Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutEx_02_SEPA_Checklist SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 1 of 12 SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of checklist: Governmental agencies use this checklist to help determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant. This information is also helpful to determine if available avoidance, minimization or compensatory mitigation measures will address the probable significant impacts or if an environmental impact statement will be prepared to further analyze the proposal. Instructions for applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Please answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. You may need to consult with an agency specialist or private consultant for some questions. You may use “not applicable” or "does not apply" only when you can explain why it does not apply and not when the answer is unknown. You may also attach or incorporate by reference additional studies reports. Complete and accurate answers to these questions often avoid delays with the SEPA process as well as later in the decision- making process. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Instructions for Lead Agencies: Please adjust the format of this template as needed. Additional information may be necessary to evaluate the existing environment, all interrelated aspects of the proposal and an analysis of adverse impacts. The checklist is considered the first but not necessarily the only source of information needed to make an adequate threshold determination. Once a threshold determination is made, the lead agency is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of the checklist and other supporting documents. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: For nonproject proposals (such as ordinances, regulations, plans and programs), complete the applicable parts of sections A and B plus the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). Please completely answer all questions that apply and note that the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proponent," and "affected geographic area," respectively. The lead agency may exclude (for non-projects) questions in Part B - Environmental Elements –that do not contribute meaningfully to the analysis of the proposal. A. Background [HELP] 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: 2. Name of applicant: 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: PROJECT LOT UPGRADES AT RYERSON EV 600 LLC 600 SW 10TH ST, RENTON WA 98057 RECEIVED 12/13/2021 AMorganroth PLANNING DIVISION DocuSign Envelope ID: 3CB3A7A8-E3D0-4C56-A6E9-3567A8E14069 SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 2 of 12 4. Date checklist prepared: 5. Agency requesting checklist: 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. B. Environmental Elements [HELP] 1. Earth [help] a. General description of the site: (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other _____________ b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any agricultural land of long-term commercial significance and whether the proposal results in removing any of these soils. PER THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT, THE SITE IS COMPOSED OF A TOPSOIL LAYER, A FILL LAYER, AND A QUATERNARY ALLUVIUM LAYER THAT IS MEDIUM STIFF TO STIFF GRAY SILT WITH A TRACE OF SOME SAND. NCRS CLASSIFIES THIS AREAW AS URBAN LAND (Ur). 4% THE PROJECT LOCATION IS NORTH OF SW 10TH STREET BETWEEN THOMAS AVENUE AND LIND AVENUE.LOT 5 OF EARLINGTON INDUSTRIAL PARK NO. 1, ACCORDING TO PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 83 OF PLATS, PAGE 10, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. THIS PROJECT IS REDEVELOPMENT OF A LAYDOWN AREA BEHIND THE EXISTING BUILDING TO ACCOMMODATE ADDITIONAL PARKING. NO GOVERNMENTAL APPROVALS REQUIRED NO PENDING APPLICATIONS NO OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION BEING PROPOSED. NO BEGIN CONSTRUCTION IN MARCH 2022. CITY OF RENTON November 29, 2021 DocuSign Envelope ID: 3CB3A7A8-E3D0-4C56-A6E9-3567A8E14069 SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 