Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
LUA98-128
L FOUND BRASS DSN N CONC.WIN 2 Ili CA, 11 011111 PER SLIMS REC.NO. MOM.MUNE. LS N.0.0V A W.EASS 1 110 II 11111111 11111 Cr TIC 4 CORNER Or NW 1/.1 OF TNE NE IA ri•L°.%Tr,'".. ,.SAN.SEWER MANHOLE ....,, ( 91111111 ES.STORM VANNOLE. r:130r(g:OM 2 0 ,,,T\\\;•,, ': , 25, 2 I3 23 2i. I IA I '1 I 1 CO 12,V•A,.4\''\ '', \\\VA\1 \ \ 1 \ , I • I I'• '4 T.LIVOCT: ' • 1 I 1 > \,..,\\\\• Ili \\\ \ ! , 11 < \ \ .4, ,\.4!ilii \ \ ; . . if I 1 111J li \ \ \‘'.\\:.•‘\'.' .1 ; \'.''.A.\ \ , \ 'I I '. I _,.________:._4_,__________4.... !, ..._.....— ., 1 ‘... ....,, , 7r i i ' /:1 I Lil o• Z Iyky. \ .,......... .,,., \ \ . • \ • -- ... ti t\i . I ICCM CURR•CUTER‘.•..•i 1 i • \ ',,s,,..., • , •• \ ; , ••• , \ 1 , •,- , ' i ' \I I 1 / cri os co , al 1 W < N \ '\ '-----..-_-.:... , // .1 • , 4 i 1—• co • \-• \ i . •,,':,..,,',.\„‘.,'„ : I 1.„.'''',\,:,..-.1-',,, \\.,\ , \ / I ', I 4 - , / .•-• 1 1 -......, I.!=ii , L NI, -s• q T.-$.! ii!-•-„:' / •,..",..:..f.:,.:1'.1 / \ ''' • .- \ \'.. IS ROAD EMMERT,RECCRESIG I // I: 1 1 I CO CC ....,.;:.',.:'-__,' -.....,..„ ,''''.• --'-'-` 1' - 8-14-98 ...,.\\,,,,,,,, .„,\\,_ •..., \ly i RIGS WATER YAW S'',•' \ z ' . \ FATTACITCMSAUMs 't I[ ',,SI' 1 °I"s\,\‘‘, , \ 1 \ •••.. ....._ SO•SETSACS PROM ',.\\ '''‘. \ '• \ --....,... rg,T7I''''''D / I.t 1 ..!'l ... MEW'- • •\s \ , , \ \ .. I Er CCM E.IA W.)Al - ....a.' '• I 1 1 1.. SI' / SID-SIMNEL i .• \"/ . \ A'ITZ / `..N.,. 0"......_, 2'0I Ui'g,11SrjU%r R2?oYr TSkIT II PMODV MNIISSTS IUsEu mW \ \\\' \ / ' EOM \\ \. • VL" *2.'''NE i 1.I 'z I 8 EWER RANKLE W: —VC— CAS NAN —UP— UNDERGROUND POI.UNE —59— SAMMY SESAM UNE 21 •, ,,-A- 1-- —''‘;',A..—- .—t'"-7='-‘-—...-----=-...=-..- .-..'''''. '''' .......I. ------ --ss— STUN MAN ISE —,..— WRIER RAN , FENCE LNE AS NOTED 06 li" CONIFER TREE AS NOTED 0 DEMOS TREE AS Norm V'•\''‘.;',s'. \ 'i'' \ .: / : r. - I I g \\....:','.,'s \.. Vs. ......_____....--• I I S' I SUE ot,,,,..T., BASS OF BEARD.:PER PROPOSED LOT L4ES ADASTUNEMIL LUA-RS-027-LLA, GRAPHIC SCALE Egitirgroty'rat ... WN CATALOG MEIER eieiTiE 4i1)1 SITE SURVEY FOUND Se MASS SISK IN SLACK CR 30 I / .. JOB NUMBER PHASE SCALE T-MY-0. IS I.1 s HG005 40 NORM [ i. n I (.) fr6, DR-2 QiSHEET OF E%BAN.STMPA MANHOLE IIIIE A 1172(IC T ONO N.NC)) IUNIT nnin.T RRFAKDOWN. " SO.PT. 455 4S9 455 455 512 576 5re 5R 505.950w 913 604 RSB UNIT Ttt2 5-AS 'AT 5„ S-00 S-200 21-AS 21-3 Y'0D 0L G %u TOTAL jr. FIRSTFLOOR o z x5 x z 0 w �"nmm D 1 x9 i D z z D z i w .II�I�III X Tx 15 i 2 0 113 R lK ♦% 911 112 s 12 5% 43 22T 2x 02 14O% Pry S D a NHBLE d( )) N)COMM ONE UNIT DESIGNATED ANO EGUIPPEO FOR THE NEARING SPARED. IE-9Y 4M'EO�HG Y.) N•)moms SQUARE F00TAaE m UNIT an.Tn.SIDE OF wear on.. - I 11 `\L CV\ 2L \ \ - 25 I i, i'n I W r;4\•\I 1 \,; '1)1 j \\\ \\ (E)mar Raw ......__. ) •\(El DIRT POw,'I i i`• Ro D�1Pw�r I 1 I S , f\\ rho•wla \\ 'I 1 II a) - W „ .):` )1\ \„' \\ \\ n 1.1T 4nA0� �• __ __ 11a'y anmon.SIGN_ _ J .4• ANc(rm) r � z 1N ,I,' I 1I Y ■■ o o 0 ^ .I. elo I. O ��9•_9• T_9. 9_D Q._9 ( PROJECT SUMMARY co Y F- MGX-HATER YMK 11 f�:I II 1 TRASH FN SURE �A�NKT PANNO(TP. 15,5o/EN I \ NO.OF LNNS STORIES W < I I•`:,I v_ _ 1' SATELLITE room__ m'-r xer-r TA i (n caxc..:OUTRR 12P.UNIT Ba FT.: VA IES ARRRI Z %I •d1\1')', PHOPD Sp r ©� 0 b r I I moss eunDlxD AREA: am m AU N a A. � (� RYA ''`' METuxNa I g � — H nay ay..", CODS Rre ARu: (1111 A�.a)P•. a m� 1 rE ®�� 7 \'**.\ i 0OPOSED` 3-STPEDESTRIANAB 11.:I:'I ,1 1 �Y .. , . J (1----•• > MOW..ARJH SaFT.(ws) O W Q)HYm,WT PARICNO AREA: SO.FT.(51%) 240 J: 1 DOD FucP ♦ t ; jPARKINS SPACES REQUIRED:4 ) '.•. �ro Ni Aa NA oSD°em'' v�i wP o,Eis2 ACES tle r''1 \ � Nm1GARD :'`I N - PAPKINO SPACES PRONGED: \A'' ,I \\ -.. - :1 i OECmAnNE COMPACT PARKINOG- B1 SPACES ♦ �,, C : (FF�T CONCRETE PAWNS ' --_-, _ 20 SPACES(1xq 8-14-98 �'`\\,v. t9:� qi•(-• iI NOAAgCA �AMMG- o5 \ \ ,,a --\ fl}r AIL)_ l' N /; SPACES PARgNO ePA6a aPr ;\t ,i•` , \ OC _ Yr. ._. e00 5 - ;1 STANDARD PAPKING: 0'-0'%x0'-0'(N/ wm-DATER MAW 4:` \ X'`S�"'; •SCl`>v .-• ' s 2-'CIVORDENVY AN Tw:N N . §OENAK AND 4 k • f �' !a''• 1:! I. • REAP �o PEPNR CLEARANCE Y9 \'.\\I r' IF{ -/ _ __ }, I� MlillxmnM rn OOm 1,0 \\'\`,E,: ,' E tyy� ?� rO m N� b I I a z TYPE V.1-XR.(NLLY SPRNMFAFO) /�N BID ISSUE \ 'xlaH.ac_- 54_a• 2T-6. A DcaPAxcr maw a-1 MaTF,_> CO: uSwNTED umT _D ' -EY 24'- EMavmM 1 I 7 a REVISIONS�\ PROP.1 WINO \_ FI%NRE 012) _ OR RELOCATED BE 5Y-S• n-Y-a' , L DATE PHASE e'-o. 3 a.,i,�• ''1` se-e :90'-0 R.� NEw DRMWAY NAIL 1,A I 1 j wQ \ ® b Cz co w.=„ .;- \ rl:- g- - i•61110 g 5 MAP2 a LEGEND g m♦, `���` \_ __ _ - /v lr E S> ���r��" - _ J h___._ R¢oG1Eo m M POLE U WxTFD COT WORE,2O FEET Hiw -'T 1.'.\ \ 1 /. , AgAIEHr7 r �� : Q D .t\:'1':\\\ �xG `(p le ca ba 2RR I,'� w tS uml -1 � ^ Al.• HIGH CPT BOLLARD 75 / — . O PMNSG emu J,_g-- \'..,',, (' II 0107E PAwx0 </�3 1111 25 /ti I.Y CC; ♦MOO rtxcEJ 1 ' 1 I D. g a0NsTnucnON ISSUE Ua Wr CATAL00 NUMBER GRAPHIC SCALE ri. SITE PLAN I_tl„NCB RUNNER PHASE - �� SCALDT-B0-O' HG005 40 (IN fir) NOFITH n 2 2 SHEET NUMBER xa-son. 1 0 CCN DR-3 Qi SHEET OF /1 1 ' I ` , • �yl SIL.IJI"l"ES ill Ili �� Ili SW 43rd STREET and OAKESDALE AVENUE SW ''''°lll RENTON, WASHINGTON DEVELOPER: PRIME HOSPITALITY CORPORATION co W 2 3033 NORTH 44th STREET, SUITE 375 5 °�• a PHOENIX:ARIZONA 85058 a (602)..954-1776; FAX: (602) 954-1226 L ARCHITECT: 8-14-98 ARCHITECTURAL DIMENSIONS 1600 SOUTH MAIN STREET, SUITE 275 �%)n PERMIT sUB1d1TP1 WALNUT CREEK, CALIFORNIA 94596 Z�PF0.YIi LUJRANLE VICINITY MAP (925) 932-8651, FAX: (925) 746-8744 DRAWING INDEX 0i E.... CO- 181 167 DR-1 COVER SHEET Z m REVISI O<S °" W p DR-2 TOPOGRAPHIC AND BOUNDARY SURVEY 1 g ; DR-3 SITE PLAN u __ __ _—vP SW_31st-STR ET- - -- - - - - z 3 SUMMED TO: -_ _ - DR-4- GRADING AND LAND CLEARING PLAN _ p Q _ _ -__ - 6 o CITY OF RENTON DR-5 UTILITY PLAN Q' gF DRY DRAINAGE PLAN Fri:a , SW 41st sTR:ET W DR-7 LANDSCAPE PLAN L-p,P 5.180TH '1REEi limi DR-8 lal and 2nd FLOOR PLANS r LLNsiPULlIIX1 IEE sW 43rd sT;� FOR: DR-9 3rd FLOOR PLAN W uuwc NYNeEN Ali ' 1 PROJECT DR-10 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS ��JLB NUMBER FH/SE SITE SITE PLAN APPROVAL DR-11 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 2= HGOoS 40 Wu I s sN¢i NUYe., NORTH 8-14-98 DR-12 NEIGHBORHOOD DETAIL MAP ` 181 �% DR-1 167 Q m sHEEf or ....`:'.V.'.';':•'-'...','-.;„.._., ;\, Dv,',..';'. '11111111 --•;',.. t i . '.;.,,,,,,,_;J•71.;,p,ti.„,._.__\ •. co • •6''• , ' '', '-r,'!::n•-,'"bIs<;,V-,\ \ , WI • .• . ;,;.- ;,. <I,. P, .\ ;-.44:sicH:. ; ; • > ,;•'6'.',"- '. ': ‘, ••• :1 11"1. • : :;, ; \9-,-,..".\" ., ' \ : ::,:;:; •. ,.r- - .. : Ilr:;•-:41•1 --,<-- , 3 II; _J , , .,„__ ._.. '‘ ' ; • ,-- ; , , / \ '.! ' • 0 z • " , • X 0111•17.E 07.4e , lkk-•11:1 l'-•• ' ' WU) 0, . - 30 0 30 60 I— U) 14 0 ;,'i; ', •..A;714:1r_l_ ' • 6 I 1 [ —71' -) '. • ''' ' w a z '1,1i1'... ', . ,,•ii. '77' . 0 •.-.. (-.) '',.® BASIS OF EVA.=PER PRIPOSPD LDT 0 Toe of Precut'Slope 20.0 Lolo AILUSILENT PO.LUA-DO-017-LLA.- , • , SEE SURVEY NOTE f M f ,, ; . •„ il II; ;LI; • 1, 'j;•!: co ai c0 .„i;,I; • • ; •:,.:<• ,... •• • , ---\ , i J • • ;,. :Al ; , : 4, .i.. i ; i.:; :‘,;:.:,:. /: ;',.., Eatiiaril'atr • <,°0; , \ ."•':'''\'''. \, • i r".. .-.. .4.1715111114--M- ,.......,AiS• , / ' • < ! ';',I , ; , " ,'• /•-;\':1;:, ;‘,\:‘,1\.,:",'.'..te -- ifili '‘'- -'...i.'•.;-;'-...4':W.;.1: .'''' ..- ;.3:<•-•:.-T.::: :: :::6,: :'‘•1:-.1..•:.::: ::-2-:,:k.1 •j LEGEN2 ; i m tap i9.0 11, ,-,..;•..::.„;;.. ..N::..;-‘5::5:4,51 C)( ' ' .f : 1,.\ \ ' I ' ' ''' ' " . • 110XULIENT MLR°AS WED e CORNER MIND AA NOM SWART MDR 1.IAM. i ,1 . ...2.:'' ''1.,''' STORY 012.14 WIXOM 0 W 1 5: i -, PIT ANCPUI I a) CC',. l.. 1 .\ l, , ' ilila .,...x '.-Z,.•``.;, „. ••,, • • '' '' '- ,....,,i,,•‘•••.‘'•,:/: Ai' 'a( U1241 PCIX POWER VAL, H \k,\...\ 1. \ ......\\'-,•,O'. I \ ilitlhel,:s...••••l, ... .?:‘,..-..a .,:, ell......1111 W,...l.:Ii••.•:\ :•.:.:'''.::•: ii.l.....---, '',1 rill-.'Pl Cq, if .'::; . , ; ‘..... < al lid' .-..... ---• im -- • ...• t, . li w„ , .- . q 8-14-98 i' \\1 1'',. ', ,i\, ''`.•..--,..-,•:'''WI',,-‘..:‘:..:Z:. ::.,*2.:,:.'.; m ---.......,. _ "i..:;•::- ‘ •,;,.;`'..''.'•:•••‘'‘`.":::',.6:.,.. :: 1:-.!(41.0,1• I:''. !"‘..'.!\V.,•,,\ ., ,...\\.` ®':`•::...•,•':›lid ;;•‘...',.;...,;.. ,':::,' 12-..., ' ----;;;:•,. ‘,.'-=,-_-,,-‘s,,-3,r.L.,,,,,,..,;.,,,-.• -' ''.',",•ni"1 •E',I i;"11_;;%1 r ; . 1 -VP- .DIOEROROUND.r... POSER LOS ••\.a.:‘,\'',„\•., .‘ 1 \\‘' ., l,:I'd n.,.s.,:l,n..l .:•,:‘,..:. M -\.,.,,,. ,_,„,gl: :•,•:...•...Z•:,.:. •,.., •*‘• 14 M asT.-1\•,:•:f.11 -,'•'-':.......,-- 1 ..-:1.1f: P..,WE,. ---''..11.- 7SANIG"'41".r:T. .:::: ••.V V.,\1...:,\ \1\.\ '... l::i 11 ..l•Il•l. :''''':.: . .----.••••• ...... '...2.;.',. IN • -1'‘. ". .'=%.•,'-':•••,••.••••,•>•.'.-: dr ''''''-. I,•-,''(.; ./ , . ,1 i, —.•,,....,...•:„., \ F.,..„:„.......7„ 0 1RSE AS .CDP:RonTRIDS AS WORD.. k. .1 ., 'e t ,\ ,:,k,•, al :••,N\•••,VZ,N, e „. , . ,, '..1 12• '.•'''''..S,•:• .••n leR4•.-...• '...--41 I l .1i.l l ll' ',E.::.-P-1O • '••••l'''''•'.''•l•''''''-....''\'''''\\\ ., I \\\ E,'....,.''•it l' :'.: '••:.::‘‘‘..: 5 W4,1..,)•PADT..(',lZ7 l •llrl Ia.. ' :•'.`.,'.:•'ls...:\ fir (-(•.;!NI g:f., •• \\:\,.., .• • \ \ ,.:.',•;ii •'..'-'7..., -,-:;.•,:::• I. ,atirlsx •,:,- rti is..••••,..1:'::•••:,,:•••, IFI 191'.., .i I!i„i.4,„ I m;:.; i 1 \ ''' ' \°': '' '\ , ''.'-', ...'.' . .,- ..., 0 -2-,`.-•' '-•\:::•••:,', Ileir ; ''i 1 A,',. 1 -,,,::" • 1 ''''',"'',`, :0L-' '• - L.2 - '`",,'t•Se la •••c'S'l •:.7,,' '4,1,, all '\....`.‘\"•'4.•‘.. ill' A i .• ' ''f.'l,• • P•5•-• l l• COi PERMIT SMOOT', ,'' V'',,\\'• '' ',, ',ill ,.:.N,Y,V,:'• ;I .<-.0.,:e-,,,k..-.4.0,„ . „.. I, :::-......,„."- .0- ,. :;- , ,,..-,1 ! -.: ....., 3!, .\'''''1.-:\' '\ 11 '‘...• s:•••'''' . '''' ''AlikiKI.:' TO ‘,:s.•••:. ::.'‘..: . II 1) 1 1,' iji,r',,:.,i1. : '''',?..• ! •‘,.,s.:.• ... ,„„ if , '..,:ss.::`... M '''''•'?.>'•'''''''''' ':•'-''''''' a . $$$Ir , Ir.. 1,..! ::: ., : e" q• , .i7, ': Z',PERMIT CLEARANCE 1,..%- '\‘1'y,\'',\'''\ \ I to so,-;,..,.-s•‘••••'..,--,-:: IN 'L. ".' •••=<'::., -,,: ,-,. --;•.,-,-.. ,A. ‘-,-,s.\‘•,".!,‘'‘' '0,•-,..•,:; :`:,. mahrAill--1.:.:2411.1i, VOIIIIII '- •••• , '1 '3"fil l.,)".:.BO ISSUE ,,,.. l'•••'''.••• :•.t‘''s.\,;c4'e - 1110,410. 'ss..' .*: 74 1,i!IP :•„: • 1 -4„7.-±:.7.15.-----.--- (1) "eliiiii111 all r pit. , p .1.-'.;,-.. ..Z.';',;'='' zi REVIS1001S.E sE .:".,•:•,_. ,l,S eA".?,:,,l,l•-• \....., \. ID '',....-tb•./ ° .s., 11 ..1•7•;' ,j l'l I. l lli:'l s,. .... v;,..,:.,,i, ! ;I:I:l.,;,.! it : li 11 •1 l )'I LIE C72 ll .•:••:.(l'E i V.N.,•, \ \ I .\l‘. •ls, _I- '-.,g:',':._4-',',uff- \'0.\''..:‘...:', ‘• \ • ''' -ifE,P.V. '.••.:,/,'" ,' k ...,-; V;.i!i ,- ' ; li <,5 ,,,, lii 1 V‘""''' '',.. __......-- / .,1,1;:%11:.. • -d '' ' • , 13 rt 1 ,i" '.--:. '1;3 ,<,1 , ; : ;: HIM D. . ,,, , ;! 0 P:!, ! , u .910REUNE eCOMODOAL SMACK,SAMTART SEWER DE 1- t-- ,:' 1, :L5,' 1.0 ' STORY ORAIP MSS StIOWX AS COMO 01 TRUE PUNS ARC 0714MMIZOOMMIHEVer SWAT" l '''SOD NOT APPROVED BY 11.MP OF RENTON. CONSIRLICTION ISSLIE ,. • i ' 0 LI i •• W o.CATALOG NUMBER i "H (‹ PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN NORM SCALE 1 SCV-17 I . i: 1 -1- HG005 40 ...-.a iNEET Nummit - 1 0 DR-4 j .tta SHEET OF o:iceFin 0t( ,41 •Ol,,._.........- II II: 1- 1 '11111111 ID ',.C.)i., , •': ,)'�11'i FlRE`HYDIZANT A55Y '4 ,I ' `\ �I'I,Peil� j, CO LLI ' ^`.kdh!?— ',l • I 1NRUsr BLOCK 1j `I },. I Srk 'I,:: i 6•EB•M TEE(MA.� 8%8..7 TEE(FLAW) , •',( '- Q e'NEIER SERVICE ""8"DDCV(92E TO BE Ib ? 3 ' II (SIZE,PER MECH,ENGIN DETERMINED BY ENGINEER)' \ 1 j% , r. Icc Sissimi W .�T. \ `iL ',`t'; iHRuST BLOCK THRUST BLOCK ! I Yjl•i t't 30 0 30 BD :� .: -) _ ` MY11T E AT),IB' Ji E 11 I F •OV < a �l I: : I' -_�_ .. !1( E'i PER mDPmm LOT I I 1!25 IF 6;DJ. av I {�,,\ `+� .. 'i BASES OF DE ARTS: ERA-ao-SEO LOT Z 0 ( rn � 6•VAOLT.DRAP1 J 3 IE . VERTICAL OMAN NAND no7 I.. 9JpBT]•EE.(FLYNJ) I ,f. Fe Y • AS i B-k6r CV(FL.L1) -L, ' ,'• i i i I t T,s'` ` :'' rwxo i�w�v G st m'J a4«of W A (./ REDDGEI2' 425 IR B'D.I. : ' 1 S , s ` 0 z Eg)P(JHG(NJA.� I� 7 LF 6`1).l,���,,,'■Cr ' w�, x : 'iff ' I. O T`+�7HU�t BLOCK ,���� ``�\ �■ �i I , jiii Ny Etl51m4 til: I .' •'',•• 4, ��\�'' I I J I'•[(a I-I I I I l 11 I j 11 �'; '; CONNECT TO EX 1z' LEA¢ CO `� Q "I....'...,". `;..:t '`, - y •\_, I I`.J j `li tYA6•a12•TEE(FUND) o' 4�i,"``�", 'CIIIP_�.� ;.`" :,\,`.�.,..,� \.,;:`,i_�.�_ ■1'■ e'cv FL,Hy RN.F N. SemHTI) ,!`(i�.t/z BEN/6 ° 'a\c��`., 1 �E .•\.- �•: ;. ,.��,.' .,.\. �.�: m �• Ia •1' rHRusr eLooc o rawAS PE JnSI ?' l' Tigii. ; `:;' i_is? :,.x..:•••:\:`...-- -:-->\.; -\:.`c wr 6`s 6 GRyx t !•E RUST,BLOLK ,`Q ��� .. GUY ANCHOR �� i. ,1 or' I ■ ;\,c,\\\}; .\\ "� ti''�� l a iiriiivn 1', '•'; • Iri tea' w '-\S _ `.�t,' i. '!i_mot y EpSi.FlRE .�' 1 "'T,a i1.,.6e.>S\ i'.' �4 \\` ■. -L"y •\\ rY L% I p i- 11 Ma ASSY. 8-14-98 ',l\�rix..tl.e ,11/'+ .; �.: �■ l��` �,`��`` �'���: la _�a l�,��"r'E I � Q DEMONS TREE AS 're iifia 4 ,•`,iq't,z,.0".ouT,)\.. P, t.i, ■ ..'.\. \•�, ,■ .. _ G:'!: yr:`i'. 1'tl�3^-- i- r`i j( - , va •.,, ATAI OIH ■ \ ' fill i) W IJ J,L�s..l ,. �R.N ^I,: PR `1'•�i' •'��.� ��`-,■ :`i`• -_ -w.x • IRl ® Im,1!(: ,,� �. IE H, ..D ENE ,\', \ 1\ `�'= rayti ,\ \` ;i -1 ,,a! • `<;. ,a:;? ;, rev; -i.'' t'£f ? ___._WATER Pool I7 ,. E ;� • I6. ;,.Iiii:;; j - r> Gyre HYDRANTALV T t, • ■ �r, • \; . Ili ® j NT _ \`1.,�`� \a °� �11 •'`\'.;:```.. �� ^i�44 :II .:\ `,'\' 41 I A'} ) '• vi;W ,q vJo PERRR ER1BlOTTA1_i.np��`�\\\\\\! �P�'`: •:\•\.`` i�' • ,��` •^`, 1 j 8il I••:! - f...„---- 1.._ _ 'at?'- -.1. Lm PEWIT CLEARANCE ' '�' �'` '59 '§" .,\i 1�k�g4�:\;::,' WIC-••" ,a; _ _ ;I li f f� --_=::: oo �0� 1 _ �j }\I ; _ h1=._E.SA.!A•7 _n BIDIS4IE -.\ :... .i (i117E„ Ir RDASIOONS ..'6'DJ. g 5D ".E,'. �`•'.::rv:rLT i wi(��� �•_ • vau — BB lF D. ',i _ .' Jy._. , i I I i. W: h PRASE .• ym W k�.1•ts\`;` J 1 ,�i'''s\> , G '"r,'�= ':r ---^+mix--�` 5: ' --- -- it �1\�11,f ni • \ L_- -- -- \ SSNH %r- ."Y.TI_.. 3 _ ji_. -" a enil'I'.. BDg - 6- -- l1'H,E'Ksl �S ''; RIN24.85 _ �` ;iii Ii JN `Vi„ ` 2 - - - ..ut,+_ .SI H..eoulmoAL WHAM.SANITARY WK.AND BNB'TEE(FLaMJ) w.I.'. `:f'ti1 • IT '(( t A. STRIA OONiEwm%iExBOSx�PARK MAY II,PLANS BY BABARCHHAUSEx ` }1 BNB'CV(FLAW) FIRE HYDRANT AST '^<� r I% {i tl CONSULTIG ENUNEMS,MO{4N1.AT THE THE GF..16SKN Q F ')', B•AB•REDUCER THRUST BLOCK / ! I; MESS PLANS WOKE 1 APPROVED BY THE MY 6 RENTM. 1. O COUPLING(RJAJ) rpH„E' 3 LL THRUST BLOCK I 13 tF 8'O J. ' ' D O CONNECT TO EX 12' n I L ` R'OON51RUC11[N ISSUE 12',,8%12'TEE(NM) !' B•CV(FlAR� • U uai THRUST BLOCK I ' ' rALOG NUNS _ W W CA UTILITY PLAN i F-P SCALE:I'•30.-O' I MO NUMBER PHASE 2< HG005 40 NIORM ! ¢ y 2r1 ... U SHEET MAIM CC„ DR-5 QoSHEET OF k 11 • ' 11, ,,,;ci,;.,0,9,..'!.•..i.4",11 ,' 'r.,;,---:-.r.r-2-,-„•-• 1 11 11111111 4III.'I-HIII.RI.II;.'"Is.i i "11111111 O'. +CI I 1 bI-4, V I,P1E 3.3 i \•il.o CD . i \ , ; LLi \y, ''',.' ;-:-, i.'t r.. R ‘. ......i.\:,1!, t 1<,'\4•c),.<<,- ,c3) > • .. ,;AI\'.•In:1 ‘ STOW,DRAIN,4,4-CD C9 4, ,$)SE,TOE I , I i II ; ,;I'[...r'I ,,,\01,,,,k,4‘../ % ,.."... !, SLOPE 231 1.1133 \ !I' . ------- . , ,:•,.,\.\\ \ ,... . 1,:d;i;!a; : . 4'. :: _.. ' 0 ; (P;i ; ; \,.,..,„,„„ ; .„,,,,.„.,..,. .• p ',0'. 4, 0 e,,,,., „,,,. \ •P 0 k)..Fr7C 7.- "7-'1- -laririgar- 1 fratillffiry mts._ <40.4C9 4-,1 , v iiii,;...----.. . -.. -... ,•,., . , VALLEY CUTTER e zfr 0.,' - ..- • '. ''r. '' -, 4,, \ ,•• (iL 7 ri, !IIS.TA1.1.SOINI---' ,11,A.,,, \• - _ a -... — _ tl.VINT,I505;EFT' °'I'r ... Firi- --- . .. • . •.... . . • ... ...... '..:F.P.P" ' ;-,li°-:\.-...,-- s 7,-,• Pl R74 k:2.• -::';::.••.•::••=•.'•,,,-•,,S;s•-,'::•-',4-‘=';':\.•'...•'i• S;.iii:iFia.iL‘:: '''''',C•c:\\\‘,.‘. ; i •1 ^','\.\\\'47121111 7:':',•,‘,.' :.',•: ;‘-...• :...--'•,',;. F7, :1T,':; ;;,;•Y' . I:i 1'!‘i•.s. ; . " ,,,i''',,'.\\‘,401A lli ,;:'::::,';,•..:'::::.'.:,:'::`',.:"':.:',-.:-...::::::‘;;.', .::Y;'<•:':::,'. ' I "') . ' / \la 'n•-14, ;PAP' ° :.‘,•.,..:,,,,I.'.,,s ',','-.:'‘‘,',•-,%:,,,,..., ,,.••••• ,.. .:1 ; )1; :,.::::.:,::,X•:••'') ''' ':•:'. :- \ ? ‘-d ).••:-., > :..= ;;;c -,•,. ,. i',1,•:,',•-;••• -, \ \•,\‘,..,•:-.:-,e.••.,•004 ,s:,:.,,.1•:',..-:. .;‘.. • -'''%t. ••• " c.... .. ;lid .';',•: ,=, :: '''-1,...,.. \\:•'. '', ' \•••-'-.`1Y'..,All ,• ••:-;'•';-:•::,.s.•:. ..:. .>-- ‘•\\.,,,•1' ••• 0, \ ',.,;\ipoini :' s:::::::;:.:.• / \ 1 = ,...-;,•,\; \•,',, ..•. \ •••, \.;,•."' Isfy.:,.:,;,;;•::„;.:,<;•.• '‘.:.•;4•4,• \ gal .\:•':Sii,I15,.:&,&R. m,,,, .III'{If s ..1's,:-..:- :‘'.''. ..a .:I'S.t‘":‘.. I II' :P7'.I5*1!. / WIPERMIT WELLUTTAL CE .„... \ \ \ ,.,-;•\ii •Wa-,':::',, y .... lu 23.1 Iiii Aci PURER ciZARAN \NO,li BD ISSUE .,„‘1,...,'II,\\'I.)'.IL, •II ,Illt I:I,' ''); ''',.s.' .7 3...-..,3-,--..--I..-I=I ;3",'Ia... I'IR\\\'',.\),334*-0 4 1474P;;.‘'#\ :: 11[617'''.-‹; •-I '— VJ z 1 REVISIM p. „.., 04)4,46mi—ill- ' 1 ,, \s ,,Nir,,,,,,,(. ....-nm.„ ,,r,_...„ ._,„•• w: .....„„ ....,.,, E • •,, , ___L • -,--.-- ,,,,,, .ALL G,._a__V;7E__;,i...3:;,.7. 21 N;),4 \' - - ." -.k:n*'I'',o.111/E I I •I'ir 1II\ Ji A 7'.•••'.:g:'.,T,-•‘.-'. \'‘,'''\\‘;‘, '‘' \\,, '.6 \ --,'1,7-1,5.' iii i <' a NUE CCI 2 SW SHORELINE DRAHERCIAL SETBACK SANITARY SENIR AND STOni ORAN Lon UMW AS MING ON Inn PLANS ARE PER ONGOOALE BusNESS PAF3f,PRASE L PUNS BY BARCHALEEN D.2 ;.....•.,_, •,.', CONSOLING ENGIN.,.KCI.3911.AT IHE TNE OF stillIASSON TH;SE PLANS VON NoT AMID.By THE cry OF RENTCN. 111 0 CONSTRUCRCN ISSUE (.7 DRAINAGE PLAN i w i ,C0AT::::SER,.. -r I H G005 40 . NORM i 1 ... 2 SKEET MOSER DR-6 q I CC g <„i SHEET OF ---�® rP . . I`,� tO »,,,,, ff— ^ C omo,.:;.�ya� o =!�- '' 4-3 c '-' -T7-,0e- .•.,.,....1).,-- 'i A i eRA� °°°°.. . t is ', qy ?Iti j r • , p 1y T } '. _} r 0 1 1: :N it ; _ alk Sf , r.a� � � A 8 w"r ;i ' NV ®&,, '' '� L"'" ®,® , ti ": i,› EAR �j 'I g S.W. 48rd SFHt ET !� /.� U V Rssn. n imE ®®000•os.Qo /40 Our i tt I €it 1 jnhiiiiiu .}qvl Epp i Till101 1" f1' if Oh Will 1 Ei1S,�� iflflE iFfFF€Pi:iFF 4 [t M Ogigg0Ogi; !WHIM!IM 1 ! 11 ARCHITECTURAL;DIMENSIONS HOMEGATE SUITES 5 SW 43rd ST.&OAKESDALE AVE.SW g aN A 0 RENTON,WASHINGTON I -10., 1Tt-6• I1 11. \ ROOM ROOM ROOM ROOM ROOM ROOM 91, ROOM ROOM ROOM • ROOM ROOM ROOM ROOM T• i II .1IIII -1- 1110 III III I-AFL' I �r JAA III ' III �� Q4 III IIIi 4��W III IIG III JAA OW . , .�lOi �, IEl CI..iI I��• II. 1 �CJ.n111._.�:.L�G 191.-,�._� -_AI .;r..LAG 9CI•-� _n•,•l,i 1 .CL, ._•_.r.,ISEI .SG ff-t l'1.-_..r-.1=M1 r n r Li CORR. 1 Q CORR. ECG TG 1 IOGI.-I, n 9GE.•,, •.rJG IOCS ■ pp•u1 N:-. �,_. 4A�� = V��< ..,�•� n I ,Vr.. �.. y �•YY = 4 �t.. "'V� r �I n ii 1 3 N 16, 16 III •411i„, III III- II • B•,,,— , II. Ilc ,II k . II II- �QI �_I 0_.— ROOM ( ROOM ROOM ROOM ROOM ROOM '•• • 1 TAR '_ ROOM ROOM ROOM -•• •• ROOM ROOM •. 1 DM. ' Ili ROOM \ _ - Z=__=s Z -=:T Z =_1 CORR. - 2= =s VI 7= ROOM I -� _ ' ROOM Q ROOMral •! I L ��F. _ W J - 1_ I Z 5 y Q 1i y u u y II W 0 f t.a•-a — 7-15 -I.9 e r CD >L ROOM 31- ROOM L- .M.,3 Q Z i - r -- I,s ROOM : ROOM ROOM I L 7'. RODM co 4:1 Q PE[i I n n II to 6 (�� I ROOM b L W Q O ROOM 1z B II II ROOM II I CO 1 ROOM a _ I I ® n - --1 P OOM I EI I, EI r 8-14-98 J. Rr_y it ROOM ROOM L ROOM ROOM 1 L- 7. ROOM .-1 =f. 1, I=,.A. G�'_ L, 0 I n II it I m n ^ II VENOWO I 11 ii .'Y it I Y �I l;11 'V-•• li col PERYIi SltilfliAL -- TV/rEL. mat vE oII — ROOMC 3 Zn PERIM CLEARANCE - `` MEN J a IXERCRE ■ 3- - _L -1 ROOM 1 ` ROOM 1 � 1. 11 ROOM ROOM _ wisp. • ■B ISSE ROOM )1rt I-I 3 ROOM c n n 7 4 NwF S I.RY ELEC. NVAG HVAC - b 5N-1111111 i . i� • ELEc �,."-� Lr == II �[ ��IIIIII. sr. Iti ir .. •N 11 Z7 REVISICota PIUTc y, - EMP T01LE1' _ SECURED STOR, .r CORRIDOR UN. 1 W a T i- _ r.RG 1 .... - - MG 1E O'i Gl �� �� �GI I� II OEnCE •E s N •„ + "! +�`°_ )...1 13 �, ..�. ,,,I ('..GAS, ) "lip r MI II- ''HVAC a �1 II. II 0 tI I 1 ' H . _ -.II II cv - ROON-- }:FED LOBBY - - MR. ROOM . . \ .'m000J i BELOW I Z� �U ii V NBP1E' Ii OFFICE ,I ' • ' J Q3 ,,,,• vFSnULE a .\ .� .I— .__.. Cr \ HVAC �� MC \ HVAC INAO D. rv'cnNsmLO0OG ISSUE,s-n•y _ - tar-� �._R. U� I 'll JCR I, ER RUSE _0 HG005 40 FIRST FLOOR PLAN ' \ SECOND FLOOR PLAN 0 r"NBA ® ) ems thy-r•o• ® ) SCAEUm•T-0• 0„ DR-8 NORTH NORTH Q H SHEET OF .d li, s s 3 7 1 ROOM ROOM ROOM ROOM ROOM ROOM ROOM - III IIIII 1. Ii- 'III_ III III 4 ii,- . TAI-.I_,h, CORR. co ROOM ROOM ROOM ROOM ROOM ROOM ROOM STOR. ROON 11.1 g _ _ STAIR-„ �_- 7' ROOM Q ROOM :I " - Z ` I O ems ..1. r if ROOM ? 0 1 ROON : ROOM co oo Q V 6 'pZ 2 ROOM M Z L. ROOM .91 n..^ I CO Cr I� 11 e=r 61 r 8-14-98 G ROOM ROOM 7'ROOM I ' n n ROOM Y n e i Il (o m S PERM- ntUTLL I ROOM _'C • TI I -:�" '.- PERMIT a i. Z�PERMIT ROOM ROOM n- n �' 7 On Be ISSUE 16—,1 IIIII7 f I !l —RAGEG: lRENSIONSTAI _hi-i,,' �JCI..>�:_�-I STNR ��` �— n I. vie L� OAiE PXASE 17 HVAC'—� IE I 5W5 A ciiiL.,, Ei •7GI iCl..� L ii _ii Ilo .!:,,.. ROOM - ROOM ❑'.Z7 -❑ I ROOM -H-1 JW y-14 -A r 1 1 R00 III ROOM : -I-e o QA L.., _I i CC 3 �. o no IBRA,c1,1 U�CO "I W EAU=NOSBER �•rL•l u�i JOB RAMER PHASE =s�HG005 40 THIRD FLOOR PLAN 1.' EEt MOB. ® ) pP.IR 1/M•.t-- Uh NORM Cr„ DR-9 QmO,EEt OF -••••••,.4..‘,...,::,-..,:,..,:;.:::-;;;W:,,,,:-;,:',:.:,;;:>";,•,', :.'",:-,•-..:-.;::,.';•..''. • ./,:•4,'..•.::•.•>‘;,.,,..,-.:,..-2•;•. (.....-:,;.-••;,:. •4:-•"*.•••/•;,‘ -,,-?;:4.:- ::i;•• .' *-, ,"-e-•')/)..;'..-4•• •;•:.;?.-",•' ,,,,.....„ II ...-,,?...,/,:,',...-,•,,..„..•,.--,.:.-.4,) 44 ':.. •••.,....,./.•,::,:,,....;),..,'---.,-x1 ;-.4>.?;<::::.. 6••:-:`...••"•y;-.4• '").' -.•,.....4;..-4"/;••;;•,..:?..,.:•:%.,',I'• f-'• ,......./.<-v....,,<,..,-,,,,,,,,,-./,,....-2-.,-..,1,,-•--...,-,..,.Y.• •;`,:'•-• ..;•%:,'•••••z-.x.,:... ..•.:4: :;...:,;• )4•2)-4• ‘,.:!,•;;:.,..:x).;•;:4'.....': •.;.,;.(.... ...•••••=:••,..-.•••••••' ,:.•: •- :;:;.•:',.... 4;;.1-•';? '% : ;:; . '') '/..?;-,,,;..-:;,,,;. e,.F,e.i:.:44'',:,,'-'/,'...•,'..,'X';'''':'".''/"'. '.:''..,''',',•::''V ic.-i'-;::',-f e'.,.,::''',•-..:!.:5'.'.< ';;"'`)j ‘ ') ?:.'''>......•.,:,: .,.;,<',::':.•''."A';':-'"c-'.;)')',:'';::'Z'A..'!;,"..,.')''':!..,.*:*:,..,:• ,..?;;;:,:;.',i.-:.-,:),?. ., ..": 11 111111 111 0110 ..',, ,. .,1;.•;, ,,> •,;W',,;:•;;?:. . ..;i:: ' ...•: '.W:''' ,,': .),...",i;.,, ..•4*c.-„';'.:,::•;,,,;(',;,..':. •• ' A.-i-;;%,..‘;',..,.1.:7.7,n-::.'z'/sy,•,' ; :;: •/.;>....,/..:i> „,•.,., :.-4 ..-;;-• o„,,,11,7,r,.*:6- ,..:-7, •„•>.;.;.):,...."*,,',,:‘..,'..', , ...:'-'''''),,F,'.'.•.,',',•..,e,,-;'-;47;f4-`.',,,1!"):!:,:',.. -,,,,,',-,::'',.s.si?..?,..y,..Vy,,,,•..7,),.;,.9,-.;4 4„,..6-,,g4,..c„x'/.:,:.* '''';:INOT A Ma Of 1105 SjEWITrA0 ,44... .'n.?1,:''''.••'.t6:0'9-i'lq'',---•*:-•';'•'-::-Z..;>?/,',;);-:'.•,;.)"''..; ,,?,..:•A'. & ,;',4::;:i,;;:vin;4-fp2„.',..).:',. ..,-; ,, .,, ''.)'