma known to be the individuals : - t.� described in and who executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that they signed and sealed - • ' _ the sane as their free and voluntary • act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. ' WITNESS my lead and official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. _ _ (IN W. H. Notarial Seal) li)RACE W. WALL .Y '`a- ' (Com. Ex. Deo. 10, 1926) • Notary Public in and for the State I t (I. R. S. $1.00 attached and cancelled) of Washington, residing at Seattle ;. Filed for record at request of W. C. Sutton, Aug. 17, 1925 at 38 min past 10 AU !' z' ::'. . AB D. E. FERGUSON, County Auditor a 11 V,•: • ',. j ii 3 2060098 ! OIAND H. HARTLEY, Governor z :' TO ' DEED 1' _ _ JENNIE SARTORI, et al STATE OF WASHINGTON IN C SSIDSPATION OF Four thn:sand six hundred and no/100 04,600.00) dollars, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the State of Iashino cn does hereby grant, bargain, sell and convey unto ili JEHIIIi SARTORI, TS:TSA M. SBARBOF.:O, LAURA _:. RTORI and KA::CE.WE SARTORI, Devisees under the Will of Tgrnzio Sartori, deceased their heirs and aarigna, the following described Sohool lands, situated it King County, Washington, to-. It: The northwest quarter of the north-roct :carter of section sixteen (16), tor'nshil t-wcnty- three (23) narth, range five (5) east of the Fillamotte Meridian, containing 40 acres, more or loss, ac- cording to the goverrnent survey thereof. Excoptin_ ar.! reserving the right of way heretofore aoquired by the ::,.oqualaie favor Coto'n i ..r i 7ve p.,r pw,.4. F The atuve desoribe_ lands are sold subjeot to al) the provisions of Chapter 109 Jf the1. F M Sections lima of 1911, to which reference is hereby cn c, and which shall be as binding upon the grantee or anysuocosaore in intorrst of said + :.:rr�.rtee as thwa,-h set out at length herein. . r 335 •The grantor hereby expressly saves, excepts and resents out of the grant bsrlaby elide unto itt t.. self, its successors and assigns forever, all oils, gases, coal, ores, minerals and fossils of every naswi . 'x kind or description, and which may be in or upon said lands above described or any part thereof, and the I t `_. i , 7. right to explore tie- -awe for such oil, gases, coal, ores, minerals and fossil; a� 1t also krerwby ur- pressly saves and reserves out of the grant hereby made, unto itself, its successors and assigns, forever' the right to enter by itself, its agents, attorneys and servants upon said lands or any Fart or p►rta i '� taws,thereof, at any and all tis, for the purpose of opening developing and-working sines thereon. and ` '� :`�' ' out and removing therefrom all such oils, gases, coal, ores, minerals and fossils, and.to that end it Steen ; At ther expressly reserves out of the grant hereby made, unto itself, its successors and assigns forever& s •: right by its or their agents, servants and attorneys at any and all times to erect, oonstruct maintain andi ...1.a . la R ute all such uiidings, machinery, roads a n find railroads, sink such shafts, ranee such soil, and to on said lands or any part thereof, for the business of mining and to occupy as mach of said land as say /_ ' 11 necessary or convenient for the successfu: prosecution of such mining business, hereby expressly resew- ':.' ing to itself, its suocessors and assigns as aforesaid, generally, all rights and poeers.in.to and over •1-:'} said lands, whether herein expressed or not, reasonably necessary or convenient to render beneficial and '�=• efficient the complete enjoynerr .f the property and rights hereby expressly reserved': �''' rovided, that no rights shall be exercised under this reservation by the State, its successors le_a..:. or assigns, until provision has been made by the State, its auoceesora or assigns, to pay to the owner of, . .. `: , t • the land upon which the rights herein reserved to the State, its successors or assigns or sought to be ex- :�T excised, full payment for all damages sustained by said owner, by reason of entering upon said land. `,. I '' 1 TO HAVF. AND TO HOLD the said premises, with their appurtenances, unto the said JENNIIE SARTORI .` -. ERSILIA 1. SBARBCRO, LAURA SARTORI, and SASHERII1E SARTORI, Devisees under the Will of Ig:leio Sartori, des ceased. their heirs and assigns forever. ZT ESS the seal of the State, affixed this 22d dayof.Jnly, A.D. 1925 4' (The Seal of the State of Washington) ROLASD H. HARTIEY, Governor Attest: A. M. Kitto , Assistant Seoretar `. i of State. 1_ :I, J. State F.ecord of Deeds, Volume 7, page 321. t ' •_ App. No. 9830. a , Cont. No. 9276. =' Filed for record at request of J. Sartori, Aug. 18, 1925 at 04 min pest 9 Ali %ta L_______11±..B D. E. FERGUSON, County Auditor 1= .k is i I • r• e • 2000193 I CBAP.IES DIED A]III l,: TO WARRANTY DEE^ H-;:ARD C. KRUG T?E GRAITIOR CHARLES DIvI1UJiB for and in consideration of Thirty-One Hundred Dollars in hand aid, ooneeys and earranta to IldrARD C. KRUG the following described real estate: '' ..F Lot Thirty-three (33), Block Three (3), vroode Green Lake hark Ad,lition to the City of Seattle] . (This(This deed is given persuant to a written r'ntract executed to one G. E. Thompson, and the Y ,. G grantees hereof are to be construed subject to acid contract and after the date thereof are limited to << acts of the,snid grantor.) Ii' Situnted in the Count• of King, State of Washington. ''•'; 1 Datod thin 7th day of August 1925. Pti. -:r:%SaES: CHARLES DI EIllAtra SEAL t.'• Si a, OF •,"ASIIINGTOH t € f F SS T YftTY OF KING ` the undersigned, a notary public), do hereby certify that on this 14th day of August, 1925,i '=:i 1 ?nrsonnl'y appeared he fare we raa.?L_S Ci1LW.3H L. :se Imam to be the individual described in, and who ex-! 1 ocutod the within inntnr=ont, and acknowleiged that he signed and sealed the same as his free and volun- � ' tary not and deed for the usre and purposes therein nenti r.od. Given undor :r, hand and if,-iciui soul this kith day of August. A.D. 1925 is • ZO-2I f t TINO CUGINI SHORT PLAT 2 K} - IN THE N.W 1/4 OF N W. 1/4, SECTION I6 TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.W. RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASIiINGTON 38ft-79 _— _��_-) \ t . ..'JOG•ir 45.316 • - • . soJ�lc• , DESCRIPTION Ott Ow~maw O/M a i9 goirefs Ili 100141E'4'4414e110t _ I •SUMO,s TIN..cvm+Y}staRlti ANON"ANC w..t R7l'ECIOArTY,ArAONANR( 471814s.s Aill/..'R 41I10..1.4.r i SAIIMtT coil r l.F)rt♦.r11.' 7 41.•tlat COna001119.arfo.eam[ArSM cram"Ac•Ostw'74ap -A'—r - - IVL WLA4o•_AsN.Ar Qlri.lYd Alto IA[T•POIAJCs.f rod a'.r.s1r41 ♦IAN bRf7<A'ssnr V Ake AlimY.A/L...D7Al 6A1T+JK AP Mil lstX OP `•, @ $ lTl. mesa•MiAY 7Nr_7Cat As]Q..ASV a mooriT HIdAOfo Av rei.I.1 10411G/ 'f 11 - areas'R.As Ass"seams O'sao cwansf.o'LSa/Q soO w _S, 1.^fir Ai Mglf. • .1 • �.....e-..� .7A1pO 4•!71277.a37,uaD.psirs/tom 4 - 'V P...La•rljL a.-J..,ulrwiiV onMtat OP OK AARrHaaff p.•e7w;71a0rJ A • • h :Mt 77-i.4~4 Kr AisTL.Ai w las cl D•egfaR PIPET A nom"tour., 0 4 i R•14mus a.ncs.r Tat AjLIA,Alsasr iw,a•oat.m11.14174w ora.7 mg • • aorrrrrs.cw:7.swAi Pawl!s LAWTUrMMr,rw.lotMC71tr - t • ILLI - 1 kJ --A ` N XOO'i 1 meet,t7t'•C • • aC 0EDICAT70N Q•• �,r e "FARR.At 'i t IAI Or 7A%W Me vK Ai sfyrf.7vs LweitVOL4,4 et fi3 Of I ,� J AK g......e•+Aa 7K i.ac.Nel__RA77SR~SOP AMAIN el*IV7AA/ rn p s+�'- s r rm s O IV A 'AN"mac/apoi!OW elrmr.11.rsw .aa rA. .--t _ .i I .@ A.l3swt4S'wtas....op*TYA Aarl aY%aAN"41%4 ND 776sC7'i'To 771e - _ L` ow AR raw+tb..c Ia.es►�ts$TfAN 7 Y.aa1ra►alp- _ _ ' Z Z ® e _ Ts j • LIJ /MAO. AltstvD. \ e. 1a.K. ri a CERTIFICATE \ • '�4 "11.."‘ ossumwr I Jj J i Y airily THAT Iy{TNE IMLRS Will.tet4.TM *WA(s] \ •, ` 21G1?!!" _ IA !-j-`---- GOO-- : ' Je t IA TEE SIDLE OF THE L NEORT ►tATtMD IN TMIS SNONT PEAT. \TrJICTX ' - - -711 SURVYOS TE IS AAP CORaEtTLT M No rossorl A 11MYCT At ST tiK Yu Ot AER : TN AO+'C MOT PM 11 IRECT ION !A CANTOAPANCE VITA TTE RSOUI RLMFMTS OF T1IA APPROVALS � N[�•4 SaTTET IE sSpd? CoAKIRi ACT AT THE AMEST _tjJ4(! /T sus IIIENT Dormers aim removes tole dl SAT of aI/ A.G. 1421. _STATE OF TOKEN IMTI — -- _ CI1/7T >! Om Si. /s pp fif -7��6� -` S[LCC TOA. p[f'E. OF }1alIC ems THIS IN TO CIA IIF TWIT OA TNrt__DAT Of/.r iagisK A.D. (VOID lTA rt.1OV17.>rre ! 1ljXlEfewe K M mots ram A EIPTART PItStl . f[AfLr u.v EAIMTION DATI /ks�/LSD l E E pp worms TICS Dar Of Ot T A.D. IV� fherwrco `��_ 4 ir...�_ Cl ..: ��'"`� ---yre 1 Tort MOAN TO NE M morn R OL MI Mao AMC) no WYERECORDING . CERTIFICATE TNAfftc EISIrIEN -- CERTIFICATE AnACAIOKIKED TO NETMAT _SUE/ THE LANE RECORDING at_t(ILt__ TIME Ala YOCtai1*T ACT IS HER. .► E.UNINED we Arp,,,n TMIt ' art 11F l�MA.1. AllF1um ow R ccoto Tits !Q }AT to /lrr__ A.1). omits: IS MAC Aso OFFICIAL PEAL TIE Oil AN/ TEAK fIRV MCA INII TWA. 1 "-. ATI.m.. is b00[_zQ_M stirrers ON hit 214_____ A(11;1441 ; i6reall1114.---- AT M REOUElT CR '>I — jjj - irk M tfn t>F-EE1Tta. EToiIIISI Ms ARr�RNTTJ TII111Z1RAT a_ 1l A-�. ��� • *ow erotic It ►oN M STATE TI of _S L uZ c- zI/OM - _LAZE i t_ ss z MV�j..Srt 1 LAY - Q -hY` rltMIIgT011 IR st11114 AT$ IWMtttl ,.j% 9nENIRMII[+E11 Of ITECDR/E Drool, Gown Atstss0N SDK Cohort RI/tf1Oi1 Lao Av..7. .0 4x-I 7e *.'. 10• ., .1 I;• .i %. 'P-` r '"r: S w::9 23= ass N'89,-12 42W. .1(,. , ( ems'. /e 9 Ant Nt/7I VI, Aft% ) h �'n '3— I ss '1 ._ .do ..• • J 67 : ��- .3J.ss/•&A .I - JJi.a4.f1 r _. _._ .. RENSP38P-7% 7910119004 4 w 0 � p 'h_ �0 LOTsii r LOT I 4 LOT 2 N ��A • �'a t • o- �V .vis..•...A. i LOT 1 se / Al'41 sr/l `t� r r, . o- � �i � CS c REN.3P384-79- 7910189001 $ LOT 3 �� �: 191 • ye 4' 40 o ii pc., •'E iri. AY' 1 LOT 3 4 n LOT 4 r°o� '. 0.*0 `1 ♦4° 4i• v v w 16e ri. s R II It ii b Y !l ® ' is/,J• ' /..---- . 0 se ,irt el 1 ,----- .>S) Y V ,� _ SLw.of ^1.593.13- •h 00 J , N 61• 12- sew O hs se cV - tn THIS SKETCH I.:FOR LOCATION PURPOSES ONLY&IS NOT BASED ON AN ACTUAL SURVEY. THE COMPANY ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR ANY INACCURACIES THEREIN. OLD REPUBLIC TITLE,LTD. Jul - 13-98 03 : 56P P.01 • )C=Dr 1(::.1r l 1•':'0:•I'ACIF4.AVE.`i !an1L A. IA(:OMA WA 9M444.(..X- ,J(.-- 1_)(2_ WI',I!HI:11.,Ak ',it 1;,n. Ia)NNI.n.IINC.ENC;IN1-1-11 LEVEL I DOWNSTREAM ANALYSTS FOR • CHANTELLE APARTMENTS 2R00 NE 34 ST Renton,WA 98056 July 13, 1998 oNPN 0yA• �of,., :if, §lp 41r, I. _: 1.4:/,, .. . 444 ..°C lb?..' 0 44, ‘, * ' T E 13:27/1&99 Prepared for , t amps: 2308 NE 24th Street •;, Renton,WA 98056 1-425-226-6632 C ( Project Architect: (ZGe — -�,, Fall Architectural - 4115 SW 106`"ST v - -', 'i.;, Seattle,WA 98146 '''I `'cp 1-206-431.7960 0 Jul - 13-98 03 : 57P P.02 Chanrelle Apartments Project overview This project involves constructing 3 buildings with a total of 17 apartment until and one manager's office and required landscaping,driveways and parking areas. The project is located At 2R00 NF. 3'd Strcct, Renton. Adjacent properties are multifamily developments to the west and north,and a convenience store with gasoline retail to the east. The project site is currently vacant. • Level I Downstream Drainage gnajyFia The site receives minimal runoff from adjacent uphill properties,these developments have existing storm drainage systems with their own conveyance to existing drainage system in NE 3'4 Street. Runoff from the site drains to an existing public Catchbasin Number 18 D2-7 located in NE 3r°Street frontage. This catchbasin is part of a conveyance system in NE 3rd Street flowing westerly towards Edmonds Avenue NE which is approximately 1/2 mile downstream of the subject site. A site inspectidn and a review of the As- Constructed plan and profile sheets for this street drainage show no obvious drainage problems_ Jul - 13 911.35 03 : 57P P . 