3 of 12 d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. e. Describe the purpose, type, total area, and approximate quantities and total affected area of any filling, excavation, and grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: 2. Air [help] a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal during construction, operation, and maintenance when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: 3. Water [help] a. Surface Water: [help] 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. NO WATERS ONSITE OR IN THE VICINITY. NONE. NO IMPORTED OR EXPORTED FILL ANTICIPATED. NO. NO SURFACE WATER IS IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA. THE BLACK RIVER IS LOCATED 1,800 LINEAR FEET AWAY TO THE WEST. DUST CONTROL MAY INCLUDE WATERING AND COVERING OF STOCKPILE MOUNDS, IF NECESSARY. OTHER OFFSITE EMISSIONS MAY INCLUDE AN ASPHALT PLANT. HEAVY MACHINE USE INCLUDES: EXCAVATOR, GRADER, PAVERS, AND ROLLERS. TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES WILL INCLUDE DOWNSTREAM DEVICES SUCH AS SILT FENCING AND COMPOST SOCKS. A TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAP IS A POSSIBLE DESIGN SOLUTION TO PREVENT SEDIMENT FROM ENTERING THE STORM DRAIN SYSTEM. 87% OF THE SITE WILL BE IMPERVIOUS POST-CONSTRCUTION. EROSION IS EXPECTED TO CONTAINED WITHIN THE EXCAVATED TRENCH OR PIT. THIS IS A FLAT SITE AND IT IS EXPECTED THAT NO IMPOT OF EXPORT OF SOIL WILLBE REQUIRED. THE PROPOSED GRADING WILL INCLUDE UNDULATING PEAKS AND SAGS IN THE PARKING LOT. NO EVIDENCE OF UNSTABLE SOILS ON SITE. DocuSign Envelope ID: 3CB3A7A8-E3D0-4C56-A6E9-3567A8E14069 SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 4 of 12 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. b. Ground Water: [help] 1) Will groundwater be withdrawn from a well for drinking water or other purposes? If so, give a general description of the well, proposed uses and approximate quantities withdrawn from the well. Will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals. . . ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. c. Water runoff (including stormwater): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. 3) Does the proposal alter or otherwise affect drainage patterns in the vicinity of the site? If so, describe. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water, and drainage pattern impacts, if any: 4. Plants [help] a. Check the types of vegetation found on the site: A DETENTION VAULT WILL DETAIN FLOWS AND RELEASE FLOWS BELOW THOSE FLOWS UNDER PRECONDITIONS. NO CHANGE IN EXISTING DRAINAGE PATTERNS ARE PROPOSED. NO WASTE MATERIAL DISCHARGES ARE ANTICIPATED.ADDITIONALLY, THE SUBSURFACE SOILS PROHIBIT SURFACE INFILTRATION. THIS PROPOSAL PLANS TO DETAIN THE 2, 10, AND 100 YEAR PEAK RATES. THE 2-YEAR FLOWS WILL BE TREATED FOR QUALITY USING MODULAR WETLANDS. NO WASTE MATERIAL DISCHARGE IS ANTICIPATED. NO GROUNDWATER WITHDRAW IS ANTICIPATED. THE PROPOSAL DOES NOT DISCHARGE WASTE MATERIALS INTO THE SURFACE WATERS. THE PROPOSAL IS NOT WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN. DocuSign Envelope ID: 3CB3A7A8-E3D0-4C56-A6E9-3567A8E14069 SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 5 of 12 ____deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other ____evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other ____shrubs ____grass ____pasture ____crop or grain ____ Orchards, vineyards or other permanent crops. ____ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other ____water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other ____other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? c. List threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: e. List all noxious weeds and invasive species known to be on or near the site. 5. Animals [help] a. List any birds and other animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site. Examples include: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other ________ b. List any threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: e. List any invasive animal species known to be on or near the site. There are no known existing noxious weeds or invasive species on site. Proposed landscaping consists of the use of regionally-adapted trees, shrubs, and groundcover, with a mix of evergreen and deciduous species. 