..s;'.W',•:;:;.'' ..'::. "4;./. ' :' ....'' 111111111 gai l''' • A' I BEOOBA.BW.T.- ';' . :`:<:C.‹';''''/:..1.5."5;.,:`''..i./..f:"^:,;,.,,/:e.Y:9::::.., •..,5c•:''...e' '..''•:',..2.C'5'5,';',.,.;!....N.;".i.X,:,:' .'.' .?"? 'e?'".1.'''''''.''':4'?'''''''''.'. ,';'";,,;';•.-,..„, ,-..-., ,-,....-•,--, •IR,;4:,;,':?,X,"ir.:', ','',K''.::?.:4`.47,'-''''' ''..):-":W*,',,,','1•'4'4,',4-4F-,,,,,4-eF.-:::-,'::;'"5,,--"?:•11f,.,,,•• -,,..- ' 4,--' ..'•'''-•'-'''•' `,4):;:!Af's) 1,-,,,,,,,,, kno?,:,. ._ _„--q, az' -II g:41 — CO ....i........ .,.::::...;s.,....vite.4..,,J,...,,,it...14 ,,,,71 ,,,,,te,.,,.,tx., :i.,.. „ .._.2..c: ,extm.....,awg„i.c.,, ,..ii,, ,AL,,,:;,:s,„,,,,z(,,,,_,4A F.,ti- 11,,,.:1.4 ,---,, r . -pi IM '''.5'../:(. ; I'''"':?*-.: '' ttikr..4 , I : ''A• :_....'. . ? ....,,,, -,-,..,...... '.. %''''' =,,iffN-i:.'''- ittii.':' rag - ..tlifil- ,71.,, ,,,%., r,... org.,Ari.. .. trg !-i.-",-0''-'''',. ,, c,1.: rm...., 1.i,.,--A.1......,t.-... . eq. wW-7 7 8.• i:•;:ttdll .-MI;?- ,' '`' ...,m 6t, ',i''' W' --.X:!Pel-IP6/la ".' ''' —1 .!!. wild '-.•d... z4,.,-Je..,,,,';,t.;-,.V:„,?...ft. ._..7,t7- : ,--,4‘,„.., !i...,,...1 toi grill Ilmear, IIMIgril rflliN on 0 z =••=kir,owil Ili :g,i 1 aganiti e-1-.,,,--s,,,,s..;,;.--•:s,,,,-0,:-;i3Ociv, •,4-.0,,s, WO .11,,,__,.---___A a..., ,,,J__ ..,--- ,1 _._ ..,.:077,_.:ni .,,„,_..,, , r , —WS' C° 0 ) CO a MAMMA WINOOW,2 / gt5.S"''''''''' DECORAIWE COLUMNS, COLOR C CONINOL ODINT(TTP.) H is( z FINISH COLOR D Parreari 5 2 ' .E1,1 0 SPCUT.PAINT 2 ARCHITECTURAL GRILLE OVER CO fDS CO WOW fl "'". InITAILLI Ag="1.1.ree • < NECH.are SOUTH ELEVATION P SCALD fl War-T-Cr 8 -0 LU 4 1_ m z o w i (13 cc 8-1 4-98 ELEMENT OAS WALIc..F.0.91.3 INVIT AS.TOLL FRONT, NNW..Ag..., Iffla alg,cPANIT MA FAS02,,I.FONT V ' •''''''''''';'''''''" Vigif gghON:Yew...) ,.... CD i PERMIT SUBMITTAL rat ,,,,,„:„.„.„.:_,,...„',...:M.'7,p..1..,,,,,,,k.;:e;Mx'1;',i,ft';',N.:-4.;7•:.>:;,4";:x;7;;;;V2'..°"M:'...-..r:,',',1::',)''...':..7.1'.;:,^,C',V-4.. .ii-V,P.1.5..:;11,1jeart.?':'YY;--f-0,,f1;:iti.. ;: '''''''" ..,%;::*. Z,j POW CLEARANCE ...•. 7,,,,,WZ : . ... ;. ,; -i'n1W17t4'. ,, ,,:kkg." -,,r;MOSD•-.„.'.Cr.. TiA'','' :'' -. .. 13,5'N.,':.&>,. l'jp.,:i4i;-itT--•--.1--ilMipr-00•:,,,, ,i4,..;;;;,4;,;•.g.;,,,,e f,,-7,a,m„,. •,-,:i,,,,...4 .-::::Vp- 0[4.0..;•;iligk,-. 12;Ai8a ..3.0:-Ms :. . ,, ,,,•..„.,.,,, ,---,,, i,c..;,,;::;,-5;:„..,-,,,-. 7,.,•._,...::,•,.,••,,,,-, . ..,..-„,), •.•.;,-;:•••••:-:4 ...2"-ao ISSUE.. ,,, I9F--_. ;6?•1'). qr,,,, '' ' h1;-:1 '''.Wki:.. ' '''' ''''''''.''''' ':'' : •: ."-: ...: ::::, 1:.::::•':::::f 1:::: ::::!,;3:::: EN g NE EN 1.0- ..-. -.. ,,'. • ',.!::::• !'„::::".:::;'.:1 --I- 11;,--. jo 4 EN ;::.. .NE,g NE.12Ai•N_N.? NE : ., ...., ,....; 0 zrc,REVIS10N p.A. . fF'.ef,''.?,:'.:1•• .... .3',.: MM MM '.....,,,MM•:01 „••_,_,M•, NS,. ..- !-. - w.•, -, i , i ;...,., I i .: T2,-.. =0 OM'%.' ' —", IMMI,'*i '!! ; ! ! - .: .' . ......':';• 13131-. - .'. 7.:--- ----:4 -Mill:-- ' W: , : -;,•....,...•',....., ..II -;;Im !,,;•,-,,:::-;;r•-..g IT.;',..'(.::::.''. ::::$ 1T1 V4::. ......(r, lig 4;1';ii 1 EEFEE :, :1 EE _.,,,EN NE, • i.pm,__EN.. M —s ---IMI i l;--- .; A''';--; iiii'ii: , '.,,.,,----:...',,,,.. ,,,. . • f' . -.- -FEH'- .'1'j.-'ii;s:'''l-I 1 im:--11"•,' ''''. '... ...-'....'; .:::::fi::::; :::: II),:::::•:': :::':1119111111:9.117:7191 .. 06 I 1•2,,,,,.4,-- '; ---mil:,::::-.....:::e,....-1-::::''''''111WIIi Ife 'me INE rogi AL' ' ---•'im iimi ma BINE ,-- fr 6 _I __„,,,i,,,,„'„.•„, ...,., .111,-,... ,,.......mar -- .-- wi.:1VAIN"taMYPI'Allas'mmigiLinnlamakarill..= i- - - ) Wfr,,,IrUtr;,, METAL DOWNSPOUT,PAINT FN.COLTS C ALUMINUM WINDOW DNISII COLOR D ARCHITECTURAL NIECE CANT Tnialt ArarCDreln.' OECONANVE DENTAL(IT?,) EATS r--KJ cCNTREL MINT(WW) CC i EAST ELEVATION D. EXTERIOR FINISH LEGEND 1-1''' CO FINISH: NOTES: 01 1scww61.1101.111.0 MARK: SCALE 9/32'-T-0' A PAINT: SHERWIN WILLJAMS#2201,GOLDEN GATE TAN W 1-CATALOG NUMBER ii__ B PAINT: SHERWIN WILUAMS#2332,GENTRY CREAM CREAM I 1,f,JOB NURSER PHASE C PAINT: SHERWIN WILLIAMS#2446,EDELWEISS WHITE D H0005 40 D PAINT: ICI 1023,BLACK SW DK.GREEN AN CC§ DR-10 <a!— SHEET OF 1E rii , , „:,,,I., 11!1 1 1 • ',.i:.-A,411! ■ I I i pryii "IN W ,t l ( t .f,4�^f�F. Timir • Nr,s"r M, I i ■::is o ., > .e-,1-I„,-;• n,',wi-,- �s=t'`,,, .v a.^-:,EEeao[asuex y ap ei _ :: ■::...■:: ,;F1kl, -Is=�: i i :�J. 6�1� ;\ iq a 9t,,,,, 4 ■■ ■.....-..■■■ 'f\.,/�i:nri v,, fiul'', F s4 ii ; n'jss;„alr�i ■::n. .■:: + `!'r1;i; ' �F ifs;'::?x:i::;`'i.-�,,,,, s'd!p" y :: ■:: ■:: ,%j...,,. R 3.,G,�r:.. II m■ 11■:: �saFr 1%,-c,;: �!.wir•.4! is ■:: ■:: - g::i�'a ER TV ■■ .. — _-■n C is r,:,.;r ?ro :>,,;w:T"•7_ov.ry y .li , — ,,. iY P. ■■_•, all, Z n ■■ a ':.;. it1 6. 4'�1 n: - <-;,. >: CfIr.IH O .. __■n-■■■; ''�iC yi, A �1CCC'/ al �■ n ■■ ice,. 11• � . '':tip m a. :: m■:: m■:: °+'',+ y rn mF ii ::: 4-.:..,..'r,'Sh'-i.,.yuF.'F ii EMU �.i,:C- k °r. WM: ,411, !«{?`. 3i :: ■:: ■:: ::�s , :: ` .. �,i n ; .i.r.....,.................1‘•..1pi 1 F' , .. ... ..,.4,-,5,,e, .A .act 1' Y,;Diu:"..r..o o $ O^""_ '..rs .;t{ ti`F'.,'(:s �3�tit.l y "iw'u..�_ 1sa.. Y r'lt s''13_fir, I l.. ISM ; , f E ° �I # $ • ARCHITECTURAL DIMENSIONS UT, � CALIFORNIA a.°■° 020).,,-°°°, MAN STREET sum,>° WALNUT°R co ■°°SOUTH 9.I s § 5 o s HOMEGATE SUffES c/ =N s 8 g ?N S n e ; SW 43rd ST.&OAKESDALE AVE.SW 9 A 2 1 P m RENTON,WASHINGTON •• •IIIIIIIIIIIM —--- ------- ../••-- -- --....s.„. ••••••...._____,.......,•.••• • si 167 • ---••7".-4. • •". '-'•-- -----. \& -i -s•-••••••,....1= --------..........._ E I I snr'Id Emu , mem meo ca. 4./1••••••.:/ .•••• • ! Eli I 1 /.•-------• ' ; • ••• --)r\--n.—----- .,40?11 >. •I . PRIMP ..., ...•:::, • In. w I . \ 'a !I, SITE co Z 11,11"1 In 0 REPAID pant al . , ' i MEW ADDEPII 41 181 167 173 < cl . MD .7.• ••• - eiL I. 4,i 0 g 4,, • • v 1, 2• ..offilii'''''reamwr•••7 1 '''' •••' - 7 — g ) D os Cl) , .. „. ITERwe WED ea Lk•il ' CO a) <j " VlwrCT.INLY MAP t • ,.., 1 NORTH 4•3.• :1.: .• • < ---k.,____.„----d------- m z A-. ---_, .1.;_.,;PA ir..pC."D cal,-1::3.1:2D.P37.FP2DF2.2 1.0.=.:§11V.f,f7,D.ERTIMTDODoeg.:D.I.AF 0 11.1 -Al IA i i 00 CC E . 1 11 1 " .LIRNI-. I . 8-14-95 ;• IN 1.• iTRI—T 6.1 ...DIV.2 I 111: 5 y I, , i- • .9 . I, .,.... ' '''. --..,• . 7--.,... 1,,..-41. E, , W.0 WELT D .P.. . .q , • , .„..-E•• 131 W i PER.6.177.1.• . \ ..".............21.__________ . ii 4.1.r....... 1 1 41 fli C i4° NOR.r H 1 co-. zi.E"og,1 „os, r N 1 ,All 1 i gni • g •••••••••• , , w: 21 u-6 of N NEIGHBORHOOD • i . 4 )1t DETA,IL MAID,, _J <I NORTH II•§ D. GRAPHIC SCALE -W6 I- -, ..• WO. 207 0 t DENDIRLICIRR MR( (IN FEET) Ini WALD P.M I WM.won Hi AD KAMA PP= T,6, HG005 40 SEW WAIT Ir i DR-12 <f„DISEL7 DP • A e M&._Naels 98 128 , 125371 0010 I 125371 0050 125371 0050 SEATTLE FIRST NATIONAL BA SEATTLE-FIRST NATIONAL BA SEATTLE-FIRST NATIONAL BA Mountain Fina Copper 1301 5th Ave#3636 1301 5th Ave#3636 1301 5th Ave#3636 Seattle,WA 98101-2637 Seattle, WA 98101-2637 Seattle, WA 98101-2637 J --- - 125371 0050 362304 9032 362304 9033 SEATTLE-FIRST NATIONAL BA Renton Llc Zelman Renton Llc Zelman 1301 5th Ave#3636 707 Wilshire Blvd#3036 707 Wilshire Blvd#3036 Seattle,WA 98101-2637 Los Angeles, CA 90017-3512 Los Angeles, CA 90017-3512 < \- 362304 9042 362304 9045 362304 9045 Beth Campbell Renton Llc Zelman Renton Llc Zelman 1508 SW 43rd St 707 Wilshire Blvd#3036 707 Wilshire Blvd#3036 Renton, WA 98055-4826 Los Angeles, CA 90017-3512 Los Angeles, CA 90017-3512 L J 362304 9071 ( 362304 9086 Renton Llc Zelman BARBER ASSOCIATES 707 Wilshire Blvd#3036 7979 S 180th St Los Angeles, CA 90017-3512 j Kent, WA 98032-1051 - — -9 l � 1 I I I I I I� 1, Ijl (> - < (> - -< I � I I . I II i il � I i I II . I I I ! I II I I I I 411, IVWashington State Northwest Region Department of Transportation 15700 Dayton Avenue North Sid Morrison P.O.Box 330310 Secretary of Transportation Seattle,WA 98133-9710 (206)440-400k, Qp DATE: November 5, 1998 O� OF v7-i) TO: Mr. Peter Rosen, Project Manager kk © et` 4�` Development Services Division ®C 6 12',� J v 1055 South Grady Way cite/ Renton, WA 98055 SUBJECT: NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE, MITIGATED (DNS,M) LrU°A-98-12$„SA-A,ECF,;•SM Hromegate-Su_i'tes_-•'__ _. 11r412-SW 40Street . FROM: Robert A. Josephson, P.E., Manager of Planning& Local Cordination Washington State Department of Transportation Northwest Region 15700 Dayton Avenue North, MS 122 P.O. Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 Thank you for giving us the opportunity to review the above referenced project. Our response is checked below: We have reviewed the subject document and have no further comments. The project will have no significant impact on the state highway system. X The State recommends that a traffic study be prepared to analyze the state intersections that are impacted by ten or more of the project's generated peak hour trips and also determine what mitigation measures should be required. If you have any questions please contact Don Hurter(206-440-4664) or Don Sims (206- 440-4915) of my Developer Services office. RAJ:ds file:C:\Don\Request TIA.doc • -1 Proposed Mitigation Measures: �• - The following Mltigetion Measures win likely he Imposed en the preposed project. These recommended Mitigation Q � Measures address p oject Impacts not covered by existing codes and regulations es tlled above. • - 1.Traffic Mitigation Fee-$75 per new average daily trip attributed to proposal. 2 The applicant will be required to provide a fair share contribution toward the cost of a new traffic signal at the�•4'NT0� Intersection of SW 41st Street and Oakesdate Avenue SE. 3.Fire Mitigation Fee-$0.52 per square foot of new constoucUon. NOTICE OF APPLICATION Comments on the above application must be submitted In writing to Peter Rosen,Project Manager,Development AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION Services Division,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on September 8,1998. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mall,contact OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE,MITIGATED(DNS-M) Peter Rosen at(425)4307219.Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project CONTACT PERSON: PETER ROSEN;(425)430-7219 • DATE: August 25,1998 )PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION I LAND USE NUMBER: ,k LUA-98-128,SA-A ECF,SM APPLICATION NAME: HOMEGATE SUITES PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Proposal for a 113 room extended stay type hotel,consisting of a three-story building with a total area of 74,523 sq.It, The proposal Includes 118 parking spaces. Access Is proposed via Iwo driveways off of SW 43rd Street The proposed development Is within 200 feet of the high water mark of Springbrook Creek and therefore a Shorelines , Substantial Development Permit Is required. PROJECT LOCATION: 1412 SW 43rd Street OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED(ONS-M): As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore.as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110.the City of Renton Is using the Optional DNS(M)process to give notice that a DNS-M Is likely to be issued.Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M ate integrated Into __` / a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated(DNS-M).A 14 day appeal period will follow the Issuance of the DNS-M. — �!'=_�-.-If_�—._-7_ PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: August 18.1998 .-- yr -j f O n f.�_�..:_ NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: August 25,1998 :,wv„u° • " _ S Permits/Review Requested: SEPA,Site Plan,Shoreline Substantial Development,Building i l' .i Other Permits which may be required: None anticipated. ! ���� Requested Studies: Geotechnical Report,Traffic Impact Analysis S. 412 ... Location where application may ( yy ////�ilyyy�+��ryrA�r�stiel 5m0���.....4 1 be reviewed: PlanningisuildinglPublic Works Division,Development Services Department, tt` i G0OLIO L1 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98058 ram. 4i,� PUBLIC HEARING: No public hearing requited.Administrative review only. J► ; CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: i i' �` Analytical process I! — yy k Project consistency refers to whether a project Is consistent with adopted and applicable development regulations.or In 1 i ��•{ (2)(g)provides __ . their absence,comprehensive plan policies. RCW 38.708,110 that the Notice of Application(NOA) include a statement of the preliminary determination of a project's consistency with the type of land use,level of development,infrastructure,and character of development If one has been made al the time of notice.At a minimum, reooaa,oco g>:Te�..a� every NOA shall Include a determination of the project's consistency with the zoning,comprehensive plan and development regulations. . Land Use: Site is zoned Commercial Arterial(CA). Hotels are permitted uses in the CA zone.The proposal meats the development standards of the CA zone. Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Environmental a analysis of the Park Phase se I.Rezone,Oakesdale Business Campus and Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: The proposal will be subject to the City's SEPA Ordinance,Zoning Code regulations.Public Works Standard's.Uniform Building Code,Uniform Fire Code.etc.These adopted codes end standards will function to maigate project - Impacts. , GENMALOT.DOC • GENMALOT.DOC CERTIFICATION -__ ----- • I, fiffir Mi1 n , hereby certify that 3 copies of the above • document were posted by me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on /-A/Gu.c' 2-C/g/ ' • Signed: 0/7: ATTEST: Subcribed and sworn before me,a Nortary Public,in and f -the State of -r � Washington residing ill -►- ,on the Q1 day of� - / ..9ff . 0-4-,--t...//__. 7.(---..i....---,-,_‘A././ . MARILYN KAMCHEFF COMMISSION EXPIRES 6/29/99 ARCHITECTURAL DIMENSIONS 1600 South Moin Street, Ste.275 September 21, 1998 Walnut Creek,CA 94596-5341 James Heilbronner Architect C 11531 Mr. Peter Rosen City of Renton Planning Department 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 • Re: Homegate Suites S.W. 43' Sreet Renton, WA Dear Peter, On behalf of our client, Prime Hospitality Corporation, this letter is to formally request that our application for Site Plan Approval, Environmental Review and a Shoreline Development Permit for the above referenced project be withdrawn. At this time Prime Hospitality will not be proceeding with development of this project. We would like to thank-you for the time and effort your office has put forth in helping us through the development process to date and we look forward to working with your City in the future. Please call if you have any questions or need more information. Sincerely, A HI UR IM ONS J f y ac Adam, Project Manager • nclosures cc: Bill Updike, Prime Hospitality Angelo Stambules, Prime Hospitality Brian Callagan, DEA HG005/C-1 092198jsm fax& mail 800.452-'3477 111 Phone:925-932-8651 Fax:925.746.8744 ® E-Mail: archdim@california.com DEVELOPMENT MANNING CITY OF RENTON R D 41-3 SEP-2 1-1998 . /Y6r)/16/0 (1)14- RECEIVED . PE7 )2 RosEiv . Ko3-6-7-pr 09-66M OT: - DZ- VL Prn.OUT D(v, -- 6-WA-D w/q-Y REvu-r-ou g&S-S-- ) DE7)-f2 , 57K /, p203-62-- wo5E12. 5,4 — ft) -67r s --TD Ito n _ swr-e-S. 1nt2D6-13' 7 - 2o7 6 P 111 PkoPek flEFoCCok).)/V. L - LI6i) • • - I-5 g5L 4/3 laP Fie 6-77 YeJle____57 4ob rOD Ffigni /4:4) ) 2-11-E7 'WOPtgrY. • /H-Oci) LJL 16vb 5: AY PbE e6 CLfOWJ iv 6 472-14(O'V ove-' BriR cr()6-7, PrT CO yo TE /9-6Z_ nR_E (:oV2773s7 •tif7C--F uP ftyUIS-4-r Oro ° _ L [ vg Jc Z2± /2-k ific EgLig , /79I. -90 I 9 i1 V9 7 5- '-9(1© 7 S SO tad (1r9.9 c 6033 -.11 S 92) (_ 7)-17a ��--� 1 . `S� �� �8-© • 714 v5R---6--q-ari 9/10G .3TIL 10",ovr9 ('J O 7 o-L. G j 1J©(fl (J(2 7d (-(U s Cf- - 'JoU 'S f � �- �1 -p4i1 - °75 3 � � - I -01 .4 ti �a_ 41)/L--7 /r%P M -& A - _1mod, QL ( 7-) iM ,793 Q /4(cf-ems -P8 JO. C�' 2(1r. `7- i(r) 7rI--6124 0)0 C2'i-v 1 -& 'i I fd A mil Ed-7 50- 7 C77 OTh . 7 f o-LS . 9 0Z g s-q id 7 57i7Y,4S Q 6Ibl s_ -9 = - 59 7( W A Ok/4 ( Vd' A W SV 0-7 0 off, 5-7 9 w vu �j 1/t' / d47i L J -of I3 ti -- lj JQ -3%(-Lg 7 Q r7 a7)1 (f'/-( ?'S J(ugAL .3 7ci o9d � 9 MJ �f . () 06 . 3 711 ,17 (5:( a,--.7_,Lil -7/7 -Uf 54--1 07 !)-ID 67r11 iIntl GJC1-A 9\Q -Y7 1-1_ i_1 2D QJ a N d ALL nd Q ;/1 li GAit— 114 f City C.-__inton Department of Planning/Building/P4 ._ Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: PoU1ce. COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 8, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA 98-128,SA-A,ECF,SM DATE CIRCULATED: AUGUST 25, 1998 APPLICANT: Prime Hospitality PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen PROJECT TITLE: Homegate Suites WORK ORDER NO: 78425 LOCATION: 1412 SW 43rd Street SITE AREA: 3.11 acres I BUILDING AREA(new expansion gross): 74,523 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for a 113 room extended stay type hotel, consisting of a three-story building with a total area of 74,523 sq.ft. The proposal includes 116 parking spaces. Access is proposed via two driveways off of SW 43rd Street. S3 A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS 06 Q n ° Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Ss soreline Use Tr Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic./Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Alrport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet Estimate 38.53 police calls for service annually, based on the size of the building. The actua' number of police calls will probably be somewhat higher, due to the nature of the business . This area of Renton is victimized by the highest number of Commercial Burglaries in the City. Recommend the construction site be fenced in with portable fencing, and security lighting will need to be in place during the hours of darkness. All construction materials and tools will need to 'be secured when not in use, to help prevent theft.-. I'f 'a--.portable office trailer is used, it will need auxiliary locks on t he doors and windows , and all office machinery. and equipment will need to be secured (preferably locked down or secured to the walls and/or floor B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS with cables). Since this construction site is located in an area of the City that is isolated, it is highly probable that it will be inundated with thefts during construction'. The applicant should seriously consider the use of private security guards or off-duty police officers to exclusively patrol the site during off-hours. The hotel itself will need electronic locks on each room door to help prevent burglary. The Nendel 's Hotel on East Valley Road has been plagued in the past with burglary of guest rooms and robbery during the hours of darkness , as well as thefts from customer's vehicles in the parking lots . Recommend a closed-circuit-tv that monitors the reception desk, to aid in identification of suspects should a robbery occur at this business. Also recommend a drop-safe C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS that is secured 'to the floor, so employees working the reception desk donot have excess cash in cash registers. The parking lot 'will need extra security lighting to help prevent auto thefts and thefts from customer vehicles. We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signa re of Director or uthorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 City_. ._enton Department of Planning/Building/PL:___Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: -r ,ah� COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 8, 1998 poiAPPLICATION NO: LUA-98-128,SA-A,ECF,SM DATE CIRCULATED: AUGUST 25, 1998 APPLICANT: Prime Hospitality PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen PROJECT TITLE: Homegate Suites WORK ORDER NO: 78425 Cy?., LOCATION: 1412 SW 43rd Street 1U' SITE AREA: 3.11 acres I BUILDING AREA(new expansion&css): 74,52 q. 11 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for a 113 room extended stay type hotel, consisting of a three-storyl ui4ing with a Th al area of 74,523 sq.ft. The proposal includes 116 parking spaces. Access is proposed via two driveways off of SW 43t'd Etjeet. ,wolf A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information impacts impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics _ Water LighVGlate Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS g e e c` a.c IM PJt2 -��v^ i T i °1 T ► -P e G. fi C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. C� G 1-'19 2 / 51 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative/ Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 HOMEGATE SUITES 1412 SW 43rd St. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Development Services September 3, 1998 TRANSPORTATION: 1. The transportation mitigation fee is $42,150. This amount due when the construction permit is issued. 2. The fair share amount to be contributed for a future traffic signal at Oakesdale Ave. SW and SW 41st St. is 0.31 percent or$310. 3. The applicant is to be advised that the construction of a future Railroad Under Crossing approximately 800-feet from the site may have some short term impact to there future operations due to the construction of a temporary detour bypass. 98cm118T • 98CM118T.DOC\ \ A &eC5- Adr4114i.F.5.f:1'..'1.':::.,' . • + 11(.1iR + r .iisn, yy,(jY.r�� •.�7�' ! L'jY:.W, '?t�"' 'J:eHs'10..+!• :'' ..K/.H:? !.vx.i.wlp„ V. ,.�i+4E'! c•/ RS.. } .6Y M X '( }} •f iTI Y �,�Y�, .._ �..:{ Gar-+"4y`h,3K.<:Y.,`-;rji.'?.'-(S•r r-r-<�s..nno-,+ �.r,..;ow:w4.a:`•-.../.isT,%Y... ,r,►�r'k,►:,R...., .,»;r�..KwE�4•ww 1•,[: L .. .-' Project Name Howteci a(C (Jot:le Hate Project Address 1412. S w i 3rd S Contact Pe son Tom Atli 4o0 Address Phone Number (a25 ) - c3I — S 6 5 I • Permit Nu ber L. U A.- qt S - 12$ Project Description I l3 room Gh-ictirdd srtuci -tiic 1iotc 1 -t•o A, ccv-eu 4 .71-1 , .523 s.- (3 s lot! 1'>14 ) Land Use Type: • Method of Calculation: prrpuvea Ill 0 Residential ❑ ITE Trip Generation Manual �,t�.., 4IAc o IvLc 0 -etail 0/Traffic Study , a Non-retail ❑ Other A`41 r k i$ Calculation: r-v, -tve,176e.c s7`c447 - A ve vale —,fl , TADS - 562. 0(4i1ly v,Ps • r fi-t t75 ig..14 drip • - ( 475) (562 ) — $ 142 15 0_ •• • Transportation Mitigation Fee: /42 150. °c) Calculated by: 1 v�f Wall --- 1/� Date: At^y 26 Ill 8 Account Nu-nber: 105.. 5QR. 31S0, 70. 