03 JVL- -7tl PI./P. 7 . 11 ♦I 1.1_1- y.!MI' . A•••\. 9 e.P,v•1.0 COO O•VO . JOJ r.01 ,'FUN , I� oir C!_ t •ti L ao • R (corm: n.r 1 ' 119�_. -• - "- me • 1a.I►�.- '. ---- 4N . y ni.. -1 Y • ��j777F i , • , [.1' ` • %. El. ... . . .. / . . .....o.K. • • . • ot ii: ii,___r_ * 4 ' .:�' ' asz. .1..IEL ,:rint t 11,116:' *t. ' .itif P' ..t; 1411.1, , ,r •,..114, .,,•.a ♦ _ Ai, ��'�. sz 11;pi*-.r„..--K1,...„ � `',ate_rn ca =7, 1 . . ":.i. s' i . I V t ' i . I ' A mi. . , .. 1 l Wi'.° . 'ftp_ill Vell '. ill"... • , IL tt, = _- ' �1. + 7 ■air. is -- ��.A �� , Y Y �, . J ifjir It' 4./eAtt;12, . 1 1 i t PI i f '. trital6 • r ..'. .''. • r, it ..... J •Cori gni; atimArLr• : 411. 0_,._.KINIg... MIME 1I,la Ine `�L'!. ,... r ‘011"" 111 ,-.1-• Mr" A 7 IRV. ...14. , ,__ _____ -'mm6.4'7.-2111 Neve A • 1ph, D?�_ Oil � Fib 14 i .,,u• •. ' �u .' W .=MIFERItritt ,••• (VCR:1W, "Wir.IkfP .04 4,1 der '..: -, . ' 4 • tUr - .., 1iiq:'i +A,d.4 i.t.'.a i1.' • f 'vi - T , . - cr 14G-Ifiii,F.n,f..i,rm.liia4i.t,i...li k.dl.Ai,i i._..'l•-i9 k• ',;I7 1._ r.... 4'-'-\'i*i,-.•,'.,-. ;I,,,.e *•.,,„-..3'.:' .L*To..>,':*,I,Cz-,44<c 11t.0'.-.k%.r ' o MAP L EW00 1- arrr 20 21 • t / • !1 Imo. P+ `7r' 1 . - ri„ a644` - - . 4 k - T.. FA I WOO •u C oi 0 iI ' I. • I 1.01 r . _ 4, f ENTIRE I CITY asss • S W. 9—23—5 OF F i 0 /�i I -re. idly J `. - R ia�r� ,. i7� t- ti. REAtSP ..,s., r a o 382-g 17910119004 . w _ - 'r_. LOT I ti LOT 2 LOT 2 ��. , ° �• ,op . *. &l.ie..0 e.- -LOT 1 IP i4 ;,ems A� 1 %so f� ; iiJ.s> f o c I" O. IL. 1.SP384-79- 7910189001 4 LOT d , Gs O T 3 ;; LOT 4 • � k 1•6 4 p �� o v P."WI / .a • r ,a..• ; M • A'. POI! 01 isa•a�r`arsi �i o -r ----'''.- /10001101 5 v s o 1 "= IOC) / a., GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY PROPOSED CHANTELLE APARTMENTS 28XX NORTHEAST THIRD STREET RENTON, WASHINGTON E-8307 July 6, 1998 PREPARED FOR A & D QUALITY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 707)X,20 Mitchell G. McGinnis Staff Geologist (S. S. 4‘ � C3 WASP, 644) �t'�� ,. CEO"� •a i 4691 Robert S. Levinson, P.E. Principal EXPIRES 03/07/C0 Earth Consultants, Inc. 1805 - 136th Place Northeast, Suite 201 DV'.7' 077 IT F, Bellevue, Washington 98005 CITY OF kEI i u. (425) 643-3780 JUL. 14 1JC8 RECEIVED L — -PORTANT INFORMATIC 'T ABOUT YOUR GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT More construction problems are caused by site subsur- technical engineers who then render an opinion about face conditions than any other factor. As troublesome as overall subsurface conditions, their likely reaction to subsurface problems can be,their frequency and extent proposed construction activity,and appropriate founda- have been lessened considerably in recent years, due in tion design. Even under optimal circumstances actual large measure to programs and publications of ASFE/ conditions may differ from those inferred to exist, The Association of Engineering Firms Practicing in because no geotechnical engineer, no matter how the Geosciences. qualified,and no subsurface exploration program, no The following suggestions and observations are offered matter how comprehensive,can reveal what is hidden by earth, rock and time. The actual interface between mate- to help you reduce the geotechnical-related delays, rials may be far more gradual or abrupt than a report cost-overruns and other costly headaches that can indicates. Actual conditions in areas not sampled may occur during a construction project. differ from predictions. Nothing can be done to prevent the unanticipated, but steps can be taken to help minimize their A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING impact. For this reason, most experienced owners retain their IS BASED ON A UNIQUE SET geotechnical consultants through the construction stage,to iden- REPORTtify variances,conduct additional tests which may be OF PROJECT-SPECIFIC FACTORS needed,and to recommend solutions to problems A geotechnical engineering report is based on a subsur- faceencountered on site. exploration plan designed to incorporate a unique SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS set of project-specific factors. These typically include: the general nature of the structure involved, its size and CAN CHANGE configuration; the location of the structure on the site and its orientation; physical concomitants such as Subsurface conditions may be modified by constantly- access roads, parking lots,and underground utilities, changing natural forces. Because a geotechnical engi- and the level of additional risk which the dient assumed neering report is based on conditions which existed at by virtue of limitations imposed upon the exploratory the time of subsurface exploration,construction decisions program. To help avoid costly problems, consult the should not be based on a geotechnical engineering report whose geotechnical engineer to determine how any factors adequacy may have been affected by time. Speak with the geo- which change subsequent to the date of the report may technical consultant to learn if additional tests are affect its recommendations. advisable before construction starts. Unless your consulting geotechnical engineer indicates Construction operations at or adjacent to the site and otherwise, your geotechnical engineering report should not natural events such as floods,earthquakes or ground- be used: water fluctuations may also affect subsurface conditions •When the nature of the proposed structure is and, thus, the continuing adequacy of a geotechnical changed, for example, if an office building will be report. The geotechnical engineer should be kept erected instead of a parking garage,or if a refriger- apprised of any such events,and should be consulted to ated warehouse will be built instead of an unre- determine if additional tests are necessary frigerated one; •when the size or configuration of the proposed GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES ARE structure is altered; PERFORMED FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES •when the location or orientation of the proposed AND PERSONS structure is modified; •when there is a change of ownership. or Geotechnical engineers' reports are prepared to meet •for application to an adjacent site. the specific needs of specific individuals. A report pre- Geotechnical engineers cannot accept responsibility for problems pared for a consulting civil engineer may not be ade- which may develop if they are not consulted after factors consid- quate for a construction contractor, or even some other ered in their report's development have changed. consulting civil engineer. Unless indicated otherwise. this report was prepared expressly for the client involved and expressly for purposes indicated by the client. Use MOST GEOTECHNICAL "FINDINGS" by any other persons for any purpose, or by the client ARE PROFESSIONAL ESTIMATES for a different purpose, may result in problems. No indi- vidual other than the client should apply this report for its Site exploration identifies actual subsurface conditions intended purpose without first conferring with the geotechnical only at those points where samples are taken, when engineer. No person should apply this report for any purpose they are taken. Data derived through sampling and sub- other than that originally contemplated without first conferring sequent laboratory testing are extrapolated by geo- with the geotechnical engineer ��� Earth Consultants Inc. Geotechnical Engineers.Geologists&Environmental Scientists July 6, 1998 E-8307 A & D Quality Construction Company P.O. Box 2552 Renton, Washington 98056 Attention: Ms. Annette Demps Dear Ms. Demps: We are pleased to submit our report titled "Geotechnical Engineering Study, Proposed Chantelle Apartments, 28XX Northeast Third Street, Renton, Washington." This report presents the results of our field exploration, selective laboratory tests, and engineering analyses. The purpose and scope of our study was outlined in our May 29, 1998 proposal. Based on the subsurface conditions encountered at the site, it is our opinion the proposed buildings may be supported using conventional spread and continuous footing foundation systems bearing on competent native soils or on structural fill used to modify site grades. Slab-on-grade or wood floors may be similarly supported. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to you. If you have any questions, or if we can be of further assistance, please call. Respectfully submitted, EARTH CONSULTANTS, INC. Robert S. Levinson, P.E. Principal MGM/SD D/RSL/kml 1805-136th Place N.E.,Suite 201, Bellevue,Washington 98005 Bellevue(425)643-3780 Seattle(206)464-1584 FAX(425)74-608-60 Tacoma(253)272-6608 TABLE OF CONTENTS E-8307 PAGE INTRODUCTION 1 General 1 Project Description 1 SITE CONDITIONS 2 Surface 2 Subsurface 2 Groundwater 3 Laboratory Testing 3 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 3 General 3 Site Preparation and General Earthwork 5 Foundations 6 Slab-on-Grade Floors 7 Seismic Design Considerations 7 Excavations and Slopes 8 Site Drainage 9 Pavement Areas 9 Utility Support and Backfill 10 LIMITATIONS 10 Additional Services 11 APPENDICES Appendix A Field Exploration Appendix B Laboratory Test Results ILLUSTRATIONS Plate 1 Vicinity Map Plate 2 Test Pit Location Plan Plate 3 Typical Footing Subdrain Detail Plate 4 Utility Trench Backfill Plate Al Legend Plates A2 through Al Test Pit Logs Plate B1 Grain Size Analysis Earth Consultants, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY • PROPOSED CHANTELLE APARTMENTS 28xx NORTHEAST THIRD STREET RENTON, WASHINGTON E-8307 INTRODUCTION General This report presents the results of our geotechnical engineering study for the proposed Chantelle Apartment complex in Renton, Washington. The general location of the site is shown on the Vicinity Map, Plate 1 . The purpose of this study was to explore the subsurface conditions at the site and based on the conditions encountered to provide specific geotechnical recommendations for the proposed development. At the time our study was performed, the site, proposed buildings and our exploratory locations were approximately as shown on the Test Pit Location Plan, Plate 2. Project Description We understand it is currently planned to develop the approximately one acre site with an eighteen (18) unit apartment complex consisting of three, three-story buildings with the basement levels two