3” depth hardwood shredded mulch shall be applied to all tree and shrub planting areas. NO INVASIVE ANIMALS WERE OBSERVED ONSITE. NO PRESERVATION MEASURES ARE BEING PROPOSED. NO KNOWN MIGRATION ROUTE WAS OBSERVED ON SITE. NO KNOWN ENDANGERED SPECIES ARE PRESENT AT OR NEAR THE SITE. NO MAMMALS, BIRDS, OR REPTILES WERE OBSERVED DURING OUR SITE WALK. NO KNOWN ENDANGERED SPECIES ARE PRESENT AT OR NEAR THE SITE. REMOVAL OF PERIMETER GROUND COVER, SHRUBS, AND GRASSES ARE ANTICIPATED. DocuSign Envelope ID: 3CB3A7A8-E3D0-4C56-A6E9-3567A8E14069 SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 6 of 12 6. Energy and Natural Resources [help] a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: 7. Environmental Health [help] a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. 1) Describe any known or possible contamination at the site from present or past uses. 2) Describe existing hazardous chemicals/conditions that might affect project development and design. This includes underground hazardous liquid and gas transmission pipelines located within the project area and in the vicinity. 3) Describe any toxic or hazardous chemicals that might be stored, used, or produced during the project's development or construction, or at any time during the operating life of the project. 4) Describe special emergency services that might be required. 5) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indi- cate what hours noise would come from the site. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: WORKING WITHIN DESIGNATED WORK HOURS IS BEST PRACTICES TO MITIGATE NOISE EFFECTS. HEAVY EQUIPMENT OPERATION NOISE IS EXPECTED AND WILL BE BETWEEN THE HOURS OF 7:30 AM TO 7:30 PM. HEAVY EQUIPMENT OPERATION MAY BE HEARD. THE CURRENT USE ON SITE IS INDUTRIAL SO NO CHANGES TO THE AMBIENT NOISE ARE EXPECTED. GENERAL SITE SAFETY AND BEST PRACTICES SHOULD BE CONSIDERED THE BEST MEASURE TO REDUCE AND CONTROL ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS. CONSTRUCTION RELATED INJURY IS A POSSIBILITY DURING CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT. NO KNOWN TOXIC OR HAZARDOUS CHEMICALS WILL USED, STORED, OR PRODUCED DURING DEVELOPMENT AND CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT. NO KNOWN HAZARDOUS CHEMICAL WILL AFFECT THIS PROJECT. THERE IS AN ABOVE-GROUND FUEL TANK THAT MAY BE REMOVED. SPECIAL CAUTION SHOULD BE CONSIDERED DURING THIS REMOVAL. NO KNOWN ENVIRONMETAL HAZARDS ARE TO BE EXPOSED FROM THIS PROJECT. THE LACK OF IMPORT AND EXPORT OF FILL REDUCES TRUCKING RESOURCES. NO POSITIVE OR ADVERSE IMPACTS WOULD AFFECT ADJACENT PROPERTIES SOLAR USE. THERE IS A POTENTIAL FOR LOW VOLTAGE POWER SOURCE TO CONTROL A STORMWATER PUMP MAY BE REQUIRED. FINAL HYDRAULIC STUDY IS WARRANTED. DocuSign Envelope ID: 3CB3A7A8-E3D0-4C56-A6E9-3567A8E14069 SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 7 of 12 8. Land and Shoreline Use [help] a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Will the proposal affect current land uses on nearby or adjacent properties? If so, describe. b. Has the project site been used as working farmlands or working forest lands? If so, describe. How much agricultural or forest land of long-term commercial significance will be converted to other uses as a result of the proposal, if any? If resource lands have not been designated, how many acres in farmland or forest land tax status will be converted to nonfarm or nonforest use? 1) Will the proposal affect or be affected by surrounding working farm or forest land normal business operations, such as oversize equipment access, the application of pesticides, tilling, and harvesting? If so, how: c. Describe any structures on the site. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? h. Has any part of the site been classified as a critical area by the city or county? If so, specify. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: NO DISPLACEMENT OF PEOPLE IS EXPECTED. NO DISPLACEMENT OF PEOPLE IS EXPECTED. THE EXISTING USE WOULD NOT CHANGE AFTER COMPLETION OF PROJECT. CURRENTLY THERE ARE 35-40 EMPLOYEES THAT WORK THERE THROUGHOUT THE WEEK. NO ONE RESIDES THERE. THE SITE IS NOT CLASSIFIED AS CRITICAL AREA. THIS SITE IS NOT WITHIN THE SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM. THE SITE CURRENTLY HAS A COMPREHENSIVE LAND DESIGNATION AS EMPLOYTMENT AREA (EA). THE CURRENT ZONING IS MEDIUM INDUSTRIAL. NO STRUCTURES WILL BE DEMOLISHED BY THIS PROPOSAL. THERE IS ONE EXISTING WAREHOUSE AND ONE TELECOMMUNICATION ANTENNAE ON SITE. NO SURROUNDING FARMS OR FORESTS ARE ADJACENT TO THE SITE. THE SITE IS NOT A WORKING FARM OR FOREST. THE CURRENT USE IS TRUCK DELIVERY AND DISTRIBUTION. NO CHANGE IN USE IS PROPOSED. DocuSign Envelope ID: 3CB3A7A8-E3D0-4C56-A6E9-3567A8E14069 SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 8 of 12 L. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: m. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts to agricultural and forest lands of long -term commercial significance, if any: 9. Housing [help] a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, mid- dle, or low-income housing. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: 10. Aesthetics [help] a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? b. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: 11. Light and Glare [help] a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: NO PARKING LOT LIGHTING IS BEING PROPOSED BY THIS PROJECT. EXISTING STREET LIGHTING FROM SENECA AVENUE MAY REFLECT ONTO THE PROPOSED PARKING LOT. NO PARKING LOT LIGHTING IS BEING PROPOSED BY THIS PROJECT. NO PARKING LOT LIGHTING IS BEING PROPOSED BY THIS PROJECT. NO MEASURES ARE BEING PROPOSED TO REDUCE OR CONTROL AESTHETICS OF THE PARKING LOT. NO VIEWS WILL BE OBSTRUCTED BY THIS PROJECT SINCE IT IS A SURFACE PARKING LOT. NO ABOVE-GROUND STRUCTURES ARE BEING PROPOSED BY THIS PROJECT. NO RESIDENTIAL UNITS ARE BEING PROPOSED. NO RESIDENTIAL UNITS ARE BEING PROPOSED. NO RESIDENTIAL UNITS ARE BEING PROPOSED. NO FORESTED LANDS OR ARGICULTURAL IMPACTS ARE EXPECTED. THE PROPOSED PROJECT IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE EXISTING ZONING. DocuSign Envelope ID: 3CB3A7A8-E3D0-4C56-A6E9-3567A8E14069 SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 9 of 12 12. Recreation [help] a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: 13. Historic and cultural preservation [help] a. Are there any buildings, structures, or sites, located on or near the site that are over 45 years old listed in or eligible for listing in national, state, or local preservation registers ? If so, specifically describe. b. Are there any landmarks, features, or other evidence of Indian or historic use or occupation? This may include human burials or old cemeteries. Are there any material evidence, artifacts, or areas of cultural importance on or near the site? Please list any professional studies conducted at the site to identify such resources. c. Describe the methods used to assess the potential impacts to cultural and historic resources on or near the project site. Examples include consultation with tribes and the department of archeology and historic preservation, archaeological surveys, historic maps, GIS data, etc. d. Proposed measures to avoid, minimize, or compensate for loss, changes to, and disturbance to resources. Please include plans for the above and any permits that may be required. 14. Transportation [help] a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site or affected geographic area and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. b. Is the site or affected geographic area currently served by public transit? If so, generally describe. If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? c. How many additional parking spaces would the completed project or non-project proposal have? How many would the project or proposal eliminate? THE PROJECT PROPOSES A TOTAL OF 196 STALLS.THERE ARE 59 EXISTING STANDARD STALLS. THIS PROJECT PROPOSES AN ADDITIONAL 137 TRUCK STALLS. 