00. Date of Payment } City_..Anton Department of Planning/Building/Pt Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: I lave. Reuteti W COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 8, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-128,SA-A,ECF,SM DATE CIRCULATED: AUGUST 25, 1998 APPLICANT: Prime Hospitality PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen PROJECT TITLE: Homegate Suites WORK ORDER NO: 78425 LOCATION: 1412 SW 43rd Street SITE AREA: 3.11 acres I BUILDING AREA(new expansion gross): 74,523 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for a 113 room extended stay type hotel, consisting of a three-story building with a total area of 74,523 sq.ft. The proposal includes 116 parking spaces. Access is proposed via two driveways off of SW 43rd Street. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water (/� Light/Glate Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Histor c/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS P7-0 ra,4(e. p act 14-1-cKj h 'h-a Ar 2 al-e-c —) Gt,-#aC4,e, C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this'application with particular attention to those areas In which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to property assess this proposal. 5ept• / ? Signature of Director or Authorized Represen ve Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10193 HOMEGATE SUITES 1412 SW 43rd St. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Development Services September 3, 1998 WATER(Issues): 1. The Water System Development Connection Charge is$0.113 per square feet of gross site area, (but not less than$850). Therefore,the connection fee is$ ! 4 f v,0,2 2. One(1) fire hydrant is required for each 1000 gpm of required fire flow. Fire Prevention indicates a required fire flow of 3000 gpm. Therefore,three(3)hydrants require. 3. 'The proposed fire flow line of 8-inch in a loop water system will only provide 2,500 gpm. A 101-inch water loop main will provide 4,000 gpm of fire flow. Therefore, a 10-inch loop main be required. 4. The loop water main will be required in a 15-foot utility easement. 5. FlJor elevation needs to be shown on the utility plan for water. 6, a water main passing the North West corner of the building must have a minimum clearance of 10-feet from the foundation footing of the building. 7. Pr posed plans to meet City of Renton drafting standards. Plan size is 22 x 34. 8. Show vertical profile on Construction Plans. 9. The irrigation meter and backflow prevention device location to be shown on the water plan shet. 10. e domestic water service requires a backflow prevention device if the building is over 30-feet in I eight. 98cm118 • 98CM118W.DOC\ City cectenton Department of Planning/Building/Pi3r. Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET I REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: queks COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 8, 1998 I APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-128,SA-A,ECF,SM DATE CIRCULATED: AUGUST 25, 1998 APPLICANT: Prime Hospitality PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen PROJECT TITLE: Homegate Suites WORK ORDER NO: 78425 LOCATION: 1412 SW 43rd Street SITE AREA: 3.11 acres I BUILDING AREA(new expansion gross): 74,523 sq.ft. I SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for a 113 room extended stay type hotel, consisting of a three-story building with a total area of 74,523 sq.ft. The' roposal includes 116 parking spaces. Access is proposed via two driveways off of SW 43rd Street. 1 A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major information Environment Minor Major information Impacts impacts Necessary impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants _ Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health I Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources _ Preservation Airport Environment. 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet 7 CuCIZ teji -ems/ . z p ' B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS • /9Z/ 6(71,'J S/ � > 2r� 7 -P/� L�'//'z‘.0 76 „ �- cr,� ruGdcL° a� md 'G�J'ic4.t' c✓� G -, 0/2a ' inv /li/z�� l .3. 4), 4 /� ? , end C-z-)--)c_V/Z)f-76- e.t.41,jd-eL, 740 a ' .ten ct'tvo may` ��E --7 /--e17 C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTSG C 3 Cl; a2-7 C _ Diu �ir�Gam - 7b i We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas In which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed roperly assess this proposal. 1 ) 01 9S ig�o Dior A ed Representative Datp DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 i (Continued) NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER Applicant Certification 1 I, y a i Lak.l �ti , hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property (Print Name) dOOtl owners and their addresses were obtained from: D City of Renton Technical. Services Records D Title Company Records 0 King County Assessors Records Signed Date qig.6 lic t (A PP p ) NOTARY ATTESTED: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public,in and for the State of Washington, residing'af0, ' ,1 on the( day of C ± , 19 'r. Signed C----1720,Ac n-72t 4( (Notary ublic) MARILYN AMCHEFF ::::::::.::::::::::.....................:.:.�:.::::::........................::.:::::G. ...TfF...1.0ATI.QN..OF:.NtA1LIN , J. ., ': hereby certify that notices of e propo sed applicatio:.:»::;:n:wer'e mailed to :.:: th . ........ • ATTEST Subscribed and sworn before me,a Notary Public in:::and for the State of Washin o IE res.idin.9:: :.;.:..:;;:::..>:>>:: . >:: ::::.::: ::::.:: :::::.. .....;:<.;:::.;::::::::. :: :: >;>:.:..:.:::.:.;:.:. n the:.: .. a...tl#W6f;.::.:;:: ::. :. :::.::::::::::.;::.:.::;:.;:.;: :.::.: ::::::;;:..iii;;:.;:.:.;:: r... 9. listprop.doc r ti REV 07/95 MARILYN KAMCHEFF f 2 COMMISSION EXPIRES 6/29/99 1253710010 125371 0050 125371 0050 SF,ATTL FIRST NATTIONAL BA SEATTLE-FIRST NATIONAL BA SEATTLE-FIRST NATIONAL BA Iv,�untain Fina Coppe• 1301 5th Ave#3636 1301 5th Ave#3636 1301 5th Ave#3636 i Seattle, WA 98101-2637 Seattle,WA 98101-2637 Seattle,WA 98101-2637 125371 0050 362304 9032 362304 9033 SEATTLE-FIRST N IONAL BA Renton Llc Zelman Renton Llc Zelman 1301 5th Ave#3636 707 Wilshire Blvd#3036 707 Wilshire Blvd#3036 . Seattle, WA 98101-2637 Los Angeles, CA 90017-3512 Los Angeles, CA 90017-3512 362304 9042 362304 9045 362304 9045 Beth Campbell Renton Lie Zelman Renton Llc Zelman 1508 SW 43rd St 707 Wilshire Blvd#3036 707 Wilshire Blvd#3036 Renton,WA 98055-4826 Los Angeles, CA 90017-3512 Los Angeles, CA 90017-3512 362304 9071 362304 9086 Renton Lie Zelman BARBER ASSOCIATES 707 Wilshire Blvd#3036 7979 S 180th St Los Angeles, CA 90017-3512 Kent, WA 98032-1051 .,r •i I.5.,`; \' n,2....i:..::\rs:�:'}?F:<;�:^a�\�•\\\v .�.':.�}::i•.,«)\`\\ \ {\y2:+;iia\tr+��:v?vG::.<,:i ti;4.,::.;,?..`)i+',•;?:�i .\`\\,a w,`:.r:!•]•}:}}•r,..;}.r:r::..:nr n. i..X.,.a..h..♦�a. t3?.,�;...r<,aZ.}.\� \`1�;22 .�.,,,.,.Z ah4\..•YA:.;..,..rr•.r:... :.;hC:4::2:v:.:}•,\`4\\;}�:•�\:\�222:,�:a�........ ..~'J,♦ t•.:-:n„ :V.:Z}::::,h i*i:?,`h\\ ♦a . K�� \2a wa .,aG 2{?:;:<IMiii Fu2::::;.::::.;;.::::.:-::]:.�}}..:a\. }n�,.v,♦,aun:..;.... �'•. ` :v}•}`r:].>,t7.:+:•]:4:::........\.:., ..:...2.. tt\h�i t\..t\4t! Syt � +K\ {„G'•:tt ti•::•;?n..,,, ..�h.}..�\n;t... ,\\t` 'iC a?•`?�•a� a,v.,t,v-:aY .as..v-.v ....�.ns-:•.ant,v ...a•.,:].•u,}. ... v.,.,.....n•::.v].a:.: .v...n:n.......n....t n\M\. .a. ....:r..]....v ..,a:.. ...n.......v.v::}T4�r!,Sti '�$ +w• V.vavm n........•v.........n.,.,,.:..uu........... n.....� ..x...\......... t 2t, ..n.........�..............................: :.:.::....:.:..:i!t.v::::is•:i{:::::::::.?::a:;•::n:::.. ,, �{ n•.,...t r. •:::.. .. ....::.vv..........:.:::n:Y.?;+ -:^};i:i:i:j'.j:iv ., .SC2;\.,at.:..m.... .......:::.v.:....n..........•.:.n..........:.,.,..n...]. n�v v:.t......:n:v........h\4\`4.,w::n.,.;.:...:v..:.......v::::v::.v:: :v ::. : :::.v::::: ....... ......:...... ....:::..::......... .... A •.�S;.a,nnw.vn•.v w:•:na}.v::w....-.;...v.v:v.. •4vaw::::v::Jv:}:., vx\` \.! .. .n.............. nan:.............v........nn :.. ......... n..n....vv \ ....,.an..... ....;..•w::,v..:..;.:•;.;:...... ,iiiY.!•i}i};i•r}?>i}};?22•}•} :s'<}}}}}iii:riv;2ti: ..a.,a• .,.,;shy...:...::•:::::::.at]::.:.n..�::.�:r-.,`..{•:.�:::::::.,-:s.,,•:::.; ,..x ...r.�::::-.:}}n, .h.....,.::h•::::•]:::�}}::::.:•• ......... ]:� }h,Na::?}�"�$:h..:.:v. ...v.v::::.:v-.v:...:...:...:. \A\. •} h:,v..:n....h v.,..::..\,. •Rvw:v::::}...t............ .... t , , .hw:::::tv:. .............:.... .......v.v::.........vt:v:........v.::..v., .. .::.v.t:.......::...nv..:.t.:;:.....vv. .,C,avaw.M..4t,a.::}{!:F!:w:nta•n:a:.v+!:vv•i.a:v•.r•:Ni i$jiiiiii:`v;`t\♦ ,hv.v.nv]r}.v,..v,.avnn,,.a....,\\`�`\..n.,.h n.......... ....... • ........ ...r. ....... • ... .:]..::::,.:::..::..]:..w.• v:vr}, :•v.-•:•.v:::v::v.,a}}:.:;..••}r.w:w.;;w...:•v♦♦, .:......v�....� ........... r................. • ♦ .... ...n:r.•:.... t.. ..v..v..av:}...:a,aunt•}i}}n:.vn.,na,Nh�w• vvvw:v,v.•{•}i}X�{J},.::•}.-:::.i:........ r:{{a}•:: .....v:;{:}:::. ..... '.J:}]:°: .v\v:.`n\1-.`n,:{vvY::• -i-::!.::•!vii:: .............,,:.... ... }...,................................... ..n...a..:nv.......... ...n.. .:;........ .. n„< ....t> ....!"- :::•:v:;+n......::...:w.v.\w:n,:. .a,. AsT � .. t.. ::: •:::. �•.,v: �ii:.. • �.+h a\}hv.v...h• ....., a,:!MLv.:f.vt ."'\ate :'\ : j4:::yii a by .;..v.::..:v:.`nw:n:••;,v:.v:n:.t•.:v'n:•vn.i•`i. v' O.\ •{}: }} •v .? ..v:::}::^ah"il\\'22`v'F\•.r.:.,n.w•na n r tiL�ti:tits:�>�:'�•.�•:♦- ti+:ti ..WCf^ta,,,' „v\\,}?:"{{:at{x•:J:iv ah-}}.......r::4:v.r. i' •, •.• ,t ....V..n...::.......... v.v...... .v:•v•.:...,..; .. � 4 t v:v:•. u.a,. ... ... .. {.. n ::..n::n:w .a.,::4:iK:.�:�'tt��:'...:`•2}•::::`::::Y':, J.....;s,��t r ..};. .....:..,,at....,r....::..,.:♦ w.a„ -.•.,.{.}...,n..;-.--. \\.a �.♦ '::.....aat.:.:i•:.a....... :�:wv. .♦....... .... ]::!>%�.\iar}.aa,,,n�. ]}•s:<�:}••}}x�:}:.}}:•}.»r..:.,;...::••:::...,...::........t..t. \...4tt4}.r....•.t}rr.n.,aa 4 a. ;a4.]ht. . ...,•.: .Z .. ..:.......,... -w•:. •,.,..aa................a•:.�2a ..r..... \ ... ........,{.a;...tt:•::}:.::::•...................... ....... ......... .. :aa•. ..}:.,•,h::::}\...vvw::::vw:•x:;:..vv ::::::::::::::.....:::::}:::::...:: :.v::•..}y—..�: ..:.� :: .• 4} �.Ybx \h' v`{:vviw•:•v.'-a.•.v:...,.n.r..,N.v:`::•:..,w:.:v vr}�vv •nvv..v:::::.w:}}?:}}nv}}} \.� : 4v:...w::........n.v...:....n...a............... ............... .............i4'.,•.1'. � ::•%.:�% `t ::... .]}. .!h}:{L}:{•}:.,. ......}:^:4;{::n•....•a. .v........v t.}'ju..........- t:•:uv^ht�nn♦ .vnvv.n.n..., ..... :..\ i.....}:r . ... .>. .r..;. v.....r::..�..:..:..r:...::..•;:•.,a„•�.:!t;:•]}:i � :,.a..•.a .a •�.,.f•.;:r:............at., .-• ,n•- .. .......! ,,. .. :i»:::}>�r ..a .\iih`R\ a:?,ttt...,v..w.v.,... x.v.....,....n :.:::..yr !q .:::..:. \.. .w......:.:....:.�::.. -:..:::.:}:•.t•.�n•:.,•:.t•:.:aa..a•.t.:::.:-:.,.•:}h a „t,t•:::.:,...a..:. .n a .-....ta.. .,.:..::.:,,..:::::::t:..�.�n.:n.... .:.::::::::.......:::........... ..:...... .... : .�At,-..: ...:::: : .: hi. ota,,..a„♦aaay,,...:.u..,,,r,,.... ...... .... .... nS> .... ,<...u,..aa. �.\aa,,.,,.,:......,...a,tt. .. ... ..... .:.:.a...... . ......... : nu.,.:..4v: r::isn w:. }:: ; . . .:. 4n....x ...}.\ : n:... .::i. ]v .:. :•v:.}:vg 4v..::::..:...::n. ..n n n . . .............t..,a >nn.v.:,:...:n „..-.. v.,........ ..y . hyv:.v }}} title t :a . . . .::wv •:n o .t:.:t : •::' } }}•:•:-} *:.*: i • : 1 , , i . n . yt . tv ...�, " r::„.,i •h•::::::::;} : i : 1na. theres iiicrt1P:rAbna agwi,ne,pussaratsc: s �sadLaia�" ;uaanza�1astekkkonfctt .is .. .n ner::. . . . .. . .. .. . . PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: NAME: . Mr. Paul Casey - . •Homegate' Suites Hotel • • Zelman Renton, LLC •• . PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION: • 1*12, SW 3Vd s- e' ADDRESS: 707 Wilshire Blvd. , tt3036 S.W. 43rd St../W of Oakesdale Ave SW • KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): CITY: Los Angeles ZIP: 90017 CA 362f3-049045-0 TELEPHONE NUMBER: EXISTING LAND USE(S): • 213-533I=8120 t^!4% • Vacant • PROPOSED LAND USES: NAME:. Bill U• pdike I Hotel • COMPANY (If applicable): • EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: Prime Hospitality Commercial ADDRESS: 3033' N. 44th St. , Suite 375 PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): N/A CITY: Phoenix, AZ ZIP: 85058 •" ' EXISTING ZONING: •• '- CA (Arterial Commercial) 4:1„,i fF• ptiggg; IUMHER: t PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable):, • I, 602-954-1776 , #31 i :.a:�:-;.y•r`'.:;:::�}:::;•-;-}:::-2]:>.}:.}:{.}:.�i.}„-,•: {!::; .,•::r:;!::.::.�::.,;.•: n:;•]t:•:.i:-:•:•}::•:i•?2;}:a}<:::::}::sy«>}:r;:U::>::>: '"`}� .flD'N•TAGT FERS€M ']n22:i>;trn:]}:-.J•::. N/A ''; .. '. I SITE AREA (SQ. FT. OR ACREAGE): NAME: TOM Wilson y, 131 , 841 SQ. FT. COMPANY (if applicable): PROJECT VALUE: ..'.'Architectural Dimensions z $6 , 000 , 000 . 00 ADDRESS: ';,1 6 0 0 S . Main S t. , Ste. 275 IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? 'fF4 No . CITY: Walnut Creek ZIP: 94596 CA IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA? TELEPHONE NUMBER: No 925-931-8651 '". ,* \\��•iax{•rx•}}}::{{{;o:}},:•ti}•{j. "k }:�:{•: .a Y : < 2rri:R } Rry > itt [ :2 , v vti : :.• v : ESC ef f • ' Attached ' Ili • • ':"•:iivh:,u.;;:::iv:�:i•:i4i:^:w.:v: :a:::i} ::h .,.v:w::}::::.r:v.. }}}:.v%•::::v:}:is•:v:::;::::::::v:v :::::::: :v�: :. • v. •}_ v �, .:• .�:. .:.�:.�::.... •...::::w:•:::;;.:::::::}:::.:::::::.::::::::::::............ vxi%ei:i::;}ii};4}i:{i{i i•' ilii{i{{{•::•:{•:{:{ .ii:•i iigiRivii�{'}:i'::: 4}:?bi-n r: a�':i:}�;:�j'4:ri<tiitiv�ii:>.!:iiiSi:::?$?ti�.v:v'•::}: w::::•}ij'iiri':4:i�iii::ti;:ri:tii}i'iiitiv:::{i ii:i!titii::ii:::iG:}{.`•%tii:jiii'vi+.::i;j$�:i$ii :;{:;iiiivi'iji�:>.i::�;:;}:;::jii ;{ii ;?:�v :tnti( ............ .. }...r.........::ia}:{•}{v:•:.:{{i}ii}'•::{i}:}}:iy:•:i:{i} ., ..:i:......... :.... a............. : ..w:... .....::v....... ....,}::vi:{.ri.,}.,w.:Y++:is{i.::: •X{ti:'•}i ::.}:.,::f,:�.;;i.:.. .;.a.,:.:; a,..... �:,::•::.:�:.: ............ Cie 7@i: 1t:i• •}.::_�::.�:::.:::.,.::::::....;.::.::::..............................::.,.:..P..P:::::....::�:.::::{.:... : ��.{;that,\�.. � >:.:i:{�i, ...:�staff::�Tll.:: � r ..} ; :::::,.::_::::::.,:..,.::::.�:i:.i:'::::::.{.}::. R.........................1 P.. ..........r'f................::::::..:,::: :. �.::mike,.:fe:esv::::::......:..........:: ......: ..„.„.> _ANNEXATION $ SUBDIVISION: _ COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT $ _REZONE $ _ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ — SPECIAL PERMIT $ . . _ SHORT PLAT $ • _TEMPORARY PERMIT $ _TENTATIVE PLAT $ _CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ PRELIMINARY PLAT $ • X SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ _ FINAL PLAT $ • _GRADE & FILL PERMIT $. (NO. CU. YDS: • ) • PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ _VARIANCE • $ (FROM SECTION: ) . —• PRELIMINARY _WAIVER $ FINAL i _WETLAND PERMIT $ — ROUTINE VEGETATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ :•- _ MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ . • • _ BINDING SITE PLAN $ ' SHORELINE REVIEWS: XSUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ • _ CONDITIONAL USE $ .. _VARIANCE $ _ EXEMPTION $No Charge X ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ REVISION $ -' I, (Print Name)Pau,/ T ease , declare that I am (please check one) the owner of the property involved in this applicati&t/it I authorized representative to act for th6 property owner (please attach proof of authorization), and that the foregoing statements and ,,j, contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge end belief. `x Zelman Renton, LLC, '` T v , I By: Zelman Industrial Partners, Inc. r i; "' By: Paul T. Casey, V.P. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Pu iia,1,9 Oda,ti for the State ofr� ri t- Calif. residing at 4.:ti Q F ` (Name of Owner/Representative) T.r AngP1 PR , an the nthay of �— E �' N E �r / August 19 98. . o .. 0,U � . ram �' U Z > ( ignature of Own `epresentative) 111— .C.,, (- 1- r I • (Sig ature of Notary tic) 1 I_ . . 4 • I .i : z %y , �f %:2'•� �� {•`.'��Yr %''s# i'•y�y` %# `•i5fi% {�?:? Y�<�> y"� 'i ��'•i : :%,�., ...,,:< } ''•::2: f<':: 2•'s><;;:.:t::•:::::::; :�3::5: ;:G.... :.:. r... ....... ............. .n M...v,.{:•iiilli:•:X::::•:::�::::.:...::.:::}..........................nw::::•}::::':::i:'•.. } .{. :. is .. ........:.......... .. }..�::::' (Th r�.t ....�.....mpleted.{f3..::.0 .:.S.taff :.:.:�: ::::::::,.... ..:: .�::.:,....:.,.....:.�:.:... l >sC ii N•uinb Kingpiiimilio :..::............ �.....P .aFF...,F.':.1�:}:: •:.M1?•;};::�,?�'-�.}<}::SA-�>:>::,SHPL-.,:.,:: .. :.:-. .::i.;•. ..... .�::.. � : ::::::. >:::::.•:= >::>:::: �<: :::}:i::�_�::>::::. ;:::_:.. ..Ff. ........ ... ... .:. . ,A ...S�I:-I.PL.1-I,::.:.SP:{.:isSiM:.;.;i.Sh�E;::.<..T..F':..V,:.A.::.:;:�- :•:::tl.,.H<;::.:.�N .. • ..ALE .. . .... :0:.}'. ': '> :<:.. '> ••� ...r...... . ............................. . ..... :::..�:.:::..;; ,r: .LP. 5TA . . . . .>..:... :.:... .. .... .....:....:.}.:.. .. .... ..... .. ..................... MASTERAP.DOC REVISED 8/97 _ __ ; TUE 15:08 FAX 253 922 9781 DAVID EVANS&ASSOCIATES _ --_ R1004 F. rg A.L,TA COIN SCHEDULE A (Caatinued) + OY a m &z.: rder No.: 514434 ` our No.: LUJIMI/a+� eorr LEGAL DLSCRIITION wqtrarr (Paragraph 4 of Schedule A continuation) E:° THE WEST 300 FEET OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY: Ir. :1': PARCEL 1: THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, t^. WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING ON THE NORTH LINE OF THE COUNTY ROAD AT A POINT WHICH IS 943.04 FEET EAST AND 30 PEET NORTH OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF HENRY ADAMS DONATION LAND CLAIM NO 43 IN SAID TOWNSHIP AND RANGE; THENCE NORTH 03949'00" EAST 495.8 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE CENTERLINE OF THE DRAINAGE DITCH; THENCE, ALONG SAID DITCH LINE. SOUTH 66°03'0O" WEST 200.93 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 409.46 FEET To THE NORTH LINE OF SAID COUNTY ROAD; a THENCE EAST, ALONG SAID ROAD LINE, 258.85 FEET TO POINT OF BEGINNING; 4" EXCEPT RIGHT OF WAY FOR SAID DRAINAGE DITCH; AND 4' •,r,:,EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF CONDEMNED IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE _ t,: NUMBER 81-2-08 17-7 FOR WIDENING OF S.W. 43RD STREET. PARCEL 2; a• .: THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH. RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHXNGTON, DESCRIBED A5 FOLZOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE NORTH SIDE OF S.W. 43RD STREET WHICH IS 943.04 FEET EAST OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF HENRY ADAMS DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 43, IN SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASRINGT'ON; `. THENCE EAST 351,04 FEET. ALONG THE NORTH SIDE OF SAID STREET; rt' THENCE NORTH 562.16 FEET TO SPRING BROOK SLOUGH DRAINAGE DITCH NO. 1; THENCE WESTERLY. ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF SAID DITCH, 334.12 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF A 5-ACRE TRACT DEEDED TO WINSTON AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 580 OF �_. DEEDS, PAGE 207, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON: '~ THENCE SOUTHERLY, ALONG SAID LINE, 472.1 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; '-' EXCEP?' THAT PORTION THEREOF CONDEMNED IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NUUMBER 81-2-081 -1-7 FOR WIDENING OF E.W. 43RD STREET. (THIS LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS DRAWN EASED ON A PRELIMINARY SKETCH PROVIDED TO THE COMPANY AND IS NOT TO BE USED $'OR PURPOSES OF CLOSING. WE ARE UNABLE. TO DETERMINE THAT THE BOUNDARIES WILL MATCH THE FINAL SHORT PLAT AND THIS DESCRIPTION WIL.4. BE AMENDED UPON REVIEW OF THE FINAL SHORT PLAT.) C TITLE ... 