to three feet below existing grade. To reach finished floor elevations, fills of approximately one foot will be required within the footprints of the buildings. Three foot high berms will be placed around portions of the buildings. The proposed apartments will be of relatively lightly loaded wood-frame construction with slab-on-grade or wood joist floors above crawl spaces. Based on our experience with this type of construction, we anticipate wall loads will be on the order of three to four kips per lineal foot, column loads of eighty (80) to one hundred (100) kips and slab-on-grade floor loads of about one hundred fifty (150) pounds per square foot. The buildings will be surrounded by asphalt paved parking and driveway areas. Vehicle traffic will consist of passenger vehicles and occasional service trucks. If any of the above design criteria are incorrect or change, we should be consulted to review the recommendations contained in this report. In any case, ECI should be retained to perform a general review of the final design. Earth Consultants, Inc. i l A & D Quality Construction Company E-8307 • July 6, 1998 Page 2 SITE CONDITIONS Surface The subject site is an approximately one acre, undeveloped residential parcel located on the north side of Northeast Third Street in Renton (see Plate 1 , Vicinity Map). The property is bounded to the west and north by existing apartment buildings, to the south by Northeast Third Street, and to the east by an AM-PM Gas Station. The site is essentially flat, with little discernible elevation change across most of the site. The immediate northern portion of the site does contain a gradual, approximately two to three foot high, south-facing slope. At the time of our subsurface exploration, the site was vegetated with grass and dense brush. Subsurface Subsurface conditions were evaluated by excavating nine test pits at the approximate locations shown on Plate 2. Please refer to the Test Pit Logs, Plates A2 through A10, for a more detailed description of the subsurface conditions encountered at each test pit location. A description of field exploration methods is included in Appendix A. The following is a generalized description of the conditions encountered. At all of our test pit locations, we encountered a surficial layer of topsoil and duff. The topsoil and duff layer was typically three to four inches thick and ranged up to eight inches thick at Test Pits TP-5 and TP-7. The topsoil and duff was characterized by its brown color and the presence of abundant roots and other organic material and its loose consistency. This soil is not suitable for use in support of foundations, slabs-on-grade or pavements. In addition, it is not suitable for use as structural fill, nor should it be mixed with material to be used as structural fill. Underlying the surficial topsoil layer at all of our test pit locations we encountered a layer of loose to medium dense fill comprised of silty sand (Unified Soil Classification SM). The fill ranged from one and one-half feet thick to eleven (1 1 ) feet thick as observed in Test Pit TP-1 . The fill appears to be thickest in the center of the site with less fill observed around the perimeter. A steeply west dipping fill contact was observed in Test Pit TP-3 where one and one-half feet of fill was observed on the east side of the test pit while over five feet was observed on the west side. Test Pit TP-3 may have been excavated within trench backfill for an existing sewer line that is apparently located within the immediate western portion of the site. The fill was typically characterized by its distinct salt and pepper gray color and the presence of a large number of bottles and miscellaneous debris. Earth Consultants, Inc. L A & D Quality Construction company E-8307 July 6, 1998 Page 3 Underlying the fill, we observed silty sand (SM), poorly graded sand (SP), poorly graded sand with silt (SP-SM), with varying amounts of gravel. The upper two to three feet of the observed native soils were typically loose. The native soils then became medium dense to the maximum exploration depth of thirteen and one-half (13.5) feet below existing grade. Groundwater No groundwater seepage was observed at any of our test pit locations. As such, we do not anticipate groundwater seepage will be encountered in site excavations. However, the contractor should be aware that groundwater levels are not static. There will likely be fluctuations in the groundwater level depending on the season, amount of rainfall, surface water runoff, and other factors. Seepage levels and flow rates are typically higher in the wetter winter months (typically October through May). The contractor should be prepared to control groundwater if seepage is encountered in site excavations. Laboratory Testing Laboratory tests were conducted on several representative soil samples to verify or to modify the field soil classification and to evaluate the general physical properties and engineering characteristics of the soils encountered. Visual field classifications were supplemented by grain size analyses on representative soil samples. Moisture content tests were performed on all samples. The results of laboratory tests performed on specific samples are provided either at the appropriate sample depth on the individual test pit logs or on a separate data sheet contained in Appendix B. It is important to note that these test results may not accurately represent the overall in-situ soil conditions. Our geotechnical recommendations are based on our interpretation of these test results and their use in guiding our engineering judgement. ECI cannot be responsible for the interpretation of these data by others. In accordance with our Standard Fee Schedule and General Conditions, the soil samples for this project will be discarded after a period of fifteen days following completion of this report unless we are otherwise directed in writing. DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS General Based on the results of our study, it is our opinion the site can be developed generally as planned. Building support can be provided using conventional spread and continuous footing foundation systems bearing on competent native soil or on two feet of structural fill. The existing fill was observed to be in a loose to medium dense condition and contains abundant glass bottles. Earth Consultants, Inc. 6 A & D Quality Constructiol ,ompany E-8307 July 6, 1998 Page 4 If fill is encountered at the footing or slab subgrade elevation, the fill should be overexcavated to two feet below the finished subgrade elevation and replaced with structural fill. Prior to placement of structural fill the overexcavation surface should be compacted in-place to the requirements of structural fill. If the overexcavation surface cannot be adequately compacted, the soil should be overexcavated to competent material and replaced with structural fill. There is a potential for differential settlement due to the variation of the fill and fill depth and also where footings will cross a transition from support on native soils to support on existing fills. There is also a potential for differential settlement due to the placement of the three foot high berm around portions of the buildings. To reduce the effects of differential settlement on the buildings, the following measures should be taken. • The three foot high berm should be placed at least two weeks prior to the start of building construction. • All interior footings should be tied together in a continuous grid to the perimeter footings. No individual footing pads should be used. The footings should be designed to free span a distance of ten feet at any point on the footing. • Extra reinforcement should be placed in the foundations five feet on both sides of this native/fill transition. This may occur in the northerly two buildings. With these measures, we anticipate total post-construction settlements will be on the order of one and one-half inch, with differential settlements across the building of approximately one inch. Most of these settlements should occur as the building loads are applied due to the granular nature of the existing fills. If this range of settlement cannot be tolerated, the buildings may be surcharged with two feet of surcharge fill over the finished floor elevation. We will be available to provide more detailed recommendations should you choose this option. Another alternative would be to utilize a wood floor system with crawl space. The excavation for the crawl space will have acted as a surcharge. With either the surcharge or crawl space, the footings should still be tied together in a continuous grid. This study has been prepared for specific application to this project only and in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by other members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions in this area for the exclusive use of A & D Quality Construction Company and their representatives. No warranty, expressed or implied, is made. This report, in its entirety, should be included in the project contract documents for the information of the contractor. Earth Consultants, Inc. A & D Quality Constructior _ )mpany E-8307 July 6, 1998 Page 5 Site Preparation and General Earthwork Building, pavement, and areas to receive structural fill should be stripped and cleared of all surface vegetation, organic matter, existing utility lines and any other deleterious material. Existing utility pipes to be abandoned should be plugged or removed so they do not provide a conduit for water and cause soil saturation and potential instability problems. Based on the thickness of the topsoil and root layers encountered at our test pit locations, we estimate a stripping depth of four to eight inches. Stripped materials should not be mixed with materials to be used as structural fill. Following the stripping operation, the ground surface where structural fill, slabs or foundations is to be placed should be observed by a representative of ECI. Proofrolling may also be necessary to identify loose or soft areas. The existing fill underlying much of the site is variable and in a loose to medium dense condition. If fill is encountered at the footing or slab subgrade elevation, the fill should be overexcavated to two feet below the finished subgrade elevation and replaced with structural fill. Prior to placement of the structural fill, the overexcavation surface should be compacted in-place to the requirements of structural fill. If adequate, in-place compaction cannot be accomplished, the soil should be removed and replaced with structural fill. Structural fill is defined as compacted fill placed under foundations, roadways, slabs, pavements or other load-bearing areas. Structural fill under foundations should be placed in horizontal lifts not exceeding twelve (12) inches in loose thickness and compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of its laboratory maximum dry density determined in