Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA98-139 • Rs*la m ROJSAC'R STANDING SEAM 8'HORIZONTAL SIDING METAL ROOF 4'HORIZONTAL SIDING ' • IMITATION BOARD 6 BATT SIDING BOARD 4 BATE SIDI STANDING SEAM DECORATIVE LAMP CLERESTORY WINDOWS CLEAR GLASS METAL ROOF REMOVE EXISTING CLERESTORY WINDOWS — /DRIVE-THRU CANOPY --- 1 _- sio:—.—i111iI1111iGo;11111;EY :11i1111111, m,NoutI11 im.--i■I11111111: 111111111:i;:i1111 1 1 p „ p U .11ni11111111111111"11II'llllllIIIIIIIIIIIII'lll `' Il ' 'I I ;I :1 I I II II I� : II 1 I 1 I 11 'I I .I 1I 1 I I I I - 1 Y' .I dF i I e. �r� W _= h, I'II r ra■r Iv = III ra■1� T v '• Abaft! w ,: �.���Jw-- ��'- —V9,�!� ' WEATHERED PEALED POLES/ Y W/ROPE WRAPPING < V EAST ELEVATION u SCALE- 1/4"e 1'-0" ,... STANDING SEAM STANDING SEAM VCJE METAL ROOF METAL ROOF BOARD 4 BATT SIDING 4"HORIZONTAL SIDING IMITATION • CLERESTORY WINDOWS DECORATIVE LAMP CLEAR GLASS Nl / CLERESTORY WINDOWS 11111111111111I l,-.,I 1!I!4l�M�JEr��aE!4l yl�P• Cam!'! --Intl/�_11�':i 11111� ���l����l�nt���n����1Qp..=n mi-_ ROUGH-CUT 1 1 III 1 I_ I �r� �I ' ' 1 1 S: 11 1_I B'HORIZONTAL SIDING •?11r1■1■■11= I I' I, it ! i • zz `I' , II=ic11111■11= • ,q d h • a C ry - ' MI I YI 1" I II ry_ _• ,,q.11r..... 51,\ . ROUGH-CUT QUW WEATHERED PEALED POLES W/ROPE WRRAPPIN6 0'HORIZONTAL SIDING 03 lil sr, NORTH ELEVATION zO q ##1 - - SCALE: I/0'= -0' Y I• - Q d Y W Yi w 1 • Data. 8-21-40 Project, K070 FILE, 552052 Pram. .NK A2 • • • ROUGH-GUT S'HORIZONTAL SIDING STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF IMITATION BOARD a BATT SIDING DECORATIVE LAMP CLERESTORY WINDOWS . 1 I1 _ y • I_ III _I_ 11-1 IIWIlT-11911fl -1 i_ Y 9 1 " I' z 9 ,I \\ ,I III II ' 1 it it II L d u t 11I I 1, j o_ i- -_ �i / N• ry Z O W• ' I EA.THERED PEALED POLES L W A/ROPE WRAPPING Q SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: I/5"=I'-O" ROUGH-GUT IL -O 4'HORIZONTAL SIDING 5'HORIZONTAL SIDING STANDING SEAM BOARD a BATT SIDING METAL ROOF DECORATIVE LAMP STANDING SEAM IMITATION BOARD It BATT SIDING METAL ROOF( CLEAR GLASS CLERESTORY WINDOWS CLERESTORY WINDOWS REMOVE EXISTING DRIVE-THRU CANOPY ■_�� 1 III�I��l�I'_I I1���_� IIIII�IiI.�.��_ w if IlI1 dill ` ICI ) . • n� ® __ ._I.��� - ■._I � � , . Q U Q LJ co in in WEATHERED PEALED POLES Z - IN/ROPE WRAPPING WEST ELEVATION p 9� SCALE I/8'=I'-0' - - - - - j Q �.�-— _ 1-1-1 • w $ E Date• 8-2Ii8 Protect' KB20 FILE: 10870A8 Dann• ,14K AS • Rens12a, y °y in _I3 ' 't. Ificres q,+]�►• !..\ � 18 A• s l '0; 32' I Gor40.?2 4 �/ft✓/✓{/'ie s•anse weeuu.� �:'._` ���--�� „ 1 r .• n �' 77, v 1'4' P .o •1..ia.1f.:""{{///�'" �''� '\j`adau,'l�c�W^�..•` .+� I.' 4"1 s ZE El.,11,•. ,w., /� orb "\ \.t..,:` 'a c?j ' 45,.,B� . A s,) t -p'" ° c.R I," \ V ` ` o 44, ate`' �._.,t,f �Q•�rN s �•qr r yS.., iN ,,.,!�."E� •8s R'�i •5 D_t T • 9a - - L .,,\\ �c;_ In . CAI t Eu E�. y ti e.c, .a�- aa..' �o \\ '� t,Y:. p q� PENT• SNOiE ) e1 n ry J ~„ � r a _-won 9 � I .{ „ 17g§ s . Lot I e q 39.85 Acres + - E "• ' Q —.• Aiib p ow MOOS W. R: srra J1^5 i d1 �1I1 11I1 -Jj, N�IaN NORI IL 7,,,,,,,71 A 5 : (2) ..A::::::',, fi',':''':'..:.11......''' iii . . • «, , —ems 'I-0pwP SAY �� �5u�aggig' j 'i, o `s«='.lxl•I"-VI 4i •v,�' S • - sl...nis `V • /T i[!1\�', �r Je:N. \ J_ Q m K NOD RTAI L- MAP ' : 1"t o 5 M Date. 9-448 RoJect, Kb20 FILE. KB2OAK Drawn. JAK RM6WM LEGAL DESCRIPTION 69H0 STREET ADDRESS :05 RI TM ST TAN PARCEL N0. 142.05 4011 Re SOUTH 265 FEET W TK NOR%xo FEET OF no EAST I10 PEEL OF SCNERRwarr LOT I,YC,4JN 15,TONBwT 251oam RNNE 5 EAST. WM-IS SINS COMTr.rwowNSTON LESS STATE w16bNr. - REMOVE EKSTINS LIRE 1 DRIVE ADD NEW LANDWAPIN6 REMOVE EXISTNS CURB 1 LANDSCAPINS / ADD NEW ORB 1 PATCH DRIVE AS MIS EXISTING FIR TREES Z S E%STN6 PARKINS PREP.ISO 2650. LOT LISKTIN6 N 114 atileilltialltiallta •'TALL',- gX20' 1 ` LLI J ie•••�9' O'STA S �� X31J'STALLS I� W p .. EXISnNS -a ExtSnN5 FIR TREE I El_ A 1/�/' J EXIST 11511 RESTING Q_} --'' EXIISSTINS CI3 VC MAT 1'� INTERCEPTOR CS 53 PARKINS STALLSTz , •e _-'_'i•T 3 (I\ 9'.0'STALLS 1 '1 EASTINS FIR TREES �•2 L - __ _ O r� � Bir ram• J I W Rd I NFW 1REE Q N �I 11v ..__. NS Tnr a.�l' (ERITANLI Q W I 1 1 4540 SF -a se :*: �' EXISTING s�� "`I ) ~ RESTAURANT 11 '--0 q''O'SRAL.S I t - BUILDING " : Kq I It IT f NEW CANOPY AEOV' S I q'X33'STALLS 1 0 N/c RAMP-112 SLOPE / 1 yEA,,FER VESTI&1 di I y4� 7 2'LEAS W MIS a I. o I* J 9):20 STALLS ((� 1 I�u91' �i A , �� g•l 44 I I REMOVE EXISTING DANt.t'/ ///���/\\\ f Q. •. T�..�/•.r A' v— - 1 W ) r, 1 5LAPI uov 5• ��-- LANDSLFPIN6 A -- - __--- �� L iEXIST. K / . PROP.LIRE 365DI' EX15nN6 •••M& S P '� \MOM 5516N Z ALM TREE .. LOT LI6IRING REMOVE EXST11.45 DRIVE • • _ REPAIR SIDEWALK 1 CORN HARDIE AVENUE S.W. — `\TYPICAL LnNDscAPINE— — — — — — 01251 N6 TEES TO REMAS II EXISTING PALM TREE TO REM.IN F— EXISTING LANDSCAPING TO REMAIN NEW DECORATIVE GRASSES ' 606 LAA9 APE 00905RS • Z j K X d PROJECT RECAP PARKING RECAP U-I K 1 SITE AREA•E1,150 SF PAWNS REWIRED e I PER ISO SF W m WILDING AREA•4b40 SF PARKINS REWIRED.4640 5F/100•46 STALLS _ LOT COVERAGE•11b9d PARKINS PROVIDED:52 51D.STALLS LAN SSCAPE AREA•bb20 SF MANDLAP STALLS•2 STALLS V SITE PLAN CB NORTH Z SCALE: I"=2a-0" J z A Q F �ffi D d.. R-4-0B Project, KBp - FILE. KB20b Ormm, -LAIC AU • . . • . . _ , 1 • SECTION 19,TOWNSHIP 23 N,RANGE E.W .tIES, PETIT • REMOVE oasn ADD 1.151LASIESCAFINE i 1.1" . we CURB I LASERS/PM ADD PEW DIES I PATCH ORME AS REOD• - 7„......ERSE.MR IRE. • / T.:rri.O11. P.P.LINE 26501' ilft•..•_11A.12,allit. • r---------_—_ ---_-_R.-U1.,- rip tip----- ----------------—1 , LARY•SAIRS5 !Ell) 1 • LANDECAPINE -.,_71.114E PARC.\.r1s0V1N15 I . I I 21,1' `1111 ) 1 .•99 1 • el •1' § 101P45" i 1 't 1,1 p iLAttP-XAPIN5 / ...._11,•• • 1 I 1'-E 14. ..,- wraoIR s. F N- ..., •101F, r 40. EASTINO 4) OI.WSTER V. ERSTIN6 51,...,, m...^. DOS,. SICRIn paw. Era. ,,r,,,ta... TWO WAY I —••• co 0 N' 111,1 7 Nt , .,...-"",,, .,INTERCEPTOR •ASAc'' 52 FMCS*STALIS 1 1 2 1,-71cl --Pip. , ,,, • -,..!: Z&dat), '11 w 1 W.,'1. • ERST1NO FIR TREF. . 1 I ,------,. 1 1 1 .1.,.ip' ile-N .1. 0 m !I 1 ef 1 1....1 , 1 . , i , ;,, -- s uji- 1 ' 2 I ,,,-/L Tx,„ .,. v .., , 2 Pitt 4540 SF EXISTING 1 . .. 2 , E ID , 0 It RESTAURA ;NT 0 -4 * ' . BUILDING i ..., NEW CANDP(ABOVE ' lj 1 luji11:02.k,LI 414 I .....,.. _ I FLZ, 12.LONE W RAILS me-,••• E.s, •sp,-1A••• c.e. _1 e•-• ..1,—— I - ri _ I . RESOVE ERSTIRE CAR.•r 11_ 3 I \ 2R LLAPOSCAPINE .1.,1ap 1 ' 3•5111 ,I .SN LAR115CAPNE --7--- ---------ff-- ---- '47---------SK..--4t-__r______7_ y g .., I A., \_ t„,,,,A,,,rsz_____yrzmg1.4 'IV N.V. meop.LINE 26501' 1 ' 1 ‘).-r. --Rs LOT LIONTINS 2 . T - _... -,c..4 REMOVE EXIST1NS ORA. ---------••••11----_ RERNIR I ORB HARDIE AVENUE51,47 „ _ . - -—- _ rn c• • r V:... A- C 2 ,,,,--.A . ....„...t ----.---------I__ c...s, N .-. AKA:S1.4.8 e. E 2 C..) ^ LA , IMPERVIOUS SURFACE . k. u . a NO INNS IAICREA.E.. NA InAPCON lows sa.MGAC-e.. . NOTE-, C.b . 0 NO EP TIJAL UTILITIES No PROPOID ,_CO o PAR EXISTINIG APP•1•10.1.7. K,Ate,Awsis lawle•••is• CI •••.1. CB NORTH •:11.-.-. SCALE: I".20-0" WILE-REANMA, AT COMAE., ELENA-no Als. LEA-DESCRIPTION n•-.. . STREET AMR]. ION 514 TN ST. TAX PANG.. KUN.PACK1 Ud.... "4 ITS SDIMI 265 EST oF TIE FORTH SOO FEET OP lie EAST TO EST - OP 60VERNHaa LOT I...ow:MIR TOVASNIN 23 Want RAN.5 EAST. - NIA,IN KM UNRITY,HANNINSTON.I.I.6 STATE H16191AT. ' DATA 9/98 - - - - — -- - -- - SGLE I.•201 . ORM St ....-1- . . , • 0 p CITY OF RENTON �, �_ , ; A..�- ' -= -- Planning/Building/Public Works `��--- 0 0610 5'0 0 - ''k 1055 South GradyWayRenton Washington 98055 40 -c' �'_ .=Y.. - g , 0 ti r i ti ' 'ran -�- _ E ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED 4 _•.,..•-• - - ' 4OA G S @STAG 4.__ V 191— I c7 /`,,"' RA Ma- , c. \s. PO Box 53 Renton 98055 i2�' IWDRL SvD C',«' �tt - '3y vl v. n 1nS�Tipm-d�/_�1Ma/\C1 A D DRFS. D UNABLE TO 0'�rARD* I:t4Pr-'.:TO FORWARD --ems; J. EntV3 1 RETUFN Ti SEr1Dt:R _ .m� _ 1 faltu :Zi s .i-t`` 111iitt!Iiii !Ei ii i:?: ieii it!! it!! a CIT. OF RENTON /� :pry Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator October 12, 2000 Paul Loots Restaurant Space Design, Inc. 15935 NE 8th Street, Suite B101 Bellevue,WA 98008 SUBJECT: Expiration of City of Renton Land Use Application Project No. LUA-98-139, SA-A, ECF/Jack `n Jo's Beach Bar& Grill Dear Mr. Loots: Pursuant to RMC section 4-9-200.K.1, a single two-year extension has been granted for the above referenced land use decision. A new expiration date of October 12, 2002 has been assigned to the project. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at (425)430-7270. Sincerely, Lesley Nishatk/b a Project Manager cc: Billy McHale's Corporation RA Mac, Inc. 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, Washington 98055 r CITY)OF RENTON .da Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor GreggZimmerman P.E.,Administrator October 5, 2000 Billy McHale's Corporation 651 Strander Blvd. #B208 Tukwila,WA 98188 SUBJECT: Expiration of City of Renton Land Use Application Project No. LUA-98-139,SA-A,ECF/Jack'n Jo's Beach Bar&Grill Gentlemen: This letter is being sent as a courtesy to advise you of the expiration date for the above referenced land use application. The expiration date is October 12, 2000. However, it may be possible to obtain an extension if you request this prior to the expiration date. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at(425)430-7270. Sincerely, Lesley Nish' ' a Project Manager cc: RA Mac, Inc/Owners e pirPcd (int 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, Washington 98055 m f 'CITX __JF RENTON N ON ..IL `t Planning/Building/Public Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator 7esse Tanner,Mayor• j .. October 29, 1998 I , • • Mr.John Wojtacha Restaurant Space Design • 15935 NE 8th Street, B101 . . Bellevue,!WA 98008 • • SUBJECT: Jack n'Jo's Beach Bar&Grill ' • Project No. LUA-98-139,SA-A,ECF „ • ., • Dear Mr.Wojtacha This letter is to inform you that the comment:and appeal periods.have;;ended for the Environmental Review Committee's(ERC),Determination of Non=Significance for the above-referenced project. No appeals were filed on the ERC determination.' This decision is final and application for the appropriately required permits may proceed. If you have any questions, please'feel free to contact me at(425)430-7270. For the Environmental Review Committee,` , • Lesley Nishihira Project Manager , . • cc: R.A.M.A.C./Owners Bill McHales Corporation/Applicant • • • FINAL.DOC • ' = ; 200;N hiii Avenue:South-Renton,Washington 98055 4iJ This naoer contains 50%recycled material.20%oust consumer. 7 CIT' OF RENTON ..� Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor' Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator October 19, 1998 • Billy McHales Corporation do John Hoehl. 651 Strander Blvd.,#B208 Tukwila,WA 98188 SUBJECT: JACK`N.JO'S BEACH BAR 7 GRILL,-.REQUEST FOR PARKING MODIFICATION • Dear Mr. Hoehl:' On behalf of the applicant, Billy:McHales Corporation, you have:requested to deviate:from the City's Parking and Loading Ordinance. The request is to exceed the maximum number of parking stalls permitted for the site. The applicant would, like to provide 52 parking spaces-6 over the . • ;: maximum number allowed for a restaurant of:this"size::.-.;The applicant has made a request to • deviate from the"Parking and Loading Ordinance in the project:narrative included with the project ;.; - application: . Section;4-14-1:C.1a: allows`the.Administrator to grant modifcations.from the parking standards • for individual cases provided that the modification meets the followingcriteria: 11.) conforms to the intent_and purpose'of the Code; 2.) can be shown to be justifed`and required for the use and situation intended; !3.) will not create adverse impacts to other properties in the vicinity; and,. • 4.) will be made prior to detailed engineering and design: Background. .. : The subject project includes a proposal to perform tenant improvements to an existing building, 'a_ _;. former Burger King fast food restaurant, and create a dine-in restaurant called Jack'n Jo's Beach Bar & Grill. The proposal includes the addition of a vestibule to add a weather protected: entryway, additional:landscaping, elihiination of the drive through window, as well as•the modification of the parking.layout. The drive-through aisle formerly used by the Burger•King fast , food restaurant will not be utilized by the proposed dine-in restaurant. ..Rather, the.applicant is. proposing to make use of the area by placing additional parking stalls in this drive-through area. The spaces will meet the required lengths and widths for parallel stalls and the aisle will maintain , its one-way circulation pattern at an appropriate width of 10 feet for one-way traffic with an exit : onto Hardie Avenue SW. . The Parking and Loading Ordinance specifies a requirement of 1 parking space per 100 square feet of floor area dedicated to restaurant use. The proposed restaurant is 4,640 square feet in size—requiring a total of 46 spaces for the site. Section 4-148 of the Code states that "in determining parking requirements, when a single number of parking.spaces is required by this Code, then that number of spaces is to be interpreted as the general number of parking spaces required, representing both the minimum and the maximum number'of spaces to be provided for that land use." - . Document2 200 Mill Avenue South- Renton,Washington 98055 1 :: This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer Page 2 October 19; .1998 • On October 8, 1998, the project received Administrative Site Plan Approval subject to conditions.. ,." The decision requires as a Condition of Approval that "The applicant shall successfully obtain a modification 'from the parking standards from the Administrator of the.Planning/Building/Public, Works Department...lf the modification is.denied, the applicant shall submit a revised site plan . showing a maximum of:46 parking stalls as required per code. The revised site plan is subject'to . the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of building permits.!" The site plan submitted with the project application shows a width of 9 feet for the parallel:stalls proposed in the former drive-through aisle lane and only provides two ADA accessible stalls: • where three are required. If the modification request for additional'parking spaces is'approved, , the sitelplan-will need to be revised in order to provide a width of 10 feet as required per code,for' parallel'stalls in addition to a third ADA parking stall. These revisions are required.as`.a;Condition of'Approval in.the Administrative Site Plan report. • Analysis , 1:) 'Conforms to the intent and purpose of the Code. WithoUti the additional parking spaces in the drive-through aisle, the site will meet the required ` number,of parking spaces specified in the code for restaurant. However, the.punter specified in the code is a singular number-'-a range is not provided: (For example, office uses are allowed a , :,,minimum and a maximum,number:of parking spaces-per,code. Such a range allows specific office uses to.provide the appropriate,number of spaces within that range to accommodate.the needs of that use) :The site will provide the minimum parking required for-the use,, but is not allowedi to exceed this number a modification to the code. The applicant contends that the change.of use from a fast-food restaurant to a sit down"restaurant will generate more visitors with;a longer average visit time--therefore,: additional :spaces :are. • needed;to accommodate this;use on the site. The proposed use, as a 'sit down restaurant, will actually generate a need for more parking on the site than.'a fast food restaurant with,a drive through window. Based on:the ITE Parking Generation Manual, a quality restaurant has an average-parking generation rate:of'12:49. A fast food restaurant with a drive through window generates a parking rate of 9.95. Sy providing additional,spaces, the applicant is addressing the , intent and purpose of the parking ordinance-,to provide sufficient parking for the use of the site. 2.) . ' !Can be shown to be justified and required for the use•and situation intended. The applicant would like to utilize the space previously dedicated to the drive-through aisle: ,There , is no other potential use for this portion of the site other than,as additional landscaping. The. addition of the requested parking spaces will not add any new impervious surface to the site and will not create any impacts to traffic flow or circulation. 3.) !Will not create adverse impacts to other properties in the vicinity. There will be no adverse impact to surrounding properties by creating additional parking stalls on the south side of the site. The site is currently landscaped along the southern'boundary of the property. 