Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA98-129 7 O Q 0�I =� •1 • k.• 1 \• I AR NANOLNG YNO AND DUCT EDON). — Valley I STANDARD CREAM OR TOP/Kµ1. ■IMI_ •_ Medical 91,-� _. __f. _ ___ _ ._ __ - - - 072A2 TYPICAL V-GRINS Center / SCORELMS Center 07242 COS FINISH.STANDARD NOSKTI1 EXISTING GENERATOR B.ROM BEYOND A CREAM COLOR 620_ - • 03120/03310 MEL CAROM DARK BRONZE 07EU9RNG,SIANORAp HD5P1T ,o 08410 pLOYWY AND CUSS CY51D1G �Y Warehouse SECOND ROOK MAN CQOR '� ENNAN 000R AND SIOElGN1, + ES and W arehoUIISe 76'-6 lOP NM PANEL ,n„ DARK BROrIIE HDSPOAL 74'-0 1/2' Yrs s ``s11 / i CKKTINC CDYYDmC3TEN5 BOKaIIES1lOE1 R �.�. _� �i.\�; ,D REMAIN V. I1 it II I I'i II I -� IIIIIRMIIIE I ran NEZIANNE CMRY 1 MAX L U M 1111 Ir' 65rRSf fL00R i \ I I i Os371 GUARDRAIL.DARK BRONZE BT-6 I �r I',? _ \\/Tl-�1elliii : I ( I `+ 03300I05310 N[22RNaC DEN NM / y__ "�� I I I I t SEE PUNS PANELS 00R NVLCE[. (=$LING ROOOA'S.DARN BRONZE 1 ER071NG PRECAST PALL PAIOLS. STANDARD HOSPITAL CREW COLOR-- EfI51NC 2R51 1L00R ENTRY. AAR Am DARK 9NNNW.NIE EXISTING GRADE 10 NW. .Ay lot SEE STE PUN FOR SPOT ran,am.o r..0 R ELEVATIONS.iYaGll ntR SOUTH ELEVATION I.1.1miJ „,..;; w"; � 1/N'1-� 02 s 8 16 • • L0 VA`1�p' `A`1I�y' 1, •A y1 1 1 7n}<11a�c 9RSEyO . `• I `• `• . / )• — 07520 NC1N CORING.STANDARD N05gL4 CREAN COLOR Doc A81988.199D A iCY/KIEI �! I I •I11 I ` OTN7[BS V-GROQ2 Dave MP Plee Amor.; MY +9O-g SOOOEIPNCs I I I 07242 EES rm15N,STANDARD NOSPUN CREAM COLOR lniios 07620 NELA1 1USNRG.STANDARD HOSPITAL MINI COLOR.OVER STRUCTURAL CONNECTION EXISTINGI I CAGING CONCRETE'Wl PANELS STANDARD COLOR _ C1021NG GENERATOR 81 8116 BEYOND NON MAD ROd+ q 1Y I✓0SPI1AI 76'4 A,TOP/LK01NC PAWL I ti R 74•-01/T !_ I I.. h -i ri_ I 4 I '6Jl J� EXISTING CANOPY. DARN IWGQr • II 1 0 I I e , 5� --- — I i • � ��LI I � ' BSQ, 08U0 MUTED NY 0026 NORM/SOUTH 20 RAC DARK.RCNZESTAND I I I (MUG LCNOIG 10 REIINI. ELEVATIONS ass2,1 1/2'on.STANDARD M� STEEL PPE GLNRORAIL DARN BRONZE _ 8 WOR AND SIRR. 033W CONCRETE10 S100R KIN LARK BRONK WALK SLOPED TO MICH EXISTING EXISTING GRACE 10 REYAN, EXISTING SKULK TO REAM SEC STE RAN TOR SPOT ELEYaM.mW . I,)NORTH ELEVATION �u RAJ 9CA12:V8=1-( 014 B - 16 F 07212 VS WAIL FINISH,STAVIN)N05PTW GRIM COLOR aN al I' �Ij :I� I: (!: a 07620 KW CpWG.4A�le NosRnu CREAM COLOR (!) �!: .!: •• AR "WOK_Um u�D.DILC_1 BEFW� //p 1 SINdRO ND�IIAL[RL�aI[IXOR I 1 —1 1_07610&ff rIASIMC NS0.STRUCTURAL CO1RktipN. j I 1 •• ♦• 1 I ! 1 I I swoop N05PRu.CREpu CliLtli I I I ♦• Valley fj9CP/6 L ! I` t 4 _ fi - CenterMedical EXISTING I aweE i E„ I I 1 • jI f BOLDING 5 J �� _ I - , • I 1 .~ l SECOND ROOR 18 ! ! 76•-01 +1W/TNSTRC Mal — - - _ 1« y�— IS and Warehouse 65R �[NIRI 6 II ill 1 1 ' II ' 1IIIIIIIIIIIjj; INM • MAHLUM i EX6f60 CONCRETE 1AL1 PAWS. j I I 1 07717 IYPCAL V-GRWVE I 1 I ,,i A 1 1 r i N i — — STMOORO HOSPITAL CREI.Y COLOR 1 I I N I SCIXRLNE 1 1 1 1 ie,, fsSrLOCR •OPR CEETP-- 1 I —IZX151RY'GOPTTTRORr t- i - BONZE 1 1 BASE FLASNNG Dux BRONZE! 1 I I I I 05521 GUAWM 016)'BROINE EXISTING GRADE 10 REARM SEE sat PLAN FOR 5P01 CLLVAR0N5.1Y6CN EAST ELEVATION IYmi 11,1 SCALE!1/e'o1•-0- 0 2 4 6 16 N•..N. IOU f..,o R Ira. e Ole - Yc:::, 'r'."'1 (TO17% ipl {o% /7N iil CI) (i) iI.1 (;) i i i i i i I I I I i i i i i i i i i i i i i i ! ! i i i i i i i i ! i 1 i i i i i i i i i i ! i ! i i i i ! i i i i 07212 ERs rROy ! i ! i ! i i ! 07620 YE7AL COPING SWORD 1 1 WAY CIXW R I 1 1 L I 1 I X co N COLOR 1 i 1 i I i I I I 04570 ALUM WINDOW OM(motor A^l�DeJectlfterken 9716130 s e l0P/wul 1 - I - I I 1 I i I C6900 1 INSULATED GAZING BAR ✓W � 9T-9 'I -I- I IlNPIDAppwIL WA i ` • L 07670 YCIAl BASE fVSNNG i �> / STANDARD CA[AY COLOR lafi� j I g. SCWNO r100R 1 ! 1AC1U11[S 76•-0•• TOP/EXISIIN6 PANEL j j' I I L'I I 6i iii _ 1 ` 1 EBNLONC a-D 1/r a Z -WAIL �': a e T • A/OEN.PARIPFI dg 1_ 1TIIII-1 ; ; 1 ill. III !Illc• I G n rl —, , ! ! I IIli' I ! 111111116illllll611'i ! I I I 1 1 � i � t — I ! ! i I i ' : . j I I - "..--n--o..-] eE nASi ELaOR I. 1 � I I ' 1' I I l L F sr_S 11 L , 1 I I ‘ ! i u H t--- 1 $4606 1kZZANNE AND 1.•- P-.-�j�;.. I \ i i i CANOPY azraNm.DARN eaaaE I i i i 1 ! i i -i i EAST/WEST 1 EXISTING GENERATOR BUILDNO ETISING PRECISY WALL PAWLS I EXISTING SCUPPER AND I I I EXISTING CAM AND CNODwS! ELEVATIONS ,l I I 1 I SVN0N70 NO14'I1A1 CREAN COLOR I D0w1✓SPOUT TO REWR1— 1 I I DARN ROWIIE I STANDARD CREAM CDLCR EXISTING LIGNTNC 10 RERAN, TrLi 07620 SCIRPER AND1YPIC/d DO'ANSPOUT TO OVERFLOW ORAN,TYPICAL 1 IOCAON0 E1610G WAX 70 RE00.31, SWIM CAEAY OUR SEC 011E PLANrW WM CO ELEVATORS TYPICAL WEST ELEVATION �J I_ - J (NA co /K) �1i �1i Ali I I I I •. I •� I — -Valley • Medical Commshsoito m moJ\ Center ! %�\ I'p1 /plNI. ip\ a I.I 3.A 1 il tLA—_MIMI 1:151118Mt I I I I 1 i I I I 1 I I IS and Warehouse I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I ]Expansion I I 1 1 I I 1 1 ""`F""°"� OER(f: I WET ((EIL7: I a �/ 1 I I I 1 I M .. ® M A M L V M ® I ® ® I I 1YI I 1 kk ...are.rr• .� I 0-1y Q 1 r-'-'-T--'-1 r'--"T---'-1 !r----T----1 1----T----'1 II 1 1 II 1 aria 1 k 1 1 A 1 I Co 1� - I - - I - 1 I a® I I I p 1 I I I I I 1 �i®ill I Lam' elfili/P: 1 !i II Ii i tiI 1 I ! ``[ !O1 I� I ® 1 _ �/ 11 1'T II I I it I it 1 y p I I� i -III --_— Q aCttRlN 11 ICE q S. i I I i I I 4 1 5 I 1 I I �J}� e._._._._._._._ ._. ._._.I._._._1._._._._P-� _._•L._._._.L .L_._._.L l._._. L 11._._._.L _._._._._._._._._ _._._._._._ ._._._._._._. .T...2i II Ir ® Y YII I 1�____r _� I�____r_._._}._�____r___� II-____l___� I :.I 1 i__-- 11 3� d'og 1 I I 1 I VI 1 SrNR 11 2 R001 ! = rwr w� !—� _. LOBBY 1 it----T------ IF----r----1 I----*----1 ir----T----- i ....w I E I I 1 I 1 i I I fu 1 I I !I I I !1 I a I I !1 1 I ! r.�SOo n ha.ORB I __ QED !I I !I I r I r I 1 ! 11 =T� ! II I 11 I I ; I I I I 1 �• ! E I11 I1 O CRC .meow 1 i WaaONIG110N5 I 1 I I 1 N «;:wn Diu.u:f �il! Irau I ' I i I 1 I �F 4 ! V I I 1 I I I I ! I I 1 I I nowt 1 i ! ! ! ! ! COi i ! ! ! ! ! i i 1 ELECTRIC 1l t1 1 t1 1 I I ►y_,��,� QM -1 $ 1 �TV I 1 I I I I I I I 1 1 I 44Er 9716110 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1:665 1990 Men82/6 I I I 1 I I I I Dec BP Gab* WY 61617.19a1r94w41,WA 1arYeca: Q � SECOND FLOOR PLAN ®NORTH l Y. SCALL:1/6•61•-0 O P A S 16 ga SECOND FLOOR FLAN th a 4 L /N\ /-1 IK1 'I ‘I'' 'I I I I I L ' SWLR 1 1 ♦• ff1101 _ .. •. -Valley I - Medical 1 I EYERa11"v Center aNERA1oR — rp1 4g1 TC\ •D• "E1 "E1 `G1 1 = URGENCY I •• •• \ SYf CNBD LOB 11WrY1 BETWEEN OWING ').1 Il I liii I _ IIS and Warehouse - Ewa fYEI[EI RECR+NG IA QM ®I RECEPTION z I ® rjffl- s M A N L 11 M 12 __-- I 1 rEL 11 ypOG II 1 1 WAREHOUSE BleillLi .-.. .. . . fpryT FLOOR I ®P i -I - .IV/ c•I'la 1 000.1. 00 ' 6' _ I f _ E _ _ _ _ ! I =- E / SSICYS@ ~- BURStERh I _ _—_ • _____ ___ _ _—_—_�—_--_ 1 _ • T I II WIRY'�_� f STAff ROW PEW R ' CC•PUTER �I 11 IJII I aKW W. ® ® f ® ^ 1 �� --- IT I „I i : I II 1 N age.4 3. 1 O I// I 7nfnfNbebm 9716190 Dore M4 02%19W Dine SNP OeteG DC ' Site AWAPPR.sl,s@A • Raritan /, E FIRST FLOOR PLAN NORTH RMII rr /PURORM NA YouD� /=' r r �' - +--- --+---J FIRST FLOOR wzmn AND FA]:27-ANINE fEi PLANS 1 r g I — T I NCR Wl Will WM' • rJ I orr NSW'SCOW MEZZANINE ENTRY PLAN ED -- ----- 2. SCAM:1/e'=1'-0" NORTH 2I / ' is 1 II II —{■ MAN —I _.�._._._._,� . -Valley �' , Mlle,r.saN Sr= ; -" Medical I r _ " Center FL �.i-e., 1 I , ° ItS and Warehouse I / Expansion " TREE—CUTTING I\\ y •_•_•_ I.ND TREES ARE TO BE RCYMD WRNG TAT PROJECT. • r- 09.14 WO—'NOG L,t T t/ i I Am ielliFF:" • 'Oa!N ' I i LANDSCAPING \�4 I 1. I.(MPG IAIOX00 C TO OWN MESS Drat INO Nm, �.:.a Igr[D 000011 . N= w. �� I 9 2.AT I(?ZNII(PMCOMVC OfOR OALL R(Yq( mm No ,a "TVV. [MTMO LMOOA IND AS FURRED FOR III IOONNIIC Man 1. IIn���e I II . ENTRE.ND WARMq ML EE REOURLD R NERNME.OPRRAcTOR SNR.L FUME WSW OR ,.1.\� � �,_p D.._p PROW ICI TO Wra ARM AR MDT UNDER NERAI"r. ;YL«n/ / . 1 2 II a IpI GENERAL NOTES I I • I pap I.MUIR UM6 SIIPIM ON SIZE RAN N �. i G LOU 7 GQD7NQED UIUI16 PM. 1, Ib°aN 111111111 I►,� I IIIII:G�:::. lc 1 � �-). IIIIII I aLyon:1 ' . • " • BUILDING DESCRIPTION Me PzejosN� 1.10 20,MS ,INIII J — ..1. NO 7/" I N� ND"SECOND FLOC+ 10.670 3 MIMI X!^'�.+ Ran _.. I ..�1Rf.9:.T,0—.. _ _ bides _ Eama,DrgN,rot sw s,JDR6 AN/7 I �,. la1 1 O, 60A05S/STOTAR OOOFANCY ART Don°a(4) MOORED'(S) a 1EGENQ .=.= ONTO Sim I SEINER IOC = SWUM.= EXITING SWUM SERA ENE 0 EXITING"NER UE 1 a —--— PROPERTY LNE 11 8 LANDSCAPE PLAN e SITE PLAN Sr1EPLAN 9CNI:I'=I0'-0' .TALI-E"=2O-7 INIMI ® 0 10 20 ,10MOWN NORM ® 0 5 10 20 L .....p. liz, ./............. ..J....w.,..?..t...1_/..,.../ ,,, :.':',....r..:.44:"7::171...,...1."...:11'1,-1:::i::....'0....i:::....,:::::',...:41z.'..:...;'.::::::;.....17.::::::1 :1:1:;41;.:„.".,' :::::- I— .. .. • -- :-...:. .:::- ...- ::, ..z. : :: f , —1 :';'fill, /-::::------0. ----it. 1 ) • ._._ ..* .4.:::::::: i':: A :f;0 - ...- -.7' /..::-:.- ::'. i 1 i - ir. - „. 4, .., .‘,..„ • e. . .. ,. 111 ..1„,.......1. /. ,....1119/;......Air:116 .. Lt„...,, lipap.." .." a.:::::: .,:„.. ,ri.:,.::: ,c-; .- :7:: ,•:: .., .....: .7.7/, i .,1' Medical Center 1 ..,,....(0140, ,_ t„ ...,.......:;1141, ."try '• .,. %"' P.,..a.„.':::' .7.:4—. .:::: 0 :: :1:,:li.:.: /.:". z:::: :Y.' . - i a - .. 1 ..ir.0- .,-,41: p , „.„.... P .. ......... • - /i" . " -..--z., o•*. ",.... \ ••• -----, - °' • • ''':4/ --/ illiiiib ::: I•';'1 / IS and Warehouse \ • I t___„,„, ' if /, -...1,:. . .1 :::: ii:.:::: 1 \ ' T:F 19 VILEARGED ./ SITE/ :::) / it#411:1°0' t i.:..:. * 44 MAHLTIM •..A i::::: \ / 'e .1 ellOW: \ V(/‘,..4144.1 Mt. V/ ...t.t,. -44.41P411P., .' ,...0 -ha i..,... / ;.•..„ , //IP,r•\1 -.. \ • \ cu). , \..,:g':-a;*.ial . <11-ii..-A.,r% ''41 034;i34-4.,1*t„,„... !• -.4 29,-z 1 i i 3.• p , .,. ! • '.** i'•• / :.: / /,, 4 ...... ,.....„ _ \ 1,,/_-:.- _ ,_ ,...,-,,, T . c-- I iito , . . „„ 1 'MI PUN 11::::::: ..... ,,,:.. ...... stItle: ,',It'Sp.'il 1 4'.: i ' ..../.40. , , .„,,„,, ._,. „.._ ....,,,,, , . PC:iii.: V ei0V, • '4%1Nit, A a I, AI , '40 ,3 \ I/iv,., . •:g Air '' .64 4 !1E1)1111111%1411447,41/1 lit I * ,fc,.... GENERAL NOTES I.DOING MODS SNOAN ON SIR PLAN DI LEV .11 ';'0.D.7.,7.,. . •••IDDr.:;74/ AI* . rt-t,.., OF A GENIRAIVID Ultfl45 RAN •DINo ill*6 1 ° • -." 1•44;. /... ollik/ 1 I. 2.LOVING CONFODAS OHM ON[MIXED WI FLAN 1 \ /,.. •:' ...;::?vi;„,, ..... 4:),A..t II* C)C11, /1 -.P.41011tr-./..;.i, sr_ •41*4W* 1'1' /0 'Q*$, ,..4 i 0 - , •' If \ ,, i;* .:-,..-i,, ---,,,,.....i..„,ito •* I 4sisisiii ,I;,.. 0 a 0 i .1\...,„ ,,,i• / ..--f . BUILDING DESCRIPTION . 0 0 PAD/ADA...DI=ONAT A...971,41.30 . •.. •;:• " •; ',..T:.!INIIIN.•••i/ -,..0 V/4,0 Dom SW Oecird: DO j. \ - l' rS • "' //I iilt 11- 4--4 -:.,-1 ... . 1 It 0° ° ...'‘''''N'4? SDIARADANDAIod.NIA \lig:„. • :i 4;il z,,_,„,,,,A,..r, ....,,,,,t, , ,, , e- , '/ 6. MIK TARSI FLOOR NEW SUM FLOOD CONSTRUCTION TYPE 12200 SE 12670 SA 9. Raab= L... . ••." (Y/ i i j./ ' 505.455/STODAGE OCCUPANCY B/51 •:4.i,D2-.;.e .• * ' ..'../.. * • .k9 ';, /I 0/,' at Z.T.:**Ii '-'78•8•8:1•1...„„.,.... 0 I.°0 rr''i / 14;11' 1 • 0 0 0 • ',,' • .I I / \ • 'T• '''„„'::,q, /*it: 0 ::::'.°," / 0 \., V*,*A• o0--/ l!i t Vit°C • ..•..1,-, *0 0..„-•,,„,,„....7-, .tt,e •/,/A,/l LEGEND i • = DOW 510FH SODER UNE . - - - - COSMO DATED LK - _Ii*.ki la ---------:;:-..•-•-.../ 0 ' ' 'I7 I I/• \ ..‘""7•,. 5501"t:• -",-Tr."'')i.-% * --------:::_---:•---' (E3(9 I: I ' - - -PROJECT RODENT(1.11•T 1 ..k Wag'i•-• & °0 •• . . --.) kb,..,.k. '. 4=--------_- • '' ." 9°°.0 •::::-I:::: ilk* 0 dror-'0 o o 0 a*co' i i i ' LOT 1 DOWNY LK _.,...._.......... ... ... ... ... ... .., ... ... LOT 1 SITE PLAN 11 „ , E ---)R117 Sot4t - ita31.I Strivt.:: -..--- - - --- --- - ‘: A e koj ii._... SITE PLAN 41 L, , •:.,,,,:iir i:-.. ' ' :ii...,,::::i...r- II _. . NORTH AO•iweil _ 0 50 100 2a . • -__ ED moil WM aoOHffiW�PIld A / 11C114 OCOMI4913 N \ ---- p i ha 4 s ,.. ...0) '(% \ .,-- 0D� c:,...„,,, \,............ f Ayj iI za1 . 611011fm 0 01 ...,,.. C--� � fic - . ,,," v� �� t �, I l c+opul7(�)117 4n \\.______J tz. �r 1 PI ev, 1 , 1 r� , ,� .1" .... \ ...,4 r . cl3 MI OM i L \ � M y a .4 .. .:... 11/' ..••''.... . \ \ ..••- I 110\ % ciaaa4 A ....-'t:/-. ,2- \11 26e101pIll j .PM SII r / ?ft am^ 1��� I a •,,,41 -1 • \ . . ....- \ J3�U 3 ,... y� Lam'`"T� �r .. ' / _J L — . .. . .. , 0 0 CITY OF RENTON NA Planning/Builcling/Public Works : 0 -- . 0 , a 0..i.,40 — 5 . Li5 South Grady Way - Renton Washington 98055 to 1.-. OCTOC I 3'9 6JJ Cr 2.:Ertm ••• •5 2 * ; sc - ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED l't i'71.4 9 a :-.J41,-, 1 :,.::s Ortil4gP Si Es4 p ciish A%i: NOT DELIVERABLE AS ADDRESSED UNABLE TpFORWARD ,k) NO SUCH# ' : INSUFFICIENT ADAZSIVIPS TED-NOT KNOWN/X- REFUSED - T.., _____ MOVED,LEFT NO'ADDRESS DI)ric,--:,:,. 77:a 1241 OCT 1 9 79:9.8 4 .1'...-..' • . . . . . . . q, DECEASED •UNCLAIMED BOX CLOSED NO FWD i.1 Cs i 0 ‘,.,., i.-:.' 4 ' "c--7-'--- . • VACANT .NO.RECEPTACLE INITIALS41- ' -RTE#--2.....-,n2:'' 1.1;.fr,',....' ,i3...":;)''' '. 1173 C'','')7C ; ' ....\') _____, Valley Medical Center 400 South 3rd Street • • . , . • Renton, WA 98055 - CiTy o in F Eng r A L..-,Tr\ t • . 0.;eer LI p. : . _. .... _ - ----- ! : .,. i_..r.4,.t. 'Irriral , . • . ., -t— ; .!-: VI R 1 T i:1.--:•• - ) , . , ) iflFiESSD 4 . •), : II / ..-.) th . IIIIIIIIIIIiiiilitillilitilittililillimlitilliiiiiimilil • . '...;•1 0 W N 1 • (131 .IAT.• r4 4,0011 , . . . . . . •. . • • • . • • • ' . • R0-i11 PACIFIC NOR' C/O GEORGE P �` 3131 S VAUGI 2vta , set "C' Cz1oets AURORA, CO 312305-9012 PUBLIC HOSPITAL DISTRICT #1 VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER 400 S 43RD ST RENTON, WA 98055 312305-9078 1 VALLEY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 17930 TALBOT RD S RENTON, WA 98055 312305-9135 ZZZ L L C 13510 SE 50TH PL BELLEVUE, WA 98006 312305-9025 RENTON VALLEY 79 ASSOCIATES 17900 TALBOT RD S RENTON, WA 98055 312305-9134 STEVEN SHIMIZU C/O VALLEY MEDICAL DAY SURGERY CENTER 400 S 43RD RENTON, WA 98055 761680-0010 THE DOCTORS PLACE 17800 TALBOT RD S RENTON, WA 98055 761680-0040 761680-0030 VICTORIA LOMBARDINI • 10113 UPR PRESTON RD SE ISSAQUAH, WA 98027 761680-0070 SPRINGBROOK BUILDING C/O EXECUTIVE HOUSE 7517 GREENWOOD AVE N SEATTLE, WA 98103 761680-0050 _ F RE TON .Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor' Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator - October 29, 1998 • Ms. Susan'Fore Mahlum Architects 2505 Third Avenue#219 Seattle;WA .98121 SUBJECT: Valley Medical Center IS and Warehouse Expansion • Project No. LUA-98-129,SA-A,ECF Dear Ms. Fore: This letter is to inform you that the commentand appeal,periods have ended for the Environmental • • Review Committee's(ERC) Determination,.of.Non-Significance - Mitigated for the above-referenced project. No appeals were filed on the ERC determination. This decision is final and application for the appropriately required permits may proceed. The applicant must comply with all ERC Mitigation Measures. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at(425)430-7270. - For the Environmental Review Committee, rb(5/,(,„ fi,-.127572) Lesley Nishihira Project Manager cc: Valley Medical Center/Owners, . 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton;Washingtori'98055 _ airThis oaoer contains 50%recycled material.-20%nost consumer - . ^. Mr A H L U ✓t arch i t e c t s October 15,1998 Ms.Lesley Nishihira Project Manager,City of Renton Planning/Building/Public Works Department 1055 So.Grady Way Renton,Washington 98055 Project: Valley Medical Center Information Services and Warehouse Expansion Project No.LUA-98-129,SA-A,ECF Subject: Parking Modification Dear Lesley: This letter is written to provide additional information for the purpose of obtaining a parking modification.It is my understanding that the parking modification is necessary for the city to approve the warehouse project with no new parking.stalls added.It is the hospital's position that no new parking stalls are necessary since the new floor will provide storage for material goods and office space for Information Systems staff who are currently on campus.Most of o the staff members who are not in the Information Systems office in the warehouse now are using surplus patient rooms as office space. Attached you will find excerpts from the 1991 master plan documenting building square footages for existing conditions and phase 1 additions.All of the projects identified as part of phase 1 (see page A-7)have been completed except for the Chemical Dependency Unit,and the Hospital Third Floor West Expansion.The only other project completed on campus which 0 was not identified in the master plan is the Cogeneration Facility(5,000 sf). 0 We have calculated the parking requirements for the hospital based on 3 categories of use per 4-14-8 of the Renton Building Regulations.The three categories are 4-14-8-F.1 Medical and Dental Offices for the medical office buildings,NW pavilion and radiation oncology,4-14-8- F.3 Hospital for the main hospital building,and 4-14-8-C.2 Warehouse and Storage Buildings for the warehouse and cogeneration facility.The calculation is attached. Also attached is Valley Medical Center's most recent traffic management report to Metro, which shows a total of 2,256 existing stalls on campus.Since the number of stalls currently on o campus is greater than the number required,it seems reasonable to allow the warehouse addition to proceed without additional parking spaces being added,and without a more elaborate parking analysis being performed. 2505 I hope we have answered your questions.Feel free to call me with any further questions or Third aye. comments. SUITE 219 Seattle,WA 98121 206 441.4151 206 f 441.0478 VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER MASTER PLAN PROPOSED MASTER PLAN Phase I Development Plan (1991-1994) The facilities identified for completion in the first phase of this Master Plan are already in or near the final stages of planning and design. There will be a number of remodeling and renovation projects in existing buildings at various times throughout all three phases. These internal projects which do not increase the total square footage are not listed in the Master Plan. New construction is listed below. These projects have exempted from inclusion in any future E.I.S.. For Phase I, the proposed additions are: Facility Additions Phase Area in Gross Square feet (rounded to nearest 1,000) Exempted Remaining Hospital Use Hospital 3rd Floor West Expansion 10/ 0 494- Jow.c Ambulatory Care Chemical Dependency Facility 1,3, 00 Kul- 4o14 Medical Office Building . 109,000 Radiation Oncology Center Expansion 2,000 Pad for Mobile Lithotripter 0 Northwest Pavilion (Level 1 In-Fill)* Total 124,000 Support Facility Cafeteria Expansion 1,000 Office/Classroom Building Addition 1,000 Total 2,000 Parking (none this phase) 0 Residential Care (none this phase) 0 Total Site Structure Addition (this phase) 136,000 * No square footage shown....this is infill of already existing space counted under existing conditions. • Mahlum & Nordfors Architects • Page F-9 • --November, 1991 r- 3 sv c- c 3 Re Z 8.11,101310011 LORD(T,LLIGT ROAD$WIH t - :).. . , ...... ,,,.. , . 4 f_. v ., 0. ._ A ., V—� : .•"1 I L 1 I 1F PK0 ` te a (I , rti et - ' t\tc) ' -a ais 1 * --"Ir—Li 1 r: J • co i_ l 4' n Q<3i� 4 I �� ! Legend r ..., :a,a Q r- c, M Chemical Dependency "" 'E t N Mobil Lithotripsy Pad ..1 Perri 0 Office/Classroom Building Addition rT7 A) P Tunnel KI � Eti Q Ambulatory Care Building f9 ipodlO R Northwest Parking Garage Expansion .0 'T1 • 5 ROC Expansion a T Hospital Third Floor West Expansion • Z ' 0 \...........„... !1'I R 'C • r Z PHASE I DEVELOPMENT.PLAN 1991-1994 o VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER c u, 6- w S_ C 3 Ro z - 0 a. 0 SPRTIODROOK ROAD(TALBOT ROAD SOUTH) (n '.--;, _- PPM . .Lj1_ • -• NOTE �1 , E 3 PODOTONNM E C -\ � P �J • t( 5. REPRESENTED NTH ADARNED LINE. = \i•-t ?i- - - 4 --31.6 f? --O:'\ :.: 0.7).:‘,. , RCS{ ���� I; I lg i I n } a "`;aliz< (�JL- � op, iz:( „°�?"A.' SOI""l 1 sti. "'- ._ f • k'. :.: �._ /�• �': '~ 4hS STRF vv�a `5 y ;',. '3'i;`217, •,^` y„/ h: ''•, '4(; \ j Q Fr I'1'I MI ,� ..� � ._-. --•�,rc �M<lt'a7)mil •... '�.':?r �� T i v u l., 4 v., ..•,<T,. is- 11,1 --o- �. / j, X __.---7. M \,,..-:, -1 e) v. .B r.:�T.a f' "mot nui O ;5.n9 O Legend �_ r L• C • a, �1s3 'R 1 co 6 N�`— dpe1-17 • A Hospital ('� Ir) FEDn' p� )� -�-n �y ? Y Ile B Talbot Professional Center m Wf4.� �' 1 1 C Valley Professional Center North(Chin Hills) 0 Z .7 /` ( ( -1,Y D Northwest Pavilion Z DJ ��� IQ �', E Hospital Warehouse Q RI (rq © F Northwest Parking Structure(Phase I) x f� 21 0-1� - G Radiation Oncology Center(ROC) '� n ,, H Medic Services O / • 0 `. I Maintenance Garage W • J Helipad CZ K Rapid Care f/) L MRI M Chemical Dependency ITI N Mobil Lithotripsy Pad X 0 Office/Classroom Building Addition • P Tunnel Q Ambulatory Care Building r R Northwest Parking Garage Expansion(Phase II) S ROC Expansion Z Z EXISTING & IN PROCESS PLAN << VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER D1"Lr� NORTH CD MAHLUM&NORDFORS— SO ARCHITECTURE•FACILITY PLANNING•INTERIORS rZ 2505 Third Avenue.Seattle.WA 98121•12061 441.4151 V 1 I VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER MASTER PLAN EXISTING CONDITIONS I Existing Facilities Existing and In-Process Facility Inventory Table Size IFacility (Gross Sq Ft) Total Hospital (inpatient treatment/diagnosis) Main Hospital Building 383,530 Northwest Pavilion 47,200 Rapid Care Facility 3,000 ISubtotal 433,730 • Ambulatory Care Facilities ITalbot Professional Center 95,000 Valley Professional Center North 48,400 J Radiation Oncology Center 7,200 Subtotal 150,600 1 Hospital Support Buildings ���� Hospital Storage 12,600 J Office Addition 800 Subtotal 13,400 lParking Structure* 345,700 Total Building Square Footage 943,430 1 *Under construction 1 1 Mahlum & Nordfors Architects • Page C-7 • November, 1991 Project: if e/ Ihv 1 I70:4 °✓v/Ce5 Project#: 9.3/ /, 60 Subject: pai,U ez Date/Time: 0/46/90 fi.5/1 i ll i va From: Oei4 k« hrt . , wf of DIc-e, gooR. CA, 95,0,e.? • ailve„: 966 lfJ /a9/ 6to Ake) _ 7 Zob a6014 .O�r��l �' Ztpo D ., I 2-2&. .7 la .. . . . ..... .. .... crivse � c7 ✓2•5� . ae:<.