6A1Sin ial• DEVELOPMENT lTYOFRENTON PLANNING "..::,!. AUG 18 1998 E .,EIVE THE ZELMAN COMPANIES 707 WI(SHIRE BOULEVARD, SUITE 3036 • LOS ANGELES, CA 90017 •TELEPHONE (213) 533-8100 • FAX (213) 533-8118 August 11, 1998 • Ms. Jana Huerter City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Former Sterne() Site Renton, Washington Dear Ms. erter: This letter si all authorize Paul T. Casey to execute the Submissions and Applications on behalf of Zelman Re ton, LLC. Sincerely, ZELMAN '7NTON, LLC By: ZELMAN INDUSTRIAL PARTNERS, INC. By: Brett M. Foy Vice President BR/am cc: Ben Reiling Paul T. Casey DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON AUG 18 1998 buif/Iwerter renton 0205 2 RECEIVED ZELMAN DEVELOPMENT CO. ZELN}AN INDUSTRIAL PARTNERS, INC. ZELMAN RETAIL PARTNERS,INC. A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION .,r A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION ,r' ARCHITECTURAL DIMENSIONS August 13, 1998 1600 South Main Street, Ste. 275 Walnut Creek,CA Mr. Peter Rosen 94596-5341 City of Renton, Current Planning Division James Heilbronner 1055 South Grady Way ArchitectC 11531 Renton, WA 98055 ■ Re: Homegate Suites — Project Narrative S.W. 43rd St. Dear Peter, The following is a summary and description of the proposed project: • The site is located approximately 800 feet west of Oakesdale Avenue S.W. on S.W. 43`d Street in the Oakesdale Industrial Park. Our site has a gross area of 135,582 square feet, 3.11 acres, but has a "no build" easement which encompasses 19,499 square feet. The net site area is therefore 116,083 square feet, or 2.66 acres. • The site is currently vacant, but was formerly used for a variety of industrial purposes including a recycling yard for automotive dismantling. There are no existing structures on the site. • Springbrook Creek runs along the rear, or northerly, portion of the site. There is a 50' wide "No build" easement measured from the high water mark of the creek. This high water mark and 50' easement has been shown on the proposed site plan. • This project will have no adverse impact upon the views of the neighboring structure. The properties to the North and East are currently vacant, to the south is S.W. 43rd Street and there is a single family residence to the west. This residence is set back over 100 feet from our building and is visually screened by mature trees with heights of approximately 60 feet. • The proposed project is a 3 story/113 room "extended stay" type hotel with a total area of 74,523 square feet. The height of the main roof is approximately 39'-0", with a tower element that is 50'-0" in height at the front elevation. The lot coverage is 24, 271 square feet, which is 18% of the gross site area. With a parking requirement of 1 space per room, and one space for each employee, we will require 116 spaces (113 rooms x 1 space per room + 4 employees/2 spaces per every 3 employees = 116 spaces). We have provided 116 spaces that include 5 handicapped accessible spaces and 20 compact spaces. Access to the property consists of two driveways off S.W. 43rd Street which are spaced 200' apart, and which will both have unlimited turning movements into and out of the site. Please contact our office if you have any questions or require additional information. Sincerely, I DEVELOPMENT PLANNING TECTU AL DIMENSI N 4,4 CITY OF RENTON AUG 1 8 1998 e ac Adam RECEIVED / 0 1 98jsm2 800-452-3477 IIII Phone:925-932-8651 Fax:925-746-8744 E-Mail: archdim@california.com ■ ARCHITECTURAL DIMENSIONS August 13, 1998 1600 South Main Street, Ste. 275 Walnut Creek,CA 94596-5341 Mr. Peter Rosen James Heilbronner City of Renton, Current Planning Division ArchitectC 11531 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Re: Homegate Suites — Construction Mitigation Description S.W. 43rd St. Dear Peter, The following is a description of the Construction Mitigation for the proposed project: • Based upon the current schedule we anticipate a construction schedule from February to October 1999, dependent upon the weather. • The construction hours will generally range from 7:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. At this time we do not anticipate any specialty hours for construction and/or hauling. • Hauling and Transportation to and from the site will occur along S.W.43rd Street, Oakesdale Avenue S.W., and Highway 181. • During construction, frequent watering of the site will be implemented for dust control. An erosion control plan prepared by the Civil Engineer will be submitted for approval with the remainder of the construction documents. All equipment including generators and engines will have mufflers installed to minimize noise levels. Any dirt/mud, which may be tracked from the site along city streets, will be cleaned periodically during construction on an as-needed basis. • We do not anticipate any road improvements along S.W. 43rd Street, but will use acceptable industry practices with barricades, cones and flag persons during any construction in the right-of-way. Please contact our office if you have any questions or require additional information. Sincerely, ARCHITECT L DIMENSIONS J f ac Adam, Project Manager DEVELOPMENT PLANNING 081398jsm CITY OF RENTON AUG 1 8 1998 RECEIVED 800-452-3477 1.1 Phone:925-932-8651 Fax:925-746-8744 1.1 E-Mail: archdim@california.com Et • • • {?::ly}}}}iL:•:4::•'• is:y; i:•:.i:•:8:4:•}:??: .....}}:4::$:•:•.`•:?:: {4:6J!L�-i}}:•i:?:}}:ii}} iiiiiIIM }}:Fi{:i}i;:?;%:i};}}:;ji.}}:'i}:i:•}if:}}}}}}:•}}}:•}i}i;.}}i:4;.ti}:•}:^:, •.•}}•• i}::i:::ti:::•:jti:;iiv. ................................................:......... ..\:}:•• ri:`+ is :�\i::i>.?:'i<iL}:;:isii:;}:::::iii!4'ri;;�i::isij<S:ii::isi::.:';i;::;i:::::::::::i::S:i:i:<}:S:it::L?:ij:�i:.....:. •i:{<:i:;i}i::Y 2S':��:i'$ii:???iti'`?>:}:ij:i}:{:•:i:(4:}::::{::i:•i•i••iii:•••••i•••••fJ`?:••''•......_ _•....: • • ENVIRONMENTAL:i'r;:i ��. .. �•�}>••�•••.` :G:ti4�`4::•+ry:: !:}jjL;ti':j :::::n••.••}}•:?:?•;�'::.v n.:.-:::::•;.}.}:.}':nxv:::.v::v?::•:4':<:4'??4F:L•::•:Y-}}::i}:v:{•}}}:'n}��}:::.}}}}}:•:}'.;ir.::}•.i:0••}}Y•}': li 11.1.111111111.118N— PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact. Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency'identify impacts from your proposal (and tol reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use•this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, •write "do not know" or"does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. • Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. • The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to , . explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. • USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal,'-' "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON AUG 18 1998 RECEIVED • • Environmental Checidist • A. BACKGROUND • • 1. • Name of proposed project, if applicable: • Homegate Suites - .• . • 2. Name of applicant:. • Prime Hospitality Corporation 3: Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Bill Updike (602) 954-1776 Ext. 31 3033 N. 44th St. , Suite 375 • Phoenix AZ 85058 4. Date checklist prepared: 8/13/98 5. Agency requesting checklist: Planning division 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Construction to start February 1999 and end October 1999. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. 1) Stemco Property, Cleanup Action Plan, prepared for Zelman Renton,LLC 6/30/97 by Hart Crowser, Earth & Environmental Technologies. File J-4735. * 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. 1) Yes.- Oakesdale Business Park - Phase I - Grading & Storm Drainage. Plan, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, B.C.E. Job #5911 . 2) Lot line ad iustment - Ba.rahauen .Encrineers 10.. List any governmen approvals or permits matwinbe nee or your proposal, if known. • Not Known. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of- the project and site. See project narrative submitted with Site Plan Approval. * 2) Final Supplemental Remedial Investigation (SRI) / Supplemental Feasibilty Study (SPS) , Sternco Property, Renton,WA Prepared by Zelman Renton,LLC by Hart Crowser, Earth & Environmental Technologies, 7/2/97 (Rev) File J-4735. 2 Environmental Checidiat 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for'a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, Including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occurover a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a. legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this • checklist. • • See Site Plan Approval Submittal. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, • other Flat with some slopes . • b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) 25% +/- c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you.know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Clean fill - SW, SP Soils. :. , See Soils Report d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading . proposed. Indicate source of fill. . - - .. .. Fill to make ground surface for final grades . Will be temporarily placed as soil preload on building footprint. • f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Yes.- Will be mitigated with actions detail on T.E. S.C. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project • construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 7,0% h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: King County Approved T.E. S.C. measures . 3 • Environmental Checklist 2. AIR • a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Dust and equipment emissions during construction, automobile emissions during operation, normal emissions for business • use of a hotel. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. N/A. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: None. 3. WATER a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate,.state what stream or river it flows into. SPringbrook Creek. 2). Will the project require any.work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet).the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Yes.— 50ft. high water line, setback will be observed except for landscape activities (planting) . • 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. • No. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year flood plain? If"so, note location on the site plan. Yes.— 100 year flood plane is 'contoured to 50ft. setback area. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. 4 Environmental Checklist b. Ground Water:. • 1) • .Will ground water be'withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description;'purpose; and approximate quantities if known. No. • 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None. c. Water Runoff(including storm water): 1) , Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters, If so, describe. Surface runoff of stormwater is to be collected in surface drainage structures — valley &curb gutters — these flows are tributory to Oakesdale Business Park system & to Springbrook 2) Could waste material enter ground or surface.waters? If so, generally describe. Creek. No. d. Proposed-measures.to reduce or control surface, ground; and runoff water impacts, if any: - .. ... • Water Quality Treatment. 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree:fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs grass . pasture crop or grain • wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants:water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other X other types of vegetation Brambles. b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? See landscape plan. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: See landscape plan as included in Site Plan Approval Submittal 5 • Environmental Checklist • • 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other Unknown Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other Unknown. • Fish: bass, salmon,trout, herring, shellfish, other Unknown. b. List any threatened.or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Unknown. • c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain Unknown. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: N/A. . 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES. a. What kinds of energy (electric; natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Basic electrical & gas services to. .be..used ..for heating & cooking. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. • N/A. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Standard features as required to meet minimum building & energy code requirements. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH • a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. N/A. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: N/A. 6 Environmental Checklist b: Noise 1) What types.of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example:traffic, equipment, operation, other)? ; Unknown.. .Possibly the railroad:, 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Construction noise 7: OOAM-5: OOPM. 3) ' Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Minimum measures as to comply with required laws & codes. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Vacant. Property to the West has a residence. b. ; Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Yes. c. Describe any structures on the site. None. • . . . . . • • d. i Will any structures be demolished? If so,what? • Ni/A. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? CA Zone. Arterial commercial. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? N/A. g. If applicable,what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, i specify. No. ; Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 8,—10 . 7 • Environmental Checklist j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. . k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N/A. . I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Project is allowed per CA Zoning. 9. • HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, • middle, or low-income housing. N/A. b. Approximately how many.units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. N/A.. c. Proposed'measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N/A. • 10. AESTHETICS ' a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is - the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. 50ft. height E. I.F. S. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? View of site from 43rd St. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: See Site Plan Approval Submittal. 11. .LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Typical Homegate site lighting at nighttime. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. 8 i Y • Environmental Checklist c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Shield lighting from adjacent properties. 12.. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Unknown. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: N/A. 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or. cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: N/A. 14. TRANSPORTATION • a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. SW 43rd Street — city standard commercial entrances. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes in area. • • A .ti io c. How many parking spaces would the'completed project'have? How many would the project eliminateZ . ..• , . • .,_ ..;•, , • 116 spaces provided. no part i.p.%.orl,, site currently. • Environmental Checklist d. Will the proposal require any new roads.or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not Including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private? • No. . e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If. known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. • 562 new trips per day. 53 trips during peak P.M. hour. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: None. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Yes. It' s a new hotel development and will impact utilities, fire, police and other public services befitting of a new hotel. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None. 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service,telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing'the service', and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. • C. SIGNATURE . I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non- significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: • Name Printed: mAeAP"0" Date: /ate 0 10 • CITY OF RENTON JUL. 13 iSa9 MEMORANDUM �i11I�Uo+yu DATE: r U/4 'J D, /'11 TO: Construction Services, Fire Prevention, Plan Review, Project Planner FROM: Jim Hanson, Development Services Division Director SUBJECT: New Preliminary Application: /1G'Nl S-E7/1-1-E-- gZit TFS LOCATION: Z'7 ? 7 .sw ' -A (,2 c Cal (SdCC._ A meeting with the applicant has been scheduled for , :00 , Thursday, ol)0 a, "'1 for one of the 6th floor conference rooms (new city hall). If this meeting is scheduled at 10:00 AM, the MEETING MUST BE CONCLUDED PRIOR TO 11:00 AM to allow time to prepare for the 11 :00 meeting. Please review the attached project plans prior to the scheduled meeting with the applicant: You will not need to do a thorough "permit level" review at this time. Note only major issues that must be resolved prior to formal land use and/or building permit application submittal. If you are unable to attend the meeting, please send a representative. Please submit your written comments to Pezi-CCU at least two (2) days before the meeting. Thank you. __/64t,&-1 • DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON AUG 18 1998 t"\ECEIV • ` i TY Pet CITY OF RENTON FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU MEMORANDUM DATE July 14, 1998 TO: , Peter Rosen, Planner FROM: Jim Gray, Assistant Fire Marsha SUBJECT: Home Gate Suites, SW 43rd St. Fire Department Comments: 1. The preliminary Fire flow is 3000 GPM which requires one fire hydrant within; 150 feet of the building and two additional hydrants within 300 feet of the building. 2. A fire mitigation fee of$38,847.12 is required based on $.52 a square foot of the building square footage. 3. Separate plans and permits are required for Sprinkler and fire alarm systems installation. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. HOMEGATE SUITES SW 43rd Street W/O Oakesdale Ave. SW Pre-Application July 20, 1998 WATER: 1. The Water System Development Connection Charge is $0.113 per square feet of gross site area, (but not less than$850). 2. A 12-inch water main is located in the existing 10-foot utility easement extending north and south through the property. 3. Relocation of the existing 12-inch water main to the east parking lot isle way could be considered. 4. The project is located in the NE 36-23-4 Quarter Section Map. 5. A 12-inch water main is also available for service in SW 43rd Street for service. 6. One(1) fire hydrant is required for each 1000 gpm of required fire flow. 7. The primary hydrant is to be within 150-feet of the building, but not closer then 50-feet and • all secondary hydrants to be within 300 feet of the building. 8. If the required fire flow is above 2500 gpm than a loop water system is required. 9. For; Environment review a conceptual plan for utilities is required which includes mains, valves and hydrants. (t'U'OliorJ)/Paint Pz-Erv/41 10. The project is located in the downtown 196 water pressure zone. Static pressure should be between 30 and 80 psi. 11. The project is located within the phase I of the Oakesdale Business Campus plat. Requirements in phase I for the plat may have some indirect impact to this proposal if not mitigated as requested in the City's review of phase I. 12. Proposed plans to meet City of Renton drafting standards. I . 13. A new utility easement document to be approved by city staff before a construction permit can be issued. 14. Construction plans to provide a vertical profile. SEWER(Waste water): 1. The Sewer System Development Connection charge is $0.078 per site square feet of gross area, (but not less than$585). 2. Phase I of Oakesdale Business Campus proposed a main extension to Oakesdale Ave. SW. To service the site. The main sewer line is located in Oakesdale Ave. SW. 98CM105.DOC\ • 3. If the project produces fats, oils, orgrease the applicant is to be advised that an appropriate PP removal system will be required. • • 4. Include the sewer in the conceptual utility plans. Proposed structures must no be built over or within 10-feet of a utility easement. 6. A vertical profile to be shown with the construction plans. 7. The side sewer to have a minimum of 6-inches diameter ant a 2% slope: 8. Show City of Renton Standard Details on Plan sheet for all utilities for typical details. 9. The swimming pool to have a separate line from the building to the main extension. STORM(Surface Water): 1. The Storm System Development Connection charge is $0.129 per square foot of new impervious surface area, (but not less than$385). 2. Use the NAVD 1988 datum on the proposed construction plans. 3. The applicant to provide a storm drainage level 1 report which addresses all conditions as stated in the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual for Core and Special Requirements. 4. Phase I of the Oakesdale Business Campus has requirements that may have indirect impacts to this proposal if not mitigated as request in the City's review of Phase I. 5. Show and delineate any wetlands on the site. 6. Drawing size is 22"x 34"with a scale of 1"=20'. 4F" 2E 7. The City title block is available on disk at the 6th floor counter. 8. Temporary Erosion/sedimentation control plans required. 9. Construction plans to provide a vertical profile and City Standard detail drawings. 10. Show topography of entire site and a minimum of 30-feet outside the property. TRANSPORTATION: 1. The traffic mitigat'o IT n fee is $75 per new trip generated as per calculated from the E trip Generation Manual 2. A brief traffic report�to be provided showing the estimated trip distribution. Also show estimated trips through the intersection of Oakesdale Ave SW and SW 41st. St. This intersection is scheduled for a future traffic signal installation. The applicant will be requested to participate in the cost on a percentage of traffic generated through the intersection. . I 98CM 105.DOC\ Indicate in the Traffic Report if the service level will be impacted at the intersection of SW 43rd St. and Oakesdale Ave. SW. /� r p�yZis rC,v�u 4. Provide the City of Renton drivewaya/ Standard detail drawing on the construction plans. 5. Show driveway locations on the opposite side of the roadway. Driveways should be located opposite each other where possible or practical. 98cm105 98CM105.DOC\ CITY OF RENTON Planning / Building / Public Works MEMORANDUM DATE: June 23, 1998 TO: Pre-Application File FROM: Peter Rosen, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Homegate Suites- Pre-Application File#98-56 We have completed a review of the pre-application for the proposed Homegate Suites. Listed below are our preliminary findings. Every attempt is made to ensure that these comments are complete; however, a more thorough examination of the project at the time of application submittal may reveal additional issues. Zoning. The subject site is zoned Arterial Commercial (CA). Hotels and motels are allowed as a primary permitted use in the CA zone. Development Standards Setbacks - The CA zone includes a minimum front/street building setback of 10 feet. No side or rear yard setbacks are required. The pre-application site plan complies with building setback requirements. Landscaping - The CA zone requires a minimum landscape strip of 10 feet along public streets. This landscape strip must be provided on the applicant's property. The proposed site plan appears to comply with this code requirement. 10 The code requires a pedestrian connection between the building entry and the street frontage sidewalk. The site plan submittal should be revised to comply with the code requirement. The Parking Ordinance requires landscaping in the interior of parking lots over 10,000 square feet in size. The code requires interior landscaping equal to 5% of the area of the parking lot. The calculation of this required landscape area should be provided on the site plan submittal. A 5 foot wide landscape strip is required between parking areas and ab tting lots. The pre-application appears to satisfy this requirement. C 13e.e,nn S (t -r 'ts) Building Height-The maximum building height in the CA zone is 50 feet. (Ta'v`'E'^') Parking - The Parking and Loading Ordinance requires 1 parking space per guest room and 2 parking spaces per 3 employees for motels and hotels. The pre-application indicates 116 parking spaces for 113 occupancy units. Please provide information stating the number of anticipated employees in the project narrative and on the parking analysis on the legend of the site plan submittal. Required parking stall dimensions are 20 feet in length and a 9 foot width. Compact parking stalls are 16 feet in length and 8.5 feet in width. Compact parking spaces may not account for more than 40% of designated employee parking or ai of all other parking. Aisle widths of 24 feet are required for 90 degree head-in parking. The parking may overhang into the required landscape areas by 2 feet. However, the width of the landscape strip must be increased accordingly to meet the landscape width requirements. Springbrook Creek-The Shoreline Master Program requires commercial development to have a 50 foot setback from the high water mark of Springbrook Creek. The proposal meets this requirement. If a trail is !constructed along the south side of the creek as part of the overall Oakesdale Business Campus development, the applicant may be required to provide a public access connection from the sidewalk along SW 43rd Street as part of the shoreline permit. Homegate Suites.DOC Permit Requirements. The proposal would require SEPA environmental review, administrative Site Plan Review and a Shorelines Substantial Development Permit. SEPA Environmental Checklist-A SEPA environmental checklist must be submitted with the application materials. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) will review the proposal and issue a threshold Q determination. /S Site Plan Review - Site Plan Review is required for all development proposals (which meet SEPA thresholds) in the Commercial Arterial (CA) zone designation. Site Plan Review evaluates site layout, building orientation, pedestrian and vehicular circulation, parking, screening/buffering, and code/policy compliance, according to specific criteria outlined in the Site Plan Review Ordinance (Section 4-31-33). Shorelines - A Shorelines Substantial Development Permit is required because the proposed development would be within 200 feet of Springbrook Creek. The Shorelines Permit cannot be issued by the City until the end of the SEPA appeal period. The permit is then sent to the Department of Ecology (DOE) followed by a 21 day appealperiod., The entire permit process would require approximately 9 to 11 weeks. cc: Jana Huerter Z7h'-r'1 /2tn/2 — /L.`nib 6 v — - Ups jt-3 GYM ^77420 Z — ✓� (q --4t7'4 y 67Z //`-6 � i/7 Homegate Suites.DOC °I`a •S!A ' { RECEIVED MEMORANDUM JUL 1 3 1998 ECONOMIIC DEVELOPMENT. NEIGHBORHOODS. •• AND 4`gA7Art;r•DI pn,r:Ir i DATE: c DLL 101 /'7 if TO: Long Range Planning FROM: Jim Hanson, Development Services Division Director SUBJECT: New Preliminary Application: 1-i01 6A-7 l TES LOCATION: 11%'0Y ? -7z i F , w�- ' we€Sl Of 6Ja.P?-e<sdGZihi Please review the attached preliminary project plans for consistency with applicable Comprehensive Plan Policies. Please submit your written comments to P.ei i/ no later than rrUi`l d-I st- . Thank you. We will not be able to include comments received after this date in the presentation/summary we prepare for the applicant. • S Ile 15! CDE-.5i4N1Pc-r '0 t;11PL0;'w1Emir P{ � - vALLIry (e. v) ON THE- CoNIQ�0HEN511/� PLAN L+°“rlrJ USN P./A(' f}NrJ zc Jer) GA. N o poc-'cY 155uE5 . DEVELOPMENT PLANNING ' CITY OF RENTON AUG 18 1998 August 13, 1998 ARCHITECTURAL DIMENSIONS RECEIVED 1600 South Main Street, Ste. 275 Mr. Peter Rosen Walnut Creek,CA City of Renton, Current Planning Division 94596-5341 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 James Heilbronner Architect C 11531 Re: Homegate Suites S.W. 43rd St. & Oakesdale Avenue, SW Renton, Washington Subject: Site Plan Approval and Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Submittal Dear Peter,, Enclosed please find the following documents for the above referenced project: Quantity Date Description 12 sets, 8/14/98 Design Documents, bluelines, sheets DR-1 thru DR-12, 24" x 36" format. Includes Site Plan, Neighborhood Detail Map, Project Analysis, Elevations, Grading Plan, Utilities Plan, Drainage Plan, Landscape Plan and Floor Plans. The Tree Inventory Plan is included on the Site Plan. 2 sets 8/14/98 Design Documents, sheets DR-1 thru DR-12, 8-1/2" x 11 " format. (1 original and 1 copy) Includes 2-4"x6"reductions of the Neighborhood Detail Map. 12 8/11/98 Master Application Form (1 original and 11 copies) 12 8/14/98 Environmental Checklist 3 6/14/98 Title Report 2 sets - Mailing Labels 2 - Property Owners List 1 I - Application Fee 5 5/10/98 Pre-application Meeting Summary 12 8/13/98 Project Narrative 5 8/13/98 Construction Mitigation Description 4 8/8/98 Drainage Report — Preliminary Technical Information Report for Homegate Suites Hotel as prepared by David Evans and Associates, Inc. This includes Flood Plain Map information. 800-452-3477 El Phone:925-932-8651 Fax:925-746-8744 II E-Mail: archdim@california.com 1111 • • Mr. Peter Rosen 2 August 13, 1998 tion Date Description p 5 8/5/98 Geotechnical Report — Preliminary Geotechnical Report, Proposed Homegate Suites Hotel as prepared by David Evans and Associates, Inc. 5 8/98 Traffic Study — Traffic Impact Analysis, Home gate Suites Hotel as prepared by Entranco. Inc. 1 set 8/14/98 Color Display Maps — Site Plan, Neighborhood Detail Map and Landscape Plan. The above referenced enclosures constitute our submittal for a Site Plan Approval and Shoreline Substantial Development Permit. It is our understanding that the following submittal items are not required or applicable for this project: 1 . Wetlands Report 2. Rezone and Conditional Use Justifications Please conact our office if you have any questions or require additional information. Sincerely, ARC TECT DIMENSIO J fr . ac Adam Enclosures cc: Bill Updike, Prime Hospitality Angelo Stambules, Prime Hospitality HG005/C-1 w/ encl. 081398jsm hand carry INC. D E A Job Number 1 Preliminary Technical Information Report for Homegate Suites Hotel Renton,Washington 8/8/98 Prepared for: • Prime Hospitality Prepared by: Brian Callagan,PE • David Evans and Associates, Inc 3700 Pacific Highway East, Suite 311 Tacoma, Washington 98424 _ I DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON AUG 18 1998 ,ECER /ED I. PROJECT OVERVIEW The project propooses to construct a single three story hotel on the north side of SW 43rd Street and west of Oakesdale Avenue SW in Renton, Washington. The site is approximately 3.1 acres and is bordered on the north by Springbrook Creek and on the west by an existing lot with a single family residence and outbuildings typical of an older farm. The project construction includes grading,paving,parking, stormdrainage collection, sanitary sewer extensions,water line extensions for service and fire protection, and landscaping. Access to the site will be from SW 43rd Street with two curbcuts (conforming to Renton Standard: Cement Concrete Approach for Driveways,Drawing FRO IN) The existing site is rough graded and surface drains to the north to Springbrook Creek. There is no existing improvements on the site and existing vegetation is minimal. Based on this,the entire site is pervious. The King County Storm Water Manual show the site to have a 100 year,24 hour rainfall 3.9 inches. The development will consist of approximately 30%pervious and 70% impervious surfaces. The site is Parcel N of the Zelman Oakesdale Campus, Phase I,with development plans currently being reviewed by the City of Renton. Included in the design for this larger development are storm sewers sized for the future development of this site. These are shown on drawings entitled Grading and Storm Drainage Plan Sheets 1-3 by Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Job#5911(hereafter referred to as"Developer's System"). These were not approved at the time of site plan approval submission for this project. The storm drainage improvements planned by the developer of Homegate Suites Hotel will consist of surface and underground conveyance only as detention and water quality requirements are to be met by the Developer's System. Collected rainfall will be conveyed from the front of the site to the rear(north)by curb and gutter and valley gutters. These are sized adequately to pass the 100 year 24 hours storm with a depth of less than 3 inches. The surface drainage then discharges into 2 catchbasins to the, then in underground piping out the of project area on Developer's System. Detention, treatment and other controls are then the responsibility of the developer. The entire site, except for the area now identified as the 50' setback from Springbrook Creek, is tributary to this Developer's System. The undeveloped site currently discharges to Sp ingbrook Creek over the streambank or percolates into the surface in one of several depressions. The current drainagei•will be modified by the project except in the 50' setback buffer adjacent to Springbrook Creek, approximately 1/5 of the site. The remainder of the site is tributary to the Developer's System. The following Core and Special Conditions of the King County Surface Water Design Manual Section 3.4 have bearing on the proposed project: Core Requirement 1: Discharge at the Natural Location (Location of discharge of completed Developer's System is to Springbrook Creek after retention/detention. This discharge location is upstream of the project area) Core Requirement 2: Off-Site Analysis (Level 1 Analysis for this specific project was not performed. Developer's System presumed to have addressed) Core Relquirement 3: Runoff Control (Developer's System presumed to have addressed) Core Relquirement 4: Conveyance System (Underground conveyance on the site adequately sized for runoff of site drainage', adequacy of Developer's System determined by others) Core Requirement 5: Erosion/Sedimentation Control (Temporary Erosion/Sedimentation control will be designed to confine sediment to the site,within the area being developed) Core Requirement 6: Maintenance and Operation (Maintenance and operation manual will be included in the completed TIR). Core Requirement 7: Bonds and Liability • Special Requirement 1: Critical Drainage Areas (Not applicable) Per discussion with Ali Sadr, Barghausen Consulting Engineers; 8/98 Special Requirement 2: Compliance with an Existing Master Drainage Plan (Determined by Developer's System Designer) Special Requirement 3: Conditions Requiring a Master Drainage Plan (Not applicable) Special Requirement 4: Adopted Basin or Community Plan (Compliance with any Basin or Community plan is the responsibility of the designer of the Developer's System). Special Requirement 5: Special Water Quality Controls (Developer's Systems, according to plans provided includes a Combined Wetpond/Detention Pond. This pond, properly constructed, meets the requirements of this requirement) Special Requirement 6: Coalescing Plate Oil/Water Separators(The project does not meet the threshold requirements and does not require a Coalescing Plate Oil/Water Separator) Special Requirement 7: Closed Depressions (The project is not in a closed depression) Special Requirement 8: Use of Lakes, Wetlands or Closed Depressions for Peak Rate Runoff Control (Not Applicable) Special Requirement 9: Delineation of 100 Year Flood Plain (Per Developer's System plans, the 100 year floodplain for the development site is at elevation 21.55. and minimum building elevation for the project is to be 22.55, All finished surfaces of the proposed development are above these elevations.). Special Requirement 10: Flood Protection Facilities for Type 1 and 2 Streams (Not applicable) Special Requirement 11: Geotechnical Analysis and Report (The project will not construct a pond, infiltration system, or modify an existing flood protection facility, so this requirement is not applicable) Special Requirement 12: Soils Analysis and Report b (A soils analysis has been prepared for this site, and is submitted with the Site Plan Review Package). II. EXISTING CONDITIONS OF PROJECT SITE Physical evidence suggests that the project site was filled at some time in the past. It is not known when this fill was placed, however, the soils report by David Evans and Associates and another by Earth Consultants,Inc(dated December 8, 1997) confirmed 1 to 5 feet of fill. Underlying the fill is well and poorly graded sand with differing consolidation to the 30 foot level, at which point the sand is more densly compacted. Ground water level is 14' below the surface(elev 1 I +/-). Examination of the downstream facilities within 1/4 mile failed to show any flood damage or distress indications. III. OFF-SITE ANALYSIS Expected effect of the proposed improvements. The proposed improvements will collect the rainfall runoff from both pervious and impervious surfaces on the site and discharge to the proposed storm drainage system to be constructed by Zelman Development Company. The collected runoff from several sites will flow to a combination wetpond/detention facility approximately 250 feet east of the northeast corner of the project. Storm water attenuation and water quality treatment will be the responsibility of the development. There will be no on-site detention/retention or water quality treatment on the project site. Level 1 Downstream Analysis The runoff from the site presently drains into Springbrook Creek. ultimately draining into the Puget Sound. Water surface elevation for the 100 year storm is identified as approximately 21.55 feet MSL, below the minimum site improvements elevation of 22.00 MSL. There are no indications of existing erosion problems. There also does not appear to be problem with either downstream flooding or undersized or under-capacity conveyance/detention systems. These items should also be addressed in thelimprovement plans submitted for the Oakesdale Business Park. As this proposed project will reduce surface • discharge to Springbrook Creek, this development will therefore not aggravate downstream conditions. If properly sized detention capacity is incorporated in the proposed Oakesdale Business Park system, any increased runoff due to this proposal should be offset by the detention capacity of the system. IV. RETENTION/DETENTION ANALYSIS AND DESIGN The proposed development of the site will increase the amount of impervious area, and accelerate the time of concentration at entry points of underground conveyance systems. No analyis was performed to determine the adequacy of the off-site retention/detention system. V. CONVEY NCE SYSTEMS ANALYSIS AND DESIGN The proposed on-site system includes 18 ft of underground conveyance systems and two catch basins. Surface drainage is collected in valley gutters and conveyed to these two catch basins. VI. EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL Temporary ESC measure standard to the industry and in conformance with the City of Renton and King County standards will be used during construction. These ESC facilities will be detailed in the construction plans. Permanent ESC will be provided by stabilized ground covers and a combination of landscaping, buildings and paving. VII. OTHER ERMITS This section if limited to addressing special and specific requirements of the King County Surface Water Design Manual. Special Requirement#1 Critical Drainage Areas This site is not located in a critical drainage area for which unique design requirement are applied. This require]lent if not applicable. Special Require gent#2 Compliance with an Existing Master Drainage Plan Not app'icable. Special Require rent#3 Conditions Requiring a Master Drainage Plan This project does not include clearing of over 500 acres, nor a development of more than 50 acres. This requirement if not applicable. Special Requirement#4 Adopted Basin or Community Plans Not Applicable. r � I Special Requirement#5 Special Water Quality Standards Water quality treatment and conformance with water quality standards is the responsibility of the developer and the Developer's System. Special Requirement#6 Coalescing Plate Oil/Water Separator The site does not have over five acres of impervious surface upon which there will be vehicular traffic. This requirement if not applicable. Special Requirement#7 Closed Depression The site is not located in a closed depression. This requirement if not applicable. Special Requirement#8 Use of Lakes, Wetlands or Closed Depressions for Peak Rate Runoff The proposed construction does not have or require peak rate runoff control. This requirement if not applicable. Special Require rent#9 Delineation of 100 Year Floodplain The site abutts Springbrook Creek and has a 100 year floodplain identified. The elevation of this floodplain is approximately 21.55 feet. All surface improvements shown are above this elevation. Special Requirement#10 Flood Protection Facilities for Type 1 and 2 Streams At the time of application, it has not been determined whether the stream adjacent to the project meets the criteria of a Type 1 or 2 stream. This will be determined prior to final submission of a TIR or final improvement plans. Special Requirement#11 Geotechnical Analysis and Report The proposal does not include the construction of a pond or infiltration system or the modification of a flood protection facility Special Requirement#12 Soils Analysis and Report The soils type of the proposed project area have been adequately mapped by the U.S. Department of Interior, Soils conservation Service. Consequently, no soils mapping will be prepared for this project. • @Ro ESSj6 : • .� 311 !p A ) t$ .4$•►3° u7/Z2F/0ts iuh 1S:•u/ tAX Z5J bLZ a7s1 llAVlll tvAr's&Assu( All: tjuuz 1 i1 h — lY`U'� .Rx• : sirs'.�r.�u.,r�x�-- ,c, ,r COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE V C. r 11 i . i CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY ~ 1� • of CHICAGO TITLE'. INSURANCE COMPANY, a Missouri corporation, herein called the Company, for a valuable •ciI considerarion, heresy t'nntmits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance, as identilied Schedule Schule A, in favor of the proposed Insured mimed in Schedule A, as owner or mortgagee of the innate or interest covered hereby in the v land etescribcei or referred to in Schedule A. upon payment of the premiums and charges therefore; till >,uNect to the i prom;tons or Schedules A and 1i and to the hxclusions from Coverage(appearing herein)and to the Conditions and Stipulations herein. i. Ill This Comnnu1rcnt shall be effective only when the identity of the proposed insured and the mount or the policy or /#! politico committed for have been inserted in Schedule A hereof by the Company, either at the time of the issuance of this Cununtntcnt or by subsequent entlursenteiet. • fill'. This Commitment is prehntirutry to the issuance of such policy or policies of title insurance and all liability and ii4 abtigattlons he Ieundcr shall cease and terminate six months after the effective date hereof nr when the policy or policies committed For', shalt issue, whichever Brat occurs, provided that the failure to issue such policy or policies is not the lauft u the Company. fit tVirue:sa Whereof:CH,ICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY has caused this commitment to he signed and heated , ds of the date of misty shown in Schedule A. the policy w become valid when countersigned by an authorized '� i signatory. r :i! i 41! . Issued by: CHICAGO TTZ'LE INSURANCE COMPANY �� i�'i 160() Columbia Canter t.H1CAGt)'C'ITLE INSURANCE COMPANY �,' 701 Fifth Avenue By: Seattle-, Washington 98104 �y � . ° � ease.-� f •T' I�";� Presldcut u Sl Its: T. I ` 1 edltek‘A.0.44,1 eatirfrigtt, IL .• Secretary l 4111___...... . DEVELOPMENT PLANNI'g AUG 181998 RECEIVED u7/26/96 ruts 15:ue FAA 253 912 9761 DAVID EVANS&ASSOCIATES 4 003 "%.::t. WO TITLE INSURANCE COMP Y■ae ooimmi.* comma, /es nree WIN= Title Unit: U-06 SEATTI+E. WA 98104 Phone: (206) 628-5610 A.L.TA.COMMITJ&ENT Fax: (2 06) 6 2 8-9 717 SCHEDULE A Order No,: 5144 34 Officer: DARYL S/ROGER T/BAR9 W/PAUL s. a•s+ Your No.: zs nasrar moss:sum Commitment Effective Date: JUNE 14. 1998 at 8:0o A.M. L. Policy or Policies to be issued: ALTA Owner's Policy Amount: $1,425,000.00 1992 STANDARD Premium: $2,087.00 Ctuaaxezu, ortlrsae ssAumaan MAT Tent RATE • Tax $ 17 9.4 8 Proposed Insured: MINE I!OSPITALITY CORP. Policy or Policies to be issued: Amount: S 0.o o Al-TA Loan olicy Premium: Tax: Proposed Insured: Policy or Policies to be issued: Amount: $0.OD ALTA Loan Policy Premium: Tax: Proposed Insured: • The estate or interest in the land which is covered by this Commitment is: FEE SIMPLE . Title to the e tate or interest in the land is at the effective date hereof vested in: 2ELMAN RENTON, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY • a. The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows: SBE ATTACHED LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT CHICAGO T II.E INSURANCE COMPANY wvrAcomatoaist 07/28/98 TUE 15:U8 FAA 253 922 9781 DAVID EVENS&ASSU( IA'T S 10004 • CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L,TA COUNT SCHEDULE A (Continued) -v Order No.: 514434 Your No.: r iui/Pn aosrrsarsrt • LEGAL DESCRIPTION 14iquarr (Puagraph 4 of Schedule A ccohnuation) THE WEST 300 FEET OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY: PARCEL 1: THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OP THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN. IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING ON THE NORTH LINE OF THE COUNTY ROAD AT A POINT WHICH IS 943.04 FEET EAST AND 30 FEET NORTH OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF HENRY ADAMS DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 43 IN SAID TOWNSHIP AND RANGE; THENCE NORTH 03°49'00" EAST 495.8 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE CENTERLINE OF THE DRAINAGE DITCH; THENCE, ALONG SAID DITCH LINE, SOUTH 66603'00" WEST 208.23 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 409.46 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID COUNTY ROAD; THENCE EAST. ALONG SAID ROAD LINE, 158.85 FEET TO POINT OF BEGINNING: EXCEPT RIGHT OF WAY FOR SAID DRAINAGE DITCH; AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF CONDEMNED IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NUMBER 81- 00117-7 FOR WIDENING OF S.W. 43RD STREET. PARCEL 2: THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH. RANGE 4 EAST, 'WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE NORTH SIDE OF S.W. 43RD STREET WHICH IS 943.04 FEET EAST OF THE INORTHEA$T CORNER OF HENRY ADAMS DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 43, IN SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY. WASHINGT'ON; THENCE EAST 353.04 FEET. ALONG THE NORTH SIDE OF SAID STREET; THENCE NORTH 562.16 FEET TO SPRING BROOK SLOUGH DRAINAGE DITCH NO. 1; THENCE WESTERLY, ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF SAID DITCH, 334.12 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF' A 5-ACRE TRACT DEEDED TO WINSTON AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 580 OF DEEDS, PAGE 207, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE SOUTHERLY, ALONG SAID LINE, 472.1 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF CONDEMNED IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NUMBER S1-2-08117-7 FOR WIDENING OF S.W. 43RD STREET. (THIS LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS DRAWN BASED ON A PRELIMINARY SKETCH PROVIDED TO THE COMPANY AND IS NOT TO SE USED FOR PURPOSES OF CLOSING. WE ARE UNABLE TO DETERMINE THAT THE BOUNDARIES WILL MATCH THE FINAL SHORT PLAT AND THIS DESCRIPTION WILL BE AMENDED UPON REVIEW OF THE FINAL SHORT PLAT.) mw CHICAGO TITLE INSti RANCE COMPANY a4cu,+6/t4svrl 07/28/98 TUE 15:1)9 FAX 253 922 9781 DAVID EVANS&ASSOCIATES .