4.) !Will be made prior to detailed engineering and design. The applicant ltas requested the parking modification with the application submittal for site plan review. This stage of design development is prior to preparation of detailed engineering plans for Page.3.i . October.19,.1998 the site Any improvements to the parking area will be made after the appropriate permits have been obtained and detailed engineering and design review has been conducted. Decision: The request to deviate from the City's Parking and Loading Ordinance by exceeding the maximum number of parking stalls permitted.for the site of the proposed. Jack 'n Jo's Beach Bar &:Grill, located'at 105 SW 7th Street by providing 52 parking spaces (6 over the maximum allowed by Ordinance) is hereby approved. • Sincerely, • 'Gregg Zimmerman,Administrator Planning/Building/Public Works Department • cc• °Jana Hiiertei i Leslie Nishihira • • • • • i CONCURRENCE DATE /®/l to/ Q' NAME ATE 2 Hu /jf G:�rsi _ e0 7 ? CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: October 16, 1998 TO: Gregg Zimmerman FROM: 1, Lesley Nishihira V SUBJECT: Jack`n Jo's Beach Bar&Grill—Request for Parking Modification. Summartof Request The applicant, Billy McHales Corporation, has requested to deviate from the City's Parking and Loading Ordinance. The request is to exceed the maximum number of parking stalls permitted for the site. The applicant would like to provide 52 parking spaces--6 over the maximum number allowed for a restaurant of this size. The applicant has made a request to deviate from the Parking and Loading Ordinance in the project narrative included with the project application. Section 4-14-1.C.1 a. allows the Administrator to grant modifications from the parking standards for individual cases provided that the modification meets the following criteria: 1.) conforms to the intent and purpose of the Code; 2.) can be shown to be justified and required for the use and situation intended; 3.) will not create adverse impacts to other properties in the vicinity; and, 4.) will be made prior to detailed engineering and design. Background The subject project includes a proposal to perform tenant improvements to an existing building, a former Bulger King fast food restaurant, and create a dine-in restaurant called Jack`n Jo's Beach Bar&Grill. The proposal includes the addition of a vestibule to add a weather protected entryway, additional landscaping, elimination of the drive through window, as well as the modification of the parking layout. The drive-through aisle formerly used by the Burger King fast food restaurant will not be utilized by the proposed dine-in restaurant. Rather,the applicant is proposing to make use of the area by placing additional parking stalls in this drive-through area. The spaces will meet the required lengths and widths for parallel stalls and the aisle will maintain its one-way circulation pattern at an appropriate width of 10 feet for one-way traffic with an exit onto Hardie Avenue SW. The Parking and Loading Ordinance specifies a requirement of 1 parking space per 100 square feet of floor area dedicated to restaurant use. The proposed restaurant is 4,640 square feet in size-- requiring a total of 46 spaces for the site. Section 4-14-8 of the Code states that"in determining parking requirements, when a single number of parking spaces is required by this Code,then that number of;spaces is to be interpreted as the general number of parking spaces required, \\TS SERVER\SYS2\COMMON\H:\DIVISION.S\DEVELOP.SER\DEV&PLAN.ING\PROJECTS\98-139.JTH\PARKMOD.DOC CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: ! October 16, 1998 TO: Gregg Zimmerman FROM: Lesley Nishihira` SUBJECT: Jack'n Jo's Beach Bar&Grill—Request for Parking Modification. Summary of Request 1 The applicant, Billy McHales Corporation, has requested to deviate from the City's Parking and Loading Ordinance. The request is to exceed the maximum number of parking stalls permitted for the site. The applicant would like to provide 52 parking spaces--6 over the maximum number allowed for a restaurant of this size. The applicant has made a request to deviate from the Parking and Loading Ordinance in the project narrative included with the project application. Section 4-14-1.C.1 a. allows the Administrator to grant modifications from the parking standards for individual cases provided that the modification meets the following criteria: 1.) conforms to the intent and purpose of the Code; 2.) can be shown to be justified and required for the use and situation intended; 3.) will not create adverse impacts to other properties in the vicinity; and, 4.) will be made prior to detailed engineering and design. Background The subject project includes a proposal to perform tenant improvements to an existing building, a former Burger King fast food restaurant, and create a dine-in restaurant called Jack'n Jo's Beach Bar&Grill. The proposal includes the addition of a vestibule to add a weather protected entryway, additional landscaping, elimination of the drive through window, as well as the modification of the parking layout. The drive-through aisle formerly used by the Burger King fast food restaurant will not be utilized by the proposed dine-in restaurant. Rather, the applicant is proposing to make use of the area by placing additional parking stalls in this drive-through area. The spaces will meet the required lengths and widths for parallel stalls and the aisle will maintain its one-way circulation pattern at an appropriate width of 10 feet for one-way traffic with an exit onto Hardie Avenue SW. The Parking and Loading Ordinance specifies a requirement of 1 parking space per 100 square feet of floor area dedicated to restaurant use. The proposed restaurant is 4,640 square feet in size-- requiring a total of 46 spaces for the site. Section 4-14-8 of the Code states that"in determining parking requirements,when a single number of parking spaces is required by this Code, then that number oflspaces is to be interpreted as the general number of parking spaces required, \\TS SERVER\SYS2\COMMON\H:\DIVISION.S\DEVELOP.SER\DEV&PLAN.ING\PROJECTS\98-139.JTH\PARKMOD.DOC s � representing both the minimum and the maximum number of spaces to be provided for that land use." On October 8, 1998,the project received Administrative Site Plan Approval subject to conditions. The decision requires as a Condition of Approval that: "The applicant shall successfully obtain a modification from the parking standards from the Administrator of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department...lf the modification is denied, the applicant shall submit a revised site plan showing a maximum of 46 parking stalls as required per code. The revised site plan is subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of building permits." The site plan submitted with the project application shows a width of 9 feet for the parallel stalls proposed in the former drive-through aisle lane and only provides two ADA accessible stalls where three are required. If the modification request for additional parking spaces is approved,the site plan will need to be revised in order to provide a width of 10 feet as required per code for parallel stalls in addition to a third ADA parking stall. These revisions are required as a Condition of Approval in the Administrative Site Plan report. Analysis 1.) Conforms to the intent and purpose of the Code. Without the additional parking spaces in the drive-through aisle,the site will meet the required number ofl parking spaces specified in the code for a restaurant. However, the number specified in the code is a singular number--a range is not provided. (For example, office uses are allowed a minimum and a maximum number of parking spaces per code. Such a range allows specific office uses to provide the appropriate number of spaces within that range to accommodate the needs of that use.) The site will provide the minimum parking required for the use, but is not allowed to exceed this number without a modification to the code. The applicaant contends that the change of use from a fast-food restaurant to a sit down restaurant will generate more visitors with a longer average visit time--therefore, additional spaces are needed to accommodate this use on the site. The proposed use, as a sit down restaurant,will actually generate a need for more parking on the site than a fast food restaurant with a drive through window. Based on the ITE Parking Generation Manual, a quality restaurant has an average parking generation; rate of 12.49. A fast food restaurant with a drive through window generates a parking rate of 9.95. By providing additional spaces,the applicant is addressing the intent and purpose of the parking ordinance--to provide sufficient parking for the use of the site. 2.) Can be shown to be justified and required for the use and situation intended. The applicant would like to utilize the space previously dedicated to the drive-through aisle. There is no other potential use for this portion of the site other than as additional landscaping. The addition of'the requested parking spaces will not add any new impervious surface to the site and will not create;any impacts to traffic flow or circulation. 3.) Will not create adverse impacts to other properties in the vicinity. There will be no adverse impact to surrounding properties by creating additional parking stalls on the south side of the site. The site is currently landscaped along the southern boundary of the property. 4.) Will be made prior to detailed engineering and design. The applicant has requested the parking modification with the application submittal for site plan review. This stage of design development is prior to preparation of detailed engineering plans for the site. Any improvements to the parking area will be made after the appropriate permits have been obtained and detailed engineering and design review has been conducted. • QUtITY RESTAURANT (L J) Peak Parking Spaces Occupied vs: 1,000 GROSS SQUARE FEET • LEASABLE AREA ' • On a: WEEKDAY PARKING GENERATION RATES m Average Range of Standard Number of Average 1,000 GSF a Rate Rates Deviation Studies Leasable Area 12.49 j 6.25-25.83 4.91 34 8 C F. • DATA PLOT AND EQUATION CAUTION—USE CAREFULLY—LOW R2. 240 u 0 ❑ 0 220� w 1 . ..• o- 200• ° m U I UO 180 r co 0 160 i 0 0 I 0 (06 140 ❑ z 120 - 0 ❑ cc ❑ - 100 - a i ° ❑ . 80 ; ❑ ° a 1 ° e° ❑ o - II 60 ❑ ❑ 00 , a : ° ❑ ❑ 40 4-. 20 I I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I 1 1 !3 5 7 9 11 , 13 15 ii X = 1000 GROSS SQUARE FEET LEASABLE AREA . ElACTUAL DATA POINTS FITTED CURVE 6. s ` Fitted Curve Equation: P = 15.35(X) — 23.0 E R2.= 0.472el ag ft 0.1 W g i h 11 Parking Generation,August 1987/Institute of Transportation Engineers _4' i 130 ' a m , FAST FOOD RESTAURANT WITH DRIVE-IN WINDOW (836) Peak Parking Spaces Occupied vs: 1,000 GROSS SQUARE FEET LEASABLE AREAii On a: WEEKDAY Nip PARKING GENERATION RATES 00 Average Range of Standard Number of 'Average 1,000 GSF PI Rate 1 Rates Deviation Studies Leasable Area 9.95 3.55-15.92 3.41 18 3 a v i - o DATA PLOT AND EQUATION • ' o r CAUTION—USE CAREFULLY—LOW R2. —.ER 42 - j ❑ w 40 - ' ' , n 38 - O , ❑ . , U 36 - O i ❑ ❑ ❑ ' co 34 - w Q• 32 - u) 30 - z 28 . Q 26 - ❑ ' a 24- I ❑ Y ' w 22 ❑ °- 20 - ❑ ❑ I I , ` a 18 - ❑ ❑ 16 - ❑ ❑ ❑ 14 I 1 1 11 1 1 I I 1 2 3 4 5 6 ml X = 1000 GROSS SQUARE FEET LEASABLE AREA _ 'ACTUAL DATA POINTS FITTED CURVE '. Fitted Curve Equation: P = 1.95(X). + 20.0 j R2 _ 0.038 - t c. v, E 1 �I L hi- Parking Generation,August 1987/Institute of Transportation Engineers 146 t' lie . .....:::...:....... • • On the c1* day of Oc 'ober , 1998, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing t epor*. avvi ViEr ISI.tin documents. This information was sent to: • Name Representing .13;4%1.4 Y+n CtVdkeS Cori 06- \ S6,1f t RV WV AC • • • • • I . • • • (Signature of Sender) Stuuk &k Se can er STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or.have satisfactory evidence that 5� * c�2e. signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for 'fie :uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. �! • Dated: l a !I/ 'v��i �� —, �� Notary Public i and for the State of Washiffgtoh Notary(Print) MARILYN KAMCHEFF My appointment �i "' • r i Project Name:, 304.14_ `h 7jo5 Beath avid grtil Project Number: BUR. le .139 6C.f • I , NOTARY.DOC I 1 1 t City of Renton REPORT Department of Planning/Building/Public Works DECISION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW& ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION DECISION DATE: October 6, 1998 Project Name: Jack n'Jo's Beach Bar& Grill Applicant: 1 Billy McHales Corporation Owner. Dan Shane, R.A.M.A.C. • File Numbe II: LUA-98-139, SA-A, ECF Project ManIlager. Lesley Nishihira Project Description: The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan approval and environmental review for a tenant improvement to an existing building. The interior of the 4,540 square foot building will be remodeled and a 100 square foot entry vestibule will be added to the north side of the building. The applicant is also requesting a modification to the parking ordinance in order to exceed the maximum number of parking spaces allowed for the site. Project Location: 105 SW 7th Street Exist. Bldg. Area SF: 4,540 sf Proposed New Bldg. Area SF: 100 sf _ 5. Site Area: 39,750 sf Total Building Area SF: 4,640 sf "-:it- m;).) t•q,, ••, _ IraT2anal 11 qT Ht ' N \.� "•,� `;, \:•"•,ice�'�� :� .1,44 Q'. 7'1'':H: ,4'11:: IT: 0 0..c ::1:'4,,43*:.4.\:‘--\,-::-,‘—----":"'----H--:-,l' '''''Ili' -.--''"::':.ra.-\'4647 \\7\: -Lw'":""ci' mik 0., A }%. '',/,,,l'-- ? alikita• 40179.21..,._A- .twelf j‘; i ,v. �� i ,• /,.o'."""' �•GaJi Lot I , 1. . Fi El . , " `11` srrE . .. .1 T. -:- -.- 1 - 1- 7-.'9j41. 131P I'::: y y I. . Way y�i7�'k•P�%�a ,� frii, •.. : �k m tia:r.•11,,.., fill Project Location Map SITERCDOC City of Renton PB/PWDepartment Administrative Site Plan Approval&Environmental Review Committee Staff Report JACK`NJO'S BEACH BAR&GRILL LUA-98 139,SA A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF OCTOBER 6,1998 Page 2 of 7 PART ONE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND The applicant, John Hoehl of the Billy McHales Corporation, is requesting Administrative Site Plan approval and environmental review for a tenant improvement to an existing building. The building, formerly a Burger King fast food restaurant, will be occupied by Jack in Jo's Beach Bar&Grill, a casual, fish theme restaurant. The interior of the 4,540 square foot building will be remodeled and the existing drive through window canopy will be removed. A 100 square foot weather vestibule will be added to the north side of the building to serve as the main entrance to the restaurant. The proposal also includes modifications to the exterior facades of the building, additional landscaping to be installed, and a minor reconfiguration of the parking layout. The existing palm tree on site will remain,. As part of this application, the applicant is requesting a modification to the parking ordinance in order to exceed the maximum number of parking spaces allowed for the site. The parking required for a restaurant (at 1 space per 100 square feet of floor area) would be 46 spaces. The proposal is for 52 1spaces, two of which are ADA accessible stalls--6 stalls over the maximum allowed. There will be no new net impervious surface for the site and the existing storm water detention system will be used. The existing surface water drainage system within the parking lot will remain the same. Roof downspouts from the building will be connected to the drainage system. There will be some increase in noise levels for the duration of project construction. PART TWO: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW In compliance with RCW 43.21C.240, the following project environmental review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. A. Environmental Impacts The Proposal was circulated and reviewed by various City Departments and Divisions to determine whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed development. Staff reviewers have identified that the proposal is likely to have the following probable impacts: Analysis of the project does not reveal any impacts that require mitigation above and beyond existing code. B. Recommendation Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommend that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINATION OF DETERMINATION OF NON SIGNIFICANCE NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED. XX Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS-M with 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS-M with 14 day Comment Period with a Concurrent 14 day Appeal Period. SITERC.DOC City of Renton P/B/PWDeparhnent Administrative Site Plan Approval& mental Review Committee Staff Report JACK'IV JO'S BEACH BAR&GRILL LUA-98 139,SA A,ECF REPORTANDDECIEIONOFOCTOBER 6,1998 Page 3 of 7 C. MitigaItion Measures No mitigation measures are recommended. Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. i Fire Prevention 1. Separate plans and permits are required for any modification of kitchen hood fire suppression systems. 2. Existing Mood fire system shall be serviced prior to opening. 3. Annual Place of Assembly permit is required from the Fire Department. Building 4. All construction must comply with the 1997 Uniform Building Code. Planning 5. Refuse collection areas are required to be screened and must be easily accessible by hauling trucks. 