accordance with ASTM Test Designation D-1557-91 (Modified Proctor). The fill materials should be placed at or near the optimum moisture content. Fill under pavements and walks should also be placed in horizontal lifts and compacted to 90 percent of maximum density except for the top twelve (12) inches which should be compacted to 95 percent of maximum density. During dry weather, most soils which are compactible and non-organic can be used as structural fill. Based on the results of our laboratory tests, the on-site soils at the time of our exploration appeared to be near the optimum moisture content and should be suitable for use in their present condition as structural fill, provided the grading operations are conducted during dry weather. However, laboratory testing indicates that some of the site soils have from nine percent to 25 percent fines passing the No. 200 sieve. These soils will degrade if exposed to excessive moisture, and compaction and grading will be difficult if the soil moistures increase significantly above their optimum conditions. Earth Consultants, Inc. A & D Quality Construction .ompany E-8307 July 6, 1998 Page 6 If the site soils are exposed to moisture and cannot be adequately compacted then it may be necessary to import a soil which can be compacted. During dry weather, non-organic compactible soil with a maximum grain size of six inches can be used. Fill for use during wet weather should consist of a fairly well graded granular material having a maximum size of six inches and no more than 5 percent fines passing the No. 200 sieve based on the minus 3/4- inch fraction. A contingency in the earthwork budget should be included for this possibility. Foundations Based on the encountered subsurface soil conditions, preliminary design criteria and assuming compliance with the preceding Site Preparation and Grading section, the proposed buildings may be supported on conventional spread and continuous footing foundation systems bearing on competent native soil or on two feet of structural fill. The existing fill is in a loose to medium dense condition. If fill is encountered at the footing subgrade elevation, the fill should be overexcavated to two feet below the finished subgrade elevation and replaced with structural fill. The overexcavation should extend at least one foot beyond foundation perimeters. Prior to placement of the structural fill, the overexcavation surface should be compacted in-place to the requirements of structural fill. If the overexcavation surface cannot be adequately compacted the fill should be overexcavated to competent soil and replaced with structural fill. For frost protection considerations, exterior foundation elements should be placed at a minimum depth of eighteen (18) inches below final exterior grade. Interior footings can be placed at a minimum depth of twelve (12) inches below the top of slab, except in unheated areas, where interior foundation elements should be founded at a minimum depth of eighteen (18) inches. Continuous footings should have a minimum width of eighteen (18) inches. All footings, both exterior and interior, should be tied together in a continuous grid. Individual pier footings are not recommended. The footings should be designed to free span a distance of ten feet at any point on the footing. The foundations may be designed for an allowable soil bearing capacity of two thousand five hundred (2,500) psf for competent native soil or structural fill. Loading of this magnitude would be provided with a theoretical factor-of-safety in excess of three against actual shear failure. For short-term dynamic loading conditions, a one-third increase in the above allowable bearing capacities can be used. The above allowable soil bearing value is for dead plus live loads and may be increased one- third for combined dead, live, wind, and seismic forces. For the above design criteria, total settlement of foundations is expected to be less than one inch. Differential settlements are expected to be less than one-half inch. The majority of the anticipated settlement should occur during construction as the dead loads are applied. Earth Consultants, Inc. A & D Quality Construction L,umpany E-8307 July 6, 1998 Page 7 Horizontal loads can be resisted by friction between the base of the foundation and the supporting soil and by passive soil pressure acting on the face of the buried portion of the foundation. For the latter, the foundation must be poured "neat" against competent native soils, or backfilled with structural fill. For frictional capacity, a coefficient of .35 can be used. For passive earth pressure, the available resistance can be computed using an equivalent fluid pressure of three hundred fifty (350) pcf. These lateral resistance values are allowable values, a factor-of-safety of 1 .5 has been included. As movement of the foundation element is required to mobilize full passive resistance, the passive resistance should be neglected if such movement is not acceptable. There may be fill/cut transitions across some of the buildings. Due to differing compression characteristics of the native soil and fill, differential movement should be expected between portions of the structure founded on the native and fill soils. In order to mitigate the potential for differential settlement, the reinforcing steel in the footings should be increased by placing two additional No. 4 sized reinforcing steel (rebar) in the upper half of the footing. The additional rebar should extend at least five feet beyond the transition in both directions. Footing excavations should be observed by a representative of ECI, prior to placing forms or rebar, to verify that conditions are as anticipated in this report. Slab-on-Grade Floors Slab-on-grade floors, if used, may be supported on competent native soil or on two feet of structural fill. Where fill is encountered at the slab subgrade elevation, the fill should be overexcavated to two feet below finished subgrade and replaced with structural fill. Disturbed subgrade soils should either be recompacted or replaced with structural fill. Concrete slabs should be provided with a minimum of four inches of free-draining sand or gravel. In areas where slab moisture is undesirable, a vapor barrier such as 6-mil plastic membrane should be placed beneath the slab. The vapor barrier should be sealed at the seams and care taken during construction not to damage it. At least two inches of damp sand may be placed over the membrane for protection during construction and to aid in curing of the concrete. Seismic Design Considerations The Puget Lowland is classified as a Seismic Zone 3 in the 1994 Uniform Building Code (UBC). Earthquakes occur in the Puget Lowland with regularity, however, the majority of these events are of such low magnitude they are not detected without instruments. Large earthquakes do occur, as indicated by the 1949, 7.2 magnitude earthquake in the Olympia area and the 1965, 6.5 magnitude earthquake in the Midway area. Earth Consultants, Inc. L.. A & D Quality Construction ,,umpany E-8307 July 6, 1998 Page 8 There are three potential geologic hazards associated with a strong motion seismic event at this site: ground rupture, liquefaction, and ground motion response. Ground Rupture: The strongest earthquakes in the Puget Lowland are widespread, subcrustal events, ranging in depth from thirty (30) to fifty-five (55) miles. Surface faulting from these deep events has not been documented to date. Therefore, it is our opinion, that the risk of ground rupture at this site during a strong motion seismic event is negligible. Liquefaction: Liquefaction is a phenomenon in which soils lose all shear strength for short periods of time during an earthquake. Groundshaking of sufficient duration results in the loss of grain to grain contact and a rapid increase in pore water pressure, causing the soil to behave as a fluid. To have a potential for liquefaction, a soil must be cohesionless with a grain size distribution of a specified range (generally sand and silt); it must be loose; it must be below the groundwater table; and it must be subject to sufficient magnitude and duration of groundshaking. The effects of liquefaction may be large total and/or differential settlement for structures founded in the liquefying soils. In our opinion, the potential for liquefaction induced settlement at the site is low. Ground Motion Response: The 1997 UBC Earthquake regulations contain a static force procedure and a dynamic force procedure for design base shear calculations. Based on the encountered soil conditions, it is our opinion soil profile type SD, Stiff Soil as defined in Table 16-J should be used to characterize the site. Excavations and Slopes In no case should excavation slopes be greater than the limits specified in local, state and Federal safety regulations. Based on the information obtained from our field exploration and laboratory testing, the site soils expected to be encountered in excavations would be classified as Type C by OSHA, and as such, temporary cuts greater than four feet in height should be sloped at an inclination no steeper than 1 .5H:1V. If slopes of this inclination, or flatter, cannot be constructed, temporary shoring may be necessary. This shoring will help protect against slope or excavation collapse, and will provide protection to workers in the excavation. If temporary shoring is required, we will be available to provide shoring design criteria, if requested. Permanent cut and fill slopes should be inclined no greater than 2H:1V. The above information has been provided solely as a service to our client. Under no circumstances should the above information be interpreted to mean that ECI is assuming responsibility for construction site safety or the contractor's activities; such responsibility is not being implied and should not be inferred. Earth Consultants, Inc. A & D Quality Construction ,.umpany E-8307 • July 6, 1998 Page 9 Site Drainage Groundwater seepage was not encountered in the test pit excavations, therefore, it does not appear groundwater will present construction related issues while excavating for foundations or utilities. However, if groundwater seepage is encountered during construction, the bottom of the excavation should be sloped to one or more shallow sump pits. The collected water can then be pumped from these pits to a positive and permanent discharge, such as a nearby storm drain. Depending on the magnitude of such seepage, it may also be necessary to interconnect the sump pits by a system of connector trenches. The appropriate locations of subsurface drains, if needed, should be established during grading operations by ECI's representative at which time the seepage areas, if present, may be more clearly defined. The site should be graded such that surface water is directed off the site. Water must not be allowed to stand in areas where foundations or slabs are to be constructed. During construction, loose surfaces should