- -- • 14005 • CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.T,A.COMMITMENT SCDU A (Cautioned) Order No,: 5 .4434 —_ Your No.: max/ma cospsraim LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHx8IT (Paragraph 4 of Schedule A continuation) • CHICAGO TULE INSURANCE COMPANY d s/l-tso7/,rm U7/28/98._ TUE15:g9 FAX 253 922 9781 _ _ DAVID EVANS&ASSOCIATES _ 11000 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA.COMMITMENT . SCHEDULE Order No.. 514a36 Your No.: Llama/suss Boss=raiarr Anir- Schedule B of the 4olicy or policies to be issued will contain a ecptions to the following=attcts unless the saute are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company. GENE .A.L EXCEPTIONS A. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. B- Encroachments.overlaps,boundary line disputes,or other matters which would be disclosed by an accurate survey and inspection of the premises. C. Easements,or claims of easements,not shown by the public records. D. Any lien.or right to a lien,for contributions to employee benefit funds.or for state workers' compensation,or for services,labor,or material heretofore or hereafter furnished,all as imposed by Iaw,and not shown by the public records. E. Taxes or special assessments which are not shown as eristiag liens by the public records. F Any service,installation,connection,maintenance,tap,capacity or construction charges for sewer,water, electricity.ather utilities,or garbage collection and disposal. G.Reservations or exceptions in patents or is Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; Indian tribal codes or regulations,Indian treaty or aboriginal rights,including easements or equitable servitudes. H. Water rights,ctaims,or title to water. I. Defects,liens,enctunbrances,adverse claims or other matters,if any,created,first appearing in the public records,or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment_ SPEQAI_EXCEPTIONS FOLLOW • CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY , w1 rwppM 07/28/98 TUE 15:09 FAX 253 922 9781 DAVID EVANS&ASSOCIATES _ 4 007 C HICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.LT A.COMMITMENT SCHEDULE (continued) Qrdcr o.: 000514434 our No.: SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS A 1. EASEMENT AND TEE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: DISCLOSED BY: DEED PURPOSE: RIGHT OF THE PUBLIC TO MAINTAIN DRAINAGE DITCH AFFECTS: NORTEERLY, PORTION OF SAID PREMISES AND OTHER PROPERTY RECORDED: APRIL 10, 1907 RECORDING NUMBER; 479017 a 2. EASEMENT AND THE TERME AND CONDITIONS THEREOF; GRANTEE: CITY OF RENTON PURPOSE: PUBLIC UTILITIES WITH NECESSARY APPURTENANCES AREA'AFFECTED: A STRIP OF LAND 15 FEET IN WIDTH OVER A WESTERLY PORTION OF SAID PREMISES AND OTHER PROPERTY RECORDED: APRIL 25, 1974 RECORDING NUMBER: 7404250404 • • 3. RIGHT TO MAKE NECESSARY SLOPES FOR CUTS OR FIL.IS UPON PROPERTY HEREIN DESCRIBED AS CONDEMLUED IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE 81- -08117-7. • 4. ANY QUESTIONS RELATING TO THE TRUE LOCATION OF THE DRAINAGE DITCH AS IT PRESENTLY EXISTS IN RELATION TO THE RIGHT OP WAY BOUNDARIES ESTABLISHED BY DECREE ENTERED IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NUMBER 32912. • s. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND CONSENT DECREE RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 9712312199 AND FILED IN KING COUNTY UNDER SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NUMBER 97-2-17988-2 REGARDING CLEANUP OF CONTAMINATION. • 6. THE EFFECT OF ANY .VIOLATION OF LAWS. ORDINANCES OR REGULATIONS RELATING TO ENVIRONMNETAL PROTECTION AS DISCLOSED BY INFORMATION CONTAINED IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NUMBER 97-2-17988-2 CHJCAOO TITLE MISUROCE COMPANY «uummon whin 07/28/98 TUE 15:1U FAA 253 922 9781 llAVlll FvANS&A55U( 1A1E5 • CU1CAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L TA.COMMITMENT S (ConnuLE tinue-4) B Order No.: 514434 YourNO.: INSJIMIFILIMIZ Ioar;rkttTY SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS AND/OR OTHER COURT FILES RELATED THERETO. 7. PAYMENT OF THE REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX, IF REQUIRED. THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SITUATED WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF LOCAL TAXING AUTHORITY OF CITY OF RENTON. PRESENT RATE IS 1.78E. ANY CONVEYANCE DOCUMENT MUST SE ACCOMPANIED BY THE OFFICIAL WASHINGTON STATE EXCISE TAX AFFIDAVIT. THE APPLICABLE EXCISE TAX MUST BE PAID AND THE AFFIDAVIT APPROVED AT THE TIME OF THE RECORDING OF THE CONVEYANCE DOCUMENTS. a 9• GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYASL,E FEERUARY 15. DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES) : YEAR: 1990 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER; 362304-9045-05 LErY CODE: 2110 ASSESSED VALUE-LAND; $ 2,445,800.00 AS ESSED VALUE-IMPROVEMENTS; $ 1,000.00 GE RAL & SPECIAL TAXES: BILLED: $32,364.25 PAID- $16,182.13 UNPAID: $16.182.12 AFFECTS: SAID PREMISES AND OTHER PROPERTY dr 9- PENDING ACTION IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT: CAtTSE NUMBER: 97-2-17988-2 FILED: JULY 18, 1997 BEING AN ACTION FOR: ENTER CONSENT DECREEE PLAINTIFF: STATE OF WASHINGTON, DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY DEFENDANT: ZELMAN RENTON L.L.C. ATTORNEY FOR THE PLAINTIFF: MARX C. JOBSON CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY es.emethim/iaS40 U7/28/ 3S ruh 15:1U FAA Z,J aLG a7�S1 UAV1D hVAlN ,&AbbV41A11 b WJUU ' 1^ - t CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.LT4-COMMITMENT SCHEDULE E (Continue) ' +� rdcr Na.: 514434 �. . `u, Your 1 o.: SQaw1/aar� RosstsusYr SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS z 10. MATTERS DISCLOSED BY A SURVEY OF THE PREMISES BY BARGHAUSEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. , DATED OCTOBER 22, 1995, JOB NO. 5911: ENCROACHMENT BY CARPORT APPURTENANT TO SAID PREMISES ONTO PROPERTY TO 'THE WEST. x 1_. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AGREEMENT FOR 2ELMAN RENTON, LLC, A DELAWA.RE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY x NOTE: A COPY OF THE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AGREEMENT, AND 5 THERETO, IF ANY, MUST BE SUBMITTED. .. x 12. ANY CONVEYANCE OR MORTGAGE BY ZELMAN RENTON, LLC. A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, MUST BE EXECUTED IN ACCORDANCE WrTH THE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AGREEMENT AND EY ALL THE MEMBERS AND THEIR RESPECTIVE SPOUSES AS OF THE DATE OF ACQUISITION, OR EVIDENCE HUsT BE SUBMITTED THAT CERTAIN DESIGNATED MANAGERS/MEMBERS NAVE BEEN AUTHORIZED TO ACT FOR THE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY. • 4 13. TITLE IS TO VEST IN PRIME HOSPITALITY CORP. , AND WILL THEN BE SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING MATTERS SHOWN AT PARAGRAPH(S) 14. a 14. WE 1:IND NO CORPORATION UNDER THE NAME OF PRIME HOSPITALITY CORP. ON THE LIST OF ACTIVE CORPORATIONS IN THE OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE. IT MAY NOT BE A LEGAL ENTITY CAPABLE OF HOLDING AN WREST IN REAL PROPERTY. EVIDENCE OF THE EXISTENCE OF SAID COR ORATION MUST BE SUBMITTED. ar 15. THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS DRAWN EASED ON A PRELIMINARY SKETCH PROVIDED TO THE COMPANY AHD IS NOT TO BE USED FOR PURPOSES OF CLOSING. WE ARE UNABLE TO DETERMINE THAT THE BOUNDARIES WILL MATCH THE FINAL SHORT PLAT AND THE DESCRIPTION WILL BE AMENDED UPON REVlEw OF THE FINAL SHORT PLAT. o ' NOTE 1: EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1997, DOcuMENT FORMAT AND CONTENT REQUIREMENTS HAVE BEEN IMPOSED BY WASHINGTON LAW. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF THE DOCUMENT HY THE COUNTY RECORDER. FIRST PAGE OR COVER SHEET: - CFI C1GO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY amooml►bp•me, 07/28/98 TUE 15:11 FAX 253 922 9781 DAVID EVANS&ASSOCIATES 4_O10 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA.COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order Na.: 514434 Your No.: :11xax/ss=1a 411asr1Tu=K SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS 3" TOP MARGIN CONTAINING NOTHING EXCEPT THE RETURN ADDRESS. 1" SIDE AND BOTTOM MARGINS CONTAINING NO MARKINGS OR SEALS. TITILES) OF DOCUMENTS. RECORDING NO. OF ANY ASSIGNED, RELEASED OR REFERENCED DOCUMENT(S) _ GRANTORS NAMES (AND PAGE NO. WHERE ADDITIONAL NAMES CAN BE FOUND) _ GRANTEES NAMES (AND PAGE NO. WHERE ADDITIONAL NAMES CAN BE FOUND) . ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION (AND PAGE NO. FOR FULL DESCRIPTION) . ASSSSOR'S TAX PARCEL NUMHER(5) . RETURN ADDRESS (IN TOP 3" MARGIN) . *A COVER SHEET CAN BE ATTACHED CONTAINING THE ABOVE FORMAT AND DATA IF THE FIRST PAGE DOES NOT CONTAIN ALL REQUIRED DATA. ADDITIONAL PAGES: 1" TOP, SIDE AND BOTTOM MARGINS CONTAINING NO MARKINGS OR SEALS_ ALL PAGES: .. . No STAPLED OR TAPED ATTACHMENTS. EACH ATTACHMENT MUST BE A SEP TE PAGE. ALL NOTARY AND OTHER PRESSURE SEALS MUST BE SMUDGED FOR VISIBILITY. FONT SIZE OF B POINTS OR LARGER. THE FOLLOWING MAY BE USED AS AN ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON THE DOCUMENTS TO BE RECORDED TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF R.C.W. 55.04. SAID ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS NOT A SUBSTITUTE FOR A COMPLETE LEGAL DESCRIPTION WHICH MUST ALSO APPEAR IN THE BODY OF THE DOCUMENT: A FORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF 36-23-4. • mmimmimmw CHICAGOT[ILELISURANCECOMPANY uu /:m/b15A7 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND U.SE APPLICATIONSREQUIREMENTS BY BY OM E S • LAND USE J'ERMIT SUBMITTAL WAIVED MODIFIED c M NT —" • Calculations, Surveyi • , ,clifoFRENIuN • Drainage Report 2 Elevations .............................................................................................. AU J Elevations, Grading 2Existing Covenants (Recorded• • •• '-‘••••••••••••• • RFCLFAIIVFO— .. Existing Easements (Recorded Copy) 4 Flood Plain Map i applicable 4 Floor Plans 3AND4 Grading Plan,Conceptual 2 Grading Plan Detiled2 King County Assessor's Map Indicating Site 4 , * Landscaping . . Legal Description List of Surroundin •••••••:.: : : ................ Mailing Labels for Property Owners 4 •.••• ..•. Map of Existing Site Conditions 4 .s• ... Master Application, Form 4 Monument Cards tone per monument) i Parking, Lot Coveage & Landscaping Analysis 4 Plan Reductions (!MTs) Postage 4 PObtiCWorkS::ApprO.Vai ;etter.2. ..;.:... . Title Report.or Plat Certificate 4 Topography Map 5' contours)s • • Traffic Study 2 Tree CuttingNegeation Clearing Plan 4 Utilities Plan, Generalized 2 Wetlands Delineation Map4 . .. Wetlands Planting Plan 4 Wetlands Study 4 . • • • .. ............................. • This requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services Section PROJECT NAME: 061Ae_piot_.-5(1.4..ilde 2. Public Works plan Review Section 3. Building Section DATE: g 4. Development Planning Section hAdiViSinn s\riPvPInn spr\riAv nlan inrAtmaivar VIC *************** ************************************************ City of Renton A Reprinted: 08/18/98 15 :32 Receipt **************************************************************** Receipt Number: R9805053 Amount: 2 , 002 . 56 08/18/98 15 :32 Payment Method: CHECK Notation: #60-162 HOMEGATE Init: LN Project #: LUA98-128 Type: LUA Land Use Actions Parcel No: 362304-9045 Site Address : 1200 SW 43RD ST Total Fees : 2, 002. 56 This Payment 2, 002 .56 Total ALL Pmts : 2, 002 .56 Balance: . 00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 000 .345 . 81 . 00 . 0007 Environmental Review 500 . 00 000 . 345 . 81 . 00j0016 Shoreline Subst Dev 500 . 00 000 . 345 . 81 . 00 . 0017 Site Plan Approval 1, 000 . 00 000 . 05 . 519 .9042 . 1 Postage 2 . 56 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON AUG 18 1998 ECE VED qg-128 (t ) Traffic. Impact Analysis HOMEGATE SUITES HOTEL Prepared for Prime Hospitality Corporation Prepared by ENTRANCO, INC. 10900 NE 8th Street, Suite 300 Bellevue, Washington 98004 425-454-5600 August 1998 DEVELOPMENTCITYOFRENTON PLANNING AUG 18 1998 :` ECE VED CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS 1 Road Network 1 Traffic Volumes 4 TRAFFIC VOLUME FORECASTS 4 Trip Generation 4 Trip Assignment 4 Traffic Impact Analysis 6 Background Traffic Volume Growth 6 Level of Service Analysis 10 MITIGATION 11 APPENDIX A - Trip Assignment B. - LOS Calculations FIGURES Page 1. Project Vicinity 2 2. Site Map 3 3. Existing Facilities 5 4. Existing Volumes Weekday P.M. Peak Hour 7 5. Project Net New P.M. Peak Hour Trip Assignment 8 6. 1999 Traffic Volumes Without and With Project Trips 9 7. 2010 Traffic Volumes Prior to and After the Opening of Oakesdale Avenue SW Extension 12 TABLES Page 1. Trip Generation Summary 6 2. P.M. Peak-Hour Level of Service Summary 10 98081\REPORTS\HOMEGATE(08/06/98):jc INTRODUCTION This report documents the traffic impact analysis performed for the proposed HomeGate Suites Hotel to be located in Renton, Washington. This report addresses the existing traffic conditions in the immediate vicinity and provides an analysis and discussion of the traffic impacts created by and potential mitigation for the proposed hotel. The proposed location for the hotel is in the northwest quadrant at the intersection of SW 43rd Street and Oakesdale Avenue SW, which is part of the Oakesdale Business Campus. The proposed hotel will develop all of Parcel G and a portion of Parcel H of the Oakesdale Business Campus (figure 1). The hotel is bounded to the north by SpringIbrook Creek, to the east and west by the undeveloped portions of the Oakesdale Business Campus, and to the south by SW 43rd Street. HomeGate Suites Hotel is an all suites, extended-stay hotel. Most patrons will stay at the hotel more than one night. The hotel consists of 113 suites, which include kitchen units. A site plan for the hotel is presented in figure 2. Associated paved parking will surround the hotel. There are 116 parking spaces planned for the hotel, and there will be two all access driveways, both giving onto SW 43rd Street. Full buildout for the hotel is expected - by 1999. EXISTING CONDITIONS Road Network The plroposed HomeGate Suites Hotel is directly served by SW 43rd Street. Other arterial roadways that will be used by traffic from the proposed hotel include Oakesdale Avenue SW and SW 41st Street. Southwest 43rd Street is a four-to five-lane east-west principal arterial with two through lanes in each direction. The section of SW 43rd Street that blorders the hotel consists of five lanes, and includes a two-way left-turn lane. Southwest 43rd Street provides a link across the Green River Valley, connecting the South Center area in Tukwila with Renton. Interchange access for northbound SR 167 is provided on SW 43rd Street. There are sidewalks on both sides of the road and the speed limit is 35 miles per hour (mph). Oakesdale Avenue SW is a five-lane north-south minor arterial with two through lanes in each direction with localized left-turn lanes, raised landscaped medians, and sections of two-way left-turn lane. Currently, Oakesdale Avenue SW does not exist between SW 31st Street and SW 16th Street. In 1998, Oakesdale Avenue SW will be extended from SW 16th Street to SW 27th Street, while by 2010 it is planned that the remaining portion of Oakesdale Avenue SW between SW 27th Street and SW 31st Street will be constructed. Once the Oakesdale Avenue SW extensions are completed, Oakesdale Avenue SW will provide a five-lane north-south route from central Renton to the south Renton area. Currently, there are sidewalks on the east side of the road only in the project vicinity, and the speed limit is 35 mph. 98081\REPORTS\HOMEGATE(08/06/98):jc 1 r` / •,k. Oakesda/e Av SW lth St ' e. Amom..... t c :I ; 1II' ;; �\ '; ► SW 16th St MonstP� t 9 i �;} i ikix ' ,�� I H • r 4 3 41 V d not to scale i N 1 S.Longaaes,W?Y '?— t W LI ' I j a 181 IT ', E T l- I:, 1 ISW 216 St 1 - i ,/ ' c i •i it . II• r SW 34th St. I i ' it r" /, I'" a (167) 1 1: 1 +'y I 1 :..:.•:-:•. SW 41st St SW 43rd St 1) } - I Project i Site 1 t Figure I. © E N T R A N C O Project Vicinity _ _, -Tsr\I-.\• ,F.\\‘‘\-\\NA ,... ,---‘..." t: 5 G 1 � J I E � I C C j I `. C' I I G C C C_ C _ c f L t ccG I �® c fic:--4,.._ 1 / - _ L' i ._._.) 1-'1. f I 16, < ( FT C nR :1; • - Iiii t --: I f_ 7 ... 1, . . . . 11 A � f � t t I I _ I c. II t 7 II ' 1 I m 'n LANDSCAPE SS.eACK LIJ SLOPE EASEMCNT S . W . 43RD STREET nor `.1,, EE o HOMEGATE SUITES 4 jy IIu c RENTON, WANORTHNORTH Figure 2 © E N T R A N C O Site Map Southwest 41st Street is a four-lane east-west minor arterial with two through lanes in each direction. Southwest 41st Street provides a link between the southbound SR 167 interchange and the industrial/commercial areas in south Renton. Between Lind Avenue SW and Oakesdale Avenue SW, there are sidewalks on both sides of the street, and the speed limit is 25 mph. Existing roadway facilities for these arterials, as well as other local streets in the Renton area, are illustrated in figure 3. Traffic Volumes The City of Renton requested a traffic analysis of all driveway access points to the proposed hotel and the intersection of Oakesdale Avenue SW/SW 43rd Street. The City of Renton Engineering Department provided existing traffic volume data at the Oakesdale Avenue SW/SW 43rd Street intersection. The p.m. peak-hour turning movement count was obtained in 1997. The other two intersections are proposed driveways and therefore do not have existing turning movement counts. TRAFFIC VOLUME FORECASTS Trip Generation The proposed HomeGate Suites Hotel will generate some new traffic in the area. To estimate the number of vehicles that will be generated by the hotel, the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) 1997 Trip Generation manual, Sixth Edition, was used. The ITE land use code (LUC) 311, All Suites Hotel, was used to estimate the trip generation. Table 11 documents the estimated trip generation, and is based on 113 suites at an average occupancy rate of 80 percent as requested by the City of Renton. The site will generate approximately 562 net new trips per day, with 50 net new trips experienced during the p.m. peak hour. Trip Assignment The vehicle trip assignment for the proposed hotel's trip generation was based on existing travel patterns (figure 4) and access to major arterials. Also, consideration was given to the predicted change in traffic volumes on Oakesdale Avenue SW, as a result of the planned extension of Oakesdale Avenue SW from SW 27th Street to SW 31st Street. Figure 5 depicts the p.m. peak hour-trip assignment of the project-generated volumes on the surrounding street network. Trip assignment is provided in Appendix A. 98081\REPORTS\HOMEGATE(08/06/98):jc 4 k 'Y' \ I Y', Oakesda/ SW lth St i+< k s ter. ' sr„".- ,'__--- \\ `yam ;%4* \ "\ >\''? A away f'' '" eta y, %s y �� ). 'I Xy 1 Sw Monte, C • 11 ✓ �a�•••• If El -��\ 11 • -3 H. : , * \:;+ �-x s' IIa. not to scale • "-.. Is II �•� c - W I - •I i (i _ ; Legend l ` J,- l - offlimmal 3-lane section l I r I. ,t Mil 4-lane section — Y i tl SW 27th St. !; l ® 5-lane section - "t t'f '1 ,I ■ II II ill 5-lane section 4; - 'i. (proposed) gee ;/ i_ Ell ® 6-lane section Cs,i• / t I i g' 1 m Sidewalk I a i- ® (per side) i tt Signalized \ 3 1- intersection 'N N\ _ '\ 1. SW 34th St. I,_ 40 Speed Limit(mph) 0 40i. ;I I • tj fi _1- o .• IM r it' -I- 25 3 _ :(• - It �j1SrHCdS'. SW41stSt. co 1 I- 1 . o ..,..-r I ` ) SW 43rd St : 1.) _I Project :• _ 35 Site 1 • • • •• • Figure 3 © E N T R A N C O Existing Facilities I it Table 1 Trip Generation Summary Rate Trips ITE Occupiedi Land Use LUC Rooms In Out Total In Out Total Weekday P.M. Peak Hour All Suites Hotel 311 90 0.23 0.32 0.55 21 29 50 Weekday Daily Total All Suites Hotel 311 90 3.12 3.12 6.24 281 281 562 Note: Trip generation rates and/or equations were based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers' Trip Generation manual,Sixth Edition, 1997. 1. 113 rooms at an 80 percent occupancy rate=90 occupied rooms. TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Background Traffic Volume Growth The City of Renton recommended an annual growth rate of 2.5 to 3.0 percent in the study area when projecting future traffic volumes. Based on a history of average daily traffic volumes on Oakesdale Avenue SW between 1992 and 1997, it was calculated that this average annual growth rate on Oakesdale Avenue SW is actually 1.6 percent. For this reason, an annual growth rate of 2.5 percent was used, which is the lower recommended value by the City of Renton. In addition, the estimated trip generation for the approved Oakesdale Business Campus project has been included in the 1999 traffic volume projection. Estimated traffic volumes for 1999 are illustrated in figure 6. The traffic volume projections to 1999 assume that background traffic growth will remain constant until the Oakesdale Avenue SW extension between SW 27th Street and SW 31st Street is completed. Figure 6 also illustrates total traffic volumes in 1999 after the proposed HomeGate Suites Hotel opens. 98081\REPORTS\HOMEGATE(08/06/98):jc 6 , ,, • . ...‘, Oakesda/ SW 1th St J Vek _ * 1 ‘,••,>„. SW 16th St. l*dill(miiiailir , -4--4- -4- -4- 1. * V:\ ',,?k ""..--..._.__4-44-4--'a-4-'4'2'1• „/ \ \ •,.. I-/ '.•,. "10 c 4, /'I ) •;::, - 01'4° __...- •.,,/' •\. 1,-.:' 0.• V 1r •\ lonsre,. \ I ; c 7 ck•4. ! 1 11W+ I 44 1..1 7400 I Id. -4 I 11 t not to scale , , \ S.ungacres WM ,1 ,7 , • — \ ,•., •,.