1 PART THREE: ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION - REPORT& DECISION This decision on the administrative land use action is made concurrently with the environmental determination A. Type of Land Use Action XX Site Plan Review Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Conditional Use Binding Site Plan Special Permit for Grade& Fill Administrative Code Determination B. Exhibits The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing: application, proof of posting and publication, environmental review and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No. 2: Drawing No. 1, Site Plan (Received September 4, 1998). Exhibit No. 3: Drawing No. 2, Building Floor Plan (Received September 4, 1998). Exhibit No. 4: Drawing No. 3, Building Elevation (Received September 4, 1998). SITERC.DOC City of Renton PB/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Er ,(mental Review Committee Staff Report JACK`N JO'S BEACH BAR&GRILL LUA-98 139,SA A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OFOCTOBER 6,1998 Page 4 of 7 C. Consistency with Site Plan Criteria 1. GENERAL CRITERIA: a. Conformance with the comprehensive plan, its elements and policies; The site is designated Employment Area - Valley (EAV) on the Comprehensive Plan Map. The EAV designation is intended to provide for a mixture of commercial, office and industrial uses. The proposed development is consistent with this designation. The proposal is consistent with the following Employment Area-Valley policy: Policy LU-212.2 Compatible and related land uses should be encouraged to locate in proximity to one another. b. ; Conformance with existing land use regulations; The s I subject site is located in the Commercial Arterial (CA) zone. The CA zone allows eating and drinking establishments as a permitted use. Jack in Jos Beach Bar& Grill, a restaurant, falls within this category. The CA zone allows a maximum lot coverage of 65% and a maximum height of 50 feet. A landscaped setback of 10 feet is also required in this zone. The existing development on the subject site meets the height, lot coverage, and setback requirements of the CA zone. The proposal includes additional landscaping (the existing palm tree will remain), modifications to the building facades, and the addition of a new entryway vestibule--all of which comply with the development standards of the zone. The CA zone also requires a pedestrian connection from the street to the main entrance of the building. The One of the entrance driveways is proposed to be removed and replaced with a walkway and ADA accessible ramp to the modified entryway. The required parking for the site is 46 spaces (1 space per 100 square feet of floor area at 4,640 square feet). The applicant is requesting a parking modification to allow 6 spaces over the maximum allowed--for a total of 52 spaces on the site. Staff will recommend as a condition of approval that the applicant successfully obtain a modification from the parking standards to exceed the maximum number of spaces allowed on the site or revise the site plan to reflect a maximum of 46 parking stalls. If the additional spaces are permitted, the site plan will need to be revised to show the required width of 10 feet for parallel stalls (currently the site plan shows 9 feet). Furthermore, an additional ADA accessible stall will be required if the parking modification is allowed (parking lots between 51 and 75 stalls require 3 accessible spaces--the site plan shows two). c. Mitigation of impacts to surrounding properties and uses; The proposal would not adversely impact surrounding properties and uses. The subject site is surrounded by developed commercial uses, such as restaurants, retail, and auto dealerships. d. I Mitigation of impacts of the proposed site plan to the site; The proposal is not expected to adversely impact the site. The site is fully developed, but is currently vacant. Construction activities related to the proposed modifications to the site will be required to utilize best management practices which will reduce potential impacts to the site. e. Conservation of area-wide property values; The proposal will allow a currently vacant building to be redeveloped and utilized. The modifications to the site and future use as a restaurant will conserve property values in the vicinity. SITERC.DOC City of Renton PB/PWDepartment Administrative Site Plan Approval&Er, _!mental Review Committee Staff jReport JACK`N JO'S BEACH BAR& GRILL LUA-98 139,SA A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OFOCTOBER 6,1998 Page S of 7 f. Safety and efficiency of vehicle and pedestrian circulation; Currently, there are two entrances to the site off of Hardie Avenue SW and one entrance off of SW 7th Street. The proposal will eliminate the southern entrance off of Hardie and will replace it with a pedestrian walkway connection and ADA accessible ramp. The existing parking lot has the appropriate aisle widths and backout distances required. The proposed modifications to the site will not create any adverse conditions for the safety and efficiency of vehicle and pedestrian circulation. g. Provision of adequate light and air; The proposed development will allow adequate light and air circulation to the existing building and the site. h. Mitigation of noise, odors and other harmful or unhealthy conditions; The subject site is fully developed, but is currently vacant. Noise and odor impacts in the vicinity will not have a significant increase due to the proposed development. The proposal is not expected to create any harmful or unhealthy conditions. Noise, dust, and odors which may result from the temporary construction on the site will be mitigated by the construction mitigation plan. i. Availability of public services and facilities to accommodate the proposed use;and The subject site is adequately served by public services and facilities. j. Prevention of neighborhood deterioration and blight. No deterioration or blight is expected to occur as a result of the proposal. In reviewing the proposal with respect to the site Plan Approval Criteria set forth in Section 4-31- 33(D) of the Site Plan Ordinance, the following issues have been identified by City Departmental Reviewers and Divisional Reviewers: XX Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. Copies of,all Review Comments are attached to this report. D. Findings, Conclusions& Decision Having reviewed the written record in the matter, the City now enters the following: 1) Request: The Applicant has requested Environmental Review and Site Plan Approval for Jack'n Jo's Beach Bar&Grill. 2) Environmental Review: The applicant's file containing the application, State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation, the comments from various City departments, the public notices requesting citizen comment, and other pertinent documents was entered as Exhibit No. 1. 3) 'Site Plan Review: The applicant's site plan application complies with the requirements for information for site plan review. The applicant's site plan and other project drawings are entered as Exhibits No. 2 thru 4. 4) Comprehensive Plan: The subject proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Employment Area - Valley. SITERC.DOC i City of Renton PB/PWDepartment Administrative Site Plan Approval&1; ;inmental Review Committee Staff Report JACK`NJO'S BEACH BAR&GRILL LUA-98 139,SA A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF OCTOBER 6,1998 Page 6 of 7 5) , Zoning: The Conditional Use as presented, complies with the zoning requirements and development standards of the Commercial Arterial Zoning designation. 1 6) ; Existing Land Use: Land uses surrounding the subject site include: North: Developed, CA zoned property (auto dealership, shopping center); East: Developed, CA zoned property (restaurant); South: Developed, CA zoned property (restaurants, shopping center) and West: Developed, CA zoned property (gas station, shopping center). E. Conclusions 1) : The subject proposal complies with the policies and codes of the City of Renton. 2) The proposal complies with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Employment Area - Valley and the Zoning designation of Commercial Arterial. i 1 F. Decision The Site Plan for Jack 'n Jo's Beach Bar& Grill, File No. LUA-98-139, SA-A, ECF, is approved subject to the following conditions. CONDITIONS: 1. The applicant shall successfully obtain a modification from the parking standards from the Administrator of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department. The modification request is to exceed the maximum number of parking spaces allowed on the site. If the modification is approved, the applicant shall submit a revised site plan showing the required width of 10 feet for parallel stalls and an additional ADA accessible stall--for a total of three provided for the site. The revised site plan is subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of building permits. 1 If the modification is denied, the applicant shall submit a revised site plan showing a maximum of 46 parking stalls as required per code. The revised site plan is subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of building permits. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the adopted sign code--only one freestanding sign is permitted per street frontage and must be located on the subject property. 2. The applicant shall retain the existing palm tree located on the eastern boundary of the site. EFFECTIVE DATE OF DECISION ON LAND USE ACTION: October 12, 1998 SIGNATURES: James C.Hanson,Zoning Administrator date SITERC.DOC City of Renton P/B PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&E nmental Review Committee Staff Report JACK`N JO'S BEACH BAR&GRILL LUA-98139,SA A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF OCTOBER 6,1998 Page 7 of 7 TRANSMITTED this 12th day of October, 1998 to the applicant and owner: R.A.M.A.C. (owner) do Dan Shane 1 20919 SE 34th Street Issaquah, WA 98029 Billy McHales Cokporation(applicant) do John Hoehl 651 Strander Blvd.#B208 Tukwilla,WA 98'188 TRANSMITTED October 12, 1998 to the following: Larry Meckling,Building Official C.Duffy,Fire Prevention Neil Watts,Public Works Division Lawrence J.Warren,City Attorney South County Journal Environmental Determination and Land Use Decision Appeal Process Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3),WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM October 26, 1998. If no appeals arse filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. SITERC.DOC • • LEGAL DESCRIPTION NLwwr. o-51� STREET AOOR25 KS TN IN ST. • TAX PARCH 10. 151506.401T ' TIC 50IRN 2M PEET OP WE Tam TOO FEET CP TIC EAST ILO FEET • OP 80.104B.LOT I.YGTIW IT.TORd9P 91ORIN MWT 5 BAST, - INN..IN KISS COUNTY,RAYENSTOR LOTS STAR NOMUAY. - • RE110NE G05TIN5 GIRD 1 DRIVE ADD f4iN LA.1ID1LAR115 REMOVE GROINS CLR9 1 LAOI SCANN6 ADD NEN CI.RS 1 PATCH DRIVE AS REOP. ERST016 FIR TREES V 4 • ' EOSENS PARKINS • 37 ,`-FROP.LOE 265D1' LOT LKMO l(l _i�A y= A D j�� y. _ � ��i W $ --. �-�� ',S .'ST 4 R'X2•STALLS la . • 1[ EASTIN6 -= EXISTOtl PIR TREE EI AI EAST.11114' EASTIN6 Eh % EN5TM5 F • ,I' , • • allr'TER 6RPASE CB CO ma RAY I I IN I1OTCEl'TOR 52 PARIUH6 STALLS Fp EXISnNS FIR TREES ad __a___ �Y Z I R O'STALLS • >• ILI• Is 3 11 A—. NEW 1RE 1 Yti 'N6 TPIl . 1(iYPGNJ W I ll N - NSF. I _.j_ - •- - � P ? j££ 1g T � EXISTING rt.' ' I S t RESTAURANT �" \ �` � R'•o S T • BUILDING %` j ,�,.,�''YATwE (N I T- - 9'x23',5TALL5 , ..... HICRI>P-I.DSLa4 + � Ha I �ENCL05ED F S_ 1 1 _ 'L t Oo 12'LON6NRALSYEATSER I • R 'OS �F L A ,0.ei R (rplr £ I _^_--l'ATIMI • _ �_ �\ EXIST.SIDEWALK _ • __�__p• i: � .\ WOP.LINE 26501' 1 EXI5DN5 \ •.„MI - LOT 1.N6 P1K. 09TINL•211 I • Z PALM TREE •. _� LOT LI6HTIN6 PYLON SISAL J REMOVE EXISTINS DRIVE • —_ _ __ ` _ fEPA1R510�'`AL"' HARDIE AVENUE S.W. — — — \TYPICAL —H . • IANmE¢APINS— — — — — EXET1N5 TREES TO 10814/.44 EX15TRb PALM TREE TO REMAIN EXISTMS LANDSCAPING TO REMAIN NEVI PECDRAT1VE 612A5S2 NET LAND C D AFE ECU ERS • Z PROJECT RECAP PARKINS RECAP . w 1 SITE AREA••J420 SP PARKINS REBORED R I PER 100 SP al co EN b LCINS AREA•41.0 SF PARKINS REWIRED. P STALLS•46 LOT COVE RASE•II66 PARKINS PROVIDED.52 SID..STALLS ALLS • LANDSCAPES AREA•220`F HANDICAP STALLS•2 STALLS SITE PLAN SCALE: I"=2O'-O" NORTH J LL1 7dfi -- -- -'--- - ——--- . —------ - --- ------ - --- --=--- ------ -- -- --- --- --- ------ - ----- -- --- ----- -- -- ---- -- - -- - ---— - -- -- -- ------ - - - -- — ---- --- -- -- 1f1 Dato. .1-490 . . Project, KD70 • FILE, 062060 DT0/n. ,Lett • AO • • • ROUGH STANDING SEAM -�B'HORIZONTAL SIDING METAL ROOF 4'HORIZONTAL SIDING • IMITATION BOARD II BATT SIDING BOARD a BAIT 51DI STANDING SEAM DECORATIVE LAMP CLERESTORY WINDOWS METAL ROOF CLEAR GLASS REMOVE EXISTING — CLERESTORY WINDOWS DRIVE-TARS CANOPY 'all MIME illllll Mildliins lllIMNIMI ..i�i�,�iU 11111 llfli ll1MMINElllllills LIMMIliiiin MIRIMMIMEN1ll�1'i111� �1I��111,17� = 1 p I� d 11 p ! �I i I ' 1 N II II d l I 1 �ul11111lllllI:::NIIII::::IBI,II::::IllllluIr z I11' IL j _ - 1 --. — --- -----J--- _ I j "Mil rk--Iv��. :_ _ I. 01 .— Jar .•� � Y' �_t. , iiii. m! WEATHERED PFAI PD POLES/ EAST ELEVATION ROPE WRAPPING SCALE: 1/4'=I'-O' C,. • f. STANDING SEAM STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF METAL ROOF BOARD 1 BATT SIDING 4'HORIZONTAL SIDI. (r IMITATION CLERESTORY WINDOWS DECORATIVE LAMP CLEAR GLASS \ - - CLERESTORY WINDOWS \� ,�����N�el�e- •"., t --- -�11i1� III/\�lllIllt ui,...___..----n.... .I 5- . Wgl ins_C !L�1milum ej_ �li1�: = : 1 el. I I i 1�•--• .i I I,. B'HORIZONTAL SIDING • II y . I I I N I �mINEN>,� i ; I, 1 11 •• I h —nigh I r 11 Aiming..■_ I - 111111 -- � / Il a 11 d 1 1 I I_1 I I d l p i � 1' I .m■......�I 7 1 1 II I G AlI ( u M1 6• _ I 1 1 .111 ko MilM IN elom .gm.. — lei —— 1 .qi�mig ._ 9/ °5—= M =�h alo -- -=�9' .11 `� ----- — I - — k. • WEATHERED PEALED POLES 'HORIZ if IV ROPE WRAPPING 8 HORIZONTAL SIDING CO t• NORTH ELEVATION O zq F SCALE I/8'-I'-0' ; IL iO ,- u�----—- ----------- ---------- ------ - - -- -- -- -- -- ------- --------- ---- ----- ------- -- - ------ -------- ----- --- -- -- --------- ---- -- ---- W • Oa., o-n-ve , Tror54 K5N FILE, E52NA2 Drexel. ,3AK A2 • • • • Rr Ybn. • ROUGH-CUT B'HORIZONTAL 5IDING STANDING SEAM • • . METAL ROOF IMITATION BOARD 4 BATT SIDING TINE LAMP• • CLERESTORY WINDOWS .... ., "all 1111111111110 1..... .. .. --, ... p' I. u • n u �{ ,I II y d f p n pi I I� I , u ? ,I 11li ' II IT ,i l it 9y lr : V II /; iHHJ1ftWHHH ;I Ii IaI , ! I I , ' II a I' 'I I II1 l' I Nf � fI (I � �, ti ' a I '� a I h Y - ,U I i..! I I;,•II "t., 'II'-• p 1 I, �, I �i • Ill��� I ;I• _-_- IJ �—. 1 • WEATHERED PEALED POLES/ -y W SOUTH ELEVATION • ROPE WRAPPING - - SCALE: I/B'=T-0' ROUGH-CUT ft 4"HORIZONTAL SIDING • 8'HORIZONTAL SIDING STANDING SEAM ' BOARD I BATT SIDING METAL ROOF DECORATIVE LAMP STANDING SEAM IMITATION BOARD 4 BATT SIDING . METAL ROOF CLEAR GLASS CLERESTORY WINDOWS - , , CLERESTORY WINDOWS REMOVE EXISTING DRIVE-THRU CANOPY Lam V Ill1:E il 1 1iIlliiIil .nt' ini... /11 i1� 1/ Ip1111111. .I1iii. 1 f1N 1iIItiiiCIIIiiiiiiiiiiil iiinlIiiiiiiili1 „ • I I ' Y a 1 I • lP I : , II IplI I if llu i I „ , , „ . , I I •„ .. . I I I • , , I r• I 1_bIIIII, ____ , _ , , : - • „• „._„___-_. . _ ...„........, . .... .., , . .,,,,.....,_ _ u.. IN 41^ limilmmo in • NZ MN 111111 • m \ WEATHERED in HI/ROPE DPPEALEED POLES WEST ELEVATION 0 SCALE: I/B'.I-0 ..PPING Q W • •Po4. 5-21-B • FILE, 1070A9 Oren, JPK AS • • • • :::iiii:i::ii:.:::i::iiii::v:i::i:?iii?isi::i:.::.�i:isi?iirii:i}.iii::v:i::ii:v::.:i:::::i:iii?ii::::i::iii::ii:4::".v.:..::.::• ...:.::::::::.:::........•'... ..••:.:i:i:ii::::•:}.�:i:?:iii:iiii:�ii:�:i:iiii::i::i:::i:i:Ai:i:.ii::vii::i::::::::'.:.�:.�.:.:v'v'. U NT.PLANNINGb . ! 1 N``_` `' " >``> ' ?? `» <> < < «>» aimi i On the '6 day of Octbbq. - , 1998, I deposited in the mails of'the United States, a seated envelope containing ERC� d e'Cevw tvtu..fiavm documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing • Department of Ecology Don Hurter ; WSDOT KC WastewaterjTreatment Division • Larry Fisher I Washington Department of Fisheries ' I David F. Dietznian Department of Natural Resources Shirley Lukhang Seattle Public Utilities Duwamish Indian Tribe Rod Malcom I Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Joe Jainga I 'Puget Sound Energy • • • (Signature ofiSender) STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS • COUNTY OF KING ) rr • I certify that II know or have satisfactory evidence that FF71 signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act fo he uses and purposes•• • mentioned in the instrument. Dated: bo I, i z.� I\To?a ,� ryPublic and for the State of W ' gton • (- Notary(Print) MARII YISLIK4__: Fes_ • My appointment a wininaSiON pazncs Grara Project Name: Uac.k. r bus 8ea.c,11 6av atyed Grit) Project Numb•er: LOB ,��„ 13°I , SIA -A ELF NOTARY.DOC 0 . � CITY )F RENTON k* ,F Planning/Building/Public Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator Jesse Tanner,Mayor October 08, 1998 1 , Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 ,I Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Subject: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for r the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on October 06, 1998: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE. • I ' JACK N'JO'S BEACH BAR&GRILL LUA-984139,SA-A,ECF - The applicant is requesting Administrative.Site Plan approval and environmental review for a tenant improvement to an existing building. The interior of the 4,540 square foot building will be remodeled and a 100 square foot entry vestibule will be added to the north side of the building. The applicant is also requesting a modification to the parking ordinance in order to exceed the maximum number of parking spaces allowed for the site. Location: 105 SW 7th Street. • Appeals of either the environmental determination, [RCW43.21.0075(3),WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM October 26, 1998. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City Of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)430-6510. If you have questions, please call me at (425)430-7270. For the Environmental Review Committee, q Lesley Nishihira Project Manager . cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division V Larry Fisher,Department of Fisheries David F: Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources Don Hurter, Department of Transportation - Shirley_Lukhang, Seattle Public Utilities Duwamish Tribal Office Rod Malcom, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (Ordinance) Joe Jairiga, Puget Sound Energy AGNCYLTR.DOC1 'I 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer, - d a CITY JF-RENTON -• :ems"'�;- �'..,• . Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator October 08, 1998 • Mr. John Wojtacha Restaurant Space Design 15935 NE 8th Street, 6101 Bellevue,WA 98008 • SUBJECT: Jack n'Jo's Beach Bar&Grill I Project No. LUA-98-139,SA-A,ECF Dear Mr.Wojtacha This letter is written on behalf of.the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) and is to inform you that they have completed their review of the environmental impacts of the above-referenced project. The Committee, on October 08, 1998, decided that your project will be issued a Determination of Non-Significance. The City of Renton ERC has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). This decision was made by the ERC under the iauthority of Section 4-6-6, Renton Municipal Code, after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information, on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM October 26, 1998. If no appeals are filed by this date,both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City lof Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. .Additional information regarding the appeal process may be.obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)430-6510. If you have any;questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at (425) 430-7270. For the Environmental Review Committee, Lesley Nishihira Project Manager cc: R.A.M.A.C.