%oos c. • l Z Le ki‘.1 rrVer VMC PARKING BREAKD0virN VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER Patient/Visitor Lot A 101 Lot B 137 Lot C 101 Lot D 154 Emergency Driveway 10 Handicapped Surface&Parking Garage 60 563 Doctors OB Parking 6 Doctors Lot 39 45 Employees Lot C 3 Lot D 8 Carpool 48 Parking Garage 556 615 Total for VMC 1223 II. TALBOT PROFESSIONAL CENTER PatientsNisitors Surface 151 Garage 94 245 Employees/Doctors Garage 169 Total for TPC 414 III. VALLEY PROFESSIONAL CENTER NORTH PatientsNisitors Surface 108 Doctors/Employees Parking Garage(Included with VMC) Total for VPCN 108 IV. MEDICAL ARTS CENTER PatientsNisitors/DoctorslEmployees Surface 37 Parking Garage 282 319 Total for MAC 319 V. OTHER PARKING South Campus 186 North Property 6 192 Total for OTHER 192 GRAND TOTAL 2256 Rev 9/22/98 . 1111 410 :..m:::::isii:::::::'::i:i ?ii:>iii is iiiYi ii?iiii:is i i::::::::::i::::?:.i:::: :::i:::$`i i i; Si`;`:::::::ri::k:i:..:. '.';.' ..."..IV:::ii ii;.gi::::`iS::'':: ':2:`:;:;;%':::3::�:::::::::'"::?:":::<'22>:':> '::is::# F+ :::< ......:.::.::..............::.:::::.......................::.::........................:::::......................CITY:4........:.:...........................:.::::...................:.;::::::......::.................�..:::. ......................:.::::::... . :::::::.::..............:::.:::...:.............:::::::::::::::::.:...... F..SERVICE.:B............... .:::.:G.:...............::.:::::::.:...............:.:.:::::.::::.:::..................:::::::::: ...........:::.......... ....:.::.::::..................:::::.:.......................::AFFIDAVIT:0...... ............:..........................::._:::. On the 13.110' day of Ocber , 1998, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing ' far 9efaet avnd tSion • • documents. This information was sent to: Name • Representing • • Jo'&.e l medicik Cevitei ' StAsarn lore. midAtuv. IAvc4► ecfis • • • • • (Signature of Sender) A tea. STATE OF WASHINGTON ) • ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) ' I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that .�,. .c a j`J‹ .. signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for th‘Juses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: lJc 1 k ? ® Statashin ton Notary Public i and for the 9 Notary (Print) pp�� LYN K M H M p FF My appointment M COMMISSION EXPIRES 6/29/99 Project Name: V MG TS oihdk ttivar mouse t-Y►p&►S(Cv-, Project Number: Lam. 98 — 1.5,SY%—14N e-(, ' • NOTARY.DOC • REPORT City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works DECISION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW& ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION DECISION DATE: October 6, 1998 Project Name: Valley Medical Center IS and Warehouse Expansion Applicant: Valley Medical Center Owner: Valley Medical Center File Number LUA-98-129, SA A, ECF Project Manager: Lesley Nishihira Project Description: The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan approval and environmental review for a 10,670 square foot second story addition to an existing 12,200 square foot building on the main hospital campus. The addition will house the Information Services Department as well as provide additional warehouse space for the hospital. Project Location: 400 South 43rd Street Exist. Bldg. Area SF: 12,200 sf Proposed New Bldg. Area SF: 10,670 sf Site Area: , 9.21 acres Total Building Area SF: 22,870 sf 1.CA ,y'a1W ` H \.. t + is il ' w Guw..:al ic,D \ :k \ . rwl,„ i .. t Mom, a I 3 ® u ct�a fId4. I .,.•• .Li._- �Ib.o�b+l : + :,,7"4"/ 1 -- LI.— - .....j . Project Location Map SITERC.Doc t _ City of Renton PB/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Environmental Review Committee Staff Report VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER IS& WAREHOUSE EXPANSION LUA-98-129,SA A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF OCTOBER 6,1998 Page 2 of 7 PART ONE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan approval and environmental review for a 10,670 square foot second story addition to an existing 12,200 square foot building on the main hospital campus. The proposal also includes the addition of a mezzanine entrance on the south side of the building. The new entrance will be ADA accessible and will connect to the hospital's sidewalk system. Approximately 4,318 square feet of the addition will be occupied by the Information Services (IS) Department and the remainder of the space will provide general storage for the hospital. The addition will consolidate the IS department in one location by relocating employees from the first floor of the project site and from the main hospital. PART TWO: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW In compliance with RCW 43.21C.240, the following project environmental review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. A. Environmental Impacts The Proposal was circulated and reviewed by various City Departments and Divisions to determine whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed development. Staff reviewers have identified that the proposal is likely to have the following probable impacts: (1) Fire Prevention Impacts: The proposal will add 10,670 square feet of new construction to the City which will potentially impact the City's Fire Department. A Fire Mitigation Fee, based on $0.52 per square foot of new construction, applies to all new construction in the City. The mitigation fee for this proposal is estimated at$6,207.24. The fee is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall pay the applicable Fire Mitigation Fee at the rate of$0.52 per square foot of new construction. The Fire Mitigation Fee is estimated at $6,207.24 and is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. Policy Nexus: Environmental Ordinance (SEPA), Fire Mitigation Fee Resolution and adopting ordinance. (2) Transportation Impacts: The proposal will result in an increase in traffic trips and is therefore subject to the City's Traffic Mitigation Fee. The proposal will generate approximately 52 new average daily trips. The Traffic Mitigation Fee is calculated at$75 per each new average daily trip. The fee is estimated to be $3,905.25 (52.07 trips x$75 = $3,905.25). The fee is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. SITERC.DOC • City of Renton PB/PWDepartment Administrative Site Plan Approval&Environmental Review Committee Staff Report VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER IS& WAREHOUSE EXPANSION LUA-98-129,SA A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OFOCTOBER 6,1998 Page 3 of 7 Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall pay the applicable Traffic Mitigation Fee at a rate of$75 per each new average daily trip attributable to the project. The Traffic Mitigation Fee is estimated at$3,905.25 and is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. Policy Nexus: Environmental Ordinance (SEPA), Transportation Mitigation Fee Resolution and adopting ordinance. B. Recommendation Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommend that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINATION OF DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED. Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. XX Issue DNS-M with 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period with a Concurrent 14 day Appeal Period. C. Mitigation Measures 1. The applicant shall pay the applicable Fire Mitigation Fee at the rate of$0.52 per square foot of new construction, applies to all new construction in the City. The mitigation fee for this proposal is estimated at$6,207.24 and is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. The applicant shall pay the applicable Traffic Mitigation Fee at a rate of$75 per each new average daily trip attributable to the project. The Traffic Mitigation Fee is estimated at $3,905.25 and is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. 1. Separate plans and permits are required for sprinkler and fire alarm system installation. 2. The drainage plan and erosion/sedimentation control plans shall meet the requirements of the 1990 KCSWDM, as adopted by the City of Renton. SITERC.DOC City of Renton P/B/PWDepartment ' Administrative Site Plan Approval&EG .nmental Review Committee Staff Report VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER IS& WAREHOUSE EXPANSION LUA-98-129,SA A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF OCTOBER 6,1998 Page 4 of 7 PART THREE: ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION - REPORT& DECISION This decision on the administrative land use action is made concurrently with the environmental determination. A. Type of Land Use Action xx Site Plan Review Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Conditional Use Binding Site Plan Special Permit for Grade &Fill Administrative Code Determination B. Exhibits The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing: application, proof of posting and publication, environmental review and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No. 2: Drawing No. 1, Site Plan (Received August 20, 1998). Exhibit No. 3: Drawing No. 2, Building Floor Plan (Received August 20, 1998). Exhibit No. 4: Drawing No. 3, Building Elevations Plan (Received August 20, 1998). C. Consistency with Site Plan Criteria GENERAL CRITERIA: a. Conformance with the comprehensive plan, its elements and policies; The site is designated Center Institution (CI) on the Comprehensive Plan Map. The objective of the CI designation is to assure that adequate land and infrastructure are available for the development and expansion of facilities to serve the post secondary educational and health care needs of the area and protect adjacent uses from impacts of these more intensive uses. The proposed development is consistent with this designation. b. Conformance with existing land use regulations; The subject site is located in the Commercial Office (CO) Zone. Hospitals are a permitted use in the CO Zone with the condition that the site is located in the Center Institution Comprehensive Plan Designation. The proposed expansion is to an existing, permitted hospital located in the CI Comprehensive Plan designation. The expansion is proposed at a height of approximately 92 feet, under the 250 foot maximum height allowed in the CO Zone. The project includes a new mezzanine entrance at the south side of the building. The existing landscaping in this area will be replaced once the construction of the mezzanine is complete. The proposed expansion complies with the setback, landscape, and height development standards of the CO zone. The Parking and Loading Ordinance requires one space for every 200 square feet of area dedicated to medical offices, one space for every 1,500 square feet of warehouse or storage space, and for hospitals--one space for every 3 beds, one for each staff doctor, and one for every three employees. The VMC campus has approximately 310,800 gross square feet dedicated to medical office use, 25,400 gross square feet of warehouse and storage use, 12 staff doctors, 800 employees, and 276 beds. With the proposed addition, a total of 2,126 parking spaces are SITERC.DOC City of Renton PB/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval& ..nmental Review Committee Staff Report VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER IS& WAREHOUSE EXPANSION LUA-98-129,SA A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OFOCTOBER 6,1998 Page 5 of 7 required for the campus. Currently, the Valley Medical Center campus provides 2,256 parking spaces. There is adequate parking on site to accommodate the proposed addition. c. Mitigation of impacts to surrounding properties and uses; The site of the proposed expansion is located in the eastern portion of the Valley Medical Center Campus. The expansion site is entirely surrounded by the campus on the north, west, and south and is bounded by State Route 167 on the east. The impacts to surrounding properties will be minimal considering the property is currently fully developed. d. Mitigation of impacts of the proposed site plan to the site; The proposal is not expected to adversely impact the site. There are no significant natural features which would be impacted by the development. Construction activities related to the proposed development will be required to utilized best management practices which will reduce potential construction impacts to the site. e. Conservation of area-wide property values; The proposed development will allow an existing facility to expand in its current location. The expansion of the medical campus is anticipated to conserve property values in the vicinity. f. Safety and efficiency of vehicle and pedestrian circulation; There are no changes proposed to the existing vehicle circulation and parking layout for the site. The proposed mezzanine entrance on the south side of the building will provide ADA access and will also connect to the hospital's sidewalk system. g. Provision of adequate light and air; The proposed expansion will allow adequate light and air to the building and the site. h. Mitigation of noise, odors and other harmful or unhealthy conditions; The proposal is not expected to create any harmful or unhealthy conditions. Noise and odor impacts in the vicinity will not have a significant increase due to the proposed development. Noise, dust, and odors which may result from the temporary construction of the site will be mitigated by the applicant's construction mitigation plan. i. Availability of public services and facilities to accommodate the proposed use;and The subject site is adequately served by public services and facilities. j. Prevention of neighborhood deterioration and blight. No deterioration or blight is expected to occur as a result of the proposal. In reviewing the proposal with respect to the site Plan Approval Criteria set forth in Section 4-31- 33(D) of the Site Plan Ordinance, the following issues have been identified by City Departmental Reviewers and Divisional Reviewers: XX Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. D. Findings, Conclusions& Decision Having reviewed the written record in the matter, the City now enters the following: SITERC.DOC City of RentonPB(PWDepartment Administrative Site Plan Approval&E_._._nmentalReview Committee Staff Report VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER IS& WAREHOUSE EXPANSION LUA-98-129,SA A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF OCTOBER 6,1998 Page 6 of 7 1) Request: The Applicant has requested Environmental Review and Site Plan Approval for the Valley Medical Center IS and Warehouse Expansion. 2) Environmental Review: The applicant's file containing the application, State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) documentation, the comments from various City departments, the public notices requesting citizen comment, and other pertinent documents was entered as Exhibit No. 1. 3) Site Plan Review: The applicant's site plan application complies with the requirements for information for site plan review. The applicant's site plan and other project drawings are entered as Exhibits No. 2 thru 4. 4) Comprehensive Plan: The subject proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Center Institution. 5) Zoning: The Conditional Use as presented, complies with the zoning requirements and development standards of the Commercial Office Zoning designation. 6 Existing Land Use: The subject site is completely surrounded by the Valley Medical Center Campus on all sides. E. Conclusions 1) The subject proposal complies with the policies and codes of the City of Renton. 2) The proposal complies with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Center Institution; and the Zoning designation of Commercial Office. F. Decision The Site Plan for Valley Medical Center IS and Warehouse Expansion, File No. LUA-98-129, SA-A, ECF , is approved. EFFECTIVE DATE OF DECISION ON LAND USE ACTION: SIGNATURES: .,,-- 67-,C._ )4~ James C.Hanson,Zoning Administrator date TRANSMITTED this 19th day of October, 1998 to the applicant and owner: Valley Medical Center(owner) 400 South 3rd Street Renton,WA 98055 Mahlum Architects(applicant) do Susan Fore 2505 3rd Avenue#219 Seattle,WA 98121 SITERC.DOC City of Renton PB/PWDepartment Administrative Site Plan Approval&Environmental Review Committee Staff Report VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER IS& WAREHOUSE EXPANSION LUA-98-129,SA A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OFOCTOBER 6,1998 Page 7 of 7 TRANSMITTED October 19, 1998 to the following: Larry Meckling,Building Official C.Duffy,Fire Prevention Neil Watts,Public Works Division Lawrence J.Warren,City Attorney South County Journal Environmental Determination and Land Use Decision Appeal Process Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3),WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM November 2, 1998. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)430-6510. SITERC.DOC • - 7 II I II - - - - . . I I I IN • .: .. NAM .r sari: R .. Valley • • •rc.s. Medical I Center o • r �� I ;;iInpao_:■. \\ I 0111(IIfi)IiI ::::OI:::o: — \\I ,9� r- _ II! . IS and W 9En.,..e ' +'. // ansiI • 9 TREE-CUTTING 1. I\\ / .�.�.� I.NO TREES ARE TO BE REMOVED 006022 THS PROJECT. •\1 A// M A H L TJ ML , '�/ .•btrrrr. ieor --- I/' w NOww>• /'\Lnw; LANDSCAPING 1 I W /.EY51flG LANDSCAPING TO REIOD!UNLESS - N [rmrc roar run 1 �.$.= NOTM OTNERWIS. aA� wn • T' I ST S `n.• 2.AT YEZUJUNE ENTRY.CONIRNOTOR SNHL REMOVE am nn �j10 0 n•1 - �`` I • • I EY516JC LANDSCAPING AS REOURED FOR NEW 2E77ANNE n..yo o x�u,oa o VVV 1 y ENTRY.NO PUMWG WILL BE REQUIRED UNDER A il•F I ` N : NEZZANNL CONTRACTOR SHALL REPLACE EASING OR anal n,. SI 1..9 20'-00 . 00r011 O•-fl PROVIDE NEW TO MATCH AT AREAS NOT wDER YE27ANRh, rn.4AR w•j @ `% i .. I t;�I • " i1l GENERAL NOTES 1V.r jE;1 I.E10511NC U00RES SHOWN w SITE PUN El 11 a LEO OE GQkRA0000 URmED flR1 1111111111 rII Tam IIIIIC::II:P 1 E b `1I • nou\IC„I. .L_ 'rkW"i� __ 7 \'�: IIII a m ' / >+ Jr rs 61.0��) BUILDING DESCRIPTION are 1 awwio��. 1 W ,IIIIII` W _- MUG MST FLOOR 12200 3 �dNWWr.L ,.J-I-_.ram I —..e. ..7.. w;wu ..—2/23 I I — NEW SECOND R0011 f0.670 Si 7erlio. 1 ' .. .. 8A9T CWrm S RA MM. t �„1,, 1 n r� .1. TC9Y 6r�N4� , q,JOINS WART(15) . �/�1 n (1) I CONSIRUCTgN 119E 5M 61 • •v� GIS1NE55/S10RAGE OCCUPANCY B/51 -\ " .40 ►. BONIWOD(1) -.• [14AOECN(6) W LEGER/ .=:= 005TOMC STOOL SEWER LINE EEE O 0W n O LANDSCAPE PLAN e SITE PLAN SITE FLAN SOW:1•=10'-0 SCALE:f=20'-0' NORTH NORTH 6I MI O 5 10 20 0 10 20 40 1 2b S �I �I ,I I I I I I I NOR U ®9D •• ••• Valley - Medical I I EMERGENCY Center EAI BI 'C\ `D,I 'E. r\ `�I GENERATOR EYE pp•_0' Sr `MIME BETWEEN DAMGROS `I Ii1E1 I I I IL and Wa�i ou.�i — - 7 - T 7 7 - 7 - _ --=:io IuRPansic ORME CDICEI REC MRG a°d ® ®i ® IO'tl - 3 M A H L v Al OrECC . • � 6. e . ..-" . " F I®[ � ' b 1 pJ\ I vAREHOUSE B TRSE DOOR anIa -h . Mtn 1.3 o 1 rIA I y_-1._ �_} - __- I Irk_—_ �_—_ —_-_ -_-_1-_-_ _—_ �., I I UWFR I SISTERS A BURSTER& 1 I 1 j j �1 CNI f SWE R00Y PRIMER COYRUICR _<` MI I_ �I 1-EEE9 1 ® ® I 1 1 it 1 C:i r 7 - s1 _ -- - -1 , - - - - - 1 - - awe-tee d .0p-H 7 1NketBW 9716150 O ore: Amisawt20,1998 ///,-, . na.¢ sae owls. m 9671aoAppea1,SEPA 7aYese • — — I Z FIR5 T FLOOR PLAN ��NORTH D 22 8 18 I 1 /AROUND Ill g PROVND�1, ^ II MIX —_— _a __ _—_—_�_ -•—rJJ—® FIRST FLOOR g-, DAIRY . AND MEZZANINE 1 MD PLANS -1 — I1 STR GCEM/RY i — 0 ' C R AA OENL 1 O MEZZANINE ENTRY PLAN 2 SCAM 11 -1'-' NORTH / - 1 • f41 c) /Kp i i i i i i ,. ! Valley Medical COWS s12641011 Imo►gee.` Center i �Jl ♦li Ad \I \1 \Ii N.i ..i LIi ! tIM11UUL ETSIBI Den 04 I I I 1 I I ! ES and Waref•—•— I 1 I I I I I • i �ansic i ! i i ! ! i 0 LncE I • . • . � i./ 1 IIILi� .', MA LUM//? � I MI lc :�'.,�Y,i ir----T____-1 ![iiIiJ LLJ 9----T----1 F� it I 1 u A ! ! Ii _ u ! ! iielliV , EB+ WI° II 1_ L, __ Ir----I----� I --- ----I -- M'----+-----1 1 ST- ------p "� •--- _ - -�-�--�-i�--1--1-��-�- -----�--- ---- I f�9 1 •,��:.• ,erg _-y___ _ !L.___ ii___ L___ ___• I __-- � 1 FE3 ` I--Is .t3 I' ! I i ! i „7,8 1 ale now �— — — ! i i i ! _ 4 4 h EI CC Mjl� LOWY ! Ii i i Ii I 1 + i i gi i i I I SONS All SIMS 110 �1,00 a � _ Tp�pp� l ,GOWIfdC,1T91d' ��• "! ./ r P A . .u.l !. ! ® 1 ! i !erc l --- --4,11 OH — 1 — 1 i----- -------i----- -----I ----- — ----- k-- ! i i ! q ! i I • i ! ! ! ! CO ! i i ! i i ! ! i i IIE®c i I i I I i --- -. __ _- - [ i i �. I i 1 I .i a. I i ! ! i i i i i Doke n°m°N� snms0 ! ! i i i ! ! i i i om ®a o� 99° 9bPloApp.&WA• , 32.111000 SECOND FLOOR PLAN ®NORTH .111 SCALD 1/d•=1•-0' O 2 d 8 18 • • 3 SECOND FLOOR PLAN 8 . 1 i 4I L _ _J F • F 07742 E7ES WALL FR16R,ST FR10 KEMAL CREAu COLOR - - - - - - - rN q)- /oA - - - -r\ -- /i1 �!_0015' r� i jl /1 .. \ ... .7., \ 07620 uETH corns.sr Awdptl ROSPIW CREAU COLOR './ \/ ♦/ AR wHLne RA AND•uc[aww I i I ! ! ! STANOARO Np�ITA1 CR�u COLOR i ! ! I 07670 RASE NSNMCOQR i1RUCNRAL CONNEC00N, i ! I TIP/WNL ! I i 1 i i scvmRIO wswru MEAL!1LOR I I I Valley $91.-r ; I ! 1 I t Medical Center FDOVIIG ACILITIESh i I i �g 1CFQ A,10P/EW9PO FlURI` -- - - - - - - --,- - r J - -�- .�: ( IS»d W mil-....m 71•-O I/( e i 1 I ; I!Y�I is f1• uKEn-A/Ima CNRFI i..II IIIi IIIIILIGIII I 1,I I,�l I I 1 11.11111/11111111111111i1111.1N111111:1 1 `I 11.l;I I I I I I I I 111111111111.11111111 I - iqI ! 1N ' 1 `M A H 1 U M N ��COICJSIF ' � 1 1 072/2 TYPICAL V CROOJE I I I — icow.:. FItST n00R — SW0N0 HOSPITAL-Carj cttw f ! i i smaLRE i i i I ! 1 ! +- i 1i 1 gUD4l i I II I 05521 OWRORAL RI BROI MONO COME 70 Mal. - SIE SITE PIM FOR SPOT EUMI7ONS TRIM EAST ELEVATION Imirmimeini w, SCALY:1/0'=1•-0- 0 2< 8 16 ..a.,. • ...wo 0 m 0 -:mow:/ / • FK> Ci) (M) i F►1 al /off i�) /11 ® i i i I i i ! i i i ! i i i i } i 1 i i ! ! ! i i ! 1 ! I 1 ! ! i i • I i i i i i 1 07IA7 EFs Ftld91 I i i i I i 1 07610 unAL CONIC.STAN01F0 iCREAM COLOR T ! 1 i i i ! CREAM COLOR g7te>m i ! i i i i i /',I 0661 µuuANM wawv mre W 0llF DAA Amman TSWW T /+� I _ i I I 1 I I / 1 caw I eauu1EO GLAZING y,� �, �, 91-� I! I STAMMAp CREAM COLOR G. ]Fulie_ I (4/i PM: -0�',�l�/o I11TWG PAIIII 7 . I I E _ [ . —� OUI,li i I 4,..... .-.-.1., ',-,, 01 /fAIL PARA➢ET r KLi u III I - 1 I I - I 'I ' I ^ 1 1 E V TT s 1— � '-1 ^ '-1 -- ^, �- —! E ! i 1 1�UU LIUl 1 lULl i I i ! ! ! . . I i i IIIIIIIIIPIIIIII IIII ! ! 