• , n 1 ,• ( : !.i. ,. . / 181 +4—1415 1 . i 1 .. .. .. 11 i•/ . /,' = 1 \\ t 'E't ' 1591•—ii. • ' 4 ''t : '5,' SW 27th St. _ .- •E'i _______________________ • 2 cb • •• •T '' o ''.=',/'',/ .-;•• :t +41—1415 Q.,i: / •' 0 7/ gs .1. • I :I 0-I '• ( ( ... 7 I, 1591 -.-11...; I . , 0 1 : , lt; 1 ;7 \ , , N. •N '' I ' '''s• \\ , .7 . SW 34th St I 3 ' 11 lb 1',./ , II , +41 ,.., 176 31 14 i:. —999 : 77 i I',.-.1 t er 1,1 _ . /z . 1312—10.'i,; 240 59 80 I- I i' Iiir 202..‘,1 '1akgsjai SW 41st St. --- cm co i•I II l \ I , I 4 t 4', 1; , 1 0 cr \\ \ 3 0 73 4 .,.41--0 a I SW 43rd St , . Project '''''‘ t r•- : - - '- s,:.::::.•-• + 7 Site •, 0 107 71 c,- I , ) ; . . i ';r Figure 4 , 40110 ENTRANCO Existing Volumes -Weekday P.M. Peak Hour l 1 .. ..,,' OakeSda/ SW Ith St T1 ...._._.,- , •„% .s, ,,,-:T...,',-.::..._..; .\ •-:.'% ••‘-.;, /:./ k -*--• -*--4.:0."."- OA 171 Illir A SW 16th St. viriste,•, , 4. 1 V. I. 1 I T T li. + 1i 1 l a ,..).-.... = '1 . .n, ., . )-\ not to S.Longaues\kaY I,) \ ,i scale • \-‘,......„_.. 1 . 5 '87 ..4- 0 , ! •.,, , ...: / /./ = ( E - + _,,T ..=. s. ! . 14. 0—... l•I 1,3 1 7 • \ 1 :.-.•, ..„, ...., i ='1 , . +,; SW 27th St. . , • .---..............____________.....___.... • ''. I 1 . . I I i , I + I I. 2 7 7 ' 6 T i ) t 1 1 I Ii!' ( ...... . 7.- 3 , ISW 34th St , \ ' . .L. '-t• 3 1 ]i i i I k•0 7 I i 2 0 0 '1.1—7 CO i,. a.. 4 i J-41 t I-.., ! _, , ill ca cp 10—O.,. 2 0 0 . : 1 1 It I i l i SW 4Ist St. -:,- 1 i / I.!, .•:.:::*.:06-i44**sY%:;:•:•:::::::*: -... .:-.:•.:-.....:•.::.::.:•.•.• k. ., 1, 0 ct 0 0 0 2 0 ; .I1—0 o TT SW 43rd St ,„,,f 1 k.,,, r o , .. )) .:. I I , Project 1 0) ,'"\ t er I I 1 7 T Site 0—0-:! 0 3 1 c•-• c.... + i ..... i I ) + T , I Figure 5 - 4:3011 ENTRANIFO Project Net New P.M. Peak Hour Trip Assignment , • s • / oakesda/ SW 7th St I , i x•, 6 ifre. \\ 1. i s'A I \•'-,-\ ‘•;\ )c -*--..-..,....-AA-A-- ,,\ '1•': '',e / 0 11:11 IF . •?,\ lot SW 16th St. . , . -1. il Agilliiihk V\ i i 1- = not to scale i ,.... \i 0'1 j.—, .."ce S.Lortgacres,"4 ; ='" + '1 of ;• (7) (8) •0(5) .1. 7 i I« 0 0 •flli 1480 1.1 . 4,0,/ 1..„ i:, (1467) / I 1 f f a' 181 . ' — = i/ t. I T = (5)0 j. . . .:. *.Z.1.1. , , • 11 ..,Ff;J. • , ..,+ 1. f f SW 27th St , 7 •-•:., f « : // 1 t 2 . '. 17) 17) % It.,. 4. It 0(6) f f, •C' /e' / + If 4.,/ 1,4,...,:.:4111. 1460(1465) 4 :. IT ..f. . (5)0•ii a.. lra (1672)1664.-0. .. , 1--; .• 4 f+ . ,I \ 1 f t '1 : SW 34th St I a. IT \ 1 II 3 . r / 1 11 (183)(60)(99) ,,,.. 54(54) , 7, 1.1. 181 60 99 '-:-01—1029(1036)1 . .. Ari 1 L:i r 13(8) j 4.IT 1 i l'....., t ,...- - _ _, 116)112 'f. . . . .1. m • ' c T,i. :, • . 1.-- i (13(55)1345—lit (.225250)(6655)(82)82 208)207..), ., I f.: 1 . i .,t . , . . I SW 4Ist St j'T 'Y.;Aliligicii,00iii6%...:-':.::-%% 0.2 I / CO if( !' «... ..., . , \\ (o)voi)03o) ::, io ow 198(198) CC " 0 , ; SW 43rd St ,„,../ 4 I r j• Project , •••) I T I 1 i- T Site (58)58—41"'•.! 43 110 72 — (88)88•,.‘ f, (43) (113)(73) ..... : ---,..... t Figure 6 ENTRAPI 0 - Wilhout project trips 1999 Traffic Volumes With and Without Project Trips Cl1 (0) - With project trips Level of Service Analysis SW 43rd Street/Oakesdale Avenue SW A level of service (LOS) analysis was performed at the intersection of'SW 43rd Street and Oakes/dale Avenue SW.for the p.m. peak hour. The LOS analysis was conducted using the principles of the Highway Capacity Manual, through a computer software package, Signal94. The concept of LOS is to rate intersections operationally based on the average stopped delay per vehicle traveling through the intersection. The LOS of an intersection is ranked from "A" (low delay) to "F' (delay exceeding 60 seconds per vehicle). Three scenarios were analyzed at the SW 43rd Street/Oakesdale Avenue SW intersection: • : existing conditions • ' 1999 without the proposed project traffic • 1999 with the proposed project traffic Results of the LOS analysis are provided in table 2 and the LOS calculations are provided in Appendix B. The intersection is currently operating at LOS C, with 24.3 seconds of delay. By 1999, with the addition of the Oakesdale Business Campus, the intersection will fall to LOS D, with 33.1 seconds of delay. With the addition of the HomeGate Suites Hotel project trips, the intersection will continue to operate at LOS D. The intersection delay will increase 3.8 seconds to a total average delay of 36.9 seconds. Table 2 P.M. Peak-Hour Level of Service Summary 1999 Without 1999 With 1998 Existing Project Project Intersection Delays LOS Delays LOS Delays LOS Oakesdale Ave./SW 43rd St. 24.3 C 33.1 D 36.9 D SW 43rd St./West Driveway n/a n/a n/a n/a 23.52 D2 SW 43rd St./East Driveway n/a n/a n/a n/a 22.42 D2 1. Delay is measured in average seconds of stopped delay per vehicle. 2. This is an unsignalized intersection. The LOS reported at unsignalized intersections is the worst case among all of the calculated movements(typically one of the stop-sign controlled,side street approaches). It is not a valid indication of the operations at the entire intersection. 98081\REPi RTS\HOMEGATE(08106/98):jc 10 Site Access Two new driveways on SW 43rd Street, as shown on figure 2, will serve the proposed hotel. Both driveways will provide full access to the site so that no movements are restricted. An unsignalized intersection LOS analysis was performed at the two driveway locations for the p.m. peak hour (see table 2). At unsignalized intersections, the LOS is generally analyzed for the movements that are required to stop, because these movements will experience delay. In 1999, with project buildout, both the east and west driveways will operate at LOS D for movement out of the site. MITIGATION The City of Renton has a traffic impact fee for new development, which is $75 per daily trip generated by the project. At 562 daily trips, the traffic impact fee for the HomeGate Suites Hotel is $42,150. The impact fee is based on a developer's proportional share of the cost of transportation facilities identified in the City's Comprehensive Plan needed to serve new growth and development. In addition to the $75 per daily trip impact fee, the City of Renton requires additional mitigation for projects not included in the City's Comprehensive Plan but required to maintain the City's level of service standard. A new signal at Oakesdale Avenue SW/SW 41 st Street was identified as additional mitigation required by the Oakesdale Business Campus. The HomeGate Suites Hotel will owe a proportionate fair share contribution to the cost of the new signal. The calculation for the fair share contribution is based on the projected 2010 traffic volumes at the intersection, which are provided in figure,7. In 2010, 1,930 p.m. peak-hour vehicle trips are expected to travel through the Oakesdale Avenue SW/SW 41st Street intersection. Based on the project trip assignment shown in figure 5, six HomeGate Suites Hotel project trips are expected to use this intersection in the p.m. peak hour, or about 0.31 percent. The cost of the signal will be approximately $100,000. Based on the fair share percentage of 0.31 percent, the HomeGate Suites Hotel development will be responsible for approximately$310 of the new signal's cost. i I 98081\REPORTS\HOMEGATE(08/06/98):jc 11 '', • / OakeSdai SW ith St. )4k, * i , SW 16th.4,___4...St.....-• .-4". .-., 7.1'.:i"...,1.1:::,. ',..\ ',„,,k -,#...,. • ...4.--."- i:-'1 •,,.... -4- .i+4114(imihcbr •, ',,.:::\ '-?, \,,, -,--,__ --4.1z.--.-4.- tr. ..:./ .1 • tp 1r ! t• T ,\T PPP' .11(1111 1 II + I i (I.A • I ,. • 1 ,f:5^ t not to scale S.Longaaes WrlY 1.— t 11 , i 1 If -:' .1 -.., '; - 11' L'...• • , i •''''ii•, , •g.1 ' ,... ,.. , ......... 1 . :t,s. ,---. t. .t'- SW 21th St. \ n1 T . , t,,- \ ., 1 ,4 SW 34th St. 3 .i.. 1 'I (60) (1150) (40):':' k`..10(50) 110 690 10 12;...4— 580(590) / ,„,r,./ 1 t.„,,!:,, I(180(240) —, I , ,.. t l 4%- 7/' / ' 1.17 .7.4•' I 1 I (0)80 it \ t c' .. , i ii 1T o (950)960--b.:';'.480 190 50 i (370)7/0... :(430) (410) (20)f , i ., I i ' , 1 4- SW 4Ist St. . i) , t, 4 " •. 1 1 , 11 1 ....................,.... ,1 10(40) 0 c't \/,, t ,, _ 690 50 ..:',•"4—'11 01) * •-,., , I .I. SW 43rd St „kJ 1 %.,,,- r 120(70) ,...7__ i I Project Site,.. .). (88)88 .;(43) (380) (160) tFigure 7 AD ENTRAH 10 0 - Volumes prior to opening 2010 Traffic Volumes Prior to and After the Opening , 1 (0) - Volumes after opening of Oakesdale Avenue Extension APPENDIX A Trip Assignment SHEET NO. OF ENTRANCO JOB NO. -PROJECT Hero le�f: 1/0-el CALCULATIONS FO_R 77",P 4s • MADE BY DATE CHECKED BY DATE �9 D/ta- , e'2/ ,14 1 - .. . . oI i 2 LI; Us c-1 ,rL, 16 GJ 7 SW `-I Z cd' T- S S ' 5 I V [ o A S� r1 cyr�fir;; �Yl ve I �[.f�E'r;'"�i OC !/l c,-eGf� n ,/c)IuwC Or\ 6c' �idG/e �j/u/ (CC <1,) • i ' APPENDIX B LOS Calculations Aomegate Suites', Hotel 08/05/98 SW 43RD STREET/OAKSDALE AVENUE SW - 07:33:50 )vl (1) OAK43PM:FOR WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR EXISTING 1 I :SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.2] - Display of Intersection Parameters Key: VOLUMES -- > [ 176 31 14 I WIDTHS .0 24.0 12 .0 v LANES 0 2 1 / I \ \ 47 . 0 0 /. \ -- 999 24 . 0 2 77 12.0 , 1 / + / 8 12.0 1 North 1312 24.0 � 2 -- I 1 \ I / 202 .O 0 \ 240 59 80 Phasing: SEQUENCE 16 12. 0 24.0 .0 PERMSV YNYN ,OSTTIME = 3.0 sec. 1 2 0 OVERLP YYYY LEADLAG LD LD II ' i IIome ate Suites1Hotel �! 08/05/98 SW 43RD STREET/OAKSDALE AVENUE SW 07:33 : 54 vl (1) OAK43PM!FOR WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR EXISTING sIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.2] - Capacity Analysis Summary ntersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) .79 Vehicle Delay 24.3 Level of Service C -q 16 I Phase 1 I Phase 2 I Phase 3 I Phase 4 I **/** + + + e A- -I- + ; ++++ / \ <+ + +> I <++++ V ++++ A A **** V ++++ orth <* + 4> ++++> ****> I * + ,+ ++++ **** * + ,+ v v , G/C= . 318 G/C= . 069 G/C= . 000 G/C= .481 G= 28 . 6" G= 6.2" G= .0" G= 43 .2" Y+R= 4. 0" Y+R= 4. 0" Y+R= .0" Y+R= 4. 0" OFF= .0% OFF=36.2% OFF=47.5% OFF=47. 5% C= 90 sec , G= 78. 0 sec = 86.7% Y=12 .0 sec = 13 . 3% Ped= . 0 sec = . 0% Lane Width/ g/C Service Rate Adj HCM L Max Group I Lanes ' Reqd Used ' @C (vph) @E 'Volume' v/c I Delay I S 190%Queue I SB Approach 14.2 B THi LT 12/1 24/2 ' . 134. 081 ' .329 I 908.329 294 ' 1028 373 ' 241 16 l .234. 043 ' 14.2 13 .3 I B B 1105 25 ft' B Approach 27 . 6 D+ I LT+RTI 24/2'12/1i ' . 109.366 l . 329.329 i 943 231 ' 1364 02 ' 163 267 l . 153.884 ' 13 .8 36. 0 ' *D ' 71 234 ftI wB Approach 12 . 2 B I LT+RTI 12/1 ; ' . 075.368 ' . 080.492 ' 1723 16 11124 11229 0 ' .. 688 066 i 12 . 2 24. 8 I B C 1325 ft98 l 1 _B Approach 33 . 0 D .510 LT+RTI 12/1 24/2 ( . 114 'I .080.492 11623 94 11125 ' 1786 66 1 1. 623 008 I 31.7 33 . 1 I *D+l 102 ft*D 576 l OMEGATE SUITES HOTEL 08/05/98 ..W 43RD STREET/OAKSDALE AVENUE SW 08:29:23 bvl (1) OAK43FWO.FOR WEEKDAY PM PEAK 1999 W/O PROJECT bIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.2] - Display of Intersection Parameters Key: VOLUMES -- > 181 60 99 I WIDTHS .0 24. 0 12. 0 v LANES 0 2 1 \ 54 . 0 0 / I \ /' \ -- 1029 24.0 2 112 12. 0 1 / + / 8 12 . 0 1 North I 1345 24 .0 ' 2 -- 207 .0j 0 \ \ I / 246 65 82 Phasing: SEQUENCE 16 12. 0 24 .0 . 0 PERMSV YNYN OSTTIME = 3 . 0 sec. 1 2 0 OVERLP YYYY LEADLAG LD LD 1 it __OMEGATE SUITES1HOTEL 08/05/98 SW 43RD STREET/OAKSDALE AVENUE SW 08:29:27 - ,vl (1) OAK43FWO.FOR WEEKDAY PM PEAK 1999 W/O PROJECT SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1. 2] - Capacity Analysis Summary ntersection Averages: Degree of1Saturation (v/c) .83 Vehicle Delay 33 . 1 Level of Service D q 16 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 I Phase 4 1 **/** + + + + + + ++++ / <+ + +> <++++ v ++++ A ^ i **** v ++++ - orth <* + 1+> ++++> ****> 1 * + I+ ++++ **** * + I+ v v G/C= .327 G/C= . 071 G/C= . 000 1 G/C= .469 G= 29.4" G= 6.4" G= . 0" G= 42. 2" Y+R= 4. 0" Y+R= 4. 0" Y+R= .0" Y+R= 4. 0" OFF= . 0% OFF=37.2% OFF=48.7% OFF=48 .7% C= 90 sec ' G= 78. 0 sec = 86.7% Y=12 . 0 sec = 13 . 3% Ped= . 0 sec = . 0% Lane Width/ g/C Service Rate Adj HCM L Max I Group l Lanes Reqd Used I @C (vph) @E Rate' v/c Delay S 190%Queue l oB Approach 14 . 1 B LTTH 12/1 242 12/11 . 172. 145 l . 338. 338 l 301 959 l 1378 76 l 110 1 l .291.261 l 14 .2 14 . 0 l B B 1194 fti B Approach 37. 2 D LT+RTI 24/2 12/1 , I . 111.404 l .338. 338 l 980 215 11098 282 l 171 273 i . 156. 968 I 13 . 4 52 . 1 l *E l 74 236 ftl WB Approach 13 . 3 B LT 12/1 12/1 24/2 l . 075. 379 l . 082TH .480 I 1628 68 l 1128 l 1269 l . 064.730 l 24. 6 3 13 . 2 I C l 425 ft22 l B Approach 49. 0 E+ I LT 12/1 12/1 ', I . 137 1 .082 11628 11128 11124 11..879 1 55. 5 l *EicE+1 146 ftl 1 JOMEGATE SUITES HOTEL 08/05/98 SW 43RD STREET/OAKSDALE AVENUE SW 08:31:39 )v1 (1) OAK43FWP.FOR WEEKDAY PM PEAK 1999 W/PROJECT SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.2] - Display of Intersection Parameters Key: VOLUMES -- > 183 60 99 WIDTHS . 0 24.0 12.0 I LANES 0 2 1 \ 54 . 0 0 / I \ -- 1036 24. 0 2 /• \ 116 12.0 1 / + / 8 12. 0 1 North 1 1355 24. 0' 2 -- \ 1 / 208 .0 0 \ 252 65 82 Phasing: SEQUENCE 16 1 12. 0 24.0 . 0 PERMSV YNYN ,OSTTIME = 3 . 0 sec. 1 2 0 OVERLP YYYY LEADLAG LD LD i i i I JOMEGATE SUITES ' HOTEL 08/05/98 SW 43RD STREET/OAKSDALE AVENUE SW 08:31:42 - Ivl (1) OAK43FWP.FOR WEEKDAY PM PEAK 1999 W/PROJECT SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.2] - Capacity Analysis Summary ntersection Averages: Degree of ; Saturation (v/c) .84 Vehicle Delay 36. 9 Level of Service D 'q 16 Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 **/** + + + A + + + ++++ / \ <+ + +> <++++ vA ++++ A **** v ++++ \ orth <* + ,+> ++++> ****> 1 * + + ++++ **** * + !+ v v G/C= .330 G/C= .072 G/C= . 000 G/C= . 464 G= 29.7" G= 6.5" G= .0" G= 41.8" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4. 0" Y+R= .0" Y+R= 4. 0" OFF= . 0% OFF=37.4% OFF=49.1% OFF=49. 1% C= 90 sec G= 78. 0 sec = 86.7% Y=12. 0 sec = 13 . 3% Ped= . 0 sec = .0% Lane 'Width/ ' g/C 1Service Rate Adj HCM L Max Group Lanes Reqd Used @C (vph) @E 'Volume' v/c Delay S 190% Queue ' SB Approach ! 13 . 9 B LTTH+RTI 12/1 , ' . 172. 145 ' .341. 341 ' 304 969 ' 1381 085 ' 283 110 ' . 289.261 ' 14 . 1 13 . 9 ' B B ' 194 ft21 ' B Approach 40.7 E+ TH+RT 24/2i . 111 . 341 990 1107 171 . 154 13 . 3 B 73 ft LT 112/1 I .413 I . 341 I 217 I 283 I 280 I . 989 I 57.3 I *E 1241 ftl WB Approach 13 . 7 B LTTH+RTI 12/1 , ' . 075. 381 ' . 083.476 ' 1632 ' 1131 11279 2 ' .. 742 063 ' 24 . 6 13 . 6 ' C ' 425 ft28 ' B Approach 55.9 E LT+RTI 12/1 , I . 140 1 .083 1 1632 11131 11129 1 1.. 076 896 1 58..8 1 l *E 1152 ftl s HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2. 1d 43WDRVWP.HCO Page 1 Center ForrMicrocomputers In Transportation University' of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N-S) WEST DRIVEWAY (E-W) SW 43RD ST Major Street Direction EW Length of Time Analyzed 15 (min) Analyst BVL Date of Analysis 8/5/98 Other Information 1999 WEEKDAY PM PEAK W/PROJECT Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 < 0 0 0 0 0 > 0 < 0 Stop/Yield N N Volumes 5 0 1467 5 8 7 PHF ! .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 Grade 0 0 0 MC's (%) SU/RV's (%) CV's (%) PCE's 1.10 1. 10 1. 10 Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2 . 10 Right Turn ;Minor Road 5.50 2 . 60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6. 50 3 . 30 Left Turn Minor Road 7. 00 3 .40 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 .1d 43WDRVWP.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 774 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 561 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 561 Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0.99 Step 2 : LT from Major Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1549 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 253 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 253 Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0. 98 Step 4: LT fromMinor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1552 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 108 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0. 98 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.98 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0. 98 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 105 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) SB L 9 105 > 170 23 .5 0.2 D 23 .5 SB R 8 561 > EB L 6 253 14. 6 0. 0 C 14. 6 Intersection Delay = 0. 3 sec/veh HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 . 1d 43EDRVWP.HCO Page 1 Center For ;Microcomputers In Transportation University ;of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N-S) EAST DRIVEWAY (E-W) SW 43RD ST Major Street Direction EW Length of Time Analyzed 15 (min) Analyst I BVL Date of Analysis 8/5/98 Other Information 1999 WEEKDAY PM PEAK W/PROJECT , Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 < 0 0 0 0 0 > 0 < 0 Stop/Yield N N Volumes 5 0 1465 6 7 7 PHF .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 Grade 0 0 0 MC's (%) SU/RV's (%) CV's (%) PCE's 1. 10 1. 10 1. 10 Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2 . 10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2 . 60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3 . 30 Left Turn Minor Road 7. 00 3 .40 - II HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 . 1d 43EDRVWP.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection Step 1: RTfrom Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 774 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 561 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 561 Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0.99 Step 2: LT from Major Street WB EB , Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1548 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 253 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 253 Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0. 98 Step 4: LT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1550 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 108 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.98 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.98 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0. 98 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 105 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) SB L 8 105 > 177 22 .4 0. 2 D 22 .4 SB R 8 561 > EB L 6 253 14. 6 0. 0 C 14. 6 Intersection Delay = 0. 3 sec/veh W:rx ' J4 .° " ' Cr, - Geotechnical Report for Prime Hospitality Corporation Homegate Suites Hotel Renton, Washington PHOS000i August 1998 • a Outstanding Professionals. . . u Outstanding Quality DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. I I ` I'- I Prepared for Prime Hospitality Corporation 2426 Southview Drive Alamo, CA 94507 Under the direction of Mr. Matthew A. Miller, P.E. David Evans and Associates, Inc. 3700 Pacific Highway East, Suite 311 Tacoma, Washington 98424 (253)922-9780 PHOS000i August 1998 rl DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON AUG 1 8 1998 RECEIVED gca DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. August 17, 1998 370o Pacific Highway East Suite 311 Mr.Angelo Stambules Prime Hospitality Corporation Tacoma, Washington 98424 2426 Southview Drive Alamo, CA 94507 Tel: 2S3.922.978o Fax: 253.922.9781 SUBJECT: Geotechnical Report Proposed Homegate Suites Hotel Renton,Washington Dear Mr. Stambules: This report represents the results of a geotechnical investigation performed at the site of the proposed Homegate Suites in Renton,Washington. The evaluation was performed by a geological engineer from David Evans and Associates,Inc. (DEA). Our evaluation was performed in accordance with the scope of work that included an evaluation of the subsurface soil conditions. Upon conclusion of our investigation,we were to prepare a report with recommendations for the foundation design of the new facility, and to identify the potential foundation design for use in the final design. It is our understanding that the proposed building plan will include the development of a motel/hotel. The building will be a three-story wood-frame structure which is U-shaped. Each floor will be approximately 25,000 square feet. The open courtyard will face to the west and contain a swimming pool. Surrounding the building will be asphalt surfacing for parking. The site will be served by pubic utilities which are in place up to the curb at this time. Site Description The property is located in a portion of the NW 1/4 of the NE '/4 of Section 36,Township 23N,Range 4E of the Willamette Meridian within the City of Renton,Washington. The lot is known as Adjusted Parcel N, west of the intersection of SW 43rd Street and Oaksdale Avenue SW, on the north side of SW 43rd Street on the survey performed by Barghausen Engineers. At this time the lot is vacant and the elevation of the lot has been raised by the placement of 3 to 5-feet of fill. The lot is bordered on the south side by SW 43rd Street, on the east side by an adjacent vacant lot, on the north side by Springbrook Creek and the west by a residential parcel. The total area of the lot is shown as 135,582 square feet. It is our understanding from the review of past reports that the area to the north of the site, across Springbrook Creek,was an old scrap metal yard,which may have extended to the subject property. The topography of the site is relatively flat with the higher elevation along the north portion of the parcel prior to descending into the creek channel. Springbrook Creek runs in a southwest to northeast direction along the north property line and is approximately 20-feet lower than the general elevation of the site. • FOOb - Outstanding Professionals. . . Outstanding Quality GLOOM.ID N ALLIANCE vUUU INC. At this time there is limited vegetation on the site. Where the fill has been placed some sparse weeds have developed. However, along the north edge of the property there is a thick stand of tall grass along the banks of Springbrook Creek. Utilities which serve the site are located along the street at the south edge of the property, with the exception of the stormwater. The stormwater will be directed to the northeast to connect into the existing storm drainage system. There is a power pole located at the southern edge of the property. We understand that this was the remnant of a private power line which served the lot on the north side of the creek. The overhead power was relocated underground sometime in the past and is still in existence. The location of this power line should be noted during the excavation of the site. The power line appears to run north from the power pole and the transformer located along 43`d Street. Subsurface Investigation On July 22, 1998, a geological engineer from DEA performed a subsurface investigation at the site for the proposed Homegate Suites. An auger advanced drill rig provided by Geo-Tech Explorations was used to place four borings to a depth of 30-feet. The borings were located near the four corners of the building footprint. The borings were placed utilizing a hollow stem auger. Samples were taken at 5-foot intervals using a split spoon sampler, and Standard Penetration Tests (SPT)were performed each time a sample was taken. The SPT is performed by driving the split spoon sampler 18-inches ahead of the auger. The number of blows required to drive the sample tube for each 6-inch increment is recorded and the last two increments are combined to for an N value. The N value is an indication of the relative density of the soil. See the site plan for the specific locations of the test borings. During the investigation we encountered three predominant soil types. The upper 3 to 5-feet at this time consists of fill placed to raise the elevation of the site at an earlier date. Below the fill is an insignificant layer of topsoil typically less than 6-inches thick. Below this level for the top 10 to 15-feet is a fine grained,poorly graded silty sand,which is underlain by a fine-grained,poorly-graded black sand which increases in coarseness and density with depth. These conditions were consistent across the site in the areas investigated. The fill at this time is limited to the top 3 to 5-feet,and consists of sandy silt with some cobbles and includes construction debris. Duringthe drillingwe encountered barbed wire,rubber, and concrete below the surface, and manhole covers,plastic pipe, concrete rubble and other miscellaneous construction debris at the surface. The fill does,however, appear to be relatively dense and in a firm and unyielding condition. From review of a past report for the area,,the test pit excavations located on the subject site did not reveal any noticeable amounts of debris. Below the fill the native soils consist of a brown to tan, loose silty sand. The standard penetration tests within this soil type resulted in"N"values that ranged from three to eight indicating a loose condition with the potential for consolidation with the added loads as well as a potential for liquefaction during a seismic event. The black sands are located at a depth of approximately 20-feet below the existing grade. The black sands are typical of the Renton Kent Valley. Their grain size and the density become greater with depth. They are also typically poorly graded,meaning they are uniform in size. Groundwater was encountered in all four of the borings at a depth of approximately 14-feet below the existing grade. This elevation may vary however depending upon the season at which they are measured. From review of the past report prepared in the fall, the elevation of the water table appeared to be consistent with the current measurement. 