%Owners • _ • • .Bill M cHales Corporation/Applicant.:' ' • - • • DNcI tR nrir.` - - 1055,South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 • • CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NUMBER: LUA-98-139,SA-A,ECF APPLICANT: Billy McHales Corporation PROJECT NAME: Jack n'Jo's Beach Bar&Grill DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan approval and environmental review for a tenant improvement to an existing building. The interior of the 4,540 square foot building will be remodeled and a 100 square foot entry vestibule will be added to the north side of the building. The applicant is also requesting a modification to the parking ordinance in order to exceed the maximum number of parking spaces allowed for the site. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL 105 SW 7th Street Advisory Notes to Applicant The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations.; Fire Prevention 1. Separate plans and permits are required for any modification of kitchen hood fire suppression systems. 2. Existiing hood fire system shall be serviced prior to"opening. , 3. Annual Place of Assembly permit is required from the Fire Department. •" Buildin • . 4. All construction must comply with the 1997 Uniform Building Code. ' ' Planning 5. Refuse collection areas are required to be screened and must be easily accessible by hauling trucks. CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE SITE PLAN CONDITIONS APPLICATION NUMBER: LUA-98-139,SA-A,ECF APPLICANT: Billy McHales Corporation PROJECT NAME: Jack n'Jo's Beach Bar&Grill 1 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan approval and environmental review for a tenant improvement to an existing building. The interior of the 4,540 square foot building will be remodeled and a 100 square foot entry vestibule will be added to,the north side of the building. The applicant is also requesting a modification to the parking ordinance in order to exceed the maximum number of parking spaces allowed for the site. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 105 SW 7th Street The Site' Plan for Jack in Jo's Beach Bar& Grill, File No. LUA-98-139, SA-A, ECF, is approved subject to the following conditions. CONDITIONS: 1. The applicant shall successfully obtain a modification from the parking standards from the Administrator of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department. The modification request is to exceed the maximum number of parking spaces allowed on the site. If the; modification is approved, the applicant shall submit a revised site plan showing the required width of 10 feet for parallel stalls and an,additional ADA accessible stall--for a total of three provided for the site. The revised site plan is subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of building permits. If the, modification is denied, the applicant shall submit a revised site plan showing a maximum of 46 parking stalls as required per code. The revised site plan is subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of building permits. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the adopted sign code--only one freestanding sign is permitted per street frontage and must be located on the subject property. 2. The applicant shall retain the existing palm tree located on the eastern boundary of the site. AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Lori L. Furnish first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of the SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL N, NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL - _DETERMINATION-- 600 S. Washington Avenue, Kent, Washington 98032 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON,WASHINGTON a dailynewspaper seven (7)times a week. Said newspaper is a le alThehas Environmentalsued aDetermination Review CommitteeofoNon- newspaper publishedg � -(ERC) issued a of No - of general publication and is now and has been for more than six months ' Significance for the following project under prior to the date ofpublication, referred to, printed andpublished in the English language . the authority of the Renton Municipal 9� Code. continually as a daily newspaper in Kent, King County, Washington. The South County .JACK N'JO'S BEACH BAR&GRILL Journal has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the LUA-98-139,SA-A,ECF Administrative site plan approval and envi- State of Washington for King County. i ronmentel review for improvement to an The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the South County existing building.Location: 105 SW 7th St. Journal (and not in supplemental form)which was regularly distributed to the subscribers ` Appeals of either the environmental determination (RCW'43.21.0075(3), WAC during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a 197-11-680) and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM October 26, 1998. If no appeals are Jack'N Joe's Beach Bar Grill l filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing as published on: 10/12/98 together with the required$75.00 appltca-, tion fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of$38.40 o WA 98055.Appeals to the Examiner are l governed by City of Renton 'Municipal Legal Number 5265 Code Section 4-8-11 B.Additional inforrna-_ II tion regarding the appeal process may be ,� ''_obtained from-_the._Renton_City_Clerk's ", �Q Publication (425) ate0 6510. � O" Z i, Publication Date: October 12,1998 Legal Cler , outh ounty Journal r .Published-in_the-South-County Journal October 12,.1998.5265 9 ' II l_ Subscribed and sworn before me on this 1 to ay of 0 CI , 199 7 �`®`elar,atotPrrr`- rajt_45-c-N Y1(\ `` idk,1 1 qa .:•Z•o� o Notary Public of the State of Washington �' ;;1 residing in Renton • -. - King County, Washington Rea..`�yJ e •.f NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. JACK N' JO'S BEACH BAR & GRILL LUA-98-139,SA-A,ECF Administrative site plan approval and environmental review for improvement to an existing building. Location: 105 SW 7th St. Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM October 26, 1998. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton . City Clerks Office, (425) 430-6510. Publication Date: October 12, 1998 Account No. 51067 dnspub i I • , . r • , . . . NoTio ,-. , "i ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION • POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: JACK N.JO'S BEACH BAR IS GRILL PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-98-139,SA-A,ECF The applicant Is requesting Administrative Site Plan approval and environmental review for a tenant Improvement to an existing building.The interior of the 4,540 square foot building will be remodeled and a 100 . square foot entry vestibule will be added to the north side of the building. The applicant Is also requesting a ' modification to the parking ordinance in order to exceed the maximum number of parking spaces allowed for the ' ' site.Location:105 SW 7th Street.. ' • THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of either the environmental determination[RCW 43.21.0075(3),WAC 197-11-680]andlor the , land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM October 26,1998. If no appeals are filed by this date,both actions will become final.Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required$75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner,City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-6-118. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office,(425)430- 6510. • • • ii 19 0 .. O �� a ..b srfa t , ,fit. ' 71 M1 - RI %' : 1 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION,PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON,DEVELOPMENT • SERVICES DIVISION AT(425)430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please:nclude•the project NUMBER when calling for proper ple,identification.• • CERTIFICATION • I, ligl,b4 Nrs,Jt 7' q , hereby certify that _' copies of the above document'were posted by me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby. the described property on - = ,�cq arm)�/ f Jp r 1 q q� Signed: ' 1 e)-2-,-) ATTEST: Subcribed and vorn before me, a Nortary Public,in and f the State of Washington residing in , on the a kijj, day of C9cA. I • ' . *-7----2 /e&e-t.. .,-. , . (e.,-)AAA,e-e-edi . ' MARILYN KAMCHEFF • COMMISSION EXPIRES 6/29/99 __lotici ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: : JACK N'JO'S BEACH BAR&GRILL PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-98-139,SA-A,ECF The applicant is riequesting Administrative Site Plan approval and environmental review for a tenant improvement to an existing building. The interior of the 4,540 square foot building will be remodeled and a 100 square foot entry vestibule will be added to the north side of the building. The applicant is also requesting a modification to the parking ordinance in order to exceed the maximum number of parking spaces allowed for the site. Location: 105 SW 7th Street.. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of either the environmental determination[RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM October 26, 1998. If no appeals are filed by this date,both actions!will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required$75.00 application fee. with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430- 6510. 1.—?`\!'ate ',°,•,'< : lag '''pe.,,,!,/, . - ' :,•.,„\\,;%-- 1) ...,,,,..:',,,..:„_: e: ,,,,w t, ,„,- ,,, ,,,,,,„:„..------or-1,0, fp .„,,,, . ._............... .,,,:d ,...,. i,oil 1-4 ,.;t7f.:1 ag;'"'""2 11-?): : 4E1 H - 1;it --"" 5:;:.:---i .• , --r- I , ,' I - :. .0„.. •-• .�tt,DY 00.'itP'33 4:��` 1 : till1. '. - n FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT I SERVICES DIVISION AT(425)430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION e ::calitn : or> ro .erfle;>7den.i..ica Car>r.. >;>':;`: ><:?;;:; ::::::::::::<:<:;:::::. :Please::.lnclutle.:the:: .r::o e�t;;:NUMBER,wh n:.::::<:.::.:,.;g#...:.:;;:P: :P.;:;:.: >::.:::::.:.,;..::..:::.....:.:;:.:.::..:....:......... i CITY OF RENTON j DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE i APPLICATION NUMBER: LUA-98-139,SA-A,ECF APPLICANT: 1 Billy McHales Corporation PROJECT NAME: Jack n'Jo's Beach Bar&Grill 1 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan approval and environmental review for a tenant improvement to an existing building. The interior of the 4,540 square foot building will be remodeled and a 100 square foot entry vestibule will be added to the north side of the building. The applicant is also requesting a modification to the parking ordinance in order to exceed the maximum number of parking spaces allowed for the site. 1 LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 105 SW 7th Street LEAD AGENCY: 1 City of Renton I Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section This Determination of Non-Significance is issued under WAC 197-11-340. Because other agencies of jurisdiction may be involved,the lead lagency will not act on this proposal for fourteen (14)days. Appeals of eithe l the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3),WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM October 26, 1998. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: October 12, 1998 DATE OF DECISION: October 06, 1998 SIGNATURES: e /0/‘//4' Gregg' e ZirtS man, minlstrator DATE Departmen PI " ning/Building/Public Works \\_..---it..;:",' f--- 7' L� / ci ' Jim Shepherd, inistrator DATE Community Services Department /,?V/-d‘---- / ' ' e 2 Lee Wh er, Fire Chief DATE Renton Fire Department DNSSIG.DOC • • CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE • ADVISORY NOTES • APPLICATION NUMBER: LUA-98-139,SA-A,ECF APPLICANT: Billy McHales Corporation PROJECT NAME: Jack n'Jo's Beach Bar&Grill DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan approval and environmental review for a tenant improvement to an existing building. The interior of the 4,540 square foot building will be remodeled and a 100 square foot entry vestibule will be added to the north side of the(building. The applicant is also requesting a modification to the parking ordinance in order to exceed thel maximum number of parking spaces allowed for the site. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL 105 SW 7th Street Advisory Notes to Applicant The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Fire Prevention 1. Separate plans and permits are required for any modification of kitchen hood fire suppression systems. 2. Existing hood fire system shall be serviced prior to opening. 3. Annual Place of Assembly permit is required from the Fire Department. Building 4. All consfruction must comply with the 1997 Uniform Building Code. Planning 5. Refuse icollection areas are required to be screened and must be easily accessible by hauling trucks. CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE SITE PLAN CONDITIONS APPLICATION NUMBER: LUA-98-139,SA-A,ECF APPLICANT: Billy McHales Corporation PROJECT NAME: Jack n'Jo's Beach Bar&Grill DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: . The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan approval and environmental review for a tenant improvement to an existing building. The interior of the 4,540 square foot building will be remodeled and a 100 square foot entry vestibule will be added to the north side of the building. The applicant is also requesting a modification to the parking ordinance in order to exceed the maximum number of parking spaces allowed for the site. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 105 SW 7th Street The Site Plan for Jack `n Jo's Beach Bar&Grill, File No. LUA-98-139, SA-A, ECF, is approved subject to the following conditions. CONDITIONS: 1. The applicant shall successfully obtain a modification from the parking standards from the Administrator of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department. The modification request is to!exceed the maximumnumber of parking spaces allowed on the site. If the modification is approved, the applicant shall submit a revised site plan showing the required width of 10 feet for parallel stalls and an additional ADA accessible stall--for a total of three provided for the site. The revised site plan is subject to the review and approval of - the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of building permits. If the modification is denied, the applicant shall submit a revised site plan showing a maximum of 46 parking stalls as required per code. The revised site plan is subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of building permits. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the adopted sign code--only one freestanding sign is permitted per street frontage and must be located on the subject property. 2. . The applicant shall retain the existing palm tree located on the eastern boundary of the site., City', Fenton Department of Planning/Building/Pziti►ic Works ENVIRONMENTAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 'tcoviovvItc. Dc.UatopAllieVl'� COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 APPLICATION NO:1 LUA-98-139,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: SEPTEMBER 17, 1998 APPLICANT: John!Hoehl(Billy McHales Corporation) PROJECT MANAGER: Jennifer Toth Henning PROJECT TITLE: Jack n'Jo's Beach Bar&Grill WORK ORDER NO: 78432 LOCATION: 105 SW 7th Street SITE AREA: 39,750 sq.ft. I BUILDING AREA(gross): 5,500 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: John Hoehl Billy McHales Corporation, has applied for environmental review(ECF) and administrative site plan review(SA-A)for a tenant improvement to an existing building. The 5,500 sq.ft. building would be remodeled and an entry vestibule would be added on the north side. Parking for 52 vehicles is proposed. Applicant ." requests to deviate from parking standards to exceed required parking by six cars. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major information Environment Minor Major Information 1 Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth I Housing Air I Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants I Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health ; Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation ! Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet • I , B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS oNi V pot_ 1 s s u-05 • �011 • C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where rtiona ►nv ' needed to properly assess this proposal c ^ Si ature o i ector or A rized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 • City of-j,,ton Department of Planning/Building/Pubs brks Y ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:Su..v ?c � ���i"t COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 30,0n998 APPLICATION NO: ILUA-98-139,'SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: SEPTEMBER 17, 1998,'�-0*� APPLICANT: John Hoehl(Billy McHales Corporation) PROJECT MANAGER: Jennife.F.T,oth Hengibg 71, PROJECT TITLE: Jack n'Jo's Beach Bar&Grill WORK ORDER NO: 78432 7 LOCATION: 105 SW 7th Street ,cr V SITE AREA: 39,750 sq.ft. I BUILDING AREA(gross): 5,500 sq.ft. s®0�{' SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: John Hoehl Billy McHales Corporation, has applied for environmental review(Ek) and administrative site'plan review(SA-A)for a tenant improvement to an existing building. The 5,500 sq.ft. building would be remodeled and!an entry vestibule would be added on the north side. Parking for 52 vehicles is proposed. Applicant requests to deviate from parking standards to exceed required parking by six cars. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth I Housing Air Aesthetics Water I Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use I Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ j Historic/Cultural Natural Resources I Preservation Airport Envimnment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet • • B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS (Vo tht:✓t.or.24 to lwyCvvloul 5u> v7 GUzect Sa�� t) tie. tLU(u t tt e D(t7`em Wa tot- iI44t/ // pre,v/s/oy Ire ul✓tC[ • C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS N� Pc4i Itc bovzIv, 9 Vwrits 07 --le,e4 associated tLu-i 1ovoposa/ • We_have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have Identified areas of probable impact or areas where additionaiinformation is needed to properly assess this proposal. q/2- //1 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 City orrtenton Department of Planning/Building/Puvnc`'Vorks ENVIRONIMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:`vtuA Po corm COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 APPLICATION NO:, LUA-98-139,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: SEPTEMBER 17, 1998 APPLICANT: John Hoehi(Billy McHales Corporation) PROJECT MANAGER: Jennifer Toth Henning PROJECT TITLE: Jack n'Jo's Beach Bar&Grill WORK ORDER NO: 78432OPRPivr LOCATION: 105 SW 7th Street Sip. SITE AREA: 39,750 sq.ft. I BUILDING AREA(gross): 5,500 s 1. / 4998 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: John Hoehi Billy McHales Corporation, has applied for environmental review .) and administrative site plan review(SA-A)for a tenant improvement to an existing building. The 5,500 sq.ft. i •, kry»,,,ould be remodeled and an entry vestibule would be added on the north side. Parking for 52 vehicles is proposed. • <nt requests to deviate from parking standards to exceed required parking by six cars. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major information Impacts impacts Necessary impacts impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water I LightGlare Plants i Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals I Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ HistorldCuitural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet • I . B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS No tddittowu,I )►%ip. uSsocla 01 w t 1 et.1 ttt ItMrv?. A10 lye/cc, • wt i l icittttOh -fee ✓eetPt id, 5:te a I✓tadti -A i! ,k9/vo Ird (AA if sick ua/A.5 a foil 111/ta ✓0�7 . C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS k) cOm4witki.t. We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas In which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional infonnaati form is needed needed to properly assess this proposal. /V et/l UV�.'I e/Z 4/q Q Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 City or:rcenton Department of Planning/Building/Public-Works ENVIRONMENTAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ��ah 'ReUtGw- l.jat� COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 APPLICATION NO:I LUA-98-139,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: SEPTEMBER 17, 1yOPE APPLICANT: John Hoehl.(Billy McHales Corporation) PROJECT MANAGER: Jennifer Toth Henning+r..`t• , Oly PROJECT TITLE: Jack n'Jo's Beach Bar&Grill WORK ORDER NO: 78432 86p , LOCATION: 105 SW 7th Street • ��/ I),1 1�9� SITE AREA: 39,750 sq.ft. I BUILDING AREA(gross): 5,500 sq.ft. dIOs/� SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: John Hoehl Billy McHales Corporation, has applied for environmental review(ECF) anti administrative site plan review(SA-A)for a tenant improvement to an existing building. The 5,500 sq.ft. building would be remodeled and an entry vestibule would be added on the north side. Parking for 52 vehicles is proposed. Applicant requests to deviate from parking standards to exceed required parking by six cars. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment i Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth i Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants I Recreation Land/Shoreline Use I Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ j Historic/Cultural Natural Resources I Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet • B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is ne ed to property assess this proposal. Nketit ef/e4A% Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 iI i City c' _==nton Department of Planning/Building/Puunc Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Fib p e«tltrv� COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMB q }30,rq FIRE DEPT APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-139,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: SEPTEMBER 19R6998S, . APPLICANT: John!Hoehl(Billy McHales Corporation) PROJECT MANAGER: Jennifer Toth Heq irlg PROJECT TITLE: Jack n'Jo's Beach Bar&Grill WORK ORDER NO: 78432 O�t lgg� • LOCATION: 105 SW 7th Street C 4 SITE AREA: 39,750 sq.ft. I BUILDING AREA(gross): 5,500 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: John Hoehl Billy McHales Corporation, has applied for environmental review(ECF) and administrative site plan review(SA-A)for a tenant improvement to an existing building. The 5,500 sq.ft. building would be remodeled and an entry vestibule would be added on the north side. Parking for 52 vehicles is proposed. Applicant requests to deviate from parking standards to exceed required parking by six cars. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet i B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS I19 C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS ad el%l c el 1,opo� We have revie ed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where addition I information is eded to properly assess this proposal. fir' Signatur of tractor or AuthorizedRe resentative Date DEVAPP. C Rev.10/93 I l ti TY 0 OYt CITY OF RENTON FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU MEMORANDUM DATE: September 21, 1998 TO: Jennifer Toth Henning, Planner Q� FROM: Jim Gray, Assistant Fire Marsha !� SUBJECT: Jack 85 Jo's Beach Bar 85 Grill, 1 5 SW 7th St. Fire Department Comments: 1. Separate plans and permits are required for any modification of kitchen hood fire suppression systems. 2. Existing Hood fire system shall be serviced prior to opening. 3. Annual Place of Assembly permit is required from the Fire Department. Pleas I feel free to contact me if you have any questions. • City or Kenton Department of Planning/Building/PublicWorks • ENVIRONMENTAL 8 EVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: po1 COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 30; 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-139 A-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: SEPTEMBER 17, 1998 APPLICANT: John Hoehl (Billy cHales Corporation) PROJECT MANAGER: Jennifer Toth Henning PROJECT TITLE: Jack n'Jo's Beach Bar&Grill WORK ORDER NO: 78432 LOCATION: 105 SW 7th Street SITE AREA: 39,750 sq.ft. I BUILDING AREA(gross): 5,500 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: John Hoehl Billy McHales Corporation, has applied for environmental review(ECF) and administrative site plan review(SA-A)for a tenant improvement to an existing building. The 5,500 sq.ft. building would be remodeled and an entry vestibule would be added on the north side. Parking for 52 vehicles is proposed. Applicant requests to deviate from parking standards to exceed required parking by six cars. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth I Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health i Public Services v Energy/ i Historlc/Cuitural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet Lnc'a— /i,rzi-Caj oe•Th • B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS • • • • C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. e. /0-rs) Signature of Director of'N thorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 City or rcenton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: iPa COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-139,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: SEPTEMBER 17, 1998 APPLICANT: John Hoehl(Billy McHales Corporation) PROJECT MANAGER: Jennifer Toth Henning PROJECT TITLE: jack n'Jo's Beach Bar&Grill WORK ORDER NO: 78432 I ' LOCATION: 105 SW 7th Street SITE AREA: 39,750 sq.ft. BUILDING AREA(gross): 5,500 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: John Hoehl Billy McHales Corporation, has applied for environmental review(ECF) and administrative site plan review(SA-A)for a tenant improvement to an existing building. The 5,500 sq.ft. building would be remodeled and an entry vestibule would be added on the north side. Parking for 52 vehicles is proposed. Applicant requests to deviate from parking standards to exceed required parking by six cars. • A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major information impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth I Housing Air I Aesthetics Water I Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation _ Environmental Health I Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources I Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet airy • /zo .A"'''Lpte T /0/)4 • B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS gam44.. •• C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is nee ed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or uthorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC i Rev.10/93 City ..anton Department of Planning/Building/Puorrc'Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:Cov‘Ovuckluv\ COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 APPLICATION NO:,LUA-98-139,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: SEPTEMBER 17, 1998 APPLICANT: John Hoehi(Billy McHales Corporation) PROJECT MANAGER: Jennifer Toth Henning PROJECT TITLE: Jack n'Jo's Beach Bar&Grill WORK ORDER NO: 78432 LOCATION: 105 SW 7th Street SITE AREA: 39,750 sq.ft. I BUILDING AREA(gross): 5,500 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: John Hoehl Billy McHales Corporation, has applied for environmental review(ECF) and administrative site,plan review(SA-A)for a tenant improvement to an existing building. The 5,500 sq.ft. building would be remodeled and an entry vestibule would be added on the north side. Parking for 52 vehicles is proposed. Applicant requests to deviate from parking standards to exceed required parking by six cars. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing - Air I Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use I Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF REN T ON SEP 18 1993 RECE6 ED B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS /4440,-0744,,', GtJ°'z C 97 Cie re'4e We have re ewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where ldonal information is needed to properly assess this proposal. may` ght/ �rt Signature of Direc, or uthorized-Representativk' Date DEVAPP.DOC V Rev.10/93 ••: i'•:i: <?^:?v:vi:i��ii:??:•:`?�ii:{:i:L�i:is . p::{ii::?:�i:""igi3gi•i:FitiNi;.}}li'. •- "{:::::i:.:;i;}:.:':•?::::v.:m:::::i::::i:i;i•::vi:;??;u:ii.j}:::�:�iY:i?':G::ji:. . ; i:`:: ii :::i:i i ;: .;:;}.5 ; DEVELOPMENTSERVICES !t/t f N.�:> :>><:�::>::::::» <::::a>«:>:»:s:.>:>:s>::z%i>':�:::>:::;:::<::-:::::::'�:<::> ,............ + •�y.. ':tit: ..:i::$:'•::':':': . .:::i:SU .: �R DIN: ` ' L IS. 'h;G E R ®U N G .P RO PE R ' r : •:.^::Witty:..v,:,.h..:�.,.:"::.?.:.:.:.✓..x:.::y.:.........�....:..r....••;;..;� Y ..1..:.} .: {.....:.. ::.."y .. .�..... :;... ... v:: :: ::.::::: .v•:•:.v`. ...':•.v:::•.:..v.x.v:v:•.::::..:.:::::....... ...{..•:':iv:A:; sti:::<>:ti:;..ji{i :iititi:{i''•+i ...w i 00 ee �of.nth n.:3 .f t .the°su e::>�:»::>:�: :>:::<:::::<>>::::::>:>�::>: :::><:>:.<:;:;::>.::>::;:::»>:N::>:,.: .:;;::<:<:;:.r:<:•: ....,.:::.:::....::::........:.:•:.:;:.:::..;:.:::..... ... .... . . b ect:.sit ....................,.......................... ..:.::�:;:<:»::�::;;<:: PROJECT NAME: J A VO s 1-5/42- * 4R 6 L APPLICATION NO: 9 B' 131 Sri �1 Ed The following is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. The Development Services Division will notify these individuals of the proposed development. NAME - ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER • • • i ..� 0Y ':0-i..' ✓Y; ct, � CFj�; • 0A \J ' • 5.? . • ' • 172„ I • • . . T. i . ' (Attach additional sheets, if necessa'ry'- • ' .-" ..`".q. l (Continued) , NAME '• . '•ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER i i i , . r—r�, . t ::• . • Applicant Certification ` I, askIvI£5 A• Kure i xz , hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property (Print Name) . owners and their addresses were obtained from: ❑ City of Renton Technical Services Records ❑ Title Company Records XKing County Assessors Records ._. , Signe "r'' O' ,.i p� p)25. Date 1.,2 (Appl ant) NOTARY ATTESTED: ubscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, 'n and fo the State of Washington, • residing at__ on the tq day of ,e '/,;,r' , 19.9K. Signed ; GL'� Q)1,,bakettill (Notary Public) n:...}v..w..:.:..:..:..:?..ivv•..: .:.:.}:..r...i.}.•n.C...r.v v.,:vw•v:$irvrvn 4.n...n t..•g..:.:..•:..:..i.:...�.:.;::.v.;.::.:n v...u.:.x.n.{....:•}.::i...}:....,...,..v......:...?..e.o...,...:f..:..:...R..�.:.....:..drab ..:.n.••:•El...:.;..e.n..t.....:v...:...t....{;?,t....}v S.n...vv...i..r.}..}.:;•::.:{...:...:}...::.f:......:..i.v.....:..W......iv....v:x..:....:...}.;.r{....?....vn.v:.:'...•...i....}n..'...vn..;v..sr.:v....:..n:..}r.v..v...r.s.•.i: n..vv {...•..,...:.•;.rir•r.++{.n.}.•.}.:.:. ,{.r?Y+ :i.•:.:..}{•:.{w n:. .y..:..;..,.:::..: .x.:.•: n:....v:.:..::.........:..ti.:: :..v:::..r::v:::.,.. .. . } v •...v. .. :}ni ;•}}} }}.:... .............,.•......•..::.:.:{•;}.:.4.;?{.� .......v .... ..v.............r .: . ....v .rv.:., :., fi } ..R . tr•:...v :.:.:... ..: ;r :wv: ?::: f.:�....x::.,... :i::+F:xi. ::}...•.:. x:ii...}.}.:nv.:..:::.vw.;:•}:.L}};}• ::*::4;v;r:.::.9.}:r.i'•}.y:::i:v ..v}:::}n.v ::::::} }....s...:::n :Ef.::1 iMe.i.. : r .: . : .} .'' ?} 4 : : v : w. . . CAT 0l1[ OEM .....:.. ... ....... ...:...:ii ....:}:::::.v:::r....:nv;:::^:::::•:::.:...vr.....:..:.:,.•v:.v::.}t}i:•}:{.;rJY..,..{.riiiis wnv: .>t - • • ' , !11:0R y;cerq,,;;,. 6it;notic . ,..1.the ro osed a ..:1?.::..P. iication.::were:: acted::: aato f :Em1 ee r.Y.nr. .vrf...vF. ?:•,?{:iy}::'.;.{}{i'•}}:ti{.}�:}j{: :;::ti>.:}};: :::i}':;ti::•�:{}L>:}v::::::;{ :::Yj::�::{:y}{T.:is:i::i:::i:::::::ti::'{:':: :i :i:::ii{::;ti:�::•i:{:ii::. ... :x .... .:,r;..::: .........::.. ....... ,. . .. ::::::::::.'.v.... ..:.,..v§;:.i:r:............v.:...+.::iiFi*::: .} .: . ........ •:r S?S}K{r+}}i:{!s:::0:::i:i*:i:::K*ii: each.:) .'::��>;�::' .::.<};:.:;.:::i..::.:::.:::.:..:,,::::.:.:.:.:. .:}} ' .:.::::. ..::..:.:::..... .............. •>: .:..........::}:}:.y;• • {•:`.}>•+}•:i•}:•:•:}:::{:::::.....:...... ...;..`R::i:::;i::::r•::::i,:r:5:}ititi;:•}y;.....;y..:}y.,• .. .: ri:•}}::. .......-':.{:?4:br•:,};;:..}.,................nv:w.�n�::i}:{4}Y.:x?.�?•}v:6::::.:J:{{}i{' }:./... N:><:::: T� 0 A . u.0scribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing at :•onthe;: • . '::.::::.:.::.:: ............ +. day ofi f '. .,..;.. :` .: ::::.;;; ;'!9%P?:.}',.;';':> ;;.;;:: .:: listprop.doc MARIL KiIMCHEFF REV 07/95 COMMISSION EXPIRES 6/29/99 ##*********************************** '<********************************#*******s' * BATCH NUMBER: PI COMMENT _ * ,,, CUSTOMER NAME KUPPLER DESIGN * . , •.,k. te.rr,,,[ -^�Y' . �1f4tYYYif�Y4Y'YY • ♦%i�T tifY4YY•C " ••4.4YV-ri`,34Y�+d 'tiFYT;S y'TYTIv`iriT41rY* 182305-9038-05 182305-9038-05 KNACK FREDH+BRIOGE.ROBERT 242678 KNACK FRED H+BRIDGE,ROBERT 242678 OBA KCB CO DRA KCB CO PO BOX 1055 PG BOX 1055 RENTON WA 98057 • RENTON WA 98057 182305-9211-04 182305-9211-04 CURRAN JACK 8 649599 CURRAN JACK 8 649999 10700 MERIDIAN AVE N 11505 10700 MERIDIAN AVE N 1505 SEATTLE WA ! 98133 SEATTLE WA 98133 182305-9253-03 - 182305-9253-03 RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT 54037N9800 RENTON SCHOOL CISTRICT 14037N9800 435 MAIN AVE SOUTH 435 MAIN AVE SOUTH RENTON WA ' 98055 RENTON WA 98055 192305-9027-07 192305-9027-07 PIEROTTI LP 719999 PIEROTTI LP 719999 17034 SE 184TH ST ' 17034 SE 184TH ST RENTON WA ; 98058 PENTON WA 9805E 1 192305-9035-07 192305-9035-07 SOUND FOROIINC C0381 SOUND FORD INC C0381 750 RAINIER AVE S 750 RAINIER AVE S RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98095 ! 192305-9048-02 192305-9048-02 WAL—MART STORES INC 12516 772067 WAL—MART STORES INC ;;2516 772067 PROPERTY TAX DEPT 18013 PROPERTY TAX DEPT 08013 BENTONVILLE AR 72716 BENTONVILLE AR 72716 192305-9053-04 192305-9053-04 DIAMBRI. VICTOR 102311 DIAMBRI VICTOR . 102311 1615 SHATTUCK AVE S 1615 SHATTUCK AVE S RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 192305-9072-01 192305-9072-01 BONNELL FAMILY L L C 639999 RONNELL FAMILY L L C 639999 9631 SE 7TH ST 9631 SE 7TH ST BELLEVUE WA 99004 BELLEVUE WA 9P0C4 192305-9073-00 192305-9073-00 BONNELL FAMILY L L C 639999 BONNELL FAMILY L L C 639999 9631 SE 7TH ST 9631 SE 7TH ST BELLEVUE WAS 98004 BELLEVUE WA 98004 • U'S'“ 0� `Comments on the above epplicati/ be submitted in writing to Ms.Jennifer Toth Henning,Project Manager, Development Services Division,10:c.._s...Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on October 1,1998. If you il I• C� ♦ n have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, A,,A contact Ms.Henning at(425)430-7286. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of •rL Nirr0 record and will be notified of any decision on this project. NOTICE OF APPLICATION CONTACT PERSON: JENNIFER TOTH HENNING (425)430-7286 AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON- I PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION I SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED(DNS—M) DATE: September 18,1998 • • LAND USE NUMBER: LUAL98-139,SA-A,ECF APPLICATION NAME: JACK N.JO'S BEACH BAR&GRILL ' PROJECT DESCRIPTION: John Heehi,Billy McHales Corporation,has applied for environmental review (ECF)and administrative site plan review(SA-A)for a tenant Improvement to an.existing building. The 5,500 sq.ft. building would be remodeled and an entry(vestibule would be added on the north side. Parking for 52 vehicles is proposed.Applicant requests to deviate from parking standards to exceed required parking by six cars. PROJECT LOCATION: • 105 SW 7th Street i OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED(DNS-M):As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. ' Therefore,as permitted under the RCW 43.21 C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS(M)process to give notice That a DNS-M Is likely to be Issued.Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are Integrated into a single comment period.Them win be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated(DNS-M).A 14 day appeal period will follow the Issuance of the DNS-M. j L"1tyae -e 4 1 U PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: ' September 04,1998 �`'' '_•_,, 3' •�i`''ky.. 1s• ?t.,: �- •. ,4-aa:. }lye_ -.+ NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: September 18,1998 '� y'1 �`�• •••'"'[f Permits/Review Requested: , SEPA,Administrative Site Plan,Building 4 ' \\,i d1 e Other Penh which may be required: I Not applicable. �/ --•• ; r A I,s" . �' �,1�p, � 1 .•�.4 fic.le Requested Studies: Modified Drainage Report •7•L'i:t. _„� ^) 1 O - e•, _ Location where application may 1p�/� Vil — l'F. ' be reviewed: Planning/Buiiding/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, gB oo ri, � ;6th Floor,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 ®®. ' i— L...PUBLIC HEARING: No public hearing Is required for this application. °:: _ /���'�',® , CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: ..: l�-' "P Analytical process I ,,....�� �'�/rile Project Employmentyt�.a- • ?ti m Land Use: 1 ct site Is designated.The Area-Commercial commercial end uses .qs Commercial Arterial(CA).The EAC designation permits uses • ¢':-„' i NNSI•-,. y requiring large amounts of land and access to large volumes of auto traffic in �Y �:�:"' " `., areas outside of centers and the downtown.The CA Zone permits eating and `'�' '-'-' ~'Y �fr•1� • drinking establishments as a primary use.The proposal is a tenant- Improvement and slight expansion and generally conforms to the development standards of the CA Zone. Environmental Documents that I I Evaluate the Proposed Project: Project Application Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: The proposal is subject to the City's Environmental(SEPA)Ordinance,Zoning Code,Public Works Standard's,Uniform Building Code,Uniform Fire Code,etc. I Proposed Mitigation Measures: The following Mitigation Measures will likelyjbe imposed on the proposed project.These recommended Mitigation Measures address project Impacts not covered by existing codes and regulations as cited above. 1.Fire Mitigation Fee:The applicant shall pay the applicable Fire Mitigation Fee,equivalent to$0.52 per square foot of new construction.I The fee is payable prior to the issuance of the building permit GENMALOT.n00 IGENMALOT.000 " I CERTIFICATION X 0en,i/ T A/el, y certify that copies of the above document were posted by me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property one "`7` t �d'! �q�$ Siti -d• \.:m0'.. (,rUe+ eMy ATTEST: Subcribed and sworn before me, a Nortary 't , • e an• or e State of j Washington residing � � ,on the � day of !�.- eik4 • f 5 /I/ / alti,�p Ste'j 22�/S 5 . __ i L,I . • . .. . _ . , , .. . . .I MARILYN KAMCHFFF COMMISSION EXPIRES 6/29/99 s:' y o aire 1VT re WATT NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON- SIGNIFICANCE - MITIGATED (DNS-M) DATE: September 18,1998 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-98-139,SA-A,ECF APPLICATION NAME: JACK N'JO'S BEACH BAR&GRILL PROJECT DESCRIPTION: John Hoehl, Billy McHales Corporation, has applied for environmental review (ECF) and administrative site plan review (SA-A) for a tenant improvement to an existing building. The 5,500 sq.ft. building would be remodeled and an entry vestibule would be added on the north side. Parking for 52 vehicles is proposed. Applicant requestS to deviate from parking standards to exceed required parking by six cars. PROJECT LOCATION: 105 SW 7th Street • OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED(DNS-M): As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore,as permitted under the RCW 43.21 C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS(M)process to give notice that a DNS-M Is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated(DNS-M). A 14 day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: September 04,1998 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: September 18,1998 S� V( Permits/Review Requested: SEPA,Administrative Site Plan,Building Other Permits which may be required: Not applicable. Requested Studies: Modified Drainage Report Location where application may be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, 6th Floor,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 PUBLIC HEARING: No public hearing is required for this application. CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: • Analytical process Land Use: Project site is designated Employment Area-Commercial(EAC)and zoned Commercial Arterial(CA). The EAC designation permits commercial uses requiring large amounts of land and access to large volumes of auto traffic in areas outside of centers and the downtown. The CA Zone permits eating and drinking establishments as a primary use. The proposal is a tenant- improvement and slight expansion and generally conforms to the development standards of the CA Zone. Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Project Application Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: The proposal is subject to the City's Environmental(SEPA)Ordinance,Zoning Code,Public Works Standard's,Uniform Building Code,Uniform Fire Code,etc. Proposed Mitigation Measures: The following Mitigation Measures will likely be imposed on the proposed project. These recommended Mitigation Measures address project impacts not covered by existing codes and regulations as cited above. 1. Fire Mitigation Fee: The applicant shall pay the applicable Fire Mitigation Fee,equivalent to$0.52 per square foot of new construction. The fee is payable prior to the issuance of the building permit. GENMALOT.DOC Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Ms. Jennifer Toth Henning, Project Manager, Development Services Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton,WA 98055, by 5:00 PM on October 1,1998. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact Ms. Henning at(425)430-7286. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: JENNIFER TOTH HENNING (425)430-7286 IPLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION ' .u + f,^\tea'.•• WE b�: ��iM H jam' 'b�� •. � ,`'��•.\\ � ,• � , y ... •,, — . _... _. .5 , I:• . m°1.,...tt:' I—P �m .a Y i000000000 . 1 L/• -'. n, VAN,..Ingi Ill Eintl :- 5 L GENMALOT.DOC c: ill CITY OF RENTON ..iLit% Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator September 18, 1998 Mr.l John Wojtacha Restaurant Space Design 15935 NE 8th Street, B101 Bellevue, WA 98008 • SUBJECT: Jack n'Jo's Beach Bar&Grill Project No. LUA-98-139,SA-A,ECF Dear.Mr.Wojtacha The Development Planning Section of the City. of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on October 06, 1998. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. Please contact me, at (425)430-7286, if you have any questions. Sincerely, • oth Henning Pro'ect Manager cc: R.A.M.A.C./Owners .. Bill McHales Corporation/Applicant ACCPTLTR.DOC 200;Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 . 11111111111111k ....... ..... ...... .. •n:::.•w::::w•.:nv::x:yv:?',..•;v;:.}•:.v:.;.••:::...{•.::vv:•:;;...,.., .;,..;.;.\\+t3:...ti'{'+':{+ti:ti{3+3:{'•}`:?{t•:{{!•:3}•;:•:•••i:{{"{':{'::::'}}'3•{::. +rx+,...... .r•:} •r.•}S. }� Y.:.• '• :.f:}.:}S}r}.},:h4.,y rU. ...Sr}}TR:..,............. ...4,::Y.}..::!?:>.::i>i:;}.vrfv{:::•>i+Y>}4•y;r.r' :`Y....l 'kM:i•. T S§ •:x{..h-.nv:n♦s t•w }..x .ri.)is;f is•�{r•;{•`?ir}Y::.:::iir:::•:. Y:::4., ...L r.r+.2...; ;r,.:.<,....�;.., .,t;f:: .:E::: ..f• .�::: •!):.t:..;.:. ..}:,.`.v •�,;£+,`.,•::.t�,i{.. �t'k�f,:. S�{:S?t••.#.,!. ,..{.. .•sSt .o'i'1+ )• x•,.. .{.?CC•„R.. .:3•r.,>'^•:: }>.?... ..t.{{{{;.;:{,{3}x•:. : �' :•. L:•,•... t3' :::••::::f ::.... fr:•,{{{c{•r:?•:F:vtt+tti•6 C..I". a�, .+##2!�{, ..3.{ :..:: .. ..}},.,:. �yf � IX?r+{2-f.?{•KL .:r.?{K•:�{;r' ......,,.. .... :.. \.., : {� „�{. +t�{::•.`F,:t+;r:.r<.k:.. ,L;. .n.!;:..}4.::::.:+.{.<;`.•:5'iS:S•':::';::::::}-:•r:?•::........::� r:,<:<SrSSS: .;{Y..::Y. {�•.,,,. r. :.v}:L..;.? •.,•.. }.n .. .f,. •... 1.:v:•: ..{.,� ••.Y• §:....{}..,. :• .. 0.,:.ri :S•r:r..... igo.::i i C;.. R:{.::::::. ...n.... ?C v .. ,.. i. ..5`'•}S.}.x .Tr : .r .. ... .,{vv,?.n ... ,..'{K?:n:::::•:v , .. ,v .. ... � {..;v..{ 3.,;.....:{.'•... , �t vi../.. :..�v.J ..Y.'th v �}}• r.�., v,�r.Y i } Y:x:v(� ••v�, r>Xtr}r•:•rr}:•riY:•i}}ii'i�iiit{}i S?�:+ft3}}v.:•:: :,rr:}•Y•t••{v .v.{ :.{G.:..;L: •.?•�'•: ..J.nC :.h..:v .1. v..'�:..j�.i••.{ti..:rSv:.#t:.2$,lF,{Yrr�{^f:�n}:?•:�/;,v,{v. .'T.FS,•.. ...{..... :.Jr r2... .:Y `S.r., ..f.....,, ... ... .+.,t. ..:.Y:,. ,.......,x.... .. ,. .. rk::.nv:r::rvA:S ... .r. ... #. .,..<?...'t...:f `,t...f... .......,.. ....r}.i....... ':• :--..::n•r.a., ,f� n.... ., r .'i,...... .. .. .?`. .,,... •J..... Sr:^\:v;.}:?+nx:!•A:3:?Sr:•}:t•is'{v>•}i:�$iir?•}::•}:•v,:i:+ •{i$}}ii•. . ..,t.,..h<,,,Y'`R:}.'Y.................rr........}.;�;:::.,k,{..r.•n...:. ..... ..,.....r:.•::.,.Srk.x.:+^•.. ... ...... .. ... ..t'C�.t..:!......t:....,....... ,....... ,•?ti�::;:;:: � ;;•,•}:;:it;::: ....n,..• ..... n. .\.... ..... ...vJ:..f.J............. ......:......::...v..r...mS..r... �... ..� .. �1�`>}%t{!:3:•:M .rrr%.?•}}h n. ..rY.+•:<n ...{..n..., .. ....: }..Y.:r: .. ......vi........t......., �. .. .�...... ....... ...............................w:..} ..... ,...is:i'#i.:S:•iT' ...•..}....r.;..>.v?+.+.•.Si,vA..Jf.,hht...,. ,......n..,y.r r....::;:x:.., r:........ •.:v::::::.v:... -. F.•. ••• ........r.., , ............if n......... ........ ...,,:.......... .........v.......;...........•;...............Sn•:•::::v:••.v:::•.`v:r::::3nv.3:}r:•iii:i:is{•}r:S•:........ :}}:+. •, ..' � ' .........vvv:::::•:�:•. ....:....v.....,....v. ...:?•:v:::.+:v:nv?•r}:•r:•r}:•}T:•.v............ ................:..•.;..................;:.. ....:.}:..........}....... .....:.... 5 •3:?w::••..; ... ]P..:v:. ::::::xw;;rrr:w...n...::+: ..... tr:;.:..•...:. .:...........,v . :... ....... ,:....n ..rf... ... ...:i+........r.....::....... .....!fin x.....::::w.v::rr�:• .; ..:.:x.n,;n•:x::,....,. :...n.. .... ..... ...... ...: :. .<: + ' ':?:.r•.r:if'c'{:iig i?iifi'f:.o.:4T::?:{r•:::t•r:.v{:..i.ve.:::.:. � ` ..,.,..........,.... . ...', :::•:::•:::::•.inn.....................••. .....:,.r:::::- •�''' :. ..:. ... ... ....... r..i. :ff!...n......:............. ............... ..... E.T}:�ERVtCES?:DE'.;l tV*i*: :>:JY ?+Y:3:{n}:}}{i::,:»:<:>:>::>:::>:::> .:. :..04i.: ..tt.....;.:}•:...,•• :.:::..{.:{:+:.:..:,..: :........ .................;......:,,......,.:....::.vn.:::: ...BE�fEE.Q.PM..�..:.........:.:.::..:.... Y St.Q::.n.:.�:.... . .. . ..............n.r..:Yn ....... .. ...v .r......:,,:,:.,,:,: ...v..... .... .:.{r.{..n...v...........v: r: , .. .v...,r,{.•n.v::.:,• ::r:.v:i, •::,,t: fvp..v:::.� f,C. ':v:<SF ':i, ..n.- ... \..........::.v...:{•.:.:::•:w::..n.: ::•n1..,.......... 2'. .:. ... n... ..v....t..... ...v.. ..,. .. �. `�� ..:...::::.: .:�.•.ve�?.��•.'�Aw•�...... ...... .,...{..v.... ..... ...n-}4x n.vv::fv. n.......v. N:.. :.•Y.vr/e,.':JY ::.. .....v... ...„......:...„, n....f•.r......n.....„,„....•:..• :::nr:.-�.•.... J•••.v•.... .r.n, .�.::.:-.::: ....:..... . ........v......... ......n..n.. ..:.......•............ .. v:.:....,..n....r. wnnx..v?...v... n..x:J:,.T..nv.3:..n............n.., ........6n{v:},:. :::Y{•} ..v. .............v........ .:..........n....v.v................ :...: :v: ...... {.. ...f•::•:.•.. ....... ,::i{{;:.v:.....;.y.;,•}}:;:}�Y•i:•Sri:v;.........�. .......... .......... ....nn{.......r.................r .v....,....{::.........n............,.. n ;..... ,::.}:.}.}:::}:rx.�'.?:+•}: ti:3;,.��.. .......,. .: ...ry .n. ::....n.......-...,•v. :v-.......,..:.....r.........n.,.. ........-:•+:::: ...... .. r... . :`-:: m::. ...........n., :rb:.::\•r}}::3:•YSn.. ..... ..........n........,:...... .. x..:................. .: ....v............ .... ......r............. n....n:+n,.....r rn....... $@ v.r........ :..:: :: ..}.:::.}}r}S:i : • ........v...n..r....... ?}n.v. v.......,.............{..... .... ...,..f...... ..+. ..,.......... ::::: ....:... ::: .. M•:•:.:?{?:y...;.:.... .............{/.. r. ..v...r ....v............ .... ...x.. .v.... v....,:. w. ..•.}.v:::...4. .. ........ : .:...... .....n. viva ........... .. n.v.n{+.. ........r,........ ... . ...v..r..... ..n...........x.....,. r .... ..A. ....r: r...::.:.•..•::•::Y:}'3:{}:'•:::,:}:{•:F3}i:3:;Ji .... n............• .:....... .F. .v........... ...... \.Y....\........... . .....::..v.f.•.. ......l...v ......T\. .r:}J.. ..}...v.......... :.... :..Fin...........r:....... ...... :..:.:.......... ..:.;{:.;.v:.:.v. ....... ..n...n.. .. ............. .. ...v.. .. .... v.v.v?Cn.., ...r{. �'v -,v.v::::::-.::. ..:v:::?.:}}:i}v:"v:::::f:{. ... ....,..............................x .......... v........ v:::i iii}:ti+i:+ii ......... ...:,........,. ............................,...•r::.......:...n•.....r.rr..xn... .....r......r......r u.r:..r.J•:•:•.:rr.::n•:::...i.{.....:,}:...:-}}:{{{y.;:;. :?}•.:.. ..... •-.yV• ..�.,:•::.;•};.;.;. "'�v,...vr v... v .. ..fin #. .n.rrr .......:::w:.:....•.:..:.::r...T},.n...........m:w::::::nr�:{::{•} .. .:• :.:. :. ...: .::. :..{. ..+{, .. :..::nv::::::•.::.....:...�:::::.:-:i}:{}:•i:{3+?+•i••}}:vv}}ii:?¢?{v}i:}Y.J .....• .:....:.r:v.w::n::•.n,{.:'{{.r i:.3::b,i•:•:ti:•r::{•:: .n••. ........}r............r....\........}... ...W.. .......................f................. ..n...... .v........................::••..•:m:1?•.vb.....ti...:n•:?.•:,,,,v:n.v:n•: v: � :w: :: . v r w:.+:n:{.;i..: .:....n:: ::::fi.,v::::::::::::::::;•;n•::n•.� :• •r•:+v:::..... ........ ......:::Sri}}:{3:•rr}}'.;ti: ....n... ............... v.....,..... ............................. ...: ... .....w:.::;.,v;}::r-.}.:}::.wnv.3:::::::::::.,::vnri?.,•::n•{{::.}v:::::::::.:v: • ..............:......v...v... vnn.,...,...... 3.. ............. ........... ................:.....w;}:4r'??vr:•. ..•:n::v:.3:\.:::::::............. .......................::::••..x..::..:..:.::;.v w::v:.v ::. .... ....+--f.,;"'.'::v:?: ::?........v.::- ....:}}::....: .v4. •:+:: :•:. :r:w:::r::•;.:••::::r::::n•:::.v•.::v:.:.:.n.....;;r.. n• .:.xxv„v.xv.:;.;;,::.. .v.m x-•:{•::.gin•::.::.:::.v. :•t Yy. n:f:...%•:.xr.....:. ,..:v,......v::.•:..... \.:::}:::..... ....... ..}...\n-::::}}i}};.{,};:f.3:3}i:•i}:{{•:i:i--, :.:........:...,:.::•;:vn'•:<•}}.3.'r{:{3}Y:+,vn,,• v{.}:[.}T:}�Kt.3 :::........... ...:.}....:{{{,..}. .::1?}.:4: .„. .... .,.,„.::•:::•::{n}..,..• .fnf.,•::^::..::$5.v:::•::......�,„.::*:.i:v::::nv:.v...!.w::n::•::::: ;:v• :i'i ........ .....\..:.......:.:..v.......................:�::..:v;•v:+3'3::{S:Srr:?3};{.}Y:{..::::::::::•: :.:..r.•. . .::.:n...... ......:...:,,. .::....:J:::nv:::::::•:: .................:::•r:`v. •>:�: �...: ".is ........:..:::n..v:r•.••.v{•.n•...... ...................n........:.::::: .:..•.: .:.. .: ..............x.r..........n J nv;•:-.......::mv::nvi•.,,.::.v..:v..;:. ......v................v..�•.{:r%.v.:v:::nv::::nv.::::�v: ......;:• �::if ...r...... ......}?r}}r}iY::.v:t.�•.vv:::.:•.v�.•.v:1 4.:v.:v:{:.:::.:....................n,..vv...••::,•;f:•:n.;.:.:::;n:••:.,..:....n n•. vh.,.,.;. • .::::::n...::::::n::::.::::.::.:n..::::::.:n..:::::::n:.})i::.v:3::}.v}.{3::•;}N:ER:3}:r :•jiir?iir:vii}:•rr:i:i}? {rii:r.:}{3:};::;:i•:t}?}TTr};.;,}i:}:is3:{!i•::;:i::j{iY.:}i•<..:::::.:u.}•.:::N.r::..}:}::r::::.}?ii}r}}i}:{:i:_r: :inv?•i}}:3;{{•}}Y?{•}}:•r'}r:r}}r}}:•}}::.:n.:.:...:..:...:..:.. ::' .. ::?•}r}:•rr:y::.:::�v::::::{:<Sr:::}::}i}} {•}}r:3r':r}}}}}r:?:ir:::{Ov;{:•r:•: '.:}r:r}:•:}:{ '.A1}3%:.{••r: :vOti:i i::ijin}: E r T::t. /1T10 YP. >JC N :..o. ::»ff;..he[e.?f9::.mor...e;tha t or e:;)e et<Owner> t gs a tact ddit a al• . :.natanzed�Ma§ieFaYpplicati'or�.fo�`®acf `Qw ,............: .............. w::.:3:....... PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: • NAME: N+/S E. . . ��� JACK I��I S (�^� �r 71�+ �t LL PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRIESS(SS))+/LLOOCATION: .- ADDRESS: • 10)I (9 34-14% ✓T I D� W �iT")` �6, • CITY: t_ ' )A 4/\i: S SO�� KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): 1 • TELEPHONE NUMBER: EXISTING LAND USE(S): I:21.ETU 425 2 4i c)o) t c [ 21io,si._ GSA) r:<;:::k>:::;i:::: :. .:{{.AP:PL1GA:Nitf:al �er<<# <ovine t 1 �J PROPOSED LAND USES: r NAME: V O1-t NI F- OE- I-1, 1 COMPANY(if applicable)!: EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: -ill -`( MG 14/ 4-F-s c. P t M P`-ao`f MPIT- At2 A • C kU'g12CAl T 1' ADDRESS: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): C�51i p � fD 208 PROPOSED . • CITY: . I ZIP: EXISTING ZONING: . &1� TUB iL.,q/WA. . cb 1 ��SitNG ONIIFI- (CA) • TELEPHONE NUMBER: i ' ,,`y,ir:;:;" • — �/2 PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): :<.:{{i3••>rr;>:'•r:;Yi:{.}r:r:3}}}:.:�Yi:;;•}.;�r}:>•:;::i::ii::::«<{iz:isi:<:.ri:::<:}•.»ii:r;:{?{:iii::r;::: .......................... >`PE -S:O:iu `> '>'{ > > ? >>>>>` -c'1' SITE AREA (SQ. FT. OR ACREAGE): NAME: . °'�y =1 /t£0; . -'. .�J.044 .`°:U) TAC 4A 3 Gb/-7[—J a 6F • 7- COMPANY(if.epptical3le)i)i,ij .b;•`' PROJECT VALUE: {alto.:r.. ADDRESS: �� � �F Olig: 1®� IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? i NO CITY: • j ZIP: •• \iU2 0,LA ' IS THESITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY ///�//�y� //,�(��/�//�� /✓���/J676, SENSITIVE AREA? �r•1 Gn11�111•.111\IPfGIn. /[ /P/, w (/TI / — ✓ L N� , . ;IIz<,2,;a><o7c:;::S:i;::,.r:.;..;::.,. ;a:•.:.:.may..:.... ,.;:•:w::;;::::: lli • XpAc Q ......................... ............................. • • • --`t- 1.' 5 fir' -t= r-4 -cam -r— P 2WA3 i fist- 5 .PS-1- ► iTl� i ass PrIc:0-`t • • tessignminquom:.t..::.y::::.::...........::::::::::....... . ..,.....:.........,..: .:....,.he.c:.kt..:ll ap..1.