1 - ! V i-mot •— -•vF••- 1 ! i - 1!! ! i IN ! ! I !F806-6noon 11 i I ! I II I ! AI 1 —�i 1 I— _ �f1. i 1 ! !I 1i I i i j CANOPY 1124080,170 ORQE EAS'r/WEST ! ! I E10STW0 CENERAIOR BUIONO EweTec FREdn au PAILS 1 DOSING SLIPPER ma ! i I EYSIINO Dinky AW7 mows! ELEVATIONS i I i i SWORD HOtm cRUY COLOR i DOWNSPOUT TO REIM— I i i tun U1[PUE 1 STAROARD CREAu COLOR . 00SCN0 REV" TO RCY LR 07670 SCUPPER 00 � i 0Ox6rom TO wLOCTOW SAFC U10 CRAH NAH TO RET5TYPICAL 1 S— COLOR E26QE SIR PUN FOR SPOT EUMLOLS•MICR. WEST ELEVATION �`J SCAIE:1/A'=1'0' 0 2 1 8 76 L 5 •• 1, 1, AN A q10 n R A 0 DUCT EOM, J Valley • STANDARD CREAM OYOR TW/WNL I Medical 91'-7 077A7 TYPICAL V-GFROVE I I SCORCIFES Center 07717 EPS MASKMASKSTAIOARD HOSPITAL CEMRATOR mum mom5 -I I. I • �-CIdAN COLOR I • 05170/05370 011(1 CANOPY,ONOG BRONZE F1/9NG,SWORAO HOSPITAL ��((,, OBAfO AU90AA1 MID OASS EOM J,SECOND ROOK ;1 CZAR 03LOR ` I �: c E ENTRY MYR ANO SIOEIIGRT. x M 4 ES an W arils.'' 7G-6,L TW/OASLNC PURL` � L. �^„b cYM BRONZE 7A•-9,/t • U _ ` I I , I li I IL 0---' .I�___ . 1 TEni wursuOIS box )'pa4C810 y ®®�®r IL ' IIII�ii��7L�`III!IIII,III uEanxRE35,Trrr d IA A EE I. a AA I • I�� rR0�ar p 1111 ;`. ;-`. CI ,C I�; I, • PI" ' 05521 GWRDRNL,DARK PORE • sr s / I iI I■ ..„... �`',_`=' EM WITH J I I I I RE u a/A,Yi10 40w+�uWauiE. lielliW: SEE • EXISTING O0S,0NN BRONZE Mom,PRECAST WALL PANELS, . STANOWO HOSPITAL CR044 COLOR EOSMO MST FLOOR DORY, _4444 In, DARK DIME [ZING GRADE TO REINOL - aim in SEE sac PLAN FOR SPOT N.r.o o Natal,.0 ELEVATIONS mu. aaua ar SOUTH ELEVATION imlmll ' " .14•,I ;,1 f SCAM l/6'-1'-O 0 2 4 8 16 • CY . In• II •`y,• `•, I 9716IS0 1 1 07670 14W COPNG STNNRO NOSPI1AL CREAM COLOR A! Aep[7g1998 9W/N�1 I I 0nS7242lEFS V-0 DEN.. 8Ap Oe�a I �ft 07LI707670[PSL[TH TNM51@0,9E NAVOAROSTANDN 0 IOIIO7IT4L CREAK Sf1W.OPNI[NOR Pad*. - COLOR,OVER STRUCTURAL CONNECTOR ilmi N0 B ii DE=CONCRETE WALL PANELS, Iq S[C90 FLOOR ; lei I I '� $ DOSING GENERATOR BpONO STANDARD COLOR oyo . ROSETTAL T w-cr 1 10P/E65TNC ma` , I I •I I• I h S q 7e-O 1/r OARx 0019E I ' I I' I II I -r _ E! a ; = __ I I / 'I Ia + m i . . _. _ , K I I wnF 0IN OOON I \ I AHD FRAME CA67wrIIC I I D1RC WARM TO RCN NORTE/SOUTH TYPICAL ELEVATIONS 05571 1 1/r OD.STANDARD STEEL PPE G MROA.LARK more[ (00111C ODOR ARO SINS. F WN N[6 R SLOPED TO M SRR0 Ek61NC GRADE TO RERAN, OW E SWANK TO REIAW SEE STIE PIAN rw SPOT 1 ELMiWb.MCA. • 1 ©NORTH 1'-0'ELEVATION �J SCaZ:1/If= 0 2 4 8 -16 6 ................................ .. • • ............ aiiiiiigeg.ENIMEBMSMMMMMNM ```C>:> AF IDAVI. : :.<.F .... ..5 On the 8 dday of. Oc*o r , 1998, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing deo w►incehtit14 • documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing Department of Ecology • • • Don Hurter WSDOT • KC Wastewater Treatment Division • Larry Fisher Washington Department of Fisheries David'F. Dietzman Department of Natural Resources Shirley Lukhang Seattle Public Utilities Duwamish Indian Tribe Rod Malcom Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Joe Jainga 'Puget Sound Energy• (Signature of Sender) altrav - • screire • STATE OF WASHINGTON ) • ) SS • COUNTY OF KING ) . I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that , t,1 {. decs' 1 sighed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and'voluntary act foPthe uses and purposes. • mentioned in the instrument. 1' Dated: lb Il •Notary Publi 'n and for the State of ington • • Notary(Print)MARILYN KAMCHEFF • My appointm:t►:.r- lastON EXPIREs Project Name: yVAL IS QN.d ukufeltouSe 0-Mt°til Project Number: WA •98- '2q ' SO • NOTARY.DOC • CITN )F RENTON mIL Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator October 08, 1998 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia,WA 98504-7703 Subject: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on October 06, 1998:. DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER IS AND WAREHOUSE EXPANSION. LUA-98-129,SA-A,ECF The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan approval and environmental review for a 10,670 square foot second story addition to an existing 12,200 square foot building on the main hospital campus. The addition will house the Information Services Department as well as provide additional warehouse space for the hospital. Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3),WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM October 26, 1998. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way;:Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. If you have questions, please call me at(425)430-7270. For the Environmental Review Committee, (//4/t) /11-225M) Lesley Nishihira Project Manager cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division Larry Fisher, Department of Fisheries David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources Don Hurter, Department of Transportation • Shirley Lukhang, Seattle Public Utilities Duwamish Tribal Office Rod Malcom, Fisheries, M,uckleshoot Indian Tribe (Ordinance) Joe Jainga, Puget Sound Energy • nGNcYLTx ooc\ 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington.98055 :.� This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer 0 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Lori L. Furnish first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of the � NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL 1 DETERMINATION :• ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE 600 S. Washington Avenue, Kent, Washington 98032 RENTON,WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non- a daily newspaper published seven (7)times a week. Said newspaper is a legal ' Significance-Mitigated for the following' newspaper of general publication and is now and has been for more than six months project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. prior to the date of publication, referred to, printed and published in the English language VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER •IS AND 1 continually as a daily newspaper in Kent, King County, Washington. The South County ; WAREHOUSE Journal has been approved as a legal newspaper order of the Superior Court of the . LU dmini2 native ,site • PP 9by P Administrative plan approval and State of Washington for King County. 6-environmental review for addition to the The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the South County L main hospital campus. Location: 400 So'. 43rd St. Journal (and not in supplemental form)which was regularly distributed to the subscribers Appeals of either the environmental during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a determination (RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680) and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or.before 5:00 Valley Medical Center IS &Warehouse PM October 26„1998. If no appeals are • filed by this date,both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing as published on: 10/12/98 together with the required$75.00 applica- tion fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of I The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $43.88 Renton,98055. A5 Souths Grady Way, Renton, •i 9 9 9 ' WA Appeals to the Examiner are Legal Number 5267 r"----N governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B,Additional informa- tion'regarding the appeal process may be • obtained -from--the—Renton_.City Clerk's /./� ��..4 i Office,(425)430-6510. C y , Publication Date: October 12,1998 • . Legal rk, South ounty Journal FPublished_in-the South County Journal ,� ' October 12, 1998.5267- ---- Subscribed and sworn before me on this (( ay of Ott- , 19 . _ _________________...] O���`Q9 V P P P I PI!/rf/ (CCAO:j.igt•-'," Y)-N _ �`:: '.0< ,.,�; Notary Public of the State of Washington -uiT el ` :.0 m residing in Renton King County, Washington � e r/' - .,1®7 Nee �,iiiirereiiePs►.A.t•I eea NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE • RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER IS AND WAREHOUSE LUA-98-129,SA-A,ECF Administrative site plan approval and environmental review for addition to the main hospital campus. Location: 400 So. 43rd St. Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3),WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM October 26, 1998. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. Publication Date: October 12, 1998 Account No. 51067 ".�. CITY JF_`RENTON " 4 Planning/Building/Public Works Department Greggimmerman Administrator Jesse Tanner,Mayor G gg P.E., October 08, 1998 Ms. Susan Fore Mahlum Architects . 2505 Third Avenue#219 Seattle, WA 98121 SUBJECT: Valley Medical Center IS and Warehouse Expansion Project No. LUA-98-129,SA-A,ECF Dear Ms.Fore: This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) and is to,advise you that they have completed their review of the subject project. The. ERC, on (DATE),.issued a threshold Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated with Mitigation Measures. 'Seethe enclosed Mitigation Measures document. Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3),WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM October 26, 1998. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)430-6510: The preceding information will assist you in planning for implementation of your project and enable you to exercise your appeal rights more fully, if you choose to do so. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at(425)430-7270. For the Environmental Review Committee, 2/6 fif?"5-2..) Lesley Nish' Ira Project Manager cc: Valley Medical Center/Owners Enclosure • -1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055. - -iciA CITY OF.RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-98-129,SA-A,ECF APPLICANT: Valley Medical Center - PROJECT NAME: Valley Medical Center IS and Warehouse Expansion DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan approval and environmental review for a 10,670 square foot second story addition to an existing 12,200 square foot building on the main hospital campus. The addition will house the Information Services Department as well as provide additional warehouse space for the hospital. • LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 400 South 43rd Street • Advisory Notes to Applicant The following notes are supplemental information provided in`conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, - they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. 1. Separate plans and permits are required for sprinkler and fire alarm system installation. 2. The drainage plan and erosion/sedimentation control plans shall meet the requirements of the 1990 KCSWDM, as adopted by the City of.Renton.` • • J .: CITY OF. RENTON . DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES • APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-98-129,SA-A,ECF APPLICANT: Valley Medical Center PROJECT NAME: Valley Medical Center IS and Warehouse Expansion DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan approval and environmental review for a 10,670 square foot second story addition to an existing 12,200 square foot building on the main hospital campus. The addition will house the Information Services Department as well as provide additional warehouse space for the hospital. . LOCATION OF PROPOSAL 400 South 43rd Street?::;, MITIGATION MEASURES: • 1. The applicant shall pay the applicable.Fire Mitigation Fee at the rate of$0.52 per square foot of new construction, applies to all new construction in the,City. The mitigation fee for this proposal is estimated at$6,207.24 and is payable prior to the:issuance of building permits. 2. The applicant shall pay the applicable Traffic Mitigation Fee at a rate of$75 per each .new average daily trip attributable to the project. The Traffic Mitigation Fee is estimated at $3,905.25 and is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-98-129,SA-A,ECF APPLICANT: Valley Medical Center PROJECT NAME: Valley Medical Center IS and Warehouse Expansion DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan approval and environmental review for a 10,670 square foot second story addition to an existing 12,200 square foot building on the main hospital campus. The addition will house the Information Services Department as well as provide additional warehouse space for the hospital. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 400 South 43rd Street LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3),WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM October 26, 1998. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510 PUBLICATION DATE: October 12, 1998 DATE OF DECISION: October 06, 1998 SIGNATURES: � � Elfl;9► DATE/6 l� Gr g Zim -r an n(strat r epartme t I) P ing/Building/Public Works — 0,i,ee /0 10 Y'' ' Ji Shepherd, ministrator DATE mmunity Services / -e, Pc % ref DATE Rent n Fire Department DNSMSIG.DOC L CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-98-129,SA-A,ECF APPLICANT: Valley Medical Center PROJECT NAME: Valley Medical Center IS and Warehouse Expansion DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan approval and environmental review for a 10,670 square foot second story addition to an existing 12,200 square foot building on the main hospital campus. The addition will house the Information Services Department as well as provide additional warehouse space for the hospital. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 400 South 43rd Street MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. The applicant shall pay the applicable Fire Mitigation Fee at the rate of$0.52 per square foot of new construction, applies to all new construction in the City. The mitigation fee for this proposal is estimated at$6,207.24 and is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. The applicant shall pay the applicable Traffic Mitigation Fee at a rate of$75 per each new average daily trip attributable to the project. The Traffic Mitigation Fee is estimated at $3,905.25 and is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): • LUA-98-129,SA-A,ECF APPLICANT: Valley Medical Center PROJECT NAME: Valley Medical Center IS and Warehouse Expansion DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan approval and environmental review for a 10,670 square foot second story addition to an existing 12,200 square foot building on the main hospital campus. The addition will house the Information Services Department as well as provide additional warehouse space for the hospital. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 400 South 43rd Street • Advisory Notes to Applicant The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. 1: Separate plans and permits are required for sprinkler and fire alarm system installation. 2. The drainage plan and erosion/sedimentation control plans,shall meet the requirements of the 1990 KCSWDM, as adopted by the City of Renton. • , . - ,.___. . , • , • .. No-n . ,,.. . . • __---.ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION • . POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER IS AND WAREHOUSE EXPANSION PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-99-129,SA-A,ECF The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan approval and environmental review fora 10,670 square foot second story addition to an existing 12,200 square foot building on the main hospital campus..The addition will house the Information Services Department as well as provide additional warehouse space for the hospital. • _ Location:400 South 43rd Street. ' THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE NED THAT THE ENVIRONMENT. AVObgVP.a Appeals of either the environmental determination[RCW 43.21.007�q),WAC 197-11-680]and/or the ' land use t decision must bew l flied in awriting on p must be fled in writing together wi8.th thoe required 875 00 by this dote bowactionswi become final.,Gib, Appeals , application Appeals t the with: Hearingrore edr City of Renton Mu South Grady Way,Renton.WA 98055. info mat to the Examiner are governed sbys City of b from CodenSectionCtyior'1 O.Additional4 ) information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Cleric's Office,(425)434 6510. -..Lnu f - .P.\ W lack5)(� {gQ'InnI1II1 fll-a —4 .....,n ,. , . •. . FOR FURTHER INFORMATION,PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON,DEVELOPMENT ' SERVICES DIVISION AT(425)430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION PIease:Incitide'the project NUMBER when calling forproper file'Identification..`' " CERTIFICATION • I, Al f t5Y1 �(o' , hereby certify that copies of the above document v�/ereposted byme in conspicuous places on or nearby. P the described property on 14)J Q, o 1(o< )'90 • Signed: ¼'t'u-.ATTEST: Subcribed and sworn before me, a Nortary Public,in and f' e State of Washington residing in-+."-AA-0- , on the a k / day of(e 2 / 9 W k:42--7-1A-4-AA--e---fe . MARILYN KAMCH EFF COMMISSION EXPIRES 6/29/99 . • ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER IS AND WAREHOUSE EXPANSION PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-98-129,SA-A,ECF • The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan approval and environmental review for a 10,670 square foot second story addition to an existing 12,200 square foot building on the main hospital campus. The addition will house the Information Services Department as well as provide additional warehouse space for the hospital. Location: 400 South 43rd Street. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of either the environmental determination[RCW 43.21.0075(3),WAC 197-11-680]and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM October 26, 1998. If no appeals are filed by this date both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required$75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton WA 98055. . Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)430.- 6510. lilti c^�' KYWeh .l.,i ' t i . \ ........., \ ''' 1: gilti ' 'CJ(IIn'ryLr 1 a r wool, .�l. YY4PI C^ r"1 `"N \ ! co?tot I % ...Air Lbw. .r14,„.,ia 1 .......--- \ t------ it4t,m-,_ • !, L �; �"''. ..... . �``k- ..- � FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT(425)430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION e :< UMBER>:when callin :for.::: .ro ,er fi.le:id.. ntifica ion;>::<;:;`;:>><;>;;>:::: ;:<<<:<:.:�::.,::::<:;:PL.eese:,r►clu�d+a:::the:pro�:.:Ct.N:..::. :::.. ......:.. :.: :.::...,;;.::1::.:<:,...P...p.:::.....: ....:.:::.:...:.: :.::....::.. . .._ . . . City t. _nton Department of Planning/Building/Pu'. _Yorks ENVIRONMENTAL It DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Otnowuc. e wt OMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 29, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-129,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: SEPTEMBER 16, 1998 APPLICANT: Valley Medical Center(VMC) PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER TOTH HENNING PROJECT TITLE: VMC IS and Warehouse Expansion WORK ORDER NO: 78428 LOCATION: 400 South 43rd Street SITE AREA 9.21 acres BUILDING AREA(gross): 12,200 sq.ft. BUILDING AREA(new expansion gross): 10,670 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Valley Medical Center proposes to add a 10,670 s.f. second story office/warehouse to an existing one-story office warehouse building. Project requires environmental review and administrative site plan approval. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Llght/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ HistorleCultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet • 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS N S S u t S • C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have revie h' ication with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where a 'oval info ne to properly assess this proposal. /1492qhE/98 Signature of D' or or Autho' Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 - City a nton Department of Planning/Building/Pu. _:,Yorks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:Cimsi -{lam e..4t COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 29, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-129,SA A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: SEPTEMBER 16, 1998 APPLICANT: Valley Medical Center(VMC) PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER TOTH HENNING PROJECT TITLE: VMC IS and Warehouse Expansion WORK ORDER NO: 78428 LOCATION: 400 South 43rd Street SITE AREA: 9.21 acres BUILDING AREA(gross): 12,200 sq.ft. BUILDING AREA(new expansion gross): 10,670 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Valley Medical Center proposes to add a 10,670 s.f. second story office/warehouse to an existing one-story office warehouse building. Project requires environmental review and administrative site plan approval. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water ht/Glaro Plants Recreation LandrShoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF RENTON SEP 18 1998 RECEIVED B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS Vv We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal ` 47 2 4f/ Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 1 , v City_, anton Department of Planning/Building/Pi_,_, Works ENVIRONMENTAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:-r Sr-6 COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 29, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-129,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: SEPTEMBER 16, 1998 APPLICANT: Valley Medical Center(VMC) PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER TOTH tENNIN' PROJECT TITLE: VMC IS and Warehouse Expansion WORK ORDER NO: 78428 `er � � <` ) LOCATION: 400 South 43rd Street . < � <0 . SITE AREA 9.21 acres BUILDING AREA(gross): 12,200 sq.ft. Ab(4<.3J' BUILDING AREA(new expansion gross): 10,676 .ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Valley Medical Center proposes to add a 10,670 s.f. second story office/warehouCkto an existing one-story office warehouse building. Project requires environmental review and administrative site plan approval. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major information Impacts impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS S,;2 C.��ac� e!! �-e 2 CG(I C.Gt IA /Utz (i� �i --� 04•r 1/c av(^i i f-.,.€ //,� i 3R05 . Z5 -b C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS /Vv 6_0W1 WI f/G(./1 . We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. A)&/ C-()aZ Rz Vq Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 • rV O • rAw.JH w/ -NM ::Y j.•«-•ice. , f 4�fY} v� .rT*41- T A SP. QRTY. . TLCIN ITIG �*'.y'. :. •Wnv:iiY^l�'' :^.istrhwv..K.rw,ww,^,..:a.wcw+::-,...nri..esxr�-v :.s.+sa.:ilw.wee .,gtrrw.cLwxit.+..✓.„ovsM ..wew..w.a�wwe•'� Project Name ' M C I 5at4461 &Oa ve liDuce XP cois • love Project Address 1100 S . y 3 `�� 5 T Contact Person • Address Phone Number • Permit Number • Project Description 1/MC ,oYo pc)ses to cecdd & /0) 670 c.f, cecoLd slov office AA)0 ve t?OuSe. �o . c,vt f.X/51)1 -s-to vy wave 1'1 yse J 1 Land Use Type: • Method_of Calculation: Wavtl,o1 ( 1.50) ❑ Residential J ITE Trip Generation Manual ❑ Retail 0 Traffic Study jir Non-retail 0 Other (Z.ufe: 4.81 1 00O4- Calculation. Ott p 417 tv)fs ( q .SS) ( 10.67) = 52 . 07 dia., trip At $ 5 ., .R4 dai y tvip . .. ( 175) ( 52 . 07 ) _ 3c1a5 , 25 • •--- . Transportation Mitigation Fee: 13ct0S. Z5 Calculated by: • ��r�l �/ /- Date: R ZN �!g Account Number: 105.. 5RR. 3150, 70. 00. Date of Payment • City o nton Department of Planning/Building/Pui � . Vorks ENVIRONMENTAL & EVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: t:b ' COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 29, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-1 ,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: SEPTEMBER 16, 1998 APPLICANT: Valley Medical nter(VMC) PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER TOTH HENNING PROJECT TITLE: VMC IS and Warehouse Expansion WORK ORDER NO: 78428 LOCATION: 400 South 43rd Street SITE AREA 9.21 acres BUILDING AREA(gross): 12,200 sq.ft. BUILDING AREA(new expansion gross): 10,670 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Valley Medical Center proposes to add a 10,670 s.f. second story office/warehouse to an existing one-story office warehouse building. Project requires environmental review and administrative site plan approval. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Hlstoric/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet 5. cS Z2o e. a-ee_) GZfi l �' 722472 L L ee . B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS • C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to property assess this proposal. err 1, " %.P Q'gp4 Signature of Director of Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 I City i . onton Department of Planning/Building/Pi,'-� Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:S` 1 ro� o�etJr COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 29, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-129,SA-A,ECF`" DATE CIRCULATED: SEPTEMBER 16, 1998 APPLICANT: Valley Medical Center(VMC) PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER TOTH INNING PROJECT TITLE: VMC IS and Warehouse Expansion WORK ORDER NO: 78428 ,,,Opp LOCATION: 400 South 43rd Street r'StA OAJ SITE AREA 9.21 acres BUILDING AREA(gross): 12,20t g '' ? I BUILDING AREA(new expansion gross�`Ir,0,670 sq SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Valley Medical Center proposes to add a 10,670 s.f. second story office/w2f se to an existing one-story office warehouse building. Project requires environmental review and administrative site' approval. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ HIstorIc/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF RENTON SEP 18 1998 RECEIVED B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS ,1 1 A 0 1/14 i wA 'to I to D e✓Ili 01,17 WV-4v� 1144 p Cv�/t7Li/j cvLect Sett.2p/( -to c�-011--tica ✓( (va- '` , D co ►(O G c L' I O? Gt�,-r t(I !, 7 V Pit 7►v/fi�� U v` Yeti/i I✓ea . C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS IVO public 1/0-(4 0-) 1ev mil) VeQti✓fU , We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is need d to properly assess this proposal. o 0 a a) I 1 AL / Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date 9 Rev.ev.10/93 City a Inton Department of Planning/Building/Pu. _ Norks ENVIRONMENTAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: r Remp<j La COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 29, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-129,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: SEPTEMBER 16, 1998 APPLICANT: Valley Medical Center(VMC) PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER TOTH HENNING PROJECT TITLE: VMC IS and Warehouse Expansion WORK ORDER NO: 78428 LOCATION: 400 South 43rd Street SITE AREA 9.21 acres BUILDING AREA(gross): 12,200 sq.ft. BUILDING AREA(new expansion gross): 10,670 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Valley Medical Center proposes to add a 10,670 s.f. second story office/warehouse to an existing one-story office warehouse building. Project requires environmental review and administrative site plan approval. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information. Environment Minor Major Information impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing . Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet • DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF RENTON SEP 18 1999 • RECEIVED B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS N.)C c.avu Wiektt. We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where add' fo/►ImfatiNon is needed to properly assess this proposal. / 1 ql Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 s s, er City 4 - nton Department of Planning/Building/Pu 'Yorks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ' weptreavuhrn COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 29, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-129,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: SEPTEMBER 16, 199:IRE 1.1 APPLICANT: Valley Medical Center(VMC) PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIF_E TO• H NING PROJECT TITLE: VMC IS and Warehouse Expansion _ WORK ORDER NO: 78428 FIR P � U R1=vFrtirinni PUEEAU LOCATION: 400 South 43rd Street SEP 1 8 1998 SITE AREA 9.21 acres BUILDING AREA(gross): 12,200 sq.ft. BUILDING AREA(new expansion I 6 Q st SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Valley Medical Center proposes to add a 10,670 s.f. second story office/warrreho `t an existing one-story office warehouse building. Project requires environmental review and administrative site plan approval. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet /J , /00 1 1i vy JS J19r B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS 10 A C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS ajigir 0;61,0404 ei47 5 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additio al information is needed to edy assess this proposal. V/Y'V 0'4d.1t•7 j Signs ure erector or Authorized Represents' e Date DEVAP Rev.10/93 Y S.T O ® CITY OF RENTON ��N2o� FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU MEMORANDUM DATE: September 18, 1998 TO: Jennifer toth Henning , Planner FROM: Jim Gray, Assistant Fire Marshal I- c SUBJECT: Valley Medical Center Warehouse e pansion, 400 S 43rd St. Fire Department Comments: 1. A fire mitigation fee of$6,207.24 is required based on $.52 a square foot of the new building square footage. 2. Separate plans and permits are required for sprinkler and fire alarm systems installation. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. City e._ rnton Department of Planning/Building/Pt_ "Yorks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: I:beks COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 29, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-129,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: SEPTEMBER 16, 1998 APPLICANT: Valley Medical Center(VMC) PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER TOTH HENNING PROJECT TITLE: VMC IS and Warehouse Expansion WORK ORDER NO: 78428 LOCATION: 400 South 43rd Street • SITE AREA: 9.21 acres BUILDING AREA(gross): 12,200 sq.ft. BUILDING AREA[new expansion gross): 10,670 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Valley Medical Center proposes to add a 10,670 s.f. second story office/warehouse to an existing one-story office warehouse building. Project requires environmental review and administrative site plan approval. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary. Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet C 7 f !� ?� e /9/4_ B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS Clil.` _ /GC.?/ • C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS C' We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. " 1• P )8Wa t/( e Signature of Director or Authorized Representa 7 Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 .............................. PROJECT NAME: Vcdi 'Wuc -Q CCe4eA NAlt. kapkcca. fp APPLICATION NO: LUA • GM. IV( Ec p SV4- Y°! • The following is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. •The Development Services Division will notify these individuals of the proposed development. NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER Ui*VLA' 11113 OPR B,r 1i n R, SE - Lo bwt.oti k \SSaP.� , ts� 45021 �(o�CaB(� -o��c� t6t a •1,„ gi u otiar )(, l��C A R M YpVV11 'I� ��� . „tvr G }je,, �5�� l�If2Pr1iL1��DG + - 1 p[&SO -(mil'. GCS A4.. a, 'Ted � 1V� 1 l co TO-co l S tCoWD 4 c04c Q -"ri, . (x)A% l8GS5 , c03c SVIAM121A ,Sitvat (4 4S`�4e) . 43 _ ~7Cvlc��a (2C7 1D U4(' MeA-Dai StAr3 itt4r 1Z ivirk at,gos-s- aity, Wieti Ilo,oa "� I2305 - ISci 1 q AssOV. Z2.2. L C, 13G1D SE -5 23 S (�Z BeitleivaL , (PA asp vAN imehtas /66‘.00, (113D Ta69± RA, S �123 i 5 —Oil y (Attach additional sheets,='if"necessary)'' 35,6. . • (Continued) NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL . NUMBER- PrAOLIC , Dc h 4-1 4co--5 . 4 VA,il V� � 5 3123(is - o l c-i 5 G/a G wu HGEtr 1 A— PIro Ira-, to $Co1 Li 12 3u5- ilol2 - Applicant Certification _ I, S 0- , hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property (Print Name) ...a...4:0A'0, %tt. owners and their addresses were obtained from: `�. RC.F li, 0 City of Renton Technical Services Records : 47.•` ,, ''�, ' -% 14 - 0. Title Company Records S s S '. King County Assessors Records r. 's • t V-4 rM,P o rr 7 Signed Y-79tS2_ Date 4ffit I' l' . P ,�I� ,,ss' = (Applicant) Ili%7 o.Iv � — • NOTARY ���� ATTESTED: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary.Public, in and for the State of Washi ton, residing at ✓rE' o •h�yTrk day of Aru 50 s --- , 19 9r Signed (Notary Public) .. .EREMINiiiiiiiniiiinginlialigiiiiiniiiiingiiittet#6.ktirii...iidit1.6.II Rgt-i f::3F iE::::::: :'::::::::::::':::':::::::::::: iii::'# ::: :: :o:::::: :: :::'::::::::::::::::::: >."AILING:; >` :>': >::'>`:>` ` `>` ::»€`<'>':'I>€€< >' j <`` > ::::::«:i::>::i�:::>::i::::i:::::ii::i:< ::>::::>::>;::>:i;::>»::>�:>::::»::::::>::::::i>::i::::>::::i::::i:»:::�ERT(Ff.....AT[ .N..:OE..Nt . ........................................................ lic on.. .e.e. a e 1:::;:..., :: •: �.>::: ;:.;;.:.: .... .. �.;��<::. er. b.;i. . :: r:.;>: tia'€€notices::n..:.t...e. ...... ......e...... . ......at................................:...::t4:::li:::. a e6 i.: :;.:5:::::::::::': ::::::'::'::<:`:::::'::: :: ::ii.;ii ii :.i:i giiiii i_:ii:ii:ii. is isi`:i::yyii:r':': ::::: :: : ```i!i`:ii:';i.i:`;:i::iligii:: ':';i . f;.: .. < >[<ii ?t >[<«`` i:::<:i:i:i:ii i'i isi ig" '" r i » >i e .�:>lis ed<:: .r . .e .:.;:::owner:::::on:::::;::; ..::::�::.'` .::::::::::::,...:�:.�:::.�:::..::::..............:. .::::: :::::::: ::. :::. :. : :::: : :: :: giiiipatiatitaiiii24". 051MiliglialliliniiiIi$i$figamgmaimssiesmiiirsimignmoonsinam : tiRl ::'':'>< :» <' » >>>: ` > >>` >> <>»> > >> > ' >' > > >< ` ............. ATTEST.:.;:•:S #:#:0: imills.woreim fore::: a:<:a:::N.ota.::. Pub)ic> m::::and<for::.:::the:0OV:fileg::: . t..:::::::::il :<:; :::<•siowirgiiii:>::»>.:::.......... ... .......................... listV07/95 .• REV 07/ MARILYN KAMCHEFF COMMISSION EXPIRES 6/29/99 2, , ' Proposed Mitigation Measures: ' �1rcY o i The following Mitigation Measures: ___r be imposed on the proposed project.These recommended Mitigation Measures address project Impacts not covered by existing codes and regulations as cited above. . A A 1. Fire Mitigation.Fee: equivalent to 80.62 per square foot of new construction. The applicant .jVrv0 would need to pay this fee prior to the Issuance of the building permit. NOTICE OF APPLICATION 2. Transportation Mitigation Fee:equivalent to 876.00 per each new average daily trip generated by the proposal per the Institute of Transportation Engineers(ITE)manual. If this fee is applicable, AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON- if would be required te be paid prior to the issuance of a building permit. SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED(DNS-M) Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Jennifer Toth Henning, Project Manager, Development Services Division,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 90055,by 6:00 PM on September 29,1998. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to he made a party of record and receive additional notification by mall, September 16,1998 I contact Ms.Henning at(425)430.7288. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of DATE: record and will be notified of any decision on this project. LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-98-129,SA-A,ECF I I CONTACT PERSON: JENNIFER TOTH HENNING (425)430-7286 APPLICATION NAME: VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER(VMC)IS AND WAREHOUSE EXPANSION PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Valley Medical Center proposes to add a 10,670 s.f. second story officeAvarehouse to an existing one-story office warehouse building. Project requires environmental review and administrative site plan approval. - • PROJECT LOCATION: 400 South 43rd Street i OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED(DNS-MI:As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project, Therefore,as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS(M)process to give I notice that a DNS-M is likely to be Issued.Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period.There will be no comment period following the Issuance of the Threshold Determination of NonSIgnifrcanca Mitigated(DNS-M).A 14 day appeal period will follow the Issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: August20,1998 I -.— ,�1-j.s1 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: September 16,1998 j.% (r.,1 c`_t Permits/Review Requested: Environmental Review(SEPA),Administrative Site Plan Review.Project also e ;� requires a building permit,that will he applied for later. " .w um- y1rMy �� qrI Other Permits which may be required: Not applicable. 1 r f� '� •(1 i aa��`l.- , Requested Studies: Geotechnicat Engineering Report _..••'' 'i\ �1 u 111III , Lair Location where application may \ \ Hi I d be reviewed: PlanninglBuildinglPublic Works Division,Development Services Department, v� t�� I 1jr I q 6th Floor,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 `-\ I' ? . ..-.. PUBLIC HEARING: Not applicable.The proposal is subject to administrative review. `" y ,, .P I" CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: r�M Analytical process 'I rL tr-i •■ Land Use: The project site is part of the Valley Medical Center campus.It is designated 7 a �6�.....;„›"T. 1`r Cenler-Institution on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map.The site Is , • zoned Commercial Office(CO).The proposal is consistent with the policies ofp (m. thq Comprehensive Plan and development standards of the CO Zone. -•i ,0 t(i „ . Environmental Documents that `-"�'/ C� YO lr\-.-�'\ Evaluate the Proposed Project: Geolechnical Engineering Report \t Development Regulations . Used For Project Mitigation: The proposal Is subject to the Citys SEPA'Ordinance,Zoning Code,Public Works Standard's,Uniform Building Code,Uniform Fire Code,Site Plan Review Standards,etc.These adopted codes and standards will function to mitigate ' project Impacts. . • oEm.NLOT.00C -_ GEIad+LOT.00c --- -- - --- CERTIFICATION • • I, .SarAt) rAin niki , hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document were posted by me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on 9424-• 18 111e • Signed: 9 °dYV'' ' v,vww'l ATTEST: Subcribed and sworn before me, a Nortary Public,in and for the State of Washington residing m 0,1)'0-71 ,on the S'c day of . l cj 9.e . '.: 21a}-(-A--1-.c. '' 'ice-----)2-0-Aif' . MARILYN KAMCHEFF• COMMISSION EXPIRES 6/29/99 © CITY OF RENTON -~ :—..-- Planning/Building/Public Works - 4 � � r 1055 South Grady Way - Renton Washington 98055 y SEP 18'9�8 8 p 5' thi Ca ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED 4 9'71 9 S F .1/ T EA. 14s ri►E I t \1°)i.t' .1 , s•-...1""`" ':' C' r ',' i • . C::: Ilk RENTON VALLEY r✓ 79 ASSOCIATES SEA' 2 `r.� 1 8 17900 TALBOT RD S RENTON, WA 98055 C1_Y CJi _ --.'� k�%i'v 312305-9134 Engine Jt. Hg i URN 866/. TO WRITER _1 daS 22 1ADDRESSEEIP UNKNO l�l j ay llVrl 0 11�1�,1tiT�It�F„ i#,111111,i,,,1,i„�{1a�l,ll,�„1,1,b„l,ll II A VINITO NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON- • SIGNIFICANCE - MITIGATED (DNS-M) • DATE: September 16,1998 . LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-98-129,SA-A,ECF APPLICATION NAME: VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER(VMC)IS AND WAREHOUSE EXPANSION PROJECT DESCRIPTION:, Valley Medical Center proposes to add a 10,670 s.f. second story office/warehouse to an existing one-story office warehouse building. Project requires environmental review and administrative site plan approval. PROJECT LOCATION: 400 South 43rd Street OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED(DNS-M): As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore,as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS(M)process to give notice that a DNS-M is likely;to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated(DNS-M). A 14 day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. 1 PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: August 20,1998 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: September 16,1998 Permits/Review Requested: Environmental Review(SEPA),Administrative Sitd Plan Review. Project also requires a building permit,that will be applied for later. Other Permits which may be,required: Not applicable. • • Requested Studies: Geotechnical Engineering Report Location where application may • N , be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, 6th Floor,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 PUBLIC HEARING: Not applicable. The proposal Is subject to administrative review. CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: • Analytical process Land Use: The project site is part of the Valley Medical Center campus. It is designated Center-Institution on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. The site is zoned Commercial Office.(CO). The proposal is consistent with the policies of the Comprehensive Plan and development standards of the CO Zone. Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Geotechnical Engineering Report Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: The proposal Is subject to the City's SEPA Ordinance,Zoning Code,Public Works Standard's,Uniform Building Code,Uniform Fire Code,Site Plan Review Standards,etc. These adopted codes and standards will function to mitigate project Impacts. . Proposed Mitigation Measures: The following Mitigation Measures will likely be Imposed on the proposed project. These recommended Mitigation Measures address project impacts not covered by existing codes and regulations as cited above. 1. Fire Mitigation Fee: equivalent to $0.52 per square foot of new construction. The applicant would.need to pay this fee prior to the issuance of the building permit. 2. Transportation Mitigation Fee: equivalent to$75.00 per each new average daily trip generated by the proposal per the Institute of Transportation Engineers(ITE)manual. If this fee is applicable, if would be required to be paid prior to the issuance of a building permit. Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Jennifer Toth Henning, Project Manager, Development Services Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton,WA 98055, by 5:00 PM on September 29,1998. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact Ms. Henning at (425) 430-7286. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: JENNIFER TOTH HENNING (425)430-7286 IPLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION I • • t.R D eCoa ' ��.\ q1 • ` , YdW \ �` ,\ , M µu.q \ ...,... 1.. , °Ail fill' I ,--10.6t-it,) \ „ \ . : ant - 110 ce.)„,.,\,. .! -,,rgi t.2 vt., Ill'ti . ,... ,'4 .,,d ____...),..., 4. ............. ):1 \ ,z,'9 li . .....Ai:-- .ts• 1 � . ,.... \ jT ' i „cdr. \ .010.70-. 1 ,.. . J . JP it\ • -• \ • • • GENMALOT.DOC ••fir; , CITE'_ _ DF RENTON i t�.tL Ll Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator September.16, 1998 Ms. Susan Fore Mahlum Architects 2505 Third Avenue#219 Seattle, WA 98121 SUBJECT: Valley Medical Center IS and Warehouse Expansion Project No. LUA-98-129,SA-A,ECF Dear Ms. Fore: • - The Development'Planning Section of the :City. of Renton has determined that the • subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on October 6, 1998. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. . Please contact me, at(425) 430-7286, if you have any questions. • Sincerely,• - 4nA__ I 1. ,0 M-11) [1 AP/.. 1A/V) Jennifer Toth Henning Project Manager cc. Valley Medical Center/Owners AcchTLTR.Doc 200 Mill Avenue South- Renton, Washington 98055 ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer • iiiaEo<';�niii?iOS::%:OR ':i:iiv; tti? 'c ii ii35Sii:ti`ii,i IT �+ .. i�•l-:�i:� ��.1�.��`���s�.iiiii��::'`�i:.i��:''::::'::::::::i':�:� ''i;'.•;`;::i:::<•`.`g>isJ�''i>:�' �<i:: '�?:t::'I'::?'