2 �(g)VVV i INC. The attached boring logs present a detailed description of each boring. The relative density of the soils indicated in the logs was interpreted by the N value as determined during the SPT testing. Recommendation Due to the presence of a significant depth of potentially compressible soil, it is our opinion that support of the loads from the preliminary design could result is excessive post-construction settlements if no remedial site treatment is performed. There are two methods which may be utilized to support these loads to reduce the potential for post-construction consolidation. These methods include preloading and pile support. The difference being the time constraints of the construction schedule and cost. In the area of the main building, it would likely be more economical to preload the underlying loose sands using a preload fill. Following the preload the relatively light loads of the building structure and slab-on-grade could be supported on conventional spread footings. The time required to consolidate the upper loose soils may be reduced by the addition of a surcharge load above that needed for the proposed building weight. A further alternative would be the use of auger cast piles to support the given loads. This method,though most likely more costly, would facilitate the immediate placement of the foundation without the need for a preload. Site Preparation '. I Due to the nature of the existing,near surface fill soils,we recommend the removal and replacement of the thin organic layer at the surface prior to the placement of the preload. The amount of further stripping to be performed will depend upon the final height of the finished grade of the building pad. The excavated amount should be enough to provide an adequate depth of structural fill beneath the footings as stated in the foundation section of this report. Structural Fill The suitability of soil to be used for structural fill depends primarily on the gradation, the amount of organics, and the moisture content of the soil when it is placed. Imported fill consisting of clean granular fill is recommended if these conditions cannot be met with on-site material. Clean granular fill should consist of well-graded sands or sand and gravel containing less than five percent fines,based upon that fraction passing the#4 sieve. The structural fill should be placed beneath all foundation within three feet of the bearing surface. During construction the excavated material may be used as backfill or in the preload above the elevation of the top of footing,provided it can be compacted to the standards set forth above and is free of debris and organics. All fill material placed below the finished grade elevation shall be placed in maximum 12-inch lifts and compacted to 95%maximum dry density(MDD)according to ASTM D-1557 Modified Proctor method. The remaining preload may be reduced to 90%. We recommend that a representative from a qualified testing lab be on-site to monitor the placement of the fill and verify that the required compaction is achieved. Fill specifications for the preload material located away from building areas and subject to removal after preloading could be less strict. A general pit-run type of material would be sufficient under these circumstances. However,if the preload fill materials will be removed and re-used for structural fill,the preload soils should meet the gradation recommendations appropriate for their final intended use,and likely weather conditions at the time of placement. 3 gUUU INC. Preload Fill Recommendations Preloading will involve placement of a temporary load on the ground surface, in the form of an imported fill material. The temporary fill weight to be used should be equal to or exceed the proposed structural loads such that much of the settlement will occur under the preload,prior to the construction of the proposed structure. Based upon preliminary information,we anticipate the continuous wall footings loads will range from 1500 to 2500 pounds per lineal foot. Without remedial treatment,the soft material encountered in the test pit explorations will tend to consolidate under the applied loads, and the floor slabs and the foundation elements could experience excessive post-construction settlements. To minimize post construction settlement, we recommend that the site be preloaded prior to the construction of the building. The effectiveness of a preload depends not only on the size of the preload,but also on the time that it is allowed to remain in place. Assuming a unit weight of the preload fill material equal to 100 pounds per cubic foot(pcf), a preload fill height of 5-feet should be concentrated specifically in the building areas to simulate the building weight. The height of the preload should be measured above the final floor elevation. The preload fill should extend laterally as close to the building lines as possible and should be sloped down at an angle of no steeper than 1H:1V. We recommend that this preload be allowed to remain in-place as long as possible,but no less than four to six weeks following the completion of the fill placement. The longer the preload is allowed to stay in place the. more complete the consolidation process will be prior to construction of the proposed structure. A surcharge load in the form of additional fill could also be added to decrease the time required for consolidation. It is essential to monitor the progress of the preload settlement. Continuous field, time rate of settlement data will p �' enable us to refine our settlement predictions and the requirements for the preload duration. We recommend installation of a series of settlements plate monuments. The settlement plate monuments should be installed prior to the commencement of fill placement to monitor settlement. Initial settlement plate readings should be obtained immediately after the placement of the plates and prior to placement of any additional structural fill or preload fill. Settlement plate readings should be taken at regular intervals of at least one reading per day during the entire filling and loading period. Upon completion of the placement of the preload these measurements may be reduced to three times per week. Shallow Foundations The proposed structure may be supported by conventional spread footings and isolated column footings, assuming that the preload has been in-place for a sufficient length of the time. However, it should be verified that a sufficient prism of structural fill soil remains in place once the preload is removed. The footings should be underlain by a minimum of one footing width or 3-feet of structural fill whichever is greater. The structural fill should slope laterally at 1H:1V away from the edge of the footing. Where soft soils remain a greater depth of fill may be required. The continuous footings should have a minimum width of 24-inches and individual footings a minimum width of 36-inches. All exterior footings shall be placed a minimum 18-inches below finished grade. The following criteria should be utilized in the design of the foundation: Maximum allowable bearing capacity(compacted structural fill): 2000 psf Friction against sliding: 0.35 4 c' 9,(:§UUU INC. All footings must be founded on compacted structural fill. The foundation should not be founded directly on the loose native soils, existing fill, or structural fill which is not properly compacted. Excessive settlement may occur if this is the case. It should be noted that due to the presence of soft compressible soils beneath the site, long-term settlement may continue for many years. However,the preloading process should reduce the magnitude of the total and differential settlement. Piling Based upon the information from the borings,piling could be used for the support of the structure. Piling would have to extend to a depth of approximately 25 to 30-feet in order to bear upon the dense sands. Based upon the conditions encountered it is apparent that the piling would have to be at least 16-inches in diameter, and would have a capacity of 30 tons per pile.Final design parameters may be provided if needed. Seismic The site is considered to be a Zone 3 seismic classification as per the Uniform Building Code(UBC). According to • Table 16-J of the 1997 UBC the soils on the site should be classified as Sd. Due to the presence of saturated sands on the site there is a potential for liquefaction. Liquefaction is the result of the loss of shear strength in soils when they are subject to saturated conditions and seismic shaking. Typical soils that are susceptible,are those which are poorly graded(all one size)and fine grained, such as that found on site. During a seismic event severe shaking may cause liquefaction to occur and differential settlement may result. We estimate that settlement during a severe seismic event of magnitude 6.0 (0.17 g)could be as much as 5 inches.However there are ways to minimize the differential settlement of the structure by stiffening the foundation. Paved Areas It is our understanding that nearly the entire site outside the building pad will be paved. In these areas, minimal surface preparation will be necessary. However it is recommended that the area be proof-rolled prior to the placement of the pavement subgrade base and any soft spots removed and replaced with a structural fill. Since there is a potential for the site to be under construction into the winter months, it may be beneficial to create an all weather surface around the site. In order to allow for easy access around the building perimeter it may _ therefore be beneficial to use ATB (asphalt treated base)as a base rather than crushed rock. If this is the case the parking areas should be surfaced with 3-inches of ATB and the heavy traffic areas 4 inches of ATB. If crushed surfacing is used four inches should be used in parking areas and six inches should be used in high traffic areas. In both cases the asphalt thickness should be a minimum of 2 and 3-inches respectively. However, prior to the placement of the pavement section there should be at least 12-inches of compacted structural fill beneath the pavement sections given above. All materials should conform to the specifications given in the Washington Department of Transportation(DOT) Standard Specifications for Road,Bridge, and Municipal Construction. 5 ��UUU INC. Slab on Grade The interior slab on grade should be supported on at least two feet of properly compacted structural fill. This will serve as both a compacted mat for floor support and a capillary break as long as the fill is free-draining. We would further recommend that an impervious moisture barrier be placed beneath the slab. If the slab is placed upon a properly compacted base, a modulus of subgrade reaction of 200 pci may be used. Limitations The information presented in this analysis has been prepared using generally accepted geologic and engineering practices in use at the time of our investigation. The use of this report for the proposed development assumes no warranty expressed or implied for the geologic and soil conditions described. The information;presented is applicable to the subject property only, and should not be applied to the adjacent lots. It is expected that the on-site soil conditions will reflect our findings,however, some variations may occur. Should conditions be encountered that cause concern and/or are not discussed herein,DEA should be contacted to re-examine the conditions encountered with regard to the proposed development. DEA would like to thank you for the opportunity to assist your project with this geologic report. If there are any further questions regarding the information presented,please contact us at(253)922-9780. Sincerely, DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES,INC. 71( Matthew A. Miller,P.E. w A w Geological Engineer o� as• /�� 3. MAM:jbh . Attachments: As noted. I �'o���302.S. V w�4,, ,q SSIONAL E14 P:\p\phos0001\9 8120.1tr � *'t PHOS0001 ' EXPIRES. 2/0 i 00 I i I 6 FOUND BRASS DSK RI • CC".MTN Y t CASL RK 219007 It N0.T \EC SUN.SEWER YANN0.E SSOK]F.0. YO 0,33. RIM. 7D( C M.E SE t R 0.]O' A.ISTS(Y cote.L t..) Or M SE CORNER I/ AT 100-CNANNNa Nw 1/1 K TWA M[./1 SEC.L. SS IL. I A L...LAL rK STORY MANHOLE NM.N.SS f . .t10 L•CONG . [.S.• L'LONG.. �11 , , ..,„1\ ¢ D• GWgrd1( 111111\1\ \ \ I- I tDADrAr \\\\\I\\ \ 1 \11011 \\ I �\ I 'I 1111\\ \ 1 \ \\\11I\l�l \\ \\ I \ I I I I ,o O \\\1 1 1 11\lll \ \ r ( \\ ji j I II I �, aiI SEE I UNE AD.USILENT NO. \ \ \ / w a1r(r C •nwr1 1 II I I I I _ .Ft,K.E DATUM NAa was. \11 I\ I I BENFJYYOC an Nr anDN ran 1 11 1 I 1 •1 \l lk \1 l Nil I B-' ^ FOUND f.KA1t DISK.1 SACK O< • lyll \\ \\\ 7� am'--�\ - --_�_ e-4 I _ �51711.11 � I� ,S MOMAKENT_ �� CditAIONDASNOICO 1.\ STORM MAN MANHOLE 1 il�11 I \1\\\\\ \ `� \ \} \ I t I/� I III I AS NO= o =nOt S NOTED 111111\ 1 \\\\ / \\ / / t ' I �IOIVAIAT II 1\\\ / • \\\1 • I wN, A i II lII 1I / . _1 I \\\`r__ _J/ �— 1 III —1R VALK � """'°r I#�1-1'OVA..\-. r_ \ --- I Q - ir 1 I —UP— UNCENNI K NTA UK -SS- SOA A T LNE a } \ 1 L\ "..... • ...... ---\� `` M0..ROAD 1 EEN DING —SD---- STOIIY GRAM LSL r-:\\\\ 1 \ \ �'� ` / ' sIII —,� — ,t rGa�a IK Al NOlm •\�\\1\\ \ } \1 I B—p \'�` •--•............................ -----•••••• xODfaO LIE AS NOTED CONFER TREE u NOTED 0 \11\ \\ \ •\ . \ \ ® _ :_____.\ *r KOAp•--•-------- ---- I : uss au MDN D.SALK MIN SO/.DING LOCATION r EOOE OF.ATEK-, �� __�-__ ■ PUNCIWARK.STAYPFD \1T1`\\\ \\ \ \ \\\\ ■I■• ■I■ • 8-3 -�I ' lIl If a=ufl u YWKItE \\\\\\\\\\mil\• \\\\ \\�_ — MOMIiii ���® g /I I t: '111, uia BASK TYPE 2 SS UK o`fo \`\\\\s \\\\\\\ \ ,\\\ \ \\e/' \ 1 S .�i1Tr,I WM FIRE'� \\\\\\\\\ t 1\\ \ K / / `\ ; �" d I r • TT VNMDKNIi %OQ \\\\\N\ �. \\ /�� _ / / -- L t\E[r II MANHD(E Q'F p. �r/\l/�/\ \ \\\ _�—_ / I • s IIYIYCONG LIt NL TS. Z G 1\/\\ \l \ / —- J .I . MO-CHANNEL $ s \\\�\�_\ \\ ,. - 3 f-1 • \ '�_V_ ka • wA I. - y __ \s0:MUM, 1:'PUN[ 1 N IIII Ii I n --- ig•no _- -_ - uora.,ESIE00,_ \\\\\\1\ \\\-\4 1 \\\'S•--\\ F •///_--- � .+•II III--- POINT Of BEdWING , \\ \ ��� rauNO s/K•REerry h'--Co — — • AM uP.Ls,B 11111� 1 --------V. �, .•ROOD MICE It I I II d I I I Homegate Suites Soil Boring Log , Borehole #1 i , Location: NE Corner of proposed building Logged By: Matt Miller , Start Date: 22-Jul-98 Driller: Geo Tech Explorations • Completion Date: r 22=Jul-98 Surface Elev.: NA Method of Boring: Auger Equipment: B-65 Standard Penetration Blows/ft a _ s ,w's o SPT eiow.rs• ~ uscs Description of Material . f .10- 20 30 40 a H -' u i I I Medium dense silty SAND with gravel Construction debris at surface I I FILL I I 1 i 5 i '" ; ' , I 4/4/4/ Loose mottled fine grained brown to tan SAND *'� : (8) $; i ,, 10_ 3 ',-'-?: 3/3/4 Sieve (7) Loose mottled fine brown silty SAND S`n 4 ',;:14,." _ !*::,: Water at 14 feet NE 15_ yc' 2/2/2 Sieve (4) Loose saturated fine grained brown silty SAND 5 ,_'+ , 6 'r', 20_ 2/3/5 Sieve (8) Loose fine grained saturated black SAND . 1 25 - 8 3/5/9 Medium dense fine grained saturated black SAND _ (14) I j — y , 2 inch layer of peat at 28 feet 30 2/2/7 y- 10 '' (9) Medium dense fine to medium grained saturated black SAND No heave 11 1 I i I I Homegate Suites I Soil Boring Log i Borehole #2 n: NW Corner of proposed building Logged By: Matt Miller ate: 2-Jul-98 Driller: Geo Tech Explorations :tion Date: i 22-Jul-98 Surface Elev.: NA 1 of Boring: Auger Equipment: B-65 1 Standard Penetration • Blows/ft • d s�a I 18 i - uses Description of Material -, 10 20 30 40 y y 1q s Medium dense silty SAND with gravel s Construction debris at surface I FILL • I Tried to sample at 2.6 ft-sample tube bounced -I I Auger picked up large quantity of barbed wire fencing-had to switch leads 1 l I i 4/4/5 ".="":k i (9) Loose mottled fine grained brown to tan SAND ..' ,. s s 2 : i i eM s. 3 2/3/3 (6) Loose mottled fine brown silty SAND 4 Water at 14 feet IM 1/1/3 1 (4) Loose saturated fine grained brown silty SAND 3 - s 3 2/2/4 (6) Loose medium grained saturated black SAND 7 3 3/6/10 Medium dense medium grained saturated black SAND / (16) I g 0 i •• No sample 6 feet heave 1 1 , 1 Homegate Suites Soil Boring Log Borehole #3 Location: SW Corner of proposed building Logged By: Matt Miller Start Date: 22-Jul-98 Driller: Geo Tech Explorations Completion Date: 22-Jul-98 Surface Elev.: NA Method of Boring: Auger Equipment: B-65 Standard Penetration Blows/ft F srr elowel8• o g m g a INI USCS Description of Material 10 20 30 40 y y Medium dense silty SAND with gravel Construction debris at surface • 2/3/3 FILL (6) 5 2/2/2 (4) Loose mottled fine grained brown to tan SAND _ 2 p"q i -- _ ifs I 3 E 10_ 3 ',y•'z 1/1/2 `tt (3) Loose mottled fine brown silty s� I SAND Water at 12 feet I _ 4 15_ 3/3/4 (7) Loose saturated medium grained black SAND _ 5 —- 6 :: 20_ 5/8/12 (20) Loose medium grained saturated black SAND 25_ _ 8 • 3/6/13 Medium dense coarse grained saturated black SAND _ (19) - 9 30 - 10 No sample 8 ft of heave 11 1 1 Homegate Suites Soil Boring Log Borehole #4 Location: SE Corner of proposed building Logged By: Matt Miller i Start Date: 22-Jul-98 Driller: Geo Tech Explorations Completion Date: 22-Jul-98 Surface Elev.: NA 1 Method of Boring: Auger Equipment: B-65 1 — Standard Penetration Blows/ft P • • F� t _ s srr an i E uses Description of Material 10- 20 30 40 y a 3 u - i Medium dense silty SAND with gravel i Construction debris at surface _ I I FILL I i _ 1 I I i i — i I 5 _ ': i I I 6/3/3 Top 3 inches into FILL ground up asphalt s r.:` 1 I (6) Loose mottled fine grained brown to tan SAND _ 2 ,:` I I 'N:i — :',.. `t i 10_ 3 ir':':z 2/2/3 ','. .. i ( ) Loose mottled fine gray silty SAND gr-E, __ 4 '''' I i Water at 14 feet 15_ 1/1/5 (6) Loose saturated fine grained gray silty SAND — 5 6 : 20_ 3/5/7 (12) Loose medium to coarse grained saturated black SAND 7 25_ _ 6 .: 5/7/13 Medium dense coarse grained saturated black SAND (20) _ 9 1 30_ 3/3/4 .10 ;'' :`': (9) Medium dense coarse grained saturated black SAND 11 2...._. Grain Size Analysis o 0 Sieve Openings in Inches U.S.Standard Sieve Numbers Hydrometer I tO 01 3 .V2 3 1/2 3/8 #4 #8 #16 #30 #100 #200 270 • * 9 1I P • II --1 . 100.0 F,, F+ • 90.0 A • al • --80.0 PX • N • i I I • 70.0 Z • • 93 ; I I . I I , so.0 D . N in i_i • • 50.0 ia., 0 • - : I Ii i I 40.0W m a 14 o _ • • —30.0 0 m i -• • i 20.0 w . N • i , • 1 10.0 W i Co 100.00 10.00 1.00 ' 0.10 0.01 0.00 N Grain Size in Millimeters •1 Vi Gravel Sand Silt or Clay V o Coarse Fine Coarse Medium Floe V ;C. (Unified Soils Classification) g Project Name Homegate Suites o Project Number 066-98119 Soil Classification SW: Brownish tan sand w/fines (B-1/15') Krazan Testing Laboratory 0 01 c Grain Size Analysis sis to 0 U.S.Standard Sieve Numbers Hydrometer i Sieve Openings in Inches Y t0 CO 3 1-1 1 3/. 1/2 3/8 #4 #8 #16 #30 #40 #100 #200 270 100.0 l ; l • 90.0 4 • • ,80.0 PX • • . I ' I , i . 70.0 D • ; z • I i co N I 150.0 0 � i 2 n • UJ H i • • I C.) D j i ' � ...40.0CC a m it) • o . • •30.0 co 0 , • . • . I , • 20.0 �, i • Ii 10.0 cri trl • 100.00 10,00 1.00 0.10 . 0.01 0.00 I-+ ^y Grain Size In Millimeters N z cri Gravel Sand Silt or Clay z LCoarse Fine Coarse Medium Fine 0 J CO (Unified Soils Classification) ig Project Name Homegate Suites 0 Project Number 066-98119 Soil Classification SW;Silty Sand Krazan Testing Laboratory o .P