(:catiocr31 ; <;h t:;. y.....;. e,.....;•:::::.:::y::.:•:>: :::.:.::;;.:>::ty:::::::•:::-: . ... P,.....:,.:..,.:..;.:.,:�Yp�et.;� �t:<�!PP�Y::-CE..: ::>s�af.:f:�>If1.;: . r ::>::>:;:::;<:.:.;:::t:::::«:<::»:«:.;:.:.;�.::<:>::>::>.,... : . : �!.::::::.,.:.:.,t:::.;:::tt;:alete:::!m►.R:e:fees..;::�:::::::»<:::;;»>:<:::>r:::::::::>:<:::::<::<:: >-. ANNEXATION $ SUBDIVISION: _COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT $ —REZONE $ _LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ —SPECIAL PERMIT $ _SHORT PLAT $ —TEMPORARY PERMIT $ _TENTATIVE PLAT $ _ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ _ PRELIMINARY PLAT $ SITE PLAN APPROVAL $-- — FINAL PLAT $ _GRADE & FILL PERMIT $ • (NO. CU. YDS: • . ) • ' PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ —VARIANCE $ (FROM SECTION: ) _ PRELIMINARY —WAIVER $ FINAL ' ' _WETLAND PERMIT - $ — _ROUTINE VEGETATION • MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ MOBILE HOME PARKS: S. • — BINDING SITE PLAN $ SHORELINE REVIEWS: - _SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ _ CONDITIONAL USE $ _VARIANCE $ EXEMPTION $No Charoe n ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ 6,0 _ REVISION $ ..........................:....................... I, (Print Name) Sit-1 rL/5l 4,.r1k,<- /lam, v • - IiN� ,declare that I am(please aback one the owner of the property involved in t ' e /rd the authorized representative to act for the property owner(please attach proof of authorization), end that the foregoing k�,,a4 ip t,p a 194�4f contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge 911:d. i .. 6 J� .,,, herein 4� �� P' i) IR4M4 fmann- � /IV< crean sworn to ef :inaid( fo�he State of LtJ� residir� ���w (Name 0 ner/Reps s t' ) :�- %/ J-9 ��9 , onths= '.da Uf3a1 Sepf. 19�f• 'y • Ccc/. ,9 (Signature of Owner/Representative) �_ G®� jcti AS�\ \� '(S na a Nota ublic) >adlydii t91t11g1ti11!�� (T.h... s c i. ::r..t:.:..: .ry.::: :.:.::::.;::.;:;•y;::::::.�::::.::::: .......... ...oin 1.:;.:::<::::;>::•::::::>..t;<: :: ' {vr <: > > �"��` > � � �' > .....:.::::::::::::.....::::: .:.:�. .:..t:t:.:.;,.:::::..:�..:.,�.: .:..:... ..:: :.:.:;.;� .... ..Staff.. .. .;.;;.::.:;.>:.::;:..::...:...::: :Cit...File..N.umb . ... .. •. . . . f:.::.:.:..:.. •.:t>.;:• ;:•••:::;: .::;.;:::....::•:;:.:;:;::::.:>::::>::<:.;:::::.:;;..;,::::;: lateiiii :>.>:MF1.F'�.:::.:FPta:.>::::F:::.::::;:.;::.:.: : _ .::: :•. :::: .::.:.. :...:.:.;::.: :..:: : :::.:::...:.......::::.:::: t•;.;•.;.: .::•:•:•:;;; ::t.:.�.:::::.::,,:::.::. ::>:«:::::>:::<::>::::>:;<<::: : :>;:::.�.;..:::.�:::; .;•:.�:.:.:.:;:;:.�:;::.:�•.;;:.:.�..;:. .... ........ _ ...... . .E .... ........ ..... .. .... •:.::•:•;;:•;:::::::,•::: :•::.:;• :i;OTAI.:•:E :.:.; •:...:'iir...: ::.:•:•: :::.:.::. . :.: :.: ......... :. . MAS ::: :: ::•>:.:.:.;...•.;:•??:::»r:a:;:>zi?::'#:::::»:>:t>:•:;i::c>:s":3:::%:«z%» C« »:<::si:>:> :: TERAP.DOC REVISED 8/97 .. ....... ..:. .::::•::::::•:::::.�:: .::.::•:.:::�:•: :. REST ANT , , , SPACE DES G N,, INC. PROJECT NARRATIVE 7th The project address is located at 105 SW Street in Renton, Washington. It will be � located',in the former Burger King building which is approximately 5,500 square feet. The current site is not functioning as a business while the proposed restaurant drawings are being developed. The site is void of any special ground features. It is our intention to remodel the one existing structure and add an entry vestibule on the north side for our main entrance. The name of the new restaurant will be JACK AN' JO's BEACH BAR AND GRILL. This will be a casual, theme fish concept reminiscent of many coastal fish restaurants throughout the southeast. We wish to note that the project will incorporate the use of weathered materials, in the form of logs, heavy ropes, planking, siding and galvanized metals to help capture the theme of this concept. Landscaping will play a major role in helping us to achieve a"coastal" feel. We will maintain the existing palm trees on the east side of the building and add native grass and small shrubs accented by colored flood lights. The maximum height will be 20'-0" at the added entry vestibule. The site will have 52 parking stalls with adjacent parking available. We have included handicap van and car parking'per ADA. REQU25T phRKTW6 M O0 CA-tl on/ TO ALLOW 5-2 TOTAL_ PA-RKT '( 5Pptce5, W►t LE cope wooL,D 'RtQv2RE 4C sPkc.ES, DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON SEP 0 4 1998 ECEVED suite .,.i)I •, i,0s. • ,�„ f� J)i, `s_.', ;ice .�. _ .:� •,_:)_c.�i^�1 • • .•..:. ' .:: l OF... .............. ................ ........................... TY NT qommignognismiNgefliiiiinigianagankii ::«:>:::::DEVELOPMENT:SERVIC:.::.::::::::::::.:::::::::::::................................. ...........:... .::::::::::::. .:..... .. .... . .. .. ... LISTMMJMWMO ......::::::............ i}:rjii?iij:iSi:;:ii}i:-iiiiii:+.J}ji:CL.i?i:�iii::?:ii:i:}!?:^:•ii: :<ii::}•iiii • isM?iii;i:;:•--:! `:�iii:};:v;:,:i�i:iii:-:i:}.}iii:::i::::::i:::::{iiiiiiiiiiiii:•$j ?:ii:}:ii:iiiii:ioiy:;:,v,;iiii'rrii}?:ii?:i'ii:ti+:Jjiij?iiiii::::)iiiii??:tiSi{'ryj:{:ii PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: • The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a,proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this.checklist is to provide information to help you and the 'agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can . be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. - INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of. your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to'the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or"does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. • The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be • significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply."•IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). • For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. 3EVa.0- !T CITY uF R i5iTO J UP 0 1 3 RE 7!vE Environmental Checklist A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: . _ ,JAG<< AR'Jets- Bakal falZll.l._ 2. AeP n of applicant:�L 3. Address and phone nunter of applicantand contact.person: 1' Nt '5 ST i W ,0 L I� 2.C2G) 5(212. -niz) 4. Date checklist prepared: 5. Agency requesting checklist: c rf q 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): - 5Qiztt•lli. i tc/A, • 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion,or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. NO 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. • NoN V-NovuN 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. NON 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. S—pA /13U1U7I is 2i(( l ; HoV.m Der , 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. a\IA1 i ON TO aigST t 1‘11 REST gANY DUIImo% IN/ -- A DDi NCI 96 Sr- of l NT kee_ �� (V4E46.11451z. Vg TcT3ULE) Environmental Checklist 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. 1STI N 4 Cif S1T ST ' 4 t�Z QCN . b. Ground Water:' • - • 1) Will.ground--water .;be wyithdra�yn, orywill•wateri ",dischajged:to:.ground..water? Give . .;general description,purpose, and'approzimate quantities if known. 2) :.:.:..Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic.tanks or other sources, if any (for.example: •Domestic sewage;:industrial,� containinglhe=following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general•size-of the'system,ihe-number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. NC NE c. Water Runoff(including storm water): • • 1) - Describe..the source of runoff (including storm water)...and:method• of.collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known): Where will this water flow? ..Will this water flow into other waters, If so, describe. jiNCi OTCSt1 STG 1V%l/�W �-C�JriON. s`tS- r[�i 2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters?..If so, generally describe. NO d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: IST1 t4 S1ST i 4. • PLANTS • a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: SC deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other ')( evergreen tree:fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs - grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? NcNE 5 Environmental Checklist c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Nr It d. . Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance - vegetation on the site, if any: - • 7(15Ti M G -nZ:-S 4 . 51-1re0 s Tr.__C?1AI \tv lT14 At:D 1-114N d (.ts.N t7SGA,P ' CR-Js NTS �5. ANIMALS � • a. :. •• Circle any birds and animals which have been observed.on-or-nearthe:site:or•are known ttoo rbeeoon,or near the site: (see next page) . . Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other MCNa. Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other NC.1t= Fish: bass, salmon,trout, herring, shellfish, other I CNE— . b. -List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: 4O • 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES • a. What kinds of energy electric atural gas, il, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy n escribe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. —Tc NI 4 b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. NO c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: C°:'fit F � � Vv M+ WA54. DTI U LAT 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 6 • • Environmental Checklist h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: NCNB • 2. AIR • a. : ••What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e.;dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and.when the project is completed? If -:any,-generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. cGC:V-4 O ICc . • b. • Are there any off-site sources of emission or odor that-may-affect yourproposal? If so, • generally describe. NO c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any:1 3. WATER a. Surface Water. 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year- . round and seasonal streams;saltwater,•lakes, ponds,-wetlands)?•if yes;describe type and provide names. If appropriate,state what stream or river it flows into. NOWE 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. • NO 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. • N ;N 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. . �tD 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year flood plain? If so, note location on the site plan. 4 Environmental Checklist 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and • -range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if • reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not :_::required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General descri tion of the site (circle one) flat, oiling,,hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is% the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?)/U c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay,sand gravelkpeat,: muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify t em a • •te any prime farmland. NO VA2NL A ND d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. UN,KNtJVt11� • e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. • f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. . NO g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 80 '- 3 • Environmental Checklist a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. • 2) . •Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: NONE b. Noise 1) .What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? 4E 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example:_traffic,-:construction,. operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: C'NS 1&CTi 1-CLYCZ5 To NC 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent roperties? 12ESi T f2A.NT - b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. NO • c. Describe any structures on the site. elAST11• -a jRA01.- • d. Wiill``anny structures be demolished? If so, what? e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Cct4MhEgc-tAL A42,--m2.I.AL (CA,) f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? CD II�t CifIDEs4mAtTic.N Environmental Checklist g. If applicable,what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? • h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. i. -Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? to j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? N � k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing:and .projected land uses and plans, if any: N _ 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. NONE. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. SO 0\ 'N,u--. 1- '�G,t-�� l'> _Docr3-5i Dip44 IPcNY_Si 141Wit...Pcait C� b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? C. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: 8 Environmental Checidist 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? • b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard Or interfere with views? c. •. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect.your proposal? NONE d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: NONE 12. RECREATION a. Whattddesignated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? NE b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses?=.If so, describe. NONE c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts.on.recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: NONt 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION • a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. NO b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural``��importance known to be on or next to the site. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: NONE: 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. S 74'31 S i -- 1ZIL NC R ANE --�. l f 2s Ti: 4uN 4165 • Environmental Checklist - b. - Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? "S e: 0 • c. .. How many parking spaces would the project completed have? How P many would the project eliminate? i4►NCI S,QAc s gl-I A It.IA,T5 ) d. • •.-Will the proposal require any new roads or streets,-or:improvements-to.existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally,describe:(indicate whether-public or private? e. Will the project use (or occur in •the immediate.-.:vicinity=of)._water, :rail, or air tansspportation? If so, generally describe. • f. • How many.vehicular•trips per day.would•be'generated•-by..the completed:project? If • • known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: 15. PUBLIC SERVICES • a. , Would the.project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care,schools, other)? If so, generally describe. NO b. Proposed measures to reduce orcontrol direct impacts on public services, if any. NONE. 16. UTILITIES a. ' - ut'. .- - • - • - .-' __ - at the site: lectricity natural gas, water, efuse- service, -lephon=, anitary sewer septic system, P 10 Environmental Checklist b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. N.O t • Ll T1 C. SIGNATURE .I,.the:undersigned,.state.that to the best.of my knowledge.the Jabove:information is:true and . complete.. .:It:is:understood.that the lead agency may::withdraw.•any...declaration -of non- -:significance that it might:issue in .reliance:upon -this•checklist_should there:be .any willful :misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. • Proponent: 191 . Name Printed: S .1°ki'°9-if‘,t:12- Date: 9- 4 -9 8 • • • • 1; Environmental Checklist • - D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEETS FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS • hese:,.;sheet Should::onl ::be;AISO<:foc actions.Involvin gdecisionCtit tiiiiicies �: laps::::>and Cr Y .9. .:::=::.p.. programs.:::> :ou,. o:no,::nee O.: ll .out<t ese.:s sets:. or:project:a ion .::.:;::.;::.:::.: iimpp::::.in:].:.::zi:i!i . ...,Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the • list of the elements of the environment. . \.:. ..-;.When answering these questions, be aware of the•extent.the•proposal;-or-.the types of activities • - •- -likely.to:result from the proposal, would•affect the item at a greater intensity or at a:faster to ••• .. :.than if the proposal were not implemented.• Respond briefly•and in general terms. . •.1. :: 'How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge.to.water,•:emissions to.ai .production, . . ..;storage,.or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production.of•noise? /.• _. . .. • . Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: . 2. • How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals;lish, or marine life? . Proposed measures to protector conserve plants,-•animals,.fish,:or.marine•life are: / %, 3.. • • How would the proposal be likely\to,deplete energy or natural resources? • Proposed measures to protect oRconserve energy and natural resources are: . 4. How wpul the proposal be likely to use or\affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas . designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild,,-nd scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, • tlands, flood plains, or prime farmlands? . Proposed measures to protect such resources or to\avoid or reduce impacts are: .. \ 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: 12 :I lei ail C 9419 S. 204 PLACE' ,KENT, WASHINGTON.'98031. PHONE (253)'850.0934- FAx (253) 850-0:155:- ' - .°:September 3, 1998. JACK AND=JO'S: BEACH BARANIXGRILL 10.5 SW 7th STREET - MODIFIED DRAINAGE.REPORT, PREPARED FOR:, -:Restaurant.Space'Deesign" John Wojtacha I f ` 1'5935 NE 8th St.;Suite-B,-101 • Bellevue, Wa. 98008. 