�'%~'���i:<' ::si>::::�'�::`.ii'��i::;?:''':'::'�:?:j: : ::::ii:ii?::::<:::>:::i:rii3:�3 i�::i:::is.r:>:i:::'tii%i::isii%r:::::;::#::::::?::2`::is:i:':;i::2:::i::::::i::::ii •)E..:::` :;:;r'::Pm:E•::?::.::•::is�::•:x.::?•:a:<.;:.::::.;:•S.:;:.:•;: IIO;.:•:;::.. :,c:::::::;,jy.::..:..:::::. <.;:'i::] .,i. }:: ili:..x`.....,y.;!..,..i{,.fi.. ... .. : :>:<:»>i: <<<:iiii::isii>i:»:iiii::i>>i::i:»<:>:ii>::<iii:isi::i>:>i>:::::i>:iii�iii>:i>:i::>:>::::ii<:::i>iiiiiii<: p � �.ap�nr±ruT.sERvrcEso�v>.scoN:....... :: .............................. > >> > > > ......,i<,iiiii......::ii,i::>::i::::,:;: : ,....i:;::.... ii i :i ::: >::: << :i,; ;::: ;i>: ...... : ::: :: > > ..... < > is>: > <> < .......................:.:........ .-.......-.............. - -...........................MASTER-APPLICATION.......-----..............................-- .......:..............:.......................................... . . ilibillinammiiipooPEEtritwOIN.N :Note>'.iIf<thereis;itiora than o`ne,Iaga):owner' (ease:attach an additio'nal.: ..r otarized :..aster Riiicat5::%:x;.%•' •.::: ac.,.,: • • n a d.M ter�A::• li ion.f. r e h.dwne':'i:::s"::?:':i?::is�::>:':si�::»>::>:'•:<iii:::is:>:::::�>:::<�::>i:iii>::;::::: i PP .. ... r...............:.::... • . . .::.....�. . PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: NAME: . Uall Meddcd Ceuir1 \lath M. Medic A km . Is (Awl Itibw,cfvwu- E 64 PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION: ADDRESS: 400 n 4 8 eA" S' KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): CITY: R i1 "I ✓J ZIP: q•3056 j - l — g851(o7 -oao . TELEPHONE NUMBER: ,425-22g_Z(-1 4o EXISTING LAND USE(S): L I is€::AM110.. NT:;i'(#::.o:her:dbAll:>if wn.er::i<:>::i:>i:i:>:::i:>::>:>i:;i:i:> l( I PROPOSED LAND USES: (�,,,.,, (� ,�,,,,,.�- NAME: A'CCeSSor� — �mPUtA £tp 4 • . -6)r 1/105piil COMPANY(if applicable): EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE•PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: ADDRESS: PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): CITY: ZIP: EXISTING ZONING: Co TELEPHONE NUMBER: PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): ' • P NI E NY 17Nhl Ita!�> C P OL� �'�:"'``:"`':` :'` ":�'.......... .. .tUT,A. T....Eta . .ICI........................................:. L. SITE AREA (SQ. FT. OR ACREAGE): qNAME: "lif OE(,��. r� G,21 acres f:70 r,. RECEIVED COMPANY,,(if applicable): . . PROJECT VALUE: ahlccwt r 'e . . . .3 ► k;cn . . ADDRESS:. 2505 irA ci ictz1i IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? tiO CITY: Q u,(1,k. ZIP. 61.6(n I IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY V l�l l I L SENSITIVE AREA? TELEPHONE NUMBER: 20u-141(_`lt5 l My ............................................... ................... .......................................................................... VIS I-ID Of -itt 0A.ilevi Med'cl CLd1 biv AA Ptam. Ve corete4 twin auptiivr v o. R31121-1 D , Volta(e s I-13, re cvrds o{- . Veltk ou�-'j , lJ�a 6stik6-r . ..:.:.:.:.. ..................:. ...... . . ... .. . >:� h`e�.:..:...::::•II<`:;.::.;:<.:.:li t(o.n..: s::: h ;� 1. ....0 ... t ff..w I .. rm)n. .>. : :s' >>}:{>>:' < � <>>:: :�:::<::> :<::«>;:>:::::::>_::>:::::::»>:<:::>:<:;::::::;::>.....0... .ck..�...... . .. . ........ . ....t...at.. . ...... .. .......a...............M...+d..t...............e...fee. ............................................... • _ANNEXATION • $ SUBDIVISION: • . _ COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT $ _ REZONE $_ _LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ _ SPECIAL PERMIT $ _SHORT PLAT $ _TEMPORARY PERMIT . $ _TENTATIVE PLAT $ • • CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ _ PRELIMINARY PLAT $ 0,SITE PLAN APPROVAL $/CO(),GEC _ FINAL PLAT $ GRADE & FILL PERMIT $ (NO. CU. YDS: • 1 • PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ _ VARIANCE • ; $ (FROM SECTION: ) PRELIMINARY _WAIVER $ FINAL _WETLAND PERMIT • • $ ROUTINE VEGETATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ MANAGEMENT PERMIT • $ • _ BINDING SITE PLAN $ SHORELINE REVIEWS: _ SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ _ CONDITIONAL USE • $ _ VARIANCE $ EXEMPTION $No-Charae X ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ ,50C) REVISION $ :..........:....::::::::.............::>::::::::::....:::::: ....:: :: :::::: I, (Print Name) GA-WA Px¢... ,declare that I am(please check one)_the owner of the property involved in this application,Lithe authorized representative to act for the property owner(please attach proof of authorization),and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. e' , CnI^ ATTEST: Subscn a and sworn to before•r lar in and l/ VI —vre for the tits oflxm �✓ residing a • Yv �1. (Name of Owner/Representative) bT fib / thef) �tioN ,a,�i�i� if t s \AOTAR y.k. 4 Akt_ 4)1/U2. (Si' ature of Owner/Representative) (9 fi PUBLIC- (Signs re of Notary Public) $.->55.#4 3 .19-99 a",\O rr :i::is�;i:+<:::2:;�il:�::�;::;�':.::�:;:;>::::�:5::::;>::•::;:;>:;::S:;i:..'•i:::2�::;sS;::::;`i::::::•;:;:•;is�>:�;>::;::;;5:::::i;:;:;::�i;:;':� :�>:'t:�::;:::;;r:;;:;>:�::;::...::::::::::�::�:; ;:::�::::;�':::�'�:?iky::�i:�::�:SS:�:::'•5::2:::�i:;::�:;::x`:�.`•:�:�:�i:�.'�:t2;:'..... ............:....:........Y:.::..�......v....b.�..::%...,.:. ::::::..................... :....:....................... goyNCl .P€ ..PP. . .......FP.)!'.f'.R.....RVMM. A..J4....0A.l)-I... SH.PL.A S I. .... ....... ...... ....... ................... ... ...... .........W..... P .N;....SP.....SM:....S.[1R>w .TP �U�1.;�:.:.;.:�..;.,�,N MASTERAP.DDC::::..:•:REVISED:B..97::::•............................................................................................................................................................................................................... .... M A H L U , ` a r Ic h i t e c t s p 40 �`QA August 20,1998 'o 'x®vFNj,, City ofiRenton �� ?94 tiC Development Services Division ®�j• �� - 1055 S.Grady Way Renton,Washington 98055 Project: Information Systems and Warehouse Expansion(97161.00) Valley Medical Center I Y . Subject: Site Plan Approval w Project Narrative E The project consists of a new second story addition to an existing one-story office/warehouse building on the Valley Medical Center Main Campus.Site is on Lot 1 of 9.21 acres.The Main Hospital is also located on this lot.The project site covers 3% of the lot(12,200 SF first floor/9.21 " acres). u Access to the project site is through the main hospital campus only,following the main loop road.Access to the hospital is off South 43rd Street on the south and Talbot Road South on the o east.Rou hte 167 runs along the west side of the hospital campus with an exit at Sout 41st o Street/south on East Valley Road to South 43rd Street. The current building houses the main computer network for the hospital,the Purchasing department,medical records storage,x-ray film storage,and the hospital's substation/generator. The second story addition will provide 10,670 SF of space.The Information Services(IS) o Department will occupy 4318 SF of the addition,with the remainder of the space providing o general storage for the hospital,not to exceed 70 PSF.Currently employees of the IS department Z are on the first floor of the project site and in the main hospital.This addition will consolidate the Z IS department in one location on campus near the hospital's central Computer Room which is located on the first floor of the existing building. Building height above finished grade varies as the site slopes down from the high side on the east to the low side on the west.The west elevation is 39'-0" above finish grade and the east elevation is 26'-0"above finish grade.See Exterior Elevations submitted with this package. E Z I = There are no wetlands,water bodies or steep slopes on the site. ° I The project does not provide new parking stalls since the employees occupying the new _ expansion are currently located on the same lot. i 2505 The three-story main hospital sits 40'-0" to the east side of the project site,a two-story Facilities Third ave. Building lies 10'-0" to the south of the project site and the two-story Northwest Pavilion is 40'-0" SUITE 219 to the north.On the west side of the project site is surface hospital parking. - Seattle,WA 98121 206 I 441.4151 206 J 441.0478 • e p The second story expansion will have virtually no impact on the current site. A mezzanine entry will extend over a landscaped area to provide for a new ADA accessible entry on the south side of the building,tying into the hospital's sidewalk system.A second exit door provides access off the north side of the building at a current sidewalk. Susan Fore Project Architect SMF/sal 97161.00 proj-nar.doc • 40(*South 43rd Street Renton,WA 98055 / - 425.228.3450 FAX 425.575.2593 N' N Valley Medical Center August 19, 1998 City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 So.1Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Project: Information Services and Warehouse Expansion Valley Medical Center Subject: Site Plan Approval Parking Lot Coverage and Landscape Analysis Gentlemen: Valley Medical Center requests a waiver for the parking lot coverage and landscape analysis requirement from the Site Plan Approval package. The project provides new office space to consolidate the Information Services Department in the same building as the main hospital computer system. Employees of the Information Services Department are currently located on the first floor of the project site and on the first and second floors of the main hospital. The two buildings are next door to each other and share the same parking lots. In accordance with city requirements, eighteen spaces are required for this project. The hospital will not hire new employees to fill these stalls. The assigned employee parking spaces will remain unchanged. Employees without assigned spaces will park in the same lots after completion of the project. The hospital acknowledges that for the next main campus expansion project, it will provide a parking lot coverage and landscape analysis as required. If you have any questions, please give me a call. in erely, omulo M. Almeda, P.E., FASHE dministrator, Support Services M A H L U a r 'c h i t e c t s p August,,20,1998 City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 S.Grady Way Renton,'Washington 98055 Project:' Information Systems and Warehouse Expansion(97161.00) Valley Medical Center Subject: Site Plan Approval Drainage Report E For the above named project,I am requesting a waiver of the Drainage Report as part of the Site Plan Approval Package.This construction project is a second story addition directly on top of a one story building,with the area of exposed roof remaining the same. The new roof will have four roof drains with overflow drains right next to the main drains.The vertical rainwater piping from the new roof drain will tie into the existing exterior downspout through existing opening in the concrete parapet.This downspout already ties into the hospital's storm sewer system.The overflow drain will run parallel to the new/existing with the downspout draining at grade.The existing roof uses an overflow scupper. I Y The project does not contain or abut a floodplain,stream,lake,wetland or dosed depression,or a sensitive area as define the Sensitive Areas Ordinance and Rules,King County Code 21.54. • )&41.4irce_. 0S� 0 Susan Fore PVt\ ` Project Architect `0P41J �i�, OF SMF/sal �� ® \%* > J 97161.00 diainage.doc �`� _ 0 2505 Third ave. SUITE 219 Seattle,WA 98121 206 441.4151 206 f 441.0478 M A H L U L a r 'c b i t e c t s August 20,1998 City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 S.Grady Way Renton,l Washington 98055 Project: Information Systems and Warehouse Expansion(97161.00) Valley Medical Center Subject:I Site Plan Approval Construction Mitigation Description The proposed construction requirements for the Valley Medical Information Services and Warehouse Expansion are as follows: Beginning/Ending construction dates November,1998 to February,1999 Hours of Operation 7am to 7pm Monday through Friday One Weekend to relocate Mechanical Units • Z o Hauling'/transportation route Project site is located on main hospital campus via main o loop road.Contractor to be directed to access hospital from Route 167,entering the hospital campus off South 43rd Street and turning south to the project site to avoid traveling in front of Main Hospital Building. Construction staging area to be west of project site on surface parking lot.Contractor will also ° have use of interior of building for field offices and equipment storage. o Construction project minimizes impact to surrounding site.Structural footings are all within the Z existing building footprint under roof.This will also dampen sound from slab cuts and drilling into the concrete floor. No special construction requiring specialty hours for hauling. Preliminary Traffic Control Plan Contractor to be directed to use Route 167 over neighborhood streets o iLuyikt."fiAs..„ Susan Fore DEVELOPMENT PLIo\N,,IlidEG 2505 Project Architect CITY OF RENT Third ave. AUG2 ® ���" SUITE 219 SMF/sal AU Seattle,WA 97161.00 constr.doc RECEIVED 98121 206 441.4151 206 441.0478 400 South 43rd Street Renton,WA 98055 425.228.3450 �j FAX 425.575.2593 • Valley Medical Center August 19, 1998 City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 So. Grady Way Rento , WA 98055 Subject: Information Systems and Warehouse Expansion Valley Medical Center Gentlemen: Valley Medical Center declares Mahlum Architects to be the authorized representative to act for the property owner on the above project. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sin rely, R o . e , P.E., FASHE NR11N,G A ministrator, Support Services op of REKTON c► RMA:tw AUG 2 p 19* RECEIVE," • • ........ ......................................................::::..:.:.. .. . .... % :;:E%.•.'ENTON:`:• ';` ::'? :3::?i':'' : :`•:.:: : :`•5:.` :'t? ::':•`::`:'•:' ::rr;:':2 .......... ::.....:...............:........:.::.:... :::::::...:.... • • • PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21CRCW, requires all.governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact. Statement (EIS) must. be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify Impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. , .• INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known,or give the best description you can. You must!answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write"do not know"or"does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can . assist you. • • The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or On different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your • proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. • USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete, this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does•not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). •For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and rogran)pth'e''refences in • •the checklist to the words "project," "applicant".and "property or Wtgi. I6q; a-dCas "proposal," "proposer;," and "affected geographic area," respectively. lag .AUG2 • - . N • • Environmental Checklist A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Vall9 N1 ed Ut'al Ceatm— (S ALd lil9a t4towle- 6/4yuksiov, 2. Name of applicant:. • VaVit �lectc'oRI 0461 — J "OR 'C,oJI [Ula AfAtitt( 4 ) 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 2505 `(U1 i v2( 7VP,u,v e. 12t' 20(e-Y-1(-q tS t Safe . litVoiitibt0n, R (2w) 44t-04-15 4. Date checklist prepared: PuttA4 (a,I6115 5. Agency requesting checklist: U41of 1 tw&toph t 8wvices Diosist&A 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. IUv 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. 4,uke , nick Rtport 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. flu 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. ValVoi VOW &tot Va".,' ' a-. 2'° -sty(?) -{D a pile-s o u. /tMktE4vue- I22-oO 61,1a -fit 2Ia Roar 4M eA. is 10,00 sF• The, Vtav 2 lcov wilt Mist- cu p 4ot Atit aMd pi/mute. -for 4meitz( tipi .( gI (vItd. ` 0 psF)• Hain *spit( ( th(Jj is 4(502 u✓l lot I . • •t f •• Environmental Checklist 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for 'a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by.the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed�pl_a_ns submitted with any permit applications related to this • checklist. l,/y decotirt10n o ( agf - Apptfeztton. S 4 UG20140 oat Play► inattAd4.01 subwu tt PIAA4 A l • B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other SIop.es . b.. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) g% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. awe. vvytut. sett Gtlov3 xekst- side. 6+ bwo -- Ioosc YneeUELVil die fill of daMlwn d•rtitse ( Witia (moue-d•eposi'13 an -Km. wain-HA Gaut (Pest- sides d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe.. 0 e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. 'IIv sike. -11 o,r oar wJ i A pubje(' f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. IJo g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 'oje " Is new "0ard stern oA pine-StM14tJtad(del. Egin He2.2a.mtkt. adds 230 St Of rtitse.d tkutIL vet q.2t atvc. — 07, h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: t4, 3 Environmental Checklist 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any,generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. ►rnlv►iw*( owl- d-tut,o(i-fion (,all 1,tv . tittaior of e><is}ilaJ builc(iu ) Gmsivocfiovi �y,� L . b. Are there any off-site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: 3. WATER a., Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate,state what stream or river it flows into. • 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. ' 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. IAA 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year flood plain? If so, note location on the site plan. • 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials.to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and'anticipated volume of discharge. N Ac • • • Environmental Checklist b. Ground Water: 1)1 Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. ! No 2)' Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or'other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. MOIL— Neat" Alt/Wits - live) e tstt storm. sewers , vilt'fs will 'f is l Q iw5 C WU1 c.' Water Runoff(including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any(include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters; If so,describe. $u i ISIht Vbo( ori s fi cVuiv e .isliwi 47(144_ Stwwt (to 400 Sr of' Iro 'aua) C .opr5 Ili U. I4'we- oyUe I dowKapo ft -fn eulsfi'i46 cdat loasria ( sF (51- a.w) 2)1 Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. 0 d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and: runoff water impacts, if any: 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site.: X deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other )( evergreen tree:fir, cedar, pine, other 5( shrubs Y. grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants:water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? 1Sitts (CO //tAki+e t c I) icw 1.Lef) SI'•3t t0 Want (l5) UiYtc-I t .) c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. tiA d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: NIA 5 • Environmental Checklist 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: t4A Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other • Mammals:deer, bear, elk, beaver,other • Fish: bass,salmon,trout, herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: • 14 6. ENERGY AND,NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Air }}tad(( I�.wc}- oil be e(tc,�vj'- ate( I�il( supply duZZt A coo(tu/J ak.e( {wit-� P-i ceS • space williutg. ,ewyrc (A.o'at r bintoas • b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: _ 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so,describe. • 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: ik • '4 Environmental Checklist b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Qatt- . 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. cShur+-tam Would tat rotnsfurvafisK tkrAsc:. ' k - f e & 4t-ife s CAt 1e- brb 0-'j1Ce/ I"'^yc. Use . 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a.; What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. c., Describe any structures on the site. W- Pitti4titt pspl ,( (ftal &ske) kace-molt titult SvaA as dcx'tv'S o4ire.), Me4ki - ( act•pA.-fiact a Inks, puuw eLi , patietio **a .44lil►es latain d. Will any structures be demolished? If so,what? • Ib • e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Co ' " f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Comte 6SiiitriDA • g. If applicable,what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 27 Environmental Checklist • j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? Qtyne, k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: 101 I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. • c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: 10. AESTHETICS . ,. . a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building materials) proposed. cf le✓I Top c5F.wall of itItIbtst poi alcove owe, . of (q l'- jU L ,u . set (voet) act-Noe of bualeiti, hots EIFS f 1Vlistn (Eitesiitio builoteivi rs Confute Pfaie(s) . b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? t of tiospiiul (vot'wn (thz+) LAANiciA. is sivir ,Cvr a ane pad' t mom c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: 1.�1/hL 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? 4�iu►Z b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? 