be sealed at night by compacting the surface to reduce the potential for moisture infiltration into the soils. Final site grades should allow for drainage away from the buildings. The ground should be sloped at a gradient of three percent for a distance of at least ten feet away from the buildings, except in paved areas, which can be sloped at a gradient of one percent. Footing drains should be installed around the building perimeters, at or just below the invert of the footings, with a gradient sufficient to initiate flow. Under no circumstances should roof downspout drain lines be connected to the footing drain systems. All roof downspouts must be separately tightlined to discharge. Cleanouts should be installed at several accessible locations for the periodic maintenance of the footing drain and downspout tightline systems. A typical detail is provided on Plate 3. Pavement Areas The adequacy of site pavements is related in part to the condition of the underlying subgrade. To provide a properly prepared subgrade for pavements, the subgrade should be treated and prepared as described in the Site Preparation and General Earthwork section of this report. This means at least the top twelve (12) inches of the subgrade should be compacted to 95 percent of the maximum dry density (per ASTM D-1 557-91 ). It is possible that some localized areas of soft, wet or unstable subgrade may still exist after this process. Therefore, a greater thickness of structural fill or crushed rock may be needed to stabilize these localized areas. Earth Consultants, Inc. •r A & D Quality Constructior. —Jmpany E-8307 July 6, 1998 Page 10 The following pavement section for driveway and parking areas can be used: • Two inches of asphalt concrete (AC) over four inches of crushed rock base (CRB) material, or • Two inches of AC over three inches of asphalt treated base (ATB) material. All pavement materials should conform to WSDOT specifications. In our opinion, a Class B asphalt mix should be used. Utility Support and Backfill Based on the soil conditions encountered, the soils expected to be exposed by utility excavations should provide adequate support for utilities. Utility trench backfill is a primary concern in reducing the potential for settlement along utility alignments, particularly in pavement areas. It is important that each section of utility line be adequately supported in the bedding material. The material should be hand tamped to ensure support is provided around the pipe haunches. Fill should be carefully placed and hand tamped to about twelve inches above the crown of the pipe before heavy compaction equipment is brought into use. The remainder of the trench backfill should be placed in lifts having a loose thickness of less than twelve inches. A typical trench backfill section and compaction requirements for load supporting and non-load supporting areas is presented on Plate 4. LIMITATIONS Our recommendations and conclusions are based on the site materials observed, selective laboratory testing and engineering analyses, the design information provided to us by the client, and our experience and engineering judgement. The conclusions and recommendations are professional opinions derived in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by other members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions in this area. No warranty is expressed or implied. The recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the test pits. Soil and groundwater conditions between test pits may vary from those encountered. The nature and extent of variations between our exploratory locations may not become evident until construction. If variations do appear, ECI should be requested to reevaluate the recommendations of this report and to modify or verify them in writing prior to proceeding with the construction. Earth Consultants, Inc. A & D Quality Construction ...,mpany E-8307 July 6, 1998 Page 11 Additional Services As the geotechnical engineer of record, ECI should be retained to perform a general review of the final design and specifications to verify the earthwork and foundation recommendations have been properly interpreted and implemented in the design and in the construction specifications. ECI should also be retained to provide geotechnical services during construction. This is to observe compliance with the design concepts, specifications or recommendations and to allow design changes in the event subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated prior to the start of construction. We do not accept responsibility for the performance of the foundation or earthwork unless we are retained to review the construction drawings and specifications, and to provide construction observation and testing services. Earth Consultants, Inc. t s ' x f .^ .,.'rp- 4- C r.4 t t`:' r irt.01 f 1 ft, i NC u• flee^ < �»-; a t ir�- 3I'-� ; t { .iCi ‘4L- r. 'f AU'14AS'ti I `NP ' Hi� �' t i ik: `4nE /. CMG "L" j 14F 5iitd�k R a y. ,ti y. , thus .it ! 3, Nairn ,x • a 7 .KI+ i.�11...... `'., tolteSOP gimpnkf xti t!Tr tem ` # N d rt '4 F �� ��j�.4_ )4,Ihf4S T P"� NE i 1�JLb /�` +' >t;. cz.t t ' .,tr.,,, ,� ,yr ... t w \f1L1!R; _A:41 t _1 �t --.. Ai' t- -CT° '''- kit .a SITE• r,� ( k NEB 13* .,., 41# -ICI). 1,- i ; i Cal R}} fit, s'* '.. poik �� bfMLItR1' k ip tiNe.,.... iH iA p q !�` j ( ��n e j� � trr tzR ' } � ' 1 r"'" R.vCV: . -"f r- Aa`r r ,yaq a v; A t* r~ ° CEDAR RIVER `Sc 41 MY, 415 4 t viar' . a ly�iFJUiIC 0 - �i ...,.=..i.Ft •--`i moo. }} 5 µv ! X�` 4 ` r,Ai ISM * , ,,� fill€Tom' rAs 4A \� . s= a�1 ? w np S 4l!M 7 ST '� Yc R t T '�IJ .. .11 `,,�� "' .. ,,� Y 1.' it .1 ,n1 u�+ r. ,s: , ''� SF t; �i F `r.M .y k x .St.. 1 + ` ,L. Fk1 j I/� tlidiii)((f; 11di `�� Earth Consultants, Inc. Geotechnical Engineers.Geologists&Environmental Scientists Reference: Vicinity Map King County/Map 656 3rd Street Apartment By Thomas Brothers Maps Renton, Washington Dated 1998 g Drwn. GLS Date June '98 Proj. No. 8307 Checked MGM Date 6/17/98 Plate 1 W. Existing Apartment Complex - ---- -- - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - -, I I F.F.=318.87 I F.F.=317.63 1 TP-4 I TP-3 � • I I -.- I I I I ITP-8 i I -0- - Existing I I Apartment I Complex I ! TP-9 I, ❑ I I Dempster Enclosure ITP-2 I T P-5 • TP-7 1 -Mr F.F.=317.47 I TP-1 I / ITP-6 Existing / Hydrant _16.15— Approximate Scale 3 S N -* C� 0 20 40 80ft. LEGEND ,i,. E�ti: ,��►, my)/ ;-4�1 l) Earth Consultants, Inc. Geotechnical Engineers.Geologists&Environmental Scientists —!— Approximate Location of ECI Test Pit, Proj. No. E-8307, June 1998 Test Pit Location Plan 3rd Street Apartments Proposed Building Renton, Washington •�• Proposed 3' High Berm Drwn. GLS - Date June '98 Proj. No. 8307 Checked MGM Date 6/17/98 Plate 2 • • Ia.Q\ o a Slope To Drain b ; ' .a N ...�^a..'A•..I.. ...,l y.Y.▪ /'.j» dT aw yJ... • '`a.KyA.��... O ..:✓ek.yyiL+ !i:i:,i�:l4�\Say.i•4,.. .�> •.`e.•• .i:: ..auz a 'i+.s•.'..;:r'-..F;� :iiiii. .^ �as�`•�5[2 '0 0 0 • 6 inch min. - ==: ' --;:z- s.•:_ ..,:a.: o - • ! O) .t 'ice.O•o.�L •e• �.-.r. ° °°�:° O O .o -'e•o,' 'o' +�.'o• 'oe4''• •••.e• •�..• 6 .' ° °• 18 inch min. .� o•.o• .. - - •• a' o • �. e °4 inch min. !'�' •• ` '•. •"'�.- -':- . o o_ Diameter • - Perforated Pipe---- • '• o• :a_•' •°_ . ° ., o Wrapped in Drainage _ �•- •O. G • ` 0 °0 o °0 Fabric 2 inch min. 2 inch min. / 4 inch max. 12 inch min. SCHEMATIC ONLY - NOT TO SCALE NOT A CONSTRUCTION DRAWING LEGEND Surface seal; native soil or other low permeability material. o•" Fine aggregate for Portland Cement Concrete; Section 9-03.1(2) of the °• WSDOT Specifications. ODrain pipe; perforated or slotted rigid PVC pipe laid with perforations or slots facing down;tight jointed; with a positive gradient. Do not use flexible corrugated plastic pipe. Do not tie building downspout drains into footing lines. Wrap with Mirafi 140 Filter Fabric or equivalent. . 4 TYPICAL FOOTING SUBDRAIN DETAIL Earth Consultants Inc. 3`d Street Apartments 1/ ‘I I i' Geoiecnnical Engli'ccrs.GeoogIsts&En 1 onnienlal Scx•nii.Ls Renton, Washington Proj. No. 8307 I Drwn. GLS Date June '98 Checked MGM I Date 6/25/98 I Plate 3 Non-Load Supporting Floor Slab or Areas - f . Roadway Areas _ 1 o ° ° �I ° Varies o °oo°o a 0 o 0 9 5 0 0 •o 85�~ A F 95 1 Foot Minimum r • Backfill <, 80 `N , 90 Varies R • I ✓o. ,,�.0. . PIPE 0 :. 0.:0' o °OOQ• 4v . /b.e°.A p.•.o BeddingQ.;o.o°.0e: ° 20Q;.o01p�.0.0.0 -� ••'a •o o.°.0 Varies o.'•.00' oa. 00 ( O �00•' o • Q •pO.O..00O. • °O• o•• Qood•C o 6 �8..• O• /�� o• O'D QO' • O Oo a�O', O. .00o4•6av-°;0 goo LEGEND: 7r3•741W1 Asphalt or Concrete Pavement or Concrete Floor Slab o °• 0 OQ°•4 e o °°o •• Base Material or Base Rock 0,. . . n Backfill; Compacted On-Site Soil or Imported Select Fill Material as Described in the Site Preparation of the General . Earthwork Section of the Attached Report Text. 95 Minimum Percentage of Maximum Laboratory Dry Density as Determined by ASTM Test Method D 1557-78 (Modified Proctor), Unless Otherwise Specified in the Attached Report Text. ...oe��k.: Bedding Material; Material Type Depends on Type of Pipe and °0.0:oa;0• Laying Conditions. Bedding Should Conform to the Manufacturers • ... Recommendations for the Type of Pipe Selected. ./iti •i». q*� TYPICAL UTILITY TRENCH FILL �� Earth Consultants Inc. rd Street Apartments 1114/ ` C-,erxrchnical Enµineers.Geologists&Fnvirmmenral SO 1)I s's Renton, Washington Proj. No. 8307 I Drwn. GLS I Date June '98 Checked MGM Date 6/25/98 1 Plate 4 l APPENDIX A FIELD EXPLORATION E-8307 Our subsurface exploration was performed on June 10, 1998. The subsurface conditions at the site were explored by excavating nine test pits to a maximum depth of thirteen and one-half (13.5) feet below existing grade. The test pits were excavated by a rubber-tire backhoe provided by the client. Approximate test pit locations were determined by pacing from features as shown on the site map provided by the A & D Quality Construction Company. Test pit elevations were determined relative to each other. The locations and elevations of the test pits should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. These approximate locations are shown on the Test Pit Location Plan, Plate 2. The field exploration was continuously monitored by a geologist from our firm who classified the soils encountered, maintained a log of each test pit, obtained representative samples, and observed pertinent site features. All samples were visually classified in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System which is presented on Plate Al , Legend. Logs of the test pits are presented on Plates A2 through A10. The final logs represent our interpretation of the field logs and the results of the laboratory examination and tests of field samples. The stratification lines on the logs represent the approximate boundaries between soil types. In actuality, the transitions may be more gradual. Representative soil samples were placed in closed containers and returned to our laboratory for further examination and testing. Earth Consultants, Inc. MAJOR DIVISIONS GRAPH LETTER TYPICAL DESCRIPTION SYMBOL SYMBOL GW Well-Graded Gravels, Gravel-Sand Gravel And Clean Gravels O o o e AQndn gw Mixtures, Little Or No Fines Gravelly (little or no fines) r r Coarse Soils , • e GP Poorly-Graded Gravels,Gravel gp Sand Mixtures, Little Or No Fines Grained Soils More Than GM r Silty Gravels,Gravel-Sand- 50% Coarse Gravels With gM Silt Mixtures lib Fraction Fines(appreciable Retained On amount of fines) GC Clayey Gravels, Gravel Sand No. 4 Sieve illi gc Clay Mixtures Sand •. 