6 EXISTING STALLS ARE BEING CONVERTED TO ADA STALLS. THE NEAREST PUBLIC TRANSIT CENTER IS LIND WAY AND SW GRADY AVE BUS STOP APPROXIMATELY 400 FEET TO THE EAST. THE SITE WILL BE ACCESSED FROM SW 1OTH STREET AND SENECA AVENUE. THERE ARE NO HISTORICAL FEATURES OBSERVED ON SITE. THERE ARE NO HISTORICAL FEATURES OBSERVED ON SITE OR LISTED ON THE CITY OF RENTON'S GIS DATA SITE. THERE ARE NO HISTORICAL FEATURES OBSERVED ON SITE.NO OTHER STUDY IS AVAILABLE. THERE ARE NO BUILDINGS OR STRUCTURES ON SITE THAT ARE OVER 45 YEARS OLD. NO EXISTING OR PROPOSED RECREATION USES OPPORTUNITIES WLL BE IMPACTED BY THIS PARKING LOT. NO EXISTING OR PROPOSED RECREATION USES WILL BE DISPLACED BY THIS PARKING LOT. THE NEAREST CITY PARK IS EARLINGTON PARK AND IT IS OVER 1 MILE AWAY. DocuSign Envelope ID: 3CB3A7A8-E3D0-4C56-A6E9-3567A8E14069 SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 10 of 12 d. Will the proposal require any new or improvements to existing roads, streets, pedestrian, bicycle or state transportation facilities, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). e. Will the project or proposal use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project or proposal? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur and what percentage of the volume would be trucks (such as commercial and nonpassenger vehicles). What data or transportation models were used to make these estimates? g. Will the proposal interfere with, affect or be affected by the movement of agricultural and forest products on roads or streets in the area? If so, generally describe. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: 15. Public Services [help] a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, public transit, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. 16. Utilities [help] a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other ___________ b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. The site is currently used for manufacturing and the current operations generate up to 450 daily trips based on data published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE)and up to 85 PM peak-hour trips (one hour between 4:00 PM and 6:00 PM) based on the current operations. This trip generation is detailed in the Traffic analysis completed by Gibson Traffic Consultants, Inc. (November 19, 2021). The proposed parking lot changes are not anticipated to change the current trip generation. Additionally, the proposed parking lot changes are not anticipated to change the percentage of trucks using the site. There are rail lines along the east side of the site and Renton Municipal Airport is approximately 1.5 miles northeast of the site. The proposed parking lot improvements are not anticipated to impact how either of these facilities are currently used. STORMWATER CONVEYANCE UTILITIES ARE PROPOSED FOR THIS PROJECT. NO OTHER UTILITY REQUIREMENT IS EXPECTED. NO ADDITIONAL MEASURES ARE PROPOSED. NO ADDITIONAL NEED FOR PUBLIC SERVICES ARE EXPECTED BEYOND WHAT IS CURRENTLY PRESENT. NO CHANGES TO CURRENT USE OR OTHER TRANSPORATION IMPACTS ARE EXPECTED. NO IMPACTS TO AGRICULTURAL OR FOREST PRODUCTS ARE EXPECTED. THIS PROJECT WILL PROVIDE 8 NEW BIKE SPACES AND ADD 6 ADA STALLS. ALL STALLS ARE CONSIDERED PRIVATE. DocuSign Envelope ID: 3CB3A7A8-E3D0-4C56-A6E9-3567A8E14069 SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 11 of 12 C. Signature [HELP] The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: ___________________________________________________ Name of signee __________________________________________________ Position and Agency/Organization ____________________________________ Date Submitted: _____________ D. Supplemental sheet for nonproject actions [HELP] (IT IS NOT NECESSARY to use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; pro- duction, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, NOVEMBER 29, 2021 CIVIL ENGINEER SKY MCCLAVE DocuSign Envelope ID: 3CB3A7A8-E3D0-4C56-A6E9-3567A8E14069 SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 12 of 12 wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. DocuSign Envelope ID: 3CB3A7A8-E3D0-4C56-A6E9-3567A8E14069