8 • Environmental Checklist • c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? ohL • d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: 1lIO\Q 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? • b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so,describe. iON2 c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. , Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so,generally describe. • b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. i • c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: tAA 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. VAtl oatc, is bob • 414. VUc4 b5 iv4c (ill (Ino Akrat access); at {fit Soo-uk koj Scow itasi Sires+ (Mad east 106 la,lbof" poad Boo . Set f yr luspi'A( et1 . b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? c. ' How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? �o SpaceS eliwv►itcel• 14A 1 butivA {AAA (AgAkipciata i i fr ( pritA.Viin spies . • Environmental Checklist • d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not Including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private? • 110 e. Will• the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. �Ug f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If. known, indicate when peak volumes�� L would occur. kID aaiii0 lriP6. MiiCe She Ye1 0.-4- s/ o+tsoliAAtes .exits wj am.ploti.L.es• g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: 011e- 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. tut, b. 'Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currently a' ailable at the site: : i, na MIR s, , (A> service,t(tpli e,sa qr er,septic system, of er. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service', and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. 1I COnSitxliovt would '(le tiu"o -11aStitA1 bltnoc.iin Se,rJIces (e(Rciriai stonak otAAA Sat'it,0v-1 s'a , plitory. ) C. SIGNATURE. :I, the undersigned, state that to the best•of my knowledge the:above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non- significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: Name Printed: aISGtUI 'f Date: Nuys+ . -(qq.2) • 411 • Environmental Checklist D. 'SUPPLEMENTAL SHEETS FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS ese3.ee s:>1t.0.14ii::::o i 1'::�be:::::.ri et3::::ft�•<;:::act ans<:::: .v Ivin :40.. isions1 ::_:: o e <ii>('I'h.:::::::::::::�.:::::�.::::::.�:::::.�.�.:::::.:�..�.:>::::::.:::.:..s..::::::::::.::.r..:::::::.:.�:::.�::.�::�.n...::o.:::::::. :.�::::::c:::.�:::::::::::.::n::. :...li.�..�::: .I�rts<::�C.rd piQgiam .t.....o. .. .o.not.need..ta..fiXi.ai t ktese. heets.fo iiii. t.eot.acatig.) .. ....... • Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the . Het of the elements of the environment. • When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production,. storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? • Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: • 2: How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals,fish, or marine life are: 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: • 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, flood plains, or prime farmlands? • • Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: • 11 Environmental Checklist 6. 'How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and • utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: • 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non- significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: Name Printed: Date: ENVCHLST.DOC REVISED 6/98 • 12 . qg —61 0. ' :'. .\ MEMORANDUM (s, ^'' DATE: 7 Z( / 5' 0 TO: Construction Services, Fire Prevention, Plan Review, Project Planner FROM: Jim Hanson, Development Services Division Director G.;z,,,/ C- m SUBJECT: New Preliminary Application: Mc jc-OrriS ? rpar ian LOCATION: 1'' ..31• 1-7r37`{ 6�teei- A eetinig with the applicant has been scheduled for (0:00 PM,, Thursday, for one of the 6th floor conference rooms (new city hal . If phis meeting is scheduled at 10:00 AM, the MEETING MUST BE CO CLUI ED PRIOR TO 11:00 AM to allow time to prepare for the 11 :00 meeting. Please review the attached project plans prior to the scheduled meeting with the . applicant You will not need to do a thorough "permit level" review at this time. Note only major issues that must be resolved prior to formal land use and/or building permit application submittal. If you are unable to attend the meeting, please send a representative. i Please submit your written comments to fe at least two (2) days before the meeting. Thank you. DE ELOP;.Z;ENT PL'- 1.-II G CITY OF RENTON AUG 201998 RECEIVED #0 ay-i-,........„.4.....v.z- C_ . 6 emA3w.thivtAt 7/ 3 • O(cY C� . ' ® . CITY OF RENTON FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU INTO MEMORANDUM DATE: July 22, 1998 TO: Peter Rosen, Planner FROM: Jim Gray, Assistant Fire Marshal SUBJECT: Valley Medical Center Warehouse expansion, 400 S 43rd St. Fire Department Comments: 1. A fire mitigation fee of$6,207.24 is required based on $.52 a square ppit �jrure foot olf the new building square footage. punm.4 P'` v 2. Separate plans and permits are required for sprinkler and fire alarm systems installation. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. :1 u"f 2111.d hay Hc), witg 3f.e, dadum b e.c lC (�2b '(;JL��O�t�- ` �k �, �� k ekntrkele6( ce,,:ti. s C� upgilL aj 1 , 1/4-0/0-0 , ham' ,i1-}iinsDrt I,UI 11 dA ' ire Gamier ' �'iA'"'` kid/4 Cs ' Kok Lfe °N o MEMORANDUM �``'�4, ��" -, ' '� 4fr DATE: 7 2 .( lsi TO: Construction Services, Fire Prevention, Plan Review, Project Planner FROM: Jim Hanson, Development Services Division Director '.,,, / fhb I UGC en614.9t✓ SUBJECT: New Preliminary Application: (//t'lc Jcis ?°,);i3O-cart LOCATION: 17S'- 17131-`{ 67!, t A meeting with the applicant has been scheduled for S2.%) Pfri,, Thursday, (per- for one of the 6th floor conference rooms (new city hal . If this meeting is scheduled at 10:00 AM, the MEETING MUST BE 4 CO CLU�DED PRIOR TO 11:00 AM to allow time to prepare for the 11 :00 meeting. Please review the attached project plans prior to the scheduled meeting with the . applicant. You will not need to do a thorough "permit level" review at this time. Note only major issues that must be resolved prior to formal land use and/or building permit application submittal. If you are unable to attend the meeting, please send a representative. ` Please submit your written comments to pel-67' at least two (2) days before the meeting. Thank you. N)o ! puloI;c, Lvo✓I:s rssu.PiJ t e'°e° 41• V() act r 5caY/ir. Avalvtecza al 57M4 I viig with ✓curved. A)c pu,$ -c. cvc7tA6 ' -f— CS DC 1 01 tvaJU 41111iRtCM i4--e5) yece:ted 740 C4550Cleite4 0 -61,.,Le 1441144). M 1 v j 41V G y S/0 N s • i Aid W � 1/ZLI/qg CITY OF RENTON PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: August 6, 1998 TO: Pre-Application File No. 98-62 and 98-52 FROM: Jennifer Toth Henning SUBJECT: Valley Medical Center Information Systems and Warehouse Expansion--400 South 43rd Street General. We have completed a preliminary review of the pre-application materials for the above- referenced development proposal. The following comments on development and permitting issues are based on the pre-application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision makers(e.g.,Hearing Examiner,Zoning Administrator,Board of Adjustment, Board of Public Works,and City Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by City staff or made by the applicant. The applicant is encouraged to review all applicable sections of the Renton Municipal Code. As we understand your proposal,you intend to add a 10,670 s.f. second floor addition to an existing building on the Valley Medical Center campus. The space will be used for Information Services (IS) Departmer it(4,318 s.f.)and the remainder would be used as storage for the hospital. The applicant is proposing no new parking facilities to serve the use, as existing employees would be redistributed on the campus and the parking need would not increase. Co Zoning. The site is zoned Public( 1). All uses within the P-1 Zone require Site Plan Review. WJA :04 iSh4UCt� Environmental Review. The proposal is subject to environmental review(SEPA)based on the size of the addition. Typical mitigation measures include payment of a Fire Mitigation Fee for the new construction. Site Plan Review. The proposal is subject to administrative site plan review,based on the size of the proposal. Site Plan Review looks at issues such as the horizontal and vertical arrangement of buildings on the site,landscaping,parking and circulation,pedestrian circulation, signage and lighting. Parking and Loading. If additional parking is not proposed to meet the City's standards for the addition,tlien the applicant will need to apply to the Administrator of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department for either a deviation or modification. A parking analysis should be provided to \\TS_SERVER\SYs2\COMMON\H:\DIVISION.S\DEVELOP.SER\DEV&PLAN.INGVTH\PRE-APPS\VMCX.DOC August 6, 1998 Page 2 demonstrate existing use and future need. If approved,the Administrator would likely place a restriction mandating the addition of future parking if additional employees work at the site. cc: Jana Huerter. d • I JUL 211998 MEMORANDUM ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT • • DATE: 7 2-1'9g • TO: Long Range Planning FROM. Jim Hanson, Development Services Division Director SUBJECT: New Preliminary Application: Vi/(, /i'if Jlj*tii.i f id�G24.Le. • LOCATION: Q SQ. '`/3E4 (3t . �v • Please review the attached preliminary project plans for consistency with applicable Comprehensive Plan Policies. Please] submit.your written comments to Pe-k/r no later than 1744- . Thank you. We will not be able to include comments received after this date in the presentation/summary we prepare for the applicant. eAj.1219Jn‘o A/4-- • • • . - • • • • DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISIOI . WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS . ; _ . :.:,..1AND:USE,..:!pgRmITc:!Ayp.m!T.TA4.:::1::::::., ::IiiViyygP.:111 ..01Y!.ic:::191ff!„P;:! .!::.!i:i'1::!!:51:::!::::1:::.1.:.::!i....:.:.!:,:.1r.::1:661,4-gi4;iiiitINgilgiVikii.::i ...... .........• • : ......:;!RQUIREMENTs::i!i2ii :::i.:::.i:::;H-:::,::. igit;15Y.;:ii:ig:::: ..iijaiiiigPY:iiigiqgiiiiil ..,i;::iii5:-wiji!!!!.!:::!:::.:.::A.::.;m!:.:0,::;:;:im:;;:.0.1:0.:::::10....!A!....:,!ii .i.::::::g...:ii:'.4.'i. Calculations, SUrvey, • dril N/A ().....416i64..::. ..:6tiit::04.4i.: : "..: ::.:.....:.:.::: .:.iii..1.1 ...:.:i,H-i: .;:::.....X. ki6!i:3;i.11:1161111:111111:: :!.:]:...::::::hliiFid./..Aiii:Miliii.:4,:zairt;.:.:. .A. :::::!!.. _ . Drainage Report 2 jC3 )2>kle/41.,c4sAjt jafiti Elevations Architectural3AND4 Elevations, Grading 2 ..)P - E...a-..iiii6::: 6ii:6:.•iigii•ig:i:•.0666i.;:ad.. 6i,y)4• ••;!....'••:i:M :H; :•::::•:.ed:::,;•:•Ni :igg::::iii•:ii::WORII]ligi:g•Wililgi:.0:8:::::::? :.i:igiiinegiiiaiia::::Mgai Existing Easements (Recorded Copy) 4 eq F1'-,:".,—•.'.. • .".,::'"*.'::''".V,'•:*,:•••••',":::-':','.:-'%::';':':%;"•i:::,....%::?.:.'''::'::':::::.:':' ::'''''...'''. ' ''i**-:',.:Ii -':ia".:::ii:i.: :::?*:i:ii:;.iii*.i.::::::a *.:•:.i::ii•:i.:1.:.:.*:::i:i::.ii:.%.,::::'Iff.]:::V:::::ii....§:,;;I:;;MiM..4.5::::0::;::::00i:i. : .'; ' ood P1419;M@OI.7::.if:;qppljPN..4.:::,:..*: •::,".. ..;;:':'..S.:.. .E ..':....;:....'.. ..•:::....':;:i.i.c.:, ::.!,:;ii..:i.::i.:',..:..:iii.:::.i...:.ffiiiM ..:: ::i.:::::::..'.:i'::;44:,-.:,.::....:::.;:::::*:,!::i:i:m::::::.::.:7*::::i::::::::::::.:i.6::*::**::::*-:.•:::::::'•:::. Floor Plans 3AND4 Gactachnicat..:Rapprt. ...:.:::„.....i..,..,... ...-........;:::::..!':..:::::::::::j; .:.;;:t7t1:::,:15::?,: ii.i.:i: Z.M.MipMilim.if:.;,D.m;•: ::::@.1i.;::Isi,:g.N.i;:mii.:::M:ii.W.;I:..i::::ip...:.04.9.::;;;0.:g:;',:.;:imi.i:!...iii.:;:::.T., Grading Plan, COnceptual 2 qr00Pg:•Flgl.jP0100#4i:i.::::...:;:;!:.:1:1?11.*:::::::.:::I...J.Z.:*.:51 King County Assessor's Map Indicating Site4 • . — .•-.......:"....................."'............ '::"::: :*.:::.:...fl: .:'::::.::.1::.RIN:M•giggi:0:.i:ali:•Y::e:,:glibritiM.:::::i..i;;i.:::MW•:;:.:.'.E•MiNggii.i:j0;:::Mi.E;;:'i 4 Landscaping Plan,. ::!06i14001:iali • ....... •••••••::.:-:....!. ::::?•:i ., . ••••.--.....c ..i,,i,...::•::...::•...•::....:*,:ii::.•:i:::y.:::: ...:?.-.:,.i:i,..:::.i.:::i:::.i:•."::::.:i.,.i,..•:::ii,:::.,.::.::.:::!.:::::.:.:*.ii:..miiiii.::•::iimiini.:i.:g.:.:i.:.:ii::.:iii:*.:Ei,.::iii:ii::::.i:Kiiiiii Legal Description 4 List 1pf$urroo'cp4d-popotty;c#00rs 4 . . :....• :.. .:.:;. ..•-.. ,i, .:i.:::.....i....::,:i,„:.5.•:..:..,;:R:.i..i...N. ..:.:::.,:: -...!..:::.:,;:.!.:.•..:....,.... ..:•:..,...i........::i...:.y.?.i:.:.,0.!i,,ii.::::.::::,.1:::.::,.,,:-:::.:!....:i,..g::.ii...:::.,ui:,>:.ii Mailing Labels for Property Owners 4 .. ....... ...... ....... ..................„.... ....... ...... Map of Existing tife. ridifiiiri: :,; Master Application Form4 Monument•Cardi!,..(onep (rO.Ohpr11:01t)...:1-: Parking, Lot Coverage & Landscaping ,,....-'-:•Ii-.. ata, AAnalysis 4 ' CY/". /k .,--1-711,::::"-../.•''.‘"P. km A alYdill3/1/Lahl4' 0.. ::13ectiCtiO11 :(PNITs).•4:.:. :.• .....::............:•::••......:::'•:•••:.!. ..:.::, •::::::::,.1::.-1!1:•.ii,.:::':....4.:.••::::::!..iii s'i!!::.!!.i1-;:::.:Vii.:igilligigi..:iiig.:1:::::!...i0.1:.:•;... .ffilii,MNIVER:iigini:Z:i;:::,i'q:::::!:6:!•iii;;A::: Postage Public Works Approval (efte 6 '-' '.' ....-..'.........:" IQ,:...............':.:1::Ii.i. :ENE:-.1.E. ..!;!...ile:Fnell fi.1.•::::::;..f..Ri.:..::..!i;.,.:.:...:7.....:':::.':::::::.'.:11'.-:...:','.:.:1.....:'!1'...::'..1•111:::,....:E....:.'::.:!:..1:.::.:::$::: :1::::::1:::.•.: .• 7e Title Report or Plat Certificate 4 eryt .. ..... ........... .... ............„N 44 ........../ . Topography Map (5' contours)3 • • .•: '. • • •).14V•:.:•...::;.;::.!. .:::..I.C.::,:!•:•:.i.:!..:i•.:1!..:•:-:::;:i::'.1:11,!..1.;E:MI:'.ii:I.:!11:P..::...VM..—..,•—•::::::..t.i!..i'••:•::::::.:.:Ii!...11.:•::::::::::::!:13ii:iiiii:.::•3:11:il.::!::::1•,:i'l::!.?i:E.1:1:i.....i:•!..!:::::•1:::. Traffic Study 2 Tree Cutting/Vegetation Clearing plan 4 •• ... •cillq.j.•.: 1:::$0.01.111111: 1.3.1•4/A11.1,1111111.11.111N310. . / Utilities Plan, Genpralized2 * .iltS 64064.7eligOnLibt co ‘ItkeAbtoS)5L,A4' Wetlands Delineationirk40•4 • ••.. • /04,..... •::. ......!:;:.!:•;!T.::•:::::.....::::: ::..,:.::;.:::!,:.. •:•::::::.,..,..,:..bliks:::,:..,.:::.:::„.- :....::::;,:.i.:1::„.::::..;:F.,...::::::„,.,...:,:i;.........,...:........:::.:,..... Wetlands Planting Plan 4 lifA . . . ... .. v.vetiabdsztudy4 , i This requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services Section PROJECT N.lillitif; [(C9 Med • Cf/ 2. Public Works Plan Review Section' 3. Building Section • DATE: - A,Ust (7, R1,(17 4. Development Planning Section h:1division.s Wevelop.ser\dev.plan.ing\waiver.xls % Geo OEngineers . June 5, 1998 • Consulting Engineers and Geoscientists Valley Medical Center Offices in Washington, 400 South 43rd Street • Oregon,and Alaska Renton, Washington 98055 • Attention: Romulo Almeda • We are pleased to present two copies of our "Report, Geotechnical Engineering Services, Proposed Warehouse Additions, Valley Medical Center, Renton, Washington". The original scope of our services is presented in our proposal dated March 31, 1998. Our services were authorized by Romulo Almeda on April 2, 1998. We were directed to modify our drilling program by Romulo Almeda and Dan Jardine of Mahlum Architects.on April 8, 1998 and subsequently prepared a revised proposal dated May 21, 1998 presenting our final scope of services. Portions of the results of our study have been discussed with Dan Jardine of Mahlum Architects and Jerry Griffith of Skilling Ward Magnusson Barkshire, Inc. We presented preliminary recommendations • in our memorandum dated May 3, 1998. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you on this project. Please call if you have questions regarding this report or when we can be of er se i •. o er ru Lt O? T� Oi�MG Aeti / / DEv CM/ OF F�l1T 0 la Anil 2 4 REGeNIED • jp J. W. rth147. : `rincipal JJM:JWK:pb Document ID: P:\finals\2202014 Report.doc cc: Mahlum Architects Skilling Ward Magnusson Barkshire 2505 Third Avenue, Suite 219 , 1301 Fifth, Suite 3200 Seattle, Washington 98121 Seattle, Washington 98101 Attn: Dan Jardine Attn: Jerry Griffith Geoi?ngincers,Inc. Plaza 6OO huilciing 600 Stewart St..Suite 1215 Seattle. 198 1 OI Tclejluric(.(,6)728-2(i71 \C\C\\'g(•O(i Igl tit 7 C Report Geotechnical Engineering Services Proposed Warehouse Additions • • Valley Medical Center • Renton, Washington • June 5, 1998 • For Valley Medical Center 1 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION SCOPE 1 SITE DESCRIPTION 3 BACKGROUND INFORMATION 3 SURFACE CONDITIONS 3 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 3 Site Explorations 3 Soil Conditions 3 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4 GENERAL 4 CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS 4 SITE PREPARATION AND EARTHWORK • 5 Site Preparation 5 Structural Fill 5 Temporary Slopes 6 Permanent Cut and Fill Slopes 7 Wall Backfill 7 FOUDATION SUPPORT 7 Shallow Foundation Support 7 Deep Foundation Support 8 RECONSTRUCTION OF FLOOR SLAB AREAS 11 SEISMICITY 11 General 11 Uniform Building Code (UBC) Site Coefficient 12 Design Earthquake Level 12 Liquefaction Potential 12 DRAINAGE CONSIDERATIONS 12 (LIMITATIONS 13 I . FIGURES Figure No. Vicinity Map 1 Site Plan 2 . • G e o E n g i n e e r s i File No. 2202-01400-1130/060598 APPENDIX • APPENDIX A FIELD EXPLORATIONS AND LABORATORY TESTING 1 FIELD EXPLORATIONS 1 LABORATORY TESTING 1 APPENDIX A FIGURES Figure No. Soil Classification System A-1 Key to Boring Log Symbols A-2 • Log Boring A-3...A-8 G e o E n g i n e e r.s ii File No. 2202-014-00-1130/060598 REPORT GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES PROPOSED WAREHOUSE ADDITIONS VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER RENTON, WASHINGTON FOR VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of our geotechnical engineering services for the proposed addition to the existing warehouse building located at Valley Medical Center in Renton, Washington. The existing warehouse is located in the west portion of the Valley Medical Center campus on the north side of the engineering building and west of the main hospital building. The project location is shown in the Vicinity Map, Figure 1. We understand that development plans include constructing a second floor level to the warehouse with future plans to add a third floor level. We also understand that the existing warehouse building will remain in operation while the new structure is constructed above it. Final design details have not been developed, but it is our understanding that the building will likely be supported on a combination of shallow foundations and auger-cast piles. Columns will be located at about 30 feet on center. Foundation loads on each column are expected to be as follows: • Axial loads: 324 to 389 kips, plus 189 and 145 kips seismic, respectively. No uplift. • Lateral loads: 127 to 177 kips seismic(east-west and north -south, respectively). We also understand that shallow foundations will be supported at the same elevation as adjacent shallow foundations that support the existing building. SCOPE The purpose of our geotechnical engineering services is to perform subsurface explorations and engineering analyses, and provide recommendations for foundation support and design of the proposed warehouse addition. Our specific scope of services includes the following tasks: 1. Review available reports and studies for the site and surrounding area and complete a brief site visit to evaluate exploration requirements and access. 2. Drill two borings to depths of about 22 feet at the warehouse site using truck-mounted drilling equipment. The borings will extend about 10 to 15 feet into the dense native soil. We will also drill two borings with portable drilling equipment to about 10 to 15 feet along the east and north sides of the warehouse where access is limited. 3. Drill one boring to a depth of about 19 feet at the laundry facility site using truck mounted. drilling equipment. (Note: We provided a boring log and site sketch to complete this task). G e o E n g i n e e r s I File No.2202-01 4-00-1 1 3 0/0060 5 98 4. Evaluate pertinent physical and engineering characteristics of the foundation soils based on laboratory tests performed on samples obtained from the borings and comparison with ' previous data referenced above. The laboratory tests include moisture/density determinations on selected samples obtained from the explorations. 5. Describe the subsurface soil and ground water conditions. 6. Provide recommendations for earthwork including the following: • Requirements for stripping, removal of soft,organic or other unsuitable material, • Suitability of on-site soil for use as structural fill, • Imported structural fill specifications, • Placement and compaction of structural fill for support of parking areas and adjacent improvements, • Utility trench backfill placement and compaction, • Effects of weather and construction equipment on the site soils, • General recommendations for erosion and sedimentation control. 7. Provide recommendations for allowable temporary cut slope inclinations and permanent cut and fill slope inclinations. 8. Provide recommendations for temporary dewatering during construction. This will include recommendations for general dewatering of excavations and trenches, as appropriate. 9. Evaluate foundation support options including shallow spread footings, piles and drilled piers. 10. Attend one design team meeting to discuss our conclusions and evaluation of foundation options. 11. Develop geotechnical design recommendations for selected foundation types to support the building on a combination of shallow spread footings, and either drilled piers or pile foundations, as appropriate. Our recommendations include the following: • Allowable capacity and settlement estimates for shallow spread footings, or allowable axial capacity versus penetration requirements for downward and upward loads (including allowable end bearing and skin friction) and settlement estimates for piers and piles. • Allowable earth pressure and base friction coefficient for resisting lateral loads on shallow foundation elements. • Allowable lateral pile or drilled pier capacity as a function of lateral deflections for fixed and pinned pile or pier cap conditions. • Capacity reductions for group action of piles and/or piers. • Recommendations for construction monitoring and testing requirements, as appropriate. 