00 0 SW Well-Graded Sands, Gravelly And Clean Sand c 0'o o SW Sands, Little Or No Fines Sandy (little or no fines) :1 :.! .::... SP Poorly-Graded Sands, Gravelly More Than Soils Q wio Q::::wi 50% Material » lf;: ;:;;...:*0 Sp Sands, Little Or No Fines Larger Than More Than No.200 Sieve 50% Coarse SM Silty Sands, Sand- Silt Mixtures Size Sands With SM Fraction Fines(appreciable Passing No.4 amount of fines) �';� SC SC Sieve :'::::' :: ) Clayey Sands, Sand Clay Mixtures .:: ML Inorganic Silts&Very Fine Sands,Rock Flour,Silty- rnl Clayey Fine Sands;Clayey Silts w/ Slight Plasticity Fine Silts Liquid Limit Inorganic Clays Of Low To Medium Plasticity, Grained And Less Than 50 ��/ CL CI Gravelly Clays, Sandy Clays, Silty Clays, Lean Soils Clays I 1 I I OL Organic Silts And Organic I I I I I I I OI Silty Clays Of Low Plasticity MH Inorganic Silts, Micaceous Or Diatomaceous Fine More Than mh Sand Or Silty Soils 50% Material Silts Smaller Than And Liquid Limit 'CH Inorganic Clays Of High No.200 Sieve Clays Greater Than 50 Ch Plasticity, Fat Clays. Size //// OF,..._____ ---------: Organic Clays Of Medium To High l lOh Plasticity, Organic Silts `'�' `�l PT Peat, Humus, Swamp Soils Highly Organic Soils L ``, `,r `,, pt With High Organic Contents Topsoil y''y y J Humus And Duff Layer Fill •�•�•••••�• Highly Variable Constituents The discussion in the text of this report is necessary for a proper understanding of the nature of the material presented in the attached logs. DUAL SYMBOLS are used to Indicate borderline soil classification. C TORVANE READING,tsf I 2"O.D. SPLIT SPOON SAMPLER qu PENETROMETER READING,tsf W MOISTURE, %dry weight ll 24`I.D. RING OR SHELBY TUBE SAMPLER P SAMPLER PUSHED * SAMPLE NOT RECOVERED i WATER OBSERVATION WELL pcf DRY DENSITY, lbs. per cubic ft. LL LIQUID LIMIT, % 4 DEPTH OF ENCOUNTERED GROUNDWATER PI PLASTIC INDEX DURING EXCAVATION Y SUBSEQUENT GROUNDWATER LEVEL W/DATE "E �"` 1 J I Earth Consultants Inc. LEGEND 'II ' \ / CW01(1 NM all El1g1111'1'IS,(NZ,iugiSIS&IJ Iris N111N.111.II SCIrl)11S1] Proj. No. 8307 I Date June'98 I Plate Al Test Pit Log Project Name: Sheet of 3rd Street Apartments 1 1 Job No. Logged by: Date: Test Pit No.: 8307 MGM 6/10/98 TP-1 Excavation Contactor: Ground Surface Elevation: A&D Quality Const. Notes: w o --I Surface Conditions: Depth of Topsoil & Duff 3" CL U (%) Q G ro c Co • SM FILL: Dark brown silty SAND, loose, moist 20.0 •.�.:.�.e� ::�::: 2 SM FILL: Gray silty SAND, loose, moist 3 -contains abundant bottles, charcoal wood 37.2 4 -25% fines 5 ♦♦ ♦♦ 7 8 29.1 9 -still contains abundant bottles, metal parts SP-SM FILL: Brown poorly graded SAND with silt, loose, moist • 11 -contact dipping to south SP-S Brown poorly graded SAND with silt, medium dense, moist o_ ', ° 12 ° 13 10.9 o vlr Test pit terminated at 13.5 feet below existing grade. No groundwater encountered during excavation. co rn N a, jUt\ A Test Pit Log o ` `41 Earth Consultants InC. 3rd Street Apartments 1-41 'i/ ff\, )i Geotechn"al Engineers,Geolo e.Environmental Sce"'is'z Renton, Washington Proj. No. 8307 Dwn. GLS Date June '98 Checked MGM Date 6/18/98 Plate A2 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole, modified by engineering tests,analysis and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of information presented on this log. Test Pit Log Project Name: Sheet of 3rd Street Apartments 1 1 Job No. Logged by: Date: Test Pit No.: 8307 MGM 6/10/98 TP-2 Excavation Contactor. ' Ground Surface Elevation: A&D Quality Const. Notes: vv o 4 o Surface Conditions: Depth of Topsoil &Grass 5" a, U (%) Rs 5, Q k+ ro m CO uz SM FILL: Gray silty SAND, loose, moist 31.5 1 -charcoal wood and bottles 2 SM Reddish brown silty fine SAND, loose, moist 9.0 -trace gravel (weathered to approximately 3' below grade) 3 -becomes brown, medium dense 4 5 6 V° SP Brown poorly graded SAND with gravel, medium dense, moist o ,• o $ oco a° • o o 9 -trace cobbles 10 -1%fines 4.4 • ° Test pit terminated at 10.5 feet below existing grade. No groundwater encountered during excavation. oo • N rj a, . -Otit Test Pit Log o ■■`■'11'+ 11, Earth Consultants Inc. 3rd Street Apartments \�..1�( / Geo echr k l Engti Icc n.Geologists&Environrtiental Scientists co �N Renton, Washington Proj. No. 8307 Dwn. GLS Date June '98 Checked MGM Date 6/18/98 Plate A3 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of information presented on this log. Test Pit Log Project Name: Sheet of 3rd Street Apartments 1 1 Job No. • Logged by: Date: Test Pit No.: 8307 MGM 6/10/98 TP-3 Excavation Contactor: Ground Surface Elevation: A&D Quality Const. Notes: w .• oH o Surface Conditions: Depth of Topsoil & Duff 4" a 'en) (%) ro a) �' ro r� v2 m SM FILL: Brown and gray silty SAND, loose, moist -distinct fill contact dipping steeply to west at approximately 50 degrees 2 SP-S -west side of pit, fill approximately 5'thick on west end of pit /— o Brown poorly graded SAND with silt, loose to medium dense, moist 3 -9%fines 0 7.1 • SP-SM Grades to poorly graded SAND with silt and gravel, medium dense, o a moist 2.1 ° o 5 0 o,° 6 0 0 r ° O 7 , •o • 8 � o O 0 0 o 9 r ° o .. Test pit terminated at 9.5 feet below existing grade. No groundwater encountered during excavation. CO N h w 44 Test Pit Log (11'0 `r t Earth Consultants Inc. 3rd Street Apartments ` Geoletlmkal EnC��� Engineers,GeobgFsts&Environmental ScYrniLSis Renton, Washington F Proj. No. 8307 Dwn. GLS Date June'98 Checked MGM Date 6/18/98 Plate A4 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole, modified by engineering tests,analysis and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of information presented on this log. Test Pit Log Project Name: Sheet of 3rd Street Apartments 1 1 Job No. Logged by: Date: Test Pit No.: 8307 MGM 6/10/98 TP-4 Excavation Contactor: Ground Surface Elevation: A&D Quality Const. Notes: w o 4 0 Surface Conditions: 4"of Vegetation on 4" of Topsoil CL U (%) '° w ro rn rn Cl) SP-SM FILL: Brown poorly graded SAND with silt, loose, moist . 7.6 2 3 — -trace concrete -tire at 3.5' ° 4 SP Brown poorly graded SAND with gravel, medium dense, moist ° n s a • o a 6 2.0 r , 0 7 „ OQ • o c° 8 — o';Qo 7.z .9 Test pit terminated at 9.0 feet below existing grade. No groundwater encountered during excavation. N h a p 411 Test Pit Log o �� td J O Earth Consultants Inc. 3rd Street Apartments M 1 1 \fir Geokdmkal Engineers.Geolo a Environmental Scientists CORenton, Washington a H Proj.No. 8307 Dwn. GLS Date June'98 Checked MGM Date 6/18/98 Plate A5 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of information presented on this log. Test Pit Log Project Name: Sheet of 3rd Street Apartments 1 1 Job No. Logged by: Date: Test Pit No.: 8307 MGM 6/10/98 TP-5 Excavation Contactor: Ground Surface Elevation: A&D Quality Const. Notes: W • o o Surface Conditions: Depth of Topsoil & Duff 8" lac-9 a-1JLL U (%) Q r ro • rn Cl) rn ♦♦♦ SM i FILL: Gray and brown silty SAND with gravel, loose, moist ♦♦♦♦♦ 1 2 ♦♦♦♦♦♦ 3 — �♦�♦� -contains bottles and metal debris ♦�♦�♦� a 34.0 5 ♦�♦�♦� 6 ♦♦ 7 ♦♦♦♦♦♦ :♦♦♦♦ 9 SP-SM Brown poorly graded SAND with silt, loose to medium dense, moist o .' • ' 10 5.0 , o • 11 Test pit terminated at 11.0 feet below existing grade. No groundwater encountered during excavation. o a, L lA� 44 Test Pit Log (`Ili r--0 1.� Earth Consultants Inc. 3rd Street Apartments M tl 6 Geo,echni al E tr eem.GeOb8iSt5&FitvinonmttM81 SclentiSts CO Renton, Washington Proj.No. 8307 Dwn. GLS Date June '98 Checked MGM Date 6/18/98 Plate A6 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole, modified by engineering tests,analysis and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of information presented on this log. .t Test Pit Log Project Name: Sheet of 3rd Street Apartments 1 1 • Job No. Logged by: Date: Test Pit No.: 8307 MGM 6/10/98 TP-6 Excavation Contactor: Ground Surface Elevation: A&D Quality Const. Notes: W o —I Surface Conditions: Depth of Topsoil & Duff 5" ca—uGL U (%) `° Q N.4 rt rn rn Cl) SM FILL: Gray and brown silty SAND, loose, moist 2 -contains glass and metal debris -fill contact dipping to east 20.5 4 SP-SM Brown poorly graded SAND with silt, loose, moist • 5 -caving 7.1 , • 6 SP Brown poorly graded SAND with gravel, medium dense, moist 0 o 0 ° -cobbles 8 > o 4.3 ' °a ° 9 Test pit terminated at 9.0 feet below existing grade. No groundwater encountered during excavation. co rn N h . i Al Test Pit Log o � Earth Consultants Inc. 3rd Street Apartments M (1114/ `OldtUtcIIl GYka Fsgneers. l t GeobgFsts 6 FSNronmen en tal Scitistsm Renton, Washington H Proj. No. 8307 Dwn. GLS Date June '98 Checked MGM Date 6/18/98 Plate A7 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of information presented on this log. L. Test Pit Log • Project Name: Sheet of 3rd Street Apartments 1 1 _ Job No. Logged by: Date: Test Pit No.: 8307 MGM , 6/10/98 TP-7 Excavation Contactor: Ground Surface Elevation: A&D Quality Const. Notes: w o4. o Surface Conditions: Depth of Topsoil & Duff 8" Q U (%) (CS Q G-' al (5 rn Cl) CO SM FILL: Brown silty SAND with gravel, loose, moist "44 1 SM FILL: Gray silty SAND with gravel, loose, moist 2 3 -contains abundant glass bottles 17.1 ����� -metal and wood debris 4 5 SP-SM FILL: Brown poorly graded SAND with silt and gravel, loose, moist 7 -caving $ -10% fines 10.2 i�i 9 SP-SM Brown poorly graded SAND with silt and gravel, medium dense, moist i;:0: 3.6 °'0 10 Test pit terminated at 10.5 feet below existing grade. No groundwater encountered during excavation. • 00 0, N h w 0 ~ -AV 441% Test Pit Log`4 Earth Consultants Inc. 3rd Street Apartments mo II/(104 Geofechni al Engineers.Geologistsro a E7rvinrnental Scientists Renton, Washington a H Proj. No. 8307 Dwn. GLS Date June '98 Checked MGM Date 6/18/98 Plate A8 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of information presented on this log. Test Pit Log Project Name: Sheet of 3rd Street Apartments 1 1 1 Job No. Logged by: Date: Test Pit No.: 8307 MGM 6/10/98 TP-8 • Excavation Contactor: Ground Surface Elevation: A&D Quality Const. Notes: w o Surface Conditions: 5" of Weeds &Topsoil L2 U (%) m QE., at, C7 uZ SM FILL: Gray and brown silty SAND, loose, moist - -glass and metal debris •0 2 SP-SM Brown poorly graded SAND with silt, medium dense, moist O 0 'o 3 o' • 0 ° 4 Test pit terminated at 4.0 feet below existing grade. No groundwater encountered during excavation. CO • a, h W /O .E Test Pit Log Earth Consultants Inc. 3rd Street Apartments I�l Il#�ir� ��,e m.Geologists&Environmental Scientists Renton, Washington Proj. No. 8307 Dwn. GLS Date June '98 Checked MGM Date 6/18/98 Plate A9 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole, modified by engineering tests,analysis and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of information presented on this log. L Test Pit Log Project Name: Sheet of 3rd Street Apartments 1 1 Job No. Logged by: Date: Test Pit No.: 8307 MGM 6/10/98 TP-9 Excavation Contactor. Ground Surface Elevation: A&D Quality Const. Notes: w o 4 o Surface Conditions: 4"of Topsoil LL U (%) �' ro U U m • SM FILL: Brown and gray silty SAND, loose, moist 2 -abundant glass bottles 34.9 ♦♦ 4 ♦♦ 7 8 • 9 SP-SM Brown poorly graded SAND with silt, medium dense, moist 0. 