1425)'649-9766 PREPARED.BY: O 1 ,' �� 'James Jaeger, P.E:" ti STATEMENT OF NO NEW NET IMPERVIOUS SURFACE The subject site is an existing Burger King restaurant site that has recently been permanently closed. The site is at the southwest corner of the intersection of Hardie Ave. SW and SW 7th St. The proposed new restaurant will utilize the building shell from the Burger King with very little changes to the shell. The existing parking lot will primarily stay the same as it was for the Burger King. One of the driveways will be converted to handicap parking with some.additional landscaping. A small portion of the existing paved area will be converted to landscaping and a small `portion of the existing landscaping will be converted into parking. The total site area is 39,750 SF. The existing impervious surface is 30,694 SF. The proposed impervious surface will be 30, 609 SF; for a net decrease in impervious surface of 85 SF. The existing surface water drainage system within the parking lot will remain the same. If necessary, additional catch basins will be added to low areas and connected to an existing catch basin. The roof downspouts from the building will be connected to the drainage system. No new street frontage improvements are expected, except for the reconstruction of the portion of the sidewalk where the driveway is being removed. JUL-16-98 12 :26 PM RESTAURANT. SPACE. DESIGN 2066499750 P. 02 JUL•16.68 09:57 From:KARR TUTTLE .AMPBELL 206-682-710? T-ali? POP/08 Job-822 Amkkf� '1 014eiho . `rstAmerican ride insurance Company SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE • ORDER NO. 375668-5K LIABILITY; $1,000.00 FEE: $200.00 TAX: $17.20 . FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, aY �EXCLUSIONS corporation, herein called the Company, SUBJECT TO THE LM AND LIMITATIONS SET FORTH BELOW AND IN SCHEDULE A • GUARANTEES 1(ARR TU'>('T'LE CAME?BELL . herein called the Assured, against actual loss not exceeding the liability amount staled above which the Assured shall sustain by reword or any incorrect:An to the assurances sct forth in Schedule A. LIABILITY EXCLUSIONS AND LIMITATIONS I. No guarantee is given nor liability assumed with respect to the validity, legal effect or priority of any matter shown herein. 2. The Company's liability hereunder shell be limited to the amount of actual loss sustained by the Assured because of reliance upon the assurance herein set forth, but in no event shall the Company's liability exceed the liability aiuount set forth above. • 3. This guarantee is restricted to the use of the Assured for the purpose of providing title ovideuce es may be required when subdividing land pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 58,17, R.C.W., and the local regL:latiooaa and ordinances adapted pureuant to said statute, It is not to be used s, a basis for closing any transaction affecting title to said property. LiLV !of i' , N i F �_ CITY OF REk!TC:,, SEP 04 ice'3 F:CE ED Pagg 1 WA-97 (5/95) JUL-16-98 12 :27 PM RESTAURANT. SPACE. DESIGN 2066499750 W. 03 JUL-16 , 09:66 Frcm;!fARR iUTTLL'. _..:':BELL 206-662-7100 T-85•. P 09/03 Job-B22 suBDrvisroN GUARANTEE ORDER NO. 37566E-SK SCHEDULE A 'The assurances referred to on the face page are: A. Title is vested in: RA:MAC, INC.. A'WASHINGTON CORPORATION B. That accordlAs to tba Company's title plant records relative to the following described Yea1 property (including those records maintained and indexed by name), there are no . other documents affecting title to said real property or any portion thereof, other than those shown below-under record matters. The following Matters are excluded from the coverage of this guarantee_ 1. Unpatented mining claims, reservations or exceptions In patents or in acts authorizing the issuance thereof. • 2. Water rights, claims or title to water. 3. Tex Deeds to the State of Washington. 4. Documents pertaining to mineral estates. Description: TEE EAST 170 FEET Op TH3 9OUTTt 265 rEsx OF THE NORTH 300 PRET OF COVERNIaNT LOT 1, IN SECT/ON 19, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANG 5 EAST, W.M. v IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTQN; EXcvDT TUE pORTION EASTERLY OF THE WEST MARGIN OF HA,RDIE AVENUR SOUTHWEST OOarm AVENUE SoUTE) (COOZ1TYIMED) Page 2 WA-97 (5/95) JUL-16-98 12 :28 PM RESTAURANT. SPACE. DESIGN 2066499750 P. 04 JUL-15-98 09:58 From:KARR TUTTLE CAMPBELL T06-682-7f00 T-901 P•04106 Job-822 uttlaiso uu• au i4.s ay. r —.. • ORDER NO. 377668-5K • Record Matters : 1. GENERAL A R.I 4'TH EST $BCOI3DSHA:,FT L$SB �BECOMES DELI S DELINQUENT AFTER OCTOBER 31ST• 199E YEAR: AMOUNT BILLED: $14,563.82 . AMotmr1 PAID; NONE AMOtThfl DUE; I1$14,563 .82, ,563 .82r, PLUS 1NTERB9T AND PENALTY. TAX ACCOUNT NO. : 19 2 3 03-9 017-0 9 AgSESaPD VALUE OF LAND : $564,000 .00 ASSESSED VALISE OF IMPROVEMENT; 4536,000.00 2 . pBLrNUUENT GENERAL TAXES. YEAR. - 1997 AMOUNT BILLED: $1i,141.17 AMOUNT PAID: $ 5,570.59 AMOUNT DOE: $ 5, 570.50, PLUS INTEREST AND PENALTY TAX ACCOUNT NO. : 192305-9017-09 3 . L3A9E AND THE TAMS Art CONDITIONS THEREOF AS DISCLOSED BY MEMORANDUM OF LEASE LESDOR; EAWAC, INC., A WASHINGTON CORPORATION LESSEE: BIG FOOT R88VAtTRANT6, INC. , ,A WABEWGTON cORFQRATIOV TERM: COMMIE:ME OM NAY 13, 1977 at SHALL TERMINATE ' OW WRY L3, 1097 DATED; MAY 31, 1977 RECORDED; any 27, 1977 RECORDZNO NO, : 770777090E SAID LEAS', AMONG OTHER THING$, PROVIDES FOR. AN OPTION TO RENEW FOR A PERIOD OF 15 Yl PJ . 4.. UNRECORDED LEASEVOL! S, Ilm ANY, RIGHT' OF VENDORS AND SECURITY AGRREMENT'8 ON PERSONAL PROFERTY, AND RIGHTS OF TENANTS AND SECURSD PARTIES TO REMOVE TRADE FIXTURES AT THE WIRATION OF THE TERM. • .•-�•.� . IS NOT S. CURRENTLY ON LE WITH THE SECRETARY STATE,ORATION FOR CE, AS REQUIRED $Y STATUTE . , 6 . JUDGMENT. • IN FAVOR OF: RIG FOOT RgBTAvxi►>rrs INC. AGAINST: RAMC INC. AMOUNT: $47,142. 62, TO3ETIi&R IPZTH INTBRPIS'T, co9TS AND ATTORNEYS Pus, Iy ANY (CoNTJI tr ) Paso 1 WA-97 (5/95) JUL-16-98 12 :28 PM RESTAURANT. SPACE. DESIGN 2066499750 P. 05 � d c JU1-16-9$ 0$40 Fru:KARR TUTTL, .nmrBEll 206.662•7100 T-801 ?.06/0: yob-822 .... fry',. ORDER NO. 175668-5K ENTERVD: NOVVEMBER 1, 1901 . FILED: HOVER 1, 1991 JUDGMENT NO , : 91-9-23298-0 cAv9u t O. : 9 0-3-13 0 7 0.6 TERANCR LV'CNNS OF tcARR, ATTORNEYFOR JUDGMENT CREDITOR; TUTTLE IT AL 7 . BASIMENV, INCLUDING TERMS A►VD OV I S IOrTS COIF"TAIND THEREIN: . RECORDED; NAY 9, 3.961 RECORDING NO. t 3283.878 IN FAVOR OF; OICRI CITY OF METROPOLITAN SEATTLE FOR:AtdREC'1'3 EAST 30 FEET 8 , EASEMENT, INCLUDING 'TERMS AND PROVISIONS CONTAIN= ' REIN: RICQRDFP: MARC! 7, 1977 RECORDING NO. : 7703070956 IN FAVOR OF: PVGET 90VED POWER AND LIGET COMPANY, A MAMMON CORPORATION FOR: . DEDERSROIMD ELECTR C TRANSMISSION AND/OR DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM ASUCTS: Mil= TSB 8OWE 50 FEET 9. EASEMENT, INCLUDING Tsama AND PROVTSI0NR CONTAINED.TKEREIN: RBCORDSD: MAR 31, 1977 . RECORDING NO. ; 7703310912 IN FAVOR OP: MORT SOUND CPOW IT ANDLIGET COMPANY, A WAOUNGTONFOR; ONDERQROV W tIC TRANEMISSIOE ANO00R DSiTRIEDT2014 1RYsT1X AFFECTS: RhST 15 FEET OF TEN NEST 23 F$I 20 FEN T OP TIENQRTE T 10 . . INDEMNITY AGREEMENT AND TUE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: BETWEEN': BURGER XING RE STAD''RANT AND: CITY ow ammo RECORDED: lidA201 :3, 1977 RECORDING O. 7703230721 REFERENCE TO WHICH $EOULD EN MADE FOR FLTR'Y7i2R PARTICU .ARS . DATED: JULY 8, 1998 AT St00 A.M. 711h1(- 4/tr--- TITLE OFFICER. Page 4 WA--97 (5/95) 7 • CITY OF R tAITON MEMORANDUM JL'L i s "lvJL9iot DATE: 7 4/65 TO: Construction Services, Fire Prevention, Plan Review, Project Planner FROM: Jim Hanson, Development Services Division Director SUBJECT: New Preliminary Application:sAC4\p P--t{ R-- LL,. LOCATION: /05 SW 711" (S7 ee& • A eeting with the applicant has been scheduled for J/.)�, Thursday, t1.c f with, for one of the 6th floor conference rooms (new city hall . It this meeting is scheduled at 10:00 AM, the MEETING MUST BE CO CLUDED PRIOR TO 11:00 AM to allow time to prepare for the 11 :00 meeting. Please review the attached project plans prior to the scheduled meeting with the applicant. You will not need to do a thorough "permit level" review at this time. Note only major issues that must be resolved prior to formal land use and/or building permit application submittal. If you are unable to attend the meeting, please send a representative. Please submit your written comments to 171.301.. at least two (2) days before the meeting. Thank you. • • /1, G���I� f'f 7 71 4 e, 14-7f r m L� CiTYlr�" .mot_Iice. SEP 0 -:t_ 3 ,p 2305--gvi7 • U<CY O� • oa CITY OF RENTON FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU MEMORANDUM DATE: July 27, 1998 TO: Jennifer Toth Henning, Planner FROM: Jim Gray, Assistant Fire Marshal SUBJECT: Jack & Jo's Beach Bar 86 Grill, 105 SW 7th St. Fire Department Comments: I-Separate plans and permits are required for any modification of kitchen hood fire suppression systems. 2. Existing Hood fire system shall be serviced prior to opening. 3. Annual Place of Assembly permit is required from the Fire Department. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. 11 City of Renton InterOffice Memo To: Jennifer Henning n3- From: Kayren K. Kittrick ry Date: August 5, 1998 Subject: Jack&Jo's Beach Bar&Grill PreApplication Review NOTE ON PRELIMINARY REVIEW COMMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS REPORT: The following comments on development and permitting issues are based on the pre-application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision makers;(e.g. Hearing Examiner, Boards of Adjustment,Board of Public Works and City Council). Review'comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by the City or made by the applicant. WATER 1. There is an existing 12-inch diameter water line in SW 7th Street and in Hardie Av S. The derated fire flow in the vicinity is modeled at between 5000 and 5500 gpm with a static pressure of approximately 70 psi. There are at least four fire hydrants in the vicinity that may be counted towards the fire protection of this project, but are subject to verification for being within 300 feet of the nearest corner of the building. 2. The Water System Development Charge would only be triggered if a larger or additional water meter is installed. The redevelopment credits would apply. There is an existing 1-inch domestic meter and a 1-inch irrigation meter on the site. SANITARY SEWER 1. There is an existing 8-inch diameter line in the frontage along Hardie Av S. 2. The Sanitary Sewer SDC is triggered and will be assessed only if an additional or larger water meter is installed. The redevelopment credit would apply. 3. Location and size of any grease interceptor existing or proposed to serve the restaurant must be shown to be adequate for the fixture count and food preparation type. SURFACE WATER 1. No additional impervious surface and no change to the existing system is anticipated by the plans submitted. A limited report/letter verifying no net change to the existing impervious and no apparent existing problems is required. No retention/detention calculation are required for this project. 2. The Surface Water SDC is assessed based on the total new impervious surface square footage as(reflected in the final design. The charge is determined by multiplying the new gross square footage by$0.129. No fee is anticipated. Jack&Jo's Beach Bar&Grill , PreApplication Review 08/05/98 Page 2 TRANSPORTATION 1. The traffic mitigation fee shall be assessed only if additional trips are generated. Credit for the',previous use will most likely result in no fee for the restaurant. 2. Full street improvements including, but not limited to paving, sidewalks, curb &gutter, street signs and street lights are required if not already in place. Any substandard or damaged facilities shall be required to be brought to city standard. 3. All new wire utilities shall be installed underground per the City of Renton Undergrounding Ordinance. If three or more poles are required to be moved by the development design, all existing overhead utilities shall be placed underground. 4. There is no objection to closing one driveway. If possible, the city would prefer closing the driveway on Hardie closest to SW 7th Street as it does not meet minimum set back from the intersection. PLAN REVIEW 1. All plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards which are attached for reference. Also attached for general information are a fee reference sheet and the King County Storm Water standards as adopted by the City of Renton. 2. A construction permit is required for the sidewalk and driveway construction. This may be issued over the counter, or concurrently with the building permit. When plans are complete two copies of the drawings, two copies of the drainage letter, a construction estimate and application fee shall be submitted at the sixth floor counter at city hall. A fee worksheet is attached for your use, but prior to preparing a check it is recommended to call 425-430;-7266 for,a fee estimate as generated by the permit system. CC: Neil Watts • CITY OF RENTON PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: August 6, 1998 TO: Pre-Application File No. 98-63 FROM: Jennifer Toth Henning SUBJECT: Pre-Application Comments for Jack and Jo's Beach Bar and Grill General. We have completed a preliminary review of the pre-application materials for the above- referenced development proposal. The following comments on development and permitting issues are based on the pre-application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision makers (e.g.,Hearing Examiner,Zoning Administrator,Board of Adjustment,Board of Public Works, and City Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by City staff or made by the applicant. The applicant is encouraged to review all applicable sections of the Renton Municipal Code. As we understand your proposal,you intend to convert an existing fast food restaurant into a dine-in restaurant. The project would primarily be a tenant-improvement,but would add a 96 square foot vestibule and canopy. An existing canopy and drive-up window would be eliminated. Some of the existing parking would be reconfigured, and additional landscaping would be installed. Zoning. The project site is zoned Commercial Arterial (CA). Eating and drinking establishments are permitted in the CA Zone. Development Standards. In the CA Zone,for new development,minimum setbacks of 10 feet are required,no rear and sideyard setbacks are required. Heights are limited to 50 feet. Lot coverage is limited to 65%. Lots abutting public streets shall have a minimum landscaping strip of 10 feet, unless reduced through the site plan review process. All landscaping must be irrigated with underground sprinklers. The proposal is essentially a tenant improvement, and meets setback and height standards. A pedestrian connection is required from a public entrance to the street unless the reviewing official determines that the requirement would unduly endanger the pedestrian. Garbage, refuse and recycling areas or dumpsters must be screened on three sides (except access points). Any roof or surface mounted equipment must be screened from view. A lighting plan should be provided with the site plan approval application package, if enough is known about the exterior lighting. A sign plan should also be provided for review. Separate sign permits are required. \\TS SERVERVSYS2\COMMON\H:\DIVISION.SIDEVELOP.SER\DEV&PLAN.INGUTH\PRE-APPSUKJOPRP.DOC August 5, 1'998 Page 2 Environmental Review (SEPA). The proposal would be subject to environmental review since the total area of the proposal,that is, existing development plus the addition,would be greater than 41,000 square feet.: Environmental review could also be triggered through a change of use or addition/paving of area for 20 or more parking stalls. Expected mitigation measures would be payment of a fire mitigation fee for the new construction($0.52/square foot), and payment of a transportation mitigation fee($75 for each new average weekday trip) if applicable. Site Plan Approval. The proposal would be subject to Administrative Site Plan Approval. Issues addressed during Site Plan Approval include the arrangement of project elements including buildings, provision of adequate parking and pedestrian 1access,landscaping, lighting and signs. Parking and Loading. For the restaurant, one parking space for each 100 square feet of gross floor area is required. For the purpose of calculating required parking,gross floor area shall be defined as the main areas of the building that are occupied. It does not include accessory areas ordinarily used by the occupant such as rest rooms, stairs, shafts,wall thickness, corridors, lobbies and mechanical rooms. For an approximate 4,600 s.f. restaurant the required parking would be 46 spaces (before accessory areas are deducted). If the parking lot is greater than 10,000 s.f. in size,then a minimum of 5%of the interior of the parking lot would need to be landscaped in a manner that diminishes the barren appearance;of the parking lot. Minimum width for landscaping planting beds in parking areas is;5 feet. Timing. The combined administrative site plan approval process and environmental review take$ approximately 6 to 8 weeks to complete,provided no additional information is requested and no j appeals are filed. cc: Jana Huenter 17E—CEIVED71 JUL 2 4 1998 MEMORANDUM ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, NE!GH3O HOODS, AND Sf FAr_GIC PLr1T;iNING • DATE: 7/24/00 TO: Long Range Planning FROM: Jim Hanson, Development Services Division Director SUBJECT: New Preliminary Application: JACK- SUS BeXf a C C-L-1.... LOCATION: /(.75- c t0 74/2— c)//'e Please: review the attached preliminary project plans for consistency with applicable Comprehensive Plan Policies. Please submit your written comments to `1q f4 Ir , no later than Thank you. We will not be able to include comments received after this date in the presentation/summary we prepare for the applicant. • **************************************************************** City of Renton WA Reprinted: 09/04/98 14 :50 Receipt **************************************************************** Receipt Number: R9805443 Amount: 1, 505 . 76 09/04/98 14 :50 Payment Method: CHECK Notation: #3491 SMITH BARN Init: LN Project #: LUA98-139 Type: LUA Land Use Actions Parcel No: 192305-9017 Site Address : 105 SW 7TH ST Total Fees: 1, 505 . 76 This Payment 1, 505 . 76 Total ALL Pmts : 1, 505 . 76 Balance: . 00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 000 . 345 . 81 . 00 . 0007 Environmental Review 500 . 00 000 . 345 . 81 . 00 . 0017 Site Plan Approval 1, 000 . 00 000 . 05 . 519 .90 .42 . 1 Postage 5 . 76