12. Provide recommendations for seismic design including site coefficient in accordance with Uniform Building Code. 13. Provide a written report presenting our findings, conclusions and recommendations, along with supporting field and laboratory data. G e o E n g i n e e r s 2 File No.2202-01 4-00-1 1 30/00 60 598 SITE DESCRIPTION BACKGROUND INFORMATION We were provided several sources of background information related to the existing facilities for our review. These included the following: 1. "Report of Soils Investigation, Proposed Valley General Hospital, Renton, Washington for Public Hospital District No. 1" by Dames & Moore dated May 11, 1967. 2. "Summary Report, Engineering Services During Site Work, Proposed Valley General Hospital, Renton, Washington by Dames & Moore dated October 30, 1967. 3. "Soils Investigation, Parking Lot Addition, Valley General Hospital, Renton, Washington" by Dames& Moore dated December 18, 1978. 4. Portion of report prepared by Roger'Lowe Associates, Inc. dated April 25, 1980 completed for additions to the hospital building. 5. Site plan of the existing warehouse area showing original building and addition. SURFACE CONDITIONS The existing warehouse, a one story building, is about 180 feet long (north to south) and 60 feet wide (east to west). The original warehouse was constructed in 1974. A 40-foot long addition was constructed in 1980 at the north end of the original warehouse. We understand that the finish floor in the warehouse is at Elevation 57.5 feet. Paved parking is located along much of the west side of the warehouse. An exposed on-grade slab is located within a fenced area (emergency generator) along the west-side of the warehouse at the north end. Lawn areas with sidewalks are located to the north, east and south of the warehouse. The ground surface in the warehouse area rises from about Elevation 52 feet in the northwest portion of the site to about Elevation 64 feet in the southeast portion. The ground surface is about Elevation 64 feet along much of the east side of the warehouse. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Site Explorations We explored subsurface soil and groundwater conditions at the site by drilling six borings to depths of about 6.5 to 21.5 feet below the existing ground surface. Gregory Drilling drilled two borings (B-1 and B-2) on April 8, 1998 using truck-mounted hollow-stem auger drilling equipment. CN Drilling drilled four borings (B-3a, B-3b, B-3c and B-4) on April 8, 1998 using portable solid stem auger drilling equipment to access the landscaped portions of the site. The locations of the explorations are shown in the Site Plan, Figure 2. The details of our field exploration program, laboratory testing and exploration logs are presented in Appendix A. Soil Conditions Subsurface soil conditions encountered in the borings generally consist of dense and hard native soil along the east side of the existing building (borings B-3a, B-3b and B-3c) at elevations above the planned foundation level. We understand that excavation for a recently constructed G e o E n g i n e e r s 3 File No.2202-014-00-1130/0060598 r r utilidor that extends along the east side of the warehouse encountered very dense native soil in this area. On the north and west sides of the building (borings B-1, B-2 and B-4) we encountered loose to medium dense fill overlying dense and hard native deposits. The fill in these borings was encountered to a depth of about 8 to 10 feet below the planned foundation level. The firm native soil encountered in our borings includes dense to very dense silty sand with gravel and hard silt. No ground water was encountered in the borings. However, ground water conditions should be expected to fluctuate as a.function of season, precipitation and other factors CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS GENERAL Based on the results of our explorations, our understanding of the anticipated design loads and analyses, we conclude that the proposed addition may be supported on a combination of shallow and deep foundations. We therefore recommend that shallow foundations be used to support the east portion of the proposed addition where dense and hard native soil is expected to be present at foundation elevation, and that auger-cast piles be used to support portions of the structure where fill is present below the proposed foundation level. Based on our understanding of the proposed structural design, we expect that footing and pile cap excavations will extend no deeper than the bottom of the shallow footings supporting the existing building, and that temporary shoring will not be necessary. It is possible the adjacent structures and utilities may require temporary shoring for support. CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS Based on our discussions with Jerry Griffith at Skilling.Ward Magnusson Barkshire, Inc. (SWMB), we expect that footing and pile cap excavations will extend no deeper than the bottom of the shallow foundations supporting the existing building. We therefore expect that temporary shoring will not be necessary and that excavations will be completed as open cuts. It is possible the adjacent structures or utilities may be affected by the excavations and some temporary shoring may be required. GeoEngineers should be contacted to review the contractors excavation plan so shoring requirements can be evaluated if necessary. We expect that auger-cast piles for support of much of the building can be installed using conventional crane supported drilling equipment. However, installation of auger-cast piles within the existing building for interior column support will require either removing portions of the existing building roof for crane access or using low-overhead drilling equipment capable of operating within the building. In our experience, both approaches are suitable for this type of construction. Since it is desirable to keep the existing building operational for some of its current functions, we recommend that consideration he given to working within the building with low- overhead drilling equipment. GeoEngineers 4 . File No.2202-01 4-00-1 1 30/0060598 We expect that the new structure will be supported on a combination of shallow foundations (east portion of building) and auger-cast piles (west portion). Our explorations were completed outside the existing building and limited to readily accessible portions of the site. We recommend that explorations be completed at each column location as part of the contractors scope to assess the appropriate final design configuration for foundation support. This will allow determination of column locations where shallow foundation support can be used and column locations where • auger-cast piles will be necessary to support the building loads. We expect that full time monitoring by a representative of GeoEngineers will be necessary during construction to evaluate subgrade conditions and determine the appropriateness of shallow foundations versus deep foundations at various foundation locations around the structure. SITE PREPARATION AND EARTHWORK Site Preparation We expect that site preparation and earthwork will include removal of existing pavement and walkways within the work area, and excavation to achieve design subgrade elevation in the planned footing and pile cap areas. Excavation depths in the area of pile caps will likely be on the order of 3 to 5 feet. On the east side of the building where spread footings will be constructed excavations will be on the order of 6 to 8 feet below the existing ground surface. Suitable cut slopes as described in a subsequent section of this report should be used to protect adjacent structures and reduce the risk to workers within the excavations. Effective erosion and sedimentation controls must be implemented during construction so that potential impacts to the adjacent areas are minimized. The erosion potential of the on-site soils is moderate. The erosion and sedimentation control measures used for this project should be in accordance with the requirements of the city of Renton. Structural Fill New fills in building and pavement areas should be placed and compacted as structural fill. The suitability Of existing fill or native soil for use as structural fill will depend on its gradation and moisture content. In our opinion, the near surface silty soils can be used as structural fill where compaction to 90 percent of maximum dry density (MDD) (determined in accordance with ASTM D-1557). Much of the on-site soils will not be suitable for use in areas where compaction to at least 95 percent is required. The on-site soils will not be suitable for use as fill during periods of wet weather. We recommend, therefore, that the project be planned to include importing structural fill for backfill around pile caps and footings and below floor slab areas where compaction to at least 95 percent of MDD is required. We recommend that imported structural fill consist of sand and gravel or crushed. rock containing less than 5 percent fines (material passing U.S. Standard No. 200 sieve) by weight relative to the fraction of the material passing the 3/4-inch sieve. This material should be free of debris, organic contaminants and rock fragments larger than 6 inches. GeoEngineers 5 File No.2202-014-00-1130/0060598 Structural fill should be mechanically compacted to a firm, non-yielding condition. Structural fill placed in building areas should be compacted to at least 95 percent of MDD. Pavement area fill, including utility trench backfill and fill to support walkways should be compacted to at least 90 percent of MDD, except for the upper 2 feet below finished subgrade surface, which should be compacted to at least 95 percent of MDD. Structural fill should be placed in loose lifts not exceeding 8 to 10 inches in thickness. Each lift should be conditioned to the proper moisture content and compacted to the specified density before placing subsequent lifts. We recommend that a representative from our firm be present to perform in-place moisture-density tests in the fill to evaluate whether the compaction specifications are being met, and advise on any modifications to procedure which might be appropriate for the conditions encountered. Temporary Slopes We anticipate that un-shored temporary cuts will be used. for the footing and pile cap excavations. The stability of cut slopes is a function of soil type, ground water conditions, slope inclination, slope height and nearby surface loads. Oversteepened temporary cut slopes could impact the stability of adjacent work areas and existing utilities, and endanger personnel. All cut slopes and temporary excavation support, if necessary, must be constructed or installed, and maintained in accordance with the requirements of the appropriate governmental agency. We expect that temporary near-vertical cut slopes can be used for portions of the excavations on the east side of the building where dense till or hard silt was encountered. For excavations deeper than 4 feet but less than about 8 feet in the dense till and hard silt, the lower 4 feet can be near-vertical and the slope above cut to 1H:1V (horizontal to vertical). Temporary cut slopes for excavations on the west side of the building, and in the interior of the building where existing fill is likely present in the proposed foundation areas should be inclined no steeper than 1-1/2H:1V. The above guidelines assume that surface loads such as equipment loads and materials storage will be kept a sufficient distance away from the top of the cut so that the stability of the excavation is not affected. We recommend that surface loads be kept away from the top of the cut, a distance at least equal to the height of the cut. The guidelines also assume that the excava- tions will be dewatered in such a.way that significant seepage is not present on the slope face. Flatter slopes and/or shoring may be necessary for portions of the excavation where there is significant seepage in order to maintain the stability of the cut. It should be expected that the excavation face in the fill soil will experience some sloughing and raveling. Berms, swales, or drainage ditches should be installed around the perimeter of the excavation to intercept surface runoff and reduce the potential for sloughing and erosion of the cut slope. G e o E n g i n e e r s 6 File No.2202-014-00-1130/0060598 Permanent Cut and Fill Slopes We recommend that permanent cut and fill slopes be constructed at 2H:1V, or flatter. Flatter slopes might be considered for ease of maintenance. Unprotected cut and fill slopes will be subject to erosion until a protective vegetative cover is well established. Therefore, we recommend that slope surfaces be mulched and planted as soon as practical to minimize the potential for erosion. Appropriate drainage measures, as described below under the "Drainage Considerations" section of this report, should be implemented to collect and control surface runoff and ground water seepage. Wall Backfill We recommend that a minimum 12-inch-thick layer of free draining crushed rock or sand and gravel with less than 3 percent fines be used for backfill adjacent to existing building walls. The zone of free draining backfill should extend from the base of the wall to within 1 foot of the finished ground surface. The upper 1 foot should consist of relatively impermeable on-site soil or be capped with pavement to reduce surface water infiltration. We expect that an existing drainage system is in place. This system should typically include smooth-walled, perforated drainpipe having a minimum diameter of 4 inches which is embedded within the zone of free-draining material at the base of the wall along its entire length. This drainpipe should discharge to a tightline collection system. We recommend fill within 5 feet of the building walls be compacted to between 90 and 92 percent of MDD except for the upper 2 feet which should be compacted to at least 95 percent of MDD if supporting pavement or walkways (in accordance with ASTM D-1557). Overcompaction near the wall should be avoided to prevent build-up of excessive lateral pressures on the wall: • FOUDATION SUPPORT Shallow Foundation Support Footing Design. We recommend that shallow foundations be used to support the anticipated design loads where dense and hard native soils are encountered at foundation depth. We understand that shallow foundations will be located at the same elevation as the existing building foundations. We recommend that exterior column footings be founded at least 18 inches below lowest adjacent finish grade. Interior column footings should be found at least 12 inches below the bottom of the adjacent floor slab. Column footings should be at least 3 feet wide. Footings supported as recommended may be designed for an allowable bearing pressure of 7,500 pounds per square foot (pst) for the total of all dead and live loads. This value is exclusive of the weight of the footing and any overlying backfill. The allowable bearing pressure may be increased by one-third when considering wind or seismic loads. G e o E n g i n e e r s 7 File No.2202-01 4-00-1 1 30/0 060 5 98 Based on our understanding of the proposed building loads,we expect that footings will be about 6 feet square. We therefore estimate the total settlement of footings supporting the proposed addition should be on the order of 1/2 inch and postconstruction settlements should be less than about 1/2 inch. Postconstruction differential settlements between comparably loaded column footings are not expected to exceed 1/2 inch. Lateral Resistance. The available resistance to lateral foundation loading is a function of the • frictional resistance that can be developed on the base, and the passive resistance that can develop on the face of below-grade elements. The allowable frictional resistance for foundation elements may be computed using a coefficient of friction of 0.35, applied to vertical dead-load forces. The allowable passive resistance on the face of footings or other embedded foundation elements may lie computed using and equivalent fluid density of 300 pounds per cubic foot (pcf) (triangular distribution) for structural fill if all soil extending out from the face of the foundation element for a distance at least equal to two and one-half times the height of the element consist of structural fill compacted to at least 95 percent of MDD. The above coefficient of friction and passive equivalent fluid density value includes a factor of safety of about 1.5. Deep Foundation Support General. We expect that deep foundations will be required for support of much of the building where existing fill is present at the anticipated foundation depth. The following sections summarize our recommendations for 14- and 18-inch diameter auger-cast piles and 30-inch diameter drilled shafts. For both systems of foundation support the piles/shafts must penetrate to at least a depth of 20 feet and into the dense native soil at least 10 feet. We understand that auger-cast piles will likely be used for the project because their installation will be more suitable for existing site conditions. Auger-Cast Piles. We recommend that auger-cast piles extend to a depth of at least 20 feet and at least 10 feet into the dense and hard native soil. Auger-cast piles may be designed for the following values: Axial Pile Capacity Pile Diameter (inches) Downward (tons) Uplift (tons) 14 60 15 18 80 20 These values include a factor of safety of about 2.5. These capacity values may be increased by one-third when considering design loads of short duration such as wind or seismic forces. The allowable axial capacities presented above are based on the strength of the supporting soils for the penetrations indicated and ignore the weight of the pile. The capacities apply to single piles. If piles within groups are spaced at least 3-pile diameters on center, no reduction for pile group action is required. • G e o E n g i n e e r s 8 File No.2202-01 4-00-1 1 3 0/00605 98 Allowable lateral loads on closely spaced piles or other subgrade elements are, in part, a function of the spacing between these elements. We recommend a minimum pile spacing of 3-pile diameters center-to-center, both parallel and normal to the principal direction of load application. Allowable lateral capacities for various pile spacings, expressed in terms of D (pile diameter) parallel to the direction of load application are tabulated below. Allowable lateral capacities are presented for various pile head deflections. Lateral Pile Capacity -Fixed Head Condition Pile Pile Spacing, Allowable Lateral Capacity(kips) Diameter Parallel to Deflection, inches _ (D, inches) direction of 0.25 0.5 1.0 loading 14 3D 6 10 16 4D 7 11 17 6D 8 14 21 8D 12 20 30, 18 3D 10 16 26 4D 11 17 28 6D 14 22 35 8D 20 31 50 Lateral Pile Capacity -Free Head Condition Pile Pile Spacing, Allowable Lateral Capacity (kips) Diameter Parallel to Deflection, inches (D, inches) direction of 0.25 0.5 1.0 loading 14 3D 1 3 6 4D 1 4 7 6D 2 5 8 8D 3 7 . 12 18 3D . 4 6 10 4D 5 7 11 6D 6 8 14 8D 8 12 20 We recommend that reinforcing sufficient to resist the expected bending moments be installed full depth in the 14- and 18-inch-diameter auger-cast piles. G e o E n g i n e e r s • 9 File No.2202-014-00-1130/0060598 • Drilled Shafts. We understand that drilled shafts will likely not be used to support the structure. However, the following paragraphs of this report present conclusions and recommendations for drilled shafts that were presented in our preliminary memorandum dated May 3, 1998. This information is presented here for reference only. If the configuration of the proposed structure changes and drilled shafts are considered further for support of the structure, we should be contacted to provide further evaluation as necessary. We conclude that 30-inch diameter drilled shafts extending to a depth of at least 20 feet and at least 10 feet into the dense and hard native soil may be designed for an allowable axial capacity of 130 tons. An uplift capacity of 30 tons may be used for_the drilled shafts. These values include a factor of safety of about 2.5. These capacity values may be increased by one-third when considering design loads of short duration such as wind or seismic forces. The allowable axial capacities presented above are based on the strength of the supporting soils for the penetrations indicated and ignore the weight of the shaft. The capacities apply to single shafts. If shafts within groups are spaced at least 3-shaft diameters on center, no reduction for group action is required Allowable lateral capacities for various shaft spacings, expressed in terms of D (shaft diameter)parallel to the direction of load application are tabulated below. Lateral Shaft Capacity Shaft Spacing Allowable Shaft Capacity (Parallel to direction of loading) (kips) 3D 40 4D 45 6D 55 8D 80 The above lateral capacities are based on shaft-head fixity against rotation and a maximum shaft deflection of approximately 1/2 inch.. We recommend that reinforcing sufficient to resist the expected bending moments be installed full depth in the 30-inch-diameter drilled shafts. Settlement. We estimate that the total settlement of auger-cast piles designed and installed as recommended will be about '/ inch. Most of this settlement is expected to occur rapidly as loads are applied. Postconstruction differential settlements between adjacent columns should less than '/;inch, depending upon the distribution of building loads. Installation. We recommend that auger-cast piles be installed by an experienced contractor to the recommended penetration using a continuous-flight, hollow-stem auger. The pile is constructed by pumping grout under pressure through the hollow stem as the auger is withdrawn. Reinforcing steel for bending and uplift loads is placed in the fresh grout column immediately after withdrawal of the auger. We recommend that installation of piles be sequenced to avoid G e o E n g i n e e r s 10 File No.2202-014-00-1130/0060598 disturbance of fresh grout in previously cast piles. We recommend that minimum 3,500 pounds per square inch (psi)grout strength be used for auger-cast piles. Grout pumps must be fitted with a volume-measuring device and pressure gauge so that the • volume of grout placed in each pile and the pressure head maintained during pumping can be measured. A minimum grout line pressure of 100 psi should be maintained. The rate of auger withdrawal should be controlled during grouting such that a minimum head of 10 feet of grout is maintained above the auger tip during withdrawal and the volume of grout pumped into the drilled hole is equal to at least 115 percent of the theoretical hole volume. I We recommend that pile installation be monitored by a member of our staff who will observe the drilling operations, record indicated penetrations into the supporting soils, monitor grout . injection procedures, record the volume of grout placed in each pile relative to the calculated , volume of the hole, and evaluate the adequacy of individual pile penetrations. RECONSTRUCTION OF FLOOR SLAB AREAS We recommend that new floor slabs constructed to replace slabs removed during construction be supported on structural fill compacted to at least 95 percent of MDD as recommended above under Site Preparation. We did not complete explorations in the existing floor slab area but expect that the floor slab is supported on a capillary break and may include a vapor retarder .