10 o; » -trace gravel 6.6 'o 12 • Test pit terminated at 12.0 feet below existing grade. No groundwater encountered during excavation. N t` LL t' u!t Test Pit Log kill Earth Consultants Inc. 1i'1, 1 ill 3rd Street Apartments m � G..Ac�.lttfld FTgtrieets.Ceob�stt 6 EnNta"neiMal SC1entLslS Renton, Washington a H Proj. No. 8307 Dwn. GLS Date June'98 Checked MGM Date 6/18/98 Plate A10 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of information presented on this log. APPENDIX B LABORATORY TEST RESULTS E-8307 Earth Consultants, Inc. • r SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER ANALYSIS SIZE OF OPENING IN INCHES 1 NUMBER OF MESH PER INCH, U.S.STANDARD GRAIN SIZE IN MM W tD 8 cl N i-- O O tD d Cl N O O Q O O N.�- .Q oo m O tD O O op O O O O O O 0 O O O O. O. O O. O.z N tD d u N .- _cv _ d 00.- N 0 '�t 0 CO CO N 0 O /�l 100 -_s�� �ul�asI�__l• ij - 90 Ili• H m M 20 L1* m 80 _i�•IMMVIIIMh>wr m D n- C� "�� ill 30 n JO 0 r m70 r • m n n • -I \�� 40 z -T1 60 01...a.....— • C n W■►� ; C R. X 'i!��M�� ��mmommummiminelaRMIIM _ 50 > o W 50 *&�� m -C ��\.1 m G ' U7 40 `U_�� 60 DJ W vma (D m t� r q, 7. • 1 30 M�. 70 f • = m C • I 20 �l 80 --I Co ���11 7- CD. � 111ftr so to s\ 1 7:1 II m a 0 o II Mall EMI IMI MI ��IUUUI -� .4.---! 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO co v CO N lD v ? N CO 0 0 0 0 0 CO 0 0 CO o O ray Fr m D 0 N0 0 CO WI V CO N r- • 0 O 0 0 0 O M N - GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS LI) O 2 COARSE ' FINE COARSE I MEDIUM I FINE FINES CD O W COBBLES GRAVEL SAND rt N O P m cri , j Moisture co ~• Z KEY Boring or DEPTH USCS DESCRIPTION Content (%) LL PL n Test Pit No. (ft.) D e m w 37 .2 ,_� rt c TP-1 4 SM Gray silty SAND with gravel -- -- -o m a--- TP-2 10 SP Brown poorly graded SAND with gravel 4.4 -- -- CD F- ........ TP-3 3 SP-SM Brown poorly graded SAND with silt 7 .1 -- -- •_•-- TP-7 8 SP-SM Brown poorly graded SAND with silt and gravel 10.2 -- -- DISTRIBUTION E-8307 5 Copies A & D Quality Construction Company P.O. Box 2552 Renton, Washington 98056 Attention: Ms. Annette Demps Earth Consultants, Inc. or.svo_om 71.1TPLIV:r:; 4t3 CITY OF REM i G,.1 JUL 14 1998 RECEIVED MEMORANDUM E- a9 DATE: 4// /°I TO: Construction Services, Fire Prevention, Plan Review, Project Planner FROM: Jim Hanson, Development Services Division Director SUBJECT: New Preliminary Application: C/1447C /e pmC�: LOCATION: ( X/ /\i 3 . S A meeting with the applicant has been scheduled for // :000 , Thursday, A-p--►-i I //9141.- in the 3rd floor conference room. If this meeting is scheduled at 10:00 AM, the MEETING MUST BE CONCLUDED PRIOR TO 11:00 AM to allow time to prepare for the 11 :00 meeting. Please review the attached project plans prior to the scheduled meeting with the applicant. You will not need to do a thorough "permit level" review at this time. Note only major issues that must be resolved prior to formal land use and/or building permit application submittal. If you are unable to attend the meeting, please send a representative. Please submit your written comments to /r/ i-- at least two (2) days before the meeting. Thank you. %‘47 s�� . 4,ENTON FIRE DEPT `'IRE PRE\FNTION RIJRFAI' APR 0 1998 RED MEMORANDUM 9g-2-I DATE: '`t/t /°I TO: Construction Services, Fire Prevention, Plan Review, Project Planner FROM: Jim Hanson, Development Services Division Director SUBJECT: New Preliminary Application: 0/2eVV I le S P cc LOCATION: (9- %, NE' aY2 . S A meeting with the applicant has been scheduled for /1 : ©L0 , Thursday, in the 3rd floor conference room. If this meeting is scheduled at 10:00 AM, the MEETING MUST BE CONCLUDED PRIOR TO 11:00 AM to allow time to prepare for the 11 :00 meeting. Please review the attached project plans prior to the scheduled meeting with the applicant. You will not need to do a thorough "permit level" review at this time. Note only major issues that must be resolved prior to formal land use and/or building permit application submittal. If you are unable to attend the meeting, please send a representative. nn Please submit your written comments to at least two (2) days before the meeting. Thank you. Vc;Le- ect't""'#4/1 ‘/W/ ,� � !' /s- TY ® , CITY OF RENTON r Nr FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU MEMORANDUM DATE: April 6, 1998 TO: Mark Pywell, Planner FROM: Jim Gray, Assistant Fire Marshal *- SUBJECT: Cherell's Place, 2800 Blk. NE 3rd St. Fire Department Comments: 1. The preliminary Fire flow is 2250 GPM which requires one fire hydrant • within 150 feet of the building and two additional hydrants within 300 feet of the each building. 2. Separate plans and permits are required for the required sprinkler and fire alarm system installations. 3. Provide a list of any flammable, combustible liquids or hazardous chemicals that are to be used or stored on site. 4. A fire mitigation fee of $6,984.00 is required based on $388.00 per unit. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Glr� MEMORANDUM ci 2;19 DATE: 4// TO: Construction Services, Fire Prevention, Plan Review, Project Planner FROM: Jim Hanson, Development Services Division Director SUBJECT: New Preliminary Application: 2i vv/ ie S PMcc LOCATION: (?-e4Xx -3Y A meeting with the applicant has been scheduled for // 1DC7 , Thursday, / /f/i4t- in the 3rd floor conference room. If this meeting is scheduled at 10:00 AM, the MEETING MUST BE CONCLUDED PRIOR TO 11:00 AM to allow time to prepare for the 11 :00 meeting. Please review the attached project plans prior to the scheduled meeting with the applicant. You will not need to do a thorough "permit level" review at this time. Note only major issues that must be resolved prior to formal land use and/or building permit application submittal. If you are unable to attend the meeting, please send a representative. n Please submit your written comments to /r� - at least two (2) days before the meeting. Thank you. 9/pg Cirrfrs 1A2 e-, s Ca., V.. cGred- CHEVELLE'S PLACE 2800 BLK. OF NE 3rd Street Pre-Application Development Services April 16, 1998 11:00 AM 1. There is a System Development Connection charge of$5 10 per unit. 2. One(1) fire hydrant is required for each 1000 gpm of required fire flow. The primary hydrant is to be within 150-feet of the building, but not closer than 50-feet and secondary hydrants are to be within 300 feet of the building. 3. A loop water line is required for fire flow above 2500 gpm.,,The Fire Department determines the required fire flow. �••"� 4. The project is located just outside the aquifer protection zone#2. p�. 5. The proposed site is located in the Highlands 435 water pressure zone. � ,cr, r, 4.35 X .3 ` ( i"((gut,"trrrl�r it (,.r 6. A 16-inch water main is available on NE 3rd St. . c-c+'i c. \J +=$ ) 7. A composite utility plan would be required. Submittal to include main locations, sizes, valve locations and hydrant locations. 8. City of Renton Standard drawing details are available at the forth floor counter for plans detail sheet. City drafting standards are also available at the fourth floor counter. I I-.4. (yC L {b: K cock,. -- SEWER: (Waste Water) 1. The System Development Connection charge is $350 per unit. . 2. Side sewer to have a minimum slope of 2%to right-of-way line. 3.. Minimum pipe size is 6-inches. 4. A 24-inch line is available in NE 3rd St. An 8-inch line at the North property line. 5. If any fats, oils, or grease are produced then an appropriate removal system will be required. 6. The site is located on the NW 16-23-5 quarter section map. 7. Provide a surface cleanout 5-feet in front of building and show invert elevations. STORM(Surface Water) 1. System Development Connection charge is $0.129 per square foot of new impervious surface area, (but not less than$385). 98CM066.DOC\ 2. Surface water control must meet or exceed the requirements of the King County Surface Water Design Manual requirements. Use 1990 Design Manual. A level 1 Drainage Report is required. An additional report level analysis may be required. Indication how any applicable_ Core Requirements or Special Requirements would be addressed. See attachment for content requirements of a Conceptual Drainage Report. In particular Special Requirement #5, core requirement#2 and#4 to be addressed. 3. Base map must use the NAVD 1988 datum. 4. The topography of the entire site and minimum of 30-feet outside the property is required to be shown on the plans. 5. Runoff collected from pavement or gravel surface with vehicle access/parking must flow through an oil/water separator CB or adequate biofiltration system. 6. Provide Erosion/Sedimentation Control Plans. 7. Parking areas or driving surfaces subject to vehicular use of greater than 5,000 square feet are required to discharge into a biofiltration system or water quality control system. TRANSPORTATION: 1. Mitigation fee for transportation is $75 per new trip generated. Trip generation is determined by the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 5th edition. Trip rate is 6.47 trips per unit: Therefore: $75 (18 x 6.47) _$8,734.50 Mitigation cost 2. All electrical and communications facilities for the project to be underground. 3. Required off-site improvements is as follows: Street Lighting. One(1) street light standards and luminaries to City Standards. Uniformity ratio not to exceed 4:1 and a minimum of 2-ft.-c. on NE 3rd St. This will require a 250 watt sodium vapor luminaire mounted on a 40-ft. Pole located near the westerly property line. The existing old luminaire to be removed by Puget Sound Energy. 98cm066 c•� I C C>, C C 1 — A • (:o 2c; c-iC; C'C 98CM066.DOC\ CONTENT LIST FOR DRAINAGE REPORT FOR CONCEPTUAL DRAINAGE PLAN 1. Stamped and signed by a Washington Professional Civil Engineer on the front page. Complete Technical Information Report (TIR) Worksheet that is enclosed. 2. Briefly describe the construction involved. 3. Describe existing and proposed on-site drainage features: 4. Show that Core Requirements 1 through 5 from the King County Surface Water Manual (KCSWM) are addressed. 5. Show that all Special Requirements from the KCSWM that are applicable to the project are addressed. 6. Use the SBUH/SCS hydrograph method to compute required on-site detention. Use 2, 10, and 100 year 24 hour design storm events for pre-developed and post-developed conditions. this should show sizing for the peak rate runoff control (retention/detention) facility, with a routing table. 7. Biofiltration preliminary and conceptual design calculations, if the project site has 5000 square feet of new impervious area subject to vehicular use or storage of chemicals. 8. Wet pond sizing preliminary and conceptual design calculations if there is more than 1 acre of new paved impervious area and meets other conditions of Special Requirement #4. 9. A Level 1 Off-site Analysis, as described in Core Requirement #2. Level 2 or 3 analysis may be requested later if a downstream problem is found or anticipated from review of the initial submittal of the Drainage report. • .S 1/4 _. 5309 ; { NTON �.�,..�-�;,/;�� 1...._ Nib--, , .... �_ ...j: ( ` - TOARY S EWERS �' - CITY t � �� SANI I Ferndale f`// h 1 -- .-.�,--T---- .- 4t 5315 `316 531E316 LEGEND i _` ' i -.:__'.. : : : ' _19t...1oo—' i3�' TZT...._.� _� lz3 `. _.� r Mee SEWER LIES �'� r.._.— ..._.e.. .m-_. 1 1`§R1 --------..._.-.-24.-..-..-'''...--Dr .2103 12, 104 ----- PRIVATE SEWER LNES ,+., ql 30 .... 201 202 28_.: / /.." l l : .............._.......... i . a' o- ^' FOR MANS I :9B I .5_. t i : 29 1200 l/ .... Z4.91 •..-.. • MANOOLLNESE 1 n`G` J �•' 'S 2� y p" PRNATE MAN lv V j r,r' 15315 '17i 71 35 erg METRO MANHOLES 1385 2' 1J11 aca•. r'} M15 39• _Ul DRECTION ARROWS 24 LET STATIONS d„ • . 1 71 1'1 iJ y FLOW ch k, : RENTON OTY LIMITS ' 141 � 1, 1425 5315 t� 143 24• 5315 M 144 5315 145 • / 1 74 1 207 1 ; N ...Z. D1rit.ER: :315 2OS FRO RNUMER RY WfORYATION 15 S TH(NESTI ONLY. •T WAS[CURLED • FRO..NUYEROUS SOURCES. IT IS 1HE D FORATICN 146 204 15 AYA4.ABlE AT MS TYE AND SHOULD BE USED fdl GENERAL (]f GUIDANCE ONLY. THE CITY OE EN THIS IISR�O IONEIS UNSEOLFOR� 5315 206 ERRORS ON ESIGNS. S. 147 RR CG.DESIGNS.AND/OR CONSTRUCTION INFORU PURPOSES.USERSFR ARE O 76 TO FIELD VERIES THIS INFORMATION. 'n 96 gL p 400 800 77 r ::: 5315 __5316 5716 __ ..;;x...:,.. 1 NB 161 78 1:4800 5315 • 16 79 "' 160 5316 2....- 80 v'ti�- O UTILITY SYSTEMS 1 { 81• ♦ �i� ♦ P/B/PW TECHNICAL SERVICES j 5715 B2 `�■` 01/07/97 �� 1 6 7;� ��N-c0 5316 NW 1/4 CITY OF RENTON Planning / Building / Public Works MEMORANDUM DATE: April 16, 1998 • TO: Pre-Application File FROM: Mark R. Pywell, AICP SUBJECT: Cherelle's Place Pre-App 98-29 We have completed a preliminary review of the pre-application for the proposed development. The following comments on development and permitting issues are based on the pre-application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision makers (e.g., Hearing Examiner, Zoning Administrator, Board of Adjustment, Board of Public Works, and City Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by City staff or made by the applicant. The applicant is encouraged to review all applicable sections of the Renton Municipal Code. 1. The applicant seeks to develop a 18 unit apartment complex consisting of 3 buildings with 6 units per building. No elevations were provided but presumably the units will all be above ground making the structures 3 stories tall. 2. The project site is zoned RM-I (Residential Multi-Family Infill). The property on the North and East of the subject property is zoned RM-I. The property located on the East side of the subject property is zoned CA (Commercial Arterial). NE 3rd Street is located on the South side of the subject property and the property on the South side of the street is zoned R-10. 3. An administrative site plan and environmental review will be required for this project. It will take approximately six to eight weeks to complete the review once the project is accepted as complete. 4. The applicant will need to comply with the Development Standards of the RM-I zone. The density established for this zone is 10 to 20 dwelling units per net acre. Minimum front yard setback is 20 feet, minimum rear yard setback is 15 feet, minimum side yard setback is 12 feet due to the width of the lot. The maximum height limit is 35 feet or 2 1/2 stories. This means that the buildings will need to be /' \\1>i set into the ground 1/2 story or through the site plan review process the applicant will need to request .) the additional height. It is the applicant's responsibility to provide a reasonable explanation for the height/story increase. The maximum lot coverage is 35%. The applicant may request a public hearing before the Hearing / Examiner to obtain a 45% lot coverage maximum. Cherelle's Place Page 2 Pre-Application 98-29 April 16 1998 5. Parking is to be located on the side or rear portion of a lot. Parking needs to be provided at a ratio of 1.5 spaces per unit plus one guest parking space per four units. The guest parking spaces need to be accessible to guest. A total of 32 parking spaces need to be provided. If additional parking is to -. be provided or if fewer parking stalls are provided, the applicant will need to obtain a waiver from the .2, ; parking standards before the site plan can be approved. The parking layout is acceptable. A heavy -I screen of landscaping should be provided on the front yard of this site. 6. If known, the proposed sign should be shown on the site elan... A separate sign permit is required prior to the installation of the sign. 7. A Park Mitigation fee of$354.51 per unit will be required prior to the issuance of building permits. 8. The project is in the area influenced by the airport. A Notice of Proposed Construction will need to be submitted to the FAA and the review completed prior to the issuance of building permits for this project. The applicant is advised to submit the notice as soon as possible. If the ground elevation is above 179 feet, then the applicant may be required to record a covenant on the property 1 .S� ti acknowledging the existence of the airport and the fact that low flying aircraft will fly over this site at ��. all times of the day and night as they approach the airport. The applicant will need to show the tiv.% height.of the structures as feet above the ground level and as an elevation above sea level. 9829MMO.DOC CITY OF RENTON PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: April 3, 1998 TO: Mark Pywell 'jci FROM: Rebecca Lind STAFF CONTACT: Troy Schlepp (425)277-6167 SUBJECT: Cherelle's Place Preapplication -Long Range Planning Comments (28),:x block of NE 3rd St.) 1. Intent of the Comprehensive Plan land use designation The site is designated Residential Multifamily Infill (RM-I) in the Comprehensive Plan. The designation is intended to"encourage the development of infill parcels in existing multi-family districts with compatible projects"(Objective LU-L). The proposed multi-family use is appropriate to the designation. 2. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan The proposal appears to be consistent with the following RM-I policy. Policy LU-69. Residential Multi family Infill designations should not be expanded. Land within the districts should be used efficiently to meet multi family housing needs. 3. Areas of potential inconsistency with the Comprehensive Plan Policy LU-64. Development density should generally be in the range of 10-20 dwelling units per acre. The submitted materials show a density of about 20.21 units per net acre (see attached Density Worksheet). 4. Advisory Policy LU-65. New development in Residential Multi family Infill designations should be compatible in size, scale, bulk, use, and design with other existing multi family developments. Policy LU-66. Design standards should be applied that reflect present development patterns and are sensitive to unique features and differences among established neighborhoods. Standards should address, but not be limited to: 1) building height, width, and length; 2)front, side, and rear yard setbacks; 3) maximum lot coverage; 4) location of driveways, garages, and parking areas; 5) number of garages and off-site parking spaces; 6) roofline; and 7) compatibility with adjacent uses. Policy LU-67. Siting and design of new structures should be sensitive to site constraints and adjacent uses. Provision of adequate buffers or setbacks or scaling down building heights may be 4/3/98 Page 2 required to transition from Residential Multi family Injill designations to adjacent lower density uses. Policy LU-68. Adequate green spaces, recreation, design amenities, signing and lighting should be determined as part of the site planning process. Allowable densities should be based on meeting these objectives. Policy LU-78. Trees should be planted along residential streets. 4/3/98 City of Renton Density Worksheet for Development in the RM-I According to Renton's Comprehensive Plan, the policy for new development in the RM-I states that residential densities should generally be in the range of 10 to 20 dwelling units per acre (Policy LU-64). 1) Total parcel size: 38804.00 square feet 2) Net Acreage (line 1 divided by 43560): 0.89 acres 3) 38804.0Q sq ft and 18 dwelling units result in a density of 20.21 d.u./acre. AduE 776 0 Er-df-2 s Sirs zz —id/sly DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISIO WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS LAND USE PERMIT SUBMITTAL WAIVED MODIFIED COMMENTS: REQUIREMENTS: BY: BY: Calculations, Survey, Drainage Control Plan 2 Drainage Report 2 Elevations, Architectural AND 4 Elevations, Grading 2 Existing Covenants (Recorded Copy)a Existing Easements (Recorded Copy) 4 Flood Plain Map, if applicable 4 Floor Plans 3AND4 Geotechnical Report2AND3 Grading Plan, Conceptual 2 Grading Plan, Detailed 2 King County Assessor's Map Indicating Site Landscaping Plan, Conceptual4 Legal Description 4 List of Surrounding Property Owners 4 Mailing Labels for Property Owners 4 Map of Existing Site Conditions4 Master Application Form 4 Monument Cards (one per monument) i Parking, Lot Coverage & Landscaping Analysis 4 Plan Reductions (PMTs) 4 Postage 4 Public Works Approval Letter2 Title Report or Plat Certificate 4 Topography Map (5' contours)3 Traffic Study 2 J3 Tree Cutting/Vegetation Clearing Plano Utilities Plan, Generalized 2 Wetlands Delineation Map a �0 Wetlands Planting Plan 4 Wetlands Study 4 This requirement may be waived by: / 1. Property Services Section PROJECT NAME: /y e-" 2. Public Works Plan Review Section 3. Building Section DATE:_)wee,- /, 1,5'. 4. Development Planning Section h:\division.s\develop.ser\dev.plan.ing\waiver.xls **************************************************************** City of Renton WA Reprinted: 07/14/98 14 : 53 Receipt **************************************************************** Receipt Number: R9804277 Amount : 1, 504 . 16 07/14/98 14 : 52 Payment Method: CHECK Notation: 21586 A&D QUALIT Init : LN Project # : LUA98-114 Type: LUA Land Use Actions Parcel No: 162305-9120 Location: 2800 BLOCK OF NE 3RD Total Fees : 1, 504 . 16 This Payment 1, 504 . 16 Total ALL Pmts : 1, 504 . 16 Balance: . 00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 000 . 345 . 81 . 00 . 0007 Environmental Review 500 . 00 000 . 345 . 81 . 00 . 0017 Site Plan Approval 1, 000 . 00 000 . 05 . 519 . 90 . 42 . 1 Postage 4 . 16