(plastic sheeting. We recommend that new floor slab be constructed on a base course consisting of at least 4 inches of well-graded sand and gravel or crushed rock containing less than 3 percent fines. The base course will provide uniform support and serve as a capillary break to reduce moisture migration through the slab. If a vapor retarder is present it should be replaced at areas disturbed'during construction. A 2-inch-thick layer of sand should be placed over the vapor retarder to protect it during slab construction and to aid in uniform curing of the concrete. SEISMICITY General The Puget Sound area is a seismically active region and has experienced thousands of earthquakes in historical time. Seismicity in this region is attributed primarily to the interaction between the Pacific, Juan de Fuca and North American plates. The Juan de Fuca plate is subducting beneath the North American Plate. Each year 1,000 to 2,000 earthquakes occur in Oregon and Washington. However, only 5 to 20 of these are typically felt because the majority of'recorded earthquakes are'smaller than Richter magnitude 3. In recent years two large earthquakes occurred which resulted in some liquefaction in loose alluvial deposits and significant damage to some structures. The first earthquake, which was centered in the Olympia area, occurred in 1949 with a Richter magnitude of 7.1. The second earthquake, which occurred in 1965, was centered between Seattle and Tacoma and had a Richter magnitude of 6.5. C e o E n g i n e e r s 11 File No.2202-014-00-1130/0060598 1 t Uniform Building Code (UBC) Site Coefficient The Puget Sound region is designated as a Seismic Zone 3 in the 1994 and 1997 editions of the Uniform Building Code (UBC): For Zone 3 locations, a Seismic Zone Factor (Z) of 0.30 is. applicable. In our opinion, the soil profile at the.site is best characterized as Type S2 (1994 UBC)or Type Sc (1997 UBC). Design Earthquake Level The key seismic design parameters are the peak acceleration and the Richter magnitude of the earthquake. In general, a design earthquake is chosen based on a probability of exceedence (the probability that the design earthquake will not be exceeded over a given time period). The level of seismicity recommended in the 1994 edition of the UBC for human occupancy buildings is an earthquake with a 10 percent probability of exceedence in a 50-year period. The design earthquake event that corresponds to this probability of exceedence is an earthquake with a Richter magnitude of 7.5 and a peak horizontal ground acceleration of approximately 0.3g. Liquefaction Potential Liquefaction is a condition where soils experience a rapid loss of internal strength as a consequence of strong ground shaking. Ground settlement, lateral spreading and/or sand boils may result from soil liquefaction. Structures supported on liquefied soils can suffer foundation settlement or lateral movement that may be severely damaging to the structures. Conditions favorable to liquefaction occur in loose to medium dense, clean to moderately silty sand that is below the ground water table. This condition is present at this site. Therefore, we performed an engineering evaluation of the liquefaction potential of the site soils. The evaluation of liquefaction potential is dependent on numerous parameters including soil type and grain size distribution, soil density, depth to ground water, in-situ static ground stresses, and the earthquake induced ground stresses. Typically, the liquefaction potential of a site is evaluated by comparing the cyclic shear stress ratio induced by an earthquake with the cyclic shear stress ratio required to cause liquefaction. The cyclic shear stress ratio required to cause liquefaction was estimated using an empirical procedure based on the in-situ static ground stresses, the blow count data obtained during sampling in the borings, and the design earthquake magnitude. The results of our explorations and analyses indicate that the loose to medium dense silty sand encountered in the borings has a low potential for liquefaction during an earthquake with a Richter magnitude of 7.5 or greater. DRAINAGE CONSIDERATIONS We expect that shallow perched groundwater may be encountered during foundation excavation. We anticipate that this water can be temporarily handled during construction by ditching and pumping from sumps, as necessary. All collected water should be safely routed to suitable discharge points. G e'o E n g i n e e r s 12 File No.2202-014-00-1130/0060598 I ' In our opinion, additional foundation drainage systems are not necessary since the structure likely has a perimeter drainage system in place. However, construction activities will likely disrupt or damage the existing system and careful attention should be directed toward protecting or repairing the existing system before backfilling foundations. This is especially important on the east side of the building where below grade walls will be exposed during construction and backfilled following foundation construction. A 12-inch wide zone of drain material should be placed against the building walls to intercept drainage. Additional recommendations for wall 1 ackfill are discussed above under Wall Backfill in the Site Preparation and Earthwork Section of this report. LIMITATIONS We have prepared this report for use by Valley Medical Center, Mahlum Architects, SWMB and other members of the design team for use in the design of a portion of this project. The conclusions and recommendations in this report should be applied in their entirety. The data and report should be provided to prospective contractors for bidding or estimating purposes; but our report, conclusions and interpretations should not be construed as a warranty of the subsurface conditions. If there are any changes in the grades, location, configuration or type of construction planned, the conclusions and recommendations presented in this report might not be fully applicable. If such changes are made, we should be engaged to review our conclusions and recommendations and to provide written modification or verification, as appropriate. When the design is finalized, we recommend that we be engaged to review those portions of the specifications and drawings that relate to geotechnical considerations to see that our recommendations have been interpreted and implemented as intended. • There are possible variations in subsurface conditions between the locations of explorations. Variations may also occur with time. Our explorations were completed outside the building footprint and some of the proposed foundation work will be completed within the building. Some contingency for unanticipated conditions should be included in the project budget and schedule. We strongly recommend that sufficient monitoring, testing and consultation be provided by our firm during construction to (1) determine if the conditions encountered are consistent with those indicated by the explorations, (2) provide recommendations for design changes should the conditions revealed during the work differ from those anticipated, and (3) evaluate whether or not earthwork and foundation installation activities comply with the contract plans and specifications. Within the limitations of scope, schedule and budget, our services have been executed in accordance with generally accepted practices in this area at the time the report was prepared. No warranty or other conditions, express or implied, should be understood. 0 ei o E n g i n e e r s 13 File No.2202-01 4-00-1 1 30/0060 5 98 We trust this provides the information you require at this time. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you on this project. Please contact us should you have any questions concerning our findings or recommendations, or should you require additional information. p tfully sub itt , McF� ginee , c ./AIP t �� ��� McFadden, P.E. w roject Manager , SfONAL�� 13312MEIZif Jon W. oloski Principal JJM:JWK:pb Document ID: P:\finals\2202014Report.DOC I ' • I ' I ' G c o E n g i n e e r s 14 File No.2202-014-00-1130/0060598 o Y n u .0 101 1 ----1 X 1. s 1/4 cofi .„ A I�' LIT w Of SEC JO ..z NOR UNE SECAON J1 L5 Ci LOT G eV 1/4 COR�1ti L OF SEC 31 (. O 10 a • v 4 iz LOT fEIRCE:i�.� u 11 0Tp LOT s PROJECT SITE / LOT 10 T . - / Li 1 k, 8 1 I I 8 C. i ZZ I L.` LOT 1 YI L e- ~<� y o3v C`j o - 0� LOT r0 r o coy 10 LOT ' C I LOT 10 L E. Al 3 SOUTH 4:RD STREET N VICINITY MAP (NTS) —, VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER r NORTH CAMPUS FACILITIES la q NOT TO SCALE 1 4 e re Reference: Drawing entitled 'Co-generation Facility,Valley Medical q Center,' by Touma Engineers,dated 01/10/96. . Ali VICINITY MAP Geo��Engineers FIGURE 1 B-1 GENERATOR �B-4 AREA tt4*,1 1 iiii I I I I I I.Eill I I I 1111*-1 I IIII I I''''' 40/00/4- B-3c CO EXISTING ` B-3b () WAREHOUSE B-3a Z. + oir B-2 T N e e Ni EXPLANATION: e B-1+ BORING 0 40 80 SCALE IN FEET Flu' SITE PLAN Geo �Engineers FIGURE 2 APPENDIX A APPENDIX A . FIELD EXPLORATIONS AND LABORATORY TESTING FIELD EXPLORATIONS We explored subsurface soil and groundwater conditions at the site by drilling 6 borings to depths of about 6.5 to 21.5 feet below the existing ground surface. Gregory Drilling of Redmond, Washington drilled two borings (B-1 and B-2) on April 8, 1998 using truck-mounted hollow-stem auger drilling equipment. CN Drilling of Seattle, Washington drilled four borings (B-3a, B-3b, B-3c and B-4) on April 8, 1998 using portable solid flight auger drilling equipment to allow access to landscaped portions of the site. Locations of the explorations were determined in the field by measuring distances from existing site features. Ground surface elevations shown on the exploration logs are based on topographic information contained in previous reports provided to us for this study (see Site Description section of this report for listing of previous reports). The locations of the explorations are shown on the Site Plan, Figure 2. The explorations were continuously monitored by a representative from our firm who visually examined and classified the soils encountered, obtained representative soil samples, observed ground water conditions, and prepared a detailed log of each exploration. A 2.4-inch inside- diameter, heavy-duty split-barrel sampler with brass liner rings was used to obtain relatively undisturbed samples from the borings (B-1 and B-2) completed by Gregory Drilling. The blow counts resulting from driving this sampler with a 300-pound hammer falling 30 inches area roughly equivalent to those from the Standard Penetration Test. A 1.5 inch inside-diameter standard split spoon sampler was used to obtain disturbed samples form borings(B-3a, B-3b, B-3c and B-4) completed by CN Drilling. The number of blows required to drive the samplers the last 12 inches, or other indicated distance, is recorded on the boring logs. Soils encountered were visually classified in general accordance with the classification system described in Figure A-1. A key to the boring log symbols is presented in Figure A-2. The boring logs are presented in Figures A-3 through A-8. The logs are based on our interpretation of the field data and indicate the various types of soils encountered. They also indicate the depths at which the soils or their characteristics change, although the change might actually be gradual. The densities noted on the boring logs are based on the blow counts. The borings were backfilled in general accordance with local regulatory requirement. LABORATORY TESTING Selected soil samples obtained from the test pits were returned to our lab and visually examined to confirm or modify field classifications. Selected soil samples were tested to determine their natural moisture content and dry density. The results of the moisture content and density determinations are presented on the boring logs. G e o E n g i n e e r s A-1 File No. 2202-014-00-1130/060598 SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM GROUP MAJOR DIVISIONS SYMBOL GROUP NAME GRAVEL CLEAN GRAVEL GW WELL-GRADED GRAVEL,FINE TO COARSE GRAVEL COARSE • GRAINED GP POORLY-GRADED GRAVEL SOILS More Than 50% of Coarse Fraction GRAVEL GM SILTY GRAVEL Retained WITH FINES on No.4 Sieve GC CLAYEY GRAVEL More Than 50% Retained on SAND CLEAN SAND SW WELL-GRADED SAND,FINE TO COARSE SAND No. 200 Sieve SP POORLY-GRADED SAND More Than 50% of Coarse Fraction SAND SM SILTY SAND Passes WITH FINES • No.4 Sieve SC CLAYEY SAND FINE SILT AND CLAY ML SILT GRAINED INORGANIC SOILS CL CLAY Uquid Limit Less Than 50 ORGANIC OL ORGANIC SILT,ORGANIC CLAY More Than 50% SILT AND CLAY MH SILT OF HIGH PLASTICITY,ELASTIC SILT Passes INORGANIC • No.200 Sieve CH CLAY OF HIGH PLASTICITY,FAT CLAY Uquid Umit 50 or More ORGANIC OH ORGANIC CLAY,ORGANIC SILT HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS PT PEAT NOTES: SOIL MOISTURE MODIFIERS: 1. Field classification is based on visual examination of soil Dry- Absence of moisture,dusty,dry to the touch in general accordance with ASTM D2488-90. Moist- Damp,but no visible water 2. Soil classification using laboratory tests is based on ASTM D2487-90. Wet- Visible free water or saturated, usually soil is obtained from below water table 3. Descriptions of soil density or consistency are based on interpretation of blow count data, visual appearance of soils,and/or test data. �� SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM Geo Engineers 41k1i/ FIGURE A-1 LABORATORY TESTS SOIL GRAPH: AL Atterberg Limits CP Compaction SM Soil Group Symbol CS Consolidation (See Note 2) DS Direct shear GS Grain size Distinct Contact %F Percent fines Between HA Hydrometer Analysis Soil Strata SK Permeability SM Moisture Content Gradual or Approximate MD Moisture and density / Location of SP Swelling pressure Change TX Triaxial compression Between Soil UC Unconfined compression Strata CA Chemical analysis Water Level BLOW COUNT/SAMPLE DATA: Blows required to drive a 2.4-inch I.D. Bottom of Boring split-barrel sampler 12 inches or other indicated distances using a 22 111 Location of relatively 300-pound hammer falling 30 inches. undisturbed sample •. 12 ® Location of disturbed sample Blows required to drive a 1.5-inch I.D. Location of sampling attempt (SPT)split-barrel sampler 12 inches 1 7 ® with no recovery or other indicated distances using a 140-pound hammer falling 30 inches. 10 0 Location of sample obtained in general accordance with Standard Penetration Test (ASTM D-1586) procedures "P"indicates sampler pushed with 26 [1] Location of SPT sampling weight of hammer or against weight attempt with no recovery of drill rig. Location of grab sample NOTES: 1. The reader must refer to the discussion in the report text,the Key to Boring Log Symbols and the exploration logs for a proper understanding of subsurface conditions. 2. Soil classification system is summarized in Figure A-1. 4/12) KEY TO BORING LOG SYMBOLS Geo�"Engineers FIGURE A-2 TEST DATA BORING B-1 • Moisture Dry DESCRIPTION Content Density Blow .Group Surface Elevation(ft.): 52.0 0 Lab Tests (%) (pcf) Count Samples' Symbol 0 0 0(GM Silty fine to coarse gravel with sand(fill) —0 3 Q 8 0 C 0 - 0 0 0 3 C:3 —1 5— 0 ,O( _ MD 14 123 CJ C 2 - SM Brownish gray silty fine sand with occasional gravel(very dense) - (wet)(fill) —2 SM Gray silty fine to medium sand with gravel(very dense,moist) (glacial till) - 10— MD 9 122 —3 50/6" ■ _ ML Gray silt with fine sand and occasional gravel(very stiff;moist) —4 15— 27 tit _5 co w e "- - w z - f- - w - z 0 20— _g 27 � - w _ p Boring completed at 21.5 feet on 04/08/98 Ground water encountered at about 5.0 feet during drilling - -7 25— - —8 co rn _ 30— —9 —10 35— - —11 v S 40— —12 Note:See Figuro A 2 for explanation of symbols ', 1� LOG OF BORING Geo Engineers �/l FIGURE A-3 TEST DATA BORING B-2 DESCRIPTION Moisture Dry Content Density Blow Group Surface Elevation(ft.): 57.0 Lab Tests (%) (pot) Count Samples Symbol 0 r ��ASPHALT 3 inches of asphalt —0 :SM/ML 2 inches crushed rock - Light brown silty fine sand with occasional gravel to fine sandy silt • : (loose to medium dense/medium stiff to stif moist)(fill) —1 5— _ MD 27 100 9 ■::: : : —2 10— —3 MD 16 119 13 ■. ' ML Gray silt with fine sand and occasional fine gravel(very stiff to - V hard,moist to wet) - -4 15— _ MD 21 106 31 ■ - w —5 w_ - w - u H z - w = - w 20— —6 .. 41 ■ w 0 Boring completed at 21.5 feet on 04/08/98 - Ground water encountered at about 12.0 feet during drilling —7 25— - —8 co =9 co 30— _ —10 35— -11 • Q _ —12 40— `ry Note:See Figure A 2 for explanation of symbols LOG OF BORING Geo �En 'veers 4k11 FIGURE A-4 TEST DATA BORING B-3A DESCRIPTION Moisture Dry Content Density Blow Group Surface Elevation(ft.): 64.0 Lab,Tests (%) (pcf) Count Samples Symbol 0 SM Brown silty fine to coarse sand with fine gravel(SM)(loose,moist) 0 9 ' - -1 SM Brown silty fine to coarse sand with fine to coarse gravel(dense, - 5— moist) _ 50/6" - Boring completed at 6.5 feet on 04/08/98 due to practical refusal —2 No ground water encountered during drilling 10— —3 —4 15— _ w —5 co • - - w Z - tit t- - - Z p 20— —s _ o_ w - o —7 25— —8 0o - rn `v 9 (0 30— _ m _ —10 35— - —11 v —12 40— N Note:Soo Figure A42 for explanation of symbols �1�. LOG OF BORING Geo Engineers �\/ FIGURE A-5 TEST DATA BORING B-3B DESCRIPTION Moisture Dry Content Density Blow Group Surface Elevation(ft.): 64.0 0—Lab Tests (%) (pct) Count Samples S bol • •,•; SW-SM Brown fine to coarse sand with silt and with fine to coarse gravel —0 • • (medium dense to dense,moist) - -1 5- •. .'o 65 ' • •A�• Boring completed at 6.5 feet on 04/08/98 due to practical refusal —2 No ground water encountered during drilling 10— —3 —4 15— - 5- co w - - w f- z - t- p 20— —6 _ n. w - - o —7 25— - —- 8 CO 30 —9 — 73. m _ —10 35— -11 —12 s 40— `ry' Note:See Figure A 2 for explanation of symbols � LOG OF BORING Geo l�Engineers FIGURE A-6 b TEST DATA BORING B-3C DESCRIPTION Moisture Dry Content Density Blow Group Surface Elevation(ft.): 64.0 Lab Tests ,(%) (pcf) Count Samples Symbol 0 r ;SW Brown fine to coarse sand with a trace of silt and with fine to coarse `0 gravel(medium dense to dense,moist) —1 5— 62 Boring completed at 6.5 feet on 04/08/98 due to practical refusal —2 No ground water encountered during drilling 10— —3 —4 15— - w _5 co - u_ to z = a w —6 f 20— = - _ a w a —7 25- - —8 co rn —9 co 30— - m -10 35— -11 Q _ —12 40— 0 N Note:See Figure A 2 for explanation of symbols In' LOG OF BORING Geo Engineers 4 % s FIGURE A-7 4 ''. P TEST DATA BORING B-4 DESCRIPTION Moisture Dry Content Density Blow Group Surface Elevation(ft.): 56.0 Lab Tests (%) (pct) Count Samples Srnbol 0 SM Gray silty fine to medium sand(loose,moist) r'0 SM 13 7 I - ii/ -1 ML Gray silt with fine to medium sand and gravel(stiff moist) - 5— SM 29 22 ' - —2 SM 16 14 I - 10— :: SM Brown silty fine to coarse sand with a trace of organic matter(coal) —3 SM 16 21 I (medium dense,moist) - 16 I -4 SM Gray silty fine to coarse sand(dense,moist)(glacial till) _ 15 SM 18 50/6" U - I— —5 w - - w w F- -z - - M Boring completed at 18.5 feet on 04/08/98 - z w No ground water encountered during drilling _6 H 0 20— - n- w - o - —7 25— - —8 00 - rn c -9 m 30— - - -10 35— ' - —11 c —12 N 40— O N `i Note:See Figure A 2 for explanation of symbols fiV LOG OF BORING Geo oEngineers FIGURE A-8 **************************************************************** City of Renton WA Reprinted: 08/20/98 14 :42 Receipt **************************************************************** Receipt Number: R9805118 Amount: 2 . 88 08/20/98 14 :42 Payment Method: CASH Notation: SUSAN FORE/MAHLU Init: LN Project #: LUA98-129 Type: LUA Land Use Actions Parcel No: 885767-0010 Site Address: 400 S 43RD ST Total Fees : 1, 502 . 88 This Payment 2 . 88 Total ALL Pmts : 1, 502 . 88 Balance: . 00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 000 . 05 .519 . 901.42 . 1 Postage 2 . 88 l . ***************'************************************************* City of Renton WA Reprinted: 08/20/98 14 :41 Receipt ***************;************************************************* Receipt Number: R9805117 Amount: 1, 500 . 00 08/20/98 14 :41 Payment Method: CHECK Notation: #8060 MAHLUM Init: LN Project #: LUA98-129 Type: LUA Land Use Actions Parcel No: 885767-0010 Site Addresjs : 400 S 43RD ST Total Fees : 1, 500 . 00 This Payment ', 1, 500 . 00 Total ALL Pmts: 1, 500 . 00 Balance: . 00 ***************r************************************************* Account Code Description Amount 000 . 345 . 81 . 00,. 0007 Environmental Review 500 . 00 000 . 345 . 81 . 00',. 0017 Site Plan Approval 1, 000 . 00